Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025 10 13 Public Hearing 401 - Winter Springs Marketplace Additional ParkingPUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM 401 CITY COMMISSION AGENDA | OCTOBER 13, 2025 REGULAR MEETING TITLE Winter Springs Marketplace Additional Parking – Site/Final Engineering and Development Agreement. SUMMARY The development site consists of undeveloped land that is currently part of the Winter Springs Marketplace development. The applicant is proposing to modify the existing parking area and stormwater pond by proposing 10 additional parking spaces for the adjacent Wawa development. The existing site was permitted under the Winter Springs Marketplace (2021-00002152). This site plan was submitted simultaneously with the Wawa at Winter Springs Marketplace Site Plan (FEDP-2025-0016). FUNDING SOURCE RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Commission recommend approval of the Site/Final Engineering and Development Agreement, subject to the following conditions of approval: 1. Execution of the Development Agreement. 2. Construction on the site shall not begin until the stormwater permit from St. Johns River Water Management District is approved. 3. All grass on the Property shall be Bahia grass. No St. Augustine grass or grass types with low drought tolerance shall be permitted. 1287 TITLE Winter Springs Marketplace Additional Parking – Site/Final Engineering and Development Agreement. SUMMARY The Community Development Department requests that the City Commission hold a Public Hearing to consider Site/Final Engineering and Development Agreement regarding the applicant’s request to add parking and make changes to Robert Family Lane in the Town Center District, T5 Transect. General Information Applicant Tuskawilla Property Investors, LLC Property Owner(s) WINTER SPRINGS NET, LLC Location 180 Tuskawilla Rd Tract Size 1.22 Acres Parcel ID Number 36-20-30-502-0000-0090 Zoning Designation Town Center District, T-5 Transect FLUM Designation Town Center District Adjacent Land Use North: State Road 419/434 East: Tuskawilla Rd South: Winter Springs Marketplace West: Winter Springs Marketplace Height Not applicable Setbacks Front: 25 ft, minimum, 50 ft. maximum Rear: 15 ft. minimum Side: 5 ft. minimum, 100 ft. maximum Development Standards Lot Coverage 100% Development Permits Not applicable Development Agreement Pending PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM CITY COMMISSION MONDAY, OCTOBER 13, 2025 REGULAR MEETING 1288 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M | M O N D A Y , O C T O B E R 1 3 , 2 0 2 5 , | P A G E 2 OF 8 Code Enforcement Not applicable City Liens Not applicable Background Data: The development site consists of undeveloped land that is currently part of the Winter Springs Marketplace development. The applicant is proposing to modify the existing parking area and stormwater pond by proposing 10 additional parking spaces for the adjacent Wawa development. The existing site was permitted under the Winter Springs Marketplace (2021-00002152). This site plan was submitted simultaneously with the Wawa at Winter Springs Marketplace Site Plan (FEDP- 2025-0016). Public Notices: Notices were mailed to all owners of real property adjacent to and within approximately five-hundred (500) feet of the subject property and all Homeowner’s Associations on file with the City of Winter on July 29, 2025. A Community Workshop was held on June 30, 2025 at 7:00 PM at The Foundry Church. There were no objections raised at the Community Workshop regarding the proposed development. Please see (Figure “1”) Community Workshop Flyer and (Figure “2”) Community Workshop Attendance. Analysis of Final Engineering Plans (Sec. 20-33.1) Criteria: The criteria for Final Engineering Plans are provided and analyzed below: (a) Site and final engineering plans and the subdivision of land shall also be subject to the technical requirements set forth in Chapter 9 of the City Code. It is the intent of this section to apply to applications for site and final engineering plans and to any subdivision of land requiring a plat, if applicable, and does not include review and approval of a lot split application. Please see the discussion below regarding technical requirements of Chapter 9. The Final Engineering Plans have been reviewed by the City’s contract engineer, who concluded that the Plans satisfy the technical requirements. provided the conditions of approval set forth below are met. (b) Except in situations involving one (1) single-family home, the Planning and Zoning Board shall be required to review all site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land applications and make a written recommendation to the city commission. Such recommendation shall include the reasons for the board's recommendation and show the board has considered the applicable criteria set forth in this section. 1289 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M | M O N D A Y , O C T O B E R 1 3 , 2 0 2 5 , | P A G E 3 OF 8 (c) Upon receipt of the planning and zoning board's recommendation, the city commission shall make a final decision on the application. If the city commission determines that the planning and zoning board has not made a recommendation on an application within a reasonable period of time, the city commission may, at its discretion, consider an application without the planning and zoning board's recommendation. Except in situations involving one (1) single-family home, all site and final engineering plan and subdivision recommendations and final decisions shall be based on whether the site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land complies with all the technical requirements set forth in chapter 9 of the City Code and the following criteria to the extent applicable: (1) Whether the applicant has demonstrated the site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land, including its proposed density, height, scale and intensity, hours of operation, building and lighting design, setbacks, buffers, noise, refuse, odor, particulates, smoke, fumes and other emissions, parking and traffic - generating characteristics, number of persons anticipated using, residing or working under the plan, and other off-site impacts, is compatible and harmonious with adjacent land uses, and will not adversely impact land use activities in the immediate vicinity. Analysis: Subject to the Conditions of Approval, Staff finds that the proposed Development is compatible and harmonious with adjacent land uses and will not adversely impact land use activities in the immediate vicinity. (2) Whether the applicant has demonstrated the size and shape of the site, the proposed access and internal circulation, and the design enhancements to be adequate to accommodate the proposed density, scale and intensity of the site and final engineering plan requested. The site shall be of sufficient size to accommodate design amenities such as screening, buffers, landscaping, open space, off-street parking, safe and convenient automobile, bicycle, and pedestrian mobility at the site, and other similar site plan improvements needed to mitigate against potential adverse impacts of the proposed use. Analysis: Staff finds that the Applicant has demonstrated that the size and shape of the site, the proposed access and internal circulation, and the design enhancements to be adequate to accommodate the proposed density, scale, and intensity of the site and final engineering plan requested for the reasons described above. (3) Whether the proposed site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land will have an adverse impact on the local economy, including governmental fiscal impact, employment, and property values. Analysis: Staff finds that the proposed site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land will not have an adverse impact on the local economy, including governmental fiscal impact, employment, and property values. 1290 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M | M O N D A Y , O C T O B E R 1 3 , 2 0 2 5 , | P A G E 4 O F 8 (4) Whether the proposed site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land will have an adverse impact on the natural environment, including air, water, and noise pollution, vegetation and wildlife, open space, noxious and desirable vegetation, and flood hazards. Analysis: Staff finds that the proposed site and final engineering plan will not have an adverse impact on the natural environment, including air, water, and noise pollution, vegetation and wildlife, open space, noxious and desirable vegetation, and flood hazards. The project is located outside of the special flood hazard area. Adequate stormwater detention will be provided for the project both on-site and through the stormwater system for the Winter Springs Marketplace development, of which this development is a part. Please see Figure “3“, Site Plan. An Environmental Site Assessment was provided for the site that dates from 2020. As the property has since been developed, additional studies have not been conducted. Please see Figure “5“, Environmental Report. (5) Whether the proposed site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land will have an adverse impact on historic, scenic, and cultural resources, including views and vistas, and loss or degradation of cultural and historic resources. Analysis: The proposed site and final engineering plan will have no impact on historical resources. No additional scenic or cultural resources. Including scenic views or vistas, will be impacted by this site and final engineering plan. (6) Whether the proposed site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land will have an adverse impact on public services, including water, sewer, stormwater and surface water management, police, fire, parks and recreation, streets, public transportation, marina and waterways, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Analysis: City Staff have reviewed this project from a planning and engineering perspective. Staff did not find any adverse impact on any of the public services listed above. (7) Whether the site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land, and related traffic report and plan provided by the applicant, details safe and efficient means of ingress and egress into and out of the neighborhood and adequately addresses the impact of projected traffic on the immediate neighborhood, traffic circulation pattern for the neighborhood, and traffic flow through immediate intersections and arterials. Analysis: Transportation questions were not considered with this site plan as they were not relevant to the addition of the ten parking spaces and changes to the stormwater pond. (8) Whether the proposed site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land will have an adverse impact on housing and social conditions, including variety of housing unit types and prices, and neighborhood quality. 1291 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M | M O N D A Y , O C T O B E R 1 3 , 2 0 2 5 , | P A G E 5 OF 8 Analysis: As a commercial project, the proposed site and final engineering plan will not have an adverse impact on the variety of housing unit types and prices. As for neighborhood quality, subject to the Conditions of Approval, the proposed site and final engineering plan development will not have an adverse impact on neighborhood quality. See Figure “3”, Winter Springs Marketplace Final Engineering and Development Plan. (9) Whether the proposed site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land avoids significant adverse odor, emission, noise, glare, and vibration impacts on adjacent and surrounding lands regarding refuse collection, service delivery, parking and loading, signs, lighting, and other site elements. Analysis: Staff finds that proposed site and final engineering plan avoids significant adverse odor, emissions, noise, glare and vibration impacts on adjacent and surrounding lands regarding refuse collection, service delivery, parking and loading, signs, lighting, and other site elements. (10) Whether the applicant has provided an acceptable security plan for the proposed establishment to be located on the site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land that addresses the safety and security needs of the establishment and its users and employees and minimizes impacts on the neighborhood, if applicable. Analysis: A security plan is not applicable to the addition of parking spaces and changes to a stormwater pond. (11) Whether the applicant has provided on the site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land an acceptable plan for the mass delivery of merchandise for new large footprint buildings (greater than twenty thousand (20,000) square feet) including the hours of operation for delivery trucks to come into and exit the property and surrounding neighborhood, if applicable. Analysis: Not applicable. The project does not involve a large footprint building. (12) Whether the applicant has demonstrated that the site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land have been designed to incorporate mitigative techniques and plans needed to prevent adverse impacts addressed in the criteria stated herein or to adjacent and surrounding uses and properties. Analysis: Staff finds that subject to the Conditions of Approval, the site and final engineering plans have been designed to incorporate mitigative techniques and plans needed to prevent the adverse impacts mentioned in the criteria on adjacent and surrounding uses and properties. (13) If the proposed conditional use is a residential use, whether the elementary, middle and high schools (K—12) that will be initially assigned to the residential project by the school district at the time the city commission considers final 1292 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M | M O N D A Y , O C T O B E R 1 3 , 2 0 2 5 , | P A G E 6 O F 8 approval of the conditional use have both sufficient capacity, are in close proximity to the project so as to make each of the assigned schools accessible and convenient (e.g., walking distance, travel time, private and public transportation, and quality of route environment) to the majority of the school population that will be drawn from the project, and promote and support the integration of future residents of the project into the existing city of Winter Springs community in a sustainable manner. Analysis: Not applicable. This is not a residential development. (14) Whether the applicant has agreed to execute a binding development agreement required by city to incorporate the terms and conditions of approval deemed necessary by the city commission including, but not limited to, any mitigative techniques and plans required by City Code. Analysis: The applicant has agreed to and is working on a binding development agreement with the City addressing terms and conditions deemed necessary by the City Commission. Water and Sewer: Not applicable for this project as water and sewer are not required. Stormwater: The applicant included a Drainage and Grading plan as part of the Final Engineering/Site Plan (Figure “3”). Staff have reviewed and approved the information necessary from this development. However, the applicant will also need to receive approval from the St Johns River Water Management District and this approval is included as part of the Conditions of Approval. Transportation: Not applicable for this project. A Traffic Impact Analysis was included with FEDP- 2025-0016 for Wawa. Parking: The Town Center does not have minimum required parking standards, however, the applicant provided documentation (Figure “4”) that it would provide an additional ten (“10”) parking spaces to meet the needs of the Marketplace. Reports: The Final Engineering submittal is required to include the following reports or updates of previously prepared reports for the same property. Reports August 4, 2020 Environmental Report (Figure “5”) December 15, 2020 Geotechnical Report (Figure “6”) December 6, 2024 Parking Analysis (Figure “4”) 1293 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M | M O N D A Y , O C T O B E R 1 3 , 2 0 2 5 , | P A G E 7 OF 8 Procedural History: May 6, 2025 Pre-Application Meeting June 30, 2025 Community Workshop August 7, 2025 Planning & Zoning Board | Recommendation on Site/Final Engineering Plan and Development Agreement. August 25, 2025 City Commission | Hearing on Final Engineering Site/Final Engineering Plan and Development Agreement. Applicable Law, Public Policy, and Events: Florida Statutes 163.2511-163.3246: Growth Policy; County and Municipal Planning; Land Development Regulation (Provides that land development regulations for municipal planning be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan). Home Rule Powers Code of Ordinances City of Winter Springs. Section 20-1. Definitions. Fiscal Impact: A Fiscal Impact Statement was not required for this part of the development. Development Agreement: The Applicant is currently working with the City Attorney on the Development Agreement for the project. The Development Agreement shall be executed prior to any work on the project covered within this document. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Commission recommend approval of the Site/Final Engineering and Development Agreement, subject to the following conditions of approval: 1. Execution of the Development Agreement. 2. Construction on the site shall not begin until the stormwater permit from St. Johns River Water Management District is approved. 3. All grass on the Property shall be Bahia grass. No St. Augustine grass or grass types with low drought tolerance shall be permitted. 1294 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M | M O N D A Y , O C T O B E R 1 3 , 2 0 2 5 , | P A G E 8 OF 8 Attachments: Figure “1” – Community Workshop Flyer Figure “2” – Community Workshop Attendance Sheet Figure “3” – Site Plan Figure “4“ – Parking Study Figure “5 “ – Environmental Report Figure “6” – Geotechnical Report Figure “7” – Development Agreement Figure “8” – Site Plan Application Figure “9” – Development Agreement Application 1295 THIRD MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Tuscawilla Property Investors, LLC Page 1 of 11 THIS INSTRUMENT WAS PREPARED BY AND SHOULD BE RETURNED TO: Anthony A. Garganese City Attorney of Winter Springs Garganese, Weiss, D'Agresta & Salzman, P.A. 111 N. Orange Avenue, Suite 2000 Orlando, FL 32802 (407) 425-9566 THIRD MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT AND PROPERTY DIVISION AGREEMENT (Winter Springs Marketplace – Additional Parking and Modifications to Robert Family Lane) THIS THIRD MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT AND PROPERTY DIVISION AGREEMENT (“Third Modification”) is made and executed this ______ day of _________________, 2025, by and between the CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, a Florida Municipal Corporation (“City”), whose address is 1126 East S.R. 434, Winter Springs, Florida 32708, and THISTLEWOOD WINTER SPRINGS, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, whose address is 677 King Street, 3rd Floor, Charleston, SC 29403 and WINTER SPRINGS NET, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, whose address is 6525 3rd Street, Suite 409, Rockledge, Florida 32955 (collectively “Owners”). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Owners’ predecessor in interest, Tuscawilla Property Investors, LLC, and the City entered into and executed that certain Development and Property Division Agreement for Winter Springs Marketplace, dated March 8, 2021, and recorded in the Official Records of Seminole County at Book 9887, Pages 718-751 (the “Development Agreement”) as well as that certain First Modification to the Development and Property Division Agreement for Winter Springs Marketplace, dated January 30, 2023, and recorded in the Official Records of Seminole County at Book 10397, Pages 628-643 (the “First Modification”), and that certain Second Modification to the Development and Property Division Agreement for Winter Springs Marketplace, dated __________, and recorded in the Official Records of Seminole County at Book _________, Pages _____________ (the “Second Modification”); and WHEREAS, the Development Agreement governs the development of the Winter Springs Marketplace shopping center, consisting of both the Property and Trust Property, as legally described and defined therein, the Trust Property having been conveyed to Tuscawilla Property FOR RECORDING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY 1296 THIRD MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Tuscawilla Property Investors, LLC Page 2 of 11 Investors subsequent to the execution and recordation of the Development Agreement, and the Trust Property being more particularly described in Exhibit “D” of the Development Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Property and Trust Property have been subdivided and are no longer entirely owned by Tuscawilla Property Investors, LLC; and WHEREAS, as described in the Second Modification, Tuscawilla Property Investors, LLC, desires to construct a Wawa neighborhood convenience store with gas pumps on the Resulting Trust Property Parcel #2, as more particularly described in Exhibit “G” of the Second Modification; and WHEREAS, Tuscawilla Property Investors, LLC, as authorized by the Owners, further desires to modify the existing parking area of the Winter Springs Marketplace development by adding an additional 10 parking spaces which will be available to service the proposed Wawa development located upon the Resulting Trust Property Parcel #2, and by remodeling a portion of Roberts Family Lane which services the Property and Trust Property, as more particularly described and depicted on Exhibit “J,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (hereinafter the “Parking and Access Improvements”); and WHEREAS, the Parking and Access Improvements are located on a portion of the Property within the Winter Springs Marketplace now owned by the Owners; and WHEREAS, Section 20-29(c) of the City Code requires that all site plans shall be binding on the use of the subject property; and WHEREAS, this Third Modification shall be recorded against a portion of the Property described herein so that the terms and conditions of approval shall run with the land; and NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties mutually agree as follows: 1.0 Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated herein by this reference. 2.0 Authority. This Third Modification is entered into pursuant to the Florida Municipal Home Rule Powers Act. 3.0 The Project Area. The real property that is the subject of this Third Modification is legally described in EXHIBIT “I,” attached hereto and fully incorporated herein by this reference for convenience (the “Improvements Project Area”). 4.0 Project Description and Requirements; Phasing. Tuscawilla Property Investors has constructed Phases I and II of the Winter Springs Marketplace shopping center on the Property, as well as supporting infrastructure, stormwater pond, parking lots, and landscaping. Owners intend to construct certain improvements, consisting of ten (10) additional parking spaces in the 1297 THIRD MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Tuscawilla Property Investors, LLC Page 3 of 11 Improvements Project Area and certain improvements to Roberts Family Lane, as depicted in Exhibit “J.” (Hereinafter, all project description and requirements and references to the “Parking and Access Improvements” shall refer to the additional parking spaces and the associated improvements to Roberts Family Lane). Owners shall construct the Parking and Access Improvements in a manner consistent with the approved Final Engineering/Site Plans that are on file with the City with the following file numbers and consistent with the requirements contained in this Third Modification: File Nos: FEDP-2025-0017. FINAL ENGINEERING/SITE PLAN. The overall Final Engineering/Site Plan for the Parking and Access Improvements is attached hereto as EXHIBIT “J” for convenience and incorporated herein by this reference. 5.0 Conditions of Approval. Specific conditions of approval for the above-referenced Final Engineering Plans include the following, which are also addressed in the staff report for the Final Engineering/Site Plans: a. All grass areas in the Improvements Project Area shall use Bahia grass. No St. Augustine grass or any grass type with low drought tolerance shall be permitted. b. Construction of the Parking and Access Improvements shall not commence until appropriate permitting has been obtained from the St. Johns River Water Management District, to the extent required. 6.0 Termination of Approval as to Parking and Access Improvements. In the event the Owners or their authorized agents fail to obtain the building permit and substantially commence construction of the Parking and Access Improvements within two (2) years of the Effective Date of this Third Modification, then the City shall have the right to terminate and/or void the approvals set forth herein and require the Owners to reapply to the City. The Owners may apply to the City Commission for an extension of this deadline, which may be granted upon good cause shown. 7.0 Representations of the Parties. The City and Owners hereby each represent and warrant to the other that it has the power and authority to execute, deliver and perform the terms and provisions of this Third Modification and has taken all necessary action to authorize the execution, delivery and performance of this Third Modification. The Owners further agrees and make the following representations and warranties to the City: A. The Owners are lawfully seized of the Improvements Project Area property in fee simple and has full and lawful authority to execute this Third Modification and bind the Improvements Project Area property as set forth herein. 1298 THIRD MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Tuscawilla Property Investors, LLC Page 4 of 11 This Third Modification will, when duly executed and delivered by the City and Owners, constitute a legal, valid and binding obligation enforceable against the parties hereto. Upon recording of this Third Modification in the Public Records of Seminole County, Florida, the Third Modification shall be a binding obligation upon the Improvements Project Area property in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Owners represent that it has voluntarily and willfully executed this Third Modification for purposes of binding himself and the Project Area property to the terms and conditions set forth in this Third Modification. 8.0 Successors and Assigns. This Third Modification shall automatically be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the City and Owners and their respective successors and assigns. The terms and conditions of this Third Modification similarly shall be binding upon the Improvements Project Area property, and shall run with title to the same upon being duly recorded against the Improvements Project Area property by the City. 9.0 Effective Date. This Third Modification shall become effective upon approval by the City Commission and execution by all parties hereto. 10.0 Recordation. Upon full execution by the Parties, this Third Modification shall be recorded in the Public Records of Seminole County, Florida by the City and shall be binding upon the Improvements Project Area property and all future owners thereof. 11.0 Effect of Modification. All other terms and conditions of the Development Agreement, First Modification, and Second Modification not in conflict with this Third Modification, shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands and seal on the date first above written. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS By: Kevin McCann, Mayor ATTEST: By: Christian Gowan, City Clerk Date: _______________________________ CITY SEAL APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY For the use and reliance of the City of Winter Springs, Florida only. 1299 THIRD MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Tuscawilla Property Investors, LLC Page 5 of 11 Date: By: Anthony A. Garganese, City Attorney for the City of Winter Springs, Florida STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF SEMINOLE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of (___) physical presence or (___) online notarization, this ______ day of ___________, 2025, by Kevin McCann, Mayor of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, a Florida municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation, who is personally known to me or produced ___________________ _______________ as identification. (NOTARY SEAL) (Notary Public Signature) (Print Name) Notary Public, State of Commission No.: My Commission Expires: ________________ Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of the following witnesses: Signature of Witness Printed Name of Witness Signature of Witness Printed Name of Witness WINTER SPRINGS NET, LLC By: Print Name:______________________________ Date: _______________ STATE OF COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of (___) physical presence or (___) online notarization, this ______ day of ___________, 2025, by _______________, the Manager of Winter Springs Net, LLC, a limited liability company, on 1300 THIRD MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Tuscawilla Property Investors, LLC Page 6 of 11 behalf of the company, who is personally known to me or produced ___________________ _______________ as identification. (NOTARY SEAL) (Notary Public Signature) (Print Name) Notary Public, State of Commission No.: My Commission Expires: Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of the following witnesses: Signature of Witness Printed Name of Witness Signature of Witness Printed Name of Witness THISTLEWOOD WINTER SPRINGS, LLC By: Print Name:______________________________ Date: _______________ STATE OF COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of (___) physical presence or (___) online notarization, this ______ day of ___________, 2025, by _______________, the Manager of Thistlewood Winter Springs, LLC, a limited liability company, on behalf of the company, who is personally known to me or produced ___________________ _______________ as identification. (NOTARY SEAL) (Notary Public Signature) (Print Name) Notary Public, State of Commission No.: My Commission Expires: OWNERS ARE HEREBY ADVISED THAT SHOULD OWNERS FAIL TO FULLY EXECUTE, AND DELIVER TO THE CITY, THIS AGREEMENT WITHIN THIRTY (30) 1301 THIRD MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Tuscawilla Property Investors, LLC Page 7 of 11 DAYS FROM THE DATE THAT THE CITY COMMISSION APPROVES THIS AGREEMENT, THIS AGREEMENT, AND THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPROVALS REFERENCED HEREUNDER, SHALL AUTOMATICALLY BE DEEMED NULL AND VOID. 1302 THIRD MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Tuscawilla Property Investors, LLC Page 8 of 11 EXHIBIT I LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT AREA Lots 1, 3, and Tract C of the Winter Springs Marketplace plat, recorded in the Plat Book of Seminole County, Book 88, Page 5. 1303 THIRD MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Tuscawilla Property Investors, LLC Page 9 of 11 EXHIBIT J OVERALL SITE PLAN FOR PARKING AND ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS 1304 THIRD MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Tuscawilla Property Investors, LLC Page 10 of 11 JOINDER AND CONSENT For and in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms, and conditions and restrictions contained herein, together with other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, One Florida Bank, a Florida banking corporation, as holder of that certain Mortgage and Security Agreement, which is recorded in Official Records Book 10171, Page 569 of the Public Records of Seminole County, Florida, as modified or affected by that certain Assignment of Leases and Rents, recorded in Official Records Book 10171, Page 585, that certain First Modification of Mortgage and Assignment of Leases and Rents, recorded in Official Records Book 10435, Page 458, that certain UCC-1 Financing Statement recorded in Official Records Book 10171, Page 593, and that certain UCC-1 Financing Statement Amendment, which is recorded in Official Records Book 10435, Page 461, and that certain Notice Pursuant to Florida Statutes, Section 713.10, recorded in Official Records Book 10435, Page 464, all of the Public Records of Seminole County, Florida (collectively, the “Mortgage”,) hereby joins in and consents to the foregoing Third Modification to the Development and Property Division Agreement by and between the City of Winter Springs, a Florida municipal corporation, and Thistlewood Winter Springs, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, and Winter Springs Net, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, and further acknowledges and agrees that its Mortgage shall be subordinated to such Third Modification to the Development and Property Division Agreement and the obligations contained therein. Dated this _______ day of ______, 2025. 1305 THIRD MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Tuscawilla Property Investors, LLC Page 11 of 11 Signed and sealed in the presence of: Print Name: Address: ____________________________ Print Name: By: ___________________________________ Name: Title : Address: ______________________________ STATE OF COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of (___) physical presence or (___) online notarization, this ______ day of ___________, 2025, by __________, the _____________ of _____________________, a _______________, on behalf of the company, who is personally known to me or produced ___________________ _______________ as identification. (NOTARY SEAL) (Notary Public Signature) (Print Name) Notary Public, State of Commission No.: My Commission Expires: 1306 COMMUNITY WORKSHOP Date: June 30, 2025 @ 6:00 P.M. Location: The Foundry Church – Classroom 5 1491 E. State Road 434, Winter Springs, FL 32708 Community Workshop to consider Final Engineering Site Plans, Aesthetic Review and Conditional Use in order to construct a 4,736 sq. ft. gas station/convenience store in the Winter Springs Marketplace within the Town Center District on the subject site. Project: Wawa gas station/convenient store Location: SW corner of Tuskawilla Road and E. State Road 434 Parcel ID: 36-20-30-502-0000-0090 Acreage: ± 1.22-acre project Zoning: Town Center District (T5) Future Land Use: Town Center (TC) Applicant/Presenter: Ryan Stahl, Scott Kearney, Kimley-Horn Associates 1307 13 0 8 PREPARED BY AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH N.T.S. NORTH NORTH WI N T E R S P R I N G S M A R K E T P L A C E - AD D I T I O N A L P A R K I N G K- H P R O J E C T # 1 4 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 07 / 1 8 / 2 0 2 5 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FL JULY 2025 WINTER SPRINGS MARKETPLACE- ADDITIONAL PARKING OWNER/DEVELOPER TUSCAWILLA PROPERTY INVESTORS LLC. 630 S. MAITLAND AVE., SUITE 100 MAITLAND, FL 32751 CONTACT: RYAN STAHL PHONE: (407) 628-0077 EMAIL: Rstahl@equinox-development.com ENGINEER KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 200 S. ORANGE AVE., SUITE 600 ORLANDO, FL 32801 CONTACT: CORY SITLER, P.E. PHONE: (407) 427-1612 EMAIL: cory.sitler@kimley-horn.com PARCEL 1: LOT 7, JOE E. JOHNSTON'S SURVEY, RECORDED IN DEED BOOK 147, PAGE 221, PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND ALSO BEING THAT PART OF THE UNPLATTED PART OF BLOCK B OF D. R. MITCHELL‘S SURVEY OF THE LEVY GRANT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 5, PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 186 FEET NORTH 38 DEGREES 45 MINUTES WEST OF THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF THAT PART OF SAID BLOCK B LYING SOUTHWEST OF THE SANFORD-OVIEDO ROAD AND RUNNING NORTH 38 DEGREES 45 MINUTES WEST, 200 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE SANFORD-OVIEDO; THENCE SOUTH 51 DEGREES 15 MINUTES WEST 650.30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 22 DEGREES 15 MINUTES EAST 208.8 FEET; THENCE NORTH 51 DEGREES 15 MINUTES EAST 710.14 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; LESS AND EXCEPT THAT PART TAKEN FOR ROAD RIGHT OF WAY BY THE ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2803, PAGE 1023, PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 2: THAT PART OF THE UNPLATTED PART OF BLOCK B OF D. R. MITCHELL'S SURVEY OF THE LEVY GRANT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 5, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 186 FEET NORTH 38 DEGREES 45 MINUTES WEST OF THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF THAT PART OF SAID BLOCK B LYING SOUTHWEST OF THE SANFORD-OVIEDO HIGHWAY AND RUNNING NORTH 38 DEGREES 45 MINUTES WEST 200 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE SANFORD-OVIEDO HIGHWAY; THENCE SOUTH 51 DEGREES 15 MINUTES WEST 710.14 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 22 DEGREES 15 MINUTES EAST 208 FEET; THENCE NORTH 51 DEGREES 15 MINUTES EAST 770 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; LESS AND EXCEPT THAT PART TAKEN FOR ROAD RIGHT OF WAY BY THE ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2831, PAGE 1024, PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 3: THAT PART OF THE UNPLATTED PART OF BLOCK B OF D. R. MITCHELL'S SURVEY OF THE LEVY GRANT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 5, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF THAT PART OF SAID BLOCK B LYING SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE SANFORD-OVIEDO HIGHWAY AND RUNNING NORTH 38 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 16 SECONDS WEST 186.0 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE SANFORD-OVIEDO HIGHWAY; THENCE SOUTH 51 DEGREES 15 MINUTES WEST 770.0 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 22 DEGREES 15 MINUTES EAST, 13.5 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE UNPLATTED PART OF BLOCK B; THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF TUSKAWILLA, A DISTANCE OF 497.0 FEET; THENCE NORTH 30 DEGREES EAST 420.0 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; ALSO DESCRIBED AS LOT 9, ACCORDING TO JOE E. JOHNSTON'S SURVEY AS RECORDED IN DEED BOOK 147, PAGE 221, PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA. TOGETHER WITH THE WEST HALF OF THE VACATED STREET ADJACENT ON THE EAST AS SET FORTH IN RESOLUTION RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2972, PAGE 373, PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA; LESS AND EXCEPT ROAD RIGHTS OF WAY AS SET FORTH IN ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2831, PAGE 1024, AND WARRANTY DEED TO SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 8377, PAGE 27, PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 4: THAT PART OF LOT 8 BLOCK A, D. R. MITCHELL'S SURVEY OF THE LEVY GRANT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 5, PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LYING WESTERLY FROM THE WESTERLY FIFTY FEET FROM THE CENTER LINE OF TUSKAWILLA ROAD; TOGETHER WITH THE EAST HALF OF THE VACATED STREET ADJACENT ON THE WEST AS SET FORTH IN RESOLUTION RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2972, PAGE 373, PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA; LESS AND EXCEPT ROAD RIGHTS OF WAY AS SET FORTH IN WARRANTY DEED TO COUNTY OF SEMINOLE RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1571, PAGE 707; ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2831, PAGE 1024; AND WARRANTY DEED TO SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 8377, PAGE 27, PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 200 S. ORANGE AVE., SUITE 600 ORLANDO, FL 32801 CONTACT: SCOTT MINGONET, PLA, AICP PHONE: (407) 898-1511 EMAIL: scott.mingonet@kimley-horn.com SURVEYOR IRELAND & ASSOCIATES SURVEYING, INC 800 CURRENCY CIRCLE, SUITE 1020 LAKE MARY, FL 32746 CONTACT: PATRICK IRELAND, P.L.S. PHONE: (407) 678-3366 EMAIL: shannosurv@aol.com FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOCATION MAP N.T.S. SECTION 09, TOWNSHIP 22S, RANGE 26E NORTH PROJECT TEAM PROJECT LOCATION PARCEL #01-21-30-5VK-0C00-0000SEMINOLE COUNTY, CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FL P R O F E S SIONA L E N G INEER« «« C O R Y N. SITLER No. 89984 STATE OF F LO R I D A L I C E NS E SHEET INDEX SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE C0.0 COVER SHEET C1.0 GENERAL NOTES C1.1 GENERAL NOTES C2.0 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS C2.1 SWPPP NOTES C3.0 OVERALL EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DEMOLITION PLAN C3.