HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022 01 31 City Commission Special Meeting Minutes CITY COMMISSION
' ,T59 SPECIAL MEETING
ts
*' MINUTES
MONDAY, JANUARY 31, 2022 AT 6:30 PM
CITY HALL- COMMISSION CHAMBERS
1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434, WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Kevin McCann called the Special Meeting of Monday, January 31, 2022 of the
City Commission to order at 6:33 p.m. in the Commission Chambers of the Municipal
Building (City Hall, 1126 East State Road 434, Winter Springs, Florida 32708).
Roll Call:
Mayor Kevin McCann, present
Deputy Mayor Kevin Cannon, present
Commissioner Matt Benton, present
Commissioner Ted Johnson, present
Commissioner TiAnna Hale, present
Commissioner Rob Elliott, present
City Manager Shawn Boyle, present
City Attorney Anthony A. Garganese, present
City Clerk Christian Gowan, present
*AGENDA NOTE* A FULL TRANSCRIPT OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS ATTACHED TO
THE END OF THESE MINUTES.
Commissioner Elliott provided the Invocation followed by the Pledge of Allegiance.
No changes were made to the agenda.
Mayor McCann noted the same rules of procedure as were discussed at the previous
meeting regarding this topic (September 20, 2021) would be in place.
AWARDS AND PRESENTATIONS
100.) Not Used
INFORMATIONAL AGENDA
200.) Not Used
PUBLIC INPUT
Mayor McCann opened Public Input
No one spoke
Mayor McCann closed Public Input
CONSENT AGENDA
300.) Not Used
PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA
400.) Not Used
REGULAR AGENDA
500) Pursuant to Resolution No. 2021-09 and Section 4.11 of the City Charter, City
Commission Investigation Proceeding Related to the City's Existing
Consumptive Use Permits Issued by St. Johns River Water Management
District and the Multi-Phase Expansion of the City's Reclaimed
Augmentation Plant at Lake Jesup and Related Distribution System.
Mr. Frank Hamner, Esquire was present representing the following subpoenaed
individual:
• Mr. David Gierach, President, CPH Engineering
Mr. Gierach was sworn in by the City Clerk and provided testimony to the
Commission.
Discussion followed on next steps and Attorney Garganese agreed to continue to
communicate with CPH's representatives to try and set up the appearance, in person
or via telephone, of Mr. Terry Zaudtke. The Commission agreed to give Attorney
Garganese thirty (30) days and make a decision on closing the investigation at the
February 28, 2022 City Commission meeting.
PUBLIC INPUT
Mayor McCann opened Public Input
Mr. Art Gallo, 799 Nandina Terrace, Winter Springs noted he thought it was time to
end the investigation and move forward.
Ms. Sheila Benton, 474 Cedarwood Court, Winter Springs encouraged the
Commission to review Comprehensive Plan requirements, specifically in the
Conservation Element.
Mayor McCann closed Public Input
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor McCann adjourned the meeting at 9:06 PM.
PES7�,�c
ULLYSUBMITTEQ;
CHRISTIAN GOWAN
CITY CLERK
APPROVED: ,,g
�ikT Fig
MAYOR KE IN MCCANN 3 q4
►► . 4
NOTE: These Minutes were approved at the June 27, 2022 City Commission Regular Meeting.
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
CITY COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING
(Corrected Transcript . )
Monday, January 31st, 2022
6 : 30 p .m. to 8 : 58 p .m.
City Hall Commission Chambers
1126 East State Road 434
Winter Springs, Florida 32807
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 INDEX
2
AGENDA ITEM PAGE
3
4 Regular Agenda
5 500 . Pursuant to Resolution No . 2021-09 and section 4 . 11 of
the City Charter, City Commission Investigation
6 proceeding Related to the City ' s existing Consumptive
Use Permits Issued by the St . John ' s River Water
7 Management District and the multi-phase expansion of the
City ' s Reclaimed Augmentation Plant at Lake Jesup and
8 Related Distribution System.
9
Public input 108
10
11 Adjournment 115
12
Certificate of Reporter 116
13 Certificate of Correction 117
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
U. S . Legal Support www.uslegalsupport . com 2
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 P R O C E E D I N G S
2 - - - - - - -
3 MR . MCCANN: And good evening, everyone . I would
4 like to call the January 31st, 2022 , Special Meeting in
5 the City of Winter Springs City Commission to order.
6 And Christian can you call the roll , please .
7 MR . GOWAN: Kevin McCann .
8 MR . MCCANN: Present .
9 MR . GOWAN: Deputy Kevin Cannon.
10 MR . CANNON: Present .
11 MR . GOWAN: Commissioner Matt Benton
12 MR . BENTON: Here .
13 MR . GOWAN: Commissioner Ted Johnson .
14 MR . JOHNSON: Here .
15 MR . GOWAN: Commissioner Tiana Hale .
16 MS . HALE : Here .
17 MR GOWAN: Commissioner Rob Elliott .
18 MR . Elliott : Here .
19 MR . GOWAN: City Manager, Shawn Boyle .
20 MR . BOYLE : Here .
21 MR . GOWAN: Thank you. City Attorney Anthony,
22 Garganese .
23 MR . GARGANESE : Here .
24 MR . GOWAN: For the record we do have a court
25 reporter, ordered by the City, retained just like we did
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 3
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 for the last special meeting, just for the record, thank
2 you.
3 MR . MCCANN: And Commissioner Elliott , if you would
4 not mind doing the invocation.
5 MR . ELLIOT : Sure . Please, bow our heads in
6 prayer . Lord, we gather again to do the People ' s
7 business remembering that we are your people . Please,
8 give us insight, understanding and enlightenment in
9 these proceedings here this evening. I ask your
10 presence be here in this room to keep our conversations
11 civil and professional , remembering to reflect you,
12 Lord, in all that we say and do . Amen .
13 MR . MCCANN: And now the Pledge .
14 (Pledge of Allegiance . )
15 MR . MCCANN: Okay. So - - bare with me for a
16 second. Okay. We have no more awards or presentations
17 or informational agenda . We will jump straight to
18 public input , during this session. We do believe that
19 if time allows out before and after, it is traditional ,
20 I do it after every commission meeting . And so at this
21 time if there is anyone that wishes to speak during
22 public input on an Agenda item subject matter, will be
23 allowed to fill out a blue public input form. And
24 individual will be limited to comments of three minutes
25 and representatives of groups or homeowner ' s
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 4
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 associations shall limit their comments to five minutes,
2 until otherwise determined by the city commission. I
3 would like to remind you of no foul language to speak to
4 the entire dais and not to any individual member .
5 Having said that would anyone like to have this first
6 opportunity to make any comments at the dais . Seeing
7 none . We ' ll move right on to the single item on the
8 Agenda . This is a special meeting of the City
9 Commission which is being helped to conduct the one
10 specific item of business on July 12th, 2021 .
11 The City Commission adapted resolution 2021-09
12 invoking it ' s investigatory powers under Section 4 . 11 of
13 the City Charter to initiate and conduct a formal
14 investigation of the form business affairs of this city.
15 Related to the city' s septic use and water permit and
16 Lake Jesup reclaimed augmentation plant . The first - -
17 was held on September 20th, a number of - - or a couple
18 of individuals were here and a number of others were
19 represented by legal counsel and this is simply a
20 reminder and an attempt, this is not a meeting in an
21 attempt to point blame at anyone . We ' re simply here to
22 gather facts . We ' re going to ask that both the
23 commission and anyone speaking before the dies please
24 stay on topic . As we did have - - during the last
25 meeting, I read through a lengthy list of guidelines for
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 5
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 this meeting and it is the dies present and has heard
2 those guidelines . It is my understanding that those
3 that were asked to come before us today, were provided
4 those same guidelines in advance . So I won ' t take the
5 time to read through them. Again, I believe it was
6 Commissioner Elliott at the last meeting - - again, I
7 think I can almost quote him, but basically we ' re here
8 not to point fingers . We ' re simply here to ask
9 questions and find out what the facts are . Maybe a
10 timeline of how things happened, why they happened, so
11 that we can have a better understanding of what ' s going
12 on . Okay. And so with that , it is my understanding
13 that for this evening there were to be two
14 representatives from CPH engineering here it ' s my
15 further understanding that one of them is present, if
16 I ' m not mistaken . Mr . David Gierach is present ; is that
17 right? If you wouldn ' t mind, sir, step forward, you can
18 take a seat forward. And is it safe to say that you
19 brought counsel with you or are you - -
20 MR . GIERACH: I did. No, no . Terry is - - Terry is
21 retired, so he ' s been living out in Colorado .
22 MR . MCCANN: Okay.
23 MR . GIERACH: Yeah, so he ' s only here part-time .
24 He was not available on this date so .
25 MR . MCCANN: Okay. And as we have done in the past
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 6
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 to be sworn for testimony. Christian, if you could take
2 care of that for us .
3 MR . GOWAN: Sorry, you just sat down, but if you
4 could stand.
5 MR . GIERACH: Absolutley.
6 MR . GOWAN: You if you can stand and raise your
7 right hand. Do you swear or affirm to tell the truth,
8 the whole truth and nothing but the truth?
9 MR . GIERACH: I do .
10 MR . GOWAN: Thank you.
11 MR . HAMNER : And, Mr. Mayor, I ' m Frank Hamner, I ' m
12 counsel for CPH, Mr. Gierach. Just to clear the record,
13 Mr . Zacky was not scheduled tonight and for my
14 understanding, as my conversations with Anthony, we just
15 scheduled David for tonight .
16 MR . MCCANN: Thank you and it was my understanding
17 that a subpoena was sent to him, however, he was not
18 scheduled; is that correct?
19 MR . HAMNER : Correct .
20 MR . MCCANN: Okay. Just for the record. Okay. So
21 having said that , I believe that we can open the
22 discussion before the commission and so the first name
23 on my list here, do - - do either of you gentlemen have
24 any questions before we begin - - get started?
25 MR . HAMNER : None right now.
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 7
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 MR. MCCANN: Okay. Deputy Mayor Cannon, You ' re
2 first up.
3 BY MR. CANNON:
4 Q Hello, Mr. Gierach, thank you for coming tonight .
5 Mr. Hamner, it ' s nice to meet you, sir.
6 As I have been trying to kind of piece things together,
7 there is a lot of documents obviously that the clerk has been
8 going through and at last that I have been looking through
9 and I think my fellow commissioners too. It looks like CPH
10 has had a contractual relationship for like close to 40
11 years , 38 years going back to like the late 801s . Right?
12 Early 80 ' s?
13 A 1974 , yes .
14 Q All right . So a long time . And I didn' t realize
15 that it went back that far but when I was looking at --
16 A Well , just to clarify --
17 Q Yes .
18 A That before was before we were CPH or before we
19 became Conklin, Porter and Holmes, so it was actually Clark
20 Gieson and Associates at that time . Cal Conklin, Walt Porter
21 and Bill Holmes formed CPH in 1981 actually Conklin Porter
22 Holmes engineers . So it was them back then.
23 Q and it was -- when I was looking through the some
24 of the paperwork here and I saw that back in 2002 the city
25 commission in July 8th of 2002 contracted for your company to
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 8
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 do a feasibility study in reclaimed water systems
2 supplementation and augmentation. And in that contract is
3 where I saw like Amendment Number 73 , you know, and I was
4 like, wow, that goes way back.
5 A Yes , sir.
6 Q And so I think we, as a city, have for many years
7 relied upon CPH to do design and engineering work for us on a
8 number of different projects , whether it ' s utilities or other
9 projects in the city. Is that your understanding?
10 A Yes , sir.
11 Q And your -- what is your position with CPH?
12 A I 'm president of CPH.
13 Q And how long have personally been with CPH?
14 A I have been with CPH for 35 years .
15 Q Oh, so the whole time? Okay. And so basically, it
16 looks like in 2002 the study was done, the feasibility study
17 and in that study what was contemplated was augmenting the
18 reuse water in the city taking into consideration future
19 growth and population, future demands, with the desired goal
20 being to use less potable drinking water for irrigation. Was
21 that your understanding as well?
22 A Yeah, I think I need to clarify a little bit . So
23 CPH we ' ve got about 250 employees . You know, so I have - - I
24 was not directly involved with the studies, you know, with
25 the work that was done here, but you know, Terry Zodky was
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 9
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 obviously the main representative for the city, you know, and
2 dealing with the city. But he had other people working with
3 him Dole Goutcher and other engineers that worked on this .
4 So a lot of the things that I know of, I may know of some of
5 the information from discussions from my -- with my staff and
6 that type of thing. But I will not know a lot of the details
7 and specifics because I was not the engineer that actually
8 worked on these projects
9 Q Okay. So --
10 MR. MCCANN: If I could just interrupt for just one
11 moment, I apologize . And just as a reminder for the
12 dais . During this last meeting we asked that each
13 commissioner be afforded ten minutes of questioning
14 before we move on to the next and then we ' ll bring him
15 back as many times as we need to . Just so that everyone
16 is aware, I 'm going to do two cycles on the - - my
17 apologies .
18 MR. CANNON: You ' re going to reset it twice, is
19 that what - -
20 MR. MCCANN: I got it . My apologies .
21 MR. CANNON: Oh, you got it?
22 MR. MCCANN: Yeah, I got it . My apologies .
23 BY MR. CANNON:
24 Q So William Goutcher, I saw his name on a lot of the
25 design documents and so forth. He was -- he and Mr. Zodky
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 10
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 would have had more hands on knowledge about the specific
2 Lake Jesup reuse water augmentation plant?
3 A Yes .
4 Q Is he still associated - - is Mr. Goutcher still
5 associated with CPH?
6 A He ' s been retired for many years now.
7 Q Do you know where he lives presently?
8 A I believe he ' s still located in Central Florida .
9 I 've seen him at UCF games before?
10 Q Okay.
11 A So yeah. Yeah. So I do believe the he ' s still - -
12 you know, he ' s still local , like - - I know I saw him late
13 last year at a UCF game, so.
14 Q Okay. And so since we have had our last meeting,
15 myself and I think others were using a dollar figure of 3 . 5
16 million for the Lake Jesup plant . We have since learned that
17 the correct dollar that was -- that was a combined figure for
18 the reuse plant plus the storage tank, you know, that was
19 going to be over behind Oak Forest . So I have talked with
20 the - - our CFO, our finance director and it ' s about 2 . 7
21 million dollars of tax payer money that ' s in this particular
22 plant at Lake Jesup . Okay. So I just wanted to clarify that
23 because when these questions were typed up quite some time
24 ago, it was before we had that available information. But
25 generally speaking, do you - - has it been the policy of CPH
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 11
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 that if it ' s retained by the city or any client to design a
2 system that the design should be done in order for the system
3 to perform in accordance with the specifications that - - to
4 perform the specifications of the system?
5 A Yes , sir.
6 Q Okay. So here, I believe, back in 2019 you were
7 given a report from of CDM, I think the manager gave you a
8 report from CDM that came from the outside and evaulated the
9 Lake Jesup plant, do you remember seeing that report?
10 A I have not read that report, but I do believe that
11 we have provided you with a report - -
12 Q So basically, that it was around that time that the
13 city was communicating with you that , Hey, we think there is
14 a problem with this plan and it ' s not performing.
15 Do you recall generally that that was the nature of the
16 conversation with you and then City Manager Shawn Boyle and
17 others?
18 MR. HAMNER. When you say, "Communications" , do you
19 mean communications in general because the only
20 communication that I ' m aware of is a single conversation
21 between CPH and with your present City Manager.
22 MR. CANNON: Yeah, that ' s what I 'm talking about .
23 They had a meeting --
24 MR. GIERACH: We had lunch.
25 BY MR. CANNON:
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 12
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 Q Okay. And that this was discussed and then I think
2 the former City manager Kevin Smith said that he had alos
3 maybe talked with you. But in any event -- maybe not . But
4 in any event, that ' s the first time that you learn of there
5 maybe a performance problem with the Lake Jesup Plant ; is
6 that fair to say?
7 A That ' s the first time we were made aware of any
8 concerns .
9 Q Okay. Now, part of the problem is that the plant
10 as it was permitted and designed, it was supposed to produce
11 a certain amount of water. It was permitted as a -- that the
12 application that Mr. Goutcher, from your company, filed with
13 the city to DEP said that the scope of or the objective of it
14 on paragraph five, page 2A-2 , that it was going to be a two
15 million gallon per day facility with a 240 , 000 gallon storage
16 tank right there by the lake . And then of course pumping
17 more water to a storage tank behind Oak Forest . So you
18 understood generally that was purpose or CPH would have
19 understood that ; fair enough?
20 A Yeah, sounds reasonable .
21 Q Okay. So the performance criteria for this plant,
22 it was suppose to take Lake Jesup water, filter it, add some
23 bleach to the water to knock out any biologicals and the --
24 or the output from the plant was suppose to have total
25 suspended solids of less than five milligram per liter, which
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 13
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 is a DEP standard. Did you understand that generally?
2 MR. HAMNER: Sir, this is understanding of record,
3 his understanding is largely irrelevant, but I mean is
4 there a point to whether Mr. Gierach individually
5 understood that ' s what the document says?
6 BY MR. CANNON:
7 Q So let me put it this way: So in the application
8 signed by Mr. Goutcher, CPH employee, it represented that the
9 affluent -- the out-put from the plant , would be total
10 suspended solids of less than 5 . 0 milligrams per liter. CPH
11 understood that ; fair enough?
12 MR. HAMNER: Assuming that you ' re reciting it
13 correctly - - I haven' t seen this document . But assuming
14 that you' re reciting it correctly, if that was CPH' s
15 submission, of course .
16 A Yeah, that ' s the standard. In order for -- in
17 order to blend the water, you know, for - - you know,
18 basically, advance secondary standards requires that -- you
19 know, five milligrams per liter. You know, and then you 've
20 got the chlorine reserve requirements .
21 Q Right .
22 A And so that ' s basically a requirement to be able to
23 blend the treatment water.
24 Q Okay. And then this was an irrigation plant, so in
25 my prior life, my family had a cattle ranch, and down in
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 14
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 Okeechobee a lot of ranchers and farmers had irrigation
2 pumps , right? And they didn ' t use them every day of the
3 year, but from time to time, when needed, they would kick on
4 the irrigation pump and use it to irrigate their crops or
5 their fields . And so CPH understood that this was an
6 irrigation augmentation pump to augment the reused water for
7 irrigation throughout the city?
8 A That was the purpose of the pump - -
9 Q Okay. So kind of a kin to when you buy a
10 multi-million dollar fire engine and the fire engine is
11 supposed to pump, say, 1500 gallons a minute . It doesn' t get
12 hooked up to the hydrant and pump 1500 gallons a minute, but
13 when you have a fire or when you it, it has to pump 1500
14 gallons a minute, fair enough?
15 A Fair enough.
16 Q And the same thing with irrigation-type pumps , when
17 you have -- when you have your crops or your lawns are drying
18 and dying and your plants are dying, you need that
19 irrigation. And that was the purpose of this plant was to be
20 able to augment your irrigation.
21 A Augment - - my understanding is , augment means
22 irrigation in part but also to potentially blend with the
23 reclaimed water.
24 Q Right . And my time has run out, I just want to ask
25 one more . So basically, when this was all being designed
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 15
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 going all of the way back to 2002 with that feasibility
2 study, CPH was projecting the future needs of reused water
3 based on my future growth of the city, because that was 2002 ,
4 20 years ago, and also based upon the requirement that
5 utilized more, and we reuse less potable water.
6 Did you understand that or did CPH understand that?
7 MR. HAMNER: I think the only missing element would
8 be that they would not have come up with those
9 representations out of thin air. It would have to have
10 had some input from the city as to what the expectations
11 were --
12 MR. CANNON: Oh, absolutely. And I 'm not
13 suggesting otherwise . The city and your engineer worked
14 collaboratively to project future growth and the future
15 demands of reused water based on future growth, based on
16 our declining cup, which concurrently required an
17 increase amount of utilization of reuse . And that would
18 have been a general understanding of CPH, fair enough?
19 MR. GIERACH: Yeah, we would have worked together
20 with the city staff . They would have given us
21 projections and we would have worked together. Longwood
22 we used, like, you know, numbers from the University of
23 Florida but you know we worked with the planners and
24 came up with those numbers and that ' s what we would
25 typically do, so I would assume --
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 16
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 MR. CANNON: And that ' s what it kind of looked like
2 from the report . Now, I ' m going to stop now to give my
3 fellow commissioners an opportunity.
4 MR. GIERACH: Okay.
5 MR. MCCANN: Commissioner Elliott .
6 BY MR. ELLIOT :
7 Q Good evening, Mr. Gierach. Am I pronouncing your
8 name correct?
9 A Gierach.
10 Q Gierach.
11 A A good german name .
12 Q Would it be ok if I called you David.
13 A David is perfectly fine .
14 Q So, David, I want to assure you that I have a very
15 informed understanding of the situation surrounding the Lake
16 Jesup reclaimed water or augmentation facility. I understand
17 what went right . I understand what went wrong, what needs to
18 be done . What studies have been done . The involved parties .
19 The actions on the of the city employees , actions on the part
20 of former elected officials . Actions on the part of state
21 licensing and regulatory entities . actions on the part of
22 various vendors . I understand all of that pretty well now,
23 as we have been going through this for quite a while . And I
24 have no intention pf asking any questions related to any of
25 these issues, as I believe at this point we ' re beyond those
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 17
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 types pf questions . It ' s my goal and I believe the goal of
2 the commission to learn what happen and why and to make sure
3 that we don ' t repeat any mistakes that were made . I do have
4 a few questions for you though and I would appreciate if you
5 could answer and if counsel is okay with that . If counsel
6 tells you not to answer, I 'm okay with that .
7 A Okay.
8 Q We have never met before, correct, David?
9 A We have not .
10 Q All right . Could you describe for me what your job
11 responsibilities were at CPH engineering in and around the
12 time the design and construction of this facility?
13 And I think this would be around the time of 2010 , 2011?
14 A It ' s -- we ' re going back aways .
15 Q We ' re going back aways .
16 A Yeah, so we - - I took over as president - - it would
17 have been 22 years ago . So I probably recently had assumed
18 those duties .
19 Q Okay. And as we sit here today, what are your job
20 responsibilities as president?
21 A Uh, I basically run the overall organization.
22 We ' ve got about 250 employees . We ' ve got a significant
23 number of engineers , architects, you know - - so I run the
24 overall management of the company and -- uh, that would be my
25 primary roles .
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 18
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 Q Okay. I know that every company is different .
2 would you have direct input of say, hiring or firing? Or is
3 that done at a level that reports to you?
4 A Both. I have -- many of my employees have been
5 with us for many, many years , and so they interview them,
6 they recommend the employees and I don ' t do all of the
7 interviews . Typically, I am asked about adding any new
8 employees and the approval of any knew new employees are from
9 me or my partner.
10 Q Okay. And from a fiduciary standpoint, do you sign
11 checks?
12 MR. HAMNER: I don ' t mind the background questions,
13 Commissioner Elliott, but I mean that ' s really not --
14 CPH ' s inner-workings are not really part of the subpoena
15 here . I 'm happy to go to some extent . You know,
16 there ' s going to have to be a point where we ' re getting
17 to the inside of CPH, it ' s really not --
18 MR. ELLIOT: I 'm just trying to figure out what
19 level of authority and what insight David had when all
20 of this was going on, that ' s my reasoning so --
21 MR. GIERACH: Yes, absolutely I had authority in
22 signing checks .
23 BY MR. ELLIOT :
24 Q Okay. So you could make financial decisions and
25 things like that, correct?
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 19
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 A Absolutely.
2 MR. HAMNER: I hope he signs my bills .
3 Q Right . There you go.
4 A Typically, I just approve the payments , I don ' t
5 sign.
6 Q Well , that was kind of my next question. Is it
7 actually your signature or other folks have authority to make
8 those - -
9 A Other folks have the authority to sign.
10 Q Okay. And were they basically the same
11 responsibilities in 2010 , 2011?
12 A I would say that they were basically the same .
13 same responsibilities .
14 Q Just a couple more questions .
15 A Uh-huh.
16 Q Do you know of any prior or existing insurance
17 coverage that could assist in rectifying the current
18 situation at this plant?
19 MR. HAMNER: That ' s way outside of the scope of the
20 subpoena.
21 MR. ELLIOT: Okay. Okay.
22 MR. HAMNER: There has been no claim against CPH as
23 I understand it , from what we were talking about here in
24 the beginning. This is not about placing blame or
25 making claims . And insurance coverage is grossly
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 20
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 irrelevant, I think.
2 BY MR. ELLIOT :
3 Q Okay. And if and when it comes to that down the
4 road, would CPH be willing to assist in figuring out exactly
5 what needs to be done at this plant?
6 A Well , yeah. We -- we have had a very long term
7 relationship with the City of Winter Springs . We ' re no
8 longer employed by the City of Winter Springs . If it was a
9 continued plant , we would typically work with them. I know I
10 think at this point , we were essentially fired and dismissed
11 by the city. So I don' t think we really have a working
12 relationship if we were to come in and assist . You know at
13 the time, Shawn notified us, you know, we would immediately
14 call the supplier and -- you know, and have them go out and
15 take a look at the facility and they had done pilot testing
16 on the unit . They were the ones that, you know, that
17 gathered with the city and did the pilot test and they' re the
18 one that said that the systems work and we went through the
19 start ups and we were asked to go look at it . We didn ' t hear
20 anything back. And from my understanding they went out there
21 and my guys went out there . And then we didn' t really hear
22 anything back from the city after they had gone out there so .
23 MR. HAMNER: And just to be clear, this is after
24 the lunch with the new city manager. CPH got the filter
25 manufacturer to go out there and take a look at it, take
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 21
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 a look at the plant and then they never heard anything
2 back. so I think to answer your question it illustrates
3 that if asked, they are willing to assist , but they have
4 to contractual relationship with the city right now.
5 MR. ELLIOT: Makes total sense . I appreciate your
6 time, thank you.
7 MR. MCCANN: And that brings us to Commissioner
8 Johnson.
9 BY MR. JOHNSON:
10 Q Good evening. A good number of my questions were
11 probably better suited for Terry. I wasn' t aware that he was
12 not going to be here and that he moved to Colorado. one of
13 my questions; however, was prior to this particular reclaim
14 augmentation plant, how many other similar plants has CPH
15 constructed, roughly?
16 MR. HAMNER: Prior to this plant?
17 Q Yes .
18 A It ' s not a real common thing, to do this , you ' re
19 using water to out of the river was a relatively new concept,
20 you know, so there ' s not a lot of these facilities out there,
21 but we had done the - - one of the few that I know that ' s out
22 there is for the City of Sanford. So we did an augmentation
23 system for them on Lake Monroe and that was done before this
24 and - - you know, so - - if you want to know more about that, I
25 will --
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 22
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 Q And to your knowledge, did that plant function as
2 designed and is it still working properly?
3 A Absolutely, yes .
4 Q And I 'm going to suggest that perhaps you aren' t - -
5 or not aware of - - or probably not aware of - - I had some
6 questions about the water samples that were taken in Lake
7 Jesup leading up to decisions on the filtration system of
8 this particular plant , were you privy to any of that?
9 A I would not be privy to any of that .
10 Q Okay.
11 A I do want to say that there was different
12 technology utilized at the Sanford facility than at this
13 facility.
14 Q Okay. Because in the CDM smith report, it
15 indicated that perhaps samples were taken in during the
16 winter months and apparently there weren ' t a great deal of
17 samples taken to get a full picture of the quality of the
18 water prior to the design of the filtration system, and I
19 don ' t think you were - -
20 A I would not be knowledgeable of that .
21 Q Okay. And the whole series of questions on
22 filters . One of the things that occurred at this plant , and
23 again, you may not be privy to this, but to me it was just
24 kind of a common sense thing. When Hurricane Irma struck a
25 few years ago and flooded the plant and apparently burnt out
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 23
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 expensive control panels and so forth, and -- I guess my
2 question is : From an engineering point of view -- I guess,
3 it ' s more of a statement , I was kind of surprised at that
4 because the lake is prone to doing that, and yet it was
5 constructed in such a manor that it occurred.
6 A I guess my only comment on that was, you know,
7 Terry Zodky and this - - I don' t know this for myself, but
8 that the panels were above the hundred year level elevation.
9 Yeah, so that would have been the requirement that it would
10 be set above the hundred year flood elevation and often
11 times , you know, these water bodies can go above that . And
12 you know, but you design to a certain level and in my
13 understanding, Terry said that that ' s was what was down.
14 Q Okay. But and then you would not be privy to any
15 of the water samples that were taken and logged during the
16 first part of the start up of this plan that would be - - that
17 would not be something that --
18 A No --
19 Q - - and then were you aware that they actually did a
20 bypass for flushing the system? Apparently our -- our own
21 utilities director attempted to do a back flush to the
22 filters did a bypass of the system. Were you aware of any of
23 that?
24 MR. HAMNER: My hesitation was to define the word,
25 "They" , but you ' re saying the utility director from the
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 24
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 city directed that bypass?
2 Q Yeah, were aware that he had done that?
3 A I was not aware of it . I think Terry my have
4 mentioned something to to me, you know, that the --
5 basically, if you ' re blending with the reclaimed water, then
6 you have to meet the reclaim standards . If you separate the
7 systems and you ' re not blending then there is no requirement
8 on the irrigation water. Just like down on the cow pastures ,
9 there is no requirement to meet those standards . You know,
10 so at that point, if they were just irrigating parks then
11 that is certainly something that , you know, would potentially
12 make sense .
13 Q Yeah, the reason I asked was that it seemed like,
14 you know, something as drastic as bypassing the filteration
15 system seems to me like someone at CPH should have been
16 consulted before that happened. There is no supporting
17 documentation that I could see that no one --
18 A I do not know if we were aware of it or any of our
19 employees were aware of it .
20 Q Okay. Yeah. My fellow commissioners, my questions
21 were more geared towards the engineer. So that ' s all I have,
22 thank you.
23 A Okay.
24 MR. MCCANN: And that brings us to Commissioner
25 Benton.
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 25
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 BY MR. BENTON:
2 Q I just have a few questions .
3 A Yes , sir.
4 Q And you said earlier that you just discovered that
5 it was brought to your attention the plant wasn ' t working.
6 When was that you had the lunch --
7 A It was when Shawn was the acting city manager.
8 Q Do you remember approximately when that was?
9 A I - -
10 Q 2019?
11 MR. HAMNER: In response to the written questions ,
12 we noted that it was October of 2019 .
13 Q Okay. Then before you guys signed off on the
14 completion of the plant, the papers have got your name on
15 them, I 'm assuming that you-all signed off . Did they -- do
16 you know if there was any testing done on how the plant was
17 working?
18 A I was not involved with it direct but certainly any
19 other facility that we would have done, you know, we would
20 have done start up testing, we would have had the
21 manufacturer there, we would have run through the whole set
22 up, you know, the whole operations of the facility to make
23 sure that it was working adequately and properly and meeting
24 the standards . So we would have gone through all of that and
25 then, you know, I 'm sure our engineer would have certified
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 26
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 that meet the needs . So they would have had testing data
2 that would have verified that the system was working as
3 designed.
4 Q So unless it was working as designed at that time,
5 you wouldn' t have signed off?
6 A They should have not signed off on it, unless
7 they' re certifying that it meets those requirements and I 'm
8 assuming that they certified the DEP, which is typically a
9 requirement of DEP, you know, permit engineering record and
10 we ' re certifying that it ' s meeting those standards .
11 Q Okay. The other question I had was - - because I
12 don ' t really understand, the reading and the reality of you
13 talking about , it was just to water the park and some other
14 people have mentioned that too . Was this facility designed
15 to only bring enough augmentation water to water the park or
16 was it initially designed to do more than that?
17 A I 'm not aware of what the directions were as far as
18 what the design capacity and what it was created -- intended
19 to water. I didn' t know that but my understanding was that
20 it was going to be a reclaimed water augmentation system.
21 Q Okay. That was all from me .
22 MR. MCCANN: And that brings us to Commissioner
23 Hale?
24 BY MS . HALE :
25 Q And you said that there was a plant done in
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 27
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 Sanford?
2 A Yes .
3 Q And that was on Lake Monroe?
4 A That ' s on Lake Monroe .
5 Q Okay. And does it have any issues, because I
6 understood that part of our issue is when we are pulling in
7 water, it ' s clogging up these filters and that sort of thing.
8 What kind of system is different there than from here?
9 A Well , that ' s a system, it ' s called Active Flow,
10 that ' s the name of that system that we install there . our
11 actual -- it ' s interesting and I know that you have the
12 details of it but our contract was to design that system for
13 you-all .
14 Q Okay.
15 A And during the design process, I think, it was you
16 know this is all hearsay, this is not my direct knowledge,
17 and such just so you understand that , I 'm not talking about
18 just hearsay from what I heard from my my people, but the
19 city did not want , you know, at the time it ' s - - if you go
20 see it, it ' s a very large concrete structure . It ' s very - -
21 it ' s probably, I guess about 30 foot tall , you know, so it ' s
22 very big industrial looking facility, active flow system.
23 And so they were -- they did not want, you know, that
24 type of facility at the lake and it ' s also my understanding
25 that also it was a much more expensive system. So it was
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 28
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 much more costly. For example, at that plant we actually do
2 the Active Flow System and then we actually follow -- full
3 filtration following that, we are located - - co-located at
4 the waste water treatment plant . So we go from the Active
5 Flow System, and we go - - you have just the filter component .
6 So we go through the Active Flow System and it ' s followed by
7 filters , which is similar to what amiant (ph. ) filters would
8 have been. So we have gotten, you know, deep bed dynaset - -
9 dynasamp (ph. ) bed filters that follow that active flow
10 treatment and then it goes to our point of contact chamber
11 and then it ' s clean with reclaimed water. So it ' s much more
12 expensive and much more larger system and my understanding is
13 that they were concerned, you know, installing that at that
14 location. We have used the amiant filters and I ' ve got those
15 - - we 've got those installed at Sanford at their -- Site 10 ,
16 facility. We ' ve got them at Sanford at one of the storage - -
17 it ' s a burrow pit that we converted into storage . We ' ve got
18 them there . We ' ve got them at Cigar Lake, which is a
19 reclaimed storage burrow pit and we converted it at the City
20 of Palm Coast . So we have used them the amiant filters, you
21 know, in the past too . So that ' s kind of the history and
22 understanding of -- from me of what went on with the design.
