HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 527 Interim Services Fees
ORDINANCE NO. 527
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA,
RELATING TO INTERIM SERVICES FEES: CREATING ARTICLE XI,
CHAPTER 6 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES; ESTABLISHING
AUTHORITY; MAKING FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS: PROVIDING
FOR DEFINITIONS: PROVIDING FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF AN INTERIM
SERVICES FEE; PROVIDING FOR CALCULATION OF
SERVICES FEE AND ADOPTING A FEE SCHEDULE; PROVL
EXEMPTIONS; PROVIDING FOR COLLECTION OF INTERIM SERVICES
FEES; PROHIBITING THE ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY
UNTIL PAYMENT OF THE INTERIM SERVICES FEE; PROVIDING FOR AN
INTERIM SERVICES FEE FUND; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY;
CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, The City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida,
finds it in the public interest to provide an interim service fee;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I - Short title. this Ordinance shall be known and may be
cited as the "Interim Services Fee".
SECTION II - A new Article XI, Chapter 6 of the Code of Ordinances
of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, is hereby adopted and reads as
follows:
Article XI. Interim Services Fee
Sec. 6-250. Authority
The City has the authority to adopt this Ordinance pursuant to
Article VIII of the Constitution of the State of Florida, Chapter
166, Florida Statutes.
Sec. 6-251. Findings and Determinations
It is hereby found, determined and declared as follows:
(1) The costs of providing the specified municipal services (as
defined herein) exceed the fees charged for such services and consequently
those costs are borne in large part through ad valorem taxation.
(2) From the time a new structure is compl eted and occupied unti I
the structure is included on the ad valorem tax rolls as of the ensuing
January 1, the City provides the specified municipal services and other
direct services for which it receives no compensation.
(3) The demand for additional municipal services lncreases with the
development of real property located in the City and the subsequent occupancy
of structures located thereon and the existing fiscal structure of the City
is insufficient to meet the ever increasing demands for municipal services
imposed upon the City by such new development.
1
(4) The implementation of an interim services fee to defray the
costs to the City of providing the specified municipal services to newly
improved property prior to the imposition of ad valorem taxes on such
improvements is in the best interests of the citizens and residents of the
City of Winter Springs and reflects the City's desire for fiscal management.
(5) The interim services fee imposed by this Chapter is not in any
manner, directly or indirectly, intended as an ad valorem tax, nor is the
amount of the fee established herein related in any way to the valuation of
the property receiving the specified municipal services.
Sec. 6-252. Definitions.
The following words when used herein shall have the meanings
indicated, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:
"Owner" shall mean the person or legal entity reflected in
the public records of Seminole County, Florida, as the fee
simple title holder of real property upon which a structure
has been completed.
"Specified municipal services" shall mean and be limited to
the following municipal services provided by the City:
public safety, code enforcement, engineering, parks and
recreation, street maintenance, and building maintenance
(excluding building maintenance on general services
functions) .
"Structure" shall mean any building or improvements
constructed upon real property located within the corporate
limits of the City for which a certificate of occupancy is
required, either permanent or temporary, for the full or
partial use thereof.
Sec. 6-253. Establishment of Interim Services Fee.
Except as set forth in Sec. 6-255 hereof, an interim services fee lS
hereby imposed upon every structure located within the City fram the date of
issuance of a certificate of occupancy for such structure through December 31
of that year.
Section. 6-254. Calculation of Interim Services Fee.
(a) The fee schedule shall be based upon the cost of providing the
specified municipal services to the structures subject to the interim
services fee fram the date of issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy through
December 31, of that year, less anticipated franchise fees, utility taxes,
fines and forfeitures, charges for services and other revenues fram user-
based fees.
The initial interim services fees and all changes thereto shall
be by separate Resolution passed by the City Commission.
Fee schedule shall
2
be reviewed annually be the City Commission to make such revisions as are
consistent with the findings and determinations set forth in Section 6-251
hereof and the uses of the interim services fees set forth ln Section 6-258
hereof.
(b) Notwithstanding the fee schedule set forth in Sec. 6-254(a),
the minimum interim services fee charged shall be Ten Dollars ($10.00).
