HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022 05 23 Regular 500 - Discussion regarding the 2021 SCPS Interlocal Agreement (ILA) for Public School Facility Planning & School ConcurrencyREGULAR AGENDA ITEM 500
CITY COMMISSION AGENDA | MAY 23, 2022 REGULAR MEETING
TITLE
Discussion regarding the 2021 SCPS Interlocal Agreement (ILA) for Public
School Facility Planning and School Concurrency
SUMMARY
In 2007, as amended in 2008, an Interlocal Agreement (ILA) for Public Facility
Planning and School Concurrency, pursuant to Florida Statue, was adopted by
the Seminole County School Board, Seminole County Board of County
Commissioners, and all of the City Commissions within Seminole County. The
2007/2008 Amended ILA is the version that the County, Cities, and School
District currently operate under.
In 2019, the Seminole County School Board requested that the ILA be
amended in order to align it with the School Board policy. The 2021 SCPS ILA
version was approved (3-2) by the Seminole County Board of County
Commissioners.
On November 8, 2021, Seminole County School Representatives presented
the proposed 2021 SCPS ILA. The City Commission took no action, however
Commissioners agreed they would like to further review with the City
Attorney and propose language.
The City Attorney has prepared an updated Winter Springs proposal, 2022
Winter Springs ILA Proposal 5.11.22, for the City Commission to review.
RECOMMENDATION
City Staff is requesting discussion on the proposed 2021 SCPS Interlocal
Agreement (ILA) for Public School Facility Planning and School Concurrency
and direction if the City Commission wishes to move forward with changes to
the proposed 2021 ILA.
1772
Winter Springs Proposed Draft 5.11.2022
Page 1 of 39
20212 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL
FACILITY PLANNING AND SCHOOL CONCURRENCY
Seminole County, Florida
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into with the Seminole County Board of County
Commissioners (hereinafter referred to as the "County"), the Commission or Council of
the CitiesCity of Longwood, Altamonte Springs, Oviedo, Winter Springs, Lake Mary,
Sanford, Casselberry (hereinafter referred to as the “City” "Cities"), and the School Board
of Seminole County (hereinafter referred to as the "School Board"), collectively referred to
as the “Parties”.
WHEREAS, the County, Cities City and the School Board recognize their mutual
obligation and responsibility for the education, nurturing and general well-being of the
children within their community; and
WHEREAS, the County, Cities City and the School Board are authorized to enter
into this Agreement pursuant to Section 163.01, Section 163.3177(6)(h)2 and Section
1013.33, Florida Statutes (F.S.); and
WHEREAS, the County, Cities, City and School Board recognize the following
benefits to the citizens and students of their communities by more closely coordinating
their comprehensive land use and school facilities planning programs: (1) better
coordination of the timing and location of new schools with land development, (2) greater
efficiency for the school board and local governments by siting schools to take advantage
of existing and planned roads, water, sewer, and parks, (3) improved student access and
safety by coordinating the construction of new and expanded schools with the road and
sidewalk construction programs of the local governments, (4) better designed urban form
by locating and designing schools to serve as community focal points, (5) greater
efficiency and convenience by co-locating schools with parks, ball fields, libraries, and
other community facilities to take advantage of joint use opportunities, and (6) reduction
of the factors that contribute to urban sprawl and support of existing neighborhoods by
appropriately locating new schools and expanding and renovating existing schools; and
WHEREAS, the County, Cities City and School Board have determined that it is
necessary and appropriate for the entities to cooperate with each other to provide
adequate public school facilities in a timely manner and at appropriate locations, to
eliminate any deficit of permanent student stations, and to provide capacity for projected
new growth; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to structure Concurrency Service Areas so
as to reduce student transportation costs, minimize student transportation times, and
maximize current and future student capacity at schools in close proximity to actual and
projected population of school age children, while still respecting opportunities for land
development in Seminole County; and
WHEREAS, Section 1013.33(4), F.S., requires that the location of public
educational facilities must be consistent with the comprehensive plan and implementing
land development regulations of the appropriate local governing body; and
WHEREAS, Sections 163.3177(6)(h)1 and 2, F.S., require each local government
to adopt an intergovernmental coordination element as part of their comprehensive plan
1773
Winter Springs Proposed Draft 5.11.2022
Page 2 of 39
that states principles and guidelines to be used in the accomplishment of coordination of
the adopted comprehensive plan with the plans of the school boards, and describes the
processes for collaborative planning and decision making on population projections and
public school siting; and
WHEREAS, Sections 163.31777 and 1013.33, F.S., require the County, Cities City
and School Board to establish jointly the specific ways in which the plans and processes
of the School Board and the local governments are to be coordinated; and
WHEREAS, Section 163.3180(6)(a) F.S. requires local governments that choose
to apply concurrency to public education facilities to include principles, guidelines,
standards, and strategies, including adopted levels of service, in their comprehensive
plans and interlocal agreements; and
WHEREAS the local government signatories to this Agreement School Board and
City have chosen to apply concurrency, as applied to an application for a development permit
with the jurisdictional limits of the City of Winter Springs, to public education facilities using
Concurrency Service Areas as described in Appendix “A”; and
WHEREAS, the County and Cities are City is entering into this Agreement in
reliance on the School Board’s obligation to prepare, adopt and implement a financially
feasible capital facilities program to achieve public schools operating at the adopted level
of service consistent with the timing specified in the School Board’s Capital Facilities Plan,
and the School Board’s further commitment to update the plan annually to address
projected growth in order to maintain the adopted level of service and to demonstrate that
the utilization of school capacity is maximized to the greatest extent possible pursuant to
Section 163.3180(6)(f)2, F.S.; and
WHEREAS, the School Board, is entering into this Agreement in reliance on the
County and Cities’ City’s obligation to adopt amendments to their local comprehensive
plans to impose optional School Concurrency as provided in Sections 163.3180(1)(a) and
163.3180(6)(a), F.S.; and
NOW THEREFORE, be it mutually agreed among the School Board, the County
and the Citiesand the City (hereinafter referred to collectively as the “Parties”) that the
following definitions and procedures will be followed in coordinating land use, public school
facilities planning, and school concurrency.
1774
Winter Springs Proposed Draft 5.11.2022
Page 3 of 39
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL
FACILITY PLANNING AND SCHOOL CONCURRENCY
TBD Seminole County, Florida
Table of Contents
SECTION 1 DEFINITIONS .......................................................................................... 5
SECTION 2 COMMITTEES AND DUTIES ................................................................... 8
2.1 Planning Technical Advisory Committee (PTAC) ................................................. 8
2.2 Public Schools Facilities Planning Committee (PSFPC) ...................................... 8
SECTION 3 STUDENT ENROLLMENT AND POPULATION PROJECTIONS............ 9
3.1 Population and Student Enrollment Projections Distributed Annually ................... 9
3.2 Student Projections .............................................................................................. 9
SECTION 4 COORDINATING AND SHARING OF INFORMATION ........................... 9
4.1 School Board Educational Facilities Work Plan .................................................... 9
4.2 Educational Plant Survey ..................................................................................... 9
SECTION 5 SCHOOL SITE SELECTION, REMODELING, AND SCHOOL CLOSURES ......... 10
5.1 New School Sites............................................................................................... 10
5.2 School site Plan Review .................................................................................... 10
5.3 Remodeling and Closures .................................................................................. 10
5.4 Joint Consideration of On-Site and Off-Site Improvements ................................ 11
5.5 Expansion, Renovation, or Construction ............................................................ 11
SECTION 6 LOCAL PLANNING AGENCIES (LPA), COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS,
REZONINGS, AND DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS ......................................... 11
6.1 Appointed LPA Members ................................................................................... 11
6.2 County and City Development Applications Shared with the School Board ........ 11
6.3 Criteria for Evaluating Residential Development Applications ............................ 11
6.4 Formulating City and County Plans and Programs ............................................. 12
SECTION 7 CO-LOCATION AND SHARED USE ..................................................... 12
7.1 Co-Location and Shared Use ............................................................................. 12
7.2 Mutual Use Agreement ...................................................................................... 12
SECTION 8 SPECIFIC RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARTIES .............................. 13
8.1 Specific Responsibilities of the County and Cities City ...................................... 13
8.2 Specific Responsibilities of the School Board .................................................... 13
SECTION 9 SCHOOL BOARD CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ............................ 14
9.1 School Board’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan ......................................... 14
9.2 Educational Facilities Work Plan ........................................................................ 15
9.3 Transmittal ......................................................................................................... 15
9.4 Adoption ............................................................................................................ 15
1775
Winter Springs Proposed Draft 5.11.2022
Page 4 of 39
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL
FACILITY PLANNING AND SCHOOL CONCURRENCY
TBD
Seminole County, Florida
Table of Contents continued
SECTION 10 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ELEMENTS ................................................. 15
10.1 Required Comprehensive Plan Amendments .................................................... 15
10.2 Development, Adoption, and Amendment of the Capital Improvements
Element (CIE) .................................................................................................... 15
SECTION 11 SCHOOL CONCURRENCY PROGRAM ............................................... 16
11.1 Commencement of School Concurrency ............................................................ 16
11.2 Concurrency Service Areas (CSA) ..................................................................... 16
11.3 Level of Service (LOS) ....................................................................................... 17
11.4 School Concurrency Regulations ....................................................................... 17
SECTION 12 UNIFORM SCHOOL CONCURRENCY PROCESS ............................... 18
12.1 General Provisions ............................................................................................ 18
12.2 School Concurrency Application Review ............................................................ 19
12.3 Methodology ...................................................................................................... 20
12.4 Development Review Table ............................................................................... 21
12.5 Development Agreement for Mitigation .............................................................. 22
12.6 School Concurrency Approval ........................................................................... 24
12.7 Reserved Capacity ............................................................................................ 24
12.8 Appeal Process …………………………………………..……………………………25
SECTION 13 OVERSIGHT .......................................................................................... 25
13.1 Oversight ........................................................................................................... 25
SECTION 14 SPECIAL PROVISION ........................................................................... 26
14.1 School Board Requirements .............................................................................. 26
14.2 Land Use Authority ............................................................................................ 26
SECTION 15 AMENDMENT PROCESS, NOTICE, AND TERM OF AGREEMENT .... 26
15.1 Amendment of the Agreement ........................................................................... 26
15.2 Notice Requirements ......................................................................................... 26
15.3 Repeal of the Agreement ................................................................................... 27
15.4 Termination of the Agreement ........................................................................... 27
15.5 Withdrawal ......................................................................................................... 27
SECTION 16 RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES ............................................................... 27
16.1 Dispute Resolution ............................................................................................. 27
SECTION 17 EXECUTION IN COUNTERPARTS ....................................................... 27
17.1 Agreement Execution ........................................................................................ 27
SECTION 18 SUCCESSION OF AGREEMENT .......................................................... 27
18.1 Succession of Agreement .................................................................................. 27
SECTION 19 EFFECTIVE DATE ................................................................................. 27
19.1 Effective Date ………………………………………………………………………….27
APPENDIX “A” Concurrency Service Areas (CSA)………………………………37
1776
Winter Springs Proposed Draft 5.11.2022
Page 5 of 39
SECTION 1 DEFINITIONS
Adjacent Concurrency Service Area: A concurrency service area which is contiguous
and touches the boundary of another concurrency service area along one side.
Attendance Zone: The geographic area in which all resident students are assigned to a
specific school or region school.
Building Permit: An approval by a local government authorizing residential construction
on a specific property.
Capital Outlay, Full Time Equivalent (COFTE) Projections: Florida Department
of Education (FDOE) COHORT student enrollment projections for Florida public
school districts, issued annually and based on information produced by the demographic,
revenue, and education estimating conferences pursuant to s. 216.136 and s. 1013.64(3)
F.S, as adjusted by the FDOE Office of Educational Facilities.
Charter School: Public schools of choice which operate under a performance contract,
or a “charter,” in accordance with Section 1002.33, F.S. Charter schools in the Seminole
County Public School District are Countywide schools of choice and do not have a
specified capacity as defined in Rule 6A-2.0010 F.A.C., State Requirements for
Educational Facilities 2014 (“SREF”) and FISH. Charter schools are not included in
concurrency or enrollment calculations.
CitiesCity: City of Winter SpringsAll municipalities in Seminole County
Comprehensive Plan: A plan that meets the requirements of Sections 163.3177 F.S.
Concurrency Service Area (CSA): A geographic unit promulgated by the School Board
and adopted by local governments the City within which the level of service is measured
when an application for residential development within the jurisdictional limits of the City
of Winter Springs is reviewed for school concurrency purposes under this Agreement. The
CSA’s which are applicable to this Agreement are specifically and exclusively identified as
set forth in Appendix “A.”
Consistency: Compatible with and furthering the goals, objectives and policies of the
County and CitiesCity’s Comprehensive Plan Elements and this Agreement.
Core Facilities: The media center kitchen/cafeteria, multi-purpose, toilet facilities,
administration, gymnasiums, auditoriums, and circulation space of an educational facility.
Days: All references to “days” or “day” mean calendar days unless specifically noted
otherwise.
Developer: Any person, including a governmental agency, undertaking any residential
construction.
Development Agreement for Mitigation: A developer improvement or contribution
identified in a binding and enforceable agreement between the Developer, the School
Board and the local government with jurisdiction over the approval of the development
approval to provide mitigation proportionate to the demand for public school facilities to be
created by actual development of the property, as set forth in Section 163.3180(6)(h)2 F.S
Development Approval: Site plan, final subdivision or functional equivalent, issued by a
local government the City granting, or granting with conditions, a Development
Application.
1777
Winter Springs Proposed Draft 5.11.2022
Page 6 of 39
Educational Facilities Impact Fee: A fee designated to assist in the funding for
acquisition and development of school facilities, owned and operated by the School Board,
needed to serve new growth and development.
Educational Facilities Work Plan: The School Board’s annual capital planning document
that includes long-range planning for facilities needs over 5-year and 10-year periods.
Educational Facility: The buildings, equipment, structures, ancillary, site improvements,
and special educational use areas that are built, installed or established to serve public
educational purposes.
Educational Plant Survey: A systematic study approved by the Florida Department of
Education (FDOE) of present educational and ancillary plants and the determination of
future needs to provide an appropriate educational program and services for each student
based on projected capital outlay FTE (COFTE) counts prepared and issued by the FDOE.
Fall Semester Student Count: The fall semester student count (Second Survey) of all
“full-time equivalent” students, pursuant to Chapter 1011.62, F.S.
Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan: The School Board’s annually adopted financially
feasible, five-year list of capital improvements which address student capacity to achieve
and maintain the adopted level of service.
Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH): Data, inventory and numbering system
used by the Florida Department of Education, Office of Educational Facilities for parcels
of land, buildings and rooms in public educational facilities to include permanent and
portable student stations (hereinafter referred to as "FISH).
Level of Service Standard (LOS): ): A standard or condition established by the School
District to measure utilization within a concurrency service area. Current Level of Service
is determined by the sum of the Fall Semester Student Count at the same type of schools
within a concurrency service area, divided by the sum of the Program School Capacity of
the same type of schools within a concurrency service area
Local Governments: the City of Winter Springs or as applicable Seminole County and
other Seminole County its Cities.
Modular Classroom: A room designated in FISH within an educational facility which
contains student stations and where students receive instruction and which, the life
expectancy of the structure, also as designated in FISH is 35 - 49 years. Modular
classrooms generally consist of pre-manufactured concrete and/or steel type structures
owned by the School Board.
Permanent Classroom: A room designated in FISH within an educational facility which
contains student stations and where students receive instruction and which, the life
expectancy of the structure, also as designated in FISH, is 50 years or more.
Permanent Student Station: A designated space contained within a permanent building
or structure that can accommodate a student for an instructional program and is
designated satisfactory in FISH data. The total number of permanent student stations at
an educational facility is determined by the sum of individual permanent student stations
at the facility. Permanent buildings or structure types are designated by the School Board
and include permanently constructed buildings having a life expectancy of 50 years or
more and modular buildings as identified in FISH, having a life expectancy exceeding 35
– 49 years
1778
Winter Springs Proposed Draft 5.11.2022
Page 7 of 39
Planning Technical Advisory Committee (PTAC): This committee is comprised of
planning staff representatives from Seminole County, each of the seven municipal
corporations within the County, and the City and the Seminole County School
Board. PTAC serves as an advisory committee and working group to enhance
intergovernmental coordination of comprehensive plan programs and assists in ensuring
consistency between these programs and issues of multi-jurisdictional concern.
Program School Capacity: The optimal number of students that can be housed for
instruction at an educational facility as prescribed in School Board Policy po5120 – School
Attendance Zones and Interzone Transfers in permanent, modular, and temporary type
classroom spaces designated in FISH.
A. Program School Capacity of an elementary school is 95% of the sum of student
stations assigned to permanent, modular, and temporary classrooms at the
school.
B. Program School Capacity of a middle school is 90% of the sum of student stations
assigned to permanent, modular, and temporary classrooms at the school.
C. Program School Capacity of high schools is less than the sum of student stations
assigned to permanent and modular classrooms at the school. The amount less is
prescribed in School Board Policy po5120 – School Attendance Zones and
Interzone Transfers and Rule 6A-2.0010 F.A.C., State Requirements for
Educational Facilities.
increase in the total number of housing units.
Public School Concurrency Program: A program established by Seminole County,
each of the seven municipal corporations within the County, and the Seminole County
School Board to meet the requirements of Sections 163.31777, 163.3180, and 1013.33
F.S.
Public Schools Facilities Planning Committee (PSFPC): The PSFPC is created and
established by this agreement. This committee is comprised of one elected official, or
their designee, from Seminole County, each of the seven municipal corporations within
the County, the City and the Seminole County School Board. The PSFPC is responsible
for the oversight of the school concurrency program established in this agreement and
hears recommendations from PTAC on school planning issues and may make
recommendations to the School Board.
Reserved Capacity: School capacity that is assigned to a proposed project once it has
received a SCALD approval for the project’s SCALD Application.
Residential Development: Any development that is comprised of dwelling units, in whole
or in part, for permanent human habitation.
School Board: The governing body established under Article IX, Section 4, of the Florida
Constitution.
School Capacity Availability Letter of Determination (SCALD): A letter prepared by
the School Board of Seminole County, identifying if school capacity is available to serve a
residential project., and if capacity exists, advising that capacity has been reserved.
School Capacity: See Program School Capacity
1779
Winter Springs Proposed Draft 5.11.2022
Page 8 of 39
School District: The School District of Seminole County is created pursuant to Article IX,
Section 4, of the Florida Constitution.
School Impact Analysis (SCALD Application): A formal description of a residential
project subject to school concurrency review provided by the developer for School Board
review in accordance with Section 12 of this Agreement.
School Year: Means the period from July 1 to June 30.
Student Station: A satisfactory space contained within a building or structure as
designated in FISH that can accommodate a student for an instructional program.
Temporary Classroom: Also referred to as a relocatable or portable classroom. A room
designated in FISH within an educational facility which contains student stations and
where students receive instruction and which, the life expectancy of the structure, also as
designated in FISH, is less than 35 years. Temporary classrooms generally consist of
mobile trailer structures or transportable wood frame type structures. Student stations in
temporary classrooms shall not be considered for the purposes of determining
concurrency or included in any capacity determination of any CSA.
Type of School: An educational facility providing the same grade level of education,
i.e.: elementary (grades PK-5), middle (grades 6-8), or high school (grades 9-12) or
special purpose school such as magnet school.
Utilization: The comparison of the total number of students enrolled to the total number
of Program School Capacity as determined by School Board Policy po5120 – School
Attendance Zones and Interzone Transfers.
SECTION 2 COMMITTEES AND DUTIES
2.1 Planning Technical Advisory Committee (PTAC). PTAC will meet, at a
minimum on a semi-annual basis, in the first and third quarter of the school year,
to discuss issues and formulate recommendations to the PSFPC regarding
coordination of land use and school facilities planning, including such issues as
population and student projections, development trends, school needs, co-location
and joint use opportunities, ancillary infrastructure improvements needed to
support the schools, School Board Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan and the
Public School Concurrency Program. A designee of the School Board shall be
responsible for coordinating and convening the semi-annual meeting.
2.2 Public Schools Facilities Planning Committee (PSFPC). The Parties hereby
establish a Public Schools Facilities Planning Committee for the purpose of
reviewing recommendations from PTAC on land use and school facilities planning,
including such issues as population and student projections, development trends,
school needs, co-location and joint use opportunities, ancillary infrastructure
improvements needed to support the school, potential sites for new schools, and
proposals for significant renovation and potential closure of existing schools.
Based on the review of PTAC’s recommendations, the PSFPC will submit
recommendations to the School Board. Additionally, the PSFPC will be a standing
committee to review the School Board Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan in
accordance with Sections 4.1 and 10 of this Agreement, and serve as the required
oversight committee for the Public School Concurrency Program as detailed in
Section 13 of this Agreement.
1780
Winter Springs Proposed Draft 5.11.2022
Page 9 of 39
The PSFPC will meet annually to hear reports, discuss policy, set direction, and
reach understandings concerning issues of mutual concern regarding coordination
of land use and school facilities planning, including population and student growth,
development trends, school needs, off-site improvements, joint use opportunities,
and school concurrency.
SECTION 3 STUDENT ENROLLMENT AND POPULATION PROJECTIONS
3.1 Population and Student Enrollment Projections Distributed Annually.
In fulfillment of their respective planning duties, the County, Cities, City and School
Board agree to coordinate and base their plans upon consistent projections of the
amount, type, and distribution of population growth and student enrollment. At the
annual first quarter PTAC meeting described at Subsection 2.1, the County and
Cities City shall provide updated five-year population projections and the School
Board will supply the annually updated student enrollment projections.
3.2 Student Projections. The Parties agree to use student population projections
based on Capital Outlay Full Time Equivalent (COFTE) cohort projections issued
by FDOE in first quarter of each school year.
SECTION 4 COORDINATING AND SHARING OF INFORMATION
4.1 School Board Educational Facilities Work Plan. During the first quarter of each
school year, the School Board shall submit to the County, each City and the Public
Schools Facilities Planning Committee (PSFPC) City the School Board
Educational Facilities Work Plan prior to adoption by the Board.
A. The Plan will be consistent with the requirements of Section 1013.35, F.S.,
and include projected student populations apportioned geographically, an
inventory of existing school facilities, projections of facility space needs,
information on relocatable or portable classrooms, general locations of new
schools for the 5- and 10-year time periods.
B. The Plan will also include the financially feasible School Board Capital
Improvement Plan for a 5-year period. The Cities and County City shall
review the plan and provide written comments to the School Board annually
-within twenty (20) days of receipt of the 5 Year Capital Improvement Plan
(CIP).
4.2 Educational Plant Survey. PTAC will assist the School Board in an advisory
capacity in the preparation and update of the Educational Plant Survey.
The Educational Plant Survey shall be consistent with the requirements of Section
1013.33, F.S. Upon receipt of the Educational Plant Survey, PTAC will have twenty
(20) days to evaluate and make recommendations regarding the location and
need for new schools, significant renovation or expansion, and closures of
educational facilities, and the consistency of such plans with the local government
comprehensive plan and relevant issues listed in Subsections 5.2, 5.3, 6.1, and
8.1 of this Agreement.
SECTION 5 SCHOOL SITE SELECTION, REMODELING, AND SCHOOL
CLOSURES
1781
Winter Springs Proposed Draft 5.11.2022
Page 10 of 39
5.1 New School Sites. When the need for a new school within the City of Winter
Springs is identified in the School Board’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan,
PTAC will review a list of potential sites in the area of need. Potential sites for new
schools will be submitted to the local government with jurisdiction City for an
assessment regarding consistency with the local government Comprehensive
Plan. This jurisdiction The City shall have 20 days upon receipt of the request to
respond with a consistency determination. If the site is consistent with the local
government comprehensive plan, and the School Board authorizes the acquisition
of the property, the School Board shall proceed through the appropriate site plan
review process. If a determination is made that a proposed school site is not
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the local government shall identify
whether it will support necessary amendments to the comprehensive plan to make
the school site consistent. The coordination process shall be in accordance with
Chapter 1013.33 F.S.
5.2 School Site Plan Review. Once a school site has been selected and site design
has begun, the School Board shall comply with the appropriate site plan review
process set forth within the applicable land development regulations. Nothing in
this agreement exempts school sites from the site plan review process and
ensuring the site plan is consistent with both the comprehensive plan and land
development regulations. Standards and conditions shall not be imposed which
conflict with the requirements established in Chapter 1013 F.S. or the Florida
Building Code, unless otherwise agreed to by the School Board as a part of this
Agreement.
A. The School Board shall not be required to obtain or condemn public right-
of-way from private property owners for the purposes of constructing off-
site infrastructure of which it is intended that fee simple title of the acquired
right-of-way be transferred to the County or City.
B. The County and Cities City shall exempt the School Board from the
payment of planning and development fees, including but not limited to plan
amendment fees, zoning and/or site plan fees, special exception fees,
right-of-way utilization fees, permit fees, subdivision fees, and vacate fees,
as may be required by the County or Cities City in the development review
process. The School Board shall be responsible for the payment of fees
associated with advertising related public hearings.
C. The County and Cities City shall accept the St. Johns River Water
Management District permit for an educational facility to find that storm
water collection, treatment, retention and drainage within a school site is
sufficient. If off-site impacts are present, the County or City having
jurisdiction may impose conditions on the application as provided in the
jurisdiction’s land development regulations.
5.3 Remodeling and Closures. When the need for a remodeling project that changes
the primary use of a facility, resulting in a greater than 15 percent increase or
decrease in student capacity, or the closure of a school has been identified in the
School Board Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan, PTAC shall notify the PSFPC
and make recommendations on the impacts the renovation or closure will have on
the adopted level of service for schools. If a 5% or greater reduction of capacity is
proposed for a High School, the local government(s) with jurisdiction within the
impacted CSA will be notified.
1782
Winter Springs Proposed Draft 5.11.2022
Page 11 of 39
5.4 Joint Consideration of Off-Site Improvements. In conjunction with the land use
consistency determination described in Subsection 5.1 of this Agreement, the
School Board and the effected local government will jointly determine the need for
and timing of off-site improvements necessary to support each new school or the
proposed remodeling of an existing school. The School Board and the effected
local government will agree to the timing, location, and the party or parties
responsible for financing constructing, operating and maintaining the required
improvements.
5.5 Expansion, Renovation, or Construction. When there is to be an expansion of
an existing school site, or renovation or construction on an existing site, the School
Board and the applicable local government shall follow the coordination
requirements set forth by law, including, but not limited to Section 1013, F.S.
SECTION 6 LOCAL PLANNING AGENCIES (LPA), COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AMENDMENTS, REZONINGS, AND DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS
6.1 Appointed LPA Members. Pursuant to Section 163.3174, Florida Statutes, The
County and Cities City will include School Board representative on the local
planning agencies, or equivalent agencies, to attend those meetings at which the
agendas consider comprehensive plan amendments and rezonings that would, if
approved, increase residential density on the property that is the subject of the
application. The Cities and County City may at their discretion grant voting status
to the appointed School Board representative.
6.2 County and City Development Applications Shared with the School Board.
The County and the Cities City shall give the District Superintendent notification of
land use applications and development proposals pending before them that may
affect student enrollment, enrollment projections, or school facilities in accordance
with Section 12 of this Agreement. Such notice will be provided within 10 days with
receipt of the application. This notice requirement applies to amendments to the
comprehensive plan future land use map, rezonings, developments of regional
impact, and/or major residential or mixed-use development projects.
6.3 Criteria for Evaluating Residential Development Applications. The County
and Cities City will consider the following issues, in addition to the review process
for school concurrency described in Section 12, when reviewing Comprehensive
Plan amendments and rezonings for residential development proposals:
A. School Board comments on residential development proposals.
B. The provision of school sites and facilities within neighborhoods.
C. The compatibility of land uses adjacent to existing schools and reserved
school sites.
D. The co-location of parks, recreation and neighborhood facilities with school
sites.
E. The linkage of schools, parks, libraries and other public facilities with
bikeways, trails, and sidewalks for safe access.
6.4 Formulating City and County Plans and Programs. In formulating community
development plans and programs, the County and Cities City will consider the
following issues:
1783
Winter Springs Proposed Draft 5.11.2022
Page 12 of 39
A. Scheduling of capital improvements that are coordinated with and meet the
capital needs identified in the School Board’s Five–Year Capital
Improvement Plan.
B. Providing incentives to the private sector to identify and implement creative
solutions to developing adequate school facilities in residential
developments.
C. Targeting community development improvements in older and distressed
neighborhoods near schools; and
D. Working to address and resolve multi-jurisdictional public-school issues.
SECTION 7 CO-LOCATION AND SHARED USE
7.1 Co-Location and Shared Use. The co-location and shared use of facilities are
important to both the School Board and local governments. Pursuant to Section
163.31777(2)(g), F.S., the School Board will seek opportunities to co-locate and
share use of school facilities and civic facilities when preparing the Board’s Five–
Year Capital Improvement Plan. Likewise, co-location and shared use
opportunities will be considered by the local governments City when preparing the
annual update to the Comprehensive Plan's schedule of capital improvements and
when planning and designing new, or renovating existing, community facilities.
Opportunities for co-location and shared use with public schools will be considered
for the following:
A. Libraries;
B. Parks and recreation facilities;
C. Community centers;
D. Auditoriums;
E. Learning centers;
F. Museums;
G. Performing arts centers;
H. Stadiums; and
I. Governmental facilities.
7.2 Mutual Use Agreement. For each instance of co-location and shared use, the
School Board and local government shall enter into a separate agreement which
addresses liability, operating and maintenance costs, scheduling of use, and
facility supervision or any other issues that may arise from co-location and shared
use.
SECTION 8 SPECIFIC RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARTIES
8.1 Specific Responsibilities of the County and Cities City . When the
Comprehensive Plan amendments adopted in accordance with this Agreement
1784
Winter Springs Proposed Draft 5.11.2022
Page 13 of 39
become effective, the County and Cities City shall undertake the following
activities:
A. Adopt the required school concurrency provisions into their Land
Development Regulations (LDR) consistent with the time frame established
by law, the requirements of this Agreement, and the County and Cities’
City’s Comprehensive Plans, unless electing to be bound by the provisions
established by the County.
