Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025 11 06 Public Hearing 400 - 7 Brew Drive Thru CoffeePUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM 400 PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY AGENDA | NOVEMBER 6, 2025 REGULAR MEETING TITLE 7 Brew Drive-Thru Coffee, 1248 E. SR 434 – Site/Final Engineering, Aesthetic Review, Waiver, Condition, and Development Agreement. SUMMARY The Community Development Department requests that the Planning & Zoning Board hold a Public Hearing to consider a Site/Final Engineering, Aesthetic Review, Waivers, and Development Agreement regarding the applicant’s request to construct a ±510 sq. ft. coffee shop with a drive-through and ±262 sq. ft. cooler/storage in the Town Center District, T5 Transect. FUNDING SOURCE RECOMMENDATION Site/Final Engineering, Aesthetic Review, Waivers, and Development Agreement, subject to the following conditions of approval: Execution of the Development Agreement. All grass on the Property shall be Bahia grass. No St. Augustine grass or grass types with low drought tolerance shall be permitted. Economic Impact analysis required before City Commission Public Hearing. 9 TITLE 7 Brew Drive-Thru Coffee, 1248 E. SR 434 – Site/Final Engineering, Aesthetic Review, Waiver, Condition, and Development Agreement. SUMMARY The Community Development Department requests that the Planning & Zoning Board hold a Public Hearing to consider a Site/Final Engineering, Aesthetic Review, Waivers, and Development Agreement regarding the applicant’s request to construct a ±510 sq. ft. coffee shop with a drive-through and ±262 sq. ft. cooler/storage in the Town Center District, T5 Transect. General Information Applicant Erin Dudley, CEI Engineering Property Owner(s) Tuskawilla Retail Partners II, LLC Location 1248 E State Road 434, Winter Springs, FL 32708 Tract Size ±0.5 Acres (subdivided from 8.11 Acres parent lot) Parcel ID Number 26-20-30-5AR-0A00-007L Zoning Designation Town Center District, T-5 Transect FLUM Designation Town Center District Adjacent Land Use North: Seminole Crossing Townhomes East: Cross Seminole Trail South: State Road 434 West: Vacant Height 19’, 1 story Setbacks Front: 25 ft, minimum, 50 ft. maximum Rear: 15 ft. minimum Side: 5 ft. minimum, 100 ft. maximum Development Standards Lot Coverage 100% Development Permits Not applicable Development Agreement Pending; prior Development Agreements were with predecessor in interest, Winter Springs Holdings, Inc., recorded at ORB 8446, Page 1131, and First Modification at ORB 8852, Page 1719 and the Tuskawilla Retail Partners II, PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM PLANNING & ZONING BOARD THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 2025 REGULAR MEETING 10 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M | T H U R S D A Y , N o v e m b e r 6 , 2 0 2 5 , | P A G E 2 O F 16 LLC Development Agreement for Blake Commons, recorded at ORB 10887, Pages 649-660 Code Enforcement Not applicable City Liens Not applicable Background Data: The development site consists of one lot, totaling 0.5 acres. The City Commission recently approved The Blake Commons plat, subject to conditions, which proposes to subdivide the 8.11-acre parent parcel. The 7 Brew Drive-Thru Coffee shop is proposed to be located on Lot 2 of The Blake Commons plat. The development site is located at the northeast corner of S.R. 434 and Michael Blake Boulevard. The applicant is proposing to construct a ±510 sq. ft. coffee shop with two (2) drive- through lanes and ±262 sq. ft. cooler/storage in the Town Center District, T5 Transect. Due to the cooler/storage accessory building proposed to be attached by a five (5) foot in length breezeway, it is considered an expansion of the principal structure per Sec.6-84(2) of the City of Winter Springs municipal code. The proposed coffee shop does not include indoor and outdoor seating areas or drive-through service windows, but utilizes the doors located on the west side of the building to serve the customers. Coffee shops with a drive-through is a permitted use in the Town Center District, Transect 5 (T5). Tuskawilla Retail Partners II is responsible for constructing and installing all supporting infrastructure for this development, including grading, utility extensions, stormwater collection facilities, and the Sea Hawk Cove extension to serve the 0.50 acre development site for the 7 Brew Drive-Thru Coffee shop, in accordance with the Final Engineering Plans approved by the City Commission for the Sea Hawk Cove Extension/The Blake Commons. Upon receipt of the Planning and Zoning Board's recommendation, the City Commission shall make a final decision on the application, to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the project within the Town Center district. Public Notices: Notices were mailed to all owners of real property adjacent to and within approximately five-hundred (500) feet of the subject property and all Homeowner’s Associations on file with the City of Winter on October 13, 2025. A Community Workshop was held on June 10, 2025 at 5:00 PM at The Foundry Church. There were no objections raised at the Community Workshop regarding the proposed development. Please see (Figure “1”) Community Workshop Flyer and (Figure “2”) Community Workshop Attendance. Analysis of Final Engineering Plans (Sec. 20-33.1) Criteria: The criteria for Final Engineering Plans are provided and analyzed below: 11 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M | T H U R S D A Y , N o v e m b e r 6 , 2 0 2 5 , | P A G E 3 O F 16 (a) Site and final engineering plans and the subdivision of land shall also be subject to the technical requirements set forth in Chapter 9 of the City Code. It is the intent of this section to apply to applications for site and final engineering plans and to any subdivision of land requiring a plat, if applicable, and does not include review and approval of a lot split application. Please see the discussion below regarding technical requirements of Chapter 9. The Final Engineering Plans have been reviewed by the City’s contract engineer, who concluded that the Plans satisfy the technical requirements. provided the conditions of approval set forth below are met. (b) Except in situations involving one (1) single-family home, the Planning and Zoning Board shall be required to review all site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land applications and make a written recommendation to the city commission. Such recommendation shall include the reasons for the board's recommendation and show the board has considered the applicable criteria set forth in this section. (c) Upon receipt of the planning and zoning board's recommendation, the city commission shall make a final decision on the application. If the city commission determines that the planning and zoning board has not made a recommendation on an application within a reasonable period of time, the city commission may, at its discretion, consider an application without the planning and zoning board's recommendation. Except in situations involving one (1) single-family home, all site and final engineering plan and subdivision recommendations and final decisions shall be based on whether the site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land comply with all the technical requirements set forth in chapter 9 of the City Code and the following criteria to the extent applicable: (1) Whether the applicant has demonstrated the site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land, including its proposed density, height, scale and intensity, hours of operation, building and lighting design, setbacks, buffers, noise, refuse, odor, particulates, smoke, fumes and other emissions, parking and traffic - generating characteristics, number of persons anticipated using, residing or working under the plan, and other off-site impacts, is compatible and harmonious with adjacent land uses, and will not adversely impact land use activities in the immediate vicinity. Analysis: Staff finds that the proposed Development is compatible and harmonious with adjacent land uses and will not adversely impact land use activities in the immediate vicinity. The height is within the limits of the Town Center District, T5 Transect as it does not exceed two stories and has sufficient landscape buffers to be aesthetically pleasing. The proposed two (2) lane drive- through coffee shop will operate Monday through Thursday between the hours of 5:30 a.m. and 10:00 p.m., and Friday through Sunday between the hours of 5:30 a.m. and 11:00 p.m. Staff has reviewed the Traffic Impact Analysis-Queue Analysis 12 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M | T H U R S D A Y , N o v e m b e r 6 , 2 0 2 5 , | P A G E 4 OF 16 prepared by Traffic Mobility Consultants (TMC), (Figure 10) and finds the model predicts this development will generate eight (8) vehicles during the AM peak hours and four (4) vehicles during the PM peak hours. Based on 132 daily trips generated, the 7 Brew Drive-Thru Coffee project will not be required to provide any mobility credits. The Queue Analysis indicates that the development will accommodate up to nineteen (19) vehicles within the drive-through area, which exceeds the required capacity. Further, the site and final engineering plan depicts safe and efficient means of ingress and egress into and out of the neighborhood and adequately addresses the impact of projected traffic on the immediate neighborhood, traffic circulation patterns for the neighborhood, and traffic flow through immediate intersections and arterials (2) Whether the applicant has demonstrated the size and shape of the site, the proposed access and internal circulation, and the design enhancements to be adequate to accommodate the proposed density, scale and intensity of the site and final engineering plan requested. The site shall be of sufficient size to accommodate design amenities such as screening, buffers, landscaping, open space, off-street parking, safe and convenient automobile, bicycle, and pedestrian mobility at the site, and other similar site plan improvements needed to mitigate against potential adverse impacts of the proposed use. Analysis: Staff finds that the Applicant has demonstrated that the size and shape of the site, the proposed access and internal circulation, and the design enhancements to be adequate to accommodate the proposed density, scale, and intensity of the site and final engineering plan requested. The lot size will accommodate the ±510 sq. ft. coffee shop with a drive-through and ±262 sq. ft. cooler/storage building and design amenities. (3) Whether the proposed site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land will have an adverse impact on the local economy, including governmental fiscal impact, employment, and property values. Analysis: Staff finds that the proposed site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land will not have an adverse impact on the local economy, including governmental fiscal impact, employment, and property values. Rather, the construction of a coffee shop with a drive-through will have a beneficial impact on the local economy, providing additional coffee shop options to local residents and workers, while also providing employment at the facility. Staff find that these impacts will improve property values by continuing to make Town Center a desirable place to live and work). (4) Whether the proposed site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land will have an adverse impact on the natural environment, including air, water, and noise pollution, vegetation and wildlife, open space, noxious and desirable vegetation, and flood hazards. 13 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M | T H U R S D A Y , N o v e m b e r 6 , 2 0 2 5 , | P A G E 5 O F 16 Analysis: Staff finds that the proposed site and final engineering plan will not have an adverse impact on the natural environment, including air, water, and noise pollution, vegetation and wildlife, open space, noxious and desirable vegetation, and flood hazards. The project is located outside of the special flood hazard area. (5) Whether the proposed site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land will have an adverse impact on historic, scenic, and cultural resources, including views and vistas, and loss or degradation of cultural and historic resources. Analysis: The proposed site and final engineering plan will have no impact on historical resources. No additional scenic or cultural resources. Including scenic views or vistas, will be impacted by this site and final engineering plan. (6) Whether the proposed site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land will have an adverse impact on public services, including water, sewer, stormwater and surface water management, police, fire, parks and recreation, streets, public transportation, marina and waterways, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Analysis: City Staff have reviewed this project from a planning and engineering perspective. Staff did not find any adverse impact on any of the public services listed above. The City Public Works Department has confirmed available water and sewer capacity. (7) Whether the site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land, and related traffic report and plan provided by the applicant, details safe and efficient means of ingress and egress into and out of the neighborhood and adequately addresses the impact of projected traffic on the immediate neighborhood, traffic circulation pattern for the neighborhood, and traffic flow through immediate intersections and arterials. Analysis: Staff has reviewed the Traffic Impact Analysis-Queue Analysis prepared by Traffic Mobility Consultants (TMC), (Figure 10) and finds the model predicts this development will generate 8 vehicles during the AM peak and 4 vehicles during the PM peak. The Queue Analysis indicates that the development will accommodate up to 19 vehicles within the drive-through area, which exceeds the required capacity. Further, the site and final engineering plan depicts safe and efficient means of ingress and egress into and out of the neighborhood and adequately addresses the impact of projected traffic on the immediate neighborhood, traffic circulation patterns for the neighborhood, and traffic flow through immediate intersections and arterials. (8) Whether the proposed site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land will have an adverse impact on housing and social conditions, including variety of housing unit types and prices, and neighborhood quality. Analysis: As a commercial project, the proposed site and final engineering plan will not have an adverse impact on the variety of housing unit types and prices. As for neighborhood quality, subject to the Conditions of Approval, the proposed site and 14 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M | T H U R S D A Y , N o v e m b e r 6 , 2 0 2 5 , | P A G E 6 OF 16 final engineering plan development will not have an adverse impact on neighborhood quality. (9) Whether the proposed site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land avoids significant adverse odor, emission, noise, glare, and vibration impacts on adjacent and surrounding lands regarding refuse collection, service delivery, parking and loading, signs, lighting, and other site elements. Analysis: Staff finds that proposed site and final engineering plan avoids significant adverse odor, emissions, noise, glare and vibration impacts on adjacent and surrounding lands regarding refuse collection, service delivery, parking and loading, signs, lighting, and other site elements. (10) Whether the applicant has provided an acceptable security plan for the proposed establishment to be located on the site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land that addresses the safety and security needs of the establishment and its users and employees and minimizes impacts on the neighborhood, if applicable. Analysis: Staff finds the safety and security of the site Civil Plans (Figure 4) and Site Photometric Plan (Figure 9) illustrates that the parking lot and building area will be lit with lighting on site. Additionally, the fire safety plan calls out the proposed route for a fire engine to navigate the site, and the existing fire hydrant that is located south of the proposed site. Additionally, customers will not be entering the building, reducing the potential for user safety issues. (11) Whether the applicant has provided on the site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land an acceptable plan for the mass delivery of merchandise for new large footprint buildings (greater than twenty thousand (20,000) square feet) including the hours of operation for delivery trucks to come into and exit the property and surrounding neighborhood, if applicable. Analysis: Not applicable as the structure being constructed is only 510 sq. ft. and would not receive mass deliveries of merchandise. (12) Whether the applicant has demonstrated that the site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land have been designed to incorporate mitigative techniques and plans needed to prevent adverse impacts addressed in the criteria stated herein or to adjacent and surrounding uses and properties. Analysis: Staff finds that subject to the Conditions of Approval, the site and final engineering plans have been designed to incorporate mitigative techniques and plans needed to prevent the adverse impacts mentioned in the criteria on adjacent and surrounding uses and properties. (13) If the proposed conditional use is a residential use, whether the elementary, middle and high schools (K—12) that will be initially assigned to the residential project by the school district at the time the city commission considers final 15 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M | T H U R S D A Y , N o v e m b e r 6 , 2 0 2 5 , | P A G E 7 OF 16 approval of the conditional use have both sufficient capacity, are in close proximity to the project so as to make each of the assigned schools accessible and convenient (e.g., walking distance, travel time, private and public transportation, and quality of route environment) to the majority of the school population that will be drawn from the project, and promote and support the integration of future residents of the project into the existing city of Winter Springs community in a sustainable manner. Analysis: Not applicable as this is not a residential development. (14) Whether the applicant has agreed to execute a binding development agreement required by city to incorporate the terms and conditions of approval deemed necessary by the city commission including, but not limited to, any mitigative techniques and plans required by City Code. Analysis: The applicant has agreed to and is working on a binding development agreement with the City addressing terms and conditions deemed necessary by the City Commission. Water and Sewer: Public Works & Utilities Department Staff have confirmed that sufficient water and sewer capacity exists for this project. Stormwater: Not applicable for this project as no drainage was proposed for this project. The infrastructure included for the development will tie into the existing stormwater pond. That stormwater system will be private and subject to the Declaration of Conditions, Covenants, Easements, and Restrictions as recorded in the Official Records of Seminole County (ORSC), Book 8871, Page 98, as amended by the First Amendment to the same, as recorded in ORSC, Book 8964, Page 1579. These documents govern the maintenance and cost allocations among properties in the Town Center. Transportation: The applicant has provided a Traffic Impact Analysis-Queue Analysis (Figure 10), which has been reviewed by City staff. It was Staff’s finding that the model predicts this development will generate 8 vehicles during the AM peak and 4 vehicles during the PM peak. The Queueing Analysis indicates that the development will accommodate up to 19 vehicles within the drive-through area, which exceeds the required capacity. The site and final engineering plan depicts safe and efficient means of ingress and egress into and out of the neighborhood and adequately addresses the impact of projected traffic on the immediate neighborhood, traffic circulation patterns for the neighborhood, and traffic flow through immediate intersections and arterials. Additionally, sufficient roadway capacity exists for this project. The project will not cause the impacted roadway segments to exceed their adopted level of service (LOS) under the Comprehensive Plan. Parking Analysis: The Town Center does not have minimum required parking standards; however, 16 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M | T H U R S D A Y , N o v e m b e r 6 , 2 0 2 5 , | P A G E 8 O F 16 the applicant provided documentation (Figure 11) that the 7 Brew Drive-Thru Coffee shop with two (2) drive-through lanes and no interior patron area will offer a total of seven (7) spaces for full and part-time staff. Aesthetic Review: Pursuant to Section 9-603, which sets forth guidelines and minimum standards for Aesthetic Review packages, staff have utilized the criteria below in Section 9-603 to determine the following. The attached Aesthetic Review package (Figures 13, 14, and 19 includes all of the submittal requirements for aesthetic review as set forth in Section 9-600 through 9-607 and include the following: (a) a site plan; (b) elevations illustration all sides of structures facing public streets or spaces; (c) illustrations o f all walls, fences, and other accessory structures and the indication of height and their associated materials; (d) elevation of proposed exterior permanent signs or other constructed elements other than habitable space, if any; (e) illustrations of materials, texture, and colors to be used on all buildings, accessory structures, exterior signs; and (f) other architectural and engineering data as may be required. The procedures for review and approval are set forth in Section 9-603. Aesthetic Review 1. The plans and specifications of the proposed project indicate that the setting, landscaping, proportions, materials, colors, texture, scale, unity, balance, rhythm, contrast, and simplicity are coordinated in a harmonious manner relevant to the project, surrounding area and cultural character of the community. Analysis: Staff finds that all architectural and landscaping elements are coordinated in a harmonious manner relevant to the particular proposal, the surrounding area, and cultural character of the community. 2. The plans for the proposed project are in harmony with any future development which has been formally approved by the city within the surrounding area. Analysis: Staff finds that subject to the Conditions of Approval, the plans for the proposed project are in harmony with the Town Center District Code. 3. The plans for the proposed project are not excessively similar or dissimilar to any other building, structure or sign which is either fully constructed, permitted but not fully constructed, or included on the same permit application, and facing upon the same or intersecting street within five hundred (500) feet of the proposed site, with respect to one or more of the following features of exterior design and appearance: a. Front or side elevations; b. Size and arrangement of elevation facing the street, including reverse arrangement; or c. Other significant features of design such as, but not limited to materials, roof line, hardscape improvements, and height or design elements. 17 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M | T H U R S D A Y , N o v e m b e r 6 , 2 0 2 5 , | P A G E 9 OF 16 Analysis: The plans for this project are not excessively similar or dissimilar to other projects within 500 feet of the proposed project with the proposed color scheme and materials being harmonious with the buildings in the surrounding area. 4. The plans for the proposed project are in harmony with, or significantly enhance, the established character of other buildings, structures or signs in the surrounding area with respect to architectural specifications and design features deemed significant based upon commonly accepted architectural principles of the local community. Analysis: As previously mentioned, the project has been reviewed under the Town Center District Code standards, ensuring conformance with the high standard of development for Town Center. The proposed color scheme and materials, Staff does find the exterior design and color to enhance the aesthetic impact of the project as compatible with other developments along SR 434. 5. The proposed project has incorporated significant architectural enhancements such as concrete masonry units with stucco, wrought iron, columns and piers, porches, arches, planting areas, display windows, and other distinctive design features detailing and promoting the character of the community. Analysis: The project significantly meets the standards, with the building’s primary exterior consisting of brick and aluminum with the signature red and black for the 7 Brew Drive-Thru Coffee sign on the front façade of the building. The proposed building represents a positive addition to the City of Winter Springs, and is a high quality, unique design that is harmonious with its surroundings and will add value to the proposed location. The proposed project is designed to contribute significantly to the quality architectural styles that are typical of the Town Center and the surrounding area. Reports: The Final Engineering submittal is required to include the following reports or updates of previously prepared reports for the same property. Reports December 13, 2024 Environmental Report (Figure 8) December 19, 2024 Geotechnical Report (Figure 9) October 7, 2025 Traffic Impact Analysis-Queue Analysis Report (Figure 10) 18 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M | T H U R S D A Y , N o v e m b e r 6 , 2 0 2 5 , | P A G E 10 OF 16 Procedural History: January 27, 2025 Pre-Application Meeting June 10, 2025 Community Workshop November 6, 2025 Planning & Zoning Board | Recommendation on Site/Final Engineering, Aesthetic Review, Waiver, and Development Agreement. December 8, 2025 City Commission | Hearing on Final Engineering Site/Final Engineering, Aesthetic Review, Waiver, and Development Agreement. Waiver Review: Pursuant to Section 20-34, Any real property owner may file a waiver application requesting a waiver (s) for their real property from any term and condition of this chapter (except from the list of permitted, conditional and prohibited uses set forth in any zoning district category). The Planning and Zoning Board shall be required to review all waiver applications and make a written recommendation to the City Commission. Such recommendation shall include the reasons for the board's recommendation and show the board has considered the applicable waiver criteria set forth and analyzed below. Upon receipt of the Planning and Zoning board's recommendation, the city commission shall make a final decision on the application. If the city commission determines that the planning and zoning board has not made a recommendation on an application within a reasonable period, the city commission may, at its discretion, consider an application without the planning and zoning board's recommendation. Waiver I: A waiver to allow 7 Brew Drive-Thru Coffee to be located at a setback of 68.37’ from the right-of-way of SR 434 in lieu of the 50’ maximum front setback. Waiver Review 1. The applicant clearly demonstrates that the applicable term or condition clearly creates an illogical, impossible, impractical, or patently unreasonable result related to the proposed property and development. Analysis: Staff find that the applicant demonstrated that the 50’ setback requirement creates an impractical result in that it would not permit the lot to meet other requirements for fire access when coupled with the need to include a 510 sf building, necessary parking for staff, and two (2) drive- through lanes for customers. The difference in 18.37 feet allows the applicant to provide enough width for the two (2) drive-through aisles as well as the building, and the parking on a smaller lot within the Blake Commons. 2. The proposed development plan is in substantial compliance with this chapter and in compliance with the comprehensive plan. 19 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M | T H U R S D A Y , N o v e m b e r 6 , 2 0 2 5 , | P A G E 11 OF 16 Analysis: Staff find that the proposed setback adjustment is substantially compliant with the Town Center setback standards as it will accommodate the necessary access for a coffee shop that is solely a drive-through with no indoor/outdoor seating and is in compliance with the comprehensive plan. 3. The proposed development plan will significantly enhance real property. Analysis: Staff find that the proposed site plan will significantly enhance the real property by providing an additional coffee shop option which will enhance the value of surrounding property and provide families who live and work near Town Center. 4. The proposed development plan serves the public health, safety, and welfare. Analysis: Staff find that the construction of 7 Brew Drive-Thru Coffee will serve the public health, safety, and welfare of area residents. 5. The waiver will not diminish property values in or alter the essential character of the surrounding neighborhood. Analysis: Staff find that the waiver will not diminish property values or the essential character of the surrounding neighborhood. The Town Center is meant to be a mixed-use of commercial and residential to serve residents and visitors. The construction of 7 Brew Drive-Thru Coffee will enhance property values and the essential character by increasing coffee shop options in Town Center. 6. The waiver granted is the minimum waiver that will eliminate or reduce the illogical, impossible, impractical, or patently unreasonable result caused by the applicable term or condition under this chapter. Analysis: Staff find that the waiver is the minimum waiver that will eliminate or reduce the illogical, impossible, impractical, or patently unreasonable result caused by the applicable term or condition under this chapter. The design helps to meet the associated requirements of the use while still meeting the intent of the ordinance . 7. The proposed development plan is compatible and harmonious with the surrounding neighborhood. Analysis: Staff find that the site plan is compatibl e and harmonious with the Town Center since it is similar to several building setbacks along SR 434. 8. Whether the applicant has agreed to execute a binding development agreement required by the city to incorporate the terms and conditions of approval deemed necessary by the city commission including, but not limited to, any mitigative techniques and plans required by City Code. 20 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M | T H U R S D A Y , N o v e m b e r 6 , 2 0 2 5 , | P A G E 12 O F 16 Analysis: The Applicant is working on and has agreed to a binding Development Agreement to incorporate terms and conditions deemed necessary by the City Commission. Waiver II: A waiver to Section 20-324(6), Town Center District Code, to allow a drive- through service window (door) in the side yard of the property (eastern side of building) where this section requires drive-through windows (door) to be only permitted in the rear in and alley accessed locations provided they do not substantially disrupt pedestrian activity or surrounding uses. Waiver Review 1. The applicant clearly demonstrates that the applicable term or condition clearly creates an illogical, impossible, impractical, or patently unreasonable result related to the proposed property and development . Analysis: Due to the site being adjacent to SR 434 to the south, the extension of Sea Hawk Cove to north, and the front façade of the building is required to face SR 434 the side yards are the only options to locate the drive-through service door. Further, 7 Brew Drive-Thru Coffee provides only drive-through services with the ingress/egress located at the extension of Sea Hawk Cove, and having the drive-thru on the east side yard of the building/site makes for the best traffic flow. 2. The proposed development plan is in substantial compliance with this chapter and in compliance with the comprehensive plan . Analysis: Staff finds that the proposed development plan is substantially compliant with the Code requirements and the desired goals for the Town Center as described in the Comprehensive Planas the proposed location for the drive-through service door would be screened by the supplemental landscaping for the site. 3. The proposed development plan will significantly enhance the real property. Analysis: Staff finds that the proposed development plan will significantly enhance the real property by providing an additional coffee shop option which will enhance the value of surrounding property and provide families who live and work near Town Center. 4. The proposed development plan serves the public health, safety, and welfare. Analysis: Staff finds that the design and aesthetics of this project will serve the public health, safety, and welfare of area residents. 5. The waiver will not diminish property values in or alter the essential character of the surrounding neighborhood . Analysis: Staff finds that the waiver will not diminish property values or the essential character of the surrounding neighborhood. Landscaping along 21 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M | T H U R S D A Y , N o v e m b e r 6 , 2 0 2 5 , | P A G E 13 OF 16 S.R. 434 will help buffer the drive-through and vehicular activity. The unique building design and layout will further enhance the area, adding to the diversity of architecture. 6. The waiver granted is the minimum waiver that will eliminate or reduce the illogical, impossible, impractical, or patently unreasonable result caused by the applicable term or condition under this chapter . Analysis: Staff finds that this is the minimum waiver that will eliminate or reduce the illogical, impossible, impractical, or patently unreasonable result caused by the applicable term or condition under this chapter. This design best suits drive-through traffic flow on this lot. 7. The proposed development plan is compatible and harmonious with the surrounding neighborhood. Analysis: Staff finds that the site plan is compatible with the Town Center and the buildings along SR 434. 8. Whether the applicant has agreed to execute a binding development agreement required by the city to incorporate the terms and conditions of approval deemed necessary by the city commission including, but not limited to, any mitigative techniques and plans required by City Code . Analysis: The Applicant is working on and has agreed to a binding Development Agreement to incorporate terms and conditions deemed necessary by the City Commission. Waiver III: A waiver to allow variations in the streetscape width and sequencing requirements for 7 Brew Drive-Thru Coffee, consisting of a 19.5’ landscape and treescape area adjacent to the SR 434 right-of-way, a 5.8’ sidewalk, and a 3’ landscape area adjacent to SR 434. Waiver Review 1. The applicant clearly demonstrates that the applicable term or condition clearly creates an illogical, impossible, impractical, or patently unreasonable result related to the proposed property and development. Analysis: Staff find that the applicant clearly demonstrates that the applicable conditions create an illogical, impossible, impractical, or patently unreasonable result related to the Town Center streetscape requirements. Additionally, maintaining the existing dimensions would be in keeping with adjacent parcels, which also sought waivers for the landscaping designs 2. The proposed development plan is in substantial compliance with this chapter and in compliance with the comprehensive plan. Analysis: Staff find that the variations in the streetscape section widths are substantially compliant with the Code requirements and the desired goals for the Town Center as described in the Comprehensive Plan. The 22 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M | T H U R S D A Y , N o v e m b e r 6 , 2 0 2 5 , | P A G E 14 OF 16 streetscape maintains the 27’ overall width as required by the ordinance while adjusting the sections to be harmonious with the streetscapes on adjacent parcels. 3. The proposed development plan will significantly enhance the real property. Analysis: Staff find that the proposed variations on the streetscape will significantly enhance the real property by enhancing the overall appearance of the streetscape. The applicant is proposing a number of canopy trees and shrubs beyond what is required that will improve the aesthetic value of the property. 4. The proposed development plan serves the public health, safety, and welfare. Analysis: Staff find that the plan services the public health, safety, and welfare. The proposed streetscape will increase the quality of life for residents and visitors by maintaining the current path and providing a more aesthetically pleasing walkway. 5. The waiver will not diminish property values in or alter the essential character of the surrounding neighborhood. Analysis: Staff find that the waiver will not diminish property values or the essential character of the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed waiver does not affect the location of the sidewalk along SR 434 and if anything, enhances the aesthetics of the lot, thereby increasing property values and being more in-keeping with the character of the neighborhood. 6. The waiver granted is the minimum waiver that will eliminate or reduce the illogical, impossible, impractical, or patently unreasonable result caused by the applicable term or condition under this chapter. Analysis: Staff find that this waiver eliminate or reduce the illogical, impossible, impractical, or patently unreasonable result caused by the applicable conditions in the Code. The proposed waiver keeps the current landscape and sidewalk widths so as to be harmonious with the existing streetscape on adjacent parcels. The total required width of the streetscape as required by the Code will be unaffected. 7. The proposed development plan is compatible and harmonious with the surrounding neighborhood. Analysis: Staff find that the proposed development plan is compatible and harmonious with the surrounding neighborhood. While the widths of each section as proposed are not within the Code, they are compatible with the streetscape for the adjacent parcels and the amount of both canopy trees, shrubs, and plantings will result in a harmonious landscape for the surrounding neighborhood. 8. Whether the applicant has agreed to execute a binding development agreement required by the city to incorporate the terms and conditions of 23 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M | T H U R S D A Y , N o v e m b e r 6 , 2 0 2 5 , | P A G E 15 OF 16 approval deemed necessary by the city commission including, but not limited to, any mitigative techniques and plans required by City Code. Analysis: The Applicant is working on and has agreed to a binding Development Agreement to incorporate terms and conditions deemed necessary by the City Commission. Applicable Law, Public Policy, and Events: Florida Statutes 163.2511-163.3246: Growth Policy; County and Municipal Planning; Land Development Regulation (Provides that land development regulations for municipal planning be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan). Home Rule Powers Code of Ordinances City of Winter Springs. Section 20-1. Definitions. Fiscal Impact: The Fiscal Impact Report shall be reviewed and approved prior to the project being heard before the City Commission. Development Agreement: The Applicant is currently working with the City Attorney on the Development Agreement for the project. The Development Agreement shall be executed prior to any work on the project covered within this document. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Board recommend approval of the Site/Final Engineering, Aesthetic Review, Waivers, and Development Agreement, subject to the following conditions of approval: 1. Execution of the Development Agreement. 2. All grass on the Property shall be Bahia grass. No St. Augustine grass or grass types with low drought tolerance shall be permitted. 3. Economic Impact analysis required before City Commission Public Hearing. Attachments: Figure “1” – Community Workshop Flyer Figure “2” – Community Workshop Attendance Sheet Figure “3” – Lot 2 Survey Figure “4” – 7 Brew Civil Site Plan Figure “5“– Landscape Plan Figure “6” – Irrigation Plan 10.24.25 Figure “7” – Site Photometric Plan Figure “8 “– Environmental Report Figure “9“– Geotechnical Report 24 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M | T H U R S D A Y , N o v e m b e r 6 , 2 0 2 5 , | P A G E 16 O F 16 Figure “10” – Traffic Impact Analysis-Queue Analysis Figure “11” – Parking Letter Figure “12” – Letter of Intent Figure “13” – Architectural Elevations Figure “14” – Architectural Elevation Renderings Figure “15” – Setback Waiver Description Figure “16” – Service Window Waiver Description Figure “17” – Streetscape Waiver Description Figure “18” – Site Plan Application Figure “19” – Aesthetic Application Figure “20” – Development Agreement Figure “21” – Setback Waiver Application Figure “22” – Service Window Waiver Application Figure “23” – Streetscape Waiver Application 25 7 Brew Drive-Thru Coffee Jenale Garnett, MURP, MPA Senior Planner Planning & Zoning Board 26 Background COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Property Address: 1248 E State Road 434, Winter Springs, FL 32708 (± 0.5 acres) Parcel ID: 26-20-30-5AR-0A00-007L January 7, 2024: Preapplication Meeting (PREM-2025-0017) March 13, 2025: Site Plan Application (FEDP-2025-0012) Aesthetic Application (AERV-2025-0006) Development Agreement Application (DVAG-2025-0006) September 18, 2025: Setback Waiver Application (WAIV-2025-0016) October 21, 2025: Service Window Waiver Application (WAIV-2025-0018) Streetscape Waiver Application (WAIV-2025-0017) October 13, 2025: Public Notice Letters October 20, 2025: Public Notice Signage Applicant: Erin Dudley, CEI EngineeringNovember 6, 2025 AGENDA ITEM 400 Planning & Zoning Board 7 B r e w D r i v e -Th r u C o f f e e FE D P -20 2 5 -00 1 2 27 Background COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTNovember 6, 2025 AGENDA ITEM 400 Planning & Zoning Board 7 B r e w D r i v e -Th r u C o f f e e FE D P -20 2 5 -00 1 2 •Located at corner of State Road 434 and Michael Black Blvd. •Proposal is to develop a 7 Brew Drive-Thru Coffee at The Blake Commons to include a 510 sq. ft. coffee shop with two (2) drive-through lanes and 262 sq. ft. cooler/storage. •Property is zoned Town Center District, T-5 Transect. •Applicant has submitted a Final Engineering/Site Plan application, an Aesthetic Review Application, a Development Agreement Application, and three Waiver Applications. 28 Site Plan AGENDA ITEM 400 Planning & Zoning Board November 6, 2025 AGENDA ITEM 400 Planning & Zoning Board 7 B r e w D r i v e -Th r u C o f f e e FE D P -20 2 5 -00 1 2 29 Landscape Plan AGENDA ITEM 400 Planning & Zoning Board November 6, 2025 AGENDA ITEM 400 Planning & Zoning Board 7 B r e w D r i v e -Th r u C o f f e e FE D P -20 2 5 -00 1 2 30 Elevations COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTNovember 6, 2025 AGENDA ITEM 400 Planning & Zoning Board 7 B r e w D r i v e -Th r u C o f f e e FE D P -20 2 5 -00 1 2 Rear Front 31 Elevations COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTNovember 6, 2025 AGENDA ITEM 400 Planning & Zoning Board 7 B r e w D r i v e -Th r u C o f f e e FE D P -20 2 5 -00 1 2 Left Right 32 Proposed Conditions COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Staff recommends the Planning & Zoning Board approve FEDP-2024-0012 9 (site plan), AERV-2025-0006 (aesthetic), the 3 Waivers (WAIV-2025-0016, WAIV-2025- 0017, WAIV-2025-0018), and DVAG-2025-0006 (development agreement) subject to the following conditions: 1.Execution of the Development Agreement. 2.All grass on the Property shall be Bahia grass. No St. Augustine grass or grass types with low drought tolerance shall be permitted. 3.Economic Impact analysis required before City Commission Public Hearing. AGENDA ITEM 400 Planning & Zoning Board November 6, 2025 7 B r e w D r i v e -Th r u C o f f e e FE D P -20 2 5 -00 1 2 33 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTNovember 6, 2025 AGENDA ITEM 400 Planning & Zoning Board ANY QUESTIONS? 7 B r e w D r i v e -Th r u C o f f e e FE D P -20 2 5 -00 1 2 34 City of Winter Springs / Tuskawilla Retail Partners II, LLC Development Agreement – Second Modification Page 1 of 11 THIS INSTRUMENT WAS PREPARED BY AND SHOULD BE RETURNED TO: Anthony A. Garganese City Attorney of Winter Springs Garganese, Weiss, D'Agresta & Salzman, P.A. 111 N. Orange Avenue, Suite 2000 Orlando, FL 32802 (407) 425-9566 SECOND MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT TUSKAWILLA RETAIL PARTNERS II, LLC (Lot 2 Commercial Development - Seven Brew at The Blake Commons) THIS SECOND MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made and entered this _______ day of _____________________, 2025, by and between the CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, a Florida Municipal Corporation (“City"), whose address is 1126 East S.R. 434, Winter Springs, Florida 32708, and TUSKAWILLA RETAIL PARTNERS II, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company with its principal address at 880 Glenwood Ave, Suite H, Atlanta, GA 30316 (“Developer”). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, Developer is the fee simple owner of certain real property located in the City of Winter Springs consisting of 8.11 acres, more or less, located Southeast of the corner of Michael Blake Boulevard and East State Road 434, as more particularly described herein (the “Property”); and WHEREAS, the Property is subject to that certain Development Agreement dated March 10, 2015, and recorded in the Official Records of Seminole County at Official Record Book 8446 Page 1131, as modified by the First Modification of Development Agreement dated January 9, 2017, and recorded in the Official Records of Seminole County at Official Record Book 8852 Page 1719 (the “Original Development Agreements”); and WHEREAS, the Property is also subject to that certain Tuskawilla Retail Partners II Development Agreement (Blake Commons), dated August 25, 2025, and recorded in the Official Records of Seminole County at Official Record Book 10887, Pages 649-660 (the “Development Agreement”); and FOR RECORDING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY 35 City of Winter Springs / Tuskawilla Retail Partners II, LLC Development Agreement – Second Modification Page 2 of 11 WHEREAS, the Property is also subject to that certain First Modification to the Tuskawilla Retail Partners II Development Agreement, which provides for the construction of a daycare project on Lot 3 of the Blake Commons plat, dated _________________ and recorded in the Official Records of Seminole County at Official Record Book _____ Pages _________ (the “First Modification Development Agreement”); and WHEREAS, Developer has applied for Final Engineering/Site Plan Approval, Aesthetic Plan Approval, and Waivers from the City Code to construct an approximately 510 square foot, two-lane drive-through Seven Brew coffee shop with no indoor or outdoor seating on Lot 2 of the Blake Commons plat, an approximately 0.50-acre parcel located on the southeastern portion of the Property; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 20, Zoning, Article II, Division 1, Section 20-29.1 of the Winter Springs City Code (“City Code”), public hearing notices were mailed to all owners of real property adjacent to and within approximately five-hundred (500) feet of the subject property and all Homeowner’s Associations on file within the City of Winter Springs on October 13, 2025, and a Community Workshop for the Project was held on June 10, 2025; and WHEREAS, Section 20-29(c) of the City Code requires that all site plans shall be binding on the use of the subject property and, further, that as a condition of approval by the City Commission, all development projects requiring a community workshop pursuant to Section 20- 29.1 of the City Code shall be required to be memorialized in a binding development agreement; and WHEREAS, this Development Agreement shall be recorded against the Project Area so that the terms and conditions of approval related to the Project shall run with the land; and NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties mutually agree as follows: 1.0 Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated herein by this reference. 2.0 Authority. This Agreement is entered into pursuant to the Florida Municipal Home Rule Powers Act. 3.0 The Project Area. The real property subject to this Agreement consists of Lot 2 of the Blake Commons plat and is legal described in EXHIBIT “A,” attached hereto and fully incorporated herein by this reference (the “Project Area”). 4.0 Project Description and Requirements. Developer shall, at its expense, design, permit and construct an approximately 510 square foot, two-lane drive-through Seven Brew coffee shop with no indoor or outdoor seating at the Project Area (the “Project”). The supporting infrastructure shall be constructed in accordance with the Blake Commons/Sea Hawk 36 City of Winter Springs / Tuskawilla Retail Partners II, LLC Development Agreement – Second Modification Page 3 of 11 Cove Extension final engineering plans as approved in the Development Agreement for the Blake Commons in a single phase and simultaneously with the Seven Brew Project and any associated parking. (Hereinafter the project description and requirements are referred to as the “Project”). The Developer shall construct the Project in a manner consistent with the approved Final Engineering/Site Plans, Aesthetic Plans, and Waivers that are on file with the City with the following file numbers and consistent with the requirements contained in this Agreement: File No.: FEDP-2025-0012 File No.: AERV-2025-0006 File No.: WAIV-2025-0016 File No.: WAIV-2025-0017 File No.: WAIV-2025-0018 For convenience, a copy of the Overall Site Plan is attached hereto and fully incorporated herein by this reference as Exhibit “B.” Specific conditions of approval for the above-referenced Site/Final Engineering Plans, Aesthetic Review and Waivers include the following, which are also addressed in the staff report for the Final Engineering/Site Plans, Aesthetic Plans, and Waivers: 1. Approval of the Project is conditioned upon and contingent upon approval of the Blake Commons final engineering plans, which provide for access, utilities, and stormwater drainage to the subject site. 2. An Economic Impact Analysis Report as required by the Town Center Design standards shall be reviewed and approved prior to the project being heard before the City Commission. 3. All grass areas on the Project Area shall use Bahia grass. No St. Augustine grass or grass types with low drought tolerance shall be permitted. 5.0 Future Permitting. Developer shall be required to receive building permits and substantially commence vertical construction of buildings, which shall at minimum include building foundations, for the Project within two (2) years of the Effective Date of this Agreement. 6.0 Representations of the Parties. The City and Developer hereby each represent and warrant to the other that it has the power and authority to execute, deliver and perform the terms and provisions of this Agreement and has taken all necessary action to authorize the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement. This Agreement will, when duly executed 37 City of Winter Springs / Tuskawilla Retail Partners II, LLC Development Agreement – Second Modification Page 4 of 11 and delivered by the City and Developer, constitute a legal, valid and binding obligation enforceable against the parties hereto. Upon recording of this Agreement in the Public Records of Seminole County, Florida, the Agreement shall be a binding obligation upon the Project Area in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Developer represents that it has voluntarily and willfully executed this Agreement for purposes of binding himself and the Project Area to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. 7.0 Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall automatically be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the City and Developer and their respective successors and assigns. The terms and conditions of this Agreement similarly shall be binding upon the Project Area, and shall run with title to the same upon being duly recorded against the Project Area by the City. 8.0 Applicable Law; Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. The venue of any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be in Seminole County, Florida or, for federal court actions, in the Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division. 9.0 Amendments. This Agreement shall not be modified or amended except by written agreement duly executed by both parties hereto (or their successors or assigns) and approved by the City Commission. 10.0 Entire Agreement; Exhibits. This Agreement and all attached exhibits hereto supersede any other agreement, oral or written, regarding the Project Area and contain the entire agreement between the City and Developer as to the subject matter hereof. The Exhibits attached hereto and referenced herein are hereby fully incorporated herein by this reference. 11.0 Severability. If any provision of this Agreement shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable to any extent by a court of competent jurisdiction, the same shall not affect in any respect the validity or enforceability of the remainder of this Agreement. 12.0 Effective Date. This Agreement shall become effective upon approval by the City Commission and execution of this Agreement by both parties hereto. 13.0 Recordation. Upon full execution by the Parties, this Agreement shall be recorded in the Public Records of Seminole County, Florida by the City. The Developer shall be responsible for all recording fees associated with this Agreement. 14.0 Relationship of the Parties. The relationship of the parties to this Agreement is contractual and Developer is an independent contractor and not an agent of the City. Nothing herein shall be deemed to create a joint venture or principal-agent relationship between the parties, and neither party is authorized to, nor shall either party act toward third persons or the public in any manner, which would indicate any such relationship with the other. 15.0 Sovereign Immunity. The City intends to avail itself of sovereign immunity and other applicable limitations on City liability whenever deemed applicable by the City. Therefore, 38 City of Winter Springs / Tuskawilla Retail Partners II, LLC Development Agreement – Second Modification Page 5 of 11 notwithstanding any other provision set forth in this Agreement, nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed as a waiver of the City’s right to sovereign immunity under section 768.28, Florida Statutes, or other limitations imposed on the City’s potential liability under state or federal law. As such, the City shall not be liable under this Agreement for punitive damages or interest for the period before judgment. Further, the City shall not be liable for any claim or judgment, or portion thereof, to any one person for more than two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000.00), or any claim or judgment, or portion thereof, which, when totaled with all other claims or judgments paid by the State or its agencies and subdivisions arising out of the same incident or occurrence, exceeds the sum of three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000.00). 16.0 City's Police Power. Developer agrees and acknowledges that the City hereby reserves all police powers granted to the City by law. In no way shall this Agreement be construed as the City bargaining away or surrendering its police powers. 17.0 Interpretation. The parties hereby agree and acknowledge that they have both participated equally in the drafting of this Agreement and no party shall be favored or disfavored regarding the interpretation to this Agreement in the event of a dispute between the parties. 18.0 Third-Party Rights. This Agreement is not a third-party beneficiary contract and shall not in any way whatsoever create any rights on behalf of any third party. 19.0 Specific Performance and Enforcement. Strict compliance shall be required with each and every provision of this Agreement. The parties agree that failure to perform the obligations provided by this Agreement shall result in irreparable damage and that specific performance of these obligations may be obtained by a suit in equity. The failure to timely comply with any mandatory condition of this Agreement shall further constitute a violation of the City’s Code of Ordinances and shall be subject to enforcement action as described therein including, but not limited to, enforcement before the City’s Code Enforcement Board under Chapter 2, Article III, Division 2. – Code Enforcement. 20.0 Attorney's Fees. In connection with any arbitration or litigation arising out of this Agreement, each party shall be responsible for their own attorney’s fees and costs. 21.0 Development Permits. Nothing herein shall limit the City's authority to grant or deny any development permit applications or requests subsequent to the effective date of this Agreement in accordance with the criteria of the City Code and the requirements of this Agreement. The failure of this Agreement to address any particular City, County, State and/or Federal permit, condition, term or restriction shall not relieve Developer or the City of the necessity of complying with the law governing said permitting requirement, condition, term or restriction. Without imposing any limitation on the City’s police powers, the City reserves the right to withhold, suspend or terminate any and all certificates of occupancy for any building, trailer, structure or unit if Developer is in breach of any term and condition of this Agreement. 22.0 Default. Failure by either party to perform each and every one of its obligations hereunder shall constitute a default, entitling the non-defaulting party to pursue 39 City of Winter Springs / Tuskawilla Retail Partners II, LLC Development Agreement – Second Modification Page 6 of 11 whatever remedies are available to it under Florida law or equity including, without limitation, termination of this Agreement, an action for specific performance, and/or injunctive relief. Prior to any party filing any action as a result of a default under this Agreement, the non-defaulting party shall first provide the defaulting party with written notice of said default. Upon receipt of said notice, the defaulting party shall be provided a thirty (30) day opportunity in which to cure the default to the reasonable satisfaction of the non-defaulting party prior to filing said action. 23.0 Termination. The City shall have the unconditional right, but not obligation, to terminate this Agreement, without notice or penalty, if Developer fails to receive building permits and substantially commence vertical construction of buildings, which shall at minimum include building foundations, for the Project within two (2) years of the effective date of this Agreement. The Developer may apply to the City Commission for an extension of this Agreement, which may be granted upon good cause shown. In addition, the City shall have the right, but not obligation, to terminate the Agreement if Developer permanently abandons construction of the Project, provided, however, the City shall first deliver written notice and an opportunity to cure to the defaulting party as set forth in Section 22 above. If the City terminates this Agreement, the City shall record a notice of termination against the Project Area in the public records of Seminole County, Florida. 24.0 Indemnification and Hold Harmless. Developer shall be solely responsible for designing, permitting, constructing, operating and maintaining this Project. As such, Developer hereby agrees to indemnify, release, and hold harmless the City and its commissioners, employees and attorneys from and against all claims, losses, damages, personal injuries (including, but not limited to, death), or liability (including reasonable attorney’s fees and costs through all appellate proceedings), directly or indirectly arising from, out of, or caused by Developer and Developer’s contractor’s and subcontractor’s performance of design, permit and construction, and maintenance activities in furtherance of constructing the Project and maintaining the improvements of this Project. This indemnification shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 25.0 Force Majeure. The parties agree that in the event that the failure by either party to accomplish any action required hereunder within a specified time period (“Time Period”) constitutes a default under the terms of this Agreement and, if any such failure is due to ac ts of God, acts of government authority (other than the City’s own reasonable acts), acts of public enemy or war, riots, civil disturbances, power failure, shortages of labor or materials, injunction or other court proceedings beyond the control of such party, or severe adverse weather conditions (“Force Majeure Event”), then, notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, that failure shall not constitute a default under this Agreement and any Time Period proscribed hereunder shall be extended by the amount of time that such party was unable to perform solely due to the Force Majeure Event. The extended Time Period shall be agreed to in writing by the parties and said agreement shall not be unreasonably withheld by either party. The City Manager shall have the authority to grant an extended Time Period. An extension of any Time Period for reasons of a Force Majeure Event shall be requested solely as provided in this Section. Developer hereby waives and relinquishes the right to notify the City of the intent to exercise the tolling and extension of any permit related to the Project, including Time Periods under this Agreement, 40 City of Winter Springs / Tuskawilla Retail Partners II, LLC Development Agreement – Second Modification Page 7 of 11 development orders, and building permits, available under Section 252.363, Florida Statutes, as the result of a declaration of a state of emergency issued by the Governor for a natural emergency. 26. Notice. Whenever either party desires to give notice to the other, notice shall be sent by hand delivery or certified mail, return receipt requested, and shall be sent to: For the City: City Manager City of Winter Springs 1126 East S.R. 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 With additional notice to: Anthony A. Garganese, City Attorney Garganese, Weiss, D’Agresta & Salzman, P.A. 111 N. Orange Avenue, Suite 2000 Orlando, FL 32802 For Developer: Tuskawilla Retail Partners II, LLC 4400 Marsh Landing Blvd, Suite 203 Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida 32082 Phone: (678) 515-5376 Email: robm@catalystdp.com Either party may freely modify their respective contact person and address contained in this Paragraph by providing written notice of the modification to the other party. Any Notice given as provided herein shall be deemed received as follows: if delivered by personal service, on the date so delivered; and if mailed, on the third business day after mailing. 27.0 Assignment. Prior to completing the construction of the Project and reaching final build-out of the Project, Developer shall not assign this Agreement without the prior written consent of the City which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. . Such assignment shall require the written approval of the City by amendment to this Agreement, which shall not require a public hearing and shall not be unreasonably withheld. However, Developer shall be entitled to assign its rights and obligations under this Agreement to a parent, subsidiary, or affiliated entity in which Developer or its members are members or interest holders without City consent, provided that the City is given notice of such assignment in accordance with Section 26.0 herein. Any assignment authorized by this subparagraph shall require the assignee to be a formal signatory to this Agreement and fully assume all of Developer’s obligations, 41 City of Winter Springs / Tuskawilla Retail Partners II, LLC Development Agreement – Second Modification Page 8 of 11 commitments, representations, and warranties under this Agreement. In any assignment, the rights and obligations contained herein shall be binding on successors in interest to the Project Area, and the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and any respective successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands and seal on the date first above written. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS By: Kevin McCann, Mayor ATTEST: By: Christian Gowan, City Clerk Date:________________________________ CITY SEAL APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY For the use and reliance of the City of Winter Springs, Florida only. Date: By: Anthony A. Garganese, City Attorney for the City of Winter Springs, Florida 42 City of Winter Springs / Tuskawilla Retail Partners II, LLC Development Agreement – Second Modification Page 9 of 11 Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of the following witnesses: Signature of Witness Printed Name of Witness ______________________________ Address of Witness ______________________________ Signature of Witness Printed Name of Witness _____________________________________________ Address of Witness TUSKAWILLA RETAIL PARTNERS II, LLC, a Florida limited liability company Print name: ________________________ Title:_____________________________ Date: _____________________, 2025 STATE OF COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of [_] physical presence or [_] online notarization, this ______ day of ___________, 2025, by____________________, the __________________of TUSKAWILLA RETAIL PARTNERS, II, LLC, a limited liability company, on behalf of the company, who is personally known to me or produced __________________________________ as identification. 43 City of Winter Springs / Tuskawilla Retail Partners II, LLC Development Agreement – Second Modification Page 10 of 11 (NOTARY SEAL) (Notary Public Signature) (Print Name) Notary Public, State of Commission No.: My Commission Expires: DEVELOPER IS HEREBY ADVISED THAT SHOULD DEVELOPER FAIL TO FULLY EXECUTE, AND DELIVER TO THE CITY, THIS AGREEMENT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE DATE THAT THE CITY COMMISSION APPROVES THIS AGREEMENT, THIS AGREEMENT, AND THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPROVALS REFERENCED HEREUNDER, SHALL AUTOMATICALLY BE DEEMED NULL AND VOID. 44 City of Winter Springs / Tuskawilla Retail Partners II, LLC Development Agreement – Second Modification Page 11 of 11 EXHIBIT A PROJECT AREA LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 2 of the Blake Commons plat, recorded in the Plat Book of Seminole County, Book 91, Page 65. EXHIBIT B OVERALL SITE PLAN 45 COMMUNITY WORKSHOP Date: June 10, 2025 @ 6:00 P.M. Location: The Foundry Church – Classroom 5 1491 E. State Road 434, Winter Springs, FL 32708 Community Workshop to consider Final Engineering Site Plans, Aesthetic Review, and Development Agreement in order to construct a 510 square foot drive through coffee shop in the Sea Hawk Cove Extension project within the Town Center District on the subject site. Project: 7-Brew Drive Thru Coffee Shop Location: SE corner of E. State Road 434 and Michael Blake Blvd. Parcel ID: 26-20-30-5AR-0A00-007L Acreage: ± 0.50-acre project (±8.03-acre parcel) Zoning: Town Center District (T5) Future Land Use: Town Center (TC) Applicant/Presenter: ERIN DUDLEY-CIVIL PROJECT MANAGER, CEI ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES INC. 46 47 48 49 50 PLAN INDEX: ASSOCIATED PLANS: RESOURCE LIST: SURVEY 3 OF 3 ALTA/ACSM SURVEY CEI CONTACT: CEI PROJECT NUMBER DATE PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD PROJECT MANAGER DESIGNER REVISION SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLECIVIL ENGINEERING ▪ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ▪ LAND SURVEYING ▪ PLANNING SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS CEI ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. REVISION NO.DESCRIPTION DATE C0.0 COVER SHEET REV-1 7/24/2025 34335 BWB EVD TAB BENTONVILLE | DALLAS | FRESNO | HOUSTON | JACKSONVILLE | MINNEAPOLIS | PHILADELPHIA | PHOENIX DR A W I N G L O C A T I O N - P: \ 3 4 0 0 0 \ 3 4 3 3 5 . 0 \ D R A W I N G S \ D E S I G N \ W O R K I N G \ 3 4 3 3 5 - C S . D W G - - S A V E D B Y - AM C D A N I E L © 2025 CEI ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. FAX: (479) 273-0844 PHONE: (479) 273-9472 BENTONVILLE, AR 72712 2600 NE 11TH ST, SUITE 300 WI N T E R S P R I N G S , FL O R I D A MI C H A E L B L A K E B L V D SE V E N B R E W SEVEN BREW MICHAEL BLAKE BLVD WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA GENERAL NOTES:APPROVED DATE A.TOPOGRAPHIC BOUNDARY SURVEY, INCLUDING PROPERTY LINES, LEGAL DESCRIPTION, EXISTING UTILITIES, SITE TOPOGRAPHY WITH SPOT ELEVATIONS, OUTSTANDING PHYSICAL FEATURES AND EXISTING STRUCTURE LOCATIONS WAS PROVIDED BY THE FOLLOWING COMPANY, AS A CONTRACTOR TO THE SELLER/OWNER: TOPOGRAPHY & BOUNDARY:SOUTHEASTERN SURVEYING AND MAPPING CORPORATION 6500 ALL AMERICAL BOULEVARD ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32810-4350 PH: (407) 292-8580 CEI ENGINEERING AND ITS ASSOCIATES WILL NOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE SURVEY OR FOR DESIGN ERRORS OR OMISSIONS RESULTING FROM SURVEY INACCURACIES. B.ALL PHASES OF SITE WORK FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL MEET OR EXCEED THE OWNER / DEVELOPER SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS. C.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMOVAL OF EXISTING STRUCTURES, RELATED UTILITIES, PAVING, UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS AND ANY OTHER EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS AS NOTED. SEE SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS. D.CONTRACTOR IS TO REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF ALL DEBRIS, RUBBISH AND OTHER MATERIALS RESULTING FROM PREVIOUS AND CURRENT DEMOLITION OPERATIONS. DISPOSAL WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL LOCAL, STATE AND/OR FEDERAL REGULATIONS GOVERNING SUCH OPERATIONS. E.THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR AND SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. F.WARRANTY/DISCLAIMER: THE DESIGNS REPRESENTED IN THESE PLANS ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ESTABLISHED PRACTICES OF CIVIL ENGINEERING FOR THE DESIGN FUNCTIONS AND USES INTENDED BY THE OWNER AT THIS TIME. HOWEVER, NEITHER THE ENGINEER NOR ITS PERSONNEL CAN OR DO WARRANT THESE DESIGNS OR PLANS AS CONSTRUCTED EXCEPT IN THE SPECIFIC CASES WHERE THE ENGINEER INSPECTS AND CONTROLS THE PHYSICAL CONSTRUCTION ON A CONTEMPORANEOUS BASIS AT THE SITE. G.SAFETY NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR: IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDITIONS OF THE JOB SITE, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY DURING PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. THIS REQUIREMENT WILL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. ANY CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION BY THE ENGINEER OF THE CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF THE ADEQUACY OF THE CONTRACTOR'S SAFETY MEASURES, IN, ON OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. H.ALL CONSTRUCTION IN STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT RESIDENT ENGINEER. I.RESIDENT ENGINEERING SERVICES: WHEN REQUESTED BY THE OWNER, RESIDENT ENGINEERING SERVICES SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE ENGINEERS (ON A TIME AND FREQUENCY BASIS) ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY ENGINEER FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO PUBLIC WATER MAINS, PUBLIC SEWER, AND CITY STREETS. AT THE COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION, THE ENGINEER SHALL CERTIFY THE CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. THIS WORK WILL BE AT THE OWNER/DEVELOPER'S DIRECT EXPENSE AND SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH CEI ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. IT WILL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY THE RESIDENT ENGINEER OF ANY PRECONSTRUCTION / CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCES AND ANY PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION 24 HOURS PRIOR TO SAID ACTION. FLOOD CERTIFICATION: CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA BY SCALED MAP LOCATION AND GRAPHICAL PLOTTING ONLY. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN ZONE "X" UNSHADED WHICH ARE AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN DETERMINED BY THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM, FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP FOR SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA MAP NUMBER: 12117C0160F MAP REVISED: SEPTEMBER 28, 2007 NOTICE TO BIDDERS: ALL QUESTIONS REGARDING THE PREPARATION OF THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL BE DIRECTED TO THE OWNER'S FIELD CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: KEILEN RICHARDSON 7 BREW COFFEE PHONE: (479) 709-7965 SUBCONTRACTORS MUST DIRECT THEIR QUESTIONS THROUGH THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. THE CONSULTING ARCHITECT AND/OR THE CONSULTING ENGINEER SHALL NOT BE CONTACTED DIRECTLY WITHOUT PRIOR AUTHORIZATION FROM THE OWNER/DEVELOPER. PLANNING AND ZONING CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS 1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708 TALBERT JACKSON PHONE: (407) 327-5969 EMAIL: TJACKSON@WINTERSPRINGSFL.ORG BUILDING CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS 1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708 SCHWANDA MOLINA PHONE: (407) 327-6595 EMAIL: CUSTOMERSERVICE@WINTERSPRINGSFL.COM ENGINEERING CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS 1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708 LEI XU PHONE: (407) 327-5970 STORMWATER APOPKA SERVICE CENTER 2501 S. BINION ROAD APOPKA, FL 32703 PHONE: (877) 228-1658 EMAIL: E-PERMIT@SJRWMD.COM FIRE DEPARTMENT SEMINOLE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 1101 E FIRST STREET, RM 1040 SANFORD, FL 32771 MATTHEW MAYWALD PHONE: (407) 665-5177 EMAIL: MMAYWALD@SEMINOLECOUNTYFL.GOV HEALTH DEPARTMENT FLORIDA DEPT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSURMER SERVICES 3125 CONNOR BOULEVARD, SUITE B TALLAHASSEE, FL 32399 LYDIA GONZALEZ PHONE: (850) 245-5542 EMAIL: FSPLANREVIEW@FDACS.GOV WATER AND SEWER CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS PUBLIC WORKS AND UTILITIES 1126 EAST STATE 434 WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708 PHILIP HURSH PHONE: (407) 327-7591 EXT 327 EMAIL: PHURSH@WINTERSPRINGSFL.ORG ELECTRIC DUKE ENERGY 150 PROGRESS ENERGY WAY #7672 LONGWOOD, FL 32750 MILITZA PHONE: (866) 372-4663 EMAIL: AVAYA_FLA_FEWCST@DUKE-ENERGY.COM NATURAL GAS TECO - PEOPLES GAS 600 W ROBINSON ST. ORLANDO, FL 32399 CORY VERES PHONE: (407) 426-3068 EMAIL: CAVERES@TECOENERGY.COM TELEPHONE SPECTRUM BUSINESS DARREN ANDERSON PHONE: (910) 907-5702 EMAIL: DARREN.ANDERSON@CHARTER.COM DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FL 1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708 LEI XU PHONE: (407) 327-5970 C0.0 COVER SHEET C1.0 DEMOLITION PLAN C2.0 SITE PLAN C3.0 GRADING PLAN C4.0 EROSION CONTROL PLAN C5.0 PRE MAP C5.1 POST MAP C5.2 INLET MAP C5.3 DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS 1 C5.4 DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS 2 C6.0 UTILITY PLAN C7.0 PAVING PLAN C8.0 DETAIL SHEET I C8.1 DETAIL SHEET II C8.2 DETAIL SHEET III C8.3 DETAIL SHEET IV C8.4 DETAIL SHEET V C9.0 TURNING ANALYSIS PLAN L1.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN L1.1 LANDSCAPE NOTES AND DETAILS L2.0 IRRIGATION PLAN L2.1 IRRIGATION DETAILS VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE Know what's below. before you dig.Call OWNER: 7VENTURE, LLC KEILEN RICHARDSON 688 EAST MILLSAP ROAD SUITE 200 FAYETTEVILLE, AR 72703 KRICHARDSON@KMACCORP.COM PHONE: (479) 709-7965 ARCHITECT: KINETIC DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT ASHLEY FELIU RIVERA 2215 W. CHESTERFIELD BLVD SUITE 101 SPRINGFIELD, MO 65807 ASHLEY@KINETICDD.COM PHONE: (417) 530-4321 SITE MICH A E L B L A K E B O U L E V A R D T R E E S W A L L O W D R . E A S T F L O R I D A 4 3 4 ERIN DUDLEY PROJECT MANAGER 2600 NE 11TH ST., SUITE 300 BENTONVILLE, AR 72712 EDUDLEY@CEIENG.COM PHONE: (479) 715-4123 51 S S S S S S S S S S S S S SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS D W W W W W W W W S E A H A W K C O V E - 6 2 ' R O W W W W W W W W W S S * * 701 34.98 ND TPNDSSMC.ADJ S T A T E R O A D 4 3 4 R I G H T O F W A Y V A R I E S F L O R I D A D E P A R T M E N T O F T R A N S P O R T A T I O N R I G H T O F W A Y M A P S E C T I O N 7 7 0 7 0 - 2 5 1 6 2" PVC STUB UP 5' FROM GROUND PAINTED GREEN FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD LB 8246 FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD ILLEGIBLE FOUND NAIL & DISC CPH LB 7143 HANDRAIL P O S T F O R O L D W I R E F E N C E ( T Y P I C A L ) SITE BENCHMARK SET NAIL & DISK "SSMC TRAV. PT." ELEVATION=34.98 SITE BENCHMARK SET NAIL & DISK "SSMC TRAV. PT." ELEVATION=36.87 C O N C R E T E W A L K E D G E O F P A V E M E N T N O R T H E A S T E R L Y R I G H T O F W A Y L I N E ( B E A R I N G B A S I S ) 30 35 31 32 33 34 32 33 34 3 5 3 6 3 7 3 7 35 32 33 34 36 2 " C U R B & G U T T E R N O R T H E A S T E R L Y R I G H T O F W A Y L I N E N O R T H E A S T E R L Y R I G H T O F W A Y L I N E U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T O R B 7 4 8 6 , P A G E 1 5 5 REMAINDER OF PARCEL 1 LOT 8, BLOCK A D.R. MITCHELL'S SURVEY OF THE LEVY GRANT PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 5 PARCEL ID: 26-20-30-5AR-0A00-007L TUSKAWILLA RETAIL PARTNERS II LLC REMAINDER OF PARCEL 1 LOT 8, BLOCK A D.R. MITCHELL'S SURVEY OF THE LEVY GRANT PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 5 PARCEL ID: 26-20-30-5AR-0A00-007L TUSKAWILLA RETAIL PARTNERS II LLC NORT H W E S T E R L Y L I N E O F A C Q U I S I T I O N P A R C E L B N25°10'29"W 48.66' REMAINDER OF PARCEL 1 LOT 8, BLOCK A D.R. MITCHELL'S SURVEY OF THE LEVY GRANT PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 5 PARCEL ID: 26-20-30-5AR-0A00-007L TUSKAWILLA RETAIL PARTNERS II LLC 2 5 ' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 5' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 5' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 1 5 ' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K WATER LINE WATER VALVE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE 19A51D 19A51D 19A51D SANITARY SEWER PIPE19A51D STORM SEWER PIPE19A51D CONCRETE SIDEWALK19A51D CONCRETE PAVEMENT19A CONCRETE SIDEWALK19A51D CURB AND GUTTER19A51D CURB AND GUTTER19A51D STORM SEWER INLET19A51D SANITARY SEWER PIPE 19A51D WATER LINE19A51D 51D CURB AND GUTTER 19A51D CONCRETE RAMP19A51D CONCRETE RAMP19A51D CEI PROJECT NUMBER DATE PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD PROJECT MANAGER DESIGNER REVISION SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE CEI ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. REVISION NO.DESCRIPTION DATE C1.0 DEMOLITION PLAN REV-1 10/17/2025 34335 BWB EVD TAB DR A W I N G L O C A T I O N - P: \ 3 4 0 0 0 \ 3 4 3 3 5 . 0 \ D R A W I N G S \ D E S I G N \ W O R K I N G \ 3 4 3 3 5 - S P . D W G - - S A V E D B Y - GB I N A M © 2025 CEI ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. FAX: (479) 273-0844 PHONE: (479) 273-9472 BENTONVILLE, AR 72712 2600 NE 11TH ST, SUITE 300 WI N T E R S P R I N G S , FL O R I D A MI C H A E L B L A K E B L V D SE V E N B R E W GENERAL DEMOLITION NOTES A.THE SITE WORK FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL MEET OR EXCEED THE "7BREW STANDARD SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS". B.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVAL OF THE EXISTING STRUCTURES, RELATED UTILITIES, PAVING, UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS AND ANY OTHER EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS AS NOTED. SEE SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS. C.CONTRACTOR IS TO REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF ALL DEBRIS, RUBBISH AND OTHER MATERIALS RESULTING FROM PREVIOUS AND CURRENT DEMOLITION OPERATIONS. DISPOSAL WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL LOCAL, STATE AND/OR FEDERAL REGULATIONS GOVERNING SUCH OPERATIONS. D.THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES OCCURRING DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. E.ENGINEER'S NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. F.PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION IN RIGHT-OF-WAY, CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL TRAFFIC CONTROL IN ACCORDANCE WITH MUTCD. G.ANY WORK TO TAKE PLACE OFF-SITE SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE PROPERTY OWNER. EXISTING LEGEND LEGEND -**- = SOUTHEASTERN SURVEYING & MAPPING CORPORATION D S = SET 5/8" IRON ROD SSMC LB 2108 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED = CONCRETE MONUMENT = DRAINAGE MANHOLE = HAND HOLE = NAIL W/DISC = POST/BOLLARD = SEWER VALVE = TRAFFIC SIGN ABBREVIATION LEGEND: = DEED/DESCRIPTION DATA(D) L R Δ CH CB PRM ALTA NSPS ORB PG(S) LB PSM ID TRAV.PT. SSMC = TRAVERSE POINT = IDENTIFICATION = PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER = LICENSED BUSINESS = PAGE(S) = OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK = NATIONAL SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEY = AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION = PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT = CHORD BEARING = CHORD = DELTA = RADIUS = LENGTH SYMBOL LEGEND: HATCHING LEGEND: = CURB & GUTTER = CONCRETE LINETYPE LEGEND: = WIRE FENCE VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE SITE MICH A E L B L A K E B O U L E V A R D T R E E S W A L L O W D R . E A S T F L O R I D A 4 3 4 SITE BENCHMARK BEARINGS SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHTO OF WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD 434 AS SHOWN ON THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPROTATION RIGHT OF WAY MAP SECTION 77070-2516, BEING NORTH 39°43'43" WEST. SITE BENCHMARK 1 SET NAIL & DISK "SSMC TRAV. PT." ELEVATION=36.87 SITE BENCHMARK 2 SET NAIL & DISK "SSMC TRAV. PT." ELEVATION=34.98 Know what's below. before you dig.Call 0 20'30'40' SCALE IN FEET DEMOLITION NOTES 18A EXISTING TO BE REMOVED. 19A EXISTING TO REMAIN. 51B LIMITS OF SAWCUT AND PAVEMENT REMOVAL 51D PROTECT EXISTING STRUCTURES AND/OR PIPES DURING DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION PHASES. 52 S S S S S S S S S S S S S SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS D W W W W W W W W S E A H A W K C O V E - 6 2 ' R O W W W W W W W W W S S * * 700 36.87 ND TPNDSSMC.ADJ 701 34.98 ND TPNDSSMC.ADJ 35.6 36 . 7 2 37.4 FLO R I D A T R A I L ACQ U I S I T I O N P A R C E L B ( R A I L S T O T R A I L S C O R R I D O R ) S T A T E R O A D 4 3 4 R I G H T O F W A Y V A R I E S F L O R I D A D E P A R T M E N T O F T R A N S P O R T A T I O N R I G H T O F W A Y M A P S E C T I O N 7 7 0 7 0 - 2 5 1 6 2" PVC STUB UP 5' FROM GROUND PAINTED GREEN FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD LB 8246 FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD ILLEGIBLE FOUND NAIL & DISC CPH LB 7143 HANDRAIL P O S T F O R O L D W I R E F E N C E ( T Y P I C A L ) VACANT NO IMPROVEMENT EXCEPT AS SHOWN SITE BENCHMARK SET NAIL & DISK "SSMC TRAV. PT." ELEVATION=34.98 SITE BENCHMARK SET NAIL & DISK "SSMC TRAV. PT." ELEVATION=36.87 C O N C R E T E W A L K E D G E O F P A V E M E N T N50 ° 3 7 ' 2 5 " E 1 7 0 . 6 7 ' N 3 9 ° 4 3 ' 4 3 " W 1 2 7 . 6 1 ' S50 ° 3 7 ' 2 8 " W 1 7 0 . 1 2 ' S 3 9 ° 2 8 ' 5 6 " E 1 2 7 . 6 1 ' N O R T H E A S T E R L Y R I G H T O F W A Y L I N E ( B E A R I N G B A S I S ) 2 " C U R B & G U T T E R N O R T H E A S T E R L Y R I G H T O F W A Y L I N E N O R T H E A S T E R L Y R I G H T O F W A Y L I N E U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T O R B 7 4 8 6 , P A G E 1 5 5 A PORTION OF PARCEL 1 LOT 8, BLOCK A D.R. MITCHELL'S SURVEY OF THE LEVY GRANT PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 5 PARCEL ID: 26-20-30-5AR-0A00-007L REMAINDER OF PARCEL 1 LOT 8, BLOCK A D.R. MITCHELL'S SURVEY OF THE LEVY GRANT PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 5 PARCEL ID: 26-20-30-5AR-0A00-007L TUSKAWILLA RETAIL PARTNERS II LLC REMAINDER OF PARCEL 1 LOT 8, BLOCK A D.R. MITCHELL'S SURVEY OF THE LEVY GRANT PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 5 PARCEL ID: 26-20-30-5AR-0A00-007L TUSKAWILLA RETAIL PARTNERS II LLC N24°10'06"W (D) N51 ° 3 6 ' 2 6 " E 94 . 9 4 ' ( D ) 3 6 . 9 1 ' NORT H W E S T E R L Y L I N E O F A C Q U I S I T I O N P A R C E L B N25°10'29"W 48.66' N 3 8 ° 4 3 ' 1 6 " W 3 5 7 . 6 5 ' ( D ) REMAINDER OF PARCEL 1 LOT 8, BLOCK A D.R. MITCHELL'S SURVEY OF THE LEVY GRANT PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 5 PARCEL ID: 26-20-30-5AR-0A00-007L TUSKAWILLA RETAIL PARTNERS II LLC 6 VAN ST O P ST O P LA N E 2 LA N E 1 DO NO T E N T E R 2 5 ' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 5' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 5' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 1 5 ' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K FFE = 3 4 . 7 0 FFE = 3 4 . 7 0 ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO 7-BREW DEVELOPMENT. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL NECESSARY CONSTRUCTION ITEMS AS NEEDED. ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO 7-BREW DEVELOPMENT. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL NECESSARY CONSTRUCTION ITEMS AS NEEDED. ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO 7-BREW DEVELOPMENT. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL NECESSARY CONSTRUCTION ITEMS AS NEEDED. STOP 1 4 ' 9' 1 8 ' 21' TYP 9' TY P 16 ' 13.50' 2 6 ' 14.1 6 ' 25' 59.5 9 ' 63.1 5 ' 5 2 . 4 2 ' 5 2 . 4 2 ' 4 3 . 3 3 ' 4 3 . 3 3 ' 2 ' 1 2 . 5 ' 1 7 . 1 4 ' 1 2 . 5 ' 2 ' 1 2 . 5 ' 1 8 ' T Y P 5 . 7 8 ' 5 ' 9' 36.7 4 ' 23.1 3 ' 12.5 ' 2' 12.5 ' 20.2 4 ' 2.59 ' 36.8 7 ' 25' 8 . 7 6 ' 5 . 5 7 ' 1 0 . 5 ' 1 6 . 8 6 ' TYP TYP TYP TYP TYP TYP TYP 72A 72A 72A 72A 72A 09A 09U 09D 09S 08B 72B 02E 03A 11A 70D TRUCK DELIVERY AREA. R15' R15' R15' R15' R15' R31' R29' R27.5' R29.5' R42' R42' R43' 12F 12G 10B EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT INSTALLED BY OVERALL DEVELOPER FIRE HYDRANT APPROX. 115 LF FROM 7BREW BUILDING 03N 72C R42' R10' R10' R10' 20' 2 0 ' R10' R20' CEI PROJECT NUMBER DATE PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD PROJECT MANAGER DESIGNER REVISION SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE CEI ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. REVISION NO.DESCRIPTION DATE C2.0 SITE PLAN REV-1 10/17/2025 34335 BWB EVD TAB DR A W I N G L O C A T I O N - P: \ 3 4 0 0 0 \ 3 4 3 3 5 . 0 \ D R A W I N G S \ D E S I G N \ W O R K I N G \ 3 4 3 3 5 - S P . D W G - - S A V E D B Y - GB I N A M © 2025 CEI ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. FAX: (479) 273-0844 PHONE: (479) 273-9472 BENTONVILLE, AR 72712 2600 NE 11TH ST, SUITE 300 WI N T E R S P R I N G S , FL O R I D A MI C H A E L B L A K E B L V D SE V E N B R E W PARKING TABLE SPACES REQUIRED SPACES PROVIDED STANDARD CAR PARKING NO PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENTS 6 SPACES ACCESSIBLE PARKING 1 SPACE 1 SPACE TOTAL CAR PARKING NO PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENTS 7 SPACES ACREAGE SUMMARY TABLE PARCEL ± 21,744 SF (0.50 AC) PERVIOUS AREA ± 6,923 SF (0.16AC) IMPERVIOUS AREA ± 14,821 SF (0.34 AC) SITE INFORMATION ZONING T-5: URBAN CENTER ZONE BUILDING FOOTPRINT 510 SF BUILDING HEIGHT 19' SETBACKS NORTH 25' BUILDING SOUTH 15' BUILDING EAST 5' BUILDING WEST 5' BUILDING PROPOSED LEGEND GENERAL SITE NOTES A.ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. B.ALL CURB RETURN RADII SHALL BE 3', AS SHOWN TYPICAL ON THIS PLAN, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. C.UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN, CALLED OUT OR SPECIFIED HEREON OR WITHIN THE SPECIFICATIONS: ALL CURB AND GUTTER ADJACENT TO ASPHALT PAVING SHALL BE INSTALLED PER DETAIL 01A. ALL CURBING ADJACENT TO CONCRETE PAVING SHALL BE INSTALLED PER DETAIL 01B. D.ALL PARKING LOT SIGN BASE SUPPORTS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER DETAIL 12F. E.ALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS SHALL HAVE SIGNAGE INSTALLED PER DETAIL 09S. F.PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION IN RIGHT-OF-WAY, CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL TRAFFIC CONTROL IN ACCORDANCE WITH MUTCD. PROPERTY LINE/RIGHT OF WAY LINE CURB INLET BUILDING CONTROL POINT PROPOSED PARKING SPACES LIMITS OF SIDEWALKS AND CONCRETE APRONS (PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. SEE DETAIL PAVING PLAN # ADJACENT ZONING INFORMATION NORTH T-5: URBAN CENTER ZONE SOUTH T-5: URBAN CENTER ZONE EAST T-5: URBAN CENTER ZONE WEST T-5: URBAN CENTER ZONE LEGEND VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE SITE MICH A E L B L A K E B O U L E V A R D T R E E S W A L L O W D R . E A S T F L O R I D A 4 3 4 EXISTING LEGEND -**- = SOUTHEASTERN SURVEYING & MAPPING CORPORATION D S = SET 5/8" IRON ROD SSMC LB 2108 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED = CONCRETE MONUMENT = DRAINAGE MANHOLE = HAND HOLE = NAIL W/DISC = POST/BOLLARD = SEWER VALVE = TRAFFIC SIGN ABBREVIATION LEGEND: = DEED/DESCRIPTION DATA(D) L R Δ CH CB PRM ALTA NSPS ORB PG(S) LB PSM ID TRAV.PT. SSMC = TRAVERSE POINT = IDENTIFICATION = PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER = LICENSED BUSINESS = PAGE(S) = OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK = NATIONAL SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEY = AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION = PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT = CHORD BEARING = CHORD = DELTA = RADIUS = LENGTH SYMBOL LEGEND: HATCHING LEGEND: = CURB & GUTTER = CONCRETE LINETYPE LEGEND: = WIRE FENCE SITE BENCHMARK BEARINGS SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHTO OF WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD 434 AS SHOWN ON THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPROTATION RIGHT OF WAY MAP SECTION 77070-2516, BEING NORTH 39°43'43" WEST. SITE BENCHMARK 1 SET NAIL & DISK "SSMC TRAV. PT." ELEVATION=36.87 SITE BENCHMARK 2 SET NAIL & DISK "SSMC TRAV. PT." ELEVATION=34.98 NOTE: SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF PORCHES, RAMPS, VESTIBULE, SLOPED PAVING, TRUCK DOCKS, BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS AND PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS.Know what's below. before you dig.Call 0 20'30'40' SCALE IN FEET SITE DETAILS 01A TYPE A CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 02A PRECAST CONCRETE WHEEL STOP 03A WHEELCHAIR RAMP IN SIDEWALK 03N WHEELCHAIR RAMP IN SIDEWALK (TYPICAL AT EACH DRIVEWAY CURB RETURN) 09A SIXTY DEGREE PARKING SPACE STRIPING 09D 60 DEGREE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE STRIPING 09S ACCESSIBLE / VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN 09U ACCESSIBLE PARKING SYMBOL 10A TRAFFIC FLOW ARROW 10B STOP BAR 11A DO NOT ENTER SIGN 12F SIGN BASE 12G STOP SIGN 70D BIKE RACK 72A FDOT DETAIL "CURB AND GUTTER" "TYPE F" 72B FDOT DETAIL 711-001. "PAVEMENT MARKINGS" "THROUGH LANE USE ARROW" 72C FDOT DETAIL 711-001. "SPECIAL EMPHASIS CROSSWALK DETAIL" SITE NOTES 02E TRASH DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE (PER ARCH. PLANS). 08B OVERHEAD CANOPY - (TYP.-PER ARCH. PLANS). GRATE INLET A.FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS ROADS PROVIDED AT THE START OF A PROJECT AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. (NFPA 1, 16.14). B.A SECOND ENTRANCE/EXIT MIGHT BE REQUIRED PER AHJ IF THE RESPONSE TIME FOR EMERGENCY IS EXCEEDED PER NFPA 1, SECTION 18.2.3.3 MULTIPLE ACCESS ROADS. C.WATER SUPPLY FOR FIRE PROTECTION, EITHER TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT, SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE AS SOON AS COMBUSTIBLE MATERIAL ACCUMULATES. THIS APPLIES TO BOTH COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS. (NFPA 1, 16.5.3.1). D.WHERE UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS AND HYDRANTS ARE TO BE PROVIDED, THEY SHALL BE INSTALLED, COMPLETED, AND IN SERVICE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION WORK. (NFPA 1, 16.4.3.1.3). E.FIRE FLOW TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 291, RECOMMENDED PRACTICE FOR FIRE FLOW TESTING. F.A 36 IN. CLEAR SPACE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AROUND THE CIRCUMFERENCE OF FIRE HYDRANTS AND A CLEAR SPACE OF NOT LESS THAN 60 IN. (1524 MM) SHALL BE PROVIDED IN FRONT OF EACH HYDRANT CONNECTION HAVING A DIAMETER GREATER THAN 21⁄2 IN. NFPA 1, 18.5.7. G.HYDRANT SHALL BE MARKED WITH A BLUE REFLECTOR THAT IS PLACED 6'' IN THE ROADWAY IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 1, CHAPTER 18.5.10. H.ACCESS TO GATED SUBDIVISIONS OR DEVELOPMENTS SHALL PROVIDE FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS THROUGH AN APPROVED SOS AND SEMINOLE COUNTY KNOX KEY SWITCH. NFPA 1, 18.2.2.2. NOTE: IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 18.4 AND TABLE 18.4.5.2.1 OF THE NFPA 1 FOR A TYPE II BUILDING OF 150 SQUARE FEET IS A REQUIRED FLOW OF 1,500 GPM FOR A DURATION OF 2 HOURS. NOTE: 958 GPD WATER DEMAND, 400 GDP SANITARY AND 20 GPM PEAK. 53 15' UTILITY EASEMENT O.R.B. 7486, PG. 155 S V S T E S T S T O R M M A N H O L E N R E : 3 5 . 9 7 ' S W I N V : 3 0 . 4 7 ' ( 1 8 " R C P ) S E I N V : 3 0 . 3 0 ' ( 1 8 " R C P ) N W I N V : 3 0 . 3 4 ' ( 1 8 " R C P ) S T A T E R O A D N O . 4 3 4 - O V I E D O R O A D ( R / W V A R I E S ) 1 5 ' U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T ( O . R . B . 7 4 8 6 , P G . 1 5 5 ) FLO R I D A T R A I L ( 5 0 ' R / W ) S S S S S S S S S S S S S SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS D W W W W W W W W S E A H A W K C O V E - 6 2 ' R O W W W W W W W W W S S * * SITE BENCHMARK SET NAIL & DISK "SSMC TRAV. PT." ELEVATION=34.98 SITE BENCHMARK SET NAIL & DISK "SSMC TRAV. PT." ELEVATION=36.87 N O R T H E A S T E R L Y R I G H T O F W A Y L I N E U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T O R B 7 4 8 6 , P A G E 1 5 5 N25°10'29"W 48.66' 104 LF 12" HDPE @1.00% 47 LF 12" HDPE @1.00% 2 5 ' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 5' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 5' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 1 5 ' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K FFE = 3 4 . 7 0 FFE = 3 4 . 7 0 ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO 7-BREW DEVELOPMENT. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL NECESSARY CONSTRUCTION ITEMS AS NEEDED. ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO 7-BREW DEVELOPMENT. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL NECESSARY CONSTRUCTION ITEMS AS NEEDED. ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO 7-BREW DEVELOPMENT. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL NECESSARY CONSTRUCTION ITEMS AS NEEDED. 18D 21A 21A GRATE INLET-3 RIM: 32.89' INV IN S: 27.00' INV IN E: 27.00' INV OUT: 26.90' CURB INLET-1 RIM: 34.31' INV OUT: 28.04' CURB INLET-2 RIM: 33.58' INV OUT: 27.47' 73A 28A 28A 73A 23A 34 34 TC 34.17 G 33.67 TC 33.93 G 33.43 TC 33.72 G 33.22 TC 33.58 G 33.08 TC 33.58 G 33.08 TC 33.64 G 33.14TC 33.72 G 33.22TC 33.97 G 33.47 TC 34.51 G 34.01 TC 34.69 G 34.19 TC 34.42 G 33.92 TC 34.32 G 33.82 TC 34.70 G 34.20 TC 34.92 G 34.42 TC 35.02 G 34.52 TC 35.14 G 34.64 TC 34.53 G 34.03 TC 34.45 G 33.95 TC 34.31 G 33.81 TC 34.31 G 33.81 TC 34.56 G 34.06 TC 34.52 G 34.02 TC 34.24 G 33.74 TC 34.16 G 33.66 TC 33.92 G 33.42 TC 33.53 G 33.03 G 34.00 FFE=34.70FFE=34.70 TC 34.50 G 34.15 G 34.70 G 34.65 FG 34.07 FG 34.07 G 34.09 G 34.18 G 34.18 TC 34.68 TC 34.68 TC 33.87 TC 34.65 TC 34.70 TC 34.58 TC 34.65 TC 33.61 FG 34.62 FG 34.70 FG 34.60 FG 34.49 FG 34.39 TC 34.36 FG 34.58 TC 34.65 G 34.15 TC 34.64 G 34.14 TC 34.60 G 34.10 TC 34.65 G 34.15 TC 34.34 G 33.84 3 . 2 % 2 . 0 % 1.5% 1. 2 % 1 . 9 % 4.7 % 2.4% 1.4% 1 . 9 % 1. 3 % 6. 3 % 1 7 . 6 % 0.8 % 0.6% 1.6 % 0.9 % 1.2% 0 . 5 % 2.2 % 3.0% 3.8% 0.6% 1.0 % 0.5 % 0.5% 1.7% 8.4% 3 . 5 % FG 34.70 21B 21B 0.6 % 0. 7 % TC 34.45 G 33.95 TC 34.45 G 33.95 TC 34.21 G 33.71 TC 34.10 G 33.60 73B73C FG 34.17 FG 34.07 FG 34.24 FG 34.09 TC 34.25 G 33.75 18D 73B 73C FG 34.16 FG 34.19 TC 34.28 G 33.78 TC 34.55 G 34.05 1.4% TC 34.32 G 33.82 1. 2 % TC 34.61 G 34.11 TC 34.36 G 33.86 TC 34.39 G 33.89 TC 34.58 G 34.08 FG 34.11 FG 33.92 FG 34.25 FG 34.08 1 . 5 % 34 3 5 34 34 34 3 4 34 34 34 3 5 CEI PROJECT NUMBER DATE PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD PROJECT MANAGER DESIGNER REVISION SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE CEI ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. REVISION NO.DESCRIPTION DATE C3.0 GRADING PLAN REV-1 10/3/2025 34335 BWB EVD TAB DR A W I N G L O C A T I O N - P: \ 3 4 0 0 0 \ 3 4 3 3 5 . 0 \ D R A W I N G S \ D E S I G N \ W O R K I N G \ 3 4 3 3 5 - G P . D W G - - S A V E D B Y - AM C D A N I E L © 2025 CEI ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. FAX: (479) 273-0844 PHONE: (479) 273-9472 BENTONVILLE, AR 72712 2600 NE 11TH ST, SUITE 300 WI N T E R S P R I N G S , FL O R I D A MI C H A E L B L A K E B L V D SE V E N B R E W PROPOSED LEGEND GENERAL GRADING NOTES A.PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF STORM OR SANITARY SEWER, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE, VERIFY, AND CALCULATE ALL CROSSINGS AND INFORM THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER OF ANY CONFLICTS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER WILL BE HELD HARMLESS IN THE EVENT THE ENGINEER IS NOT NOTIFIED OF DESIGN CONFLICTS. B.CONTRACTOR HAS THE OPTION TO BID THE FOLLOWING MATERIAL FOR THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM: RCP, CPP, PP OR HDPE AS INDICATED ON THIS PLAN WHERE THE WORD PIPE IS USED. ALL PIPE LOCATED WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY SHALL BE RCP. ALL PIPES SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM ROUGHNESS COEFFICIENT ("N") OF 0.013 AND SHALL MEET OR EXCEED THE PIPE MANUFACTURERS REQUIREMENTS FOR MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM COVER. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE SITEWORK SPECIFICATION SECTION FOR STORM SEWER SYSTEMS FOR ACCEPTABLE TYPE AND MATERIAL. C.ALL SLOPES AND AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE GRADED SMOOTH AND 4" OF TOPSOIL APPLIED. IF ADEQUATE TOPSOIL IS NOT AVAILABLE ON SITE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TOPSOIL, APPROVED BY THE OWNER, AS NEEDED. THE AREA SHALL THEN BE SEEDED, FERTILIZED, MULCHED, WATERED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL HARDY GRASS GROWTH IS ESTABLISHED IN ALL AREAS (SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR SEED MIX AND PROPER APPLICATION RATE). ANY AREAS DISTURBED FOR ANY REASON PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE CORRECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. D.THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. E.UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN, CALLED OUT OR SPECIFIED HEREON OR WITHIN THE SPECIFICATIONS: ALL STORM DRAIN PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE INSTALLED PER DETAIL 28A. ALL STORM DRAIN PIPES ARE MEASURED FROM CENTER OF STRUCTURES AND ENDS OF FLARED END SECTIONS. F.PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION IN RIGHT-OF-WAY, CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL TRAFFIC CONTROL IN ACCORDANCE WITH MUTCD. PROPERTY LINE/RIGHT OF WAY LINE GRADE BREAK (RIDGE) CONTOUR ELEVATIONS STORM DRAIN XX.XXx SPOT ELEVATIONS: XXX GRADE BREAK (FLOWLINE) TC = TOP OF CURB G = GUTTER FG = FINISHED GRADE (NATURAL GROUND) FS = FINISHED SURFACE (PAVEMENT) FFE = FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION FL = FLOW LINE CURB INLET SITE BENCHMARK BEARINGS SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHTO OF WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD 434 AS SHOWN ON THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPROTATION RIGHT OF WAY MAP SECTION 77070-2516, BEING NORTH 39°43'43" WEST. SITE BENCHMARK 1 SET NAIL & DISK "SSMC TRAV. PT." ELEVATION=36.87 SITE BENCHMARK 2 SET NAIL & DISK "SSMC TRAV. PT." ELEVATION=34.98 NOTE: SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF PORCHES, RAMPS, VESTIBULE, SLOPED PAVING, TRUCK DOCKS, BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS AND PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS.Know what's below. before you dig.Call 0 20'30'40' SCALE IN FEET LEGEND VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE SITE MICH A E L B L A K E B O U L E V A R D T R E E S W A L L O W D R . E A S T F L O R I D A 4 3 4 EXISTING LEGEND -**- = SOUTHEASTERN SURVEYING & MAPPING CORPORATION D S = SET 5/8" IRON ROD SSMC LB 2108 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED = CONCRETE MONUMENT = DRAINAGE MANHOLE = HAND HOLE = NAIL W/DISC = POST/BOLLARD = SEWER VALVE = TRAFFIC SIGN ABBREVIATION LEGEND: = DEED/DESCRIPTION DATA(D) L R Δ CH CB PRM ALTA NSPS ORB PG(S) LB PSM ID TRAV.PT. SSMC = TRAVERSE POINT = IDENTIFICATION = PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER = LICENSED BUSINESS = PAGE(S) = OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK = NATIONAL SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEY = AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION = PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT = CHORD BEARING = CHORD = DELTA = RADIUS = LENGTH SYMBOL LEGEND: HATCHING LEGEND: = CURB & GUTTER = CONCRETE LINETYPE LEGEND: = WIRE FENCE GRATE INLET GRADING DETAILS 21A CURB INLET 23A GRATE INLET 73A FDOT DETAIL 425-020 '"CURB INLET TYPES 1,2,3, AND 4" 73B FDOT DETAIL 425-010 "STRUCTURE BOTTOMS" 73C FDOT DETAIL 425-001 "SUPPLEMENTARY DETAILS FOR DRAINAGE STRUCTURES" GRADING NOTES 18D MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS. 21A TAPER CURB TO MATCH EXISTING CURB. 21B TAPER CURB FROM 6 INCHES TO 0 INCHES. 