HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999 09 13 Public Hearings Item C
II" I
r'l
I I
,
J' !
It
COMMISSION AGENDA
ITEM C
Consent
Informational
Public Hearing X
Regular
September 13. 1999
Meeting
MGRf-" DEP~
Authorizatio~
REQUEST: The Community Development Department - Planning Division request the City
Commission hold a public hearing for the first reading of Ordinance 739 to
adopt the Capital Improvements Program / Capital Outlays document.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this Board item is the consideration of a Capital Improvements
Program / Capital Outlays which serves as a planning tool to provide a
perspective of the City's capital needs. It is through a Capital Improvements /
Capital Outlays Program review process that long range plans for the orderly
maintenance and improvement of Winter Springs' physical assets can be
accomplished.
APPLICABLE LAW & PUBLIC POLICY:
The provisions of 163.3177(1)(b) Florida Statutes which states "The capital
improvements element shall be reviewed on an annual basis and modified as necessary
in accordance with 163.3187 or 163.3189, except that corrections, updates, and
modifications concerning costs, revenue sources, acceptance of facilities pursuant to
dedications which are consistent with the plan; or the date of construction of any
facility enumerated in the capital improvements element may be accomplished by
ordinance and shall not be deemed to be amendments to the local comprehensive plan.
All public facilities shall be consistent with the capital improvements element."
CDD/September 2, 199911 :37 PM
SEPTEMBER 13, 1999
PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM C
Page 2
The provisions of9J-5.016(5) Florida Administrative Code which states in part "In
addition to the general monitoring and evaluation requirements in this Chapter, this
element (capital improvements) shall be reviewed on an annual basis."
CONSIDERA TIONS:
.
The Capital Improvements Program is a plan adopted by the City Commission
outlining the annual operating and capital budget. There is no commitment to
expenditures or appropriations beyond the first year (Capital Budget), except
for those capital improvements programmed in the Capital Improvement
Element.
.
The various department heads have prepared their appropriate sections of the
Capital Improvements Program and reviewed them collectively and made
appropriate adjustments.
.
The Capital Improvements Program / Capital Outlays document was presented
to the Local Planning Agency for their review and recommendation on
September l' 1999. The LP A recommended approval to the City Commission.
FUNDING:
N/A
RECOMMENDATION:
The staff recommends that the City Commission approve the first reading of the Capital
Improvements Program / Capital Outlays document as presented.
IMPLEMENTA nON:
The City Commission would hold a public hearing for the second reading and adoption
of Ordinance 739 on September 27, 1999. The ordinance would take effect upon
adoption.
CDD/September 2,1999/1:37 PM
SEPTEMBER 13,1999
PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM C
Page 3
ATTACHMENT:
A. Ordinance 739
B. Capital Improvements Program / Capital Outlays document
COMMISSION ACTION:
CDD/September 2, 1999/1 :37 PM
ORDINANCE NO. 739
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER
SPRINGS, FLORIDA ADOPTING THE
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM I
CAPITAL OUTLAYS FOR FISCAL YEAR
1999/2000 IN ACCORDANCE WITH
163.3177(1)(B) FLORIDA STATUTES AND
9J-5.016(5) FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE
CODE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY;
CONFLICTS; AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, The City Commission desires to adopt a Capital
Improvements Program / Capital Outlays document in accordance with the
provisions of 163.3177(l)(b) Florida Statutes as part of its annual operating and
capital budget process.
WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency has reviewed the Capital
Improvements Program I Capital Outlays document and has recommended to the
City Commission adoption of same, in accordance with 163.3174 Florida
Statutes;
"
ATTEST:
ANDREA LORENZO-LUACES
INTERIM CITY CLERK, CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
FIRST READING
POSTED
SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING
-..
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
Ronald W. McLemore
City Manager
1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32708.2799
Telephone (407) 327-1800
September ,1, 1999
Chairman Stevens and Members of the Local Planning Agency:
.
The City Administration has developed a proposed Capital Improvements I Capital
Outlays Program for the five (5) year planning period Fiscal Year 99/2000 through
Fiscal Year 2003/2004, As City Manager, I am pleased to submit this Capital
Improvements I Capital Outlays Program document for Local Planning Agency review
and recommendation, This document has been prepared to provide both a perspective
of and a planning tool for the City's capital needs. Sufficient project detail is provided
to enable those who review it to make informed decisions about the programming of
projects over the planning period, It is through a Capital Improvements I Capital
Outlays Program review process that long range plans for the orderly maintenance and
improvement of Winter Springs' physical assets can be accomplished.
The Capital Improvements / Capital Outlays Program is ideally the embodiment of the
various policies set down by the City Commission with City Administration
involvement to achieve specific goals, objectives, and policies. Some of these goals,
objectives and policies are contained in the adopted Winter Springs Comprehensive
Plan, The City Administration has made a substantial effort to prepare this document
that is reflective of the needs of the citizens of Winter Springs,
Respectfully Submitted,
.
If ~ tJ.?#..?-t
Ronald W, McLemore
City Manager
.
.
.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
Purpose
Definition of Capital Improvements Program (CIP)
Process
Development of the Capital Improvement Program
Department Ranking of Proposed Capital Improvement
Relationship to the City's Comprehensive Plan
The City's Comprehensive Plan
ObjeCtive of the Capital Improvements Element
Priorities of C~pital Improvements
Annual Update of the Capital Improvements Element
Criteria for Evaluation of Capital Improvements
Relationship Between the Operating and Capital Budgets
Inventory of Existing Revenue Sources
Fiscal Policy Framework
Types of Changes
c.LE. Level of Service Standards
Capital Outlays
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
6
6
7
7
8
8
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
Transportation Impact Fee Fund
Transportation Improvement Fund
.
County Traffic Circulation Projects
CAPITAL OUTLAYS
Fire Department
Police Department
Parks and Recreation Department
Utilities/Public Works Department
Public Works General Fund
Stonnwater Utility
Potable Water
Sanitary Sewer
Reclaimed Water
Equipment
APPENDICES
. Appendix A - C.LE. Level of Service Standards
Appendix B - Inventory of Existing Revenue Sources
Appendix C - Population Projections
.
.
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM/CAPITAL OUTLAYS
1999/2000 UPDATE
INTRODUCTION:
Purpose
One of the responsibilities of local government is to provide, maintain, and improve a
community's infrastructure of buildings, roads, water and sewer lines, parks, etc, A
Capital Improvements Program should be an expression of sOWld financial management
and development practice, Local governments that wish to lure business investment in
their community recognize that a well planned infrastructure program is essential, The
Capital Improvements Program (CIP) selVes as the linkage between the City's
Comprehensive Plan, fiscal plan and development.
Definition of Capital Improvements Program (C,I.P,)
In its essentials, the Capital Improvements Program is a multi-year prioritized schedule
of improvements that lists each capital improvement by year it is purchased or
commenced, the amoWlt to be spent per year and the method of financing such
improvement. Chapter 163 Florida Statutes and 9J-5 Florida Administrative Code
require a 5- Year Schedule of Capital Improvements, The first year of the 5- Year
Schedule is the Capital Budget and the following four years becoming the actual Capital
Improvement Program,
The Capital Improvement Program is a plan adopted by the City Commission with the
adoption of the annual operating and capital budget, without a commitment to
expenditures or appropriations beyond the first year, except for those capital
improvements programmed in the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) , Projects
programmed in the 5- Year Capital Improvement Element (CIE) have a commitment for
fimding for the five year period through the adopted Comprehensive Plan, The CIE is a
five year program that is updated annually through the Capital Improvements Program
Process and can be amended twice a year through the Comprehensive Plan amendment
process.
It should be noted that a Capital Improvements Program is not a fixed document but a
flexible, evolutionary document that should be updated each year to show the changing
. priorities, opportwrities, costs, or different financing approaches.
1
.
.
.
Process
Development of the Capital Improvement Program
1, Project Request Forms are prepared by various departments of the City,
These forms require a project description, justification, cost estimates,
impact on the City's operating budget, implementation schedule, and
project location,
2, The Project Request Forms are reviewed by the Planning Department
(Community Development Division) [as required by Objective C, Policy 3
of the Capital Improvements Element], the Finance Department, and then
the City Manager,
3, The Local Planning Agency (LP A) reviews the City Manager's
recommended Capital Improvements Program in terms of the community's
needs and financing, and then makes recommendation to the City
Commission.
4,
The LP A recommendation and the City Manager's recommendation are
considered by the City Commission in developing the annual operating
budget (effective the first day of October each year i,e, beginning of 'the
Fiscal Year "FY"),
Department Ranking of Proposed Capital Improvement
Each Project Request Form has a department priority recommendation,
The priority ranking indicates the department's importance of the project
to the departments functional program, The priority designations are as
follows:
1, Critical Deficiency - required to eliminate proven or obvious
dangers to public or employee health or safety,
2, Existing Deficiency - needed to raise a service or facility to an
adopted Level of Service,
3,
Repair/replacement - maintains adopted Level of Service Standard
in developed areas and gives comparable service standards in
developing areas,
2
..
.
.
4.
Future need/planned expansion - enables the City to provide seIVice
required for scheduled development.
Relationship to the City's Comprehensive Plan
Under Florida's growth management legislation, the Capital Improvements Program is
one of the essential elements of the comprehensive plan. The Local Government
Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act passed by the
Legislature in 1985 (163.3161 Florida Statutes) mandated local governments prepare a
financially feasible Capital Improvements Element as part of their comprehensive plan.
Local governments must:
.
Develop a financially feasible plan;
Determine the capital improvements needed to attain and maintain adopted
Levels Of SeIVice (LOS);
Develop a monitoring system to ensure that programmed capital
improvements are ~ctua1ly completed, and adopted levels of seIVice are
maintained;
Revise Land Development Regulations to include the concurrency
prOVISIon,
.
.
.
The Capital Improvements Element differs from the Capital Improvements Program in
that certain capital improvements are stated as required at the time of the adoption of the
Comprehensive Plan to meet the indicated Levels of SeIVice in the respective Elements,
The Capital Improvements Program is a rolling 5- Year Schedule of Improvements that
state additional improvements needed to maintain the LOS indicated in the Capital
Improvements Element or improvements that are above and beyond those required to
maintain the LOS, Hence, the Capital Improvements Program includes the Capital
Improvements Element and all other capital projects to be funded by the City and is the
linkage between capital expenditures and policy,
The City'$ Comprehensive Plan
The City of Winter Springs adopted Comprehensive Plan is comprised of eight (8)
Elements as specified in Chapter 163 Florida Statutes and in Rule 9J-5 Florida
Administrative Code, Effective planning and growth management includes the adequate
provision of services and infrastructure and is required by the State to be addressed in
certain Elements of a Comprehensive Plan, For the City of Winter Springs, these are:
3
.
.
.
Traffic Circulation
Recreation and Open Space
Solid Waste
Water
Sewer
Storm water (drainage)
Another Element, the Capital Improvements Element [C.lE,], consolidates the Level of
Service Standards (page 73 of VoL 2 of 2 of the Comprehensive Plan) indicated for each
of the above areas and policies that ensures effective implementation {See Appendix AL
Objective of the Capital Improvements Element
Throughout the planning period, the C,lE, shall be used as a basis for development of a
fiscally sound Capital Improvements Program to ensure that construction of capital
facilities is adequate to accommodate desired future growth, Allocation of future growth
shall be determined through coordination of fiscal and land use decisions, within the
Schedule of Capital Improvements,
The C.lE, promotes this assurance through the adoption of a financially feasible 5- Year
Schedule of Capital hnprovements for each type of facility, and measuring whether those
improvements are adequate to meet current and projected demands for the five (5) years
fOlWard, Objective A, Policy 3 in the C,lE, requires the City to annually update the
5- Year Schedule of Capital Improvements,
Priorities of Capital Improvements
The City's Comprehensive Plan indicates in Objective A, Policy 1 of the Capital
hnprovements Element that Projects selected year by year for funding shall be those
from which the greatest public benefit will be derived from the funds available, To this
end:
· Transportation
Improvements shall be prioritized according to a hierarchy of funding
municipal collector roads needed to enhance delivery of emergency
services, to facilitate access to schools and recreational facilities, to
provide alternative routes to use on congested arterials, to create
convenient access to goods and services,
4
.
.
.
.
Potable Water and Sanitary Sewer
Improvements shall be ranked to ensure the continued provision of safe and
sufficient service to existing residences and businesses, to implement
projects designed to protect water quality and conselVe water supplies, to
install equipment that will economize operations and reduce the
conswners' costs, to expand the capacity of the utilities to selVe new
development and thereby generate reselVation and connection fees to be
reinvested in the utility operations.
· Stormwater
Improvement priorities shall be those detennined by the City-wide drainage
study to be conducted through the proposed storm water utility,
· Recreation and Open Space
Capital projects funded in the future beyond those already allocated shall
be selected to fulfill neighborhoods needs for additional land and
installation of active recreational facilities within safe walking distance of
residential areas, to expand the variety of activities offered at the City's
community park, to address r~creation for special interests of citizens,
Annual Update of the Capital Improvements Element
The pwposes for the annual review and update of the C,I.E, are:
· Adjust the 5- Year Schedule of Capital Improvements fOlWard one year into
the future, so that there is always an improvements program that covers a
future 5-year time period,
· Maintain continued consistency of the first year of each 5-year period with
annual budgets as they are adopted,
· assure continued financial feasibility and provision of adequate services
and facilities,
Criteria for Evaluation of Capital Improvements
The city in the annual update of the 5- Year Schedule of capital improvements shall use
the following criteria to evaluate capital improvements projects:
5
.
.
.
· Consistency with the Elements of the Comprehensive Plan;
.
Elimination of existing deficiencies;
· Impact on the annual operating and capital budgets;
· The location in relation to the Future Land Use Map;
· Accommodation of demands from redevelopment and new development;
· Consistency with plans of state agencies and the St. Johns River Water
Management District;
· Additional identified revenue sources to complete the improvement;
· Financial feasibility,
Relationship Between the Operating and Capital Budgets
The operating and capital budgets are closely linked, The operating budget must cover
the cost of financing, maintaining and operating new facilities that are built under the
capital budget. The operating budget, through the debt service fund, must pay interest
expense and principal payments on all bonded debt.
Inventory of Existing Revenue Sources
To implement a Capital Improvements Program, there must be identified adequate
available funds for financing the capital improvements listed in the 5- Year Schedule of
Capital Improvements, The effectiveness of the C,I.P, is dependent on the financial
resources behind it. Chapter 163 F,S, and 9J-5 F.A,C, require a Capital Improvements
Program to be financially feasible, Some of these fund sources present some difficulty in
their prediction such as federal and state funding due to the significant variation from
year to year, Special assessments present similar difficulty,
Winter Spring's major fund categories and their use as funding mechanisms for both the
operating and capital improvements budget are described in Appendix B,
6
.
.
.
Fiscal Policy Framework
The following fiscal policy framework shall be used to formulate the Capital
Improvements Program each year, as indicated in Objective A, Policy 2 of the Capital
Improvements Element:
· The City shall continue the conservative fiscal policies evident in the initial
Capital Improvements Program.
a. Debt shall be limited to bondable revenue, as was the case to fund
scheduled utility and recreation construction.
b. Responsible debt ratios shall be maintained, comparable to those
reflected in the current status:
1. Maximum ratio of total debt service to total revenue:
City coverage
Water & Sewer
2.31
1.73
ll.
Maximmn ratio of. outstanding capital indebtedness to
property tax base:
City Coverage
27.17
Types of Changes
The types of changes made to the 5- Year Schedules of Capital Improvements in each
update are summarized below:
· The 5-year time period is adjusted from FY 98/99 through 2002/2003 to
FY 99/2000 through 2003/2004. New projects incorporated based upon
the extension to FY 2003/20034 will be consistent with the relative
priorities for capital improvements established in the Comprehensive Plan
in each facility Element and in Objective A, Policy 1 of the Capital
Improvements Element.
7
.
.
.
.
The schedules or funding sources of some projects are adjusted to reflect
management and funding strategies developed in conjunction with the
FY 99/2000 adopted budget.
