Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002 06 18 Code Enforcement Board Regular Minutes CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS MINUTES CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD REGULAR MEETING JUNE 18, 2002 I. CALL TO ORDER Chairperson Joanne Krebs called the Regular Meeting to order at 7:0 I p.m. on Tuesday, June 18, 2002, in the Commission Chambers of the Municipal Building (City Hall, 1126 East State Road 434, Winter Springs, Florida 32708). Roll Call: Chairperson Joanne Krebs, present Vice Chairperson Lurene Lyzen, present Board Member Ken Furth, present Board Member James B. Pitts, present Board Member Greg Roero, absent Board Member Greg Thompson, present Board Member Mervin Warner, present The Pledge of Allegiance followed. Chairperson Joanne Krebs asked if there would be any Agenda changes and Ms. C. Jimette Cook, Code Enforcement Manager, Code Enforcement Division, Community Development Department advised the Board that Case CEB 02-00417 is being added to tonight's Agenda, which will be heard in addition to Agenda Item "D" and "E". Ms. Cook distributed new "Finding Of Fact" and "Relief Orders" and spoke briefly of the changes between the old and the new fornls. Chairperson Krebs said, "I was going to entertain a Motion to accept these as our new 'Finding Of Facts' And 'Relief Orders'." MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER FURTH. "SO MOVED." SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER PITTS. DISCUSSION. VOTE: BOARD MEMBER FURTH: AYE BOARD MEMBER PITTS: AYE BOARD MEMBER WARNER: AYE CHAIRPERSON KREBS: AYE VICE CHAIRPERSON LYZEN: AYE BOARD MEMBER THOMPSON: AYE MOTION CARRIED. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS MINUTES CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD REGULAR MEETING - JUNE 18,2002 PAGE 2 OF 12 II. CONSENT CONSENT A. Approval Of The May 21, 2002 Regular Meeting Minutes. Chairperson Krebs requested a Motion to approve the Minutes. "SO MOVED." MOTION BY VICE CHAIRPERSON LYZEN. SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER PITTS. DISCUSSION. VOTE: BOARD MEMBER THOMPSON: AYE CHAIRPERSON KREBS: AYE BOARD MEMBER PITTS: AYE BOARD MEMBER WARNER: AYE BOARD MEMBER FURTH: AYE VICE CHAIRPERSON L YZEN: AYE MOTION CARRIED. .:..:. AGENDA NOTE: THE FOLLOWING CASE WAS ADDED TO THE AGENDA AND DISCUSSED AT THIS MEETING. .:..:. III. REGULAR ADD-ON REGULAR CASE #CEB-02-0000417 Ms. Cook entered into the record "The Statement of Violation and Notice of Hearing" for "Sunstate Trees and Chelsea Pare Homeowner's Association which is the property owner". Ms. Cook stated further, "We have the green card back for Sunstate and although we don't have the return green card from Chelsea Parc that they are represented here this evening." Ms. Cook clarified the violation and location; and spoke of the past citations given to Sunstate Trees which were entered into the record. Deputy City Clerk, Debbie Gillepsie, swore in those persons who may be providing testimony during the presentation of tonight's case. Mr. Michael Mingea, Environmental Inspector/City Forester, Code Enforcement Division, Community Development Department was asked by Ms. Cook whether he had met with representatives of Chelsea Parc Homeowner's Association to discuss the requirements for tree removal; if Chelsea Parc Homeowner's Association had "Pulled a Permit"; and whether he observed tree removal from the common area of Chelsea Parco Mr. Mingea responded affirmatively and explained that when he saw the tree being CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS MINUTES CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD REGULAR MEETING - JUNE 18,2002 PAGE 3 OF 12 removed he stopped and asked the "Sunstate representative - for his Arbor Permit, he was unable to produce and asked him to call the office." Mr. Mingea requested a meeting