HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996 04 22 Regular Item G
:<or
COMMISSION AGENDA
ADD ON
ITEM
G
REGULAR X
CONSENT
INFORMATIONAL
April 22. 1996
Meeting
MGR/lt/I'( fDEPT ~
Authorization
REQUEST: Public Works Department/Stormwater Division Requesting Approval of the
City Manager's Letter of Objection to Altamonte Springs Permit Application
to Discharge Storm water into the Gee Creek Basin
PURPOSE: The purpose of this Board item is to authorize the City Manager to file a Letter of
Objection with the St. John's River Water Management District to the City of
Altamonte Springs permit application for the discharge of stormwater from Lake
Orienta into the Gee Creek basin..
CONSIDERA nONS:
The City of Altamonte Springs has submitted a permit application to the St. John's
River Water Management District known as the Lake Orienta Flood Avoidance Plan to
construct a stormwater pumping station to pump excess stonnwater from Lake Orienta to
the Gee Creek basin. Lake Orienta is located in the Wekiva River basin. The permit
application is to discharge three cubic feet per second, approximately two million gallons
per day, during the "dry season" which is November I to April 30. Lake Orient a has no
positive outfall with the exception of two drainage wells which are unable to keep up with
the excessive rainfall from the past two years. A previous plan to pump to the Wekiva
River has met resistance from the "Friends of the Wekiva" due to the designation of the
river as an Outstanding Florida Waterway, hence the alternate plan to the Gee Creek
basin. .
'.
'it
April 22, 1996
Regular Agenda Item G
Page 2.
Studies completed by CPH for our Stormwater Master Plan have identified
deficiencies along Gee Creek at Edgemon Avenue, Moss Road, Hacienda Village, Hayes
Road, Shore Road and Alton Road. These have been confirmed by a recent study
prepared by Singhofen & Associates for Seminole County. The aforementioned structures
and creek channel do not meet a minimum level of service of "C" for the 25 year storm
event. The LOS of "C" means roads remain passable.
ISSUE ANALYSIS:
There are existing deficiencies along Gee Creek for the 25 year storm event. They
are mostly road closures with the exception of Hacienda Village which would have
damage to residents homes. The addition of any flow which is currently not part of the
Gee Creek basin may adversely impact the citizens of Winter Springs to greater degree
than they would already would be impacted. Altamonte Springs has conceded that they
are unable to address in their computer model the many scenarios which could arise from
the cumulative impact of such a large volume of water over an extended period of time.
Our concerns are twofold: first, a policy of diverting stormwater from one basin to
another which has existing deficiencies is unacceptable; second, the cumulative impact of
the reduction in the storage capability of the upstream lakes in Casselberry has not been
acceptably addressed and would most likely result in adversely effecting downstream
communities.
-'~
April 22, 1996
Regular Agenda Item G
Pagel
The City of Casselberry has already ftloo a letter of objection with the SJRWMD
on Altamonte Springs application as has the Friends of Lake Jesup. The SJRWMD Board
will consider the permit application by AItamonte Springs at their May 14, 1996 board
meeting.
ALTERNATIVES:
I. Take no action on the City of Altamonte Springs permit application.
2. Object to the City of Altamonte Springs permit application
3. Object to the City of Altamonte Springs permit application with the condition
that the objection be withdrawn if all deficiencies are corrected to a minimum level of
service "c" for the 25 year storm event at the expense of Altamonte Springs.
FUNDING:
Improvements to the Moss Road bridge and Hayes Road bridge are currently
underway. These improvements will be paid from the Transportation Impact Fee Fund.
Additional maintenance improvements to Gee Creek over the next ten years will be funded
from the Stormwater Utility Fund.
.,
April 22, 1996
Regular Agenda Item G
PageA-
RECOMMENDATION:
I am recommending that the City Manager be authorized to file a letter of
objection with the St. John's River Water Management District regarding the City of
Altamonte Springs' permit application known as the Lake Orienta Flood Hazard
Avoidance Plan with the condition that the objection will be withdrawn is all deficiencies
are corrected to a level of service "C" for the 25 year storm event at their expense.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
The letter will be mailed April 23, 1996 for the SJRWMD Board to consider at
their May 14, 1996 meeting.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Proposed City Manager Letter
COMMISSION ACTION:
I
" COMMISSION AGENDA
ADD-ON I T E M G
REGULAR X
CONSENT
INFORMATIONAL
April 22. 1996
Meeting
MGR IDEPT
Authorization
/r
REQUEST: Public Works Department/Stonnwater Division Requesting Approval of the
City Manager's Letter of Objection to Altamonte Springs Permit Application
to Discharge Stormwater into the Gee Creek Basin
PURPOSE: The purpose of this Board item is to authorize the City Manager to file a Letter of
Objection with the St. John's River Water Management District to the City of
Altamonte Springs permit application for the discharge of stormwater from Lake
Orienta into the Gee Creek basin..
CONSIDERATIONS:
The City of Altamonte Springs has submitted a permit application to the St. John's
River Water Management District known as the Lake Orient a Flood Avoidance Plan to
construct a stormwater pumping station to pump excess stormwater from Lake Orient a to
the Gee Creek basin. Lake Orient a is located in the Wekiva River basin. The permit
application is to discharge three cubic feet per second, approximately two million gallons
per day, during the "dry season" which is November 1 to April 30. Lake Orienta has no
positive outfall with tbe exception of two drainage wells which are unable to keep up with
the excessive rainfall from the past two years. A previous plan to pump to the Wekiva
River has met resistance from the "Friends ofthe Wekiva" due to the designation of the
river as an Outstanding Florida Waterway, hence the alternate plan to the Gee Creek
basin.
.~ :~
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
Ronald W. McLemore
City Manager
1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32708-2799
Telephone (407) 327-1800
MEMORANDUM
To: City Commission/Tuscawilla Residents
From: Ron McLemore, City Manager (I wvt
Date: April 22, 1996
Subj: Lake Tuscawilla
It is my understanding that Tuscawilla residents may be here tonight concerning recent
efforts of Public Works to Stormwater Maintenance Crews to retard the growth of Cat
tails in the lake and cutting back of undergrowth on the park side of the lake.
" l " . ~~~
In regard to this matter please find attached a memorandum from Don Wilson and Kip
Lockcuff regarding this matter.
'" {"
We invite persons interested in the lake to become involved in the public workshops that
will be going on in the near future regarding the Master Planning of Trotwood Park.
R WM/jp
attachment
,,;.
WINTER SPRINGS UTILITY I PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
110 NORTH FLAMINGO AVENUE
WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708
Telephone (407) 327-2669
Fax (407) 327-0942
April 22, 1996
TO:
Ron McLemore, City Manager
Don Wilson, Parks and Recreation Directo.r;p)
Kipton Lockcuff, P.E., Utility Director jIJ-
FROM:
RE:
Lake Tuscawilla
Recent complaints have been made regarding the herbicide spraying of the cattails along the
northern third of the shore of Lake Tuscawilla. This spraying was initiated in the fall of 1995 by
our contractor responsible for lake and retention pond management, Aquatic Biologists, Inc.
Lake Tuscawilla was put under contract in June, 1994 after numerous complaints about the
hydrilla infestation adversely affecting the fishing at this lake. Grass carp were subsequently
stocked which has controlled the hydrilla to date.
Lake Tuscawilla serves as a stormwater basin for Tusca Oaks, Tuscany Place, Northern Way and
portions ofTuscawilla Unit 6 (Cheetah Trail). We directed the contractor to systematically
address the cattail infestation on the northern shore ofLake.Tuscawilla from the dock to the :
drainage ditch outfall on the western shore. The reason for this direction was to improve lake
visibility and accessability for fishing. The area near the drainage ditch also needed to be cleared
for improved drainage. A survey map showing the affected areas is attached.
The cattail reduction has been implemented over a six month period to minimize the effect on the
wildlife which has produced successful results. Parks Dept. staff recently completed the trimming
of the wax myrtles along this shoreline as well as mowing and weedeating along the bank. There
are no plans to address the remaining two thirds of shoreline at this time, however, the cattails will
be maintained from encroaching any further into the lake. A conversation with Sam McKinney of
the Florida Game & Fresh Water Fish Commission revealed that while cattails are not noxious
weeds, they are the least desirable emergent vegetation and need to be controlled or replaced with
desirable emergents such as bulrushes, pickerel weed, spatterdock, etc.
File
~
~-
I"
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
CHECKLIST FOR DCA TRANSMITTAL
SA TTLE RIDGE COMPANIES
II. SUBMISSION PACKAGE
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR PROPOSED
LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT AND MAP
AMENDMENTS: [9J-11.006(1){b)]
Future Land Use Map Amendment of Battle Ridge Companies.
A. GENERAL:
SUBMIT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS A TOTAL
OF SIX (6) COPIES OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT PACKAGE.
THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT PACKAGE SHALL INCLUDE:
*
RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE STAFF, LOCAL PLANNING
AGENCY, LOCAL GOVERNING BODY: [9J-11.006(1 )(e)]
*
ALL PROPOSED TEXT, MAPS, AND SUPPORT DOCUMENTS
WHICH INCLUDE DATA AND ANALYSES IN THE FOLLOWING
FORMAT: [9J-11.006(1 )(b)]
1.
REQUEST SUMMARY:
a. OWNER: Battle Ridge Companies
b. BRIEF SUMMARY OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT'S
CONTENTS AND EFFECT/REASON FOR THE PROPOSED
AMENDMENT:
(1) SUMMARY:
The property owner has applied for annexation into
the City of Winter Springs. As part of the
annexation the property owner has applied for a
comprehensive plan amendment to change the
land use designation of the property from
Suburban Estates (Seminole County) to Low
Density Residential (Winter Springs), The effect of
the proposed amendment will be to change the
density from 1 dwelling unit per acre to up to 3.5
dwelling units per acre.
r
(2) REASON:
The reason for the proposed amendment is to
respond to market needs and to be consistent with
residential developments in the vicinity of the
property.
c. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: See Exhibit "A"
d. EXISTING ZONING: A-1 (County)
e. REQUESTED ZONING: R-1
f.
EXISTING USE:
Vacant
g. COMMENTS:
The property owner has filed an Application for
Annexation, an Application for Comprehensive Plan
Amendment and an Application for Rezoning.
2. PROPOSED TEXT CHANGES:
(AS REFLECTED ON NEW PAGES OF THE AFFECTED
ELEMENT, SHOWN IN A STRIKE THROUGH AND UNDERLINE
FORMAT OR SIMILAR EASILY IDENTIFIABLE FORMAT
IDENTIFYING THE PLAN AMENDMENT NUMBER ON EACH
PAGE AFFECTED): [9J-11.006(1 )(b)]
No text changes are requested.
3. PROPOSED MAP CHANGES:
PERTAINS ONLY TO A REGULATORY LAND USE MAP
AMENDMENT. [9J-11.006(1 )(b)]
a. THE BOUNDARY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY,
SURROUNDING STREET AND THOROUGHFARE
NETWORK, SURROUNDING FUTURE LAND USESr AND
NATURAL RESOURCES:
See Exhibit "A" and report of Breedlove, Dennis &
Associates, Inc. included within this application.
2
b. THE PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION(S) OF THE
SUBJECT PROPERTY AND ABUTTING PROPERTIES:
See Exhibit "A".
c. THE PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION(S)
FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY:
Low-density residential.
d. THE SIZE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IN ACRES OR
FRACTIONS THEREOF:
296.96 acres.
e. GENERAL LOCATION MAP IF THE LAND USE PLAN MAP
DOES NOT SHOW THE ENTIRE JURISDICTION:
See Exhibit "A".
f. MAP OR DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING LAND USES (NOT
DESIGNATIONS) OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND
SURROUNDING PROPERTIES:
See Exhibit "A ".
g. MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE DEVELOPMENT UNDER
EXISTING DESIGNATION FOR THE SITE:
One (1) unit per acre.
h. MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE DEVELOPMENT UNDER
PROPOSED DESIGNATION FOR THE SITE:
Three and one-half (3.5) units per acre.
I. LIST OF OBJECTIVE AND POLICIES OF THE FUTURE
LAND USE ELEMENT AND OTHER AFFECTED ELEMENTS
WITH WHICH THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT IS
COMPATIBLE: [9J-11.006(1 )(b)5.]
Goal 2, Objective A, Policies 1-3
Goal 2, Objective B, Policy 2
*
SUBMIT SIX (6) COPIES OF THE EVALUATION AND
APPRAISAL REPORT, IF DONE IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE
3
PROPOSED AMENDMENT, IF APPLICABLE, OR A LETTER
CERTIFYING THAT THE E.A.R. HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY SENT
TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AND EACH
REVIEW AGENCY AS LISTED UNDER 9J-11.008(8). [9J-
11.006(A)(d)]
III. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT ANALYSIS:
B. ANAL YSIS/RE-ANAL YSIS: [9J-11.006(A)(b)4.,5.. and 9J-5.005(2),
F.A.C.]
1. TRAFFIC CIRCULATION, INCLUDING: [9J-5.007] (See Exhibit "B")
a. ROADWAYS SERVING THE SITE (INDICATING LANEAGE,
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION AND RIGHT-OF-WAY,
CURRENT LOS, AND LOS STANDARD:
(1) FACILITY: State Road 434.
(2) DESIGN CAPACITY:
18,270 peak hour trips at LOS "E" for 2 lane minor urban
arterial roadway.
(3) CURRENT LOS:
13,125 peak hour trips at LOS "A ", per Seminole
County's 1994 Segment Counts.
(4) LOS STANDARD:
Peak hour interim LOS "E" of 18,270 trips through
1996 per City's Comprehensive Plan.
b. PROJECTED LOS (INDICATE YEAR) UNDER EXISTING
DESIGNATION:
1994: LOS "A"
2000: LOS "8", as a 2 lane principal urban arterial
c. PROJECTED LOS UNDER PROPOSED DESIGNATION:
There would be no change in the projected LOS under
the proposed designation.
4
':'
d. IMPROVEMENTS/EXPANSIONS:
Turn lanes and deceleration lanes to accommodate ingress and
egress to the site. No other improvements are necessary as a
result of this annexation.
e. EVALUATION OF CONSISTENCY WITH THE ADOPTED MPO
PLAN AND FOOT'S FIVE (5) YEAR TRANSPORTATION PLAN:
No significant road improvements required by this development.
f. AVAILABILITY OF ACCESS:
The project has access to -State Road 434.
g. APPROVED BY FOOT:
No driveway or connection permits have been applied for at this
time.
h. IDENTIFY THE OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES THAT SUPPORT
THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT; IDENTIFY ANY
INCONSISTENCIES AND EXPLAIN WHY THERE WILL BE NO
IMPACT(S):
Objective C, Policy 2
i. IS AMENDMENT TO THE TRAFFIC CJRCULA TION ELEMENT
NECESSARY AS A RESULT OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT?
No.
B. MASS TRANSIT:
Mass transit is currently not available to this portion of the city.
C. PORTS, AVIATION, AND RELATED FACILITIES:
N/A.
5
-;
D. HOUSING:
1. NEEDS ANALYSIS TO DETERMINE IF DEVELOPMENT IS
PROPOSED TO MEET THE NEEDS OF THE ANTICIPATED
POPULATION:
Winter Springs projects residential growth to a total population
of approximately 37,500 by 2010. This development is
consistent with the City's objectives for residential growth.
2. LAND REQUIREMENTS FOR THE TOTAL ESTIMATED HOUSING
NEED OF THE JURISDICTION:
The City projects the need for 1, 150 additional acres for
residential development by 2010 to allow development of up to
6,800 dwelling units with an average density of 5.91 DU per
acre. The proposed development, which involves annexation of
approximately 50 acres for residential development, will in part
address the City's need for additional land.
3. IDENTIFY THE OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES THAT SUPPORT
THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT:
Objective B.
4. IS AMENDMENT TO THE HOUSING ELEMENT NECESSARY AS
A RESULT OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT?
No.
E. SANITARY SEWER, SOLID WASTE, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT,
POTABLE WATER AND NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER
RECHARGE:
1. POTABLE WATER:
a. FACILITIES SERVING THE SITE, CURRENT LOS, AND
LOS STANDARD:
(1) FACILITY: Winter Springs Water and Sewer East
(2) DESIGN CAPACITY: 6. 1 MGD
(3) CURRENT LOS:
Average daily flow (ADF) = 2.02 MGD
6
-:
(4) LOS STANDARD:
125 gallons per capita per day (GCPD)
b. PROJECTED LOS (INDICATE YEAR) UNDER EXISTING
DESIGNATION:
1997 Projected ADF = 2.39 MGD
1997 Projected Design Capacity = 6. 1 MGD
2010 Projected ADF = 3.38 MGD
2010 Projected Design Capacity = 6. 1 MGD
c. PROJECTED LOS UNDER PROPOSED DESIGNATION:
1997 Projected ADF = 2.456 MGD
1997 Projected Design Capacity = 6. 1 MGD
2010 Projected ADF = 3.446 MGD
2010 Projected Design Capacity = 6. 1 MGD
d. IMPROVEMENTS/EXPANSIONS ALREADY
PROGRAMMED OR NEEDED AS A RESULT OF
PROPOSED AMENDMENT:
The developer proposes to extend a ten-inch (10") water
line along State Road 434 from its current termination at
Vista Willa Drive to the project site. With a projected
ADF in 2010 of 3.38 MGD and a projected design
capacity in 2010 of 6. 1 MGD, the City's potable water
treatment facility is adequate to service the proposed
development; therefore, expansion of the City's potable
water treatment facility is not necessary as a result of
this amendment.
e. IDENTIFY THE OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES THAT
SUPPORT THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT:
Objective A, Policies 1, 3, 4 and 5
Objective D, Policies 2a-e, 3 and 4
f. IS AMENDMENT TO THE POTABLE WATER SUB-
ELEMENT NECESSARY AS A RESULT OF THE
PROPOSED AMENDMENT?
No.
7
-:
2. SANITARY SEWER:
a. FACILITIES SERVING THE SITE, CURRENT LOS, AND
LOS STANDARD:
(1) FACILITY: Winter Springs Water and Sewer East
(2) DESIGN CAPACITY: 2.012 MGD
(3) CURRENT LOS:
Average daily flow (ADF) = 0.974 MGD
(4) LOS STANDARD:
100 gallons per capita per day (GCPD)
b. PROJECTED LOS (INDICATE YEAR) UNDER EXISTING
DESIGNATION:
1997 Projected ADF = 1.88 MGD
1997 Projected Design Capacity = 2.012 MGD
2010 Projected ADF = 2.76 MGD
2010 Projected Design Capacity = 2.75 MGD
c. PROJECTED LOS (INDICATE YEAR) UNDER PROPOSED
DESIGNATION:
1997 Projected ADF = 1.93 MGD
1997 Projected Design Capacity = 2.012 MGD
2010 Projected ADF = 2.81 MGD
2010 Projected Design Capacity = 2. 75 MGD
d. IMPROVEMENTS/EXPANSIONS ALREADY
PROGRAMMED OR NEEDED AS A RESULT OF
PROPOSED AMENDMENT:
The developer wil/ extend a forcemain from its existing
termination at Vista Willa Drive along State Road 434 to
the project site.
8
e. IDENTIFY THE OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES THAT
SUPPORT THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT:
Objective C, Policies " 7, 9, and 13
f. IS AMENDMENT TO THE SANITARY SEWER SUB-
ELEMENT NECESSARY AS A RESULT OF THE
PROPOSED AMENDMENT?
No.
3. DRAINAGE/STORMWATER:
a. FACILITIES SERVING THE SITE, CURRENT LOS, AND
LOS STANDARD:
(1) FACILITY:
Storm drainage will be provided on site in
accordance with City of Winter Springs and St.
Johns River Water Management District criteria.
(2) CURRENT LOSILOS STANDARD:
The City's Comprehensive Plan provides for
a stormwater system design for the 25-year,
24-hour duration storm event. Further,
water quality treatment shall be provided for
a volume equivalent to one-half inch of
depth over the site, consistent with Chapter
17-25, F.A. C.
b. PROJECTED LOS (INDICATE YEAR) UNDER EXISTING
DESIGNATION:
See 3.a(2) above.
c. PROJECTED LOS (INDICATE YEAR) UNDER PROPOSED
DESIGNATION:
See 3.a(2) above.
9
d. IMPROVEMENTS/EXPANSIONS ALREADY
PROGRAMMED OR NEEDED AS A RESULT OF
PROPOSED AMENDMENT:
Other than on site improvements, no expansion or
improvements are necessary.
e. IDENTIFY THE OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES THAT
SUPPORT THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT:
Goal 1, Objective B, Policies 1, 2, 3, and 4
Goal 2, Objective A, Policies 1, 2, and 3
Goal 2, Objective B, Policies 1 and 3
f. IS AMENDMENT TO THE DRAINAGE SUB-ELEMENT
NECESSARY AS A RESULT OF THE PROPOSED
AMENDMENT?
No.
4. SOLID WASTE:
a. FACILITY:
The City contracts with Industrial Waste Services
(IWS) who delivers to Seminole County's Osceola
Landfill.
b. DESIGN CAPACITY:
The landfill is expected to be operational and thus
have capacity through the year 2022.
c. CURRENT LOS:
The City's current level of service is 2.33 pounds
per capita per day (PCD).
d. LOS STANDARD:
Seminole County has adopted a level of service of
5.14 PCD.
10
e. PROJECTED LOS UNDER EXISTING DESIGNATION:
In 1997, the County projects an LOS of 3. 77 PCD,
rising to 4.58 PCD by 2010. The projected impact
of the existing designation is 565.5 pounds of
solid waste per day in 1997 (50 dwelling units x 3
persons per unit x 3.77 PCD). The 2010 figure is
687 pounds of solid waste per day (50 dwelling
units x 3 persons per unit x 4.58 PCD).
f. PROJECTED LOS UNDER PROPOSED DESIGNATION:
There would be no change in the projected LOS.
