HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997 10 13 Regular Item D
'~
COMMISSION AGENDA
ITEM
D
REGULAR X
CONSENT
INFORMATIONAL
_QcJQber 13, 1997
Meeting
MGR l ~ LDEET /~)-
Authorization
REQUEST: Public Works Department Requesting Approval of the Second Reading of
Ordinance #684 Revising the Transportation Impact Fee.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this Board item is to authorize the second reading of Ordinance
#684 which replaces the Transportation Impact Fee Cost Table identified as
Appendix "B" of Division 2, Article VII, Chapter 9 of the City Code of
Ordinances.
CONSIDERATIONS:
The adoption of this ordinance is needed to revise the Transportation Impact Fee
Cost Table (Appendix "B") to reflect the new lane mile cost ofthe Traffic Circulation
Element Update Capital Improvements program. The new fee schedule represents an
approximate reduction of 40% to the transportation impact fee.
The City Commission has retained the services of Conklin, Porter & Holmes
Engineers, Inc. to update the Traffic Circulation Element of the Comprehensive Plan.
Based on consultant recommendations, workshops and public input, a significant amount
of the roadway projects initially included in the Comp Plan have been deleted particularly
as it relates to new roads. This has lowered the estimated construction cost per lane mile
from $936,827.00 to $561,879.00. As an example, the transportation impact fee for a
single family home will be reduced from $1,478.27 to $890.96.
The new impact fee is estimated to provide sufficient revenues to cover the needs
of the capital improvements program. A Iransp-ortationJrnpacLEe_e_Update is attached
which includes the capital improvements projects list, growth projections, and revenue
. ., .
October 13, 1997
Regular Agenda Item D
Page 2_
projections. The Traffic Circulation Update to the Comprehensive Plan will be presented
to the City Commission for approval this fall after review by the Local Planning Agency.
FUNDING:
No funds are needed at this time. It is projected that the revised Transportation
Impact Fee will provide sufficient revenues to fund the needs of the capital improvements
program.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Commission approve the second reading of
Ordinance #684 lowering the lane mile costs as detailed in the revised Appendix "B" of
Division 2, Article VII, Chapter of the City Code of Ordinances.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
The new transportation impact fees will be effective upon second reading of the
ordinance and execution by the Mayor.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Ordinance #684
2. Transportation Impact Fee Update
COMMISSION ACTION:
. ......1....:.;,.
Attachment No. 1
ORDINANCE NO. ~4...
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA,
AMENDING APPENDIX "B" - TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE WITH
$561,879/LANE MILE, OF DIVISION 2 - TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES,
ARTICLE VII -IMPACT FEES, CHAPTER 9 - LAND DEVELOPMENT;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, is
desirous of amending its Transportation Impact Fee to assure it reflects the general
conditions of its ordinances, resolutions, policies and procedures;
\VHEREAS, it is necessary to update these Codes from time to time.
NO\V THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA:
SECTION I - That Appendix "B" Winter Springs City Transportation Impact Fee
with $936,827/lane mile is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced the attached Appendix
"B" Transportation Impact Fee with $561,879/1ane mile.
SEC:TION IT - CONFLICTS. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict
herewith being the same are hereby repealed.
SEC:TION iIT - SEVERABILITY. If any section or portion of a section or
subsection ofthis ordinance proves to be invalid, unlawful or unconstitutional it shall not be
held to invalidate or impair the validity, force or effect of any other section or portion of
section or subsection or part of this Ordinance.
I
SECTION IV - EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon its passage and adoption.
