HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025 05 12 Consent 302 - Winter Springs Wastewater Treatment FacilitiesCONSENT AGENDA ITEM 302
CITY COMMISSION AGENDA | MAY 12, 2025 REGULAR MEETING
TITLE
Winter Springs Wastewater Treatment Facilities - East Plant Preconstruction Services
SUMMARY
The City is moving forward with critical improvements to its East and West Wastewater
Treatment Facilities to address aging infrastructure and meet future regulatory
requirements. The City has selected Wharton-Smith through a qualifications-based
selection process to serve as the Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) for the project
(RFQ #08-24-04 PH). This agenda item seeks approval to authorize pre-construction
services, which include, but are not limited to, constructability reviews, value
engineering, cost estimating, and schedule development. These services are essential
to finalizing the project design, securing the required funding, and preparing for the
subsequent construction phase. The duration of preconstruction is estimated to be 11
months for a total fee of $585,346.00 for design coordination and development of a
Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP). Any change order(s) related to preconstruction
services, resulting in an increase in the total fee above the amount referenced in this
agenda item (if any), will be subject to the Commission's approval.
Staff is also requesting the Commission delegate the approval and execution of the
CMAR contract with Wharton Smith to the City Manager provided the form of the
contract is deemed acceptable to the City Attorney. Under the CMAR process, the
CMAR Contract will require that the Contractor work with Staff to prepare a
Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) for construction that will be presented to the City
Commission for final approval at a future Commission meeting.
FUNDING SOURCE
This funding will be appropriated from the assigned transfer for Sewer Infrastructure
Improvements in the Water and Sewer Fund.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Commission authorize the City Manager to execute an
Agreement with Wharton-Smith for Preconstruction Services in the amount of
$585,346.00 in a form approved by the City Attorney.
51
WHARTON-SMITH, INC.
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES – EAST PLANT
PRECONSTRUCTION SCOPE OF SERVICES
The following narrative is to provide detail to the Preconstruction Services Scope for City of Winter Springs
Wastewater Treatment Facility – East Plant.
The duration of preconstruction is assumed to be approximately 11 months for design coordination and
GMP development which is inclusive of preconstruction services provided by Wharton-Smith, and 2 months
for production and negotiation of the final Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP). This time is based on
receiving GMP design documents from Carollo by December 1st, 2025. Please note that the 2 months
allotted for the GMP does not include the time required for City of Winter Springs Council approval and
contract amendment.
Generally:
Attend general progress review and coordination meetings with Owner and the project team.
Attend periodic design meetings to provide consultation on aspects of the design and construction that will
impact the budget, schedule, and quality of the completed Work.
1. CMAR will work with Owner to develop the optimum scope and quality of Work to meet Owner’s
budget. Such work will consist of considering options and alternates with scope and quality
adjustments as determined by Owner. CMAR will assess cost and schedule impact of these options
and alternates.
2. Consult with Owner regarding site use and improvements, and the selection of materials, building
systems, and equipment.
3. Provide recommendations on construction feasibility; actions designed to minimize adverse effects
of labor or material shortages; time requirements for procurement, installation and construction
completion; and factors related to construction cost including estimates of alternative designs or
materials, preliminary budgets and possible opportunities for savings.
4. Provide recommendations on the construction schedule for possible opportunities for time savings.
Provide input to the Owner regarding current construction market, bidding climate, status of key
Subcontractor and Supplier markets, and other local economic conditions. Develop Subcontractor and
Supplier interest in the Work, consistent with Legal Requirements. Furnish the Owner with a list of possible
Subcontractors and Suppliers, from whom bids will be requested for each principal portion of the Work.
Submission of this list is for information and discussion purposes only and not for prequalification.
52
WHARTON-SMITH, INC.
In conjunction with the Owner, identify the appropriate early work packages including procurement of
long-lead time items and equipment and other Work required to meet the schedule for the Owner.
