The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1997 04 24 CALNO Communication Tower Technical Committee Final Report 1 CALNO COMMUNICATION TOWER TECHNICAL COMMITTEE FINAL REPORT (Draft) April 24, 1997 411 CALNO COMMUNICATION TOWER TECHNICAL COMMITTEE REPORT (DRAFT) 4/16/97 BACKGROUND As a result of the increasing number of applications for telecommunication tower locations, CALNO members unanimously voted to request that each city manager and the county manager assign a planner to participate in a committee to meet, in association with industry representatives, to minimize future tower locations within the county and cities. The Sanford City Commission further directed City staff to initiate and coordinate this committee recommended by CALNO. As a result, Sanford has hosted several Communication Tower Technical Committee meetings with representatives of the cities, the county and telecommunications industry. A list of participants is included in this report A summary of each meeting is outlined below. Maps and matrixes prepared by the local governments and the industry representatives are included. MEETINGS October 24, 1996 Local governments were requested to bring copies of adopted and/or proposed communication tower ordinances. Existing inventory information was also requested in order to review the existing distribution of towers. The City of Sanford presented maps of the communication tower locations within the City and adjacent unincorporated areas along with a detailed inventory. Discussion ensued regarding separation of towers from one another in regards to "antenna farms" versus dispersed siting. It was agreed upon that the City of Sanford would prepare a communication tower regulation matrix for the next meeting which would include the adopted and/or proposed communication tower standards prepared by the local governments. The telecommunication industry representatives were also requested to furnish existing plans and /or master plans in map form for the next meeting. December 12, 1996 The Committee reviewed the communication tower regulation matrix (attached) and were asked to submit additions, changes or corrections at the next meeting. Discussion focused on separation requirements and distinction between types of towers. Industry maps and inventories of existing communication towers were submitted by PrimeCo, BellSouth Mobility, APT and Bright Star Tower and Consulting Inc. The committee discussed the idea of master plans or future plans for tower locations. It was generally agreed upon by the industry representatives that future site locations would not be identified either due to market competition or that they simply could not predict future sites until their cell networks progressed. After discussion regarding industry master plans, it was requested that both the industry representatives and local governments prepare maps and /or information outlining the areas that they think would be appropriate or would like communication towers to be placed, for example in utility easements, parks, industrial sites, etc.. In addition, members were requested to document locational characteristics of desirable tower locations as well. Discussions continued regarding the issue of colocation. Industry representatives added that government "holdups" and technological problems have made colocating difficult. They also suggested that some companies have to "build out" their network before colocating. Leasing existing sites from governments has also been difficult, according to the industry because there are no standardized lease provisions. The Committee discussed the Interlocal Agreement between Seminole County and the cities and agreed that a provision for communication towers should be included in so far as notification to adjacent jurisdictions. January 16, 1997 The City of Altamonte Springs, Sanford and Oviedo presented maps and information regarding potential communication tower locations (attached). The City of Lake Mary submitted a list of acceptable general locations and standards for towers (attached). The Committee discussed the information provided by the cities in regard to potential tower locations. The concept of clustering towers (antenna farms) and dispersing towers "porcupine effect") through separation requirements was debated with no consensus on this issue. It was generally acceptable to the Committee for towers to be located in utility easements, substations, some vacant lands and industrial lands. The City of Longwood representative submitted a revised draft of the Interlocal Agreement containing a provision for communication towers and updated routing list. No general consensus was reached on this issue. Industry representatives were requested to develop tower locational criteria in the form of a matrix or report including standards and placement/siting criteria. February 20, 1997 Industry representatives from BellSouth Mobility, PrimeCo and NextWave submitted information and matrices on communication tower standards. The Committee discussed some inconsistencies regarding separation requirements between different a 4 types of residential uses, in particular, a shorter separation requirement for mobile homes and high density multi family use. The Committee requested that a comprehensive county -wide map be prepared showing all the communication tower locations and/or permitted and conditional use areas. It was directed to Seminole County to prepare such map. (Note: Seminole County GIS services has prepared a map depicting permitted and conditional use zones for communication towers in unincorporated Seminole County and is available for review at Seminole County Land Management). CONCLUSION The main purpose of the CALNO Communication Tower Technical Committee was to insure, at minimum, that all jurisdictions in Seminole County communicated with each other and the telecommunication industry in a timely manner in regard to the proliferation and locations of communication towers. At this point, most of the jurisdictions in the county have adopted or have proposed communication tower ordinances. Typically, the ordinances contain provisions for tower to tower separation, tower separation from residential land uses, permitted and conditional use zones, coloration and other aesthetic considerations such as landscaping, height, lighting and color standards. The ordinances, albeit similar to each other in many regards, are customized to each city and therefore a uniform ordinance for the entire county containing identical regulations is not 411 considered to be feasible at this time. Recommend that Seminole County Land Management be designated as a repository and clearinghouse for county -wide telecommunication information. In addition, a single map that contains all the existing communication towers in the cities and county should be compiled. The City of Sanford Department of Engineering and Planning is willing to compile such a map if digital data is supplied based on the county parcel map. Ongoing coordination will be required by the cities and county to accomplish this effort. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Committee membership list Attachment B: Local government regulation matrix Attachment C: Industry prepared criteria and standards PrimeCo, BellSouth Mobility, NextWave Attachment D: Industry Maps /Inventory of existing communication towers PrimeCo, Bell South Mobility, APT Bright Star Attachment E: Maps /Criteria of permitted areas for communication towers City of Oviedo, City of Sanford, City of Altamonte Springs City of Lake Mary (criteria only) ATTACHM A Membership List I CALNO Communication Tower Technical Committee Members Name Organization Phone Fax M ichelle Matrick Foley and Lardner Law Firm 423-7656 648 -1743 Michael Totten NextWave 786 -7768 786 -9307 Dale Finnochi NextWave 786 -8920 786 -9308 John Ariale PrimeCo 423 -8480 843 -0553 Bill Geisler Bright Star 699 -0336 699 -0336 John Groenendaal City of longwood 263 -2553 263 -2336 Susan McGregor City of Oviedo 977 -6040 977 -6033 John Sember City of Altamonte Springs 830 -3966 263 -3773 Carl Gosline City of Longwood 260 -3468 263 -2336 Matt West City of lake Mary 324 -3042 324 -3064 Bruce King Cypress Real Estate Services (AT &T) 667 -5690 875 -2482 Ben Tucker Bell South Mobility 829 -6806 333 -2314 Jim Brege Bell South Mobility 829 -6801 333 -2314 Don Bulden Bell South Mobility 829 -6802 333 -2314 Bob Sirianni APT 851 -3700 859 -8619 Teri Bowley City of Casselberry 263 -3916 260 -1849 Cindy Gennell CALNO Chair, Winter Springs Commission 327 -1800 327 -6912 David Moon City of Oviedo 977 -6040 977 -6033 John Brock City of Longwood 263 -2553 263 -2336 John Dwyer Seminole County 321 -1130 328 -3239 Don Fischer Seminole County 321 -1130 328 -3239 Ginny Markley Seminole County 321 -1130 328 -3239 Thomas Grimms City of Winter Springs 327 -1800 327 -6912 Jay Marder City of Sanford 330 -5670 330 -5666 III Andrew Van Gaale City of Sanford 330 -5672 330 -5666 I ATTACHMENT B Local Government Regulation Matrix Communica ower Matrix (For Informatiurposes Only) S Prepared by City of Sanford Department of Engineering and Planning 11/19/96 Separation From Separation From Antennas Mounted Conditional /Special Separation Between Maximum Landscaping Fencing Jurisdiction Permitted Uses Exception Uses Towers Single- Family Multi Family Height on Existing Requirements Req's. Abandonment Residential Residential Structures Conditional use in some lattice lattice= 5,000' commercial zones, multi- lattice guyed= 5,000' A row of 8' canopy 8' chain link Camouflage or family, agriculture and lattice monopole( >75') 1,500' Must not exceed more trees at 10' apart; monopoles p ermitted in public lands. lattice and left ce -mon p ole( <75') =750' 200' or 300% of the tower than 20' 200' or 300 of the fence or above the 24' continuous Seminole County tower height, whichever None wall w/ 180 days industrial zones and guyed towers >200' are guyed monopole( >75') 1,500' height, whichever is greater highest point of the hedge;evergreen some commercial zones conditional use in guyed monopole( <75') =750' is greater structure xeriscape or barbed industrial and some >75'monopole- monopole 1,500' irrigated Wire top commercial zones <75'monopole- monopole =750' lattice lattice= 5,000' All towers are permitted in Lattice towers are not lattice guyed= 5,000' A row of 8' canopy 8' chain link industrial districts but permitted in residential lattice- monopole(>75')= 1,500' Must not exceed more trees at 10' apart; 100' or 100% of the fence or must adhere to separation districts; monopoles and lattice- monopole(<75') =750' 200' or 300% of the tower than 20' above the 30' continuous Orange County tower height, whichever 300' wall w/ 180 days distances from residential guyed towers require guyed- monopole(>75')= 1,500' height, whichever is greater highest point of the hedge;evergreen areas and other towers in special exception approval guyed monopole( <75') =750' is greater structure xeriscape or barbed irrigated Wire top non industrial districts in residential districts >75'monopole- monopole 1,500' g <75'monopole- monopole =750' Conditional use in water lattice lattice= 5,000' sewer treatment plants, lattice guyed= 5,000' public sports stadiums, lattice- monopole(>75')= 1,500' Must be located a min. of 8' trees at 25' 200' or 300% of the chain link public utility and service lattice- monopole( <75') =750' 200' or 300% of the tower 10' from roof edge; not to apart; 30" Altamonte Springs None tower height, whichever 200' fence or 180 days structures, very light guyed- monopole(>75')= 1,500' height, whichever is greater exceed 40% over bldg. continuous hedge; ,,gall industrial zones, guyed- monopole(<75') =750' is greater height evergreen variety institutional zones and >75'monopole- monopole 1,500' mixed office industrial <75'monopole- monopole =750' lattice- lattice= 5,000' lattice guyed= 5,000 Vinyl Conditional Use in lattice- monopole(>75')= 1,500' Set back 10' from edge of 14' canopy trees at coated 8' 100' or 100% of the 1 y Y Permitted in industrial commercial planned lattice•monopole( <75') =750' 200' or 300% of the tower roof and not to exceed 20' 25' apart; 30' chain link 180 Days Casselber tower height, whichever 200' zones mixed -use, public servive guyed monopole( >75') 1,500' height, whichever is greater above structure or 20% of continuous hedge; fence or is greater and multi family zones guyed monopole( <75') =750' building height evergreen variety wall >75'monopole- monopole =l 500' <75'monopole- monopole =750' Monopoles are Permitted