23 A All right . Do you know if there is any new
24 technology that you retrofitted into our facility - -
25 Q You can put Active Flow ahead of these - - these
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 29
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 units and it will - - you know, it ' s going to drastically
2 improve that operation. You know, you can come and see the
3 Sanford units and, you know, we ' d be glad to give you a tour,
4 you know, show you that facility. And, yeah, you know,
5 basically, you know - - I think it would have been our
6 recommendations . I don ' t know exactly what happened during
7 the design process, but obviously we ' re lead by the clients
8 on what the client ' s requirements are . I don ' t know what
9 happened in that process .
10 Q I know that there were two different filter systems
11 that you recommended the membrane and the fabric -- fabric
12 cover?
13 A Yes , so they were probably looking at disc filters,
14 you know, instead of these amiant filters that you put in and
15 disc filters . But really the Active Flow, what the Active
16 Flow does , is that it acts more like a clarifier, so it
17 actually, you know, you have a lot of cholera and chemex in
18 the water, so it coagulates those and it settles that
19 material out, so that the water that you get going to your
20 filter is a much cleaner water.
21 Q And now, on here somewhere, I saw that , but it says
22 that -- under the analyst and everything that the water was
23 satisfactory for this kind of thing, to filter the water and
24 that you-all recommended the fabric disc and the membrane
25 disc --
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 30
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 MR . HAMNER : Ms . Hale, when you say, "On here" ,
2 what are you referring to?
3 MS . HALE : Say that again, I ' m sorry?
4 MR . HAMNER : When you say, "On here" , you ' re
5 looking at something . What are you referring to?
6 MS . HALE : I apologize . The Reclaimed Water
7 Augmentation Study.
8 MR . HAMNER : The 2005 study?
9 MS . HALE : I ' m not sure - -
10 MR . HAMNER : That ' s the one referenced in the
11 resolution .
12 MS . HALE : Thank you.
13 MR . HAMNER : Yeah.
14 MS . HALE : Yes, 2005 .
15 MR . HAMNER : So in that study you ' re saying that
16 CPH recommended some membrane and the fabric filters?
17 MS . HALE : Fabric filters - - let me get back to it .
18 one second. I apologize . On page 4 through 5 , it talks
19 about the treatment process required on the filter would
20 not be a difficult one . The water quality of the water
21 range of the - - in the last paragraph. And then on to
22 the next page, paragraph 4 through 7 , is the one where
23 it was recommending the disc, the fabric disc and the
24 membrane .
25 MR . HAMNER : So that was in a 2005 study, not in
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 31
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 the 2011 design?
2 MS . HALE : Right . Right .
3 MR. HAMNER: Okay.
4 BY MS . HALE :
5 Q So my biggest question was is the Sanford plant and
6 what different and the different technology. So I would love
7 to come and check out the Sanford plant .
8 A Let me know and we ' d be glad to take you out there
9 and give you a tour and see how the plant operates --
10 Q We just have to find closure - - so I appreciate you
11 MR. HAMNER: Winter Springs and Sanford get along,
12 it ' s not some East Coast , West Coast thing. You guys
13 are all right?
14 MR. JOHNSON: So far.
15 A Let me know, like I said, I ' ll be glad to arrange
16 something and get you out there and show you --
17 Q Thank you very much.
18 MR. MCCANN: And that brings us back to Deputy
19 Mayor Cannon.
20 BY MR. CANNON:
21 Q So if - - when a plant like this is constructed and
22 it ' s coming online before everything is certified and you
23 know that it ' s performing and they do the commissioning and
24 the testing and the - - and the preliminary stuff to make sure
25 that it ' s working, your engineers are there to make sure that
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 32
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 it ' s working as - - it ' s performing as it was designed; is
2 that fair to say?
3 A Yes , our engineers would typically be there as part
4 of the start up .
5 Q And if your engineers learned that it was not
6 performing up to the design specifications, that if it was
7 producing water that exceeded the five milligrams per liter
8 of total suspended solids, for example, what would your
9 engineers be expected to do?
10 A Well , I would have to go back and look at the
11 specifications, but most likely, you know, as part of the
12 filter specifications for amiant , when they did pilot
13 testing, was my understanding. We -- so there would be
14 performance specifications and we would go back to that
15 manufacturer. And have them take the necessary actions to
16 correct - - together with the city obviously and since the
17 contract is , you know, with the contractor or - - and -- and
18 - - with the - - to the manufacturer would be through the city.
19 You know, we would work with the city and we would recommend
20 that we go back to the manufacturer. Yeah, we would require
21 them a propose solution fix.
22 Q So the people - - and I realize that you weren ' t the
23 President back then and you weren' t day-to-day handling this,
24 but would Terry Zodky and William Goutcher be two people that
25 would have more likely than not had been in communication
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 33
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 with our utility director Tim Lotcuff (ph. ) on these kind of
2 issues that we ' ve been discussing, performance issues and so
3 forth?
4 A Yes . William Goutcher, if there was any - - you
5 know, I know that had was the actual engineer, but he was
6 working closely with Terry and he was the main --
7 Q Okay. And have you -- since this issue arose in
8 October of 2019 , have you talked with either Terry or William
9 - - Terry Zodky or William Goutcher and asked them, Hey, back
10 when we were commissioning this plant and testing it and
11 bringing it online were there any issues with performance?
12 did you have any inquiries with them about that?
13 A Terry told me, as far as he knew of, you know,
14 there weren ' t any issues with it .
15 Q Okay.
16 A So we weren ' t made aware of any issues and
17 obviously we must have done testing and there wasn' t any
18 issues brought up and it with have been turned over to the
19 city at that point for operations and we weren' t made aware
20 of any issues with the facility. You know, obviously, we ' ve
21 got a long term relationship with the city and if they would
22 have had problems , together, they would have come and talked
23 to us .
24 Q And that ' s because I know that Mr. Lotcuff for me
25 many years is our utility director worked closely with your
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 34
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 firm and with Terry - - and I guess , I have never met -- I 've
2 met Terry, but I ' ve never met Mr . Goutcher, but it seems
3 logical that if there was problems that that would have been
4 communicated at same time to CPH. And we have got some
5 documentation that it wasn ' t working as it should have back
6 at -- when it was starting up it was - - there was a problem
7 with it . Would there be documentation at CPH where you would
8 keep emails or documentation such as that that might reflect
9 that the utility direct Tim Lotcuff reached out to CPH
10 saying, Hey, we ' re having a problem?
11 MR. HAMNER: When you' re talking about documents to
12 reflect that there were problems at start-up, are you
13 saying that there were communications with CPH or these
14 are internal city documents?
15 MR. CANNON: No, I 'm talking - - well , what I want
16 to know is, do -- you would have in your archive of your
17 records that CPH, this plant only came online less than
18 10 years ago. You would have some communication files,
19 email files if someone at the city said, Hey, this isn' t
20 filtering adequately or we ' re not getting the volume
21 output adequately, I would think that you would have
22 some file materials . Have you looked to see if any of
23 that exists?
24 MR. HAMNER: No, sir. Not under my direction they
25 have not looked to see if they exist . Our records
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 35
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 retention policy doesn ' t go back 10 or 11 years, like,
2 most places don ' t go back 10 or 11 years . But if there
3 had been emails at the time, there would have been
4 interactivity between the city and CPH, so it wouldn ' t
5 be a one way thing that CPH would have to maintain
6 emails . You guys would have had initiated that contact
7 - -
8 MR . CANNON: Yeah, well I would like to hear from
9 Mr . Gierach, okay? Not - - respectfully, Mr. Hamner. I
10 would like to hear from Mr . Gierach. If someone were to
11 pick up the phone from the city, and call either Terry
12 or call William - - Bill and said, Hey, we ' re having
13 problems with these filters . They ' re plugging up
14 because organic - - you know, they' re plugging up and
15 we ' re not getting the volume and it ' s constantly back
16 flushing and, you know, it ' s not working . Would there
17 be some documentation of that, like a memo to the file
18 or something?
19 MR . HAMNER : That ' s kind of a speculative
20 speculation. It ' s like if they called, if you - - did he
21 answer the call and if they had a record. Again, if
22 records exist, CPH would have maintain them in their
23 regular record retention policy. Mr . Gierach can say
24 the same thing .
25 MR . GIERACH: You know, I guess the only thing that
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 36
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 I would say is that we had a very long term relationship
2 with the city and had they told us that they' re having
3 trouble with something, we would have been out there
4 trying to fix it . You know, we would have been working
5 with them and trying to repair whatever the problem is .
6 You know, like I said, we have a 50 -- almost a 50-year
7 relationship with the city that we had, you know. So
8 yeah, absolutely, if we would have been made aware of
9 anything, we would have worked with them to figure it
10 out what it would take to make things work --
11 BY MR. CANNON:
12 Q And as you sit here, you haven ' t done specific
13 research of documents in that regard, but - -
14 A I have not .
15 Q - - but if we talk to William and if we talk to
16 Terry, they would probably be the most likely sources if such
17 conversations or communications occurred; is that fair?
18 A If there was communications, it would have been to
19 them not to me .
20 Q Yeah, that ' s what I figured --
21 A And if it came to me, it means that we were
22 responding, so.
23 Q Okay.
24 A So yeah, it would not have been to me .
25 Q And if the through put is not 700 gallons a minute
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 37
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 but is only like 300 gallons per minute, again, that would
2 likely be caused by a plugging up of these filters from the
3 organic content and so forth?
4 A I can ' t really comment on what potentially would
5 have caused that problem.
6 Q Okay. Do you know if CPH engineers before they --
7 when they were doing their analysis of the source water from
8 Lake Jesup, if they took into consideration total organic
9 carbon, dissolved organic carbon, heterotrophic plate counts
10 coliformen and fecal coliformen data in the Lake Jesup water,
11 the source water that this plant was going to be drawing
12 from, do you know if that was taken into consideration.
13 A I was not involved with direct design so I do not
14 know.
15 Q Okay. And do you feel that the Amiade Model AMF
16 37-K microfiber filtration system, as it was put into this
17 plant , was susceptible to organic and biological fowling that
18 it was prone for that?
19 A I 'm not really sure I can really make a statement
20 on that . I mean I did not research the specific equipment
21 and models that were specified. My understanding is that
22 they did pilot testing and this is what the manufacturer came
23 back and recommended, is my understanding.
24 Q Okay. And we appreciate you coming here and I
25 think that the other two engineers that had more hands on,
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 38
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 will probably be able to fill in some of the gaps . We ' re
2 trying to found out now -- we ' re trying to connect the dots
3 up, like, at some point it ' s apparent that this 2 . 7 million
4 dollar plant has not worked adequately and I view this as
5 kind of a two-step process . One, engineers like yourself or
6 others are going to have to figure out modifications, if any,
7 that could be made to the plan. The other part of our
8 analysis, at least for me is , how did this kind of go off the
9 rails? Why wasn' t it reported either to you? If it was or
10 wasn' t? Why wasn' t it reported to the commission? You know,
11 in other words, why are we finding out about it now, in 2021
12 - - 2019 , when we need the additional water and we have a
13 plant that doesn' t work. And that ' s the other half of the
14 analysis that we ' re trying to go through as to make sure
15 systemic -- system wide procedurally in our city that we can
16 - - lesson learned and we can make sure that we can implement
17 procedures and going forward that it won ' t happen again.
18 Those are the two steps .
19 Is there there anything else that you can think of, Mr.
20 Gierach, that we haven ' t discussed about -- oh, I wanted to
21 ask you this, have you had any conversations with Former
22 Mayor Charles Lacey or any of the former commissioners of the
23 city regarding any of the Lake Jesup plant, it ' s performance
24 or any concerns or anything like that?
25 A Uh, no. I did have a call from Charles Lacey once
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 39
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 when they were issued the subpoenas, but they - - I think he
2 was just asking me if I had been issued a subpoena.
3 Q Okay. And did - - now, whether to your knoeledge do
4 you know if any of the other CPH employees like Mr. Zodky or
5 Mr. Goutcher received any communication from, you know,
6 Former Mayor Lacey or any of the other commissioners about
7 the plant?
8 A Not that I ' m aware of , but I do not know.
9 Q And same question, Kip Lotcuff - - you know, Kip,
10 right?
11 A Yes , I do know.
12 Q Have you had any communications with Kip regarding
13 this plant directly or any issues involving this plant or - -
14 A I have not .
15 Q Okay. I don ' t have anything further.
16 MR. MCCANN: Thank you, Deputy Mayor. And that
17 brings us to Commissioner Elliott .
18 BY MR. ELLIOT :
19 Q Uh, David, just kind of a couple of follow-up
20 questions to Commissioner Hale ' s line of questioning.
21 A Uh-huh.
22 Q And I 'm not trying to look for free consulting here
23 from an engineering firm, but it sounds apparently to me that
24 this active flow system was considered early on, but because
25 of costs it was probably - -
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 40
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 A I - - I -- I 'm not aware of what happened through
2 the design process . I do remember talking to Terry and then
3 our proposal was to do an Active Flow, so - - but what
4 happened after that , I 'm not really aware of .
5 Q Makes sense . And is the Active Flow System still
6 state of the art technology for this?
7 A Yes .
8 Q So there ' s no additional newer technology, cheaper,
9 better, faster?
10 A No, it ' s a very, very new technology at the time .
11 Q So active flow is - - and so as you sit here today,
12 if we were going to do this from scratch having never done it
13 before, you would still recommend the Active Flow System?
14 A I would recommend the Active Flow for all of the
15 bio-filtration.
16 Q And just like they have in Sanford?
17 A Just like they have in Sanford. It ' s a proven
18 system, it works well -- same water quality, it ' s very
19 similar - -
20 Q Right . Great . Thank you.
21 MR. MCCANN: Commissioner Benton.
22 BY MR. BENTON:
23 Q When did your employment with the City of Winter
24 Springs end with your company, when did you-all stop working
25 for the City of Winter Springs?
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 41
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 A I 'm not aware of the specific date .
2 Q Was it sometime after 2013?
3 A I - - I ' m not aware of the specific dates .
4 MR. HAMNER: It ' s hard to answer Commissioner
5 Benton, because there are probably master services
6 agreements that come with work-orders . Those master
7 servicer agreements are rarely ever officially
8 terminated. You just don' t get the calls no more .
9 MR. GIERACH: I know we did City Hall . I know we
10 did that -- I 'm not sure when that was done .
11 BY MR. BENTON:
12 Q Concerning the augmentation plant, you guys signed
13 off on it in 2013 , that ' s when - - I ' m assuming it was
14 finished at that point , your duties would have been finished
15 at that point with the augmentation plant in 2013?
16 A I guess , I ' m taking your word that that ' s when we
17 certified that . I don ' t know the specific dates but --
18 Q If you all would have had any service agreements
19 after that?
20 A Typically not . You typically, we would finish
21 design and once we get through the design, and construction
22 services we typically would not have any involvement at that
23 point .
24 Q And then you said your next knowledge of it not
25 working was in 2019 , which would have been -- what is that - -
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 42
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 six or seven years later? Six years?
2 A Yes , sir.
3 Q Okay. So something must have happened in between
4 which you wouldn' t have any knowledge of ; is that right? If
5 it ' s not working now.
6 MR. HAMNER: I don ' t understand your question.
7 MR. BENTON: In 2019 it was discovered it wasn' t
8 working properly and it was brought to your attention,
9 but it was finished in 2013 , that ' s six years . So
10 something must have happened that you wouldn' t know
11 about between then, is that what you might be saying?
12 MR. HAMNER: Let me had some clarity form our
13 written statement as well . They finished the work
14 approximately in 2013 , the meeting in October of 2019
15 was not called on augmentation plant , it was merely a,
16 hey we ' re out here, you' re the new city manager, this - -
17 this came up in this conversation between the time that
18 the plant was finished until that informal conversation,
19 CPH had not been contacted about any failings or in
20 anyway about the operation of the plant .
21 MR. GIERACH: That ' s my understanding.
22 BY MR. BENTON:
23 Q That ' s what I was wondering, had nobody contacted
24 you and say anything or ask any questions?
25 A You know, me personally? No.
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 43
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 Q Or you wouldn ' t have known - -
2 A Staff-wise, I 'm not aware of - - what they have been
3 - - what I have been told. I haven ' t talked to Bill Goutcher
4 about it, so -- Bill is, you know, he ' s - - he ' s much older at
5 this point, so I don' t know, you know, if he ' d be available
6 or not . But yeah, I did talk with Terry about it . And Terry
7 had said nobody had contacted us .
8 MR. HAMNER: Given the relationship with the city
9 though, there had been any contact , it would have likely
10 gotten to you?
11 MR. GIERACH: If there was an issue, you know, a
12 serious issue, then I would have assumed that , you know,
13 Kevin - - Obviously I know Kevin Smith very well , he use
14 to be at the City of Sanford, you know, so I ' ve known
15 him for many, many years . So Kevin certainly would have
16 called me and said, Hey, you need to take care of this
17 thing and we would have .
18 MR. BENTON: Thank you.
19 MR. MCCANN: And Commissioner Johnson.
20 BY MR. JOHNSON:
21 Q I was just looking over a statement submitted to us
22 from Kip Lotcuff and he described bypassing the filter
23 system, but then he went on to state, replacing or modifying
24 the internal filtering units and the secondary filter with
25 coarser media was still an alternative being pursued in 2017
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 44
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 although the overseas manufacturer was difficult to almost
2 impossible to deal with. The facility was designed for three
3 secondary filters . But only one was purchased with th
4 initial construction. We declined to purchase secondary
5 filter number 2 that was used as an alternative at a cost of
6 around $200 , 000 to expand usage beyond the parts needed, the
7 existing filter needs to be retrofitted and/or the new
8 remaining filters need to be able to pass a larger particle
9 size but still meet the permit TSS requirements . My question
10 is -- you brought up Active Flow?
11 A Yes .
12 Q Am I pronouncing it right?
13 A Yes , sir.
14 Q And with this - - with three secondary filters of
15 this design, was that an alternative to spending the
16 additional money for the Active Flow part of a system similar
17 to Sanford? Is that - - when I 'm listening to your
18 conversation, I 'm kind of guessing that they have all of
19 these filters to kind of do a work around from -- for
20 avoiding the cost of the Active Flow, is that - - am I
21 thinking right on that?
22 A The filters - - you know, I think one of issues, you
23 know, a filter that ' s filtering these particles is going to
24 have increased maintenance, increased back wash, you know,
25 because the filters are going to have to potentially back
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 45
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 wash significantly more to ba able to clean those materials
2 out . And the Active Flow is very similar to your waste water
3 plant , you have a clarifier out in front of your filters .
4 you know, that clarifier drops out a significant portion of
5 the solids, so you' re not seeing all of those solids through
6 your filters, you know, like the filters in your waste water
7 plant . So you' re not seeing all of those solids into that
8 filter. And you know the issue that you got is , you know,
9 not that that filter maybe - - it could be able to handle it ,
10 but the issue becomes it is increased maintenance it will
11 significantly increase back wash to get them cleaned out . So
12 if you have something like an Active Flow clarifier out in
13 front of that , then you reduce a lot of those solids . And
14 so, you know, your reduce the loading that ' s going to your
15 filters . So it ' s going to be less maintenance activity and
16 - - and itself going to be better water quality.
17 MR. HAMNER: The way that I hear you describe it,
18 Commissioner Johnson, is that there was a down stream
19 filter from the main filter that was potentially
20 specified as an alternate that could have been added to
21 the system, is what I understood you saying.
22 MR. JOHNSON: Well , that ' s what Kip has stated in
23 his written - -
24 MR. HAMNER: Right . Alternates in a contract are
25 typically written that you have got a base bid and if
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 46
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 you want to get these other extra things , they' re
2 alternates and you can add them, you know, in the add
3 hawk way.
4 BY MR. JOHNSON:
5 Q Well , for the - - for the facility to be designed
6 for three secondary filters, is that , in your experience,
7 common for a plant, let ' s say for example, the plant in
8 Sanford, does it have three secondary filters down stream - -
9 A Yeah, you know, if you look at the City of Sanford,
10 we ' ve got , six thiacin (ph. ) filters and we 've got two
11 traveling bridge filters and then we 've got - - you know,
12 we ' ve got a significant number of filters on that facility.
13 Q So in this case, three secondary filters will be
14 very common?
15 A I would need to look at the specifics of your
16 design and, you know, like I said, are these parallel or are
17 they -- they intended -- you know, are they in a series? You
18 know, typically, parallel you need back up units and all of
19 that . Capacity of the units , increase the capacity of the
20 systems in a series is unusual , but you can do a coarser
21 filter, it ' s going to take up bigger materials and then have
22 a finer filter down stream. And then, you know, that could
23 have been the design concept after that I would have to look
24 at the specifics --
25 Q And than what you had just stated would seem to
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 47
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 support what Kip has shared with us . And that they were
2 looking at possibly putting -- getting a second filter, and
3 apparently they purchased one .
4 A Yeah, it wouldn ' t be that uncommon to -- you know,
5 you have a filter up front , then that would be removed with a
6 more coarse material , so you take out the significant amount
7 of the loadings , so you have a much finer material going to a
8 finer screen. You know, and so, you know, and potentially if
9 you did that in a series , that would potentially address the
10 loading issues with the filters .
11 Q Because everything that I have - - that there seems
12 to be a common thread through this that the filters are too
13 efficient .
14 A Right .
15 Q The way that they were designed. So it just seems
16 to me that perhaps this was put in place as an alternative to
17 the Active Flow System. And I don ' t - - I guess I 'm trying to
18 see if that was the thinking.
19 A I could not tell you what that decision making
20 process was .
21 Q Okay. Thank you.
22 MR. MCCANN: And that brings us back to
23 Commissioner Elliott .
24 MR. ELLIOT: No, I withdraw.
25 MR. MCCANN: Commissioner -- Deputy Mayor Cannon.
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 48
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 MR. HAMNER: Did you get Commissioner the second
2 round?
3 MR. MCCANN: They' re hitting buttons and I ' m going
4 by who is active or requested to speak.
5 MR. HAMNER: Oh.
6 BY MR. CANNON:
7 Q So Mr. Gierach, if the system is designed, but it ' s
8 not meeting the specifications , in other words, the filters
9 are clogging up too quickly, the through put is not adequate
10 and the output has too high of total suspended solids , that ' s
11 when the engineering firm such as yours says, okay, this is
12 not really an option anymore in order to comply with your DEP
13 permit, you have to add this other filter, right? In order
14 for it to come into complaint, you wouldn ' t write that
15 recommendation?
16 A I think what we would do as part of this contract
17 with the city, typically if we ' re providing construction
18 services for this project, what we would do is that we would
19 be looking at that specified equipment - -
20 Q Right .
21 A - - and you would run it and you would verify that
22 it ' s -- that it can meet the requirements , you know, of the
23 specification. I know about back wash rates , what they
24 identified it as in the specifications , but those are
25 typically the only things that are identified as part of
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 49
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 those specifications, what are acceptable back wash rates and
2 then those types of things . And you know, there are varying
3 conditions, and I know that there was discussions about the
4 water quality worse than what it was and I don' t know any of
5 that, you know. So all of those things can all impact the
6 back wash rates and the loading for those filters too . So
7 you know, once we certify -- once we go through the process ,
8 and together with the city, we ' ll work together with the
9 city, because the city is making the final payments and we
10 verify that the contractor that ' s built this thing and it ' s
11 in compliance with plans and specifications that were
12 prepared, which were permitted by DEP and therefore, if it
13 meets specifications, it should be in compliance with DEP
14 requirements and we would certify that based on the results
15 that are current at that time . After that point in time, you
16 know, it becomes an operational issue and the city is dealing
17 with it and it ' s operation maintenance, you know, typically
18 we have no involvement , you know, unless someone calls and
19 asks us , you know. And that they want help, that they' re
20 having issues , and that type of thing.
21 But yeah, you know, eventually we ' ll get back involved
22 again. But you know, after we do that certification and
23 really those plans, they' re not ours , you know. So -- so the
24 operation of maintenance takes over.
25 Q So the start-up - - if the problem arises during
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 50
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 that start-up commissioning at the front end, then before you
2 certified it to the state, you ' re engineer would probably
3 say, Hey, we ' re not meeting our performance we may have to go
4 a head and add another filter or we do this or that , is that
5 reasonable?
6 A Yes , sir. We would either do that or we would go
7 back to the manufacturer because most likely it was a
8 performance based specifications . Could go back to the
9 manufacturer and tell them that we need these requirements
10 that were dictated within that specification.
11 Q And you would not - - your engineer would not do
12 that certificate to DEP or the water management certificate
13 completion or construction or whatever that certification is
14 until the planet would have been tested and it was working
15 and then you would sign off on it . Is that basically the way
16 it would work?
17 A Yes , sir.
18 Q Okay. All right . Well , I appreciate it . Thank
19 you for answering the questions tonight .
20 A Yes , sir.
21 MR. MCCANN: Commissioner Hale .
22 BY MS . HALE :
23 Q Just a quick question, you ' re talking about the
24 operation and management of city staff after you had
25 certified that it was operational . /
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 51
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 MR. HAMNER: Operation maintenance .
2 Q Yeah, I 'm sorry. Operation maintenance .
3 Do you have anything to do with training the staff when
4 you - - when you ' re there to make sure that they' re
5 understanding the operation maintenance and how to go forward
6 and to make sure that we ' re able to take care of the
7 equipment properly, it is millions of dollars - -
8 A Yes , yes . Typically within our specifications,
9 we ' ll require the manufacturers to supply the equipment to
10 provide training to the operators and you know it ' s usually
11 - - you know, they have a certain amount of time that they
12 have got to come out and work with the operators and train
13 them on how to do the equipment, train them on how to do the
14 maintenance . You know, so that ' s - - that would be typically
15 and I would assume that would be in our specifications
16 requirements of that manufacturer.
17 Q Thank you very much.
18 MR. HAMNER: And Commissioner Hale, that would extend
19 through the warranty period as well , so - -
20 MR. HALE : Okay. Perfect , thank you.
21 MR. HAMNER: So that would be a period of time that the
22 manufacturer would still be on the hook for it and making
23 sure that everything is working properly.
24 MR. GIERACH: Correct .
25 MS . HALE : Okay.
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 52
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 MR. MCCANN: And then Commissioner Johnson.
2 BY MR. JOHNSON:
3 Q I just had one last question. I believe you have
4 this document , it ' s the CDM Smith memorandum. And if you
5 look at that --
6 MR. HAMNER: We don' t have that, Mr. Johnson.
7 Q Oh.
8 A I believe Terry was provided that document . I have
9 not reviewed that document .
10 Q Oh, okay. We ' ll I don ' t think you really need it .
11 These are - - if you can see, these are the recordings of
12 water samples . Can you see that it ' s hand written?
13 A Okay.
14 Q Is that standard procedure - - I mean this is --
is this is summer of 2013 .
16 MR. HAMNER: Who wrote those up, do you know?
17 Q I 'm not sure . But this is apparently what the --
18 what we were doing to sample the water quality coming out of
19 plant and it ' s hand written, like, is that standard? It
20 never seemed to me that it would be on a spreadsheet .
21 A If it ' s work not being done, you know, it ' s not
22 lavatory, so these wouldn' t be like reporting, you know,
23 results . So, you know, it ' s very likely it was done by - - I
24 would assume city staff .
25 Q Well , my question is : Is that - - would that be
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 53
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 standard procedure? Is that what Sanford does?
2 A It ' s no reporting so it ' s not documents - - so, you
3 know, if you' re doing testing and that type of thing, you ' re
4 not reporting it to anybody, so you' re not having to submit
5 this as DEP reports or that type of thing. So you know, if
6 your operators and they say okay you guys measure it,
7 maintain, you know, check the PSS levels and all of that, you
8 know, that would not be that uncommon.
9 Q Well , in the process of signing off and certifying
10 the plant operational , does CPH require documentation similar
11 to this with the water quality?
12 MR. HAMNER: Just to clarify. Are you asking
13 similar to -- to the specifications, the numbers, the
14 output reports, like, what the plant is doing or are you
15 saying require handwritten notes about that?
16 MR. JOHNSON: Well , I guess my question is : What
17 do you -- what would be typical of a requirement for
18 signing off on an augmentation plant , such as , this one
19 when you' re looking at water quality coming out of the
20 plant after the it ' s been processed?
21 MR. GIERACH: I would say, you know, potentially,
22 we would require certified labs to, you know, often
23 times to verify data. But if the city has , you know,
24 often times the city can do laboratory testing. So the
25 city at their waste water plant will - - you know, they
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 54
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 test for TSS, chlorine residual , they do all of that all
2 on their own.
3 BY MR. JOHNSON:
4 Q So then you would require --
5 A So the city provided that for them, we ' re not
6 requiring that they certify information from the city, if
7 they give us this data, they' re the client, you know, they' re
8 the ones that ' s going to do the testing and they said this is
9 the results , we would not separately require certified data
10 from a --
11 Q So you rely on the city in providing the
12 appropriate - -
13 A Yes , absolutely. And these are licensed operators
14 that are licensed to do that type of testing. They do it
15 every day as part of their job . So yeah, we would not
16 require separate certified - -
17 Q So you don' t do that separately?
18 MR. HAMNER: Unless it ' s the state calls for it .
19 A Unless -- yeah, h, the specifications call for it or
20 require it or that type of thing . But like I said, often
21 times we ' ll work with the operators at the plant and they' ll
22 verify with the data themselves and they have the lab - - you
23 know, many of these - - a lot of these have their own
24 laboratory testing. You know, each city have the basic
25 supplies that for us, you know, certified operators , that
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 55
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 data is fine .
2 Q During the process of certification what ' s -- and I
3 apologize, I ' m not an engineer.
4 A Okay. No problem.
5 Q What would -- using this plant as the example, of
6 course, what would be the steps involved, like, okay, the
7 plant is done, we ' re throwing the switch? So what would
8 CPH ' s role be at that point?
9 A Typically, what would happen is that you go through
10 a start-up process . So you would have the manufacturers
11 there, the contractors there . The contractor would typically
12 run the facility, not the city. So the contractors are
13 typically are going to start up the plant , they' re going to
14 run it, they' re going to have their manufacturers there, you
15 know, typically at that point, you know, it ' s still the
16 contractor' s plans . So the city hasn' t taken responsibility
17 for it, he has to prove that it works . That it meets the
18 specifications . Yeah, so he goes through that start-up
19 process . You know, does he work with the city and they do
20 some of the testing, very possible . Do they have some of the
21 certified labs . It ' s possible . You know, that could be
22 required. But basically, it ' s the contractor ' s job to prove
23 that it the facility is meeting it ' s specifications through
24 that start-up process . Once that ' s completed, and you get
25 through that, then there ' s training with the operator. The
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 56
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 city will take over that facility, you know, and than the
2 city is then responsible for the operation and maintenance
3 going forward typically. And there maybe - - like, you know,
4 when we do -- when we ' re getting ready to do a plant start-up
5 on a big waste water plant , there ' s a 14-day operational
6 test . So the contractor has to completely run this waste
7 water facility for 14 days , you know, the city will be there,
8 we ' ll be there, you know, everybody will be there to make
9 sure it ' s meeting it ' s requirements and everything is
10 functioning in accordance with the plant specifications and
11 then after that 14-day period, then the city will come over
12 and take over. I 'm not sure of what the requirements of the
13 specs are, you know, but that ' s typically the type of thing
14 that ' s required, is that you require the operator to prove
15 that that facility is meeting plans and specifications .
16 Q So CPH' s role at that point, would be more of a
17 consulting should something come up?
18 A Yeah, essentially we would monitor, you know, we
19 would - - we would - - along with the city, we would monitor
20 the - - the operations , we would monitor together with the
21 city, you know, to make sure that it ' s complying with the
22 specifications . You know, and once that ' s completed, we - -
23 you know, like I said, we ' re not running it . The contractor
24 is operating the facility and then once that ' s completed, you
25 know, then we would, certify it after we witnessed the
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 57
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 start-up testing.
2 Q And then you mentioned 14 days , is that kind of
3 standard?
4 A No, that ' s a big -- that ' s a very -- that ' s an --
5 that ' s a waste water plant . So typically, probably it could
6 be a thing, you know, it could be less . You wanted a smaller
7 facility, so --
8 Q So on one the size that we ' re working on currently,
9 would that typically logistically take a day or two?
10 A I would think so.
11 Q Okay. Thank you.
12 MR. MCCANN: And Mr. Cannon.
13 BY MR. CANNON:
14 Q Mr. Gierach, I asks a couple of questions of you
15 earlier about had you had any communication with former
16 commissioners , have you had any communications with any of
17 the commissioners seated up here today including myself
18 regarding this plant?
19 A No, sir.
20 Q Not before? Okay. And did you have some
21 communication with Kevin Smith, our former city manager,
22 because he -- if I recall correctly, when he came in and
23 spoke with us in September he said that he had a conversation
24 with you about the plant and that you would stand behind your
25 work or some words to that , and I ' m paraphrasing -- but - -
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 58
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 A I - - I don' t specifically remember talking about
2 the facility. I do remember we talked a little bit about his
3 testimony. I saw him at my daughter ' s Clean Juice - - when
4 she use to go to the Clean Juice in Lake Mary. But I do
5 remember that we talked a little bit about his -- but keep in
6 mind that we ' re also consultants for Lake Mary also - -
7 Q Right .
8 A So I would talk to Kevin on a pretty regular basis .
9 Q All right . And then the only other question that I
10 have is that I know that historically our utilities
11 department and city has reached back to CPH when we were
12 having trouble locating plans or some specs from some of the
13 different plants . And that you had documents in your file
14 going back more than just nine or ten years . Would you agree
15 not to purge any of your documentation or files until we can
16 get this matter resolved, in other words , whatever existed
17 from CPH that you will not purge or destroy any of those
18 documents or records that you may have? Are you agreeable to
19 that?
