HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982 02 17 Planning and Zoning Board Regular Minutes
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
FEBRUARY 17, 1982
Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Board was called to order by Chairman George
Kaplan at 7:30 p.m. The pledge of allegiance to the flag was led by Leanne Grove.
Roll Call:
George Kaplan, present
Cindy Kaehler, present
Leanne Grove, present
City Officials:
Joel Weiss, present
Bill Daucher, present
Jacqueline Koch, City Planner
Jack Cooper, City Engineer
Motion was made by Daucher to approve the minutes of January 20, 1982. Seconded by
Grove. Vote: All aye. Motion carried.
REQUEST OF SID VIHLEN, JR. TO ANNEX LOTS 52, 53, 54 AND 55, ENTZMINGER FARMS ADDITION
NO.2 - 22.6 ACRES NORTH OF PEARL ROAD BETWEEN HAYES AND SHORE ROADS - CURRENTLY
ZONED AGRICULTURAL, WITH REZONING TO RESIDENTIAL PENDING COUNTY ACTION.
The City Planner pointed out the property and stated the property extends from Hayes
Road on the west to Shore Road on the east. The nearest road on the south is Pearl
Road. Ms. Koch stated it is approximately 500 X 2,000 feet wide. She stated the
request is to annex into the City and under State Law the current county zoning which
is A-l would have to be matched in the City by the nearest category we have which
would be R-U. This would be our agricultural/residential zone such as Dunmar. Ms.
Koch stated this is a large one-acre minimum lot size category that can be used for
residential or agricultural purposes. She stated the applicant has pending a request
to rezone the property with Seminole County to a land use which he contends is con-
sistent with the adjacent zoning of the R-IA. This zoning has not been decided by
Seminole County therefore we are looking at it to be annexed as R-U until the county
makes a decision. If the county makes no decision on rezoning and leaves it A-l
agricultural it will have to remain that way for two years under State Law. It would
have to stay R-U for two years before the City could rezone it.
Mr. Sid Vihlen, Crane's Roost Office Park, 317 Whooping Loop, Altamonte Springs, was
present and stated after speaking with the county officials as well as the City
staff they agreed it was agreed that this property should be a part of the City of
Winter Springs in relation to Fire, Police and utilities. Mr. Vihlen stated they
are now in the planning stages with regard to the eventual use of the property.
The applicant stated he did want to meet with the surrounding homeowners and try to
come up with a compatible plan to protect the neighborhood and to preserve the natural
setting as much as possible. Mr. Vihlen said their initial plan was to develop
R-IA type lots down the street which backs up against the residents on Pearl Rd. He
stated right up against what will become commercial property along 434 he had planned
to develop the same size lots you find on Pearl Rd. but put duplexes in.
Mr. Vihlen stated the county has granted him the opportunity to come right back
for the R-IA zoning as it is contiguous to the Pearl Rd. residential development and
that the county has not granted him the opportunity to come back immediately with
regard to the duplex area. Mr. Vihlen stated if they did not finish their zoning
and planning in the county in time for the final annexation hearing in Winter Springs,
he will request a delay at an appropriate point to intermesh both activities.
Mr. Daucher asked the City Planner if the property could be annexed into the City
before the final approved zoning of the county or if it is annexed into the City does
the City have anything to do regarding the zoning. Ms. Koch stated at the time the
annexation is voted on at the public hearing, which the City Commission will have to
have, the property would be zoned at whatever its current zoning would be comparable
in the City. If it were to remain A-I at the date of the final vote, it would come
into the City as R-U. The City would have no real influence with the county over
whether or not to grant the rezoning prior to that time. If it came into the City as
Planning and Zoning Board Me~cing
February 17, 1982
Page Two.
R-U it would have to remain R-U for a period of two years under State Law before the
City could take any action of its own to rezone the property without approval of the
prior jurisdiction. If Seminole County does not rezone it prior to annexation the
only other alternative would be to request they waive the two-year waiting period.