B. Withhold the approval of any site plan, final subdivision, or functional
equivalent for new residential units not exempted under Section 12.1(c) of
this Agreement, until the School Board has reported that there is school
capacity available or a Development Agreement for Mitigation has been
reached.
C. Share information with the School Board regarding population projections,
projections of development and redevelopment for the coming year,
infrastructure required to support educational facilities, and amendments to
future land use plan elements consistent with the requirements of this
Agreement.
D. Maintain data for approved new residential development. The data shall be
provided to the School Board annually by October 15th, and include at a
minimum, the following:
1. Development name and location.
2. Total number of dwelling units by unit type as defined in the most
recently adopted public schools impact fee ordinance.
3. Impact fee tabulation as provided by the County.
4. Total number of dwelling units with certificates of occupancy (CO)
by Development by date.
E. Transmit site plans, final subdivision or functional equivalency for approved
new residential development upon request by the School Board.
8.2 Specific Responsibilities of the School Board. By entering into this Agreement,
the School Board agrees to undertake the following activities:
A. Annually prepare and update a Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan to
meet the anticipated demand for student stations identified by the COFTE.
B. Consider school attendance boundary adjustments as may be appropriate
to maximize the utilization of capacity in order to ensure that all schools of
each type (elementary, middle, high) in each Concurrency Service Area
and each individual school operate at the adopted level of service,
consistent with the requirements of this Agreement and School Board
Policy po5120 – School Attendance Zones and Interzone Transfers.
Initiation of attendance boundaries shall be at the sole discretion of the
School Board.
C. Plan capacity enhancing and remodeling projects necessary to maintain
the adopted level of service consistent with the Five-Year CIP.
1785
Winter Springs Proposed Draft 5.11.2022
Page 14 of 39
D. Provide the County and Cities City with the required data and analysis
updated annually to support the comprehensive plan elements and any
amendments relating to school concurrency.
E. Adopt a five- and ten-year CIP consistent with the requirements of this
Agreement.
F. Review proposed new residential developments for compliance with
concurrency standards, consistent with the requirements of this
Agreement.
G. Consider and approve Development Agreement for Mitigation options for
new residential development as appropriate.
H. Prepare annual reports on enrollment and capacity, consistent with the
requirements of this Agreement.
I. Provide necessary staff and material support for meetings of the PSFPC
as required by this Agreement.
J. Provide information to the County and Cities City regarding enrollment
projections, school siting, infrastructure necessary to support educational
facilities, and amendments to future land use plan elements consistent with
the requirements of this Agreement.
SECTION 9 SCHOOL BOARD CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
9.1 School Board’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan. In preparation of the
School Board’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan and each annual update, the
School Board shall undertake the following:
A. Update and adopt the School Board’s Five–Year Capital Improvement Plan
for public schools in Seminole County on or before September 30th of each
year.
B. Specify all new construction, remodeling or renovation projects which will
add permanent capacity or modernize existing facilities.
C. Prepare the School Board’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan and each
annual update to provide a financially feasible program of school
construction for a five (5) year period.
1. Include school construction projects which, when completed, will
add sufficient capacity to achieve and maintain the adopted LOS
standard for all schools based on the projected COFTE enrollment;
provide for required modernizations; and satisfy the School Board’s
constitutional obligation to provide a uniform system of free public
schools on a county-wide basis.
2. Include a description of each school project, in the School Board’s
Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan.
D. Maximize utilization of existing schools so that proposed projects add the
necessary capacity to maintain the adopted Level of Service standard.
1786
Winter Springs Proposed Draft 5.11.2022
Page 15 of 39
E. The School Board’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan and each annual
update shall consider the projected enrollment, capacity and utilization
percentage of all schools.
9.2 Educational Facilities Work Plan. In addition to the adopted School Board’s Five-
Year Capital Improvement Plan, the School Board shall annually adopt a five-year
and ten-year work plan based upon revenue projections, COFTE enrollment
projections and facility needs for the five-year and ten-year period. It is recognized
that the projections in the five- and ten-year time frames are tentative and should
be used only for general planning purposes. Upon completion, the Educational
Facilities Work Plan will be transmitted to the local governments.
9.3 Transmittal. The School Board shall transmit to the County, the local governments
and the PSFPC copies of the proposed Educational Facilities Work Plan and the
Five-Year CIP for review and comment. Transmittal to the PSFPC, the Cities and
the County City shall occur during first quarter of each school year commencing
after the effective date of this Agreement.
9.4 Adoption. Unless the adoption is delayed by mediation, delayed receipt of data
from FDOE, or a lawful challenge, the School Board shall adopt their Five-Year
Capital Improvement Plan no later than September 30th, and it shall become
effective no later than October 1st of each year.
SECTION 10 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ELEMENTS
10.1 Required Comprehensive Plan Amendments. The County and the Cities City
agrees to adopt the following Comprehensive Plan amendments no later than ten
(10) calendar months following the effective date of this Agreement.
A. An amended Capital Improvement Element (CIE) that includes the portion
of the adopted School Board’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan dealing
with capacity improvements. The amended information will be adopted by
the local jurisdictions no later than December 31st following the annual
adoption of the Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan by the School Board.
This will ensure that the CIE uniformly sets forth a financially feasible public
school capital facilities program, consistent with the adopted Level of
Service standards for public schools.
B. A Public School Facilities Element (PSFE) consistent with the requirements
of Section 163.3180(6) F.S. and this Agreement.
C. An amended Intergovernmental Coordination Element as required by
Section 163.3177(6)(h)1 and 2 F.S. and this Agreement.
D. Each jurisdiction’s amendments shall be consistent with this Agreement,
and those adopted by the other jurisdictions as required by Section
163.3180, F.S.
10.2 Development, Adoption, and Amendment of the Capital Improvements
Element (CIE). An annual update or any amendment to the School Board’s
Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan by the School Board, once adopted by the
School Board, shall be transmitted to the County and the CitiesCity . The City
County and the Cities shall adopt the capacity portions of the School Board’s Five-
Year Capital Improvement Plan into the Capital Improvement Element of their
Comprehensive Plans.
1787
Winter Springs Proposed Draft 5.11.2022
Page 16 of 39
A. The County and the Cities City , by adopting the capacity portions of “The
Seminole County Public School’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan” in
the Capital Improvements Element of the Local Government’s
Comprehensive Plan, shall have neither the obligation nor the
responsibility for funding or accomplishing the School Board Five-Year
Capital Improvement Plan.
SECTION 11 SCHOOL CONCURRENCY PROGRAM
11.1 Commencement of School Concurrency. The School Concurrency Program
described in this Agreement shall commence on the EFFECTIVE DATE.
11.2 Concurrency Service Areas (CSA). The Parties hereby agree that School
Concurrency shall be measured and applied using a geographic area known as a
Concurrency Service Area (CSA) which coincides with groupings of school
attendance zones within each school type based on adjacency, as established in
this Agreement. The designation of the specific school attendance zones
comprising each of the CSAs are provided in Appendix “A” of this Agreement.
A. CSA service area boundaries, together with the standards for establishing
those boundaries, will be identified in the Comprehensive Plans of each
City and the County pursuant to Section 163.3180(6)(f)2.a., F.S. The
designation of the specific school attendance zones comprising each of
the CSAs will be included as support documents used as a basis for or in
developing the local comprehensive plan . The comprehensive plan will
include a statement advising that in order to determine the geographic
boundary of each CSA, current School Board attendance zone maps for
each school included within each CSA must be consulted.
B. The following standards shall apply to the composition of CSAs:
1. In Order to maximize school capacity, each elementary CSA must
include a minimum of two elementary schools: and
2. When a new elementary school opens it may be placed in the CSA that
includes the most proximate existing elementary school with consideration
of the goals established in School Board Policy po5120 to include, but not
be limited to, minimizing the duration of travel time and distance while not
placing a transportation burden on any identifiable diversity sub group
(social economic, race/ethnicity, ESOL, or disability): and
3. The capacity at county-wide Magnet Schools shall not be attributed to
the available capacity for the CSA in which the county wide Magnet School
is located.
C. As future school attendance zone changes are required for schools
programmed in the Seminole School Board Five-Year Capital Improvement
Plan, the CSAs shall automatically be modified to the greatest extent
possible so as to provide maximum utilization.
D. Any Party may propose a change to the CSA boundaries or the designation
of which individual school attendance zones comprise the CSAs. Prior to
adopting any change to a CSA, the School Board must verify that as a
result of the change:
1788
Winter Springs Proposed Draft 5.11.2022
Page 17 of 39
1. The adopted level of service standards will be achieved and
maintained for each year of the five-year planning period; and
2. The utilization of Program School Capacity will be maximized to the
greatest extent possible, taking into account transportation costs,
and other relevant factors.
E. The Parties shall observe the following process for modifying CSA School
Designations:
1. Changes in school attendance zone boundaries shall be governed
by School Board Policy po5120 – School Attendance Zones and
Interzone Transfers, Section 120.54 F.S. and applicable uniform
rules governing rulemaking and administrative proceedings. Prior
to the School Board holding an initial public meeting to consider
whether to begin the School Attendance Zone revision process, the
School Board will notify the Local Government(s) with jurisdiction
within the impacted CSA of the proposed revision.
2. At such time as the School Board determines that modification to a
school(s) attendance zone boundary is appropriate, the School
Board shall make public the revised attendance zone boundary and
shall provide notice of the proposed changes to the Cities, to the
County the City, and to the PSFPC.
3. Not Used. Changes in school attendance zone boundaries
occurring by administrative rezone shall require prior written notice
to the City, and a presentation regarding the change by the School
Board before the City Commission at a public meeting, at least thirty
(30) days prior to the change becoming effective if the change will
impact any of the CSAs referenced in this Agreement.
4. Concurrency Service Area geographic boundaries shall conform to
revised school attendance zone boundaries and shall become
effective upon final adoption of the modified school attendance
zone boundaries by the School Board pursuant to School Board
Policy po5120 – School Attendance Zones and Interzone
Transfers, but shall not require amendment to this Agreement or to
the local government jurisdiction’s comprehensive plan.
5. To become effective, any proposed change to CSA boundaries that:
a. is not a CSA boundary change resulting from a School
Board modification to school attendance zone geographic
boundaries pursuant to School Board Policy po5120 –
School Attendance Zones and Interzone Transfers; or
b. is a proposed change to the designation of which individual
school attendance zones comprise the various CSAs,
must be reviewed by the PTAC, the PSFPC, and approved by all
Parties as an amendment to this Agreement.
11.3 Level of Service (LOS) Standard. To ensure the capacity of schools is sufficient
to support student growth, the County, Cities City and School Board shall adopt a
1789
Winter Springs Proposed Draft 5.11.2022
Page 18 of 39
LOS standard for schools. The Parties hereby agree that the maximum LOS
standard shall be the Program School Capacity for each school type within each
CSA.
11.4 School Concurrency Regulations. Each Local Government The City shall adopt
school concurrency provisions into its land development regulations (LDRs)
consistent with the requirements of this Agreement.
A. The County and the Cities City shall amend their LDRs to adopt school
concurrency provisions for the review of development approvals within 18
months of the effective date.
1. In the event that any participating City does not adopt LDRs within
18 months, that government shall be deemed to have “opted in” to
the County regulations and agrees to be bound by the terms and
provisions therein until it adopts its own ordinance.
2. At any time, any Local Government may opt out of the County’s
implementing ordinance through implementing its own ordinance.
SECTION 12 UNIFORM SCHOOL CONCURRENCY PROCESS
12.1 General Provisions. The County, the Cities City and the School Board shall
ensure that the Level of Service Standard established for each school type is
maintained.
A. No site plan, final subdivision, or functional equivalent for new residential
development may be approved by the County or Cities City, unless the
residential development is exempt from these requirements as provided in
Section 12.1(c) of this Agreement, or until a School Capacity Availability
Letter Determination (SCALD) has been issued by the School Board to the
local government indicating that adequate school facilities exist.
B. A local government The City may condition the approval of the residential
development to ensure that necessary school facilities are in place. This
shall not limit the authority of a local government the City to deny a site
plan, final subdivision or its functional equivalent, pursuant to its home rule
regulatory powers.
C. The following residential uses shall be considered exempt from the
requirements of school concurrency:
1. Any amendment to any previously approved residential
development, which does not increase the number of dwelling units
or change the type of dwelling units (single-family, multi-family,
etc.).
2. Any community subject to a restrictive covenant on all residential
units that results in no permanent residents under the age of
eighteen (18)..
3. De minimus impact residential single-family developments with four
(4) or less units, or multi-family developments with eight (8) or less
units. Such de minimus impact exempt developments would still be
1790
Winter Springs Proposed Draft 5.11.2022
Page 19 of 39
required to go through other approval processes required by the
local government(s).
D. Any new residential development that received a passing School Capacity
Availability Letter of Determination (“SCALD”) prior to the effective date of
this Agreement will remain under the terms and conditions established in
the Agreement when the SCALD was received and will not be required to
apply for a new SCALD under this Agreement or be subject to the time
deadlines and forfeiture provisions set forth in Section 12.7 below.
E. Upon request by a developer submitting a land development application
with a residential component, the School Board shall issue a determination
as to whether or not a development, lot or unit is exempt from the
requirements of school concurrency and submit a copy of the determination
to the local government within 10 days.
12.2 School Concurrency Application Review
A. A developer may request a preliminary school capacity assessment from
the School Board, which will provide the developer with the school capacity
available at the time of the preliminary assessment, but will not reserve
capacity and will not bind the School Board in subsequent capacity
determinations.
B. Any developer submitting a development permit application (such as site
plan or final subdivision) with a residential component that is not exempt
under Section 12.1(C) or 12.1(D) of this Agreement is subject to school
concurrency and shall prepare and submit a SCALD Application to the
School Board for review. The SCALD Application form shall be obtained
from the School Board.
C. The SCALD Application shall indicate the location of the development, the
number of dwelling units by unit type (single-family detached, single family
attached (townhomes/condominiums), multi-family with unit sizes, and
mobile homes), a phasing schedule (if applicable), and age restrictions for
occupancy (if any). The School Board concurrency test shall follow the
following steps:
1. Test Submittal. The developer shall submit a SCALD Application
to the School Board with a copy to the local government with
jurisdiction over the proposed development. The completed
SCALD Application must be submitted a minimum of five days but
not more than 30 days prior to Development Application submittal
to the local government. The School Board shall perform a
sufficiency review on the SCALD Application. An incomplete
SCALD Application will be returned to the Owner/Developer without
processing. The School Board will have 20 days to determine
sufficiency and complete the Test Review. The School Board may
charge the applicant a non-refundable application fee payable to
1791
Winter Springs Proposed Draft 5.11.2022
Page 20 of 39
the School Board to meet the cost of review in accordance with
Florida Statutes.
2. Test Review. Each SCALD Application will be reviewed in the order
in which it is received by the School Board.
3. Passing the Test. If the available capacity of public schools for
each type within the CSA [or contiguous Alternate CSAs as
provided for in 12.2(C) below] containing the proposed project is
equal to or greater than the proposed project’s needed capacity, the
concurrency test is passed. The School Board will issue a SCALD
identifying the school capacity available to serve the proposed
project, indicating that said capacity has been reserved for the
proposed project, and containing a warning that reserved capacity
will be forfeited if the developer fails to meet the time deadlines set
forth in Section 12.7, below..
4, Forfeiture of reserved capacity. If developer fails to meet the time
deadlines set forth in Section 12.7 below, the reserved capacity will
be forfeited and the developer must resubmit a new SCALD
Application.
5. Failing the Test. If the available capacity of public schools for
any type within the CSA (or if identified in Appendix “A,” a
contiguous Alternate CSAs as provided for in Section 12.3(c)
below) containing the proposed project is less than the proposed
project’s needed capacity, the concurrency test is failed. The
School Board will issue a SCALD informing the developer that
capacity is not available and advising the developer of the following
options:
a. Accept a 30 day temporary reservation of available school
capacity, and within the same 30-day period, amend the
Development Application to balance it with the available
capacity. The time deadlines set forth in Section 12.7 will be
tolled until the Development Application has been amended
or the temporary reservation of capacity has expired,
whichever is earlier; or
b. Accept a 60 day temporary reservation of available school
capacity, and within the same 60 day period, negotiate and
agree with the School Board and the local government on a
Development Agreement for Mitigation plan as outlined in
Section 12.5 below. The time deadlines set forth in Section
12.7 will be tolled until an agreed Development Agreement
has been finalized or rejected by the local government board
or commission, or the 60 day temporary reservation of
capacity has expired without agreement, whichever is
earlier; or
c. Appeal the results of the failed test pursuant to the
provisions in Section 12.8 below; or
d. Withdraw the SCALD Application.
1792
Winter Springs Proposed Draft 5.11.2022
Page 21 of 39
6. Test Abandonment. If no option under Section 12.2(B)(5) above is
selected by the developer within 15 days following issuance of the
SCALD, then the SCALD Application shall be deemed abandoned.
12.3 Methodology. The methodology for performing the concurrency test shall follow
the steps outlined below:
A. To determine a proposed development’s projected students, the proposed
development’s projected number and type of residential units shall be
converted into projected students for all schools of each type within the
specific CSA using the adopted Student Generation Multiplier, as
established in the most current adopted Seminole County Educational
System Impact Fee Ordinance and Seminole County Public Schools
Impact Fee Study Update.
B. New school capacity within a CSA which is in place or planned for
construction in the first three years of the School Board’s Capital
Improvement Plan will be added to the capacity shown in the CSA, and is
counted as available capacity for the residential development under review.
C. If the projected student growth from a residential development causes the
adopted LOS to be exceeded in the CSA within which the proposed
development is located, another adjacent CSA or an Alternate CSA, if
either is identified in Appendix “A” for the type of school, which is
contiguous with and touches the boundary of, the concurrency service area
within which the proposed development is located shall be evaluated for
available capacity. If applicable, Aan adjacency evaluation review of
another CSA or Alternate CSA shall be conducted as follows:
1. In conducting the adjacency review, the School Board shall first use
the applicable adjacent CSA or Alternate CSA with the most
available capacity to evaluate projected enrollment impact. and, if
necessary, shall continue to the next adjacent CSA with the next
most available capacity.
2. Consistent with Rule 6A-3.0171 F.A.C., at no time shall the shift of
impact to an adjacent an another CSA or Alternate CSA result in a
total morning or afternoon transportation time of either elementary
or secondary students to exceed fifty (50) minutes or one (1) hour,
respectively. The transportation time shall be determined by the
School Board transportation routing system and measured from the
school the impact is to be assigned, to the center of the subject
parcel/plat in the amendment application, along the most direct
improved pubic roadway free from major hazards.
12.4 Development Review Table. The School Board shall create and maintain a
Development Review Table (DRT) for each CSA, and will use the DRT to compare
the projected students from proposed residential developments to the CSAs
available capacity programmed within the first three years of the current f ive-year
capital planning period.
A. Student enrollment projections shall be based on the most recently adopted
School Board Capital Facilities Work Program, and the DRT shall be
updated to reflect these projections. Available capacity shall be derived
using the following formula:
1793
Winter Springs Proposed Draft 5.11.2022
Page 22 of 39
Available Capacity = School Capacity¹ – (Enrollment² + Approved³)
Where:
¹School Capacity = Program School Capacity as programmed in the first
three (3) years of the School Board’s Five-Year CIP
²Enrollment = Student enrollment as counted at the Fall Semester
Student Count.
³Approved = Students generated from approved residential developments
after the implementation of school concurrency
B. Using the Fall Semester Student Count, the vested number of students on
the DRT will be reduced by the number of students represented by the
residential units that received certificates of occupancy within the previous
twelve (12) month period.
12.5 Development Agreement for Mitigation. In the event there is not available
school capacity to support a development, the School Board will entertain
Development Agreement for Mitigation options consistent with Section
163.3180(6)(h), F.S., and, if accepted, shall enter into an enforceable and binding
agreement with the developer to mitigate the impact from the development through
the creation of additional school capacity.
A. When the anticipated student impacts from a proposed development cause
the adopted LOS to be exceeded, the developer’s mitigation agreement will
be based on the number of additional student stations necessary to achieve
the established LOS. The amount to be paid will be calculated by the cost
per student station for elementary, middle and high school as determined
and published by the State of Florida.
B. The methodology used to calculate a Development Agreement for
Mitigation credits shall be as follows:
Development Mitigation Share = (¹Development students - Available
Capacity) x 2Total Cost per student station
Where:
¹Development students = those students from the development that are
assigned to a CSA and have triggered a deficiency of the available
capacity.
2Total Cost = the cost per student station as determined and published by
Seminole County Public Schools School Impact Fee Study Update in effect
as of the date of issuance of the SCALD.
C. The applicant shall accept a 60 day encumbrance of available school
capacity, and within the same 60 day period enter into negotiations with the
Local Government(s) with jurisdiction in the effected CSA and the School
Board in an effort to mitigate the impact from the development through the
creation of additional capacity. Upon identification and acceptance of a
mitigation option deemed financially feasible by the Local Government(s)
with jurisdiction in the effected CSA and the School Board, the developer
shall enter into a binding and enforceable development agreement with the
1794
Winter Springs Proposed Draft 5.11.2022
Page 23 of 39
Local Government(s) with jurisdiction in the effected CSA and the School
Board.
1. A mitigation contribution provided by a developer to offset the
impact of a residential development must be directed by the School
Board toward a school capacity project identified in the School
Board’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan.
2. If capacity projects are planned in years four (4) or five (5) of the
School Board’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan within
the same CSA as the proposed residential development, the
developer may pay his proportionate share to mitigate the proposed
development in accordance with the formula provided in Section
12.5 (B) of this Agreement.
3. If a capacity project does not exist in the Capital Improvement Plan,
the School Board will add a capacity project to satisfy the impacts
from a proposed residential development, if it is funded through the
developer’s proportionate share mitigation contributions. Mitigation
options may include, but are not limited to:
a. Contribution of land or payment for land acquisition suitable
for and in conjunction with, the provision of additional school
capacity or through application of County education system
impact fee credits pursuant to Seminole County Ordinance
2018‐1, section 105.46; or
b. Mitigation banking based on the construction of an
educational facility in exchange for the right to receive
impact fee credits; or
c. Provide modular or permanent student stations acceptable
for use as an educational facility; or
d. Provide additional student stations through the remodeling
of existing buildings acceptable for use as an educational
facility; or
e. Construction or expansion of permanent student stations at
the impacted school within the CSA; or
f. Construction of an educational facility in advance of the time
set forth in the School Board’s Five-Year Capital
Improvement Plan.
D. For mitigation measures (a) thru (f) above, the estimated cost of the
mitigating capacity will reflect the estimated future costs at the time of the
anticipated construction. Improvements contributed by the developer shall
receive school impact fee credit.
E. Developer shall receive an impact fee credit for the proportionate share
mitigation. Credits will be given for that portion of the impact fees that would
have been used to fund the improvements on which the proportionate fair
share contribution was calculated. The portion of impact fees available for
the credit will be based on the historic Seminole County Impact Fee
Ordinance’s distribution of impact fee funds to the school type (elementary,
1795
Winter Springs Proposed Draft 5.11.2022
Page 24 of 39
middle, high) in the appropriate CSAs. Impact fee credits shall be
calculated at the same time as the applicant’s proportionate share
obligation is calculated. Impact fee credits may be transferred pursuant to
Section 163.31801, Florida Statutes.
F. A proportionate share mitigation contribution shall not be subsequently
amended or refunded after final site plan or plat approval to reflect a
reduction in planned or constructed residential density.
G. Impact fees shall be credited against the proportionate share mitigation
total.
H. Any proportionate share mitigation must be directed by the School Board
toward a school capacity improvement identified in the School Board’s
Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan.
I. Upon conclusion of the negotiation period, a second School Capacity
Availability Letter of Determination (SCALD) shall be issued. If mitigation is
agreed to, the School Board shall issue a new Determination Letter
approving the development subject to those mitigation measures agreed to
by the local government, developer and the School Board. Prior to, site
plan approval, final subdivision approval or the functional equivalent, the
mitigation measures shall be memorialized in an enforceable and binding
agreement with the local government, the School Board and the Developer
that specifically details mitigation provisions to be paid for by the developer
and the relevant terms and conditions. If mitigation is not agreed to, the
Determination Letter shall detail why any mitigation proposals were
rejected and why the development is not in compliance with school
concurrency requirements. A SCALD indicating either that adequate
capacity is available, or that there is not a negotiated proportionate share
mitigation settlement following the sixty (60) day negotiation period as
described in Section 12.7(B) of this Agreement, constitutes final agency
action by the School Board for purposes of Chapter 120, F.S.
12.6 School Concurrency Approval. Issuance of a SCALD by the School Board
identifying that adequate capacity exists indicates only that school facilities are
currently available, and capacity for the proposed development has been reserved.
A. A local government shall not issue a Development approval for a residential
development until receiving confirmation of available school capacity in the
form of a SCALD from the School Board. The Development approval shall
include a reference to the findings of the SCALD indicating that the project
meets school concurrency.
B. Local governments shall notify the School Board within fifteen (15) days of
any official change in the validity (status) of a Development Approval for a
residential development that has received a SCALD.
C. The Local Government shall not issue a building permit or its functional
equivalent for a non-exempt residential development until receiving
confirmation of available school capacity from the School Board in the form
of a SCALD.
1796
Winter Springs Proposed Draft 5.11.2022
Page 25 of 39
12.7 Reserved Capacity. School capacity will be reserved when the School District
issues the SCALD. If the local government denies the Development Application,
then the Development’s reserved school capacity is forfeited. The Development’s
reserved school capacity will be forfeited if the development approval or building
permit is terminated or expires, or if development fails to meet any of the following
time deadlines:
A. The development application submittal is not submitted to the local
government with jurisdiction within thirty (30) days following the date of
issuance of the SCALD.
B. Vertical Construction of a portion of the Project associated with residential
units has not commenced within two (2) years following issuance of
SCALD. This deadline will be extended by School Board for one (1)
additional year if the development application is still under review by the
local government and upon the recommendation of the local government
with jurisdiction;
C. Construction of the development identified in the SCALD has not been
completed within four (4) years of the commencement of construction. This
deadline may be extended by School Board for one (1) additional year upon
the recommendation of the local government with jurisdiction.
It is the developer’s responsibility to provide written notice to the School Board that
each of the above time deadlines has been met. The School Board will provide the
developer with thirty (30) days advanced written notice prior to forfeiture of the
developer’s reserved capacity in the event the developer does not satisfy 12.7 B.
or C.
12.8 Appeal Process. A person substantially affected by a School Board’s adequate
capacity determination made as a part of the School Concurrency Process may
appeal such determination through the process provided in Chapter 120, F.S.,
Administrative Procedure Act.
SECTION 13 OVERSIGHT
13.1 Oversight. The PSFPC will serve as the required oversight committee for school
concurrency to monitor and evaluate the school concurrency program.
The committee shall meet at a minimum once annually in accordance with the laws
of Florida governing public meetings, and report to participating local governments,
the School Board and the general public on the effectiveness with which this
Agreement is being implemented. The PSFPC representative from the Seminole
County School Board shall act as the chairperson. A designee of the School Board
shall be responsible for coordinating the PSFPC meetings.
A. The monitoring and evaluation of the school concurrency process is
required pursuant to Section 163.3180(6)(i)4c, F.S., and Section 2 of this
Agreement. The PSFPC shall be responsible for evaluating this Agreement
and the effectiveness of the School Concurrency System. Commencing in
2025, upon completion of each periodic Seminole County Impact Fee
Study Update pursuant to the Land Development Code of Seminole
County, Chapter 105, “Education System Impact Fees”, the PSFPC shall
evaluate the effectiveness of the CSAs for measuring LOS and consider
1797
Winter Springs Proposed Draft 5.11.2022
Page 26 of 39
making recommendations to amend this Agreement. The failure of the
PSFPC to initiate this review in a timely manner shall not affect the validity
of this Agreement.
B. The PSFPC members shall receive copies of all reports and documents
produced pursuant to this Agreement.
C. During the first quarter of each school year, the PSFPC shall receive the
proposed School Board’s District Educational Facilities Work Plan and the
Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan. The PSFPC will report to the School
Board, the County, and the Cities City on whether or not the proposed
Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan maintains the adopted Level of
Service in each CSA.
SECTION 14 SPECIAL PROVISIONS
14.1 School Board Requirements. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the
School Board is or may be subject to the requirements of the Florida and United
States Constitutions and other state or federal statutes regarding the operation of
the public school system and the rules by the State Board of Education or
Commissioner of Education.
Accordingly, the County, the Cities City and the School Board agree that this
Agreement is not intended, and will not be construed, to interfere with, hinder, or
obstruct in any manner, the School Board’s constitutional and statutory obligation
and sovereignty to provide a uniform system of free public schools on a
Countywide basis or to require the School Board to confer with, or obtain the
consent of, the County or the CitiesCity, as to whether that obligation has been
satisfied. Further, the County, the Cities City and the School Board agree that this
Agreement is not intended and will not be construed to impose any duty or
obligation on the County or City for the School Board’s constitutional or statutory
obligation. The County and the Cities City also acknowledges that the School
Board’s obligations under this Agreement may be superseded by state or federal
court orders or other state or federal legal mandates.
14.2 Land Use Authority. The Parties specifically acknowledge that each Local
Government the City is responsible for approving or denying comprehensive plan
amendments and development approvals within its own jurisdiction. Nothing
herein represents or authorizes a transfer of any of this authority to the School
Board.
SECTION 15 AMENDMENT PROCESS, NOTICE, AND TERM OF AGREEMENT
15.1 Amendment of the Agreement. This Agreement may be amended by written
consent of no less than eighty-eight percent (88%) of all Parties to this Agreement
with the exception of the provisions noted below. The Agreement will remain in
effect until amended in accordance with Florida Statutes.
A. Amendment of Section 11.2.B shall require the written consent of all parties.
B. The repeal of School Concurrency shall require the written consent of all
Parties.
C. A. Amendment of any part of the Agreement that, upon the School Board’s
reasonable determination, would necessitate a revision of school attendance
zones requires the consent of the School Board. The School Board must consider
alternatives to revision of attendance zones that would create voluntary student
1798
Winter Springs Proposed Draft 5.11.2022
Page 27 of 39
transfers before determining whether the proposed amendment would necessitate
a revision of school attendance zones. Nothing in this section shall be interpreted
as infringing on the School board’s absolute right to determine school attendance
zones in accordance with Florida law and School Board policy.