There would be a reduction in the projected impact
under the proposed designation. The projected
impact of the proposed designation is 1979.25
pounds of solid waste per day in 1997 (175
dwelling units x 3 persons per unit x 3.77 PCD).
The 2010 figure is 2404.50 pounds per day (175
dwelling units x 3 persons per unit x 4.58 PCD).
g. . IMPROVEMENTS ALREADY PROGRAMMED OR NEEDED
AS A RESULT OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT:
None.
h. IS AMENDMENT TO THE SOLID WASTE SUB-ELEMENT
NECESSARY AS A RESULT OF THE PROPOSED
AMENDMENT?
No.
F. COASTAL MANAGEMENT:
N/A.
G. CONSERVATION:
1. HABITAT ANALYSIS AS TO WHETHER THE SITE CONTAINS
HABITAT FOR SPECIES LISTED BY FEDERAL, STATE OR
LOCAL AGENCIES AS ENDANGERED, THREATENED OR
SPECIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN:
A report has been prepared by Breedlove, Dennis & Associates,
Inc. and attached to this application as Exhibit "C".
11
2. TYPE AND DEGREE OF DISTURBANCE TO THE NATURAL
FUNCTIONS OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE LANDS;
SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFY WETLANDS:
Any impacts will be in accordance with local, state and federal
guidelines.
3. THE EFFECT ON VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES:
The effect on vegetative communities will be analyzed as part
of an impact and mitigation analysis in accordance with local,
state and federal guidelines.
4. IDENTIFY THE OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES THAT SUPPORT
THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT:
Objective B, Policies 4, 5, and 6
Objective C, Policies 5a-f and 6
H. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE:
1. FACILITY: Northeast Region neighborhood parks.
2. CURRENT LOS:
There are no neighborhood parks within the immediate
area. The closest park is the 59 acre community park,
Central Winds Park, which is within approximately 3
miles of the site. There are also neighborhood parks
within the nearby Tuscawilla Planned Unit Development.
3. LOS STANDARD:
6.9 acres per 1000 population.
4. PROJECTED LOS UNDER EXISTING DESIGNATION:
For 1997 and 2010, there would be no change from the
current LOS.
5. PROJECTED LOS UNDER PROPOSED DESIGNATION:
See H.4. above.
12
6. IMPROVEMENTS ALREADY PROGRAMMED OR NEEDED AS A
RESULT OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT:
Improvements to the open space system needed as a
result of the proposed development will be created on-
site in accordance with the City's Code.
7. IDENTIFY THE OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES THAT SUPPORT
THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT:
Objectives D, E, F and H
8. IS AMENDMENT TO THE RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE
SUB-ELEMENT NECESSARY AS A RESULT OF THE PROPOSED
AMENDMENT?
No.
I. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION:
1. STATE THE IMPACTS AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE OF THE
PROPOSED AMENDMENT ON ADJACENT LOCAL
GOVERNMENTS:
The proposed amendment will have no impact on adjacent local
governments. It has previously been established by Seminole
County and by the City of Winter Springs that the proposed
development will be served by Winter Springs Utilities. The
City of Oviedo has no desire or capacity to serve the proposed
development.
2. LIST COMMENTS OR OBJECTIONS FROM ADJACENT LOCAL
GOVERNMENTS:
There have been no comments or objections from the City of
Oviedo. Seminole County has previously provided to the City a
letter dated November 9, 1995, a copy of which is included
within this application as Exhibit "D If.
3. IDENTIFY THE OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES THAT SUPPORT
THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT:
Objective A, Policies 2, 3, 4, 8
Objective C, Policy 1
Objective D
13
J. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS:
1. ANALYSIS AS TO WHETHER THE AMENDMENT IS BASED ON
THE ANNUAL MONITORING AND EVALUATION REVIEW OF
THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT:
The developer will extend a water line and a forcemain in order
to provide water and sewer service to the property. There are
no significant improvements to State Road 434 required by the
proposed amendment.
2. FISCAL IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT ON THE
CITY, IF ANY, ON PUBLIC FACILITIES AS IDENTIFIED IN
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ELEMENTS AND RELATIVE
PRIORITIES OF THOSE NEEDS:
The proposed amendment will provide additional water and
sewer users to the City, resulting in the payment of service
fees, connection and meter fees and utility revenue to the City.
Additionally, the City will benefit from the payment of real
property taxes by property owners. There will also be payment
of impact fees to the City.
3. IMPROVEMENTS ALREADY PROGRAMMED OR NEEDED AS A
RESULT OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT:
The Developer will provide the necessary capital
improvements.
4. IDENTIFY THE OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES THAT SUPPORT
THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT:
Objective C
5. IS AMENDMENT TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SUB-
ELEMENT NECESSARY AS A RESULT OF THE PROPOSED
AMENDMENT?
No.
14
K. VACANT LAND CHARACTER ANALYSIS IN ORDER TO DETERMINE
SUITABILITY FOR USE, INCLUDING:
All of the Property is vacant. Approximately 50 acres are
planned for development of single family detached residences.
The balance of the Property is wetlands and will become
conservation lands.
Attached hereto as Exhibit "c" is the report of Breedlove, Dennis &
Associates, Inc. which discusses soils, natural resources and other
matters.
A ttached hereto as Exhibit "E" is the Soils Map and the Flood Map.
The population projections relative to the proposed amendment are as
folio ws:
1995 = 0
2000 = 612
2005 = 612
L. 1992 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INCONSISTENCIES:
None.
\KBIBA TTLE\CHECKLST .CPA
15
UKC
~
,-:;=:::::::-..~~ ~
# I
~#
~
JCSSUP
~
~
--
~
~
---=:::
~
~.
I
~
:o.flIl; J,~I'
I :bo#.
I .....
I
I
I
:':t:tc:J,...,.
t. to
"
o
~g~M^P
"JG..1Oatr.l!>t..
. ,.....en fJI' LUc),~ .. t.tC'~ '. 1'0_""," '1 W:U'" ....tI '1 WI, "'-'Qt
D:lUo.oh. I\lIouJ... .......c "uo( ......I~'r u,o...a A' IlI..u....,
KOW A' 'I( 1I0lt1WtA.., rOllwU fJI W,,,,,, to Ihwo,. )t 'Gn,. "..c:( '1 tAU.
1JMIftU '''-'''', 'lUlU.\: .II.J.cr...... '(jURI It'U)"U' ....,'. ""OtIC 110( IltOItlllJ.r
Of ho Sl:UOoI '04 lU'A.I<( 01 )4.'.n n,,; "ilK( lLA_,,: ,,"0 _tar........ .....
.u.r.. O"""'lA... ...1-11......" or n.}, fUI..O.. "..", ~ Pt """"c..utN"
1tCo.,...(.I......... UtI'" .0( WIU.. kl.1....r. hOCI.. "'0.' ..., ,.-", ~.OC...Ilu....
...Q.....U-.....'U1( ..< 'lLlo_1; 'M: I" CCIU'UU: ..,.. U..,... II"f'." I.-n....
CIou....n C>>' U.lh tU\ IU" ,1.1..., ... .&. n..... tc..c..lC """"~"'In"", _. .....,,~
"......."'. L#' t4..... fur.u.u A u~ w:.........( L#' 1.1101'" lU"n'LoUI .......... ","oe
JOV 11!.A'fLIIIlr "lOuO rill: All!: (# IAlI "'.l( ICIIOVCl,... (l.flU( HlLU 01
~'~-':;':"..;~.t:'.Ct::.":'~..:~:: ~\..:,'.::':.'.,. ..":.::,~":,,, ~~ ~1...
\LIt.I"'-t......, ....low(; .. ...,.", tw uu.u 11.11 AHI A OoUr,Q .,.......~ u looI.u...
h'U',.' ........; .c....~ ..... ""'-'.........1'" au-. DC ..,,~ fS ,... n...", .-.c....w
... U.'IVII. MQJ or U'I'J,' fa. lIft....c ..u~ '" "1" IU",u... .(1., Of
(0..-......., W'''''a.-.,: 01' ... 0..-", co.c...... :...u.....'IlAu _........... Ulloo,,\ U ""..
"" -- " ,....u ..'NlIl.... II IW"" U"",,. Wr. ....""', ..... """"......11'"
. "'u.c: DC. .,,< ", ...... h_wI ....c.",c.... "......, -..t "" "',,"...' '.' .... -c
.,,-.. ... .,. at II., I. ~ '_'. .......,.. .....'" ,_ ~.... _ "-
..'"'b........'U...., ..c..1.~..4( _..0... ",\,'u' Lul. .. """'......., !If .Ot t. "".
Iou... ~ lea"... ""..,.... 011. .. 1lo1""H DI n.. r",. I. .. ...... _ "< w......
lI><( .." .01: -,.. 'f, &it' 'I,.o,Q u...... '. .."....., _ _'1 ",\,'u' ......... "''''''''
1- &.au". ....... .. ."~ ur ,."" Ill" '0.. 'u.t .., II., ..., .." .... .... ~11
':'.':_';' k:::-'::::':''':~',~. ".: .~_.:~.~,~:. :....,.';:.:..:'~.'!.:..:: :;~":.~"_
IUt. '0.. .-. -"C -.oe.., -.u.I.OI....,lMt Cr' I"'" .... 'h. ...........:;_
11.41', ,,',W',.' ''''''. ....., .... IOOcIlI 1ilIIC.I1..U...., ....." ...,"""', Uf .III..'
fll'. Iq .. .Cooofl Dol' ... ""'U ,.., DI lie .... ..... U 'I' II .... .,_........ If' ~ ..,.
IW..,.., 'I' Ill' 'AU tic..... .. ....,.. .,,._.. 1.ouJ _11I1 "",,,.,,,..,,, ,.c" _
"001111 ..".... IIC", "&10011: .... ,..., l-oC..... tI..-c., v .I,... ''''. to... "0..,.
0. Itc: tuu........., .... "e. ......... 'I' 01 "'C ......,,&...O.U 'I. .... .oC .........c....s, II' '"
II" ioUulO"AIt 'I' 01 .... 1(",000l lz '''-X ...... ~... """...,. ....". ....;:.c ,,,.
levl. U41(. " I\IIHNlIct Of ....... 'll I, I, .. "ca.., c..t nc (.-Jot h( U Il( ,....&toI.aU
II' 01 .0( 1oOoI1(..U ." U. DC: 'OVD(&1I '/4 Of ,_ 'lilt...... ": ~ ..... la.....
..",'JI" ~'U. #Ilu... "'I .... hll ...... A 001.......(1 UI M..... 11."'; ........,..11.....<
.....,......,...lC,....... 1LtJ... "'I":U' ..,.. '" tllI.....Cf Of l:too '11'; .'lOn 1Iuo, .....1'1'I
"',.'". "'''.'' ..........ex II dOll'ut. IQ.. '0o?I, c....f 10.1... LM,- CI .., _,..
In 01 ."". ""{Joo ": ......... ."'..,.,."" uu.u' Lall....o..o ..... ~'..I..t.. ..
0.",_" U' IIw lilt ,. .C uti 'I. U".f_ U' lo..u "'-(I...... ... ...,.'" "-#. _~
"''1,',," -'lit. ....Oto. ... tAu Uo(, 01 ,. --.'.AU tll ';I .",. '"',.... .....
DlU_Cf W '111.,. fli' ,. .0( ..~.t 0' ..""....,
\
\ \
\ \
\ .
\ .....-
\ 'l.
\ ~;
\
: : :.'.:\=1
~. 1""'\
\ .~
.. .\'11':
,.. 1'1""",
,. '''''"'
\
~ \
1 ~ : 'rJ~'Z~
r?, . '~..
\ \ . .. ....r I f' .
.~ \ . l'[
'i., \ "".~ .." ~.~;
". \ . 11':'01:10:.1.
- ~ J . '" .;..r · b ~ ..",....,..
-----L____________.______. L_-.i -l
.:::::::==-====--=--T----=--~. - -. -'--1 -=:J;t-;~~~/(]~~q:::=-- j -=-..:::::.--====:::JJUi.:lc..f~--==__=:::::::::=:::=::=__::::::
\ "..... '- "".,.. "1
\ c--- --~,.~,-? 1_ ~~... IiI _....
L_~ ''''U., (, ,-_.J.
:11,
I
lO"'CD, A_I
~
:c"f., 1,..,
,.... lNfD,...... It SG-ICU COwn. n.DlUII, NOlI (O>IlhlNO 'It.., 1GiIf' tIOIl( 04-
OJ..
tOl/e
"''''1 CO"UIVA'tGN
INrFHDfD 10 AtC01l0DA.f( .aCIICUUU"C usn Wlltt .acenlal'
lINt\( IAUll' IlU1lJlHc,U. P'\IIt1CI, "'''' II[ COUYlIlllb ..)
IIICur. UUS .AI UO'( UlDu, Srt.VICrs II(COllC "Y-'JIA.~lr.
1.-10 U,uI\lUlI f ou/to olC o. 1 DV/IO AC. If urnlS
.Ut 'lito S'(C'I'ICA.llY OW I ....cae lOIS.
I-I (OW Dff.n.rt 'fS.OtNIUl
~
~
l!
~
.1
<is!<l<l9f
."
U::
"=!
. .
1Il
,-
2:
"t-
o-::
~{
~..
U
U
...J
I' ~
_ .3
" -
!~
~ r
x
i
! &
~
l
u
u
f1i
. ~
~ i
i ~
.c
~
~
l-(
~
~
N
~
o
~
Q)
bJ)
C\j
C1.<
~
w 2.-
~ 2.-
0 0
a:: N
W ~
-l 2.-
l- I-
I- Vl
<
en x
w
mer-
1- . 1000'
mICe,.),
7-157
lilf"""-
~
~
~~-----~ ~
#' I
I
::--.- ~ :
~ ----""'''0..J I
~ I
~I 1
~- I
~ I
--, 1
~ I I
--/. I I
f ___ I
I f I
I, I
I c~~J.n:" I I RlJR""'-lO':W"'t'!I'.~n~1
f I I
: ': :
\ \. i ~..-.._.-_._..------:._.-.------._..__.-..-._--.._..-.--.-..--..---.---..---.T---------
. ~ ! i
\.. i i
\ \ ! !
' '. j I
\~ I
\ ~ !
' \ 'UaURUH [l1AtU ",
\ C""",.OV[D D[C(UIU IJ. 1114)
\ 1
\ \ !
\ " I
\ :
\ 1
\ '. 1
\ ,
\ \ 1
' \ !
\ .,..-.-..-..~..-..-..----..-..-..-..-..-.-.-..-..-..--..-..-"-", 1 ~-
1
\ "",... j I III
'\ ! :"-"-"-"-j l'~
~ i ii"
' '. I I
- - - - - - - - -\- - - -- -- -- - - - -- - - - - - - - - -- - - - -- - - -. - -- -L..-..-L---___..L______-L.
- .------~I:=..------------"-,.....,.-SJA,t .O^" U, ________________ _ _ _
-, - - - '---, -----r' '--l---~;';;;;.;;.----,-. _-,-___.___________ _,.___:==._==-:-::.:..-::::::::
\ 'I I I I I
I __..1 -'CR1CVllVll..... I L_, 1 fir
\ r-' r--------.::rZ,;._:;;J '--' L~11 ~rJI~ffr Ri.~iC[:n1.;l. ,I:
' I ~II
L RL'Il.....-IU.:C~':::mJ..,m" I ,
---, \ r-------'
in: " :
I I I
LAKC
JCSSUp
RlJn.....-,o
';l.
~
F
~
e.
7
~
'i.
..
IlL.....\._1 o..'c'~"'[ll\I...1l':'t1
.\-
..... ... .
A~na(
""..........
LDW' .(."n
U'OhllW.
luu.&...,.
,VIVI...,.
('UIU
KItwf"l'XW I HI4m lA.nl),
IifTOfcn 10 ACtOWOQ,U( -"-'Mn.c VI(I ...,.. J.cnslOlrT
s..ou: ,.u...., ~U"lII(u. OGIIIC'" ...., II( f;DwW'l_1I1 I.
ttOtIl "". '" ~.I( W&,IJf u.'I'Q'. IlI:CDW. ""~t.
..,......, l...UaI "" 'UrClM4l'101l (0ItIII-. 01 honm..
..Il\.t.,.o .u.e 'UlOe "'0..( un.
KA.A1olUW 1.1 ... J.. fN/~
t&.u.w.M I fIIJ/II AC 01 1 PI/" o\C, . \#Mil AJ1( IIlIa
SI(c.lC.I.lLl o.lI t 4C&( lOU.
IiIoUaM.l I III/Al:
~
~
l(
u
:1
<J<J<l<J<Jt.
.
~1l B
~~ fj
1I1
>- ~~
~
~f
~
Z"
0 j
u 2
.-\ " d
c
u~
. ~
u5
n
j i
p ~
J v N
~
E-! 0
H N
~
~ Q)
bf.
C<j
~ ~
:t r.
. ACCO<<DIHC 10 Tlfr SC\ltHOlr COUHTY CO.."IOf{lItrtt rUM rv'Ul{
wo un LLyo SUJU - )010.
NOtt, SIft tsl(QJ LOC.lUO IN tHt WfICN'.\ IIYtIlI 'IDuenow AU.....
w
VI
W :J
l:) 0
0 Z
0: j
W
...J l:)
I- Z
I-
<{ ?-
m VI
X
W
I- .. '000'
"0 Cc ...0.
7457
"tiift
0' 1
~
~
--
\
\
\ \
... \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
. \
\ ,
\ . \
\ .
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
...
~ \
~r- \
~ \
~c; \
.~ \
";. \
~ \
\
\
--,-
\
\
\
\
1- -,
~
~
UK[ J[HU'
&A ITlCRIDCC SII (
~
~
----------.---..--------
-------"AI[ "OAO .J. ______________
-----------"'=:=-=-::::~=.:;:;lrulUnc .-------
c IMI( At; I'U fur nUhlnU (OUIIIY ru Va(
1.""11: CUlevUI"," JOIO ruu).
CU"[H' Lo.f. . 1J.1" (LO.f, _, e....'
(IHe DCSICN ,""',1. 'tOluur . ...Uo Lo.t. r )
ru","C LO.s. e'CA. 7,000) AS A J UNC HellOIl
. ".n, LO.S. Ii'
-'L!kIW.lY_M.AP.
JCY!:LI1UUooCLCWu.LsWIMROL;
.\
<i<J<i<isI
.
B
!j
r.
U
~j
..~
'"
>-
7-
-{~
>-&
sf
Vl:..
/:"
U
U
.
.
; a
..J::
u:::
~
u~
~
r ~
1 .
~ !
H
L
fQ
t-c
~
~
~
~
.. . :
u .
. .
. I. -
~
. .. !
r :.
w
lJ m
0
a:: !::
m
41 J:
..J X
I-
f- W
<
m
,- . lono'
;;uml:(J.-
7457
,:.,,----
!_~!_'
V.L' .LoJ' ~v
95144~10.1
ANALYSIS OF THE POTENTIAL
FOR OCCURRENCE OF THREATENED
AND ENDANGERED SPECIES AND
SPECIES OF SPEC.I.AL CONCERN
ON THE BATTLE RIDGE
PROJECT SITE
Submitted to:
Mr. James W. Allen, Jr.
President
Battle Ridge Companies of Florida, Inc.
4221 Maine Avenue
P.O. Box 1118
Eaton Park, Florida 33840-1118
TEL: (813) 667-1115
FAX: (813) 667-1937
January 15, 1996
Submitted by:
Patrick E. Miller, B.S.
Associate Scientist II
[IDffi&~TI
W. Michael Dennis, Ph.D.
Vice President
EXHIBIT "e"
TABLE OF CONTENTS
UST OF FIGURES .................................................. 11
UST OF TABLES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. III
1.0 INTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.0 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 3
3.0 THREATENED, ENDANGERED, AND SPECIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN.... 7
3.1 Protected Species . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " 7
3.2 Wildlife. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 11
4.0 CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 14
APPENDIX PROTECIEDPlANTSANDANIMALS WITH POTENTIAL FOR
OCCURRENCE ON THE BATrLE RIDGE PROJECT SITE,
SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA
95144\ Rt; I'ORTS\ANAL ysrs.R.PT
1
vo&.' .LV' ..,V
,,',' .'
.''':. ".~i..~~:.,<.:~..{~t~.~i.~..:!~~~tl~~1~~ ,.., ; in. "~~I':" ;y7. ,~~{~~~ffi~;J.~fAty t / ~ .~1~/5_
...!. .,. JI,.~;,~~~t!.f.~~~!.. ~.ti".'"'''' \r",,\.,~ ~\ ~I 1.1;~' Ul'~rl ;^f\oV! \ . vfl- ~,r I
. :. ,..';'(' ',:::' ~"\~~;~t\:':~~~';$.~\~?\~A~" ~i ~'iI~1t~I~~t ;i:'~. 1..::\:;'.l~\.~;~~'~;'I:' '~J.~~'~' ~~~.,.. .
,\;'.'!;"',..i'). ':""1:,.:;i;,.,.,~.~.,:.~.,.1:. '''''.'Jf.~",,"rl!;'''~''~1~ ,i~~:}:i::";'\';'" U .. ....V ~.
