HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996 01 16 Code Enforcement Board Regular Minutes
MINUTES
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD
JANUARY 16, 1996 MEETING
1. Call to Order
Chairperson Schneider called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Commission Chambers, City
Hall.
2. Pledge of Allegiance
City Officials, present
3. Roll Call
Anne Schneider, Chairperson, present
Bob Gray, present
Ken Haines, present
Charles Holzman, present
Kitty Reilly, present
Lurene Lyzen, present
Lloyd Anderson, absent
Al White, Code Enforcement Inspector
Captain Bob Pieper, Code Enforcement Officer
4. Approval of the Minutes of November 21, 1995
Chairperson asked for comments regarding the minutes.
Motion: The minutes be accepted as written.
Motion by Lyzen. Second by Haines.
Vote: Lyzen, aye; Schneider, aye; Haines, aye; Gray, aye; Holzman, aye; Reilly, aye.
Motion Passed.
Chairperson Schneider told the members that Anderson was not present because his wife was very
ill, and asked everyone to keep them in their thoughts.
5. Discussion of Closed and Pending Cases
Lyzen asked if Case #95017903 on page 3, and the second and third cases on page 4 were still
pending. White said yes. He is having difficulty locating the owners. She also asked about the
"utility trailer" on South Cortez (second to the last page). White said the trailer is still parked in front
of the house, and he hasn't been able to reach the gentleman for the last couple of weeks.
Reilly asked about the "pending" boat and trailer (same page as utility trailer) on Silver Creek. White
stated that the case has cleared. She also asked about the case (last page) on South Edgemon, "Junk
in Yard". White said the case cleared over the weekend.
6. Formats for "Finding of Facts" and "Order of the Board"
White distributed a folder to each board member and the recording secretary containing a collection
of standardized language for motions of the board.
MINUTES
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD
JANUARY 16, 1996 MEETING
PAGE 2
Finding of Facts:
I)Violation existing the time of the meeting
2)Violation which was not corrected in the time given,
but corrected by the time of the meeting
3) No violation
4) Motion to continue
Relief Orders:
1) Standard relief order after finding of fact
2) Relief order after a repeat violation after a previous order
Captain Pieper said that this should cover all of the possibilities, but modifications may be needed as
time goes by. The members were pleased. Chairperson Schneider thanked Captain Pieper for his
efforts.
Witnesses were sworn in for testimony.
7. Case #95013877. 670 Venture Court. Michael T. Stanfill. Mortgagee: Inland Mortgage
Corp.. Section 13-2(c) Untended Grass:
(This case was heard after case#950 170 11)
Captain Pieper presented the case. White gave his testimony. Discussion.
Findin2: of Fact: Michael T. Stanfill and Inland Mortgage Corp. are in violation of Section 13-2(c)
of the Code of the City of Winter Springs.
Motion by Chairperson Schneider. Second by Haines.
Vote: Gray, aye; Holzman, aye; Reilly, aye; Haines, aye; Scltneider, aye; Lyzen, aye.
Motion passed.
Relief Order: In the case ofCEB#95013877 of the City of Winter Springs, Michael T. Stanfill and
Inland Mortgage Corp. having been found to be in violation of Section 13-2(c) of the Code of this
city, shall be given ~ days, upon due notification by this board, to come into compliance with
regard to this violation. If compliance is not achieved by that date, a fine of $250.00 will be imposed
per day until compliance is achieved, as verified by an officer of the city. Furthermore, any and all
future recurrence(s) of this violation after compliance has been achieved will immediately cause the
stated fine to be imposed until compliance is again achieved, as verified by an officer of the city.
Motion by Chairperson Schneider. Second by Reilly.
Vote: Reilly, aye; Haines, aye; Gray, aye,. Scltneider, aye; Lyzen, aye; Holzman, aye.
Motion passed.
8. Case #9501701 L 1014 Fox Den Court. William A. Morrisey & Jennifer Neeff. Mortgagee:
Lincoln Service Corp.. Section 4-1 (20.25) Barking Dog:
(This case was heard before case #95013877)
Captain Pieper presented the case. He stated that the situation is expected to continue; therefore, the
MINUTES
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD
JANUARY 16, 1996 MEETING
PAGE 3
case is brought back so that further relief may be enacted. White gave his testimony. Discussion.