D. Amendment of this Section 15.1 shall require the written consent of all Parties.
15.2 Notice Requirements. Any notices provided pursuant to this Agreement shall be
sent to the following addresses:
City Manager
City of Altamonte Springs
225 Newburyport Avenue
Altamonte Springs, Florida 32701
City Manager
City of Casselberry
95 Triplet Lake Drive
Casselberry, Florida 32707
City Manager
City of Lake Mary
100 North Country Club Road
Lake Mary, Florida 32746
City Manager
City of Longwood
175 West Warren Avenue
Longwood, Florida 32750
City Manager
City of Oviedo
400 Alexandria Boulevard
Oviedo, Florida 32765
City Manager
City of Sanford
300 North Park Avenue
Sanford, Florida 32771
City Manager
City of Winter Springs
1126 East State Road 434
Winter Springs, Florida 32708
County Manager
Seminole County Government
1101 East First Street
Sanford, Florida 32771
School Board Superintendent
Seminole County School Board
400 East Lake Mary Boulevard
Sanford, Florida 32773
15.3 Repeal of the Agreement. If the Florida Statute as it pertains to school planning
coordination and school concurrency is repealed, the Agreement may be
terminated by written consent of all parties of this Agreement.
15.4 Termination of the Agreement. This Agreement may be terminated by mutual
written agreement of the City and School Board. If terminated, written notice of
said termination shall be provided by the parties to the Florida Department of
Economic Opportunity. No party to this Agreement may terminate its participation
in the agreement except through the exemption process in which a municipality
may not be required to participate in school concurrency when demonstrating that
all the requirements are no longer having a significant impact on school attendance
at the time of a local government Evaluation and Appraisal Report, by providing a
sixty (60) day written notice to other parties and to the Florida Department of
Economic Opportunity.
15.5 Withdrawal. Withdrawal from the Agreement by any party shall not alter the terms
of the Agreement with respect to the remaining signatories.
SECTION 16 RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES
1799
Winter Springs Proposed Draft 5.11.2022
Page 28 of 39
16.1 Dispute Resolution. If the parties to this Agreement are unable to resolve any
issue in which they may be in disagreement covered in this Agreement, such
dispute will be resolved in accordance with governmental conflict resolution
procedures specified in Chapter 164, F.S.
SECTION 17 EXECUTION IN COUNTERPARTS
17.1 Agreement Execution. This Agreement shall be executed in any number of
counterparts, each of which so executed shall be deemed to be original, but all
such counterparts shall, together, constitute but one in the same instrument.
SECTION 18 SUCCESSION OF AGREEMENT
18.1 Succession of Agreement. This Agreement supersedes any previous agreement
regarding public school facilities planning in which the City and School Board are
parties upon the effective date of this Agreement.
SECTION 19 EFFECTIVE DATE
19.1 Effective Date. This Agreement becomes effective upon full execution of the last
party.
1800
Winter Springs Proposed Draft 5.11.2022
Page 29 of 39
ATTEST: CITY OF ALTAMONTE SPRINGS
____________________________ By:_________________________
, City Clerk , Mayor
Date: _______________________
2021 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND
SCHOOL CONCURRENCY
Seminole County, Florida
1801
Winter Springs Proposed Draft 5.11.2022
Page 30 of 39
ATTEST: CITY OF CASSELBERRY
____________________________ By:_________________________
,City Clerk , Mayor
Date: _______________________
2021 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND
SCHOOL CONCURRENCY
Seminole County, Florida
1802
Winter Springs Proposed Draft 5.11.2022
Page 31 of 39
ATTEST: CITY OF LAKE MARY
____________________________ By:_________________________
, City Clerk , Mayor
Date: _______________________
2021 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND
SCHOOL CONCURRENCY
Seminole County, Florida
1803
Winter Springs Proposed Draft 5.11.2022
Page 32 of 39
ATTEST: CITY OF LONGWOOD
____________________________ By:_________________________
, City Clerk , Mayor
Date: _______________________
2021 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND
SCHOOL CONCURRENCY
Seminole County, Florida
1804
Winter Springs Proposed Draft 5.11.2022
Page 33 of 39
ATTEST: CITY OF OVIEDO
____________________________ By:_________________________
, City Clerk , Mayor
Date: _______________________
2021 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND
SCHOOL CONCURRENCY
Seminole County, Florida
1805
Winter Springs Proposed Draft 5.11.2022
Page 34 of 39
ATTEST: CITY OF SANFORD
____________________________ By:_________________________
, City Clerk , Mayor
Date: _______________________
2021 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND
SCHOOL CONCURRENCY
Seminole County, Florida
1806
Winter Springs Proposed Draft 5.11.2022
Page 35 of 39
ATTEST: CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
____________________________ By:_________________________
, City Clerk , Mayor
Date: _______________________
2021 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND
SCHOOL CONCURRENCY
Seminole County, Florida
1807
Winter Springs Proposed Draft 5.11.2022
Page 36 of 39
ATTEST: SCHOOL BOARD OF SEMINOLE
COUNTY, FLORIDA
____________________________ By:_________________________
Serita Beamon, Superintendent , Chairman
Date: _______________________
2021 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND
SCHOOL CONCURRENCY
Seminole County, Florida
1808
Winter Springs Proposed Draft 5.11.2022
Page 37 of 39
ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA
____________________________ By:_________________________
, Chairman
Clerk to the Board of County
Commissioners of Seminole Date: _______________________
County, Florida
2021 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND
SCHOOL CONCURRENCY
Seminole County, Florida
1809
Winter Springs Proposed Draft 5.11.2022
Page 38 of 39
APPENDIX A
CONCURRENCY SERVICE AREAS (CSAs)
WINTER SPRINGS CSA - ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
E-0 Goldsboro Elementary (Districtwide Magnet)
E-1 Geneva & Walker Elementary
E-2 Lawton & Stenstrom Elementary
E-3 Carillon & Partin Elementary
E-4 Evans & Rainbow Elementary
E-5 East Brook & Red Bug Elementary
E-6 Casselberry & Sterling Park Elementary
Winter Springs E-17 Keeth & Layer Elementary
E-8 English Estates & Lake Orienta Elementary
Winter Springs E-29 Highlands & Winter Springs Elementary
Winter Springs E-3 Rainbow and Lawton Elementary
E-10 Longwood & Woodlands Elementary
E-11 Altamonte & Spring Lake Elementary
E-12 Bear Lake & Forest City Elementary
E-13 Sabal Point & Wekiva Elementary
E-14 Heathrow & Lake Mary Elementary
E-15 Crystal Lake & Wicklow Elementary (Region 2)
E-16 Bentley, Idyllwilde, & Wilson Elementary (Region 1)
E-17 Hamilton, Midway, & Pine Crest Elementary (Region 3)
WINTER SPRINGS CSA-MIDDLE SCHOOL
M-1 Chiles Middle School
M-2 Jackson Heights Middle School
M-3 Tuskawilla Middle School
Winter Springs M-14 Indian Trails Middle School
M-5 South Seminole Middle School
M-6 Milwee Middle School
M-7 Teague Middle School
M-8 Rock Lake Middle School
M-9 Greenwood Lakes Middle School
M-10 Millennium Middle School
M-11 Sanford Middle School
M-12 Markham Woods Middle School
WINTER SPRINGS ALTERNATE CSA -MIDDLE SCHOOL
Winter Springs M-32 Tuskawilla Middle School
WINTER SPRINGS CSA - HIGH SCHOOL
H-0 Crooms Academy (Districtwide Magnet)
H-1 Hagerty High School
H-2 Oviedo High School
Winter Springs H-13 Winter Springs High School
Winter Springs H-2 Oviedo High School
H-4 Lake Howell High School
1810
Winter Springs Proposed Draft 5.11.2022
Page 39 of 39
H-5 Lyman High School
H-6 Lake Brantley High School
H-7 Lake Mary High School
H-8 Seminole High School
1811
Page 1 of 37
Deleted: Page 1 of 41¶
2021 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL
FACILITY PLANNING AND SCHOOL CONCURRENCY
Seminole County, Florida
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into with the Seminole County Board of County
Commissioners (hereinafter referred to as the "County"), the Commission or Council of
the Cities of Longwood, Altamonte Springs, Oviedo, Winter Springs, Lake Mary, Sanford,
Casselberry (hereinafter referred to as the "Cities"), and the School Board of Seminole
County (hereinafter referred to as the "School Board"), collectively referred to as the
“Parties”.
WHEREAS, the County, Cities and the School Board recognize their mutual
obligation and responsibility for the education, nurturing and general well-being of the
children within their community; and
WHEREAS, the County, Cities and the School Board are authorized to enter into
this Agreement pursuant to Section 163.01, Section 163.3177(6)(h)2 and Section
1013.33, Florida Statutes (F.S.); and
WHEREAS, the County, Cities, and School Board recognize the following benefits
to the citizens and students of their communities by more closely coordinating their
comprehensive land use and school facilities planning programs: (1) better coordination
of the timing and location of new schools with land development, (2) greater efficiency for
the school board and local governments by siting schools to take advantage of existing
and planned roads, water, sewer, and parks, (3) improved student access and safety by
coordinating the construction of new and expanded schools with the road and sidewalk
construction programs of the local governments, (4) better designed urban form by
locating and designing schools to serve as community focal points, (5) greater efficiency
and convenience by co-locating schools with parks, ball fields, libraries, and other
community facilities to take advantage of joint use opportunities, and (6) reduction of the
factors that contribute to urban sprawl and support of existing neighborhoods by
appropriately locating new schools and expanding and renovating existing schools; and
WHEREAS, the County, Cities and School Board have determined that it is
necessary and appropriate for the entities to cooperate with each other to provide
adequate public school facilities in a timely manner and at appropriate locations, to
eliminate any deficit of permanent student stations, and to provide capacity for projected
new growth; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to structure Concurrency Service Areas so
as to reduce student transportation costs, minimize student transportation times, and
maximize current and future student capacity at schools in close proximity to actual and
projected population of school age children, while still respecting opportunities for land
development in Seminole County; and
WHEREAS, Section 1013.33(4), F.S., requires that the location of public
educational facilities must be consistent with the comprehensive plan and implementing
land development regulations of the appropriate local governing body; and
Style Definition: Default Paragraph Font
Deleted: 2007
Deleted: AS AMENDED JANUARY 2008¶
Deleted: ,
1812
Page 2 of 37
Deleted: Page 2 of 41¶
WHEREAS, Sections 163.3177(6)(h)1 and 2, F.S., require each local government
to adopt an intergovernmental coordination element as part of their comprehensive plan
that states principles and guidelines to be used in the accomplishment of coordination of
the adopted comprehensive plan with the plans of the school boards, and describes the
processes for collaborative planning and decision making on population projections and
public school siting; and
WHEREAS, Sections 163.31777 and 1013.33, F.S., require the County, Cities and
School Board to establish jointly the specific ways in which the plans and processes of the
School Board and the local governments are to be coordinated; and
WHEREAS, Section 163.3180(6)(a) F.S. requires local governments that choose
to apply concurrency to public education facilities to include principles, guidelines,
standards, and strategies, including adopted levels of service, in their comprehensive
plans and interlocal agreements; and
WHEREAS the local government signatories to this Agreement have chosen to
apply concurrency to public education facilities; and
WHEREAS, the County and Cities are entering into this Agreement in reliance on
the School Board’s obligation to prepare, adopt and implement a financially feasible capital
facilities program to achieve public schools operating at the adopted level of service
consistent with the timing specified in the School Board’s Capital Facilities Plan, and the
School Board’s further commitment to update the plan annually to address projected
growth in order to maintain the adopted level of service and to demonstrate that the
utilization of school capacity is maximized to the greatest extent possible pursuant to
Section 163.3180(6)(f)2, F.S.; and
WHEREAS, the School Board, is entering into this Agreement in reliance on the
County and Cities’ obligation to adopt amendments to their local comprehensive plans to
impose optional School Concurrency as provided in Sections 163.3180(1)(a) and
163.3180(6)(a), F.S.; and
NOW THEREFORE, be it mutually agreed among the School Board, the County
and the Cities (hereinafter referred to collectively as the “Parties”) that the following
definitions and procedures will be followed in coordinating land use, public school facilities
planning, and school concurrency.
Deleted: 3177(7)
Deleted: WHEREAS, Sections 163.31777,
163.3180(13), and 1013.33, F.S., require the County,
Cities and School Board to update their Public School
Interlocal Agreement to establish school concurrency to
satisfy Section 163.3180(12)(g)1, F.S. and¶
¶
Deleted: add enough capacity to the Plan in each
succeeding fifth year to
Deleted: 13)(c
Deleted: Section
Deleted: 13
1813
Page 3 of 37
Deleted: Page 3 of 41¶
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL
FACILITY PLANNING AND SCHOOL CONCURRENCY
TBD Seminole County, Florida
Table of Contents
SECTION 1 DEFINITIONS ............................................................................................ 5
SECTION 2 COMMITTEES AND DUTIES .................................................................... 8
2.1 Planning Technical Advisory Committee (PTAC) .................................................. 8
2.2 Public Schools Facilities Planning Committee (PSFPC) ....................................... 8
SECTION 3 STUDENT ENROLLMENT AND POPULATION PROJECTIONS ............ 9
3.1 Population and Student Enrollment Projections Distributed Annually ................... 9
3.2 Student Projections ............................................................................................... 9
SECTION 4 COORDINATING AND SHARING OF INFORMATION ............................ 9
4.1 School Board Educational Facilities Work Plan .................................................... 9
4.2 Educational Plant Survey ...................................................................................... 9
SECTION 5 SCHOOL SITE SELECTION, REMODELING, AND SCHOOL CLOSURES ......... 10
5.1 New School Sites ................................................................................................ 10
5.2 School site Plan Review ...................................................................................... 10
5.3 Remodeling and Closures ................................................................................... 10
5.4 Joint Consideration of On-Site and Off-Site Improvements ................................ 11
5.5 Expansion, Renovation, or Construction ............................................................. 11
SECTION 6 LOCAL PLANNING AGENCIES (LPA), COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS,
REZONINGS, AND DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS ......................................... 11
6.1 Appointed LPA Members .................................................................................... 11
6.2 County and City Development Applications Shared with the School Board ........ 11
6.3 Criteria for Evaluating Residential Development Applications ............................ 11
6.4 Formulating City and County Plans and Programs ............................................. 12
SECTION 7 CO-LOCATION AND SHARED USE ...................................................... 12
7.1 Co-Location and Shared Use .............................................................................. 12
7.2 Mutual Use Agreement ........................................................................................ 12
SECTION 8 SPECIFIC RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARTIES ............................... 13
8.1 Specific Responsibilities of the County and Cities .............................................. 13
8.2 Specific Responsibilities of the School Board ..................................................... 13
SECTION 9 SCHOOL BOARD CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ............................ 14
9.1 School Board’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan ......................................... 14
9.2 Educational Facilities Work Plan ......................................................................... 15
9.3 Transmittal ........................................................................................................... 15
9.4 Adoption .............................................................................................................. 15
Deleted: 2007
Deleted: AS AMENDED JANUARY 2008¶
Deleted: 9
Deleted: 9
Deleted: 9
Deleted: 10
Deleted: 10
Deleted: 10
Deleted: 3.3 PTAC Review 10¶
Deleted: 10
Deleted: 10
Deleted: 10
Formatted: Don't add space between paragraphs of
the same style
Formatted: Condensed by 1 pt
Formatted: Condensed by 1 pt
Formatted: Condensed by 1 pt
Deleted: 11
Deleted: 11
Formatted: Space After: 0 pt
Formatted: Condensed by 1 pt
Deleted: 12
Deleted: 12
Deleted: 12
Deleted: 12
Deleted: 13
Deleted: 13
Deleted: 13
Deleted: 14
Deleted: 15
Deleted: 15
Deleted: 9.5 Amendments to the School
Board’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan 16¶
Page Break
2007
1814
Page 4 of 37
Deleted: Page 4 of 41¶
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL
FACILITY PLANNING AND SCHOOL CONCURRENCY
TBD
Seminole County, Florida
Table of Contents continued
SECTION 10 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ELEMENTS .................................................. 15
10.1 Required Comprehensive Plan Amendments ..................................................... 15
10.2 Development, Adoption, and Amendment of the Capital Improvements
Element (CIE) ...................................................................................................... 15
SECTION 11 SCHOOL CONCURRENCY PROGRAM ................................................ 16
11.1 Commencement of School Concurrency ............................................................. 16
11.2 Concurrency Service Areas (CSA) ...................................................................... 16
11.3 Level of Service (LOS) ........................................................................................ 17
11.4 School Concurrency Regulations ........................................................................ 17
SECTION 12 UNIFORM SCHOOL CONCURRENCY PROCESS ............................... 18
12.1 General Provisions .............................................................................................. 18
12.2 School Concurrency Application Review ............................................................. 19
12.3 Methodology ........................................................................................................ 20
12.4 Development Review Table ................................................................................ 21
12.5 Development Agreement for Mitigation ............................................................... 22
12.6 School Concurrency Approval ............................................................................. 24
12.7 Reserved Capacity .............................................................................................. 24
12.8 Appeal Process …………………………………………..……………………………25
SECTION 13 OVERSIGHT ........................................................................................... 25
13.1 Oversight ............................................................................................................. 25
SECTION 14 SPECIAL PROVISION ............................................................................ 26
14.1 School Board Requirements ............................................................................... 26
14.2 Land Use Authority .............................................................................................. 26
SECTION 15 AMENDMENT PROCESS, NOTICE, AND TERM OF AGREEMENT .... 26
15.1 Amendment of the Agreement ............................................................................ 26
15.2 Notice Requirements ........................................................................................... 26
15.3 Repeal of the Agreement .................................................................................... 27
15.4 Termination of the Agreement ............................................................................. 27
15.5 Withdrawal ........................................................................................................... 27
SECTION 16 RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES ................................................................ 27
16.1 Dispute Resolution .............................................................................................. 27
SECTION 17 EXECUTION IN COUNTERPARTS ........................................................ 27
17.1 Agreement Execution .......................................................................................... 27
SECTION 18 SUCCESSION OF AGREEMENT ........................................................... 27
18.1 Succession of Agreement ................................................................................... 27
SECTION 19 EFFECTIVE DATE .................................................................................. 27
19.1 Effective Date ………………………………………………………………………….27
APPENDIX “A” Concurrency Service Areas (CSA)………………………………37
Deleted: AS AMENDED JANUARY 2008¶
Deleted: 16
Deleted: 16
Deleted: 17
Deleted: 10.3 Development, Adoption, and ... [1]
Deleted: 18
Deleted: 18
Deleted: 18
Deleted: 19
Deleted: 19
Deleted: 19
Deleted: 19
Deleted: 20
Deleted: 21
Deleted: 22
Deleted: Proportionate Share…evelopment Agreement ... [2]
Deleted: 25
Deleted: 25
Formatted ... [3]
Deleted: 26
Deleted: 26
Deleted: 26
Deleted: 27
Deleted: 27
Deleted: 27
Deleted: 27
Deleted: 28
Deleted: 28
Deleted: 28
Deleted: 28
Deleted: 28
Deleted: 28
Deleted: 28
Deleted: 28
Deleted: 28
Deleted: 28
Deleted: 28
Deleted: ¶... [4]
Formatted ... [5]
Deleted: Area Maps
Formatted ... [6]
Deleted: )
1815
Page 5 of 37
Deleted: Page 5 of 41¶
SECTION 1 DEFINITIONS
Adjacent Concurrency Service Area: A concurrency service area which is contiguous
and touches the boundary of another concurrency service area along one side.
Attendance Zone: The geographic area in which all resident students are assigned to a
specific school or region school.
Building Permit: An approval by a local government authorizing residential construction
on a specific property.
Capital Outlay, Full Time Equivalent (COFTE) Projections: Florida Department
of Education (FDOE) COHORT student enrollment projections for Florida public
school districts, issued annually and based on information produced by the demographic,
revenue, and education estimating conferences pursuant to s. 216.136 and s. 1013.64(3)
F.S, as adjusted by the FDOE Office of Educational Facilities.
Charter School: Public schools of choice which operate under a performance contract,
or a “charter,” in accordance with Section 1002.33, F.S. Charter schools in the Seminole
County Public School District are Countywide schools of choice and do not have a
specified capacity as defined in Rule 6A-2.0010 F.A.C., State Requirements for
Educational Facilities 2014 (“SREF”) and FISH. Charter schools are not included in
concurrency or enrollment calculations.
Cities: All municipalities in Seminole County
Comprehensive Plan: A plan that meets the requirements of Sections 163.3177 F.S.
Concurrency Service Area (CSA): A geographic unit promulgated by the School Board
and adopted by local governments within which the level of service is measured when an
application for residential development is reviewed for school concurrency purposes.
Consistency: Compatible with and furthering the goals, objectives and policies of the
County and Cities Comprehensive Plan Elements and this Agreement.
Core Facilities: The media center kitchen/cafeteria, multi-purpose, toilet facilities,
administration, gymnasiums, auditoriums, and circulation space of an educational facility.
Days: All references to “days” or “day” mean calendar days unless specifically noted
otherwise.
Developer: Any person, including a governmental agency, undertaking any residential
construction.
Development Agreement for Mitigation: A developer improvement or contribution
identified in a binding and enforceable agreement between the Developer, the School
Board and the local government with jurisdiction over the approval of the development
approval to provide mitigation proportionate to the demand for public school facilities to be
created by actual development of the property, as set forth in Section 163.3180(6)(h)2 F.S
Development Approval: Site plan, final subdivision or functional equivalent, issued by a
local government granting, or granting with conditions, a Development Application.
Educational Facilities Impact Fee: A fee designated to assist in the funding for
acquisition and development of school facilities, owned and operated by the School Board,
needed to serve new growth and development.
Educational Facilities Work Plan: The School Board’s annual capital planning document
that includes long-range planning for facilities needs over 5-year and 10-year periods.
Deleted:
Deleted: identifies the public school assignment for
Deleted: .
Deleted: ),
Deleted: and SMART Schools Clearinghouse. The
projections do not include students in hospital,
homebound, summer school, evening school, etc.
since these students do not require an additional
student station.
Deleted: Cities: All municipalities in Seminole County,
except those that are exempt from the requirements of
school concurrency, pursuant to Section 163.3177(12),
F.S.¶
Deleted: and FISH.
Deleted: and 163.3178
Deleted: ,
Deleted: Educational Facility: The buildings,
equipment, structures, ancillary and special educational
use areas that are built, installed or established to
serve public educational purposes.¶
Moved (insertion) [1]
1816
Page 6 of 37
Deleted: Page 6 of 41¶
Educational Facility: The buildings, equipment, structures, ancillary, site improvements,
and special educational use areas that are built, installed or established to serve public
educational purposes.
Educational Plant Survey: A systematic study approved by the Florida Department of
Education (FDOE) of present educational and ancillary plants and the determination of
future needs to provide an appropriate educational program and services for each student
based on projected capital outlay FTE (COFTE) counts prepared and issued by the FDOE.
Fall Semester Student Count: The fall semester student count (Second Survey) of all
“full-time equivalent” students, pursuant to Chapter 1011.62, F.S.
Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan: The School Board’s annually adopted financially
feasible, five-year list of capital improvements which address student capacity to achieve
and maintain the adopted level of service.
Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH): Data, inventory and numbering system
used by the Florida Department of Education, Office of Educational Facilities for parcels
of land, buildings and rooms in public educational facilities to include permanent and
portable student stations (hereinafter referred to as "FISH).
Level of Service Standard (LOS): ): A standard or condition established by the School
District to measure utilization within a concurrency service area. Current Level of Service
is determined by the sum of the Fall Semester Student Count at the same type of schools
within a concurrency service area, divided by the sum of the Program School Capacity of
the same type of schools within a concurrency service area
Local Governments: Seminole County and its Cities.
Modular Classroom: A room designated in FISH within an educational facility which
contains student stations and where students receive instruction and which, the life
expectancy of the structure, also as designated in FISH is 35 - 49 years. Modular
classrooms generally consist of pre-manufactured concrete and/or steel type structures
owned by the School Board.
Permanent Classroom: A room designated in FISH within an educational facility which
contains student stations and where students receive instruction and which, the life
expectancy of the structure, also as designated in FISH, is 50 years or more.
Permanent Student Station: A designated space contained within a permanent building
or structure that can accommodate a student for an instructional program and is
designated satisfactory in FISH data. The total number of permanent student stations at
an educational facility is determined by the sum of individual permanent student stations
at the facility. Permanent buildings or structure types are designated by the School Board
and include permanently constructed buildings having a life expectancy of 50 years or
more and modular buildings as identified in FISH, having a life expectancy exceeding 35
– 49 years
Planning Technical Advisory Committee (PTAC): This committee is comprised of
planning staff representatives from Seminole County, each of the seven municipal
corporations within the County, and the Seminole County School Board. PTAC serves as
an advisory committee and working group to enhance intergovernmental coordination of
comprehensive plan programs and assists in ensuring consistency between these
programs and issues of multi-jurisdictional concern.
Program School Capacity: The optimal number of students that can be housed for
instruction at an educational facility as prescribed in School Board Policy po5120 – School
Deleted: Encumbered Capacity: School capacity for a
proposed project that is “set aside” or “earmarked” for a
limited amount of time while the proposed project is
undergoing review by the local government. ¶
Exempt Local Government: A municipality which is
not required to participate in school concurrency when
meeting all the requirements for having no significant
impact on school attendance, per Section
163.3177(12)(b), F.S.¶
Financial Feasibility: An assurance that sufficient
revenues are currently available or will be available
from committed funding sources for the first 3 years, or
will be available from committed or planned funding
sources for years 4 and 5, of a 5-year capital
improvement schedule for financing capital
improvements, such as ad valorem taxes, bonds, state
and federal funds, tax revenues, impact fees, and
developer contributions, which are adequate to fund
the projected costs of the capital improvements
identified in the comprehensive plan necessary to
ensure that adopted level-of-service standards are
achieved and maintained within the period covered by
the 5-year schedule of capital improvements. The
requirement that level-of-service standards be
achieved and maintained shall not apply if the
proportionate-share process set forth in Section
163.3180(12) and (16) is used [ref. 163.3164(32) F.S.].¶
Deleted: provide for
Deleted: Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) Student Count:
Fall Semester: The fall semester count of all “full-time ... [7]
Deleted:
Deleted: FTE student count
Deleted: permanent FISH capacity
Deleted: . Projected or future Level of Service is
determined by the sum of the projected
COFTE enrollments at the same type of schools within ... [8]
Deleted: Maximum School Utilization: The balance
of student enrollment system-wide, to ensure the most
efficient operation of each school within the adopted ... [9]
Deleted: a
Deleted: Permanent School Capacity: The optimal
number of students that can be housed for instruction
at an educational facility as prescribed in SBE Rule 6A-... [10]
Moved down [2]: B.
Deleted: Permanent capacity of a middle school is
90% of the sum of student stations assigned to
permanent and modular classrooms at the school.¶... [11]
Deleted: a
Deleted: or more.
Deleted: PTAC was formally created and established
by the Interlocal Planning Coordination Agreement of
1997.
1817
Page 7 of 37
Deleted: Page 7 of 41¶
Attendance Zones and Interzone Transfers in permanent, modular, and temporary type
classroom spaces designated in FISH.
A. Program School Capacity of an elementary school is 95% of the sum of student
stations assigned to permanent, modular, and temporary classrooms at the
school.
B. Program School Capacity of a middle school is 90% of the sum of student stations
assigned to permanent, modular, and temporary classrooms at the school.
C. Program School Capacity of high schools is less than the sum of student stations
assigned to permanent and modular classrooms at the school. The amount less is
prescribed in School Board Policy po5120 – School Attendance Zones and
Interzone Transfers and Rule 6A-2.0010 F.A.C., State Requirements for
Educational Facilities.
increase in the total number of housing units.
Public School Concurrency Program: A program established by Seminole County,
each of the seven municipal corporations within the County, and the Seminole County
School Board to meet the requirements of Sections 163.31777, 163.3180, and 1013.33
F.S.
Public Schools Facilities Planning Committee (PSFPC): The PSFPC is created and
established by this agreement. This committee is comprised of one elected official, or
their designee, from Seminole County, each of the seven municipal corporations within
the County, and the Seminole County School Board. The PSFPC is responsible for the
oversight of the school concurrency program established in this agreement and hears
recommendations from PTAC on school planning issues and may make recommendations
to the School Board.
Reserved Capacity: School capacity that is assigned to a proposed project once it has
received a SCALD approval for the project’s SCALD Application.
Residential Development: Any development that is comprised of dwelling units, in whole
or in part, for permanent human habitation.
School Board: The governing body established under Article IX, Section 4, of the Florida
Constitution.
School Capacity Availability Letter of Determination (SCALD): A letter prepared by
the School Board of Seminole County, identifying if school capacity is available to serve a
residential project., and if capacity exists, advising that capacity has been reserved.
School Capacity: See Program School Capacity
School District: The School District of Seminole County is created pursuant to Article IX,
Section 4, of the Florida Constitution.
School Impact Analysis (SCALD Application): A formal description of a residential
project subject to school concurrency review provided by the developer for School Board
review in accordance with Section 12 of this Agreement.
School Year: Means the period from July 1 to June 30.
Moved (insertion) [2]
Deleted: Proportionate Share Mitigation: A
developer improvement or contribution identified in a
binding and enforceable agreement between the
Developer, the School Board and the local government
with jurisdiction over the approval of the development
approval to provide compensation for the additional
demand on educational facilities created through the
residential development of the property, as set forth in
Section 163.3180(13)(e), F.S.¶
Proposed New Residential Development: Any
application
Deleted: new residential development or any
amendment to a previously approved residential
development, which results in an
Deleted: Public Facilities: Civic capital assets
including, but not limited to, transit, sanitary sewer,
solid waste, potable water, public schools, parks,
libraries and community buildings.¶
Deleted: ,
Deleted: Relocatable Classroom: A structure with a
life expectancy less than 35 years, mobile trailer
structures, or transportable wood frame structures.