20 MR. HAMNER: They have no reason to deviate from
21 our regular retention policy.
22 MR. CANNON: Yeah, that ' s not the question
23 counselor that I asked him.
24 MR. HAMNER: Yeah. Well , we ' re not going to amke
25 an exception one way or the other.
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 59
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 MR. CANNON: So --
2 MR. HAMNER: There ' s no claim pending. There ' s no
3 litigation holds . There ' s nothing like that . We ' re not
4 going to go delete anything, we ' re also not going to
5 preserve files that we wouldn' t ordinarily preserve .
6 MR. CANNON: I want to hear from you, Mr. Gierach,
7 what is the official document retention policy of the
8 city -- of -- excuse me, of CPH and does the retention
9 periods vary depending on the type of documents that
10 you ' re talkng about?
11 MR. HAMNER: That ' s beyond the scope of your
12 subpoena. our internal record retention is not part of
13 your subpoena .
14 MR. CANNON: Okay. Well , counselor, you just put
15 it in issue because you' re objecting.
16 MR. HAMNER: I 'm answering you ' re question, Mr.
17 Cannon, and I don ' t think that objecting to your
18 question puts anything at issue .
19 BY MR. CANNON:
20 Q Okay. So Mr. Gierach, will you answer my question
21 or if you refuse to answer it I ' ll advise that counsel will
22 certify it and then we ' ll take it up at a later date if we
23 need to . Can you tell me what your document retention policy
24 is at CPH?
25 A No, I cannot tell you.
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 60
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 Q Okay.
2 A I cannot tell you. You can talk to my assistant ,
3 she can tell you, but I do not know what the specific
4 document --
5 Q And will you agree until we can finish talking with
6 Mr. Zodky and, if necessary, Mr. Goutcher. Will you agree
7 not to destroy any documents that you may have in your files
8 at least until these two men can review it if necessary and
9 help answer some questions .
10 MR. HAMNER: We have answered that question.
11 MR. CANNON: I want to hear it from the witness .
12 MR. HAMNER: You don ' t have to hear it from the
13 witness as counsel is advising you, we will follow our
14 normal record retention policy.
15 MR. CANNON: (CQ) Okay. So, Mr. Gierach, are you
16 going to refuse to answer my question on the advice of
17 counsel?
18 MR. GIERACH: I 'm going to do what my counsel tells
19 me --
20 MR. HAMNER: I 'm not telling not to answer the
21 question, I 'm telling you we ' re going to follow our
22 regular record retention policy.
23 MR. GIERACH: We will follow our regular record
24 retention policy.
25 MR. CANNON: Okay.
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 61
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 MR. GIERACH: Whatever that is .
2 BY MR. CANNON:
3 Q (CQ) And to the extent that the records still exist
4 but maybe outside of your normal purge date, will you agree
5 to hold those records until we review them with Mr. Gourtcher
6 and Mr. Zodky?
7 MR. HAMNER: You can ask it ten different ways Mr .
8 Cannon, it ' s the same answer.
9 Q (CQ) Mr. Gierach, your answer, sir.
10 A I will follow my advice of counsel .
11 MR. CANNON: Certify the last three questions and
12 answers please .
13 THE COURT REPORTER: Okay.
14 MR. CANNON: Okay. Thank you. We ' re just trying
15 to get the information. I think you understand that .
16 MR. GIERACH: I understand that .
17 MR. CANNON: And we don' t have direct access to
18 your files . We have access to our files but not -- we
19 don ' t have access to memos or whatever that might be in
20 existence at CPH. We ' re just trying to get to the
21 bottom of this . And it ' s not -- it ' s note meant for any
22 other purpose . And you know, it ' s not meant to be a
23 hostile environment here at all , but we ' re searching for
24 facts and information. Okay?
25 MR. HAMNER: Yeah.
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 62
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 MR . CANNON: Thank you, sir .
2 MR . HAMNER : And, Mr. Cannon, I heard everyone ' s
3 comments before, we ' re not making claims but I have had
4 people try to ask me that about my records retention
5 policy. I have had people try to ask me about our
6 insurance policies , so it sure doesn ' t sound like all of
7 that dovetails together. And as counsel for my client ,
8 I certainly have to protect the bare interest as well .
9 And when you start saying things about asking about
10 insurance and records retention policies , those sure are
11 litigation words in my world. So we ' re not trying to be
12 difficult either, we ' re trying to cooperate . This is a
13 project that ' s nine or ten years old, all right? And
14 you ' re asking us to dig back and talk about records that
15 are that old with two people that have retired, one of
16 them has been retired a long, long time .
17 So I think we ' re going to try to do the best we can
18 and we have no interest whatsoever and hiding anything
19 from them city or keeping anything out of the city
20 purview at a proper request and long standing
21 relationship, and I think that Mr. Gierach made it very
22 clear that based on that long standing relationship, any
23 time an intervening period of the start-up of this
24 plant, any one that called and said, Hey, we ' re having
25 trouble here, CPH has almost a 50-year relationship with
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 63
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 the City of Winter Springs , no one is going to ignore
2 that call . Okay. But to come back now nine or ten
3 years later and say, Oh, well , do not purge records and
4 what ' s your insurance policy, put yourself in my shoes ,
5 okay? So we ' re not trying to be difficult either, but
6 at the same time I want to protect the interest of my
7 client .
8 MR . CANNON: I think everybody - - I really
9 genuinely really believe that, Mr. Gierach, your company
10 as well as the city, everybody wants to get the most
11 accurate information and you ' re right it goes back
12 several years and none of our city employees , like Mr.
13 Lotcuff, are not with the city anymore, right? So we ' re
14 trying to - - we asked him to come in and he refused to
15 come appear, which made it more difficult, right? We ' re
16 trying to get records and we ' re trying to talk with you
17 and others to try and piece together what had happened.
18 So thank you .
19 MR . HAMNER : We have made Mr. Gierach available to
20 you, we have and some scheduling issues . We were caught
21 flat footed with these subpoenas . Nobody gave us a
22 phone call , nobody made any informal calls . Nobody
23 tried to reach out to CPH and say, Hey, can we talk
24 about this? All of a sudden a subpoena shows up out of
25 nowhere and so since that time, we have been trying to
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 64
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 schedule this properly. This was the earliest time we
2 could get . And Mr. Zodky, when he ' s available, he ' ll be
3 available if you need to talk to him. I don ' t know
4 about Mr. Goutcher, he ' s not been on the list of people
5 to subpoena at all . So --
6 MR. MCCANN: We ' ll move one . Commissioner Elliott .
7 BY MR. ELLIOT :
8 Q David, would it be safe to say that over a period
9 of years the water quality in Lake Jesup could have possibly
10 changed?
11 A Certainly.
12 Q I mean, better or worse, it would change over time,
13 it ' s an open body of water.
14 A Yes , sir.
15 Q I mean, I would guess the same thing. And from
16 what the -- conversation with Commissioner Johnson about
17 these start-up periods and these testing periods before
18 things are certified, it appears to me that these - - the real
19 issue were these filters were clogging up more often than
20 they probably should have and they needed to be back washed
21 more often than they should have and that that issue probably
22 would not have appeared during a start-up period, I 'm
23 guessing at this point , but one of these issues did arise
24 it ' s my understanding that no one from the city ever
25 contacted CPH and said hey these filters are needing to be
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 65
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 back washed more often than not . It ' s clogging more often
2 and then it ' s effecting the performance of the plant . Nobody
3 ever told CPH that, correct?
4 A Not that I ' m aware of .
5 Q Okay. Thank you.
6 MR. MCCANN: Further discussion from the dais?
7 MR. JOHNSON: I just have one . Segway from that .
8 MR. MCCANN: Thank you. Commissioner.
9 BY MR. JOHNSON:
10 Q Did the company that manufactured the filters
11 indicate at any time to you that th city contacted them
12 regarding the problem with the filters clogging up?
13 A Not that I ' m aware of .
14 Q Okay.
15 A I was told that they went out to this site once we
16 contacted them, but that was all that I was made aware of .
17 MR. HAMNER: Just for clarity, that would have been
18 after the October 19th meeting with the new city
19 manager?
20 A That ' s right .
21 Q So that was much later?
22 MR. HAMNER: October 2019 . Yes , sir.
23 Q Okay. Thank you.
24 MR. MCCANN: Further discussion? In that case
25 gentlemen, I would like to thank you for coming in
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 66
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 tonight and spending time with us . The real goal here
2 really is to find out where we are . So in closing for
3 you two gentlemen before we continue, thank you for
4 coming out . Unfortunately, I don ' t really know if we ' re
5 finding more information that we really have had . I
6 think at this point and I ' ll discuss when - - when you
7 stand up and remove yourself . But thank you for coming
8 out . I ' ll leave it at that .
9 MR . GIERACH: Thank you.
10 MR . HAMNER : Thank you.
11 MR . MCCANN: So while the gentlemen step out, if I
12 may just for simply residents a little bit of a re-cap
13 here . This Lake Jesup augmentation plant was put on
14 line in 2013 . There were, to my understanding, the
15 first design issues at the Lake Jesup were set high, so
16 during the low water time period, when we attempted to
17 use those plants , the water could not be brought in for
18 the plant, because the design had set the intakes above
19 the low water line . These plants were never intended to
20 be used as a full-time - - they were meant to augment to
21 or to supplement our water, primarily for Central Winds
22 Park to water the baseball fields at the parks and keep
23 the fields going and then additional water was going to
24 be put into use by our residents . Again, it was
25 supposed to be used during high need times , not year
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 67
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 around use . The second issue came during Lake - - or
2 Hurricane Irma when Lake Jesup flooded and went above
3 the flood plain and wiped out the electrical panels for
4 that plant , causing again substantial problems .
5 The bottom line here is that when the new city
6 manager came on board he was made aware and we were
7 concerned about issues . This dais has now become well
8 aware, we ' re just simply trying to find out how we can
9 move forward. It ' s my understanding that the city staff
10 is working diligently and brought on different engineers
11 to create solutions to these problems . I think we - - if
12 it ' s not inappropriate to speak for myself , the entire
13 dais is just simply concerned about finding out what has
14 happened with 2 . 7 million dollars that ' s being put into
15 our utilities at a point where quite frankly we have a
16 great deal of infrastructure work to be done and that
17 2 . 7 million dollars needs to be justified and we need to
18 get that plant up and working. We understand that we
19 need it and hopefully that will come to fruition . I am
20 optimistic during conversations that I have been apart
21 of that we will get that plant up and going, but we do
22 have a responsibility to our tax payers . And having
23 said that, I ' ll return the conversation back to the dais
24 and Deputy Mayor Cannon.
25 MR . CANNON: Yeah, so Anthony, would you please
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 68
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 send an expoliation of evidence letter to Mr . Hamner and
2 to CPH tomorrow, please, just on that . And then it ' s
3 apparent that Mr . David Gear - - excuse me . It ' s
4 apparent that Mr . Zodky and this William Goutcher, whose
5 name appears on a lot of these applications . We just
6 really need to get these guys in here . I took Gierach
7 at face value . I mean he ' s the president of the
8 company, he wasn ' t the one out there in the field. we
9 need to get these other two in here and - - so we can
10 wrap this up, right? And I mean he started back in
11 September and there ' s been some big - - so if you can get
12 with Mr. Hamner and try to get Zodky in here and then
13 also reach out to Mr . Goutcher, who apparently is local .
14 I think based on everything that I heard and read, these
15 are the two men that ' s going to have the most
16 information and likely would have been the people that
17 could have walked up to or reached out to our city staff
18 if and when these problems were arising, clearly in the
19 unsigned question and answer document purported to have
20 been prepared by Kip Lotcuff . He says that there were
21 problems with the filters and that it wasn ' t working .
22 The through proof wasn ' t there and it had to be bypassed
23 and modifications and so forth. So those are the two - -
24 you know, Mr . Lotcuff through counsel refused to appear,
25 so let ' s - - and Mr . Zodky said that he will be here . so
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 69
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 let ' s get Mr . Zodky in here and Mr . Goutcher and let ' s
2 get this finished up, you know.
3 MR . GARGANESE : The commission voted on subpoenaing
4 Mr . Zodky and I tried to get Mr. Zodky and I tried to
5 coordinate with Mr . Hamner, he wasn ' t available . I gave
6 alternate dates at the end of January and so unless the
7 commission directs otherwise, we can do - - we can try to
8 schedule something for Mr. Zodky. It ' s the first that
9 I ' ve heard that he lives in Colorado . I don ' t know how
10 accessible he is here in Florida . Or alternatively
11 whether you want him to try video .
12 MR . CANNON: Yeah, I mean, we just need to get it
13 - -
14 MR . GARGANESE : - - a video inquiry - -
15 MR . CANNON: Al lot of this stuff that you ' re
16 seeing as I ' m looking through these records that you
17 have, has William Goutcher ' s name on it, he ' s the one
18 that certified the plans , he ' s the one that participated
19 in the design of plans and he ' s - -
20 MR . GARGANESE : I get it , but they were not on the
21 original list - -
22 MR . CANNON: I understand.
23 MR . GARGANESE : If the commission wants to add
24 another person on the subpoena list, I ' ll be happy to
25 issue a subpoena, but you guys tell me what you want to
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 70
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 do .
2 MR . CANNON: I make a motion that we add William
3 Goutcher, the professional engineer, to the list and
4 bring him so that - - he ' s probably going to be in the
5 best position to answer these questions .
6 MR . MCCANN: There ' s the motion, who would be the
7 second?
8 MR . BENTON: I second.
9 MR . MCCANN: The motion is made by Deputy Mayor
10 Cannon, seconded by Commissioner Benton. Christopher - -
11 MR . ELLIOT : Mr . Mayor, can we have a discussion
12 before we go .
13 MR . CANNON: Thank you, I appreciate that .
14 MR . ELLIOT : I want to keep in mind, for a lack of
15 a better term, what the endgame is here . We ' re very
16 knowledgeable at this point of what ' s going on . There
17 has been a lot of mistakes made . There has been some
18 finger pointing, there has been quite a few subpoenas
19 that have been completely ignored and this one could
20 very well be ignored too . I just want to make sure that
21 we, as a commission, know what the endgame is here,
22 which is to kind of get an idea of how this happened.
23 We can ' t reverse it . We need to move forward which we
24 are doing right now with this plant and I ' m really not
25 so sure that brining more witnesses in is really going
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 71
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 to give us a whole lot more information that we really
2 don ' t already know.
3 MR . CANNON: Well , what we don ' t know,
4 Commissioner, is because Kip Lotcuff , the professional
5 engineer of utilities director of 20 years at the city,
6 has refused to honor his subpoena . We don ' t know if
7 there was communcation from the city to CPH. And Mr .
8 Gierach, and I take him at his word, he ' s the president
9 and he - - you know, it ' s not likely that - - the likely
10 people that would have been reached out to would have
11 been Mr. Goutcher and Mr . Zodky. So I don ' t think that
12 it ' s going to take very long . But -- and Mr. Goutcher
13 is a local - - I mean, he lives locally at least that ' s
14 what David told us , that he saw him at UCF games . So I
15 just - - and the reason that I think that ' s important , is
16 if there was a failure on the part behalf of the City
17 staff to communicate to CPH, right? And they didn ' t
18 report to the design engineers had we had a problem with
19 this , that ' s one thing, right? That ' s part of the
20 fixing the system to make sure that it doesn ' t happen
21 again. If it was reported to CPH and they blew it off
22 and they didn ' t help with adding another filter or
23 whatever the fix would be, then that ' s another thing .
24 And that ' s my only rationale for it, I mean.
25 MR . MCCANN: If we can, Commissioner Elliott, you
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 72
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 were trying to - -
2 MR . ELLIOT : Well , I understand what you ' re saying
3 about it Deputy Mayor, but my concern is , is that the
4 endgame is whatever answer we get from these other
5 engineers or that we may or may not have gotten from Mr.
6 Lotcuff, is that really going to change where we go down
7 the road with this process . Do I think right now there
8 was a failure of communication between a whole lot of
9 people in this issue, yes, I think there was . Do I
10 think that the city did or did not make the best
11 decision in choosing the design of this plant, maybe,
12 maybe not . But the bottom line is we have got a plant
13 that doesn ' t work, we need to get it fixed and we ' re
14 probably going to have to do it ourselves . We ' re not - -
15 I don ' t see us getting to a point where we ' re going to
16 be able to get any kind of assistance whether it ' s
17 financial or another type of assistance from any entity
18 out there to assist us with going forward with this
19 process . So I want to make sure that we ' re using our
20 time, the city ' s time, the taxpayer ' s time, to really
21 come to a conclusion that ' s different to the one that I
22 kind of already have right now, which is - - it was a big
23 cluster and it ' s still somewhat of a cluster, but we
24 need to kind of move forward on this process . And take
25 care of what needs to be done .
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 73
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 MR . CANNON: And this is why I wanted to ask the
2 city manager a question, if I may, I 'm not trying to cut
3 you off .
4 MR . ELLIOT : No, that ' s fine .
5 MR . CANNON: We had the prior city manager - - and
6 I ' m paraphrasing, although we could read it out of the
7 transcript , saying that he communicated with David
8 Gierach and that they would stand behind the work, or
9 words to that effect . And I believe that the city
10 manage had a conversation with Mr. Gierach about wuold
11 they help us with the repair of these plants . This one
12 specific plant , did you - -
13 MR . BOYLE : There were two meetings that occurred.
14 And I would have to go back and look at my calendar and
15 see which one occurred first . David and Terry and I and
16 Charles Lacey the former mayor, had a meeting over at
17 the Public House . And that meeting was really around an
18 the change of the commission, the disposition of the
19 commission and CPH trying to retain the city as a client
20 and that really was a an focus .
21 The plant came up in that meeting and I said one of
22 the primary things that the commission should or will be
23 looking into is the functionality of the plant . And at
24 that point , David had said we ' ll work through this , in
25 other words, indicating that they were going to
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 74
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 positively assist the city in figuring out what was
2 going on with the plant . There was a second meeting
3 with myself, Aleena Rivera, which is the prior - - she
4 was the utility director between Kip Lotcuff , and the
5 current - - Jason, the current director with Terry and
6 David, which I have somewhat aggressively in that
7 meeting, that was held here at City Hall , pointed out
8 the fact that the communication center of the plant,
9 which were really the control panels were replaced too
10 close to the lake and I specifically remember David
11 actually saying, probably not the best place for it, but
12 you know we could have moved it up the hill on the
13 actual back wall of the plant would have been safer.
14 And I also brought up some concerns about - - in
15 2000 - - roughly in 2015 , we had a similar drought
16 condition that we had back in the Spring of 2021 . And
17 what happened was that the intake box that was out on
18 the pier, on the end of the concrete pier that we built
19 was actually high and dry. So right at the precise time
20 that we needed the water, it couldn ' t suction any of the
21 water off of Lake Jesup . And so he - - he said of course
22 - - and at that time, we didn ' t know to the extent of the
23 - - and I will use different words because I think
24 they ' re important . They were efficient, but they
25 weren ' t effective . They were efficient at removing the
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 75
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 biological mater out of the lake but they weren ' t
2 effective because they couldn ' t continue to run. So
3 it ' s an important distinction. And at that point we
4 didn ' t know exactly what was going on with those filters
5 because the panel had been - - it had basically exploded
6 because it was under water and we had to pay
7 approximately $60 , 000 to repair that . So at that point
8 what we were doing is trying to get all of the
9 components between the lake and the actual filters up
10 and running before we could test to figure out what was
11 going. But we indicated that in the meeting . And
12 again, David looked at me and he ' s a very honest guy he
13 said. Shawn we ' ll work through it, we ' ll figure out
14 what ' s going on with it and we ' ll take care of it
15 together and I said, okay. Fine . And than the meeting
16 concluded.
17 MR . CANNON: And because of that is the reason why
18 I ' m saying this . If they had blown us off from day one
19 and said, You know, we ' re not going to help you, then I
20 would have - - then I wouldn ' t be inclined to take the
21 - - you know, to take the interview Mr. Goutcher,
22 interview Mr . Zodky and that ' s really where I ' m coming
23 from. If they had just said you ' re on your own, you
24 know then I would be more inclined to agree with you,
25 Mr . Elliott .
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 76
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 MR . MCCANN: Commissioner Benton, you were up next .
2 MR . BENTON: I ' m not sure if this has to do with
3 whether or not we should subpoena the gentleman, so I
4 would like to wait until after we discuss this and - -
5 MR . MCCANN: And Commissioner Johnson .
6 MR . JOHNSON: It seems to me that our key
7 individuals that we need to hear from are Terry Zodky
8 and Kip Lotcuff . Well , Mr . Lotcuff has made it clear
9 his stance . My question would be to the city attorney,
10 would it be feasible for us to submit questions to Terry
11 Lotcuff [sic . ] out in Colorado or wherever he ' s at , and
12 ask that he respond to those questions . Is that a
13 method? You had mentioned perhaps a Zoom meeting I
14 guess of some sort , but - - I personally would like to
15 hear from him. The other fella I honestly don ' t think
16 he ' s a player. I think your key players are these two
17 gentlemen. Kip we have heard from or at least he ' s
18 provided a statement . I would like to hear something
19 from Terry Lotcuff [sic . ] , but I don ' t know what the - -
20 MR . MCCANN: Zodky - - Terry Zodky.
21 MR . JOHNSON: Terry Zodky. But would it be logical
22 approach to this - - you have tried to reach them without
23 success, but is there another avenue that we could go?
24 MR . GARAGNESE : Well , I ' m working through his
25 Attorney, Mr . Hamner, so I can contact him and try to
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 77
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 schedule Mr. Zodky and see if he ' s going to be here in
2 Florida and he ' s accessible or provide some other
3 alternative, whether it be a Zoom call or maybe a
4 combination Zoom call and maybe some advanced
5 questionings from the commission whether it be - -
6 whether we would be able to do t that way.
7 MR . JOHNSON: Because quite frankly, I did a lot of
8 homework, but all of my questions were really geared
9 towards him. And I think if - - you know, if we could
10 just submit questions to him out in Colorado, if he ' s
11 willing to respond to them, at least that ' s something.
12 My sense is that we ' re - - other than that we ' re not
13 going to hear from him.
14 MR . CANNON: Okay.
15 MR . JOHNSON: So I guess there ' s a couple of
16 avenues that we could take, right?
17 MR . GARGANESE : Sure .
18 MR . MCCANN: All right . Commissioner Elliott?
19 MR . ELLIOT : I withdrew.
20 MR . MCCANN: And Commissioner Hale .
21 MS . HALE : I do think that we do need to wrap this
22 up and get going . I ' m not disagreeing with that
23 because, we kind of know what going on - - but I have
24 seen such a failure of the communication and the back
25 and forth that I think that the people that worked hand
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 78
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 in hand on this project, is where we ' re going to get our
2 answers for what they - - you know, what things we need
3 to put in place to make sure that this doesn ' t happen
4 again in the future with other projects . You know - - so
5 I mean, I have - - I do think that we need to talk to
6 these people with - - if they ' ll talk to us , I think we
7 need to find out how they can get better systems in
8 place so that this doesn ' t happen on any project in the
9 future . My opinion .
10 MR . MCCANN: Deputy Mayor Cannon.
11 MR . CANNON: Yeah, Anthony, we could just do a
12 telephone . We can do it over the telephone to have
13 somebody go and put them under oath there at his home .
14 We don ' t even need it on Zoom, you know, and that will
15 make it much simpler to schedule and if his attorney
16 wants to come here or wants to be on the conference
17 call , whatever it doesn ' t matter, but - - and the same,
18 we don ' t - - and in like none of these when we hand in a
19 bunch of documents or anything, so let ' s just do - - they
20 testify all the time in court, right? In depositions .
21 So why don ' t we do it that way and just get it - -get
22 these guys scheduled, that ' s easy and you know we have
23 the hook up here and just have a court reporter out
24 there and have one here and just do it . I mean that ' s
25 even easier than Zoom.
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 79
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 MR . GARGANESE : That ' s fine . I ' ll contact Mr.
2 Hamner . I ' ll say, you know, the commissioners said that
3 he doesn ' t have to be physically present and try to get
4 it on the calendar .
5 MR . CANNON: Yes . And I mean, as far as the
6 advanced questions they already know what the questions
7 are because they ' re getting the transcripts . I mean,
8 they know kind of what we ' re going to be asking, but my
9 experience has been, you need to be able ask that and
10 follow-up, right? Because then they' ll say something
11 and then you ' ll want to able to follow-up and say can
12 you explain that or what about this or what about that .
13 I want to get this done . I ' m not personally happy that
14 it ' s been a four-month hiatus since we started this in
15 September. And if the problem has been a scheduling
16 problem, then we probably should have just said, do it
17 by telephone, I don ' t care . You know, but we just need
18 to finish it up and - - uh, if you look through all of
19 these permits and all of the applications and the
20 certificate of construction that was signed it was all
21 by William Goutcher, he ' s the one that signed off on it,
22 the permits from St . John ' s, he ' s the one who signed off
23 on the DEP permits . He ' s the one that did the
24 certifications . So that ' s the only reason why I ' m
25 bringing him and his name up because until I recently
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 80
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 got these documents from the clerk Friday, I didn ' t even
2 know who he was really, but - - and I don ' t see Terry ' s
3 name in there . So frankly, Mr . Goutcher might be the
4 better way to go . He might be the man that answers the
5 most questions . I don ' t know.
6 MR . MCCANN: Commissioner Johnson .
7 MR . JOHNSON: From my understanding, it sound like
8 they signed off on this thing in a day and maybe in an
9 afternoon - -
10 MR . CANNON: Well , we don ' t know.
11 MR . JOHNSON: Yeah, I don ' t know. But going back
12 to the motion, I would support the motion with the
13 understanding that alternative methods are available for
14 them to help us out . So I think it was a motion was
15 moved forward and seconded and I think given the
16 circumstances, I think both gentlemen need to be reached
17 out to .
18 MR . CANNON: And we can make it - - I ' m about making
19 it easy on them too, right? So that ' s the easiest for
20 them because they can just sit at home or they can sit
21 at their attorneys office or whatever. If they want to
22 come in, fine . If they want to do it by phone that ' s
23 okay too . I didn ' t know that Mr. Zodky was out in
24 Colorado . That would explain the difficulties .
25 MR . GARGANESE : I was not not aware until tonight
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 81
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 that he was out in Colorado .
2 MR . CANNON: Yeah, let ' s just do it by phone and
3 let ' s just get these done and be finished with it .
4 MR . JOHNSON: Yeah, let ' s wrap it up .
5 MR . CANNON: I want to wrap it up . It would have
6 been easier, frankly, if Mr. Lotcuff would come in
7 because he would have been the most knowledgeable about
8 the operations and everything. But his attorney
9 instructed him to disregard the subpoena, so it is what
10 it is .
11 MCCANN: So then Deputy Mayor, if you could restate
12 your motion.
13 MR . CANNON: All right . I ' ll do that . I make a
14 motion that we subpoena William Goutcher and Terry Zodky
15 and that we offer for the conveniences of the witnesses
16 that they can testify telephonically or by Zoom or
17 whatever they prefer, but telephonically - - whatever is
18 easiest for them and that we - - and that our city
19 attorney basically to reach out to Mr. Hamner and say,
20 we have got to get these done, because it ' s been four or
21 five months now and we just need to wrap this up .
22 MR . MCCANN: So the motion is to reissue a subpoena
23 and asks for a new type of communication by exactly
24 whom?
25 MR . CANNON: We just don ' t need to resubpoena Mr.
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 82
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 Zodky, I don ' t think . Do we, Anthony?
2 MR . GARGANESE : The way that I handled it was that
3 I re-subpoenaed Mr . Hamner and he said that he wouldn ' t
4 accept the subpoena on behalf of this clients, but as
5 far as I know Mr . Goutcher as of tonight , is not his
6 client . So we would have to locate him and Mr. Goutcher
7 and figure out - -
8 MR . CANNON: Well , reach out to Mr. Hamner and see .
9 I ' m pretty sure he ' s going to - - but in any event, so
10 the motion is that we take testimony from William
11 Goutcher and Terry Zodky and if that requires a subpoena
12 for Mr . Goutcher, fine . Anthony, are you sure that Mr.
13 Hamner will produce it . And offer at their convienience
14 telephonic, Zoom, but we just want them to get this
15 wrapped up .
16 MR . MCCANN: Looking for a second.
17 ME . HALE : Second.
18 MR . MCCANN: Okay. The motion is made by Deputy
19 Mayor Cannon and seconded my Commissioner Cannon [sic . ] ,
20 any further discussion?
21 MR . CANNON: Commissioner Hale seconded it .
22 MR . MCCANN: I ' m sorry.
23 MR . CANNON: I made the motion and it was seconded
24 by Hale .
25 MR . MCCANN: I ' m sorry if I stated it wrong . I was
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 83
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 thinking of you. So the motion is made by Deputy Mayor
2 Cannon and seconded by Commissioner Hale . If I got that
3 wrong the first time, my apologies , for the record. Any
4 further discussion? Seeing none . Christian - -
5 MR . GOWAN: Commissioner Benton.
6 MR . BENTON: Aye .
7 MR . GOWAN: Deputy Mayor Cannon?
8 MR . CANNON: Aye .
9 MR . GOWAN: Commissioner Johnson?
10 MR . JOHNSON: Aye .
11 MR . GOWAN: Commissioner Hale?
12 MS . HALE : Aye .
13 MR . GOWAN: Commissioner Elliott?
14 MR . ELLIOT : Nay.
15 MR . MCCANN: The motion passes .
16 Okay. Is there any further discussion on this
17 topic for this evening? I do see Commissioner Benton .
18 MR . BENTON: Yeah. If you hear something often
19 enough be it a truth or a lie, you ' ll start to believe
20 it . And I heard tonight a couple times in previously
21 that this plant was only designed to water Central Winds
22 Park . Every - - all of my history of reading up to then,
23 that is not what it was to designed for. It was
24 designed to augment and that means being able to supply
25 more water than our reclamation facilities could, a lot
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 84
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 more water and possibly even supply it to other areas .
2 that was the initial design according to what I read.
3 If that changed, we have no documentation of it .
4 MR . MCCANN: And just for clarification, it ' s my
5 understanding that the first case was to Central Winds
6 Park and then the secondary use was to people ' s homes .
7 is that city - -
8 MR . BENTON: Excuse me . Excuse me . I ' m still
9 talking. Excuse me - -
10 MR . MCCANN: No, no . Pardon me .
11 MR . BENTON: Respectfully. But the distribution
12 system not being built , see that was what? The plant
13 was designed to feed out to this - - to have enough water
14 that you could feed to the plants - - the reclamation
15 plants and then augment back and be able to feed out
16 more water to our city. Those pipes were never laid in
17 the ground. So whether we didn ' t produce the water
18 because we didn ' t have the pipes or we didn ' t put the
19 pipes because we didn ' t have the water, but that as the
20 initial design . And unless I 'm mistaken and if someone
21 can correct that , and have some documentation to back it
22 up, please do .
23 MR . CANNON: And I think we maybe saying the same
24 thing in different ways . And if we can get an answer
25 from the city manager, can you explain the actual use
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 85
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 and priority of use, just for the record for the Lake
2 Jesup augmentation plant .
3 MR . BOYLE : Sure . It was to feed into the totality
4 of the reclaimed water supply to the entire city. The
5 Central Winds Park consumes on a bad day - - and I say,
6 "Bad" , for water conservation purposes , about 300 , 000
7 gallons . That ' s with all of the - - the zones going
8 about all the water that that field - -all the fields
9 could take . So I 'm not sure why somebody would build a
10 2 million gallon plant - - 2 million per day plant for a
11 need of 300 , 000 . So if you read through a lot of the
12 information that they produced, it was to feed the
13 totality of the reclaimed system as the city built out .
14 And it is still going to be needed to some degree in the
15 future for that purpose . There is a reason why they
16 focused on talking about the water feeding the park.
17 So you guys will have to dig into that and you ' ll
18 find your answers .
19 MR . MCCANN: And if I may, one final follow-up
20 question would be, is it the infrastructure, is the
21 piping there for to supply residents?
22 MR . BOYLE : We have about 1400 customers on
23 reclaimed. And this plant feeds and can back feed both
24 the systems on the east and the west side . Jason can
25 tell you sitting in the audience, but Jason can tell you
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 86
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 specifically where it feeds, but it can feed the
2 existing customer base indirect through some of these
3 storage tanks .
4 MR . MCCANN: Okay. Anything else before we move
5 on? Commissioner Benton, thank you for the
6 clarification. Because I was a bit confused on that and
7 the priority. Thank you for that . Deputy Mayor Cannon.
8 MR . CANNON: I agree with you, Commissioner Benton,
9 and I have carefully studied these permits and so forth,
10 and we are extending the reuse lines in the Tuscawilla
11 Crossings and in other areas now, right? That ' s in the
12 works . And perhaps the reason why they wanted to just
13 focus on Central Winds Park is because they thought that
14 they could get away with but substandard water at
15 Central Winds Park and not in people ' s front and
16 backyards . And that ' s my suspiscion because based on
17 what I have seen here, and that CDM Smith report , it was
18 not performing - - it was not performing as it was
19 required to under the permits . and so there ' s - - and I
20 agree with you Commissioner Elliott, there is lot of
21 layers here . I just - - I think you - - and I understand
22 your concern, I want to be done with this . If simply
23 doing this by telephone testimony, we could have gotten
24 this done three months ago, you know, for the
25 convenience of everybody. But we need to finish this
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 87
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 up . And if you buy - - if a farmer buys a million dollar
2 irrigation pump, when they ' re going to need to irrigate
3 their crops, which they don ' t have to do all of the
4 time, but then doesn ' t buy the irrigation sprinklers and
5 pipes to hook up to the pump . Well , what have you got?