:..,." \."'1.:'1 ........t'....,..t...ji1;,~t;tf.~lI~~f.~.;~;..JI.'...l" ).....,);;tJS'.t:' ~ .10..- -~ OlJ~ 01
'.'E..',,' :.~' ;'~;:I~;);,!),J,"~'J,':";J;"F'~S."'~.'I~~...t"'~~'\Q.:t'r: ;.1,:, ,I. ~,l'% I '_." ~ =-. ~"'''-ng.'~~" .. . ~ ~ I
.. . ,.~... "__,,., . .t...,r.\.........~ ,.,," ',' I:;!,. _ - - U '1 "
.~:: ,.',..:.'~ ":",~,;<,'J~"",,,,'~/.I.':.,::,{~!.~r.~~.:Jr'Ii:--"o!~' . ..' . _.....- ....... ,.<; ~\ 11: 1
",,'. . '-: :" .'-. .'~"'I"I:'~ W\~l.R./:'Jo'I.i....;~~)' ~:..:.~.":~...~\- :..' ~~............. '. . 'I ./1
i; . , . ;......, ',:. . ~'{I'/..../" ~ ''i\'''t}..I'ii\^'i~''~;;~0.'';;V'!' . ....... -- ... - - --... - i"..... I ~ I
," ," ::.'1 !t;;.'\~.!(.~~~t-'\.';"'.'.;1f"~'!~la';'''~'''C.''''~''-'''''' ~...., ~""'........_........ -.. Q /. . ""
',!',:"" ......... ~\:. ..' '!~~~~'.lti fK;i'l,~:~\,,'~"f..;i~ - ~"".......-..... --:. .:;... ....... - -. ",--,.., · ~(
'r" ..... ..'J. '. .~.,~, '\f'lr~l-~ ~ .......... _... - ..... ~ ~ ~ I
~f;.,. a..' ~-~"'?)." ~..,~~~:;-::~~~~r~~:~.::::~"":') \ ., f, /\\
. \~ ......-.~ ~-:..~....-.....~:... -...- -~......~........... -..\ J' :
. . ~~S:Y ... -~..... -_ .=a- ~-- ...... -- "'!Ir' - ........- (1 . I I
J _. _ ~ _ - ...... ....... - -- - .... i
. .:.. ... .........._~..._...... _...... __ ..........._...... QIG_ -
.1 ~ \= c / RI:J
~O 0~ . :." ~l"
__~ . . r---.. .
,. r . , ---... ... ,
.~.' . . D - .
. ", ~i:\' . ",."",'L,~. · (~ )' "
~3f) -J ! n l ~ .' ,~ .. \]::."".... :~ (:?' :1 ; ~
::-_. " ~ --!lo-"~ '\ 17!( ~ I /" '\\. I ~-_.- ~ :".
...... ~. !~~ :. F"ie~ / a'" l~ ~ .' ")
"'\ ~ ~ ~ . I!( I I ~~,' I. ~ 1\ ofr: ~ , _' (=cc'\\
'sEA BlrARD .... _ I I I 1 . '-' " , b
~ I 0 II .... n" n ..........
--- "? \ ~ ~ '.Ia. IL. ~:.':.~ ... ~. . ., ...-2~ ...... ,}
,\ /~+~- ;z- ~~ .,.., - - - ~- . "" . ...... . --.
~ ,\:r~~'" ~.;~.......,~~~~ \ \i R ~~~tt~~~~",:: ,~~
~ ))/ .f- ~~,' \. ~::::\ I ~.~ :. ~:-.
, " ". '~lll") ~~.A ". . ~\" ) :'.i ( I (..:.: .? V ~ ~ ~
o 18~"'" 0 - ~~ .. :- 't. '~ r- ~ \r:f".I l' '- ~~lf~~~. e.'
"v . [,.;;. "...~.~ ./. ' I r;. r-..." : '/ /. .~. ~~. Clll . L k
'. I ) ~..d7.: 1 ~ ~ ~ -....~.._~..~ ' . roo.") -:~...:.'. ~ ~~r . Ie
~. :' q.J' ... _ / ........ .._.: '~~~~.. ( -.; .'4.'\ ~C"'H
. -.. '-'~-J~ J. ~ .f ' /75-:; "-J.. . : r ~ ~ I/;,?' r ~c ~~
i s ~ t(V; " \--:t- - ~;:'5= ~# /"' a:: ~; \. ~%.~t~~ ~~
\~ pr.g ) j '- ~ '! 17- iC_r{-"-~r ,.,:..~. ..._1T....D~ D '\ . v(. \ ~ g~. r~ . :. ~~. ~~
~:JS 1\))': i:' '" ,.-.....[~ Il' II f. ( . . ~ . .1.. .J. ,..;:~ . f'" '.i :~'.=: ~
I . . _ . ' . -'.. :- --
, i... .- -: 11- \1 ........ . . ~: I
, . "'. 1 - ,,,.,- ~ ~!Hi N! ~ "f'~ R'l.~ ,.' ' .:.. .:9:;0'. '1~~:::.,
o (,:' (~ ~ If{'' . 'i' 'ffi1Il:<, ~~iIr/ ;-- . ~~'~_'\Y hl.tc'
~:._ J ~q \" u' ';( I ~ :.::~ ~:.:~ ~:,)J :0 V
.___ -:~....~' ____ J .. __.1 ~ I Iv 11 II ~ ~ .I~ ~ovi ldo ( 1
-::~:. ~ ;;;:\-H\~ i'~~Jl' ~'..~~\I\~~\JI T
-c::I:,: tJ~~3~ .-ch~\fi\(t~ *'-' c\:.^. .~~~~~ N\
~ ~ / !".. . JI>..... ."~" ,"Z': e:::: -71"( 1'~'S~lloO ~~,i~.'. i ~ .~~f:
. ': ~ IIlo... _ _."'0. 1 . ~ ~~'. llQtfr o~~_
')" ....+ I . ~ - ~ . rn . \ i,. n 1i:N ~ - t ...
~ (~l;,! /' \~ . :...~;. .t< \ c;!. ~ ---..:"f-lt~"--:~::' ~
I~. c=p ';.-1(....~. SCALE ,.. = 21
"
1&
. .'
U.S.G.S. OVIEDO. fL 1956 XREf'$: BELIWAY.DWG
PHOTOREVISED 1980. PROPERrf.DWG
ROAD8Uf.DWC
BT"\ ^ BREEDLOVE, DENNIS 95144-10.1 / 8ATiU
~n..t ASSOCIATES, INC. 1":'12-1996 / CST-Ii
4301 Metric Dr, Winter Pork, FL. .32792 (407)677-1882 Fox: f
FIGURE 1.0-1. LOCATION MAP OF THE 297-ACRE BATTLE RIDGE PROJECT SITE.
SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA.
:.. ..., (SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 21 S., RANGE 31 L)
2.0 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS
The 297.:!:.-acre site is currently c.;omprised of upland communities consisting of ml::sic hammocks,
improved pastures, abandoned fields, and wetlands consisting of mixed forested wedands and hydric
hammocks. Woods roads, ditches, and a borrow pit occur within the fores'ted portions of the site.
Evidence of past logging activity is present.
SoiLc;
Soil mapping units which occur within the site include Basinger, Samsula, and Hontoon soils-
depressional (10), Basinger and Smyrna fine sands-depressional (11), and Myakka and Eaugallie
fine sands (20), according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service Survey
of Seminole County. Myakka and Eaugallie fine sand are considered non-hydric., the remainder of
the soils are considered hydric. The topography for the project site ranges from 5 to 25 feet in
elevation.
Ve2etation Descriptions
Tract A
Tract A (Figure 2.0-1) contains abandoned fields located in the southeast corner of the property.
This area contains scattered orange (Citrus sp.) trees, laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), and scrub live
oaks (Quercus geminata). The groundcover includes dog fennel (Eupatorium capillifoLium),
broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus), begger-ticks (BideJu alba), and field grasses. Evidence of some
dumping of debris on these areas is present.
9S ]44\REI'ORTS\ANAL YSIS.RPT
3
Ttl
_._---------_.__._-~
----------------------------. 1
1-.----------- . \
Tract C
f
N
i
o
.
\
,
~ \
,
,
\ \
'a '
y ,
~ \
~ '
"I< ,
~ \
"!L
~
,
\
Tract D
Tract
_.
/
,
,
--- - -~. -- ---..-----------------.. - - ..--
lRANSECTS
S.R. 419
600'
.
seAl! ,. = 600' ,
XREFS: BELTWAY.OWG, ROADBUF.DWG
PROPERTY.OWG .
.,.. '- .....-)
:.....~-:"':';..:..~
_..~
\
n
1~ rs
11
T7
T4A
f4
Tract A
BD~A BREEDLOVE, DENNIS 95144-10.1 I BATTLLOWG
na: ASSOCIATES, INC. 1-19-96 I CBT-!p
4.301 Metric Dr. Wintet Pork, fl. 32792 (407)677-1BB2 fox:657-7QOB
GOPHER TORTOISE CENSUS TRANSECTS WITHIN THE BATTLE RIDGE PROJECT SITE. SEMINOLE COUNTY. FLORIDA.
FIGURE 2.0-1.
'"t.:.I - - . . .,'--
Tract B
The southeastern portion ofthe property (Figure 2.0-1) is an upland mesic oak (Quercus sp.)-palm
hammock community dominated in the canopy by live oak (Quercus virginiana), laurel oak, and
water oak (Quercus nigra). The subcanopy consist of cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), sweetgum
(Liquidambar styraciflua), southern magnolia (MagnoJiagrandiflora), and water oak. The shrub layer
is represented by saw palmetto (Serenoa repens), cabbage palm, and American beautyberry
(Callicarpa americana). The groundcover found in this area includes bracken fern (Pteridium
aquilinum), feHerbush (Lyonia lucida), cinnamon fern (Osmunda cinnamomea), greenbrier (Smilax
hona-nox), grape (Vids sp.), Boston fern (Nephro/epi!J exaltata), goldenrod (Euthamia sp.), Panicum
sp., gallberry (flex glabra), wire grass (Aristida stricta), and blue maidencane (Amphicarpum
muhlenbergianum ).
Tract C
The northeast comer of the property (Figure 2.0-1) is an improved pasture with livestock currently
occupying the area. The overstory includes live oak, cabbage palm, southern red maple (Acer
rubrum), and sweetgum. The groundcover dominating Tract C is dog fennel, coinwort (Centella-
asiatica), field grasses, flat sedge (Cyperus sp.), greenbrier (Smilax sp.), Caesar-weed (Urena lobata),
blackberry and (Rubus sp.). The area is intersected by ditches running north-south and east-west.
Tract D
The majority of this site (Figure 2.0-1) is composed of a mixed forested wetlands and hammock
wetlands system which includes cypress (Taxodium sp.), cabbage palm, laurel oak, water oak, black
gum (Nyssa sy[vatica var. biflora), southern red maple, and loblolly bay (Gordonia Iasianthus) in the
overs tory and cabbage palm, buttonbush (Cephalanthus o ccidentalis), and ironwood (Carpinus
9$IM\REJ>OIlTS\AAAI. YSlS. RoPT
5
caroliniana) in the shrub layer. The groundcover is dominated by netted chain-fern (Woodwardia
areolata), cinnamon fern, green arum (Peltandra virginica), Boston fern, swamp fern (Bled1l1um
serrulatum), and woodsgrass (Oplismenus setarius). Soils are saturated to the surface and numerous
indications of sudace ponding. Soils have several inches of mucky texture.
95144\REPORTS\i\NAL ysrs.RPT
6
3.0 THREATENED, ENDANGERED, AND SPECIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN
BOA conducted an analysis of the potential for T&E species occurrence on the project site during
December 1995. A 20% wildlife survey was also conducted for the presence of gopher tortoise
(Gopherus polyphemus) as well as other T &E species, utilizing the guidelines set forth by the Florida
Game & Fresh Water Fish Commission (FGFWFC) (Figure 2.0-1).
3.1 . Protected Species
The FGFWFC criteria (Cox, er. al, 1987) were applied to conduct surveys of gopher tortoise, a
species listed as an SSC, on the Battle Ridge project site. Transects established for gopher tortoises
were also carefully searched for signs of other listed species with potential for occurrence on the
site.
Approximately 20% of the upland vegetation cover types on-site were quantitatively censused.
Transects were placed systematically throughout the entire upland area (Table 3.1-1). The uplands
identified during the census were classified as low potential for gopher tortoise habitation, based
on vegetation structure, soil characteristics, and prior disturbance.
The wildlife survey and gopher tortoise census indicates that the project site does not provide
essential habitat for any federally- or state-listed T&E species. Likewise, there are no known
occurrences of any T &E plant species On the project site.
9S144\REPORTS\ANAL YSIS.RPT
7
v_.__.__ -....... ---
., .,
::/1
Table 3.1-1 Results 01 the Gopher Tortoise Census Conducted in December 1995 on the
Battle Ridge Project SIte, Seminole County, Florida.
u, ~~~~,~t~J(, ",: ;:,~~.::u.",: :,~~~~;;;\\::~:::),\:(~~~~~~~;~:\:\:
T-1
T-2
T-3
T-4
T-4A
T-5
T-6
T-7
T-8
T-9
T-10
T-ll
T-12
T-13
625 0.66 0
600 0.63 0
625 0.66 0
445 0.45 0
300 0.32 0
720 0.76 0
650 0.69 0
600 0.63 0
712 0.75 0
964 1.02 0
1,010 1.07 0
340 0.36 0
1,150 1.21 0
1,150 1.21 0
9S144\RfroR1'S\I\NI\L YSlS.311
A list of protected specIes, as published by the fGI:WfC "Official List of Endangered and
Potentially Endangered Flora and Fauna of Florida" dated June 1, 1994, was reviewed. Potential
federally-listed T&E species for the Battle Ridge project site in Seminole County are provided in
the Appendix. The site does not provide critical habitat for any of these plant or animal species,
based on the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service "Threatened Species of the Southeast United States" (The
Red Book) dated January 1992.
There are four bald eagle (Ha/iaeems I. leucocephalus) nests in proximity to the Battle Ridge
property according to Mr. John White of FGFWFC as of January 2, 1995 (Figure 3.1-1).
Nest No. SE31 is located just south of the southwest corner of the property at the
intersection of County Road 419 and the GreeneWay (State Road 417). Year 1993 was the
last year in which young were produced. This bald eagle nest is located in Section 9,
Township 21 South, and Range 31 East.
Nest No. SE04 is called the Tuscawilla Eagle Nest located in Section 9, Township 21 South,
and Range 31 East. The nest's last production was in ,1993. The nest is approximately 2,700
feet southwest of the property.
Nest No. SE18 is just east of the property. It produced three young in 1995 and at times
the eggs are removed for relocation. The nest is approximately 3,300 feet southwest of the
project site in Section 3, Township 21 South and Range 31 East.
95144\REPORTS\ANAL YSlS.RPT
9
~r" < ; , . ~.ml~t""',\." (. .' .',. .. (..I:\:~'.. . " I J'. . : ,., .,,"I^:.:::,.,...lit, ...::'l~II,'..vM~- I~;'., "j" .>r.n~~".::;~ tJ: '. "OJ "'.., c.
r.~'. ~ ~~~~~t~t-~>~}1;~:r..': ';'::':l<fi'~":: ":,:.~,,:~;,:},~~~~~:~~,, -.". '(llt. ~tlii~,. ',"?-,~~~~"'~..,:~;r' ~ L1..: X
~iL~ . 01:: t;~~ 1~:.V;;.ci':~~t'1'''-> . 1"""'1' ,~~< :-'1"'~':"""" .....I:".~;~::I.;~t~~ :'~'. tr~~,rl.r\":f~~~1.~t~1. .tx,.r\-',' t/!' . . .\
11'1-::.'.' ~ ", "'-~-:="'>-:i:l.~. .~t '6:'1;.....:::':;:: :. :: .:., ~ ' ~ I ~"'l' N'" ',:"0:- ~:\ "i:.I~c;\'r. .~I~I) ..t.d~(j '/ ~ 1~\~),~'" /__
;~:~,~1 ~.~: t.;tiI-~~~~I~e~~'.l>~~1'~ :-.;..... .' .., <. ~ ......,~,..'~:.,,~..dMi,~~1 '7!<.I.~:~'I~~~~'~~':~""~~'I!l' ,....._ ,,:
c.~..;~f\.. ~'?L; ~~.;XI:~~'1 ...~,r~tt'C' ~~ r.....l::r~..~ .' ,'; :. : :o-.,.~ '.'.1' .1.I~t::IIo'J.Jr~ ~'w""'~~~"_~I~~1;i1).'{'" '~:c1)!' U t
Ii ~(:~<~ ':.,~ ' ~, '~';.'~'~;f;r;"I~?r!~~/~ ", ", : ,,' ~.,. .. '.' '. ':" i. ~';~ "~;;II'~~v""M;;,~lli~':"~iWi(::rn~;~I:~(~~~l~l;-f.1P~~:v~o' b M " --'"' ~'5 '
I, I~;.t~~ : . "~' ~lTc:~~......"nt'~I...frt~~''''''.1 .:l.~ , , l,', :t i, ':_"""';~-r'\~~....!i1,:.~:t~~~"1 ~N '0: ',1.,' prr ~.. j
~!:'J~I '..l" . ';.. ); 11;~';':~'" ;'~~ri'~' "s;.,,\-;.," ,:'. .:.,..'.;..' l:,it:," . ::,1:1\,;,.1 ~(~~.:':O.)W~. '!!~::Jt, *'" / . " V' . i' ,I::
~j~\J .if) ~ "\~$~ :r:~ ,t't....r~......,-::.::)'..;,.. :," ," ; '!:~~;-'~-J;~i'I,;\"::('jll~t"J\'~lfirrt.4 - a' 07 ~. .._ '. ,f,
I'!';G"~" . .".~.~ ...,;. '" .,li""":"~"i"...N.~1 ~ ....-- 0 ~ II ,~- r',
~::;:'..-li-' :~ I~.,g~\",~,~,..,:;;: ...., ',' .' ..'.:,.:',l,,~'~:"'\~:J:~',t~~\I.i;~\':' -. 1-' -' ~~='11 .. . n . ':1'
j!lfi!! t,itf?j'" 'II' .~,..;. ...J....,.',::;.;P1Iu'. ....,;"... -- ";::'I"'~", ng;.;1\ II, '.'
I'~!fu/'l,l "l",~; ''I.~_,.:t!''':.,o;: ;..:....Q:~'~I.,...I. .......~...-............. . /. II:' , ,,"
~~i~. '.. ,i,'1~ ....Jt~ ~~:~";:~P'lIu~'.",'" .... --............. - -- --~ ~.:L : i. . '. , .
~'r,~' ',':! :t-;~r';~":~~"r' "'-'.;;..' ~ -r, .- .......~ ---.... _' !:? " n ~~. I
:',. .' jj;" -~~__...~ 4:--&_~ ll-' . - II ~ '
~\)i;':;:' Xl I ,~. %ii !F_-:.t:fi):::~I-:.2-1::/ \ . - i ) , i
j::::i. ' .sp", ~ J ~ f:.~i:=-::"';--~~ ~:~,~'~-I n J 000. .. II ,/ ~ .,
I~ - ~o~~. =-==_~;'_~~~~~~~~_i~~' 11 ~~. I! !
. ~ ~---- ~~...--- ----- -.- ~-_.. ~ " i ~
',' '- --... ~ -~ - - --.--""':=.-. - ..
; - '. ~~:2";~'Siit~.- II _ ~ . /"'-- ,~ .
:( . ( /' ~ . ~ ~ --:-4--"';-_';'~-' . D- ~ .. ~ .-=- \
'1'X//h' ~ ~ ,: '".:~1:1
~ . ,.... ~ '''- ~r/"'" /T -.- (~ /6 i
. ~ r.. r : ~.~P:: .~t!tf . rl~~ 1'":'\ .,. ~ \ 'Y</AhI h . ~\.-
~~ ..;:- ~;: >'" '~I'd~ D -- i\J:::~ 'i~ -.If r;r - r;.! /[
\EAj -- I/, {"K~ :r ~ ~\SJ1'ra "'0 )\~~ .;- -(:J.l\S~18 i
.>:.. l' '1'0, -- ~ I f" I
B Rl-A -., : :.. K . /j 1\ ..,,04 L ( . .. "...~ . ~
---L \.:::j . ~~: ___ .. -l'- _ ____._ r __2~ _ _, Q "- ____.,
~~ -~ . . Il~Y:'" ...... ...
~ . .A ). : ~c:: ~ ~~ ~ '. ~ :~ (': - ~ ~ L~' J;' ,
4 ..... ~- I {c:l ~ "'. -: 1'.\ ';::::r-... \: '.. -'~~~ \.,/~,~
OJ' ~ h~~' \<=0 f""' ~ rr:~",,~~ .~~~~t:d~~,~>;, >: ..
" :..,;.Jq'..;~, _~ ~ ~"==-"'1[;-"'...... "", IJ )(,~Y(I';fr<:-' -. ~ ~'14\}' ~~!,:..
<::.: ~:'..:::~iL .i~ ~ . - (~~~: ~J; ~~c. ~~
rSpr t;>.. 1(: " ~~-~-"r-+~ ~I :: ~ ~f(~\ '7r:~.~::~i/J Lot-.~,
\) "~f:' ,..-....~ 1 '(' I.'. :~~r~, '..i,) \'" ~..~. '~'i~.~~:.~~i~,~.:_-
J9 \ ~. [ J ,( . ~ _' '. r~ " '.' ~~;-
\". I ___ """-...:... I~p ... . . ... . _ ~ : .~~.