54 LOT 8 3 5 7 . 6 5 ' 4 8 . 6 6 ' 2 4 6 . 6 0 ' N 3 8 ° 4 3 ' 1 6 " W P O B S50 ° 3 1 ' 5 8 " W NOR T H W E S T E R L Y BOU N D A R Y L I N E S O U T H E A S T E R L Y R / W L I N E M I C H A E L B L A K E B L V D . 15' UTILITY EASEMENT O.R.B. 7486, PG. 155 ADDRESS: MICHAEL BLAKE BOULEVARD P.I.N.: 26-20-30-5AR-0A00-007K N 2 4 ° 1 0 ' 0 6 " W N 3 8 ° 4 3 ' 1 6 " W X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X S V S T E S T S T O R M M A N H O L E N R E : 3 5 . 9 7 ' S W I N V : 3 0 . 4 7 ' ( 1 8 " R C P ) S E I N V : 3 0 . 3 0 ' ( 1 8 " R C P ) N W I N V : 3 0 . 3 4 ' ( 1 8 " R C P ) N 51 ° 3 6 ' 2 6 " E 94.9 4 ' ( D ) P O I N T O F B E G I N N I N G N O R T H E A S T E R L Y R / W L I N E O F S T A T E R O A D N O . 4 3 4 L 1 N 3 9 ° 4 3 ' 3 9 " W 3 5 7 . 6 5 ' ( M ) N 3 8 ° 4 3 ' 1 6 " W 3 5 7 . 6 5 ' ( D ) S T A T E R O A D N O . 4 3 4 - O V I E D O R O A D ( R / W V A R I E S ) ( T Y P I C A L ) G U T T E R 2 ' C U R B & 1 5 ' U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T ( O . R . B . 7 4 8 6 , P G . 1 5 5 ) FLO R I D A T R A I L ( 5 0 ' R / W ) P A R C E L A ± 1 . 0 1 5 A C R E S ( M ) ( V A C A N T L A N D ) P A R C E L " A " P O I N T O F B E G I N N I N G P A R C E L " B " P A R E N T P A R C E L S 51 ° 3 7 ' 4 8 " W 2 3 2 . 1 2 ' ( C ) N 3 8 ° 2 8 ' 3 3 " W 1 8 8 . 7 1 ' ( C ) S 3 9 ° 3 6 ' 2 5 " E 1 6 4 . 3 7 ' ( M ) S 3 8 ° 4 3 ' 1 6 " E 1 6 4 . 5 1 ' ( C ) S S S S S S S S S S S S S SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS D W W W W W W W W S E A H A W K C O V E - 6 2 ' R O W W W W W W W W W S S * * 1 0.00 LIMIT.1 2 0.00LIMIT.1 30.00LIMIT.1 4 0.00 LIMIT.1 C 1008 34.89 PT OLD BARB WIRE FENCE POST 1009 35.00 PT OLD BARB WIRE FENCE POST 1010 34.64 PT OLD BARB WIRE FENCE POST 101134.40PT OLD BARB WIRE FENCE POST 1012 34.39 PT OLD BARB WIRE FENCE POST 101534.23PT OLD BARB WIRE FENCE POST 1016 33.56PT OLD BARB WIRE FENCE POST 102232.77PVC 2 STUB OUT OF GROUND 5' PAINTED GREEN 1024 31.94 FNW.1 1028 31.56 FNW.1 ENDS HERE 3 4 . 4 7 110934.11HR.1 3 4 . 2 8 1112 34.19 BC.1111333.66GU.1 3 3 . 8 3 111534.71TG MPH 34.98 1117 34.87 GU.1 1118 35.29 BC.1 3 5 . 3 0 112135.37HR.1 3 5 . 3 5 3 5 . 8 6 1124 35.84 HR.1 3 5 . 7 6 35.6 1127 35.68 BC.11128 35.23 GU.1 3 5 . 3 7 1130 35.05 GU.1 1131 35.71 BC.1 113235.81BC.1 PC 1133 35.97BC.1 1134 35.79 BC.1 PT PC 1135 35.86 BC.1 1136 35.92 BC.1 PT113735.20GU.2 D 1138 35.93 DM.ADJ 3 5 . 8 9 3 6 . 1 1 1141 35.93 GU.2 3 6 . 4 2 114336.38BC.1 EC.3 TRAFFIC 114536.45BC.1 EC.4 3 6 . 5 4 1147 36.71 HR.1 1148 36.59 HR.1 3 6 . 6 8 1154 36.54 GU.2 1155 36.98 BC.1 3 7 . 1 4 1158 37.16 HR.1 3 7 . 1 4 37 . 2 6 3 7 . 2 1 116237.12HR.1 3 7 . 2 8 3 7 . 2 7 116737.15 BC.1 116836.69GU.236.80 36 . 7 2 36.96 117336.93GU.2 1174 37.45 BC.1 37 . 4 3 7 . 5 6 3 7 . 5 2 3 7 . 6 5 3 7 . 6 0 1183 37.46 BC.1118437.00GU.237.07 3 5 . 8 2 60036.66 IR 1/2"" IR ILLEG 60137.58ND CPH LB-7143 SITE BENCHMARK SET NAIL & DISK "SSMC TRAV. PT." ELEVATION=34.98 SITE BENCHMARK SET NAIL & DISK "SSMC TRAV. PT." ELEVATION=36.87 N O R T H E A S T E R L Y R I G H T O F W A Y L I N E 30 35 31 32 33 34 32 33 34 3 5 3 6 3 7 3 7 35 32 33 34 36 U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T O R B 7 4 8 6 , P A G E 1 5 5 N25°10'29"W 48.66' SF SF SF SF SF SF SF S F S F S F S F S F SF SF SF SF SF SF SF S F S F S F 50 ' 20' PfS 2 5 ' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 5' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 5' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 1 5 ' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K FFE = 3 4 . 7 0 FFE = 3 4 . 7 0 ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO 7-BREW DEVELOPMENT. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL NECESSARY CONSTRUCTION ITEMS AS NEEDED. ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO 7-BREW DEVELOPMENT. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL NECESSARY CONSTRUCTION ITEMS AS NEEDED. ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO 7-BREW DEVELOPMENT. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL NECESSARY CONSTRUCTION ITEMS AS NEEDED. 80F 80F 80F 85A 85C 76C 76C 76C 76C 34 34 3 . 2 % 2 . 0 % 1.5% 1. 2 % 1 . 9 % 4.7 % 2.4% 1.4% 1 . 9 % 1. 3 % 6. 3 % 1 7 . 6 % 0.8 % 0.6% 1.6 % 0.9 % 1.2% 0 . 5 % 2.2 % 3.0% 3.8% 0.6% 1.0 % 0.5 % 0.5% 1.7% 8.4% 3 . 5 % 0.6 % 0. 7 % 1.4% 1. 2 % 1 . 5 % 34 3 5 34 34 34 3 4 34 34 34 3 5 CEI PROJECT NUMBER DATE PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD PROJECT MANAGER DESIGNER REVISION SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE CEI ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. REVISION NO.DESCRIPTION DATE C4.0 EROSION CONTROL PLAN REV-1 10/3/2025 34335 BWB EVD TAB DR A W I N G L O C A T I O N - P: \ 3 4 0 0 0 \ 3 4 3 3 5 . 0 \ D R A W I N G S \ D E S I G N \ W O R K I N G \ 3 4 3 3 5 - G P . D W G - - S A V E D B Y - AM C D A N I E L © 2025 CEI ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. FAX: (479) 273-0844 PHONE: (479) 273-9472 BENTONVILLE, AR 72712 2600 NE 11TH ST, SUITE 300 WI N T E R S P R I N G S , FL O R I D A MI C H A E L B L A K E B L V D SE V E N B R E W A.ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN AND THE STATE OF FLORIDA NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM GENERAL PERMIT (NPDES PERMIT) AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THEIR CONTENTS. B.THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA SHALL ALSO BE USED AS THE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AREA, EQUIPMENT CLEANING AREA, EMPLOYEE BREAK AREA, AND AREA FOR LOCATING PORTABLE FACILITIES, OFFICE TRAILERS AND TOILET FACILITIES. THE EXACT LOCATIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE OWNER'S CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. C.ALL WASH WATER (CONCRETE TRUCKS, VEHICLE CLEANING, EQUIPMENT CLEANING, ETC.) SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN A MANNER THAT PREVENTS CONTACT BETWEEN THESE MATERIALS AND STORM WATER THAT IS DISCHARGED FROM THE SITE. D.MAINTAIN ON THE SITE OR HAVE READILY AVAILABLE SUFFICIENT OIL AND GREASE ABSORBING MATERIALS AND FLOTATION BOOMS TO CONTAIN AND CLEAN UP FUEL OR CHEMICAL SPILLS AND LEAKS. E.DUST ON THE SITE SHALL BE CONTROLLED BY SPRAYING WATER ON DRY AREAS OF THE SITE. THE USE OF MOTOR OILS AND OTHER PETROLEUM BASED OR TOXIC LIQUIDS FOR DUST SUPPRESSION OPERATIONS IS PROHIBITED. F.NO RUBBISH, TRASH, GARBAGE OR OTHER SUCH MATERIALS SHALL BE DISCHARGED INTO DRAINAGE DITCHES OR WATERS OF THE STATE. G.ALL STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION MEASURES PRESENTED ON THIS PLAN, AND IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN, SHALL BE INITIATED AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE. H.DISTURBED PORTIONS OF THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY WILL STOP FOR AT LEAST 21 DAYS, SHALL BE TEMPORARILY SEEDED WITHIN 14 DAYS. I.DISTURBED PORTIONS OF THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS PERMANENTLY STOPPED SHALL BE PERMANENTLY SEEDED. THESE AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED NO LATER THAN 14 DAYS AFTER THE LAST CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY OCCURRING IN THESE AREAS. REFER TO THE LANDSCAPING PLAN. J.IF THE ACTION OF VEHICLES TRAVELING OVER THE GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES IS NOT SUFFICIENT TO REMOVE THE MAJORITY OF DIRT OR MUD, THEN THE TIRES MUST BE WASHED BEFORE THE VEHICLES ENTER A PUBLIC ROAD. IF WASHING IS USED, PROVISIONS MUST BE MADE TO INTERCEPT THE WASH WATER AND TRAP THE SEDIMENT BEFORE IT IS CARRIED OFF THE SITE. THE EXACT LOCATIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE OWNERS CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. K.ALL MATERIALS SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED OR TRACKED FROM VEHICLES ONTO ROADWAYS OR INTO STORM DRAINS MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. L.CONTRACTORS OR SUBCONTRACTORS WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING SEDIMENT IN THE DETENTION POND AFTER THE STABILIZATION OF THE SITE AND ALSO ANY SEDIMENT THAT MAY HAVE COLLECTED IN THE STORM SEWER DRAINAGE SYSTEMS. M.IF SOIL STOCKPILING IS EMPLOYED ON THE SITE, SILT FENCES SHALL BE USED TO HELP CONTAIN THE SEDIMENT. N.SLOPES SHALL BE LEFT IN A ROUGHENED CONDITION DURING THE GRADING PHASE TO REDUCE RUNOFF VELOCITIES AND EROSION. O.SEDIMENT BASINS ARE ATTRACTIVE TO CHILDREN AND CAN BE VERY DANGEROUS. IN ALL CASES, LOCAL ORDINANCES AND REGULATIONS REGARDING HEALTH AND SAFETY MUST BE ADHERED TO. P.ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE DISPOSED OF WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER FINAL STABILIZATION. FINAL STABILIZATION HAS OCCURRED WHEN ALL SOIL DISTURBING ACTIVITIES ARE COMPLETED AND A UNIFORM PERENNIAL VEGETATIVE COVER WITH A DENSITY OF 70% OF THE COVER FOR UNPAVED AREAS AND AREAS NOT COVERED BY PERMANENT STRUCTURES HAS BEEN EMPLOYED Q.DUE TO THE GRADE CHANGES DURING THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADJUSTING THE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES (SILT FENCES, STRAW BALES, ETC.) TO HELP PREVENT EROSION AND STORM WATER POLLUTION. R.ALL OFF-SITE CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE STABILIZED AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY, THIS INCLUDES BACKFILLING OF TRENCHES FOR STORM DRAINS & UTILITY CONSTRUCTION AND PLACEMENT OF GRAVEL OR BITUMINOUS PAVING FOR ROAD CONSTRUCTION. MAINTENANCE ALL MEASURES STATED ON THIS EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN, AND IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN, SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN FULLY FUNCTIONAL CONDITION UNTIL FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CHECKED BY A QUALIFIED PERSON AT LEAST ONCE EVERY SEVEN CALENDAR DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF THE END OF A RAINFALL EVENT, AND SHOULD BE CLEANED AND REPAIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: 1.ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE CHECKED REGULARLY TO SEE THAT A GOOD STAND IS MAINTAINED. AREAS SHOULD BE FERTILIZED AND RESEEDED AS NEEDED. 2.SILT FENCES SHALL BE REPAIRED TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITIONS IF DAMAGED. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SILT FENCES WHEN IT REACHES ONE-THIRD TO ONE-HALF THE HEIGHT OF THE SILT FENCE. 3.THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOW OF MUD ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING OF THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AS CONDITIONS DEMAND. 4.THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA SHALL BE KEPT IN GOOD CONDITION (SUITABLE FOR PARKING AND STORAGE). THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING OF THE TEMPORARY PARKING AS CONDITIONS DEMAND. 5.IF THE STONES IN THE GRAVEL INLET SEDIMENT FILTERS BECOME CLOGGED WITH SEDIMENT, THE STONES MUST BE PULLED AWAY, CLEANED AND REPLACED. SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION 1.INSTALL STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES. 2.PREPARE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA. 3.CONSTRUCT THE SILT FENCES ON THE SITE. 4.CLEAR AND GRUB THE SITE. 5.BEGIN GRADING THE SITE. 6.START CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDING PAD AND STRUCTURES. 7.TEMPORARILY SEED DENUDED AREAS. 8.INSTALL UTILITIES, UNDERDRAINS, STORM SEWERS, CURBS AND GUTTERS. 9.INSTALL INLET PROTECTION DEVICES. 10.PREPARE SITE FOR PAVING. 11.PAVE SITE. 12.COMPLETE GRADING AND INSTALL PERMANENT SEEDING AND PLANTING. 13.REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES (ONLY IF SITE IS STABILIZED). GENERAL EROSION NOTES PROPOSED LEGEND PfS SOIL TYPES POMELLO FINE SAND, 0 TO 5 PERCENT SLOPES AREA OF DISTURBANCE = 0.55 ACRES (24,136 S.F.) APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF SOIL TYPE SF XXX SWP-CI (BIG RED) INLET PROTECTION CONCRETE WASHOUT SILT FENCE STORM DRAIN FLOWLINE GRADE BREAK CONTOUR ELEVATIONS LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE PROPERTY LINE/RIGHT OF WAY LINE LEGEND VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE SITE MICH A E L B L A K E B O U L E V A R D T R E E S W A L L O W D R . E A S T F L O R I D A 4 3 4 EXISTING LEGEND -**- = SOUTHEASTERN SURVEYING & MAPPING CORPORATION D S = SET 5/8" IRON ROD SSMC LB 2108 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED = CONCRETE MONUMENT = DRAINAGE MANHOLE = HAND HOLE = NAIL W/DISC = POST/BOLLARD = SEWER VALVE = TRAFFIC SIGN ABBREVIATION LEGEND: = DEED/DESCRIPTION DATA(D) L R Δ CH CB PRM ALTA NSPS ORB PG(S) LB PSM ID TRAV.PT. SSMC = TRAVERSE POINT = IDENTIFICATION = PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER = LICENSED BUSINESS = PAGE(S) = OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK = NATIONAL SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEY = AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION = PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT = CHORD BEARING = CHORD = DELTA = RADIUS = LENGTH SYMBOL LEGEND: HATCHING LEGEND: = CURB & GUTTER = CONCRETE LINETYPE LEGEND: = WIRE FENCE SITE BENCHMARK BEARINGS SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHTO OF WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD 434 AS SHOWN ON THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPROTATION RIGHT OF WAY MAP SECTION 77070-2516, BEING NORTH 39°43'43" WEST. SITE BENCHMARK 1 SET NAIL & DISK "SSMC TRAV. PT." ELEVATION=36.87 SITE BENCHMARK 2 SET NAIL & DISK "SSMC TRAV. PT." ELEVATION=34.98 NOTE: SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF PORCHES, RAMPS, VESTIBULE, SLOPED PAVING, TRUCK DOCKS, BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS AND PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS.Know what's below. before you dig.Call 0 20'30'40' SCALE IN FEET EROSION DETAILS 74A BIG RED. 76C SILT FENCE. 80F TEMPORARY SILT FENCE INLET PROTECTION. 85A TEMPORARY STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 85C TEMPORARY CONCRETE WASH OUT. 55 3 5 3 6 3 7 3 7 3 5 3 5 PRE-A AREA: 0.50 AC. CN: 39 STUDY POINT A - SHEET FLOW > > > > > > PROPOSED LEGEND 0 20'30'40' SCALE IN FEET Know what's below. before you dig.Call CEI ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. CEI PROJECT NUMBER DATE PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD PROJECT MANAGER DESIGNER REVISION PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE 2600 NE 11TH ST, SUITE 300 BENTONVILLE, AR 72712 PHONE: (479) 273-9472 FAX: (479) 273-0844 C5.0 PRE MAP REV-1 10/3/2025 34335 BWB EVD TAB SE V E N B R E W MI C H A E L B L A K E B L V D WI N T E R S P R I N G S , FL O R I D A DR A W I N G L O C A T I O N - P: \ 3 4 0 0 0 \ 3 4 3 3 5 . 0 \ D R A I N A G E R E P O R T \ W O R K I N G \ 3 4 3 3 5 - D R . D W G - - S A V E D B Y - OT O R R E S © 2025 CEI ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. PRE-DEVELOPED DRAINAGE BASIN LIMITS >TIME OF CONCENTRATION PATH 56 SITE BENCHMARK SET NAIL & DISK "SSMC TRAV. PT." ELEVATION=36.87 FFE = 3 4 . 7 0 FFE = 3 4 . 7 0 ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO 7-BREW DEVELOPMENT. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL NECESSARY CONSTRUCTION ITEMS AS NEEDED. ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO 7-BREW DEVELOPMENT. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL NECESSARY CONSTRUCTION ITEMS AS NEEDED. ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO 7-BREW DEVELOPMENT. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL NECESSARY CONSTRUCTION ITEMS AS NEEDED. 34 34 3 . 2 % 2 . 0 % 1.5% 1. 2 % 1 . 9 % 4.7 % 2.4% 1.4% 1 . 9 % 1. 3 % 6. 3 % 1 7 . 6 % 0.8 % 0.6% 1.6 % 0. 9 % 1.2% 0 . 5 % 2.2 % 3.0% 3.8% 0.6% 1.0 % 0.5 % 0.5% 1.7% 8.4% 3 . 5 % 0.6 % 0. 7 % 1.4% 1. 2 % 1 . 5 % 34 3 5 34 34 34 3 4 34 34 34 3 5 STUDY POINT A - SHEET FLOW PRE-A AREA: 0.07 AC. CN: 39 POST-B AREA: 0.43 AC. CN: 86 > > > > > > >>> > > > > STUDY POINT B PROPOSED LEGEND 0 20'30'40' SCALE IN FEET Know what's below. before you dig.Call CEI ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. CEI PROJECT NUMBER DATE PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD PROJECT MANAGER DESIGNER REVISION PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE 2600 NE 11TH ST, SUITE 300 BENTONVILLE, AR 72712 PHONE: (479) 273-9472 FAX: (479) 273-0844 C5.1 POST MAP REV-1 10/3/2025 34335 BWB EVD TAB SE V E N B R E W MI C H A E L B L A K E B L V D WI N T E R S P R I N G S , FL O R I D A DR A W I N G L O C A T I O N - P: \ 3 4 0 0 0 \ 3 4 3 3 5 . 0 \ D R A I N A G E R E P O R T \ W O R K I N G \ 3 4 3 3 5 - D R . D W G - - S A V E D B Y - OT O R R E S © 2025 CEI ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. POST-DEVELOPED DRAINAGE BASIN LIMITS >TIME OF CONCENTRATION PATH GRADE BREAK CONTOUR ELEVATIONS STORM DRAIN FLOWLINE XXX NOTE: AN APPLICATION FOR A MINOR MODIFICATION PERMIT TO ERP APPLICATION 95027-2 (WINTER SPRINGS TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT) HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. THIS APPLICATION COVERS DETENTION AND WATER QUALITY FOR THE ENTIRE 38 AC. SITE. THE PROPOSED 7 BREW SITE IS ENTIRELY WITHIN THE PREVIOUSLY PERMITTED TOWN CENTER, WITH A MAX 80% IMPERVIOUS AREA AS DETAILED IN THE STORMWATER MASTER PLAN. AS SEEN IN THE TABLE ABOVE, THE SITE IS 68% IMPERVIOUS, MEETING REQUIREMENTS. NO ADDITIONAL DETENTION OR WATER QUALITY IS REQUIRED FOR THIS SITE. 57 SITE BENCHMARK SET NAIL & DISK "SSMC TRAV. PT." ELEVATION=36.87 3 5 3 6 3 7 3 7 FFE = 3 4 . 7 0 FFE = 3 4 . 7 0 ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO 7-BREW DEVELOPMENT. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL NECESSARY CONSTRUCTION ITEMS AS NEEDED. ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO 7-BREW DEVELOPMENT. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL NECESSARY CONSTRUCTION ITEMS AS NEEDED. ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO 7-BREW DEVELOPMENT. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL NECESSARY CONSTRUCTION ITEMS AS NEEDED. 34 34 3 . 2 % 2 . 0 % 1.5% 1. 2 % 1 . 9 % 4.7 % 2.4% 1.4% 1 . 9 % 1. 3 % 6. 3 % 1 7 . 6 % 0.8 % 0.6% 1.6 % 0. 9 % 1.2% 0 . 5 % 2.2 % 3.0% 3.8% 0.6% 1.0 % 0.5 % 0.5% 1.7% 8.4% 3 . 5 % 0.6 % 0. 7 % 1.4% 1. 2 % 1 . 5 % 34 3 5 34 34 34 3 4 34 34 34 3 5 CURB INLET-1 AREA: 0.07 AC. CN: 98 GRATE INLET-3 AREA: 0.07 AC. CN: 98 CURB INLET-2 AREA: 0.28 AC. CN: 79 PROPOSED LEGEND 0 20'30'40' SCALE IN FEET Know what's below. before you dig.Call CEI ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. CEI PROJECT NUMBER DATE PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD PROJECT MANAGER DESIGNER REVISION PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE 2600 NE 11TH ST, SUITE 300 BENTONVILLE, AR 72712 PHONE: (479) 273-9472 FAX: (479) 273-0844 C5.2 INLET MAP REV-1 10/3/2025 34335 BWB EVD TAB SE V E N B R E W MI C H A E L B L A K E B L V D WI N T E R S P R I N G S , FL O R I D A DR A W I N G L O C A T I O N - P: \ 3 4 0 0 0 \ 3 4 3 3 5 . 0 \ D R A I N A G E R E P O R T \ W O R K I N G \ 3 4 3 3 5 - D R . D W G - - S A V E D B Y - OT O R R E S © 2025 CEI ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. INLET DRAINAGE BASIN LIMITS GRADE BREAK CONTOUR ELEVATIONS STORM DRAIN FLOWLINE XXX 58 S S S S S S S S S S S S S SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS D W W W W W W W W S E A H A W K C O V E - 6 2 ' R O W W W W W W W W W S S 15' UTILITY EASEMENT O.R.B. 7486, PG. 155 S V S T E S T S T O R M M A N H O L E N R E : 3 5 . 9 7 ' S W I N V : 3 0 . 4 7 ' ( 1 8 " R C P ) S E I N V : 3 0 . 3 0 ' ( 1 8 " R C P ) N W I N V : 3 0 . 3 4 ' ( 1 8 " R C P ) S T A T E R O A D N O . 4 3 4 - O V I E D O R O A D ( R / W V A R I E S ) 1 5 ' U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T ( O . R . B . 7 4 8 6 , P G . 1 5 5 ) FLO R I D A T R A I L ( 5 0 ' R / W ) 6''SS UGE & T UGT 1''W 1 ' ' W 1 ' ' W 1 ' ' W 1''W 2 5 ' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 5' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 5' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 1 5 ' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K FFE = 3 4 . 7 0 FFE = 3 4 . 7 0 ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO 7-BREW DEVELOPMENT. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL NECESSARY CONSTRUCTION ITEMS AS NEEDED. ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO 7-BREW DEVELOPMENT. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL NECESSARY CONSTRUCTION ITEMS AS NEEDED. ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO 7-BREW DEVELOPMENT. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL NECESSARY CONSTRUCTION ITEMS AS NEEDED. E * * 35.6 36 . 7 2 37.4 SITE BENCHMARK SET NAIL & DISK "SSMC TRAV. PT." ELEVATION=34.98 SITE BENCHMARK SET NAIL & DISK "SSMC TRAV. PT." ELEVATION=36.87 N O R T H E A S T E R L Y R I G H T O F W A Y L I N E U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T O R B 7 4 8 6 , P A G E 1 5 5 N25°10'29"W 48.66' 31C 75D 75C 42A 42B 22A30D31A 71 LF75B 31A75A26A INV: 29.9438.29 LF 6" PVC @ 1.50% INV: 29.82 8.02 LF 6" PVC @ 1.50% 11.25° BEND 31A 22G 22G 30H FIRE HYDRANT INSTALLED BY OVERALL DEVELOPER. 6''SS 6''SS 6''SS 1''W 1''W 1''W 23A 23A 75E 22L INV: 30.70 INV: 30.52 12.13 LF 6" PVC @ 1.50% INV: 30.56 2.71 LF 6" PVC @ 1.50% INV: 30.58 1.05 LF 6" PVC @ 1.50% INV: 30.61 INV: 30.71 6.66 LF 6" PVC @ 1.50% 45° BEND 75H CEI PROJECT NUMBER DATE PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD PROJECT MANAGER DESIGNER REVISION SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE CEI ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. REVISION NO.DESCRIPTION DATE PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION C6.0 UTILITY PLAN REV-1 10/3/2025 34335 BWB EVD TAB DR A W I N G L O C A T I O N - P: \ 3 4 0 0 0 \ 3 4 3 3 5 . 0 \ D R A W I N G S \ D E S I G N \ W O R K I N G \ 3 4 3 3 5 - U P . D W G - - S A V E D B Y - AM C D A N I E L © 2025 CEI ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. FAX: (479) 273-0844 PHONE: (479) 273-9472 BENTONVILLE, AR 72712 2600 NE 11TH ST, SUITE 300 WI N T E R S P R I N G S , FL O R I D A MI C H A E L B L A K E B L V D SE V E N B R E W CURB INLET GENERAL UTILITY NOTES A.ALL WATER LINES SHALL BE "TYPE K" WITH 36" MIN. COVER. B.ALL SANITARY SEWER LINES SHALL BE SDR 35 WITH 36" MIN. COVER. C.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ANY DISRUPTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITY SERVICES WITH ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS. D.ALL ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE AND GAS EXTENSIONS INCLUDING SERVICE LINES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS. ALL UTILITY DISCONNECTIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE DESIGNATED UTILITY COMPANIES. E.CONSTRUCTION SHALL NOT START ON ANY PUBLIC UTILITY SYSTEM UNTIL WRITTEN APPROVAL HAS BEEN RECEIVED BY THE ENGINEER FROM THE APPROPRIATE GOVERNING AUTHORITY AND CONTRACTOR HAS BEEN NOTIFIED BY THE ENGINEER. F.PRIOR TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF OR CONNECTION TO ANY STORM DRAIN, SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN OR ANY OF THE DRY UTILITIES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE, VERIFY AND CALCULATE ALL POINTS OF CONNECTION AND ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS AND INFORM CEI ENGINEERING AND THE OWNER/DEVELOPER OF ANY CONFLICT OR REQUIRED DEVIATIONS FROM THE PLAN. NOTIFICATION SHALL BE MADE A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CEI ENGINEERING AND ITS CLIENTS SHALL BE HELD HARMLESS IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACTOR FAILS TO MAKE SUCH NOTIFICATION. G.UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN, CALLED OUT OR SPECIFIED HEREON OR WITHIN SPECIFICATIONS: ALL WATER LINE FITTINGS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH THRUST BLOCKING PER DETAIL 31C. ALL WATER LINE PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE INSTALLED PER DETAIL 42A. ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE INSTALLED PER DETAIL 42B. H.PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION IN RIGHT-OF-WAY, CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL TRAFFIC CONTROL IN ACCORDANCE WITH MUTCD. PROPOSED LEGEND X"SS UGE UGE&T UGT X"W PROPERTY LINE/RIGHT OF WAY LINE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SERVICE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC AND TELEPHONE SERVICE UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE SERVICE WATER SERVICE GREASE TRAP (PER SEVEN BREW STANDARDS) LEGEND VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE SITE MICH A E L B L A K E B O U L E V A R D T R E E S W A L L O W D R . E A S T F L O R I D A 4 3 4 INSET A 0 5 7.5 10 SCALE IN FEET INSET A EXISTING LEGEND -**- = SOUTHEASTERN SURVEYING & MAPPING CORPORATION D S = SET 5/8" IRON ROD SSMC LB 2108 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED = CONCRETE MONUMENT = DRAINAGE MANHOLE = HAND HOLE = NAIL W/DISC = POST/BOLLARD = SEWER VALVE = TRAFFIC SIGN ABBREVIATION LEGEND: = DEED/DESCRIPTION DATA(D) L R Δ CH CB PRM ALTA NSPS ORB PG(S) LB PSM ID TRAV.PT. SSMC = TRAVERSE POINT = IDENTIFICATION = PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER = LICENSED BUSINESS = PAGE(S) = OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK = NATIONAL SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEY = AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION = PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT = CHORD BEARING = CHORD = DELTA = RADIUS = LENGTH SYMBOL LEGEND: HATCHING LEGEND: = CURB & GUTTER = CONCRETE LINETYPE LEGEND: = WIRE FENCE SITE BENCHMARK BEARINGS SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHTO OF WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD 434 AS SHOWN ON THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPROTATION RIGHT OF WAY MAP SECTION 77070-2516, BEING NORTH 39°43'43" WEST. SITE BENCHMARK 1 SET NAIL & DISK "SSMC TRAV. PT." ELEVATION=36.87 SITE BENCHMARK 2 SET NAIL & DISK "SSMC TRAV. PT." ELEVATION=34.98 NOTE: SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF PORCHES, RAMPS, VESTIBULE, SLOPED PAVING, TRUCK DOCKS, BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS AND PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS.Know what's below. before you dig.Call 0 20'30'40' SCALE IN FEET UTILITY DETAILS 31C THRUST BLOCKING 42A WATER LINE TRENCHING AND BEDDING 42B SANITARY SEWER TRENCHING AND BEDDING 75H GREASE TRAP UTILITY NOTES 22A POINT OF CONNECTION - WATER SERVICE (PER LOCAL CODES). 22G 90 DEGREE M.J. BEND WITH THRUST BLOCKING (SEE SIZES THIS SHEET). 22L METERED DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ENTRY PER ARCH. PLANS (SEE SIZES THIS SHEET). 23A POINT OF CONNECTION - SANITARY SEWER SERVICE (PER LOCAL CODES). 26A POINT OF CONNECTION FOR UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE (PER TELEPHONE COMPANY REQUIREMENTS). 30D VERIFY LOCATION AND DEPTH OF EXISTING UTILITY BEFORE CONSTRUCTING PROPOSED UTILITY. 30H JUNCTION BOX/PULL BOX FOR ELECTRICAL. TELEPHONE OR SIGNAL WIRES OF VARIOUS TYPES (PER LOCAL CODES). 31A LOCATION FOR THIS UTILITY AS SHOWN IS FOR DRAWING PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE EXACT LOCATION IN FIELD PRIOR TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED UTILITY LINE TO BE CONNECTED. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY CEI ENGINEERING IF THE DESIGN AS SHOWN IS NOT ACHIEVABLE. 75A CONNECT TO POLE MOUNTED TRANSFORMER 75B TWO 4" CONDUITS. 75C 1" DOMESTIC WATER METER. 75D 3 4" IRRIGATION WATER METER. 75E TWO WAY CLEANOUT. GRATE INLET NOTE: 958 GPD WATER DEMAND, 400 GDP SANITARY AND 20 GPM PEAK. 59 S S S S S S S S S S S S S SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS D W W W W W W W W S E A H A W K C O V E - 6 2 ' R O W W W W W W W W W S S * * 700 36.87 ND TPNDSSMC.ADJ 701 34.98 ND TPNDSSMC.ADJ 35.6 36 . 7 2 37 . 4 FLO R I D A T R A I L ACQ U I S I T I O N P A R C E L B ( R A I L S T O T R A I L S C O R R I D O R ) S T A T E R O A D 4 3 4 R I G H T O F W A Y V A R I E S F L O R I D A D E P A R T M E N T O F T R A N S P O R T A T I O N R I G H T O F W A Y M A P S E C T I O N 7 7 0 7 0 - 2 5 1 6 2" PVC STUB UP 5' FROM GROUND PAINTED GREEN FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD LB 8246 FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD ILLEGIBLE FOUND NAIL & DISC CPH LB 7143 HANDRAIL P O S T F O R O L D W I R E F E N C E ( T Y P I C A L ) VACANT NO IMPROVEMENT EXCEPT AS SHOWN SITE BENCHMARK SET NAIL & DISK "SSMC TRAV. PT." ELEVATION=34.98 SITE BENCHMARK SET NAIL & DISK "SSMC TRAV. PT." ELEVATION=36.87 C O N C R E T E W A L K E D G E O F P A V E M E N T N50 ° 3 7 ' 2 5 " E 1 7 0 . 6 7 ' N 3 9 ° 4 3 ' 4 3 " W 1 2 7 . 6 1 ' S50 ° 3 7 ' 2 8 " W 1 7 0 . 1 2 ' S 3 9 ° 2 8 ' 5 6 " E 1 2 7 . 6 1 ' N O R T H E A S T E R L Y R I G H T O F W A Y L I N E ( B E A R I N G B A S I S ) 2 " C U R B & G U T T E R N O R T H E A S T E R L Y R I G H T O F W A Y L I N E N O R T H E A S T E R L Y R I G H T O F W A Y L I N E U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T O R B 7 4 8 6 , P A G E 1 5 5 A PORTION OF PARCEL 1 LOT 8, BLOCK A D.R. MITCHELL'S SURVEY OF THE LEVY GRANT PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 5 PARCEL ID: 26-20-30-5AR-0A00-007L REMAINDER OF PARCEL 1 LOT 8, BLOCK A D.R. MITCHELL'S SURVEY OF THE LEVY GRANT PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 5 PARCEL ID: 26-20-30-5AR-0A00-007L TUSKAWILLA RETAIL PARTNERS II LLC REMAINDER OF PARCEL 1 LOT 8, BLOCK A D.R. MITCHELL'S SURVEY OF THE LEVY GRANT PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 5 PARCEL ID: 26-20-30-5AR-0A00-007L TUSKAWILLA RETAIL PARTNERS II LLC N24°10'06"W (D) N51 ° 3 6 ' 2 6 " E 94 . 9 4 ' ( D ) 3 6 . 9 1 ' NORT H W E S T E R L Y L I N E O F A C Q U I S I T I O N P A R C E L B N25°10'29"W 48.66' N 3 8 ° 4 3 ' 1 6 " W 3 5 7 . 6 5 ' ( D ) REMAINDER OF PARCEL 1 LOT 8, BLOCK A D.R. MITCHELL'S SURVEY OF THE LEVY GRANT PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 5 PARCEL ID: 26-20-30-5AR-0A00-007L TUSKAWILLA RETAIL PARTNERS II LLC TYP VAN ST O P ST O P LA N E 2 LA N E 1 DO NO T E N T E R 2 5 ' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 5' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 5' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 1 5 ' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K FFE = 3 4 . 7 0 FFE = 3 4 . 7 0 ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO 7-BREW DEVELOPMENT. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL NECESSARY CONSTRUCTION ITEMS AS NEEDED. ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO 7-BREW DEVELOPMENT. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL NECESSARY CONSTRUCTION ITEMS AS NEEDED. ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO 7-BREW DEVELOPMENT. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL NECESSARY CONSTRUCTION ITEMS AS NEEDED. STOP 810 SF1,924 SF 10,366 SF 434 SF 716 SF 466 SF 173 SF2 1 3 5 6 8 4 4 4 1 6 08C03D 08A 12D 12D 12D 08C 22 154 SF 03D 63 SF 212D 63 SF 212D CEI PROJECT NUMBER DATE PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD PROJECT MANAGER DESIGNER REVISION SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE CEI ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. REVISION NO.DESCRIPTION DATE C7.0 PAVING PLAN REV-1 10/17/2025 34335 BWB EVD TAB DR A W I N G L O C A T I O N - P: \ 3 4 0 0 0 \ 3 4 3 3 5 . 0 \ D R A W I N G S \ D E S I G N \ W O R K I N G \ 3 4 3 3 5 - S P . D W G - - S A V E D B Y - GB I N A M © 2025 CEI ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. FAX: (479) 273-0844 PHONE: (479) 273-9472 BENTONVILLE, AR 72712 2600 NE 11TH ST, SUITE 300 WI N T E R S P R I N G S , FL O R I D A MI C H A E L B L A K E B L V D SE V E N B R E W VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE GENERAL PAVING NOTES A.ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. B.PAVEMENT SECTION DESIGNS ARE TAKEN FROM THE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT AND ADDENDA AS PREPARED BY TTL INC., DATED DECEMBER 19, 2024. REFERENCE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR COMPLETE DESIGN SPECIFICATION AND DETAILED RECOMMENDATIONS. C.WITHIN 24 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY PAVING ACTIVITIES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM SUBGRADE COMPACTION AND PROOF ROLL TESTS ON PREPARED SUBGRADE TO VERIFY THE SUBGRADE HAS NOT DETERIORATED DURING PROJECT CONSTRUCTION, D.AFTER COMPLETING PAVING ACTIVITIES, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR HAVING PAVEMENT CORED UNDER SUPERVISION OF MATERIALS INSPECTOR AND SUBMITTING CORE RESULTS TO ENGINEER AND OWNER. E.CONCRETE TO ASPHALT STANDARD PAVEMENT HEADER SHALL BE USED FOR ALL CONCRETE TO ASPHALT INTERFACES. F.ALL AREAS WITH CONCRETE PAVING SHALL HAVE A "LIGHT BROOM" FINISH. G.UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN, CALLED OUT OR SPECIFIED HEREON OR WITHIN THE SPECIFICATIONS: ·ALL CURB AND GUTTER ADJACENT TO ASPHALT PAVING SHALL BE INSTALLED PER DETAIL 01A. ·ALL CURB AND GUTTER ADJACENT TO CONCRETE PAVING SHALL BE INSTALLED PER DETAIL 01B. H.PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION IN RIGHT-OF-WAY, CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL TRAFFIC CONTROL IN ACCORDANCE WITH MUTCD. LEGEND PROPOSED LEGEND PROPERTY LINE/RIGHT OF WAY LINE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. SEE DETAIL 01A/01B. PMS 000C C: 0%, M: 0%, Y: 0%, K: 0% R: 255, G: 255, B: 255 HEX: FFFFFF STRIPING PAINT COLORS PMS 293 C: 100%, M: 63%, Y: 0%, K: 35% R: 0, G: 61, B: 165 HEX: 003DA5 PMS 202 C: 29.54%, M: 95.11%, Y: 74.72%, K: 29.59% R: 138, G: 36, B: 50 HEX: 8A2432 PAVING DETAILS 08A STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVING. 03D CONCRETE SIDEWALK. 08C HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVING. PAVEMENT MARKING KEYNOTES 1.12" SOLID RED STOP BAR WITH 48-INCH TALL "STOP" TEXT PAINTED IN RED. 2. 4" SOLID BLUE PAVEMENT MARKER, TYPICAL. MIDLINES SPACE AT 24" O.C. 3.ALIGN 4" SOLID BLUE CROSS WALK MARKER WITH SLIDING DOOR PANEL AT FRONT OPENING. 4.SOLID WHITE TRIPLE ARROW PAVEMENT MARKER. 5.BLUE PAINTED ADA ACCESSIBLE PARKING SYMBOL. 6.48-INCH TALL "LANE #" PAINTED IN RED. 7.SOLID RED DIRECTIONAL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKING. 8.4" SOLID BLUE PAVEMENT MARKER, TYPICAL.. 7 BREW ARROW TEMPLATE 93°1' - 0 " 1' - 0 " 1' - 0 " 1' - 0 " 1' - 0 " 1' - 4 " 6' - 4 " 2'-10" 1'-5"1'-5" 2'-10" 1 3 3 ° WHITE BLUE RED SITE MICH A E L B L A K E B O U L E V A R D T R E E S W A L L O W D R . E A S T F L O R I D A 4 3 4 EXISTING LEGEND -**- = SOUTHEASTERN SURVEYING & MAPPING CORPORATION D S = SET 5/8" IRON ROD SSMC LB 2108 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED = CONCRETE MONUMENT = DRAINAGE MANHOLE = HAND HOLE = NAIL W/DISC = POST/BOLLARD = SEWER VALVE = TRAFFIC SIGN ABBREVIATION LEGEND: = DEED/DESCRIPTION DATA(D) L R Δ CH CB PRM ALTA NSPS ORB PG(S) LB PSM ID TRAV.PT. SSMC = TRAVERSE POINT = IDENTIFICATION = PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER = LICENSED BUSINESS = PAGE(S) = OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK = NATIONAL SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEY = AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION = PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT = CHORD BEARING = CHORD = DELTA = RADIUS = LENGTH SYMBOL LEGEND: HATCHING LEGEND: = CURB & GUTTER = CONCRETE LINETYPE LEGEND: = WIRE FENCE SITE BENCHMARK BEARINGS SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHTO OF WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD 434 AS SHOWN ON THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPROTATION RIGHT OF WAY MAP SECTION 77070-2516, BEING NORTH 39°43'43" WEST. SITE BENCHMARK 1 SET NAIL & DISK "SSMC TRAV. PT." ELEVATION=36.87 SITE BENCHMARK 2 SET NAIL & DISK "SSMC TRAV. PT." ELEVATION=34.98 NOTE: SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF PORCHES, RAMPS, VESTIBULE, SLOPED PAVING, TRUCK DOCKS, BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS AND PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS.Know what's below. before you dig.Call 0 20'30'40' SCALE IN FEET PAVING NOTES 12D 4 INCH WIDE PAINTED BLUE STRIPES. 2.0 FOOT O.C. @ 45 DEGREES (SEE SIZE INDICATED AT SYMBOL). 60 CEI PROJECT NUMBER DATE PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD PROJECT MANAGER DESIGNER REVISION SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE CEI ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. REVISION NO.DESCRIPTION DATE C8.0 DETAIL SHEET I REV-1 7/24/2025 34335 BWB EVD TAB DR A W I N G L O C A T I O N - P: \ 3 4 0 0 0 \ 3 4 3 3 5 . 0 \ D R A W I N G S \ D E S I G N \ W O R K I N G \ 3 4 3 3 5 - C S . D W G - - S A V E D B Y - AM C D A N I E L © 2025 CEI ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. FAX: (479) 273-0844 PHONE: (479) 273-9472 BENTONVILLE, AR 72712 2600 NE 11TH ST, SUITE 300 WI N T E R S P R I N G S , FL O R I D A MI C H A E L B L A K E B L V D SE V E N B R E W 01AN.T.S. NOTE: 1.GUTTER SLOPE TO MATCH ADJACENT PAVEMENT, TRAVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL. 2.SEE PAVING DETAILS FOR PAVEMENT SECTIONS, SUBBASE, SUBGRADE AND COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS. 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL BACKFILL BEHIND CURB PER PLANS, PRIOR TO PAVING. 12 " 12"6" 6" 6" 1" 11" MIN. 17" MAX. 18" MIN. 24" MAX. BA C K O F C U R B FA C E O F C U R B TYPE "A" CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 3,500 P.S.I. P.C. CONCRETE 1/2" MIN. R AGGREGATE BASE SUBGRADE STANDARD 60° PARKING SPACE (TY P . ) 60° STRIPE EDGE OF STRIPE EDGE OF D 36'36'36'36'38'38'38'38'40'40'40'40' 11.55' 11.55'11.55' 10.97'10.39' 11.55' 9.81' 11.55' 20'20'20'20' 11.55'10.97'10.39' 10.97'10.97'10.97' 10'9.5'9.0'8.5'10'9.5'9.0'8.5' 19'19'19' 11.55'10.97'10.39'9.81'11.55'10.97'10.39'9.81' 9.81' 10.97' 19' 11.55' 10.39' 10' 18' 11.55' 10.97' 10.39' 9.5' 18' 10.97' 10.39' 10.39' 9.0' 18' 10.39' 9.81' 10.39' 8.5' 18' 9.81' F E C B A NOTE: SEE SITE PLAN FOR TOTAL LAYOUT DIMENSION CHART F 90 ° 2'-0" O.C. (TYP.) LANE STRIPING 4" TRAFFIC BLUE C E B A D VARIES; SEE SITE PLAN 60° PARKING SPACE STRIPING N.T.S. 09A NOTE: ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO ℄ OF STRIPE UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED 4.62' 10.39' 36' 5' 5.77' 8' 18' 9.24' H G F E D C B A STRIPE EDGE OF EDGE OF STRIPE 7 . 0 ' 6.5' DIMENSION CHART H (SEE DETAIL 9A) 60° SPACES STANDARD STRIPING (TYP.) 4" TRAFFIC BLUE F (TYP.) E D C AG SIGN C L TYP. 6" 2.5'R 90 ° NOTE: SEE SITE PLAN FOR TOTAL LAYOUT (TYP.) STRIPING 2'-0" O.C. 4" TRAFFIC BLUE 60 ° B VARIES; SEE SITE PLAN 09D 60° ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE STRIPING N.T.S. NOTE: ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO ℄ OF STRIPE UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED 1'-6" 7' - 0 " ( M i n . ) 3' - 0 " ( M I N ) 2' - 0 " 3" ACCESSIBLE VAN 12" X 9" 12" X 6" PARKING RESERVED R7-8 VA R I E S 09S ACCESSIBLE / VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN N.T.S. THIS SIGN TYPICAL AT ALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES THIS SIGN TYPICAL AT ALL VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES PENALTY SIGN WITH WORDING AS REQUIRED BY STATE OR LOCAL LAW "U"-CHANNEL POST (2-lbs./ft.) 6" PIPE BOLLARD PAINTED TRAFFIC YELLOW, FILLED W/ CONCRETE. SLOPE TOP OF CONCRETE 3500 P.S.I. P.C. CONCRETE GROUND/PAVING SURFACE NOTES: 3.0' 1'R 4" 3. 4 ' LOCATE AT EDGE OF PARKING SPACE UNLESS ACCOMPANIED BY "VAN" LETTERING. WHERE INDICATED "VAN" LETTERING SHALL BE BLUE 12" HIGH LETTERING CENTERED ON THE STALL. ALL STRIPING SHALL BE BLUE. THE INSIDE AREA OF THE SYMBOL SHALL BE BLUE. N.T.S. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SYMBOL 09U 4.0' 4. 3 3 ' (TYPICAL) 6" + PIPE THICKNESS 6" + PIPE THICKNESS 6" + PIPE THICKNESS DIAGONAL @ COVER DIAGONAL @ COVER DIAGONAL @ COVER DIAGONAL @ COVER DIAGONAL @ COVER DIAGONAL @ COVER SPECIAL PATTERN #4's @ 6" E.W. #4's @ 6" E.W. #4'S @ 6" E.W. #4's @ 8" E.W. #4's @ 8" E.W. #4's @ 8" E.W. STEELDIMENSIONS W2 = 7' OR GREATER W1 = 7' OR GREATER W2 = 7' OR GREATER W1 = 7' OR LESS W2 = 7' OR LESS W1 = 7' OR LESS 8" 8" 8" 6" "D" 10" 8" 8" 8" "N" 6" + PIPE THICKNESS "T" BETWEEN 4' & 7' 4' GREATER THAN 7' BETWEEN 4' & 7' WIDTH ("W") "B" "A" SECTION BETWEEN 4' & 7' 4' #4's @ 10" #4's @ 10" #4's @ 10" #4's @ 10" #4's @ 10" VERT. #6's @ 6" #4's @ 6" #5's @ 4 1/2" #6's @ 9" #4's @ 9" HOR. GREATER THAN 7' BETWEEN 4' & 7' 4' WIDTH ("W") "B" "A" SECTION 15'-10" 14'-2" 12'-6" 11'-0" 9'-5" 9'-8" 8'-0" 7'-3" 6'-5" 5'-8" 4'-10" 45° 13'-2" 11'-10" 10'-6" 9'-2" 7'-10" 7'-10" 6'-7" 5'-11" 5'-3" 4'-7" 4'-0" 30° 11'-8" 10'-6" 9'-4" 8'-2" 7'-0" FOR "A" SECTION ONLY 7'-0" 5'-10" 5'-3" 4'-0" 4'-0" 4'-0" STRAIGHT SKEW OF CROSS DRAIN 48" 42" 36" 30" 24" DOUBLE 60" 48" 42" 36" 30" 24" SINGLE SIZE #6's @ 6" E.W. #4's @ 6" E.W. "B" "A" PIPE SECTION REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULE, BASE TABLE OF 'W' DIMENSIONS REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULE, TOP REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULE, WALLS TABLE OF "T" & "N" DIMENSIONS "W1" 10"3"6" 5"FOR"D"=8" 3"FOR"D"=6" DEPRESSION 3" GUTTER BOTTOM CURB DEPRESSED GUTTER NORMAL GUTTER TOP CURB/RIM 8 5 ° DOWNSTREAM 4" IN 5' UPSTREAM "N" "N" 2'-0" SIZE PIPE EXPANSION JOINT "J" BAR #4 REINF. BAR "J" BAR @ 14" CURB "A" #4 B A R RING & DEPRESSION "J " B A R @ 1 4 " NORMAL GUTTER NORMAL GUTTER TOP CURB/RIM DEPRESSED GUTTER BOTTOM CURB COMPACTED NEENAH R-1981-Y C.I. STEPS @ 16"O.C. PLAN ELEVATIONSECTION "A"-"A" 3500 PSI P.C. CONCRETE "T " "H " H E I G H T ( 3 5 ' - 0 " M A X . ) "W"(4'-0")MIN. "B " S E C T I O N (A F T E R 1 5 ' - 0 " T O 3 5 ' - 0 " ) "A " S E C T I O N ( M A X . 1 5 ' - 0 " ) 1'-0" 1'-0""N""W"(4'-0")MIN."N"1'-0" "B " S E C T I O N "A " S E C T I O N "H " H E I G H T 1'-6" COVER 4" IN 10' "A" GUTTER 1'-3" 10 " SUBGRADE '' D ' ' 21ACURB INLET N.T.S. GENERAL NOTES: 1.ALL EXPOSED CORNERS TO HAVE 3/4" CHAMFER 2.ALL #4 & #5 REINFORCING BARS TO HAVE 1-1/2" COVER, LARGER SIZES TO HAVE 2" COVER. 3.SEE GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN FOR PIPE SIZES, LOCATIONS, AND FLOW LINES. 4.PIPES SHALL CONNECT TO THE ENDS OR SIDES OF THE INLET. CONNECTION SHALL NOT BE MADE AT CORNERS OF INLET. 5.ALL REINFORCING BARS TO BE GRADE 60.NEENAH R-1737 (LIGHT DUTY) 6" + PIPE THICKNESS 6" + PIPE THICKNESS 6" + PIPE THICKNESS DIAGONAL @ COVER DIAGONAL @ COVER DIAGONAL @ COVER DIAGONAL @ COVER DIAGONAL @ COVER DIAGONAL @ COVER SPECIAL PATTERN #4's @ 6" E.W. #4's @ 6" E.W. #4'S @ 6" E.W. #4's @ 8" E.W. #4's @ 8" E.W. #4's @ 8" E.W. STEELDIMENSIONS W2 = 7' OR GREATER W1 = 7' OR GREATER W2 = 7' OR GREATER W1 = 7' OR LESS W2 = 7' OR LESS W1 = 7' OR LESS 8" 8" 8" 6" "D" 10" 8" 8" 8" "N" 6" + PIPE THICKNESS "T" BETWEEN 4' & 7' 4' GREATER THAN 7' BETWEEN 4' & 7' WIDTH ("W") "B" "A" SECTION BETWEEN 4' & 7' 4' #4's @ 10" #4's @ 10" #4's @ 10" #4's @ 10" #4's @ 10" VERT. #6's @ 6" #4's @ 6" #5's @ 4 1/2" #6's @ 9" #4's @ 9" HOR. GREATER THAN 7' BETWEEN 4' & 7' 4' WIDTH ("W") "B" "A" SECTION 15'-10" 14'-2" 12'-6" 11'-0" 9'-5" 9'-8" 8'-0" 7'-3" 6'-5" 5'-8" 4'-10" 45° 13'-2" 11'-10" 10'-6" 9'-2" 7'-10" 7'-10" 6'-7" 5'-11" 5'-3" 4'-7" 4'-0" 30° 11'-8" 10'-6" 9'-4" 8'-2" 7'-0" FOR "A" SECTION ONLY 7'-0" 5'-10" 5'-3" 4'-0" 4'-0" 4'-0" STRAIGHT SKEW OF CROSS DRAIN 48" 42" 36" 30" 24" DOUBLE 60" 48" 42" 36" 30" 24" SINGLE SIZE #6's @ 6" E.W. #4's @ 6" E.W. "B" "A" PIPE SECTION REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULE, BASE TABLE OF 'W' DIMENSIONS REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULE, TOP REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULE, WALLS TABLE OF "T" & "N" DIMENSIONS NEENAH R-1878 GRATE W/ A6G ANGLE FRAME (HEAVY DUTY) GRATE TYPE C SIZE PIPE "N" "N" 2'-0" 10 " 9 0 ° 10" CORNER BAR SUBGRADE COMPACTED NEENAH R-198I-Y C.I. STEPS @ 16"O.C. PLAN ELEVATION SECTION "A"-"A" 3500 PSI P.C. CONCRETE "T " "H " H E I G H T ( 3 5 ' - 0 " M A X . ) "W"(4'-0")MIN. "B " S E C T I O N (A F T E R 1 5 ' - 0 " T O 3 5 ' - 0 " ) "A " S E C T I O N ( M A X . 1 5 ' - 0 " ) 1'-0" 1'-0""N" "W"(4'-0")MIN. "N"1'-0" "B " S E C T I O N "A " S E C T I O N "A" "A" CORNER BARS - SAME SIZE AND SPACING AS HORIZONTAL BARS "H " H E I G H T '' D ' ' 23AGRATE INLET N.T.S. GENERAL NOTES: 1.ALL EXPOSED CORNERS TO HAVE 3/4" CHAMFER 2.ALL #4 & #5 REINFORCING BARS TO HAVE 1-1/2" COVER, LARGER SIZES TO HAVE 2" COVER. 3.SEE GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN FOR PIPE SIZES, LOCATIONS, AND FLOW LINES. 4.PIPES SHALL CONNECT TO THE ENDS OR SIDES OF THE INLET. CONNECTION SHALL NOT BE MADE AT CORNERS OF INLET. 5.ALL REINFORCING BARS TO BE GRADE 60. TOP OF STRUCTURE/RIM ELEVATION 3' 3' 45"x24" PAINTED WHITE PLYWOOD BLACK LETTERS 6" HEIGHT WOOD POSTS 4"x4"x8' (ABOVE GRADE) STAKE (TYP.) 10' MIN.* 10' MIN.* TEMPORARY CONCRETE WASHOUT N.T.S. 2 LAYERS 6 MIL PLASTIC LINING PLAN SECTION A-A WOOD FRAME SECURELY FASTENED AROUND ENTIRE PERIMETER WITH TWO OPPOSING STAKES A A N.T.S. TWO STACKED 2"x12" ROUGH WOOD FRAME NOTES: 1. *DENOTES THE INTERIOR DIMENSION. 2. CONCRETE WASHOUT SHALL BE AT LEAST 50 FT. FROM ANY STORM SEWER INLET. 3. THE CONCRETE WASHOUT SIGN SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN 30 FT. OF THE TEMPORARY CONCRETE WASHOUT FACILITY. N.T.S. CONCRETE WASHOUT CONCRETE WASHOUT SIGN DETAIL (OR EQUIVALENT) 85C 1 ° / 1 411 1.5 1 1 1 1 1 5 12 9 7 4 3 2 NOTE: 18" AND LARGER REQUIRES SPECIFIC DESIGN (ALL BENDS SIMILAR) 45° BENDS (SEE HORIZONTAL TABLE) DOWNWARD THRUST BLOCKING 7. ALL CONCRETE SHALL BE 2500 P.S.I. OF 2,500 lb./sq.ft. ADDITIONAL BACKING MAY BE REQUIRED IN SOME AREAS AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEERS. 6. REACTION BACKING TABLE IS BASED ON 100 P.S.I. AND SOIL BEARING PRESSURE 5. ALL BENDS WHERE FITTINGS ARE USED, BOTH HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL SHALL BE BACKED. 4. BACKING FUTURE LINE EXTENSIONS SHALL BE SUCH THAT LATER REMOVAL IS POSSIBLE. 3. BACK ALL TEES ACCORDING TO SIZE OF BRANCH. 2. WRAP ALL FITTINGS WITH VISQUEEN. 1. DO NOT COVER BELLS OR FLANGES WITH CONCRETE NOTES: ° 2 / 122 45°90°TEE 1 1 1 1 1 1.5 2 3 4 6 7 10 16 23 1 1 1 1 1.8 2.8 4 5.5 7 12 14 20 32 46 1 1 1 2 3.5 5.5 8 11 14.2 21 26 38 59 8585 59 38 26 21 10 8 6 4 2.5 1.5 1 1 1 36" 30" 24" 20" 18" 16" 14" 12" 10" 8" 6" 4" 3" 2" TYPE OF FITTINGS EARTHWALL FOR REACTION BACKING REQUIRED SQ. FT. OF UNDISTURBED SIZE HORIZONTAL THRUST BLOCKING TABLE CL A S S B C O N C R E T E CONCRETE CONCRETE CONCRETE CONCRETE UNDISTURBED EARTH WALL UNDISTURBED EARTH WALL TRENCH WALL TRENCH WALLTRENCH WALL TEE WITH PLUGCROSS WITH PLUG (ALL BENDS SIMILAR) 90° BENDTEECROSS CONCRETE UPWARD THRUST BLOCKING PIPE SIZE inches 2.0 3.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 #4Ø #4Ø #4Ø #4Ø #4Ø #4Ø #4Ø #4Ø #4Ø 2.63 2.01 1.48 1.03 0.66 0.37 0.16 0.09 0.04 11.25 DEGREE BEND ANCHOR STRAPS NO. SIZE Concrete VOLUME cu.yd.cu.yd. VOLUME Concrete NO. SIZE ANCHOR STRAPS 22.5 DEGREE BEND 0.08 0.18 0.33 0.74 1.31 2.04 2.94 4.01 5.23 #4Ø #4Ø #4Ø #4Ø #4Ø #4Ø #4Ø #4Ø #4Ø2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 cu.yd. VOLUME Concrete NO. SIZE ANCHOR STRAPS 45 DEGREE BEND 0.16 0.36 0.64 1.44 2.57 4.01 5.77 7.86 10.26 #4Ø #4Ø #4Ø #4Ø #4Ø #4Ø #4Ø #4Ø #5Ø2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 cu.yd. VOLUME Concrete NO. SIZE ANCHOR STRAPS 90 DEGREE BEND 0.30 0.67 1.19 2.67 4.74 7.40 10.65 14.52 18.95 #4Ø #4Ø #4Ø #4Ø #4Ø #4Ø #5Ø #6Ø #5Ø3 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 MINIMUM CONCRETE VOLUMES FOR UPWARD THRUST BLOCKING HORIZONTAL FITTINGS VERTICAL FITTINGS 31CTHRUST BLOCKING N.T.S. 08A N.T.S. STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVING 6" AGGREGATE BASE COMPACTED TO MIN. 98% OF MAX. DENSITY BASED ON MODIFIED PROCTOR 2" SURFACE COURSE MIN. 98% OF THEORETICAL MAX. DENSITY COMPACTED SUBGRADE MIN. 98% OF MAX. DENSITY BASED ON MODIFIED PROCTOR WITHIN +/-2% OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT NOTES: 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE ABOVE DETAILS WITH THE SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION PREPARED BY TTL, INC. REPORT DATED DECEMBER 19, 2024 PROJECT NUMBER 000240803190.00, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 08C N.T.S. 6" 4,000 P.S.I. P.C. CONCRETE HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVING 4" AGGREGATE BASE COMPACTED TO MIN. 98% OF MAX. DENSITY BASED ON MODIFIED PROCTOR NOTES: 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE ABOVE DETAILS WITH THE SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION PREPARED BY TTL, INC. REPORT DATED DECEMBER 19, 2024 PROJECT NUMBER 000240803190.00, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 6" COMPACTED SUBGRADE MIN. 98% OF MAX. DENSITY BASED ON MODIFIED PROCTOR WITHIN +/-2% OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT 24 " 24" STANDARD RED AND WHITE SIGN 11A "DO NOT ENTER" SIGN N.T.S. N.T.S.01B TYPE "B" CONCRETE INTEGRAL CURB AND GUTTER NOTE: 1.GUTTER SLOPE TO MATCH ADJACENT PAVEMENT, TRAVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL. 2.SEE PAVING DETAILS FOR PAVEMENT SECTIONS, SUBBASE, SUBGRADE AND COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS. 3.SEE PAVING DETAILS FOR CURB THICKNESS AND CONCRETE STRENGTH. 12" 6" 6" 1"BA C K O F C U R B FA C E O F C U R B 1/2" MIN. R AGGREGATE BASE SUBGRADE (TYP) CONCRETE SIDEWALK N.T.S.AND OR STRUCTURE. ABUTS EXISTING SIDEWALK, CURBS, AT AREAS WERE PROPOSED SIDEWALK INSTALL 1/2" EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL NOTES: REQUIRED REINFORCEMENT WILL BE No. 3 BARS 24" O.C. EACH WAY MAX. SPACING, OR 6 x 6 - W1.4 X W1.4 WWF 2. 1. A FILLER FULL DEPTH OF SIDEWALK JOINT (TYP) OR TOOLED SAW CUT 1/2" THICKNESS PREMOLDED EXPANSION JOINT FILLER SPACED @ 25' O.C. MAX. EXTEND JOINT PLAN VIEW SECTION A-A 4" AGGREGATE BASE COURSE COMPACTED TO 90% STD. PROCTOR (TYP) B B WHEN BORDERING PAVEMENT SECTION OF SIDEWALK 3500 PSI PC (TYP) TYP SECTION B-B 03D 4" 4" (TYP) 6" CONCRETE (TYP) 2" A SLOPE 2% MAX SEE SITE PLAN 2" 6" CONCRETE 3500 PSI PC 6" 1/2"R (TYP) SURFACE DRIVE (TYP) 1/2"RTOWARD DRIVE SLOPE 2% MAX NOTE: ALL SIDEWALKS WITHIN CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE NON-REINFORCED. EXTEND 6" FROM EACH SIDE OF WALK. (JOINT MAT'L. TO MEET ASTM D994 OR D1751) CJEJCJCJCJCJEJCJ CD E C: SEE SITE PLAN D: D=C E: E=Cx5 3' - 0 " 3" 2' - 0 " 7' - 0 " 1'-6" 7- 0 " ( S E C O N D A R Y S I G N A G E , I F N E E D E D ) ALL SIGNS SHOULD COMPLY WITH U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION'S "MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES", LOCAL CODES AND AS SPECIFIED. MOUNT SIGNS IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. 12FSIGN BASE N.T.S. MOUNT SIGN HERE "U"-CHANNEL POST (3 lbs./ft.) WHEN SIGN IS IN PAVED AREAS, USE 4" PIPE BOLLARD FILLED W/ CONCRETE AND PAINTED TRAFFIC YELLOW SLOPE TOP OF CONCRETE 3,500 PSI PC CONCRETE 30 " WHITE LEGEND RED BACKGROUND N.T.S. "STOP" SIGN R1-1 30" 12G 8' - 0 " LENGTH VARIES 5 1/"2 1'-8"1'-8"1'-8"1'-8" 2"/15 10" STOP BAR YELLOW REFLECTIVE TRAFFIC PAINT 1'-6" 8'-5" 4' - 0 " C D R I V E L ED G E O F D R I V E OR F A C E O F C U R B 10BSTOP BAR N.T.S. 61 CEI PROJECT NUMBER DATE PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD PROJECT MANAGER DESIGNER REVISION SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE CEI ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. REVISION NO.DESCRIPTION DATE C8.1 DETAIL SHEET II REV-1 7/24/2025 34335 BWB EVD TAB DR A W I N G L O C A T I O N - P: \ 3 4 0 0 0 \ 3 4 3 3 5 . 0 \ D R A W I N G S \ D E S I G N \ W O R K I N G \ 3 4 3 3 5 - C S . D W G - - S A V E D B Y - AM C D A N I E L © 2025 CEI ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. FAX: (479) 273-0844 PHONE: (479) 273-9472 BENTONVILLE, AR 72712 2600 NE 11TH ST, SUITE 300 WI N T E R S P R I N G S , FL O R I D A MI C H A E L B L A K E B L V D SE V E N B R E W 2. HAUNCHING SHALL BE WORKED AROUND THE PIPE BY HAND TO ELIMINATE VOIDS AND SHALL BE CLASS I-A OR CLASS I-B OR CLASS II COMPACTED TO 85% PROCTOR. SPECIFICATIONS) REGULATIONS AND LOCAL ORDINANCES. (SEE SUPPORTED IN COMPLIANCE WITH OSHA SHORED, SHEETED, BRACED, OR OTHERWISE 10. ALL TRENCH EXCAVATIONS SHALL BE SLOPED, LARGER THAN 3". FREE OF DEBRIS, ORGANICS AND ROCKS 9. FILL SALVAGED FROM EXCAVATION SHALL BE OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT. MATERIALS SHALL BE COMPACTED NEAR WITH ASTM D 698. CLASS III AND IV-A MAXIMUM 8" LOOSE LIFTS IN ACCORDANCE 8. ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN WITH ASTM D 2321, LATEST EDITION. 7. ALL MATERIALS ARE CLASSIFIED IN ACCORDANCE PROCTOR. BE CLASS IV-A COMPACTED TO 95% STANDARD 6. FINAL BACKFILL NOT UNDER PAVED AREAS CAN III COMPACTED AS NOTED IN NOTES 3. AND 4 5. FINAL BACKFILL SHALL BE CLASS I, II, OR STANDARD PROCTOR. CAN BE CLASS III COMPACTED TO 90% 4. INITIAL BACKFILL NOT UNDER PAVED AREAS COMPACTED TO 85% STANDARD PROCTOR. WORKED BY HAND, OR CLASS I-B OR CLASS II 3. INITIAL BACKFILL SHALL BE CLASS I-A SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADATION) COMPACTED TO 85% STANDARD PROCTOR. (SEE THEN BEDDING SHALL BE CLASS I-B HAND. IF GROUNDWATER IS ANTICIPATED, 1. BEDDING SHALL BE CLASS I-A WORKED BY GENERAL NOTES MI N . 6" WATER LINE & FORCE MAIN N.T.S. LINE BACKFILL 4" BEDDING (MIN.), HAUNCHING INITIAL 6" IN ROCK CUTS SPRING PIPE BACKFILL FINAL FINAL BACKFILL 12"MIN 18" MAX. 12"MIN. 18" MAX. UNDISTURBED FILL PIPE SPRING COMPACTED EARTH OR W O.D. INITIAL HAUNCHING BACKFILL LINE SANITARY SEWER N.T.S. 6"MI N . EARTH OR COMPACTED FILL UNDISTURBED 42A 42B 6" IN ROCK CUTS 4" BEDDING (MIN.), 12"MIN 18" MAX. 12"MIN. 18" MAX. W O.D. SANITARY SEWER AND WATER LINE TRENCHING AND BEDDING N.T.S. CROSSWALK STRIPING SLOPE ADJACENT TO TOP OF THE RAMP. CONFORM WITH LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK A MAXIMUM OF UP TO 8.33 % AT CURB TO 2. RAMP SIDE SLOPE VARIES UNIFORMLY FROM A MAXIMUM OF A 1/4" LIP. 1. THE BOTTOM OF THE RAMP SHALL HAVE NOTES: 4" MIN.2% MAX. ROUNDED TOP OF RAMP MIN. 5' CENTER OF CURB RETURN OF RAMP WHEN LOCATED IN THE USE BROOM FINISH ON SLOPING PORTION SECTION A-A PLAN A 1:12 MAX. AT CURB MAX. 8.33% SE E S I T E P L A N 2%MA X . SEE NOTE 1 (IF SHOWN ON PLANS) 8.33% MAX. N.T.S. A SLOPE BEGIN SIDEWALK PAVED AREA SLOPE TO FIT CONCRETE CURB CONCRETE CURB 3. CONSTRUCT PER A.D.A. STANDARDS. MAX. 2% 5' MIN. 2' MIN. STRAIGHT CURB TO EDGE OF CROSSWALK 12 ' C R O S S W A L K WHEELCHAIR RAMP IN SIDEWALK (TYPICAL AT EACH DRIVEWAY CURB RETURN) N.T.S. 03N PE R A . D . A . 2. HAUNCHING SHALL BE WORKED AROUND THE PIPE BY HAND TO ELIMINATE VOIDS AND SHALL BE CLASS I-A OR CLASS I-B OR CLASS II COMPACTED TO 85% PROCTOR. SPECIFICATIONS) REGULATIONS AND LOCAL ORDINANCES. (SEE SUPPORTED IN COMPLIANCE WITH OSHA SHORED, SHEETED, BRACED, OR OTHERWISE 10. ALL TRENCH EXCAVATIONS SHALL BE SLOPED, LARGER THAN 3". FREE OF DEBRIS, ORGANICS AND ROCKS 9. FILL SALVAGED FROM EXCAVATION SHALL BE OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT. MATERIALS SHALL BE COMPACTED NEAR WITH ASTM D 698. CLASS III AND IV-A MAXIMUM 8" LOOSE LIFTS IN ACCORDANCE 8. ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D 2321-89. 7. ALL MATERIALS ARE CLASSIFIED IN PROCTOR. BE CLASS IV-A COMPACTED TO 95% STANDARD 6. FINAL BACKFILL NOT UNDER PAVED AREAS CAN III COMPACTED AS NOTED IN NOTES 3. AND 4. 5. FINAL BACKFILL SHALL BE CLASS I, II, OR STANDARD PROCTOR. CAN BE CLASS III COMPACTED TO 90% 4. INITIAL BACKFILL NOT UNDER PAVED AREAS COMPACTED TO 85% STANDARD PROCTOR. WORKED BY HAND, OR CLASS I-B OR CLASS II 3. INITIAL BACKFILL SHALL BE CLASS I-A SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADATION) COMPACTED TO 85% STANDARD PROCTOR. (SEE THEN BEDDING SHALL BE CLASS I-B HAND. IF GROUNDWATER IS ANTICIPATED, 1. BEDDING SHALL BE CLASS I-A WORKED BY GENERAL NOTES FINAL BACKFILL 12" MIN 18" MAX. 12" MIN. 18" MAX. UNDISTURBED FILL PIPE SPRING COMPACTED EARTH OR W O.D. (MIN.) INITIAL HAUNCHING 4" BEDDING BACKFILL 4" LINE 6"MI N . EARTH OR UNDISTURBED COMPACTED FILL BACKFILL (MIN.) 4" 18" MAX.18" MAX. 4" BEDDING FINAL 12" MINO.D. W 12" MIN. STORM SEWER TRENCH AND BEDDING N.T.S. 28AFLEXIBLE PIPE N.T.S. 28ARIGID PIPE N.T.S. 20' M I N I M U M 50' M I N I M U M 6" MINIMUM HAR D S U R F A C E PUB L I C R O A D 2"-3" STONE GEOTEXTILE UNDERLINER TEMPORARY STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE N.T.S. 85A MATERIAL A MIN. EXTEND SILT FENCE WOVEN WIRE FENCE WITH SILT FENCE EXTEND WIRE FENCE MIN. OF 3" IN GROUND SECURELY FASTEN OVERLAPPING ENDS OF SILT FENCE MATERIAL TO ADJACENT STAKES WITH THREE WIRE TIES OR OTHER FASTENERS MATERIAL COVER 1'-0" INTO GROUND OVERLAP 5' MIN. SILT FENCE MATERIAL TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO WOVEN WIRE FENCE WITH THREE TIES SPACED AT 30" ON CENTER (SEE NOTE 1) 5' MIN. 3' MIN. 15" MIN. MAX. 18" 2" X 4" WOOD FRAME DROP INLET WITH GRATE AND CROSS BRACING ATTACH THE WOVEN WIRE FENCE TO EACH POST WITH THREE WIRE TIES OR OTHER FASTENERS (SEE NOTE 1) 1" x 2" STAKE 1. ATTACH THE WOVEN WIRE FENCE TO EACH POST AND THE GEOTEXTILE TO THE WOVEN WIRE FENCE (SPACED EVERY 30") WITH THREE WIRE TIES OR OTHER FASTENERS, ALL SPACED WITHIN THE TOP 8" OF THE FABRIC. ATTACH EACH TIE DIAGONALLY 45 DEGREES THROUGH THE FABRIC, WITH EACH PUNCTURE AT LEAST 1" VERTICALLY APART. 2. WHEN TWO SECTIONS OF SILT FENCE MATERIAL ADJOIN EACH OTHER, THEY SHALL BE OVERLAPPED ACROSS TWO POSTS. 3. MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PERFORMED AS NOTED IN THE SWPPP. DEPTH OF ACCUMULATED SEDIMENTS MAY NOT EXCEED ONE-HALF THE HEIGHT OF THE FABRIC. MAINTENANCE CLEANOUT MUST BE CONDUCTED REGULARLY TO PREVENT ACCUMULATED SEDIMENTS FROM REACHING ONE-HALF THE HEIGHT OF THE SIFT FENCE MATERIAL BEING ABOVE GRADE. 4. ALL SILT FENCE INLETS SHALL INCLUDE WIRE SUPPORT. POSTS: 2 x 4 WOODEN STAKE FENCE: WOVEN WIRE, 14-1/2 Ga., 6" MAX. MESH OPENING FABRIC: IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D 6461, LATEST EDITION80F SILT FENCE INLET PROTECTION N.T.S.N.T.S. 2% M A X . TOP OF RAMP WHEELCHAIR RAMP IN SIDEWALK N.T.S. SECTION A-A 48" MIN. LANDING 8.33% MAX. PLANA 48 " M I N . LA N D I N G MAX 2% M A X . 1: 1 2 A 5' M I N 4' MA X . 1:12 M A X 1:1 2 5' MIN. 2% MAX. ROUNDED 03A 4" MIN. CONCRETE SIDEWALK CURB AND GUTTER NOTES: 1. RAMP SIDE SLOPE VARIES UNIFORMLY FROM A MAXIMUM OF UP TO 1:10 AT CURB TO CONFORM WITH LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPE ADJACENT TO TOP OF THE RAMP. 2. CONSTRUCT PER A.D.A. STANDARDS. RAMP (WITH DETECTABLE WARNING) SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET. RAMP (WITH DETECTABLE WARNING) SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET. 62 CEI PROJECT NUMBER DATE PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD PROJECT MANAGER DESIGNER REVISION SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE CEI ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. REVISION NO.DESCRIPTION DATE C8.2 DETAIL SHEET III REV-1 7/24/2025 34335 BWB EVD TAB DR A W I N G L O C A T I O N - P: \ 3 4 0 0 0 \ 3 4 3 3 5 . 0 \ D R A W I N G S \ D E S I G N \ W O R K I N G \ 3 4 3 3 5 - C S . D W G - - S A V E D B Y - AM C D A N I E L © 2025 CEI ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. FAX: (479) 273-0844 PHONE: (479) 273-9472 BENTONVILLE, AR 72712 2600 NE 11TH ST, SUITE 300 WI N T E R S P R I N G S , FL O R I D A MI C H A E L B L A K E B L V D SE V E N B R E W 75C 74A 74A 70D 70D 75H 63 CEI PROJECT NUMBER DATE PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD PROJECT MANAGER DESIGNER REVISION SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE CEI ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. REVISION NO.DESCRIPTION DATE C8.3 DETAIL SHEET IV REV-1 7/24/2025 34335 BWB EVD TAB DR A W I N G L O C A T I O N - P: \ 3 4 0 0 0 \ 3 4 3 3 5 . 0 \ D R A W I N G S \ D E S I G N \ W O R K I N G \ 3 4 3 3 5 - C S . D W G - - S A V E D B Y - AM C D A N I E L © 2025 CEI ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. FAX: (479) 273-0844 PHONE: (479) 273-9472 BENTONVILLE, AR 72712 2600 NE 11TH ST, SUITE 300 WI N T E R S P R I N G S , FL O R I D A MI C H A E L B L A K E B L V D SE V E N B R E W 73C 73C 73C73C 73C 73C73C 73C 72B 72C 64 CEI PROJECT NUMBER DATE PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD PROJECT MANAGER DESIGNER REVISION SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE CEI ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. REVISION NO.DESCRIPTION DATE C8.4 DETAIL SHEET V REV-1 7/24/2025 34335 BWB EVD TAB DR A W I N G L O C A T I O N - P: \ 3 4 0 0 0 \ 3 4 3 3 5 . 0 \ D R A W I N G S \ D E S I G N \ W O R K I N G \ 3 4 3 3 5 - C S . D W G - - S A V E D B Y - AM C D A N I E L © 2025 CEI ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. FAX: (479) 273-0844 PHONE: (479) 273-9472 BENTONVILLE, AR 72712 2600 NE 11TH ST, SUITE 300 WI N T E R S P R I N G S , FL O R I D A MI C H A E L B L A K E B L V D SE V E N B R E W 72A 72A 72A 73A 73A 73A 73B 73B 73B 73B 65 3 5 7 . 6 5 ' 4 8 . 6 6 ' S50 ° 3 1 ' 5 8 " W NOR T H W E S T E R L Y BOU N D A R Y L I N E N 2 4 ° 1 0 ' 0 6 " W N 3 8 ° 4 3 ' 1 6 " W S V S T E S T S 49 ° 3 1 ' 3 5 " W 5 2 9 . 4 3 ' ( M ) S 50 ° 3 1 ' 5 8 " W 5 2 9 . 4 3 ' ( D ) N 3 9 ° 4 3 ' 3 9 " W 3 5 7 . 6 5 ' ( M ) N 3 8 ° 4 3 ' 1 6 " W 3 5 7 . 6 5 ' ( D ) S T A T E R O A D N O . 4 3 4 - O V I E D O R O A D ( R / W V A R I E S ) FLO R I D A T R A I L ( 5 0 ' R / W ) S 51 ° 3 7 ' 4 8 " W 2 3 2 . 1 2 ' ( C ) N 3 8 ° 2 8 ' 3 3 " W 1 8 8 . 7 1 ' ( C ) S 3 9 ° 3 6 ' 2 5 " E 1 6 4 . 3 7 ' ( M ) S 3 8 ° 4 3 ' 1 6 " E 1 6 4 . 5 1 ' ( C ) D W W W W W W W W S E A H A W K C O V E - 6 2 ' R O W W W W W W W W W NO P A R K I N G NO P A R K I N G N E W 1 S T O R Y B U I L D I N G 1 0 , 0 0 0 S . F . D A Y C A R E F A C I L I T Y 4 2 P A R K I N G S P A C E S S 30.45EP 29.57EP 30.45EP 29.55EP 31.82EP 30.88EP 30.73EP 30.69 30.69 30.63EP 31.52TC 32.38 32.78EP 30.15EP 31.11EP 31.80 31.39EP 33.36 33.40 32.00EP 33.27 32.13 29.32EP 30.18EP 31.58EP 32.14EP 32.45EP 30.63EP TW28.47 TW28.05 TW27.82 TW27.93 TW28.29 BW25.15 BW25.57 31.73EP 31.71EP 30.83EP 29.89EP BW24.92 BW??? BW25.03 D 32.50 32.38 32.74 32.00 3 0 3 0 3 1 3 0 2 9 2 8 2 6 2 7 F . F . = 3 2 . 5 0 32.38 32.48 32.48 32.45 31.95 31.95 32.45 32.35TC 32.00 33.59 32.07 31.55 31.63EP 31.02EP 30.23EP 31.85EP 31.85TC31.85EP 31.85TC31.85EP 32.35TC31.85EP 32.47TC31.97EP 32.28TC31.78EP 32.28TC31.78EP 32.00TC31.50EP 31.87TC31.37EP 32.45 32.35TC31.85EP 31.51TC31.01EP 29.12CB 29.76CB 30.47CB 30.50EP 30.12 30.61EP 30.57EP 31.17EP 31.62EP 30.36EP 31.28EP 31.52EP 33.28TC32.78EP 33.26TC32.76EP 33.02TC32.52EP 32.76TC32.26EP 32.50TC32.00EP 32.19TC31.79EP 33.07 32.81 32.55 32.44 32.24EP 32.38 31.85EP 31.48EP 31.64EP 32.55 30.75EP 32.20TC32.00EP 33.28TC 31 32 31 32 3 2 3 3 3 4 32 30 2931 3 5 VAN ST O P ST O P LA N E 2 LA N E 1 DO NO T E N T E R STO P 11 4 . 8 4 ' 12 8 . 8 3 ' 22' 22' 48 6.47 22.2 5.74 25.07 Pierce Arrow Xt Chassis Aerail Platform 100 Overall Length 48.000ftOverall Width 6.910ft Overall Body Height 10.241ft Min Body Ground Clearance 0.671ft Track Width 6.910ftLock-to-lock time 4.00s Wall to Wall Turning Radius 48.083ft 2 4 . 6 7 ' 20' 2 7 ' 27' 3 7 . 2 6 ' 2 0 ' CEI PROJECT NUMBER DATE PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD PROJECT MANAGER DESIGNER REVISION SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE CEI ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. REVISION NO.DESCRIPTION DATE C9.0 TURNING ANALYSIS PLAN REV-1 10/3/2025 34335 BWB EVD TAB DR A W I N G L O C A T I O N - P: \ 3 4 0 0 0 \ 3 4 3 3 5 . 0 \ D R A W I N G S \ D E S I G N \ W O R K I N G \ 3 4 3 3 5 - T P . D W G - - S A V E D B Y - AM C D A N I E L © 2025 CEI ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. FAX: (479) 273-0844 PHONE: (479) 273-9472 BENTONVILLE, AR 72712 2600 NE 11TH ST, SUITE 300 WI N T E R S P R I N G S , FL O R I D A MI C H A E L B L A K E B L V D SE V E N B R E W LEGEND SITE MICH A E L B L A K E B O U L E V A R D T R E E S W A L L O W D R . E A S T F L O R I D A 4 3 4 PROPOSED LEGEND PROPERTY LINE/RIGHT OF WAY LINE CURB INLET BUILDING CONTROL POINT PROPOSED PARKING SPACES LIMITS OF SIDEWALKS AND CONCRETE APRONS (PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. SEE DETAIL PAVING PLAN # VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE EXISTING LEGEND -**- = SOUTHEASTERN SURVEYING & MAPPING CORPORATION D S = SET 5/8" IRON ROD SSMC LB 2108 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED = CONCRETE MONUMENT = DRAINAGE MANHOLE = HAND HOLE = NAIL W/DISC = POST/BOLLARD = SEWER VALVE = TRAFFIC SIGN ABBREVIATION LEGEND: = DEED/DESCRIPTION DATA(D) L R Δ CH CB PRM ALTA NSPS ORB PG(S) LB PSM ID TRAV.PT. SSMC = TRAVERSE POINT = IDENTIFICATION = PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER = LICENSED BUSINESS = PAGE(S) = OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK = NATIONAL SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEY = AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION = PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT = CHORD BEARING = CHORD = DELTA = RADIUS = LENGTH SYMBOL LEGEND: HATCHING LEGEND: = CURB & GUTTER = CONCRETE LINETYPE LEGEND: = WIRE FENCE Know what's below. before you dig.Call 0 20'30'40' SCALE IN FEET GRATE INLET A.FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS ROADS PROVIDED AT THE START OF A PROJECT AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. (NFPA 1, 16.14). B.A SECOND ENTRANCE/EXIT MIGHT BE REQUIRED PER AHJ IF THE RESPONSE TIME FOR EMERGENCY IS EXCEEDED PER NFPA 1, SECTION 18.2.3.3 MULTIPLE ACCESS ROADS. C.WATER SUPPLY FOR FIRE PROTECTION, EITHER TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT, SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE AS SOON AS COMBUSTIBLE MATERIAL ACCUMULATES. THIS APPLIES TO BOTH COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS. (NFPA 1, 16.5.3.1). D.WHERE UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS AND HYDRANTS ARE TO BE PROVIDED, THEY SHALL BE INSTALLED, COMPLETED, AND IN SERVICE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION WORK. (NFPA 1, 16.4.3.1.3). E.FIRE FLOW TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 291, RECOMMENDED PRACTICE FOR FIRE FLOW TESTING. F.A 36 IN. CLEAR SPACE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AROUND THE CIRCUMFERENCE OF FIRE HYDRANTS AND A CLEAR SPACE OF NOT LESS THAN 60 IN. (1524 MM) SHALL BE PROVIDED IN FRONT OF EACH HYDRANT CONNECTION HAVING A DIAMETER GREATER THAN 21⁄2 IN. NFPA 1, 18.5.7. G.HYDRANT SHALL BE MARKED WITH A BLUE REFLECTOR THAT IS PLACED 6'' IN THE ROADWAY IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 1, CHAPTER 18.5.10. H.ACCESS TO GATED SUBDIVISIONS OR DEVELOPMENTS SHALL PROVIDE FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS THROUGH AN APPROVED SOS AND SEMINOLE COUNTY KNOX KEY SWITCH. NFPA 1, 18.2.2.2. NOTE: IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 18.4 AND TABLE 18.4.5.2.1 OF THE NFPA 1 FOR A TYPE II BUILDING OF 150 SQUARE FEET IS A REQUIRED FLOW OF 1,500 GPM FOR A DURATION OF 2 HOURS. (SECTION 18.2.3.4.3. NFPA 1) FIRE TRUCK PARAMETERS: a.PIERCE ARROW XT CHASSIS b.AERIAL PLATFORM 100' c.INSIDE CRAMP ANGLE: 40 DEGREES d.AXLE TRACK: 82.92 INCHES e.WHEEL OFFSET: 4.68 INCHES f.TREAD WIDTH: 16.3 INCHES g.CHASSIS OVERHANG: 78 INCHES h.ADDITIONAL BUMPER DEPTH: 26 INCHES i.FRONT OVERHANG: 137.6 INCHES j. WHEELBASE: 266 INCHES k.OVERALL LENGTH: 576 INCHES l.CALCULATED TURNING RADIUS: i.INSIDE TURN: 25 FT. 4 IN. ii.CURB TO CURB: 41 FT. 1 IN. iii.WALL TO WALL: 48 FT. 1 IN. iv.OVERALL LENGTH: 48 FT NOTE: 958 GPD WATER DEMAND, 400 GDP SANITARY AND 20 GPM PEAK. 66 N50°37'25"E 170.67' N3 9 ° 4 3 ' 4 3 " W 1 2 7 . 6 1 ' S50°37'28"W 170.12' S3 9 ° 2 8 ' 5 6 " E 1 2 7 . 6 1 ' ST E D6''SS 6''SS 6''SS ST O P ST O P 1' ' W UGE&T UGE&T UGE&T UGTUGT 1''W 1''W 1' ' W 1' ' W 1' ' W 1' ' W 1' ' W 1' ' W 1''W 1''W 25 ' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 5' BUILDING SETBACK 5' BUILDING SETBACK 15 ' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K E VAN LA N E 2 LA N E 1 DO NOT ENTER ST O P L1.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN N 0 20105 SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" 01 SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" LANDSCAPE PLAN BUILDING FFE 41.46 JD SHEET TITLE SHEET # CHECKED: DRAWN: DESIGN: SF SF PROJECT #25002 REVISION: FOR PERMIT ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION REVISIONS: # WI N T E R S P R I N G S , F L 3 4 7 1 4 Se v e n B r e w S C PAA A E E E E E R R R C T T TS D D G I I H CNL ADIROLF LA 6667380 STATE OF J A SO N S O N NIKCID This item has been electronically signed and sealed by JASON DICKINSON, PLA on the date and/or time stamp shown using a digital signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. DATE:10.21.2025 REV-4 ST A T E R O A D 4 3 4 SE A H A W K C O V E LAUGHING GULL LANE CODE QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME CONT CAL SIZE COMMENTS NOTES TREES CER FOR 3 FOREST PANSY EASTERN REDBUD CERCIS CANADENSIS 'FOREST PANSY'15 GAL 2" CAL 7`-8` HT., 3`-4` SPD.FULL CANOPY FLORIDA GRADE 1 LAG N40 2 NATCHEZ CRAPE MYRTLE LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA X FAURIEI 'NATCHEZ'30 GAL 2" CAL 10`-12` HT.; 3`-4` SPD.FULL CANOPY, SINGLE TRUNK FLORIDA GRADE 1 QUE VIR 4 SOUTHERN LIVE OAK QUERCUS VIRGINIANA 65 GAL 4" CAL 12`-14` HT.; 4`-5` SPD.FULL CANOPY; CENTRAL LEADER FLORIDA GRADE 1 ULM DRA 3 DRAKE LACEBARK ELM ULMUS PARVIFOLIA 'DRAKE'30 GAL 3" CAL 10`-12` HT.; 4`-5` SPD.FULL CANOPY; CENTRAL LEADER FLORIDA GRADE 1 CODE QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME CONT SPACING COMMENTS NOTES SHRUBS HAM CAL 3 CALUSA FIREBUSH HAMELIA PATENS 'CALUSA'36" HT. MIN. AT PLANTING 48" O.C.FULL FLORIDA GRADE 1 MUH FFW 30 FAST FORWARD PINK MUHLY GRASS MUHLENBERGIA CAPILLARIS 'FAST FORWARD'3 GAL 36" O.C.FULL FLORIDA GRADE 1 POD MAK 6 MAKI YEW PODOCARPUS PODOCARPUS MACROPHYLLUS 'MAKI'48" HT. MIN. AT PLANTING 48" O.C.FULL FLORIDA GRADE 1 RHA SNO 22 SNOWCAP® INDIAN HAWTHORN RHAPHIOLEPIS X DELACOURII 'CORLEYSCOURII'36" HT. MIN. AT PLANTING 48" O.C.FULL FLORIDA GRADE 1 ZAM PUM 44 COONTIE CYCAD ZAMIA PUMILA 3 GAL 36" O.C.FULL FLORIDA GRADE 1 CODE QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME CONT O.C.COMMENTS GROUND COVERS ASJ 47 ASIATIC JASMINE TRACHELOSPERMUM ASIATICUM 1 GAL 18" O.C.FULL PLANT SCHEDULE 2 - QUE VIR TRASH ENCLOSURE BAHIA SOD 2 - ULM DRA 47 - ASJ 19'-7"5'-10" 3'-0" EXISTING SIDEWALK 28'-6" 27' REQUIRED STREETSCAPE AREA BAHIA SOD BAHIA SOD 2 - ULM DRA 5 - MUH FFW 9 - ZAM PUM 5 - ZAM PUM 2 - ZAM PUM 5 - MUH FFW 4 - ZAM PUM 5 - MUH FFW 4 - ZAM PUM 3 - MUH FFW 5 - RHA SNO 4 - RHA SNO 3 - ZAM PUM 7 - MUH FFW 5 - MUH FFW 14 - ZAM PUM 5 - RHA SNO 3 - RHA SNO 3 - HAM CAL 1 - CER FOR 3 - ZAM PUM 6 - POD MAK 5 - RHA SNO 2 - CER FOR 2 - QUE VIR 2 - LAG N40 BAHIA SOD Digitally signed by Jason Dickinson Date: 2025.10.21 14:06:58-05'00' 67 L1.1 LANDSCAPE NOTES & DETAILS JD SHEET TITLE SHEET # CHECKED: DRAWN: DESIGN: SF SF PROJECT #25002 REVISION: FOR PERMIT ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION REVISIONS: # WI N T E R S P R I N G S , F L 3 4 7 1 4 Se v e n B r e w S C PAA A E E E E E R R R C T T TS D D G I I H CNL ADIROLF LA 6667380 STATE OF J A SO N S O N NIKCID This item has been electronically signed and sealed by JASON DICKINSON, PLA on the date and/or time stamp shown using a digital signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. DATE:10.21.2025 REV-4 03 SCALE: NTS SHRUB PLANTING02SCALE: NTS PALM TREE PLANTING PLANT SHRUB 1" ABOVE FINISH GRADE 2" OF MULCH FINISH GRADE PREPARED SOIL & FERTILIZER REFER TO NOTES EXISTING SOIL ON CENTER SPACING AS CALLED OUT ON PLANS STEEL BED EDGING 18" MIN. 2.5X WIDER THAN ROOT BALL DIAMETER UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF THE PLANT PIT EXISTING GRADE REMOVE ALL TWINE AND/OR WIRE BASKET AND TOP 1/3 OF THE BURLAP FROM ROOT BALL 4" - 6" SAUCER ABOVE FINISHED GRADE SPECIFIED MULCH AT 3" DEPTH - DO NOT PLACE AGAINST TRUNK CAREFULLY REMOVE ANY EXCESS SOIL ON TOP OF ROOT BALL TO EXPOSE ROOT FLARES BACKFILL WITH AMENDED SOIL AS SPECIFIED 6' LONG GREEN T-POST - EMBED INTO UNDISTURBED SOIL TO A DEPTH OF 24". PLACE POSTS ON OPPOSITE SIDES OF THE TRUNK IN LINE WITH PREVAILING WINDS AND SET POSTS AT A UNIFORM HEIGHT. TOP OF ROOT BALL 2" ABOVE FINISH GRADE 3/4" TREE STRAPS WITH GROMMETS 3/8" JUTE ROPE ELEVATE CENTER OF PIT 4" AND COMPACT TO PREVENT SETTLING 2.5X WIDER THAN ROOT BALL DIAMETER UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF THE PLANT PIT EXISTING GRADE 4" - 6" SAUCER ABOVE FINISHED GRADE SPECIFIED MULCH AT 3" DEPTH - DO NOT PLACE AGAINST TRUNK BACKFILL WITH AMENDED SOIL AS SPECIFIED TWO LAYERS OF BURLAP TO PROTECT PALM TRUNK FIVE 2" x 8" x 8" P.T. WOOD BATTENS WITH TWO STEEL BANDS TO SECURE BATTENSTHREE 2" x 4" P.T. WOOD BRACES TOE NAIL TO BATTENS. DRIVE BRACES INTO UNDISTURBED EARTH ELEVATE CENTER OF PIT 4" AND COMPACT TO PREVENT SETTLING TOP OF ROOT BALL 2" ABOVE FINISH GRADE CAREFULLY REMOVE ANY EXCESS SOIL ON TOP OF ROOT BALL TO EXPOSE ROOT FLARES 01 SCALE: NTS DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING GENERAL NOTES 1.Call 811 for locate of underground utilities. Contact prior to digging. Contractor shall be responsible for any damage caused to the utilities (both overhead and buried) which may occur due to his action or lack thereof on the project site during landscape or irrigation installation. Contractor shall seek the assistance of local utilities and the owner in locating the utilities prior to performing trenching operations in any area. 2.The contractor is responsible for maintaining all areas (including watering, spraying, mulching, mowing, fertilizing, etc.) until the job is accepted, in full, by owner and/or Landscape Architect. 6.The landscape contractor is responsible for confirming the quantities of each plant material required to adequately cover the area shown on the landscape plans at the prescribed spacing and notifying the landscape architect immediately of any perceived discrepancies a min. of two (2) working days prior to planting. SOIL PREPARATION NOTES 1.The top 8” of planting bed soil shall consist of the following: Native or imported topsoil 5 inches Cotton Burr Compost 2 inches Aged Sterilized Cow Manure 1 inch 2.Till the 8” of soil mix into the next 6” of soil to obtain 14” of weed free de-compacted soil. Stones over 2” to be removed from the soil. 3.Incorporate Roots Transplant One-Step at a rate of 5 pounds per 100 square feet, and Dry Molasses at a rate of 3 pounds per 100 square feet into the top 4" of the soil. 4.Landscaped parking lot islands shall be excavated to a minimum depth of 24" and backfilled with 16" of top soil and 8" of planting bed soil described above. 5.Apply Roundup (or equal) according to manufacturer's rate and specification within limits of all areas to be planted. Protect existing plants to remain from over spray or spray within root zone. Contractor to ensure total weed eradication. PLANTING NOTES 1.The landscape architect reserves the right to review and approve all plant materials if requested, at the source nursery with the landscape contractor prior to delivery to the job site. 2.All root balls shall conform to the standards set forth in "American Standards for Nursery Stock". 3.Each tree shall be backfilled with 3 cubic feet of Back to Nature cotton burr compost and 1 cubic foot of aged, sterilized cow manure mixed thoroughly with the native topsoil. Apply Roots Transplant One-Step at a rate of 4 ounces per caliper inch and 2 cups of dry molasses per tree and incorporate into the top 4" of soil. 4.For evergreen shrub and tree planting, apply Wilt-Pruf anti-desicant spray at a rate of 1:10 (Wilt-Pruf to water) the same day as planting. 5.All plant material shall be protected during transport and delivery to final location with shade cloth or other acceptable means of windburn prevention. 6.All trees must be guyed or staked as shown in the details. 7.All plant material shall be installed in a sound, workman-like manner and according to accepted good planting and tree relocation procedures with quality plant materials. All elements of landscaping shall be installed so as to meet all applicable ordinances and code requirements. 8.Contractor shall assure proper drainage and percolation of all planting pits prior to installation of plant material, and correct as necessary. Contractor is responsible for replacement of all plants lost due to inadequate drainage conditions. 9.Contractor to replace rejected plant material within two (2) weeks of written notice. 10.Contractor shall mulch all plant material throughout and completely to a two-inch (2") depth of loose, weed free sterilized cedar mulch unless noted otherwise in plans or specifications. All disturbed areas to be covered with sod, mulch, planting, or gravel at completion of project. No bare soil shall remain on property or adjacent properties. 11.All planting beds shall be delineated as shown on the plan with 3/16" x 4" steel edging, unless noted otherwise. LAWN NOTES 1.Sod all areas as shown on plans and all disturbed areas with solid 'CitraBlue' St. Augstine sod. 2.Top soil shall be free of weeds and foreign material immediately before sodding. 3.Lay sod with closely fitted joints leaving no voids and with ends of sod strips staggered. Sod shall be laid within 24 hours of harvesting. 4.Tamp and roll sod with appropriate equipment to eliminate minor irregularities and to form close contact with soil bed immediately after planting and watering. 5.Fertilize Sod 30 - 60 days after installation. Apply fertilizer according to the time of installation: Apr. 15 - Sept. 15; apply 16-2-8 fertilizer at a rate of 1 lb. of nitrogen per 1,000 s.f. of lawn area. 6.Provide adequate water to prevent desiccation and for optimal establishment. LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS SITE DATA TOTAL SITE AREA:21,744 S.F. TREE REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED PROVIDED NO FEWER THAN SIX (6) TREES PER SITE 6 6 SITE REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED PROVIDED 36 INCH MIN. HT. OF LANDSCAPE AROUND DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE AT TIME OF PLANTING YES YES S.R. 434 STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED PROVIDED MINIMUM OF 27' IN WIDTH YES YES TREES FROM APPROVED SPECIES LIST YES YES Digitally signed by Jason Dickinson Date: 2025.10.21 14:07:12-05'00' 68 N50°37'25"E 170.67' N3 9 ° 4 3 ' 4 3 " W 1 2 7 . 6 1 ' S50°37'28"W 170.12' S3 9 ° 2 8 ' 5 6 " E 1 2 7 . 6 1 ' ST E D6''SS 6''SS 6''SS ST O P ST O P 1' ' W UGE&T UGE&T UGE&T UGTUGT 1''W 1''W 1' ' W 1' ' W 1' ' W 1' ' W 1' ' W 1' ' W 1''W 1''W 25 ' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 5' BUILDING SETBACK 5' BUILDING SETBACK 15 ' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K E VAN LA N E 2 LA N E 1 DO NOT ENTER ST O P 3 4 " 3 4 " 3 4 " 3 4 " 3 4 " 3 4 " 3 4 " 1" 3 4 " 3 4 " 3 4 " 3 4 " 3 4 " 3 4 " 3 4 "3 4 "3 4 " 3 4 " 3 4 " 1" 1"1" 3 4 " 3 4 " 3 4 " 3 4 " 3 4 " 1" 1" 1" E E E A A SS RC E E E SSSSSSSSSS E E AA SS SS SS SS SS A Q Q CC Q C C C A A A A A A A A AA C C C A A AA 1" 3 4 " 3 4 " 3 4 " 3 4 " 3 4 " 3 4 " 3 4 " 3 4 " 1" 3 4 " 3 4 " 3 4 " 11 2 " 1 1 2 " 1 1 2 " 11 2 " 1 1 2 " 11 2 "11 2 " C C 1" 1" 3 4 " 3 4 " 3 4 " drip 340gph #1 1" 13gpm #4 1" 11gpm #5 drip 485gph #2 1" 11gpm #5 1" 13gpm #3 E E E E E 3 4 " L2.0 IRRIGATION PLAN N 0 20105 SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" 01 SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" IRRIGATION PLAN BUILDING FFE 41.46 JD SHEET TITLE SHEET # CHECKED: DRAWN: DESIGN: SF SF PROJECT #25002 REVISION: FOR PERMIT ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION REVISIONS: # WI N T E R S P R I N G S , F L 3 4 7 1 4 Se v e n B r e w S C PAA A E E E E E R R R C T T TS D D G I I H CNL ADIROLF LA 6667380 STATE OF J A SO N S O N NIKCID This item has been electronically signed and sealed by JASON DICKINSON, PLA on the date and/or time stamp shown using a digital signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. DATE:10.24.2025 REV-4 ST A T E R O A D 4 3 4 SE A H A W K C O V E LAUGHING GULL LANE 1" DCVA-TYPE BACKFLOW PREVENTER 1 1 1 3 4 1 1" IRRIGATION METER w/14gpm @65psi REQUIRED. WILKINS 950XL - 1" DCVA BACKFLOW PREVENTER ASSY. HUNTER WR-CLIK WIRELESS RAIN / FREEZE SENSOR IRRIGATION LEGEND RAINBIRD 3RC QUICK COUPLING VALVE (PROVIDE 2 KEYS)Q RAINBIRD 1804-SAM-P45 4" POP-UP with R-VAN-14 ROTARY NOZZLE RAINBIRD 1804-SAM-P45 4" POP-UP with R-VAN-18 ROTARY NOZZLE RAINBIRD 1804-SAM-P45 4" POP-UP with R-VAN-RCS ROTARY NOZZLE RAINBIRD 1804-SAM-P45 4" POP-UP with R-VAN-SST ROTARY NOZZLE A C PVC CL200 LATERAL PIPING 1-1/2" PVC SCH40 MAINLINE PIPING NETAFIM TECHLINE HCVXR-7-12 DRIP TUBING RAINBIRD 100PEB 1" ZONE CONTROL VALVE with FLOW CONTROL RAINBIRD XCZ-100-PRB-COM 1" DRIP ZONE VALVE ASSEMBLY QUANTITIES SHOWN FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CALCULATE ALL MATERIALS NECESSARY FOR A COMPLETE IRRIGATION SYSTEM. 19 8 11 SS RC cc HUNTER HCC-800-M 8-STATION IRRIGATION CONTROLLER REMOTE CONTROL VIA SMARTPHONE with WIFI AND ET BASED USING BUILT-IN “HYDRAWISE” SOFTWARE TO SCHEDULE RUN-TIMES BASED ON LOCAL WEATHER DATA 1 14' 17' 15' 15' RADIUS SPRAY TREC H T C MI E M DE OMC N R C S I E G R I A L G N R 003375 DIFI E I N O L E I T A I R G Y LLELD.A 10/24/2 0 2 5 1 RAINBIRD 1804-SAM-P45 4" POP-UP with R-VAN-24 ROTARY NOZZLE13 23'E QUICK COUPLING VALVE PROPOSED 1" IRRIGATION WATER METER 11 2 " QUICK COUPLING VALVE QUICK COUPLING VALVE IRIGATION CONTROLLER RAIN / FREEZE SENSOR DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE 1. GENERAL IRRIGATION NOTES CALL 811 FOR INFORMATION ON THE LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. 3. CONTACT PRIOR TO DIGGING. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE CAUSED TO THE UTILITIES (BOTH OVERHEAD AND BURIED) WHICH MAY OCCUR DUE TO HIS ACTION OR LACK OF ACTION ON THE PROJECT SITE DURING LANDSCAPE OR IRRIGATION INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL SEEK THE ASSISTANCE OF LOCAL UTILITIES AND THE OWNER IN LOCATING THE UTILITIES PRIOR TO PERFORMING TRENCHING OPERATIONS IN ANY AREA. CONTRACTOR SHALL CAREFULLY VERIFY A MINIMUM DYNAMIC WATER PRESSURE OF 65PSI @14 GPM ADJACENT TO THE WATER METER LOCATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER IF ACTUAL READING IS SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT AND SHALL RECEIVE OWNER'S APPROVAL PRIOR TO BEGINNING INSTALLATION OPERATIONS. TRENCHING OPERATIONS SHALL NOT OCCUR UNDER THE DRIPLINE OF EXISTING TREES UNLESS ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY. IF CONDITIONS DO NOT ALLOW FOR TRENCHING TO BE DIRECTED AROUND DRIPLINE, THEN HAND TRENCHING WILL BE REQUIRED. PLOWING IN OF IRRIGATION PIPING IS NOT PERMITTED. THE IRRIGATION DESIGN IS DIAGRAMMATIC. THE INTENT OF THE DRAWINGS IS TO SHOW THE GENERAL LAYOUT AND LOGIC OF THE SYSTEM. SCALED MEASUREMENTS MAY NOT BE ACCURATE. ACTUAL LOCATIONS AND QUANTITIES OF PIPE AND FITTINGS MAY VARY DUE TO FIELD ADJUSTMENTS FOR EXISTING AND NEW TREES AND OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS TO PROVIDE THE PROPER AND INTENDED COVERAGE. ADJUST HEADS AS REQUIRED FOR PROPER COVERAGE IF LOCATIONS OF SIGNS AND OTHER SITE ELEMENTS ARE NOT AS SHOWN. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLOSELY FOLLOWING THESE CONTRACT DRAWINGS, THE IRRIGATION SPECIFICATIONS, AND THE SPECIFIED RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURES TO INSURE PROPER INSTALLATION OF THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY CONSULT WITH THE OWNER WHENEVER THERE APPEARS TO BE A CONFLICT BETWEEN ANY OF THE ABOVE STATED DOCUMENTS. INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT PER MANUFACTURER'S CURRENT SPECIFICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. SPRINKLER SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDING WITH ALL APPLICABLE CITY AND STATE ORDINANCES AND PLUMBING CODES. ALL IRRIGATED AREAS SHALL HAVE 100% COVERAGE. BACKFILL AROUND THE PIPE SHALL BE FREE OF ROCKS AND OTHER DEBRIS, AND TO LEAVE NO DEPRESSIONS. TESTING: UPON COMPLETION OF THE INSTALLATION, THE ENTIRE SYSTEM SHALL BE TESTED AND ADJUSTED FOR PROPER OPERATION. 4. 6. 7. 10. 12. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSURE THAT THE IRRIGATION MAINLINE, VALVES AND VALVE WIRES ARE INSTALLED WITHIN THE PROPERTY AND WATER EASEMENT LINES. ANY LINES SHOWN OUTSIDE OF NORMAL INSTALLATION CORRIDORS ARE FOR PRESENTATION PURPOSES ONLY. 8. 9.SET ALL LAWN HEADS FLUSH WITH FINISHED GRADE. ALLOW FOR INSTALLATION OF SOD. ALL POP-UP SPRINKLER HEADS SHALL DIRECT FLOW AWAY FROM ANY ADJACENT SURFACE AND SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED CLOSER THAN FOUR INCHES FROM A HARDSCAPE, SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, A BUILDING FOUNDATION, FENCE, CONCRETE, ASPHALT, PAVERS, OR STONES SET WITH MORTAR. 13. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE 1" IRRIGATION WATER METER AS SHOWN. IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL SPECIFIED BACKFLOW PREVENTER AT THE LOCATION SHOWN ON THE DRAWING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ANY MINOR ADJUSTMENTS, AS NECESSARY, TO THE IRRIGATION LAYOUT BASED ON ANY FUTURE SITE PLAN CHANGES. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFLECT SUCH CHANGES ON THE AS-BUILT IRRIGATION DRAWINGS. ANY CHANGES TO THE PLANS WHICH RESULT IN "ADDS" OR "DEDUCTS" TO THE COST SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 11. PROVIDE A FIELD TRAINING SESSION FOR THE OWNER'S MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL. PROVIDE 'AS-BUILT' DRAWINGS OF THE COMPLETED IRRIGATION SYSTEMS. PROVIDE A COLOR-CODED ZONE CHART, TO BE PLACED IN A CLEAR PLASTIC SLEEVE INSIDE THE CONTROLLER DOORS.. 14. IRRIGATION PLANS PREPARED BY MITCHELL LANGLEY - A CERTIFIED IRRIGATION DESIGNER WITH IRRIGATION ASSOCIATION, AN EPA WATERSENSE PARTNER IN GOOD STANDING AND A PROFESSIONAL MEMBER OF AMERICAN SOCIETY OF IRRIGATION CONSULTANTS. 15. GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING A J-BOX WITH 115VAC; 1PHASE POWER AT THE CONTROLLER LOCATION. IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL HARDWIRE CONTROLLER FROM J-BIX 5. PVC SCH40 SLEEVING (SIZE & BORE AS NOTED) 4" SCH40 PVC SLEEVE BORE UNDER EXISTING WALK FOR 2" SCH40 PVC SLEEVE BORE UNDER EXISTING WALK FOR 2" SCH40 PVC SLEEVE BORE UNDER EXISTING WALK FOR 2" SCH40 PVC SLEEVE Digitally signed by Jason Dickinson Date: 2025.10.24 09:06:21-05'00' 69 L2.1 IRRIGATION DETAILS FINISH G R A D E 18" PVC O-RING SWING JOINT QCV VALVE KEY BRASS HOSE SWIVEL COMPACTED CLEAN GRAVEL QUICK COUPLING VALVE PVC MAINLINE 10" ROUND VALVE BOX WITH LOCKING GREEN LID ADJUST ANGLE OF SWING JOINT ARM BETWEEN 30 AND 45 DEG TO ALLOW ADEQUATE IMPACT ABSORPTION QUICK COUPLING VALVE INSTALLATION DETAIL KEYS & SWIVELS INSTALL QCV SO THAT TOP IS NEAR FINISH GRADE BUT SO IT DOESN'T INTERFERE WITH INSTALLING VALVE BOX COVER PROVIDE OWNER WITH ZONE VALVE ASSEMBLY PVC MAINLINESCH80 PVC ELL TT SCH80 PVC TRU-UNION PVC LATERAL PIPING RAINBIRD WC-20 WIRE COIL 6" GRAVEL LAYER FLOW MAINLINE SVC TEE RAINBIRD VBSTD RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX WITH LOCKING GREEN LID INSTALLATION DETAIL SCH80 PVC NIPPLES SCH80 PVC NIPPLE RAINBIRD 100 PEB CONTROL VALVE AVERAGE APPLICATION RATE = .85" / HR WATERPROOF WIRE CONNECTORS WIRE COIL 1" DRIP ZONE VALVE ASSY WITH PSI REG & LXIVMSOL) (INCL. VALVES, FILTER PVC MAINLINE PVC ELL CL200 PVC DRIP LINE PIPING6" GRAVEL LAYER DRIP ZONE VALVE ASSY. & CONNECTION POINT INSTALLATION DETAIL FINISH GRADE MULCH DRIPLINE TUBING 3/4" PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE 3/4" BALL VALVE TT VALVE BOX - TOP 9" x 14"10" ROUND VALVE BOX RAINBIRD XCZ-PRB-100-COM TECHLINE PRESSURE COMPENSATING DRIP TUBING WITH CHECK VALVE HCVXR-7-12 - FLOW RATE = .77GPH DRIPPER SPACING = 12"O.C. STANDARD RECTANGULAR RAINBIRD VB SERIES SUPPLY HEADER SBE-050 BARBED ELBOW MODEL 1804-SAM-P45 12" FINISH G R A D E PVC 1/2" THREADED TEE PVC LATERAL LINE INSTALLATION DETAIL 4" POP-UP TURF SPRAY 1/2" SWING PIPE SBE-050 BARBED ELBOW POP-UP SPRAY USING STREAM ROTARY NOZZLES 120V; 20AMP IN J-BOX TO HARDWIRE CONTROLLER 48" ABOVE GRADE REFER TO THE HUNTER HCC, HYDRAWISE WIFI SOFTWARE AND HC-FLOW METER INSTALLATION GUIDES FOR FURTHER INSTRUCTIONS. INSTALL WIFI-EXT-KIT WIFI ANTENNA EXTENSION KIT IF NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE RELIABLE SIGNAL STRENGTH NOTES HUNTER HCC-800-M WITH ICM-800 8-STATION MODULE WALL MOUNT SMART IRRIGATION CONTROLLER WIRELESS RAIN / FREEZE RECEIVER HUNTER WRF-CLIK 5/8" DIA. x 10'-0" UL LISTED COPPER CLAD GROUND ROD. #6 AWG BARE COPPER WIRE TO GROUNDING ROD OR GROUNDING PLATE EARTH CONTACT MATERIAL COPPER GROUND PLATE (4" X 96" X .0625") GROUNDING TO HAVE A RESISTANCE OF TEN (10) OHMS OR LESS.1-1/2" CONDUITS FOR GROUND AND IRRIGATIOIN CONTROL WIRES MAXIMUM LINE OF SIGHT FROM RAIN/FREEZE NOTE: WIRELESS TRANSMITTER DISTANCE IS LESS IF OBSTRUCTIONS EXIST. RAIN / FREEZE SENSOR SENSOR TO RECEIVER IS 300-FT. LIGHT POLE 15' ABOVE FINISH GRADE INSTALLATION DETAIL RAIN / FREEZE SENSOR SENSOR: SOCKET CEMENT NEVER LAY PVC PIPE WHEN THERE IS WATER IN THE TRENCH INSTALLATION DETAIL PVC ASSEMBLING NEVER LAY PVC PIPE WHEN THE TEMPERATURE IS 32deg F OR BELOW CLEAN NOTES: PRIMER PVC CEMENT INSERT PIPE AND HOLD FORINTO FITTING SURFACE CEMENT CEMENT PVC 15 SECONDS TURN 1/4 TURN FINISH GRADE PAVEMENT TYPICAL SLEEVING INSTALLATION DETAIL 18" DEPTH PVC SCH40 SLEEVE (SIZE AS NOTED) SOLVENT WELD CAPS (BOTH ENDS OF SLEEVES) 24" TYP. 36" TYP. STUDDED "T" FENCE POST 18" TYP.(PAINTED BLUE) MAINLINE, LATERAL & WIRING INSTALLATION DETAIL LATERAL NOTES: 12 " 18 " 12 " WIRE PATH MAIN SUPPLY TIE A LOOSE 20" LOOP IN ALL WIRING AT CHANGES OF DIRECTION GREATER THAN 30deg. UNTIE ALL LOOPS AFTER CONNECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE. BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE FREE FROM ROCKS OR HEAVY UNSUITABLE SUBSTANCES WHICH COULD DAMAGE THE PIPE OR CREATE UNUSUAL SETTLING PROBLEMS. BACKFILL SHALL BE DONE IN SIX INCH LAYERS AND TAMPED DOWN AFTER EACH LAYER IS PUT BACK TO PREVENT EXCESSIVE SETTLING. WIRE CONNECTORS MOUNTING BRACKET: INSTALLED WITH CURVED END POINTED UP INSTALLATION DETAIL IRRIGATION CONTROLLER 15" - 18" TLTEE - NETAFIM INSERT TEE TLELL - NETAFIM INSERT ELBOW INSTALLATION DETAIL DRIP TUBING LAYOUT SPACING CONNECTION POINT TO SCH40 PVC LATERAL LINE INSTALL (1) #OPERIND - RAINBIRD DRIP SYSTEM OPERATION INDICATOR KIT IN AN INCONSPICUOUS LOCATION FOR EACH ZONE TLSOV - LINE FLUSHING VALVE IN 10" ROUND VALVE BOX TIE DOWN STAKE INSTALL 3' O.C. ON ALL TUBING EXHAUST HEADER SUPPLY HEADER IN 10" ROUND VALVE BOX COVER WITH MULCH LAYER AS SPECIFIED ON LANDSCAPE PLANS 11 2 5 64 3 9 10 8 2 7 1" IRRIGATION METER LINE FROM 6" GRAVEL LAYER FINISH GRADE INSTALLATION DETAIL EMERGENCY SHUTOFF VALVE (2) JUMBO VALVE BOXES & DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSY 1-1/2" IRRIGATION MAINLINE DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSY WILKINS 1" 950XLS 1" GATE VALVE 1 TREC H T C MI E M DE OMC N R C S I E G R I A L G N R 003375 D IFI E I N O L E I T A I R G Y LLELD.A 10/24/2 0 2 5 JD SHEET TITLE SHEET # CHECKED: DRAWN: DESIGN: SF SF PROJECT #25002 REVISION: FOR PERMIT ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION REVISIONS: # WI N T E R S P R I N G S , F L 3 4 7 1 4 Se v e n B r e w S C PAA A E E E E E R R R C T T TS D D G I I H CNL ADIROLF LA 6667380 STATE OF J A SO N S O N NIKCID This item has been electronically signed and sealed by JASON DICKINSON, PLA on the date and/or time stamp shown using a digital signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. DATE:10.24.2025 REV-4 Digitally signed by Jason Dickinson Date: 2025.10.24 09:06:45-05'00' 70 71 PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT 7Brew - Winter Springs Michael Blake Boulevard Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida Prepared for: CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. 2600 NE 11th Street Bentonville, Arkansas 72712 Prepared by: TTL, Inc. 624 Grassmere Park, Suite 14 Nashville, Tennessee 37211 Project No. 240803190.00 Project Initiation Date: November 21, 2024 Report Date: December 13, 2024 72 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report 7Brew – Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida December 13, 2024 TTL Project No. 240803190.00 page i TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 3 2.0 SITE AND VICINITY INFORMATION ............................................................................................ 4 2.1 Subject Property Location and Description.......................................................................... 4 2.2 Subject Property Improvements ........................................................................................... 4 2.3 Current Property Use ............................................................................................................. 4 2.4 Current Uses of Surrounding Properties .............................................................................. 4 2.5 Subject Property Topography, Surface Drainage, and Subsurface Conditions ................. 5 3.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION ............................................................................................... 6 3.1 Title Information .................................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Previous Environmental Assessment Reports ..................................................................... 6 3.3 User Questionnaire ................................................................................................................ 6 4.0 REGULATORY RECORDS REVIEW ............................................................................................. 7 5.0 HISTORICAL RECORDS RESEARCH .......................................................................................... 9 6.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE .......................................................................................................... 10 6.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions ................................................................................. 10 6.2 General Subject Property Setting ......................................................................................... 10 6.3 Building Observations ........................................................................................................... 10 6.4 Property Observations .......................................................................................................... 10 6.5 Specific Property Considerations ......................................................................................... 10 7.0 INTERVIEWS .............................................................................................................................. 12 7.1 Interview with the Representative of the Current Subject Property Owner ....................... 12 7.2 Interview with Emergency Response Personnel ................................................................. 12 7.3 Other Interviews .................................................................................................................... 12 8.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................... 13 8.1 Summary of Findings ............................................................................................................ 13 8.2 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................... 14 9.0 OPINION OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL ................................................................... 16 10.0 SIGNATURES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS ..................................................... 17 11.0 LIMITATIONS ........................................................................................................................... 18 11.1 Purpose.................................................................................................................................. 18 11.2 Scope of Services.................................................................................................................. 19 73 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report 7Brew – Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida December 13, 2024 TTL Project No. 240803190.00 page ii 11.3 Project Limitations/Data Gaps ............................................................................................. 20 11.4 Non-Scope Considerations ................................................................................................... 21 11.5 Special Terms and Conditions ............................................................................................. 21 11.6 User Reliance ........................................................................................................................ 21 12.0 REFERENCES .......................................................................................................................... 23 APPENDICES SITE LOCATION TOPOGRAPHIC & AERIAL MAP .......................................................... APPENDIX A REGULATORY RECORDS INFORMATION ..................................................................... APPENDIX B HISTORICAL DOCUMENTS ........................................................................................... APPENDIX C SITE PHOTOGRAPHS .................................................................................................... APPENDIX D ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL RÉSUMÉS ............................................................ APPENDIX E 74 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report 7Brew – Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida December 13, 2024 TTL Project No. 240803190.00 page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TTL, Inc. (TTL) was retained by CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. (CEI) to perform a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) for the property located southeast of the intersection of Michael Blake Boulevard and East Florida 434 in Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida. According to the Seminole County Property Assessment Database, the subject property is a 0.7-acre tract portion of Parcel ID 26-20-30-5AR-0A00-007L (owned by Tuskawilla Retail Partners II, LLC). The subject property is currently undeveloped land. A topographic location map, derived from a portion of the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Casselberry, Florida 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle is included as Figure 1 (Appendix A). An aerial photograph that depicts the subject property, approximate property boundary, and surrounding properties is included as Figure 2. Summary of Findings and Conclusions TTL completed a reconnaissance of the subject property on December 2, 2024. The subject property consists of one square-shaped tract consisting of 0.7-acres located southeast of the intersection of Michael Blake Boulevard and East Florida 434 in Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida. The subject property is currently undeveloped land. Surrounding properties consist of multi-family residential development and commercial businesses. The subject property is accessed from the northwest adjoining property which is accesses via Michael Blake Boulevard. In its current state the subject property is overgrown grass and tree-covered. The subject property is bounded by undeveloped land to the northwest, northeast, and southeast, with East Florida 434 to the southwest. Historically, the subject property has been undeveloped land dating back to at least the early 1940s. Surrounding properties saw an increase in residential and commercial development between 2017 to 2019. ERIS identified the subject property as being located within the City of Winter Springs Brownfield Area. This brownfield listing is part of a City of Winter Springs and local economic council resolution for an overall “brownfield area” where some sites may or may not be contaminated to help support economic development in the Winter Springs area. Based on review of historical information for the subject property the Town Center S.E.E.D. / City of Winter Springs Brownfield Area listing does not represent a significant environmental concern with respect to the subject property. ERIS identified 7-Eleven Store #34786 / Mobil R/S #1091B 639.91ft. northeast of the subject property on the DWM CONTAM, UST, and STCS databases. TTL reviewed technical files from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection Oculus data viewer concerning the facility. In 1993 an 75 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report 7Brew – Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida December 13, 2024 TTL Project No. 240803190.00 page 2 unknown amount of free product was found in a monitoring well on the site. In 2013 a site assessment of the site revealed no soil impacts above the permissible regulatory levels and only one monitoring well location revealed a contaminant detection (benzene) above permissible limits. In March 2020 additional assessment of the site was conducted with soil and groundwater impacts not identified at the site above permissible limits, including two consecutive “clean rounds” from the previous location that revealed the benzene detection above permissible limits. The groundwater monitoring wells were then abandoned for the site. Based on review of regulatory information the 7-Eleven Store #34786 / Mobil R/S #1091B does not represent a REC with respect to the subject property. Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) RECs were not identified by this assessment. Historic Recognized Environmental Conditions (HRECs) HRECs were not identified by this assessment. Controlled Recognized Environmental Conditions (CRECs) CRECs were not identified by this assessment. De Minimis Environmental Conditions De minimis environmental conditions were not identified by this assessment. Business Environmental Risks This Phase I ESA does not include the assessment of non-scope considerations. Significant Data Gaps Significant data gaps were not identified by this assessment. Opinion of Environmental Professional TTL has performed this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E1527-21 of a subject property located southeast of the intersection of Michael Blake Boulevard and East Florida 434 in Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are discussed in Section 2 of this report. This assessment has not revealed RECs in connection with the subject property that may warrant further assessment or investigation. 