Conditonal Use in Monopole <50' =330' Vinyl Monopole <50' 200' 660' 8' in all zoning districts commercial, industrial, non Monopole <50' 150' provided that structure es. PUD and city -owned Monopole <100' 50' 660' Monopole 50'•100' =330' Set back 15 from edge of C onsistent with city chain link Lake Mary does not exceed land when exceeds height Monopole <100' 100' 1,320' Monopole 101, -150' =660' Same as Single Family 200' roof and not to exceed 15' code fence 200' 2,640' Days established height limitations of that zoning Monopole <100 200 2,640 Monopole 151'- 200'= 1,320' above structure (black) or limitations district Monopole <200' 100' 2,640' wall Monopole <200' 200' 5,280' A row of 8' trees at Vinyl Conditional Use in Set back 10' from edge of 10' apart; 30' coated 8 200' or 300% of the Permitted in industrial commercial, agriculture, 200' or 300% of the tower roof and not to exceed 20' continuous Sanford None tower height, whichever None chain link 180 Days zones mixed -use and multi family height, whichever is greater above structure or 20% of hedge;evergreen fence or zones is greater building height xeriscape or irrigated wall A row of 8' trees at 8' chain link Monopole or stealth Must not exceed more 10' apart; 30" fence or Winter Springs permitted in industial, lattice and guyed towers than 20' above the continuous wall Days 180 Da public buildings, utility require special exception 2000' 500' 500' 180' Y (Proposed) installations and in the permitted areas highest point of the hedge;evergreen (barbed structure xeriscape or wire top recreation sites >10 acres irrigated optional) Longwood Communication towers are permitted as conditional uses Oviedo Odinance is currently being prepared i 0 ATTACHMENT C Industry Criteria/Standards PrimeCo BellSouth Mobility NextWave III 11 c 647. Communication Tower Land Use Matrix Proposal Land Use Governmental Scrutiny Requirements Heavy Industrial Permitted Use Antenna Attachments: No Limitations. Towers: Residential Separation of 200 feet. Light Industrial Permitted Use Antenna Attachments: No Limitations. Towers: Residential Separation of 200 feet. Warehousing Permitted Use Antenna Attachments: No Limitations. Towers: Residential Separation of 200 feet. Heavy Commercial Conditional Use Antenna Attachments: No Group 1 Limitations. Towers: Residential Separation of 200 feet. Highway Commercial Conditional Use Antenna Attachments: No Group 1 Limitations. Towers: Residential Separation of 200 feet. Retail Commercial Conditional Use Antenna Attachments: No Group 2 Limitations. Towers: Residential Separation of 200 feet. Neighborhood Commercial Special Exception Antenna Attachments: No Limitations. Towers: Residential Separation of 250 feet. Office Conditional Use Antenna Attachments: No Group 2 Limitations. Towers: Residential Separation of 250 feet. Professional Office Special Exception Antenna Attachments: Subject to Site Plan Review Towers: Residential Separation 300% height of tower. Mixed Use Conditional Use Antenna Attachments: No Group 2 Limitations. Towers: Residential Separation of 200 feet. Office- Residential Conditional Use Antenna Attachments: No Group 2 Limitations. Towers: Residential Separation of 300 feet. Institutional Conditional Use Antenna Attachments: No Group 1 Limitations. Towers: Residential Separation of 300 feet. Agricultural Permitted Use Antenna Attachments: No Limitations. Towers: Residential Separation of 200 feet. General Use Permitted Use Antenna Attachments: No Limitations. Towers: Residential Separation of 200 feet. Multi family: High Density Conditional Use Antenna Attachments: No Group 2 Limitations. Towers: Residential Separation of 200 feet. Multi- family: Medium Density Conditional Use Antenna Attachments: No Group 2 Limitations. Towers: Residential Separation of 250 feet. Multi- family: Low Density Special Exception Antenna Attachments: Subject to Site Plan Review. Towers: Residential Separation 300% height of tower. Mobile Home Conditional Use Antenna Attachments: No Group 2 Limitations. Towers: Residential Separation of 200 feet. Duplex Special Exception Antenna Attachments: Subject to Site Plan Review. Towers: Residential Separation 300% height of tower. Single Family: High Density Special Exception Antenna Attachments: Subject to Site Plan Review. Towers: Residential Separation 300% height of tower. Single Family: Medium Density Special Exception Antenna Attachments: Subject to Site Plan Review Towers: Residential Separation 300% height of tower. Single Family: Low Density Special Exception Antenna Attachments: Subject to Site Plan Review Towers: Residential Separation 300% height of tower. Single Family: Estate Special Exception Antenna Attachments: Subject to Site Plan Review Towers: Residential Separation 400% height of tower. PUD: Industrial Conditional Use Antenna Attachments: No Group 1 Limitations. Towers: Residential Separation of 200 feet. PUD: Commercial Special Exception Antenna Attachments: Subject to Site Plan Review Towers: Residential Separation 300% height of tower. PUD: Residential Special Exception Antenna Attachments: Subject to Site Plan Review Towers: Residential Separation 400% height of tower. General Criteria for Permitted Uses Co- location a) Applicant needs to show evidence that it has made diligent but unsuccessful efforts to co- locate its antenna on existing structures within Radio Frequency (RF) Design search area. b) Applicant must state willingness to allow another provider to co- locate on the proposed tower. c) Co- location is not required for stealth facilities, but is encouraged when possible. IP 2. Residential Separation a) Residential Separation requirements may be reduced by Planning Manager when sufficient buffer (natural or man -made) exists between proposed tower and subject residential, when appropriate stealth techniques are used, or when written consent by subject residential owners is obtained. b) Special Exception separation requirements are subject to residentially zoned property. Properties with non conforming residential uses receive a fifty (50) percent decrease in the separation requirement from proposed towers which are subject to Special Exception approval. 3. Tower and communication equipment building must meet setbacks of applicable zoning district. 