Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2021 11 08 City Commission Regular Meeting Agenda
CITY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AGENDA MONDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2021 - 6:30 PM CITY HALL - COMMISSION CHAMBERS 1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434, WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 1 CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Invocation Pledge of Allegiance Agenda Changes AWARDS AND PRESENTATIONS 100. Proclamation Expressing Appreciation for Zachariah Cartledge 101. Update on Orange Avenue INFORMATIONAL AGENDA 200. Current Development Projects Summary 20211108 Agenda Item #200 Projects Summary.pdf PUBLIC INPUT Anyone who wishes to speak during Public Input on any Agenda Item or subject matter will need to fill out a “Public Input” form. Individuals will limit their comments to three (3) minutes, and representatives of groups or homeowners' associations shall limit their comments to five (5) minutes, unless otherwise determined by the City Commission. CONSENT AGENDA 300. Final Budget Amendment for Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Resolution 2021-16 Final Budget Amendment FY2021.pdf Attachments (full) v2.pdf 301. Minutes from the October 25, 2021 City Commission Regular Meeting Minutes PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA 400. The Community Development Department, Planning Division requests that the City Commission hold a Public Hearing to consider Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) based amendments to the Comprehensive Plan (Ordinance 2021- 08), amending the Comprehensive Plan related to the Recreation and Open Space Element. CC_20211108 ROS Element_FINAL.pdf Ordinance 2021-08 EAR Based Amendments Recreation and Open Space Element.pdf Legal Ad_ROS Element Ordinance 2021-08.pdf 2 401. The Community Development Department, Planning Division requests that the City Commission hold a Public Hearing to consider Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) based amendments to the Comprehensive Plan (Ordinance 2021- 07), amending the Comprehensive Plan related to the Capital Improvements Element. CC_20211108_CI Element_FINAL.pdf Ordinance 2021-07 EAR Based Amendments Capital Improvements Element.pdf Legal Ad_CI Element Ordinance 2021-07.pdf REGULAR AGENDA 500. The 2021 Interlocal Agreement (ILA) for Public School Facility Planning and School Concurrency Presentation ILA Presentation_for WS 11-8-2021 2021 ILA Final 06172021-no watermark-no redline SCPSAttendance Zones 2021-2022 Enrollment Capacity_SURVEY 2_Rev 2021 Development Map_ALL 2008 ILA 501. Appointment Opportunities for City Boards and Committees 502. New Business REPORTS 600. City Manager Shawn Boyle 601. City Attorney Anthony A. Garganese 602. City Clerk Christian Gowan 603. Seat Five Commission Rob Elliott 604. Mayor Kevin McCann 605. Seat One Commissioner Matt Benton 606. Seat Two Commissioner Kevin Cannon 607. Seat Three Commissioner/Deputy Mayor Ted Johnson 608. Seat Four Commissioner TiAnna Hale PUBLIC INPUT Anyone who wishes to speak during Public Input on any Agenda Item or subject matter will need to fill out a “Public Input” form. Individuals will limit their comments to three (3) minutes, and representatives of groups or homeowners' associations shall limit their comments to five (5) minutes, unless otherwise determined by the City Commission. ADJOURNMENT 3 PUBLIC NOTICE This is a Public Meeting, and the public is invited to attend and this Agenda is subject to change. Please be advised that one (1) or more Members of any of the City's Advisory Boards and Committees may be in attendance at this Meeting, and may participate in discussions. Persons with disabilities needing assistance to participate in any of these proceedings should contact the City of Winter Springs at (407) 327-1800 "at least 48 hours prior to meeting, a written request by a physically handicapped person to attend the meeting, directed to the chairperson or director of such board, commission, agency, or authority" - per Section 286.26 Florida Statutes. "If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the board, agency, or commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he or she will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purpose, he or she may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based" - per Section 286.0105 Florida Statutes. 4 INFORMATIONAL AGENDA ITEM 200 CITY COMMISSION AGENDA | NOVEMBER 8, 2021 REGULAR MEETING TITLE Current Development Projects Summary SUMMARY Staff is advising the City Commission of the status of current development projects within the City. RECOMMENDATION No action required. 5 Page 1 of 2 CURRENT DEVLEOPMENT PROJECTS SUMMARY PROJECT NAME LOCATION LAST ACTION ITEM CURRENT STATUS AITC Office Building 863 N US 17-92 N/A DA, Final Engineering & Aesthetic Plans are under Staff review. Chase Bank Town Center Community Workshop was held on 02/20/20 CUP and DA approved by the CC on 11/16/20. DA, Final Engineering, Waiver, & Aesthetic Plans approved by the CC 10/25/2021. Building Permits under review. Dream Finders Townhomes (Seminole Crossing): 114 Single-Family (Attached) Units Town Center - East side of Michael Blake Blvd. Preliminary Engineering approved by CC on 1/8/18. DA, Final Engineering, Waivers, & Aesthetic Review approved by the CC on 12/09/2019. Final Plat approved by the CC on 09/28/20. Site work complete. Site acceptance complete on 07/12/2021. Single-Family Homes are under construction. Hickory Grove Townhomes 133 Single-Family (Attached) Units Northeast of Bear Springs Drive and Blumberg Blvd A Non-Binding review was held at the CC on 02/25/2021. Community Workshop was held on 08/26/2021. DA, Final Engineering, Waivers, & Aesthetic Plans are under Staff review. Iriye Suites Live Work Community Town Center SE & DA approved by CC on 01/28/19. Pending* - Final Engineering and Aesthetic Plans Northern Oaks: 35 Single-Family Homes by Dream Finders Homes North side of SR 434, East of SR 417 Final Engineering & Waivers approved 03/13/17. Aesthetic Review approved 04/9/18. Waiver approved by CC on 11/18/19. Site acceptance complete on 01/13/20. Currently all 35 Single-Family Homes are permitted and/or completed. The Studios at Tuscawilla Vistawilla Drive Community Workshop was held on 07/19/19. DA approved by the CC on 01/13/20. Pending* - Final Engineering, Aesthetic, & Waivers 6 Page 2 of 2 Tuskawilla Crossings: 379 Single-Family Homes Town Center DA, Final Engineering, Waivers, & Aesthetics approved by CC on 04/24/17. Plat approved 08/13/18. Site acceptance complete. Currently 371 Single-Family Homes are permitted and/or completed with 8 remaining. Winter Springs Medical Office E SR 434 Community Workshop was held on 08/13/19. DA, Final Engineering & Aesthetic Plans approved by the CC on 11/16/20. Aesthetic Plans for Chipotle approved by the CC on 08/09/2021. Site work started. Medical Office Building under construction. Winter Springs Marketplace Five (5) Building Commercial Shopping Center SW Corner of SR 434 and Tuskawilla Road Community Workshop was held on 05/28/20. DA, Final Engineering, Waivers, & Aesthetic Review approved by the CC on 02/22/2021. Site work started. Crunch Fitness, Dollar Tree, and Heartland Dental Buildings under construction. Winter Springs Retirement Residence (The Savoy): 144 independent suites Town Center DA, Final Engineering, Waivers, & Aesthetic Review approved by CC on 01/22/18. Site work complete. Suites under construction. Estimated construction completion date is December 2021. Winter Springs Town Center Retail Building (Ocean Bleu) Town Center Final Engineering & Aesthetic Plans approved by CC on 06/10/19. Pending* - Preconstruction Meeting For more information please click the link below: City of Winter Springs Community Development Projects List/Locations Notes: ADU = Accessory Dwelling Unit CC = City Commission CUP = Conditional Use Permit DA = Development Agreement PZB = Planning and Zoning Board SE = Special Exception *No Current Activity 7 CONSENT AGENDA ITEM 300 CITY COMMISSION AGENDA | NOVEMBER 8, 2021 REGULAR MEETING TITLE Final Budget Amendment for Fiscal Year 2020-2021 SUMMARY The City is requesting that the Commission consider approval of Resolution 2021-16 amending the Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Budget. This agenda item is needed to amend the Fiscal Year 2020-2021 budget for those funds which vary from the originally adopted budget. The vast majority of the amendments are necessary for one of the following reasons: accrual of revenues and expenses in the appropriate fiscal period variations between budgeted (estimated) and actual expenditures and revenues 2020-2021 agenda items with fiscal impact The City Charter provides that the Commission may amend the budget by resolution. Please note that only those funds requiring budget adjustment are included herein. Part of the normal course of operations at fiscal year-end is the accrual of revenues and expenses. The accruals are necessary for aligning revenues and expenses with the fiscal period to which they relate. It is also typical for some variances between actual and budgeted expenses and revenues to require budget adjustments. Furthermore, over the course of the fiscal year, various agenda items are approved by the Commission. In some cases, those approved agenda items lack specific language to amend the expenditure budget or the appropriation to or from fund balance. This resolution formalizes the fiscal impact of those actions. This budget amendment allows for transfer to #140 Arbor Fund for urban beautification and City forestry projects ($500k), transfer to the #303 Perk Up Parks Capital Project Fund for future park initiatives/projects ($500k), transfer to #130 Solid Waste/Recycling Fund to replenish storm reserve ($800k), transfer to #305 Excellence in Customer Service Capital Project Fund for customer service initiatives ($400k), transfer to #410 Water & Sewer Fund for waste water emergency repairs ($500k), transfer to #411 Stormwater Fund 8 for engineering services - stormwater study and equipment needed for clean up and upgrade - pending study ($350k). Shown in Attachment 1 are the final budgeted ending fund balances for all funds requiring amendment for the 2020-2021 fiscal year. Please note: these are budgeted figures only, not to be confused with audited financial statements which will be available by the end of March 2022. State statute requires that the final budget amendment be formalized by November 29, 2021 [Section 166.241 F.S.]. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Commission consider approval of Resolution 2021- 16. 9 City of Winter Springs, Florida Resolution 2021-16 Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION 2021-16 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2020-2021 BUDGET; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, REPEAL OF PRIOR INCONSISTENT RESOLUTIONS, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Section 7.05 of the City Charter provides that the annual City budget may be amended by Resolution duly adopted by the Commission; and WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs deems that this Resolution is in the best interests of the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Winter Springs. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The foregoing recitals are deemed true and correct and are hereby fully incorporated by this reference. Section 2. Final Budget Amendment. That the Fiscal Year 2020-2021 City Budget is amended as provided in Attachments 1 and 2 attached hereto. Section 3. Repeal of Prior Inconsistent Resolutions. All prior resolutions or parts of resolutions in conflict herewith are hereby repealed to the extent of the conflict. Section 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, word, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion hereto. Section 5. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption by the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida. 10 City of Winter Springs, Florida Resolution 2021-16 Page 2 of 2 RESOLVED by the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, in a regular meeting assembled on the 8th day of November, 2021. Kevin McCann, Mayor ATTEST: Christian Gowan, City Clerk Approved as to legal form and sufficiency for the City of Winter Springs only: Anthony A. Garganese, City Attorney 11 Attachment 1 - Budget Amendment Detail Resolution 2021-016 General Fund Funds not included in this summary do not require budget amendment HELPFUL TOOLS: Comprehensive Financial Annual Report (CFAR) for the year ended September 30, 2020 as approved by City Commission on 04/26/2021 Regular 501; Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Original Budget as approved by City Commission on 9/28/2020 Public Hearing 401. Difference in Beg. Fund Bal Projected to Actual Actual Beg. Fund Balance 9/30/20 CFAR General Fund #001: As approved by City Commission on 9/28/20 Public Hearing Item 401: 10/1/20 Budgeted Beginning Fund Balance $8,824,620 $110,774 $8,935,394 FY 2021 Budgeted Appropriation TO (FROM) Fund Balance $0 9/30/21 Budgeted Ending Fund Balance $8,824,620 Amendments to be approved tonight to Original FY 2020-2021 Budget (as approved on 9/28/20): Difference in Beginning Fund Balance TO (FROM) projected to actual as shown in 9/30/20 CFAR $110,774 Fiscal Year 2021 Purchase Order/Budget Rollovers: Recognize revenue budget - Misc. Rev.$1,437 mid-yr PO rollover - PO#20-1280 - Doors for Senior Center bathrooms ($1,437) mid-yr $0 Revenue Neutral: Grants/Donations: Recognize revenue budget - Misc. Rev. $9,200 mid-yr Recognize expenditure budget - Police Chief - vehicle striping ($9,200) mid-yr Recognize revenue budget - Insurance settlement $10,707 mid-yr Recognize expenditure - General Government - Replacement vehicle purchase ($10,707)mid-yr Recognize revenue budget - CARES Act - PW vehicle purchase $144,235 mid-yr Consent 301; 1/21/21 - CARES Act - PW vehicle purchase (4110) ($144,235) mid-yr Consent 301; 1/21/21 - CARES Act - Scale Computing Hardware & Service (1600) $145,059 mid-yr Recognize revenue budget - CARES Act - Scale Computing Hardware & Service ($145,059) mid-yr $0 Community Events: Recognize revenue budget - drive-in movie nights $10,411 mid-yr Recognize expenditure budget - drive-in movie nights ($10,411) mid-yr Recognize revenue budget - facility upgrade from Florida Kraze Krush soccer team $3,000 mid-yr Recognize expenditure budget - facility upgrade ($3,000) mid-yr Recognize revenue budget (various events) $52,895 final Recognize expenditure budget (Winter Wonderland) ($27,110) final Recognize expenditure budget (4th of July) ($25,785) final $0 Inter-departmental transfers: Inter-departmental transfer FROM Dep't 15 Comm. Dev - payroll (1510)$20,000 final Inter-departmental transfer FROM Dep't 15 Comm. Dev - R&M grounds (1520)$50,000 final Inter-departmental transfer FROM Dep't 15 Comm. Dev - streetlights (1530) $35,000 final Inter-departmental transfer TO Dep't 16 Info Svcs. - IS general payroll (1600)($35,000) final Inter-departmental transfer TO Dep't 16 Info Svcs. - insurance (1925)($67,500) final Inter-departmental transfer FROM Dep't 19 Gen Gov't - contingency (1900)$2,500 final Inter-departmental transfer TO Dep't 19 Gen Gov't - consulting (1900) ($60,000) final Inter-departmental transfer FROM Dep't 72 Parks - R&M (7230)$25,000 final Inter-departmental transfer FROM Dep't 72 Parks - senior center payroll (7250)$30,000 final $0 FY 21 Final Budget Amendment Attachment 1 12 Attachment 1 - Budget Amendment Detail Resolution 2021-016 General Fund Funds not included in this summary do not require budget amendment HELPFUL TOOLS: Comprehensive Financial Annual Report (CFAR) for the year ended September 30, 2020 as approved by City Commission on 04/26/2021 Regular 501; Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Original Budget as approved by City Commission on 9/28/2020 Public Hearing 401. Difference in Beg. Fund Bal Projected to Actual Actual Beg. Fund Balance 9/30/20 CFAR Other: Recognize General Fund revenue budget (electricity utility tax ) $502,600 final Recognize General Fund revenue budget (electricity franchise fee) $277,000 final Recognize revenue budget (communication service tax) $174,000 final Recognize General Fund revenue budget (half cent sales tax) $872,700 final Recognize General Fund revenue budget (revenue sharing) $497,000 final Recognize General Fund revenue budget (federal grant) $208,300 final Recognize General Fund revenue budget (local business tax) $48,800 final Recognize General Fund revenue budget (water utility tax) $49,170 final Recognize General Fund Revenue Budget - Misc. (CRA Refund) $135,930 final Decrease contingency budget $260,500 final Decrease payroll budget (city clerk department)$24,000 final Establish transfer budget to Water & Sewer Fund # 410 for water quality emergency repairs and/or WTP 1 fixes etc. (3600) ($500,000) final Establish transfer budget to Stormwater Fund #411 for needed equip for cleaning & upgrade pending study (3800) ($100,000) final Establish transfer budget to Stormwater Fund #411 for engineering svcs. - stormwater study (3810) ($250,000) final Establish transfer budget to Solid waste Fund for Storm Reserve ($800,000) final Establish transfer budget to Perk Up Parks CP Fund #303 for future park initiatives (7230) ($500,000) final Establish transfer budget to Excellence in Customer Service Fund #305 city facilities renovations (end of life assets) ($400,000) final Establish transfer budget to Arbor Fund # 140 for various urban beatification initiatives (1520) ($500,000) final $0 Revisions to Original Budgeted Appropriation TO (FROM) Fund Balance $0 REVISED 9/30/21 Budgeted Ending Fund Balance $8,935,394 FY 21 Final Budget Amendment Attachment 1 13 Attachment 1 - Budget Amendment Detail Resolution 2021-016 Other Governmental Funds HELPFUL TOOLS: Comprehensive Financial Annual Report (CFAR) for the year ended September 30, 2020 as approved by City Commission on 04/26/2021 Regular 501; Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Original Budget as approved by City Commission on 9/28/2020 Public Hearing 401. Difference in Beg. Fund Bal Projected to Actual Actual Beg. Fund Balance 9/30/20 CFAR Police Education Fund #101 As approved by City Commission on 9/28/20 Public Hearing 401 10/1/20 Budgeted Beginning Fund Balance $19,550 ($4,141)$15,409 FY 2021 Budgeted Appropriation TO (FROM) Fund Balance ($100) 9/30/21 Budgeted Ending Fund Balance $19,450 Amendments to be approved tonight to Original FY 2020-2021 Budget (as approved on 9/28/20): Difference in Beginning Fund Balance TO (FROM) projected to actual as shown in 9/30/20 CFAR ($4,141) Increase SPI and simulation training - training expenditure budget ($7,000) mid-yr Increase traffic fines revenue $500 fin-yr Increase training expenditure budget ($500) fin-yr Revisions to Original Budgeted Appropriation TO (FROM) Fund Balance ($11,141) REVISED 9/30/21 Budgeted Ending Fund Balance $8,309 Special Law Enforcement Fund - Local #102 As approved by City Commission on 9/28/20 Public Hearing 401 10/1/20 Budgeted Beginning Fund Balance $9,605 $3,943 $13,548 FY 2021 Budgeted Appropriation TO (FROM) Fund Balance ($7,550) 9/30/21 Budgeted Ending Fund Balance $2,055 Amendments to be approved tonight to Original FY 2020-2021 Budget (as approved on 9/28/20): Difference in Beginning Fund Balance TO (FROM) projected to actual as shown in 9/30/20 CFAR $3,943 Defer legal fees for local forfeiture $3,000 mid-yr Align confiscated revenue budget with YTD actuals $51,275 fin-yr Increase legal fees for local forfeiture ($6,550) fin-yr Revisions to Original Budgeted Appropriation TO (FROM) Fund Balance $51,668 REVISED 9/30/21 Budgeted Ending Fund Balance $53,723 Special Law Enforcement Fund - Federal #103 As approved by City Commission on 9/28/20 Public Hearing 401 10/1/20 Budgeted Beginning Fund Balance $44,600 $1,111 $45,711 Recognize revenue budget - facility upgrade from Florida Kraze Krush soccer team ($38,743) mid-yr 9/30/21 Budgeted Ending Fund Balance $5,857 Amendments to be approved tonight to Original FY 2020-2021 Budget (as approved on 9/28/20): Difference in Beginning Fund Balance TO (FROM) projected to actual as shown in 9/30/20 CFAR $1,111 Align fines revenue budget with YTD actuals fine revenues $53,570 mid-yr/fin yr Increase small tool expenditure budget ($53,570) mid-yr/fin yr Revisions to Original Budgeted Appropriation TO (FROM) Fund Balance $1,111 REVISED 9/30/21 Budgeted Ending Fund Balance $6,968 FY 21 Final Budget Amendment Attachment 1 14 Attachment 1 - Budget Amendment Detail Resolution 2021-016 Other Governmental Funds HELPFUL TOOLS: Comprehensive Financial Annual Report (CFAR) for the year ended September 30, 2020 as approved by City Commission on 04/26/2021 Regular 501; Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Original Budget as approved by City Commission on 9/28/2020 Public Hearing 401. Difference in Beg. Fund Bal Projected to Actual Actual Beg. Fund Balance 9/30/20 CFAR Transportation Improvement Fund #120 As approved by City Commission on 9/28/20 Public Hearing 401 10/1/20 Budgeted Beginning Fund Balance $1,278,976 $162,040 $1,441,016 FY 2021 Budgeted Appropriation TO (FROM) Fund Balance ($543,610) 9/30/21 Budgeted Ending Fund Balance $735,366 Amendments to be approved tonight to Original FY 2020-2021 Budget (as approved on 9/28/20): Difference in Beginning Fund Balance TO (FROM) projected to actual as shown in 9/30/20 CFAR $162,040 Defer Winding Hollow Turn Lane project to FY2022 $400,000 mid-yr Revisions to Original Budgeted Appropriation TO (FROM) Fund Balance $562,040 REVISED 9/30/21 Budgeted Ending Fund Balance $1,297,406 Infrastructure Surtax Fund #121 (2nd & 3rd Generation) As approved by City Commission on 9/28/20 Public Hearing 401 10/1/20 Budgeted Beginning Fund Balance $9,537,802 $579,291 $10,117,093 FY 2021 Budgeted Appropriation TO (FROM) Fund Balance ($4,004,646) 9/30/21 Budgeted Ending Fund Balance $5,533,156 Amendments to be approved tonight to Original FY 2020-2021 Budget (as approved on 9/28/20): Difference in Beginning Fund Balance TO (FROM) projected to actual as shown in 9/30/20 CFAR $579,291 Defer bridge infrastructure budget (3rd Gen)$475,000 mid-yr Revisions to Original Budgeted Appropriation TO (FROM) Fund Balance $1,054,291 REVISED 9/30/21 Budgeted Ending Fund Balance $6,587,447 Solid Waste/Recycling Fund #130 As approved by City Commission on 9/28/20 Public Hearing 401 10/1/20 Budgeted Beginning Fund Balance $1,923,742 ($25,109)$1,898,633 FY 2021 Budgeted Appropriation TO (FROM) Fund Balance ($283,791) 9/30/21 Budgeted Ending Fund Balance $1,639,951 Amendments to be approved tonight to Original FY 2020-2021 Budget (as approved on 9/28/20): Difference in Beginning Fund Balance TO (FROM) projected to actual as shown in 9/30/20 CFAR ($25,109) Align revenue budget with YTD actuals $48,600 final Increase transfer budget from General Fund to replenish storm reserves $800,000 final Increase expenditure budget - disposal costs ($131,500) final Revisions to Original Budgeted Appropriation TO (FROM) Fund Balance $691,991 REVISED 9/30/21 Budgeted Ending Fund Balance $2,331,942 FY 21 Final Budget Amendment Attachment 1 15 Attachment 1 - Budget Amendment Detail Resolution 2021-016 Other Governmental Funds HELPFUL TOOLS: Comprehensive Financial Annual Report (CFAR) for the year ended September 30, 2020 as approved by City Commission on 04/26/2021 Regular 501; Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Original Budget as approved by City Commission on 9/28/2020 Public Hearing 401. Difference in Beg. Fund Bal Projected to Actual Actual Beg. Fund Balance 9/30/20 CFAR Arbor Fund #140 As approved by City Commission on 9/28/20 Public Hearing 401 10/1/20 Budgeted Beginning Fund Balance $670,914 $569,440 $1,240,354 FY 2021 Budgeted Appropriation TO (FROM) Fund Balance ($474,927) 9/30/21 Budgeted Ending Fund Balance $195,987 Amendments to be approved tonight to Original FY 2020-2021 Budget (as approved on 9/28/20): Difference in Beginning Fund Balance TO (FROM) projected to actual as shown in 9/30/20 CFAR $569,440 Increase transfer budget from General Fund for various Urban Beatification initiatives $500,000 final Revisions to Original Budgeted Appropriation TO (FROM) Fund Balance $1,069,440 REVISED 9/30/21 Budgeted Ending Fund Balance $1,265,427 Transportation Impact Fee Fund #150 As approved by City Commission on 9/28/20 Public Hearing 401 10/1/20 Budgeted Beginning Fund Balance $1,661,453 $122,054 $1,783,507 FY 2021 Budgeted Appropriation TO (FROM) Fund Balance ($838,000) 9/30/21 Budgeted Ending Fund Balance $823,453 Amendments to be approved tonight to Original FY 2020-2021 Budget (as approved on 9/28/20): Difference in Beginning Fund Balance TO (FROM) projected to actual as shown in 9/30/20 CFAR $122,054 Defer MBB/SR424 traffic signal construction $425,000 mid-yr Defer Integra/SR424 traffic signal construction $350,000 mid-yr Align impact fee revenue with YTD actuals $94,000 mid-yr City wide traffic study to determine current and future construction impact ($94,000)mid-yr Revisions to Original Budgeted Appropriation TO (FROM) Fund Balance $897,054 REVISED 9/30/21 Budgeted Ending Fund Balance $1,720,507 FY 21 Final Budget Amendment Attachment 1 16 Attachment 1 - Budget Amendment Detail Resolution 2021-016 Other Governmental Funds HELPFUL TOOLS: Comprehensive Financial Annual Report (CFAR) for the year ended September 30, 2020 as approved by City Commission on 04/26/2021 Regular 501; Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Original Budget as approved by City Commission on 9/28/2020 Public Hearing 401. Difference in Beg. Fund Bal Projected to Actual Actual Beg. Fund Balance 9/30/20 CFAR TLBD Maintenance Fund #160 As approved by City Commission on 9/28/20 Public Hearing 401 10/1/20 Budgeted Beginning Fund Balance $169,575 $63,870 $233,445 FY 2021 Budgeted Appropriation TO (FROM) Fund Balance ($39,403) 9/30/21 Budgeted Ending Fund Balance $130,172 Amendments to be approved tonight to Original FY 2020-2021 Budget (as approved on 9/28/20): Difference in Beginning Fund Balance TO (FROM) projected to actual as shown in 9/30/20 CFAR $63,870 Recognize Misc. Private Contribution / Donations $3,000 mid-yr Increase Christmas decorations expenditure budget ($3,000)mid-yr Revisions to Original Budgeted Appropriation TO (FROM) Fund Balance $63,870 REVISED 9/30/21 Budgeted Ending Fund Balance $194,042 TLBD I Capital/Debt Service Fund #261 As approved by City Commission on 9/28/20 Public Hearing 401 10/1/20 Budgeted Beginning Fund Balance $58,701 $1,368 $60,069 FY 2021 Budgeted Appropriation TO (FROM) Fund Balance ($21,487) 9/30/21 Budgeted Ending Fund Balance $37,214 Amendments to be approved tonight to Original FY 2020-2021 Budget (as approved on 9/28/20): Difference in Beginning Fund Balance TO (FROM) projected to actual as shown in 9/30/20 CFAR $1,368 Defer Pond rejuvenation project to FY 2022 budget $25,000 mid-yr Revisions to Original Budgeted Appropriation TO (FROM) Fund Balance $26,368 REVISED 9/30/21 Budgeted Ending Fund Balance $63,582 1999 Construction Capital Project Fund #301 As approved by City Commission on 9/28/20 Public Hearing 401 10/1/20 Budgeted Beginning Fund Balance $873,171 $11,967 $885,138 FY 2021 Budgeted Appropriation TO (FROM) Fund Balance ($143,000) 9/30/21 Budgeted Ending Fund Balance $730,171 Amendments to be approved tonight to Original FY 2020-2021 Budget (as approved on 9/28/20): Difference in Beginning Fund Balance TO (FROM) projected to actual as shown in 9/30/20 CFAR $11,967 Defer Master Plan to FY 2022 budget $150,000 final Revisions to Original Budgeted Appropriation TO (FROM) Fund Balance $161,967 REVISED 9/30/21 Budgeted Ending Fund Balance $892,138 FY 21 Final Budget Amendment Attachment 1 17 Attachment 1 - Budget Amendment Detail Resolution 2021-016 Other Governmental Funds HELPFUL TOOLS: Comprehensive Financial Annual Report (CFAR) for the year ended September 30, 2020 as approved by City Commission on 04/26/2021 Regular 501; Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Original Budget as approved by City Commission on 9/28/2020 Public Hearing 401. Difference in Beg. Fund Bal Projected to Actual Actual Beg. Fund Balance 9/30/20 CFAR Perk Up Parks Capital Project Fund #303 As approved by City Commission on 9/28/20 Public Hearing 401 10/1/20 Budgeted Beginning Fund Balance $3,506,352 $610,863 $4,117,215 FY 2021 Budgeted Appropriation TO (FROM) Fund Balance ($775,570) 9/30/21 Budgeted Ending Fund Balance $2,730,782 Amendments to be approved tonight to Original FY 2020-2021 Budget (as approved on 9/28/20): Difference in Beginning Fund Balance TO (FROM) projected to actual as shown in 9/30/20 CFAR $610,863 Defer Torcaso Site Improvements Phase 2 to FY 2022 budget $200,000 final Increase transfer budget from General Fund for Public Facilities for Perk up Park program $500,000 final Revisions to Original Budgeted Appropriation TO (FROM) Fund Balance $1,310,863 REVISED 9/30/21 Budgeted Ending Fund Balance $4,041,645 Excellence in Customer Service Initiative CP Fund #305 As approved by City Commission on 9/28/20 Public Hearing 401 10/1/20 Budgeted Beginning Fund Balance $514,752 $346,111 $860,863 FY 2021 Budgeted Appropriation TO (FROM) Fund Balance ($177,000) 9/30/21 Budgeted Ending Fund Balance $337,752 Amendments to be approved tonight to Original FY 2020-2021 Budget (as approved on 9/28/20): Difference in Beginning Fund Balance TO (FROM) projected to actual as shown in 9/30/20 CFAR $346,111 Eliminate New Backup system project $150,000 mid-yr Increase transfer from General Fund for customer service initiatives $400,000 final Increase capital budget (renovation of Police Dept. restrooms )($35,000)final Revisions to Original Budgeted Appropriation TO (FROM) Fund Balance $861,111 REVISED 9/30/21 Budgeted Ending Fund Balance $1,198,863 FY 21 Final Budget Amendment Attachment 1 18 Attachment 1 - Budget Amendment Detail Resolution 2021-016 Enterprise Funds Net Capital, Restricted, NPL Difference in Beg. Fund Bal. - Projected to Actual Actual Ending Fund Equity 9/30/20 CFAR Water & Sewer Operating Fund #410 As approved by City Commission on 9/28/20 Public Hearing Item 401: 10/1/20 Budgeted Beginning Fund Equity $6,601,642 $17,042,697 $6,478,443 $30,122,782 As approved by City Commission on 9/28/20 Public Hearing Item 401: ($1,550,057) 9/30/21 Budgeted Ending Fund Equity $5,051,585 W&S Svc Avail Fund $6,628,335 CFAR combines 410, 412 $36,751,117 Amendments to be approved tonight to Original FY 2020-2021 Budget (as approved on 9/28/20): $6,478,443 Increase transfer from General Fund for Waste Water emergency repairs (3600) (grant match)$500,000 final Revisions to Original Budgeted Fund Equity $6,978,443 $12,030,028 Stormwater Utility Fund #411 Amendments to be approved tonight to Original FY 2020-2021 Budget (as approved on 9/28/20): 10/1/20 Budgeted Beginning Fund Equity $896,554 $6,860,763 $1,842,791 $9,600,108 Difference in Beginning Fund Equity FROM projected to actual as shown in 9/30/20 CFAR ($269,689) 9/30/21 Budgeted Ending Fund Equity $626,865 REVISED 9/30/21 Budgeted Ending Fund Equity Amendments to be approved tonight to Original FY 2020-2021 Budget (as approved on 9/28/20): $1,842,791 Increase transfer budget from General Fund for Stormwater for Engineering Study (3810)$100,000 final Increase transfer budget from General Fund for Stormwater for Equip -for cleaning & upgrade pending study (3800)$250,000 final Revisions to Original Budgeted Appropriation TO (FROM) Fund Equity $2,192,791 $2,819,656 Water and Sewer Service Availability Fund #412: As approved by City Commission on 9/28/20 Public Hearing Item 401:CFAR combines 410, 412 10/1/20 Budgeted Beginning Fund Equity $6,329,087 $299,248 $6,628,335 FY 2020 Budgeted Appropriation TO (FROM) Fund Equity ($1,470,000) 9/30/21 Budgeted Ending Fund Equity $4,859,087 Amendments to be approved tonight to Original FY 2020-2021 Budget (as approved on 9/28/20): $299,248 Align Service Availability revenue budget with YTD actuals (residential) $0 Revisions to Original Budgeted Fund Equity $0 $4,859,087 Development Services Fund #420 As approved by City Commission on 9/28/20 Public Hearing Item 401: 10/1/20 Budgeted Beginning Fund Equity $4,662,837 $1,708,181 $6,371,018 FY 2020 Budgeted Appropriation TO (FROM) Fund Equity ($482,746) 9/30/21 Budgeted Ending Fund Equity $4,180,091 Amendments to be approved tonight to Original FY 2020-2021 Budget (as approved on 9/28/20): $1,708,181 Consent 302; 12/04/20 Vehicle purchase - Chevrolet Bolt EV ($60,512)mid-yr. Align building permit revenue with YTD actuals $100,000 Increase other svcs. - contract / administrative temp services expense budget ($55,000) Increase other svcs. - maint. agreements / licenses expense budget ($45,000) Revisions to Original Budgeted Fund Equity $1,647,669 $5,827,760 Difference in Beginning Fund Balance TO (FROM) projected to actual as shown in 9/30/20 CFAR HELPFUL TOOLS: Comprehensive Financial Annual Report (CFAR) for the year ended September 30, 2020 as approved by City Commission on 04/26/2021 Regular 501; Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Original Budget as approved by City Commission on 9/28/2020 Public Hearing 401. Difference in Beginning Fund Balance TO (FROM) projected to actual as shown in 9/30/20 CFAR REVISED 9/30/21 Budgeted Ending Fund Equity (excl of net capital, restricted, NPL) Difference in Beginning Fund Balance TO (FROM) projected to actual as shown in 9/30/20 CFAR REVISED 9/30/21 Budgeted Ending Fund Equity (excl of net capital, restricted, NPL) REVISED 9/30/21 Budgeted Ending Fund Equity (excl of net capital, restricted, NPL) Difference in Beginning Fund Balance TO (FROM) projected to actual as shown in 9/30/20 CFAR REVISED 9/30/21 Budgeted Ending Fund Equity (excl of net capital, restricted, NPL) FY 21 Final Budget Amendment Attachment 1 19 Attachment 2 - General Fund Budget Amendment Summary Resolution 2021-016 FY 21 Commission Other FY 21 Original Approved Revenue Requests Inter Intra Amended Annual Amendments to PO/Budget Neutral to Amend Departmental Departmental Annual Division #Budget Appropriation Rollovers Changes Appropriation Transfers Transfers Budget General Fund Revenues & Transfers:$16,883,194 $16,883,194 Recognize revenue budget - movie nights donations 10,411$ 10,411$ Recognize revenue budget - facility upgrade from FKK 3,000$ 3,000$ Recognize revenue budget - CARES Act - PW vehicle purchase $144,235 144,235$ Recognize revenue budget - CARES Act - Scale Computing Hardware & Service $145,059 145,059$ Recognize revenue budget - Misc. Rev.$1,437 $9,200 10,637$ Recognize revenue budget - Insurance settlement $10,707 10,707$ Recognize revenue budget - CARES, CRA Refund $344,230 344,230$ Recognize revenue budget - multiple - half cent sales tax, comm. service tax, interest earnings etc.$872,700 872,700$ Recognize revenue budget - multiple - rev. sharing, local business tax, etc.$545,800 545,800$ Recognize revenue budget - electricity tax and water utility tax $326,170 326,170$ Recognize revenue budget - communication service tax and investment interest $174,000 174,000$ Recognize revenue budget - electricity franchise fees $502,600 502,600$ Recognize revenue budget - community events 52,895$ 52,895$ -$ General Fund Revenues & Transfers 16,883,194$ -$ 1,437$ 375,507$ -$ 2,765,500$ -$ 20,025,638$ General Fund Expenditures: City Commission 1100 117,112$ 117,112$ City Manager 1200 318,751$ 318,751$ City Clerk 1210 181,222$ (24,000)$ 157,222$ Finance - General 1300 617,291$ 617,291$ Finance - Utility Billing 1360 603,958$ 603,958$ Comm. Development - Administration 1500 138,475$ 138,475$ Comm. Development - Planning 1510 88,957$ (20,000)$ 68,957$ Comm. Development - Urban Beautification 1520 700,783$ 450,000$ 1,150,783$ Comm. Development - Street lighting 1530 521,627$ (35,000)$ 486,627$ IS & General Services - Human Resources 1315 308,638$ (3,000)$ 305,638$ IS & General Services - General 1600 774,020$ 145,059$ 35,000$ 954,079$ IS & General Services - City Hall 1910 26,526$ 26,526$ IS & General Services - Risk Management 1925 605,300$ 67,500$ 52,895$ 725,695$ IS & General Services - Facilities Maintenance 1935 277,413$ 3,000$ 280,413$ IS & General Services - Marketing & Events 7415 169,502$ 63,306$ (52,895)$ 179,913$ General Government - Legal Services 1400 265,420$ 265,420$ General Government - General 1900 1,138,941$ 10,707$ 1,047,000$ 2,196,648$ Police - Chief 2100 6,049,437$ 9,200$ (250)$ 6,058,387$ Police - Criminal Investigations 2110 31,015$ 31,015$ Police - Community Services 2120 13,665$ 13,665$ Police - Operations 2130 111,630$ 1,650$ 113,280$ Police - Support Services 2140 603,869$ (1,400)$ 602,469$ Police - Code Enforcement 2150 9,180$ 9,180$ Fire - Operations 2200 278,694$ 278,694$ Public Works - Fleet 1940 188,363$ 188,363$ Public Works - Administration 4100 95,085$ 95,085$ Public Works - Roads & ROW 4110 589,556$ 144,235$ 800,000$ 1,533,791$ P&R - Administration 7200 226,031$ 226,031$ P&R - Athletics 7210 2,906$ 2,906$ P&R - Athletics Partnerships 7220 5,800$ 3,000$ 6,386$ 15,186$ P&R - Parks & Grounds 7230 1,386,548$ 475,000$ (29,903)$ 1,831,645$ P&R - Programs 7240 115,301$ 115,301$ P&R - Seniors 7250 322,178$ 1,437$ (30,000)$ 23,517$ 317,132$ General Fund Expenditures 16,883,194 0 1,437 375,507$ -$ 2,765,500$ -$ 20,025,638 Budgeted Approp. TO (FROM) Fund Balance -$ -$ -$ 0$ -$ -$ -$ 0$ HELPFUL TOOLS: Comprehensive Financial Annual Report (CFAR) for the year ended September 30, 2020 as approved by City Commission on 04/26/2021 Regular 501; Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Original Budget as approved by City Commission on 9/28/2020 Public Hearing 401. FY 21 Final Budget Amendment Attachment 2 20 CITY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES MONDAY, OCTOBER 25, 2021 AT 6:30 PM CITY HALL - COMMISSION CHAMBERS 1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434, WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 21 CITY COMMISSION MINUTES | REGULAR MEETING | MONDAY, OCTOBER 25, 2021 | PAGE 2 OF 9 CALL TO ORDER Mayor Kevin McCann called the Regular Meeting of Monday, October 25, 2021 of the City Commission to order at 6:30 p.m. in the Commission Chambers of the Municipal Building (City Hall, 1126 East State Road 434, Winter Springs, Florida 32708). Roll Call: Mayor Kevin McCann, present Deputy Mayor Ted Johnson, present Commissioner Matt Benton, present Commissioner Kevin Cannon, absent Commissioner TiAnna Hale, present via telephone Commissioner Rob Elliott, present City Manager Shawn Boyle, present Assistant City Attorney Kristin Eick, present City Clerk Christian Gowan, present AWARDS AND PRESENTATIONS 100) Dispatch Consolidation Update Chief Chris Deisler spoke briefly about the recent consolidation of dispatch and characterized the transition as a success. Brief discussion followed on level of service and the potential of setting up tours of the county facility. INFORMATIONAL AGENDA 200) Current Development Projects Summary PUBLIC INPUT Ms. Marie Cashion, 1529 Woodsglen Drive, Winter Springs spoke about plnatings blocking the view for the turn in and out of Georgetown and noted that irrigation in the median seemed to be going into the street. Brief comments followed on the ownership of the median and discussions on planned improvements. Ms. Bridgit Lake - President of OWS Chamber of Commerce, 376 N Central Ave, Oviedo and Ms. Jordan Hook, Director of Sponsorships and Events noted the Winter Springs Festival of the Arts was a great success, commented on efforts to engage 22 CITY COMMISSION MINUTES | REGULAR MEETING | MONDAY, OCTOBER 25, 2021 | PAGE 3 OF 9 with home-based businesses, thanked the City staff that were involved, and presented the Commission with the Festival poster. Discussion followed on the success of the event and Ms. Lake’s upcoming departure from the Oviedo-Winter Springs Chamber of Commerce. CONSENT AGENDA 300) Electric Motor and Pump Repair Services Contract rider, Contract Award No Discussion 301) Police Vehicle Purchase No Discussion 302) Accept donations received to help residents with past due utility accounts. No Discussion 303) Minutes from the August 30, 2021 City Commission Special Meeting No Discussion 304) Minutes from the September 13, 2021 City Commission Regular Meeting No Discussion 305) Minutes from the September 27, 2021 City Commission Regular Meeting No Discussion Manager Boyle confirmed that all items on the consent agenda complied with competitive bid requirements. "MOTION TO APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA." MOTION BY DEPUTY MAYOR JOHNSON. SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER CANNON. DISCUSSION. VOTE: BENTON (AYE); CANNON (AYE); JOHNSON (AYE); HALE (AYE); ELLIOTT (AYE) MOTION CARRIED 5-0. 23 CITY COMMISSION MINUTES | REGULAR MEETING | MONDAY, OCTOBER 25, 2021 | PAGE 4 OF 9 PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA 400) Chase Bank - Aesthetic Plan Review, one Waiver, Final Engineering Review, and Development Agreement. Mr. Christopher Schmidt, Director, Community Development Department introduced the item, reviewed history and surrounding properties, and noted staff’s recommendation of approval. Brief discussion followed on projected potable water usage and concurrency. Mayor McCann opened the Public Hearing for Item 400 Mr. William Morrisey, 965 Sequoia Drive, Winter Springs asked about the proposed waiver. Mr. Schmidt noted the waiver was to allow for consistency in the streetscape and landscape. Mayor McCann closed the Public Hearing for Item 400 "MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 400." MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CANNON. SECONDED BY DEPUTY MAYOR JOHNSON. DISCUSSION. VOTE: BENTON (AYE); CANNON (AYE); JOHNSON (AYE); HALE (AYE); ELLIOTT (AYE) MOTION CARRIED 5-0. REGULAR AGENDA 500) Discussion on City Commission Rules and Procedures & Meetings Mayor McCann introduced the item, noted previous discussions to add meetings, and efforts to streamline city business Extended discussion followed on potentially stacking certain advisory boards on the same days, following the established time limit procedures for agenda item discussions, measures to keep Commissioners aware of their time, adding Commission meetings to months which currently only have one scheduled meeting. The amount of work being done in the City, and the amount of work that staff does. Further discussion followed on the number of events and the time they require, approval of the calendar in December, the possibility of including draft minutes from 24 CITY COMMISSION MINUTES | REGULAR MEETING | MONDAY, OCTOBER 25, 2021 | PAGE 5 OF 9 advisory boards in agenda packets, and keeping the Commission informed about issues with meeting quorums. "MOTION TO APPROVE ADDDING A MEETING IN MAY, JUNE, AND AUGUST." MOTION BY DEPUTY MAYOR JOHNSON. SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER HALE. DISCUSSION. VOTE: BENTON (AYE); CANNON (AYE); JOHNSON (AYE); HALE (AYE); ELLIOTT (AYE) MOTION CARRIED 5-0. Further discussion on advisory boards, the potential of reviewing current boards. The Clerk agreed to provide information on current boards, meeting frequency, and relevant policies. "MOTION TO APPROVE EXTENDING METING." MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HALE. SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER CANNON. DISCUSSION. MOTION PASSED WITH UNANIMOUS CONSENT. Discussion then turned to the previously agreed upon Workshop to discuss a potential Charter amendment related to the Mayor’s position. The Commission agreed that this meeting should be postponed and suggested revisiting the idea in 2023. "MOTION TO APPROVE RESCINDING PREVIOUS COMMITTMENT TO HOLD A WORKSHOP REGARDING THE MAYOR’S POSITION." MOTION BY DEPUTY MAYOR JOHNSON. SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER ELLIOTT. DISCUSSION. VOTE: BENTON (AYE); CANNON (AYE); JOHNSON (AYE); HALE (AYE); ELLIOTT (AYE) MOTION CARRIED 5-0. Manager Boyle noted that a list of questions had been forwarded to representatives of CPH, that they had agreed to come in at a time in December, and that the City Attorney’s office was working with representatives of CPH to set the date. Discussion followed on additional questions, previous discussions to provide the CDM Smith report to CPH for their review and comment, the possibility of inviting former Public Works Director Lena Rivera to the meeting, and the need to provide previously established guidelines to CPH in advance of their appearance. "MOTION TO APPROVE HAVING STAFF SCHEDULE A SPECIAL MEETING INVITING CPH IN AS WE HAVE PREVIOUSLY DISCUSSED." MOTION BY DEPUTY MAYOR JOHNSON. SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER BENTON. DISCUSSION. 25 CITY COMMISSION MINUTES | REGULAR MEETING | MONDAY, OCTOBER 25, 2021 | PAGE 6 OF 9 VOTE: BENTON (AYE); CANNON (AYE); JOHNSON (AYE); HALE (AYE); ELLIOTT (AYE) MOTION CARRIED 5-0. 501) Discussion on Selection of Hometown Hero Mayor McCann briefly introduced the item. Brief discussion followed and the Commission agreed that both nominees were very deserving of the honor and suggested looking at honoring a male and female veteran in the future. "MOTION TO APPROVE THE SELECTION OF JERRY LEWIS AND MAURICE KAPROW AS 2021 HOMETOWN HEROES AND THAT THE CITY INCLUE WITH THAT HONOR PLAQUES TO BE PLACED ON THE VETERANS MEMORIAL. AND IF ANY PRIOR HOMETOWN HEROES ARE NOT ON THE MEMORIAL THEN ADD THEIR NAMES AS WELL." MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CANNON. SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER HALE. DISCUSSION. VOTE: BENTON (AYE); CANNON (AYE); JOHNSON (AYE); HALE (AYE); ELLIOTT (AYE) MOTION CARRIED 5-0. 502) Appointment Opportunities for City Boards and Committees "MOTION TO APPOINT ZOLTAN AROK TO DISTRICTING COMMISSTION." MOTION BY DEPUTY MAYOR JOHNSON. SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER CANNON. DISCUSSION. VOTE: BENTON (AYE); CANNON (AYE); JOHNSON (AYE); HALE (AYE); ELLIOTT (AYE) MOTION CARRIED 5-0. 503) New Business Commissioner Hale asked if the City could look at renaming the Magnolia Park fountain area and suggested tying it with the Veteran Memorial. Staff agreed to look into the matter and the Commission asked that the Veteran and Veteran Family Advisory Committee be consulted. Commissioner Cannon asked about issues with an open-air market held recently at the Foundry Church and asked staff to evaluate and advise on the food truck ordinance’s potential impacts on this event. 26 CITY COMMISSION MINUTES | REGULAR MEETING | MONDAY, OCTOBER 25, 2021 | PAGE 7 OF 9 Staff noted they had reached out to the Church and would continue to communicate. REPORTS 600) City Manager Shawn Boyle • No report 601) Assistant City Attorney Kristin Eick • No report 602) City Clerk Christian Gowan • Reviewed information about the upcoming Districting Commission, noted requirements and differences from other advisory boards. 603) Seat Four Commissioner TiAnna Hale • Noted her attendance at the Winter Springs Festival of the Arts, thanked all involved, and thought it was a great event 604) Seat Five Commissioner Rob Elliott • Noted his participation at Fish Winter Springs and attendance at the Festival of the Arts. Showed photos of the car giveaway. • Noted participation in the Winter Springs High School Homecoming Parade, thought it was a lot of fun. • Noted meeting with the new head of St. Stephens, Father John • Noted attendance at the Tuscawilla Lighting and Beautification District Advisory Committee Meeting • Noted discussions with staff about installing floating Christmas trees in city parks and ponds. 605) Mayor Kevin McCann • Noted the Board Appreciation Dinner was scheduled for November 19 • Announced that he was chosen as the Chairman for the Mayor/Manager meeting group for next year 606) Seat One Commissioner Matt Benton • Recognized the work of the Public Works team that worked diligently to recently make emergency repairs to the wastewater treatment plant. 27 CITY COMMISSION MINUTES | REGULAR MEETING | MONDAY, OCTOBER 25, 2021 | PAGE 8 OF 9 607) Seat Two Commissioner Kevin Cannon •Echoed accolades for the Public Works team •Thanked the City for flowers sent to him while he was in the hospital •Discussed his participation in the Florida League of Cities Advocacy Committee •Thanked the Chief for keeping everyone informed and spoke about the importance of safe driving. •Noted the many current and incoming medical offices setting up in Winter Springs 608) Seat Three Commissioner/Deputy Mayor Ted Johnson •Commented on the work being done in the city parks including the recent ribbon cutting for the Trotwood splash pad and the Torcaso pavilion currently under construction. •Noted his attendance at the Winter Springs Festival of the Arts and thanked all involved in organizing the car giveaway •Noted attending the Citizen Advisory Committee meeting at the police station and the Tuscawilla Lighting and Beautification District Advisory Committee Meeting. •Commented on a recent visit to the East Wastewater Treatment Plant •Noted upcoming Hometown Harvest event and Veterans Day ceremony. PUBLIC INPUT Mr. Kenneth Spalthoff, 331 Wooded Vine Drive, Winter Springs, FL spoke about notices to get quorums and thought live webcasting of city meetings needed to occur. Mr. Art Gallo, 199 Nandina Terrace, Winter Springs echoed comments about notices to board members and made brief comments about advisory boards. ADJOURNMENT Mayor McCann adjourned the meeting at 9:58 PM. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: ____________________________________ CHRISTIAN GOWAN CITY CLERK 28 CITY COMMISSION MINUTES | REGULAR MEETING | MONDAY, OCTOBER 25, 2021 | PAGE 9 OF 9 APPROVED: ____________________________________ MAYOR KEVIN McCANN NOTE: These Minutes were approved at the_________________, 2021 City Commission Regular Meeting. 29 PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM 400 CITY COMMISSION AGENDA | NOVEMBER 8, 2021 REGULAR MEETING TITLE The Community Development Department, Planning Division requests that the City Commission hold a Public Hearing to consider Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) based amendments to the Comprehensive Plan (Ordinance 2021-08), amending the Comprehensive Plan related to the Recreation and Open Space Element. SUMMARY After June 2, 2011, local governments have had more discretion in determining whether they need to update their local comprehensive plan. As such, local governments no longer need to submit evaluation and appraisal reports to the department for a sufficiency determination. Instead, local governments must, at least every seven years, pursuant to Rule Chapter 73C- 49, Florida Administrative Code, determine whether the need exists to amend the Comprehensive Plan to reflect changes in State requirements since the last time the Comprehensive Plan was updated. The evaluation and appraisal should address changes in state requirements since the last update of the comprehensive plan and update the plan based on changes to local conditions. The attached documents include EAR based Comprehensive Plan amendments, specifically to the Recreation and Open Space Element. Subsequent EAR based amendments to other Comprehensive Plan Elements will follow in the next few months during upcoming public hearings. The revised language will allow the Element to come into full compliance with the Evaluation and Appraisal Report that was due in 2017. On October 14, 2021 the Local Planning Agency unanimously recommended approval of the Element to the City Commission. Fiscal Impact The amendment is not expected to have any fiscal impact. 30 Applicable Law and Public Policy Section 2 (b), Article VIII, of the State Constitution. Florida Statute 163.3194 Legal Status of Comprehensive Plan Florida Statute 163.3201 Relationship of Comprehensive Plan in exercise of Land Development Regulatory Authority Florida Statute 166.041 Procedures for adoption of ordinances and resolutions. Winter Springs Charter Section 4.15 Ordinances in General. Winter Springs Code of Ordinances, Chapter 15. Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan Fiscal Impact The amendment is not expected to have any fiscal impact. Proposed Timeline 1. October 4, 2021 Advertisement runs in Orlando Sentinel (10 days prior to LPA) 2. October 14, 2021 Local Planning Agency/Planning & Zoning Board 3. November 8, 2021 City Commission - 1st Reading/Transmittal 4. November 29, 2021 Transmit to Department of Economic Opportunity 5. December 1, 2021 Department of Economic Opportunity Receipt Confirmation 6. December 20, 2021 Adoption Ad runs in Orlando Sentinel (5 days prior to City Commission) 7. January 10, 2022 City Commission – 2nd Reading/Adoption 8. January 24, 2022 Adopted Plan Amendment Submittal to State 9. January 31, 2022 Department of Economic Opportunity (45 day compliancy review) 10. March 17, 2022 Effective Date (no petitions filed) RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Commission hold a Public Hearing and Approve First Reading/Transmittal Hearing of Ordinance 2021-08, amending the Recreation and Open Space Element of the Comprehensive Plan. 31 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT i TABLE OF CONTENTS A. GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES ................................................................................. 1 B. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................10 C. INVENTORY OF EXISTING RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE FACILITIES ..........................10 1. Public Parks and Open Space .......................................................................................10 a. Regional Parks ............................................................................................................................ 11 b. Community Parks ........................................................................................................................ 15 c. Special Use Facilities ................................................................................................................. 16 d. Neighborhood Parks .................................................................................................................. 17 e. Mini-Parks and Tot-Lots ............................................................................................................. 17 f. Open Space ................................................................................................................................ 17 g. Urban Plazas and Squares ...................................................................................................... 17 h. Nearby County Facilities .......................................................................................................... 24 i. School Facilities ........................................................................................................................... 26 2. Private Facilities ............................................................................................................ 26 D. EXISTING AND FUTURE PARKS AND RECREATION NEEDS ............................................. 27 1. Population Trends and User Needs ............................................................................... 28 2. Outdoor Recreation Planning Guidelines ...................................................................... 29 3. Recreational Facilities ................................................................................................... 42 4. Meeting Future Recreation and Open Space Needs ...................................................... 42 5. Public Participation in Recreation Planning .................................................................. 42 EXHIBIT A 32 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT ii LIST OF TABLES Table VI - 1: Park and Open Space Acreage, Based on Level of Service Standards. .................. 7 Table VI - 2: Inventory of Public Parks and Recreational Facilities and Open Space, 2009. ....19 Table VI - 3: Inventory of Private Recreational Facilities, 2009 ................................................ 27 Table VI - 4: Use Guidelines for User-Oriented Recreation Activities, 2007 ............................. 29 Table VI - 5: Population Guidelines for User-Oriented Recreation Activities, 2008 .................. 31 LIST OF MAPS Map VI – 1: Inventory of Public Parks, Recreation Facilities and Open Space ........................... 8 Map VI – 2: Seminole County Trails Construction Map ............................................................ 14 Map VI – 3: Park Service Areas ............................................................................................... 36 Map VI – 4: Target Areas for New Parks ................................................................................. 38 Map VI – 5: Sites for Purchase Consideration .......................................................................... 40 Map VI – 6: Conceptual Trails Network Map ........................................................................... 44 33 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT VI ‐ 1 CHAPTER VI RECREATION & OPEN SPACE ELEMENT A. GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES GOAL 1: To provide adequate open space, parks, and recreation facilities to enable high quality participation for all residents and visitors. Objective 1.1: Level of Service Standards for Parks. To ensure that the City has an adequate acreage of park lands and open space, the City shall utilize Level of Service (LOS) standards. Policy 1.1.1: Utilize the following LOS standards: Total Overall Public Park and Recreation Land Acreage (including Open Space): Eight (8) acres per 1,000 residents. For purposes of implementing this policy, the City may utilize State and County park lands and trails that are located within the City’s jurisdictional boundaries. This standard includes land with passive and active uses. City Owned Open Space: Four (4) acres per 1,000 residents. Open space is defined as “undeveloped lands suitable for passive recreation or conservation”. Policy 1.1.2: Establish Continue thea Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee made up of residents who will work together to review parks and recreation facilities and programs and make appropriate recommendations to the City Commission. Policy 1.1.3: Maintain an inventory of the location, size, condition and amenities available at each public park, recreation area and open space. This inventory shall be updated every year. Policy 1.1.4: Implement and periodically update recreation guidelines and criteria for park sites and facilities based on industry standards and comparison with those of neighboring and comparable jurisdictions. Policy 1.1.5: Rely upon the State of Florida and Seminole County park facilities and wilderness areas located within a 30-mile driving distance of the City for their value as regional resource-oriented facilities. These areas generally serve a population of over 100,000 and feature outdoor recreation resources and facilities that capitalize on and promote appreciation of the natural environment. Policy 1.1.6: Rely upon private development to provide and maintain neighborhood parks in areas of new development. A neighborhood park is a facility that serves an entire neighborhood and which is located no more than 34 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT VI ‐ 2 one-half (1/2) mile from the residents served. In cases where a greater distance cannot be avoided, a paved parking area shall also be provided. The size of a neighborhood park shall be dependent on the number of units served as described in the land development code, but shall not be less than one-half acre. Infill development of 20 units or less shall be exempt from this provision. Typical facilities provided in a neighborhood park often include a swimming pool, cabana or clubhouse with restrooms, playground area, paved multi-purpose court, picnic area., fitness trail, and/or open free play area. Open space may also be one component of the dedicated neighborhood park area. Policy 1.1.7: Protect and enhance open space areas and natural features within existing City parks, and do not allow active recreational uses to unnecessarily encroach upon them. Policy 1.1.8: Require preservation of ecologically sensitive open spaces in the Greeneway Interchange District and promote connectivity of these natural features for habitat continuity and sustainability. Additionally, require a network of public plazas with interconnected sidewalks to promote an urban pedestrian environment. Policy 1.1.9: Pursue additional sites for active public recreational opportunities for current and future residents through land acquisition and/or public/private partnerships. Policy 1.1.10: Acquire park land and develop appropriate facilities by utilizing a variety of funding sources as available, such as the general fund, grants, developer contributions, impact fees, and user fees, as well as creative funding solutions, such as special taxing districts, foundations, private donations, endowments, partnerships, and bond referendums. Policy 1.1.11: Explore opportunities to provide public recreation access to Lake Jesup. Policy 1.1.12: Perpetually hold in public ownership, for recreation and open space purposes, those lands owned by the City which are identified in this element on Map VI-1 and Table VI-2. Policy 1.1.13: Prior to the disposal of nonrecreational City-owned land or facilities, evaluate the potential use of such land or facilities for recreation, and whether such land or facilities are needed to maintain or enhance the City’s recreation program. Policy 1.1.14: Prior to the vacation of any right-of-way, evaluate the potential of the right-of-way for use as part of a future trail corridor or other alternative transportation linkage. Policy 1.1.15: Periodically update and take action to implement the recommendations of the City of Winter Springs Parks and Recreation Master Plan. 35 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT VI ‐ 3 Objective 1.2: Trails. The City should workPursue the expansion of to expand the existing Cross Seminole Trail system to include a network of City trails, thereby improving access for pedestrians and cyclists to schools, parks, open spaces, and businesses and for the additional public outdoor recreation opportunities trails provide. Policy 1.2.1: Encourage public participation in planning and development of all phases of City’s trail expansion program. Policy 1.2.2: Partner with appropriate agencies to study and implement options for future coordinated provisions of a bike/trail network. Policy 1.2.3: Develop standards and guidelines for trail planning, development and maintenance.Continue to followThe City may follow Seminole County Trail development and maintenance guidelines. Policy 1.2.4: Work with Florida Power & Light (FP&L) utility providers to co-locate trail easements in utility corridors. Policy 1.2.5: Encourage homeowner associations whenever possible, to incorporate existing trails into the public trail system. Policy 1.2.6: Acquire property or easements that can be integrated into the City’s existing recreation and proposed trail network system as illustrated on Map VI-6: Conceptual Trails Network System. Policy 1.2.7: Make providing trails a priority in the new planning horizon for the connectivity they provide to schools, parks, natural lands, and businesses. Objective 1.3: Study of Recreation Preferences. The City shall determine the recreational preferences and needs of City residents. Policy 1.3.1: Periodically survey organized leagues and primary users of active recreation facilities to determine participation rates and demand for services and to determine adjustments to active land use programming. Policy 1.3.2: Identify demographic changes in the community and incorporate adjustments in recreation provision planning accordingly. Policy 1.3.3: Reflect neighborhood input in specific park recreation plans. Policy 1.3.4: Utilize national and regional park planning data trends to proactively adjust programmed park facilities. 36 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT VI ‐ 4 Policy 1.3.5: Develop and implement aConduct the City-wide recreation survey every five years. The recreational needs survey shall inquire about recreational preferences in terms of facilities and recreational/educational programs, frequency of use of parks and recreational facilities, location of most frequently used facilities, willingness to pay user fees, location and age profile of respondents, household size, and travel method to preferred/most used parks and recreational facilities. Policy 1.3.6: Reflect the results of the community’s recreation preferences and needs in prioritizing funding expenditures for maintenance and capital improvements. Objective 1.4: Park Maintenance. All City parks shall be maintained and improved in a manner that is consistent with the needs of the City residents, and which maximizes the potential of the individual recreational facilities. Policy 1.4.1: Renovate and/or upgrade the City’s parks and recreational facilities as needed to provide improved recreational opportunities. Policy 1.4.2: Continue the user fee system for City recreation programs and facilities to offset the cost of maintaining and programming facilities, when appropriate. Except in the context of a City-County cooperative agreement, fee-based recreation programs shall be designed, administered and priced so as to give preference to City residents over non-City residents. Objective 1.5: Accessibility. The City shall provide and maintain appropriate, operational park and recreation access for all segments of the City population. Policy 1.5.1: Continue to provide adequate and appropriate automobile, bicycle and pedestrian access to all public parks and facilities. Policy 1.5.2: Design all public recreation facilities as barrier-free as possible to accommodate accessibility by the elderly, handicapped disabled and very young. Policy 1.5.3: Continue to provide adequate parking space, including handicapped parking, and bicycle racks at recreation sites. Policy 1.5.4: Continue to enhance the public’s awareness of park and recreational programs and events through a variety of print and electronic media formats such as the City’s website, brochures newsletters, etc. 37 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT VI ‐ 5 Policy 1.5.5: Work to increase public awareness of the need for and benefits of healthy and active lifestyles. Policy 1.5.6: Continue to provide a scholarship program for low-income families. Provide assistance to low-income families to obtain scholarship opportunities to participate in recreation programs. Objective 1.6: Private Parks and Recreation Facilities. The City shall encourage the preservation and use of private lands for park and recreation facilities and open space. Policy 1.6.1: Require residential developments outside of the Town Center with over 20 units, to provide and maintain neighborhood recreational facilities. Standards for these facilities shall be described in the land development code. Policy 1.6.2: Revise open space regulations for subdivisions and other new developments in the land development code. Policy 1.6.3: Assess park and recreation impact fees to new residential development as a pro rata share of the costs required to expand or acquire capital facilities or equipment made necessary by the new construction from which the fees are collected or for principal payments on debt instruments for these facilities and services. (Cross Reference: See Capital Improvements Element, Policy 1.4.4) Policy 1.6.4: Encourage new developments falling within the planned trail network to provide public trail linkages either through or adjacent to their development. Objective 1.7: Interagency Cooperation and Joint use of Facilities. The City shall continue coordination efforts with agencies and developers to provide quality development of recreation areas, and to avoid duplication of recreation facilities including provisions for joint use of facilities, to meet the recreation demands of the City’s citizens. Policy 1.7.1: Coordinate park and open space planning with adjacent jurisdictions. Policy 1.7.2: Work with the Department of Environmental Protection and the Department of Transportation and other trail-related advocacy and support agencies for assistance in developing a local trail network with connectivity to the regional trail system. Policy 1.7.3: Continue coordination with the Seminole County School Board, to allow the use of school board facilities by the general public. Parks and schools shall be collocated to the extent possible to optimize the shared use of facilities. (Cross Reference: See Future Land Use Element, Policy 1.11.9) 38 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT VI ‐ 6 Policy 1.7.4: Review updates to the County Parks and Recreation Master Plan, and make the necessary updates to this element to achieve consistency. 39 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT VI ‐ 7 Table VI - 1: Park and Open Space Acreage, Based on Level of Service Standards Year Population Total Overall Parkland (1) (8 acres per 1,000 residents) Open Space (2) (4 acres per 1,000 residents) Existing Acreage Required Surplus/(Deficit) Existing Acreage Required Surplus/(Deficit) 2017 35,050 402 280.40 121.60 169.91 140.20 29.71 2021 37,773 410.88 302.18 108.70 175.43 151.09 24.34 2025 39,551 410.88 316.41 94.47 175.43 158.20 17.23 2030 41,119 410.88 328.95 81.93 175.43 164.48 10.95 2035 42,994 410.88 343.95 66.93 175.43 171.98 3.45 2040 44,572 410.88 356.58 54.30 175.43 178.29 -2.86 Source: American Community Survey 2013-20172015-2019 ; Projections by Shimberg Center for Housing Studies, based on 20002010 and 20102020 U.S. Census data and population projections by the Bureau of Economic and Business Research, University of Florida. Population- U.S. Census, as adjusted for 2000; University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR); City of Winter Springs Evaluation and Appraisal Report 1) Includes the total of all public parks and recreational lands including any State and County facilities within the City limits. Therefore the Cross Seminole Trail is included. and Jetta Point County Park will be included once developed. 2) Includes the total of all city-owned open space. Some of this land is noted on subdivision plats as "park" but are undevelopable wetlands and are included on the Future Land Use Map - 20302040 as "Recreation and Open Space". The remainder of the lands are conservation lands under the City's jurisdiction and are included on the Future Land Use Map – 2030 2040 as "Conservation". Conservation lands owned by the St. John's River Water Management District are not included. The addition of the 40-acre wetland park in the Town Center will eliminate the deficit, once it is conveyed. The addition of the continued expansion of Central Winds Park (7.66 acres) will eliminate the 2040 deficit of 2.86 acres. Total Overall Parkland (1) (8 acres per 1,000 residents) Open Space (2) (4 acres per 1,000 residents) Existing 380.50 380.50 380.50 380.50 380.50 380.50 (Deficit) 105.04 93.62 69.62 57.94 41.49 24.18 Existing 147.10 147.10 147.10 147.10 147.10 147.10 2009 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 (Deficit) 9.38 3.65 -8.34 -14.18 -22.36 -31.06 40 VI ‐ 8 Map VI – 1: Inventory of Public Parks, Recreation Facilities and Open Space 41 VI ‐ 9 42 VI ‐ 10 B. INTRODUCTION The quality of life for Winter Springs’ residents is linked closely to the development and management of a well-maintained, accessible system of public parks, trails and open space. The City is well known for its award-winning Central Winds Park and the quality of recreational programs and events offered there. Such facilities play a key role in shaping both the landscape and the quality of life of Winter Springs’ residents through the conservation of natural resources and provision of recreational facilities. It is the intent of the City to provide an appropriate balance of both active and passive recreation for the community. The quality of life for residents of Winter Springs is not only linked to the availability of a well-maintained system of public park and recreation facilities, but also to the quality of the natural resources they contain. Privately managed parks, open space and facilities provide additional components of the open space and recreational system serving City residents. As additional parks are developed, consideration for the balance between conservation issues and the provision of active recreation becomes an important ingredient in the park development process. The City’s lead office in charge of parks and recreational programs is the Parks and Recreation Department. The purpose of this data is to identify existing and planned open space and recreation facilities, review Level of Service (LOS) standards for these facilities, and analyze current and projected park and recreational needs which support the Recreation and Open Space Element. The Element includes specific goals, objectives, and policies to guide the provision of recreation and open space facilities through the year 20302040. C. INVENTORY OF EXISTING RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE FACILITIES Parks conserve open space and natural resources and provide recreation opportunities. In general, parks are categorized as being either activity-based or resource-based. Activity-based parks provide user-oriented, recreation facilities designed for a specific purpose such as tennis, basketball, softball or soccer, while resource-based parks utilize the natural environment to provide more passive activities such as picnicking, hiking, fishing, swimming, or boating. The City provides a wide range of recreation opportunities to its residents. The City’s park inventory includes numerous parks and recreational facilities where citizens can enjoy both active and passive forms of recreation. (See Table VI-2: Inventory of Public Parks and Recreational Facilities and Open Space, 20092020). 1. Public Parks and Open Space The public park system within Winter Springs includes approximately 380.5 410.88 acres. This acreage includes City-owned parks and open space, as well as State and County- owned recreational facilities located within the City limits, such as the Cross Seminole Trail . (Jetta Point County Park is not currently included, but will be included once developed.) Map VI-1 illustrates the public park system. Also included are Seminole County facilities located near the City. City parks have been classified in congruence with guidelines set forth in Florida’s Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (20072019) published by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code (FAC). The categories utilized by the City include regional parks (State and County), community parks, neighborhood parks, tot lots, urban plazas and squares, and open space. Only sites that are publicly owned have been included in this section. 43 VI ‐ 11 As noted on Table VI-2, many City parks offer both passive and active recreation opportunities. Some examples are Central Winds Park, Ranchlands Park, and Sam Smith Park, all of which offer active recreational facilities as well as passive areas for fishing and picnicking. a. Regional Parks Regional Parks are large, resource-based parks serving more than two communities and featuring outdoor recreation resources and facilities that capitalize on and promote appreciation of the natural environment. Regional parks should serve a population of over 100,000 (generally located within an hour’s driving distance of the park) and should range in size from a minimum of 250 acres to as much as several thousand acres. The City relies on the State and the County for the provision and maintenance of regional parks. There are numerous regional resource-based parks and wilderness areas accessible to the City’s residents (see Florida Managed Habitat Conservation Areas Map located in the Conservation Element). Florida State Parks within 25 miles of Winter Springs include: Driving Distance* Name of Recreational Area Acreage: 12.5 miles Wekiva Springs State Park 69009,504 23 miles Rock Springs Run State Reserve 1500014,165 23 miles Lower Wekiva River Preserve State Park 1765017,375 23 miles Lake Lotus Park 120 *driving mileage taken from Winter Springs Town Center St John’s River Water Management District Recreation Lands include: Driving Distance*: Name of Recreational Area: Acreage: 9.2 miles Lake Jesup Conservation Area 52576,220 11.7 miles Little-Big Econ State Forest 956310,279 25 miles Buck Lake Conservation Area 96389,606 25 miles Seminole Ranch Conservation Area 292236,000 *driving mileage taken from Winter Springs Town Center Seminole County Wilderness and Preserve Areas include: Driving Distance* Name of Recreational Area: Acreage: 3.8 miles Spring Hammock Preserve 1,500 (includes Environmental Studies Center) 6.9 miles Black Hammock Wilderness Area 700 8.5 miles Lake Jesup Wilderness Area 490 10.5 miles Black Bear Wilderness Area 1,650 10.6 miles Econ River Wilderness Area 240 10.8 miles Geneva Wilderness Area (Includes Ed Yarborough Nature C) 180 13.6 miles Lake Procter Wilderness Area 475 44 VI ‐ 12 15.7 miles Chuluota Wilderness Area 625 *driving mileage taken from Winter Springs Town Center Source: FDEP Division of Recreation and Parks, September 2019; Greenways Natural Lands Seminole County, September 2019; St. Johns River Water Management District September 2019. Trails (in or near Winter Springs): A network of trails provides a range of economic, aesthetic, environmental and recreation benefits to citizens of a community, beyond the benefits that accrue to private landowners. A trails network can increase residential and commercial property values, encourage the revitalization of declining area, attract tourist, and provide an alternative to the use of automobiles that can help reduce traffic congestion. The City has participated in regional trail planning and development activities in recent years that have substantially increased access to trail recreational opportunities for City residents. Cross Seminole Trail The Florida Department of Environmental Protection’s Office of Greenways and Trails owns, and has sub-leased to Seminole County, the Cross Seminole Trail, a portion of which is located in Winter Springs. The Seminole County Parks and Recreation Department is in charge of maintaining the trail. An interlocal agreement exists between the City and Seminole County regarding use and maintenance of the Cross Seminole Trail. The City’s Parks and Recreation Department assisted with the design of the restroom facility located at the Black Hammock Trailhead (State Road 434 at State Road 417 (Seminole Expressway), and is responsible for the maintenance and cleaning of the restroom facility. The Cross Seminole Trail begins at its connection to the Cady Way Trail just south of Aloma and Howell Branch in Winter Park. It heads north for 23 miles where it connects to the Seminole Wekiva Trail at the pedestrian bridge over Interstate 4 in Lake Mary. The trail near and through Winter Springs currently runs six (6) miles from through Layer Elementary School in Winter Springs to the intersection of State Road 434 and State Road 426 in downtown Oviedo to Layer Elementary in Winter Springs, where a small gap is exists. Other built sections of the trail include from CR 46A south to Green Way Boulevard in Lake Mary and from Mikler Road to the Orange County Line. The Cross Seminole Trail connects with the Seminole Wekiva Trail via the I-4 Pedestrian Bridge in Lake Mary. Upon completion, the Cross Seminole Trail will be a 34.5 mile long continuous trail connecting Altamonte Springs, Longwood, Lake Mary, Winter Springs, and Oviedo and connecting to the Cady Way Trail and the Orange County Trail System. The trail will run from Spring Hammock Preserve in Winter Springs to Howell Branch Road at the Orange County Line and will connect several parks including: Central Winds Park, Soldier’s Creek Park, Big Tree Park, Greenwood Lakes Park, Sweetwater Creek Park, Lawton House Park, and Spring Hammock. The trail will also connects seven schools: Layer Elementary, Winter Springs High School, Indian Trails Middle School, Keeth Elementary, Trinity Preparatory School, Oviedo High School, and Lawton Elementary, and Choices in Learning Charter School. 45 VI ‐ 13 New segments of Tthe Cross Seminole Trail is currentlyinclude segments under construction from the Oviedo Mall to State Road 434. Design is complete on the segment from, Mikler Road to Red Bug Lake Road, including Road and construction is scheduled to begin in late 2008. Aa pedestrian overpass is programmed to be constructed over Red Bug Lake Road beginning in the fall 2008, with a connection to State Road 426 near the Oviedo Mall. The trail will also bewas also realigned by the FDOT State Road 426 widening project. The trail will and crosses at the signalized intersection of Marketplace Boulevard Blvd & State Road 426, and which connects with the trail corridor along Aulin Avenue. Map VI- 2 depicts existing and future portions of the Cross Seminole Trail. 46 VI ‐ 14 Map VI - 2: Seminole County Trails Construction Map 47 VI ‐ 15 Florida National Scenic Trail The Florida National Scenic Trail was congressionally established in 1983 and is a hiking trail network that provides access to scenic wilderness areas. A portion of the Cross Seminole Trail coincides with the Florida National Scenic Trail. The Great Florida Birding Trail The Great Florida Birding Trail is a program of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, supported in part by the Florida Department of Transportation and the Wildlife Foundation of Florida. In Seminole County, self- guided designated trails are included at the Little-Big Econ State Forest, the Lake Procter Wilderness Area, and the Geneva Wilderness Area. Econlockhatchee River Paddling Trail The Econlockhatchee River Paddling Trail is officially designated as part of Florida’s Statewide System of Greenways and Trails. Access to this scenic wilderness river is provided via a canoe launch site beginning 2.5 miles northwest of Chuluota on State Road 419 (only 11 miles driving distance from Winter Springs). The trail winds eastward through 18-miles of forested flatlands, swamps, and pasture, and eventually feeds into the St. John’s River. This river flows northeasterly to its junction with the St. Johns River where the trail ends 1.5 miles downstream (north) of the confluence. Bear Creek Nature Trail Bear Creek Nature Trail, owned and maintained by the City, provides a passive area with a .5 mile nature trail paralleling Bear Creek. b. Community Parks Community parks are defined as “ride to” parks that should be located near major streets or arterials. Community parks are designed to serve the needs of four to six neighborhoods that have residents within a radius of up to three (3) miles. Typical facilities found in community parks are designed to serve all ages and may include both passive and active recreation opportunities such as playground areas, recreation buildings, sports fields, paved multipurpose courts, picnic areas, open or free play areas, swimming pools, and landscaping. Community parks include: Central Winds Park, Sunshine Park, Torcaso Park, Trotwood Park, Blumberg Blvd. (Blumberg Park) and Veteran’s Memorial in the Town Center and, the Black Hammock Trailhead., and the future Jetta Point County Park. Some parks may fall under more than one category. Most County parks are considered community parks, but those that host national competitions and tournaments can easily be classified as regional parks. Central Winds Park, located on Lake Jesup, for instance, has been classified as a community park, due to its geographic area and the type of recreational facilities and activities offered. However, numerous civic festivals and special events are held in the park, drawing citizens from all over Seminole County and the Central Florida area. For this reason, Central Winds Park has been locally considered a regional park. This park offers competition quality baseball, softball, and soccer fields, which are reserved for league-play only, as well as basketball courts, volleyball courts, horseshoes, 48 VI ‐ 16 playground, concession stand, the City’s Parks & Recreation Office, and restrooms. Additionally, a passive area located on the west side includes a fishing area, pavilions, picnic grills, and an amphitheatre. A recent expansion to the park added additional baseball, softball, and soccer/football fields, as well as lacrosse fields and a dog park with large dog, small dog and training areas. Together, the Central Winds Park and the expansion total 98.5 acres. c. Special Use Facilities Special use facilities are designed to serve the unique recreational needs of certain population groups. The elderly are afforded the Senior Center Complex, a 13,500 square foot facility, located at Sunshine Park. The complex was expanded in 2007 and includes a new indoor therapy pool, a large multi-purpose room, billiard/game room, kitchen, restrooms, arts and crafts room, conference room, lounge area, and two offices. The therapy pool is one of only two public facilities in the County. The center is operated by City staff and a senior organization. Membership can be obtained for a reasonable fee. Members can utilize the Senior Center to enjoy the following activities: Arts & Crafts Dance Classes Bingo/ Card Playing Lunch on Wednesdays Charity Benefits Movies Social Functions Medical Examinations Computer Classes Exercise, Yoga & Tai Chi Recreation Classes Billiards Senior Field Trips The young are afforded the Civic Center Complex, a 4,000 square foot facility, also located at Sunshine Park and connected to the Senior Center by a covered breezeway. This facility includes a commercial type kitchen, restrooms, stage, and dance floor. The Civic Center offers many recreational opportunities for the young, including the Winter Springs Summer Youth Program. During the program, children have the opportunity to participate in activities such as trips and tours, swimming, arts and crafts, and outdoor games. Additionally, the Civic Center offers meeting space for Boy/Girl Scouts, civic, religious and private organizations, charity benefits, City meetings/training/parties, homeowners associations, etc. The Civic Center Complex also offers rental of the facility for weddings, receptions and parties. Both the Senior Center and the Civic Center are wheelchair accessible. 49 VI ‐ 17 d. Neighborhood Parks Neighborhood Parks are “walk to” parks that are generally located along streets where people can walk or bicycle without encountering heavy traffic. They serve the population of a neighborhood in a radius of up to one-half (1/2) of a mile. A neighborhood park size usually ranges from 2 to 10 acres. Typical facilities provided include playground areas, recreation buildings, sports fields, paved multi-purpose courts, picnic areas, open or free play areas, and landscaping. Neighborhood parks include Moss Park, Sam Smith Park, Ranchlands Park, and Bear Creek Nature Trail. e. Mini-Parks and Tot-Lots Mini-parks are small facilities that serve a concentrated or limited population, as well as specific groups such as toddlers. Mini-parks include tot-lots and are designed to serve the needs of a neighborhood within a radius of up to six (6) blocks. A minimum of one half (1/2) acre for each stand-alone park is recommended. Mini-parks primarily offer passive recreation and typical facilities provided include playground areas, benches, open space, picnic tables, and landscaping. Mini-parks include Diane’s Park, Fruitwood Park, Winding Hollow, Oak Hollow, Market Square and Magnolia Square. Most of the neighborhood and community parks offer the facilities typically found in tot-lots and mini-parks. Many homeowner associations include private recreational facilities within their developments. In many cases, these serve as private mini-parks to those residents. f. Open Space The term “open space” is widely used with a variety of meanings. However, its meaning herein (and throughout the Comprehensive Plan) is taken from Rule 9J-5 Florida Administrative Code and simply means,is “undeveloped lands suitable for passive recreation or conservation.” Open space does not refer to land found in medians, buffers, or retention areas. In Winter Springs, most of the publicly-owned open space was conveyed to the City at the time of subdivision platting, as “parks” or “parkland”. However, most of these areas are composed of undevelopable wetlands, such as the 69.5-acre Tuscawilla Open Space donation. Winding Hollow subdivision also includes a large 55-acre open space with only .5-acre in addition, available for active recreation. Not all open space or conservation areas within Winter Springs are owned by the City, many are privately owned. However, only City-owned open space is inventoried within this Element and included on Table VI-2 (with one exception - the Hickory Grove Park in the Town Center is included, but it is owned by the State Office of Greenways and Trails). g. Urban Plazas and Squares “Urban plazas” or “squares” are small urban pocket parks which vary in size from 1/10-acre to several acres depending on their intended use. Their primary function is to intersperse congested urban environments with aesthetically pleasing 50 VI ‐ 18 areas for people to gather as groups or to sit individually. These plazas and squares may contain benches and tables, commemorative structures, fountains, and landscaping. Within the Town Center, numerous urban plazas and squares are planned. Several have been completed and include: Blumberg Blvd., Market Square, and a portion of Magnolia Square. Blumberg Blvd. also includes the recently completed Veteran’s Memorial, located at Tuskawilla Rd. and Blumberg Blvd. Most of these urban plazas and squares will serve as mini-parks. However, in some cases (such as Blumberg Blvd. (Blumberg Park) and the, Veteran’s Memorial, and the recently acquired pocket park along Michael Blake Blvd.), these facilities serve as community parks because of the activities offered there and the significance of the facilities. Table VI-2 shows an inventory of public parks and recreational facilities and open space within Winter Springs. Table VI - 2: Inventory of Public Parks and Recreational Facilities and Open Space, 20092020 Parks Active Acres Passive Acres (1) Total Acres Resources and Facilities Trails Bear Creek Nature Trail 0.0 8.7 8.7 Natural Resources: Creek, environmentally sensitive area. Recreational Facilities: None Other: 1/2-mile nature trail Black Hammock Trailhead ** (acreage included in Cross Seminole Trail) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Natural Resources: None Recreational Facilities: Cross Seminole Trail Other: Paved Parking and Restrooms Florida National Scenic Trail ** 0.0 4.4 4.4 Natural Resources: Wetlands Recreational Facilities: None Other: Undeveloped Cross Seminole Trail ** 0.0 59.4 59.4 Natural Resources: Creek, natural vegetation Recreational Facilities: Paved Trail Other: 6-miles in the City connecting with regional trail system Community Parks Blumberg Park Blumberg Blvd. ** & Veteran’s Memorial ** 0.0 1.44.26 1.44.26 Natural Resources: None Recreational Facilities: Adjacent to Cross Seminole Trail Other: Fountains, pergolas, walkways, seating, manicured landscaping. Veteran’s memorial with sculpture. 51 VI ‐ 19 Central Winds Park 78.6 20.4 21.44 98.5 100.04 Natural Resources: Nature/Environmentally sensitive area. Recreational Facilities: 4 baseball fields, 4 softball fields, 7 soccer, 1 football field, 2 multi- purpose fields (football/lacrosse) 8 multipurpose fields (soccer/frisbee/football/lacrosse)1 half basketball court, 2 volleyball courts, 2 youth playgrounds. Other: Dog park (small dog, large dog and training areas), fishing area, grass amphitheater & event space w/ power and stage platform, nature trail, cooking grills, 2 picnic pavilions, parks & recreation office, concession stand, restrooms Sunshine Park (a) 6.7 3.5 10.2 Natural Resources: Lake (1.5-acres) Recreational FacilitiesRec. Facilities: 2 baseball fields, 1 3 softball fields, 1 full basketball court, 1 volleyball court., 1 tot playground, 1 youth playground. 1 pickelball court, 1 horse shoe pit, 1 shuffle board court Other: Civic Center, Senior Center with indoor therapy pool, fishing area, cooking grills , 2 1 picnic pavilions, restrooms Torcaso Park 4.8 3.19 7.87.99 Natural Resources: Pond (1.9- acres) Recreational Facilities: 4 2 full sized basketballs with lighting shooting baskets, 1 volleyball court, 1 soccer/footballmultipurpose field, exercise course, 1 tot playground, one youth playground . Other: Fishing area, splash pad water fountain, picnic pavilion, cooking grills, restrooms Trotwood Park 23.0 5.0 28.0 Natural Resources: Lake Tuskawilla (6.4-acres) and smaller lake (1.6- acres) Recreational FacilitiesRec. Facilities: 2 baseball fields, 1 3 softball fields, 4 soccer fieldsmultipurpose fields, 2 full basketball courts, 2 tennis courts, 4 pickelball courts, adult fitness area 2 racquet ball courts, 1 volleyball court, 1 tot playground, 1 youth 52 VI ‐ 20 playground, 1 splash playground. Other: Fishing pier, cooking grills, 3 4picnicmedium pavilions, 1 4,000 sq. ft. pavilion restrooms Unnamed Pocket Park (0621315080P100000) 0.0 0.36 0.36 Proposed Pocket Park Neighborhood Parks Moss Park 2.00 0.3 2.3 Natural Resources: None Creek Recreational Facilities: Rec. Facilities: 1 full basketball court, 1 multi-purpose field, 1 youth playground, 1 tot playground. Other: cooking grills, 2 1 picnic pavilions, restrooms Ranchlands Park 0.5 0.5 1.0 Natural Resources: Lake (11.5- acres) Recreational Facilities: Rec. Facilities: 1 volleyball court 2 cornhole courts, 1 outdoor table tennis, 1 BBQ grill Other: Fishing area, cooking grills1 picnic pavilion Sam Smith Park 0.00 8.3 8.3 Natural Resources: Lake (4.6- acres), nature area Recreational Facilities: Rec. Facilities: 1 tot playground, 1 youth playground. Other: Fishing area, cooking grills, 2 picnic pavilions, restroom Mini Parks Dianes Park 0.0 1.0 1.0 Natural Resources: None Recreational Facilities: None. Other: Picnic table, cooking grill. 53 VI ‐ 21 Fruitwood Park 0.30 0.0 0.3 Natural Resources: Lake (2.1-acres) Recreational Facilities: 1 youth playground Other: None Magnolia Square 0.00 0.3 0.3 Natural Resources: None. Recreational Facilities:Rec. Facilities: Adjacent to Cross Seminole Trail Other: Fountain and seating Oak Hollow Park (linear park) 0.00 1.0 1.0 Natural Resources: None Recreational Facilities: 2 youth playgrounds Other: Paved walking trail (0.1 miles) Winding Hollow Park (b) 0.5 0.0 0.5 Natural Resources: Adjacent to natural open space Recreational Facilities: 1 tot playground, 1 youth playground Other: 1 Picnic pavilions, cooking grills Open Space Alton Creek 0.0 0.2 0.2 Natural Resources: Creek Recreational Facilities: None Other: Conservation Foxmoor Park Unit 1 0.0 1.9 1.9 Natural Resources: Wetlands Recreational Facilities:: None Other: None Foxmoor Unit 2 0.0 1.6 1.6 Natural Resources: Lake (2.1-acres); Wetlands Recreational Facilities: None Other: None Foxmoor Unit 3 0.0 4.89 4.89 Natural Resources: Lake (1.0-acres); Wetlands Recreational Facilities: None Other: None 54 VI ‐ 22 Hickory Grove Park ** (Town Center) 0.0 4.5 4.5 Natural Resources: Native hickory trees Recreational Facilities: None North Orlando Ranches Sec. 5 0.0 6.7 6.7 Natural Resources: Wetlands Recreational Facilities: None Other: Conservation North Orlando Ranches Sec. 9 0.0 6.5 6.5 Natural Resources: Wetlands Recreational Facilities: None Other: Conservation North Orlando Ranches Sec. 10 0.0 5.1 5.1 Natural Resources: Wetlands Recreational Facilities: None Other: Conservation North Orlando Terrace Sec. 5 0.0 7.2 7.2 Natural Resources: Wetlands Recreational Facilities: None Other: Conservation North Orlando Terrace Sec. 9 0.0 7.4 7.4 Natural Resources: Wetlands Recreational Facilities: None Other: Conservation Tuscawilla Open Space 0.0 69.5 69.5 Natural Resources: Wetlands Recreational Facilities: None Other: Conservation Unnamed Park (2620305AR0A00007N) 0.00 3.82 3.82 Natural Resources: Wetlands Wetland Park (3120315TC000000B0) 0.0 22.92 22.92 Natural Resources: Wetlands Other: Conservation Winding Hollow Park (b) 0.0 31.6 31.6 Natural Resources: Wetlands Recreational Facilities: None Other: Conservation Total Open Space 0 147.1175.43 147.1175.43 Total Overall Park Llands 115.9116.40 264.6294.48 380.5 410.88 55 VI ‐ 23 Note- Lacrosse is growing in popularity and can be played on soccer, football and multi-use fields. (1) Passive Acres includes both developed areas as well as undeveloped open space acreage. Lake acreage is not included. (2) Acreage is from the City’s Geographic Information System mapping. Lake acreage is not included. (a) Park is a Special Use Facility (b) One-half acre of this park is developed for active recreational use. 55.5 acres are conservation land. * Seminole County-owned ** State-owned (Greenways and Trails) Source: City of Winter Springs Parks and Recreation Department, January 2009 2021 h. Nearby County Facilities Seminole County operates and maintains several park and open space facilities that are available to the citizens of Winter Springs. Some of the County parks closest to Winter Springs, in addition to the Cross Seminole Trail, are Overlook Park, Red Bug Lake Park, Soldier's Creek Park, and Spring Hammock Preserve. Overlook Park is a 3-acre facility located on Spring Avenue off State Road 434, west of State Road 417 (Seminole Expressway / Greeneway). The park is located on the southern shores of Lake Jesup and includes a designated State Historic Site (White’s Wharf) and Clifton Springs- a natural springs area. Amenities include a small pavilion, fishing pier and a mooring dock. Red Bug Lake Park is a 60-acre community park adjacent to the 28-acre Red Bug Lake. This park is located 2 miles east of State Road 436 on Red Bug Lake Road and offers picnicking, playgrounds, fishing, boating, tennis, racquetball, basketball, sand volleyball, softball, flag football, soccer, exercise trail, pavilions, and restrooms. Soldier’s Creek Park is a 315-acre park adjacent to the Spring Hammock Preserve, 1 mile east of U.S. 17-92 on State Road 419. The park offers soccer fields and ball fields, which are used by community groups for youth baseball and softball. Spring Hammock Preserve offers visitors access to more than 1,500 acres of wilderness on the western border of Lake Jesup. Highlights of opportunities offered within the Spring Hammock Preserve are the Environmental Studies Center (located on the east side of State Road 419), nature trails, boardwalks, and fishing at Soldier's Creek, and "The Senator," a 3,500 year-old Cypress tree located at Big Tree County Park.. Facilities provided within the Seminole County Park System include: Lakes and Rivers with Boat Ramps Overlook Piers Canoe Launch Support Facilities (including Restrooms and Paved Parking) Mooring Dock Wildlife Fishing Piers Natural Vegetation and Marsh Lands with Environmental Learning Center Boardwalks Wildlife Wilderness Areas with Wildlife Campgrounds And Primitive Camping Hiking/Biking Trails Horseback Riding Trails 56 VI ‐ 24 Sports And Recreation Facilities Basketball Courts Kids Playgrounds Tennis Courts Picnic Pavilions Racquetball Courts Support Facilities (Including Restrooms, Paved Parking, and Lighting) Roller Hockey Rink Dog Parks Sand Volleyball Courts Historically Significate Sites Soccer/Football Fields Jogging Trails/Exercise Stations Softball/Baseball Fields Seminole County plans to construct Jetta Point Park on a 43-acre site within Winter Springs, south of State Road 434 just west of its intersection with State Road 417 (Seminole Expressway / Greeneway). The new Jetta Point County Park will serve as an intensive-use sports complex with a concentration of facilities for leagues and tournaments. It is expected to host national softball competitions as well as soccer/lacrosse and will also include youth playground, tot playground, a boardwalk, picnic pavilion and restrooms. The new park will be adjacent to the existing Black Hammock Trailhead of the Cross Seminole Trail. Upon completion of Jetta Point Park, Soldier’s Creek County Park will be converted to baseball facilities for leagues and tournaments Seminole County Parks include: Driving Distance* Name of Recreational Area: Acreage**: 2.7 miles Overlook Park 34 3.8 miles Soldier’s Creek Park 25315 4.2 miles Big Tree Park - Longwood 11 5.9 miles Pawmosa Dog Park - Casselberry 1 6.4 miles Sunland Park - Sanford 156 6.7 miles Lake Dot Park - Sanford 155 7.4 miles Red Bug Lake Park - Casselberry 60 7.6 miles Winwood Park - Altamonte Springs 4 7.7 miles Jamestown Park 1 8.0 miles Kewannee Park - Casselberry 6 8.5 miles Lake Jesup Park - Sanford 6 8.7 miles Greenwood Lakes Park - Lake Mary 14 8.9 miles Seminole Co. Softball Complex 38 9.4 miles Sanlando Park - Altamonte Springs 40 10.3 miles Paw Park- Sanford 1 10.4 miles Little Big Econ Park (Canoe Launch) 13 57 VI ‐ 25 11.4 miles Seminole County Sports Complex 22 11. 8 miles Lake Mills Park - Chuluota 5040 12.7 miles Roseland Park - Sanford 12 12.8 miles Midway Park - Sanford 2 13. 9 miles Lake Monroe Wayside Park - Sanford 3.54 15.3 miles Cameron Wight Park- Sanford 3 17.3miles Bookertown Park 4 17.6 miles C.S. Lee Park - Geneva 3 19.3 miles Mullet Lake Park -– Geneva 151 20.0 miles Sylvan Lake Park -– Sanford 126 21.2 miles Wilson’s Landing Park – Sanford 19 *driving mileage taken from Winter Springs Town Center ** acreage does not include lakes i. School Facilities The City maintains an Interlocal Agreement with the School Board of Seminole County related to recreational use of educational facilities. The agreement states that the two parties concur to collectively utilize the recreational and educational facilities of Winter Springs High School. Through this agreement, Parks and Recreation conducts youth basketball leagues and camps, youth football games, and all sports training programs at Winter Springs High School, as well as . Additionally, youth basketball leagues and programs, as well as and special City events., including the annual Halloween Dance, are held at Indian Trails Middle School. In addition, the City has a cooperative arrangement with several of the local school principals for co-use of their facilities. 2. Private Facilities Some recreational facilities and services such as golf courses, dance studios, fitness clubs, movie theatres, etc. are provided by the private sector, and are available to the public through a membership or a fee. The provision for this type of recreational resources is normally based on market studies. Therefore, it can be assumed that the quantity of such resources will increase as the city's population increases. Some of the Private Recreational Facilities in or near Winter Springs Tuscawilla Country Club & Golf Course 1500 Winter Springs Blvd., Winter Springs Florida Airboat Association, Inc. 200 N. Cortez Ave. Lifestyle Fitness 5852 Red Bug Lake Rd. Pro Flight Archery 280 E. State Road 434 Sadkane School for Dance & Aikido 1196 Tree Swallow Dr 1013 W. SR 434, Casselberry 58 VI ‐ 26 Studio 5D Dance Studio 1303 - 1323 Winter Springs Blvd Russian Academy of Ballet 1425 Tuskawilla Rd (formerly Orlando City Ballet) Bounce and Fun 135 E Bahama Rd O’Mei Wshu USA 113 E State Road 434 United Theatres of Florida, Inc. I-4 & HW 436, Altamonte Springs AMC Interstate Theatres 473 Cardinal Oaks Ct., Lake Mary Regal Cinema Oviedo Crossing 22 1500 Oviedo Mktpl. Blvd., Oviedo Central Sports Heaven Batting Cages 1271 Belle AvenueAve.,Winter Springs YMCA 7900 Red Bug Lake Rd., Oviedo Planet Obstacle 1150 Emma Oaks Trail, Lake Mary Boing 532 S. Econ Circle, Oviedo Other private recreational facilities are found in residential developments within Winter Springs. The facilities provided typically include community/exercise rooms, swimming pools, tennis courts, etc. Some of the developments providing this type of recreation are listed in Table VI - 3: Inventory of Private Recreational Facilities, 2008 2020. [Note: some data still being gathered.]