· Project costs are updated as appropriate based upon recent actual costs or
updated background studies. Currently available revenue sources will
fund the proposed improvements, thus maintaining the financial feasibility
established in the 1992 Comprehensive Plan.
, Additionally, summary sheets accompany each improvements schedule and are updated
as follows:
· To reflect the adjusted schedules of improvements discussed above.
· To evaluate capacity needs for 1999 and 2004, based upon socio-economic
estimates and projections for those years which have been updated based
upon the following:
a. Preliminary population estimate by the Bureau of Economic and
Business Research at the University of Florida.
b.
Building Permits issued by the Building Department of the City.
c. The Comprehensive Plan Figure LU-F9 "Estimated and Projected
Population (1970 through 2010) [Appendix C]
The population projection of the City of Winter Springs for July 1, 1999 is:
29,265
C.I.E. Level of Service Standards
The principal criterion for capital improvements will be level of service (LOS) standards,
quantitative indicators of the amount of service provided by a facility or type of facility.
The City's need for capital improvements is largely determined by the LOS standards
adopted in its Comprehensive Plan.
8
.
.
.
In accordance with Objective C, Policy 1 of the Capital Improvements Element,
Development approvals shall not degrade the Level of Service Standard adopted by the
City of Winter Springs. [See Appendix A]
Capital Outlays
Only items that meet the definition of a capital outlay will be included in the Capital
Outlay Program. The definition of a capital outlay is:
A physical asset, constructed or purchased, and having a useful life of three (3)
years and a minimum cost of $ 10,000.
Capital outlays may include:
· new and expanded facilities.
· Rehabilitation or replacement of existing facilities.
· Major pieces of equipment.
· Cost of professional studies related to the improvement.
· Acquisition of land related to a community facility.
Capital outlays do not include:
*
The usual replacement of equipment and normal renovation with a cost of
less than $ 10,000.
*
Those facilities and improvements related' to the Capital Improvements
Element (CIE) of the City's Comprehensive Plan or maintain the Level of
Service of facilities identified in the CIE.
Generally, all outlays financed by long-term debt should be considered capital outlays.
9
.
-..-'
.
.
I I I I I I I I I I I
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE FUND. FUND BAlANCE
FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 FYOO FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05
ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAl. ACTUAl. ACTUAl. CURRENT PROPOSED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED
TRANSPORT A nON ""PACT FEE FUND
I I
REVENUES I
LICENSES, PERMITS & FEES 5571,213 $278,08-4 $282,993 $329,047 $210,560 $473,470 $267,285 $225,000 $225,000 $225,000 $225,000 $225,000
INTEREST $32,495 $79,851 $91,583 $113,880 $89,899 $85,000 $50,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
MISCELlANOUS $0 $0 $0 $0 $74 $0
TOTAL REVENUES $603,708 $357,935 $374,578 $442,927 $300,533 $538,470 $317.285 $235,000 $235,000 $235,000 $235,000 $235,000
PERCENT INCREASE 40,31" ..co,71 " 4.65" 18.25% -32.15" 79,17" -41,08" -25.93% 0.00% O. 00'll0 0.00% 0.00"
EXr'':~~S:::S
I RECURRING EXPENSEl> $10,444 $290 $18,488 $139,843 $55,617 ;as,ceo $100,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 , $50,000 $50,000
I CAPITAl OUTlAY $107,297 $78,792 $76,127 $419,792 $728,942 $600.000 $1,100,000 $500,000 $250,000 $0 $250,000 $0
I
TOTAL EXPENSES $117,741 $79,082 $92,813 $559,435 $782,559 $685,000 $1,200.000 $550,000 $300,000 $50,000 S3OO,ooo $50,000
I
REVENUESOVERIUNDERIEXPENSES $465,987 $278,853 $281,963 ($118,508) ($482,028) ($146,530) ($882.715) ($315,000) ($85,000) $185,000 ($65,000) $185,000
I
BEGINNING FUND BAlANCE $1,109,408 $1,595,373 $1,874,228 $2.156,189 $2,039,681 $1,557,6SS $1,411,125 $528,410 $213,410 $148,410 $333,410 $268,410
I
ENDlNG FUND BAlANCE $1,595,373 $1,874,228 $2,158.189 $2,039,681 $1,557,655 $1.411,125 $528,410 $213,410 $148,410 $333,410 $268,410 $453,410
I
I 1I11m SHEET ~
.
.
.
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE FUND
PROPOSED PROJECT EXPENDITURES BY YEAR
Project Project PROPOSED Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total Prior
Name Number 99/00 00/01 01/02 02103 03/04 04105
Moss Road - 00-0140-04 $1,100,000 $1,100,000
434 to 419
Fisher Rd. 01-0140-01 $500,000 $500,000
Paving
Bahama Rd, 02-0140-02 $250,000 $250,000
Paving
WJnter Springs ()4..O140-05 $250,000 $250,000
Blvd. (4 Lane)
$0
TOTAL $1,100,000 $500,000 $250,000 $0 $250,000 $0 $2,100,000 $0
PROPOSED PROJECT REVENUE SOURCE BY YEAR
Revenue project YEAR 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total Prior
Source Number 99/00 00101 01/02 02103 03/04 04105
Trans. Impact
Fee Fund
T.I.F.F. 00-0140-04 $1100000 $1,100,000
T,I.F,F. 01-0140-01 $500,000 $500,000
T,I.F,F. 02-0140-02 $250,000 $250,000
T.I.F,F. 04-0140-05 $250,000 $250,000
$0
TOTAL $1,100,000 $500,000 $250,000 $0 $250,000 $0 $2,100,000 $0
Approval Date:
Start Date:
Completion Date:
6/10I99.o001CIP.XLS
.
.
..
CAnTALIMPROVEMENTPROJECTREQUESTFORM
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
PROJECfNAME: Moss Road-S.R 434toS.R 419
LOCATION: Moss Road
SERVICE AREA: City
PROJECf NUMBER: #00-0140-04
PROJECf PRIORITY: Planned Expansion
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
Yes
CATEGORY CLASSIFICATION:
Other Services
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICA TION:
This project is for the widening of Moss Road from two to four lanes from S.R. 434 to S.R. 419.
This road is classified as a collector road-and it is an identified improvement in the Traffic
Circulation Element of the Comprehensive Plan.
RELA TIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECTIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
Needed to maintain the level of service for the Ranchland collector road system.
.
.
.
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
Transportation Impact Fee Fund
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR:
Staff/Personnel $0
Operation/Maintenance $0
Capital Outlay $1,100,000
TOTAL:
$1,100,000
$0
Offsetting Revenue:
NET OPERATING IMPACT:
$1,100,000
IMPACT ON REVENUE:
No impact on revenue.
00-0 }4()..{)4. wpd
~/}8199
.
.
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
PROJECT NAME: Fisher Road Imorovements
LOCATION: Ranchlands
SERVICE AREA: City
PROJECT NUMBER: #01-0140-01
PROJECT PRIORITY: Planned Expansion
IS PROJECf A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
Yes
DES CRIPTION/JU STIFICA nON:
This project is for drainage and paving improvements to Fisher Road. This road is classified as a
collector road and it currently has no drainage and is not paved, The lack of this improvement
does not allow this road to function as collector road during extreme weather conditions,
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECTIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
Needed to maintain the level of service for the Ranchland collector road system.
PROPOSED METHOD OF FlNANCING:
Transportation Impact Fee Fund
.
..
.
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR:
Stafl7Personnel $0
OperationIMaintenance $0
Capital Outlay $500,000
TOTAL: $500,000
Offsetting Revenue: $0
NET OPERATING IMPACT:
$500,000
IMPACT ON REVENUE:
No impact on revenue,
02-a141-al.wpd
6/10/99
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT:
PROJECT NAME:
Public Works
Bahama Road Improvements
LOCA nON: Ranchlands
SERVICE AREA: City
PROJECT NUMBER: #02-0140-02
PROJECT PRIORITY: Planned Expansion
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
Yes
. DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION:
(Hayes Road to Shore Road). This road is classified as a collector road that is currently without
drainage and paving. The lack of this improvement does not allow this road to function as a
collector road during extreme weather conditions.
RELA TIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECTIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
Needed to maintain the level of service for the Ranchland collector road system.
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
Transportation Impact Fee Fund
.
.
.
.
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR:
Staff7Personnel $0
OperationIMaintenance $0
Capital Outlay $250,000
TOTAL: $250,000
Offsetting Revenue: $0
NET OPERATING IMPACT:
$250,000
IMPACI' ON REVENUE:
No impact on revenue,
0~14()..()2.wpd
6/10/99
.
.
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
PROJECT NAME: Winter Sprin1!s Boulevard Turn Lanes
LOCA nON: Tuscawilla
SERVICE AREA: City
PROJECT NUMBER: #04-0140-05
PROJECT PRIORITY: Planned Expansion
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL Il\1PROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREl\1ENT?
Yes
CATEGORY CLASSIFICATION:
Concurrency
DESCRIPTlON/JUSTIFICA TION:
This project is for the addition ofturn lanes on Winter Springs Boulevard form the eastern end of
the northern loop o.fNorthern Way to the eastern end of the southern loop of Northern Way.
This project eliminates a projected deficiency in the level of service for Winter Springs Boulevard,
RELA nONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECTfPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
Needed to maintain the level of service for Winter Springs Boulevard as identified in the Traffic
Circulation Element of the Comprehensive Plan,
.
.
.
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
Transportation Impact Fee Fund
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR:
StaID'PersonneJ $0
Operation/Maintenance $0
Capital Outlay $250,000
TOTAL:
$250,000
$0
Offsetting Revenue:
NET OPERATING IMPACT:
$250,000
IMPACT ON REVENUE:
No impact on revenue,
04-0140-05.wpd
5/18/99
.
.
.
T I I T I I I
FUND. FUN O-UIDCI
I FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 FYOO FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05
I ACTUAl ACTUAl.. AC1UAl. ACTUAl.. ACTUAl.. CURRENT PROPOSED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED
I
R&VENUES:
INTERGOVNMENT REVENUES $205.785 $205,502 $214.584 $195.954 $189.958 $218,000 $225,000 $225,000 $230,000 $235,000 $240,000 $245,000
INTEREST $26.804 $30,451 $18.991 $3,780 $2,134 $250 $2aO $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000
MlSCEUANOUS SO SO $31,870 SO SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
I
TOTAL REVeNUES ID2,3a SZH,IA $283,246 $1.,734 $112,G82 U1.,250 5226,210 $228.000 W1,OOO $231,000 $241,000 $246,000
I PERCENT INCREASE -7,43% 1.54... 11.57'" -24,13% -3,83'111 12.58% 4.16% 0,33% 2.21% 1.73% 2.55% 2.07%
T I
DPEHSES I
RECURRING EXPENSES $28,558 $98,029 $151,020 $45,180 $93,102 $54,400 $47,120 ~.OOO $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000
CAPITAl.. OUTlAY 10 $356.147 $347,132 $50,248 $403.081 $1~,OOO $140.000 $130,000 $150.000 $130,000 5150,000 $130,000
VEHIClES 10 SO $0 SO $18,950 $24,000 $22,000 $0 $22,000 $0
OTHER EQUIPMENT $51,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
TOTAL EXPEH86S I S28,5II $411,178 $4S8, 162 _,429 ......,83 $188,310 S212,12O $212,000 $210,000 S212,000 $210,000 $190,000
IPERCENT INCREASE -88.72'" 1479,97% 10,41% -80,84% 419,95% -80.02% 32.15% -19,12% ~,94% 0.95% ~.94% -9.52%
T I
R&VENUEa OVER lUHDI!Rl &XPEN8ES $203,81. 1$211,2231 lS234,I07] $104,105 ($304,0111 117,100 lsas,8701 $1.[000 $21 ,000 m,ooo $31,000 _,000
T I
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $102,083 $708,lNlI S4IO,II3 $251,77'8 S3IO,081 $11,880 m.ao $37,Cl2O $11,020 $72,020 SH.02O $128,020
T I
ENDING RJND 8A&.ANC6 $701'- $410,181 $2II,m S3i0,081 S&I,StO $71,880 $37,G20 $11,020 572,020 St6,020 $128,020 $182,020
T I
I I 7129199 S>ed1J2
.
.
.
PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORT A TION IMPROVEMENT FUND
PROPOSED PROJECT EXPENDITURES BY YEAR
Project Project Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total
Name Number 99/00 00/01 01/02 02103 03104 04105
Pubflc Works CompOUnd ()()'()104-01 $50 000 $50 000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $250,000
ResurfaclnalUnderdlalns ()().()104-02 $140,000 $130,000 $150,000 $130,000 $150,000 $130,000 $830 ,000
TOTAL $140,000 $180,000 $200,000 $180,000 $200,000 $180,000 $1,080,000
PROPOSED PROJECT REVENUE SOURCE BY YEAR
Revenue Project Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total
Source Number 99100 00101 01/02 02103 03/04 04105
Local ODtion Gas Tax ()()'()104-01 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $250,000
Local Option Gas Tax ()()'()104-02 $140,000 $130,000 $150,000 $130,000 $150,000 $130,000 $830,000
TOTAL $140,000 $180,000 $200,000 $180,000 $200,000 $180,000 $1,080,000
,PROPOSED EQUIPMENT EXPENDITURES BY YEAR
PROPOS
EoulDment Project Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total
Name Number 99/00 00/01 01102 02103 03/04 04105
Vehicle Cl()..()104-04 $24,000 $22 000 $22 000 $22,000 $90,000
Other Equicment Cl()..()104-07 $10,000 $10,000 $10000 $10000 $10,000 $50,000
Tractor/Bushhoa 00-0104-07 $50,000 $50,000
TOTAL. $74,000 $32,000 $10,000 $32,000 $10,000 $32,000 $190,000
ED EQUIPMENT REVENUE SOURCE BY YEAR
Revenue Proiect Proiected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total
Source Number 99/00 00101 01/02 02103 03/04 04105
Local Oction Gas Tax 00-4411-04 $24,000 $22,000 $22,000 $22,000 $90 ,000
Local Ootion Gas Tax 00-0104-07 $10,000 $10,000 $10000 $10,000 $10,000 $50,000
Local Option Gas Tax 00-0104-07 $50,000 $50,000
TOTAL $74,000 $32,000 $10,000 $32,000 $10,000 $32,000 $190,000
Approval Date:
Start Date:
Completion Date:
7129199-9798,CIP
..
.\
'J
:.
)
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
PROJECT NAME:
Public Works Compound
LOCATION:
To Be Determined
SERVICE AREA:
City
PROJECT NUMBER:
#00-0104-01
PROJECT PRIORITY:
Future Need
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUmEMENT?
No
DESCRlPTION/JUSTIFICA TION:
The current Public Works complex is composed of multiple highly deteriorated plywood and
tarpaper structures that were largely constructed in house. The current compound also suffers
from a traffic circulation problem and lack of space. A new facility is needed to meet the Public
Works demands of the City.
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECTIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
No relationship to other projects,
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING :Transportation Improvement Fund- Local Option
Gas Tax
.
.:. -\
.
).
.
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR:
StafflPersonnel. $0
OperationIMaintenance $0
Capital Outlay $50,000/year
TOTAL:
$50,OOO/year
$0
Offsetting Revenue:
NET OPERATING IMPACT:
$50 ,OOO/yea r
IMPACT ON REVENUE:
No impact on revenue,
OO~ 1 04-OO.wpd
4130/99
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
PROJECT NAME: Street Resurfac;nJ!
LOCA TION: Throughout City
SERVICE AREA: City
PROJECT NUMBER: 00-0104-02
PROJECT PRIORITY: RepairlReplacement
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
No
. DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFlCA TION:
)
.
This project is for the annual resurfacing of City streets.
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECTIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
The resurfacing is located throughout the City.
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
Transportation Improvement Fund- Local Option Gas Tax
.
. "
. )
.
)
.J
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR:
StafflPersonnel
$0
OperationlMaintenance
$0
Capital Outlay
$150,000/$130, 000 (Alternate years)
TOTAL:
$150,000/$130,000
Offsetting Revenue:
$0
NET OPERATING IMPACT:
$150,000/$130,000
IMPACT ON REVENUE:
No impact on revenue.