Deleted: Development
Deleted: Development
Deleted: School Capacity: See permanent school
capacity¶
Deleted: ,
Deleted: recommending whether the proposed
development should be approved or
Deleted: vested.
Deleted: SIA
Deleted: .1
1818
Page 8 of 37
Deleted: Page 8 of 41¶
Student Station: A satisfactory space contained within a building or structure as
designated in FISH that can accommodate a student for an instructional program.
Temporary Classroom: Also referred to as a relocatable or portable classroom. A room
designated in FISH within an educational facility which contains student stations and
where students receive instruction and which, the life expectancy of the structure, also as
designated in FISH, is less than 35 years. Temporary classrooms generally consist of
mobile trailer structures or transportable wood frame type structures. Student stations in
temporary classrooms shall not be considered for the purposes of determining
concurrency or included in any capacity determination of any CSA.
Type of School: An educational facility providing the same grade level of education,
i.e.: elementary (grades PK-5), middle (grades 6-8), or high school (grades 9-12) or
special purpose school such as magnet school.
Utilization: The comparison of the total number of students enrolled to the total number
of Program School Capacity as determined by School Board Policy po5120 – School
Attendance Zones and Interzone Transfers.
SECTION 2 COMMITTEES AND DUTIES
2.1 Planning Technical Advisory Committee (PTAC). PTAC will meet, at a
minimum on a semi-annual basis, in the first and third quarter of the school year,
to discuss issues and formulate recommendations to the PSFPC regarding
coordination of land use and school facilities planning, including such issues as
population and student projections, development trends, school needs, co-location
and joint use opportunities, ancillary infrastructure improvements needed to
support the schools, School Board Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan and the
Public School Concurrency Program. A designee of the School Board shall be
responsible for coordinating and convening the semi-annual meeting.
2.2 Public Schools Facilities Planning Committee (PSFPC). The Parties hereby
establish a Public Schools Facilities Planning Committee for the purpose of
reviewing recommendations from PTAC on land use and school facilities planning,
including such issues as population and student projections, development trends,
school needs, co-location and joint use opportunities, ancillary infrastructure
improvements needed to support the school, potential sites for new schools, and
proposals for significant renovation and potential closure of existing schools.
Based on the review of PTAC’s recommendations, the PSFPC will submit
recommendations to the School Board. Additionally, the PSFPC will be a standing
committee to review the School Board Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan in
accordance with Sections 4.1 and 10 of this Agreement, and serve as the required
oversight committee for the Public School Concurrency Program as detailed in
Section 13 of this Agreement.
The PSFPC will meet annually to hear reports, discuss policy, set direction, and
reach understandings concerning issues of mutual concern regarding coordination
of land use and school facilities planning, including population and student growth,
development trends, school needs, off-site improvements, joint use opportunities,
and school concurrency.
SECTION 3 STUDENT ENROLLMENT AND POPULATION PROJECTIONS
Deleted: /relocatable
Moved up [1]: Educational Facilities Work Plan:
The School Board’s annual capital planning document
that includes long-range planning for facilities needs
over 5-year and 10-year periods.¶
Deleted: Tiered Level of Service: A level of service
which is graduated over time, used to achieve an
adequate and desirable level of service at the end of a
specified period of time, as permitted by the Florida
Statutes.¶
Deleted: permanent student stations
Deleted: FISH at a school facility
Deleted: July and January
Deleted: Representatives from the Regional
Planning Council will also be invited to attend.
Deleted: 14
Deleted: The PSFPC will meet annually in a
joint School Board workshop upon receipt of the draft
School Board Educational Facilities Work Plan (Work
Plan) from the School Board to discuss the Work
Plan, submitted to the Department of Education. A
representative of the Regional Planning Council will
also be invited to attend. The joint workshop will
provide the opportunity for the County, the Cities,
and the School Board
1819
Page 9 of 37
Deleted: Page 9 of 41¶
3.1 Population and Student Enrollment Projections Distributed Annually.
In fulfillment of their respective planning duties, the County, Cities, and School
Board agree to coordinate and base their plans upon consistent projections of the
amount, type, and distribution of population growth and student enrollment. At the
annual first quarter PTAC meeting described at Subsection 2.1, the County and
Cities shall provide updated five-year population projections and the School Board
will supply the annually updated student enrollment projections.
3.2 Student Projections. The Parties agree to use student population projections
based on Capital Outlay Full Time Equivalent (COFTE) cohort projections issued
by FDOE in first quarter of each school year.
SECTION 4 COORDINATING AND SHARING OF INFORMATION
4.1 School Board Educational Facilities Work Plan. During the first quarter of each
school year, the School Board shall submit to the County, each City and the Public
Schools Facilities Planning Committee (PSFPC) the School Board Educational
Facilities Work Plan prior to adoption by the Board.
A. The Plan will be consistent with the requirements of Section 1013.35, F.S.,
and include projected student populations apportioned geographically, an
inventory of existing school facilities, projections of facility space needs,
information on relocatable or portable classrooms, general locations of new
schools for the 5- and 10-year time periods.
B. The Plan will also include the financially feasible School Board Capital
Improvement Plan for a 5-year period. The Cities and County shall review
the plan and provide written comments to the School Board annually -within
twenty (20) days of receipt of the 5 Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP).
4.2 Educational Plant Survey. PTAC will assist the School Board in an advisory
capacity in the preparation and update of the Educational Plant Survey.
The Educational Plant Survey shall be consistent with the requirements of Section
1013.33, F.S. Upon receipt of the Educational Plant Survey, PTAC will have twenty
(20) days to evaluate and make recommendations regarding the location and
need for new schools, significant renovation or expansion, and closures of
educational facilities, and the consistency of such plans with the local government
comprehensive plan and relevant issues listed in Subsections 5.2, 5.3, 6.1, and
8.1 of this Agreement.
SECTION 5 SCHOOL SITE SELECTION, REMODELING, AND SCHOOL
CLOSURES
5.1 New School Sites. When the need for a new school is identified in the School
Board’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan, PTAC will review a list of potential
sites in the area of need. Potential sites for new schools will be submitted to the
local government with jurisdiction for an assessment regarding consistency with
the local government Comprehensive Plan. This jurisdiction shall have 20 days
upon receipt of the request to respond with a consistency determination. If the site
is consistent with the local government comprehensive plan, and the School Board
authorizes the acquisition of the property, the School Board shall proceed through
the appropriate site plan review process. If a determination is made that a
Deleted: July
Deleted:
Deleted: per Section 1013.31(1)(b)2, F.S.
Deleted: July
Deleted: 3.3 PTAC Review. PTAC will review
quantity, type and school distribution of COFTE
student enrollment projections.¶
Deleted: By August 1st
Deleted: relocatables
Deleted: prior to September 1st.
Deleted: fifteen (15) calendar
Deleted: 7.4,
Deleted: working
1820
Page 10 of 37
Deleted: Page 10 of 41¶
proposed school site is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the local
government shall identify whether it will support necessary amendments to the
comprehensive plan to make the school site consistent. The coordination process
shall be in accordance with Chapter 1013.33 F.S.
5.2 School Site Plan Review. Once a school site has been selected and site design
has begun, the School Board shall comply with the appropriate site plan review
process set forth within the applicable land development regulations. Nothing in
this agreement exempts school sites from the site plan review process and
ensuring the site plan is consistent with both the comprehensive plan and land
development regulations. Standards and conditions shall not be imposed which
conflict with the requirements established in Chapter 1013 F.S. or the Florida
Building Code, unless otherwise agreed to by the School Board as a part of this
Agreement.
A. The School Board shall not be required to obtain or condemn public right-
of-way from private property owners for the purposes of constructing off-
site infrastructure of which it is intended that fee simple title of the acquired
right-of-way be transferred to the County or City.
B. The County and Cities shall exempt the School Board from the payment of
planning and development fees, including but not limited to plan
amendment fees, zoning and/or site plan fees, special exception fees,
right-of-way utilization fees, permit fees, subdivision fees, and vacate fees,
as may be required by the County or Cities in the development review
process. The School Board shall be responsible for the payment of fees
associated with advertising related public hearings.
C. The County and Cities shall accept the St. Johns River Water Management
District permit for an educational facility to find that storm water collection,
treatment, retention and drainage within a school site is sufficient. If off-
site impacts are present, the County or City having jurisdiction may impose
conditions on the application as provided in the jurisdiction’s land
development regulations.
5.3 Remodeling and Closures. When the need for a remodeling project that changes
the primary use of a facility, resulting in a greater than 15 percent increase or
decrease in student capacity, or the closure of a school has been identified in the
School Board Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan, PTAC shall notify the PSFPC
and make recommendations on the impacts the renovation or closure will have on
the adopted level of service for schools. If a 5% or greater reduction of capacity is
proposed for a High School, the local government(s) with jurisdiction within the
impacted CSA will be notified.
5.4 Joint Consideration of Off-Site Improvements. In conjunction with the land use
consistency determination described in Subsection 5.1 of this Agreement, the
School Board and the effected local government will jointly determine the need for
and timing of off-site improvements necessary to support each new school or the
proposed remodeling of an existing school. The School Board and the effected
local government will agree to the timing, location, and the party or parties
responsible for financing constructing, operating and maintaining the required
improvements.
Deleted: 5
Deleted: On-Site and
Deleted: on-site and
1821
Page 11 of 37
Deleted: Page 11 of 41¶
5.5 Expansion, Renovation, or Construction. When there is to be an expansion of
an existing school site, or renovation or construction on an existing site, the School
Board and the applicable local government shall follow the coordination
requirements set forth by law, including, but not limited to Section 1013, F.S.
SECTION 6 LOCAL PLANNING AGENCIES (LPA), COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AMENDMENTS, REZONINGS, AND DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS
6.1 Appointed LPA Members. Pursuant to Section 163.3174, Florida Statutes, The
County and Cities will include School Board representative on the local planning
agencies, or equivalent agencies, to attend those meetings at which the agendas
consider comprehensive plan amendments and rezonings that would, if approved,
increase residential density on the property that is the subject of the application.
The Cities and County may at their discretion grant voting status to the appointed
School Board representative.
6.2 County and City Development Applications Shared with the School Board.
The County and the Cities shall give the District Superintendent notification of land
use applications and development proposals pending before them that may affect
student enrollment, enrollment projections, or school facilities in accordance with
Section 12 of this Agreement. Such notice will be provided within 10 days with
receipt of the application. This notice requirement applies to amendments to the
comprehensive plan future land use map, rezonings, developments of regional
impact, and/or major residential or mixed-use development projects.
6.3 Criteria for Evaluating Residential Development Applications. The County
and Cities will consider the following issues, in addition to the review process for
school concurrency described in Section 12, when reviewing Comprehensive Plan
amendments and rezonings for residential development proposals:
A. School Board comments on residential development proposals.
B. The provision of school sites and facilities within neighborhoods.
C. The compatibility of land uses adjacent to existing schools and reserved
school sites.
D. The co-location of parks, recreation and neighborhood facilities with school
sites.
E. The linkage of schools, parks, libraries and other public facilities with
bikeways, trails, and sidewalks for safe access.
6.4 Formulating City and County Plans and Programs. In formulating community
development plans and programs, the County and Cities will consider the following
issues:
A. Scheduling of capital improvements that are coordinated with and meet the
capital needs identified in the School Board’s Five–Year Capital
Improvement Plan.
B. Providing incentives to the private sector to identify and implement creative
solutions to developing adequate school facilities in residential
developments.
Deleted: working
Deleted: 13
Deleted: ;
Deleted: ;
Deleted: ;
Deleted: ;
Deleted: ;
Deleted: ;
Deleted: ;
1822
Page 12 of 37
Deleted: Page 12 of 41¶
C. Targeting community development improvements in older and distressed
neighborhoods near schools; and
D. Working to address and resolve multi-jurisdictional public-school issues.
SECTION 7 CO-LOCATION AND SHARED USE
7.1 Co-Location and Shared Use. The co-location and shared use of facilities are
important to both the School Board and local governments. Pursuant to Section
163.31777(2)(g), F.S., the School Board will seek opportunities to co-locate and
share use of school facilities and civic facilities when preparing the Board’s Five–
Year Capital Improvement Plan. Likewise, co-location and shared use
opportunities will be considered by the local governments when preparing the
annual update to the Comprehensive Plan's schedule of capital improvements and
when planning and designing new, or renovating existing, community facilities.
Opportunities for co-location and shared use with public schools will be considered
for the following:
A. Libraries;
B. Parks and recreation facilities;
C. Community centers;
D. Auditoriums;
E. Learning centers;
F. Museums;
G. Performing arts centers;
H. Stadiums; and
I. Governmental facilities.
7.2 Mutual Use Agreement. For each instance of co-location and shared use, the
School Board and local government shall enter into a separate agreement which
addresses liability, operating and maintenance costs, scheduling of use, and
facility supervision or any other issues that may arise from co-location and shared
use.
SECTION 8 SPECIFIC RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARTIES
8.1 Specific Responsibilities of the County and Cities. When the Comprehensive
Plan amendments adopted in accordance with this Agreement become effective,
the County and Cities shall undertake the following activities:
A. Adopt the required school concurrency provisions into their Land
Development Regulations (LDR) consistent with the time frame established
by law, the requirements of this Agreement, and the County and Cities’
Comprehensive Plans, unless electing to be bound by the provisions
established by the County.
Deleted:
Formatted: Font: Bold
Deleted: Page Break
Deleted: The
1823
Page 13 of 37
Deleted: Page 13 of 41¶
B. Withhold the approval of any site plan, final subdivision, or functional
equivalent for new residential units not exempted under Section 12.1(c) of
this Agreement, until the School Board has reported that there is school
capacity available or a Development Agreement for Mitigation has been
reached.
C. Share information with the School Board regarding population projections,
projections of development and redevelopment for the coming year,
infrastructure required to support educational facilities, and amendments to
future land use plan elements consistent with the requirements of this
Agreement.
D. Maintain data for approved new residential development. The data shall be
provided to the School Board annually by October 15th, and include at a
minimum, the following:
1. Development name and location.
2. Total number of dwelling units by unit type as defined in the most
recently adopted public schools impact fee ordinance.
3. Impact fee tabulation as provided by the County.
4. Total number of dwelling units with certificates of occupancy (CO)
by Development by date.
E. Transmit site plans, final subdivision or functional equivalency for approved
new residential development upon request by the School Board.
8.2 Specific Responsibilities of the School Board. By entering into this Agreement,
the School Board agrees to undertake the following activities:
A. Annually prepare and update a Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan to
meet the anticipated demand for student stations identified by the COFTE.
B. Consider school attendance boundary adjustments as may be appropriate
to maximize the utilization of capacity in order to ensure that all schools of
each type (elementary, middle, high) in each Concurrency Service Area
and each individual school operate at the adopted level of service,
consistent with the requirements of this Agreement and School Board
Policy po5120 – School Attendance Zones and Interzone Transfers.
Initiation of attendance boundaries shall be at the sole discretion of the
School Board.
C. Plan capacity enhancing and remodeling projects necessary to maintain
the adopted level of service consistent with the Five-Year CIP.
D. Provide the County and Cities with the required data and analysis updated
annually to support the comprehensive plan elements and any
amendments relating to school concurrency.
E. Adopt a five- and ten-year CIP consistent with the requirements of this
Agreement.
F. Review proposed new residential developments for compliance with
concurrency standards, consistent with the requirements of this
Agreement.
Deleted: mitigation agreement
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 1.5"
Deleted: calculation
Deleted: financially feasible
Deleted: projections so that no Concurrency
Service Area exceeds the adopted level of service
Deleted: 5.30.
Deleted: Construct
1824
Page 14 of 37
Deleted: Page 14 of 41¶
G. Consider and approve Development Agreement for Mitigation options for
new residential development as appropriate.
H. Prepare annual reports on enrollment and capacity, consistent with the
requirements of this Agreement.
I. Provide necessary staff and material support for meetings of the PSFPC
as required by this Agreement.
J. Provide information to the County and Cities regarding enrollment
projections, school siting, infrastructure necessary to support educational
facilities, and amendments to future land use plan elements consistent with
the requirements of this Agreement.
SECTION 9 SCHOOL BOARD CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
9.1 School Board’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan. In preparation of the
School Board’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan and each annual update, the
School Board shall undertake the following:
A. Update and adopt the School Board’s Five–Year Capital Improvement Plan
for public schools in Seminole County on or before September 30th of each
year.
B. Specify all new construction, remodeling or renovation projects which will
add permanent capacity or modernize existing facilities.
C. Prepare the School Board’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan and each
annual update to provide a financially feasible program of school
construction for a five (5) year period.
1. Include school construction projects which, when completed, will
add sufficient capacity to achieve and maintain the adopted LOS
standard for all schools based on the projected COFTE enrollment;
provide for required modernizations; and satisfy the School Board’s
constitutional obligation to provide a uniform system of free public
schools on a county-wide basis.
2. Include a description of each school project, in the School Board’s
Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan.
D. Maximize utilization of existing schools so that proposed projects add the
necessary capacity to maintain the adopted Level of Service standard.
E. The School Board’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan and each annual
update shall consider the projected enrollment, capacity and utilization
percentage of all schools.
9.2 Educational Facilities Work Plan. In addition to the adopted School Board’s Five-
Year Capital Improvement Plan, the School Board shall annually adopt a five-year
and ten-year work plan based upon revenue projections, COFTE enrollment
projections and facility needs for the five-year and ten-year period. It is recognized
that the projections in the five- and ten-year time frames are tentative and should
be used only for general planning purposes. Upon completion, the Educational
Facilities Work Plan will be transmitted to the local governments.
Deleted: proportionate share mitigation
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 1.5"
Deleted: D
Deleted: permanent
Deleted: E.
Deleted: F
Deleted: permanent
Deleted: G
Deleted: identify
1825
Page 15 of 37
Deleted: Page 15 of 41¶
9.3 Transmittal. The School Board shall transmit to the County, the local governments
and the PSFPC copies of the proposed Educational Facilities Work Plan and the
Five-Year CIP for review and comment. Transmittal to the PSFPC, the Cities and
the County shall occur during first quarter of each school year commencing after
the effective date of this Agreement.
9.4 Adoption. Unless the adoption is delayed by mediation, delayed receipt of data
from FDOE, or a lawful challenge, the School Board shall adopt their Five-Year
Capital Improvement Plan no later than September 30th, and it shall become
effective no later than October 1st of each year.
SECTION 10 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ELEMENTS
10.1 Required Comprehensive Plan Amendments. The County and the Cities agree
to adopt the following Comprehensive Plan amendments no later than ten (10)
calendar months following the effective date of this Agreement.
A. An amended Capital Improvement Element (CIE) that includes the portion
of the adopted School Board’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan dealing
with capacity improvements. The amended information will be adopted by
the local jurisdictions no later than December 31st following the annual
adoption of the Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan by the School Board.
This will ensure that the CIE uniformly sets forth a financially feasible public
school capital facilities program, consistent with the adopted Level of
Service standards for public schools.
B. A Public School Facilities Element (PSFE) consistent with the requirements
of Section 163.3180(6) F.S. and this Agreement.
C. An amended Intergovernmental Coordination Element as required by
Section 163.3177(6)(h)1 and 2 F.S. and this Agreement.
D. Each jurisdiction’s amendments shall be consistent with this Agreement,
and those adopted by the other jurisdictions as required by Section
163.3180, F.S.
10.2 Development, Adoption, and Amendment of the Capital Improvements
Element (CIE). An annual update or any amendment to the School Board’s
Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan by the School Board, once adopted by the
School Board, shall be transmitted to the County and the Cities. The County and
the Cities shall adopt the capacity portions of the School Board’s Five-Year Capital
Improvement Plan into the Capital Improvement Element of their Comprehensive
Plans.
A. The County and the Cities, by adopting the capacity portions of “The
Seminole County Public School’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan” in
the Capital Improvements Element of the Local Government’s
Comprehensive Plan, shall have neither the obligation nor the
responsibility for funding or accomplishing the School Board Five-Year
Capital Improvement Plan.
SECTION 11 SCHOOL CONCURRENCY PROGRAM
Deleted: on or before August 1st
Deleted: 9.5 Amendments to the School
Board’s Five-Year Capital Improvement
Plan. The School Board shall not amend the School
Board’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan so as to
modify, delay or delete any project in the first three
(3) years of the Plan unless the School Board, with
the concurrence of a majority vote by its Board
members, provides written confirmation that:¶
A.The modification, delay or deletion of a project
is required in order to meet the School Board’s
constitutional obligation to provide a county-wide
uniform system of free public schools or other legal
obligations imposed by state or federal law; or ¶
B.The modification, delay or deletion of a project
is occasioned by unanticipated change in enrollment
projections or growth patterns or is required in order
to provide needed capacity in a location that has a
current greater need than the originally planned
location and does not cause the adopted LOS to be
exceeded in the Concurrency Service Area from
which the originally planned project is modified,
delayed or deleted; or¶
C.The project schedule or scope has been
modified to address local government concerns, and
the modification does not cause the adopted LOS to
be exceeded in the Concurrency Service Area from
which the originally planned project is modified,
delayed or deleted; and¶
Moved down [3]: D.
Formatted: Font: Not Bold
Formatted: Font: Bold
Deleted: The PSFPC, as the required oversight
committee for school concurrency as detailed in
Section 14 of this Agreement, has had the
opportunity to review the proposed amendment and
has submitted its recommendation to the
Superintendent or designee.¶
E.The School Board may amend at anytime its
Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan to add
necessary capacity projects to satisfy the provisions
of this Agreement. For additions to the Five-Year
Capital Improvement Plan, the School Board must ... [12]
Deleted: January 1, 2008
Deleted: shall
Deleted: included in the next comprehensive plan
amendment, but
Deleted: 1st,
Deleted: Sections 163.3177(12) and
Deleted: 10.3 Development, Adoption, and
Amendment of the Public School Facilities
Element (PSFE). The County and the Cities shall
adopt a Public School Facilities Element which is ... [13]
1826
Page 16 of 37
Deleted: Page 16 of 41¶
11.1 Commencement of School Concurrency. The School Concurrency Program
described in this Agreement shall commence on the EFFECTIVE DATE.
11.2 Concurrency Service Areas (CSA). The Parties hereby agree that School
Concurrency shall be measured and applied using a geographic area known as a
Concurrency Service Area (CSA) which coincides with groupings of school
attendance zones within each school type based on adjacency, as established in
this Agreement. The designation of the specific school attendance zones
comprising each of the CSAs are provided in Appendix “A” of this Agreement.
A. CSA service area boundaries, together with the standards for establishing
those boundaries, will be identified in the Comprehensive Plans of each
City and the County pursuant to Section 163.3180(6)(f)2.a., F.S. The
designation of the specific school attendance zones comprising each of
the CSAs will be included as support documents used as a basis for or in
developing the local comprehensive plan . The comprehensive plan will
include a statement advising that in order to determine the geographic
boundary of each CSA, current School Board attendance zone maps for
each school included within each CSA must be consulted.
B. The following standards shall apply to the composition of CSAs:
1. In Order to maximize school capacity, each elementary CSA must
include a minimum of two elementary schools: and
2. When a new elementary school opens it may be placed in the CSA that
includes the most proximate existing elementary school with consideration
of the goals established in School Board Policy po5120 to include, but not
be limited to, minimizing the duration of travel time and distance while not
placing a transportation burden on any identifiable diversity sub group
(social economic, race/ethnicity, ESOL, or disability): and
3. The capacity at county-wide Magnet Schools shall not be attributed to
the available capacity for the CSA in which the county wide Magnet School
is located.
C. As future school attendance zone changes are required for schools
programmed in the Seminole School Board Five-Year Capital Improvement
Plan, the CSAs shall automatically be modified to the greatest extent
possible so as to provide maximum utilization.
D. Any Party may propose a change to the CSA boundaries or the designation
of which individual school attendance zones comprise the CSAs. Prior to
adopting any change to a CSA, the School Board must verify that as a
result of the change:
1. The adopted level of service standards will be achieved and
maintained for each year of the five-year planning period; and
2. The utilization of Program School Capacity will be maximized to the
greatest extent possible, taking into account transportation costs,
and other relevant factors.
E. The Parties shall observe the following process for modifying CSA School
Designations:
Deleted: January 1, 2009 2008
Formatted: Left
Deleted: mapping
Deleted: CSAs shall be included in the data and
analysis…
Deleted: Public School Facilities Element and
Deleted: CSAs will be described geographically
Deleted: Plan
Deleted: (13)(g)(5),
Deleted: Maps
Deleted: CSA boundaries
Deleted: defined
Deleted: Rule 9J-5.003, FAC and may be updated
from time …
Deleted: time by the
Formatted: Highlight
Deleted: County and Cities
Deleted: adopt
Deleted: standards for modification
Deleted: Concurrency Service Area maps as
defined here into…
Deleted: PSFE
Deleted: Comprehensive Plan based upon
Deleted: 5.30, titled “Student Assignment”.
Deleted: .
Deleted: school capacity
Deleted: maps
1827
Page 17 of 37
Deleted: Page 17 of 41¶
1. Changes in school attendance zone boundaries shall be governed
by School Board Policy po5120 – School Attendance Zones and
Interzone Transfers, Section 120.54 F.S. and applicable uniform
rules governing rulemaking and administrative proceedings. Prior
to the School Board holding an initial public meeting to consider
whether to begin the School Attendance Zone revision process, the
School Board will notify the Local Government(s) with jurisdiction
within the impacted CSA of the proposed revision.
2. At such time as the School Board determines that modification to a
school(s) attendance zone boundary is appropriate, the School
Board shall make public the revised attendance zone boundary and
shall provide notice of the proposed changes to the Cities, to the
County, and to the PSFPC.
3. Not Used.
4. Concurrency Service Area geographic boundaries shall conform to
revised school attendance zone boundaries and shall become
effective upon final adoption of the modified school attendance
zone boundaries by the School Board pursuant to School Board
Policy po5120 – School Attendance Zones and Interzone
Transfers, but shall not require amendment to this Agreement or to
the local government jurisdiction’s comprehensive plan.
5. To become effective, any proposed change to CSA boundaries that:
a. is not a CSA boundary change resulting from a School
Board modification to school attendance zone geographic
boundaries pursuant to School Board Policy po5120 –
School Attendance Zones and Interzone Transfers; or
b. is a proposed change to the designation of which individual
school attendance zones comprise the various CSAs,
must be reviewed by the PTAC, the PSFPC, and approved by all
Parties as an amendment to this Agreement.
11.3 Level of Service (LOS) Standard. To ensure the capacity of schools is sufficient
to support student growth, the County, Cities and School Board shall adopt a LOS
standard for schools. The Parties hereby agree that the maximum LOS standard
shall be the Program School Capacity for each school type within each CSA.
11.4 School Concurrency Regulations. Each Local Government shall adopt school
concurrency provisions into its land development regulations (LDRs) consistent
with the requirements of this Agreement.
A. The County and the Cities shall amend their LDRs to adopt school
concurrency provisions for the review of development approvals.
1. In the event that any participating City does not adopt LDRs within
18 months, that government shall be deemed to have “opted in” to
the County regulations and agrees to be bound by the terms and
provisions therein until it adopts its own ordinance.
Deleted: 5.30
Deleted: 102
Deleted: for
Moved (insertion) [4]
Moved up [4]: 2.
Deleted: considering the above standards
Deleted: transmit
Deleted: zones or CSAs
Deleted: data and analysis to support
Deleted: 3.The County, Cities and PSFPC
shall review the proposed amendment within the
times prescribed by Section 120.54 F.S.¶
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0", Tab stops: 1.5", Left
Deleted: The change to a
Deleted: boundary
Deleted: .¶
F.Charter schools
Deleted: magnet schools will
Deleted: have their own CSA. Charter and
magnet schools are open to all students residing
within the district and students are generally
accepted through application approval. These
special public schools vary in size, and may
target a specific type of student and can limit the
age groups or grade levels
Formatted: Highlight
Formatted: Indent: Left: -0.5", Tab stops: Not at 1.5"
Deleted: desired
Deleted: 100% of
Deleted: aggregate permanent FISH capacity
Deleted:
Deleted: To financially achieve the desired
LOS standard at the high school level, a tiered LOS
standard is established as follows:¶... [14]
Deleted: Within 18 months of the effective date of
this Agreement, each
1828
Page 18 of 37
Deleted: Page 18 of 41¶
2. At any time, any Local Government may opt out of the County’s
implementing ordinance through implementing its own ordinance.
SECTION 12 UNIFORM SCHOOL CONCURRENCY PROCESS
12.1 General Provisions. The County, the Cities and the School Board shall ensure
that the Level of Service Standard established for each school type is maintained.
A. No site plan, final subdivision, or functional equivalent for new residential
development may be approved by the County or Cities, unless the
residential development is exempt from these requirements as provided in
Section 12.1(c) of this Agreement, or until a School Capacity Availability
Letter Determination (SCALD) has been issued by the School Board to the
local government indicating that adequate school facilities exist.
B. A local government may condition the approval of the residential
development to ensure that necessary school facilities are in place. This
shall not limit the authority of a local government to deny a site plan, final
subdivision or its functional equivalent, pursuant to its home rule regulatory
powers.
C. The following residential uses shall be considered exempt from the
requirements of school concurrency:
1. Any amendment to any previously approved residential
development, which does not increase the number of dwelling units
or change the type of dwelling units (single-family, multi-family,
etc.).
2. Any community subject to a restrictive covenant on all residential
units that results in no permanent residents under the age of
eighteen (18)..
3. De minimus impact residential single-family developments with four
(4) or less units, or multi-family developments with eight (8) or less
units. Such de minimus impact exempt developments would still be
required to go through other approval processes required by the
local government(s).
D. Any new residential development that received a passing School Capacity
Availability Letter of Determination (“SCALD”) prior to the effective date of
this Agreement will remain under the terms and conditions established in
the Agreement when the SCALD was received and will not be required to
apply for a new SCALD under this Agreement or be subject to the time
deadlines and forfeiture provisions set forth in Section 12.7 below.
E. Upon request by a developer submitting a land development application
with a residential component, the School Board shall issue a determination
as to whether or not a development, lot or unit is exempt from the
requirements of school concurrency and submit a copy of the determination
to the local government within 10 days.