4. Height of tower up to 300 feet. 5. Type of tower: All types of towers may be used. 6. Construction Standards a) EIA/TIA Standards. b) Structurally able to accommodate an additional provider after initial loading. 7. Landscaping is required. 8. Fencing a) Minimum 8 -foot fence. b) Access through locked gate. 9. Applications for towers which exceed height limitations are subject to special exception. 10. Antenna attachments on designated historic buildings are subject to special exception. Conditional Use Group 1 1. All General Criteria except as amended below. 2. Height of Tower up to 200 feet. 3. Type of tower: all types of towers may be used. Conditional Use Group 2 1. All General Criteria except as amended below. 2. Height of Tower up to 175 feet. 3. Type of Tower: standard monopoles only. S Special Exception 1. All General Criteria except as amended below. 2. All Conditional Use Criteria except as amended below. 3. Tower to Tower Separation a) Standard monopoles must meet separation requirements subject to height (Separation 10x height of proposed tower from any other communication tower). b) No separation requirements where stealth techniques are used. 4. Tower Height up to 120 feet. 5. Type of Tower: standard monopoles only. Tower Replacement 1. Tower rebuilds are permitted uses so long as the service provider brings the new tower up into compliance with the applicable zoning regulations to the maximum extent possible. a) Tower separation requirements are not applicable for any tower rebuild. b) Tower may be relocated anywhere within 50 feet of the pre- existing tower; if the applicant wishes to relocate the tower further than 50 feet away from the pre existing tower, approval is granted by staff if the new tower location on the parent tract meets all the required performance standards for the district in which it is located. 40 Special Exception Requirements (1) Site Location. The purpose of this test is to assist the appropriate governing body in determining whether or not the proposed site location within the applicable search ring of the wireless service provider attempts to utilize existing intermediate land uses to mitigate potential adverse visual impacts of the proposed tower and the nearest residential land uses. (2) Site Orientation. In addition to the site location test, the applicant should demonstrate how the on -site location of the proposed tower maximizes the use of site orientation in order to minimize adverse visual impacts to any adjacent residential uses. Evidence may include photographs or videotape and a corresponding written visual impact assessment which demonstrate how the proposed tower location minimizes adverse impacts. (3) Mitigation Plans. The applicant may submit information concerning proposed mitigation plans to off set or minimize various adverse impacts associated with the proposed tower in regards to residential uses. Mitigation plans may include the 41Ik utilization of compatible support structures in relation to other existing similar structures, the use of camouflaged communications facilities, and the use of landscaping, screening walls, berms and streetscapes. The proposed mitigation plan should be consistent with the anticipated impact level. (4) Additional Information. The applicant may submit any other bona fide documentation or evidence that he or she feels may assist the appropriate governing body in determining anticipated adverse visual impacts. Any person or party opposing the applicants' Special Exception request should submit competent evidence or documentation that a proposed tower will have an adverse aesthetic impact upon his/her property. I OFD' -SITE ZONING SEPARATION* OFF -SITE ZONING TOWER SEPARATION DISTANCE Single Family, Duplex 200' or 300% of the height of the tower, whichever or Single Family Mobile Home is greater (up to a maximum separation of 600') Multi Family 100' or 75% of the height of the tower, whichever is greater (up to a maximum separation of 225') Non-Residential None. Only the setbacks of the applicable zoning district apply *Other Conditions: 1. Setbacks are measured from the GPS location of the tower to the closest building setback line of the off site zoning. 2. Setbacks may be reduced upon the written, notarized consent of all property owner(s) whose property is located within the established setback(s), by an amount agreed upon by such property owner(s). 3. Monopoles of 80' in height or less shall have a required separation distance of 100' from single family, duplex or single- family mobile home zoning. 309772\.AMMON TM I I Permitted Use Special Exception' Monopole 80' or less' R -3, R 3A, R-4, PCD, UC, All other zoning districts PIA, OP, CN, C -1, C-2, C- 3, CS, M -1A, M -1, RM -3 Monopole over 80' and R-4, RM3, PCD,UC, PU, All other zoning districts less than 130' OP, CN, C -1, C -2, C -3, CS, M -1A, M -1 Monopole over 130' and C -2, C -3, M -1A, M -1 All other zoning districts less than 200' Monopole in excess of None All zoning districts 200' Collocated self support C -2, C -3, M -1A, M -1 All other zoning districts tower of 200' or less Collocated self support M -1 All other zoning districts tower over 200' and less than 250' All self- support towers None All zoning districts 250' and higher and all single user self support towers over 200' 'Or conditional use, based on local government zoning code. 