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
PAUL P. PARTYKA, MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
First Reading
Posted
Second Reading and Public Hearing
APPENDIX B
NEW AVE % OF vEtUCLE NEW DAlLY NEW Cln'
TOTAl. ONE OF PER CE."lT DAILY DAlL Y TRIPS TRJP MI1.ES ON THE \fEll. MILES LOSD ~lR.EET CURRENT UPDATED
ITEM LAND USE TYPE GROUP GBA! DAlL Y DAlLY TWO TRIP OF DISCRlB ^ ITRJ BlIT,<nLE LENGTH CITY STREET ON THE CITY PEIl LANE SYSTEM COST PEIl TOTAL TOTAL COST
CODE MID RANGE UNlTS GLA TRJP RATE TRJPS ENDS NEW TRIPS FACTOR TO SITE (MILES) SYSTEM SYSTEM CAPACITY u.NE MILES LANE MILE COST/SITE . PER u:'Jrr
INDUSTRIAL
110 GcncnJ Liglu Industri.J 100.000 1.000 SF GBA 6.45 645.0 0.5 100"/. 1.52 490.20 5.00 n.n% IJ 10.55 ro50 0.1628 1"561.879 591.475 191..75
IJO Industrial Pule 300.000 1.000 SF GIlA 7.50 2250.0 0.5 .~~ 1.09 1226.25 5.00 SJ.4"n~ )271.31 1050 OAon 56/.179 ZlI.'26 762. 7 ~
ISO W.uchou:sins 100.000 1.000 SF GRA 7.11 711.0 0.5 100"/. 1.7' 611.57 . 5.00 SJAJ-/. 1653.75 1050 . 0.205" 561.879 liS..:!'! 1.1:'4 ::?:9
151 Mioi-w:uchousc 500 1 SU GBA 0.26 DO.O 0.5 to<r.'/. 1.09 70.85 5.00 5)..7% 119.42 1050 0.0235 561.879 .)).221 264+-1
RESlD.I:NTL\L
210 Sins1c F...mJy Ddachcd )00 CU NlA 9.46 2838 0 O.S J~~ 1.03 1461.S7 '.90 53.''''/, 3129.36 8050 0.4757 561.879 267.214 1'>0.95
no Low-rise Apanmcoll 300 CU NlA 6,:;'" 19020 0.5 lor~"'. 0.93 88'.43 4.90 S).4~~ 2J/7.2J 8050 0.2.879 561.879 161.740 );9. I)
2JO low.nsc: RC:Qdcnt.i:.LJ Condo 200 CU N/A 5.87 117..0 0.5 (~1. 0.94 551.78 '.90 53.47% 1'.5.68 8050 0.1796 561.879 100.9<l6 5o~.5J
240 MoLac Home p;"Jc 200 ClJ NtA '.65 970.0 0.5 100% 1..14 552.90 '.90 5J.4~~ IHI.61 8050' 0.1100 561.8'19 101.111 JOS.56
251 CongfCg~lc C~C 200 CU NtA :U5 430.0 0.5 I~~ 0.79 169.15 ".90 SJ.41~. HS.O/ 8050 0.0553 561.879 3/.061 155.3 I
1.0DGING
320 Muld 125 RM N/A 9.9< 12415 0.5 I(;l(r.~ 0.57 :;S".II 5.60 53.4r.~ 1060.)) 8050 0.1317 561.379 7~.009 59207
RECREATIONAL
4)0 Golf Coun.c 145 I AC NlA 5.06 13J.7 0.5 100"/. 0.71 1&6.14 '.40 53.4r.~ 67).20 1050 0.OSJ6 561.879 46.919 ;.::4.06
..... "-tovic Thc.a1er 6 I SCR NlA 151.13 920.0 0.5 /~~ 1.24 ,510.39 4.40 53.47".4 1J41.9. 8050 0.1667 561.179 9).666 '15.610Q2,
492 Rxquct Club )).000 1.000 SF GilA 17.1" 565.6 0.5 I~~ 1.07 )02.61 4.40 .S3.4"'.4 711.94 1050 0.0814 561.179 49.692 1,5005.82
49. BowlOng AJlq 24,000 1.000 SF GilA D.:;) 799.9 0.5 1O<.r/. 1.06 42).96 4.40 53.'r.~ 991.44 8050 0.1239 561.179 69.620 2.900.82
INSOTUTIONAI.
~ Chw'ch 10.000 1.000 SF GilA 9.:;2 9J.2 0.5 I~~ 0.75 )4.95 ",40 53.'7"/. '2.23 8050 0.0102 561.179 5.1l9 5739:;:
S66 In)' Cue COlier 5.000 1.000 SF GilA 79."16 396.J 0.5 :?~% I.n 17.6Jl 1.50 S;.4,./. 70.32 8050 0.00&7 561.879 4.909 9&172
591 LodgcIFnlem:LI (HgW:acion 500 1 MEM NlA 0.29 . 14~.O 0.5 lOll"/. I.OJ R63 ".40 . 53.47"/. /75.69 &050 O.02IS 561.879 12.263 2453
MEDICAL
6/0 Ho>piW )00 '1 BED NtA 12.6& J&04.0 0.5 I~~ 0.5 951.00 5.00 53.47".4 2542.50 1050 .0.JI5S 561.879 In.46J 591.54