with the company and prior to leaving the area he measured the tree which was sixteen inches (16") in diameter. ' Ms. Cook said, "We are bringing this to the Board in leu of another citation. We - feel a citation is a warning - but it does not seem to do the job and it would be another $300.00 to do the cost of doing business. We have cited Sunstate [Trees] four (4) times with citations, another time with warnings, and here is this other time. I just don't feel that a citation would - do any good here. I think we need a stiffer penalty. The Homeowner's Association must share in some of this blame. They were aware that a permit needed to be applied for and obtained. Sunstate [Trees] was aware that a permit needed to be applied for and obtained." Ms Cindy Cox, 1421 Creekside Circle, Winter Springs, Florida: spoke of being a new member of the Chelsea Parc Homeowner's Association Board; acknowledged that a permit was needed; and was told by Sunstate Trees that they would get the permit. Brief discussion. Mr. Angelo Sparteri, 264 West State Road 434, Longwood, Florida: as an agent of Sunstate Trees he spoke of his company assisting homeowners with the application for the permit, but that the homeowners are responsible for obtaining the permit and payment of fees. Chairperson Krebs asked, "Y our p~ople are out there, they have no permit but are cutting down a tree. How is that possible?" Mr. Sparteri replied, "That was incorrect. Because of it's not being a home, I guess not knowing that - he could verify - calling up - to see if there was one - probably would have been the way to go." Chairperson Krebs said, "But you are doing business, you are the one who is supposed to know whether or not there is a permit. And if you don't have one in your hand, you don't cut a tree." "Yes ma'am. That's absolutely true," said Mr. Sparteri. Tape l/Side B Further discussion. REVISED FINDING OF FACT: "IN THE CASE OF CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS VERSUS CHELSEA PARC HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION, CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD NUMBER CEB 02-0000417, THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD HAS READ THE COMPLAINT FILED AND THE WRITTEN INFORMATION PREPARED BY THE CODE INSPECTOR, AND HEARD AT THIS HEARING THE SWORN TESTIMONY OF THE CODE INSPECTOR AND OTHER SWORN WITNESSES AND/OR VIOLATORS. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS MINUTES CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD REGULAR MEETING - JUNE 18,2002 PAGE 4 OF 12 BASED UPON THE EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY PRESENTED AT THIS HEARING, I MOVE THAT THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD FIND: (1) THAT CHELSEA PARC HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION WAS PROVIDED NOTICE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 2-59. OF THE CITY CODE THAT A VIOLATION OF CHAPTER 5 OF THE CITY CODE EXISTED UPON THEIR PROPERTY, AND FURTHER PROVIDED A REASONABLE TIME TO CORRECT SAID VIOLATION; (2) THE VIOLATORS FAILED OR REFUSED TO CORRECT SUCH VIOLATION WITHIN THE TIME PROVIDED IN THE NOTICE Of VIOLA TION; (3) THAT THE VIOLATOR WAS PROVIDED NOTICE, IN ACCORDANCE. WITH SECTION 2-59. OF THE CITY CODE, OF THE HEARING BEFORE THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD, AND THAT THE VIOLATORS WERE PRESENT AT THIS HEARING; AND (4) THAT SAID VIOLATION DOES IN FACT CONTINUE TO EXIST PRIOR TO INSPECTION UPON THE VIOLA TOR'S PROPERTY AS OF THIS HEARING. I FURTHER MOVE THAT AN APPROPRIATE RELIEF ORDER BE ISSUED IMMEDIA TEL Y BY THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD." MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER FURTH. SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER WARNER. DISCUSSION. VOTE: VICE CHAIRPERSON L YZEN: AYE CHAIRPERSON KREBS: AYE BOARD MEMBER FURTH: AYE BOARD MEMBER WARNER: AYE BOARD MEMBER THOMPSON: AYE BOARD MEMBER PITTS: AYE MOTION CARRIED. RELIEF ORDER - ORDER OF THE BOARD: "IN THE CASE OF CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS VERSUS CHELSEA P ARC HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION, CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD NUMBER CEB-02-0000417, HAVING BEEN FOUND TO BE IN VIOLATION OF - CHAPTER 5 OF THE CITY CODE, I MOVE THAT THE VIOLATORS BE GIVEN NINETY (90) DAYS AFTER NOTIFICATION TO CORRECT THIS VIOLATION OF THE CITY CODE. IF VIOLATION IS NOT CORRECTED WITHIN THE TIME PROVIDED, A FINE OF TWO HUNDRED AND FIFTY DOLLARS ($250.00) WILL BE IMPOSED, PER VIOLATION UNTIL COMPLIANCE IS ACHIEVED AS VERIFIED BY A CODE ENFORCEMENT INSPECTOR FOR THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS MINUTES CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD REGULAR MEETING - JUNE 18,2002 PAGE 5 OF 12 FURTHERMORE, ANY OR ALL FUTURE RECURRENCES OF THIS VIOLA TION UPON COMPLIANCE HAS BEEN ACHIEVED WILL NECESSITATE FURTHER PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD WITHOUT NECESSARIL Y GIVING THE VIOLATOR AN OPPORTUNITY TO CORRECT SAID VIOLATION. THE FINE, FOR SUCH REOCCURRENCE, SHALL BE A MAXIMUM OF FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($500.00) PER DAY, PER VIOLATION BEGINNING ON THE FIRST DAY THE VIOLATION IS FOUND TO EXIST. AND IF THE VIOLA TION IS NOT CORRECTED WITHIN THE TIME PROVIDED ABOVE, THE CLERK OF THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD SHALL BE DIRECTED TO RECORD A CERTIFIED COpy OF THIS ORDER INTO THE PUBLIC RECORDS FOR SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA. THE VIOLATOR BEING PRESENT AT THIS HEARING AND HAS HEARD THE ORDER OF THIS BOARD, I FURTHER MOVE THAT THE VIOLA TOR BE DEEMED TO HAVE RECEIVED NOTIFICATION OF THIS ORDER IMMEDIATELY." MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER FURTH. SECONDED. DISCUSSION. VOTE: BOARD MEMBER WARNER: AYE BOARD MEMBER FURTH: AYE BOARD MEMBER THOMPSON: AYE BOARD MEMBER PITTS: AYE VICE CHAIRPERSON L YZEN: AYE CHAIRPERSON KREBS: AYE MOTION CARRIED. REVISED FINDING OF FACT: "IN THE CASE OF CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS VERSUS SUNSTATE TREES, CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD NUMBER CEB 02-0000417, THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD HAS READ THE COMPLAINT FILED AND THE WRITTEN INFORMATION PREPARED BY THE CODE INSPECTOR, AND HEARD AT THIS HEARING THE SWORN TESTIMONY OF THE CODE INSPECTOR AND WITNESSES AND VIOLA TORS. BASED UPON THE EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY PRESENTED AT THIS HEARING, I MOVE THAT THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD FIND: (1) THE VIOLATORS SUNSTATE TREES WAS PROVIDED NOTICE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 2-59. OF THE CITY CODE THAT A VIOLATION OF CHAPTER - 5 [NO ARBOR PERMIT] OF THE CITY CODE EXISTED UPON THEIR PROPERTY, AND FURTHER PROVIDED A REASONABLE TIME TO CORRECT SAID VIOLATION; CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS MINUTES CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD REGULAR MEETING - JUNE 18,2002 PAGE 6 OF 12 (2) THE VIOLA TORS FAILED OR REFUSED TO CORRECT SUCH VIOLATION WITHIN THE TIME PROVIDED IN THE - OF VIOLATIONS; (3) THAT THE VIOLATOR WAS PROVIDED NOTICE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 2-59. OF THE CITY CODE, OF THE HEARING BEFORE THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD, AND THAT THE VIOLATOR WAS PRESENT AT THIS HEARING; AND (4) THAT SAID VIOLATION DOES IN FACT CONTINUE TO EXIST UPON THE VIOLATOR'S PROPERTY AS OF THIS HEARING. I FURTHER MOVE THAT AN APPROPRIATE RELIEF ORDER BE ISSUED IMMEDIATELY BY THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD." MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER PITTS. SECONDED BY VICE CHAIRPERSON