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DEMOLITION PLAN C3.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DEMOLITION PLAN C4.0 OVERALL SITE PLAN C4.1 SITE PLAN C4.2 SITE PLAN C5.0 OVERALL PAVING GRADING & DRAINAGE C5.1 PAVING GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C5.2 PAVING GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C6.0 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS L1.00 LANDSCAPE PLAN L1.51 LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS L1.50 LANDSCAPE DETAILS PROJECT LOCATION SITE CIVIL SITE CONSTRUCTION PLANS 13 0 9 Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . BY DA T E AS S H O W N RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E SHEET NUMBER CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T DA T E : LI C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L © 2 0 2 5 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 68 7 6 M A R W I C K L A N E , S U I T E 3 5 0 , O R L A N D O , F L 3 2 8 2 7 PH O N E : ( 4 0 7 ) 5 3 6 - 4 4 4 0 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M R E G I S T R Y N o . 3 5 1 0 6 P R O F E S SIONA L E N G INEER « « « CO R Y N. SITLER No . 8 9 9 8 4 ST A T E O F F LO R I D A L I C E NS E RE V I S E D P E R C I T Y C O M M E N T S 07 / 1 8 / 2 5 MM B 1 Pl o t t e d B y : Bu s b y , M a r y S h e e t S e t : WI N T E R S P R I N G S M A R K E T P L A C E - A D D I T I O N A L P A R K I N G L a y o u t : GE N E R A L N O T E S Ju l y 1 8 , 2 0 2 5 0 8 : 4 9 : 4 5 a m K: \ O R L _ C i v i l \ 1 4 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 - W i n t e r S p r i n g s W a w a \ C A D D \ C O N S T \ P l a n S h e e t s - A d d P a r k i n g \ C 1 . 0 G E N E R A L N O T E S . d w g AD L JC B CN S GENERAL STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM TREES AND VEGETATION DEMOLITION SAFETY EARTHWORK / GRADING / DEMUCKING PROCEDURES DEWATERING NOTES GE N E R A L N O T E S FL CI T Y O F W I N T E R S P R I N G S C1.0 14 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 07 / 1 8 / 2 0 2 5 WI N T E R S P R I N G S MA R K E T P L A C E - AD D I T I O N A L P A R K I N G 1310 Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . BY DA T E AS S H O W N RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E SHEET NUMBER CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T DA T E : LI C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L © 2 0 2 5 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 68 7 6 M A R W I C K L A N E , S U I T E 3 5 0 , O R L A N D O , F L 3 2 8 2 7 PH O N E : ( 4 0 7 ) 5 3 6 - 4 4 4 0 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M R E G I S T R Y N o . 3 5 1 0 6 P R O F E S SIONA L E N G INEER « « « CO R Y N. SITLER No . 8 9 9 8 4 ST A T E O F F LO R I D A L I C E NS E RE V I S E D P E R C I T Y C O M M E N T S 07 / 1 8 / 2 5 MM B 1 Pl o t t e d B y : Bu s b y , M a r y S h e e t S e t : WI N T E R S P R I N G S M A R K E T P L A C E - A D D I T I O N A L P A R K I N G L a y o u t : GE N E R A L N O T E S ( 2 ) Ju l y 1 8 , 2 0 2 5 0 8 : 4 9 : 5 1 a m K: \ O R L _ C i v i l \ 1 4 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 - W i n t e r S p r i n g s W a w a \ C A D D \ C O N S T \ P l a n S h e e t s - A d d P a r k i n g \ C 1 . 0 G E N E R A L N O T E S . d w g GE N E R A L N O T E S FL CI T Y O F W I N T E R S P R I N G S C1.1 14 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 07 / 1 8 / 2 0 2 5 AD L JC B CN S CONTRACTOR'S AS-BUILTPAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PAVING/GRADING TESTING AND INSPECTION F.D.O.T. RIGHT-OF-WAY WORK GENERAL NOTES WI N T E R S P R I N G S MA R K E T P L A C E - AD D I T I O N A L P A R K I N G 1311 FLOATING TURBIDITY BARRIERS TYPE II TYPE I Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . BY DA T E AS S H O W N RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E SHEET NUMBER CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T DA T E : LI C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L © 2 0 2 5 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 68 7 6 M A R W I C K L A N E , S U I T E 3 5 0 , O R L A N D O , F L 3 2 8 2 7 PH O N E : ( 4 0 7 ) 5 3 6 - 4 4 4 0 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M R E G I S T R Y N o . 3 5 1 0 6 P R O F E S SIONA L E N G INEER « « « CO R Y N. SITLER No . 8 9 9 8 4 ST A T E O F F LO R I D A L I C E NS E RE V I S E D P E R C I T Y C O M M E N T S 07 / 1 8 / 2 5 MM B 1 Pl o t t e d B y : Bu s b y , M a r y S h e e t S e t : WI N T E R S P R I N G S M A R K E T P L A C E - A D D I T I O N A L P A R K I N G L a y o u t : ER O S I O N C O N T R O L D E T A I L S Ju l y 1 8 , 2 0 2 5 0 8 : 5 0 : 0 0 a m K: \ O R L _ C i v i l \ 1 4 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 - W i n t e r S p r i n g s W a w a \ C A D D \ C O N S T \ P l a n S h e e t s - A d d P a r k i n g \ C 2 . 0 S W P P P N O T E S . d w g AD L JC B CN S ER O S I O N C O N T R O L DE T A I L S FL CI T Y O F W I N T E R S P R I N G S C2.0 14 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 07 / 1 8 / 2 0 2 5 WI N T E R S P R I N G S MA R K E T P L A C E - AD D I T I O N A L P A R K I N G 1312 -CLEANING SUPPLIES -DETERGENTS -MASONARY BLOCK/BRICKS -PAINT -WOOD ITEMS REQUIRING POLLUTION PREVENTION THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE EXPECTED TO BE PRESENT ON THE PROJECT SITE: -ASPHALT -CONCRETE -FERTILIZERS -METAL PIECES -PETROLEUM BASED PRODUCTS -TAR THE FOLLOWING ARE NON-STORM WATER SOURCES THAT WILL BE ENCOUNTERED AT THE SITE AND SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO THE SEDIMENT BASIN PRIOR TO DISCHARGE: -UNCONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER EXPOSED DURING EXCAVATION -WATER FROM WATER LINE FLUSHING -PAVEMENT WASH WATERS (WHERE NO SPILLS OR LEAKS OF TOXIC OR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HAVE OCCURRED). SPILL PREVENTION AND CONTROL THE FOLLOWING ARE THE MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PRACTICES THAT WILL BE USED TO REDUCE THE RISK OF SPILLS OR OTHER ACCIDENTAL EXPOSURE OF MATERIALS AND SUBSTANCES TO STORM WATER RUNOFF. GOOD HOUSEKEEPING -SUPERINTENDENT SHALL INSPECT PROJECT AREA DAILY FOR PROPER STORAGE, USE, AND DISPOSAL OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS. -STORE ONLY ENOUGH MATERIAL ON SITE FOR PROJECT COMPLETION. -ALL SUBSTANCES SHOULD BE USED BEFORE DISPOSAL OF CONTAINER. -ALL CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS STORED SHALL BE ORGANIZED AND IN THE PROPER CONTAINER AND IF POSSIBLE, STORED UNDER A ROOF OR PROTECTIVE COVER. -PRODUCTS SHALL NOT BE MIXED UNLESS DIRECTED BY THE MANUFACTURER. -ALL PRODUCTS SHALL BE USED AND DISPOSED OF ACCORDING TO THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. HAZARDOUS PRODUCTS -MATERIALS SHOULD BE KEPT IN ORIGINAL CONTAINER WITH LABELS UNLESS THE ORIGINAL CONTAINERS CANNOT BE RESEALED. IF ORIGINAL CONTAINERS CANNOT BE USED, LABELS AND PRODUCT INFORMATION SHALL BE SAVED. -PROPER DISPOSAL PRACTICES SHALL ALWAYS BE FOLLOWED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER AND LOCAL/STATE REGULATIONS. PRODUCT SPECIFIC PRACTICES -PETROLEUM PRODUCTS MUST BE STORED IN PROPER CONTAINERS AND CLEARLY LABELED. VEHICLES CONTAINING PETROLEUM PRODUCTS SHALL BE PERIODICALLY INSPECTED FOR LEAKS. PRECAUTIONS SHALL BE TAKEN TO AVOID LEAKAGE OF PETROLEUM PRODUCTS ON SITE. -THE MINIMUM AMOUNT OF FERTILIZER SHALL BE USED AND MIXED INTO THE SOIL IN ORDER TO LIMIT EXPOSURE TO STORM WATER. FERTILIZERS SHALL BE STORED IN A COVERED SHED. THE CONTENTS OF ANY PARTIALLY USED BAGS OF FERTILIZER SHALL BE TRANSFERRED TO A SEALABLE PLASTIC BIN TO AVOID SPILLS. -PAINT CONTAINERS SHALL BE SEALED AND STORED WHEN NOT IN USE. EXCESS PAINT MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN AN APPROVED MANNER. -CONCRETE TRUCKS SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED TO WASH OUT OR DISCHARGE SURPLUS CONCRETE OR DRUM WASH WATER ON THE SITE. SPILL CONTROL PRACTICES IN ADDITION TO THE GOOD HOUSEKEEPING AND MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PRACTICES DISCUSSED IN THE PREVIOUS SECTIONS OF THIS PLAN, THE FOLLOWING PRACTICES SHALL BE FOLLOWED FOR SPILL PREVENTION AND CLEANUP: -SPILL CLEANUP INFORMATION SHALL BE POSTED ON SITE TO INFORM EMPLOYEES ABOUT CLEANUP PROCEDURES AND RESOURCES. -THE FOLLOWING CLEAN-UP EQUIPMENT MUST BE KEPT ON-SITE NEAR THE MATERIAL STORAGE AREA: GLOVES, MOPS, RAGS, BROOMS, DUST PANS, SAND, SAWDUST, LIQUID ABSORBER, GOGGLES, AND TRASH CONTAINERS. -ALL SPILLS SHALL BE CLEANED UP AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. -WHEN CLEANING A SPILL, THE AREA SHOULD BE WELL VENTILATED AND THE EMPLOYEE SHALL WEAR PROPER PROTECTIVE COVERING TO PREVENT INJURY. -TOXIC SPILLS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE PROPER AUTHORITY REGARDLESS OF THE SIZE OF THE SPILL. -AFTER A SPILL, THE PREVENTION PLAN SHALL BE REVIEWED AND CHANGED TO PREVENT FURTHER SIMILAR SPILLS FROM OCCURRING. THE CAUSE OF THE SPILL, MEASURES TO PREVENT IT, AND HOW TO CLEAN THE SPILL UP SHALL BE RECORDED. -THE SUPERINTENDENT SHALL BE THE SPILL PREVENTION AND CLEANUP COORDINATOR AND IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DAY TO DAY SITE OPERATIONS. THE SUPERINTENDENT ALSO OVERSEES THE SPILL PREVENTION PLAN AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR EDUCATING THE EMPLOYEES ABOUT SPILL PREVENTION AND CLEANUP PROCEDURES. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION PRACTICES THE FOLLOWING ARE MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION PRACTICES THAT SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE CONTRACTOR: -ALL SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL METHODS SHALL BE CHECKED DAILY AND AFTER EACH 0.5 INCH OR GREATER RAINFALL BY THE SUPERINTENDENT OR SOMEONE UNDER HIS/HER DIRECT SUPERVISION. -ALL SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL METHODS SHALL BE KEPT IN GOOD CONDITION. REPAIRS MUST BE MADE WITHIN 24 HOURS OF REPORT. -THE SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSPECTED PERIODICALLY FOR HEIGHT OF SEDIMENT AND CONDITION OF FENCE. -THE SILT FENCE SHALL BE CLEARED OF SEDIMENT WHEN SEDIMENT MEASURES ONE-THIRD THE HEIGHT OF THE FENCE. -THE SEDIMENT BASINS/DITCHES SHALL BE CHECKED MONTHLY FOR DEPTH OF SEDIMENT. THEY SHALL BE CLEANED WHEN SEDIMENT REACHES 10% OF TOTAL CAPACITY AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE. -DIVERSION DIKES SHALL BE INSPECTED MONTHLY. ANY BREACHES SHALL BE PROMPTLY REPAIRED. -ALL SEEDING SHALL BE CHECKED FOR PROPER GROWTH AND UNIFORMITY. UNSTABALIZED AREAS SHALL BE RE-SODDED. -A MAINTENANCE REPORT SHALL BE COMPLETED DAILY AFTER EACH INSPECTION OF THE SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL METHODS. THE REPORTS SHALL BE FILED IN AN ORGANIZED MANNER AND RETAINED ON-SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION. AFTER CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, THE REPORTS SHALL BE SAVED FOR AT LEAST THREE YEARS. THE REPORTS SHALL BE AVAILABLE FOR ANY AGENCY THAT HAS JURISDICTION OVER EROSION CONTROL. -THE SUPERINTENDENT SHALL ORGANIZE THE TRAINING FOR INSPECTION PROCEDURES AND PROPER EROSION CONTROL METHODS FOR EMPLOYEES THAT COMPLETE INSPECTIONS AND REPORTS. ADDITIONAL CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITIES -C.O.R. IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A SWPPP TO THE CITY FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO MOBILIZING TO THE SITE AND INSTALLING ANY BMPS. -C.O.R. IS REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE REGULATIONS OF THE CITY, WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, AND FDEP IN MANAGING STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM CONSTRUCTION SITES. -C.O.R. IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT AND OBTAIN A NOTICE OF INTENT FROM FDEP FOR THIS PROJECT. POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN CERTIFICATION I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF LAW THAT THIS DOCUMENT AND ALL ATTACHMENTS WERE PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECTION OR SUPERVISION IN ACCORDANCE WITH A SYSTEM DESIGNED TO ASSURE THAT QUALIFIED PERSONNEL PROPERLY GATHERED AND EVALUATED THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED. BASED ON MY INQUIRY OF THE PERSON OR PERSONS WHO MANAGE THE SYSTEM, OR THOSE PERSONS DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR GATHERING THE INFORMATION, THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED IS, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, TRUE, ACCURATE, AND COMPLETE. I AM AWARE THAT THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT PENALTIES FOR SUBMITTING FALSE INFORMATION, INCLUDING THE POSSIBILITY OF FINE AND IMPRISONMENT FOR KNOWING VIOLATIONS. SIGNED: _____________________________________ DATE:__________________ CORY SITLER FLORIDA REGISTRATION NUMBER: 89984 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER CONTRACTOR'S CERTIFICATION I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF LAW THAT I UNDERSTAND, SHALL COMPLY WITH, THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA GENERIC PERMIT FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGE FORM LARGE AND SMALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND THIS STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN PREPARED THEREUNDER. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES SHALL BE USED FOR THIS PROJECT TO CONTROL EROSION AND TURBIDITY CAUSED BY STORM WATER RUN-OFF. THE LOCATION AND DETAILS OF EROSION CONTROL METHODS ARE SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PLACING AND MAINTAINING THESE CONTROL METHODS AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS OR AS REQUIRED. HE/SHE SHALL ALSO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED EROSION PROTECTION AS REQUIRED BY LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL LAW. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT STORM WATER COLLECTION SHALL BE MANAGED BY AN EXISTING WET POND SYSTEM, AS WELL AS AN EXISTING EXFILTRATION SYSTEM. THE POND SYSTEM HAS BEEN DESIGNED TO MEET OR EXCEED ALL THE REQUIREMENTS OF ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT AND CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FL. STABILIZATION PRACTICES: TEMPORARY STABILIZATION - TOPSOIL STOCK PILES AND DISTURBED PORTIONS OF THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASE, SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH TEMPORARY SEED AND MULCH WITHIN 7 DAYS OF THE LAST CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT AREA. THE TEMPORARY SEED REQUIRED CAN BE FOUND IN TABLE 1.65 A OF THE FLORIDA DEVELOPMENT MANUAL. PRIOR TO SEEDING, WHERE SOILS ARE ACIDIC 2 TONS OF PULVERIZED AGRICULTURAL LIMESTONE SHOULD BE ADDED PER ACRE AND 450 POUNDS OF 10-20-20 FERTILIZER SHALL BE APPLIED TO EACH ACRE. AFTER SEEDING, EACH AREA SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY MULCHED WITH STRAW OR EQUIVALENT EQUAL. AREAS OF THE SITE WHICH ARE TO BE PAVED SHALL BE TEMPORARILY STABILIZED BY APPLYING GEOTEXTILE AND STONE SUB-BASE UNTIL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CAN BE APPLIED. PERMANENT STABILIZATION - DISTURBED PORTIONS OF THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES PERMANENTLY CEASE SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH PERMANENT SEED NO LATER THAN 7 DAYS AFTER THE LAST CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. THE APPROPRIATE PERMANENT SEED MIX CAN BE FOUND IN TABLES 1.66A, 1.66B AND 1.66C OF THE FLORIDA DEVELOPMENT MANUAL. PRIOR TO SEEDING, 2 TONS/ACRE OF FINELY GROUND AGRICULTURAL LIMESTONE AND THE PROPER FERTILIZER BASED ON THE TYPE OF SEEDING SHALL BE APPLIED TO EACH ACRE TO PROVIDE PLANT NUTRIENTS. AFTER SEEDING, EACH AREA SHALL BE MULCHED IMMEDIATELY. ALL RETENTION/DETENTION BASINS SHALL BE SODDED AT LEAST TO THE NORMAL WATER LINE. ALL EXPOSED AREAS WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY SHALL BE SOLID SODDED, OTHER AREAS WITH SLOPES STEEPER THAN 4:1 SHALL BE SODDED. STRUCTURAL PRACTICES: EARTH DIKE - IF REQUIRED, AN EARTH DIKE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG THE SITE PERIMETER. A PORTION OF THE DIKE SHALL DIVERT RUN-ON AROUND THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. THE REMAINING PORTION OF THE DIKE SHALL COLLECT RUNOFF FROM THE DISTURBED AREA AND DIRECT THE RUNOFF TO THE SEDIMENT BASIN. SEDIMENT BASIN - A SEDIMENT BASIN SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE COMMON DRAINAGE AREA FOR THE SITE. ALL SEDIMENT COLLECTED IN THE BASIN MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE BASIN UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. SEDIMENT FROM THE BASIN MAY BE USED AS FILL ON THE SITE IF IT IS SUITABLE SOIL. WASTE DISPOSAL WASTE MATERIALS - ALL WASTE MATERIALS SHALL BE COLLECTED AND STORED IN A METAL DUMPSTER WITH A SECURE LID IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL LOCAL AND STATE LAWS. ALL TRASH AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS FROM THE SITE SHALL BE DEPOSITED IN THE DUMPSTER. THE SUPERINTENDENT SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE LOCAL UTILITIES TO HAVE THE DUMPSTER EMPTIED AT LEAST TWICE A WEEK AND THE WASTE TAKEN TO AN APPROPRIATE LANDFILL. NO CONSTRUCTION WASTE MATERIALS SHALL BE BURIED ON SITE. THE SUPERINTENDENT SHALL ORGANIZE TRAINING FOR THE EMPLOYEES IN THE PROPER PRACTICES WHEN DEALING WITH WASTE MATERIALS. THE SUPERINTENDENT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR POSTING AND ENFORCING WASTE MATERIAL PROCEDURES. HAZARDOUS WASTE - HAZARDOUS WASTE MATERIALS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL LOCAL AND STATE LAWS OR AS DIRECTED BY THE MANUFACTURER. THE SUPERINTENDENT SHALL ORGANIZE THE PROPER TRAINING FOR EMPLOYEES IN THE PROPER PRACTICES WHEN DEALING WITH HAZARDOUS WASTE MATERIALS. THESE PROCEDURES SHALL BE POSTED ON THE SITE. THE PERSON WHO MANAGES THE SITE SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ENFORCING THE PROCEDURES. SANITARY WASTE - SANITARY WASTE SHALL BE COLLECTED AND DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL LOCAL AND STATE LAWS. THE SUPERINTENDENT SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE LOCAL UTILITY FOR COLLECTION OF THE SANITARY WASTE AT LEAST THREE TIMES A WEEK TO PREVENT SPILLAGE ONTO THE SITE. OFF-SITE TRACKING A STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHALL BE PROVIDED TO REDUCE SEDIMENT TRACKING OFFSITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROMPTLY REMOVE ALL MUD, DIRT, OR OTHER MATERIALS TRACKED OR SPILLED ONTO EXISTING PUBLIC ROADS AND FACILITIES, DUE TO CONSTRUCTION. ALL TRUCKS HAULING MATERIALS OFFSITE SHALL BE COVERED WITH A TARPAULIN. DUST & DEBRIS CONTROL THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DUST CONTROL WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AS WELL AS ALONG HAUL ROUTES AND ROADWAYS USED BY THE EQUIPMENT AND VEHICLES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT EXCESSIVE DUST IS NOT TRANSPORTED BEYOND THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION IN POPULATED AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR MAY CONTROL DUST FOR EMBANKMENTS OR OTHER CLEARED OR UNSURFACED AREAS BY APPLYING WATER. INSTALL MULCH, SEED, SOD, OR TEMPORARY PAVING AS EARLY AS PRACTICAL. CONTROL DUST DURING STORAGE AND HANDLING OF DUSTY MATERIALS BY WETTING, COVERING, OR OTHER MEANS AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. DEBRIS SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED TO ACCUMULATE ON THE PROJECT SITE. SITE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME AND LOCATION WINTER SPRINGS MARKETPLACE TAX PARCEL: 36-20-30-502-0000-0090 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FL *SEE COVER SHEET FOR LOCATION MAP DEVELOPER NAME AND ADDRESS TUSCAWILLA PROPERTY INVESTORS, LLC 630 SOUTH MAITLAND AVE., SUITE 100 MAITLAND, FL 32751 CONTACT: RYAN STAHL PHONE: (407) 628-0277 EMAIL: RSTAHL@EQUINOX-DEVELOPMENT.COM PROJECT DESCRIPTION THIS PROJECT IS TO DEVELOP ADDITIONAL PARKING WITHIN THE WINTER SPRINGS MARKETPLACE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY. THIS SITE IS LOCATED AT SOUTHWEST CORNER OF INTERSECTION OF TUSKAWILLA RD AND SR-434 IN WINTER SPRINGS, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FL. PROJECT AREA: 0.12 ACRES CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA: 1.22 ACRES CONTROL STRUCTURE : CS-A LONGITUDE : 81°15'47.71"W LATITUDE: 28°41'44.80"N CS-B LONGITUDE : 81°15'49.48"W LATITUDE: 28°41'44.89"N CS-C LONGITUDE : 81°15'51.87"W LATITUDE: 28°41'44.90"N ULTIMATE RECEIVING WATERS: LAKE JESSUP via MASTER SYSTEM ACTIVITIES THAT REQUIRE EROSION CONTROL SITE CLEARING AND GRUBBING; PROVIDING A STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE, PERIMETER, AND OTHER EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS; EXCAVATION FOR THE RETENTION POND; SITE GRADING; INSTALLATION OF STORM WATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND WATER STRUCTURES; CURB, ROADWAYS, AND PARKING FACILITIES. *SEE PLANS FOR THE LOCATION OF TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BARRIERS AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL METHODS. SOIL PARAMETERS SOIL TYPES: SEQUENCE OF MAJOR ACTIVITIES THE ORDER OF CONSTRUCTION IS AS FOLLOWS: 1. PROVIDE STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 2. INSTALL SILT FENCES AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL METHODS 3. CLEAR AND GRUB FOR SEDIMENT BASIN AND EARTH DIKE 4. CONSTRUCT EARTH DIKE AND SEDIMENT BASIN 5. FINISH CLEARING AND GRUBBING 6. REMOVE AND STORE TOPSOIL 7. PROVIDE INITIAL GRADING AS REQUIRED 8. STABILIZE ALL DISTURBED AREAS AS SOON AS POSSIBLE 9. INSTALL UTILITIES, STORM SEWER, CURB AND GUTTER 10. INSTALL BASE TO ROAD AND PARKING AREA 11. FINISH GRADING ENTIRE SITE 12. CONSTRUCT FINAL PAVING 13. REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT 14. REMOVE ANY ITEMS THAT ARE NOT REQUIRED TIMING OF CONTROL MEASURES THE INSTALLATION OF SILT FENCE (AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL MEASURES), A STABILIZED ENTRANCE AND SEDIMENT BASIN SHALL OCCUR PRIOR TO CLEARING AND GRUBBING ACTIVITY. AFTER CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE, THE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED AND THE AREAS SHALL BE REGRADED AND PERMANENTLY STABILIZED AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. SIGNATURE AND DATE NAME AND TITLE, COMPANY / ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . BY DA T E AS S H O W N RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E SHEET NUMBER CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T DA T E : LI C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L © 2 0 2 5 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 68 7 6 M A R W I C K L A N E , S U I T E 3 5 0 , O R L A N D O , F L 3 2 8 2 7 PH O N E : ( 4 0 7 ) 5 3 6 - 4 4 4 0 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M R E G I S T R Y N o . 3 5 1 0 6 P R O F E S SIONA L E N G INEER « « « CO R Y N. SITLER No . 8 9 9 8 4 ST A T E O F F LO R I D A L I C E NS E RE V I S E D P E R C I T Y C O M M E N T S 07 / 1 8 / 2 5 MM B 1 Pl o t t e d B y : Bu s b y , M a r y S h e e t S e t : WI N T E R S P R I N G S M A R K E T P L A C E - A D D I T I O N A L P A R K I N G L a y o u t : SW P P P N O T E S Ju l y 1 8 , 2 0 2 5 0 8 : 5 0 : 0 6 a m K: \ O R L _ C i v i l \ 1 4 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 - W i n t e r S p r i n g s W a w a \ C A D D \ C O N S T \ P l a n S h e e t s - A d d P a r k i n g \ C 2 . 0 S W P P P N O T E S . d w g AD L JC B CN S SW P P P N O T E S FL CI T Y O F W I N T E R S P R I N G S C2.1 14 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 07 / 1 8 / 2 0 2 5 WI N T E R S P R I N G S MA R K E T P L A C E - AD D I T I O N A L P A R K I N G 1313 STOP STOP 1 2 3 4 s s s W W W W W W W TW X X SC H O O L SC H O O L SC H O O L SC H O O L TB TB TB TB TB TB STATE ROAD 434 RO B E R T S F A M I L Y L A N E T U S K A W I L L A R O A D TB X LEGEND Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . BY DA T E AS S H O W N RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E SHEET NUMBER CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T DA T E : LI C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L © 2 0 2 5 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 68 7 6 M A R W I C K L A N E , S U I T E 3 5 0 , O R L A N D O , F L 3 2 8 2 7 PH O N E : ( 4 0 7 ) 5 3 6 - 4 4 4 0 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M R E G I S T R Y N o . 3 5 1 0 6 P R O F E S SIONA L E N G INEER « « « CO R Y N. SITLER No . 8 9 9 8 4 ST A T E O F F LO R I D A L I C E NS E RE V I S E D P E R C I T Y C O M M E N T S 07 / 1 8 / 2 5 MM B 1 Pl o t t e d B y : Bu s b y , M a r y S h e e t S e t : WI N T E R S P R I N G S M A R K E T P L A C E - A D D I T I O N A L P A R K I N G L a y o u t : OV E R A L L E X C O N D Ju l y 1 8 , 2 0 2 5 0 8 : 5 0 : 2 3 a m K: \ O R L _ C i v i l \ 1 4 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 - W i n t e r S p r i n g s W a w a \ C A D D \ C O N S T \ P l a n S h e e t s - A d d P a r k i n g \ C 3 . 0 E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S . d w g NO R T H C3.1 C3.2 AD L JC B CN S OV E R A L L E X I S T I N G CO N D I T I O N S A N D DE M O L I T I O N P L A N FL CI T Y O F W I N T E R S P R I N G S C3.0 14 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 07 / 1 8 / 2 0 2 5 WI N T E R S P R I N G S MA R K E T P L A C E - AD D I T I O N A L P A R K I N G 1314 TB X LEGEND BLDG. A 4,280 SF BL D G . B 2, 3 2 5 S F STATE ROAD 434 RO B E R T S F A M I L Y L A N E AA GAS M P D GAS M P D GAS M P D GAS M P D GAS M P D GAS M P D E U45 M 4,736 GSF Type VB Construction CARDBOARDRECYCLINGCONTAINER MPT TRASHCOMPACTOR ICE (Customer) ICE ( As s o c i a t e ) KEY MAP Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . BY DA T E AS S H O W N RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E SHEET NUMBER CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T DA T E : LI C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L © 2 0 2 5 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 68 7 6 M A R W I C K L A N E , S U I T E 3 5 0 , O R L A N D O , F L 3 2 8 2 7 PH O N E : ( 4 0 7 ) 5 3 6 - 4 4 4 0 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M R E G I S T R Y N o . 3 5 1 0 6 P R O F E S SIONA L E N G INEER « « « CO R Y N. SITLER No . 8 9 9 8 4 ST A T E O F F LO R I D A L I C E NS E RE V I S E D P E R C I T Y C O M M E N T S 07 / 1 8 / 2 5 MM B 1 Pl o t t e d B y : Bu s b y , M a r y S h e e t S e t : WI N T E R S P R I N G S M A R K E T P L A C E - A D D I T I O N A L P A R K I N G L a y o u t : C3 . 1 Ju l y 1 8 , 2 0 2 5 0 8 : 5 0 : 3 4 a m K: \ O R L _ C i v i l \ 1 4 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 - W i n t e r S p r i n g s W a w a \ C A D D \ C O N S T \ P l a n S h e e t s - A d d P a r k i n g \ C 3 . 0 E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S . d w g NO R T H AD L JC B CN S EX I S T I N G CO N D I T I O N S A N D DE M O L I T I O N P L A N FL CI T Y O F W I N T E R S P R I N G S C3.1 14 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 07 / 1 8 / 2 0 2 5 WI N T E R S P R I N G S MA R K E T P L A C E - AD D I T I O N A L P A R K I N G 1315 W W s s s s s sss s s W W W W W W TSB L C 28' INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT PLAT OF WINTER SPRINGS MARKETPLACE PLAT BOOK 88, PAGES 5-10 CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT ORB 3041, PAGE 1983 STORM MANHOLE TOP: 46.25' E INV.: 42.14' (24" RCP) SW INV.: 42.16' (24" RCP) 2' WATER LINE STUBOUT CONTROL STRUCTURE TOP: 44.31' N INV.: NO ACCESS (FABRIC UNDER GRATE) DROP INLET TOP: 44.24' NW INV.: 40.59' (16" METAL) STORM MANHOLE TOP: 44.51' SE INV.: 39.77' (18" RCP) SW INV.: 39.64' (18" RCP) SANITARY MANHOLE TOP: 46.76' NW INV.: 40.15' (8" PVC) SANITARY MANHOLE TOP: 46.31' NE INV.: 39.91' (8" PVC) SE INV.: 40.11' (8" PVC) NW INV.: 39.72' (8" PVC) STORM MANHOLE TOP: 46.00' SE INV.: 39.88' (16" METAL) SW INV.: NO ACCESS (FULL OF WATER) STORM MANHOLE TOP: 45.35' NE INV.: 34.53' (48" CPP) SW INV.: 34.33' (UNABLE TO VERIFY MATERIAL, FULL OF WATER) NW INV.: 37.86'(18" CPP) CONTROL STRUCTURE TOP: 44.47' Drop Inlet Top: 44.13' S Inv.: 39.79' (18" RCP) W Inv.: 39.86' (18" RCP) STORM MANHOLE TOP:45.93' SW INV.: 38.73' NE INV.: 34.28' SE INV.: 34.28' M.E.S. SE Inv.: 33.90' Drain Inlet Top: 44.83' NE Inv.: 41.24' (15" Metal) SW Inv.: 41.20' (15" Metal) Drain Inlet Top: 45.37' NE Inv.: 41.95' (15" Metal) SW Inv.: 42.01' (15" Metal) X X X X X TB TB TB TB TB TB TB TB TB TB TB TB TB T U S K A W I L L A R O A D AA GAS M P D GAS M P D GAS M P D GAS M P D GAS M P D GAS M P D E U45 M 4,736 GSF Type VB Construction CARDBOARDRECYCLINGCONTAINER MPT TRASHCOMPACTOR ICE (Customer) ICE ( As s o c i a t e ) KEY MAP TB X LEGEND Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . BY DA T E AS S H O W N RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E SHEET NUMBER CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T DA T E : LI C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L © 2 0 2 5 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 68 7 6 M A R W I C K L A N E , S U I T E 3 5 0 , O R L A N D O , F L 3 2 8 2 7 PH O N E : ( 4 0 7 ) 5 3 6 - 4 4 4 0 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M R E G I S T R Y N o . 3 5 1 0 6 P R O F E S SIONA L E N G INEER « « « CO R Y N. SITLER No . 8 9 9 8 4 ST A T E O F F LO R I D A L I C E NS E RE V I S E D P E R C I T Y C O M M E N T S 07 / 1 8 / 2 5 MM B 1 Pl o t t e d B y : Bu s b y , M a r y S h e e t S e t : WI N T E R S P R I N G S M A R K E T P L A C E - A D D I T I O N A L P A R K I N G L a y o u t : C3 . 2 Ju l y 1 8 , 2 0 2 5 0 8 : 5 0 : 4 4 a m K: \ O R L _ C i v i l \ 1 4 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 - W i n t e r S p r i n g s W a w a \ C A D D \ C O N S T \ P l a n S h e e t s - A d d P a r k i n g \ C 3 . 0 E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S . d w g NO R T H AD L JC B CN S EX I S T I N G CO N D I T I O N S A N D DE M O L I T I O N P L A N FL CI T Y O F W I N T E R S P R I N G S C3.2 14 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 07 / 1 8 / 2 0 2 5 WI N T E R S P R I N G S MA R K E T P L A C E - AD D I T I O N A L P A R K I N G 1 1 1316 11 K E Y M A P R O B E R T S F A M I L Y L A N E T U S K A W I L L A R O A D NA T U R E S W A Y STATE ROAD 434 SO L A R I S W H A R F S T R E E T SC H O O L SC H O O L SC H O O L SC H O O L STOP STOP 1 2 3 4 W W W W W W W S t o p B a r Doub l e Y e l l o w S t r i p e Stop Bar Stop Bar Stop Bar Stop Bar Stop Bar St o p B a r A A GA S M P D GA S M P D GA S M P D GA S M P D GA S M P D GA S M P D E U45 M 4,736 GSF Type VB Construction CARDBOARD RECYCLING CONTAINER MPT TRASH COMPACTOR ICE (Customer) IC E ( A s s o c i a t e ) 10 STATE ROAD 434 RO B E R T S F A M I L Y L A N E T U S K A W I L L A R O A D REQUIRED YARD/LANDSCAPE SETBACKS OVERALL IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS PROVIDED PARKING: PHASING STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN SITE SIGNAGE LANDSCAPING PROVIDED YARD/LANDSCAPE SETBACKS OVERALL SITE DATA: Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . BY DA T E AS S H O W N RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E SHEET NUMBER CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T DA T E : LI C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L © 2 0 2 5 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 68 7 6 M A R W I C K L A N E , S U I T E 3 5 0 , O R L A N D O , F L 3 2 8 2 7 PH O N E : ( 4 0 7 ) 5 3 6 - 4 4 4 0 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M R E G I S T R Y N o . 3 5 1 0 6 P R O F E S SIONA L E N G INEER « « « CO R Y N. SITLER No . 8 9 9 8 4 ST A T E O F F LO R I D A L I C E NS E RE V I S E D P E R C I T Y C O M M E N T S 07 / 1 8 / 2 5 MM B 1 Pl o t t e d B y : Bu s b y , M a r y S h e e t S e t : WI N T E R S P R I N G S M A R K E T P L A C E - A D D I T I O N A L P A R K I N G L a y o u t : OV E R A L L S I T E P L A N Ju l y 1 8 , 2 0 2 5 0 8 : 5 1 : 0 2 a m K: \ O R L _ C i v i l \ 1 4 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 - W i n t e r S p r i n g s W a w a \ C A D D \ C O N S T \ P l a n S h e e t s - A d d P a r k i n g \ C 4 . 0 S I T E P L A N . d w g NO R T H C4.1 C4.2 AD L JC B CN S OV E R A L L S I T E P L A N FL CI T Y O F W I N T E R S P R I N G S C4.0 14 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 07 / 1 8 / 2 0 2 5 WI N T E R S P R I N G S MA R K E T P L A C E - AD D I T I O N A L P A R K I N G 1317 R O B E R T S F A M I L Y L A N E STATE ROAD 434 RO B E R T S F A M I L Y L A N E 11 K E Y M A P AA GAS MPD GAS MPD GAS MPD GAS MPDGAS MPDGAS MPD E U45 M 4,736 GSF Type VB Construction CARDBOARDRECYCLINGCONTAINER MPT TRASHCOMPACTOR ICE(Customer) IC E ( A s s o c i a t e ) KEY MAP Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . BY DA T E AS S H O W N RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E SHEET NUMBER CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T DA T E : LI C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L © 2 0 2 5 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 68 7 6 M A R W I C K L A N E , S U I T E 3 5 0 , O R L A N D O , F L 3 2 8 2 7 PH O N E : ( 4 0 7 ) 5 3 6 - 4 4 4 0 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M R E G I S T R Y N o . 3 5 1 0 6 P R O F E S SIONA L E N G INEER « « « CO R Y N. SITLER No . 8 9 9 8 4 ST A T E O F F LO R I D A L I C E NS E RE V I S E D P E R C I T Y C O M M E N T S 07 / 1 8 / 2 5 MM B 1 Pl o t t e d B y : Bu s b y , M a r y S h e e t S e t : WI N T E R S P R I N G S M A R K E T P L A C E - A D D I T I O N A L P A R K I N G L a y o u t : C4 . 1 Ju l y 1 8 , 2 0 2 5 0 8 : 5 1 : 0 9 a m K: \ O R L _ C i v i l \ 1 4 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 - W i n t e r S p r i n g s W a w a \ C A D D \ C O N S T \ P l a n S h e e t s - A d d P a r k i n g \ C 4 . 0 S I T E P L A N . d w g NO R T H AD L JC B CN S SI T E P L A N FL CI T Y O F W I N T E R S P R I N G S C4.1 14 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 07 / 1 8 / 2 0 2 5 WI N T E R S P R I N G S MA R K E T P L A C E - AD D I T I O N A L P A R K I N G 1318 11 K E Y M A P TUS K A W I L L A R O A D STOP 1 2 3 4 W W W W W W S t o p B a r Dou b l e Y e l l o w S t r i p e Stop Bar Stop Bar Stop Bar Stop Bar St o p B a r L C PROPOSED BUILDING 4,736 SF U45 M 4,736 GSF Type VB Construction CARDBOARD RECYCLING CONTAINER MPT TRASH COMPACTOR ICE (Customer) IC E ( A s s o c i a t e ) 10 T U S K A W I L L A R O A D A A GAS MPD GAS MPD GAS MPD GAS MPDGAS MPDGAS MPD E U45 M 4,736 GSFType VB Construction CARDBOARDRECYCLINGCONTAINER MPT TRASHCOMPACTOR ICE(Customer) ICE ( As s o c i a t e ) KEY MAP REQUIRED YARD/LANDSCAPE SETBACKS OVERALL IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS PROVIDED PARKING: PHASING STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN SITE SIGNAGE LANDSCAPING PROVIDED YARD/LANDSCAPE SETBACKS OVERALL SITE DATA: Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . BY DA T E AS S H O W N RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E SHEET NUMBER CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T DA T E : LI C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L © 2 0 2 5 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 68 7 6 M A R W I C K L A N E , S U I T E 3 5 0 , O R L A N D O , F L 3 2 8 2 7 PH O N E : ( 4 0 7 ) 5 3 6 - 4 4 4 0 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M R E G I S T R Y N o . 3 5 1 0 6 P R O F E S SIONA L E N G INEER « « « CO R Y N. SITLER No . 8 9 9 8 4 ST A T E O F F LO R I D A L I C E NS E RE V I S E D P E R C I T Y C O M M E N T S 07 / 1 8 / 2 5 MM B 1 Pl o t t e d B y : Bu s b y , M a r y S h e e t S e t : WI N T E R S P R I N G S M A R K E T P L A C E - A D D I T I O N A L P A R K I N G L a y o u t : C4 . 2 Ju l y 1 8 , 2 0 2 5 0 8 : 5 1 : 1 9 a m K: \ O R L _ C i v i l \ 1 4 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 - W i n t e r S p r i n g s W a w a \ C A D D \ C O N S T \ P l a n S h e e t s - A d d P a r k i n g \ C 4 . 0 S I T E P L A N . d w g NO R T H AD L JC B CN S SI T E P L A N FL CI T Y O F W I N T E R S P R I N G S C4.2 14 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 07 / 1 8 / 2 0 2 5 WI N T E R S P R I N G S MA R K E T P L A C E - AD D I T I O N A L P A R K I N G 1 1 1319 STOP STOP 1 2 3 4 s s s T SC H O O L SC H O O L SC H O O L SC H O O L A A GA S M P D GA S M P D GA S M P D GA S M P D GA S M P D GA S M P D E U45 M 4,736 GSF Type VB Construction CARDBOARD RECYCLING CONTAINER MPT TRASH COMPACTOR ICE (Customer) IC E ( A s s o c i a t e ) STATE ROAD 434 RO B E R T S F A M I L Y L A N E T U S K A W I L L A R O A D LEGEND Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . BY DA T E AS S H O W N RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E SHEET NUMBER CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T DA T E : LI C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L © 2 0 2 5 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 68 7 6 M A R W I C K L A N E , S U I T E 3 5 0 , O R L A N D O , F L 3 2 8 2 7 PH O N E : ( 4 0 7 ) 5 3 6 - 4 4 4 0 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M R E G I S T R Y N o . 3 5 1 0 6 P R O F E S SIONA L E N G INEER « « « CO R Y N. SITLER No . 8 9 9 8 4 ST A T E O F F LO R I D A L I C E NS E RE V I S E D P E R C I T Y C O M M E N T S 07 / 1 8 / 2 5 MM B 1 Pl o t t e d B y : Bu s b y , M a r y S h e e t S e t : WI N T E R S P R I N G S M A R K E T P L A C E - A D D I T I O N A L P A R K I N G L a y o u t : OV E R A L L P G D Ju l y 1 8 , 2 0 2 5 0 9 : 3 1 : 1 0 a m K: \ O R L _ C i v i l \ 1 4 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 - W i n t e r S p r i n g s W a w a \ C A D D \ C O N S T \ P l a n S h e e t s - A d d P a r k i n g \ C 5 . 0 P A V I N G G R A D I N G & D R A I N A G E . d w g NO R T H C5.1 C5.2 AD L JC B CN S OV E R A L L P A V I N G GR A D I N G & DR A I N A G E FL CI T Y O F W I N T E R S P R I N G S C5.0 14 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 07 / 1 8 / 2 0 2 5 WI N T E R S P R I N G S MA R K E T P L A C E - AD D I T I O N A L P A R K I N G 1320 BLDG. A 4,280 SF BL D G . B 2, 3 2 5 S F STATE ROAD 434 RO B E R T S F A M I L Y L A N E LEGEND AA GAS M P D GAS M P D GAS M P D GAS M P D GAS M P D GAS M P D E U45 M 4,736 GSF Type VB Construction CARDBOARDRECYCLINGCONTAINER MPT TRASHCOMPACTOR ICE(Customer) ICE ( As s o c i a t e ) KEY MAP Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . BY DA T E AS S H O W N RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E SHEET NUMBER CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T DA T E : LI C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L © 2 0 2 5 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 68 7 6 M A R W I C K L A N E , S U I T E 3 5 0 , O R L A N D O , F L 3 2 8 2 7 PH O N E : ( 4 0 7 ) 5 3 6 - 4 4 4 0 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M R E G I S T R Y N o . 3 5 1 0 6 P R O F E S SIONA L E N G INEER « « « CO R Y N. SITLER No . 8 9 9 8 4 ST A T E O F F LO R I D A L I C E NS E RE V I S E D P E R C I T Y C O M M E N T S 07 / 1 8 / 2 5 MM B 1 Pl o t t e d B y : Bu s b y , M a r y S h e e t S e t : WI N T E R S P R I N G S M A R K E T P L A C E - A D D I T I O N A L P A R K I N G L a y o u t : C5 . 1 Ju l y 1 8 , 2 0 2 5 0 9 : 0 9 : 4 1 a m K: \ O R L _ C i v i l \ 1 4 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 - W i n t e r S p r i n g s W a w a \ C A D D \ C O N S T \ P l a n S h e e t s - A d d P a r k i n g \ C 5 . 