. Table VI - 3: Inventory of Private Recreational Facilities, 2008 2020 NOTE: This inventory does not include all the private recreational facilities in the City, but accounts for many of those within residential subdivisions which have one or more acres of activity-based recreational opportunities. Source: Winter Springs Planning Division, FebruaryDecember 2020. D. EXISTING AND FUTURE PARKS AND RECREATION NEEDS Recreational demands do not remain constant over time, but grow with population increases and change as population demographics change. Attitudes and opinions can be drastically altered from a shift in the demographic makeup of a community. Therefore, it is necessary to assess recreational needs and future demands for facilities in order to plan for the future. Development/Facility Name Pool Club house Golf Course Shuffle Board Basketball Tennis Playground Volleyball Other Highlands PUD 3 1 1 5 5 1 Trail Wildwood PUD 1 2 1 Trail Seminole Pines 1 1 1 1 Tuscawilla Country Club 1-18 hole 8 Hacienda Village 2 2 1 Howell Creek/Eagles Watch 1 1 1 1 Integra 360 1 1 Trail The Blake 1 1 The Rize 1 1 Southern Oaks 1 Tuskawilla Crossings 1 1 1 Trail Wedgewood 1 1 Winter Springs Village 2 2 1 Trail 59 VI ‐ 27 1. Population Trends and User Needs The City’s population is projected anticipated to increase by over 10,000by over 7,000 residents by 2030 2040. According to the U.S. Census, the median age increased from 34 to 37 from 1990 to 2000 to 42 in 2010 and is estimated at 43 in 2017., and t The percentage of persons aged 65 or older increased from 9.2% to 10.8% over the same time periodfrom 1990 to 2000 and continued to increase to 17.4% of the population according to the 2013-2017 American Community Survey (ACS) estimates. The projected median age (US Census) increased to 40 by 2007. This trend is expected to continue through the long-term planning period. The City is well prepared to serve an aging population. During 2007, the City completed a 9,200 square foot expansion of the Senior Center which added a new therapy pool along with a large multi-purpose room. However, the City should continue to add recreational facilities and programs which address the changing demographics of the City, while continuing to support a wide variety of programs to serve all of its residents. To accurately reflect changes in public demand, tools are needed to identify them. One method is to survey the citizens for their input. The City has conducted several informal surveys, many of which have not been documented. A City-wide survey was conducted in 1990. It questioned residents about the recreational activities they practiced on a regular basis. The results showed that, at that time, residents wanted more playgrounds, baseball fields, swimming pools, bike paths, and tennis courts. Since that time, the City has added numerous playgrounds and baseball fields, and the State has added the Cross Seminole Trail. This type of survey should be conducted regularly on a five-year basis to maintain consistency and to monitor progress and changing demands. An opinion survey of registered voters was completed in 2004, to explore interest and support for a multi- purpose athletic facility and an aquatic center. The support was greatest for the multi- purpose athletic center with 44 percent of those surveyed in support of such a facility even if it increased property taxes, 21 percent opposed and 35 percent requiring more information. Support dropped slightly (40 percent) and opposition increased (32 percent) for an aquatic center. Support fell further (36 percent) to a level nearly equal with opposition (35 percent) when respondents were asked if they would support both facilities with a combined tax increase necessary to support both facilities. During the Winter Springs 2030 and Beyond survey in 2019, a number of questions focused on parks and recreation and open space. Purchase of green space (i.e. natural lands) was a top priority for residents. Comments strongly suggested including arts, culture and theatre into recreation programming. Other comments included natural resource activities such as fishing and biking, a community pool and providing for more facilities/fields for a variety of sports. Willingness to fund facilities through increased taxes scored below a neutral rating at 2.95. Comments made it evident that a tax increase was not truly the way to go. Suggestions included looking in the budget for reallocation, user and event fees, partnership with the high school, or finding other sources of funding. Proponents in support of using tax dollars to pay for recreation facilities provided comments that if there was an increase it should be for specific projects vetted by the public and be primarily uses for natural areas, arts/culture or an aquatic center. Not only did the option of “Funding for a Sporting Complex” rate unfavorably (2.11), the comments provided were very clear that there are already existing larger facilities throughout Seminole County and there are plenty of existing facilities in the City. There were concerns about traffic, costs, and the large amount of greenspace that would be lost. Additional comments also focused on the need for arts and culture facilities. When asked about priorities for the City, the City-Wide Interconnected Trail System 60 VI ‐ 28 ranked highest (35%), followed by the Lake Jesup Boardwalk (26%). The Aquatic Center ranked next (20%), followed by the Library (12%). Indoor Recreation was the lowest ranking option (8%). In addition, during the development of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan 2020, a recreational survey was administered to the residents. 2. Outdoor Recreation Planning Guidelines Three types of guidelines are commonly used in outdoor recreation planning according to Florida’s Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (20072019). The first type, use guidelines, are employed as a means of stating the amount of use a resource or facility can accommodate under certain conditions. The second type,- population guidelines, are used in determining the amount of resources and facilities that are required to serve a given population. The third type- site guidelines, are used primarily for estimating acreage needs for local parks and recreation areas and open space. Many variations exist in outdoor recreation environments. Therefore, each jurisdiction must determine for its planning purposes how these guidelines will best serve their interests and in most cases develop their own guidelines. Table VI-4 identifies the median value of the survey results for nine user- oriented facilities for which information on use was collected. Table VI - 4: Use Guidelines for User-Oriented Recreation Activities, 20072019 Activity Resource/Facility Guideline Physical exercise (urban jogging and hiking) Racquetball/Handball Swimming Tennis Linear mile of exercise/parcours trail Racquetball/Handball Court Shuffleboard Court Swimming Pool (1) Tennis Court 100 users per mile of trail per day 40 users per court per day 20 users per court per day 256 users per pool per day 30 users per court per day Activity Baseball/Softball Basketball Golf Resource/Facility Baseball/Softball Field Basketball Court Football/Soccer Field Golf Course (9-hole) Guideline 120 users per field per day 90 users per court per day 175 users per field per day 200 users per 9-hole course per da 61 VI ‐ 29 Activity Resource/Facility Guideline Baseball/Softball Basketball/Softball Field 120 users per field per day Basketball Basketball Court 90 users per court per day Football/Soccer/Rugby Football/Soccer Field 175 users per field per day Golf Golf Course (9‐hole) 200 users per 9‐hole course per day Physical exercise (urban jogging and hiking) Linear mile of exercise/parcourse trails 100 users per mile of trail per day Racquetball/Handball Racquetball / Handball Court 40 users per court per day Shuffleboard Shuffleboard Court 20 users per court per day Swimming Swimming Pool (1) 256 users per pool per day Tennis Tennis Court 30 users per court per day Source: Florida’s Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (20072019). Population guidelines are hypothetical estimates of the amounts of outdoor recreation resources and facilities that are required to support a given population. Generally, population guidelines make no distinction between the varying requirements of different segments of the population, but are used to assess community recreational needs by determining the minimum number of resources and facilities required to serve the local population. When used in concert with facility use guidelines and park/open space site guidelines, population guidelines can prove a useful tool in outdoor recreation planning. Table VI-45 identifies populatiopopulation and usen guidelines for user-oriented recreational activities. Site guidelines are a set of general criteria for determining the specific types and amounts of park lands necessary to accommodate the recreational needs of local communities. The criteria define the acreage, facility type and service area requirements for various types of community recreation sites and areas. They are most commonly used as a means of expressing outdoor recreation needs, based on population guidelines. The site guidelines described in Table VI-6 are graphically applied to the City and depicted on Map VI-5. The areas not served by existing parks primarily are parts of the City having larger lot sizes in some cases, are areas still to be developed, such as the Greeneway Interchange District. 62 VI ‐ 30 Table VI - 5: Population and Use Guidelines for User-Oriented Recreation Activities, 2008 2020 Facility Location Existing number Population Guideline (Min/Med/Max) Use Guideline Actual Baseball Fields* Central Winds Park (4) Sunshine Park (2) Trotwood Park (2) 8 fields 1/2,000 1/5,000 1/10,000 120 users per field per day 1/3,182 Softball Fields* Central Winds Park (4) Sunshine Park (1) Trotwood Park (1) 6 fields 1/2,000 1/5,000 1/10,000 120 users per field per day 1/3,182 Basketball Court Central Winds Park (1 half) Moss Park (1 full) Sunshine Park (1 full) Torcaso Park (4 shooting baskets) Trotwood Park (2 full) 9 public 2 private 1/500 1/5,000 1/20,000 90 users per court per day 1/4,052 Bicycle Ways Cross Seminole Trail 14 miles (6 miles in City) 1 mi/1,500 1 mi/5,000 1 mi/10,000 100 users per mile of trail per day 1 mi/3,180 Football Fields* Central Winds Park (1 1 field 1/4,000 1/6,000 1/25,000 175 users per field per day 1/3,428 Lacrosse Fields * Can be played on any soccer, football and/or multi‐use fields. No dedicated fields 1/4,000 1/6,000 1/25,000 175 users per field per day Soccer Fields* Central Winds Park (7) Trotwood Park (4) Torcaso Park (1) 12 fields 1/4,000 1/6,000 1/25,000 175 users per field per day Racquetball/Handball Trotwood Park (2) 2 courts 1/2,500 1/10,000 1/20,000 40 users per court per day 1/22,286 63 VI ‐ 31 Equipped Play Area Central Winds Park (2) Sunshine Park (1) Torcaso Park (1) Trotwood Park (1) Moss Park (1) Sam Smith (1) Winding Hollow (1) Oak Hollow (1) Fruitwood (1) 10 public 6 private 1/500 1/10,000 1/15,000 NA 1/2,786 Multipurpose Fields Central Winds Park (2)** Moss Park (1) 3 public 1/500 1/3,750 1/10,000 175 users per field per day 1/14,857 Tennis Courts/Pickleball Courts Trotwood Park (2 TC and 2 portable PC) 4 public 15 private 1/1,000 1/2,000 1/10,000 30 users per court per day 1/2,346 Volleyball Courts Central Winds Park (2) Sunshine Park (1) Trotwood Park (1) 4 public 1 private 1/4,000 1/6,000 1/12,000 NA 1/11,143 Swimming Pools Senior Center Therapy Pool, Sunshine Park (1) 1 public 15 private 1/1,000 1/25,000 1/50,000 256 users per pool per day 1/44,572 (public) 1/2,786 (incl. private) Note- Lacrosse is growing in popularity and can be played on any soccer, football and multi-use fields. *DEP combines baseball and softball, and soccer and football. ** Includes the amphitheater Source: Florida’s Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (2007) and City of Winter Springs, September, 2008. 64 VI ‐ 32 Facility Location Existing Population Guideline Actual Baseball Fields* Softball Fields* Basketball Court Bicycle ways Football Fields* Lacrosse Fields* Soccer Fields* Handball Central Winds Park (4) Sunshine Park (2) Trotwood Park (2) Central Winds Park (4) Sunshine Park (1) Trotwood Park (1) Central Winds Park (1 half) Moss Park (1 full, 1 half) Sunshine Park (1 full) Torcaso Park (4 shooting baskets) Trotwood Park (2 full) Cross Seminole Trail Central Winds Park (1) Can be played on any soccer, football and/or multi-use fields. Central Winds Park (7) Trotwood Park (4) Torcaso Park (1) Trotwood Park (2) 8 fields 6 fields 10 9 public 2 private 14 miles (6 miles in the City) 1 fields No fields 12 fields 2 courts 1/2,000 1/5,000 1/10,000 1/500 1/5,000 1/20,000 1 mi/1,500 1 mi/5,000 1 mi/10,000 1/4,000 1/6,000 1/25,000 1/2,500 1/10,000 1/20,000 1/2,1523,182 1/3,4434,052 1 mi/2,4603,180 1/4,3043,428 1/17,2172, 286 65 VI ‐ 33 Note- Lacrosse is growing in popularity and can be played on any soccer, football and multi-use fields. *DEP combines baseball and softball, and soccer and football. ** Includes the amphitheater Source: Florida’s Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (20072019) and City of Winter Springs, September, 2008 2020. Existing Population Guideline Equipped Play Area Central Winds Park (2 youth) Sunshine Park (1 tot, 1 youth1) Torcaso Park (1 tot, 1 youth1) Trotwood Park (1 tot, 1 youth1) Moss Park (1 tot, 1 youth1) Sam Smith (1 tot, 1 youth1) Winding Hollow (1 tot, 1 youth1) Oak Hollow (21 youth) Fruitwood (1 youth) 17 10 public 6 private 1/500 Fields Central Winds Park (2)** Moss Park (1) 3 public 1/500 1/3,750 Tennis Courts/Pickle ball Courts Trotwood Park (2 TC and 2 portable PC)) 2 4 public 15 private 1/1,067 1/2,000 Volleyball Courts Central Winds Park (2) Ranchlands Park (1) Sunshine Park (1) Torcaso Park (1) Trotwood Park (1) 6 4 public 1/4,000 1/6,000 Swimming Pools Senior Center Therapy 1 public Pool, Sunshine Park (1) 15 private 1/1,000 1/34,43344 ,572 (public) 66 VI ‐ 34 Levels of Service (LOS) Standards Level of Service (LOS) standards are a measure for determining the specific types and amounts or acreage of parkland necessary to accommodate the recreational needs of a local jurisdiction. Winter Springs has historically defined its LOS based on acreage per 1,000 residents. To better reflect the growing needs of the City for parkland, and in support of the desire for increased greenspace as further discussed under the major issue of “Population, Density, and Greenspace” (2008 Evaluation and Appraisal Report), Winter Springs will increased the Overall Parkland LOS acreage from 5 acres per 1,000 residents to 8 acres per 1,000 residents. Additionally, a LOS for Open Space has been implemented. This LOS has been set at 4 acres per 1,000 residents to encourage the provision of public open space in Winter Springs. Table VI-1 illustrates the existing park and open space acreage through 20302040, based on LOS standards. 67 VI ‐ 35 Map VI – 3: Park Service Areas Note: This Map is intended as a planning resource to illustrate distance from existing public recreation areas within the City. It is a tool to be utilized during review of Future Land Use Map - 2040 change requests and during the development review process to help ensure the continued provision of accessible recreation areas within the City. 68 VI ‐ 36 Note: This Map is intended as a planning resource to illustrate distance from existing public recreation areas within the City. It is a tool to be utilized during review of Future Land Use Map - 2030 change requests and during the development review process to help ensure the continued provision of accessible recreation areas within the City. 69 VI ‐ 37 Map VI – 4: Target Areas for New Parks Note: The light green tan area of this Map depicts “Park Target Areas”. The Map is intended as a planning resource to illustrate distance from existing public recreation areas within the City. It is a tool to be utilized during review of Future Land Use Map - 2030 2040 change requests and during the development review process to help ensure the continued provision of accessible recreation areas within the City. City-owned “open space” or lands designated with a “conservation” future land use are not depicted and some of these areas may be included within the “park target areas” designation. However, it is not the intent that these areas be developed for recreational use. Rather, these areas are to be retained for the value they provide to the public under their current designation. 70 VI ‐ 38 71 VI ‐ 39 Map VI – 5: Sites for Purchase Consideration Note: Sites are ranked alphabetically with “A” being the highest in priority, as determined by the committee. 72 VI ‐ 40 73 VI ‐ 41 3. Recreational Facilities Access to existing parks is available to many special needs groups. All of the City parks provide parking for persons with disabilities and most provide paved paths and pavilions that are wheelchair accessible. Special considerations will need to be addressed on a site- by-site basis, for deficiencies in the special access needs of these groups. For example, while people with disabilities are provided parking areas at most of the parks, and wheelchair accessibility is provided in many, internal access to facilities is still limited in a few of the City’s parks. Consideration to these access issues will need to be given at the time of new park development or renovations. According to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) ADA, an important aspect of accessibility to be considered when constructing new parks or altering existing parks, is the issue of stable ground surfacing, which allows a person with mobility impairment to negotiate with dignity. For example, a large area of loose fill such as sand or wood chips is not easily accessible. Rather, a design following ADA guidelines might use a combination of more rigid surfaces such as an engineered wood fiber, rubber surfaces along accessible routes, clear ground spaces, and maneuvering spaces, in conjunction with small areas of loose fill. Per ADA standards, consideration should be given to the general layout of youth play areas, particularly to the integration of elements and spaces that can be accessed by children who are disabled. Specifically, in areas where elevated play components are provided, additional ground level play equipment must be provided and incorporated into the same play areas. Additionally, the ADA requires that at least 50% of elevated play components must be located on an accessible route and connected by a ramp. The inclusion of soft contained play structures would also provide recreational opportunities for children with disabilities. The existing system of neighborhood and passive parks affords access to cyclists and pedestrians, as the parks are numerous and dispersed in residential areas throughout the City. Bicycle path facilities should continue to be designed so as to join recreational areas together with residential areas to upgrade the accessibility for all citizens to recreation areas. Access issues will be addressed specifically within the Goals, Objectives and Policies of this Element. 4. Meeting Future Recreation and Open Space Needs As illustrated on Table VI-1, the City does not expect to have any oOverall Parkland Park deficiencies through 20302040. The addition of Seminole County’s planned Jetta Point Park (37 acres in Winter Springs) will further increase the surplus of Overall Parkland. A slight deficiency is projected in Open Space by 2035.. However, with the conveyance of Wetland Park in the Town Center, this deficiency will be eliminated. An important action needed by the City in the immediate future is the planning of a City trail system to interconnect with the Cross Seminole Trail. The City currently owns a portion of FP&L easement which could be the beginnings of this network. In order to accomplish this, several policies relating to trails have been added to the element, as well as a new objective in support of this effort. 5. Public Participation in Recreation Planning The City has provided numerous opportunities for citizen input into the recreational planning of the City. The Parks and Recreation Department has held a number of public meetings, during which time, citizens were able to contribute their ideas and make requests for future recreational opportunities. An ad hoc advisory committee helped develop the Central Winds Expansion Master Plan. For improvements at Trotwood, neighborhoods were notified and input was requested door to door. Similar outreach has been conducted for Torcaso Park, with a Master Plan process initiated in September 2008. The City of Winter Springs finalized the Parks and Recreation Master Plan in July 2021. As noted above, the City will continue to conduct periodic surveys to identify future activity-based recreational preferences. That survey will need to identify not only preferences in terms of fields and courts, but also whether City residents would be willing to pay user fees for improved amenities, etc. 74 VI ‐ 42 During the Winter Springs 2030 and Beyond survey in 2019, a number of questions focused on parks and recreation and open space. Purchase of green space (i.e. natural lands) was a top priority for residents. Comments strongly suggested including arts, culture and theatre into recreation programming. Other comments included natural resource activities such as fishing and biking, a community pool and providing for more facilities/fields for a variety of sports. 75 VI ‐ 43 Map VI – 6: Conceptual Trails Network Map Note: This conceptual map is intended to depict a network of multi-use trails and street rights-of way for the purpose of increasing future bicycle and pedestrian travel options within the City. 76 VI ‐ 44 77 City of Winter Springs Ordinance No. 2021-08 Page 1 of 3 ORDINANCE NO. 2021-08 A ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, SETTING FORTH AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT BASED ON THE CITY’S EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PURSUANT TO SECTION 163.3191, FLORIDA STATUTES; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF PRIOR INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS; INCORPORATION INTO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; LEGAL STATUS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS; SEVERABILITY; AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Florida Legislature intends that local planning be a continuous and ongoing process; and WHEREAS, section 163.3161 et. seq., Florida Statutes, established Community Planning Act; and WHEREAS, consistent with the Community Planning Act, the City Commission has adopted the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, as required by section 163.3191, Florida Statutes, the City has conducted an evaluation of its Comprehensive Plan, Recreation and Open Space Element, to determine if plan amendments are necessary to reflect changes in state requirements since the last update of the City’s Comprehensive Plan, which is required to be adopted every seven (7) years to assess the progress of implementing the City=s Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency has reviewed the amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, Recreation and Open Space Element, set forth herein, held an advertised public hearing, provided for participation by the public in the process, and rendered its recommendations to the City Commission; and WHEREAS, the City Commission, after considering the Local Planning Agency=s review comments and recommendations for amendments to the Recreation and Open Space Element, desires to adopt the amendments set forth herein; and WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, hereby finds this 78 City of Winter Springs Ordinance No. 2021-08 Page 2 of 3 ordinance to be in the best interests of the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Winter Springs. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS HEREBY ORDAINS, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are fully incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2. Authority. This Ordinance is adopted in compliance with, and pursuant to, the Community Planning Act, Sections 163.3184 and 163.3191, Florida Statutes. Section 3. Purpose and Intent. The purpose and intent of this ordinance is to adopt text amendments to the City’s Comprehensive Plan as set forth herein, which are based on the City=s evaluation and appraisal of the Comprehensive Plan pursuant to Section 163.3191, Florida Statutes. Section 4. Adoption of Text Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, Recreation and Open Space Element. The Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan, Recreation and Open Space Element is hereby amended only as specifically enumerated and set forth in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and fully incorporated herein by this reference. (Underlined type indicates additions and strikeout type indicates deletions). It is intended that the text in the Comprehensive Plan not specifically enumerated and set forth in this Exhibit shall remain unchanged from the language existing prior to adoption of this Ordinance). Section 5. Transmittal to the Department of Economic Opportunity. The City Manager or his designee is hereby designated to sign a letter transmitting the adopted Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity for state coordinated review and to any other agency or local government providing timely comments, in accordance with Section 163.3184(4), Florida Statutes. Section 6. Repeal of Prior Inconsistent Ordinances and Resolutions. All prior inconsistent ordinances and resolutions adopted by the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, or parts of ordinances and resolutions in conflict herewith, are hereby repealed to the extent of the conflict. Section 7. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, word or provision of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, whether for substantive, procedural, or any other reason, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. Section 8. Incorporation Into Comprehensive Plan. Upon the effective date of the 79 City of Winter Springs Ordinance No. 2021-08 Page 3 of 3 Comprehensive Plan Amendments adopted by this Ordinance, said Amendments shall be incorporated into the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan and any section or paragraph number or letter and any heading may be changed or modified as necessary to effectuate the foregoing. Section 9. Effective Date and Legal Status of the Plan Amendment. The effective date of the Comprehensive Plan Amendments adopted by this Ordinance shall be pursuant to the state land planning agency’s notice of intent. If timely challenged, an amendment does not become effective until the state land planning agency or the Administration Commission enters a final order determining the adopted amendment to be in compliance as defined in section 163.3184, Florida Statutes. No development orders, development permits, or land use dependent on these Amendments may be issued or commenced before it has become effective. If a final order of noncompliance is issued by the Administration Commission, the Amendments may nevertheless be made effective by adoption of a resolution affirming its effective status. After and from the effective date of these Amendments, the Comprehensive Plan Amendments set forth herein shall amend the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan and become a part of that plan, and the Amendments shall have the legal status of the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan, as amended. ADOPTED by the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, in a regular meeting assembled on the ____ day of ________________, 2021. ____________________________________ Kevin McCann, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ Christian Gowan, City Clerk Approved as to legal form and sufficiency for the City of Winter Springs only: ______________________________________ Anthony A. Garganese, City Attorney Transmittal Hearing: _____________________ Adoption Hearing: _____________________ Effective Date: _____________________ 80 WEATHER World TodayTomorrow City HLSkies HL Beach report Boating report Hightide Lowtide WaterWindSeasWaves Nation TodayTomorrow City HLSkiesH L Rainfall Skywatch Pollen report Orlando almanac LowModerateHigh V.HighExtreme The highertheAccuWeather.comUVIndex™number,thegreatertheneedforeyeandskinprotection.Shownisthehighestvalueoftheday. —National AllergyBureau Tallahassee Leesburg Clermont Tampa Sarasota Fort Myers Key West Miami Kissimmee Melbourne Titusville Sanford DeLand Daytona Beach Gainesville Jacksonville Orlando 87/69 87/69 86/72 88/70 88/72 85/71 87/74 89/73 88/76 86/79 91/71 89/72 91/75 90/72 90/72 85/71 88/72 Today’sOrlando high:88° Acapulco 88 76 pc 88 76 Amsterdam 62 52 sh 59 52Athens7759s7860 Baghdad 96 68 pc 93 68 Beijing 64 53 sh 61 52 Berlin 61 53 c6352Bogota6849r6649 BuenosAires 67 54 s6954 Cairo 85 66 s8466Caracas9077sh9077 Copenhagen 59 52 sh 58 54 Dublin 57 46 c5543Frankfurt5948sh6247 Geneva 56 49 r6246 Havana 88 70 t8972HongKong9182s9181 Istanbul 68 58 pc 68 57 Jerusalem 76 64 s7561 Jo’burg 70 51 pc 73 56Lisbon7159pc7760 London 61 51 c5750 Madrid 69 47 pc 73 51Manila9081t8879 Montreal 61 51 c6448 Moscow 51 41 c5038Nairobi8057pc8255 Ottawa 60 50 c6348 Paris 64 52 pc 62 50 Prague 65 52 c6951 Rio 87 71 pc 73 70 Rome 80 66 r7563 Seoul 77 72 sh 77 66Singapore8877pc8678 Stockholm 58 50 r5751 Sydney 79 56 s7056Tokyo8070s7970 Toronto 62 55 sh 64 56 Vancouver 57 48 pc 56 46Vienna7558pc7655 Albany!AlbanyNY5851 r5953 Albuquerque 77 54 s7856Anchorage4439s4741 Asheville 73 61 t6761 Atlanta 76 67 t7167AtlanticCity8164t7661 Austin 90 56 pc 89 55 Baltimore 80 64 t7964 Billings 82 56 s8655Birmingham8066t7365 Boise 82 53 s8254 Boston 60 56 r6254Buffalo6859sh6959 BurlingtonVT 61 53 c6451 CharlestonSC 84 69 pc 82 71CharlestonWV7459t7961 Charlotte 80 67 t7968 Chicago 70 62 pc 70 61 Cincinnati 74 62 sh 78 64 Cleveland 72 61 sh 73 61 ColumbiaSC 84 68 t8269 ColumbusOH 74 61 sh 77 62Dallas8760s8761 Denver 80 49 s8050 DesMoines 76 58 s7559Detroit7361sh7258 Fargo 79 53 s8059 Guam 87 79 sh 86 77Hartford6154r6150 Honolulu 87 74 pc 88 75 Houston 88 62 pc 87 61 Indianapolis 74 62 sh 76 61 KansasCity 79 54 s7456 Knoxville 78 64 t7363 LasVegas 89 70 pc 82 63LittleRock8161pc7862 LosAngeles 86 62 pc 80 59 Louisville 78 63 t8066Memphis8064pc7964 Milwaukee 69 61 c6761 Minneapolis 73 54 s7558Mobile8067t7765 Nashville 78 62 t7764 NewOrleans 83 70 t8168 NewYorkCity 73 61 t6659 NorfolkVA 83 67 pc 80 67 Okla.City 82 53 s8151 Omaha 78 50 s7757Philadelphia8066t7664 Phoenix 97 72 pc 84 69 Pittsburgh 72 60 t7560PortlandME5950c6049 PortlandOR 70 52 pc 59 48 Providence 63 57 r6255RochesterNY6557sh6258 St.Louis 76 63 pc 76 62 St.ThomasVI 88 79 s8879 SaltLakeCity 82 57 s7959 SanAntonio 89 61 pc 90 62 SanDiego 80 66 pc 76 66 SanFrancisco 75 57 s6957SanJuanPR9180pc8980 Savannah 85 69 pc 84 71 Seattle 61 48 pc 56 46Spokane7048pc7045 Syracuse 66 57 r6258 Wash.DC 81 66 t7967 Howhotitwillfeel withtheforecast 60%humidityfactoredin:92° Daytona Beach 6:46a 7:10p 12:38a 12:57p 82NewSmyrnaBeach7:17a 7:37p 1:03a 1:16p 82CocoaBeach6:33a 6:58p 12:26a 12:36p 83MelbourneBeach6:42a 7:06p 12:36a 12:57p 83SebastianInlet6:47a 7:11p 12:38a 12:59p 82 St.Augustine -JupiterInlet E6-123-5 ModerateJupiterInlet-Key Largo ENE 6-12 1-3 LightKeyLargo-DryTortugas E7-142-4 LightCapeSable-Tarpon Springs E4-8 1-2LightTarponSprings-Apalachicola ESE4-8 1-2 Light Sunrise 7:20 a.m. Sunset 7:08p.m. Moonrise 5:16a.m. Moonset 6:22 p.m. Full Oct.20 Firstqtr Oct.12 New Oct.6 Lastqtr Oct.28 Mainpollen:Mold Forecastsand graphicsprovided byAccuWeather,Inc.©2021 High yesterday 90 Lowyesterday 73 Avg.for Oct.3 88/70 Record high yest.96 in 1923 Record lowyest.54 in 1920 UV index:3 24-hourtotal Trace Monthtodate 0.18” Normal month to date0.49” October record 19.10”in 1915 Year to date 36.88” Relationtonormal -7.33” Skies:s-sunny,pc-partlycloudy,c-cloudy,sh-showers,t-thunderstorms,r-rain,sf-snowflurries,sn-snow,i-ice. Scan this QRcode withyourcell phonetoseethelatesthourlyforecast 12 Orlando Sentinel | Section 1 | Monday, October 4, 2021 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGCITYOFWINTERSPRINGS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE PLANNING &ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY AND CITY COMMISSION PROPOSE TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING: ORDINANCE 2021-08 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS,SEMINOLE COUNTY,FLORIDA,SETTING FORTH AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN,RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT BASED ON THE CITY’S EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PURSUANT TO SECTION 163.3191,FLORIDA STATUTES;PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF PRIOR INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS;INCORPORATION INTO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; LEGAL STATUS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS; SEVERABILITY;AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. PLANNING &ZONING BOARD /LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD ON THURSDAY,OCTOBER 14,2021 AT 5:30 P.M.OR SOON THEREAFTER IN THE COMMISSION CHAMBERS LOCATED AT WINTER SPRINGS CITY HALL 1126 EAST STATEROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS,FLORIDA CITY COMMISSION FIRST READING PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD ON MONDAY,NOVEMBER 8,2021 AT 6:30 P.M.OR SOON THEREAFTER IN THE COMMISSION CHAMBERS LOCATED AT WINTER SPRINGS CITY HALL 1126 EAST STATEROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS,FLORIDA THE CITY COMMISSION RESERVES THE RIGHT TO POSTPONE OR CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS ORDINANCE AT THIS MEETING WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE. The proposed ordinance may be obtained by interested parties between 8a.m.and 5p.m.,Monday through Friday,fromthe office of the City Clerk, located at 1126 E.SR 434,Winter Springs,Florida.For moreinformation, call (407)327-1800 #237.Persons with disabilities needing assistance to participate in any of these proceedings should contact the Employee Relations Department Coordinator,48hours in advance of the meeting at (407)327-1800,#236.This is apublic hearing.Interested parties are advised that they may appear at the meeting and be heardwith respect to the proposed ordinance.If you decide to appeal any recommendation or decision made by the City Commission with respect to any matter considered at this meeting,you will need arecordofthe proceedings,and for such purposes,you may need to ensurethat averbatim recordofthe proceedings is made upon which the appeal is based. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGCITYOFWINTERSPRINGS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THATTHEPLANNING&ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY AND CITY COMMISSIONPROPOSETOCONSIDERTHEFOLLOWING: ORDINANCE 2021-07 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS,SEMINOLE COUNTY,FLORIDA,SETTING FORTH AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVEPLAN,CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT BASED ON THE CITY’S EVALUATION AND APPRAISALOFTHECOMPREHENSIVEPLANPURSUANTTO SECTION 163.3191,FLORIDA STATUTES;PROVIDINGFORTHEREPEALOFPRIORINCONSISTENT ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS;INCORPORATIONINTOTHECOMPREHENSIVEPLAN;LEGAL STATUS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS;SEVERABILITY;AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. PLANNING &ZONING BOARD /LOCAL PLANNING AGENCYPUBLICHEARING WILL BE HELD ON THURSDAY,OCTOBER 14,2021 AT 5:30 P.M.OR SOON THEREAFTER IN THE COMMISSION CHAMBERS LOCATED AT WINTER SPRINGS CITY HALL 1126 EAST STATEROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS,FLORIDA CITY COMMISSION FIRST READING PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD ON MONDAY,NOVEMBER 8,2021 AT 6:30 P.M.OR SOON THEREAFTER IN THE COMMISSION CHAMBERS LOCATED AT WINTER SPRINGS CITY HALL 1126 EAST STATEROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS,FLORIDA THE CITY COMMISSION RESERVES THE RIGHT TO POSTPONE OR CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS ORDINANCE AT THIS MEETING WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE. The proposed ordinance may be obtained by interested parties between 8a.m.and 5p.m.,Monday through Friday,fromthe office of the City Clerk,located at 1126 E.SR 434,Winter Springs,Florida.For moreinformation,call (407)327-1800 #237.Persons with disabilities needing assistance to participate in any of these proceedings should contact the Employee Relations Department Coordinator,48hours in advance of the meeting at (407)327-1800,#236.This is apublic hearing.Interested parties areadvised that they may appear at the meeting and be heardwith respect to the proposed ordinance.If you decide to appeal any recommendation or decision made by the City Commission with respect to any matter considered at this meeting, you will need arecordofthe proceedings,and for such purposes, you may need to ensurethataverbatim recordofthe proceedings is made upon which the appeal is based. 81 PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM 401 CITY COMMISSION AGENDA | NOVEMBER 8, 2021 REGULAR MEETING TITLE The Community Development Department, Planning Division requests that the City Commission hold a Public Hearing to consider Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) based amendments to the Comprehensive Plan (Ordinance 2021-07), amending the Comprehensive Plan related to the Capital Improvements Element. SUMMARY After June 2, 2011, local governments have had more discretion in determining whether they need to update their local comprehensive plan. As such, local governments no longer need to submit evaluation and appraisal reports to the department for a sufficiency determination. Instead, local governments must, at least every seven years, pursuant to Rule Chapter 73C- 49, Florida Administrative Code, determine whether the need exists to amend the Comprehensive Plan to reflect changes in State requirements since the last time the Comprehensive Plan was updated. The evaluation and appraisal should address changes in state requirements since the last update of the comprehensive plan and update the plan based on changes to local conditions. The attached documents include EAR based Comprehensive Plan amendments, specifically to the Capital Improvements Element. Subsequent EAR based amendments to other Comprehensive Plan Elements will follow in the next few months during upcoming public hearings. The revised language will allow the Element to come into full compliance with the Evaluation and Appraisal Report that was due in 2017. On October 14, 2021 the Local Planning Agency unanimously recommended approval of the Element to the City Commission. Applicable Law And Public Policy Constitution of the State of Florida Article VIII Section 2(b) Municipalities 82 Florida Statute 163.3194 Legal Status of Comprehensive Plan Florida Statute 163.3201 Relationship of Comprehensive Plan in exercise of Land Development Regulatory Authority Florida Statute 166.041 Procedures for adoption of ordinances and resolutions. Winter Springs Charter Section 4.15 Ordinances in General. Winter Springs Chapter 15. Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan Fiscal Impact The amendment is not expected to have any fiscal impact. Proposed Timeline October 4, 2021 Advertisement runs in Orlando Sentinel (10 days prior to LPA) October 14, 2021 Local Planning Agency/Planning & Zoning Board November 8, 2021 City Commission - 1st Reading/Transmittal November 29, 2021 Transmit to Department of Economic Opportunity December 1, 2021 Department of Economic Opportunity Receipt Confirmation December 20, 2021 Adoption Ad runs in Orlando Sentinel (5 days prior to City Commission) January 10, 2022 City Commission – 2nd Reading/Adoption January 24, 2022 Adopted Plan Amendment Submittal to State January 31, 2022 Department of Economic Opportunity (45 day compliancy review) March 17, 2022 Effective Date (no petitions filed) RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Commission hold a Public Hearing and Approve First Reading/Transmittal Hearing of Ordinance 2021-07, amending the Capital Improvements Element of the Comprehensive Plan. 83 CAPITAL IMROVEMENTS ELEMENT CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN i TABLE OF CONTENTS A. GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES ................................................................................ 2 B. SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 12 LIST OF TABLES Table IX – 1: City of Winter Springs Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements (SCI) FY 2013/14 - 2017/18 2022/26 .................................................................................................... 11 Table IX – 2: Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements (SCI) FY 2013/14 - 2017/18 2022/26 by Fund ....................................................................................................................14 EXHIBIT A 84 CAPITAL IMROVEMENTS ELEMENT CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IX - 2 CHAPTER IX CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT A. GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES GOAL 1: Provide public facilities and services which protect and promote the public health, safety and general welfare of Winter Springs’ residents in a sustainable manner and which support mobility strategies, while accommodating desired future growth and redevelopment at acceptable Levels of Service. (Ord. 2010-18; 10-25-10) Objective 1.1: Annual Review. The City shall annually review and modify its Capital Improvements Element to ensure the financial feasibility and timely provision of capital facilities needed to maintain Level of Service (LOS) standards and to guide the City’s capital and operating expenditures on mobility toward achieving the stated goal of mobility and reduction of the City’s level of greenhouse gases emissions. (Ord. 2010-18; 10-25-10) Policy 1.1.1: Identify capital projects needed to meet existing deficiencies, to accommodate desired future growth and to replace obsolete or worn- out facilities in a five-year Schedule of Capital Improvements (SCI) (Table IX-1). The SCI shall identify funding sources and shall be reviewed and updated annually in order to maintain a continual five- year priority and outline of capital projects planned for implementation. Policy 1.1.2: Include the first year of the SCI in the capital budget as part of the annual budgeting process, along with any other capital improvements that are identified in the City’s Capital Improvements Program. Policy 1.1.3: Define capital projects as those projects identified within the other elements of the Comprehensive Plan that are necessary to meet established LOS and to support mobility strategies, increase the capacity or efficiency of existing infrastructure, replace failing infrastructure or enhance facilities and infrastructure that generally have a cost exceeding $50,000. (Ord. 2010-18; 10-25-10) Policy 1.1.4: Include and fund capital projects for the following facilities and infrastructure in the SCI: Transportation (Mobility Strategies) (Ord. 2010-18; 10-25-10) Stormwater Management (Drainage) Sanitary Sewer Solid Waste Potable Water Parks and Recreation Policy 1.1.5: Update the SCI to maintain consistency with the Water Supply Work Plan (Exhibit IV-B-1). Policy 1.1.6: Update the SCI on an annual basis, or eliminate, defer, or delay the construction for any facility listed in the five-year SCI by ordinance without an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. Transmit a copy of the ordinance to the 85 CAPITAL IMROVEMENTS ELEMENT CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IX - 3 Florida Department of Economic Opportunity following Commission approval. (Ord. 2012-14) Policy 1.1.7: Allow corrections and modifications of costs and revenue sources in the SCI to be made by ordinance, in addition to annual updates, without an amendment to the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Transmit a copy of the ordinance to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity following Commission approval. (Ord. 2012-14) Policy 1.1.8: Adopt either a long-term concurrency management system and/or other planning strategy to address long-term LOS deficiencies. (Ord. 2012-14) Policy 1.1.9: Consider capital projects for school capacity improvements included in the most recently approved Seminole County School Board’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan. (Ord. 2010-18; 10-25-10; Ord. 2012-14) Objective 1.2: Level of Service (LOS) and Mobility Strategies. The City shall utilize Level of Service (LOS) criteria and mobility strategies defined in the various elements of this Plan when determining the timing and funding of capital projects and to assist in determining a fair share that a development should contribute to the achievement of mobility strategies. The City must demonstrate that the LOS standards will be achieved and maintained by the end of the five-year planning period. A deficiency is a facility of service that does not meet (is operating below) the adopted Level of Service (LOS) standard. Within the citywide TCEA, mobility strategies as detailed in the Multimodal Transportation Element shall apply, which include Quality/Levels of Service (Q/LOS) for monitoring purposes. The City shall annually monitor evaluate whether conditions that trigger the need to alter Q/LOS standards (as identified in the Multimodal Transportation Element) have been achieved. If so, necessary improvements shall be included in capital or operating budgets and within the Capital Improvements Element. (Ord. 2010-18; 10-25- 10) Policy 1.2.1: Adopt LOS standards and mobility strategies for facilities and infrastructure as follows: a) Transportation (Mobility Strategies)- Within the citywide TCEA, mobility strategies and standards (as detailed in the Multimodal Transportation Element) shall apply. (Cross Reference: See Multimodal Transportation Element, Policy 1.1.1) (Ord. 2010-18; 10-25-10) b) Sanitary Sewer- 100 gallons per person per day. (Cross Reference: See Infrastructure Element, Policy 1.1.1.) c) Solid Waste- 3.7 pounds per person per day. (Cross Reference: See Infrastructure Element, Policy 3.1.1.) d) Potable Water- 115 gallons (minimum) per person per day. (Cross Reference: See Infrastructure Element, Policy 2.1.1.) e) Stormwater Management- (Cross Reference: See Infrastructure Element, Policy 4.1.1.) 1) Water Quantity - Peak post-development runoff rate shall not exceed peak pre-development runoff rate for the 25- year, 24-hour storm event. Each development shall accommodate its proportion of basin runoff rate above the downstream systems actual capacity. 