-~ J ~ ~""'- H~~lt G r # '" K;.' . . . . ~ (
" '\ - . \.. ': - .=, :.;.. ".1,' ~~'I " ",:,' ~: -:.:';7] '-:...~;-. : . ~ ,
. ~. SC('(' . "\i:P .. ... . .-)t
l,: ~J~ Jl:~ .\f.5? i t\... . :. . :tt!~ ~~. . 7 :.' .' ;'. t1~:. -"~~ ~
): ) ~ , \'. . . ~.:~ ~ . '-./ I 1
_~..Err::. ~Ill') \~ ~ v J I;' It 0.~ "(~ '~Ovi~do C. f
---- ~:~:~-- 1~~~.~~~R'8If}):r ~'~~"'\ \J\~'-4B '0)1 r
/ :'; ~ ch ~ 'J ."(/Y~ 0 '. t'r ^) .j':.2~ (
<::::l . ~: \ ,.,.~q j. ~ I- . . ... ~~
~ ) ::., '\ \ . i <> . .qot'!" - I !.~ (J ~~. ~a ~ ~ . \ .:0 . '='<,
.~ .:! ~) - @-~ -:--... . l' .. , .\\10' { w-=-- ;:,. '-'... - : ~
,3" 7!1:\ :'r'Jll}#. I, ~1 II. ~. r-.. I \~J- :S r:.~ <J(... t -=
R/3'
o
o 2000'
. .
SCALE 1" = 2000'
U.S.G.S. OVIEDO. F'L 1956 XREFS: BELlWA'l'.OWG
PHOTOREVISEO 1980. PROPERTY.OWG
ROA08UF'.OWG
BDlA BREEDLOVE, DENNIS 95144-10.1 /8ATTLE.OWG
n~ ASSOCIATES. INC. 1-15-1996 / C8T-lp
4301 Metric Or. Winter Pork, FL. 32792 (407)677-1882 Fox: 657-7001
FIGURE 3.1-1. BALD EAGLES' NEST LOCATIONS WITH THE PRIMARY ZONE OF 750 FEET
AND AN ASSUMED SECONDARY ZONE OF 1,500 FEET UNTIL VERIFIED ON
A NEST -BY-NEST BASIS BY FGFWFC AND usrws, SEMINOLE COUNTY.
FLORIDA.
v...' ...v' v\J ...'.. v"t
~"':Iv, UV' ,uvv
Nest No. SE45 is tocated in Section 33, Township 20 South, and Range 31 East. The nest
is actively producing one young in 1995. It is approximately 3,500 to 4,000 feet from the
southeast portion of the property.
The bald eagles undoubtedly feed along Lake Jesup. The possible development of the southeast
portion of the Battle Ridge site is outside the primary (750 feet) and secondary (1,500 feet)
management zones., and should not affect this species. The bald eagle nests are currently located
within and adjacent to urban development and major transportation corridors.
Based on the T&E survey of the site and the known habitat preferences of the T&E species that
are in the area, four wildlife species and one plant species were observed to feed or rest on the
project site. The site, however, is not critical hahitat for these species, which use a variety of
habitats in this portion of Seminole County. The listed wildlife species include American alligator
(Alligator mississippiernis), white ibis (Eudocirnu.9 albus), and wood stork (Mycteria americana). The
listed plant species is needle palm (Rhapidophyllum hystrix). All of these are wetland species which
would use or be found in the wetland forests adjacent to Lake J esup.
3.2 Wlldlife
Wildlife observations were made during the site reconnaissances of the Battle Ridge property (Table
3.2-1).
?Sl44\lU!PORTS\ANAJ.. 'tSJS.lU'T
11
V.' ..." vv .... vV
......v, "'V' IVVV
Table 3.2-1 Wildlife Observed on the Battle Ridge Project Site, Seminole County, Florida.
... . -," . . ~ ~.. ,,~'..'. , .: " A.. , ,:.. ,{ ~::';:::HAb~i::;':':': >: ~q~~~~~~~:;~ ~:;;'~~'Ji~$.~~~~st1i~~ri~:~1
.....~~~;:'i '~ '. ',. ." '" ,. A"-" ...' '. ..;
;:$l.tiJ1c: r~ram~; .' . '.. , .
:,::.:f:;:~~::: .~.:,: ::, < ::.~; . ." ...
/: :: ~ :~ ,::;. : ; ::: :,:~:~: .~. ~::::: :.~. A .
. ......,. .:....: '..."..,..... " ":.~ c , ;.~:.;.:: ::.:' ::~:: /: ::~::: ~ :3.~:'~:~:';;~~ ~,:.: ~~>::>:::.'.~:;:. ~;::
....... ' ;.;.. :'.:><",':' .....
.;, ., '. . '.' : ...,....,. ~.:..:;:',. ,..:~;:.:'T .:'::':'~:/:;'~:~'~: ';'.. ~ ~': ~~:~~'~:4'~;:'~': ;':~:.:"-'~_::
;: :'. ';'::"""';.;..: '; . ;. . ::'~: ,.a:sRWS,... ., :F:GEWE ,. ,.
.. . .. . ." .. . '.: .. ,o., .,.! ...... ~-l..:,..' ...;, '" ..-.:. " .. .: to1'-'
Wildlife
wood stork Mycteria Mixed Sighted E' E
americana wetland
system
great blue Ardea herodias Mixed Sighted - -
heron wetland
system
white ibis Eudocimus Improved Sighted - SSC4
aIbus pasture
armad.i11o Dasypus Improved Burrow - -
novemcinctus pasture, field,
and mesic
hammock
gray squirrel Sciurus Mesic Audible - -
carolinensis hammock
opossum Didelphis Abandoned Sighted - -
marsupia/is fields
barred owl Srrix varia Mesic Sighted - -
hammock
white-tailed Odocoileus Mixed Feces - -
deer virginian us wetland
system
black vulture Coragyps atratus Mesic Sighted - -
hammock
red-bellied M e1anerpes Mixed Sighted - -
woodpecker carolinus wetland
system
American Turdus Mesic Sighted - -
robin migrarorius hammock I
ditch
blue jay Cyanocitta Mesic Sighted - -
cristata hammock
!l5lA4\REPORTS\AN^L. YSIS.321
Table 3.2-1 Continued.
;.' " ~~:~~tU1g.:~~~\ ,,:.-,.',: ';' ,''-. . '.69~k~~;!~ ~ ti ~~ ~#~s~~~::st~;~i~~/E
.. :c&n:iliilii:', i;': ('a3~,it~r;~':.
"NAme:: .. '. .' ..' " ... ... ... .' .. . . : ~ ',: :.;'.,.:'~::.:~::~:~:: ~ ;vsF:W&%F ;;'~t~~~l
.. .' .. .. ....:........... " ..,.......: ~ .' ; ; ~ : ""'. . .' '. ',. .. .. ..~.. ... .. ~
,'. ....... .-. ....;.:.1-...'..1'..-:...,
... '" .: :.:.:' ., '. . :; :,.' ;: ::: .: ::~.~:.~'~'~ ~.: :
... .. . '.. - .- ._, ..... I."' .....,. . . .' .. .. ....".. .................. . ..
raccoon Procyon lotor Mesic Sighted - -
hammock
fish crow Corvus Mesic Audible - -
ossifragus hammock
boat-tailed Quiscalus major Mesic Sighted - -
grackle - hammock
brown Toxostoma Mesic Sighted - -
thrasher rufum hammock
northern Cardinalis Mesic Audible - -
cardinal cardinalis hammock
American Alligator Improved Sighted T(SjA)5 sse
alligator mississippiensis pasture
Plants
needle palm RhapidlJphyllum Mixed Sighted C3C6 -
hystrix wetland
system
lV.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
2F1orida Game & Fresh Water Fish Commission.
~ndangered.
4species of special concern.
5Threatened due to similarity of appearance.
6Non-candidate due to removal of threat.
~Sl44\R.EPORTS\ANA.L YSIS.321
4.0 CONCLUSION
Four bald eagle nests exist near the Battle Ridge project site according to FGFWFC. Uplands in
the southeast corner of the site are outside recommended primary and secondary zones, 750 and
1,500, respectively. The bald eagles are classified as urban, due to their close proximity and
adaptability to existing urban development and transportation corridors,
As a result of the gopher tortoise census, no gopher tortoise or commensal species were identified
within the upland communities. Upland habitat areas were determined to be potentially low for
gopher tortoise and commensal T&E species. The site has a potential for occasional incidental use
by listed bird species, including the white ibis and wood stork; however, any use of the upland areas
by these species would be merely incidental. There are no roosting or nesting habitats available on-
site. The uplands on the Battle Ridge project side do not provide critical habitat for any T&E plant
or animal species.
Based on the location of the site adjoining two major transportation corridors, surrounded by
existing development and its past disturbance of logging activity, we do not believe there i.s any
significant occurrence or use by any protected plant or animal species.
Any opinions expressed in this report concerning environmental regulatory matters, including
but not limited to wetland jurisdiction, wetland permitting, wetland mitigation requirements.
water quality. and threatened and endangered species, are provided based on data, site
conditions, and information available on the date of issuance of this document. The opinions
expressed concerning these matters are for planning purposes only, and should not be used as
a final determinant of regulatory agency position. The only assurance of agency position can
be obtained through the appropriate environmental regulatory process.
9SlA4 \1U:.l'ORTS\Al'lAJ.. YSJsJtl'T
14
APPENDIX
PROTECTED PLANTS AND ANIMALS WITH POTENTIAL
FOR OCCURRENCE ON THE BATILE RIDGE
PROJECT SITE, SEM1NOLE COUNlY, FLORIDA
95144\REPORTS\ANAL YSIS. RPT
Table 1. Protected Plants and Animals with Potential for Occurrence on the Battle Ridge Project Site, Seminole Co~nty, Florida.
Taxa
Habitat
Designated Slatus}
USF\VS2 FGFWFC3 FDA 4
FISH
CentTopomus undecimaJis
common snook
sse
REPTILES
Alligator mississippiensis
AmeJican alligator
Wetlands, lakes, and streams.
T(SjA)
sse
DryfTlBlchon corais cQuperi
eastern indigo snake
Pine f1atwoods, tropical hammocks.
T
T
Gopherus polyphemus
gopher tortoise
Xeric; sand pine, longleat pine, turkey oak and live oak hammocks and
sand pine scrub.
C2
sse
BIRDS
Campephilus principaJis
ivory-billed woodpecker
Mature stands of 10000and hardwood away from man and without cutting.
E
E
Dendroica kirtlandii
Kirtland's warbler
Migrant in Florida in a variety ot habitats.
E
E
Egretta thula
snowy egret
Ponds, stream banks, marshes, and pastures.
sse
Egretta (fic%r
tricolored heron
Ponds, stream banks, marshes, and pastures.
sse
9:5131\REPORTS\ANAL YSrS.l
Table 1. Pro1ected Plants and Animals with Potential for Occurrence on the Battle Ridge Project Si1e, Seminole County, Florida,
Taxa
Habitat
Designated SlatUs.1
USFWS2 FGFWFc3 FDA 4
Elanoides f. forfica1J.Js Woodlands, especially wooded swamps. C3C
American swallow-tailed kite
Eudocimus albus Wetlands; nests on islanrls In marshes or mangroves. SSC
white ibis
Grus americana T SSC
whooping ctane
Grus canadensis pratensis Wet prairies. marshy lake margins, and low-lying improved cat1Ie pastures. T
Florida sandhill crane
Mycteria americ.ana Wetfands; nesting in cypress or mangrove swamps. E E
wood stork
MAMMALS
CanIs 1IJfus floridanus Preferred warm, moist densely vegeta1ed habitat Both upland and E
Florida red wolf wetland areas, ocoupying pine forests, bottomland hardwoods, and
coastal marshes. Considered extinct
Felis concalor Most habitats. T(SjA)
Ursus afnericanus f{oridanus Swamps, bays, and thickets. Protective status not applicable within the C2 T
Florida black bear Apalachicola National Forest.
PLANTS
Asplenium platyneuron Hammocks and woods. T
ebony spleenwort
95 n1\REPORTS\ANA!. YSlS.l
Table 1. Protected Plarrts and Animals with Poternial for Occurrence on the Battle Ridge Project Site, Seminole County, Florida.
TaJta
Habitat
Designated Statusl
USFWs2 FGFWFc3 FDA4
Aster pinffolius
pal&-vio(e1 abler
Pine lands, wet woods, and barrens.
C3B
Bromellads
bromeliads
All native species except Spanish moss and ball moss and those on the
Endangered or Commercially Exploited Plant Us:.
T
Catopsis spp.
ca10psis
All native species (bromeliads).
E
ChrysophyJ/um oliviforme
satinleaf
Hammocks and pine lands.
E
Dennst4edJia bipinn818
cuplel fem
Epiphyte in hammocks, thickets, or denser swamps on deep soil.
E
Ferns
fems
All nalive species except Mosquito fern, swamp fem, cinnamon and royal
fern, serpent fem, resurrection fern, common bracken, water fern. shield
fern, and Virginia chain fern, and those on the Endangered or
Commercially Exploned Plant List
T
/lex cassine
cassine
Floodplains. coas1aJ f1atwoods, and swales.
c
/lex opaca
American holly
Hammocks and bluffs.
c
/lex spp.
ilex
All nalive species except cassine, large gallbeny,gallberry, myrtl&-Ieafed
holly, American holly, & yaupon, and those on the Endangered or
Commerclally Explortad List
T
Illicium parviftorum
star anise
Wet woods and swamps
C2
T
9S l37\REPORTS\ANAL YSIS,l
Table 1. Protected Plants and Animals with P01entlal10r Occurrence on the Battle Ridge Project Site, SemInole County, Florida.
Taxa
Habitat
Designated Slatusl
USFWs2 FGFWFC3 FDA4
Undera meliss/folla
pondbeny
Basin and dome swamps and hydric hammocks.
E E
Nemastylis floridana
lal~flowering ixia
Swamps, marshes, and wet pine flatwoods.
C2 E
OphioglossLlm palmawm
handfem
Palm hammocks; as an epiphyte on cabbage palms.
C3C E
Orchids
orchids
All native species (tenestrial and epiphytic) exoept those on the
Endangered or Commercially Exploited Ust
T
Osmunda cinnamomea
cinnamon fern
Acid swamps, wet flatwoods, and floodplains.
C
Osmunda regal/s
loyal fern
Wetwoods and swamps.
C
Palms
palms
All native species except: cabbage palm and saw palmetto and those on
the Endangeroo or ComfT\€rcialty Exploited Ust.
T
Pinguicula spp.
butterworts
All native species, except those on the Endangered Ust. Bogs and
adjacent swamps.
T
Rhapidophytlum hys/rix
needle palm
Hammocks.
C3C
c
Rhododendron spp.
rhododendrons
All native species except those on the Endangered or Commercially
Exploited Ust.
T
Stachys tenuifo/ia
nanow-Ieaved betony
Calcareous mesic woods.
E
95131\Rl'.PORTS\ANAL YSJSj
::,.-,.:,..;-
. ..!'
.: ',/. j~'"
. -.. ~ : '
:. .;
Table 1. Protected Plan1s and Animals with Potential1or Occurrence on the Bat1le Ridge Project Site, Seminole County, Florida.
Taxa
Habilat
Designaled Slatus1
uSFWsl FGFWFCJ FDA 4
Tillandsia fasciculata
common wild-pIne
Epiphyte in cypress swamps and hammocks.
C
Tillandsia simulata
wild pine
Hammocks and swamps.
T
Tillandsia utTiculata
giant wild-pine
Epiphyte in cypress swamps & hammocks.
C
Vittaria lineata
shoestring fern
Hammocks; epiphytic.
T
Zephyranthes spp.
zephyrarrthes
All white species exoept those on the Endangered or Commercially
Exploited List.
T
1E = Endangered; T = Threatened; T(S{A) = Threatened due to Similarity of Appemance; SsC = Species of Special Concern; C1 = Candidate for US1lng, Sufficient Information
Available; C2 = Candidate for Ustlng, Insufficient Information at Present; C3A = Non-Candida1e due to Possible Extinction; C3B = Non-Candidate due to Invalid Name; C3C = Non-
Candidate due to Removal of Threat; C = Commercially Exploited
2U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
3florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission
4Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
951 J1\RE.PORTS\ANAL YSl 5.1
ll-U'j-:jJ lU.,)! Am fI\Vl\11.,11[ Vfo fllln[;,j\ 'Jl1W'"
NOV-09-'95 THU 10:46 IL
TEL NO:
;;116 P"02
Semino(e Countr Government
COIllI"eh.,ui..Pl.....,.."DI...i.lon 1101 E~nFiIIlSI"""1 Sanro,dFL 32nt.1468 T.I.phon.(.07) 321.1130hullflon 7J!:l1 I'AXBO.?~16
November 9, 1995
Mr. Tam Grimms, AICP
Community Development CoordInator
City of Winter SprIngs
1126 East S.R. 434
Winter SpringB, FL 32708
Subjlct:
AnnexllItlon and Plan Amendment of Battle Ridge Campania.,
Carroll, Weaver, and Minter Properties
Dear Mr. Grlmms:
The County is in receipt of the draft staff report for the annexation and plan amendment
requests for the subject properties and has conducted a preliminary review of the
information provided. Based upon this Initial review. County staff offers the following
comments.
_jeaiti~
:...T'
Page 3, Item #6, of the support documentation prepared for the land use amendment of
the Battle Ridge property Identifies that the projected traffic impact for the amendment
to Low Density Residential (3.5 dwelling units per acre) would be less than the
projected impBct of the existing SUburban Estates (1 dwelling unIt per acre) land use
designation. As you know, all density calculationa under the Seminole County
Comprehensive Plan are based on "net buildable acres. II This means of course that
the calculations are made based upon the number of acres within the boundary of a
development excluding areas devoted to road rights-of-way, transmission power line
easements, lak19s and wetland or floodprone areas. Therefore the maximum units
allowed for this property under the County's current adopted future land use
designation of Suburban Estates would be approximately 70 dwelling units (as opposed
to the 300 units Indicated).
~~_l~li!~~
The County also reviewed a request for incrsssed density on the Battle RIdge
properties site during the Sprln~ 1994 Plan amendment cycle, and on January 25,
1994, the Board of county Commissioners (the "Board") approved for transmittal to the
Department of Community Affairs (the "Department") a land use amendment from Rural
10 (1 dwelling unit per ten acres) to Planned Development and associated rezoning
from A-10 to PUD, The Department subsequently issued an Objections,
Recommendations and Comments (ORC) Report objecting to the proposed amendment
citing several concerns. The enclosed attachment includes a summary of these
EXIllBIT "D"
ll-U;l-;l:J lU:Jj'A1\1 'rl\VlYI i.,111 Vf' ill111C.r-. .)[r-.\l')
1 U JI U V
NQV-09-'95 THU 10:47 IL '
TEL NO:
t:l1i6 P03
Tom Orlmms
November 9, 1995
Pa2~2
obj9ctlons as w911 as the complete>> text of the ORC Report. Of significance, hOW9\19r,
was the primary objection of the State regarding th8 Incompatibility of the amendment
with the Rural Area Including adjacent Rural 10, Rural 5 and Suburban Estates uses.
In response to the objections raised by the Department the Board directed staff to conduct
Q small araa study that would be designed to definitively establish a boundary for urban
development in this areal including l!lppropriate land use designations within the urban
boundary adjacent to the Rural Area, end that would successfully address the need to
transition lend uses from the Central Florida GreenaWay (SR 417) to the East Rural Area
of Seminole County. The BCe acknowledged that this re..evaluatlon was to be predicated
on two significant changes that had occurred In this area which warranted a re-evaluatlon
of land use compatibility. These were:
1. The>> completion of the Central Florida GreenaWay (S. R. 417); and
2. Acknowledgment by the City of Winter Springs that It has both the available capacity
and desire to extend central watsr snd sewer services into this area of Seminole
County.
This study, which became known as the GreenaWay/S. R. 434 Sl'lJjll Area Studv, included
a total of five (5) communlty meetings during the months of September, October and
November, 1994, to identify community issues and prepare recommendations relating to
future growth and development wIthin the study arel!l (see attached study which also
Includes a map of the study area boundary).
In preparing the findings and recommendations for the small area study, Seminole
County staff focused on the expectations and direction giv8n by the Board at the June
14, 1994 Public Heerlng which was to "establish an boundary for urban development In
this area... to prevent the erosion of the rural character of the area." The most clear and
consistent finding throughout the study process was the overwhelming desire of the
community to preserve the rural character of the study area. Pertinent specific findings
from the study are summarIzed oolow.
~,
1. Preaerving a Rural Lifestyle. While the desire to preserve a rural lifestyle is in and
of itself 11 very simple goal, there are circumstances unique to this area that make
achieving this goal more difficult. Foremo$t, this is the first elrea in Seminole County
with II long established rural community in the vicinity of two rapidly growing cities. In
most other C8ses, the expansion of urban areas occurs In infi/l areas that are vacant or
sparsely occupied.
ll-U~-~J lU:.)i AM HUM ll11 U~ W1Nll:.K ;)(Kv::'
NOU-09- '95 THU 1\3: 48 ID :
TEL NO:
IH16 P"04
Tom Grimms
November 9, 1995
Paio 3
Indeed, In the context of rural area pre8~rvation end future urban expansion, future
transitions through tlma are d1fflcult to vIsualize because they affeot lands that era
predominantly vacant. Existing patterns of vacant land should not be confused with
those lands that are In specific use as rural residential neighborhoods. Distinctions
should be made regarding lands essential to preserving a rural lifestyle, (large lot
single family residential) and land on the fringe of urban development which is only
considered rural because it Is vacant.
2. Rural Core Area. Defining the areas that constitute the existing rural community
and the lands which are essential to preserve the Integrity of the rural area are, then,
particularly critical to preserving the rural character of this area. As we evaluated th18
entire study area and through our discussions with the community, It I. very clear that
the core of the existing rural community Is In the area generally described a.s Black
Hammock. This area has historically been an agricultural community with a growing
rural residential neighborhood base.