'These requirements do not apply to "camouflaged" or "stealth" facilities_ 309770\AMMONIM I M emo To Member's CALNO unication Tower Technical Committee From: Dale G. Finocchi CC: Mike Totten Date: 02/20/97 Re: Industry Standards Due to a schedule conflict I am unable to attend the February 20, 1997 CALNO meeting. I have provided below an overview of concepts to consider when drafting legislation. A licensed carrier needs to provide service to all locations within the geographical boundaries of the licensed area. Not all service providers operate the same type of system or use the same type of technology. Encourage co- location and camouflaged facilities by creating a clear and simple administrative process. Should residential separations be enacted create a sliding scale which does not only create different requirements for different types of towers but also different sizes of like structures. For example, a 120 -foot monopole creates a much different impact than a 200 -foot monople and therefore should not have to meet the same requirements. Tower to Tower separation does not encourage co- location but actually creates a porcupine effect of tower siting. Encourage co- location by requiring all new towers to be able to accommodate additional carriers. This along with a dear administrative process for co-location will allow for the market to radiate all new facilities to existing structures. Allow the special exception process to have the ability to modify any of the requirements (such as separation) should evidence be presented why the certain requirement can not be met. Please advise me of next CALNO meeting so I can place it on my calendar. Should you have any questions or comments on the above ideas please feel free to telephone. Dale G. Finocchi LCC International, Inc. (407) 786 -8920 (407) 592 -0306 I Page 1 I ATTACHMENT D Industry Maps of Existing Communication Towers PrimeCo BellSouth Mobility -APT Bright Star 0 I r r 1 lb' I 202 -7 4 r J` t ti f t .0- `'7iyY y '4.--'4 t a 80 17 0 �f r r L L t i 031 (52'::0 -1-4 't i: 11.1 80309 1 i s j J J v„ y 1 a ea I 0 jg T r, 'let t:. r;a• h i.. �,3 yropo ,.'..N1.% 11 11 4 41 i i ik,<Y. t r r 00 0 Li 80 11 4 8 a3o2 -z 30 4, v t 33 -7 E t_ L,� Ar" �4t 0 .ili gi o s .vA1111114 Pri C, 0 0202-7 i C 4 i• H. c SW. 4t4- II 4 ,i,-,;_,,,, .71 p 5-4 Y t II 4 It '0.......1 s 1 C. iCtl; .11 4 '80 1-2 j...-11.' i., 80307-8c. ri t -1 ::L., 1, I. r 44. s I 80309 41111,z80206-2 -8 f 3:: if) :Cr208-2 1 v'' 80403-9 i _...L.I.: roposed site -r ''-v .7• kl 2 N .;7 ''t, Al 0 7- i" I- 7- 7 t I-- i 1/4`? 7 .,.,.......9 .i 7 i:::: .7 ej AV/ r -J 3 •0 88366- \I' e 6 302-2 I 1- I-,.. It L r 3. :1,2_!,, ......---.....,„--;_d„c. ir \L.,... a t k: L.. L ..L.__*._ L. -1_ 1 ■1 1 PRIMECO PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS SITE ADDRESSES DIRECTIONS Site ID Site Name Site Address City Zip Directions OVIEDO SPORTS A r From Oviedo Center follow SR 149 South approximately 2 mile turn left Into Oviedo Sprats Complex, continue North tc 080200-2 COMPLEX BP 12 $r08d OVIedO 32765 intersection of Road leading to northbound pavilion mi. Site or 080201 -2 RINEHART BP 590 Rinehart Road land Mary exit Go east 1 ml to Rinehart and turn north. Go 1 t. .2 Lake Mary 32746 Raw d site at 590 Rinehart, Take I 4to Lake M west s of road behind Porter Paint Store FPC 230KV (Towne Take I-4 (East) to SR -46. Turn Right at 1st Ught, Approximately 1/10 of a mile make a left into the Cracker Barrel Parkins 080202 -7 BP Y 4644 SR 46 W Sanford 32771: 200 Hickman Drive Sanford 32771 080204 -6 FIRST SANFORD BP 1-4 to Sanford Exit (Hwy 46) then East, across Hwy 17/92 to Elm Ave First Sanford Tower (still labeled as First Seminole) is TOWER In the Northeast corner of the intersection and runs between Elm and Myrtle Avenue 312 W. First Street Sanford 32711 080205 -4 SANFORD PLAZA BP 920 State Street,,,, S anford 32773: I-4 East to Exit 50 (Lake Mary Boulevare). Turn right (East) to Highway 17/92. Turn Left/South to State Street Turn right and follow paved road to end of shopping center. Site will be at end of road on left at back SE comer of shopping center 1180 State Street Sanford 32728 r 1-4 to Lake Mary Exit (Lake Mary Blvd) then East on Lake Mary Blvd. to Longwood -Lake Mary Rd, South Past Lake Mary 080206 -2 FARINA ,,BP: 2187 Longwood L ake Mary Longwood 275 0 High, Just plast Greenwood Blvd (600 to dirt drive on East, Driveway is ingress/egress to site behind trailer. 2163 is before YMCA 2163 Longwood -Lake Mary Road Longwood 32750 SEMINOLE 080208 -2 COUNTY SCHOOL 820 East State Road 434 Winter Springs 32708 Take 1-4 East to State Road 434 East. Take a left on Consolidated Services Street. BOARD FPC ALAFAYA g k 080300 -2 BP 350 Labe Haye Q x QYleO 27 Take I 4 north to Hwy 434. Go east on 434 to Lake Hayes Rd. Turn left and go .3 mi. Site on the righ SUBSTATION 4 350 Lake Hayes Road Oviedo 32765 ad ,A ar 5 a Central Florida Greenway (4 N orth fmm Orlando to Red Bug Exit. East to Aloma Avenue (426 North). Left onto 080302 -2 COMMERCE WAY 17011/1! State BP 6. Qvl ad o 32765 Commerce Way (dirt road) just before RR Crossing across from Toucan MO r 4•a�t`� x 1 3�°�,,I�"i�a"�C /;y +`§ir .2 �i�;; Page 1 11111 PRIMECO PERSONAL COMMUNICATIOfls SITE ADDRESSES DIRECTIONS Site ID Site Name Site Address City Zip Directions FPC 69KV TOWER Take 1-4 to Hw 436 g o East on Hwy 436 to Howell Branch Road On the right is a Fire Station Grand Ave is to the left 080303 -7 BP 3 p11e t2d Winter Pa rk 32792` (Winter Park WA10) Take a left on Grand Ave; go 14 m ile on th ri is the Scottish Rite Temple. Site is the easement in front of the temple 1493 Grand Avenue Winter Park 32792 FPC 230 KV (inter 080304 -7 Tusgawilla Road to Lake Drive, Turn West and follow to Dunmar Clyde and tower Is at the Intersection Springs Sub NR25) Shore Road Winter Springs 080305 -6 CASSELLBERRY 2225 Hunterfield Road Maitland 32751 WATER TOWER 080306 -6 MARVIN/PINNACLE 14 to 434 East to 427 South on 427 to Mahn Avenue. Right on Marvin 800 1155 Charles Street Longwood 32750 FPC MYRTLE LAKE Take 1 4 to Lake Mary Blvd (Exit 50} go East on Lake Mary Blvd to Lake Emma Rd turn Right (South) on Lake Emma Rd 080307 -8 BP 1 Oaks T ralUTele Tower Longwood 32750.; SUBSTATION 3 a g go to Emman Oaks Dr- turn right (West) on Emma Oaks Dr 8 go to the end of the road last part is dirt site is on the ngh FPC WEKIV Take 1-4 to Highway 434 go West on Highway 434 approx 1 mile to Wekiva Springs Road. Tum Right (North) or 080309 -8 BP 942 Vrjektva SpringSRoad Longwood g 32779 SU Weklva springs Road and go approximately .85 miles &look for a fire station on the right site is behind the station 940 Wekiva Springs Longwood 32779 FPC PIEDMONT Take ht to Highway 438 Go West on Highway 436 approximately 3.5 miles. Just past Pine Street site is on right side 080402 -9 BP 2955 Statlo �2 ad 43 p d)� ApoQka _27 Site fronts on Highway 438 SUBSTATION Page 2 PRIMECO PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS SITE ADDRESSES DIRECTIONS Site ID Site Name Site Address City Zip Directions FPC POLE CHANGE w y I to 436 west on 436 to Forest City Rd (434)-Turn left (South)3go to 230KV pwr trans line crosses -the easement to the 080404 -6 OUT ASL 130 BP 387 St Road 43 South a g Fore CIty 32714 