00.0 I 04-02.wpd
4130199
.
',',."....)
. .
.\
)
.i
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
PROJECT NAME: Vehicles
LOCATION: Administration
SERVICE AREA: City
PROJECf NUMBER: #00-0104-04
PROJECf PRIORITY: Replacement
IS PROJECf A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
No
DESCRIPTION/JUSTlFICA nON:
This is for the replacement of Public Works operations vehicles. The fund sources for the
replacement of one vehicle per year is alternated between General Fund and the Transportation
Improvement Fund.
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECfIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
No relationship with other projects,
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
Transportation Improvement Fund
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR:
.
S taff/Personnel $0
OperationIMaintenance $0
Capital Outlay $22,000
TOTAL: $22tooo
Offsetting Revenue: $0
NET OPERATING IMPACT:
$22tooo
IMPACT ON REVENUE:
.,
.,
No impact on revenue.
.
6130199~1Q4.(}4,wpd
)
.
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
PROJECT NAME: Eauioment Expenditures
LOCATION: Administrative
SERVICE AREA: City
PROJECT NUMBER: #00-0104-07
PROJECT PRIORITY: Replacement
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMF;NT REQUIREMENT?
No
. DESCRlPTION/JUSTIFICA nON:
Equipment needs to be replaced and new equipment added to keep abreast of the future workload
and needs. Tractor/Bushhog needed in the 1999/2000 budget year. Additional requirements
$lO,OOO.OO/year thereafter.
RELA TIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECTIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
None
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
Public Works Transportation Improvement Fun.<i.
.
-, .'
.)
.:.)
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR:
Staff/Personnel $0
Operation/Maintenance $0
Capital Outlay
TOTAL:
$50,000 first year & $1 O,OOO/yr thereafter,
$50,000 fint year & $10,000/yr thereafter
$0
($50,OOO)/yr. x (1) + $10,OOO.OO/yr thereafter
Offsetting Revenue:
NET OPERATING IMPACT:
IMPACT ON REVENUE
No impact on revenue.
20.3600-6' ,wpd
.
.
.
SEMINOLE COUNTY TRAFFIC CIRCULATION PROJECTS
PROPOSED PROJECT EXPENDITURES BY YEAR
Project Project Current Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total
Name Number 98/99 99/00 00/01 01102 02/03 03/04 04105
Undesignated Funds 0595 $1 315500 $1,315,500
Oak Forest Wall 0143A $292.000 $292,000
North Moss Road Improvements 0599 $1 000 000 $1,000,000
TuskawiBa Rd. from East Lake Dr,
to Winter Springs Blvd. 0143 $4 955.394 $4,955,394
TuskawiUa Rd, from W,S. Blvd, to
S,R. 434 0144 $7 054 536 $7,054,536
Brick Pavers at WSB 0145 $192,500 $192,500
TqTAl $12,494,430 $1,000,000 $1,315,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 514,809,930
Note: Projects #0143 and #0144 are cost estimates based on 1993 Seminole County C,I,E.
PROPOSED PROJECT REVENUE SOURCE BY YEAR
Revenue Project Current Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 YearS Total
Source Number 98188 98/00 00/01 01102 02/03 03/04 04105
1 Cent Infrastructure Sales Tax 0595 $1,315500 $1,315,500
1 Cent Infrastructure Sales Tax 0143A $292,000 $292,000
1 Cent Infras1ruc:ture Sales Tax 0599 $1,000,000 $1 000,000
1 Cent Infrastructure Sales Tax 0143 $4,955,394 $4,955,394
1 Cent Infrastructure Sales Tax 0144 $7,054,536 $7 054,536
2 Cent Infrastructure Sales Tax 0145 $192,500 $192,500
TOTAL $12,494,430 $1,000,000 $1,315,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $14,809,930
Completion Date:
Approval Date:
Start Date:
111 lJljl-alllK1P.JllS
CAPITAL OUTLAY PROJECTS
.
, Project Item Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total
FY 99/2000 FY 2000/01 FY 2001/02 FY 2002103 FY 2003/04
Rescue 26 $140,000 $140,000
Car 1 / Fire Marshal $18,000 $18,000
Thermal Imager $22,000 $22,000
Air Cascade Compressor $20,000 $20,000
Hydraulic Rescue Tool $25,000 $25,000
Engine 124 $280,000 $280,000
Station 3 $800,000 $800,000
Engine 3 $345,000 $345,000
Rescue 3 $190,000 $190,000
TOTAL $180,000 $20,000 $25,000 $280,000 $1,335,000 $1,840,000
Operating Impact Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 YearS Total
FY 99/2000 FY 2000/01 FY 2001/02 FY 2002103 FY 2003/04
Rescue 26 $0
Car 1/ Fire Marshal $0
Thermal Imager $0
Air Cascade Compressor $0
Hydraulic Rescue Tool $0
Engine 124 $0
Station 3 $680,000 $680,000
Engine 3 $10,000 $10,000
Rescue 3 $15,000 $15,000
TOTAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $705,000 $705,000
.
Revenue Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year S Total
FY 99/2000 FY 2000/01 FY 2001/02 FY 2002103 FY 2003/04
General Fund $40,000 $20,000 $25,000 $280,000 $365,000
Medical Transport Fund $140,000 $190,000 $330,000
Impact Fees $1,145,000 $1,145,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
TOTAL $180,000 $20,000 $25,000 $280,000 $1,335,000 $1,840,000
Approval Date:
Start Date:
Completion Date:
.
.
.
.
FIRE DEPARTMENT I MEDICAL TRANSPORT
PROPOSED PROJECT EXPENDITURES BY YEAR
Project Project Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year3 Year4 Year 5 Total Prior
Name Number 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05
Rescue 26 98-2210-002 $140,000 $140,000
Car 1 / Fire Marshal Vehicle 99-2210-002 $18,000 $18,000
Thermal Imager 98-2210-004 $22,000 $22,000
Air Cascade Compressor 99-2210-001 $20,000 $20,000
Hydraulic Rescue Tool 00-2210-001 $25,000 $25,000
Engine 124 01-2210-001 $280,000 $280,000
Station 3 02-2210-001 $800,000 $800,000
Engine 3 02-2210-002 $345,000 $345,000
Rescue 3 02-2210-003 $190,000 $190,000
TOTAL $0 $40,000 $45,000 $280,000 $1,145,000 $190,000 $1,840,000 $0
PROPOSED PROJECT REVENUE SOURCE BY YEAR
Revenue Project Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 YearS Total Prior
Source Number 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05
Medical Transport Fund 98-2210-002 $140,000 $140,000
General Fund 99-2210-002 $18,000 $18,000
General Fund 98-2210-004 $22,000 $22,000
General Fund 99-2210-001 $20,000 $20,000
General Fund 00-2210-001 $25,000 $25,000
General Fund 01-2210-001 $280,000 $280,000
Fire Impact Fees 02-2210-001 $800,000 $800,000
Fire Impacl Fees 02-2210-002 $345,000 $345,000
Medical Transport Fund 02-2210-003 $190,000 $190,000
TOTAL $140,000 $40,000 $45,000 $280,000 $1,145,000 $190,000 $1,840,000 $0
.
.
.
FIRE DEPARTMENT I MEDICAL TRANSPORT
PROPOSED PROJECT OPERATING IMPACT BY YEAR
Revenue Project Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year4 Year 5 Total Prior
Source Number 99/00 00/01 01102 02/03 03/04 04/05
Rescue 26 98-2210-002 $0
Car 1 / Fire Marshal Vehicle 99-2210-002 $0
Thennallmager 98-2210-004 $0
Air Cascade Compressor 99-2210-001 $0
Hydraulic Rescue Tool 00-2210-001 $0
Engine 124 01-2210-001 $0
Station 3 02-2210-001 $680,000 $680,000
Engine 3 02-2210-002 $10,000 $10,000
Rescue 3 02-2210-003 $15,000 $15,000
TOTAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $690,000 $15,000 $705,000 $0
Approval Date:
Completion Date
8/09/99-9899CIP .XLS
.
.
..
1999-2000
CAPITAL OUTLAY PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT:
Fire
PROJECT NAME:
Replacement of Rescue unit # 26
LOCATION:
850 Northern Way
SERVICE AREA:
Station 26
PROJECT NUMBER:
98-2210-002
PROJECT PRIORITY:
3
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT: No
CATEGORY CLASSIFICATION:
Concurrency:
Non-concurrency (Public Safety): X
Other Services (Non-concurrency, Non-Public Safety):
DESCRIPTION / JUSTIFICA nON FOR CAPITAL OUTLAY AND ANY ASSOCIAlED
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: Replacement of the 1988 Ford F-350 Wheel Coach Type I
rescue vehicle that was originally purchased in 1989. This vehicle will have been in service for 10
years as a front line unit. The unit will remain in service for 5 years as a reserve unit at which time
the unit will be surplused.
Staff/Personnel: No additional personnel is associated with this project
Operation/Maintenance: Replacement vehicle - No additional operations or maintenance costs
Capital Outlay: $ 140,000
TOTAL: $ 140,000
RELA TIONSHlP TO OTHER PROJECTS/PLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
None
PROPOSED METHOD OF FfNANCING:
General Fund - Vehicles
Medical Transport Fund
.
1999-2000
CAPITAL OUTLAY PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEP ARTMENT:
Fire
PROJECf NAME:
Replacement of the Fire Prevention Vehicle - Car I
LOCATION:
102 North Moss Road
SERVICE AREA:
Station 24 and Station 26
PROJECf NUMBER:
99-2210-002
PROJECf PRIORITY:
3
IS PROJECf A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT: No
CATEGORY CLASSIFICATION:
Concurrency:
Non-concurrency (Public Safety): X
Other Services (Non-concurrency, Non-Public Safety):
.
DESCRIPTION I JUSTIFICA nON FOR CAPITAL OUfLA Y AND ANY ASS'OCIA TED
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACf: Replacement of the 1988 Ford Crown Victoria that was
originally purchased as the Fire Chiefs car in 1988. This vehicle has been in service for 12 years
as a front line writ. This writ will be surplused
StaffJPersonnel: No additional personnel is associated with this project
OperationIMaintenance: Replacement vehicle - No additional operations or maintenance costs
Capital Outlay: $ 18,000
TOTAL: $ 18,000
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECTSIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
None
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
General Fund - Vehicles
.
.
1999-2000.
CAPITAL OUTLAY PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEP ARTMENT:
Fire
PROJECT NAME:
Thermal Imager
LOCATION:
102 North Moss Road
SERVICE AREA:
Station 24 and Station 26
PROJECT NUMBER:
98-2210-004
PROJECT PRIORITY:
4
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT: No
CATEGORY CLASSIFICATION:
Concurrency:
Non-concurrency (Public Safety): X
Other Services (Non-concurrency, Non-Public Safety):
.
DESCRIPTION / JUSTIFICATION FOR CAPITAL OUTLAY AND ANY ASSOCIATED
OPERATING BUDGET IMP ACf: This device will allow personnel to spot potential
patients/victims fu situations where sight is hampered by smoke, darkness, and obscured light
conditions. This device will be carried on the Battalion Chiefs vehicle which responds to all
serious nature alarms in the City. This device could also spot potentially lost victims in wooded
areas. This would augment the Departments ability to perform rescues in a quicker manner by
spotting the victims utilizing their body heat,
Staff/Personnel: None required
OperationIMaintenance: No additional costs associated with this project
Capital Outlay: $ 22,000
TOTAL: $ 22,000
RELA TIONSIDP TO OTIffiR PROJECTS/PLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
None
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
General Fund - Equipment
.
.
.
.
1999-2000
CAPITAL OUTLAY PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEP ARTMENT:
Fire
PROJECT NAME:
Air Cascade System Compressor
LOCATION:
102 North Moss Road
SERVICE AREA:
Station 24 and Station 26
PROJECT NUMBER:
99-2210-001
PROJECT PRIORITY:
3
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT: No
CATEGORY CLASSIFICATION:
Concurrency:
Non-concurrency (Public Safety): X
Other Services (N?n-concurrency, Non-Public Safety):
DESCRIPTION / JUSTIFICATION FOR CAPITAL OUfLA Y AND ANY ASSOCIATED
OPERATING BUDGET IMP ACT: The Air Cascade Compressor compresses the air that is
breathed by Fire Fighters and Water Department personnel when they are entering or working in
hazardous atmospheres. The Self Contained Breathing Apparatus air must meet air quality
standards. Every 3 months an air sample is taken and sent away for analysis. Due to the age of the
compressor and the use it gets we anticipate the compressor's replacement on a 15 year interval.
The replaced unit will be swplused at City Auction or traded in on the new one.
Staft/Personnel: No additional personnel is associated with this project
OperationIMaintenance: Replacement equipment - No additional operations or maintenance costs
Capital Outlay: $ 20,000
TOTAL: $ 20,000
RELATIONSHIP TO OTIlER PROJECTS/PLANS AND TIlE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
None
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
General Fund - Other Equipment
.
.
.
1999-2000
CAPITAL OUTLAY PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEP ARTMENT:
Fire
PROJECT NAME:
Replacement Hydraulic Rescue Tool
LOCATION:
850 Northern Way
SERVICE AREA:
Station 24 and Station 26
PROJECT NUMBER:
00-2210-001
PROJECT PRlORITY:
3
IS PROJECf A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT: No
CATEGORY CLASSIFICATION:
Concurrency:
Non-concurrency (Public Safety): X
Other Services (Non-concurrency, Non-Public Safety):
DESCRIPTION I JUSTIFICATION FOR CAPITAL OUTLAY AND ANY ASSOCIATED
OPERATING BUDGET IMP ACf: The Hydraulic Rescue Tool is 11 years old and is scheduled
to be replaced_ This unit is houSed at Fire Station 26 and is carried on Engine 26.
StafflPersonnel: None required
Operation/Maintenance: No additional costs associated with this project
Capital Outlay: $ 25,000
TOTAL: $ 25,000
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECTSIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
None
PROPOSED METIIOD OF FINANCING:
General Fund - Equipment
.
.
.
1999-2000
eAPIT AL OUTLAY PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEP ARTMENT:
Fire
PROJECT NAME:
Replacement of Engine # 124
LOCATION:
102 North Moss Road
SERVICE AREA:
Station 24 and Station 26
PROJECT NUMBER:
01-2210-001
PROJECT PRIORITY:
3
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL Th-1PROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT: No
CATEGORY CLASSIFICATION:
Concurrency:
Non-concurrency (Public Safety): X
Other Services (Non-concurrency, Non-Public Safety):
DESCRIPTION I JUSTIFICATION FOR CAPITAL OUTLAY AND ANY ASSOCIATED
OPERATING BUDGET Th-1PACf: Replacement of the 1981 Grumman White Expediter II
Tanker Pumper that was originally purchased as a reserve pumper in 1981. lIDs vehicle has been
in service for 18 years as a reserve unit and a special call unit for areas that have no fire hydrants.
11lls is due to its large water carrying capacity 1300 gallons, most pumpers carry only 750 gallons.
lIDs unit will be surplused. .
Staff/Personnel: No additional personnel is associated with this project
OperationIMaintenance: Replacement vehicle - No additional operations or maintenance costs
Capital Outlay: $ 280,000
TOTAL: $ 280,000
RELATIONSHIP TO OTIlER PROJECfSIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
None
PROPOSED METI-IOD OF FINANCING:
General Fund - Vehicles
.
1999-2000
CAPITAL OUTLAY PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEP ARTMENT:
Fire
PROJECT NAME:
Building of Fire Station # 3
LOCATION:
SR 434 and Creeks Bend subdivision area
SERVICE AREA:
SR 434 North East end of the City
PROJECf NUMBER:
02-2210-001
PROJECf PRIORITY:
4
IS PROJECf A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT: No
CATEGORY CLASSIFICATION:
Concurrency:
Non-concurrency (Public Safety): X
Other Services (Non-concurrency, Non-Public Safety):
.