Deleted: ¶
Deleted: 1.All residential lots of record at
the time the School Concurrency implementing
ordinance becomes effective.¶
2.Any new residential development that has
a site plan approval, final subdivision or the
functional equivalent for a site specific
development approval prior to the
commencement date of the School Concurrency
Program.¶
3
Deleted: 4
Deleted: age restricted
Deleted: with no permanent residents under the
age of eighteen (18). An age restricted
community shall be …
Deleted:
Deleted: limiting
Moved (insertion) [3]
Formatted: Font: Not Bold
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 1"
Formatted: Font: Bold
Deleted: age
Deleted: permanent residents to 18 years
Deleted: older.
Formatted: Font: Bold
Deleted: D
1829
Page 19 of 37
Deleted: Page 19 of 41¶
12.2 School Concurrency Application Review
A. A developer may request a preliminary school capacity assessment from
the School Board, which will provide the developer with the school capacity
available at the time of the preliminary assessment, but will not reserve
capacity and will not bind the School Board in subsequent capacity
determinations.
B. Any developer submitting a development permit application (such as site
plan or final subdivision) with a residential component that is not exempt
under Section 12.1(C) or 12.1(D) of this Agreement is subject to school
concurrency and shall prepare and submit a SCALD Application to the
School Board for review. The SCALD Application form shall be obtained
from the School Board.
C. The SCALD Application shall indicate the location of the development, the
number of dwelling units by unit type (single-family detached, single family
attached (townhomes/condominiums), multi-family with unit sizes, and
mobile homes), a phasing schedule (if applicable), and age restrictions for
occupancy (if any). The School Board concurrency test shall follow the
following steps:
1. Test Submittal. The developer shall submit a SCALD Application
to the School Board with a copy to the local government with
jurisdiction over the proposed development. The completed
SCALD Application must be submitted a minimum of five days but
not more than 30 days prior to Development Application submittal
to the local government. The School Board shall perform a
sufficiency review on the SCALD Application. An incomplete
SCALD Application will be returned to the Owner/Developer without
processing. The School Board will have 20 days to determine
sufficiency and complete the Test Review. The School Board may
charge the applicant a non-refundable application fee payable to
the School Board to meet the cost of review in accordance with
Florida Statutes.
2. Test Review. Each SCALD Application will be reviewed in the order
in which it is received by the School Board.
3. Passing the Test. If the available capacity of public schools for
each type within the CSA [or contiguous CSAs as provided for in
12.2(C) below] containing the proposed project is equal to or
greater than the proposed project’s needed capacity, the
concurrency test is passed. The School Board will issue a SCALD
identifying the school capacity available to serve the proposed
project, indicating that said capacity has been reserved for the
proposed project, and containing a warning that reserved capacity
will be forfeited if the developer fails to meet the time deadlines set
forth in Section 12.7, below..
Formatted: Font: Not Bold
Deleted: c
Deleted: School Impact Analysis (SIA)
Deleted: B
Deleted: SIA
Deleted: ,
Deleted: , apartments
Deleted: SIA
Deleted: SIA
Deleted: working
Deleted: SIA application.
Deleted: SIA application
Deleted: working
Deleted: SIA application
Deleted: School Capacity Availability Letter of
Determination (…
Deleted: )
Deleted: and
Deleted: encumbered
Deleted: for
Deleted: period of one year. A
Deleted: encumbrance fee
Deleted: established during
Deleted: regulatory phase of this process.
1830
Page 20 of 37
Deleted: Page 20 of 41¶
4, Forfeiture of reserved capacity. If developer fails to meet the time
deadlines set forth in Section 12.7 below, the reserved capacity will
be forfeited and the developer must resubmit a new SCALD
Application.
5. Failing the Test. If the available capacity of public schools for
any type within the CSA (or contiguous CSAs as provided for
in Section 12.3(c) below) containing the proposed project is less
than the proposed project’s needed capacity, the concurrency test
is failed. The School Board will issue a SCALD informing the
developer that capacity is not available and advising the developer
of the following options:
a. Accept a 30 day temporary reservation of available school
capacity, and within the same 30-day period, amend the
Development Application to balance it with the available
capacity. The time deadlines set forth in Section 12.7 will be
tolled until the Development Application has been amended
or the temporary reservation of capacity has expired,
whichever is earlier; or
b. Accept a 60 day temporary reservation of available school
capacity, and within the same 60 day period, negotiate and
agree with the School Board and the local government on a
Development Agreement for Mitigation plan as outlined in
Section 12.5 below. The time deadlines set forth in Section
12.7 will be tolled until an agreed Development Agreement
has been finalized or rejected by the local government board
or commission, or the 60 day temporary reservation of
capacity has expired without agreement, whichever is
earlier; or
c. Appeal the results of the failed test pursuant to the
provisions in Section 12.8 below; or
d. Withdraw the SCALD Application.
6. Test Abandonment. If no option under Section 12.2(B)(5) above is
selected by the developer within 15 days following issuance of the
SCALD, then the SCALD Application shall be deemed abandoned.
12.3 Methodology. The methodology for performing the concurrency test shall follow
the steps outlined below:
A. To determine a proposed development’s projected students, the proposed
development’s projected number and type of residential units shall be
converted into projected students for all schools of each type within the
specific CSA using the adopted Student Generation Multiplier, as
established in the most current adopted Seminole County Educational
System Impact Fee Ordinance and Seminole County Public Schools
Impact Fee Study Update.
B. New school capacity within a CSA which is in place or planned for
construction in the first three years of the School Board’s Capital
Deleted: 4
Deleted: 2
Deleted: School Capacity Availability Letter of
Determination (…
Deleted: ) and inform
Deleted: . If
Deleted: the School Board will advise
Deleted: encumbrance
Deleted:
Deleted: ;
Deleted: encumbrance
Deleted: Proportionate Share
Deleted: 6
Deleted: SIA application
Deleted: 5
Formatted: Font: Italic
Deleted: 4
Deleted: exercised
Deleted: 45
Deleted: application
Deleted: BCC Public School
Deleted: under actual
1831
Page 21 of 37
Deleted: Page 21 of 41¶
Improvement Plan will be added to the capacity shown in the CSA, and is
counted as available capacity for the residential development under review.
C. If the projected student growth from a residential development causes the
adopted LOS to be exceeded in the CSA, an adjacent CSA which is
contiguous with and touches the boundary of, the concurrency service area
within which the proposed development is located shall be evaluated for
available capacity. An adjacency evaluation review shall be conducted as
follows:
1. In conducting the adjacency review, the School Board shall first use
the adjacent CSA with the most available capacity to evaluate
projected enrollment impact and, if necessary, shall continue to the
next adjacent CSA with the next most available capacity.
2. Consistent with Rule 6A-3.0171 F.A.C., at no time shall the shift of
impact to an adjacent CSA result in a total morning or afternoon
transportation time of either elementary or secondary students to
exceed fifty (50) minutes or one (1) hour, respectively. The
transportation time shall be determined by the School Board
transportation routing system and measured from the school the
impact is to be assigned, to the center of the subject parcel/plat in
the amendment application, along the most direct improved pubic
roadway free from major hazards.
12.4 Development Review Table. The School Board shall create and maintain a
Development Review Table (DRT) for each CSA, and will use the DRT to compare
the projected students from proposed residential developments to the CSAs
available capacity programmed within the first three years of the current five-year
capital planning period.
A. Student enrollment projections shall be based on the most recently adopted
School Board Capital Facilities Work Program, and the DRT shall be
updated to reflect these projections. Available capacity shall be derived
using the following formula:
Available Capacity = School Capacity¹ – (Enrollment² + Approved³)
Where:
¹School Capacity = Program School Capacity as programmed in the first
three (3) years of the School Board’s Five-Year CIP
²Enrollment = Student enrollment as counted at the Fall Semester
Student Count.
³Approved = Students generated from approved residential developments
after the implementation of school concurrency
B. Using the Fall Semester Student Count, the vested number of students on
the DRT will be reduced by the number of students represented by the
residential units that received certificates of occupancy within the previous
twelve (12) month period.
12.5 Development Agreement for Mitigation. In the event there is not available
school capacity to support a development, the School Board will entertain
Formatted: Font: Not Bold
Deleted: Permanent
Deleted:
Formatted: Tab stops: Not at 0.5"
Deleted: FTE
Deleted: FTE
Deleted: Proportionate Share
Deleted: may
1832
Page 22 of 37
Deleted: Page 22 of 41¶
Development Agreement for Mitigation options consistent with Section
163.3180(6)(h), F.S., and, if accepted, shall enter into an enforceable and binding
agreement with the developer to mitigate the impact from the development through
the creation of additional school capacity.
A. When the anticipated student impacts from a proposed development cause
the adopted LOS to be exceeded, the developer’s mitigation agreement will
be based on the number of additional student stations necessary to achieve
the established LOS. The amount to be paid will be calculated by the cost
per student station for elementary, middle and high school as determined
and published by the State of Florida.
B. The methodology used to calculate a Development Agreement for
Mitigation credits shall be as follows:
Development Mitigation Share = (¹Development students - Available
Capacity) x 2Total Cost per student station
Where:
¹Development students = those students from the development that are
assigned to a CSA and have triggered a deficiency of the available
capacity.
2Total Cost = the cost per student station as determined and published by
Seminole County Public Schools School Impact Fee Study Update in effect
as of the date of issuance of the SCALD.
C. The applicant shall accept a 60 day encumbrance of available school
capacity, and within the same 60 day period enter into negotiations with the
Local Government(s) with jurisdiction in the effected CSA and the School
Board in an effort to mitigate the impact from the development through the
creation of additional capacity. Upon identification and acceptance of a
mitigation option deemed financially feasible by the Local Government(s)
with jurisdiction in the effected CSA and the School Board, the developer
shall enter into a binding and enforceable development agreement with the
Local Government(s) with jurisdiction in the effected CSA and the School
Board.
1. A mitigation contribution provided by a developer to offset the
impact of a residential development must be directed by the School
Board toward a school capacity project identified in the School
Board’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan.
2. If capacity projects are planned in years four (4) or five (5) of the
School Board’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan within
the same CSA as the proposed residential development, the
developer may pay his proportionate share to mitigate the proposed
development in accordance with the formula provided in Section
12.5 (B) of this Agreement.
3. If a capacity project does not exist in the Capital Improvement Plan,
the School Board will add a capacity project to satisfy the impacts
from a proposed residential development, if it is funded through the
developer’s proportionate share mitigation contributions. Mitigation
options may include, but are not limited to:
Deleted: proportionate share mitigation
Deleted: proportionate share
Deleted: developer’s proportionate share
mitigation…
Deleted: Proportionate
Deleted: the State of Florida
Deleted: 90
Deleted: 90
Deleted: Capacity enhancing projects identified
within the first three (3) years of the Five-Year
Capital Improvement Plan shall be considered
as committed in accordance with Section 9.5 of
this Agreement.
1833
Page 23 of 37
Deleted: Page 23 of 41¶
a. Contribution of land or payment for land acquisition suitable
for and in conjunction with, the provision of additional school
capacity or through application of County education system
impact fee credits pursuant to Seminole County Ordinance
2018-1, section 105.46; or
b. Mitigation banking based on the construction of an
educational facility in exchange for the right to receive
impact fee credits; or
c. Provide modular or permanent student stations acceptable
for use as an educational facility; or
d. Provide additional student stations through the remodeling
of existing buildings acceptable for use as an educational
facility; or
e. Construction or expansion of permanent student stations at
the impacted school within the CSA; or
f. Construction of an educational facility in advance of the time
set forth in the School Board’s Five-Year Capital
Improvement Plan.
D. For mitigation measures (a) thru (f) above, the estimated cost of the
mitigating capacity will reflect the estimated future costs at the time of the
anticipated construction. Improvements contributed by the developer shall
receive school impact fee credit.
E. Developer shall receive an impact fee credit for the proportionate share
mitigation. Credits will be given for that portion of the impact fees that would
have been used to fund the improvements on which the proportionate fair
share contribution was calculated. The portion of impact fees available for
the credit will be based on the historic Seminole County Impact Fee
Ordinance’s distribution of impact fee funds to the school type (elementary,
middle, high) in the appropriate CSAs. Impact fee credits shall be
calculated at the same time as the applicant’s proportionate share
obligation is calculated. Impact fee credits may be transferred pursuant to
Section 163.31801, Florida Statutes.
F. A proportionate share mitigation contribution shall not be subsequently
amended or refunded after final site plan or plat approval to reflect a
reduction in planned or constructed residential density.
G. Impact fees shall be credited against the proportionate share mitigation
total.
H. Any proportionate share mitigation must be directed by the School Board
toward a school capacity improvement identified in the School Board’s
Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan.
I. Upon conclusion of the negotiation period, a second School Capacity
Availability Letter of Determination (SCALD) shall be issued. If mitigation is
agreed to, the School Board shall issue a new Determination Letter
approving the development subject to those mitigation measures agreed to
by the local government, developer and the School Board. Prior to, site
Deleted: a
Deleted: sell capacity
Deleted: facilities
Deleted: a
Deleted: to construct
Deleted: construction
Deleted: CSA
Deleted: Any school impact fee credit based on
proportionate fair share contributions for a
proposed development cannot be transferred to
any other parcel or parcels of real property within
the CSA…
Deleted: Letter
1834
Page 24 of 37
Deleted: Page 24 of 41¶
plan approval, final subdivision approval or the functional equivalent, the
mitigation measures shall be memorialized in an enforceable and binding
agreement with the local government, the School Board and the Developer
that specifically details mitigation provisions to be paid for by the developer
and the relevant terms and conditions. If mitigation is not agreed to, the
Determination Letter shall detail why any mitigation proposals were
rejected and why the development is not in compliance with school
concurrency requirements. A SCALD indicating either that adequate
capacity is available, or that there is not a negotiated proportionate share
mitigation settlement following the sixty (60) day negotiation period as
described in Section 12.7(B) of this Agreement, constitutes final agency
action by the School Board for purposes of Chapter 120, F.S.
12.6 School Concurrency Approval. Issuance of a SCALD by the School Board
identifying that adequate capacity exists indicates only that school facilities are
currently available, and capacity for the proposed development has been reserved.
A. A local government shall not issue a Development approval for a residential
development until receiving confirmation of available school capacity in the
form of a SCALD from the School Board. The Development approval shall
include a reference to the findings of the SCALD indicating that the project
meets school concurrency.
B. Local governments shall notify the School Board within fifteen (15) days of
any official change in the validity (status) of a Development Approval for a
residential development that has received a SCALD.
C. The Local Government shall not issue a building permit or its functional
equivalent for a non-exempt residential development until receiving
confirmation of available school capacity from the School Board in the form
of a SCALD.
12.7 Reserved Capacity. School capacity will be reserved when the School District
issues the SCALD. If the local government denies the Development Application,
then the Development’s reserved school capacity is forfeited. The Development’s
reserved school capacity will be forfeited if the development approval or building
permit is terminated or expires, or if development fails to meet any of the following
time deadlines:
A. The development application submittal is not submitted to the local
government with jurisdiction within thirty (30) days following the date of
issuance of the SCALD.
B. Vertical Construction of a portion of the Project associated with residential
units has not commenced within two (2) years following issuance of
SCALD. This deadline will be extended by School Board for one (1)
additional year if the development application is still under review by the
local government and upon the recommendation of the local government
with jurisdiction;
C. Construction of the development identified in the SCALD has not been
completed within four (4) years of the commencement of construction. This
Deleted: ninety (90
Deleted: encumbered. Capacity will not be reserved
until the local government issues Development
Approval.
Deleted: ..
Deleted: ten (10) working
Deleted: Once the local government has issued a
final development approval, school concurrency for
the residential development shall be valid for the
life of the final development approval.
Deleted: there is a final disposition of the
Development Application by the local government.
Deleted: approves
Deleted: by means of a Development Approval, or
its equivalent,
Deleted: School Board shall move the
Deleted: from encumbered status to reserved status
for the proposed project. When the local government
issues a Development approval for a residential
project it shall notify the school board within 10
working days.
Deleted: duration for which
Deleted: is reserved shall be subject to the
respective municipality’s Land
Deleted: Code, but shall not exceed two years from
the date of
Deleted: the issuance of a
Deleted: , whichever occurs first. If the building
permit once issued
Deleted: under the
Deleted: regulations
Deleted: ,
Formatted: Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style:
A, B, C, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at:
0.75" + Indent at: 1"
Deleted: project will lose its reserved capacity.
Should a Development Approval for a residential
development expire,
Deleted: subject municipality shall notify
1835
Page 25 of 37
Deleted: Page 25 of 41¶
deadline may be extended by School Board for one (1) additional year upon
the recommendation of the local government with jurisdiction.
It is the developer’s responsibility to provide written notice to the School Board that
each of the above time deadlines has been met. The School Board will provide the
developer with thirty (30) days advanced written notice prior to forfeiture of the
developer’s reserved capacity in the event the developer does not satisfy 12.7 B.
or C.
12.8 Appeal Process. A person substantially affected by a School Board’s adequate
capacity determination made as a part of the School Concurrency Process may
appeal such determination through the process provided in Chapter 120, F.S.,
Administrative Procedure Act.
SECTION 13 OVERSIGHT
13.1 Oversight. The PSFPC will serve as the required oversight committee for school
concurrency to monitor and evaluate the school concurrency program.
The committee shall meet at a minimum once annually in accordance with the laws
of Florida governing public meetings, and report to participating local governments,
the School Board and the general public on the effectiveness with which this
Agreement is being implemented. The PSFPC representative from the Seminole
County School Board shall act as the chairperson. A designee of the School Board
shall be responsible for coordinating the PSFPC meetings.
A.The monitoring and evaluation of the school concurrency process is
required pursuant to Section 163.3180(6)(i)4c, F.S., and Section 2 of this
Agreement. The PSFPC shall be responsible for evaluating this Agreement
and the effectiveness of the School Concurrency System. Commencing in
2025, upon completion of each periodic Seminole County Impact Fee Study
Update pursuant to the Land Development Code of Seminole County,
Chapter 105, “Education System Impact Fees”, the PSFPC shall evaluate
the effectiveness of the CSAs for measuring LOS and consider making
recommendations to amend this Agreement. The failure of the PSFPC to
initiate this review in a timely manner shall not affect the validity of this
Agreement.
B.The PSFPC members shall receive copies of all reports and documents
produced pursuant to this Agreement.
C.During the first quarter of each school year, the PSFPC shall receive the
proposed School Board’s District Educational Facilities Work Plan and the
Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan. The PSFPC will report to the School
Board, the County, and the Cities on whether or not the proposed Five-Year
Capital Improvement Plan maintains the adopted Level of Service in each
CSA.
SECTION 14 SPECIAL PROVISIONS
14.1 School Board Requirements. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the
School Board is or may be subject to the requirements of the Florida and United
States Constitutions and other state or federal statutes regarding the operation of
the public school system and the rules by the State Board of Education or
Commissioner of Education.
Deleted: . A capacity reservation fee will be
established during
Deleted: regulatory phase of this process.
Deleted: .¶
¶
Deleted: ¶
Formatted: Font: Not Bold
Deleted: appoint a chairperson,
Deleted: , semi-
Deleted: in mid-September and mid-March
Deleted: A
Deleted: semiannual meeting
Formatted: Font color: Red
Deleted: 13)(g)(
Deleted: c),
Deleted: preparing an annual assessment report
on
Deleted: The report will be made available
Formatted: Font color: Red, Highlight
Deleted: public and presented at
Deleted: March meeting
Formatted: Font color: Red
Formatted: Font: Not Bold
Deleted: be invited to attend all meetings
referenced in Section 2 and shall
Moved (insertion) [5]
Deleted: The PSFPC shall evaluate
Deleted: effectiveness of the CSAs for measuring
the LOS and consider making recommendations to
amend the CSA Map.¶
Moved up [5]: C.
Deleted: By August 1st
Deleted: by adding enough projects to increase
the capacity. The PSFPC will examine the need to
eliminate any permanent student station shortfalls
by including required modernization of existing
facilities, and by providing permanent student
stations for the projected growth in enrollment over
each of the five (5) years covered by the plan
Deleted: ¶
1836
Page 26 of 37
Deleted: Page 26 of 41¶
Accordingly, the County, the Cities and the School Board agree that this
Agreement is not intended, and will not be construed, to interfere with, hinder, or
obstruct in any manner, the School Board’s constitutional and statutory obligation
and sovereignty to provide a uniform system of free public schools on a
Countywide basis or to require the School Board to confer with, or obtain the
consent of, the County or the Cities, as to whether that obligation has been
satisfied. Further, the County, the Cities and the School Board agree that this
Agreement is not intended and will not be construed to impose any duty or
obligation on the County or City for the School Board’s constitutional or statutory
obligation. The County and the Cities also acknowledge that the School Board’s
obligations under this Agreement may be superseded by state or federal court
orders or other state or federal legal mandates.
14.2 Land Use Authority. The Parties specifically acknowledge that each Local
Government is responsible for approving or denying comprehensive plan
amendments and development approvals within its own jurisdiction. Nothing
herein represents or authorizes a transfer of any of this authority to the School
Board.
SECTION 15 AMENDMENT PROCESS, NOTICE, AND TERM OF AGREEMENT
15.1 Amendment of the Agreement. This Agreement may be amended by written
consent of no less than eighty-eight percent (88%) of all Parties to this Agreement
with the exception of the provisions noted below. The Agreement will remain in
effect until amended in accordance with Florida Statutes.
A. Amendment of Section 11.2.B shall require the written consent of all parties.
B. The repeal of School Concurrency shall require the written consent of all
Parties.
C. Amendment of any part of the Agreement that, upon the School Board’s
reasonable determination, would necessitate a revision of school attendance
zones requires the consent of the School Board. The School Board must consider
alternatives to revision of attendance zones that would create voluntary student
transfers before determining whether the proposed amendment would necessitate
a revision of school attendance zones. Nothing in this section shall be interpreted
as infringing on the School board’s absolute right to determine school attendance
zones in accordance with Florida law and School Board policy.
D. Amendment of this Section 15.1 shall require the written consent of all Parties.
15.2 Notice Requirements. Any notices provided pursuant to this Agreement shall be
sent to the following addresses:
City Manager
City of Altamonte Springs
225 Newburyport Avenue
Altamonte Springs, Florida 32701
City Manager
City of Casselberry
95 Triplet Lake Drive
Casselberry, Florida 32707
City Manager
City of Sanford
300 North Park Avenue
Sanford, Florida 32771
City Manager
City of Winter Springs
1126 East State Road 434
Winter Springs, Florida 32708
Deleted: ¶
Formatted: Highlight
Deleted: parties
Formatted: Font: 9 pt
Formatted Table
Deleted:
Formatted: Font: 9 pt
Formatted: Font: 9 pt
Deleted:
Formatted: Font: 9 pt
Deleted:
Formatted: Font: 9 pt
Formatted: Font: 9 pt
1837
Page 27 of 37
Deleted: Page 27 of 41¶
City Manager
City of Lake Mary
100 North Country Club Road
Lake Mary, Florida 32746
City Manager
City of Longwood
175 West Warren Avenue
Longwood, Florida 32750
City Manager
City of Oviedo
400 Alexandria Boulevard
Oviedo, Florida 32765
County Manager
Seminole County Government
1101 East First Street
Sanford, Florida 32771
School Board Superintendent
Seminole County School Board
400 East Lake Mary Boulevard
Sanford, Florida 32773
15.3 Repeal of the Agreement. If the Florida Statute as it pertains to school planning
coordination and school concurrency is repealed, the Agreement may be
terminated by written consent of all parties of this Agreement.
15.4 Termination of the Agreement. No party to this Agreement may terminate its
participation in the agreement except through the exemption process in which a
municipality may not be required to participate in school concurrency when
demonstrating that all the requirements are no longer having a significant impact
on school attendance at the time of a local government Evaluation and Appraisal
Report, by providing a sixty (60) day written notice to other parties and to the
Florida Department of Economic Opportunity.
15.5 Withdrawal. Withdrawal from the Agreement by any party shall not alter the terms
of the Agreement with respect to the remaining signatories.
SECTION 16 RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES
16.1 Dispute Resolution. If the parties to this Agreement are unable to resolve any
issue in which they may be in disagreement covered in this Agreement, such
dispute will be resolved in accordance with governmental conflict resolution
procedures specified in Chapter 164, F.S.
SECTION 17 EXECUTION IN COUNTERPARTS
17.1 Agreement Execution. This Agreement shall be executed in any number of
counterparts, each of which so executed shall be deemed to be original, but all
such counterparts shall, together, constitute but one in the same instrument.
SECTION 18 SUCCESSION OF AGREEMENT
18.1 Succession of Agreement. This Agreement supersedes any previous agreement
regarding public school facilities planning upon the effective date of this
Agreement.
SECTION 19 EFFECTIVE DATE
19.1 Effective Date. This Agreement becomes effective upon full execution of the last
party.
Deleted:
Formatted: Font: 9 pt
Deleted:
Formatted: Font: 9 pt
Deleted:
Formatted: Font: 9 pt
Deleted:
Formatted: Font: 9 pt
Deleted: ¶
Formatted: Font: 10 pt
Deleted: , per Section 163.3177(12)(b), F.S.,
Deleted: at
Deleted: Community Affairs
Deleted:
Deleted: ¶
Deleted: agreement
Deleted: as
Deleted: January 1, 2008.
1838
Page 28 of 37
Deleted: Page 28 of 41¶
ATTEST: CITY OF ALTAMONTE SPRINGS
____________________________ By:_________________________
, City Clerk , Mayor
Date: _______________________
2021 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND
SCHOOL CONCURRENCY
Seminole County, Florida
Deleted: Section Break (Next Page)
Deleted: PATSY WAINWRIGHT
Deleted: RUSSEL HAUCK
Deleted: ¶
¶
¶
2007
Deleted: ¶
Deleted: AS AMENDED JANUARY 2008
Moved down [6]: Seminole County, Florida¶
¶
1839
Page 29 of 37
Deleted: Page 29 of 41¶
ATTEST: CITY OF CASSELBERRY
____________________________ By:_________________________
,City Clerk , Mayor
Date: _______________________
2021 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND
SCHOOL CONCURRENCY
Seminole County, Florida
Deleted: THELMA MCPHERSON,
Deleted: BOB GOFF
Deleted: ¶
¶
2007
Deleted: ¶
Deleted: AS AMENDED JANUARY 2008
Moved (insertion) [6]
Moved down [7]: Seminole County, Florida¶
¶
Formatted: Font: Not Bold
1840
Page 30 of 37
Deleted: Page 30 of 41¶
ATTEST: CITY OF LAKE MARY
____________________________ By:_________________________
, City Clerk , Mayor
Date: _______________________
2021 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND
SCHOOL CONCURRENCY
Seminole County, Florida
Deleted: CAROL FOSTER
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1", First line: 0.5"
Deleted: THOMAS C. GREENE
Deleted: ¶
¶
¶
2007
Deleted: ¶
Deleted: AS AMENDED JANUARY 2008
Moved (insertion) [7]
Formatted: Font: Not Bold
Formatted: Left
Deleted: Seminole County, Florida¶
1841
Page 31 of 37
Deleted: Page 31 of 41¶
ATTEST: CITY OF LONGWOOD
____________________________ By:_________________________
, City Clerk , Mayor
Date: _______________________
2021 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND
SCHOOL CONCURRENCY
Seminole County, Florida
Deleted: SARAH M. MIRUS
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", First line: 0.5"
Deleted: JOHN C. MAINGOT
Deleted: ¶
¶
2007
Deleted: ¶
Deleted: AS AMENDED JANUARY 2008
Moved (insertion) [8]
Moved down [9]: Seminole County, Florida¶
¶
1842
Page 32 of 37
Deleted: Page 32 of 41¶
ATTEST: CITY OF OVIEDO
____________________________ By:_________________________
, City Clerk , Mayor
Date: _______________________
2021 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND
SCHOOL CONCURRENCY
Seminole County, Florida
Deleted: BARBARA BARBOUR
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1", First line: 0.5"
Deleted: MARY LOU ANDREWS
Deleted: ¶
¶
2007
Deleted: ¶
Deleted: AS AMENDED JANUARY 2008
Moved (insertion) [9]
Moved down [10]: Seminole County, Florida¶
¶
1843
Page 33 of 37
Deleted: Page 33 of 41¶
ATTEST: CITY OF SANFORD
____________________________ By:_________________________
, City Clerk , Mayor
Date: _______________________
2021 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND
SCHOOL CONCURRENCY
Seminole County, Florida
Deleted: JANET R. DOUGHERTY
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1", First line: 0.5"
Deleted: LINDA KUHN
Deleted: ¶
¶
2007
Deleted: ¶
Deleted: AS AMENDED JANUARY 2008
Moved (insertion) [10]
Moved down [11]: Seminole County, Florida¶
¶
1844
Page 34 of 37
Deleted: Page 34 of 41¶
ATTEST: CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
____________________________ By:_________________________
, City Clerk , Mayor
Date: _______________________
2021 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND
SCHOOL CONCURRENCY
Seminole County, Florida
Deleted: ANDREA LORENZO-LUAVES
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1", First line: 0.5"
Deleted: JOHN F. BUSH
Deleted: ¶
¶
2007
Deleted: ¶
Deleted: AS AMENDED JANUARY 2008
Moved (insertion) [11]
Moved down [12]: Seminole County, Florida¶
¶
1845
Page 35 of 37
Deleted: Page 35 of 41¶
ATTEST: SCHOOL BOARD OF SEMINOLE
COUNTY, FLORIDA
____________________________ By:_________________________
Walt Griffin, Ed.D., Superintendent , Chairman
Date: _______________________
2021 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND
SCHOOL CONCURRENCY
Seminole County, Florida
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 3.5"
Deleted: CITY
Deleted: LAKE MARY
Deleted: DR. BILL VOGEL,
Deleted: DIANE BAUER
Deleted: ¶
¶
¶
2007
Deleted: ¶
Deleted: AS AMENDED JANUARY 2008
Moved (insertion) [12]
Moved up [8]: Seminole County, Florida¶
¶
1846
Page 36 of 37
Deleted: Page 36 of 41¶
ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA
____________________________ By:_________________________
, Chairman
Clerk to the Board of County
Commissioners of Seminole Date: _______________________
County, Florida
2021 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND
SCHOOL CONCURRENCY
Seminole County, Florida
Deleted: MARYANNE MORSE BRENDA
CAREY
Deleted: ¶
¶
2007
Deleted: ¶
Deleted: AS AMENDED JANUARY 2008
1847
Page 37 of 37
Deleted: Page 37 of 41¶
APPENDIX A
CONCURRENCY SERVICE AREAS (CSAs)
CSA - ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
E-0 Goldsboro Elementary (Districtwide Magnet)
E-1 Geneva & Walker Elementary
E-2 Lawton & Stenstrom Elementary
E-3 Carillon & Partin Elementary
E-4 Evans & Rainbow Elementary
E-5 East Brook & Red Bug Elementary
E-6 Casselberry & Sterling Park Elementary
E-7 Keeth & Layer Elementary
E-8 English Estates & Lake Orienta Elementary
E-9 Highlands & Winter Springs Elementary
E-10 Longwood & Woodlands Elementary
E-11 Altamonte & Spring Lake Elementary
E-12 Bear Lake & Forest City Elementary
E-13 Sabal Point & Wekiva Elementary
E-14 Heathrow & Lake Mary Elementary
E-15 Crystal Lake & Wicklow Elementary (Region 2)
E-16 Bentley, Idyllwilde, & Wilson Elementary (Region 1)
E-17 Hamilton, Midway, & Pine Crest Elementary (Region 3)
CSA-MIDDLE SCHOOL
M-1 Chiles Middle School
M-2 Jackson Heights Middle School
M-3 Tuskawilla Middle School
M-4 Indian Trails Middle School
M-5 South Seminole Middle School
M-6 Milwee Middle School
M-7 Teague Middle School
M-8 Rock Lake Middle School
M-9 Greenwood Lakes Middle School
M-10 Millennium Middle School
M-11 Sanford Middle School
M-12 Markham Woods Middle School
CSA - HIGH SCHOOL
H-0 Crooms Academy (Districtwide Magnet)
H-1 Hagerty High School
H-2 Oviedo High School
H-3 Winter Springs High School
H-4 Lake Howell High School
H-5 Lyman High School
H-6 Lake Brantley High School
H-7 Lake Mary High School
H-8 Seminole High School
Formatted: Font: 18 pt
Formatted: Normal, Left, Tab stops: Not at 0.5" + 1" +
1.5"
Deleted: “
Formatted: Font: 18 pt
Deleted: ”
Formatted: Font: 18 pt
Deleted: Concurrency Service Area Maps (CSA)¶
¶
¶
¶
¶
Page Break
APPENDIX “A” Cont.¶
Concurrency Service Area Maps (CSA)¶
¶
¶
¶
¶... [15]
Formatted: Plain Text, Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.5",
Space After: 6 pt
1848
Page 4: [1] Deleted Author
Page 4: [2] Deleted Author
Page 4: [2] Deleted Author
Page 4: [3] Formatted Author
Space After: 0 pt
Page 4: [4] Deleted Author
Page 4: [5] Formatted Author
Font: Bold
Page 4: [5] Formatted Author
Font: Bold
Page 4: [6] Formatted Author
Font: Bold
Page 6: [7] Deleted Author
Page 6: [8] Deleted Author
Page 6: [9] Deleted Author
Page 6: [10] Deleted Author
Page 6: [11] Deleted Author
Page 15: [12] Deleted Author
Page 15: [13] Deleted Author
Page 17: [14] Deleted Author
Page 37: [15] Deleted Author
1849
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
nn
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
Lake Jesup
Lake Monroe
Lake Harney
£¤17
£¤92
£¤441
£¤92
£¤17
£¤92
£¤17
£¤17
£¤17
§¨¦4
§¨¦4
LAYER
EVANS
KEETH
MIDWAY
GENEVA
WALKER
WEKIVA
LAWTON
PARTIN
WILSON
BENTLEY
WICKLOW
RED BUG RAINBOW
LONGWOOD
HAMILTON
CARILLON
HEATHROW
HIGHLANDS
GOLDSBORO
STENSTROM
LAKE MARY
EASTBROOK
BEAR LAKE
ALTAMONTE
WOODLANDS
PINE CREST
IDYLLWILDE
CASSELBERRYSPRING LAKE
FOREST CITY
SABAL POINT
CRYSTAL LAKE
LAKE ORIENTA
STERLING PARK
WINTER SPRINGS
ENGLISH ESTATES
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c)OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Seminole County Public Schools Elementary School Attendance Zones
±
0 4 82Miles
Data presented is provided “as is” at the time the map wasprepared. The viewer acknowledges andaccepts the limitations of the data, including thefact that the data is dynamic and in a constantstate of maintenance, correction and update.
