HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 833 Interim Services Fee
RESOLUTION NO. 833
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA,
PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN INTERIM SERVICES
FEE; REPLEALING RESOLUTION NO. 808; PROVIDING FOR
CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, has
determined the need for Interim Service Fees, and;
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, has
by the adoption of Ordinance No. 527, directed that it is necessary to set the Interim Services
Fees by resolution,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA, THAT:
SECTION I - Resolution No. 808, passed and adopted December 9, 1996, is
hereby repealed in its entirety.
SECTION II - The following fee schedule for Interim Service Fees is adopted as
being the official Interim Service Fee Schedule for the City of Winter Springs, Florida;
Month C.O. Issued Residential* HotellMotel** Non-Residential***
January $145.68 $ 158.42 $ 186.38
February $ 133.54 $ 145.22 $ 170.85
March $ 121.40 $ 132.02 $155.31
April $ 109.26 $ 118.82 $ 139.78
May $ 97.12 $ 105.61 $ 124.25
June $ 84.98 $ 92.41 $ 108.72
July $ 72.84 $ 79.21 $ 93.19
August $ 60.70 $ 66.01 $ 77.66
September $ 48.56 $ 52.81 $ 62.13
October $ 36.42 $ 39.61 $ 46.59
November $ 24.28 $ 26.40 $ 31.06
December $ 12.14 $ 13.20 $ 15.53
* per dwelling unit
** 85 percent of total HotellMotel units.
*** per 1000 square feet
SECTION III - This Resolution shall remain in force and effect until supplemented,
amended, repealed or otherwise altered.
SECTION IV - All Resolutions or parts of Resolutions in conflict with this Resolution
are hereby repealed.
SECTION V - Upon its passage and approval, this Resolution shall be effective,
January 01, 1998.
tt-
Passed and adopted this JL day of~ 1997
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
ATTEST:
~~.~
CITY CLERK
wp\Bldg\resoI833.11-10-97
'-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WINTER
SPRINGS, FLORIDA, RELATING TO CO:M~MUNlTY REDEVELOPMENT;
CONCURRING WITH A COMMUNITY REDEVELOP:MENT PLAN
PURSUANT TO SECTION 163.360, FLORIDA STATUTES; PROVIDING FOR
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Seminole County, Florida,
(the "Board"), as the governing body of Seminole County, Florida, a charter county (the
"County"), in its Resolution 97-R-120 adopted on May 28, 1997, expressly found the
existence of one or more blighted areas within the corporate limits of the City of Winter
Springs, Florida (the "City") and the unincorporated area or the County as such area was
described therein and as describ~t!., in Exhibit "A" hereof (the "Community
Redevelopment Area"), and detennined that the rehabilitation., conservation., or
redevelopment, or a combination thereot: of the Community Redevelopment Area is
necessary and is in the best interest of the public health, safety, morals, or welfare of the
residents of the County; and
WHEREAS, the Board adopted Resolution. 97-R-130 on June 24, 1997, which
established and created the United States Highway 17-92 Corridor Community
Redevelopment Agency of Seminole County, Florida (the "Community Redevelopment
Agency"), appointed the members of the governing body of the Community
Redevelopment Agency, authorized the Community Redevelopment Agency to exercise
powers under Part ill) Chapter 163, Florida Statutes) as amended (the "Redevelopment
Act") within the Community Redevelopment Area pursuant to Section 163,410, Florida
Statutes, and established and designated the Community Redevelopment Area as the area
of operation of the Community Redevelopment Agency; and
WHEREAS, a study of the Community Redevelopment Area and a plan for the
redevelopment of the Community Redevelopment Area have been undertaken and
completed in accordance with Section 163.360, Florida Statutes; and
WHEREAS, the Community Redevelopment Agency received the proposed
community redevelopment plan and referred it to the Local Planning Agency of Seminole
County, in accordance with Section 163.360 (3), Florida Statutes, and the Local Planning
Agency, after reviewing the proposed plan, has determined the plan is consistent with the
County's comprehensive plan and returned the proposed community redevelopment plan
to the Community Redevelopment Agency with its recommendations; and