0 P A V I N G G R A D I N G & D R A I N A G E . d w g NO R T H AD L JC B CN S PA V I N G G R A D I N G & DR A I N A G E P L A N FL CI T Y O F W I N T E R S P R I N G S C5.1 14 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 07 / 1 8 / 2 0 2 5 WI N T E R S P R I N G S MA R K E T P L A C E - AD D I T I O N A L P A R K I N G 1321 LEGEND s s s s s sss s s TSB L C 28' INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT PLAT OF WINTER SPRINGS MARKETPLACE PLAT BOOK 88, PAGES 5-10 CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT ORB 3041, PAGE 1983 STORM MANHOLE TOP: 46.25' E INV.: 42.14' (24" RCP) SW INV.: 42.16' (24" RCP) 2' WATER LINE STUBOUT CONTROL STRUCTURE TOP: 44.31' N INV.: NO ACCESS (FABRIC UNDER GRATE) DROP INLET TOP: 44.24' NW INV.: 40.59' (16" METAL) STORM MANHOLE TOP: 44.51' SE INV.: 39.77' (18" RCP) SW INV.: 39.64' (18" RCP) SANITARY MANHOLE TOP: 46.76' NW INV.: 40.15' (8" PVC) SANITARY MANHOLE TOP: 46.31' NE INV.: 39.91' (8" PVC) SE INV.: 40.11' (8" PVC) NW INV.: 39.72' (8" PVC) STORM MANHOLE TOP: 46.00' SE INV.: 39.88' (16" METAL) SW INV.: NO ACCESS (FULL OF WATER) STORM MANHOLE TOP: 45.35' NE INV.: 34.53' (48" CPP) SW INV.: 34.33' (UNABLE TO VERIFY MATERIAL, FULL OF WATER) NW INV.: 37.86'(18" CPP) CONTROL STRUCTURE TOP: 44.47' Drop Inlet Top: 44.13' S Inv.: 39.79' (18" RCP) W Inv.: 39.86' (18" RCP) STORM MANHOLE TOP:45.93' SW INV.: 38.73' NE INV.: 34.28' SE INV.: 34.28' M.E.S. SE Inv.: 33.90' Drain Inlet Top: 44.83' NE Inv.: 41.24' (15" Metal) SW Inv.: 41.20' (15" Metal) Drain Inlet Top: 45.37' NE Inv.: 41.95' (15" Metal) SW Inv.: 42.01' (15" Metal) PROPOSED BUILDING 4,736 SF U45 M 4,736 GSF Type VB Construction CARDBOARD RECYCLING CONTAINER MPT TRASH COMPACTOR ICE (Customer) IC E ( A s s o c i a t e ) T U S K A W I L L A R O A D AA GAS M P D GAS M P D GAS M P D GAS M P D GAS M P D GAS M P D E U45 M 4,736 GSF Type VB Construction CARDBOARDRECYCLINGCONTAINER MPT TRASHCOMPACTOR ICE(Customer) ICE ( As s o c i a t e ) KEY MAP Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . BY DA T E AS S H O W N RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E SHEET NUMBER CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T DA T E : LI C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L © 2 0 2 5 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 68 7 6 M A R W I C K L A N E , S U I T E 3 5 0 , O R L A N D O , F L 3 2 8 2 7 PH O N E : ( 4 0 7 ) 5 3 6 - 4 4 4 0 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M R E G I S T R Y N o . 3 5 1 0 6 P R O F E S SIONA L E N G INEER « « « CO R Y N. SITLER No . 8 9 9 8 4 ST A T E O F F LO R I D A L I C E NS E RE V I S E D P E R C I T Y C O M M E N T S 07 / 1 8 / 2 5 MM B 1 Pl o t t e d B y : Bu s b y , M a r y S h e e t S e t : WI N T E R S P R I N G S M A R K E T P L A C E - A D D I T I O N A L P A R K I N G L a y o u t : C5 . 2 Ju l y 1 8 , 2 0 2 5 0 9 : 0 9 : 4 8 a m K: \ O R L _ C i v i l \ 1 4 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 - W i n t e r S p r i n g s W a w a \ C A D D \ C O N S T \ P l a n S h e e t s - A d d P a r k i n g \ C 5 . 0 P A V I N G G R A D I N G & D R A I N A G E . d w g NO R T H AD L JC B CN S PA V I N G G R A D I N G & DR A I N A G E P L A N FL CI T Y O F W I N T E R S P R I N G S C5.2 14 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 07 / 1 8 / 2 0 2 5 WI N T E R S P R I N G S MA R K E T P L A C E - AD D I T I O N A L P A R K I N G 1 1322 NTS 6"12" R2"R3"6" 6"7" 8" 18" Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . BY DA T E AS S H O W N RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E SHEET NUMBER CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T DA T E : LI C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L © 2 0 2 5 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 68 7 6 M A R W I C K L A N E , S U I T E 3 5 0 , O R L A N D O , F L 3 2 8 2 7 PH O N E : ( 4 0 7 ) 5 3 6 - 4 4 4 0 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M R E G I S T R Y N o . 3 5 1 0 6 P R O F E S SIONA L E N G INEER « « « CO R Y N. SITLER No . 8 9 9 8 4 ST A T E O F F LO R I D A L I C E NS E RE V I S E D P E R C I T Y C O M M E N T S 07 / 1 8 / 2 5 MM B 1 TYP. BOLLARD DETAIL MODIFIED TYPE F CURB CURB TERMINUS TRANSITION DETAIL CONCRETE SIDEWALK DETAIL CONNECT TO EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT SECTION WHEEL STOP PROFILE (TYP.) WHEEL STOP FRONT VIEWSIDEWALK INTEGRAL CURB DETAIL AD L JC B CN S CO N S T R U C T I O N DE T A I L S FL CI T Y O F W I N T E R S P R I N G S C6.0 14 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 07 / 1 8 / 2 0 2 5 WI N T E R S P R I N G S MA R K E T P L A C E - AD D I T I O N A L P A R K I N G 1323 TPF TP F SC H O O L SC H O O L SC H O O L SC H O O L STOP STOP 1 2 3 4 STATE ROAD 434 RO B E R T S F A M I L Y L A N E T U S K A W I L L A R O A D BFP W W W W W W W W W W W W A A GA S M P D GA S M P D GA S M P D GA S M P D GA S M P D GA S M P D E U45 M 4,736 GSF Type VB Construction CARDBOARD RECYCLING CONTAINER MPT TRASH COMPACTOR ICE (Customer) IC E ( A s s o c i a t e ) GR O U N D C O V E R S TM SO D PA 4,4 7 6 S F BY DA T E AS S H O W N RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E SHEET NUMBER CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T DA T E : LI C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L 68 7 6 M A R W I C K L A N E , S U I T E 3 5 0 , O R L A N D O , F L 3 2 8 2 7 PH O N E : ( 4 0 7 ) 5 3 6 - 4 4 4 0 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M R E G I S T R Y N o . 3 5 1 0 6 RE V I S E D P E R C I T Y C O M M E N T S 07 / 1 7 / 2 5 MM B 1 Pl o t t e d B y : Mi a h , I f r i t S h e e t S e t : WI N T E R S P R I N G S M A R K E T P L A C E - A D D I T I O N A L P A R K I N G L a y o u t : L1 . 0 0 Ju l y 1 7 , 2 0 2 5 0 3 : 2 3 : 0 8 p m K: \ o r l _ c i v i l \ 1 4 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 - w i n t e r s p r i n g s w a w a \ C A D D \ C O N S T \ p l a n s h e e t s - a d d p a r k i n g \ L 1 . 0 0 L A N D S C A P E P L A N . d w g WI N T E R S P R I N G S WA W A OV E R A L L LA N D S C A P E P L A N FL CI T Y O F W I N T E R S P R I N G S L1.00 14 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 07 / 1 7 / 2 0 2 5 AD L JC B CN S NO R T H L1.01 L1.02 1324 SYMBOL CODE QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME CONT CAL SIZE CANOPY TREE AF 3 FLORIDA FLAME RED MAPLE STRAIGHT, SINGLE LEADER, FL#1, FULL ACER RUBRUM 'FLORIDA FLAME'FG 3" CAL MIN 14` HT., 4` SPR. SYMBOL CODE QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME CONT SIZE SPACING SHRUBS VD 20 DWARF WALTER`S VIBURNUM FULL VIBURNUM OBOVATUM `DWARF WALTER`S`7 GAL 36" OC 30" FULL VO 8 SWEET VIBURNUM FULL VIBURNUM ODORATISSIMUM 7 GAL 36" OC 30" FULL GROUND COVERS BF 86 BULBINE FL #1, FULL BULBINE FRUTESCENS 3 GAL 14" FULL 12" OC SOD SA 923 SF FLORATAM ST. AUGUSTINE GRASS ROLLED TIGHT, 100% INSECT, WEED, DIEASE, DEBRIS FREE STENOTAPHRUM SECUNDATUM 'FLORATAM'SOD -- PLANT SCHEDULE TURN ADJUST TPFTP F TPF TP F SC H O O L SC H O O L RO B E R T S F A M I L Y L A N E BY DA T E AS S H O W N RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E SHEET NUMBER CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T DA T E : LI C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L 68 7 6 M A R W I C K L A N E , S U I T E 3 5 0 , O R L A N D O , F L 3 2 8 2 7 PH O N E : ( 4 0 7 ) 5 3 6 - 4 4 4 0 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M R E G I S T R Y N o . 3 5 1 0 6 RE V I S E D P E R C I T Y C O M M E N T S 07 / 1 7 / 2 5 MM B 1 Pl o t t e d B y : Mi a h , I f r i t S h e e t S e t : WI N T E R S P R I N G S M A R K E T P L A C E - A D D I T I O N A L P A R K I N G L a y o u t : L1 . 0 1 Ju l y 1 7 , 2 0 2 5 0 3 : 2 3 : 3 8 p m K: \ o r l _ c i v i l \ 1 4 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 - w i n t e r s p r i n g s w a w a \ C A D D \ C O N S T \ p l a n s h e e t s - a d d p a r k i n g \ L 1 . 0 0 L A N D S C A P E P L A N . d w g WI N T E R S P R I N G S WA W A LA N D S C A P E P L A N FL CI T Y O F W I N T E R S P R I N G S L1.01 14 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 07 / 1 7 / 2 0 2 5 AD L JC B CN S NO R T H LANDSCAPE NOTES: 1.ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIAL TO BE FLORIDA GRADE #1 OR BETTER QUALITY 2.ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE A MINIMUM OF 4" OF TOPSOIL. 3.ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE HEALTHY, VIGOROUS, AND FREE OF PESTS AND DISEASE. 4.ALL MATERIALS ARE SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BEFORE, DURING, AND AFTER INSTALLATION. 5.ALL TREES MUST BE GUYED OR STAKED AS SHOWN IN THE DETAILS. 6.ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE COMPLETELY MULCHED AS SPECIFIED. 7.PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND SHALL AVOID DAMAGE TO ALL UTILITIES DURING THE COURSE OF THE WORK. LOCATIONS OF EXISTING BURIED UTILITY LINES SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE BASED UPON BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION AND ARE TO BE CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR 1) TO VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES ADJACENT TO THE WORK AREA 2) TO PROTECT ALL UTILITY LINES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD 3) TO REPAIR ANY AND ALL DAMAGE TO UTILITIES, STRUCTURES, SITE APPURTENANCES, ETC. WHICH OCCURS AS A RESULT OF THE CONSTRUCTION. 8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING ALL QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS BEFORE PRICING THE WORK. 9.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERY SCHEDULE AND PROTECTION BETWEEN DELIVERY AND PLANTING TO MAINTAIN HEALTHY PLANT CONDITIONS. 10.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FULLY MAINTAINING (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: WATERING, SPRAYING, MULCHING, FERTILIZING, ETC.) ALL OF THE PLANT MATERIALS AND LAWN FOR THE WARRANTY PERIOD. 11.ANY PLANT MATERIAL WHICH IS DISEASED, DISTRESSED, DEAD, OR REJECTED (PRIOR TO SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION) SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND REPLACED WITH MATERIAL OF THE SAME SPECIES, QUANTITY, AND SIZE AND MEETING ALL PLANT LIST SPECIFICATIONS. 12.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETELY GUARANTEE ALL PLANT MATERIAL FOR WARRANTY PERIOD. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROMPTLY MAKE ALL REPLACEMENTS DURING THE NORMAL PLANTING SEASON. 13.STANDARDS SET FORTH IN "AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK" REPRESENT GUIDELINE SPECIFICATIONS ONLY AND SHALL CONSTITUTE MINIMUM QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR PLANT MATERIAL. 14.ALL LANDSCAPING SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO SOUND NURSERY PRACTICES, AND SHALL BE FLORIDA NO. 1 OR BETTER AS GIVEN IN "GRADES AND STANDARDS FOR NURSERY PLANTS, PARTS I AND II," STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 15.ALL INVASIVE / EXOTIC SPECIES AND PROHIBITED TREE SPECIES SHALL BE REMOVED FROM SITE, INCLUDING ROOT BALLS TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE WITH NO DAMAGE TO ADJACENT EXISTING TREES. 16.ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS WILL BE PROVIDED WITH PERMANENT AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. 17.TREE SUPPORT MATERIALS ARE TO BE REMOVED FROM EACH TREE ONCE IT IS "ESTABLISHED" (AS APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT). 18.ALL PLANT SPECIFICATIONS IN THE PLANT SCHEDULE SHALL BE CONSIDERED THE MINIMUM ALLOWABLE SPECIFICATIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROCURE PLANT MATERIALS AND UPSIZE AS NECESSARY TO MEET THE MOST STRINGENT SPECIFICATION. 19.ALL PLANTED LANDSCAPE AREAS TO HAVE 3" DEEP DESIGNER BROWN HARDWOOD MULCH TO FULLY COVER DRIP IRRIGATION & AMENDED SOILS. REPAIR AS NEEDED DURING CONSTRUCTION. SUBMIT ALTERNATIVE MULCH SPECIFICATION FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT APPROVAL. MISC. QTY BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME SPECIFICATIONS MULCH TBD DESIGNER BROWN HARDWOOD MULCH 3" DEPTH MINIMUM, SHREDDED, FREE OF WEEDS/INVASIVE PLANT MATERIAL 1325 SYMBOL CODE QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME CONT SIZE SPACING SOD PA 178 SF ARGENTINE BAHIAGRASS ROLLED TIGHT, 100% INSECT, WEED, DIEASE, DEBRIS FREE PASPALUM NOTATUM 'ARGENTINE'SOD -- PLANT SCHEDULE ADDITIONAL PARKING STOP 1 2 3 4 T U S K A W I L L A R O A D W W W W W W W W W L C PROPOSED BUILDING 4,736 SF 4,736 GSF Type VB Construction CARDBOARD RECYCLING CONTAINER BY DA T E AS S H O W N RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E SHEET NUMBER CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T DA T E : LI C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L 68 7 6 M A R W I C K L A N E , S U I T E 3 5 0 , O R L A N D O , F L 3 2 8 2 7 PH O N E : ( 4 0 7 ) 5 3 6 - 4 4 4 0 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M R E G I S T R Y N o . 3 5 1 0 6 RE V I S E D P E R C I T Y C O M M E N T S 07 / 1 7 / 2 5 MM B 1 Pl o t t e d B y : Mi a h , I f r i t S h e e t S e t : WI N T E R S P R I N G S M A R K E T P L A C E - A D D I T I O N A L P A R K I N G L a y o u t : L1 . 0 2 Ju l y 1 7 , 2 0 2 5 0 3 : 2 3 : 2 1 p m K: \ o r l _ c i v i l \ 1 4 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 - w i n t e r s p r i n g s w a w a \ C A D D \ C O N S T \ p l a n s h e e t s - a d d p a r k i n g \ L 1 . 0 0 L A N D S C A P E P L A N . d w g WI N T E R S P R I N G S WA W A LA N D S C A P E P L A N FL CI T Y O F W I N T E R S P R I N G S L1.02 14 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 07 / 1 7 / 2 0 2 5 AD L JC B CN S NO R T H LANDSCAPE NOTES: 1.ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIAL TO BE FLORIDA GRADE #1 OR BETTER QUALITY 2.ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE A MINIMUM OF 4" OF TOPSOIL. 3.ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE HEALTHY, VIGOROUS, AND FREE OF PESTS AND DISEASE. 4.ALL MATERIALS ARE SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BEFORE, DURING, AND AFTER INSTALLATION. 5.ALL TREES MUST BE GUYED OR STAKED AS SHOWN IN THE DETAILS. 6.ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE COMPLETELY MULCHED AS SPECIFIED. 7.PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND SHALL AVOID DAMAGE TO ALL UTILITIES DURING THE COURSE OF THE WORK. LOCATIONS OF EXISTING BURIED UTILITY LINES SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE BASED UPON BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION AND ARE TO BE CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR 1) TO VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES ADJACENT TO THE WORK AREA 2) TO PROTECT ALL UTILITY LINES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD 3) TO REPAIR ANY AND ALL DAMAGE TO UTILITIES, STRUCTURES, SITE APPURTENANCES, ETC. WHICH OCCURS AS A RESULT OF THE CONSTRUCTION. 8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING ALL QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS BEFORE PRICING THE WORK. 9.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERY SCHEDULE AND PROTECTION BETWEEN DELIVERY AND PLANTING TO MAINTAIN HEALTHY PLANT CONDITIONS. 10.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FULLY MAINTAINING (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: WATERING, SPRAYING, MULCHING, FERTILIZING, ETC.) ALL OF THE PLANT MATERIALS AND LAWN FOR THE WARRANTY PERIOD. 11.ANY PLANT MATERIAL WHICH IS DISEASED, DISTRESSED, DEAD, OR REJECTED (PRIOR TO SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION) SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND REPLACED WITH MATERIAL OF THE SAME SPECIES, QUANTITY, AND SIZE AND MEETING ALL PLANT LIST SPECIFICATIONS. 12.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETELY GUARANTEE ALL PLANT MATERIAL FOR WARRANTY PERIOD. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROMPTLY MAKE ALL REPLACEMENTS DURING THE NORMAL PLANTING SEASON. 13.STANDARDS SET FORTH IN "AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK" REPRESENT GUIDELINE SPECIFICATIONS ONLY AND SHALL CONSTITUTE MINIMUM QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR PLANT MATERIAL. 14.ALL LANDSCAPING SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO SOUND NURSERY PRACTICES, AND SHALL BE FLORIDA NO. 1 OR BETTER AS GIVEN IN "GRADES AND STANDARDS FOR NURSERY PLANTS, PARTS I AND II," STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 15.ALL INVASIVE / EXOTIC SPECIES AND PROHIBITED TREE SPECIES SHALL BE REMOVED FROM SITE, INCLUDING ROOT BALLS TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE WITH NO DAMAGE TO ADJACENT EXISTING TREES. 16.ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS WILL BE PROVIDED WITH PERMANENT AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. 17.TREE SUPPORT MATERIALS ARE TO BE REMOVED FROM EACH TREE ONCE IT IS "ESTABLISHED" (AS APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT). 18.ALL PLANT SPECIFICATIONS IN THE PLANT SCHEDULE SHALL BE CONSIDERED THE MINIMUM ALLOWABLE SPECIFICATIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROCURE PLANT MATERIALS AND UPSIZE AS NECESSARY TO MEET THE MOST STRINGENT SPECIFICATION. 19.ALL PLANTED LANDSCAPE AREAS TO HAVE 3" DEEP DESIGNER BROWN HARDWOOD MULCH TO FULLY COVER DRIP IRRIGATION & AMENDED SOILS. REPAIR AS NEEDED DURING CONSTRUCTION. SUBMIT ALTERNATIVE MULCH SPECIFICATION FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT APPROVAL. MISC. QTY BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME SPECIFICATIONS MULCH TBD DESIGNER BROWN HARDWOOD MULCH 3" DEPTH MINIMUM, SHREDDED, FREE OF WEEDS/INVASIVE PLANT MATERIAL ANY DISTURBED AREA DUE TO CONSTRUCTION TO BE SODDED ANY AREA DISTURBED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION TO BE SODDED EXISTING LANDSCAPE NOT TO BE DISTURBED (TYP.) EXISTING LANDSCAPE NOT TO BE DISTURBED (TYP.) NORMAL WATER LINE NORMAL WATER LINE EXISTING LANDSCAPE NOT TO BE DISTURBED (TYP.) IRRIGATE TO ESTABLISHMENT IRRIGATE TO ESTABLISHMENT 1326 BY DA T E AS S H O W N RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E SHEET NUMBER CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T DA T E : LI C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L 68 7 6 M A R W I C K L A N E , S U I T E 3 5 0 , O R L A N D O , F L 3 2 8 2 7 PH O N E : ( 4 0 7 ) 5 3 6 - 4 4 4 0 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M R E G I S T R Y N o . 3 5 1 0 6 RE V I S E D P E R C I T Y C O M M E N T S 07 / 1 7 / 2 5 MM B 1 Pl o t t e d B y : Mi a h , I f r i t S h e e t S e t : WI N T E R S P R I N G S M A R K E T P L A C E - A D D I T I O N A L P A R K I N G L a y o u t : L1 . 5 0 Ju l y 1 7 , 2 0 2 5 0 3 : 2 3 : 4 8 p m K: \ o r l _ c i v i l \ 1 4 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 - w i n t e r s p r i n g s w a w a \ C A D D \ C O N S T \ p l a n s h e e t s - a d d p a r k i n g \ L 1 . 0 0 L A N D S C A P E P L A N . d w g WI N T E R S P R I N G S WA W A LA N D S C A P E D E T A I L S FL CI T Y O F W I N T E R S P R I N G S L1.50 14 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 07 / 1 7 / 2 0 2 5 AD L JC B CN S 4 3 6 7 8 9 10 11 5 3X ROOTBALL WIDTH MIN. 6" 12" TYP. TRUNK/ROOT BALL TO BE CENTERED AND PLUMB/LEVEL IN PLANTING PIT. 1 6" DIA. CLEAR OF MULCH AT TRUNK FLARE.2 3" MINIMUM MULCH AS SPECIFIED. WHERE TREES ARE PLACED IN SOD, MULCH RING FOR TREES SHALL BE 6' DIAMETER (MIN.) OR AS DIRECTED BY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 3 4" HIGH BERM, FIRMLY COMPACTED.4 TREE FROG ANCHOR SYSTEM INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 5 FINISHED GRADE. (SEE GRADING PLAN)6 TOP OF ROOTBALL MIN. 1" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 7 PREPARED PLANTING SOIL AS SPECIFIED.8 TOP OF ROOTBALL SHALL BE 1" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. ROOTBALLS GREATER THAN 24" DIAMETER SHALL BE PLACED ON MOUND OF UNDISTURBED SOIL TO PREVENT SETTLING. ROOTBALLS SMALLER THAN 24" IN DIAMETER MAY SIT ON COMPACTED EARTH. 9 UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL.10 SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF PLANTING PIT. 11 TREE PLANTING SECTION / PLAN PLAN SECTION MULCH/TOPSOIL BACKFILL ROOTBALL AND TRUNK TREE STABILIZATION AND FERTILIZATION SYSTEM NOTES: A.FINAL TREE STAKING DETAILS AND PLACEMENT TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER. B.REMOVE BURLAP, WIRE AND STRAPS (ANYTHING THAT COULD GIRDLE TREE OR RESTRICT ROOT GROWTH) ON UPPER 1/3 OF ROOTBALL. C.PRUNE ALL TREES IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI A-300. 1 2 NTS 1 L1.50 TREE PLANTING ON A SLOPE SECTION / PLAN NTS PLAN SECTION MULCH/TOPSOIL BACKFILL ROOTBALL AND TRUNK TREE STABILIZATION AND FERTILIZATION SYSTEM NOTES: A.FINAL TREE STAKING DETAILS AND PLACEMENT TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER. B.REMOVE BURLAP, WIRE AND STRAPS (ANYTHING THAT COULD GIRDLE TREE OR RESTRICT ROOT GROWTH) ON UPPER 1/3 OF ROOTBALL. C.PRUNE ALL TREES IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI A-300. 2 4 6 12 1 7 3 8 9 10 5 11 3X ROOTBALL WIDTH MIN. 6" 12" TYP. TRUNK/ROOT BALL TO BE CENTERED AND PLUMB/LEVEL IN PLANTING PIT. 1 6" DIA. CLEAR OF MULCH AT TRUNK FLARE.2 3. 4" HIGH BERM, FIRMLY COMPACTED.3 3" MINIMUM OF HARDWOOD BARK MULCH AS SPECIFIED. WHERE TREES ARE PLACED IN SOD, MULCH RING FOR TREES SHALL BE 6' DIAMETER (MIN.) OR AS DIRECTED BY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 4 TREE FROG ANCHOR SYSTEM INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 5 4" MIN. OF TOPSOIL TO BRING TO FINISHED GRADE. (SEE GRADING PLAN) 6 TOP OF ROOTBALL MIN. 1" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 7 PREPARED PLANTING SOIL AS SPECIFIED.8 ROOTBALLS GREATER THAN 24" DIAMETER SHALL BE PLACED ON MOUND OF UNDISTURBED SOIL TO PREVENT SETTLING. ROOTBALLS SMALLER THAN 24" IN DIAMETER MAY SIT ON COMPACTED EARTH. 9 UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL.10 SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF PLANTING PIT. 11 CUT BACK SLOPE TO PROVIDE A FLAT SURFACE FOR PLANTING. 12 L1.50 2 MAINTAIN 12" DEAD ZONE AT BED EDGE. REFER TO PLANT SCHEDULE FOR SPACING. BEST FACE OF SHRUB/ GROUNDCOVER TO FACE FRONT OF PLANTING BED. X X NOTES: A.CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE PERCOLATION OF ALL PLANTING PITS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. B.WHEN SHRUBS ARE PRUNED IN MASSES, PRUNE ALL SHRUBS TO ACHIEVE UNIFORM MASS / HEIGHT. C.ALL SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVERS SHALL BE PLUMB VERTICALLY, UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE. 4" TY P . 4" TYP. 3X ROOT BALL WIDTH MINIMUM 1 3 4 10 'X' 5 8 8 6 7 6 7 9 2 SHRUB/GROUNDCOVER PLANTING SECTION / PLAN NTS PLAN SECTION TOP OF SHRUB ROOTBALLS TO BE PLANTED 1" - 2" HIGH WITH SOIL MOUNDING UP TO THE TOP OF ROOTBALL. 1 PRUNE ALL SHRUBS TO ACHIEVE A UNIFORM MASS/HEIGHT. 2 3" MULCH LAYER AS SPECIFIED. 3 EXCAVATE ENTIRE BED SPECIFIED FOR GROUNDCOVER BED. 4 FINISHED GRADE (SEE GRADING PLAN). 5 PREPARED PLANTING SOIL AS SPECIFIED. (SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES) NOTE: WHEN GROUND- COVERS AND SHRUBS USED IN MASSES, ENTIRE BED TO BE AMENDED WITH PLANTING SOIL MIX AS SPECIFIED. 6 SCARIFY OF PLANTING PIT SIDES AND BOTTOM. 7 4" HIGH BERM FIRMLY COMPACTED. 8 UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL.9 FERTILIZER TABLETS (MAX 3" DEEP) 10 L1.50 3 NOTES: A.EXCAVATE A CONTINUOUS 24" DEEP PIT (FROM TOP OF CURB) FOR ENTIRE LENGTH AND WIDTH OF ISLAND & BACKFILL WITH APPROVED PLANTING MIX. B.PROTECT AND RETAIN ALL CURBS AND BASE. COMPACTED SUBGRADE TO REMAIN FOR STRUCTURAL SUPPORT OF CURB SYSTEM (TYP). C.ALL ISLANDS SHALL UTILIZE POOR DRAINAGE DETAIL WHEN PERCOLATION RATES ARE 2" PER HOUR OR LESS. WIDTH VARIES - SEE PLANS SEE NOTE 1 2 3 PLANTED PARKING LOT ISLANDS/MEDIANS SECTION NTS CROWN ISLANDS @ 5:1 SLOPES (OR AS SPECIFIED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS).1 CLEAR ZONE: 36" MIN. FROM BACK OF CURB TO CENTER OF NEAREST SHRUB. CLEAR ZONE SHALL CONTAIN 3" CONTINUOUS MULCH OR TURF, SEE PLANS. 2 2" MIN VERTICAL CLEARANCE, TOP OF CURB TO TOP OF MULCH.3 L1.50 4 EXISTING GRADE (DASHED) NOTES: A.CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE PERCOLATION OF ALL PLANTING PITS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. B.WHEN SHRUBS ARE PRUNED IN MASSES, PRUNE ALL SHRUBS TO ACHIEVE UNIFORM MASS / HEIGHT. C.ALL SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVERS SHALL BE PLUMB VERTICALLY, UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE. 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 4" T Y P . 4" TYP. 3X ROOT BALL WIDTH MINIMUM SHRUB/GROUNDCOVER PLANTING ON A SLOPE SECTION NTS TOP OF SHRUB ROOTBALLS TO BE PLANTED 1" - 2" HIGH WITH SOIL MOUNDING UP TO THE TOP OF ROOTBALL. 1 PRUNE SHRUBS AS DIRECTED BY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 2 3" MINIMUM OF MULCH AS SPECIFIED. WHERE SHRUBS ARE PLACED IN MASSES, MULCH SHALL BE SPREAD IN A CONTINUOUS BED. 3 SOIL BERM TO HOLD WATER. TOP OF PLANTING PIT 'BERM' TO BE LEVEL ACROSS PIT. SLOPE DOWNHILL PORTION OF BERM AS REQUIRED TO MEET EXISTING GRADE. MULCH OVER EXPOSED TOPSOIL. 4 FINISHED GRADE (SEE GRADING PLAN) 5 PREPARED PLANTING SOIL AS SPECIFIED. (SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES). 6 SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF PLANTING PIT. 7 FERTILIZER TABLETS (MAX 3" DEEP). 8 UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL9 L1.50 5 NOTES: 1.CLEAR ZONE: 36" MIN. FROM BUILDING TO CENTER OF NEAREST SHRUB. 2.INSTALL SPECIFIED MULCH: 24" MIN. FROM BUILDING. SPECIFIED MULCH TO BE INSTALLED AT A DEPTH OF 3" (MIN.) PLANTINGS ADJACENT TO BUILDINGS SECTION NTS 24" MIN. CLEAR MIN. 1/2 MATURE SHRUB WIDTH BUILDING SPECIFIED MULCH L1.50 6 2'-0" MIN. CLR. MIN. 1/2 MATURE SHRUB WIDTH 1 2 PARKING SPACE/CURB PLANTING SECTION NTS INSTALL CONTINUOUS MULCH BED ADJACENT TO PARKING SPACES AS SHOWN. MULCH SHALL BE MIN. 3" DEEP. NO POP-UP IRRIGATION HEADS SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN 24" OF A PARKING SPACE ON ANY SIDE. 1 CURB / PARKING LOT EDGE.2 L1.50 7 4' - 0 " 7' - 6 " 7'-6"7'-6" 7'-6" MIN. 1 2 MATURE SHRUB WIDTH MIN. 15' CLEAR MIN. 1 2 MATURE SHRUB WIDTH FIRE HYDRANT 1 2 3 SHRUB PLANTING AT FIRE HYDRANT SECTION / PLAN NTS PLAN SECTION FIRE HYDRANT.1 NO PLANT EXCEEDING 12" MATURE HEIGHT MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN SHOWN RADIUS OF ALL PROPOSED OR EXISTING FIRE HYDRANTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST PLANT MATERIAL SO THAT NO CONFLICTS WITH FIRE HYDRANTS OCCUR ON SITE. 2 FRONT OF HYDRANT (TOWARD CURB) 3 L1.50 8 +H.P. LIMITS OF PLANTING PIT NOTES: A.THIS DETAIL SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED WHERE PERCOLATION RATES ARE 2" PER HOUR OR LESS. B.CONTRACTOR TO PERFORM PERCOLATION TEST AS REQUIRED. AND NOTIFY OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. C.SEE TYPICAL TREE PLANTING DETAIL THIS SHEET FOR PLANT STAKING. 3X ROOTBALL DIAMETER VA R I E S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 5 6 9 POOR DRAINAGE CONDITION SECTION / PLAN NTS PLAN SECTION FINISH GRADE (SEE GRADING PLANS).1 BACKFILL WITH PREPARED PLANTING SOIL MIX AS SPECIFIED. 2 FILTER CLOTH, MIRAFI 500X OR BETTER.3 SLOPE BOTTOM TO DRAIN.4 AUGURED HOLE Ø ±18" PENETRATE THROUGH OCCLUDING LAYER TO WATER TABLE OR TO A DEPTH OF 7' TO ASSURE PROPER PERCOLATION. 5 BACKFILL WITH 1/2" - 3/4" GRAVEL TO REQUIRED DEPTH THROUGH OCCLUDING LAYER TO ASSURE PROPER PERCOLATION. 6 WATER TABLE. (DEPTH VARIES)7 UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL.8 SET ROOTBALL ON UNDISTURBED STABLE SUBSOIL SO THAT TOP OF ROOT BALL IS 1" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 9 ROOTBALL TRUNK L1.50 9 INSTALLATION NOTES: NOTE: IF WIRE TIES ARE USED, AVOID DIRECT CONTACT WITH FENCE. WIRE MAY DAMAGE FENCE OVER TIME. A.POST SELECTION SHOULD BE BASED ON EXPECTED STRENGTH NEEDS AND THE LENGTH OF TIME FENCE WILL BE IN PLACE. FLEXIBLE FIBERGLASS ROD POSTS ARE RECOMMENDED FOR PARKS, ATHLETIC EVENTS AND CROWD CONTROL INSTALLATIONS. METAL "T" POSTS OR TREATED WOOD POSTS ARE TYPICALLY USED FOR CONSTRUCTION AND OTHER APPLICATIONS. B.POSTS SHOULD BE DRIVEN INTO THE GROUND TO A DEPTH OF 1/3 OF THE HEIGHT OF THE POST. FOR EXAMPLE, A 6' POST SHOULD BE SET AT LEAST 2' INTO THE GROUND. C.SPACE POSTS EVERY 6' (MIN.) TO 8' (MAX.). D.SECURE FENCING TO POST WITH NYLON CABLE TIES (AVAILABLE FROM CONWED PLASTICS). WOOD STRIPS MAY BE ALSO BE USED TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SUPPORT AND PROTECTION BETWEEN TIES AND POSTS. 6'-8"oc 6' MI N . 1 2 CORNER CONNECTION CONNECTION TREE PROTECTION FENCING ELEVATION / PLAN NTS 6'H "PERIMETER PLUS" CONSTRUCTION FENCE BY CONWED PLASTICS OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE APPROVED EQUAL. SUBMIT PRODUCT INFORMATION FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 1 8' TALL METAL "T" POSTS OR 2" x 2" X 8' PRESSURE TREATED WOOD POSTS WITH 24" BURIAL BELOW GRADE. 2 ELEVATION PLAN DRIPLINE (TYP.) DRIPLINE (TYP.) L1.50 10 PALM PLANTING SECTION / PLAN NTS OA =OVERALL PALM HEIGHT (MEASURED TO TOP OF BUD) CT =CLEAR TRUNK (MEASURED TO BOTTOM OF LEAF SHEATHS) GW =GRAY WOOD (MEASURED TO TOP OF HARDENED TRUNK) NOTES: A.FINAL TREE STAKING DETAILS AND PLACEMENT TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER. B.ALL TREE STAKING IS TO BE WITHIN MULCH BED AREA OUTSIDE TREE PIT. C.CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE PERCOLATION OF ALL PLANTING PITS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION - REFER TO POOR DRAINAGE CONDITION DETAIL. OA CT / G W 12" 6" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 PLAN SECTION 4 8 9 5 LAYERS OF BURLAP TO PROTECT TRUNK. 1 FIVE 2" X 4" X 18" WOOD BATTENS.2 SECURE BATTENS WITH 2- 3/4" CARBON STEEL BANDS TO HOLD BATTENS IN PLACE. NO NAILS SHALL BE DRIVEN INTO PALM. HEIGHT OF BATTENS SHALL BE LOCATED IN RELATION TO THE HEIGHT OF THE PALM FOR ADEQUATE BRACING. 3 (3) 2"X4"X8' SUPPORTS. NAIL (DRILL AN NAIL IF NECESSARY) TO BATTENS AND 2" 4" STAKES. STAIN DARK BROWN. 4 3" SPECIFIED MULCH5 BERM SOIL TO HOLD WATER.6 FINISH GRADE7 2X4X24" (MIN) P.T. WOOD STAKES (TYP.) NAIL TO SUPPORT POLES. 8 PREPARED PLANTING SOIL AS SPECIFIED. (SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES). 9 11 L1.50 1.BASE OF TREE SHALL BE PLANTED SLIGHTLY ABOVE (1" MIN.) ADJACENT FINISH GRADE. REMOVE ALL TWINE & STRAPS & CUT BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOT BALL. NO SYNTHETIC BURLAP WILL BE ACCEPTED. 2.4" SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH OR APPROVED EQUAL. 3.DIAMETER OF TREE PIT TO BE TWICE THE DIAMETER OF ROOT BALL-ROUGHEN SIDES OF TREE PIT. 4.3" HIGH SOIL BERM TO HOLD WATER. 5.TOPSOIL MIX BACKFILL. 6.TREE WRAP. 7.4" MIN. OF TOPSOIL TO BRING TO FINISHED GRADE (SEE GRADING PLAN). 8.ROOT BALLS GREATER THAN 24" DIAMETER SHALL BE PLACED ON MOUND OF UNDISTURBED SOIL TO PREVENT SETTLING ROOT BALLS SMALLER THAN 24" IN DIA. MAY SIT ON COMPACTED EARTH. 9.UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL. 10.PREPARE PLANTING SOIL AS SPECIFIED. 11.Tree Frog® RBK40pt FOR UP TO 4" TREE CALIPER OR Tree Frog® RBK60pt FOR GREATER THAN 4" AND UP TO 6" TREE CALIPER. REFER TO SITEWORK SPECIFICATIONS FOR APPROVED MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS. PLAN SECTION NOTES: A.FINAL TREE STAKING DETAILS AND PLACEMENT TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER. B.SET TREE AT ORIGINAL DEPTH. REMOVE BURLAP, WIRE AND STRAPS (ANYTHING THAT COULD GIRDLE TREE OR RESTRICT ROOT GROWTH) ON UPPER 1/3 OF ROOTBALL. C.SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES FOR THE TYPE OF MULCH MATERIAL TO USE. D.PRUNE TREE AS DIRECTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT E.ASSURE PERCOLATION OF ALL PLANTING PITS OV E R A L L H E I G H T ( O . H . ) CL E A R T R U N K ( C . T . ) HE I G H T 12" TYP. 1 2 3 4 5 8 9 10 117 6 TREE STAKING MULCH/ TOPSOIL BACKFILL ROOTBALL AND TRUNK MULTI-TRUNK TREE PLANTING SECTION/PLAN NTS 12 L1.50 1327 BY DA T E AS S H O W N RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E SHEET NUMBER CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T DA T E : LI C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L 68 7 6 M A R W I C K L A N E , S U I T E 3 5 0 , O R L A N D O , F L 3 2 8 2 7 PH O N E : ( 4 0 7 ) 5 3 6 - 4 4 4 0 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M R E G I S T R Y N o . 3 5 1 0 6 RE V I S E D P E R C I T Y C O M M E N T S 07 / 1 7 / 2 5 MM B 1 Pl o t t e d B y : Mi a h , I f r i t S h e e t S e t : WI N T E R S P R I N G S M A R K E T P L A C E - A D D I T I O N A L P A R K I N G L a y o u t : L1 . 5 1 Ju l y 1 7 , 2 0 2 5 0 3 : 2 3 : 4 3 p m K: \ o r l _ c i v i l \ 1 4 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 - w i n t e r s p r i n g s w a w a \ C A D D \ C O N S T \ p l a n s h e e t s - a d d p a r k i n g \ L 1 . 0 0 L A N D S C A P E P L A N . d w g WI N T E R S P R I N G S WA W A LA N D S C A P E SP E C I F I C A T I O N S FL CI T Y O F W I N T E R S P R I N G S L1.51 14 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 07 / 1 7 / 2 0 2 5 AD L JC B CN S TYPICAL LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS (FLORIDA) A.SCOPE OF WORK 1.THE WORK CONSISTS OF: FURNISHING ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, TOOLS, TRANSPORTATION, AND ANY OTHER APPURTENANCES NECESSARY FOR THE COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS, AS INCLUDED IN THE PLANT LIST, AND AS SPECIFIED HEREIN. 2.WORK SHALL INCLUDE MAINTENANCE AND WATERING OF ALL CONTRACT PLANTING AREAS UNTIL CERTIFICATION OF ACCEPTANCE BY THE OWNER. B.PROTECTION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES 1.ALL EXISTING BUILDINGS, WALKS, WALLS, PAVING, PIPING, OTHER SITE CONSTRUCTION ITEMS, AND PLANTING ALREADY COMPLETED OR ESTABLISHED AND DESIGNATED TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE BY THE CONTRACTOR UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. ALL DAMAGE RESULTING FROM NEGLIGENCE SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER, AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING ALL NECESSARY BMP DEVICES ACCORDING TO ALL REGULATORY AGENCY'S STANDARDS THROUGH THE DURATION OF ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A DETAILED PROJECT SPECIFIC WORK ZONE TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN UNLESS THE WORK REQUIRES NOTHING MORE THAN A DIRECT APPLICATION OF FDOT DESIGN STANDARDS, INDEX 600. IF A DIRECT APPLICATION OF INDEX 600 IS PROPOSED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT IN WRITING A STATEMENT INDICATING THE STANDARD INDEX AND PAGE NUMBER NO LESS THAN 10 BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. WHEN A DIRECT APPLICATION OF FDOT STANDARD INDEX 600 IS NOT ACCEPTABLE A PROJECT SPECIFIC WORK ZONE TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN SHALL BE PREPARED BY A FLORIDA PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER WHO HAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED ADVANCED TRAINING IN MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC, AS DEFINED BY FDOT FOR APPROVAL BY THE COUNTY ENGINEER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL UTILITIES, WHETHER PUBLIC OR PRIVATE, PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. THE INFORMATION AND DATA SHOWN WITH RESPECT TO EXISTING UNDERGROUND FACILITIES AT OR CONTIGUOUS TO THE SITE IS APPROXIMATE AND BASED ON INFORMATION FURNISHED BY THE OWNER OF SUCH UNDERGROUND FACILITIES OR ON PHYSICAL APPURTENANCES OBSERVED IN THE FIELD. THE OWNER AND DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ACCURACY AND COMPLETENESS OF ANY SUCH INFORMATION OR DATA. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR; REVIEWING AND CHECKING ALL SUCH INFORMATION AND DATA; LOCATING ALL UNDERGROUND FACILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION; THE SAFETY AND PROTECTION THEREOF; REPAIRING ANY DAMAGE THERETO RESULTING FROM THE WORK. THE COST OF ALL WILL BE CONSIDERED AS HAVING BEEN INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACT PRICE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ANY AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANIES OR AGENCIES IN WRITING AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. C.PROTECTION OF EXISTING PLANT MATERIALS 1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL UNAUTHORIZED CUTTING OR DAMAGE TO TREES AND SHRUBS EXISTING OR OTHERWISE, CAUSED BY CARELESS EQUIPMENT OPERATION, MATERIAL STOCKPILING, ETC... THIS SHALL INCLUDE COMPACTION BY DRIVING OR PARKING INSIDE THE DRIP-LINE AND SPILLING OIL, GASOLINE, OR OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIALS WITHIN THE DRIP-LINE. NO MATERIALS SHALL BE BURNED ON SITE. EXISTING TREES KILLED OR DAMAGED SO THAT THEY ARE MISSHAPEN AND/OR UNSIGHTLY SHALL BE REPLACED AT THE COST TO THE CONTRACTOR OF THREE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($300) PER CALIPER INCH ON AN ESCALATING SCALE WHICH ADDS AN ADDITIONAL TWENTY (20) PERCENT PER INCH OVER FOUR (4) INCHES CALIPER AS FIXED AND AGREED LIQUIDATED DAMAGES. CALIPER SHALL BE MEASURED SIX (6) INCHES ABOVE GROUND LEVEL FOR TREES UP TO AND INCLUDING FOUR (4) INCHES IN CALIPER AND TWELVE (12) INCHES ABOVE GROUND LEVEL FOR TREES OVER FOUR (4) INCHES IN CALIPER. 2.SEE TREE MITIGATION PLAN AND NOTES, IF APPLICABLE. D.MATERIALS 1.GENERAL MATERIAL SAMPLES LISTED BELOW SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL, ON SITE OR AS DETERMINED BY THE OWNER. UPON APPROVAL, DELIVERY OF MATERIALS MAY COMMENCE. MATERIAL SAMPLE SIZE MULCH ONE (1) CUBIC FOOT TOPSOIL MIX ONE (1) CUBIC FOOT PLANTS ONE (1) OF EACH VARIETY (OR TAGGED IN NURSERY) 2.PLANT MATERIALS a.PLANT SPECIES AND SIZE SHALL CONFORM TO THOSE INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. ALL NURSERY STOCK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GRADES AND STANDARDS FOR NURSERY PLANTS, LATEST EDITION, PUBLISHED BY THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FLORIDA GRADE NO. 1 OR BETTER AS DETERMINED BY THE FLORIDA DIVISION OF PLANT INDUSTRY. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE HEALTHY, VIGOROUS, SOUND, WELL-BRANCHED, AND FREE OF DISEASE AND INSECTS, INSECT EGGS AND LARVAE AND SHALL HAVE ADEQUATE ROOT SYSTEMS. TREES FOR PLANTING IN ROWS SHALL BE UNIFORM IN SIZE AND SHAPE. ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE OWNER. WHERE ANY REQUIREMENTS ARE OMITTED FROM THE PLANT LIST, THE PLANTS FURNISHED SHALL BE NORMAL FOR THE VARIETY. PLANTS SHALL BE PRUNED PRIOR TO DELIVERY ONLY WITH APPROVAL FROM OWNER OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. NO SUBSTITUTIONS SHALL BE MADE WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. b.MEASUREMENTS: THE HEIGHT AND/OR WIDTH OF TREES SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE GROUND OR ACROSS THE NORMAL SPREAD OF BRANCHES WITH THE PLANTS IN THEIR NORMAL POSITION. THIS MEASUREMENT SHALL NOT INCLUDE THE IMMEDIATE TERMINAL GROWTH. PLANTS LARGER IN SIZE THAN THOSE SPECIFIED IN THE PLANT LIST MAY BE USED IF APPROVED BY THE OWNER. IF THE USE OF LARGER PLANTS IS APPROVED, THE BALL OF EARTH OR SPREAD OF ROOTS SHALL BE INCREASED IN PROPORTION TO THE SIZE OF THE PLANT. c.INSPECTION: PLANTS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO INSPECTION AND APPROVAL AT THE PLACE OF GROWTH, OR UPON DELIVERY TO THE SITE, AS DETERMINED BY THE OWNER, FOR QUALITY, SIZE, AND VARIETY. SUCH APPROVAL SHALL NOT IMPAIR THE RIGHT OF INSPECTION AND REJECTION AT THE SITE DURING PROGRESS OF THE WORK OR AFTER COMPLETION FOR SIZE AND CONDITION OF ROOT BALLS OR ROOTS, LATENT DEFECTS OR INJURIES. REJECTED PLANTS SHALL BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY FROM THE SITE. NOTICE REQUESTING INSPECTION SHALL BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING BY THE CONTRACTOR AT LEAST ONE (1) WEEK PRIOR TO ANTICIPATED DATE. E.SOIL MIXTURE (PLANTING MEDIUM, PLANTING MIX, TOPSOIL MIX) 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL TEST EXISTING SOIL AND AMEND AS NECESSARY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GUIDELINES BELOW: 2.SOIL MIXTURE (PLANTING MEDIUM FOR PLANT PITS) SHALL CONSIST OF TWO PARTS OF TOPSOIL AND ONE PART SAND, AS DESCRIBED BELOW. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT SAMPLES AND PH TESTING RESULTS OF SOIL MIXTURE FOR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE APPROVAL PRIOR TO PLANT INSTALLATION OPERATIONS COMMENCE. a.TOPSOIL FOR USE IN PREPARING SOIL MIXTURE FOR BACKFILLING PLANT PITS SHALL BE FERTILE, FRIABLE, AND OF A LOAMY CHARACTER; REASONABLY FREE OF SUBSOIL, CLAY LUMPS, BRUSH WEEDS AND OTHER LITTER; FREE OF ROOTS, STUMPS, STONES LARGER THAN 2" IN ANY DIRECTION, AND OTHER EXTRANEOUS OR TOXIC MATTER HARMFUL TO PLANT GROWTH. IT SHALL CONTAIN THREE (3) TO FIVE (5) PERCENT DECOMPOSED ORGANIC MATTER AND HAVE A PH BETWEEN 5.5 AND 7.0. b.SAND SHALL BE COARSE, CLEAN, WELL-DRAINING, NATIVE SAND. c.SOIL AMENDMENT (IF NEEDED PER SOIL TESTING) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND INSTALL A 3” LAYER OF AMENDED PLANTING SOIL IN ALL PLANTING BEDS, EXCLUDING SOD AREAS. THE AMENDED PLANTING SOIL SHALL BE COMPOSED OF 35% FERTICOMP 20% FLORIDA PEAT 45% SANDY LOAM. THE AMENDED PLANTING SOIL SHALL BE MIXED INTO THE BEDS UPON PLANTING. 