DESCRIPTION I JUSTIFICATION FOR CAPITAL OUTLAY AND ANY ASSOCIATED
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: The building of this 3rd fire Station is due to the proposed
Commercial growth in the area of SR 434 near the Greenway. If this area should develop as we
anticipate Fire Station # 2 will not be able to efficiently handle the additional call1oad in that area
as well as have an acceptable response time of 5 minutes or less. This Fire Station would be the
result of growth and we anticipate revenue from impact fees to help fund this project.
StafflPersonnel: This Station would require 18 additional personnel
Operation/Maintenance: Additional associated building maintenance and utilities charges
Capital Outlay: $ 800,000 for the Station
TOTAL: $ 800,000 plus maintenance, utilities and additional personnel
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECfSIPLANS AND TIlE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
SR 434 commercial development
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
General Fund and Impact fees
.
.
.
.
1999-2000
CAPITAL OUTLAY PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEP ARTMENT:
Fire
PROJECf NAME:
Additional Engine for the new Station # 3
LOCATION:
SR 434 and Creeks Bend subdivision area
SERVICE AREA:
SR 434 North East section of the City
PROJECf Nill.1BER:
02-2210-002
PROJECf PRIORITY:
4
IS PROJECf A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT: No
CATEGORY CLASSIFICATION:
Concurrency:
Non-concurrency (Public Safety): X
Other Services (Non-concurrency, Non-Public Safety):
DESCRIPTION I JUSTIFICATION FOR CAPIT AL OUTLAY AND ANY ASSOCIATED
OPERATING BUDGET IMP ACf: The purchase of this new pumper is a result of proposed
growth in the SR 434 corridor. Due to the location of Station # 2 at 850 Northern way we feel the
response time to this area will be unacceptable and the call1oad will be increased. We anticipate
commercial growth due the completion of the widening ofSR 434. This 3rd pumper will be
serving this commercial area and will be serving as back up to the Tuscawilla area as well as the
west side of the City,
Stafflpersonnel: Personnel is projected in the New Station # 3 project
OperationIMaintenance: Additional vehicle maintenance and operational cost will be anticipated.
Capital Outlay: Pumper = $ 300,000 plus mnintenance and operational cost. Plus $45,000 for
additional equipment needed to put the unit in service.
TOTAL: $ 345,000
RELATIONSHIP TO OrnER PROJECTSIPLANS AND TIlE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
SR 434 commercial development
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
. General fund and Impact fees
.
1999- 2000
CAPITAL OUTLAY PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEP ARTMENT:
Fire
PROJECT NAME:
Additional Rescue for the new Station # 3
LOCATION:
SR 434 and Creeks Bend subdivision area
SERVICE AREA:
SR 434 North East section of the City
PROJECT NUMBER:
02-2210-003
PROJECT PRIORITY:
4
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT: No
CA TEGOR Y CLASSIFICATION:
Concurrency:
Non-concurrency (Public Safety): X
Other Services (Non-concurrency, Non-Public Safety):
. DESCRIPTION / JUSTIFICA nON FOR CAPITAL OUfLA Y AND ANY ASSOCIATED
OPERATING BUDGET IMPACf: The purchase of this new rescue is a result of proposed
growth in the SR 434 corridor. Due to the location of Station # 2 at 850 Northern Way we feel the
response time to this area will be unacceptable and the call load will be increased. We anticipate
commercial growth due the completion of the widening ofSR 434, This 3rd rescue will be serving
this commercial area and will be serving as back up to the Tuscawilla area as well as the west side
of the City.
Staff7Personnel: Personnel is projected in the New Station # 3 project.
OperationIMaintenance: Additional vehicle maintenance and operational cost will be anticipated.
Capital Outlay: Rescue = $ 150,000 plus maintenance and operational cost. Plus $40,000 for
additional equipment needed to put the unit in service,
TOTAL: $ 190,000
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECTS / PLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
SR 434 commercial development
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
General fund and Impact fees
.
Incorporated
~ 1959
~~
\oRtD~
FISCAL YEAR
1999/2000
~~
DANIEL J. KERB,
CHIEF OF POLICE
1
1
ii (~~ ,~ 7
.
.
.
CAPITAL OUTLAY PROJECTS
Project Item Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total
FY 99/2000 FY 2000/01 FY2001/02 FY2002l03 FY2003/04
Police HeadQuarters Expansion $0,00 $0,00 $165,000.00 $0,00 $0.00 $165,000.00
Vehicle Replacement $0.00 $0.00 $104,000,00 $104,000,00 $104,000.00 $312,000,00
TOTAL $0.00 $0.00 $269,000.00 $104,000.00 $104,000,00 $477,000,00
Operating Impact Total
Police HeadQuarters Expansion $0.00 $0.00 $0,00 $0,00 $0.00 $0.00
Increases for maintenance &
repairs of building, utility, telephone,
ianitorial, and office supplies
TOTAL $0,00 $0,00 $0,00 $0.00 $0,00 $0,00
Revenue Source Total
Impact Fees $0,00 $0.00 $165,000.00 $0,00 $0,00 $165,000,00
General Fund $0.00 $0.00 $104,000.00 $104,000.00 $104,000,00 $312,000.00
TOTAL $0,00 $0.00 $269,000.00 $104.000.00 $104,000.00 $477.000,00
Approval Date:
Start Date:
Completion Date:
1999-2000
. CAPITAL OUTLAY PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT: Police
PROJECT NAME: Public Safety Complex .Expansion
LOCA nON: 300 North Moss Road
SERVICE AREA: 300 North Moss Road
PROJECT NUMBER: 00-2110-002
PROJECT PRIORITY:
4
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT: NO
CATEGORY CLASSIFICATION:
Concurrency:
Non-concurrency (Public Safety): X
Other Services (Non-concurrency, Non-Public Safety):
.
DESCRIPTION / JUSTIFICA nON FOR CAPITAL OUTLAY AND ANY ASSOCIATED OPERATING
BUDGET IMPACT: The continuing growth of the City will require the Police Department to increase the
level of service provided to meet the needs of the community, This increase will take the form of new
programs created to enhance the Community Policing philosophy, as well as increasing personnel in
current services to meet expected increases in calls for service and investigation, To meet these needs, the
Police Department must complete the unfinished space of the facility, which were planned for future needs
and partially constructed at: the time the structure was built.
Due to the age of the fleet and the number of miles the vehicles travel each year there will be a need to
replace 5 vehicles a year starting FY 2001/2002, Each vehicle will cost $20,800,00 with a total cost of
$104,000,00 per year,
Staffi'Personnel: The Police Department is currently exploring new ways to provide additional services or
improve existing services to the community, This project deals with workspace that will be needed for
personnel who will already be in place at the time the expansion is needed. No additional personnel needs
are associated with this project.
OperationlMaintenance: JIncrease in the finished areas of the facility will require corresponding increases
for additional telephone service, utility expenses, repair and maintenance of the building, janitorial
supplies, and offIce supplies. Based on current figures available, the projected increases would total
$14,400 for the first year, and then recur for the following years as increases in the annual budget.
Capital Outlay: $477,000.00
.
TOTAL: $477,000.00
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECTS / PLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: None
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
Public Safety Impact F(:es
General Fund
FISCAL YEAR
1999/2000
CHUCK PULA,
PARKS & RECREATION DIRECTOR
1
~~ ~,~
.
.
CITY OF \Iv.. ,.=R SPRINGS
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
.
Project #
" .... J~roJ~'.-"":~~,:?:/:,/:~i,';;t i~'~:~~1~~~;:1 t~~~i~obj'j :;::i~1~~lJ~;t ,:;i~~~;t6~; ~;!~~~~1i:~~': ;::f.:,~~~::'\::{;J37~~!"J)'~.'~'... '. .oP(!~t,il'lg . .~. Totals -
..,.:..,.......~~~:~\; ': ;" '1~pact, .'
. :: C' .....;. ..'......:' .," /..'.'C :!: :':',;;","\'~'::..:.".;\ :.".' . .
Central Winds Park $ 170,000 Bond $ 8,500 $ 178,500
Moss Park $ 510,000 Bond $ 25,500 $ 535,500
Sam Smith Park $ 270,000 Bond $ 13,500 $ 283,500
Sunshine Park $ 430,000 Bond $ 21,500 $ 451,500
Trotwood Park $ 680,000 Bond/FRDAP Grant $ 34,000 $ 714,000
T orcaso Park $ 400,000 Bond $ 20,000 $ 420,000
Winding Hollow Park $ 140,000 Bond $ 7.000 $ 147,000
Central Winds Parking Lot Re-Pave $ 30,000 General Fund $ - $ 30,000
F-250 Class Pickup Truck $ 25,000 General Fund $ 1,250 $ 26,250
Lighting for Soccer Fields $ 300,000 Rental Fees x 10yrs. $ 15,000 $ 315,000
Community Center Land Acquisition $ 150,000 Gen Funds/Grant $ - $ 150,000
John Deere Reel Mower $ 32,000 General Fund $ 1,610 $ 33,610
Truf Vacumn Agi-Meter $ 10,800 General Fund $ 500 $ 11,300
T oro Top Dresser $ 10,500 . General Fund $ 500 $ 11,000
Community Center $1,500,000 Bond Issue $ 75,000 $ 1,575,000
John Deere 60" Deck Mower $ 15,000 General Fund $ 750 $ 15,750
Ford F150 4x2 Extended Cab $ 25,500 General Fund $ 1,275 $ 26,775
Toro Sand Pro $ 13,000 General Fund $ 650 $ 13,650
New Irrigation System CWP $ 75,000 General Fund $ 3,750 $ 78,750
New Playground CWP $ 75,000 General Fund $ 375 $ 75,375
VermeerTurbo Brush Chipper $ 25,000 General Fund $ 1,250 $ 26,250
CWP Swimming Pool $ 2,500,000 Bond/Grants $ 125,000 $ 2,625,000
T oro Work Cart w/PTO $ 18,000 General Fund $ 900 $ 18,900
TOTALS $ 2,955,000 $ 203,300 $ 1,553,500 $ 175,000 $ 2,518,000 $ 357,810 $ 7,762,610
PROPOSED PROJECT EXPENrnTURES BY YEAR
Prcip .xls
8/17/99
.
1999-2000
CAPIT AL IMPROVEl\'IENT PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEP ARTl\1ENT:
PARKS AND RECREATION
PROJECT NAME:
Local Parks Construction and Renovation Projects
LOCATION:
Trotwood, Torcaso, Moss, Sunshine, Sam Smith,
Central Winds Park and Winding Hollow Park
SERVICE AREA:
Entire City
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT PRIORITY: 1
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT? Yes
CATEGORY CLASSIFICATION:
Concurrency: Yes
.
Non-concurrency:
Other Services: (Non-concurrency, Non-Public Safety):
DESCRIPTION /JUSTIFICA TION FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT AND ANY
ASSOCIA TED OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT:
These parks are now serving at best 20% or less as they could. Most are old and in
ill repair. Also new construction is needed for the expanding youth baseball and
soccer programs.
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECTS/PLANS AND THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
Not necessary as existing parks are justified as primary in the inventory of service.
PROPOSED METHOOD OF FINANCING:
1.4 Million from bonds and $200,000.00 FRDAP Grant for Trotwood park.
$300,000.00 from rental fees over 10 years for soccer field lighting.
.
e
FISCAL YEAR
1999/2000
KIPTON LOCKCUFF, P.E.
~ UTILITY/PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR ~
.
.
.
I I I I I I I I
WATER & SEWER REVENUE GENERATION FUND - FUND BALANCE
FY94 FY95 FY98 FY97 FY98 FY99 FYOO FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FYOS
AC1\JAL. ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL. ACTUAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED
=JBl~ lITV
REVENUES:
INTEREST $5,970 $8,542 $0 $0 $0 $8,500 $9,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$50,. $51,313 $37.353 $58,706 $59,480 $51.008 $51.008 $51.ooe $51,008 $51,006 $51,006 $51.006
TOTA!. REVENUES $56.. $59.855 $37.353 $58,706 $59.480 $59,506 $60,506 551,006 $51,006 $51,006 $51,006 $51,006
PERCENT INCREASE .o.301L 5,32'11. -80.24'1(, 38.3~ 1~ 0,04" 1.65'1(, -18,63'1(, 0,00'1(, O.QO'I(, 0.00% 0.00'1(,
EXPENSES:
ICAPlTAL OUTlAY SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $33,387 $0 $100.000 $550,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000
TOTAL EXPENSES $0 $0 SO $0 $0 533,387 $0 $100,000 $550.000 $50,000 $50,000 $50.000
PERCENT INCREASE 0,00'1(, 0.00'1 0.00'll. O,()()'l(, 0.00'l6 100,QO'I(, 0.00'lf. 100.QO'I(, 81.82'll. -1000,00% o .QO'I(, O,OO'l(,
REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENSES $56,_ $58.855 $37.353 $58,706 $58,480 $28,119 $60.506 ($48.994) ($498,994) $1.006 $1.006 $1,006
BEGINNlNO FUND BALANCE $211,183 $267,851 $327,706 $365.059 $423,765 $483.245 $509,364 5569,870 $520,876 $21,882 $22.888 $23,694
ENDING FUND BALANCE $267.851 $327,706 $385,059 $423.765 $483,245 $509,364 $569,870 $520.878 $21,882 $22,888 $23,894 $24,900
8f2O/99 Sheet 14
.
.
.
I I
WATER AND SewER UTlUTY RENEWAL AND REPACEMENT FUND - FUND BALANCE
FY98 FY99 FYOO FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05
ACTUAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED
P ~AND~
& DlI:DI . FUND
REVENUES:
INTEREST $4,503 $4,800 $4,800 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
!NTERFUND TRA.tllSFERS-IN $12,754 $126 574 S140.310 $235,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000
TOTAL REVENUES $17;157 $131,374 $145,110 $235,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000
PERCENT INCREASE -1.00% 86.86% 9.47%
EXPENSES
CAPITAl OUTlAY $35,690 $122,000 $112,000 $235,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000
INTERFUND TRANSFERS-OUT $0 $9,374 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL EXPENSES $35,690 $131,374 $112,000 $235,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000
I PERCENT INCREASE 0.00%
REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENSES $0 $0 $33,110 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $260,429 $278,862 $288,236 $321,346 $321,346 $321,346 $321,346 $321 ,346
ENDING FUND BALANCE $278,862 $288,236 $321,346 $321,346 $321,346 $321,346 $321,346 $321,346
~1I6
.
.
.
PUBLIC WORKS - GENERAL FUND
PROPOSED EQUIPMENT EXPENDITURES BY YEAR
Pro ect
am.
$0
Prior
Vehicles
Dum Truck
TOTAL
$97 000
$22 000
$0
o
PROPOSED EQUIPMENT REVENUE SOURCE BY YEAR
Revenue ProJect projected Year 1 Year 2 Yur3 Year 4 YearS Total Prior
Source Number 99/00 00/101
General Fund 02-4410-03 $22000 $0 $22,000 $0 $44 000
General Fund 02-4410-02 $75 000 $0 $0 $0 $75000
TOTAL $0 $0 $97 000 $0 $22.000 $0 $119.000
Approval Date:
Start Date:
Completion Date:
713OJ9N798CIP .XLS
)
.'
.J
)
)
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
PROJECT NAME: Vehicles
LOCATION: Administration
SERVICE AREA: City
PROJECT NUMBER: #02-4410-03
PROJECT PRIORITY: Replacement
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
')
No
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFlCA nON:
This is for the replacement of Public Works operations vehicles. The fund source for the
replacement of one vehicle per year is alternated between General Fund and the Transportation
Improvement Fund.
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECTIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
No relationship with other projects.
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
General Fund
.i
.'
..J
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR:
Staff7Personnel $0
OperationlMaintenance $3,500
Capital Outlay $66,000
TOTAL: $69,500
Offsetting Revenue: $0
NET OPERATING IMPACT: $69,500
IMPACT ON REVENUE:
No impact on revenue,
6117199-xx-4410.03.wpd
eJ
::......, !
.