86 CAPITAL IMROVEMENTS ELEMENT CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IX - 4 2) Water Quality - Stormwater treatment system which meets the requirements of the Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) and which is site-specific or serve sub-areas of the City. 3) Roadway construction - All public roadways within a development shall be designed and constructed to standards which do not allow any amount of water above the roadway centerline during the following storm events for the following roadway types: i. Local Roadway – 25-year, 24-hour design storm event (8.6 inches of rainfall). ii. Collector Roadway – 25-year, 24-hour design storm event (8.6 inches of rainfall). iii. Arterial Roadway – 100-year, 24-hour design storm event (10.6 inches of rainfall). f) Parks- 8 acres (total public park and recreation land acreage, including open space) per 1,000 residents. The City may utilize State and county park lands and trails that are located within the City’s jurisdictional boundaries. This standard includes both passive and active recreation lands. (Cross Reference: See Recreation and Open Space Element, Policy 1.1.1) City Owned Open Space- 4 acres per 1,000 residents. Open space is defined as “undeveloped lands suitable for passive recreation or conservation”. (Cross Reference: See Recreation and Open Space Element, Policy 1.1.1) g) School Capacity- as established by the Seminole County School Board- 100% of the aggregate permanent Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) capacity for each school type within each Concurrency Service Area, except for high schools which are established at 110% of the current aggregate permanent FISH capacity for 2008-2012 in order to financially achieve the desired LOS. (Cross Reference: See Public School Facilities Element, Policy 1.1.1.) Policy 1.2.2: Evaluate proposed land use amendments to determine the compatibility of those amendments with the adopted LOS standards, mobility strategies, and with available funding for implementing improvements that would be necessary pursuant to such land use amendments. (Ord. 2010-18; 10-25-10) Policy 1.2.3: Consider the following thresholds to target initiation and budgeting of construction and/or purchase of capital facilities to meet projected future needs based on adopted LOS standards: (Ord. 2010-18; 10-25-10) Sewer – 7580 % of available capacity is being utilized. Water – 7580 % of available capacity is being utilized. Stormwater – Adoption of Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) 87 CAPITAL IMROVEMENTS ELEMENT CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IX - 5 Master Plan. Recreation and Open Space – Park lands when 95 % of available land area is utilized or when 90 % of the population exists in areas in need of new park acreage. Policy 1.2.4: Maintain records which allow for an annual evaluation of the City’s mobility strategies. Information is to include the acreage of development/redevelopment by land use, density, and FAR; the percentage of mixed use; and an updated inventory of bicycle, pedestrian and transit facilities and reduction in sidewalk gaps between facilities. In addition, the City shall monitor its connectivity index by TCEA Zone to ascertain any increase realized. Other site planning performance criteria may also be included as part of the TCEA evaluation such as, building placement, parking location and number of spaces, connection to adjacent properties, and proximity to transit stops/shelters. Performance Measures and Targets may be subject to further consideration if they cannot be supported by reasonably available data or additional measures are identified that may also be appropriate. (Cross Reference: See Multimodal Transportation Element, Policy 1.11.9) (Ord. 2010-18; 10-25-10) Objective 1.3: Capital Improvement Evaluation. Capital projects shall be evaluated to determine if they meet the prioritization criteria and consistency with adopted Level of Service (LOS) standards and/or public need. Policy 1.3.1: Direct the Community Development Department–Planning Division to oversee the coordination of the Capital Improvements Element annual update. Consider the annual update as a 10-month process that is required to ensure that necessary facilities and infrastructure to meet LOS standards are incorporated into the budgeting process. Policy 1.3.2: Require Capital Project Request Forms to be prepared by the Community Development Department–Planning Division and distributed to City departments prior to the budget workshop each year. (Ord. 2012-14) Policy 1.3.3: Require project requests to be prepared with a description of how the project achieves or maintains LOS or how it will implement the Comprehensive Plan. Include a detailed cost analysis, with estimated costs for design, construction, land acquisition, and annual operating and maintenance costs. Policy 1.3.4: Prioritize project requests for capital projects according to the following criteria: Whether the project eliminates a public hazard; Whether the project is necessary to meet established LOS; Whether the project increases the efficiency of existing facilities or infrastructure; Whether the project represents a logical extension of facilities within the urban service area to accommodate desired future growth; 88 CAPITAL IMROVEMENTS ELEMENT CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IX - 6 Whether the project implements the policies of the Comprehensive Plan as they pertain to concurrency requirements; Whether the project contributes to the completion of one or more of the goals identified in the City’s most recently adopted Strategic Plan; (Ord. 2012-14) Whether the project is coordinated with major projects of other agencies; and Whether the project is mandated by the State or Federal government. Policy 1.3.5: Require project requests to be evaluated by the Finance Department to determine each project’s impact on the City budget and the financial feasibility of the project. Evaluate each project’s funding options, the effect of the improvement on future revenues, and the effect of the improvement on operation and maintenance costs. Policy 1.3.6: Require the Community Development Department to evaluate the timing, location, and service area for each project request and determine the project’s consistency with the Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan. Policy 1.3.7: Include key staff in an internal Capital Improvements Element coordination workshop, as part of the annual budget review process, to discuss project requests and staff’s findings. (Ord. 2012-14) Policy 1.3.8: Compile the resulting information into a draft Capital Improvements Program which shall be presented to the Local Planning Agency for review and recommendation prior to being presented to the City Commission. (Ord. 2012-14) Objective 1.4: New Development to Bear a Proportionate Cost. New development shall bear a proportionate cost of public facility improvements in order to maintain adopted level of service (LOS) standards and mobility strategies. (Ord. 2010-18; 10-25-10) Policy 1.4.1: Evaluate all development order applications as to the impact of the development on capital facilities and the operation and maintenance of those facilities. The evaluation shall include, but not be limited to, the following: Expected capital costs, including the installation of new facilities required that are related to the development. Expected operation and maintenance costs associated with the new facilities required by the development. Anticipated revenues the development will contribute, including impact fees, user fees, and future taxes. Policy 1.4.2: Guarantee the timely installation of capital improvements required to meet LOS and mobility strategies which are to be funded by a developer, in an enforceable development agreement, interlocal agreement, or other enforceable agreement. Execute such agreements 89 CAPITAL IMROVEMENTS ELEMENT CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IX - 7 under the City's constitutional home rule power as authorized in Chapter 166, Florida Statutes or as otherwise authorized by law. (Ord. 2010-18; 10-25-10) Policy 1.4.3: Require a development agreement and/or development to proceed in more than one phase, when appropriate, to ensure that LOS standards are maintained and mobility strategies implemented. (Ord. 2010-18; 10- 25-10) Policy 1.4.4: Continue to use impact fees to assess new development a pro rata share of the costs required to expand or acquire capital facilities or equipment made necessary by the new construction from which the fees were collected or for principal payments on debt instruments for these facilities and services. Policy 1.4.5: Require new developments to be responsible for installing all internal potable and reclaimed water and sewer systems, vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation systems, and internal recreation/open space facilities within their development. Connecting internal systems to designated major potable and reclaimed water and sewer trunk systems and vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation network is the financial responsibility of the developer. (Cross Reference: See Multi- Modal Transportation Element, Policies 1.5.3; 1.5.4; and 1.5.13) (Ord. 2010-18; 10-25-10) Objective 1.5: Funding Sources. The City shall pursue adequate funding of capital projects identified in the Schedule of Capital Improvements (SCI). The School District retains the responsibility for financing and constructing school facilities. Policy 1.5.1: Demonstrate that funds for the Capital Improvements Element are either funded or unfunded. Consider committed revenue sources as: ad valorem taxes, approved bonds, secured grants, state and federal funds, tax revenue, impact fees, service charges and developer contributions (included within an enforceable development agreement). (Ord. 2012- 14) Policy 1.5.2: Allow planned revenue sources to include the City’s intent to increase the level or amount of a revenue source, which is contingent on ratification by public referendum. Amend the Capital Improvements Element if the referendum fails, to include policies which identify alternative funding sources or take other actions as needed to make the SCI financially feasibility while meeting concurrency. Policy 1.5.3: Include projects which are relied upon to satisfy LOS standards even when funded by sources outside the City. Include those funds as the revenue source within the SCI. Policy 1.5.4: Any funding for capital improvement projects provided by a developer shall be guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement or interlocal agreement or other enforceable agreement. Reflect the agreement in the SCI as the revenue source, if the capital improvement is necessary to serve the development within the 5-year period. (Ord. 2012-14) Policy 1.5.5: Consider the following criteria in selecting sources to finance public 90 CAPITAL IMROVEMENTS ELEMENT CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IX - 8 facilities: Utilize to the extent possible, the following sources (listed in order of priority and preference) to finance public facilities: Grants or other intergovernmental sources Developer contributions (inclusive of dedicated land and impact fees) User revenues (inclusive of charges for services, local option gas tax, etc.) Sales tax (local option infrastructure surtax) Proceeds of Debt Instruments Ad valorem property taxes Policy 1.5.6: Continue to participate in METROPLAN ORLANDO to ensure funding distribution for transportation projects and mobility strategies identified in the SCI. (Ord. 2010-18; 10-25-10) Policy 1.5.7: Apply state revenue sharing motor fuels tax funds for traffic related maintenance and capital improvement projects. Policy 1.5.8: Reserve the net proceeds of the Seminole County Local Option Gasoline Tax (LGTX) specifically for traffic related maintenance and capital improvement projects, after payment of existing bond obligations. Policy 1.5.9: Reserve total proceeds from the Seminole County Local Option Sales Tax (1CTX) for transportation related capital projects. Policy 1.5.10: Reserve funds collected from Impact Fees for growth related capital outlays. Reserve proceeds from the Stormwater Utility Fund (SUF) for stormwater management operating needs and capital projects. Maintain a reserve account restricted for sanitary sewer related capital projects. Policy 1.5.11: Reserve a portion of funds collected from the Utility Enterprise Fund (UEF) to complete sanitary sewer and potable water capital projects. Policy 1.5.12: Continue to contain provisions for all new developments to provide parks and recreation lands and/or facilities and/or fees-in-lieu-of as specified in the Recreation and Open Space Element. Objective 1.6: Debt Management. The City shall manage debt issuance and obligations according to sound public fiscal management principles so that the City is able to provide needed capital improvements and maintain services at adopted levels of service (LOS). Policy 1.6.1: Consider the following as criteria for managing debt financing: The City does not have legal debt limits or utilize specific debt ratios such as the limitation on the use of revenue bonds as a percent of total debt; the maximum ratio of total debt service to total revenue; and the maximum ratio of outstanding capital indebtedness to property tax base. Instead each debt issuance is evaluated on an individual basis 91 CAPITAL IMROVEMENTS ELEMENT CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IX - 9 giving consideration to the following factors: Type of facility being financed; Significance of the annual debt service requirement; Favorable impact to the City; Economic capacity of the City; Overlapping debt which depends on the same economic base; and Projected City growth rate. Policy 1.6.2: Manage debt with the goal of maintaining or enhancing the City’s credit rating so as to lower total borrowing costs. Policy 1.6.3: Do not utilize long-term debt to fund current and ongoing operations; Allow the use of short-term debt to allow the City to meet its cash flow requirements or to provide increased flexibility in financing programs; Allow debt to be issued for renovations, updates, modernizations and rehabilitations provided the expenditures extend the useful life of the capital asset; Require capital financed through the use of long-term debt to be financed for a period not to exceed the expected useful life of the asset. Policy 1.6.4: Utilize external bond counsel for all debt issues and competitively bid all bonds issued by the City unless the City approves a negotiated sale. Policy 1.6.5: Evaluate the use of revenue bonds as a debt instrument, based on the following criteria: A five (5) year projection of committed and/or planned revenues related to the capital project being financed shall be prepared and updated annually as a part of the SCI update. On an annual basis, the City will restrict, for enterprise operations, the amount of cash as required by bond covenants for the purpose of ensuring adequate repair and/or replacement of capital facilities. Policy 1.6.6: Evaluate the use of tax revenues as a pledge for the repayment of debt, based on the following criteria: A five (5) year projection of committed and/or planned revenues related to the capital project being financed shall be prepared and updated annually as a part of the SCI update. The City may use long term capital lease payments on lease purchases for capital projects identified within this element, provided adequate debt service requirements are provided. 92 CAPITAL IMROVEMENTS ELEMENT CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IX - 10 Policy 1.6.7: The impact of principal and interest revenue bond payments on the operation and maintenance of the affected utility and/or department will not require deferring current maintenance of existing infrastructure. Policy 1.6.8: Budget cash restricted due to bond and grant covenants in accordance with the terms of the covenants. Policy 1.6.9: Competitively bid investment of escrow funds for advance refunding if it is expected that bids will result in a lower cost and the required securities are available in the market. Objective 1.7: Concurrency Management. The City shall continue to operate a Concurrency Management System for the review of all proposed developments within the City. As part of the City’s Concurrency Management System, the City will help facilitate school concurrency review by the School Board and shall rely upon the School Board to determine and report to the City if school capacity is available. The concurrency evaluation system shall measure the potential impact of any proposal for a development permit or order upon the City’s multimodal transportation network and the established minimum acceptable levels of service (LOS) for public schools, sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, potable water, and parks and recreation facilities, unless the development permit or order is exempt from the review requirements of this section. No development permit or order which contains a specific plan of development, including densities and intensities of development, shall be issued unless adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposed development as determined by the concurrency evaluation set forth in this section. (Ord. 2010-18; 10-25-10) Policy 1.7.1: Facilities Inventory and Reporting. Maintain an inventory of the bicycle and pedestrian facility network, and the available capacity of roads, potable water, and sanitary sewer facilities for purposes of concurrency management and mobility evaluation. The City shall coordinate with LYNX to determine the operating LOS for transit within the City as a part of its LOS monitoring. (Ord. 2010-18; 10-25-10) Policy 1.7.2: Maintain an inventory of public parks and acreage within the City’s Geographic Information Systems mapping software, for purposes of evaluating concurrency. Policy 1.7.3: Require the Community Development Department- Planning Division in conjunction with the Public Works/Utility Department and Parks and Recreation Department to evaluate and report on current capacity within each public facility category, including any encumbrances or deficiencies as part of the annual update to the Capital Improvements Element. Identify any public facilities that will require improvements to maintain adopted LOS. Policy 1.7.4: Require the Utility Department to maintain data on current water supply demand and permitted capacity and supply this data to the Planning Division on an as-needed basis for evaluation of proposed future land use map amendments. (Cross Reference: See Future Land Use Element, Policy 1.3.4.) Policy 1.7.5: Withhold a development order unless it can be determined that adequate water supplies and associated public facilities and services are available. Consider public facility and service availability as sufficient if the public facilities and services for a development are 93 CAPITAL IMROVEMENTS ELEMENT CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IX - 11 phased, or the development is phased so that the public facilities and those related services which are deemed necessary by the City to operate the facilities necessitated by the development are available concurrent with the impacts of that development. (Cross Reference: See Future Land Use Element Policy 1.3.4.) Policy 1.7.6: Withhold the approval of any site plan, final subdivision or functional equivalent which includes new residential units not exempted by the 2007 current Seminole County School Board Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and School Concurrency As Amended January 2008 until the School Board has reported that there is school capacity available or a mitigation agreement has been reached. (Cross Reference: See Public School Facility Element, Policy 1.2.1 and Intergovernmental Coordination Element,Policy 1.2.9) 94 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT IX - 12 Table IX – 1: City of Winter Springs Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements (SCI) FY 2013/14 – 2017/18 2021/22 – 2025/26 Project Name LOS Purpose Funding Source Description / Justification Location Ranking Score Year 1 2021/2022 Year 2 2022/2023 Year 3 2023/2024 Year 4 2024/2025 Year 5 2025/2026 TOTALS (Years 1-5) Comprehensive Plan Reference LOS: PARKS & RECREATION Lake Jessup Overlook FUTURE CF301/CF302/CF303 Expansion consistent with recreational needs of residents to include but not limited to, pickleball facility, meeting space, additional parking and Event Center. CWP 5 3,058,500$ 3,058,500$ ROS 1.1.11, FLUE 1.3.3; ROS 1.5; Torcaso Park FUTURE PIMF/CF 303 Torcaso Park expansion consistent with recreational needs of residents, including new pavilion, pier, and updated sidewalks Torcaso Park 5 $ 450,000 450,000$ ROS 1.4; ROS 1.4.1; FLUE 1.3.3; HE 2.2.11; CIE 1.1.3 Trotwood Park REPLCMT CF-303 Pond and Landscape renovations Trotwood Park 8 $ 50,000 50,000$ ROS 1.4; ROS 1.4.1; CIE 1.1.3 Land Acquisition FUTURE 1CTX TBD land acquisition for multi use trail projects TBD 8 $ 555,969 555,969$ ROS 1.1.10, FLUE 1.3.3; ROS 1.5; TOTAL EXPENSE 3,558,500$ -$ 555,969$ -$ -$ 4,114,469$ TOTAL REVENUE 500,000$ -$ 500,000$ -$ -$ 1,000,000$ Project Name LOS Purpose Funding Source Description/ Justification Location Ranking Score Year 1 2021/2022 Year 2 2022/2023 Year 3 2023/2024 Year 4 2024/2025 Year 5 2025/2026 TOTALS (Years 1-5) Comprehensive Plan Reference LOS: POTABLE WATER WTP #3 Electrical Upgrades REPLCMT UEF Water Treatment Plant #3 standy by power connection upgrades WTP #3 2 400,000$ 400,000$ CIE 1.1.3; IE IV.C.3, FLUE 1.3.1 WTP #2 & WTP #3 Storage Tank REPLCMT UEF Water Treatment Plant #2 and Water Treatment Plant #3 storage tank rehab WTP #2 & WTP #3 5 100,000$ 100,000$ IE IV.C.7, FLUE 1.3.1 Water Line Restoration REPLCMT UEF Annual reline portions of systems City Wide 3 250,000$ 1,158,000$ 704,000$ 704,000$ 704,000$ 3,520,000$ IE.IV.C.5, FLUE 1.3.1; HE 1.12 WTP#1 Esthetics EXISTING UEF Water Treatment Plant 1 project to reduce taste and odor caused by hydrogen sulfide in the wells WTP #1 2 250,000$ 250,000$ IE IV.C.7, FLUE 1.3.1 WTP#1 Header Replacement REPLCMT UEF WTP #1 design and chemical feed header replacement WTP#1 2 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ IE IV.C.4; FLUE 1.3.1 TOTAL EXPENSE 1,900,000$ 1,258,000$ 704,000$ 704,000$ 704,000$ 5,270,000$ TOTAL REVENUE 3,900,000$ 3,997,500$ 4,097,438$ 4,199,873$ 4,304,870$ 20,499,681$ 95 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT IX - 13 Project Name LOS Purpose Funding Source Description / Justification Location Ranking Score Current Yr Year 1 2016/2017 Year 2 2017/2018 Year 3 2018/2019 Year 4 2019/2020 Year 5 2020/2021 TOTALS (Years 1-5) Comprehensive Plan Reference NOTES LOS: PARKS & RECREATION Magnolia Park Amphitheater FUTURE CF-305 & 1CTX Outdoor amphitheatre furthers the network of public green spaces that form the framework for the Town Center and promotes & expands trail system; Improves recreational opportunities consistent with the recreational needs of residents; Is a catalyst for private development in the Town Center; Accomodates growth through additional active recreational area [LOS]. Winter Springs Town Center $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - ROS- 1.1.1; ROS-1.4; ROS- 1.5.2; FLUE- 1.3.1; FLUE-2.1.5; FLUE- 2.2.3; CIE- 1.3.1 per meeting on 7/19 this line should be moved to PW Trotwood Park N/A GNF Family picnic pavilion Trotwood Park $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - ROS 1.4; ROS 1.4.1; ROS 1.5; FLUE 1.3.3 Central Winds Park N/A GNF, GRT & PIMF Concrete ampitheatre stage for special events on the west side of the Central Winds Park. A trailhead with restrooms facilities. Design services. Central Winds Park $ - $ 225,000 $ 75,000 $ 300,000 ROS 1.4; ROS 1.4.1; ROS 1.5; FLUE 1.3.3 Outdoor Fitness Course N/A PIMF Outdoor fitness equipment in the parks.TBD $ - $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ 75,000 ROS 1.3.6; ROS 1.4; ROS 1.4.1; ROS 1.5 Torcaso Park N/A GRT & PIMF Torcaso Park expansion consistent with recreational needs of residents to include but not limited to: family pavilioon, field house with gynmasium, new play ground, basketball courts, and splash pad improvements. Additional parking. Utilizes grant funding. Torcaso Park $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 600,000 ROS 1.4; ROS 1.4.1; FLUE 1.3.3; HE 2.2.11; CIE 1.1.3 Central Winds Roadway Project N/A GRT & PIMF Replacement & renovation or existing perimeter park security fencing consistent with recreational needs of residents; Utilizes grant funding.Central Winds Park $ - $ 100,000 $ 50,000 $ 150,000 per meeting on 7/19 this line should be moved to PW Park Playgrounds N/A GRT & PIMF Replacement & renovation or existing playgrounds equipment consistent with recreational needs of residents; Utilizes grant funding. Torcaso Park, Sam Smith Park, Central Winds Park $ 130,000 $ 100,000 $ 130,000 $ 360,000 Total 330,000$ 800,000$ 425,000$ -$ 130,000$ 1,485,000$ Project Name LOS Purpose Funding Source Description / Justification Location Ranking Score Current Yr Year 1 2016/2017 Year 2 2017/2018 Year 3 2018/2019 Year 4 2019/2020 Year 5 2020/2021 TOTALS (Years 1-5) Comprehensive Plan Reference LOS: POTABLE WATER Dunmar Water Line Interconnect FUTURE UEF Water Distribution System Loop thru Dunmar Estates Water Distribution System 6 60,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ CIE 1.6.1; IE IV.B.2; IE IV.B.2.1 WTP#1 Treatment Improvements FUTURE UEF Process Control Improvements to meet new Federal water quality standards WTP #1 6 3,000,000$ 3,000,000$ -$ -$ CIE 1.6.1; IE IV.B.2; IE IV.B.2.1 Administration Building at Public Works Compound FUTURE 311 Construct Admin Building at Public Works Compound to Centralize Management Team and eliminate Rental Trailer Public Works Compound 6 650,000$ 50,000$ -$ -$ -$ IE IV.B.3.2; FLUE 1.3.1; Total 3,110,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 96 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT IX - 14 Project Name LOS Purpose Funding Source Description/ Justification Location Ranking Score Year 1 2021/2022 Year 2 2022/2023 Year 3 2023/2024 Year 4 2024/2025 Year 5 2025/2026 TOTALS (Years 1-5) Comprehensive Plan Reference LOS: RECLAIMED WATER Reclaim Expansion REPLCMT UEF / GRT Reclaimed Expansion (ie Tuskawilla Crossing)City Wide 3 2,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 6,000,000$ IE IV.B.B.1.d.5; CIE 1.1.3 Plant Rehab REPLCMT UEF Lake Jessup Reclaim Water Augmentation Plant Rehab Reclaim Plant 3 250,000$ 250,000$ IE IV.B.B.1.d.5; CIE 1.1.3 TOTAL EXPENSE 2,250,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 6,250,000$ TOTAL REVENUE 435,000$ 445,875$ 457,022$ 468,447$ 480,159$ 2,286,503$ Project Name LOS Purpose Funding Source Description/ Justification Location Ranking Score Year 1 2021/2022 Year 2 2022/2023 Year 3 2023/2024 Year 4 2024/2025 Year 5 2025/2026 TOTALS (Years 1-5) Comprehensive Plan Reference LOS: SANITARY SEWER Sewer Line Restoration REPLCMT UEF Annual reline of portions of system.City Wide 3 250,000$ 1,334,000$ 792,000$ 792,000$ 792,000$ 3,960,000$ FLUE 1.3.1; CIE 1.3.3; IE IV.B.B.1; HE 1.12 Bypass Pump Replacement REPLCMT UEF Bybass Pumps at Lift Stations (50)City Wide 3 400,000$ 400,000$ 400,000$ 400,000$ 400,000$ 2,000,000$ IE IV.B.B.1.d.3; CIE 1.6.1; FLUE 1.3.1 Lift Station #7 Upgrades REPLCMT UEF Major maintenance to master pump station.Lift Station #7 - S. Edgemon Avenue 4 150,000$ 2,200,000$ 2,350,000$ IE IV.B.B.1.d.3; CIE 1.6.1; FLUE 1.3.1 Lift Station 1E Upgrades REPLCMT UEF Major maintenance to master pump station.Lift Station 1E 4 100,000$ 100,000$ IE IV.B.B.1.d.3; FLUE 1.3.1 Waste Water Plant Updgrades REPLCMT UEF Emergency Plant Upgrades, continued rehab to plants until replacement necessary.WWTP #1 & WWTP #2 1 1,777,000$ 1,777,000$ IE IV.B.B.1.d.1-2; FLUE 1.3.1 Replacement of WWTP REPLCMT ARPA/BND Replacement of Waste Water Treatment Plant that is at end of useful life TBD 1 2,500,000$ 25,000,000$ 27,500,000$ IE IV.B.B.1.d.1-2; FLUE 1.3.1; Replacement of WWTP REPLCMT GRT/BND Replacement of Waste Water Treatment Plant that is at end of useful life TBD 1 1,700,000$ 25,000,000 26,700,000$ IE IV.B.B.1.d.1-2; FLUE 1.3.1; TOTAL EXPENSE 5,177,000$ 5,634,000$ 26,192,000$ 1,192,000$ 26,192,000$ 64,387,000$ TOTAL REVENUE 14,640,000$ 14,806,000$ 6,976,150$ 7,150,554$ 7,329,318$ 50,902,021$ 97 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT IX - 15 Project Name LOS Purpose Funding Source Description/ Justification Location Ranking Score Year 1 2021/2022 Year 2 2022/2023 Year 3 2023/2024 Year 4 2024/2025 Year 5 2025/2026 TOTALS (Years 1-5) Comprehensive Plan Reference LOS: STORMWATER Culvert Upsizing EXISTING SUF Shore Rd and Alton Culvert Upsizing Shore Rd. / Alton 2 76,000$ 550,000$ 626,000.00$ IE IV E.B.3; CIE 1.1.3 Land FUTURE SUF Local Conveyance Holiday Ln, Sailfish & Lido Rd. Holiday Ln. / Lido Rd 9 42,000$ 360,000$ 402,000.00$ IE IV .E.B.1; CIE 1.1.8 Facilities FUTURE SUF Storage and Treatment Facility TBD 8 282,000$ 282,000.00$ IE IV .E.C.2; CIE 1.1.3 Bank Stabilization FUTURE SUF Shore and Bank Stabilization Murphy to Moss & Hacienda Village Murphy, Moss, & Hacienda Village 5 100,000$ 945,000$ 1,045,000.00$ IE IV .E.B.1 Bank Stabilization FUTURE SUF Shore and Alton Bank Stabilization Shore Rd/Alton 5 50,000$ 400,000$ 450,000.00$ IE IV .E.B.1 Stormwater Pipe Relining and Replacement REPLACE SUF Reline or Replace Failing Storm Piping City Wide 3 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 200,000.00$ CIE 1.1.3; FLUE 1.3.1; HE 1.1.9 TOTAL EXPENSE 176,000$ 1,100,000$ 1,037,000$ 692,000$ -$ 3,005,000$ TOTAL REVENUE 1,176,000$ 1,176,000$ 1,176,000$ 1,176,000$ 1,176,000$ 5,880,000$ 98 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT IX - 16 Project Name LOS Purpose Funding Source Description / Justification Location Ranking Score Year 1 2021/2022 Year 2 2022/2023 Year 3 2023/2024 Year 4 2024/2025 Year 5 2025/2026 TOTALS (Years 1-5) Comprehensive Plan Reference LOS: TRANSPORTATION Bridge Replacement REPLCMT 1CTX/LGTX Bridge Replacement / Long Term Maintenance Sheoah Blvd, Murphy Rd, Gee Creek, TBD Based on Priority 1 1,275,000$ 1,200,000$ 1,200,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 4,175,000$ CIE 1.1.3 TE 1 Resurfacing- REPLCMT 1CTX Major maintenance; Refurbishes existing streets so that transportation network is maintained.City Wide 2 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 5,000,000$ CIE 1.3.1; FLUE 1.3.1;TE 1 Traffic Calming EXISTING 1CTX Traffic Calming Upgrades City Wide 2 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 500,000$ HE 1.1.9; CIE 1.3.1; FLUE 1.3.1 Intersection Improvements at SR 434 and Michael Blake Blvd.FUTURE TIMF New traffic signal and related intersection improvements Town Center 3 500,000$ 500,000$ HE 1.1.9; CIE 1.3.1; FLUE 1.3.1 Intersection Improvements at SR 434 and Integra Entrance Road FUTURE TIMF New traffic signal and related intersection improvements SR 434 at Integra 360 Entrance 8 330,000$ 330,000$ HE 1.1.9; CIE 1.3.1; FLUE 1.3.1; TE 1 Town Center Sidewalk Improvements FUTURE LGTX New sidewalks in the Town Center District and Pedestrian Bridge Town Center 7 475,000$ 475,000$ TE 1; TE 1.2; CIE 1.3.1; CIE 1.6.1; FLUE 1.3.1; Sidewalk Improvements Howell Creek FUTURE 1CTX New Sidewalks and Pedestrian Bridge at Winter Springs Blvd and Howell Creek Winter Spgs Blvd/ Howell Creek 8 500,000$ 500,000$ FLUE 1.3.1; TE 1.2 Sidewalks FUTURE LGTX Safety improvement; Improves City collector streets with the addition of sidewalks to increase safety of pedestrians in cooperation with Seminole County. City Wide 2 50,000$ 50,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 325,000$ FLUE 1.3.1; TE 1.2 Right Turn Deceleration Lane on SR 434 at Winding Hollow Blvd.FUTURE LGTX Addresses future deficiency of SR 434 by adding a deceleration lane to ensure adequate movement of people and goods. Grant funded for right-of-way acquisition and construction. SR 434 at Winding Hollow Blvd.8 550,000$ 100,000$ 650,000$ CIE 1.3.1; FLUE 1.3.1; TE 1; TE 1.2 Right Turn Deceleration Lane on SR 434 at City Hall FUTURE LGTX Addresses future deficiency of SR 434 by adding a deceleration lane to ensure adequate movement of people and goods. SR 434 & City Hall Entrance 8 500,000$ 500,000$ TE 1; TE 1.2; CIE 1.3.1;FLUE 1.3.1; Right Turn Deceleration Lane on SR 434 at Tuscora Drive FUTURE TIMF Addresses future deficiency of SR 434 by adding a deceleration lane to ensure adequate movement of people and goods. SR 434 & Tuscora Drive 8 250,000$ 250,000$ TE 1; TE 1.2; CIE 1.3.1; FLUE 1.3.1; TOTAL EXPENSE 3,805,000$ 3,675,000$ 2,875,000$ 1,425,000$ 1,425,000$ 13,205,000$ TOTAL REVENUE 2,332,000$ 2,332,000$ 2,332,000$ 532,000$ 532,000$ 8,060,000$ L E G E N D: Funding Sources: Funding Sources: 1CTX LGTX ARPA American Rescue Plan Act PIMF BND R&R CF-301 1999 Construction Capital Project Fund - 301 SUF CF-303 TIMF GNF UCF GRT UEF Construction Fund - 303 Utility Enterprise Fund Park & Rec Impact Fee Fund Utility Renewal & Replacement Fund Utility Construction Fund One Cent Sales Tax (Road Improvement Fund) - 121 Bonds Stormwater Utility Enterprise Fund Transportation Impact Fee Fund Grants & CDBG (Comm Dev Block Grant) General Fund Local Option Gas Tax (Transportation Improvement 99 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT IX - 17 Project Name LOS Purpose Funding Source Description / Justification Location Ranking Score Current Yr Year 1 2016/2017 Year 2 2017/2018 Year 3 2018/2019 Year 4 2019/2020 Year 5 2020/2021 TOTALS (Years 1-5) Comprehensive Plan Reference LOS: SANITARY SEWER West Force Main Rerouting / Design FUTURE UEF Project needed to meet future demand; Bolsters service to new growth; Improves efficiency.Lift Station 10 Discharge 8 -$ -$ -$ 210,000$ 210,000$ HE 1.3.9; IE IV.A.4.3; FLUE 1.3.1; CIE 1.3.3; IE IV.A.1.5; HE 1.19 East Force Main Rerouting / Design FUTURE UEF & UCF Project needed to meet future demand; Bolsters service to new growth; Improves efficiency.Tuskawilla 8 -$ -$ 1,200,000$ 1,200,000$ HE 1.3.9; IE IV.A.4.3; FLUE 1.3.1; CIE 1.3.3; IE IV.A.1.5; HE 1.19 Lift Station #7 Upgrades REPLCMT UEF Major maintenance to master pump station.Lift Station #7 - S. Edgemon Avenue 6 44,000$ 150,000$ -$ -$ CIE 1.6.1; IE IV.B.2; IE IV.B.2.1 Lift Station Upgrades REPLCMT UEF Major maintenance to pump stations - 10W & 1E in FY17 Alton Road 6 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 375,000$ CIE 1.6.1; IE IV.B.2; IE IV.B.2.1 Generator Emission Upgrades REPLCMT UEF Meet new Tier 4 Emission Standards East/West WRF & LS 7 6 80,000$ 80,000$ CIE 1.6.1; IE IV.B.2; IE IV.B.2.1 Plant Refurb REPLCMT UEF Major maintenance at East/West WRF Plants East/West WRF 6 125,000$ 280,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 1,080,000$ CIE 1.6.1; IE IV.B.2; IE IV.B.2.1 Sewer Relining REPLCMT UEF Sewer Relining Various 6 200,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 1,250,000$ CIE 1.6.1; IE IV.B.2; IE IV.B.2.1 Consolidate Wastewater Plants FUTURE UEF Replace East WRF to accommodate City wide flow and convert West WRF to a reclaimed water pump station - design East/West WRF 6 -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ 400,000$ 800,000$ CIE 1.6.1; IE IV.B.2; IE IV.B.2.1 Sewer Vacuum Truck REPLCMT UEF Replace existing 2000 vaccum truck Compound 6 -$ 350,000$ -$ 400,000$ 400,000$ 1,150,000$ CIE 1.6.1; IE IV.B.2; IE IV.B.2.1 WWRF Sand Filter REPLACE UEF Project needed to meet future demand; Increases capacity for new growth; Improves efficiency.WWRF 6 -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ 250,000$ HE 1.3.9; FLUE 1.3.1; CIE 1.3.3; IE IV.A.1.5; HE 1.19 Total 979,000$ 1,275,000$ 1,975,000$ 1,785,000$ 1,325,000$ 6,645,000$ Project Name LOS Purpose Funding Source Description/ Justification Location Ranking Score Current Yr Year 1 2016/2017 Year 2 2017/2018 Year 3 2018/2019 Year 4 2019/2020 Year 5 2020/2021 TOTALS (Years 1-5) Comprehensive Plan Reference LOS: RECLAIMED WATER Control Upgrades FUTURE UEF Update SCADA controls for West WRF Operations & Reclaimed Systems West WRF 6 30,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ CIE 1.6.1; IE IV.B.2; IE IV.B.2.1 Reclaimed Distribution System Expansion FUTURE UEF Northern Way to Vistawilla Main Extension Tuscawilla 6 800,000$ 800,000$ CIE 1.6.1; IE IV.B.2; IE IV.B.2.1 Total 150,000$ 800,000$ -$ -$ -$ 950,000$ Project Name LOS Purpose Funding Source Description/ Justification Location Ranking Score Current Yr Year 1 2016/2017 Year 2 2017/2018 Year 3 2018/2019 Year 4 2019/2020 Year 5 2020/2021 TOTALS (Years 1-5) Comprehensive Plan Reference LOS: FACILITIES City Hall Generator REPLACEM ENT 1CTX (3RD GEN)Replace 1986 City Hall Generator and Transfer Switch City Hall 6 300,000$ 300,000$ CIE 1.6.1; IE IV.B.2; IE IV.B.2.1 City Hall Roof Replacement REPLACEMENT 1CTX (3RD GEN)Replace 1986 City Hall Roof City Hall 6 400,000$ 400,000$ CIE 1.6.1; IE IV.B.2; IE IV.B.2.1 City Commission Chambers Renovation REPLACEM ENT 305 Fund Upgrade City Commission Chambers City Hall 6 75,000$ 75,000$ CIE 1.6.1; IE IV.B.2; IE IV.B.2.1 Total 775,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 775,000$ Project Name LOS Purpose Funding Source Description/ Justification Location Ranking Score Current Yr Year 1 2016/2017 Year 2 2017/2018 Year 3 2018/2019 Year 4 2019/2020 Year 5 2020/2021 TOTALS (Years 1-5) Comprehensive Plan Reference LOS: STORMWATER Edgemon and Lombardy Canal Piping REPLACE SUF Major maintenance enabling efficient operation Lombardy Road area 6 -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ 300,000.00$ CIE 1.3.2; CIE 1.6.1; FLUE 1.3.1; HE 1.1.9 Bridge Scour Testing and Repairs REPLACE 1CTX (3RD GEN) / SUF Scour Critical Bridge Testing and Repairs Various 6 250,000$ 100,000$ 75,000$ 425,000.00$ CIE 1.3.2; CIE 1.6.1; FLUE 1.3.1; HE 1.1.9 Pond 59 Outfall REPLACE SUF Replace pond outfall structure and pipe Pond 59 (Chelsea Woods)6 75,000$ 75,000.00$ CIE 1.3.2; CIE 1.6.1; FLUE 1.3.1; HE 1.1.9 North Tuskawilla Road Outfall REPLACE GRT/SUF Replace stormwater outfall and add water quality features North Tuskawilla Road at Lake Jesup 6 200,000$ 200,000.00$ CIE 1.3.2; CIE 1.6.1; FLUE 1.3.1; HE 1.1.9 Winding Hollow Wetland Treatment Area FUTURE 1CTX (3RD GEN) / SUF Mandate to meet State water quality TMDL regulations; Improves surface water quality.Winding Hollow Subdivision 6 -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 300,000$ 350,000.00$ CIE 1.3.2; IE IV.D.1.1; CE 1.3.2 Stormwater Pipe Relining and Replacement REPLACE 1CTX (3RD GEN) / SUF Reline or Replace Failing Storm Piping Various 6 75,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 225,000.00$ CIE 1.3.2; CIE 1.6.1; FLUE 1.3.1; HE 1.1.9 Total 600,000$ 150,000$ 125,000$ 100,000$ 600,000$ 1,575,000$ 100 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT IX - 18 Project Name LOS Purpose Funding Source Description/ Justification Location Ranking Score Current Yr Year 1 2016/2017 Year 2 2017/2018 Year 3 2018/2019 Year 4 2019/2020 Year 5 2020/2021 TOTALS (Years 1-5) Comprehensive Plan Reference LOS: TRANSPORTATION Right Turn Deceleration Lane on SR 434 at Winding Hollow Blvd. REPLCMT GRT Addresses future deficiency of SR 434 by adding a deceleration lane to ensure adequate movement of people and goods. Grant funded for right-of-way acquisition and construction. SR 434 at Winding Hollow Blvd.6 300,000$ 250,000$ -$ -$ -$ 550,000$ CIE 1.3.1; CIE 1.6.1; FLUE 1.3.1; Bridge Infrastructure REPLCMT 1CTX (3RD GEN)Addresses bridge deficiency of various bridge throughout the City Various 6 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 1,250,000$ CIE 1.3.1; CIE 1.6.1; FLUE 1.3.1; Right Turn Deceleration Lane on SR 434 at Tuscora Drive FUTURE TIMF Addresses future deficiency of SR 434 by adding a deceleration lane to ensure adequate movement of people and goods. SR 434 & Tuscora Drive 6 250,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ TE 1; TE 1.2; CIE 1.3.1; CIE 1.6.1; FLUE 1.3.1; Right Turn Deceleration Lane on SR 434 at City Hall FUTURE 1CTX (2ND GEN) / TIMF Addresses future deficiency of SR 434 by adding a deceleration lane to ensure adequate movement of people and goods. SR 434 & City Hall Entrance 6 250,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ TE 1; TE 1.2; CIE 1.3.1; CIE 1.6.1; FLUE 1.3.1; GID Transportation Improvements FUTURE 1CTX (2ND GEN) / TIMF New Roadway Network to Serve GID Development GID 6 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ HE 1.1.9; CIE 1.3.1; FLUE 1.3.1 Intersection Improvements at SR 434 and Michael Blake Blvd.FUTURE 1CTX (3RD GEN) / TIMF New traffic signal and related intersection improvements Town Center 6 -$ 400,000$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ HE 1.1.9; CIE 1.3.1; FLUE 1.3.1 Intersection Improvements at SR 434 and Integra Entrance Road FUTURE TIMF New traffic signal and related intersection improvements SR 434 at Integra 360 Entrance 6 -$ -$ 350,000$ 350,000$ HE 1.1.9; CIE 1.3.1; FLUE 1.3.1 Residential Road Reconstruction REPLCMT 1CTX (3RD GEN) / LOGT Rebuilds existing neighborhood streets so that transportation network is maintained.Various 6 620,000$ 500,000$ 500,000$ 500,000$ 500,000$ 2,620,000$ CIE 1.3.1; CIE 1.6.1; FLUE 1.3.1; Central Winds Park Roadway Improvements - Phase 2 (Orange Avenue Extension)FUTURE 1CTX (3RD GEN) / TIMF Services future demand and addresses future deficiency of SR 434 by expanding interconnecting collector road network in Town Center to reduce demand on SR 434. Town Center/Central Winds Park 6 -$ -$ 2,000,000$ -$ -$ 2,000,000$ CIE 1.7; CIE 1.7.4; FLUE 1.3.1; TE 1.2; TE 1.2.4; TE 1.3 Town Center Sidewalk Improvements FUTURE GRT New sidewalks in the Town Center District Town Center 6 -$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ TE 1; TE 1.2; CIE 1.3.1; CIE 1.6.1; FLUE 1.3.1; North Village Walk Phase 2 Sidewalk Improvements FUTURE GRT New sidewalks in SR 434 Village Walk area Village Walk (Connecting Streets)-$ -$ -$ 300,000$ -$ 300,000$ TE 1; TE 1.2; CIE 1.3.1; CIE 1.6.1; FLUE 1.3.1; SR 434 Streetscape FUTURE CRA Sidewalk, Hardscape, and Landscape Improvements on SR 434 at western City limits SR 434 from US 17-92 to Talmo St.6 -$ 150,000$ -$ -$ -$ 150,000$ CIE 1.3.1; CIE 1.6.1; FLUE 1.3.1; Florida Avenue Streetscape FUTURE CRA Roadway, Landscape, Hardscape, and Stormwater Improvements Florida Avenue 6 46,000$ 391,786$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 391,786$ CIE 1.3.1; CIE 1.6.1; FLUE 1.3.1; Total 2,161,786$ 1,850,000$ 2,750,000$ 1,400,000$ 750,000$ 8,911,786$ 101 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT IX - 19 L E G E N D: Funding Sources: Funding Sources: Funding Sources: 1CTX PIMF PIMF CF-305 R&R R&R FDOT TLBD Assessment District (Tuscawilla Lighting & Beautifictn) TLBD GNF UCF UCF GRT UEF UEF LGTX CRA CRA 1999 Construction Capital Project Fund - 305 One Cent Sales Tax (Road Improvement Fund) - 115 Grants & CDBG Florida Dept of Transportation General Fund Local Option Gas Tax (Transportation Improvement Fund) 102 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT IX - 20 Table IX – 2: Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements (SCI) FY 2013/14 – 2017/18 2021/22 – 2025/26by Fund Project Name LOS Category Funding Source Description/ Justification Location Ranking Score Current Yr 2013/2014 Year 1 2014/2015 Year 2 2015/2016 Year 3 2016/2017 Year 4 2017/2018 Year 5 2018/2019 TOTALS Comprehensive Plan Reference 1CTX - ONE CENT SALES TAX (ROAD IMPROVEMENT FUND) - 115 Doran Drive REPLCMT 1CTX Doran Drive (Blumberg to high school)- Refurbishes collector road so that existing LOS is maintained.Town Center 6 200,000$ 200,000$ CIE 1.3.1; CIE 1.6.1; FLUE 1.3.1; GID FUTURE 1CTX Road Networks to Serve GID GID 6 500,000$ 700,000$ 700,000$ -$ -$ 1,900,000$ HE 1.1.9; CIE 1.3.1; FLUE 1.3.1 Residential Road Reconstruction REPLCMT 1CTX Rebuilds existing neighborhood streets so that transportation network is maintained.Various 6 280,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 1,480,000$ CIE 1.3.1; CIE 1.6.1; FLUE 1.3.1; GID Transportation Improvements FUTURE 1CTX New Roadway Network to Serve GID Development GID 6 500,000$ 700,000$ 700,000$ -$ -$ 1,900,000$ HE 1.1.9; CIE 1.3.1; FLUE 1.3.1 Magnolia Park FUTURE 1CTX Outdoor amphitheatre furthers the network of public green spaces that form the framework for the Town Center and promotes & expands trail system; Improves recreational opportunities consistent with the recreational needs of residents; Is a catalyst for private development in the Town Center; Accomodates growth through additional acreage for active recreation [LOS]. Winter Springs Town Center 10 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ ROS- 1.1.1; ROS-1.4; ROS- 1.5.2; FLUE- 1.3.1; FLUE-2.1.5; FLUE- 2.2.3; CIE- 1.3.1 Intersection Improvements at SR 434 and Michael Blake Blvd. FUTURE 1CTX New traffic signal and related intersection improvements Town Center 6 -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ -$ 400,000$ T O T A L 1 C T X E X P E N S E 1,780,000$ 1,700,000$ 1,700,000$ 700,000$ 300,000$ 6,180,000$ T O T A L 1 C T X R E V E N U E 3,200,000$ 1,900,000$ 1,900,000$ 1,900,000$ 1,900,000$ 10,800,000$ Project Name LOS Category Funding Source Description/ Justification Location Ranking Score Current Yr 2013/2014 Year 1 2014/2015 Year 2 2015/2016 Year 3 2016/2017 Year 4 2017/2018 Year 5 2018/2019 TOTALS Comprehensive Plan Reference CF-305 1999 CONSTRUCTION CAPITAL PROJECT FUND Magnolia Park FUTURE CF-305 Outdoor amphitheatre furthers the network of public green spaces that form the framework for the Town Center and promotes & expands trail system; Improves recreational opportunities consistent with the recreational needs of residents; Is a catalyst for private development in the Town Center; Accomodates growth through additional acreage for active recreation [LOS]. Winter Springs Town Center 10 917,125$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 917,125$ ROS- 1.1.1; ROS-1.4; ROS- 1.5.2; FLUE- 1.3.1; FLUE-2.1.5; FLUE- 2.2.3; CIE- 1.3.1 T O T A L C F - 3 0 5 E X P E N S E 917,125$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 917,125$ T O T A L C F - 3 0 5 R E V E N U E 917,125$ -$ -$ -$ 917,125$ 103 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT IX - 21 Project Name LOS Category Funding Source Description/ Justification Location Ranking Score Current Yr 2013/2014 Year 1 2014/2015 Year 2 2015/2016 Year 3 2016/2017 Year 4 2017/2018 Year 5 2018/2019 TOTALS Comprehensive Plan Reference GRT - GRANTS & CDBG Intersection Improvements at SR 434 and Tuskawilla Road (Market Square) REPLCMT GRT Safety and operational improvements at the SR 434 / Tuskawilla Road Intersection and along the Town Center Frontage Road Town Center 6 500,000$ 600,000$ -$ -$ -$ 1,100,000$ CIE 1.3.1; CIE 1.6.1; FLUE 1.3.1; Winding Hollow Decel Lane REPLCMT GRT Addresses future deficiency of SR 434 by adding a deceleration lane to ensure adequate movement of people and goods. SR 434 at Winding Hollow Blvd.6 -$ 250,000$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ CIE 1.3.1; CIE 1.6.1; FLUE 1.3.1; Town Center Sidewalk Improvements FUTURE GRT New sidewalks in the Town Center District Town Center 6 -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ -$ 300,000$ TE 1; TE 1.2; CIE 1.3.1; CIE 1.6.1; FLUE 1.3.1; T O T A L G R T E X P E N S E 500,000$ 850,000$ -$ 300,000$ -$ 1,650,000$ T O T A L G R T R E V E N U E 500,000$ 850,000$ -$ 300,000$ -$ 1,650,000$ Project Name LOS Category Funding Source Description/ Justification Location Ranking Score Current Yr 2013/2014 Year 1 2014/2015 Year 2 2015/2016 Year 3 2016/2017 Year 4 2017/2018 Year 5 2018/2019 TOTALS Comprehensive Plan Reference CRA - 17-92 COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMEN AGENCY SR 434 Streetscape FUTURE CRA Sidewalk, Hardscape, and Landscape Improvements on SR 434 at western City limits SR 434 from US 17-92 to Talmo St. 6 50,000$ 485,000$ -$ -$ -$ 535,000$ CIE 1.3.1; CIE 1.6.1; FLUE 1.3.1; Florida Avenue Streetscape FUTURE CRA Roadway, Landscape, Hardscape, and Stormwater Improvements Florida Avenue 6 -$ 765,000$ -$ -$ -$ 765,000$ CIE 1.3.1; CIE 1.6.1; FLUE 1.3.1; T O T A L P I M F E X P E N S E 50,000$ 1,250,000$ -$ -$ -$ 1,300,000$ T O T A L P I M F R E V E N U E 50,000$ 1,250,000$ -$ -$ -$ 1,300,000$ Project Name LOS Category Funding Source Description/ Justification Location Ranking Score Current Yr 2013/2014 Year 1 2014/2015 Year 2 2015/2016 Year 3 2016/2017 Year 4 2017/2018 Year 5 2018/2019 TOTALS Comprehensive Plan Reference SUF - STORMWATER UTILITY (ENTERPRISE) FUND Lombardy Canal Piping REPLACE SUF Major maintenance enabling efficient operation Lombardy Road area 6 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000.00$ CIE 1.3.2; CIE 1.6.1; FLUE 1.3.1; HE 1.1.9 Northern Way Bridge Erosion Repairs REPLACE SUF Major erosion control project at the northwest side of the bridge Northern Way at Howell Creek Bridge (south)6 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000.00$ CIE 1.3.2; CIE 1.6.1; FLUE 1.3.1; HE 1.1.9 Backhoe Replacement REPLACE SUF Replacement of 1996 Combination Backhoe Compound 6 80,000$ 80,000.00$ CIE 1.3.2; CIE 1.6.1; FLUE 1.3.1; HE 1.1.9 Stormwater Pipe Relining and Replacement REPLACE SUF Reline or Replace Failing Storm Piping Various 6 25,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 225,000.00$ CIE 1.3.2; CIE 1.6.1; FLUE 1.3.1; HE 1.1.9 Winding Hollow Wetland Treatment Area FUTURE SUF Mandate to meet State water quality TMDL regulations; Improves surface water quality.Winding Hollow Subdivision 6 -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 300,000$ 350,000.00$ CIE 1.3.2; IE IV.D.1.1; CE 1.3.2 T O T A L S U F E X P E N S E 325,000$ 130,000$ 50,000$ 100,000$ 350,000$ 955,000$ T O T A L S U F R E V E N U E 1,035,000$ 1,040,000$ 1,042,000$ 1,045,000$ 1,047,000$ 5,209,000$ 104 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT IX - 22 Project Name LOS Category Funding Source Description/ Justification Location Ranking Score Current Yr 2013/2014 Year 1 2014/2015 Year 2 2015/2016 Year 3 2016/2017 Year 4 2017/2018 Year 5 2018/2019 TOTALS Comprehensive Plan Reference SUF - STORMWATER UTILITY (ENTERPRISE) FUND Lombardy Canal Piping REPLACE SUF Major maintenance enabling efficient operation Lombardy Road area 6 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000.00$ CIE 1.3.2; CIE 1.6.1; FLUE 1.3.1; HE 1.1.9 Northern Way Bridge Erosion Repairs REPLACE SUF Major erosion control project at the northwest side of the bridge Northern Way at Howell Creek Bridge (south)6 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000.00$ CIE 1.3.2; CIE 1.6.1; FLUE 1.3.1; HE 1.1.9 Backhoe Replacement REPLACE SUF Replacement of 1996 Combination Backhoe Compound 6 80,000$ 80,000.00$ CIE 1.3.2; CIE 1.6.1; FLUE 1.3.1; HE 1.1.9 Stormwater Pipe Relining and Replacement REPLACE SUF Reline or Replace Failing Storm Piping Various 6 25,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 225,000.00$ CIE 1.3.2; CIE 1.6.1; FLUE 1.3.1; HE 1.1.9 Winding Hollow Wetland Treatment Area FUTURE SUF Mandate to meet State water quality TMDL regulations; Improves surface water quality.Winding Hollow Subdivision 6 -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 300,000$ 350,000.00$ CIE 1.3.2; IE IV.D.1.1; CE 1.3.2 T O T A L S U F E X P E N S E 325,000$ 130,000$ 50,000$ 100,000$ 350,000$ 955,000$ T O T A L S U F R E V E N U E 1,035,000$ 1,040,000$ 1,042,000$ 1,045,000$ 1,047,000$ 5,209,000$ Project Name LOS Category Funding Source Description/ Justification Location Ranking Score Current Yr 2013/2014 Year 1 2014/2015 Year 2 2015/2016 Year 3 2016/2017 Year 4 2017/2018 Year 5 2018/2019 TOTALS Comprehensive Plan Reference TIMF - TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE FUND Tuscora Decel Lane FUTURE TIMF Addresses future deficiency of SR 434 by adding a deceleration lane to ensure adequate movement of people and goods. SR 434 & Tuscora Drive 6 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ TE 1; TE 1.2; CIE 1.3.1; CIE 1.6.1; FLUE 1.3.1; Central Winds Park Roadway Improvements - Phase 1 FUTURE TIMF Services future demand and addresses future deficiency of SR 434 by expanding interconnecting collector road network in Town Center to reduce demand on SR 434. Town Center/Central Winds Park 6 350,000$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ 650,000$ CIE 1.7; CIE 1.7.4; FLUE 1.3.1; TE 1.2; TE 1.2.4; TE 1.3 T O T A L T I M F E X P E N S E 550,000$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ 850,000$ T O T A L T I M F R E V E N U E 662,450$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 1,862,450$ 105 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT IX - 23 Project Name LOS Category Funding Source Description/ Justification Location Ranking Score Current Yr 2013/2014 Year 1 2014/2015 Year 2 2015/2016 Year 3 2016/2017 Year 4 2017/2018 Year 5 2018/2019 TOTALS Comprehensive Plan Reference UCF - UTILITY CONSTRUCTION FUND East Force Main Improvements FUTURE UCF Increase Force Main Capacity to Serve GID and alleviate current LOS deficiencies Northern Way/Vistawilla Drive 6 157,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 157,000$ IE IV.B.3.2; FLUE 1.3.1; HE 1.3.9; IE IV.E.1.7; CE 1.2.8 T O T A L U C F E X P E N S E 157,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 157,000$ T O T A L U C F R E V E N U E 157,000$ -$ -$ -$ 157,000$ Project Name LOS Category Funding Source Description/ Justification Location Ranking Score Current Yr 2013/2014 Year 1 2014/2015 Year 2 2015/2016 Year 3 2016/2017 Year 4 2017/2018 Year 5 2018/2019 TOTALS Comprehensive Plan Reference LOGT - LOCAL OPTION GAS TAX /TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT FUND Residential Road Reconstruction REPLCMT LOGT/1CTX Rebuilds existing neighborhood streets so that transportation network is maintained.Various 6 280,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 680,000$ CIE 1.3.1; CIE 1.6.1; FLUE 1.3.1; Tractor REPLCMT LOGT Replace Tractor used for mowing Rights of Way PWC 6 75,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 75,000$ CIE 1.3.1; CIE 1.6.1; FLUE 1.3.1; T O T A L LOGT E X P E N S E 355,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 755,000$ T O T A L LOGT R E V E N U E 500,000$ 500,000$ 500,000$ 500,000$ 500,000$ 2,500,000$ Project Name LOS Category Funding Source Description/ Justification Location Ranking Score Current Yr 2013/2014 Year 1 2014/2015 Year 2 2015/2016 Year 3 2016/2017 Year 4 2017/2018 Year 5 2018/2019 TOTALS Comprehensive Plan Reference 311 FUND - UTILTY/PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY Administration Building at Public Works Compound FUTURE 311 Construct Admin Building at Public Works Compound to Centralize Management Team and eliminate Rental Trailer Pulbic Works Compound 6 965,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 965,000$ IE IV.B.3.2; FLUE 1.3.1; T O T A L U C F E X P E N S E 965,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 965,000$ T O T A L U C F R E V E N U E 965,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 965,000$ 106 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT IX - 24 L E G E N D: Funding Sources: Funding Sources: 1CTX PIMF CF-305 R&R FDOT TLBD Assessment District (Tuscawilla Lighting & Beautifictn) GRT UCF LGTX UEF Utility Enterprise Utility Construction Fund Florida Dept of Transportation Grants & CDBG Utility Renewal & Replacement Fund 1999 Construction Capital Project Fund - 305 Local Option Gas Tax (Transportation Improvement Fund) One Cent Sales Tax (Road Improvement Fund) - 115 Park & Rec Impact Fee Fund Project Name LOS Category Funding Source Description/ Justification Location Ranking Score Current Yr 2013/2014 Year 1 2014/2015 Year 2 2015/2016 Year 3 2016/2017 Year 4 2017/2018 Year 5 2018/2019 TOTALS Comprehensive Plan Reference UEF - UTILITY ENTERPRISE FUND Lift Station #7 Upgrades REPLCMT UEF Major maintenance to master pump station. Lift Station #7 - S. Edgemon Avenue 6 90,000$ -$ -$ -$ 90,000$ CIE 1.6.1; IE IV.B.2; IE IV.B.2.1 Plant Refurb REPLCMT UEF Major maintenance at West WRF Plant #1 West WRF 6 140,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ -$ 590,000$ CIE 1.6.1; IE IV.B.2; IE IV.B.2.1 Sewer Relining REPLCMT UEF Sewer Relining Various 6 200,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 1,250,000$ CIE 1.6.1; IE IV.B.2; IE IV.B.2.1 New Variable Frequency Controls WTP#3 REPLCMT UEF Control upgrades.WTP #3 6 25,000$ 50,000$ -$ -$ -$ 75,000$ CIE 1.6.1; IE IV.B.2; IE IV.B.2.1 WTP#1 Treatment Improvements FUTURE UEF Process Control Improvements to meet new Federal water quality standards WTP #1 6 220,000$ 150,000$ 1,500,000$ 1,500,000$ -$ 3,370,000$ CIE 1.6.1; IE IV.B.2; IE IV.B.2.1 West Force Main Rerouting / Design FUTURE UEF Project needed to meet future demand; Bolsters service to new growth; Improves efficiency.Lift Station 10 Discharge 8 -$ -$ 210,000$ -$ 210,000$ HE 1.3.9; IE IV.A.4.3; FLUE 1.3.1; CIE 1.3.3; IE IV.A.1.5; HE 1.19 Control Upgrades REPLCMT UEF Control Upgrades at the East and West WRF's to balance reclaimed system pressures West/East WRF 6 110,000$ 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ 210,000$ CIE 1.6.1; IE IV.B.2; IE IV.B.2.1 East Force Main Rerouting / Design FUTURE UEF Project needed to meet future demand; Bolsters service to new growth; Improves efficiency.Tuskawilla 8 410,000$ -$ 300,000$ -$ -$ 710,000$ HE 1.3.9; IE IV.A.4.3; FLUE 1.3.1; CIE 1.3.3; IE IV.A.1.5; HE 1.19 WWRF Sand Filter REPLACE UEF Project needed to meet future demand; Increases capacity for new growth; Improves efficiency.WWRF 6 -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ -$ 250,000$ HE 1.3.9; FLUE 1.3.1; CIE 1.3.3; IE IV.A.1.5; HE 1.19 T O T A L U E F E X P E N S E 1,155,000$ 790,000$ 2,200,000$ 2,360,000$ 250,000$ 6,755,000$ T O T A L U E F R E V E N U E 8,072,150$ 8,750,000$ 8,775,000$ 8,800,000$ 8,825,000$ 43,222,150$ 107 CAPITAL IMROVEMENTS ELEMENT CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IX - 25 108 CAPITAL IMROVEMENTS ELEMENT CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IX - 26 B. SUMMARY The Capital Improvements Element (CIE) is the mechanism used to guide and implement the Comprehensive Plan through the programming of public facilities and services as identified in the other elements of the Comprehensive Plan. The CIE is to be annually updated and adopted to reflect the timing and funding of capital projects to meet or maintain adopted Levels of Service (LOS) standards or implement the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan. (Ord. 2012-14) The purpose of the CIE and the Schedule of Capital Improvements (SCI) is to ensure that necessary facilities and infrastructure will be in place to meet the LOS standards established within the Comprehensive Plan, by addressing them through the annual budgeting process. The SCI also acts as a monitoring system to ensure that programmed capital improvements are actually completed during the five-year planning period. The SCI includes those capital improvement projects for which the local government has fiscal responsibility, as well as some projects for which the City does not have fiscal responsibility, including school facilities, certain transportation facilities, some water supply facilities, and privately funded projects necessary to ensure that adopted LOS standards are achieved and maintained. Capital improvements must be based on sufficient revenues being currently available or available from committed funding sources for the first three years of the CIE. Sufficient revenues for years 4 and 5 shall be demonstrated by ensuring that funds are committed or planned. Revenue sources may include: tax revenues, bonds, state and federal funds, impact fees, service charges, and developer contributions. Expenditures or appropriations included in the City’s annual operating and capital budget are to coincide with SCI as well as the City’s capital improvements program. (Ord. 2012-14) Concurrency related facilities in the following areas are to be included: Transportation Facilities Sanitary Sewer Potable Water Solid Waste Stormwater (drainage) Parks and Recreation Schools If the LOS Standards are not met, City concurrency management policies requires a local government tothe denial ofy applications for development orders and permits until the deficiency is addressed. In order to assure that facilities will be in place to maintain LOS standards in a timely manner and prevent a concurrency moratorium, the SCI must address known or identified deficiencies. [Note: Land acquisition and design studies should be included, but do not satisfy concurrency- Only programmed construction phases satisfy concurrency.] (Ord. 2012-14) 109 City of Winter Springs Ordinance No. 2021-07 Page 1 of 4 ORDINANCE NO. 2021-07 A ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, SETTING FORTH AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT BASED ON THE CITY’S EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PURSUANT TO SECTION 163.3191, FLORIDA STATUTES; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF PRIOR INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS; INCORPORATION INTO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; LEGAL STATUS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS; SEVERABILITY; AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Florida Legislature intends that local planning be a continuous and ongoing process; and WHEREAS, section 163.3161 et. seq., Florida Statutes, established Community Planning Act; and WHEREAS, consistent with the Community Planning Act, the City Commission has adopted the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, as required by section 163.3191, Florida Statutes, the City has conducted an evaluation of its Comprehensive Plan, Capital Improvements Element, to determine if plan amendments are necessary to reflect changes in state requirements since the last update of the City’s Comprehensive Plan, which is required to be adopted every seven (7) years to assess the progress of implementing the City=s Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, section 163.3177, Florida Statutes, requires that the Comprehensive Plan contain a capital improvements element designed to consider the need for and the location of public facilities in order to encourage the efficient use of such facilities and set forth components that outline principles for construction, extension, or increase in capacity of public facilities and principles for correcting existing public facility deficiencies, which are necessary to implement the comprehensive plan, covering at least a 5-year period; and WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency has reviewed the amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, Capital Improvements Element, set forth herein, held an advertised public hearing, provided for participation by the public in the process, and rendered its recommendations to 110 City of Winter Springs Ordinance No. 2021-07 Page 2 of 4 the City Commission; and WHEREAS, the City Commission, after considering the Local Planning Agency=s review comments and recommendations for amendments to the Capital Improvements Element, desires to adopt the amendments set forth herein; and WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, hereby finds this ordinance to be in the best interests of the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Winter Springs. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS HEREBY ORDAINS, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are fully incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2. Authority. This Ordinance is adopted in compliance with, and pursuant to, the Community Planning Act, Sections 163.3184 and 163.3191, Florida Statutes. Section 3. Purpose and Intent. The purpose and intent of this ordinance is to adopt text amendments to the City’s Comprehensive Plan as set forth herein, which are based on the City=s evaluation and appraisal of the Comprehensive Plan pursuant to Section 163.3191, Florida Statutes. Section 4. Adoption of Text Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, Capital Improvements Element. The Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan, Capital Improvements Element is hereby amended only as specifically enumerated and set forth in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and fully incorporated herein by this reference. (Underlined type indicates additions and strikeout type indicates deletions). It is intended that the text in the Comprehensive Plan not specifically enumerated and set forth in this Exhibit shall remain unchanged from the language existing prior to adoption of this Ordinance). Section 5. Transmittal to the Department of Economic Opportunity. The City Manager or his designee is hereby designated to sign a letter transmitting the adopted Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity for state coordinated review and to any other agency or local government providing timely comments, in accordance with Section 163.3184(4), Florida Statutes. Section 6. Repeal of Prior Inconsistent Ordinances and Resolutions. All prior inconsistent ordinances and resolutions adopted by the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, or parts of ordinances and resolutions in conflict herewith, are hereby repealed to the extent of the conflict. 111 City of Winter Springs Ordinance No. 2021-07 Page 3 of 4 Section 7. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, word or provision of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, whether for substantive, procedural, or any other reason, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. Section 8. Incorporation Into Comprehensive Plan. Upon the effective date of the Comprehensive Plan Amendments adopted by this Ordinance, said Amendments shall be incorporated into the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan and any section or paragraph number or letter and any heading may be changed or modified as necessary to effectuate the foregoing. Section 9. Effective Date and Legal Status of the Plan Amendment. The effective date of the Comprehensive Plan Amendments adopted by this Ordinance shall be pursuant to the state land planning agency’s notice of intent. If timely challenged, an amendment does not become effective until the state land planning agency or the Administration Commission enters a final order determining the adopted amendment to be in compliance as defined in section 163.3184, Florida Statutes. No development orders, development permits, or land use dependent on these Amendments may be issued or commenced before it has become effective. If a final order of noncompliance is issued by the Administration Commission, the Amendments may nevertheless be made effective by adoption of a resolution affirming its effective status. After and from the effective date of these Amendments, the Comprehensive Plan Amendments set forth herein shall amend the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan and become a part of that plan, and the Amendments shall have the legal status of the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan, as amended. ADOPTED by the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, in a regular meeting assembled on the ____ day of ________________, 2021. ____________________________________ Kevin McCann, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ Christian Gowan, City Clerk Approved as to legal form and sufficiency for the City of Winter Springs only: ______________________________________ Anthony A. Garganese, City Attorney Transmittal Hearing: _____________________ Adoption Hearing: _____________________ 112 City of Winter Springs Ordinance No. 2021-07 Page 4 of 4 Effective Date: _____________________ 113 WEATHER World TodayTomorrow City HLSkies HL Beach report Boating report Hightide Lowtide WaterWindSeasWaves Nation TodayTomorrow City HLSkiesH L Rainfall Skywatch Pollen report Orlando almanac LowModerateHigh V.HighExtreme The highertheAccuWeather.comUVIndex™number,thegreatertheneedforeyeandskinprotection.Shownisthehighestvalueoftheday. —National AllergyBureau Tallahassee Leesburg Clermont Tampa Sarasota Fort Myers Key West Miami Kissimmee Melbourne Titusville Sanford DeLand Daytona Beach Gainesville Jacksonville Orlando 87/69 87/69 86/72 88/70 88/72 85/71 87/74 89/73 88/76 86/79 91/71 89/72 91/75 90/72 90/72 85/71 88/72 Today’sOrlando high:88° Acapulco 88 76 pc 88 76 Amsterdam 62 52 sh 59 52Athens7759s7860 Baghdad 96 68 pc 93 68 Beijing 64 53 sh 61 52 Berlin 61 53 c6352Bogota6849r6649 BuenosAires 67 54 s6954 Cairo 85 66 s8466Caracas9077sh9077 Copenhagen 59 52 sh 58 54 Dublin 57 46 c5543Frankfurt5948sh6247 Geneva 56 49 r6246 Havana 88 70 t8972HongKong9182s9181 Istanbul 68 58 pc 68 57 Jerusalem 76 64 s7561 Jo’burg 70 51 pc 73 56Lisbon7159pc7760 London 61 51 c5750 Madrid 69 47 pc 73 51Manila9081t8879 Montreal 61 51 c6448 Moscow 51 41 c5038Nairobi8057pc8255 Ottawa 60 50 c6348 Paris 64 52 pc 62 50 Prague 65 52 c6951 Rio 87 71 pc 73 70 Rome 80 66 r7563 Seoul 77 72 sh 77 66Singapore8877pc8678 Stockholm 58 50 r5751 Sydney 79 56 s7056Tokyo8070s7970 Toronto 62 55 sh 64 56 Vancouver 57 48 pc 56 46Vienna7558pc7655 Albany!AlbanyNY5851 r5953 Albuquerque 77 54 s7856Anchorage4439s4741 Asheville 73 61 t6761 Atlanta 76 67 t7167AtlanticCity8164t7661 Austin 90 56 pc 89 55 Baltimore 80 64 t7964 Billings 82 56 s8655Birmingham8066t7365 Boise 82 53 s8254 Boston 60 56 r6254Buffalo6859sh6959 BurlingtonVT 61 53 c6451 CharlestonSC 84 69 pc 82 71CharlestonWV7459t7961 Charlotte 80 67 t7968 Chicago 70 62 pc 70 61 Cincinnati 74 62 sh 78 64 Cleveland 72 61 sh 73 61 ColumbiaSC 84 68 t8269 ColumbusOH 74 61 sh 77 62Dallas8760s8761 Denver 80 49 s8050 DesMoines 76 58 s7559Detroit7361sh7258 Fargo 79 53 s8059 Guam 87 79 sh 86 77Hartford6154r6150 Honolulu 87 74 pc 88 75 Houston 88 62 pc 87 61 Indianapolis 74 62 sh 76 61 KansasCity 79 54 s7456 Knoxville 78 64 t7363 LasVegas 89 70 pc 82 63LittleRock8161pc7862 LosAngeles 86 62 pc 80 59 Louisville 78 63 t8066Memphis8064pc7964 Milwaukee 69 61 c6761 Minneapolis 73 54 s7558Mobile8067t7765 Nashville 78 62 t7764 NewOrleans 83 70 t8168 NewYorkCity 73 61 t6659 NorfolkVA 83 67 pc 80 67 Okla.City 82 53 s8151 Omaha 78 50 s7757Philadelphia8066t7664 Phoenix 97 72 pc 84 69 Pittsburgh 72 60 t7560PortlandME5950c6049 PortlandOR 70 52 pc 59 48 Providence 63 57 r6255RochesterNY6557sh6258 St.Louis 76 63 pc 76 62 St.ThomasVI 88 79 s8879 SaltLakeCity 82 57 s7959 SanAntonio 89 61 pc 90 62 SanDiego 80 66 pc 76 66 SanFrancisco 75 57 s6957SanJuanPR9180pc8980 Savannah 85 69 pc 84 71 Seattle 61 48 pc 56 46Spokane7048pc7045 Syracuse 66 57 r6258 Wash.DC 81 66 t7967 Howhotitwillfeel withtheforecast 60%humidityfactoredin:92° Daytona Beach 6:46a 7:10p 12:38a 12:57p 82NewSmyrnaBeach7:17a 7:37p 1:03a 1:16p 82CocoaBeach6:33a 6:58p 12:26a 12:36p 83MelbourneBeach6:42a 7:06p 12:36a 12:57p 83SebastianInlet6:47a 7:11p 12:38a 12:59p 82 St.Augustine -JupiterInlet E6-123-5 ModerateJupiterInlet-Key Largo ENE 6-12 1-3 LightKeyLargo-DryTortugas E7-142-4 LightCapeSable-Tarpon Springs E4-8 1-2LightTarponSprings-Apalachicola ESE4-8 1-2 Light Sunrise 7:20 a.m. Sunset 7:08p.m. Moonrise 5:16a.m. Moonset 6:22 p.m. Full Oct.20 Firstqtr Oct.12 New Oct.6 Lastqtr Oct.28 Mainpollen:Mold Forecastsand graphicsprovided byAccuWeather,Inc.©2021 High yesterday 90 Lowyesterday 73 Avg.for Oct.3 88/70 Record high yest.96 in 1923 Record lowyest.54 in 1920 UV index:3 24-hourtotal Trace Monthtodate 0.18” Normal month to date0.49” October record 19.10”in 1915 Year to date 36.88” Relationtonormal -7.33” Skies:s-sunny,pc-partlycloudy,c-cloudy,sh-showers,t-thunderstorms,r-rain,sf-snowflurries,sn-snow,i-ice. Scan this QRcode withyourcell phonetoseethelatesthourlyforecast 12 Orlando Sentinel | Section 1 | Monday, October 4, 2021 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGCITYOFWINTERSPRINGS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE PLANNING &ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY AND CITY COMMISSION PROPOSE TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING: ORDINANCE 2021-08 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS,SEMINOLE COUNTY,FLORIDA,SETTING FORTH AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN,RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT BASED ON THE CITY’S EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PURSUANT TO SECTION 163.3191,FLORIDA STATUTES;PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF PRIOR INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS;INCORPORATION INTO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; LEGAL STATUS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS; SEVERABILITY;AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. PLANNING &ZONING BOARD /LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD ON THURSDAY,OCTOBER 14,2021 AT 5:30 P.M.OR SOON THEREAFTER IN THE COMMISSION CHAMBERS LOCATED AT WINTER SPRINGS CITY HALL 1126 EAST STATEROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS,FLORIDA CITY COMMISSION FIRST READING PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD ON MONDAY,NOVEMBER 8,2021 AT 6:30 P.M.OR SOON THEREAFTER IN THE COMMISSION CHAMBERS LOCATED AT WINTER SPRINGS CITY HALL 1126 EAST STATEROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS,FLORIDA THE CITY COMMISSION RESERVES THE RIGHT TO POSTPONE OR CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS ORDINANCE AT THIS MEETING WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE. The proposed ordinance may be obtained by interested parties between 8a.m.and 5p.m.,Monday through Friday,fromthe office of the City Clerk, located at 1126 E.SR 434,Winter Springs,Florida.For moreinformation, call (407)327-1800 #237.Persons with disabilities needing assistance to participate in any of these proceedings should contact the Employee Relations Department Coordinator,48hours in advance of the meeting at (407)327-1800,#236.This is apublic hearing.Interested parties are advised that they may appear at the meeting and be heardwith respect to the proposed ordinance.If you decide to appeal any recommendation or decision made by the City Commission with respect to any matter considered at this meeting,you will need arecordofthe proceedings,and for such purposes,you may need to ensurethat averbatim recordofthe proceedings is made upon which the appeal is based. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGCITYOFWINTERSPRINGS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THATTHEPLANNING&ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY AND CITY COMMISSIONPROPOSETOCONSIDERTHEFOLLOWING: ORDINANCE 2021-07 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS,SEMINOLE COUNTY,FLORIDA,SETTING FORTH AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVEPLAN,CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT BASED ON THE CITY’S EVALUATION AND APPRAISALOFTHECOMPREHENSIVEPLANPURSUANTTO SECTION 163.3191,FLORIDA STATUTES;PROVIDINGFORTHEREPEALOFPRIORINCONSISTENT ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS;INCORPORATIONINTOTHECOMPREHENSIVEPLAN;LEGAL STATUS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS;SEVERABILITY;AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. PLANNING &ZONING BOARD /LOCAL PLANNING AGENCYPUBLICHEARING WILL BE HELD ON THURSDAY,OCTOBER 14,2021 AT 5:30 P.M.OR SOON THEREAFTER IN THE COMMISSION CHAMBERS LOCATED AT WINTER SPRINGS CITY HALL 1126 EAST STATEROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS,FLORIDA CITY COMMISSION FIRST READING PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD ON MONDAY,NOVEMBER 8,2021 AT 6:30 P.M.OR SOON THEREAFTER IN THE COMMISSION CHAMBERS LOCATED AT WINTER SPRINGS CITY HALL 1126 EAST STATEROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS,FLORIDA THE CITY COMMISSION RESERVES THE RIGHT TO POSTPONE OR CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS ORDINANCE AT THIS MEETING WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE. The proposed ordinance may be obtained by interested parties between 8a.m.and 5p.m.,Monday through Friday,fromthe office of the City Clerk,located at 1126 E.SR 434,Winter Springs,Florida.For moreinformation,call (407)327-1800 #237.Persons with disabilities needing assistance to participate in any of these proceedings should contact the Employee Relations Department Coordinator,48hours in advance of the meeting at (407)327-1800,#236.This is apublic hearing.Interested parties areadvised that they may appear at the meeting and be heardwith respect to the proposed ordinance.If you decide to appeal any recommendation or decision made by the City Commission with respect to any matter considered at this meeting, you will need arecordofthe proceedings,and for such purposes, you may need to ensurethataverbatim recordofthe proceedings is made upon which the appeal is based. 114 REGULAR AGENDA ITEM 500 CITY COMMISSION AGENDA | NOVEMBER 8, 2021 REGULAR MEETING TITLE The 2021 Interlocal Agreement (ILA) for Public School Facility Planning and School Concurrency Presentation SUMMARY In 2007, as amended in 2008, an Interlocal Agreement (ILA) for Public Facility Planning and School Concurrency, pursuant to Florida Statue, was adopted by the Seminole County School Board, Seminole County Board of County Commissioners, and all of the City Commissions within Seminole County. The 2007/2008 Amended ILA is the version that the County, Cities, and School District operates under. In 2019, the Seminole County School Board requested that the ILA be amended in order to align it with the School Board policy. The presentation will include the current 2021 ILA version, approved (3-2) by the Seminole County Board of County Commissioners. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Commission review and provide comments related to the ILA presentation. 115 www.scps.us Seminole County Public Schools 2021 Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and School Concurrency November 8, 2021 Summary Presentation Prepared by Richard LeBlanc, AIA SCPS Director of Project Management and Facilities 1 116 www.scps.us Seminole County Public Schools 2 ILA Background: In 2005, the Florida Legislature enacted legislation to mandate a comprehensive approach to school facilities planning. Since the eight (8) municipalities have elected to apply school concurrency, it is required by State Law for the municipalities to participate in the coordination of public school facility planning with land use planning and development approvals. In 2007, as amended in 2008, an Interlocal Agreement (ILA) for Public School Facility Planning and School Concurrency, pursuant to Florida Statute, was adopted by the School Board, the Board of County Commissioners, and the City Commissions. The 2007/2008 Amended ILA is the version that the County, Cities and School District currently operates under. 117 www.scps.us Seminole County Public Schools 3 RECENT ACTIVITY In 2019, the School Board requested that the ILA be amended in order to align it with School Board policy. Throughout 2019 to 2021 the PTAC met 6 times, the PSFPC met 3 times, and there were various discussions between the legal representatives to provide amendment recommendations to the 2007/2008 Amended ILA. These changes resulted in the 2021 Interlocal Agreement. A Seminole County Board of County Commissioner (BOCC) worksession was held on January 12, 2021 where the ILA was presented to the BOCC by School District staff.At that worksession, the BOCC asked for additional clarification and amendments to the agreement. Based on discussion at the BOCC work sessions, and follow up meetings with the PTAC and PSFPC, the School Board prepared a version of the agreement that was presented to the BOCC on March 23, 2021 where the BOCC voted (3 to 2), to adopt the 2021 ILA with the change to Section 15.1 to read:This Agreement may be amended by written consent of no less than eighty- eight (88%) of all parties to this Agreement. The Agreement will remain in effect until amended in accordance with Florida Statutes.118 www.scps.us Seminole County Public Schools 4 RECENT ACTIVITY –CONT. Subsequent to the BOCC’s action on March 23, 2021, the PSFPC asked that the parties consider alternative language with regard to CSA configurations (Sec. 11.2), PSFPC oversight of concurrency (13.1A), and consent of parties (15.1)The County and representatives from SCPS further collaborated on revised language within these Sections and the revisions were presented to the participating City Managers on June 17, 2021 without objection. On July 13, 2021 the BOCC approved the 2021 Interlocal Agreement with the most recent changes reflected on Pages: 16 of 37; 17 of 37; 25 of 37 and 26 of 37. All other sections of the ILA remain as presented to the BOCC on March 23, 2021. To date the 2021 ILA has been approved by SCPS, Seminole County,City of Longwood,Lake Mary, Casselberry, Sanford, Oviedo, and the City of Altamonte Springs. 119 www.scps.us Seminole County Public Schools Benefits of School Concurrency •Seminole County’s growth has led to a growing demand for school facilities and capacity. School concurrency results in a cooperative and financially feasible process permitting the School Board to address existing school capacity and to provide adequate capacity for projected new growth. •It provides coordinated planning among Seminole County, the seven (7) cities and the school district to ensure that school capacity keeps pace with residential development. •It provides awareness of new residential development and its impact on public schools •It allows collaborative data gathering •It provides regulatory oversight/monitoring •It provides joint planning to meet future student growth 5 120 www.scps.us Seminole County Public Schools Pertinent Components of the 2021 ILA •Establishment of Committees –PTAC and PSFPC (Section 2) •Requires sharing of Information such as District’s Capital Improvement Budget, District’s Education Plant Survey and Five- Year Work Plan (Section 4 & 9) •Coordination of New school site selection (Section 5) •Provides a Process for the review of school closures (Section 5) •Provides a Process for the update of the County/Municipalities Comprehensive Plans (Section 10) •Contains the Elements and process of School Concurrency (Section 11 & 12) 6 121 www.scps.us Seminole County Public Schools Interlocal Agreement Timeline 7 PTAC PTAC PSFPC PTAC PTAC SCPS BOCC PTAC PTAC PSFPCPSFPC BOCC PSFPC/ PTAC SCPS 122 www.scps.us Seminole County Public Schools Previously Addressed Questions and Concerns 8 123 www.scps.us Seminole County Public Schools Where in the ILA does it give Land Use rights to the School Board? No land use rights are conveyed to the School District. Section 12 Uniform School Concurrency Process •12.1 A –No Site plan, final subdivision, or functional equivalent for new residential development may be approved by the County or Cities, unless the residential development is exempt from these requirements as provided in Section 12.1(c) of this Agreement, or until a SCALD has been issued by the School Board to the local government indicating that adequate facilities exist. •12.1 B –A local government may condition the approval of the residential development to ensure that necessary school facilities are in place. This shall not limit the authority of a local government to deny a site plan, final subdivision or its functional equivalent, pursuant to its home rule regulatory powers. Section 14.2 Land Use Authority •14.2 -The Parties specifically acknowledge that each Local Government is responsible for approving or denying comprehensive plan amendments and development approvals within its own jurisdiction. Nothing herein represents or authorizes a transfer of this authority to the School Board.9 124 www.scps.us Seminole County Public Schools Where in the ILA does it say the cities and/or county can force/impact school rezone? Section 11 School Concurrency Program •11.2 D –Any Party may propose a change to the CSA boundaries or the designation of which individual school attendance zones comprise to the CSAs. •11.2 E.1-Changes in school attendance zone boundaries shall be governed by School Board Policy po5120 –School Attendance Zones and Interzone Transfers, Section 120.54 F.S. and applicable uniform rules governing rulemaking and administrative proceedings. Prior to the School Board holding an initial public meeting to consider whether to begin the School Attendance Zone revision process, the School Board will notify the Local Government(s) with jurisdiction within the impacted CSA of the proposed revision. •11.2 E.4 –Concurrency Service Area geographic boundaries shall conform to revised school attendance zone boundaries and shall become effective upon final adoption of the modified school attendance zone boundaries by the School Board pursuant to School Board Policy po5120 –School Attendance Zones and Interzone Transfers, but shall not require amendment to this Agreement or to the local government jurisdiction’s comprehensive plan. 10 125 www.scps.us Seminole County Public Schools Why does the ILA need to be continuous? F.S. 163.3180 Concurrency •(i) When establishing concurrency requirements for public schools, a local government must enter into an interlocal agreement that satisfies the require in 163.3177(6((h)1. and 2. and 163.3177 and the requirements of this subsection F.S. 163.31777 Public Schools Interlocal Agreement •(1) The county and municipalities located within the geographic area of a school district shall enter into an interlocal agreement with the district school board which jointly establishes the specific ways in which the plans and processes of the district school board and the local government are to be coordinated. Local governments and the district school board in each school district are encouraged to adopt a single interlocal agreement to which all join as parties. Section 13 Oversight •13.1 A –The monitoring and evaluation of the school concurrency process is required pursuant to Section 162.3180(6)(i)4c, F.S., and Section 2 of this Agreement. The PSFPC shall be responsible for evaluating this Agreement and the effectiveness of the School Concurrency System. Commencing in 2025, upon completion of each periodic Seminole County Impact Fee Study Update pursuant to the Land Development Code of Seminole County, Chapter 105, “Education System Impact Fees”, the PSFPC shall evaluate the effectiveness of the CSAs for measuring LOS and consider making recommendations to this Agreement. The Failure of the PSFPC to initiate this review in a timely manner shall not affect the validity of this Agreement. 11 126 www.scps.us Seminole County Public Schools Why does Section 11.2 B.1. require a minimum of two elementary schools to a CSA? “In order to maximize school capacity, each elementary CSA must include a minimum of two elementary school; “ •This language is to prevent creating single CSAs for each elementary school. Single elementary CSAs would eliminate the ability to extend the reach of adjacencies. With a minimum of two school per CSA, it allows the reach of adjacencies to other schools that would be within the allotted bussing time limit (Section 12.3 C) •Setting a “maximum” number of schools would not be necessary because of the limit set by the bussing time restriction. •Any attempt to increase or decrease the number of schools within a CSA must be approved by all parties to the ILA (Section 11.2.E.5.b) 12 127 www.scps.us Seminole County Public Schools Why are there no maps in the 2021 ILA? •The designation of the specific school attendance zones comprising each of the CSAs are provided in Appendix “A”. (Sec. 11.2) The School Attendance Zone Maps continues to be available on the School Board web page. •Once the 2021 ILA has been approved by all parties the Attendance Zone Maps will be updated to show the CSA boundaries to reflect Appendix A. 13 128 www.scps.us Seminole County Public Schools In Summary •Since 2008 there has been a number of unsuccessful attempts at amending the ILA. •During these last 24 months a concerted efforts has been made by the PTAC, the PSFPC, representative attorneys, the School Board, the Board of County Commissioners, and City Managers in bringing forward a much improved Interlocal Agreement. •This presentation lists and hopefully answers a variety of questions/concerns. However, overall, the Agreement allows for periodic reviews (Sec. 13), and room for improvement and amendments as deemed appropriate by the Parties (Sec 15). End of Presentation 14 129 Page 1 of 37 2021 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND SCHOOL CONCURRENCY Seminole County, Florida THIS AGREEMENT is entered into with the Seminole County Board of County Commissioners (hereinafter referred to as the "County"), the Commission or Council of the Cities of Longwood, Altamonte Springs, Oviedo, Winter Springs, Lake Mary, Sanford, Casselberry (hereinafter referred to as the "Cities"), and the School Board of Seminole County (hereinafter referred to as the "School Board"), collectively referred to as the “Parties”. WHEREAS, the County, Cities and the School Board recognize their mutual obligation and responsibility for the education, nurturing and general well-being of the children within their community; and WHEREAS, the County, Cities and the School Board are authorized to enter into this Agreement pursuant to Section 163.01, Section 163.3177(6)(h)2 and Section 1013.33, Florida Statutes (F.S.); and WHEREAS, the County, Cities, and School Board recognize the following benefits to the citizens and students of their communities by more closely coordinating their comprehensive land use and school facilities planning programs: (1) better coordination of the timing and location of new schools with land development, (2) greater efficiency for the school board and local governments by siting schools to take advantage of existing and planned roads, water, sewer, and parks, (3) improved student access and safety by coordinating the construction of new and expanded schools with the road and sidewalk construction programs of the local governments, (4) better designed urban form by locating and designing schools to serve as community focal points, (5) greater efficiency and convenience by co-locating schools with parks, ball fields, libraries, and other community facilities to take advantage of joint use opportunities, and (6) reduction of the factors that contribute to urban sprawl and support of existing neighborhoods by appropriately locating new schools and expanding and renovating existing schools; and WHEREAS, the County, Cities and School Board have determined that it is necessary and appropriate for the entities to cooperate with each other to provide adequate public school facilities in a timely manner and at appropriate locations, to eliminate any deficit of permanent student stations, and to provide capacity for projected new growth; and WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to structure Concurrency Service Areas so as to reduce student transportation costs, minimize student transportation times, and maximize current and future student capacity at schools in close proximity to actual and projected population of school age children, while still respecting opportunities for land development in Seminole County; and WHEREAS, Section 1013.33(4), F.S., requires that the location of public educational facilities must be consistent with the comprehensive plan and implementing land development regulations of the appropriate local governing body; and 130 Page 2 of 37 WHEREAS, Sections 163.3177(6)(h)1 and 2, F.S., require each local government to adopt an intergovernmental coordination element as part of their comprehensive plan that states principles and guidelines to be used in the accomplishment of coordination of the adopted comprehensive plan with the plans of the school boards, and describes the processes for collaborative planning and decision making on population projections and public school siting; and WHEREAS, Sections 163.31777 and 1013.33, F.S., require the County, Cities and School Board to establish jointly the specific ways in which the plans and processes of the School Board and the local governments are to be coordinated; and WHEREAS, Section 163.3180(6)(a) F.S. requires local governments that choose to apply concurrency to public education facilities to include principles, guidelines, standards, and strategies, including adopted levels of service, in their comprehensive plans and interlocal agreements; and WHEREAS the local government signatories to this Agreement have chosen to apply concurrency to public education facilities; and WHEREAS, the County and Cities are entering into this Agreement in reliance on the School Board’s obligation to prepare, adopt and implement a financially feasible capital facilities program to achieve public schools operating at the adopted level of service consistent with the timing specified in the School Board’s Capital Facilities Plan, and the School Board’s further commitment to update the plan annually to address projected growth in order to maintain the adopted level of service and to demonstrate that the utilization of school capacity is maximized to the greatest extent possible pursuant to Section 163.3180(6)(f)2, F.S.; and WHEREAS, the School Board, is entering into this Agreement in reliance on the County and Cities’ obligation to adopt amendments to their local comprehensive plans to impose optional School Concurrency as provided in Sections 163.3180(1)(a) and 163.3180(6)(a), F.S.; and NOW THEREFORE, be it mutually agreed among the School Board, the County and the Cities (hereinafter referred to collectively as the “Parties”) that the following definitions and procedures will be followed in coordinating land use, public school facilities planning, and school concurrency. 131 Page 3 of 37 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND SCHOOL CONCURRENCY TBD Seminole County, Florida Table of Contents SECTION 1 DEFINITIONS .......................................................................................... 5 SECTION 2 COMMITTEES AND DUTIES ................................................................... 8 2.1 Planning Technical Advisory Committee (PTAC) ................................................. 8 2.2 Public Schools Facilities Planning Committee (PSFPC) ...................................... 8 SECTION 3 STUDENT ENROLLMENT AND POPULATION PROJECTIONS............ 9 3.1 Population and Student Enrollment Projections Distributed Annually ................... 9 3.2 Student Projections .............................................................................................. 9 SECTION 4 COORDINATING AND SHARING OF INFORMATION ........................... 9 4.1 School Board Educational Facilities Work Plan .................................................... 9 4.2 Educational Plant Survey ..................................................................................... 9 SECTION 5 SCHOOL SITE SELECTION, REMODELING, AND SCHOOL CLOSURES ......... 10 5.1 New School Sites............................................................................................... 10 5.2 School site Plan Review .................................................................................... 10 5.3 Remodeling and Closures .................................................................................. 10 5.4 Joint Consideration of On-Site and Off-Site Improvements ................................ 11 5.5 Expansion, Renovation, or Construction ............................................................ 11 SECTION 6 LOCAL PLANNING AGENCIES (LPA), COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS, REZONINGS, AND DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS ......................................... 11 6.1 Appointed LPA Members ................................................................................... 11 6.2 County and City Development Applications Shared with the School Board ........ 11 6.3 Criteria for Evaluating Residential Development Applications ............................ 11 6.4 Formulating City and County Plans and Programs ............................................. 12 SECTION 7 CO-LOCATION AND SHARED USE ..................................................... 12 7.1 Co-Location and Shared Use ............................................................................. 12 7.2 Mutual Use Agreement ...................................................................................... 12 SECTION 8 SPECIFIC RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARTIES .............................. 13 8.1 Specific Responsibilities of the County and Cities .............................................. 13 8.2 Specific Responsibilities of the School Board .................................................... 13 SECTION 9 SCHOOL BOARD CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ............................ 14 9.1 School Board’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan ......................................... 14 9.2 Educational Facilities Work Plan ........................................................................ 15 9.3 Transmittal ......................................................................................................... 15 9.4 Adoption ............................................................................................................ 15 132 Page 4 of 37 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND SCHOOL CONCURRENCY TBD Seminole County, Florida Table of Contents continued SECTION 10 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ELEMENTS ................................................. 15 10.1 Required Comprehensive Plan Amendments .................................................... 15 10.2 Development, Adoption, and Amendment of the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) .................................................................................................... 15 SECTION 11 SCHOOL CONCURRENCY PROGRAM ............................................... 16 11.1 Commencement of School Concurrency ............................................................ 16 11.2 Concurrency Service Areas (CSA) ..................................................................... 16 11.3 Level of Service (LOS) ....................................................................................... 17 11.4 School Concurrency Regulations ....................................................................... 17 SECTION 12 UNIFORM SCHOOL CONCURRENCY PROCESS ............................... 18 12.1 General Provisions ............................................................................................ 18 12.2 School Concurrency Application Review ............................................................ 19 12.3 Methodology ...................................................................................................... 20 12.4 Development Review Table ............................................................................... 21 12.5 Development Agreement for Mitigation .............................................................. 22 12.6 School Concurrency Approval ........................................................................... 24 12.7 Reserved Capacity ............................................................................................ 24 12.8 Appeal Process …………………………………………..……………………………25 SECTION 13 OVERSIGHT .......................................................................................... 25 13.1 Oversight ........................................................................................................... 25 SECTION 14 SPECIAL PROVISION ........................................................................... 26 14.1 School Board Requirements .............................................................................. 26 14.2 Land Use Authority ............................................................................................ 26 SECTION 15 AMENDMENT PROCESS, NOTICE, AND TERM OF AGREEMENT .... 26 15.1 Amendment of the Agreement ........................................................................... 26 15.2 Notice Requirements ......................................................................................... 26 15.3 Repeal of the Agreement ................................................................................... 27 15.4 Termination of the Agreement ........................................................................... 27 15.5 Withdrawal ......................................................................................................... 27 SECTION 16 RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES ............................................................... 27 16.1 Dispute Resolution ............................................................................................. 27 SECTION 17 EXECUTION IN COUNTERPARTS ....................................................... 27 17.1 Agreement Execution ........................................................................................ 27 SECTION 18 SUCCESSION OF AGREEMENT .......................................................... 27 18.1 Succession of Agreement .................................................................................. 27 SECTION 19 EFFECTIVE DATE ................................................................................. 27 19.1 Effective Date ………………………………………………………………………….27 APPENDIX “A” Concurrency Service Areas (CSA)………………………………37 133 Page 5 of 37 SECTION 1 DEFINITIONS Adjacent Concurrency Service Area: A concurrency service area which is contiguous and touches the boundary of another concurrency service area along one side. Attendance Zone: The geographic area in which all resident students are assigned to a specific school or region school. Building Permit: An approval by a local government authorizing residential construction on a specific property. Capital Outlay, Full Time Equivalent (COFTE) Projections: Florida Department of Education (FDOE) COHORT student enrollment projections for Florida public school districts, issued annually and based on information produced by the demographic, revenue, and education estimating conferences pursuant to s. 216.136 and s. 1013.64(3) F.S, as adjusted by the FDOE Office of Educational Facilities. Charter School: Public schools of choice which operate under a performance contract, or a “charter,” in accordance with Section 1002.33, F.S. Charter schools in the Seminole County Public School District are Countywide schools of choice and do not have a specified capacity as defined in Rule 6A-2.0010 F.A.C., State Requirements for Educational Facilities 2014 (“SREF”) and FISH. Charter schools are not included in concurrency or enrollment calculations. Cities: All municipalities in Seminole County Comprehensive Plan: A plan that meets the requirements of Sections 163.3177 F.S. Concurrency Service Area (CSA): A geographic unit promulgated by the School Board and adopted by local governments within which the level of service is measured when an application for residential development is reviewed for school concurrency purposes. Consistency: Compatible with and furthering the goals, objectives and policies of the County and Cities Comprehensive Plan Elements and this Agreement. Core Facilities: The media center kitchen/cafeteria, multi-purpose, toilet facilities, administration, gymnasiums, auditoriums, and circulation space of an educational facility. Days: All references to “days” or “day” mean calendar days unless specifically noted otherwise. Developer: Any person, including a governmental agency, undertaking any residential construction. Development Agreement for Mitigation: A developer improvement or contribution identified in a binding and enforceable agreement between the Developer, the School Board and the local government with jurisdiction over the approval of the development approval to provide mitigation proportionate to the demand for public school facilities to be created by actual development of the property, as set forth in Section 163.3180(6)(h)2 F.S Development Approval: Site plan, final subdivision or functional equivalent, issued by a local government granting, or granting with conditions, a Development Application. Educational Facilities Impact Fee: A fee designated to assist in the funding for acquisition and development of school facilities, owned and operated by the School Board, needed to serve new growth and development. Educational Facilities Work Plan: The School Board’s annual capital planning document that includes long-range planning for facilities needs over 5-year and 10-year periods. 134 Page 6 of 37 Educational Facility: The buildings, equipment, structures, ancillary, site improvements, and special educational use areas that are built, installed or established to serve public educational purposes. Educational Plant Survey: A systematic study approved by the Florida Department of Education (FDOE) of present educational and ancillary plants and the determination of future needs to provide an appropriate educational program and services for each student based on projected capital outlay FTE (COFTE) counts prepared and issued by the FDOE. Fall Semester Student Count: The fall semester student count (Second Survey) of all “full-time equivalent” students, pursuant to Chapter 1011.62, F.S. Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan: The School Board’s annually adopted financially feasible, five-year list of capital improvements which address student capacity to achieve and maintain the adopted level of service. Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH): Data, inventory and numbering system used by the Florida Department of Education, Office of Educational Facilities for parcels of land, buildings and rooms in public educational facilities to include permanent and portable student stations (hereinafter referred to as "FISH). Level of Service Standard (LOS): ): A standard or condition established by the School District to measure utilization within a concurrency service area. Current Level of Service is determined by the sum of the Fall Semester Student Count at the same type of schools within a concurrency service area, divided by the sum of the Program School Capacity of the same type of schools within a concurrency service area Local Governments: Seminole County and its Cities. Modular Classroom: A room designated in FISH within an educational facility which contains student stations and where students receive instruction and which, the life expectancy of the structure, also as designated in FISH is 35 - 49 years. Modular classrooms generally consist of pre-manufactured concrete and/or steel type structures owned by the School Board. Permanent Classroom: A room designated in FISH within an educational facility which contains student stations and where students receive instruction and which, the life expectancy of the structure, also as designated in FISH, is 50 years or more. Permanent Student Station: A designated space contained within a permanent building or structure that can accommodate a student for an instructional program and is designated satisfactory in FISH data. The total number of permanent student stations at an educational facility is determined by the sum of individual permanent student stations at the facility. Permanent buildings or structure types are designated by the School Board and include permanently constructed buildings having a life expectancy of 50 years or more and modular buildings as identified in FISH, having a life expectancy exceeding 35 – 49 years Planning Technical Advisory Committee (PTAC): This committee is comprised of planning staff representatives from Seminole County, each of the seven municipal corporations within the County, and the Seminole County School Board. PTAC serves as an advisory committee and working group to enhance intergovernmental coordination of comprehensive plan programs and assists in ensuring consistency between these programs and issues of multi-jurisdictional concern. Program School Capacity: The optimal number of students that can be housed for instruction at an educational facility as prescribed in School Board Policy po5120 – School 135 Page 7 of 37 Attendance Zones and Interzone Transfers in permanent, modular, and temporary type classroom spaces designated in FISH. A. Program School Capacity of an elementary school is 95% of the sum of student stations assigned to permanent, modular, and temporary classrooms at the school. B. Program School Capacity of a middle school is 90% of the sum of student stations assigned to permanent, modular, and temporary classrooms at the school. C. Program School Capacity of high schools is less than the sum of student stations assigned to permanent and modular classrooms at the school. The amount less is prescribed in School Board Policy po5120 – School Attendance Zones and Interzone Transfers and Rule 6A-2.0010 F.A.C., State Requirements for Educational Facilities. increase in the total number of housing units. Public School Concurrency Program: A program established by Seminole County, each of the seven municipal corporations within the County, and the Seminole County School Board to meet the requirements of Sections 163.31777, 163.3180, and 1013.33 F.S. Public Schools Facilities Planning Committee (PSFPC): The PSFPC is created and established by this agreement. This committee is comprised of one elected official, or their designee, from Seminole County, each of the seven municipal corporations within the County, and the Seminole County School Board. The PSFPC is responsible for the oversight of the school concurrency program established in this agreement and hears recommendations from PTAC on school planning issues and may make recommendations to the School Board. Reserved Capacity: School capacity that is assigned to a proposed project once it has received a SCALD approval for the project’s SCALD Application. Residential Development: Any development that is comprised of dwelling units, in whole or in part, for permanent human habitation. School Board: The governing body established under Article IX, Section 4, of the Florida Constitution. School Capacity Availability Letter of Determination (SCALD): A letter prepared by the School Board of Seminole County, identifying if school capacity is available to serve a residential project., and if capacity exists, advising that capacity has been reserved. School Capacity: See Program School Capacity School District: The School District of Seminole County is created pursuant to Article IX, Section 4, of the Florida Constitution. School Impact Analysis (SCALD Application): A formal description of a residential project subject to school concurrency review provided by the developer for School Board review in accordance with Section 12 of this Agreement. School Year: Means the period from July 1 to June 30. 