In conjunction with the Owner, identify the appropriate Work packages from the Contract Documents for
distribution to prospective bidders for providing all elements of Work not included in the General
Conditions. Appropriate Work packages shall generally mean scopes of work that will maximize the
competition for those Work packages. Work packages will also be identified with appropriate scopes of
work should the Owner have any goals for involvement of the local and/or small contracting communities.
The following breakdown lists the anticipated tasks and expectations considered when producing the
preconstruction proposal. Any work outside of this scope of work that is requested of Wharton-Smith by
the Owner, shall be submitted in the form of a ‘Request for Quotation’ for review and approval prior to
such work taking place.
This list of tasks may differ from the original task list in the RFQ solicitation, this scope was generated jointly
with the City, Carollo, and Wharton-Smith based on the most effective use of resources to achieve the goals
of the project.
Task 1 Project Coordination
1.1 Project Kickoff Meeting – Wharton-Smith staff will attend one (1) project kickoff workshops with
City of Winter Springs and Carollo. These meetings will be workshop style meetings to review
drawings and specifications for the PDR design submittal and understand the overall project
constraints and goals.
1.2 Milestone Design Workshops– Wharton-Smith staff will attend (3) milestone design review
workshops. The purpose of these workshops are to review constructability, design comments,
potential MOPO, value engineering, and other design related items.
1.3 Monthly Progress Meetings– Wharton-Smith staff will attend (15) progress meetings with City of
Winter Springs and Carollo to review design progress, cost updates, action items, and other
outstanding items. These meetings will be combined with subject specific design discipline
meetings and may be held in-person or remotely (via Teams, Zoom, Webex, etc.). It is anticipated
that there will be 4 months with 2 meetings for a total of 15 meetings. Cost estimate deliverables &
Value Engineering meetings will be incorporated into these meetings.
1.4 Commission Meetings – Wharton-Smith staff will attend & prepare for (4) commission meetings to
support project update presentations from City of Winter Springs and Carollo.
1.5 Design Team Meetings – Wharton-Smith staff will attend (22) virtual bi-monthly meetings with
Carollo. These meetings are to review design progress, cost updates, action items, and any
outstanding items between Wharton-Smith and the design team to keep the project on-schedule.
These meetings will be held remotely as needed (via Teams, Zoom, Webex, etc.). These meetings
53
WHARTON-SMITH, INC.
are also intended to be used to prepare for meetings with the City to ensure that the Cities time is
used most effectively.
1.6 Site Specific Quality Plan –Wharton-Smith will develop a site-specific QA/QC plan for the
construction Work of the Project that meets the Agreement requirements and the Cities
expectations. Wharton-Smith policies for quality control as well as appropriate portions of the
Wharton-Smith quality manual will be incorporated into the QA/QC Plan. Manage quality assurance
and quality control on the Work to ensure that the design and construction complies with the
Construction Documents. CMAR shall work with Owner to develop this Plan and Owner shall have
right to review and comment on this Plan as it is being developed and finalized. Support the
activities of the Owner with regards to its construction materials engineering, testing and
inspection services.
1.7 Project Specific Site Utilization Plan - Wharton-Smith shall develop a Site Access and Logistics Plan
that the CMAR will implement to coordinate and manage the site constraints and challenges
including but not limited to traffic and pedestrian control, access to Site, material and supplies
delivery, laydown areas, safety and security considerations, protection of existing infrastructure,
etc. Wharton-Smith shall work with the City to develop this Plan and the City shall have right to
review and comment on this Plan as it is being developed and finalized.
1.8 Site Specific Health & Safety Plan –Wharton-Smith will develop a site-specific plan that covers all
policies related to safety including MSDS chemical sheets, trench safety, confined spaces, fall
protection, drug free policy, hurricane preparedness, emergency medical care plans, etc.
1.9 GMP Review Workshop – Wharton-Smith will provide the bid results and award recommendations
to City of Winter Springs and Carollo. Final vendor and subcontractor selection will be part of this
meeting.
1.10 Funding Coordination Workshops – Wharton-Smith staff will attend two (2) workshops with
City of Winter Springs and Carollo. These workshops will review all requirements set forth by the
funding agencies to ensure compliance during the construction and billing process.