6 You ' ve got a million dollar pump . If a farmer buys a
7 pump that needs to put out 700 gallons a minute, but
8 it ' s only capable of a couple hundred - - 300 gallons a
9 minute, well he didn ' t get what he paid for. And so if
10 the taxpayers of Winter Springs have about 2 . 7 million
11 dollars in this plant that was suppose to filter water
12 at a certain rate and was suppose to pump the water out
13 at a certain rate and by all appearances , it wasn ' t
14 performing, then why did that happen and how do we fix
15 it? And you know, and I don ' t mean just the plant
16 itself because the engineers put - - you know, if we have
17 employees of the city that know that there is a problem
18 like this and don ' t bring it to the attention of the
19 city manager and don ' t - - Kevin Smith said that he was
20 unaware of any problems and said that the plant worked
21 fine . And the prior city engineer, Brian Fields, said
22 that he had nothing to do with the plant and I 'm looking
23 through documents that he ' s got signatures and he ' s got
24 - - as this plant was brought before the commission for
25 approval , he ' s the one presenting the project together
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 88
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 with Kip Lotcuff . So in any event, bottom line here is
2 a lot of money was paid by the taxpayers of this plant
3 and I would hope that CPH would work with us and maybe
4 help us with some engineering of any kind to try and
5 make it right . Because I think that ' s their MO, that ' s
6 the kind of company that I think they' ve always been .
7 And I just - - the reuse line extension, we 've had sewer
8 plants that have not been producing adequate quality
9 affluent reused water that meets the TSS standards that
10 was going into spray fields, right? Because it ' s a
11 lesser criteria, I believe, right, Shawn?
12 MR . BOYLE : For the record, any water that ' s
13 substandard, goes into what we call our reject ponds and
14 it ' s not redistributed anywhere .
15 MR . CANNON: Even the - -
16 MR . BOYLE : And then later on it ' s pumped back
17 through the waste water treatment plant and brought up
18 to the specs . But I will tell you that , again, Jason is
19 behind me, but for many months we have been producing
20 unbelievably good water.
21 MR . CANNON: So I guess the point I 'm making here
22 - -
23 MR . GOWAN: If you want to extend the meeting - -
24 MR . CANNON: Motion to extend.
25 MR . MCCANN: Motion to extent meeting unitl
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 89
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 completion and public input . Motion made my Deputy
2 Mayor Cannon, seconded by Commissioner Hale . All in
3 favor?
4 COLLECTIVE : Aye .
5 MR . CANNON: So along the same lines, if the
6 filters - - and Jason you can clarify this, but if the
7 filters, whether it ' s at the waste water sewage plant or
8 the filters here on this Lake Jesup plant, if they ' re
9 not working optimally, what do you have to do? It ' s
10 back flushing, you ' re not getting the performance, you ' re
11 spending a lot of extra money and electricity pumping
12 and pumping and refiltering and so forth. So that ' s an
13 engineering thing, but I do think that we had clearly,
14 as Commissioner Benton pointed out , the city had a
15 multi-year plan to extend the reuse lines every other
16 year, a 14 -year plan, seven phases every two years to
17 extent reuse into different neighborhoods .
18 We may need to revisit that, because it ' s David
19 now. That was done definitively because of our
20 declining cup . And our need to maximize irrigation with
21 reused water rather than pulling water out of the
22 aquifer. And if that means extending some reuse lines
23 in certain areas like we ' re doing with Tuscawilla
24 Crossings, then I think as a commission we need to
25 address that .
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 90
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 MR . MCCANN: And Commissioner Hale .
2 MS . HALE : That was from earlier, I was going to
3 extend the meeting .
4 MR . MCCANN: Oh, thank you. Is there any further
5 discussion?
6 MR . GARGANESE : Deputy Mayor indicating that - - to
7 send them an expoliation letter to CPH, I don ' t know if
8 that ' s the direction of the commission to do that .
9 MR . MCCANN: Is that something that we should vote
10 on?
11 MR . CANNON: Do you want to explain what it is?
12 MR . GARGANESE : Well , it ' s a litigation hold or a
13 preservation letter. It ' s a letter that you - -
14 MR . MCCANN: To preserve documents?
15 MR . GARGANESE : A party will send it in
16 anticipation of litigation, but also it also could be
17 done in the course of an official investigation asking
18 the party to preserve relative documents pertaining to
19 the subject matter . In this case, the investigation.
20 MR . MCCANN: Commissioner Elliott .
21 MR . ELLIOT : I really don ' t have a problem with the
22 expoliation letter, other than the fact that it just
23 pushes us more towards kind of a negative relationship
24 with our former contractor, with CPH . David seemed very
25 cooperative . He seemed to indicate as Shawn mentioned,
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 91
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 that CPH maybe willing to help us out, but listening the
2 some of the responses from counsel on certain questions,
3 I can see that he is very concerned and I truly believe
4 that if we send an expoliation letter we ' re - - we could
5 be effecting detrimentally this relationship with --
6 that we have with CPH. I really do believe that they' re
7 trying to be a good corporate citizen and do what ' s
8 right . Even if they don ' t believe that it ' s something
9 that they did wrong, it sounded like they maybe wanted
10 to maybe assist, especially after conversations that
11 they had with the city manager . So I 'm not going to say
12 that I 'm against expoliation letter, but in my line of
13 business and Deputy Mayor ' s line of business , those
14 letters they ' re not necessarily looked at in a poisitive
15 fashion.
16 MR . CANNON: Anthony, what if we just simply say,
17 will you hold on to your records until we interview Mr .
18 Goutcher and Mr. Zodky? That way they have access to
19 them if they needed it and not really specify that we ' re
20 looking to ramp up litigation or anything like that, but
21 there might be some records or documents that those men
22 will need to refresh their memories . And that we would
23 request that they not, you know, purge anything until
24 that time . And then that way it takes the sting out of
25 it . Because I agree, I was kind of floored that the
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 92
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 attorney, Mr . Hamner, kid of said what he said, you
2 know, because I think that , frankly, Mr . Zodky - - or
3 excuse me . Mr . Gierach would have been fine with it .
4 But the attorney was like, well - - so maybe try it that
5 way, you know, kind of a soft, you know - -
6 MR . MCCANN: So you ' re saying make the records
7 available to those two former employees of theirs?
8 MR . CANNON: Yeah, not just - - not to purge the
9 records until we 've had the opportunity to, you know,
10 interview Mr . Goutcher and Mr. Zodky basically. And
11 then that way, just say it may be a benefit for them to
12 refresh their memory and there maybe some additional
13 information that they would like to look up - - and just
14 soften it . Because I ' m not - - I mean, we ' ve not made a
15 claim against them - - I mean, that ' s - -
16 MR . GARGANESE : I can send him an email at the
17 direction of the commission - -
18 MR . CANNON: Yeah.
19 MR . MCCANN: Commissioner Hale .
20 MS . HALE : City Manager, Boyle . City Manager,
21 Boyle .
22 MR . BOYLE : Oh, I ' m sorry. I have a hard time
23 hearing you.
24 MS . HALE : What is your opinion on how this could
25 affect our relationship with CPH?
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 93
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 MR . BOYLE : These proceedings?
2 MS . HALE : By - -
3 MR . ELLIOT : Expoliation letter .
4 MR . BOYLE : Well , there ' s a normal cycle to the
5 engineering selection process and I think that CPH had
6 been around for a long time . They have been on the
7 engineering, they just didn ' t - - they weren ' t selected
8 - - actually what number were they? Number 4? They were
9 in the top five and we only went with the top three . so
10 they were still pretty highly ranked. So the point that
11 I ' m trying to make is, it would be behoovent upon them
12 and the commission to moderate the track so that in the
13 future they can still come back and be the engineer on
14 the record for some projects in the future . So as you
15 know we have an enormous project that ' s about to be bid
16 out . There ' s nothing precluding them because it doesn ' t
17 fit under these continuing services contracts to
18 maintain a relationship because my understanding, to my
19 dismay, that the engineering fees on these projects are
20 going to be very, very large and there ' s going to be a
21 lot of companies trying to bid for that . So I think
22 it ' s a reciprocal relationship that needs to be
23 maintained because when we put that out for RP we ' re
24 going to have independent people choosing those
25 engineers . So did that - -
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 94
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 MS . HALE : Yeah. Will it hurt our relationship, to
2 push this through to have them maintain the records .
3 MR . BOYLE : I don ' t know.
4 MR . JASON: I don ' t know that it would help . Their
5 attorney made it clear that they ' re going to maintain
6 their normal retention policy. He stated the fact
7 numerous times . So I don ' t know how hard we want to
8 push at this point , I guess is what I ' m saying .
9 MS . HALE : Even for a soft request - -
10 MR . MCCANN: If I may, Commissioner, if you ' re
11 finished. It sounds to me that there are two different
12 - - there are two different requests . Either hold
13 records, maintain records until these two gentlemen have
14 a - - and that ' s - - so for legal terms, I 'm not the
15 attorney in the dais , but for legal terms, once you send
16 a notice that records must be kept , that is a sign to an
17 organization that a lawsuit could be potentially there .
18 if we say instead of keep these records until they have
19 a chance and we would change it to would you please make
20 these records, please keep them so that these two
21 gentlemen can look at them. Instead of saying, keep
22 them until they have time to look at them, which also
23 means, "We" , still have time to make a decision about
24 potential liable - - litigation, instead say simply, hold
25 it for them. Does that make sense? Is there a
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 95
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 difference there or am I not being an attorney and
2 missing the mark completely?
3 MR . GARGANESE : Well , if it ' s an expoliation letter
4 it ' s written a certain way and with potential sanctions
5 for somebody destroying evidence, if it becomes
6 necessary to produce that evidence in an official
7 proceeding like a court case . So that ' s one and you
8 know, the soft peddling of an email , I would be happy to
9 write that , but I think as Jason said, I - - I don ' t know
10 if it ' s any different than what they already said,
11 right? There isn ' t anything that needs to be said. The
12 already said that they had records and that they will
13 make them available to refresh Mr Goutcher ' s
14 recollection, if necessary or Mr . Zodky, you know, I
15 don ' t know. Whatever the commission wants to do .
16 MR . MCCANN: Okay. Commissioner Benton.
17 MR . BENTON: My opinion on it is that if we soft
18 peddle it, we might as well not do it at all . That ' s
19 just my opinion. I ' m not a legal expert , nor a city
20 official , but if someone were to send something like
21 that to a company that I was with, they might be soft
22 peddling it, they may decide that maybe I should get rid
23 of something . I hate to say that , but it ' s true . We
24 either should or shouldn ' t and that ' s just the desicion
25 that I would make . That ' s just my opinion .
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 96
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 MR . MCCANN: And - - and Deputy Mayor Cannon .
2 MR . CANNON: Yeah. You know, the attorney made it
3 very clear that he was - - they weren ' t going to deviate
4 from their records retention of course they wouldn ' t
5 tell us what that is . Okay. So we don ' t know - - it
6 would have been a lot easier if they would have said,
7 yeah, we keep the records . And I know for a fact, our
8 city has reached out to CPH and gotten records that are
9 10 , 20 years old, 30 year old. So - - but those - - you
10 know - - I ' m not trying to create animosity with the
11 contractor at all , I 'm rally not . And I think that they
12 will have opportunities to continue to bid. I mean,
13 they did work within the last year or two, several
14 things for us . The screen, the inlet screens and
15 several other things , so it ' s not like we ' re
16 blackballing CPH because we have not . And I want them
17 - - you know, I think that through that bidding process a
18 lot of times you get better prices , right? So I don ' t
19 want to dis-way them from going forward bidding on
20 what ' s going to be a lot of different engineering
21 projects going forward.
22 It would have been a lot easier if Mr. Lotcuff
23 would have just come in because he probably had more
24 knowledge than all of them combined. As from the
25 operations standpoint, from the bypass and all the rest
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 97
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 of it and had his attorney not instructed him not to
2 answer that it would have been a little easier . We
3 probably would have been done in one night with him and
4 that would have answered the remaining questions , but it
5 is , what it is . So I don ' t know maybe I ' ll just - - I
6 don ' t know what the sense of the commission is . If
7 you ' re not - - I ' m not trying to push a bad angle here
8 I ' m really not . But you know - -
9 MR . MCCANN: Commissioner Benton.
10 MR . BENTON: My only thinking after he made the
11 request is that the information that they would have, I
12 don ' t suspect would incriminate them, if what he said
13 was true tonight , they may have even suggested to our
14 city staff and whoever they talked to paid a better plan
15 than what was actually done . We don ' t know the reasons
16 why that might not have been done . There is a number of
17 reasons why we would want to have access to that
18 information and whoever answered our questions before,
19 whether it would be over the telephone or in person,
20 they would want to have access to that information
21 because it might - - it has been a few years ago .
22 Their employees or former employees should probably
23 have access to that I would hope . And I don ' t know I if
24 we should do something official to make that happen or
25 not . I don ' t know.
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 98
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 MR . MCCANN: Deputy Mayor Cannon.
2 MR . CANNON: Yeah, you know, going back and looking
3 at all the minutes . In July of 2011 the final
4 engineering and site plans and aesthetic review pans
5 were bought before the commission as Item 502 and there
6 were concerns raised by Perez and other commissioners
7 about the appearance of this plant down on Lake Jesup .
8 and so they made some revisions I guess to it, aesthetic
9 improvements to the tune of 58 , 000 . And then they
10 brought it back on August 27 and then it was approved.
11 But I guess the point that I 'm trying to make is ,
12 that it may well be that the better maxi flow or Active
13 Flow System was proposed and because of aesthetics and
14 because of the size of the plant it was rejected by the
15 prior commission . I don ' t know that but it might have
16 been . I don ' t know. It ' s not in the minutes but
17 certainly Mr . Lotcuff would have known about it . And
18 certainly CPH Mr . Zodky or Goutcher, would have probably
19 said, Well , we recommend this, but you know. So anyway,
20 but - - because yeah, initially there was a design for
21 the filtration and, you know, if the aesthetics were
22 such that they didn ' t want to go with that design, then
23 so - - so be it . That was the wisdom of the commission,
24 Representative Brown and the rest of them in - - back in
25 2011 , when they were making those decisions, so we have
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 99
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 to honor their decision from back then .
2 MR . MCCANN: And it ' s not entirely unreasonable,
3 not that we ' re talking about pickleball courts , and
4 retention meeting space, some big million gallon tank
5 that ' s 30 foot high right there, would - - they may not
6 have foreseen or I assume - - or you have to assume that
7 they did not foresee the problems with this plant . They
8 chose that particular engineer idea, ended up not
9 working, but they were watching out for Lake Jesup and
10 those things and the beautification of our parks .
11 MR . CANNON: Well , we built a plant on our million
12 dollar property, lakefront property. I mean, had I been
13 on the commission back then, I would have said, wait a
14 minute this is our lakefront property, the most that we
15 have in the city, why do we have to put it here?
16 Frankly. Whatever . I don ' t know I have - - and listen I
17 have the benefit now of 12 years later of hindsight that
18 they didn ' t have . But you know, I would - - today, if
19 you Jason or you, Shawn, brought something to us about
20 let ' s put a plan or whatever right there on Lake Jesup,
21 I would say, in that location? You know that ' s like our
22 premo real estate, but whatever.
23 MR . MCCANN: Was there anything that you wanted to
24 add?
25 MR . BOYLE : Sorry, I was playing with the mic .
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 100
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 MR . MCCANN: So we were back to - - the city
2 attorney is asking for direction .
3 MR . CANNON: I ' ll withdraw the suggestion that we
4 do a - - a - - the expoliation of evidence letter only
5 becomes effective if we ' re going through litigation.
6 And I don ' t see that as a liable plan forward right now,
7 based on the information that ' s available . So I 'm just
8 going - - Anthony, do you agree unless you ' re going to go
9 forward with my litigation claim, then we ' ll assert that
10 based on certain records that would move forward. This
11 whole matter has been going on for so long that it ' s - -
12 this dog has got fleas on it and it ' s laying on it ' s
13 side . So I don ' t see this as being a viable litigation
14 claim. I don ' t have all of the information, but not
15 against them.
16 So I ' ll withdraw the suggestion and then make it
17 simple . But I do think that it would be good for you to
18 convey and listen - - make this - - if they make this bit
19 available to Zodky and to Goutcher and let ' s try to get
20 this done quickly, do it by phone, do it however - - you
21 know, let ' s just get it finished. Because it ' s been
22 dragging on now for months . And I ' m not happy with the
23 delays in getting these scheduled, so we just need to
24 get it done .
25 MR . MCCANN: All right . Further discussion .
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 101
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 Commissioner Elliott .
2 MR . ELLIOT : Just real quick, if I look back at the
3 whole reason of going down this path was to find out
4 what happened? Why? How it went wrong? When? Why?
5 and how? And all of that, so we don ' t fall into the
6 same situation in the future or cause these same
7 problems for future commissioners and mayors . There was
8 never any discussion of legal action or pointing fingers
9 and blaming this company or this person. We jsut want
10 to know what happened, why it happened? And so we don ' t
11 do it again. We ' re getting ready to spend a lot of
12 money on waste water treatment plants and we sure don ' t
13 want to do - - in this process what was done in the
14 augmentation process . So ten years later, we 've got
15 commission up here, scratching their heads going, what
16 were those guys doing ten years ago? And that ' s the
17 whole reason from this process and I really don ' t want
18 it to turn adversarial with any of the parties involved
19 even though it seems like it ' s taken that path. You
20 know, she the word subpoena creates that . To throw on
21 something like an expoliation letter or something - - it
22 just - - it ' s just kind of piling on. I just - - like the
23 deputy mayor said, we ' ve been beating this dog for a
24 while and I ' m not sure we ' re going to find out a whole
25 lot more that ' s going to change the final path we take,
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 102
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 which is - - we just don ' t want to repeat mistakes that
2 were made in the past by other entities . That really
3 concerns me . We ' re spending a heck of a lot more money
4 than 2 . 7 million dollars in the very near future, so
5 it ' s a big deal to understand what happened in this
6 situation and just not repeat those mistakes . I would
7 rather keep this as positive as we can and really not
8 create anymore animosity that ' s already been created,
9 especially with CPH.
10 MR . MCCANN: Deputy Mayor .
11 MR . CANNON: Yeah, so just - - I 'm going to share
12 with the commission that I feel that the city needs to
13 adopt through an ordinance or whatever, a requirement
14 that employees of the city whether it be the plant
15 operators or whether it be, you know, department head or
16 whatever, if they know that it ' s a plant and it ain ' t
17 working right, then they an affirmative duty to report
18 it in writing to the department head and to the city
19 manager. And an affirmative duty to report to report
20 it , if you will . And we need to put that in place
21 because there ' s too many - - we know now that people knew
22 full well that these sewer plants were falling apart for
23 years, but the word never got back to the city manager
24 certainly not to me, you know, I 'm prepared to say under
25 oath right now. No city manager until Shawn Boyle
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 103
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 brought it to our attention - - to my attention that the
2 sewer plants were literally crumbling and falling apart .
3 But yet, he was alerted by a city employee, you need to
4 come out and look at these things . So we need to adopt
5 going forward, especially with that these massive
6 projects that we ' re doing. We need to come forward and,
7 Shawn, you probably have already had some thought about
8 this and Jason, across the board, okay, if we bought
9 police cars, and the police officers knew that th radios
10 weren ' t working correctly or the transmissions were bad
11 or whatever, then I would expect that those police
12 officers would bring it to attention of the chief and
13 even bring it to the attention of the city managers .
14 Hey, we just bought these new police cars and they ' re
15 defective, they' re not working . And the same thing with
16 the plants and the same thing with any other big piece
17 of equipment . We buy dump trucks and front-loaders and
18 all of this other equipment . If there ' s a problem, if
19 we didn ' t get the taxpayer ' s value, what we paid for,
20 then there ' s needs to be a requirement that someone
21 speak up through the chain of command, through the
22 department head and through city manager . And that in
23 turn we be briefed on it , Shawn.
24 So have you given some thought to that?
25 MR . BOYLE : I have given it a lot of thought . I
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 104
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 have a lot more insight about the situation and how it
2 occurred and unfolded. Without destroying people ' s
3 careers and licenses and everything in between, I think
4 we have enough information to propose changes in our
5 procurement and our ethics policies about arms length
6 transactions , so that staff remains objective . And that
7 we always keep our fiduciary responsibilities of the
8 focus that employ us , which are the citizens . I think
9 that I have enough information that I - - I 'm very
10 confident that we can prevent these things from
11 happening in the future .
12 MR . CANNON: Okay. Let ' s definitely do it , because
13 I don ' t know. But I get the sense from everybody up
14 here on the dais that we want to make sure that this
15 doesn ' t happen and we ' re about to spend the largest
16 capital program in the history - - probably in the
17 hundred year history of this city. And we can ' t have a
18 repeat of this . You know, I mean, I ' m looking at the
19 commissioning data, and the commissioning data when they
20 fire these plants up, clearly show it wasn ' t needing the
21 specifications it ' s right there . And Mr . Lotcuff - -
22 well , presumably - - purportedly it ' s his statement .
23 It ' s not really his statement because it ' s not signed or
24 anything . But even that document of questions and
25 answers from Lotcuff said, Yeah, the filters worked so
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 105
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 good that they were plugging up constantly and they were
2 back flushing and it wasn ' t working. And that might be
3 the reason that the plant got used so little in an
4 eight-year period of time, because it wasn ' t working
5 correctly. I don ' t know without Mr. Lotcuff coming in,
6 we won ' t know. But I would like if - - if the commission
7 is in agreement, I would like for the city manager to
8 come up with some specific guidelines on this because
9 it ' s common for governmental entities to have these kind
10 of guidelines . Basically, if you know something, then
11 you have to report it and you have to report to your
12 supervisor and supervisor to the city manager. And you
13 know, when it - - when we ' re dealing with these kinds of
14 problems that arise . And inevitably they are going to
15 arise, you know, you might get a copier that doesn ' t
16 work worth a hoot that needs to be returned but you
17 can ' t just sit on it for six months and then the
18 warranty is gone and you can ' t return it . So if you
19 have given some thought to that Shawn, I think we need
20 to - -
21 MR . BOYLE : I have given it a lot of thought . I
22 think we could turn it to the airline industry. And
23 look at the relationship between the pilot and the
24 co-pilot . And I think that we can extrapolate from
25 that . And the policies and procedures that were created
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 106
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 by one of the accidents from back in the 80 ' s or 901s .
2 I think we can extrapolate from that and put a policy in
3 place that would allow plants supervisors, for instance,
4 that run our treatment plants to report around anybody
5 that might not be willing or open to hearing of what the
6 issues are with these type of plants . I know that the
7 police department has that . I think we just need to
8 expand it to the general employees . I think we can
9 definitely work with them with the information that we
10 have and what happened.
11 MR . CANNON: We have dedicated men and women that
12 are employees of this city and they' re the eyes and ears
13 out there day-in and day-out touching things and looking
14 at things . So it they see something, they need to say
15 something. And so you figure it out where it ' s not
16 dually burden some to you and your team. But there
17 needs to - - our employees need to be told. We have the
18 expectation that if they see something that ' s not right
19 and to define it correctly, you know, so not everytime
20 somebody says something inappropriate, you ' re going to
21 get bombarded, but you know, please . I think that - - I
22 was - - I think we need to do that . And that ' s part of
23 why this process is going - - we ' re going through this
24 process .
25 MR . MCCANN: If I might , this commission has made
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 107
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 agreements not to accept campaign contributions or any
2 kind of benefit from any - - any company that does
3 business with the city. And that ' s not always been that
4 way. This is new to this dais we have made a number of
5 other agreements based on ethics . And we need to carry
6 some of that down to some of the decision makers that
7 there were - - they ' re immediate family members and
8 employment with the contractor that ' s doing business
9 with the city and all of those other different things
10 that go on whether there maybe conflict, and all of the
11 those different types of conversations that when on the
12 dais - - and it maybe more difficult with the city
13 employee but anyone who had a - - has a benefit from
14 someone doing business with the city, should be
15 addressed and looked at .
16 Is there any further discussion before we move on
17 to public input? Seeing none . Well , then that brings
18 us back to public input . Right . Okay. And I would
19 remind any one to fill out the blue form and the same
20 rules apply as - - Mr . Gallow your name and address for
21 the record.
22 MR . GALLOW: Good evening . Art Gallow, 199 Indian
23 Terrace and I think everyone knows how much I love and
24 respect everybody on the dais, but tonight I think I
25 have to agree with Commissioner Elliott . Unless it ' s a
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 108
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 big giant pit of gold at the end of this rainbow, I
2 think going further from here is just throwing good
3 money in a bag . I think you have pretty much, most of
4 the information that you ' re going to get . I really
5 can ' t in my mind - - and I was one from the beginning of
6 September that I wanted to get more people in here to
7 find out . So I think life is choices , and I think back
8 than we made our choices . We said okay, we ' re only
9 going to test one for one season . We ' re only going to
10 - - we ' re going to design and put our pot too high, we ' re
11 going to put it on the the lake and we ' re going to make
12 it too low. And do this and do that . I think the city
13 made a bunch of bad choices back then. And there might
14 be a lot of reasons for it . And I would guess that it
15 had something to do with the budget and I was in
16 acquisition when I worked at civil service down at TSD
17 and there ' s federal acquisition regulations that you
18 have find. So if we have problems with the far - - here
19 then training at the minimum is one of them. So I don ' t
20 I think - - I think you ' ll want to reconsider going any
21 further with this . I would think that you should
22 discuss - - what - - where are we going to go from here?
23 what else are we going to find out and what can we
24 possibly do except waste more of the taxpayer money.
25 And and I don ' t want anymore of my money on this .
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 109
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 I think we got - - like Commissioner Elliott said, Okay.
2 take our licks , let ' s move forward. If we got a plan - -
3 I would like to see, my commissioners, my mayor, taking
4 time and fixing it . Let ' s go forward into the future .
5 I would see you spend your time on that than on the past
6 because I don ' t think - - all you got to do is piss a lot
7 of people off hat we ' re going to have to work with and I
8 don ' t think you ' re going to find out anything else . So
9 that ' s my two cents . Thank you.
10 MR . MCCANN: You are appreciated, Mr. Gallow.
11 Anyone else? And as a courtesy we can get you a
12 handheld.
13 MS . BENTON: It ' s Sheila Benton, 414 Seaward Court,
14 in Winter Springs . I have sat here, as you all know,
15 for hours listening and I understand and hear your
16 frustration and someone stonewalling, but as a resident
17 of this city, as you consider your next move, take a
18 look at the comp plan. There is within our comp plan
19 has been updated since 2009 , a conservation element . an
20 element that says, Mr. Developer, when you come into
21 this city, you are required to develop an alternative
22 irrigation system. If you don ' t have the pipes out
23 there for them to look into, where do they hook up to?
24 Potable water. Okay. So now we ' re just working in
25 circular . You ' ve got a piece of the element that says
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 110
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 that you ' re required to do that, but don ' t have tha
2 ability for them to look in. You-all just might want to
3 take a look at that and consider what type of
4 frustration are we adding to our developers asking them
5 to hook into a system that is non-existent . We have a
6 prime example . Tuscawilla Crossing, they got into the
7 potable water because the irrigation water wasn ' t
8 available . And I ' m sure they' re not the only ones out
9 there . Just take time to look at that and consider how
10 we can help our developers . Lower the anxiety of
11 building in this city. Have a wonderful evening .
12 MR . MCCANN: Thank you, Ms . Benton. Anyone else
13 would like to take this opportunity to speak . Seeing
14 none . That brings us to adjournment . Thank you all for
15 being here . Thank you - -
16 MR . CANNON: Can I bring one thing up before we ' re
17 done . I hear what Mr . Gallow was saying and I hear what
18 Commissioner Elliott was saying. Anthony, my inclination
19 is , if they' re not going to produce those two witnesses,
20 say, within the next 30 days , that we shut this down .
21 Because I ' m not interested in this dragging out for six
22 more months or five more months .
23 So when you communication with Mr. Hamner and say
24 he would like to get this done quickly, and efficiently
25 and very efficiently, but let ' s get it done, okay? And
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 111
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 if they' re not inclined to do that then report back to
2 us and that ' s it , you know, that ' s it . There ' s still a
3 lot info that we don ' t have obviously. That we would
4 have been in a much better position had Mr . Lotcuff come
5 in and honored his subpoena . But it is what it is , you
6 know, and - - Commissioner Johnson, please .
7 MR . JOHNSON: We have a February 28th commission
8 meeting, I would say if we were getting now where by
9 that commission meeting let ' s finish it .
10 MR . CANNON: Yeah, I agree .
11 MR . JOHNSON: Yeah, we can vote on it at that time .
12 MR . CANNON: Yeah, I don ' t like the fact - - I think
13 that we did the thing In July or whatever it was - -
14 September or whatever and you know, here we are
15 basically into February. And they stalled us and I
16 don ' t like that because basically we cold have done this
17 more quickly, we could have had this done and had this
18 behind us . I know why they did it but - -
19 MR . MCCANN: We sent out approximately a dozen
20 subpoenas and we 've had three respond. Their motivation
21 for not appearing, different reasons for different
22 people I 'm sure are different .
23 MR . CANNON: We did our due diligence for the
24 taxpayers, okay, and, you know, I - - at some point , I
25 would like to testify. Me . Okay? Because the
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 112
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 suggestion has been made that because I have been a
2 commissioner for seven years I was running these sewer
3 plants and I was running this reclaimed water plant and
4 I ' m opening valves and I 'm causing all of these problems
5 that these really big problems with the sewer plants
6 were brought to my attention as a commissioner . And
7 again, it was by City Manager, Boyle .
8 And so I 'm more than happy to go under oath and put
9 that on the record. Because the fact of the matter is,
10 it didn ' t happen . Nobody brought this to my attention
11 or those that know me know that I would have been all
12 over it like Pitbull , let ' s get it fixed. But in any
13 event, we can do that sometime in the near - - some time
14 in the future .
15 MR . MCCANN: Well , those comments are on the
16 record, Mr . Mayor as they should be . And - - with a
17 court reporter here as well and they are being recorded.
18 So without further discussion - - Commissioner Benton - -
19 MR . BENTON: As a commission is it advisable that
20 we put out some sort of finding of what we did find out
21 and what we did not found out, if this - - from these
22 hearings . I think it probably is , I think for the
23 commission here for us to somehow to put that into
24 writing and make it official .
25 MR . CANNON: I think we need to generate a report
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 113
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 and I think the city manager and the city attorney ought
2 to write it and let us review it but absolutely.
3 MR . MCCANN: Yeah, I think we can - - wasn ' t the
4 dead line the 28th or whenever the next commission
5 meeting arises , then we can have that discussion and
6 have a - - set up the exact endgame - -
7 MR . CANNON: I agree .
8 MR . ELLIOT : Thank you.
9 MR . MCCANN: Any further discussion?
10 MR . BOYLE : Is that - - I just want to be clear . So
11 the meeting hasn ' t ended yet , the we had the public
12 comment . Are you directing us to not - - I 'm looking for
13 nods of heads, but are you looking for us to come back
14 with a - - a conclusion, a summary of the events and you
15 want us to do that at the end of February if they don ' t
16 appear - -
17 MR . MCCANN: I believe we ' re giving no direction at
18 this time in that - -
19 MR . BOYLE : Okay. Also you may - -
20 MR . MCCANN: We will have this conversation on the
21 28th.
22 MR . BOYLE : Okay. Thank you.
23 MR . MCCANN: No further .
24 MR . CANNON: No . But I think the city manager,
25 you, have been intimate or familiar with lessons
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 114
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 learned, failure of the system and so forth. So you
2 know, you want to get started drafting something, but
3 hopefully we ' ll get a final ones in here . And if they
4 don ' t show up, they don ' t show up and then we did our
5 best .
6 MR . BOYLE : I was focused on the procedural , you
7 know, we did public comment . If the commission were to
8 give me direction, I don ' t know if the city attorney
9 would - - say then we would need to have a final public
10 comment on the decisions of the commission, I guess - -
11
12 MR . MCCANN: We ' re giving no direction at this
13 point .
14 MR . BOYLE : Okay.
15 MR . MCCANN: We ' re talking in the sunshine .
16 MR . BOYLE : Okay.
17 MR . MCCANN: And with that being said, looking to
18 my right and to my left, any further discussion and this
19 evening has ended, thank you all again for caring about
20 your city.
21 (The meeting was concluded at 8 : 58 p .m. )
22 - - - - - -
23
24
25
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 115
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1 CERTIFICATE OF REPORTER
2
3 STATE OF FLORIDA
4 COUNTY OF SEMINOLE
5 I , Martha Braun, Court Reporter, certify that I was
6 authorized to and did stenographically report the City
7 Commission Special Meeting, pages 1 through 115 ; and that the
8 transcript is a true record of my stenographic notes .
9
10
I further certify that I am not a relative,
11
employee, attorney, or counsel of any of the parties ,
12
nor am I a relative or employee of any of the parties '
13
attorneys or counsel connected with the action, nor am I
14
financially interested in the action.
15
16
Dated this 24th day of March, 2022 .
17
18 woe
19
Martha Braun
20 Professional Court Reporter
21
22
23
24
25
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 116
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
1
2 CITY COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING
3
4
5
6 COURT REPORTER ' S CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTIONS
TO THE CITY COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING
7
8 STATE OF FLORIDA
9 COUNTY OF SEMINOLE
10
11 Under Penalties of perjury, I declare that I , Martha
12 Braun, Florida Professional Reporter, have reviewed the
13 transcript and found the following errors :
14
15 Throughout the transcript , the speaker, "Mr . Elliot"
16 should be, "Mr . Elliott" .
17
18 I hereby certify that copies have been provided to City
Attorney, Anthony Garganese .