620 ~ Ho<nc 100 , BED Nt". 261 261.0 0.5 I~'. 0.5 65.25 5.00 53.4r/. 174.45 3050 . 0.02/7 561.879 12.176 121.76-
6.10 Clinic 5.000 1.000 5F GilA 2:;: 79 119.0 0.5 I~~ I 59.4S 5.00 .s)A7~~ 159.01 1050 0.019& 561.879 II. 09S ~.2:19.69
OFFICI:
710 GcncnJ Officc Bkfg 50.000 1.000 SF GilA 16.62- 631.0 0.5 100"/. US 560.9:;. 5.00 .s:;.47-/. 1499.6J ro50 0.116; 561.179 104.bn 2,09).-tS
no ~ Officclllc!s. 40.000 1.000 SF GBA JO.99 12.i9.6 0.5 100"/. L25 n..75 5.00 53.4~. 2071:29 8050 0.257; 561.179 I-I-a,sn J.614.34
750 offic. Pm . :ns.ooo 1.000 SF GBA 11.67 <4316.3: 0.5 I~~. 1.25 27;5.16 5.00 53.4r.~ nl2.44 8050 0.9084 561.1'n 510,:;9S 1.>61.06
no Busin= r.rt 325.000 1.000 . SF GBA I.I.SS .511 0 0.5 I~~ 1.04 234S.n 5.00 S3.'r.~ 6271.2& ro50 0.7790 561.879 437.7:7 1.3-16.85
COMMERCIAL
112 Bids. MaIc:rUJ1I Lumba SlOl~ 20.000 1.000 SF GilA JO 55 611.0 0.5 55% 1.05 176.43 <4.40 53.47"/. 415.07 6050 0.0516 561.81'9 ~8.97:! 1.4-1S.~S
31' S~I)' Rcu-' CcnlCf JO.OOO 1.000 SF GLA 4067 12:0.. 0.5 5W. 0.92 .108,09 4.:10 B.4"'/. n6.24 8050 0.0902 561.879 50.690 1.689.68
115 D~1oCoun( Store 90.000 1.000 SF GIl.... 59.9U 5:#91.0 0.5 55./. 0.57 1.5.... 2.75 5;.4J-J"~ 12~Z.57 6050 0.154' 561.579 16. Tl9 96J.66
816 I-hsdw;uelp~1 SlOf'~ 27.000 1.000 SF GBA 51.29 1l8..8 0.5 H'~ 0.95 '361.79 2.2S 53.47"/. 4)526 8050 O.OS.I 561.879 JO)&O 1.12S.:!O
117 Nursery/Gvdcn Score 9.000 1.000 SF GnA ;6.03 324.7 0.5 55~. 1.03 91.91 2.75 B.47"/. IH.ZS 8050 0.0168 561.879 9.-140 1....S.S3
120 Reuil
G-:!S.OOO sf 12.SOO 1.000 SF GLA I><.O~ 1926.0 0.5 . JO'".t. 0.9 260.01 2.00 S].4~~ 271.05 1050 0.034S 561.179 19.401 t.~S2.6)
25.000-50.000 sf 37;500 1.000 SF GI.A 102.08 382:S,O 05 :;-r/. 0.92 651.5:; .2.25 53.47"/. 7&3;&:; . 8050 0.097~ S61J119 54.7" 1.'58.95
50.000-99.\199 sf 75.000 1.000 SF . GI.A 71.12 5904.0 0.5 5~~ 0.93 1]72.6& 2.50' 53.-17"7. 18)4.93 8050 0.2279 561.179 12&.076 1.707.67
100.000-199.999 sf 150.000 /.000 SF GLA' 60.70 910S.0 O.~ 6 I"/. 0.93 2512.63 2.15- 5::;."7';~ 3797.57 1050 0.4711 561.17Q 265.065 1,767.10
200.000-299.999 sf 250.000 1.000 SF GLA SO. 12 12530.0' 0.5 b~;'. 0.9-> )'JU.70 3.00 5J"'~/. 6)29.~ 1050 0.1$62 561.179 4-.U.n6 1.161.'0
1)1 Quury Rc:suunn. 9.000 1.000 SF GO.... 9:?b7 3J4.0 0.5 ~~~. 0.8J 2SJ.81 4.40 5:;.4'r/. b07.7" . 8050 0.0&29 ~61.879 ~.607 5./73.58
832 Uigh TwnovCf Sil-Jo-o Jlcr..... . 5.000 '.000 SF GilA 206.J6- IOJ I.S 0.5 52%' 0.79 211.9':; 2.50 n.'7"/. 28:;.)0 80SO O.OJS! 561.119 19.774 J.9s.a.79
8)) . f~ food w/o onve lhru 2.&00 1.000 SF GilA 7'>0.00 2212.0 0.5 52"':~ 0.54 .lIO.~ i.5o S}.4-r.:~ 415.15 E050 0.0516 561.179 2'.977 IO)4S 8)
IJ. F.ua.Food wI Orlvc Ihru 3.000 1.000 SF GllA un. I:? 1&4)b,4 OJ. . ~::'Y. O.~8 2$5.97 2.}0 5J.47-/. )82.21 '050. o.(),n.~ ~61.879 20.682 . J.a~.02
1.0 'Aul&) (Me C cnlct 6.000 1.000 SF GLA 11.16 95.2 0.5 7.;..,. I J5.!1 ...40 B.47"/. 12.S'" 1050 O.OIOJ 561.879 S.7S~ 963.6.