(c) The interim services fee for residential structures shall be
calculated on a per dwelling unit basis.
The interim services fee for new hotel and motel structures shall be calculated on a per roam basis. The
interim services fee for all non-residential structures shall be calculated
on the basis of a cost per one thousand (1,000) gross square feet or gross
leasable square feet, or portion thereof.
(d) The building official shall be responsible for calculating the
applicable interim services fee and determining the fee category into which a
structure should be placed. If a structure does not clearly fit into a fee
category set forth in Sec. 6-254(a) then the building official shall place
such structure in the fee category which he deems to be the most consistent
with the purposes of this Chapter.
Sec. 6-255. Exemptions.
The interim services fees shall not be imposed upon:
(1) structures requiring a certificate of occupancy solely for
change of use of said structure.
(2) Remodeling or additions to structures (such as swimming pools
and fences) which do not result in a net increase in gross square footage.
(3) Maintenance and repairs.
(4) Any structure owned by governmental units and used for
governmental purposes, or governmentally owned structures which are leased to
an organization which uses the structure solely for tax-exempt purposes.
Sec. 6-256. Collection of Interim Services Fee.
The interim services fee shall be paid by the owner of the real
property prior to the lssuance of a certificate of occupancy, for any
structure located on the owner's real property. The building official shall
be charged with the responsibility for collection of the interim services
fees.
Upon request for a certificate of occupancy, the building official
shall issue a statement of the interim services fee due and payable for the
3
structure in question. Such fee statement shall be presented to the owner of
the real property on which such structure is located and shall be collected
by the building official prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
In the event a person other than the owner pays the interim services fee,
then the owner shall be discharged from all further obligatiorili here-under to
the City and the person paying such interim services fee on behalf of the
owner shall not subsequently be entitled to a refund thereof.
Sec. 6-257. Issuance of certificates of Occupancy.
No certificate of occupancy, shall be issued for any structure, or
portion thereof, unless and until the interim services fee required by this
Chapter has been paid.
Sec. 6-258. Interim Services Fee Fund.
(a) The interim services fees collected by the City pursuant to
this Chapter shall be kept separated from other revenue of the City and paid
into a proprietary fund which is hereby created, to be known as the "Interim
Services Fee Fund". Such fund shall be used exclusively for the purposes of
providing the
specified municipal services for the benefit of those
structures upon which the interim services fee has been imposed and
collected.
(b) The city manager shall provide the City commission with
recommendations for expenditure of monies from the Interim Services Fee Fund
during the annual budget process.
(c) Any funds on deposit in the Interim Services Fee Fund which are
not immediately necessary for expenditure pursuant to this Chapter shall be
invested in interest bearing accounts. All income derived shall be deposited
in the Interim Services Fee Fund. OWners shall not receive a credit for or
be entitled to interest from the investment of funds.
(d) Any funds on deposit in the Interim Services Fee Fund which are
not expended or encunbered six (6) years from the date the interim services
fee was paid shall, upon application of the feepayer and proof of payment, be
returrled with interest at the rate of six percent (6%) per annum from the
date of payment.
SECTION III - Severability.
If any section, subsection, sentence,
clause, or phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held
unconstitutional or invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction such
4
portion shall be deemed a separate distinct and independent provision and
such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion thereto.
SECTION IV - Conflicts. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances
in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.
SECTION V - Effective date. That this ordinance shall take effect
immediately upon its final passage and adoption.
Passed and adopted this 14th day of September, 1992.
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
PHILIP A. KULBES, MAYOR
ATTEST:
Mary t. Norton
CITY CLERK
First Reading August 10, 1992
Posted August 14, 1992
Second Reading and Public Hearing September 14, 1992
5
MEMO: 5/28/92
TO: CITY MANAGER
FROM: BUILDING OFFICIAL
RE: EXPECTED INTERIM SERVICE FEE REVENUE
Presently we have 58 new houses under construction and these should be
completed at a rate of 8 per month. Our estimate for next year is 16
new starts per month and normal time for completion is 6-8 months.
Assuming this Ordinance could be in effect by August 1, 1992, we should
realize approximately $15,000 on this by the end 01 next fiscal year.