3. Dlatlnguishlng Urban Areas from Rural Areas. To help define the . boundary
between existing and future urban and rural communities there Qre two traditional
techniques available to preserve compatibility betvYeen different densities or intensities
of uses:
Transition. - The stepping down of land uses from higher densities to less
intense uses. Staff believes that thIs technique Is ineffective In a rural area
because it does not clearly identify the future limits of urban development and
will likely IQad to urban sprawl.
t:1
Urban Boungm - A line that defines where urban uses stop and rural uses
begin. The timing of Increased densityllntenslty of uses within the urban area
should be based upon actual 8urrounding uses. physical and environmental
constraints and public facility capacity. Staff believes this. Is the most
appropriate technique to ensure the preservation of the rural community Into the
future.
4. Land Uae Influencea along SR 434. SR 434 is currently a two lane facility of rural
design with heavy tree canopy from Tuskawllla Road east through. the study area.
FDOT is preparing to construct a four-lane urban design section west of SR 417
(GreenaWay) from Tuskawllls Road to SR 4171n fiscal year 1997/1998.
Because land along SR 434 Is predominately vacant today. this corridor is viewed as
an entrance Into rural east Seminole County.
SR 434, east of S.R. 417, Is included in the 20 year Financially Feasible Regional
Tr2insportation Plan for future four-hane construction. However. FOOT will not progr2m
ll-U~-~J lU:JI AM rKVM ~ll[ vr nlnl~~ Jr~U0
NDU-09-'95 THU 10:48 1D;
TEL NO:
IH i6 P05
--....--- ..
Tom Grlmms
November 9. 1995
fJlie 4
Improvements until resolution of the conflict with the constrained Intersection at SR
426/CR 419/SR 434 in downtown Oviedo.
5. I!nvlronmental Influences. Unincorporated Seminole County, east of SR 417 and
north of SR 434, is bounded on the north by Lake Jesup and contains environmentally
sensitive lands which constrain Intense development. S~mlnole County's current land
development regulations are designed to protect and preserve environmental features
and would serve as a limitation to Intense development.
-~~
Based upon these findings of the ~eeneWav/SR 434 Smlidl Area Stud'i. staff
recommended a change from Rural 10 to Suburban Estates with a maxImum density of
one (1) dwel\lng unit per net buildable Bcre for the Battle Ridge site and adjacent land.
Staff further recommended a change from RUTal 10 to Rural 3 for those properties east
of the Battle Ridge site to DeLeon Street 8S transitional land uses between the urban
end rural araas. On December 13, 1994, the Board approved the GreeneWey/~
~ including staff recommendatIons.
. 0 ............I~.j1.....'" ,~~
"Y J...........,. ""''';'ir<
. ~l"''''l.r sr",'tt .l.L~:,;
E...,..J...~.......J.. ....,...,...:
Thus based upon staff findings and issues of the community documented above,
County staff would 8uggest that the City of Winter Springs Local Planning Agency must
conclude that the proposed amendment to Low Density Is inconsistent with sound
planning practices in vIew of the following:
1. Although this land is predominantly vacant today and It Is located within the
future urban boundary, both the environmental and roadway influences constrain
this land use to the minimum Ilcceptable urban density. that Is Suburban Estates
(I dwelling unit per acre).
2. Designation of higher densities along SR 434 and within the urban area must be
timed with the expansion of SR 434 east of SR 417.
3. There has been no change in the aree since the ~reeneWa"/S.R. 434 Small
tJ.~a Stud'i was completed last December. The findings and recommendations
presented in the study repniisent the moat effectivs and appropriate solutions to
sucoessfully transition urban land uses from the SR 417 interchange st SR 434
to the Rural Area.
4. The proposed amendment& to Low Density Residential currently under review by
the City of Winter Springs would be Inconsistent with the Gre9n9Wav/S.J~. 434
l I :.. U ';j - ';j J 1 U : j I M,l H V M 'v l I I V r n 1 l'U l:. 1\ .)1 1\ \JJ
. _..___, . ~~OV-09-' 95 THU 10: 49 ID\
TEL NO:
1:H16 P'06
Tom Grimms
November 9, 1995
PBje ~
~ Ilnce this Inten.e urban designation would not protect the
rural character of the abutting properties.
If the amendment 15 recommended, staff would suggest thet the Local Planning Agency
consider no greater Intensity than the City's desIgnation of Rural Residential (1
dwelling unit per Qcre, or 1868) to reduce the impacts from future development on the
adjacent rural area of unIncorporated Semlnola County.
Staff appreciates the opportunity to comment on this amendment. If you have any
questions, please contact Tony Matthews of the Comprehensive Planning Division at
(407) 321-1130. extension 7371.
Sincerely,
~Afr1cvf~
Frances E. Chandler
Comprehensive Planning Manager
Encloaure
FC:tm
p:brannex.doc.tm (11/95)
co: Seminole County Board of County Commissioners
Ron Rabun. County Manager
Kevin Grace, Deputy County Manager
Tony VanDerworp, Planning & Devl!)lopment Director
Lonnie Groot, Deputy county Attorney
Winter Springs City CommIssIoners
Winter Springs Local Planning Agency
John Govoruhk, City Manager, WInter Springs
David Moon, City of Oviedo
ll-U~-~j lU:jl Jl.M HU~1 \.,1[[ Vr- 'Nll~l[;.l\ ,)fl\\1')
TEL NO:
l:i116 P07
" .1'jUV-'()':l-' '::l::J I HU 10: 50 1.
ATTACHMENT
summary of DCA ObJections, Recommendations, and Comments
to the SemlnolG County Future Land Use Map Amendment
for Battle Ridge Propertl"
A. Land U,e Comoatlbilit'l
. The proposed amendment is Inconsistent with the objectives/policies of the Future
Land Use Element regarding urban sprawl, development of rural areas and
pr8vention of strip commercial, as the proposal would set a precedent for
commercial development along SR 434. '
. The proposed amendment is incompatIble with surrounding US8S of Rural 10. Rural
'5 and Suburban Estates, and would allow intrusion of higher density uses into an
area of lower densIty, rural and semi-rural uses.
. In additIon, DCA objected that the amendment is not supported by data and analysis
demonstrating that the future land use change Is n\?edeg to accommodate the
county's projected population (and employment).
B. Environmentally Setlsltlve Area./Natural Reeources
. The proposed amendment Is Inconsistent with objectives/policies of the Future Land'
Use Element regardIng protection of natural. historic and archaeological resource..
The amendment should be made consistent, Including revisions if liIppropriate
based upon data and analysis.
. The proposed amendment is Inconsistent with the Conservation Future Land Use
Element. since soma of the property Is Indicated to be In tha Conservation Overlay,
and the proposal may need to be revised basad upon appropriate data and
analysis.
C. ~ons9ry.tlon EljmQntIVeaetat12n and Wildllf' Ha~lta.t
. The proposed amendment Is inconsistent with Comprehensive Plan
objectives/policies reQarding wildlife protection. The amendment should be made
consistent, Including appropriate revisions based upon adequate data and analysis.
. This appears to involve habitat areas, whIch could be permanently lost, for several
threatened and endangered specie I or species of special concern.
Page 1
II-U~-~~ lU:SI AM rKUM ~111 Vf nlnlC~ 0r~U0
1 U VI U U
--- -....-.
I~L. I'iU:
:;116 ~'<:.lb
D. Potable W;?Jter ~n~ Sanliarv S,wef ~IGmentt:t
. The proposed land use :amendment would be inconsistent with Future Land Use
Element objectives/policies prohibiting expansion of central watsr and sewer
facilities in the area covered by the Rural Area Plan.
. The proposed Qmendment is for development which requires central water and
sewer servIces, but involves property located within the area covered by the 1991
Rural Area Plan, outside of any presently depicted central water/sewer service area.
E. IrafDc Circuf.tlon Element
. The proposed amendment would be Inconsistent with objectives and policies of the
Traffic Circulation Element concerning coordination of land uses with transportation
facilities.
. The proposed amendment would generate addItional traffic (5,400 ADT estimate)
impacting SR 434 Qnd potentially other roads.
. It is not idantlfied how improvements needed to maIntain adopted Level of Service
(LOS) standards on affected roadways, including SR 434, will be scheduled and
funded.
F. O~h.r
. DCAls objections cite numerous goels and policIes of the State and Regional
Comprehensive Plans. Several agencie8 and citizen groups also opposed the PUD
prOposal (see enclosed).
Pai6 2
1'1 ----:.~-
I ---- ~...' L
II' ---'''' ...........-- ---
I , , - ...........-- ...
1111~;;; ...........-----:- ".'"
/:' ,'rPfP ...........--...../-:
---- ----. -- .f-'<' --"; //
, _--- I I _':
~~-------ril-' ~~?3 l
r"" III ::'
I L.._""I' :.
~ !!..Im~"= _ _ ~ " I, I . :~. . .'
J I III
IL....J ,
:~ 11'1 ...~..'
Jq I' .
.., ,I 1'111
I J I
L- _ _ _ _ _ _ --' I~'
1;;11
I ~[ ..': "
r-~ . . .
'II. . :
L .lll" : :
l,1 ~:~ "
'II .-
'I .
- - - - - - ;] n r l't. :=
~,~ 1 1
~J!:\ 'rll't' :
g'~ I ~:
~~__~1 ]~:.
I! I ~
i!~- . \-
:11
)i~---I
J /1A I
I ___/~' I nlE
= :~ ---= =-=- - ~ J ~Jz
----~ -- 00
""J:;
__-1 On
... "'10
// I ~I~
-- I :;;j
I I
I J
: :
___~~~IEDq________~
StWINOI.E COU"f '
I
I
V,1,J o,)J../ ;:lIU
""..." v''''' ____
r
'.
'.
".
g
.'
. -<!l'"
~,~
'" ~
" If;;
~In
8 g
~~
I
BATTLE RIDGE
~
SOILS MAP
U -J-'I.
~
'.
........... ..
~
...... .
~;!
~~
~Cl
~ '" "0 Ie
B~ ~ ~ ~
~i ~ ~ ~
~8 s "' ~
~!l ~ c
~ ? f;!
a ~ ~
'" ~
~ lit ~
~
g
~
~
i
I
'.
~
'.
------..
,.
I
I
I
I
I
"'t;l~ "'""
G1" I
a~ e~ I
-!il _!:l I
h ~~ 0 I
~ I
~ I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~ ~ ~ ~
: ~
o ~
~
~
'"
>-
~
%
'"
'"
a
'"
:c
t!
'"
o
l"
~
~
C C L CONSULTANTS ,IHC .
OI'tdlU ''''M'I"On ~,,'n t::J.
. DftI .- ~1'\041 qnt . c.m tlP"ot,,,
~ WQ'f' ,a,&.Iif I'-'CM ~lC
EXIflBIT "E"
".OilIf'TICN
If
, T(
V')~
" '\"lI'" ,"
,0.,.0 .../
..",))'f" /"'/
.' /
~.....
.........
~.~............:.........
,."...........- ,...::::::---
"....... ..,/
..... .......
",/ ,6"""
...../
~
...~ Il----
~L
r ~
n
__J
L
l ~ ."..
"__CAMI'f
~
"
~-
~~l
?~
- ,.,
~ ~
~,
~
'"
c:
...
0"" IT] lIJrn /'"
~~i
n_~ ':..,c' ~
~::~
:;ilj ~~ .....t'\t ~ ~
:'0
..- ~F~
tt:l~
"~ Ii! ~~~ ~
~ ~H..o ~
8 ~~~~
a "
0 i1-"'~ ~
Q o~a' J
~ ~;~~
~ Pi:;" q
S 6568
II ..
:s ~ii
~
"
BATTLE RIDGE
--.a~
C C L CONSULTANTS .INC
'''0111('011 SI./t"o'l'OOS """"""en n
f:j.
.'f'\,MQ1\l IoInl ~'1 ....n. A
OftWOO "tI, hl.ll IV.CH tv D"l J'
O'~'CII~
FLOOD toAAP
Jr
011 I."-'~
~
DC.tCQl~lIQW
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
. . ;1.
1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32708-2799
Telephone (407) 327-1800
Community Development
LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY AGENDA ITEM:
:. !: .
IV. D.
NEW BUSINESS.. " :, .1:
CARROLL - LARGE SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
LG-CPA-2-95
STAFF REPORT
DATA , ANALYSIS CHECKLIST FOR' DCA TRANSMITTAL
NOTE:
This checklist has been reviewed and recommended by DCA
for preparation and transmi ttal of large scale
comprehensive plan amendments.
PER SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: [9J-11.oo6 F.A.C.], [Chap 163 F.S.]
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE' SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR PROPOSED LOCAL
GOVERNMENT (LARGE SCALE) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS PER
9J-1.1..006(1.) (a)1..,2. F.A.C.; 9J-1.1..006(1.) (a) 3 through 1.0 F.A.C.,
THE TRANSMITTAL' SHALL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:
,,' 't1':'
1. BOARD MEETING DATES:
A. THE DATE OR DATES,' ON WHICH THE LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
(LPA) HELD THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED PLAN
AMENDMENT [163.3174(1), (4) (a); F.S., 9J-ll.003(1);
9J-l1.006(1) (a) 1. F.A.C.].
B. THE DATE OR DATES ON WHICH THE LOCAL GOVERNING BODY HELD
THE (FIRST) PUBLIC HEARING AT WHICH THE TRANSMITTAL OF
THE PROPOSED PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY AFFAIRS WAS APPROVED AND THE DATE THAT THE
PROPOSED AMENDMENT AND ONE' COpy OF EACH ITEM SPECIFIED
UNDER 9J-ll.006(1) (a),(b),(c),(d) WAS SUBMITTED TO THE
REVIEW AGENCIES, PER 9J-l1. 006 (6); [9J-l1. 006 (1) (a) 2. ;
163.3184(15) (b) F.S.]
comprehensive Plan Amendment
Checklist for DCA Transmittal
n. GENERAL INFORMATION:
A. SIZE OF PROPERTY: [9J-11. 006 (1) (a) 3.]
13.6 acres
B. TYPE OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT:
[9J-11. 006 (1) (a) 3.]
Text Amendment
Future Land Use Map
Other
x
C. BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT(S) CONTENT AND
EFFECT: [9J-11.006(l) (a)3.]
Owner requests redesignation of his land from Seminole
County Future Land Use Map "Rural-3" to City of winter
springs Future Land Use Map "Low Density Residential".
The effect would be to allow development of the property
between 1.1 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre.
D. EXPLANATION OF THE REASON FOR THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT:
[9J-11. 006 (1) (a) 3.]
The property owner has requested the City of winter
springs to annex his property into the City and has
requested the City provide sewer and water service. The
City has indicated it is very interested in providing
these services and the other urban services presently
provided to all other properties within the City.
E. INDICATE HOW THE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION REQUIREMENTS OF
9J-11.003, 9J-S.004, F.A.C., 163.3174, 163.3181, CHAPTER
119, AND CHAPTER 286, F.S. HAVE BEEN MET. INCLUDE THE
REQUIREMENTS OF 9J-11.004(2) (a)6,(b):
The Local Planning Agency public hearing was advertised
twice, on and again on in the
Orlando sentinel, which circulates throughout the City of
winter springs (per 9J-11. 003 (5) F. A. C. and 163.3174
F. S. ) . The public hearing notice in the newspaper
indicated that interested person may attend and be heard
[per 9J-11. 003 (3)] and that information on items of
public hearing agenda may be obtained at the City Hall
[per 9J-5.004(3)', 119.07(1) (a) F.S: and 286.011(1) (2)
F.S.] The public hearing notice also indicated that
2
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Checklist for DCA Transmittal
person with disabilities needing assitance to participate
in any of the proceedings should contact tha City 48
hours in advance of the meeting [per 286.26(1) F~S.].
The City Commission held a first public hearing on
, a weekday days after- the day that the- first
advertisement was published. in the Orlando Sentinel,
which circulates throughout the City of winter- Springs
[per 163.3184(15) (b) (1) F.S. and 9J-11.003(5) F.A.C.].
The public hearing notice in the newspaper indicated that
the public hearing was to be held on day of
at interested person may attend and be
heard [per 9J-11. 003 (3)] and that information on items of
the public hearing agenda may be obtained at the City
Hall [per 9J-5.004(3), 119.07(1) (a) F.B. and
286.011(1) (2) F.S.] The public hearing notice also
indicated that person with disabilities needing assitance
to participate in any of the proceedings should contact
the City 48 hours in advance of the meeting [per
286.26(1) F.S.].
F. IS THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT REQUESTING THE DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY AFFAIRS REVIEW THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT?:
[9J-11. 006 (1) (a) 3.]
Yes.
G. PROPOSED MONTH OF ADOPTION OF THE PROPOSED PLAN
AMENDMENT: [9J-11.006(1) (a)4.]
60 days after the receipt of the ORC Report from the
Florida Department of community Affairs,
per 163.3184(7) F.B., or after clarification and
resolution of items in the ORC Report with the Florida
Department of Community Affairs.
H. IS AMENDMENT IN AN AREA OF CRITICAL STATE CONCERN OR
RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ?:
[9J-11. 006 (1) (a) 5. ]
No.
I. (FOR PLAN AMENDMENTS WITHIN ORANGE, LAKE AND SEMINOLE
COUNTIES) DOES THE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLY TO THE WEKIVA
RIVER PROTECTION AREA? [CHAPTER 369, PART III, F.S.]
No.
3
r
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Checklist for DCA Transmittal
J. IS AMENDMENT WITHIN OTHER PROTECTED AREAS?:
[9J-11. 006 (1) (a) 3.]
No.
K. IS THE AMENDMENT AN EXEMPTION TO THE TWICE PER CALENDAR
YEAR LIMITATION ON THE ADOPTION OF PLAN AMENDMENTS?:
[9J-11. 006 (1) (a) 7.]
No.
IF YES, IS THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT DIRECTLY RELATED TO:
1. A proposed development of regional impact (DRI) or
substantial deviation [380.06(6) (b), F.S.].
2. Small scale development activities
[163.3187(1) (c) F.S.].
3. Emergency [163.3187(1) (a) F.S.].
4. Amendment submitted to the Department of Community
Affairs pursuant to a compliance agreement.
[9J-11.006(l) (a)7.d.; 163.3184(10), (11) F.S.]
5. Amendment to an Inter-Governmental Coordination
E I e men t [ 9 J - 1 1 . 006 ( 1 ) ( a ) 7 . e . ;
163 . 3177 ( 6) (h) 1. a. , b. , c and d., F. S . ]
L. HAS THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT SENT A COPY OF ITS COMPLETE
ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INCLUDING AMENDMENTS WITH
SUPPORT DOCUMENTS TO ALL REVIEW AGENCIES?
[163.3184(3)(a), F.S.; 9J-11.006(1) (a)S.; 9J-l1.00S(9),
F.A.C.]:
1. Regional planning agency;
Yes.
2. Department of Environmental Protection;
Yes.
3. Department of Transportation;
Yes.
4
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Checklist for DCA Transmittal
4. Water management district;
Yes.
5. Any other unit of local government or government
agency in the state that has filed a written
request with the governing body for the plan or
plan amendment.
No request has been made.
6. Appropriate county planning agency
(NOTE: Only for newly created jurisdictions).
7. Florida Department of state
(NOTE: Only for newly created jurisdictions).
8. Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission
(NOTE: County plans only); and
9.
The Department of Agriculture
Services, Division of Forestry
(NOTE: County plans only).
and Consumer
M. IS THE AMENDMENT TO BE ADOPTED UNDER A JOINT PLANNING
AGREEMENT? [163.3171 F.S.; 9J-11.006(1) (a) (9) F.A.C.]:
1. If yes, list the local governments included in the
agreement:
(Not Applicable)
2. Is transmittal letter signed by the chief elected
official (or his designee) of each local
government?:
(Not Applicable)
N. LOCAL GOVERNMENT CONTACT: NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE OF LOCAL
GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE FAMILIAR WITH PROPOSED
AMENDMENT(S) AND IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ENSURING THAT THE
MATERIALS TRANSMITTED ARE COMPLETE: [9J-11. 006 (1) (a) 10.,
F.A.C. ]
Thomas J. Grimms, AICP Community Development Coordinator
City of winter Springs City Hall (407) 327-1800 X 315
1126 East State Road 434
winter Springs, FL 321708-2799
5
"
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Checklist for DCA Transmittal
ll. NATURE OF PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT:
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR PROPOSED
LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT AND MAP AMENDMENTS:
(9J-11. 006 (1) (b)]
NOTE:
ADDRESS ITEMS BELOW AS APPROPRIATE TO THE SPECIFIC PLAN
AMENDMENT.
A.
GENERAL
SUBMIT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS A TOTAL OF
SIX (6) COPIES OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT PACKAGE. THE
PROPOSED AMENDMENT PACKAGE SHALL INCLUDE:
* RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE STAFF, LOCAL PLANNING
AGENCY, LOCAL GOVERNING BODY: [9J-ll.006(1) (c)]
* ALL PROPOSED TEXT, MAPS, AND SUPPORT DOCUMENTS
WHICH INCLUDE DATA AND ANALYSES IN THE FOLLOWING
FORMAT: [9J-l1.006(1) (b)]
NOTE:
Impact calculations should be done for
each amendment as well as on a cumulative
basis for all the amendments, together,
if more than one amendment is submitted.
1. PROPOSED TEXT CHANGES
(as reflected on new pages of the affected element,
shown in a strike through and underline format or
similar easily identifiable format identifying the
plan amendment number on each page affected) :
[9J-ll.006(1) (b), F.A.C.]
No text changes are requested.