L YZEN. DISCUSSION. VICE CHAIRPERSON LYZEN REQUESTED THAT FOLLOWING CHAPTER 5, [NO ARBOR PERMIT] BE SUBMITTED. BOARD MEMBER PITTS AGREED. VOTE: VICE CHAIRPERSON LYZEN: AYE BOARD MEMBER THOMPSON: AYE BOARD MEMBER FURTH: AYE BOARD MEMBER PITTS: AYE CHAIRPERSON KREBS: AYE BOARD MEMBER WARNER: AYE MOTION CARRIED. Brief discussion. REVISED RELIEF ORDER - ORDER OF THE BOARD: "IN THE CASE OF CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS VERSUS SUNSTATE TREES, INC., CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD NUMBER CEB-02-0000-417, THE VIOLATOR, SUNSTATE TREE, INC., HAVE BEEN FOUND TO BE IN VIOLATION OF - SECTION 5 [NO ARBOR PERMIT] OF THE CITY CODE. I MOVE THAT VIOLATORS BE FINED $1,000.00 PER VIOLATION, SAID FINE SHOULD BE PAID TO THE CITY WITHIN FIFTEEN (15) DAYS OF THIS ORDER. FURTHER ANY OR ALL FUTURE RECURRENCES AFTER COMPLIANCE HAS BEEN ACHIEVED WILL NECESSITATE FURTHER PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD WITHOUT NECESSARILY GIVING THE VIOLATOR AN OPPORTUNITY TO CORRECT THE VIOLATION. FINALLY, AS THE VIOLATOR IS PRESENT AT THIS HEARING AND HAS HEARD THE ORDER OF THIS BOARD, I FURTHER MOVE THAT THE VIOLATOR BE DEEMED TO HAVE RECEIVED CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS MINUTES CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD REGULAR MEETING - JUNE 18,2002 PAGE 7 OF 12 NOTIFICATION OF THIS ORDER IMMEDIATELY." MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER PITTS. BOARD MEMBER PITTS WAS ASKED TO REST A TE THE COMPANY'S NAME AND A TIME FOR THE FINE TO BE PAID. BOARD MEMBER PITTS SAID, "SUNSTATE TREES, INC." AND ADDED, "SAID FINE SHOULD BE PAID TO THE CITY WITHIN FIFTEEN (15) DAYS OF THIS ORDER." SECONDED. VOTE: CHAIRPERSON KREBS: AYE BOARD MEMBER WARNER: AYE VICE CHAIRPERSON LYZEN: AYE BOARD MEMBER THOMPSON : AYE BOARD MEMBER PITTS: AYE BOARD MEMBER FURTH: AYE MOTION CARRIED. Ms. Cook responded to questions from Mr. Sparteri regarding Ordinance 2002-08 and donating the fine to the Tree Bank Program. Chairperson Krebs recessed the Meeting at 8:20 p.m. Chairperson Krebs reconvened the Meeting at 8:24 p.m. .:. .:. AGENDA NOTE: THE FOLLOWING AGENDA ITEMS WERE HEARD IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER. .:. .:. D. CASE #CEB-99-818 Orange Avenue Chanh Q. Nguyen Reduction/Satisfaction Of Lien Ms. Cook introduced this case, and provided for the record an application for "Satisfaction Or Release Of Code Enforcement Lien"; read portions of the application to the Board Members; and spoke of the history of this case. Discussion. Mr. George B. Wallace, Esquire, P.A., 700 West First Street, Sanford, Florida: addressed the Board and stated, " - advice from an individual - up until October when he brought it to my office. He has worked diligently with me and with City Staff to fix it - once somebody wasn't giving him poor advice. Mr. Nguyen doesn't speak really clear English but he is certainly able to answer your question." Tape 2/Side A CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS MINUTES CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD REGULAR MEETING - JUNE 18, 2002 PAGE 8 OF 12 Also Mr. Wallace asked that "Ms. Cook will indicate that Mr. Nguyen himself has always tried to be cooperative - pleasant - not belligerent, and not antagonistic with the City. " Ms. Cook acknowledged that Mr. Nguyen has been "Very cooperative" and that she encouraged him to hire an attorney. Ms. Cook also said, "I do believe that he was lead astray. On the other hand, I believe he let himself be lead astray and I don't believe a total satisfaction of this lien is called for here." The Board asked if foreclosure proceedings had begun and Ms. Cook responded, "No formal action has been filed at this time." Mr. Wallace said, "We ask for a forgiveness because since I have been retained Mr. Nguyen has done pretty much everything he could as