1.11 Project Management, Scheduling, & Administration– This includes all work associated with
the project not specifically tied to a project deliverable. Including monthly preconstruction schedule
updates, preconstruction progress reports, billing, contracts, miscellaneous correspondence and
meetings.
1.12 Site Visits – Wharton-Smith will perform (4) site visits to investigate existing conditions,
review spatial constraints, evaluate structure placement, develop site utilization plans for
construction, develop MOPO’s and analyze site conditions for development of site-specific safety
and quality plans.
54
WHARTON-SMITH, INC.
1.13 Community Outreach Assistance – Wharton-Smith will provide assistance to the City’s
public outreach coordinator including schedule updates, photos, quotes, etc. for the City to utilize
to communicate with the community. Website, social media, email, or phone setup, maintenance,
or monitoring is not included as a part of this task, these are assumed to be handled by the city.
Task 2 Preliminary Cost Estimates
2.1 PDR Cost Estimate – Wharton-Smith preconstruction staff will perform takeoffs on all construction
trades such as site work, concrete, process equipment, utilities, mechanical, building, finishes, etc.
A full cost estimate book will be provided showing all material, labor, and equipment take-offs
along with subcontractor cost estimates. This estimate will be commensurate with the level of
detail in the PDR and will serve to provide the City with a general understanding of the cost to
facilitate necessary value engineering efforts.
2.2 SRF Cost Estimate – Wharton-Smith preconstruction staff will perform a detailed takeoff on the
updated SRF submittal drawings. The takeoffs will be on all construction trades. A full cost estimate
book will be provided showing all material, labor, and equipment take-offs along with
subcontractor cost estimates.
2.3 Preliminary GMP Cost Estimate – Wharton-Smith preconstruction staff will perform a detailed
takeoff of the post SRF deliverable design. This estimate is intended as an update to the overall
project cost, ahead of the full GMP, based on all final design VE decisions. This estimate is expected
to coincide with the early GMP tasks so that the City has a high confidence in the overall project
cost when approving the early GMP.
Task 3 Design and Constructability Reviews
3.1 PDR Submittal Constructability Review & Value Engineering (VE) – Wharton-Smith will perform
detailed design and constructability review to identify changes, conflicts, constructability concerns,
spatial concerns, general questions, and overall consistency of the design disciplines (structural,
civil, process, etc.). Value engineering options are also provided during this phase and throughout
the life cycle of the project. For each constructability review a detailed log of all comments is
provided to the City and Carollo who then have the opportunity to respond and agree upon a final
resolution to each.
3.2 Drone Deploys Flights & Processing – Perform drone flights over the site to capture site profiles.
Utilize this information to support estimating and bid quantities and to support value engineering
design reviews. Point clouds and CAD deliverables will be provided to the City and Carollo.
3.3 Initial Risk Register Development – Wharton-Smith will create a Risk Register to identify design
phase risks so that the team can address allocate any allowances or contingencies needed in the
project for any risks associated with the project. The risk register will be updated with each design
deliverable.
55
WHARTON-SMITH, INC.
3.4 MOPO & Preliminary Commissioning Plan Development & Review – Wharton-Smith staff will work
with Carollo and the City to develop & review MOPO’s (Maintenance of Plant Operations). Plans
will be generated to assist Carollo with finalizing the design to account for temporary bypassing or
facilities, startup accommodations, plant MOT, or other operational concerns. These items will be
used to generate the GMP bid documents and the risk register.
3.5 SRF Submittal Constructability Review & Value Engineering (VE) – These costs are for the same
items outlined in Task 3.1.
3.6 GMP Submittal Constructability Review & Value Engineering (VE) – These costs are for the same
items outlined in Task 3.1 but include a review of all documents to ensure that they are ready for
bidding.
3.7 IFC Submittal Constructability Review – These costs are for the same items outlined in Task 3.1 but
include final review of all documents to ensure that they are conformed and ready for construction.