2. PROPOSED MAP CHANGES
Pertains only to a Regulatory Land Use Plan Map
Amendment. [9J-ll.006(1) (b) F.A.C.]
a. The boundary of the subject property,
surrounding street and thoroughfare network,
surrounding future land uses, and natural
resources:
(See Exhibit "A")
6
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Checklist for DCA Transmittal
b. The present land use designation(s) of the
subject property and abutting properties:
Seminole county Future Land Ose Map "Rural-3"
for the subject property.
c. The proposed future land use designation(s)
for the subject property:
ci ty of winter Springs Future Land Ose Map
"Low Density Residential" (1.1 - 3.5 DO/acre).
d. The size of the subject property in acres or
fractions thereof:
13.6 acres
e. General location map if the land use plan map
does not show the entire jurisdiction:
(See Exhibit "B")
f. Map or description of existing land uses (not
designations) of the subject property and
surrounding properties:
Vacant; tree
property.
foliage
covers
extent
of
g. Maximum allowable development under existing
designation for the site:
Maximum 1 DU per 5 acres (Seminole County
comprehensive Plan).
NOTE:
Seminole County has submitted a
comprehensive plan amendment (95-F.FLU7)
to DCA to change the land use from Rural
10 and 5 to Rural-3.
Onder Rural-5 designation: (2.4) or 2 single-
family residential units. Onder the proposed
county amendment Rural-3 designation: 4 units.
7
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Checklist for DCA Transmittal
h. Maximum allowable development under proposed
designation for the site:
Proposed City designation of Low Density
Residential (1.1 - 3.5 DU per acre): 3.5 X
13.6 = 47.6 X .12 (for r-o-w) = (41.8) or 41
actual single-family units.
i. List of objectives and policies of the Future
Land Use element and other affected elements
with which the proposed amendment is
compatible: [9J-11.006(1) (b)5.]
Goal 2, Objective A, Policies 1 -3
Goal 2, Objective B, POlciy 2
· SUBMIT SIX (6) COPIES OF THE EVALUATION AND
APPRAISAL REPORT, IF DONE IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE
PROPOSED AMENDMENT, IF APPLICABLE, OR A LETTER
CERTIFYING THAT THE E.A.R. HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY SENT
TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AND EACH
REVIEW AGENCY AS LISTED UNDER 9J-11.008(8). AND
[9J-11. 006 (1) (d) ]
(Not Applicable)
III. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT ANALYSIS:
B. ANALYSIS/RE-ANALYSIS: [9J-11.006(1) (b)4.,5. and
9J-5.005(2), F.A.CJ]
NOTE:
IF THE ORIGINAL PLAN DATA AND ANALYSIS OR THE DATA
AND ANALYSIS OF A PREVIOUS AMENDMENT SUPPORT AND
MEET THE REQUIREMENTS CITED IN 9J-5.005(2) AND
9J-ll.006(1) (b)l. THROUGH 5. F.A.C., THEN NO
ADDITIONAL DATA AND ANALYSIS ARE REQUIRED TO BE
SUBMITTED UNLESS THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED DATA AND
ANALYSIS NO LONGER INCLUDE AND RELY ON THE BEST
AVAILABLE EXISTING DATA. SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO THE
SPECIFIC PORTIONS OF THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED DATA
AND ANALYSIS ON WHICH THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT RELIES
TO SUPPORT THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT MUST BE MADE AT
THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL TO THE DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY AFFAIRS. [9J-11.007(1), (2)]
8
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Checklist for DCA Transmittal
1.
TRAFFIC CIRCULATION, INCLUDING:
[9J-S.007]
a. Roadways serving the site {indicating laneage,
functional classification and right-of-way,
current LOS, and LOS standard:
S.R. 434 2 lanes undivided; functional
classification is "Orban Principal Arterial;
Current LOS (1994) is "A" [13,265 peak hour
trips] per' Seminole County 1994 Segment
Counts.; LOS Standard is "0". ADT is 13,1.74;
LOS is "A"; LOS Standard is "E" for segment
S.R. 417 to Deleon.
For this segment, FOOT does not have counts.
Segment from S.R. 419/S.R. 434 eastward on
S.R. 434 to W. Broadway (S.R. 426), a 7 mile
2-lane undivided road segment with 3 major
intersections and 4 traffic signals: (1994)
Current LOS is "F"; and the LOS Standard is
"0" with 50 mph average speed: total AAOT is
17,000.
DeLeon Street 2 lanes; functional
classification is "local"; Current LOS not
determined; Seminole County indicates there is
no established LOS Standard set.
b. Projected LOS (indicate year) under existing
designation: .
Existing FLUM designation is "Rural-511
(Max 1. DO/Sacre) per County FLUM -201.0. NOTE:
Seminole County has submitted a comprehensive
plan amendment (95-F.FLU7) to DCA to change
the land use from Rural-10 and 5 to Rural-3.
Under proposed amendment, approximately 31.
total trips per day would be generated from a
single-family residential subdivision on this
property (utilizing ITE Trip Generation Sth
Edition). No effect on the projected LOS "A"
(per Seminole County 1.994 Segment Counts).
c. Projected LOS (indicate year) under proposed
designation (calculate anticipated number of
trips and distribution on roadway network, and
identify resulting changes to the proj ected
LOS) :
9
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Checklist for DCA Transmittal
Under proposed City FLUM designation "Lower
Density Residential" '(1.1 to 3.5 DU/acre.),
approximately 317 total trips per day would'be
generated from a single-family residential
subdivision on this property (utilizing ITE
Trip Generation 5th Edition). No effect on
the proj ected LOS "A" (per Seminole County
1994 Segment Counts).
d. Improvements/expansions (including right-of-
way acquisition) already programmed or needed
as a result of the proposed amendment:
FDOT does not have any improvements planned in
their TIP (Transportation Improvement Program
1985-2010), except that the 90 degree curve at
S.R. 434 and DeLeon street will be smoothed.
The developer plans turn lanes and
deceleration lanes to accommodate ingress and
egress to the site.
e. Evaluation of consistency with the adopted MFO
plan and FOOT's 5-year Transportation Plan:
The Orlando MPO indicated that for the project
envisioned, a small residential subdivision,
there would be no inconsistency with the MPO
Plan. The MPO Plan (in the Needs Section and
Cost Feasible section of adopted Plan to the
Year 2010) does have indicated a widening to
six lanes the section of S.R. 434 from the
GreeneWay (S.R. 417) eastward and southward to
Aloma Ave. (S.R. 426 "W. Broadway Street").
Discussions with FDOT District 5 Office at
Adanson street in Orlando 'indicated no
inconsistency with the 5 year TIP.
f. Availability of access:
The property has access to S.R. 434 and DeLeon
Street.
g. Approved by FOOT:
No driveway or connection permits have been
applied for at this time.
10
, i
I
!
,
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Checklist for DCA Transmittal
i
..~
>>4
;"1
h.
Identify the objectives and policies that
support the proposed amendment; identify any
inconsistencies and explain why there will be
no impact(s) and/or why it is not necessary to
resolve the inconsistencies:
Objective C, Policy
circulation Element
comprehensive Plan.
2 of
of
the
the
Traffic
City's
i.
Traffic Circulation Element amendment
submitted in conjunction with the regulatory
land use plan map amendment, if required:
"
i
I
!
(Not required)
j .
Is amendment to the Traffic Circulation
Element necessary as a result of the proposed
amendment ?
No.
k. Cummulative Impact Calculation on S.R. 434 of
trips generated from Battle Ridge, Carroll,
Weaver, and Minter proposed comprehensive plan
amendments submitted together:
Battle Ridge = 1.,650 trips
Carroll = 31. 7
Weaver = 542
Minter = 651.
3,260
ADT is 13,174; LOS is "A"; LOS Standard is "E"
for segment S.R. 434 to DeLeon. 13,174 +
3,260 = 16,434. County indicates trip
generation would have to exceed 18,270 before
LOS ,is negatively affected.
2.
MASS TRANSIT:
[9J-S.008]
NOTE:
Not Applicable. There are no mass
transit facilities serving the site, or
planned in the future to serve the
general area.
11
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Checklist for DCA Transmittal
3. PORTS, AVIATION, AND RELATED FACILITIES:
[9J-S.009] NOTE: Applicable to local governments
with populations of 50,000 or more.
NOTE:
Not Applicable to proposed comprehensive
plan amendment. The City of Winter
springs is under 50,000 population
(Preliminary Estimate of 25,673 per
university of Florida Bureau of Economic
and Business Research)
4. HOUSING: [9J-S.010]
a. Needs analysis to determine if development (if
it provides housing) is proposed to meet the
needs of the anticipated population:
This section of the Orlando Metropolitan Area
(north and east) is experiencing tremendous
growth. The recent completion of S.R. 417
(the beltway), the widening of S.R. 434 and
the expansion of the cities of winter Springs
and Oviedo in the region has provided for many
housing opportunities for a variety of income
levels. Some of the major employers that have
added to the demand for housing in this area
through new location or expansions are
University of Central Florida, Oviedo crossing
Shopping Mall, The Quadrangle Office Park and
the Central Florida Research Park.
b. Land requirements for the total estimated
housing need of the jurisdiction:
The low-density designation for this site will
not allow for density of more than 3.5
DU/acre. It is anticipated that much more
land will be needed to house the population of
this area than can be afforded by the subject
property.
The City's comprehensive Plan indicates the
need for 1,150 additional acres for
residential development by 2010 to allow
development of up to 5,800 dwelling units with
an average density of 5.91 DU/acre. This
comprehensive plan amendment involving 13.6
12
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Checklist for DCA Transmittal
acres for residential development, will in
part address the city's need for additional
land.
The City has very little land vacant for
additional residential development. Much of
the remaining vacant land is environmentally
sensitive. The influence or impact of the
beltway (GreeneWay S.R. 417), economic
conditions, the Orlando area housing market,
and no doubt other exogenous variables have
been underestimated at the time of the
formulation of the Future Land Use and Housing
Elements of the adopted Comprehensive Plan.
c. Identify the objectives and policies that
support the proposed amendment; identify any
inconsistencies and explain why there will be
no impact(s) and/or why it is not necessary to
resolve the inconsistencies:
In the City's comprehensive Plan Housing
Element:
Goal 1
objective D
d. Housing Element amendment submitted in
conjunction with regulatory land use plan map
amendment, if required:
(Not Applicable)
e. Is amendment to the Housing Element necessary
as a result of the proposed amendment ?
No.
5. SANITARY SEWER, SOLID WASTE, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT,
POTABLE WATER AND NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER
RECHARGE: [9J-S.011]
POTABLE WATER, INCLUDING:
[9J-S.011]
a. Facilities serving the site, current LOS, and
LOS standard:
No facilities presently serve the site. The
county has a LOS standard for annual average
13
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Checklist for DCA Transmittal
daily volume in gallons of potable water per
capita of 100 GCPD. The City has a LOS
standard of 125 GCPD.
b. Projected LOS (indicate year) under existing
designation:
No facilities presently serve the site. The
county has a LOS standard for annual average
daily volume in gallons of potable water per
capita of 100 GCPD.
c. Projected LOS (indicate year) under proposed
designation:
The projected level of service standard is 115
GCPD (gallons per capita per day) for the City
owned system.
d. Improvements/expansions already programmed or
needed as a result of proposed amendment:
The developer proposes to extend a ten-inch
(lO") water line along S.R. 434 from its
current termination at vista Willa Drive to
the project site.
e. Identify the objectives and policies that
support the proposed amendment; identify any
inconsistencies and explain why there will be
no impact(s) and/or why it is not necessary to
resolve the inconsistencies:
Objective "C" and Policy 3 under Objective "C"
of the Potable Water Sub-element of the City's
comprehensive Plan.
f. Potable Water Sub-Element amendment submitted
in conjunction with regulatory land use plan
map amendment, if required:
(Not Applicable)
g. Is amendment to the Potable Water Sub-element
necessary as a result of the proposed
amendment ?
No.
14
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Checklist for DCA Transmittal
SANITARY SEWER, INCLUDING:
[9J-5.011]
a. Facilities serving the site, current LOS,'and
LOS standard:
No facilities presently serve the site.
b. Projected LOS (indicate year) under existing
designation:
The subject property is not within the service
area of the Seminole County sanitary sewer
system.
c. Projected LOS (indicate year) under proposed
designation:
300 gallons per day single family unit for
1996-97.
d. Improvements/expansions already programmed or
needed as a result of proposed amendment:
The developer will extend a forcemain from its
existing termination' at vista Willa Drive
along S.R. 434 to the project site.
e. Identify the objectives and policies that
support the proposed amendment; identify any
inconsistencies and explain why there will be
no impact(s) and/or why it is not necessary to
resolve the inconsistencies:
Objective "C", Policies 1, 7, 9, 13
f. Sanitary Sewer Sub-element amendment submitted
in conjunction with regulatory land use plan
map amendment, if required:
(Not Applicable)
g. Is amendment to the Sanitary Sewer Sub-element
necessary as a result of the proposed
amendment ?
No.
15
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Checklist for DCA Transmittal
DRAINAGE/STORMWATER, INCLUDING:
[9J-5.011]
a. Facilities serving the site, current LOS, and
LOS standard:
Drainage ditches at the sides of the road for
S.R. 434 and DeLeon street.
b. Projected LOS (indicate year) under existing
designation:
County's projected LOS is pre-post attenuation
rate of 25 year 24 hour storm with outfall.
FOOT, for ADT over 1,500, uses 50 year storm
event for cross drain with intensity
calculations determined per specific site;
ditches are 10 year storm event; and storm
sewers are 3 year storm event.
c. Projected LOS (indicate year) under proposed
designation:
The 25 year frequency, 24 hour duration,
design storm shall be used as the basis for
stormwater management system design for
proposed new and redevelopment projects, and
for determining availability of facility
capacity for 1996-97 and beyond. The
developer will also be required to analyze the
ultimate effect of the disposal of stormwater
from storm events, up to and including the 100
year 24 hour duration storm event. In
addition, the developer will comply where
applicable with the st. Johns River Water
Management District's flood control criteria.
d. Improvements/expansions already programmed or
needed as a result of proposed amendment:
Other than on site improvements, no expansion
or improvements are necessary.
e. Identify the objectives and policies that
support the proposed amendment; identify any
inconsistencies and explain why there will be
no impact(s) and/or why it is not necessary to
resolve the inconsistencies:
16
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Checklist for DCA Transmittal
In the storm Drainage and Natural Groundwater
Aquifer Recharge Sub-Element of the City's
comprehensive Plan:
Goal 1, 'Objective B, Policies 1,2,3, and 4
Goal 2, Objective A, Policies 1, 2, and 3
Goal 2, Objective B, Policies 1 and 3
f. Drainage Sub-element amendment submitted in
conjunction with regulatory land use plan map
amendment, if required:
(Not required)
g.
Is amendment to
necessary as a
amendment ?
the Drainage Sub-element
result of the proposed
No.
SOLID WASTE, INCLUDING:
[9J-5.011]
a. Facilities serving the site, current LOS, and
LOS standard:
No facility/service serves the site since
there is solid waste generated from the site.
The site is a vacant, wooded area. The LOS
standard is 2.77 pounds per day per resident
(1992)
b. Projected LOS (indicate year) under existing
designation:
LOS standard is projected to be 2.85 pounds
per day per resident (1998).
c. Proposed LOS (indicate year) under proposed
designation:
The City has established a present and future
LOS of 3.77 pounds per capita per day.
d. Improvements/expansions already programmed or
needed as a result of proposed amendment:
The City'S current franchise agreement with a
solid waste hauler would cover and apply to
17
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Checklist for DCA Transmittal
the annexed property. Present agreement
requires that franchisee. shall make the
collections at each location on the same days
each week for each of the following categories
of material:
1. Garbage - 2 collections per week;
2. Yard trash - 1 collection per week;
3. Recyclable - 1 collection per week.
e. Identify the objectives and policies that
support the proposed amendment; identify any
inconsistencies and explain why there will be
no impact(s) and/or why it is not necessary to
resolve the inconsistencies:
In the solid Waste Sub-element of the City's
Comprehensive Plan:
Objective A, Policy 7
f. Solid waste Sub-element amendment submitted in
conjunction with regulatory land use plan map
amendment, if required:
(Not required)
g. Is amendment to the Solid Waste Sub-element
necessary as a result of the proposed
amendment ?
No.
6. COASTAL MANAGEMENT: [9J-5.012]
NOTE:
Not Applicable. The annexed property
prompting this comprehenisve plan
amendment is not along or in a coastal
area.
7. CONSERVATION; [9J-5.013]
a. Habitat analysis as to whether the site
contains habitat for species listed by
federal, state or local agencies as
endangered, threatened or species of special
concern (Indicate species habitats on map):
18
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Checklist for DCA Transmittal
According to the Seminole County comprehensive
Plan Conservation Element "No federally listed
endangered plants are known to exist in
Seminole county." Figure I (based on the
Florida Natural Areas Inventory) indicating
generalized locations of specially designated
species does not show any such locations of
specially designated species on the property.
b. Type and degree of disturbance to the natural
functions of environmentally sensitive landsj
specifically identify wetlands:
No distrubance of wetlands is proposed. Any
such impacts will be in accordance with local,
state and federal guidelines. A portion of
the property is indicated as having wetlands.
The city through policies in the Conservation
and Land Use Elements of its comprehensive
Plan requires protection of wetlands. For the
annexation, property owner requests a Future
Land Use Map designation of Lower Density
Residential (1.1 to 3.5 DU/acre). Proposed
development would ba a residential subdvision
with the usual disturbance associated with
construction of such a development.
c. The effect on vegetative communities:
Existing vegetation will be saved in
accordance with the City's land development
regulations.
According to the soils Survey of Seminole
county, the soils on this property indicate
the natural vegetation would consist mostly of
mixed stands of cypress, red maple, sweetgum,
cabage palm, sweetbay, and blackgum, longleaf
and slash pines and live and laurel oaks. The
understory includes lopsided indiangrass,
inkberry, saw palmetto, pineland threeawn,
waxmyrtle, bluestem, panicum, and other
grasses. These vegetation types may be
disturbed in any residential subdvision with
the usual disturbance associated with
construction of such a development. Until
such development is proposed the effect on
vegetative communities is difficult to
19
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Checklist for DCA Transmittal
determine at this time. It should be noted
that the City'S Comprehensive Plan requires
conceptual engineering proposals to include
identification and mapping of "natural
resources within property intended to be
developed, which shall include an inventory of
plants and animals designated as endangered,
threatened or species of special concern and
associated habitat required for the species to
remain viable.
d. Identify the objectives and policies that
support the proposed amendment; identify any
inconsistencies and explain why there will be
no impact(s) and/or why it is not necessary to
resolve the inconsistencies: .
In the Conservation
Comprehensive Plan:
Objective B, Policies
Objective C, Policies
Element of the
City'S
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
1, 3, 5a-f
8.
RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE, INCLUDING:
[9J-5.014]
a. Facilities serving the site, current LOS, and
LOS standard:
County LOS standard is: 3.6 acres per 1000
residents within urban community park sites;
1.8 developed park acres per 1000 residents
for total park acreage needs. This standard
includes active and passive recreational
facilities.
b. Projected LOS (including year) under existing
designation:
3.6 acres per 1000 residents within urban
community park sites; 1.8 developed park acres
per 1000 residents for total park acreage.
c. Projected LOS (indicate year) under proposed
designation:
Community Parks
Neighborhood Parks
1.6 acres/1000 population
5.9 acres/1000 population
20
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Checklist for DCA Transmittal
d. Improvements/expansions already programmed or
needed as a result of proposed amendment:
Private passive recreation for the residents
of the development, such as trails.
e. Identify the objectives and policies that
support the proposed amendmentj identify any
inconsistencies and explain why there will be
no impact(s) and/or why it is not necessary to
resolve the inconsistencies:
Objective E, Policies 1, 2
Objective H
f. Recreation and Open Space Element amendment
submitted in conjunction with regulatory land
use plan map amendment, if required:
(Not Required)
g. Is amendment to the Recreation and" Open Space
Element necessary as a result of the proposed
amendment ?
No.
9.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION:
[9J-5.015]
a. State the impacts and their significance on
the proposed amendment on adjacent local
governments:
The major impacts would be that the county
would lose 13.6 acres to the jurisdiction of
the City of winter Springs through annexation
of the property; and the county's
comprehensive plan and land development
regulations would no 10nger be effective once
the comprehensive plan amendment receives a
"Notice of Intent" from DCA.
b. List comments or objections from adjacent
local government(s):
None received at the time of this report
preparation (October 24, 1995).
21
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Checklist for DCA Transmittal
c. Identify the objectives and policies that
support the proposed amendment; identify any
inconsistencies and explain why there will be
no impact(s) and/or why it is not necessary to
resolve the inconsistencies:
Objective A, pOlicy 1
Objective C, Policy 1
Objective 0, policy 1
10. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS:
[9J-5.016]
a. Analysis as to whether the amendment is based
on the annual monitoring and evaluation review
of the capital improvements element:
This comprehensive plan amendment is not based
on the annual review of the Capital
Improvements Element since all costs of
construction of infrastructure for the
provision of urban services will be paid by
the developer. The intention of the City is
that private development will not incur a
fiscal impact on the city.
b. Fiscal impact of the proposed amendment on the
city, if any, on public facilities as
identified in other Comprehensive Plan
elements and relative priorities of those
needs:
There will be no fiscal impact to the city
with respect to the extension of sewer and
water lines. The City has a policy that "In
no event shall the city be required to pay the
cost of the installation of the water and
sewer trunk line system." [Sec. 9-261(b) City
Code]. similarly, the city does not pay for
required drainage, stormwater improvements
related to private development. There should
be no fiscal impact to the City with respect
parks and recreation since the city requires a
"contriDution to the (recreation) system
proportionate to the magnitude of the new
Subdivision or project", or "require
developers to supplement public recreation by
allocating private parks on a proportional
22
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Checklist for DCA Transmittal
share Dasis consiste with adopted level of
service standards". The City does not pay for
any portion of road development for private
projects~ "
c. Identify the objectives and policies that
support the proposed amendmentj identify any
inconsistencies and explain why there will be
no impact(s) and/or why it is not necessary to
resolve the inconsistencies, if applicable:
In the Recreation and Open Space Element of
the City'S Comprehensive Plan:
Objective D, Policies 1, 2
Objective E, Policy 1
In the sanitary Sewer Sub-Element:
Objective C, policy 9
In the City Code [Sec. 9-261(b)
In the city Code [Sec. 9-151]
d. Capital Improvements Element amendment
submitted in conjunction with regulatory land
use plan map amendment, if required:
(Not Required)
e. Is amendment to the Capital Improvements
Element necessary as a result of the proposed
amendment ?
