The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1996 07 16 Code Enforcement Board Regular Minutes MINUTES CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD JULY 16, 1996 - REGULAR MEETING 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Sclmeider at 7:00 p.m. in the Commission Chambers, Municipal Building. 2. Pled2e of AlIe2iance 3. Roll Call Also Present Bob Gray, absent Chuck Holzman, present Ken Haines, present Kitty Reilly, absent Anne Schneider, present Bob Amato, absent (7:03) Lurene Lyzen, present Acting Chief Bob Pieper, Code Enforcement Officer AI White, Code Inspector Bob Amato arrived. 4. Approval of the Minutes of June 18. 1996. Chairperson Schneider asked for comments regarding the June 18, 1996 meeting minutes. Lyzen stated that the violation regarding Item #7 (Lucinda and Edward King, Jr.) was corrected at the time of the meeting, but the };lnding of Fact in the minutes read that they are in violation. The Relief Order was correct. Pieper said that if Haines used the standardized language for a violation corrected then it should reflect on the recording. The Deputy City Clerk will double check the tape. Motion: Table the approval of the June 18, 1996 meeting minutes until the August meeting so the minutes can be verified with the tape. Motion by Lyzen. Second by Haines. Vote: Holzman, aye; Schneider, aye; Haines, aye; Lyzen, aye; Amato, aye. Motion carried. 5. Discussion of Closed and Pendin2 Cases. Chairperson Schneider asked for comments and questions regarding the Discllssion ~f Closed and Pending Cases. Lyzen asked if Case #96011667,625 Marni Drive, was being watched. White said that at the time the officer was there, the problem was corrected. Pieper explained that the "NFR" means that if another violation occurs, then the officer is able to issue a citation at that time because a written warning has been issued. "No Eollow-up Required" indicates that the violator has been given fair warning. White said that since Lyzen lived next door that she should report the violation. Lyzen said MINUTES CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD JULY 16, 1996 - REGULAR MEETING PAGE 2 OF 3 there hasn't been a problem since her husband yelled at them (dogs). Haines asked if the Codes on Parking included out of the city police vehicles. Pieper stated that if an Orange County Deputy brings the car home and parks it on the street then it is a violation of the City Code; if it is parked on the grass it might be a violation of a deed restriction covenant handled by the HOA. Haines said that the ofIicer parks across the street on the grass where there is no homes. (entering Unit 8 on Trotwood) He said he wasn't aware of any formal complaints to the city, but a couple of people have mentioned it to him. White said that didn't look like a violation. Pieper mentioned that modifications were made to the Standardized Language for Motions. 6. Case# 96008230. Daniel V. Mazza. 230 Bennet. Morhm2ee: Bank United of Texas FSB Section 13-Uc) Untended Grass Pieper stated that items 6 and 7 can be heard at the same time because both violations are of Section 13-2: one for paragraph (c) and the other for paragraph (b), and both violations are dealing with the same individual at the same location. Written warnings were issued separately for the violations. Chairperson Schneider agreed, but stated that each case would be voted on separately. Pieper presented the case. Photos were circulated by White for the members to review. There has not been any action taken on this home as seen by comparing the photos dated June 5 and July 16, 1996. White was sworn in for testimony. White gave his testimony. Motion: Daniel V. Mazza of230 Bennet and Bank United of Texas FSB are in violation of Section -~- 13-2 (c) of the Code of the City of Winter Springs. Motion by Lyzen. Second by Haines. Vote: Schneider, aye; Amato, aye; Lyzen, aye; Holzman, aye; Haines, aye. Motion carried. Relief Order: In the case ofCEB# 96008230 of the City of Winter Springs, Daniel V. Mazza and Bank United of Texas FSB having been found to be in violation of Section 13-2( c) of the Code of this City, shall be given 10 days, after notification, to come into compliance with regard to this violation. If compliance is not achieved by that date, a fine of $50.00 will be imposed per day until compliance is achieved, as verified by an officer of the city. Furthermore, any and all future recurrence(s) of this violation after compliance has been achieved will immediately cause the stated fine to be imposed until compliance is again achieved, as verified by an officer of the City. Motion by Lyzen. Second by Schneider. Discussion. Vote: Holzman, aye; Lyzen, aye; Haines, aye; Schneider, aye; Amato, aye. Motion carried. c ov..tc\iO{\ s+cJeJ 'u.-. ~ ~)2Dlqlp ~~ MINUTES CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD JULY 16, 1996 - REGULAR MEETiNG PAGE 3 OF 3 7. Case #96008231. Daniel V. Mazza. 230 Bennet. MortS!a2:ee: Bank United of Texas FSB Section 13-2(b) Junk in Yard Chairperson Schneider stated that the presentation for Case #96008231 was already heard, and asked if anyone was prepared to make a finding of fact. Motion: Daniel V. Mazza of230 Bennet and Bank United of Texas FSB was in fact in violation of ---- Section 13-2(b) of the Code of the City of Winter Springs; and that such violation was not corrected within the time specified for correction by the Code Inspector, as per City Ordinance Section2-59; and that an appropriate relief be issued at this meeting to address any potential future violations of this same Ordinance. Motion by Amato. Second by Lyzen. Discussion. The motion and second were rescinded. Motion: Daniel V. Mazza of 230 Bennet and Bank United of Texas FSB are in violation of Section 13-2 (b) of the Code of the City of Winter Springs. Motion by Amato. Second by Lyzen. Vote: AlIlato, aye; Schneider, aye; Haines, aye; HolZlIlan, aye; Lyzen, aye. Motion carried. Relief Order: In the case ofCEB# 96008231 of the City of Winter Springs, Daniel V. Mazza and Bank United of Texas FSB having been found to be in violation of Section 13-2(b) of the Code of this City, shall be given 10 days, upon notification, to come into compliance with regard to this violation. If compliance is not achieved by that date, a fine of $50.00 will be imposed per day until compliance is achieved, as verified by an otlicer of the city. Furthermore, any and all future recurrence(s) of this violation after compliance has been achieved will immediately cause the stated fine to be imposed until compliance is again achieved, as verified by an otlicer of the City. Motion by Haines. Second by Schneider. Vote: HolZlIlan, aye; Lyzen, aye; AlIlato, aye; Schneider, aye; Haines, aye. Motion carried. 8. Adiournment Chairperson Schneider adjourned the meeting at 7:40 p.m. /mj