Generally, CMAR shall review in-progress design documents, including at a minimum the documents
generally described above in 3.1 through 3.6 and provide input and advice to the Owner on constructability,
materials and equipment selections, and availability. Provide timely suggestions for modifications to
improve:
· Constructability, including sequencing or coordination issues, to enable Work to be completed with
a minimum of RFI’s and change orders.
· Recommend potential vendors and manufacturers for incorporation into the design.
· Adequacy of details for construction.
· Potential conflicts during construction.
· Ability to coordinate among Subcontractors and Suppliers.
· Coordination between Contract Documents.
· Operability.
· Ability to minimize disruptions to existing operations.
· Ability to complete construction connections to existing facilities or utilities.
· Modifications to facilitative commissioning and start-up and/or performance testing.
· Ability of Owner to operate/maintain the Work in a safe, time and cost-efficient manner when
completed.
Task 4 CPM Master Schedule
4.1 Schedule Development and Phasing – At the SRF design phase, Wharton-Smith will develop a
baseline Critical Path Method (CPM) schedule using Primavera P6 software based on available
information (and providing reasonable allowances for Owner review time and time for permits and
approvals from governmental agencies). The schedule will be broken down by phase
(design/permitting, procurement, construction, and closeout) as by structure. A detailed schedule
sequence will be provided for each structure. All portions of the project will be interrelated by
56
WHARTON-SMITH, INC.
schedule logic so that a true “critical path” is easily identifiable. This schedule will be managed and
updated as the project progresses.
4.2 Schedule Update at Preliminary GMP Submittal – The schedule developed in Task 4.1 will be
updated prior to GMP procurement. This schedule will have up to date information and lead times
based on the information received by the preconstruction team during the estimate phase.
4.3 Final GMP Schedule – The schedule developed in Task 4.1 is modified based on the GMP design
documents and final construction sequencing is determined. This schedule shall serve as the basis
for General Condition’s costs in the GMP as well as the contract time required for the duration of
construction.
Task 5 Bidding, Procurement, and GMP
5.1 Owner Direct Purchase Plan – In conjunction with the Owner, Wharton-Smith staff will identify and
assist the City in direct purchase of major equipment and materials for savings on sales tax.
5.2 Develop Procurement Plan– Wharton-Smith staff will generate an anticipated bid package
breakdown, starting at the PDR design milestone estimate. This will allow comparison of budget
changes from the PDR to SRF to Preliminary GMP estimates. This breakdown will be generated to
algin with supplier and subcontractor efficiencies to maximize bid participation and provide the
best value for City of Winter Springs. Wharton-Smith will present the City of Winter Springs with a
list of prequalified subcontractors and suppliers for review prior to GMP bidding. This will also be
used to identify the early GMP bid packages, we will use the schedule developed in task 4 along
with the vendor lead times collected in task 3. This plan will be reviewed during a monthly project
progress meeting.
5.3 Early GMP Procurement – Wharton-Smith will identify and break-out long lead equipment and early
work packages for these scopes to be procured and executed as early as practical so that the
overall construction schedule is minimized. Requirements for short-term and long-term storage will
be evaluated and implemented as necessary. Wharton-Smith preconstruction staff will also review
proposals from the membrane system suppliers along with proposals received from other selected
major equipment suppliers for incorporation into final design.
5.4 GMP Development – Wharton-Smith will identify and assemble appropriate work packages from
GMP design documents to solicit prospective subcontractor and supplier proposals for providing all
elements of Work not included in the General Conditions. Work packages will be assembled with
appropriate detailed scopes of work. Should the City Owner have any goals for involvement of the
local and/or small contracting community, those will be incorporated. A selected bidders list will be
developed and evaluated with City of Winter Springs prior to the bidding phase.
5.5 Pre-Bid Site Visits – Wharton-Smith will host, coordinate, and manage a pre-bid site visit for all
potential bidders for the subcontract and purchase order work packages. Wharton-Smith will take
notes and answer questions. Bid questions are required to be formally submitted to Wharton-Smith
in writing for coordination with City of Winter Springs and Engineer to provide responses.
57
WHARTON-SMITH, INC.