WHEREAS, the Community Redevelopment Agency will consider the
proposed conununity redevelopment plan for its adoption and transmittal to the Board on
November 25, 1997; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners will consider the proposed
community redevelopment plan at a public hearing on December 16, 1997 and has proposed
such community redevelopment plan to the local governing authority of the City Commission of
the City, the governing body of the City and in accordance with Section 163.356 (1) of the Act;
and
WHEREAS, it is appropriate and necessary in order to proceed further with the
redevelopment of that part of the Community Redevelopment Area that lies within the City of
Winter Springs, in accordance with the Redevelopment Act, that the Community Redevelopment
Plan for the Community Redevelopment Area be concurred in by the City Commission in
accordance with Section 163.356(1), of the Act.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA:
1. The City Commission does hereby find that:
(a) There has been prepared for redevelopment of the Community Redevelopment Area,
pursuant to and consistent with Section 163.360 of the Act the document entitled United
States Highway 17-92 Corridor Community Redevelopment Plan, prepared by County
staff and Ivey, Harris & Walls, Inc., the County's planning consultant and for
consideration by the Community Redevelopment Agency on November 25, 1997, a copy
of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and made a part hereof (the "Plan"), and
(b) The City Commission has reviewed the Plan in accordance with the provisions and
requirements of the Act.
2. The City Commission does hereby expressly determine that it is appropriate, proper, and
timely that the Plan be concurred in at this time in order that the provisions of the Act and any
and all resolutions, ordinances and laws implementing the Plan may be utilized to further
redevelopment within that part of the Community Redevelopment Area that lies within the City
of Winter Springs. Therefore, the City Commission does hereby concur in the Plan.
3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
4. Five certified copies of this Resolution shall be provided to the County Manager by the City
Clerk.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS,
FLORIDA, TIllS ~Y~DAY OF -;~ ~
MAYOR PAu.L R
JrS~t --
A : _____
ity ~Clerk /-
Re2ular Meetin2 City Commission
November 24.1997
97-98-04
Pa2e 5
Mayor Partyka called a recess at 8:35 p.m. Mayor Partyka reconvened the Regular Meeting at 8:47
p.m.
City Manager
G. Requesting the City Commission hear from Mr. Steve Cooke, Executive Director of the
Orlando/Sanford Airport Authority, regarding airport improvements and related realignment of
runways. PURPOSE: to request the City Commission to hear from Mr. Steve Cooke, Executive
Director of the Orlando/Sanford Airport Authority regarding future improvements to the airport and
related realignment of runway landing patterns that could have negative impacts on the City of Winter
Springs. and to ask for appropriate Commission direction:
Mr. Steve Cooke gave his presentation.
Commissioners Langellotti and Conniff mentioned complaints they have received regarding noise
from planes.
Motion was made by Commissioner Blake to authorize the City Manager to write a letter
sating that the City is opposed to the north/south runway expansion. Seconded by
Commissioner Conniff. Discussion. Vote: Commissioner Blake: aye; Commissioner
Langellotti: aye; Commi<E!<E!'"'' -,. ConnitT: aye; Commissioner Gennell: aye; Commissioner
McLeod: aye. Motion pa -;>
munity Developw ,It
.'~ equesting thr ..sion consider a Resolution of Support for the Seminole County
'l~'6mmunity Reo, Agency's proposed U.S. 17/92 Corridor Community Redevelopment
Plan. PURPOSE: ~luest the Commission approve a Resolution of Support for the Seminole
County Community H.edevelopment Agency's (CRA) proposed U.S. 17/92 Corridor Community
Redevelopment Plan. The Board of County Commissioners requests input from the various cities
affected by the CRA's proposed plan:
Mr. Kevin Fall, Capital Programs Planner with Seminole County, gave his presentation.
Attorney Guthrie explained to the Mayor and Commission tax increment financing.