8451146 Service Sl31. w/CoovcrUc:ncc 1.000 1.000 SF GLA 8.6.06 '.6.1 0.5 2~/. 0.67 62.JS 0.75 53A7";~ 25.01 6050 0:.00:;1 561.879 1.7.15 1,74>.3:'7
847 Self Savicc Cu w..~ 5 I STL GI.A 101.00 5'0.0 0.5 5~~ 0.74 99.90 2.25 S3.4-r;~ 120.19 S050 0.0149 56/.179 .5.3$9 1.677.78
841 ruc Slore 5.000 1.000 SF GOA 2J.904 119.7 0.5 .6/':1. I J6.51 3.26 . B.47~~ 6J.6< 8050 .0.0079 561.879 4.~.a2 153.38
8~1 Convcnic~ SIOfC (24 lIr) 2.000 1.000 SF GBA 7J7.99 1476.0 0.5 n~. 0.67 108.75 0.75 S3."7~/_ ..a;.62 8050 0.0054 . 561.879 :;.~S 152.:!AJ
(WiD suolinc pumps) o..~
853 Convenience wi &U pumps 2.~ 1.000 SF GOA 95~.20 :nES 0 :?2~-;' 0.67 /76.00 0.75 SJ.47"l. 70.55 5050 ooou 561.879 .a.9:!6 . 1.970.$2
890 FUnVlurc Store 80.000 1.000 5F GU", ;,S.a .'.07.2 0.5 j:;,-/. 0.14 68.JG 4.40 53.47"/. 160.8& SOSQ O.O:WO 561)17'9 11.21~ 1-10.";7
SERVICES
911 W~l;-iDB.;aIlk: 8.000 1.000 SF eu,\. 140,61 1124.9 0.5 ~O% 1.2) 207.54 1.50 }:;.4"'/. 166.46- 8050 0.0207 561.87. 11.619 I."~:!.J!
912 D,i",c'laBM\l: 3.500 1.000 SF GBA 279."; 978.0 0.5 j~-;' 1.56 218.&5 1.50 53.,n-l. 18;.55 8050 0.0228 561.879 I2.S 12 3.6W..a7
Attachment No. 2
.. TRANSPORTATION.
IMPACT FEE UPDATE
September 1997
Conklin, Porter and Holmes - Engineers, Inc.
1104 East Robinson. Street
Orlando, Florida 32801
(407) 425-0452
CPH Project No. W0459.00
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The existing Transportation Impact Fee method, established in 1990, will remain unchanged.
Appendix B of this fee method will be revised based on the information contained in the "City of
Winter Springs Transportation Study" dated August 1997. Revisions were made to the roadway
capital improvements program which resulted in a reduced construction cost per lane mile.
Based'on the required capital improvements outlined and described in the City of Winter Springs
Transportation Study, August 1977, the Transportation Impact Feecan be adjuste'd (decreased).
The reduction is based on an approximately 40 percent reduction in the cost per lane mile of
roadway construction, which directly results in a 40 percent reduction in the single family, multi-
family and commercial/industrial impact fees.
As part of our project task, we were asked to evaluate whether the projected revenues would be
sufficient to construct the capital improvements projects. Based on our analysis contained
herein, the program will be adequately funded. The identified transportation expenditures for
1996 thru 20 I 0 (the planning period) total approximately $5.678.463. The projected revenues
during the planning period plus the impact fee fund balance as of October I, 1996, total
approximately $5'.823.370. We believe that the future 'revenues combined with existing funds
will be adequate to fund the required transportation capital improvements.' We recommend that
the new lane mile cost of $561.879 and the associated revisions to Appendix B ,of the
Transportation Impact Fee of the Code of Ordinances be adopted.
W045900, FEE/lmz
. ,
CAPIT AL IMPROVEMENTS
The proposed capital improvements program is shown in Tables 1 and 2. The program is divided
into four phases through the planning period (1996 - 2010) and represents the roadway projects
necessary to maintain traffic flow throughout the City of Winter Springs. The proposed capital
improvements program is based on the results of the City of Winter Springs Transportation
Study, Table 3 illustrates the calculation of the lane miles of proposed construction which was
used to re-calculate the cost per lane mile for the City of Winter Springs transportation capital
improvements program. The total cost of the program, $5.678.463, was divided by 10.1062 lane
miles which resulted in a cost per lane mile of$561.879. The fee table of the existing ordinance,
Appendix B, was revised by inputting the new lane mile cost. The existing Appendix B
contained in the City Code of Ordinances was based on $936,827 per lane mile. This represents
a decrease in the transportation impact fee of approximately 40 percent. The new Appendix B is
attached.