Clarifications/addenda will be issued to bidding parties as needed based on the formal bid
questions that are received.
5.6 Receive Bids – Wharton-Smith staff will receive bids throughout the course of an entire day. The bid
times may be staggered to ensure our ability to answer questions or provide directions up to the
last minute.
5.7 Review Bids and Recommend Award – All of the subcontractor and purchase order work package
bids are reviewed for completeness, responsiveness, exceptions, clarifications, and deviations from
the contract documents. Value engineering ideas and schedule commitments will also be
evaluated. Any bid exceptions, exclusions, or clarifications will be reviewed with the Engineer ahead
of recommendation of award. Wharton-Smith will provide a bid tabulation worksheet and make a
recommendation for package award based on the best interest of City of Winter Springs. Final
decision is made by Owner.
5.8 GMP Risk Register – The Risk Register developed on Task 3.3 will be updated to ensure all potential
risk is captured and all the allowances/contingencies assigned are correct. The GMP risk register
will have allocations that are agreed upon by all parties. All disbursements are reviewed and
approved by the City.
5.9 Final GMP Assembly – All documents that comprise the GMP are assembled into a single tabbed
and searchable binder/pdf document. This includes all schedules, bid documents, subcontractor
and supplier bids, Wharton-Smith self-perform cost estimates, other backup quotes, general
conditions breakdowns, value engineering logs, risk register, contingencies and allowances, and
other GMP relevant documents that were considered in creation of the GMP.
Task 6 Allowances
All allowances included are funds to be used at the discretion of the City. Wharton-Smtih will present any
costs to be billed against these allowances to the City for approval prior to usage. Unspent funds will be
returned to the City at the end of the preconstruction phase. There is no contingency for overage of these
allowances and thus any overage would need to be amended via change order.
6.1 Electrical Estimates and Power Co Assistance—An electrical subcontractor will be brought to the
team at an early design stage to provide constructability feedback to help the Engineer finalize the
electrical design of the plant and to provide detailed cost estimating.
6.2 Early Duke Energy Design – This task includes time for Wharton-Smith to coordinate with Duke
energy and to solicit early design costs so that the preliminary design work for Duke energy can
occur before construction start. A $10,000 allowance for the Duke engineering fees has been
included, however, the cost will not be known until we receive a quote from Duke so this amount
may go up or down.
6.3 Emergency Work – Any emergency work needed by City of Winter Springs when Wharton-Smith is
under contract.
58
WHARTON-SMITH, INC.
6.4 Lead and Asbestos Testing – Wharton-Smith will contract out this testing, ahead of the GMP, so
that bidders are aware of the requirements. This testing is a requirement for any demolition
activities.
6.5 Grant Funding – This allowance would allow the City to use the services of Hale Innovations to put
together an evaluation and sequencing plan to submit (1) AWT permit. Hale will put together the
grant submittal and follow the submission through to final grant allocation decisions. Grant
management during construction is not included in this scope and would be handled with the GMP
should the grant be awarded.
Fee Summary: Please reference the breakdown, on the next page, by task.
Fee, Bond and Insurance rates: The following applies to the construction phase of the project. Fee is
established at 8.5%, Bond will be at the actual bond cost which is estimated at approximately 0.7% of total
project cost. GL insurance will be 1.05% of total project cost, and builders risk insurance will be calculated
based on the current rates and the projected project schedule. The general conditions costs will be
presented to City of Winter Springs at the PDR design cost estimate and will be refined based on the GMP
schedule at the time the GMP is presented. General conditions costs will be presented in an open-book
manner for each item.