PREPARED BY: Seminole County Public Schools
July 2021
Legend
n Elementary School Locations
1850
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5 5
CHILES
MILWEE
TEAGUE
SANFORD
ROCK LAKE
MILLENNIUM
TUSKAWILLA
MARKHAM WOODS
INDIAN TRAILS
SOUTH SEMINOLE
JACKSON HEIGHTS
GREENWOOD LAKES
Lake Jesup
Lake Monroe
Lake Harney
£¤17
£¤92
£¤441
£¤92
£¤17 £¤92
£¤92
£¤17
£¤17
£¤17
§¨¦4
§¨¦4
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c)OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Seminole County Public Schools Middle School Attendance Zones
±
0 4 82Miles
Data presented is provided “as is” at the time the map wasprepared. The viewer acknowledges andaccepts the limitations of the data, including thefact that the data is dynamic and in a constantstate of maintenance, correction and update.
PREPARED BY: Seminole County Public Schools
July 2021
Legend
5 Middle School Locations
1851
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
LYMAN
OVIEDO
HAGERTY
SEMINOLE
LAKE MARY
LAKE HOWELL
LAKE BRANTLEY
WINTER SPRINGS
Lake Jesup
Lake Monroe
Lake Harney
£¤17
£¤92
£¤441
£¤92
£¤17 £¤92
£¤92
£¤17
£¤17
£¤17
§¨¦4
§¨¦4
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c)OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Seminole County Public Schools High School Attendance Zones
±
0 4 82Miles
Data presented is provided “as is” at the time the map wasprepared. The viewer acknowledges andaccepts the limitations of the data, including thefact that the data is dynamic and in a constantstate of maintenance, correction and update.
PREPARED BY: Seminole County Public Schools
July 2021
Legend
5 High School Locations
1852
CITY COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 08 , 2021 AT 6:30 PM
CITY HALL - COMMISSION CHAMBERS
1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434, WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
1853
C I T Y C O M M I S S I O N M I N U T E S | R E G U L A R M E E T I N G | M O N D A Y , N O V E M B E R 0 8 , 2 0 2 1 | P A G E 2 O F 9
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Kevin McCann called the Regular Meeting of Monday, November 8, 2021 of the
City Commission to order at 6:30 p.m. in the Commission Chambers of the Municipal
Building (City Hall, 1126 East State Road 434, Winter Springs, Florida 32708).
Roll Call:
Mayor Kevin McCann, present
Deputy Mayor Ted Johnson, present
Commissioner Matt Benton, present
Commissioner Kevin Cannon, present
Commissioner TiAnna Hale, present
Commissioner Rob Elliott, present
Deputy City Manager Casey Howard, present
Assistant City Attorney Kristin Eick, present
City Clerk Christian Gowan, present
Commissioner Cannon asked that Item 500 be heard prior to the Public Hearings
Agenda. There was no objection.
The City Clerk noted a typographical update on the attachment for Item 300, noted
an updated copy had been provided on the dais and would be made available on the
City website.
AWARDS AND PRESENTATIONS
100) Proclamation Expressing Appreciation for Zechariah Cartledge
Mayor McCann presented a proclamation to Zechariah Cartledge in honor of his
contributions and promotion of the City of Winter Springs.
101) Update on Orange Avenue
Mr. Christopher Schmidt, Director, Community Development Director noted the
previously approved settlement agreement had been upheld and invited questions.
INFORMATIONAL AGENDA
200) Current Development Projects Summary
No discussion
1854
C I T Y C O M M I S S I O N M I N U T E S | R E G U L A R M E E T I N G | M O N D A Y , N O V E M B E R 0 8 , 2 0 2 1 | P A G E 3 O F 9
PUBLIC INPUT
Mayor McCann opened Public Input
Ms. Gina Shafer, Winter Springs Village, Winter Springs spoke about the need for
more meetings and the importance of keeping track of board/committee
attendance.
Ms. Pia Valenciano , 317 McLeod’s Way, Winter Springs shared concerns about the
Winter Springs Marketplace development, and noted HOA board efforts
Mr. William Morrisey, 965 Sequoia Drive, Winter Springs asked about activity at a
convenience store and potential capping of wells.
Mr. Schmidt noted he was aware of a Florida Department of Environmental
Protection permit issued regarding removal of gas tank fragments but that he was
not aware of any plans to place new tanks.
Mayor McCann closed Public Input.
CONSENT AGENDA
300) Final Budget Amendment for Fiscal Year 2020-2021
No discussion
301) Minutes from the October 25, 2021 City Commission Regular Meeting
No discussion
"MOTION TO APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA." MOTION BY DEPUTY MAYOR
JOHNSON. SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER HALE. DISCUSSION.
VOTE: BENTON (AYE); CANNON (AYE); JOHNSON (AYE); HALE (AYE); ELLIOTT
(AYE)
MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
REGULAR AGENDA
500) The 2021 Interlocal Agreement (ILA) for Public School Facility Planning and
School Concurrency Presentation
Mr. Schmidt provided a brief summary about the Interlocal Agreement process and
introduced Mr. Richard LeBlanc, Seminole County Public Schools (SCPS), Director of
1855
C I T Y C O M M I S S I O N M I N U T E S | R E G U L A R M E E T I N G | M O N D A Y , N O V E M B E R 0 8 , 2 0 2 1 | P A G E 4 O F 9
Project Management and Facilities and Mr. Chad Wilsky, SCPS Assistant
Superintendent, Operations.
Mr. LeBlanc presented on the history of the ILA, proposed changes, and frequently
asked questions.
Mayor reviewed process
Discussion followed on concerns with the proposed Concurrency Service Areas
(CSAs), proposed changes which would allow 88% of parties to make changes to the
Interlocal Agreement, bussing times, and cost-effectiveness of certain School Board
policies.
Mr. Gregg Johnson, Seminole County Public Schools, Assistant Attorney spoke about
the rationale for the proposed changes to the agreement and noted that certain
aspects would still require 100% agreement from all parties.
Further discussion followed on proposed language changes in the agreement, the
desire for regular review periods, development, and the importance of reliable
information to consider when developments are being considered for approval.
Commissioners agreed they would like to further review with the City A ttorney and
propose language changes. Commissioners thanked the representatives from SCPS
for their willingness to discuss and asked that the item be brought back at a later
date.
"MOTION TO APPROVE EXTENDING THE MEETING THROUGH SECOND PUBLIC
INPUT." MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CANNON. SECONDED BY DEPUTY MAYOR
JOHNSON. DISCUSSION.
MOTION PASSED WITH UNANIMOUS CONSENT.
PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA
400) The Community Development Department, Planning Division requests that
the City Commission hold a Public Hearing to consider Evaluation and
Appraisal Report (EAR) based amendments to the Comprehensive Plan
(Ordinance 2021-08), amending the Comprehensive Plan related to the
Recreation and Open Space Element.
Mr. Schmidt introduced Item 400, reviewed history, and staff's recommendation.
1856
C I T Y C O M M I S S I O N M I N U T E S | R E G U L A R M E E T I N G | M O N D A Y , N O V E M B E R 0 8 , 2 0 2 1 | P A G E 5 O F 9
Discussion followed on proposed additional languages, specifically regarding Policy
1.5.6. Staff noted no objections to the proposed addition.
“MOTION TO READ BY TITLE ONLY.” MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CANNON.
SECONDED BY DEPUTY MAYOR JOHNSON. DISCUSSION.
MOTION PASSED WITH UNANIMOUS CONSENT.
Assistant City Attorney Kristin Eick read Ordinance 2021-08 by title only.
Mayor McCann opened the Public Hearing for Item 400
No one spoke.
Mayor McCann closed the Public Hearing for Item 400
"MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 400 AS REVISED ON POLICY 1.5.6 WITH FOUR (4)
WORDS PRECEDING PROVIDE, ‘EXPLORE FUNDING SOURCES TO…’" MOTION BY
COMMISSIONER CANNON. SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER HALE. DISCUSSION.
VOTE: CANNON (AYE); HALE (AYE); BENTON (AYE); JOHNSON (AYE); ELLIOTT
(AYE)
MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
401) The Community Development Department, Planning Division requests that
the City Commission hold a Public Hearing to consider Evaluation and
Appraisal Report (EAR) based amendments to the Comprehensive Plan
(Ordinance 2021-07), amending the Comprehensive Plan related to the
Capital Improvements Element.
Mr. Schmidt introduced the item, reviewed history, and provided staff's
recommendation.
“MOTION TO READ BY TITLE ONLY.” MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CANNON.
SECONDED BY DEPUTY MAYOR JOHNSON. DISCUSSION.
MOTION PASSED WITH UNANIMOUS CONSENT.
Assistant City Attorney Eick read Ordinance 2021-07 by title only.
Mayor McCann opened the Public Hearing for Item 401
No one spoke.
1857
C I T Y C O M M I S S I O N M I N U T E S | R E G U L A R M E E T I N G | M O N D A Y , N O V E M B E R 0 8 , 2 0 2 1 | P A G E 6 O F 9
Mayor McCann closed the Public Hearing for Item 401.
Discussion followed on proposed changes to several policies and objectives.
Mayor McCann noted that substantial changes were being proposed and suggested
sending the item back to Staff to incorporate changes, discussing the item further
with the City Attorney, and allowing sufficient time to review.
Mayor McCann opened the Public Hearing for Item 401.
Mr. William Morrisey, 965 Sequoia Drive, Winter Springs asked about potential
compensation from developers for schools.
Ms. Loretta Ames, 150 Third Street, Winter Springs spoke about the importance of
stability for children in their schools.
Mayor McCann closed the Public Hearing for Item 401.
Mr. Schmidt noted Staff was comfortable with the changes and requested a motion
to continue the item to a time date certain.
"MOTION TO CONTINUE TO TIME DATE CERTAIN OF DECEMBER 13, 2021." MOTION
BY DEPUTY MAYOR JOHNSON. SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER HALE.
DISCUSSION.
VOTE: BENTON (AYE); CANNON (AYE); JOHNSON (AYE); HALE (AYE); ELLIOTT
(AYE)
MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
REGULAR AGENDA
501) Appointment Opportunities for City Boards and Committees
“MOTION TO REAPPOINT ANDREW ZACHARIAS TO THE PARKS AND
RECREATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE.” MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CANNON.
SECONDED BY DEPUTY MAYOR JOHNSON. DISCUSSION.
MOTION PASSED WITH UNANIMOUS CONSENT.
“MOTION TO APPOINT KEN SPALTHOFF TO THE DISTRICTING COMMISSION.”
MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CANNON. SECONDED BY DEPUTY MAYOR
JOHNSON. DISCUSSION.
1858
C I T Y C O M M I S S I O N M I N U T E S | R E G U L A R M E E T I N G | M O N D A Y , N O V E M B E R 0 8 , 2 0 2 1 | P A G E 7 O F 9
MOTION PASSED WITH UNANIMOUS CONSENT.
“MOTION TO APPONT MICHAEL ELY TO THE DISTRICTING COMMISSION.”
MOTION BY COMMISSIONER ELLIOTT. SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER CANNON.
DISCUSSION.
MOTION PASSED WITH UNANIMOUS CONSENT.
“MOTION TO APPOINT ROBERT MILLER TO THE DISTRICTING COMMISSION.”
MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BENTON. SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER CANNON.
DISCUSSION.
MOTION PASSED WITH UNANIMOUS CONSENT.
502) New Business
Mayor McCann noted he planned to reach out to Emergency Management and
encouraged all Commissioners learn their roles in these situations.
Commissioners agreed on the importance and suggested a potential closed
meeting to discuss the topic.
REPORTS
600) Deputy City Manager Casey Howard
Noted the upcoming Veteran Memorial Event on Thursday, November 11, 2021
601) Assistant City Attorney Kristin Eick
Noted that CPH had indicated availability on December 6, 2021 to attend a
Special Meeting
602) City Clerk Christian Gowan
No report
603) Seat Five Commissioner Rob Elliott
Noted the time limits on agenda item discussion and efforts to implement.
604) Mayor Kevin McCann
Noted that Hometown Harvest was a big success and spoke about the many
upcoming events planned in the City.
1859
1860
1861
SCHOOL CAPACITY ANALYSISSeminole County Public SchoolsAlphabetical ORDEREnrollment 10-15-2021 SURVEY 2 ENROLLMENT STATUS ELEMENTARYEnrollment 10-9-2020Enrollment 10-15-2021Growth PERM STUDENT STATIONS SCHOOL PROGRAM CAPACITY (100%) OVER(-) BELOW(+) CAPACITY % OF PERM PROGRAM CAPACITY ENROLLMENT-v-PERM CAPACITY STATUS TEMPORARY STUDENT STATIONS SCHOOL PROGRAM CAPACITY INCL PORTABLES OVER(-) BELOW(+) CAPACITY % OF PROGRAM CAPACITY INCLUDING PORTABLES ENROLLMENT-v-PROGRAM CAPACITY INCL PORTABLES STATUS Altamonte ElementaryE-7 606 614 8 941 941 327 65.2%Below Capacity0 941 327 65.2%Below CapacityBear Lake ElementaryE-8 947 904 -43 1,147 1,147 243 78.8%Below Capacity0 1,147 243 78.8%Below CapacityBentley ElementaryR-1 & 2E-9 957 961 4 999 999 38 96.2%Near Capacity0 999 38 96.2%Near CapacityCarillon ElementaryE-2 984 949 -35 1,044 1,044 95 90.9%Approaching Capacity0 1,044 95 90.9%Approaching CapacityCasselberry ElementaryE-5 699 711 12 788 788 77 90.2%Approaching Capacity22 810 99 87.8%Below CapacityCrystal LakeR-2E-9 704 677 -27 879 879 202 77.0%Below Capacity0 879 202 77.0%Below CapacityEastbrook ElementaryE-4 748 691 -57 848 848 157 81.5%Below Capacity0 848 157 81.5%Below CapacityEnglish Estates ElementaryE-4 719 680 1 839 839 159 81.0%Below Capacity0 839 159 81.0%Below CapacityEvans ElementaryE-2 852 882 30 958 958 76 92.1%Approaching Capacity22 980 98 90.0%Approaching CapacityForest City ElementaryE-8 796 802 6 963 963 161 83.3%Below Capacity0 963 161 83.3%Below CapacityGeneva ElementaryE-1538514 -24 590 590 76 87.1%Below Capacity66 656 142 78.4%Below CapacityGoldsboro ElementaryE-9 842 820 -22 1,102 1,102 282 74.4%Below Capacity0 1,102 282 74.4%Below CapacityHamilton ElementaryR-3E-10 623 660 37 794 794 134 83.1%Below Capacity0 794 134 83.1%Below CapacityHeathrow ElementaryE-6 759 777 18 813 813 36 95.6%Near Capacity110 923 146 84.2%Below CapacityHighlands Elementary E-6 554 533 -21 632 632 99 84.3%Below Capacity36 668 135 79.8%Below CapacityIdyllwilde ElementaryR-1E-9 777 782 5 846 846 64 92.4%Approaching Capacity72 918 136 85.2%Below CapacityKeeth Elementary E-3600599 -1 633 633 34 94.6%Approaching Capacity88 721 122 83.1%Below CapacityLake Mary ElementaryE-6 850 871 21 976 976 105 89.2%Below Capacity88 1,064 193 81.9%Below CapacityLake Orienta ElementaryE-7 652 629 -23 798 798 169 78.8%Below Capacity0 798 169 78.8%Below CapacityLawton ElementaryE-1764786 22 811 811 25 96.9%Near Capacity0 811 25 96.9%Near CapacityLayer Elementary E-3 542 571 29 692 692 121 82.5%Below Capacity22 714 143 80.0%Below CapacityLongwood Elementary E-6 570 619 49 617 617 -2 100.3%Over Capacity0 617 -2 100.3%Over CapacityMidway ElementaryR-3E-10 798 772 -26 1,106 1,106 334 69.8%Below Capacity0 1,106 334 69.8%Below CapacityPartin ElementaryE-2 664 640 -24 717 717 77 89.3%Below Capacity44 761 121 84.1%Below CapacityPine Crest ElementaryR-3E-10 636 638 2 1,082 1,082 444 59.0%Below Capacity0 1,082 444 59.0%Below CapacityRainbow ElementaryE-3754792 38 726 726 -66 109.1%Over Capacity0 726 -66 109.1%Over CapacityRed Bug ElementaryE-4 774 773 -1 908 908 135 85.1%Below Capacity0 908 135 85.1%Below CapacitySabal Point ElementaryE-8 888 888 0 974 974 86 91.2%Approaching Capacity0 974 86 91.2%Approaching CapacitySpring Lake ElementaryE-8 551 575 24 793 793 218 72.5%Below Capacity22 815 240 70.6%Below CapacityStenstrom ElementaryE-2 641 627 -14 1,005 1,005 378 62.4%Below Capacity0 1,005 378 62.4%Below CapacitySterling Park ElementaryE-3 787 751 -36 962 962 211 78.1%Below Capacity0 962 211 78.1%Below CapacityWalker ElementaryE-1 742 734 -8 925 925 191 79.4%Below Capacity0 925 191 79.4%Below CapacityWekiva ElementaryE-8 798 858 60 864 864 6 99.3%Near Capacity0 864 6 99.3%Near CapacityWicklow ElementaryR-2E-9 682 679 -3 820 820 141 82.8%Below Capacity44 864 185 78.6%Below CapacityWilson ElementaryR-1E-9 909 897 -12 1,029 1,029 132 87.2%Below Capacity18 1,047 150 85.7%Below CapacityWinter Springs Elementary E-5 605 583 -22 721 721 138 80.9%Below Capacity0 721 138 80.9%Below CapacityWoodlands Elementary E-7 780 787 7 864 864 77 91.1%Approaching Capacity66 930 143 84.6%Below CapacityTOTAL27,092 27,026 -2632,206 32,2065,11484.1% 720 32,9265,83482.3% SCHOOL CAPACITY INCLUDING PORTABLES PERMANENT BUILDING SCHOOL CAPACITY REGION DOE ASSIGNED STUDENT STATIONS & CAPACITY (FISH) 2018 CSA ENROLLMENT COMPARISON 2020-21 VS 2021-22 (PK-12) "BELOW CAPACITY" Available Capacity >10% of school capacity. "APROACHING CAPACITY" Available Capacity <10%, > 5% of school capacity. "NEAR CAPACITY" Available Capacity < 5% of school capacity.Page 1 of 2Facilities Planning Department1862
SCHOOL CAPACITY ANALYSISSeminole County Public SchoolsAlphabetical ORDEREnrollment 10-15-2021CENTERSEnrollment 10-9-2020Enrollment 10-15-2021GrowthPERM STUDENT STATIONSSCHOOL (FISH) CAPACITY (100%) OVER(-) BELOW(+) CAPACITY % OF PERM PROGRAM CAPACITY ENROLLMENT-v-PERM CAPACITY STATUS TEMPORARY STUDENT STATIONS SCHOOL PROGRAM CAPACITY INCL PORTABLES OVER(-) BELOW(+) CAPACITY % OF PROGRAM CAPACITY INCLUDING PORTABLES ENROLLMENT-v-PROGRAM CAPACITY INCL PORTABLES STATUS Endeavor* 42 39 -3 2609 2609 2,570 1.5%Below Capacity0 2,609 2,570 1.5%Below CapacityHopper Center* 16 11 -5 908 908 897 1.2%Below Capacity18 926 915 1.2%Below CapacityJourneys Academy27 57 30 440 396 339 14.4%Below Capacity0 440 383 13.0%Below Capacity*Utilization Factor 100 % SREF Section 6.1TOTAL85 107 223957 39133,8282.2% 18 3,9753,8902.1%MIDDLEEnrollment 10-9-2020Enrollment 10-15-2021GrowthPERM STUDENT STATIONSSCHOOL (FISH) CAPACITY (100%) OVER(-) BELOW(+) CAPACITY % OF PERM PROGRAM CAPACITY ENROLLMENT-v-PERM CAPACITY STATUS TEMPORARY STUDENT STATIONS SCHOOL PROGRAM CAPACITY INCL PORTABLES OVER(-) BELOW(+) CAPACITY % OF PROGRAM CAPACITY INCLUDING PORTABLES ENROLLMENT-v-PROGRAM CAPACITY INCL PORTABLES STATUS Chiles (New) Middle M-41,3121,278 -34 1,481 1,481 203 86.3%Below Capacity0 1,481 203 86.3%Below CapacityGreenwood Lakes Middle M-1 998 1,003 5 1,407 1,407 404 71.3%Below Capacity0 1,407 404 71.3%Below CapacityIndian Trails Middle M-3 1,208 1,215 1,400 1,560 1,560 345 77.9%Below Capacity0 1,560 345 77.9%Below CapacityJackson Heights Middle M-41,4041,431 27 1,544 1,544 113 92.7%Approaching Capacity88 1,632 201 87.7%Below CapacityMarkham Woods Middle M-1 1,051 1,041 -10 1,400 1,400 359 74.4%Below Capacity0 1,400 359 74.4%Below CapacityMillennium Middle (New) M-1 1,403 1,370 -33 1,937 1,937 567 70.7%Below Capacity0 1,937 567 70.7%Below CapacityMilwee Middle M-21,4321,414 -18 1,387 1,387 -27 101.9%Over Capacity110 1,497 83 94.5%Approaching CapacityRock Lake Middle M-2 1,062 987 -75 1,260 1,260 273 78.3%Below Capacity0 1,260 273 78.3%Below CapacitySanford Middle M-11,4231,321 -102 1,608 1,608 287 82.2%Below Capacity198 1,806 485 73.1%Below CapacitySouth Seminole Middle M-3 1,092 985 -107 1,349 1,349 364 73.0%Below Capacity44 1,393 408 70.7%Below CapacityTeague Middle M-2 1,265 1,181 -84 1,788 1,788 607 66.1%Below Capacity0 1,788 607 66.1%Below CapacityTuskawilla Middle M-3 1,171 1,100-71 1,389 1,389 289 79.2%Below Capacity0 1,389 289 79.2%Below CapacityTOTAL14,821 14,326 89818,110 18,1103,28981.8% 440 18,5503,72979.9%HIGHEnrollment 10-9-2020Enrollment 10-15-2021GrowthPERM STUDENT STATIONSSCHOOL (FISH) CAPACITY (100%) OVER(-) BELOW(+) CAPACITY % OF PERM PROGRAM CAPACITY ENROLLMENT-v-PERM CAPACITY STATUS TEMPORARY STUDENT STATIONS SCHOOL PROGRAM CAPACITY INCL PORTABLES OVER(-) BELOW(+) CAPACITY % OF PROGRAM CAPACITY INCLUDING PORTABLES ENROLLMENT-v-PROGRAM CAPACITY INCL PORTABLES STATUS Crooms* H-1 740 693 -47 954 811 118 85.5%Below Capacity0 811 118 85.5%Below CapacityHagerty High H-4 2,419 2,359 -60 2,799 2,799 440 84.3%Below Capacity0 2,799 440 84.3%Below CapacityLake Brantley High H-2 2,641 2,598 -43 3,136 3,136 538 82.8%Below Capacity0 3,136 538 82.8%Below CapacityLake Howell High H-3 2,223 2,239 16 2,472 2,472 233 90.6%Approaching Capacity0 2,472 233 90.6%Approaching CapacityLake Mary High H-1 2,681 2,631 -50 2,953 2,953 322 89.1%Below Capacity150 3,103 472 84.8%Below CapacityLyman High H-2 2,135 2,009 -126 2,681 2,681 672 74.9%Below Capacity172 2,853 844 70.4%Below CapacityOviedo High H-4 2,397 2,316 -81 2,978 2,978 662 77.8%Below Capacity0 2,978 662 77.8%Below CapacitySeminole High H-1 4,303 4,114 -189 5,124 5,124 1,010 80.3%Below Capacity0 5,124 1,010 80.3%Below CapacityWinter Springs High H-3 1,973 1,989 16 2,609 2,609 620 76.2%Below Capacity0 2,609 620 76.2%Below Capacity*Utilization Factor 85 % SREF Section 6.1TOTAL21,512 20,948 -56425,706 25,5634,05184.2% 322 25,8854,37383.1%DISTRICT TOTAL63,510 62,407 33079,979 79,792 16,282 79.6%Below Capacity1,500 81,336 17,826 78.1%Below CapacityPERMANENT BUILDING SCHOOL CAPACITYSCHOOL CAPACITY INCLUDING PORTABLESDOE ASSIGNED STUDENT
CSA CSA PERMANENT BUILDING SCHOOL CAPACITY SCHOOL CAPACITY INCLUDING PORTABLES DOE ASSIGNED STUDENT STATIONS & CAPACITY (FISH) 2018 CSA ENROLLMENT COMPARISON 2020-21 VS 2021-22 (PK-12) "BELOW CAPACITY" Available Capacity >10% of school capacity. "APROACHING CAPACITY" Available Capacity <10%, > 5% of school capacity. "NEAR CAPACITY" Available Capacity < 5% of school capacity.Page 2 of 2Facilities Planning Department1863
NENW
2,432 Units 18%
1,985 Units 15%SESW
3,104 Units 23%
6,030 Units 44%
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c)
OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
SCALDS as of Oc tober 2021Prop os ed Units
±
0 3.5 71.75
Miles
Data p res ented is p rovided “as is ” at the time the map w asp rep ared. The view er ac know ledges andac c ep ts the limitations of the data, inc luding thefac t that the data is dynamic and in a c ons tants tate of maintenanc e, c orrec tion and up date.