76 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report 7Brew – Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida December 13, 2024 TTL Project No. 240803190.00 page 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION TTL, Inc. (TTL) was retained by CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. (CEI) to perform a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) for the property located southeast of the intersection of Michael Blake Boulevard and East Florida 434 in Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida. According to the Seminole County Property Assessment Database, the subject property is a 0.7-acre tract portion of Parcel ID 26-20-30-5AR-0A00-007L (owned by Tuskawilla Retail Partners II, LLC). The subject property is currently undeveloped land. A topographic location map, derived from a portion of the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Casselberry, Florida 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle is included as Figure 1 (Appendix A). An aerial photograph that depicts the subject property, approximate property boundary, and surrounding properties is included as Figure 2. TTL performed this Phase I ESA in general accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) specification ASTM E1527-21, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process. The ASTM E1527-21 Standard is intended to satisfy the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) All Appropriate Inquiry (AAI) Rule as defined in Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Section 101(14) (312.1(c)). This report presents the findings of the Phase I ESA performed at the subject property subject to the scope of work and limitations outlined in Section 11 of this report. Pursuant to ASTM E1527-21 Section 4.6, the continued viability of this Phase I ESA report depends on the dates that certain components of the Phase I ESA were initiated. For this report, the first component to be initiated was ordering the ERIS Database Report on November 21, 2024. Therefore, the requirement to update certain components of this report after 180 days started on that date. 77 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report 7Brew – Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida December 13, 2024 TTL Project No. 240803190.00 page 4 2.0 SITE AND VICINITY INFORMATION 2.1 Subject Property Location and Description The subject property consists of one square-shaped tract consisting of 0.7-acres located southeast of the intersection of Michael Blake Boulevard and East Florida 434 in Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida. The subject property is currently undeveloped land. Surrounding properties consist of multi- family residential development and commercial businesses. 2.2 Subject Property Improvements The subject property is currently unimproved. The northern portion of the subject property is grass- covered with increasing shrubs and trees further to the south. 2.3 Current Property Use The subject property is currently undeveloped land. 2.4 Current Uses of Surrounding Properties Direction Description North Mixed-use residential and commercial development are located on the northern adjoining properties. East The eastern adjoining properties are wooded and undeveloped. South Southern adjoining properties are wooded and undeveloped. West The Savoy Gracious Retirement Living facility is located on the western adjoining property. 78 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report 7Brew – Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida December 13, 2024 TTL Project No. 240803190.00 page 5 2.5 Subject Property Topography, Surface Drainage, and Subsurface Conditions PHYSICAL SETTING INFORMATION Physical Setting Reviewed Comments Source USGS Topographic Map Review: Elevation across the subject property is higher along the southeastern boundary (45 ft above mean sea level [amsl]) sloping to the northwest to the lowest elevation along the northwestern property boundary (40 ft amsl). U.S. Geological Survey, Topographic Map, Casselberry, Florida 7.5-minute quadrangle Interpreted Groundwater Flow Direction: Shallow groundwater beneath the subject property is assumed to flow northwest towards lower elevations. U.S. Geological Survey, Topographic Map, Casselberry, Florida 7.5-minute quadrangle Water Bodies: Water bodies were not observed on the subject property during the site reconnaissance. Site Inspection Observations Soil Type(s): Fine sands USDA Web Soil Survey via ERIS Geologic Formation(s): Undifferentiated Sediments - Qu USGS Geology via ERIS 79 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report 7Brew – Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida December 13, 2024 TTL Project No. 240803190.00 page 6 3.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION TTL reviewed (or requested) the following information pertaining to the subject property. 3.1 Title Information TTL requested title information from the client to review whether there may be environmental liens or Activity / Use Limitations (AULs) recorded against the subject property. TTL was not provided this information as part of this Phase I ESA. 3.2 Previous Environmental Assessment Reports TTL was not provided with previous environmental assessments associated with the subject property. 3.3 User Questionnaire ASTM E1527-21 includes a requirement that the User of the Phase I ESA complete a “User Questionnaire.” To qualify for one of the Landowner Liability Protections (LLPs) offered by the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act of 2001 (the “Brownfields Amendments”), the User must provide certain information (if available) to the environmental professional. Failure to provide this information could result in a determination that “all appropriate inquiry” is not complete. The questionnaire is used to determine if the User of the Phase I ESA report has knowledge of contamination issues at the subject property, if the purchase price of the property reflects fair market value, or if the User has knowledge of environmental liens recorded against the subject property. A completed User Questionnaire has not been received as of the date of this report, which constitutes a data gap and is discussed in Section 11.3 of this report. 3.4 Reason for Performing Phase I ESA TTL understands that the client requested this Phase I ESA to assess the potential for environmental concerns associated with property acquisition. 80 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report 7Brew – Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida December 13, 2024 TTL Project No. 240803190.00 page 7 4.0 REGULATORY RECORDS REVIEW TTL engaged Environmental Risk Information Services, Inc. (ERIS) to conduct a search for regulatory information pertaining to the subject property and surrounding properties situated within ASTM- defined approximate minimum search distances (AMSDs) relative to the subject property. A complete copy of ERIS’s findings, which includes a summary of the data sources and dates of database versions utilized, is provided in Appendix B. TTL provided ERIS with the subject property boundary as a reference point to conduct the research. TTL relied on the regulatory records search by ERIS, which was based on information published by State and Federal regulatory agencies and was conducted based on ASTM-established AMSDs. ERIS provided TTL with a map of locations and specific regulatory reports for those facilities that were identified within the prescribed AMSDs. This information was used to evaluate whether the subject property, adjoining facilities, or surrounding facilities within the AMSDs have environmental impacts which might adversely impact the subject property based on information presented in the regulatory database report. The following table includes the listings for the subject property, adjoining facilities, and those surrounding facilities within the AMSD which, based on the nature of the listing, might adversely impact the subject property. Other listings that were included in the ERIS regulatory database report that were determined to not likely impact the subject property based on regulatory status, relative hydrologic location to the subject property, or distance from the subject property are not shown in the table and are not considered environmental concerns to the subject property. 81 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report 7Brew – Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida December 13, 2024 TTL Project No. 240803190.00 page 8 Facility Name and Address Database Listed Distance and Relative Location REC? Basis for Elimination as a REC Comments Re g u l a t o r y St a t u s Di s t a n c e Hy d r o l o g i c Re l a t i o n s h i p Town Center S.E.E.D City of Winter Springs Brownfield Area Subject property No X 7-Eleven Store #34786 / Mobil R/S #1091B 1205 E State Road 434 DWM CONTAM, UST, STCS 639.91ft. NE No X ERIS identified the subject property as being located within the City of Winter Springs Brownfield Area. This brownfield listing is part of a City of Winter Springs and local economic council resolution for an overall “brownfield area” where some sites may or may not be contaminated to help support economic development in the Winter Springs area. Based on review of historical information for the subject property the Town Center S.E.E.D. / City of Winter Springs Brownfield Area listing does not represent a significant environmental concern with respect to the subject property. ERIS identified 7-Eleven Store #34786 / Mobil R/S #1091B 639.91ft. northeast of the subject property on the DWM CONTAM, UST, and STCS databases. TTL reviewed technical files from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection Oculus data viewer concerning the facility. In 1993 an unknown amount of free product was found in a monitoring well on the site. In 2013 a site assessment of the site revealed no soil impacts above the permissible regulatory levels and only one monitoring well location revealed a contaminant detection (benzene) above permissible limits. In March 2020 additional assessment of the site was conducted with soil and groundwater impacts not identified at the site above permissible limits, including two consecutive “clean rounds” from the previous location that revealed the benzene detection above permissible limits. The groundwater monitoring wells were then abandoned for the site. Based on review of regulatory information the 7-Eleven Store #34786 / Mobil R/S #1091B does not represent a REC with respect to the subject property. 82 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report 7Brew – Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida December 13, 2024 TTL Project No. 240803190.00 page 9 5.0 HISTORICAL RECORDS RESEARCH TTL reviewed historical records and documents to gather information pertaining to the historical use and development of the subject property and its surroundings. The findings from this review of reasonably ascertainable resources are summarized in this section. Historical information reviewed as part of this assessment is included in Appendix C. Historical information was obtained from ERIS and from other publicly available sources to ascertain the historical use of the subject property and adjoining properties back to at least 1940 or first development. The historical sources used include the following: Standard Historical Resources Date Range/Source Aerial Photographs 1941-2023 Fire Insurance Maps Unavailable Local Street Directory 1968-2023 Topographic Maps 1962-2021 Building Department Records City of Winter Springs Property Tax/Zoning/Land Use Seminole County Interviews See Section 7.0 Location Historic Summary Subject Property The subject property has been undeveloped land dating back to the early 1940s. North Adjoining The north adjoining properties were undeveloped land until around 2017 when commercial and residential development began. East Adjoining The east adjoining properties were undeveloped until around 2019 when commercial development began. South Adjoining The southern adjoining property has been undeveloped dating back to the early 1940s. West Adjoining The west adjoining properties were undeveloped land until around 2017 when The Savoy Grace Retirement Living development was constructed. 83 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report 7Brew – Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida December 13, 2024 TTL Project No. 240803190.00 page 10 6.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE 6.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions A reconnaissance of the subject property and surrounding area was performed by a TTL Professional on December 2, 2024. TTL completed both a walking reconnaissance of the subject property and a vehicular reconnaissance of an AMSD of one-mile, relative to the subject property, to look for conditions on surrounding sites that may pose an environmental liability relative to the subject property. Selected photographs taken during the site visit are provided in Appendix D. 6.2 General Subject Property Setting The subject property consists of one square-shaped tract consisting of 0.7-acres located southeast of the intersection of Michael Blake Boulevard and East Florida 434 in Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida. The subject property is currently undeveloped land. Surrounding properties consist of multi- family residential development and commercial businesses. 6.3 Building Observations Buildings are not currently located on the subject property. 6.4 Property Observations The subject property is accessed from the northwest adjoining property which is accessed via Michael Blake Boulevard. In its current state the subject property is overgrown grass and tree-covered. The subject property is bounded by undeveloped land to the northwest, northeast, and southeast, with East Florida 434 to the southwest. 6.5 Specific Property Considerations In this section, TTL provides a summary of observations noted during the site reconnaissance on December 2, 2024, as they pertain to specific physical considerations relative to the subject property. 84 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report 7Brew – Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida December 13, 2024 TTL Project No. 240803190.00 page 11 Category Observed Concerns? (Y/N) Comments/Description of Concerns REC? (Y/N) Potable water source N Winter Springs – Public Works & Utilities Sewage disposal system N Winter Springs – Public Works & Utilities Heating/cooling (source) N Hazardous Substances and Petroleum Products N UST/AST N Strong, pungent, or noxious odors Y Drums, totes, and bulk containers N Standing surface water or pools of liquid N Unidentified substance containers N Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB) N Stains or corrosion on floors, walls, ceilings N Drains and sumps N Pits, ponds, and lagoons N Stained soils or pavement N Stressed vegetation N Solid waste N Fill N Stormwater/wastewater N Wells N Septic system/cesspools N 85 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report 7Brew – Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida December 13, 2024 TTL Project No. 240803190.00 page 12 7.0 INTERVIEWS 7.1 Interview with the Representative of the Current Subject Property Owner TTL was not provided with contact information for a representative of the current subject property owner. The lack of an interview with a representative of the current subject property owner constitutes a data gap and is discussed in Section 11.3. 7.2 Interview with Emergency Response Personnel Winter Springs Fire Department – TTL submitted an email incident request on December 5, 2024, to the Winter Springs Fire Department inquiring about any reported incidents relating to hazardous materials, fires, chemical usage or storage at the subject property. A response has not been received as of the date of this report. 7.3 Other Interviews Other interviews were not conducted during this assessment. 86 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report 7Brew – Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida December 13, 2024 TTL Project No. 240803190.00 page 13 8.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS No environmental assessment can preclude the presence of hazardous materials on a site. The conclusions in this report are based on reasonably ascertainable historical information and conditions observed during the site reconnaissance. Future changes in environmental conditions and subject property characteristics/usage may occur with the passage of time, in which case the conclusions in this report may require re-evaluation. This report is intended to assist the client and the client’s legal counsel in evaluating and allocating the environmental risks that may be present with a real estate transaction. However, it is the responsibility of the client and the client’s legal counsel to determine, based on the client’s experience and risk tolerance, whether additional information is required to meet the investigative burdens placed on real estate owners by state and federal agencies. The information and statements made in this report represent the opinions of the environmental professional and are not to be construed as statements of fact. 8.1 Summary of Findings TTL was retained by CEI to perform a Phase I ESA for the property located southeast of the intersection of Michael Blake Boulevard and East Florida 434 in Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida. According to the Seminole County Property Assessment Database, the subject property is a 0.7-acre tract portion of Parcel ID 26-20-30-5AR-0A00-007L (owned by Tuskawilla Retail Partners II, LLC). The subject property is currently undeveloped land. TTL completed a reconnaissance of the subject property on December 2, 2024. The subject property consists of one square-shaped tract consisting of 0.7-acres located southeast of the intersection of Michael Blake Boulevard and East Florida 434 in Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida. The subject property is currently undeveloped land. Surrounding properties consist of multi-family residential development and commercial businesses. The subject property is accessed from the northwest adjoining property which is accesses via Michael Blake Boulevard. In its current state the subject property is overgrown grass and tree-covered. The subject property is bounded by undeveloped land to the northwest, northeast, and southeast, with East Florida 434 to the southwest. Historically, the subject property has been undeveloped land dating back to the early 1940s. Surrounding properties saw an increase in residential and commercial development between 2017 to 2019. 87 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report 7Brew – Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida December 13, 2024 TTL Project No. 240803190.00 page 14 ERIS identified the subject property as being located within the City of Winter Springs Brownfield Area. This brownfield listing is part of a City of Winter Springs and local economic council resolution for an overall “brownfield area” where some sites may or may not be contaminated to help support economic development in the Winter Springs area. Based on review of historical information for the subject property the Town Center S.E.E.D. / City of Winter Springs Brownfield Area listing does not represent a significant environmental concern with respect to the subject property. ERIS identified 7-Eleven Store #34786 / Mobil R/S #1091B 639.91ft. northeast of the subject property on the DWM CONTAM, UST, and STCS databases. TTL reviewed technical files from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection Oculus data viewer concerning the facility. In 1993 an unknown amount of free product was found in a monitoring well on the site. In 2013 a site assessment of the site revealed no soil impacts above the permissible regulatory levels and only one monitoring well location revealed a contaminant detection (benzene) above permissible limits. In March 2020 additional assessment of the site was conducted with soil and groundwater impacts not identified at the site above permissible limits, including two consecutive “clean rounds” from the previous location that revealed the benzene detection above permissible limits. The groundwater monitoring wells were then abandoned for the site. Based on review of regulatory information the 7-Eleven Store #34786 / Mobil R/S #1091B does not represent a REC with respect to the subject property. 8.2 Conclusions TTL has performed this Phase I ESA of the subject property in general conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E1527-21. Exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 11.3 of this report. Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) RECs were not identified by this assessment. Historic Recognized Environmental Conditions (HRECs) HRECs were not identified by this assessment. Controlled Recognized Environmental Conditions (CRECs) CRECs were not identified by this assessment. De Minimis Environmental Conditions De minimis environmental conditions were not identified by this assessment. 88 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report 7Brew – Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida December 13, 2024 TTL Project No. 240803190.00 page 15 Business Environmental Risks This Phase I ESA does not include the assessment of non-scope considerations. Significant Data Gaps Significant data gaps were not identified by this assessment. 89 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report 7Brew – Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida December 13, 2024 TTL Project No. 240803190.00 page 16 9.0 OPINION OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL TTL has performed this Phase I ESA of the subject property in general conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E1527-21. Based on a review of historic/regulatory information, observations during our site reconnaissance, and interviews as part of this assessment, TTL has not identified RECs in connection with the subject property. 90 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report 7Brew – Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida December 13, 2024 TTL Project No. 240803190.00 page 17 10.0 SIGNATURES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS We declare that, to the best of our knowledge and belief, we meet the definition of Environmental Professional, as defined in 312.10 of 40 CFR 312, and have specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. TTL has developed and performed the all-appropriate inquiries in general conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. Résumés of professionals who contributed to this project are provided in Appendix E. ___________________________________________ Zachary Blair Project Geologist ___________________________________________ David B. Carden Environmental Regional Business Unit Leader 91 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report 7Brew – Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida December 13, 2024 TTL Project No. 240803190.00 page 18 11.0 LIMITATIONS 11.1 Purpose This Phase I ESA discusses potential environmental concerns associated with the subject property. TTL also understands that this Phase I ESA was requested to provide due diligence in partial fulfillment of the requirements for securing one of the innocent landowner liability protections that are afforded under CERCLA. The purpose of a Phase I ESA is to convey a professional opinion regarding whether past or present, on-site or off-site activities have caused or could potentially cause a release of hazardous substances or petroleum products into the soils, groundwater, or surface water of the subject property (recognized environmental conditions – as defined below). TTL’s professional opinion stated herein is based on a review of readily available information, including historical resources, subject property and vicinity observations, and interviews with knowledgeable persons, as well as TTL’s experience with similar projects. The ASTM E1527-21 Standard defines a “recognized environmental condition” (REC) as: “(1) the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on or at the subject property due to a release to the environment; (2) the likely presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at the subject property due to a release or likely release to the environment; or (3) the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at the subject property under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment.” The ASTM E1527-21 Standard defines a “historic recognized environmental condition” (HREC) as: “a previous release of hazardous substances or petroleum products affecting the subject property that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or authorities and meeting unrestricted use criteria established by the applicable regulatory authority or authorities without subjecting the subject property to any controls.” The ASTM E1527-21 Standard has also introduced the term “controlled recognized environmental condition” (CREC) which is defined as: 92 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report 7Brew – Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida December 13, 2024 TTL Project No. 240803190.00 page 19 “a recognized environmental condition affecting the subject property that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or authorities with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls.” 11.2 Scope of Services This Phase I ESA was performed in general accordance with the scope of accepted standard practices as defined by the ASTM E1527-21 Standard and included the following tasks: • An evaluation of the subject property’s physical setting characteristics, including a review of published topographic maps (as they are readily available) and area observations to characterize the subject property's drainage. • A review of historical documents, maps, aerial photographs, and tax records to evaluate present and past subject property/vicinity land uses. These historical resources were obtained from sources considered both readily available and reasonably ascertainable per the ASTM standard. Reasonable attempts were made to fill any identified data gaps. • A review of environmental lists published by state, federal, and tribal agencies to assess whether the subject property or nearby properties are listed as having present or past environmental problems, are under investigation, or are regulated by state, federal, or tribal environmental regulatory agencies. Federal and state institutional and/or engineering control registries (as they are available) were also reviewed to determine Activity or Use Limitations (AULs) for the subject property. • A walking/driving site and vicinity reconnaissance to look for obvious indications of present or past activities, such as waste handling, solid waste disposal, hazardous materials usage, wastewater treatment, discharge, or disposal, or the presence of underground/aboveground storage tanks (UST/AST), which have or could have contaminated the subject property. • Interviews with people knowledgeable of the property’s history, including the current property owner and emergency management personnel, to inquire about known possible environmental issues at the subject property. Preparation of this Phase I ESA report presenting findings, conclusions, and recommendations. The report is signed by an Environmental Professional, as defined by the ASTM E1527-21 Standard. 93 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report 7Brew – Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida December 13, 2024 TTL Project No. 240803190.00 page 20 11.3 Project Limitations/Data Gaps Conclusions were drawn from conditions observed during the site visit and reconnaissance of the subject property. Because the environmental conditions of the subject property may change with the passage of time, TTL acknowledges that the information presented in this Phase I ESA report reflects only the conditions encountered or observed at the time of the site visit. We assume that information provided to us by others is given in good faith, but we cannot confirm the reports and anecdotal comments offered to us by the individuals interviewed. No environmental assessment can absolutely preclude the presence of petroleum products or hazardous substances on a subject property. The conclusions in this report are based on reasonably ascertainable historical site information, conditions observed during our site visit, and reconnaissance of the subject property and the surrounding area. This is inherently a time-based report, future changes in environmental conditions and site characteristics/usage may occur with the passage of time which would potentially impact the environmental condition of the property beyond what was observed in this report. This report is designed to provide information to be used by the client in evaluating and allocating potential environmental risks that may potentially be present within a property. It is the responsibility of the client and the client’s legal counsel to determine, based on the client’s experience, whether additional information is required to meet the investigative burdens placed on real estate owners by state or federal agency. Several data gaps have been encountered during this assessment which are described below. • The User did not complete the ASTM User Questionnaire and provide to TTL. TTL assumes that qualification for the Landowner Liability Protections (LLPs) is being established by the User in documentation outside of this investigation. As a result, TTL does not view the lack of client- provided information as a significant data gap. • TTL was not provided with contact information for a representative of the current subject property owner. TTL does not view the lack of an interview with a representative of the current subject property owner as a significant data gap. 94 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report 7Brew – Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida December 13, 2024 TTL Project No. 240803190.00 page 21 11.4 Non-Scope Considerations Pursuant to the ASTM E1527-21 Standard, this Phase I ESA does not address non-scope considerations such as, but not limited to, asbestos-containing building materials, radon, lead-based paint, lead in drinking water, wetlands, cultural resources, endangered species, indoor air quality and mold. In addition, this Phase I ESA did not include sampling and/or analysis of soils, subsurface water or building materials. This Phase I ESA does not provide for an in-depth review of the past uses of properties surrounding the subject property and is not performed to determine their compliance with environmental regulations. 11.5 Special Terms and Conditions The findings and opinions presented are relative to the dates of TTL’s site reconnaissance and should not be relied on to represent conditions at later dates. The opinions included herein are based on information obtained during this study and TTL’s experience. If additional information becomes available which might impact TTL’s environmental conclusions, we request the opportunity to review the information, reassess the potential concerns, and modify our opinions, if warranted. Although this assessment has attempted to identify the potential for environmental impacts to the subject property, potential sources of contamination may have escaped detection due to: (1) the limited scope of this assessment; (2) the inaccuracy of public records; (3) the presence of undetected or unreported environmental incidents; (4) buried waste or debris; and (5) deliberate concealment of information. According to the ASTM E1527-21 Standard, no Phase I ESA can wholly eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for RECs in connection with a property. Therefore, with recognition to reasonable limits of time and costs, performance of this Phase I ESA is intended to reduce, but cannot eliminate, uncertainty regarding the potential for RECs in connection with the subject property. The purpose of this Phase I ESA is not to determine the actual presence, degree, or extent of contamination. Such a determination would require additional exploratory work, including sampling and laboratory analysis. 11.6 User Reliance This assessment has been prepared for the sole use of CEI. No other individual, party, or entity may rely on this Phase I ESA without having received expressed written permission from TTL. Upon approval by CEI, reliance will be extended, at TTL’s option, to other parties material to a property transaction with such reliance being conditional upon that party’s acceptance of the terms, conditions and liability 95 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report 7Brew – Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida December 13, 2024 TTL Project No. 240803190.00 page 22 limitations stated in TTL’s client agreement and payment of a fee. Information received by any other third parties is not for reliance unless TTL first receives a signed Secondary Client Agreement and a completed User Questionnaire Form from the third party. 96 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report 7Brew – Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida December 13, 2024 TTL Project No. 240803190.00 page 23 12.0 REFERENCES ASTM “Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessments Process,” ASTM Designation E1527-21, Published November 2021. ERIS, Aerial Photographs, Order Number 24112100943, dated November 25, 2024. ERIS, Database Report, Order Number 24112100943, dated November 25, 2024. ERIS, Fire Insurance Maps, Order Number 24112100943, dated November 25, 2024. ERIS, Local Street Directories, Order 24112100943, dated December 2, 2024. ERIS, Physical Settings Report, Order Number 24112100943, dated November 25, 2024. ERIS, Topographic Maps, Order Number 24112100943, dated November 25, 2024. U.S. Geological Survey, Topographic Map, Casselberry, Florida 7.5-minute quadrangle. 97 APPENDIX A SITE LOCATION MAP & SITE AERIAL MAP 98 Ca s s e l b e r r y Ov i e d o 37 37 38 38 42 39 38 30 37 CHECKED BY: ZB DRAWING DATE: 12/6/2024 REVISION DATE: N/A SCALE: 1" = 2,000' TTL JOB NO.: 000240803190.00 DRAWN BY: KEL Service Layer Credits: USGSTopo: USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP Elevation Program, Geographic Names Information System, National Hydrography Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset, and National Transportation Dataset; USGS Global Ecosystems; U.S. Census Bureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Road data; Natural Earth Data; U.S. Department of State HIU; NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information. Data refreshed April, 2024. CEI ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. 7BREW (WINTER PARK, FL) PHASE I - ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT (ESA) WINTER SPRINGS, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA ),*85(6,7(/2&$7,21 7232*5$3+,& . Site Located Within:(-81.26°, 28.69°) 21S 31E Section 38 U.S. Geological Survey 1:24,000 Topographic Quadrangle Map Casselberry, FL. 2024 (50-ft Contour Interval) LEGEND Subject Propery (0.7± AC) )/25,'$&2817,(6 6(0,12/(&2 99 S e a H a w k C v The Blake - 111 Wendy's BraveWolf Pt W o o d e d V in e D r N W inter P a r kDr E S t a t e R o a d 4 3 4 E S t a t e R o a d 4 3 4 S e a H a w k C v The Blake - 101 The Blake - 1501 The Blake - 151 The Blake - 251 419 419 Mich a e l B l ake Blvd M i c h a e l B l a k e B l v d Diam ond Dov e Cv E S t a t e R o a d 4 3 4 E S t a t e R o a d 4 3 4 ReVidential 7heSavo\*racioXV Retirement/ivinJ ReVidential 8ndeveloSed CHECKED BY: ZB DRAWING DATE: 12/6/2024 REVISION DATE: N/A PROJECT #: 000240803190.00 DRAWN BY: KEL Service Layer Credits: Hybrid Reference Layer: Sources: Esri, TomTom, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community World Imagery (Firefly): Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community . CEI ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. 7BREW (WINTER PARK, FL) PHASE I - ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT (ESA) WINTER SPRINGS, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA Image Source:State of Florida 11/19/2023 LEGEND Subject Propery (0.7± AC) FIGURE 2: SITE LOCATION (AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH) SCALE: 1" = 200'100 APPENDIX B REGULATORY RECORDS INFORMATION 101 Project Property:7Brew - Winter Springs Michael Blake Boulevard Winter Springs FL 32708 Project No:240803190.00 Report Type:Database Report Order No: 24112100943 Requested by:TTL, Inc. Date Completed: November 25, 2024 102 2 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 h-Table of Contents Notice:IMPORTANT LIMITATIONS and YOUR LIABILITY Reliance on information in Report:This report DOES NOT replace a full Phase I Environmental Site Assessment but is solely intended to be used as database review of environmental records. License for use of information in Report:No page of this report can be used without this cover page, this notice and the project property identifier. The information in Report(s) may not be modified or re-sold. Your Liability for misuse:Using this Service and/or its reports in a manner contrary to this Notice or your agreement will be in breach of copyright and contract and ERIS may obtain damages for such mis-use, including damages caused to third parties, and gives ERIS the right to terminate your account, rescind your license to any previous reports and to bar you from future use of the Service. No warranty of Accuracy or Liability for ERIS:The information contained in this report has been produced by ERIS Information Inc. ("ERIS") using various sources of information, including information provided by Federal and State government departments. The report applies only to the address and up to the date specified on the cover of this report, and any alterations or deviation from this description will require a new report. This report and the data contained herein does not purport to be and does not constitute a guarantee of the accuracy of the information contained herein and does not constitute a legal opinion nor medical advice. Although ERIS has endeavored to present you with information that is accurate, ERIS disclaims, any and all liability for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in such information and data, whether attributable to inadvertence, negligence or otherwise, and for any consequences arising therefrom. Liability on the part of ERIS is limited to the monetary value paid for this report. Trademark and Copyright:You may not use the ERIS trademarks or attribute any work to ERIS other than as outlined above. This Service and Report (s) are protected by copyright owned by ERIS Information Inc. Copyright in data used in the Service or Report(s) (the "Data") is owned by ERIS or its licensors. The Service, Report(s) and Data may not be copied or reproduced in whole or in any substantial part without prior written consent of ERIS. Table of Contents Table of Contents...........................................................................................2 Executive Summary........................................................................................3 Executive Summary: Report Summary.......................................................................................................................4 Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Project Property...................................................................................9 Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Surrounding Properties......................................................................10 Executive Summary: Summary by Data Source.......................................................................................................15 Map...............................................................................................................22 Aerial.............................................................................................................25 Topographic Map..........................................................................................26 Detail Report.................................................................................................27 Unplottable Summary...................................................................................85 Unplottable Report........................................................................................86 Appendix: Database Descriptions.................................................................87 Definitions...................................................................................................103 103 3 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 h-Executive Summary Property Information: Project Property:7Brew - Winter Springs Michael Blake Boulevard Winter Springs FL 32708 Project No:240803190.00 Coordinates: Latitude:28.69450929 Longitude:-81.25897858 UTM Northing:3,174,168.08 UTM Easting:474,701.65 UTM Zone:UTM Zone 17R Elevation:29 FT Order Information: Order No:24112100943 Date Requested:November 21, 2024 Requested by:TTL, Inc. Report Type:Database Report Historicals/Products: Aerial Photographs Historical Aerials (with Project Boundaries) City Directory Search CD - 2 Street Search ERIS Xplorer ERIS Xplorer Excel Add-On Excel Add-On Fire Insurance Maps US Fire Insurance Maps Physical Setting Report (PSR) Physical Setting Report (PSR) Topographic Map Topographic Maps Vapor Screening Tool Vapor Screening Tool Executive Summary 104 4 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 h-Executive Summary: Report Summary Database Searched Search Radius Project Property Within 0.12mi 0.125mi to 0.25mi 0.25mi to 0.50mi 0.50mi to 1.00mi Total Standard Environmental Records Federal rr-NPL-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-PROPOSED NPL-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-DELETED NPL-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-SEMS-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-ODI-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-SEMS ARCHIVE-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-CERCLIS-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-IODI-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-CERCLIS NFRAP-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-CERCLIS LIENS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-RCRA CORRACTS-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-RCRA TSD-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-RCRA LQG-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-RCRA SQG-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-RCRA VSQG-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-RCRA NON GEN-aa Y 0.25 0 1 4 -- 5 rr-RCRA CONTROLS-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-FED ENG-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-FED INST-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-LUCIS-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-NPL IC-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-ERNS 1982 TO 1986-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-ERNS 1987 TO 1989-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-ERNS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-FED BROWNFIELDS-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-FEMA UST-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-FRP-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 NPL PROPOSED NPL DELETED NPL SEMS ODI SEMS ARCHIVE CERCLIS IODI CERCLIS NFRAP CERCLIS LIENS RCRA CORRACTS RCRA TSD RCRA LQG RCRA SQG RCRA VSQG RCRA NON GEN RCRA CONTROLS FED ENG FED INST LUCIS NPL IC ERNS 1982 TO 1986 ERNS 1987 TO 1989 ERNS FED BROWNFIELDS FEMA UST FRP Executive Summary: Report Summary 105 5 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Database Searched Search Radius Project Property Within 0.12mi 0.125mi to 0.25mi 0.25mi to 0.50mi 0.50mi to 1.00mi Total rr-DELISTED FRP-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-HIST GAS STATIONS-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-REFN-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-BULK TERMINAL-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-SEMS LIEN-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-SUPERFUND ROD-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-DOE FUSRAP-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 State rr-SHWS-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-DELISTED SHWS-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-ERIC-aa Y 1 0 1 2 0 0 3 rr-CLEANUP DEP-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-WCRPS-aa Y 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 rr-DELISTED WCP-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-SWF/LF-aa Y 0.5 0 0 1 1 - 2 rr-LST-aa Y 0.5 0 1 2 0 - 3 rr-DELISTED LST-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-UST-aa Y 0.25 0 1 2 -- 3 rr-AST-aa Y 0.25 0 1 1 -- 2 rr-TANK-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-DEL UST AST TANK-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-DEL STORAGE TANK-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-FF TANKS-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-STCS-aa Y 0.5 0 2 2 2 - 6 rr-INST-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 1 - 1 rr-ENG-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 1 - 1 rr-VCP-aa Y 0.5 0 0 4 0 - 4 rr-BROWNFIELDS-aa Y 0.5 0 0 1 0 - 1 rr-BROWNFIELD AREA-aa Y 0.5 1 0 1 0 - 2 rr-HAZ WASTE FAC-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Tribal rr-INDIAN LUST-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-INDIAN UST-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-DELISTED INDIAN LST-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 DELISTED FRP HIST GAS STATIONS REFN BULK TERMINAL SEMS LIEN SUPERFUND ROD DOE FUSRAP SHWS DELISTED SHWS ERIC CLEANUP DEP WCRPS DELISTED WCP SWF/LF LST DELISTED LST UST AST TANK DEL UST AST TANK DEL STORAGE TANK FF TANKS STCS INST ENG VCP BROWNFIELDS BROWNFIELD AREA HAZ WASTE FAC INDIAN LUST INDIAN UST DELISTED INDIAN LST 106 6 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Database Searched Search Radius Project Property Within 0.12mi 0.125mi to 0.25mi 0.25mi to 0.50mi 0.50mi to 1.00mi Total rr-DELISTED INDIAN UST-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 County No County databases were selected to be included in the search. Additional Environmental Records Federal rr-PFAS GHG-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-OSC RESPONSE-aa Y 0.125 0 0 --- 0 rr-FINDS/FRS-aa Y PO 0 2 --- 2 rr-TRIS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-PFAS NPL-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-PFAS FED SITES-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-PFAS SSEHRI-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-PFAS ERNS-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-PFAS NPDES-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-PFAS TRI-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-PFAS WATER-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-PFAS TSCA-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-PFAS E-MANIFEST-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-PFAS IND-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-HMIRS-aa Y 0.125 0 1 --- 1 rr-NCDL-aa Y 0.125 0 0 --- 0 rr-TSCA-aa Y 0.125 0 0 --- 0 rr-HIST TSCA-aa Y 0.125 0 0 --- 0 rr-FTTS ADMIN-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-FTTS INSP-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-PRP-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-SCRD DRYCLEANER-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-ICIS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-FED DRYCLEANERS-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-DELISTED FED DRY-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-FUDS-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-FUDS MRS-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-FORMER NIKE-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-PIPELINE INCIDENT-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-MLTS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 DELISTED INDIAN UST PFAS GHG OSC RESPONSE FINDS/FRS TRIS PFAS NPL PFAS FED SITES PFAS SSEHRI PFAS ERNS PFAS NPDES PFAS TRI PFAS WATER PFAS TSCA PFAS E-MANIFEST PFAS IND HMIRS NCDL TSCA HIST TSCA FTTS ADMIN FTTS INSP PRP SCRD DRYCLEANER ICIS FED DRYCLEANERS DELISTED FED DRY FUDS FUDS MRS FORMER NIKE PIPELINE INCIDENT MLTS 107 7 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Database Searched Search Radius Project Property Within 0.12mi 0.125mi to 0.25mi 0.25mi to 0.50mi 0.50mi to 1.00mi Total rr-HIST MLTS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-MINES-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-SMCRA-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-MRDS-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 rr-LM SITES-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-ALT FUELS-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-CONSENT DECREES-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-AFS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-SSTS-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-PCBT-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-PCB-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-POWER PLANTS-aa Y 0.125 0 0 --- 0 State rr-HIST RISK-aa Y 0.125 0 0 --- 0 rr-PRIORITYCLEAN-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-DRYCLEANERS-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-DELISTED DRYCLEANERS-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-HISTORICAL DRYC-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-SPILLS-aa Y 0.125 0 0 --- 0 rr-DWM CONTAM-aa Y 0.5 0 3 5 0 - 8 rr-DEL CONTAM SITE-aa Y 0.5 0 0 1 0 - 1 rr-PFAS AFFF-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-PFAS-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-GW CONTAM-aa Y 0.125 0 0 --- 0 rr-UIC-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-WELL SURVEILLANCE-aa Y 0.25 0 1 4 -- 5 rr-CDV SOUTHEAST-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-TIER 2-aa Y 0.125 0 0 --- 0 rr-DELISTED COUNTY-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 Tribal No Tribal additional environmental record sources available for this State. County No County additional environmental databases were selected to be included in the search. HIST MLTS MINES SMCRA MRDS LM SITES ALT FUELS CONSENT DECREES AFS SSTS PCBT PCB POWER PLANTS HIST RISK PRIORITYCLEAN DRYCLEANERS DELISTED DRYCLEANERS HISTORICAL DRYC SPILLS DWM CONTAM DEL CONTAM SITE PFAS AFFF PFAS GW CONTAM UIC WELL SURVEILLANCE CDV SOUTHEAST TIER 2 DELISTED COUNTY 108 8 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Database Searched Search Radius Project Property Within 0.12mi 0.125mi to 0.25mi 0.25mi to 0.50mi 0.50mi to 1.00mi Total Total:1 15 30 5 1 52 * PO – Property Only * 'Property and adjoining properties' database search radii are set at 0.25 miles. 109 9 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 h-Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Project Property Map Key DB Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev Diff (ft) Page Number m1d dd-BROWNFIELD AREA-821735648-aa TOWN CENTER S.E.E.D. / BROWNFIELD CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS FL ENE 0.00 / 0.00 0 p1p-27-821735648-x1x 271BROWNFIELD AREA Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Project Property 110 10 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 h-Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Surrounding Properties Map Key DB Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev Diff (ft) Page Number m2d dd-FINDS/FRS-916891975-aa SEMINOLE CROSSING UNKNOWN WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 N 0.01 / 48.73 1 p1p-27-916891975-x1x Registry ID: 110070882674 m3d dd-FINDS/FRS-815944806-aa MICHAEL BLAKE BOULEVARD UNKNOWN WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 WNW 0.01 / 55.84 10 p1p-28-815944806-x1x Registry ID: 110045481929 m4d dd-AST-894393874-aa WINTER SPRINGS CITY - LIFT STATION 80 MICHAEL BLAKE BLVD WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 SW 0.06 / 312.76 4 p1p-28-894393874-x1x Facility ID | Facility Status: 9818667 | OPEN Tank Status | Content Code: U - IN SERVICE | G m4d dd-STCS-896329468-aa WINTER SPRINGS CITY - LIFT STATION 80 MICHAEL BLAKE BLVD WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 SW 0.06 / 312.76 4 p1p-29-896329468-x1x Facility ID | Fac Stat (OD): 9818667 | OPEN m5d dd-WCRPS-867335530-aa SCRIMSHER PARCEL E SR 434 WINTER SPRINGS, FL WSW 0.09 / 451.47 12 p1p-31-867335530-x1x m5d dd-ERIC-894782037-aa SCRIMISHER PARCEL E SR 434 WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708 WSW 0.09 / 451.47 12 p1p-32-894782037-x1x m6d dd-RCRA NON GEN-810078951-aa MOBIL OIL CORP SS #Q8M 1205 E SR 434 WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 WNW 0.12 / 639.91 14 p1p-32-810078951-x1x EPA Handler ID: FLD984205518 m6d dd-UST-813498473-aa MOBIL-WINTER SPRINGS #731 1205 E STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 WNW 0.12 / 639.91 14 p1p-34-813498473-x1x Facility ID | Facility Status: 9045623 | OPEN Tank Status | Status Date: U - IN SERVICE | 01-OCT-2008, B - REMOVED FROM SITE | 01-OCT- 2008, B - REMOVED FROM SITE | 01-OCT-2008, B - REMOVED FROM SITE | 01-OCT-2008, U - IN SERVICE | 01-OCT-2008, B - REMOVED FROM SITE | 01-OCT-2008 m6d dd-LST-813546516-aa MOBIL-WINTER SPRINGS #731 1205 E STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708- 2811 WNW 0.12 / 639.91 14 p1p-37-813546516-x1x Facility ID | Facility Status: 9045623 | OPEN Cleanup Required: R - CLEANUP REQUIRED m6d dd-WELL SURVEILLANCE-866254304-aa MOBIL RS #10918 1205 W HWY 434 WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 WNW 0.12 / 639.91 14 p1p-40-866254304-x1x m6d dd-DWM CONTAM-874792639-aa MOBIL-WINTER SPRINGS #731 1205 E STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 WNW 0.12 / 639.91 14 p1p-40-874792639-x1x Facility ID: 9045623 m6d dd-DWM CONTAM-874811642-aa MOBIL R/S #10918 1205 E STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 WNW 0.12 / 639.91 14 p1p-41-874811642-x1x 27 28 28 29 31 32 32 34 37 40 40 41 2 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 FINDS/FRS FINDS/FRS AST STCS WCRPS ERIC RCRA NON GEN UST LST WELL SURVEILLANCE DWM CONTAM DWM CONTAM Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Surrounding Properties 111 11 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key DB Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev Diff (ft) Page Number Facility ID: 9045623 Facility Status: ACTIVE m6d dd-DWM CONTAM-874820254-aa 7-ELEVEN STORE #34786 1205 E STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 WNW 0.12 / 639.91 14 p1p-42-874820254-x1x Facility ID: 9045623 Facility Status: ACTIVE m6d dd-HMIRS-880634269-aa 1205 STATE ROAD 434 EAST WINTER SPRINGS FL WNW 0.12 / 639.91 14 p1p-42-880634269-x1x m6d dd-STCS-896360544-aa MOBIL-WINTER SPRINGS #731 1205 E STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 WNW 0.12 / 639.91 14 p1p-44-896360544-x1x Facility ID | Fac Stat (OD): 9045623 | OPEN m7d dd-RCRA NON GEN-810068856-aa FOREIGN CAR PARTS SERVICE 1207 E STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708- 2811 WNW 0.14 / 720.71 14 p1p-47-810068856-x1x EPA Handler ID: FLD981748007 m8d dd-SWF/LF-813519909-aa 1212 E. SR 434 DEBRIS STAGING AREA 1212 E. SR 434 WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 NW 0.14 / 744.06 13 p1p-48-813519909-x1x m9d dd-RCRA NON GEN-810067622-aa CENTRAL FLORIDA DRUM INC 2950 RAILROAD AVE OVIEDO FL 32765 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 10 p1p-49-810067622-x1x EPA Handler ID: FLD032630212 m9d dd-RCRA NON GEN-810074318-aa POLYMETRICS INC 2950 RAILROAD AVE OVIEDO FL 32794 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 10 p1p-51-810074318-x1x EPA Handler ID: FLD984183426 m9d dd-LST-813542035-aa L D PLANTE INC 2950 RAILROAD AVE OVIEDO FL 32765-8240 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 10 p1p-53-813542035-x1x Facility ID | Facility Status: 8520795 | CLOSED Cleanup Required: R - CLEANUP REQUIRED m9d dd-VCP-813587799-aa L D PLANTE (BF)2950 RAILROAD AVE - OVIEDO FL - SSW 0.17 / 887.66 10 p1p-56-813587799-x1x m9d dd-WELL SURVEILLANCE-866248913-aa PLANTE 2950 RAILROAD AVE WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 10 p1p-56-866248913-x1x m9d dd-WELL SURVEILLANCE-866249010-aa L D PLANTE INC 2950 RAILROAD AVE WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 10 p1p-56-866249010-x1x m9d dd-WELL SURVEILLANCE-866259446-aa LD PLANTE 2950 RAILROAD AVE OVIEDO FL 32708 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 10 p1p-56-866259446-x1x m9d dd-DWM CONTAM-874806319-aa L D PLANTE (BF)2950 RAILROAD AVE OVIEDO FL SSW 0.17 / 887.66 10 p1p-57-874806319-x1x 42 42 44 47 48 49 51 53 56 56 56 56 57 6 6 6 7 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 DWM CONTAM HMIRS STCS RCRA NON GEN SWF/LF RCRA NON GEN RCRA NON GEN LST VCP WELL SURVEILLANCE WELL SURVEILLANCE WELL SURVEILLANCE DWM CONTAM 112 12 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key DB Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev Diff (ft) Page Number Facility ID: 38428 m9d dd-UST-894358911-aa L D PLANTE INC 2950 RAILROAD AVE OVIEDO FL 32765 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 10 p1p-58-894358911-x1x Facility ID | Facility Status: 8520795 | CLOSED Tank Status | Status Date: B - REMOVED FROM SITE | 31-DEC-1988, B - REMOVED FROM SITE | 31-DEC-1988 m9d dd-AST-894396012-aa L D PLANTE INC 2950 RAILROAD AVE OVIEDO FL 32765 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 10 p1p-58-894396012-x1x Facility ID | Facility Status: 8520795 | CLOSED Tank Status | Content Code: B - REMOVED FROM SITE | D, B - REMOVED FROM SITE | D m9d dd-ERIC-894771195-aa Polymetrics Inc 2950 RAILROAD AVE OVIEDO FL 0 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 10 p1p-59-894771195-x1x m9d dd-ERIC-894773183-aa L D PLANTE INC 2950 RAILROAD AVENUE OVIEDO FL 32765 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 10 p1p-60-894773183-x1x m9d dd-DWM CONTAM-895374564-aa L.D.PLANTE 2950 RAILROAD AVENUE OVIEDO FL SSW 0.17 / 887.66 10 p1p-60-895374564-x1x m9d dd-STCS-896316434-aa L D PLANTE INC 2950 RAILROAD AVE OVIEDO FL 32765 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 10 p1p-61-896316434-x1x Facility ID | Fac Stat (OD): 8520795 | CLOSED m9d dd-VCP-902433393-aa L D PLANTE (BF)2950 RAILROAD AVE - OVIEDO FL - SSW 0.17 / 887.66 10 p1p-63-902433393-x1x m9d dd-DWM CONTAM-902949434-aa L D PLANTE INC 2950 RAILROAD AVE OVIEDO FL 32765 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 10 p1p-64-902949434-x1x Facility ID: 8520795 m9d dd-VCP-923853834-aa L D PLANTE (BF)2950 RAILROAD AVE - OVIEDO FL - SSW 0.17 / 887.66 10 p1p-64-923853834-x1x m9d dd-VCP-923854179-aa L D PLANTE (BF)2950 RAILROAD AVE - OVIEDO FL - SSW 0.17 / 887.66 10 p1p-65-923854179-x1x m10d dd-BROWNFIELDS-813588067-aa Former Central Florida Drum Facility 2950 (M-1 Zoning Area Only) and 2960 Railroad Avenue WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 10 p1p-65-813588067-x1x m11d dd-BROWNFIELD AREA-821735646-aa Former Central Florida Drum Facility WINTER SPRINGS FL SSW 0.17 / 887.66 10 p1p-65-821735646-x1x m12d dd-LST-813540753-aa HANDY WAY FOOD STORE #3333 170 TUSCAWILLA RD WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708- 3715 WNW 0.23 / 1,208.67 16 p1p-66-813540753-x1x 58 58 59 60 60 61 63 64 64 65 65 65 66 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 10 11 12 UST AST ERIC ERIC DWM CONTAM STCS VCP DWM CONTAM VCP VCP BROWNFIELDS BROWNFIELD AREA LST 113 13 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key DB Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev Diff (ft) Page Number Facility ID | Facility Status: 8516641 | CLOSED Cleanup Required: R - CLEANUP REQUIRED, R - CLEANUP REQUIRED m12d dd-DEL CONTAM SITE-822758487-aa HANDY WAY FOOD STORE #3333 170 TUSCAWILLA RD WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 WNW 0.23 / 1,208.67 16 p1p-70-822758487-x1x m12d dd-WELL SURVEILLANCE-866244026-aa HANDYWAY 170 TUSKAWILLA RD WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 WNW 0.23 / 1,208.67 16 p1p-70-866244026-x1x m12d dd-DWM CONTAM-874809453-aa HANDY WAY FOOD STORE #3333 170 TUSCAWILLA RD WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 WNW 0.23 / 1,208.67 16 p1p-70-874809453-x1x Facility ID: 8516641 Facility Status: ACTIVE m12d dd-UST-894361060-aa HANDY WAY FOOD STORE #3333 170 TUSCAWILLA RD WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 WNW 0.23 / 1,208.67 16 p1p-71-894361060-x1x Facility ID | Facility Status: 8516641 | CLOSED Tank Status | Status Date: B - REMOVED FROM SITE | 27-MAR-1995, B - REMOVED FROM SITE | 01-JUL-2000, B - REMOVED FROM SITE | 27-MAR-1995, B - REMOVED FROM SITE | 01- JUL-2000, B - REMOVED FROM SITE | 27-MAR-1995 m12d dd-STCS-896357211-aa HANDY WAY FOOD STORE #3333 170 TUSCAWILLA RD WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 WNW 0.23 / 1,208.67 16 p1p-72-896357211-x1x Facility ID | Fac Stat (OD): 8516641 | CLOSED m12d dd-DWM CONTAM-902948121-aa HANDY WAY FOOD STORE #3333 170 TUSCAWILLA RD WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 WNW 0.23 / 1,208.67 16 p1p-75-902948121-x1x Facility ID: 8516641 m13d dd-RCRA NON GEN-810090068-aa HI FLAVOR MEATS 315 TUSKAWILLA RD WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708- 3710 WSW 0.23 / 1,216.74 12 p1p-75-810090068-x1x EPA Handler ID: FLR000057604 m14d dd-INST-873504236-aa L D PLANTE INC 2950 RAILROAD AVENUE OVIEDO FL 32765 SSW 0.26 / 1,352.18 14 p1p-77-873504236-x1x m14d dd-ENG-893501142-aa L D PLANTE INC 2950 RAILROAD AVENUE OVIEDO FL 32765 SSW 0.26 / 1,352.18 14 p1p-78-893501142-x1x m15d dd-STCS-896309477-aa HI-FLAVOR MEATS INC 401 TUSKAWILLA RD WINTER SPRINGS FL 32308 WSW 0.30 / 1,567.39 12 p1p-79-896309477-x1x Facility ID | Fac Stat (OD): 8520784 | CLOSED m16d dd-SWF/LF-867434614-aa TUSKAWILLA CROSSINGS DISASTER DEBRIS MANAGEMENT SITE 395 TUSKAWILLA RD WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 SW 0.41 / 2,164.61 18 p1p-80-867434614-x1x m17d dd-STCS-896359442-aa PUBLIX SUPER MARKET #62 1160 E SR 434 WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 NW 0.42 / 2,206.15 17 p1p-81-896359442-x1x Facility ID | Fac Stat (OD): 9809815 | OPEN 70 70 70 71 72 75 75 77 78 79 80 81 12 12 12 12 12 12 13 14 14 15 16 17 DEL CONTAM SITE WELL SURVEILLANCE DWM CONTAM UST STCS DWM CONTAM RCRA NON GEN INST ENG STCS SWF/LF STCS 114 14 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key DB Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev Diff (ft) Page Number m18d dd-MRDS-888585637-aa SULLIVAN MATERIALS - TUSCAWILLA UNITS SEMINOLE COUNTY WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 ESE 0.74 / 3,926.72 -14 p1p-83-888585637-x1x Dep ID: 10306524 8318MRDS 115 15 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 h-Executive Summary: Summary by Data Source Standard Federal RCRA NON GEN - RCRA Non-Generators A search of the RCRA NON GEN database, dated Apr 8, 2024 has found that there are 5 RCRA NON GEN site(s) within approximately 0.25miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key MOBIL OIL CORP SS #Q8M 1205 E SR 434 WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 WNW 0.12 / 639.91 m-6-810078951-a EPA Handler ID: FLD984205518 FOREIGN CAR PARTS SERVICE 1207 E STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708-2811 WNW 0.14 / 720.71 m-7-810068856-a EPA Handler ID: FLD981748007 CENTRAL FLORIDA DRUM INC 2950 RAILROAD AVE OVIEDO FL 32765 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 m-9-810067622-a EPA Handler ID: FLD032630212 POLYMETRICS INC 2950 RAILROAD AVE OVIEDO FL 32794 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 m-9-810074318-a EPA Handler ID: FLD984183426 HI FLAVOR MEATS 315 TUSKAWILLA RD WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708-3710 WSW 0.23 / 1,216.74 m-13-810090068-a EPA Handler ID: FLR000057604 State ERIC - ERIC Waste Cleanup A search of the ERIC database, dated Sep 13, 2024 has found that there are 3 ERIC site(s) within approximately 1.00miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key SCRIMISHER PARCEL E SR 434 WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708 WSW 0.09 / 451.47 m-5-894782037-a L D PLANTE INC 2950 RAILROAD AVENUE OVIEDO FL 32765 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 m-9-894773183-a Polymetrics Inc 2950 RAILROAD AVE OVIEDO FL 0 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 m-9-894771195-a 6 7 9 9 13 5 9 9 Executive Summary: Summary by Data Source 116 16 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key WCRPS - Waste Cleanup Responsible Party Sites A search of the WCRPS database, dated Apr 11, 2021 has found that there are 1 WCRPS site(s) within approximately 1.00miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key SCRIMSHER PARCEL E SR 434 WINTER SPRINGS, FL WSW 0.09 / 451.47 m-5-867335530-a SWF/LF - Solid Waste Facilities and Landfills A search of the SWF/LF database, dated Jun 12, 2024 has found that there are 2 SWF/LF site(s) within approximately 0.50miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key 1212 E. SR 434 DEBRIS STAGING AREA 1212 E. SR 434 WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 NW 0.14 / 744.06 m-8-813519909-a TUSKAWILLA CROSSINGS DISASTER DEBRIS MANAGEMENT SITE 395 TUSKAWILLA RD WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 SW 0.41 / 2,164.61 m-16-867434614-a LST - Leaking Tanks A search of the LST database, dated Apr 22, 2024 has found that there are 3 LST site(s) within approximately 0.50miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key MOBIL-WINTER SPRINGS #731 1205 E STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708-2811 WNW 0.12 / 639.91 m-6-813546516-a Facility ID | Facility Status: 9045623 | OPEN Cleanup Required: R - CLEANUP REQUIRED L D PLANTE INC 2950 RAILROAD AVE OVIEDO FL 32765-8240 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 m-9-813542035-a Facility ID | Facility Status: 8520795 | CLOSED Cleanup Required: R - CLEANUP REQUIRED HANDY WAY FOOD STORE #3333 170 TUSCAWILLA RD WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708-3715 WNW 0.23 / 1,208.67 m-12-813540753-a Facility ID | Facility Status: 8516641 | CLOSED Cleanup Required: R - CLEANUP REQUIRED, R - CLEANUP REQUIRED UST - Underground Storage Tanks A search of the UST database, dated Oct 1, 2024 has found that there are 3 UST site(s) within approximately 0.25miles of the project property. 5 8 16 6 9 12 117 17 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key MOBIL-WINTER SPRINGS #731 1205 E STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 WNW 0.12 / 639.91 m-6-813498473-a Facility ID | Facility Status: 9045623 | OPEN Tank Status | Status Date: U - IN SERVICE | 01-OCT-2008, B - REMOVED FROM SITE | 01-OCT-2008, B - REMOVED FROM SITE | 01-OCT-2008, B - REMOVED FROM SITE | 01-OCT-2008, U - IN SERVICE | 01-OCT- 2008, B - REMOVED FROM SITE | 01-OCT-2008 L D PLANTE INC 2950 RAILROAD AVE OVIEDO FL 32765 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 m-9-894358911-a Facility ID | Facility Status: 8520795 | CLOSED Tank Status | Status Date: B - REMOVED FROM SITE | 31-DEC-1988, B - REMOVED FROM SITE | 31-DEC- 1988 HANDY WAY FOOD STORE #3333 170 TUSCAWILLA RD WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 WNW 0.23 / 1,208.67 m-12-894361060-a Facility ID | Facility Status: 8516641 | CLOSED Tank Status | Status Date: B - REMOVED FROM SITE | 27-MAR-1995, B - REMOVED FROM SITE | 01-JUL- 2000, B - REMOVED FROM SITE | 27-MAR-1995, B - REMOVED FROM SITE | 01-JUL-2000, B - REMOVED FROM SITE | 27-MAR-1995 AST - Aboveground Storage Tanks A search of the AST database, dated Oct 1, 2024 has found that there are 2 AST site(s) within approximately 0.25miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key WINTER SPRINGS CITY - LIFT STATION 80 MICHAEL BLAKE BLVD WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 SW 0.06 / 312.76 m-4-894393874-a Facility ID | Facility Status: 9818667 | OPEN Tank Status | Content Code: U - IN SERVICE | G L D PLANTE INC 2950 RAILROAD AVE OVIEDO FL 32765 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 m-9-894396012-a Facility ID | Facility Status: 8520795 | CLOSED Tank Status | Content Code: B - REMOVED FROM SITE | D, B - REMOVED FROM SITE | D STCS - Storage Tank/Contaminated Facility Search A search of the STCS database, dated Aug 28, 2024 has found that there are 6 STCS site(s) within approximately 0.50miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key WINTER SPRINGS CITY - LIFT STATION 80 MICHAEL BLAKE BLVD WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 SW 0.06 / 312.76 m-4-896329468-a Facility ID | Fac Stat (OD): 9818667 | OPEN MOBIL-WINTER SPRINGS #731 1205 E STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 WNW 0.12 / 639.91 m-6-896360544-a Facility ID | Fac Stat (OD): 9045623 | OPEN L D PLANTE INC 2950 RAILROAD AVE OVIEDO FL 32765 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 m-9-896316434-a Facility ID | Fac Stat (OD): 8520795 | CLOSED HANDY WAY FOOD STORE #3333 170 TUSCAWILLA RD WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 WNW 0.23 / 1,208.67 m-12-896357211-a 6 9 12 4 9 4 6 9 12 118 18 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key Facility ID | Fac Stat (OD): 8516641 | CLOSED HI-FLAVOR MEATS INC 401 TUSKAWILLA RD WINTER SPRINGS FL 32308 WSW 0.30 / 1,567.39 m-15-896309477-a Facility ID | Fac Stat (OD): 8520784 | CLOSED PUBLIX SUPER MARKET #62 1160 E SR 434 WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 NW 0.42 / 2,206.15 m-17-896359442-a Facility ID | Fac Stat (OD): 9809815 | OPEN INST - Institutional Controls Registry A search of the INST database, dated Nov 11, 2024 has found that there are 1 INST site(s) within approximately 0.50miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key L D PLANTE INC 2950 RAILROAD AVENUE OVIEDO FL 32765 SSW 0.26 / 1,352.18 m-14-873504236-a ENG - Engineering Controls A search of the ENG database, dated Nov 11, 2024 has found that there are 1 ENG site(s) within approximately 0.50miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key L D PLANTE INC 2950 RAILROAD AVENUE OVIEDO FL 32765 SSW 0.26 / 1,352.18 m-14-893501142-a VCP - Voluntary Cleanup Sites A search of the VCP database, dated Aug 30, 2024 has found that there are 4 VCP site(s) within approximately 0.50miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key L D PLANTE (BF) 2950 RAILROAD AVE - OVIEDO FL - SSW 0.17 / 887.66 m-9-923853834-a L D PLANTE (BF) 2950 RAILROAD AVE - OVIEDO FL - SSW 0.17 / 887.66 m-9-902433393-a L D PLANTE (BF) 2950 RAILROAD AVE - OVIEDO FL - SSW 0.17 / 887.66 m-9-813587799-a L D PLANTE (BF) 2950 RAILROAD AVE - OVIEDO FL - SSW 0.17 / 887.66 m-9-923854179-a 15 17 14 14 9 9 9 9 119 19 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 BROWNFIELDS - Brownfield Sites A search of the BROWNFIELDS database, dated Jan 16, 2024 has found that there are 1 BROWNFIELDS site(s) within approximately 0.50miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key Former Central Florida Drum Facility 2950 (M-1 Zoning Area Only) and 2960 Railroad Avenue WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 m-10-813588067-a BROWNFIELD AREA - Brownfield Areas A search of the BROWNFIELD AREA database, dated Apr 2, 2024 has found that there are 2 BROWNFIELD AREA site(s) within approximately 0.50miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key TOWN CENTER S.E.E.D. / BROWNFIELD CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS FL ENE 0.00 / 0.00 m-1-821735648-a Former Central Florida Drum Facility WINTER SPRINGS FL SSW 0.17 / 887.66 m-11-821735646-a Non Standard Federal FINDS/FRS - Facility Registry Service/Facility Index A search of the FINDS/FRS database, dated Aug 1, 2024 has found that there are 2 FINDS/FRS site(s) within approximately 0.02miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key SEMINOLE CROSSING UNKNOWN WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 N 0.01 / 48.73 m-2-916891975-a Registry ID: 110070882674 MICHAEL BLAKE BOULEVARD UNKNOWN WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 WNW 0.01 / 55.84 m-3-815944806-a Registry ID: 110045481929 HMIRS - Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System A search of the HMIRS database, dated May 29, 2024 has found that there are 1 HMIRS site(s) within approximately 0.12miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key 1205 STATE ROAD 434 EAST WINTER SPRINGS FL WNW 0.12 / 639.91 m-6-880634269-a 10 1 11 2 3 6 120 20 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 MRDS - Mineral Resource Data System A search of the MRDS database, dated Mar 15, 2016 has found that there are 1 MRDS site(s) within approximately 1.00miles of the project property. Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key SULLIVAN MATERIALS - TUSCAWILLA UNITS SEMINOLE COUNTY WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 ESE 0.74 / 3,926.72 m-18-888585637-a Dep ID: 10306524 State DWM CONTAM - Contaminated Sites A search of the DWM CONTAM database, dated Jul 14, 2023 has found that there are 8 DWM CONTAM site(s) within approximately 0.50miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key 7-ELEVEN STORE #34786 1205 E STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 WNW 0.12 / 639.91 m-6-874820254-a Facility ID: 9045623 Facility Status: ACTIVE MOBIL R/S #10918 1205 E STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 WNW 0.12 / 639.91 m-6-874811642-a Facility ID: 9045623 Facility Status: ACTIVE MOBIL-WINTER SPRINGS #731 1205 E STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 WNW 0.12 / 639.91 m-6-874792639-a Facility ID: 9045623 L D PLANTE (BF) 2950 RAILROAD AVE OVIEDO FL SSW 0.17 / 887.66 m-9-874806319-a Facility ID: 38428 L.D.PLANTE 2950 RAILROAD AVENUE OVIEDO FL SSW 0.17 / 887.66 m-9-895374564-a L D PLANTE INC 2950 RAILROAD AVE OVIEDO FL 32765 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 m-9-902949434-a Facility ID: 8520795 HANDY WAY FOOD STORE #3333 170 TUSCAWILLA RD WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 WNW 0.23 / 1,208.67 m-12-902948121-a Facility ID: 8516641 HANDY WAY FOOD STORE #3333 170 TUSCAWILLA RD WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 WNW 0.23 / 1,208.67 m-12-874809453-a Facility ID: 8516641 Facility Status: ACTIVE DEL CONTAM SITE - Delisted Contaminated Sites A search of the DEL CONTAM SITE database, dated Sep 30, 2015 has found that there are 1 DEL CONTAM SITE site(s) within 18 6 6 6 9 9 9 12 12 121 21 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 approximately 0.50miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key HANDY WAY FOOD STORE #3333 170 TUSCAWILLA RD WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 WNW 0.23 / 1,208.67 m-12-822758487-a WELL SURVEILLANCE - Well Surveillance Program Facilities A search of the WELL SURVEILLANCE database, dated Jul 22, 2024 has found that there are 5 WELL SURVEILLANCE site(s) within approximately 0.25miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key MOBIL RS #10918 1205 W HWY 434 WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 WNW 0.12 / 639.91 m-6-866254304-a L D PLANTE INC 2950 RAILROAD AVE WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 m-9-866249010-a LD PLANTE 2950 RAILROAD AVE OVIEDO FL 32708 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 m-9-866259446-a PLANTE 2950 RAILROAD AVE WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 m-9-866248913-a HANDYWAY 170 TUSKAWILLA RD WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 WNW 0.23 / 1,208.67 m-12-866244026-a 12 6 9 9 9 12 122 #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #*#* #* #* #* m7c m2c m3c m8c m15c m16c m13c m17c m18c m4c(2) m5c(2) m6c(9) m12c(7) m9c(18) m1c m1c m11c m10c m11c m10cm14c(2) m14c(2) 81°14'30"W81°15'W81°15'30"W81°16'W81°16'30"W 28 ° 4 2 ' 3 0 " N 28 ° 4 2 ' 3 0 " N 28 ° 4 2 ' N 28 ° 4 2 ' N 28 ° 4 1 ' 3 0 " N 28 ° 4 1 ' 3 0 " N 28 ° 4 1 ' N 28 ° 4 1 ' N 0.3 0 0.30.15 Miles Order Number: 24112100943 Map: 1.0 Mile Radius 1:19750 Address: Michael Blake Boulevard, Winter Springs, FL Source: © 2021 ESRI StreetMap Premium © ERIS Information Inc. Project Property Buffer Outline #*Sites with Higher Elevation ")Sites with Same Elevation #*Sites with Lower Elevation (Sites with Unknown Elevation Areas with Higher Elevation Areas with Same Elevation Areas with Lower Elevation Areas with Unknown Elevation National Wetland Indian Reserve Land 100 Year Flood Zone 500 Year Flood Zone Freeways; Highways Traffic Circle; Ramp Major & Minor Arterial Traffic Circle; Ramp Local Road Rail Country State FWS Special Designation Areas National Priorities List (Active, Delisted, Proposed, Institutional Control) 7 2 3 8 15 16 13 17 18 4 (2) 5 (2) 6 (9) 12 (7) 9 (18) 1 1 11 11 10 10 14 (2) 14 (2) 123 #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* m7c m2c m3c m8c m15c m16c m13c m17c m4c(2)m5c(2) m6c(9) m12c(7) m9c(18) m1c m1c m11c m10c m11cm10c m14c(2) m14c(2) 81°15'W81°15'30"W81°16'W 28 ° 4 2 ' N 28 ° 4 2 ' N 28 ° 4 1 ' 3 0 " N 28 ° 4 1 ' 3 0 " N 0.15 0 0.150.075 Miles Order Number: 24112100943 Map: 0.5 Mile Radius 1:10750 Address: Michael Blake Boulevard, Winter Springs, FL Source: © 2021 ESRI StreetMap Premium © ERIS Information Inc. Project Property Buffer Outline #*Sites with Higher Elevation ")Sites with Same Elevation #*Sites with Lower Elevation (Sites with Unknown Elevation Areas with Higher Elevation Areas with Same Elevation Areas with Lower Elevation Areas with Unknown Elevation National Wetland Indian Reserve Land 100 Year Flood Zone 500 Year Flood Zone Freeways; Highways Traffic Circle; Ramp Major & Minor Arterial Traffic Circle; Ramp Local Road Rail Country State FWS Special Designation Areas National Priorities List (Active, Delisted, Proposed, Institutional Control) 7 2 3 8 15 16 13 17 4 (2)5 (2) 6 (9) 12 (7) 9 (18) 1 1 11 11 10 10 14 (2) 14 (2) 124 #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* m7c m2c m3c m8c m15c m16c m13c m17c m4c(2) m5c(2) m6c(9) m12c(7) m9c(18) m1c m1c m11c m10c m14c(2) m14c(2) m11cm10c 81°15'30"W 28 ° 4 2 ' N 28 ° 4 2 ' N 28 ° 4 1 ' 3 0 " N 28 ° 4 1 ' 3 0 " N 0.1 0 0.10.05 Miles Order Number: 24112100943 Map: 0.25 Mile Radius 1:6250 Address: Michael Blake Boulevard, Winter Springs, FL Source: © 2021 ESRI StreetMap Premium © ERIS Information Inc. Project Property Buffer Outline #*Sites with Higher Elevation ")Sites with Same Elevation #*Sites with Lower Elevation (Sites with Unknown Elevation Areas with Higher Elevation Areas with Same Elevation Areas with Lower Elevation Areas with Unknown Elevation National Wetland Indian Reserve Land 100 Year Flood Zone 500 Year Flood Zone Freeways; Highways Traffic Circle; Ramp Major & Minor Arterial Traffic Circle; Ramp Local Road Rail Country State FWS Special Designation Areas National Priorities List (Active, Delisted, Proposed, Institutional Control) 7 2 3 8 15 16 13 17 4 (2) 5 (2) 6 (9) 12 (7) 9 (18) 1 1 11 11 10 10 14 (2)14 (2) 125 Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community 81°15'W81°15'30"W81°16'W 28 ° 4 2 ' N 28 ° 4 2 ' N 28 ° 4 1 ' 3 0 " N 28 ° 4 1 ' 3 0 " N 0.1 0 0.10.05 Miles Order Number: 24112100943Aerial 1:10000 Address: Michael Blake Boulevard, Winter Springs, FL © ERIS Information Inc. Source: ESRI World Imagery Year: 2023 126 81°14'30"W81°15'W81°15'30"W81°16'W81°16'30"W81°17'W 28 ° 4 3 ' N 28 ° 4 3 ' N 28 ° 4 2 ' 3 0 " N 28 ° 4 2 ' 3 0 " N 28 ° 4 2 ' N 28 ° 4 2 ' N 28 ° 4 1 ' 3 0 " N 28 ° 4 1 ' 3 0 " N 28 ° 4 1 ' N 28 ° 4 1 ' N 28 ° 4 0 ' 3 0 " N 28 ° 4 0 ' 3 0 " N 0.35 0 0.350.175 Miles Order Number: 24112100943Topographic Map 1:24000 Address: Michael Blake Boulevard, FL © ERIS Information Inc. Source: USGS Topographic Map Quadrangle(s): Oviedo FL, Casselberry FL Year: 2021 127 27 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 h-Detail Report Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB m-1-821735648-b 1 of 1 ENE 0.00 / 0.00 28.77 / 0 TOWN CENTER S.E.E.D. / BROWNFIELD CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS FL dd-BROWNFIELD AREA-821735648-bb p1p-821735648-y1y Area ID: BF590803000 Latitude:28.70136235 User Name: WILLIAMS_CA Longitude:-81.264094 Method: PAPER Latitude Degrees:28 County: SEMINOLE Latitude Minutes:42 District: CENTRAL Latitude Seconds:4.90444992 Acreage: 2220603.5 Longitude Degrees:-81 Resolution No: 2008-36 Longitude Minutes:15 Resolution Date: 04-SEP-08 12.00.00.000000 AM Longitude Seconds:50.73841008 Shape Area: X Coordinate:666787.08142153 Shape Length: Y Coordinate:524645.88599683 Date Stamp:13-OCT-08 12.00.00.000000 AM Source:CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS Documents:https://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/electronic-documents/BF590803000/gis-facility!search m-2-916891975-b 1 of1 N 0.01 / 48.73 29.59 / 1 SEMINOLE CROSSING UNKNOWN WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 dd-FINDS/FRS-916891975-bb p1p-916891975-y1y Registry ID:110070882674 FIPS Code:FL117 HUC Code:03080101 Site Type Name:STATIONARY Location Description: Supplemental Location: Create Date:11-JAN-21 Update Date: Interest Types:ICIS-NPDES NON-MAJOR, STORM WATER CONSTRUCTION SIC Codes: SIC Code Descriptions: NAICS Codes: NAICS Code Descriptions: Conveyor:ICIS Federal Facility Code: Federal Agency Name: Tribal Land Code: Tribal Land Name: Congressional Dist No:24 Census Block Code:121170213062002 EPA Region Code:04 County Name:SEMINOLE US/Mexico Border Ind: Latitude:28.695722 Longitude:-81.258889 Reference Point: Coord Collection Method: Accuracy Value: Datum:NAD83 Source: Facility Detail Rprt URL:https://ofmpub.epa.gov/frs_public2/fii_query_detail.disp_program_facility?p_registry_id=110070882674 Data Source:Facility Registry Service - Single File Program Acronyms: 1 2 BROWNFIELD AREA FINDS/FRS Detail Report 128 28 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB m-3-815944806-b 1 of1 WNW 0.01 / 55.84 39.25 / 10 MICHAEL BLAKE BOULEVARD UNKNOWN WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 dd-FINDS/FRS-815944806-bb p1p-815944806-y1y Registry ID:110045481929 FIPS Code:FL117 HUC Code:03080101 Site Type Name:STATIONARY Location Description: Supplemental Location: Create Date:10-MAY-12 Update Date:11-JAN-16 Interest Types:ICIS-NPDES NON-MAJOR SIC Codes: SIC Code Descriptions: NAICS Codes: NAICS Code Descriptions: Conveyor:ICIS Federal Facility Code: Federal Agency Name: Tribal Land Code: Tribal Land Name: Congressional Dist No:24 Census Block Code:121170213062002 EPA Region Code:04 County Name:SEMINOLE US/Mexico Border Ind: Latitude:28.695 Longitude:-81.2602 Reference Point: Coord Collection Method: Accuracy Value:9999 Datum:NAD83 Source: Facility Detail Rprt URL:https://ofmpub.epa.gov/frs_public2/fii_query_detail.disp_program_facility?p_registry_id=110045481929 Data Source:Facility Registry Service - Single File Program Acronyms: m-4-894393874-b 1 of2 SW 0.06 / 312.76 32.79 / 4 WINTER SPRINGS CITY - LIFT STATION 80 MICHAEL BLAKE BLVD WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 dd-AST-894393874-bb p1p-894393874-y1y County Name:Facility ID:9818667 County:SEMINOLE Facility Status:OPEN Lat/Long Method:Facility Type:C Lat DD:Type Desc:Fuel user/Non-retail Lat MM:Facility Phone:4073271800 Lat SS:Dep Co:C Long DD:Owner ID:24225 Long MM:Owner Phone:4073271800 Long SS: Owner:WINTER SPRINGS CITY Owner Address1:1126 E SR 434 Owner Address2:ATTN: STORAGE TANK REGIS Owner City:WINTER SPRINGS Owner State:FL Owner Zip 5:32708 Contact:IAN FLETCHER Data Source:Tank Facility - All Locations and Tank Information; Tank Facility - All Locations and Owner Information; Tank Facility - All Locations and Coordinates Information Oculus Docs Inventory URL:https://erisservice7.ecologeris.com/ErisExt/flo/ocure.ashx?ID=9818667&CAT=11 Information Portal Fac URL:http://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/facilitysearch?pagination=true&facility.id=9818667 Information Portal Doc URL:http://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/electronic-documents/9818667/facility!search 3 4 FINDS/FRS AST 129 29 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Tank Information Tank ID:1 Install:01-AUG-2021 Status Date:01-AUG-2021 Tank Vessel Indic:TANK Tank Status:U - IN SERVICE Capacity:631 Tank Desc:Double Walled Fac Phone:4073271800 Tank Determin:DW Fac State:OPEN Tank Stat:U Place:ABOVEGROUND Fac Type:C Dep Co:C Type Desc:Fuel user/Non-retail Content Code:G Cont Desc:Emerg Generator Diesel Piping Tank ID:1 Piping Description:A-Abv, no soil contact Tank ID:1 Piping Description:N-Approved synthetic material Monitoring Tank ID:1 Monitoring Desc:Q-Visual inspection of ASTs Tank ID:1 Monitoring Desc:F-Monitor dbl wall tank space Tank ID:1 Monitoring Desc:1-Continuous electronic sensing Tank Construction Tank ID:1 Constr Code:I Constr Desc:Double wall Tank ID:1 Constr Code:C Constr Desc:Steel Tank ID:1 Constr Code:P Constr Desc:Level gauges/alarms Tank ID:1 Constr Code:M Constr Desc:Spill containment bucket m-4-896329468-b 2 of2 SW 0.06 / 312.76 32.79 / 4 WINTER SPRINGS CITY - LIFT STATION 80 MICHAEL BLAKE BLVD WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 dd-STCS-896329468-bb p1p-896329468-y1y Facility ID:9818667 Clnup Cd (OD): Type:C - Fuel User/Non-Retail Fac Clnup Stat (OD): Status:Open Clnup Dt (OD): Status (OD):REVIEWED Status (Map):REVIEWED Fac Stat (OD):OPEN Contam (Map): Fac Code (OD):C Fac Type (Map):Fuel user/Non-retail Facility 1:Fuel user/Non-retail Fac Stat (Map):OPEN 4 STCS 130 30 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Fac Name (OD):WINTER SPRINGS CITY - LIFT STATION Address (OD):80 MICHAEL BLAKE BLVD City (OD):WINTER SPRINGS County (OD):SEMINOLE Zip5 (OD):32708 Name (Map):WINTER SPRINGS CITY - LIFT STATION Address (Map):80 MICHAEL BLAKE BLVD City (Map):WINTER SPRINGS County (Map):59 Zip4 (Map):0 Zip5 (Map):32708 Address Line 1:80 Michael Blake Blvd Address Line 2: City:Winter Springs County:SEMINOLE State:FL Zip:32708 Report Source:FDEP Geospatial Open Data - Registered Tanks from Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring (STCM) (OD); FDEP Geospatial Open Data - Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring (STCM) (Map); Storage Tank Contaminated Facility Name and Address Search FDEP Storage Tank Monitoring Open Data Details Object ID:70972 Map Src:imagerywithroads X:-81.2612656666684 Map Scale:1128 Y:28.6939910000032 Elevation: Regulated:YES El Datum: Col Meth:DPHO El Resolut: Col Name:WILLIAMS_CA El Units: Col Date:16-Aug-2021 ALB East:667080.99 Col Prog:TANKS-PETROLEUM CONTAMINATION ALB North:523833.61 Ver Meth:DPHO Loc ID:71942 Ver Name:WILLIAMS_CA Lat DD:28 Ver Prog:TANKS-PETROLEUM CONTAMINATION Lat MM:41 Ver Date:16-Aug-2021 Lat SS: OOIC:FACILITY Long DD:81 Rel Feat:CENTR Long MM:15 Datum:NAD83 Long SS: Coord Acc:4 Col Aff:FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Ver Aff:FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Direct: Documents:https://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/electronic-documents/9818667/gis-facility!search FDEP Open Data - Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring (STCM) Loc ID:71942 Rel Feat:CENTR Site Type:Fuel user/Non-retail El Datum: Contam Ind:El Resolut: Phone:4073271800 El Units: Operator:CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS Map Src:imagerywithroads Next action:PLACARD 18-JUL-2024 Map Scale:1128 Fin Respon:Coord Acc:4 Office:CD Alb East:667080.99 OOIC:FACILITY Alb North:523833.61 Col Meth:DPHO Datum:NAD83 Col Name:WILLIAMS_CA Elevation: Col Date:8/16/2021 Lat DD:28 Col Prog:TANKS-PETROLEUM CONTAMINATION Lat MM:41 Ver Meth:DPHO Lat SS: Ver Name:WILLIAMS_CA Long DD:81 Ver Prog:TANKS-PETROLEUM CONTAMINATION Long MM:15 Ver Date:8/16/2021 Long SS: Object ID:71942 Col Aff:FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Ver Aff:FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Documents:https://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/electronic-documents/9818667/gis-facility!search 131 31 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Storage Tank Contaminated Facility Name & Address Search Details Name:Winter Springs City - Lift Station 80 Michael Blake Blvd Winter Springs, FL 32708 LL Method:DPHO Account Owner:Winter Springs City Contact:City Of Winter Springs Phone:407-327-1800 District:CD County 1:59 - Seminole Latitude:28:41:38.3676 Longitude:81:15:40.5564 FDEP - Registered Tanks from Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring (STCM) Details Tank No:1 Size:631 Content:Emerg Generator Diesel Installed:08/01/2021 Placement:ABOVE Status:In Service Construction:C - Steel I - Double Wall M - Spill Containment Bucket P - Level Gauges/Alarms Piping:A - Abv, No Soil Contact N - Approved Synthetic Material Monitoring:1 - Continuous Electronic Sensing F - Monitor Dbl Wall Tank Space Q - Visual Inspection Of Asts m-5-867335530-b 1 of2 WSW 0.09 / 451.47 40.53 / 12 SCRIMSHER PARCEL E SR 434 WINTER SPRINGS, FL dd-WCRPS-867335530-bb p1p-867335530-y1y Site ID:346911 Coord Accuracy ID:3 Datum ID:NAD83 Zip5:32708 Method ID:DPHO Zip4: Feature:County ID:59 Object of Interest:CAP_RAP SITE County:SEMINOLE Proximity to Object:EXACT Lat DD:28 Interpolation Scale:12000 Lat MM:41 Map Source:IMAGERY_11_13 Long DD:81 Map Source Scale:12000 Long MM:15 Collect Program ID:CR Collect Username:HOUSTON_G Collect Affiliation:Florida Department of Environmental Protection Verifying Program ID:CR Verify Method ID:DPHO Verifier Username:HOUSTON_G Verifier Affiliation:Florida Department of Environmental Protection Project Name:SCRIMSHER PARCEL Documents:https://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/electronic-documents/COM_346911/gis-facility!search Project Details Project ID:352812 District:CD OGC No:GIS ALBX:667143.17 Status:CLOSED GIS ALBY:523807.99 Priority Score:Source:Closed Responsible Party Sites Offsite COC:N Contaminants: 5 WCRPS 132 32 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB m-5-894782037-b 2 of2 WSW 0.09 / 451.47 40.53 / 12 SCRIMISHER PARCEL E SR 434 WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708 dd-ERIC-894782037-bb p1p-894782037-y1y Eric ID:ERIC_11188 Offste Contami Key:NOCONTAM Site Status:CLOSED Se Anno Cad Data: Source Facility ID:138637 State:FL District:CD County Name:Seminole WMD:SJRWMD County ID:59 ICR Indicator:NO Datum ID:NAD83 Discharge Date:Geometry: Method ID:DPHO X:-81.2606340977941 Object of Interest:CAP_R Y:28.6937478753188 Proximit to Object:EXACT Lat DD:28 Collector Username:HOUSTON_G Lat MM:41 Collect Date:Lat SS: Map Source:IMAGERY_11_13 Long DD:81 Map Source Scale:12000 Long MM:15 Intrpolation Scale:12000 Long SS: Coord Accuracy ID:3 Gis Albx:667143.17 Site Phase Dsc:Phase 2 - Full Assessment Gis Alby:523807.99 Site Name:SCRIMSHER PARCEL Documents:https://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/electronic-documents/ERIC_11188/gis-facility!search Program Details Program:Responsible Party Cleanup Program Type:RESPONSPARTY Program Status:COMPLETE Site Manager:George Houston m-6-810078951-b 1 of9 WNW 0.12 / 639.91 42.80 / 14 MOBIL OIL CORP SS #Q8M 1205 E SR 434 WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 dd-RCRA NON GEN-810078951-bb p1p-810078951-y1y EPA Handler ID:FLD984205518 Gen Status Universe:No Report Contact Name:DAN HORTON Contact Address:3225 , GALLOWS RD , , FAIRFAX , VA, 22037-0002 , US Contact Phone No and Ext:703-849-3330 Contact Email: Contact Country:US County Name:SEMINOLE EPA Region:04 Land Type:Private Receive Date:20111012 Location Latitude:28.695923 Location Longitude:-81.262253 Violation/Evaluation Summary Note:NO RECORDS: As of Apr 2024, there are no Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement (violation) records associated with this facility (EPA ID). Handler Summary Importer Activity:No Mixed Waste Generator:No Transporter Activity:No Transfer Facility:No Onsite Burner Exemption:No Furnace Exemption:No Underground Injection Activity:No Commercial TSD:No 5 6 ERIC RCRA NON GEN 133 33 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Used Oil Transporter:No Used Oil Transfer Facility:No Used Oil Processor:No Used Oil Refiner:No Used Oil Burner:No Used Oil Market Burner:No Used Oil Spec Marketer:No Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No:199108 Receive Date:19910802 Handler Name:MOBIL OIL CORP SS #Q8M Source Type:Notification Federal Waste Generator Code:2 Generator Code Description:Small Quantity Generator Waste Code Details Hazardous Waste Code:D001 Waste Code Description:IGNITABLE WASTE Hazardous Waste Code:D018 Waste Code Description:BENZENE Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No:201110 Receive Date:20111012 Handler Name:MOBIL OIL CORP SS #Q8M Source Type:Notification Federal Waste Generator Code:N Generator Code Description:Not a Generator, Verified Waste Code Details Hazardous Waste Code:D001 Waste Code Description:IGNITABLE WASTE Hazardous Waste Code:D018 Waste Code Description:BENZENE Owner/Operator Details Owner/Operator Ind:Current Operator Street No: Type:Private Street 1:3225 GALLOWS RD Name:MOBIL OIL CORP SS # Q8M Street 2: Date Became Current:19910615 City:FAIRFAX Date Ended Current:State:VA Phone:Country:US Source Type:Notification Zip Code:22037 Owner/Operator Ind:Current Owner Street No: Type:Private Street 1:3225 GALLOWS RD Name:HORTON DAN Street 2: Date Became Current:20000209 City:FAIRFAX Date Ended Current:State:VA Phone:Country:US Source Type:Notification Zip Code:22037 Owner/Operator Ind:Current Owner Street No: Type:Private Street 1:3225 GALLOWS RD Name:DAN HORTON Street 2: 134 34 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Date Became Current:20000209 City:FAIRFAX Date Ended Current:State:VA Phone:Country:US Source Type:Notification Zip Code:22037 Owner/Operator Ind:Current Operator Street No: Type:Private Street 1:3225 GALLOWS RD Name:DONNA HYMES Street 2: Date Became Current:20111027 City:FAIRFAX Date Ended Current:State:VA Phone:Country:US Source Type:Notification Zip Code:22037 Historical Handler Details Receive Dt:19910802 Generator Code Description:Small Quantity Generator Handler Name:MOBIL OIL CORP SS #Q8M m-6-813498473-b 2 of9 WNW 0.12 / 639.91 42.80 / 14 MOBIL-WINTER SPRINGS #731 1205 E STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 dd-UST-813498473-bb p1p-813498473-y1y Facility ID:9045623 County:SEMINOLE Facility Status:OPEN Lat/Long Method: Facility Type:A Lat DD:28 Type Desc:Retail Station Lat MM:41 Facility Phone:8136814279 Lat SS:45.59 Dep Co:C Long DD:81 Owner ID:922 Long MM:15 Owner Phone:8136814279 Long SS:43.85 Owner:AUTOMATED PETROLEUM & ENERGY CO INC (APEC) Owner Address1:PO BOX 1110 Owner Address2:ATTN: STORAGE TANK REGIS Owner City:Brandon Owner State:FL Owner Zip 5:33509 Contact:BILL MCKNIGHT | RICK HERWEH Source:Tank Facility - All Locations and Tank Information; Tank Facility - All Locations and Owner Information; Tank Facility - All Locations and Coordinates Information Oculus Docs Inventory URL:https://erisservice7.ecologeris.com/ErisExt/flo/ocure.ashx?ID=9045623&CAT=11 Information Portal Fac URL:http://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/facilitysearch?pagination=true&facility.id=9045623 Information Portal Doc URL:http://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/electronic-documents/9045623/facility!search Tank Information Tank ID:5 Capacity:20000 Tank Status:U - IN SERVICE Substance:B - Unleaded Gas Status Date:01-OCT-2008 Placement:UNDERGROUND Installation Date:01-OCT-2008 Tank Vessel Indic:TANK Tank Desc:Double Walled Piping Tank ID:5 Pipe Description:J-Pressurized piping system Tank ID:5 Pipe Description:K-Dispenser liners Tank ID:5 Pipe Description:F-Double wall Tank ID:5 Pipe Description:C-Fiberglass 6 UST 135 35 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Monitoring Tank ID:5 Monitoring Desc:F-Monitor dbl wall tank space Tank ID:5 Monitoring Desc:G-Electronic line leak detector Tank ID:5 Monitoring Desc:L-Automatic tank gauging - USTs Tank ID:5 Monitoring Desc:K-Monitor dbl wall pipe space Tank ID:5 Monitoring Desc:1-Continuous electronic sensing Tank ID:5 Monitoring Desc:4-Visual inspect dispenser liners Tank ID:5 Monitoring Desc:2-Visual inspect pipe sumps Tank Construction Tank ID:5 Cons Code:N Cons Desc:Flow shut-Off Tank ID:5 Cons Code:E Cons Desc:Fiberglass Tank ID:5 Cons Code:M Cons Desc:Spill containment bucket Tank ID:5 Cons Code:I Cons Desc:Double wall Tank ID:5 Cons Code:O Cons Desc:Tight fill Tank Information Tank ID:2 Capacity:10000 Tank Status:B - REMOVED FROM SITE Substance:B - Unleaded Gas Status Date:01-OCT-2008 Placement:UNDERGROUND Installation Date:01-NOV-1989 Tank Vessel Indic:TANK Tank Desc: Tank Information Tank ID:4 Capacity:10000 Tank Status:B - REMOVED FROM SITE Substance:B - Unleaded Gas Status Date:01-OCT-2008 Placement:UNDERGROUND Installation Date:01-NOV-1989 Tank Vessel Indic:TANK Tank Desc: Tank Information 136 36 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Tank ID:1 Capacity:10000 Tank Status:B - REMOVED FROM SITE Substance:B - Unleaded Gas Status Date:01-OCT-2008 Placement:UNDERGROUND Installation Date:01-NOV-1989 Tank Vessel Indic:TANK Tank Desc: Tank Information Tank ID:6 Capacity:20000 Tank Status:U - IN SERVICE Substance:D - Vehicular Diesel Status Date:01-OCT-2008 Placement:UNDERGROUND Installation Date:01-OCT-2008 Tank Vessel Indic:TANK Tank Desc:Double Walled Piping Tank ID:6 Pipe Description:F-Double wall Tank ID:6 Pipe Description:J-Pressurized piping system Tank ID:6 Pipe Description:C-Fiberglass Tank ID:6 Pipe Description:K-Dispenser liners Monitoring Tank ID:6 Monitoring Desc:K-Monitor dbl wall pipe space Tank ID:6 Monitoring Desc:F-Monitor dbl wall tank space Tank ID:6 Monitoring Desc:2-Visual inspect pipe sumps Tank ID:6 Monitoring Desc:L-Automatic tank gauging - USTs Tank ID:6 Monitoring Desc:G-Electronic line leak detector Tank ID:6 Monitoring Desc:4-Visual inspect dispenser liners Tank ID:6 Monitoring Desc:1-Continuous electronic sensing Tank Construction Tank ID:6 Cons Code:M Cons Desc:Spill containment bucket Tank ID:6 Cons Code:N Cons Desc:Flow shut-Off Tank ID:6 Cons Code:I 137 37 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Cons Desc:Double wall Tank ID:6 Cons Code:E Cons Desc:Fiberglass Tank ID:6 Cons Code:L Cons Desc:Compartmented Tank ID:6 Cons Code:O Cons Desc:Tight fill Tank Information Tank ID:3 Capacity:10000 Tank Status:B - REMOVED FROM SITE Substance:B - Unleaded Gas Status Date:01-OCT-2008 Placement:UNDERGROUND Installation Date:01-NOV-1989 Tank Vessel Indic:TANK Tank Desc: m-6-813546516-b 3 of9 WNW 0.12 / 639.91 42.80 / 14 MOBIL-WINTER SPRINGS #731 1205 E STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708-2811 dd-LST-813546516-bb p1p-813546516-y1y Facility ID:9045623 Score:46 Facility Status:OPEN Score Effctve Date:02/29/2008 Facility Type:A - Retail Station Score when Ranked:30 Feature:Facility Name:MOBIL-WINTER SPRINGS #731 Method:DPHO Address1:1205 E STATE ROAD 434 Rank:4871 Address2: Operator:RICK HERWEH City:WINTER SPRINGS Phone:(813)681-4279 State:FL Name Changed:10/28/2013 Zip5:32708 Address Changed:10/25/2018 Zip4:2811 Prim Related Party:922 District:CD Primary RP Role:ACCOUNT OWNER County:SEMINOLE RP Begin Date:10/28/2013 County No:59 RP Name:AUTOMATED PETROLEUM & ENERGY CO INC (APEC) Datum:0 RP Address1:PO BOX 1110 Lat DD:28 RP Address2:ATTN: STORAGE TANK REGIS Lat MM:41 RP City:Brandon Lat SS:44.6788 RP State:FL Long DD:81 RP Zip5:33509 Long MM:15 RP Zip4:1110 Long SS:43.9905 Contact:BILL MCKNIGHT | RICK HERWEH Section:031 RP Phone:(813)681-4279 Township:20S RP Phone Ext.:211 Range:31E RP Bad Addr Ind:No Facility ID (Map):9045623 Facility Type (Map):Retail Station Facility Status (Map):OPEN Facility Name (Map):MOBIL-WINTER SPRINGS #731 Address (Map):1205 E STATE ROAD 434 City (Map):WINTER SPRINGS Zip5 (Map):32708 County (Map):SEMINOLE Lat DD (Map):28 Lat MM (Map):41 Lat SS (Map): Long DD (Map):81 Long MM (Map):15 Long SS (Map): Datum (Map):HARN Geometry (Map): 6 LST 138 38 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Rel Feat (Map):EXACT Collection (Map):DPHO Collector (Map):PERRY_JF59 Collection Date (Map):7/23/2003 Document Link (Map):https://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/electronic-documents/9045623/facility!search Oculus Docs Inventory:https://erisservice7.ecologeris.com/ErisExt/flo/ocure.ashx?ID=9045623&CAT=11 Information Portal Fac URL:http://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/facilitysearch?pagination=true&facility.id=9045623 Information Portal Doc URL:http://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/electronic-documents/9045623/facility!search Source:DEP; Storage Tanks & Contamination Monitoring, Discharge Info.; FDEP Open Data, Petroleum Contamination Monitoring (PCTS) Discharges (Map) Discharge Cleanup Summary Discharge Date:04/26/1993 Cleanup Required:R - CLEANUP REQUIRED Discharge Cleanup Status:RA - RA ONGOING Discharge Cleanup Stat Date:05/10/2013 Eligibility Indicator:E - ELIGIBLE Site Manager:PRESS_DM Site Manager End Date: Tank Office:PCLP48 - ORANGE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIV Contaminated Media Contaminated Drinking Wells:0 Contaminated Mntring Wells:YES Contaminated Soil:NO Contaminated Surface Water:NO Contaminated Ground Water:NO Pollutant:B - Unleaded Gas Other Description: Gallons Discharged:25 Petroleum Cleanup Program Eligibility Cleanup Program:P - PETROLEUM LIABILITY AND RESTORATION INSURANCE PROGRAM Eligibility Status:ELIGIBLE Task Info SA Task ID:84141 SR Soil Treatment: SA Cleanup Resp:-SR Other Treatment: SA Actual Cost:SR Alt Proc Rec: SA Complete Date:RAP Task ID: SA Payment Date:RAP Clean Resp ID:- SR Task ID:RAP Actual Cost: SR Cleanup Resp:-RAP Complete Date: SR Actual Cost:RAP Payment Date: SR Complete Date:RAP Last Ord Appr: SR Payment Date:RA Task ID:89795 SR Oral Date:RA Cleanup Resp:- SR Written Date:RA Yrs to Complete: SR Soil Removal:RA Actual Cost: SR Free Prod Rmvl:Tank Office:PCLP48 - Orange County SR Soil Ton Remove: SR Fund Elig Type:- SA Fund Elig Type:- RAP Fund Elig Type:- RA Fund Elig Type:- SR Alternate Procedure Status: SR Alt Procedure Status Dt: SR Alt Procedure Comment: SRC Action Type:- SRC Submit Date: 139 39 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB SRC Review Date: SRC Complete Status:- SRC Comp Status Dt: SRC Issue Date: SRC Comments: Petroleum Cleanup Funding Cap Encumbrance to Date FCFS:$0.00 LPSPASM:$0.00 SPASM:$0.00 NPDES:$0.00 Utility 1 Time Payments:$0.00 All Wo Ta Co Pos Encumbered:$29,147.47 Wo Ta Co Pos Exclu from Cap:$0.00 Ttl Amnt Encumbered to Date:$29,147.47 Ttl Amnt Encumbered Towar:$29,147.47 Petroleum Cleanup PCT Facility Score Related Party ID:922 RP Contact:BILL MCKNIGHT | RICK HERWEH Facility Cleanup Status:ONGO - ONGOING Bad Address Indicator:N Contract Contractor:FRS ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION, INC. DBA MONTROSE ENVIRONMENT Score:46 Facility Name:MOBIL-WINTER SPRINGS #731 Address:1205 E STATE ROAD 434 City:WINTER SPRINGS ZIP:32708 District:CD County ID:59 County:SEMINOLE Discharge Info (Map) Discharge:9484 Eligibility:ELIGIBLE Discharge 1:26-Apr-1993 Eligibility 1:PLIRP Discharge 2:46 Report Pha:RA Discharge 3:RA Report Sub:SA General Cl:WORK UNDERWAY Report S 1:31-Mar-2020 Disch Clea:10-May-2013 Staff Assi:PRESS_DM Tank Offic:ORANGE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIV Open Discharges Program:PLIRP Eligibility:ELIGIBLE Elig Letter Sent:10/23/2007 Discharge Date:04/26/1993 Score:46 Facility:MOBIL-WINTER SPRINGS #731 Address:1205 E STATE ROAD 434 City:WINTER SPRINGS State:FL Zip:32708 County ID:59 County:SEMINOLE 140 40 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB AST UST Discharges Dep Co:P Long MM:15 CU Req:R Long SS:43.85 Score:00046 Stat Desc:RA ONGOING Descrip:CLEANUP REQUIRED Fac Name:MOBIL-WINTER SPRINGS #731 Discharge Date:26-APR-93 Fac Type:A Score Date:29-FEB-2008 Type Desc:Retail Station Stat Date:10-MAY-2013 Fac Addr:1205 E STATE ROAD 434 LL Meth:DPHO Fac City:WINTER SPRINGS Lat DD:28 Fac Zip:32708 Lat MM:41 County:59 Lat SS:45.59 Fac State:OPEN Long DD:81 Fac Phone:8136814279 Prg Desc:PETROLEUM LIABILITY AND RESTORATION INSURANCE PROGRAM Eligible Discharges Program:PLIRP Current Status:ACTIVE Discharge Date:04/26/1993 Score:46 Facility:MOBIL-WINTER SPRINGS #731 Address:1205 E STATE ROAD 434 City:WINTER SPRINGS Zip:32708 County:SEMINOLE Owner:AUTOMATED PETROLEUM & ENERGY CO INC (APEC) Owner Address:PO BOX 1110 Owner City:Brandon Owner State:FL Owner Zip:33509 Owner Phone:(813)681-4279 Owner Email:RICK@APECGAS.COM m-6-866254304-b 4 of9 WNW 0.12 / 639.91 42.80 / 14 MOBIL RS #10918 1205 W HWY 434 WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 dd-WELL SURVEILLANCE-866254304-bb p1p-866254304-y1y Facility ID:9045623 County:SEMINOLE Project ID:SUPER Longitude:-81.262235 Req No:Latitude:28.695738 Loc ID:193775 GPS Date:11/20/2007 0:00:00 GPS ID:193775 Datum:WS1984 Type:PETROLEUM Software:Risk_Solo_v2 Insp CHD:SEMINOLE Streetside: HAE:15.12 Agency:DOH Loc Method:DGPS - Differentially Corrected GPS Insp F Name:JOYCE Insp L Name:BITTLE Comment: m-6-874792639-b 5 of9 WNW 0.12 / 639.91 42.80 / 14 MOBIL-WINTER SPRINGS #731 1205 E STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 dd-DWM CONTAM-874792639-bb p1p-874792639-y1y Facility ID:9045623 Contact: Site ID:9045623 Phone: Program Area:Method: Facility Type:Datum: Fac Type:Related Party ID: County ID:59 Primary RP Role: Ftc1 Fac Type ID:A RP Begin Date: Stcm Facility Type:A RP Address1: District:CD RP Address2: 6 6 WELL SURVEILLANCE DWM CONTAM 141 41 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Site Status:RP City: Section:31 RP State: Township:20S RP Zip5: County:Seminole RP Zip4: Range:31E RP Phone: Rank:RP Extension: Operator:RP Bad Addr Ind: Name Changed:RP Name: Addr Changed: Facility Name:MOBIL-WINTER SPRINGS #731 Description:Retail Station Program Details Facility Status:Staff Assigned: Offsite Contam:Priority: Priority Score:46 Score Effective Dt: Project Coordinato:Score When Ranked: Program Eligible:District: Ineligible:Datum:0 Program Area:PETROLEUM Method:DPHO Site Manager:PRESS_DM Lat DD:28 Discharge Date:4/26/1993 Lat MM:41 Discharge Eligibil:E Lat SS:45.59 Eligibility Progrm:PLIRP Long DD:81 Cleanup Status:OPEN-STCM Long MM:15 Closure Type:Long SS:43.85 Closure Date: m-6-874811642-b 6 of9 WNW 0.12 / 639.91 42.80 / 14 MOBIL R/S #10918 1205 E STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 dd-DWM CONTAM-874811642-bb p1p-874811642-y1y Facility ID:9045623 Contact: Site ID:Phone: Program Area:Petroleum Method: Facility Type:Datum: Fac Type:Related Party ID: County ID:Primary RP Role: Ftc1 Fac Type ID:RP Begin Date: Stcm Facility Type:RP Address1: District:RP Address2: Site Status:RP City: Section:RP State: Township:RP Zip5: County:SEMINOLE RP Zip4: Range:RP Phone: Rank:RP Extension: Operator:RP Bad Addr Ind: Name Changed:RP Name: Addr Changed: Facility Name: Description: Program Details Facility Status:ACTIVE Staff Assigned: Offsite Contam:U Priority: Priority Score:46 Score Effective Dt: Project Coordinato:DURANT_RJ Score When Ranked: Program Eligible:Y District:PCLP59 Ineligible:Datum:HARN Program Area:Method:DPHO Site Manager:Lat DD:28 Discharge Date:Lat MM:41 Discharge Eligibil:Lat SS:44.6788 6 DWM CONTAM 142 42 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Eligibility Progrm:Long DD:81 Cleanup Status:Long MM:15 Closure Type:Long SS:43.9905 Closure Date: m-6-874820254-b 7 of9 WNW 0.12 / 639.91 42.80 / 14 7-ELEVEN STORE #34786 1205 E STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 dd-DWM CONTAM-874820254-bb p1p-874820254-y1y Facility ID:9045623 Contact: Site ID:Phone: Program Area:Petroleum Method: Facility Type:Datum: Fac Type:Related Party ID: County ID:Primary RP Role: Ftc1 Fac Type ID:RP Begin Date: Stcm Facility Type:RP Address1: District:RP Address2: Site Status:RP City: Section:RP State: Township:RP Zip5: County:SEMINOLE RP Zip4: Range:RP Phone: Rank:RP Extension: Operator:RP Bad Addr Ind: Name Changed:RP Name: Addr Changed: Facility Name: Description: Program Details Facility Status:ACTIVE Staff Assigned: Offsite Contam:U Priority: Priority Score:46 Score Effective Dt: Project Coordinato:PRESS_DM Score When Ranked: Program Eligible:Y District:PCLP48 Ineligible:Datum:HARN Program Area:Method:DPHO Site Manager:Lat DD:28 Discharge Date:Lat MM:41 Discharge Eligibil:Lat SS:44.6788 Eligibility Progrm:Long DD:81 Cleanup Status:Long MM:15 Closure Type:Long SS:43.9905 Closure Date: m-6-880634269-b 8 of9 WNW 0.12 / 639.91 42.80 / 14 1205 STATE ROAD 434 EAST WINTER SPRINGS FL dd-HMIRS-880634269-bb p1p-880634269-y1y Incident County:SEMINOLE HMIR Historical Reports Report No:I-2002030877 Fed DOT Agency Nm: Report Type:A hazardous material incident Fed DOT Report No: Date of Incident:2002-03-02 Report Submit Src:Paper Time of Incident:0730 Inc Multiple Rows:No Haz Class Code:Inc Non US State: Hazardous Class:3 Mode Transport:Highway Commodity Short Nm:GASOLINE INCLUDES GASOLI Transport Phase:Unloading Commodity Long Nm:GASOLINE INCLUDES GASOLINE MIXED WITH ETHYL ALCOHOL, WITH NOT MORE THAN 10% ALCOHOL Incident Occrrnce: 6 6 DWM CONTAM HMIRS 143 43 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Trade Name:GASOLINE Mat Ship Approval?:No ID No:UN1203 Mat Ship Approv No: Haz Waste Ind:No Undecl Hazmat Ship?:No Haz Waste EPA No:Packaging Type:Cargo Tank Motor Vehicle (CTMV) HMIS Tox Inhalation?:No Packing Group: TIH Hazard Zone:Carrier Reporter:MC KENZIE TANK LINES INC Qty Released:5 CR Street Name:122 APPLEYARD DRIVE Unit of Measure:Liquid - Gallon CR City:TALLAHASSEE What Failed:CR State:FL What Failed Desc:CR Postal Code:32304 How Failed Code:CR Non US State: How Failed Desc:CR Fed DOT ID:89896 Failure Cause Code:CR Hazmat Reg ID: Failure Cause Desc:CR Country:US Ident. Markings:Shipper Name:KINDER MORGAN Cont1 Pkging Type:Shipper Street Name:9919 SOUTH ORANGE AVENUE Cont1 Const Mat:Shipper City:TAFT Cont1 Head Type:Shipper State:FL Cont1 Pkg Capacity:9500 Shipper Postal:32824 C1 Capacity UOM:LGA Shipper Non US St: Cont1 Pkg Amt:0 Shipper Country:US C1 Pkg Amt UOM:Shipper Waybill:793084 Cont1 Pkg No:1 Ship Hazmat Reg ID: C1 Pkg NO Failed:1 Origin City: Cont1 Pkg Mnfctr:HEIL COMPANY Origin State: Cont1 Pkg Mnfct Dt:0-00-00 00:00:00 Origin Postal: Cont1 Pkg Serial NO:A3A7B417H5 Origin Non US St: C1 Pkg Last Test Dt:2001-05-17 00:00:00 Origin Country:US C1 Test Const Mat:Destination City:WINTER SPRINGS C1 Pkg Dsign Pres.:0 Destination State:FLORIDA C1 Dsign Press UOM:Destination Postal: C1 Pkg Shell Thick:0 Destination Non US: C1 Shell Thick UOM:Destination Country:US C1 Head Thickness:0 Cont2 Package Type: C1 Head Thick UOM:Cont2 Const Mat: C1 Pkg Srvc Pres.:0 Cont2 Pkg Capacity:0 C1 Srvc Press UOM:Cont2 Capacity UOM: C1 Valve/Device Fail?:No Cont2 Pkg Amount:0 C1 Device Type:Cont2 Pkg Amt UOM: C1 Device Mnfctr:Cont2 Pkg No:0 C1 Device Model:Cont2 Pkg No Failed:0 NRC No: RAM Pkg Category:Haz NonHosp Public:0 RAM Pkg Cert.:FALSE Haz NonHosp Old: RAM Pkg Cert. NBR:Tot Haz Non Hosp Inj: RAM Nuclide S:Total Hazmat Injuries:0 RAM Transport Index:Evacuation Indicator:No RAM UOM:Public Evacuated:0 RAM Activity Rpted:0 Employees Evac:0 RAM UOM Rpted:Total Evacuated:0 RAM Activity:0 Total Evacuation Hrs:0 RAM Activity UOM:Major Artery Closed:No RAM Mat Safety:Mjr Artery Hrs Closed:0 Spillage Result:Yes Material Involved:No Fire Result:No Estimated Speed:0 Explosion Result:No Weather Conditions: Water Sewer Result:No Vehicle Overturn:No Gas Dispersion:No Vehicle Left Roadway:No Environment Damage:No Passenger Aircraft:No No Release Result:No Cargo Baggage: Fire EMS Report:No Ship Non Transport:No Fire EMS EMS Report:Ship Air First Flight:No Police Report:No Ship Air Subflight:No Police Report No:Ship Init Transport:No In House Cleanup:No Ship Phase Transfer:No Other Cleanup:No Contact Name:MIKE MCCOY Damage > 500:No Contact Title:OPERATIONS MANAGER Material Loss:5 Contact Business: 144 44 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Carrier Damage:0 Contact Street: Property Damage:0 Contact City: Response Cost:0 Contact State: Remediation Cost:0 Contact Postal: Damage Old Form:0 Contact Non US St: Total Damages Amt:5 Contact Country:US Hazmat Fatality:No Inc. Report Prepared: Haz Fatal Employees:0 HMIS Serious Incidnt:No Haz Fatal Respndrs:0 HMIS Serious Fatality:No Haz Fatal Gen Public:0 HMIS Serious Injury:No Tot Hazmat Fatalities:0 HMIS Flight Plan:No Non Hazmat Fatality:No HMIS Serious Evacs:No Non Hazmat Fatals:0 HMIS Major Artery:No Hazmat Injury:No HMIS Bulk Release:No Haz Hospital Empl:0 HMIS Marine Pollutnt:No Haz Hospital Resp:0 HMIS Radioactive:No Haz Hosp Gen Public:0 HMIS Gen Pkg Type:TANK Haz Hosp Old Form:0 HMIS Container Code:MC307 Total Haz Hosp Inj:0 HMIS Container Desc:Cargo tanks Haz Non Hosp Empl:0 HMIS Bulk Incident:Yes Haz Non Hosp Resp:0 Undeclared Shipment:No Description of Events:DRIVER WAS DROPPING REGULAR GASOLINE, CLAIMED THERE WAS A VAPOR BACK UP, SPILLING APPROXIMATELY 5 GALLONS ON THE GROUND. DRIVER CLEANED UP AREA WITH ABSORBENT PADS. Recommend Actions Taken: m-6-896360544-b 9 of9 WNW 0.12 / 639.91 42.80 / 14 MOBIL-WINTER SPRINGS #731 1205 E STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 dd-STCS-896360544-bb p1p-896360544-y1y Facility ID:9045623 Clnup Cd (OD):ONGO Type:A - Retail Station Fac Clnup Stat (OD):ONGOING Status:Open Clnup Dt (OD):2009/02/17 Status (OD):REVIEWED Status (Map):REVIEWED Fac Stat (OD):OPEN Contam (Map):YES Fac Code (OD):A Fac Type (Map):Retail Station Facility 1:Retail Station Fac Stat (Map):OPEN Fac Name (OD):MOBIL-WINTER SPRINGS #731 Address (OD):1205 E STATE ROAD 434 City (OD):WINTER SPRINGS County (OD):SEMINOLE Zip5 (OD):32708 Name (Map):MOBIL-WINTER SPRINGS #731 Address (Map):1205 E STATE ROAD 434 City (Map):WINTER SPRINGS County (Map):59 Zip4 (Map):2811 Zip5 (Map):32708 Address Line 1:1205 E State Road 434 Address Line 2: City:Winter Springs County:SEMINOLE State:FL Zip:32708- 2811 Report Source:FDEP Geospatial Open Data - Registered Tanks from Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring (STCM) (OD); FDEP Geospatial Open Data - Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring (STCM) (Map); Storage Tank Contaminated Facility Name and Address Search FDEP Storage Tank Monitoring Open Data Details Object ID:32989 Map Src:1994 doqs X:-81.2622195833348 Map Scale:1010 Y:28.6957441111145 Elevation: Regulated:YES El Datum: Col Meth:DPHO El Resolut: Col Name:PERRY_JF59 El Units: Col Date:23-Jul-2003 ALB East:666983.66 Col Prog:TANKS-PETROLEUM CONTAMINATION ALB North:524026.19 6 STCS 145 45 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Ver Meth:DPHO Loc ID:18292 Ver Name:WOEBER_A Lat DD:28 Ver Prog:TANKS-PETROLEUM CONTAMINATION Lat MM:41 Ver Date:09-Jun-2005 Lat SS: OOIC:FACILITY Long DD:81 Rel Feat:EXACT Long MM:15 Datum:HARN Long SS: Coord Acc:4 Col Aff:CONTRACTOR Ver Aff:DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PR Direct: Documents:https://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/electronic-documents/9045623/gis-facility!search FDEP Open Data - Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring (STCM) Loc ID:18292 Rel Feat:EXACT Site Type:Retail Station El Datum: Contam Ind:El Resolut: Phone:8136814279 El Units: Operator:RICK HERWEH Map Src:1994 doqs Next action:PLACARD 21-JUN-2024 Map Scale:1010 Fin Respon:Coord Acc:4 Office:CD Alb East:666983.66 OOIC:FACILITY Alb North:524026.19 Col Meth:DPHO Datum:HARN Col Name:PERRY_JF59 Elevation: Col Date:7/23/2003 Lat DD:28 Col Prog:TANKS-PETROLEUM CONTAMINATION Lat MM:41 Ver Meth:DPHO Lat SS: Ver Name:WOEBER_A Long DD:81 Ver Prog:TANKS-PETROLEUM CONTAMINATION Long MM:15 Ver Date:6/9/2005 Long SS: Object ID:18292 Col Aff:CONTRACTOR Ver Aff:DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PR Documents:https://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/electronic-documents/9045623/gis-facility!search Storage Tank Contaminated Facility Name & Address Search Details Name:Mobil-Winter Springs #731 1205 E State Road 434 Winter Springs, FL 32708- 2811 LL Method:DPHO - Digital Aerial Photography with Ground Control Account Owner:Automated Petroleum & Energy Co Inc (Apec) Contact:Rick Herweh Phone:813-681-4279 District:CD County 1:59 - Seminole Latitude:28:41:44.6788 Longitude:81:15:43.9905 FDEP - Registered Tanks from Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring (STCM) Details Tank No:5 Size:20000 Content:Unleaded Gas Installed:10/01/2008 Placement:UNDER Status:In Service Construction:E - Fiberglass I - Double Wall M - Spill Containment Bucket N - Flow Shut-Off O - Tight Fill Piping:C - Fiberglass F - Double Wall 146 46 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB J - Pressurized Piping System K - Dispenser Liners Monitoring:1 - Continuous Electronic Sensing 2 - Visual Inspect Pipe Sumps 4 - Visual Inspect Dispenser Liners F - Monitor Dbl Wall Tank Space G - Electronic Line Leak Detector K - Monitor Dbl Wall Pipe Space L - Automatic Tank Gauging - Usts FDEP - Registered Tanks from Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring (STCM) Details Tank No:3 Size:10000 Content:Unleaded Gas Installed:11/01/1989 Placement:UNDER Status:Removed from Site Construction: Piping: Monitoring: FDEP - Registered Tanks from Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring (STCM) Details Tank No:6 Size:20000 Content:Vehicular Diesel Installed:10/01/2008 Placement:UNDER Status:In Service Construction:E - Fiberglass I - Double Wall L - Compartmented M - Spill Containment Bucket N - Flow Shut-Off O - Tight Fill Piping:C - Fiberglass F - Double Wall J - Pressurized Piping System K - Dispenser Liners Monitoring:1 - Continuous Electronic Sensing 2 - Visual Inspect Pipe Sumps 4 - Visual Inspect Dispenser Liners F - Monitor Dbl Wall Tank Space G - Electronic Line Leak Detector K - Monitor Dbl Wall Pipe Space L - Automatic Tank Gauging - Usts FDEP - Registered Tanks from Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring (STCM) Details Tank No:1 Size:10000 Content:Unleaded Gas Installed:11/01/1989 Placement:UNDER Status:Removed from Site Construction: Piping: Monitoring: FDEP - Registered Tanks from Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring (STCM) Details Tank No:2 Size:10000 Content:Unleaded Gas 147 47 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Installed:11/01/1989 Placement:UNDER Status:Removed from Site Construction: Piping: Monitoring: FDEP - Registered Tanks from Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring (STCM) Details Tank No:4 Size:10000 Content:Unleaded Gas Installed:11/01/1989 Placement:UNDER Status:Removed from Site Construction: Piping: Monitoring: m-7-810068856-b 1 of1 WNW 0.14 / 720.71 43.05 / 14 FOREIGN CAR PARTS SERVICE 1207 E STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708-2811 dd-RCRA NON GEN-810068856-bb p1p-810068856-y1y EPA Handler ID:FLD981748007 Gen Status Universe:No Report Contact Name:WAYNE NORMAN Contact Address:1207 , E STATE ROAD 434 , , WINTER SPRINGS , FL, 32708-2811 , US Contact Phone No and Ext:305-699-4505 Contact Email: Contact Country:US County Name:SEMINOLE EPA Region:04 Land Type:Private Receive Date:20121019 Location Latitude:28.69765 Location Longitude:-81.325183 Violation/Evaluation Summary Note:NO RECORDS: As of Apr 2024, there are no Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement (violation) records associated with this facility (EPA ID). Handler Summary Importer Activity:No Mixed Waste Generator:No Transporter Activity:No Transfer Facility:No Onsite Burner Exemption:No Furnace Exemption:No Underground Injection Activity:No Commercial TSD:No Used Oil Transporter:No Used Oil Transfer Facility:No Used Oil Processor:No Used Oil Refiner:No Used Oil Burner:No Used Oil Market Burner:No Used Oil Spec Marketer:No Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No:198701 7 RCRA NON GEN 148 48 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Receive Date:19870114 Handler Name:FOREIGN CAR PARTS SERVICE Source Type:Notification Federal Waste Generator Code:2 Generator Code Description:Small Quantity Generator Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No:201210 Receive Date:20121019 Handler Name:FOREIGN CAR PARTS SERVICE Source Type:Implementer Federal Waste Generator Code:N Generator Code Description:Not a Generator, Verified Owner/Operator Details Owner/Operator Ind:Current Owner Street No: Type:Private Street 1:1207 E STATE ROAD 434 Name:NORMAN WAYNE Street 2: Date Became Current:20000925 City:WINTER SPRINGS Date Ended Current:State:FL Phone:Country:US Source Type:Notification Zip Code:32708-2811 Owner/Operator Ind:Current Owner Street No: Type:Private Street 1:1207 E STATE ROAD 434 Name:WAYNE NORMAN Street 2: Date Became Current:20000925 City:WINTER SPRINGS Date Ended Current:State:FL Phone:Country:US Source Type:Implementer Zip Code:32708-2811 Owner/Operator Ind:Current Owner Street No: Type:Private Street 1:1207 E STATE ROAD 434 Name:WAYNE NORMAN Street 2: Date Became Current:20000925 City:WINTER SPRINGS Date Ended Current:State:FL Phone:Country:US Source Type:Notification Zip Code:32708-2811 Historical Handler Details Receive Dt:19870114 Generator Code Description:Small Quantity Generator Handler Name:FOREIGN CAR PARTS SERVICE m-8-813519909-b 1 of1 NW 0.14 / 744.06 41.64 / 13 1212 E. SR 434 DEBRIS STAGING AREA 1212 E. SR 434 WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 dd-SWF/LF-813519909-bb p1p-813519909-y1y Facility ID:98367 District:CD Fac Type (Geodata):Solid Waste Section: Fac Stat (Geodata):Inactive Township: Status Dt (Geodat):2023/01/01 00:00:00+00 Range: Ownership (Geodat):County County ID (Geodat):59 Zip4 (Geodata):County (Geodata):Seminole Zip5 (Geodata):32708 County:SEMINOLE District (Geodata):CD Latitude:28:41:41 Office (Geodata):Longitude:81:15:35 Resp Authority: RA Address: City1: RA State: 8 SWF/LF 149 49 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Zip1: RA Phone No.: RA Email: Site Supervisor: SS Address: City 1: SS State: Zip 1: SS Phone No: SS Email: Land Owner: LO Address: City 2: LO State: Zip 2: LO Phone No: Facility Name (Geodata):1212 E. SR 434 DEBRIS STAGING AREA Address (Geodata):1212 E. SR 434 City (Geodata):Winter Springs Documents (Geodata):https://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/electronic-documents/98367/gis-facility!search Reports (Geodata):https://fldep.dep.state.fl.us/WWW_WACS/Reports/SW_Facility_Inventory_res2.asp?wacsid=98367 Info Portal Facility URL:http://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/facilitysearch?pagination=true&facility.id=98367 Oculus Docs Inventory URL:https://erisservice7.ecologeris.com/ErisExt/flo/ocure.ashx?ID=98367&CAT=8 Data Source:Solid Waste Facility Inventory Report; Florida DEP Geospatial Open Data Class details Class:DISASTER DEBRIS MANAGEMENT SITE Class Status:INACTIVE (I) Solid Waste Facility Inventory Geospatial Open Data Object of Interest:Waste Processing Area Lat DD:28 Accuracy Level:6 Lat MM:41 Accuracy:50 - 999.99 meters Lat SS: QA Status:Not Reviewed Long DD:81 Datum ID:NAD83 Long MM:15 X:667229.674899825 Long SS: Y:523918.139000343 Class:DISASTER DEBRIS MANAGEMENT SITE Class Status:Inactive Proximity ID:Approximate feature location Coord Method ID:Unknown method Solid Waste Facility Inventory Geospatial Open Data Object of Interest:Facility Lat DD:28 Accuracy Level:6 Lat MM:41 Accuracy:50 - 999.99 meters Lat SS: QA Status:Not Reviewed Long DD:81 Datum ID:NAD83 Long MM:15 X:667229.674899825 Long SS: Y:523918.139000343 Class: Class Status: Proximity ID:Approximate feature location Coord Method ID:Unknown method m-9-810067622-b 1 of18 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 38.72 / 10 CENTRAL FLORIDA DRUM INC 2950 RAILROAD AVE OVIEDO FL 32765 dd-RCRA NON GEN-810067622-bb p1p-810067622-y1y EPA Handler ID:FLD032630212 Gen Status Universe:No Report Contact Name:KENNETH PLANTE 9 RCRA NON GEN 150 50 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Contact Address:2950 , RAILRD AVE , , OVIEDO , FL, 32765 , US Contact Phone No and Ext:305-365-3688 Contact Email: Contact Country:US County Name:SEMINOLE EPA Region:04 Land Type:Private Receive Date:19940726 Location Latitude:28.689269 Location Longitude:-81.25924 Violation/Evaluation Summary Note:VIOLATION or UNDETERMINED: There are VIOLATION or UNDETERMINED details or records associated with this facility (EPA ID) in the Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement table dated Apr, 2024. Violation Details Found Violation:Yes Citation:GGR: Violation Short Description:Generators - General Violation Type:262.A Violation Determined Date:19860303 Scheduled Compliance Date: Return to Compliance:Unverifiable Actual Return to Compl:19860331 Violation Responsible Agency:State Enforcement Details Enforcement Type:125 Enforcement Type Description:DEP WARNING LETTER Enforcement Action Date:19860303 Enf Disposition Status: Disposition Status Date: Enforcement Lead Agency:State Proposed Penalty Amount: Final Amount: Paid Amount: Evaluation Details Evaluation Start Date:19860303 Evaluation Type Description:NON-FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEW Violation Short Description:Generators - General Return to Compliance Date:19860331 Evaluation Agency:State Handler Summary Importer Activity:No Mixed Waste Generator:No Transporter Activity:No Transfer Facility:No Onsite Burner Exemption:No Furnace Exemption:No Underground Injection Activity:No Commercial TSD:No Used Oil Transporter:No Used Oil Transfer Facility:No Used Oil Processor:No Used Oil Refiner:No Used Oil Burner:No 151 51 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Used Oil Market Burner:No Used Oil Spec Marketer:No Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No:199407 Receive Date:19940726 Handler Name:CENTRAL FLORIDA DRUM INC Source Type:Notification Federal Waste Generator Code:N Generator Code Description:Not a Generator, Verified Owner/Operator Details Owner/Operator Ind:Current Owner Street No: Type:Private Street 1:2950 RAILROAD AVE Name:KENNETH PLANTE Street 2: Date Became Current:19961018 City:OVIEDO Date Ended Current:State:FL Phone:Country:US Source Type:Notification Zip Code:32765 Owner/Operator Ind:Current Owner Street No: Type:Private Street 1:2950 RAILROAD AVE Name:PLANTE KENNETH Street 2: Date Became Current:19961018 City:OVIEDO Date Ended Current:State:FL Phone:Country:US Source Type:Notification Zip Code:32765 m-9-810074318-b 2 of18 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 38.72 / 10 POLYMETRICS INC 2950 RAILROAD AVE OVIEDO FL 32794 dd-RCRA NON GEN-810074318-bb p1p-810074318-y1y EPA Handler ID:FLD984183426 Gen Status Universe:No Report Contact Name:MARY HORNE Contact Address:PO BOX 1085 , , MAITLAND , FL, 32794 , US Contact Phone No and Ext:407-767-5976 Contact Email: Contact Country:US County Name:SEMINOLE EPA Region:04 Land Type:Private Receive Date:20000812 Location Latitude:28.690086 Location Longitude:-81.259989 Violation/Evaluation Summary Note:NO VIOLATIONS: All of the compliance records associated with this facility (EPA ID) indicate NO VIOLATIONS; Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement table dated Apr, 2024. Evaluation Details Evaluation Start Date:20000812 Evaluation Type Description:NON-FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEW Violation Short Description: Return to Compliance Date: Evaluation Agency:State Evaluation Start Date:19990211 Evaluation Type Description:COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE EVALUATION 9 RCRA NON GEN 152 52 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Violation Short Description: Return to Compliance Date: Evaluation Agency:State Evaluation Start Date:19990112 Evaluation Type Description:COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE EVALUATION Violation Short Description: Return to Compliance Date: Evaluation Agency:State Evaluation Start Date:19980730 Evaluation Type Description:COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE EVALUATION Violation Short Description: Return to Compliance Date: Evaluation Agency:State Evaluation Start Date:19980723 Evaluation Type Description:COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION Violation Short Description: Return to Compliance Date: Evaluation Agency:State Handler Summary Importer Activity:No Mixed Waste Generator:No Transporter Activity:No Transfer Facility:No Onsite Burner Exemption:No Furnace Exemption:No Underground Injection Activity:No Commercial TSD:No Used Oil Transporter:No Used Oil Transfer Facility:No Used Oil Processor:No Used Oil Refiner:No Used Oil Burner:No Used Oil Market Burner:No Used Oil Spec Marketer:No Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No:199011 Receive Date:19901107 Handler Name:POLYMETRICS INC Source Type:Notification Federal Waste Generator Code:2 Generator Code Description:Small Quantity Generator Waste Code Details Hazardous Waste Code:F003 Waste Code Description:THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYL ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS, AND A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. Hazardous Waste Code:F005 Waste Code Description:THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TOLUENE, METHYL ETHYL KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE, BENZENE, 2-ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2-NITROPROPANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS 153 53 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB LISTED IN F001, F002, OR F004; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No:200008 Receive Date:20000812 Handler Name:POLYMETRICS INC Source Type:Implementer Federal Waste Generator Code:N Generator Code Description:Not a Generator, Verified Owner/Operator Details Owner/Operator Ind:Current Owner Street No: Type:Private Street 1:PO BOX 1085 Name:MARY HORNE Street 2: Date Became Current:19990422 City:MAITLAND Date Ended Current:State:FL Phone:Country:US Source Type:Notification Zip Code:32794 Owner/Operator Ind:Current Owner Street No: Type:Private Street 1:PO BOX 1085 Name:MARY HORNE Street 2: Date Became Current:19990422 City:MAITLAND Date Ended Current:State:FL Phone:Country:US Source Type:Implementer Zip Code:32794 Historical Handler Details Receive Dt:19901107 Generator Code Description:Small Quantity Generator Handler Name:POLYMETRICS INC m-9-813542035-b 3 of18 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 38.72 / 10 L D PLANTE INC 2950 RAILROAD AVE OVIEDO FL 32765-8240 dd-LST-813542035-bb p1p-813542035-y1y Facility ID:8520795 Score:26 Facility Status:CLOSED Score Effctve Date:12/21/2004 Facility Type:C - Fuel user/Non-retail Score when Ranked:26 Feature:Facility Name:L D PLANTE INC Method:DPHO Address1:2950 RAILROAD AVE Rank:6627 Address2: Operator:L D PLANTE INC City:OVIEDO Phone:(407)365-3241 State:FL Name Changed:Zip5:32765 Address Changed:Zip4:8240 Prim Related Party:12685 District:CD Primary RP Role:ACCOUNT OWNER County:SEMINOLE RP Begin Date:10/04/1985 County No:59 RP Name:L D PLANTE INC Datum:0 RP Address1:2950 RAILROAD AVE Lat DD:28 RP Address2:Lat MM:41 RP City:OVIEDO Lat SS:22.4273 RP State:FL Long DD:81 RP Zip5:32765 Long MM:15 RP Zip4:8240 Long SS:35.5688 Contact:DON PLANTE Section:006 RP Phone:(407)365-3241 Township:21S RP Phone Ext.:Range:31E RP Bad Addr Ind:No Facility ID (Map):8520795 9 LST 154 54 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Facility Type (Map):Fuel user/Non-retail Facility Status (Map):CLOSED Facility Name (Map):L D PLANTE INC Address (Map):2950 RAILROAD AVE City (Map):OVIEDO Zip5 (Map):32765 County (Map):SEMINOLE Lat DD (Map):28 Lat MM (Map):41 Lat SS (Map): Long DD (Map):81 Long MM (Map):15 Long SS (Map): Datum (Map):HARN Geometry (Map): Rel Feat (Map):CENTR Collection (Map):DPHO Collector (Map):SNYDER_W Collection Date (Map):5/20/2004 Document Link (Map):https://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/electronic-documents/8520795/facility!search Oculus Docs Inventory:https://erisservice7.ecologeris.com/ErisExt/flo/ocure.ashx?ID=8520795&CAT=11 Information Portal Fac URL:http://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/facilitysearch?pagination=true&facility.id=8520795 Information Portal Doc URL:http://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/electronic-documents/8520795/facility!search Source:DEP; Storage Tanks & Contamination Monitoring, Discharge Info.; FDEP Open Data, Petroleum Contamination Monitoring (PCTS) Discharges (Map) Discharge Cleanup Summary Discharge Date:12/31/2002 Cleanup Required:R - CLEANUP REQUIRED Discharge Cleanup Status:NFAC - NO FURTHER ACTION WITH CONDITIONS Discharge Cleanup Stat Date:06/04/2014 Eligibility Indicator:I - INELIGIBLE Site Manager:WHITE_CL Site Manager End Date:05/13/2014 Tank Office:PCLP48 - ORANGE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIV Contaminated Media Contaminated Drinking Wells: Contaminated Mntring Wells: Contaminated Soil: Contaminated Surface Water: Contaminated Ground Water:YES Pollutant:B - Unleaded Gas Other Description:DISCOVERED DURING ASSESSMENT Gallons Discharged: Task Info SA Task ID:81170 SR Soil Treatment: SA Cleanup Resp:-SR Other Treatment: SA Actual Cost:SR Alt Proc Rec: SA Complete Date:RAP Task ID: SA Payment Date:RAP Clean Resp ID:- SR Task ID:RAP Actual Cost: SR Cleanup Resp:-RAP Complete Date: SR Actual Cost:RAP Payment Date: SR Complete Date:RAP Last Ord Appr: SR Payment Date:RA Task ID:78123 SR Oral Date:RA Cleanup Resp:- SR Written Date:RA Yrs to Complete:0 SR Soil Removal:RA Actual Cost: SR Free Prod Rmvl:Tank Office:PCLP48 - Orange County SR Soil Ton Remove: SR Fund Elig Type:- 155 55 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB SA Fund Elig Type:- RAP Fund Elig Type:- RA Fund Elig Type:- SR Alternate Procedure Status: SR Alt Procedure Status Dt: SR Alt Procedure Comment: SRC Action Type:NFAC - NO FURTHER ACTION WITH CONDITIONS SRC Submit Date:6/20/2012 SRC Review Date:07-18-2012 SRC Complete Status:A - APPROVED SRC Comp Status Dt:07-18-2012 SRC Issue Date:06-04-2014 SRC Comments: Petroleum Cleanup PCT Facility Score Related Party ID:12685 RP Contact:DON PLANTE Facility Cleanup Status:CMPL - COMPLETED Bad Address Indicator:N Discharge Info (Map) Discharge:55225 Eligibility:INELIGIBLE Discharge 1:31-Dec-2002 Eligibility 1: Discharge 2:26 Report Pha:COMPLETED Discharge 3:NFAC Report Sub:COMPLETED General Cl:CLOSURE Report S 1:04-Jun-2014 Disch Clea:04-Jun-2014 Staff Assi: Tank Offic:ORANGE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIV AST UST Discharges Dep Co:P Long MM:12 CU Req:R Long SS:28.63 Score:00026 Stat Desc:NO FURTHER ACTION WITH CONDITIONS Descrip:CLEANUP REQUIRED Fac Name:L D PLANTE INC Discharge Date:31-DEC-02 Fac Type:C Score Date:03-JUN-2010 Type Desc:Fuel user/Non-retail Stat Date:04-JUN-2014 Fac Addr:2950 RAILROAD AVE LL Meth:DPHO Fac City:OVIEDO Lat DD:28 Fac Zip:32765 Lat MM:40 County:59 Lat SS:14.93 Fac State:CLOSED Long DD:81 Fac Phone:4073653241 Prg Desc: Ineligible Discharges Discharge Date:12/31/2002 Score:26 Current Status:CLOSED Facility:L D PLANTE INC Address:2950 RAILROAD AVE City:OVIEDO Zip:32765 County:SEMINOLE Owner:L D PLANTE INC Owner Address:2950 RAILROAD AVE Ownercity:OVIEDO Owner State:FL Owner Zip:32765 Owner Phone:(407)365-3241 Owner Email: 156 56 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB m-9-813587799-b 4 of18 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 38.72 / 10 L D PLANTE (BF) 2950 RAILROAD AVE - OVIEDO FL - dd-VCP-813587799-bb p1p-813587799-y1y Eric ID:ERIC_11104 Point Proximity:EXACT System ID:BF590702001 Accuracy:4 System:BROWNFIELD Verification Meth:DPHO Status:CLOSEDWCOND Verification Date:10/11/2005 1:38:54 PM Activity Code:BSRA Latitude Degrees:28 Activity Dt:12/27/2007 Latitude Minutes:41 County:Seminole Latitude Seconds:28.6187 District:CD Longitude Degrees:81 Object of Interest:CAP_R Longitude Minutes:15 Method:DPHO Longitude Seconds:42.1317 Datum:HARN Activity Description:Brownfields Site Rehabilitation Agreement m-9-866248913-b 5 of18 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 38.72 / 10 PLANTE 2950 RAILROAD AVE WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 dd-WELL SURVEILLANCE-866248913-bb p1p-866248913-y1y Facility ID:DEP0086 County:SEMINOLE Project ID:SUPER Longitude:-81.259777 Req No:DC23186 Latitude:28.689453 Loc ID:102247 GPS Date:5/25/2006 0:00:00 GPS ID:102247 Datum: Type:PETROLEUM Software:Risk_Solo_v2 Insp CHD:SEMINOLE Streetside: HAE:-21.55 Agency:DOH Loc Method:GPS - Uncorrected GPS Insp F Name:JOYCE Insp L Name:BITTLE Comment:Was able to gps closer to actual site m-9-866249010-b 6 of18 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 38.72 / 10 L D PLANTE INC 2950 RAILROAD AVE WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 dd-WELL SURVEILLANCE-866249010-bb p1p-866249010-y1y Facility ID:8520795 County:SEMINOLE Project ID:SUPER Longitude:-81.259128 Req No:Latitude:28.688939 Loc ID:204719 GPS Date:11/12/2004 8:11:00 GPS ID:204719 Datum:WS1984 Type:PETROLEUM Software: Insp CHD:SEMINOLE Streetside: HAE:11.2 Agency: Loc Method:DGPS - Differentially Corrected GPS Insp F Name:JIM Insp L Name:COLLINS Comment:TANKS 3 AND 4 m-9-866259446-b 7 of18 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 38.72 / 10 LD PLANTE 2950 RAILROAD AVE OVIEDO FL 32708 dd-WELL SURVEILLANCE-866259446-bb p1p-866259446-y1y Facility ID:DEP 0086 County:SEMINOLE Project ID:SUPER Longitude:-81.256997 Req No:DEP0086 Latitude:28.687418 Loc ID:102255 GPS Date:4/29/2009 0:00:00 GPS ID:102255 Datum: Type:PETROLEUM Software:Risk_Solo_v2 Insp CHD:SEMINOLE Streetside: 9 9 9 9 VCP WELL SURVEILLANCE WELL SURVEILLANCE WELL SURVEILLANCE 157 57 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB HAE:-31.9 Agency:DOH Loc Method:DGPS - Differentially Corrected GPS Insp F Name:JOYCE Insp L Name:BITTLE Comment:Fac. is gated- can not get in. gps gate m-9-874806319-b 8 of18 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 38.72 / 10 L D PLANTE (BF) 2950 RAILROAD AVE OVIEDO FL dd-DWM CONTAM-874806319-bb p1p-874806319-y1y Facility ID:38428 Contact: Site ID:ERIC_11104 Phone: Program Area:Method: Facility Type:Datum: Fac Type:Related Party ID: County ID:59 Primary RP Role: Ftc1 Fac Type ID:RP Begin Date: Stcm Facility Type:FIESTA RP Address1: District:CD RP Address2: Site Status:RP City: Section:RP State: Township:RP Zip5: County:Seminole RP Zip4: Range:RP Phone: Rank:RP Extension: Operator:RP Bad Addr Ind: Name Changed:RP Name: Addr Changed: Facility Name:Polymetrics Inc Description: Program Details Facility Status:Staff Assigned: Offsite Contam:Priority: Priority Score:Score Effective Dt: Project Coordinato:Score When Ranked: Program Eligible:District: Ineligible:Datum:HARN Program Area:BROWNFIELDS Method:DPHO Site Manager:Tracy Jewsbury Lat DD:28 Discharge Date:Lat MM:41 Discharge Eligibil:Lat SS:28.6187 Eligibility Progrm:Long DD:81 Cleanup Status:Closed-ERIC Long MM:15 Closure Type:Long SS:42.1317 Closure Date: Program Details Facility Status:Staff Assigned: Offsite Contam:Priority: Priority Score:Score Effective Dt: Project Coordinato:Score When Ranked: Program Eligible:District: Ineligible:Datum:HARN Program Area:RESPONSPARTY Method:DPHO Site Manager:Tracy Jewsbury Lat DD:28 Discharge Date:Lat MM:41 Discharge Eligibil:Lat SS:28.6187 Eligibility Progrm:Long DD:81 Cleanup Status:Closed-ERIC Long MM:15 Closure Type:Long SS:42.1317 Closure Date: 9 DWM CONTAM 158 58 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB m-9-894358911-b 9 of18 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 38.72 / 10 L D PLANTE INC 2950 RAILROAD AVE OVIEDO FL 32765 dd-UST-894358911-bb p1p-894358911-y1y Facility ID:8520795 County:SEMINOLE Facility Status:CLOSED Lat/Long Method: Facility Type:C Lat DD:28 Type Desc:Fuel user/Non-retail Lat MM:40 Facility Phone:4073653241 Lat SS:14.93 Dep Co:P Long DD:81 Owner ID:12685 Long MM:12 Owner Phone:4073653241 Long SS:28.63 Owner:L D PLANTE INC Owner Address1:2950 RAILROAD AVE Owner Address2: Owner City:OVIEDO Owner State:FL Owner Zip 5:32765 Contact:DON PLANTE Source:Tank Facility - All Locations and Tank Information; Tank Facility - All Locations and Owner Information; Tank Facility - All Locations and Coordinates Information Oculus Docs Inventory URL:https://erisservice7.ecologeris.com/ErisExt/flo/ocure.ashx?ID=8520795&CAT=11 Information Portal Fac URL:http://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/facilitysearch?pagination=true&facility.id=8520795 Information Portal Doc URL:http://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/electronic-documents/8520795/facility!search Tank Information Tank ID:3 Capacity:10000 Tank Status:B - REMOVED FROM SITE Substance:B - Unleaded Gas Status Date:31-DEC-1988 Placement:UNDERGROUND Installation Date:01-JUL-1960 Tank Vessel Indic:TANK Tank Desc: Tank Information Tank ID:4 Capacity:1000 Tank Status:B - REMOVED FROM SITE Substance:D - Vehicular Diesel Status Date:31-DEC-1988 Placement:UNDERGROUND Installation Date:01-JUL-1967 Tank Vessel Indic:TANK Tank Desc: m-9-894396012-b 10 of18 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 38.72 / 10 L D PLANTE INC 2950 RAILROAD AVE OVIEDO FL 32765 dd-AST-894396012-bb p1p-894396012-y1y County Name:Facility ID:8520795 County:SEMINOLE Facility Status:CLOSED Lat/Long Method:Facility Type:C Lat DD:28 Type Desc:Fuel user/Non-retail Lat MM:40 Facility Phone:4073653241 Lat SS:14.93 Dep Co:P Long DD:81 Owner ID:12685 Long MM:12 Owner Phone:4073653241 Long SS:28.63 Owner:L D PLANTE INC Owner Address1:2950 RAILROAD AVE Owner Address2: Owner City:OVIEDO Owner State:FL Owner Zip 5:32765 Contact:DON PLANTE Data Source:Tank Facility - All Locations and Tank Information; Tank Facility - All Locations and Owner Information; Tank Facility - All Locations and Coordinates Information Oculus Docs Inventory URL:https://erisservice7.ecologeris.com/ErisExt/flo/ocure.ashx?ID=8520795&CAT=11 Information Portal Fac URL:http://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/facilitysearch?pagination=true&facility.id=8520795 9 9 UST AST 159 59 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Information Portal Doc URL:http://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/electronic-documents/8520795/facility!search Tank Information Tank ID:2 Install:01-JUL-1974 Status Date:31-DEC-1988 Tank Vessel Indic:TANK Tank Status:B - REMOVED FROM SITE Capacity:20000 Tank Desc:Fac Phone:4073653241 Tank Determin:Fac State:CLOSED Tank Stat:B Place:ABOVEGROUND Fac Type:C Dep Co:P Type Desc:Fuel user/Non-retail Content Code:D Cont Desc:Vehicular Diesel Tank Information Tank ID:1 Install:01-JUL-1974 Status Date:31-DEC-1988 Tank Vessel Indic:TANK Tank Status:B - REMOVED FROM SITE Capacity:10000 Tank Desc:Fac Phone:4073653241 Tank Determin:Fac State:CLOSED Tank Stat:B Place:ABOVEGROUND Fac Type:C Dep Co:P Type Desc:Fuel user/Non-retail Content Code:D Cont Desc:Vehicular Diesel m-9-894771195-b 11 of18 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 38.72 / 10 Polymetrics Inc 2950 RAILROAD AVE OVIEDO FL 0 dd-ERIC-894771195-bb p1p-894771195-y1y Eric ID:ERIC_11104 Offste Contami Key:CONTAMNOSCHOOL Site Status:CLOSEDWCOND Se Anno Cad Data: Source Facility ID:38428 State:FL District:CD County Name:Seminole WMD:SJRWMD County ID:59 ICR Indicator:NO Datum ID:HARN Discharge Date:Geometry: Method ID:DPHO X:-81.2617032653299 Object of Interest:CAP_R Y:28.6912829371314 Proximit to Object:EXACT Lat DD:28 Collector Username:GRANDE_M Lat MM:41 Collect Date:Lat SS: Map Source:1999 doqs Long DD:81 Map Source Scale:5000 Long MM:15 Intrpolation Scale:0 Long SS: Coord Accuracy ID:4 Gis Albx:667045.0 Site Phase Dsc:Phase 5 - Cleanup Complete Gis Alby:523532.0 Site Name:L D PLANTE (BF) Documents:https://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/electronic-documents/ERIC_11104/gis-facility!search Program Details Program:Petroleum Restoration Program Program Type:PETROLEUM Program Status:COMPLETEWITHCOND Site Manager:Tracy Jewsbury Program Details Program:Brownfield Site Rehabilitation Program Type:BROWNFIELDS 9 ERIC 160 60 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Program Status:COMPLETEWITHCOND Site Manager:Tracy Jewsbury Program Details Program:Responsible Party Cleanup Program Type:RESPONSPARTY Program Status:COMPLETEWITHCOND Site Manager:Tracy Jewsbury m-9-894773183-b 12 of18 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 38.72 / 10 L D PLANTE INC 2950 RAILROAD AVENUE OVIEDO FL 32765 dd-ERIC-894773183-bb p1p-894773183-y1y Eric ID:ERIC_7080 Offste Contami Key:CONTAMUNKNOWN Site Status:CLOSEDWCOND Se Anno Cad Data: Source Facility ID:8520795 State:FL District:CD County Name:Seminole WMD:SJRWMD County ID:59 ICR Indicator:YES Datum ID:HARN Discharge Date:Geometry: Method ID:DPHO X:-81.2598768375852 Object of Interest:FACIL Y:28.6895638338426 Proximit to Object:CENTR Lat DD:28 Collector Username:ERIC_ICR_INIT_LOAD Lat MM:41 Collect Date:5/20/2004 Lat SS: Map Source:1999 doqs Long DD:81 Map Source Scale:5000 Long MM:15 Intrpolation Scale:0 Long SS: Coord Accuracy ID:3 Gis Albx:667227.33 Site Phase Dsc:Phase 4 - Design Implementation Gis Alby:523345.09 Site Name:L.D.PLANTE Documents:https://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/electronic-documents/ERIC_7080/gis-facility!search Program Details Program:Brownfield Site Rehabilitation Program Type:BROWNFIELDS Program Status:COMPLETEWITHCOND Site Manager: Program Details Program:Petroleum Restoration Program Program Type:PETROLEUM Program Status:COMPLETEWITHCOND Site Manager: m-9-895374564-b 13 of18 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 38.72 / 10 L.D.PLANTE 2950 RAILROAD AVENUE OVIEDO FL dd-DWM CONTAM-895374564-bb p1p-895374564-y1y Facility ID:Contact: Site ID:ERIC_7080 Phone: Program Area:Method: Facility Type:Datum: Fac Type:Related Party ID: County ID:Primary RP Role: Ftc1 Fac Type ID:RP Begin Date: Stcm Facility Type:RP Address1: District:CD RP Address2: Site Status:Open RP City: Section:RP State: Township:RP Zip5: 9 9 ERIC DWM CONTAM 161 61 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB County:Seminole RP Zip4: Range:RP Phone: Rank:RP Extension: Operator:RP Bad Addr Ind: Name Changed:RP Name: Addr Changed: Facility Name: Description: Program Details Facility Status:Staff Assigned: Offsite Contam:Priority: Priority Score:Score Effective Dt: Project Coordinato:Score When Ranked: Program Eligible:District: Ineligible:Datum:HARN Program Area:BROWNFIELDS Method:DPHO Site Manager:Christopher A. Williams Lat DD:28 Discharge Date:Lat MM:41 Discharge Eligibil:Lat SS:22.4273 Eligibility Progrm:Long DD:81 Cleanup Status:Long MM:15 Closure Type:Long SS:35.5688 Closure Date: Program Details Facility Status:Staff Assigned: Offsite Contam:Priority: Priority Score:Score Effective Dt: Project Coordinato:Score When Ranked: Program Eligible:District: Ineligible:Datum:HARN Program Area:BROWNFIELDS Method:DPHO Site Manager:Lat DD:28 Discharge Date:WILLIAM B YEOMANS JR Lat MM:41 Discharge Eligibil:(315)372-3722 Lat SS:22.4273 Eligibility Progrm:1/29/2019 Long DD:81 Cleanup Status:Long MM:15 Closure Type:Long SS:35.5688 Closure Date: m-9-896316434-b 14 of18 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 38.72 / 10 L D PLANTE INC 2950 RAILROAD AVE OVIEDO FL 32765 dd-STCS-896316434-bb p1p-896316434-y1y Facility ID:8520795 Clnup Cd (OD):CMPL Type:C - Fuel User/Non-Retail Fac Clnup Stat (OD):COMPLETED Status:Closed Clnup Dt (OD):2014/06/18 Status (OD):REVIEWED Status (Map):REVIEWED Fac Stat (OD):CLOSED Contam (Map): Fac Code (OD):C Fac Type (Map):Fuel user/Non-retail Facility 1:Fuel user/Non-retail Fac Stat (Map):CLOSED Fac Name (OD):L D PLANTE INC Address (OD):2950 RAILROAD AVE City (OD):OVIEDO County (OD):SEMINOLE Zip5 (OD):32765 Name (Map):L D PLANTE INC Address (Map):2950 RAILROAD AVE City (Map):OVIEDO County (Map):59 Zip4 (Map):8240 Zip5 (Map):32765 Address Line 1:2950 Railroad Ave 9 STCS 162 62 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Address Line 2: City:Oviedo County:SEMINOLE State:FL Zip:32765- 8240 Report Source:FDEP Geospatial Open Data - Registered Tanks from Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring (STCM) (OD); FDEP Geospatial Open Data - Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring (STCM) (Map); Storage Tank Contaminated Facility Name and Address Search FDEP Storage Tank Monitoring Open Data Details Object ID:9772 Map Src:1999 doqs X:-81.2598802222244 Map Scale:5000 Y:28.6895631388922 Elevation: Regulated:NO El Datum: Col Meth:DPHO El Resolut: Col Name:SNYDER_W El Units: Col Date:20-May-2004 ALB East:667227.33 Col Prog:TANKS-PETROLEUM CONTAMINATION ALB North:523345.09 Ver Meth:DPHO Loc ID:18599 Ver Name:WOEBER_A Lat DD:28 Ver Prog:TANKS-PETROLEUM CONTAMINATION Lat MM:41 Ver Date:07-Jun-2005 Lat SS: OOIC:FACILITY Long DD:81 Rel Feat:CENTR Long MM:15 Datum:HARN Long SS: Coord Acc:3 Col Aff:DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Ver Aff:DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PR Direct: Documents:https://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/electronic-documents/8520795/gis-facility!search FDEP Open Data - Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring (STCM) Loc ID:18599 Rel Feat:CENTR Site Type:Fuel user/Non-retail El Datum: Contam Ind:El Resolut: Phone:4073653241 El Units: Operator:L D PLANTE INC Map Src:1999 doqs Next action:Map Scale:5000 Fin Respon:Coord Acc:3 Office:CD Alb East:667227.33 OOIC:FACILITY Alb North:523345.09 Col Meth:DPHO Datum:HARN Col Name:SNYDER_W Elevation: Col Date:5/20/2004 Lat DD:28 Col Prog:TANKS-PETROLEUM CONTAMINATION Lat MM:41 Ver Meth:DPHO Lat SS: Ver Name:WOEBER_A Long DD:81 Ver Prog:TANKS-PETROLEUM CONTAMINATION Long MM:15 Ver Date:6/7/2005 Long SS: Object ID:18599 Col Aff:DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Ver Aff:DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PR Documents:https://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/electronic-documents/8520795/gis-facility!search Storage Tank Contaminated Facility Name & Address Search Details Name:L D Plante Inc 2950 Railroad Ave Oviedo, FL 32765- 8240 LL Method:DPHO - Digital Aerial Photography with Ground Control Account Owner:L D Plante Inc Contact:L D Plante Inc Phone:407-365-3241 District:CD 163 63 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB County 1:59 - Seminole Latitude:28:41:22.4273 Longitude:81:15:35.5688 FDEP - Registered Tanks from Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring (STCM) Details Tank No:1 Size:10000 Content:Vehicular Diesel Installed:07/01/1974 Placement:ABOVE Status:Removed from Site Construction: Piping: Monitoring: FDEP - Registered Tanks from Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring (STCM) Details Tank No:2 Size:20000 Content:Vehicular Diesel Installed:07/01/1974 Placement:ABOVE Status:Removed from Site Construction: Piping: Monitoring: FDEP - Registered Tanks from Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring (STCM) Details Tank No:3 Size:10000 Content:Unleaded Gas Installed:07/01/1960 Placement:UNDER Status:Removed from Site Construction: Piping: Monitoring: FDEP - Registered Tanks from Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring (STCM) Details Tank No:4 Size:1000 Content:Vehicular Diesel Installed:07/01/1967 Placement:UNDER Status:Removed from Site Construction: Piping: Monitoring: m-9-902433393-b 15 of18 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 38.72 / 10 L D PLANTE (BF) 2950 RAILROAD AVE - OVIEDO FL - dd-VCP-902433393-bb p1p-902433393-y1y Eric ID:ERIC_11104 Point Proximity:EXACT System ID:BF590702000 Accuracy:4 System:BROWNFIELD Verification Meth:DPHO Status:CLOSEDWCOND Verification Date:10/11/2005 1:38:54 PM Activity Code:BSRA Latitude Degrees:28 Activity Dt:12/27/2007 Latitude Minutes:41 County:Seminole Latitude Seconds:28.6187 9 VCP 164 64 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB District:CD Longitude Degrees:81 Object of Interest:CAP_R Longitude Minutes:15 Method:DPHO Longitude Seconds:42.1317 Datum:HARN Activity Description:Brownfields Site Rehabilitation Agreement m-9-902949434-b 16 of18 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 38.72 / 10 L D PLANTE INC 2950 RAILROAD AVE OVIEDO FL 32765 dd-DWM CONTAM-902949434-bb p1p-902949434-y1y Facility ID:8520795 Contact: Site ID:8520795 Phone: Program Area:Method: Facility Type:Datum: Fac Type:Related Party ID: County ID:59 Primary RP Role: Ftc1 Fac Type ID:C RP Begin Date: Stcm Facility Type:C RP Address1: District:CD RP Address2: Site Status:RP City: Section:6 RP State: Township:21S RP Zip5: County:Seminole RP Zip4: Range:31E RP Phone: Rank:RP Extension: Operator:RP Bad Addr Ind: Name Changed:RP Name: Addr Changed: Facility Name:L D PLANTE INC Description:Fuel user/Non-retail Program Details Facility Status:Staff Assigned: Offsite Contam:Priority: Priority Score:26 Score Effective Dt: Project Coordinato:Score When Ranked: Program Eligible:District: Ineligible:Datum:0 Program Area:PETROLEUM Method:DPHO Site Manager:Lat DD:28 Discharge Date:12/31/2002 Lat MM:40 Discharge Eligibil:I Lat SS:14.93 Eligibility Progrm:Long DD:81 Cleanup Status:CLOSED-STCM Long MM:12 Closure Type:NFAC Long SS:28.63 Closure Date:6/4/2014 m-9-923853834-b 17 of18 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 38.72 / 10 L D PLANTE (BF) 2950 RAILROAD AVE - OVIEDO FL - dd-VCP-923853834-bb p1p-923853834-y1y Eric ID:ERIC_11104 Point Proximity:EXACT System ID:149079 Accuracy:4 System:COMET Verification Meth:DPHO Status:CLOSEDWCOND Verification Date:10/11/2005 1:38:54 PM Activity Code:BSRA Latitude Degrees:28 Activity Dt:12/27/2007 Latitude Minutes:41 County:Seminole Latitude Seconds:28.6187 District:CD Longitude Degrees:81 Object of Interest:CAP_R Longitude Minutes:15 Method:DPHO Longitude Seconds:42.1317 Datum:HARN Activity Description:Brownfields Site Rehabilitation Agreement 9 9 DWM CONTAM VCP 165 65 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB m-9-923854179-b 18 of18 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 38.72 / 10 L D PLANTE (BF) 2950 RAILROAD AVE - OVIEDO FL - dd-VCP-923854179-bb p1p-923854179-y1y Eric ID:ERIC_11104 Point Proximity:EXACT System ID:8520795 Accuracy:4 System:STCM Verification Meth:DPHO Status:CLOSEDWCOND Verification Date:10/11/2005 1:38:54 PM Activity Code:BSRA Latitude Degrees:28 Activity Dt:12/27/2007 Latitude Minutes:41 County:Seminole Latitude Seconds:28.6187 District:CD Longitude Degrees:81 Object of Interest:CAP_R Longitude Minutes:15 Method:DPHO Longitude Seconds:42.1317 Datum:HARN Activity Description:Brownfields Site Rehabilitation Agreement m-10-813588067-b 1 of1 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 38.72 / 10 Former Central Florida Drum Facility 2950 (M-1 Zoning Area Only) and 2960 Railroad Avenue WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 dd-BROWNFIELDS-813588067-bb p1p-813588067-y1y Site ID:BF590702001 CCD1 City ID:4905 Area ID:BF590702000 CC2 County ID:59 Remediation:AWAITING CLEANUP County:SEMINOLE Acreage:6.158711 DDC Dep District ID:CD SRCO Date:03-MAY-19 12.00.00.000000 AM District:Central BSRA Date:27-DEC-07 12.00.00.000000 AM Latitude:28.68969728 X Coordinate NBR:667217.0221 Longitude:-81.25983692 Y Coordinate NBR:523396.5232 Lat DD:28 Shape Area:24923.37804306 Lat MM:41 Shape Length:1139.95164134 Lat SS:24.1246 Method:PAPER Long DD:-81 CMC2 Verif Method:DPHO Long MM:15 Verification Date:17-JAN-08 12.00.00.000000 AM Long SS:35.8967 Date Stamp:20-DEC-07 12.00.00.000000 AM Username:CLARKE_C Source:Seminole County Area Name:Former Central Florida Drum Facility Documents:https://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/electronic-documents/BF590702001/gis-facility!search Comment:aka L.D. Plante, Inc. Oculus Docs Inventory Url:https://erisservice7.ecologeris.com/ErisExt/flo/ocure.ashx?ID=BF590702001&CAT=5 Information Portal Facility Url:http://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/facilitysearch?pagination=true&facility.id=BF590702001 m-11-821735646-b 1 of1 SSW 0.17 / 887.66 38.72 / 10 Former Central Florida Drum Facility WINTER SPRINGS FL dd-BROWNFIELD AREA-821735646-bb p1p-821735646-y1y Area ID:BF590702000 Latitude:28.68969727 User Name:CLARKE_C Longitude:-81.25983692 Method:PAPER Latitude Degrees:28 County:SEMINOLE Latitude Minutes:41 District:Central Latitude Seconds:22.91018964 Acreage:6.15871 Longitude Degrees:-81 Resolution No:2007-R-233 Longitude Minutes:15 Resolution Date:11-DEC-07 12.00.00.000000 AM Longitude Seconds:35.41292064 Shape Area:X Coordinate:667230.8907127 Shape Length:Y Coordinate:523359.9865243 Date Stamp:20-DEC-07 12.00.00.000000 AM Source:Seminole County Documents:https://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/electronic-documents/BF590702000/gis-facility!search 9 10 11 VCP BROWNFIELDS BROWNFIELD AREA 166 66 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB m-12-813540753-b 1 of7 WNW 0.23 / 1,208.67 44.56 / 16 HANDY WAY FOOD STORE #3333 170 TUSCAWILLA RD WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708-3715 dd-LST-813540753-bb p1p-813540753-y1y Facility ID:8516641 Score:56 Facility Status:CLOSED Score Effctve Date:02/01/2013 Facility Type:A - Retail Station Score when Ranked:76 Feature:Facility Name:HANDY WAY FOOD STORE #3333 Method:DPHO Address1:170 TUSCAWILLA RD Rank:556 Address2: Operator:BRENT PUZAK City:WINTER SPRINGS Phone:(904)327-1217 State:FL Name Changed:Zip5:32708 Address Changed:08/29/2000 Zip4:3715 Prim Related Party:10563 District:CD Primary RP Role:ACCOUNT OWNER County:SEMINOLE RP Begin Date:05/03/1999 County No:59 RP Name:THE PANTRY INC Datum:0 RP Address1:305 Gregson Dr Lat DD:28 RP Address2:ATTN: STORAGE TANK REGIS Lat MM:41 RP City:Cary Lat SS:47.7907 RP State:NC Long DD:81 RP Zip5:27511 Long MM:15 RP Zip4:6496 Long SS:47.2791 Contact:BRENT PUZAK | RAMON INCIONG (386) 916-6267 Section:036 RP Phone:(919)774-6700 Township:020 RP Phone Ext.:6549 Range:030 RP Bad Addr Ind:No Facility ID (Map):8516641 Facility Type (Map):Retail Station Facility Status (Map):CLOSED Facility Name (Map):HANDY WAY FOOD STORE #3333 Address (Map):170 TUSCAWILLA RD City (Map):WINTER SPRINGS Zip5 (Map):32708 County (Map):SEMINOLE Lat DD (Map):28 Lat MM (Map):41 Lat SS (Map): Long DD (Map):81 Long MM (Map):15 Long SS (Map): Datum (Map):HARN Geometry (Map): Rel Feat (Map):EXACT Collection (Map):DPHO Collector (Map):PERRY_JF59 Collection Date (Map):10/14/2003 Document Link (Map):https://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/electronic-documents/8516641/facility!search Oculus Docs Inventory:https://erisservice7.ecologeris.com/ErisExt/flo/ocure.ashx?ID=8516641&CAT=11 Information Portal Fac URL:http://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/facilitysearch?pagination=true&facility.id=8516641 Information Portal Doc URL:http://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/electronic-documents/8516641/facility!search Source:DEP; Storage Tanks & Contamination Monitoring, Discharge Info.; FDEP Open Data, Petroleum Contamination Monitoring (PCTS) Discharges (Map) Discharge Cleanup Summary Discharge Date:08/07/2000 Cleanup Required:R - CLEANUP REQUIRED Discharge Cleanup Status:NFA - NFA COMPLETE Discharge Cleanup Stat Date:10/02/2013 Eligibility Indicator:E - ELIGIBLE Site Manager:PRESS_DM Site Manager End Date:09/10/2013 Tank Office:PCLP48 - ORANGE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIV 12 LST 167 67 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Contaminated Media Contaminated Drinking Wells: Contaminated Mntring Wells: Contaminated Soil: Contaminated Surface Water: Contaminated Ground Water:YES Pollutant:B - Unleaded Gas Other Description: Gallons Discharged: Petroleum Cleanup Program Eligibility Cleanup Program:S - SITE REHABILITATION FUNDING AGREEMENT Eligibility Status:NOT ELIGIBLE Task Info SA Task ID:91160 SR Soil Treatment: SA Cleanup Resp:-SR Other Treatment: SA Actual Cost:SR Alt Proc Rec: SA Complete Date:RAP Task ID: SA Payment Date:RAP Clean Resp ID:- SR Task ID:RAP Actual Cost: SR Cleanup Resp:-RAP Complete Date: SR Actual Cost:RAP Payment Date: SR Complete Date:RAP Last Ord Appr: SR Payment Date:RA Task ID:90612 SR Oral Date:RA Cleanup Resp:ST - STATE SR Written Date:RA Yrs to Complete:0 SR Soil Removal:RA Actual Cost: SR Free Prod Rmvl:Tank Office:PCLP48 - Orange County SR Soil Ton Remove: SR Fund Elig Type:- SA Fund Elig Type:- RAP Fund Elig Type:- RA Fund Elig Type:- SR Alternate Procedure Status: SR Alt Procedure Status Dt: SR Alt Procedure Comment: SRC Action Type:NFA - NO FURTHER ACTION SRC Submit Date:6/19/2013 SRC Review Date:07-10-2013 SRC Complete Status:A - APPROVED SRC Comp Status Dt:07-10-2013 SRC Issue Date:10-02-2013 SRC Comments: Discharge Cleanup Summary Discharge Date:09/28/1987 Cleanup Required:R - CLEANUP REQUIRED Discharge Cleanup Status:NFA - NFA COMPLETE Discharge Cleanup Stat Date:10/02/2013 Eligibility Indicator:E - ELIGIBLE Site Manager:PRESS_DM Site Manager End Date:09/10/2013 Tank Office:PCLP48 - ORANGE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIV Contaminated Media Contaminated Drinking Wells:0 168 68 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Contaminated Mntring Wells:NO Contaminated Soil:YES Contaminated Surface Water:NO Contaminated Ground Water:YES Pollutant:A - Leaded Gas Other Description: Gallons Discharged: Petroleum Cleanup Program Eligibility Cleanup Program:E - EARLY DETECTION INCENTIVE Eligibility Status:ELIGIBLE Task Info SA Task ID:23272 SR Soil Treatment:Yes SA Cleanup Resp:RP - RESPONSIBLE PARTY SR Other Treatment: SA Actual Cost:SR Alt Proc Rec: SA Complete Date:01-17-1997 RAP Task ID:23273 SA Payment Date:RAP Clean Resp ID:RP - RESPONSIBLE PARTY SR Task ID:23271 RAP Actual Cost: SR Cleanup Resp:RP - RESPONSIBLE PARTY RAP Complete Date: SR Actual Cost:RAP Payment Date: SR Complete Date:RAP Last Ord Appr: SR Payment Date:RA Task ID:23274 SR Oral Date:RA Cleanup Resp:ST - STATE SR Written Date:RA Yrs to Complete:0 SR Soil Removal:Yes RA Actual Cost: SR Free Prod Rmvl:Tank Office:PCLP48 - Orange County SR Soil Ton Remove: SR Fund Elig Type:- SA Fund Elig Type:- RAP Fund Elig Type:- RA Fund Elig Type:- SR Alternate Procedure Status: SR Alt Procedure Status Dt: SR Alt Procedure Comment: SRC Action Type:NFA - NO FURTHER ACTION SRC Submit Date:6/19/2013 SRC Review Date:07-10-2013 SRC Complete Status:A - APPROVED SRC Comp Status Dt:07-10-2013 SRC Issue Date:10-02-2013 SRC Comments: Petroleum Cleanup Funding Cap Encumbrance to Date FCFS:$94,480.23 LPSPASM:$0.00 SPASM:$0.00 NPDES:$0.00 Utility 1 Time Payments:$0.00 All Wo Ta Co Pos Encumbered:$121,908.70 Wo Ta Co Pos Exclu from Cap:$0.00 Ttl Amnt Encumbered to Date:$216,388.93 Ttl Amnt Encumbered Towar:$216,388.93 Petroleum Cleanup PCT Facility Score Related Party ID:10563 RP Contact:BRENT PUZAK | RAMON INCIONG (386) 916-6267 Facility Cleanup Status:CMPL - COMPLETED Bad Address Indicator:N 169 69 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Discharge Info (Map) Discharge:53111 Eligibility:ELIGIBLE Discharge 1:07-Aug-2000 Eligibility 1:SRFA Discharge 2:56 Report Pha:COMPLETED Discharge 3:NFA Report Sub:COMPLETED General Cl:CLOSURE Report S 1:02-Oct-2013 Disch Clea:02-Oct-2013 Staff Assi: Tank Offic:ORANGE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIV Discharge Info (Map) Discharge:9778 Eligibility:ELIGIBLE Discharge 1:28-Sep-1987 Eligibility 1:EDI Discharge 2:56 Report Pha:COMPLETED Discharge 3:NFA Report Sub:COMPLETED General Cl:CLOSURE Report S 1:02-Oct-2013 Disch Clea:02-Oct-2013 Staff Assi: Tank Offic:ORANGE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIV AST UST Discharges Dep Co:P Long MM:15 CU Req:R Long SS:47.02 Score:00056 Stat Desc:NFA COMPLETE Descrip:CLEANUP REQUIRED Fac Name:HANDY WAY FOOD STORE #3333 Discharge Date:28-SEP-87 Fac Type:A Score Date:01-FEB-2013 Type Desc:Retail Station Stat Date:02-OCT-2013 Fac Addr:170 TUSCAWILLA RD LL Meth:DPHO Fac City:WINTER SPRINGS Lat DD:28 Fac Zip:32708 Lat MM:41 County:59 Lat SS:47.98 Fac State:CLOSED Long DD:81 Fac Phone:9043271217 Prg Desc:EARLY DETECTION INCENTIVE AST UST Discharges Dep Co:P Long MM:15 CU Req:R Long SS:47.02 Score:00056 Stat Desc:NFA COMPLETE Descrip:CLEANUP REQUIRED Fac Name:HANDY WAY FOOD STORE #3333 Discharge Date:07-AUG-00 Fac Type:A Score Date:01-FEB-2013 Type Desc:Retail Station Stat Date:02-OCT-2013 Fac Addr:170 TUSCAWILLA RD LL Meth:DPHO Fac City:WINTER SPRINGS Lat DD:28 Fac Zip:32708 Lat MM:41 County:59 Lat SS:47.98 Fac State:CLOSED Long DD:81 Fac Phone:9043271217 Prg Desc:SITE REHABILITATION FUNDING AGREEMENT Eligible Discharges Program:SRFA Current Status:CLOSED Discharge Date:08/07/2000 Score:56 Facility:HANDY WAY FOOD STORE #3333 Address:170 TUSCAWILLA RD City:WINTER SPRINGS Zip:32708 County:SEMINOLE 170 70 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Owner:THE PANTRY INC Owner Address:305 Gregson Dr Owner City:Cary Owner State:NC Owner Zip:27511 Owner Phone:(919)774-6700 Owner Email:GBIGGS@CIRCLEK.COM Eligible Discharges Program:EDI Current Status:CLOSED Discharge Date:09/28/1987 Score:56 Facility:HANDY WAY FOOD STORE #3333 Address:170 TUSCAWILLA RD City:WINTER SPRINGS Zip:32708 County:SEMINOLE Owner:THE PANTRY INC Owner Address:305 Gregson Dr Owner City:Cary Owner State:NC Owner Zip:27511 Owner Phone:(919)774-6700 Owner Email:GBIGGS@CIRCLEK.COM m-12-822758487-b 2 of7 WNW 0.23 / 1,208.67 44.56 / 16 HANDY WAY FOOD STORE #3333 170 TUSCAWILLA RD WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 dd-DEL CONTAM SITE-822758487-bb p1p-822758487-y1y Prgm Site ID:8516641 Record Date: Remedi Status:ACTIVE County:SEMINOLE Priority Score:76 Method:DPHO Program Area:Petroleum Datum:HARN Program Eligible:Y Lat DD:28 Ineligible:Lat MM:41 Offsite Contam:N Lat SS:47.7907 Dt Known Offsite:Long DD:81 Proj Manager:SCHMIDT_JD Long MM:15 Office District:PCLP59 Long SS:47.2791 Original Source:CS Record Date:31-MAR-2015 m-12-866244026-b 3 of7 WNW 0.23 / 1,208.67 44.56 / 16 HANDYWAY 170 TUSKAWILLA RD WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 dd-WELL SURVEILLANCE-866244026-bb p1p-866244026-y1y Facility ID:8516641 County:SEMINOLE Project ID:SUPER Longitude:-81.263043 Req No:RE41525 Latitude:28.69654 Loc ID:181829 GPS Date:2/23/2007 0:00:00 GPS ID:181829 Datum:WS1984 Type:PETROLEUM Software:Risk_Solo_v2 Insp CHD:SEMINOLE Streetside: HAE:-19.88 Agency:DOH Loc Method:GPS - Uncorrected GPS Insp F Name:JOYCE Insp L Name:BITTLE Comment: m-12-874809453-b 4 of7 WNW 0.23 / 1,208.67 44.56 / 16 HANDY WAY FOOD STORE #3333 170 TUSCAWILLA RD dd-DWM CONTAM-874809453-bb p1p-874809453-y1y 12 12 12 DEL CONTAM SITE WELL SURVEILLANCE DWM CONTAM 171 71 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 Facility ID:8516641 Contact: Site ID:Phone: Program Area:Petroleum Method: Facility Type:Datum: Fac Type:Related Party ID: County ID:Primary RP Role: Ftc1 Fac Type ID:RP Begin Date: Stcm Facility Type:RP Address1: District:RP Address2: Site Status:RP City: Section:RP State: Township:RP Zip5: County:SEMINOLE RP Zip4: Range:RP Phone: Rank:RP Extension: Operator:RP Bad Addr Ind: Name Changed:RP Name: Addr Changed: Facility Name: Description: Program Details Facility Status:ACTIVE Staff Assigned: Offsite Contam:N Priority: Priority Score:76 Score Effective Dt: Project Coordinato:SCHMIDT_JD Score When Ranked: Program Eligible:Y District:PCLP59 Ineligible:Datum:HARN Program Area:Method:DPHO Site Manager:Lat DD:28 Discharge Date:Lat MM:41 Discharge Eligibil:Lat SS:47.7907 Eligibility Progrm:Long DD:81 Cleanup Status:Long MM:15 Closure Type:Long SS:47.2791 Closure Date: m-12-894361060-b 5 of7 WNW 0.23 / 1,208.67 44.56 / 16 HANDY WAY FOOD STORE #3333 170 TUSCAWILLA RD WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 dd-UST-894361060-bb p1p-894361060-y1y Facility ID:8516641 County:SEMINOLE Facility Status:CLOSED Lat/Long Method: Facility Type:A Lat DD:28 Type Desc:Retail Station Lat MM:41 Facility Phone:9043271217 Lat SS:47.98 Dep Co:P Long DD:81 Owner ID:10563 Long MM:15 Owner Phone:9197746700 Long SS:47.02 Owner:THE PANTRY INC Owner Address1:305 Gregson Dr Owner Address2:ATTN: STORAGE TANK REGIS Owner City:Cary Owner State:NC Owner Zip 5:27511 Contact:BRENT PUZAK | RAMON INCIONG (386) 916-6267 Source:Tank Facility - All Locations and Tank Information; Tank Facility - All Locations and Owner Information; Tank Facility - All Locations and Coordinates Information Oculus Docs Inventory URL:https://erisservice7.ecologeris.com/ErisExt/flo/ocure.ashx?ID=8516641&CAT=11 Information Portal Fac URL:http://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/facilitysearch?pagination=true&facility.id=8516641 Information Portal Doc URL:http://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/electronic-documents/8516641/facility!search 12 UST 172 72 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Tank Information Tank ID:2 Capacity:10000 Tank Status:B - REMOVED FROM SITE Substance:B - Unleaded Gas Status Date:27-MAR-1995 Placement:UNDERGROUND Installation Date:01-MAY-1982 Tank Vessel Indic:TANK Tank Desc: Tank Information Tank ID:3 Capacity:12000 Tank Status:B - REMOVED FROM SITE Substance:B - Unleaded Gas Status Date:01-JUL-2000 Placement:UNDERGROUND Installation Date:01-APR-1995 Tank Vessel Indic:TANK Tank Desc: Tank Information Tank ID:1 Capacity:10000 Tank Status:B - REMOVED FROM SITE Substance:B - Unleaded Gas Status Date:27-MAR-1995 Placement:UNDERGROUND Installation Date:01-MAY-1982 Tank Vessel Indic:TANK Tank Desc: Tank Information Tank ID:5 Capacity:10000 Tank Status:B - REMOVED FROM SITE Substance:B - Unleaded Gas Status Date:01-JUL-2000 Placement:UNDERGROUND Installation Date:01-APR-1995 Tank Vessel Indic:TANK Tank Desc: Tank Information Tank ID:4 Capacity:10000 Tank Status:B - REMOVED FROM SITE Substance:B - Unleaded Gas Status Date:27-MAR-1995 Placement:UNDERGROUND Installation Date:01-MAY-1982 Tank Vessel Indic:TANK Tank Desc: m-12-896357211-b 6 of7 WNW 0.23 / 1,208.67 44.56 / 16 HANDY WAY FOOD STORE #3333 170 TUSCAWILLA RD WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 dd-STCS-896357211-bb p1p-896357211-y1y Facility ID:8516641 Clnup Cd (OD):CMPL Type:A - Retail Station Fac Clnup Stat (OD):COMPLETED Status:Closed Clnup Dt (OD):2014/03/23 Status (OD):REVIEWED Status (Map):REVIEWED Fac Stat (OD):CLOSED Contam (Map): Fac Code (OD):A Fac Type (Map):Retail Station Facility 1:Retail Station Fac Stat (Map):CLOSED Fac Name (OD):HANDY WAY FOOD STORE #3333 Address (OD):170 TUSCAWILLA RD City (OD):WINTER SPRINGS County (OD):SEMINOLE Zip5 (OD):32708 Name (Map):HANDY WAY FOOD STORE #3333 Address (Map):170 TUSCAWILLA RD City (Map):WINTER SPRINGS County (Map):59 Zip4 (Map):3715 Zip5 (Map):32708 Address Line 1:170 Tuscawilla Rd 12 STCS 173 73 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Address Line 2: City:Winter Springs County:SEMINOLE State:FL Zip:32708- 3715 Report Source:FDEP Geospatial Open Data - Registered Tanks from Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring (STCM) (OD); FDEP Geospatial Open Data - Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring (STCM) (Map); Storage Tank Contaminated Facility Name and Address Search FDEP Storage Tank Monitoring Open Data Details Object ID:8015 Map Src:1999 doqs X:-81.2631330833355 Map Scale:1010 Y:28.6966085277811 Elevation: Regulated:NO El Datum: Col Meth:DPHO El Resolut: Col Name:PERRY_JF59 El Units: Col Date:14-Oct-2003 ALB East:666892.46 Col Prog:TANKS-PETROLEUM CONTAMINATION ALB North:524120.18 Ver Meth:DPHO Loc ID:18725 Ver Name:WOEBER_A Lat DD:28 Ver Prog:TANKS-PETROLEUM CONTAMINATION Lat MM:41 Ver Date:08-Jun-2005 Lat SS: OOIC:FACILITY Long DD:81 Rel Feat:EXACT Long MM:15 Datum:HARN Long SS: Coord Acc:4 Col Aff:CONTRACTOR Ver Aff:DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PR Direct: Documents:https://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/electronic-documents/8516641/gis-facility!search FDEP Open Data - Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring (STCM) Loc ID:18725 Rel Feat:EXACT Site Type:Retail Station El Datum: Contam Ind:El Resolut: Phone:9043271217 El Units: Operator:BRENT PUZAK Map Src:1999 doqs Next action:PLACARD 04-AUG-2000 Map Scale:1010 Fin Respon:Coord Acc:4 Office:CD Alb East:666892.46 OOIC:FACILITY Alb North:524120.18 Col Meth:DPHO Datum:HARN Col Name:PERRY_JF59 Elevation: Col Date:10/14/2003 Lat DD:28 Col Prog:TANKS-PETROLEUM CONTAMINATION Lat MM:41 Ver Meth:DPHO Lat SS: Ver Name:WOEBER_A Long DD:81 Ver Prog:TANKS-PETROLEUM CONTAMINATION Long MM:15 Ver Date:6/8/2005 Long SS: Object ID:18725 Col Aff:CONTRACTOR Ver Aff:DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PR Documents:https://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/electronic-documents/8516641/gis-facility!search Storage Tank Contaminated Facility Name & Address Search Details Name:Handy Way Food Store #3333 170 Tuscawilla Rd Winter Springs, FL 32708- 3715 LL Method:DPHO - Digital Aerial Photography with Ground Control Account Owner:The Pantry Inc Contact:Brent Puzak Phone:904-327-1217 District:CD 174 74 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB County 1:59 - Seminole Latitude:28:41:47.7907 Longitude:81:15:47.2791 FDEP - Registered Tanks from Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring (STCM) Details Tank No:2 Size:10000 Content:Unleaded Gas Installed:05/01/1982 Placement:UNDER Status:Removed from Site Construction: Piping: Monitoring: FDEP - Registered Tanks from Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring (STCM) Details Tank No:3 Size:12000 Content:Unleaded Gas Installed:04/01/1995 Placement:UNDER Status:Removed from Site Construction: Piping: Monitoring: FDEP - Registered Tanks from Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring (STCM) Details Tank No:1 Size:10000 Content:Unleaded Gas Installed:05/01/1982 Placement:UNDER Status:Removed from Site Construction: Piping: Monitoring: FDEP - Registered Tanks from Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring (STCM) Details Tank No:5 Size:10000 Content:Unleaded Gas Installed:04/01/1995 Placement:UNDER Status:Removed from Site Construction: Piping: Monitoring: FDEP - Registered Tanks from Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring (STCM) Details Tank No:4 Size:10000 Content:Unleaded Gas Installed:05/01/1982 Placement:UNDER Status:Removed from Site Construction: Piping: Monitoring: 175 75 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB m-12-902948121-b 7 of7 WNW 0.23 / 1,208.67 44.56 / 16 HANDY WAY FOOD STORE #3333 170 TUSCAWILLA RD WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 dd-DWM CONTAM-902948121-bb p1p-902948121-y1y Facility ID:8516641 Contact: Site ID:8516641 Phone: Program Area:Method: Facility Type:Datum: Fac Type:Related Party ID: County ID:59 Primary RP Role: Ftc1 Fac Type ID:A RP Begin Date: Stcm Facility Type:A RP Address1: District:CD RP Address2: Site Status:RP City: Section:36 RP State: Township:20 RP Zip5: County:Seminole RP Zip4: Range:30 RP Phone: Rank:RP Extension: Operator:RP Bad Addr Ind: Name Changed:RP Name: Addr Changed: Facility Name:HANDY WAY FOOD STORE #3333 Description:Retail Station Program Details Facility Status:Staff Assigned: Offsite Contam:Priority: Priority Score:56 Score Effective Dt: Project Coordinato:Score When Ranked: Program Eligible:District: Ineligible:Datum:0 Program Area:PETROLEUM Method:DPHO Site Manager:Lat DD:28 Discharge Date:8/7/2000 Lat MM:41 Discharge Eligibil:E Lat SS:47.98 Eligibility Progrm:SRFA Long DD:81 Cleanup Status:CLOSED-STCM Long MM:15 Closure Type:NFA Long SS:47.02 Closure Date:10/2/2013 Program Details Facility Status:Staff Assigned: Offsite Contam:Priority: Priority Score:56 Score Effective Dt: Project Coordinato:Score When Ranked: Program Eligible:District: Ineligible:Datum:0 Program Area:PETROLEUM Method:DPHO Site Manager:Lat DD:28 Discharge Date:9/28/1987 Lat MM:41 Discharge Eligibil:E Lat SS:47.98 Eligibility Progrm:EDI Long DD:81 Cleanup Status:CLOSED-STCM Long MM:15 Closure Type:NFA Long SS:47.02 Closure Date:10/2/2013 m-13-810090068-b 1 of1 WSW 0.23 / 1,216.74 40.66 / 12 HI FLAVOR MEATS 315 TUSKAWILLA RD WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708-3710 dd-RCRA NON GEN-810090068-bb p1p-810090068-y1y EPA Handler ID:FLR000057604 12 13 DWM CONTAM RCRA NON GEN 176 76 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Gen Status Universe:No Report Contact Name:ROBBIE ONDICK Contact Address:315 , TUSKAWILLA RD , , WINTER SPRINGS , FL, 32708-3710 , US Contact Phone No and Ext:407-365-5661 Contact Email: Contact Country:US County Name:SEMINOLE EPA Region:04 Land Type:Private Receive Date:20110615 Location Latitude:28.692955 Location Longitude:-81.262902 Violation/Evaluation Summary Note:NO VIOLATIONS: All of the compliance records associated with this facility (EPA ID) indicate NO VIOLATIONS; Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement table dated Apr, 2024. Evaluation Details Evaluation Start Date:19990615 Evaluation Type Description:COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION Violation Short Description: Return to Compliance Date: Evaluation Agency:State Handler Summary Importer Activity:No Mixed Waste Generator:No Transporter Activity:No Transfer Facility:No Onsite Burner Exemption:No Furnace Exemption:No Underground Injection Activity:No Commercial TSD:No Used Oil Transporter:No Used Oil Transfer Facility:No Used Oil Processor:No Used Oil Refiner:No Used Oil Burner:No Used Oil Market Burner:No Used Oil Spec Marketer:No Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No:200002 Receive Date:20000217 Handler Name:HI FLAVOR MEATS Source Type:Notification Federal Waste Generator Code:3 Generator Code Description:Very Small Quantity Generator Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No:201106 Receive Date:20110615 Handler Name:HI FLAVOR MEATS Source Type:Implementer Federal Waste Generator Code:N Generator Code Description:Not a Generator, Verified 177 77 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Owner/Operator Details Owner/Operator Ind:Current Operator Street No: Type:Private Street 1:315 TUSKAWILLA RD Name:HI FLAVOR MEATS Street 2: Date Became Current:19990629 City:WINTER SPRINGS Date Ended Current:State:FL Phone:Country:US Source Type:Implementer Zip Code:32708-3710 Owner/Operator Ind:Current Owner Street No: Type:Private Street 1:201 TUSKAWILLA RD Name:ONDICK Street 2: Date Became Current:20000217 City:WINTER SPRINGS Date Ended Current:20000218 State:FL Phone:Country:US Source Type:Notification Zip Code:32708 Owner/Operator Ind:Current Owner Street No: Type:Private Street 1:315 TUSKAWILLA RD Name:HI FLAVOR MEATS INC Street 2: Date Became Current:20000217 City:WINTER SPRINGS Date Ended Current:State:FL Phone:Country:US Source Type:Implementer Zip Code:32708 Owner/Operator Ind:Current Operator Street No: Type:Private Street 1:315 TUSKAWILLA RD Name:HI FLAVOR MEATS Street 2: Date Became Current:19990629 City:WINTER SPRINGS Date Ended Current:State:FL Phone:Country:US Source Type:Notification Zip Code:32708-3710 Owner/Operator Ind:Current Owner Street No: Type:Private Street 1:201 TUSKAWILLA RD Name:ONDICK Street 2: Date Became Current:20000217 City:WINTER SPRINGS Date Ended Current:20000218 State:FL Phone:Country:US Source Type:Implementer Zip Code:32708 Owner/Operator Ind:Current Owner Street No: Type:Private Street 1:315 TUSKAWILLA RD Name:HI FLAVOR MEATS INC Street 2: Date Became Current:20000217 City:WINTER SPRINGS Date Ended Current:State:FL Phone:Country:US Source Type:Notification Zip Code:32708 Historical Handler Details Receive Dt:20000217 Generator Code Description:Very Small Quantity Generator Handler Name:HI FLAVOR MEATS m-14-873504236-b 1 of2 SSW 0.26 / 1,352.18 42.71 / 14 L D PLANTE INC 2950 RAILROAD AVENUE OVIEDO FL 32765 dd-INST-873504236-bb p1p-873504236-y1y Facility ID No:STCM-8520795 Horizontal Referen:HARN Site ID:ERIC_7080 CMC2 Coord Meth ID:CSUR Boundary Key:2 PC2 Proximity ID:EXACT OIC Obj Inter ID:SWIM Create User Name:ERIC_INIT_ICR_LOAD VSC1 Verif Stat ID:REVIEWED Create Date/Time:11/29/2018 Control ID:IC-756 Modify User Name:WILLIAMS_CA Begin Date:4/21/2014 Modify Date/Time:1/14/2021 14 INST 178 78 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Previous Publish?:Yes Collector User Nm:ERIC_INIT_ICR_LOAD Site WMD:SJRWMD Collection Date:11/29/2018 Site Prog Type Key:Area:0 Site Dep Office:CD Len:0 Site ZIP4: Site Name:L.D.PLANTE All Site Names:L.D.PLANTE Site Managing Progr: Control Name:L.D.PLANTE Mechanism Counties:Seminole, Seminole, Seminole Mechanism Category:Recorded ICs, Recorded ICs, Recorded ICs Mechanism Types:Declaration of Restrictive Covenant, Declaration of Restrictive Covenant, Declaration of Restrictive Covenant Mechanism Book No:08246, 8246, 9347 Mechanism Page No:1188, 1188-1192, 320 Mechanism Instr No: Mechanism Effec Dt:02-MAY-19, 21-APR-14, 21-APR-14 Restrictions:Dewatering, Digging, Groundwater Use, Soil Exposure, Stormwater Features Contaminated Media:Groundwater, Soil Contaminations:Aldrin, Antimony, Arsenic, Benzo(a)pyrene, Benzo(a)pyrene Equivalents, Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Cadmium, Chlordane (total), Chromium (total), Dibenz(a,h)anthracene, Dichloroethane, 1,1-, Dichloroethene, 1,1-, Dieldrin, Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene, Isophorone, Lead, Mercury, Naphthalene, PCBs, PCE, PhOH, TCE, Total Xylenes, VOA- Volatile Organic Aromatics-Legacy Engineering Controls:None, Permeable cap Site Documents:https://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/electronic-documents/ERIC_7080/gis-facility!search Description:GROUNDWATER USE RESTRICTION Comments: m-14-893501142-b 2 of2 SSW 0.26 / 1,352.18 42.71 / 14 L D PLANTE INC 2950 RAILROAD AVENUE OVIEDO FL 32765 dd-ENG-893501142-bb p1p-893501142-y1y Facility ID No:STCM-8520795 Horizontal Referen:HARN Site ID:ERIC_7080 CMC2 Coord Meth ID:CSUR Boundary Key:2 PC2 Proximity ID:EXACT OIC Obj Inter ID:SWIM Create User Name:ERIC_INIT_ICR_LOAD VSC1 Verif Stat ID:REVIEWED Create Date/Time:11/29/2018 Control ID:IC-756 Modify User Name:WILLIAMS_CA Begin Date:4/21/2014 Modify Date/Time:1/14/2021 Previous Publish?:Yes Collector User Nm:ERIC_INIT_ICR_LOAD Site WMD:SJRWMD Collection Date:11/29/2018 Site Prog Type Key:Area:0 Site Dep Office:CD Len:0 Site ZIP4: Site Name:L.D.PLANTE All Site Names:L.D.PLANTE Site Managing Progr: Control Name:L.D.PLANTE Mechanism Counties:Seminole, Seminole, Seminole Mechanism Category:Recorded ICs, Recorded ICs, Recorded ICs Mechanism Types:Declaration of Restrictive Covenant, Declaration of Restrictive Covenant, Declaration of Restrictive Covenant Mechanism Book No:08246, 8246, 9347 Mechanism Page No:1188, 1188-1192, 320 Mechanism Instr No: Mechanism Effec Dt:02-MAY-19, 21-APR-14, 21-APR-14 Restrictions:Dewatering, Digging, Groundwater Use, Soil Exposure, Stormwater Features Contaminated Media:Groundwater, Soil Contaminations:Aldrin, Antimony, Arsenic, Benzo(a)pyrene, Benzo(a)pyrene Equivalents, Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Cadmium, Chlordane (total), Chromium (total), Dibenz(a,h)anthracene, Dichloroethane, 1,1-, Dichloroethene, 1,1-, Dieldrin, Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene, Isophorone, Lead, Mercury, Naphthalene, PCBs, PCE, PhOH, TCE, Total Xylenes, VOA- Volatile Organic Aromatics-Legacy Engineering Controls:None, Permeable cap Site Documents:https://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/electronic-documents/ERIC_7080/gis-facility!search Description:GROUNDWATER USE RESTRICTION Comments: 14 ENG 179 79 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB m-15-896309477-b 1 of1 WSW 0.30 / 1,567.39 41.09 / 12 HI-FLAVOR MEATS INC 401 TUSKAWILLA RD WINTER SPRINGS FL 32308 dd-STCS-896309477-bb p1p-896309477-y1y Facility ID:8520784 Clnup Cd (OD): Type:C - Fuel User/Non-Retail Fac Clnup Stat (OD): Status:Closed Clnup Dt (OD): Status (OD):REVIEWED Status (Map):REVIEWED Fac Stat (OD):CLOSED Contam (Map): Fac Code (OD):C Fac Type (Map):Fuel user/Non-retail Facility 1:Fuel user/Non-retail Fac Stat (Map):CLOSED Fac Name (OD):HI-FLAVOR MEATS INC Address (OD):401 TUSKAWILLA RD City (OD):WINTER SPRINGS County (OD):SEMINOLE Zip5 (OD):32308 Name (Map):HI-FLAVOR MEATS INC Address (Map):401 TUSKAWILLA RD City (Map):WINTER SPRINGS County (Map):59 Zip4 (Map):0 Zip5 (Map):32308 Address Line 1:401 Tuskawilla Rd Address Line 2: City:Winter Springs County:SEMINOLE State:FL Zip:32308 Report Source:FDEP Geospatial Open Data - Registered Tanks from Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring (STCM) (OD); FDEP Geospatial Open Data - Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring (STCM) (Map); Storage Tank Contaminated Facility Name and Address Search FDEP Storage Tank Monitoring Open Data Details Object ID:9761 Map Src:1994 doqs X:-81.2629469166686 Map Scale:2021 Y:28.6928577500029 Elevation: Regulated:NO El Datum: Col Meth:DPHO El Resolut: Col Name:PERRY_JF59 El Units: Col Date:21-Jul-2003 ALB East:666919.85 Col Prog:TANKS-PETROLEUM CONTAMINATION ALB North:523704.15 Ver Meth:DPHO Loc ID:18606 Ver Name:PERRY_JF59 Lat DD:28 Ver Prog:TANKS-PETROLEUM CONTAMINATION Lat MM:41 Ver Date:21-Jul-2003 Lat SS: OOIC:FACILITY Long DD:81 Rel Feat:APPRX Long MM:15 Datum:HARN Long SS: Coord Acc:4 Col Aff:CONTRACTOR Ver Aff:CONTRACTOR Direct: Documents:https://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/electronic-documents/8520784/gis-facility!search FDEP Open Data - Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring (STCM) Loc ID:18606 Rel Feat:APPRX Site Type:Fuel user/Non-retail El Datum: Contam Ind:El Resolut: Phone:4076443720 El Units: Operator:ROBBIE ONDICK Map Src:1994 doqs Next action:Map Scale:2021 Fin Respon:Coord Acc:4 Office:CD Alb East:666919.85 OOIC:FACILITY Alb North:523704.15 Col Meth:DPHO Datum:HARN 15 STCS 180 80 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Col Name:PERRY_JF59 Elevation: Col Date:7/21/2003 Lat DD:28 Col Prog:TANKS-PETROLEUM CONTAMINATION Lat MM:41 Ver Meth:DPHO Lat SS: Ver Name:PERRY_JF59 Long DD:81 Ver Prog:TANKS-PETROLEUM CONTAMINATION Long MM:15 Ver Date:7/21/2003 Long SS: Object ID:18606 Col Aff:CONTRACTOR Ver Aff:CONTRACTOR Documents:https://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/electronic-documents/8520784/gis-facility!search Storage Tank Contaminated Facility Name & Address Search Details Name:Hi-Flavor Meats Inc 401 Tuskawilla Rd Winter Springs, FL 32308 LL Method:DPHO - Autonomous GPS Account Owner:Hi Flavor Meats Inc Contact:Robbie Ondick Phone:407-644-3720 District:CD County 1:59 - Seminole Latitude:28:41:34.2879 Longitude:81:15:46.6089 FDEP - Registered Tanks from Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring (STCM) Details Tank No:1 Size:1000 Content:Vehicular Diesel Installed: Placement:ABOVE Status:Removed from Site Construction: Piping: Monitoring: m-16-867434614-b 1 of1 SW 0.41 / 2,164.61 46.54 / 18 TUSKAWILLA CROSSINGS DISASTER DEBRIS MANAGEMENT SITE 395 TUSKAWILLA RD WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 dd-SWF/LF-867434614-bb p1p-867434614-y1y Facility ID:104855 District:CD Fac Type (Geodata):Solid Waste Section: Fac Stat (Geodata):Inactive Township: Status Dt (Geodat):2018/01/22 00:00:00+00 Range: Ownership (Geodat):Private County ID (Geodat):59 Zip4 (Geodata):3710 County (Geodata):Seminole Zip5 (Geodata):32708 County:SEMINOLE District (Geodata):CD Latitude:28:41:37.4955 Office (Geodata):Seminole Longitude:81:15:44.14 Resp Authority: RA Address: City1: RA State: Zip1: RA Phone No.: RA Email: Site Supervisor: SS Address: City 1: SS State: Zip 1: SS Phone No: 16 SWF/LF 181 81 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB SS Email: Land Owner: LO Address: City 2: LO State: Zip 2: LO Phone No: Facility Name (Geodata):TUSKAWILLA CROSSINGS DISASTER DEBRIS MANAGEMENT SITE Address (Geodata):395 TUSKAWILLA RD City (Geodata):Winter Springs Documents (Geodata):https://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/electronic-documents/104855/gis-facility!search Reports (Geodata):https://fldep.dep.state.fl.us/WWW_WACS/Reports/SW_Facility_Inventory_res2.asp?wacsid=104855 Info Portal Facility URL:http://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/facilitysearch?pagination=true&facility.id=104855 Oculus Docs Inventory URL:https://erisservice7.ecologeris.com/ErisExt/flo/ocure.ashx?ID=104855&CAT=8 Data Source:Solid Waste Facility Inventory Report; Florida DEP Geospatial Open Data Class details Class:DISASTER DEBRIS MANAGEMENT SITE Class Status:INACTIVE (I) Solid Waste Facility Inventory Geospatial Open Data Object of Interest:Facility Lat DD:28 Accuracy Level:3 Lat MM:41 Accuracy:1.1 - 10 meters Lat SS: QA Status:Reviewed Long DD:81 Datum ID:NAD83 Long MM:15 X:666984.526199825 Long SS: Y:523804.558000341 Class: Class Status: Proximity ID:Approximate feature location Coord Method ID:Digital Aerial Photography Solid Waste Facility Inventory Geospatial Open Data Object of Interest:Waste Processing Area Lat DD:28 Accuracy Level:3 Lat MM:41 Accuracy:1.1 - 10 meters Lat SS: QA Status:Reviewed Long DD:81 Datum ID:NAD83 Long MM:15 X:666984.525099825 Long SS: Y:523804.558200346 Class:DISASTER DEBRIS MANAGEMENT SITE Class Status:Inactive Proximity ID:Approximate feature location Coord Method ID:Digital Aerial Photography m-17-896359442-b 1 of1 NW 0.42 / 2,206.15 45.58 / 17 PUBLIX SUPER MARKET #62 1160 E SR 434 WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 dd-STCS-896359442-bb p1p-896359442-y1y Facility ID:9809815 Clnup Cd (OD): Type:C - Fuel User/Non-Retail Fac Clnup Stat (OD): Status:Open Clnup Dt (OD): Status (OD):REVIEWED Status (Map):REVIEWED Fac Stat (OD):OPEN Contam (Map): Fac Code (OD):C Fac Type (Map):Fuel user/Non-retail Facility 1:Fuel user/Non-retail Fac Stat (Map):OPEN Fac Name (OD):PUBLIX SUPER MARKET #62 Address (OD):1160 E SR 434 City (OD):WINTER SPRINGS County (OD):SEMINOLE Zip5 (OD):32708 17 STCS 182 82 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Name (Map):PUBLIX SUPER MARKET #62 Address (Map):1160 E SR 434 City (Map):WINTER SPRINGS County (Map):59 Zip4 (Map):0 Zip5 (Map):32708 Address Line 1:1160 E Sr 434 Address Line 2: City:Winter Springs County:SEMINOLE State:FL Zip:32708 Report Source:FDEP Geospatial Open Data - Registered Tanks from Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring (STCM) (OD); FDEP Geospatial Open Data - Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring (STCM) (Map); Storage Tank Contaminated Facility Name and Address Search FDEP Storage Tank Monitoring Open Data Details Object ID:63283 Map Src:2004 DOQQs X:-81.2638055555575 Map Scale:2705 Y:28.6997684166702 Elevation: Regulated:YES El Datum: Col Meth:DPHO El Resolut: Col Name:PERRY_JF El Units: Col Date:25-Apr-2008 ALB East:666819.1 Col Prog:TANKS-PETROLEUM CONTAMINATION ALB North:524469.56 Ver Meth:DPHO Loc ID:63231 Ver Name:PERRY_JF Lat DD:28 Ver Prog:TANKS-PETROLEUM CONTAMINATION Lat MM:41 Ver Date:25-Apr-2008 Lat SS: OOIC:FACILITY Long DD:81 Rel Feat:VICIN Long MM:15 Datum:HARN Long SS: Coord Acc:4 Col Aff:SEMINOLE COUNTY Ver Aff:SEMINOLE COUNTY Direct: Documents:https://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/electronic-documents/9809815/gis-facility!search FDEP Open Data - Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring (STCM) Loc ID:63231 Rel Feat:VICIN Site Type:Fuel user/Non-retail El Datum: Contam Ind:El Resolut: Phone:4073279725 El Units: Operator:STORE MANAGER Map Src:2004 DOQQs Next action:PLACARD 27-JUN-2024 Map Scale:2705 Fin Respon:Coord Acc:4 Office:CD Alb East:666819.1 OOIC:FACILITY Alb North:524469.56 Col Meth:DPHO Datum:HARN Col Name:PERRY_JF Elevation: Col Date:4/25/2008 Lat DD:28 Col Prog:TANKS-PETROLEUM CONTAMINATION Lat MM:41 Ver Meth:DPHO Lat SS: Ver Name:PERRY_JF Long DD:81 Ver Prog:TANKS-PETROLEUM CONTAMINATION Long MM:15 Ver Date:4/25/2008 Long SS: Object ID:63231 Col Aff:SEMINOLE COUNTY Ver Aff:SEMINOLE COUNTY Documents:https://prodenv.dep.state.fl.us/DepNexus/public/electronic-documents/9809815/gis-facility!search Storage Tank Contaminated Facility Name & Address Search Details Name:Publix Super Market #62 183 83 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB 1160 E Sr 434 Winter Springs, FL 32708 LL Method:DPHO Account Owner:Publix Super Markets Inc - Environmental Contact:Store Manager Phone:407-327-9725 District:CD County 1:59 - Seminole Latitude:28:41:59.1663 Longitude:81:15:49.7000 FDEP - Registered Tanks from Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring (STCM) Details Tank No:2 Size:1000 Content:Emerg Generator Diesel Installed:02/01/2024 Placement:ABOVE Status:In Service Construction:C - Steel I - Double Wall M - Spill Containment Bucket P - Level Gauges/Alarms Piping:A - Abv, No Soil Contact I - Suction Piping System Monitoring:1 - Continuous Electronic Sensing F - Monitor Dbl Wall Tank Space Q - Visual Inspection Of Asts FDEP - Registered Tanks from Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring (STCM) Details Tank No:1 Size:1000 Content:Emerg Generator Diesel Installed:11/01/2007 Placement:ABOVE Status:Removed from Site Construction: Piping: Monitoring: m-18-888585637-b 1 of1 ESE 0.74 / 3,926.72 14.53 / -14 SULLIVAN MATERIALS - TUSCAWILLA UNITS SEMINOLE COUNTY WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708 dd-MRDS-888585637-bb p1p-888585637-y1y Dep ID:10306524 I1:77 Dev Status:PRODUCER Latitude:28.690125 Code List:SD Longitude:-81.246399 Url:http://mrdata.usgs.gov/mrds/show-mrds.php?dep_id=10306524 Commodity I1:19 Line:1 Code:SD Inserted By:woodruff Commodity:Sand Insert Date:03-JUL-2003 15:08:22 Commodity Type:Non-metallic Updated By: Commodity Group:Sand Update Date: Importance:Primary Names I1:29 Inserted By:woodruff Status:Current Insert Date:03-JUL-03 18 MRDS 184 84 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Site Name:Sullivan Materials - Tuscawilla Uni Updated By: Line:1 Update Date: 185 85 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 h-Unplottable Summary Total: 0 Unplottable sites DB Company Name/Site Name Address City Zip ERIS ID No unplottable records were found that may be relevant for the search criteria. Unplottable Summary 186 86 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 h-Unplottable Report No unplottable records were found that may be relevant for the search criteria. Unplottable Report 187 87 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 h-Appendix: Database Descriptions Environmental Risk Information Services (ERIS) can search the following databases. The extent of historical information varies with each database and current information is determined by what is publicly available to ERIS at the time of update. ERIS updates databases as set out in ASTM Standard E1527-13 and E1527-21, Section 8.1.8 Sources of Standard Source Information: "Government information from nongovernmental sources may be considered current if the source updates the information at least every 90 days, or, for information that is updated less frequently than quarterly by the government agency, within 90 days of the date the government agency makes the information available to the public." Standard Environmental Record Sources Federal National Priority List:rr-NPL-bb The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s National Priorities List (NPL) includes the most serious uncontrolled or abandoned hazardous waste sites identified for possible long-term remedial action under the Superfund program, based primarily on the score a site receives from EPA's Hazard Ranking System. A site must be on the NPL to receive money from the Superfund Trust Fund for remedial action. This data includes NPL sites represented as polygons, where available, that can be sourced from the EPA NPL Superfund Site Boundaries dataset, refreshed by the Shared Enterprise Geodata and Services (SEGS). These site boundaries represent the footprint of a whole site, the sum of all the Operable Units (OUs) and the current understanding of the full extent of contamination; for Federal Facility sites, the total site polygon may be the Facility boundary. As site investigation and remediation progress, OUs may be added, modified or refined. Data provided by external parties is not independently verified by EPA. This boundary data is made available to the public strictly for informational purposes. Where there is no polygon boundary data available for a given site, the site is represented as a point. Government Publication Date: Sep 25, 2024 National Priority List - Proposed:rr-PROPOSED NPL-bb Sites proposed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the state agency, or concerned citizens for addition to the National Priorities List (NPL) due to contamination by hazardous waste and identified by the EPA as a candidate for cleanup because it poses a risk to human health and/or the environment. Sites represented as polygons, where available, can be sourced from the EPA NPL Superfund Site Boundaries dataset, refreshed by the Shared Enterprise Geodata and Services (SEGS). These site boundaries represent the footprint of a whole site, the sum of all the Operable Units (OUs) and the current understanding of the full extent of contamination; for Federal Facility sites, the total site polygon may be the Facility boundary. Data provided by external parties is not independently verified by EPA. This boundary data is made available to the public strictly for informational purposes. Where there is no polygon boundary data available for a given site, the site is represented as a point. Government Publication Date: Sep 25, 2024 Deleted NPL:rr-DELETED NPL-bb Sites deleted from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s National Priorities List (NPL). The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Sites represented as polygons, where available, can be sourced from the EPA NPL Superfund Site Boundaries dataset, refreshed by the Shared Enterprise Geodata and Services (SEGS). These site boundaries represent the footprint of a whole site, the sum of all the Operable Units (OUs) and the current understanding of the full extent of contamination; for Federal Facility sites, the total site polygon may be the Facility boundary. Data provided by external parties is not independently verified by EPA. This boundary data is made available to the public strictly for informational purposes. Where there is no polygon boundary data available for a given site, the site is represented as a point. Government Publication Date: Sep 25, 2024 NPL PROPOSED NPL DELETED NPL Appendix: Database Descriptions 188 88 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 SEMS List 8R Active Site Inventory:rr-SEMS-bb The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Superfund Program has deployed the Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS), which integrates multiple legacy systems into a comprehensive tracking and reporting tool. This inventory contains active sites evaluated by the Superfund program that are either proposed to be or are on the National Priorities List (NPL) as well as sites that are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. The Active Site Inventory Report displays site and location information at active SEMS sites. An active site is one at which site assessment, removal, remedial, enforcement, cost recovery, or oversight activities are being planned or conducted. This data includes SEMS sites from the List 8R Active file as well as applicable sites from the EPA's Facility Registry Service map tool. Government Publication Date: Jul 24, 2024 Inventory of Open Dumps, June 1985:rr-ODI-bb The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) provides for publication of an inventory of open dumps. The Act defines "open dumps" as facilities which do not comply with EPA's "Criteria for Classification of Solid Waste Disposal Facilities and Practices" (40 CFR 257). Government Publication Date: Jun 1985 SEMS List 8R Archive Sites:rr-SEMS ARCHIVE-bb The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS) Archived Site Inventory displays site and location information at sites archived from SEMS. An archived site is one at which EPA has determined that assessment has been completed and no further remedial action is planned under the Superfund program at this time. This data includes sites from the List 8R Archived site file. Government Publication Date: Jul 24, 2024 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System - CERCLIS: rr-CERCLIS-bb Superfund is a program administered by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to locate, investigate, and clean up the worst hazardous waste sites throughout the United States. CERCLIS is a database of potential and confirmed hazardous waste sites at which the EPA Superfund program has some involvement. It contains sites that are either proposed to be or are on the National Priorities List (NPL) as well as sites that are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. The EPA administers the Superfund program in cooperation with individual states and tribal governments; this database is made available by the EPA. Government Publication Date: Oct 25, 2013 EPA Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands:rr-IODI-bb Public Law 103-399, The Indian Lands Open Dump Cleanup Act of 1994, enacted October 22, 1994, identified congressional concerns that solid waste open dump sites located on American Indian or Alaska Native (AI/AN) lands threaten the health and safety of residents of those lands and contiguous areas. The purpose of the Act is to identify the location of open dumps on Indian lands, assess the relative health and environment hazards posed by those sites, and provide financial and technical assistance to Indian tribal governments to close such dumps in compliance with Federal standards and regulations or standards promulgated by Indian Tribal governments or Alaska Native entities. Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 1998 CERCLIS - No Further Remedial Action Planned:rr-CERCLIS NFRAP-bb An archived site is one at which EPA has determined that assessment has been completed and no further remedial action is planned under the Superfund program at this time. The Archive designation means that, to the best of EPA's knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL). This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that, based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site. Government Publication Date: Oct 25, 2013 CERCLIS Liens:rr-CERCLIS LIENS-bb A Federal Superfund lien exists at any property where EPA has incurred Superfund costs to address contamination ("Superfund site") and has provided notice of liability to the property owner. A Federal CERCLA ("Superfund") lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. This database is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This database was provided by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Refer to SEMS LIEN as the current data source for Superfund Liens. Government Publication Date: Jan 30, 2014 RCRA CORRACTS-Corrective Action:rr-RCRA CORRACTS-bb RCRA Info is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. At these sites, the Corrective Action Program ensures that cleanups occur. EPA and state regulators work with facilities and communities to design remedies based on the contamination, geology, and anticipated use unique to each site. Government Publication Date: Apr 8, 2024 SEMS ODI SEMS ARCHIVE CERCLIS IODI CERCLIS NFRAP CERCLIS LIENS RCRA CORRACTS 189 89 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD Facilities:rr-RCRA TSD-bb RCRA Info is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. This database includes Non- Corrective Action sites that have indicated engagement in the treatment, storage, or disposal of hazardous waste which requires a RCRA hazardous waste permit. Government Publication Date: Apr 8, 2024 RCRA Generator List:rr-RCRA LQG-bb RCRA Info is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Large Quantity Generators (LQGs) generate 1,000 kilograms per month or more of hazardous waste or more than one kilogram per month of acutely hazardous waste. Government Publication Date: Apr 8, 2024 RCRA Small Quantity Generators List:rr-RCRA SQG-bb RCRA Info is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Small Quantity Generators (SQGs) generate more than 100 kilograms, but less than 1,000 kilograms, of hazardous waste per month. Government Publication Date: Apr 8, 2024 RCRA Very Small Quantity Generators List:rr-RCRA VSQG-bb RCRA Info is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Very Small Quantity Generators (VSQG) generate 100 kilograms or less per month of hazardous waste, or one kilogram or less per month of acutely hazardous waste. Additionally, VSQG may not accumulate more than 1,000 kilograms of hazardous waste at any time. Government Publication Date: Apr 8, 2024 RCRA Non-Generators:rr-RCRA NON GEN-bb RCRA Info is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. Government Publication Date: Apr 8, 2024 RCRA Sites with Controls:rr-RCRA CONTROLS-bb List of Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) facilities with institutional controls in place. RCRA gives the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) the authority to control hazardous waste from the "cradle-to-grave." This includes the generation, transportation, treatment, storage, and disposal of hazardous waste. RCRA also set forth a framework for the management of non-hazardous solid wastes. The 1986 amendments to RCRA enabled EPA to address environmental problems that could result from underground tanks storing petroleum and other hazardous substances. Government Publication Date: Apr 8, 2024 Federal Engineering Controls-ECs:rr-FED ENG-bb List of Engineering controls (ECs) made availabe by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ECs encompass a variety of engineered and constructed physical barriers (e.g., soil capping, sub-surface venting systems, mitigation barriers, fences) to contain and/or prevent exposure to contamination on a property. The EC listing includes remedy component data from Superfund decision documents for applicable sites on the final or deleted on the National Priorities List (NPL); and sites with a Superfund Alternative Approach (SAA) Agreement in place. The only sites included that are not on the NPL; proposed for NPL; or removed from proposed NPL, are those with an SAA Agreement in place. Government Publication Date: Sep 25, 2024 RCRA TSD RCRA LQG RCRA SQG RCRA VSQG RCRA NON GEN RCRA CONTROLS FED ENG 190 90 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Federal Institutional Controls- ICs:rr-FED INST-bb List of Institutional controls (ICs) made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ICs are non-engineered instruments, such as administrative and legal controls, that help minimize the potential for human exposure to contamination and/or protect the integrity of the remedy. Although it is EPA's expectation that treatment or engineering controls will be used to address principal threat wastes and that groundwater will be returned to its beneficial use whenever practicable, ICs play an important role in site remedies because they reduce exposure to contamination by limiting land or resource use and guide human behavior at a site. The IC listing includes remedy component data from Superfund decision documents for applicable sites on the final or deleted on the National Priorities List (NPL); and sites with a Superfund Alternative Approach (SAA) Agreement in place. The only sites included that are not on the NPL; proposed for NPL; or removed from proposed NPL, are those with an SAA Agreement in place. Government Publication Date: Sep 25, 2024 Land Use Control Information System:rr-LUCIS-bb The LUCIS database is maintained by the U.S. Department of the Navy and contains information for former Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) properties across the United States. Government Publication Date: Sep 1, 2006 Institutional Control Boundaries at NPL sites:rr-NPL IC-bb These boundaries of Institutional Control areas at sites on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) National Priorities List (NPL), or as Proposed or Deleted, are sourced from the EPA NPL Superfund Site Boundaries dataset, refreshed by the Shared Enterprise Geodata and Services (SEGS). The EPA's NPL includes the most serious uncontrolled or abandoned hazardous waste sites identified for possible long-term remedial action under the Superfund program. Institutional controls are non-engineered instruments such as administrative and legal controls that help minimize the potential for human exposure to contamination and/or protect the integrity of the remedy. Data provided by external parties is not independently verified by EPA. This boundary data is made available to the public strictly for informational purposes. Government Publication Date: Sep 25, 2024 Emergency Response Notification System:rr-ERNS 1982 TO 1986-bb Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports controlled by the National Response Center. The primary function of the National Response Center is to serve as the sole national point of contact for reporting oil, chemical, radiological, biological, and etiological discharges into the environment anywhere in the United States and its territories. Government Publication Date: 1982-1986 Emergency Response Notification System:rr-ERNS 1987 TO 1989-bb Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports controlled by the National Response Center. The primary function of the National Response Center is to serve as the sole national point of contact for reporting oil, chemical, radiological, biological, and etiological discharges into the environment anywhere in the United States and its territories. Government Publication Date: 1987-1989 Emergency Response Notification System:rr-ERNS-bb Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports made available by the United States Coast Guard National Response Center (NRC). The NRC fields initial reports for pollution and railroad incidents and forwards that information to appropriate federal/state agencies for response. These data contain initial incident data that has not been validated or investigated by a federal/state response agency. Government Publication Date: Oct 15, 2024 The Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) Brownfield Database:rr-FED BROWNFIELDS-bb Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties protects the environment, reduces blight, and takes development pressures off greenspaces and working lands. This data is provided by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and includes Brownfield sites from the Cleanups in My Community (CIMC) web application. Government Publication Date: Feb 7, 2024 FEMA Underground Storage Tank Listing:rr-FEMA UST-bb The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) of the Department of Homeland Security maintains a list of FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2017 FED INST LUCIS NPL IC ERNS 1982 TO 1986 ERNS 1987 TO 1989 ERNS FED BROWNFIELDS FEMA UST 191 91 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Facility Response Plan:rr-FRP-bb This listing contains facilities that have submitted Facility Response Plans (FRPs) to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Facilities that could reasonably be expected to cause "substantial harm" to the environment by discharging oil into or on navigable waters are required to prepare and submit FRPs. Harm is determined based on total oil storage capacity, secondary containment and age of tanks, oil transfer activities, history of discharges, proximity to a public drinking water intake or sensitive environments. This listing includes FRP facilities from an applicable EPA FOIA file and Homeland Infrastructure Foundation-Level Data (HIFLD) data file. Government Publication Date: Jan 9, 2024 Delisted Facility Response Plans:rr-DELISTED FRP-bb Facilities that once appeared in - and have since been removed from - the list of facilities that have submitted Facility Response Plans (FRP) to EPA. Facilities that could reasonably be expected to cause "substantial harm" to the environment by discharging oil into or on navigable waters are required to prepare and submit Facility Response Plans (FRPs). Harm is determined based on total oil storage capacity, secondary containment and age of tanks, oil transfer activities, history of discharges, proximity to a public drinking water intake or sensitive environments. Government Publication Date: Jan 9, 2024 Historical Gas Stations:rr-HIST GAS STATIONS-bb This historic directory of service stations is provided by the Cities Service Company. The directory includes Cities Service filling stations that were located throughout the United States in 1930. Government Publication Date: Jul 1, 1930 Petroleum Refineries:rr-REFN-bb This list of petroleum refineries is sourced from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), Refinery Capacity Report. The listing includes operating and idle petroleum refineries (including new refineries under construction) and refineries shut down during the previous year. The geographic area the report covers is the 50 States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, and other U.S. possessions. Per the EIA, the facility location data represents the approximate location based on research of publicly available information from sources such as Federal agencies, company websites, and satellite images on public websites. Government Publication Date: Jun 6, 2024 Petroleum Product and Crude Oil Rail Terminals:rr-BULK TERMINAL-bb A list of petroleum product and crude oil rail terminals from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), as well as petroleum terminals sourced from the Federal Communications Commission Data hosted by the Homeland Infrastructure Foundation-Level Database. Data includes operable bulk petroleum product terminals with a total bulk shell storage capacity of 50,000 barrels or more, and/or the ability to receive volumes from tanker, barge, or pipeline; also rail terminals handling the loading and unloading of crude oil with activity between 2017 and 2018. EIA petroleum product terminal data comes from the EIA-815 Bulk Terminal and Blender Report, which includes working, shell in operation, and shell idle for several major product groupings. Government Publication Date: Jun 6, 2024 LIEN on Property:rr-SEMS LIEN-bb The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS) provides Lien details on applicable properties, such as the Superfund lien on property activity, the lien property information, and the parties associated with the lien. Government Publication Date: Jul 24, 2024 Superfund Decision Documents:rr-SUPERFUND ROD-bb This database contains a list of decision documents for Superfund sites. Decision documents serve to provide the reasoning for the choice of (or) changes to a Superfund Site cleanup plan. The decision documents include completed Records of Decision (ROD), ROD Amendments, Explanations of Significant Differences (ESD) for active and archived sites stored in the Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS), along with other associated memos and files. This information is maintained and made available by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Government Publication Date: Oct 24, 2024 Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program:rr-DOE FUSRAP-bb The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from the Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations. The DOE Office of Legacy Management (LM) established long-term surveillance and maintenance (LTS&M) requirements for remediated FUSRAP sites. DOE evaluates the final site conditions of a remediated site on the basis of risk for different future uses. DOE then confirms that LTS&M requirements will maintain protectiveness. Government Publication Date: Mar 4, 2017 FRP DELISTED FRP HIST GAS STATIONS REFN BULK TERMINAL SEMS LIEN SUPERFUND ROD DOE FUSRAP 192 92 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 State Superfund Waste Cleanup & State-Funded Action Sites:rr-SHWS-bb List of hazardous waste cleanup sites participating in various federal and state funded cleanup programs. Florida's State-Funded Action Sites and Superfund Waste Cleanup Sites lists are maintained and made available by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). This database serves a purpose similar to that of the federal Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS), functioning as a state-level counterpart for tracking potential hazardous substance release sites. Government Publication Date: Oct 11, 2024 Delisted State-Funded Action Sites:rr-DELISTED SHWS-bb This database contains a list of closed hazardous waste sites of various federal and state funded cleanup programs that were removed from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). Government Publication Date: Oct 11, 2024 ERIC Waste Cleanup:rr-ERIC-bb Environmental Restoration Integrated Cleanup (ERIC) is a single database for tracking contaminated site cleanup activities in the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP)'s Division of Waste Management (DWM). Includes records from 11 different DEP data systems, allowing tracking of a contaminated site throughout the course of cleanup regardless of which program area took the lead. Government Publication Date: Sep 13, 2024 Florida Department of Environmental Protection Cleanup Sites:rr-CLEANUP DEP-bb The Cleanup Sites layer feeds the FDEP's Contamination Locator Map (CLM). It provides locations and document links for sites currently in the cleanup process and sites awaiting cleanup funding. Cleanup programs include: Brownfields, Petroleum, EPA Superfund (CERCLA), Drycleaning, Responsible Party Cleanup, State Funded Cleanup, State Owned Lands Cleanup and Hazardous Waste Cleanup. Government Publication Date: Oct 29, 2024 Waste Cleanup Responsible Party Sites:rr-WCRPS-bb List of Open, Closed, and Inactive Waste Cleanup Responsible Party sites made available by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Government Publication Date: Apr 11, 2021 Delisted Waste Cleanup Sites:rr-DELISTED WCP-bb List of sites which once appeared on - and have since been removed from - the list of Waste Cleanup Sites made available by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Government Publication Date: Oct 29, 2024 Solid Waste Facilities and Landfills:rr-SWF/LF-bb The Solid Waste Facility Inventory Report made available by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) includes all types of authorized and unauthorized facilities: municipal solid waste, landfills, dumps, construction and demolition disposal, recycling facilities, and more. Government Publication Date: Jun 12, 2024 Leaking Tanks:rr-LST-bb The Storage Tank Regulation Section is part of the Petroleum Restoration Program in the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP)s Division of Waste Management. In 1983, Florida was one of the first states in the union to pass legislation and adopt rules for underground and aboveground storage tank systems. Since then, over 28,000 facilities have reported discharges of petroleum products from storage tank systems. Florida relies on groundwater for about 92 percent of its drinking water needs, and has some of the most stringent rules in the country. Government Publication Date: Apr 22, 2024 Delisted Leaking Tanks:rr-DELISTED LST-bb Whereas Leaking Tanks (LST) includes only facilities which currently have contamination as recorded by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, this list contains facilities which were once included in LST data but no longer appear on the list made available by FDEP. Facilities may be removed from the current LST list because the discharge has been cleaned up, or the discharge is not required for 62-770. Government Publication Date: Aug 28, 2024 Underground Storage Tanks:rr-UST-bb List of Underground Storage Tank facilities made available by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FL DEP). Includes facilities tracked for active storage tanks, storage tank history, or petroleum cleanup activity. In an effort to minimize the occurrence and environmental risks of releases and discharges, FDEP administers standards pertaining to the construction, installation, operation, maintenance, repair, closure, and disposal of underground storage tank systems that store regulated substances. SHWS DELISTED SHWS ERIC CLEANUP DEP WCRPS DELISTED WCP SWF/LF LST DELISTED LST UST 193 93 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Government Publication Date: Oct 1, 2024 Aboveground Storage Tanks:rr-AST-bb List of Aboveground Storage Tank facilities made available by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FL DEP). Includes facilities tracked for active storage tanks, storage tank history, or petroleum cleanup activity.The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) provides standards for aboveground storage tanks (ASTs) that have individual storage tank capacities greater than 550 gallons. The state also regulates the registration, construction, installation, operation, maintenance, repair, closure, and disposal of storage tank systems that store regulated substances. Government Publication Date: Oct 1, 2024 Storage Tank Facilities:rr-TANK-bb List of storage tank facilities made available by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FL DEP) for which tank information is not available. In the case of closed facilities - where all tanks have been removed or closed, and there is also no petroleum discharge or on-going cleanup activity - the owner data may not be current, but rather would represent the most recent information made available to FL DEP. Government Publication Date: Oct 1, 2024 Delisted AST UST Storage Tanks:rr-DEL UST AST TANK-bb This database contains a list of closed UST and AST storage tank sites that were removed from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) storage tank database. Government Publication Date: Jul 2, 2015 Delisted Storage Tanks:rr-DEL STORAGE TANK-bb List of sites that once appeared on - and have since been removed from - the list of UST and AST storage tank facilities made available by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Government Publication Date: Oct 4, 2024 Federal Facilities Listing:rr-FF TANKS-bb The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Storage Tank Program registers facilities and storage tanks where aboveground or underground storage tanks store pollutants, hazardous substances, and/or mineral acid substances regulated by Chapter 62-761, Florida Administrative Code, or when aboveground storage tanks or compression vessels store a hazardous substance which requires registration according to Chapter 376, Florida Statutes. Government Publication Date: Oct 4, 2024 Storage Tank/Contaminated Facility Search:rr-STCS-bb List of facilities and tanks in the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems Storage Tank/Contaminated Facility Search. Note that tank details do not appear for facilities for which all tanks have been removed. Government Publication Date: Aug 28, 2024 Institutional Controls Registry:rr-INST-bb The Institutional Controls registry is maintained by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). The registry aims to help preserve adequate protection of contaminated soil regions and help to minimize any chances of exposure. Government Publication Date: Nov 11, 2024 Engineering Controls:rr-ENG-bb A listing of all engineering controls that are in place to eliminate or reduce the potential for contaminant migration and exposure to contaminants. These controls may include caps, barriers, guards or fences. The list is maintained by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). Government Publication Date: Nov 11, 2024 Voluntary Cleanup Sites:rr-VCP-bb A listing of active and closed voluntary cleanup sites registered by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). Government Publication Date: Aug 30, 2024 Brownfield Sites:rr-BROWNFIELDS-bb Brownfields are defined by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) as abandoned, idled, or underused industrial and commercial facilities where expansion or redevelopment is complicated by real or perceived environmental contamination. This is a list of sites within designated Brownfield Areas within Florida where Brownfield Site Rehabilitation Agreement (BSRA)s have been executed between FDEP and a responsible party. Government Publication Date: Jan 16, 2024 AST TANK DEL UST AST TANK DEL STORAGE TANK FF TANKS STCS INST ENG VCP BROWNFIELDS 194 94 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Brownfield Areas:rr-BROWNFIELD AREA-bb Brownfields are defined by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) as abandoned, idled, or underused industrial and commercial facilities where expansion or redevelopment is complicated by real or perceived environmental contamination. This is a list of Brownfield Areas, defined by the FDEP as contiguous areas of one or more brownfield sites, some of which may not be contaminated, that have been designated as such by a local government resolution. Such areas may include all or portions of community redevelopment areas, enterprise zones, empowerment zones, other such designated economically deprived communities and areas, and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) designated brownfield pilot projects. Because a variety of sources and methods were used to derive information for this data, locations are approximate. Government Publication Date: Apr 2, 2024 Hazardous Waste Facility List:rr-HAZ WASTE FAC-bb List of Hazardous Waste Financial Assurance Facilities made available by the Division of Waste Management of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). The FDEP's Hazardous waste financial responsibility requirements exist to ensure that certain hazardous waste facilities and transporters have the financial resources available to provide for closure, postclosure and corrective action requirements and/or pay for bodily injury or property damage that might result from accidents, spills or other unexpected events, known as liabilities. These closure, postclosure, corrective action and liability requirements are called financial assurance. Government Publication Date: Oct 3, 2024 Tribal Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Tribal/Indian Lands:rr-INDIAN LUST-bb This list of leaking underground storage tanks (LUSTs) on Tribal/Indian Lands in Region 4, which includes Florida, is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date: May 14, 2024 Underground Storage Tanks on Tribal/Indian Lands:rr-INDIAN UST-bb This list of underground storage tanks (USTs) on Tribal/Indian Lands in Region 4, which includes Florida, is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date: May 14, 2024 Delisted Tribal Leaking Storage Tanks:rr-DELISTED INDIAN LST-bb Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) facilities which once appeared on - and have since been removed from - the Regional Tribal/Indian LUST lists made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date: May 7, 2024 Delisted Tribal Underground Storage Tanks:rr-DELISTED INDIAN UST-bb Underground Storage Tank (UST) facilities which once appeared on - and have since been removed from - the Regional Tribal/Indian UST lists made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date: May 7, 2024 County No County databases were selected to be included in the search. Additional Environmental Record Sources Federal PFAS Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data:rr-PFAS GHG-bb The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) collects Greenhouse Gas (GHG) data from large emitting facilities (25,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) per year), and suppliers of fossil fuels and industrial gases that results in GHG emissions when used. Includes GHG emissions data for facilities that emit or have emitted since 2010 chemicals identified in EPA's CompTox Chemicals Dashboard list of PFAS without explicit structures and list of PFAS structures by DSSTox. PFAS emissions data has been identified for facilities engaged in the following industrial processes: Aluminum Production (GHGRP Subpart F), HCFC-22 Production and HFC-23 Destruction (Subpart O), Electronics Manufacturing (Subpart I), Fluorinated Gas Production (Subpart L), Magnesium Production (Subpart T), Electrical Transmission and Distribution Equipment Use (Subpart DD), and Manufacture of Electric Transmission and Distribution Equipment (Subpart SS). Over time, other industrial processes with required GHGRP reporting may include PFAS emissions data and the list of reportable gases may change over time. BROWNFIELD AREA HAZ WASTE FAC INDIAN LUST INDIAN UST DELISTED INDIAN LST DELISTED INDIAN UST PFAS GHG 195 95 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Government Publication Date: Aug 5, 2024 On-Scene Coordinator Response Sites:rr-OSC RESPONSE-bb This list of On-Scene Coordinator (OSC) Response Sites is provided by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). OSCs are the federal officials responsible for monitoring or directing responses to all oil spills and hazardous substance releases reported to the federal government. OSCs coordinate all federal efforts with, and provide support and information to local, state, and regional response communities. An OSC is an agent of either EPA or the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG), depending on where the incident occurs. EPA's OSCs have primary responsibility for spills and releases to inland areas and waters. USCG OSCs have responsibility for coastal waters and the Great Lakes. In general, an OSC has the following key responsibilities during and after a response: Assessment, Monitoring, Response Assistance, and Evaluation. Government Publication Date: Apr 4, 2024 Facility Registry Service/Facility Index:rr-FINDS/FRS-bb The Facility Registry Service (FRS) is a centrally managed database that identifies facilities, sites, or places subject to environmental regulations or of environmental interest. FRS creates high-quality, accurate, and authoritative facility identification records through rigorous verification and management procedures that incorporate information from program national systems, state master facility records, and data collected from EPA's Central Data Exchange registrations and data management personnel. This list is made available by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date: Aug 1, 2024 Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Program:rr-TRIS-bb The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) is a database containing data on disposal or other releases of toxic chemicals from U.S. facilities and information about how facilities manage those chemicals through recycling, energy recovery, and treatment. There are currently 770 individually listed chemicals and 33 chemical categories covered by the TRI Program. Facilities that manufacture, process or otherwise use these chemicals in amounts above established levels must submit annual reporting forms for each chemical. Note that the TRI chemical list does not include all toxic chemicals used in the U.S. One of TRI's primary purposes is to inform communities about toxic chemical releases to the environment. This database includes TRI Reporting Data for calendar years 1987 through 2021 and Preliminary Data for 2022. Government Publication Date: Sep 20, 2023 PFOA/PFOS Contaminated Sites:rr-PFAS NPL-bb This list of Superfund Sites with Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) detections is made available by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in their PFAS Analytic Tools data, previously the list was obtained by EPA FOIA requests. EPA's Office of Land and Emergency Management and EPA Regional Offices maintain what is known about site investigations, contamination, and remedial actions under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) where PFAS is present in the environment. Limitations: Detections of PFAS at National Priorities List (NPL) sites do not mean that people are at risk from PFAS, are exposed to PFAS, or that the site is the source of the PFAS. The information in the Superfund NPL and Superfund Alternative Agreement (SAA) PFAS detection site list is years old and may not be accurate today. Site information such as site name, site ID, and location has been confirmed for accuracy; however, PFAS-related information such as media sampled, drinking water being above the health advisory, or mitigation efforts has not been verified. For Federal Facilities data, the other Federal agencies (OFA) are the lead agency for their data and provided them to EPA. Government Publication Date: Sep 18, 2024 Federal Agency Locations with Known or Suspected PFAS Detections:rr-PFAS FED SITES-bb List of Federal agency locations with known or suspected detections of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS), made available by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in their PFAS Analytic Tools data. EPA outlines that these data are gathered from several federal entities, such as the Federal Superfund program, Department of Defense (DOD), National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Transportation, and Department of Energy. The dates this data was extracted for the PFAS Analytic Tools range from 2022 to 2024. Sites on this list do not necessarily reflect the source/s of PFAS contamination and detections do not indicate level of risk or human exposure at the site. Agricultural notifications in this data are limited to DOD sites only. At this time, the EPA is aware that this list is not comprehensive of all Federal agencies. Government Publication Date: Jul 22, 2024 SSEHRI PFAS Contamination Sites:rr-PFAS SSEHRI-bb This PFAS Contamination Site Tracker database is compiled by the PFAS Project Lab, part of the Social Science Environmental Health Research Institute (SSEHRI) at Northeastern University. According to the SSEHRI, the database records qualitative and quantitative data from each known site of PFAS contamination, including timeline of discovery, sources, levels, health impacts, community response, and government response. The goal of this database is to compile information and support public understanding of the rapidly unfolding issue of PFAS contamination. All data presented was extracted from government websites, news articles, or publicly available documents. Locations for the Known PFAS Contamination Sites are sourced from the PFAS Sites and Community Resources Map by the PFAS-REACH team, credited to PFAS Project Lab, Silent Spring Institute, and PFAS Exchange. Disclaimer: The source conveys the data undergoes regular updates as new information becomes available, some sites may be missing and/or contain information that is incorrect or outdated, as well as their information represents all contamination sites SSEHRI is aware of, not all possible contamination sites. This data is not intended to be used for legal purposes. Access the following source link for the most current information: https://pfasproject.com/pfas-sites-and-community-resources/ Government Publication Date: Jun 27, 2024 OSC RESPONSE FINDS/FRS TRIS PFAS NPL PFAS FED SITES PFAS SSEHRI 196 96 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 National Response Center PFAS Spills:rr-PFAS ERNS-bb This Per- and Poly-Fluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Spills dataset is made available via the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) PFAS Analytic Tools. The National Response Center (NRC), operated by the U.S. Coast Guard, is the designated federal point of contact for reporting all oil, chemical, and other discharges into the environment, for the United States and its territories. This dataset contains NRC spill information from 1990 to the present that is restricted to records associated with PFAS and PFAS-containing materials. Incidents are filtered to include only records with a "Material Involved" or "Incident Description" related to Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF). The keywords used to filter the data included "AFFF," "Fire Fighting Foam," "Aqueous Film Forming Foam," "Fire Suppressant Foam, "PFAS," "PERFL," "PFOA," "PFOS," and "Genx." Limitations: The data from the NRC website contains initial incident data that has not been validated or investigated by a federal/state response agency. Keyword searches may misidentify some incident reports that do not contain PFAS. This dataset should also not be considered to be exhaustive of all PFAS spills/release incidents. Government Publication Date: Sep 23, 2024 PFAS NPDES Discharge Monitoring:rr-PFAS NPDES-bb This list of National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitted facilities with required monitoring for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl (PFAS) Substances is made available via the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s PFAS Analytic Tools. Any point-source wastewater discharger to waters of the United States must have a NPDES permit, which defines a set of parameters for pollutants and monitoring to ensure that the discharge does not degrade water quality or impair human health. This list includes NPDES permitted facilities associated with permits that monitor for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS), limited to the years 2007 - present. EPA further advises the following regarding these data: currently, fewer than half of states have required PFAS monitoring for at least one of their permittees, and fewer states have established PFAS effluent limits for permittees. For states that may have required monitoring, some reporting and data transfer issues may exist on a state-by-state basis. Government Publication Date: Sep 30, 2024 Perfluorinated Alkyl Substances (PFAS) from Toxic Release Inventory:rr-PFAS TRI-bb List of Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) facilities at which the reported chemical is a per- or polyfluoroalkyl (PFAS) substance included in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) consolidated PFAS Master List of PFAS Substances. Encompasses Toxics Release Inventory records included in the EPA PFAS Analytic Tools. The EPA's TRI database currently tracks information on disposal or releases of 770 individually listed toxic chemicals and 33 chemical categories from thousands of U.S. facilities and details about how facilities manage those chemicals through recycling, energy recovery, and treatment. This listing includes TRI Reporting Data for calendar years 1987 through 2021 and Preliminary Data for 2022. Government Publication Date: Sep 20, 2023 PFAS Water Quality Portal Sampling Data:rr-PFAS WATER-bb This Per- and Poly-Fluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Environmental Media Sampling Data is made available via the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) PFAS Analytic Tools. The Water Quality Portal (WQP), as a cooperative service sponsored by the United States Geological Survey, the EPA, and the National Water Quality Monitoring Council, is part of a modernized repository storing ambient sampling data for all environmental media and tissue samples. A wide range of federal, state, tribal and local governments, academic and non-governmental organizations, and individuals submit project details and sampling results to this public repository. Limitations: EPA did not carry out the sampling or testing of a majority of the data in the WQP PFAS dataset. EPA can only speak to the accuracy and completeness of the data from projects like the National Aquatic Resource Surveys for which EPA is the data owner/organization. Data may exist within the file on Quality Assurance Project Plans (QAPPs) and the approving agency of the QAPP, if a QAPP is entered. Government Publication Date: Jul 22, 2024 PFAS TSCA Manufacture and Import Facilities:rr-PFAS TSCA-bb The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued the Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) Rule under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) and requires chemical manufacturers and facilities that manufacture or import chemical substances to report data to EPA. This list is specific only to TSCA Manufacture and Import Facilities with reported per- and poly-fluoroalkyl (PFAS) substances. Data file is sourced from EPA's PFAS Analytic Tools TSCA dataset which includes CDR/Inventory Update Reporting data from 1998 up to 2020. Disclaimer: This data file includes production and importation data for chemicals identified in EPA's CompTox Chemicals Dashboard list of PFAS without explicit structures and list of PFAS structures in DSSTox. Note that some regulations have specific chemical structure requirements that define PFAS differently than the lists in EPA's CompTox Chemicals Dashboard. Reporting information on manufactured or imported chemical substance amounts should not be compared between facilities, as some companies claim Chemical Data Reporting Rule data fields for PFAS information as Confidential Business Information. Government Publication Date: Jan 5, 2023 PFAS Waste Transfers from RCRA e-Manifest :rr-PFAS E-MANIFEST-bb PFAS ERNS PFAS NPDES PFAS TRI PFAS WATER PFAS TSCA PFAS E-MANIFEST 197 97 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 This Per- and Poly-Fluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Waste Transfers dataset is made available via the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) PFAS Analytic Tools. Every shipment of hazardous waste in the U.S. must be accompanied by a shipment manifest, which is a critical component of the cradle-to-grave tracking of wastes mandated by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). According to the EPA, currently no Federal Waste Code exists for any PFAS compounds. To work around the lack of PFAS waste codes in the RCRA database, EPA developed the PFAS Transfers dataset by mining e-Manifest records containing at least one of these common PFAS keywords: • PFAS • PFOA • PFOS • PERFL • AFFF • GENX • GEN-X (plus the Vermont state-specific waste codes). Limitations: Amount or concentration of PFAS being transferred cannot be determined from the manifest information. Keyword searches may misidentify some manifest records that do not contain PFAS. This dataset should also not be considered to be exhaustive of all PFAS waste transfers. Government Publication Date: Sep 22, 2024 PFAS Industry Sectors:rr-PFAS IND-bb This Per- and Poly-Fluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Industry Sectors dataset is made available via the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) PFAS Analytic Tools. The EPA developed the dataset from various sources that show which industries may be handling PFAS including: EPA's Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO) records restricted to potential PFAS-handling industry sectors; ECHO records for Fire Training Sites identified where fire-fighting foam may have been used in training exercises; and 14 CFR Part 139 Airports compiled from historic and current records from the FAA Airport Data and Information Portal. Since July 2006, all certificated Part 139 Airports are required to have fire-fighting foam onsite that meet certain military specifications, which to date have been fluorinated (Aqueous Film Forming Foam). Limitations: Inclusion in this dataset does not indicate that PFAS are being manufactured, processed, used, or released by the facility. Listed facilities potentially handle PFAS based on their industrial profile, but are unconfirmed by the EPA. Keyword searches in ECHO for Fire Training sites may misidentify some facilities and should not be considered to be an exhaustive list of fire training facilities in the U.S. Government Publication Date: Sep 23, 2024 Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System:rr-HMIRS-bb The Hazardous Materials Incident Reporting System (HMIRS) database contains unintentional hazardous materials release information reported to the U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. Government Publication Date: May 29, 2024 National Clandestine Drug Labs:rr-NCDL-bb The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department"), Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), provides this data as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Government Publication Date: Nov 30, 2023 Toxic Substances Control Act:rr-TSCA-bb The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is amending the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) section 8(a) Inventory Update Reporting (IUR) rule and changing its name to the Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) rule. The CDR enables EPA to collect and publish information on the manufacturing, processing, and use of commercial chemical substances and mixtures (referred to hereafter as chemical substances) on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory (TSCA Inventory). This includes current information on chemical substance production volumes, manufacturing sites, and how the chemical substances are used. This information helps the Agency determine whether people or the environment are potentially exposed to reported chemical substances. EPA publishes submitted CDR data that is not Confidential Business Information (CBI). EPA CDR collections occur approximately every four years and reporting requirements change per collection. Government Publication Date: May 12, 2022 Hist TSCA:rr-HIST TSCA-bb The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is amending the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) section 8(a) Inventory Update Reporting (IUR) rule and changing its name to the Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) rule. The 2006 IUR data summary report includes information about chemicals manufactured or imported in quantities of 25,000 pounds or more at a single site during calendar year 2005. In addition to the basic manufacturing information collected in previous reporting cycles, the 2006 cycle is the first time EPA collected information to characterize exposure during manufacturing, processing and use of organic chemicals. The 2006 cycle also is the first time manufacturers of inorganic chemicals were required to report basic manufacturing information. Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2006 FTTS Administrative Case Listing:rr-FTTS ADMIN-bb An administrative case listing from the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), together known as FTTS. This database was obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) National Compliance Database (NCDB). The FTTS and NCDB was shut down in 2006. Government Publication Date: Jan 19, 2007 PFAS IND HMIRS NCDL TSCA HIST TSCA FTTS ADMIN 198 98 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 FTTS Inspection Case Listing:rr-FTTS INSP-bb An inspection case listing from the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), together known as FTTS. This database was obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) National Compliance Database (NCDB). The FTTS and NCDB was shut down in 2006. Government Publication Date: Jan 19, 2007 Potentially Responsible Parties List:rr-PRP-bb Early in the site cleanup process, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) conducts a search to find the Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs). The EPA looks for evidence to determine liability by matching wastes found at the site with parties that may have contributed wastes to the site. This listing contains PRPs, Noticed Parties, at sites in the EPA's Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS). Government Publication Date: Jul 24, 2024 State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing:rr-SCRD DRYCLEANER-bb The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners (SCRD) was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. Coalition members are states with mandated programs and funding for drycleaner site remediation. Current members are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. Since 2017, the SCRD no longer maintains this data, refer to applicable state source data where available. Government Publication Date: Nov 08, 2017 Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS):rr-ICIS-bb The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) database contains integrated enforcement and compliance information across most of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) programs. The vision for ICIS is to replace EPA's independent databases that contain enforcement data with a single repository for that information. Currently, ICIS contains all Federal Administrative and Judicial enforcement actions and a subset of the Permit Compliance System (PCS), which supports the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). This information is maintained by the EPA Headquarters and at the Regional offices. A future release of ICIS will completely replace PCS and will integrate that information with Federal actions already in the system. ICIS also has the capability to track other activities that support compliance and enforcement programs, including incident tracking, compliance assistance, and compliance monitoring. Government Publication Date: Apr 13, 2024 Drycleaner Facilities:rr-FED DRYCLEANERS-bb A list of drycleaner facilities from Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO) data as made available by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), sourced from the ECHO Exporter file. The EPA tracks facilities that possess NAIC and SIC codes that classify businesses as drycleaner establishments. Government Publication Date: May 5, 2024 Delisted Drycleaner Facilities:rr-DELISTED FED DRY-bb List of sites removed from the list of Drycleaner Facilities (sites in the EPA's Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) with NAIC or SIC codes identifying the business as a drycleaner establishment). Government Publication Date: May 5, 2024 Formerly Used Defense Sites:rr-FUDS-bb Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS) are properties that were formerly owned by, leased to, or otherwise possessed by and under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Defense prior to October 1986, where the Department of Defense (DOD) is responsible for an environmental restoration. The FUDS Annual Report to Congress (ARC) is published by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). This data is compiled from the USACE's Geospatial FUDS data layers and Homeland Infrastructure Foundation-Level Data (HIFLD) FUDS dataset which applies to the Fiscal Year 2021 FUDS Inventory. Government Publication Date: May 15, 2023 FUDS Munitions Response Sites:rr-FUDS MRS-bb Boundaries of Munitions Response Sites (MRS), published with the Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS) Annual Report to Congress (ARC) by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). An MRS is a discrete location within a Munitions response area (MRA) that is known to require a munitions response. An MRA means any area on a defense site that is known or suspected to contain unexploded ordnance (UXO), discarded military munitions (DMM), or munitions constituents (MC). This data is compiled from the USACE's Geospatial MRS data layers and Homeland Infrastructure Foundation- Level Data (HIFLD) MRS dataset. Government Publication Date: May 15, 2023 Former Military Nike Missile Sites:rr-FORMER NIKE-bb FTTS INSP PRP SCRD DRYCLEANER ICIS FED DRYCLEANERS DELISTED FED DRY FUDS FUDS MRS FORMER NIKE 199 99 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 This information was taken from report DRXTH-AS-IA-83A016 (Historical Overview of the Nike Missile System, 12/1984) which was performed by Environmental Science and Engineering, Inc. for the U.S. Army Toxic and Hazardous Materials Agency Assessment Division. The Nike system was deployed between 1954 and the mid-1970's. Among the substances used or stored on Nike sites were liquid missile fuel (JP-4); starter fluids (UDKH, aniline, and furfuryl alcohol); oxidizer (IRFNA); hydrocarbons (motor oil, hydraulic fluid, diesel fuel, gasoline, heating oil); solvents (carbon tetrachloride, trichloroethylene, trichloroethane, stoddard solvent); and battery electrolyte. The quantities of material a disposed of and procedures for disposal are not documented in published reports. Virtually all information concerning the potential for contamination at Nike sites is confined to personnel who were assigned to Nike sites. During deactivation most hardware was shipped to depot-level supply points. There were reportedly instances where excess materials were disposed of on or near the site itself at closure. There was reportedly no routine site decontamination. Government Publication Date: Dec 2, 1984 PHMSA Pipeline Safety Flagged Incidents:rr-PIPELINE INCIDENT-bb This list of flagged pipeline incidents is made available by the U.S. Department of Transportation (US DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA). PHMSA regulations require incident and accident reports for five different pipeline system types. Accidents reported on hazardous liquid gravity lines (§195.13) and reporting-regulated-only hazardous liquid gathering lines (§195.15) and incidents reported on Type R gas gathering (§192.8(c)) are not included in the flagged incident file data. Government Publication Date: May 6, 2024 Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS):rr-MLTS-bb A list of sites that store radioactive material subject to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing requirements. This list is maintained by the NRC. As of September 2016, the NRC no longer releases location information for sites. Site locations were last received in July 2016. Government Publication Date: May 11, 2021 Historic Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS) sites:rr-HIST MLTS-bb A historic list of sites that have inactive licenses and/or removed from the Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS). In some cases, a site is removed from the MLTS when the state becomes an "Agreement State". An Agreement State is a State that has signed an agreement with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) authorizing the State to regulate certain uses of radioactive materials within the State. Government Publication Date: Jan 31, 2010 Mines Master Index File:rr-MINES-bb The Master Index File (MIF) is provided by the United States Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA). This file, which was originally created in the 1970's, contained many Mine-IDs that were invalid. MSHA removes invalid IDs from the MIF upon discovery. MSHA applicable data includes the following: all Coal and Metal/Non-Metal mines under MSHA's jurisdiction since 1/1/1970; mine addresses for all mines in the database except for Abandoned mines prior to 1998 from MSHA's legacy system (addresses may or may not correspond with the physical location of the mine itself); violations that have been assessed penalties as a result of MSHA inspections beginning on 1/1/2000; and violations issued as a result of MSHA inspections conducted beginning on 1/1/2000. Government Publication Date: Feb 5, 2024 Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act Sites:rr-SMCRA-bb This inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily legacy coal mining operations) is maintained by the U.S. Department of the Interior's Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSMRE), as it provides information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). This inventory contains information on the type and extent of Abandoned Mine Land (AML) Problems, as well as information on the cost associated with the reclamation of those problems. The data is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing problems are reclaimed. Disclaimer: Per the OSMRE, States and tribes who enter their data into e-AMLIS (AML Inventory System) may truncate their latitude and longitude so the precise location of usually dangerous AMLs is not revealed in an effort to protect the public from searching for these AMLs, most of which are on private property. If more precise location information is needed, please contact the applicable state/tribe of interest. Government Publication Date: May 20, 2024 Mineral Resource Data System:rr-MRDS-bb The Mineral Resource Data System (MRDS) is a collection of reports describing metallic and nonmetallic mineral resources throughout the world. Included are deposit name, location, commodity, deposit description, geologic characteristics, production, reserves, resources, and references. This database contains the records previously provided in the Mineral Resource Data System (MRDS) of USGS and the Mineral Availability System/Mineral Industry Locator System (MAS/MILS) originated in the U.S. Bureau of Mines, which is now part of USGS. The USGS has ceased systematic updates of the MRDS database with their focus more recently on deposits of critical minerals while providing a well-documented baseline of historical mine locations from USGS topographic maps. Government Publication Date: Mar 15, 2016 DOE Legacy Management Sites:rr-LM SITES-bb PIPELINE INCIDENT MLTS HIST MLTS MINES SMCRA MRDS LM SITES 200 100 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) currently manages radioactive and chemical waste, environmental contamination, and hazardous material at over 100 sites across the U.S. The LM manages sites with diverse regulatory drivers (statutes or programs that direct cleanup and management requirements at DOE sites) or as part of internal DOE or congressionally-recognized programs, such as but not limited to: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP), Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA Title I, Tile II), Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), Decontamination and Decommissioning (D&D), Nuclear Waste Policy Act (NWPA). This site listing includes data exported from the DOE Office of LM' s Geospatial Environmental Mapping System (GEMS). GEMS Data disclaimer: The DOE Office of LM makes no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, regarding the use, accuracy, availability, or completeness of the data presented herein. Government Publication Date: Dec 12, 2023 Alternative Fueling Stations:rr-ALT FUELS-bb This list of alternative fueling stations is sourced from the Alternative Fuels Data Center (AFDC). The U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy launched the AFDC in 1991 as a repository for alternative fuel vehicle performance data, which provides a wealth of information and data on alternative and renewable fuels, advanced vehicles, fuel-saving strategies, and emerging transportation technologies. The data includes Biodiesel (B20 and above), Compressed Natural Gas (CNG), Electric, Ethanol (E85), Hydrogen, Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), Propane (LPG), and Renewable Diesel (R20 and above) fuel type locations. Government Publication Date: Aug 29, 2024 Superfunds Consent Decrees:rr-CONSENT DECREES-bb This list of Superfund consent decrees is provided by the Department of Justice, Environment & Natural Resources Division (ENRD) through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) applicable file. This listing includes Cases filed since 2010 limited to the following: Consent Decrees for CERCLA or Superfund Sites filed and/or as proposed within the ENRD's Case Management System (CMS); and applicable ENRD's Environmental Defense Section (EDS) CERCLA Cases with "Consent" in History Note. CMS may not reflect the latest developments in a case, nor can the agency guarantee the accuracy of the data. ENRD Disclaimer: Congress excluded three discrete categories of law enforcement and national security records from the requirements of the FOIA; response is limited to those records that are subject to the requirements of the FOIA; however, this should not be taken as an indication that excluded records do, or do not, exist. Government Publication Date: Jun 26, 2024 Air Facility System:rr-AFS-bb This EPA retired Air Facility System (AFS) dataset contains emissions, compliance, and enforcement data on stationary sources of air pollution. Regulated sources cover a wide spectrum; from large industrial facilities to relatively small operations such as dry cleaners. AFS does not contain data on facilities that are solely asbestos demolition and/or renovation contractors, or landfills. ECHO Clean Air Act data from AFS are frozen and reflect data as of October 17, 2014; the EPA retired this system for Clean Air Act stationary sources and transitioned to ICIS-Air. Government Publication Date: Oct 17, 2014 Registered Pesticide Establishments:rr-SSTS-bb This national list of active EPA-registered foreign and domestic pesticide and/or device-producing establishments is based on data from the Section Seven Tracking System (SSTS). The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) Section 7 requires that each producing establishment must place its EPA establishment number on the label or immediate container of each pesticide, active ingredient or device produced. An EPA establishment number on a pesticide product label identifies the EPA registered location where the product was produced. The list of establishments is made available by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date: Feb 29, 2024 Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) Transformers:rr-PCBT-bb Locations of Transformers Containing Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) registered with the United States Environmental Protection Agency. PCB transformer owners must register their transformer(s) with EPA. Although not required, PCB transformer owners who have removed and properly disposed of a registered PCB transformer may notify EPA to have their PCB transformer de-registered. Data made available by EPA. Government Publication Date: Oct 15, 2019 Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) Notifiers:rr-PCB-bb Facilities included in the national list of facilities that have notified the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) activities. Any company or person storing, transporting or disposing of PCBs or conducting PCB research and development must notify the EPA and receive an identification number. Government Publication Date: May 23, 2024 Power Plants:rr-POWER PLANTS-bb This list of power plants is provided by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). The listing includes operable electric generating plants in the United States by energy source, originating from the EIA-860, Annual Electric Generator Report; EIA-860M, Monthly Update to the Annual Electric Generator Report; and EIA-923, Power Plant Operations Report. It includes all operable plants by energy source with a combined nameplate capacity of 1 megawatt or more that are operating, are on standby, or out of service for short- or long-term. ALT FUELS CONSENT DECREES AFS SSTS PCBT PCB POWER PLANTS 201 101 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 Government Publication Date: Apr 15, 2024 State Historic Potential Business Activity Risk:rr-HIST RISK-bb Proprietary list of sites identified as potentially having engaged in business activity that poses a higher-than-normal risk of contamination. Records originate from historical city directories, and are included in this list based on broad business categories Potentially Hazardous Chemical Users and Fuel and Automotive, including but not limited to Dry Cleaners and Fuel Stations, Garages, etc. Inclusion in this listing does not indicate that there is or ever has been contamination; rather, sites are included in this list due to their potential for having engaged in a business activity presenting an elevated risk of contamination. The list was compiled from various city directories including Polks, Millers, Mullin Kille, Interstate Directory, and State Directory Co; spanning roughly 1920s through 1960 depending on information available by city. Government Publication Date: Jan 1, 1960 Priority Ranking List:rr-PRIORITYCLEAN-bb The Florida Legislature has established a state-funded program to cleanup properties that are contaminated as a result of the operations of a drycleaning facility or wholesale supply facility (Chapter 376, Florida Statutes). The program is administered by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). The statute was sponsored by the drycleaning industry to address environmental, economic, and liability issues resulting from drycleaning solvent contamination. The program provides limited liability protection to the owner, operator and real property owner of drycleaning or wholesale supply facilities for cleanup of drycleaning solvent contamination if the parties meet the eligibility conditions stated in the law. Government Publication Date: Oct 22, 2024 Dry Cleaning Facilities:rr-DRYCLEANERS-bb A listing of dry cleaning facilities registered with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). The information contains facility identification number, site location information, related party (owner) information, and facility type and status. Data is taken from the Storage Tank & Contamination Monitoring database, the registration repository of dry cleaner facility data. Government Publication Date: Apr 29, 2024 Delisted Dry Cleaning Facilities:rr-DELISTED DRYCLEANERS-bb List of sites removed from the drycleaners database made available by the Florida Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC). Government Publication Date: Apr 29, 2024 Historical Dry Cleaners:rr-HISTORICAL DRYC-bb The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) provided this historical database of regulated and non-regulated dry cleaning facilities. These facilities were at one time tracked and registered by the FDEP OCULUS Electronic Document Management System as "drums" in the underground storage tank database. Government Publication Date: Aug 2, 2013 Oil and Hazardous Materials Incidents:rr-SPILLS-bb Statewide listing of oil and hazardous materials spills and incidents recorded by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). Government Publication Date: Sep 4, 2024 Contaminated Sites:rr-DWM CONTAM-bb Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Division of Waste Management (DWM) listing of active or known sites that include sites requiring cleanup but are not actively being worked on due to the agency's lack of funding (primarily petroleum and drycleaning). Government Publication Date: Jul 14, 2023 Delisted Contaminated Sites:rr-DEL CONTAM SITE-bb List of sites which were once included on the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Division of Waste Management (DWM)'s Contaminated Sites list. As sites on the Contaminated Sites (CS) list are cleaned up or closed under risk based corrective action, they are removed from the CS list. Government Publication Date: Sep 30, 2015 Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF):rr-PFAS AFFF-bb A list of fire fighter training facilities that use or possibly used Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF). This list is made available by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). Government Publication Date: Jan 30, 2024 HIST RISK PRIORITYCLEAN DRYCLEANERS DELISTED DRYCLEANERS HISTORICAL DRYC SPILLS DWM CONTAM DEL CONTAM SITE PFAS AFFF 202 102 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 PFAS Investigation at Federal Facilities:rr-PFAS-bb List of sites - including Federal Facilities - in Florida at which either a) there has been confirmed or suspected usage of Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF), or b) the Division of Waste Management has identified as a potential source or environmental impact related to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) is committed to the protection of the groundwater resources of the state and the public health and safety of residents. The DEP will continue its efforts to investigate and understand PFAS in the environment and the ecological and human health risks associated with PFAS contamination. Listings made available by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). Government Publication Date: Nov 11, 2024 Ground Water Contamination Areas:rr-GW CONTAM-bb List of areas of known groundwater contamination made available by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). 38 counties have been delineated primarily for the agricultural pesticide ethylene dibromide (EDB), and to a much lesser extent, volatile organic and petroleum contaminants. Permitted water wells in these areas must meet specific well construction criteria and water testing prior to well use. This dataset only indicates the presence or absence of specific groundwater contaminants and does not represent all known sources of groundwater contamination in the state of Florida. Government Publication Date: Jul 12, 2023 Underground Injection Control Wells:rr-UIC-bb Class I Underground Injection Control (UIC) wells that are currently or were previously active, as well as proposed sites, regulated by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). Class I UIC wells are used to inject nonhazardous waste, hazardous waste (new hazardous waste wells were banned in 1983), or municipal waste below the lowermost underground source of drinking water. Government Publication Date: Sep 9, 2024 Well Surveillance Program Facilities:rr-WELL SURVEILLANCE-bb List of facilities made available by the Florida Health Well Surveillance group. The Well Surveillance group manages several programs to identify and monitor areas in Florida where contaminated drinking water is suspected and may pose a threat to public health. The section coordinates with the County Health Departments (CHDs) to locate potable wells and conduct water sampling for contaminants of concern. The Well Surveillance Section is composed of the State Underground Petroleum Environmental Response Act (SUPER Act), Drinking Water Toxics Program (Toxics), Drycleaner Solvent Cleanup Program (DSCP). Includes locations of known cattle dipping vats. Government Publication Date: Jul 22, 2024 Cattle Dip Vats:rr-CDV SOUTHEAST-bb A list of Cattle Dip Vats in Southeast Florida made available by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Government Publication Date: Jan 19, 2017 Tier 2 Report:rr-TIER 2-bb A list of Tier 2 facilities in the state of Florida. The list tracks the inventory of chemicals within a particular facility. This list is provided by the Florida Division of Emergency Management. Government Publication Date: Apr 2, 2024 Delisted County Records:rr-DELISTED COUNTY-bb Records removed from county databases. Records may be removed from the county lists made available by the respective county departments because they are inactive, or because they have been deemed to be below reportable thresholds. Government Publication Date: Aug 27, 2024 Tribal No Tribal additional environmental record sources available for this State. County No County additional environmental databases were selected to be included in the search. PFAS GW CONTAM UIC WELL SURVEILLANCE CDV SOUTHEAST TIER 2 DELISTED COUNTY 203 103 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24112100943 h-Definitions Database Descriptions:This section provides a detailed explanation for each database including: source, information available, time coverage, and acronyms used. They are listed in alphabetic order. Detail Report:This is the section of the report which provides the most detail for each individual record. Records are summarized by location, starting with the project property followed by records in closest proximity. Distance:The distance value is the distance between plotted points, not necessarily the distance between the sites' boundaries. All values are an approximation. Direction: The direction value is the compass direction of the site in respect to the project property and/or center point of the report. Elevation:The elevation value is taken from the location at which the records for the site address have been plotted. All values are an approximation. Source: Google Elevation API. Executive Summary:This portion of the report is divided into 3 sections: 'Report Summary'- Displays a chart indicating how many records fall on the project property and, within the report search radii. 'Site Report Summary'-Project Property'- This section lists all the records which fall on the project property. For more details, see the 'Detail Report' section. 'Site Report Summary-Surrounding Properties'- This section summarizes all records on adjacent properties, listing them in order of proximity from the project property. For more details, see the 'Detail Report' section. Map Key:The map key number is assigned according to closest proximity from the project property. Map Key numbers always start at #1. The project property will always have a map key of '1' if records are available. If there is a number in brackets beside the main number, this will indicate the number of records on that specific property. If there is no number in brackets, there is only one record for that property. The symbol and colour used indicates 'elevation': the red inverted triangle will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Lower Elevation', the yellow triangle will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Higher Elevation' and the orange square will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Same Elevation.' Unplottables:These are records that could not be mapped due to various reasons, including limited geographic information. These records may or may not be in your study area, and are included as reference. Definitions 204 APPENDIX C HISTORICAL DOCUMENTS 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 Project Property:7Brew - Winter Springs Michael Blake Boulevard Winter Springs,FL 32708 Project No:240803190.00 Requested By:TTL, Inc. Order No:24112100943 Date Completed:December 03, 2024 227 December 03, 2024 RE: CITY DIRECTORY RESEARCH Michael Blake Boulevard Winter Springs,FL 32708 Thank you for contacting ERIS for an City Directory Search for the site described above. Our staff has conducted a reverse listing City Directory search to determine prior occupants of the subject site and adjacent properties. We have provided the nearest addresses(s) when adjacent addresses are not listed. If we have searched a range of addresses, all addresses in that range found in the Directory are included. Note: Reverse Listing Directories generally are focused on more highly developed areas. Newly developed areas may be covered in the more recent years, but the older directories will tend to cover only the "central" parts of the city. To complete the search, we have either utilized the ACPL, Library of Congress, State Archives, and/or a regional library or history center as well as multiple digitized directories. These do not claim to be a complete collection of all reverse listing city directories produced. ERIS has made every effort to provide accurate and complete information but shall not be held liable for missing, incomplete or inaccurate information. To complete this search we used the general range(s) below to search for relevant findings. If you believe there are additional addresses or streets that require searching please contact us at 866-517-5204. Search Criteria: 1200-1400 of E State Rd 434 All of Michael Blake Blvd Search Notes: E State Rd 434 is also known as 1200-1400 Longwood Oviedo Rd in Winter Springs. 228 Search Results Summary Date Source Comment 2023 DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY 2020 DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY 2016 DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY 2012 DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY 2008 DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY 2003 DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY 2000 DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY 1996 CITY PUBLISHING CO 1990 CITY PUBLISHING CO 1986 POLKS 1981 POLKS 1976 POLKS 1972 POLKS 1968 POLKS 229 2023 E STATE RD 434 SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY 2023 MICHAEL BLAKE BLVD SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY Page: 3 Report ID: 24112100943 - 12/03/2024 www.erisinfo.com 1200 MC DONALD'S...CAFES 1200 MC DONALD'S...RESTAURANTS 1200 MC DONALD'S...FOODS-CARRY OUT 1205 WINTER SPRINGS MOBIL...OIL & GAS PRODUCERS 1205 WINTER SPRINGS MOBIL...SERVICE STATIONS-GASOLINE & OIL 1205 WINTER SPRINGS MOBIL...ALTERNATIVE FUELS 1220 STARBUCKS...COFFEE SHOPS 80 SAVOY GRACIOUS RETIRE LIVING...RESIDENTIAL CARE HOMES 151 BLAKE APARTMENTS...REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS 300 LAURA PERSONS...RESIDENTIAL 304 RAMABUJJAYYA TALLURI...RESIDENTIAL 324 MICHAEL WHITE...RESIDENTIAL 352 ALISSA MOY...RESIDENTIAL 360 CHRISTIAN SARNA...RESIDENTIAL 396 BETHANY MC CABE...RESIDENTIAL 230 2020 E STATE RD 434 SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY 2020 MICHAEL BLAKE BLVD SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY Page: 4 Report ID: 24112100943 - 12/03/2024 www.erisinfo.com 1200 MC DONALD'S...CAFES 1200 MC DONALD'S...RESTAURANTS 1200 MC DONALD'S...FOODS-CARRY OUT 1205 WINTER SPRINGS MOBIL...OIL & GAS PRODUCERS 1205 WINTER SPRINGS MOBIL...SERVICE STATIONS-GASOLINE & OIL 1205 WINTER SPRINGS MOBIL...ALTERNATIVE FUELS 1220 STARBUCKS...COFFEE SHOPS 151 BLAKE APARTMENTS...REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS 304 RAMABUJJAYYA TALLURI...RESIDENTIAL 324 MICHAEL WHITE...RESIDENTIAL 396 BETHANY MC CABE...RESIDENTIAL 231 2016 E STATE RD 434 SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY 2016 MICHAEL BLAKE BLVD SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY Page: 5 Report ID: 24112100943 - 12/03/2024 www.erisinfo.com 1200 MC DONALD'S...RESTAURANTS 1200 MC DONALD'S...FOODS-CARRY OUT 1205 ATM...AUTOMATED TELLER MACHINES 1205 WINTER SPRINGS MOBIL...ALTERNATIVE FUELS 1205 WINTER SPRINGS MOBIL...SERVICE STATIONS-GASOLINE & OIL 304 RAMABUJJAYYA TALLURI...RESIDENTIAL 356 CHRISTA VAUGHAN...RESIDENTIAL 396 BETHANY MC CABE...RESIDENTIAL 396 DON MC CABE...RESIDENTIAL 232 2012 E STATE RD 434 SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY 2012 MICHAEL BLAKE BLVD SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY Page: 6 Report ID: 24112100943 - 12/03/2024 www.erisinfo.com 1200 MC DONALD'S...RESTAURANTS 1200 MCDONALDS...EATING PLACE 1205 7-ELEVEN...CONVENIENCE STORES 1205 WINTER SPRINGS MOBIL...SERVICE STATIONS-GASOLINE & OIL 1206 TUTTI FRUTTI FROZEN YOGURT...YOGURT NO LISTING FOUND 233 2008 E STATE RD 434 SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY 2008 MICHAEL BLAKE BLVD SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY Page: 7 Report ID: 24112100943 - 12/03/2024 www.erisinfo.com 1200 MCDONALDS...EATING PLACE NO LISTING FOUND 234 2003 E STATE RD 434 SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY 2003 MICHAEL BLAKE BLVD SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY Page: 8 Report ID: 24112100943 - 12/03/2024 www.erisinfo.com NO LISTING FOUND NO LISTING FOUND 235 2000 E STATE RD 434 SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY 2000 MICHAEL BLAKE BLVD SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY Page: 9 Report ID: 24112100943 - 12/03/2024 www.erisinfo.com NO LISTING FOUND NO LISTING FOUND 236 1996 E STATE RD 434 SOURCE: CITY PUBLISHING CO 1996 MICHAEL BLAKE BLVD SOURCE: CITY PUBLISHING CO Page: 10 Report ID: 24112100943 - 12/03/2024 www.erisinfo.com STREET NOT LISTED 237 1990 E STATE RD 434 SOURCE: CITY PUBLISHING CO 1990 MICHAEL BLAKE BLVD SOURCE: CITY PUBLISHING CO Page: 11 Report ID: 24112100943 - 12/03/2024 www.erisinfo.com STREET NOT LISTED 238 1986 E STATE RD 434 SOURCE: POLKS 1986 MICHAEL BLAKE BLVD SOURCE: POLKS Page: 12 Report ID: 24112100943 - 12/03/2024 www.erisinfo.com RANGE NOT LISTED STREET NOT LISTED 239 1981 E STATE RD 434 SOURCE: POLKS 1981 MICHAEL BLAKE BLVD SOURCE: POLKS Page: 13 Report ID: 24112100943 - 12/03/2024 www.erisinfo.com RANGE NOT LISTED STREET NOT LISTED 240 1976 E STATE RD 434 SOURCE: POLKS 1976 MICHAEL BLAKE BLVD SOURCE: POLKS Page: 14 Report ID: 24112100943 - 12/03/2024 www.erisinfo.com RANGE NOT LISTED STREET NOT LISTED 241 1972 E STATE RD 434 SOURCE: POLKS 1972 MICHAEL BLAKE BLVD SOURCE: POLKS Page: 15 Report ID: 24112100943 - 12/03/2024 www.erisinfo.com RANGE NOT LISTED STREET NOT LISTED 242 1968 E STATE RD 434 SOURCE: POLKS 1968 MICHAEL BLAKE BLVD SOURCE: POLKS Page: 16 Report ID: 24112100943 - 12/03/2024 www.erisinfo.com RANGE NOT LISTED STREET NOT LISTED 243 Project Property:7Brew - Winter Springs Michael Blake Boulevard Winter Springs FL 32708 Project No: 240803190.00 Requested By: TTL, Inc. Order No: 24112100943 Date Completed: November 25, 2024 Please note that no information was found for your site or adjacent properties. 244 Project Property: Project No: Requested By: Order No: Date Completed: 7Brew - Winter Springs Michael Blake Boulevard Winter Springs FL 32708 240803190.00 TTL, Inc. 24112100943 November 25, 2024 245 Topographic Map Symbology for the maps may be available in the following documents: Pre-1947 1947-2009 2009-present Topographic Maps included in this report are produced by the USGS and are to be used for research purposes including a phase I report. Maps are not to be resold as commercial property. No warranty of Accuracy or Liability for ERIS: The information contained in this report has been produced by ERIS Information Inc.(in the US) and ERIS Information Limited Partnership (in Canada), both doing business as 'ERIS', using Topographic Maps produced by the USGS. This maps contained herein does not purport to be and does not constitute a guarantee of the accuracy of the information contained herein. Although ERIS has endeavored to present you with information that is accurate, ERIS disclaims, any and all liability for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in such information and data, whether attributable to inadvertence, negligence or otherwise, and for any consequences arising therefrom. Liability on the part of ERIS is limited to the monetary value paid for this report. Page 223 of 1918 Topographic Instructions Page 130 of 1928 Topographic Instructions Topographic Map Symbols US Topo Map Symbols We have searched USGS collections of current topographic maps and historical topographic maps for the project property. Below is a list of maps found for the project property and adjacent area. Maps are from 7.5 and 15 minute topographic map series, if available. Year Map Series 2021 7.5 2015 7.5 1994 7.5 1980 7.5 1972 7.5 1970 7.5 1962 7.5 246 2021 Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Order No. 24112100943 0 0.25 0.50.125 Miles Casselberry, FLOviedo, FL ¯ Available Quadrangle(s): Casselberry Ov i e d o 247 2015 Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Order No. 24112100943 0 0.25 0.50.125 Miles Casselberry, FLOviedo, FL ¯ Available Quadrangle(s): Casselberry Ov i e d o 248 (1-1994)Aerial Photo Year: 1994 (2-1980)Aerial Photo Year: 1977Photo Revision Year: 19801994 Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Order No. 24112100943 0 0.25 0.50.125 Miles Casselberry, FL(1-1994)Oviedo, FL(2-1980) ¯ Available Quadrangle(s): Casselberry Ov i e d o 249 (1-1980)Aerial Photo Year: 1977Photo Revision Year: 1980 (2-1980)Aerial Photo Year: 1977Photo Revision Year: 19801980 Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Order No. 24112100943 0 0.25 0.50.125 Miles Casselberry, FL(1-1980)Oviedo, FL(2-1980) ¯ Available Quadrangle(s): Casselberry Ov i e d o 250 (1-1970)Aerial Photo Year: 1970Photo Revision Year: 1970 (2-1972)Aerial Photo Year: 1970Photo Revision Year: 19721972 Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Order No. 24112100943 0 0.25 0.50.125 Miles Casselberry, FL(2-1972)Oviedo, FL(1-1970) ¯ Available Quadrangle(s): Casselberry Ov i e d o 251 (1-1970)Aerial Photo Year: 1970Photo Revision Year: 1970 (2-1970)Aerial Photo Year: 1970Photo Revision Year: 19701970 Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Order No. 24112100943 0 0.25 0.50.125 Miles Casselberry, FL(1-1970)Oviedo, FL(2-1970) ¯ Available Quadrangle(s): Casselberry Ov i e d o 252 (1-1962)Aerial Photo Year: 19581962 Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Order No. 24112100943 0 0.25 0.50.125 Miles Casselberry, FL(1-1962) ¯ Available Quadrangle(s): Casselberry Ov i e d o 253 APPENDIX D SITE PHOTOGRAPHS 254 Site Photographs TTL Project No. 240803190 7Brew ● Winter Springs, Lake County, Florida Photos taken December 2, 2024 Photo 1 – View of the subject property, facing southeast. Photo 2 – View of the subject property, facing north. 255 Site Photographs TTL Project No. 240803190 7Brew ● Winter Springs, Lake County, Florida Photos taken December 2, 2024 Photo 3 – View of the subject property, facing east. Photo 4 – View of the subject property, facing northwest. 256 Site Photographs TTL Project No. 240803190 7Brew ● Winter Springs, Lake County, Florida Photos taken December 2, 2024 Photo 5 – View of the northern adjoining properties. Photo 6 – View of the western adjoining property. 257 Site Photographs TTL Project No. 240803190 7Brew ● Winter Springs, Lake County, Florida Photos taken December 2, 2024 Photo 7 – View of the area to the west of the subject property, facing north. 258 APPENDIX E ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL RÉSUMÉS 259 Zach Blair, PG, TN QHP Project Professional Environmental Services Zach’s environmental experience includes Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments, Brownfield Redevelopment, NEPA, stream/wetland delineations, protected species studies, asbestos inspections, mold/moisture inspections, erosion prevention, and noise studies. EXPERIENCE 7 years EDUCATION BS, Geoscience-Geology Middle Tennessee State University MS, Geoscience- Environmental Geosystems, Middle Tennessee State University REGISTRATIONS & CERTIFICATIONS Licensed Professional Geologist, Tennessee #5932 Tennessee Qualified Hydrologic Professional Tennessee Asbestos Inspector Alabama Accredited Asbestos Professional TDEC Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Level 1 & Level 2 #138218 OSHA 10 HR OSHA 30 HR OSHA 40 HR HAZWOPER Smith System Driver Safety Seminar KEY PROJECTS Phase I ESAs • MAPCO Gas Stations, TN and KY: Performed a Phase I ESA of 51 sites as part of a 319-site portfolio within a 90-day due-diligence period. • 500-acre property, Overton County, TN: Project professional. TTL performed a Phase I ESA of a 500-acre property in Overton County, TN for what would become a stream and wetland mitigation bank. Environmental issues associated with the property included abandoned oil pump jacks. • Mazda Dealership, Murfreesboro, TN: Project professional. Performed a Phase I ESA of an automotive dealership to verify compliance prior to a real estate transaction. • Safe Harbor, Portland, TN: Project professional. Conducted a Phase I ESA of an agricultural property that formerly operated as a peach orchard. Project led to a Limited Phase II ESA due to an extensive history of agricultural processes. Phase II ESAs • West Main Street, Lebanon, TN: Project professional. Performed a Phase II ESA of a commercial property in Lebanon, TN that had three unregistered underground storage tanks (USTs). Scope of work consisted of a GPR study to locate the tanks, as well as soil and groundwater sampling. • TCW, 2022, GA: Project professional. Performed a Phase II ESA of a property that had a history of brick manufacturing. Scope of work consisted of identifying the location of the manufacturing area and conducting soil sampling. • Gray Media, Independence, OH: Project professional. Performed a Phase II ESA of a property with a history of smelting operations. Scope of work consisted of soil sampling to identify the presence of slag and investigate subsurface impacts. • 7-Eleven, Denver, CO: Project professional. Performed a Phase II ESA of a commercial gas station. Scope of work consisted of soil and groundwater sampling to investigate potential subsurface impacts Asbestos • Mount Moriah Road, Memphis, TN: Project professional. Performed an asbestos survey and renovation of 11 apartment buildings prior to renovation. • Old Hickory Community Center, Old Hickory, TN: Project professional. Conducted an asbestos survey of the local community center prior to its renovation. Project also involved oversight of asbestos abatement. • Wimpole Drive, Nashville, TN : Project professional. Conducted a survey of asbestos 260 ZACH BLAIR, PG, TN QHP, PAGE 2 and other regulated materials of a bundle of houses as part of an overall flood relief project with the Metro- Nashville Government. • TDOT Tract 26, Memphis, TN: Project professional. Performed an asbestos survey of an abandened night club and commercial warehouse as part of a realignment project of Lamar Avenue in Memphis, TN. Mold • Southerland Place, Brentwood, TN: Project professional. Conducted mold sampling and moisture mapping of an assisted living facility following pipe burst due to freezing temperatures. Follow-up sampling was also conducted after remediation efforts were completed. • The Villages of Farragut Assisted Living Facility Mold Assessment and Remediation, Farragut, TN: Project professional. Performed a Limited Mold Assessment of a multi-story building under construction that included visual observations, moisture meter readings, indoor air quality samples, and swab samples of surfaces that were potentially contaminated. After a laboratory analysis indicated mold growth throughout the structure, Zach worked with a remediation specialist to inspect completed remediation efforts. • Rock Harbor Condominiums Sampling, Nashville, TN: Project professional. Performed an emergency response sampling for two condominium buildings (20 total units) that had undergone fire damage. Sampling included collected surface samples to test for mold, coliform, and metals from areas that were directly impacted by fire and water damage (10 units), as well as surface wipe samples to test for soot and asbestos for areas that were only impacted by smoke damage (10 units). • Hayes House Pre-Renovation Materials Study, Franklin, TN: Project professional. Performed asbestos, lead-based paint, and mold sampling for historic home built in the 1800s in preparation for renovation. Mold sampling included visual observations, relative humidity readings, moisture meter readings, and air samples to determine the extent of damage to the structure after an apparent roof leak. Commercial • Various Phase I ESAs including: • Southern Turf Property, Nashville, TN • Round Rock, TX • Quik Mart property in Sheffield, AL • Multi-Family Development in Cedar Park, TX • Acquisition for Fresh Capital, LLC, Jefferson County, KY: Project professional. Performed a Phase I ESA that recommended further environmental assessment due to the site’s historic use as a dry-cleaner and gas station. A Phase II investigation revealed several USTs at the site as well as extensive hydrocarbon contamination of underlying soils and groundwater. • Acquisition for CESO, Inc., Maury County, TN: Project professional. TTL performed a Phase I ESA, wetland delineation, and geotechnical exploration for a site in Maury County, TN. The wetland delineation identified a previously undocumented spring and two areas of drainage on the property. • Goodall The Groves Reserve, Wilson County, TN: Project professional. Performed field work, created figures, and wrote the report for a Phase I ESA for a 36-acre site. This was an update to a Phase I performed in 2017. • Goodall The Grove at Five Oaks, Lebanon, TN: Project professional. Performed field work, created figures, and wrote the report for a Phase I ESA for a 30-acre site at Five Oaks Boulevard and Ridgecrest Lane. This was an update to a Phase I performed in 2016. 261 ZACH BLAIR, PG, TN QHP, PAGE 3 • West Main Street, Lebanon, TN: Project professional. Performed field work and created figures for a Limited Phase II ESA. The project consisted of two commercial sites of approximately 1.04 acres. • Phase III ESA, West Main Street, Lebanon, TN: Project professional. Performed field work and created figures for a Limited Phase II ESA. The project consisted of two commercial sites of approximately 1.04 acres. • Mallard Fox Creek, Decatur, AL: Project professional. Performed field work, created figures, and wrote the report for this 268-acre property. TTL environmental services included stream and wetland delineations, as well as an endangered species study. Government • Naval Air Station Corpus Christi, Mold Remediation Building 100, Corpus Christi, TX: Project professional. Zach performed a Limited Mold Assessment for Building 100. The assessment included a visual inspection focused on the discovery of signs of mold growth and moisture intrusion. A moisture meter was used to help locate areas of actively wet building materials and to test suspect areas. Microbial samples were collected at the request of the client and they were submitted to a qualified microbiology lab for analysis. A written report of the limited mold inspection findings and a lab report of the sample were also completed. Industrial • Twin Pines Minerals Permitting Services, Saint George, GA: Project professional. Performed field work for a proposed mine in Southern Georgia. TTL delineated streams and wetlands and performed a habitat assessment for an endangered species of tortoise and snake. • Confidential Quarry Locations, Tennessee and Alabama: Project professional. Provided analytical review and regulatory compliance review. TTL performed Phase I and Phase II ESAs for seven different properties owned by a quarry company ranging in size from approximately 1 acre to 450 acres. Over the course of the Phase II investigations, TTL oversaw the removal of a 250-gallon subsurficial OWS, subsurface investigation adjacent to aboveground storage tanks, and the storage/removal of impacted materials. • EPSC Site Inspections, Sumner County and Maury County, TN: Project professional. Performed weekly site visits on sites in Sumner County and Maury County with EPSC Level 1 Certification to determine whether erosion and sediment control systems are operating at standards set by the site specific SWPP. Institutional • Putnam County Justice Center Additions, Putnam County, TN: Environmental scope of work included an initial asbestos inspection of four residences prior to demolition. TTL personnel performed a site inspection, identified suspect asbestos containing material (ACM) within the residences, and collected suspect ACM for laboratory analysis. Once ACMs were identified, TTL presented results to the client who completed a bid process for abatement of ACM within four residences. TTL then completed post-abatement oversight of the four residences. ACM was abated from the four residences within a tight schedule to avoid delays in the construction schedule of the client. Obstacles overcome included sampling of residences built in the early to mid-1900s which had undergone several renovations, as well as communicating to the third-party abatement company through the client. Transportation • Metropolitan Nashville Airport Authority Noise Study, Nashville International Airport, Nashville, TN: Installation and daily monitoring of sound level meters across the grounds of Nashville International Airport to record and analyze noise levels associated with construction. • Tennessee Department of Transportation (TDOT) Environmental Services Hazardous Materials Contract E2071, Statewide Tennessee: Project professional. Performed field work, created figures, and wrote reports. Services include asbestos bridge surveys, Phase II Environmental Site Assessments (ESA), Asbestos Containing Materials 262 ZACH BLAIR, PG, TN QHP, PAGE 4 (ACM) and Hazardous Building Materials (HBM) surveys, and Other Environmental Concerns (OEC) abatement. To date, TTL has completed 100 work orders. • TDOT SR-4 Right-of-Way Project, Shelby County, TN: Project professional for Phase II ESA of four parcels at large right-of-way intersection widening project. The parcels included gasoline stations and automotive maintenance shops, some with release histories. Assisted in regulatory file reviews and preparation of a work plan to address TDOT criteria and conducted field activities and assisted in final report preparation. The project consisted of a 1.9-mile roadway widening and interchange construction that encroached on several properties with high environmental risk. Location of project is SR-4 (Lamar Avenue) from South of Shelby Drive to near the Raines/ Perkins Road Interchange. This project was part of TTL’s TDOT E2071 Contract. Completed in 2019. Cost $43,466. • TDOT I-75 Asbestos Bridge Surveys, Loudon County, TN: Field Inspector for completion of asbestos bridge surveys of 10 I-75 bridges that crossed various streams and roadways. Enlisted the aid of TDOT Region 1 to use a snooper truck to sample two bridges crossing the Tennessee River. Coordinated field activities and prepared final reports. Project completed ahead of schedule. Completed in 2020. Cost $29,264. • TDOT Emergency SR-46 Asbestos Bridge Survey, Dickson County, TN: Project inspector for an emergency bridge ACM survey. TTL was contacted in August 2020 regarding the need to complete an emergency ACM survey of a bridge damaged by flooding, resulting in a highway shutdown. The field activities were completed the following day and a final report was submitted ahead of schedule. Cost $3,816. • TDOT I-40 Asbestos Bridge Surveys, Grundy County, TN: Project inspector for the ACM inspections of four I-40 bridges. Coordinated and participated in field surveys and prepared final inspection reports. Completed in 2020. Cost $10,203. • TDOT SR-73 Asbestos Bridge Surveys, Sevier County, TN: Project inspector for the ACM inspections of four bridges in Sevier County. Coordinated and participated in field surveys and prepared final inspection reports. Completed in 2019. Cost $10,848.70. • Proposed Colorado Boulevard 7-11, Denver, CO: Project professional. Performed field work, created figures, and wrote the report for a Phase II ESA. Field work included installation of a groundwater monitoring, water sample collection, and collection of samples from soil borings drilled on the property to analyze for possible subsurface impacts. • TDOT Asbestos Sampling, Two Bridges, SR-29 from North of SR-60 to Landes Way, Rhea County, TN: Project professional. Zach performed asbestos sampling of various bridge components (concrete, padding, etc.) for potential asbestos containing materials. Both bridges are two-lane, single span bridges constructed of steel I-beams and concrete deck/wearing surface and span the Rickland Creek Overflow. This project is part of TTL’s Tennessee Department of Transportation (TDOT) Hazardous Materials Contract. • TDOT Asbestos Sampling, Three Bridges, SR-153 from North of Shallowford Road to North of SR-58, Hamilton County, TN: Project professional. Zach performed asbestos sampling of various bridge components (concrete, padding, etc.) for potential asbestos containing materials. The three bridges are seven- and eight-lane, four-span bridges on State Route 153, a high traffic route that goes through part of downtown Chattanooga. This project is part of TTL’s Tennessee Department of Transportation (TDOT) Hazardous Materials Contract. • TDOT Asbestos Sampling, SR-8 Bridge over Sequatchie River, Sevier County, TN: Project professional. Zach performed asbestos sampling of various bridge components (concrete, padding, etc.) for potential asbestos containing materials. The bridge is a two-lane, 290-foot, three-span bridge in a very rural area. This project is part of TTL’s Tennessee Department of Transportation (TDOT) Hazardous Materials Contract. • TDOT Asbestos Sampling, Five Bridges in Humphreys County, TN: Project professional. Zach performed asbestos 263 ZACH BLAIR, PG, TN QHP, PAGE 5 sampling of various bridge components (concrete, padding, etc.) for potential asbestos containing materials on five bridges on Interstate 40. This project is part of TTL’s Tennessee Department of Transportation (TDOT) Hazardous Materials Contract. Mold Samplings • City of La Vergne Limited Mold Assessment, La Vergne, TN: Environmental surveyor. Performed a Limited Mold Assessment for the referenced office space. The assessment included visual inspection, relative humidity readings, moisture meter readings, and the collection of air quality samples requested by client. These were submitted to a qualified microbiology lab for analysis resulting in a written report of the limited mold inspection findings and a lab report of the sample. • The Villages of Farragut Assisted Living Facility Mold Assessment and Remediation, Farragut, TN: Environmental surveyor. Performed a Limited Mold Assessment of a multi-story building that was under construction that included visual observations, moisture meter readings, indoor air quality samples, and swab samples of surfaces that were potentially contaminated. Laboratory analysis indicated mold growth throughout the structure, and Zach worked with a remediation specialist to inspect completed remediation efforts throughout the structure. • Rock Harbor Condominiums Sampling, Nashville, TN: Environmental surveyor. Performed an emergency response sampling for two condominium buildings (20 total units) that had undergone fire damage. Sampling included collected surface samples to test for mold, coliform, and metals from areas that were directly impacted by fire and water damage (10 units), as well as surface wipe samples to test for soot and asbestos for areas that were only impacted by smoke damage (10 units). • Hayes House Pre-Renovation Materials Study, Franklin. TN: Environmental surveyor. Performed asbestos, lead-based paint, and mold sampling for historic home built in the 1800s in preparation for renovation. Mold sampling included visual observations, relative humidity readings, moisture meter readings, and air samples to determine the extent of damage to the structure after an apparent roof leak. PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS (cont’d from page 1) American Institute of Professional Geologists 264 David Carden, PG Senior Project Manager Environmental Services Drawn to geology through his attraction to nature, David understands the responsibility that comes with this line of work. Sometimes, the materials he deals with can be harmful, so doing it right the first time – and every time – saves money, reduces errors, and protects workers, the public, and relationships with clients. David has built a reputation of providing world class environmental compliance, due diligence, and environmental risk analysis for industrial and commercial clients for projects across the country. He also is a recognized subject matter expert in environmental compliance, especially to the concrete products industry.EXPERIENCE 28 years EDUCATION BS, Geology Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University REGISTRATIONS & CERTIFICATIONS Licensed Professional Geologist, Tennessee #4673 OSHA 10 Hour Smith System Driver Safety Seminar PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS City of Brentwood, TN Chair of Environmental Advisory Board Tennessee Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Tennessee Manufacturing Association KEY PROJECTS • McEwen High School NEPA, Humphreys County Schools, 2021: Managed and conducted a NEPA assessment for the USDA Rural Development funding for a new high school in McEwen TN. The NEPA involved assessment of the 80-year old structure and surrounding community. • TDOT Jostens Road, Clarksville, TN: Project manager. TTL conducted a TDOT TEER for a new 1,500-foot roadway. The project included completing the TDOT TEER process. Hazardous materials, threatened and endangered species, wetland resources, cultural and archeological resources, and other NEPA elements were evaluated for an approximate 1,550 LF industrial access roadway on an approximate 3-acre site. Project fee: $341,500 • MAPCO Express Southeastern US: Project manager. TTL conducted Phase I ESAs for 319 convenience store gas stations in Tennessee, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Arkansas, and Kentucky. Phase I ESAs were completed to ASTM E-1527 standards and all were completed within 100 days. Project fee: $765,600. Professional services: 2023 • SR 12 at Excel Road Alternatives Study, Clarksville, TN: Managed and conducted a NEPA assessment as part of a study to examine the current safety and traffic operations of the intersection and approaches. • Decatur Bridge, Decatur, AL: TTL is performing a feasibility study to determine replacement/repair options for US Hwy 31 over the Tennessee River. Preliminary NEPA assessment of potential routes are being evaluated to determine the best route with the least disturbance to the environment and community. • SR-237 (Rossview Road) Phase I from Cardinal Lane to West of I-24, Clarksville, TN: Environmental project manager. Project consisted of widening of 0.91 miles of SR- 237 for the City of Clarksville in response to increased and planned regional traffic volumes adjacent to an I-24 exit. The project included the design of new sidewalks with a 3-foot grass strip and widening of an existing 2-lane roadway to a 3-lane roadway. TTL’s environmental services included performing a NEPA assessment. Project also included consultant-managed ROW acquisition. Project cost: $13.3 million. Professional services: 2023 | Construction: 2023 • TDOT Hazardous Materials On-Call Contract Nashville, TN: Project manager. TTL has held this contract since 2018, providing environmental consultation service for projects including intersection improvements, roadway widening, and bridge repairs. Much of the work performed is related to asbestos-containing materials (ACM) and hazardous building materials (HBM) surveys. When ACM or HBM is identified, 265 DAVID CARDEN, PG, PAGE 2 abatement oversight is provided. TTL has completed 169 projects to date on this contract and the current contract value (renewed in 2021) is $1.5 million. • TDOT Electric Avenue, Clarksville, TN: Project manager. TTL conducted a TDOT Tennessee Environmental Evaluation Report (TEER), which is the state transportation NEPA equivalent, to support construction of a new state industrial access road for LG Chem. Hazardous materials, threatened and endangered species, wetland resources, cultural and archeological resources, and other NEPA elements were evaluated. Project fee: $277,000 • 19th Church Street, Midtown Residential, Nashville, TN 2021: Provided senior oversight and management for the environmental tasks associated with this new residential development including Phase I ESA, Phase II ESA, and asbestos surveys. • Hayes House, City of Franklin, Franklin, TN 2022: Managed and conducted environmental assessments for a historical residential structure to be transitioned to civic education and event space. Tasks included asbestos, mold, and lead-based paint surveys. • New City Multi-Use Redevelopment, Neuhoff, Nashville, TN, 2021-present: New City Properties acquired the 14- acre Neuhoff site in Nashville, TN. The distinctive Neuhoff site is located on the west bank of the Cumberland River in the eastern section of Nashville’s Germantown neighborhood. David managed and conducted environmental assessments for a Brownfields redevelopment of a historic food processing facility into a multi-use residential and commercial development. Tasks include assessment of soils, soil vapors, and asbestos. • Lease Environmental Review (LER) Program, CSX Transportation (CSXT), 22 States: Assist and provide senior technical advisory role for the CSXT LER Program. Responsibilities include quality review of approximately 120 LERs per year at CSXT leased properties throughout the eastern U.S. LERs include performance of modified Phase I ESAs on leases with suspect lease codes, preparation of letters to lessees setting forth the required corrective actions based on environmental regulations and CSXT guidelines, and LER tracking to ensure that the corrective actions are being completed. Environmental issues have included USTs and ASTs regulatory compliance (SPCCPs), surface water and groundwater protection (NPDES permitting/SWPPP), storage/labeling of hazardous and non- hazardous chemicals (BMPs), solid waste and hazardous waste management, air emissions, and asbestos. • ISO 14001 Audits, Confidential Client, 2019, Eastern US and Canada: Managed and conducted a multi-facility ISO 14001 third party audit for an automotive parts manufacturer. Directed multiple senior professionals to complete the ISO 14001 audits and summarize findings for the client. • On-site Temporary Embedded Environmental Manager, Electrolux, 2017, Springfield, TN: Provided temporary in-house environmental management for the Electrolux manufacturing facility in Springfield, TN. Maintained compliance with air and wastewater permit requirements, recommended waste reduction strategies that would reduce hazardous waste disposal by 70% when implemented, and updated environmental reports over a three month period. • Multiple Short Line Railroad Due Diligence Environmental Risk Analysis, Confidential Client, 2018-2019: Managed and conducted the environmental risk analysis for a short line railroad acquisition for an investment firm. Determined potential high risk properties and activities related to the target company to allow the client to quantify potential acquired environmental risks. • Voluntary Remediation Program Assessment, Confidential Client, Charleston, West Virginia, 2017-present, USA: Managed the assessment of soil and groundwater through the WVDEP Voluntary Remediation Program. Conducted well installation and groundwater sampling to assess varying alluvial groundwater flow zones to assist in the preparation of a conceptual site model for closure of volatile organics in groundwater. Additional assessment and remediation of polychlorinated biphenyls in soil was also conducted. Certificate of completion expected 2Q 2021. • Risk-Based Closure of Solvent Spill, Steelcase, Inc.; Athens, Alabama, 2017, USA: Assisted with risk-based closure of a legacy chlorinated solvent spill with residual chlorinated compounds present in groundwater. Alabama Risk- 266 DAVID CARDEN, PG, PAGE 3 Based Corrective Action with environmental covenants closure granted in 2017. • 42-site Phase I ESA and EHS Compliance Audit Portfolio, Confidential Client, 2015, USA: Portfolio and project manager for a glass products manufacturer which included Phase I ESA and EHS compliance portfolio throughout the USA. Project scope included Phase I ESA and EHS compliance audits for manufacturing facilities and transaction reviews for warehouse facilities. The EHS compliance audits included stormwater, process water, and air permitting, regulatory reporting, such as EPCRA, Tier 2 and Form R reports, boiler and storage tank inspection reports and permits, environmental plans, such as SPCC and SWPPP, and waste disposal, including hazardous, non-hazardous, universal, and special waste. Based on our Phase I ESAs and EHS compliance audits, the client was successful in obtaining a representations and warranties insurance policy. • Stormwater Compliance, Confidential Client, 2015, Texas: Client had a manufacturing facility that repeatedly exceeded zinc standards in stormwater runoff. A compliance audit, including processes, maintenance hygiene, and waste treatment indicated some Best Management Practice changes to procedures that reduced the zinc levels in the stormwater without requiring an expensive and labor intensive treatment system. • SWPPP/SPCC/permitting, Confidential Client, 2014, Central USA: Project manager for SWPPP, SPCC plans, and air and stormwater permitting for multiple manufacturing sites for a retail products manufacturer in the central USA. Our client acquired facilities which had regulatory deficiencies. We were able to quickly bring the facilities into compliance with the appropriate regulations dealing with several different states and various regulatory agencies. • 8-site Phase I ESA and EHS Compliance Audit Portfolio, Confidential Client, 2014, Midwestern USA: Portfolio and project manager for a concrete products manufacturing company portfolio. Project scope included Phase I ESA and EHS compliance audits for manufacturing facilities. The EHS compliance audits included stormwater, process water, and air permitting, regulatory reporting, such as EPCRA, Tier 2 and Form R reports, boiler and storage tank inspection reports, environmental plans, such as SPCC and SWPPP, and waste disposal. The Phase I ESAs discovered an illegal process water discharge to the ground, an historical landfill on a property, and a leaking AST and maintenance operation discharging via underground pipe to a stormwater retention pond. These discoveries saved the client approximately $250,000 in liability by ensuring the seller retained liability for the issues. • Truck overturn emergency spill response, Confidential Client, 2014, Tennessee: Participated as a subcontractor to monitor and perform confirmatory soil sampling of an emergency response where an overturned truck spilled diesel fuel near a protected stream. The project scope was to monitor for the presence of diesel fuel in the stream and to perform confirmatory sampling of the excavated soil between the spill area and the stream. The emergency response contractor was successful in preventing the diesel fuel from reaching the stream and confirmatory sampling verified that no residual impacts remained. • 8-site Phase I ESA Portfolio, Confidential Client, 2013, California: Portfolio and project manager for a concrete products manufacturer. Discovered asbestos tiles being rendered friable by forklift activity, historical foundry activity that adversely impacted soil, and environmental compliance deficiencies. These discoveries saved the client approximately $500,000 in liability by ensuring the seller retained liability for the issues. • Emergency Spill Response Remediation, Confidential Client, 2006, Tennessee: Project manager for an emergency response remediation action due to a diesel tanker truck overturning less than 100 yards from a water bottling spring source area. After the initial response, we installed a series of shallow groundwater wells and performed continuous pumping of the wells to act as a hydrologic barrier between the spill site and the spring source area. Confirmatory sampling was conducted to monitor for the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons in the groundwater monitoring wells. The result of the project was the successful protection of the spring water source area for the water bottling company. The value to the client was the continued viability of the spring as a bottling source and millions in saved revenue. 