<..' '. .':' ",1,,;:"
Motion. !as madelll(Jo~is~ioner ConnitT to approve a. J!~9h.t.iq'.9(,~:~lJe~~~:J~~ J~~
S~minole .Co"'I!!t,,_~JDl~,);I,l~~eveI9P~~~t.~.~9~Y'$,. proposed u.s. 17/92 Corridor'
Community Redev~...ent Plan. Seconded by Commissioner Blake.~Discussion. Vote:
Commissioner McLeod: aye; Commissioner Gennell: aye; Commissioner Langellotti: aye;
Commissioner Blake: aye; Commissioner ConnitT: aye. ~__.
Commissioner McLeod asked that the Commission gets a list of the thirty+ properties in Winter
Springs.
Manager McLemore stated that he believes that the City should try to work with the County with
everything they do and stated he thinks the County needs to work with the City on the things the City
is asking them to do.
Motion was made by Commissioner Blake to have the Mayor write a letter to the County
asking for continued cooperation and flexibility between the City and County. Seconded by
Commissioner McLeod. Discussion. Vote: Commissioner Gennell: aye; Commissioner
\.,.
Rel!:Ular Meeting City Commission
November 24. 1997
97-98-04
Page 6
Langellotti: aye; Commissioner Conniff: aye; Commissioner Blake: aye; Commissioner
McLeod: aye. Motion passes.
Engineering Division, Community Development Department
C. Requesting Commission final action (approval or disapproval) on the engineering of five (5)
tloodway lots on the west side of Howell Creek. This project is known as The Reserve at Tuscawilla,
Phase I-A. PURPOSE: to request the Commission to take final action on the engineering plans for
five (5) floodway lots on the west side of Howell Creek. This project is known as The Reserve at
Tuscawilla, Phase I-A and the lots are located in that subdivision known as The Reserve at Tuscawilla
Phase I which is on the east side of Tuscora Drive:
Mayor Partyka stated that the developer has told him that there has been some discussion between
the residents and they have reached a compromise on some of the issues.
Mr. Carrington gave his presentation, and stated for the record, that a letter from FEMA is necessary
before building permits can be issued. Mr. Carrington mentioned that Mark Jenkins, City Engineer
is present for technical questions and Mr. Curt Wilkinson, of Rich land Properties, Dwight Saathoff,
Attorney for the developer and David Hamstra, Engineer were present for questions.
Manager McLemore said for the record, the City has been dealing with this project for over a year
and said he personally had some problems with this project and because of that the City has required
this firm to go through some "hoops" that is normally not required to go through. One was to
provide the funding for the City to hire a third party engineer to do the environmental monitoring of
the entire water course to ensure that the information the City was getting from the consultant's
engineers was in fact the best information that Staff could bring to the Commission. That process
has worked to the result that the third party consultant (employed by the City) is in agreement now
with the consultant, in terms of the actual outcomes of the model.
Attorney Guthrie stated that this issue isn't in the normal course of things, with the tloodway
regulations and FEMA review etc., so we do have a little room and a little opportunity to have some
input.
Mr. Saathoff gave his presentation. Mr. Saathoff said with regard to the homeowners questions;
their proposal was to make the cost associated with the monitoring and maintenance of their
encroachment in the tloodway a common area expense, that would be an item to be maintained by
the homeowners association for the entire project. Mr. Saathoff said the concerns of the homeowners
is being responsible for something that really doesn't look to them as being a part of their lots and
homes. We talked to them (earlier) about making this a general expense of the association but
capping on all but the five new lots, the assessment being no more than $2.00 per month, to the
extend that the cost associated with the monitoring and maintenance of the encroachment in the
floodway were to exceed the amount of revenue generated with that cap, then the five lot owners
would have to make up that difference.
Mark Queen, 129 Cherry Creek Circle, stated that there was a proposal made to the homeowners,
essentially paying an extra $2.00 per month in dues to the homeowners association, provided this
meets the City specifications; Mr. Queen stated that from the people he has spoken with tonight, they
are in agreement to this.
Paul Stanifer, 117 Cherry Creek Circle, stated that the assurance the homeowners need in this issue