This is no huge amount I realize, but these are bleak times and if
construction should pick up to normal, this could double. It is that
much we would not have otherwise.
RECEIVED MAY 29, 1992
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
CITY MANAGER
INTRODUCTION
This study of Interim Service Fees for the City of Winter Springs
presents the methodology utilized to develop the fees, summarizes the
data incorporated as the basis for the fees, and describes the
calculation of the fees.
Sound fiscal management is the key not only in a city where growth is
continual but most especially where growth is rapid and where such
changes in population create an even more rapidly urbanizing community
with sharp increases in the costs of providing services.
The Capital Improvements Element of the Comprehensive Plan requires
that the public facilities and services needed to support development
must be in place concurrent with the impact of the development. The
adopted ordinances and accompanying studies for the various impact fees
have established levels of service even in areas not covered by the
comprehensive planning process. These fees are only for the necessary
capital improvements and do not provide a mechanism for paying the
increased operating costs.
The logic behind the adoption of an interim services fee is to collect
funds to pay for services provided to development not yet on the tax
rolls and not fully paying for services. December 31 of a given year
is the deadline for adding improved properties to that year's tax roll.
Since ad valorem taxes are paid in arrears, it can be as much as a year
before property values increase and an additional ten months before any
payment is made.
There is, however, the immediate increased demand for police, fire,
public works, code enforcement, and recreation services. The existing
fiscal capacity is insufficient to meet this ever increasing demand.
This fee is proposed to meet the demand for operating expenditures for
services.
To satisfy legal criteria, the fee is designed with a direct link
between the payment of the fee and the benefit received. The costs for
the services are clearly identified. The funds collected from the
interim services fee are to be placed in a special fund and are not to
be included in the general revenue fund. The fee is to be charged at
the time of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy (C.O.) and the
amount of the fee is discounted by time of payment. The fee is
discounted because the City is collecting the fee before the services
are actually provided and thus will be holding money in advance of
expenditures.
Interim services fees are currently being charged by five other
municipalities. These are City of Miami, City of Largo, City of Ocoee,
Orlando, and City of Oakland Park. Their methodologies are different
in approach as well as complexity. Much of this study is a replication
of the Oakland Park methodology as its current ordinance is based upon
court rulings against Oakland Park's original ordinances. Within the
judgement against Oakland Park, guidelines for the development of these
fees were set.
1
In ruling against the city of Oakland Park, the court stated that the
City did not:
* show need for service or improvements;
* establish a definitive plan for the
improvements;
* establish a relationship between need and
cost;
* earmark expenditures to benefit the
payees;
* provide for a refund agreement; nor
* provide for a time frame of expenditure
of fees.
Under the initial ordinance passed by the City, Ordiilance 0-84-3, the
Court ruled that the fees were instead taxes because:
* they were based on the value of new
construction;
* the basis for the fees were not shown to
offset needs due to growth;
* the funds were not earmarked but placed
in the general fund; and
* the fees were not uniformly imposed,
i.e., the same properties that were
exempted fram the interim services fee
were also exempted fram ad valorem
taxation.
Under the second ordinance passed by the City, Ordinance 0-86-6, the
court ruled that the fees were instead taxes because:
* the basis of the fees were not shown to
offset needs fram growth;
* the funds were not sufficiently
earmarked;
* the tax class was without adequate
remedy; and
* the fees were not uniformly imposed,
i.e., the same properties that were
exempt fram the interim services fee were
also exempt fram ad valorem taxation.
The review of the legal issues regarding the concept of an interim
services fee indicates that such a fee could be implemented if it ;s
directly linked to the cost of service and the benefit to the payer can
be shown. The recommended interim services fee is therefore to be
applied to those improved properties which have been identified as
generating expenditures for services for which there are inadequate
offsetting revenues.
As noted previously, interim services fees are separate and distinct
fram impact fees for capital facilities. However, the criteria for
impact fees for capital facilities, established by the courts through
the years, is extremely useful for the establishment of an interim
2
services fees model.