59
OWNER:CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
PROJECT:WASTEWATERTREATMENT FACILITIES - EAST PLANT
ENGINEER CAROLLO
CURRENT DESIGN STATUS:PDR
$181.00 $175.00 $162.00 $162.00 Rate $163.00 Rate $92.00 Rate $181.00 Rate $151.00 Rate $81.00 Rate $131.00 Rate $120.00 Rate $162.00 Rate $136.00
HR $ HR $ HR $ HR $ HR $ HR $ HR $ HR $ HR $ HR $ HR 0 HR $ HR $ SUB COST
TASK 1 PROJECT COORDINATION
1.1 PROJECT KICKOFF MEETING 1 EA 2 362 4 700 4 648 0 0 2 184 0 0 1 81 0 0 0 0 13 1,975 41 2,016 2,016
1.2 ATTEND DESIGN MILESTONE MEETINGS 3 EA 0 12 2100 12 1944 0 0 3 276 0 0 3 243 0 0 0 0 30 4,563 96 4,659 4,659
1.3 ATTEND MONTHLY PROGRESS MEETINGS - 4 Months with double meetings 15 EA 0 15 2625 45 7290 0 0 4 368 8 1448 0 2 162 0 0 0 0 74 11,893 236 12,129 12,129
1.4 ATTEND COMMISSION MEETINGS 4 EA 0 16 2800 8 1296 0 0 4 368 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 4,464 89 4,553 4,553
1.5 DESIGN TEAM MEETINGS (VIRTUAL BI-MONTHLY) 22 EA 0 11 1925 22 3564 0 0 0 11 1991 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 7,480 140 7,620 7,620
1.6 PROJECT QA/QC MANAUAL 1 LS 0 1 175 2 324 4 648 2 326 2 184 0 0 1 81 2 262 0 16 2592 0 30 4,592 96 4,688 4,688
1.7 SITE UTILIZATION PLAN 1 EA 0 1 175 8 1296 8 1296 8 1304 2 184 0 0 1 81 2 262 0 0 0 30 4,598 96 4,694 4,694
1.8 PROJECT SPECIFIC HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN 1 EA 0 1 175 2 324 2 324 4 652 2 184 0 0 1 81 2 262 0 0 16 2176 30 4,178 96 4,274 4,274
1.90 GMP REVIEW WORKSHOP 1 EA 0 8 1400 4 648 2 324 0 1 92 2 362 0 1 81 0 0 0 0 18 2,907 57 2,964 2,964
1.10 FUNDING COORDINATION WORKSHOPS 2 EA 0 4 700 6 972 0 0 2 184 2 362 0 2 162 0 0 0 0 16 2,380 51 2,431 2,431
1.11 PROJECT MANAGEMENT, SCHEDULING, & ADMINISTRATION 1 LS 12 2172 46 8050 120 19440 12 1944 0 40 3680 0 0 40 3240 24 3144 40 4800 0 8 1088 390 47,558 1,244 48,802 48,802
1.12 SITE VISITS 4 EA 0 16 2800 16 2592 8 1296 24 3912 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 544 68 11,144 217 11,361 11,361
1.13 COMMUNITY OUTREACH ASSISTANCE 1 LS 0 8 1400 24 3888 0 0 24 2208 0 0 8 648 0 0 0 0 64 8,144 204 8,348 8,348
SUBTOTALS 14 2534 143 25025 273 44226 36 5832 38 6194 86 7912 23 4163 0 0 60 4860 30 3930 40 4800 16 2592 28 3808 835 115,876 2,664 118,540 - 118,540
TASK 2 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES
2.1 PDR COST ESTIMATE 1 EA 2 362 8 1296 24 3888 8 1296 0 8 736 40 7240 100 15100 4 324 1 131 0 0 0 195 30,373 622 30,995 - 30,995
2.2 SRF COST ESTIMATE 1 EA 4 724 16 2592 32 5184 16 2592 0 8 736 60 10860 180 27180 6 486 1 131 0 0 0 323 50,485 1,030 51,515 - 51,515
2.3 PRELIMINARY GMP COST ESTIMATE 1 EA 1 181 4 648 16 2592 4 648 0 6 552 24 4344 48 7248 2 162 0 0 0 0 105 16,375 335 16,710 - 16,710
SUBTOTALS 7 1267 28 4536 72 11664 28 4536 0 0 22 2024 124 22444 328 49528 12 972 2 262 0 0 0 0 0 0 623 97,233 1,987 99,220 - 99,220