Testimony was given by Ed Morrisey, 1014 Fox Den Court; Sally Morrisey, 1014 Fox Den Court;
and William Morrisey, 1014 Fox Den Court. Discussion.
Relief Order: In the case ofCEB#95017011 of the City of Winter Springs, William A. Morrisey &
Jennifer Neeff, and Lincoln Service Corp. having been previously found to be in violation of Section
4-1 (20.25) of the Code of this city at the Code Enforcement Board meeting of September 20, 1994,
and having been shown by the evidence and testimony presented at this meeting to have repeated this
violation in the face of a standing Relief Order of this Board, shall be given due notification that this
is a repeat violation, and a fine of$100.00 as provided by F.S.S. 162.09 (2)(a), be imposed for each
day this violation continues past this date, until compliance is achieved, as verified by an officer of
the city. Furthermore, any and all repeat violations of this order in the future will cause this same fine
to be immediately imposed for each violation until compliance is achieved, as verified by an officer
of the city.
Motion by Lyzen. Second by Holzman.
Vote: Lyzen, aye; Reilly, aye; Holzman, aye; Haines, nay; Schneider, aye; Gray, nay.
Motion passed.
9. Case #95015829. 312 North Panama Circle. Robert P. & Meggan L. Winter. Mortgagee:
Transamerica RE Tax Service-Auto. Section 13-2(c) Untended Grass:
Captain Pieper said that Item #9 is removed from the agenda due to a recent turnover in ownership
of the property. The problem has been corrected.
10. Case #95014979. 1567 Carrington Avenue. Philip 1. & Judith A. Frechette. Section 13-2(c).
Untended Grass:
Captain Pieper presented the case. He stated that the violation was not corrected within the time limit
given, and seems evident that the owner is not taking steps to correct the problem. White gave his
testimony. Discussion.
Findin~ of Fact: Philip 1. and Judith A. Frechette are in violation of Section 13-2(c) of the Code
of the City of Winter Springs.
Motion by Holzman. Second by Haines.
Vote: Haines, aye; Schneider, aye; Lyzen, aye; Reilly, aye; Holzman, aye; Gray, aye.
Motion passed.
Relief Order: In the case ofCEB#95014979 of the City of Winter Springs, Philip 1. and Judith A.
Frechette having been found in violation of Section 13-2(c) of the Code of this city, shall be given
l days, upon due notification by this board, to come into compliance with regard to this violation.
If compliance is not achieved by that date, a fine of$100.00 will be imposed per day until compliance
is achieved, as verified by an officer of the city. Furthermore, any and all future recurrence(s) of this
MINUTES
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD
JANUARY 16, 1996 MEETING
PAGE 4
violation after compliance has been achieved will immediately cause the stated fine to be imposed
until compliance is again achieved, as verified by an officer of the city.
Motion by Lyzen. Second by Reilly.
Vote: Lyzen, aye; Reilly, aye; Holzman, aye; Haines, aye; Gray, aye; Schneider, aye.
Motion passed.
The board members agreed to have elections at the March meeting for a chairperson and vice-
chairperson.
11. Adjournment
Chairperson Schneider adjourned the meeting at 8:30 p.m.
. -,\\ a1~\{\.'~~_'(.~_~:
Martha Jenkiils-,~eputy City Clerk
APPROVED:
Anne Schneider, Chairperson
ORDER OF THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD - CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
INRE:
Case #95014979
1567 Carrington Avenue, Winter Springs, FL
Cert# P226024132
Philip 1. & Judith A. Frechette
P.O. Box 917729
Longwood, FL 32791-7729
The Code Enforcement Board of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, sat in hearing on January 16, 1996,
in the matter of Philip 1. & Judith A. Frechette to determine whether they are in violation of Section 13-2( c)
of the codes of the City of Winter Springs, Florida. Upon hearing all evidence on the matter, the Board
arrived at the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT AND LAW
1. Philip 1. & Judith A. Frechette are in violation of Section 13-2(c)
of the Code of the City of Winter Springs.