The development of impact fees must meet three tests:
(1) Fair share rule (who pays and how much);
(2) Nexus of benefit rule (where and how the
fee can be used);
(3) Credit rule (appropriate reduction
against the fee).
The fair share rule provides that fees can be charged only for the
portion of the cost that is attributable to new growth. These fees
cannot be charged to pay for the cost of reducing or eliminating
deficiencies in existing facilities. Within this broad rule, specific
guidance is given in several areas: it is permitted to distinguish
among different types of growth in establishing fee amounts (i.e.,
residential, non-residential, etc.); fee-payers should be able to pay a
smaller fee if they can demonstrate that their development will have
less impact than is presumed in the fee schedule; costs of facilities
that will be used by new growth and existing users must be apportioned
between the two groups in determining the amount of the fee.
The nexus of benefit rules require the government to show a reasonable
connection (1) between the need for public facilities and the growth
from the fee-paying develoment, and (2) between the expenditure of fee
revenue and the benefits received by the fee-paying develo~nt. These
two conditions limit where and when fees can be collected and used.
Where possible, there should be a geographical relationship, but there
is not specific limit on the distance between a fee-paying development
and a public facility. Furthermore, the fee revenue must be expended
within a reasonable period of time, but there is no single maximum
limit that applies to all fee expenditures. Explicit limitations on
the expenditures of fees must be adequate to guide government
personnel, and fee revenue must be earmarked for specific uses.
The credit rules allow a fee-payer to have fees reduced to reflect (1)
contributions that meet the same need as the fee, and (2) future
payments of taxes that would ordinarily be used for public facilities.
The court cases and legislation do not prohibit the credits. In
particular, the government should require that the quality of a
donation should conform to adopted standards, or at the least be
comparable to similar City Facilities. The government should also
require a rational nexus or benefit between a contribution and the fee-
paying property which receives a credit. Finally, the amount of any
credit should not exceed the amount of the fee that is being offset by
the credit.
Utilizing these criteria, the interim services fee for the city will be
based on the following:
(1) Based upon actual expenditures for service
provision related directly to population and type
of land uses, not on value of property or
improvements;
3
(2) Based upon the specific identifiable municipal
service needs created by improvements, not
including general government service expenditures
or capital facilities need;
(3) Charged to all improved properties which receive
City services where offsetting revenues are
inadequate;
(4) Credited for future payments of other revenue
sources such as franchise fees, utility taxes,
charges for services, fines and forfeitures, sales
taxes, and other revenues from user-based fees;
(5) Credited for those improved properties which are
evaluated as not having created an expanditure
shortfall as a result of service provision;
(6) Deposited into a special fund, not in the general
fund.
4
METHODOLOGY
In establishing the fees (1) actual service expenses, (2) the current
methods of payment, and, (3) the proportion of services demanded by
residential vs non-residential were analyzed. The cost of serving
existing developed properties is used as the basis for determining the
fee that future development will be assessed. The term "interim" is
used because the fee is to be charged for the period of time when an
improved property is creating expenditures for services but not fully
paying for those services.
When an improved property becomes a user of City services, the City
realizes an increased demand for expenditures. Generally, this occurs
when the improved property is occupied, or shortly after the time a
certificate of occupancy is issued. Expenses accrued by the provision
of services exceed the amount of revenues collected frum property which
is still being taxed at its unimproved or vacant land value. What is
identified here is the discounted amount that would be appropriate to
charge for services until such time as the excess expenditures no
longer exist.
The interim fee is based on actual proportional expenditures for
services for residential and non-residential categories. The cost of
providing general government services is excluded as are the costs of
capital facilities and costs supported by enterprise operations. Only
the proportional share of expenditures that are not met through other
forms of payment are calculated. Table 1 represents the general fund
over the last five years as well as the estimated revenues for fiscal
year 1992.
The services which are included in the calculation of the interim
services fee are police, fire, public works (excluding building
maintenance), code enforcement, and recreation services. Table 2 shows
the costs of these services over the last five years as well as the
requested budget for fiscal year 1992.
Table 3 indicated the services as they have been demanded in the past
by residential and non-residential actual calls for service or usages.
