HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984 03 21 Staff Report Planning Dept.
e
VP;k performance product. a.sses JOB TASKS: Support of C~ss1on and Boards,
CITY CODES: Land Development. Zoning: ..
Val ter Thomas Elwell. CITY PLANNER. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA.
STAFF REPORT. PLANNING DEPT. ~ ORDER/DATE: 84,3,15,1
Development/Unit: REGENCY SEVILLE
Applicant/Age,nt: ETTO CORP./CONKLIN, PORTER & HOLMES
Review/Action Requested: CITY COMMISSION REVIEW/APPROVAL
FINAL ENGINEERING
Report Text. Page 1, RESULTS OF STAFF REVIEW MEETING
Assessment/
Validation
To: CITY MANAGER/Rozansky, and all parties who may become identified relevan
to .the above identified request for review/action,
Re: STAFF REVIEW-for action toward approval of the above identified develop-
ment.
~
26M~ g,f
From: CITY PLANNER/Elwell (s ign/ date) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
AT ITS MEETING, THURSDAY, 9 A..~., 22 MAR..84 , CITY HALL,
ATTENDED AS FOLLOWS:
1. APPLICANT/AGENT BILL HOLMES, JACKIE SMALLEY-PRESENT
..................................................................... 1.
e
,AND ;
2. CITY MANAGER/ABSENT
..................................................................... 2.
,AND;
3. BUILDING OFFICIAL/SMITH-PRESENT
..................................................................... 3.
,AND;
4. ENGR./PUBLIC WORKS DIR./HASSLER-PRESENT
. . . . . . . . . " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 4.
,AND;
5. FIRE CHIEF/HOLZMAN-PRESENT
..................................................................... 5.
,AND;
6. PLANNER/ELWELL-PRESENT
..................................................................... 6.
,AND;
7. POLICE CHIEF /GOVORUHK-PRESENT
.............................. ........... ..... ............ ........... 7.
,AND;
8. RECORDING SECRETARY/NOT AVAILABLE, NOTES BY ELWELL
..................................................................... 8.
,AND;
9. OTHER (SPECIFY);KATHLEEN DEGRENIA, HIGHLANDS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION-
paESEij''t . ." . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . .. . .. .... 9..
,AND FURTHER;
e
e
e
, STAFF REPORT, PLANNING DEPT. WORK ORDER/DATE: 84,3,15,1 / 21 MAR.84
~Deve1opment/Unit: REGENCY SEVILLE
~'App1icant/Agent: ETTO CORP./CONKLIN, PORTER & HOLMES
Review/Action Requested: CITY CO}~1ISSION REVIEW/APPROVAL
FINAL ENGINEERING
Report Text, Page 2, RESULTS OF STAFF REVIEW MEETING
Assessment/
Validation
PURSUANT TO THE APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE CITY CODE - THE CITY STAFF
FOUND THE FOLLOWING:
1. THE PLANS FOR THE DEVELOP~ENT (IDENTIFIED) ARE APPROVABLE
SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS TO BE MET:
A. SPECIFIED BY CITY MGR. -ABSENT
.............................................................. A.
,AND;
B. SPECIFIED BY BUILDING OFFICIAL -NO MEMO
.............................................................. B.
,AND;
C. SPECIFIED BY ENGR./PUBLIC WORKS DIR.- NO MEMO
........ ~..................................................... c.
,AND;
D. SPECIFIED BY FIRE CHIEF -MEMO ATTACHED
.............................................................. D.
e
,AND;
E. SPECIFIED BY PLANNER -SUBMITTED HEREWITH
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. E.
,AND;
F. SPECIFIED BY POLICE CHIEF -NO MEMO
.............................................................. F.
,AND;
G. CONDITIONS BY THE BD. ARISING FROM DISCUSSION (RECORDED) AMONG
THE PARTIES PRESENT, AND SPECIFIED HEREIN AND AS FOLLOWS:
(I). THE APPLICANT SHALL REVISE THE PLAN (PARKING SPACE
DETAIL, ATTACHED) TO PROVIDE SIX (6) FT. WIDE SIDE-
WALKS WHERE THEY MUST SERVE TO PROVIDE TWO (2) FT.
OVERHANG AREA FOR 200 SQ.FT. PARKING SPACES, AND
WHERE FOUR (4) FT. OF USABLE SIDEWALK IS REQUIRED WHEN
PARKING SPACES MAY BE OCCUPIED, OR ALTERNATIVELY;
THE APPLICANT SHALL SECURE BD. OF ADJUSTMENT APPROVAL
FOR 180 SQ. FT. PARKING SPACES IN CONJUNCTION WITH FOUR
(4) FT. WIDE SIDm~ALKS.
(2). THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE 3~ FT. WIDE COLLECTOR
SIDEWALK AT BLDG. 15, AND;
e
(3). THE POSTMASTER t1UST CONCUR (FAVORABLE REVIEW AND RE-
SPONSE IN WRITING TO THE CITY PLANNER) WITH THE
APPLICANT'S STREET NAME/ADDRESSING PLAN (DIRECTORY!
CENTRAL DELIVERY SCHEME TO BE SUBMITTED BY APPLICANT),
...
e
e
STAFF REPORT, PLANNING DEPT. WORK ORDER/DATE: 84,3,15,1 21 MAR. 84
e
Development/Unit: REGENCY SEVILLE
}App1icant/Agent: ETTO CORP./CONKLIN, PORTER & HOLMES
Review/Action Requested: CITY COMMISSION REVIEW/APPROVAL
FINAL ENGINEERING
Report Text, Page 3, RESULTS OF STAFF REVIEW MEETING
Assessment/
Validation
(4) THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE SIDEWALKS DESIGNED AND
CONSTRUCTED TO CITY SPECIFICATIONS WITHIN THE WEST
RIGHT OF WAY OF THE COLLECTOR STREET (SHEOAH BLVD.),
AND;
(5) THE APPLICANT MUST COMPLY WITH THE CITY FIRE CHIEF'S
MEMO DATED 22 MAR. 84 (REFER: ITEM 6. CONDITIONS/
EXCEPTIONS), AND;
(6) THE APPLICANT MUST SUBMIT FOR REVIEW/ APPROVAL BY THE
CITY ENGR. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS
FOR THE PRIVATE ACCESS DRIVE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY
(PROPOSED BY THE APPLICANT AS A CONDITION OF THEIR
TRANSACTION WITH THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER),
e
WTE/mn
Attachments: Attached
e
cc: Applicant/Agent,
City Commission,
All Departments,
File (identified)