PREPARED BY: Seminole County Public Sc hools
October 2021
Legend
Units
1 - 30
31 - 75
76 - 150
151 - 300
301 - 1,310
Quardants
Seminole County Boundary
CityName
ALTAMONTE SPRINGS
CASSELBERRY
LAKE MARY
LONGWOOD
OVIEDO
SANFORD
WINTER SPRINGS
1864
541999792908475746260567948423331302010110318%Lake MonroeLake JesupSources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c)OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User CommunitySCALDS as of October 2021 (Northeast Quadrant)Proposed Units±0120.5MilesData presented is provided “as is” at the time the map wasprepared. The viewer acknowledges andaccepts the limitations of the data, including thefact that the data is dynamic and in a constantstate of maintenance, correction and update.PREPARED BY: Seminole County Public SchoolsOctober 2021LegendUnits1 - 3031 - 7576 - 150151 - 300301 - 1,310Quardants§¨¦4£¤17£¤441£¤17£¤17£¤92Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c)OpenStreetMap contributors,and the GIS user community12012‐19Kensington Reserve (Brisson West)375 328 4742015‐02Cameron Heights (Village A, D ‐ H and J)208 460 46552017‐20Cameron Heights Village B (EastGrove)17 0 1720 2018‐18 Riverside Oaks 130 24 10630 2018‐19 Cameron Heights Village "C" 76 0 76332018‐26 Florida Extruders Property 176 59 11742 2019‐08 Celery Oaks 112 0 11248 2019‐22 Celery Pointe 100 0 10056 2019‐31 Sylvestri Estates 430 0 43060 2020‐05 Celery Cove 37 34 362 2020‐08 River Run Preserve 94 0 94742021‐01Lake Monroe Shores Townhomes150 0 15075 2021‐02 First Street Station 32 0 3279 2021‐06 Skyway Townhomes 85 0 8584 2021‐11 Myrtle Estates Homes 36 0 3690 2021‐17 Ryder Reserve 5 0 5922021‐19(2019‐30)Cameron Heights Village C‐1 (SCALD RENEWED 4/22/2021 ‐ rlb)109 0 10997 2021‐24 Sanford Courtyard 10 0 1099 2021‐26 Stella Cove 8 0 8101 2021‐28 Celery Avenue Subdivision 93 0 93103 2021‐30 Kentucky Square 149 0 1492,432 905 2,244Number SCALD #Development Name UnitsCOs as of 10/15/2021Remaining Units1865
299989695918584837775745854504746459440373635322823131123%Lake MonroeSources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c)OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User CommunitySCALDS as of October 2021 (Northwest Quadrant)Proposed Units±01.530.75MilesData presented is provided “as is” at the time the map wasprepared. The viewer acknowledges andaccepts the limitations of the data, including thefact that the data is dynamic and in a constantstate of maintenance, correction and update.PREPARED BY: Seminole County Public SchoolsOctober 2021LegendUnits1 - 3031 - 7576 - 150151 - 300301 - 1,310QuardantsSeminole County BoundaryCityNameALTAMONTE SPRINGSCASSELBERRYLAKE MARYLONGWOODOVIEDOSANFORDWINTER SPRINGS§¨¦4£¤17£¤441£¤17£¤17£¤92Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c)OpenStreetMap contributors,and the GIS user community22013‐10 Lake Markham Landings 46 15 3111 2016‐19 Griffin Farm at Midtown 138 104 3413 2016‐29 Waterside II 9 2 718 2017‐13 Evergreen 95 30 6523 2017‐26 Terra Bona Estates 5 0 528 2018‐16Chateaux at Markham (no activity)10 0 1032 2018‐22 Broadstone Forest 260 120 14035 2018‐29 The Dwell at Lake Mary 272 0 27236 2018‐30 Estuary at St Johns (Gateway) 65 52 1337 2018‐31 Tesoro Townhomes 53 0 5340 2019‐03Allure on the Parkway/Encore Place290 3 28745 2019‐14Parkview at Lake Mary (FKA New Century)300 50 25046 2019‐20 Traditions at White Cedar 48 34 1447 2019‐21Via Foresta8 0 850 2019‐24 Crestwood Estates 20 10 1054 2019‐28 Vintage North Apts 310 0 31058 2020‐02Savta Reserve 14 0 1477 2021‐04 Sanford Station Apartments 294 0 29483 2021‐10 Novel Parkway Apartments 325 0 32585 2021‐12Bartam's Landing at St Johns (fka Gateway)31 0 3191 2021‐18 Seminole St Johns 352 0 35294 021‐21(2019‐12)Fountain Park PD 106 0 10695 2021‐22Sylvan Estates (fka Lake Sylvan Oaks, Phase 3)12 0 1296 2021‐23 The Cove at Sanford Farms 30 0 3098 2021‐25 Mayfair Cove 11 0 113,104 420 2,684COs as of 10/15/2021Remaining UnitsNumber SCALD # Development Name Units
1866
8763692289888617876726661575553525143382925151010215%Lake JesupLake HarneySources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c)OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User CommunitySCALDS as of October 2021 (Southeast Quadrant)Proposed Units±01.530.75MilesData presented is provided “as is” at the time the map wasprepared. The viewer acknowledges andaccepts the limitations of the data, including thefact that the data is dynamic and in a constantstate of maintenance, correction and update.PREPARED BY: Seminole County Public SchoolsOctober 2021LegendUnits1 - 3031 - 7576 - 150151 - 300301 - 1,310QuardantsSeminole County BoundaryCityNameALTAMONTE SPRINGSCASSELBERRYLAKE MARYLONGWOODOVIEDOSANFORDWINTER SPRINGS§¨¦4£¤17£¤17£¤17£¤92Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c)OpenStreetMap contributors,and the GIS user community3 2014‐21 Parkdale Place 96 81 156 2015‐29 Brighton Estates 12 0 127 2015‐31 Pinewood Estates 10 0 108 2016‐02Tuskawilla Crossing Re‐evaluation (2015‐25)379 371 810 2016‐17 Enclave at Dunmar 8 2 615 2016‐33 Northern Oaks resubmittal 35 13 2222 2017‐25 Estates at Wellington 24 1 2325 2018‐03 Hideaway Cove 92 39 5329 2018‐17 Winter Springs Townhomes 114 43 7138 2018‐32 Dwell at Oviedo reeval 2 300 0 30043 2019‐10 Modern Jamestown Reserve 10 0 1051 2019‐25 Chapman Pines 37 0 3752 2019‐26 Hideaway Cove Phs 33926 1353 2019‐27 Grove Ave Estates 9 1 855 2019‐29 Red Ember Estates 76 0 7657 2019‐32 Geneva Ski Lake 12 0 1261 2020‐06 NOMA PD 269 0 26966 2020‐16 Pine Aveneue Property 23 0 2369 2020‐26 RED EMBER ESTATES 19 0 1972 2020‐29 Park Square Homes 63 0 6376 2021‐03 Hickory Grove (The Gathering) 133 0 13378 2021‐05 Broadway Townhomes 20 0 2086 2021‐13 City Place (Oviedo) 50 0 5088 2021‐15 Towns at Tuskaloma Commons 111 0 11189 2021‐16 The Adel at Lake Jesup 14 0 14102 2021‐29 Loma Vista PUD 30 0 301,985 577 1,408Number SCALD # Development Name UnitsCOs as of 10/15/2021Remaining Units1867
91912938782818073717068676564635949444139342726242117161410044%Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c)OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User CommunitySCALDS as of October 2021 (Southwest Quadrant)Proposed Units±01.530.75MilesData presented is provided “as is” at the time the map wasprepared. The viewer acknowledges andaccepts the limitations of the data, including thefact that the data is dynamic and in a constantstate of maintenance, correction and update.PREPARED BY: Seminole County Public SchoolsOctober 2021LegendUnits1 - 3031 - 7576 - 150151 - 300301 - 1,310QuardantsSeminole County BoundaryCityNameALTAMONTE SPRINGSCASSELBERRYLAKE MARYLONGWOODOVIEDOSANFORDWINTER SPRINGS§¨¦4£¤17£¤441£¤17£¤17£¤92Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c)OpenStreetMap contributors, and theGIS user community8 2016‐05 Greenville at Casselberry 41 33 811 2016‐27 Village Green (Longwood) 12 0 1213 2016‐31Reserve at Lake Wildmere Phase 238 29 915 2016‐34 Klinger Property 94 63 3116 2017‐11 Legacy Place Townhomes 64 4 6018 2017‐17 Legacy at Sunbranch 17 14 320 2017‐23 Hawk's Crest (re eval 2017‐08) 707 566 14123 2017‐28 Spring Tree Village Phase 441 20 2125 2018‐08 Sand Lake Rd residential 13 0 1326 2018‐11 Myrtle Townhomes 10 0 10332018‐28Preserve at Maitland Townhomes10 8 238 2019‐02 Kiwi at Fern Lake 75 0 7540 2019‐06 Jefferson at Lake Howell 384 378 643 2019‐13 Longwood TOD Townhomes 52 0 5248 2019‐23 Oxford Place Phase 12450 24558 2020‐04 Reserve at Hillview 41 0 4162 2020‐09 Oxford Place Phase 23300 33063 2020‐10 Oxford Place Phase 32000 20064 2020‐14 Alta Cypress 342 0 34266 2020‐20 West Town Parkway (Amended)539 0 539672020‐23ADDISON LONGWOOD APARTMENTS277 0 27769 2020‐27 Iconn Commons 26 0 2670 2020‐28 Northridge Reserve 6 0 672 2020‐30 Lake Shore at Center Pointe 1319 0 131979 2021‐07 Slovak Garden Townhomes 138 0 13880 2021‐08 Hidden Oaks 105 0 10581 2021‐09 Marquis Townhomes 26 0 2686 2021‐14 Altamonte Springs Apartment 346 0 34692 2021‐20 The Hartley 264 0 26499 2021‐27 Solera Altamonte 268 0 2686,030 1,115 4,915Remaining UnitsNumber SCALD #Development Name UnitsCOs as of 10/15/20211868
SCALD NUM Name Quadrant UnitsCOs as of 10/15/2021Remaining UnitsTOTAL STATIONS RESERVED Type CSA ELM ELM SCHOOL SGR CALC SGR ACTRESERVED STATIONS REMAINING Name SCALD NUM CSA MID MID_SCHOOLSGR CALC SGR ACTRESERVED STATIONS REMAINING Name SCALD NUM CSA HIGH HIGH SCHOOLSGR CALCSGR ACTRESERVED STATIONS REMAINING2011‐06 Reserve at Alaqua NW 44 44022 SF‐Detached E‐6 Heathrow 10 10 0 Reserve at Alaqua 2011‐06 M‐1 Markham Woods 5 5 0Reserve at Alaqua 2011‐06 H‐1Lake Mary7702011‐09 Lake Jesup Estates NW 23 0237SF‐Detached E‐10 Region 3303Lake Jesup Estates 2011‐09 M‐1 Millennium 0 0 0 Lake Jesup Estates 2011‐09 H‐1Seminole 4 0 42011‐09 Lake Jesup Estates (Expired) NW‐23 0‐23‐7SF‐Detached E‐10 Region 3‐30‐3Lake Jesup Estates 2011‐09 M‐1 Millennium 0 0 0 Lake Jesup Estates 2011‐09 H‐1Seminole‐40‐42012‐12 Wyndham Preserve (Brisson East) NE 246 2460120 SF‐Detached E‐10 Region 3 55 55 0 Wyndham Preserve (Brisson East) 2012‐12 M‐1 Sanford 29 29 0 Wyndham Preserve (Brisson East) 2012‐12 H‐1Seminole 3636 02012‐19 Kensington Reserve (Brisson West) NE 375 32847184 SF‐Detached E‐10 Region 385778Kensington Reserve (Brisson West) 2012‐19 M‐1 Sanford 44 40 4 Kensington Reserve (Brisson West) 2012‐19 H‐1Seminole 5548 72013‐10 Lake Markham Landings NW 46 153122 SF‐Detached E‐9Region 1103 7Lake Markham Landings 2013‐10 M‐1 Markham Woods 5 2 3 Lake Markham Landings 2013‐10 H‐1Seminole 7 2 52013‐23Lake Irish Estates (Expired)NW 10 0104SF‐Detached E‐9Region 1202Lake Irish Estates 2013‐23 M‐1 Markham Woods 1 0 1 Lake Irish Estates 2013‐23 H‐1Seminole 1 0 12013‐23 Lake Irish Estates (Expired) NW‐10 0‐10‐4SF‐Detached E‐9Region 1‐20‐2Lake Irish Estates 2013‐23 M‐1 Markham Woods‐10‐1Lake Irish Estates 2013‐23 H‐1Seminole‐10‐12014‐05 Markham Point Subdivision SW 4 042SF‐Detached E‐7 Woodlands 1 0 1 Markham Point Subdivision 2014‐05 M‐1 Markham Woods 0 0 0 Markham Point Subdivision 2014‐05 H‐1Lake Mary 1 0 12014‐05 Markham Point Subdivision (Withdrawn) SW‐40‐4‐2SF‐Detached E‐7 Woodlands‐10‐1 Markham Point Subdivision2014‐05 M‐1 Markham Woods 0 0 0 Markham Point Subdivision2014‐05 H‐1Lake Mary‐10‐12014‐12 Emporia Hammock (Lake Charm) SE 52 52026 SF‐Detached E‐1Lawton 12 12 0Emporia Hammock (Lake Charm) 2014‐12 M‐4Jackson Heights 6 6 0 Emporia Hammock (Lake Charm) 2014‐12 H‐4Oviedo 8 8 02014‐14 Harpers Landing SE 10 0104SF‐Detached E‐1Lawton 2 0 2Harpers Landing 2014‐14 M‐4Jackson Heights 1 0 1 Harpers Landing 2014‐14 H‐4Oviedo 1 0 12014‐14 Harpers Landing (Expired) SE‐10 0‐10‐4SF‐Detached E‐1Lawton‐20‐2Harpers Landing 2014‐14 M‐4Jackson Heights‐10‐1Harpers Landing 2014‐14 H‐4Oviedo‐10‐12014‐21 Parkdale Place SE 96 811547 SF‐Detached E‐2 Evans 22 10 12 Parkdale Place 2014‐21 M‐4Jackson Heights 11 5 6 Parkdale Place 2014‐21 H‐4Oviedo 14 7 72014‐22 Jakubcin Place SE 64 06415 SF‐Attached E‐2 Evans 6 0 6 Jakubcin Place 2014‐22 M‐4Jackson Heights 4 0 4 Jakubcin Place 2014‐22 H‐4Oviedo 5 0 52014‐22 Jakubcin Place (Expired) SE‐64 0‐64‐15 SF‐Attached E‐2Evans‐60‐6 Jakubcin Place 2014‐22 M‐4Jackson Heights‐40‐4 Jakubcin Place 2014‐22 H‐4Oviedo‐50‐52015‐02 Cameron Heights (Village A, D ‐ H and J) NE 925 460465256 SF‐Detached & Attached E‐10 Region 3 115 29 86 Cameron Heights Re‐evaluation 2015‐02 M‐1 Millennium 63 16 47 Cameron Heights Re‐evaluation 2015‐02 H‐1Seminole 7820 582015‐07 Deer Lakes NW 33 03316 SF‐Detached & Attached E‐9Region 1707Deer Lakes 2015‐07 M‐1 Markham Woods 4 0 4 Deer Lakes 2015‐07 H‐1Seminole 5 0 52015‐07 Deer Lakes (Expired) NW‐33 0‐33‐16 SF‐Detached & AttachedE‐9Region 1‐70‐7 Deer Lakes 2015‐07 M‐1 Markham Woods‐40‐4 Deer Lakes 2015‐07 H‐1Seminole‐50‐52015‐27 Lake Sylvan Oaks NW 11 1105SF‐Detached E‐9Region 1220Lake Sylvan Oaks 2015‐27 M‐1 Markham Woods 1 0 1 Lake Sylvan Oaks 2015‐27 H‐1Seminole 2 1 12015‐28 Catalyst Apartments (Winter Springs Apartments) SE 279 4423560 MF E‐3 Layer 34 5 29 Catalyst Apartments (Winter Springs Apartments) 2015‐28 M‐3 Indian Trails 13 3 10 Catalyst Apartments (Winter Springs Apartments) 2015‐28 H‐3Winter Springs 13 2 112015‐29 Brighton Estates SE 12 0126SF‐Detached E‐2Evans 3 0 3Brighton Estates 2015‐29 M‐4Jackson Heights 1 0 1 Brighton Estates 2015‐29 H‐4Hagerty 2 0 22015‐31 Pinewood Estates SE 10 0103SF‐Attached E‐1 Lawton 1 0 1 Pinewood Estates 2015‐31 M‐4Jackson Heights 1 0 1 Pinewood Estates 2015‐31 H‐4Oviedo 1 0 12015‐33 Frost Estates SE 3 121SF‐Detached E‐1 Geneva 1 0 1 Frost Estates 2015‐33 M‐4 Chiles 0 0 0 Frost Estates 2015‐33 H‐4Oviedo 0 0 02016‐02 Tuskawilla Crossing Re‐evaluation (2015‐25) SE 385 267118187 SF‐Detached E‐3 Layer 86 66 20 Tuskawilla Crossing Re‐evaluation (2015‐25) 2016‐02 M‐3 Indian Trails 45 34 11 Tuskawilla Crossing Re‐evaluation (2015‐25) 2016‐02 H‐3Winter Springs 56 39 172016‐05 Greenville at Casselberry SW 41 33819 SF‐Detached E‐3 Sterling Park 8 7 1 Greenville at Casselberry 2016‐05 M‐3South Seminole 5 4 1 Greenville at Casselberry 2016‐05 H‐3Winter Springs 6 5 12016‐10 Windsor Square Townhomes NE 66 66015 SF‐Attached E‐3 Layer 6 6 0 Windsor Square Townhomes 2016‐10 M‐1 Millennium 4 4 0 Windsor Square Townhomes 2016‐10 H‐1Seminole 5 5 02016‐16 Uptown Altamonte Ps VI The Crane SW 299 029965 MF E‐7 Altamonte 37 0 37 Uptown Altamonte Ps VI The Crane 2016‐16 M‐2 Milwee 14 0 14 Uptown Altamonte Ps VI The Crane 2016‐16 H‐2Lyman 14 0 142016‐16 Uptown Altamonte Ps VI The Crane (Abandoned) SW‐299 0‐299‐65 MF E‐7Altamonte‐37 0‐37 Uptown Altamonte Ps VI The Crane 2016‐16 M‐2 Milwee‐14 0‐14 Uptown Altamonte Ps VI The Crane 2016‐16 H‐2Lyman‐14 0‐142016‐17 Enclave at Dunmar SE 8 264SF‐Detached E‐3 Sterling Park 2 1 1 Enclave at Dunmar 2016‐17 M‐3South Seminole 1 0 1 Enclave at Dunmar 2016‐17 H‐3Winter Springs 1 0 12016‐19 Griffin Farm at Midtown NW 138 1043445 SF‐Detached & Attached E‐6Lake Mary 20 15 5 Griffin Farm at Midtown 2016‐19 M‐1 Greenwood Lakes 10 8 2 Griffin Farm at Midtown 2016‐19 H‐1Lake Mary 15 10 52016‐23 Orange Creek NW 20 2009SF‐Detached E‐9Region 1440Orange Creek 2016‐23 M‐1Sanford 22 0 Orange Creek 2016‐23 H‐1Seminole 3 3 02016‐27 Village Green (Longwood) SW 12 0123MF E‐6 Longwood 1 0 1 Village Green (Longwood) 2016‐27 M‐1 Greenwood Lakes 1 0 1 Village Green (Longwood) 2016‐27 H‐1Lake Mary 1 0 12016‐29 Waterside II NW 9 274SF‐Detached E‐6Lake Mary 2 1 1 Waterside II 2016‐29 M‐1 Greenwood Lakes 1 0 1 Waterside II 2016‐29 H‐1Lake Mary 1 0 12016‐30 Lake Sylvan Oaks Phase 2NW14867SF‐Detached E‐9Region 1321Lake Sylvan Oaks Phase 2 2016‐30 M‐1 Markham Woods 2 1 1 Lake Sylvan Oaks Phase 2 2016‐30 H‐1Seminole 2 1 12016‐31 Reserve at Lake Wildmere Phase 2SW382999SF‐Attached E‐5Winter Springs 4 3 1 Reserve at Lake Wildmere Phase 2 2016‐31 M‐2 Milwee 2 2 0 Reserve at Lake Wildmere Phase 2 2016‐31 H‐2Lyman 3 2 12016‐33 Northern Oaks resubmittal SE 35 132217 SF‐Detached E‐1 Geneva 8 4 4 Northern Oaks resubmittal 2016‐33 M‐4Jackson Heights 4 2 2 Northern Oaks resubmittal 2016‐33 H‐4Oviedo 5 2 32016‐34 Klinger Property SW 94 633146 SF‐Detached E‐8 Wekiva 21 16 5 Klinger Property 2016‐34 M‐2Teague 118 3 Klinger Property 2016‐34 H‐2Lake Brantley 14 10 42016‐35 Brookmore Estates SE 54 51317 SF‐Detached E‐2 Evans 8 7 1 Brookmore Estates 2016‐35 M‐4Jackson Heights 4 4 0 Brookmore Estates 2016‐35 H‐4Oviedo 5 5 02016‐36 Sanctuary at Altamonte/Centerpointe SW 300 300065 MF E‐7 Altamonte 37 37 0 Sanctuary at Altamonte/Centerpointe 2016‐36 M‐2 Milwee 14 14 0 Sanctuary at Altamonte/Centerpointe 2016‐36 H‐2 Lyman 14 14 02017‐01 Oak Hollow Lane Subdivision SE 3 031SF‐Detached E‐2Evans 1 0 1Oak Hollow Lane Subdivision 2017‐01 M‐3 Tuskawilla 0 0 0 Oak Hollow Lane Subdivision 2017‐01 H‐3Lake Howell 0 0 02017‐02 Griffith Estates resubmitted SE 3 031SF‐Detached E‐1 Geneva 1 0 1 Griffith Estates resubmitted 2017‐02 M‐4 Chiles 0 0 0 Griffith Estates resubmitted 2017‐02 H‐4Oviedo 0 0 02017‐04 Oakmonte Reserve II (Belair Property) SW 41 41020 SF‐Detached E‐6 Longwood 9 9 0 Oakmonte Reserve II (Belair Property) 2017‐04 M‐1 Greenwood Lakes 5 5 0 Oakmonte Reserve II (Belair Property) 2017‐04 H‐2Lyman 6 6 02017‐05 Bay Meadows Farms at Longwood SW 72 72035 SF‐Detached E‐6 Longwood 16 16 0 Bay Meadows Farms at Longwood 2017‐05 M‐1 Greenwood Lakes 8 8 0 Bay Meadows Farms at Longwood 2017‐05 H‐2 Lyman 11 11 02017‐06 Lake Emma Sound NW 78 78037 SF‐Detached E‐9Region 217170Lake Emma Sound 2017‐06 M‐1 Millennium 9 9 0 Lake Emma Sound 2017‐06 H‐1Seminole 1111 02017‐09 Lake Mary Townhomes NW 104 010424 SF‐Attached E‐9Region 210010Lake Mary Townhomes 2017‐09 M‐1 Greenwood Lakes 6 0 6 Lake Mary Townhomes 2017‐09 H‐1Lake Mary 8 0 82017‐09 Lake Mary Townhomes (Expired) NW‐104 0‐104‐24 SF‐Attached E‐9Region 2‐10 0‐10 Lake Mary Townhomes 2017‐09 M‐1 Greenwood Lakes‐60‐6Lake Mary Townhomes 2017‐09 H‐1Lake Mary‐80‐82017‐11 Legacy Place Townhomes SW 64 46015 SF‐Attached E‐3 Sterling Park 6 0 6 Legacy Place Townhomes 2017‐11 M‐3South Seminole 4 1 3 Legacy Place Townhomes 2017‐11 H‐3Winter Springs 5 1 42017‐12 Marave Estates SE 4 042SF‐Detached E‐4Red Bug 1 0 1 Marave Estates 2017‐12 M‐3 Tuskawilla 0 0 0 Marave Estates 2017‐12 H‐3Lake Howell 1 0 12017‐13 Evergreen NW 95 653046 SF‐Detached E‐10 Region 3 21 16 5 Evergreen 2017‐13 M‐1 Millennium 11 8 3 Evergreen 2017‐13 H‐1Seminole 1410 42017‐14 Dike Road SE 3 031SF‐Detached E‐4Red Bug 1 0 1 Dike Road 2017‐14 M‐3 Tuskawilla 0 0 0 Dike Road 2017‐14 H‐3Lake Howell 0 0 02017‐16 Skyway Beardall Subdivision NE 70 70034 SF‐Detached E‐10 Region 316160Skyway Beardall Subdivision 2017‐16 M‐1Sanford 88 0 Skyway Beardall Subdivision 2017‐16 H‐1Seminole 1010 02017‐17 Legacy at Sunbranch SW 15 1418SF‐Detached E‐5Winter Springs 4 4 0 Legacy at Sunbranch 2017‐17 M‐2Milwee 22 0 Legacy at Sunbranch 2017‐17 H‐3Winter Springs 2 2 02017‐18 Morningstar Place SE 3 031SF‐Detached E‐3 Rainbow 1 0 1 Morningstar Place 2017‐18 M‐3 0 0 0 Morningstar Place 2017‐18 H‐3Lake Howell 0 0 02017‐19 Wexham Place SW 17 1708SF‐Detached E‐3 Sterling Park 4 4 0 Wexham Place 2017‐19 M‐3South Seminole 2 2 0 Wexham Place 2017‐19 H‐3Lake Howell 2 2 02017‐20 Cameron Heights Village BNE170178SF‐Detached E‐10 Region 3404Cameron Heights Addition 2017‐20 M‐1 Millennium 2 0 2 Cameron Heights Addition 2017‐20 H‐1Seminole 2 0 22017‐21Chinmaya Subdivision (expired)SE 10 0104SF‐Detached E‐3 Sterling Park 2 0 2 Chinmaya Subdivision 2017‐21 M‐3South Seminole 1 0 1 Chinmaya Subdivision 2017‐21 H‐3Lake Howell 1 0 12017‐21 Chinmaya Subdivision (expired) SE‐10 0‐10‐4SF‐Detached E‐3 Sterling Park‐20‐2 Chinmaya Subdivision2017‐21 M‐3South Seminole‐10‐1 Chinmaya Subdivision2017‐21 H‐3Lake Howell‐10‐12017‐22 Lake Monroe Apartments NE 280 280060 MF E‐9Region 134340Lake Monroe Apartments 2017‐22 M‐1 Markham Woods 13 13 0 Lake Monroe Apartments 2017‐22 H‐1Seminole 1313 02017‐23 Hawk's Crest (re eval 2017‐08) SW 707 566141281 SF‐Detached & Attached E‐4 Eastbrook 127 103 24 Hawk's Crest (re eval 2017‐08) 2017‐23 M‐3 Tuskawilla 69 55 14 Hawk's Crest (re eval 2017‐08) 2017‐23 H‐3Lake Howell 85 65 202017‐24 Old Lockwood Fawn Run Property SE 31 31016 SF‐Detached E‐2 Carillon 7 7 0 Old Lockwood Fawn Run Property 2017‐24 M‐4Jackson Heights 4 4 0 Old Lockwood Fawn Run Property 2017‐24 H‐4Hagerty 5 5 02017‐25 Estates at Wellington SE 24 12313 SF‐Detached E‐3 Rainbow 6 0 6 Estates at Wellington 2017‐25 M‐3 Tuskawilla 3 0 3 Estates at Wellington 2017‐25 H‐3Lake Howell 4 0 42017‐26 Terra Bona Estates NW 5 053SF‐Detached E‐9Region 1 1 0 1 Terra Bona Estates 2017‐26 M‐1 Markham Woods 1 0 1 Terra Bona Estates 2017‐26 H‐1Seminole 1 0 12017‐28 Spring Tree Village Phase 4SW4120219MF E‐4Red Bug 5 2 3 Spring Tree Village Phase 4 2017‐28 M‐3South Seminole 2 1 1 Spring Tree Village Phase 4 2017‐28 H‐3Lake Howell 2 1 12018‐03 Hideaway Cove SE 49 391023SF‐DetachedE‐2 Carillon 11 9 2 Hideaway Cove 2018‐03 M‐4 Chiles 5 4 1 Hideaway Cove 2018‐03 H‐4Hagerty 7 6 12018‐03 Hideaway Cove SE 43 43021SF‐AttachedE‐2 Carillon 10 10 0 Hideaway Cove 2018‐03 M‐4 Chiles 5 5 0 Hideaway Cove 2018‐03 H‐4Hagerty 6 6 02018‐04 Legacy Estates (East Lake Dr.) SE 16 1609SF‐Detached E‐3 Sterling Park 4 4 0 Legacy Estates (East Lake Dr.) 2018‐04 M‐3South Seminole 2 2 0 Legacy Estates (East Lake Dr.) 2018‐04 H‐3Lake Howell 3 3 02018‐05 The Towns at White Cedar NW 155 155036 SF‐Attached E‐9Region 115150The Towns at White Cedar 2018‐05 M‐1 Markham Woods 10 10 0 The Towns at White