267 DAVID CARDEN, PG, PAGE 4 • Groundwater monitoring and well closure, Confidential Client, 2006, Tennessee: Project manager for an airline fuel depot notice of violation regarding exceedance of groundwater standards in the spill detection wells surrounding the fuel depot. The project was instigated by a regulator observing the presence of jet fuel in what was described as an observation well. The project involved monitoring the detection wells around the fuel depot and investigating the claim of the regulator regarding a spill at the site. It was determined that the regulator observed jet fuel in pump recycling sump and no spill was occurring at the site. The client was satisfied with the outcome of the project. • Spill Training, Confidential Client, 2005, USA: Provided training for plant personnel regarding spill response and prevention at various sites throughout the USA. The curriculum was developed to present the information in a practical manner that was easily learned. The client credited the training with improved performance in petroleum hygiene in the plants trained. • College Grove Lead Battery Site, US EPA, 2001-2003, Tennessee: Participated as a team member for removal action and confirmatory sampling of lead battery hulls throughout the southern Williamson County area of Tennessee. Project responsibilities included confirming removal of lead-contaminated soil by use of a Niton XRF on the remaining soil surface after excavation was complete. • Environmental, Health, and Safety Audits, Nemak, 2018, Eastern US and Ontario: Managed and performed EHS audits for Tier I automotive supplier as a third party audit focusing on worker safety, process safety, and environmental compliance and reporting. • Safety and Environmental Compliance Training, Confidential Client, Spring Hill, Tennessee 2018-2020: Conducted production worker safety and environmental compliance awareness training for ISO 14001 Audits, Confidential Client, 2019, Eastern US and Canada. Managed and conducted a multi-facility ISO 14001 third party audit for an automotive parts manufacturer. Directed multiple senior professionals to complete the ISO 14001 audits and summarize findings for the client. • TDOT ACM Pre-demolition Asbestos Inspection, Shelby County, TN: Provided project management and senior oversight to the TTL personnel conducting ACM inspections and abatement for a commercial structure in Memphis. TTL accredited inspectors sampled the commercial building for ACM. The building had detections of ACM that required abatement prior to demolishing the building. In addition, hazardous building materials were assessed and removed. TTL subcontracted the abatement work while providing oversight and subcontractor management for the abatement. TTL documented the abatement, providing reports to TDOT for the completed work. • TDOT ACM Pre-demolition Asbestos Inspections, Cumberland County, TN: Provided project management and senior oversight to the TTL team conducting asbestos-containing materials (ACM) inspections and abatement for six residences located in a proposed right-of-way. TTL accredited inspectors sampled the buildings for ACM. Several of the residences had detections of ACM that required abatement prior to demolishing the buildings. In addition, hazardous building materials were assessed and removed, and drinking water wells were properly abandoned during the abatement phase of the project. TTL documented the abatement, providing reports to TDOT for the completed work. • TDOT ACM Bridge Inspections, Clay County, TN: Provided project management and senior oversight to the TTL team conducting ACM inspections of two bridges. Our team obtained samples which were analyzed by an accredited lab. TTL completed an asbestos report detailing the findings of the inspection. • TDOT ACM Bridge Inspection, Putnam County, TN: Provided project management and senior oversight to the TTL team conducting ACM inspections of a roadway bridge in Putnam County. Our team obtained samples which were analyzed by an accredited lab. TTL completed an asbestos report detailing the findings of the inspection. • TDOT ACM Pre-demolition Asbestos Inspections, Carroll County, TN: Provided project management and senior oversight to the TTL team conducting asbestos-containing materials (ACM) inspections and abatement for nine 268 DAVID CARDEN, PG, PAGE 5 residences located in a proposed right-of-way. TTL accredited inspectors sampled the buildings for ACM. Several of the residences had detections of ACM that required abatement prior to demolishing the buildings. In addition, hazardous building materials were assessed and removed, and drinking water wells were properly abandoned during the abatement phase of the project. TTL subcontracted the abatement work while providing oversight and subcontractor management for the abatement. TTL documented the abatement, providing reports to TDOT for the completed work. Sampling of Mold • Metro Nashville Government, 2017, Nashville, TN: Performed and managed mold, asbestos, and lead-based paint sampling of housing units subject to Federal HUD guidelines. After sampling, remedial oversight was conducted to remove potential hazards. • Confidential Industrial Facility, 2019, Dickson, TN: Performed and managed a forensic assessment of industrial hygiene sampling including the potential presence of mold, legionella, and other biological agents that were causing illness in workers at the facility. Sampling and observation of industrial processes concentrated on solving the source of the worker illness. The cause was determined to be a bacterial agent in fluids used in industrial processes at the facility. • Rock Harbor Condominiums Sampling, 2022, Nashville, TN: Managed an emergency response sampling for two condominium buildings (20 total units) that had undergone fire damage. Sampling included collected surface samples to test for mold, coliform, and metals from areas that were directly impacted by fire and water damage (10 units), as well as surface wipe samples to test for soot and asbestos for areas that were only impacted by smoke damage (10 units). • Hayes House Pre-Renovation Materials Survey, The Park at Harlinsdale Farm, 2022, Franklin, TN: Managed asbestos, lead-based paint, and mold sampling for an historic home built in the 1800s in preparation for careful renovation of the structure. Mold sampling included visual observations, relative humidity readings, moisture meter readings, and air samples to determine the extend of damage to the structure after an apparent roof leak. 269 Geotechnical Report 7Brew Winter Springs, Florida Prepared for Prepared by: TTL, Inc. Nashville, Tennessee Project No. 000240803190.00 December 19, 2024 270 271 CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. – 7Brew (Winter Springs, FL) December 19, 2024 TTL Project No. 000240803190.00 Page i CONTENTS 1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Scope of Services .................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 EXPLORATION FINDINGS ...................................................................................................................... 1 2.1 Site Conditions ........................................................................................................................ 1 2.2 Geologic Information ............................................................................................................... 3 2.2.1 Geologic and Soil Information ............................................................................................. 3 2.2.3 Karst Considerations ........................................................................................................... 3 2.3 Subsurface Stratigraphy ......................................................................................................... 4 2.4 Groundwater Conditions ......................................................................................................... 5 3.0 GEOTECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS...................................................................................................... 5 4.0 EARTHWORK RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................................... 6 4.1 Site Preparation ...................................................................................................................... 6 4.2 Subgrade Preparation ............................................................................................................. 6 4.3 Proofrolling .............................................................................................................................. 7 4.4 Subgrade Stabilization ............................................................................................................ 7 4.5 Excavation Conditions ............................................................................................................. 8 4.6 Compacted Fill ........................................................................................................................ 9 4.7 Drainage Considerations.......................................................................................................10 4.8 Groundwater Control .............................................................................................................10 5.0 INFRASTRUCTURE RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................................................... 11 5.1 Pavement Recommendations ...............................................................................................11 5.1.1 Flexible Pavement Sections ................................................................................................. 11 5.1.2 Rigid Pavement Sections ...................................................................................................... 13 5.1.3 General Pavement Considerations ...................................................................................... 15 6.0 STRUCTURAL RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................................. 16 6.1 Seismic Site Classification ....................................................................................................16 272 CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. – 7Brew (Winter Springs, FL) December 19, 2024 TTL Project No. 000240803190.00 Page ii 6.2 Shallow Foundations .............................................................................................................16 6.3 Floor Slab ..............................................................................................................................17 7.0 LIMITATIONS ....................................................................................................................................... 18 APPENDIX A (ILLUSTRATIONS) Site Location Map Exploration Location Plan Legend Sheet – Soil Exploration Logs Laboratory Results Summary ASTM D1140 – Standard Test Method for Materials in Soils Finer than No. 200 Sieve APPENDIX B (REFERENCE MATERIALS) Exploration Procedures Laboratory Procedures 273 CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. – 7Brew (Winter Springs, Florida) December 19, 2024 TTL Project No. 000240803190.00 Page 1 1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION 1.1 Project Information Project information was provided by Ms. Erin Dudley (CEI) in an email transmission on November 8, 2024. We were provided a drawing titled “Conceptual Site Plan,” prepared by Seven Brew, dated September 26, 2024. This drawing shows information about the location of the property under consideration for this project and the location of planned improvements on the property. Plans are being made to construct a new 7Brew on an approximately 0.5-acre land parcel located on the north side of East Florida 434, east of its intersection with Michael Blake Boulevard at the intersection of two proposed street extensions in Winter Springs, Florida. The construction will include a 510 square feet single-story retail building in the central part of the property. An approximately 250 square foot (one-story) remote freezer is planned northwest of the building. We have assumed the buildings will be constructed with concrete masonry units (CMU) and light gauge steel joists, with brick exterior veneer. The floors will be concrete slab-on-grade. Structural loading information was not provided. We have assumed maximum column loads will be less than 50 kips, maximum continuous wall loads will be less than 2 kips per linear foot, and the maximum floor slab live load is less than 100 pounds per square foot (psf). Information about existing and final site elevations was not provided to us. We assume mass grading will require maximum cut depths and fill thicknesses less than 1 to 2 feet each. 1.2 Scope of Services This geotechnical exploration included a site reconnaissance, field exploration, laboratory testing, and engineering analysis. The following sections of this report discuss the results of the field exploration, site geology, site conditions, and our conclusions and recommendations. Environmental assessment of the property was beyond the scope of this geotechnical exploration. However, our services included performing a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) for the property. The results of these services will be reported under separate cover. 2.0 EXPLORATION FINDINGS 2.1 Site Conditions Item Description Property Location The property is located on the north side of Florida State Route 434, about 300 feet west of its intersection with Michael Blake Boulevard at the intersection of proposed extensions of Laughing Gull Lane and Sea Hawk Cover. 274 CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. – 7Brew (Winter Springs, Florida) December 19, 2024 TTL Project No. 000240803190.00 Page 2 Item Description Surface Cover Surface cover consists of grass and weeds in the south and west parts of the property. Surface cover in the north and east parts of the property consists of relatively dense weeds, underbrush, and small- to medium-diameter trees. Existing Topography The ground surface slopes downward towards the southeast. Relief across the property was estimated to be between 3 and 5 feet. Photographs depicting general conditions of the study area at the time of our field activities are shown below. View looking northwest from southeast property area View looking east from central site area View looking north from central part of property View looking southeast from northwest property corner 275 CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. – 7Brew (Winter Springs, Florida) December 19, 2024 TTL Project No. 000240803190.00 Page 3 2.2 Geologic Information This report section includes a description about the geologic unit that underlies the site and information obtained from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) about the near surface soils. Also included is information about seismicity for the site and surrounding area. 2.2.1 Geologic and Soil Information Review of the Geologic Map of Seminole County (Florida Geological Survey, dated 1993) shows the site is underlain by Quaternary undifferentiated surficial sands, clayey sands, clay, marls, and peat. These materials are typically greater than 20 feet thick. According to information reviewed on the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) web soil survey (http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov), the site is underlain by soil associated with the Pomello fine sand. Pertinent information obtained from the Soil Survey is provided in the table below: Parent Material Sandy marine deposits Depth to water table About 24 to 42 inches General Soil Types 0 to 80 inches: fine sand The above information was taken directly from the Soil Survey and is included herein as general information only. Performing laboratory testing to confirm these properties was not included in our authorized scope of services. 2.2.3 Karst Considerations We reviewed the “Sinkholes of Seminole County, Florida (2008)” prepared by the Florida Center for Instructional Technology (FCIT) using data from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and the Florida Geological Survey for the purpose of checking the presence of karst at the property. Our review did not show the presence of mapped karst features on the property but did reveal the presence of several mapped sinkholes in the general area (reference map excerpt below). The requested scope of services for this project did not include advancing borings to a sufficient depth to evaluate karst potential. We can provide this service for an additional fee, if requested. 276 CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. – 7Brew (Winter Springs, Florida) December 19, 2024 TTL Project No. 000240803190.00 Page 4 2.3 Subsurface Stratigraphy Subsurface conditions within the project limits were explored by drilling four soil test borings at the approximate locations shown on the Exploration Location Plan (ELP) in Appendix A. The exploration methods and laboratory testing referenced below are described in Appendix B. Soil descriptions follow the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS), which is described in ASTM D2487 and D2488. Additional information about the subsurface stratigraphy encountered at the boring locations is provided on logs in Appendix A. The logs represent our interpretation of the subsurface conditions at the boring locations based on tests and observations performed during the drilling operations, visual classification of the soil samples by a geoprofessional, and laboratory tests conducted on select recovered samples. The lines designating the interfaces between various strata on the logs represent the approximate strata boundary. The transition between strata may be gradual and conditions may vary between the boring locations. The borings initially penetrated a layer of topsoil. The topsoil was underlain by marine sediments to termination. A summary of the conditions encountered in the borings is presented in the table below. Scale: None Approximate Site Location N 277 CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. – 7Brew (Winter Springs, Florida) December 19, 2024 TTL Project No. 000240803190.00 Page 5 STRATIGRAPHY AND DESCRIPTIONS Stratum Depth to Bottom Material Description Engineering Properties1 Surface Materials 2 to 3 inches Topsoil N/A Marine Sediments (Layer 1) Depths ranging between 6 and 8 feet below existing grades POORLY-GRADED SAND (SP), very loose to medium dense, fine-grained, various colors, moist to wet N-values between 4 and 24 bpf, with most value between 5 bpf and 9 bpf MC = 7% to 30% % Passing = 1 to 3% Marine Sediments (Layer 2) Below Layer 1 to termination (10 feet in Boring B-04 or 13 feet in Borings B-01 through B-03 SILTY SAND (SM), loose to medium dense, various colors, wet N-values between 8 and 25 bpf, with most results between 8 bpf and 13 bpf MC = 10% to 25% Termination The borings were terminated at depths ranging between 10 and 15 feet below existing grades. 1 N-values are Standard Penetration Test (SPT) resistance values | N/A = Not Applicable bpf = blows per foot | MC = Moisture Content | % Passing = Percent passing No. 200 sieve Note: the requested work scope included performing laboratory Atterberg limits testing on select samples. This testing was not performed because cohesive soils were not encountered in the borings. 2.4 Groundwater Conditions Groundwater was measured in the borings at depths ranging between 1-½ and 3 feet below existing grades upon completion. In most cases, groundwater was measured at depth of 3 feet in the borings. However, groundwater was measured in Boring B-01 at a depth of about 1-½ feet, but this boring was advanced using rotary wash methods. Therefore, in our opinion the measured water level in this boring was influenced by water introduced into the borehole during the wash drilling methods. The groundwater surface can fluctuate throughout the year due to seasonal changes in climate, precipitation, vegetation, surface runoff, water levels in nearby water bodies, and other factors. The groundwater level below the site may fluctuate and may be at different levels at times after the exploration. 3.0 GEOTECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS The borings generally show the property is underlain by loose sands and groundwater is generally present at a depth of about 3 feet below existing grades. Therefore, the possibility exists for weak subgrades to be present after the site is prepared. In general, we anticipate most weak subgrades can be stabilized during site preparation by densifying the soils using a large vibratory roller. However, at isolated locations, some undercutting and replacement of weak soils may be required. Comments about stabilizing weak subgrades are provided in Section 4.4. 278 CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. – 7Brew (Winter Springs, Florida) December 19, 2024 TTL Project No. 000240803190.00 Page 6 We anticipate grading at the property will generally be performed as part of mass grading for the development planned at the property. The possibility exists mass grading will not be performed using the recommendations consistent with the recommendations contained in this report. Therefore, prior to initiating construction at the property, we recommend additional exploration consisting of test pits be excavated to check whether or not the past grading activities appear to be consistent with the recommendations contained in this report. Also, we recommend construction phase testing records documenting site observations and tests made during the grading be provided to us for review, to check compliance with the project specifications. 4.0 EARTHWORK RECOMMENDATIONS The recommendations contained in this report were developed based on our understanding of the project (Section 1.1). If the project information described in this report is not accurate or is revised, we should be provided the additional or revised information and authorized for additional services to review and modify our recommendations, if needed. 4.1 Site Preparation Site preparation should initially consist of removing trees and surface vegetation. These materials should be disposed of at an off-site location. Afterwards, stripping should be performed to remove organic-laden topsoil from planned construction areas. Organic-laden strippings should be removed from the site or stockpiled for re-use as topsoil during landscaping, if they are suitable for that purpose. Site clearing operations should include removing roots that are larger than ½-inch diameter and smaller highly concentrated roots. Considering the relatively heavily vegetated nature of parts of the property, a minimum excavation depth of 12 inches may be required to remove roots. Root raking may also be required. 4.2 Subgrade Preparation After the site is prepared, cuts should be made to final grades. Afterwards, prior to building or pavement construction or placing new compacted fill, exposed subgrades should be scarified (8 inches), moisture conditioned and densified using a large vibratory drum roller with a drum diameter of at least 5 feet with a rated dynamic force of 60,000 pounds. The densification process may identify unstable areas as the compactor traverses over the areas. Initially, the contractor should check that the instability is not the result of excess pore water pressure caused by the densification (see paragraph below). If excess pore water pressures have been allowed to dissipate and additional compaction does not result in a stable subgrade, remedial repair, consisting of undercutting and replacing weak materials, will be required. Our geotechnical engineer should be consulted if weak subgrade conditions are encountered. 279 CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. – 7Brew (Winter Springs, Florida) December 19, 2024 TTL Project No. 000240803190.00 Page 7 Dependent on the depth to groundwater, the vibratory compaction may induce a pumping working surface. This apparent surface instability is only temporary. If this condition occurs, the in -place densification should be stopped to allow dissipation of excess pore water pressure induced by the compaction process. Experience indicates delay times of less than 15 minutes are typical. Once pore pressures have dissipated, recompaction may proceed. Given the fines content of the expected subgrade soils, pumping of the subgrade could occur if groundwater is within 2 feet to 3 feet of the subgrade. If this occurs, we should be contacted to provide guidance for possible methods to achieve the recommended densification. This will likely involve disengaging the vibrator on the compactor during subsequent compaction operations. The process should be continued until the subgrade is densified and stable and the surface of the subgrade meets the compaction criteria in Section 4.6. 4.3 Proofrolling After cuts are made to final grade and subgrades densified, the stability of exposed subgrades should be evaluated by proofrolling. Proofrolling should be performed in accordance with the following. • Perform proofrolling with a rubber-tired vehicle having a gross vehicle weight of at least 20 tons (such as a loaded, tandem-axle dump truck). • Proofrolling equipment should make multiple closely-spaced overlapping passes in perpendicular directions over the subgrade at a walking pace. • The subgrade should be relatively smooth and free of wheel ruts, loose clods of soil, or loose gravel, and the subgrade should not be desiccated, cracked, or wet at the time of proofrolling. • A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe the proofrolling to identify, document, and mark areas of unstable subgrade response, such as pumping, rutting, or shoving, if any. Please be aware the near surface soils consists of sands with little fines. Therefore, unless these materials are laterally confined, some rutting of the subgrade may occur during the proofrolling. Rutting may not be indicative of weak subgrades and our geoprofessional should provide comments about whether subgrade remedial repair is required where rutting is present. Since the boring data shows the presence of weak near surface materials, we anticipate some subgrade remedial repair will be required even after the near surface soils are densified. The potential for unstable subgrades increases if grading occurs during wet weather due to increased soil moisture content from surface water infiltration. 4.4 Subgrade Stabilization Weak subgrades identified during proofrolling below the building area should be undercut to stable materials. Weak materials identified in pavement areas should be stabilized using a method 280 CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. – 7Brew (Winter Springs, Florida) December 19, 2024 TTL Project No. 000240803190.00 Page 8 provided later in this report section. If undercutting in pavement areas is selected, it should be continued to stable materials or a depth requiring at least 3 feet of new fill placement. Please be aware the undercut depth may not approach 3 feet (e.g., if 2 feet of fill is required, the undercut depth should be 1 foot). After undercutting, as described above, weak materials in pavement areas can be stabilized using the following methods: • Bridging with a “stabilization lift”: o Undercutting the site to allow placing 3 feet of new fill. If grading requires placing new fill, the undercut depth can be reduced by the thickness of new fill required. o Placing a geotextile fabric (Mirafi 500X or equivalent) over the subgrade. o Placing a bridge lift (approximately 12 inches to 18 inches thick) of compacted fill over the geotextile as a single lift. This lift should be compacted, but over-compaction that may cause the subgrade to pump excessively should be avoided. o Placing remaining fill in accordance with the recommendations contained in this report for compacted fill (Section 4.6). o For this option, required undercut depths will depend on actual conditions. Therefore, a trial-and-error approach should be used in which the bridge lift is tried over a small test section and adjustments made until the appropriate thickness needed to create a stable condition is achieved. • Scarifying and Recompacting” o This means scarifying the subgrade to a depth of 8 inches to 12 inches to dry the soil, and then recompacting the scarified layer to recommendations given for compacted fill. o This method is usually only used when the proofrolled subgrade ruts without significant pumping. 4.5 Excavation Conditions The borings encountered sandy soils to their termination depths. We anticipate overburden soils can be excavated by conventional earthmoving equipment. Temporary construction excavations less than 20 feet deep should be sloped or shored by the contractor in accordance with OSHA requirements. The on-site soils appear to be OSHA Type C soils. OSHA requires temporary excavation slopes no steeper than 1.5-horizontal to 1-vertical (1.5H:1V) through Type C soils. The contractor’s “competent person” should evaluate temporary excavations daily and determine the specific soil types and temporary slope or shoring measures necessary according to OSHA requirements. Temporary excavations taller/deeper than 20 feet must be designed specifically by a registered engineer and cannot be made based on OSHA soil types. Design of temporary excavations was not part of our scope of services. TTL assumes no responsibility for excavations, shoring, or job site safety, which are the sole responsibility of the general contractor. 281 CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. – 7Brew (Winter Springs, Florida) December 19, 2024 TTL Project No. 000240803190.00 Page 9 4.6 Compacted Fill We anticipate on-site borrow materials will generally consist of sands generated from cuts required to achieve final grades. Our laboratory test data suggests these materials may meet the criteria for compacted fill. However, moisture conditioning may be required to achieve suitable moisture contents for recompaction. Characteristics of recommended fill soils and the placement and compaction criteria for fill are provided in the following table. Borrow materials imported onto the property should meet the criteria provided in the table. Fill operations should not begin until representative soil samples are collected from proposed borrow areas and tested for grain size and moisture/density relationship (allow 3 to 4 days for sampling and testing soil). The test results will be used to determine whether the proposed borrow material meets project specifications and to evaluate whether compacted fill has achieved compaction requirements based on field density tests. A TTL representative should be present to monitor and test the placement of compacted fill materials. COMPACTED FILL CRITERIA Material Type Characteristics Compaction Procedures 1 Compaction Control 2 COARSE-GRAINED SOILS (GRANULAR FILL) • Gravel size: not more than 3 inches • Gravel content: no more than 30 percent retained on a No. 4 sieve • Organic content: no more than 3 percent by weight, but large roots are not allowed • USCS Classification – SP, SW, SW-SM, SW-SC, SP-SM, SP-SC, SC, or GC Placement: • Maximum loose lift thickness: 8 inches. Reduced to 6 inches if hand guided compaction equipment is used. Compaction requirements: • The fill should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the modified Proctor (ASTM D 1557) maximum dry density by making multiple passes with an appropriately sized vibratory roller. Moisture Conditions: • Moisture content at time of compaction: to be determined based on the results of the standard Proctor test, but generally within minus 2 percent to plus 2 percent of the material’s optimum moisture content. Building Area: One field density test2 every 2,500 square feet per lift, with a minimum of two tests per lift. Pavement Areas: One field density test2 every 5,000 square feet per lift, with a minimum of two tests per lift. Utility Trenches: One field density test2 per structure or one test per every 100 linear feet, per lift, with a minimum of two tests per lift. 1 In addition, the fill must be stable under the influence of the compaction equipment. After the fill is properly placed and compacted, it will be advisable to limit the amount of heavy construction traffic on the soil subgrade. 2 Field density tests should be performed using the nuclear method (ASTM D6938), sand cone method (ASTM D1556), or drive-cylinder method (ASTM D2937), as appropriate for the material being tested. Proofrolling SHOULD NOT be used to evaluate compaction of fill for compliance with these requirements. 282 CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. – 7Brew (Winter Springs, Florida) December 19, 2024 TTL Project No. 000240803190.00 Page 10 Please be aware if fill materials which include over 10 percent fines are used as fill, the materials may be moisture sensitive and degrade with increases in moisture content. Therefore, heavy rubber- tired equipment should not be allowed to travel over the fill surface until the moisture content of the soils has been reduced by aeration. We anticipate compaction of new fill will generally be performed using large vibratory rollers. The vibrations caused by the equipment can potentially affect nearby and off-site structures. Therefore, prior to commencing compaction, surveys of existing conditions documenting cracks, or other visual indicators of distress documented in nearby buildings should be performed. Heavy vibratory compaction equipment should not be used within 200 feet of existing structures. If site preparation operations are not continuous from start to finish or a long period of inclement weather interrupts site preparation after the site has been assessed as previously described, the surface receiving fill should be scarified to a depth of 6 inches and re -compacted before placement of fill resumes. If grading occurs during wet, cool weather, when drying soils is more difficult and time-consuming, the grading contractor may have difficulty achieving suitable moisture conditions for proper compaction of soil fill. 4.7 Drainage Considerations Site development and excavations should not be performed during or immediately following periods of heavy precipitation. Positive surface drainage should be maintained during grading operations and construction to prevent water from ponding on the surface. Surface water run -off from off-site areas should be diverted around the site using berms or ditches. The surface can be rolled smooth to enhance drainage if precipitation is expected, but it should be scarified prior to resuming fill placement. Maintaining proper site drainage during construction is important for this site because the soils at the site may be sensitive to increases in moisture content and may quickly become wet, soft, and unstable if water is allowed to pond on them. Subgrades damaged by construction equipment should be promptly repaired. Our geoprofessional should provide recommendations for treatment if the subgrade materials become wet or dry. When work activities are interrupted by heavy rainfall, fill operations should not be resumed until the moisture content and density of the previously placed fill materials are as recommended in this report. 4.8 Groundwater Control Groundwater was measured in the borings at depths ranging between 1-½ and 3 feet below existing grades. Therefore, we anticipate groundwater control will be required from even shallow excavations required for the project. We anticipate well points or other methods will be required to maintain groundwater to a level of 2 feet below the base of excavations. Given the relative change of 283 CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. – 7Brew (Winter Springs, Florida) December 19, 2024 TTL Project No. 000240803190.00 Page 11 groundwater levels at the property due to seasonal changes, the contractor should determine the groundwater levels at the time of construction to determine the impact groundwater could have on the construction. Well points or other methods will be required to maintain groundwater to a level of 2 feet below the bottom of excavations. The groundwater level should be maintained at this depth continuously throughout the construction. 5.0 INFRASTRUCTURE RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 Pavement Recommendations We have developed our recommendations based on the following assumptions: • The pavement loadings and design criteria presented previously in this report. • Terminal Serviceability: 2.0 | Reliability: 85 percent | Initial Serviceability: 4.2 • Standard Deviation: 0.35 (rigid) and 0.45 (flexible) • Design Life: 20 years • The concrete for rigid pavements has a 28-day compressive strength of 3,500 psi. • The pavement joints, dowels, materials, placement methods, etc. will conform to applicable sections of the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, latest edition. The pavement recommendations in this report do not account for construction traffic. We recommend construction traffic not be allowed on asphalt pavement layers. If desired, construction traffic can travel over the installed base, provided the base is re-evaluated and repaired prior to placement of asphalt. Repair may require removal of some, or all, of the base if it has become contaminated with soil. The soil subgrade may also require repair consisting of undercutting and replacing with compacted fill or additional base materials. Subgrade repairs needed as a result of construction traffic on the base should not result in extra charges to the Owner as the use of pavement subgrades for construction traffic falls under the contractor’s means and methods of construction. We anticipate the Limerock Bearing Ratio (LBR) of the on-site marine sediments or fill will be less than 40. Therefore, stabilization of the on-site materials using gravel, limerock, or soil fines may be required to achieve the recommended criteria. If the contractor elects to attempt to modify the soils by blending materials, a mix design should be performed to determine the appropriate mix proportions. The mix design should be performed prior to bidding and construction. 5.1.1 Flexible Pavement Sections Flexible pavements for the facility should consist of asphaltic concrete over a compacted base course, underlain by a compacted Stabilized Subgrade Course (SCC). The stabilized subgrade should 284 CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. – 7Brew (Winter Springs, Florida) December 19, 2024 TTL Project No. 000240803190.00 Page 12 have a minimum LBR value of 40, with the material compacted to 98 percent of the modified Proctor maximum dry density and at a moisture content within 2 percent of the optimum moisture content. The recommended flexible pavement section thicknesses are provided in the table below. Pavement Usage Asphalt Base Course1,2 Stabilized Subgrade Course (SSC) (Minimum LBR of 40) Light-Duty (no trucks) 2 inches 6 inches 6 inches Heavy-Duty 3 inches 6 inches 6 inches 1 Limerock should have a minimum LBR of 100 and should be obtained from an FDOT approved source. 2 Place limerock in maximum 6-inch lifts and compact each lift to a minimum density of 98 percent of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density and within two percent of the material’s optimum moisture content. As previously reported, our limited laboratory testing suggests the near-surface materials DO NOT meet the minimum LBR requirement of 40 for the SSC and stabilization of the subgrade soils WILL be required. Comments about modifying the on-site soil to achieve the recommended criteria were provided in Section 5.1 and are applicable for flexible pavements. Any imported material within the upper 6 inches of the pavement system should have a minimum LBR value of 40. For materials not meeting an LBR of 40, an attempt can be made to stabilize the subgrade materials to this value as specified by FDOT requirements for Type B Stabilized Subgrade. following items are applicable to asphalt concrete pavement sections: • A minimum separation of 12 inches between the bottom of the base course and the seasonal high groundwater table should be maintained • Fill or in-place subgrade materials beneath the pavements and to a depth of 18 inches below subgrade materials should consist of free draining sands with less than 5 percent of the material passing a No. 200 sieve • SSC materials should be stabilized to a minimum LBR value of 40. Materials not meeting this criterion should be modified or replaced with new compacted fill that meets the minimum LBR value. • The SSC should be compacted to at least 98 percent of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D1557). Materials underlying the SSC should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density. • Limerock base courses from an approved FDOT source should have a minimum LBR value of 100 and be compacted to a minimum of 98 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by the Modified Proctor test. Limerock should be placed in uniform lifts less than 6 inches loose thickness. Recycled limerock is not a suitable substitute for virgin limerock for base course but may be used as a granular stabilizing admixture. • Soil cement base course may be used in lieu of limerock Soil cement may experience shrinkage resulting in cracking that propagates through the asphalt and 285 CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. – 7Brew (Winter Springs, Florida) December 19, 2024 TTL Project No. 000240803190.00 Page 13 reflect in the pavement surface. The reflective cracking is not necessarily indicative of a pavement structural failure, though it is sometimes considered to be aesthetically undesirable. Soil cement bases should have a 7-day design strength of 300 psi. • Crushed (recycled) concrete base should meet the current FDOT specification 911 for recycled materials. • Underdrains or strip drains should be considered along all landscaped areas in, or adjacent to pavements to reduce moisture migration to subgrade soils. Underdrains will also be required below pavement if the separation between the bottom of the base course and the seasonal high groundwater table is less than 1 foot. • Curbing should be full depth because extruded curb sections can allow migration of water between the surface and base courses. 5.1.2 Rigid Pavement Sections Recommended rigid pavement section thicknesses are provided in the table below. Rigid pavement sections should be used for dumpster pads (8 inches) and should be long enough to support both the dumpster and truck during transfer. A thickened edge should also be used for this application. We recommend using the following rigid pavement section thicknesses: RECOMMENDED RIGID PAVEMENT SECTIONS Material Pavement Loading Light-Duty (no trucks allowed) Heavy-Duty PCC Slab 5 inches 6 inches Limerock Base Course1,2 4 inches 4 inches Stabilized Subgrade Course (LBR > 40) 6 inches 6 inches 1 Limerock should have a minimum LBR of 100 percent and should be obtained from an FDOT approved source. 2 The limerock should be compacted to a minimum density of 98 percent of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density and within 2 percent of the material’s optimum moisture content. As previously reported, our limited laboratory testing suggests the near-surface materials DO NOT meet the minimum LBR requirement of 40 for the SSC and stabilization of the subgrade soils WILL be required. Comments about modifying the on-site soil to achieve the recommended criteria were provided in Section 5.1 and are applicable for rigid pavements. Any imported material within the upper 6 inches of the pavement system should have a minimum LBR value of 40. For materials not meeting an LBR of 40, an attempt can be made to stabilize the subgrade materials to this value as specified by FDOT requirements for Type B Stabilized Subgrade. Depending on the characteristics of materials used as fill, some rutting of the subgrade may be experienced as heavy trucks and paving equipment traverse the subgrade. This condition will likely 286 CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. – 7Brew (Winter Springs, Florida) December 19, 2024 TTL Project No. 000240803190.00 Page 14 be more prominent if “SP” or “SP-SC” sands are used as fill or are exposed at the subgrade level. An effective approach to avoiding these problems is to substitute a material such as crushed concrete for the 12-inch layer of compacted sub-base. Crushed concrete is commonly used for this application but its availability for projects is time dependent. Please be aware, local municipalities may limit the use of certain base course materials. We recommend the civil engineer consult with the local municipalities prior to selecting the base course material for this project. If crushed concrete base is used, the base course material should be sourced from an FDOT approved supplier. The base should be compacted to a minimum density of 100 percent of the modified Proctor maximum dry density and exhibit a minimum LBR of 150. The base material should comply and be placed in accordance with the latest edition of the FDOT Road and Bridge Construction Specifications Supplemental Section 204-2.2 – “Reclaimed Concrete Aggregate Base Materials”. In order to ensure consistency of the crushed concrete material, additional LBR and sieve gradation tests should be performed at a minimum frequency of one test per 15,000 square feet, and for each visual change in material. The following items are applicable to rigid concrete pavement sections. • At least 18 inches of free-draining material should be included directly beneath rigid concrete pavement. Fill meeting the requirements provided in Section 4.6 may be considered free draining for this purpose. Limerock should not be considered free draining for this purpose. • The upper 1 foot of rigid pavement subgrade soils should be compacted to at least 98 percent of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D1557). • Expansion (isolation) joints should be full depth and only be used to isolate fixed objects abutting or within the paved area. • Adequate separation should be provided between the bottom of the concrete and the seasonal high groundwater table. We recommend that in no case should less than 1 foot of separation be provided. • Contraction joints should be sawed as soon as the concrete will allow. The joints should be subsequently sealed to reduce surface water infiltration into the prepared subbase. • Construction joints (excludes saw joints) should be underlain by a non-woven geotextile (about 2 feet wide, centered along the joint) to reduce the potential for the upward movement of soil fines through the joints. • Loading (traffic) should not be allowed until the concrete has achieved at least 85 percent of its design strength. • Landscape beds or islands should not be used because they may provide a means for water to enter into the pavement section and underlying soil subgrade. If landscape is desired, above-grade planter boxes with drainage discharge onto the top of the pavement or directed into sewers should be used in the construction. 287 CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. – 7Brew (Winter Springs, Florida) December 19, 2024 TTL Project No. 000240803190.00 Page 15 • Curbs should extend at least 3 inches below the base course (vertical curb). This can help reduce migration of subsurface water into the pavement base from adjacent areas. • The concrete should contain entrained air to improve durability. The air content should be compatible with the maximum aggregate size and the project location. • The pavement surface should have positive slope to promote surface drainage. 5.1.3 General Pavement Considerations Experience has shown most pavement failures are caused by localized soft spots in the subgrade or by inadequate drainage. Proofrolling observed by our geotechnical engineer can help identify weak spots in the subgrade, which should be repaired. The civil design should include proper drainage to reduce the potential for softening of the subgrade, soil migration, and pumping failures. The pavement surface and subgrade should be sloped to promote drainage. Concrete pads should be constructed around catch basins to accommodate the problems associated with the frequent saturation of asphalt pavements in low areas. Good perimeter drainage around the pavements is also recommended. Site grading is generally accomplished early in the construction phase. As construction proceeds, the subgrade may be disturbed due to utility excavations, construction traffic, desiccation, or rainfall. As a result, sections of the pavement subgrade may degrade and require remedial repair. The subgrade should be evaluated at the time of pavement construction by proofrolling. Particular attention should be given to high traffic areas that were rutted and disturbed and to areas where backfilled trenches are located. Unstable areas should be repaired in the manner described earlier. Also, we recommend the moisture content of the exposed soils be checked immediately prior to pavement construction. If the soil is not within the specified range, the upper 8 inches to 12 inches should be scarified, moisture conditioned to the recommended moisture content, and recompacted. We recommend the base stone be "day-lighted" at the edge of the pavement, if possible (not practical if curb and gutter is included). During construction of the base, in-place density tests and thickness checks should be performed to evaluate compliance with project specifications. If a significant delay occurs between installation of the base and installation of the pavement surface, the base should again be proofrolled prior to paving to check for a loss in stability. Any base materials “contaminated” with soil materials should be completely removed and replaced before paving. Regular maintenance is essential to good, long-term pavement performance. Distressed areas that develop should be promptly repaired to inhibit the failure from spreading due to loading and water infiltration. Cracks should be sealed to reduce surface water infiltration below pavements. 288 CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. – 7Brew (Winter Springs, Florida) December 19, 2024 TTL Project No. 000240803190.00 Page 16 6.0 STRUCTURAL RECOMMENDATIONS 6.1 Seismic Site Classification The International Building Code (IBC) requires consideration of the materials in the upper 100 feet of the subsurface profile. Our scope of services did not include drilling a borehole to this depth. According to the IBC, where the soil properties are not known in sufficient detail to determine the Seismic Site Class, Site Class D should be used unless the authority having jurisdiction or geotechnical data determine that Site Class E or F soils are present at the site. From our understanding of the geology of the site, we do not expect Site Class E or F will apply at the site, so we recommend using Site Class D for seismic design. If seismic design parameters based on the recommended site class produces excessive forces or an unfavorable Design Category, it may be possible to reduce the seismic design parameters by performing additional testing and analysis. We can assist you with shear wave velocity testing and a site-specific seismic study as additional services, if requested. 6.2 Shallow Foundations We recommend the building be supported by spread footings designed using the recommendations provided in this section. Design Considerations Value Suitable bearing materials Densified on-site marine sediments or compacted fill Minimum bearing depth below exterior grade 2 feet Allowable net bearing pressure for sustained loads 2,000 psf Minimum isolated spread footing width 2 feet Minimum continuous wall footing width 1.5 feet Potential total and differential foundation settlements 1 Differential settlement assumes between column lines spaced 40 feet center to center Less than 1 inch total and ½ inch differential1 Ultimate coefficient of friction between concrete and bearing material for lateral load resistance 0.40 bearing on sand Minimum factor of safety for lateral resistance from friction 1.5 Ultimate passive pressure from soil against vertical face of footing for lateral load resistance (Do Not Use if footing is formed) 250 psf per vertical foot Neglect resistance in top 1 foot unless ground surface is protected by floor slab or pavement Minimum factor of safety for lateral resistance from passive soil pressure 2.0 Total unit weight for backfill over footings for computing ultimate uplift resistance 100 pcf Minimum factor of safety for uplift resistance from soil backfill weight 2.0 289 CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. – 7Brew (Winter Springs, Florida) December 19, 2024 TTL Project No. 000240803190.00 Page 17 The excavation process and foot traffic may create a loose veneer in the footing bottoms excavated into the silty sands. We recommend that the upper 24 Inches of support materials be recompacted to the requirements specified previously in this report prior to placing steel reinforcement and casting foundation concrete. Additional design and construction recommendations are provided below: • Foundation bearing surfaces should be level and free of loose or soft soil, unsuitable material (such as debris, trash, etc.), ponded water, or desiccation cracks. • Foundation excavations should be backfilled with concrete the same day the footing excavations are open. • If footing excavations are left open for more than a day, the contractor should protect the bearing materials against degradation from exposure. One method commonly used is placing a “mud-mat” of lean concrete, but other similar methods may also be appropriate. Protective layers should not be placed until after the bearing surfaces have been evaluated to confirm they are suitable for the design bearing pressure. • Surface water should not be allowed to flow into footing excavations. Water that enters the excavation, either from surface flow, precipitation, or other sources, should be promptly removed, even if the bearing level is covered by a protective layer, like a mud-mat. • Footings should be poured directly against the sides of the excavation. If the footings are formed, the excavated space around the finished footing should be cleaned of soft or loose soil and then backfilled as soon as practical using soil compacted to the requirements for compacted fill. Passive resistance should not be considered for the foundations if they are formed. Our geoprofessional should observe the materials exposed at the footing support level to check whether or not the exposed soils are consistent with the materials encountered at the test locations. Evaluation of bearing capacity should include hand auger borings extending at least 3 feet below the bearing surface. Soft or unsuitable materials present at and below the footing support level should be undercut to medium-dense, undisturbed soils. The undercuts should be backfilled with compacted fill, lean concrete, or flowable fill. 6.3 Floor Slab The building floor slab can be a concrete slab-on-grade floor, as long as the subgrade is prepared in accordance with the recommendations presented in this report. A minimum 4-inch-thick layer of compacted granular base should be placed beneath the floor slab to provide a protective cover and uniform working surface. The slab should be structurally separated from walls and columns and an appropriate number of control joints should be incorporated into the slab to allow for differential movements. 290 CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. – 7Brew (Winter Springs, Florida) December 19, 2024 TTL Project No. 000240803190.00 Page 18 The Florida Building Code requires a vapor barrier be incorporated into the slab design and construction. We recommend a minimum 15-mil thick polyvinyl chloride or polyethylene sheet membrane for this application. The vapor barrier should be installed in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations, including lapping and sealing. The performance of the vapor barrier will be dependent on installation procedures. Any tears, punctures, or other non-conforming conditions should be repaired in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations prior to grade slab construction. Foundation and utility line installation, weather, and other construction activities can disturb the floor slab subgrade between completion of grading and slab construction. Therefore, our geotechnical engineer should evaluate the subgrade immediately prior to placing the base material and slab concrete. During this observation, the subgrade should be proofrolled according to Section 4.3, if practical. Alternative methods to evaluate the subgrade, such as probing or Dynamic Cone Penetrometer testing (ASTM STP-399), should be used if proofrolling is not practical. Unstable or soft areas should be undercut and replaced as recommended by the geotechnical engineer. We also recommend the moisture content of the subgrade materials be checked immediately prior to placing the base materials. If the soil moisture content is not within the ranges recommended in this report, the upper 8 inches should be scarified, moisture conditioned to the recommended moisture content range, and re-compacted. Unstable or soft areas should be undercut and replaced as recommended by our geotechnical engineer. 7.0 LIMITATIONS This geotechnical engineering report has been prepared for the exclusive use of our Client for specific application to this project. The report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices using that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by licensed members of the engineering profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the same locale. No warranties, expressed or implied, are intended or made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the client and their respective successors and assigns. Third-parties receiving a copy of this report shall understand it is for information only and not for legal reliance. TTL should be invited and authorized to attend project meetings (in person or teleconferencing) or to address applicable issues relating to the geotechnical engineering aspects of the project. TTL should also be retained to review the final construction plans and specifications to evaluate if the information and recommendations in this geotechnical engineering report have been properly interpreted and implemented in the design and specifications. This report has not been prepared as, and should not be used as, a design or specification document to be directly implemented by the contractor. The contractor and applicable subcontractors should familiarize themselves with this report prior to the start of their construction activities, contact TTL for any 291 CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. – 7Brew (Winter Springs, Florida) December 19, 2024 TTL Project No. 000240803190.00 Page 19 interpretation or clarification of the report, retain the services of their own consultants to interpret this report, or perform additional geotechnical testing prior to bidding and construction. This geotechnical engineering report is based on information provided to us by the Client and various other individuals and entities associated with the project, exploratory borings drilled within the project limits, laboratory testing of selected soil samples recovered from the borings, and our engineering analyses and evaluation. The Client and readers of this geotechnical engineering report should realize that subsurface variations and anomalies can and may exist across the site and between the exploratory boring locations. Site conditions can change due to the modifying effects of seasonal and climatic conditions, such that conditions at times after the exploration may be different than reported herein. The nature and extent of such site or subsurface variations may not become evident until construction commences or is in progress. If site and subsurface anomalies or variations are encountered, TTL should be contacted immediately and authorized to evaluate such conditions and, if necessary, provide applicable recommendations. Unless stated otherwise in this report or in the contract documents between TTL and Client, our scope of services for this project did not include, either specifically or by implication, any environmental or biological assessment of the site, or any identification or prevention of pollutants, hazardous materials or conditions at the site. If the Client is concerned about the potential for such contamination or pollution, TTL should be contacted to provide a scope of additional services to address the environmental concerns. Also, permitting, site safety, excavation support, and dewatering requirements are the responsibility of others. Should the nature, design, or location of the project be modified, the geotechnical engineering recommendations and guidelines provided in this document will not be considered valid unless TTL is authorized to review the changes and either verifies or modifies the applicable recommendations in writing. Additional information about the use and limitations of a geotechnical report is provided within the Geoprofessional Business Association document included at the end of this report. 292 Geotechnical-Engineering Report Important Information about This Subsurface problems are a principal cause of construction delays, cost overruns, claims, and disputes. While you cannot eliminate all such risks, you can manage them. The following information is provided to help. The Geoprofessional Business Association (GBA) has prepared this advisory to help you – assumedly a client representative – interpret and apply this geotechnical-engineering report as effectively as possible. In that way, you can benefit from a lowered exposure to problems associated with subsurface conditions at project sites and development of them that, for decades, have been a principal cause of construction delays, cost overruns, claims, and disputes. If you have questions or want more information about any of the issues discussed herein, contact your GBA-member geotechnical engineer. Active engagement in GBA exposes geotechnical engineers to a wide array of risk-confrontation techniques that can be of genuine benefit for everyone involved with a construction project. Understand the Geotechnical-Engineering Services Provided for this Report Geotechnical-engineering services typically include the planning, collection, interpretation, and analysis of exploratory data from widely spaced borings and/or test pits. Field data are combined with results from laboratory tests of soil and rock samples obtained from field exploration (if applicable), observations made during site reconnaissance, and historical information to form one or more models of the expected subsurface conditions beneath the site. Local geology and alterations of the site surface and subsurface by previous and proposed construction are also important considerations. Geotechnical engineers apply their engineering training, experience, and judgment to adapt the requirements of the prospective project to the subsurface model(s). Estimates are made of the subsurface conditions that will likely be exposed during construction as well as the expected performance of foundations and other structures being planned and/or affected by construction activities. The culmination of these geotechnical-engineering services is typically a geotechnical-engineering report providing the data obtained, a discussion of the subsurface model(s), the engineering and geologic engineering assessments and analyses made, and the recommendations developed to satisfy the given requirements of the project. These reports may be titled investigations, explorations, studies, assessments, or evaluations. Regardless of the title used, the geotechnical-engineering report is an engineering interpretation of the subsurface conditions within the context of the project and does not represent a close examination, systematic inquiry, or thorough investigation of all site and subsurface conditions. Geotechnical-Engineering Services are Performed for Specific Purposes, Persons, and Projects, and At Specific Times Geotechnical engineers structure their services to meet the specific needs, goals, and risk management preferences of their clients. A geotechnical-engineering study conducted for a given civil engineer will not likely meet the needs of a civil-works constructor or even a different civil engineer. Because each geotechnical-engineering study is unique, each geotechnical-engineering report is unique, prepared solely for the client. Likewise, geotechnical-engineering services are performed for a specific project and purpose. For example, it is unlikely that a geotechnical- engineering study for a refrigerated warehouse will be the same as one prepared for a parking garage; and a few borings drilled during a preliminary study to evaluate site feasibility will not be adequate to develop geotechnical design recommendations for the project. Do not rely on this report if your geotechnical engineer prepared it: • for a different client; • for a different project or purpose; • for a different site (that may or may not include all or a portion of the original site); or • before important events occurred at the site or adjacent to it; e.g., man-made events like construction or environmental remediation, or natural events like floods, droughts, earthquakes, or groundwater fluctuations. Note, too, the reliability of a geotechnical-engineering report can be affected by the passage of time, because of factors like changed subsurface conditions; new or modified codes, standards, or regulations; or new techniques or tools. If you are the least bit uncertain about the continued reliability of this report, contact your geotechnical engineer before applying the recommendations in it. A minor amount of additional testing or analysis after the passage of time – if any is required at all – could prevent major problems. Read this Report in Full Costly problems have occurred because those relying on a geotechnical- engineering report did not read the report in its entirety. Do not rely on an executive summary. Do not read selective elements only. Read and refer to the report in full. You Need to Inform Your Geotechnical Engineer About Change Your geotechnical engineer considered unique, project-specific factors when developing the scope of study behind this report and developing the confirmation-dependent recommendations the report conveys. Typical changes that could erode the reliability of this report include those that affect: • the site’s size or shape; • the elevation, configuration, location, orientation, function or weight of the proposed structure and the desired performance criteria; • the composition of the design team; or • project ownership. As a general rule, always inform your geotechnical engineer of project or site changes – even minor ones – and request an assessment of their impact. The geotechnical engineer who prepared this report cannot accept 293 responsibility or liability for problems that arise because the geotechnical engineer was not informed about developments the engineer otherwise would have considered. Most of the “Findings” Related in This Report Are Professional Opinions Before construction begins, geotechnical engineers explore a site’s subsurface using various sampling and testing procedures. Geotechnical engineers can observe actual subsurface conditions only at those specific locations where sampling and testing is performed. The data derived from that sampling and testing were reviewed by your geotechnical engineer, who then applied professional judgement to form opinions about subsurface conditions throughout the site. Actual sitewide-subsurface conditions may differ – maybe significantly – from those indicated in this report. Confront that risk by retaining your geotechnical engineer to serve on the design team through project completion to obtain informed guidance quickly, whenever needed. This Report’s Recommendations Are Confirmation-Dependent The recommendations included in this report – including any options or alternatives – are confirmation-dependent. In other words, they are not final, because the geotechnical engineer who developed them relied heavily on judgement and opinion to do so. Your geotechnical engineer can finalize the recommendations only after observing actual subsurface conditions exposed during construction. If through observation your geotechnical engineer confirms that the conditions assumed to exist actually do exist, the recommendations can be relied upon, assuming no other changes have occurred. The geotechnical engineer who prepared this report cannot assume responsibility or liability for confirmation-dependent recommendations if you fail to retain that engineer to perform construction observation. This Report Could Be Misinterpreted Other design professionals’ misinterpretation of geotechnical- engineering reports has resulted in costly problems. Confront that risk by having your geotechnical engineer serve as a continuing member of the design team, to: • confer with other design-team members; • help develop specifications; • review pertinent elements of other design professionals’ plans and specifications; and • be available whenever geotechnical-engineering guidance is needed. You should also confront the risk of constructors misinterpreting this report. Do so by retaining your geotechnical engineer to participate in prebid and preconstruction conferences and to perform construction- phase observations. Give Constructors a Complete Report and Guidance Some owners and design professionals mistakenly believe they can shift unanticipated-subsurface-conditions liability to constructors by limiting the information they provide for bid preparation. To help prevent the costly, contentious problems this practice has caused, include the complete geotechnical-engineering report, along with any attachments or appendices, with your contract documents, but be certain to note conspicuously that you’ve included the material for information purposes only. To avoid misunderstanding, you may also want to note that “informational purposes” means constructors have no right to rely on the interpretations, opinions, conclusions, or recommendations in the report. Be certain that constructors know they may learn about specific project requirements, including options selected from the report, only from the design drawings and specifications. Remind constructors that they may perform their own studies if they want to, and be sure to allow enough time to permit them to do so. Only then might you be in a position to give constructors the information available to you, while requiring them to at least share some of the financial responsibilities stemming from unanticipated conditions. Conducting prebid and preconstruction conferences can also be valuable in this respect. Read Responsibility Provisions Closely Some client representatives, design professionals, and constructors do not realize that geotechnical engineering is far less exact than other engineering disciplines. This happens in part because soil and rock on project sites are typically heterogeneous and not manufactured materials with well-defined engineering properties like steel and concrete. That lack of understanding has nurtured unrealistic expectations that have resulted in disappointments, delays, cost overruns, claims, and disputes. To confront that risk, geotechnical engineers commonly include explanatory provisions in their reports. Sometimes labeled “limitations,” many of these provisions indicate where geotechnical engineers’ responsibilities begin and end, to help others recognize their own responsibilities and risks. Read these provisions closely. Ask questions. Your geotechnical engineer should respond fully and frankly. Geoenvironmental Concerns Are Not Covered The personnel, equipment, and techniques used to perform an environmental study – e.g., a “phase-one” or “phase-two” environmental site assessment – differ significantly from those used to perform a geotechnical-engineering study. For that reason, a geotechnical-engineering report does not usually provide environmental findings, conclusions, or recommendations; e.g., about the likelihood of encountering underground storage tanks or regulated contaminants. Unanticipated subsurface environmental problems have led to project failures. If you have not obtained your own environmental information about the project site, ask your geotechnical consultant for a recommendation on how to find environmental risk-management guidance. Obtain Professional Assistance to Deal with Moisture Infiltration and Mold While your geotechnical engineer may have addressed groundwater, water infiltration, or similar issues in this report, the engineer’s services were not designed, conducted, or intended to prevent migration of moisture – including water vapor – from the soil through building slabs and walls and into the building interior, where it can cause mold growth and material-performance deficiencies. Accordingly, proper implementation of the geotechnical engineer’s recommendations will not of itself be sufficient to prevent moisture infiltration. Confront the risk of moisture infiltration by including building-envelope or mold specialists on the design team. Geotechnical engineers are not building-envelope or mold specialists. Copyright 2019 by Geoprofessional Business Association (GBA). Duplication, reproduction, or copying of this document, in whole or in part, by any means whatsoever, is strictly prohibited, except with GBA’s specific written permission. Excerpting, quoting, or otherwise extracting wording from this document is permitted only with the express written permission of GBA, and only for purposes of scholarly research or book review. Only members of GBA may use this document or its wording as a complement to or as an element of a report of any kind. Any other firm, individual, or other entity that so uses this document without being a GBA member could be committing negligent or intentional (fraudulent) misrepresentation. Telephone: 301/565-2733 e-mail: info@geoprofessional.org www.geoprofessional.org 294 APPENDIX A ILLUSTRATIONS 295 CEI ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. SITE LOCATIONMAP SITE LOCATION 624 Grassmere Park, Suite #14 | Nashville, TN 37211 615.331.7770 | www.ttlusa.com Sheet Title 24.8.3190 SLM.dwg File Name: Drawn By: Checked By: Proj. No.: Date: 000240803190.00 12/16/2024 MAH MHM MAP DATA: 2024 MICROSOFT BING MAPS NO SCALE MICHAEL BLAKE BOULEVARD AND EAST FLORIDA 434 SITE LOCATION SEMINOLE CO. WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 7BRE: 296 WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA CEI ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. 7BREW 7*UDVVPHUH3DUN6XLWH_1DVKYLOOH71 777_ZZZWWOXVDFRP 6KHHW7LWOH E/3GZJ )LOH1DPH 'UDZQB\ &KHFNHGB\ 3URM1R 'DWH   0$+ 0+0 MICHAEL BLAKE BOULEVARD AND EAST FLORIDA 434 EXPLORATIONNLOCATION PLA LEGEND 62,/B2R,1* /2&$7,21$1','E17,),ER B 'R$W,1*628R&E3R2BER76$&$'E0<'$7E'3R29,'E'B<B$R*E&,9,/$662&,$7E6  6&$/E,1)EE7 127E6 B2R,1*/2&$7,2166+2W1217+,6'R$W,1*$RE$33R2;,0$7E BB B B E $ 6 7  F L O R I D A      297 0 - 1 2 - 4 0.25 - 0.5 5 - 8 9 - 15 1.0 - 2.0Stiff 16 - 30 2.0 - 4.0 Hard Relative Density Very Loose Loose Medium Dense Dense Descriptive Terms RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF CLAYS AND SILTS < 5 5 - 12 > 12 SPT N-Value Consistency Estimated Qu (TSF) 0 - 0.25Very Soft Soft 0.5 - 1.0Firm Very Stiff 5 - 10 11 - 30 31 - 50 SPT N-Value FINE-GRAINED SOILS (SILTS AND CLAYS) COARSE-GRAINED SOILS (SANDS AND GRAVELS) Very Dense < 15 RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF SAND AND GRAVEL Descriptive Terms "Trace" "With" Percent of Dry Weight Modifier > 30 "Trace" "With" Percent of Dry Weight Modifier 51+ 4.0+ CRITERIA FOR DESCRIBING MOISTURE CONDITION Visible free water, usually soil is below water table Description Dry Dynamic Cone Penetrometer Moist Criteria PARTICLE SIZE >300 mm (>12 in.) 0.075 mm to 0.425 mm (#200 - #40) Wet Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to the touch Damp, but no visible water N-Value CRITERIA FOR DESCRIBING CEMENTATION Description Laminated Fissured Will not crumble or break with finger pressure Criteria Crumbles or breaks with handling or little finger pressure Description Weak Moderate Strong Criteria CRITERIA FOR DESCRIBING STRUCTURE Stratified Slickensided SAMPLERS AND DRILLING METHODS AUGER CUTTINGS BAG/BULK SAMPLE Alternating layers of varying material or color with layers at least 6 mm thick; note the thickness Fracture planes appear polished or glossy, sometimes striated Blocky ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS WOH WOR Ref. SHELBY TUBE SAMPLE GRAB SAMPLE DYNAMIC CONE PENETROMETER CONTINUOUS SAMPLES STANDARD PENETRATION SPLIT-SPOON SAMPLE ROCK CORE PITCHER SAMPLE WATER LEVEL SYMBOLS Crumbles or breaks with considerable finger pressure WATER LEVEL AT TIME OF DRILLING PERCHED WATER OBSERVED AT DRILLING DELAYED WATER LEVEL OBSERVATION CAVE-IN DEPTH OBSERVED SEEPAGE Alternating layers of varying material or color with the layers less than 6 mm thick; note thickness Breaks along definite planes of fracture with little resistance to fracturing Lensed Homogeneous Cohesive soil that can be broken down into small angular lumps which resist further breakdown Inclusion of small pockets of different soils such as small lenses of sand scattered through a mass of clay; note thickness Same color and appearance throughout Weight of Hammer Weight of Rod Refusal At Time of DrillingATD DCP Sum of the blows for last two 6-in increments of SPT Elev. NA Not Applicable or Not Available Outside DiameterOD 0 - 4 31+ Elevation ft. HSA Hollow Stem Auger ID Inside Diameter 2 mm to 4.75 mm (#10 - #4) 0.425 mm to 2 mm (#40 - #10) Silts and Clays in. lbs inches pounds feet SS SPT Standard Penetration Test Split-Spoon Sampler SPLIT-SPOON SAMPLE WITH NO RECOVERY Pocket Penetrometer ValuePPV FINE- AND COARSE-GRAINED SOIL INFORMATION 75 mm to 300 mm (3 - 12 in.) Name Boulders Cobbles Size (US Std. Sieve) < 0.075 mm (< #200) Coarse Sand Medium Sand Fine Sand 19 mm to 75 mm (3/4 - 3 in.) 4.75 mm to 19 mm (#4 - 3/4 in.)Fine Gravel Coarse Gravel Qu = Unconfined Compression Strength 15 - 30 USCS Unified Soil Classification System Solid Flight Auger SH Shelby Tube Sampler SFA SOIL LEGEND 298 GP CLEAN GRAVEL WITH <5% FINES GW-GM GW-GC ML GP-GM GP-GC GRAVEL WITH 5% TO 12% FINES UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (USCS) GM GC Well-graded gravels, gravel-sand mixtures with clay fines Well-graded sands, sand-gravel mixtures with trace or no fines GC-GM USCS - HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS OTHER MATERIALS CONCRETE CRUSHED STONE/AGGREGATE BASE SA N D S ( > 5 0 % o f c o a r s e f r a c t i o n i s s m a l l e r t h a n t h e # 4 s i e v e ) CLEAN SAND WITH <5% FINES SAND WITH 5% TO 12% FINES SW SP SP-SM SM SC SC-SM Silty sands, sand-gravel-silt mixtures Clayey sands, sand-gravel-clay mixtures GRAVEL WITH MORE THAN 12% FINES Poorly-graded gravels, gravel-sand mixtures with trace or no fines Poorly-graded sands, sand-gravel mixtures with clay fines Poorly-graded sands, sand-gravel mixtures with trace or no fines Clayey sands, sand-gravel-clay-silt mixtures SW-SM SW-SC SP-SC GW Silty gravels, gravel-silt-sand mixtures Clayey gravels, gravel-sand-clay mixtures Clayey gravels, gravel-sand-clay-silt mixturesGR A V E L S ( > 5 0 % o f c o a r s e f r a c t i o n i s l a r g e r t h a n t h e # 4 s i e v e ) SAND WITH MORE THAN 12% FINES Poorly-graded gravels, gravel-sand mixtures with clay fines Well-graded sands, sand-gravel mixtures with clay fines CO A R S E G R A I N E D S O I L S ( > 5 0 % o f t h e m a t e r i a l i s l a r g e r t h a n t h e # 2 0 0 s i e v e ) Primarily organic matter, dark in color, organic odor Peat, humus, swamp soils with high organic contents CL CL-ML Inorganic clay-silts of low plasticity, gravelly clays, sandy clays, silty clays, lean clays OL Organic silts and organic silty clays of low plasticity SI L T S & C L A Y S (L i q u i d L i m i t le s s t h a n 5 0 ) MH CH OH PT Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays BITUMINOUS CONCRETE (ASPHALT) UNDIFFERENTIATED OVERBURDEN UNDIFFERENTIATED ALLUVIUM TOPSOIL Well-graded gravels, gravel-sand mixtures with trace or no fines Cu > 4 Cc = 1-3 Cu > 4 Cc = 1-3 Cu < 4 and/or Cc < 1 Cc > 3 Cu > 6 Cc = 1-3 Cu > 6 Cc = 1-3 Cu < 6 and/or Cc < 1 Cc > 3 Well-graded gravels, gravel-sand mixtures with silt fines Poorly-graded gravels, gravel-sand mixtures with silt fines Well-graded sands, sand-gravel mixtures with silt fines Poorly-graded sands, sand-gravel mixtures with silt fines Inorganic clays of low plasticity, gravelly or sandy clays, silty clays, lean clays Inorganic silts with low plasticity Organic clays and organic silts of high plasticitySI L T S & C L A Y S (L i q u i d L i m i t mo r e t h a n 5 0 ) FI N E G R A I N E D S O I L S ( > 5 0 % o f m a t e r i a l i s sm a l l e r t h a n t h e # 2 0 0 s i e v e ) FILL UNIFORMITY COEFFICIENT Cu = D60/D10 COEFFICIENT OF CURVATURE CC = (D30)2/(D60xD10) Where: D60 = grain diameter at 60% passing D30 = grain diameter at 30% passing D10 = grain diameter at 10% passing BOULDERS AND COBBLES Cu < 4 and/or Cc < 1 Cc > 3 Cu < 6 and/or Cc < 1 Cc > 3 Inorganic silts of high plasticity, elastic silts 299 IMPORTANT NOTES ON TEST BORING RECORDS PLASTICITY CHART FOR USCS CLASSIFICATION OF FINE-GRAINED SOILS 1) The report and graphics key are an integral part of these logs. All data and interpretations in this log are subject to the explanations and limitations stated in the report. 2) Lines separating strata on the logs represent approximate boundaries only. Actual transitions may be gradual or differ from those shown. Solid lines are used to indicate a change in the material type, particularly a change in the USCS classification. Dashed lines are used to separate two materials that have the same material type, but that differ with respect to two or more other characteristics (e.g. color, consistency). 3) No warranty is provided as to the continuity of soil or rock conditions between individual sample locations. 4) Logs represent general soil and rock conditions observed at the point of exploration on the date indicated. 5) In general, Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) designations presented on the logs were based on visual classification in the field and were modified where appropriate based on gradation and index property testing. 6) Fine-grained soils that plot within the hatched area on the Plasticity Chart, and coarse-grained soils with between 5% and 12% passing the #200 sieve require dual USCS symbols as presented on the previous page. 7) If the sampler is not able to be driven at least 6 inches, then 50/X" indicates that the sampler advanced X inches when struck 50 times with a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches. 8) If the sampler is driven at least 6 inches, but cannot be driven either of the subsequent two 6-inch increments, then either 50/X" or the sum of the second 6-inch increment plus 50/X" for the third 6-inch increment will be indicated. Example 1: Recorded SPT blow counts are 16 - 50/4", the SPT N-value will be shown as N = 50/4" Example 2: Recorded SPT blow counts are 18 - 25 - 50/2", the SPT N-value will be shown as N = 75/8" 300 Bo r e D M T e m p l a t e : AE P 7Brew (Winter Springs) CEI Engineering and Associates, Inc. Winter Springs, Florida Log of Soil Boring B-01 Page 1 of 1 Drilling Co.:SunCoast Drilling Driller:M. Herra Logged By:M. Herrmann Equipment:BR 2500 Project Number:000240803190.00 Date Drilled:12/03/2024 Boring Depth:15 ft Boring Elevation:N/A Remarks: Borehole backfilled with cuttings and bentonite pellets upon completion. Hammer Type:Auto Coordinates:N/A Drilling Method:Hollow-stem auger w/SPT sampling (wash drilling at 10 ft) Water Level At Time Of Drilling N.E. Cave In 12 ft Delayed Water Level 1.5 ft Delayed Water Date N/A El e v a t i o n ( f e e t ) De p t h ( f e e t ) 5 10 15 Gr a p h i c L o g Materials Description 0.3 4.0 8.0 13.0 15.0 TOPSOIL, , 3 inches MARINE SEDIMENT: POORLY GRADED SAND, fine grained, loose , white, moist to wet (SP) MARINE SEDIMENT: POORLY GRADED SAND, fine grained, loose , tan, wet (SP) MARINE SEDIMENT: SILTY SAND, fine grained, medium dense , dark brown, wet (SM) - begin wash drilling at 10 feet MARINE SEDIMENT: SILTY SAND, fine grained, loose, light brown, wet (SM) Boring terminated at 15 feet Samples Sa m p l e G r a p h i c Bl o w C o u n t s (N/ R e f u s a l ) 2-3-5 (8) 6-5-5 (10) 2-2-3 (5) 3-3-4 (7) 5-5-8 (13) 4-5-5 (10) Re c o v e r y ( % ) RQ D ( % ) Po c k e t Pe n e t r o m e t e r ( t s f ) Lab Mo i s t u r e C o n t e n t ( % ) At t e r b e r g L i m i t s (L L - P L - P I ) % Fi n e s Dr y D e n s i t y ( p c f ) Co m p r e s s i v e S t r e n g t h ( ks f ) This record shall not be separated from the corresponding Instrument of Service; no third party may rely upon this boring log or the corresponding Instrument of Service absent a written TTL Secondary Client Agreement.301 Bo r e D M T e m p l a t e : AE P 7Brew (Winter Springs) CEI Engineering and Associates, Inc. Winter Springs, Florida Log of Soil Boring B-02 Page 1 of 1 Drilling Co.:SunCoast Drilling Driller:M. Herra Logged By:M. Herrmann Equipment:BR 2500 Project Number:000240803190.00 Date Drilled:12/03/2024 Boring Depth:10 ft Boring Elevation:N/A Remarks: Borehole backfilled with cuttings and bentonite pellets upon completion. Hammer Type:Auto Coordinates:N/A Drilling Method:Hollow-stem auger w/SPT sampling Water Level At Time Of Drilling 3 ft Cave In 3 ft Delayed Water Level N/A Delayed Water Date N/A El e v a t i o n ( f e e t ) De p t h ( f e e t ) 5 10 15 Gr a p h i c L o g Materials Description 0.2 4.0 6.0 10.0 TOPSOIL, 2 inches MARINE SEDIMENT: POORLY GRADED SAND, fine grained, loose, white and gray, moist to wet (SP) MARINE SEDIMENT: POORLY GRADED SAND, fine grained, loose, tan, wet (SP) MARINE SEDIMENT: SILTY SAND, fine grained, medium dense, dark brown, wet (SM) Boring terminated at 10 feet Samples Sa m p l e G r a p h i c Bl o w C o u n t s (N/ R e f u s a l ) 1-3-4 (7) 4-4-5 (9) 2-3-2 (5) 4-5-8 (13) 7-10-15 (25) Re c o v e r y ( % ) RQ D ( % ) Po c k e t Pe n e t r o m e t e r ( t s f ) Lab Mo i s t u r e C o n t e n t ( % ) At t e r b e r g L i m i t s (L L - P L - P I ) % Fi n e s Dr y D e n s i t y ( p c f ) Co m p r e s s i v e S t r e n g t h ( ks f ) This record shall not be separated from the corresponding Instrument of Service; no third party may rely upon this boring log or the corresponding Instrument of Service absent a written TTL Secondary Client Agreement.302 Bo r e D M T e m p l a t e : AE P 7Brew (Winter Springs) CEI Engineering and Associates, Inc. Winter Springs, Florida Log of Soil Boring B-03 Page 1 of 1 Drilling Co.:SunCoast Drilling Driller:M. Herra Logged By:M. Herrmann Equipment:BR 2500 Project Number:000240803190.00 Date Drilled:12/03/2024 Boring Depth:10 ft Boring Elevation:N/A Remarks: Borehole backfilled with cuttings and bentonite pellets upon completion. Hammer Type:Auto Coordinates:N/A Drilling Method:Hollow-stem auger w/SPT sampling Water Level At Time Of Drilling 3 ft Cave In 3 ft Delayed Water Level N/A Delayed Water Date N/A El e v a t i o n ( f e e t ) De p t h ( f e e t ) 5 10 15 Gr a p h i c L o g Materials Description 0.2 3.5 6.0 10.0 TOPSOIL, 2 inches MARINE SEDIMENT: POORLY GRADED SAND, fine grained, loose, white and gray, moist to wet (SP) MARINE SEDIMENT: POORLY GRADED SAND, fine grained, loose, brown and white, wet (SP) MARINE SEDIMENT: SILTY SAND, fine grained, loose, gray, wet (SM) Boring terminated at 10 feet Samples Sa m p l e G r a p h i c Bl o w C o u n t s (N/ R e f u s a l ) 3-4-4 (8) 5-4-4 (8) 4-2-3 (5) 4-5-4 (9) 2-3-5 (8) Re c o v e r y ( % ) RQ D ( % ) Po c k e t Pe n e t r o m e t e r ( t s f ) Lab Mo i s t u r e C o n t e n t ( % ) At t e r b e r g L i m i t s (L L - P L - P I ) % Fi n e s Dr y D e n s i t y ( p c f ) Co m p r e s s i v e S t r e n g t h ( ks f ) This record shall not be separated from the corresponding Instrument of Service; no third party may rely upon this boring log or the corresponding Instrument of Service absent a written TTL Secondary Client Agreement.303 Bo r e D M T e m p l a t e : AE P 7Brew (Winter Springs) CEI Engineering and Associates, Inc. Winter Springs, Florida Log of Soil Boring B-04 Page 1 of 1 Drilling Co.:SunCoast Drilling Driller:M. Herra Logged By:M. Herrmann Equipment:BR 2500 Project Number:000240803190.00 Date Drilled:12/03/2024 Boring Depth:10 ft Boring Elevation:N/A Remarks: Borehole backfilled with cuttings and bentonite pellets upon completion. Hammer Type:Auto Coordinates:N/A Drilling Method:Hollow-stem auger w/SPT sampling Water Level At Time Of Drilling 3 ft Cave In 3 ft Delayed Water Level N/A Delayed Water Date N/A El e v a t i o n ( f e e t ) De p t h ( f e e t ) 5 10 15 Gr a p h i c L o g Materials Description 0.2 2.0 4.0 7.0 10.0 TOPSOIL, 2 inches MARINE SEDIMENT: POORLY GRADED SAND, fine grained, loose, dark brown, moist (SP) MARINE SEDIMENT: POORLY GRADED SAND, fine grained, medium dense, white and gray, wet (SP) MARINE SEDIMENT: POORLY GRADED SAND, fine grained, very loose, dark brown, with trace roots, wet (SP) MARINE SEDIMENT: SILTY SAND, fine grained, medium dense, brown, wet (SM) Boring terminated at 10 feet Samples Sa m p l e G r a p h i c Bl o w C o u n t s (N/ R e f u s a l ) 1-2-3 (5) 9-11-13 (24) 2-2-2 (4) 5-8-10 (18) 6-8-10 (18) Re c o v e r y ( % ) RQ D ( % ) Po c k e t Pe n e t r o m e t e r ( t s f ) Lab Mo i s t u r e C o n t e n t ( % ) At t e r b e r g L i m i t s (L L - P L - P I ) % Fi n e s Dr y D e n s i t y ( p c f ) Co m p r e s s i v e S t r e n g t h ( ks f ) This record shall not be separated from the corresponding Instrument of Service; no third party may rely upon this boring log or the corresponding Instrument of Service absent a written TTL Secondary Client Agreement.304 Laboratory Results Summary PROJECT 7Brew PROJECT NO.000240803190.00 CLIENT CEI Engineering and Associates, Inc.LOCATION Winter Springs, Florida Boring ID B-01 B-01 B-01 B-01 B-01 B-01 B-02 B-02 B-02 B-02 B-02 B-03 B-03 B-03 B-03 B-03 B-04 B-04 B-04 B-04 B-04 Depth (ft) 0 2 4 6 8 13.5 0 2 4 6 8 0 2 4 6 8 0 2 4 6 8 Moisture Content (%) 16.9 21.1 22.4 26.7 22.8 24.6 7.1 22.4 25.7 9.8 21.8 13.2 24.2 26.7 22.7 21 29.6 21.9 27.8 18.4 20.6 LL PL PI %Gravel % Sand % Fines Dry Density (PCF)USCS TTL, Inc. | 624 Grassmere Park, Ste. 14, Nashville, TN, 37211 | 615.331.7770 | www.ttlusa.com 305 Project:Project Name: Project No.: Date:Lab Tech: B-01 B-02 B-03 B-04 4 0 2 0 2 hours 2 hours 2 hours 2 hours XYZ01 XYZ07 XYZ09 XYZ05 108.34 117.27 118.24 115.88 441.1 480.75 412.85 370.56 380.24 456.6 355.36 312.44 271.9 339.33 237.12 196.56 374.5 446.66 348.81 309.84 266.16 329.39 230.57 193.96 2.1 2.9 2.8 1.3 Boring No. Sample No. KM/JH1900-05-08 Sample Information CEI Engineering and Associates, Inc ASTM D 1140 - Standard Test Method for Material in Soils Finer Than No. 200 Sieve 7Brew (Winter Springs, FL) 000240803190.00 Depth Soak Time * Percent Passing No. 200 Determination Tare No. Before Sieve - Wet Sample + Tare (g) Tare Mass (g) * Cohesive soils require minumum 2-hour soaking period prior to testing; Non-cohesive soils require a minimum 10 minute soaking period Before Sieve - Dry Sample + Tare (g) After Seive - Dry Sample + Tare (g) After Sieve - Dry Sample (g) Before Sieve - Dry Sample (g) Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve 306 APPENDIX B REFERENCE MATERIALS 307 CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. – 7Brew (Winter Springs, FL) December 19, 2024 TTL Project No. 000240803190.00 Appendix B EXPLORATION PROCEDURES Field Locating of Explorations Exploratory borings were located in the field by pacing distances from on-site landmarks and should be considered approximate. No information was available relative to ground surface elevations at the boring locations. Soil Borings The borings were drilled using conventional rotary wash drilling methods. Soil samples were obtained at selected depths in general accordance with the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) described in ASTM D1586. For this test, a split-barrel sampler is driven into the soil through three increments of 6 inches with blows from a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches. The number of hammer blows required to advance the split barrel sampler through each increment is recorded, and the sum of the final two blow counts is called the "N-value,” with units of blows per foot (bpf). The N values recorded during the sampling process provide an index to the strength and compressibility of the soil. Each borehole was checked for the presence of groundwater after removing the drill tools by lowering a measuring tape down the open borehole. After each measurement, the depth to groundwater, if present, was recorded. Each borehole was backfilled to the ground surface with a combination of spoils and bentonite pellets after making final groundwater measurements. The backfill materials sometimes consolidate after backfilling causing the top of the backfill column to settle and leaving an open hole at the ground surface. Return trips to the site to top-off backfill that has settled were not part of our scope of services. LABORATORY TESTING PROCEDURES The recovered soil samples were classified in the laboratory by a geoprofessional using the USCS as a guide. Samples were tested for the following properties in general accordance with the applicable ASTM standards: • Water content (ASTM D2216) • Grain size (ASTM D1140) The test results are presented on individua logs and summarized on the Laboratory Results Summary or ASTM D1140 - Standard Test Methods for Material in Soils Finer Than No. 200 Sieve sheets in Appendix A. 308 7 Brew Coffee Winter Springs Project № 25124.01.01 September 2025 Traffic Impact Analysis Winter Springs Florida Prepared for: CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. 2600 Northeast 11th Street, Suite 600 Bentonville, AR 72712 Prepared by: 3101 Maguire Boulevard, Suite 265 Orlando, Florida 32803 www.trafficmobility.com (407) 531-5332 309 7 Brew Coffee Winter Springs Traffic Impact Analysis Project № 25124.01.01 Executive Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Project Information Name: 7 Brew Coffee Winter Springs Location: Corner of SR 434 and Michael Blake Boulevard Jurisdiction Winter Springs, Florida Description: 510 Square Feet Coffee Shop with Two (2) Drive-Through Lanes Findings Trip Generation: Roadway Segments: 132 ADT / 32 AM Peak / 10 PM Peak Net New Trips A review of roadway capacity conditions reveals that the proposed development is not projected to adversely impact the roadway network. Intersections: The intersections of SR 434 at Tuskawilla Road and SR 434 at Michael Blake Boulevard currently operate below the adopted LOS on the northbound and southbound approaches and are projected to continue doing so at project buildout. However, these approaches are expected to operate within capacity (V/C < 1). The intersection of SR 434 at Eagle Edge operates at adequate LOS and is projected to operate at adequate LOS. Drive-Through Queue Analysis: The queue analysis for the drive-through lanes demonstrates that there is projected to be adequate accommodation on-site such that project trips should not spill into the nearby off-site travel lanes. 