19
20 Dated this 24th day of March, 2022 ,
21
22 woe
23
Martha Braun
24 Florida Professional Reporter
25
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 117
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
20th 414
$ 2 5 : 17 110 : 13
22
$200 , 000 2 18 : 17 5
45 : 6 45 : 5 86 : 10 240, 000
$60, 000 2 . 7 13 : 15 5
76 : 7 11 : 20 39 : 3 250 31 : 18
68 : 14 , 17 9 : 23 18 : 22 5 . 0
_ 88 : 10 103 : 4 27 14 : 10
20 99 : 10 50
- -all 16 : 4 72 : 5 28th 37 : 6
86 : 8 97 : 9 112 : 7 114 : 4 , 50-year
- -get 2000 21 37 : 6 63 : 25
79 : 21 75 : 15 2A-2 502
2002 13 : 14 9 9 : 5
8 : 24 , 25 9 : 16 58 , 000
1 16 : 1 , 3 3 9 9 : 9
10 2005
29 : 15 35 : 18 31 : 8 , 14 , 252009 3 15 : 15 7
36 : 1, 2 97 : 9
11 110 : 19 30 7
36 : 1, 2 2010 28 : 21 97 : 9 31 : 22
12 18 : 13 20 : 11 100 : 5 111 : 20 700
100 : 17 2011 300 37 : 25 88 : 7
12th 18 : 13 20 : 11 38 : 1 88 : 8 73
5 : 10 32 : 1 99 : 3 , 25 300, 000 9 : 3
14 2013 86 : 6 , 11
57 : 7 58 : 2 42 : 2 , 13 , 15 31st
43 : 9 , 14 8
14-day 3 : 4
57 : 5 , 11 53 : 15 67 : 14 35 80 ' s
2015 9 : 14
14-year 75 : 15 8 : 11, 12
90 : 16 37 -K 107 : 1
1400 2017 38 : 16 8th
86 : 22 44 : 252019 38 8 : 25
1500 8 : 11
12 : 6 26 : 10 ,
15 : 11 , 12 , 13 12 34 : 8 9
1974 39 : 12 42 : 25 4
8 : 13 43 : 7 , 14 90 ' s
1981 66 : 22 4 107 : 1
8 : 21 2021 31 : 18 , 22
199 5 : 10 39 : 11 94 : 8
108 : 22 75 : 16 4 . 11 A
19th 5 : 12
2021-09 ability
66 : 18 5 : 11 40 111 : 2
2022 8 : 10 able
3 : 4 14 : 22 15 : 20
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 1
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
39 : 1 45 : 8 5 , 11, 13 , 14 adversarial agreement
46 : 1, 9 52 : 6 45 : 10 , 16 , 20 102 : 18 106 : 7
73 : 16 78 : 6 46 : 2 , 12 advice agreements
80 : 9 , 11 48 : 17 49 : 4 61 : 16 62 : 10 42 : 6 , 7 , 18
84 : 24 85 : 15 99 : 12 advisable 108 : 1 , 5
above activity 113 : 19 and
24 : 8 , 10 , 11 46 : 15 advise 64 : 20
67 : 18 68 : 2 acts 60 : 21 ahead
absolutely 30 : 16 advising 29 : 25
16 : 12 19 : 21 actual 61 : 13 ain' t
20 : 1 23 : 3 28 : 11 34 : 5 aesthetic 103 : 16
37 : 8 55 : 13 75 : 13 76 : 9 99 : 4 , 8 air
114 : 2 85 : 25 aesthetics 16 : 9
Absolutley adapted 99 : 13 , 21 airline
7 : 5 5 : 11 affairs 106 : 22
accept add 5 : 14 Aleena
83 : 4 108 : 1 13 : 22 47 : 2 affect 7 5 : 3
acceptable 49 : 13 51 : 4 93 : 25 alerted
50 : 1 70 : 23 71 : 2 affirm 104 : 3
access 100 : 24 7 : 7 Allegiance
62 : 17 , 18 , 19 added affirmative 4 : 14
92 : 18 98 : 17 , 46 : 20 103 : 17 , 19 allow
20 , 23 adding affluent 107 : 3
accessible 19 : 7 72 : 22 14 : 9 89 : 9 allowed
70 : 10 78 : 2 111 : 4
afforded 4 : 23
accidents additional
10 : 13 allows
107 : 1 39 : 12 41 : 8
afternoon 4 : 19
accordance 45 : 16 67 : 23
81 : 9 alos
12 : 3 57 : 10 93 : 12
accurate address agenda 13 : 2
64 : 11 48 : 9 90 : 25 4 : 17 , 22 5 : 8 alternate
aggressively 46 : 20 70 : 6
acquisition 108 : 20
75 : 6 alternates
109 : 16 , 17 addressed
a ago 46 : 24 47 : 2
cross 108 : 15
104 : 8 adequate 11 : 24 16 : 4 alternative
49 : 9 89 : 8 18 : 17 23 : 25 44 : 25 45 : 5 ,
acting 35 : 18 87 : 24 15 48 : 16
26 : 7 adequately 98 : 21 102 : 16 78 : 3 81 : 13
action 26 : 23 35 : 20 , agree 110 : 21
102 : 8 21 3 9 : 4
actions adjournment 59 : 14 61 : 5 , 6 alternatively
62 : 4 76 : 24 70 : 10
17 : 19 , 20 , 21 111 : 14 87 : 8 , 20 Amen
33 : 15 adopt 92 : 25 101 : 8 4 : 12
active 103 : 13 104 : 4 108 : 25 Amendment
28 : 9 , 22 advance 112 : 10 114 : 7
9 : 3
29 : 2 , 4 , 6 , 9 , 6 : 4 14 : 18 agreeable AMF
25 30 : 15 advanced 59 : 18 38 : 15
40 : 24 41 : 3 , 78 : 4 80 : 6
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 2
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
Amiade anybody appreciated 22 : 3 25 : 13
38 : 15 54 : 4 107 : 4 110 : 10 34 : 9 5 9 : 2 3
amiant anymore approach 64 : 14
29 : 7 , 14 , 20 49 : 12 64 : 13 77 : 22 asking
30 : 14 33 : 12 103 : 8 109 : 25 appropriate 17 : 24 40 : 2
amke anyone 55 : 12 54 : 12 63 : 9 ,
59 : 24 4 : 21 5 : 5 , 21 , approval 14 80 : 8
amount 23 108 : 13 19 : 8 88 : 25 91 : 17 101 : 2
13 : 11 16 : 17 110 : 11 approve 111 : 4
48 : 6 52 : 11 111 : 12 20 : 4 asks
analysis apart approved 50 : 19 58 : 14
38 : 7 39 : 8 , 14 68 : 20 103 : 22 99 : 10 82 : 23
analyst 104 : 2 approximately assert
30 : 22 apologies 26 : 8 43 : 14 101 : 9
and/or 10 : 17 , 20 , 22 76 : 7 112 : 19 assist
45 : 7 84 : 3 aquifer 20 : 17 21 : 4 ,
angle apologize 90 : 22 12 22 : 3
arc
98 : 7 , architects::1011 316 73 : 18 75 : 1
animosity 18 56 : 3 18 : 23 92 : 10
97 : 10 103 : 8 apparent archive assistance
39 : 3 69 : 3 , 4
answer 35 : 16 73 : 16 , 17
18 : 5 , 6 22 : 2 apparently areas assistant
36 : 21 42 : 4 23 : 16 , 25 85 : 1 87 : 11 61 : 2
60 : 20 , 21 24 : 20 40 : 23 90 : 23 associated
61 : 9 , 16 , 20 48 : 3 53 : 17 arise 11 : 4 , 5
62 : 8 , 9 69 : 19 69 : 13 65 : 23 Associates
71 : 5 73 : 4 appearance 106 : 14 , 15 8 : 20
85 : 24 98 : 2 99 : 7 arises associations
answered appearances 50 : 25 114 : 5 5 : 1
61 : 10 98 : 4 , 88 : 13 assume
arising
18 appeared 69 : 18 16 : 25 52 : 15
answering 65 : 22 arms 53 : 24 100 : 6
51 : 19 60 : 16 appearing 105 : 5 assumed
answers 112 : 21 arose 18 : 17 44 : 12
62 : 12 79 : 2 appears 34 : 7 assuming
81 : 4 86 : 18 65 : 18 69 : 5 around 14 : 12 , 13
105 : 25 application 12 : 12 18 : 11 , 26 : 15 2 7 : 8
Anthony 13 : 12 14 : 7 13 45 : 6 , 19 42 : 13
3 : 21 7 : 14 applications 68 : 1 74 : 17 assure
68 : 25 79 : 11 69 : 5 80 : 19 94 : 6 107 : 4 17 : 14
83 : 1, 12 apply arrange attempt
92 : 16 101 : 8 108 : 20 32 : 15 5 : 20 , 21
111 : 18 appreciate art attempted
anticipation 18 : 4 22 : 5 41 : 6 108 : 22 24 : 21 67 : 16
91 : 16 32 : 10 38 : 24 asked attention
anxiety 51 : 18 71 : 13 26 : 5 43 : 8
1 : 2 : 1
7 19
111 : 10 9 11 88 : 18 104 : 1 ,
9
U. S . Legal Support www.uslegalsupport . com 3
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
12 , 13 113 : 6 , awards 86 : 23 89 : 16 beautificatio
10 4 : 16 90 : 10 94 : 13 n
attorney aware 99 : 2 , 10 , 24 100 : 10
3 : 21 77 : 9 , 25 10 : 16 12 : 20 100 : 1 , 13 bed
79 : 15 82 : 8 , 13 : 7 22 : 11 101 : 1 102 : 2 29 : 8 , 9
19 93 : 1 , 4 23 : 5 24 : 19 , 103 : 23 106 : 2 begin
95 : 5 , 15 96 : 1 22 2 5 : 2 , 3 , 107 : 1 108 : 18 7 : 24
97 : 2 98 : 1 18 , 19 27 : 17 109 : 7 , 13 beginning
101 : 2 114 : 1 34 : 16 , 19 112 : 1 114 : 13 20 : 24 109 : 5
attorneys 37 : 8 40 : 8 background behalf
81 : 21 41 : 1, 4 42 : 1 , 19 : 12 72 : 16 83 : 4
audience 3 44 : 2 66 : 4 , backyards behind
86 : 25 13 , 16 68 : 6 , 8 87 : 16 11 : 19 13 : 17
augment 81 : 25 bad 58 : 24 74 : 8
15 : 6 , 20 , 21 aways 86 : 5 , 6 98 : 7 89 : 19 112 : 18
67 : 20 84 : 24 18 : 14 , 15 104 : 10 behoovent
85 : 15 Aye 109 : 13 94 : 11
augmentation 84 : 6 , 8 , 10 , 12 bag believe
5 : 16 9 : 2 90 : 4 109 : 3
4 : 18 6 : 5
11 : 2 15 : 6 bare 7 : 21 11 : 8 , 11
17 : 16 22 : 14 , B 4 : 15 63 : 8 12 : 6 , 10
22 27 : 15 , 20 base 17 : 25 18 : 1
31 : 7 42 : 12 , ba 46 : 25 87 : 2 53 : 3 , 8 64 : 9
15 43 : 15 46 : 1 baseball 74 : 9 84 : 19
54 : 18 67 : 13 back 67 : 22 89 : 11 92 : 3 ,
86 : 2 102 : 14 8 : 11, 15 , 22 , based 6 , 8 114 : 17
augmenting 24 9 : 4 10 : 15 16 : 3 , 4 , 15 benefit
9 : 17 12 : 6 16 : 1 50 : 14 51 : 8 93 : 11 100 : 17
August 18 : 14 , 15 63 : 22 69 : 14 108 : 2 , 13
99 : 10 21 : 20 , 22 87 : 16 101 : 7 , Benton
authority 22 : 2 24 : 21 10 108 : 5 3 : 11, 12
19 : 19 , 21 31 : 17 32 : 18 basic 25 : 25 26 : 1
20 : 7 , 9 33 : 10 , 14 , 20 , 55 : 24 41 : 21 , 22
available 23 34 : 9 35 : 5 basically 42 : 5 , 11
6 : 24 11 : 24 36 : 1, 2 , 15 6 : 7 9 : 15 43 : 7 , 22
44 : 5 64 : 19 38 : 23 45 : 24 , 12 : 12 14 : 18 , 44 : 18 71 : 8 ,
65 : 2 , 3 70 : 5 25 46 : 11 22 15 : 25 10 77 : 1 , 2
81 : 13 93 : 7 47 : 18 48 : 22 18 : 21 20 : 10 , 84 : 5 , 6 , 17 , 18
96 : 13 101 : 7 , 49 : 23 50 : 1, 12 25 : 5 30 : 5 85 : 8 , 11
19 111 : 8 6 , 21 51 : 7 , 8 51 : 15 56 : 22 87 : 5 , 8 90 : 14
avenue 59 : 11 , 14 76 : 5 82 : 19 96 : 16 , 17
77 : 23 63 : 14 64 : 2 , 93 : 10 106 : 10 98 : 9 , 10
avenues 11 65 : 20 112 : 15 , 16 110 : 13
78 : 16 66 : 1 68 : 23 basis 111 : 12
avoiding 69 : 10 74 : 14 59 : 8 113 : 18 , 19
75 : 13 , 16 best
45 : 20 beating
78 : 24 81 : 11 102 : 23 63 : 17 71 : 5
85 : 15 , 21 73 : 10 75 : 11
U. S . Legal Support www.uslegalsupport . com 4
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
better blend bring 8 , 14
6 : 11 22 : 11 14 : 17 , 23 10 : 14 27 : 15 buttons
41 : 9 46 : 16 15 : 22 71 : 4 88 : 18 4 9 : 3
65 : 12 71 : 15 blending 104 : 12 , 13 buy
79 : 7 81 : 4 25 : 5 , 7 111 : 16 15 : 9 88 : 1 , 4
97 : 18 98 : 14 blew bringing 104 : 17
99 : 12 112 : 4 72 : 21 34 : 11 80 : 25 buys
bid blown brings 88 : 1, 6
46 : 25 94 : 15 , 76 : 18 22 : 7 25 : 24 bypass
21 97 : 12 blue 27 : 22 32 : 18 24 : 20 , 22
bidding 4 : 23 108 : 19 40 : 17 48 : 22 2 5 : 1 9 7 : 2 5
97 : 17 , 19 board 108 : 17 bypassed
big 68 : 6 104 : 8 111 : 14 69 : 22
28 : 22 57 : 5 bodies brining bypassing
58 : 4 69 : 11 24 : 11 71 : 25 25 : 14 44 : 22
73 : 22 100 : 4 body brought
103 : 5 104 : 16 65 : 13 6 : 19 26 : 5
109 : 1 113 : 5 bombarded 34 : 18 43 : 8 C
bigger 107 : 21 45 : 10 67 : 17
47 : 21 68 : 10 75 : 14 Cal
bottom 8 : 20
biggest 88 : 24 89 : 17
32 : 5 62 : 21 68 : 5 99 : 10 100 : 19 calendar
73 : 12 89 : 1 104 : 1 113 : 6 , 74 : 14 80 : 4
Bill bought call
8 : 21 36 : 12 10
44 : 3 , 4
99 : 5 104 : 8 , Brown 3 : 4 , 6 21 : 14 bills 14 99 : 24 36 : 11 , 12 , 21
20 : 2 bow budget 39 : 25 55 : 19
bio- 109 : 15
4 : 5 g 64 : 2 , 22
box 78 : 3 , 4 79 : 17
filtration 75 : 17 build 89 : 13
41 : 15 86 : 9
biological Boyle building called
38 : 17 76 : 1 3 : 19 , 20 111 : 11 17 : 12 28 : 9
biologicals
12 : 16 74 : 13 built 36 : 20 43 : 15
86 : 3 , 22 44 : 16 63 : 24
13 : 23 g9 : 12 , 16 50 : 10 75 : 18 calls
bit 93 : 20 , 21, 22 85 : 12 86 : 13 42 : 8 50 : 18
9 : 22 59 : 2 , 5 94 : 1, 4 95 : 3 100 : 11 55 : 18 64 : 22
67 : 12 87 : 6 100 : 25 bunch
101 : 18 79 : 19 109 : 13 campaign
103 : 25 108 : 1
blackballing 104 : 25 burden Cannon
97 : 16 106 : 21 113 : 7 107 : 16 3 : 9 , 10 8 : 1, 3
blame 114 : 10 , 19 , 22 burnt 10 : 18 , 21, 23
5 : 21 20 : 24 Brian 23 : 25 12 : 22 , 25
blaming 88 : 21 burrow 14 : 6 16 : 12
102 : 9 bridge 29 : 17 , 19 17 : 1 32 : 19 ,
bleach 47 : 11 business 20 35 : 15
13 : 23 briefed 4 : 7 5 : 10 , 14 36 : 8 37 : 11
104 : 23 92 : 13 108 : 3 , 48 : 25 49 : 6
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 5
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
58 : 12 , 13 carry certified choices
59 : 22 60 : 1, 108 : 5 26 : 25 27 : 8 109 : 7 , 8 , 13
6 , 14 , 17 , 19 cars 32 : 22 42 : 17 cholera
61 : 11 , 15 , 25 104 : 9 , 14 51 : 2 , 25 30 : 17
62 : 2 , 8 , 11 , case 54 : 22 55 : 9 , choosing
14 , 17 63 : 1, 2 47 : 13 66 : 24 16 , 25 56 : 21 73 : 11 94 : 24
64 : 8 68 : 24 , 85 : 5 91 : 19 65 : 18 70 : 18 chose
25 70 : 12 , 15 , 96 : 7 certify 100 : 8
22 71 : 2 , 10 , cattle 50 : 7 , 14 55 : 6
Christian
13 72 : 3 14 : 25 57 : 25 60 : 22 3 : 6 7 : 1 84 : 4
74 : 1, 5 76 : 17 caught 62 : 11 Christopher
78 : 14 79 : 10 , 64 : 20 certifying 71 : 10
11 80 : 5 27 : 7 , 10 54 : 9
81 : 10 , 18 caused Cigar
82 : 2 , 5 , 13 , 25 38 : 2 , 5 CFO 29 : 18
11 : 20
83 : 8 , 19 , 211 causing circular
chain
23 84 : 2 , 7 , 8 68 : 4 113 : 4 110 : 25
85 : 23 87 : 7 , 8 CDM 104 : 21 circumstances
89 : 15 , 21, 24 12 : 7 , 8 23 : 14 chamber 81 : 16
90 : 2 , 5 91 : 11 53 : 4 87 : 17 29 : 10 citizen
chance 92 : 7
center
92 : 16 93 : 8 ,18 97 : 1 , 2 75 : 8 95 : 19 citizens
99 : 1, 2 Central change 105 : 8
100 : 11 101 : 3 11 : 8 67 : 21 65 : 12 73 : 6 city
103 : 11 84 : 21 85 : 5 74 : 18 95 : 19 3 : 5 , 19 , 21 , 25
105 : 12 86 : 5 87 : 13 , 102 : 25 5 : 2 , 8 , 11, 13 ,
107 : 11 15 changed 14 8 : 24 9 : 6 ,
111 : 16 cents 65 : 10 85 : 3 9 , 18 10 : 1 , 2
112 : 10 , 12 , 23 110 : 9 changes 12 : 1, 13 , 16 ,
113 : 25 certain 105 : 4 21 13 : 2 , 13
114 : 7 , 24 13 : 11 24 : 12 Charles 15 : 7 16 : 3 ,
capable 52 : 11 88 : 12 , 39 : 22 , 25 10 , 13 , 20
88 : 8 13 90 : 23 74 : 16 17 : 19 21 : 7 ,
capacity 92 : 2 96 : 4 Charter 8 , 11, 17 , 22 ,
27 : 18 47 : 19 101 : 10 5 : 13 24 22 : 4 , 22
capital certainly cheaper 25 : 1 26 : 7
105 : 16 25 : 11 26 : 18 41 : 8 28 : 19 29 : 19
carbon 44 : 15 63 : 8 check 33 : 16 , 18 , 19
38 : 9 65 : 11 99 : 17 , 32 : 7 54 : 7 34 : 19 , 21
care 18 103 : 24 checks 35 : 14 , 19
7 : 2 44 : 16 certificate 19 : 11 , 22 36 : 4 , 11
52 : 6 73 : 25 51 : 12 80 : 20 chemex 37 : 2 , 7
76 : 14 80 : 17 certification 30 : 17 39 : 15 , 23
careers 50 : 22 51 : 13 chief 41 : 23 , 25
105 : 3 56 : 2 104 : 12 42 : 9 43 : 16
certification 44 : 8 , 14 47 : 9
carefully chlorine 49 : 17 50 : 8 ,
87 : 9 s 14 : 20 55 : 1
80 : 24 9 , 16 51 : 24
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 6
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
53 : 24 54 : 23 , 4 , 12 cluster comes
24 , 25 55 : 5 , clarify 73 : 23 21 : 3
6 , 11, 24 8 : 16 9 : 22 co-located command
56 : 12 , 16 , 19 11 : 22 54 : 12 29 : 3 104 : 21
57 : 1, 2 , 7 , 11 , 9 0 : 6 co-pilot comment
19 , 21 58 : 21 clarity 106 : 24 24 : 6 38 : 4
59 : 11 60 : 8 43 : 12 66 : 17 coagulates 114 : 12
63 : 19 64 : 1, Clark 30 : 18 comments
10 , 12 , 13 8 : 19 coarse 4 : 24 5 : 1, 6
65 : 24 66 : 11 , clean 48 : 6 63 : 3 113 : 15
18 68 : 5 , 9 29 : 11 46 : 1 coarser commission
69 : 17 72 : 5 , 59 : 3 , 4 44 : 25 47 : 20 3 : 5 4 : 20
7 , 16 73 : 10
cleaned Coast 5 : 2 , 9 , 11, 23
74 : 2 , 5 , 9 , 19 46 : 11 29 : 20 32 : 12 7 : 22 8 : 25
75 : 1, 7 7 7 : 9 18 : 2 39 : 10
82 : 18 85 : 7 , cleaner cold
30 : 20 112 : 16 70 : 3 , 7 , 23
16 , 25 86 : 4 , 71 : 21 74 : 18 ,
13 88 : 17 , 19 , clear coliformen 19 , 22 78 : 5
21 90 : 14 7 : 12 21 : 23 38 : 10 88 : 24 90 : 24
92 : 11 93 : 20 63 : 22 77 : 8 collaborative
17
96 : 19 97 : 8 95 : 5 97 : 3 ly 91 : 8 96
98 : 14 100 : 15 114 : 10 16 : 14 9 9 8 5
99 96 : 15
clearly : ,
101 : 1 y COLLECTIVE 15 , 23 100 : 13
103 : 12 , 141 69 : 18 90 : 13 90 : 4 102 : 15
18 , 23 , 25 105 : 20 Colorado 103 : 12 106 : 6
104 : 3 , 13 , 22 clerk 6 : 21 22 : 12
107 : 25
105 : 17 8 : 7 81 : 1
70 : 9 77 : 11 112 : 7 , 9
106 : 7 , 12 client 78 : 10 81 : 24 113 : 19 , 23
107 : 12 12 : 1 55 : 7 82 : 1 114 : 4
108 : 3 , 9 , 12 , 63 : 7 64 : 7 combination commissioner
14 109 : 12 74 : 19 8 3 : 6 78 : 4 3 : 11, 13 , 15 ,
110 : 17 , 21 client ' s combined
17 4 : 3 6 : 6
111 : 11 113 : 7 30 : 8 11 : 17 97 : 24 10 : 13 17 : 5
114 : 1 , 24 clients
come 19 : 13 22 : 7
city' s 30 : 7 83 : 4 6 : 3 16 : 8 25 : 24 27 : 22
5 : 15 73 : 20 clogging 21 : 12 30 : 2 40 : 17 , 20
civil 28 : 7 49 : 9 32 : 7 34 : 22 41 : 21 42 : 4
4 : 11 109 : 16 65 : 19 66 : 1, 42 : 6 49 : 14 44 : 19 46 : 18
claim 12 52 : 12 57 : 11 , 48 : 23 , 25
20 : 22 60 : 2 close 17 64 : 2 , 14 , 49 : 1 51 : 21
93 : 15 101 : 9 , 8 : 10 75 : 10 15 68 : 19 52 : 18 53 : 1
14 closely 73 : 21 79 : 16 65 : 6 , 16 66 : 8
claims 34 : 6 , 25 81 : 22 82 : 6 71 : 10 72 : 4 ,
20 : 25 63 : 3 closing 94 : 13 97 : 23 25 77 : 1 , 5
clarification 67 : 2 104 : 4 , 6 78 : 18 , 20
85 : 4 87 : 6 closure 106 : 8 110 : 20 81 : 6 83 : 19 ,
clarifier 32 : 10 112 : 4 114 : 13 21 84 : 2 , 5 , 9 ,
30 : 16 46 : 3 , 11, 13 , 17
U. S . Legal Support www.uslegalsupport . com 7
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
87 : 5 , 8 , 20 company condition 80 : 1
90 : 2 , 14 8 : 25 13 : 12 75 : 16 contacted
91 : 1, 20 18 : 24 19 : 1 conditions 43 : 19 , 23
93 : 19 95 : 10 41 : 24 64 : 9 50 : 3 44 : 7 65 : 25
96 : 16 98 : 9 66 : 10 69 : 8 conduct 66 : 11 , 16
102 : 1 108 : 25 89 : 6 96 : 21 5 : 9 , 13 contemplated
110 : 1 111 : 18 102 : 9 108 : 2 conference 9 : 17
112 : 6 113 : 2 , complaint 79 : 16 content
6 , 18 49 : 14 confident 38 : 3
commissioners completed 105 : 10 continue
8 : 9 17 : 3 56 : 24 57 : 22 , conflict 67 : 3 76 : 2
25 : 20 39 : 22 24 108 : 10 97 : 12
40 : 6 58 : 16 , completely confused continued
17 80 : 2 99 : 6 57 : 6 71 : 19
102 : 7 110 : 3 87 : 6 21 : 9
96 : 2 Conklin continuing
commissioning completion
32 : 23 34 : 10 8 : 19 , 20 , 21 94 : 17
26 : 14 51 : 13 connect contract
51 : 1 105 : 19 90 : 1
39 : 2 9 : 2 28 : 12
common compliance 33 : 17 46 : 24
22 : 18 23 : 24 conservation
50 : 11 , 13 86 : 6 110 : 19 49 : 16
47 : 7 , 14 comply contracted
48 : 12 106 : 9 49 : 12 consider
communcation 110 : 17 8 : 25
complying 72 : 7 57 : 21 111 : 3 , 9 contractor
consideration 33 : 17 50 : 10
communicate 72 : 17 component 9 : 18 38 : 8 , 12 56 : 11 57 : 6 ,
29 : 5 considered 23 91 : 24
communicated 35 : 4 74 : 7 components 40 : 24 97 : 11 108 : 8
76 : 9 constantly contractor ' s
communicating concept 56 : 16 , 22
12 : 13 36 : 15 106 : 1
22 : 19 47 : 23 constructed contractors
communication concern 22 : 15 24 : 5 56 : 11 , 12
35 : 18: 40 : 5: 25 7 3 : 3 8 7 : 2 2 32 : 21 contracts
35 40
58 : 15 , 21 concerned 94 : 17
construction
29 : 13 68 : 7 , 18 : 12 42 : 21 contractual
73 : 8 75 : 8 13 92 : 3 8 : 10 22 : 4
78 : 24 82 : 23 45 : 4 49 : 17
111 : 23 concerns 51 : 13 80 : 20 contributions
13 : 8 39 : 24 consultants 108 : 1
communication 75 : 14 99 : 6
s 59 : 6 control
12 : 18 , 19
103 : 3 consulted 24 : 1 75 : 9 35 : 13 37 : 17 , concluded 25 : 16 convenience
18 40 : 12 76 : 16 consulting 87 : 25
58 : 16 conclusion 40 : 22 57 : 17 conveniences
comp73 : 21 114 : 14 consumes 82 : 15
concrete
110 : 18 86 : 5 conversation
companies
28 : 20 75 : 18 contact 12 : 16 , 20
94 : 21 concurrently 29 : 10 36 : 6 43 : 17 , 18
16 : 16 44 : 9 77 : 25 45 : 18 58 : 23
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 8
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
65 : 16 68 : 23 counselor 64 : 23 65 : 25
74 : 10 114 : 20 59 : 23 60 : 14 66 : 3 69 : 2 D
conversations counts 72 : 7 , 17 , 21
4 : 10 7 : 14 38 : 9 74 : 19 89 : 3 dais
37 : 17 39 : 21 couple 91 : 7 , 24 5 : 4 , 6 10 : 12
68 : 20 92 : 10 5 : 17 20 : 14 92 : 1, 6 93 : 25 66 : 6 68 : 7 ,
108 : 11 40 : 19 58 : 14 94 : 5 97 : 8 , 16 13 , 23 95 : 15
converted 78 : 15 84 : 20 99 : 18 103 : 9 105 : 14
29 : 17 , 19 88 : 8 CPH' s 108 : 4 , 12 , 24
convey course 14 : 14 19 : 14 data
101 : 18 13 : 16 14 : 15 56 : 8 57 : 16 27 : 1 38 : 10
convienience 56 : 6 75 : 21 C4 54 : 23 55 : 7 ,
83 : 13 91 : 17 97 : 4 61 : 15 62 : 3 , 9 9 , 22 56 : 1
cooperate court create 105 : 19
63 : 12 3 : 24 62 : 13 68 : 11 97 : 10 date
cooperative 79 : 20 , 23 103 : 8 6 : 24 42 : 1
91 : 25 96 : 7 110 : 13 created 60 : 22 62 : 4
coordinate 113 : 17 27 : 18 103 : 8 dates
70 : 5 courtesy 106 : 25 42 : 3 , 17 70 : 6
copier 110 : 11 creates daughter ' s
106 : 15 courts 102 : 20 59 : 3
corporate 100 : 3 criteria David
92 : 7 cover 13 : 21 89 : 11 6 : 16 7 : 15
correct 30 : 12 crops 17 : 12 , 13 , 14
7 : 18 , 19 coverage 15 : 4 , 17 88 : 3 18 : 8 19 : 19
11 : 17 17 : 8 20 : 17 , 25 Crossing 40 : 19 65 : 8
18 : 8 19 : 25 cow 111 : 6 69 : 3 72 : 14
33 : 16 52 : 24 25 : 8 Crossings 74 : 7 , 15 , 24
66 : 3 85 : 21 CPH 87 : 11 90 : 24 75 : 6 , 10
correctly 6 : 14 7 : 12 crumbling 76 : 12 90 : 18
14 : 13 , 14 8 : 9 , 18 , 21 104 : 2 91 : 24
58 : 22 104 : 10 9 : 7 , 11, 12 , cup day
106 : 5 107 : 19 13 , 14 , 23 16 : 16 90 : 20 13 : 15 15 : 2
cost 11 : 5 , 25 current 55 : 15 58 : 9
45 : 5 , 20 12 : 21 13 : 18 20 : 17 50 : 15 76 : 18 81 : 8
costly 14 : 8 , 10 15 : 5 75 : 5 86 : 5 , 10
29 : 1 16 : 2 , 6 , 18 customer day-in
costs 18 : 11 19 : 17 87 : 2 107 : 13
40 : 25 20 : 22 21 : 4 , customers day-out
24 22 : 14 107 : 13
5 : 19 6 : 19 cut
counsel 25 : 15 31 : 16 86 : 22
day-to-day 35 : 4 , 7 , 9 , 13 ,
7 : 12 18 : 5 17 36 : 4522 74 : 2 33 : 23
, ,
60 : 21 61 : 13 , cycle days
17 , 18 62 : 10 38 : 6 40 : 4 94 : 4 57 : 7 58 : 2
63 : 7 69 : 24 43 : 19 54 : 10 111 : 20
92 : 2 59 : 11 , 17 cycles dead
60 : 8 , 24 10 : 16
114 : 4
62 : 20 63 : 25
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 9
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
deal 103 : 15 , 18 desired diligently
23 : 16 45 : 2 104 : 22 107 : 7 9 : 19 68 : 10
68 : 16 103 : 5 depending destroy direct
dealing 60 : 9 59 : 17 61 : 7 19 : 2 26 : 18
10 : 2 50 : 16 depositions destroying 28 : 16 35 : 9
106 : 13 79 : 20 96 : 5 105 : 2 38 : 13 62 : 17
decide deputy details directed
96 : 22 3 : 9 8 : 1 10 : 6 28 : 12 25 : 1
decision 32 : 18 40 : 16 determined directing
48 : 19 73 : 11 48 : 25 68 : 24 5 : 2 114 : 12
95 : 23 100 : 1 71 : 9 73 : 3 detrimentally direction
108 : 6 79 : 10 82 : 11 92 : 5 35 : 24 91 : 8
decisions 83 : 18 84 : 1, 7 develop 93 : 17 101 : 2
19 : 24 23 : 7 87 : 7 90 : 1 110 : 21 114 : 17
99 : 25 91 : 6 92 : 13 Developer directions
declined 97 : 1 99 : 1 110 : 20 27 : 17
45 : 4 102 : 23 developers directly
declining 103 : 10 111 : 4 , 10 9 : 24 40 : 13
16 : 16 90 : 20 describe director
18 : 10 46 : 17 deviate
dedicated 59 : 20 97 : 3 11 : 20 24 : 21 ,
107 : 11 described dictated 25 34 : 1 , 25
deep 44 : 22 72 : 5 75 : 4 , 5
29 : 8 desicion 51 : 10 directs
96 : 24 dies
defective 5 : 23 6 : 1 70 : 7