W045900.FEE/lmz
TABLE 1
NEEDED CITY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
WINTER SPRINGS TRANSPORT A TION STUDY
Facility E.mm Th Improvement ~ QQsJ
Panama Road . Moss Road Edgemon Ave. . Pave & Drainage $114,827
Hayes Road North of Pavement on
Bahama Road Hayes Road Pave & Drainage $214,678
Moss Road Panama Road . Pavement on
Moss Road rave & Drainage $169,250
Hayes Road Replace Bridge/ $408,158
Raise Road
Moss Road Replace Bridge/ $4i 1,550
Raise Road
SUBTOT AL PHASE I $1,318,463
. Bahama Road Shore Road. Hayes Road Paving & Drainage II $350,000
Panama Road Shore Road Moss Road Paving & Drainage. II $840,000
Fisher Road Panama Road City Limits . Paving & Drainage JI $750,000
Hayes Road Intersection w/S.R. 434 Add Tum Lanes Il $150,000
SUBTOTAL PHASE I1 $2,090,000
Moss Road S.R.419 S.R.434 4 Lanes III $1,000,000
SUBTOTAL PHASE IiI $ 1,000,000
Winter Spgs. Blvd. NOl1hern Way . Northern Way Add Turn lanes IV $250,000
. (east section)
SUBTQT AL PHASE IV $250,000
TOTAL (1996-2010) ROADS $4,658,463
W045900.FEE/lmz
TABLE 2
NEEDED CITY TRANSPORT A nON IMPROVEMENTS
Traffic Signals
CJlli
$ 85,000
$ 85,000
$ 85,000
$ 85,000
$ 75,000
$ 80,000
$ 75,000
$ 75,000
$ 75,000
$ 75,000
$ 75,000
S 75,000
$1,020,000
S.R. 434 & Tuscora Drive
S.R. 434 & Vista Willa Drive
S.R. 419 & Edgemon Avenue
S.R. 419 & Moss Road
Moss Road & Dolphin
Winter Springs Boulevard & Northern Way
Northern Way &'Shetland Avenue
Northern Way & Tuscora Drive.
Northern Way & Vista Willa Drive
Trotwood Boulevard & Northern Way
Edgemon A venue & Shepard Road
Winter Springs Boulevard & Northern Way (easternmost)
SUBTOTAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS
W045900.FEEllnlZ
. TABLE 3
LANE MILE CALCULATIONS
Phase I
Facility From Th Lane Miles
Panama Road Moss Road Edgemon Ave. .3277
Hayes Road North of Pavement on
Bahama Road Hayes Road .6193
Moss Road Panama Road Pavement on
Moss Road .5.038
Hayes Road Bridge .3788
Moss Road Bridge .3788
Phase II
Bahama Road Shore Road Hayes Road 0,7576
Panama Road Shore Road Moss Road 1.7803
Fisher Road Panama Road City Limits 1.6288
Haves Road Intersection w/S.R. 434 0.1894
.
Phase III
Moss Road S,R.41.9 S.R.434 2.1212
Phase IV
Winter Spgs. Blvd, Northern Way Northern Way 1.4205
( east section)
TOT AL LANE MILES 10.1062
(1996-2010)
~
W045900.FEE/rmz
W045900.FEE/tmz
PROJECTED REVENUES
We prepared, as Table 4, a commercial/industrial development mix over the proposed planning
period to approximate the amount of revenue which would be provided by the projected
commercial/industrial development. The development mix was used to illustrate how various
development types on the vacant land would provide the anticipated growth. The resulting
revenue was calculated from the proposed Appendix B. Within the planning period (1996-2010),
it was projected that 4,028 employees would be added within the commercial/industrial tracts of
the City of Winter Springs. This was based on 16 employees per buildable acre. The planning
data received indicated that approximately 252 buildable acres would be developed for
commercial/industrial use over the planning period. This is total gross acreage and actual net
building square footage for estimating impact fees was obtained by using 20% of this figure as
the actual building size available. This figure is based on using 20% of the site for public rights-
of-way/easements, 20% for retention requirement, 20% for parking, 20% for open space and 20%
for building. This resulted in building square footage of 2,195,000 square feet during the
planning period. We used this number as 'our target value in Table 4 to estimate the approximate
v.alue of revenues from the transportation impact fee. Please note that the square footage in
Table 4 is slightly higher than the target value. We estimate the revenue to be approximately
$2.141.989 over the planning period.
The estimated impact fee revenues for single family construction are $1.150.216, based on the
construction of 1,291 single family units. During the planing period, 1,667 single family units
were projected. Of these, 376 units are covered by exi'sting developer agreements and were paid
for by impact fee credits. The estimated impact fee revenues for multi-family construction are
$374,976, based on the construction of 744 multi-family units. The estimated balance in the
impact fee fund at the beginning of the planning period (October 1,1996) was $2.156.189. The
addition of these figures produces a grand total of$5.823.370 which is roughly equivalent to the
capital improvements program for the planning period.
W045900,FEE/tml
. .."