No.
f. Indicate ability to finance proposed capital
improvement, including forcasting of revenues
and expenditures and projections of debt
service obligations, tax bases, assessment
ratio, other revenue sources, operating cost
considerations, and debt capacity:
Proposed capital improvements relating to
private developments, such as would De
involved in this comprehensive plan amendment,
are all paid up front by the developer.
Therefore, the City does not involve itself
issues of aDility to finance, forcasting of
revenues, etc. for such projects.
23
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Checklist for DCA Transmittal
1l. VACANT LAND CHARACTER ANALYSIS IN ORDER TO
DETERMINE SUITABILITY FOR USE, INCLUDING:
[9J-5.006(2) (b) (c)]
a. Soils.
Basinger, Samsula, and Hontoon soils,
depressional as well as Myakka and EauGallie
fine sands.
b. Topography, including flood prone areas.
Flat to gently rolling hills. There is a
small flood prone area related to Sweetwater
Creek which traverses northward across the
property.
c. Natural resources.
None.
d. Historic resources.
None.
e. Population projections, or revisions, for:
1995; 2000; 2005
1995 - 25,673 (BEBR University of Florida
4/1/95 preliminary Estimate)
1997 - 28,174 (Table TU-T7 Vol. 1 Of 2 city's
Comprehensive Plan)
2010 - 36,653 (Table TU-T7 Vol. 1 Of 2 City'S
Comprehensive Plan)
The 1990 population (U.s. Census) was 22,151.
with the BEBER estimate at 25,673 for 1995,
which closely approximately the City'S
estimate utilizing Duilding permits issued,
then there has been a 15.9% growth. A num};)er
of new large development are now being
proposed along S .R. 434 (now being widened)
towards the newly opened northeast portion of
the beltway (S.R. 417) around Orlando.
The City has very little land vacant for
additional residential development. Much of
24
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Checklist for DCA Transmittal
the remaining vacant land is environmentally
sensitive. The City discourages development
in these areas per Policies 1-8 under
Objective B and Policies 1-6 under Objective C
of the Conservation Element and Policy 3 under
Objective A of Goal 2 of the Land Use Element.
f.
Relationship
(included in
land needed
population:
of amendment to the analysis
9J-5.006(2) (c) of the amount of
to accommodate the projected
The City has very little land vacant for
additional residential development. Much of
the remaining vacant land is environmentally
sensitive. The influence or impact of the
beltway (GreeneWay S.R. 417), economic
conditions, the Orlando area housing market,
and no doubt other exogenous variables have
Deen underestimated at the time of the
formulation of the Future Land Use and Housing
Elements of the adopted Comprehensive Plan.
C. CONSISTENCY OF PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT WITH
THE STATE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: [163.3177(10) (a) F.S.]
NOTE:
A LOCAL (COMPREHENSIVE PLAN) SHALL BE
CONSISTENT WITH A COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL
POLICY PLAN OR THE STATE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IF
THE LOCAL PLAN IS COMPATIBLE WITH AND FURTHERS
SUCH PLANS. [9J-5.021(1) F.A.C.]j
LIST THE APPROPRIATE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES THAT
INDICATE CONSISTENCY WITH THE STATE COMPREHENSIVE. PLAN.
[9J-5.021(4) F.A.C.]
(10) NATURAL SYSTEMS AND RECREATIONAL LANDS
Goal (a) , policy 1, 7, 11, 13
(16) LAND USE
Goal (a) , policy 3, 6,
(18) PUBLIC FACILITIES
policy 1, 3, 4
25
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Checklist for DCA Transmittal
(20) TRANSPORTATION
Policy 13
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Staff Review Board makes the following recommendation:
The Local Planning Agency recommends to the City Commission that
the comprehensive plan amendment concerning the Luther Carroll
property (LG-CPA-2-95) be transmitted to the Florida Department of
Community Affairs for its review and comment.
26
. /
//
P~~e OJ-2L-JL-JOO-008C-0000
See 03 TWP 215 RGE 31E
NW 1/4 o~ NW 1/4 (less S 340 it: of E660 it: (, Rds)
j
)
)
)
1
~
~
S
~
~
~ PZoPCn(
T W F?2l'S-1
.
NORTHEAST'
SEM INO LE C
TVYR20S:RNG.3i E.
HOWARD
- \ -"
~ CLON T S A.J...l r h". ...
h.: ~ GROvES JONES h..: -.. .Cr) I
'Cr) C.E.B MARY 0) Cr) -
IHC. TR. r , F a a.
W MINTER J.O.s. L.W . J.... ~_. . B WHE:&ER S'<:::ES
~'C".EVt.NS
- G AN 0 l' .I r I rlo I
r<J J c, BJ,( .
" OG L::S 1:1
. E.F' w H E E LE R JR.
c.:J 8. F: WHEELER JR J. a c.
Z DONA LD S. DORrs MAL CONJ
a: -
I WEAVER TR.. I
a:j -{ ...
if) A .LlOYD t .. a.ac.
I . . . J(JFER
- J .
C\J o ffi I ... 1
0..: ~ > lJ L~ { fA DONALD B DORI SI- d
3 ~~L5Y . . " WEAVERf'" ....
I w< e Z
003 . O_1I"l Z
t- /. c:: U l../
00 /.1./, ( I . cC: ...J <
~~ I '-' < \j ~
FLOf!!> ~ . . c:l. 0
/ '1
~ '/ .J ~ ./ J ./ ~ / / ./ ./ ./ / / / ././ / ./ /~ J . ..
,
~ 'lj .~ ~ -3 r ,
.... I
-~ v'.J Y I:: <
'.// / Y d. 0 l- e ;- I
'/~ /; /; ".I .J c:: ~ ,
~...J .
~~~I/~ Y -.2, / . . -
'// 1'////'/.~riJ/. J. ( r 1 3: e.. I
II: -.: ,r - ~"" ,. ::.: i"S.GAU.O WAY 8. .
"-~~9 \'\ ~ GROWERS IN C.t:: 1 ANNE lEASE 8-
f "'_ r ,,-
.' . '''I(~~ . f ~ )BARNETT
'"'1 ~w If ~ BAN K TR. CO. .
~ ?E~.AEF. ., I
~~!v L~. ~"\IIIIII/t: \
,\.to- I
( , .,~k: ~BffG1B DOLCINS G. & CH J
r l_v5' , ~~ EOWAR 0 E. 't bllS
.......
:.....~. C.L NIBLACK ~ -1 ~f- ~ Ct:: ;
'"'i'.\ ~PT/(f/'T" ! l;? <:( ~'=' .--;: McREYNQOS ~ BH
::?1 ~ J. &., ~ :z. ~ _ ~ . .
;;"~ J. ~}.l E: . +n-/7'/- ~ <{ .~ ~ BCL
.~ ~. I ,. ./ '<... ~, ~
~ ~ , I l>7 _0 Q: I -:/ . ~ EVA
~" If.i>.tl<l..OSKE '/~ . C> I II '\ i;:n;n)/./77?"/77(/'77~r,
~ ""- IlJ/ - PAlM~~ ~ z
ALLEN B g;-i\r-- - _d
> --~ ~ ~
LLr -- I a:: (f1
EDITH f5 ~-,=L~~ +: "ST. <i Z
OJ
u ~ ~ -, - ;:E<i
S HARU <t ~ V 11 \ ~~~~ 'Q:"n :E aJ
I t- \ .. .. I..J I - -
.l~4--~~~;:~~ :.::~:;;'~~~
~;:v.:,.,-I..l~ ,..:='. ,....:;.:~..:O
..~..:,..rt~., .'J""-- -,~.-
~.f
~:~~ . ..i"~
r~;.\:i.;- >.\ -~/"::.~?
'~4-_':I 5 ~.;.,..; (ti' "'"
~~ It' ~ .~" ~~~~_.~.~ ~
)
:"' -.1-/
~;l:-'.J
. . , 0'" . ..' .... . "... ",.- ....:....~, .;..... . .........:.;.~
\.
. 'v
/
LUTHER CARROLL PROPERTY .
~
~
1;0
'1.
~
'~
tf) >1'
Yp ~\
1,.
~... '0
,.... '>'
.-\
L/}/jL' J);:SUP
~
("
,.~
/
l.!illi'IV llJ. ^ \'
_____~ .""'-0_- _
EXTnnIT n
v
-
i
!
I '
LM<E JESUr>
---------
<" 1.', \!
" ,
-;' ....
"
/-.
~
-------
~
nunAl." I
-'.-
nU/1AL- 'u
nUnAL_
"
nun^L .10
r . .
': L'
~~' , -
rXED SE
. . -
~~ E5i:t>..i6 '
~IOA AYE
COMMERCIAL
Clll-OE.:WJ~pnrHG iI-
----, _II I
~~~:
FUTURE LAND USE.
~ . '." . ..
^PPLlCAHT:..llilZL:!86:-I.O::J::lJ~t~/,(.jlZ. r J-..lK-c, [~~La.~ FtITtmE LAI/D USE
^OlEAGE:.\3,(.., AC..Y.. FnOM: I'l~,~ 10:~~
~SlJU.JE CT rnor>E/1r."... ~'01:..~""L-
ZONING .
S-T-~-21-:J I , 10',2..-I_A,'
r-nOM: A.-3 ......
EXISTIlIO USEiYACAHT I
ZONING
........-~
/---. --
LAKE JESUP . ~
----~
,.----- . A-5
,.----r
A. f 0
'f' .
~
A-I
.;
"
?!
F\.. ""CI~
!We.
~ ~
.'1 PUO --I~
J!f. ;n~~H~{:l:;jhl :1. .
c'lti.::o EJLJ tUEICS v n I It lj s C C"
. I, '_If I I - I '
. ~".11
,',1
~. J:
': .-.
j'
Ji '\\;:-....
,.,
;I) .
" ,':,
I .
':. .
, .
If"": 31"-:1.""1'
t'\~SJ' .-:. "::,.j!
&.:I.i-:., 't.' .
-. ..
(T~'~t'~:F""~T'~7':;:' .
, r..4J:0J'r:r-::..:r...".:., ;i
1.. ~, "':l:lv<';..r-_ .
. -..
'. ~.,
. "
Attachment 2
Henry Dean, Executive Director
. John R. Wehle, Assistant Executive Director
Charles'-r. Myers III, Deputy Assistant Executive Director
"""
lo...:
!'_.(~';;';' .~..l.l. !,~t"';. :.....:;~.:;.'\ :;"f,:..:.'r:J.."?'
!
=.....::
........
\MATER
:;..j MANAGEMENT
'....0 DISTRICT
POST OFFICE BOX 1429
TELEPHONE 904/329-4500
TOO 904/329-4450
FAX (EXECUTIVE/LEGAL) 329-4125
- PALATKA, FLORIDA 32178-1429
SUNCOM 904/860-4500
TOO SUNCOM 860-4450
(PERMITI1NG) 329-4315 (ADMINISTRATlON/ANANCE) 329-4508
FIELD STATIONS
1
618 E. South Street
Orlando. Florida 32801
407/897.4300
TOO 407/897-5960
7775 Bayrneadows Way
Suite 102
Jacksonville. Florida 32256
904/730-6270
TOO 904/730.7900
PERMITTING:
305 East Drive
Melbourne. Florida 32904
4071984-4940
TOO 407/722-5368
OPERATIONS:
2133 N. Wickharn Road
Melbourne. Florida 32935-8109
407/254-1762
TOO 407/253'1203
NOVEMBER 7, 1995
JIECCJElIWJEJI
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
ATTN: JOHN GO~ORUHK
112S E. S.R. 434
WINTER SPKINGS, FL 32703
NOV 2 -1 J9951
CITY OF WINTER SPRINC
. City Manager
SUBJECT: CONSUMPTIV~ USE PER~IT NO. 2-117-Q029NGM2R
ENCLOSED IS YOUR PERMIT AND THE FOR~S NECESSARY FOR SU8~ITTING
INFOR~ATION TO CO~PLY WITH CONDITIONS OF THE PERMIT AS AUTHORIZED
BY THE GOVERNING 80~RD OF THE ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT
DISTRICT ON NOVEM3ER 7, 1995. 8bb_~Q~~hI~~~~_!~fQ8~AIIQ~_~~~!_~g_
~Ye~I!!~Q_IQ_IH~_QI~IB!tI~~_e8LAI~!_QEEI'~L_e~_Q~_~Q~_1~~2~~
e6b!I~!i_fLQEIQ8__~~lZ~:1~Z~. .
PERMIT ISSUANCE DOES NOT RELIEVE YOU FROM THE RESPONSIBILITY OF
OBTAINING PERMITS f~OM ANY FEDERAL, STATE, ANDIOR LOCAL AGENCIES
ASSERTING CONCURRENT JURISDICTION FOR THIS wORK. THE ENCLOSED
PERMIT ~ILL EXPIRE ON NOVEM3ER 7, 2002.
IN THE EV~Nr YOU SELL YOUR
TO THE NEW OWNER IF We ARE
THE RECORDING OF TH~ SALE.
TO MAINTAIN A VALID PER~IT
PROPERTY, TH~ PERMIT WILL BE TRANSFERRED
NOTIFIED BY YOU WITHIN THIRTY DAYS OF
PLEASE ASSIST us IN THIS MATTER SO AS
FOR TH: NEW PROPERTY OWNER.
THE PERMIT ENCLaS~D IS A LE~Al DOCUMENT AND SHOULO BE KEPT WITH
YOUR OTHER IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS. PL~ASE READ THE PERMIT CAREFULLY
SINCE YOU ARE RESPONSI8L~ FOR COMPLIANCE ~rTH ANY PROVISOS WHICH
ARE A PART OF THIS PE~~IT. PROVISO COMPLIANCE IS A LEG~l
REQUIREMENT AND YOUR ASSIST4NCE IN THIS MATTER WILL BE GREATLY
APPRECIATED.
ACCORDING TO CHAPTER 40C-2.401 AND SECTION 6.4 OF THE CON.SUMPTIVE
WATER USE HAND200X, A P2RMANENT TAG WIll SE ISSUED 3Y THE DISTRICT
FOR ~tlL IDeNTIFICATION. THIS TAG IS PRO~INENTLY DISPLAYED AT THE
SITE OF WITHDRAWAL 3Y P=R~A~ENTLY ~FfIX!N6 THE TAG TO THE PUMP,
HEADGAT~, VALVE, ~R OTn~R WITHDRAwAL FACILITY. FAILU~E TO DISPLAY
Patricia T. Harden, CHAIRMAN
SANFORD
William Segal, VICE CHAIRMAN
MAITLAND
Dan Roach, TREASURER
FERNANDINA BEACH
Otis Mason, SECRETARY
ST. AUGUSTINE
Kathy Chinoy
JACKSONVILLE
Griffin A Greene
VERO BEACH
James H. Williams
OCALA
Reid Hughes
DAYTONA BEACH
James T. Swann
COCOA
~
CITY Of WINTER SPRINGS
PAGE TWO
NOVEMBER 7, 1995
A WELL TAG SHALL CONSTITUTE VIOLATION OF A PERMIT CONDITION AND
MAY, If WILLFUL, SE GROUNDS FOR REVOCATIO~ OF THE PERMIT. ?LEASE
REFER TO' YOUR COpy OF 40C-2 IF YOU NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION.
YOU WILL FINO ENCLOSED A COpy OF THE MAP SU3MITTED WITH YOUR
APPLICATION, WITH EACH WELL'S LOCATION AND NUMBER IDENTIFIED. WHEN
PLACING THe TAG ON THE ~ELL, REFER TO THIS MAP TO ENSURE PROPER
WELL IDENTIFICATION.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING YOUR PERMIT COMPLIANCE
INFORMATION, THE ATrACH~D FORMS OR WELL TAGS, CONTACT ME AT 904-
329-4274.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR INTEREST IN OU~ WATER RESOURCES.
ROSIE PARKER, DATA CONTROL TECHNICIAN
DIVISION OF PERMIT DATA SERVICES
ENCLOSURES: PERMIT WITH COMPLI~NCE FOR~S
MAP
WELL TAG{S)
cc: DISTRICT PER~IT FILE
o
ST. JOHNS RIVER WATE; MAr~AGE~ENT DISTRICT
POST OFfICE BOX 142~
PAlATKA, FLORIDA 32173-1429
\
\ PERMIT NO.
~=11 I= QQ~l ~H?~f 3
DATE ISSU~D ~Q~~~~~e _I, 1222
A PER~IT AUTHCRIZIN5:
USE OF GROUND WATER FRO~ TH~ FLORIDAN AQUIF:R TO SU?PlY POT~BLE
WATER TO AN ESTIMAT~D POPULATION OF 15,854 IN 7 YEARS.
lOCATION:
SECTIONS 38/37, TOWNSHIP 20/21 SOUTH, RANGE.3D EAST
SEMINOLE COUNTY .
CITY OF WINTER SP~INGS WEST SERVICE A~EA
ISSUED TO:
(O',.NER)
CITY OF WINTE~ SPRI~GS
1126' E. S.R. 434
WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708
PER~ITTEE AGREES TO HOLD AND SAVE THE ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT
DISTRICT AND ITS SUCCESSORS. HARMLESS FROM ANY A~D ALL DA~AGES, CLAI~S,
ORlIA8ILITIES WHICH MAY ARISE FROM PERMIT ISSUANCE. SAID APPLICATION,
INCLUDING ALL PLANS A~D SPECIfIC~TIONS ATTACHED THERETO, IS BY REFERENCE
MADE A ?ART HER:OF.
THIS PERMIT DO:$ NOT CONVEY TO PERMITTE= ANY PROPERTY RIGHTS NOR ANY
RIGHTS OR PRIVILEGES JTrlER THAN THOSE SPECIfIED HEREIN, NOR RELTEVE THE
PERMITTEE F~OM COMPLYING WITH ANY LAW, R.eGULATION OR REQUIREMENT
AFFECTING THE RIGHTS OF OTH~R BoorES OR AGENCIES. ALL ST~UCTURES AND
WORKS INSTALLED 8Y PERMITTE~ HEREUNDE~ SHALL RE~AIN THE PRO?ERTY OF THE
PERMITTEE.
THIS PERMIT MAY S~ REVOKED, MODIFIED OR TRANSFERRED AT ANY TIME PURSUANT
TO THE APPROPRIATE PROVISIO~S OF CHAPTER 373 OR 403, FLDRIDA ST~TUTES A~O
40(-1, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODES:
PER~IT IS CONDITIONED U?ON:
SEE CONDITIONS ON ATTACHED "EXHIBIT A", DATED NOVEM3ER 7, 1995
AUTHORIZED BY: ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER ~ANAGEMENT DISTRICT
DEPARTMENT Of RESOURCE ~ANA~EME~T
~ .....,..
c/JI! . '. .;... "
. C~1 ~..~.;.;
8 Y : . - .~y-- ". '
V ~(DIREctoR)------T-~-----
JEFF ELL~DGE
(jOV:RNI~. /7
Sy. ~~U~
-----(ASSr--A-- SECRETA~Y)--
;:: ~y D~AN
" E X H IS I T ~. It.
CONDITIONS FOR ISSJA\CE Of P~R~IT NUMBER 2-117-GD29NS~2R
CITY OF ~IMT~R SPRrN~S
C;T=D NOV~M3E:~
7,199';
,1. OJ:STR-~CT AUTHJR!Zi:.D STAfF, UP')N ?xQ?E;';; iDENTIFICATION, WILL
HAV= PE?MIS310N TO =NTER, I~S?ECT A~D 03S~RVE PER~ITT=D A~D
R~LAT~O fACILITI~S IN ORDER To O~rER~IN~ CO~PLIANCE WITH THE
APPROVED PLA~S, S?~C!iICArIONS AND CONDITiONS OF THIS P~R~IT.
2. NOTHING IN THiS P~R~IT SHOULD BE CONSTRUED TO LIMIT T~E
AUTHORITY Of THE ST. JOHNS R!V~R WATE~ ~A~AGE~ENT DISTRICT TO
DECLA~: A WATER SHO~TAGE AND ISSU~ ORO~RS PURSUANT TO SECTION
373.175, FLORIDA STATUTES, OR TO FORMULATE ~ PLAN FOR
IM?LEM~~TATION DU~I~G PERIODS OF WATER SH0RTASE, PURSUANT TO
S~CTION 373.246, FLORIDA STATUTES. 1M TH~ EVENT A WATER
SHO~T~GE, AS DECLAR~D ay THE DISTRICT GJV~P~ING BOARD, THE
P:R~ITTcE MUST ADrlE~E R=DuCTIJNS IN WAT~R wITHDRA~ALS AS
S?EClfI~D BY TH= DISTRICT.
3. P~IOR TO THE CO~STRuCTION, MODIFICATION, ~R ABANDONMENT OF A
WELL, THE PER~ITT~E MUST OBTAIN A W~TEk W~LL CONSTRUCTION
PERMIT FROM THE ST. J~HNS RIV~R WATER ~ANAGEMENT DISTRICT O~
THE A?PROPRIATE LOCAL GOVERNMENT PURSUA~T TO CHAPTER ~OC-3,
FLORIDA AOMINISTR~TIVE COJE. CONSTRUCTION, MODIFICATION, O~
A3ANDONMENT OF A ~ELL WILL RE~UrR: ~ODrFICATION Of THE
CDNSU~PTIVE USE p~R~Ir WHEN SUCH CO~STRUCTION, ~ODIFICATI)N
O~ AaANDO~MENT !S OTH=~ THAN THAT S?~CIFI~O A~D O~SCRleED O~
TriE CONSU~PTIVE USE P=RMIT AP~L!CATrJi FOQM.