104 : 15 design dis-way
9 : 7 10 : 25 difference
define 96 : 1 97 : 19
24 : 24 107 : 19 12 : 1, 2 18 : 12 disagreeing
23 : 18 24 : 12 different
definitely 2 : 18 28 : 12 , 9 : 8 19 : 1 78 : 22
105 : 12 107 : 9 15 29 : 22 23 : 11 28 : 8 disc
definitively 30 : 10 32 : 6 30 : 13 , 15 , 24 ,
90 : 19 30 : 7 32 : 1 59 : 13 62 : 7 25 31 : 23
3 : 6 38 : 13
degree 3 : 2 : 68 : 10 73 : 21 discovered
86 : 14 45 : 15 47 : 16 75 : 23 85 : 24 26 : 4 43 : 7
delays 23 67 : 15 , 18 , 90 : 17 95 : 11 , discuss
101 : 23 70 : 19 72 : 18 12 96 : 10 67 : 6 77 : 4
delete 73 : 11 85 : 2 , 97 : 20 108 : 9 , 109 : 22
60 : 4 20 99 : 20 , 22 11 112 : 21 , 22 discussed
demands 109 : 10 difficult 13 : 1 39 : 20
9 : 19 16 : 15 designed 31 : 20 45 : 1 discussing
DEP 13 : 10 15 : 25 63 : 12 64 : 5 , 34 : 2
13 : 13 14 : 1 23 : 2 27 : 3 , 4 , 15 108 : 12 discussion
27 : 8 , 9 49 : 12 14 , 16 33 : 1 difficulties 7 : 22 66 : 6 , 24
50 : 12 , 13 45 : 2 47 : 5 81 : 24 71 : 11 83 : 20
51 : 12 54 : 5 48 : 15 49 : 7 dig 84 : 4 , 16 91 : 5
80 : 23 84 : 21 , 23 , 24 63 : 14 86 : 17 101 : 25 102 : 8
department 85 : 13 diligence 108 : 16
59 : 11 112 : 23 113 : 18
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 10
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
114 : 5 , 9 Dole dying elected
discussions 10 : 3 15 : 18 17 : 20
10 : 5 50 : 3 dollar dynasamp electrical
dismay 11 : 15 , 17 29 : 9 68 : 3
94 : 19 15 : 10 39 : 4 dynaset electricity
dismissed 88 : 1, 6 29 : 8 90 : 11
21 : 10 100 : 12 element
disposition dollars E 16 : 7 110 : 19 ,
74 : 18 11 : 21 52 : 7 20 , 25
disregard 68 : 14 , 17 earlier elevation
82 : 9 88 : 11 103 : 4 26 : 4 58 : 15 24 : 8 , 10
dissolved dots 91 : 2 ELLIOT
38 : 9 39 : 2 earliest 4 : 5 17 : 6
distinction dovetails 65 : 1 19 : 18 , 23
76 : 3 63 : 7 earl 20 : 21 21 : 2
distribution dozen 8 ; 2 40 : 24 22 : 5 40 : 18
85 : 11 112 : 19 ears 48 : 24 65 : 7
document dragging 107 : 12 71 : 11 , 14
14 : 5 , 13
101 : 22 easier 73 : 2 74 : 4
53 : 4 , 8 , 9 111 : 21 79 : 25 82 : 6 78 : 19 84 : 14
60 : 7 , 23 61 : 4 drastic 97 : 6 , 22 98 : 2 91 : 21 94 : 3
69 : 19 105 : 24 25 : 14 easiest 102 : 2 114 : 8 documentation drastically 81 : 19 82 : 18 Elliott
30 : 1
25 : 17 35 : 5 , east 3 : 17 , 18 4 : 36 : 6 17 : 5
7 , 8 36 : 17 drawing 32 : 12 86 : 24
54 : 10 59 : 15 38 : 11 easy 19 : 13 40 : 17 85 : 3 , 21 drinking 79 : 22 81 : 19 48 : 23 65 : 6
documents 9 : 20 72 : 25 76 : 25
effect 78 : 18 84 : 13
8 : 7 10 : 25 drops 74 ; 9 87 : 20 91 : 20
35 : 11 , 14 46 : 4 effecting 102 : 1 108 : 25
37 : 13 54 : 2 drought 66 : 2 92 : 5 110 : 1 111 : 18
59 : 13 , 18 75 : 15 effective email
60 : 9 61 : 7 dry 75 : 25 76 : 2 35 : 19 93 : 16
79 : 19 81 : 1 75 : 19 101 : 5 96 : 8
88 : 23 91 : 14 , drying efficient emails
18 92 : 21 15 : 17 48 : 13 75 : 24 ,
dog 35 : 8 36 : 3 , 6
dually 25 employ
102 : 23 10 : 107 : 16 efficiently 05 8 doing due 111 : 24 , 25 employed
4 : 4 24 : 4 112 : 23 eight-year 21 : 8
38 : 7 53 : 18 dump 106 : 4 employee
54 : 3 , 14 104 : 17 either 14 : 8 104 : 3
71 : 24 76 : 8 duties 7 : 23 34 : 8 108 : 13
18 : 18 42 : 14 36 : 11 39 : 9
87 : 23 90 : 23 employees
102 : 16 104 : 6 duty 51 : 6 63 : 12 9 : 23 17 : 19
108 : 8 , 14 103 : 17 , 19 64 : 5 95 : 12 18 : 22 19 : 4 ,
96 : 24
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 11
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
6 , 8 25 : 19 86 : 4 101 : 4 expoliation
40 : 4 64 : 12 entirely exact 69 : 1 91 : 7 , 22
88 : 17 93 : 7 100 : 2 114 : 6 92 : 4 , 12 94 : 3
98 : 22 103 : 14 entities exactly 96 : 3 101 : 4
107 : 8 , 12 , 17 17 : 21 103 : 2 21 : 4 30 : 6 102 : 21
employment 106 : 9 76 : 4 82 : 23 extend
41 : 23 108 : 8 entity exceeded 52 : 18 89 : 23 ,
end 73 : 17 33 : 7 24 90 : 15
41 : 24 51 : 1 environment exception 91 : 3
70 : 6 75 : 18 62 : 23 59 : 25 extending
109 : 1 114 : 15 equipment excuse 87 : 10 90 : 22
ended 38 : 20 49 : 19 60 : 8 69 : 3 extension
100 : 8 114 : 11 52 : 7 , 9 , 13 85 : 8 , 9 93 : 3 89 : 7
endgame 104 : 17 , 18 exist extent
71 : 15 , 21 essentially 35 : 25 36 : 22 19 : 15 62 : 3
73 : 4 114 : 6 21 : 10 57 : 18 62 : 3 75 : 22 89 : 25
engine estate existed 90 : 17
15 : 10 100 : 22 59 : 16 extra
engineer ethics existence 47 : 1 90 : 11
10 : 7 16 : 13 105 : 5 108 : 5 62 : 20 extrapolate
25 : 21 26 : 25 evaulated existing 106 : 24 107 : 2
34 : 5 51 : 2 , 11 12 : 8 20 : 16 45 : 7 eyes
56 : 3 71 : 3 evening 87 : 2 107 : 12
72 : 5 88 : 21 3 : 3 4 : 9 6 : 13 exists
94 : 13 100 : 8 17 : 7 22 : 10 3 5 : 2 3
F
engineering
84 : 17 108 : 22 expand
6 : 14 9 : 7 111 : 11 45 : 6 107 : 8 fabric
18 : 11 24 : 2 event
27 : 9 4 0 : 23 expect 30 : 11 , 24
27 : 11 23 13 : 3 , 4 83 : 9 104 : 11 31 : 16 , 17 , 23
89 : 1 113 : 13 expectation face
90 : 13 94 : 5 , events 107 : 18 69 : 7
19 19,7 97 : 20
114 : 14 expectations facilities
engineers
eventually 16 : 10 22 : 20 84 : 25
8 : 22 10 : 3 50 : 21 expected facility
18 : 23 32 : 25
everybody 33 : 9 13 : 15 17 : 16
33 : 3 , 5 , 9 57 : 8 64 : 8 , 10 expensive 18 : 12 21 : 15
38 : 6 , 25 39 : 5 87 : 25 105 : 13 24 : 1 28 : 25 23 : 12 , 13
68 : 10 72 : 18 108 : 24 29 : 12 26 : 19 , 22
73 : 5 88 : 16 everyone experience 27 : 14 28 : 22 ,
94 : 25 3 : 3 10 : 15 47 : 6 80 : 9 24 29 : 16 , 24
enlightenment 108 : 23 expert 30 : 4 34 : 20
4 : 8 everyone ' s 96 : 19 45 : 2 47 : 5 , 12
63 : 2 56 : 12 , 23
enormous explain
94 : 15 everytime 80 : 12 81 : 24 57 : 1, 7 , 15 , 24
entire 107 : 19 85 : 25 91 : 11 58 : 7 59 : 2
5 : 4 68 : 12 evidence exploded fact
69 : 1 96 : 5 , 6 76 : 5 75 : 8 91 : 22
U. S . Legal Support www.uslegalsupport . com 12
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
95 : 6 97 : 7 federal fill find
112 : 12 113 : 9 109 : 17 4 : 23 39 : 1 6 : 9 32 : 10
facts feed 108 : 19 67 : 2 68 : 8
5 : 22 6 : 9 85 : 13 , 14 , 15 filter 79 : 7 86 : 18
62 : 24 86 : 3 , 12 , 23 13 : 22 21 : 24 102 : 3 , 24
failings 87 : 1 29 : 5 30 : 10 , 109 : 7 , 18 , 23
43 : 19 feeding 20 , 23 31 : 19 110 : 8 113 : 20
failure 86 : 16 33 : 12 44 : 22 , finding
72 : 16 73 : 8 feeds 24 45 : 5 , 7 , 23 39 : 11 67 : 5
78 : 24 86 : 23 87 : 1 46 : 8 , 9 , 19 68 : 13 113 : 20
fair feel 47 : 21 , 22 fine
13 : 6 , 19 38 : 15 103 : 12 48 : 2 , 5 49 : 13 17 : 13 56 : 1
14 : 11 15 : 14 , fees 51 : 4 72 : 22 74 : 4 76 : 15
15 16 : 18 94 : 19 88 : 11 80 : 1 81 : 22
33 : 2 37 : 17 fella filteration 83 : 12 88 : 21
fall 77 : 15 25 : 14 93 : 3
102 : 5 fellow filtering finer
falling 8 : 9 17 : 3 35 : 20 44 : 24 47 : 22 48 : 7 , 8
103 : 22 104 : 2 25 : 20 45 : 23 finger
familiar fiduciary filters 71 : 18
114 : 25 19 : 10 105 : 7 23 : 22 24 : 22 fingers
family field 28 : 7 29 : 7 , 9 , 6 : 8 102 : 8
14 : 25 108 : 7 69 : 8 86 : 8 14 , 20 30 : 13 , finish
14 , 15 31 : 16 ,
far fields 42 : 20 61 : 5
8 : 15 27 : 17 15 : 5 67 : 22 , 17 36 : 13 80 : 18 87 : 2538 : 2 45 : 3 , 8 , 112 : 9
32 : 14 34 : 13 23 86 : 8 14 , 19 , 22 , 25
80 : 5 83 : 5 88 : 21 89 : 10 finished
46 : 3 , 6 , 15 42 : 14 43 : 9 ,
109 : 18 figure 47 : 6 , 8 , 10 ,
13 , 18 70 : 2
farmer 11 : 15 , 17 11, 12 , 13 82 : 3 95 : 11
88 : 1, 6 19 : 18 37 : 9 48 : 10 , 12 101 : 21
farmers 3 9 : 6 76 : 10 , 4 9 : 8 5 0 : 6 fire
15 : 1 13 83 : 7 65 : 19 , 25
fashion 107 : 15 66 : 10 , 12 105 : 20 3
92 : 15 figured 105 : 20
g 69 : 21 76 : 4 , 9
faster 37 : 20 90 : 6 , 7 , 8 fired
41 : 9 figuring 105 : 25 21 : 10
favor 21 : 4 75 : 1 filtration firing
90 : 3 file 23 : 7 , 18 29 : 3 19 : 2
feasibility 35 : 22 36 : 17 38 : 16 99 : 21 firm
9 : 1 , 16 16 : 1 59 : 13 final 91 40 : 23
4
feasible filed 50 : 9 86 : 19 : 11
77 : 10 13 : 12 99 : 3 102 : 25 first
February files finance 5 : 5 , 16 7 : 22
112 : 7 , 15 35 : 18 , 19 11 : 20 8 : 2 13 : 4 , 7
114 : 15 59 : 15 60 : 5 financial 24 : 16 67 : 15
fecal 61 : 7 62 : 18 19 : 24 73 : 17 70 : 8 74 : 15
84 : 3 85 : 5
38 : 10
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 13
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
fit folks found
94 : 17 20 : 7 , 9 39 : 2 113 : 21 G
five follow four
5 : 1 13 : 14 , 25 29 : 2 , 9 82 : 20 gallon
14 : 19 33 : 7 61 : 13 , 21, 23 four-month 13 : 15 86 : 10
82 : 21 94 : 9 62 : 10 80 : 14 100 : 4
111 : 22 follow-up fowling gallons
fix 40 : 19 80 : 10 , 38 : 17 15 : 11 , 12 , 14
33 : 21 37 : 4 11 86 : 19 Frank 37 : 25 38 : 1
72 : 23 88 : 14 followed 7 : 11 86 : 7 88 : 7 , 8
fixed 29 : 6 frankly Gallow
73 : 13 113 : 12 following 68 : 15 78 : 7 108 : 20 , 22
fixing 29 : 3 81 : 3 82 : 6 110 : 10
72 : 20 110 : 4 foot 93 : 2 100 : 16 111 : 17
flat 28 : 21 100 : 5 free game
64 : 21 footed 40 : 22 11 : 13
fleas 64 : 21 Friday games
101 : 12 foresee 81 : 1 11 : 9 72 : 14
flood 100 : 7 front gaps
24 : 10 68 : 3 foreseen 46 : 3 , 13 48 : 5 39 : 1
flooded 100 : 6 51 : 1 87 : 15 GARAGNESE
23 : 25 68 : 2 Forest front-loaders 77 : 24
floored 11 : 19 13 : 17 104 : 17 Garganese
92 : 25 form fruition 3 : 2 2 , 2 3
Florida 4 : 23 5 : 14 68 : 19 70 : 3 , 14 , 20 ,
11 : 8 16 : 23 43 : 12 108 : 19 frustration 23 78 : 17
70 : 10 78 : 2 formal 110 : 16 111 : 4 80 : 1 81 : 25
flow 5 : 13 full 83 : 2 91 : 6 ,
28 : 9 , 22 formed 23 : 17 2 9 : 2 12 , 15 93 : 16
29 : 2 , 5 , 6 , 9 , 8 : 21 103 : 22 96 : 3
25 30 : 15 , 16 forth full-time gather
40 : 24 41 : 3 , 10 : 25 24 : 1 67 : 20 4 : 6 5 : 22
5 , 11, 13 , 14 34 : 3 38 : 3 function gathered
45 : 10 , 16 , 20 69 : 23 78 : 25 23 : 1 21 : 17
46 : 2 , 12 87 : 9 90 : 12 functionality gave
48 : 17 99 : 12 , forward 74 : 23 12 : 7 64 : 21
13 6 : 17 , 18 70 : 5
flush functioning
39 : 17 52 : 5 57 : 10 Gear
24 : 21 57 : 3 68 : 9 future 69 : 3
flushing 71 : 23 73 : 18 , 9 : 18 , 19 geared
24 : 20 36 : 16 24 81 : 15 16 : 2 , 3 , 14 , 15 25 : 21 78 : 8
90 : 10 106 : 2 97 : 19 , 21 79 : 4 , 9 86 : 15 general
focus 101 : 6 , 9 , 10 94 : 13 , 14 12 : 19 16 : 18
74 : 20 87 : 13 104 : 5 , 6 102 : 6 , 7 107 : 8
105 : 8 110 : 2 , 4 103 : 4 105 : 11 generally
focused foul 110 : 4 113 : 14 11 : 25 12 : 15
86 : 16 5 : 3 13 : 18 14 : 1
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 14
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
generate 4 : 8 17 : 2 22 , 23 79 : 1 15 , 17 , 19 , 21 ,
113 : 25 30 : 3 32 : 9 80 : 8 81 : 11 24 7 : 3 , 6 , 10
gentleman 55 : 7 72 : 1 83 : 9 86 : 7 , 14 84 : 5 , 7 , 9 , 11 ,
77 : 3 given 88 : 2 89 : 10 13 89 : 23
gentlemen 12 : 7 16 : 20 91 : 2 92 : 11 great
7 : 23 66 : 25 44 : 8 81 : 15 94 : 20 , 24 23 : 16 41 : 20
67 : 3 , 11 104 : 24 , 25 95 : 5 97 : 3 , 68 : 16
77 : 17 81 : 16 106 : 19 , 21 19 , 20 , 21 grossly
95 : 13 , 21 giving 99 : 2 101 : 5 , 20 : 25
genuinely 114 : 17 8 , 11 102 : 3 , ground
64 : 9 glad 15 , 24 , 25 85 : 17
german 30 : 3 32 : 8 , 15 103 : 11 104 : 5 groups
17 : 11 goal 106 : 144 : 25
107 : 20 , 23
get all 9 : 19 18 : 1 growth
109 : 2 , 4 , 9 ,
76 . 8 67 . 1 10 , 11 , 20 , 22 , 9 : 19 16 : 3 ,
get along goes 14 , 15
32 : 11 9 : 4 29 : 10 23 110 : 7 , 8
111 : 19 guess
getting 56 : 18 64 : 11 24 : 1, 2 , 6
19 : 16 35 : 20 89 : 13 gold 28 : 21 35 : 1
36 : 15 48 : 2 going 109 : 1 36 : 25 42 : 16
57 : 4 73 : 15 5 : 22 6 : 11 good 48 : 17 54 : 16
80 : 7 90 : 10 8 : 8 , 11 3 : 3 17 : 7 , 11 65 : 15 77 : 14
101 : 23 10 : 16 , 18 22 : 10 89 : 20 78 : 15 89 : 21
102 : 11 112 : 8 11 : 19 13 : 14 92 : 7 101 : 17 95 : 8 99 : 8 , 11
giant
16 : 1 17 : 2 , 23 106 : 1 108 : 22 109 : 14 109 : 1 18 : 14 , 15 109 : 2 guessing
Gierach 19 : 16 , 20 Gourtcher 45 : 18 65 : 23
22 : 12 23 : 4 62 : 5
6 : 16 , 20 , 23 guidelines
27 : 20 30 : 1, Goutcher
7 : 5 , 9 , 12 8 : 4 5 : 25 6 : 2 , 4
12 : 24 14 : 4 19 38 : 11 10 : 3 , 24 11 : 4 106 : 8 , 10
39 : 6 , 17 13 : 12 14 : 8
16 : 19 17 : 4 , 33 : 24 34 : 4 , 9 guy
7 , 9 , 10 19 : 21 41 : 12 45 : 23 , 76 : 12
25 46 : 14 , 15 , 35 : 2 40 : 5
36 : 9 , 10 , 23 , guys
16 47 : 21 44 : 3 61 : 6
25 39 : 20 65 : 4 69 : 4 , 13 21 : 21 26 : 13
42 : 9 43 : 21 48 : 7 49 : 3 32 : 12 36 : 6
55 : 8 56 : 13 , 70 : 1 71 : 3
44 : 11 49 : 7 72 : 11 , 12 42 : 12 54 : 6
52 : 24 54 : 21 14 57 : 3 69 : 6 70 : 25
58 : 14 60 : 6 59 : 14 , 24 76 : 21 80 : 21 79 : 22 86 : 17
, 81 : 3 82 : 14
20 61 : 15 , 181 60 : 4 61 : 16 , 102 : 16
23 62 : 1 , 9 , 16
18 , 21 63 : 17 83 : 5 , 6 , 11 , 12
64 : 1 67 : 23 92 : 18 93 : 10
63 : 21 64 : 91 99 : 18 101 : 19 H
69 : 6 19 67 : 9 68 : 21 69 : 15
72 : 8 74 : 71 : 4 , 16 , 25 Goutcher ' s
72 : 12 73 : 6 , 70 : 17 96 : 13 Hale
93 : 3
Gies 14 , 15 , 18 governmental 3 : 15 , 16
74 : 25 75 : 2 106 : 9 27 : 23 , 24
8 : 20 31 : 1, 3 , 6 , 9 ,
76 : 4 , 11 , 14 , GOWAN
give 19 78 : 1 , 13 , 3 : 7 , 9 , 11, 13 , 12 , 14 , 17
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 15
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
32 : 2 , 4 handheld heads 65 : 25 104 : 14
51 : 21 , 22 110 : 12 4 : 5 102 : 15 hiatus
52 : 18 , 20 , 25 handle 114 : 13 80 : 14
78 : 20 , 21 46 : 9 hear hiding
83 : 17 , 21, 24 handled 21 : 19 , 21 63 : 18
84 : 2 , 11 , 12 83 : 2 36 : 8 , 10 high
90 : 2 91 : 1 , 2 handling 46 : 17 60 : 6 49 : 10 67 : 15 ,
93 : 19 , 20 , 24 33 : 23 61 : 11 , 12 25 75 : 19
94 : 2 95 : 1 , 9 hands 77 : 7 , 15 , 18 100 : 5 109 : 10
Hale ' s 11 : 1 3 8 : 2 5 78 : 13 84 : 18 highly
40 : 20 handwritten 110 : 15 94 : 10
half 54 : 15 111 : 17 hill
39 : 13 happen heard 75 : 12
Hall 8 2 39 : 17 6 : 1 22 : 1 hindsight
42 : 9 75 : 7 56 : 9 72 : 20 28 : 18 63 : 2 100 : 17
Hamner 79 : 3 , 8 88 : 14 69 : 14 70 : 9 hiring
7 : 11, 19 , 25 : 17 84 : 20
98 : 24 105 : 15 77 19 : 2
8 : 5 12 : 18 113 : 10 hearing
14 : 2 , 12 16 : 7 93 : 23 107 : 5 historically
happened 59 : 10
19 : 12 20 : 2 , 6 : 10 25 : 16 hearings history
19 , 22 21 : 23 30 : 6 , 9 41 : 1 , 113 : 22 29 : 21 84 : 22
22 : 16 24 : 24 4 43 : 3 , 10 hearsay 105 : 16 , 17
26 : 11 31 : 1, 64 : 17 68 : 14 28 : 16 , 18 hitting
4 , 8 , 10 , 13 , 71 : 22 75 : 17 heck 49 : 3
15 , 25 32 : 3 , 102 : 4 , 10 103 : 3 hold
11 35 : 11 , 24 103 : 5 107 : 10 held
36 : 9 , 19 42 : 4 happening 5 : 17 75 : 7 62 : 5 91 : 12
43 : 6 , 12 44 : 8 92 : 17 95 : 12 ,
46 : 17 , 24 105 : 11 Hello 24
49 : 1, 5 52 : 1 , happy 8 ' 4 holds
18 , 21 53 : 6 , 19 : 15 70 : 24 help 60 : 3
80 : 13 96 : 8 50 : 19 61 : 9
16 54 : 12 101 : 22 113 : 8 72 : 22 74 : 11 Holmes
55 : 18 59 : 20 , 8 : 19 , 21 , 22
24 60 : 2 , 11, hard 76 : 19 81 : 14 home
16 61 : 10 , 12 , 42 : 4 93 : 22 89 : 4 92 : 1 79 : 13 81 : 20
20 62 : 7 , 25 95 : 7 95 : 4 111 : 10
hat helped homeowner' s
63 : 2 64 : 19 4 : 25
66 : 17 , 22 110 : 7 5 : 9
homes
67 : 10 69 : 1, hate hesitation
85 : 6
12 70 : 5 96 : 23 24 : 24 homework
77 : 25 80 : 2 hawk heterotrophic
78 : 8
82 : 19 83 : 3 , 47 : 3 38 : 9 honest
8 , 13 93 : 1 he ' ll hey
76 : 12
111 : 23 65 : 2 12 : 13 34 : 9
35 : 10 , 19 honestly
hand head 77 : 15
7 : 7 53 : 12 , 19 51 : 4 103 : 15 , 36 : 12 43 : 16
44 : 16 51 : 3 honor
78 : 25 79 : 1, 18 104 : 22 72 : 6 100 : 1
18 63 : 24 64 : 23
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 16
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
honored impact 5 : 18 77 : 7 inquiries
112 : 5 50 : 5 industrial 34 : 12
hook implement 28 : 22 inquiry
52 : 22 79 : 23 39 : 16 industry 70 : 14
88 : 5 110 : 23 important 106 : 22 inside
111 : 5 72 : 15 75 : 24 inevitably 19 : 17
hooked 76 : 3 106 : 14 insight
15 : 12 impossible info 4 : 8 19 : 19
hoot 45 : 2 112 : 3 105 : 1
106 : 16 improve informal install
hope 30 : 2 43 : 18 64 : 22 28 : 10
2 0 : 2 89 : 3 improvements information installed
98 : 23 99 : 9 10 : 5 11 : 24 29 : 15
hostile inappropriate 55 : 6 62 : 15 , installing
62 : 23 68 : 12 107 : 20 24 64 : 11 29 : 13
hours inclination 67 : 5 69 : 16 instance
110 : 15 111 : 18 72 : 1 86 : 12 107 : 3
House inclined 93 : 13 98 : 11 , instructed
74 : 17 76 : 20 , 24 18 , 20 101 : 7 , 82 : 9 98 : 1
hundred 112 : 1 14 105 : 4 , 9 insurance
24 : 8 , 10 88 : 8 including 107 : 9 109 : 4 20 : 16 , 25
105 : 17 58 : 17 informational 63 : 6 , 10 64 : 4
Hurricane increase 4 : 17 intake
23 : 24 68 : 2 16 : 17 46 : 11 informed 75 : 17
hurt 47 : 19 17 : 15 intakes
95 : 1 increased infrastructur 67 : 18
hydrant 45 : 24 46 : 10 a intended
15 : 12 incriminate 68 : 16 86 : 20 27 : 18 47 : 17
98 : 12 initial 67 : 19
I independent 45 : 4 85 : 2 , 20 intention
94 : 24 initially 17 : 24
idea Indian 27 : 16 99 : 20 interactivity
71 : 22 100 : 8 108 : 22 initiate 36 : 4
identified indicate 5 : 13 interest
49 : 24 , 25 66 : 11 91 : 25 initiated 63 : 8 , 18 64 : 6
ignore indicated 36 : 6 interested
64 : 1 23 : 15 76 : 11 inlet 111 : 21
ignored indicating 97 : 14 interesting
71 : 19 , 20 74 : 25 91 : 6 inner- 28 : 11
illustrates indirect Workings internal
22 : 2 87 : 2 19 : 14 35 : 14 44 : 24
immediate individual input 60 : 12
108 : 7 4 : 24 5 : 4 4 : 18 , 22 , 23 interrupt
immediately individually 16 : 10 19 : 2 10 : 10
90 : 1 108 : 17 ,
21 : 13 14 : 4 intervening
individuals 18 63 : 23
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 17
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
interview 46 : 8 , 10 Johnson kid
19 : 5 76 : 21, 50 : 16 60 : 15 , 3 : 13 , 14 93 : 1
22 92 : 17 18 65 : 19 , 21 22 : 8 , 9 32 : 14 kin
93 : 10 68 : 1 70 : 25 44 : 19 , 20 15 : 9
interviews 73 : 9 46 : 18 , 22 kind
19 : 7 issued 47 : 4 53 : 1 , 2 , 8 : 6 15 : 9
intimate 40 : 1, 2 6 54 : 16 55 : 3 17 : 1 20 : 6
114 : 25 issues 65 : 16 66 : 7 , 9 23 : 24 24 : 3
investigation 17 : 25 28 : 5 77 : 5 , 6 , 21 28 : 8 29 : 21
5 : 14 91 : 17 , 34 : 2 , 11 , 14 , 78 : 7 , 15 30 : 23 34 : 1
19 16 , 18 , 20 81 : 6 , 7 , 11 36 : 19 39 : 5 , 8
investigatory 40 : 13 45 : 22 82 : 4 84 : 9 , 10 40 : 19 45 : 18 ,
5 : 12 48 : 10 50 : 20 112 : 6 , 7 , 11 19 58 : 2
invocation 64 : 20 65 : 23 jsut 71 : 22 73 : 16 ,
4 : 4 67 : 15 68 : 7 102 : 9 22 , 24 78 : 23
invoking 107 : 6 Juice 80 : 8 89 : 4 , 6
5 : 12 item 59 : 3 , 4 91 : 23 92 : 25
involved 4 : 22 5 : 7 , 10 July 93 : 5 102 : 22
9 : 24 17 : 18 99 : 5 5 : 10 8 : 25 106 : 9 108 : 2
26 : 18 38 : 13 99 : 3 112 : 13 kinds
50 : 21 56 : 6 J jump 106 : 13
102 : 18 4 : 17 Kip
involvement January justified 40 : 9 , 12
42 : 22 50 : 18 3 : 4 70 : 6 68 : 17 44 : 22 46 : 22
involving Jason 48 : 1 69 : 20
40 : 13 75 : 5 86 : 24 , K 72 : 4 75 : 4
25 89 : 18 77 : 8 , 17 89 : 1
Irma knew
23 : 24 68 : 2 90 : 6 95 : 4 keep 4 : 13
3:
irrelevant 96 : 9 100 : 19 4 : 10 35 : 8 1198 104 : 9
14 : 3 21 : 1 104 : 8 59 : 5 67 : 22
irrigate
Jesup 71 : 14 95 : 18 , knock 15 : 4 88 : 2 5 : 16 11 : 2 , 20 , 21 97 : 7 13 : 23
16 , 22 12 : 9 103 : 7 105 : 7 knoeledge
irrigating 13 : 5 , 22 keeping 40 : 3
25 : 10 17 : 16 23 : 7 63 : 19 know
irrigation 38 : 8 , 10 kept 9 : 3 , 23 , 24 , 25
9 : 20 14 : 24 15 : 1, 4 , 6 , 7 , 39 : 23 65 : 9 95 : 16 10 : 1, 4 , 6
67 : 13 , 15 Kevin 11 : 7 , 12 , 18
19 , 20 , 22 68 : 2 75 : 21 14 : 17 , 19
25 : 8 88 : 2 , 4 3 : 7 , 9 13 : 2
86 : 2 90 : 8 44 : 13 , 15 16 : 22 , 23
1 : 7 58 : 21 59 : 8 11 110 : 22 99 : 7 100 : 9 , 18 : 23 19 : 1,
irrigation-11 20 88 : 19 15 20 : 16
g job k 21 : 9 , 12 , 13 ,
type 18 : 10 , 19 Y : 6 , 16 14 , 16 22 : 20 ,
15 : 16 issue 55 : 15 56 : 22 kick 21, 24 24 : 6 ,
John ' s 7 , 11, 12
28 : 6 34 : 7 15 : 3 80 : 22 25 : 4 , 9 , 11 ,
44 : 11 , 12 14 , 18 26 : 16 ,
U. S . Legal Support www.uslegalsupport . com 18
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
19 , 22 , 25 81 : 2 , 5 , 10 , 71 : 14 leading
27 : 9 , 19 11, 23 83 : 5 laid 23 : 7
28 : 11 , 16 , 19 , 87 : 24 88 : 15 , 85 : 16 learn
21, 23 29 : 8 , 16 , 17 91 : 7 lake 13 : 4 18 : 2
13 , 21 , 23 92 : 23 93 : 2 , 5 : 16 11 : 2 , learned
30 : 1, 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 9 94 : 15 16 , 22 12 : 9 11 : 16 33 : 5
5 , 6 , 8 , 10 , 14 , 95 : 3 , 4 , 7 13 : 5 , 16 , 22 39 : 16
17 32 : 8 , 15 , 96 : 8 , 9 , 14 , 15 17 : 15 22 : 23 leave
23 33 : 11, 17 , 97 : 2 , 5 , 7 , 10 , 23 : 6 24 : 4 67 : 8
19 34 : 5 , 13 , 17 98 : 5 , 6 , 8 , 28 : 3 , 4 , 24 legal
20 , 24 35 : 16 15 , 23 , 25 29 : 18 38 : 8 , 5 : 19 95 : 14 ,
36 : 14 , 16 , 25 99 : 2 , 15 , 16 , 10 39 : 23 15 96 : 19
37 : 4 , 6 , 7 19 , 21 59 : 4 , 6 65 : 9 102 : 8
38 : 6 , 12 , 14 100 : 16 , 18 , 21 67 : 13 , 15
length
39 : 10 40 : 4 , 101 : 21 68 : 1, 2 105 : 5
5 , 8 , 9 , 11 102 : 10 , 20 75 : 10 , 21 lengthy
42 : 9 , 17 103 : 15 , 16 , 76 : 1, 9 86 : 1 5 : 25
43 : 10 , 25 21, 24 90 : 8 99 : 7 lesser
44 : 4 , 5 , 11 , 105 : 13 , 18 100 : 9 , 20
12 , 13 , 14 106 : 5 , 6 , 10 , 109 : 11 89 : 11
45 : 22 , 23 , 24 13 , 15 107 : 6 , lakefront lesson
46 : 4 , 6 , 8 , 14 19 , 21 110 : 14 100 : 12 , 14 39 : 16
47 : 2 , 9 , 11 , 112 : 2 , 6 , 14 , language lessons
16 , 17 , 18 , 22 18 , 24 113 : 11 5 : 3 114 : 25
48 : 4 , 8 knowledge large letter
49 : 22 , 23 11 : 1 23 : 1 28 : 20 94 : 20 69 : 1 91 : 7 ,
50 : 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 28 : 16 42 : 24 largely 13 , 22 92 : 4 ,
7 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 43 : 4 97 : 24 14 : 3 12 94 : 3 96 : 3
19 , 21 , 22 , 23 knowledgeable 101 : 4 102 : 21
52 : 10 , 11, 14 larger
23 : 20 71 : 16 29 : 12 45 : 8 letters
53 : 16 , 21, 22 , 82 : 7 92 : 14