site follows the pwr line to the left(East). Access off of 4343fdlows the power line easement Site sets trail from 434 -300 (Spring Lake) P �z y d 385 South SR 434 Forest City 32751 FPC DOUGLAS SUB fr 081100 BP, a R =$x az Y r SR 436, Turn West immediately turn right at 1st light on gcug (Pole ASW17) Avenue 451 Cranes Way Altamonte Springs 32701 Page 3 0 BellSouth Mobility Cell Sites Seminole County EXISTING SITES CELL NUMBER: NAME TYPE HEIGHT 3 Winter Springs Self Supporting 220' 9 Wekiva Self Supporting 180' 20 Goldenrod Self Supporting 250' 25 Altamonte Roof -top 95' 27 Sanford Self Supporting 250' 32 Oviedo Self Supporting 250' 40 Longwood Self- Supporting 180' 41 Casselberry Self Supporting 180' 49 Lakemont Self- Supporting 180' 52 Hidden Lake Self Supporting 166' 57 Lake Mary Self Supporting 220' III 79 Rolling Hills Monopole 150' 83 Alafaya Self Supporting 180' 90 Forest City Monopole 180' 98 Geneva Self- Supporting 280' PROPOSE!) SITES ::.CELL NUMBER NAME TYPE HEIGHT 97 Seminole Mall Monopole 180' 109 N. Maitland Monopole 150' Markham Woods Monopole 120' North Street Monopole 150' 0 a BellSouth Mobility Seminole County 10/1/96 4 97' 0 2 1 1 I 98 3 9 1 A i 25 41 32 11 99- 0 41 a 109 a 2 0 1 qD 83 I 1 iii Towers/fix'' l ...,H lk r 1 4101KIIM. AMERICAN PORTABLE TELECO I_ 5907 B. Hampton n Oaks Parkway VJ 4, Tampa. FL 33610 813 663 -1000 Fax:813- 623 -4011 illi Pager: 407-290-7672 Cellular: 407.620 -2367 411* A2E -406 -0 A2E- 2 15 -0 A2E— 4 -0 O 1 A2:-416-0 144-0 A2E 3 —O A2 —0 re• 5, R, 9 i� A2E 9 -0 orr A 2 E 131 -0 0 0% IW s ac -0 rat 111-1, Aid l n 4 as 30 -0 -i t II fA� 1 Iwo r r D ri0-1a1'1:9-0 1� �I� IpIl a -0 iii!' w�� Vi 1 BRIGHT STAR TOWER AND CONSULTING, INC. August 28, 1996 Mr. Don Fisher, Planner Seminole County, Current Planning Division 1101 East First Street Sanford, Florida 32771 Ref.: Filing of a Master Plan, Ordinance No. 96 -5 Dear Mr. Fisher: As we discussed this week, our company has a 250' guyed tower in Seminole County, within the Sanford city limits, that was built for co- location purposes for wireless communications. This new tower was designed to accommodate the wireless transmission needs for cellular, PCS, paging, and other two -way communications needs for a ten mile radius of its location. Our tower was designed to accommodate up to three cellular/PCS carriers and twelve paging or two-way communications tenants. We believe that this capability will be adequate for many years of growth in the communications industry within its area of coverage. For your records, here are the details on our Sanford tower site. Tower Name: Sanford FAA Study Number: 96- ASO- 0585 -OE Address: 1201 Albright Road, Sanford Latitude: 28 deg 47' 57" Longitude: 81 deg 18' 01" Tower Height: 250' (with antenna) Max. Ht. AMSL: 288' Tower Type: Guyed, Rohn Model 80 Series For your reference, we have also included a map showing the exact location of the tower site. Please feel free to call us if you have any questions or need further assistance. Sincerely, William F. G er enclosure cc: Russell L. Gibson, Land Development Coordinator, City of Sanford AUG 2 9 1996 4025 West Danby Court, Winter Springs, Florida 32708 (407) 699 -0336 SANFORD Star Tower CHURC Rand Yard o I +,o I KEN J NARCISSUS N. central Ronda Regional Ii ital O Z w F A rni NH•SON St Josephs o v G1■ i d�t t a1 MI m k�� i u) UBY r �i7i ®a��I■ ■i Smith Canal C; K t y TUNE a ®C® l� qi m Nil M u�°1�` ®1 ®1 t I K E G '1 Santo -d e l �w s; u� Lr;! o ;a,:ui I 1201 Albright Road lit' J ®S i ew Upsala Lat.: 28 deg 47' 57 �7 TE T 1 f Q �g f 15gip 87 1®®1 HUGHEY� L° E :1 I �111 1 III 74 j OOD i o�ntry C ub Manor avenn- a�p 4 4 4. a� RS•'' Ft:aJnia!, .er 4 t 7 1 r t 41 all..,,,, 11 i 1 SR a L.ckArbor' SR 46A 1 1 1 ��u U �:1.� h• r BRWiCL o Iff".4 I u m �r Drea w.rd sefo a P tl MR Arno ...„..41,;„.....:,=:::7:, n, Rese e ke r 7 a .i 1 V 1 r R R La e J e n nie •�p K L:.:,.,.:::::::., 1 -NO o bna�,� PINE i i S, S anford•Riaza Shopping Center C a l La OO J i• p''s if b Jan' M® 0 .i e., v 17 H .E 3 v y i Lake Ada m o .11 .;:C4'...i1M;',4;igiiiig!:L...... 7.f.'.7:;'N■ -1W E. K c II T�S• FL• D y 'j kddeii ke S mi. ,::0-8:m:50;N.,44•:. Q L. i i P� PIXY MM.= 1 ;.w Lake Mary i z ly9 6cl:omne r N O MEA• 0 ATTACHMENT E Maps /Criteria of Permitted Communication Tower Areas City of Oviedo City of Sanford -City of Altamonte Springs -City of Lake Mary (Criteria Only) Ill 0 5 4 t a i Filo LirgtLian-re. Ail ,/1 lb. gig a I CITY OF A OVIEDO 8 1 2 r k de 7 v Ng& A mallif i rill i irIMAII 4 00 PCTENTIA TELECOMMUNICATION Melia, TOVER L� ATIONS rill i l d L i l i i i l 11 C ow1.. �1 7 4 1 A. C iro■ =1 j� -1 (1=4 WI Ism 1_ idb4. rai r 77:0 0 ii AN C II C A____111111W. .I.Iimu,,AtTr,re F., i ir a A ik, et,PLII 11 a pi t 91iF (dir 29 28 O o 4 0 City of Sanford Communication Tower Permitted and Conditional Use Zones -NRIII•WilliPw.:---w 1 1 ;•u1 iii 1 0 e El 1 IL' Akiiill=10,` .,-e, ANIMILie ■,e, 11111111 7 I nor hilrirar; A-....--...,. ,,i,1 1 I r marili 4 S/ A ii I• i t r r i!�'� —mi i i VIII... li II 7 ■L9 /I• T.7•� /I it 7 T INffiguir Legend R r� r un j �.a /:1 /Ire.. 7 1 I Permitted Use .0 Conditional Use EN 440" :07 L ID City II. =El 1 Easement o :wi 1=111M11.1111:tr ..fgaiiA 4' .■.;•2 g Boundary U iiii y rY 1 ,_!7„ i�j I r i i Existing Tower /i a �I 'For Illustration Purposes Only f :�i r Prepared By Dept. of Engineering and Planning, 01/97. a �TpN10HTE SP N CITY OF ALTAMONTE SPRINGS h 225 NEWBURYPORT AVENUE ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32701 -3697 DID pn �p FLORID r nn 1 �.J January 2, 1997 6 n r ECe._,NEER!N CITY OF SANFOrcD, FLA. Mr. Andrew VanGaale, Associate Planner Planning and Development Department City of Sanford 300 North Park Avenue Sanford, Florida 32771 Re: CALNO Communication Tower Technical Committee Information Requested in Advance of January 16, 1997 Meeting Dear Mr. VanGaale: Pursuant to the request at the December 12, 1996 technical committee meeting, I am providing the 1110 following information to you. The City's contact person for information transmittal under the Interlocal Agreement concerning notification is: Pat Wainright, City Clerk City of Altamonte Springs 225 Newburyport Avenue Altamonte Springs, Florida 32701 Tel: 263 -3780 Fax: 830 -4421 I have reviewed the Altamonte Springs portion of the Sanford's Communication