Calls for service exclude mutual aid, accidents, or false alarms; calls
for code enforcement include all calls whether the problems were
resolved by an inspector's visit or through the Code Enforcement Board.
Since non-residential land uses do not directly create demand for parks
and recreational services, these expenditures were only assigned to
residential. Public Works has been divided by the proportion of the
City acreage in each category.
5
TABLE 1
GENERAL FUND REVENUES FY 86-87 THRU 91-92
YEAR PROPERTY TAX OTHER REVENUE SOURCES TOTALS*
86-87 577,613 21% 2,125,472 79% 2,703,085
87-88 653,787 21% 2,406,978 79% 3,060,765
88-89 879,832 24% 2,744,401 76% 3,624,?33
89-90 1,548,680 34% 2,965,762 66% 4,514,442
90-91 2,072,591 41% 3,014,091 59% 5,086,682
91-92 2,298,186 41% 3,278,902 59% 5,577,088
* EXCLUDES FUND BALANCE
,.
6
TABLE 2
(continued)
PUBLIC WORKS
PERSONAL
YEAR SERVICES OPERATING TOTAL
86-87 325,033 249,540 574,573
87-88 338,308 218,740 557,048
88-89 380,947 252,760 633,707
89-90 440,641 251 ,660 692,301
90-91 504,287 275,160 779,447
91-92 561,890 319,860 881,750
RECREATION
PERSONAL
YEAR SERVICES OPERATING TOTAL
86-87 40,460 18,970 59,430
87-88 43,155 21,775 64,930
88-89 52,353 33,875 86,228
89-90 83,875 36,390 120,265
90-91 103,134 33,140 136,274
91-92 224,843 161,528 386,371
"
8
DEPARTMENT
Police
Fire/Paramedics
Public Works
Recreation
TABLE 3
CALLS FOR SERVICE BY LAND USE CATEGORY
RESIDENTIAL
70%
79%
80%
100%
NON-RESIDENTIAL
30%
21%
20%
-0-
9
As an example of how service demand increases wich the increase in
population, Table 4 has been developed. Excluding mutual aid,
accidents, or false alarms, there has been a 19% increase in Fire/EMS
calls for service during the first six months of 1991 over the same
time period in 1990. These are tabulations of calls within the city
limits only. Because of move-ups, the City remains covered even when a
unit has been called out.
Levels of services included within the following calculation of interim
services fees and listed previously with corresponding budgets require
not only the capital expenditures for the necessary equipment but also
personnel to handle the additional demand. The annual review in each
of the respective impact fees require analysis of the need, areas of
demand, and the relationship of capital capacities/facilities to
continuing service levels. Operating costs must increase also to
maintain capital requirements and these levels of services.
While Code Enforcement does not have a corresponding impact fee, it
does offer a service in helping to maintain public health safety, and
welfare to a growing community.
10
TABLE 4
FIRE CALLS
JANUARY THROUGH DECEMBER 1990
continued
WINTER SPRINGS FIRE DEPARTMENT
1990 EMS CALLS
JAN. FEB. MAR. APR. MAY JUN.
Residential 53 34 51 41 39 47
Non-residential 3 2 4 5 4
Unclassified 19 14 26 22 22 19
- - -
TOTAL 75 49 79 67 66 70
JUL. AUG. SEP. OCT. NOV. DEC.
Residential 45 48 49 45 49 52
Non-residential 3 3 3 2
Unclassified 9 15 26 19 16 12
- - -
TOTAL 57 66 76 67 66 66
1991 EMS CALLS
JAN. FEB. MAR. APR. MAY JUN.
Residential 39 55 58 42 37 44
Non-residential 2 3 5 6 0 2
Unclassified 15 10 18 23 16 14
TOTAL 56 68 81 71 53 60
"
JUL. AUG. SEP. OCT. NOV. DEC.
Residential 41 40 46 36 52 51
Non-residential 5 4 2 8 4 4
Unclassified 21 23 13 22 15 16
TOTAL 67 67 67 66 71 71
12
CALCULATION OF FEES
The interim services fees have been calculated according to two
categories: residential and non-residential. Residential includes 1990
census total housing units plus Certificates of Occupancy since April
1, 1990. The designated proportion of the Fiscal Year 1992 budget of
each service has been figured for a total cost of residential services.