23 54 : 3 , 5 , 7 , known largest level
8 , 21, 22 , 23 , 105 : 15
44 : 1 , 14 19 : 3 , 19
late 25 55 : 7 , 23 , 99 : 17 24 : 8 , 12
24 , 25 56 : 15 , 8 : 11 11 : 12 levels
19 , 21 57 : 1, lavatory 54 : 7
3 , 7 , 8 , 13 , 18 , L 53 : 22
liable
21, 22 , 23 , 25
lab lawns 95 : 24 101 : 6
58 : 6 59 : 10 15 : 17
61 : 3 62 : 22 55 : 22 licensed
laboratory lawsuit 55 : 13 , 14
65 : 3 67 : 4 y 95 : 17
69 : 24 70 : 2 , 9 54 : 24 55 : 24 layers licenses 71 : 21 72 : 2 , labs 87 : 21 105 : 3
3 , 6 , 9 75 : 12 , 54 : 22 56 : 21 laying licensing
22 76 : 4 , 19 , Lacey 17 : 21
101 : 12 licks
21, 24 77 : 19 39 : 22 , 25 lead
78 : 9 , 23 40 : 6 74 : 16 110 : 2
30 : 7 79 : 2 , 4 , 14 , 22 lack lie
80 : 2 , 6 , 8 , 17 84 : 19
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 19
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
life loadings looking Lower
14 : 25 109 : 7 48 : 7 8 : 8 , 15 , 23 111 : 10
limit local 28 : 22 30 : 13 lunch
5 : 1 11 : 12 69 : 13 31 : 5 44 : 21 12 : 24 21 : 24
limited 72 : 13 48 : 2 49 : 19 26 : 6
4 : 24 locally 54 : 19 70 : 16
line 72 : 13 74 : 23 83 : 16
40 : 20 67 : 14 , locate
88 : 22 92 : 20 M
19 68 : 5 83 : 6 99 : 2 105 : 18 made
73 : 12 89 : 1, 7 located 107 : 13 13 : 7 18 : 3
92 : 12 , 13 11 : 8 29 : 3 114 : 12 , 13 34 : 16 , 19
114 : 4 looks
locating 37 : 8 39 : 7
lines 59 : 12 8 : 9 9 : 16 63 : 21 64 : 15 ,
87 : 10 90 : 5 , location Lord 19 , 22 66 : 16
15 , 22 29 : 14 100 : 21 4 : 6 , 12 68 : 6 71 : 9 , 17
list logged lot 77 : 8 83 : 18 ,
5 : 25 7 : 23 24 : 15 8 : 7 10 : 4 , 6 , 23 84 : 1 90 : 1
65 : 4 70 : 21, logical 24 15 : 1 93 : 14 95 : 5 24 71 : 3 35 : 3 77 : 21 22 : 20 30 : 17 97 : 2 98 : 10
listen 46 : 13 55 : 23 99 : 8 103 : 2
logistically 69 : 5 70 : 15
100 : 16 58 : 9 107 : 25 108 : 4
101 : 18 71 : 17 72 : 1 109 : 8 , 13
long 73 : 8 78 : 7 113 : 1
listening 8 : 14 9 : 13
84 : 25 86 : 11
45 : 17 92 : 1 main
21 : 6 34 : 21
87 : 20 89 : 2
110 : 15 10 : 1 34 : 6
37 : 1 63 : 16 , 90 : 11 94 : 21 46 : 19
liter 20 , 22 72 : 12 97 : 6 , 18 , 20 ,
13 : 25 14 : 10 , 94 : 6 101 : 11 22 102 : 11 , 25 maintain
19 33 : 7 lon longer 36 : 5 , 22 54 : 7
g 103 : 3 104 : 25 94 : 18 95 : 2 ,
literally 21 : 8 105 : 1 106 : 21
104 : 2 5 , 13
Longwood 109 : 14 110 : 6 maintained
litigation 16 : 21 112 : 3
60 : 3 63 : 11 look Lotcuff 94 : 23
91 : 12 , 16 21 : 15 , 19 , 25 34 : 1, 24 35 ; 9 maintenance
92 : 20 95 : 24 45 : 24 46 : 10 ,
22 : 1 33 : 10 40 : 9 44 : 22 15 50 : 17 , 24
101 : 5 , 9 , 13 40 : 22 47 : 9 , 64 : 13 69 : 20 ,
little 15 , 23 5 3 : 5 24 72 : 4 73 : 6 52 : 1, 2 , 5 , 14
9 : 22 59 : 2 , 5 57 : 2
74 : 14 80 : 18 75 : 4 77 : 8 ,67 : 12 98 : 2 93 : 13 95 : 21 , 11, 19 82 : 6 make
106 : 3 22 102 : 2 89 : 1 97 : 22 5 : 6 18 : 2
lives 104 : 4 106 : 23 99 : 17 19 : 24 20 : 7
11 : 7 70 : 9 110 : 18 , 23 105 : 21, 25 25 : 12 26 : 22
72 : 13 111 : 2 , 3 , 9 106 : 5 112 : 4 32 : 24 , 25
living looked love 37 : 10 38 : 19: 14 5167 :
,: 14
6 : 21 17 : 1 35 : 22 , 3 2 : 6 108 : 23 39 398 ,
loading 25 76 : 12 low 21 71 : 2
46 : 14 48 : 10 92 : 14 108 : 15 67 : 16 , 19 72 : 20 73 : 10 ,
50 : 6 109 : 12 19 79 : 3 , 15
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 20
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
81 : 18 82 : 13 21 : 25 26 : 21 Mayor' s 24 79 : 5 , 24
89 : 5 93 : 6 33 : 15 , 18 , 20 92 : 13 80 : 5 , 7 88 : 15
94 : 11 95 : 19 , 38 : 22 45 : 1 mayors 93 : 14 , 15
23 , 25 96 : 13 , 51 : 7 , 9 102 : 7 97 : 12 100 : 12
25 98 : 24 52 : 16 , 22 Mccann 105 : 18
99 : 11 manufacturers 3 : 3 , 7 , 8 4 : 3 , means
101 : 16 , 18 52 : 9 56 : 10 , 13 , 15 6 : 22 , 15 : 21 37 : 21
105 : 14 14 25 7 : 16 , 20 84 : 24 90 : 22
109 : 11 mark 8 : 1 10 : 10 , 95 : 23
113 : 24 96 : 2 20 , 22 17 : 5 meant
makers Mary 22 : 7 25 : 24 62 : 21 , 22
108 : 6 59 : 4 , 6 27 : 22 32 : 18 67 : 20
Makes massive 40 : 16 41 : 21 measure
22 : 5 41 : 5 104 : 5 44 : 19 48 : 22 , 54 : 6
making master 25 49 : 3 media
20 : 25 48 : 19 42 : 5 , 6 51 : 21 53 : 1 44 : 25
50 : 9 52 : 22 mater 58 : 12 65 : 6 meet
63 : 3 81 : 18 76 : 1 66 : 6 , 8 , 24 8 : 5 25 : 6 , 9
89 : 21 99 : 25 material 67 : 11 71 : 6 , 9 27 : 1 45 : 9
man 30 : 19 48 : 6 , 7 72 : 25 77 : 1, 49 : 22 81 : 4 materials 5 , 20 78 : 18 , meeting
manage 35 : 22 46 : 1 20 79 : 10 3 : 4 4 : 1 , 20 74 : 10 47 : 21 81 : 6 82 : 11, 5 : 8 , 20 , 25
management Matt 22 83 : 16 , 18 , 6 : 1 , 6 10 : 12
22 , 25 84 : 15 11 : 14 12 : 23
18 : 24 51 : 12 , 3 : 11 85 : 4 , 10
24 matter 26 : 23 27 : 10
manager 86 : 19 87 : 4 43 : 14 49 : 8
4 : 22 59 : 16 89 : 25 91 : 1, 51 : 3 56 : 23
3 : 19 12 : 7 , 79 : 17 91 : 19 4 , 9 , 14 , 20
16 , 21 13 : 2 57 : 9 , 15
101 : 11 113 : 9 93 : 6 , 19
21 : 24 26 : 7 maxi 95 : 10 96 : 16 66 : 18 74 : 16 ,
43 : 16 58 : 21 99 : 12 97 : 1 98 : 9 17 , 21 75 : 2 , 7
66 : 19 68 : 6 76 : 11 , 15
74 : 2 , 5 85 : 25 maximize 99 : 1 100 : 2 , 77 : 13 89 : 23 ,
88 : 19 92 : 11 90 : 20 23 101 : 1, 25 25 91 : 3
93 : 20
mayor 103 : 10 100 : 4 112 : 8 ,103 : 19 , 23 , 25 7 : 11 8 : 1 107 : 25 9 114 : 5 , 11
104 : 22 32 : 19 39 : 22 110 : 10 meetings
40 : 6 , 16 111 : 12
106 : 7 , 12 112 : 19 74 : 13
113 : 7 114 : 1 , 48 : 25 68 : 24 meets
71 : 9 , 11 73 : 3 113 : 15
24 114 : 3 , 9 , 17 , 27 : 7 50 : 13
managers 74 : 16 79 : 10 56 : 17 89 : 9
104 : 13 82 : 11 83 : 19 20 , 23 member
84 : 1, 7 87 : 7 mean
manor 90 : 2 91 : 6 12 : 19 14 : 3 5 : 4
24 : 5 97 : 1 99 : 1 19 : 13 38 : 20 members
manufactured 102 : 23 53 : 14 65 : 12 , 108 : 7
66 : 10 103 : 10 110 : 3 15 69 : 7 , 10 membrane
manufacturer 113 : 16 70 : 12 72 : 13 , 30 : 11 , 24
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 21
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
31 : 16 , 24 minimum motion 47 : 15 , 18
memo 109 : 19 71 : 2 , 6 , 9 51 : 9 53 : 10
36 : 17 minute 81 : 12 , 14 60 : 23 65 : 3
memorandum 15 : 11 , 12 , 14 82 : 12 , 14 , 22 67 : 25 68 : 17 ,
53 : 4 37 : 25 38 : 1 83 : 10 , 18 , 23 19 69 : 6 , 9
memories 88 : 7 , 9 84 : 1 , 15 70 : 12 71 : 23
92 : 22 100 : 14 89 : 24 , 25 73 : 13 , 24
memory minutes 90 : 1 77 : 7 78 : 21
93 : 12 4 : 24 5 : 1 motivation 79 : 2 , 5 , 7 , 14
memos
10 : 13 99 : 3 , 112 : 20 80 : 9 , 17 62 : 19 16 move 81 : 16 82 : 21 ,
men missing 5 : 7 10 : 14 25 86 : 11
61 : 8 69 : 15 16 : 7 96 : 2 65 : 6 68 : 9 87 : 25 88 : 2
92 : 21 107 : 11 mistaken 71 : 23 73 : 24 90 : 18 , 20 , 24
mentioned
6 : 16 85 : 20 87 : 4 101 : 10 92 : 22 101 : 23
:
16 10320
25 : 4 27 : 14 mistakes 108 : 10 : 20
58 : 2 77 : 13 18 : 3 71 : 17 110 : 2 , 17
106 : 19
91 : 25 103 : 1 , 6 moved 22 : 12 75 : 12 107 : 7 , 14 , 17 ,
MO
met 81 : 15 22 108 : 5
18 : 8 35 : 1 , 2 89 : 5 113 : 25
method Model multi-million
10 needed
15 :
77 : 13 38 : 15 15 : 3 45 : 6
methods models multi-year 90
38 : 21 : 15 65 : 20 75 : 20
81 : 13 86 : 14 92 : 19
mic moderate needing
100 : 25 94 : 12 N 65 : 25 105 : 20
microfiber modifications needs
38 : 16 39 : 6 69 : 23 name 16 : 2 17 : 17
milligram modifying 7 : 2 2 10 : 24 21 : 5 27 : 1
44 : 23 17 : 8 , 11
13 : 25 45 : 7 68 : 17
milligrams moment 26 : 14 28 : 10 73 : 25 88 : 7
14 : 10 , 19
10 : 11 69 : 5 70 : 17 94 : 22 96 : 11
81 : 3 25 0 :
33 : 7 money 8025 103 : 12
million 11 : 21 45 : 16 104 : 20
11 : 16 , 21 89 : 2 90 : 11 nature 106 : 16
13 : 15 3 9 : 3
102 : 12 103 : 3 12 : 15 107 : 17
68 : 14 , 17 109 : 3 , 24 , 25 Nay negative
84 : 14 91 : 23
monitor
86 : 10 88 : 1,6 , 10 100 : 4 , 57 : 18 , 19 , 20 necessarily neighborhoods
11 103 : 4 Monroe 92 : 14 90 : 17
millions 22 : 23 28 : 3 , 4 necessary never
52 : 7 months 33 : 15 61 : 6 , 8 18 : 8 22 : 1
mind 23 : 16 82 : 21 96 : 6 , 14 35 : 1, 2 41 : 12
4 : 4 6 : 17 87 : 24 89 : 19 need 53 : 20 67 : 19
19 : 12 59 : 6 101 : 22 9 : 22 10 : 15 85 : 16 102 : 8
71 : 14 109 : 5 106 : 17 15 : 18 39 : 12 103 : 23
111 : 22 44 : 16 45 : 8
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 22
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
newer objective 38 : 6 , 15 , 24 74 : 11 , 15 , 21
41 : 8 13 : 13 105 : 6 40 : 3 , 15 43 : 3 76 : 18 79 : 24
nice obviously 48 : 21 49 : 11 80 : 21 , 22 , 23
8 : 5 8 : 7 10 : 1 51 : 18 52 : 20 , 86 : 19 88 : 25
night 30 : 7 33 : 16 25 53 : 10 , 13 96 : 7 98 : 3
98 : 3 34 : 17 , 20 54 : 6 56 : 4 , 6 107 : 1 108 : 19
nine 44 : 13 112 : 3 58 : 11 , 20 109 : 5 , 9 , 19
59 : 14 63 : 13 occurred 60 : 14 , 20 111 : 16
64 : 2 23 : 22 24 : 5 61 : 1, 15 , 25 ones
nods 37 : 17 74 : 13 , 62 : 13 , 14 , 24 21 : 16 55 : 8
114 : 13 15 105 : 2 64 : 2 , 5 66 : 5 , 111 : 8
non-existent October 14 , 23 76 : 15 online
111 : 5 26 : 12 34 : 8 78 : 14 81 : 23 32 : 22 34 : 11
43 : 14 66 : 18 , 83 : 18 84 : 16 35 : 17
61 : 14 62 : 4
normal 22 87 : 4 96 : 16 open 97 : 5 104 : 8
94 : 4 95 : 6 offer 7 : 21 65 : 13
note
82 : 15 83 : 13 105 : 12 107 : 5
09 : 8: 18 1
62 : 21 office 110808 : 1 1 opening
noted 81 : 21 111 : 25 113 : 4
26 : 12 officers 112 : 24 , 25 operates
notes 104 : 9 , 12 114 : 19 , 22 32 : 9
54 : 15 official Okeechobee operating
notice 60 : 7 91 : 17 15 : 1 57 : 24
95 : 16 96 : 6 , 20 older operation
notified 98 : 24 113 : 24 44 : 4 3 0 : 2 4 3 : 2 0
21 : 13 officially 50 : 17 , 24 51
number 3 9 : 2 5 4 2 : 2 1 4 52
42 : 7 once : 24 52 : 1,
5 : 17 , 18 9 : 3 , officials 50 : 7 56 : 24 2 , 5
17 : 20 operational
8 18 : 23 57 : 22 , 24
22 : 10 45 : 5 okay 66 : 15 95 : 15 50 : 16 51 : 25
47 : 12 94 : 8
4 : 15 , 16 one
54 : 10 57 : 5
98 : 16 108 : 4 6 : 12 , 22 , 25 5 9 6 : 15 operations
numbers 7 : 20 8 : 1 10 : 10 15 : 25 26 : 22 34 : 19
16 : 22 , 24 9 : 15 10 : 9 21 : 18 22 : 12 , 57 : 20 82 : 8
54 : 13 11 : 10 , 14 , 22 21 23 : 22 97 : 25
numerous 12 : 6 13 : 1 , 9 , 25 : 17 29 : 16 operator
95 : 7 21 14 : 24 31 : 10 , 18 , 20 , 56 : 25 57 : 14
15 : 9 17 : 4 22 36 : 5 39 : 5 operators
18 : 5 , 6 , 7 , 19 45 : 3 , 22 48 : 3 52 : 10 , 12
O 19 : 1 , 10 , 24 53 : 3 54 : 18 54 : 6 55 : 13 ,
20 : 10 , 21 58 : 8 59 : 25 21, 25 103 : 15
Oak 21 : 3 23 : 10 , 63 : 15 , 24 opinion
11 : 19 13 : 17 14 , 21 24 : 14 64 : 1 65 : 6 , 79 : 9 93 : 24
oath 25 : 20 , 23 23 , 24 66 : 7 96 : 17 , 19 , 25
79 : 13 103 : 25 26 : 13 27 : 11 , 69 : 8 70 : 17 , opportunities
113 : 8 21 28 : 5 , 14 18 71 : 19 97 : 12
objecting 32 : 3 34 : 7 , 15 72 : 19 73 : 21
60 : 15 , 17 36 : 9 37 : 23
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 23
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
opportunity panel particular people ' s
5 : 6 17 : 3 76 : 5 11 : 21 22 : 13 4 : 6 85 : 6
93 : 9 111 : 13 panels 23 : 8 100 : 8 87 : 15 105 : 2
optimally 24 : 1, 8 68 : 3 parties Perez
90 : 9 75 : 9 17 : 18 102 : 18 99 : 6
optimistic pans partner Perfect
68 : 20 99 : 4 19 : 9 52 : 20
option papers parts perfectly
49 : 12 26 : 14 45 : 6 17 : 13
order paperwork party perform
3 : 5 12 : 2 8 : 24 91 : 15 , 18 12 : 3 , 4
14 : 16 , 17 paragraph pass performance
49 : 12 , 13 13 : 14 31 : 21 , 45 : 8 13 : 5 , 21
ordered 22 passes 33 : 14 34 : 2 ,
3 : 25 parallel 84 : 15 11 39 : 23
ordinance 47 : 16 , 18 past 51 : 3 , 8 66 : 2
103 : 13 paraphrasing 6 : 25 29 : 21 performance,
ordinarily 58 : 25 74 : 6 103 : 2 110 : 5 you' re
60 : 5 Pardon pastures 90 : 10
organic 85 : 10 25 : 8 performing
36 : 14 38 : 3 , park path 12 : 14 32 : 23
8 , 9 , 17 27 : 13 , 15 102 : 3 , 19 , 25 33 : 1, 6 87 : 18
organization 67 : 22 84 : 22 pay 88 : 14
18 : 21 95 : 17 85 : 6 86 : 5 , 16 76 : 6 period
original 87 : 13 , 15 payer 52 : 19 , 21
70 : 21 parks 11 : 21 57 : 11 63 : 23
out-put 25 : 10 67 : 22 payers 65 : 8 , 22
14 : 9 100 : 10 68 : 22 67 : 16 106 : 4
output part payments periods
13 : 24 35 : 21 13 : 9 15 : 22 20 : 4 50 : 9 60 : 9 65 : 17
49 : 10 54 : 14 17 : 19 , 20 , 21 permit
peddle
outside 19 : 14 24 : 16 96 : 18 5 : 15 27 : 9
12 : 8 20 : 19 28 : 6 33 : 3 , 11 peddling 45 : 9 49 : 13
62 : 4 3 9 : 7 45 : 16 96 : 8 , 22 permits
overseas 49 : 16 , 25 80 : 19 , 22 , 23
45 : 1 60 : 2
55 : 15 60 : 12 Pending 87 : 9 , 19
72 : 16 , 19 permitted
107 : 22 people 2 13 : 10 , 11
P part-time 7 : 14 28 10 8 50 : 12
page 33 : 22 , 24 P
6 : 23 7 : 18 erson
participated 63 : 4 , 5 , 15 70 : 24 98 : 19
13 : 14 31 : 18 , 70 : 18 102 : 9
22 65 : 4 69 : 16
paid particle personally
72 : 10 73 : 9
88 : 9 89 : 2 45 : 8 78 : 25 79 : 6 9 : 13 43 : 25
98 : 14 104 : 19 Particles 94 : 24 103 : 21 77 : 14 80 : 13
Palm 45 : 23 109 : 6 110 : 7 pertaining
29 : 20 112 : 22 91 : 18
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 24
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
pf places 21 71 : 24 24 : 2 25 : 10
17 : 24 18 : 1 3 6 : 2 73 : 11 , 12 29 : 10 34 : 19
ph placing 74 : 12 , 21, 23 39 : 3 42 : 14 ,
29 : 7 , 9 34 : 1 20 : 24 75 : 2 , 8 , 13 15 , 23 44 : 5
47 : 10 plain 84 : 21 85 : 12 50 : 15 56 : 8 ,
phases 68 : 3 86 : 2 , 10 , 23 15 57 : 16
90 : 16 plan 88 : 11 , 15 , 20 , 65 : 23 67 : 6
phone 12 : 14 24 : 16 22 , 24 89 : 2 , 68 : 15 71 : 16
36 : 11 64 : 22 39 : 7 90 : 15 , 17 90 : 7 , 8 73 : 15 74 : 24
81 : 22 82 : 2 16 98 : 14 99 : 7 , 14 76 : 3 , 7 89 : 21
101 : 20 100 : 20 101 : 6 100 : 7 , 11 94 : 10 95 : 8
physically 110 : 2 , 18 103 : 14 , 16 99 : 11 112 : 24
80 : 3 planet 106 : 3 113 : 3 pointed
pick 51 : 14 plants 75 : 7 90 : 14
36 : 11 planners 15 : 18 22 : 14 pointing
pickleball 16 : 23 59 : 13 67 : 17 , 71 : 18 102 : 8
100 : 3 plans 19 74 : 11 poisitive
picture 50 : 11 , 23 85 : 14 , 15 92 : 14
23 : 17 56 : 16 57 : 15 89 : 8 102 : 12 police
piece 59 : 12 70 : 18 , 103 : 22 104 : 9 , 11, 14104 : 2 , 16
8 : 6 64 : 17 19 99 : 4 107 : 7
104 : 16 plant 105 : 20 107 : 3 , 4 , 6 policies
63 : 6 , 10
110 : 25 5 : 16 11 : 2 , 113 : 3 , 5 105 : 5 106 : 25
pier 16 , 18 , 22 plate
75 : 18 12 : 9 13 : 5 , 9 , policy
piling 21, 24 14 : 9 ,
player
38 : 9 11 : 25 36 : 1 ,
102 : 22 77 : 16
P g 24 15 : 19 23 59 : 21
20 : 18 21 : 5 , 9 60 : 7 , 23
pilot players 61 : 14 , 22 , 24
21 : 15 , 17 22 : 1, 14 , 16
23 : 1, 8 , 22 , 25 77 : 16 63 : 5 64 : 4
33 : 12 38 : 22
26 : 5 , 14 , 16 playing 95 : 6 107 : 2
106 : 23
27 : 25 29 : 1, 4 100 : 25 ponds
pipes
32 : 5 , 7 , 9 , 21 please 89 : 13
85 : 16 , 1819 34 : 10 35 : 17 3 : 6 4 : 5 , 7 population
88 : 5 110 : 22 38 : 11 , 17 5 : 23 62 : 12
9 . 19
piping 39 : 4 , 13 , 23 68 : 25 69 : 2
Porter
86 : 21
40 : 7 , 13 85 : 22 95 : 19 , 8 : 19 , 20 , 21
piss 42 : 12 , 15 20 107 : 21
portion
110 : 6
43 : 15 , 18 , 20 112 : 6 46 : 4
pit 46 : 3 , 7 47 : 7 pledge position
29 : 17 , 19 53 : 19 54 : 10 , 4 : 13 , 14 9 : 11 71 : 5
109 : 1 14 , 18 , 20 , 25 plugging 112 : 4
Pitbull 55 : 21 56 : 5 , 36 : 13 , 14 positive
113 : 12 7 , 13 57 : 4 , 5 , 38 : 2 106 : 1 103 : 7
place 10 58 : 5 , 18 , point
48 : 16 75 : 11 24 63 : 24 positively
5 : 21 6 : 8 75 : 1
79 : 3 , 8 66 : 2 67 : 13 , 14 : 4 17 : 25
103 : 20 107 : 3 18 68 : 4 , 18 , 19 : 16 21 : 10
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 25
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
possible preservation 80 : 16 97 : 23 produce
56 : 20 , 21 91 : 13 98 : 3 , 22 13 : 10 83 : 13
possibly preserve 99 : 18 104 : 7 85 : 17 96 : 6
48 : 2 65 : 9 60 : 5 91 : 14 , 105 : 16 111 : 19
85 : 1 109 : 24 18 113 : 22 produced
pot president problem 86 : 12
109 : 10 9 : 12 18 : 16 , 12 : 14 13 : 5 , 9 producing
potable 20 33 : 23 35 : 6 , 10 37 : 5 33 : 7 89 : 8 , 19
9 : 20 16 : 5 69 : 7 72 : 8 38 : 5 50 : 25 professional
110 : 24 111 : 7 presumably 56 : 4 66 : 12 4 : 11 71 : 3
potential 105 : 22 72 : 18 80 : 15 , 72 : 4
95 : 24 96 : 4 pretty 16 88 : 17 program
potentially 17 : 22 59 : 8 91 : 21 104 : 18 105 : 16
15 : 22 25 : 11 83 : 9 94 : 10 problems project
38 : 4 45 : 25 109 : 3 34 : 22 35 : 3 , 16 : 14 49 : 18
46 : 19 48 : 8 , 9 prevent 12 36 : 13 63 : 13 79 : 1, 8
54 : 21 95 : 17 105 : 10 68 : 4 , 11 88 : 25 94 : 15
2118 ,
powers previously 69 : projecting
5 : 12 84 : 20 88 : 20 100 : 7 16 : 2
prayer prices 102 : 7 106 : 14 projections
4 : 6 97 : 18 109 : 18 16 : 21
precise primarily 113 : 4 , 5 projects
75 : 19 67 : 21 procedurally 9 : 8 , 9 10 : 8
precluding primary 39 : 15 79 : 4 94 : 14 ,
94 : 16 18 : 25 74 : 22 procedure 19 97 : 21
prefer prime 53 : 14 54 : 1 104 : 6
82 : 17 111 : 6 procedures prone
preliminary prior 39 : 17 106 : 25 24 : 4 38 : 18
32 : 24 14 : 25 20 : 16 proceeding pronouncing
premo 22 : 13 , 16 96 : 7 17 : 7 45 : 12
100 : 22 23 : 18 74 : 5 proceedings proof
4 : 9 94 : 1 69 : 22
75 : 3 88 : 21
prepared process 50 : 12 69 : 20 99 : 15 p28 : 15 30 : 7 g proper
103 : 24 priority 63 : 20
presence 86 : 1 87 : 7 31 : 19 39 : 5 properly
4 : 10 privy 41 : 2 48 : 20 23 : 2 26 : 23
: 9 54: 7
present 23 : 8 , 9 , 23 550 : 54 , 19 , 43 : 8 52 : 7 , 23
2 , 10
3 : 8 , 10 6 : 1, 24 : 14 24 73 : 7 , 19 , 65 : 1
15 , 16 12 : 21 probably 24 94 : 5 property
80 : 3 18 : 17 22 : 11 97 : 17 100 : 12 , 14
presentations 23 : 5 28 : 21 102 : 13 , 14 , 17 proposal
4 : 16 30 : 13 37 : 16 107 : 23 , 24 41 : 3
presenting 39 : 1 40 : 25 processed propose
88 : 25 42 : 5 51 : 2 54 : 20 33 : 21 105 : 4
presently 58 : 5 65 : 20 ,
21 71 : 4
p y procurement proposed
11 : 7 105 : 5 99 : 13
73 : 14 75 : 11
U. S . Legal Support www.uslegalsupport . com 26
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
protect purpose 25 54 : 16 raise
63 : 8 64 : 6 13 : 18 15 : 8 , 59 : 9 , 22 7 : 6
prove 19 62 : 22 60 : 16 , 18 , 20 raised
56 : 17 , 22 86 : 15 61 : 10 , 16 , 21 99 : 6
57 : 14 purposes 69 : 19 74 : 2 rally
proven 86 : 6 77 : 9 86 : 20 97 : 11
41 : 17 pursued questioning ramp
provide 44 : 25 10 : 13 40 : 20 92 : 20
52 : 10 78 : 2 purview questionings ranch
provided 63 : 20 78 : 5 14 : 25
6 : 3 12 : 11 push questions ranchers
53 : 8 55 : 5 95 : 2 , 8 98 : 7 6 : 9 7 : 24 15 : 1
77 : 18 pushes 11 : 23 17 : 24 range
providing 91 : 23 18 : 1, 4 19 : 12 31 : 21
49 : 17 55 : 11 put 20 : 14 22 : 10 , ranked
PSS 14 : 7 29 : 25 13 23 : 6 , 21 94 : 10
54 : 7 30 : 14 37 : 25 25 : 20 26 : 2 , rarely
public 38 : 16 48 : 16 11 40 : 20 42 : 7
4 : 18 , 22 , 23 49 : 9 60 : 14 43 : 24 51 : 19
58 : 14 61 : 9 rate
74 : 17 90 : 1 64 : 4 67 : 13 , 88 : 12 , 13
108 : 17 , 18 24 68 : 14 62 : 11 71 : 5
114 : 11 79 : 3 , 13 77 : 10 , 12 rates
pulling 85 : 18 88 : 7 ,
78 : 8 , 10 80 : 6 49 : 23 50 : 1, 6 28 : 6 90 : 21 16 94 : 23 81 : 5 92 : 2 rationale
PUMP 100 : 15 , 20
98 : 4 , 18 72 : 24
103 : 20 107 : 2 105 : 24 re-cap
15 : 4 , 6 , 8 , 11 , quick 67 : 12
12 , 13 88 : 2 , 109 : 10 , 11
13 113 : 8 , 20 , 23 51 : 23 102 : 2 re-subpoenaed
pumped puts quickly 83 : 3
89 : 16 60 : 18 49 : 9 101 : 20 reach
putting 111 : 24 64 : 23 69 : 13
pumping 112 : 17 77 : 22 82 : 19
13 : 16 90 : 11 , 48 : 2 12 quite 83 : 8
11 : 23 17 : 23 reached
pumps Q 68 : 15 71 : 18 35 : 9 59 : 11
15 : 2 , 16 78 : 7 69 : 17 72 : 10
quality purchase q Y quote 81 : 16 97 : 8
45 : 4 23 : 17 31 : 20 6 : 7 read
purchased 41 : 18 46 : 16 5 : 25 6 : 5
45 : 3 48 : 3 50 : 4 53 : 18 12 : 10 69 : 14
purge 54 : 11 , 19 R 74 : 6 85 : 2
59 : 15 , 17 65 : 9 89 : 8 86 : 11
62 : 4 64 : 3 question radios
20 : 6 22 : 2 104 : 9 reading
92 : 23 93 : 8 27 : 12 84 : 22
purported 24 : 2 27 : 11 rails
32 : 5 40 : 9 3 9 : 9 ready
69 : 19 57 : 4 102 : 11
purportedly 43 : 6 45 : 9 rainbow real
51 : 23 53 : 3 , 109 : 1
105 : 22 22 : 18 65 : 18
U. S . Legal Support www.uslegalsupport . com 27
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
67 : 1 100 : 22 recommendatio referring rely
102 : 2 n 31 : 2 , 5 55 : 11
reality 49 : 15 refiltering remaining
27 : 12 recommendatio 90 : 12 45 : 8 98 : 4
realize ns reflect remains
8 : 14 3 3 : 2 2 3 0 : 6 4 : 11 35 : 8 , 12 105 : 6
reason recommended refresh remember
25 : 13 59 : 20 30 : 11 , 24 92 : 22 93 : 12 12 : 9 26 : 8
72 : 15 76 : 17 31 : 16 38 : 23 96 : 13 41 : 2 59 : 1 , 2 ,
80 : 24 86 : 15 recommending refuse 5 75 : 10
87 : 12 102 : 3 , 3 1 : 2 3 6 0 : 2 1 61 : 16 remembering
17 106 : 3 reconsider refused 4 : 7 , 11
reasonable 109 : 20 64 : 14 69 : 24 remind
13 : 20 51 : 5 record 72 : 6 5 : 3 108 : 19
reasoning 3 : 24 4 : 1 regard reminder
19 : 20 7 : 12 , 20 14 : 2 37 : 13 5 : 20 10 : 11
reasons 27 : 9 36 : 21, regarding remove
98 : 15 , 17 23 60 : 12 39 : 23 40 : 12 67 : 7
109 : 14 61 : 14 , 22 , 23 58 : 18 66 : 12 removed
112 : 21 84 : 3 86 : 1 regular 48 : 5
recall 89 : 12 94 : 14 36 : 23 59 : 8 , removing
12 : 15 58 : 22 108 : 21 21 61 : 22 , 23 75 : 25
received 113 : 9 , 16 regulations repair
40 : 5 recorded 109 : 17 37 : 5 74 : 11
recently 113 : 17 regulatory 76 : 7
18 : 17 80 : 25 recordings 17 : 21 repeat
reciprocal 53 : 11 reissue 18 : 3 103 : 1, 6
94 : 22 records 82 : 22 105 : 18
reciting 35 : 17 , 25 reject replaced
14 : 12 , 14 36 : 22 59 : 18 89 : 13 75 : 9
reclaim 62 : 3 , 5 63 : 4 , rejected replacing
22 : 13 25 : 6 10 , 14 64 : 3 , 99 : 14 44 : 23
reclaimed 16 70 : 16 related report
5 : 16 9 : 1 92 : 17 , 21 5 : 15 17 : 24 12 : 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ,
93 : 6 , 9 95 : 2 ,
15 : 23 17 : 16 13 : 6 , 9 9 : 2 relationship 11 17 : 2
2 5 : 5 2 7 : 2 0 13 , 12 18 , 4 , 8 : 10 21 : 7 , 12 23 : 14 72 : 18
