HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976 03 26 Planning and Zoning Board Regular Minutes
Hinter Springs Planning &, Zoning B02.rd
Harch 26, 1976
Hon. Mayor & City Council
City of Winter Springs
Winter Sprines, FL 32707
Gentlemen:
RF: Requested change in Preliminary
Development Plan, Tuscawilla
POO
At a Public Hearing on Thursday, Narch 25, 1976, the Hinter Springf Planning &
Zoning Board unanimously approved the follo~nn8 motion:
-
"Nove that the P&Z Board recommend to the Hinter Springs City Council thC't the
requ~sted change in the Tuscav.Jilla PUD preliminary development pl,3n for an e.p-
proxlmately 52-acre parcel be approved, subject to the eventual submission of
a final development plan covering the subject parcel 1!'Jhich shall consist of
properly identified exhibits and supporting materials to include the following:
1. Identification of the present owners and developers of all land
included in the Final Development Plan.
2. Identification of all consultante involved in the preparation of the
Final Development Plan.
3. A location map indicating the relationship between the area proposed
for final development, the r@mainder of the area within the approved
Preliminary Development Plan and the surrounding area..
4. Boundary survey, legal description, and gross acreage of the area
submitted- for final approval.
5. A preliminary subdivision plan (preliminary plat), if the applicant
proposes to create 3 or more parcels..
6. A plot plan with scaled dimensions including but not limited to the
following:
a. The name, location, ROW width, and width of pavement of proposed
streets, easements, pedestrian ways, bicycle paths, and water courses.
b. The name, location, width, and design of ex~sting streets, including
abutting arterials within 200 ft. of the subject property.
c. The locations, dimensions, and uses of all buildings and structures,
including proposed property lines, utility plants and permanent signs.
d. Open and covered off-street pa~king areas, including landscaping
and external lighting systems. .
e. Distance of dwelling units from vehicular accessways and parking
areas.
f. Walls, fencing, or landscaping between private and common areas,
along streets and highways, drainage ways, railroads, and along the
periphery of the development.
g. Refuse storage areas and method of solid waste disposal.
h. Areas to be conveyed or dedicated and improved for roadways, parks,
playgrounds, school sites, utilities, and other similar public or semi-
public uses.
i. The number and type of permanent and transient dwelling units; the
floor area ratio of commercial and/or industrial uses; density by
number of dwelling units per gross residential acre; minimum floor areas
for each residential building type; minimum setbacks and building
separations; maximum lot coverage; minimum floor elevation; and height
of structures.
7. A general landscaping and tree planting plan indicating areas and
vegetation to be preserved and the proposed method of preservation, in
addition to proposed irrigation systems and landscaping materials.
8. Design elevations and/or renderings of all proposed buildings or
structures.
~
Nayor & City Council ... Page 2
March 26, 1976
9. Total acreage and types of open space and recreation.
10. Specific recreational facilities and improvements.
11. Preliminary engineering plans for roads, water, fire protection,
sanitary sewer, and storm water management systems including existing
ground surfaces and proposed elevations; typical cross-sections of
proposed grading, streets and sidewalks, canals and waterways; and pro-
posed types of pavement. Said plans must be approved by the City Engineer.
12. Covenants, conditions, restrictions, agreements, and grants which
govern the use,maintenance,and continued protection of buildings, structures~
landscaping, common open space, and recreational areas and facilities
within the development. Said documents shall indicate to the satisfaction
of the City Attorney an acceptable method of insuring that all obliga-
tions and improvements designated on the Final Development Plan can and
shall be completed. Bonds or an escrow account may be required in order
to satisfy this concern.
13. All exhibits must indicate the title, name, graphic scale, and
date of submittal and any subsequent revisions.
Further, that the \h1irl~8r Springs City Council take no action on the request un-
til the applicant has provided the City Clerk 1rJith the foll mving:
1. A completed application form.
2. An updated map of the entire Tuscalr.rilla
and an accurate legend.
3. A letter formally requesting
including the changes sought and a
concept of the subject parcel."
PUD, including maximum densities
the change in the preliminpry development plan,
general description of the proposed lcmd Uf'e
(end of motion)
Due to the length and complexity of this motion, permit me to explain briefly the
rationale of the P&Z Board in adopting it.
1. By adoption of the motion the P&Z Board expresses its approval in concept
of the requested change and of the proposed use of the 52-acre parcel... based
on the limited information the Board has been able to secure.
2. The first portion of the motion (numbered 1-13) attempts to insure that,
before any construction is authorized, sufficient data will be submitted by the
developer to enable the P&Z Board, the City Council, and interested citizens to
determine precisely what will be built on the subject parcel.
3. The second portion of the motion (numbered 1-3) addresses the P&Z Board's
concern of the fact that nothing has been submitted by the developer in writing
requesting a change in the preliminary development plan or indicating how the
parcel will be developed. The P&Z Board has asked the developer to submit the
material called for in #1, #2, and #3, but has received nothing. Rather than
continuing the Public Hearing until the material is submitted by the developer,
the P&Z Board has gone on record as favoring in concept the requested change ...
but it strongly urges the City Council not to approve the request until the re-
quested material has been submitted.
Mayor & City Council... Page 3
March 26, 1976
The Planning & Zoning Board does not wish to delay unduly the process of placing
the requested change before the City Council for action, but the Board feels it
must express its concern over the inadequacy of the existing PUD ordinance which
permits the approval of a change in the preliminary development plan without re-
quiring the applicant to submit a single document.
Adoption by the City Council of the proposed PUD ordinance already recommended by
the P&Z Board would, of course, eliminate this shortcoming.
Any member of the P&Z Board will be delighted to discuss this letter with you.
Sincerely,
5!~o((~
cc: City Clerk
Members, P&Z Board