TASK 3 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTABILITY REVIEWS
3.1 PDR SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTABILITY REVIEW & VE 1 EA 0 6 1050 24 3888 8 1296 4 652 1 92 0 0 2 162 0 0 1 162 1 136 47 7,438 150 7,588 - 7,588
3.2 DRONE DEPLOYS FLIGHTS & PROCESSING 1 LS 0 2 350 4 648 2 324 4 652 1 92 0 0 1 81 0 0 1 162 1 136 16 2,445 51 2,496 VDC 7,000.00 9,496
3.3 INITIAL RISK REGISTER DEVELOPMENT 1 LS 1 181 2 350 12 1944 6 972 2 326 1 92 4 724 0 1 81 1 131 0 0 0 30 4,801 96 4,897 - 4,897
3.4 MOPO & PRELIMINARY COMMISSIONING PLANS DEVELOPMENT & REVIEW 1 LS 0 8 1400 16 2592 16 2592 8 1304 2 184 4 724 0 1 81 2 262 0 1 162 2 272 60 9,573 191 9,764 - 9,764
3.5 SRF SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTABILITY REVIEW & VE 1 EA 0 12 2100 40 6480 12 1944 8 1304 1 92 6 1086 16 2416 2 162 0 0 2 324 2 272 101 16,180 322 16,502 - 16,502
3.6 GMP SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTABILITY REVIEW & VE 1 EA 0 8 1400 24 3888 12 1944 6 978 1 92 6 1086 16 2416 2 162 0 0 2 324 2 272 79 12,562 252 12,814 - 12,814
3.7 IFC SUBMITTAL / CONFORMED DOCUMENTS REVIEW 1 EA 0 2 350 16 2592 2 324 4 652 1 92 2 362 0 2 162 0 0 1 162 1 136 31 4,832 99 4,931 - 4,931
SUBTOTALS 1 181 40 7000 136 22032 58 9396 36 5868 8 736 22 3982 32 4832 11 891 3 393 0 0 8 1296 9 1224 364 57,831 1161 58992 7,000.00 65,992
TASK 4 CPM MASTER SCHEDULE
4.1 SCHEDULE DEVELOPMENT AND PHASING (@ SRF DELIVERABLE) 1 EA 1 181 2 324 8 1296 4 648 2 326 0 0 0 1 81 0 0 0 0 18 2,856 57 2,913 - 2,913
4.2 SCHEDULE UPDATE AT PRELIMINARY GMP SUBMITTAL 1 EA 1 181 2 324 16 2592 16 2592 4 652 0 0 0 1 81 0 0 0 0 40 6,422 128 6,550 - 6,550
4.3 FINAL SCHEDULE UPDATE AT GMP (DETERMINES GC'S) 1 EA 1 181 2 350 6 972 2 324 2 326 0 0 0 1 81 0 0 0 0 14 2,234 45 2,279 - 2,279
SUBTOTALS 3 543 6 998 30 4860 22 3564 8 1304 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 243 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 11,512 230 11,742 - 11,742
TASK 5 BIDDING, PROCUREMENT, AND GMP
5.1 OWNER DIRECT PURCHASE PLAN 1 LS 1 181 2 350 6 972 1 162 0 1 92 0 0 1 81 1 131 1 120 0 0 14 2,089 45 2,134 - 2,134
5.2 DEVELOP PROCUREMENT PLAN 1 LS 2 362 16 2800 16 2592 8 1296 0 8 736 0 0 2 162 4 524 4 480 0 0 60 8,952 191 9,143 - 9,143
5.3 EARLY GMP PROCUREMENT 1 LS 1 181 8 1400 40 6480 16 2592 0 24 2208 4 724 4 604 4 324 2 262 0 2 324 2 272 107 15,371 341 15,712 - 15,712
5.4 GMP DEVELOPMENT 1 LS 1 181 12 2100 60 9720 60 9720 0 16 1472 8 1448 16 2416 12 972 4 524 0 8 1296 8 1088 205 30,937 654 31,591 - 31,591
5.5 PRE-BID SITE VISITS 1 EA 0 2 350 8 1296 8 1296 2 326 2 184 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 3,452 70 3,522 - 3,522