quick as a pace as he could to try to get this matter straightened out and - if the Board feels an absolute forgiveness is not appropriate because of the length of time and other factors - then we would ask the Board amend our affidavit to ask for a reasonable fine amount that Mr. Nguyen might have some capability of satisfying." Mr. Chanh Q. Nguyen, 4409 Steed Terrace, Winter Park, Florida,' stated "I do aware that I had the fine and violation"; was told by the person that created the problem that the mulch had been removed; and explained his confusion about actions taken by the City of Winter Springs and Seminole County. Discussion. The present condition of the property and possible costs to the City were discussed. In response Ms. Cook said, "The property owner is petitioning you for a reduction. My opinion would be the property owner should supply you with that information. I am not going to try his case for him." Discussion. CHAIRPERSON KREBS SAID, "I MAKE A RECOMMENDATION THAT THIS - IN THE CASE OF CEB-99-818 - A REDUCTION TO THE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF TWENTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($20,000.00) FOR MR. NGUYEN AND HAVE THE CITY - ARRANGE FOR A PAYMENT PLAN." MS. COOK SAID, "THE REDUCTION TO TWENTY THOUSAND (20,000.00) NOT UP TO TWENTY THOUSAND?" CHAIRPERSON KREBS THEN REPLIED, "A REDUCTION TO TWENTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($20,000.00) - FROM ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY-SEVEN THOUSAND (187,000.00) AND CHANGE." SECONDED BY VICE CHAIRPERSON L YZEN. DISCUSSION CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS MINUTES CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD REGULAR MEETING - JUNE 18,2002 PAGE 9 OF 12 VOTE: BOARD MEMBER THOMPSON: AYE CHAIRPERSON KREBS: AYE BOARD MEMBER PITTS: AYE BOARD MEMBER WARNER: AYE BOARD MEMBER FURTH: AYE VICE CHAIRPERSON L YZEN: AYE MOTION CARRIED. Chairperson Krebs recessed the Meeting at 9:16 p.m. The Meeting reconvened at 9:23 p.m. Tape 2/Side B E. CASE #CEB-02-330 701 State Road 434 AVA Anthony Corporation Reduction/Satisfaction Of Lien Ms. Cook addressed the Board regarding this case and read into the record a Memorandum "Constituting a supplement to the Phelopateer's application for Release or Satisfaction of Code Enforcement Lien". Mr. Aaron Goravitz, Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor, & Reed, PA., 215 North Ecola Drive, Orlando, Florida: spoke of his client's [Kamil Gowni, Phelopateer, LLC] participation, litigation, and difficulties in his attempt to develop the property; and asked for "A reasonable reduction under the circumstances." Mr. Goravitz was asked if a gas station is still in the plans for the property. Mr. Goravitz replied, "Right now we have the opportunity to file a Vested Rights case against the City and trying to get a gas station built. That is our absolute last resort if we can work out these code enforcement issues and do a different plan of sort. I don't expect that we would build a gas station but there is no firm plan in place with respect to what we are going to do." Discussion ensued regarding the City's request for an opaque fence; past communications with AVA Anthony; possible Vested Rights litigation; the "Relief Order" stipulations; and the date of compliance. Mr. Goravitz said, "We could stipulate as part of a settlement here that we wouldn't pursue the Vested Rights claim." Additionally Mr. Goravitz stated, "I just spoke to Mr. Gowni and if there was a recommendation for a nominal fine which goes to the City Council as part as any final documentation with the City Council we would agree not to CITY OF WINTER SPRlNGS MINUTES CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD REGULAR MEETING - JUNE 18,2002 PAGE 10 OF 12 file the Vested Rights suit and just kind of live with the Code and get