TABLE 4
PROJECTED 'IMPACT FEE / DEVELOPMENT MIX (1996 - 2010)
Proj, Average Total Square Fee Total
Category Units Qty. Size Units Footage Per Unit Proj. Fee
( 1000)
INDUSTR.IAL
General Light Industrial 1000 SF 4 100000 400 400. 914.75 $365,900
Warehousing 1000 SF 2 100000 200 200 1154,29 $230,858
M irii. Warehouse SU 3 500 1500 375 26.44 $39,660
LODGING
Motel 'RJvl 125 125 37.5 592.07 $74.009
RECREA TIONAL
Movie Theater SCR 6 6 120 15610,92 $93,666
INSTITUTIONAL
Church 1000 SF 3 10000 3'0 30 573.93 $17,218
Day Care 1000 SF 4 5000 20 20 981.72 $19,634
Lodge/fraternal MEM 2 500 1000 100 24,53 $24,530
OFFICE
General Office Bldg. 1000 SF 50000 50 50 2093.45 $104.672
COMMERCIAL
Bldg', Mtls.lLumber 1000 SF 1 80000 80 80 1448.58 $115,886
Specialty Retail 1000 SF 1 30000 30 30 1689.68 $50,690
Discount Store 1900 SF 2 100000 200 200 963.66 $192,732
Nursery/Garden Store 1000 SF I 10000 10 10 1048.88 S 1 0,489
Retail (25,000 to 50,000 SF) 1000 SF 4 37500 150 150 1458.95 $218,843
Retail (50,000 to 99,999 SF) 1000 SF 2 75000 150 150 1707,67 $256,151
Quality Restaurant 1000 SF 2. 9000 18 18 5178.58 $93,214
High Turnover Sit-down Rest 1000 SF 2 5000 10 10 . 3954,79 $39,548
Fast w/o Drive thru 1000 SF '1 2800 5.6 5,6 10348,83 $57,953
..
Fast w/ Drive thru 1000 SF 2 3000 6 6 8894,02 $53,364
Auto Care Center 1000 SF 3 . 6000 18 18 963.64 $17,346
Tire Store 1000 SF 2 5000 10 10 888.38 $8,884
Convenience Store w/pumps 1000 SF 2 2500 5 5' 1970,52 $9,853
Furnitllre Store 1000 SF 2 80000 160 160 140,37 $22,459
Walk.in Bank 1000 SF 1 8000 8 . 8 1452.32 $11,619
Drive Thru Bank 1000 SF 1 3500 3.5 3,5 3660,47 $12,812
TOT A LS 2196,6 $2,14[,989
i
APPENDIX B ".
NEW AVE ~~ OF VEHICLE NEW DAILY NEW CIT\' .
TOTAL ONE OF PER CENT DAll Y DAILY TRIPS TRIP MILES ON THE VEH. MILES lOSD STREET CUlUlENT UPDATED
ITEM LAND USE TYPE GROUP GBM DAILY DAllY TWO TR.lP OF DISCR.lB A 1TRJBlTT ABLE LENGTH CITY SIl\.EET ON TIlE CITY PER LANE SYSTEM COST PER TOTAL TOTAL COST
CODE MID RANGE UNITS GLA TR.lP RATE TR.lPS ENOS NEW TR.lPS FAcrOR TO SITE (MilES) SYSTEM SYSTEM CAPACITY LANE MilES LANE "'OLE COSTlSlTE PElt U:'IIT
INDUSTRIAL
110 GcncnJ Light InduSlri~1 100.000 1.000 SF GBA 6.45 645.0 O.S 100% 1.52 490.20 5.00 53.47"/0 1l10.55 S050 0.1621 5S6\.S79 S91.H5 1914.75
110 Indamr1.aJ Palk )00.000 1.000 SF GBA 1.50 2250.0 O.S I~~ I.(l9 I 226.2S S.OO 53.47% 3271.31 SOSO 0.4071 S61.879 221.1'26 76'1. 7~
150 Wuchousin& 100.000 1.000 SF GBA 7.11 711.0 O.S l~/. 1.74 61S.51 S.OO S3.47"/. 16S3.7S S050 0.20S4 S61.879 115.429 1.15~ 29
151 ~fioi-WMdl(:lUsc 500 1 SU GBA 0.26 1l0.0 0.5 1O<r.~ 1.09 70.SS S.OO S3.47~. 119.42 SOSO 0.02J5 561.S79 1l.221 26~4
RESIDENTIAL
:no Single F;lfJuly Dd~.ed 300 CU NlA 9.46 2338.0 0.5 100"1. 1.03 1461.57 4.90 53.47"/0 3129.36 80S0 0.47>7 S61.S79 267.214 S'J().9S
220 low..osc A~ctments 300 CU NlA 6.;.a 1902.0 O.S I()(~'. 0.93 SS4.43 4.90 53.47"1. 2311.23 .80S0 0.2879 561.879 161.740 5;9.1)
230 Low.rise Residential Condo 200 CU NlA 5S7 1174.0 0.5 100"1. 0.94 S51.78 4.90 S3.47"/. 144S.6S SOSO 0.1796 561.S79 100.906 50-15J