Tower Matrix and offer the following corrections: Conditional/Special Exception Uses "Conditional use in institutional zones, very light industrial zones, and mixed office industrial zones.” (The language about water and sewer treatment plants, sports stadiums, etc. in our ordinance is for contextual purposes within the respective zoning district regulations. It will not appear in the codified version of the ordinance). WE ARE PEOPLE WHO CARE ABOUT PEOPLE c Mr. Andrew VanGaale, City of Sanford CALNO Communication Tower Information January 2, 1997 Page 2 Separation from Single Family and Multi Family Residential "300% of the tower height, up to a maximum of 200'." Committee members were also asked to identify locations and/or general criteria where towers can/should be located within our respective jurisdictions. The Altamonte Springs communication tower and antenna ordinance expresses the City's policy regarding tower types and the appropriate placement of towers within the City limits. Namely, towers are possible in institutional, very light industrial, and mixed office- industrial zones, as well as on buildings greater than 35 feet in height. Monopole and lattice construction types are permitted. At this time, placement in right -of -way areas has not been addressed. I have attached for your reference a copy of a map depicting existing towers and possible tower sites within the City. The City firmly supports its established communication tower policy. However, it is not unforeseeable that issues and concepts examined at the CALNO meetings, as well as observations of the development and regulation of towers, may prompt a review of the policy at a future date. Accordingly, we plan to continue our participation in the CALNO dialogue. If you have any questions or need additional assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at telephone (407) 830 -3966 or fax (407) 263 -3773. Sincerely, 0 01k.,S4c2/ John Sember, AICP, Current Planning Coordinator Growth Management Department JMS Enclosure cc: Tim A. Wilson, Growth Management Director Pat Wainright, City Clerk S Z \W P\C OM MT W RS\CALNOLEf. W P D COMMUNICATION TOWER/ANTENNA INVENTORY LOG City of Altamonte Springs Growth Management Department Updated October 17, 1996 FREESTANDING COMMUNICATION TOWERS IN ALTAMONTE SPRINGS Tower Owner Prop. Owner Site General Location Tower Type Map Notes Florida Hospital Florida Hospital SR 436 Lattice T1 Pre -Tower Ord./March '96 survey Altamonte Springs City Hall SR 436/Newburyport Ave Lattice T2 Pre -Tower Ord./March '96 survey Sprint Telephone Sprint Telephone Newburyport Ave Lattice T3 Pre -Tower Ord./March '96 survey WXXL Radio WXXL Radio S Northlake Blvd Lattice T4 Pre-Tower Ord./March '96 survey TCI Cable TCI Cable SR 434 /Jamestown Blvd Guyed T6 Pre -Tower Ord./March '96 survey DialCall SR 434 /Sunshine Ln Monopole T8 Planned tower/Recently annexed FREESTANDING COMMUNICATION TOWERS IN ADJACENT JURISDICTIONS Tower Owner Prop. Owner Site General Location Tower Type Map Notes Jurisdic. BellSouth 901 Douglas Ave Monopole T5 Pre-March '96 SC BellSouth SR 436/Laurel St Monopole 11 Constructed 8/96 SC Unknown 782 Sanlando Road Lattice T9 Pre-March '96 SC Unknown Cadace Drive Industrial Park T10 Pre-March '96 SC APT SR 436, 500' E of 17/92 Monopole T11 Planned tower SC PrimeCo Florida Power Spring Lake Substation Monopole T12 Constructed 8/96 SC Unknown Florida Power Raymond/Hillcicsl Monopole T13 Planned tower In FPC easement SC This inventory has been compiled through field surveys and development applications. There may exist additional communication towers over 35 feet tall that would affect an application for a new tower. Applicants for a new tower are required to provide documentation indicating existing towers and development orders for new towers within 1,500 feet of the subject site. Rename: r othe[1towvrlog.vvb2 Page 1 of 2 u.q' O :f I� i 1. V n�� .1 c�I,�■ :.0 ■uu r u. 4.J.�'•' 9�I '�G.r .1�) II`. 1 fir a mnun� .�1 `J 1. ��r oo J ��r lnall'N.,'u .uu� ',�11� �L��♦ rl f =_I G�� ;r.1.Ii 1 --�a� �•,....eal� /_.mod O, ml•'I� �r�{. T i� uu n a uuu Ilgl:: �tttll io�.,.�c��g'1?r /t, �7 .f \7 r'- •1...., .;►u i. I un mu uul ■Iw tl.r °g$""a 51ar.� °a�/,; I I 77 1. 1! t■ /'GC� uw wu uuu mu uu �I Rs�en�d dl a 1 ♦aw uw ■uw- wu ,ad .Y5/ r tl,�� 1 ��'�'��I:: y eJ I•i rl mu um 7 um Q ::da. t[ rrr__J___ 1�.= Il'.� ■1 lumuu .wu ��It�� 1,. 9��1 ga��9��..e��:��. �T �I$� i �I uuu u... .n n �i��" e y I° �''�rE:............. 11 ti !C5i ili :m,._._ .u\ u. lieu uu.ltnm �1 Y I� l�-.�I Y."f rvF 'F� 7r� m x� I ,1•. lFs iii ii wiu iiii ��I �r a �i ■u■■• d ��i'P ■�'r'e."� ;,;,r 1: 1.. r r I 1 t-�-"P�. i I 1 1 1'� �h %1 m. i1• rr /��.r 6P, '?c��_w I u�n�� 1 r I'��J uulm \I' �G 111111 .f. i r ,P f 6 �.;1 NCi.�' I/ '1. el�e...n I ii dal: .1 1- ■��t./ 1 ■1 I •..��`1.Z.I1� ��1�� wm :.:'I. ID.: ��I ��,u.�■:: ■1■�I ■1 n i' /f6 JJa.�. s$' a'T .t1 i.■` 1 .fYu 1■ �1,� ■1 :1111�� 111111 111'. .n i'. I rl� v,. {I �.e.��®.■ II,T U :'N.■5... ..0 r�� i�l ■U m B 1 I t- i of I I wum•nu u` ri ii.: �1 i Ii:ii I /,rF :•r" '�ie..!II\3 1��.,.1.... ,.J�� IE'" 1 e....,.a..,.1......11...1....: ;11 1 ■U ;t a. T aun e9 A r u.eolr.c eo n.�...1 1 a muum 'r. �F9ec �r '�VUlu..n-ie e.uuluml luul ■IIL "..�i' Iii ®�Iiiu =mu 'I t aR1n11e4 'g wun ila�l► ��.r =�t�{ �:�_.i��-..■ ��.✓fi: �Initle "y I.ii u1� �'I 1 ��i. �'•�uu �iuu I 7.9 I.:{ ed• �.e.e .u.e■ �.IT17... ml ■I■L- lu.l I J 1. r ..0....:Ja o ueu.. 111{1 O �np ret I9 •..:`aiii -I I�t.�u iinul ull■� _tf. 1�. L•.��:.::�:! 35IE:�i c'li er. rs e�.: i;: Pa l "1....�.�I�...�u.uni■ -uln.i ur.uln. �.li��.a O:i ►`.::�i I .uwuuip' :eat a 1 vu ne ®a I p. .luumuun: uunulllUU nllnl= _i O� 1 [I .111111 :1 ��1�' I.. \1 ■11111 ■i \1 .A .r1- 11111111 ..111.. 111 11 M.IIes ..EQ 11111•• ■rlr. •�■'I \•IIIII.� �Tw .1 i': I _r• _ :1 �I�� i 5•�i .0• ?.uurl Wu ■.u111' 1■■Ilul:.l"�frl �n10 Pt. 2, RM -.1._..n In �l .tG 1.: ..r! �iiiii °iii C■ C, tIOH e� u•• 1 W IA 4 t 7t a• I��1�. all,a,,. is 11 .11..••- l I` u`.•, 4 IIII,I� i 1��. �fl •1- 1.1 111 f ,111 .1.111 (I.; 0 .•ii.•. do m It��. 1•. p 1111 1..�■1 .II i C ■II.. i111..1♦�� 1''d��:i.'•ii.�, l'II ■IIII.�III11♦�I.'.:\ X17 ^I 1■ -o•- i :IC: Z;:..:.-::_�. �Ilnt:�_1 I'• .I�,i� a �aw i >ll�� iili■ ;��•��J 5.:: •r °.:.:I -1 .0 ■�nii': _I 6 w l j� y� i:... iQ t ��!e „�;I rSu. a- _e /lme a ®p I ,i...........' p�y ��i -I 7 �•l� 1;& :`caul d'3 �,♦V ..1 ..