\
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
PROJECT NAME: Dumo Truck
LOCATION: Administration
SERVICE AREA: City
PROJECf NUMBER: #02-4410-02
PROJECf PRIORITY: Replacement
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
No
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICA TION:
This is for the replacement of the Public Works dump truck. The existing 12 yard tandem axle
dump truck was purchased in 1987 and needs to be replaced.
RELA TIONSHlP TO OTHER PROJECTIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
No relationship with other projects,
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
General Fund
)
.
./
)
.)
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR:
Staff!Personnel $0
OperationIMaintenance $0
Capital Outlay $75,000
TOTAL: $75,000
Offsetting Revenue: $0
NET OPERATING IMPACT: $75,000
IMPACT ON REVENUE:
No impact on revenue.
6/J0I99-02-44I 0-2.wpd
.
.
.
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
STORMWATER UTILITY FUND - FUND BALANCE
I I
I I FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 . FY99 FYOO FYOl FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05
I I ACTUAl ACTUAl ACTUAl ACTUAl ACTUAl CURRENT PROPOSED PROJECTED . P.ROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED
STORMWATER UTItTY FUND
REVENUES:
I INTEREST $4,564 $9,019 $5,896 $2,197 $2,586 $1,300 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000
USER CHARGES $285,591 $288,419 $298,562 $318,480 $325,453 $360,000 $360,000 $340,000 $345,000 $350,000 $355,000 $360,000
I
TOTAl REVENUES I $290,155 $297,438 S304,458 $320,677 $328,039 $361,300 $381,000 $341,000 $346,000 $351,000 $356,000 $361,000
PERCENT INCREASE 44.16% 2.45" 2.36%. 5.33% 2.30% 10.14% -0.08" -5.54" 1.47" 1.45% 1.42% 1 .4O'llo
I
EXPENSES I
CAPITAl PROJECTS $0 $36,319 $219,en $122,273 $128,142 $45,639 $90,000 $30,000 $126,000 $122,000 $98,000 $92,000
RECURRING EXPENSES $n,51 0 $318,631 $207,108 $197,452 $255,396 $245,194 $301,661 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000
EQUIPMENT I $0 $24,000 $55,000 $55,000 $55,000 $0 $0
I
TOTAl EXPENSES I $n,51 0 $354,950 $427,078 $319,725 $383,538 $290,833 $415,661 $335,000 $431,000 $427,000 $348,000 $342,000
I PERCENT INCREASE -21.61" 357.94" 16.89'l(, -33.58" 16.64% -31.88% 30.03" -24.08" 22.27" -094% -22.70"A> -1.75%
I
REVENUES OVER(UNDER) EXPENSES $212,645 ($57,512) ($122.620) $952 ($55,499) $70,467 ($54,661 ) $6,000 ($85,000) ($76,000) $8,000 $19,000
I I
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $75,453 $288,098 $230,586 $107,966 $108,918 $53,419 $123,886 $69,225 $75,225 ($9,775) ($85,n5) (sn,775)
I I
ENDING FUND BALANCE $288,098 $230,586 $107,966 $108,918 $53,419 $123,886 $69,225 $75,225 ($9,775) ($85,775) ($77,775) ($58,775)
I I ~
I I 7130199-SHEET 3
I I
.
.
.
'-
-'
STORMWA TER UTILITY
PROPOSED PROJECT EXPENDITURES BY YEAR
Project Project Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total Prior
Name Number 99100 00101 01/02 02103 03/04 04/05
Wade StTrash Removal Structure 00-4413-01 $90 000 $90 000
No Name Creek Swale & Culver1B 05-4413-06 $92,000 $92 000
Little Lake Howell RCP Culvert 01-4413-02 $30 000 $30 000
little Lake Howell Box Culvert 02-4413-03 $126 000 $126000
Gee Creek Sedimentation Pond 03-4413-04 $122 000 $122000
No Name Creek Drainaae Swales 04-4413-05 $98 000 $98,000
TOTAL $90 000 $30.000 $126.000 $122 000 $98 000 $92.000 $558.000 $0
PROPOSED PROJECT REVENUE SOURCE BY YEAR
Revenue Project Pr Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total Prior
Source Number 99100 00101 01/02 02/03 03104 04105
Stormwater Utilitv Fee 00-4413-01 $90 000 $90,000
Stormwater UbTrtv Fee 05-4413-06 $92,000 $92,000
Stormwater Utility Fee 01-4413-02 $30 000 $30 000
Stormwater Utility Fee 02-4413-03 $126,000 $126,000
Stormwater Utility Fee 03-4413-04 $122000 $122 000
Stormwater Utility Fee 04-4413-05 $98,000 $98,000
TOTAL $90.000 $30.000 $126.000 $122 000 $98 000 $92.000 $558.000 $0
.
.
.
STORMWATER unUTY
PROPOSEDEQ~MENTEXPENorrURES8YYEAR
Equipment Project Profected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total Prior
Name Number 99/00 00101 01102 02103 03104 04105
MultiPuniOse Vehicle 01-4413.10 $42.000 142.000
Vac Con 01-4413-11 $55.000 $55.000 $65 000 $185000
Bobcat 00-4413-12 $24,000 $24,000
TOTAL $24 000 $97000 $55000 $55.000 $0 $0 $231 000 $0
PROPOSED EQUIPMENT REVENUE SOURCE BY YEAR
Revenue -~. Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 YearS Total Prior
Source Number 99/00 00101 01102 02103 03104 04105
Stormwater utilffV Fee 01-4413-10 k2.000 542.000
Stormwater 0tiJitV Fee 01-4413-11 $55.000 $55.000 $55 000 $185 000
Stormwater Utility Fee 00-4413-12 $24,000 $24,000
TOTAL $24.000 $97.000 $55.000 $55.000 $0 $0 $231.000 $0
Approval Date:
Completion Date
lWlW8 9Hi~IP.JCLS
.1
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT:
Public WorkslStonnwater
PROJECT NAME:
Wade Street Trash Removal Structure
LOCATION:
Cross Creek at Wade Street
SERVICE AREA:
City
PROJECT NUMBER:
#00-4413-01
..
,..,
PROJECT PRIORITY:
Planned Addition
.)
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUmEMENT?
No
CATEGORY CLASSIFICATION:
Other Services
DESCRlPTION/JUSTIFICA TION:
This project provides for the installation ofa.trash removal structure in an existing drainage
channel known as Cross Creek for compliance with NPDES permit conditions. The trash
structure will capture debris from storm-water runoff prior to discharge to surface waters. The
project will be partially funded by a $30,000.00 grant from The St. Johns River Water
) Management District's Stonnwater ManagementCost-Sharing Program.
.
)
.'
RELA TIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECTfPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
Corrects an existing deficiency
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCJNG:
Stormwater Utility Fee
IMP ACT ON OPERA TJNG BUDGET BY YEAR:
StafflPersonnel $ 0
OperationIMaintenance $ 0
,\
I Capital Outlay $ 90,000
) TOTAL: $ 90,000
.
Offsetting Revenue: $ 0
NET OPERATING Il\1P ACT:
$
90,000
IMPACT ON REVENUE:
No impact on revenue.
)
00-4413-Ol.wpd
5/18/99
.
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT:
Public WorkslStonnwater
PROJECT NAME: No Name Creek Swale & Culvert Improvements
LOCA TION: Ranchlands
SERVICE AREA: City
PROJECT NUMBER: #05-4413-06
PROJECT PRIORI1Y: Planned Addition
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT ?
No
. CATEGORY CLASSIFICATION:
Other Services
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICA nON:
This project is for the construction of positive drainage swales with culverts, and the installation
of additional culverts at selected sites in the Ranchlands. This project was identified in the
Stormwater Master Plan 5 Year CIP.
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECTIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
.>
.
Adopted in the Stonnwater Master Plan,
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
Stormwater Utility Fee
.:
"'....,)
.
.>
.)
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR:
Staft/Personnel $0
Operation/Maintenance $0
Capital Outlay $92,000
TOTAL: $92,000
Offsetting Revenue: $0
NET OPERATING IMPACT:
$92,000
IMPACT ON REVENUE: No impact on revenue,
OS-4413-06.wpd
S/19/99
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEP ARTMENT:
Public WorkslStormwater
PROJECT NAME: Little Lake Howell RCP Culvert
LOCATION: Oak Forest - Chokecherry Drive
SERVICE AREA: City
PROJECT NUMBER: #01-4413-02
PROJECT PRIORITY: Planned Addition
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
No
. CATEGORY CLASSIFICATION:
Other Services
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICA TION:
This project is for the construction of an additional culvert for added flow from the tributary to
Little Lake Howell Creek from Dunmar Estates. This project was identified in the Stormwater
Master Plan 5 Year CIF,
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECfIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
Adopted in the Stormwater Master Plan.
) PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
Stormwater Utility Fee
.
.
,)
.
)
.
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR:
Staftlpersonnel $0
OperationIMaintenance $0
Capital Outlay $30,000
TOTAL: $30,000
Offsetting Revenue: $0
NET OPERATING IMPACT:
$30,000
IMPACT ON REVENUE:
No impact on revenue.
o 1-4413'{)2. wpd
5/18//99
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT:
Public WorkslStormwater
PROJECT NAME: Little Lake Howell Box Culvert Replacement
LOCA TION: Oak Forest -Winter Springs Boulevard
SERVICE AREA: City
PROJECT NUMBER: #02-4413-03
PROJECT PRIORITY: Replacement
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
No
. CATEGORY CLASSIFICATION:
',," ..\
Other Services
DESCRIPTIO N/JU STIFICA TION:
This project is for the replacement of the existing culverts and headwalls with a double 3' X 61 box
culvert for additional capacity. This project was identified in the Stormwater Master Plan 5 Year
ClP.
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECfIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
Adopted in the Stormwater Master Plan.
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
)
.
Stormwater Utility Fee
.
.
)
.
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR:
Statl7Personnel $0
OperationlMaintenance $0
, Capital Outlay
TOTAL:
Offsetting Revenue:
$126,000
$126,000
$0
NET OPERATING IMPACT:
$126,0 00
IMPACT ON REVENUE:
No impact on revenue,
02-4413.oJ.wpd
5/18199
.
.l
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEP ARTMENT:
PROJECT NAME:
LOCATION:
Public WorkslStormwater
Gee Creek Sedimentation Pond
Moss Road Bridge over Gee Creek
SERVICE AREA: City
PROJECT NUMBER: #03-4413-04
PROJECT PRIORITY: Planned Addition
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
No
CATEGORY CLASSIFICATION:
Other Services
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICA TION:
This project is for the construction ofa sedimentation/stonn water pond upstream of the Moss
Road bridge to prevent further siltation of the Gee Creek channel. This project was identified in
the Stormwater Master Plan 5 Year CIP,
RELA TIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECTIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
Adopted in the Stormwater Master Plan.
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
)
Stormwater Utility Fee
.
. 'j
.
)
.
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR:
Staff/Personnel $0
OperationlMaintenance $0
Capital Outlay $122,000
TOTAL: $122,000
Offsetting Revenue: $0
NET OPERATING IMPACT:
$122,000
Il\1PACT ON REVENUE:
No impact on revenue.
03-44 I3~4wpd
5/18199
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT: Public WorkslStormwater
PROJECT NAME: No Name Creek Draina1!e Swales
LOCA TION: North Orlando Sections 2 and 2A
SERVICE AREA: City
PROJECT NUMBER: #04-4413-05
PROJECT PRIORITY: Repair/Replacement
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
No
. CATEGORY CLASSIFICATION:
Other Services
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICA TION:
This proj~ct is for the regrading and reshaping of the roadside drainage swale system in North
Orlando Sections 2 and 2A. The swale drainage system is approximately twenty years old and has
been altered from the original design by the development of the homes in this area. This project
was identified in the Stormwater Master Plan 5 Year CIP,
RELA TIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECT/PLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
)
.
Adopted in the Stormwater Master Plan.
.
. "l
.
)
.
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
Stormwater Utility Fee
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR:
Stafflpersonnel $0
OperationIMaintenance $0
Capital Outlay $98,000
TOTAL: $98,000
Offsetting Revenue: $0
NET OPERA TING IMPACT:
$98,000
IMPACT ON REVENUE: No impact on revenue,
04-4413..()j,wpd
5118199
.
.J
.)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT:
PROJECT NAME:
LOCA nON:
SERVICE AREA:
PROJECT NUMBER:
ROJECT PRIORITY:
Public WorkslStonnwater
Multi Purpose Vehicle
Administration
City
01-4413-10
Planned Addition
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
No
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION:
The multi purpose vehicle is needed for the maintenance of stonnwater facilities, Many of the
facilities are off-road in difficult areas to access. We are limited in our current capability to
perform this task due to space entry difficulties and manpower limitations. This unit's capabilities
permit the operator to access the sites quickly and to work effectively in these restricted areas.
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECT/PLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
None
PROPOSED MEmOD OF FINANCING:
Stormwater Utility Fee
.)
.)
. .)
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR:
Staff/Personnel $0
OperationIMaintenance $0
Capital Outlay $42,000
TOTAL: $42,000
Offsetting Revenue: $0
NET OPERATING IMPACT: $42,000
IMPACT ON REVENUE:
No impact on revenue,
00-4413-Ol.wpd
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT: Public WorkslStormwater
PROJECT NAME: Vacuum Storm Drain C/eQnerUn;t
LOCATION: Administration
SERVICE AREA: City
PROJECT NUMBER: 01-4413-11
ROJECT PRIORITY: Planned Addition
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
No
. DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION:
The storm drain vacuum cleaning unit is needed for the removal of sand and debris from the
gravity storm drain manholes and collection points. We are limited in our current capability to
perform this task due to space entry regulations and manpower liriritations. This vacuum unit
removes materials by sucking them into a vacuum tank. All cleaning operations can be performed
from the surface by a single individual.
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECTIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
None
PROPOSED MEmOD OF FINANCING:
Stormwater Utility Fee
.
.
.
.
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR:
StatI7Personnel $0
Operation/Maintenance $ 1,000
Capital Outlay $164,000
TOTAL: 5165,000 ($55,OOO/yr for 3 years)
Offsetting Revenue: $0
NET OPERATING IMPACT: (5165,000)
IMPACT ON REVENUE:
No impact on revenue,
00-4413~ l.wpd
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT:
PROJECT NAME:
LOCATION:
SERVICE AREA:
PROJECT NUMBER:
ROJECT PRIORITY:
Public W oiks/Stormwater
Bobcat
Administration
City
01-4413-12
Planned Addition
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
. No
DESCRIPI10N/JUSTIFICA TION:
A Bobcat (small skiploader) is needed for the maintenance of stormwater facilities, We are limited
in our current capability to quickly perform the task ofloadinglunloading trucks and trailors and
to perform pick-up operations due to space difficulties and manpower limitations. This unit's
capabilities permit the operator to load and unload vehicles quickly and to work effectively in
moving heavy objects in restricted areas,
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECTIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
None
PROPOSED MEmOD OF FINANCING:
Stormwater Utility Fee
.
.
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR:
Staft7Personnel $0
Operation/Maintenance $0
Capital Outlay $24,000
TOTAL: $24,000
Offsetting Revenue: $0
NET OPERATING IMPACT: $24,000
IMPACT ON REVENUE:
. No impact on revenue,
004413-12-7130J99,wpd
.
.-
. -----.
.-.
-;,.'