Credits for other revenue sources are applied. Since services fee
payment is in advance of services, a discount of 4.5% has been figured.
Non-residential begins with the gross square footage so delineated on
the current property rolls. This total will be the Fiscal year 1992
tax base and, as such, represents the present demand for services. All
other processes are the same as that utilized in the residential
calculations.
13
CALCULATION OF FEES
RESIDENTIAL
Number of Residential Units
Police Services @ 70%
Fire Services @ 79%
Paramedics @ 79%
Public Works @ 80%
Recreation @ 100%
Total Expenditures
Credit for 59% non-ad valorem
Net Expenditures
Cost of Services Per Unit
Discount for Payment @ 4.5%
8,705
1,257,047
870,733
215,799
705,400
386,371
3,435,350
2,026,856
1,408,494
$ 161.80
$ 154.52
14
CALCULATION OF FEES
NON-RESIDENTIAL
Total Square Footage
1,880,590
Police Services @ 30%
538, 735
Fire Services @ 21%
231,461
Net Expenditures for Service
57,364
176,350
1,003,910
592,306
411,604
Paramedics @ 21%
Public Works @ 20%
Total Expenditures
Credit for 59% Non-ad valorem
Cost of Services per 1,000
square foot
Discount for Payment @ 4.5%
$ 218.87
$ 209.02
15
RESULTS
Table 5 lists the suggested fee schedule for collection of the interim
services fees. The fees are calculated based upon the categories:
residential and non-residential. Because hotel/motel is a land use
that may be argued to be in either of these two separate and distinct
categories, it is recommended that hotel/motel be charged by the
residential calculation but adjusted by the average local occupancy
rate of 74.7%. Its transient characteristic allows such treatment.
Fees vary by month and are to be collected at the time of issuance of
Certificate of Occupancy. Since payment is in advance of services, the
fee has been discounted based upon the short term rate the City would
earn from short term investments.
The average cost for residential is $83.69 for non-residential, it is
$113.20; and hotel/motel average is $62.55. It is recommended that a
minimum fee of $10.00 be established.
16
TABLE 5
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
INTERIM SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE
MONTH C.O. ISSUED RESIDENTIAL* HOTEL/MOTEL** NON-RESIDENTIAL***
January 154.52 115.43 209.02
February 141.64 105.81 191.60
March 128.76 96.19 174.18
Apr i 1 115.88 86.57 156.76
May 103.00 76.95 139.34
June 90.13 67.33 121.92
July 77.25 57.71 104.30
August 64.38 48.09 87.08
Septarber 51.50 38.47 69.66
CYctober 38.63 28.85 52.25
Novarber 25.75 19.23 34.83
Decaroer 12.88 10.00 17 .42
* per dwelling unit
** per unit by occupancy rate (74.7%)
*** per 1,000 square feet
17
-..
RESOLUTION NO. 688
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA,
PROVIDING FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF AN INTERIM SERVICES
FEE; CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs,
Florida, has determined the need for Interim Service Fees, and
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs,
Florida, has by the adoption of Ordinance No.
directed that it is
necessary to set the Interim Services Fees by resolution,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA, THAT:
SECTION I - the following fee schedule for Interim Service Fees
is adopted as being the official Interim Service Fee Schedule for the City of
Winter Springs, Florida:
Month C.O. Issued Residential* Hotel/Motel** Non-Residential***
January 154.52 115.43 209.02
February 141.64 105.81 191. 60
March 128.76 96.19 174.18
April 115.88 86.57 156.76
May 103.00 76.95 139.34
June 90.13 67.33 121. 92
July 77 .25 57.71 104.30
August 64.38 48.09 87.08
September 51. 50 38.47 69.66
October 38.63 28.85 52.25
November 25.75 19.23 34.83
December 12.88 10.00 17.42
* per dwelling unit
** per unit by occupancy rate (74.7%)
*** per 1,000 square feet
SECTION II _ This Resolution shall remain in force and effect until
supplemented, amended, repealed or otherwise altered.