240 Mob~c Home P.,k 200 CU NlA U5 970.0 05 100% 1..14 552.90 4.90 S3.47"1. 144S.61 SOSO O. I IlOO S61.S79 101.111 ;OS S6
252 Congreg:lIC C~IC 200 CU NlA 2.15 430.0 O.S' I~~ 0.79 169.SS 4.90 53.47"/.. 445.01 8050 O.OSSl S61.879 31.061 IH.J I
LODGING
320 Motcl 125 RM N/A 9.94 124:?S 0.5 I~~ 0.S7 354.11 S.6O 53.47"'/. 1060.33 8050 ODI1 S61.S79 74.009 59:! 07
RECREATIONAL
410 Golf Cowse 145 I AC NlA 506 13J.7 0.5 100"/, 0.71 286,14 ....40 S3.47"/o 67).20 SOSO 0.0836 S61;879. 46.989 31.4.06.
444 Movie Thuler 6 I SCR N/A I Sl.33 920.0 O.S 100% 1.24 570.19 4.40 Sl.4J-/. 1141.94 8050 0.1667 S61.879 91.666 IS.610.92
<II?1 RAcquet Club lJ.OOO 1.000 SF GilA 17.14 S6S.6 O.S 100"'.1. 1.07 302.61 4.40 S3.47"h 711.94 8050 0.0884 S61.S79 49.692 1.505.82
494 Bowling Ailey 24.000 1,000 SF GBA JJ.D 799.9 0.5 IOO:~ 1.06 -423.96 4.40 53..-.,./. 997.44 8050 0.1239 S61.S79 69.620 2.Q()().S:?
INSTITUTIONI\L
S60 Chucch 10.000 1.000 Sf G8~ 9.3:! 91.2 0.5 I~~ 0.7S H,9S 4.40 53.47"/. 82.2) .80S0 0.0102 561.879 S.739 57.3.93
Sb6 Day Cuc Caller S.OOO 1.000 SF GBA 7Q.26 196.3 0.5 25% 1.77 87.68 1.50 53.4?-/. 70.32 80SO 0.0087 S61.879 4.909 9817'1.
59\ LodgcIFr:UCTW (XpniDlkwa Soo I MEM NlA 0.29 145.0 0.5 IOO:~ 1.03 746S 4.40 . S3.4W. I7S.69 80SO 0.021S 561.879 12.163 245:;
~tEDICAL
610 HospiuJ 100 '1 BED NlA 12.63 1804.0 0.5 I~~ 0.1 951.00 5.00 S3.47"1. 2542.50 80SO O.JISS 561.879 177.463 S91.~4
610 NuDwg Home 100 I BED NlA 261 261.0 OS 100"/. O.S 65.25 5.00 5JA7Y. 174.4S 80SO . 0.~11 S61.879 1::.176 121.76
630 Clinic 5.000 1.000 SF GBA 2::;.79 119.0 O.S 100"/0 1 S9.48 S.OO S3"r.~ 159.01 SOSO 0.019S S61.879 1I.00S 2.21969
OFFICE
710 G=cr.al Office Bldg. SO.OOO 1.000 Sf GBA 16.62 SJI.O 0.5 100"/. US 560.93 5.00 5:i:4-r..:. 1499.63 8050 O.IIG::; S61.S79 104.672 2.093.45
7!O M~ Olf",c Bldg. 40,000 1.000 SF GBA 30.99 1239.6 0.5 I()()";.... US 774.75 S.OO S3.47% 2071.29 80SO 0.2Sn 561.879 14-l.YD J.614 ].I
750 Office Park :;75.000 1,000 SF GBA 11.67 4376.3 0.5 I~.. 1.25 2735.16 5.00 S3.47"/o 7) 12.44 SOSO 0.9084 S61.~79 S10.391 1.361.06
770 Business put.; ]25.000 1.000 . SF GBA D.SS 4511.0 O.S 1 OO"/~ 1.04 2345.72 S.OO 51.47"1. 6271.:2& SOSO 0.7790 S6I,S79 437.T!7 1.346 8S
COMMERCIAL
SI2 Bldg. M.iucrialsll.&m1bcr" Scole 20.000 1.000 SF GilA 10.55 611.0 0.5 SS~. LOS 176.43 4.40 53.47"/. 41S.07 8050 0.OS16 561.879 :!S.972 1.4-11.SS
114 Spcci.J'Y Rcu~ Ccu.... 30.000 1.000 SF GLA 40.67 12:!0.1 0.5 5W. 0.92 ;01.69 4.40 53.47% 726.24 SOSO 0.0902 S61.S79 SO.690 1.6S9.68
liS Discount SIOfC 90.000 1.000 SF GBA 59.9V 5391.0 O.S 55'1. 0.57 . S4S.04 2.7S 53.4J-1. 1242.57 80SO 0.1544 S61.S79 ,S6.719 <)63.66