.-
PROPOSED POTABLE WATER PROJECT EXPENOIT IRES BY YEA R
Project Project Current ProJected Year 1 YUl2 Vear3 Veal' 4 Yllarei Total
Name NumMr 9811S tSIOO 0010 1 01102 02103 03104 04105
Tu&kBYiIlIa Road Wlllllf Lilla 00-3600.18 $2:50 000 $250 000
CllloOOe Conv, To Liquid G WTP#2 00-3600-:58 $30,000 $30,000
Rani WTPll Chlorlnll Eouln OQ..3600-57 $25,000 $25,000
WTPI1 Brlck wen 00-3800-:58 $40,000 $40,000
1wrPt2-#3 WeR EmeraellCV POWIlr 00-3800-:59 $20,000 $20,000
Test WaU'4 QO.3699-60 $10,000 $10,000
WTPI1 Stontge Tenk Oomll RSSlHfaclng 01-3600.11 $25,000 525,000
WTP#1,2&3 Chlor1nll Convel'$lon 03-3600-03 $250,000 ~,ooo
IvJelIl4 WT?# 1 East 02-3800-12 $250,000 szso,OQO
\VfP#1 Pecked TOWll~ 04-3600-02 $2,000,000 $2,000,000
Addnlonel Pumos lIlld Conlrols WTPtl 05.3800-10 $12:5,000 5125,000
TOTAl. TOTAl. SO $376,000 125,000 $260,000 $260,000 $2.000,000 $125,000 $3,026,000
.. PROPOSED PROJECT REVENUE SOURCE BY YEAR
R....enue Project CUlTellt Pro/ec:1IMI Year 1 y.., 2 Yur3 Veal' .. Yur 5 Total
Source Number 98I9lI i9I'OO OCW1 01102 02J03 03104 04101
, U,C.F. 00-3600-18 $2:50,000 5250,000
U,E.F, 00-3600-:56 $30,000 $30,000
U,E.F, 00-3600-57 $25,000 $25,000
U.E.F, 00-3600-58 $40,000 $40,000
U.E.F. 00-3600.59 $20,000 520,000
U.E.F. 00-3600-60 $10,000 510,000
RlIlRF 01-3600-11 $2:5.000 $25,000
U.E,F, 03-36OO-a3 $250,000 $250,000
U.E.F, 02-3&00-12 $250,000 $250,000
U.E.F. 0~2 $2.000,000 $2.000,000
U,E.F, 05-3600.10 $125,000 $125,000
TOTAL TOTAL. SO $376,000 S21,ooo $2SO,ooo $260,000 S2,OOO,ooo 5125,000 $3,025,000
Approvel Dele:
Completion Dele:
~198OP.xlS
.
,
':'>J
.
)
)
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT: Utility
PROJECT NAME: Tuskawilla Road Utilitv Improvements
LOCA nON: Tuskawilla Road
SERVICE AREA: . City
PROJECT NUMBER: #00-3600- 18
PROJECT PRIORITY: Planned Expansion
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
No
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICA nON:
This project is to install water main extensions, force main crossings, reclaimed water line
crossings and future sleeves during the construction ofTuskawilla Road. This project will be
incorporated into the County's roadway construction job.
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECfIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
This project will be constructed in conjunction with Seminole County's Tuskawilla Road
improvements.
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING: :.'
Capital - Utility Construction Fund,
.
,
..
)
..
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR
StaIDPersonnel
$0
$0
$250,000
$250,000
$0
Operation/Maintenance
Capital Outlay
TOTAL:
Offsetting Revenue:
NET OPERATING IMPACT:
$250,000
IMPACT ON REVENUE:
.. "1 No impact on revenue.
00-3600-16.wpd
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT: Utility
PROJECT NAME: Chlorine Conversion @ WTP#2
WCA nON: 700 Sheoah Blvd.
SERVICE AREA: West
PROJECT NUMBER: 00-3600-56
PROJECT PRIORITY: Planned Experiment
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IM:PROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
No
e)
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICA nON:
)
.
Installing a liquid chJorine (sodium hypochJorite) system as the fint step in elimination
gaseous chlorine.
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECTIPLANS AND TEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
Water plant improvement
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
Capital - Utility Enterprise Fund.
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR:
.
.
)
.
StaIDPersonnel
Operation/Maintenance
Capital Outlay
TOTAL:
Offsetting Revenue:
NET OPERATING IMPACT:
IMPACT ON REVENUE:
No impact on revenue.
00-3600-.56.wpd
$0
$0
$30,000
$30,000
$0
($30,000)
1
.
,..;.,:.,' "
. i
.
)
)
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT: Utility
PROJECT NAME: Replace WTP#l Chlorine Equipment
LOCATION: 851 Northern Way
SERVICE AREA: East
PROJECT NUMBER: 00-3600-57
PROJECT PRIORITY: Planned Replacement
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
No
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICA nON:
Replace the chlorine equipment at WTP #1
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PRO.rtCTIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
Water plant maintenance
PROPOSED MEmOD OF FINANCING:
Capital - Utility Enterprise Fund,
.
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR:
Staff/PersoIUlel
OperationIMaintenance
Capital Outlay
TOTAL:
Offsetting Revenue:
NET OPERATING IMPACT:
IMP ACf ON REVENUE:
. ,.) No impact on revenue.
..
)
.
00-3600-S7wpd
)
$0
$0
$25,000
. $25,000
$0
($25,000)
.
..::,...,,:.}
)
.
)
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT: Utility
PROJECT NAME: Water Treatment Plant #1 Brick Wall
LOCATION: 851 Northern Way
SERVICE AREA: East
PROJECT NUMBER: 00-3600-58
PROJECT PRIORITY: Planned Improvement
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
No
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICA nON:
Replace the chain link fence and hedgerow with a brick waiL
RELA TIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECTIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
Water plant improvement.
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
Capital - Utility Enterprise Fund,
)
.
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR:
Staff/Personnel
Operation/Maintenance
Capital Outlay
TOTAL:
Offsetting Revenue:
NET OPERATING IMPACT:
IMPACT ON REVENUE:
. .. .; No impact on revenue,
.
)
.
00-3600-~8wpd
$0
$0
$40,000
$40,000
$0
($40,000)
)
.
....:'.::."
)
.
.
CAPIT AL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT: Utility
PROJECT NAME: Emer~encv Power Connection, WTP#2 & #3 Wells
LOCATION: 110 West Bahama Rd. and 700 Sheoah Blvd,
SERVICE AREA: West
PROJECT NUMBER: 00-3600-59
PROJECT PRIORITY: Planned Improvement
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
No
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICA nON:
Install an emergency power cOlBnection on the wells at WTP #2 and WTP #3 so the
emergency portable generator can operate the wells.
RELA TIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECf/PLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
Emergency preparedness.
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
.>
Capital - Utility Enterprise Fund.
I
.
.
)
)
.
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR:
Staff/Personnel
OperationIMaintenance
Capital Outlay
TOTAL:
Offsetting Revenue:
NET OPERATING IMPACf:
IMPACf ON REVENUE:
) No impact on revenue.
00-3600.59wpd
$0
$0
$20,000
$20,000
$0
($20,000)
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT:
PROJECT NAME:
LOCA nON:
SERVICE AREA:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT PRIORITY:
Utility
Test Well #4
WTP #1
East
00-3600-60
Planned Improvement
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
.)
No
DESCRIPTlON/JUSTIFICA nON:
Construct test well in preparation for the installation of well #4.
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECTIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
Planned potable water capital improv'ement.
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
Capital - Utility Enterprise Fund.
)
.
.
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR:
StatllPersonnel $0
Operation/Maintenance $0
Capital Outlay $10,000
TOTAL:
$10,000
$0
($10,000)
Offsetting Revenue:
NET OPERATING IMPACT:
IMPACT ON REVENUE:
. c-") No impact on revenue.
.
00-3600-00.wpd
)
.
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REOUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT: Utility
PROJECT NAME: WTP #1 Storalle Ttlltk Dome Resurfacilu!
LOCATION: WTP #1 - 851 Northern Way
SERVICE AREA: City
PROJECT NUMBER: #01 ~3600-11
PROJECT PRIORITY: Repair/Replacement
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
No
. DESCRIYfION/JUSTIFICATION:
This project is for the resurfacing of the interior dome of the one million gallon potable water
storage tank at WTP # I, The concrete surface is beginning to spall and needs to be recoated.
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECTIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
This project will enable us to maintain the existing level of service and will extend the life of the
storage tank.
PROPOSED MEmOD OF FINANCING:
Capital ~ Utility Renewal and Replacement Fund
.
.
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR
Staff7Personnel $0
Operation/Maintenance $0
Capital Outlay $25,000
TOTAL: $25,000
Offsetting Revenue: $0
NET OPERATING IMPACT: ($25,000)
. IMPAcr ON REVENUE:
No impact on revenue.
Ol.]600-11,wpd
.
..'
~"'" ,..)
.)
)
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT:
PROJECT NAME:
LOCATION:
SERVICE AREA:
PROJECf NUMBER:
PROJECf PRIORflY:
Utility
Chlorine Convet'$ion WTP #1
WTP #1 - 851 Northern Way
City
#03-3600-03
RepairlReplacement
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
No
DESCRIPTlON/JUSTIFICA nON:
Construct a liquid chlorine (sodium hypochlorite) feed and generation system to replace the
gaseous chlorine system.
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECfIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
Planned improvement.
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
Capital - Utility Enterprise Fund
-.
.
)
.
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR
Sta.IDPersonnel $0
OperationIMaintenance $0
Capital Outlay $250,000
TOTAL: $250,000
Offsetting Revenue: $0
NET OPERA TING IMPACT: ($250,000)
IMPACT ON REVENUE:
No impact on revenue.
02-J600-0J,wpd
.
,.-'.:. .)
"
e\
)
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT:
Utility
PROJECT NAME:
Water Supp/v Well #4
LOCATION:
WfP #1
SERVICE AREA:
City
PROJECT NUMBER:
#02-3600-12
ROJECT PRIORITY:
Planned Expansion
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT:
Yes
DESCRDnnON/JUS~CATION:
This project is for a fourth water supply well at WTP #1, that is located on Northern Way in
Tuscawilla. This well is needed to ensure an adequate volume of water is available. This project
has been postponed from its originally scheduled date because of pump improvements that were
made to Well #1 increasing the pumping volume and delaying the need for Well #4,
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECf/PLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
This project is identified in the CIE of the Comprehensive Plan,
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING
Capital - Utility Enterprise Fund,
.
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR
Staff/Personnel $0
OperationIMaintenance $0
Capital Outlay $250,000
TOTAL: $250,000
Offsetting Revenue: $0
NET OPERATING IMPACT: $250,000
IMPACT ON REVENUE:
. No impact on revenue,
02-J600-12.wpd
)
.
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT:
Utility
PROJECT NAME:
Packed Towers. WTP #1
LOCATION:
WTP #1 - 851 Northern Way
SERVICE AREA:
City
PROJECT NUMBER:
#04-3600-02
PROJECT PRIORITY:
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
.,;.:,.",,; No
\
. DESCRWTION/JUSTIFICATION:
Construct packed towers at WTP # 1 which use air to remove hydrogen sulfide from the new
potable water. This will reduce chlorine demand and improve the water taste and odor.
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECTIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
Water quality improvement project. .
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
Capital - Utility Enterprise Fund
)
\
.
.
.
)
.l
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR
Staff7Personnel $0
Operation/Maintenance $ 5,000
Capital Outlay $2,000,000
TOTAL:
$2,000,000
$0
($2,000,000)
Offsetting Revenue:
NET OPERATING IMPACT:
IMPACT ON REVENUE:
No impact on revenue,
04-360().()2. wpd
.
"j
.-
)
.
CAPITAL IMPR.OVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT:
PROJECT NAME:
LOCATION:
SERVICE AREA:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT PRIORITY:
Utility
Additional PumDs and Controls-WTP #1
WTP #1 - 851 Northern Way
East
#05.3600-10
Repair/Replacement
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
No
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFlCA nON:
Construct a fourth pump and associated controls at WTP # 1
RELA TIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECfIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
This project will enable us to maintain the existing level of service of potable water.
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
Capital - Utility Enterprise Fund
.
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR
StaffJPersonnel $0
Operation/Maintenance $0
Capital Outlay $125,000
TOTAL: $125,000
Offsetting Revenue: $0
....\
...,.... NET OPERATING IMPACT: ($125tOOO)
..i
IMPACT ON REVENUE: .
No impact on revenue.
05.3600-10,wpd
)
.)
.
PROPOafD SANITARY SEWER EXP&NDlTUREa r6Y YEAR
'": Project YaI" Year 2 YIIlIt'3 nar4 YearS TofaI
Numbel 8MJO 01102 02103 03104 04.105
Install Liner @ VWlRF 00-3600-19 $37,000
$37000
Replace Lampson BkMIer 00-3600-23 $30.000 $30,000
Lift Stillion a Plant OQ.36OO.27 $80,000 $80,000 $80,000 $240,000
T elemetry@$"80,OOOIyr
EWRF Underground EIactricaI Rehab 00-3600-61 $25,000 $25,000
East WRF Sand Remowl 00-3600-62 $50,000 $50,000
Design East Force Main QO.36OO.63 $28,000 $28,000
Sewer Line Restoration C!l $1oo,OlXlIyr 00-3600-38 $!iO,ooo $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $550,000
'WWRF SUrge Tank 01-3800-30 $900,000 $900,000
WWRF AIr Une Addition 01.3800-33 $5(1,000 $50,000
WWRF Plant 1 Painting 01.3800-37 $110.000 $110,000
WWRF Belt Pre8a 02.J600.34 $250,000 $250,000
EWWR Belt Press 02.3600-35 $250,000 $250,000
Scrubber for Gas Chlorine BIdg EWRF 02-3600-21 $100,000 $100,000
Sc;rubber b' Gas Chlorine Bldg 02.3000-22 $100,000 $100,000
WWRF
Automatic Bar Screen EWRF Q3.38CX).20 $100,000 $100,000
West Force Main Rerouting 05-3600-24 $105,000 $105,000
East Force Main Rerouting 05-3600-28 $150,000 $150,000
TOTAL S3OO,ooo " ,240,000 S880,ooo S2OCI.ooo "00,000 1355.000 $3,075.000
.
.
.
I"ROPOSED PROJECT REVENUE SOURCE ~, 'fEAR
.
Raw.nue project Projected Year 1 Vear 2 Year 3 Vear 4 Vear 5 Total
SocIRe Number - 00101 00f02 02103 03104 04J05
U.E.F. 00-J600.19 $37,000 $37,000
Rti)RF 00-3600-23 $30,000 $30,000
U.E.F. 00-3600-27 $80,000 $80,000 $80,000 $240,000
U.E.F. QO-36OO.61 $25,000 $25,000
U.E.F. 00-3600-62 $50,000 $50,000
U.E.F. CJO.36OO..63 528,000 $28,000
R@RF 00-3600-36 $50,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $550,000
U.E.F. 01-361>>-30 $900,000 $900,000
R.G.F. 01.J600.33 $50,000
RftRF 01-3600-37 $110,000 $110,000
R.G.F. 02.J600.34 $250,000 $250,000
R.G,F. 02.J600.35 $250,000 $250,000
U.E.F. 02-3600-21 $100,000 $100,000
U.E.F. 02-3600-22 $100,000 $100,000
U.E.F. 03-36QO.20 $100,000 $100,000
U.E.F. lJ5..36Ol).24 $105,000 5105,000
U.E.F. 05-3600-28 5150,000 $150,000
TOTAL S3OO._ 11.240.000 -- $2CIO,ooo ltoO,OOO 1355.000 13.075,000
Approval Date:
Completion Date:
iI2:ltI8M788C1P .xu
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FORM
D EP ARTMENT: Utility
PROJECT NAME: West Water Reclamation Facility Pond Relinin~
LOCATION: West WRF
SERVICE AREA: West
PROJECf NUMBER: 00-3600-19
PROJECT PRIORITY: Planned Improvement
IS PROJECf A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
No
.) DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION:
Install a membrane lining in the reject pond to eliminate exfdtration into the groundwater.
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECfIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
Wastewater Plant Improvement
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
Capital - Utility Enterprise Fund.
IMPACf ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR:
Stati7Personnel $0
..1
OperationIMaintenance
$0
.
Capital Outlay
TOTAL:
Offsetting Revenue:
NET OPERATING IMPACf:
IMPACT ON REVENUE:
No impact on revenue.
"') 00-3600-19wpd
.
)
.
$37,000
$37,000
$0
($37,000)
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REOUEST FO~
DEPARTMENT: Utility
PROJECT NAME: West Water Reclamation Facilitv Blower Reolacement
LOCATION: West WRF
SERVICE AREA: West
PROJECT NUMBER: 00-3600.23
PROJECT PRIORITY: Planned Improvement
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
No
. DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION:
Replacement or the third blower at the West WRF
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECTIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
Wastewater plant maintenance
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
Capital - Utility Renewal and Replacement Fund.