Cedar 2018‐05 H‐1Seminole 1111 02018‐08 Sand Lake Rd residential SW 13 0135SF‐Detached E‐8Wekiva 2 0 2Sand Lake Rd residential 2018‐08 M‐2Teague 10 1 Sand Lake Rd residential 2018‐08 H‐2Lake Brantley 2 0 22018‐11 Myrtle Townhomes SW 10 0103SF‐Attached E‐6 Longwood 1 0 1 Myrtle Townhomes 2018‐11 M‐2Milwee 10 1 Myrtle Townhomes 2018‐11 H‐3Winter Springs 1 0 12018‐15Beasley PSP (withdrawn)SE 8 083SF‐Detached E‐2Evans 1 0 1Beasley PSP (withdrawn)2018‐15 M‐4Jackson Heights 1 0 1Beasley PSP (withdrawn)2018‐15 H‐4Hagerty 1 0 12018‐15 Beasley PSP (withdrawn) SE‐80‐8‐3SF‐Detached E‐2Evans‐10‐1 Beasley PSP (withdrawn) 2018‐15 M‐4Jackson Heights‐10‐1 Beasley PSP (withdrawn) 2018‐15 H‐4Hagerty‐10‐12018‐16Chateaux at Markham (no activity)NW 10 0104SF‐Detached E‐9Region 1202Chateaux at Markham (no activity)2018‐16 M‐1 Markham Woods 1 0 1Chateaux at Markham (no activity)2018‐16 H‐1Seminole 1 0 12018‐17 Winter Springs Townhomes SE 114 011426 SF‐Attached E‐3Layer 12 0 12Winter Springs Townhomes 2018‐17 M‐3 Indian Trails 6 0 6 Winter Springs Townhomes 2018‐17 H‐3Winter Springs 8 0 82018‐18 Riverside Oaks NE 130 2410653 SF‐Detached E‐10 Region 322418Riverside Oaks 2018‐18 M‐1 Millennium 12 2 10 Riverside Oaks 2018‐18 H‐1Seminole 19 4 152018‐19 Cameron Heights Village "C" NE 76 07631 SF‐Detached E‐10 Region 313013Cameron Heights Village "C" 2018‐19 M‐1 Millennium 7 0 7 Cameron Heights Village "C" 2018‐19 H‐1Seminole 11 0 112018‐20 Concord Townhomes SW 20 2008SF‐Attached E‐7 Altamonte 3 3 0 Concord Townhomes 2018‐20 M‐2Milwee 22 0 Concord Townhomes 2018‐20 H‐2Lyman 3 3 02018‐22 Broadstone Forest NW 260 12014083 MF E‐9Region 1432023Broadstone Forest 2018‐22 M‐1 Sanford 17 7 10 Broadstone Forest 2018‐22 H‐1Seminole 2311 122018‐25 Belle Grace East SW 4 402SF‐Detached E‐10 Region 3 1 1 0 Belle Grace East 2018‐25 M‐1 Millennium 0 0 0 Belle Grace East 2018‐25 H‐1Seminole 1 1 02018‐26 Florida Extruders Property NE 176 5911752 SF‐Detached & Attached E‐10 Region 3231112Florida Extruders Property 2018‐26 M‐1 Millennium 12 6 6 Florida Extruders Property 2018‐26 H‐1Seminole 17 9 82018‐27 Alta Longwood SW 263 263082 MF E‐6 Longwood 43 43 0 Alta Longwood 2018‐27 M‐1 Greenwood Lakes 17 17 0 Alta Longwood 2018‐27 H‐2 Lyman 22 22 02018‐28 Preserve at Maitland Townhomes SW 10 822SF‐Attached E‐4 English Estates 1 1 0 Lake Howell Townhomes 2018‐28 M‐3South Seminole 0 0 0 Lake Howell Townhomes 2018‐28 H‐3Lake Howell 1 1 02018‐29 The Dwell at Lake Mary NW 272 027287 MF E‐6Lake Mary 45 0 45 The Dwell at Lake Mary 2018‐29 M‐1 Millennium 18 0 18 The Dwell at Lake Mary 2018‐29 H‐1Seminole 24 0 242018‐30 Estuary at St Johns (Gateway) NW 65 521326 SF‐Detached E‐9Region 1119 2Estuary at St Johns (Gateway) 2018‐30 M‐1Sanford 65 1 Estuary at St Johns (Gateway) 2018‐30 H‐1Seminole 9 7 22018‐31 Tesoro Townhomes NW 53 05313 SF‐Attached E‐9Region 1606Tesoro Townhomes 2018‐31 M‐1Sanford 30 3 Tesoro Townhomes 2018‐31 H‐1Seminole 4 0 42018‐32 Dwell at Oviedo reeval 2 SE 300 030096 MF E‐1Lawton 50 0 50Dwell at Oviedo reeval 2 2018‐32 M‐4Jackson Heights 20 0 20 Dwell at Oviedo reeval 2 2018‐32 H‐4Oviedo 26 0 262019‐01 Integra Crossings NW 350 3500112 MF E‐9Region 158580Integra Crossings 2019‐01 M‐1 Sanford 23 23 0 Integra Crossings 2019‐01 H‐1Seminole 3131 02019‐02 Kiwi at Fern Lake SW 75 07519 MF E‐6 Longwood 10 0 10 Kiwi at Fern Lake 2019‐02 M‐2 Milwee 4 0 4 Kiwi at Fern Lake 2019‐02 H‐2Lyman 5 0 52019‐03 Allure on the Parkway/Encore Place NW 290 328784 MF E‐9Region 1 44 9 35 Allure on the Parkway/Encore Place 2019‐03 M‐1 Sanford 17 5 12 Allure on the Parkway/Encore Place 2019‐03 H‐1Seminole 23 6 172019‐04 East Park (FKA Citrus Ridge) SW 17 1707SF‐Detached E‐4 Eastbrook 3 3 0 East Park (FKA Citrus Ridge) 2019‐04 M‐3 Tuskawilla 2 2 0 East Park (FKA Citrus Ridge) 2019‐04 H‐3Lake Howell 2 2 02019‐06 Jefferson at Lake Howell SW 384 3786121 MF E‐3 Sterling Park 63 62 1 Jefferson at Lake Howell 2019‐06 M‐3South Seminole 25 25 0 Jefferson at Lake Howell 2019‐06 H‐3Lake Howell 33 33 02019‐07 Wyndham Preserve / Pine Way NE 34 34014 SF‐Detached E‐10 Region 3 6 6 0 Wyndham Preserve / Pine Way 2019‐07 M‐1Sanford 33 0 Wyndham Preserve / Pine Way 2019‐07 H‐1Seminole 5 5 02019‐08 Celery Oaks NE 112 011246 SF‐Detached E‐10 Region 319019Celery Oaks 2019‐08 M‐1 Markham Woods 11 0 11 Celery Oaks 2019‐08 H‐1Seminole 16 0 162019‐09 Warley Park NE 81 81023 MF E‐10 Region 312120Warley Park 2019‐09 M‐1Sanford 55 0 Warley Park 2019‐09 H‐1Seminole 6 6 02019‐10 Modern Jamestown Reserve SE 10 0104SF‐Detached E‐2Evans 2 0 2Modern Jamestown Reserve 2019‐10 M‐3 Tuskawilla 1 0 1 Modern Jamestown Reserve 2019‐10 H‐3Lake Howell 1 0 1
1869
SCALD NUM Name Quadrant UnitsCOs as of 10/15/2021Remaining UnitsTOTAL STATIONS RESERVED Type CSA ELM ELM SCHOOL SGR CALC SGR ACTRESERVED STATIONS REMAINING Name SCALD NUM CSA MID MID_SCHOOLSGR CALC SGR ACTRESERVED STATIONS REMAINING Name SCALD NUM CSA HIGH HIGH SCHOOLSGR CALCSGR ACTRESERVED STATIONS REMAINING2019‐12 Fountain Park PD NW 106 01060SF‐Attached E‐9Region 2 0 0 0 Fountain Park PD 2019‐12 M‐1 Millennium 0 0 0 Fountain Park PD 2019‐12 H‐1Seminole 0 0 02019‐13 Longwood TOD Townhomes SW 52 05213 SF‐Attached E‐6 Longwood 6 0 6 Longwood TOD Townhomes 2019‐13 M‐2 Milwee 3 0 3 Longwood TOD Townhomes 2019‐13 H‐3Winter Springs 4 0 42019‐14 Parkview at Lake Mary (FKA New Century) NW 300 50250109 MF E‐9Region 2562531Parkview at Lake Mary (FKA New Century) 2019‐14 M‐1 Millennium 23 12 11 Parkview at Lake Mary (FKA New Century) 2019‐14 H‐1Seminole 3015 152019‐17 Brookmore Estates Phase 3SE121205SF‐Detached E‐2 Evans 2 2 0 Brookmore Estates Phase 3 2019‐17 M‐4Jackson Heights 1 1 0 Brookmore Estates Phase 3 2019‐17 H‐4Oviedo 2 2 02019‐18 Kentucky Square NE 116 011648 SF‐Detached E‐10 Region 3 20 0 20 Kentucky Square 2019‐18 M‐1Sanford 110 11 Kentucky Square 2019‐18 H‐1Seminole 17 0 172019‐18 Kentucky Square (Expired) NE‐116 0‐116‐48 SF‐Detached E‐10 Region 3‐20 0‐20 Kentucky Square 2019‐18 M‐1Sanford‐11 0‐11 Kentucky Square 2019‐18 H‐1Seminole‐17 0‐172019‐20 Traditions at White Cedar NW 48 341420 SF‐Detached E‐9Region 1 8 6 2 Traditions at White Cedar 2019‐20 M‐1 Markham Woods 5 4 1 Traditions at White Cedar 2019‐20 H‐1Seminole 7 5 22019‐21 Via Foresta NW 8 083SF‐Detached E‐9Region 1101Via Foresta 2019‐21 M‐1Sanford 10 1 Via Foresta 2019‐21 H‐1Seminole 1 0 12019‐22 Celery Pointe NE 100 010041 SF‐Detached E‐10 Region 317017Celery Point 2019‐22 M‐1 Millennium 10 0 10 Celery Point 2019‐22 H‐1Seminole 14 0 142019‐23 Oxford Place Phase 1 SW 245 024577 MF E‐7 Altamonte 40 0 40 Oxford Place 2019‐23 M‐3South Seminole 16 0 16 Oxford Place Apts Phase 1 2019‐23 H‐3Lake Howell 21 0 212019‐24 Crestwood Estates NW 20 10108SF‐Detached E‐6 Heathrow 3 1 2 Crestwood Estates 2019‐24 M‐1 Markham Woods 2 1 1 Crestwood Estates 2019‐24 H‐1Seminole 3 2 12019‐25 Chapman Pines SE 37 261115 SF‐Detached E‐2 Evans 6 4 2 Chapman Pines 2019‐25 M‐4Jackson Heights 4 3 1 Chapman Pines 2019‐25 H‐4Oviedo 5 3 22019‐26 Hideaway Cove Phs 3SE3913814 SF‐Detached E‐2 Carillon 6 0 6 Hideaway Cove Phs 3 2019‐26 M‐4 Chiles 3 0 3 Hideaway Cove Phs 3 2019‐26 H‐4Hagerty 5 0 52019‐27 Grove Ave Estates SE 9 094SF‐Detached E‐4 Eastbrook 2 0 2 Grove Ave Estates 2019‐27 M‐3 Tuskawilla 1 0 1 Grove Ave Estates 2019‐27 H‐3Lake Howell 1 0 12019‐28 Vintage North Apts NW 310 031092 MF E‐9Region 148048Vintage North Apts 2019‐28 M‐1Sanford 190 19 Vintage North Apts 2019‐28 H‐1Seminole 25 0 252019‐29 Red Ember Estates SE 76 07631 SF‐Detached E‐2 Carillon 13 0 13 Red Ember Estates ADJACENT M‐4 2019‐29 M‐3 Tuskawilla 7 0 7 Red Ember Estates 2019‐29 H‐4Hagerty 11 0 112019‐30 Cameron Heights Village C‐1 (SCALD RENEWED 4/22/2021 ‐ rlb) NE 109 01090SF‐Detached E‐10 Region 3000Cameron Heights C‐1 2019‐30 M‐1 Millennium 0 0 0 Cameron Heights C‐1 2019‐30 H‐1Seminole 0 0 02019‐31 Sylvestri Estates NE 430 0430175 SF‐Detached E‐10 Region 373073Sylvestri Estates 2019‐31 M‐1 Sanford 41 0 41 Sylvestri Estates 2019‐31 H‐1Seminole 61 0 612019‐32 Geneva Ski Lake SE 12 0125SF‐Detached E‐1 Geneva 2 0 2 Geneva Ski Lake ADJACENT M‐4 2019‐32 M‐3 Tuskawilla 1 0 1 Geneva Ski Lake 2019‐32 H‐4Oviedo 2 0 22019‐33 Enaclave at Alafaya SE 84 84027 SF‐Detached E‐2 Carillon 14 14 0 Enclave at Alafaya ADJACENT M‐4 2019‐33 M‐3 Tuskawilla 6 6 0 Enclave at Alafaya 2019‐33 H‐4Hagerty 7 7 02020‐02 Savta Reserve NW 14 0145SF‐Detached E‐9Region 2202Savta Reserve 2020‐02 M‐1 Markham Woods 1 0 1 Savta Reserve 2020‐02 H‐1Seminole 2 0 22020‐04 Reserve at Hillview SW 41 04117 SF‐Detached E‐8Spring Lake 7 0 7 Reserve at Hillview 2020‐04 M‐2Teague 40 4 Reserve at Hillview 2020‐04 H‐2Lake Brantley 6 0 62020‐05 Celery Cove NE 37 34315 SF‐Detached E‐10 Region 3651Celery Cove 2020‐05 M‐1 Millennium 4 4 0 Celery Cove 2020‐05 H‐1Seminole 5 5 02020‐06 NOMA PD SE 269 026984 MF E‐3 Rainbow 44 0 44 NOMA PD 2020‐06 M‐3 Tuskawilla 17 0 17 NOMA PD 2020‐06 H‐3Lake Howell 23 0 232020‐08 River Run Preserve NE 94 19334 SF‐Detached E‐10 Region 316016River Run Preserve 2020‐08 M‐1Sanford 90 9 River Run Preserve 2020‐08 H‐1Seminole 9 0 92020‐09 Oxford Place Phase 2 SW 330 0330102 MF E‐4 English Estates 53 0 53 Oxford Place Phase 2 2020‐09 M‐3South Seminole 21 0 21 Oxford Place Phase 2 2020‐09 H‐3Lake Howell 28 0 282020‐10 Oxford Place Phase 3 SW 200 020062 MF E‐4 English Estates 32 0 32 Oxford Place Phase 3 2020‐10 M‐3South Seminole 13 0 13 Oxford Place Phase 3 2020‐10 H‐3Lake Howell 17 0 172020‐14 Alta Cypress SW 342 0342107 MF E‐7 Altamonte 59 0 59 Alta Cypress 2020‐14 M‐2 Milwee 24 0 24 Alta Cypress 2020‐14 H‐2Lyman 24 0 242020‐16 Pine Aveneue Property SE 23 0239SF‐Detached E‐1LAWTON40 4Pine Aveneue Property ADJACENT M‐4 2020‐16 M‐3 Indian Trails 2 0 2 Pine Aveneue Property 2020‐16 H‐4Oviedo 3 0 32020-17 Rodriquez PropertySE2020SF Detached E‐1WALKER 000Rodriquez Property2020-17M‐4CHILES 000Rodriquez Property2020-17H‐4HAGERTY 0002020-18 CORONA LOT SPLITSW1010MOBILE HOME E‐8SPRING LAKE 000CORONA LOT SPLIT 2020-18M‐2TEAGUE 000CORONA LOT SPLIT 2020-18H‐2Lake Brantley 0002020-18 CORONA LOT SPLIT (No Impact)SW‐10‐10MOBILE HOME E‐8SPRING LAKE 000CORONA LOT SPLIT 2020-18M‐2TEAGUE 000CORONA LOT SPLIT 2020-18H‐2Lake Brantley 0002020-19 SMITH PARCELSE0000LOT SPLITE‐3RAINBOW 000SMITH PARCEL 2020-19M‐3 TUSKAWILLA 000SMITH PARCEL 2020-19H‐3LAKE HOWELL 0002020-20 WEST TOWN PARKWAYSW534 0534120SF‐Attached E‐8SPRING LAKE 65065WEST TOWN PARKWAY2020-20M‐2TEAGUE 23023WEST TOWN PARKWAY2020-20H‐2Lake Brantley 320322020-20 WEST TOWN PARKWAYSW‐534 0‐534‐120SF‐Attached E‐8SPRING LAKE‐650‐65WEST TOWN PARKWAY2020-20M‐2TEAGUE‐230‐23WEST TOWN PARKWAY2020-20H‐2Lake Brantley‐320‐322020-20 West Town Parkway (Amended)SW539 0539190MF E‐8SPRING LAKE 98098West Town Parkway (Amended) 2020-20 M‐2TEAGUE 40040West Town Parkway (Amended) 2020-20 H‐2Lake Brantley 520522020-21 SKOROKOUMOV PARCELSW1010SF Detached E‐8FOREST CITY 000SKOROKOUMOV PARCEL 2020-21M‐2TEAGUE 000SKOROKOUMOV PARCEL 2020-21H‐2Lake Brantley 0002020-22 WILLIAMS LOT SPLITNW1010SF Detached E‐6LAKE MARY 000WILLIAMS LOT SPLIT 2020-22M‐1 Greenwood Lakes 000WILLIAMS LOT SPLIT 2020-22H‐1LAKE MARY 0002020-23 ADDISON LONGWOOD APARTMENTSSW277 027789SF‐Attached E‐6 LONGWOOD 46046ADDISON LONGWOOD APARTMENTS 2020-23M‐2MILWEE 19019ADDISON LONGWOOD APARTMENTS 2020-23H‐2LYMAN 240242020-24 DORNA LOT SPLITSE1010SF Detached E‐1 GENEVA 000DORNA LOT SPLIT 2020-24M‐4CHILES 000DORNA LOT SPLIT 2020-24H‐4HAGERTY 0002020-24 DORNA LOT SPLIT (No Impact)SE‐10‐10SF Detached E‐1 GENEVA 000DORNA LOT SPLIT 2020-24M‐4CHILES 000DORNA LOT SPLIT 2020-24H‐4HAGERTY 0002020-25 RODRIQUEZ LOT SPLITSE1010SF Detached E‐1 GENEVA 000RODRIQUEZ LOT SPLIT 2020-25M‐4CHILES 000RODRIQUEZ LOT SPLIT 2020-25H‐4HAGERTY 0002020-25 RODRIQUEZ LOT SPLIT (No Impact)SE‐10‐10SF Detached E‐1 GENEVA 000RODRIQUEZ LOT SPLIT 2020-25M‐4CHILES 000RODRIQUEZ LOT SPLIT 2020-25H‐4HAGERTY 0002020-26 RED EMBER ESTATESSE190198SF Detached E‐2 Carillon 303RED EMBER ESTATES 2020-26M‐4Jackson Heights 202RED EMBER ESTATES 2020-26H‐4Hagerty 3032020-27 Iconn CommonsSW260266SF Attached E‐5 Casselberry 303Iconn Commons 2020-27M‐3South Seminole 101Iconn Commons 2020-27H‐3Lake Howell 2022020-28 Northridge ReserveSW6063SF Detached E‐7 Woodlands 101Northridge Reserve 2020-28M‐2Rock Lake 101Northridge Reserve 2020-28H‐1Lake Mary 1012020-29 Park Square HomesSE6306315SF Attached E‐2Partin 707Park Square Homes 2020-29M‐4Jackson Heights 303Park Square Homes 2020-29H‐4Hagerty 5052020-30 Lake Shore at Center PointeSW1319 01319376MF E‐7 Altamonte 1980 198Lake Shore at Center Pointe 2020-30M‐2 Milwee 77077Lake Shore at Center Pointe 2020-30H‐2 Lyman 1010 1012021-01 Lake Monroe Shores Townhomes NE150 015035SF Attached E‐9Region 116016Lake Monroe Shores Townhomes 2021-01M‐1 Markham Woods 808Lake Monroe Shores Townhomes 2021-01H‐1Seminole 110112021-02 First Street Station NE32 0327SF Attached E‐10 Region 3303First Street Station 2021-02M‐1 Markham Woods 202First Street Station 2021-02H‐1Seminole 2022021-03 Hickory Grove (The Gathering) SE133 013331SF Attached E‐3Layer 14014Hickory Grove (The Gathering) 2021-03M‐3 Indian Trails 707Hickory Grove (The Gathering) 2021-03H‐3Winter Springs 100102021-04 Sanford Station Apartments NW294 029495MF E‐9Region 149049Sanford Station Apartments 2021-04M‐1 Markham Woods 20020Sanford Station Apartments 2021-04H‐1Seminole 260262021-05 Broadway Townhomes SE20 0204SF Attached E‐1Lawton 202Broadway Townhomes 2021-05M‐4Jackson Heights 101Broadway Townhomes 2021-05H‐4Oviedo 1012021-06 Skyway Townhomes NE85 08519SF‐Attached E‐10 Region 3909Skyway Townhomes 2021-06M‐1Sanford 404Skyway Townhomes 2021-06H‐1Seminole 6062021-07 Slovak Garden Townhomes SW138 013832SF Attached E‐4 Eastbrook 15015Slovak Garden Townhomes 2021-07M‐3 Tuskawilla 707Slovak Garden Townhomes 2021-07H‐3Lake Howell 100102021-08 Hidden Oaks SW105 010543SF Detached E‐10 Region 318018Hidden Oaks 2021-08M‐1 Millennium 10010Hidden Oaks 2021-08h‐1Seminole 150152021-09 Marquis Townhomes SW26 0266SF Attached E‐5 Casselberry 303Marquis Townhomes 2021-09M‐3South Seminole 101Marquis Townhomes 2021-09H‐3Lake Howell 2022021-10 Novel Parkway Apartments NW325 032593MF E‐9Region 149049Novel Parkway Apartments 2021-10M‐1Sanford 19019Novel Parkway Apartments 2021-10H‐1Seminole 250252021-11 Myrtle Estates Homes NE36 03614SF Detached E‐10 Region 3606Myrtle Estates Homes 2021-11M‐1 Millennium 303Myrtle Estates Homes 2021-11H‐1Seminole 5052021-12 Bartam's Landing at St Johns (fka Gateway)NW31 03112SF Detached E‐9Region 1505Bartam's Landing at St Johns (fka Gateway) 2021-12M‐1Sanford 303Bartam's Landing at St Johns (fka Gateway) 2021-12H‐1Seminole 4042021-13 City Place (Oviedo) SE25 0256SF Attached E‐2 Stenstrom 303City Place (Oviedo) 2021-13M‐4Jackson Heights 101City Place (Oviedo) 2021-13H‐4Oviedo 2022021-13 City Place (Oviedo) SE‐25 0‐25‐6SF Attached E‐2 Stenstrom‐30‐3City Place (Oviedo) 2021-13M‐4Jackson Heights‐10‐1City Place (Oviedo) 2021-13H‐4Oviedo‐20‐22021-13 City Place (Oviedo) AMENDED SE50 05011Multi‐Family E‐2 Stenstrom 606City Place (Oviedo) AMENDED 2021-13M‐4Jackson Heights 202City Place (Oviedo) AMENDED 2021-13H‐4Oviedo 3032021-14Altamonte Springs Apartment SW346 0346110MF E‐7Altamonte 57057Altamonte Springs Apartment 2021-14M‐2 Milwee 23023Altamonte Springs Apartment 2021-14H‐2Lyman 300302021-15 Towns at Tuskaloma Commons SE111 011126SF Attached E‐4Red Bug 12012Towns at Tuskaloma Commons 2021-15M‐3 Tuskawilla 606Towns at Tuskaloma Commons 2021-15H‐3Lake Howell 8082021-16 The Adel at Lake Jesup SE14 0145SF Detached E‐3Layer 202The Adel at Lake Jesup 2021-16M‐3 Indian Trails 101The Adel at Lake Jesup 2021-16H‐3Winter Springs 2022021-17 Ryder Reserve NE5052SF‐Detached & AttachedE‐1 Geneva 101Ryder Reserve 2021-17M‐4 Chiles 000Ryder Reserve 2021-17H‐4Oviedo 1012021-18 Seminole St Johns NW352 0352117 MFE‐9Region 160060Seminole St Johns 2021-18M‐1 Markham Woods 25025Seminole St Johns 2021-18H‐1Seminole 320322021‐19(2019‐30)Cameron Heights Village C‐1 (SCALD RENEWED 4/22/2021 ‐ rlb) NE 109 010945 SF‐Detached E‐10 Region 319019Cameron Heights C‐12021‐19(2019‐30)M‐1 Millennium 10 0 10 Cameron Heights C‐12021‐19(2019‐30)H‐1Seminole 16 0 162021-20 The HartleySW264 026444 MFE‐7Altamonte 4444The Hartley2021-20M‐2 Milwee 1818The Hartley2021-20H‐2Lyman 23232021‐21(2019‐12)Fountain Park PD NW 106 010611 SF‐Attached E‐9Region 2 11 0 11 Fountain Park PD2021‐21(2019‐12)M‐1 Millennium 5 0 5 Fountain Park PD2021‐21(2019‐12)H‐1Seminole 8 0 82021‐22Sylvan Estates (fka Lake Sylvan Oaks, Phase 3) NW 12 0122SF‐Detached E‐9Region 1202Sylvan Estates (fka Lake Sylvan Oaks, Phase 3)2021‐22M‐1 Markham Woods 1 0 1 Sylvan Estates (fka Lake Sylvan Oaks, Phase 3)2021‐22H‐1Seminole 2 0 22021-23 The Cove at Sanford Farms NW30 03012SF‐Detached E‐9Region 1505The Cove at Sanford Farms 2021-23M‐1Sanford 303The Cove at Sanford Farms 2021-23H‐1Seminole 4042021-24 Sanford Courtyard NE10 0102MF E‐9Region 3101Sanford Courtyard 2021-24M‐1 Markham Woods 000Sanford Courtyard 2021-24H‐1Seminole 1012021-25 Mayfair Cove NW11 0115SF Detached E‐9Region 2202Mayfair Cove 2021-25M‐1Sanford 101Mayfair Cove 2021-25H‐1Seminole 2022021-26 Stella Cove NE8083SF Detached E‐9Region 2101Stella Cove 2021-26M‐1Sanford 101Stella Cove 2021-26H‐1Seminole 1012021-27 Solera Altamonte SW268 026886MF E‐7Altamonte 44044Solera Altamonte 2021-27M‐2 Milwee 18018Solera Altamonte 2021-27H‐2Lyman 230232021-28 Celery Avenue Subdivision NE93 09338SF Detached E‐10 Region 316016Celery Avenue Subdivision 2021-28M‐1 Millennium 909Celery Avenue Subdivision 2021-28H‐1Seminole 130132021-29 Loma Vista PUD (Exempt) SE30 0301MF E‐2Evans 404Loma Vista PUD (Exempt) 2021-29M‐3 Tuskawilla 202Loma Vista PUD (Exempt) 2021-29H‐3Lake Howell 2022021-30 Kentucky Square NE149 014961SF Detached E‐10 Region 325025Kentucky Square 2021-30M‐1Sanford 14014Kentucky Square 2021-30H‐1Seminole 210212021-31 San Leon Mixed Use Building NE10 10102MF E‐10 Region 3110San Leon Mixed Use Building 2021-31M‐1 Markham Woods 000San Leon Mixed Use Building 2021-31H‐1Seminole 11017231 5427 11814 5625 2755 9381817902 4598101165 5701092Leave this row blank and add rows above1870
SCALD NUM Name Quadrant UnitsCOs as of 10/15/2021Remaining UnitsTOTAL STATIONS RESERVED Type CSA ELM ELM SCHOOL SGR CALC SGR ACTRESERVED STATIONS REMAINING Name SCALD NUM CSA MID MID_SCHOOLSGR CALC SGR ACTRESERVED STATIONS REMAINING Name SCALD NUM CSA HIGH HIGH SCHOOLSGR CALCSGR ACTRESERVED STATIONS REMAININGCSATotal StationsCSATotal StationsCSATotal StationsE-1 66E‐1 Geneva/Walker 9M-1 377M‐1 Chiles 4H-1 521H‐1Hagerty 27E-2 62E‐2Lawton/Stenstrom 63M-2 236M‐2Jackson Heights 39H-2 295H‐2Oviedo 49E-3 137E‐3 Carillion/Partin 31M-3 154M‐3 Tuskawilla 59H-3 200H‐3Winter Springs 59E-4 143E‐4 Evans/Rainbow 76M-4 43M‐4 Indian Trails 37H-4 76H‐4Lake Howell 141E-5 7E‐5East Brook/Red Bug 58M‐5South Seminole 58H‐5 Lyman 231E-6 117E‐6 Casselberry/Sterling 15M‐6 Milwee 187H‐6Lake Brantley 64E-7 443E‐777M‐7Teague 48H‐7Lake Mary 8E-8 112E‐885M‐8Rock Lake 1H‐8 Seminole 513E-9 362E‐91M‐9 Greenwood Lakes 41092E-10 368E‐10 65M‐10 Millennium 151Totals1817E‐11 547810M‐11 Sanford 1451092E‐12 0M‐12 Markham Woods 77Altamonte 442 E‐13 7 Chiles (New) Middle 4810Hagerty High 27Bear Lake 0 E‐14 53 Greenwood Lakes Middle 4Lake Brantley High 64Bentley 0 E‐15 47 Indian Trails Middle 37Lake Howell High 141Carillon 24 E‐16 314 Jackson Heights Middle 39Lake Mary High 8Casselberry 6 E‐17 369 Markham Woods Middle 77Lyman High 231Crystal Lake 01817Millennium Middle (New) 151Oviedo High 49Eastbrook 41Milwee Middle 187Seminole High 513English Estates 85Rock Lake Middle 1Winter Springs High 59Evans 25Sanford Middle 145 1971092Forest City 0South Seminole Middle 58 173Geneva 9Teague Middle 48 35Goldsboro 0Tuskawilla Middle 59 94Hamilton 0810Heathrow 2Highlands 0Idyllwilde 0Keeth 0 NW 36 24%Lake Mary 51 NE 24 16%Lake Orienta 0 SW 40 27%Lawton 57 SE 48 32%Layer 77 148Longwood 64Midway 0Partin 7Pine Crest 0Rainbow 51Red Bug 17Region 1 314Region 247Region 3 369Sabal Point 0Spring Lake 105Stenstrom 6Sterling Park 9Walker 0Wekiva 7Wicklow 0Wilson 0Winter Springs 1Woodlands 11817Hamilton/Midway/Pinecr (R3)STUDENT RESERVATIONS PER NEW CSA LISTINGLongwood/WoodlandsAltamonte/Spring LakeBear Lake/Forest CitySabal Pt/WekivaHeathrow/Lake MaryKeeth/LayerEnglish E/Lake OrientaHighlands/Winter SprSTUDENT RESERVATIONS PER NEW CSA LISTINGSTUDENT RESERVATIONS PER NEW CSA LISTINGCrystal Lake/Wicklow (R2)Bentley/Idyllwilde/Wilson (R1)1871