ORDER OF THE BOARD
1. Philip 1. & Judith A. Frechette having been found in violation of
Section 13-2(c) of the Code of this city, shall be given ~ days,
upon due notification by this board, to come into compliance
with regard to this violation. If compliance is not achieved by
that date, a fine of $100.00 will be imposed per day until
compliance is achieved, as verified by an officer of the city.
Furthermore, any and all future recurrence(s) of this violation
after compliance has been achieved will immediately cause the
stated fine to be imposed until compliance is again achieved, as
verified by an officer of the city.
Now then, the Code Enforcement Board of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, instructs all enforcement
procedures to be instituted to accomplish this Order.
This /8 day of January, 1996.
{.~<L- VdL<M!^':fZz~
:::;...-' ./
Anne Schneider, Chairperson
Code Enforcement Board
City of Winter Springs
ORDER OF THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD - CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
IN RE:
Case #95017011
1014 Fox Den Court, Winter Springs, FL
Cert# P22602413 1
William A. Morrisey and Jennifer Neeff
1014 Fox Den Court
Winter Springs, FL 32708
Cert# P22602413 0
Lincoln Service Corp.
1100 Walnut Street
Owensboro, KY 43202-0989
The Code Enforcement Board of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, sat in hearing on January 16, 1996,
in the matter of William A. Morrisey & Jennifer Neeff, and Lincoln Service Corp. to determine whether they
are in repeat violation of Section 13-2(c) of the code of the City of Winter Springs, Florida. Upon hearing
all evidence on the matter, the Board arrived at the following:
ORDER OF THE BOARD
1. William A. Morrisey & Jennifer Neeff, and Lincoln Service
Corp. having been previously found to be in violation of Section
4-1 (20.25) of the Code of this city at the Code Enforcement
Board meeting of September 20, 1994, and having been shown
by the evidence and testimony presented at this meeting to have
repeated this violation in the face of a standing Relief Order of
this Board, shall be given due notification that this is a repeat
violation, and a fine of$100.00 as provided by F.S.S. 162.09
(2)(a), be imposed for each day this violation continues past this
date, until compliance is achieved, as verified by an officer of
the city. Furthermore, any and all repeat violations of this order
in the future will cause this same fine to be immediately imposed
for each violation until compliance is achieved, as verified by an
officer of the city.
Now then, the Code Enforcement Board of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, instructs all enforcement
procedures to be instituted to accomplish this Order.
This I:g day of January, 1996.
2/.
00 CO 0 ,. // 0/ '7
/ ./ 00
L- o/:!W<Jlk"!' /:/t:A!~<:-, ,It-t._
Anne Schneider, Chairperson
Code Enforcement Board
City of Winter Springs
ORDER OF THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD - CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
IN RE:
Case #95013877
670 Venture Court, Winter Springs, FL
Cert # P226024134
Michael T. Stanfill
11804 Beaverten Drive
Bridgeton, MO 63044
Cert# P22602413 3
Inland Mortgage Corporation
9265 Counselor's Row
P.O. Box 40616
Indianapolis, IN 46240
The Code Enforcement Board of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, sat in hearing on January 16, 1996,
in the matter of Michael T. Stanfill and Inland Mortgage Corp. to determine whether they are in violation
of Section 13-2( c) of the codes of the City of Winter Springs, Florida. Upon hearing all evidence on the
matter, the Board arrived at the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT AND LAW
1. Michael T. Stanfill and Inland Mortgage Corp. are in violation
of Section 13-2(c) of the Code of the City of Winter Springs.
ORDER OF THE BOARD
1. Michael T. Stanfill and Inland Mortgage Corp. having been
found to be in violation of Section 13-2( c) of the Code of this
city, shall be given ~ days, upon due notification by this
board, to come into compliance with regard to this violation.
If compliance is not achieved by that date, a fine of$250.00 will
be imposed per day until compliance is achieved, as verified by
an officer of the city. Furthermore, any and all future
recurrence(s) of this violation after compliance has been
achieved will immediately cause the stated fine to be imposed
until compliance is again achieved, as verified by an officer of
the city.
Now then, the Code Enforcement Board of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, instructs all enforcement
procedures to be instituted to accomplish this Order.
This / g day of January, 1996.
a~ !<L~_j;L
Anne Schneider, Chairperson
Code Enforcement Board
City of Winter Springs