�I nnnu PIIIIIIIII :Cam" !Ple;i r I t II y I`� 'lII!:11•`•�rnw n.ur m.■u 11 i ?F�'■ ':`o \w Ia s'� .o.�� u.� d Y'�; It. 1'� h ^Im:+sl m ■nnmlwm- .IiuinN: �I S'J 111 r �f .7` r'. r �.i o�..Tf.�.`� =e1 \FIJI n■IG `.nu.m. �I�,It �C ;.la ^i�� •.4�o':i■ I �'�.[wy .f P ��9 ;z. III ':IS p7_:IT,.r .Illl�amum uul■ ••u.::: ;IIIIIIg11I� ®v o /,.o.;� ■OIIrPii �`'y 1:8 ®s� �I` ii �li� �1 q .n C �.�.1J °s`:•. d� d y l iO 61:i /�t �1.✓i;� It ®`I�� y l ili�9_I v 1� IIII ■,_uuu numn- 1, p ....`.a; ■I lr 1... 111. ,��t� �cLrS�ot t z �8� P.a ■i.■ _nn 11l l._ i ,,t i ,r t 11_ c I�F.�": '.�1 :I tia C�� <e�sr�Jr .w •I� .io �min ii ^A .y n� G�� r. .�j a� `"i{�a'1 `i�1'! Tia" -!e ►r I'e I c c'e I. ..n.6.1.. r -IU��\ l� Ip d e.: g s:e�a� 4: I -��„u b Ye: n s� IIII �II\ 1 y ��t�"� S:r. �s t�Br�t�ft. ecx S' n_ ®rlr -I f7 mo-� S .r 1 _i' ■z �81.�5I \I��SI' `r,�q.1�� @i�l ■114.. r I G'�•� 1 /�,sl� ��s&tt��f3°w" 11 /!m r >a n �u %III -1 n 1 9'/ ��d �I*�is�l�r ■7L1�16 S n►� I' r �.■_.L.r�1..�:1:��:� II��., s1 -:a �:r'•ull�l 4 k nollunn... i:llll: -1 y 1 1 t 1 y It R /jl ■�I� {e�lt$`t�� r ��=''r= =;1�; �c�a•`_ 1111. '�'�'"'rr; ��I��IL dl.L t f /j�• i i t l '1Ui Q G n t� -mr iriiiiil °iiiiiuii iiiiiiiii °iiiiiiiii 1� A 1 'll rllll J u. 11111. .Ff'll�� I p„�.r,a.... 1 i .r a�un-. n`el IIIIP Ialwnl 1 ■i 1 ___IIIIIII' Y,t ItlU nu.. iuu t�.al uun■ 3i1�t -�1� i s \t 4 �R'Ikr iinu t.0 iu �uu muv. r/ a, 1 I I •i i p -�.F, /uu.� r w ,J• `IIlLIIIIIIII ::1. _::t1: 11 i':: _:I�, i� 7 /is a "1�2�°�} �I�.� 1 �I:. "'es r.. I I n umuty� �:::1,��' t" P ►�Illuui ►t 1�•w•• 134? q 'i.. Q� ':n.'.. i l.� `�..IIi p �'i. rl� V� ♦�•►P ♦i Ii♦ .P ►1��..I r��. _mi 't 1 ICJ ?��pt 1� °L F' 8 tr.a ♦p♦ r1 1� i ■`.,`"t -J.. I'1� II�'11 II ■1111 ed. ice■ ?iii P r. j 9.`� �q� e/ r @s a BB4B• q► 1 �I� I�� 1 ��.�7 I� n Ir. 7au.ul.ti l 1' ■i .1111 s 9r, ry �i•�.e _d�, �'.,.i�.�lA_ ,.o \fib® �...I,,., u::::..,.l.lur. ,I'IIIIU j..'.. ''5�� a l I:.ulle:: nuu _.ue,ml......: ff 1�� 1 �i "��'��o, I ■aU■ �IP� I' �1� W!'�fa'ali� i• _.1'= II►!� e l ♦l :rC /�1:.!.�:::: �I,1�■ ®_•.Illlllnol (e :flu. ■I1 eu I7 1�� a♦ .c. �i7■i♦� •iii' -u iuiiimul 5 Sri i i�! "L•xesas� Il��,�i`�ijii� j I��/ X :•:I'.;'� ��iie .I�� I III ■rq �,d. i i� i�I:\ 1 i T �I .I� ,I" ■1�.• \s; I v �C__� :;I: aiu:• �fl", 4�� r y: tih. iJ:' :nnuuuwnml• ��S' •ia_ ?''�Il� ��I �,�'I _l II..��/ ■-.7 1111111tte111. .111►.. /11111111. tl•�i :lllllllllllllllllll: mnri'nr.',� a�, l' II''�I 11J �I' "1 t c';E t c�il ,fE�k q��.�. i {i: c.-- Si:�• L r S: u ll �f� /i �i: r r��i�6:a 1{�Y+s ::i v 1 c ■i 1 d =1n� a •t .1.... .��I� J A 1 11: ee r t ar tso�+9 'sn.�. �,,,�1 __:Illilt� r �1� ..•i� I =�1 1 ..I r_.: 111►0 rue 1 I t: •u u� 1 .11 q dlsRr 1n II •Lu. i ��.1-- �I iitt �1 1� D a ea �.w• �1►►i i' -■1. ■1 ■I unuil: _�'r. :1 sYe e B 1 rA p l..`�.. i 6 9 ✓�Y" /F'.✓t�P �L/ r t1 �I.� �•r■ I .Yi �t 3�s `f�v iSI•= �111.� finii; i f r .6 r� !r 1�= ',1= u.••n... t I� t� ::Y I II\ .c._t_ wm.• I ..1 r y -r �J �7A I �1.�•:: :ilulnl7 �r� r'�ETA I'. -i aRauaru� •tl .I ��,f, d iL !'�.j fF ��J I :�li.`•4� uml_ 1 I .0' /'i'i °`?a,u,,m,.u',: I VS ?O�f N rfF f�` �I 111 ■i �i: •y...•• ��.`.1 ..q..• CIA: .i:� I,�i:-a:'��'�ie� f r �I',• Ii \II I♦,� ii iili• I n.o.m.`l�ll�- a.n n 1 p' 'q.( ✓�•�4ri�� i 1 1■�1 r1�1 ®r' :!AQtIIA \.:1:�� I� 1 LEGEND "�'y p Water towers located w/i Altamonte Springs Existing and Proposed towels outside of Altamonte <�e Fn 1500 FOOT SEPARATION Buildings over 35 feet in height located in Springs jurisdiction r. BETWEEN TOWERS Altamonte Springs �;,r�"��•P'? Potential Zoning districts allowing 'f Buildings over 35 feet in height located in Tower locatidns the county sd.�r L 1 200 foot set back from residential 0 1!2 2 Existing communication towers located in land uses /zoning I I I I Altamonte Springs MILES COMMUNICATION TOWER/ANTENNA INVENTORY LOG City of Altamonte Springs Growth Management Department Updated October 17, 1996 FREESTANDING COMMiTNICATION TOWERS IN ALTAMONTE SPRINGS Tower Owner Prop. Owner /Site General Location Tower Type Map Notes Florida Hospital Florida Hospital SR 436 Lattice Tl Pre -Tower Ord./March'96 survey Altamonte Springs City Hall SR 436/Nevvburyport Ave Lattice T2 Pre -Tower Ord./March'96 survey Sprint Telephone Sprint Telephone Ncvvburyport Ave Lattice T3 Pre -Tower Ord./March'96 survey WXJ��. Radio WX��. Radio S Northlake Blvd Lattice T4 Pre -Tower Ord./March'96 survey TCI Cable TCI Cable SR 434 /Jamestown Blvd Guyed T6 Pre -Tower Ord./March'96 survey DialCall SR 434 /Sunshine Ln Monopole T8 Planned tower/Recently annexed FREESTANDING COMMUNICATION TOWERS IN ADJACENT JURLSDICTIONS Tower Owner Prop. Owner /Site General Location Tower Type Map Notes Jurisdic. BellSouth 901 Douglas Ave Monopole TS Pre- March'96 SC BellSouth SR 436/Laurel St Monopole T7 Constructed 8/96 SC Unknown 782 Sanlando Road Lattice T9 Pre- March'96 SC Unknown Cadace Drive Industrial Park T10 Pre- March'96 SC APT SR 436, S00' E of 17/92 Monopole Tl l Platu►ed tower SC PrimeCo Florida Power Spring Lake Substation Monopole T12 Constructed 8/96 SC Unknown Florida Power Raymond/Hillcrest Monopole T13 Plaiu►ed tower In FPC easement SC This inventory has been compiled through field surveys and development applications. There may exist additional communication towers over 35 feet tall that would affect an application for a new tower. Applicants for a new tower are required to provide documentation indicating existing towers and development orders for new towzis within 1,500 feet of the subject site. F�laume: zbthalto�vr- log.�vb2 Page 1 of 2 'J .t y j January 14, 1997 To: The file From: Matthew West, City Planner Subject: Acceptable Communication Tower locations Electrical substations In alignment with tall utility transmission poles In the middle of wetland or conservation areas which are not likely to be heavily developed or deforested (Soldiers Creek). In the middle of industrial areas between Lake Emma Road and Interstate 4 or between Rinehart Road and Interstate 4. Within the City's sports complex. Towers could blend in with stadium lights. On top of tall buildings. Along 17 -92 provided tower base is not seen from right of way. Monopole construction preferred. Heavily landscaped base. Black vinyl�oated fencing around base. No signs on tower like "Super Doppler 2"