2.TREES SHALL BE PLANTED IN THE EXISTING NATIVE SOIL ON SITE, UNLESS DETERMINED TO BE UNSUITABLE - AT WHICH POINT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE TO DISCUSS ALTERNATE RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO PLANTING (SUBMIT SOIL TESTING RESULTS AFTER INCORPORATING AMENDMENTS TO DEMNSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH SOIL QUALITY REQUIREMENTS . F.WATER 1.WATER NECESSARY FOR PLANTING AND MAINTENANCE SHALL BE OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY TO SUSTAIN ADEQUATE PLANT GROWTH AND SHALL NOT CONTAIN HARMFUL, NATURAL OR MAN-MADE ELEMENTS DETRIMENTAL TO PLANTS. WATER MEETING THE ABOVE STANDARD SHALL BE OBTAINED ON THE SITE FROM THE OWNER, IF AVAILABLE, AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR ITS USE BY HIS TANKS, HOSES, SPRINKLERS, ETC.... IF SUCH WATER IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THE SITE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SATISFACTORY WATER FROM SOURCES OFF THE SITE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. * WATERING/IRRIGATION RESTRICTIONS MAY APPLY - REFER TO PROPERTY'S JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY. G.FERTILIZER CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FERTILIZER APPLICATION SCHEDULE TO OWNER, AS APPLICABLE TO SOIL TYPE, PLANT INSTALLATION TYPE, AND SITE'S PROPOSED USE. SUGGESTED FERTILIZER TYPES SHALL BE ORGANIC OR OTHERWISE NATURALLY-DERIVED. * FERTILIZER RESTRICTIONS MAY APPLY - REFER TO PROPERTY'S JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY. H.MULCH 1.MULCH MATERIAL SHALL BE MOISTENED AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION TO PREVENT WIND DISPLACEMENT, AND APPLIED AT A DEPTH OF THREE (3) INCHES. CLEAR MULCH FROM EACH PLANT'S CROWN (BASE). MULCH SHALL BE "FLORIMULCH," EUCALYPTUS MULCH, OR SIMILAR SUSTAINABLY HARVESTED MULCH UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. 2.PROVIDE A THREE (3) INCH MINIMUM LAYER OF SPECIFIED MULCH OVER THE ENTIRE AREA OF EACH SHRUB BED, GROUND COVER, VINE BED, AND TREE PIT (6' MINIMUM) PLANTED UNDER THIS CONTRACT. I.DIGGING AND HANDLING 1.PROTECT ROOTS OR ROOT BALLS OF PLANTS AT ALL TIMES FROM SUN, DRYING WINDS, WATER AND FREEZING, AS NECESSARY UNTIL PLANTING. PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE ADEQUATELY PACKED TO PREVENT DAMAGE DURING TRANSIT. TREES TRANSPORTED MORE THAN TEN (10) MILES OR WHICH ARE NOT PLANTED WITHIN THREE (3) DAYS OF DELIVERY TO THE SITE SHALL BE SPRAYED WITH AN ANTITRANSPIRANT PRODUCT ("WILTPRUF" OR EQUAL) TO MINIMIZE TRANSPIRATIONAL WATER LOSS. 2.BALLED AND BURLAPPED (B&B), AND FIELD GROWN (FG) PLANTS SHALL BE DUG WITH FIRM, NATURAL BALLS OF SOIL OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO ENCOMPASS THE FIBROUS AND FEEDING ROOTS OF THE PLANTS. NO PLANTS MOVED WITH A ROOT BALL SHALL BE PLANTED IF THE BALL IS CRACKED OR BROKEN. PLANTS SHALL NOT BE HANDLED BY STEMS. 3.PLANTS MARKED "BR" IN THE PLANT LIST SHALL BE DUG WITH BARE ROOTS. CARE SHALL BE EXERCISED THAT THE ROOTS DO NOT DRY OUT DURING TRANSPORTATION AND PRIOR TO PLANTING. 4.PROTECTION OF PALMS: ONLY A MINIMUM OF FRONDS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE CROWN OF THE PALM TREES TO FACILITATE MOVING AND HANDLING. CLEAR TRUNK (CT) SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED AFTER THE MINIMUM OF FRONDS HAVE BEEN REMOVED. ALL PALMS SHALL BE BRACED PER PALM PLANTING DETAIL. 5.EXCAVATION OF TREE PITS SHALL BE PERFORMED USING EXTREME CARE TO AVOID DAMAGE TO SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE ELEMENTS SUCH AS UTILITIES OR HARDSCAPE ELEMENTS, FOOTERS AND PREPARED SUB-BASES. J.CONTAINER GROWN STOCK 1.ALL CONTAINER GROWN MATERIAL SHALL BE HEALTHY, VIGOROUS, WELL-ROOTED PLANTS ESTABLISHED IN THE CONTAINER IN WHICH THEY ARE SOLD. THE PLANTS SHALL HAVE TOPS WHICH ARE OF GOOD QUALITY AND ARE IN A HEALTHY GROWING CONDITION. 2.AN ESTABLISHED CONTAINER GROWN PLANT SHALL BE TRANSPLANTED INTO A CONTAINER AND GROWN IN THAT CONTAINER SUFFICIENTLY LONG ENOUGH FOR THE NEW FIBROUS ROOTS TO HAVE DEVELOPED SO THAT THE ROOT MASS WILL RETAIN ITS SHAPE AND HOLD TOGETHER WHEN REMOVED FROM THE CONTAINER. CONTAINER GROWN STOCK SHALL NOT BE HANDLED BY THEIR STEMS. 3.ROOT BOUND PLANTS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE AND WILL BE REJECTED. 4.RPG= "ROOTS PLUS GROWER" CONTAINER PRODUCTS SHALL BE USED WHERE SPECIFIED. K.COLLECTED STOCK WHEN THE USE OF COLLECTED STOCK IS PERMITTED AS INDICATED BY THE OWNER OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE, THE MINIMUM SIZES OF ROOTBALLS SHALL BE EQUAL TO THAT SPECIFIED FOR THE NEXT LARGER SIZE OF NURSERY GROWN STOCK OF THE SAME VARIETY. L.NATIVE STOCK PLANTS COLLECTED FROM WILD OR NATIVE STANDS SHALL BE CONSIDERED NURSERY GROWN WHEN THEY HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFULLY RE-ESTABLISHED IN A NURSERY ROW AND GROWN UNDER REGULAR NURSERY CULTURAL PRACTICES FOR A MINIMUM OF TWO (2) GROWING SEASONS AND HAVE ATTAINED ADEQUATE ROOT AND TOP GROWTH TO INDICATE FULL RECOVERY FROM TRANSPLANTING INTO THE NURSERY ROW. M.MATERIALS LIST QUANTITIES NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE FURNISHED BY THE CONTRACTOR. QUANTITY ESTIMATES HAVE BEEN MADE CAREFULLY, BUT THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR OWNER ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORS. SHOULD A DISCREPANCY OCCUR BETWEEN THE PLANS AND THE PLANT LIST QUANTITY, THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE NOTIFIED FOR CLARIFICATION PRIOR TO BIDDING OR INSTALLATION. ALL DIMENSIONS AND/OR SIZES SPECIFIED SHALL BE THE MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE SIZE. N.FINE GRADING 1.FINE GRADING UNDER THIS CONTRACT SHALL CONSIST OF FINAL FINISHED GRADING OF LAWN AND PLANTING AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN ROUGH GRADED BY OTHERS. BERMING AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FINE GRADE THE LAWN AND PLANTING AREAS TO BRING THE ROUGH GRADE UP TO FINAL FINISHED GRADE ALLOWING FOR THICKNESS OF SOD AND/OR MULCH DEPTH. CONTRACTOR SHALL FINE GRADE BY HAND AND/OR WITH ALL EQUIPMENT NECESSARY INCLUDING A GRADING TRACTOR WITH FRONT-END LOADER FOR TRANSPORTING SOIL WITHIN THE SITE. 3.ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE GRADED AND MAINTAINED FOR POSITIVE DRAINAGE TO SURFACE/SUBSURFACE STORM DRAIN SYSTEMS. AREAS ADJACENT TO BUILDINGS SHALL SLOPE AWAY FROM THE BUILDINGS. REFER TO CIVIL ENGINEER'S PLANS FOR FINAL GRADES, IF APPLICABLE. O.PLANTING PROCEDURES 1.CLEANING UP BEFORE COMMENCING WORK: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAN WORK AND SURROUNDING AREAS OF ALL RUBBISH OR OBJECTIONABLE MATTER DAILY. ALL MORTAR, CEMENT, AND TOXIC MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SURFACE OF ALL PLANT BEDS. THESE MATERIALS SHALL NOT BE MIXED WITH THE SOIL. SHOULD THE CONTRACTOR FIND SUCH SOIL CONDITIONS BENEATH THE SOIL WHICH WILL IN ANY WAY ADVERSELY AFFECT THE PLANT GROWTH, HE SHALL IMMEDIATELY CALL IT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. FAILURE TO DO SO BEFORE PLANTING SHALL MAKE THE CORRECTIVE MEASURES THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 2.VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES, CONDUITS, SUPPLY LINES AND CABLES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: ELECTRIC, GAS (LINES AND TANKS), WATER, SANITARY SEWER, STORMWATER SYSTEMS, CABLE, AND TELEPHONE. PROPERLY MAINTAIN AND PROTECT EXISTING UTILITIES. CALL SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA, INC. (811) TO LOCATE UTILITIES AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3.SUBGRADE EXCAVATION: CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO REMOVE ALL EXISTING AND IMPORTED LIMEROCK AND LIMEROCK SUB-BASE FROM ALL LANDSCAPE PLANTING AREAS TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 36" OR TO NATIVE SOIL. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO BACKFILL THESE PLANTING AREAS TO ROUGH FINISHED GRADE WITH CLEAN TOPSOIL FROM AN ON-SITE SOURCE OR AN IMPORTED SOURCE. IF LIMEROCK OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITIONS OCCUR IN PLANTED AREAS AFTER 36" DEEP EXCAVATION BY THE CONTRACTOR, AND POSITIVE DRAINAGE CAN NOT BE ACHIEVED, CONTRACTOR SHALL UTILIZE POOR DRAINAGE CONDITION PLANTING DETAIL. 4.FURNISH NURSERY'S CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS AS SPECIFIED HEREIN. INSPECT AND SELECT PLANT MATERIALS BEFORE PLANTS ARE DUG AT NURSERY OR GROWING SITE. 5.COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, COUNTY, AND LOCAL REGULATIONS GOVERNING LANDSCAPE MATERIALS AND WORK. CONFORM TO ACCEPTED HORTICULTURAL PRACTICES AS USED IN THE TRADE. UPON ARRIVAL AT THE SITE, PLANTS SHALL BE THOROUGHLY WATERED AND PROPERLY MAINTAINED UNTIL PLANTED. PLANTS STORED ONSITE SHALL NOT REMAIN UNPLANTED OR APPROPRIATELY HEALED IN FOR A PERIOD EXCEEDING TWENTY-FOUR (24) HOURS. AT ALL TIMES WORKMANLIKE METHODS CUSTOMARY IN GOOD HORTICULTURAL PRACTICES SHALL BE EXERCISED. 6.THE WORK SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH OTHER TRADES TO PREVENT CONFLICTS. COORDINATE PLANTING WITH IRRIGATION WORK TO ASSURE AVAILABILITY OF WATER AND PROPER LOCATION OF IRRIGATION APPURTENANCES AND PLANTS. 7.ALL PLANTING PITS SHALL BE EXCAVATED TO SIZE AND DEPTH IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE USA STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK 260.1, UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS, AND BACK FILLED WITH THE PREPARED PLANTING SOIL MIXTURE AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION E. TEST ALL TREE PITS WITH WATER BEFORE PLANTING TO ASSURE PROPER DRAINAGE PERCOLATION IS AVAILABLE. NO ALLOWANCE WILL BE MADE FOR LOST PLANTS DUE TO IMPROPER DRAINAGE. IF POOR DRAINAGE EXISTS, UTILIZE "POOR DRAINAGE CONDITION" PLANTING DETAIL. TREES SHALL BE SET PLUMB AND HELD IN POSITION UNTIL THE PLANTING MIXTURE HAS BEEN FLUSHED INTO PLACE WITH A SLOW, FULL HOSE STREAM. ALL PLANTING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY PERSONNEL FAMILIAR WITH PLANTING PROCEDURES AND UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF A QUALIFIED LANDSCAPE FOREMAN. PROPER "JETTING IN" SHALL BE ASSURED TO ELIMINATE AIR POCKETS AROUND THE ROOTS. "JET STICK" OR EQUAL IS RECOMMENDED. 8.TAKE ALL NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO AVOID DAMAGE TO BUILDINGS AND BUILDING STRUCTURES WHILE INSTALLING TREES. 9.SOIL MIXTURE SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION E OF THESE SPECIFICATIONS. 10.TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL BE SET STRAIGHT AT AN ELEVATION THAT, AFTER SETTLEMENT, THE PLANT CROWN WILL STAND ONE (1) TO TWO (2) INCHES ABOVE GRADE. EACH PLANT SHALL BE SET IN THE CENTER OF THE PIT. PLANTING SOIL MIXTURE SHALL BE BACK FILLED, THOROUGHLY TAMPED AROUND THE BALL, AND SETTLED BY WATER (AFTER TAMPING). 11.AMEND PINE AND OAK PLANT PITS WITH ECTOMYCORRHIZAL SOIL APPLICATION PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION. ALL OTHER PLANT PITS SHALL BE AMENDED WITH ENDOMYCORRHIZAL SOIL APPLICATION PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION. PROVIDE PRODUCT INFORMATION SUBMITTAL PRIOR TO INOCULATION. 12.FILL HOLE WITH SOIL MIXTURE, MAKING CERTAIN ALL SOIL IS SATURATED. TO DO THIS, FILL HOLE WITH WATER AND ALLOW TO SOAK MINIMUM TWENTY (20) MINUTES, STIRRING IF NECESSARY TO GET SOIL THOROUGHLY WET. PACK LIGHTLY WITH FEET, ADD MORE WET SOIL MIXTURE. DO NOT COVER TOP OF BALL WITH SOIL MIXTURE. ALL BURLAP, ROPE, WIRES, BASKETS, ETC.., SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SIDES AND TOPS OF BALLS, BUT NO BURLAP SHALL BE PULLED FROM UNDERNEATH. 13.TREES SHALL BE PRUNED, AT THE DIRECTION OF THE OWNER OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE, TO PRESERVE THE NATURAL CHARACTER OF THE PLANT. ALL SOFT WOOD OR SUCKER GROWTH AND ALL BROKEN OR BADLY DAMAGED BRANCHES SHALL BE REMOVED WITH A CLEAN CUT. ALL PRUNING TO BE PERFORMED BY CERTIFIED ARBORIST, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI A-300. 14.SHRUBS AND GROUND COVER PLANTS SHALL BE EVENLY SPACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DRAWINGS AND AS INDICATED ON THE PLANT LIST. MATERIALS INSTALLED SHALL MEET MINIMUM SPECIMEN REQUIREMENTS OR QUANTITIES SHOW ON PLANS, WHICHEVER IS GREATER. CULTIVATE ALL PLANTING AREAS TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6", REMOVE AND DISPOSE ALL DEBRIS. MIX TOP 4" THE PLANTING SOIL MIXTURE AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION E. THOROUGHLY WATER ALL PLANTS AFTER INSTALLATION. 15.TREE GUYING AND BRACING SHALL BE INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS TO INSURE STABILITY AND MAINTAIN TREES IN AN UPRIGHT POSITION. IF THE CONTRACTOR AND OWNER DECIDE TO WAIVE THE TREE GUYING AND BRACING, THE OWNER SHALL NOTIFY THE PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN WRITING AND AGREE TO INDEMNIFY AND HOLD HARMLESS THE PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN THE EVENT UNSUPPORTED TREES PLANTED UNDER THIS CONTRACT FALL AND DAMAGE PERSON OR PROPERTY. 16.ALL PLANT BEDS SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF NOXIOUS WEEDS UNTIL FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF WORK. IF DIRECTED BY THE OWNER, "ROUND-UP" SHALL BE APPLIED FOR WEED CONTROL BY QUALIFIED PERSONNEL TO ALL PLANTING AREAS IN SPOT APPLICATIONS PER MANUFACTURER'S PRECAUTIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS. PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION, TREAT ALL PLANTING BEDS WITH AN APPROVED PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDE AT AN APPLICATION RATE RECOMMENDED BY THE MANUFACTURER. (AS ALLOWED BY JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY) P.LAWN SODDING 1.THE WORK CONSISTS OF LAWN BED PREPARATION, SOIL PREPARATION, AND SODDING COMPLETE, IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS AND THE APPLICABLE DRAWINGS TO PRODUCE A TURF GRASS LAWN ACCEPTABLE TO THE OWNER. 2.ALL AREAS THAT ARE TO BE SODDED SHALL BE CLEARED OF ANY ROUGH GRASS, WEEDS, AND DEBRIS BY MEANS OF A SOD CUTTER TO A DEPTH OF THREE (3) INCHES, AND THE GROUND BROUGHT TO AN EVEN GRADE. THE ENTIRE SURFACE SHALL BE ROLLED WITH A ROLLER WEIGHING NOT MORE THAN ONE-HUNDRED (100) POUNDS PER FOOT OF WIDTH. DURING THE ROLLING, ALL DEPRESSIONS CAUSED BY SETTLEMENT SHALL BE FILLED WITH ADDITIONAL SOIL, AND THE SURFACE SHALL BE REGRADED AND ROLLED UNTIL PRESENTING A SMOOTH AND EVEN FINISH TO THE REQUIRED GRADE. 3.PREPARE LOOSE BED FOUR (4) INCHES DEEP. HAND RAKE UNTIL ALL BUMPS AND DEPRESSIONS ARE REMOVED. WET PREPARED AREA THOROUGHLY. 4.SODDING a.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SOD ALL AREAS THAT ARE NOT PAVED OR PLANTED AS DESIGNATED ON THE DRAWINGS WITHIN THE CONTRACT LIMITS, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED OTHERWISE. b.THE SOD SHALL BE CERTIFIED TO MEET FLORIDA STATE PLANT BOARD SPECIFICATIONS, ABSOLUTELY TRUE TO VARIETAL TYPE, AND FREE FROM WEEDS, FUNGUS, INSECTS AND DISEASE OF ANY KIND. c.SOD PANELS SHALL BE LAID TIGHTLY TOGETHER SO AS TO MAKE A SOLID SODDED LAWN AREA. SOD SHALL BE LAID UNIFORMLY AGAINST THE EDGES OF ALL CURBS AND OTHER HARDSCAPE ELEMENTS, PAVED AND PLANTED AREAS. ADJACENT TO BUILDINGS, A 24 INCH STONE MULCH STRIP SHALL BE PROVIDED. IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING SOD LAYING, THE LAWN AREAS SHALL BE ROLLED WITH A LAWN ROLLER CUSTOMARILY USED FOR SUCH PURPOSES, AND THEN THOROUGHLY IRRIGATED. IF, IN THE OPINION OF THE OWNER, TOP-DRESSING IS NECESSARY AFTER ROLLING TO FILL THE VOIDS BETWEEN THE SOD PANELS AND TO EVEN OUT INCONSISTENCIES IN THE SOD, CLEAN SAND, AS APPROVED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE, SHALL BE UNIFORMLY SPREAD OVER THE ENTIRE SURFACE OF THE SOD AND THOROUGHLY WATERED IN. FERTILIZE INSTALLED SOD AS ALLOWED BY PROPERTY'S JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY. 5.DURING DELIVERY, PRIOR TO, AND DURING THE PLANTING OF THE LAWN AREAS, THE SOD PANELS SHALL AT ALL TIMES BE PROTECTED FROM EXCESSIVE DRYING AND UNNECESSARY EXPOSURE OF THE ROOTS TO THE SUN. ALL SOD SHALL BE STACKED SO AS NOT TO BE DAMAGED BY SWEATING OR EXCESSIVE HEAT AND MOISTURE. 6.LAWN MAINTENANCE a.WITHIN THE CONTRACT LIMITS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PRODUCE A DENSE, WELL ESTABLISHED LAWN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REPAIR AND RE-SODDING OF ALL ERODED, SUNKEN OR BARE SPOTS (LARGER THAN 12"X12") UNTIL CERTIFICATION OF ACCEPTANCE BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. REPAIRED SODDING SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED AS IN THE ORIGINAL WORK (INCLUDING REGRADING IF NECESSARY). b.CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR ESTABLISHING AND MAINTAINING SOD/LAWN UNTIL ACCEPTANCE BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. PRIOR TO AND UPON ACCEPTANCE, CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE WATERING/IRRIGATION SCHEDULE TO OWNER. OBSERVE ALL APPLICABLE WATERING RESTRICTIONS AS SET FORTH BY THE PROPERTY'S JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY. Q.CLEANUP UPON COMPLETION OF ALL PLANTING WORK AND BEFORE FINAL ACCEPTANCE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, AND DEBRIS RESULTING FROM HIS WORK. ALL PAVED AREAS SHALL BE CLEANED AND THE SITE LEFT IN A NEAT AND ACCEPTABLE CONDITION AS APPROVED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. R.PLANT MATERIAL MAINTENANCE ALL PLANTS AND PLANTING INCLUDED UNDER THIS CONTRACT SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY WATERING, CULTIVATING, SPRAYING, AND ALL OTHER OPERATIONS (SUCH AS RE-STAKING OR REPAIRING GUY SUPPORTS) NECESSARY TO INSURE A HEALTHY PLANT CONDITION BY THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL CERTIFICATION OF ACCEPTANCE BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. S.FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF WORK FINAL INSPECTION AT THE END OF THE WARRANTY PERIOD SHALL BE ON PLANTING, CONSTRUCTION AND ALL OTHER INCIDENTAL WORK PERTAINING TO THIS CONTRACT. ANY REPLACEMENT AT THIS TIME SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE SAME ONE (1) YEAR WARRANTY (OR AS SPECIFIED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR OWNER IN WRITING) BEGINNING WITH THE TIME OF REPLACEMENT AND ENDING WITH THE SAME INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE HEREIN DESCRIBED. T.WARRANTY 1.THE LIFE AND SATISFACTORY CONDITION OF ALL PLANT MATERIAL INSTALLED (INCLUDING SOD) BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE WARRANTED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) CALENDAR YEAR COMMENCING AT THE TIME OF CERTIFICATION OF ACCEPTANCE BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 2.ANY PLANT NOT FOUND IN A HEALTHY GROWING CONDITION AT THE END OF THE WARRANTY PERIOD SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND REPLACED AS SOON AS WEATHER CONDITIONS PERMIT. ALL REPLACEMENTS SHALL BE PLANTS OF THE SAME KIND AND SIZE AS SPECIFIED IN THE PLANT LIST. THEY SHALL BE FURNISHED PLANTED AND MULCHED AS SPECIFIED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. 3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WATERING OF LANDSCAPE MOWING, BLOWING, EDGING, TRIMMING, PRUNING, WEEDING, SPRAYING OF PESTICIDES, FUNGICIDES AND HERBICIDES, FROM CONSTRUCTION START THROUGH OWNER FINAL PROJECT ACCEPTANCE. 4.IN THE EVENT THE OWNER DOES NOT CONTRACT WITH THE CONTRACTOR FOR LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE, THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD VISIT THE PROJECT SITE PERIODICALLY DURING THE ONE (1) YEAR WARRANTY PERIOD TO EVALUATE MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES BEING PERFORMED BY THE OWNER. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER IN WRITING OF MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES OR CONDITIONS WHICH THREATEN VIGOROUS AND HEALTHY PLANT GROWTH. SITE VISITS SHALL BE CONDUCTED A MINIMUM OF ONCE PER MONTH FOR A PERIOD OF TWELVE (12) MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE. 5.PALM INOCULATION: ALL PHOENIX GENUS AND BISMARKIA GENUS PALMS SHALL BE INOCULATED AGAINST LETHAL BRONZING PRIOR TO LEAVING THE TREE FARM/NURSERY. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PROOF OF INOCULATION AND CERTIFICATION THAT THE PALMS ARE HEALTHY AND FREE OF ALL DISEASE. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR INOCULATION OF THE PALMS, ONCE PLANTED, TO THE END OF THE WARRANTY PERIOD. GENERAL LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS AND NOTES 1 L1.51 1328 STOP STOP 1 2 3 4 10 STATE ROAD 434 RO B E R T S F A M I L Y L A N E T U S K A W I L L A R O A D TPF TP F MFS C RS 18 18 BFP W W W W W A A GA S M P D GA S M P D GA S M P D GA S M P D GA S M P D GA S M P D E U45 M 4,736 GSF Type VB Construction CARDBOARD RECYCLING CONTAINER MPT TRASH COMPACTOR ICE (Customer) IC E ( A s s o c i a t e ) S t o p B a r Dou b l e Y e l l o w S t r i p e Stop Bar Stop Bar Stop Bar Stop Bar Stop Bar St o p B a r BY DA T E AS S H O W N RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E SHEET NUMBER CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T DA T E : LI C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L 68 7 6 M A R W I C K L A N E , S U I T E 3 5 0 , O R L A N D O , F L 3 2 8 2 7 PH O N E : ( 4 0 7 ) 5 3 6 - 4 4 4 0 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M R E G I S T R Y N o . 3 5 1 0 6 RE V I S E D P E R C I T Y C O M M E N T S 07 / 1 7 / 2 5 MM B 1 Pl o t t e d B y : Mi a h , I f r i t S h e e t S e t : WI N T E R S P R I N G S M A R K E T P L A C E - A D D I T I O N A L P A R K I N G L a y o u t : L2 . 0 0 Ju l y 1 7 , 2 0 2 5 0 3 : 2 4 : 2 5 p m K: \ o r l _ c i v i l \ 1 4 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 - w i n t e r s p r i n g s w a w a \ C A D D \ C O N S T \ p l a n s h e e t s - a d d p a r k i n g \ L 2 . 0 0 I R R I G A T I O N P L A N . d w g WI N T E R S P R I N G S WA W A IR R I G A T I O N O V E R A L L FL CI T Y O F W I N T E R S P R I N G S L2.00 14 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 07 / 1 7 / 2 0 2 5 AD L JC B CN S NOTE: IF SOURCE TO BE RECLAIMED (NON-POTABLE) ALL EQUIPMENT TO BE INDICATED AS SUCH AND PURPLE IN COLOR. FOLLOW ALL LOCAL JURISDICTION STANDARDS FOR RECLAIMED IRRIGATION SYSTEMS. CONTRACTOR TO ADJUST ALL OVERHEAD SPRAY HEADS TO ENSURE MINIMAL OVER-SPRAY OCCURS ON ANY HARDSCAPE SURFACE (TYP). CONTRACTOR TO PERMANENTLY MARK ALL SLEEVE CROSSINGS AT ASSOCIATED TOPS OF CURB (TYP). IRRIGATION NOTES 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, ELEVATIONS, EQUIPMENT QUANTITIES, ETC. PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK. 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES IN PLANS OR SPECIFICATIONS PRIOR TO BEGINNING OR CONTINUING WORK. 3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE NO SUBSTITUTIONS, DELETIONS, OR ADDITIONS TO THIS PLAN WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 4.ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO CITY, COUNTY, STATE, AND FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE THAT ALL IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MEETS GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY NECESSARY PERMITS OR APPROVALS. 5.THIS PLAN IS SCHEMATIC AND DUE TO THE NATURE OF CONSTRUCTION SLIGHT FIELD MODIFICATIONS MAY BE NECESSARY TO IMPLEMENT PLAN. 6.CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ACTUAL AVAILABLE WATER PRESSURE BEFORE BEGINNING INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IF AVAILABLE WATER PRESSURE WILL NOT ALLOW SYSTEM MODIFICATION TO BE POSSIBLE. 7.IRRIGATION SYSTEMS CONNECTED TO POTABLE WATER SUPPLY, SHALL HAVE A BACKFLOW PREVENTER INSTALLED. 8.WHERE APPLICABLE IRRIGATION HEADS ARE TO BE ADJUSTED FOR COMPLETE COVERAGE WITH MINIMUM OVER SPRAY BEYOND LANDSCAPE AREAS. 9.EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE. DO NOT TRENCH OR EXCAVATE WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE OF ANY TREE. 10.ALL IRRIGATION SLEEVING TO BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR. ELECTRICAL WIRES FOR IRRIGATION VALVES AND IRRIGATION LINES ARE TO BE PLACED IN SEPARATE SLEEVES. 11.IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW WINTERIZATION PROCEDURES FOR IRRIGATION SYSTEM WITH OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 12.ALL PLANT MATERIAL IN TREE HOLDING AREAS SHALL BE MANUALLY WATERED/IRRIGATED TO KEEP MOIST UNTIL PLANTED. 13.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE PERMANENT BENCH-MARKS ON ALL CURB LINES AT RELATED SLEEVE LOCATIONS (TYP). 14.THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED TO MINIMIZE ROOT DISTURBANCE IN EXISTING TREES. 15.IRRIGATION SPRAYS AND ROTORS ARE NOT COMBINED ON THE SAME CONTROL VALVE CIRCUIT - LANDSCAPE BEDS AND TURF ON SEPARATE CIRCUITS. 16.MATCH PRECIPITATION RATES WITH ANY HEADS THAT ARE REPLACED. NO R T H L2.01 L2.02 COORDINATE/DISCUSS PROJECT LIMITS WITH GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE ALL IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT IS INSTALLED WITHIN PROJECT AREA. NOT ALL NECESSARY SLEEVES SHOWN. INSTALL WHERE NECESSARY AND COORDINATE WITH OTHER DISCIPLINES TO AVOID CONFLICTS AND FACILITATE THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EVALUATING/ CONNECTING TO EXISTING SYSTEM AND ZONING (POTENTIALLY ADDING NEW VALVES) AS NECESSARY. FIELD LOCATE ALL EQUIPMENT NEEDED FOR IRRIGATION MODIFICATION/EXPANSION. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO DETERMINE P.O.C FOR INCLUSION INTO THE SYSTEM (INCLUDES ALL NECESSARY BORING, TRENCHING, ETC.) IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PERFORMING ALL NECESSARY MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED TO MEET THE SCHEMATIC INTENT OF THESE PLANS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING PROPOSAL. THESE PLANS OUTLINE THE OVERALL LAYOUT THE SYSTEM AND IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO ZONE THE SYSTEM ACCORDINGLY BASED ON FLOW AND PRESSURE AVAILABLE. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE FOLLOWING BUT NOT LIMITED TO AVAILABLE FLOW, AVAILABLE PRESSURE, CONNECTION ASSEMBLY, CAPACITY OF THE SYSTEM. 1329 SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION QTY PSI RAIN BIRD R-VAN14 RD-06-S-P45-F TURF ROTARY, 8FT.-14FT. 45-270 DEGREES AND 360 DEGREES. HAND ADJUSTABLE MULTI-STREAM ROTARY W/RD1800 TURF SPRAY BODY ON 6IN. POP-UP, WITH CHECK VALVE AND 45 PSI IN-STEM PRESSURE REGULATOR. FLOW-SHIELD TECHNOLOGY. 1/2IN. NPT FEMALE THREADED INLET. 5 30 RAIN BIRD R-VAN18 RD-06-S-P45-F TURF ROTARY, 13FT.-18FT. 45-270 DEGREES AND 360 DEGREES. HAND ADJUSTABLE MULTI-STREAM ROTARY W/RD1800 TURF SPRAY BODY ON 6IN. POP-UP, WITH CHECK VALVE AND 45 PSI IN-STEM PRESSURE REGULATOR. FLOW-SHIELD TECHNOLOGY. 1/2IN. NPT FEMALE THREADED INLET. 2 30 RAIN BIRD 1806-SAM-NP-1400 FLOOD FLOOD BUBBLER 6IN. POPUP WITH CHECK VALVE, AND NON-POTABLE PURPLE CAP. INSTALL W/ PA-80 ADAPTER. 2 20 SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION QTY AREA TO RECEIVE DRIPLINE RAIN BIRD XFDEP-09-12 XFDE ON-SURFACE PRESSURE COMPENSATING LANDSCAPE DRIPLINE. 0.9 GPH EMITTERS AT 12" O.C. DRIPLINE LATERALS SPACED AT 12" APART, WITH EMITTERS OFFSET FOR TRIANGULAR PATTERN. UV & KINK RESISTANT. USE XF INSERT FITTINGS. 345.2 LF SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION QTY IRRIGATION MAINLINE: PVC SCHEDULE 40 132.5 LF PIPE SLEEVE: PVC SCHEDULE 40 - MAINLINE 57.0 LF 14 ADJ 14 F 18 18 18 ADJ 18 F 1402 14041401 IRRIGATION SCHEDULE TURN MODIFICATION FLOW TOTALS TURN MODIFICATION Area for Dripline:5.2 Bubbler:0.5 Turf Rotary:3.3 Total:9.0 GPM RO B E R T S F A M I L Y L A N E TPFTP F TPF TP F C RS 18 18 BY DA T E AS S H O W N RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E SHEET NUMBER CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T DA T E : LI C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L 68 7 6 M A R W I C K L A N E , S U I T E 3 5 0 , O R L A N D O , F L 3 2 8 2 7 PH O N E : ( 4 0 7 ) 5 3 6 - 4 4 4 0 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M R E G I S T R Y N o . 3 5 1 0 6 RE V I S E D P E R C I T Y C O M M E N T S 07 / 1 7 / 2 5 MM B 1 Pl o t t e d B y : Mi a h , I f r i t S h e e t S e t : WI N T E R S P R I N G S M A R K E T P L A C E - A D D I T I O N A L P A R K I N G L a y o u t : L2 . 0 1 Ju l y 1 7 , 2 0 2 5 0 4 : 3 7 : 0 1 p m K: \ o r l _ c i v i l \ 1 4 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 - w i n t e r s p r i n g s w a w a \ C A D D \ C O N S T \ p l a n s h e e t s - a d d p a r k i n g \ L 2 . 0 0 I R R I G A T I O N P L A N . d w g WI N T E R S P R I N G S WA W A IR R I G A T I O N P L A N FL CI T Y O F W I N T E R S P R I N G S L2.01 14 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 07 / 1 7 / 2 0 2 5 AD L JC B CN S NO R T H NOTE: IF SOURCE TO BE RECLAIMED (NON-POTABLE) ALL EQUIPMENT TO BE INDICATED AS SUCH AND PURPLE IN COLOR. FOLLOW ALL LOCAL JURISDICTION STANDARDS FOR RECLAIMED IRRIGATION SYSTEMS. CONTRACTOR TO ADJUST ALL OVERHEAD SPRAY HEADS TO ENSURE MINIMAL OVER-SPRAY OCCURS ON ANY HARDSCAPE SURFACE (TYP). CONTRACTOR TO PERMANENTLY MARK ALL SLEEVE CROSSINGS AT ASSOCIATED TOPS OF CURB (TYP). COORDINATE/DISCUSS PROJECT LIMITS WITH GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE ALL IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT IS INSTALLED WITHIN PROJECT AREA. NOT ALL NECESSARY SLEEVES SHOWN. INSTALL WHERE NECESSARY AND COORDINATE WITH OTHER DISCIPLINES TO AVOID CONFLICTS AND FACILITATE THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EVALUATING/ CONNECTING TO EXISTING SYSTEM AND ZONING (POTENTIALLY ADDING NEW VALVES) AS NECESSARY. FIELD LOCATE ALL EQUIPMENT NEEDED FOR IRRIGATION MODIFICATION/EXPANSION. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO DETERMINE P.O.C FOR INCLUSION INTO THE SYSTEM (INCLUDES ALL NECESSARY BORING, TRENCHING, ETC.) 1330 STOP 1 2 3 4 10 T U S K A W I L L A R O A D W W W W W W W W W PROPOSED BUILDING 4,736 SF 4,736 GSF Type VB Construction CARDBOARD RECYCLING CONTAINER S t o p B a r Dou b l e Y e l l o w S t r i p e Stop Bar Stop Bar L C BY DA T E AS S H O W N RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E SHEET NUMBER CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T DA T E : LI C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L 68 7 6 M A R W I C K L A N E , S U I T E 3 5 0 , O R L A N D O , F L 3 2 8 2 7 PH O N E : ( 4 0 7 ) 5 3 6 - 4 4 4 0 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M R E G I S T R Y N o . 3 5 1 0 6 RE V I S E D P E R C I T Y C O M M E N T S 07 / 1 7 / 2 5 MM B 1 Pl o t t e d B y : Mi a h , I f r i t S h e e t S e t : WI N T E R S P R I N G S M A R K E T P L A C E - A D D I T I O N A L P A R K I N G L a y o u t : L2 . 0 2 Ju l y 1 7 , 2 0 2 5 0 4 : 3 7 : 1 1 p m K: \ o r l _ c i v i l \ 1 4 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 - w i n t e r s p r i n g s w a w a \ C A D D \ C O N S T \ p l a n s h e e t s - a d d p a r k i n g \ L 2 . 0 0 I R R I G A T I O N P L A N . d w g WI N T E R S P R I N G S WA W A IR R I G A T I O N P L A N FL CI T Y O F W I N T E R S P R I N G S L2.02 14 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 07 / 1 7 / 2 0 2 5 AD L JC B CN S NO R T H NOTE: IF SOURCE TO BE RECLAIMED (NON-POTABLE) ALL EQUIPMENT TO BE INDICATED AS SUCH AND PURPLE IN COLOR. FOLLOW ALL LOCAL JURISDICTION STANDARDS FOR RECLAIMED IRRIGATION SYSTEMS. CONTRACTOR TO ADJUST ALL OVERHEAD SPRAY HEADS TO ENSURE MINIMAL OVER-SPRAY OCCURS ON ANY HARDSCAPE SURFACE (TYP). CONTRACTOR TO PERMANENTLY MARK ALL SLEEVE CROSSINGS AT ASSOCIATED TOPS OF CURB (TYP). COORDINATE/DISCUSS PROJECT LIMITS WITH GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE ALL IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT IS INSTALLED WITHIN PROJECT AREA. NOT ALL NECESSARY SLEEVES SHOWN. INSTALL WHERE NECESSARY AND COORDINATE WITH OTHER DISCIPLINES TO AVOID CONFLICTS AND FACILITATE THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EVALUATING/ CONNECTING TO EXISTING SYSTEM AND ZONING (POTENTIALLY ADDING NEW VALVES) AS NECESSARY. FIELD LOCATE ALL EQUIPMENT NEEDED FOR IRRIGATION MODIFICATION/EXPANSION. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO DETERMINE P.O.C FOR INCLUSION INTO THE SYSTEM (INCLUDES ALL NECESSARY BORING, TRENCHING, ETC.) IRRIGATE TO ESTABLISHMENT IRRIGATE TO ESTABLISHMENT 1331 BY DA T E AS S H O W N RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E SHEET NUMBER CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T DA T E : LI C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L 68 7 6 M A R W I C K L A N E , S U I T E 3 5 0 , O R L A N D O , F L 3 2 8 2 7 PH O N E : ( 4 0 7 ) 5 3 6 - 4 4 4 0 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M R E G I S T R Y N o . 3 5 1 0 6 RE V I S E D P E R C I T Y C O M M E N T S 07 / 1 7 / 2 5 MM B 1 Pl o t t e d B y : Mi a h , I f r i t S h e e t S e t : WI N T E R S P R I N G S M A R K E T P L A C E - A D D I T I O N A L P A R K I N G L a y o u t : L2 . 5 0 Ju l y 1 7 , 2 0 2 5 0 3 : 2 4 : 5 4 p m K: \ o r l _ c i v i l \ 1 4 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 - w i n t e r s p r i n g s w a w a \ C A D D \ C O N S T \ p l a n s h e e t s - a d d p a r k i n g \ L 2 . 0 0 I R R I G A T I O N P L A N . d w g WI N T E R S P R I N G S WA W A IR R I G A I T O N D E T A I L S FL CI T Y O F W I N T E R S P R I N G S L2.50 14 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 07 / 1 7 / 2 0 2 5 AD L JC B CN S NTS NTS TYPICAL BUBBLER SECTION NTS NOTE: BUBBLER SHALL NOT BE PLACED AT TRUNK FLARE. PVC SLIP-THREAD ADAPTOR. BUBBLER NOZZLE AS SPECIFIED. 3" A B O V E G R A D E WATER WELL AS PER PLANTER DETAIL. FINISHED GRADE. 12 " B E L O W G R A D E PVC SLIP-THREAD ADAPTER. PVC LATERAL LINE. 1 2" IPS FLEX HOSE WITH PVC FLEX GLUE AND PRIMER 5' LENGTH MIN. 12 L2.50 LATERAL PIPE TYPICAL IRRIGATION HEAD SECTION NTS 12 " M I N 6" CLEAR NOZZLESFINISHED GRADE/TOP OF MULCH 1/2" FLEX PIPE, LENGTH AS NEEDED SCH 40 SWEEP ELBOW LATERAL TEE POP-UP SPRAY SPRINKLER ON 6"OR 12" RISER (UNLESS SPECIFIED PER IRRIGATION SCHEDULE 8 L2.50 4 5 3 2 1 TURF GRASS VALVE BOX LID FINISH GRADE 12" AIR RELIEF VALVE: TO BE INSTALLED AT HIGH POINTS IN DRIP ZONE 12" X 3 4" PVC REDUCER BUSHING BARB X FEMALE THREAD CONNECTOR: 12" BLANK DRIPLINE TUBING: BARB X MALE THREAD CONNECTOR: PVC TEE CONNECTED TO PVC HEADER PIPE 3" MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3 4" WASHED GRAVEL BRICK (1 OF 2) 7 1 2 6 10 11 7 8 9 8 9 4 10 5 6 3 11 AIR RELIEF VALVE IN XFS DRIP LINE SECTION 7 L2.50 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7 6-INCH MINIMUM DEPTH OF BRICK (1 OF 2) FILTERED DRAIN VALVE: PVC LATERAL PIPE PVC SCH 40 TEE VALVE BOX WITH COVER: FINISH GRADE/TOP OF MULCH 3/4-INCH WASHED GRAVEL DRAIN VALVE SECTION 6 L2.50 FINISH GRADE CONTROL WIRE WITH IDENTIFICATION TAG NDS VALVE BOX WITH LOCKING COVER 90° ELL-PVC SCHEDULE 40 SCHEDULE 80 PVC NIPPLE MAIN LINE FITTING MAIN SUPPLY LINE 6" GRAVEL SUMP LINE BOTTOM OF VALVE PIT WITH LANDSCAPE FABRIC. MAINTAIN CLEAR SPACE BETWEEN BOTTOM OF VALVE PIT AND VALVE. DO NOT ALLOW BOX TO REST ON PIPE. TO SPRINKLERS TYPICAL CONTROL VALVE SECTION NTSL2.50 5 ALL DRIPLINE TUBING AND FITTING CONNECTIONS SHALL BE CLAMPED PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS DRIPLINE NOTE: 1. DRIP TUBING TO BE ROUTED IN THE PLANT MATERIAL BED WITH AT MAXIMUM LATERAL SPACING OF 16 INCHES. 2. DRIP TUBING TO BE INSTALLED IN A GRID PATTERN. DRIP TUBING SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN A LONG CONTINUOUS RUN. 3.CONTRACTOR TO REFER TO IRRIGATION PLAN FOR LOCATION OF CONTROL VALVES THAT UTILIZE MULTIPLE DRIPLINE SUPPLY CONNECTIONS (IF SHOWN). CONTRACTOR TO REFER TO IRRIGATION PLAN FOR LOCATION OF CONTROL VALVES THAT UTILIZE MULTIPLE DRIPLINE SUPPLY CONNECTIONS. IF NOT SHOWN, INSTALL WITHIN ADJACENT GREEN AREA NOT IN A HIGHLY VISIBLE AREA. WHEN DRIPLINE REQUIRES MULTIPLE SUPPLY POINTS EACH POINT SHALL BE CONNECTED UTILIZING RAINBIRD FITTINGS. TO NEXT DRIP SUPPLY POINT WHERE APPLICABLEFROM CONTROL VALVE DRIPLINE TEE AREA PERIMETER AREA PERIMETER TYPICAL DRIP LINE PLAN NTSL2.50 9 3' MIN. 3' MIN. IRRIGATION SLEEVE ROADWAY/DRIVEWAY BASE + SHARED SLEEVE, WHERE APPLICABLE WITH LATERALS & MAINLINE ONLY. ALL WIRING IS SEPARATE CONDUIT. CONCRETE CURB WHERE APPLICABLE TURF/PLANTING BED END OF SLEEVE END OF SLEEVE METALLIC DISC METALLIC DISC TURF/PLANTING BED TYPICAL SLEEVING SECTION NTS 10 L2.50 12" MIN 10' 12" MIN 18" MIN 18" MIN 12" MIN 12" MIN ALL 120 VOLT WIRING IN CONDUIT TO BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL CODE. ALL PLASTIC PIPING TO BE SNAKED IN TRENCHES AS SHOWN. TAPE AND BUNDLE WIRING AT 10 FT. INTERVALS ALL MAIN LINES TO BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS. 120 VOLT IN CONDUIT WIRING MAIN SUPPLY LATERAL MAIN SUPPLY, LATERAL, AND WIRING MAINLINE WIRING LATERAL METAL DETECTABLE MARKING TAPE TYPICAL TRENCHING SECTION / PLAN NTSL2.50 11 COMMERCIAL CONTROL DRIP ZONE VALVE KIT SECTION / PLAN NTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 654321 7 3 14 15 8 9 8 10 11 1312 14 FINISH GRADE/TOP OF MULCH VALVE BOX WITH COVER: REMOTE CONTROL VALVE: ID TAG WATERPROOF CONNECTION: 30-INCH LINEAR LENGTH OF WIRE, COILED PRESSURE REGULATING QUICK CHECK BASKET FILTER: PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE (LENGTH AS REQUIRED) PVC SCH 40 ELL PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE (2-INCH LENGTH, HIDDEN) AND PVC SCH 40 ELL PVC SCH 40 TEE OR ELL MAINLINE PIPE 3-INCH MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3/4-INCH WASHED GRAVEL PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE, CLOSE PVC SCH 40 TEE PVC SCH 40 ELL PVC SCH 40 FEMALE ADAPTOR LATERAL PIPE 15 16 17 18 17 16 7214 16 714 SIDE VIEW TOP VIEW L2.50 1 IRRIGATION CONTROLLER: CONTROLLER (OWNER TO SPECIFY WALL MOUNT OR STAINLESS STEEL PEDESTAL MOUNT). INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. JUNCTION BOX 1-INCH CONDUIT AND FITTINGS TO POWER SUPPLY POWER SUPPLY WIRE 2-INCH CONDUIT AND FITTINGS FOR STATION WIRES WIRES TO REMOTE CONTROL VALVES NOTES: 1.FOR EASE OF INSTALLATION INTO A CONTROLLER WITH MORE THAN 24 STATIONS, INSTALL A JUNCTION BOX AT THE BASE OF CONTROLLER AND TRANSITION LARGER VALVE AND COMMON WIRES FROM FIELD TO 18 AWG MULTI CONDUCTOR WIRE TO BE USED IN CONTROLLER. 2. USE STEEL CONDUIT FOR ABOVE GRADE AND SCH 40 PVC CONDUIT FOR BELOW GRADE CONDITIONS. 3. PROVIDE PROPER GROUNDING COMPONENTS TO ACHIEVE GROUND RESISTANCE OF 10 OHMS OR LESS. 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 TYPICAL CONTROLLER ELEVATION NTS 2 L2.50 1. 2. ALL MAIN LINE TO BE INSTALLED ACCORDING AND TESTED TO MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. ALL TRENCH DEPTHS AND WIDTHS SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE TYPICAL TRENCHING DETAILS. INSTALLATION NOTES: TYPICAL THRUST BLOCK SECTION NTS 3 L2.50 INSTALLATION NOTES 1.3000 PSI CONCRETE OR BETTER IS TO BE USED FOR THRUST BLOCKS. 2.FOR 45°/90° FITTINGS, MINIMUM OF 2 CUBIC FEET OF CONCRETE TO BE USED. 3.FOR 22-1/2° FITTINGS, MINIMUM OF 0.5 CUBIC FEET OF CONCRETE TO BE USED. 4.FOR TEES, MINIMUM OF 2 CUBIC FEET OF CONCRETE TO BE USED. THRUST BLOCKS REQUIRED FOR IRRIGATION MAINLINE 2 1/2" AND LARGER. THRUST BLOCK REINFORCEMENT SECTION NTS 4 L2.50 1332 BY DA T E AS S H O W N RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E SHEET NUMBER CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T DA T E : LI C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L 68 7 6 M A R W I C K L A N E , S U I T E 3 5 0 , O R L A N D O , F L 3 2 8 2 7 PH O N E : ( 4 0 7 ) 5 3 6 - 4 4 4 0 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M R E G I S T R Y N o . 3 5 1 0 6 RE V I S E D P E R C I T Y C O M M E N T S 07 / 1 7 / 2 5 MM B 1 Pl o t t e d B y : Mi a h , I f r i t S h e e t S e t : WI N T E R S P R I N G S M A R K E T P L A C E - A D D I T I O N A L P A R K I N G L a y o u t : L2 . 5 1 Ju l y 1 7 , 2 0 2 5 0 3 : 2 4 : 5 7 p m K: \ o r l _ c i v i l \ 1 4 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 - w i n t e r s p r i n g s w a w a \ C A D D \ C O N S T \ p l a n s h e e t s - a d d p a r k i n g \ L 2 . 0 0 I R R I G A T I O N P L A N . d w g WI N T E R S P R I N G S WA W A IR R I G A T I O N N O T E S FL CI T Y O F W I N T E R S P R I N G S L2.51 14 9 1 7 0 0 2 6 07 / 1 7 / 2 0 2 5 AD L JC B CN S IRRIGATION SYSTEM NOTES: 1.THE IRRIGATION MAINLINE LAYOUT IS DIAGRAMMATIC. ANY CHANGES MADE IN THE IRRIGATION MAINLINE DUE TO FIELD CONDITIONS OR CONTRACTOR'S SUBMITTED DESIGN SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE STANDARDS. 2.SET SPRAY HEADS 6" AND ROTORS 12" IN FROM BACK OF CURB OR 24" IF PAVEMENT HAS NO CURB. 3.IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PERFORMING ALL NECESSARY MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED TO MEET THE SCHEMATIC INTENT OF THESE PLANS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING PROPOSAL. THESE PLANS OUTLINE THE OVERALL LAYOUT THE SYSTEM AND IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO ZONE THE SYSTEM ACCORDINGLY BASED ON FLOW AND PRESSURE AVAILABLE. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE FOLLOWING BUT NOT LIMITED TO AVAILABLE FLOW, AVAILABLE PRESSURE, CONNECTION ASSEMBLY, CAPACITY OF THE SYSTEM. 4.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE NEW AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER FOR PROPOSED SYSTEM (NO BATTERY OPERATED CONTROLLERS ALLOWED). COORDINATE LOCATION WITH OWNER. 