4. LEA~ING OR INOPER~TlVE WfLL CASINGS, VAlVES, OR CONTROLS ~UST
BE ~E?AIR~D OR ~E~LAC~D AS REQurR=D TO ELIMINATE THE LEAK OR
MAKE THE SYSTEM f~LLY OPE?ATIONAL.
5. LEGAL USES OF ~ATER ~XISTI~G AT THE TIME JF P~RMIT
APPLICATION MAY NJT 5~ SI~NIFICANTLY ADVE~SELY
I~PACTED 3Y TH~ CJNSU~PTIVE USE. IF UNANTICI?ATEO
SIGNIFICANT A~V~R5~ I~PACTS OCCUR, TH~ DISTRICT SHALL
R~VvKE THe PERMIT IN ~HOL~ OR IN ?A?T TO CURT~IL OR A3ATE
THE ADVERSE I~P~CT5, UNLESS THE IMPACTS C;N BE MITIGATED
BY THE PE~MITTEE.
6. OFF-SITE LAND USES ~XrSTI~G AT TH~ TI~E OF PERMIT
A?PLICATION M~Y NOT s= SI3NIF!C~NTLY ~DVE~SELY !M~ACTcD
AS A RESULT OF TH~ CO~SUM?TrV~ USE. IF U~A~TrCIPATED
SIG~IFICANT ADV~RSi I1PACTS OCCUR, TH~ DIST~ICT SHALL
R~VOKE THE PE~MIT I~ WHOL~ OR I~ ~ART TO CU~TAIL OR A3ATE
T~E ADV~R5E I~P~CTS, ,UNLESS Trl~ r~p~CTS CAN 8E ~ITIGATED
BY THE PE~MITT~~.
2-117-002yN3M2R
7. TH~ DrST~rCT ~UST S~ ~OTIFI:D, IN ~RITING, ~ITHrN 30 DAYS
OF ANY SALE, CO~V~Y'NCE, OR OTH~R T~A~SFER OF A W~LL
O~ FACILITY fROM ~HIC~ TH2 P~~MITTED ca~suMoTIV~ us~
II5 MADE 0~ ~ITHIN 30 DAYS OF ANY TRANSFER OF JW~ERSHI~
o~ CONT~uL JF Trl~ ?~A~ ?RJPc~TY AT WH[CH TH= ~c~~rTTE~
COkSUMPTIVE USE 13 LQ(ftTE~. ALL TRANSF~RS OF O~N~RSHrp
O~ TR~NSFER$ ~F P~R~ITS A~E SUSJECT TO THE ~RJVISIONS OF
S~CTION 4DC-1.612,F.~.C..
8. A DISTRICT-ISSU~D lO~~TIFICAT!ON .TAG SHALL BE P20~INENTLY
DISPLAYED AT EACH ~IT~DRAJAL SIT~ 5Y DERMAN~NTLY AFFIXING
SUCH TAG TO THE Pj~P, HEADGATc, VALVE OR OTHE~ WITHDRAWAL
FACILITY AS PROVIO~O 3Y SECTION 40C-2.401, FLJRI.DA
ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. PER~ITT~E SHALL NQTIFY THE DISTRICT IN
THE EVENT THAT A ~E~LACEMENT TA5 IS N~EDED.
9. IF TH~ PERM;TrE~ DO~S NOT S~RVE A NEW ~~OJECT~O D~MANO
LOCATED ~iTHIN Tn= 5E~VIC~ ~REA UPON ~HrCH TH= AN~UAL
ALLOCATION ~AS CALCULATED, TH~ ANNUAL ALLOCATIO~
WILL SE SU3JECT TO ~O~IFICATIJN.
10. THE P=RMITTEE MuST =NSURE THAi ALL S~RvrCE CO~NcCTIJNS AR: ~ETERE~.
11. LANDSCAPE IRRIGATIO~ IS PROHI~rTEO 3ETW€E~ THE HOURS JF
10:00 A.M. ANO 4:00 P.~., EXC~PT ~s FOLLOdS:
A. IR~IGATIaN USING A M:CRO-I~RIGATIO~ SYST~M IS
ALLOwED 4~YTrM~.
~. TH~ US~ OF RECLAIMeD wATER FJR I~RI6~TION IS ALLOWED
ANYTIM=, PROVIDE) AP?ROPRrAT~ SIGNS AR= ?LAC:D O~ TH~
PROP=RTY TO INfO~M THE GEN~RAl PUFLIC AND DISTRICT
ENFO~CEM~NT ?ERS)NNEL OF SUCH USE. SUCH SIG~S MUST BE I~
ACCORDANCE wITH ~OCAL RESTqICTIO~S.
C. IRRIGATION OF, O~ IN P~E?ARATION FOR PLA~TIN6, NEW
LANDSCAPE IS AlL1~EO ANY T!M~ OF DAY FOR ONE 30 OAY
PE~IOD p~OVr)~D LRRISATION IS LI~IT~~ TO THE A~OUNT
NECESSARY fO? PLANT ~STA~LISHM~NT.
~. ~ATEriI~G I~ OF CriE~ICALS, INCLUDING INSECTICIDES,
P~STICIO=S, FcRTILIZ~R3, FUNGICIDES, AND H~R31CI~ES wH~N
REQUIR:D 8Y LAw, THE M~NUFACTURER, OR dEST M~N~GEMENT
?RACTICE3 IS ALLOWED ANYTIME WITHIN 24 HOURS OF APPLICATION.
E. IRRIGATION SYSTE~S MAY 8E OPERAT~D ANYTI~E FJR
~AINrENA~CE AND ~EPA!R PURPOSES NOT TO ExceED TE~
~INUT~S ?~R ~GUR PER ION:.
2-117-0J29/1i:.ir-'~F
12. TREAT~D EfFLu~NT ~UST ~E JS~O AS Ik~IG~TIJ~ W'TER WHE~ IT
E~CO~~S AVA!LASlE, ~CJ~CM~CALLY ~~ASI~L~, AND P~R~ISSI9LE
U~D~~ A?PlrCA3L~ ST~T~ A~~ F~OERAL STATUT~S O~ REGULATIONS
P~O~ULGAr~D T~ESEJN0E~.
13. PER~IrT~~ MUST ~NTE~ INTO A CJ~TR~CT 0ITH EXI~TrN6 AND ~E~
CUSTO~ERS R~gUI~ING T~E~ TO INSTALL WAT~R C~NSERVING DEVICE~
O~ SHuwER H~ADS, FAJC:TS ANa n~T~R CLGS~TS. FOR =XIsrING
USE~S TH~ WATER CON3ERVIN~ c~vrCES MUST ~E INSTALLED AITHIN
ONE YEA~ OF ISSUA~CE OF PER~Ir. NE~ US~RS MUST HAVE rHES~
D~vrc~s INSTALL~O AT TH~ rI~E OF CJNSTRUCTI~N IN ACCORDANCE
WITH SU3S~CTION 553.14, F.S. NEW CONNECTIONS WILL NOr 9E
ALlGw~O UNL~SS THcS= DEVICES A?~ INSTALLED.
14. ALL SUBMITTALS ~ADE TO DE~ONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WIT~ THIS
PER M I T it; U S T r '" C L U D = T-j E C L1 P N J M ~ E ~ -2 - 11 7 - 0 02 9 p LA I N L Y
lA.EEL:.D.
15. THIS PE~MIT WILL ~X?I~E 7 Y~ARS f~O~ THE DATE OF ISSUANCE.
16. M~XIMUM ANNUAL GROUND WATER wrT~DRAwALS MUST ~OT =XCEED T~E
F v l L 0 I...'I :~ G :
575.7 rILLION GALLC"tS HJ 1995;
5?8.6 MILLI-:JN Gi:.LlO:\!S IN 1996;
624.2 MILLION G~L~O,\jS IN 1997 ;
638.8 r"IlLI;)N G."'. L '- :) ,'J S 1.... 1998;
660.7 MILLION G ~ L l 0 ;'~ S IN 1999;
632.6 r. :r: L L r 'J t~ G~.LLO:.jS IN ZO:JO;
71J~.1 MILLION iJ.A.LLO"lS IN 20D1.
17. MAXIMUM DAILY G~OJNO ~ATE~ WITHDRAW~LS ~UST NaT EXCEE~ THE
FOlLO"jING:
2. y'} :HLlION GALL.JNS IN 1 ~9.5;
3.11 iiI L L I ():'t GALLONS !N 1~9c;
3.25 ;"lILLION GALLONS IN 1 'J 97 ;
.3.33 ."'! ILL I C ~i GALLO'lS IN 199.': ;
3.45 ;V;ILLICN GALLJN5 IN 1:;9;;;
3.57 l"1IllI(j_~ GALLJNS IN 2JOO;
3.71 :H II I o ,If GALLONS IN 2-)01.
18. T~E PERMITTEE MUST CONDUCT AN AQUIFE~ P~RFORMANC~ TEST (A~T)
O~ WELL NO. 6 PRI)R TJ THE WELL 8~rNG PLACED IN S~RVICE. A
PROPOSED 4-INCH DIA~ETER '~~LL ALSO WILL B~ CONSTRUCTEO A
DISTANCE JF APP20XI~ArELY 50 FEET FRO~ TH~ WE~L NO. 6 ANO
WIll 8E USED AS A~ JBS~~VATIC~ WelL D~)~rNG THE APT. THE APT
MUST ~E CONDUCT~D l~ AccdROANCE WITH AP?2~CIX H OF TH~
CON5U~?TIV~ USE PCR~IT AP~LICANT S ~ANDdOCK AND AS DESCRI~EO
I~ THE CrTY S SU3~ITT~LS OATEJ JU~E 28, 1995 ~ND
SU2SE~U~NTlY ~~VIS~D ON S~PTE18~R 22, 1995. ~ DETAILED
2-117-0~2~NjM2~
REPORT GN T~~ AfT MUST 6: SuB~rTTcD ~ITrlI~ 30 D~YS OF
COM?L~TIO~ UF THE A~T, AN) ~UST I~ClU)~ ALL D~TA <INCLUOI~G
R~CORDED FI~L0 ~ATA ON DISKS) COLLECT~D DURrN~ THE APT, AHD
D~TAILEJ CALCULAT[ONS O~ OCCU~ENT~TION 1F MOD~LS USED TO
REDUCE THE FI~LD DATA AND TO ~.ET~p~rN~ A0UIFE~ ?RJPERTIES
SUCH ~S T~A~S~ISSIVITY (T), HYD~A~LIC CO~0UCTIVITY (K), A~D
STORAGE COEFF1(IE~T (5). ALL DATA COLL~CT~D DUR!N3 THE
PRO?OSED ST~?-D;A~DJW~ T~STS ~UST ~LSO Sf S0S~ITTED.
19. A WATER SAMPLE F~JM W~LL NOS. 5 AND 6 MUST 8E COLLECT~O
(FOLLOWING A PUMPIN~ PERIOD) IN MAY OF 1997 A~D 2300, AND
A~ALYZED ~y -A CcRfIFI:D LA80R~T3FY FO~ ~AJOR IO~S INCLUDING
PH, TEM?ERATUkE, CONDUCTA~CE, CALCIUM, MAGN~SIUM, POTASSIUM,
CHLORID~S, SULFAT~S AND TOTAL ALKALINITY. FROM TOTAL
ALKALINITY, a!CAR30~ATE A~D CARBONATE ION CJNCENT~ATIONS
S~OuLO 6E CALCULATED. CATION-A~ION 3ALANCE S~OULD 8E LESS
T~AN 5~ ERROR. T~c L~3 R=S~LTS SHALL 2~ SU3~ITT~O TO THE
OfSTRrCT iITHI~ 3J D~YS OF SA1PLE COLLECTION.
~o. THE 'PE~MITT~E MJSr IM?LEM~NT THE wATER CONS~RVATION PL~N
SUBMrrTiD TO TH~ DIST~!CT O~ ~AY 1~ 1995 AND SU~PLE~E~TED ON
JUNE 29, 19~5 AND S€PTEMBER 22, 1995 IN ACCOR'ANC= 41TH T~E
SCHEDULES CONTAIN~D T~EF.EIN. T~= P~R~ITTEE MuST ~AINTAIN A
lOG OF TriOSE ACTIVITIES CJMPLET~D AS PART OF THE ?LAN. A
R:PORT, DETAIL!NG T~E PROGR:SS Or PLA~ I~PLEM:NTArION MUST
tiE SU3MITT~D To THE DISTRICT IN O~ ~EFCRE MAY 1, 1999 OR
UPON MODIFICATI0N, '~HrCrlEVEq ~ATE IS SOON~R.
21. 8Y JU~E 1, 1996 T~~ ~~~~ITTEE ~UST I~?LEM~NT rH~ ~ATEq
CONSE2VATiON RATe STF.0CTUQE P2ESENT~D 10 THE ~I5TRICT IN THE
SEPTEMSER 22, 1995 SU~MITrAL.
22. A wATER AUDIT OF THe SYSTEM MUST ~E P~RFORMED A~D SUB~ITTcD
TO TH~ DIST~lCT aY DECEMe~R1, 1998. IF THE AUDIT INDICATES
A GREATER THAN 10.0Y.-UNACCOUNTED WATER LOSS, THE CITY WILL
bE R~~UIRcD TO OEV~LO~ A LEAK DETECTION PROGRAM THAT .~UST BE
I~PLE~ENT~D 2Y ~AY 1, 1999.'
23. THe PERMITTeE MUST SU~MIT T~E ?:SULTS OF A REUS= FE~SI8!LITY
STUDY FOR T~E EAST AN) ~EST S~RVICE ARc~S TO THe ~I5TRICT 8Y
M~RCH 1, 1996. Trtc ~~SUlrs OF THIS STUDY A~E SU3JECT T~
DISTRICT AP?R0VAL.
24. W=LL NCS. 3, 4, 5 AND 6, AS LISTED ON THE AP?LICATION, ~UST
CONTINUE TO BE MONITO~~D ~ITH TOTALIZING FLOW~ETERS. THESE
M~T~RS ~U~T MAI~TAIN ~S% ACCU~ACY, 3E VERIFIA~LE, AND EE
INSTALL~D ACC~RDl~G T0 TH~ MANUFACTURER S S?~CIFICATIDNS.
25. P~IOR TO 3EGIN~IN; JS~GE ~F TriE PR0POS~O ~ELL No.6, THE
W~LL ~UST EE ~QUI~PEO WITH A TOTALIZI~G FLO~~~T~R. THIS
M~T~R ~~ST ~A!NTAIN 95% ACCUR~CY, SE VE~IFIA8LE A~D BE
2-117-0J2YNG~2R
I~srALLiD ACC~RDI~6 TO Th~ ~A~UFACTURfR'S S?ECIFICATION5.
D)CU~ENTATI~N (I.:. 0~~UfACTU~=q'S S?~C!FrCATro~s A~D A
PrlorOJ CF ThE PRO?ER [NST~LLATIJN OF THIS M~T~R MUST 3E
~JBMrTTED T0 TH~ DIST~rCT WIT~:~I 30 D~~S OF IiSTALLATION.
26. TOTAL W!TrlD~A~ALS F~O~ ~E~L NOS. 3, 4, 5 AND 6 ~UST ?~
RECORDED CONTI~UOJSLY, TCfALE0 ~ONT~lY, A~O REPORTED TO T~E
DIST~ICT AT LEAST ~V~~Y SIX MJNT~S F~O~ THE I~ITI~TIO~ OF
THE MONITuRI~G usrN~ ~iSTRICT FORM NO. ~N-50. THE RE~ORTING
DATES EACn YEAR ~rLL ~E AS FOLLOwS fOR TH~ OUQATION OF TH~
p~RMlr:
REPORTING PeRIOD
JANUA~Y - JUN~
JULY - DEC~~B~R
QEP02T DUE DATE
JULY 31
JA~U;RY 31
27. THE PER~lTTEE ~usr ~AI~TA[N A~L ~~TERS. I~ CASE ~F FA!LUR~
O~ a~EA~DJWN OF A~Y M~T~R, TH~ DISTRICT MUST SE NOTIFIED IN
WRITI~G WIT~IN 5 ~AYS OF ITS DISCOVERY. A DEF~CTIVE ~ETER
MUST ~~ REPAi~tO OR F.~PLACEv WITHIN 30 OAYS OF ITS
DISCOVERY.
28. THE PERMITTEE ~UST ~AVE ALL. FLC~METE~S CH=CKE~ FOR ACCU~ACY
ONCE 2VERY 3 YEARS JITHIN 30 DAYS Of TH~ ~NNIVERSARY DATE OF
PeRMIT ISSUA~Cc, AND ,ECALI~RATcD IF THE DIFFERENCE B~T~EEN
T~E ACTUAL FLOw A~O THE ~=T=R ~EADING IS GREATEq THAN 5%.
DISTRICT FOR~ NJ. E~-31 MUST ~~ SUS~ITT~D TO THE- DISTRICT
WITHI~ 10 D4YS OF T~~ I~S~ECTIO~I CALr~RATIaN.
19. SJURCE CLASSIFICATIDN IS 100% (70R.10 ~GY) FR~~ THE C)NFI~ED
O~ 3E~!-CvNFINED AQUIFeR.
30. USE CLASSIFICATION IS 76% (540.20 MGY) HOUSEHOL~ TYPE USE,
A~D 15% {105.S5 M;Y} COMM~RCI~L/INDUSTRIAL TYPE USE, ~ITH
ESSENTIAL us~ (fI~E P~OTECTrO~) AND WAT~R UTILITY NOT TO
EXCE:O 9X (62.0S ~GY) CF fHE TCTAL VOLU~E PU~DED.
,.--
!
Attachment ~.';~. )(ip toc:k-Q...c..!.~
ConkJlt., ~orter and Holmes
-. ENGINEERS) INC.
a 1104 E. R081NSON STflEET
@ ~ ORLANDO. FlORIDA 32801-2092
P TEL 407-425-0452
FAX '407-648-1036
September 22, 1995
st. Johns River Water Management District
618 E. South street
Orlando, Florida 32801
Attention: Sara Garrett, P.G.
RE: Consumptive Use Permit Application No. 2-117-0029 ANGM2R.
City of Winter Springs, Seminole County Request for
Additional Information
CPH Project No. W0446.00
Dear Ms. Garrett:
Following is.a response to your letter of July 31, 1995, requesting
addi tional information for the above-referenced project. Our
responses retain the same format and numbering system as received
in this and prior correspondence.
Item 2
A. Conservation Rate structure
The City staff agrees to' prepare an ordinance for passage by the
City Commission which would lower the first block level to 10,000
gallons and would be based on the following table:
Capacity
(1,000 Gallons)
Charge
($/l,OOO Gallons)
o - 10
0.91
10 - 15
1.25
15 - 20
1.50
20 - 25
1.75
25 - 30
2.00
Over 30
2.50
(
(I'
For irrigation only, the following schedule would:apply:
capacity
(l,OOO Gallons)
Charqe
($/1,000 Gallons)
0-5
1.25 -
5 - 10
1.50
10 - 15
l.75
15 - 20
2.00
Over 20
2.50
We believe the implementation of the above rate items are in
conformance with your requirements.
B. Xeriscape
specific Condition No. 11 requires the permittee to use native
vegetation that needs little supplemental irrigation within the
project service area. The permittee, i. e., the city of winter
springs, complies with this requirement. This is enforced through
the Development Review Committee of which the utility Director is
a member. City projects are not approved until all items and
departments are satisfied with the plan. During construction the
landscaping items are 'enforced by the Building Department and after
construction is complete, the City has a Code Enforcement
Board/Officer which takes over responsibility for enforcing the
requirements of the City Code.
Please note that the City is also planning on adopting a xeriscape
ordinance (previously submitted to SJRWMD) which would cover all
new construction within the City of winter springs. It is intended
that adoption will occur by April 1, 1996. Enforcement will remain
the same as described above.
The city will also commit to the construction of axe rise ape
demonstration site in a median on Moss Road.
C. Installation of Water Savina Devices
The ultra low volume devices shown in the SJRWMD Water Conservation
Plan Form are identical to the requirements of the Standard
Building Code which is used by the City of winter springs.
Therefore we believe we are in compliance with your requirements.
Attachment 4
Potable Water Section
GOAL
~
Provide an adequate public supply, treatment, and distribution of
potable water for the city of Winter Springs.
OBJECTIVE
A) Winter Springs shall require that the following policies,
which establish level of service standards, which are met when
planning capital improvements and reviewing applications for
development approval.
Policies
1) Winter Springs adopts the following level of service
standards for annual average daily volume in gallons of
potable water per capita for the City owned system:
Current LOS
143 GCPD
Interim LOS (1995)
125 GCPD
Future LOS (1997)
115 GCPD
For the other potable water providers, the following
levels of service are adopted:
Seminole Pines
100 GCPD
Seminole County
100 GCPD
Casselberry
125 GCPD
2) Winter Springs shall require an Application for Service
to the Utili ties Department for connection to public
potable water system for all proposed projects within the
service areas.
3) Facilities for providing a minimum fire flow rate of 500
gallons per minute for residential areas and 1250 gallons
per minute for commercial, industrial and institutional
areas, shall be required as a condition of development
approval.
4) Winter Springs shall require the connection to the City
system and installation of a public water system.
5) Winter Springs may require the developer to provide and
dedicate to the City the public water distribution system
within any new development. The design criteria and
April 27, 1992
51