310 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that I am a Professional Engineer properly registered in the State of Florida practicing with Traffic & Mobility Consultants LLC, a corporation authorized to operate as an engineering business, CA-30024, by the State of Florida Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Professional Engineers, and that I have prepared or approved the evaluations, findings, opinions, conclusions, or technical advice attached hereto for: PROJECT: 7 Brew Coffee Winter Springs LOCATION: Winter Springs, Florida CLIENT: CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. I hereby acknowledge that the procedures and references used to develop the results contained in these computations are standard to the professional practice of Transportation Engineering as applied through professional judgment and experience. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN DIGITALLY SIGNED AND SEALED BY ON THE DATE ADJACENT TO THE SEAL PRINTED COPIES OF THIS DOCUMENT ARE NOT CONSIDERED SIGNED AND SEALED AND THE SIGNATURE MUST BE VERIFIED ON ANY ELECTRONIC COPIES. TRAFFIC & MOBILITY CONSULTANTS LLC 988 Woodcock Road, SUITE 200 ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32803 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION CA-30024 CHARLOTTE N. DAVIDSON, P.E. № 50725 Charlotte N Davidson Digitally signed by Charlotte N Davidson Date: 2025.09.10 13:05:13 -04'00' 311 7 Brew Coffee Winter Springs Traffic Impact Analysis Project № 25124.01.01 Table of Contents i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 2.0 PROJECT TRAFFIC ......................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Trip Generation ............................................................................................................. 3 2.2 Trip Distribution ............................................................................................................. 4 3.0 STUDY AREA ................................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Study Roadways ........................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Study Intersections ........................................................................................................ 6 4.0 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS........................................................................... 7 5.0 TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS ................................................................................................ 8 5.1 Projected Roadway Volumes ........................................................................................ 8 5.2 Projected Intersection Volumes ..................................................................................... 8 6.0 CAPACITY ANALYSIS ................................................................................................... 11 6.1 Roadway Segments .................................................................................................... 11 6.2 Intersections ................................................................................................................ 12 7.0 DRIVE-THROUGH QUEUE ANALYSIS ......................................................................... 13 8.0 STUDY CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................ 17 APPENDICES Appendix A Development Site Plan Appendix B Methodology Appendix C Trip Generation Information Appendix D Model Distribution Plots Appendix E Seminole County Roadway Information Appendix F Intersection Traffic Counts & Seasonal Factor Data Appendix G Projected Intersection Volume Calculations Appendix H HCM Analysis Sheets Appendix I Queue Analysis 312 7 Brew Coffee Winter Springs Traffic Impact Analysis Project № 25124.01.01 Table of Contents ii LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Trip Generation Summary .............................................................................................. 3 Table 2 Study Segments .............................................................................................................. 6 Table 3 Study Intersections ......................................................................................................... 6 Table 4 Segment Analysis ......................................................................................................... 11 Table 5 Intersection Analysis ..................................................................................................... 12 Table 6 Maximum Queue for Morning Peak Hours .................................................................... 15 Table 7 Maximum Queue for Afternoon Peak Hours ................................................................. 15 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Site Location Map .......................................................................................................... 2 Figure 2 Project Trip Distribution ................................................................................................. 5 Figure 3 AM Peak Hour Intersection Volumes ............................................................................. 9 Figure 4 PM Peak Hour Intersection Volumes ........................................................................... 10 Figure 5 On-Site Stacking .......................................................................................................... 14 313 7 Brew Coffee Winter Springs Traffic Impact Analysis Project № 25124.01.01 Page 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION This Traffic Impact Analysis was prepared in support of a development application for 7 Brew Coffee Winter Springs. The project is a residential development which consists of 510 square feet coffee shop with two (2) drive-through lanes. The site is located at the corner of SR 434 and Michael Blake Boulevard in Winter Springs, Florida. Figure 1 depicts the site location and the surrounding transportation network. A development plan depicting the site layout and access points is included in Appendix A. The approved traffic methodology for this site is provided in Appendix B for reference. Information used in this analysis includes data collected by Traffic & Mobility Consultants, information provided by the project team, and/or other data and information obtained from Seminole County, the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). 314 SR 4 3 4 K i n g s R o a d SITE Not to Scale N Site Location Map Figure 1 S R 4 1 7 SR 4 3 4 Tu s k a w i l l a R o a d Tu s k a w i l l a R o a d SITEMich a e l B l a k e B o u l e v a r d S R 4 3 4 25124.01.01 7 Brew Coffee Winter Springs 315 7 Brew Coffee Winter Springs Traffic Impact Analysis Project № 25124.01.01 Page 3 2.0 PROJECT TRAFFIC 2.1 Trip Generation The trips generated by the proposed development were projected using data published in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 12th Edition. Trip generation rates and equations published for the land use were applied to the proposed development program to determine the total trips generated by the project. Trip generation equations published for land use were applied to the proposed development program to determine the total trips generated by the project. ITE Code 938 presents pass-by rates for coffee/donut shops with drive-through service and no indoor seating, with observed averages of 90% for the AM and 98% for the PM. Recognizing that these percentages are too high and considering that this site does not include indoor seating (a factor not addressed by ITE for coffee/donut shops), we utilized the pass-by percentages from ITE Code 935, which covers fast food restaurants with drive-through service and no indoor seating, to justify using a lower pass-by rate. ITE Code 935 shows pass-by rates of 31% for the AM and the PM. For the 7 Brew site, conservatively an average of the two land uses was applied, with pass-by rates of 61% for the AM and 65% for the PM. The daily rate is average of the AM and PM rates. The trip generation calculations are summarized in Table 1 and detailed information is included in Appendix C. Table 1 Trip Generation Summary ITE Daily Code Land Use Rate Trips Rate T otal Enter Exit Rate Total Enter Exit 938 Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window and No Indoor Seating 2 179.0 358 179 80 40 40 15.08 30 15 15 226 48 24 24 20 10 10 Net New Trip Generation 132 32 16 16 10 5 5 Trip generation analysis based on ITE Trip Generation Manual, 12th Edition Pass-by estimated based on ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition In the absence of specific calcualtion guidance in the ITE manual, Daily Pass-By trips were assumed to be average of AM and PM Peak Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window and No Indoor Seating Pass-by Trips ( 63% Daily,61% AM, 65% PM) Drive-Thru Lanes AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 316 7 Brew Coffee Winter Springs Traffic Impact Analysis Project № 25124.01.01 Page 4 Per Seminole County TIA guidelines, a study is required when a proposed site generates more that 50 new peak hour trips or for all small high generators (i.e., convenience stores, gasoline stations, fast food restaurants, banks, etc.). Therefore, the development meets the criteria for a traffic impact study. 2.2 Trip Distribution A preliminary trip distribution pattern was developed using the Central Florida Regional Planning Model (CFRPM). The adopted model was modified to include a project specific traffic analysis zone with the corresponding socio-economic data to reflect the proposed development. A select zone analysis was executed to obtain a model-generated trip distribution pattern on the surrounding transportation network. Minor manual adjustments were applied to the model generated distribution pattern to better reflect the local transportation network and prevailing travel patterns. The final trip distribution pattern is illustrated in Figure 2 and the model output plot is included in Appendix D. 317 SR 434 25% Tu s c a w i l l a R o a d 45%SITE Not to Scale N Project Trip Distribution Figure 2 55% SR 4 1 7 20% 10% 15% 30% 25124.01.01 7 Brew Coffee Winter Springs 318 7 Brew Coffee Winter Springs Traffic Impact Analysis Project № 25124.01.01 Page 6 3.0 STUDY AREA 3.1 Study Roadways The study area was established in accordance with the requirements of Seminole County and as agreed to during the traffic methodology coordination with the City of Winter Springs. The study roadway segments are listed in Table 2. The roadway segment information was obtained from the 2022 Seminole County Summary of Roadway Concurrency Information, the relevant excerpts of which are included in Appendix E. Table 2 Study Segments 3.2 Study Intersections The study area encompasses major intersections as defined in the traffic methodology, which consists of three (3) nearby SR 434 intersections. The study intersections are listed in Table 3. Table 3 Study Intersections Count ID Description SR 434 296 Springs Ave to Tuskawilla Rd 297 Tuskawilla Rd to SR 419 Tuskawilla Rd 326 SR 434 to Trotwood Blvd 2022 Seminole County Summary of Roadway Concurrency Information Int Intersection Traffic # Major Road Minor Road Control 1 SR 434 Tuskawilla Rd Signal 2 SR 434 Eagle Edge Ln Two-Way Stop 3 SR 434 Michael Blake Blvd Two-Way Stop 319 7 Brew Coffee Winter Springs Traffic Impact Analysis Project № 25124.01.01 Page 7 4.0 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS Transportation improvement programs published by MetroPlan Orlando and the FDOT Work Program were reviewed to determine if any transportation improvements that influence the project’s study area are planned or programmed. No such improvements were identified. 320 7 Brew Coffee Winter Springs Traffic Impact Analysis Project № 25124.01.01 Page 8 5.0 TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS 5.1 Projected Roadway Volumes Existing roadway information was obtained from the 2022 Seminole County Summary of Roadway Concurrency Information and the 2025 Seminole County Traffic Counts. The information includes roadway segment data, existing traffic volumes, service volumes, adopted LOS standards, capacities, and committed trips. Excerpts of the respective files are included in Appendix E. Projected background traffic was derived from existing traffic and committed trips (E+C) from approved developments published in the 2022 Seminole County Summary of Roadway Concurrency Information. The total projected volumes on the roadway segments include background traffic and project trips, which were calculated based on the project’s trip generation and distribution pattern. 5.2 Projected Intersection Volumes Existing AM and PM peak hour turning movement volumes were obtained at the study intersections on August 26, 2025. The counts were seasonally adjusted using the applicable seasonal factors obtained from the FDOT Traffic Online data. The raw turning movement volumes and supporting information are provided in Appendix F. The committed trips on the adjacent segments were reviewed to evaluate impact to the study intersections. Roadway SR 434 from Springs Avenue to Tuskawilla Road includes 293 committed trips. There are no receiving trips on SR 434 east of Tuaskawilla Road nor on Tuskawilla Road, therefore none of the committed trips were applied to the three (3) study intersections. The total projected intersection volumes include existing traffic and project trips, which were calculated based on the project’s trip generation and assignment at each intersection. Detailed intersection volume calculations are provided in Appendix G and the resulting existing and buildout volumes are illustrated in Figure 3 and Figure 4 for the AM and PM peak hour, respectively. 321 3 2 1 Legend: Existing + [Pass-By] + (Project) = Total 1 Lanes by movement Not to Scale N 25124.01.01 7 Brew Coffee Winter Springs AM Intersection Volumes Figure 3322 3 2 1 1 Lanes by movement Not to Scale N 25124.01.01 7 Brew Coffee Winter Springs PM Intersection Volumes Figure 4 Legend: Existing + [Pass-By] + (Project) = Total 323 7 Brew Coffee Winter Springs Traffic Impact Analysis Project № 25124.01.01 Page 11 6.0 CAPACITY ANALYSIS 6.1 Roadway Segments Roadway segment capacity was analyzed based on the adopted service volume capacity and the corresponding traffic volumes to determine the resulting volume-to-capacity ratios, as summarized in Table 4. Table 4 Segment Analysis The results of the capacity analysis reveal that all roadway segments within the study area currently operate at adequate LOS and are projected to continue to do so at buildout of the development. Count # of Comm ID Description Lns Cap Vol V/C Trips Vol V/C % Dist Trips Vol V/C SR 434 296 Springs Ave to Tuskawilla Rd 4 48,000 29,408 0.61 293 29,701 0.62 55% 73 29,774 0.62 297 Tuskawilla Rd to SR 419 4 48,000 36,655 0.76 0 36,655 0.76 55% 73 36,728 0.77 Tuskawilla Rd 326 SR 434 to Trotwood Blvd 4 42,560 21,458 0.50 0 21,458 0.50 30% 40 21,498 0.51 2022 Seminole County Summary of Roadway Concurrency Information 2025 Seminole County Traffic Counts Online Project BuildoutExistingBackground 324 7 Brew Coffee Winter Springs Traffic Impact Analysis Project № 25124.01.01 Page 12 6.2 Intersections The study intersections were analyzed in accordance with the methods of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) as applied in the Synchro analytical tool. The HCM analysis sheets are provided in Appendix H. The analysis results for existing and buildout conditions are summarized in Table 5, which reveal the following: • The intersections of SR 434 at Tuskawilla Road and SR 434 at Michael Blake Boulevard currently operate below the adopted LOS on the northbound and southbound approaches and are projected to continue doing so at project buildout. However, these approaches are expected to operate within capacity (V/C < 1). • The intersection of SR 434 at Eagle Edge operates at adequate LOS and is projected to operate at adequate LOS. Table 5 Intersection Analysis Int Intersection Time EB WB NB SB Overall # Major Road Minor Road Control Period Scenario Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Existing 42.7 D 40.1 D 81.3 F 99.7 F 51.7 D Buildout 44.3 D 40.8 D 81.5 F 101.3 F 53.0 D Existing 61.6 E 38.9 D 106.8 F 122.0 F 66.2 E Buildout 63.5 E 40.4 D 106.3 F 122.6 F 67.6 E Existing -- -- -- -- -- --16.3 C -- -- Buildout -- -- -- -- -- --16.6 C -- -- Existing -- -- -- -- -- --17.3 C -- -- Buildout -- -- -- -- -- --17.4 C -- -- Existing 4.7 A 43.5 D 102.6 F 109.1 F 35.0 D Buildout 5.2 A 43.5 D 102.6 F 120.0 F 36.8 D Existing 5.2 A 53.0 D 118.1 F 112.9 F 34.7 C Buildout 5.5 A 53.0 D 118.1 F 113.9 F 35.1 D Average delay expressed in seconds/vehicle 1 2 SR 434 TWSC AM PM PM SR 434 Signal AM Tuskawilla Road Eagle Edge Lane 3 SR 434 Signal AM PM Michael Blake Boulevard 325 7 Brew Coffee Winter Springs Traffic Impact Analysis Project № 25124.01.01 Page 13 7.0 DRIVE-THROUGH QUEUE ANALYSIS The site plan depicts one (1) access into the project site. Entrance into the two (2) drive-thru lanes are immediately entered upon arrival. The inner lane has a total length of 170 feet. Assuming the queue length of one (1) car to be 20 feet, the inner lane can accommodate approximately eight (8) cars. The outer lane has a total length of 225 feet. Assuming the queue length of one (1) car to be 20 feet, the outer lane can accommodate approximately 11 cars. Thus, the total queue capacity for the 7 Brews Coffee Winter Springs drive-through lanes is 19 vehicles. The site plan and queue lengths are depicted in Figure 5. For the queue analysis, data from a similar study conducted for a coffee shop with a drive-through of a comparable type was referenced. This study gathered data from three (3) similar sites in Miami, Florida, to assess potential queuing. The sites studied were: • Site 1: Dunkin' Donuts at 10880 Biscayne Boulevard • Site 2: Starbucks at 12000 Biscayne Boulevard • Site 3: Starbucks at 13503 Biscayne Boulevard Six (6) field visits were performed to collect queue data at these three (3) sites during AM and PM peak periods. Data was collected from 7 AM to 9 AM for the AM peak period and from 4 PM to 6 PM for the PM peak period. The observed maximum queues during these peak hours were as follows: • Site 1: 10 vehicles (AM), 3 vehicles (PM) • Site 2: 10 vehicles (AM), 5 vehicles (PM) • Site 3: 8 vehicles (AM), 6 vehicles (PM) The observed queues for the three (3) surrogate sites during AM and PM peak hours are included in Appendix I along with excerpts from the study. 326 225 ’ 170 ’ Legend: In Queue Exiting Site Not to Scale N Driveway Circulation Figure 525124.02.01 7 Brew Coffee Winter Springs 327 7 Brew Coffee Winter Springs Traffic Impact Analysis Project № 25124.01.01 Page 15 The maximum queued vehicle per trip generated observed at the three (3) similar sites was found to be 0.10 for the AM peak hour and 0.132 for the PM peak hour. The maximum queue calculations for 7 Brew Coffee Winter Springs during the AM and PM peak hours are shown in Table 6 and Table 7, respectively. The results indicate that the maximum queue at the 7 Brews is projected to be eight (8) (e.g., 0.10 x 80) vehicles during AM peak hours and four (4) (e.g., 0.132 x 30) vehicles during PM peak hours. Table 6 Maximum Queue for Morning Peak Hours Table 7 Maximum Queue for Afternoon Peak Hours 7 AM to 8 AM 8 AM to 9 AM 7 AM to 8 AM 8 AM to 9 AM 7 AM to 8 AM 8 AM to 9 AM Vehicle/hr (V)100 109 80 115 89 80 Maximum Queue (Q)9 10 6 10 8 8 Q/V 0.09 0.092 0.075 0.087 0.09 0.1 Maximum Q/V Starbucks at Westside Trips Starbucks at Westside Maximum Q/V 8.0 0.10 80 Site 1 Site 2 Site 3 = 8 4 PM to 5 PM 5 PM to 6 PM 4 PM to 5 PM 5 PM to 6 PM 4 PM to 5 PM 5 PM to 6 PM Vehicle/hr (V)28 24 32 38 50 59 Maximum Queue (Q)3 3 4 5 5 6 Q/V 0.107 0.125 0.125 0.132 0.10 0.1 Maximum Q/V Starbucks at Westside Trips Starbucks at Westside Maximum Q/V 0.132 30 3.9 = 4 Site 1 Site 2 Site 3 328 7 Brew Coffee Winter Springs Traffic Impact Analysis Project № 25124.01.01 Page 16 As discussed previously, the site plan for the proposed 7 Brew site includes a vehicular access storage capacity of approximately nineteen (19) vehicles without impacting exit access, cross access easement, and parking spaces, as shown in Figure 5. Based on the analysis of similar sites, the maximum projected queue at the proposed 7 Brews during the AM peak hour is estimated to be eight (8) vehicles. This storage capacity exceeds the queues derived based on comparable locations. The analysis indicates that the proposed 7 Brew has more than enough capacity to accommodate the projected vehicular demand, ensuring that queuing does not spill into the cross-access easement driveway or outside the site’s entrances. 329 7 Brew Coffee Winter Springs Traffic Impact Analysis Project № 25124.01.01 Page 17 8.0 STUDY CONCLUSIONS This Traffic Impact Analysis was conducted to evaluate the impacts of the 7 Brew Coffee Winter Springs project which consists of 510 square feet Coffee Shop with two (2) drive-through lanes. The site is located at the corner of SR 434 and Michael Blake Boulevard in Seminole County, Florida. The analysis included determination of trip generation, review of transportation capacity and operations, and evaluation of queue analysis for the drive-though. The results of the traffic analysis are summarized as follows: Summary of Findings  The proposed development is projected to generate 132 net new daily trips, of which 32 trips occur during the AM peak hour and 10 trips occur during the PM peak hour.  A review of roadway capacity conditions reveals that the proposed development is not projected to adversely impact the study roadway segments.  The intersections of SR 434 at Tuskawilla Road and SR 434 at Michael Blake Boulevard currently operate below the adopted LOS on the northbound and southbound approaches and are projected to continue doing so at project buildout. However, these approaches are expected to operate within capacity (V/C < 1).  The intersection of SR 434 at Eagle Edge operates at adequate LOS and is projected to operate at adequate LOS.  The queue analysis for the drive-through lanes demonstrates that there is projected to be adequate accommodation on-site such that project trips should not spill into the nearby travel off-site lanes. 330 APPENDICES 331 Appendix A Development Site Plan 332 Semi n o l e C o . A e r i a l T r u c k S D W W W W W W W W S E A H A W K C O V E - 6 2 ' R O W W W W W W W W W * * 700 36.87 ND TPNDSSMC.ADJ 701 34.98 ND TPNDSSMC.ADJ 35.6 36 . 7 2 37.4 FLO R I D A T R A I L ACQ U I S I T I O N P A R C E L B ( R A I L S T O T R A I L S C O R R I D O R ) S T A T E R O A D 4 3 4 R I G H T O F W A Y V A R I E S F L O R I D A D E P A R T M E N T O F T R A N S P O R T A T I O N R I G H T O F W A Y M A P S E C T I O N 7 7 0 7 0 - 2 5 1 6 2" PVC STUB UP 5' FROM GROUND PAINTED GREEN FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD LB 8246 FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD ILLEGIBLE FOUND NAIL & DISC CPH LB 7143 HANDRAIL P O S T F O R O L D W I R E F E N C E ( T Y P I C A L ) VACANT NO IMPROVEMENT EXCEPT AS SHOWN SITE BENCHMARK SET NAIL & DISK "SSMC TRAV. PT." ELEVATION=34.98 SITE BENCHMARK SET NAIL & DISK "SSMC TRAV. PT." ELEVATION=36.87 C O N C R E T E W A L K E D G E O F P A V E M E N T N50 ° 3 7 ' 2 5 " E 1 7 0 . 6 7 ' N 3 9 ° 4 3 ' 4 3 " W 1 2 7 . 6 1 ' S50 ° 3 7 ' 2 8 " W 1 7 0 . 1 2 ' S 3 9 ° 2 8 ' 5 6 " E 1 2 7 . 6 1 ' N O R T H E A S T E R L Y R I G H T O F W A Y L I N E ( B E A R I N G B A S I S ) 2 " C U R B & G U T T E R N O R T H E A S T E R L Y R I G H T O F W A Y L I N E N O R T H E A S T E R L Y R I G H T O F W A Y L I N E U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T O R B 7 4 8 6 , P A G E 1 5 5 A PORTION OF PARCEL 1 LOT 8, BLOCK A D.R. MITCHELL'S SURVEY OF THE LEVY GRANT PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 5 PARCEL ID: 26-20-30-5AR-0A00-007L REMAINDER OF PARCEL 1 LOT 8, BLOCK A D.R. MITCHELL'S SURVEY OF THE LEVY GRANT PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 5 PARCEL ID: 26-20-30-5AR-0A00-007L TUSKAWILLA RETAIL PARTNERS II LLC REMAINDER OF PARCEL 1 LOT 8, BLOCK A D.R. MITCHELL'S SURVEY OF THE LEVY GRANT PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 5 PARCEL ID: 26-20-30-5AR-0A00-007L TUSKAWILLA RETAIL PARTNERS II LLC N24°10'06"W (D) N51 ° 3 6 ' 2 6 " E 94 . 9 4 ' ( D ) 3 6 . 9 1 ' NORT H W E S T E R L Y L I N E O F A C Q U I S I T I O N P A R C E L B N25°10'29"W 48.66' N 3 8 ° 4 3 ' 1 6 " W 3 5 7 . 6 5 ' ( D ) REMAINDER OF PARCEL 1 LOT 8, BLOCK A D.R. MITCHELL'S SURVEY OF THE LEVY GRANT PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 5 PARCEL ID: 26-20-30-5AR-0A00-007L TUSKAWILLA RETAIL PARTNERS II LLC 3 5 7 . 6 5 ' 3 4 . 3 8 3 6 . 4 6 3 7 . 0 0 3 7 . 5 0 3 7 . 9 6 S V S T E S T 25.1 1 25.0 6 25.7 8 25.6 8 3 4 . 4 7 3 4 . 0 6 3 6 . 4 9 3 6 . 1 4 3 5 . 8 9 3 6 . 8 0 3 7 . 1 3 3 7 . 1 3 37.1 1 3 5 . 9 7 3 6 . 7 9 3 7 . 4 2 3 7 . 6 2 3 7 . 9 8 3 8 . 1 4 3 7 . 4 0 3 7 . 8 8 3 6 . 7 0 3 7 . 1 5 3 7 . 1 9 3 7 . 0 4 3 7 . 6 4 3 7 . 7 0 3 7 . 4 8 3 8 . 1 4 L 1 1 5 ' U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T ( O . R . B . 7 4 8 6 , P G . 1 5 5 ) N 51 ° 3 6 ' 2 6 " E 9 4 . 9 4 ' ( D ) O.R.B. 7486, PG. 155 15' UTILITY EASEMENT S O U T H E A S T E R L Y R / W L I N E M I C H A E L B L A K E B L V D . 2 4 6 . 6 0 ' N 3 9 ° 4 3 ' 3 9 " W 3 5 7 . 6 5 ' ( M ) N 3 8 ° 4 3 ' 1 6 " W 3 5 7 . 6 5 ' ( D ) N 2 4 ° 1 0 ' 0 6 " W 4 8 . 6 6 ' N 3 8 ° 4 3 ' 1 6 " W P O B 6 VAN ST O P ST O P LA N E 2 LA N E 1 DO NO T E N T E R 2 5 ' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 5' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 5' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 1 5 ' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K FFE = 3 4 . 7 0 FFE = 3 4 . 7 0 ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO 7-BREW DEVELOPMENT. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL NECESSARY CONSTRUCTION ITEMS AS NEEDED. ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO 7-BREW DEVELOPMENT. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL NECESSARY CONSTRUCTION ITEMS AS NEEDED. ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO 7-BREW DEVELOPMENT. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL NECESSARY CONSTRUCTION ITEMS AS NEEDED. STOP 1 4 ' 9' 1 8 ' 21' TYP 9' TY P 16 ' 13.50' 2 6 ' 14.4 3 ' 25' 59.5 9 ' 63.1 5 ' 5 2 . 4 2 ' 5 2 . 4 2 ' 4 3 . 3 3 ' 4 3 . 3 3 ' 2 ' 1 2 . 5 ' 1 7 . 1 4 ' 1 2 . 5 ' 2 ' 1 2 . 5 ' 1 8 ' T Y P 5 . 7 8 ' 5 ' 9' 36.7 4 ' 23.1 3 ' 12.5 ' 2' 12.5 ' 20.2 4 ' 14' 2.59 ' 36.8 7 ' 25' 8 . 7 6 ' 5 . 5 7 ' 1 0 . 5 ' 1 6 . 8 6 ' TYP TYP TYP TYP TYP TYP TYP 72A 72A 72A 72A 72A 09A 09U 09D 09S 08B 72B 02E 03A 11A 01B 01B 70D TRUCK DELIVERY AREA. R15' R15' R10' R15' R15' R15' R15' R31' R29' R27.5' R29.5' R42' R42' R43' R10' 12F 12G 10B EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT INSTALLED BY OVERALL DEVELOPER FIRE HYDRANT APPROX. 115 LF FROM 7BREW BUILDING 03N 72C CEI PROJECT NUMBER DATE PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD PROJECT MANAGER DESIGNER REVISION SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE CEI ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. REVISION NO.DESCRIPTION DATE C2.0 SITE PLAN REV-1 7/24/2025 34335 BWB EVD TAB DR A W I N G L O C A T I O N - P: \ 3 4 0 0 0 \ 3 4 3 3 5 . 0 \ D R A W I N G S \ D E S I G N \ W O R K I N G \ 3 4 3 3 5 - S P . D W G - - S A V E D B Y - AM C D A N I E L © 2025 CEI ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. FAX: (479) 273-0844 PHONE: (479) 273-9472 BENTONVILLE, AR 72712 2600 NE 11TH ST, SUITE 300 WI N T E R S P R I N G S , FL O R I D A MI C H A E L B L A K E B L V D SE V E N B R E W PARKING TABLE SPACES REQUIRED SPACES PROVIDED STANDARD CAR PARKING NO PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENTS 6 SPACES ACCESSIBLE PARKING 1 SPACE 1 SPACE TOTAL CAR PARKING NO PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENTS 7 SPACES ACREAGE SUMMARY TABLE PARCEL ± 21,744 SF (0.50 AC) PERVIOUS AREA ± 7,308 SF (0.17AC) IMPERVIOUS AREA ± 14,436 SF (0.33 AC) SITE INFORMATION ZONING T-5: URBAN CENTER ZONE BUILDING FOOTPRINT 510 SF BUILDING HEIGHT 19' SETBACKS NORTH 25' BUILDING SOUTH 15' BUILDING EAST 5' BUILDING WEST 5' BUILDING PROPOSED LEGEND GENERAL SITE NOTES A.ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. B.ALL CURB RETURN RADII SHALL BE 3', AS SHOWN TYPICAL ON THIS PLAN, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. C.UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN, CALLED OUT OR SPECIFIED HEREON OR WITHIN THE SPECIFICATIONS: ALL CURB AND GUTTER ADJACENT TO ASPHALT PAVING SHALL BE INSTALLED PER DETAIL 01A. ALL CURBING ADJACENT TO CONCRETE PAVING SHALL BE INSTALLED PER DETAIL 01B. D.ALL PARKING LOT SIGN BASE SUPPORTS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER DETAIL 12F. E.ALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS SHALL HAVE SIGNAGE INSTALLED PER DETAIL 09S. F.PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION IN RIGHT-OF-WAY, CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL TRAFFIC CONTROL IN ACCORDANCE WITH MUTCD. PROPERTY LINE/RIGHT OF WAY LINE CURB INLET BUILDING CONTROL POINT PROPOSED PARKING SPACES LIMITS OF SIDEWALKS AND CONCRETE APRONS (PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. SEE DETAIL PAVING PLAN # ADJACENT ZONING INFORMATION NORTH T-5: URBAN CENTER ZONE SOUTH T-5: URBAN CENTER ZONE EAST T-5: URBAN CENTER ZONE WEST T-5: URBAN CENTER ZONE LEGEND VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE SITE MICH A E L B L A K E B O U L E V A R D T R E E S W A L L O W D R . E A S T F L O R I D A 4 3 4 EXISTING LEGEND -**- = SOUTHEASTERN SURVEYING & MAPPING CORPORATION D S = SET 5/8" IRON ROD SSMC LB 2108 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED = CONCRETE MONUMENT = DRAINAGE MANHOLE = HAND HOLE = NAIL W/DISC = POST/BOLLARD = SEWER VALVE = TRAFFIC SIGN ABBREVIATION LEGEND: = DEED/DESCRIPTION DATA(D) L R Δ CH CB PRM ALTA NSPS ORB PG(S) LB PSM ID TRAV.PT. SSMC = TRAVERSE POINT = IDENTIFICATION = PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER = LICENSED BUSINESS = PAGE(S) = OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK = NATIONAL SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEY = AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION = PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT = CHORD BEARING = CHORD = DELTA = RADIUS = LENGTH SYMBOL LEGEND: HATCHING LEGEND: = CURB & GUTTER = CONCRETE LINETYPE LEGEND: = WIRE FENCE SITE BENCHMARK BEARINGS SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHTO OF WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD 434 AS SHOWN ON THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPROTATION RIGHT OF WAY MAP SECTION 77070-2516, BEING NORTH 39°43'43" WEST. SITE BENCHMARK 1 SET NAIL & DISK "SSMC TRAV. PT." ELEVATION=36.87 SITE BENCHMARK 2 SET NAIL & DISK "SSMC TRAV. PT." ELEVATION=34.98 NOTE: SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF PORCHES, RAMPS, VESTIBULE, SLOPED PAVING, TRUCK DOCKS, BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS AND PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS.Know what's below. before you dig.Call 0 20'30'40' SCALE IN FEET SITE DETAILS 01A TYPE A CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 02A PRECAST CONCRETE WHEEL STOP 03A WHEELCHAIR RAMP IN SIDEWALK 03N WHEELCHAIR RAMP IN SIDEWALK (TYPICAL AT EACH DRIVEWAY CURB RETURN) 09A SIXTY DEGREE PARKING SPACE STRIPING 09D 60 DEGREE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE STRIPING 09S ACCESSIBLE / VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN 09U ACCESSIBLE PARKING SYMBOL 10A TRAFFIC FLOW ARROW 10B STOP BAR 11A DO NOT ENTER SIGN 12F SIGN BASE 12G STOP SIGN 70D BIKE RACK 72A FDOT DETAIL "CURB AND GUTTER" "TYPE F" 72B FDOT DETAIL 711-001. "PAVEMENT MARKINGS" "THROUGH LANE USE ARROW" 72C FDOT DETAIL 711-001. "SPECIAL EMPHASIS CROSSWALK DETAIL" SITE NOTES 02E TRASH DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE (PER ARCH. PLANS). 08B OVERHEAD CANOPY - (TYP.-PER ARCH. PLANS). GRATE INLET A.FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS ROADS PROVIDED AT THE START OF A PROJECT AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. (NFPA 1, 16.14). B.A SECOND ENTRANCE/EXIT MIGHT BE REQUIRED PER AHJ IF THE RESPONSE TIME FOR EMERGENCY IS EXCEEDED PER NFPA 1, SECTION 18.2.3.3 MULTIPLE ACCESS ROADS. C.WATER SUPPLY FOR FIRE PROTECTION, EITHER TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT, SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE AS SOON AS COMBUSTIBLE MATERIAL ACCUMULATES. THIS APPLIES TO BOTH COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS. (NFPA 1, 16.5.3.1). D.WHERE UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS AND HYDRANTS ARE TO BE PROVIDED, THEY SHALL BE INSTALLED, COMPLETED, AND IN SERVICE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION WORK. (NFPA 1, 16.4.3.1.3). E.FIRE FLOW TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 291, RECOMMENDED PRACTICE FOR FIRE FLOW TESTING. F.A 36 IN. CLEAR SPACE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AROUND THE CIRCUMFERENCE OF FIRE HYDRANTS AND A CLEAR SPACE OF NOT LESS THAN 60 IN. (1524 MM) SHALL BE PROVIDED IN FRONT OF EACH HYDRANT CONNECTION HAVING A DIAMETER GREATER THAN 21⁄2 IN. NFPA 1, 18.5.7. G.HYDRANT SHALL BE MARKED WITH A BLUE REFLECTOR THAT IS PLACED 6'' IN THE ROADWAY IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 1, CHAPTER 18.5.10. H.ACCESS TO GATED SUBDIVISIONS OR DEVELOPMENTS SHALL PROVIDE FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS THROUGH AN APPROVED SOS AND SEMINOLE COUNTY KNOX KEY SWITCH. NFPA 1, 18.2.2.2. NOTE: REQUIRED FIRE FLOW PER NFPA 1 CHAPTER 18 50 PSI. 333 Appendix B Methodology 334 3101 Maguire Boulevard, Suite 265, Orlando, Florida 32803 ■ P: (407) 531-5332 ■ F: (407) 531-5331 ■ www.trafficmobility.com MEMORANDUM August 11, 2025 Re: 7 Brew Coffee Traffic Impact Analysis Methodology City of Winter Springs, Florida Project № 25124.01.01 The following methodology outlines the proposed Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the above- mentioned project. This methodology is consistent with the requirements and guidelines of Seminole County for TIA’s. Project Description The site consists of a proposed 510 square feet coffee shop with two (2) drive through lanes and no indoor seating. A preliminary conceptual site plan is included in the Attachments. Project Location The site is located at the northeast corner of SR 434 and Michael Blake Boulevard in the City of Winter Springs, Florida, as shown in Figure 1. Project Access Access to the site is proposed via two (2) driveways on Tree Swallow Drive: one ingress-only driveway and one egress-only driveway. Tree Swallow Drive connects to SR 434 through Michael Blake Boulevard, as shown in the preliminary conceptual plan. 335 SITE Not to Scale N 25124.01.01 7 Brew Coffee Site Location Map Figure 1 SITE 336 7 Brew Coffee Traffic Impact Analysis Methodology Project № 25124.01.01 August 11, 2025 Page 3 of 5 Table 1 Trip Generation Analysis Trip generation equations published for land use were applied to the proposed development program to determine the total trips generated by the project. ITE Code 938 presents pass-by rates for coffee/donut shops with drive-through service and no indoor seating, with observed averages of 90% for the AM and 98% for the PM. Recognizing that these percentages are too high and considering that this site does not include indoor seating (a factor not addressed by ITE for coffee/donut shops), we utilized the pass-by percentages from ITE Code 935, which covers fast food restaurants with drive-through service and no indoor seating, to justify using a lower pass-by rate. ITE Code 935 shows pass-by rates of 31% for the AM and the PM. For the 7 Brew site, we conservatively used an average of the two land uses, with pass-by rates of 61% for the AM and 65% for the PM. For the daily rate, an average of the AM and PM rates (63%) is used. The trip generation calculations are summarized in Table 1 and detailed information is included in Attachments. The proposed development is projected to generate 134 daily trips, of which 32 trips occur during the AM peak hour, and 10 trips occur during the PM peak hour. Trip Distribution The trip distribution pattern was estimated using the Central Florida Regional Planning Model (CFRPMv7). The model distribution was manually adjusted to account for interacting local activity centers and to reflect the local network, as well as prevailing traffic flow patterns. The raw model output is included in the Attachments and the adjusted general distribution is shown in Figure 2. Study Area The project is located within the Transportation Concurrency Exception Areas/Dense Urban Land Areas (TCEAs/DULAs) designated area by Seminole County; therefore, based on the thresholds listed on the County’s Summary of Traffic Study Requirements for Site Impact Analysis (projects in the TCEAs/DULAs), the intersections that fall within ¼-mile radius of influence and the roadway segments that fall within a 1-mile radius will be analyzed. ITE Daily Code Land Use Drive-Through Rate Trips Rate Total Enter Exit Rate Total Enter Exit 938 Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive- Through Window and No Indoor 2 Lanes 179.00 358 39.81 80 40 40 15.08 30 15 15 224 48 24 24 20 10 10 Net New Trip Generation 134 32 16 16 10 5 5 Trip generation analysis based on ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition Pass-by estimated based on ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition In the absence of specific calcualtion guidance in the ITE manual, Daily Pass-By trips were assumed to be average of AM and PM Peak AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window and No Indoor Seating Pass-by Trips ( 63% Daily,61% AM, & 65% PM) 337 SR 434 5% 25% 45%SITE Not to Scale N Project Trip Distribution Figure 2 55% 20% 10% 15% 30% 25124.01.01 7 Brew Coffee 338 7 Brew Coffee Traffic Impact Analysis Methodology Project № 25124.01.01 August 11, 2025 Page 5 of 5 The following roadway segments and intersections will be included in the TIA: Study Segments (1-mile radius):  SR 434 o (296) - Springs Avenue to Tuskawilla Road o (297) - Tuskawilla Road to SR 419  Tuskawilla Road o (326) - SR 434 to Trotwood Boulevard Study Intersections (¼-mile radius):  SR 434 and Tuskawilla Road (Signalized)  SR 434 and Eagle Edge Lane (Unsignalized)  SR 434 and Michael Blake Boulevard (Signalized) Capacity Analysis Roadway segment capacity will be analyzed for existing and buildout daily traffic volumes for the additional new trips generated by the development in addition to the committed trips obtained from the Seminole County Summary of Roadway Concurrency Information, dated December 12, 2022, included in the Attachments. Additionally, TMC will coordinate with City and County staff to include the applicable committed trips for recently approved surrounding developments not listed in the County’s database, if applicable. The study intersections will be analyzed for the AM and PM peak hour conditions using the methods of Synchro. The analysis will be performed for existing and buildout traffic conditions using the new trips at the study intersections and access driveways, in addition to the committed trips from the County’s database and the developments not included in the database. Report A TIA report will be prepared outlining and summarizing the methods and findings of the traffic analysis prepared for the development. 339 Appendix C Trip Generation Information 340 Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window and No Indoor Seating (938) Vehicle Trip Ends vs:Drive-Through Lanes On a:Weekday Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies:8 Avg. Num. of Drive-Through Lanes:1 Directional Distribution:50% entering, 50% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Drive-Through Lane Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 179.00 80.00 - 293.00 74.48 Data Plot and Equation T = Tri p E n d s X = Number of Drive-Through Lanes Study Site Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= **** Trip Gen Manual,12th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.00 100 200 300 400 500 600 2 358 341 Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window and No Indoor Seating (938) Vehicle Trip Ends vs:Drive-Through Lanes On a:Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies:20 Avg. Num. of Drive-Through Lanes:1 Directional Distribution:50% entering, 50% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Drive-Through Lane Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 39.81 16.00 - 69.00 15.44 Data Plot and Equation T = Tri p E n d s X = Number of Drive-Through Lanes Study Site Average RateFitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 53.21(X) - 17.43 R²= 0.58 Trip Gen Manual,12th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.00 50 100 150 200 2 80 89 342 Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window and No Indoor Seating (938) Vehicle Trip Ends vs:Drive-Through Lanes On a:Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies:8 Avg. Num. of Drive-Through Lanes:2 Directional Distribution:50% entering, 50% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Drive-Through Lane Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 15.08 2.50 - 55.00 19.41 Data Plot and Equation T = Tri p E n d s X = Number of Drive-Through Lanes Study Site Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= **** Trip Gen Manual,12th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.00 50 100 150 200 2 30 343 Land Use Code Land Use Setting Time Period # Data Sites Average Pass‐By Rate Drive‐Through Lanes Primary (%) Diverted (%) Total (%) Source 1 Washington 1997 — 100 — — 0 — 18 1 Oregon 1998 — 95 — — 5 — 18 Weekday PM Peak Period 2 98% Pass‐By Characteristics for Individual Sites State or  Province Survey  Year # Interviews Pass‐By  Trip (%) Non‐Pass‐By Trips Adj Street Peak  Hour Volume General Urban/Suburban Vehicle Pass‐By Rates by Land Use Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual , 11th Edition 938 Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive‐Through Window and No Indoor Seating 34 4 Land Use Code Land Use Setting Time Period # Data Sites Average Pass‐By Rate Drive‐Through Lanes Primary (%) Diverted (%) Total (%) Source 1 Washington 1997 — 83 — — 17 — 18 1 Oregon 1998 — 95 — — 5 — 18 1 Washington 1998 — 92 — — 8 — 18 Weekday AM Peak Period 3 90% Pass‐By Characteristics for Individual Sites State or  Province Survey  Year # Interviews Pass‐By  Trip (%) Non‐Pass‐By Trips Adj Street Peak  Hour Volume General Urban/Suburban Vehicle Pass‐By Rates by Land Use Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual , 11th Edition 938 Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive‐Through Window and No Indoor Seating 34 5 Land Use Code Land Use Setting Time Period # Data Sites Average Pass-By Rate Drive-Through Lanes Primary (%)Diverted (%)Total (%)Source 1 Indiana 1993 —29 36 35 71 —34 1 Kentucky 1993 —33 50 17 67 —34 Weekday PM Peak Period 2 31% Pass-By Characteristics for Individual Sites State or Province Survey Year # Interviews Pass-By Trip (%) Non-Pass-By Trips Adj Street Peak Hour Volume General Urban/Suburban Vehicle Pass-By Rates by Land Use Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual , 11th Edition 935 Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window and No Indoor Seating 346 Appendix D Model Distribution Plots 347 (Licensed to Traffic & Mobility Consultants, LLC) T:\AProjectFiles\2025\25124-01 7 Brew Coffee - WS\Methodology\Models\SETUL_SL_NET\HWYLOAD_SL_AllDay_A25_Balanced.net Project Distribution 25124 7 Brew Coffee, Winter Springs, FL = 7676 Nodes TAZs Puffin Big Box Retail North 0 0.5 1 1.5 Miles 1 Lane per Direction 2 Lanes per Direction 3 Lanes per Direction 4+ Lanes per Direction Centroid Connector 0.8 7 1.3 0. 8 7 0 . 8 7 0 .8 7 1. 3 1.7 3 1 . 3 100 5 . 1 9 S R 4 1 7 5.63 CR 419 2.6 4.33 0.87 0.87 3.03 2 .6 1. 3 0.87 3. 4 6 1 . 3 6.93 1 4 . 2 9 2 .6 3 .9 4. 3 3 1 . 3 1.3 5.63 1. 3 5. 6 3 1.3 1.3 Dodd Rd 1 . 3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1 6 .0 2SR 4 3 4 2 5 .5 4 S R 4 3 4 8.23 2. 6 0.87 19.48 2.6 23.38 2.6 3.46 2.6US 17/92 2.6 26.41 2 5.9 7 S R 4 3 4 52. 3 8 5.63CR 419 5.63 3.9 1 .3 7.36 2.6 3.03 Florida Ave 2.6 2.6 2.6 2 .6 0.87 3 . 4 6 6 . 9 3 1.73 SR 417 7. 3 6 SR 417 6.93 SR 417 2.16SR 417 6.0 6SR 417 1.7 3 S R 4 1 7 6.06 4 . 3 3 S R 4 1 7 6.49 SR 417 3 . 4 6 S R 4 1 7 6.49 SR 417 0.87 6.0 6 5.19 SR 417 2 . 1 6 S R 4 1 7 1.73 SR 417 5.19 SR 417 7 . 3 6 1.73SR 417 6.06 1 . 3 1 . 7 3 S R 4 1 7 1.3 4 . 3 3 3.4 6 3 .9 2.6 SR 434 3. 0 3 3.03 SR 434 2.6 2.6 3.9 3.9 CR 419 2.62 . 6 13 . 4 2 SR 434 4.76 47. 6 2 46.32 SR 434 19.48 0 . 8 7 25.97 SR 434 7 . 3 6 S R 4 1 9 7.36 7 . 3 6 1.3 0 . 8 7 0.87 1.3 Lake M ary Blvd 5 . 1 9 S R 4 1 7 348 Appendix E Seminole County Roadway Information 349 Summary of Roadway Concurrency Information Thursday, December 22, 2022 Page 87 of 146 This information has been provided by Tony Nelson, P.E. at Seminole County Engineering and is current information as of the above referenced date. Traffic Counter ID Roadway Name From To __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Net Available Capacity -1617 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 294 SR 434 DeLeon St E-W Expressway Current Traffic Count 23955 Roadway Link Capacity 18270 Committed Trips 293 Net Available Capacity -5978 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 295 SR 434 E-W Expressway Springs Ave Current Traffic Count 27563 Roadway Link Capacity 48000 Committed Trips 0 Net Available Capacity 20437 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 296 SR 434 Springs Ave Tuskawilla Rd Current Traffic Count 27610 Roadway Link Capacity 48000 Committed Trips 293 Net Available Capacity 20097 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 350 Summary of Roadway Concurrency Information Thursday, December 22, 2022 Page 88 of 146 This information has been provided by Tony Nelson, P.E. at Seminole County Engineering and is current information as of the above referenced date. Traffic Counter ID Roadway Name From To __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 297 SR 434 Tuskawilla Rd SR 419 Current Traffic Count 36344 Roadway Link Capacity 48000 Committed Trips 0 Net Available Capacity 11656 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 298 SR 434 SR 419 Belle Ave Current Traffic Count 24671 Roadway Link Capacity 48000 Committed Trips 0 Net Available Capacity 23329 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 299 SR 434 Belle Ave US 17-92 Current Traffic Count 33165 Roadway Link Capacity 48000 Committed Trips 0 Net Available Capacity 14835 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 300 SR 434 US 17-92 CR 427 Current Traffic Count 23146 351 Summary of Roadway Concurrency Information Thursday, December 22, 2022 Page 96 of 146 This information has been provided by Tony Nelson, P.E. at Seminole County Engineering and is current information as of the above referenced date. Traffic Counter ID Roadway Name From To __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Net Available Capacity 15958 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 325 TRIPLET LAKE US 17-92 N. Triplet Lake Dr Current Traffic Count 2483 Roadway Link Capacity 19360 Committed Trips 0 Net Available Capacity 16877 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 326 TUSKAWILLA RD SR 434 Trotwood Blvd Current Traffic Count 21241 Roadway Link Capacity 42560 Committed Trips 0 Net Available Capacity 21319 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 327 TUSKAWILLA RD Trotwood Blvd Winter Springs Blvd Current Traffic Count 20748 Roadway Link Capacity 42560 Committed Trips 8 Net Available Capacity 21804 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 352 Vision 2020 Comprehensive Plan Seminole County, Florida TRANSPORTATION TRA Exhibit-14 traelmex.doc- Last saved: 9/6/01 Generalized Maximum Service Volumes for County Arterial and Collector Roadways Urban Arterial and Collector Roadways - Interim (5-Year) LOS 2 - Lane 4 - Lane * 6 - Lane * A 13,640 ----------- ---------- B 14,620 19,150 28,730 C 15,530 25,540 38,310 D 17,800 32,320 48,520 E 19,360 42,560 63,840 * Based on standards developed for the Impact Fee Study. Rural Arterial and Collector Roadways - Interim (5-Year) LOS 2 - Lane 4 - Lane * 6 - Lane * A 2,250 15,675 23,510 B 5,250 23,750 35,625 C 9,000 30,875 46,310 D 15,000 38,000 57,000 E 20,000 47,500 71,250 * Based on standards from the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual. All Arterial and Collector Roadways - Long Range (20-Year) LOS 2 - Lane 4 - Lane * 6 - Lane * A 9,960 ----------- ---------- B10,670 19,150 28,730 C11,340 25,540 38,310 D13,050 32,320 48,520 E19,360 42,560 63,840 * All values were developed for the Impact Fee Study which addresses long range plan. For interim and long range planning applications and development impact evaluations of State highways, the Florida Department of Transportation Level of Service Criteria will be utilized. Values above do not evaluate side road LOS which is usually LOS E or worse and does not account for any future interruption of traffic flow (I.e. traffic signals). All LOS values are based on peak hour Travel Time Delay Study results. For the evaluation of existing and near tearm traffic conditions, the County has used: (1) Travel Time Delay Studies for 22 County roadway segments; and (2) the five year maximum service volume table for roadways which were not evaluated using Travel Time For interim (5-year) planning applications and development impact evaluations of County roadways, the County Urban and Rural Generalized Maximum Service Volumes will be utilized where more specific analysis is not available. Traffic operation model and o For long range (20-year) planning applications and development impact evaluations of County roadways, the County Generalized Maximum Service Volumes - Long Range (20-Year) will be utilized. 353 354 355 356 Appendix F Intersection Traffic Counts & Seasonal Factor Data 357 TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT ANALYSIS AUTOS & TRUCKS Intersection (N/S): Tuskawilla Road Intersection (E/W): SR 434 Date: 8/26/2025 Tuskawilla Road Tuskawilla Road SR 434 SR 434 NB SB EB WB Start End L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 132 49 25 47 57 7 6 181 84 31 190 6 815 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 125 10 22 26 24 6 5 252 123 35 238 7 873 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 131 20 21 31 29 11 11 266 107 43 312 9 991 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 110 22 24 25 30 7 8 267 115 44 296 6 954 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 134 11 28 22 23 5 9 264 97 56 297 9 955 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 123 21 30 26 21 8 11 292 131 40 281 9 993 8:30 AM 8:45 AM 121 20 31 19 27 7 19 293 157 43 259 2 998 8:45 AM 9:00 AM 108 17 25 20 25 3 13 271 109 45 255 5 896 Total for:7:00 AM 8:00 AM 498 101 92 129 140 31 30 966 429 153 1036 28 3633 Total for:8:00 AM 9:00 AM 486 69 114 87 96 23 52 1120 494 184 1092 25 3842 Tota Peak Hour:7:45 AM 8:45 AM 488 74 113 92 101 27 47 1116 500 183 1133 26 3900 Overall PHF:0.98 Southbound Peak Hour Volumes 27 101 92 Tuskawilla Road 47 26 1116 1133 500 183 Tuskawilla Road 488 74 113 Northbound SR 4 3 4 SR 4 3 4 Ea s t b o u n d We s t b o u n d 358 TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT ANALYSIS TRUCKS Intersection (N/S): Tuskawilla Road Intersection (E/W): SR 434 Date: 8/26/2025 Tuskawilla Road Tuskawilla Road SR 434 SR 434 NB SB EB WB Start End L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 3 1 0 5 0 13 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 3 1 4 1 14 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 4 2 2 2 2 18 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 7 3 1 8 1 24 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 7 4 0 6 1 20 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 6 3 1 4 0 17 8:30 AM 8:45 AM 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 3 4 2 3 0 18 8:45 AM 9:00 AM 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 5 2 1 5 1 17 Total for:7:00 AM 8:00 AM 5 1 3 2 0 1 2 19 9 4 19 4 69 Total for:8:00 AM 9:00 AM 4 1 4 2 0 1 2 21 13 4 18 2 72 Tota Peak Hour:7:30 AM 8:30 AM 4 1 3 2 0 2 3 24 12 4 20 4 79 Overall PHF:0.82 Southbound Peak Hour Volumes 7% 0% 2% 2 0 2 Tuskawilla Road 6% 3 4 15% 2% 24 20 2% 2% 12 4 2% Tuskawilla Road 4 1 3 1% 1% 3% Northbound SR 4 3 4 SR 4 3 4 Ea s t b o u n d We s t b o u n d 359 TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT ANALYSIS AUTOS & TRUCKS Intersection (N/S): Tuskawilla Road Intersection (E/W): SR 434 Date: 8/26/2025 Tuskawilla Road Tuskawilla Road SR 434 SR 434 NB SB EB WB Start End L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 124 37 28 25 38 11 12 275 155 44 208 6 963 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 123 40 30 28 34 8 16 282 143 41 216 11 972 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 123 39 29 34 46 10 21 302 151 42 251 8 1056 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 119 34 27 30 41 7 18 279 146 40 281 10 1032 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 130 38 23 29 45 6 19 299 158 37 274 4 1062 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 126 42 30 26 48 9 20 328 141 32 331 9 1142 5:30 PM 5:45 PM 110 35 27 27 50 5 18 379 151 41 357 5 1205 5:45 PM 6:00 PM 117 38 26 29 44 7 13 322 144 36 297 6 1079 Total for:4:00 PM 5:00 PM 489 150 114 117 159 36 67 1138 595 167 956 35 4023 Total for:5:00 PM 6:00 PM 483 153 106 111 187 27 70 1328 594 146 1259 24 4488 Tota Peak Hour:5:00 PM 6:00 PM 483 153 106 111 187 27 70 1328 594 146 1259 24 4488 Overall PHF:0.93 Southbound Peak Hour Volumes 27 187 111 Tuskawilla Road 70 24 1328 1259 594 146 Tuskawilla Road 483 153 106 Northbound SR 4 3 4 SR 4 3 4 Ea s t b o u n d We s t b o u n d 360 TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT ANALYSIS TRUCKS Intersection (N/S): Tuskawilla Road Intersection (E/W): SR 434 Date: 8/26/2025 Tuskawilla Road Tuskawilla Road SR 434 SR 434 NB SB EB WB Start End L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 13 0 19 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 4 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 3 1 14 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 3 2 1 1 1 1 0 3 1 1 7 1 22 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 8 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 2 1 7 2 25 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 5 0 7 0 29 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 4 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 2 0 2 0 13 5:30 PM 5:45 PM 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 1 3 0 11 5:45 PM 6:00 PM 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 3 1 13 Total for:4:00 PM 5:00 PM 16 4 2 2 2 1 2 10 4 3 30 4 80 Total for:5:00 PM 6:00 PM 23 3 2 1 1 0 0 9 10 1 15 1 66 Tota Peak Hour:4:15 PM 5:15 PM 28 4 1 2 2 1 2 10 9 3 24 4 90 Overall PHF:0.78 Southbound Peak Hour Volumes 4%1%2% 1 2 2 Tuskawilla Road 3% 2 4 17% 1% 10 24 2% 2% 9 3 2% Tuskawilla Road 28 4 1 6% 3% 1% Northbound SR 4 3 4 SR 4 3 4 Ea s t b o u n d We s t b o u n d 361 TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT ANALYSIS AUTOS & TRUCKS Intersection (N/S): SR 434 Intersection (E/W): Eagle Edge Lane Date: 8/26/2025 SR 434 SR 434 Eagle Edge Lane Eagle Edge Lane NB SB EB WB Start End L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 252 0 0 214 2 483 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 299 0 0 275 1 582 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 317 0 0 342 1 680 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 316 0 0 329 3 666 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 313 0 0 349 2 680 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 348 0 0 311 5 681 8:30 AM 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 342 0 0 291 5 654 8:45 AM 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 315 0 0 288 1 619 Total for:7:00 AM 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 1184 0 0 1160 7 2411 Total for:8:00 AM 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 64 0 1318 0 0 1239 13 2634 Tota Peak Hour:7:30 AM 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 71 0 1294 0 0 1331 11 2707 Overall PHF:0.99 Southbound Peak Hour Volumes 71 0 0 SR 434 0 11 1294 1331 0 0 SR 434 0 0 0 Northbound Ea g l e E d g e L a n e Ea g l e E d g e L a n e Ea s t b o u n d We s t b o u n d 362 TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT ANALYSIS TRUCKS Intersection (N/S): SR 434 Intersection (E/W): Eagle Edge Lane Date: 8/26/2025 SR 434 SR 434 Eagle Edge Lane Eagle Edge Lane NB SB EB WB Start End L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 10 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 6 0 11 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 6 0 12 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 10 0 18 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 7 0 15 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 5 0 12 8:30 AM 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 5 0 11 8:45 AM 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 7 0 13 Total for:7:00 AM 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 27 0 51 Total for:8:00 AM 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 24 0 51 Tota Peak Hour:7:30 AM 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 0 28 0 57 Overall PHF:0.79 Southbound Peak Hour Volumes 0% 0% 0% 0 0 0 SR 434 0% 0 0 0% 2% 29 28 2% 0% 0 0 0% SR 434 0 0 0 0% 0% 0% Northbound Ea g l e E d g e L a n e Ea g l e E d g e L a n e Ea s t b o u n d We s t b o u n d 363 TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT ANALYSIS AUTOS & TRUCKS Intersection (N/S): SR 434 Intersection (E/W): Eagle Edge Lane Date: 8/26/2025 SR 434 SR 434 Eagle Edge Lane Eagle Edge Lane NB SB EB WB Start End L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 326 0 0 254 3 588 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 337 0 0 260 7 611 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 363 0 0 291 2 664 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 335 0 0 323 1 669 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 350 0 0 308 1 668 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 382 0 0 361 5 756 5:30 PM 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 431 0 0 396 3 839 5:45 PM 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 376 0 0 338 3 721 Total for:4:00 PM 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 1361 0 0 1128 13 2532 Total for:5:00 PM 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 1539 0 0 1403 12 2984 Tota Peak Hour:5:00 PM 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 1539 0 0 1403 12 2984 Overall PHF:0.89 Southbound Peak Hour Volumes 30 0 0 SR 434 0 12 1539 1403 0 0 SR 434 0 0 0 Northbound Ea g l e E d g e L a n e Ea g l e E d g e L a n e Ea s t b o u n d We s t b o u n d 364 TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT ANALYSIS TRUCKS Intersection (N/S): SR 434 Intersection (E/W): Eagle Edge Lane Date: 8/26/2025 SR 434 SR 434 Eagle Edge Lane Eagle Edge Lane NB SB EB WB Start End L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 13 1 18 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 5 0 7 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 9 0 14 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 10 0 13 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 7 0 10 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 5 5:30 PM 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 8 5:45 PM 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 0 6 Total for:4:00 PM 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 37 1 52 Total for:5:00 PM 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 17 0 29 Tota Peak Hour:4:00 PM 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 37 1 52 Overall PHF:0.72 Southbound Peak Hour Volumes 0%0%0% 0 0 0 SR 434 0% 0 1 8% 1% 14 37 3% 0% 0 0 0% SR 434 0 0 0 0% 0% 0% Northbound Ea g l e E d g e L a n e Ea g l e E d g e L a n e Ea s t b o u n d We s t b o u n d 365 TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT ANALYSIS AUTOS & TRUCKS Intersection (N/S): Michael Blake Boulevard Intersection (E/W): SR 434 Date: 8/26/2025 Michael Blake Boulevard Michael Blake Boulevard SR 434 SR 434 NB SB EB WB Start End L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 0 1 5 33 2 13 16 234 2 8 203 35 552 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 2 2 7 41 2 15 6 290 2 8 259 14 648 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 3 0 21 47 20 17 16 296 4 20 323 17 784 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 1 1 17 50 11 21 20 292 2 18 310 22 765 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 0 2 19 48 5 17 23 287 2 16 334 17 770 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 1 3 12 39 3 14 28 315 5 17 301 19 757 8:30 AM 8:45 AM 2 1 8 33 4 13 24 315 0 14 271 18 703 8:45 AM 9:00 AM 1 1 0 35 5 11 19 292 3 14 277 15 673 Total for:7:00 AM 8:00 AM 6 4 50 171 35 66 58 1112 10 54 1095 88 2749 Total for:8:00 AM 9:00 AM 4 7 39 155 17 55 94 1209 10 61 1183 69 2903 Tota Peak Hour:7:30 AM 8:30 AM 5 6 69 184 39 69 87 1190 13 71 1268 75 3076 Overall PHF:0.98 Southbound Peak Hour Volumes 69 39 184 Michael Blake Boulevard 87 75 1190 1268 13 71 Michael Blake Boulevard 5 6 69 Northbound SR 4 3 4 SR 4 3 4 Ea s t b o u n d We s t b o u n d 366 TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT ANALYSIS TRUCKS Intersection (N/S): Michael Blake Boulevard Intersection (E/W): SR 434 Date: 8/26/2025 Michael Blake Boulevard Michael Blake Boulevard SR 434 SR 434 NB SB EB WB Start End L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 10 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 1 6 0 12 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 0 0 5 0 13 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 8 0 0 9 1 19 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 1 7 0 16 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 5 1 0 5 0 13 8:30 AM 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 1 5 0 12 8:45 AM 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 6 1 1 6 1 16 Total for:7:00 AM 8:00 AM 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 23 1 1 25 1 54 Total for:8:00 AM 9:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 25 2 3 23 1 57 Tota Peak Hour:7:30 AM 8:30 AM 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 27 1 1 26 1 61 Overall PHF:0.80 Southbound Peak Hour Volumes 1% 0% 1% 1 0 1 Michael Blake Boulevard 1% 1 1 1% 2% 27 26 2% 8% 1 1 1% Michael Blake Boulevard 1 0 1 20% 0% 1% Northbound SR 4 3 4 SR 4 3 4 Ea s t b o u n d We s t b o u n d 367 TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT ANALYSIS AUTOS & TRUCKS Intersection (N/S): Michael Blake Boulevard Intersection (E/W): SR 434 Date: 8/26/2025 Michael Blake Boulevard Michael Blake Boulevard SR 434 SR 434 NB SB EB WB Start End L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 1 7 14 18 4 15 22 299 4 12 241 23 660 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 2 2 20 23 6 10 20 311 5 10 255 26 690 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 5 4 24 20 5 8 27 329 7 13 280 33 755 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 2 1 21 26 4 9 30 300 3 15 313 30 754 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 1 1 17 30 1 6 24 317 7 15 302 36 757 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 0 3 19 20 3 5 28 351 2 11 361 29 832 5:30 PM 5:45 PM 0 0 21 21 4 7 25 403 3 10 392 28 914 5:45 PM 6:00 PM 1 1 14 23 2 9 23 348 4 12 331 31 799 Total for:4:00 PM 5:00 PM 10 14 79 87 19 42 99 1239 19 50 1089 112 2859 Total for:5:00 PM 6:00 PM 2 5 71 94 10 27 100 1419 16 48 1386 124 3302 Tota Peak Hour:5:00 PM 6:00 PM 2 5 71 94 10 27 100 1419 16 48 1386 124 3302 Overall PHF:0.90 Southbound Peak Hour Volumes 27 10 94 Michael Blake Boulevard 100 124 1419 1386 16 48 Michael Blake Boulevard 2 5 71 Northbound SR 4 3 4 SR 4 3 4 Ea s t b o u n d We s t b o u n d 368 TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT ANALYSIS TRUCKS Intersection (N/S): Michael Blake Boulevard Intersection (E/W): SR 434 Date: 8/26/2025 Michael Blake Boulevard Michael Blake Boulevard SR 434 SR 434 NB SB EB WB Start End L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 14 1 21 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 5 0 8 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 9 0 14 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 10 0 13 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 7 0 10 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 7 5:30 PM 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 8 5:45 PM 6:00 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 0 7 Total for:4:00 PM 5:00 PM 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 14 0 0 38 1 56 Total for:5:00 PM 6:00 PM 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 12 0 0 17 0 32 Tota Peak Hour:4:00 PM 5:00 PM 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 14 0 0 38 1 56 Overall PHF:0.67 Southbound Peak Hour Volumes 0%0%1% 0 0 1 Michael Blake Boulevard 0% 0 1 1% 1% 14 38 3% 0% 0 0 0% Michael Blake Boulevard 0 1 1 0% 20% 1% Northbound SR 4 3 4 SR 4 3 4 Ea s t b o u n d We s t b o u n d 369 2024 PEAK SEASON FACTOR CATEGORY REPORT - REPORT TYPE: ALL CATEGORY: 7700 SEMINOLE COUNTYWIDE MOCF: 0.96 WEEK DATES SF PSCF ================================================================================ 1 01/01/2024 - 01/06/2024 1.02 1.06 2 01/07/2024 - 01/13/2024 1.03 1.07 3 01/14/2024 - 01/20/2024 1.04 1.08 4 01/21/2024 - 01/27/2024 1.02 1.06 5 01/28/2024 - 02/03/2024 1.00 1.04 6 02/04/2024 - 02/10/2024 0.99 1.03 7 02/11/2024 - 02/17/2024 0.97 1.01 * 8 02/18/2024 - 02/24/2024 0.97 1.01 * 9 02/25/2024 - 03/02/2024 0.97 1.01 *10 03/03/2024 - 03/09/2024 0.96 1.00 *11 03/10/2024 - 03/16/2024 0.96 1.00 *12 03/17/2024 - 03/23/2024 0.96 1.00 *13 03/24/2024 - 03/30/2024 0.96 1.00 *14 03/31/2024 - 04/06/2024 0.96 1.00 *15 04/07/2024 - 04/13/2024 0.96 1.00 *16 04/14/2024 - 04/20/2024 0.96 1.00 *17 04/21/2024 - 04/27/2024 0.96 1.00 *18 04/28/2024 - 05/04/2024 0.96 1.00 *19 05/05/2024 - 05/11/2024 0.97 1.01 *20 05/12/2024 - 05/18/2024 0.97 1.01 21 05/19/2024 - 05/25/2024 0.98 1.02 22 05/26/2024 - 06/01/2024 0.99 1.03 23 06/02/2024 - 06/08/2024 1.00 1.04 24 06/09/2024 - 06/15/2024 1.01 1.05 25 06/16/2024 - 06/22/2024 1.01 1.05 26 06/23/2024 - 06/29/2024 1.01 1.05 27 06/30/2024 - 07/06/2024 1.02 1.06 28 07/07/2024 - 07/13/2024 1.02 1.06 29 07/14/2024 - 07/20/2024 1.03 1.07 30 07/21/2024 - 07/27/2024 1.02 1.06 31 07/28/2024 - 08/03/2024 1.01 1.05 32 08/04/2024 - 08/10/2024 1.01 1.05 33 08/11/2024 - 08/17/2024 1.00 1.04 34 08/18/2024 - 08/24/2024 1.00 1.04 35 08/25/2024 - 08/31/2024 1.01 1.05 36 09/01/2024 - 09/07/2024 1.01 1.05 37 09/08/2024 - 09/14/2024 1.01 1.05 38 09/15/2024 - 09/21/2024 1.02 1.06 39 09/22/2024 - 09/28/2024 1.02 1.06 40 09/29/2024 - 10/05/2024 1.02 1.06 41 10/06/2024 - 10/12/2024 1.02 1.06 42 10/13/2024 - 10/19/2024 1.03 1.07 43 10/20/2024 - 10/26/2024 1.04 1.08 44 10/27/2024 - 11/02/2024 1.06 1.10 45 11/03/2024 - 11/09/2024 1.08 1.13 46 11/10/2024 - 11/16/2024 1.10 1.15 47 11/17/2024 - 11/23/2024 1.08 1.13 48 11/24/2024 - 11/30/2024 1.07 1.11 49 12/01/2024 - 12/07/2024 1.05 1.09 50 12/08/2024 - 12/14/2024 1.04 1.08 51 12/15/2024 - 12/21/2024 1.02 1.06 52 12/22/2024 - 12/28/2024 1.03 1.07 53 12/29/2024 - 12/31/2024 1.04 1.08 * PEAK SEASON 04-MAR-2025 16:32:53 830UPD 5_7700_PKSEASON.TXT 370 2024 PEAK SEASON FACTOR CATEGORY REPORT - REPORT TYPE: ALL CATEGORY: 7744 SEMINOLE I4 URBAN MOCF: 0.97 WEEK DATES SF PSCF ================================================================================ 1 01/01/2024 - 01/06/2024 1.00 1.03 2 01/07/2024 - 01/13/2024 1.01 1.04 3 01/14/2024 - 01/20/2024 1.02 1.05 4 01/21/2024 - 01/27/2024 1.01 1.04 5 01/28/2024 - 02/03/2024 1.00 1.03 6 02/04/2024 - 02/10/2024 0.99 1.02 7 02/11/2024 - 02/17/2024 0.98 1.01 8 02/18/2024 - 02/24/2024 0.98 1.01 * 9 02/25/2024 - 03/02/2024 0.97 1.00 *10 03/03/2024 - 03/09/2024 0.97 1.00 *11 03/10/2024 - 03/16/2024 0.96 0.99 *12 03/17/2024 - 03/23/2024 0.96 0.99 *13 03/24/2024 - 03/30/2024 0.97 1.00 *14 03/31/2024 - 04/06/2024 0.97 1.00 *15 04/07/2024 - 04/13/2024 0.97 1.00 *16 04/14/2024 - 04/20/2024 0.97 1.00 *17 04/21/2024 - 04/27/2024 0.97 1.00 *18 04/28/2024 - 05/04/2024 0.98 1.01 *19 05/05/2024 - 05/11/2024 0.98 1.01 *20 05/12/2024 - 05/18/2024 0.98 1.01 *21 05/19/2024 - 05/25/2024 0.98 1.01 22 05/26/2024 - 06/01/2024 0.99 1.02 23 06/02/2024 - 06/08/2024 0.99 1.02 24 06/09/2024 - 06/15/2024 0.99 1.02 25 06/16/2024 - 06/22/2024 0.99 1.02 26 06/23/2024 - 06/29/2024 1.00 1.03 27 06/30/2024 - 07/06/2024 1.00 1.03 28 07/07/2024 - 07/13/2024 1.00 1.03 29 07/14/2024 - 07/20/2024 1.01 1.04 30 07/21/2024 - 07/27/2024 1.01 1.04 31 07/28/2024 - 08/03/2024 1.01 1.04 32 08/04/2024 - 08/10/2024 1.01 1.04 33 08/11/2024 - 08/17/2024 1.01 1.04 34 08/18/2024 - 08/24/2024 1.01 1.04 35 08/25/2024 - 08/31/2024 1.02 1.05 36 09/01/2024 - 09/07/2024 1.02 1.05 37 09/08/2024 - 09/14/2024 1.02 1.05 38 09/15/2024 - 09/21/2024 1.02 1.05 39 09/22/2024 - 09/28/2024 1.03 1.06 40 09/29/2024 - 10/05/2024 1.04 1.07 41 10/06/2024 - 10/12/2024 1.04 1.07 42 10/13/2024 - 10/19/2024 1.05 1.08 43 10/20/2024 - 10/26/2024 1.05 1.08 44 10/27/2024 - 11/02/2024 1.05 1.08 45 11/03/2024 - 11/09/2024 1.05 1.08 46 11/10/2024 - 11/16/2024 1.06 1.09 47 11/17/2024 - 11/23/2024 1.05 1.08 48 11/24/2024 - 11/30/2024 1.04 1.07 49 12/01/2024 - 12/07/2024 1.02 1.05 50 12/08/2024 - 12/14/2024 1.01 1.04 51 12/15/2024 - 12/21/2024 1.00 1.03 52 12/22/2024 - 12/28/2024 1.01 1.04 53 12/29/2024 - 12/31/2024 1.02 1.05 * PEAK SEASON 04-MAR-2025 16:32:53 830UPD 5_7744_PKSEASON.TXT 371 Name Direction WL ET _ST EL WT _NT ________ Channel 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Phase/OL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2 4 6 8 Type VEH VEH VEH VEH VEH VEH VEH VEH OLP OLP OLP OLP PED PED PED PED Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ___4 ___8 Min Green 6 15 _6 6 15 _6 ___________6 ___6 Passage 3 4 _4 3 4 _4 ___________6 ___6 Max 1 30 80 _65 20 95 _80 ___________65 ___65 Max 2 30 80 _65 20 95 _80 ___________65 ___65 Yellow Clr 4.9 4.9 _3.4 4.9 4.9 _4.8 ___________3.4 ___4.8 Red Clr 2.9 2.9 _3.9 2.9 2.9 _4.1 ___________3.9 ___4.1 Walk _7 _7 _7 _7 ___________7 ___7 Ped Clear _33 _40 _21 _41 ___________40 ___41 Red Revert 3 3 _3 3 3 _3 ________ Added Init ________________________ Max Initial ________________________ Max 3 Limit ________________________ Max 3 Step ________________________ Time B-4 ________________________ Cars B-4 ________________________ Time to ________________________ Reduce By ________________________ Min Gap ________________________ Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Phase 1 2 _4 5 6 _8 Enable ✓✓_✓✓✓_✓________Max 2 ________ Min Recall _✓___✓__________Max Inhibit ✓✓_✓✓✓_✓ Max Recall ________________Cnf Phase ________ Ped Recall ________________ Soft Recall ________________Phase 1 2 _4 5 6 _8 Lock Call ✓✓_✓✓✓_✓________Max 2 ________ Flash Ent _______✓________Max Inhibit _✓___✓__ Flash Exit _✓___✓__________________ Dual Entry _✓___✓__________ Sim Gap _✓___✓__________Phase ________ Cond Serv ________________Max2 ________ Reservice ________________Max Inhibit ________ Cnf Phase ________________________ FYA Grn Yel Red Overlap - A ____________________ Overlap - B ____________________ Overlap - C ____________________ Overlap - D ____________________ Overlap - E ____________________ Overlap - F ____________________ Overlap - G ____________________ Overlap - H ____________________ Overlap - I ____________________ Overlap - J ____________________ Overlap - K ____________________ Overlap - L ____________________ Overlap - M ____________________ Overlap - N ____________________ Overlap - O ____________________ Overlap - P ____________________ Seminole County Traffic Engineering Timing Sheet Intersection: SR 434 @ (36) Tuskawilla Rd _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Type _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Included Phase Phase Min Green Ped Clr Phase Options Ped Clr Alt Phase Opt 1 Passage Max 1 Max 2 Yel Clr Red Clr Modifier Phase Walk Alt Phase Opt 2 Cnf Phase Alt Phase Opt 3 Cnf Phase Phase Mode QSeq Free Seq 1 Red Clr Walk Alt Phase Times 2 Phase Times Alt Phase Times 1 Phase Min Green Passage Max 1 SCTE\KMartin Max 2 Yel Clr _InSync _ Node #2392 Free Action 254SR 434 Tuskawilla SR 434 Tuskawilla Date February 10, 2025 Done By Comm ID 1365 P2P Pattern Syn Green _ 372 Split 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1 2 3 4 5 Cycle =190 31 70 _30 19 82 _59 ________Hour _9 11 17 20 ___ Seq =2 _✓______________P Min _30 __30 ___ Mode _MAX ___MAX __________L Action 254 8 18 9 254 ___ Split 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A Cycle =_________________N Hour ________ Seq =_________________Min ________ Mode ________________1 Action ________ Split 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Cycle =150 29 51 _28 22 58 _42 ________Hour _6 6 7 7 10 14 14 Seq =1 _✓______________P Min _30 45 _30 30 15 45 Mode _MAX ___MAX __________L Action 254 1 11 21 1 3 13 3 Split 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A 9 10 11 12 13 Cycle =190 34 82 _32 24 92 _42 ________N Hour 15 16 18 19 21 ___ Seq =1 _✓______________Min _45 __30 ___ Mode _MAX ___MAX __________2 Action 4 25 4 5 254 ___ Split 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Cycle =140 25 51 _28 21 55 _36 ________Hour _6 6 7 7 10 14 14 Seq =2 _✓______________P Min _30 45 _30 30 15 45 Mode _MAX ___MAX __________L Action 254 1 11 21 1 3 13 3 Split 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A 9 10 11 12 13 Cycle =120 26 42 _22 19 49 _30 ________N Hour 15 16 18 19 21 ___ Seq =7 _____✓__________Min _45 __30 ___ Mode _MAX ___MAX __________3 Action 4 25 4 5 254 ___ Split 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Cycle =120 23 44 _21 21 46 _32 ________Hour _6 6 7 7 10 13 13 Seq =5 _✓______________P Min _30 45 _30 30 15 45 Mode _MAX ___MAX __________L Action 254 1 11 21 1 3 13 3 Split 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A 9 10 11 12 13 Cycle =120 26 42 _22 19 49 _30 ________N Hour 15 16 18 19 21 ___ Seq =7 _____✓__________Min _45 __30 ___ Mode _MAX ___MAX __________4 Action 4 25 4 5 254 ___ Split 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Cycle =120 23 44 _21 21 46 _32 ________Hour _6 6 7 7 10 14 14 Seq =5 _✓______________P Min _30 45 _30 30 15 45 Mode _MAX ___MAX __________L Action 254 1 11 21 1 3 13 3 Split 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A 9 10 11 12 13 Cycle =_________________N Hour 15 16 18 19 21 ___ Seq =_________________Min _45 __30 ___ Mode ________________5 Action 4 25 4 5 254 ___ Split 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Cycle =190 24 50 _36 22 52 _80 ________Hour _6 6 7 7 10 14 14 Seq =2 _✓______________P Min _30 45 _30 30 15 45 Mode _MAX ___MAX __________L Action 254 1 11 21 1 3 13 3 Split 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A 9 10 11 12 13 Cycle =_________________N Hour 15 16 18 19 21 ___ Seq =_________________Min _45 __30 ___ Mode ________________6 Action 4 25 4 5 254 ___ Split 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1 2 3 4 5 Cycle =150 23 42 _47 21 44 _38 ________Hour _8 9 18 21 ___ Seq =1 _✓______________P Min __30 _30 ___ Mode _MAX ___MAX __________L Action 254 6 16 7 254 ___ Split 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A Cycle =_________________N Hour ________ Seq =_________________Min ________ Mode ________________7 Action ________ Split 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Cycle =_________________Hour _6 6 7 7 10 11 13 Seq =_________________P Min _30 45 _30 30 _45 Mode ________________L Action 254 1 11 21 1 3 13 3 Split 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A 9 10 11 12 13 Cycle =140 27 45 _34 21 51 _34 ________N Hour 15 16 18 19 21 ___ Seq =2 _✓______________Min _45 __30 ___ Mode _MAX ___MAX __________8 Action 4 25 4 5 254 ___ Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Coordination Splits 1-16 Day Plans 1-8 373 Split 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Cycle =190 25 92 _33 20 97 _40 ________Hour ________ Seq =6 _✓______________P Min ________ Mode _MAX ___MAX __________L Action ________ Split 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A Cycle =140 27 45 _34 21 51 _34 ________N Hour ________ Seq =2 _✓______________Min ________ Mode _MAX ___MAX __________9 Action ________ Split 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Cycle =190 25 92 _33 20 97 _40 ________Hour ________ Seq =1 _✓______________P Min ________ Mode _MAX ___MAX __________L Action ________ Split 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A Cycle =_________________N Hour ________ Seq =_________________Min ________ Mode ________________10 Action ________ Split 21 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Cycle =190 24 53 _56 24 53 _57 ________Hour ________ Seq =2 _✓______________P Min ________ Mode _MAX ___MAX __________L Action ________ Split 22 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A Cycle =_________________N Hour ________ Seq =_________________Min ________ Mode ________________11 Action ________ Split 23 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Cycle =_________________Hour ________ Seq =_________________P Min ________ Mode ________________L Action ________ Split 24 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A Cycle =_________________N Hour ________ Seq =_________________Min ________ Mode ________________12 Action ________ Split 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Cycle =220 40 93 _37 29 104 _50 ________Hour ________ Seq =1 _✓______________P Min ________ Mode _MAX ___MAX __________L Action ________ Split 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A Cycle =_________________N Hour ________ Seq =_________________Min ________ Mode ________________13 Action ________ Split 27 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Cycle =_________________Hour ________ Seq =_________________P Min ________ Mode ________________L Action ________ Split 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A Cycle =_________________N Hour ________ Seq =_________________Min ________ Mode ________________14 Action ________ Split 29 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Cycle =_________________Hour ________ Seq =_________________P Min ________ Mode ________________L Action ________ Split 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A Cycle =_________________N Hour ________ Seq =_________________Min ________ Mode ________________15 Action ________ Split 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Cycle =_________________Hour ________ Seq =_________________P Min ________ Mode ________________L Action ________ Split 32 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A Cycle =_________________N Hour ________ Seq =_________________Min ________ Mode ________________16 Action ________ Coordination Splits 17-32 Day Plans 9-16 374 Cycle Offset Split Seq Coord Time Opt Det CIR Short Long No S No S Yield Max 2 Float R-Hld Y-Inh Off-1 Off-2 Off-3 Off-4 Off-5 Off-6 Off-7 Off-8 Pattern - 1 190 20 1 2 2 _1 __12 22 _____✓✓________ Pattern - 2 __________________________ Pattern - 3 150 5 3 1 2 _1 __12 22 ON ____✓✓________ Pattern - 4 190 86 4 1 2 _2 __6 40 ON ___✓✓✓________ Pattern - 5 140 19 5 2 2 _1 __12 22 _____✓✓________ Pattern - 6 120 72 6 7 6 _1 __12 22 _____✓✓________ Pattern - 7 120 89 7 5 2 _1 __12 22 _____✓✓________ Pattern - 8 120 72 8 7 6 _1 __12 22 _____✓✓________ Pattern - 9 120 89 9 5 2 _1 __12 22 _____✓✓________ Pattern - 10 __________________________ Pattern - 11 190 20 11 2 2 _1 __12 22 _____✓✓________ Pattern - 12 __________________________ Pattern - 13 150 2 13 1 2 1 2 __12 22 ____✓✓✓________ Pattern - 14 __________________________ Pattern - 15 __________________________ Pattern - 16 140 1 16 2 2 _2 __12 22 ____✓✓✓________ Pattern - 17 190 141 17 6 2 _1 __12 22 _____✓✓________ Pattern - 18 140 1 18 2 2 _2 __12 22 ____✓✓✓________ Pattern - 19 190 93 19 1 2 _1 __12 22 _____✓✓________ Pattern - 20 __________________________ Pattern - 21 190 20 21 2 2 _1 __12 22 _____✓✓________ Pattern - 22 __________________________ Pattern - 23 __________________________ Pattern - 24 __________________________ Pattern - 25 220 1 25 1 2 _2 __12 22 ____✓✓✓________ Pattern - 26 __________________________ Pattern - 27 __________________________ Pattern - 28 __________________________ Pattern - 29 __________________________ Pattern - 30 __________________________ Pattern - 31 __________________________ Pattern - 32 __________________________ Cycle Offset Split Seq Coord Time Opt Det CIR Short Long No S No S Yield Max 2 Float R-Hld Y-Inh Off-1 Off-2 Off-3 Off-4 Off-5 Off-6 Off-7 Off-8 Pattern - 33 __________________________ Pattern - 34 __________________________ Pattern - 35 __________________________ Pattern - 36 __________________________ Pattern - 37 __________________________ Pattern - 38 __________________________ Pattern - 39 __________________________ Pattern - 40 __________________________ Pattern - 41 __________________________ Pattern - 42 __________________________ Pattern - 43 __________________________ Pattern - 44 __________________________ Pattern - 45 __________________________ Pattern - 46 __________________________ Pattern - 47 __________________________ Pattern - 48 __________________________ BIU-1 Call Swt Dly Lck Src Call Swt Dly Lck Src Call Swt Dly Lck Src Call Swt Dly Lck Src Detector 1 1 ___________________ Detector 2 2 ___________________ Detector 3 2 ___________________ Detector 4 4 ___________________ Detector 5 4 ___________________ Detector 6 5 ___________________ Detector 7 6 ___________________ Detector 8 6 ___________________ Detector 9 6 ___________________ Detector 10 6 ___________________ Detector 11 8 ___________________ Detector 12 8 ___________________ Detector 13 8 ___________________ Detector 14 ____________________ Detector 15 ____________________ Detector 16 ____________________ BIU-4 49 50 51 52 53 47 48 37 38 39 40 41 42 60 61 62 63 64 58 5943 44 54 55 56 57 33 34 35 36 23 24 25 26 27 29 30 31 32 BIU-2 BIU-3 28 17 18 19 20 21 22 45 46 375 Enbl Grn Dwl Pre Run 1 __________________________ Pre Run 2 __________________________ Pre Run 3 ON ________8 _______8 ____1 5 __ Pre Run 4 ON ________4 _______8 ____1 5 __ Pre Run 5 ON ________2 5 ______8 ____2 6 __ Pre Run 6 ON ________1 6 ______8 ____2 6 __ P6 P6 6 1 P6 P6 P4 P8 W E 5 6 4 1 2 2R 8 5 P2 P2 P4 P8 2 P2 P2 1 2 4 3 5 6 7 8 P6 P6 P6 P6 P4 P8 6 6 5 4 1 2 2 2R 8 P2 P2 P2 P2 P4 P8 1 2 4 3 6 5 7 8 P6 P6 6 1 P6 P6 P8 P4 5 6 4 1 2 2R 8 5 P2 P2 P8 P4 2 P2 P2 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 7 P6 P6 P6 P6 P8 P4 6 6 5 4 1 2 2 2R 8 P2 P2 P2 P2 P8 P4 1 2 3 4 6 5 8 7 Seq 6 Ring 1 Ring 2 Ring 1 Ring 2 Tuskawilla Rd S.R. 434 Seq 5 Ring 1 Ring 2 S.R 434 Tuskawilla Rd S.R. 434 S Cabinet Seq 1 & 9 Ring 1 Ring 2 S.R 434 Tuskawilla Rd Seq 2 & 10 N Tuskawilla Rd Pattern 25 used during PM rush to help manage the amount of veh/ped traffic. Main street LT's changed to protected Jan 2018 per FDOT. Alt Time Plan 1 to allow higher extend times to phase 4 for PM school 2R hardwired to Phase 8.rush time. Intersection set as concurent sides. But operates as Q-Seq due to Signal re-timed April 2024. set up of controller (phases enabled and conflicting phases).Patterns 11,13 & 21 are used for High School rush. Pattern 17 and 19 used for SR 417 diversion Route. Intersection Notes T.O.D Notes Track Overlap Dwell Phase Dwell Overlap Exit PhaseTrack Phase 376 P6 P6 P6 P6 P8 P4 5 6 6 4 2 2 1 2R 8 P2 P2 P2 P2 P8 P4 2 1 3 4 5 6 8 7 S.R 434 Tuskawilla Rd Seq 7 Ring 1 Ring 2 377 Name Direction WL ET NL SR EL WT ST NT ________ Channel 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Phase/OL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2 4 6 8 Type OLP VEH VEH VEH OLP VEH VEH VEH OLP OLP OLP OLP PED PED PED PED Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ________ Min Green 7 15 _6 7 15 _6 ________________ Passage 3 4 _3 3 4 _3 ________________ Max 1 30 80 _45 30 80 _45 ________________ Max 2 30 80 _45 30 80 _45 ________________ Yellow Clr 5.2 5.2 _4.4 5.2 5.2 _4.4 ________________ Red Clr 2.6 2.6 _3.2 2.6 2.6 _3.2 ________________ Walk _7 _7 _7 _7 ________________ Ped Clear _18 _30 _18 _32 ________________ Red Revert 3 3 _3 3 3 _3 ________ Added Init ________________________ Max Initial ________________________ Max 3 Limit ________________________ Max 3 Step ________________________ Time B-4 ________________________ Cars B-4 ________________________ Time to ________________________ Reduce By ________________________ Min Gap ________________________ Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Phase 1 2 _4 5 6 _8 Enable ✓✓_✓✓✓_✓________Max 2 ________ Min Recall _✓___✓__________Max Inhibit ✓✓_✓✓✓_✓ Max Recall ________________Cnf Phase ________ Ped Recall ________________ Soft Recall ________________Phase 1 2 _4 5 6 _8 Lock Call _✓___✓__________Max 2 ________ Flash Ent _______✓________Max Inhibit _✓___✓__ Flash Exit _✓___✓__________________ Dual Entry _✓___✓__________ Sim Gap _✓___✓__________Phase ________ Cond Serv ________________Max2 ________ Reservice ________________Max Inhibit ________ Cnf Phase ________________________ FYA Grn Yel Red Overlap - A 1 _______2 _______3 _5.2 2.6 Overlap - B ____________________ Overlap - C ____________________ Overlap - D ____________________ Overlap - E 5 _______6 _______3 _5.2 2.6 Overlap - F ____________________ Overlap - G ____________________ Overlap - H ____________________ Overlap - I ____________________ Overlap - J ____________________ Overlap - K ____________________ Overlap - L ____________________ Overlap - M ____________________ Overlap - N ____________________ Overlap - O ____________________ Overlap - P ____________________ Seminole County Traffic Engineering Timing Sheet Intersection: SR 434 @ (37) Michael Blake Blvd _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Type FYA-4 _ _ _ FYA-4 _ _ _ _ Included Phase Phase Min Green Ped Clr Phase Options Ped Clr Alt Phase Opt 1 Passage Max 1 Max 2 Yel Clr Red Clr Modifier Phase Walk Alt Phase Opt 2 Cnf Phase Alt Phase Opt 3 Cnf Phase Phase Mode QSeq Free Seq 1 Red Clr Walk Alt Phase Times 2 Phase Times Alt Phase Times 1 Phase Min Green Passage Max 1 SCTE\KMartin Max 2 Yel Clr _InSync _ Node #23404 Free Action 254SR 434 Mch Blake SR 434 Mch Blake Date February 10, 2025 Done By Comm ID 1366 P2P Pattern Syn Green _ 378 Split 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1 2 3 4 5 Cycle =190 25 97 _34 25 97 _34 ________Hour _9 11 17 20 ___ Seq =2 _✓______________P Min _30 __30 ___ Mode _MAX ___MAX __________L Action 254 8 18 9 254 ___ Split 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A Cycle =_________________N Hour ________ Seq =_________________Min ________ Mode ________________1 Action ________ Split 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Cycle =150 20 62 _34 20 62 _34 ________Hour _6 10 15 16 18 19 21 Seq =2 _✓______________P Min _30 30 _45 __30 Mode _MAX ___MAX __________L Action 254 1 3 4 25 4 5 254 Split 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A Cycle =190 25 97 _34 25 97 _34 ________N Hour ________ Seq =2 _✓______________Min ________ Mode _MAX ___MAX __________2 Action ________ Split 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Cycle =140 18 69 _26 18 69 _27 ________Hour _6 10 15 16 18 19 21 Seq =2 _✓______________P Min _30 30 _45 __30 Mode _MAX ___MAX __________L Action 254 1 3 4 25 4 5 254 Split 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A Cycle =120 18 57 _22 18 57 _23 ________N Hour ________ Seq =3 _____✓__________Min ________ Mode _MAX ___MAX __________3 Action ________ Split 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Cycle =120 18 54 _24 18 54 _24 ________Hour _6 10 15 16 18 19 21 Seq =2 _✓______________P Min _30 30 _45 __30 Mode _MAX ___MAX __________L Action 254 1 3 4 25 4 5 254 Split 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A Cycle =120 18 57 _22 18 57 _23 ________N Hour ________ Seq =3 _____✓__________Min ________ Mode _MAX ___MAX __________4 Action ________ Split 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Cycle =120 18 54 _24 18 54 _24 ________Hour _6 10 15 16 18 19 21 Seq =2 _✓______________P Min _30 30 _45 __30 Mode _MAX ___MAX __________L Action 254 1 3 4 25 4 5 254 Split 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A Cycle =_________________N Hour ________ Seq =_________________Min ________ Mode ________________5 Action ________ Split 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Cycle =_________________Hour _6 10 15 16 18 19 21 Seq =_________________P Min _30 30 _45 __30 Mode ________________L Action 254 1 3 4 25 4 5 254 Split 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A Cycle =_________________N Hour ________ Seq =_________________Min ________ Mode ________________6 Action ________ Split 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1 2 3 4 5 Cycle =_________________Hour _8 9 18 21 ___ Seq =_________________P Min __30 _____ Mode ________________L Action 254 6 16 7 254 ___ Split 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A Cycle =_________________N Hour ________ Seq =_________________Min ________ Mode ________________7 Action ________ Split 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Cycle =_________________Hour ________ Seq =_________________P Min ________ Mode ________________L Action ________ Split 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A Cycle =140 18 64 _29 18 64 _29 ________N Hour ________ Seq =2 _✓______________Min ________ Mode _MAX ___MAX __________8 Action ________ Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Coordination Splits 1-16 Day Plans 1-8 379 Split 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Cycle =_________________Hour ________ Seq =_________________P Min ________ Mode ________________L Action ________ Split 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A Cycle =140 18 64 _29 18 64 _29 ________N Hour ________ Seq =2 _✓______________Min ________ Mode _MAX ___MAX __________9 Action ________ Split 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Cycle =_________________Hour ________ Seq =_________________P Min ________ Mode ________________L Action ________ Split 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A Cycle =_________________N Hour ________ Seq =_________________Min ________ Mode ________________10 Action ________ Split 21 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Cycle =_________________Hour ________ Seq =_________________P Min ________ Mode ________________L Action ________ Split 22 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A Cycle =_________________N Hour ________ Seq =_________________Min ________ Mode ________________11 Action ________ Split 23 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Cycle =_________________Hour ________ Seq =_________________P Min ________ Mode ________________L Action ________ Split 24 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A Cycle =_________________N Hour ________ Seq =_________________Min ________ Mode ________________12 Action ________ Split 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Cycle =220 30 117 _35 30 117 _38 ________Hour ________ Seq =2 _✓______________P Min ________ Mode _MAX ___MAX __________L Action ________ Split 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A Cycle =_________________N Hour ________ Seq =_________________Min ________ Mode ________________13 Action ________ Split 27 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Cycle =_________________Hour ________ Seq =_________________P Min ________ Mode ________________L Action ________ Split 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A Cycle =_________________N Hour ________ Seq =_________________Min ________ Mode ________________14 Action ________ Split 29 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Cycle =_________________Hour ________ Seq =_________________P Min ________ Mode ________________L Action ________ Split 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A Cycle =_________________N Hour ________ Seq =_________________Min ________ Mode ________________15 Action ________ Split 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Cycle =_________________Hour ________ Seq =_________________P Min ________ Mode ________________L Action ________ Split 32 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A Cycle =_________________N Hour ________ Seq =_________________Min ________ Mode ________________16 Action ________ Coordination Splits 17-32 Day Plans 9-16 380 Cycle Offset Split Seq Coord Time Opt Det CIR Short Long No S No S Yield Max 2 Float R-Hld Y-Inh Off-1 Off-2 Off-3 Off-4 Off-5 Off-6 Off-7 Off-8 Pattern - 1 190 35 1 2 2 _1 __12 22 _____✓✓________ Pattern - 2 __________________________ Pattern - 3 150 16 3 2 2 _1 __12 22 _____✓✓________ Pattern - 4 190 105 4 2 2 _1 __12 22 _____✓✓________ Pattern - 5 140 18 5 2 2 _1 __12 22 _____✓✓________ Pattern - 6 120 67 6 3 6 _1 __12 22 _____✓✓________ Pattern - 7 120 104 7 2 2 _1 __12 22 _____✓✓________ Pattern - 8 120 67 8 3 6 _1 __12 22 _____✓✓________ Pattern - 9 120 104 9 2 2 _1 __12 22 _____✓✓________ Pattern - 10 __________________________ Pattern - 11 __________________________ Pattern - 12 __________________________ Pattern - 13 __________________________ Pattern - 14 __________________________ Pattern - 15 __________________________ Pattern - 16 140 6 16 2 2 _1 __12 22 _____✓✓________ Pattern - 17 __________________________ Pattern - 18 140 6 18 2 2 _1 __12 22 _____✓✓________ Pattern - 19 __________________________ Pattern - 20 __________________________ Pattern - 21 __________________________ Pattern - 22 __________________________ Pattern - 23 __________________________ Pattern - 24 __________________________ Pattern - 25 220 32 25 2 2 _1 __12 22 _____✓✓________ Pattern - 26 __________________________ Pattern - 27 __________________________ Pattern - 28 __________________________ Pattern - 29 __________________________ Pattern - 30 __________________________ Pattern - 31 __________________________ Pattern - 32 __________________________ Cycle Offset Split Seq Coord Time Opt Det CIR Short Long No S No S Yield Max 2 Float R-Hld Y-Inh Off-1 Off-2 Off-3 Off-4 Off-5 Off-6 Off-7 Off-8 Pattern - 33 __________________________ Pattern - 34 __________________________ Pattern - 35 __________________________ Pattern - 36 __________________________ Pattern - 37 __________________________ Pattern - 38 __________________________ Pattern - 39 __________________________ Pattern - 40 __________________________ Pattern - 41 __________________________ Pattern - 42 __________________________ Pattern - 43 __________________________ Pattern - 44 __________________________ Pattern - 45 __________________________ Pattern - 46 __________________________ Pattern - 47 __________________________ Pattern - 48 __________________________ BIU-1 Call Swt Dly Lck Src Call Swt Dly Lck Src Call Swt Dly Lck Src Call Swt Dly Lck Src Detector 1 1 _12 _________________ Detector 2 2 ___________________ Detector 3 2 ___________________ Detector 4 2 ___________________ Detector 5 2 ___________________ Detector 6 8 ___________________ Detector 7 4 _12 _________________ Detector 8 5 _12 _________________ Detector 9 6 ___________________ Detector 10 6 ___________________ Detector 11 6 ___________________ Detector 12 6 ___________________ Detector 13 4 ___________________ Detector 14 8 _12 _________________ Detector 15 ____________________ Detector 16 ____________________ BIU-4 49 50 51 52 53 47 48 37 38 39 40 41 42 60 61 62 63 64 58 5943 44 54 55 56 57 33 34 35 36 23 24 25 26 27 29 30 31 32 BIU-2 BIU-3 28 17 18 19 20 21 22 45 46 381 Enbl Grn Dwl Pre Run 1 __________________________ Pre Run 2 __________________________ Pre Run 3 ON ________8 _______8 ____2 6 __ Pre Run 4 ON ________4 _______8 ____2 6 __ Pre Run 5 ON ________2 5 ______8 1 5 __2 6 __ Pre Run 6 ON ________1 6 ______8 1 5 __2 6 __ P6 P6 6 1 P6 P6 P4 P8 W E 5 FYA 6 4 1 2 FYA 8 5 P2 P2 P4 P8 2 P2 P2 1 2 3 4 7 8 5 6 P6 P6 P6 P6 P4 P8 6 FYA 6 5 4 1 2 FYA 2 8 P2 P2 P2 P2 P4 P8 1 2 3 4 7 8 6 5 P6 P6 P6 P6 P4 P8 5 FYA 6 6 4 2 2 FYA 1 8 P2 P2 P2 P2 P4 P8 2 1 3 4 7 8 5 6 Ring 1 Ring 2 SR 434 Michael Blake Bl Seq 3 Ring 1 Ring 2 SR 434 S Cabinet Seq 1 Ring 1 Ring 2 SR 434 Michael Blake Bl Seq 2 N Signal turned on 8/22/2024. Intersection setup with split sides.Intersection coordination added by FDOT. Phases 1 and 5 are Flashing Yellow Arrows.Pattern 25 used during PM rush to help manage the amount of veh/ped traffic. Intersection Notes T.O.D Notes Track Overlap Dwell Phase Dwell Overlap Exit PhaseTrack Phase 382 Appendix G Projected Intersection Volume Calculations 383 Project No. Intersection Volumes By 3 Factors Pass By Tgen Analysis Period SF AGR Enter Exit Enter Exit Legend AM Peak 1.01 0.00% 24 24 16 16 Existing + [Passby] + (Project) = Total Intersection: SR 434 & Tuskawilla Road 1 App Mvmt Lns Raw SF Adjusted PBIn PBOut Passby ProjIn ProjOut Project BldOut Volumes L 2 488 1.01 493 0% 0%0 0% 0%0 493 493 NB T 1 74 1.01 75 10% 0%2 10% 0%27975+ [2]+ (2) = 79 R 0 113 1.01 114 30% 0%7 30% 0%5 126 114+ [7]+ (5) = 126 L0921.01 93 0% 0%0 0% 0%09393 SB T 2 101 1.01 102 0% 10%2 0% 10%2 106 102+ [2]+ (2) = 106 R0271.01 27 0% 20%5 0% 20%33527+ [5]+ (3) = 35 L1471.01 47 20% 0%6 20% 0%25547+ [6]+ (2) = 55 EB T 2 1116 1.01 1,127 0% 0%0 0% 0%0 1127 1127 R 1 500 1.01 505 0% 0%0 0% 0%0 505 505 L 1 183 1.01 185 0% 20%5 0% 20%3 193 185+ [5]+ (3) = 193 WB T 2 1133 1.01 1,144 0% 10%2 0% 10%2 1148 1144+[2]+ (2) = 1148 R0261.01 26 0% 0%0 0% 0%02626 Intersection: SR 434 & Eagle Edge Lane 2 ApproMvmt Lns Raw SF Adjusted PBIn PBOut Passby ProjIn ProjOut Project BldOut Formula L0 01.01 0 0% 0%0 0% 0%000 NB T 0 0 1.01 0 0% 0%0 0% 0%000 R0 01.01 0 0% 0%0 0% 0%000 L0 01.01 0 0% 0%0 0% 0%000 SB T 0 0 1.01 0 0% 0%0 0% 0%000 R1711.01 72 0% 10%2 0% 10%27672+ [2]+(2) = 76 L0 01.01 0 0% 0%0 0% 0%000 EB T 2 1294 1.01 1,307 30% 0%7 30% 0%5 1319 1307+[7]+ (5) = 1319 R0 01.01 0 0% 0%0 0% 0%000 L0 01.01 0 0% 0%0 0% 0%000 WB T 2 1331 1.01 1,344 0% 20%5 0% 20%3 1352 1344+[5]+ (3) = 1352 R0111.01 11 10% 0%2 10% 0%21511+[2]+(2) = 15 Intersection: SR 434 & Michael Blake Boulevard 3 ApproMvmt Lns Raw SF Adjusted PBIn PBOut Passby ProjIn ProjOut Project BldOut Formula L1 51.01 5 0% 0%0 0% 0%055 NB T 1 6 1.01 6 0% 0%0 0% 0%066 R0691.01 70 0% 0%0 0% 0%07070 L 0 184 1.01 186 0% 40%10 0% 40%6 202 186+[10]+(6) = 202 SB T 1 39 1.01 39 0% 0%0 0% 0%03939 R1691.01 70 0% 20%5 0% 20%37870+ [5]+ (3) = 78 L1871.01 88 30% 0%7 30% 0%5 100 88+ [7]+(5) = 100 EB T 2 1190 1.01 1,202 0% 0%0 0% 0%0 1202 1202 R0131.01 13 0% 0%0 0% 0%01313 L1711.01 72 0% 0%0 0% 0%07272 WB T 2 1268 1.01 1,281 10% 0%2 10% 0%2 1285 1281+[2]+ (2) = 1285 R1751.01 76 30% 0%7 30% 0%58876+[7]+ (5) = 88 25124.01.01 IntVol‐AM Page 1 384 Project No. Intersection Volumes By 1 Factors Pass By Tgen Analysis Period SF AGR Enter Exit Enter Exit Legend PM Peak 1.01 0.00% 10 10 5 5 Existing + [Passby] + (Project) = Total Intersection: SR 434 & Tuskawilla Road 1 App Mvmt Lns Raw SF Adjusted PBIn PBOut Passby ProjIn ProjOut Project BldOut Formula L 2 483 1.01 488 0% 0%0 0% 0%0 488 488 NB T 1 153 1.01 155 10% 0%1 0% 0%0 156 155+ [1]+ = 156 R 0 106 1.01 107 30% 0%3 45% 0%2 112 107+ [3]+ (2) = 112 L 0 111 1.01 112 0% 0%0 0% 0%0 112 112 SB T 2 187 1.01 189 0% 10%1 0% 0%0 190 189+ [1]+ = 190 R0 271.01 27 0% 20%2 0% 10%13027+ [2]+ (1) = 30 L1701.01 71 20% 0%2 10% 0%17471+ [2]+ (1) = 74 EB T 2 1328 1.01 1,341 0% 0%0 0% 0%0 1341 1341 R 1 594 1.01 600 0% 0%0 0% 0%0 600 600 L 1 146 1.01 147 0% 20%2 0% 45%2 151 147+ [2]+ (2) = 151 WB T 2 1259 1.01 1,272 0% 10%1 0% 0%0 1273 1272[1]+ = 1273 R0 241.01 24 0% 0%0 0% 0%02424 Intersection: SR 434 & Eagle Edge Lane 2 ApproMvmt Lns Raw SF Adjusted PBIn PBOut Passby ProjIn ProjOut Project BldOut Formula L0 01.01 0 0% 0%0 0% 0%000 NB T 0 0 1.01 0 0% 0%0 0% 0%000 R0 01.01 0 0% 0%0 0% 0%000 L0 01.01 0 0% 0%0 0% 0%000 SB T 0 0 1.01 0 0% 0%0 0% 0%000 R1 301.01 30 0% 10%1 0% 0%03130+[1]+ = 31 L0 01.01 0 0% 0%0 0% 0%000 EB T 2 1539 1.01 1,554 30% 0%3 45% 0%2 1559 1554+[3]+ (2) = 1559 R0 01.01 0 0% 0%0 0% 0%000 L0 01.01 0 0% 0%0 0% 0%000 WB T 2 1403 1.01 1,417 0% 20%2 0% 45%2 1421 1417+[2]+ (2) = 1421 R0 121.01 12 10% 0%1 0% 0%01312+[1] = 13 Intersection: SR 434 & Michael Blake Boulevard 3 ApproMvmt Lns Raw SF Adjusted PBIn PBOut Passby ProjIn ProjOut Project BldOut Formula L1 21.01 2 0% 0%0 0% 0%022 NB T 1 5 1.01 5 0% 0%0 0% 0%055 R0 711.01 72 0% 0%0 0% 0%07272 L0941.01 95 0% 40%4 0% 45%2 101 95+[4]+(2) = 101 SB T 1 10 1.01 10 0% 0%0 0% 0%01010 R1 271.01 27 0% 20%2 0% 45%23127+ [2]+ (2) = 31 L 1 100 1.01 101 30% 0%3 45% 0%2 106 101+ [3]+(2) = 106 EB T 2 1419 1.01 1,433 0% 0%0 0% 0%0 1433 1433 R0 161.01 16 0% 0%0 0% 0%01616 L1481.01 48 0% 0%0 0% 0%04848 WB T 2 1386 1.01 1,400 10% 0%1 0% 0%0 1401 1400+[1] = 1401 R 1 124 1.01 125 30% 0%3 45% 0%2 130 125+[3]+ (2) = 130 25124.01.01 IntVol‐PM Page 2 385 Appendix H HCM Analysis Sheets 386 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Tuskawilla Road & SR 434 09/09/2025 AM Peak Existing Synchro 12 Report Movement NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h)493 75 114 93 102 27 47 1127 505 185 1144 26 Future Volume (veh/h)493 75 114 93 102 27 47 1127 505 185 1144 26 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width Adj.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 503 77 116 95 104 28 48 1150 515 189 1167 27 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 578 113 170 116 127 34 352 1683 751 204 1386 32 Arrive On Green 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.20 0.47 0.47 0.23 0.78 0.78 Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 673 1014 1502 1642 442 1781 3554 1585 1781 3550 82 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 503 0 193 114 0 113 48 1150 515 189 584 610 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1728 0 1688 1795 0 1791 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1856 Q Serve(g_s), s 27.0 0.0 20.4 11.8 0.0 11.9 4.2 47.9 48.1 19.7 39.9 39.