5.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AUTOMATIC RAIN SENSOR. COORDINATE LOCATION W/ OWNER. 6.IRRIGATION SHALL NOT BE COMBINED ON A SINGLE ZONE AND SHALL BE ZONED ACCORDING TO IRRIGATION TYPE, PRECIPITATION RATE, AND THE SYSTEM'S AVAILABLE WATER / PRESSURE. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS TO OWNER FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 7.VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM. ALL UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES MAY NOT BE SHOWN ON THESE PLANS-CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY. 8.CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY ALL POINT OF CONNECTION SOURCE INFORMATION INCLUDING PSI AND GPM PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 9.INSTALLATION OF WORK SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH OTHER CONTRACTORS IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO ALLOW FOR A SPEEDY AND ORDERLY COMPLETION OF ALL WORK ON-SITE. 10.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE PLANTING PLAN FOR PLANTER BED AND TREE LOCATIONS TO ENSURE ALL PLANT MATERIAL IS COVERED BY 100% HEAD-TO-HEAD IRRIGATION. 11.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE "AS-BUILT" DRAWINGS OF THE FINAL INSTALLATION TO OWNER AT SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION BEFORE RECEIVING FINAL PAYMENT. 12.PRODUCTS SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED OR APPROVED EQUAL. PRE-APPROVED MANUFACTURERS: 1. TORO 2. HUNTER 3. RAINBIRD 13.IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL SECURE ANY AND ALL NECESSARY PERMITS FOR THE WORK PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF HIS OPERATIONS ON-SITE. COPIES OF THE PERMITS SHALL BE SENT TO THE OWNER/GENERAL CONTRACTOR. WORK IN THE R.O.W. SHALL CONFORM TO THE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF LOCAL AND/OR STATE JURISDICTION. 14.LOCATE ALL IRRIGATION LINES WITHIN LANDSCAPED AREAS WHENEVER POSSIBLE. ALL LINES UNDER PAVEMENT MUST BE SLEEVED WITHIN SCH. 40 PVC 2x SIZE OF PIPE AND FREE OF STONES/DEBRIS. ALL VALVES SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN LANDSCAPED AREAS. 15.MAINLINE SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 16.THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL BE DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR SLEEVING AND DIRECTIONAL BORES. 17.ALL SLEEVES UTILIZED BY THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR WHETHER INSTALLED BY HIM OR NOT, SHALL BE LOCATED ON THE "AS-BUILT" DRAWINGS. THE DEPTH BELOW FINISH GRADE, TO THE NEAREST FOOT OF EACH END OF THE SLEEVE SHALL BE NOTED AT EACH SLEEVE LOCATION ON THE "AS-BUILT" DRAWINGS. ALL SLEEVES ON PLAN FOR WALL PENETRATIONS AND UNDER SIDEWALKS SHALL BE SIZED TWO PIPE SIZES GREATER THAN THE PIPE IT CARRIES. 18.ALL PRESSURIZED MAINLINES AND LATERALS UNDER PAVEMENT SHALL BE WITHIN SCH. 40 PVC SLEEVES. WHERE ELECTRIC OR HYDRAULIC VALVE CONTROL LINES PASS THROUGH A SLEEVE WITH OTHER MAIN OR LATERAL LINES THEY SHALL BE CONTAINED WITHIN A SEPARATE, SMALLER CONDUIT. 19.NUMBER THE TOP OF ALL VALVE BOX LIDS WITH MINIMUM 1" HEIGHT BLACK LETTERS TO CORRESPOND TO AUTOMATIC AND GATE VALVE DESIGNATIONS. ALL HOSE BIBB VALVE BOXES SHALL BE LABELED IN A SIMILAR MANNER WITH THE DESIGNATION "HB". LETTER OUTSIDE OF TIME CLOCK CABINETS TO CORRESPOND WITH IRRIGATION CLOCK PROGRAM DESIGNATION. 20.THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A COLOR CODED METAL DETECTABLE MARKING TAPE WHICH CLEARLY NOTES: "CAUTION: IRRIGATION LINE BURIED BELOW." THE TAPE SHALL BE INSTALLED THE FULL LENGTH OF THE IRRIGATION MAINLINE. 21.ELECTRIC SERVICE TO THE CONTROLLER SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. 22.ALL 24 VAC WIRING FROM DECODER TO VALVE SHALL BE OF DIRECT BURIAL COPPER WIRE. MAXIMUM LENGTH OF WIRE FROM DECODER TO VALVE SHALL NOT EXCEED 400 FEET. AS FOLLOWS: CONTROL WIRES - #14 COMMON WIRES - #14 23.ALL VALVES, SPLICES WITHIN CONTROL LINES, AND QUICK COUPLERS SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN NDS VALVE BOXES AS FOLLOWS: -RECTANGULAR 12"X17" HEAVY DUTY BOX. (PURPLE COVER FOR REUSE TO BE PROVIDED WHERE APPROPRIATE). 24.ALL IRRIGATION HEADS/DRIP TUBING SHALL BE LOCATED ONE (1) FOOT FROM BACK OF CURB WHEN NEXT TO A ROADWAY. (THIS SHALL NOT INCLUDE PARKING AREAS OR DRIVE AISLES). 25.HEADS, LATERALS, EMITTERS, AND VALVES ARE NOT SHOWN, BUT ARE NECESSARY FOR A FULLY FUNCTIONING IRRIGATION SYSTEM. 26.LOCATE ALL VALVES IN PLANTING BEDS WITH A MINIMUM OF 3'-0" FROM BACK OF CURB OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PIPE SIZES ON EITHER SIDE OF SECTION VALVES CONNECTING MAINLINE TO SECTION LATERAL SHALL BE ONE (1) PIPE SIZE LARGER THAN VALVE SIZE. WHERE MAINLINES RUN PARALLEL TO PAVEMENT OR CURBING, THE MAINLINE SHALL BE OFFSET 2'-0" FROM THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT OR CURB. 27.IRRIGATION ZONES SHALL BE SEPARATED FOR HIGH AND LOW WATER USE REQUIREMENTS AND OPERATED ON DIFFERENT WATERING CYCLES. BUBBLERS, DRIPLINE, AND SPRAY HEADS SHALL BE SEPARATED ON DIFFERENT VALVES. AT NO TIME SHALL MULTIPLE IRRIGATION HEAD TYPES BE LOCATED ON THE SAME VALVE. 28.ALL DRIP ZONES SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A FLUSH VALVE AND AIR RELIEF VALVE. IN THE EVENT THAT A DRIP ZONE HAS MORE THAN ONE HIGH OR LOW POINT, MORE THAN ONE AIR RELIEF VALVE OR FLUSH VALVE WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THAT ZONE. DRIPLINE SHALL PROVIDE 0.9 GPH EMITTERS, 12" O.C. WITH 12" LINE SPACING AT A MINIMUM. 29.ALL WIRING FOR CONNECTION OF THE VALVES TO THE CONTROLLER SHALL FOLLOW MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. IF REQUIRED, ALL WIRING FOR A TWO WIRE PATH SHALL BE WITH RED/BLUE TWISTED PAIR 14 AWG. ELECTRIC CONTROL LINES FROM THE DECODER TO THE SOLENOID VALVES SHALL BE TWISTED PAIR 18 AWG. ALL DECODERS SHALL BE GROUNDED EVERY 1,000 L.F. OR EVERY 10 DEVICES. ALL WIRE SHALL BE FURNISHED IN MINIMUM 2,500' REELS AND SPLICING SHALL BE MINIMIZED. BURY SPLICE KIT. ALL 24 VOLT WIRING SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH EXISTING CODES. SPLICING SHALL BE IN VALVE BOXES OR CONTROLLERS ONLY. IRRIGATION SYSTEM CONTROL SHALL BE TWO WIRE PATH. CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW ALL MANUFACTURER'S REQUIREMENTS FOR THIS INSTALLATION. TWO WIRE SYSTEM SHALL HAVE 2-WAY COMMUNICATIONS FIELD PROGRAMMABILITY, STATION SPECIFICATIONS AND INTEGRATED SURGE PROTECTION. 30.ALL CONTROL WIRE SHALL BE INSTALLED IN A 1 1 4" ELECTRICAL CONDUIT. 31.SMALLEST DIAMETER LATERAL PIPE SHALL BE 3/4". 32.IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE CAPABLE OF SUPPLYING AN AVERAGE OF 1.05" OF WATER PER WEEK WITHIN WATERING RESTRICTIONS AS APPLICABLE. 33.IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED THROUGH EXISTING, OR PRESERVED PLANT COMMUNITIES. DO NOT TRENCH THROUGH EXISTING ROOT SYSTEMS OF ANY VEGETATION INTENDED TO BE PRESERVED. 34.CONTRACTOR TO MINIMIZE IRRIGATION OVERTHROW TO IMPERVIOUS AND NATURAL AREAS THROUGH FIELD ADJUSTMENTS TO INDIVIDUAL HEADS. 35.ALL AREAS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED BY THE CONTRACTOR TO THE CONDITION DENOTED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. 36.IRRIGATION PIPING INSTALLED UNDER ROADS AND SIDEWALKS SHALL BE IN SCHEDULE 40 PVC SLEEVING AT 2X THE PIPE SIZE. ALL SLEEVING SHALL BE FREE OF STONES AND DEBRIS. 37.IRRIGATION SOURCE TO BE EITHER WELL, POTABLE, OR NON-POTABLE WATER. IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SOURCE PRIOR TO DESIGN. 38.POINT OF CONNECTION TO BE DETERMINED BY OWNER. IRRIGATION SYSTEM CONNECTIONS TO THE LOCAL JURISDICTION SERVICE SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES. 39.IRRIGATION CONNECTION MAY REQUIRE BACKFLOW PREVENTION, VERIFY WITH LOCAL JURISDICTION. 40.IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LOCAL JURISDICTION LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. TYPICAL SCHEMATIC IRRIGATION NOTES1 L2.51 1333 kimley-horn.com 1530 Cornerstone Boulevard, Suite 200, Daytona Beach, FL, 32117 386 271 0282 MEMORANDUM To: Terrilyn Rolle, MPA, AICP Director of Community Development, Winter Springs From: Emanuelle D Rodríguez Muñiz, P.E., IMSA1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Date: December 6, 2024 Subject: Wawa Winter Springs Parking Demand Study Introduction Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. has undertaken the following review and analysis to evaluate the anticipated parking needs for the proposed Wawa convenience store/gas station to be located south of SR 434 and west of Tuskawilla Road in the City of Winter Springs, Florida. The site is zoned as (T -C) Town Center District. As stated in Section 20-324 of the City's Land Development Code (LDC), there are no minimum parking requirements for T-C; instead, a parking analysis shall be performed justifying the proposed parking solution. This study provides a comparison between the City's code-required parking for the most similar land use, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Parking Generation Manual 6th Edition, and Urban Land Institute (ULI) Shared Parking 3rd Edition. The study also includes the required bicycle parking for the site based on the Association of Pedestrian and Bicyclist Professionals (APBP). The proposed Wawa development will consist of the following uses, as shown in the site plan provided in Attachment A: • 4,736 square feet of convenience store • 12 vehicle fueling positions (VFP) Code Parking Requirements Section 9-277 of the City's LDC defines the off-street parking requirements for specific land uses. The LDC does not have a specific land use for convenience store/gas station therefore “General business and retail commercial” was reviewed: • General business and retail commercial. One (1) parking space for each three hundred (300) square feet of floor space in the building exclusive of storage space. Emanuelle D Rodriguez Digitally signed by Emanuelle D Rodriguez DN: CN=Emanuelle D Rodriguez, dnQualifier=A01410C00000193411684510002EF49, O=KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC, C=US Date: 2024.12.06 10:35:24-05'00' 1334 Wawa Winter Springs – Parking Demand Study, Page 2 kimley-horn.com 1530 Cornerstone Boulevard, Suite 200, Daytona Beach, FL, 32117 386 271 0282 As shown in Table 1, a total parking supply of 16 spaces (rounded to nearest integer) at a parking ratio of 3.38 spaces per a thousand square feet would potentially be required depending on interpretation of the City’s LDC. Table 1: City Code Parking Requirement City LDC Proposed Development Required Parking Land Use Min. Requirement Size Units General business and retail commercial 1 space per 300 SF 4,736 SF 16 ITE's Parking Generation Manual, 6th Edition Evaluation A calculation of the anticipated parking demand was undertaken using data published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Parking Generation Manual 6th Edition. Empirical data collected on sites throughout the country are compiled to develop parking demand ratios for similar land uses. The 85th percentile peak parking demand was utilized in accordance with industry-accepted standards. As shown in Table 2, a total parking supply of 50 spaces (rounded to nearest integer) at a parking ratio of 10.56 spaces per a thousand square feet would be needed to serve the proposed convenience store/gas station as an isolated and stand-alone establishment. Table 2: ITE Parking Demand Summary ITE ParkGen Proposed Development Required Parking Land Use LUC 85th Percentile Size Units Convenience Store/Gas Station 945 10.65 per KSF 4.736 KSF 50 ULI Shared Parking, 3rd Edition Evaluation Parking within mixed-use developments means patrons can “park once” though are able to visit multiple establishments essentially reducing overall parking demand. The Urban Land Institute (ULI) Shared Parking 3rd Edition provides a methodology to calculate the parking demand reduction based on the mix of land uses. The proposed Wawa is within a mixed-use development as shown in Table 3. Properties were identified through a desktop search as well as using data from the Seminole County Property Appraiser. Building configuration of the development is shown as Attachment C. Table 3: ULI Land Uses by Existing Tenants Bldg. Existing Tenant ULI Land Use Sq. Ft. A Lake Jesup Dental Care Medical/Dental Office 4,280 B Chipotle Fast Casual/Fast Food 2,325 C Fifth Third Bank Bank (Drive In Branch) 2,065 D Crunch Fitness Health Club 19,200 E Dollar Tree Discount Stores/Superstores 10,000 F Aldi Supermarket/Grocery 19,209 G Wawa Retail (over 2KSF) 4,736 Total 61,815 1335 Wawa Winter Springs – Parking Demand Study, Page 3 kimley-horn.com 1530 Cornerstone Boulevard, Suite 200, Daytona Beach, FL, 32117 386 271 0282 The ULI Shared Parking provides monthly adjustment factors and weekend time-of-day adjustment factors, which show the peak season and peak time-of-day, respectively. The parking ratio applied is the highest demand period which potentially generates demand for 311 spaces (rounded to the nearest integer). The results of ULI’s Shared Parking analysis are shown in Attachment D. As shown in Table 4, the mixed-use development without Wawa currently provides 344 parking spaces. ULI estimates even including Wawa’s parking demand, 307 spaces would be sufficient. Therefore, a 33- parking space surplus exists prior to adding parking by Wawa. Table 4: Parking Ratio Determination ULI Peak Demand Estimate Existing Spaces Surplus/Deficit 311 344 +33 Bicycle Parking According to the Association of Pedestrian and Bicyclist Professionals (APBP), bicycle parking can be measured by commercial activity including retail. Long-term bicycle parking is considered utilized by employees demanding less spaces per square foot. Short-term bicycle parking is considered utilized by patrons who routinely generate demand and require more spaces per square foot. Therefore, the short- term bicycle parking recommendation of 2 spaces is applied to the Wawa as shown in Table 5: Table 5: Bicycle Parking Spaces Summary Commercial Activity Long-Term Bicycle Parking Requirement Short-Term Bicycle Parking Requirement General Retail 1 space for each 12,000 sf of floor area. Minimum requirement is 2 spaces 1 space for each 5,000 sf of floor area. Minimum requirement is 2 spaces Conclusion Upon review of the ITE parking ratio for a stand-alone convenience store/gas station, 10.65 spaces per KSF could be recommended. However, Wawa is within a mixed-use development which ULI measures would have shared parking capacity. The mixed-use development including the Wawa would generate demand for a total of 311 spaces. The mixed-use development currently supplies 344 parking spaces which does not reflect potential future parking from Wawa. Therefore, the existing 344 spaces is considered sufficient to address both the mixed-use development and Wawa’s peak parking demand. Additional parking by Wawa will only serve to increase the existing 33 space surplus. Additionally, it is recommended that 2 bicycle parking spaces be provided at the Wawa location based on the Association of Pedestrian and Bicyclist Professionals (APBP) guidelines. 1336 ATTACHMENT A Site Plan 1337 1338 ATTACHMENT B ITE Parking Generation Manual 1339 733 Land Use: 945 Convenience Store/Gas Station Description A convenience store/gas station is a facility with a co-located convenience store and gas station. The convenience store sells grocery and other everyday items that a person may need or want as a matter of convenience. The gas station sells automotive fuels such as gasoline and diesel. The sites in this land use include both self-pump and attendant-pumped fueling positions and both pre-pay and post-pay operations. A convenience store/gas station is typically located along a major thoroughfare to optimize motorist convenience. Extended hours of operation (with many open 24 hours, 7 days a week) are common at these facilities. The convenience store product mix typically includes pre-packaged grocery items, beverages, dairy products, snack foods, confectionary, tobacco products, over-the-counter drugs, and toiletries. A convenience store may sell alcohol, often limited to beer and wine. Coffee and premade sandwiches are also commonly sold. Made-to-order food orders are sometimes offered. Some stores offer limited seating. Convenience Store (Land Use 851) is a related use. Land Use Descriptions and Data Plots 1340 734 Parking Generation Manual, 6th Edition Time-of-Day Distribution for Parking Demand The following table presents a time-of-day distribution of parking demand on a weekday at five study sites in a general urban/suburban setting. Hour Beginning Percent of Weekday Peak Parking Demand 12:00–4:00 a.m. - 5:00 a.m.- 6:00 a.m.- 7:00 a.m.54 8:00 a.m.73 9:00 a.m.65 10:00 a.m.72 11:00 a.m.80 12:00 p.m.100 1:00 p.m.89 2:00 p.m.69 3:00 p.m.63 4:00 p.m.54 5:00 p.m.54 6:00 p.m.49 7:00 p.m.- 8:00 p.m.- 9:00 p.m.- 10:00 p.m.- 11:00 p.m.- 1341 735 Additional Data The reported parking demand does not include any vehicles parked at fueling pump spaces even though some motorists may leave their vehicle at the fueling pump while inside the convenience store. The average parking supply ratio for the 15 study sites in a general urban/suburban setting with parking supply information is 12 spaces per 1,000 square feet GFA. The average peak parking occupancy at these sites is 69 percent. The sites were surveyed in the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 2020s in California, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Virginia. Source Numbers 417, 433, 443, 444, 626, 637 Land Use Descriptions and Data Plots 1342 736 Parking Generation Manual, 6th Edition Convenience Store/Gas Station(945) Peak Period Parking Demand vs:1000 Sq.Ft.GFA On a:Weekday (Monday -Friday) Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies:14 Avg.1000 Sq.Ft.GFA:5.5 Peak Period Parking Demand per 1000 Sq.Ft.GFA Average Rate Range of Rates 33rd /85th Percentile 95%Confidence Interval Standard Deviation (Coeff.of Variation) 8.21 5.66 -11.67 7.80 /10.65 ***1.71 (21%) Data Plot and Equation 0 2 4 6 80 20 40 60 80 Average RateStudySite Fitted Curve Equation:***R²=*** X =1000 Sq.Ft.GFA P = P a r k e d V e h i c l e s 1343 ATTACHMENT C Mixed-Use Development Layout 1344 A B C D E F G 1345 ATTACHMENT D ULI Shared Parking Results 1346 Copyright © 2020 All rights reserved. The Urban Land Institute, International Council of Shopping Centers, and National Parking Association. Project:Winter Spring Description:Wawa Quantity Unit 5 PM December 5 PM December Retail (over 2,000 ksf)4,736 sf GLA 2.90 100% 100% 2.89 ksf GLA 3.20 100% 100% 3.20 ksf GLA 85% 100% 12 80% 100% 13 Employee 0.70 99% 100% 0.69 0.80 99% 100% 0.79 100% 100% 4 55% 100% 2 Supermarket/Grocery 19,209 sf GLA 4.00 100% 100% 3.99 ksf GLA 4.00 100% 100% 3.99 ksf GLA 100% 100% 77 90% 100% 69 Employee 0.75 99% 100% 0.74 0.75 99% 100% 0.74 100% 100% 15 55% 100% 8 Discount Stores/Superstores 10,000 sf GLA 3.40 100% 100% 3.39 ksf GLA 3.80 100% 100% 3.80 ksf GLA 85% 100% 29 95% 100% 36 Employee 0.85 99% 100% 0.84 0.95 99% 100% 0.94 95% 100% 8 100% 100% 10 Fast Casual/Fast Food 2,325 sf GLA 12.40 100% 50% 6.16 ksf GLA 12.70 100% 57% 7.26 ksf GLA 60% 96% 10 60% 96% 13 Employee 2.00 99% 100% 1.98 2.00 99% 100% 1.98 70% 100% 3 70% 100% 3 Health Club 19,200 sf GLA 6.60 100% 99% 6.54 ksf GLA 5.50 100% 99% 5.47 ksf GLA 90% 100% 114 100% 100% 106 Employee 0.40 99% 100% 0.40 0.25 99% 100% 0.25 100% 100% 8 100% 100% 5 Medical/Dental Office 4,280 sf GFA 3.00 100% 100% 2.99 ksf GFA 0.00 100% 100% 0.00 ksf GFA 80% 100% 10 0% 100% - Employee 1.60 100% 100% 1.60 0.00 100% 100% 0.00 100% 100% 7 0% 100% - Bank (Drive In Branch)2,065 sf GFA 3.50 100% 95% 3.34 ksf GFA 3.00 100% 100% 3.00 ksf GFA 100% 100% 8 0% 100% - Employee 2.50 100% 100% 2.50 1.75 100% 100% 1.75 100% 100% 6 0% 100% - 260 237 51 28 - - 311 265 13% 16% Additional Land Uses Shared Parking Reduction Total Reserved Employee/Resident Customer/VisitorCustomer/Visitor Employee/Resident Total Reserved Office Base Ratio Unit For Ratio Estimated Parking Demand Retail Non- Captive Ratio Project Ratio Non- Captive Ratio Project Ratio Driving Adj Entertainment and Institutions Hotel and Residential Food and Beverage Base Ratio Driving Adj Peak Hr Adj Weekend Shared Parking Demand Summary Peak Month: DECEMBER -- Peak Period: 5 PM, WEEKDAY WeekdayWeekendWeekday Project DataLand Use Peak Mo AdjUnit For Ratio Estimated Parking Demand Peak Hr Adj Peak Mo Adj 13 4 7 2815 Directors Row, Suite 500, Orlando, FL 32809 • T: 407-859-8378 • F: 407-859-9599 • www.ecslimited.com ECS Carolinas, LLP • ECS Florida, LLC • ECS Midwest, LLC • ECS Mid-Atlantic, LLC • ECS Southeast, LLC • ECS Texas, LLP August 4, 2020 Ms. Kirsten Davis Equinox Development 630 S. Maitland Avenue Suite 100 Maitland, Florida 32751 ECS Project No. 55:3210 SUBJECT: Listed Wildlife Species Survey ± 10.25 - Acre Winter Springs Property Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida Dear Ms. Davis: As requested, ECS Florida, LLC (ECS) is pleased to present the following Listed Wildlife Species Survey for the ± 10.25 - Acre Winter Springs Property located in Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida. Work was provided by our sub-consultant, Thomson Environmental Consulting (Thomson). We have attached Thomson’s report. Thank you for this opportunity to offer our services. Please call the undersigned with questions or comments at (407) 859-8378. Respectfully submitted, ECS FLORIDA, LLC Ivona Minossora Environmental Group Manager James (Cliff) Hendrickson, P.G. Florida Professional Geologist 2226 Environmental Principal Attachment: Thomson’s Listed Wildlife Species Survey 1348 2324 Leu Road ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32803 407.374.3681 tel 407.405.8725 cell Page 1 of 5 October 22, 2018 Ivona Minossora ECS Florida, LLC 2815 Directors Row, Suite 500 Orlando, Florida 32809 RE: Listed Wildlife Species Survey ±10.25-Acre Winter Springs Property Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida Thomson Project No. 18-650 Ms. Minossora: Thomson Environmental Consulting, LLC (Thomson) completed a Listed Wildlife Species Survey of the ±10.25-Acre Winter Springs Property (the property) generally located in the southwest corner of the intersection of State Road 434 and Tuskawilla Road. The field portion of the survey was conducted on October 9, 2018. The purpose of the field visit was to evaluate the subject property for the occurrence and/or potential for occurrence of protected wildlife species (and their habitat). The following report (and referenced exhibits) describes relevant ecological conditions observed on the site during the field investigation and the results of documented literature regarding the presence of protected wildlife species and/or habit on the site and its relevant surroundings. SITE DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION The property is generally located in the southwest corner of the intersection of State Road 434 and Tuskawilla Road in Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida. The property measures ±10.25 acres using the Seminole County Geographic Information System (GIS) coverages, but only ±9.9 acres according to the Seminole County Property Appraiser (SCPA). Per the SCPA, the property comprises 4 legal parcels identified as follows: SCPA PID 36-20-30-502-0000-0070 (±2.82 acres) SCPA PID 36-20-30-502-0000-0080 (±3.03 acres) SCPA PID 26-20-30-5AR-0A00-008F (±0.26 acre) SCPA PID 36-20-30-502-0000-0090 (±3.79 acres) 1349 2324 Leu Road ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32803 407.374.3681 tel 407.405.8725 cell Page 2 of 5 Figure 1 is a location map showing the entirety of the property, including internal named streets. Figure 2 is a true-color rectified aerial (circa 2017) of the property and its immediate surroundings. Figure 3 is a topographic quadrangle map showing the topographic relief on the property and in the local region surrounding the site. SOILS Soils were identified using the Natural Resource Conservation Service’s Soil Survey of Seminole County, Florida. The following soil units and descriptions were mapped by the soil survey on the property: Myakka and EauGallie Fine Sands (Map Unit 20) – This soil represented approximately 2.66 acres of the property. The soils in this map unit are nearly level and poorly drained. These soils are on broad plains on the flatwoods. The slopes are dominantly less than 2 percent. During most years, the soils in this map unit have a seasonal high water table within 12 inches of the surface for 1 month to 4 months. The permeability of Myakka soil is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers and substratum and moderate or moderately rapid in the subsoil. The permeability of EauGallie soil is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers, moderate or moderately rapid in the sandy part of the subsoil, and moderately slow in the loamy part of the subsoil. Paola-St. Lucie Sands, 0 to 5 percent slopes (Map Unit 24) – This soil represented approximately 6.33 acres of the property. The soils in this map unit are nearly level to gently sloping and excessively drained. These soils are on upland ridges. The slopes are 0 to 5 percent. The soils in this map unit have a seasonal high water table at a depth of 80 inches or more. Tavares-Millhopper Fine Sands, 0 to 5 percent slopes (Map Unit 31) – This soil represented approximately 1.26 acres of the property. The soils in this map unit are nearly level to gently sloping and moderately well drained. These soils are on low ridges and knolls on the uplands. The slopes are nearly smooth to slightly convex. The soils in this map unit have a seasonal high water table at a depth of 36 to 60 inches for 2 to 6 months. Figure 4 shows the property and soils as mapped by the Soil Survey. Soils observed during the site visit seemed to generally match those as described in the Soil Survey. No indications of hydric soils were observed. 1350 2324 Leu Road ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32803 407.374.3681 tel 407.405.8725 cell Page 3 of 5 VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES AND LAND USES Prior to the field visit, Geographic Information System (GIS) data from the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) was reviewed to identify documented vegetative communities and land uses on the property. These site conditions are documented using the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCCS, Florida Department of Transportation, 1999). FLUCCS classifications for the land covers and uses (as adapted from SJRWMD coverages) on the property are as follows: Commercial and Services - Abandoned (FLUCFCS code 0140) – This classification represented approximately 1.24 acres of the property. It is the eastern portion of the property that was formerly a Pinch a Penny pool supply store accessible from both Tuskawilla Road and SR 434. Hardwood-Conifer Mixed (FLUCFCS code 434) – This classification represented approximately 9.01 acres and the majority of the property. This upland, undeveloped area was dominated by slash and sand pine, with a dense subcanopy of xeric oaks in the central portion of the property. Figure 5 is a FLUCFCS map that depicts the land cover classification described above. PROTECTED WILDLIFE SPECIES SURVEY Protected wildlife species are defined as those listed as Threatened, Endangered, or Species of Special Concern by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/or the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). The survey consisted of both a search of documented literature and a field reconnaissance. Documented Literature Search Prior to the field investigation, documented literature resources were consulted regarding known occurrences of protected wildlife species on or in the vicinity of the project site. These included the FWC’s Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) Nest Locator (https://public.myfwc.com/FWRI/EagleNests/nestlocator.aspx) and Waterbird Colony Locator (http://atoll.floridamarine.org/waterBirds/) online locator sites. A query of both databases (from the center of the site extending outward a radius of one mile) revealed no documented occurrences of waterbird colonies within 1 mile of the property. The closest documented bald eagle nest (Nest ID SE087) was documented approximately 2,250 feet east of the property, which is well outside of any applicable buffer zones. 1351 2324 Leu Road ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32803 407.374.3681 tel 407.405.8725 cell Page 4 of 5 The NRCS Web Soil Survey (https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx) was used to identify soils suitable for the burrowing needs of gopher tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus, state-Threatened). The areas identified as Paola-St. Lucie Sands and Tavares-Millhopper Complex were rated as “Highly Suited” soils for gopher tortoises, while the area identified as Myakka and EauGallie Fine Sands are rated as “Less Suited”. The property was mapped within the USFWS Consultation Area for the following federally -listed species: Audubon’s Crested Caracara (Polyborus plancus audubonii, Threatened), Red-Cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis, Endangered), Florida Scrub-Jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens, Threatened), the Everglades Snail Kite (Rostrhamus sociabilis plumbeus, Endangered), and the Florida Wood Stork (Mycteria americana, Endangered). Field Reconnaissance and Observations A protected wildlife species survey and habitat assessment was conducted over the entire property on October 9, 2018. Protected wildlife species are defined as those listed as Threatened, Endangered, or Species of Special Concern by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/or the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). No indication of bald eagle foraging was observed. No nests or juveniles were observed on the property. A survey for gopher tortoises and/or occupied habitat was conducted over 100% of the suitable soils on the property by Mr. Joel Thomson of Thomson Environmental Consulting, LLC (an Authori zed Agent for surveying by FWC). The results of the survey yielded no potentially-occupied gopher tortoise burrows, and no indication of gopher tortoise presence. Based on the quality of habitat, it is recommended that an additional survey of the property be performed within 90 days of intended construction, per the FWC ’s guidelines. The presence of some scrub oaks on the property often represents potential habitat for the Florida Scrub-Jay. The habitat was determined to be too overgrown to represent viable habitat, likely the result of fire exclusion and other factors related to the surrounding development. No indications of Florida Scrub-Jays was observed during the survey. No other protected wildlife species concerns were observed during the course of the field survey. The numerous species with Consultation Areas covering the property have unique, individualized habitat needs that are not offered on the property due to developed nature of much of the property and the lack of natural habitat. 1352 2324 Leu Road ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32803 407.374.3681 tel 407.405.8725 cell Page 5 of 5 LIMITATIONS OF THIS REPORT It is important to note that the conclusions of this repo rt are necessarily based on the conditions observed on the day of the field investigation, as well as our scientific judgment of the site’s potential to support protected species (based on each species’ optimal habitat requirements). Due to this “snapshot” view of the site, the results presented in this report may not accurately reflect changing site conditions and/or wildlife species’ temporal and spatial movements. Thomson appreciates the opportunity to provide these services to you. If there are questions regarding this report, or a need for further information, please contact the undersigned at your convenience. Respectfully, Thomson Environmental Consulting, LLC Joel A. Thomson President 1353 General Location Figure 1 L o c a t i o n M a p kj ¢ TEL 407.405.8725 FAX 407.792.5692 3428 PELICAN LANE ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32803 WWW.THOMSONENV.COM 0 1,000500 1" = 1,000' SeminoleCounty Winter Springs Property Section 1, Township 21 S, Range 30 E and Section 6, Township 21 S, Range 31 E Thomson Project No. 18-650October 2018 Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida Property Boundary Basemap LayerStreetMaps USA courtesy of ESRIProperty BoundaryAdapted from data courtesy of the Seminole County Property Appraiser 1354 General Location Figure 2 A e r i a l P h o t o g r a ph kj ¢ TEL 407.405.8725 FAX 407.792.5692 3428 PELICAN LANE ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32803 WWW.THOMSONENV.COM 0 15075 1" = 150' SeminoleCounty Winter Springs Property Section 1, Township 21 S, Range 30 E and Section 6, Township 21 S, Range 31 E Thomson Project No. 18-650October 2018 Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida Property Boundary Aerial PhotographNatural Color Digital Orthophotoquad (DOQ) Courtesy of the Florida Department of Transportation's (FDOT) Aerial Photo LookupSystem (APLUS); Fly Date circa 2017Property BoundaryAdapted from data courtesy of the Seminole County Property Appraiser 1355 General Location Figure 3 T o p o g r a p h i c M a p kj ¢ TEL 407.405.8725 FAX 407.792.5692 3428 PELICAN LANE ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32803 WWW.THOMSONENV.COM 0 1,000500 1" = 1,000' SeminoleCounty Winter Springs Property Section 1, Township 21 S, Range 30 E and Section 6, Township 21 S, Range 31 E Thomson Project No. 18-650October 2018 Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida Project Boundar y Topographic MapUSGS 7.5-minute series quad map "Casselberry, FL" courtesy of the Flor ida Land andBoundary Information System (LABINS)Property BoundaryAdapted from data courtesy of the Seminole County Property Appraiser 1356 General Location Figure 4 S o i ls M a p kj ¢ TEL 407.405.8725 FAX 407.792.5692 3428 PELICAN LANE O RLANDO, FLORIDA 32 803 WWW.THOMSONENV.COM 0 15075 1" = 150' 24 20 31 31 SeminoleCounty Winter Springs Property Section 1, Township 21 S, Range 30 E and Section 6, Township 21 S, Range 31 E Thomson Project No. 18-650October 2018 Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida Property Boundary Soil Map Unit Soil Map Unit Soil Classificatio n202431 Myakka a nd EauGa llie Fin e SandsPaola-St. Lucie San d, 0 to 5 % Slope sTavares-Millho pper Fin e Sand, 0 to 5% Slo pes Aerial PhotographNatural Color Digital Orthophotoquad (DOQ) Courtesy of the Florida Department of Transportation's (FDOT) AerialPhoto Lookup System (APLUS); Fly Date circa 2017Property BoundaryAdapted from data courtesy of the Seminole County Property AppraiserSoil Map DataObtained from Florida Geographic Data Library (FGDL) as adapted from the Natural Resource ConservationService's Soil Survey of Seminole County, FloridaHydric (%)Based on drainage characteristics and potential mapped inclusions of other soil types from Hydric Soils of FloridaHandbook, 3 rd Edition, where 100 denotes an area that is always hydric and 0 denotes an area that is always non-hydric (i.e. upland) Hydric (%) No (30)NoNo Acre age 2.6 66.3 31.2 6 1357 General Location 0 15075 1" = 150' kj ¢ TEL 407.405.8725 FAX 407.792.5692 3428 PELICAN LANE ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32803 WWW.THOMSONENV.COM Figure 5 FLUCCS Map 434 0140 SeminoleCounty Winter Springs Property Section 1, Township 21 S, Range 30 E and Section 6, Township 21 S, Range 31 E Thomson Project No. 18-650October 2018 Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida 434 Project Boundary FLUCCS Boundaries FLUCFC SCode FLUCC S C lassification 0140434 Comm ercial and Services (Abandoned)Hard wood-Conifer M ixed Aerial PhotographNatural Color Digital Orthophotoquad (DOQ) Courtesy of the Florida Department of Transportation's (FDOT) Aerial PhotoLookup System (APLUS); Fly Date circa 2017Property BoundaryAdapted from data courtesy of the Seminole County Property AppraiserFLUCFCS DataFlorida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCCS, FDOT, 1999) data obtained through fieldreconnaissance by Thomson Environmental Consulting, LLC Acres 1.249.01 1358 ECS Florida, LLC Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Tuskawilla Retail Development 170 Tuskawilla Road Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida ECS Project Number 24:6366 November 15, 2018 Revised December 15, 2020 1359 1360 Tuskawilla Retail Development Revised December 15, 2020 ECS Project No. 24:6366 Page 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................... 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 General ................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Scope of Services .................................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Authorization .......................................................................................................................... 6 2.0 PROJECT INFORMATION ....................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Project Location...................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Past Site History/Uses ............................................................................................................ 7 2.3 Current Site Conditions .......................................................................................................... 7 2.4 Proposed Construction ........................................................................................................... 7 3.0 FIELD EXPLORATION ............................................................................................................. 9 3.1 Field Exploration Program ...................................................................................................... 9 3.1.1 Test Borings .................................................................................................................. 9 3.2 Regional/Site Geology .......................................................................................................... 10 3.3 Karst Geology ....................................................................................................................... 10 3.4 Soil Survey Mapping ............................................................................................................. 11 3.5 Subsurface Characterization ................................................................................................ 12 3.6 Groundwater Observations .................................................................................................. 13 4.0 LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM ...................................................................................... 15 4.1 Visual Classification .............................................................................................................. 15 4.2 Index Testing ........................................................................................................................ 15 5.0 DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................ 16 5.1 Building Design ..................................................................................................................... 16 5.2 Foundations .......................................................................................................................... 16 5.3 Stormwater Management System Design Parameters ........................................................ 17 5.4 Pavement Design Considerations ......................................................................................... 19 6.0 SITE CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................ 21 6.1 Subgrade Preparation .......................................................................................................... 21 6.1.1 Stripping and Subgrade Preparation .......................................................................... 21 6.1.2 Proofrolling ................................................................................................................. 21 6.2 Earthwork Operations .......................................................................................................... 22 6.2.1 Structural Fill Materials............................................................................................... 