.
IMPACf ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR:
Staft7Personnel SO
OperationlMaintenance SO
.
.
.
Capital Outlay
TOTAL:
Offsetting Revenue:
NET OPERATING IMPACT:
IMPACT ON REVENUE:
No impact on revenue.
lJO.3600-23wpd
$30,000
$30,000
SO
(S30,000)
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJEcr REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT: Utility
PROJECT NAME: lift Station and Pl(lllt Telemetry
LOCATION: City Wide
SERVICE AREA: All
PROJECT NUMBER: 00-3600-27
PROJECT PRIORITY: Planned Improvement
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
'..) No
\
. DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION:
Install SCADA teJemetry system for monitoring lift station and plant alanns and controls.
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECTIPLANS AND THECOMPREBENSIVE PLAN:
System Improvement
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
Capital - Utility Enterprise Fund.
).
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR:
StatI7Personnel
$0
.
Operation/Maintenance
$0
.'
Capital Outlay
TOTAL:
Offsetting Revenue:
NET OPERATING IMPACT:
IMPACT ON REVENUE:
No impact on revenue.
..:i':';:..:l 00-3600-27 wpd
.1
.
)
$80,OOO/year for 3 years
$80,000 (Year 2000)
$0
($80,000)
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT:
PROJECT NAME:
LOCATION:
SERVICE AREA:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT PRIORITY:
Utility
East Water Reclamation Facilitv Unde1pround Electrical
Rehabilitation
1560 Winter Springs Blvd.
East
00-3600-61
Planned Improvement
. IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
No
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICA TION:
Relocate the electrical power service to the East WRF from overhead to underground.
RELA TIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECflPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
Emergency preparedness
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
)
Capital - Utility Enterprise Fund.
.
.1
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR:
Staff/Personnel $0
OperationiMaintenance
Capital Outlay
TOTAL:
Offsetting Revenue:
NET OPERATING IMPACT:
IMPACT ON REVENUE:
.,.:.,.~ No impact on revenue.
..,
)
.
00-3600-61 wpd
$0
$25,000
$25,000
$0
($25,000)
-.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PRQJECf REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT: Utility
PROJECT NAME: East Water Reclamation Faci/itv Sand Removal
LOCATION: East WRF
SERVICE AREA: East
PROJECT NUMBER: 00-3600-62
PROJECT PRIORITY: Planned Improvement
.J
.' IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
No
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICA nON:
Removal of accumulated sand in the East wastewater treatment plant.
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECI'IPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
Planned maintenance
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
)
Capital - Utility Enterprise Fund.
.
.
.
.
IMPACT ON OPERATING BlIJDGET BY YEAR:
Statl7Personnel $0
OperationlMaintenance $0
Capital Outlay S50,000
TOTAL:
Offsetting Revenue:
NET OPERATING IMPACT:
IMPACT ON REVENUE:
$50,000
$0
($50,000)
No impact on revenue.
00-J600.62wpd
.
eAPIT AL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT:
Utility
PROJECT NAME:
LOCATION:
SERVICE AREA:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT PRIORITY:
East Force Main Desi2n
East Wastewater Collection System
East
00-3600-63
Planned Improvement
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
.) No
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICA nON:
Design of the improvements to the East wastewater coUection system necessary to
accommodate future development.
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECTIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
Preparation for future growth.
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
)
Capital - Utility Enterprise Fund.
.
\
.
.'
.
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR:
StafflPersonnel
OperationIMaintenance
Capital Outlay
TOTAL:
Offsetting Revenue:
NET OPERATING IMPACT:
IMPACT ON REVENUE:
No impact on revenue.
00-3600-63.wpd
)
$0
$0
$28,000
$28,000
$0
($28,000)
.
CAPITAL IM:PROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT: Utility
PROJECT NAME: Sewer Line Restoration
LOCATION: Citywide
SERVICE AREA: City
PROJECf NUMBER: #20-3600-36
PROJECT PRIORITY: Repair/Replacement
., ') IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT:
.; No
,
.
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICA nON:
This project is to annually reline portions of the wastewater collection system.
RELA TIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECTIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
Planned refurbishment.
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
Renewal and Replacement Fund
)
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REOUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT: Utility
PROJECT NAME: East WRF Belt FilteI' Press
LOCATION: East WRF
SERVICE AREA: City
PROJECT NUMBER: #02-3600-35
PROJEer PRIORITY: Planned Expansion
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT:
No
. DESCRIPTION/JUSTlFICA TION:
This project is for the construction of a belt filter press at the East WRF. The belt filter press is
needed to handle the volume of solids being generated by this facility. A sludge vacuum bed is
currently utilized which is labor intensive and also requires several days drying time. A higher
solids content is achieved with the belt press which will reduce the volume of solids handled by
employees and by the sludge hauler.
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECTIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
This project will allow the treatment plant to handle increased solids attn1>utable to growth.
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
.
Utility Revenue Generation Fund.
.
.
.
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR:
Stafl7Personnel SO
OperationIMaintenance $0
Capital Outlay S2S0,OOO
TOTAL: $250,000
Offsetting Revenue:
NET OPERATING IMPACT:
SO
($250,000)
IMPACT ON REVENUE
No impact on revenue.
02-J6lJO.1S .wpd
..1
.j
)
.l
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REOUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT: Utility
PROJECT NAME: East WRF Scrubber
LOCATION: East WRF
SERVICE AREA: City
PROJECT NUMBER: #02-3600-21
PROJECT PRIORITY: Planned Expansion
IS PROJEcr A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
No
DESCRlPTION/JUSTIFICA nON:
Construct a gas scrubber system to contain and control leaks of gaseous chlorine.
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECT/PLANS AND WE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
Preventative safety improvement.
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
Utility Enterprise Fund.
.'
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR:
Staff7Personnel $0
OperationIMaintenance $0
Capital Outlay $100,060
TOTAL:
$100,000
Offsetting Revenue:
$0
NET OPERATING IMPACT:
($100,000)
IMPACT ON REVENUE
.::>.'.") No impact on revenue.
.)
)
.\
02-3600-21 :wpd
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REOUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT: Utility
PROJECT NAME: West WRF Scrubber
LOCA TION: East WRF
SERVICE AREA: City
PROJECT NUMBER: #02-3600-22
PROJECT PRIORITY: Planned Expansion
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
No
. i DESCRlPTION/JUSTIFICA nON:
Construct a gas scrubber system to contain and control leaks of gaseous chlorine.
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECTIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
Preventative safety improvement.
,
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
Utility Enterprise Fund.
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR:
StaffIPersonnel $0
) -
OperationIMaintenance $0
)
. Capital Outlay $100,000
.
.'
)
.1
TOTAL:
$100,000
. $0
($100,000)
Offsetting Revenue:
NET OPERATING IMPACT:
IMPACT ON REVENUE
No impact on revenue.
02-3600-12 .wpd
.
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT: Utility
PROJECT NAME: East WRF Bar Screen
LOCATION: East WRF
SERVICE AREA: City
PROJECT NUMBER: #03-3600-20
PROJECT PRIORITY: Planned Expansion
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
No
DESCRlPTION/JUSTIFICA TION:
Construct a bar screen at the East WRF to remove non-organics from the wastewater.
RELA TIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECTIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
Planned improvement.
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
Utility Enterprise Fund.
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR:
Staff/Personnel $0
OperationIMaintenance $0
) Capital Outlay $1.00,000
TOTAL: $100,000
. Offsetting Revenue: $0
\
.
'. .~)
)
.
)
.
NET OPERATING IMPACT:
($100,000)
IMPACT ON REVENUE
No impact on revenue.
03-3600-20.wpd
.>
e
...!,::-:;;:.~.:'..
ei
)
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT rROJECf REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT: Utility
PROJECT NAME: West Force Main Reroutine
LOCATION: Western Portion of Winter Springs
SERVICE AREA: West
PROJECT NUMBER: #05-3600-24
PROJECT PRIORITY: Repair/Replacement
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
No
DES CRIPTION/JU STIFlCA TION:
Construction of new force mains to accommodate and optimize wastewater flows to the
WRF from new developments.
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER JPROJECTIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
This project will enable us to maintain the existing level of service.
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
Capital - Utility Enterprise Fund.
.
)
.
)
.
IMPACT ON OPERATING BlJ1[)GET BY YEAR:
StaIDPersonnel
OperationIMaintenance
Capital Outlay
TOTAL:
Offsetting Revenue:
NET OPERATING IMPACT:
JMPACf ON REVENUE:
No impact on revenue.
OS-3600-24.wpd
)
$0
$0
$105,000
. $105,000
$0
. ($105,000)
.
':"\."';'
.
)
)
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REOUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT:
Utility
PROJECT NAME:
East Force Main Rerouting
LOCATION:
Eastern Portion of Winter Springs Resurfacing
SERVICE AREA:
City
PROJECT NUMBER:
#05-3600-28
PROJECT PRIORITY:
Repair/Replacement
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
No
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICA TION:
This project is for the rerouting of the wastewater flows originating from the Western and
Northern areas of the East system. Our goal is to reduce the amount ofre-pumping and reduce
the load on some conveyance lines:
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECfIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
This project will enable us to maintain the existing level of service.
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
Capital - Utility Enterprise Fund.
)
.
.",;1. \
I
)
.
)
)
.
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR:
StafflPersonnel
OperationIMaintenance
Capital Outlay
TOTAL:
Offsetting Revenue:
NET OPERATING IMPACT:
IMPACT ON REVENUE:
No impact on revenue.
0.5-3600-28.wpd
$0
$0
$150,000
. $150,000
$0
($150,000)
.
.
.
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR:
Staff/Personnel $0
OperationIMaintenance $0
Capital Outlay S50,OOO-'00/SI OO,OOO/yr
TOTAL: SSO,ooo-'oolSl00,OOO/yr
Offsetting Revenue:
NET OPERATING IMPACT:
$0
$50,000- 'oo/$loo,ooO/yr
IMPACT ON REVENUE:
No impact on revenue.
20-3600-36.wpd
.
I
.
. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT:
Utility
PROJECT NAME:
West Water Reclamation Facilitv Sune Tank
LOCATION:
West WRF - 1000 West S.R. 434
SERVICE AREA:
City
PROJECT NUMBER:
#01-3600-30
PROJECT PRIORITY:
PI armed Expansion
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
No
DESCRIPTION/JUSTUFICA nON:
This project is for the construction of a surge tank at the West WRF. A surge tank is needed to
attenuate the increased flows that occur with growth. The surge tank equalizes the peak flows so
that hydraulic surges and overloads do not upset the plant.
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECTIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
This project will allow the treatment plant to handle increased peak flows associated with growth.
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
1997 Utility Construction Fund
)
. IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR:
.
Stafi7Personnel $0
OperationIMaintenance $
Capital Outlay $900,000
TOTAL: $9OOtooo
Offsetting Revenue: $0
NET OPERATING IMPACT: $900,000
IMPACT ON REVENUE:
No impact on revenue.
.....:...\
,;
. Ol-3600-30.wpd
-
).
\
.
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REOUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT: Utili~
PROJECT NAME: West WRF Air Line AdditiOll
LOCATION: West WRF
SERVICE AREA: Western Portion of City
PROJECT NUMBER: #01.3600-33
PROJECT PRIORITY: Existing Deficiency
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IM1PROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
No
. DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION:
This project is for the addition of a parallel air line from the blowers to the treatment plant. The
existing single air line can not handle the air volume when all three blowers are running.
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECTIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
This project will enable the wastewater treatment plant to handle the increased flows associated
. ~
with wet weather.
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
Utility Revenue Generation Fund.
.
.
.
.
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR:
Staff/Personnel $0
OperationIMaintenance SO
Capital Outlay $50,000
TOTAL: $50,000
Offsetting Revenue: $0
NET OPERATING IMPACT: ($50,000)
IMP~CT ON REVENUE:
No impact on revenue.
OI-3600-JJ.wpd
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REOUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT: Utility
PROJECT NAME: WWJ(F Plant #1 PaintinH
LOCATION: West Water Reclamation Facility
SERVICE AREA: City
PROJECT NUMBER: #01-3600-37
PROJECT PRIORITY: Repair/Replacement
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT:
No
. DESCRIPTlON/JUSTIFICA noN:
This project is to sandblast and repaint plant #1 at the West WRF. This steel structure exhibits
extensive corrosion and needs to be refinished.
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECTIPLANS AND TEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
None.
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
Renewal and Replacement - Utility Enterprise Fund.
.
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR
Staft7Personnel SO
.-
Operation/Maintenance
Capital Outlay
TOTAL:
Offsetting Revenue:
NET OPERATING IMPACT:
$0
$110,000
$110,000
SO
($110,000)
IMPACT ON REVENUE:
No impact on revenue.
. OI-3600-37wpd
.
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT: Utility
PROJECT NAME: West WRF Belt Filter Press
LOCATION: West WRF - 1000 West S.R. 434
SERVICE AREA: City
PROJECT NUMBER: #02-3600-34
PROJECT PRIORITY: Planned Expansion
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT:
No
. DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION:
This project is for the construction of a belt filter press at the West WRF. The beh filter press is
needed to handle the vonume of solids being generated by this facility. A sludge vacuum bed is
currently utilized which is labor intensive and also requires several days drying time. A higher
solids content is achieved with the belt press which will reduce the volume of solids handled by
employees and by the sludge hauler.
RELA TIONSBIP TO OTHER PROJECTIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
This project will allow the treatment plant to handle increased solids attributable to growth.
PROPOSED METHOD OF FllNANClNG:
.
Utility Revenue Generation Fund.
.
.
.
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR:
Staff/Personnel $0
OperationIMaintenance $0
Capital Outlay $250,000
TOTAL: $150,000
Offsetting Revenue: SO
NET OPERATING IMPACT: ($250,000)
IMPACT ON REVENUE
No impact on revenue.
02.3600-34.wpcI
.,-'
",-","
.
.
PROPOSED RECLAIMED WATER PROJECT EXPENDITURES BY YEAR
Project Project Current Projected Year 1 Year % Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Toul
Number 98/99 99/00 00/01 01102 02/03 OJIM 04/05
Reclaimed Water Dlst. Impr. . oo.3aD-43 $3SO,OOJ $:EO,OOJ
Seneca Blvd.
WS Improvement No Terraces Q3.3EiCX).51 $70,OOJ $70,00J
See #4
04-3&X>-55 $5D,00J $5D,OOJ
Surface Water AugmentaUon
TOTAL $0 $3SO,OOJ $0 $0 $70,CXXl $&X).a::JJ $0 $92O,OOJ
PROPOSED PROJECT REVENUE SOURCE BY YEAR
Revenue Project Current Projected Vear1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total
Source Number 18/99 99/00 00101 01102 02103 03/04 04J06
U.E.F. ro36OO-43 $3SO,a::JJ $3S),OOJ
U.E.F. CJ3..3ElD..61 $70,OOJ $70,OOJ
U.E.F. 04-3ElX)..55 $&X) em $Em,em
TOTAL $0 $35O,em $0 $0 $70,CXXl $5OO,em $0 $92O,em
Approval Dale:
CompIellon Date:
Start Dale:
61~798C1".XLS
.
.)
.
).
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT:
PROJECT NAME:
LOCATION:
Utility
Reclaimed Water Distribution Improvements - Seneca Blvd
Northeast Tuscawilla
SERVICE AREA: Eastern Portion of City
PROJECT NUMBER: #00-3600-43
PROJECT PRIORITY: Planned Expansion
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
No
DESCRlPTION/JUSTIFlCA nON:
This project is for the construction of an extension to the reclaimed distribution system to serve
the Seneca Boulevard area of the City. This project is proposed as part of the East Reclaimed
Water Distribution System Master Plan.
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECTIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
This project will assist us in pursuing our goal of reducing the potable water per capita
consumption.
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING: .:..
Capital - Utility Enterprise Fund.
\
.
.\
.)