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 27.0 0.0 20.4 11.8 0.0 11.9 4.2 47.9 48.1 19.7 39.9 39.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.60 0.84 0.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.04 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 578 0 282 139 0 138 352 1683 751 204 694 725 V/C Ratio(X)0.87 0.00 0.68 0.82 0.00 0.82 0.14 0.68 0.69 0.93 0.84 0.84 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 911 0 445 214 0 214 352 1683 751 218 694 725 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 77.1 0.0 74.4 86.4 0.0 86.4 62.8 38.9 39.0 72.4 17.0 17.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.7 0.0 2.9 13.3 0.0 13.5 0.2 2.3 5.1 39.7 11.8 11.4 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 18.1 0.0 14.0 10.1 0.0 10.1 3.5 28.7 26.8 15.6 15.0 15.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 82.8 0.0 77.3 99.7 0.0 99.8 63.0 41.2 44.1 112.1 28.9 28.4 LnGrp LOS F E F F E D D F C C Approach Vol, veh/h 696 227 1713 1383 Approach Delay, s/veh 81.3 99.7 42.7 40.1 Approach LOS F F D D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 29.6 97.8 22.0 45.4 82.0 40.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 7.8 7.8 7.3 7.8 7.8 8.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 23.2 62.2 22.7 11.2 74.2 50.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 21.7 50.1 13.9 6.2 41.9 29.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 7.2 0.8 0.0 8.6 2.8 Intersection Summary HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 51.7 HCM 7th LOS D Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. 387 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Tuskawilla Road & SR 434 09/09/2025 AM Peak Buildout Synchro 12 Report Movement NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h)493 79 126 93 106 35 55 1127 505 193 1148 26 Future Volume (veh/h)493 79 126 93 106 35 55 1127 505 193 1148 26 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width Adj.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 503 81 129 95 108 36 56 1150 515 197 1171 27 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 579 109 173 115 130 43 345 1653 737 212 1387 32 Arrive On Green 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.19 0.47 0.47 0.24 0.78 0.78 Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 650 1035 1426 1611 536 1781 3554 1585 1781 3551 82 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 503 0 210 120 0 119 56 1150 515 197 586 612 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1728 0 1684 1799 0 1774 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1856 Q Serve(g_s), s 26.9 0.0 22.5 12.5 0.0 12.6 5.0 48.6 48.9 20.6 40.3 40.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 26.9 0.0 22.5 12.5 0.0 12.6 5.0 48.6 48.9 20.6 40.3 40.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.61 0.79 0.30 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.04 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 579 0 282 146 0 144 345 1653 737 212 694 725 V/C Ratio(X)0.87 0.00 0.74 0.82 0.00 0.83 0.16 0.70 0.70 0.93 0.84 0.84 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 911 0 444 215 0 212 345 1653 737 218 694 725 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 77.0 0.0 75.2 86.0 0.0 86.0 63.8 40.2 40.3 71.6 17.1 17.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.6 0.0 3.9 14.8 0.0 15.8 0.2 2.4 5.4 41.5 12.0 11.6 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 18.1 0.0 15.2 10.7 0.0 10.7 4.1 29.1 27.2 16.2 15.1 15.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 82.6 0.0 79.1 100.8 0.0 101.8 64.0 42.6 45.7 113.1 29.1 28.7 LnGrp LOS F E F F E D D F C C Approach Vol, veh/h 713 239 1721 1395 Approach Delay, s/veh 81.5 101.3 44.3 40.8 Approach LOS F F D D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 30.4 96.2 22.7 44.6 82.0 40.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 7.8 7.8 7.3 7.8 7.8 8.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 23.2 62.2 22.7 11.2 74.2 50.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 22.6 50.9 14.6 7.0 42.3 28.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 6.9 0.8 0.0 8.6 2.9 Intersection Summary HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 53.0 HCM 7th LOS D Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. 388 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Tuskawilla Road & SR 434 09/09/2025 PM Peak Existing Synchro 12 Report Movement NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h)488 155 107 112 189 27 71 1341 600 147 1272 24 Future Volume (veh/h)488 155 107 112 189 27 71 1341 600 147 1272 24 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width Adj.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 525 167 115 120 203 29 76 1442 645 158 1368 26 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 604 180 124 136 230 33 91 1680 749 174 1852 35 Arrive On Green 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.05 0.47 0.47 0.13 0.69 0.69 Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 1032 711 1235 2091 299 1781 3554 1585 1781 3567 68 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 525 0 282 176 0 176 76 1442 645 158 681 713 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1728 0 1742 1809 0 1817 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1858 Q Serve(g_s), s 32.5 0.0 35.0 21.1 0.0 21.0 9.3 79.2 79.6 19.2 53.2 53.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 32.5 0.0 35.0 21.1 0.0 21.0 9.3 79.2 79.6 19.2 53.2 53.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.41 0.68 0.16 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.04 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 604 0 305 199 0 200 91 1680 749 174 923 965 V/C Ratio(X)0.87 0.00 0.93 0.88 0.00 0.88 0.83 0.86 0.86 0.91 0.74 0.74 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 646 0 326 244 0 245 172 1680 749 261 923 965 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.33 1.33 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 88.3 0.0 89.3 96.5 0.0 96.5 103.4 51.5 51.6 94.7 24.6 24.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 11.6 0.0 30.4 25.7 0.0 25.4 17.2 5.9 12.4 24.3 5.3 5.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 21.9 0.0 25.4 17.0 0.0 17.1 8.3 46.0 43.3 15.0 28.6 29.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 99.9 0.0 119.7 122.2 0.0 121.8 120.6 57.4 64.0 119.0 29.9 29.7 LnGrp LOS F F F F F E E F C C Approach Vol, veh/h 807 352 2163 1552 Approach Delay, s/veh 106.8 122.0 61.6 38.9 Approach LOS F F E D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 29.3 111.8 31.5 19.1 122.0 47.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 7.8 7.8 7.3 7.8 7.8 8.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 32.2 85.2 29.7 21.2 96.2 41.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 21.2 81.6 23.1 11.3 55.4 37.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 3.1 1.1 0.1 11.7 1.4 Intersection Summary HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 66.2 HCM 7th LOS E Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. 389 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Tuskawilla Road & SR 434 09/09/2025 PM Peak Buildout Synchro 12 Report Movement NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h)488 156 112 112 190 30 74 1341 600 151 1273 24 Future Volume (veh/h)488 156 112 112 190 30 74 1341 600 151 1273 24 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width Adj.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 525 168 120 120 204 32 80 1442 645 162 1369 26 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 614 180 129 136 231 36 96 1658 740 178 1830 35 Arrive On Green 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.05 0.47 0.47 0.13 0.68 0.68 Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 1015 725 1220 2075 326 1781 3554 1585 1781 3567 68 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 525 0 288 178 0 178 80 1442 645 162 681 714 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1728 0 1740 1809 0 1812 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1858 Q Serve(g_s), s 32.4 0.0 35.9 21.3 0.0 21.3 9.8 80.1 80.5 19.7 54.7 54.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 32.4 0.0 35.9 21.3 0.0 21.3 9.8 80.1 80.5 19.7 54.7 54.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.42 0.67 0.18 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.04 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 614 0 309 201 0 201 96 1658 740 178 912 953 V/C Ratio(X)0.86 0.00 0.93 0.88 0.00 0.88 0.84 0.87 0.87 0.91 0.75 0.75 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 646 0 325 244 0 245 172 1658 740 261 912 953 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.33 1.33 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 87.7 0.0 89.1 96.4 0.0 96.4 103.2 52.7 52.8 94.4 25.7 25.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 10.5 0.0 32.0 26.2 0.0 26.1 17.0 6.5 13.4 25.3 5.6 5.4 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 21.8 0.0 26.0 17.3 0.0 17.3 8.7 46.7 43.9 15.4 29.5 30.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 98.2 0.0 121.1 122.6 0.0 122.5 120.2 59.2 66.2 119.7 31.3 31.1 LnGrp LOS F F F F F E E F C C Approach Vol, veh/h 813 356 2167 1557 Approach Delay, s/veh 106.3 122.6 63.5 40.4 Approach LOS F F E D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 29.8 110.5 31.7 19.6 120.7 48.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 7.8 7.8 7.3 7.8 7.8 8.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 32.2 85.2 29.7 21.2 96.2 41.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 21.7 82.5 23.3 11.8 56.8 37.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 2.3 1.1 0.1 11.6 1.2 Intersection Summary HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 67.6 HCM 7th LOS E Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. 390 HCM 7th TWSC 2: SR 434 & Eagle Edge Lane 09/09/2025 AM Peak Existing Synchro 12 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement SEL SET NWT NWR SWL SWR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 1307 1344 11 0 72 Future Vol, veh/h 0 1307 1344 11 0 72 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized -None -None -None Storage Length -----0 Veh in Median Storage, #-0 0 -0 - Grade, %-0 0 -0 - Peak Hour Factor 99 99 99 99 99 99 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 1320 1358 11 0 73 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All -0 -0 -684 Stage 1 ------ Stage 2 ------ Critical Hdwy -----6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ------ Critical Hdwy Stg 2 ------ Follow-up Hdwy -----3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 ---0 391 Stage 1 0 ---0 - Stage 2 0 ---0 - Platoon blocked, %--- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver -----391 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ------ Stage 1 ------ Stage 2 ------ Approach SE NW SW HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0 16.3 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWT NWR SETSWLn1 Capacity (veh/h)---391 HCM Lane V/C Ratio ---0.186 HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v)---16.3 HCM Lane LOS ---C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)---0.7 391 HCM 7th TWSC 2: SR 434 & Eagle Edge Lane 09/09/2025 AM Peak Buildout Synchro 12 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.5 Movement SEL SET NWT NWR SWL SWR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 1319 1352 15 0 76 Future Vol, veh/h 0 1319 1352 15 0 76 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized -None -None -None Storage Length -----0 Veh in Median Storage, #-0 0 -0 - Grade, %-0 0 -0 - Peak Hour Factor 99 99 99 99 99 99 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 1332 1366 15 0 77 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All -0 -0 -690 Stage 1 ------ Stage 2 ------ Critical Hdwy -----6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ------ Critical Hdwy Stg 2 ------ Follow-up Hdwy -----3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 ---0 387 Stage 1 0 ---0 - Stage 2 0 ---0 - Platoon blocked, %--- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver -----387 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ------ Stage 1 ------ Stage 2 ------ Approach SE NW SW HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0 16.58 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWT NWR SETSWLn1 Capacity (veh/h)---387 HCM Lane V/C Ratio ---0.198 HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v)---16.6 HCM Lane LOS ---C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)---0.7 392 HCM 7th TWSC 2: SR 434 & Eagle Edge Lane 09/09/2025 PM Peak Existing Synchro 12 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement SEL SET NWT NWR SWL SWR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 1554 1417 12 0 30 Future Vol, veh/h 0 1554 1417 12 0 30 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized -None -None -None Storage Length -----0 Veh in Median Storage, #-0 0 -0 - Grade, %-0 0 -0 - Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 1746 1592 13 0 34 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All -0 -0 -803 Stage 1 ------ Stage 2 ------ Critical Hdwy -----6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ------ Critical Hdwy Stg 2 ------ Follow-up Hdwy -----3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 ---0 327 Stage 1 0 ---0 - Stage 2 0 ---0 - Platoon blocked, %--- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver -----327 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ------ Stage 1 ------ Stage 2 ------ Approach SE NW SW HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0 17.29 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWT NWR SETSWLn1 Capacity (veh/h)---327 HCM Lane V/C Ratio ---0.103 HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v)---17.3 HCM Lane LOS ---C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)---0.3 393 HCM 7th TWSC 2: SR 434 & Eagle Edge Lane 09/09/2025 PM Peak Buildout Synchro 12 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement SEL SET NWT NWR SWL SWR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 1559 1421 13 0 31 Future Vol, veh/h 0 1559 1421 13 0 31 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized -None -None -None Storage Length -----0 Veh in Median Storage, #-0 0 -0 - Grade, %-0 0 -0 - Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 1752 1597 15 0 35 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All -0 -0 -806 Stage 1 ------ Stage 2 ------ Critical Hdwy -----6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ------ Critical Hdwy Stg 2 ------ Follow-up Hdwy -----3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 ---0 325 Stage 1 0 ---0 - Stage 2 0 ---0 - Platoon blocked, %--- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver -----325 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ------ Stage 1 ------ Stage 2 ------ Approach SE NW SW HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0 17.4 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NWT NWR SETSWLn1 Capacity (veh/h)---325 HCM Lane V/C Ratio ---0.107 HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v)---17.4 HCM Lane LOS ---C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)---0.4 394 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 3: Michael Blake Boulevard & SR 434 09/09/2025 AM Peak Existing Synchro 12 Report Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h)88 1202 13 72 1281 76 5 6 70 186 39 70 Future Volume (veh/h)88 1202 13 72 1281 76 5 6 70 186 39 70 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width Adj.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 90 1227 13 73 1307 78 5 6 71 190 40 71 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 407 2181 23 374 1668 744 105 7 87 204 43 218 Arrive On Green 0.34 1.00 1.00 0.04 0.47 0.47 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.14 0.14 0.14 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3602 38 1781 3554 1585 1781 125 1479 1484 312 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 90 605 635 73 1307 78 5 0 77 230 0 71 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1863 1781 1777 1585 1781 0 1604 1796 0 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 58.6 5.2 0.5 0.0 9.0 24.1 0.0 7.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 58.6 5.2 0.5 0.0 9.0 24.1 0.0 7.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 407 1076 1128 374 1668 744 105 0 94 247 0 218 V/C Ratio(X)0.22 0.56 0.56 0.20 0.78 0.10 0.05 0.00 0.82 0.93 0.00 0.33 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 407 1076 1128 471 1668 744 248 0 223 250 0 220 HCM Platoon Ratio 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 41.0 0.0 0.0 12.7 42.3 28.1 84.4 0.0 88.4 81.1 0.0 74.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 2.1 2.0 0.3 3.8 0.3 0.2 0.0 15.4 38.6 0.0 0.9 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 5.0 1.1 1.1 2.1 34.5 3.7 0.4 0.0 7.6 20.1 0.0 5.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 41.2 2.1 2.0 13.0 46.1 28.4 84.6 0.0 103.8 119.6 0.0 74.8 LnGrp LOS D A A B D C F F F E Approach Vol, veh/h 1330 1458 82 301 Approach Delay, s/veh 4.7 43.5 102.6 109.1 Approach LOS A D F F Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.7 122.8 33.7 40.5 97.0 18.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 7.8 7.8 7.6 7.8 7.8 7.6 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 17.2 89.2 26.4 17.2 89.2 26.4 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.9 2.0 26.1 2.0 60.6 11.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 10.1 0.1 0.2 10.9 0.3 Intersection Summary HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 35.0 HCM 7th LOS C Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. 395 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 3: Michael Blake Boulevard & SR 434 09/09/2025 AM Peak Buildout Synchro 12 Report Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h)100 1202 13 72 1285 88 5 6 70 202 39 78 Future Volume (veh/h)100 1202 13 72 1285 88 5 6 70 202 39 78 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width Adj.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 102 1227 13 73 1311 90 5 6 71 206 40 80 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 403 2176 23 373 1668 744 105 7 87 209 41 220 Arrive On Green 0.34 1.00 1.00 0.04 0.47 0.47 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.14 0.14 0.14 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3602 38 1781 3554 1585 1781 125 1479 1503 292 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 102 605 635 73 1311 90 5 0 77 246 0 80 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1863 1781 1777 1585 1781 0 1604 1795 0 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 58.9 6.1 0.5 0.0 9.0 26.0 0.0 8.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 58.9 6.1 0.5 0.0 9.0 26.0 0.0 8.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.84 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 403 1073 1126 373 1668 744 105 0 94 249 0 220 V/C Ratio(X)0.25 0.56 0.56 0.20 0.79 0.12 0.05 0.00 0.82 0.99 0.00 0.36 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 403 1073 1126 470 1668 744 248 0 223 249 0 220 HCM Platoon Ratio 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 42.8 0.0 0.0 12.8 42.4 28.3 84.4 0.0 88.4 81.6 0.0 74.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 2.1 2.0 0.3 3.8 0.3 0.2 0.0 15.4 53.0 0.0 1.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 5.9 1.2 1.2 2.2 34.6 4.3 0.4 0.0 7.6 22.4 0.0 6.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 43.1 2.1 2.0 13.1 46.2 28.7 84.6 0.0 103.8 134.6 0.0 75.2 LnGrp LOS D A A B D C F F F E Approach Vol, veh/h 1342 1474 82 326 Approach Delay, s/veh 5.2 43.5 102.6 120.0 Approach LOS A D F F Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.7 122.6 34.0 40.2 97.0 18.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 7.8 7.8 7.6 7.8 7.8 7.6 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 17.2 89.2 26.4 17.2 89.2 26.4 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.9 2.0 28.0 2.0 60.9 11.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 10.1 0.0 0.2 11.0 0.3 Intersection Summary HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 36.8 HCM 7th LOS D Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. 396 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 3: Michael Blake Boulevard & SR 434 09/09/2025 PM Peak Existing Synchro 12 Report Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h)101 1433 16 48 1400 125 2 5 72 95 10 27 Future Volume (veh/h)101 1433 16 48 1400 125 2 5 72 95 10 27 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width Adj.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 112 1592 18 53 1556 139 2 6 80 106 11 30 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 462 2483 28 304 1764 787 113 7 95 123 13 120 Arrive On Green 0.45 1.00 1.00 0.03 0.50 0.50 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.08 0.08 0.08 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3599 41 1781 3554 1585 1781 112 1490 1621 168 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 112 785 825 53 1556 139 2 0 86 117 0 30 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1863 1781 1777 1585 1781 0 1602 1789 0 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 86.3 10.7 0.2 0.0 11.7 14.2 0.0 3.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 86.3 10.7 0.2 0.0 11.7 14.2 0.0 3.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 0.91 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 462 1226 1285 304 1764 787 113 0 102 136 0 120 V/C Ratio(X)0.24 0.64 0.64 0.17 0.88 0.18 0.02 0.00 0.84 0.86 0.00 0.25 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 462 1226 1285 430 1764 787 246 0 221 223 0 197 HCM Platoon Ratio 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 44.0 0.0 0.0 8.9 49.6 30.6 96.6 0.0 101.9 100.5 0.0 95.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 2.6 2.5 0.3 6.8 0.5 0.1 0.0 16.7 16.5 0.0 1.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 6.4 1.6 1.6 1.4 49.6 7.6 0.2 0.0 9.3 11.8 0.0 3.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 44.3 2.6 2.5 9.1 56.4 31.1 96.6 0.0 118.6 117.0 0.0 96.8 LnGrp LOS D A A A E C F F F F Approach Vol, veh/h 1722 1748 88 147 Approach Delay, s/veh 5.2 53.0 118.1 112.9 Approach LOS A D F F Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.5 159.6 24.3 57.1 117.0 21.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 7.8 7.8 7.6 7.8 7.8 7.6 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 22.2 109.2 27.4 22.2 109.2 30.4 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.9 2.0 16.2 2.0 88.3 13.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 17.5 0.5 0.2 11.9 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 34.7 HCM 7th LOS C Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. 397 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 3: Michael Blake Boulevard & SR 434 09/09/2025 PM Peak Buildout Synchro 12 Report Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h)106 1433 16 48 1401 130 2 5 72 101 10 31 Future Volume (veh/h)106 1433 16 48 1401 130 2 5 72 101 10 31 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width Adj.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 118 1592 18 53 1557 144 2 6 80 112 11 34 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 456 2471 28 303 1764 787 113 7 95 129 13 126 Arrive On Green 0.44 1.00 1.00 0.03 0.50 0.50 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.08 0.08 0.08 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3599 41 1781 3554 1585 1781 112 1490 1629 160 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 118 785 825 53 1557 144 2 0 86 123 0 34 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1863 1781 1777 1585 1781 0 1602 1789 0 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.5 0.0 0.0 1.9 86.4 11.1 0.2 0.0 11.7 15.0 0.0 4.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.5 0.0 0.0 1.9 86.4 11.1 0.2 0.0 11.7 15.0 0.0 4.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 0.91 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 456 1220 1279 303 1764 787 113 0 102 142 0 126 V/C Ratio(X)0.26 0.64 0.64 0.17 0.88 0.18 0.02 0.00 0.84 0.87 0.00 0.27 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 456 1220 1279 429 1764 787 246 0 221 223 0 197 HCM Platoon Ratio 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 45.0 0.0 0.0 9.1 49.7 30.7 96.6 0.0 101.9 100.1 0.0 95.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 2.6 2.5 0.3 6.8 0.5 0.1 0.0 16.7 18.7 0.0 1.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 6.8 1.6 1.6 1.4 49.7 7.9 0.2 0.0 9.3 12.4 0.0 3.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 45.3 2.6 2.5 9.4 56.5 31.2 96.6 0.0 118.6 118.8 0.0 96.4 LnGrp LOS D A A A E C F F F F Approach Vol, veh/h 1728 1754 88 157 Approach Delay, s/veh 5.5 53.0 118.1 113.9 Approach LOS A D F F Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.5 158.8 25.1 56.3 117.0 21.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 7.8 7.8 7.6 7.8 7.8 7.6 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 22.2 109.2 27.4 22.2 109.2 30.4 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.9 2.0 17.0 2.5 88.4 13.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 17.5 0.5 0.3 11.9 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 35.1 HCM 7th LOS D Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. 398 Appendix I Queue Analysis 399 Black Bird Coffee – Queuing Analysis & Sight Distance Analysis October 22, 2021 P a g e | 4 2. DATA COLLECTION HBC collected data at three similar surrogate sites in the area to determine the possible queueing of the Blackbird Coffee & Energy. The following three sites are as follows: • Dunkin Donuts: 10880 Biscayne Boulevard • Starbucks: 12000 Biscayne Boulevard • Starbucks: 13503 Biscayne Boulevard Six (6) field visits were performed to collect queue data at the three surrogate sites to determine the maximum queue for AM and PM Periods. The data was collected for AM peak period between 7 AM and 9 AM and PM Peak period between 4 PM and 6 PM. Table 2-1 shows the observed queues for the three surrogate sites during AM and PM peak hours. The maximum queue in the morning period was observed to be ten (10) vehicles at 10880 Biscayne Boulevard, ten (10) vehicles at 12000 Biscayne Boulevard, and eight (8) vehicles at 13503 Biscayne Boulevard. For the afternoon period, the maximum queue was three (3) vehicles, five (5) vehicles, and six (6) vehicles for 10880 Biscayne Boulevard, 12000 Biscayne Boulevard, and 13503 Biscayne Boulevard, respectively. 400 Black Bird Coffee – Queuing Analysis & Sight Distance Analysis October 22, 2021 P a g e | 5 Table 2-1: Surrogate Sites Observed Queues Time 10880 Biscayne Blvd 12000 Biscayne Blvd 13503 Biscayne Blvd Time 10880 Biscayne Blvd 12000 Biscayne Blvd 13503 Biscayne Blvd 7:00:00 AM 5 3 3 4:00:00 PM 3 1 3 7:05:00 AM 4 4 2 4:05:00 PM 2 1 2 7:10:00 AM 7 4 3 4:10:00 PM 1 0 4 7:15:00 AM 6 2 3 4:15:00 PM 1 3 5 7:20:00 AM 3 0 1 4:20:00 PM 0 2 4 7:25:00 AM 3 6 3 4:25:00 PM 1 1 4 7:30:00 AM 4 1 8 4:30:00 PM 3 4 0 7:35:00 AM 6 5 7 4:35:00 PM 0 0 1 7:40:00 AM 9 4 7 4:40:00 PM 1 2 3 7:45:00 AM 2 1 6 4:45:00 PM 2 0 2 7:50:00 AM 4 3 4 4:50:00 PM 1 0 3 7:55:00 AM 8 1 2 4:55:00 PM 1 0 4 Vehicle/hr 100 80 89 Vehicle/hr 28 32 50 8:00:00 AM 10 4 8 5:00:00 PM 0 3 3 8:05:00 AM 6 4 5 5:05:00 PM 2 5 6 8:10:00 AM 3 6 8 5:10:00 PM 1 4 5 8:15:00 AM 4 2 4 5:15:00 PM 0 3 2 8:20:00 AM 3 3 0 5:20:00 PM 1 0 2 8:25:00 AM 6 4 0 5:25:00 PM 2 0 2 8:30:00 AM 5 8 5 5:30:00 PM 1 1 1 8:35:00 AM 6 10 5 5:35:00 PM 0 1 0 8:40:00 AM 7 9 4 5:40:00 PM 0 2 3 8:45:00 AM 6 7 3 5:45:00 PM 0 2 6 8:50:00 AM 5 8 5 5:50:00 PM 0 1 5 8:55:00 AM 5 8 4 5:55:00 PM 0 2 6 Vehicle/hr 109 115 80 Vehicle/hr 24 38 59 401 Black Bird Coffee – Queuing Analysis & Sight Distance Analysis October 22, 2021 P a g e | 6 3. QUEUING ANALYSIS 3.1 Maximum Queue Calculation A queuing analysis was performed to ensure there is no vehicle queuing onto Biscayne Boulevard from the proposed coffee shop drive-thru. This analysis was performed for the AM and PM peak hours. The most applicable land-use type for a drive-thru coffee/doughnut shop is LUC 937, Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window. Based on the trip generation rates for LUC 937, the proposed site is estimated to generate 60 trips during the AM peak hour, and 29 trips during the PM peak hour. The maximum queue calculation for Blackbird Coffee & Energy for AM and PM peak hours are shown in Table 3-1 and Table 3-2, respectively. The results showed that the maximum queue at Blackbird Coffee & Energy will be 6 vehicles during AM peak hours and 4 vehicles during PM peak hours. Table 3-1: Maximum Queue for Morning Peak Hours 10880 Biscayne Boulevard 12000 Biscayne Boulevard 13503 Biscayne Boulevard 7:00 AM to 8:00 AM Vehicle/hr (V) 100 80 89 Maximum Queue (Q) 9 6 8 Q/V 0.09 0.075 0.09 8:00 AM to 9:00 AM Vehicle/hr (V) 109 115 80 Maximum Queue (Q) 10 10 8 Q/V 0.092 0.087 0.10 Maximum Q/V 0.1 Blackbird Trips (Trip Generation) 60 Blackbird Drive-thru Maximum Queue 6.0 Table 3-2: Maximum Queue for Afternoon Peak Hours 10880 Biscayne Boulevard 12000 Biscayne Boulevard 13503 Biscayne Boulevard 4:00 PM to 5:00 PM Vehicle/hr (V) 28 32 50 Maximum Queue (Q) 3 4 5 Q/V 0.107 0.125 0.1 5:00 PM to 6:00 PM Vehicle/hr (V) 24 38 59 Maximum Queue (Q) 3 5 6 Q/V 0.125 0.132 0.10 Maximum Q/V 0.132 Blackbird Trips (Trip Generation) 29 Blackbird Drive-thru Maximum Queue 3.8 402 Black Bird Coffee – Queuing Analysis & Sight Distance Analysis October 22, 2021 P a g e | 7 The site plan of the proposed “Blackbird Coffee & Energy” includes vehicular access storage capacity of approximately nine (9) vehicles without blocking parking spaces (Figure 3-1). This storage capacity is in excess of the queues observed at the surrogate sites. The results of the analysis showed that the proposed Blackbird Coffee & Energy drive-thru has more capacity than needed to meet the projected vehicular demand, therefore no queuing is expected outside the site’s entrances. Figure 3-1: On-Site Stacking 403 Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Survey, Planning & Program Management 2600 NE 11th St Bldg 300 Bentonville, AR 72712 Office: 479.273.9472 Toll-free: 1.800.433.4173 ceieng.com October 27, 2025 City of Winter Springs Community Development Department 1126 East State Rd 434 Winter Springs, FL 32708 407.327.1800 Re: 7Brew Coffee Shop – Parking Justification 1248 E SR 434 Winter Springs, FL 32708 Planning Staff, CEI Engineering Associates, Inc presents the following analysis and justification for the anticipated parking needs for the proposed 7Brew Drive-Through Coffee Shop project located at 1248 E SR 434 in Winter Springs, FL. The site is located within the T-5 Town Center Zoning District. Developments within the Town Center District do not have a specific parking ratio requirement and require a statement of justification for the amount of parking spaces proposed This justification provides a comparison between the City’s code-required parking for this land use as well as the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Parking Generation Manual 5th Edition. The proposed 7Brew is a 510sqft coffee shop that utilizes drive-through only customer service with dual drive-through lanes and employee only parking. No on-site patron seating or consumption areas are provided. City Code-Required Parking There is not a use directly specific to a Restaurant with Drive-Through Window and No Seating; however, the closest associated use for the site per Sec. 9-277 of City Code is for general Restaurant Use (Sec. 9-277.26). The calculated required parking for this use is listed in Table 1 below. Table 1 Use per Code Sec. 9-277 Code Requirements Total Parking Required Restaurants One (1) parking space for each one hundred (100) square feet of floor space for patron use in the building. (0 Patrons) + 510sqft / 100 = 6 required spaces 404 2 The proposed development is consistent with ITE Trip Generation Land Use Code 938 Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-through Window and No Indoor Seating. The ITE Parking Generation Manual does not include this specific land use because customers do not have a reason to park their vehicles; however, The ITE Parking Generation Manual 5th Edition includes “Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window” as a closer defined use (Land Use Code 937). The calculated required parking for that use is listed in Table 2 below: Table 2 ITE Land Use Code 937 Code Requirements Total Parking Required Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window Average Supply Ratio is 8.8 spaces per 1,000sqft ground floor area (GFA). 510sqft GFA (510*8.8)/1000 = 4.48spaces) = 5 required spaces Conclusion Upon review of the City Code and ITE Parking Generation Manual 5th Edition, the proposed parking supply of five (5) will be sufficient for parking demand at the proposed 7Brew Drive-Through Coffee Shop. Respectfully Submitted, Erin Dudley Project Manager edudley@ceieng.com CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. Firm: 6428 Jeffrey Geurian, P.E. President/CEO jgeurian@ceieng.com CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. Firm: 6428 405 Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Survey, Planning & Program Management 3030 LBJ Freeway, Suite 920 Dallas, TX 75234 Office: 972.488.3737 Toll-free: 1.877.488.3737 ceieng.com March 12, 2025 City of Winter Springs Community Development Department 1126 East State Rd 434 Winter Springs, FL 32708 407.327.1800 Re: 7Brew Coffee Shop – Letter of Intent E Florida 434 and Michael Blake Blvd. Winter Springs, FL 32708 Planning Department, On behalf of Tuskawilla Retail Partners, LLC c/o Catalyst Development Partners and subsequent lease holder, 7Venture, LLC, CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. is reaching out to respectfully present for your review, our submittal for a Development Agreement Application for a newly proposed commercial development. The proposed site is located within the T-5 Urban Center zoning designation which is comprised of the core of the Town Center and is synonymous with the City’s Urban Central Business District. It is understood that this designation shall consist of a higher intensity mix of uses. Currently, the site is a vacant parcel within the overall Sea Hawk Cove planned commercial development identified as Lot 2. The intent of the project is to provide a 510sqft coffee shop providing coffee and smoothie beverages along with limited pre-packaged food items (i.e. muffin tops). The business will be for drive- through services only with dual drive-through lanes and without any proposed parking or seating for on-site consumption. The development is intended on servicing the local community with competitive and affordable products and falls within the purpose of the zoning designation. Enclosed with this letter are supporting documents for the proposed project. Respectfully Submitted, Erin Dudley – Project Manager CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. 479-715-4123 | edudley@ceieng.com Firm: 6428 406 GRADE / FINISH FLOOR 0' - 0" ATTIC FLOOR 9' - 5 3/4" 7' - 1 0 1 / 2 " 15' - 2" EQ4' - 9"EQ B.O. CANOPY 8' - 6" A B DD F F G 10 10 MM 13 X X X 4 DRIVE THRU COFFEE H C E 6' - 0 " 2 1 2 1 2 SF1 B.O. STANDING SEAM ROOF 13' - 9 1/2" T.O. STANDING SEAM ROOF 19' - 1 7/8" 4' - 7"6' - 0"4' - 7" 15 11 ' - 5 " 4 A2.0 GRADE / FINISH FLOOR 0' - 0" ATTIC FLOOR 9' - 5 3/4" B.O. CANOPY 8' - 6" 15' - 2" 1 2 F J 78 10 10 3 3 12 MM 13 A C CC E 2 5 6 7 J B 2 9 1 101a 201 T.O. PARAPET 11' - 10 5/32" B.O. STANDING SEAM ROOF 13' - 9 1/2" B.O. STANDING SEAM ROOF 16' - 6 11/16" T.O. STANDING SEAM ROOF 19' - 1 7/8" 14 5/8" PLYWOOD SHEATHING CONNECTIION BOLTS PER STRUCTURAL 5/8" ZIP PANEL BACKER ROD AND CAULK 1/2" X 4" CONTINOUS GASKET PVC NITRILE SPONGE STRIP 2X4 TREATED BLOCKING PAINTED TO MATCH MP-4 NICHIHA STARTER MP-4 BRAKE METAL FLASHING NICHIHA WALL PANEL CAULK NICHIHA SPACER NICHIHA WALL PANEL HSS 3X2X1/8" PER STRUCTURAL NICHIHA KEYSTONE CORNER TRIM CANOPY COLUMNS RE: STRUCTURAL 7/16" SHEATHING 6" 9 1 / 2 " 1 LAYER MIN. WRB NICHIHA ATTACHMENT CLIP PL-1 1 1/2" DATE: 22 1 5 W C H E S T E R F I E L D B L V D , S U I T E 0 1 ∙ S P R I N G F I E L D , M O 6 5 8 0 7 ∙ P ( 4 1 7 ) 5 3 0 - 4 3 2 1 NAME: ARCHITECT OF RECORD: LICENSE NO. PROJECT NUMBER: REVISION: A2.0 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS FEBRUARY 6, 2025 ADAM KREHER AR98768 7 B R E W D R I V E - T H R U WI N T E R S P R I N G S , F L MI C H A E L B L A K E B L V D & E F L O R I D A 4 3 4 , WI N T E R S P R I N G S , F L O R I D A , 3 2 7 0 8 24387 7BWF 3/8" = 1'-0"1 EXTERIOR ELEVATION - FRONT 3/8" = 1'-0"2 EXTERIOR ELEVATION - BACK EXTERIOR ELEVATION MATERIALS LEGEND A MASONRY BOARD DECORATIVE WALL PANELS (PL-2) B MASONRY BOARD DECORATIVE WALL PANELS (PL-1) C REGAL BLUE BRAKE METAL FASCIA (MP-2) D REGAL BLUE SOFFIT PANELS (MP-2) E REGAL BLUE STANDING SEAM ROOF PANELS (MP-2) F PL-1 WRAP ON CANOPY COLUMNS TO BE INSTALLED ON SITE BY GC G ROUND STOREFRONT SIGN; SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED BY SIGN CONTRACTOR H 1/4" THICK ACRYLIC SIGNAGE APPLIED TO SIDING WITH VH DOUBLE SIDE TAPE J ZINC GREY BRAKE METAL CAP (MP-4) L ILLUMINATED STOREFRONT SIGNAGE BY SIGN CONTRACTOR M BOLLARD, PAINT (PT-1) EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEYNOTES 1 PRE-ENGINEERED ALUMINUM CANOPY BY OTHERS; SEE SHOP DRAWINGS 2 LED FLEX LIGHT; TO RECEIVE LIGHT SHIELDS PER DETAIL 3 OUTDOOR SPEAKERS MOUNTED TO CANOPIES - TYP OF (3) REF: SYSTEMS PLAN 4 ADDRESS NUMBERS TO BE 8" TALL x 2" BRUSH STROKE 5 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT; SEE ELECTRICAL 6 FROST-PROOF HOSE BIBB 7 EXTERIOR WEATHER-PROOF OUTLET; SEE MEP 8 ROOF SCUPPER DRAIN - TYP OF 2 9 SURFACE MOUNTED SIGN BOX 10 TOP OF FOOTER. COORDINATE WITH CIVIL. 11 GUARDRAIL; 3' - 6: ABOVE ATTIC FLOOR 12 SAMSUNG DIGITAL DISPLAYS - TYP OF (2) REF: SYSTEMS PLAN 13 BOLLARD. COORDINATE WITH CIVIL. 14 SCREENING BEYOND 15 ACCENT BAND, COLOR TO MATCH MP-4 2 ADD #02 APRIL 28, 2025 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3" = 1'-0"4 BUILDING CONNECTION CORNICE DETAIL 2 3" = 1'-0"3 CANOPY COLUMN DETAIL 05/14/2025 407 GRADE / FINISH FLOOR 0' - 0" ATTIC FLOOR 9' - 5 3/4" 3' - 2 " 10' - 0"1' - 4" B.O. CANOPY 8' - 6" 1' - 2 " A B G J 12 1 2 L A B 11 3 H 12 M 13 C 7 2 2 1 J DRIVE THRU COFFEE EQ. BEYOND FF SF3SF2 101c 101d T.O. PARAPET 11' - 10 5/32" B.O. STANDING SEAM ROOF 13' - 9 1/2" T.O. STANDING SEAM ROOF 19' - 1 7/8" 14 15 11 ' - 5 " GRADE / FINISH FLOOR 0' - 0" ATTIC FLOOR 9' - 5 3/4" 3' - 2 " B.O. CANOPY 8' - 6" 1' - 4"10' - 0" 1' - 2 " BB A A G J J L 9 7 11 3 4' - 0 " 3' - 4 " 2' - 4" C 2 2 1 BEYOND FF COOLER BEYOND 2 1 3 BEYOND 101b SF2 T.O. PARAPET 11' - 10 5/32" B.O. STANDING SEAM ROOF 13' - 9 1/2" T.O. STANDING SEAM ROOF 19' - 1 7/8" 14 15 11 ' - 5 " LED FLEX LIGHT MOUNTED TO FASCIA CANOPY FACSIA METAL PANEL SOFFIT CANOPY SUPPORT BEAM, REFER TO STRUCTURAL FLASHING SHIELD FOR LIGHT DATE: 22 1 5 W C H E S T E R F I E L D B L V D , S U I T E 0 1 ∙ S P R I N G F I E L D , M O 6 5 8 0 7 ∙ P ( 4 1 7 ) 5 3 0 - 4 3 2 1 NAME: ARCHITECT OF RECORD: LICENSE NO. PROJECT NUMBER: REVISION: A2.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS FEBRUARY 6, 2025 ADAM KREHER AR98768 7 B R E W D R I V E - T H R U WI N T E R S P R I N G S , F L MI C H A E L B L A K E B L V D & E F L O R I D A 4 3 4 , WI N T E R S P R I N G S , F L O R I D A , 3 2 7 0 8 24387 7BWF 3/8" = 1'-0"1 EXTERIOR ELEVATION - LEFT SIDE 3/8" = 1'-0"2 EXTERIOR ELEVATION - RIGHT SIDE EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEYNOTES 1 PRE-ENGINEERED ALUMINUM CANOPY BY OTHERS; SEE SHOP DRAWINGS 2 LED FLEX LIGHT; TO RECEIVE LIGHT SHIELDS PER DETAIL 3 OUTDOOR SPEAKERS MOUNTED TO CANOPIES - TYP OF (3) REF: SYSTEMS PLAN 4 ADDRESS NUMBERS TO BE 8" TALL x 2" BRUSH STROKE 5 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT; SEE ELECTRICAL 6 FROST-PROOF HOSE BIBB 7 EXTERIOR WEATHER-PROOF OUTLET; SEE MEP 8 ROOF SCUPPER DRAIN - TYP OF 2 9 SURFACE MOUNTED SIGN BOX 10 TOP OF FOOTER. COORDINATE WITH CIVIL. 11 GUARDRAIL; 3' - 6: ABOVE ATTIC FLOOR 12 SAMSUNG DIGITAL DISPLAYS - TYP OF (2) REF: SYSTEMS PLAN 13 BOLLARD. COORDINATE WITH CIVIL. 14 SCREENING BEYOND 15 ACCENT BAND, COLOR TO MATCH MP-4 EXTERIOR ELEVATION MATERIALS LEGEND A MASONRY BOARD DECORATIVE WALL PANELS (PL-2) B MASONRY BOARD DECORATIVE WALL PANELS (PL-1) C REGAL BLUE BRAKE METAL FASCIA (MP-2) D REGAL BLUE SOFFIT PANELS (MP-2) E REGAL BLUE STANDING SEAM ROOF PANELS (MP-2) F PL-1 WRAP ON CANOPY COLUMNS TO BE INSTALLED ON SITE BY GC G ROUND STOREFRONT SIGN; SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED BY SIGN CONTRACTOR H 1/4" THICK ACRYLIC SIGNAGE APPLIED TO SIDING WITH VH DOUBLE SIDE TAPE J ZINC GREY BRAKE METAL CAP (MP-4) L ILLUMINATED STOREFRONT SIGNAGE BY SIGN CONTRACTOR M BOLLARD, PAINT (PT-1) 3" = 1'-0"3 FLEX LIGHT SCREENING 2 2 2 ADD #02 APRIL 28, 2025 2 2 2 2 2 2 05/14/2025 408 A2.3 4 A2.3 5 A2.3 3 A2.3 2 1 118 SF 103 COOLER 83 SF 104 STORAGE 103 104 3 9' - 5 1 / 2 " 13 ' - 4 1 / 2 " 23 ' - 2 " 9' - 8 3/4" GRADE / FINISH FLOOR 0' - 0" D B 5 4 104 2 GRADE / FINISH FLOOR 0' - 0" D2 B 4 GRADE / FINISH FLOOR 0' - 0" D2 B 4 2' - 6"18' - 4"2' - 6" 3' - 0 " 7' - 0 " 10 ' - 0 " A GRADE / FINISH FLOOR 0' - 0" 2 DRIVE THRU COFFEE D B C 4 A 3' - 0 " 7' - 0 " 10 ' - 0 " 2' - 6"18' - 4"2' - 6" REMOTE COOLER GENERAL NOTES 1.LOCATION OF REMOTE COOLER MAY VARY. COORDINATE WITH CIVIL ENGINEER. 2. ALL DRAWINGS ARE BASED OFF U.S. COOLER. COORDINATE WITH OWNER FOR REMOTE COOLER SPECIFICATIONS. REMOTE COOLER MATERIALS LEGEND NOTE NUMBER NOTE TEXT B C D MASONRY BOARD DECORATIVE WALL PANELS (PL-1) 1/4" THICK ACRYLIC SIGNAGE APPLIED TO SIDING WITH VH DOUBLE SIDE TAPE ZINC GREY BRAKE METAL CAP (MP-4) A MASONRY BOARD DECORATIVE WALL PANELS (PL-2) REMOTE COOLER KEYNOTES NOTE NUMBER NOTE TEXT 1 2 3 4 HVAC EQUIPMENT BEYOND THROUGH WALL ROOF SCUPPER DRAIN TYP. RAMP PROVIDED BY COOLER MANUFACTURER FOUNDATION BY STRUCTURAL 5 ELECTRICAL JUNCTION BOX DATE: 22 1 5 W C H E S T E R F I E L D B L V D , S U I T E 0 1 ∙ S P R I N G F I E L D , M O 6 5 8 0 7 ∙ P ( 4 1 7 ) 5 3 0 - 4 3 2 1 NAME: ARCHITECT OF RECORD: LICENSE NO. PROJECT NUMBER: REVISION: A2.3 REMOTE COOLER ELEVATIONS AND FINISHES FEBRUARY 6, 2025 ADAM KREHER AR98768 7 B R E W D R I V E - T H R U WI N T E R S P R I N G S , F L MI C H A E L B L A K E B L V D & E F L O R I D A 4 3 4 , WI N T E R S P R I N G S , F L O R I D A , 3 2 7 0 8 24387 7BWF 3/8" = 1'-0"1 REMOTE COOLER PLAN 3/8" = 1'-0"3 COOLER ELEVATION - NORTH 3/8" = 1'-0"5 COOLER ELEVATION - SOUTH 3/8" = 1'-0"4 COOLER ELEVATION - WEST 3/8" = 1'-0"2 COOLER ELEVATION - EAST 1 ADD #01 APRIL 15, 2024 2 ADD #02 APRIL 28, 2025 2 2 05/14/2025 409 ANODIZED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT FRAMES BRAKE METAL PAC CLAD ONYX DISPLAY SCREENS TO BE MOUNTED AT 45 DEGREE ANGLE TOWARDS BUILDING 410 ANODIZED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT FRAMES BRAKE METAL PAC CLAD ONYX 411 Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Survey, Planning & Program Management 3030 LBJ Freeway, Suite 920 Dallas, TX 75234 Office: 972.488.3737 Toll-free: 1.877.488.3737 ceieng.com September 17, 2025 City of Winter Springs Community Development Department 1126 East State Rd 434 Winter Springs, FL 32708 407.327.1800 Re: 7Brew Coffee Shop – Letter of Intent – Variance Request E Florida 434 and Michael Blake Blvd. Winter Springs, FL 32708 Planning Department, The current zoning regulations as identified by Section 20-325 – Transect Standards within the City of Winter Springs Muni-code Codification Regulations, identifies that developments within this district are required to maintain a minimum front setback of 25’ with a maximum setback measurement of 50’. In order to preserve the integrity of the site intent along with providing the utmost in safety to the surrounding public, the 7Brew development is proposing to utilize a setback of 68.37’ to provide adequate turning radius’ and flow for the proposed cars and traffic exiting the site. As such, CEI Engineering Associates is requesting a waiver to the specified code requirements for front setbacks. Enclosed are the supporting documents and application for Staff’s consideration. Respectfully Submitted, Erin Dudley – Project Manager CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. 479-715-4123 | edudley@ceieng.com Firm: 6428 412 Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Survey, Planning & Program Management 3030 LBJ Freeway, Suite 920 Dallas, TX 75234 Office: 972.488.3737 Toll-free: 1.877.488.3737 ceieng.com October 21, 2025 City of Winter Springs Community Development Department 1126 East State Rd 434 Winter Springs, FL 32708 407.327.1800 Re: 7Brew Coffee Shop – Letter of Intent – Variance Request E Florida 434 and Michael Blake Blvd. Winter Springs, FL 32708 Planning Department, The current zoning regulations as identified by Article III – Establishment of Districts – Division 12 – Town Center District Code, Section 20-324(6) within the City of Winter Springs Muni-code Codification Regulations, identifies that drive-through developments in this district are regulated with drive-through windows and service areas only permitted in the rear and alley accessed locations , provided they do not substantially disrupt pedestrian activity or surrounding uses. With the given site area for development and in order to preserve the integrity of the 7Brew business model while providing the most enhanced development, the 7Brew building design encompasses the removal of the physical drive-through window and provides an open service area for customers to drive through. With this, the service area is located on the side of the building versus the rear. This design model does not hinder pedestrian activity or safety for surrounding areas and provides for better traffic circulation while fulling customer orders. As such, CEI Engineering Associates is requesting a waiver to the specified code requirements as referenced above. Enclosed are the supporting documents and application for Staff’s consideration. Respectfully Submitted, Erin Dudley – Project Manager CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. 479-715-4123 | edudley@ceieng.com Firm: 6428 413 Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Survey, Planning & Program Management 3030 LBJ Freeway, Suite 920 Dallas, TX 75234 Office: 972.488.3737 Toll-free: 1.877.488.3737 ceieng.com October 21, 2025 City of Winter Springs Community Development Department 1126 East State Rd 434 Winter Springs, FL 32708 407.327.1800 Re: 7Brew Coffee Shop – Letter of Intent – Variance Request E Florida 434 and Michael Blake Blvd. Winter Springs, FL 32708 Planning Department, The current zoning regulations as identified by Article VII. – S.R. 434 and Tuskawilla Road Streetscape Requirements - Section 20-601(b) within the City of Winter Springs Muni-code Codification Regulations, identifies that developments within this district are required to supply a minimum streetscape area of twenty- seven (27) feet in depth for properties located along the State Road 434 and Tuskawilla Road Corridors. More specifically: The total twenty-seven (27) feet of required streetscape area shall consist of three component parts which include: (1) Five-foot landscape area; (2) Six-foot sidewalk; and (3) Sixteen-foot landscape and treescape area for planting canopy trees which will line the right -of- way and installing any authorized street furnishings. With the given site area for development, in order to preserve the integrity of the site and provide the most enhanced development, 7Brew is proposing to supplement the required landscape area and subsequent landscape and treescape areas with shrubs and canopy trees. Current conditions provide a 3’ landscape area between SR 434 along with providing a 5’-10” sidewalk for pedestrians. 7Brew will additionally provide a 19’ 7” landscape buffer from the back of sidewalk. As such, CEI Engineering Associates is requesting a waiver to the specified code requirements as referenced above. Enclosed are the supporting documents and application for Staff’s consideration. Respectfully Submitted, Erin Dudley – Project Manager CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. 479-715-4123 | edudley@ceieng.com Firm: 6428 414 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 customerservice@winterspringsfl.org Application – Site Plan Review 01/2024 Page 1 of 3 The Community Development Director reserves the right to determine whether this application is complete and accurate. An incomplete application will not be processed and will be returned to the applicant. The application shall be reviewed per Florida Statue 419.001. Applications shall be reviewed for sufficiency (completeness) within thirty (30) calendar days per FL Statue 166.033. By submitting this application, you hereby grant temporary right of entry for City officials to enter upon the subject property for purposes of evaluating this application. Site Plan Type Type of Development: Residential Non-Residential Preliminary Review Final Review Combined Preliminary/Final Resubmittal Recorded Plat Project Name: Date: Applicant/Agent Information Applicant(s): Mailing Address: Email: Phone Number: Person Who Will Upload Plans: Email: Phone#: Property Owner(s) Name (If Applicant is not the Property Owner) Name: Email: Phone #: Mailing Address: Phone Number: Site Information Project Address: Parcel ID(s): Parcel Size: Existing Use: Proposed Use: Zoning District: Future Land Use: X X 1/27/2025 Erin Dudley 2600 NE 11th Street Bentonville, AR 72712 edudley@ceieng.com 479-321-0035 Natasha Ruiz nruiz@ceieng.com 972.488.3737 Tuskawilla Retail Partners II, LLC c/o Catalyst Development Partners robm@catalystdp.com 678-515-5376 4400 Marsh Landing Blvd, Suite 203 Jacksonville, FL 32250 678-515-5376 E Florida 434 & Michael Blake Blvd, Winter Springs, FL 32708 26-20-30-5AR-00A00-007L 0.5ac portion of a 8.03 acre lot Vacant Lot 7 Brew Drive Thru Coffee Shop T-C Town Center District 7 Brew Drive Thru Coffee Shop 415 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 customerservice@winterspringsfl.org Application – Site Plan Review 01/2024 Page 2 of 3 Is the property located in the Town Center District? _____Yes _____No Is the property within the S.R. 434 Corridor Overlay District? _____Yes _____No Is the property located in the Greeneway Interchange Zoning District? _____Yes _____No The Planning and Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency shall review Site Plan Applications and make a written recommendation to the City Commission. The City Commission shall render all final decisions regarding Preliminary and Final Engineering Plans and may impose reasonable conditions on any approved plans to the extent deemed necessary and relevant to ensure compliance with applicable criteria and other applicable provisions of the City Code and Comprehensive Plan. All formal decisions shall be based upon the applicable criteria as set forth in the City’s Code of Ordinances Chapter 9, Land Development and Chapter 20, Zoning. Applicants are advised, that if they decide to appeal any decisions made at the meetings or hearings, with respect to any matter considered at the meetings or hearings, they will need a record of the proceedings and, for such purposes, they will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, at their cost, which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based, per 286.0105, Florida Statutes. Application Fees Fees are as reflected on the Fee Schedule plus actual costs incurred for advertising or notification, and reimbursement for technical, and/or professional services which may be required in connection with the review, inspection, or approval of any development (based on accounting submitted by the City Consultant), payable prior to approval of the pertinent stage of development. X X X 416 41 7 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 customerservice@winterspringsfl.org Application – Aesthetic Review 01/2024 Page 1 of 5 The Community Development Director reserves the right to determine whether this application is complete and accurate. An incomplete application will not be processed and will be returned to the applicant. The application shall be reviewed per Chapter 9–Aesthetic Review Sec.9-605. All applications shall be reviewed for sufficiency (completeness) within thirty (30) calendar days per FL Statue 166.033. Once the application is deemed sufficient, the applicant shall move forward with the Community Workshop, required per Chapter 20–Zoning Sec.20-29.1. All applicants shall be afforded minimal due process as required by law, including the right to receive notice, be heard, present evidence, cross-examine witnesses, and be represented by a duly authorized representative. Applicants are further advised that a Conditional Use is quasi-judicial in nature. Therefore, APPLICANT ACKNOWLEDGES and AGREES, by signing below, that he or she: • May be sworn-in as a witness in order to provide testimony to the City Commission; • Shall be subject to cross-examination by party intervenors (if requested); and • Shall be required to qualify expert witnesses, as appropriate. Applicants are encouraged to familiarize themselves with Chapter 2 – Administration Sec. 2-30 of the Winter Springs City Code relating to Quasi-Judicial Rules and Procedures of the City Commission. All Aesthetic Review recommendations shall be based from the required information/documentation provided, the Winter Springs Code of Ordinances, and the Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan (to the extent applicable). The City Commission (CC) shall render all final decisions regarding Aesthetic Review and may impose reasonable conditions on any approved Aesthetic Review to the extent deemed necessary and relevant to ensure compliance with applicable criteria and other applicable provisions of the Winter Springs Code of Ordinances and the Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan. All formal decisions shall be based on competent substantial evidence and the applicable criteria as set forth in Chapter 9, Aesthetic Review Standards. Applicants are advised that if, they decide to appeal any decisions made at the meetings or hearings with respect to any matter considered at the meetings or hearings, they will need a record of the proceedings and, for such purposes, they will need to insure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, at their cost, which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based, per Florida Statute 286.0105. An Aesthetic Review Approval by the City Commission under this article shall be valid for a maximum of eighteen (18) months from the date the city commission renders its approval at a public meeting. If the applicant fails to obtain a building permit within the eighteen (18) month period, the city commission's approval shall expire at the end of the period. However, once a building permit is issued, the approval shall be valid for a time period equal to the permit and shall expire only if the building permit expires. Reasonable extensions may be granted by the city commission upon good cause shown by the applicant, provided substantial changes have not occurred in the surrounding area that would make the prior approval inconsistent with the criteria set forth in Chapter 9-Aesthetic Review Sec.9-9603 418 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 customerservice@winterspringsfl.org Application – Aesthetic Review 01/2024 Page 2 of 5 REQUIRED INFORMATION Applicant(s): Date: Mailing address: Email: Phone Number: Property Owner(s): Mailing Address: Email: Phone Number: Project Name: Property Address: Parcel ID(s): Parcel Size: Existing Use: List all witnesses that the applicant intends to present to the City Commission to provide testimony: Describe with specificity any evidence which the applicant intends to present to the City Commission, including oral factual testimony, maps, photographs, records or reports and/or expert testimony: Attach all documentary evidence which the applicant intends to present to the city commission to the back of this application. The Applicant has a continuing duty to update the list of witnesses, description of evidence, and documentary evidence throughout the application process. Additional witnesses or evidence will not be admitted at the city commission hearing if not submitted at least seven (7) days prior to such hearing. CEI Engineering Associates Inc / Erin Dudley 02/05/2025 2600 NE 11th Street Bentonville, AR 72712 edudley@ceieng.com 479-321-0035 Tuskawilla Retail Partners, LLC c/o Catalyst Development Partners 4400 Marsh Landing Blvd, Suite 203 Jacksonville, FL 32250 robm@catalystdp.com 678-515-5376 7Brew Drive-Thru Coffee Shop E Florida 434 & Michael Blake Blvd Winter Springs FL 32708 26-20-30-5AR-00A00-007L 0.5acre vacant lot Project Manager, Erin Dudley of CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. and 7Venture Representative. Site plans, landscape plans, elevations w/materials proposed, legal description/site survey information, site environmental/geotech reports (if requested), Overall Development plans, as needed. Development staff will be available for any presented questions or testimony as required. 419 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 customerservice@winterspringsfl.org Application – Aesthetic Review 01/2024 Page 3 of 5 Criteria for Review 1. The plans and specifications of the proposed project indicate that the setting, landscaping, proportions, materials, colors, texture, scale, unity, balance, rhythm, contrast, and simplicity are coordinated in a harmonious manner relevant to the particular proposal, surrounding area and cultural character of the community. 2. The plans for the proposed project are in harmony with any future development which has been formally approved by the City within the surrounding area. 3. The plans for the proposed project are not excessively similar or dissimilar to any other building, structure or sign which is either fully constructed, permitted but not fully constructed, or included on the same permit application, and facing upon the same or intersecting street within five hundred (500) feet of the proposed site, with respect to one or more of the following features of exterior design and appearance: a. Front or side elevations; b. Size and arrangement of elevation facing the street, including reverse arrangement; or c. Other significant features of design such as, but not limited to: materials, roof line, hardscape improvements, and height or design elements. 4. The plans for the proposed project are in harmony with, or significantly enhance, the established character of other buildings, structures or signs in the surrounding area with respect to architectural specifications and design features deemed significant based upon commonly accepted architectural principles of the local community. 5. The proposed project is consistent and compatible with the intent and purpose of this article, the Comprehensive Plan for Winter Springs, design criteria adopted by the City (e.g. Town Center guidelines, SR 434 design specifications) and other applicable federal, state or local laws. 6. The proposed project has incorporated significant architectural enhancements such as concrete masonry units with stucco, marble, termite-resistant wood, wrought iron, brick, columns and piers, porches, arches, fountains, planting areas, display windows, and other distinctive design detailing and promoting the character of the community. 420 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 customerservice@winterspringsfl.org Application – Aesthetic Review 01/2024 Page 4 of 5 REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION ___ A complete Application and applicable fee ___ Minor (Site less than 2 acres) ___ Major (Site greater than 2 acres) ___ Modification of previously approved Aesthetic Review ___ A Legal Description accompanied by a certified survey or the portion of the map maintained by the Seminole County Property Appraiser reflecting the boundaries of the subject property (To scale). ___ Site Plan ___ Building Elevations (color) illustrating all sides of structures ___ Color rendering illustrating street view with landscaping at time of planting; ___ Illustrations of all walls, fences, and other accessory structures and indication of their height and the materials proposed for their construction; ___ Signage elevations of proposed exterior permanent signs, outdoor advertising or other constructed elements other than habitable space, if any; ___ Identification of materials, textures, and colors to be used on all buildings, accessory structures, exterior signs, and other constructed elements; ___ Other architectural and engineering data as may be requested to clarify the application. ___ For all new commercial development and new residential subdivisions of ten (10) or more lots or existing commercial buildings being altered by 50 percent or greater of the original floor plan or seating capacity and requiring a modified site plan, or development agreements process under section 20-28.1 of the City Code, or as otherwise deemed applicable by the city to relevantly and competently examine an application for compliance with the city code and the affect and impact the proposed use will have on neighborhood and surrounding properties, applicants shall be required to submit with the following additional information referenced in Chapter 20 – Zoning Sec.20.29 Applications (7) – (11). x x x x x x x N/A N/A x Landscape plans provided N/A 421 42 2 42 3 Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Survey, Planning & Program Management 3030 LBJ Freeway, Suite 920 Dallas, TX 75234 Office: 972.488.3737 Toll-free: 1.877.488.3737 ceieng.com March 12, 2025 City of Winter Springs Community Development Department 1126 East State Rd 434 Winter Springs, FL 32708 407.327.1800 Re: 7Brew Coffee Shop – Letter of Intent E Florida 434 and Michael Blake Blvd. Winter Springs, FL 32708 Planning Department, On behalf of Tuskawilla Retail Partners, LLC c/o Catalyst Development Partners and subsequent lease holder, 7Venture, LLC, CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. is reaching out to respectfully present for your review, our submittal for a Development Agreement Application for a newly proposed commercial development. The proposed site is located within the T-5 Urban Center zoning designation which is comprised of the core of the Town Center and is synonymous with the City’s Urban Central Business District. It is understood that this designation shall consist of a higher intensity mix of uses. Currently, the site is a vacant parcel within the overall Sea Hawk Cove planned commercial development identified as Lot 2. The intent of the project is to provide a 510sqft coffee shop providing coffee and smoothie beverages along with limited pre-packaged food items (i.e. muffin tops). The business will be for drive- through services only with dual drive-through lanes and without any proposed parking or seating for on-site consumption. The development is intended on servicing the local community with competitive and affordable products and falls within the purpose of the zoning designation. Enclosed with this letter are supporting documents for the proposed project. Respectfully Submitted, Erin Dudley – Project Manager CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. 479-715-4123 | edudley@ceieng.com Firm: 6428 424 42 5 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 customerservice@winterspringsfl.org Application – Development Agreement 01/2024 Page 2 of 4 Property Address: Parcel ID(s): Parcel Size: Project Name: A general description of the relief sought under this division. A brief explanation, with applicable supporting competent substantial evidence and documents, as to why the application satisfies the relevant criteria set forth in the City Zoning Code and City Comprehensive Plan. List all witnesses that the applicant intends to present to the City Commission to provide testimony: Describe with specificity any evidence which the applicant intends to present to the City Commission, including oral factual testimony, maps, photographs, records or reports and/or expert testimony: Attach all documentary evidence which the applicant intends to present to the city commission to the back of this application. The Applicant has a continuing duty to update the list of witnesses, description of evidence, and documentary evidence throughout the application process. Additional witnesses or evidence will not be admitted at the city commission hearing if not submitted at least seven (7) days prior to such hearing E Florida 434 & Michael Blake Blvd Winter Springs FL 32708 26-20-30-5AR-00A00-007L 8.03 acres 7Brew Drive-Thru Coffee Shop Project Manager, Erin Dudley of CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. and 7Venture Representative. Preliminary site plans, landscape plans, colored rendering and elevations w/materials, legal description/site surveys, and supplemental information such as site environmental and geotechnical reports, and civil/storm water management plans. Development staff will be available for any presented questions or testimony as required. Allowance for the development of the proposed 510sqft drive-through only coffee shop in the T-5 Urban Center Zone. Development meets the requirements and standards of the T-5 Urban Center Zone and is an allowable use subject to design aesthetic review and regular site plan review processes. The proposed development is relatively small in nature and allows for the shallow setbacks with buildings oriented close to the street as outlined in the T5 Urban Center Zone Character use description. 426 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 customerservice@winterspringsfl.org Application – Development Agreement 01/2024 Page 3 of 4 REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION ___ A complete Application and Fee ___ An Electronic copy of the most recent survey of the subject property. ___ An Electronic copy of the Legal Description of the subject property. ___ Documentation and Data supporting the request. x x x x 427 42 8 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 customerservice@winterspringsfl.org Application – Waiver 01/2024 Page 1 of 6 The Community Development Director reserves the right to determine whether this application is complete and accurate. An incomplete application will not be processed and will be returned to the applicant. The application shall be reviewed per Chapter 20 – Zoning Sec. 20-34. Applications shall be reviewed for sufficiency (completeness) within thirty (30) calendar days per FL Statue 166.033. All applicants shall be afforded minimal due process as required by law, including the right to receive notice, be heard, present evidence, cross-examine witnesses, and be represented by a duly authorized representative. Applicants are further advised that a Waiver is quasi-judicial in nature. Therefore, APPLICANT ACKNOWLEDGES and AGREES, by signing below, that he or she: • May be sworn-in as a witness in order to provide testimony to the City Commission; • Shall be subject to cross-examination by party intervenors (if requested); and • Shall be required to qualify expert witnesses, as appropriate. Applicants are encouraged to familiarize themselves with Chapter 2 – Administration Sec. 2-30 of the Winter Springs City Code relating to Quasi-Judicial Rules and Procedures of the City Commission. All Waiver recommendations shall be based from the required information/documentation provided, the Winter Springs Code of Ordinances, and the Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan (to the extent applicable). The City Commission (CC) shall render all final decisions regarding Waivers and may impose reasonable conditions on any approved Waiver to the extent deemed necessary and relevant to ensure compliance with applicable criteria and other applicable provisions of the Winter Springs Code of Ordinances and the Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan. All formal decisions shall be based on competent substantial evidence and the applicable criteria as set forth in Chapter 20, Zoning. Applicants are advised that if, they decide to appeal any decisions made at the meetings or hearings with respect to any matter considered at the meetings or hearings, they will need a record of the proceedings and, for such purposes, they will need to insure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, at their cost, which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based, per Florida Statute 286.0105. A Waiver which may be granted by the City Commission shall expire two (2) years after the effective date of such approval by the City Commission, unless a building permit based upon and incorporating the Waiver, is issued by the City within said time period. Upon written request of the property owner, the City Commission may extend the expiration date, without public hearing, an additional six (6) months, provided the property owner demonstrates good cause for the extension In addition, if the aforementioned building permit is timely issued, and the building permit subsequently expires and the subject development project is abandoned or discontinued for a period of six months, the Waiver shall be deemed expired and null and void, per Chapter 20 – Sec.20-36. 429 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 customerservice@winterspringsfl.org Application – Waiver 01/2024 Page 2 of 6 REQUIRED INFORMATION Applicant(s): Date: Mailing address: Email: Phone Number: Property Owner(s): Mailing Address: Email: Phone Number: Project Name: Property Address: Parcel ID(s): Parcel Size: Existing Use: All waiver requests shall be written in the following format: A waiver is requested from Winter Springs City Code 'X' to allow 'Y' in lieu of 'Z'. After the request, the applicant shall provide a justification for each waiver request. List Waiver(s)(provide additional sheets if necessary): Demonstrate that the applicable term or condition clearly creates an illogical, impossible, impractical, or patently unreasonable result related to the proposed property and development? Erin Dudley 2600 NE 11th Street Bentonville, AR 72712 9/16/2025 edudley@ceieng.com 479.321.0035 Tuskawilla Retail Partners II, LLC c/o Catalyst Development Partners 4400 Marsh Landing Blvd., Suite 203 Jacksonville, FL 32250 robm@catalystdp.com 678.515.5376 7Brew Drive Thru Coffee Shop E Florida 434 & Michael Blake Blvd., Winter Springs FL 32708 26-20-30-5AR-00A00-007L 0.5ac portion of 8.03ac lot vacant Requesting waiver for the required primary structure as proposed front setback from SR434 exceeds the 50' max regulations as noted under the current code requirements. The site is designed with proposed 68.37' setback required for a safe turning radius for the cars exiting the site. If the 50' max setback were to be enforced, it would create an impractical turning radius for the cars exiting the drive thru lanes that could cause a back up of service in the lanes. 430 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 customerservice@winterspringsfl.org Application – Waiver 01/2024 Page 3 of 6 Demonstrate that the proposed development plan is in substantial compliance with Chapter 20 of the City’s Code of Ordinances and in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan? Will the proposed development plan significantly enhance the real property? Will the proposed development plan serve the public health, safety, and welfare of the City of Winter Springs? Will the waiver diminish property values in or alter the essential character of the surrounding neighborhood? Is the waiver request the minimum waiver that will eliminate or reduce the illogical, impossible, impractical, or patently unreasonable result caused by the applicable term or condition under Chapter 20 – Zoning? Yes, the proposed development is designed with the surrounding community interest for public access, drive functionality and pedestrian safety in mind. The proposed setback for the building is further demonstration of taking into account the safety of the surrounding community when accessing the site. No, the property value will be sustained if not built upon for the considerable site design constraints allowing for safe consumer access and flow to surrounding developments. Yes Yes. The property is currently a vacant parcel with typical vegetation. The proposed develop will enhance the surrounding neighborhood both with providing the public with accessible consumable items but also bringing growth and development to the community. The property as-is does not serve any public interest. The site meets the requirements of the Code of Ordinances and is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan with the exception of the proposed waiver regarding the setback distance to the building frontage. The development itself captures the intent of the higher intensity of mixed uses that the T5 Zoning District is designed for and fits within the vision of fairly small blocks with wide sidewalks and fulfills the necessary landscaping needs. 431 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 customerservice@winterspringsfl.org Application – Waiver 01/2024 Page 4 of 6 Is the proposed development plan compatible and harmonious with the surrounding neighborhood? List all witnesses that the applicant intends to present to the City Commission to provide testimony: Describe with specificity any evidence which the applicant intends to present to the City Commission, including oral factual testimony, maps, photographs, records or reports and/or expert testimony: Attach all documentary evidence which the applicant intends to present to the city commission to the back of this application. The Applicant has a continuing duty to update the list of witnesses, description of evidence, and documentary evidence throughout the application process. Additional witnesses or evidence will not be admitted at the city commission hearing if not submitted at least seven (7) days prior to such hearing Yes, the proposed site is located within the T-5 Urban Center Zoning which is comprised of the core of the Town Center and is synonymous with the City's Urban Central Business District. It is understood that the designation of this site shall consist of a higher intensity mix of uses. The intent of this project site is to provide a business intended on servicing the local community with competitive and affordable products and falls within the purpose of the zoning designation and surrounding developments. Project Manager, Erin Dudley of CEI Engineering Associates, Inc and 7Venture Representative Site plans, landscape plans, elevations w/materials proposed, legal description/site survey information, site environmental/geotech reports (if requested), Overall Development plans, as needed. Development staff will be available for any presented questions or testimony as required. 432 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 customerservice@winterspringsfl.org Application – Waiver 01/2024 Page 5 of 6 REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION ___ A complete Application and Fee ___ A general description of the relief sought under this division ___ A brief explanation, with applicable supporting competent substantial evidence and documents, as to why the application satisfies the relevant criteria set forth in this division ___ A Legal Description accompanied by a certified survey or the portion of the map maintained by the Seminole County Property Appraiser reflecting the boundaries of the subject property (To scale). ___ An Excel mailing list with the names and addresses of each property owner within 500 ft. of each property line, along with the HOA Associations within 1/2 mile of each property line. ___ For all new commercial development and new residential subdivisions of ten (10) or more lots or existing commercial buildings being altered by 50 percent or greater of the original floor plan or seating capacity and requiring a modified site plan, or development agreements process under section 20-28.1 of the City Code, or as otherwise deemed applicable by the city to relevantly and competently examine an application for compliance with the city code and the affect and impact the proposed use will have on neighborhood and surrounding properties, applicants shall be required to submit with the following additional information referenced in Chapter 20 – Zoning Sec.20.29 Applications (7) – (11). X X X X X 433 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 customerservice@winterspringsfl.org Application – Waiver 01/2024 Page 6 of 6 CITY LIMITED RIGHT OF ENTRY: By submitting this Application you hereby grant temporary right of entry for City Officials to enter upon the subject property for purposes of evaluating this Application and posting on the subject property. APPLICANT’S AUTHORIZATION: I desire to make Application for a Waiver for the aforementioned project and have read and agree to the terms contained herein. In addition, if the Applicant is a corporate entity, the undersigned hereby represents and warrants that he/she is authorized to act on behalf of, and bind, the corporate entity. Applicant Name (Print): Applicant Signature: Date: Business Name: Address: Parcel ID: STATE OF COUNTY OF Date The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification and who did/did not take an oath. Date: (seal): Notary Public Signature: My Commission Expires: Note: The Property Owner shall sign and have their signature notarized below if the Applicant is not the owner of the subject property. Property Owner’s Name (Print): Property Owner Signature: STATE OF COUNTY OF Date The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification and who did/did not take an oath. Date: (seal): Notary Public Signature: My Commission expires: Erin Dudley - CEI Engineering - Project Manager 09/17/2025 CEI Engineering Associates Inc 2600 NE 11th Suite 300 Bentonville, AR 72712 26-20-30-5AR-00A00-007L See attached Owner Authorization 434 Property Owner Tuskawilla Retail Partners II, LLC Parcel 26-20-30-5AR-0A00-007L Legal Description: Parcel 1 Lot 8, Block A D R MITCHELLS SURVEY OF THE LEVY GRANT Authorized Applicant: CEI Engineering Associates Inc 43 5 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 customerservice@winterspringsfl.org Application – Waiver 01/2024 Page 1 of 6 The Community Development Director reserves the right to determine whether this application is complete and accurate. An incomplete application will not be processed and will be returned to the applicant. The application shall be reviewed per Chapter 20 – Zoning Sec. 20-34. Applications shall be reviewed for sufficiency (completeness) within thirty (30) calendar days per FL Statue 166.033. All applicants shall be afforded minimal due process as required by law, including the right to receive notice, be heard, present evidence, cross-examine witnesses, and be represented by a duly authorized representative. Applicants are further advised that a Waiver is quasi-judicial in nature. Therefore, APPLICANT ACKNOWLEDGES and AGREES, by signing below, that he or she: • May be sworn-in as a witness in order to provide testimony to the City Commission; • Shall be subject to cross-examination by party intervenors (if requested); and • Shall be required to qualify expert witnesses, as appropriate. Applicants are encouraged to familiarize themselves with Chapter 2 – Administration Sec. 2-30 of the Winter Springs City Code relating to Quasi-Judicial Rules and Procedures of the City Commission. All Waiver recommendations shall be based from the required information/documentation provided, the Winter Springs Code of Ordinances, and the Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan (to the extent applicable). The City Commission (CC) shall render all final decisions regarding Waivers and may impose reasonable conditions on any approved Waiver to the extent deemed necessary and relevant to ensure compliance with applicable criteria and other applicable provisions of the Winter Springs Code of Ordinances and the Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan. All formal decisions shall be based on competent substantial evidence and the applicable criteria as set forth in Chapter 20, Zoning. Applicants are advised that if, they decide to appeal any decisions made at the meetings or hearings with respect to any matter considered at the meetings or hearings, they will need a record of the proceedings and, for such purposes, they will need to insure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, at their cost, which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based, per Florida Statute 286.0105. A Waiver which may be granted by the City Commission shall expire two (2) years after the effective date of such approval by the City Commission, unless a building permit based upon and incorporating the Waiver, is issued by the City within said time period. Upon written request of the property owner, the City Commission may extend the expiration date, without public hearing, an additional six (6) months, provided the property owner demonstrates good cause for the extension In addition, if the aforementioned building permit is timely issued, and the building permit subsequently expires and the subject development project is abandoned or discontinued for a period of six months, the Waiver shall be deemed expired and null and void, per Chapter 20 – Sec.20-36. 436 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 customerservice@winterspringsfl.org Application – Waiver 01/2024 Page 2 of 6 REQUIRED INFORMATION Applicant(s): Date: Mailing address: Email: Phone Number: Property Owner(s): Mailing Address: Email: Phone Number: Project Name: Property Address: Parcel ID(s): Parcel Size: Existing Use: All waiver requests shall be written in the following format: A waiver is requested from Winter Springs City Code 'X' to allow 'Y' in lieu of 'Z'. After the request, the applicant shall provide a justification for each waiver request. List Waiver(s)(provide additional sheets if necessary): Demonstrate that the applicable term or condition clearly creates an illogical, impossible, impractical, or patently unreasonable result related to the proposed property and development? Erin Dudley 2600 NE 11th Street Bentonville, AR 72712 10/16/2025 edudley@ceieng.com 479.321.0035 Tuskawilla Retail Partners II, LLC c/o Catalyst Development Partners 4400 Marsh Landing Blvd., Suite 203 Jacksonville, FL 32250 robm@catalystdp.com 678.515.5376 7Brew Drive Thru Coffee Shop E Florida 434 & Michael Blake Blvd., Winter Springs FL 32708 26-20-30-5AR-00A00-007L 0.5ac portion of 8.03ac lot vacant Requesting waiver for the proposed service area to be located at the side of the building versus located in the rear as specified in Article III - Establishment of Districts - Division 12 - Town Center District Code, Section 20-324(6). Please refer to Letter of Intent for request details. The proposed site design accommodates the best use of the space available for customer ease of service. The design model does not hinder pedestrian activity or safety for the surrounding areas and provides for better traffic circulation while fulfilling customer orders. By enforcing the service area to be located to the rear of the building, it would hinder the overall business model and would cause traffic flow and safety concerns for the service staff. 437 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 customerservice@winterspringsfl.org Application – Waiver 01/2024 Page 3 of 6 Demonstrate that the proposed development plan is in substantial compliance with Chapter 20 of the City’s Code of Ordinances and in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan? Will the proposed development plan significantly enhance the real property? Will the proposed development plan serve the public health, safety, and welfare of the City of Winter Springs? Will the waiver diminish property values in or alter the essential character of the surrounding neighborhood? Is the waiver request the minimum waiver that will eliminate or reduce the illogical, impossible, impractical, or patently unreasonable result caused by the applicable term or condition under Chapter 20 – Zoning? Yes, the proposed development is designed with the surrounding community interest for public access, drive functionality and pedestrian safety in mind. The proposed service area location not only enhances the functionality of the site but also provides convenience of serviceability to the patron customers as well. No, the property value will be sustained if not built upon with the considerable site design constraints. Yes Yes. The property is currently a vacant parcel with typical vegetation. The proposed develop will enhance the surrounding neighborhood both with providing the public with accessible consumable items but also bringing growth and development to the community. The property as-is does not serve any public interest. The site meets the requirements of the Code of Ordinances and is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan with the exception of the proposed waiver regarding the service area location. The development itself captures the intent of the higher intensity of mixed uses that the T5 Zoning District is designed for and fits within the vision of fairly small blocks. 438 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 customerservice@winterspringsfl.org Application – Waiver 01/2024 Page 4 of 6 Is the proposed development plan compatible and harmonious with the surrounding neighborhood? List all witnesses that the applicant intends to present to the City Commission to provide testimony: Describe with specificity any evidence which the applicant intends to present to the City Commission, including oral factual testimony, maps, photographs, records or reports and/or expert testimony: Attach all documentary evidence which the applicant intends to present to the city commission to the back of this application. The Applicant has a continuing duty to update the list of witnesses, description of evidence, and documentary evidence throughout the application process. Additional witnesses or evidence will not be admitted at the city commission hearing if not submitted at least seven (7) days prior to such hearing Yes, the proposed site is located within the T-5 Urban Center Zoning which is comprised of the core of the Town Center and is synonymous with the City's Urban Central Business District. It is understood that the designation of this site shall consist of a higher intensity mix of uses. The intent of this project site is to provide a business intended on servicing the local community with competitive and affordable products and falls within the purpose of the zoning designation and surrounding developments. Project Manager, Erin Dudley of CEI Engineering Associates, Inc and 7Venture Representative Site plans, landscape plans, elevations w/materials proposed, legal description/site survey information, site environmental/geotech reports (if requested), Overall Development plans, as needed. Development staff will be available for any presented questions or testimony as required. 439 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 customerservice@winterspringsfl.org Application – Waiver 01/2024 Page 5 of 6 REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION ___ A complete Application and Fee ___ A general description of the relief sought under this division ___ A brief explanation, with applicable supporting competent substantial evidence and documents, as to why the application satisfies the relevant criteria set forth in this division ___ A Legal Description accompanied by a certified survey or the portion of the map maintained by the Seminole County Property Appraiser reflecting the boundaries of the subject property (To scale). ___ An Excel mailing list with the names and addresses of each property owner within 500 ft. of each property line, along with the HOA Associations within 1/2 mile of each property line. ___ For all new commercial development and new residential subdivisions of ten (10) or more lots or existing commercial buildings being altered by 50 percent or greater of the original floor plan or seating capacity and requiring a modified site plan, or development agreements process under section 20-28.1 of the City Code, or as otherwise deemed applicable by the city to relevantly and competently examine an application for compliance with the city code and the affect and impact the proposed use will have on neighborhood and surrounding properties, applicants shall be required to submit with the following additional information referenced in Chapter 20 – Zoning Sec.20.29 Applications (7) – (11). X X X X X 440 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 customerservice@winterspringsfl.org Application – Waiver 01/2024 Page 6 of 6 CITY LIMITED RIGHT OF ENTRY: By submitting this Application you hereby grant temporary right of entry for City Officials to enter upon the subject property for purposes of evaluating this Application and posting on the subject property. APPLICANT’S AUTHORIZATION: I desire to make Application for a Waiver for the aforementioned project and have read and agree to the terms contained herein. In addition, if the Applicant is a corporate entity, the undersigned hereby represents and warrants that he/she is authorized to act on behalf of, and bind, the corporate entity. Applicant Name (Print): Applicant Signature: Date: Business Name: Address: Parcel ID: STATE OF COUNTY OF Date The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification and who did/did not take an oath. Date: (seal): Notary Public Signature: My Commission Expires: Note: The Property Owner shall sign and have their signature notarized below if the Applicant is not the owner of the subject property. Property Owner’s Name (Print): Property Owner Signature: STATE OF COUNTY OF Date The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification and who did/did not take an oath. Date: (seal): Notary Public Signature: My Commission expires: Erin Dudley - CEI Engineering - Project Manager 10/16/2025 CEI Engineering Associates Inc 2600 NE 11th Suite 300 Bentonville, AR 72712 26-20-30-5AR-00A00-007L See attached Owner Authorization 441 Property Owner Tuskawilla Retail Partners II, LLC Parcel 26-20-30-5AR-0A00-007L Legal Description: Parcel 1 Lot 8, Block A D R MITCHELLS SURVEY OF THE LEVY GRANT Authorized Applicant: CEI Engineering Associates Inc 44 2 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 customerservice@winterspringsfl.org Application – Waiver 01/2024 Page 1 of 6 The Community Development Director reserves the right to determine whether this application is complete and accurate. An incomplete application will not be processed and will be returned to the applicant. The application shall be reviewed per Chapter 20 – Zoning Sec. 20-34. Applications shall be reviewed for sufficiency (completeness) within thirty (30) calendar days per FL Statue 166.033. All applicants shall be afforded minimal due process as required by law, including the right to receive notice, be heard, present evidence, cross-examine witnesses, and be represented by a duly authorized representative. Applicants are further advised that a Waiver is quasi-judicial in nature. Therefore, APPLICANT ACKNOWLEDGES and AGREES, by signing below, that he or she: • May be sworn-in as a witness in order to provide testimony to the City Commission; • Shall be subject to cross-examination by party intervenors (if requested); and • Shall be required to qualify expert witnesses, as appropriate. Applicants are encouraged to familiarize themselves with Chapter 2 – Administration Sec. 2-30 of the Winter Springs City Code relating to Quasi-Judicial Rules and Procedures of the City Commission. All Waiver recommendations shall be based from the required information/documentation provided, the Winter Springs Code of Ordinances, and the Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan (to the extent applicable). The City Commission (CC) shall render all final decisions regarding Waivers and may impose reasonable conditions on any approved Waiver to the extent deemed necessary and relevant to ensure compliance with applicable criteria and other applicable provisions of the Winter Springs Code of Ordinances and the Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan. All formal decisions shall be based on competent substantial evidence and the applicable criteria as set forth in Chapter 20, Zoning. Applicants are advised that if, they decide to appeal any decisions made at the meetings or hearings with respect to any matter considered at the meetings or hearings, they will need a record of the proceedings and, for such purposes, they will need to insure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, at their cost, which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based, per Florida Statute 286.0105. A Waiver which may be granted by the City Commission shall expire two (2) years after the effective date of such approval by the City Commission, unless a building permit based upon and incorporating the Waiver, is issued by the City within said time period. Upon written request of the property owner, the City Commission may extend the expiration date, without public hearing, an additional six (6) months, provided the property owner demonstrates good cause for the extension In addition, if the aforementioned building permit is timely issued, and the building permit subsequently expires and the subject development project is abandoned or discontinued for a period of six months, the Waiver shall be deemed expired and null and void, per Chapter 20 – Sec.20-36. 443 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 customerservice@winterspringsfl.org Application – Waiver 01/2024 Page 2 of 6 REQUIRED INFORMATION Applicant(s): Date: Mailing address: Email: Phone Number: Property Owner(s): Mailing Address: Email: Phone Number: Project Name: Property Address: Parcel ID(s): Parcel Size: Existing Use: All waiver requests shall be written in the following format: A waiver is requested from Winter Springs City Code 'X' to allow 'Y' in lieu of 'Z'. After the request, the applicant shall provide a justification for each waiver request. List Waiver(s)(provide additional sheets if necessary): Demonstrate that the applicable term or condition clearly creates an illogical, impossible, impractical, or patently unreasonable result related to the proposed property and development? Erin Dudley 2600 NE 11th Street Bentonville, AR 72712 10/16/2025 edudley@ceieng.com 479.321.0035 Tuskawilla Retail Partners II, LLC c/o Catalyst Development Partners 4400 Marsh Landing Blvd., Suite 203 Jacksonville, FL 32250 robm@catalystdp.com 678.515.5376 7Brew Drive Thru Coffee Shop E Florida 434 & Michael Blake Blvd., Winter Springs FL 32708 26-20-30-5AR-00A00-007L 0.5ac portion of 8.03ac lot vacant Requesting waiver for the required twenty-seven (27) streetscape area requirements as listed in Article VII. - S.R. 434 and Tuskawilla Road Streetscape Requirements - Section 20-601(b). Please refer to Letter of Intent for request details. The proposed site design accommodates the best use of the space available. Enforcing the specific individual spacing requirements for the sidewalk and landscape buffer/width areas, would be impossible due to site space constraints. 444 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 customerservice@winterspringsfl.org Application – Waiver 01/2024 Page 3 of 6 Demonstrate that the proposed development plan is in substantial compliance with Chapter 20 of the City’s Code of Ordinances and in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan? Will the proposed development plan significantly enhance the real property? Will the proposed development plan serve the public health, safety, and welfare of the City of Winter Springs? Will the waiver diminish property values in or alter the essential character of the surrounding neighborhood? Is the waiver request the minimum waiver that will eliminate or reduce the illogical, impossible, impractical, or patently unreasonable result caused by the applicable term or condition under Chapter 20 – Zoning? Yes, the proposed development is designed with the surrounding community interest for public access, drive functionality and pedestrian safety in mind. The proposed landscaping buffer/width area and provided sidewalk assist to enhance the aesthetics of the development as well. No, the property value will be sustained if not built upon with the considerable site design constraints. Yes Yes. The property is currently a vacant parcel with typical vegetation. The proposed develop will enhance the surrounding neighborhood both with providing the public with accessible consumable items but also bringing growth and development to the community. The property as-is does not serve any public interest. The site meets the requirements of the Code of Ordinances and is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan with the exception of the proposed waiver regarding the landscape buffer/width and sidewalk area. The development itself captures the intent of the higher intensity of mixed uses that the T5 Zoning District is designed for and fits within the vision of fairly small blocks with wide sidewalks and fulfills the necessary landscaping needs. 445 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 customerservice@winterspringsfl.org Application – Waiver 01/2024 Page 4 of 6 Is the proposed development plan compatible and harmonious with the surrounding neighborhood? List all witnesses that the applicant intends to present to the City Commission to provide testimony: Describe with specificity any evidence which the applicant intends to present to the City Commission, including oral factual testimony, maps, photographs, records or reports and/or expert testimony: Attach all documentary evidence which the applicant intends to present to the city commission to the back of this application. The Applicant has a continuing duty to update the list of witnesses, description of evidence, and documentary evidence throughout the application process. Additional witnesses or evidence will not be admitted at the city commission hearing if not submitted at least seven (7) days prior to such hearing Yes, the proposed site is located within the T-5 Urban Center Zoning which is comprised of the core of the Town Center and is synonymous with the City's Urban Central Business District. It is understood that the designation of this site shall consist of a higher intensity mix of uses. The intent of this project site is to provide a business intended on servicing the local community with competitive and affordable products and falls within the purpose of the zoning designation and surrounding developments. Project Manager, Erin Dudley of CEI Engineering Associates, Inc and 7Venture Representative Site plans, landscape plans, elevations w/materials proposed, legal description/site survey information, site environmental/geotech reports (if requested), Overall Development plans, as needed. Development staff will be available for any presented questions or testimony as required. 446 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 customerservice@winterspringsfl.org Application – Waiver 01/2024 Page 5 of 6 REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION ___ A complete Application and Fee ___ A general description of the relief sought under this division ___ A brief explanation, with applicable supporting competent substantial evidence and documents, as to why the application satisfies the relevant criteria set forth in this division ___ A Legal Description accompanied by a certified survey or the portion of the map maintained by the Seminole County Property Appraiser reflecting the boundaries of the subject property (To scale). ___ An Excel mailing list with the names and addresses of each property owner within 500 ft. of each property line, along with the HOA Associations within 1/2 mile of each property line. ___ For all new commercial development and new residential subdivisions of ten (10) or more lots or existing commercial buildings being altered by 50 percent or greater of the original floor plan or seating capacity and requiring a modified site plan, or development agreements process under section 20-28.1 of the City Code, or as otherwise deemed applicable by the city to relevantly and competently examine an application for compliance with the city code and the affect and impact the proposed use will have on neighborhood and surrounding properties, applicants shall be required to submit with the following additional information referenced in Chapter 20 – Zoning Sec.20.29 Applications (7) – (11). X X X X X 447 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 customerservice@winterspringsfl.org Application – Waiver 01/2024 Page 6 of 6 CITY LIMITED RIGHT OF ENTRY: By submitting this Application you hereby grant temporary right of entry for City Officials to enter upon the subject property for purposes of evaluating this Application and posting on the subject property. APPLICANT’S AUTHORIZATION: I desire to make Application for a Waiver for the aforementioned project and have read and agree to the terms contained herein. In addition, if the Applicant is a corporate entity, the undersigned hereby represents and warrants that he/she is authorized to act on behalf of, and bind, the corporate entity. Applicant Name (Print): Applicant Signature: Date: Business Name: Address: Parcel ID: STATE OF COUNTY OF Date The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification and who did/did not take an oath. Date: (seal): Notary Public Signature: My Commission Expires: Note: The Property Owner shall sign and have their signature notarized below if the Applicant is not the owner of the subject property. Property Owner’s Name (Print): Property Owner Signature: STATE OF COUNTY OF Date The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification and who did/did not take an oath. Date: (seal): Notary Public Signature: My Commission expires: Erin Dudley - CEI Engineering - Project Manager 10/16/2025 CEI Engineering Associates Inc 2600 NE 11th Suite 300 Bentonville, AR 72712 26-20-30-5AR-00A00-007L See attached Owner Authorization 448 Property Owner Tuskawilla Retail Partners II, LLC Parcel 26-20-30-5AR-0A00-007L Legal Description: Parcel 1 Lot 8, Block A D R MITCHELLS SURVEY OF THE LEVY GRANT Authorized Applicant: CEI Engineering Associates Inc 44 9