on and start developing." Brief discussion. Ms. Cook suggested, "The City might ask that in making a recommendation, you include a provision that the property, at least for mowing, be maintained on a regular basis now that the Attorney has eluded that money is coming in and they might be able to do that if it is overgrown again." Discussion City Manager Ronald W McLemore arrived at J 0:09 p.m. Chairperson Krebs briefed the City Manager on the offer regarding possible litigation regarding Vested Rights and whether the offer would benefit the City. Tape 3/ Side A Manager McLemore spoke of the City's likelihood of winning the litigation and stated. "It's probably fifty/fifty (50/50), so there is some exposure to the City from a financial prospective if that litigation is pursued. So there is a value for that going away. The flip side of that is that the City has had a lot of cost and aggravation and still - piece of property. The current owner did in fact come forward to try to do something with that property, clean it up because of a decision of the City Commission, I was unable to do that. So, the best I can advise you is, yes there's something of value and I would think something of substantial value to that litigation, potentially going away." Manager McLemore departed the Meeting at approximately J 0: J 7 p.m. Discussion ensued regarding possible reduction figures; costs to the City involving this case; possible stipulations to the reduction; and how long before the property will be "Cleaned up". Mr. Goravitz said, "We'll mow it within seven (7) days and ..." MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER FURTH. "I MAKE A MOTION THAT UNDER CEB-02-300, 701 STATE ROAD 434, AVA ANTHONY CORPORATION, THEIR REQUEST FOR REDUCTION/SATISFACTION OF LIEN. I RECOMMEND THAT - I MAKE A MOTION THAT WE SET A FINE OF TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ($10,000.00) WITH A PAYMENT PLAN AS ARRANGED BY THE CITY WITH A VA ANTHONY, OR THE NEW COMPANY PHELOPATEER MAINTAIN THE PROPERTY PER ORDINANCE WHILE WAITING FOR CONSTRUCTION TO START. WAIVE VESTED RIGHTS SUIT, DEVELOP THE PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT WINTER SPRINGS CODES AND ORDINANCES." SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER WARNER. DISCUSSION. BOARD MEMBER FURTH SAID, "I CHANGE MY MOTION TO MAINTENANCE ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY." CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS MINUTES CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD REGULAR MEETING - JUNE 18,2002 PAGE II OF 12 VOTE: VICE CHAIRPERSON L YZEN : AYE CHAIRPERSON KREBS: AYE BOARD MEMBER FURTH: AYE BOARD MEMBER WARNER: AYE BOARD MEMBER THOMPSON: AYE BOARD MEMBER PITTS: AYE MOTION CARRIED. .:..:. AGENDA NOTE: THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE NOT DISCUSSED AT THIS MEETING. .:..:. REGULAR A. CASE #CEB-02-316 633 Dolphin Road Anthony M. & Nancy E. Pandolfi Chapter 5 (No Arbor Permit) B. CASE #CEB-02-324 216 Charles Street Maria & George Ward Chapter 5 (No Arbor Permit) C. CASE #CEB-02-330 118 Moss Road Cesar M. & Romonita Wilson Section 20-433. (Disabled And Unlicensed Motor Vehicle) IV. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS The Board requested that "Swearing In Of Witnesses" be added to future Agendas and the placement of brackets in the "Finding of Fact" and "Relief Orders". V. REPORTS None. VI. ADJOURNMENT Chairperson Krebs adjourned the Meeting at 10:34 p.m. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: ~~ DEBBIE GILLESPIE DEPUTY CITY CLERK \City Clerk\BOARDS\CODEENFO\ALLL\MINUTES\2002\061802 REGULAR.doc CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS MINUTES CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD REGULAR MEETING - JUNE 18, 2002 PAGE 12 OF 12 NOTE: These Minutes were approved at the August 20, 2002 Code Enforcement Board Meeting.