22 6.3 Utility Installations ............................................................................................................... 23 6.4 General Construction Considerations .................................................................................. 24 6.5 Construction Observation and Testing ................................................................................. 24 7.0 CLOSING ............................................................................................................................. 25 1361 Tuskawilla Retail Development Revised December 15, 2020 ECS Project No. 24:6366 Page 2 APPENDICES Appendix A – Diagrams • Site Location Diagram • Boring Location Diagram Appendix B – Field Operations • Reference Notes for Boring Logs • Boring Logs (B-1 through B-19) • Cross Section A-A’ • Cross Section B-B’ • Cross Section C-C’ Appendix C – Laboratory Testing • Laboratory Testing Results Summary 1362 Tuskawilla Retail Development Revised December 15, 2020 ECS Project No. 24:6366 Page 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The following paragraphs provide a brief discussion of our findings and recommendations. Please refer to the complete report for more detailed discussion. ECS Florida, LLC (ECS) has completed the subsurface exploration for the proposed Tuskawilla Retail Development (approximately 9.95 acres in size) located at 170 Tuskawilla Road in Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida. The project information summarized below is based exclusively on the information made available to us by your group at the time of this report. Our findings, conclusions and recommendations are summarized below. PROJECT INFORMATION: • Site Location : 170 Tuskawilla Road in Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida • Building Scope: Four (4) one-story retail structures & two (2) out parcel buildings • Building Type: Concrete Masonry Unit (CMU) and steel framed structures. • Assumed Loads: Max. Column loads = 80 kips, Max. wall loads = 5 klf • Earthwork: Estimated fills of up to 3 feet and cuts up to 10 feet (pond area) • SWM Facility: Two (2) dry ponds, one (1) wet pond and five (5) exfiltration systems SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS: • Field Exploration: 19 SPT borings drilled within the subject property limits to the depths ranging between 10 feet and 20 feet below the existing ground surface. • Site Conditions: Heavily wooded except in the north eastern corner of the property, where there is an existing structure with associated parking area. • Probable Fill: Not encountered • Natural Soils: SAND (SP), and SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM) • Refusal Materials: Not encountered within the depths of borings • Groundwater: Encountered between 3.5 feet and 5.5 feet below the ground surface at the boring locations, seasonal high water table is anticipated to be between 2.5 feet and 5 feet below the existing grades. GEOTECHNICAL & CONSTRUCTABILITY CONSIDERATIONS • Wet fill soils: We anticipate soils excavated from the proposed pond area will be used for structural fill across the site for grading purposes. Due to a higher groundwater table, soils anticipated to be used as structural fill are expected to be wet. Wet soils will require a drying period prior to being compacted for structural fill. Due to the granular nature of the material encountered; however, we anticipate that the soils should dry relatively quickly if spread during hot/dry conditions. • High groundwater table: High groundwater was observed across the site and will need to be considered with respect to the dewatering of utility excavations. 1363 Tuskawilla Retail Development Revised December 15, 2020 ECS Project No. 24:6366 Page 4 • Existing Structure: An existing structure was noted within the eastern portion of the site. The existing structure and its associated subsurface foundations and utilities should be removed prior to the placement of structural fill or foundations for the proposed building areas. PRELIMINARY DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS: • Shallow foundations: Max. Net Allow. Bearing Pressure = 3,000 psf Min. Exterior (Unheated) Embedment = 18 inches Min. Interior (Heated) Embedment = Minimum 24 inches Slab Subgrade Modulus: = 100 pci Based on the information provided to us, it should be noted that the recommendations made in our report are preliminary in nature. Therefore, a final geotechnical exploration report meeting regulatory standards may be necessary in future for final design recommendations. The recommendations made in our report are based on the loading assumptions noted above. A final site development plan has not been provided to us. Once the final site plan is developed along with the proposed grading information, we recommend that our office be contacted to review these items and propose a final geotechnical scope of exploration. Final recommendations regarding the bearing capacity, settlements, and foundation design must be made after completion of a final geotechnical exploration program. This summary should not be considered apart from the entire text of the report with all the qualifications and considerations mentioned herein. Details of our conclusions and recommendations are discussed in the report text. 1364 Tuskawilla Retail Development Revised December 15, 2020 ECS Project No. 24:6366 Page 5 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 GENERAL The purpose of this study was to provide geotechnical information for the design of structure foundations and construction consideration and recommendations for the proposed Tuskawilla Retail Development. This report includes preliminary recommendations regarding the new buildings, pavements, stormwater management area, and associated utilities. This report contains the results of our subsurface explorations and laboratory testing programs, site characterization, engineering analyses, and recommendations for the design and construction of the proposed development. The recommendations developed for this report are based on project information supplied by Equinox Development Properties, Inc. 1.2 SCOPE OF SERVICES In order to explore the subsurface soil conditions and to determine the depth and character of soils on this site, a total of nineteen (19) soil test borings were performed within the proposed area of the development. A Conceptual Sketch dated August 8, 2018 of the proposed development prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. was provided prior to the field exploration and a revised Conceptual Sketch dated October 30, 2018 was provided after the field exploration had been completed. Additionally, this report has been revised based on an updated Overall Site Plan dated November 3, 2020 prepared by Marcus Gieger with Kimley-Horn. The Boundary and Topographic Survey dated October 15, 2018 prepared by Shannon Surveying, Inc. was also provided at the time of writing this report. Conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based upon these soil borings, a site reconnaissance, laboratory test results of boring samples, and provided plans. This preliminary report discusses our exploratory and testing procedures, presents our findings and evaluations and includes the following: • A brief review and description of our field and laboratory test procedures and the results of testing conducted. • A review of surface topographical features and site conditions. • A review of area and site geologic conditions. • A review of subsurface soil stratigraphy with pertinent available physical properties. • Copies of our soil test boring logs. • Preliminary recommendations for site preparation and construction of compacted fills, including an evaluation of on-site soils for use as compacted fills and delineation of potentially unsuitable soils and/or soils exhibiting excessive moisture at the time of sampling. • Evaluation and recommendations relative to groundwater control. • Preliminary foundation recommendations for the proposed retail buildings. • Preliminary recommendations for pavement design. • Stormwater management design parameters for the ten (10) proposed stormwater management facilities anticipated within the property. 1365 Tuskawilla Retail Development Revised December 15, 2020 ECS Project No. 24:6366 Page 6 The recommendations contained herein were developed from the data obtained in the soil test borings, which indicate subsurface conditions at these specific locations at the time of exploration. Soil conditions may vary between the borings. If during the co urse of construction variations appear evident; the Geotechnical Engineer should be informed so that the conditions can be addressed. 1.3 AUTHORIZATION Our services were provided in accordance with our Proposal No. 24:12884-GP dated August 17, 2018 and as authorized by you on September 22, 2018, and includes the Terms and Conditions of Service outlined with our Proposal/Contract between ECS Florida, LLC and Equinox Development Properties, Inc. 1366 Tuskawilla Retail Development Revised December 15, 2020 ECS Project No. 24:6366 Page 7 2.0 PROJECT INFORMATION 2.1 PROJECT LOCATION The subject site is located to the southwest of the intersection between Tuskawilla Road and State Road 434, more specifically at 170 Tuskawilla Road in Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida. The subject property (approximately 9.95 acres in size) is pentagonal in shape, generally bounded to the north by State Road 434, to the east by Tuskawilla Road, to the south by a vacant property and to the west by a residential community. A Conceptual Sketch is included below and within Appendix A of this report. Figure 2.1.1 – Approximate Site Location 2.2 PAST SITE HISTORY/USES A review of available aerial imagery dated back to 1980 and our knowledge of the site, we understand that the site is primarily heavily wooded with a retail building located within the north eastern corner of the proposed area of development which appears to have been built in either the 1980s or 1990s. 2.3 CURRENT SITE CONDITIONS Based on our site reconnaissance and review of the topographic data, provided by you from Shannon Surveying Inc., dated October 15, 2018, the site is sloping from the south downward to primarily the northwestern portion of the proposed development with existing ground surface elevations varying approximately between EL. +46 feet-datum and EL. +42.5 feet-datum. A boring location survey was not performed as a part of our scope. 2.4 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION Our understanding of the proposed construction is based on information provided by Equinox Development Properties, Inc and the Overall Site Plan dated November 3, 2020 prepared by Marcus Gieger with Kimley-Horn. Based on our understanding of the project, the proposed 1367 Tuskawilla Retail Development Revised December 15, 2020 ECS Project No. 24:6366 Page 8 construction would likely consist of multiple structures including, four (4) one-story retail buildings (approximately between 4,280 and 19,209 square feet, respectively) two (2) out parcel building (approximately 2,325 and 3,056 square feet). Site features are to include a stormwater , one (1) wet pond, two (2) dry retention pond areas within the southern portion of the site, and the associated paved parking areas with five (5) underground exfiltration systems within the northern portion of the property, driveway lanes, and utilities. We would anticipate based on current site grading as well surrounding grading for adjacent commercial properties that the proposed structures may be supported on conventional shallow foundations bearing at an assumed elevation of EL. +42 feet-datum on natural soils. We assumed that finished floor elevation of the proposed structures would be approximately at EL. +44 feet- datum. Based on the existing and proposed grades, we expect maximum fills for the stru ctures to be on the order of 3 feet given the current conceptual drawings for the development. We understand structural loads for the retail structures will be up to approximately 80 kips for column loading, and we have assumed continuous wall loading up to about 5 kips per linear foot. 1368 Tuskawilla Retail Development Revised December 15, 2020 ECS Project No. 24:6366 Page 9 3.0 FIELD EXPLORATION 3.1 FIELD EXPLORATION PROGRAM The field exploration was planned with the objective of providing an assessment of the site, characterizing the project site in general geotechnical and geological terms and to evaluate subsequent field and laboratory data to assist in the determination of geotechnical recommendations. 3.1.1 Test Borings Prior to performing the subsurface exploration, underground utilities were located through the Sunshine State One-Call system. The soil test borings were located in the field by an ECS representative utilizing a hand held GPS unit as reference. The Boring Location Diagram in the Appendix A indicates the approximate location of the borings. The soil test borings were completed with the following drilling and sampling equipment: • ATV drill rig • Mud Rotary drilling utilizing 3 ¼ inch hollow-stem augers • Manual hammer • Conventional split-spoon soil sampler Representative soil samples were obtained by means of the split-barrel sampling procedure in accordance with ASTM Specification D 1586. In this procedure, a two-inch O.D., split-spoon sampler is driven into the soil a distance of 18 inches by a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampler through the final 12-inch interval, after initial setting of 6 inches, is termed the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) N-value and is indicated for each sample on the boring logs (attached in Appendix B). The SPT values can be used as a qualitative indication of the in-place relative density of cohesionless soils, and as a relative indication of consistency in cohesive soils. This indication is qualitative, since many factors can significantly affect the standard penetration resistance value and prevent a direct correlation between drill crews, drill rigs, drilling procedures, and hammer-rod-sampler assemblies. A field log of the soil encountered at each boring was maintained by the drilling crew. After recovery, each geotechnical sample was removed from the sampler and visually classified by the driller. Representative portions of each sample were then sealed in containers and transported to our laboratory in Orlando, Florida for further visual examination and laboratory testing. After completion of the drilling operations, the boreholes were backfilled with auger cuttings. Please note that ground surface elevations noted on our boring logs were interpolated from the Boundary and Topographic Survey dated October 15, 2018 prepared by Shannon Surveying, Inc.; however, we recommend that the boring locations are surveyed for elevations to extend the usefulness of the subsurface information obtained. 1369 Tuskawilla Retail Development Revised December 15, 2020 ECS Project No. 24:6366 Page 10 3.2 REGIONAL/SITE GEOLOGY Based on the Geologic Map of Florida, Central Florida geologic conditions can generally be described in terms of three basic sedimentary layers. The near-surface layer is primarily composed of sands containing varying amounts of silt and clay fines that are underlain by a layer of clay, clayey sand, locally referred to as the “Hawthorn Group” which is underlain by phosphate, and limestone. The thickness of these strata varies throughout Central Florida. In general, the surficial sands typically extend to depths of 40 feet to 70 feet below the ground surface, while the “Hawthorn Group” ranges from nearly absent in some locations to thicknesses greater than 100 feet. The limestone formation may be several thousand feet thick. The groundwater hydrogeology of Central Florida can be described in terms of the nature and relationship of the three basic geologic strata. The near surface and upper stratum are fairly permeable and comprise the water table (unconfined) aquifer. The deep limestone formation of the Floridian aquifer is highly permeable due to the presence of large interconnected channels and cavities throughout the rock. The Floridian aquifer is the primary source of drinking water in Central Florida. These two permeable strata are separated by the relatively low permeability clays in the “Hawthorn Group.” The amount of groundwater flow between the two aquifer systems is dependent on the thickness and consistency of the “Hawthorn Group” clay confining beds which, as previously stated, varies widely throughout Central Florida. The following Figure 3.2.1 shows the regional geologic map. Figure 3.2.1 Regional Geologic Map (Geologic Map of Florida, 2001) 3.3 KARST GEOLOGY Areas within Central Florida are known to have karst geology. Karst terrain is characterized by voids, soil domes, soil raveling, interrupted drainage, disappearing streams, and topographical Approx. Site Location 1370 Tuskawilla Retail Development Revised December 15, 2020 ECS Project No. 24:6366 Page 11 features such as sinkholes and closed depressions. These features are the result of the dissolution of soluble bedrock such as limestone by groundwater and/or the infiltration of surface water. As water enters fractures, bedding planes, and other bedrock discontinuities within soluble bedrock, it slowly dissolves the rock and enlarges the discontinuities. Over geologic time, this results in the formation of solution channels or underground passages and ravines which may develop into surficial manifestations such as sinkholes and closed depressions. The dissolution of bedrock is generally a very slow process. However, soil may be eroded or raveled into the enlarged bedrock fractures, creating soil domes. Eventually, soil in these features can be lost through groundwater movement, resulting in surface depressions and potential sudden ground subsidence. The soils derived from and overlying the carbonate bedrock are typically a clayey and silty soil with varying amounts of sand and rock fragments. The bedrock within the general geographic region is characterized by jointed and faulted soluble carbonate lithologies interbedded with non- carbonate lithologies. These carbonate formations are generally moderately to highly solution prone. The degree of weathering or solutioning is often controlled by lithological variations and structural orientations. Where structural discontinuities intersect or in areas which are highly fractured, solutioning is intensified creating low areas and seams that are typically filled with residual clayey soils. Conversely, more competent, high areas represent slightly- to non-fractured lithologies that are often coarser grained and only slightly solution prone. The underlying carbonate formations of the project geographic area are susceptible to Karst- related sinkhole development. Contributing characteristics and factors controlling the development include subsurface structural deformation, joint sets, and thick carbonate bedding within the area. Due to the shallow nature of the exploration performed, the borings did not reveal overt signs of soils associated with karst activity or carbonate rocks. 3.4 SOIL SURVEY MAPPING Based on the Soil Survey for Seminole County, Florida by the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Conservation Service the predominant predevelopment soil type(s) at the site is identified and a summary of characteristics of this soil series is included below in Table 3.4.1. Table 3.4.1 Soil Survey Soil Type Constituents Drainage Class Water Table Depth 20—Myakka and EauGallie Fine sand Poorly drained 0.5 to 1.5 feet 24—Paola-St. Lucie sands, 0 to 5 percent slopes Sand Excessively drained - 31—Tavares-Millhopper complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes Fine sand and sandy loam Moderately well drained 3.5 to 6 feet Soil mapping of the site vicinity showing soil numbers (20, 24, and 31) are presented in Figure 3.4.1 below. 1371 Tuskawilla Retail Development Revised December 15, 2020 ECS Project No. 24:6366 Page 12 Figure 3.4.1 Site Soil Survey 3.5 SUBSURFACE CHARACTERIZATION The site subsurface conditions were evaluated with 19 SPT borings advanced to the depths ranging between 10 feet and 20 feet below the existing ground surface at the approximate locations shown on the Boring Location Diagram in Appendix A. The quantity of borings, boring locations, and drilling depths were developed by ECS prior to performing subsurface exploration based on the type and location of the proposed development from the Kimley-Horn Conceptual Sketch dated August 8, 2018. The subsurface exploration at each boring location indicated generally SAND (SP) and SAND WITH SIL (SP-SM) from existing grade to the maximum termination of the borings (20 feet below existing grade). The soil auger was able to reach the termination depth at each of the borings. SPT N-values ranged from 5 to 19 blows per foot (bpf). The loose soils encountered were primarily observed within the upper 10 feet of the subsurface profiles The subsurface conditions at each boring are summarized in Table 3.5.1. The subsurface conditions presented in Table 3.5.1 and shown on the Boring Logs should be considered approximate, based on interpretation of the exploration data using normally accepted geotechnical engineering judgments. It should be noted that transitions between different soil strata are typically less distinct than what is shown on the exploration records. Subsurface conditions between the actual boring locations will vary. N 24 31 20 1372 Tuskawilla Retail Development Revised December 15, 2020 ECS Project No. 24:6366 Page 13 Table 3.5.1 Subsurface Stratigraphy Approximate Depth Range (ft) Approximate Elev. Range (ft) (1) Stratum Description Ranges of SPT(2) N-values (bpf) 0 – 20(3) +45.5 to +22.5 I SAND (SP), SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM) 5 to 19 Notes: (1) Please note elevations at the boring locations were estimated based upon the Boundary and Topographic Survey dated October 15, 2018 prepared by Shannon Surveying, Inc. and should be considered approximate. (2) Standard Penetration Test. (3) Maximum Termination Depth. 3.6 GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS Groundwater levels were measured in our borings as noted on the soil boring logs in Appendix B. The groundwater table was measured approximately between 3.5 feet and 5.5 feet below the existing grades at the boring locations within the drilling depths at the time of our exploration. No further groundwater measurements were made subsequent to drilling operations. Variations in the long-term water table may occur as a result of changes in precipitation, evaporation, surface water runoff, construction activities, and other factors. The groundwater will fluctuate seasonally depending upon local rainfall. The rainy season in Central Florida is normally between June and September. Based upon our site specific field data, our review of the USDA Soils Survey of Seminole County, the topography of the area, the expected regional hydrogeology and our experience in the area, we estimate the seasonal high groundwater levels likely to be encountered approximately between 2.5 feet and 5 feet below existing grades at the boring locations. Please refer to the individual boring logs presented in Appendix B for boring specific groundwater levels. Variations in the location of the long-term groundwater level may occur as a result of changes in precipitation, evaporation, surface water runoff, and other factors not apparent at the time of this exploration. The summary of groundwater conditions within the boring locations are provided below in Table 3.6.1. 1373 Tuskawilla Retail Development Revised December 15, 2020 ECS Project No. 24:6366 Page 14 Table 3.6.1 Summary of Groundwater Conditions Boring ID Approximate Ground Surface Elevation (ft- datum) * Encountered Ground Water Table Depth (ft) Encountered Groundwater Table Elevation (ft-datum) Estimated Seasonal High Ground Water Table Depth (ft) Estimated Seasonal High Ground Water Elevation (ft- datum) B-1 44 4.5 39.5 3.5 40.5 B-2 44 5 39 4 40 B-3 43.5 3.5 40 2.5 41 B-4 44.5 4.5 40 3.5 41 B-5 45 5.5 39.5 4.5 40.5 B-6 45.5 5 40.5 4 41.5 B-7 42.5 4 38.5 3 39.5 B-8 43 4.5 38.5 3.5 39.5 B-9 45 5.5 39.5 5 40 B-10 45.5 5.5 40 5 40.5 B-11 45 5.5 39.5 4.5 40.5 B-12 44 5.5 38.5 4.5 39.5 B-13 44.5 4 40.5 3 41.5 B-14 45 5 40 4 41 B-15 45 5 40 4 41 B-16 45 5 40 4 41 B-17 43.5 4.5 39 3.5 39.5 B-18 44.5 4.5 40 4 40.5 B-19 45 4 41 3.5 41.5 Note: * Elevations at the boring locations were estimated using the Boundary and Topographic Survey dated October 15, 2018 prepared by Shannon Surveying, Inc. 1374 Tuskawilla Retail Development Revised December 15, 2020 ECS Project No. 24:6366 Page 15 4.0 LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM The laboratory testing performed by ECS for this project consisted of selected tests performed on samples obtained during our field exploration operations. The following paragraphs briefly discuss the results of the completed laboratory testing program. 4.1 VISUAL CLASSIFICATION Each soil sample from the test borings was visually classified on the basis of texture and plasticity in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) and ASTM D 2488 (Description and Identification of Soils-Visual/Manual Procedures). After classification, the various soil types were grouped into the major zones noted on the boring logs in Appendix B. The group symbols for each soil type are indicated in parentheses following the soil descriptions on the boring logs. The stratification lines designating the interfaces between earth materials on the boring logs are approximate; in situ, the transitions may be gradual. The soil samples from our current exploration will be retained in our laboratory for a period of two months after the subsurface exploration program is completed, after which they will be discarded unless other instructions are received as to their disposition. 4.2 INDEX TESTING The index testing performed by ECS for this project consisted of selected tests performed on samples obtained during our field exploration operations. Index property tests were performed on representative soil samples obtained from the test borings in order to aid in classifying soils according to the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) and to quantify and correlate engineering properties. The index testing program included natural moisture content tests (ASTM D 2216) and percent passing the No. 200 sieve (ASTM D 6913). The results of the index testing results conducted are included in Appendix C of this report. 1375 Tuskawilla Retail Development Revised December 15, 2020 ECS Project No. 24:6366 Page 16 5.0 PRELIMINARY DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS The following sections provide preliminary recommendations for foundation design, pavements and the stormwater management facilities. Loose soils and shallow groundwater condition are likely to be encountered near-surface. The existing building, associated asphalt pavement and utilities within the eastern portion of the property will need to be removed prior to proposed development. Based on our subsurface exploration, the proposed site is feasible given the preliminary recommendations provided within this report. Details associated with the preliminary geotechnical recommendations are provided below. 5.1 BUILDING DESIGN Based upon information provided at the time this report was prepared, the site is feasible for the proposed development from a geotechnical perspective. It is our professional opinion that subsurface conditions are not likely to significantly impact the construction of the proposed development. However, a temporary dewatering program during the installation of the foundations may be necessary based upon the final grades especially during the rainy season given the shallow estimated seasonal high groundwater level. As previously noted, the site appears to consist of an existing structure within the eastern portion of the property. Uncontrolled fill soils which could contain construction debris and organics from in-place or placed topsoil grubbing operations, while not encountered during this exploration, may be present within the depths of excavation. Special attention should be taken to observe such conditions, if encountered during the foundation excavations. If uncontrolled fill soils are observed, we recommend test pits be performed within the vicinity of the foundation during a final geotechnical exploration in order to access the potential extents and depths of these materials. All asphalt pavement, structural and site components (foundation, slabs, and utilities) of the existing facility located within the proposed building pad or canopy areas should be removed prior to construction; however, the existing limerock may remain in place if determined to be suitable based upon the design criteria, laboratory testing and satisfactory proofroll testing as determined by the Geotechnical Engineer of Record. 5.2 FOUNDATIONS We anticipate that the proposed structures for this site can be supported on a shallow foundations after adequate site preparation procedures. Upon successful completion of the recommended site preparation procedure, the anticipated structures would be able to be supported on shallow foundations sized to exert a maximum allowable soil bearing pressure of 3,000 pounds per square foot (psf). The estimate of maximum allowable bearing pressure is based on assumed column and wall foundation loads of 80 kips and 5 kips per linear foot, respectively bearing at an elevation of approximately EL. +42 feet-datum on natural or controlled, compacted fill soils. If loads are higher than assumed, ECS should be contacted to review the foundation recommendations. Based on the Conceptual Sketch dated October 30, 2018 prepared by Kimley-Horn and existing site grades, we assumed the final finished floor elevation of the proposed structure to be approximately at EL. +44 feet-datum. The estimate of allowable bearing pressure may be refined based on more 1376 Tuskawilla Retail Development Revised December 15, 2020 ECS Project No. 24:6366 Page 17 precise estimates of loads (provided by the structural engineer) and proposed site grades. The foundations should be designed based on the maximum load which could be imposed by all loading conditions. All shallow foundations should be embedded at least 18 inches below lowest adjacent grade. Further, we recommend minimum foundation widths of 18 and 24 inches of strip and square footings, respectively, even though the maximum allowable soil bearing pressure may not be developed in all cases. Post-construction settlements of the structure will be influenced by several interrelated factors, including: (1) strength and compressibility characteristics of the subsurface; (2) footing size, bearing level, applied loads, and resulting bearing pressures beneath the foundations; and (3) site preparation and earthwork construction techniques used by the contractor. Our settlement estimates for the structure are based on the use of the earthwork construction techniques as recommended in Section 6.2 of this report. Any deviation from these recommendations could result in an increase in the estimated post-construction settlements of the structure. Assuming the site preparation procedure as outlined is followed; we estimate that total post construction settlements of the structure are likely to be 1 inch or less. If the recommended earthwork construction techniques outlined in this report are followed, differential settlements of 0.75 inch or less should be anticipated. The above settlement estimates are based on the assumed maximum structural loads, recommended maximum allowable bearing pressure, and the field data. 5.3 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS It is our understanding that the proposed development is likely to include a proposed three (3) stormwater dry retention pond areas within the southern portion of the proposed development and seven (7) exfiltration systems within the northern portion of the site. Based on the laboratory test results obtained from the borings performed around the underground exfiltration systems areas (B-2 through B-6, B-8, B-9, B-11, B-12, B-14 and B-16), two (2) dry pond areas (B-1, B-7, and B-13) and wet pond area (B-18 and B-19), the upper stratum is classified predominantly as Fine SAND (SP) and Fine SAND with SILT (SP-SM) to the maximum termination of depth of borings (20 feet below existing grades). The groundwater table was encountered between approximately 4 feet to 5.5 feet below the existing grades at the boring locations within the drilling depths at the time of our exploration, and therefore the seasonal high groundwater level is estimated to between approximately between 3 feet to 5 feet below existing grades. Table 5.3.1 outlines the recommended design parameters for the proposed stormwater dry pond area within the southern portion of the property. 1377 Tuskawilla Retail Development Revised December 15, 2020 ECS Project No. 24:6366 Page 18 Table 5.3.1 Dry Stormwater System Design Subsurface Input Design Parameters Stormwater System ID Boring ID Average Seasonal High Ground Water Table Elevation (ft- datum)* Average Base of Aquifer Elevation (ft-datum) * Fillable Porosity Average Horizontal Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity of Mobilized Surficial Aquifer, Kh (ft/day) Average Vertical Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity of Mobilized Surficial Aquifer, Kv (ft/day) SMA-A.1 B-1 & B-7 40.0 34.0 0.25 51** 17** SMA-A.2 B-13 41.5 35.0 0.25 SMA-C B-8, B-11, B-14, B-16 40.5 32.6 0.25 51** 17** SMA-D B-9 & B-12 39.8 29.5 0.25 51** 17** SMA-E B-6 & B-9 40.8 29.2 0.25 51** 17** SMA-F B-3 41 22.5 0.25 51** 17** SMA-G B-2, B-3, B-5, B-6 & B-8 40.5 27.9 0.25 55 37 51** 17** Notes: : * Elevations at the boring locations were estimated using the available Boundary and Topographic Survey dated October 15, 2018 prepared by Shannon Surveying, Inc., and therefore these elevations should be considered approximate to the closest half foot. ** Average Horizontal Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity of Mobilized Surficial Aquifer (Kh) and Average Vertical Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity of Mobilized Surficial Aquifer (Kv) factored values selected by Kimley Horn for recovery analysis.. Table 5.5.1 Stormwater System Design Parameters Stormwater System ID Boring ID Average Seasonal High Ground Water Table Elevation (ft-datum)* Average Wet Season Groundwat er Table Elevation (ft-datum) * Average Normal Seasonal Low Ground Water Table Elevation (ft-datum) * Average Horizontal Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity of Mobilized Surficial Aquifer, Kh (ft/day) Average Vertical Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity of Mobilized Surficial Aquifer, Kv (ft/day) SMA-B B-18 & B-19 41.0 40.5 39.5 51 34 Notes: : * Elevations at the boring locations were estimated using the available Boundary and Topographic Survey dated October 15, 2018 prepared by Shannon Surveying, Inc., and therefore these elevations should be considered approximate to the closest half foot. Please note that the hydraulic conductivity values presented in table above do not incorporate any factors of safety, except as otherwise noted. Appropriate factors of safety will have to be applied during design and drawdown analysis. Moreover, please note that parameters presented in the table above are based on assumptions made to ground surface elevations noted on our boring logs are approximately based on the Boundary and Topographic Survey dated October 15, 2018 prepared by Shannon Surveying, Inc. our surface elevations with one-foot contour intervals; therefore, should be considered approximate to the closest half foot. We recommend that boring location survey be performed by a professional surveyor to extend the usefulness of the subsurface information obtained. 1378 Tuskawilla Retail Development Revised December 15, 2020 ECS Project No. 24:6366 Page 19 ECS can perform a baseflow/groundwater seepage analysis once the stormwater pond configurations have been established. The stormwater pond bottom and side slopes should be stabilized according to applicable Water Management district and local municipality guidelines. 5.4 PAVEMENT DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS As discussed in the aforementioned Design Considerations Section 5.0, the subsurface conditions are suitable for the proposed pavement design. General Recommendations: Our scope of services did not include extensive sampling and Limerock Bearing Ratio (LBR) testing of existing subgrade or potential sources of imported fill for the specific purpose of a detailed pavement analysis. Instead, we have assumed pavement- related design parameters that are considered to be typical for the area soil types and roadway type as per the “FDOT Standards & Specifications”. The recommended pavement thicknesses presented in this report section are considered typical and minimum for the assumed parameters in the general site area. We understand that budgetary considerations sometimes warrant thinner pavement sections than those presented. However, the client, the owner, and the project designers should be aware that thinner pavement sections may result in increased maintenance costs and lower than anticipated pavement life. We recommend the following pavement sectio n designs included in Table 5.6.1 below. Table 5.4.1 Pavement Sections Asphalt Concrete Component Standard Heavy Standard Heavy Stabilized Subgrade 12” 12” 12” 12” Base Course 6” 8” N/A N/A Surface Course 1.5” 2” 5” 6” All pavement subgrades should be prepared in accordance with the recommendations presented in the section entitled Earthwork Operations. In areas where Portland cement concrete pavement is planned, the concrete should be placed upon a minimum of 12 inches of compacted, free draining material and compacted to 98 percent of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D1557). In areas where asphaltic concrete pavements are used, we suggest stabilizing the subgrade materials to a minimum Florida Bearing Value (FBV) of 75 pounds per square inch (psi). As an alternate for the FBV, materials can have a LBR of 40 percent. All stabilized subgrade materials should be compacted to 98 percent of the Modified Proctor (ASTM D -1557) maximum dry density and meet specification requirements for Type B or Type C Stabilized Subgrade by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). The stabilized subgrade may consist of imported material or a blend of on-site soils and imported materials. If a blend is proposed, we recommend that the contractor performs a mix design to find the optimum mix proportions. 1379 Tuskawilla Retail Development Revised December 15, 2020 ECS Project No. 24:6366 Page 20 Base Course: Based on the groundwater conditions encountered at the subject property, it is our professional opinion that crushed concrete or limerock are likely to be the economical and feasible base course options for this project. Limerock should follow a minimum LBR of 100 percent and should be mined from an FDOT approved source. Place limerock in maximum six-inch lifts and compact each lift to a minimum density of 95 percent of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D-1557). Crushed concrete should follow the FDOT specification for material qualifications and placement. Place crushed concrete base in maximum 6-inch lifts and compact to a minimum density of 95 percent of the Modified Proctor (ASTM D-1557) maximum dry density according to their specification. Perform compliance testing for the base course to a depth of one foot at a frequency of one test per 5,000 square feet, or at a minimum of two test locations, whichever is greater. Effects of Groundwater: One of the most critical influences on the pavement performance in Central Florida is the relationship between the pavement subgrade and the seasonal high groundwater level. Roadways and parking areas that have not considered these effects typically exhibit signs of deterioration due to degradation of the base and the base/surface course bond. Regardless of the type of base selected, we recommend that the seasonal high groundwater (SHGWT) and the bottom of the base course be separated by at least 12 inches for crushed concrete and 18 inches for limerock. Please note that a higher separation criterion between SHGWT and bottom of the base course may be required based on reviewing agency indication. Landscape Drains and Curbing: If needed, where landscaped sections are located adjacent to parking lots or driveways, we recommend that drains be installed around these landscaped sections to protect the asphalt pavement from excess rainfall and over irrigation. Migration of irrigation water from the landscape areas to the interface between the asphalt and the base usually occurs unless landscape drains are installed. This migration often causes separation of the wearing surface from the base and subsequent rippling and pavement deterioration. The underdrains or strip drains should be routed to a positive outfall at the pavement area catch basins. It is recommended that curbing around landscaped sections adjacent to parking lots and driveways be constructed with full-depth curb sections. Using extended curb sections which lie directly on top of the final asphalt level, or eliminating curbing entirely, can allow migration of irrigation water from the landscaped areas to the interface between the asphalt and the base. This migration often causes separation of the wearing surface from the base and subsequent rippling and pavement deterioration. 