29 : 11 , 19 96 : 2 97: 41 : 10 22 : 4 34 : 21 87 : 17
31 : 6 86 : 4 , yg 37 : 1, 7 44 : 8 103 : 17 , 19
rectifying 13 , 23 113 : 3 63 : 21 , 22 , 25 106 : 11 107 : 4
reclamation 20 : 17 91 : 23 92 : 5 112 : 1 113 : 25
84 : 25 85 : 14 redistributed 93 : 25 94 : 18 , reported
recollection 89 : 14 22 95 : 1 39 : 9 , 10
96 : 14 reduce 106 : 23 72 : 21
recommend 46 : 13 , 14 relative reporter
19 : 6 33 : 19 referenced 91 : 18 3 : 25 62 : 13
41 : 13 , 14 31 : 10 relied 79 : 23 113 : 17
99 : 19 9 : 7
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 28
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
reporting requiring resubpoena right
53 : 22 54 : 2 , 4 55 : 6 82 : 25 5 : 7 6 : 17
reports research results 7 : 7 , 25 8 : 11 ,
19 : 3 54 : 5 , 14 37 : 13 38 : 20 50 : 14 53 : 23 14 13 : 16
representatio reserve 55 : 9 14 : 21 15 : 2 ,
ns 14 : 20 retain 24 17 : 17
16 : 9 reset 74 : 19 18 : 10 20 : 3
representativ 10 : 18 retained 22 : 4 29 : 23
e resident 3 : 25 12 : 1 32 : 2 , 13
10 : 1 99 : 24 110 : 16 retention 40 : 10 41 : 20
representativ residents 36 : 1 , 23
43 : 4 45 : 12 ,
es 67 : 12 , 24 59 : 21 60 : 7 , 21 46 : 24 : 13 ,
49
4 : 25 6 : 14 86 : 21 8 , 12 , 23 20 48 : 14 14 51 :49
represented residual 61 : 14 , 22 , 24
59 : 7 , 9 63 : 13
63 : 4 , 10 95 : 6
5 : 19 14 : 8 55 : 1 64 : 11 , 13 , 15
request resolution 97 : 4 100 : 4
66 : 20 69 : 10
63 : 20 92 : 23 5 : 11 31 : 11 retired 71 : 24 72 : 17 ,
95 : 9 98 : 11 resolved 6 : 21 11 : 6
19 73 : 7 , 22
requested 59 : 16 63 : 15 , 16 75 : 19 78 : 16 ,
49 : 4 respect retrofitted 18 79 : 20
requests 108 : 24 29 : 24 45 : 7 80 : 10 81 : 19
95 : 12 respectfully return 82 : 13 87 : 11
require 36 : 9 85 : 11 68 : 23 106 : 18 89 : 5 , 10 , 11
33 : 20 52 : 9 respond returned 92 : 8 96 : 11
54 : 10 , 15 , 22 77 : 12 78 : 11 106 : 16 97 : 18 100 : 5 ,
55 : 4 , 9 , 16 , 20 112 : 20 reuse 20 101 : 6 , 25
57 : 14 responding 9 : 18 11 : 2 , 18 103 : 17 , 25
required 37 : 22 16 : 5 , 17 105 : 21
16 : 16 31 : 19 response 87 : 10 89 : 7 107 : 18
56 : 22 57 : 14 26 : 11 90 : 15 , 17 , 22 108 : 18
87 : 19 110 : 21 responses reused river
111 : 1 92 : 2 15 : 6 16 : 2 , 15 22 : 19
requirement responsibilit 89 : 9 90 : 21 Rivera
14 : 22 16 : 4 ies reverse 75 : 3
24 : 9 25 : 7 , 9 18 : 11 , 20 71 : 23 road
27 : 9 54 : 17 20 : 11 , 13 review 21 : 4 73 : 7
103 : 13 105 : 7 61 : 8 62 : 5 Rob
104 : 20 responsibilit 99 : 4 114 : 2 3 : 17
requirements reviewed role
14 : 20 27 : 7 y56 : 16 68 : 22 53 : 9 56 : 8 57 : 16
30 : 8 45 : 9 responsible revisions roles
49 : 22 50 : 14 57 . 2 99 : 8 18 : 25
51 : 9 52 : 16 revisit
rest roll
57 : 9 , 12
97 : 25 99 : 24 90 : 18 3 : 6
requires rid
14 : 18 83 : 11 restate room
82 : 11 96 : 22 4 : 10
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 29
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
roughly 54 : 15 63 : 9 secondary September
22 : 15 75 : 15 73 : 2 74 : 7 14 : 18 44 : 24 5 : 17 58 : 23
round 75 : 11 76 : 18 45 : 3 , 4 , 14 69 : 11 80 : 15
49 : 2 85 : 23 93 : 6 47 : 6 , 8 , 13 109 : 6 112 : 14
RP 95 : 8 , 21 85 : 6 septic
94 : 23 111 : 17 , 18 seconded 5 : 15
rules says 71 : 10 81 : 15 series
108 : 20 14 : 5 30 : 21 83 : 19 , 21, 23 23 : 21 47 : 17 ,
run 49 : 11 69 : 20 84 : 2 90 : 2 20 48 : 9
15 : 24 18 : 21 , 107 : 20 Section serious
23 26 : 21 110 : 20 , 25 5 : 12 44 : 12
49 : 21 56 : 12 , schedule see service
14 57 : 6 76 : 2 65 : 1 70 : 8 25 : 17 28 : 20 42 : 18 109 : 16
107 : 4 78 : 1 79 : 15 30 : 2 32 : 9 servicer
running scheduled 35 : 22 , 25 42 : 7
57 : 23 76 : 10 7 : 13 , 15 , 18 48 : 18 53 : 11 , services
113 : 2 , 3 79 : 22 101 : 23 12 73 : 15 42 : 5 , 22
scheduling 74 : 15 78 : 1 49 : 18 94 : 17
S 64 : 20 80 : 15 81 : 2 83 : 8 session
scope 84 : 17 85 : 12 4 : 18
13 : 13 20 : 19 92 : 3 101 : 6 ,
safe 60 : 11 13 107 : 14 , 18 set
6 : 18 65 : 8 1 10 24 : 10 26 : 21
safer scratch 67 : 15 , 18
75 : 13 41 : 12 seeing 114 : 6
sample
scratching 5 : 6 12 : 9 settles
167 70 5 , :
53 : 18 102 : 15 46 : 30 : 18
es sam
screen 84 : 4 108 : 17
2 P l seven
6 , 15 , 17 48 : 8 97 : 14 111 : 13 43 : 1 90 : 16
24 : 15 53 : 12 screens Segway 113 : 2
97 : 14 66 : 7
sanctions selected several
96 : 4 searching 64 : 12 97 : 13 ,
Sanford
62 : 23 94 : 7 15 22 : 22 23 : 12 season selection sewage
94 : 5 90 : 7
109 : 9
28 : 1 29 : 15 , send
16 30 : 3 seat 69 : 1 91 : 715 sewer
,
32 : 5 , 7 , 11 6 : 18 89 : 7 103 : 22
41 : 16 , 17 seated 92 : 4 93 : 16 104 : 2 113 : 2 ,
44 : 14 45 : 17 58 : 17 95 : 15 96 : 20 5
47 : 8 , 9 54 : 1 Seaward sense share
sat 110 : 13 22 : 5 23 : 24103 : 11
25 : 12 41 : 5
7 : 3 110 : 14 second 78 : 12 95 : 25 shared
satisfactory 4 : 16 31 : 18 98 : 6 105 : 13 48 : 1
30 : 23 48 : 2 49 : 1 separate Shawn
saying 68 : 1 71 : 7 , 8 25 : 6 55 : 16 3 : 19 12 : 16
24 : 25 31 : 15 75 : 2 83 : 16 , separately 21 : 13 26 : 7
35 : 10 , 13 17 76 : 13 89 : 11
43 : 11 46 : 21 55 : 9 , 17 91 : 25 100 : 19
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 30
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
103 : 25 simple soften specification
104 : 7 , 23 101 : 17 93 : 14 s
106 : 19 simpler solids 12 : 3 , 4 33 : 6 ,
Sheila 79 : 15 13 : 25 14 : 10 11, 12 , 14
110 : 13 simply 33 : 8 46 : 5 , 7 , 49 : 8 , 24
shoes 5 : 19 , 21 6 : 8 13 49 : 10 50 : 1, 11 , 13
64 : 4 67 : 12 68 : 8 , solution 51 : 8 52 : 8 , 15
show 13 87 : 22 33 : 21 54 : 13 55 : 19
30 : 4 32 : 16 92 : 16 95 : 24 solutions 56 : 18 , 23
105 : 20 single 68 : 11 57 : 10 , 15 , 22
shows 5 : 7 12 : 20 sort 105 : 21
64 : 24 sir 28 : 7 77 : 14 specifics
shut 6 : 17 8 : 5 113 : 20
10 : 7 47 : 15 ,
111 : 20 9 : 5 , 10 12 : 5 sound 24
sic
14 : 2 26 : 3 63 : 6 81 : 7 specified
77 : 11 , 19 35 : 24 43 : 2 sounded 3 8 : 2 1 4 6 : 2 0
45 : 13 51 : 6 , 49 : 19
83 : 19 92 : 9
side 17 , 20 58 : 19 sounds specify
86 : 24 101 : 13 62 : 9 63 : 1 13 : 20 40 : 23 92 : 19
sign 65 : 14 66 : 22 95 : 11 specs
19 : 10 20 : 5 , 9 sit source 57 : 13 59 : 12
51 : 15 95 : 16 18 : 19 37 : 12 38 : 7 , 11 89 : 18
signature 41 : 11 81 : 20 sources speculation
20 : 7 106 : 17 37 : 16 36 : 20
signatures
site space speculative
88 : 23 29 : 15 66 : 15 100 : 4 36 : 19
si ned 99 : 4 sP eak spend
4 : 8 26 : 13 , sitting ; 21 5 : 3 102 : 11
15 27 : 5 , 6 86 : 25 49 : 4 68 : 12 105 : 15 110 : 5
42 : 12 80 : 20 , situation 104 : 21 spending
21, 22 81 : 8 17 : 15 20 : 18 111 : 13 45 : 15 67 : 1
105 : 23 102 : 6 103 : 6 speaking 90 : 11 103 : 3
significant 105 : 1 5 : 23 11 : 25 spoke
18 : 22 46 : 4 size special 58 : 23
47 : 12 48 : 6 45 : 9 58 : 8 3 : 4 4 : 1 5 : 8 spray
significantly 99 : 14 specific 89 : 10
46 : 1, 11 smaller 5 : 10 11 : 1 spreadsheet
58 : 6 53 : 20
signing 37 : 12 38 : 20
19 : 22 54 : 9 , smith 42 : 1, 3 , 17 Spring
18 13 : 2 23 : 14 61 : 3 74 : 12 75 : 16
signs 44 : 13 53 : 4 106 : 8 Springs
20 : 2 58 : 21 87 : 17 specifically 3 : 5 21 : 7 , 8
similar
88 : 19 59 : 1 75 : 10 32 : 11 41 : 24 ,
22 : 14 29 : 7 soft 87 : 1 25 64 : 1
41 : 19 45 : 16 93 : 5 95 : 9 specification 88 : 10 110 : 14
46 : 2 54 : 10 , 96 : 8 , 17 , 21 49 : 23 51 : 10 sprinklers
13 75 : 15 88 : 4
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 31
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
St 44 : 23 51 : 2 submission supervisor
80 : 22 55 : 18 14 : 15 106 : 12
staff stated submit supervisors
10 : 5 16 : 20 46 : 22 47 : 25 54 : 4 77 : 10 107 : 3
51 : 24 52 : 3 83 : 25 95 : 6 78 : 10 supplement
53 : 24 68 : 9 statement submitted 67 : 21
69 : 17 72 : 17 24 : 3 38 : 19 44 : 21 supplementati
98 : 14 105 : 6 43 : 13 44 : 21 subpoena on
Staff-wise 77 : 18 7 : 17 19 : 14 9 : 2
44 : 2 105 : 22 , 23 20 : 20 40 : 2 supplier
stalled stay 60 : 12 , 13 21 : 14
112 : 15 5 : 24 64 : 24 65 : 5 supplies
stance step 70 : 24 , 25 55 : 25
77 : 9 6 : 17 67 : 11 72 : 6 77 : 3 supply
stand steps 82 : 9 , 14 , 22 52 : 9 84 : 24
7 : 4 , 6 58 : 24 39 : 18 56 : 6 83 : 4 , 11 85 : 1 86 : 4 , 21
67 : 7 74 : 8 sting 102 : 20 112 : 5 support
standard 92 : 24 subpoenaing 48 : 1 81 : 12
14 : 1, 16 stonewalling 70 : 3 supporting
53 : 14 , 19 110 : 16 subpoenas 25 : 16
54 : 1 58 : 3 stop 40 : 1 64 : 21 suppose
standards 17 : 2 41 : 24 71 : 18 112 : 20 13 : 22 , 24
14 : 18 25 : 6 , 9 storage substandard 88 : 11 , 12
26 : 24 27 : 10 11 : 18 13 : 15 , 87 : 14 89 : 13 supposed
89 : 9 17 29 : 16 , 17 , substantial 13 : 10 15 : 11
standing 19 87 : 3 68 : 4 67 : 25
63 : 20 , 22 straight success sure
standpoint 4 : 17 77 : 23 4 : 5 18 : 2
19 : 10 97 : 25 stream suction 26 : 23 , 25
start 46 : 18 47 : 8 , 75 : 20 31 : 9 32 : 24 ,
21 : 19 24 : 16 22 sudden 25 38 : 19
26 : 20 33 : 4 struck 64 : 24 39 : 14 , 16
56 : 13 63 : 9 23 : 24 suggest 42 : 10 52 : 4 ,
84 : 19 structure 23 : 4 6 , 23 53 : 17
start-up 28 : 20 suggested 57 : 9 , 12 , 21
35 : 12 50 : 25 studied 98 : 13 63 : 6 , 10
51 : 1 56 : 10 , 87 : 9 suggesting 71 : 20 , 25
18 , 24 57 : 4 studies 16 : 13 72 : 20 73 : 19
58 : 1 63 : 23 9 : 24 17 : 18 suggestion 77 : 2 78 : 17
65 : 17 , 22 study 101 : 3 , 16 79 : 3 83 : 9 , 12
started 86 : 3 , 9
9 : 1 , 16 , 17 113 : 1
7 : 24 69 : 10 suited 102 : 12 , 24
16 : 2 31 : 7 , 8 ,80 : 14 15 , 25 22 : 11 105 : 14 111 : 8
starting stuff summary 112 : 22
35 : 6 32 : 24 70 : 15 114 : 14 surprised
state subject summer 24 : 3
17 : 20 4 1 : 6 4 : 2 2 91 : 19 53 : 15
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 32
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
surrounding 33 : 15 37 : 10 tanks terms
17 : 15 44 : 16 47 : 21 87 : 3 95 : 14 , 15
susceptible 48 : 6 52 : 6 tax Terrace
38 : 17 57 : 1, 12 58 : 9 11 : 21 68 : 22 108 : 23
suspect 60 : 22 72 : 8 , taxpayer Terry
98 : 12 12 73 : 24 109 : 24 6 : 20 9 : 25
suspended 76 : 14 , 20 , 21 taxpayer ' s 22 : 11 24 : 7 ,
13 : 25 14 : 10 78 : 16 83 : 10 73 : 20 104 : 19 13 25 : 3
3 3 : 8 49 : 10 8 6 : 9 102 : 25 taxpayers 33 : 24 34 : 6 ,
suspiscion 110 : 2 , 17 88 : 10 89 : 2 8 , 9 , 13 35 : 1 ,
87 : 16 111 : 3 , 9 , 13 112 : 24 2 36 : 11
swear taken team 37 : 16 41 : 2
7 : 7 23 : 6 , 15 , 17 107 : 16 44 : 6 53 : 8
switch 24 : 15 38 : 12 technology 74 : 15 75 : 5
56 : 7
56 : 16 102 : 19 23 : 12 29 : 24 77 : 7 , 10 , 19 ,
takes 20 , 21 82 : 14
sworn 50 : 24 92 : 24 10 32 : 6 41 : 6 , 8 , 83 : 11
s stem taking Ted Terry' s
y 9 : 18 42 : 16 81 : 2
12 : 2 , 4 22 : 23 3 : 13
23 : 7 , 18 110 : 3 telephone test
talk 21 : 17 55 : 1
24 : 20 , 22 37 : 15 44 : 6 79 : 12 80 : 17 57 : 6 76 : 10
25 : 15 27 : 2 , 87 : 23 98 : 19
20 28 : 8 , 9 , 59 : 8 61 : 2 telephonic 109 : 9
10 , 12 , 22 , 25 63 : 14 64 : 16 , g3 : 14 tested
29 : 2 , 5 , 6 , 12 23 65 : 3 51 : 14
79 : 5 , 6 telephonicall
38 : 16 39 : 15 testify
40 : 24 41 : 5 , talked y 79 : 20 82 : 16
13 , 18 44 : 23 tell
11 : 19 13 : 3 82 : 16 , 17 112 : 25
45 : 16 46 : 21 34 : 8 , 22 44 : 3 testimony
59 : 2 , 5 98 : 14 7 : 7 48 : 19
48 : 17 49 : 7 51 : 9 60 : 23 , 7 : 1 59 : 3
72 : 20 85 : 12 talking 25 61 : 2 , 3 83 : 10 87 : 23
86 : 13 99 : 13 12 : 22 20 : 23 testing
27 : 13 28 : 17 70 : 25 86 : 25 g
110 : 22 111 : 5 89 : 18 97 : 5 21 : 15 26 : 16 ,
systemic 35 : 11 , 15 20 27 : 1
: :412 5123 telling
39 : 15 61 : 20 , 21 32 : 24 33 : 13
systems 59 : 1 61 : 5 34 : 10 , 17
85 : 9 86 : 16 tells 38 : 22 54 : 3 ,
9 : 1 21 : 18 100 : 3 18 : 6 61 : 18
25 : 7 30 : 10 24 55 : 8 , 14 ,
47 : 20 79 : 7 taling ten 24 56 : 20
86 : 24 60 : 10 10 : 13 59 : 14 58 : 1 65 : 17
talks 62 : 7 63 : 13 tha
31 : 18 64 : 2 102 : 14 , 111 : 1
T tall 16 thank
take 28 : 21 term 3 : 21 4 : 1
21 : 6 34 : 21
6 : 4 , 18 7 : 1 tank 37 : 1 71 : 15 7 : 10 , 16 8 : 4
11 : 18 13 : 16 , 22 : 6 25 : 22
13 : 22 21 : 15 , terminated
17 100 : 4 31 : 12 32 : 17
25 32 : 8
42 : 8 40 : 16 41 : 20
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 33
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
44 : 18 48 : 21 16 : 7 18 : 13 94 : 9 112 : 20 told
51 : 18 52 : 17 , 21 : 1, 10 , 11 throw 34 : 13 37 : 2
20 58 : 11 22 : 2 23 : 19 102 : 20 44 : 3 66 : 3 , 15
62 : 14 63 : 1 25 : 3 28 : 15 throwing 72 : 14 107 : 17
64 : 18 66 : 5 , 30 : 5 35 : 21 56 : 7 109 : 2 tomorrow
8 , 23 , 25 38 : 25 39 : 19 Tiana 69 : 2
67 : 3 , 7 , 9 , 10 40 : 1 45 : 22 3 : 15 tonight
71 : 13 87 : 5 , 7 49 : 16 53 : 10 Tim 7 : 13 , 15 8 : 4
91 : 4 110 : 9 58 : 10 60 : 17 51 : 19 67 : 1
34 : 1 35 : 9
111 : 12 , 14 , 15 62 : 15 63 : 17 , time 81 : 25 83 : 5
114 : 8 , 22 21 64 : 8 67 : 6 84 : 20 98 : 13
that, i 'm 68 : 11 69 : 14 8 : 14 , 2: 19 , 20 9 : 15 108 : 24
: 5
28 : 17 72 : 11 , 15
73 : 7 , 9 , 10 11 : 23 12 : 12 top
thiacin 13 : 4 , 7 15 : 3 , 94 : 9
47 : 10 75 : 23 77 : 15 , 24 18 : 12 , 13 topic
thin 16 78 : 9 , 21, 21 : 13 22 : 6 5 : 24 84 : 17
16 : 9 25 79 : 5 , 6 27 : 4 28 : 19 total
thing 81 : 14 , 15 , 16 35 : 4 36 : 3 13 : 24 14 : 9
10 : 6 15 : 16 83 : 1 85 : 23 41 : 10 43 : 17 22 : 5 33 : 8
22 : 18 23 : 24 87 : 21 89 : 5 , 6 50 : 15 52 : 11 , 38 : 8 49 : 10
24
28 : 7 30 : 23 90 : 13 , 21 63 : 16 , 23 totality
32 : 12 36 : 5 , 93 : 2 94 : 5 , 21 64 : 6 , 25 86 : 3 , 13
24 , 25 44 : 17 96 : 9 97 : 11, 65 : 1, 12
50 : 10 , 20 17 101 : 17 66 : 11 67 : 1 , touching
105 : 3 , 8 107 : 13
54 : 3 , 5 55 : 20 106 : 19 , 22 , 24 16 73 : 20 tour
57 : 13 58 : 6 107 : 2 , 7 , 8 , 75 : 19 , 22 30 : 3 32 : 9
65 : 15 72 : 19 , 21, 22 79 : 20 84 : 3 track
23 81 : 8 108 : 23 , 24 88 : 4 92 : 24 94 : 12
85 : 24 90 : 13 109 : 2 , 3 , 7 , 93 : 22 94 : 6 traditional
104 : 15 , 16 95 : 22 , 23
111 : 16 12 , 20 , 21 106 : 4 110 : 4 , 4 : 19
112 : 13 110 : 1 , 6 , 8 5 111 : 9 train
112 : 12 52 : 12 , 13
things 112 : 11
6 : 10 8 : 6 113 : 22 , 25 113 : 13 training
114 : 1 , 3 , 24 52 : 3 , 10
10 : 4 19 : 25 114 : 18
23 : 22 37 : 10 thinking timeline 56 : 25 109 : 19
47 : 1 49 : 25 45 : 21 48 : 18 transactions
84 : 1 98 : 10 6 : 10
50 : 2 , 5 63 : 9 times 105 : 6
65 : 18 74 : 22 thought g 10 : 15 24 : 11 transcript
79 : 2 97 : 14 , 87 : 13 104 : 7 , 54 : 23 , 24 74 : 7
15 100 : 10 24 , 25 transcripts
106 : 19 , 21 55 : 21 67 : 25 P
104 : 4 105 : 10 84 : 20 9 5 : 7 80 : 7
107 : 13 , 14 thread 97 : 18 transmissions
108 : 9 48 : 12 today 104 : 10
think three 6 : 3 18 : 19 traveling
6 : 7 8 : 9 9 : 6 , 4 : 24 45 : 2 , 14 41 : 11 58 : 17 47 : 11
22 11 : 15 47 : 6 , 8 , 13 100 : 18 treatment
12 : 7 , 13 13 : 1 62 : 11 87 : 24 14 : 23 29 : 4 ,
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 34
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
10 31 : 19 twice 72 : 14 units
89 : 17 102 : 12 10 : 18 uh 30 : 1, 3 44 : 24
107 : 4 two 18 : 21 , 24 47 : 18 , 19
trouble 6 : 13 10 : 16 3 9 : 2 5 40 : 19 University
37 : 3 59 : 12 13 : 14 30 : 10 80 : 18 16 : 22
63 : 25 33 : 24 38 : 25 Uh-huh unreasonable
trucks 39 : 18 47 : 10 20 : 15 40 : 21 100 : 2
104 : 17 58 : 9 61 : 8 unaware unsigned
true 63 : 15 67 : 3 88 : 20 69 : 19
96 : 23 98 : 13 69 : 9 , 15 , 23 unbelievably unusual
truth 74 : 13 77 : 16 89 : 20 47 : 20
7 : 7 , 8 84 : 19 90 : 16 9 3 : 7 uncommon updated
try 95 : 11 , 12 , 13 , 48 : 4 54 : 8 110 : 19
63 : 4 , 5 , 17 20 97 : 13 understand ups
64 : 17 69 : 12 110 : 9 111 : 19 14 : 1 16 : 6 21 : 19
70 : 7 , 11 two-step 17 : 16 , 17 , 22 usage
77 : 25 80 : 3 39 : 5 20 : 23 27 : 12 45 : 6
89 : 4 93 : 4 type 28 : 17 43 : 6 utilities
101 : 19 10 : 6 28 : 24 62 : 15 , 16
50 : 20 54 : 3 , 5 9 : 8 24 : 21
trying 68 : 18 70 : 22 59 : 10 68 : 15
8 : 6 19 : 18 55 : 14 , 20 73 : 2 87 : 21
72 : 5
37 : 4 , 5 39 : 2 , 57 : 13 60 : 9 103 : 5 110 : 15 utility
14 40 : 22 73 : 17 82 : 23 understanding 24 : 25 34 : 1,
48 : 17 62 : 14 , 107 : 6 111 : 3 4 : 8 6 : 2 , 11, 25 35 : 9 75 : 4
20 63 : 11, 12 typed 12 , 15 7 : 14 , utilization
64 : 5 , 14 , 16 , 11 : 23 16 9 : 9 , 21 16 : 17
25 68 : 8 73 : 1 types 14 : 2 , 3 15 : 21
74 : 2 , 19 76 : 8 18 : 1 50 : 2 16 : 18 17 : 15 utilized
108 : 11 16 : 5 23 : 12
92 : 7 94 : 11, 21 : 20 24 : 13
21 97 : 10 typical 27 : 19 28 : 24
98 : 7 99 : 11 54 : 17 29 : 12 , 22 V
TSD typically 33 : 13 38 : 21 ,
109 : 16 16 : 25 19 : 7 23 43 : 21 value
TSS 20 : 4 21 : 9 52 : 5 65 : 24 69 : 7 104 : 19
45 : 9 55 : 1 27 : 8 33 : 3 67 : 14 68 : 9 valves
89 : 9 42 : 20 , 22 81 : 7 , 13 85 : 5 113 : 4
tune 46 : 25 47 : 18 94 : 18 various
99 : 9 49 : 17 , 25 understood 17 : 22
turn 50 : 17 52 : 8 , 13 : 18 , 19 vary
102 : 18 14 56 : 9 , 11, 14 : 5 , 11 15 : 5 60 : 9
104 : 23 13 , 15 57 : 3 , 28 : 6 46 : 21 varying
106 : 22 13 58 : 5 , 9 unfolded 50 : 2
turned 105 : 2 vendors
34 : 18 U unit 17 : 22
Tuscawilla 21 : 16 verified
87 : 10 90 : 23 UCF unitl 27 : 2
111 : 6 11 : 9 , 13 89 : 25
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 35
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
verify 114 : 10 , 15 21, 22 , 23 winter
49 : 21 50 : 10 wanted 75 : 20 , 21 3 : 5 21 : 7 , 8
54 : 23 55 : 22 11 : 22 39 : 20 76 : 6 84 : 21, 23 : 16 32 : 11
viable 58 : 6 74 : 1 25 85 : 1 , 13 , 41 : 23 , 25
101 : 13 87 : 12 92 : 9 16 , 17 , 19 64 : 1 88 : 10
video 100 : 23 109 : 6 86 : 4 , 6 , 8 , 16 110 : 14
70 : 11 , 14 warranty 87 : 14 88 : 11 , wiped
view 52 : 19 106 : 18 12 89 : 9 , 12 , 68 : 3
24 : 2 39 : 4 wash 17 , 20 90 : 7 , wisdom
volume 45 : 24 46 : 1, 21 102 : 12 99 : 23
3 5 : 2 0 36 : 15 11 4 9 : 2 3 110 : 24 111 : 7 wishes
vote 50 : 1, 6 113 : 3 4 : 21
91 : 9 112 : 11 washed way withdraw
voted 6 5 : 2 0 6 6 : 1 9 : 4 14 : 7 48 : 24 101 : 3 ,
70 : 3 waste 16 : 1 20 : 19 16
29 : 4 46 : 2 , 6 36 : 5 46 : 17 withdrew
54 : 25 57 : 5 , 6 47 : 3 48 : 15 78 : 19
W 58 : 5 89 : 17 51 : 15 59 : 25 witness
90 : 7 102 : 12 78 : 6 79 : 21 61 : 11 , 13
wait 109 : 24 81 : 4 83 : 2
77 : 4 100 : 13 92 : 18 , 24 witnessed
watching 57 : 25
walked 93 : 5 , 11 96 : 4
69 : 17 100 : 9 108 : 4 witnesses
wall water ways 71 : 25 82 : 15
5 : 15 9 : 1, 18 , 111 : 19
20 11 : 2
75 : 13 62 : 7 85 : 24
women
Walt 13 : 11 , 17 , 22 , went 107 : 11
23 14 : 17 , 23 wonderful
8 : 20 8 : 15 17 : 17
want 15 : 6 , 23 21 : 18 , 20 , 21111 : 11
16 : 5 , 15 94 : 9 102 : 4 43 : 23
15 : 24 17 : 14 2 , 29 : 22 44 : 23 wondering
22 : 24 23 : 11 17 : 2 66 : 15 68 : 2 g
28 : 19 , 23
23 : 6 , 18
35 : 15 47 : 1 west word
24 : 11 , 15 24 : 24 42 : 16
25 : 5 , 8 72 : 8 102 : 20
50 : 19 60 : 6 32 : 12 86 : 24
61 : 11 64 : 6 whatsoever
27 : 13 , 15 , 19 , 103 : 23
70 : 11 , 25 20 2 8 : 7
63 : 18
71 : 14 , 20 29 : 4 , 11 wide words
73 : 19 80 : 11 , 30 : 18 , 19 , 20 , 39 : 15 39 : 11 49 : 8
13 81 : 21, 22 22 , 23 31 : 6 , William 58 : 25 59 : 16
82 : 5 83 : 14 20 33 : 7 10 : 24 33 : 24 63 : 11 74 : 9 ,
87 : 22 89 : 23 38 : 7 , 10 , 11 34 : 4 , 8 , 9 25 75 : 23
91 : 11 95 : 7 39 : 12 41 : 18 36 : 12 37 : 15 work
97 : 16 , 19 46 : 2 , 6 , 16 69 : 4 70 : 17 9 : 7 , 25 21 : 9 ,
98 : 17 , 20 50 : 4 51 : 12 71 : 2 80 : 21 18 33 : 19
99 : 22 102 : 9 , 53 : 12 , 18 82 : 14 83 : 10 37 : 10 39 : 13
13 , 17 103 : 1 54 : 11 , 19 , 25 Winds 43 : 13 45 : 19
105 : 14 57 : 5 , 7 58 : 5 67 : 21 84 : 21 50 : 8 51 : 16
109 : 20 , 25 65 : 9 , 13 85 : 5 86 : 5 52 : 12 53 : 21
111 : 2 67 : 16 , 17 , 19 , 87 : 13 , 15 55 : 21 56 : 19
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 36
City Commission Special Meeting SECOND CORRECTED
January 31, 2022
58 : 25 68 : 16 wrapped 114 : 3 zones
73 : 13 74 : 8 , 83 : 15 yeah,h 86 : 7
24 76 : 13 write 55 : 19 Zoom
89 : 3 97 : 13 49 : 14 96 : 9 year 77 : 13 78 : 3 , 4
106 : 16 107 : 9 114 : 2 11 : 13 15 : 3 79 : 14 , 25
110 : 7 writing 24 : 8 , 10 82 : 16 83 : 14
work-orders 103 : 18 67 : 25 90 : 16
42 : 6 113 : 24 97 : 9 , 13
worked written 105 : 17
10 : 3 , 8 26 : 11 43 : 13 years
16 : 13 , 19 , 21 , 46 : 23 , 25 8 : 11 9 : 6 , 14
23 34 : 25 53 : 12 , 19 11 : 6 16 : 4
37 : 9 39 : 4 96 : 4 18 : 17 19 : 5
78 : 25 88 : 20 wrong 23 : 25 34 : 25
105 : 25 17 : 17 83 : 25 35 : 18 36 : 1, 2
109 : 16 84 : 3 92 : 9 43 : 1, 9 44 : 15
working 102 : 4 59 : 14 63 : 13
10 : 2 21 : 11 wrote 64 : 3 , 12 65 : 9
23 : 2 26 : 5 , 53 : 16 72 : 5 90 : 16
17 , 23 27 : 2 , 4 wuold 97 : 9 98 : 21
32 : 25 33 : 1 74 : 10 100 : 17
34 : 6 35 : 5 102 : 14 , 16
36 : 16 37 : 4 103 : 23 113 : 2
41 : 24 42 : 25 Y you-all
43 : 5 , 8 51 : 14 26 : 15 28 : 13
52 : 23 58 : 8 yeah 30 : 24 41 : 24
68 : 10 , 18 6 : 23 9 : 22 111 : 2
6 9 : 2 1 77 : 24 10 : 22 11 : 11
90 : 9 100 : 9 12 : 22 13 : 20
103 : 17 14 : 16 16 : 19 Z
104 : 10 , 15 18 : 16 21 : 6
Zacky
24 : 9 25 : 2 ,
106 : 2 , 4 110 : 24 13 , 20 30 : 4 7 : 13
works 31 : 13 33 : 20 Zodky
41 : 18 56 : 17
36 : 8 37 : 8 , 9 : 25 10 : 25
87 : 12 20 , 24 44 : 6 24 : 7 33 : 24
world 47 : 9 48 : 4 34 : 9 40 : 4
63 : 11 50 : 21 52 : 2 61 : 6 62 : 6
55 : 15 56 : 18 65 : 2 69 : 4 ,
worse 57 : 18 59 : 22 , 12 , 25 70 : 1 ,
50 : 4 65 : 12 24 62 : 25 4 , 8 72 : 11
worth 68 : 25 70 : 12 76 : 22 77 : 7 ,
106 : 16 79 : 11 81 : 11 20 , 21 78 : 1
wow 82 : 2 , 4 84 : 18 81 : 23 82 : 14
9 : 4 93 : 8 , 18 95 : 1 83 : 1, 11
wrap 97 : 2 , 7 99 : 2 , 92 : 18 93 : 2 ,
69 : 10 78 : 21 20 103 : 11 10 96 : 14
82 : 4 , 5 , 21 105 : 25 99 : 18 101 : 19
112 : 10 , 11 , 12
U. S . Legal Support I www.uslegalsupport . com 37