Daucher asked what the proposed density was. Mr. Vihlen stated the density that was
introduced to the county in his first zoning effort in R-IA, he was looking at virtually
the same density as that development on Pearl Rd., which runs about 4 units an acre.
l1r. Vihlen stated he thought the lots were planned to run a little larger than those
on Pearl Rd. In the duplex area, it was proposed to develop on the same size lots
as those single-family lots but a duplex would go on each lot. The proposal was for
8 units per acre. Mrs. Grove asked the applicant if he knew the status of Celery
Avenue. Mr. Vihlen stated in a joint effort between himself and the propertyowners
they are going to ask for the Celery Avenue issue to be cleaned up and they are going
to ask the county to vacate the right of way. Mr. Vihlen stated he did not see a
need for Celery and that he had met with the appropriate county staff and that they
did not see a need for Celery. Mr. Vihlen stated his lawyer is doing a title search
on it right now, and that he would have some answers in about two - three weeks.
Ms. Kaehler asked why the county turned down his request. Mr. Vihlen stated it was
his understanding that certain members of the county commission were oppossed to a
duplex development at that location and were in favor of the entire tract being R-IA.
Ms. Kaehler asked why they were against duplexes and if it had something to do with
the traffic input. Mr. Vihlen stated he was not at the hearing, but that he is having
a traffic engineering study done based on this development. He stated this study
should be completed within three weeks and that it was going to state that this
development concept as shown does not adversely affect the traffic. The Chairman
stated as he understood it, the county denied rezoning from agricultural to single-
family and duplexes due to the high density of the duplex section located south of
434 and this intersection with S.R. 419. Mrs. Marsha Bracht, President of Sugartree
Station Homeowners' Assn. was present and stated the Association incorporates Alton
Road and Pearl Road. Mrs. Bracht stated they are oppossed to the duplexes. She
mentioned the drainage problems experienced by the homeowners on Pearl and Alton Roads.
Mr. Ed Evanhardt, 627 Pearl Rd. spoke on the traffic. The Chairman stated it was
his understanding that the applicant had been granted half of his request (to build
the single-family homes) but not the duplexes. The homeowners present at the county
Planning and Zoning Meeting stated Mr. Vihlen's associate stated if he could not
be granted the request as a whole that it be turned down. It was their understanding
that the request had been turned down as a whole. Mrs. Dianne Brown, 604 Pearl Rd.
stated her objection to the duplexes. Mrs. Sondra Ribakoff, Alton Rd., stated her
objection to the multi-family units. There was discussion as to the definition of
the word; "multi-dwelling." The Chairman stated the limits in this zoning are 35
feet (heighth). He stated this could encompass a 2-story garden apartment. The
City Planner stated it is her understanding that the county has denied any further
hearing on the northern section of the property at this time or anytime in the next
year. She stated they will entertain a rehearing on the southern half to R-IA
which is comparable to the homes on Pearl and Alton so if it is brought into the
City, it would be brought in as R-U - Rural Urban (farming, hog farm, one-acre farm
estate sites). We would be bringing in the southern half as R-IA. Ms. Koch stated
that is all the county will do for one year if it is not brought into the City.
If the City brings it in we would have to leave it as R-U for two years unless the
county at the end of the one-year period they have for limitation would grant the
waiver. The Planner stated whether it is annexed or not there will not be any
multi-family development in that area for at least one year. Mr. Vihlen stated
Planning and Zoning Board MecGing
February 17, 1982
Page Three.
under R-2 zoning which is a duplex sitting basically in the middle of the lot is the
single category he cannot take back for one year, however he can file for a multitude
of additional zoning categories to include high-style condominiums, PUD or other
similarities on the northern section. Ms. Koch stated the City only has one multi-
family zone which is R-3. Although the county didn't rezone it R-2, should they
rezone it to anyother county multi-family zone it would come into the City as R-3.
What applies is the City R-3 site development standards which allows 16 units per
acre, a maximum of 35 feet height. She stated there is no way beforehand you can
be convinced that the maximum will not be developed on that property. These are
topics to be covered in the preliminary plan.
Weiss moved to deny the request of Sid Vihlen, Jr. pending the action of the county.
Motion died due to lack of a second.
Daucher moved to grant Mr. Sid Vihlen's request to annex lots 52, 53, 54 and 55,
Entzminger Farms Addition No. 2 - 22.6 acres north of Pearl Road between Hayes and
Shore Roads - currently zoned agricultural into the City of Winter Springs. Seconded
by Kaehler. Vote: Daucher, aye; Weiss, no; Grove; aye; Kaehler, aye; Kaplan, no;
motion carried.
Meeting adjourned at 9:00 p.m.
Re~c~(j;~J<.
~an L. Braddock,
Recording Secretary.