1380 Tuskawilla Retail Development Revised December 15, 2020 ECS Project No. 24:6366 Page 21 6.0 SITE CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS 6.1 SUBGRADE PREPARATION 6.1.1 Stripping and Subgrade Preparation The subgrade preparation should consist of stripping vegetation, rootmat, topsoil, any existing fill materials and any other soft or unsuitable materials from the 10-feet expanded building limit and 5-feet expanded pavement limits. Stripping limits should be extended an additional 1 foot for each foot of fill required at the structure's exterior edge. These activities should include removing soft and/or wet soils or otherwise unsuitable surface materials. It should be anticipated that existing subgrade materials from the site will be loose and wet. A contingency should be included in the budget for isolated undercutting during proofroll operations. In the building areas, the depth of the soft wet soil, if encountered, should be removed to stable soil and replaced with approved structural fill. If the depth of unsuitable material is identified to be deeper than 3 feet below design subgrade in foundation or pavement areas, then alternative pavement subgrade stabilization may be considered. This could consist of excavating down a maximum of 3 feet below the pavement s ubgrade elevation, placing geogrid (such as Mirafi BXG-11 or approved equivalent), and then placing granular material over the grid to the design subgrade elevation. The actual depth of the undercut and/or remedial approach will vary depending on the conditions and should be evaluated at the time of construction. The contractor should have a dewatering plan prepared in order to control high groundwater conditions observed on site. The amount and frequency of precipitation may also affect the groundwater conditions. The contractor should make provisions to keep excavations dry during construction to maintain the integrity of the exposed soils and help reduce the potential for otherwise unnecessary remedial work. Erosion and sedimentation shall be controlled in accordance with Best Management Practices and current state, local, and NPDES requirements. At the appropriate time, we would be pleased to provide a proposal for construction materials testing and NPDES related services. 6.1.2 Proofrolling Following the stripping operations and prior to the placement of structural fills or structural elements, the exposed subgrade soils should be observed by a geotechnical engineer or their approved representative. Proofrolling using a loaded dump truck, having an axle weight of at least 10 tons, may be used at this time to aid in identifying localized soft or unsuitable materials that should be removed. Any soft or unsuitable material encountered during proofrolling should be removed to a stable subgrade and replaced with an approved backfill compacted to the criteria given below. Due to the loose soils encountered within this exploration a representative of the Geotechnical Engineer of Record is recommended to be on-site during the proofroll of the building pad areas to confirm the suitability of the natural soils prior to the placement of structural fill or foundations. The natural soils within the building pad areas should be densified with a 20 ton smooth drum roller that should traverse the pads in a perpendicular (orthogonal) pattern using 1381 Tuskawilla Retail Development Revised December 15, 2020 ECS Project No. 24:6366 Page 22 the maximum vibratory setting prior to commencing proofroll operations and subsequent structural fill placement. 6.2 EARTHWORK OPERATIONS 6.2.1 Structural Fill Materials After subgrade preparation and observation has been completed and a stable subgrade exists, fill placement may begin. Structural fill materials should not be placed on soils which have been recently subjected to precipitation. Wet soils should be removed prior to the placement of engineered fill, granular sub-base materials, foundation/slab concrete, or paving materials. Materials used as structural fill for shallow fill areas should consist of approved material classified as SP, SP-SM, SM, SC or more granular, which are free of debris, particles larger than 3 inches in diameter (4-inches for trench/utility backfill), organic inclusions, cinders, ash, or excess moisture. It should be noted that the soils observed within the proposed dry pond area would be considered suitable for use as structural fill; however, due to the nature of the high groundwater table there should be consideration with respect to a time allowance for these soils to dry prior to compactive effort being applied. Due to the coarse, granular nature of the soils, we would expect the soils to dry relatively quickly during periods of no precipitation. Prior to placement of structural fill, representative bulk samples (about 50 pounds) of on-site and off-site borrow should be submitted to ECS for laboratory testing, which will include natural moisture content, grain-size distribution, and moisture-density relationships for compaction. Import materials should be tested prior to being hauled to the site to determine if they meet project specifications. The structural fill, consisting of suitable on-site soils or off-site granular borrow material, or a mixture thereof, should be placed in essentially horizontal lifts with a maximum loose thickness of 8 inches and moisture conditioned to within +3 percentage points of the optimum moisture content. Structural fill should be placed and compacted to a minimum compaction of 95% of the maximum dry density in accordance with the Modified Proctor method (ASTM D1557). Each lift of compacted engineered fill should be tested by a representative of the geotechnical engineer prior to placement of subsequent lifts. Compaction testing should be performed at the rate of at least 1 test per 2,500 square feet for each lift of fill within the building pad and at the rate of at least 1 test per 5,000 square feet for each lift of fill outside of the building pad, with a minimum of 3 tests per lift of fill within the building footprint. The elevation and location of the tests should be accurately identified at the time of fill placement. Areas which fail to achieve the required degree of compaction should be recompacted and retested until minimum compaction is achieved. Failing test areas may require adjustments in moisture content or other suitabl e remedial activities in order to achieve the required compaction. The expanded limits of the proposed construction areas should be well defined, including the limits of the fill zones for buildings, pavements, and slopes, etc., at the time of fill placement. Grade controls should be maintained throughout the filling operations. Compaction equipment suitable to the soil type being compacted should be used to compact the subgrades and fill materials. Sheepsfoot compaction equipment should be suitable for the fine- 1382 Tuskawilla Retail Development Revised December 15, 2020 ECS Project No. 24:6366 Page 23 grained soils (Clays and Silts). A vibratory steel drum roller should be used for compaction of coarse-grained soils (Sands) as well as for sealing compacted surfaces. In confined areas such as utility trenches, portable compaction equipment and thin lifts of 3 to 4 inches may be required to achieve specified degrees of compaction. At the end of each work day, all fill areas should be graded to facilitate drainage of any precipitation and the surface should be sealed by use of a smooth-drum roller to limit infiltration of surface water. During placement and compaction of new fill at the beginning of each workday, the contractor may need to scarify existing subgrades to a depth on the order of 4 inches so that a weak plane will not be formed between the new fill and the existing subgrade soils. Positive site drainage should be maintained during earthwork operations in an effort to maintain the integrity of the site surface soil. When wet, the site soils may degrade quickly with disturbance from contractor operations and will be extremely difficult to stabilize for fill placement. Consequently, the contractor should be prepared to implement aggressive mechanical or chemical drying, depending upon the actual site conditions. We strongly recommend that mass grading for the project be performed during the drier summer months to help facilitate favorable moisture conditions for the site soils. If water must be added to raise the moisture content of the soil, it should be uniformly applied and thoroughly mixed into the soil. In addition to maintaining proper site drainage for the purpose of maintaining the integrity of the site soils, care must be taken to control the surface water flow due to the inherent risks associated with risk for sinkhole development as previously discussed. 6.3 UTILITY INSTALLATIONS Utility Subgrades and Excavation: The soils encountered in our exploration are expected to be generally suitable for support of utility pipes to include an underground storage tank (UST). The pipe subgrade, especially where existing fill was encountered, should be observed and probed for stability by the testing agency to evaluate the suitability of the materials encountered. Any loose or unsuitable materials encountered at the utility pipe subgrade elevation should be removed and replaced with suitable compacted structural fill or pipe bedding material. Based upon the type of soils and high groundwater table encountered on site, the contractor will need to consider installing trench boxes during deep utility and UST excavations. Utility Backfilling: The granular bedding material should be at least 4 inches thick, but not less than that specified by the project drawings and specifications. Fill placed for support of the utilities, as well as backfill over the utilities, should satisfy the requirements for structural fill given in this report. Compacted backfill should be free of topsoil, roots, ice, or any other material designated as unsuitable. The backfill should be moisture conditioned, placed, and compacted in accordance with the recommendations of this report. Where the utility and UST will be located below water, the contractor should be aware of potential buoyancy and tie down the pipes or UST structure. In addition, soil backfill will not be able to be compacted. In this case, backfill can consist of FDOT 57 stone to approximately 1 foot over the water level, a fabric separator placed, followed by compacted fill to design subgrade. Utility Excavation Dewatering: Groundwater will likely be encountered for UST and utility excavations. Depending on the amount of controlled fill and the depth of the utility, pumping from the excavations may not be enough for the installation of the utility and UST. Well points 1383 Tuskawilla Retail Development Revised December 15, 2020 ECS Project No. 24:6366 Page 24 would need to be considered if localized dewatering equipment such as sump pumps are unable to control water during the installation of the utilities and UST. It is expected that removal of perched water which seeps into excavations could be accomplished by pu mping from sumps excavated in the trench bottom and which are backfilled with FDOT Size No. 57 Stone or open graded bedding material. Should water conditions beyond the capability of sump pumping be encountered, the contractor should submit a Dewatering Plan in accordance with project specifications. 6.4 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS Site Drainage and Surface Water Control: Adequate temporary and permanent control of surface water runoff will be required in order to allow site access, grading and construction to proceed. Standing water or ice should be removed from the completed building pad and pavement subgrades as soon as practical after each precipitation event without damaging the subgrade throughout the construction period. This may include the use of temporary under-drains, sump pits and pumps, plowing, or other means. In addition, the building pad and pavement subgrades should be maintained on a regular basis to grade out any ruts or low points where water may accumulate, and to aerate and/or re-compact any areas disturbed by weather or construction activities. The responsibility for this maintenance role should be clearly defined in the contract documents. Subgrade Protection: Measures should also be taken to limit site disturbance, especially from rubber-tired heavy construction equipment, and to control and remove surface water from development areas, including structural and pavement areas. It would be advisable to designate a haul road and construction staging area to limit the areas of disturbance and to prevent construction traffic from excessively degrading sensitive subgrade soils and existing pavement areas. Haul roads and construction staging areas could be covered with excess depths of aggregate to protect those subgrades. The aggregate can later be removed and used in pavement areas. Excavation Safety: Cuts or excavations associated with utility excavations may require forming or bracing, slope flattening, or other physical measures to control sloughing and/or prevent slope failures. Contractors should be familiar with applicable OSHA codes to ensure that adequate protection of the excavations and trench walls is provided. Erosion Control: Install soil erosion and sedimentation control devices, as well as temporary stormwater management facilities, as specified by Site/Civil Engineer. Maintain positive drainage conditions throughout construction, avoiding unnecessary ponding of stormwater in excavations or low areas of the site. Seal-roll exposed soil or subgrade surfaces prior to rain events, and promptly remove any standing water immediately afterwards. 6.5 CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION AND TESTING Regardless of the thoroughness of a geotechnical engineering study, there is always a possibility that subsurface conditions between test borings may be different from those encountered at the test boring locations, that conditions are not as anticipated by the designers, or that the demolition or construction process has altered the subsurface conditions. Therefore, geotechnical engineering construction observation should be performed under the supervision of a qualified 1384 Tuskawilla Retail Development Revised December 15, 2020 ECS Project No. 24:6366 Page 25 Geotechnical Engineer who is familiar with the intent of the recommendations presented in this report. Such observation services are recommended to evaluate whether the conditions anticipated in the design actually exist, or whether the recommendations presented in the report should be modified where necessary. 7.0 CLOSING The report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Equinox Development Properties Inc., and their design team. ECS has prepared this report of findings, evaluations, and recommendations to guide geotechnical-related design and construction aspects of the project. The description of the proposed project is based on information provided to ECS by Equinox Development Properties Inc. If any of this information is inaccurate, either due to our interpretation of the documents provided or site or design changes that may occur later, ECS should be contacted immediately in order that we can review the report in light of the changes and provide additional or alternate recommendations as may be required to reflect the proposed construction. We recommend that ECS be allowed to review the project’s plans and specifications pertaining to our work so that we may ascertain consistency of those plans/specifications with the intent of the geotechnical report. Field observations, monitoring, and quality assurance testing during earthwork and foundation installation are an extension of and integral to the geotechnical design recommendation. We recommend that the owner retain these quality assurance services and that ECS be allowed to continue our involvement throughout these critical phases of construction to provide general consultation as issues arise. ECS is not responsible for the conclusions, opinions, or recommendations of others based on the data in this report. The scope of this investigation was limited to the evaluation of the load -carrying capabilities and load stability of the soils and bedrock. Oil, hazardous waste, radioactivity, irritants, pollutants, radon or other dangerous substances and conditions were not the subject of this study. Their presence and/or absence are not implied, inferred or suggested by this report or results of this study. 1385 Tuskawilla Retail Development Revised December 15, 2020 ECS Project No. 24:6366 APPENDIX A – Diagrams Site Location Diagram Boring Location Diagram 1386 Site Service Layer Credits: Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors ² EQUINOX DEVEL OPMENT PROPERTIES, INC. TU SKAWI LLA RETAIL DEVELOPMENT 170 TU SKAWILLA ROAD, WINTER SPRINGS, FL Site Line Location Diagram 0 2,0001,000 Feet 11/8/2018 ENGINEER SCALE 6366 1 O F 1 PROJECT NO. SHEET DATE JPH 1 " = 100 0 ' 1387 B-1 B-7 B-1 B-7 B-2B-2 B-12 B-17 B-6 B-11B-8 B-16 B-12 B-17 B-6 B-11B-8 B-16 B-4 B-9 B-15 B-5 B-10 B-14 B-3 B-4 B-9 B-15 B-5 B-10 B-14 B-3 B-13B-13 B-19 B-18 B-19 B-18 B B' C C' A A' 12/11/2020 Service La yer Cr edits: Esr i, HE RE, G armin, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors ² ENGINEER SCALE 24:6 366 1 OF 1 PROJ ECT NO. SHEET DATE JP H EQUINOX DEVELOP MENT PROPERT IES, INC.170 TUSKAWILLA RD, W IN T ER SPRINGS, FL Borin g Loc ation Diagram TUSK AWILLA RETAILDEVELOPMENT 0 20 0100Feet AS NOTED 1388 Tuskawilla Retail Development Revised December 15, 2020 ECS Project No. 24:6366 APPENDIX B – Field Operations Reference Notes for Boring Logs Boring Logs (B-1 through B-19) Cross Section A-A’ Cross Section B-B’ Cross Section C-C’ 1389 Reference Notes for Boring Logs (03-22-2017) © 2017 ECS Corporate Services, LLC. All Rights Reserved COHESIVE SILTS & CLAYS UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH, QP 4 SPT5 (BPF) CONSISTENCY7 (COHESIVE) <0.25 <3 Very Soft 0.25 - <0.50 3 - 4 Soft 0.50 - <1.00 5 - 8 Firm 1.00 - <2.00 9 - 15 Stiff 2.00 - <4.00 16 - 30 Very Stiff 4.00 - 8.00 31 - 50 Hard >8.00 >50 Very Hard GRAVELS, SANDS & NON-COHESIVE SILTS SPT5 DENSITY <5 Very Loose 5 - 10 Loose 11 - 30 Medium Dense 31 - 50 Dense >50 Very Dense REFERENCE NOTES FOR BORING LOGS 1Classifications and symbols per ASTM D 2488-09 (Visual-Manual Procedure) unless noted otherwise. 2To be consistent with general practice, “POORLY GRADED” has been removed from GP, GP-GM, GP-GC, SP, SP-SM, SP-SC soil types on the boring logs. 3Non-ASTM designations are included in soil descriptions and symbols along with ASTM symbol [Ex: (SM-FILL)]. 4Typically estimated via pocket penetrometer or Torvane shear test and expressed in tons per square foot (tsf). 5Standard Penetration Test (SPT) refers to the number of hammer blows (blow count) of a 140 lb. hammer falling 30 inches on a 2 inch OD split spoon sampler required to drive the sampler 12 inches (ASTM D 1586). “N-value” is another term for “blow count” and is expressed in blows per foot (bpf). 6The water levels are those levels actually measured in the borehole at the times indicated by the symbol. The measurements are relatively reliable when augering, without adding fluids, in granular soils. In clay and cohesive silts, the determination of water levels may require several days for the water level to stabilize. In such cases, additional methods of measurement are generally employed. 7Minor deviation from ASTM D 2488-09 Note 16. 8Percentages are estimated to the nearest 5% per ASTM D 2488-09. RELATIVE AMOUNT7 COARSE GRAINED (%)8 FINE GRAINED (%)8 Trace <5 <5 Dual Symbol (ex: SW-SM) 10 10 With 15 - 20 15 - 25 Adjective (ex: “Silty”) >25 >30 WATER LEVELS6 WL Water Level (WS)(WD) (WS) While Sampling (WD) While Drilling SHW Seasonal High WT ACR After Casing Removal SWT Stabilized Water Table DCI Dry Cave-In WCI Wet Cave-In DRILLING SAMPLING SYMBOLS & ABBREVIATIONS SS Split Spoon Sampler PM Pressuremeter Test ST Shelby Tube Sampler RD Rock Bit Drilling WS Wash Sample RC Rock Core, NX, BX, AX BS Bulk Sample of Cuttings REC Rock Sample Recovery % PA Power Auger (no sample) RQD Rock Quality Designation % HSA Hollow Stem Auger PARTICLE SIZE IDENTIFICATION DESIGNATION PARTICLE SIZES Boulders 12 inches (300 mm) or larger Cobbles 3 inches to 12 inches (75 mm to 300 mm) Gravel: Coarse ¾ inch to 3 inches (19 mm to 75 mm) Fine 4.75 mm to 19 mm (No. 4 sieve to ¾ inch) Sand: Coarse 2.00 mm to 4.75 mm (No. 10 to No. 4 sieve) Medium 0.425 mm to 2.00 mm (No. 40 to No. 10 sieve) Fine 0.074 mm to 0.425 mm (No. 200 to No. 40 sieve) Silt & Clay (“Fines”) <0.074 mm (smaller than a No. 200 sieve) MATERIAL1,2 ASPHALT CONCRETE GRAVEL TOPSOIL VOID BRICK AGGREGATE BASE COURSE FILL3 MAN-PLACED SOILS GW WELL-GRADED GRAVEL gravel-sand mixtures, little or no fines GP POORLY-GRADED GRAVEL gravel-sand mixtures, little or no fines GM SILTY GRAVEL gravel-sand-silt mixtures GC CLAYEY GRAVEL gravel-sand-clay mixtures SW WELL-GRADED SAND gravelly sand, little or no fines SP POORLY-GRADED SAND gravelly sand, little or no fines SM SILTY SAND sand-silt mixtures SC CLAYEY SAND sand-clay mixtures ML SILT non-plastic to medium plasticity MH ELASTIC SILT high plasticity CL LEAN CLAY low to medium plasticity CH FAT CLAY high plasticity OL ORGANIC SILT or CLAY non-plastic to low plasticity OH ORGANIC SILT or CLAY high plasticity PT PEAT highly organic soils 1390 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 40 35 30 25 20 15 S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 S-5 S-6 S-7 SS SS SS SS SS SS SS 24 24 24 24 24 18 18 24 24 24 24 24 18 18 Topsoil Thickness [3.00"] (SP) SAND, light gray, moist, loose (SP-SM) SAND WITH SILT, dark brown, wet, loose to medium dense (SP) SAND, light gray, wet, medium dense END OF BORING @ 20' 3 2 4 4 4 3 4 4 5 4 6 5 6 5 7 9 7 8 7 7 7 7 7 6 7 9 6 7 10 12 15 14 16 CLIENT Equinox Development Properties, Inc. Job #: 24:6366 BORING # B-4 SHEET PROJECT NAME Tuskawilla Retail Development GEO ARCHITECT-ENGINEER Kimley Horn SITE LOCATION 170 Tuskawilla Road, Winter Springs, Seminole County, FL NORTHING EASTING STATION THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES BETWEEN SOIL TYPES. IN-SITU THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL. WL 4.5'WS WD BORING STARTED 10/08/18 CAVE IN DEPTH WL(SHW)3.5'WL(ACR)BORING COMPLETED 10/08/18 HAMMER TYPE Manual WL RIG ATV FOREMAN Gary DRILLING METHOD Mud RotaryDRILLING METHOD Mud Rotary DE P T H ( F T ) SA M P L E N O . SA M P L E T Y P E SA M P L E D I S T . ( I N ) RE C O V E R Y ( I N ) SURFACE ELEVATION DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL WA T E R L E V E L S EL E V A T I O N ( F T ) BL O W S / 6 " 10 20 30 40 50+ 20%40%60%80%100% 1 2 3 4 5+ ENGLISH UNITS BOTTOM OF CASING LOSS OF CIRCULATION CALIBRATED PENETROMETER TONS/FT2 PLASTIC LIMIT % WATER CONTENT % LIQUID LIMIT % ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION & RECOVERY RQD%REC.% STANDARD PENETRATION BLOWS/FT44' 1 OF 1 1391 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 40 35 30 25 20 15 S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 S-5 S-6 S-7 SS SS SS SS SS SS SS 24 24 24 24 24 18 18 24 24 24 24 24 18 18 Topsoil Thickness [3.00"] (SP) SAND, light gray, moist, loose (SP-SM) SAND WITH SILT, dark brown, wet, loose to medium dense (SP) SAND, light gray, wet, medium dense END OF BORING @ 20' 2 2 3 5 4 5 4 4 3 5 4 6 6 5 7 7 6 8 7 8 6 7 9 8 7 8 5 9 9 12 15 16 15 CLIENT Equinox Development Properties, Inc. Job #: 24:6366 BORING # B-9 SHEET PROJECT NAME Tuskawilla Retail Development GEO ARCHITECT-ENGINEER Kimley Horn SITE LOCATION 170 Tuskawilla Road, Winter Springs, Seminole County, FL NORTHING EASTING STATION THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES BETWEEN SOIL TYPES. IN-SITU THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL. WL 5'WS WD BORING STARTED 10/08/18 CAVE IN DEPTH WL(SHW)4'WL(ACR)BORING COMPLETED 10/08/18 HAMMER TYPE Manual WL RIG ATV FOREMAN Gary DRILLING METHOD Mud RotaryDRILLING METHOD Mud Rotary DE P T H ( F T ) SA M P L E N O . SA M P L E T Y P E SA M P L E D I S T . ( I N ) RE C O V E R Y ( I N ) SURFACE ELEVATION DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL WA T E R L E V E L S EL E V A T I O N ( F T ) BL O W S / 6 " 10 20 30 40 50+ 20%40%60%80%100% 1 2 3 4 5+ ENGLISH UNITS BOTTOM OF CASING LOSS OF CIRCULATION CALIBRATED PENETROMETER TONS/FT2 PLASTIC LIMIT % WATER CONTENT % LIQUID LIMIT % ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION & RECOVERY RQD%REC.% STANDARD PENETRATION BLOWS/FT44' 1 OF 1 1392 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 40 35 30 25 20 15 S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 S-5 S-6 S-7 SS SS SS SS SS SS SS 24 24 24 24 24 18 18 24 24 24 24 24 18 18 Topsoil Thickness [3.00"] (SP) SAND, light gray, moist, loose (SP-SM) SAND WITH SILT, dark brown, wet, loose to medium dense (SP) SAND, light gray, wet, medium dense END OF BORING @ 20' 3 5 4 4 3 4 5 4 5 5 4 6 7 8 7 7 5 7 8 9 6 7 9 8 8 10 9 9 9 15 15 16 18 CLIENT Equinox Development Properties, Inc. Job #: 24:6366 BORING # B-15 SHEET PROJECT NAME Tuskawilla Retail Development GEO ARCHITECT-ENGINEER Kimley Horn SITE LOCATION 170 Tuskawilla Road, Winter Springs, Seminole County, FL NORTHING EASTING STATION THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES BETWEEN SOIL TYPES. IN-SITU THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL. WL 3.5'WS WD BORING STARTED 10/08/18 CAVE IN DEPTH WL(SHW)2.5'WL(ACR)BORING COMPLETED 10/08/18 HAMMER TYPE Manual WL RIG ATV FOREMAN Gary DRILLING METHOD Mud RotaryDRILLING METHOD Mud Rotary DE P T H ( F T ) SA M P L E N O . SA M P L E T Y P E SA M P L E D I S T . ( I N ) RE C O V E R Y ( I N ) SURFACE ELEVATION DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL WA T E R L E V E L S EL E V A T I O N ( F T ) BL O W S / 6 " 10 20 30 40 50+ 20%40%60%80%100% 1 2 3 4 5+ ENGLISH UNITS BOTTOM OF CASING LOSS OF CIRCULATION CALIBRATED PENETROMETER TONS/FT2 PLASTIC LIMIT % WATER CONTENT % LIQUID LIMIT % ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION & RECOVERY RQD%REC.% STANDARD PENETRATION BLOWS/FT43.5' 1 OF 1 1393 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 40 35 30 25 20 15 S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 S-5 S-6 S-7 SS SS SS SS SS SS SS 24 24 24 24 24 18 18 24 24 24 24 24 18 18 Topsoil Thickness [3.00"] (SP) SAND, light gray, moist, loose (SP-SM) SAND WITH SILT, dark brown, wet, medium dense (SP) SAND, light gray, wet, medium dense END OF BORING @ 20' 4 3 5 4 5 4 5 5 4 6 5 7 5 8 7 8 7 7 8 8 6 7 10 6 8 8 8 9 11 15 15 17 16 CLIENT Equinox Development Properties, Inc. Job #: 24:6366 BORING # B-5 SHEET PROJECT NAME Tuskawilla Retail Development GEO ARCHITECT-ENGINEER Kimley Horn SITE LOCATION 170 Tuskawilla Road, Winter Springs, Seminole County, FL NORTHING EASTING STATION THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES BETWEEN SOIL TYPES. IN-SITU THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL. WL 4.5'WS WD BORING STARTED 10/08/18 CAVE IN DEPTH WL(SHW)3.5'WL(ACR)BORING COMPLETED 10/08/18 HAMMER TYPE Manual WL RIG ATV FOREMAN Gary DRILLING METHOD Mud RotaryDRILLING METHOD Mud Rotary DE P T H ( F T ) SA M P L E N O . SA M P L E T Y P E SA M P L E D I S T . ( I N ) RE C O V E R Y ( I N ) SURFACE ELEVATION DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL WA T E R L E V E L S EL E V A T I O N ( F T ) BL O W S / 6 " 10 20 30 40 50+ 20%40%60%80%100% 1 2 3 4 5+ ENGLISH UNITS BOTTOM OF CASING LOSS OF CIRCULATION CALIBRATED PENETROMETER TONS/FT2 PLASTIC LIMIT % WATER CONTENT % LIQUID LIMIT % ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION & RECOVERY RQD%REC.% STANDARD PENETRATION BLOWS/FT44.5' 1 OF 1 1394 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 S-5 S-6 S-7 SS SS SS SS SS SS SS 24 24 24 24 24 18 18 24 24 24 24 24 18 18 Topsoil Thickness [3.00"] (SP) SAND, light gray, moist, loose (SP-SM) SAND WITH SILT, dark brown, wet, medium dense (SP) SAND, light gray, wet, medium dense END OF BORING @ 20' 3 4 3 3 2 4 5 5 4 5 7 8 6 7 6 7 8 7 6 8 6 7 7 5 7 8 7 9 12 13 13 14 15 CLIENT Equinox Development Properties, Inc. Job #: 24:6366 BORING # B-10 SHEET PROJECT NAME Tuskawilla Retail Development GEO ARCHITECT-ENGINEER Kimley Horn SITE LOCATION 170 Tuskawilla Road, Winter Springs, Seminole County, FL NORTHING EASTING STATION THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES BETWEEN SOIL TYPES. IN-SITU THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL. WL 5.5'WS WD BORING STARTED 10/08/18 CAVE IN DEPTH WL(SHW)4.5'WL(ACR)BORING COMPLETED 10/08/18 HAMMER TYPE Manual WL RIG ATV FOREMAN Gary DRILLING METHOD Mud RotaryDRILLING METHOD Mud Rotary DE P T H ( F T ) SA M P L E N O . SA M P L E T Y P E SA M P L E D I S T . ( I N ) RE C O V E R Y ( I N ) SURFACE ELEVATION DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL WA T E R L E V E L S EL E V A T I O N ( F T ) BL O W S / 6 " 10 20 30 40 50+ 20%40%60%80%100% 1 2 3 4 5+ ENGLISH UNITS BOTTOM OF CASING LOSS OF CIRCULATION CALIBRATED PENETROMETER TONS/FT2 PLASTIC LIMIT % WATER CONTENT % LIQUID LIMIT % ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION & RECOVERY RQD%REC.% STANDARD PENETRATION BLOWS/FT45' 1 OF 1 1395 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 S-5 S-6 S-7 SS SS SS SS SS SS SS 24 24 24 24 24 18 18 24 24 24 24 24 18 18 Topsoil Thickness [3.00"] (SP) SAND, light gray, moist, loose (SP-SM) SAND WITH SILT, dark brown, wet, loose to medium dense (SP) SAND, light gray, wet, medium dense END OF BORING @ 20' 3 2 3 3 4 3 3 5 4 4 5 7 6 7 8 7 6 6 5 8 7 7 9 6 7 10 5 6 9 15 11 16 17 CLIENT Equinox Development Properties, Inc. Job #: 24:6366 BORING # B-14 SHEET PROJECT NAME Tuskawilla Retail Development GEO ARCHITECT-ENGINEER Kimley Horn SITE LOCATION 170 Tuskawilla Road, Winter Springs, Seminole County, FL NORTHING EASTING STATION THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES BETWEEN SOIL TYPES. IN-SITU THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL. WL 5'WS WD BORING STARTED 10/08/18 CAVE IN DEPTH WL(SHW)4'WL(ACR)BORING COMPLETED 10/08/18 HAMMER TYPE Manual WL RIG ATV FOREMAN Gary DRILLING METHOD Mud RotaryDRILLING METHOD Mud Rotary DE P T H ( F T ) SA M P L E N O . SA M P L E T Y P E SA M P L E D I S T . ( I N ) RE C O V E R Y ( I N ) SURFACE ELEVATION DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL WA T E R L E V E L S EL E V A T I O N ( F T ) BL O W S / 6 " 10 20 30 40 50+ 20%40%60%80%100% 1 2 3 4 5+ ENGLISH UNITS BOTTOM OF CASING LOSS OF CIRCULATION CALIBRATED PENETROMETER TONS/FT2 PLASTIC LIMIT % WATER CONTENT % LIQUID LIMIT % ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION & RECOVERY RQD%REC.% STANDARD PENETRATION BLOWS/FT45.5' 1 OF 1 1396 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 40 35 30 25 20 15 S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 S-5 S-6 S-7 SS SS SS SS SS SS SS 24 24 24 24 24 18 18 24 24 24 24 24 18 18 Topsoil Thickness [3.00"] (SP) SAND, light gray, moist, loose (SP-SM) SAND WITH SILT, brown, wet, medium dense (SP) SAND, light gray, wet, medium dense END OF BORING @ 20' 2 3 2 2 5 4 4 6 5 6 5 7 6 7 5 8 6 8 7 7 6 5 7 5 8 7 5 8 11 22.4 12 15 12 15 CLIENT Equinox Development Properties, Inc. Job #: 24:6366 BORING # B-3 SHEET PROJECT NAME Tuskawilla Retail Development GEO ARCHITECT-ENGINEER Kimley Horn SITE LOCATION 170 Tuskawilla Road, Winter Springs, Seminole County, FL NORTHING EASTING STATION THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES BETWEEN SOIL TYPES. IN-SITU THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL. WL 4'WS WD BORING STARTED 10/08/18 CAVE IN DEPTH WL(SHW)3'WL(ACR)BORING COMPLETED 10/08/18 HAMMER TYPE Manual WL RIG ATV FOREMAN Gary DRILLING METHOD Mud RotaryDRILLING METHOD Mud Rotary DE P T H ( F T ) SA M P L E N O . SA M P L E T Y P E SA M P L E D I S T . ( I N ) RE C O V E R Y ( I N ) SURFACE ELEVATION DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL WA T E R L E V E L S EL E V A T I O N ( F T ) BL O W S / 6 " 10 20 30 40 50+ 20%40%60%80%100% 1 2 3 4 5+ ENGLISH UNITS BOTTOM OF CASING LOSS OF CIRCULATION CALIBRATED PENETROMETER TONS/FT2 PLASTIC LIMIT % WATER CONTENT % LIQUID LIMIT % ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION & RECOVERY RQD%REC.% STANDARD PENETRATION BLOWS/FT42.5' 1 OF 1 1397 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 40 35 30 25 20 15 S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 S-5 S-6 S-7 SS SS SS SS SS SS SS 24 24 24 24 24 18 18 24 24 24 24 24 18 18 Topsoil Thickness [3.00"] (SP) SAND, gray to light gray, moist, loose (SP-SM) SAND WITH SILT, brown, wet, medium dense (SP) SAND, light gray, wet, medium dense END OF BORING @ 20' 4 3 4 4 5 4 5 5 4 6 5 7 6 8 7 8 9 9 8 7 5 8 9 7 8 8 7 97.8 11 15 17 17 16 CLIENT Equinox Development Properties, Inc. Job #: 24:6366 BORING # B-2 SHEET PROJECT NAME Tuskawilla Retail Development GEO ARCHITECT-ENGINEER Kimley Horn SITE LOCATION 170 Tuskawilla Road, Winter Springs, Seminole County, FL NORTHING EASTING STATION THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES BETWEEN SOIL TYPES. IN-SITU THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL. WL 4.5'WS WD BORING STARTED 10/08/18 CAVE IN DEPTH WL(SHW)3.5'WL(ACR)BORING COMPLETED 10/08/18 HAMMER TYPE Manual WL RIG ATV FOREMAN Gary DRILLING METHOD Mud RotaryDRILLING METHOD Mud Rotary DE P T H ( F T ) SA M P L E N O . SA M P L E T Y P E SA M P L E D I S T . ( I N ) RE C O V E R Y ( I N ) SURFACE ELEVATION DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL WA T E R L E V E L S EL E V A T I O N ( F T ) BL O W S / 6 " 10 20 30 40 50+ 20%40%60%80%100% 1 2 3 4 5+ ENGLISH UNITS BOTTOM OF CASING LOSS OF CIRCULATION CALIBRATED PENETROMETER TONS/FT2 PLASTIC LIMIT % WATER CONTENT % LIQUID LIMIT % ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION & RECOVERY RQD%REC.% STANDARD PENETRATION BLOWS/FT43' 1 OF 1 1398 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 S-5 S-6 S-7 SS SS SS SS SS SS SS 24 24 24 24 24 18 18 24 24 24 24 24 18 18 Topsoil Thickness [3.00"] (SP) SAND, gray to light gray, moist, loose (SP-SM) SAND WITH SILT, brown, wet, medium dense (SP) SAND, gray, wet, medium dense END OF BORING @ 20' 3 2 3 3 4 3 4 5 4 6 5 7 6 8 9 8 9 9 10 9 6 7 9 8 8 8 5 7 11 17 19 16 23.2 16 CLIENT Equinox Development Properties, Inc. Job #: 24:6366 BORING # B-19 SHEET PROJECT NAME Tuskawilla Retail Development GEO ARCHITECT-ENGINEER Kimley Horn SITE LOCATION 170 Tuskawilla Road, Winter Springs, Seminole County, FL NORTHING EASTING STATION THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES BETWEEN SOIL TYPES. IN-SITU THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL. WL 5.5'WS WD BORING STARTED 10/08/18 CAVE IN DEPTH WL(SHW)5'WL(ACR)BORING COMPLETED 10/08/18 HAMMER TYPE Manual WL RIG ATV FOREMAN Gary DRILLING METHOD Mud RotaryDRILLING METHOD Mud Rotary DE P T H ( F T ) SA M P L E N O . SA M P L E T Y P E SA M P L E D I S T . ( I N ) RE C O V E R Y ( I N ) SURFACE ELEVATION DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL WA T E R L E V E L S EL E V A T I O N ( F T ) BL O W S / 6 " 10 20 30 40 50+ 20%40%60%80%100% 1 2 3 4 5+ ENGLISH UNITS BOTTOM OF CASING LOSS OF CIRCULATION CALIBRATED PENETROMETER TONS/FT2 PLASTIC LIMIT % WATER CONTENT % LIQUID LIMIT % ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION & RECOVERY RQD%REC.% STANDARD PENETRATION BLOWS/FT45' 1 OF 1 1399 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 S-5 S-6 S-7 SS SS SS SS SS SS SS 24 24 24 24 24 18 18 24 24 24 24 24 18 18 Topsoil Thickness [3.00"] (SP) SAND, light gray, moist, loose (SP-SM) SAND WITH SILT, brown, wet, medium dense to loose (SP) SAND, light gray, wet, medium dense END OF BORING @ 20' 3 4 5 4 4 5 5 4 6 5 7 7 8 7 5 6 5 5 4 5 5 7 10 6 6 7 9 10 12 12 23.4 9 17 13 CLIENT Equinox Development Properties, Inc. Job #: 24:6366 BORING # B-18 SHEET PROJECT NAME Tuskawilla Retail Development GEO ARCHITECT-ENGINEER Kimley Horn SITE LOCATION 170 Tuskawilla Road, Winter Springs, Seminole County, FL NORTHING EASTING STATION THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES BETWEEN SOIL TYPES. IN-SITU THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL. WL 5.5'WS WD BORING STARTED 10/08/18 CAVE IN DEPTH WL(SHW)5'WL(ACR)BORING COMPLETED 10/08/18 HAMMER TYPE Manual WL RIG ATV FOREMAN Gary DRILLING METHOD Mud RotaryDRILLING METHOD Mud Rotary DE P T H ( F T ) SA M P L E N O . SA M P L E T Y P E SA M P L E D I S T . ( I N ) RE C O V E R Y ( I N ) SURFACE ELEVATION DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL WA T E R L E V E L S EL E V A T I O N ( F T ) BL O W S / 6 " 10 20 30 40 50+ 20%40%60%80%100% 1 2 3 4 5+ ENGLISH UNITS BOTTOM OF CASING LOSS OF CIRCULATION CALIBRATED PENETROMETER TONS/FT2 PLASTIC LIMIT % WATER CONTENT % LIQUID LIMIT % ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION & RECOVERY RQD%REC.% STANDARD PENETRATION BLOWS/FT45.5' 1 OF 1 1400 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 S-5 SS SS SS SS SS 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 Topsoil Thickness [3.00"] (SP) SAND, light gray, moist, loose (SP-SM) SAND WITH SILT, brown, wet, medium dense END OF BORING @ 10' 4 4 3 5 2 4 3 4 4 6 5 7 6 8 7 9 6 8 7 10 7 7 2.1 11 15 15 CLIENT Equinox Development Properties, Inc. Job #: 24:6366 BORING # B-12 SHEET PROJECT NAME Tuskawilla Retail Development GEO ARCHITECT-ENGINEER Kimley Horn SITE LOCATION 170 Tuskawilla Road, Winter Springs, Seminole County, FL NORTHING EASTING STATION THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES BETWEEN SOIL TYPES. IN-SITU THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL. WL 5.5'WS WD BORING STARTED 10/08/18 CAVE IN DEPTH WL(SHW)4.5'WL(ACR)BORING COMPLETED 10/08/18 HAMMER TYPE Manual WL RIG ATV FOREMAN Gary DRILLING METHOD Mud RotaryDRILLING METHOD Mud Rotary DE P T H ( F T ) SA M P L E N O . SA M P L E T Y P E SA M P L E D I S T . ( I N ) RE C O V E R Y ( I N ) SURFACE ELEVATION DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL WA T E R L E V E L S EL E V A T I O N ( F T ) BL O W S / 6 " 10 20 30 40 50+ 20%40%60%80%100% 1 2 3 4 5+ ENGLISH UNITS BOTTOM OF CASING LOSS OF CIRCULATION CALIBRATED PENETROMETER TONS/FT2 PLASTIC LIMIT % WATER CONTENT % LIQUID LIMIT % ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION & RECOVERY RQD%REC.% STANDARD PENETRATION BLOWS/FT45' 1 OF 1 1401 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 40 35 30 25 20 15 S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 S-5 SS SS SS SS SS 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 Asphalt Thickness [2.00"] Limerock Thickness [5.00"] (SP) SAND, brown, moist, loose to medium dense (SP-SM) SAND WITH SILT, brown, moist to wet, loose END OF BORING @ 10' 4 4 5 4 4 6 5 6 5 5 5 7 4 4 4 5 5 4 4 6 9 11 10 13.8 8 8 CLIENT Equinox Development Properties, Inc. Job #: 24:6366 BORING # B-17 SHEET PROJECT NAME Tuskawilla Retail Development GEO ARCHITECT-ENGINEER Kimley Horn SITE LOCATION 170 Tuskawilla Road, Winter Springs, Seminole County, FL NORTHING EASTING STATION THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES BETWEEN SOIL TYPES. IN-SITU THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL. WL 5.5'WS WD BORING STARTED 10/08/18 CAVE IN DEPTH WL(SHW)4.5'WL(ACR)BORING COMPLETED 10/08/18 HAMMER TYPE Manual WL RIG ATV FOREMAN Gary DRILLING METHOD Mud RotaryDRILLING METHOD Mud Rotary DE P T H ( F T ) SA M P L E N O . SA M P L E T Y P E SA M P L E D I S T . ( I N ) RE C O V E R Y ( I N ) SURFACE ELEVATION DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL WA T E R L E V E L S EL E V A T I O N ( F T ) BL O W S / 6 " 10 20 30 40 50+ 20%40%60%80%100% 1 2 3 4 5+ ENGLISH UNITS BOTTOM OF CASING LOSS OF CIRCULATION CALIBRATED PENETROMETER TONS/FT2 PLASTIC LIMIT % WATER CONTENT % LIQUID LIMIT % ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION & RECOVERY RQD%REC.