5.6 RECEIVE BIDS (SINGLE BID DAY) 1 LS 0 2 350 8 1296 2 324 0 8 736 0 0 4 324 0 0 0 0 24 3,030 77 3,107 - 3,107
5.7 REVIEW BIDS AND RECOMMEND AWARD 1 LS 0 2 350 16 2592 4 648 2 326 8 736 8 1448 0 4 324 2 262 0 0 0 46 6,686 147 6,833 - 6,833
5.8 GMP RISK REGISTER 1 LS 1 181 2 350 12 1944 6 972 2 326 1 92 4 724 0 1 81 1 131 0 0 0 30 4,801 96 4,897 - 4,897
5.9 FINAL GMP ASSEMBLY 1 LS 1 181 4 700 10 1620 6 972 0 4 368 0 0 4 324 4 524 0 0 0 33 4,689 105 4,794 - 4,794
SUBTOTALS 7 1267 50 8750 176 28512 111 17982 6 978 72 6624 24 4344 20 3020 32 2592 18 2358 5 600 10 1620 10 1360 541 80,007 1,726 81,733 - 81,733
LUMP SUM SUBTOTAL 377,227
LUMP SUM TASKS FEE (8.5%)32,064
LUMP SUM TASKS INSURANCE (1.05%)3,961
-
LUMP SUM TASKS GRAND TOTAL 413,252
- -
TASK 6 ALLOWANCES
6.1 ALLOWANCE - ELECTRICAL ESTIMATES AND POWER CO ASSISTANCE 1 LS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - Sinns & Thomas 10,000.00 10,000
6.2 ALLOWANCE - EARLY DUKE ENERGY DESIGN 1 LS 0 8 1296 32 5184 2 324 2 326 4 368 4 724 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 6,926 166 7,092 Duke Energy 10,000.00 17,092
6.3 ALLOWANCE - EMERGENCY WORK 1 LS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - TBD 100,000.00 100,000
6.4 ALLOWANCE - LEAD AND ASBESTOS TESTING 1 EA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - TBD 10,000.00 10,000
6.5 ALLOWANCE - AWT GRANT FUNDING 1 EA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - Hale Innovations 20,000.00 20,000
SUBTOTALS - - 8 1,296 32 5,184 2 324 2 326 4 368 4 724 - - - - - - - - - - - - 52 6,926 166 7,092 150,000.00 157,092
OPTIONAL/ALLOWANCE TASKS FEE (8.5%)13,353
OPTIONAL/ALLOWANCE TASKS INSURANCE (1.05%)1,649
-
OPTIONAL/ALLOWANCE TASKS GRAND TOTAL 172,094
-
32 275 719 257 90 192 197 380 118 53 45 34 47 2487 369,385 7,934 377,319 GRAND TOTAL 585,346
HR's $ TOTALS
WHARTON-SMITH PERSONNEL SUBCONTRACTOR
LABOR COSTS
MISC. COSTS
(PRO-RATED) SUBTOTAL
Qu
a
l
i
t
y
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
Sa
f
e
t
y
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
ITEM TASK QTY UNIT
TOTAL PRECONSTRUCTION SERVICES
OFFICE & FIELD MANAGEMENT STAFF ESTIMATING & SUPPORT STAFF
Pr
i
n
c
i
p
a
l
I
n
Ch
a
r
g
e
Se
n
i
o
r
Pr
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
Se
n
i
o
r
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
Se
n
i
o
r
Su
p
e
r
i
n
t
e
n
d
e
n
t
Ad
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
v
e
As
s
i
s
t
a
n
t
Di
r
e
c
t
o
r
o
f
Es
t
i
m
a
t
i
n
g
Pr
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Di
r
e
c
t
o
r
Ri
s
k
C
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
o
r
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
i
t
y
Es
t
i
m
a
t
o
r
s
Do
c
u
m
e
n
t
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
i
s
t
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Ac
c
o
u
n
t
a
n
t
60