SI6 lbrdwareIP.atm Slorc 27.000 1.000 SF GBA SI.2' IU4.! 0.5 55'-. 0.9S 361.79 2.25 S).4-r..~ 435.26 aoso 0.05-11 S61.879 30)30 1,125.~O
817 NuncryJG.ude4 SlOfC 9.000 1.000 Sf GBA 36,Oa: 324.7 0.5 5S% 1.03 91.98 2.75 5347-/. DS.2S 8050 0.0161 561.879 9.~..aO 1.048.88
120 Rct.a.il
0.15.000 sf 12.500 1.000 SF GLA 1540' 1926.0 O.S 3oe/. 0.9 ~60.01 2.00 S3.47"1. 171.05 80S0 0.0;45 S61.879 19.401 I.S52.63
1S.000,50.000 sf :n.5OO 1.000 SF GlA 1020. )828.0 O.S 37'-. 0.92 651.5; 2.2S S3.4~~ 71]:1'; 8050 0.0974 561.879 54.711 1.4S8.9S
50.000-99.999 sf 75.000 1.000 SF GLA 7..72 \904.0 0.5 50"1. 0.93 1l71.68 2.S0. . SJ.4~~ 1!3~.9J 80SO 0.227'1 561.879 12S,076 1.'107...7
100.1>00.199.999 sf 1 SO.OOO 1.000 SF eLA 60.70 910S.0. 0.5 61% 0.93 25&2.6J 2.7S 5).4~. 3797.51 8050 0.4711 S61.879 26S.0bS 1,767.10
200.000.299.999 sf 250.000 1.000 SF GlA ~O.12 12530.0 O.S 67~'.. 0.94 3945.70 3.00 Sl.47"/o 6329.29 80SO 0.7$62 561.879 ....1.776 1.767.10
1)1 QualilY ROI~~t 9.000 1.000 SF e8.~ 92.67 834.0 O.S S~/. 0.S3 2S].12 4...aO 53.4.,./. 667.74 10SO O.OS2? 561.179 4...607 5.171 S8
132 High T umoVd" Sil-down Rc:sl, . 5.000 1.000 SF GBA 206,:;6 1011.8 05 52% 0.79 211.93 ~.SO S3.47"/. 213.30 sosa 0.0352 S61.S79 19.774 J.954.79
113 faSl food w/a on...c lhru 2.500 1.000 SF enA ,7')ljOO 2212.0 0.5 ~:~~ 0.54 31O.~ 2.50 5).47"'/. 4'5.15 SO 50 0,0516 561.&7<) -:!1.977 10.H& 8)
8H faSl Food w/ Drivc lhn.I 3.000 1.000 SF eUA u]:!.12 13%.4 O.~ . 5~% O.~8 1SS.97 2.50 Sl.47"/, 382.27 80S0. o.o.n~ 561.879 26.6&2 1.89-1.02-
84a Auto Cue Center ...000 1.000 SF GlA 1~.16 95.2 0.5 7.;,-. I 35.2' 4.40 53.47"/. 12.&4 SOSO 0.0103 561,879 S.7S! %1.64
1411846 Service Stili. .....JConvcnicnc.: 1.000 1.000 SF GLA S46.06 '46.' 0.5 22% 0.67 62.35 0.75 5:;.4""/. 25.01 80S0 0.00':;1 561.S79 1.745 1.7-15.37
147 Sdf Savicc eu w ~J. S 1 STL GLA 108.00 540.0 0.5 51W. 0.74 \19.90 2.25 Sl.47"/, .2019 8050 0.0149 S61.879 1.3!9 1.677.78
841 Tife Slore 5.000 1.000 SF GUA 21.94 119.7 0.5 61% I 36.51 ).26 S3.47"1. 6J.64 8050 0.0079 561.879 oI.~"2 S8S.38
151 Convenience SlOfC (24 hI) 2.000 1.000 SF eUA 737.99 1476.0 0.5 22~/. 0.67 IOS.78 0.75 Sl.4r.~ 43.62 80S0 00054 )61.879 3.0-.5 1.522.4.1
(w/o psolinc pumps)
151 Convenience wI gas pumps 2.500 1.000 SF eRA ?S~.20 2JS' 0 o.~ 22~/.' 0.67 176.00 0.75 SJ.47~. 70.58 8050 00088 561.879 ~.916 1,970,~::!
190 FUrNlUrC Slare SO.OOO 1.000 SF GUA i.S~ .;07.~ 0.5 5:W. 014 6S.18 4.40 S3.47"/. 160.88 80S0 0.0200 561.S79 11,229 1-10.37
SERVICES
911 Will:-in 8V\k. 8.000 1.000 SF GBA 140.61 1124.9 0.5 30"'1. 1.23 207.54 1.50 53.4"'/. 166.46 8050 0.0207 561.879 11.619 1.452.32-
912 Drivc-inBua 3.500 1.000 SF eBA 279..13 978.0 0.5 30-.t. 1.56 228.85 I.SO 53.4~~ IS,.SS SOSO O.O2:!1 S6\ 879 12.812 "3.660.47
\