% STANDARD PENETRATION BLOWS/FT44' 1 OF 1 1402 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 40 35 30 25 20 15 S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 S-5 SS SS SS SS SS 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 Topsoil Thickness [3.00"] (SP) SAND, light gray, moist, loose (SP-SM) SAND WITH SILT, brown, wet, medium dense (SP) SAND, light gray, wet, loose END OF BORING @ 10' 3 2 4 3 6 5 5 7 5 5 6 5 7 7 8 7 6 5 4 7 6 10 11 15 9 CLIENT Equinox Development Properties, Inc. Job #: 24:6366 BORING # B-6 SHEET PROJECT NAME Tuskawilla Retail Development GEO ARCHITECT-ENGINEER Kimley Horn SITE LOCATION 170 Tuskawilla Road, Winter Springs, Seminole County, FL NORTHING EASTING STATION THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES BETWEEN SOIL TYPES. IN-SITU THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL. WL 4'WS WD BORING STARTED 10/08/18 CAVE IN DEPTH WL(SHW)3'WL(ACR)BORING COMPLETED 10/08/18 HAMMER TYPE Manual WL RIG ATV FOREMAN Gary DRILLING METHOD Mud RotaryDRILLING METHOD Mud Rotary DE P T H ( F T ) SA M P L E N O . SA M P L E T Y P E SA M P L E D I S T . ( I N ) RE C O V E R Y ( I N ) SURFACE ELEVATION DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL WA T E R L E V E L S EL E V A T I O N ( F T ) BL O W S / 6 " 10 20 30 40 50+ 20%40%60%80%100% 1 2 3 4 5+ ENGLISH UNITS BOTTOM OF CASING LOSS OF CIRCULATION CALIBRATED PENETROMETER TONS/FT2 PLASTIC LIMIT % WATER CONTENT % LIQUID LIMIT % ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION & RECOVERY RQD%REC.% STANDARD PENETRATION BLOWS/FT44.5' 1 OF 1 1403 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 S-5 SS SS SS SS SS 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 Topsoil Thickness [3.00"] (SP) SAND, light gray, moist, loose (SP-SM) SAND WITH SILT, dark brown, wet, medium dense (SP) SAND, light gray, wet, medium dense END OF BORING @ 10' 4 3 2 3 4 4 4 3 5 7 6 7 6 5 7 7 6 8 7 8 5 8 13 12 22.1 15 CLIENT Equinox Development Properties, Inc. Job #: 24:6366 BORING # B-11 SHEET PROJECT NAME Tuskawilla Retail Development GEO ARCHITECT-ENGINEER Kimley Horn SITE LOCATION 170 Tuskawilla Road, Winter Springs, Seminole County, FL NORTHING EASTING STATION THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES BETWEEN SOIL TYPES. IN-SITU THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL. WL 5'WS WD BORING STARTED 10/08/18 CAVE IN DEPTH WL(SHW)4'WL(ACR)BORING COMPLETED 10/08/18 HAMMER TYPE Manual WL RIG ATV FOREMAN Gary DRILLING METHOD Mud RotaryDRILLING METHOD Mud Rotary DE P T H ( F T ) SA M P L E N O . SA M P L E T Y P E SA M P L E D I S T . ( I N ) RE C O V E R Y ( I N ) SURFACE ELEVATION DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL WA T E R L E V E L S EL E V A T I O N ( F T ) BL O W S / 6 " 10 20 30 40 50+ 20%40%60%80%100% 1 2 3 4 5+ ENGLISH UNITS BOTTOM OF CASING LOSS OF CIRCULATION CALIBRATED PENETROMETER TONS/FT2 PLASTIC LIMIT % WATER CONTENT % LIQUID LIMIT % ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION & RECOVERY RQD%REC.% STANDARD PENETRATION BLOWS/FT45' 1 OF 1 1404 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 S-5 SS SS SS SS SS 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 Topsoil Thickness [3.00"] (SP) SAND, light gray, moist, loose (SP-SM) SAND WITH SILT, dark brown, wet, loose (SP) SAND, light gray, wet, medium dense to loose END OF BORING @ 10' 4 3 3 4 5 5 3 5 4 5 5 4 6 8 7 7 5 4 5 7 6 8 10 15 9 CLIENT Equinox Development Properties, Inc. Job #: 24:6366 BORING # B-8 SHEET PROJECT NAME Tuskawilla Retail Development GEO ARCHITECT-ENGINEER Kimley Horn SITE LOCATION 170 Tuskawilla Road, Winter Springs, Seminole County, FL NORTHING EASTING STATION THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES BETWEEN SOIL TYPES. IN-SITU THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL. WL 5'WS WD BORING STARTED 10/08/18 CAVE IN DEPTH WL(SHW)4'WL(ACR)BORING COMPLETED 10/08/18 HAMMER TYPE Manual WL RIG ATV FOREMAN Gary DRILLING METHOD Mud RotaryDRILLING METHOD Mud Rotary DE P T H ( F T ) SA M P L E N O . SA M P L E T Y P E SA M P L E D I S T . ( I N ) RE C O V E R Y ( I N ) SURFACE ELEVATION DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL WA T E R L E V E L S EL E V A T I O N ( F T ) BL O W S / 6 " 10 20 30 40 50+ 20%40%60%80%100% 1 2 3 4 5+ ENGLISH UNITS BOTTOM OF CASING LOSS OF CIRCULATION CALIBRATED PENETROMETER TONS/FT2 PLASTIC LIMIT % WATER CONTENT % LIQUID LIMIT % ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION & RECOVERY RQD%REC.% STANDARD PENETRATION BLOWS/FT45' 1 OF 1 1405 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 S-5 SS SS SS SS SS 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 Topsoil Thickness [3.00"] (SP) SAND, light gray, moist, loose (SP-SM) SAND WITH SILT, dark brown, wet, loose to medium dense END OF BORING @ 10' 2 5 4 3 3 5 4 6 6 5 5 5 6 5 9 7 8 7 9 9 9 9 10 14 16 CLIENT Equinox Development Properties, Inc. Job #: 24:6366 BORING # B-16 SHEET PROJECT NAME Tuskawilla Retail Development GEO ARCHITECT-ENGINEER Kimley Horn SITE LOCATION 170 Tuskawilla Road, Winter Springs, Seminole County, FL NORTHING EASTING STATION THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES BETWEEN SOIL TYPES. IN-SITU THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL. WL 5'WS WD BORING STARTED 10/08/18 CAVE IN DEPTH WL(SHW)4'WL(ACR)BORING COMPLETED 10/08/18 HAMMER TYPE Manual WL RIG ATV FOREMAN Gary DRILLING METHOD Mud RotaryDRILLING METHOD Mud Rotary DE P T H ( F T ) SA M P L E N O . SA M P L E T Y P E SA M P L E D I S T . ( I N ) RE C O V E R Y ( I N ) SURFACE ELEVATION DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL WA T E R L E V E L S EL E V A T I O N ( F T ) BL O W S / 6 " 10 20 30 40 50+ 20%40%60%80%100% 1 2 3 4 5+ ENGLISH UNITS BOTTOM OF CASING LOSS OF CIRCULATION CALIBRATED PENETROMETER TONS/FT2 PLASTIC LIMIT % WATER CONTENT % LIQUID LIMIT % ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION & RECOVERY RQD%REC.% STANDARD PENETRATION BLOWS/FT45' 1 OF 1 1406 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 40 35 30 25 20 15 S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 S-5 SS SS SS SS SS 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 Topsoil Thickness [3.00"] (SP) SAND, light gray, moist, loose (SP-SM) SAND WITH SILT, dark brown, wet, loose to medium dense END OF BORING @ 10' 4 3 3 4 3 2 4 3 4 4 5 4 5 7 6 7 6 5 7 7 6 6 9 13 12 CLIENT Equinox Development Properties, Inc. Job #: 24:6366 BORING # B-1 SHEET PROJECT NAME Tuskawilla Retail Development GEO ARCHITECT-ENGINEER Kimley Horn SITE LOCATION 170 Tuskawilla Road, Winter Springs, Seminole County, FL NORTHING EASTING STATION THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES BETWEEN SOIL TYPES. IN-SITU THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL. WL 4.5'WS WD BORING STARTED 10/08/18 CAVE IN DEPTH WL(SHW)3.5'WL(ACR)BORING COMPLETED 10/08/18 HAMMER TYPE Manual WL RIG ATV FOREMAN Gary DRILLING METHOD Mud RotaryDRILLING METHOD Mud Rotary DE P T H ( F T ) SA M P L E N O . SA M P L E T Y P E SA M P L E D I S T . ( I N ) RE C O V E R Y ( I N ) SURFACE ELEVATION DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL WA T E R L E V E L S EL E V A T I O N ( F T ) BL O W S / 6 " 10 20 30 40 50+ 20%40%60%80%100% 1 2 3 4 5+ ENGLISH UNITS BOTTOM OF CASING LOSS OF CIRCULATION CALIBRATED PENETROMETER TONS/FT2 PLASTIC LIMIT % WATER CONTENT % LIQUID LIMIT % ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION & RECOVERY RQD%REC.% STANDARD PENETRATION BLOWS/FT43.5' 1 OF 1 1407 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 40 35 30 25 20 15 S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 S-5 SS SS SS SS SS 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 Topsoil Thickness [3.00"] (SP) SAND, light gray, moist, loose (SP-SM) SAND WITH SILT, dark brown, wet, medium dense END OF BORING @ 10' 4 5 4 4 3 5 4 6 5 7 6 7 4 7 6 7 5 8 7 7 9 9 13 13 15 CLIENT Equinox Development Properties, Inc. Job #: 24:6366 BORING # B-7 SHEET PROJECT NAME Tuskawilla Retail Development GEO ARCHITECT-ENGINEER Kimley Horn SITE LOCATION 170 Tuskawilla Road, Winter Springs, Seminole County, FL NORTHING EASTING STATION THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES BETWEEN SOIL TYPES. IN-SITU THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL. WL 4.5'WS WD BORING STARTED 10/08/18 CAVE IN DEPTH WL(SHW)4'WL(ACR)BORING COMPLETED 10/08/18 HAMMER TYPE Manual WL RIG ATV FOREMAN Gary DRILLING METHOD Mud RotaryDRILLING METHOD Mud Rotary DE P T H ( F T ) SA M P L E N O . SA M P L E T Y P E SA M P L E D I S T . ( I N ) RE C O V E R Y ( I N ) SURFACE ELEVATION DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL WA T E R L E V E L S EL E V A T I O N ( F T ) BL O W S / 6 " 10 20 30 40 50+ 20%40%60%80%100% 1 2 3 4 5+ ENGLISH UNITS BOTTOM OF CASING LOSS OF CIRCULATION CALIBRATED PENETROMETER TONS/FT2 PLASTIC LIMIT % WATER CONTENT % LIQUID LIMIT % ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION & RECOVERY RQD%REC.% STANDARD PENETRATION BLOWS/FT44.5' 1 OF 1 1408 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 S-5 SS SS SS SS SS 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 Topsoil Thickness [3.00"] (SP) SAND, light gray, moist, loose (SP-SM) SAND WITH SILT, dark brown, wet, medium dense END OF BORING @ 10' 3 3 2 4 5 4 5 5 4 6 5 7 6 8 7 7 6 9 7 9 5 9 11 15 16 CLIENT Equinox Development Properties, Inc. Job #: 24:6366 BORING # B-13 SHEET PROJECT NAME Tuskawilla Retail Development GEO ARCHITECT-ENGINEER Kimley Horn SITE LOCATION 170 Tuskawilla Road, Winter Springs, Seminole County, FL NORTHING EASTING STATION THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES BETWEEN SOIL TYPES. IN-SITU THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL. WL 4'WS WD BORING STARTED 10/08/18 CAVE IN DEPTH WL(SHW)3.5'WL(ACR)BORING COMPLETED 10/08/18 HAMMER TYPE Manual WL RIG ATV FOREMAN Gary DRILLING METHOD Mud RotaryDRILLING METHOD Mud Rotary DE P T H ( F T ) SA M P L E N O . SA M P L E T Y P E SA M P L E D I S T . ( I N ) RE C O V E R Y ( I N ) SURFACE ELEVATION DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL WA T E R L E V E L S EL E V A T I O N ( F T ) BL O W S / 6 " 10 20 30 40 50+ 20%40%60%80%100% 1 2 3 4 5+ ENGLISH UNITS BOTTOM OF CASING LOSS OF CIRCULATION CALIBRATED PENETROMETER TONS/FT2 PLASTIC LIMIT % WATER CONTENT % LIQUID LIMIT % ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION & RECOVERY RQD%REC.% STANDARD PENETRATION BLOWS/FT45' 1 OF 1 1409 B-1 6 6 9 13 12 END OF BORING @ 10' SP SP-SM B-2 7 9 11 15 17 17 16 END OF BORING @ 20' SP SP-SM SP B-3 5 8 11 12 15 12 15 END OF BORING @ 20' SP SP-SM SP B-4 6 7 10 12 15 14 16 END OF BORING @ 20' SP SP-SM SP 44 40 36 32 28 24 20 El e v a t i o n i n F e e t 44 40 36 32 28 24 20 El e v a t i o n i n F e e t 100 200 300 400 500 Subsurface Soil Profile Cross Section A-A NOTES: 1 SEE INDIVIDUAL BORING LOG AND GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 2 PENETRATION TEST RESISTANCE IN BLOWS PER FOOT (ASTM D1586). Tuskawilla Retail Development GEO Equinox Development Properties, Inc. 170 Tuskawilla Rd, Winter Springs, Seminole County, FL PROJECT NO.:6366 DATE:11/14/2018 VERTICAL SCALE:1"=4' 1410 B-9 5 9 9 12 15 16 15 END OF BORING @ 20' SP SP-SM SP B-12 7 7 11 15 15 END OF BORING @ 10' SP SP-SM B-15 9 9 9 15 15 16 18 END OF BORING @ 20' SP SP-SM SP B-16 9 9 10 14 16 END OF BORING @ 10' SP SP-SM B-19 5 7 11 17 19 16 16 END OF BORING @ 20' SP SP-SM SP B-18 9 10 12 12 9 17 13 END OF BORING @ 20' SP SP-SM SP 48 44 40 36 32 28 24 El e v a t i o n i n F e e t 48 44 40 36 32 28 24 El e v a t i o n i n F e e t 100 200 300 400 500 Subsurface Soil Profile Cross Section B-B NOTES: 1 SEE INDIVIDUAL BORING LOG AND GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 2 PENETRATION TEST RESISTANCE IN BLOWS PER FOOT (ASTM D1586). Tuskawilla Retail Development GEO Equinox Development Properties, Inc. 170 Tuskawilla Rd, Winter Springs, Seminole County, FL PROJECT NO.:6366 DATE:11/14/2018 VERTICAL SCALE:1"=4' 1411 B-5 8 9 11 15 15 17 16 END OF BORING @ 20' SP SP-SM SP B-7 9 9 13 13 15 END OF BORING @ 10' SP SP-SM B-10 7 9 12 13 13 14 15 END OF BORING @ 20' SP SP-SM SP B-13 5 9 11 15 16 END OF BORING @ 10' SP SP-SM B-14 5 6 9 15 11 16 17 END OF BORING @ 20' SP SP-SM SP 48 44 40 36 32 28 24 El e v a t i o n i n F e e t 48 44 40 36 32 28 24 El e v a t i o n i n F e e t 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 Subsurface Soil Profile Cross Section C-C NOTES: 1 SEE INDIVIDUAL BORING LOG AND GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 2 PENETRATION TEST RESISTANCE IN BLOWS PER FOOT (ASTM D1586). Tuskawilla Retail Development GEO Equinox Development Properties, Inc. 170 Tuskawilla Rd, Winter Springs, Seminole County, FL PROJECT NO.:6366 DATE:11/14/2018 VERTICAL SCALE:1"=4' 1412 Tuskawilla Retail Development Revised December 15, 2020 ECS Project No. 24:6366 APPENDIX C – Laboratory Testing Laboratory Testing Results Summary 1413 B-3 S-3 4.00 - 6.00 22.4 SP-SM 5.8 B-2 S-2 2.00 - 4.00 7.8 SP 2.7 B-19 S-6 13.50 - 15.00 23.2 SP 1.7 B-18 S-4 6.00 - 8.00 23.4 SP-SM 5.1 B-12 S-2 2.00 - 4.00 2.1 SP 0.7 B-17 S-3 4.00 - 6.00 13.8 SP-SM 8.9 B-11 S-4 6.00 - 8.00 22.1 SP 0.9 Laboratory Testing Summary Notes:1. ASTM D 2216, 2. ASTM D 2487, 3. ASTM D 4318, 4. ASTM D 1140, 5. See test reports for test method, 6. See test reports for test method Definitions:MC: Moisture Content, Soil Type: USCS (Unified Soil Classification System), LL: Liquid Limit, PL: Plastic Limit, PI: Plasticity Index, CBR: California Bearing Ratio, OC: Organic Content (ASTM D 2974) Project No.24:6366 Project Name: Tuskawilla Retail Development GEO PM:DAS PE:JPH Printed On:Tuesday, November 13, 2018 Sample Source Sample Number Depth (feet) MC1 (%) Soil Type2 LL Atterberg Limits3 PL PI Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve4 Maximum Density (pcf) Moisture - Density (Corr.)5 Optimum Moisture (%) CBR Value6 Other Page 1 of 1 Kv = 34 ft/day Kh = 55 ft/day Kv = 37 ft/day Kh = 51 ft/day 1414 THIRD MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Tuscawilla Property Investors, LLC Page 1 of 11 THIS INSTRUMENT WAS PREPARED BY AND SHOULD BE RETURNED TO: Anthony A. Garganese City Attorney of Winter Springs Garganese, Weiss, D'Agresta & Salzman, P.A. 111 N. Orange Avenue, Suite 2000 Orlando, FL 32802 (407) 425-9566 THIRD MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT AND PROPERTY DIVISION AGREEMENT (Winter Springs Marketplace – Additional Parking and Modifications to Robert Family Lane) THIS THIRD MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT AND PROPERTY DIVISION AGREEMENT (“Third Modification”) is made and executed this ______ day of _________________, 2025, by and between the CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, a Florida Municipal Corporation (“City”), whose address is 1126 East S.R. 434, Winter Springs, Florida 32708, and THISTLEWOOD WINTER SPRINGS, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, whose address is 677 King Street, 3rd Floor, Charleston, SC 29403 and WINTER SPRINGS NET, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, whose address is 6525 3rd Street, Suite 409, Rockledge, Florida 32955 (collectively “Owners”). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Owners’ predecessor in interest, Tuscawilla Property Investors, LLC, and the City entered into and executed that certain Development and Property Division Agreement for Winter Springs Marketplace, dated March 8, 2021, and recorded in the Official Records of Seminole County at Book 9887, Pages 718-751 (the “Development Agreement”) as well as that certain First Modification to the Development and Property Division Agreement for Winter Springs Marketplace, dated January 30, 2023, and recorded in the Official Records of Seminole County at Book 10397, Pages 628-643 (the “First Modification”), and that certain Second Modification to the Development and Property Division Agreement for Winter Springs Marketplace, dated __________, and recorded in the Official Records of Seminole County at Book _________, Pages _____________ (the “Second Modification”); and WHEREAS, the Development Agreement governs the development of the Winter Springs Marketplace shopping center, consisting of both the Property and Trust Property, as legally described and defined therein, the Trust Property having been conveyed to Tuscawilla Property FOR RECORDING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY 1415 THIRD MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Tuscawilla Property Investors, LLC Page 2 of 11 Investors subsequent to the execution and recordation of the Development Agreement, and the Trust Property being more particularly described in Exhibit “D” of the Development Agreement ; and WHEREAS, the Property and Trust Property have been subdivided and are no longer entirely owned by Tuscawilla Property Investors, LLC; and WHEREAS, as described in the Second Modification, Tuscawilla Property Investors, LLC, desires to construct a Wawa neighborhood convenience store with gas pumps on the Resulting Trust Property Parcel #2, as more particularly described in Exhibit “G” of the Second Modification; and WHEREAS, Tuscawilla Property Investors, LLC, as authorized by the Owners, further desires to modify the existing parking area of the Winter Springs Marketplace development by adding an additional 10 parking spaces which will be available to service the proposed Wawa development located upon the Resulting Trust Property Parcel #2, and by remodeling a portion of Roberts Family Lane which services the Property and Trust Property, as more particularly described and depicted on Exhibit “J,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (hereinafter the “Parking and Access Improvements”); and WHEREAS, the Parking and Access Improvements are located on a portion of the Property within the Winter Springs Marketplace now owned by the Owners; and WHEREAS, Section 20-29(c) of the City Code requires that all site plans shall be binding on the use of the subject property; and WHEREAS, this Third Modification shall be recorded against a portion of the Property described herein so that the terms and conditions of approval shall run with the land; and NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties mutually agree as follows: 1.0 Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated herein by this reference. 2.0 Authority. This Third Modification is entered into pursuant to the Florida Municipal Home Rule Powers Act. 3.0 The Project Area. The real property that is the subject of this Third Modification is legally described in EXHIBIT “I,” attached hereto and fully incorporated herein by this reference for convenience (the “Improvements Project Area”). 4.0 Project Description and Requirements; Phasing. Tuscawilla Property Investors has constructed Phases I and II of the Winter Springs Marketplace shopping center on the Property, as well as supporting infrastructure, stormwater pond, parking lots, and landscaping. Owners intend to construct certain improvements, consisting of ten (10) additional parking spaces in the 1416 THIRD MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Tuscawilla Property Investors, LLC Page 3 of 11 Improvements Project Area and certain improvements to Roberts Family Lane, as depicted in Exhibit “J.” (Hereinafter, all project description and requirements and references to the “Parking and Access Improvements” shall refer to the additional parking spaces and the associated improvements to Roberts Family Lane). Owners shall construct the Parking and Access Improvements in a manner consistent with the approved Final Engineering/Site Plans that are on file with the City with the following file numbers and consistent with the requirements contained in this Third Modification: File Nos: FEDP-2025-0017. FINAL ENGINEERING/SITE PLAN. The overall Final Engineering/Site Plan for the Parking and Access Improvements is attached hereto as EXHIBIT “J” for convenience and incorporated herein by this reference. 5.0 Conditions of Approval. Specific conditions of approval for the above-referenced Final Engineering Plans include the following, which are also addressed in the staff report for the Final Engineering/Site Plans: a. All grass areas in the Improvements Project Area shall use Bahia grass. No St. Augustine grass or any grass type with low drought tolerance shall be permitted. b. Construction of the Parking and Access Improvements shall not commence until appropriate permitting has been obtained from the St. Johns River Water Management District, to the extent required. 6.0 Termination of Approval as to Parking and Access Improvements. In the event the Owners or their authorized agents fail to obtain the building permit and substantially commence construction of the Parking and Access Improvements within two (2) years of the Effective Date of this Third Modification, then the City shall have the right to terminate and/or void the approvals set forth herein and require the Owners to reapply to the City. The Owners may apply to the City Commission for an extension of this deadline, which may be granted upon good cause shown. 7.0 Representations of the Parties. The City and Owners hereby each represent and warrant to the other that it has the power and authority to execute, deliver and perform the terms and provisions of this Third Modification and has taken all necessary action to authorize the execution, delivery and performance of this Third Modification. The Owners further agrees and make the following representations and warranties to the City: A. The Owners are lawfully seized of the Improvements Project Area property in fee simple and has full and lawful authority to execute this Third Modification and bind the Improvements Project Area property as set forth herein. 1417 THIRD MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Tuscawilla Property Investors, LLC Page 4 of 11 This Third Modification will, when duly executed and delivered by the City and Owners, constitute a legal, valid and binding obligation enforceable against the parties hereto. Upon recording of this Third Modification in the Public Records of Seminole County, Florida, the Third Modification shall be a binding obligation upon the Improvements Project Area property in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Owners represent that it has voluntarily and willfully executed this Third Modification for purposes of binding himself and the Project Area property to the terms and conditions set forth in this Third Modification. 8.0 Successors and Assigns. This Third Modification shall automatically be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the City and Owners and their respective successors and assigns. The terms and conditions of this Third Modification similarly shall be binding upon the Improvements Project Area property, and shall run with title to the same upon being duly recorded against the Improvements Project Area property by the City. 9.0 Effective Date. This Third Modification shall become effective upon approval by the City Commission and execution by all parties hereto. 10.0 Recordation. Upon full execution by the Parties, this Third Modification shall be recorded in the Public Records of Seminole County, Florida by the City and shall be binding upon the Improvements Project Area property and all future owners thereof. 11.0 Effect of Modification. All other terms and conditions of the Development Agreement, First Modification, and Second Modification not in conflict with this Third Modification, shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands and seal on the date first above written. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS By: Kevin McCann, Mayor ATTEST: By: Christian Gowan, City Clerk Date: _______________________________ CITY SEAL APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY For the use and reliance of the City of Winter Springs, Florida only. 1418 THIRD MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Tuscawilla Property Investors, LLC Page 5 of 11 Date: By: Anthony A. Garganese, City Attorney for the City of Winter Springs, Florida STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF SEMINOLE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of (___) physical presence or (___) online notarization, this ______ day of ___________, 2025, by Kevin McCann, Mayor of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, a Florida municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation, who is personally known to me or produced ___________________ _______________ as identification. (NOTARY SEAL) (Notary Public Signature) (Print Name) Notary Public, State of Commission No.: My Commission Expires: ________________ Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of the following witnesses: Signature of Witness Printed Name of Witness Signature of Witness Printed Name of Witness WINTER SPRINGS NET, LLC By: Print Name:______________________________ Date: _______________ STATE OF COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of (___) physical presence or (___) online notarization, this ______ day of ___________, 2025, by _______________, the Manager of Winter Springs Net, LLC, a limited liability company, on 1419 THIRD MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Tuscawilla Property Investors, LLC Page 6 of 11 behalf of the company, who is personally known to me or produced ___________________ _______________ as identification. (NOTARY SEAL) (Notary Public Signature) (Print Name) Notary Public, State of Commission No.: My Commission Expires: Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of the following witnesses: Signature of Witness Printed Name of Witness Signature of Witness Printed Name of Witness THISTLEWOOD WINTER SPRINGS, LLC By: Print Name:______________________________ Date: _______________ STATE OF COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of (___) physical presence or (___) online notarization, this ______ day of ___________, 2025, by _______________, the Manager of Thistlewood Winter Springs, LLC, a limited liability company, on behalf of the company, who is personally known to me or produced ___________________ _______________ as identification. (NOTARY SEAL) (Notary Public Signature) (Print Name) Notary Public, State of Commission No.: My Commission Expires: OWNERS ARE HEREBY ADVISED THAT SHOULD OWNERS FAIL TO FULLY EXECUTE, AND DELIVER TO THE CITY, THIS AGREEMENT WITHIN THIRTY (30) 1420 THIRD MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Tuscawilla Property Investors, LLC Page 7 of 11 DAYS FROM THE DATE THAT THE CITY COMMISSION APPROVES THIS AGREEMENT, THIS AGREEMENT, AND THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPROVALS REFERENCED HEREUNDER, SHALL AUTOMATICALLY BE DEEMED NULL AND VOID. 1421 THIRD MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Tuscawilla Property Investors, LLC Page 8 of 11 EXHIBIT I LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT AREA Lots 1, 3, and Tract C of the Winter Springs Marketplace plat, recorded in the Plat Book of Seminole County, Book 88, Page 5. 1422 THIRD MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Tuscawilla Property Investors, LLC Page 9 of 11 EXHIBIT J OVERALL SITE PLAN FOR PARKING AND ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS 1423 THIRD MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Tuscawilla Property Investors, LLC Page 10 of 11 JOINDER AND CONSENT For and in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms, and conditions and restrictions contained herein, together with other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, One Florida Bank, a Florida banking corporation, as holder of that certain Mortgage and Security Agreement, which is recorded in Official Records Book 10171, Page 569 of the Public Records of Seminole County, Florida, as modified or affected by that certain Assignment of Leases and Rents, recorded in Official Records Book 10171, Page 585, that certain First Modification of Mortgage and Assignment of Leases and Rents, recorded in Official Records Book 10435, Page 458, that certain UCC-1 Financing Statement recorded in Official Records Book 10171, Page 593, and that certain UCC-1 Financing Statement Amendment, which is recorded in Official Records Book 10435, Page 461, and that certain Notice Pursuant to Florida Statutes, Section 713.10, recorded in Official Records Book 10435, Page 464, all of the Public Records of Seminole County, Florida (collectively, the “Mortgage”,) hereby joins in and consents to the foregoing Third Modification to the Development and Property Division Agreement by and between the City of Winter Springs, a Florida municipal corporation, and Thistlewood Winter Springs, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, and Winter Springs Net, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, and further acknowledges and agrees that its Mortgage shall be subordinated to such Third Modification to the Development and Property Division Agreement and the obligations contained therein. Dated this _______ day of ______, 2025. 1424 THIRD MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Tuscawilla Property Investors, LLC Page 11 of 11 Signed and sealed in the presence of: Print Name: Address: ____________________________ Print Name: By: ___________________________________ Name: Title : Address: ______________________________ STATE OF COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of (___) physical presence or (___) online notarization, this ______ day of ___________, 2025, by __________, the _____________ of _____________________, a _______________, on behalf of the company, who is personally known to me or produced ___________________ _______________ as identification. (NOTARY SEAL) (Notary Public Signature) (Print Name) Notary Public, State of Commission No.: My Commission Expires: 1425 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 customerservice@winterspringsfl.org Application – Site Plan Review 01/2024 Page 1 of 3 The Community Development Director reserves the right to determine whether this application is complete and accurate. An incomplete application will not be processed and will be returned to the applicant. The application shall be reviewed per Florida Statue 419.001. Applications shall be reviewed for sufficiency (completeness) within thirty (30) calendar days per FL Statue 166.033. By submitting this application, you hereby grant temporary right of entry for City officials to enter upon the subject property for purposes of evaluating this application. Site Plan Type Type of Development: Residential Non-Residential Preliminary Review Final Review Combined Preliminary/Final Resubmittal Recorded Plat Project Name: Date: Applicant/Agent Information Applicant(s): Mailing Address: Email: Phone Number: Person Who Will Upload Plans: Email: Phone#: Property Owner(s) Name (If Applicant is not the Property Owner) Name: Email: Phone #: Mailing Address: Phone Number: Site Information Project Address: Parcel ID(s): Parcel Size: Existing Use: Proposed Use: Zoning District: Future Land Use: X Cory Sitler 407-536-4440cory.sitler@kimley-horn.com Northwest corner of FL-434 & Tuskawilla Rd 36-20-30-502-0000-0090 1.21 Acres Commerical Commerical T-5 Urban Ceneter Commerical Wawa At Winter Springs Marketplace Tuscawilla Property Investors, LLC RStahl@equinox-development.com 630 South Maitland Avenue, Suite 1000, Maitland FL 32751 (407) 628-0077 X 5/13/2025 Commercial Commercial Commercial Winter Springs Marketplace - Additional Parking 0.12 1426 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 customerservice@winterspringsfl.org Application – Site Plan Review 01/2024 Page 2 of 3 Is the property located in the Town Center District? _____Yes _____No Is the property within the S.R. 434 Corridor Overlay District? _____Yes _____No Is the property located in the Greeneway Interchange Zoning District? _____Yes _____No The Planning and Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency shall review Site Plan Applications and make a written recommendation to the City Commission. The City Commission shall render all final decisions regarding Preliminary and Final Engineering Plans and may impose reasonable conditions on any approved plans to the extent deemed necessary and relevant to ensure compliance with applicable criteria and other applicable provisions of the City Code and Comprehensive Plan. All formal decisions shall be based upon the applicable criteria as set forth in the City’s Code of Ordinances Chapter 9, Land Development and Chapter 20, Zoning. Applicants are advised, that if they decide to appeal any decisions made at the meetings or hearings, with respect to any matter considered at the meetings or hearings, they will need a record of the proceedings and, for such purposes, they will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, at their cost, which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based, per 286.0105, Florida Statutes. Application Fees Fees are as reflected on the Fee Schedule plus actual costs incurred for advertising or notification, and reimbursement for technical, and/or professional services which may be required in connection with the review, inspection, or approval of any development (based on accounting submitted by the City Consultant), payable prior to approval of the pertinent stage of development. X X X 1427 14 2 8 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 customerservice@winterspringsfl.org Application – Development Agreement 01/2024 Page 1 of 4 The Community Development Director reserves the right to determine whether this application is complete and accurate. An incomplete application will not be processed and will be returned to the applicant. The application shall be reviewed per all applicable City Codes and the City Comprehensive Plan. Applications shall be reviewed for sufficiency (completeness) within thirty (30) calendar days per FL Statue 166.033. Once the application is deemed sufficient, the applicant shall move forward with the Community Workshop, required per Chapter 20–Zoning Sec.20-29.1. All applicants shall be afforded minimal due process as required by law, including the right to receive notice, be heard, present evidence, cross-examine witnesses, and be represented by a duly authorized representative. Applicants are further advised that a Development Agreement is quasi-judicial in nature. Therefore, APPLICANT ACKNOWLEDGES and AGREES, by signing below, that he or she: • May be sworn-in as a witness in order to provide testimony to the City Commission; • Shall be subject to cross-examination by party intervenors (if requested); and • Shall be required to qualify expert witnesses, as appropriate. Applicants are encouraged to familiarize themselves with Chapter 2 – Administration Sec. 2-30 of the Winter Springs City Code relating to Quasi-Judicial Rules and Procedures of the City Commission. All Development Agreement recommendations shall be based from the required information/documentation provided, the Winter Springs Code of Ordinances, and the Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan (to the extent applicable). The City Commission (CC) shall render all final decisions regarding Development Agreements and may impose reasonable conditions on any approved Development Agreement to the extent deemed necessary and relevant to ensure compliance with applicable criteria and other applicable provisions of the Winter Springs Code of Ordinances and the Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan. REQUIRED INFORMATION Applicant(s): Applicant Signature: Date: Mailing address: Email: Phone Number: Property Owner(s): Mailing Address: Email: Phone Number: 7/21/2025 Tuscawilla Property Investors, LLC 630 South Maitland Avenue, Suite 100, Maitland FL 32751 RStahl@equinox-development.com (407) 628-0077 Tuscawilla Property Investors, LLC 630 South Maitland Avenue, Suite 100, Maitland FL 32751 RStahl@equinox-development.com (407) 628-0077 1429 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 customerservice@winterspringsfl.org Application – Development Agreement 01/2024 Page 2 of 4 Property Address: Parcel ID(s): Parcel Size: Project Name: A general description of the relief sought under this division. A brief explanation, with applicable supporting competent substantial evidence and documents, as to why the application satisfies the relevant criteria set forth in the City Zoning Code and City Comprehensive Plan. List all witnesses that the applicant intends to present to the City Commission to provide testimony: Describe with specificity any evidence which the applicant intends to present to the City Commission, including oral factual testimony, maps, photographs, records or reports and/or expert testimony: Attach all documentary evidence which the applicant intends to present to the city commission to the back of this application. The Applicant has a continuing duty to update the list of witnesses, description of evidence, and documentary evidence throughout the application process. Additional witnesses or evidence will not be admitted at the city commission hearing if not submitted at least seven (7) days prior to such hearing Northwest corner of FL-434 & Tuskawilla Rd 01-21-30-5VK-0C00-0000 0.12 Acres Wawa At Winter Springs Marketplace The request is to revise the Development Agreement to incorporate the development of parcel 01-21-30-5VK-0C00-0000 per the plans submitted under FDEP-2025-0017. Cory Sitler and Ryan Stahl Photos (if needed) This project satisfies the review criteria as proposed under the conditional use, waivers, and aesthetic applications that are currently under review. 1430 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 customerservice@winterspringsfl.org Application – Development Agreement 01/2024 Page 3 of 4 REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION ___ A complete Application and Fee ___ An Electronic copy of the most recent survey of the subject property. ___ An Electronic copy of the Legal Description of the subject property. ___ Documentation and Data supporting the request. X X X X 1431 14 3 2 Winter Springs Marketplace Additional Parking John Rabon, J.D., M.P.A Senior Planner City Commission 1433 Background COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Property Address: 180 Tuskawilla Road (± 1.22 acres) May 6, 2025: Preapplication Meeting (PREM-2025-0022) May 9, 2025: Site Plan Application (FEDP-2025-0017) July 21, 2025: Development Agreement Application (DVAG-2025- 0011) July 29, 2025: Public Notice Letters and Signage Applicant: Tuskawilla Property Investors, LLC October 13, 2025 AGENDA ITEM 401 City Commission Wi n t e r S p r i n g s M a r k e t p l a c e A d d i t i o n a l Pa r k i n g FE D P -20 2 5 -00 1 7 1434 Background COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTOctober 13, 2025 AGENDA ITEM 401 City Commission •Located at 180 Tuskawilla Rd. •Proposal is to add ten (10) additional parking spaces as well as an entrance to the Winter Springs Marketplace off of Roberts Family Ln. •Property is zoned Town Center District, T-5 Transect. •Applicant has submitted a Final Engineering/Site Plan application and a Development Agreement Application. Wi n t e r S p r i n g s M a r k e t p l a c e A d d i t i o n a l Pa r k i n g FE D P -20 2 5 -00 1 7 1435 Site Plan AGENDA ITEM 400 Planning & Zoning Board October 13, 2025 AGENDA ITEM 401 City Commission Wi n t e r S p r i n g s M a r k e t p l a c e A d d i t i o n a l Pa r k i n g FE D P -20 2 5 -00 1 7 1436 Proposed Conditions COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Staff recommends the Planning & Zoning Board approve FEDP-2025-0017 with the following conditions: 1.Execution of the Development Agreement. 2.Construction on the site shall not begin until the stormwater permit from St. Johns River Water Management District is approved. 3.All grass on the Property shall be Bahia grass. No St. Augustine grass or grass types with low drought tolerance shall be permitted. Note: A Right-of-Way Permit will be required for work on Roberts Family Lane. AGENDA ITEM 401 City Commission October 13, 2025 Wi n t e r S p r i n g s M a r k e t p l a c e A d d i t i o n a l Pa r k i n g FE D P -20 2 5 -00 1 7 1437 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTOctober 13, 2025 AGENDA ITEM 401 City Commission ANY QUESTIONS? Wi n t e r S p r i n g s M a r k e t p l a c e A d d i t i o n a l Pa r k i n g FE D P -20 2 5 -00 1 7 1438