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR
StaffJPersonnel
$0
OperationlMaintenance
$0
Capital Outlay
$350,000
TOTAL:
$350,000
Offsetting Revenue:
NET OPERATING IMPACT:
IMPACT ON REVENUE:
There will a reclaimed water revenue increase of approximately $3,600 from this project.
However, there will also be a decrease of approximately $8,000 in potable water revenues. There
will also be a positive impact on future potable water capital demands due to the reduction in
potable water volume requirements.
OO-3600-43.wpd
)
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT:
PROJECT NAME:
Utility
Reclaimed Water Distribution Imorovements - N. O. Terraces
Section #4
LOCATION: North Orlando Terraces, Section 4
SERVICE AREA: West
PROJECT NUMBER: #03-3600-51
PROJECT PRIORITY: Planned Expansion
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
. No
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION:
This project is for the construction of an extension to the reclaimed distribution system to serve
residential customers. This project is proposed as part of the West Reclaimed Water Distribution
System Master- Plan.
RELATIONS~ TO OTHER PROJECTIPLANS AND THE c::;OMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
This project will assist us in pursuing our goal of reducing the potable water per capita
consumption.
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
)
Capital- Utility Enterprise Fund.
.
.
.
)
.
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR
StaIDPersonnel $0
OperationIMaintenance $0
Capital Outlay $70,000
TOTAL:
$70,000
Offsetting Revenue:
NET OPERATING IMPACT:
IMPACT ON REVENUE:
There will a reclaimed water revenue increase of approximately $3,600 from this project.
However, there will also be a decrease of approximately $8,000 in potable water revenues. There
will also be a positive impact on future potable water capital demands due to the reduction in
potable water volume requirements.
O)'36ro-Rwpd
.
./
.
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT: Utility
PROJECT NAME: Reclaimed Surface Water Auementanon
LOCA TION: Central Wmds Park
SERVICE AREA: City
PROJECT NUMBER: #04-3600-55
PROJECT PRIORITY: Planned Expansion
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
No
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFlCA TION:
This project is proposed as part of the West Reclaimed Water Distribution System Master Plan
and augments the reclaimed water supply which, at present, is insufficient to meet the proposed
master plan requirements.
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECTIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
This project will assist us in pursuing our goal of reducing the potable water per capita
consumption.
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
Capital - Utility Enterprise Fund.
.
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR
StatI7Personnel
$0
OperationIMaintenance
$0
Capital Outlay
$500,000
TOTAL:
$500,000
Offsetting Revenue:
NET OPERATING IMPACT:
'."".':") IMPACT ON REVENUE:
,
.
)
)
.
04-3600-SS.wpd
.
.
.
PROPOSED EQUIPMENT EXPENDITURES BY YEAR
Project Project Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 . Total
Name Number 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04105
Vehicle Reolacement 20-3600-64 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $450,000
Sewer Cleaning Vacuum
Unit 01-3600-66 $165,000 $185,000
Backhoe 03-3600-67 $75,000 $75,000
Other Eauioment 20-3600-65 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $200,000
TOTAL $125,000 $290,000 $125,000 $200,000 $125,000 $125,000 $890,000
PROPOSED PROJECT REVENUE SOURCE BY YEAR
Revenue Project Projected Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total
Source Number 99/00 00/01 01/02 02103 03/04 04/05
Utility Enterprise Fund 20-3600-64 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $450,000
Utility Enterprise Fund 01-3600-66 $165,000 $165,000
Utility Enterprise Fund 03-3600-67 $75,000 $75,000
Utility Enterprise Fund 20-3600-65 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $200,000
TOTAL $125,000 $290,000 $125,000 $200,000 $125,000 $125,000 $890,000
Approval Date:
Start Date:
Completion Date:
8116199-9798CIP .XLS
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT: Utility
PROJECT NAME: Vehicle Replacement
LOCA TION: Administrative
SERVICE AREA: City
PROJECT NUMBER: #20-3600-64
PROJECT PRIORITY: Replacement
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
..... J No
.}
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICA nON:
Vehicles need to be replaced to maintain the fleet. Future years will require alternating between
purchasing two and three vehicles per year based on twenty five vehicles with a ten year life
expectancy.
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECTIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
None
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
)
Capital Equipment - Utility Enterprise Fund. ..
)
.
.
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR:
StafflPersonnel
$0
Operation/Maintenance
$0
Capital Outlay
$75,000/yr
TOTAL:
$75,000/yr
Offsetting Revenue:
$0
NET OPERATING IMPACT:
($75,000)/yr
-'.".'. IMPACT ON REVENUE:
. No impact on revenue.
:20-3600-64.wpd
).
)
.
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REOUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT: Utility
PROJECT NAME: Sewer Cleaner Vaccum Unit
LOCA TION: Administration
SERVICE AREA: City
PROJECT NUMBER; #01-3600-66
PROJECT PRIORITY: Planned Addition
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
1:-':..-':) No
.) DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION:
The sewer cleaning vacuum unit is needed for the removal of sand and debris from the gravity
sewer and lift stations. We are limited in our current capability to perform this task due to space
entry regulations and manpower limitations. This vacuum trailer removes materials by sucking
them into a vacuum tank. All operations can be performed from the surface by a single individual.
The vacuum trailer could also be used to clean stonn drains.
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECTIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
None
PROPOSED METHO)[) OF FINANCING:
)
.l
Capital Equipment-Utility Enterprise Fund.
.'.
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR:
StaffiPersonnel $0
OperationIMaintenance
Capital Outlay
TOTAL:
Offsetting Revenue:
NET OPERATING IMPACT:
",..,:,) IMPACT ON REVENlUE:
. No impact on revenue.
.1
Ol-3600-66.wpd
$ 1,000
$164,000
$165,000
$0
($165,000)
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT: Utility
PROJECT NAME: Backhoe
LOCATION: West WRF
SERVICE AREA: City
PROJECT NUMBER: #03-3600-67
PROJECT PRIORITY: RepairlReplacement
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
. ..:j No
.\ DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFlCA nON:
This backhoe is needed to replace the 1988 backhoe currently used at the West WRF for sludge
loading and minor repairs. It costs approximately $5,000 to $7,000 per year to maintain this
equipment. The normal life expectancy ofa backhoe is 10 to 12 years.
RELA TIONSHlP TO OTHER PROJECTIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
None
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
Capital Equipment - Utility Enterprise Fund.
\
)
1
.
.
)
.
)
.
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET BY YEAR
StaIDPersonnel $0
OperationIMaintenance $
Capital Outlay $75,000
TOTAL: $75,000
Offsetting Revenue:
NET OPERATING IMPACT:
$0
($75,000)
IMPACT ON REVENUE:
No impact on revenue.
03-3600-67.wpd
.
..:\
}
.'.
.'
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FORM
DEPARTMENT: Utility
PROJECT NAME: Equipment E.x"enclitures
LOCATION: Administrative
SERVICE AREA: City
PROJECT NUMBER: #20-3600-65
PROJECT PRIORITY: Replacement
IS PROJECT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT?
No
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION:
Equipment needs to be replaced and new equipment added to keep abreast of the future workload
and needs.
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECTIPLANS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
None
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING:
Capital Equipment - Utility Enterprise Fund.
.
. .', '...')
. .
.)
.l
)
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET B:V YEAR:
StatI7Personnel
$0
OperationIMaintenance
$0
Capital Outlay
$50,OOO/yr
TOTAL:
$50,OOO/yr
Offsetting Revenue:
$0
NET OPERATING IMPACT:
($50,000)/yr
IMPACT ON REVENUE
No impact on revenue.
20-3600-65 .wpd
)
.
APPENDIX A
C.I.E. LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS
The principal criterion for capital improvements will be level of service (LOS)
standards, quantitative indicators of the amount of service provided by a facility or type
of facility. The City's need for capital improvements is largely detennined by the LOS
standards adopted in its Comprehensive Plan.
In accordance with Objective C, Policy 1 of the Capital Improvements Element,
Development approvals shall not degrade the following Level of Service Standard
adopted by the City of Winter Springs:
TRAFFIC CIRCULATION
S.R. 434,419 Peak Hour LOS "D"
. Tuscawilla Road (thru 1996) Peak Hour LOS "E"
Municipal Collector Roads Peak Hour LOS "D"
RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE
Community Parks 1. 6 acres per 1,000
Neighborhood Parks
Northwest Sector 5.9 acres per 1,000
South Central 5.3 acres per 1,000
Southeast 6.9 acres per 1,000
SOLID WASTE
Future LOS 3.771bs./capita/day
WATER
Current LOS 143 gcpd
.
.
SEWER
LOS
100 gcpd
STORM WATER (DRAINAGE)
Water quality treatment shall be provided for a volwne equivalent to 1/2 inch of
depth over the entire site or the runoff from the first inch of rainfall on the entire
site, consistent with Chapter 17-25 F.A.C. All stonnwater discharge facilities
shall be designed so as to not degrade the receiving water body below the
minimwn conditions necessary to assure the suitability of water for the designated
use of its classification as established in Chapter 17-302 F.A.C. All treatment and
disposal facilities are required to meet the design and performance standards
established in Chapter 17-25 Sections 17-25.025 and 17-25.035 F.A.C.
.
.
.
)
..i
./
APPENDIX B
INVENTORY OF EXISTING REVENUE SOURCES
Wmter Spring's major fund categories and their use as funding mechanisms for both the operating and
capital improvements budget are described as follows:
General Fund - The General fund is used to account for all transactions of a governmental unit which
are not accounted for in another fund.
Special Revenue Funds - Special Revenue Funds are used to account for loan proceeds and revenues
form specific taxes or other earmarked revenue sources that are legally restricted to expenditures for
specific purposes.
Enterprise Funds - Enterprise Funds are used to account for City services that are operated in a manner
similar to private business enterprises, that is, where the stated intent is that the cOsts (expenses,
. including depreciation) of providing goods or services to the general public on a continuing basis be
financed or recovered primarily through user charges, or where periodic detennination of revenue
earned, expenses incurred, and/or net is deemed appropriate for capital maintenance, public policy,
management control, accountability or other purposes.
In order to effectively plan for needed capital improvements and to systematically arrange for necessary
financing through the budgeting process, a logical preliminary step is to inventory all major sources of
funding to Wmter Springs. The following revenue sources comprise a working inventory, and shall
include but not be limited to the following:
A Property Taxes (ad Valorem) - Property taxes are based on a millage rate [one mill is the
equivalent of$ 1.00 per $ 1,000 of assessed value or .1%) which is applied to the total taxable
value of all real property.
B. Franchise Fees - Franchise fees are levied upon a company in return for the privilege of doing
business within the City's jurisdiction. The rates are established through negotiated contracts
for each franchise. Currently the City has franchise agreements covering gas, electric,
telephone and cable utilities.
C. Licenses. Permits and Fines - All businesses which operate within the City are required to apply
for an occupational license. Building permits are required for all construction. The City
receives from Seminole County a portion of all traffic citations issued within the City.
D. Interest Income - Interest income is revenue earned on funds that have invested by the City.
E.
Other Chan?es for ServiceslUser Fees - Charges for services provided by the City that are paid
.
.
.
F.
H
)
by the users to fully or partially cover the costs incurred to provide the service. These fees
include but are not limited to: special fees placed on developers for processing various plans,
administrative fees for new annexation, and enterprise fund charges for delivering water and.
sewer selVlce.
Utility Taxes - Utility taxes are taxes assessed on the users of water, electric, gas, propane and
telephone. The City currently levies a utility tax rate of 8%.
G.
Miscellaneous Revenue - Miscellaneous revenue includes the minor revenues covering the
rental of City facilities, sale of surplus property and refunds otherwise not distributable.
Intergovernmental Revenues - Intergovernmental revenues are funds collected by the state or
County and shared with other local governmental units.
I.
Special Sources of Revenue - Depending on priorities assigned by the City Commission and the
availability of other revenue sources, it may be necessary to seek additional funding
mechanisms. The following sources of revenue represent local options available to the City to
finance required capital improvements:
1.
Impact Fees - These fees are charged concurrent with new development and are
designed to contribute towards payments for infrastructure needs, but not operational
costs, which directly result from new development. These fees must be equitably
allocated to the specific group(s) which will directly benefit from the capital
improvement, and the assessment levied must fairly reflect the true cost of these
improvements.
2. Special Assessments - Like impact fees, special assessments are levied against
residents, agencies or districts who directly benefit from the new service or facility.
When 51 % of the owners of real estate who would benefit from an improvement,
petition for the improvement, the owners will be assessed 100% of the cost of the
improvement.
3. Borrowing - The extremely high cost of many capital improvements requires local
govenunents to occasion~y resort to borrowing, either through short-term or long-
term financing. short-term financing, perhaps through local banks, is one option
available to raise required revenue for periods of, perhaps, one to five years. The more
customary method, however, is to authorize long-term bond issues, normally for five to
forty years. The following are examples of types of bond issues that the City may use:
a.
General Obligation Bonds - These bonds are backed by the full faith and credit
of the local government and must be approved by voter referendum. They
offer low interest for canying less risk since they are secured by government
taxjng power. Since the g~neral fund is obligated to serve first, the funds raised
by their sale should be used only for projects benefitting the entire City.
b.
Revenue Bonds - Funds raised from revenue bonds may be used for projects
.
.. ')
.'
)
.
benefitting a narrower group than the entire City because the charges collected
from the users of the improvement are applied directly to the debt service on
these bonds. In this respect the projects are self supporting. Revenue bonds
pay higher interest and their issuance may be approved by the City Commission
without voter approval.
c.
Industrial Revenue Bonds - Though the local government issues these bonds,
the debt is actually assumed by the companies or industries who use the
revenues for conStruction of plants or facilities. Because they are tax-exempt
and therefore low interest, industries are attracted to this interaction with the
public sector. Local government can transfer the actual liability to private
interest while garnering employment and economic benefits for the community.
Florida Statutes place limits on the issuance of revenue bonds by local
governments.
d.
State/Federal Sources - The City, like other local governments in Florida,
receives annual disbursements from the state government to supplement its
operating and capital budget revenues. In contrast to revenue sources in the
previous section which are levied, collected, and disbursed all at the localleve~
funds in this section are 1) generated locally, but collected and returned to the
City by the State; 2) adopted as local option tax or license fee, collected and
returned by the State; 3) shared from state general revenues; 4) receipt of
revenues from federal, state, or other local sources in the form of grants. State
sources of revenue for the City include: state revenue sharing in which the
municipal portion is funded through an 11 cent cigarette tax and municipal gas
tax; a state sales tax of 6%, a portion of which is returned to municipalities
based on population; and mobile home licenses, alcoholic beverage tax and
motor fuel tax refunds.
e
.' . h '.)
, ,
eJ
e
,APPENDIX C
POPULA nON PROJECTIONS
The following chart and table are from the City's Comprehensive Plan (Vol 1 of2; Figure LU-F9).
(/)
u
c
~ 20
::J
o
.r=.
I-
ESIlMATED AND PROJECfED POPULATION
1970THROUGH 2010
40
37537
30
10
o
APR 70 APR 75 APR 80 APR 85 APR 90 APR 95 JAN 2000 JAN 05 JAN 10
Data analyzed 1/27/92.
Population Estimates and Projections - 1970 to 2010
Description 1970 1980 1990 1997 2010
----------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Population est./proj. 1,161 10,350 22,683 28,865 37,5)7
Period growth rate N/A 7 9 i.: 4 H 119.16\ 27.25\ 30.04\
Annualized growth rate N/A 24.45\ 8.16\ ).50\ 2_041;
)
Source: \-Jinter Spt-ings Planning Department
.
.....':..;.')
.
)
..
As can be seen from Figure LU-F9 "Estimated and Projected Population (1970 through 2010) the
population projection for the City for January, 2000 is 30,673, slightly above the 29,265 that City staff
has estimated for July, 1999 utilizing the University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business
Research figures combined with the City's building permits for single family residential.
In view of the closeness ofthe projection done in 1992 and the estimate done for
July, 1999, the data and analysis of the Comprehensive Plan is valid and as a result, the improvements
discussed in the various elements of the Comprehensive Plan are still valid.