SECTION III _ All Resolutions or parts of Resolutions in conflict
with this Resolution are hereby repealed.
SECTION IV _ This Resolution shall take immediate effect upon its
passage and approval.
Passed and adopted this 28th day of September, 1992.
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
PHILIP A. KULBES, MAYOR
ATTEST:
Mary T. Norton
CITY CLERK
----------------------------
TheOrlando Sentinel
Pubiished Daily'
$55.85
~tatt of jflortba } 5.5.
COUNTY OF ORANGE
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared mIA NiT AP(V~ 1\ Nfl
, who on oath say's
that he/she is the Legal Advertising Representative of The Or1ando Sentinel, a dally
newspaper published at CASS.FIRFRRV in
;FMINm F County, Florida;
that the attached copy of advertisement, being a NOIIC E OF pUBLIC ti::ARING
inthematterof nRn.~C:;?7
in the SEMINCll E
was published in said newspaper in the issue; of 08/23/92
Court,
Affiant further says that the said Orlando Sentinel is a newspaper published at
CASSELBERRY , in said
SEMINOLE County, Florida,
and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in
said (j,FM TNflI f County, Florida,
each Week Day and has been entered as second-class mail matter at the post
office in r ASSFlBFRr(Y in said
SFMTNm f County, Florida,
for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached
copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he/she has neither paid
nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate,
commission or refund for the purpose of securi,ng this dvertisement for
publication in the said newsp
The foregoing instrument was ackno d.ged before me this 2 day of
who is :~:~y kno~~;o ~e ~~~ whi!~mlr~~~X'^~
~l' ~. LL{~ .
'I"~' ,'\H:R (ili~ /
(SEAL)
~nlq,.-; ,t~ i",;"~,,f.''''()
NotlH) P"hh.. >ni'ilf' {}f Florida
Jl,ff eRmmjq~jtm p~ tif' , August 28. 1"-'
~mmi@~i(m * eC042971
NOTICE OF PUBUC HEARING
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN by the City
Commission of the City of Winter
~ngs. Florida, that said Commission
WIll hold a Public Hearing on an ordI-
nance entitled as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 527
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA. RE-
LATING TO INTERIM SERVICES
FEES; CREATING ARTICLE XI,
CHAPTER 6 OF THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES; ESTABUSHING AU-
THORITY; MAKING ANDINGS AND
DETERMINATIONS; PROVIDING
FOR DEFINITIONS; PROVIDING
FOR ESTABUSHMENT OF AN IN-
TERIM SERVICES FEE; PROVID-
ING FOR CALCULATION OF THE
INTERIM SERVICES FEE AND
ADOPTING A FEE SCHEDULE;
PROVIDING FOR EXEMPTIONS;
PROVIDING FOR COLLECTION OF
INTERIM SERVICES FEES; PRO-
HIBITING THE ISSUANCE OF CER-.
TIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY UN-
TIL PAYMENT OF THE INTERIM
SERVICES FEE; PROVIDING FOR
AN INTERIM SERVICES FEE
FUND: PROVIDING FOR SEVER-
ABlUTY. CONFI,JCTS ANtI EFFie-
TI\IE DA'M.
This PubIie HeIrinD llIlit. '* .'.7:30
p.m. en hIM"""- ........ as
soon........ _ ,....... ~ .. .Com-
missiOll 0IIIIIltllIr, .CIlr.... H.,East
S. R. 434. WinlIf .... Fl. ~.
Copi.. d .. ~ ...,.. are
availalille in .. .. III IN .0IIr Clerk
for inll!feCllon. Interested parties may
appear at this heering and be heard
with respect 10 this proPosed ordinance.
Persons are advised that if thay deCide
to appeal any decision made at this
meeting. thay will need a record of the
proceedings and for such purpose, they
may need 10 ensure that a verbetim re-
cord of the proceedings is made which
record includes the testimony and evi-
dence upon which the appeal is 10 be
based per Section 286.0105 Florida
Statutes. .
Dated this 23rd day of August.1992.
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS.
FLOAIOA
/s/ Mary T. Norton
Mary T. Norton
City Clerk
SLS8H61005 Au!L23.1992