136 Page 8 of 37 Student Station: A satisfactory space contained within a building or structure as designated in FISH that can accommodate a student for an instructional program. Temporary Classroom: Also referred to as a relocatable or portable classroom. A room designated in FISH within an educational facility which contains student stations and where students receive instruction and which, the life expectancy of the structure, also as designated in FISH, is less than 35 years. Temporary classrooms generally consist of mobile trailer structures or transportable wood frame type structures. Student stations in temporary classrooms shall not be considered for the purposes of determining concurrency or included in any capacity determination of any CSA. Type of School: An educational facility providing the same grade level of education, i.e.: elementary (grades PK-5), middle (grades 6-8), or high school (grades 9-12) or special purpose school such as magnet school. Utilization: The comparison of the total number of students enrolled to the total number of Program School Capacity as determined by School Board Policy po5120 – School Attendance Zones and Interzone Transfers. SECTION 2 COMMITTEES AND DUTIES 2.1 Planning Technical Advisory Committee (PTAC). PTAC will meet, at a minimum on a semi-annual basis, in the first and third quarter of the school year, to discuss issues and formulate recommendations to the PSFPC regarding coordination of land use and school facilities planning, including such issues as population and student projections, development trends, school needs, co-location and joint use opportunities, ancillary infrastructure improvements needed to support the schools, School Board Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan and the Public School Concurrency Program. A designee of the School Board shall be responsible for coordinating and convening the semi-annual meeting. 2.2 Public Schools Facilities Planning Committee (PSFPC). The Parties hereby establish a Public Schools Facilities Planning Committee for the purpose of reviewing recommendations from PTAC on land use and school facilities planning, including such issues as population and student projections, development trends, school needs, co-location and joint use opportunities, ancillary infrastructure improvements needed to support the school, potential sites for new schools, and proposals for significant renovation and potential closure of existing schools. Based on the review of PTAC’s recommendations, the PSFPC will submit recommendations to the School Board. Additionally, the PSFPC will be a standing committee to review the School Board Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan in accordance with Sections 4.1 and 10 of this Agreement, and serve as the required oversight committee for the Public School Concurrency Program as detailed in Section 13 of this Agreement. The PSFPC will meet annually to hear reports, discuss policy, set direction, and reach understandings concerning issues of mutual concern regarding coordination of land use and school facilities planning, including population and student growth, development trends, school needs, off-site improvements, joint use opportunities, and school concurrency. SECTION 3 STUDENT ENROLLMENT AND POPULATION PROJECTIONS 137 Page 9 of 37 3.1 Population and Student Enrollment Projections Distributed Annually. In fulfillment of their respective planning duties, the County, Cities, and School Board agree to coordinate and base their plans upon consistent projections of the amount, type, and distribution of population growth and student enrollment. At the annual first quarter PTAC meeting described at Subsection 2.1, the County and Cities shall provide updated five-year population projections and the School Board will supply the annually updated student enrollment projections. 3.2 Student Projections. The Parties agree to use student population projections based on Capital Outlay Full Time Equivalent (COFTE) cohort projections issued by FDOE in first quarter of each school year. SECTION 4 COORDINATING AND SHARING OF INFORMATION 4.1 School Board Educational Facilities Work Plan. During the first quarter of each school year, the School Board shall submit to the County, each City and the Public Schools Facilities Planning Committee (PSFPC) the School Board Educational Facilities Work Plan prior to adoption by the Board. A. The Plan will be consistent with the requirements of Section 1013.35, F.S., and include projected student populations apportioned geographically, an inventory of existing school facilities, projections of facility space needs, information on relocatable or portable classrooms, general locations of new schools for the 5- and 10-year time periods. B. The Plan will also include the financially feasible School Board Capital Improvement Plan for a 5-year period. The Cities and County shall review the plan and provide written comments to the School Board annually -within twenty (20) days of receipt of the 5 Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). 4.2 Educational Plant Survey. PTAC will assist the School Board in an advisory capacity in the preparation and update of the Educational Plant Survey. The Educational Plant Survey shall be consistent with the requirements of Section 1013.33, F.S. Upon receipt of the Educational Plant Survey, PTAC will have twenty (20) days to evaluate and make recommendations regarding the location and need for new schools, significant renovation or expansion, and closures of educational facilities, and the consistency of such plans with the local government comprehensive plan and relevant issues listed in Subsections 5.2, 5.3, 6.1, and 8.1 of this Agreement. SECTION 5 SCHOOL SITE SELECTION, REMODELING, AND SCHOOL CLOSURES 5.1 New School Sites. When the need for a new school is identified in the School Board’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan, PTAC will review a list of potential sites in the area of need. Potential sites for new schools will be submitted to the local government with jurisdiction for an assessment regarding consistency with the local government Comprehensive Plan. This jurisdiction shall have 20 days upon receipt of the request to respond with a consistency determination. If the site is consistent with the local government comprehensive plan, and the School Board authorizes the acquisition of the property, the School Board shall proceed through the appropriate site plan review process. If a determination is made that a 138 Page 10 of 37 proposed school site is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the local government shall identify whether it will support necessary amendments to the comprehensive plan to make the school site consistent. The coordination process shall be in accordance with Chapter 1013.33 F.S. 5.2 School Site Plan Review. Once a school site has been selected and site design has begun, the School Board shall comply with the appropriate site plan review process set forth within the applicable land development regulations. Nothing in this agreement exempts school sites from the site plan review process and ensuring the site plan is consistent with both the comprehensive plan and land development regulations. Standards and conditions shall not be imposed which conflict with the requirements established in Chapter 1013 F.S. or the Florida Building Code, unless otherwise agreed to by the School Board as a part of this Agreement. A. The School Board shall not be required to obtain or condemn public right- of-way from private property owners for the purposes of constructing off- site infrastructure of which it is intended that fee simple title of the acquired right-of-way be transferred to the County or City. B. The County and Cities shall exempt the School Board from the payment of planning and development fees, including but not limited to plan amendment fees, zoning and/or site plan fees, special exception fees, right-of-way utilization fees, permit fees, subdivision fees, and vacate fees, as may be required by the County or Cities in the development review process. The School Board shall be responsible for the payment of fees associated with advertising related public hearings. C. The County and Cities shall accept the St. Johns River Water Management District permit for an educational facility to find that storm water collection, treatment, retention and drainage within a school site is sufficient. If off- site impacts are present, the County or City having jurisdiction may impose conditions on the application as provided in the jurisdiction’s land development regulations. 5.3 Remodeling and Closures. When the need for a remodeling project that changes the primary use of a facility, resulting in a greater than 15 percent increase or decrease in student capacity, or the closure of a school has been identified in the School Board Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan, PTAC shall notify the PSFPC and make recommendations on the impacts the renovation or closure will have on the adopted level of service for schools. If a 5% or greater reduction of capacity is proposed for a High School, the local government(s) with jurisdiction within the impacted CSA will be notified. 5.4 Joint Consideration of Off-Site Improvements. In conjunction with the land use consistency determination described in Subsection 5.1 of this Agreement, the School Board and the effected local government will jointly determine the need for and timing of off-site improvements necessary to support each new school or the proposed remodeling of an existing school. The School Board and the effected local government will agree to the timing, location, and the party or parties responsible for financing constructing, operating and maintaining the required improvements. 139 Page 11 of 37 5.5 Expansion, Renovation, or Construction. When there is to be an expansion of an existing school site, or renovation or construction on an existing site, the School Board and the applicable local government shall follow the coordination requirements set forth by law, including, but not limited to Section 1013, F.S. SECTION 6 LOCAL PLANNING AGENCIES (LPA), COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS, REZONINGS, AND DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS 6.1 Appointed LPA Members. Pursuant to Section 163.3174, Florida Statutes, The County and Cities will include School Board representative on the local planning agencies, or equivalent agencies, to attend those meetings at which the agendas consider comprehensive plan amendments and rezonings that would, if approved, increase residential density on the property that is the subject of the application. The Cities and County may at their discretion grant voting status to the appointed School Board representative. 6.2 County and City Development Applications Shared with the School Board. The County and the Cities shall give the District Superintendent notification of land use applications and development proposals pending before them that may affect student enrollment, enrollment projections, or school facilities in accordance with Section 12 of this Agreement. Such notice will be provided within 10 days with receipt of the application. This notice requirement applies to amendments to the comprehensive plan future land use map, rezonings, developments of regional impact, and/or major residential or mixed-use development projects. 6.3 Criteria for Evaluating Residential Development Applications. The County and Cities will consider the following issues, in addition to the review process for school concurrency described in Section 12, when reviewing Comprehensive Plan amendments and rezonings for residential development proposals: A. School Board comments on residential development proposals. B. The provision of school sites and facilities within neighborhoods. C. The compatibility of land uses adjacent to existing schools and reserved school sites. D. The co-location of parks, recreation and neighborhood facilities with school sites. E. The linkage of schools, parks, libraries and other public facilities with bikeways, trails, and sidewalks for safe access. 6.4 Formulating City and County Plans and Programs. In formulating community development plans and programs, the County and Cities will consider the following issues: A. Scheduling of capital improvements that are coordinated with and meet the capital needs identified in the School Board’s Five–Year Capital Improvement Plan. B. Providing incentives to the private sector to identify and implement creative solutions to developing adequate school facilities in residential developments. 140 Page 12 of 37 C. Targeting community development improvements in older and distressed neighborhoods near schools; and D. Working to address and resolve multi-jurisdictional public-school issues. SECTION 7 CO-LOCATION AND SHARED USE 7.1 Co-Location and Shared Use. The co-location and shared use of facilities are important to both the School Board and local governments. Pursuant to Section 163.31777(2)(g), F.S., the School Board will seek opportunities to co-locate and share use of school facilities and civic facilities when preparing the Board’s Five– Year Capital Improvement Plan. Likewise, co-location and shared use opportunities will be considered by the local governments when preparing the annual update to the Comprehensive Plan's schedule of capital improvements and when planning and designing new, or renovating existing, community facilities. Opportunities for co-location and shared use with public schools will be considered for the following: A. Libraries; B. Parks and recreation facilities; C. Community centers; D. Auditoriums; E. Learning centers; F. Museums; G. Performing arts centers; H. Stadiums; and I. Governmental facilities. 7.2 Mutual Use Agreement. For each instance of co-location and shared use, the School Board and local government shall enter into a separate agreement which addresses liability, operating and maintenance costs, scheduling of use, and facility supervision or any other issues that may arise from co-location and shared use. SECTION 8 SPECIFIC RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARTIES 8.1 Specific Responsibilities of the County and Cities. When the Comprehensive Plan amendments adopted in accordance with this Agreement become effective, the County and Cities shall undertake the following activities: A. Adopt the required school concurrency provisions into their Land Development Regulations (LDR) consistent with the time frame established by law, the requirements of this Agreement, and the County and Cities’ Comprehensive Plans, unless electing to be bound by the provisions established by the County. 141 Page 13 of 37 B. Withhold the approval of any site plan, final subdivision, or functional equivalent for new residential units not exempted under Section 12.1(c) of this Agreement, until the School Board has reported that there is school capacity available or a Development Agreement for Mitigation has been reached. C. Share information with the School Board regarding population projections, projections of development and redevelopment for the coming year, infrastructure required to support educational facilities, and amendments to future land use plan elements consistent with the requirements of this Agreement. D. Maintain data for approved new residential development. The data shall be provided to the School Board annually by October 15th, and include at a minimum, the following: 1. Development name and location. 2. Total number of dwelling units by unit type as defined in the most recently adopted public schools impact fee ordinance. 3. Impact fee tabulation as provided by the County. 4. Total number of dwelling units with certificates of occupancy (CO) by Development by date. E. Transmit site plans, final subdivision or functional equivalency for approved new residential development upon request by the School Board. 8.2 Specific Responsibilities of the School Board. By entering into this Agreement, the School Board agrees to undertake the following activities: A. Annually prepare and update a Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan to meet the anticipated demand for student stations identified by the COFTE. B. Consider school attendance boundary adjustments as may be appropriate to maximize the utilization of capacity in order to ensure that all schools of each type (elementary, middle, high) in each Concurrency Service Area and each individual school operate at the adopted level of service, consistent with the requirements of this Agreement and School Board Policy po5120 – School Attendance Zones and Interzone Transfers. Initiation of attendance boundaries shall be at the sole discretion of the School Board. C. Plan capacity enhancing and remodeling projects necessary to maintain the adopted level of service consistent with the Five-Year CIP. D. Provide the County and Cities with the required data and analysis updated annually to support the comprehensive plan elements and any amendments relating to school concurrency. E. Adopt a five- and ten-year CIP consistent with the requirements of this Agreement. F. Review proposed new residential developments for compliance with concurrency standards, consistent with the requirements of this Agreement. 142 Page 14 of 37 G. Consider and approve Development Agreement for Mitigation options for new residential development as appropriate. H. Prepare annual reports on enrollment and capacity, consistent with the requirements of this Agreement. I. Provide necessary staff and material support for meetings of the PSFPC as required by this Agreement. J. Provide information to the County and Cities regarding enrollment projections, school siting, infrastructure necessary to support educational facilities, and amendments to future land use plan elements consistent with the requirements of this Agreement. SECTION 9 SCHOOL BOARD CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 9.1 School Board’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan. In preparation of the School Board’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan and each annual update, the School Board shall undertake the following: A. Update and adopt the School Board’s Five–Year Capital Improvement Plan for public schools in Seminole County on or before September 30th of each year. B. Specify all new construction, remodeling or renovation projects which will add permanent capacity or modernize existing facilities. C. Prepare the School Board’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan and each annual update to provide a financially feasible program of school construction for a five (5) year period. 1. Include school construction projects which, when completed, will add sufficient capacity to achieve and maintain the adopted LOS standard for all schools based on the projected COFTE enrollment; provide for required modernizations; and satisfy the School Board’s constitutional obligation to provide a uniform system of free public schools on a county-wide basis. 2. Include a description of each school project, in the School Board’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan. D. Maximize utilization of existing schools so that proposed projects add the necessary capacity to maintain the adopted Level of Service standard. E. The School Board’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan and each annual update shall consider the projected enrollment, capacity and utilization percentage of all schools. 9.2 Educational Facilities Work Plan. In addition to the adopted School Board’s Five- Year Capital Improvement Plan, the School Board shall annually adopt a five-year and ten-year work plan based upon revenue projections, COFTE enrollment projections and facility needs for the five-year and ten-year period. It is recognized that the projections in the five- and ten-year time frames are tentative and should be used only for general planning purposes. Upon completion, the Educational Facilities Work Plan will be transmitted to the local governments. 143 Page 15 of 37 9.3 Transmittal. The School Board shall transmit to the County, the local governments and the PSFPC copies of the proposed Educational Facilities Work Plan and the Five-Year CIP for review and comment. Transmittal to the PSFPC, the Cities and the County shall occur during first quarter of each school year commencing after the effective date of this Agreement. 9.4 Adoption. Unless the adoption is delayed by mediation, delayed receipt of data from FDOE, or a lawful challenge, the School Board shall adopt their Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan no later than September 30th, and it shall become effective no later than October 1st of each year. SECTION 10 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ELEMENTS 10.1 Required Comprehensive Plan Amendments. The County and the Cities agree to adopt the following Comprehensive Plan amendments no later than ten (10) calendar months following the effective date of this Agreement. A. An amended Capital Improvement Element (CIE) that includes the portion of the adopted School Board’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan dealing with capacity improvements. The amended information will be adopted by the local jurisdictions no later than December 31st following the annual adoption of the Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan by the School Board. This will ensure that the CIE uniformly sets forth a financially feasible public school capital facilities program, consistent with the adopted Level of Service standards for public schools. B. A Public School Facilities Element (PSFE) consistent with the requirements of Section 163.3180(6) F.S. and this Agreement. C. An amended Intergovernmental Coordination Element as required by Section 163.3177(6)(h)1 and 2 F.S. and this Agreement. D. Each jurisdiction’s amendments shall be consistent with this Agreement, and those adopted by the other jurisdictions as required by Section 163.3180, F.S. 10.2 Development, Adoption, and Amendment of the Capital Improvements Element (CIE). An annual update or any amendment to the School Board’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan by the School Board, once adopted by the School Board, shall be transmitted to the County and the Cities. The County and the Cities shall adopt the capacity portions of the School Board’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan into the Capital Improvement Element of their Comprehensive Plans. A. The County and the Cities, by adopting the capacity portions of “The Seminole County Public School’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan” in the Capital Improvements Element of the Local Government’s Comprehensive Plan, shall have neither the obligation nor the responsibility for funding or accomplishing the School Board Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan. SECTION 11 SCHOOL CONCURRENCY PROGRAM 144 Page 16 of 37 11.1 Commencement of School Concurrency. The School Concurrency Program described in this Agreement shall commence on the EFFECTIVE DATE. 11.2 Concurrency Service Areas (CSA). The Parties hereby agree that School Concurrency shall be measured and applied using a geographic area known as a Concurrency Service Area (CSA) which coincides with groupings of school attendance zones within each school type based on adjacency, as established in this Agreement. The designation of the specific school attendance zones comprising each of the CSAs are provided in Appendix “A” of this Agreement. A. CSA service area boundaries, together with the standards for establishing those boundaries, will be identified in the Comprehensive Plans of each City and the County pursuant to Section 163.3180(6)(f)2.a., F.S. The designation of the specific school attendance zones comprising each of the CSAs will be included as support documents used as a basis for or in developing the local comprehensive plan . The comprehensive plan will include a statement advising that in order to determine the geographic boundary of each CSA, current School Board attendance zone maps for each school included within each CSA must be consulted. B. The following standards shall apply to the composition of CSAs: 1. In Order to maximize school capacity, each elementary CSA must include a minimum of two elementary schools: and 2. When a new elementary school opens it may be placed in the CSA that includes the most proximate existing elementary school with consideration of the goals established in School Board Policy po5120 to include, but not be limited to, minimizing the duration of travel time and distance while not placing a transportation burden on any identifiable diversity sub group (social economic, race/ethnicity, ESOL, or disability): and 3. The capacity at county-wide Magnet Schools shall not be attributed to the available capacity for the CSA in which the county wide Magnet School is located. C. As future school attendance zone changes are required for schools programmed in the Seminole School Board Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan, the CSAs shall automatically be modified to the greatest extent possible so as to provide maximum utilization. D. Any Party may propose a change to the CSA boundaries or the designation of which individual school attendance zones comprise the CSAs. Prior to adopting any change to a CSA, the School Board must verify that as a result of the change: 1. The adopted level of service standards will be achieved and maintained for each year of the five-year planning period; and 2. The utilization of Program School Capacity will be maximized to the greatest extent possible, taking into account transportation costs, and other relevant factors. E. The Parties shall observe the following process for modifying CSA School Designations: 145 Page 17 of 37 1. Changes in school attendance zone boundaries shall be governed by School Board Policy po5120 – School Attendance Zones and Interzone Transfers, Section 120.54 F.S. and applicable uniform rules governing rulemaking and administrative proceedings. Prior to the School Board holding an initial public meeting to consider whether to begin the School Attendance Zone revision process, the School Board will notify the Local Government(s) with jurisdiction within the impacted CSA of the proposed revision. 2. At such time as the School Board determines that modification to a school(s) attendance zone boundary is appropriate, the School Board shall make public the revised attendance zone boundary and shall provide notice of the proposed changes to the Cities, to the County, and to the PSFPC. 3. Not Used. 4. Concurrency Service Area geographic boundaries shall conform to revised school attendance zone boundaries and shall become effective upon final adoption of the modified school attendance zone boundaries by the School Board pursuant to School Board Policy po5120 – School Attendance Zones and Interzone Transfers, but shall not require amendment to this Agreement or to the local government jurisdiction’s comprehensive plan. 5. To become effective, any proposed change to CSA boundaries that: a. is not a CSA boundary change resulting from a School Board modification to school attendance zone geographic boundaries pursuant to School Board Policy po5120 – School Attendance Zones and Interzone Transfers; or b. is a proposed change to the designation of which individual school attendance zones comprise the various CSAs, must be reviewed by the PTAC, the PSFPC, and approved by all Parties as an amendment to this Agreement. 11.3 Level of Service (LOS) Standard. To ensure the capacity of schools is sufficient to support student growth, the County, Cities and School Board shall adopt a LOS standard for schools. The Parties hereby agree that the maximum LOS standard shall be the Program School Capacity for each school type within each CSA. 11.4 School Concurrency Regulations. Each Local Government shall adopt school concurrency provisions into its land development regulations (LDRs) consistent with the requirements of this Agreement. A. The County and the Cities shall amend their LDRs to adopt school concurrency provisions for the review of development approvals. 1. In the event that any participating City does not adopt LDRs within 18 months, that government shall be deemed to have “opted in” to the County regulations and agrees to be bound by the terms and provisions therein until it adopts its own ordinance. 146 Page 18 of 37 2. At any time, any Local Government may opt out of the County’s implementing ordinance through implementing its own ordinance. SECTION 12 UNIFORM SCHOOL CONCURRENCY PROCESS 12.1 General Provisions. The County, the Cities and the School Board shall ensure that the Level of Service Standard established for each school type is maintained. A. No site plan, final subdivision, or functional equivalent for new residential development may be approved by the County or Cities, unless the residential development is exempt from these requirements as provided in Section 12.1(c) of this Agreement, or until a School Capacity Availability Letter Determination (SCALD) has been issued by the School Board to the local government indicating that adequate school facilities exist. B. A local government may condition the approval of the residential development to ensure that necessary school facilities are in place. This shall not limit the authority of a local government to deny a site plan, final subdivision or its functional equivalent, pursuant to its home rule regulatory powers. C. The following residential uses shall be considered exempt from the requirements of school concurrency: 1. Any amendment to any previously approved residential development, which does not increase the number of dwelling units or change the type of dwelling units (single-family, multi-family, etc.). 2. Any community subject to a restrictive covenant on all residential units that results in no permanent residents under the age of eighteen (18).. 3. De minimus impact residential single-family developments with four (4) or less units, or multi-family developments with eight (8) or less units. Such de minimus impact exempt developments would still be required to go through other approval processes required by the local government(s). D. Any new residential development that received a passing School Capacity Availability Letter of Determination (“SCALD”) prior to the effective date of this Agreement will remain under the terms and conditions established in the Agreement when the SCALD was received and will not be required to apply for a new SCALD under this Agreement or be subject to the time deadlines and forfeiture provisions set forth in Section 12.7 below. E. Upon request by a developer submitting a land development application with a residential component, the School Board shall issue a determination as to whether or not a development, lot or unit is exempt from the requirements of school concurrency and submit a copy of the determination to the local government within 10 days. 147 Page 19 of 37 12.2 School Concurrency Application Review A. A developer may request a preliminary school capacity assessment from the School Board, which will provide the developer with the school capacity available at the time of the preliminary assessment, but will not reserve capacity and will not bind the School Board in subsequent capacity determinations. B. Any developer submitting a development permit application (such as site plan or final subdivision) with a residential component that is not exempt under Section 12.1(C) or 12.1(D) of this Agreement is subject to school concurrency and shall prepare and submit a SCALD Application to the School Board for review. The SCALD Application form shall be obtained from the School Board. C. The SCALD Application shall indicate the location of the development, the number of dwelling units by unit type (single-family detached, single family attached (townhomes/condominiums), multi-family with unit sizes, and mobile homes), a phasing schedule (if applicable), and age restrictions for occupancy (if any). The School Board concurrency test shall follow the following steps: 1. Test Submittal. The developer shall submit a SCALD Application to the School Board with a copy to the local government with jurisdiction over the proposed development. The completed SCALD Application must be submitted a minimum of five days but not more than 30 days prior to Development Application submittal to the local government. The School Board shall perform a sufficiency review on the SCALD Application. An incomplete SCALD Application will be returned to the Owner/Developer without processing. The School Board will have 20 days to determine sufficiency and complete the Test Review. The School Board may charge the applicant a non-refundable application fee payable to the School Board to meet the cost of review in accordance with Florida Statutes. 2. Test Review. Each SCALD Application will be reviewed in the order in which it is received by the School Board. 3. Passing the Test. If the available capacity of public schools for each type within the CSA [or contiguous CSAs as provided for in 12.2(C) below] containing the proposed project is equal to or greater than the proposed project’s needed capacity, the concurrency test is passed. The School Board will issue a SCALD identifying the school capacity available to serve the proposed project, indicating that said capacity has been reserved for the proposed project, and containing a warning that reserved capacity will be forfeited if the developer fails to meet the time deadlines set forth in Section 12.7, below.. 148 Page 20 of 37 4, Forfeiture of reserved capacity. If developer fails to meet the time deadlines set forth in Section 12.7 below, the reserved capacity will be forfeited and the developer must resubmit a new SCALD Application. 5. Failing the Test. If the available capacity of public schools for any type within the CSA (or contiguous CSAs as provided for in Section 12.3(c) below) containing the proposed project is less than the proposed project’s needed capacity, the concurrency test is failed. The School Board will issue a SCALD informing the developer that capacity is not available and advising the developer of the following options: a. Accept a 30 day temporary reservation of available school capacity, and within the same 30-day period, amend the Development Application to balance it with the available capacity. The time deadlines set forth in Section 12.7 will be tolled until the Development Application has been amended or the temporary reservation of capacity has expired, whichever is earlier; or b. Accept a 60 day temporary reservation of available school capacity, and within the same 60 day period, negotiate and agree with the School Board and the local government on a Development Agreement for Mitigation plan as outlined in Section 12.5 below. The time deadlines set forth in Section 12.7 will be tolled until an agreed Development Agreement has been finalized or rejected by the local government board or commission, or the 60 day temporary reservation of capacity has expired without agreement, whichever is earlier; or c. Appeal the results of the failed test pursuant to the provisions in Section 12.8 below; or d. Withdraw the SCALD Application. 6. Test Abandonment. If no option under Section 12.2(B)(5) above is selected by the developer within 15 days following issuance of the SCALD, then the SCALD Application shall be deemed abandoned. 12.3 Methodology. The methodology for performing the concurrency test shall follow the steps outlined below: A. To determine a proposed development’s projected students, the proposed development’s projected number and type of residential units shall be converted into projected students for all schools of each type within the specific CSA using the adopted Student Generation Multiplier, as established in the most current adopted Seminole County Educational System Impact Fee Ordinance and Seminole County Public Schools Impact Fee Study Update. B. New school capacity within a CSA which is in place or planned for construction in the first three years of the School Board’s Capital 149 Page 21 of 37 Improvement Plan will be added to the capacity shown in the CSA, and is counted as available capacity for the residential development under review. C. If the projected student growth from a residential development causes the adopted LOS to be exceeded in the CSA, an adjacent CSA which is contiguous with and touches the boundary of, the concurrency service area within which the proposed development is located shall be evaluated for available capacity. An adjacency evaluation review shall be conducted as follows: 1. In conducting the adjacency review, the School Board shall first use the adjacent CSA with the most available capacity to evaluate projected enrollment impact and, if necessary, shall continue to the next adjacent CSA with the next most available capacity. 2. Consistent with Rule 6A-3.0171 F.A.C., at no time shall the shift of impact to an adjacent CSA result in a total morning or afternoon transportation time of either elementary or secondary students to exceed fifty (50) minutes or one (1) hour, respectively. The transportation time shall be determined by the School Board transportation routing system and measured from the school the impact is to be assigned, to the center of the subject parcel/plat in the amendment application, along the most direct improved pubic roadway free from major hazards. 12.4 Development Review Table. The School Board shall create and maintain a Development Review Table (DRT) for each CSA, and will use the DRT to compare the projected students from proposed residential developments to the CSAs available capacity programmed within the first three years of the current five-year capital planning period. A. Student enrollment projections shall be based on the most recently adopted School Board Capital Facilities Work Program, and the DRT shall be updated to reflect these projections. Available capacity shall be derived using the following formula: Available Capacity = School Capacity¹ – (Enrollment² + Approved³) Where: ¹School Capacity = Program School Capacity as programmed in the first three (3) years of the School Board’s Five-Year CIP ²Enrollment = Student enrollment as counted at the Fall Semester Student Count. ³Approved = Students generated from approved residential developments after the implementation of school concurrency B. Using the Fall Semester Student Count, the vested number of students on the DRT will be reduced by the number of students represented by the residential units that received certificates of occupancy within the previous twelve (12) month period. 12.5 Development Agreement for Mitigation. In the event there is not available school capacity to support a development, the School Board will entertain 150 Page 22 of 37 Development Agreement for Mitigation options consistent with Section 163.3180(6)(h), F.S., and, if accepted, shall enter into an enforceable and binding agreement with the developer to mitigate the impact from the development through the creation of additional school capacity. A. When the anticipated student impacts from a proposed development cause the adopted LOS to be exceeded, the developer’s mitigation agreement will be based on the number of additional student stations necessary to achieve the established LOS. The amount to be paid will be calculated by the cost per student station for elementary, middle and high school as determined and published by the State of Florida. B. The methodology used to calculate a Development Agreement for Mitigation credits shall be as follows: Development Mitigation Share = (¹Development students - Available Capacity) x 2Total Cost per student station Where: ¹Development students = those students from the development that are assigned to a CSA and have triggered a deficiency of the available capacity. 2Total Cost = the cost per student station as determined and published by Seminole County Public Schools School Impact Fee Study Update in effect as of the date of issuance of the SCALD. C. The applicant shall accept a 60 day encumbrance of available school capacity, and within the same 60 day period enter into negotiations with the Local Government(s) with jurisdiction in the effected CSA and the School Board in an effort to mitigate the impact from the development through the creation of additional capacity. Upon identification and acceptance of a mitigation option deemed financially feasible by the Local Government(s) with jurisdiction in the effected CSA and the School Board, the developer shall enter into a binding and enforceable development agreement with the Local Government(s) with jurisdiction in the effected CSA and the School Board. 1. A mitigation contribution provided by a developer to offset the impact of a residential development must be directed by the School Board toward a school capacity project identified in the School Board’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan. 2. If capacity projects are planned in years four (4) or five (5) of the School Board’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan within the same CSA as the proposed residential development, the developer may pay his proportionate share to mitigate the proposed development in accordance with the formula provided in Section 12.5 (B) of this Agreement. 3. If a capacity project does not exist in the Capital Improvement Plan, the School Board will add a capacity project to satisfy the impacts from a proposed residential development, if it is funded through the developer’s proportionate share mitigation contributions. Mitigation options may include, but are not limited to: 151 Page 23 of 37 a. Contribution of land or payment for land acquisition suitable for and in conjunction with, the provision of additional school capacity or through application of County education system impact fee credits pursuant to Seminole County Ordinance 2018‐1, section 105.46; or b. Mitigation banking based on the construction of an educational facility in exchange for the right to receive impact fee credits; or c. Provide modular or permanent student stations acceptable for use as an educational facility; or d. Provide additional student stations through the remodeling of existing buildings acceptable for use as an educational facility; or e. Construction or expansion of permanent student stations at the impacted school within the CSA; or f. Construction of an educational facility in advance of the time set forth in the School Board’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan. D. For mitigation measures (a) thru (f) above, the estimated cost of the mitigating capacity will reflect the estimated future costs at the time of the anticipated construction. Improvements contributed by the developer shall receive school impact fee credit. E. Developer shall receive an impact fee credit for the proportionate share mitigation. Credits will be given for that portion of the impact fees that would have been used to fund the improvements on which the proportionate fair share contribution was calculated. The portion of impact fees available for the credit will be based on the historic Seminole County Impact Fee Ordinance’s distribution of impact fee funds to the school type (elementary, middle, high) in the appropriate CSAs. Impact fee credits shall be calculated at the same time as the applicant’s proportionate share obligation is calculated. Impact fee credits may be transferred pursuant to Section 163.31801, Florida Statutes. F. A proportionate share mitigation contribution shall not be subsequently amended or refunded after final site plan or plat approval to reflect a reduction in planned or constructed residential density. G. Impact fees shall be credited against the proportionate share mitigation total. H. Any proportionate share mitigation must be directed by the School Board toward a school capacity improvement identified in the School Board’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan. I. Upon conclusion of the negotiation period, a second School Capacity Availability Letter of Determination (SCALD) shall be issued. If mitigation is agreed to, the School Board shall issue a new Determination Letter approving the development subject to those mitigation measures agreed to by the local government, developer and the School Board. Prior to, site 152 Page 24 of 37 plan approval, final subdivision approval or the functional equivalent, the mitigation measures shall be memorialized in an enforceable and binding agreement with the local government, the School Board and the Developer that specifically details mitigation provisions to be paid for by the developer and the relevant terms and conditions. If mitigation is not agreed to, the Determination Letter shall detail why any mitigation proposals were rejected and why the development is not in compliance with school concurrency requirements. A SCALD indicating either that adequate capacity is available, or that there is not a negotiated proportionate share mitigation settlement following the sixty (60) day negotiation period as described in Section 12.7(B) of this Agreement, constitutes final agency action by the School Board for purposes of Chapter 120, F.S. 12.6 School Concurrency Approval. Issuance of a SCALD by the School Board identifying that adequate capacity exists indicates only that school facilities are currently available, and capacity for the proposed development has been reserved. A. A local government shall not issue a Development approval for a residential development until receiving confirmation of available school capacity in the form of a SCALD from the School Board. The Development approval shall include a reference to the findings of the SCALD indicating that the project meets school concurrency. B. Local governments shall notify the School Board within fifteen (15) days of any official change in the validity (status) of a Development Approval for a residential development that has received a SCALD. C. The Local Government shall not issue a building permit or its functional equivalent for a non-exempt residential development until receiving confirmation of available school capacity from the School Board in the form of a SCALD. 12.7 Reserved Capacity. School capacity will be reserved when the School District issues the SCALD. If the local government denies the Development Application, then the Development’s reserved school capacity is forfeited. The Development’s reserved school capacity will be forfeited if the development approval or building permit is terminated or expires, or if development fails to meet any of the following time deadlines: A. The development application submittal is not submitted to the local government with jurisdiction within thirty (30) days following the date of issuance of the SCALD. B. Vertical Construction of a portion of the Project associated with residential units has not commenced within two (2) years following issuance of SCALD. This deadline will be extended by School Board for one (1) additional year if the development application is still under review by the local government and upon the recommendation of the local government with jurisdiction; C. Construction of the development identified in the SCALD has not been completed within four (4) years of the commencement of construction. This 153 Page 25 of 37 deadline may be extended by School Board for one (1) additional year upon the recommendation of the local government with jurisdiction. It is the developer’s responsibility to provide written notice to the School Board that each of the above time deadlines has been met. The School Board will provide the developer with thirty (30) days advanced written notice prior to forfeiture of the developer’s reserved capacity in the event the developer does not satisfy 12.7 B. or C. 12.8 Appeal Process. A person substantially affected by a School Board’s adequate capacity determination made as a part of the School Concurrency Process may appeal such determination through the process provided in Chapter 120, F.S., Administrative Procedure Act. SECTION 13 OVERSIGHT 13.1 Oversight. The PSFPC will serve as the required oversight committee for school concurrency to monitor and evaluate the school concurrency program. The committee shall meet at a minimum once annually in accordance with the laws of Florida governing public meetings, and report to participating local governments, the School Board and the general public on the effectiveness with which this Agreement is being implemented. The PSFPC representative from the Seminole County School Board shall act as the chairperson. A designee of the School Board shall be responsible for coordinating the PSFPC meetings. A. The monitoring and evaluation of the school concurrency process is required pursuant to Section 163.3180(6)(i)4c, F.S., and Section 2 of this Agreement. The PSFPC shall be responsible for evaluating this Agreement and the effectiveness of the School Concurrency System. Commencing in 2025, upon completion of each periodic Seminole County Impact Fee Study Update pursuant to the Land Development Code of Seminole County, Chapter 105, “Education System Impact Fees”, the PSFPC shall evaluate the effectiveness of the CSAs for measuring LOS and consider making recommendations to amend this Agreement. The failure of the PSFPC to initiate this review in a timely manner shall not affect the validity of this Agreement. B. The PSFPC members shall receive copies of all reports and documents produced pursuant to this Agreement. C. During the first quarter of each school year, the PSFPC shall receive the proposed School Board’s District Educational Facilities Work Plan and the Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan. The PSFPC will report to the School Board, the County, and the Cities on whether or not the proposed Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan maintains the adopted Level of Service in each CSA. SECTION 14 SPECIAL PROVISIONS 14.1 School Board Requirements. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the School Board is or may be subject to the requirements of the Florida and United States Constitutions and other state or federal statutes regarding the operation of the public school system and the rules by the State Board of Education or Commissioner of Education. 154 Page 26 of 37 Accordingly, the County, the Cities and the School Board agree that this Agreement is not intended, and will not be construed, to interfere with, hinder, or obstruct in any manner, the School Board’s constitutional and statutory obligation and sovereignty to provide a uniform system of free public schools on a Countywide basis or to require the School Board to confer with, or obtain the consent of, the County or the Cities, as to whether that obligation has been satisfied. Further, the County, the Cities and the School Board agree that this Agreement is not intended and will not be construed to impose any duty or obligation on the County or City for the School Board’s constitutional or statutory obligation. The County and the Cities also acknowledge that the School Board’s obligations under this Agreement may be superseded by state or federal court orders or other state or federal legal mandates. 14.2 Land Use Authority. The Parties specifically acknowledge that each Local Government is responsible for approving or denying comprehensive plan amendments and development approvals within its own jurisdiction. Nothing herein represents or authorizes a transfer of any of this authority to the School Board. SECTION 15 AMENDMENT PROCESS, NOTICE, AND TERM OF AGREEMENT 15.1 Amendment of the Agreement. This Agreement may be amended by written consent of no less than eighty-eight percent (88%) of all Parties to this Agreement with the exception of the provisions noted below. The Agreement will remain in effect until amended in accordance with Florida Statutes. A. Amendment of Section 11.2.B shall require the written consent of all parties. B. The repeal of School Concurrency shall require the written consent of all Parties. C. Amendment of any part of the Agreement that, upon the School Board’s reasonable determination, would necessitate a revision of school attendance zones requires the consent of the School Board. The School Board must consider alternatives to revision of attendance zones that would create voluntary student transfers before determining whether the proposed amendment would necessitate a revision of school attendance zones. Nothing in this section shall be interpreted as infringing on the School board’s absolute right to determine school attendance zones in accordance with Florida law and School Board policy. D. Amendment of this Section 15.1 shall require the written consent of all Parties. 15.2 Notice Requirements. Any notices provided pursuant to this Agreement shall be sent to the following addresses: City Manager City of Altamonte Springs 225 Newburyport Avenue Altamonte Springs, Florida 32701 City Manager City of Casselberry 95 Triplet Lake Drive Casselberry, Florida 32707 City Manager City of Sanford 300 North Park Avenue Sanford, Florida 32771 City Manager City of Winter Springs 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 155 Page 27 of 37 City Manager City of Lake Mary 100 North Country Club Road Lake Mary, Florida 32746 City Manager City of Longwood 175 West Warren Avenue Longwood, Florida 32750 City Manager City of Oviedo 400 Alexandria Boulevard Oviedo, Florida 32765 County Manager Seminole County Government 1101 East First Street Sanford, Florida 32771 School Board Superintendent Seminole County School Board 400 East Lake Mary Boulevard Sanford, Florida 32773 15.3 Repeal of the Agreement. If the Florida Statute as it pertains to school planning coordination and school concurrency is repealed, the Agreement may be terminated by written consent of all parties of this Agreement. 15.4 Termination of the Agreement. No party to this Agreement may terminate its participation in the agreement except through the exemption process in which a municipality may not be required to participate in school concurrency when demonstrating that all the requirements are no longer having a significant impact on school attendance at the time of a local government Evaluation and Appraisal Report, by providing a sixty (60) day written notice to other parties and to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. 15.5 Withdrawal. Withdrawal from the Agreement by any party shall not alter the terms of the Agreement with respect to the remaining signatories. SECTION 16 RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES 16.1 Dispute Resolution. If the parties to this Agreement are unable to resolve any issue in which they may be in disagreement covered in this Agreement, such dispute will be resolved in accordance with governmental conflict resolution procedures specified in Chapter 164, F.S. SECTION 17 EXECUTION IN COUNTERPARTS 17.1 Agreement Execution. This Agreement shall be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which so executed shall be deemed to be original, but all such counterparts shall, together, constitute but one in the same instrument. SECTION 18 SUCCESSION OF AGREEMENT 18.1 Succession of Agreement. This Agreement supersedes any previous agreement regarding public school facilities planning upon the effective date of this Agreement. SECTION 19 EFFECTIVE DATE 19.1 Effective Date. This Agreement becomes effective upon full execution of the last party. 156 Page 28 of 37 ATTEST: CITY OF ALTAMONTE SPRINGS ____________________________ By:_________________________ , City Clerk , Mayor Date: _______________________ 2021 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND SCHOOL CONCURRENCY Seminole County, Florida 157 Page 29 of 37 ATTEST: CITY OF CASSELBERRY ____________________________ By:_________________________ ,City Clerk , Mayor Date: _______________________ 2021 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND SCHOOL CONCURRENCY Seminole County, Florida 158 Page 30 of 37 ATTEST: CITY OF LAKE MARY ____________________________ By:_________________________ , City Clerk , Mayor Date: _______________________ 2021 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND SCHOOL CONCURRENCY Seminole County, Florida 159 Page 31 of 37 ATTEST: CITY OF LONGWOOD ____________________________ By:_________________________ , City Clerk , Mayor Date: _______________________ 2021 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND SCHOOL CONCURRENCY Seminole County, Florida 160 Page 32 of 37 ATTEST: CITY OF OVIEDO ____________________________ By:_________________________ , City Clerk , Mayor Date: _______________________ 2021 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND SCHOOL CONCURRENCY Seminole County, Florida 161 Page 33 of 37 ATTEST: CITY OF SANFORD ____________________________ By:_________________________ , City Clerk , Mayor Date: _______________________ 2021 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND SCHOOL CONCURRENCY Seminole County, Florida 162 Page 34 of 37 ATTEST: CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS ____________________________ By:_________________________ , City Clerk , Mayor Date: _______________________ 2021 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND SCHOOL CONCURRENCY Seminole County, Florida 163 Page 35 of 37 ATTEST: SCHOOL BOARD OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA ____________________________ By:_________________________ Serita Beamon, Superintendent , Chairman Date: _______________________ 2021 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND SCHOOL CONCURRENCY Seminole County, Florida 164 Page 36 of 37 ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA ____________________________ By:_________________________ , Chairman Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners of Seminole Date: _______________________ County, Florida 2021 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND SCHOOL CONCURRENCY Seminole County, Florida 165 Page 37 of 37 APPENDIX A CONCURRENCY SERVICE AREAS (CSAs) CSA - ELEMENTARY SCHOOL E-0 Goldsboro Elementary (Districtwide Magnet) E-1 Geneva & Walker Elementary E-2 Lawton & Stenstrom Elementary E-3 Carillon & Partin Elementary E-4 Evans & Rainbow Elementary E-5 East Brook & Red Bug Elementary E-6 Casselberry & Sterling Park Elementary E-7 Keeth & Layer Elementary E-8 English Estates & Lake Orienta Elementary E-9 Highlands & Winter Springs Elementary E-10 Longwood & Woodlands Elementary E-11 Altamonte & Spring Lake Elementary E-12 Bear Lake & Forest City Elementary E-13 Sabal Point & Wekiva Elementary E-14 Heathrow & Lake Mary Elementary E-15 Crystal Lake & Wicklow Elementary (Region 2) E-16 Bentley, Idyllwilde, & Wilson Elementary (Region 1) E-17 Hamilton, Midway, & Pine Crest Elementary (Region 3) CSA-MIDDLE SCHOOL M-1 Chiles Middle School M-2 Jackson Heights Middle School M-3 Tuskawilla Middle School M-4 Indian Trails Middle School M-5 South Seminole Middle School M-6 Milwee Middle School M-7 Teague Middle School M-8 Rock Lake Middle School M-9 Greenwood Lakes Middle School M-10 Millennium Middle School M-11 Sanford Middle School M-12 Markham Woods Middle School CSA - HIGH SCHOOL H-0 Crooms Academy (Districtwide Magnet) H-1 Hagerty High School H-2 Oviedo High School H-3 Winter Springs High School H-4 Lake Howell High School H-5 Lyman High School H-6 Lake Brantley High School H-7 Lake Mary High School H-8 Seminole High School 166 n n n n n n n n n n nn n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n Lake Jesup Lake Monroe Lake Harney £¤17 £¤92 £¤441 £¤92 £¤17 £¤92£¤17 £¤17 £¤17 §¨¦4 §¨¦4 LAYER EVANS KEETH MIDWAY GENEVA WALKER WEKIVA LAWTON PARTIN WILSON BENTLEY WICKLOW RED BUG RAINBOW LONGWOOD HAMILTON CARILLON HEATHROW HIGHLANDS GOLDSBORO STENSTROM LAKE MARY EASTBROOK BEAR LAKE ALTAMONTE WOODLANDS PINE CREST IDYLLWILDE CASSELBERRYSPRING LAKE FOREST CITY SABAL POINT CRYSTAL LAKE LAKE ORIENTA STERLING PARK WINTER SPRINGS ENGLISH ESTATES Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c)OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Seminole County Public Schools Elementary School Attendance Zones ± 0 4 82Miles Data presented is provided “as is” at the time the map wasprepared. The viewer acknowledges andaccepts the limitations of the data, including thefact that the data is dynamic and in a constantstate of maintenance, correction and update. PREPARED BY: Seminole County Public Schools July 2021 Legend n Elementary School Locations 167 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 CHILES MILWEE TEAGUE SANFORD ROCK LAKE MILLENNIUM TUSKAWILLA MARKHAM WOODS INDIAN TRAILS SOUTH SEMINOLE JACKSON HEIGHTS GREENWOOD LAKES Lake Jesup Lake Monroe Lake Harney £¤17 £¤92 £¤441 £¤92 £¤17 £¤92 £¤92£¤17 £¤17 £¤17 §¨¦4 §¨¦4 Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c)OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Seminole County Public Schools Middle School Attendance Zones ± 0 4 82Miles Data presented is provided “as is” at the time the map wasprepared. The viewer acknowledges andaccepts the limitations of the data, including thefact that the data is dynamic and in a constantstate of maintenance, correction and update. PREPARED BY: Seminole County Public Schools July 2021 Legend 5 Middle School Locations 168 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 LYMAN OVIEDO HAGERTY SEMINOLE LAKE MARY LAKE HOWELL LAKE BRANTLEY WINTER SPRINGS Lake Jesup Lake Monroe Lake Harney £¤17 £¤92 £¤441 £¤92 £¤17 £¤92 £¤92£¤17 £¤17 £¤17 §¨¦4 §¨¦4 Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c)OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Seminole County Public Schools High School Attendance Zones ± 0 4 82Miles Data presented is provided “as is” at the time the map wasprepared. The viewer acknowledges andaccepts the limitations of the data, including thefact that the data is dynamic and in a constantstate of maintenance, correction and update. PREPARED BY: Seminole County Public Schools July 2021 Legend 5 High School Locations 169 SCHOOL CAPACITY ANALYSISSeminole County Public SchoolsAlphabetical ORDEREnrollment 10-15-2021 SURVEY 2 ENROLLMENT STATUS ELEMENTARYEnrollment 10-9-2020Enrollment 10-15-2021Growth PERM STUDENT STATIONS SCHOOL PROGRAM CAPACITY (100%) OVER(-) BELOW(+) CAPACITY % OF PERM PROGRAM CAPACITY ENROLLMENT-v-PERM CAPACITY STATUS TEMPORARY STUDENT STATIONS SCHOOL PROGRAM CAPACITY INCL PORTABLES OVER(-) BELOW(+) CAPACITY % OF PROGRAM CAPACITY INCLUDING PORTABLES ENROLLMENT-v-PROGRAM CAPACITY INCL PORTABLES STATUS Altamonte ElementaryE-7 606 614 8 941 941 327 65.2%Below Capacity0 941 327 65.2%Below CapacityBear Lake ElementaryE-8 947 904 -43 1,147 1,147 243 78.8%Below Capacity0 1,147 243 78.8%Below CapacityBentley ElementaryR-1 & 2E-9 957 961 4 999 999 38 96.2%Near Capacity0 999 38 96.2%Near CapacityCarillon ElementaryE-2 984 949 -35 1,044 1,044 95 90.9%Approaching Capacity0 1,044 95 90.9%Approaching CapacityCasselberry ElementaryE-5 699 711 12 788 788 77 90.2%Approaching Capacity22 810 99 87.8%Below CapacityCrystal LakeR-2E-9 704 677 -27 879 879 202 77.0%Below Capacity0 879 202 77.0%Below CapacityEastbrook ElementaryE-4 748 691 -57 848 848 157 81.5%Below Capacity0 848 157 81.5%Below CapacityEnglish Estates ElementaryE-4 719 680 1 839 839 159 81.0%Below Capacity0 839 159 81.0%Below CapacityEvans ElementaryE-2 852 882 30 958 958 76 92.1%Approaching Capacity22 980 98 90.0%Approaching CapacityForest City ElementaryE-8 796 802 6 963 963 161 83.3%Below Capacity0 963 161 83.3%Below CapacityGeneva ElementaryE-1538514 -24 590 590 76 87.1%Below Capacity66 656 142 78.4%Below CapacityGoldsboro ElementaryE-9 842 820 -22 1,102 1,102 282 74.4%Below Capacity0 1,102 282 74.4%Below CapacityHamilton ElementaryR-3E-10 623 660 37 794 794 134 83.1%Below Capacity0 794 134 83.1%Below CapacityHeathrow ElementaryE-6 759 777 18 813 813 36 95.6%Near Capacity110 923 146 84.2%Below CapacityHighlands Elementary E-6 554 533 -21 632 632 99 84.3%Below Capacity36 668 135 79.8%Below CapacityIdyllwilde ElementaryR-1E-9 777 782 5 846 846 64 92.4%Approaching Capacity72 918 136 85.2%Below CapacityKeeth Elementary E-3600599 -1 633 633 34 94.6%Approaching Capacity88 721 122 83.1%Below CapacityLake Mary ElementaryE-6 850 871 21 976 976 105 89.2%Below Capacity88 1,064 193 81.9%Below CapacityLake Orienta ElementaryE-7 652 629 -23 798 798 169 78.8%Below Capacity0 798 169 78.8%Below CapacityLawton ElementaryE-1764786 22 811 811 25 96.9%Near Capacity0 811 25 96.9%Near CapacityLayer Elementary E-3 542 571 29 692 692 121 82.5%Below Capacity22 714 143 80.0%Below CapacityLongwood Elementary E-6 570 619 49 617 617 -2 100.3%Over Capacity0 617 -2 100.3%Over CapacityMidway ElementaryR-3E-10 798 772 -26 1,106 1,106 334 69.8%Below Capacity0 1,106 334 69.8%Below CapacityPartin ElementaryE-2 664 640 -24 717 717 77 89.3%Below Capacity44 761 121 84.1%Below CapacityPine Crest ElementaryR-3E-10 636 638 2 1,082 1,082 444 59.0%Below Capacity0 1,082 444 59.0%Below CapacityRainbow ElementaryE-3754792 38 726 726 -66 109.1%Over Capacity0 726 -66 109.1%Over CapacityRed Bug ElementaryE-4 774 773 -1 908 908 135 85.1%Below Capacity0 908 135 85.1%Below CapacitySabal Point ElementaryE-8 888 888 0 974 974 86 91.2%Approaching Capacity0 974 86 91.2%Approaching CapacitySpring Lake ElementaryE-8 551 575 24 793 793 218 72.5%Below Capacity22 815 240 70.6%Below CapacityStenstrom ElementaryE-2 641 627 -14 1,005 1,005 378 62.4%Below Capacity0 1,005 378 62.4%Below CapacitySterling Park ElementaryE-3 787 751 -36 962 962 211 78.1%Below Capacity0 962 211 78.1%Below CapacityWalker ElementaryE-1 742 734 -8 925 925 191 79.4%Below Capacity0 925 191 79.4%Below CapacityWekiva ElementaryE-8 798 858 60 864 864 6 99.3%Near Capacity0 864 6 99.3%Near CapacityWicklow ElementaryR-2E-9 682 679 -3 820 820 141 82.8%Below Capacity44 864 185 78.6%Below CapacityWilson ElementaryR-1E-9 909 897 -12 1,029 1,029 132 87.2%Below Capacity18 1,047 150 85.7%Below CapacityWinter Springs Elementary E-5 605 583 -22 721 721 138 80.9%Below Capacity0 721 138 80.9%Below CapacityWoodlands Elementary E-7 780 787 7 864 864 77 91.1%Approaching Capacity66 930 143 84.6%Below CapacityTOTAL27,092 27,026 -2632,206 32,2065,11484.1% 720 32,9265,83482.3% SCHOOL CAPACITY INCLUDING PORTABLES PERMANENT BUILDING SCHOOL CAPACITY REGION DOE ASSIGNED STUDENT STATIONS & CAPACITY (FISH) 2018 CSA ENROLLMENT COMPARISON 2020-21 VS 2021-22 (PK-12) "BELOW CAPACITY" Available Capacity >10% of school capacity. "APROACHING CAPACITY" Available Capacity <10%, > 5% of school capacity. "NEAR CAPACITY" Available Capacity < 5% of school capacity.Page 1 of 2Facilities Planning Department170 SCHOOL CAPACITY ANALYSISSeminole County Public SchoolsAlphabetical ORDEREnrollment 10-15-2021CENTERSEnrollment 10-9-2020Enrollment 10-15-2021GrowthPERM STUDENT STATIONSSCHOOL (FISH) CAPACITY (100%) OVER(-) BELOW(+) CAPACITY % OF PERM PROGRAM CAPACITY ENROLLMENT-v-PERM CAPACITY STATUS TEMPORARY STUDENT STATIONS SCHOOL PROGRAM CAPACITY INCL PORTABLES OVER(-) BELOW(+) CAPACITY % OF PROGRAM CAPACITY INCLUDING PORTABLES ENROLLMENT-v-PROGRAM CAPACITY INCL PORTABLES STATUS Endeavor* 42 39 -3 2609 2609 2,570 1.5%Below Capacity0 2,609 2,570 1.5%Below CapacityHopper Center* 16 11 -5 908 908 897 1.2%Below Capacity18 926 915 1.2%Below CapacityJourneys Academy27 57 30 440 396 339 14.4%Below Capacity0 440 383 13.0%Below Capacity*Utilization Factor 100 % SREF Section 6.1TOTAL85 107 223957 39133,8282.2% 18 3,9753,8902.1%MIDDLEEnrollment 10-9-2020Enrollment 10-15-2021GrowthPERM STUDENT STATIONSSCHOOL (FISH) CAPACITY (100%) OVER(-) BELOW(+) CAPACITY % OF PERM PROGRAM CAPACITY ENROLLMENT-v-PERM CAPACITY STATUS TEMPORARY STUDENT STATIONS SCHOOL PROGRAM CAPACITY INCL PORTABLES OVER(-) BELOW(+) CAPACITY % OF PROGRAM CAPACITY INCLUDING PORTABLES ENROLLMENT-v-PROGRAM CAPACITY INCL PORTABLES STATUS Chiles (New) Middle M-41,3121,278 -34 1,481 1,481 203 86.3%Below Capacity0 1,481 203 86.3%Below CapacityGreenwood Lakes Middle M-1 998 1,003 5 1,407 1,407 404 71.3%Below Capacity0 1,407 404 71.3%Below CapacityIndian Trails Middle M-3 1,208 1,215 1,400 1,560 1,560 345 77.9%Below Capacity0 1,560 345 77.9%Below CapacityJackson Heights Middle M-41,4041,431 27 1,544 1,544 113 92.7%Approaching Capacity88 1,632 201 87.7%Below CapacityMarkham Woods Middle M-1 1,051 1,041 -10 1,400 1,400 359 74.4%Below Capacity0 1,400 359 74.4%Below CapacityMillennium Middle (New) M-1 1,403 1,370 -33 1,937 1,937 567 70.7%Below Capacity0 1,937 567 70.7%Below CapacityMilwee Middle M-21,4321,414 -18 1,387 1,387 -27 101.9%Over Capacity110 1,497 83 94.5%Approaching CapacityRock Lake Middle M-2 1,062 987 -75 1,260 1,260 273 78.3%Below Capacity0 1,260 273 78.3%Below CapacitySanford Middle M-11,4231,321 -102 1,608 1,608 287 82.2%Below Capacity198 1,806 485 73.1%Below CapacitySouth Seminole Middle M-3 1,092 985 -107 1,349 1,349 364 73.0%Below Capacity44 1,393 408 70.7%Below CapacityTeague Middle M-2 1,265 1,181 -84 1,788 1,788 607 66.1%Below Capacity0 1,788 607 66.1%Below CapacityTuskawilla Middle M-3 1,171 1,100-71 1,389 1,389 289 79.2%Below Capacity0 1,389 289 79.2%Below CapacityTOTAL14,821 14,326 89818,110 18,1103,28981.8% 440 18,5503,72979.9%HIGHEnrollment 10-9-2020Enrollment 10-15-2021GrowthPERM STUDENT STATIONSSCHOOL (FISH) CAPACITY (100%) OVER(-) BELOW(+) CAPACITY % OF PERM PROGRAM CAPACITY ENROLLMENT-v-PERM CAPACITY STATUS TEMPORARY STUDENT STATIONS SCHOOL PROGRAM CAPACITY INCL PORTABLES OVER(-) BELOW(+) CAPACITY % OF PROGRAM CAPACITY INCLUDING PORTABLES ENROLLMENT-v-PROGRAM CAPACITY INCL PORTABLES STATUS Crooms* H-1 740 693 -47 954 811 118 85.5%Below Capacity0 811 118 85.5%Below CapacityHagerty High H-4 2,419 2,359 -60 2,799 2,799 440 84.3%Below Capacity0 2,799 440 84.3%Below CapacityLake Brantley High H-2 2,641 2,598 -43 3,136 3,136 538 82.8%Below Capacity0 3,136 538 82.8%Below CapacityLake Howell High H-3 2,223 2,239 16 2,472 2,472 233 90.6%Approaching Capacity0 2,472 233 90.6%Approaching CapacityLake Mary High H-1 2,681 2,631 -50 2,953 2,953 322 89.1%Below Capacity150 3,103 472 84.8%Below CapacityLyman High H-2 2,135 2,009 -126 2,681 2,681 672 74.9%Below Capacity172 2,853 844 70.4%Below CapacityOviedo High H-4 2,397 2,316 -81 2,978 2,978 662 77.8%Below Capacity0 2,978 662 77.8%Below CapacitySeminole High H-1 4,303 4,114 -189 5,124 5,124 1,010 80.3%Below Capacity0 5,124 1,010 80.3%Below CapacityWinter Springs High H-3 1,973 1,989 16 2,609 2,609 620 76.2%Below Capacity0 2,609 620 76.2%Below Capacity*Utilization Factor 85 % SREF Section 6.1TOTAL21,512 20,948 -56425,706 25,5634,05184.2% 322 25,8854,37383.1%DISTRICT TOTAL63,510 62,407 33079,979 79,792 16,282 79.6%Below Capacity1,500 81,336 17,826 78.1%Below CapacityPERMANENT BUILDING SCHOOL CAPACITYSCHOOL CAPACITY INCLUDING PORTABLESDOE ASSIGNED STUDENT CSA CSA PERMANENT BUILDING SCHOOL CAPACITY SCHOOL CAPACITY INCLUDING PORTABLES DOE ASSIGNED STUDENT STATIONS & CAPACITY (FISH) 2018 CSA ENROLLMENT COMPARISON 2020-21 VS 2021-22 (PK-12) "BELOW CAPACITY" Available Capacity >10% of school capacity. "APROACHING CAPACITY" Available Capacity <10%, > 5% of school capacity. "NEAR CAPACITY" Available Capacity < 5% of school capacity.Page 2 of 2Facilities Planning Department171 NENW 2,432 Units 18% 1,985 Units 15%SESW 3,104 Units 23% 6,030 Units 44% Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c)OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community SCALDS as of Oc tober 2021Prop os ed Units ± 0 3.5 71.75 Miles Data p res ented is p rovided “as is ” at the time the map w asp rep ared. The view er ac know ledges andac c ep ts the limitations of the data, inc luding thefac t that the data is dynamic and in a c ons tants tate of maintenanc e, c orrec tion and up date. PREPARED BY: Seminole County Public Sc hools October 2021 Legend Units 1 - 30 31 - 75 76 - 150 151 - 300 301 - 1,310 Quardants Seminole County BoundaryCityName ALTAMONTE SPRINGS CASSELBERRY LAKE MARY LONGWOOD OVIEDO SANFORD WINTER SPRINGS 172 541999792908475746260567948423331302010110318%Lake MonroeLake JesupSources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c)OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User CommunitySCALDS as of October 2021 (Northeast Quadrant)Proposed Units±0120.5MilesData presented is provided “as is” at the time the map wasprepared. The viewer acknowledges andaccepts the limitations of the data, including thefact that the data is dynamic and in a constantstate of maintenance, correction and update.PREPARED BY: Seminole County Public SchoolsOctober 2021LegendUnits1 - 3031 - 7576 - 150151 - 300301 - 1,310Quardants§¨¦4£¤17£¤441£¤17£¤17£¤92Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c)OpenStreetMap contributors,and the GIS user community12012‐19Kensington Reserve (Brisson West)375 328 4742015‐02Cameron Heights (Village A, D ‐ H and J)208 460 46552017‐20Cameron Heights Village B (EastGrove)17 0 1720 2018‐18 Riverside Oaks 130 24 10630 2018‐19 Cameron Heights Village "C" 76 0 76332018‐26 Florida Extruders Property 176 59 11742 2019‐08 Celery Oaks 112 0 11248 2019‐22 Celery Pointe 100 0 10056 2019‐31 Sylvestri Estates 430 0 43060 2020‐05 Celery Cove 37 34 362 2020‐08 River Run Preserve 94 0 94742021‐01Lake Monroe Shores Townhomes150 0 15075 2021‐02 First Street Station 32 0 3279 2021‐06 Skyway Townhomes 85 0 8584 2021‐11 Myrtle Estates Homes 36 0 3690 2021‐17 Ryder Reserve 5 0 5922021‐19(2019‐30)Cameron Heights Village C‐1 (SCALD RENEWED 4/22/2021 ‐ rlb)109 0 10997 2021‐24 Sanford Courtyard 10 0 1099 2021‐26 Stella Cove 8 0 8101 2021‐28 Celery Avenue Subdivision 93 0 93103 2021‐30 Kentucky Square 149 0 1492,432 905 2,244Number SCALD #Development Name UnitsCOs as of 10/15/2021Remaining Units173 299989695918584837775745854504746459440373635322823131123%Lake MonroeSources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c)OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User CommunitySCALDS as of October 2021 (Northwest Quadrant)Proposed Units±01.530.75MilesData presented is provided “as is” at the time the map wasprepared. The viewer acknowledges andaccepts the limitations of the data, including thefact that the data is dynamic and in a constantstate of maintenance, correction and update.PREPARED BY: Seminole County Public SchoolsOctober 2021LegendUnits1 - 3031 - 7576 - 150151 - 300301 - 1,310QuardantsSeminole County BoundaryCityNameALTAMONTE SPRINGSCASSELBERRYLAKE MARYLONGWOODOVIEDOSANFORDWINTER SPRINGS§¨¦4£¤17£¤441£¤17£¤17£¤92Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c)OpenStreetMap contributors,and the GIS user community22013‐10 Lake Markham Landings 46 15 3111 2016‐19 Griffin Farm at Midtown 138 104 3413 2016‐29 Waterside II 9 2 718 2017‐13 Evergreen 95 30 6523 2017‐26 Terra Bona Estates 5 0 528 2018‐16Chateaux at Markham (no activity)10 0 1032 2018‐22 Broadstone Forest 260 120 14035 2018‐29 The Dwell at Lake Mary 272 0 27236 2018‐30 Estuary at St Johns (Gateway) 65 52 1337 2018‐31 Tesoro Townhomes 53 0 5340 2019‐03Allure on the Parkway/Encore Place290 3 28745 2019‐14Parkview at Lake Mary (FKA New Century)300 50 25046 2019‐20 Traditions at White Cedar 48 34 1447 2019‐21Via Foresta8 0 850 2019‐24 Crestwood Estates 20 10 1054 2019‐28 Vintage North Apts 310 0 31058 2020‐02Savta Reserve 14 0 1477 2021‐04 Sanford Station Apartments 294 0 29483 2021‐10 Novel Parkway Apartments 325 0 32585 2021‐12Bartam's Landing at St Johns (fka Gateway)31 0 3191 2021‐18 Seminole St Johns 352 0 35294 021‐21(2019‐12)Fountain Park PD 106 0 10695 2021‐22Sylvan Estates (fka Lake Sylvan Oaks, Phase 3)12 0 1296 2021‐23 The Cove at Sanford Farms 30 0 3098 2021‐25 Mayfair Cove 11 0 113,104 420 2,684COs as of 10/15/2021Remaining UnitsNumber SCALD # Development Name Units 174 8763692289888617876726661575553525143382925151010215%Lake JesupLake HarneySources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c)OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User CommunitySCALDS as of October 2021 (Southeast Quadrant)Proposed Units±01.530.75MilesData presented is provided “as is” at the time the map wasprepared. The viewer acknowledges andaccepts the limitations of the data, including thefact that the data is dynamic and in a constantstate of maintenance, correction and update.PREPARED BY: Seminole County Public SchoolsOctober 2021LegendUnits1 - 3031 - 7576 - 150151 - 300301 - 1,310QuardantsSeminole County BoundaryCityNameALTAMONTE SPRINGSCASSELBERRYLAKE MARYLONGWOODOVIEDOSANFORDWINTER SPRINGS§¨¦4£¤17£¤17£¤17£¤92Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c)OpenStreetMap contributors,and the GIS user community3 2014‐21 Parkdale Place 96 81 156 2015‐29 Brighton Estates 12 0 127 2015‐31 Pinewood Estates 10 0 108 2016‐02Tuskawilla Crossing Re‐evaluation (2015‐25)379 371 810 2016‐17 Enclave at Dunmar 8 2 615 2016‐33 Northern Oaks resubmittal 35 13 2222 2017‐25 Estates at Wellington 24 1 2325 2018‐03 Hideaway Cove 92 39 5329 2018‐17 Winter Springs Townhomes 114 43 7138 2018‐32 Dwell at Oviedo reeval 2 300 0 30043 2019‐10 Modern Jamestown Reserve 10 0 1051 2019‐25 Chapman Pines 37 0 3752 2019‐26 Hideaway Cove Phs 33926 1353 2019‐27 Grove Ave Estates 9 1 855 2019‐29 Red Ember Estates 76 0 7657 2019‐32 Geneva Ski Lake 12 0 1261 2020‐06 NOMA PD 269 0 26966 2020‐16 Pine Aveneue Property 23 0 2369 2020‐26 RED EMBER ESTATES 19 0 1972 2020‐29 Park Square Homes 63 0 6376 2021‐03 Hickory Grove (The Gathering) 133 0 13378 2021‐05 Broadway Townhomes 20 0 2086 2021‐13 City Place (Oviedo) 50 0 5088 2021‐15 Towns at Tuskaloma Commons 111 0 11189 2021‐16 The Adel at Lake Jesup 14 0 14102 2021‐29 Loma Vista PUD 30 0 301,985 577 1,408Number SCALD # Development Name UnitsCOs as of 10/15/2021Remaining Units175 91912938782818073717068676564635949444139342726242117161410044%Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c)OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User CommunitySCALDS as of October 2021 (Southwest Quadrant)Proposed Units±01.530.75MilesData presented is provided “as is” at the time the map wasprepared. The viewer acknowledges andaccepts the limitations of the data, including thefact that the data is dynamic and in a constantstate of maintenance, correction and update.PREPARED BY: Seminole County Public SchoolsOctober 2021LegendUnits1 - 3031 - 7576 - 150151 - 300301 - 1,310QuardantsSeminole County BoundaryCityNameALTAMONTE SPRINGSCASSELBERRYLAKE MARYLONGWOODOVIEDOSANFORDWINTER SPRINGS§¨¦4£¤17£¤441£¤17£¤17£¤92Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c)OpenStreetMap contributors, and theGIS user community8 2016‐05 Greenville at Casselberry 41 33 811 2016‐27 Village Green (Longwood) 12 0 1213 2016‐31Reserve at Lake Wildmere Phase 238 29 915 2016‐34 Klinger Property 94 63 3116 2017‐11 Legacy Place Townhomes 64 4 6018 2017‐17 Legacy at Sunbranch 17 14 320 2017‐23 Hawk's Crest (re eval 2017‐08) 707 566 14123 2017‐28 Spring Tree Village Phase 441 20 2125 2018‐08 Sand Lake Rd residential 13 0 1326 2018‐11 Myrtle Townhomes 10 0 10332018‐28Preserve at Maitland Townhomes10 8 238 2019‐02 Kiwi at Fern Lake 75 0 7540 2019‐06 Jefferson at Lake Howell 384 378 643 2019‐13 Longwood TOD Townhomes 52 0 5248 2019‐23 Oxford Place Phase 12450 24558 2020‐04 Reserve at Hillview 41 0 4162 2020‐09 Oxford Place Phase 23300 33063 2020‐10 Oxford Place Phase 32000 20064 2020‐14 Alta Cypress 342 0 34266 2020‐20 West Town Parkway (Amended)539 0 539672020‐23ADDISON LONGWOOD APARTMENTS277 0 27769 2020‐27 Iconn Commons 26 0 2670 2020‐28 Northridge Reserve 6 0 672 2020‐30 Lake Shore at Center Pointe 1319 0 131979 2021‐07 Slovak Garden Townhomes 138 0 13880 2021‐08 Hidden Oaks 105 0 10581 2021‐09 Marquis Townhomes 26 0 2686 2021‐14 Altamonte Springs Apartment 346 0 34692 2021‐20 The Hartley 264 0 26499 2021‐27 Solera Altamonte 268 0 2686,030 1,115 4,915Remaining UnitsNumber SCALD #Development Name UnitsCOs as of 10/15/2021176 2007 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND SCHOOL CONCURRENCY AS AMENDED JANUARY 2008 Seminole County, Florida THIS AGREEMENT is entered into with the Seminole County Board of County Commissioners (hereinafter referred to as the "County".), the Commission or Council of the Cities of Longwood, Altamonte Springs, Oviedo, Winter Springs, Lake Mary, Sanford, Casselberry (hereinafter referred to as the "Cities"), and the School Board of Seminole County (hereinafter referred to as the "School Board"), collectively referred to as the "Parties". WHEREAS, the County, Cities and the School Board recognize their mutual obligation and responsibility for the education, nurturing and general well-being of the children within their community; and WHEREAS, the County, Cities and the School Board are authorized to enter into this Agreement pursuant to Section 163.01, Section 163.3177(6)(h)2 and Section 1013.33, Florida Statutes (F.S.); and WHEREAS, the County, Cities, and School Board recognize the following benefits to the citizens and students of their communities by more closely coordinating their comprehensive land use and school facilities planning programs: (1) better coordination of the timing and location of new schools with land development, (2) greater efficiency for the school board and local governments by siting schools to take advantage of existing and planned roads, water, sewer, and parks, (3) improved student access and safety by coordinating the construction of new and expanded schools with the road and sidewalk construction programs of the local governments, (4) better designed urban form by locating and designing schools to serve as community focal points, (5) greater efficiency and convenience by co-locating schools with parks, ball fields, libraries, and other community facilities to take advantage of joint use opportunities, and (6) reduction of the factors that contribute to urban sprawl and support of existing neighborhoods by appropriately locating new schools and expanding and renovating existing schools; and WHEREAS, the County, Cities and School Board have determined that it is necessary and appropriate for the entities to cooperate with each other to provide adequate public school facilities in a timely manner and at appropriate locations, to eliminate any deficit of per-manent student stations, and to provide capacity for projected new growth; and WHEREAS, Section 1013.33, F.S., requires that the location of public educational facilities must be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and implementing land development regulations of the appropriate local governing body; and WHEREAS, Sections 163.3177(6)(h)1 and 2, F.S., require each local government to adopt an intergovernmental coordination element as part of their comprehensive plan that states principles and guidelines to be used in the accomplishment of coordination of the adopted comprehensive plan with the plans of the school boards, and describes the processes for collaborative planning and decisir~~~TIFIED COP1`"' making on population projections and public school siting; and MARYANNE MORSE-' CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT SEMINOLE COUNTY. FLORI01 Page 1 of 41 ~1 8Y / ~ ~-- DEP TY CLERK 177 WHEREAS, Sections 163.3177(7) and 1013.33, F.S., require the County, Cities and School Board to establish jointly the specific ways in which the plans and processes of the School Board and the local governments are to be coordinated; and WHEREAS, Sections 163.3177(7), 163.3180(13), and 1013.33, F.S., require the County, Cities and School Board to update their Public School Interlocal Agreement to establish school concurrency to satisfy Section 163.3180(12)(8)1, F.S.; and WHEREAS, the County and Cities are entering into this Agreement in reliance on the School Board's obligation to prepare, adopt and implement a financially feasible capital facilities program to achieve public schools operating at the adopted level of service consistent with the timing specified in the School Board's Capital Facilities Plan, and the School Board's further commitment to update the plan annually to add enough capacity to the Plan in each succeeding fifth year to address projected growth in order to maintain the adopted level of service and to demonstrate that the utilization of school capacity is maximized to the greatest extent possible pursuant to Section 163.3180(13)(c)2, F.S.; and WHEREAS, the School Board, is entering into this Agreement in reliance on the County and Cities' obligation to adopt amendments to their local comprehensive plans to impose School concurrency as provided in Section 163.3180(13), F.S.; and NOW THEREFORE, be it mutually agreed among the School Board, the County and the Cities (hereinafter referred to collectively as the "Parties") that the following definitions and procedures will be followed in coordinating land use, public school facilities planning, and school concurrency. Page 2 of 41 178 2007 /NTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITYPLANNINGAND SCHOOL CONCURRENCY AS AMENDED JANUARY 2008 Seminole County, Florida Table of Contents SECTION 1 DEFINITIONS ..............................................................................................5 SECTION 2 COMMITTEES AND DUTIES ......................................................................9 2.1 Planning Technical Advisory Committee (PTAC) ....................................................9 2.2 Public Schools Facilities Planning Committee (PSFPC) .........................................9 SECTION 3 STUDENT ENROLLMENT AND POPULATION PROJECTIONS ..........10 3.1 Population and Student Enrollment Projections Distributed Annually ..................10 3.2 Student Projections ........................................................................... .......10 3.3 PTAC Review ........................................................................................................10 SECTION 4 COORDINATING AND SHARING OF INFORMATION ...........................10 4.1 School Board Educational Facilities Work Plan ....................................................10 4.2 Educational Plant Survey .......................................................................................10 SECTION 5 SCHOOL SITE SELECTION, REMODELING, AND SCHOOL CLOSURES ......................................................................:........................10 5.1 New School Sites ..................................................................:................................10 5.2 School site Plan Review ........................................................................................11 5.3 Remodeling and Closures .....................................................................................11 5.4 Joint Consideration of On-Site and Off-Site Improvements ..................................11 SECTION 6 LOCAL PLANNING AGENCIES (LPA), COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS, REZONIN GS, AND DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS...12 6.1 Appointed LPA Members .......................................................................................12 6.2 County and City Development Applications Shared with the School Board.........12 6.3 Criteria for Evaluating Residential Development Applications ..............................12 6.4 Formulating City and County Plans and Programs ...............................................12 SECTION 7 CO-LOCATION AND SHARED USE .......................................................13 7.1 Co-Location and Shared Use ................................................................................13 7.2 Mutual Use Agreement ..........................................................................................13 SECTION 8 SPECIFIC RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARTIES ................................13 8.1 Specific Responsibilities of the County and Cities ................................................13 8.2 Specific Responsibilities of the School Board ....................................................:..14 SECTION 9 SCHOOL BOARD CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN .............................15 9.1 School Board's Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan ...........................................15 9.2 Educational Facilities Work Plan ...........................................................................15 9.3 Transmittal .............................................................................................................15 9.4 Adoption .................................................................................................................15 9.5 Amendments to the School Board's Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan ..........16 Page 3 of 41 179 20071NTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND SCHOOL CONCURRENCY AS AMENDED JANUARY 2008 Seminole County, Florida Table of Contents continued SECTION 10 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ELEMENTS ...................................................16 10.1 Required Comprehensive Plan Amendments ......................................................16 10.2 Development, Adoption, and Amendment of the Capital Improveme nts Element (CIE) .......................................................................................................17 10.3 Development, Adoption, and Amendment of the Public School Facilities Element PSFE) ...................................................................................................................17 SECTION 11 SCHOOL CONCURRENCY PROGRAM ..................................................18 11.1 Commencement of School Concurrency ...............................................................18 11.2 Concurrency Service Areas (CSA) ........................................................................18 11.3 Level of Service (LOS) ...........................................................................................19 11.4 School Concurrency Regulations ..........................................................................19 SECTION 12 UNIFORM SCHOOL CONCURRENCY PROCESS .................................19 12.1 General Provisions .................................................................................................19 12.2 School Concurrency Application Review ...............................................................20 12.3 Methodology ...........................................................................................................21 12.4 Development Review Table ...................................................................................22 12.5 Proportionate Share Mitigation ..............................................................................23 12.6 School Concurrency Approval ...............................................................................25 12.7 Reserved Capacity... ..............................................................................................25 12.8 Appeal Process ......................................................................................................26 SECTION 13 OVERSIGHT ..............................................................................................26 13.1 Oversight ................................................................................................................26 SECTION 14 SPECIAL PROVISION ..............................................................................26 14.1 School Board Requirements ..................................................................................26 14.2 Land Use Authority ................................................................................................27 SECTION 15 AMENDMENT PROCESS, NOTICE, AND TERM OF AGREEMENT.....27 15.1 Amendment of the Agreement ...............................................................................27 15.2 Notice Requirements .............................................................................................27 15.3 Repeal of the Agreement .......................................................................................28 15.4 Termination of the Agreement ...............................................................................28 15.5 Withdrawal .............................................................................................................28 SECTION 16 RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES ..................................................................28 16.1 Dispute Resolution .................................................................................................28 SECTION 17 EXECUTION IN COUNTERPARTS ..........................................................28 17.1 Agreement Execution .............................................................................................28 SECTION 18 SUCCESSION OF AGREEMENT .............................................................28 18.1 Succession of Agreement ......................................................................................28 SECTION 19 EFFECTIVE DATE ....................................................................................28 19.1 Effective Date .........................................................................................................28 Page 4 of 41 180 APPENDIX "A" Concurrency Service Area Maps (CSA) ........................................38 Page S of 41 181 SECTION 1 DEFINITIONS Adjacent Concurrency Service Area: A concurrency service area which is contiguous and touches the boundary of another concurrency service area along one side. Attendance Zone: The geographic area which identifies the public school assignment for students. Building Permit: An approval by a local govemment authorizing residential construction on a specific property. . Capital Outlay, Full Time Equivalent (COFTE) Projections: Florida Department of Education (FDOE) COHORT student enrollment projections for Florida public school districts, issued annually and based on information produced by the demographic, revenue, and education estimating conferences pursuant to s. 216.136 and s. 1013.64(3), as adjusted by the FDOE Office of Educational Facilities and SMART Schools Clearinghouse. The projections do not include students in hospital, homebound, summer school, evening school, etc. since these students do not require an additional student station. Cities: All municipalities in Seminole County, except those that are exempt from the requirements of school concurrency, pursuant to Section 163.3177(12), F.S. Charter School: Public schools of choice which operate under a performance contract, or a "charter," in accordance with Section 1002.33, F.S. Charter schools in the Seminole County Public School District are Countywide schools of choice. Comprehensive Plan: A plan that meets the requirements of Sections 163.3177 and 163.3178, F.S. Concurrency Service Area (CSA): A geographic unit promulgated by the School Board and adopted by local governments within which the level of service is measured when an application for residential development is reviewed for school concurrency purposes. Consistency: Compatible with and furthering the goals, objectives and policies of the County and Cities Comprehensive Plan Elements and this Agreement. Core Facilities: The media center, cafeteria, toilet facilities, circulation space and like areas that do not carry permanent Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) capacity in an educational facility. Developer: Any person, including a .governmental agency, undertaking any construction. ~:.{Y; Development Approval: Site plan, final subdivision or functional equivalent, issued by a local govemment granting, or granting with conditions, a Development Application. Educational Facility: The buildings, equipment, structures, ancillary and special educational use areas that are built, installed or established to serve public school purposes. Educational Facilities Impact Fee: A fee designated to assist in the funding for acquisition and development of school facilities, owned and operated by the School Board, needed to serve new growth and development. Educational Plant Survey: A systematic study approved by the Florida Department of Education (FDOE) of present educational and ancillary plants and the determination of future needs to provide an appropriate educational program and services for each Page6of41 182 student based on projected capital outlay F-fE (COFTE) counts prepared and issued by the FDOE. Encumbered Capacity: School capacity for a proposed project that set aside for a limited amount of time while the proposed project is undergoing eview by the local government. Exempt Local Government: A municipality which is not required to participate in school concurrency when meeting all the requirements for having no significant impact on school attendance, per Section 163.3177(12)(b), F.S. Financial Feasibility: An assurance that sufficient revenues are currently available or will be available from committed funding sources for the first 3 years, or will be available from committed or planned funding sources for years 4 and 5, of a byear capital improvement schedule for financing capital improvements, such as ad valorem taxes, bonds, state and federal funds, tax revenues, impact fees, and developer contributions, which are adequate to fund the projected costs of the capital improvements identified in the comprehensive plan necessary to ensure that adopted level-of-service standards are achieved and maintained within the period covered by the 5year schedule of capital improvements. The requirement that level-of-service standards be achieved and maintained shall not apply if the proportionate-share process set forth in Section 163.3180(12) and (16) is used [ref. 163.3164(32), F.S.j. Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan: The School Board's annually adopted financially feasible, five-year list of capital improvements which provide for student capacity to achieve and maintain the adopted level of service. Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH): Data, inventory and numbering system used by the Florida Department of Education, Office of Educational Facilities for parcels of land, buildings and rooms in public educational facilities (hereinafter referred to as FISH). Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) Student Count: Fall Semester: The fall semester count of all "full-time equivalent" students, pursuant to Chapter 1011.62, F.S. Level of Service Standard (LOS): A standard or condition established to measure utilization within a concurrency service area. Current Level of Service is determined by the sum of the FTE student count at the same type of schools within a concurrency service area, divided by the sum of the permanent FISH capacity of the same type of schools within a concurrency service area. Projected or future Level of Service is determined by the sum of the projected COFTE enrollments at the same type of schools within a concurrency service area, divided by the sum of the planned permanent FISH capacity of the same type of schools within a concurrency service area." Local Governments: Seminole County and its Cities. Maximum School Utilization: The balance of student enrollment system wide, to ensure the most efficient operation of each school within the adopted LOS standard, based on the number of permanent student stations according to the FISH inventory, taking into account the Florida Department of Education (FDOE) utilization factor, special considerations such as, core capacity, special programs, transportation costs, geographic impediments, and the requirements of Article IX, Section 1(a) of the Florida Constitution, to prevent disparate enrollment levels to the greatest extent possible. Modular Classroom: A room designated in FISH within a educational facility which contains student stations and where students receive instruction and which, the life Page 7 of 41 183 expectancy of the structure, also as designated in FISH is 35 - 49 years. Modular classrooms generally consist of pre-manufactured concrete and/or steel type structures owned by the School Board. Permanent School Capacity: The optimal number of students that can be housed for instruction at an educational facility as prescribed in SBE Rule 6A-2.0010, F.A.C. (SREF Section 6.1) in permanent and modular type classroom spaces designated in FISH. A Permanent capacity of an elementary school is equal to the sum of student stations assigned to permanent and modular classrooms at the school. B. Permanent capacity of a middle school is 90% of the sum of student stations assigned to permanent and modular classrooms at the school. C. Permanent capacity of secondary level [high] schools is less than the sum of student stations assigned to permanent and modular classrooms at the school. The amount less is prescribed in SBE Rule 62.0010, F.A.C. (SREF Section 6.1). For high schools exceeding 1500 satisfactory student stations, the school capacity is 95% of the sum of student stations assigned to permanent and modular classrooms at the school. Permanent Classroom: A room designated in FISH within an educational facility which contains student stations and where students receive instruction and which, the life expectancy of the structure, also as designated in FISH, is 50 years or more. Permanent Student Station: A designated space contained within a permanent building or structure that can accommodate a student for an instructional program and is designated satisfactory in FISH data. The total number of permanent student stations at a educational facility is determined by the sum of individual permanent student stations at the facility. Permanent buildings or structure types are designated by the School Board and include permanently constructed buildings having a life expectancy of 50 years or more and modular buildings as identified in FISH, having a life expectancy exceeding 35 years or more. Planning Technical Advisory Committee (PTAC): PTAC was formally created and established by the Inter/ocal Planning Coordination Agreement of 1997. This committee is comprised of planning staff representatives from Seminole County, each of the seven municipal corporations within the County, and the Seminole County School Board. PTAC serves as an advisory committee and working group to enhance intergovernmental coordination of comprehensive plan programs and assists in ensuring consistency between these programs and issues of multi jurisdictional concern. Proportionate Share Mitigation: A developer improvement or contribution identified in a binding and enforceable agreement between the Developer, the School Board and the local government with jurisdiction over the approval of the development approval to provide compensation for the additional demand on educational facilities created through the residential development of the property, as set forth in Section 163.3180(13)(e), F.S. Proposed New Residential Development: Any application for new residential development or any amendment to a previously approved residential development, which results in an increase in the total number of housing units. Public Facilities: Civic capital assets including, but not limited to, transit, sanitary sewer, solid waste, potable water, public schools, parks, libraries and community buildings. Page 8 of 41 184 Public School Concurrency Program: A program established by Seminole County, each of the seven municipal corporations within the County, and the Seminole County School Board to meet the requirements of Sections 163.31777, 163.3180, and 1013.33, F.S. Public Schools Facilities Planning Committee (PSFPC): The PSFPC is created and established by this agreement. This committee is comprised of one elected official, or their designee, from Seminole County, each of the seven municipal corporations within the County, and the Seminole County School Board. The PSFPC is responsible for the oversight of the school Concurrency program established in this agreement, and hears recommendations from PTAC on school planning issues and may make recommendations to the School Board. Relocatable Classroom: A structure with a life expectancy less than 35 years, mobile trailer structures, or transportable wood frame structures. Reserved Capacity: School capacity that is assigned to a proposed project once it has received a Development approval for the project's Development Application. Residential Development: Any development that is comprised of dwelling units, in whole or in part, for permanent human habitation. School Board: The governing body established under Article IX, Section 4, of the Florida Constitution. School Capacity: See permanent school capacity. School Capacity Availability Letter of Determination (SCALD): A letter prepared by the School Board of Seminole County, identifying if school capacity is available to serve a residential project, and if capacity exists, recommending whether the proposed development should be approved or has been vested. School District: The School District of Seminole County is created pursuant to Article IX, Section 4, of the Florida Constitution. School Impact Analysis (SIA) : A formal description of a residential project subject to school Concurrency review provided by the developer for School Board review in accordance with Section 12.1 of this Agreement. Student Station: A satisfactory space contained within a building or structure as designated in FISH that can accommodate a student for an instructional program. Temporary Classroom: Also referred to as a relocatable classroom. A room designated in FISH within ai educational facility which contains student stations and where students receive instruction and which, the life expectancy of the structure, also as designated in FISH, is less than 35 years. Temporary classrooms generally consist of mobile trailer structures or transportable wood frame type structures. Student stations in temporary/relocatable classrooms shall not be considered for the purposes of determining Concurrency or included in any capacity determination of any CSA. Educational Facilities Work Plan: The School Board's annual capital planning document that includes long-range planning for facilities needs over 5-year and 10-year periods. Tiered Level of Service: A level of service which is graduated over time, used to achieve an adequate and desirable level of service at the end of a specified period of time, as permitted by the Florida Statutes. Page 9 of 41 185 Type of School: An educational facility providing the same grade level of education, i.e.: elementary (grades PK-5), middle (grades 68), or high school (grades 312) or special purpose school such as magnet school. Utilization: The comparison of the total number of students enrolled to the total number of permanent student stations as determined by FISH at a school facility. SECTION 2 COMMITTEES AND DUTIES 2.1 Planning Technical Advisory Committee (PTAC). PTAC will meet, at a minimum on asemi-annual basis, in July and January, to discuss issues and formulate recommendations to the PSFPC regarding coordination of land use and school facilities planning, including such issues as population and student projections, development trends, school needs, co-location and joint use opportunities, ancillary infrastructure improvements needed to support the schools, School Board Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan and the Public School Concurrency Program. Representatives from the Regional Planning Council will also be invited to attend. A designee of the School Board shall be responsible for coordinating and convening the semi-annual meeting. 2.2 Public Schools Facilities Planning Committee (PSFPC). The Parties hereby establish a Public Schools .Facilities Planning Committee for the purpose of reviewing recommendations from PTAC on land use and school facilities planning, including such issues as population and student projections, development trends, school needs, co-location and joint use opportunities, ancillary infrastructure improvements needed to support the school, potential sites for new schools, and proposals for significant renovation and potential closure of existing schools. Based on the review of PTAC's recommendations, the PSFPC will submit recommendations to the School Board. Additionally, the PSFPC will be a standing committee to review the School Board Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan in accordance with Sections 4.1 and 10 of this Agreement, and serve as the required oversight committee for the Public School Concurrency Program as detailed in Section 14 of this Agreement. The PSFPC will meet annually in a joint School Board workshop upon receipt of the draft School Board Educational Facilities Work Plan (Work Plan) from the School Board to discuss the Work Plan, submitted to the Department of Education. A representative of the Regional Planning Council will also be invited to attend. The joint workshop will provide the opportunity for the County, the Cities, and the School Board to hear reports, discuss policy, set direction, and reach understandings concerning issues of mutual concern regarding coordination of land use and school facilities planning, including population and student growth, development trends, school needs, off-site improvements, joint use opportunities, and school Concurrency. Page 10 of 41 186 SECTION 3 STUDENT ENROLLMENT AND POPULATION PROJECTIONS 3.1 Population and Student Enrollment Projections Distributed Annually. In fulfillment of their respective planning duties, the County, Cities, and School Board agree to coordinate and base their plans upon consistent projections of the amount, type, and distribution of population growth and student enrollment. At the annual July PTAC meeting described at Subsection 2.1, the County and Cities shall provide updated five year population projections and the School Board will supply the annually updated student enrollment projections. 3.2 Student Projections. The Parties agree to use student population projections per Section 1013.31(1)(b)2, F.S. based on Capital Outlay Full Time Equivalent COFTE) cohort projections issued by FDOE in July of each year. 3.3 PTAC Review. PTAC will review quantity, type and school distribution of COFTE student enrollment projections. SECTION 4 COORDINATING AND SHARING OF INFORMATION 4.1 School Board Educational Facilities Work Plan. By August 1st of each year, the School Board shall submit to the County, each City and the Public Schools Facilities Planning Committee (PSFPC) the School Board Educational Facilities Work Plan prior to adoption by the Board. A. The Plan will be consistent with the requirements of Section 1013.35, F.S., and include projected student populations apportioned geographically, an inventory of existing school facilities, projections of facility space needs, information on relocatables, general locations of new schools for the 5-and 10-year time periods. B. The Plan will also include the financially feasible School Board Capital Improvement Plan fora 5-year period. The Cities and County shall review the plan and provide written comments to the School Board annually prior to September 1st. 4.2 Educational Plant Survey. PTAC will assist the School Board in an advisory capacity in the preparation and update of the Educational Plant Survey. The Educational Plant Survey shall be consistent with the requirements of Section 1013.33, F.S. Upon receipt of the Educational Plant Survey, PTAC will have fifteen (15) calendar days to evaluate and make recommendations regarding the location and need for new schools, significant renovation or expansion, and closures of educational facilities, and the consistency of such plans with the local government comprehensive plan and relevant issues listed in Subsections 5.2, 5.3, 6.1, 7.1, and 8.1 of this Agreement. SECTION 5 SCHOOL SITE SELECTION, REMODELING, AND SCHOOL CLOSURES 5.1 New School Sites. When the need for a new school is identified in the School Board's Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan, PTAC will review a list of potential sites in the area of need. Potential sites for new schools will be submitted to the local government with jurisdiction for an assessment regarding consistency with the local government Comprehensive Plan. This jurisdiction shall have Page 11 of 41 187 20 working days upon receipt of the request to respond with a consistency determination. If the site is consistent with the local govemment comprehensive plan and the School Board authorizes the acquisition of the property, the School Board shall proceed through the appropriate site plan review process. ff a determination is made that a proposed school site is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the local govemment shall identify whether it will support necessary amendments to the comprehensive plan to make the school site consistent. The coordination process shall be in accordance with Chapter 1013.33, F.S. 5.2 School Site Plan Review. Once a school site has been selected and site design has begun, the School Board shall comply with the appropriate site. plan review process set forth within the applicable land development regulations. Nothing in this agreement exempts school sites from the site plan review process and ensuring the site plan is consistent with both the comprehensive plan and land development regulations. Standards and conditions shall not be imposed which conflict with the requirements established in Chapter 1013, F.S. or the Florida Building Code, unless otherwise agreed to by the School Board as a part of this Agreement. A The School Board shall not be required to obtain or condemn public right- of-way from private property owners for the purposes of constructing off- site infrastructure of which it is intended that fee simple title of the acquired right-of--way be transferred to the County or City. B. The County and Cities shall exempt the School Board from the payment of planning and development fees, including but not limited to plan amendment fees, zoning and/or site plan fees, special exception fees, right-of--way utilization fees, permit fees, subdivision fees, and vacate fees, as may be required by the County or Cities in the development review process. The School Board shall be responsible for the payment of fees associated with advertising related public hearings. C. The County and Cities shall accept the St. Johns River Water Management District permit for an educational facility to find that storm water collection, treatment, retention and drainage within a school site is sufficient. If off-site impacts are present, the County or City having jurisdiction may impose conditions on the application as provided in the jurisdiction's land development regulations. 5.3 Remodeling and Closures. When the need for a remodeling project that changes the primary use of a facility, resulting in a greater than 5 percent increase or decrease in student capacity, or the closure of a school has been identified in the School Board Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan, PTAC shall notify the PSFPC and make recommendations on the impacts the renovation or closure will have on the adopted level of service for schools. 5.4 Joint Consideration of On-Site and OffSite Improvements. In conjunction with the land use consistency determination described in Subsection 5.1 of this Agreement, the School Board and the effected local govemment will jointly determine the need for and timing of on-site and off-site improvements necessary to support each new school or the proposed remodeling of an existing school. The School Board and the effected local govemment will agree to the timing, Page 12 of 41 188 location, and the party or parties responsible for financing constructing, operating and maintaining the required improvements. SECTION 6 LOCAL PLANNING AGENCIES (LPA), COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS, REZONINGS, AND DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS 6.1 Appointed LPA Members. The County and Cities will include School Board representative on the local planning agencies, or equivalent agencies, to attend those meetings at which the agendas consider comprehensive plan amendments and rezonings that would, if approved, increase residential density on the property that is the subject of the application. The Cities and County may at their discretion grant voting status to the appointed School Board representative. 6.2 County and City Development Applications Shared with the School Board. The County and the Cities shall give the District Superintendent notification of land use applications and development proposals pending before them that may effect student enrollment, enrollment projections, or school facilities in accordance with Section 12 of this Agreement. Such notice will be provided within 10 working days with receipt of the application. This notice requirement applies to amendments to the comprehensive plan future land use map, rezonings, developments of regional impact, and/or major residential or mixed-use development projects. 6.3 Criteria for Evaluating Residential Development Applications. The County and Cities will consider the following issues, in addition to the review process for school concurrency described in Section 13, when reviewing Comprehensive Plan amendments and rezonings for residential development proposals: A. School Board comments on residential development proposals; B. The provision of school sites and facilities within neighborhoods; C. The compatibility of land uses adjacent to existing schools and reserved school sites; D. The co-location of parks, recreation and neighborhood facilities with school sites; E. The linkage of schools, parks, libraries and other public facilities with bikeways, trails, and sidewalks for safe access; 6.4 Formulating City and County Plans and Programs. In formulating community development plans and programs, the County and Cities will consider the following issues: A. Scheduling of capital improvements that are coordinated with and meet the capital needs identified in the School Board's Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan; B. Providing incentives to the private sector to identify and implement creative solutions to developing adequate school facilities in residential developments; C. Targeting community development improvements in older and distressed neighborhoods near schools; and D. Working to address and resolve multijurisdictional public school issues. Page 13 of 41 189 SECTION 7 CO-LOCATION AND SHARED USE 7.1 Co-Location and Shared Use. The co-location and shared use of facilities are important to both the School Board and local governments. The School Board will seek opportunities to co-locate and share use of school facilities and civic facilities when preparing the Board's Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan. Likewise, co-location and shared use opportunities will be considered by the local governments when preparing the annual update to the Comprehensive Ran's schedule of capital improvements and when planning and designing new, or renovating existing, community facilities. Opportunities for co-location and shared use with public schools will be considered for the following: A Libraries; B. Parks and recreation facilities; C. Community centers; D. Auditoriums; E. Learning centers; F. Museums; G. Performing arts centers; H. Stadiums; and I. Governmental facilities. 7.2 Mutual Use Agreement. For each instance of co-location and shared use, the School Board and local government shall enter into a separate agreement which addresses liability, operating and maintenance costs, scheduling of use, and facility supervision or any other issues that may arise from co-location and shared use. SECTION 8 SPECIFIC RESPONSIBILITIES OFTHE PARTIES 8.1 Specific Responsibilities of the County and Cities. When the Comprehensive Plan amendments adopted in accordance with this Agreement become effective, the County and Cities shall undertake the following activities: A. Adopt the required school concurrency provisions into their Land Development Regulations (LDR) consistent with the time frame established by law, the requirements of this Agreement, and the County and Cities' Comprehensive Rans, unless electing to be bound by the provisions established by the County. B. Withhold the approval of any site plan, final subdivision, or functional equivalent for new residential units not exempted under Section 12.1(C) of this Agreement, until the School Board has reported that there is school capacity available or a mitigation agreement has been reached. C. Share information with the School Board regarding population projections, projections of development and redevelopment for the coming year, infrastructure required to support educational facilities, and amendments to future land use plan elements consistent with the requirements of this Agreement. Page 14 of 41 190 D. Maintain data for approved new residential development. The data shall be provided to the School Board annually by October 15th, and include at a minimum, the following: 1. Development name and location. 2. Total number of dwelling units by unit type as defined in the most recently adopted public schools impact fee ordinance. 3. Impact fee calculation. 4. Total number of dwelling units with certificates of occupancy (CO) by Development. E. Transmit site plans, final subdivision or functional equivalency for approved new residential development upon request by the School Board. 8.2 Specific Responsibilities of the School Board. By entering into this Agreement, the School Board agrees to undertake the following activities: A Annually prepare and update a financially feasible Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan to meet the anticipated demand for student stations identified by the COFTE projections so that no concurrency Service Area exceeds the adopted level of service. B. Consider school attendance boundary adjustments as may be appropriate to maximize the utilization of capacity in order to ensure that all schools of each type (elementary, middle, high) in each concurrency Service Area and each individual school operate at the adopted level of service, consistent with the requirements of this Agreement and School Board Policy 5.30. Initiation of attendance boundaries shall be at the sole discretion of the School Board. C. Construct capacity enhancing and remodeling projects necessary to maintain the adopted level of service consistent with the Five-Year CIP. D. Provide the County and Cities with the required data and analysis updated annually to support the Comprehensive Plan elements and any amendments relating to school concurrency. E. Adopt afive- and ten-year CIP consistent with the requirements of this Agreement. F. Review proposed new residential developments for compliance with concurrency standards, consistent with the requirements of this Agreement. G. Consider and approve proportionate share mitigation options for new residential development as appropriate. H. Prepare annual reports on enrollment and capacity, consistent with the requirements of this Agreement. I. Provide necessary staff and material support for meetings of the PSFPC as required by this Agreement. J. Provide information to the County and Cities regarding enrollment projections, school siting, infrastructure necessary to support educational Page 15 of 41 191 facilities, and amendments to future land use plan elements consistent with the requirements of this Agreement. SECTION 9 SCHOOL BOARD CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 9.1 School Board's Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan. In preparation of the School Board's Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan and each annual update, the School Board shall undertake the following: A. Update and adopt the School Board's Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan for public schools in Seminole County on or before September 30th of each year. B. Specify all new construction, remodeling or renovation projects which will add permanent capacity or modernize existing facilities. C. Prepare the School Board's Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan and each annual update to provide a financially feasible program of school construction for a five (5) year period. D. Include school construction projects which, when completed, will add sufficient permanent capacity to achieve and maintain the adopted LOS standard for all schools based on the projected COFTE enrollment; provide for required modernizations; and satisfy the School Board's constitutional obligation to provide a uniform system of free public schools on a county-wide basis. E. Include a description of each school project, in the School Board's Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan. F. Maximize utilization of existing schools so that proposed projects add the necessary permanent capacity to maintain the adopted Level of Service standard. G. The School Board's Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan and each annual update shall identify the projected enrollment, capacity and utilization percentage of all schools. 9.2 Educational Facilities Work Plan. In addition to the adopted School Board's Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan, the School Board shall annually adopt a five-year and ten-year work plan based upon revenue projections, COFTE enrollment projections and facility needs for the five-year and ten-year period. ft is recognized that the projections in the five- and ten-year time frames are tentative and should be used only for general planning purposes. Upon completion, the Educational Facilities Work Plan will be transmitted to the local governments. 9.3 Transmittal. The School Board shall transmit to the County, the local governments and the PSFPC copies of the proposed Educational Facilities Work Plan and the Five-Year CIP for review and comment. Transmittal to the PSFPC, the Cities and the County shall occur on or before August 1st of each year commencing after the effective date of this Agreement. 9.4 Adoption. Unless the adoption is delayed by mediation or a lawful challenge, the School Board shall adopt their Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan no later than September 30th, and it shall become effective no later than October 1st of each year. Page 16 of 41 192 9.5 Amendments to the School Board's Five Year Capital Improvement Plan. The School Board shall not amend the School Board's Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan so as to modify, delay or delete any project in the first three 3) years of the Plan unless the School Board, with the concurrence of a majority vote by its Board members, provides written confirmation that: A The modification, delay or deletion of a project is required in order to meet the School Board's constitutional obligation to provide acounty-wide uniform system of free public schools or other legal obligations imposed by state or federal law; or B. The modification, delay or deletion of a project is occasioned by unanticipated change in enrollment projections or growth patterns or is required in order to provide needed capacity in a location that has a current greater need than the originally planned location and does not cause the adopted LOS to be exceeded in the Concun'ency Service Area from which the originally planned project is modified, delayed or deleted; or C. The project schedule or scope has been modified to address local government concerns, and the modification does not cause the adopted LOS to be exceeded in the Concurrency Service Area from which the originally planned project is modified, delayed or deleted; and D. The PSFPC, as the required oversight committee for school concurrency as detailed in Section 14 of this Agreement, has had the opportunity to review the proposed amendment and has submitted its recommendation to the Superintendent or designee. E. The School Board may amend at anytime its Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan to add necessary capacity projects to satisfy the provisions of this Agreement. For additions to the Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan, the School Board must demonstrate its ability to maintain the financial feasibility of the Plan. SECTION 10 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ELEMENTS 10.1 Required Comprehensive Plan Amendments. The County and the Cities agree to adopt the following Comprehensive Plan amendments no later than January 1, 2008. A An amended Capital Improvement Element (CIE) that includes the portion of the adopted School Board's Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan dealing with capacity improvements. The amended information shall be included in the next Comprehensive Plan amendment, but no later than December 1st, following the annual adoption of the Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan by the School Board. This will ensure that the CIE uniformly sets forth a financially feasible public school capital facilities program, consistent with the adopted Level of Service standards for public schools. B. A Public School Facilities Element (PSFE) consistent with the requirements of Sections 163.3177(12) and 163.3180, F.S. and this Agreement. Page 17 of 41 193 C. An amended Intergovernmental Coordination Element as required by Section 163.3177(6)(h)1 and 2, F.S. and this Agreement. D. Each jurisdiction's amendments shall be consistent with this Agreement, and those adopted by the other jurisdictions as required by Section 163.3180, F.S. 10.2 Development, Adoption, and Amendment of the Capital Improvements Element (CIE). An annual update or any amendment to the School Board's Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan by the School Board, once adopted by the School Board, shall be transmitted to the County and the Cities. The County and the Cities shall adopt the capacity portions of the School Board's Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan into the Capital Improvement Element of their Comprehensive Plans. A. The County and the Cities, by adopting the capacity portions of "The Seminole County Public School's Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan" in the Capital Improvements Element of the Local Government's Comprehensive Plan, shall have neither the obligation nor the responsibility for funding or accomplishing the School Board Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan. 10.3 Development, Adoption, and Amendment of the Public School Facilities Element (PSFE). The County and the Cities shall adopt a Public School Facilities Element which is consistent with those adopted by the other local governments within the County. The PSFE must also be consistent with this Agreement, Chapter 163.3177(12), F.S., and Rule 9J-5.025, F.A.C. The County and the Cities shall notify the PSFPC when this element is adopted and when the element becomes effective. A In the event that it becomes necessary to amend the PSFE, the local government wishing to initiate an amendment shall request review through the PSFPC prior to transmitting the amendment to the Department of Community Affairs pursuant to Section 163.3184, F.S. The PSFPC shall be responsible for distributing the amendment to all Parties to this Agreement for review and comment. 1. To achieve required consistency, all local governments shall adopt the amendment in accordance with the statutory procedures for amending comprehensive plans. 2. If any local government objects to the amendment and the dispute cannot be resolved between or among the Parties, the dispute shall be resolved in accordance with the provisions set forth in this Agreement. In such a case, the Parties agree not to adopt the amendment until the dispute has been resolved. B. Any local issues not specifically required by Statute or Rule in the PSFE may be included or modified in the Local Government PSFE by following the normal Comprehensive Plan amendment process. Page 18 of 41 194 SECTION 11 SCHOOL CONCURREN CY PROGRAM 11.1 Commencement of School Concurrency. The School Concurrency Program described in this Agreement shall commence on January 1, 28A8 2008. 11.2 Concurrency Service Areas (CSA). The Parties hereby agree that School Concurrency shall be measured and applied using a geographic area known as a Concurrency Service Area (CSA) which coincides with groupings of school attendance zones within each school type based on adjacency, as established in this Agreement. The mapping of the CSAs shall be included in the data and analysis of the Public School Facilities Element and are provided in Appendix "A" of this Agreement. A CSAs will be described geographically in the Comprehensive Plan pursuant to Section 163.3180 (13)(g)(5), F.S. Maps of the CSA boundaries v-ill be included as support documents as defined in Rule 9J-5.003, FAC and may be updated from time to time by the School Board. B. The County and Cities shall adopt the standards for modification of the Concurrency Service Area maps as defined here into the PSFE of the Comprehensive Plan based upon School Board Policy 5.30, titled Student Assignment". C. As future school attendance zone changes are required for schools programmed in the Seminole School Board Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan, the CSAs shall be modfied to the greatest extent possible to provide maximum utilization. D. Any Party may propose a change to the CSA boundaries. Prior to adopting any change, the School Board must verify that as a result of the change: 1. The adopted level of service standards will be achieved and maintained for each year of the five-year planning period; and 2. The utilization of school capacity will be maximized to the greatest extent possible, taking into account transportation costs, and other relevant factors. E. The Parties shall observe the following process for modifying CSA maps: 1. Changes in school attendance boundaries shall be governed by School Board Policy 5.30, Section 120.54 F.S. and applicable uniform rules for administrative proceedings. 2. At such time as the School Board determines that a school(s) attendance boundary is appropriate considering the above standards, the School Board shall transmit the revised attendance zones or CSAs and data and analysis to support the changes b the Cities, to the County, and to the PSFPC. 3. The County, Cities, and PSFPC shall review the proposed amendment within the times prescribed by Section 120.54 F.S. 4. The change to a Concurrency Service Area boundary shall conform to revised attendance boundaries and become effective upon final adoption. Page 19 of 41 195 F. Charter schools and magnet schools will not have their own CSA. Charter and magnet schools are open to all students residing within the district and students are generally accepted through application approval. These special public schools vary in size, and may target a specific type of student and can limit the age groups or grade levels. 11.3 Level of Service (LOS) Standard. To ensure the capacity of schools is sufficient to support student growth, the County, Cities and School Board shall adopt a LOS standard for schools. The Parties hereby agree that the desired LOS standard shall be 100% of the aggregate permanent FISH capacity for each school type within each CSA. To financially achieve the desired LOS standard at the high school level, a tiered LOS standard is established as follows: 200&2012 Elementary and Middle School CSA High School CSA 100% of Permanent FISH Capacity 110% of Permanent FISH Capacity Beginning 2013 100% of Permanent FISH Capacity 100% of Permanent FISH Capacity 11.4 School Concurrency Regulations. Each Local Govemment shall adopt school Concurrency provisions into its land development regulations (LDRs) consistent with the requirements of this Agreement. A The County and the Cities shall amend their LDRs to adopt school Concurrency provisions for the review of development approvals. 1. In the event that any participating City does not adopt LDRs within 18 months, that govemment shall be deemed to have "opted in" to the County regulations and agrees to be bound by the terms and provisions therein until it adopts its own ordinance. 2. At any time, any Local Government may opt out of fie County's implementing ordinance through implementing its own ordinance. SECTION 12 UNIFORM SCHOOL CONCURRENCY PROCESS 12.1 General Provisions. The County, the Cities and the School Board shall ensure that the Level of Service Standard established for each school type is maintained. A. No site plan, final subdivision, or functional equivalent for new residential development may be approved by the County or Cities, unless the residential development is exempt from these requirements as provided in Section 12.1(C) of this Agreement, or until a School Capacity Availability Letter Determination (SCALD) has been issued by the School Board to the local government indicating that adequate school facilities exist. B. A local government may condition the approval of the residential development to ensure that necessary school facilities are in place. Page 20 of 41 196 This shall not limit the authority of a local govemment to deny a site plan, final subdivision or its functional equivalent, pursuant to its home rule regulatory powers. C. The following residential uses shall be considered exempt from the requirements of school concurrency: 1. All residential lots of record at the time the School concurrency implementing ordinance becomes effective. 2. Any new residential development that has a site plan approval, final subdivision or the functional equivalent for a site specific development approval prior to the commencement date of the School concurrency Program. 3. Any amendment to any previously approved residential development, which does not increase the number of dwelling units or change the type of dwelling units (single-family, multi-family, etc.). 4. Any age restricted community with no permanent residents under the age of eighteen (18). An age restricted community shall be subject to a restrictive covenant on all residential units limiting the age of permanent residents to 18 years and older. D. Upon request by a developer submitting a land development application with a residential component, the School Board shall issue a determination as to whether or not a development, lot or unit is exempt from the requirements of school concurrency and submit a copy of the determination to the local govemment within 10 days. 12.2 School concurrency Application Review Q Any developer submitting a development permit application (such as site plan or final subdivision) with a residential component that is not exempt under Section 12.1(C) of this Agreement is subject to school concurrency and shall prepare and submit a School Impact Analysis (SIA) to the School Board for review. B. The SIA shall indicate the location of the development, the number of dwelling units by unit type (single-family detached, single family attached, multi-family, apartments), a phasing schedule (if applicable), and age restrictions for occupancy (if any). The School Board concurrency test shall follow the following steps: 1. -Test Submittal. The developer shall submit a SIA to the School Board with a copy to the local government with jurisdiction over the proposed development. The completed SIA must be submitted a minimum of five working days but not more than 30 days prior to Development Application submittal to the local government. The School Board shall perform a sufficiency review on the SIA application. An incomplete SIA application will be returned to the Owner/Developer without processing. The School Board will have 20 working days to determine sufficiency and complete the Test Review. The School Board may charge the applicant anon-refundable application fee payable to the School Page 21 of 41 197 Board to meet the cost of review in accordance with Florida Statutes. 2. Test Review. Each SIA application will be reviewed in the order in which it is received by the School Board. 3. Passing the Test If the available capacity of public schools for each type within the CSA [or contiguous CSAs as provided for in 12.3(C) below] containing the proposed project is equal to or greater than the proposed project's needed capacity, the concurrency test is passed. The School Board will issue a School Capacity Availability Letter of Determination (SCALD) identifying the school capacity available to serve the proposed project and that said capacity has been encumbered for the proposed project for a period of one year. A capacity encumbrance fee will be established during the regulatory phase of this process. 4. Failing fhe Test. If the available capacity of public schools for any type within the CSA (or contiguous CSAs as provided for in 12.3(C) below) containing the proposed project is less than the proposed project's needed capacity, the concurrency test is failed. The School Board will issue a School Capacity Availability Letter of Determination (SCALD) and inform the developer. ff capacity is not available the School Board will advise the developer of the following options: a. Accept a 30 day encumbrance of available school capacity, and within the same 30 day period, amend the Development Application to balance it with the available capacity; or b. Accept a 60 day encumbrance of available school capacity, and within the same 60 day period, negotiate with the School Board and the local government on a Proportionate Share Mitigation plan as outlined in Section 12.5 below; or c. Appeal the results of the failed test pursuant to the provisions in Section 12.8 below; or d. Withdraw the SIA application. 5. Test Abandonment. If no option under Section 12.2(8)(4) above is exercised by the developer within 45 days, then the application shall be deemed abandoned. 12.3 Methodology. The methodology for performing the concurrency test shall follow the steps outlined below: A To determine a proposed development's projected students, the proposed development's projected number and type of residential units shall be converted into projected students for all schools of each type within the specific CSA using the adopted Student Generation Multiplier, as established in the most current adopted Seminole County BCC Public School Impact Fee Ordinance. Page 22 of 41 198 B. New school capacity within a CSA which is in place or under actual construction in the first three years of the School Board's Capital Improvement Plan will be added to the capacity shown in the CSA, and is counted as available capacity for the residential development under review. C. If the projected student growth from a residential development causes the adopted LOS to be exceeded in the CSA, an adjacent CSA which is contiguous with and touches the boundary of, the concurrency service area within which the proposed development is located shall be evaluated for available capacity. An adjacency evaluation review shall be conducted as follows: 1. In conducting the adjacency review, the School Board shall first use the adjacent CSA with the most available capacity to evaluate projected enrollment impact and, if necessary, shall continue to the next adjacent CSA with the next most available capacity. 2. Consistent with Rule 6A-3.0171, F.A.C., at no time shall the shift of impact to an adjacent CSA result in a total morning or afternoon transportation time of either elementary or secondary students to exceed fifty (50) minutes or one (1) hour, respectively. The transportation time shall be determined by the School Board transportation routing system and measured from the school the impact is to be assigned, to the center of the subject parcel/plat in the amendment application, along the most direct improved pubic roadway free from major hazards. 12.4 Development Review Table. The School Board shall create and maintain a Development Review Table (DRT) for each CSA, and will use the DRT to compare the projected students from proposed residential developments to the CSAs available capacity programmed within the first three years of the current five-year capital planning period. A Student enrollment projections shall be based on the most recently adopted School Board Capital Facilities Work Program, and the DRT shall be updated to reflect these projections. Available capacity shall be derived using the following formula: Available Capacity =School Capacity' - (Enrollment2 + Approved') Where: School Capacity =Permanent School Capacity as programmed in the first three (3) years of the School Board's Five-Year CIP. ZEnrollment =Student enrollment as counted at the Fall FTE. Approved =Students generated from approved residential developments after the implementation of school concurrency. B. Using the Fall FTE, the vested number of students on the DRT will be reduced by the number of students represented by the residential units that received certificates of occupancy within the previous twelve (12) month period. Page 23 of 41 199 12.5 Proportionate Share Mitigation. In the event there is not available school capacity to support a development, the School Board shall entertain proportionate share mitigation options and, if accepted, shall enter into an enforceable and binding agreement with the developer to mitigate the impact from the development through the creation of additional school capacity. A When the anticipated student impacts from a proposed development cause the adopted LOS to be exceeded, the developer's proportionate share will be based on the number of additional student stations necessary to achieve the established LOS. The amount to be paid will be calculated by the cost per student station for elementary, middle and high school as determined and published by the State of Florida. B. The methodology used to calculate a developer's proportionate share mitigation shall be as follows: Proportionate Share =('Development students -Available Capacity) x ZTotal Cost per student station Where: Development students = fiose students from the development that are assigned to a CSA and have triggered a deficiency of the available capacity. ZTotal Cost =the cost per student station as determined and published by the State of Florida. C. The applicant shall accept a 90 day encumbrance of available school capacity, and within the same 90 day period enter into negotiations with the School Board in an effort to mitigate the impact from the development through the creation of additional capacity. Upon identification and acceptance of a mitigation option deemed financially feasible by the School Board, the developer shall enter into a binding and enforceable development agreement with the School Board. 1. A mitigation contribution provided by a developer to offset the impact of a residential development must be directed by the School Board toward a school capacity project identified in the School Board's Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan. Capacity enhancing projects identified within the first three (3) years of the Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan shall be considered as committed in accordance with Section 9.5 of this Agreement. 2. If capacity projects are planned in years four (4) or five (5) of the School Board's Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan within the same CSA as the proposed residential development, the developer may pay his proportionate share to mitigate the proposed development in accordance with the formula provided in Section 12.5(8) of this Agreement. 3. If a capacity project does not exist in the Capital Improvement Plan, the School Board will add a capacity project to satisfy the impacts from a proposed residential development, if it is funded through the developer's proportionate share mitigation Page 24 of 41 200 contributions. Mitigation options may include, but are not limited to: a. Contribution of land or payment for land acquisition suitable for and in conjunction with, the provision of additional school capacity; or b. Mitigation banking based on the construction of a educational facility in exchange for the right to sell capacity credits; or c. Provide modular or permanent student stations acceptable for use as an educational facilities; or d. Provide additional student stations through the remodeling of existing buildings acceptable for use as an educational facility; or e. Construction or expansion of permanent student stations at the impacted school within the CSA; or f. Construction of a educational facility in advance of the time set forth in the School Board's Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan. D. For mitigation measures (a) thru (f) above, the estimated cost to construct the mitigating capacity will reflect the estimated future construction costs at the time of the anticipated construction. Improvements contributed by the developer shall receive school impact fee credit. E. Developer shall receive an impact fee credit for the proportionate share mitigation. Credits will be given for that portion of the impact fees that would have been used to fund the improvements on which the proportionate fair share contribution was calculated. The portion of impact fees available for the credit will be based on the historic distribution of impact fee funds to the school type . (elementary, middle, high) in the appropriate CSA. Impact fee credits shall be calculated at the same time as the applicant's proportionate share obligation is calculated. Any school impact fee credit based on proportionate fair share contributions for a proposed development cannot be transferred to any other parcel or panels of real property within the CSA. F. A proportionate share mitigation contribution shall not be subsequently amended or refunded after final site plan or plat approval to reflect a reduction in planned or constructed residential density. G. Impact fees shall be credited against the proportionate share mitigation total. H. Any proportionate share mitigation must be directed by the School Board toward a school capacity improvement identified in the School Board's Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan. I. Upon conclusion of the negotiation period, a second Determination Letter shall be issued. If mitigation is agreed to, the School Board shall issue a new Determination Letter approving the development subject to those mitigation measures agreed to by the local government, developer and Page 25 of 41 201 the School Board. Prior to, site plan approval, final subdivision approval or the functional equivalent, the mitigation measures shall be memorialized in an enforceable and binding agreement with the local government, the School Board and the Developer that specifically details mitigation provisions to be paid for by the developer and the relevant terms and conditions. If mitigation is not agreed to, the Determination Letter shall detail why any mitigation proposals were rejected and why the development is not in compliance with school Concurrency requirements. A SCALD indicating either that adequate capacity is available, or that there is not a negotiated proportionate share mitigation settlement following the ninety (90) day negotiation period as described in Section 12.5(C) of this Agreement, constitutes final agency action by the School Board for purposes of Chapter 120, F.S. 12.6 School Concurrency Approval. Issuance of a SCALD by the School Board identifying that adequate capacity exists indicates only that school facilities are currently available, and capacity for the proposed development has been encumbered. Capacity will not be reserved until the local government issues a Development Approval. A. A local government shall not issue a Development Approval for a residential development until receiving confirmation of available school capacity in the form of a SCALD from the School Board. The Development Approval shall include a reference to the findings of the SCALD indicating that the project meets school Concurrency. B. Local governments shall notify the School Board within ten (10) working days of any official change in the validity (status) of a Development Approval for a residential development. C. The Local Govemment shall not issue a building permit or its functional equivalent fora non-exempt residential development until receiving confirmation of available school capacity from the School Board in the form of a SCALD. Once the local government has issued a final development approval, school Concurrency for the residential development shall be valid for the life of the final development approval. 12.7 Reserved Capacity. School capacity will be reserved when there is a final disposition of the Development Application by the local government. If the local government approves the Development Application by means of a Development Approval, or its equivalent, the School Board shall move the school capacity from encumbered status to reserved status for the proposed project When the local government issues a Development approval for a residential project it shall notify the School Board within 10 working days. The duration for which capacity is reserved shall be subject to the respective municipality's Land Development Code, but shall not exceed two years from the date of approval or the issuance of a building permit, whichever occurs first. If the building permit once issued expires under the development regulations of the local govemment, the project will lose its reserved capacity. Should a Development Approval for a residential development expire, the subject municipality shall notify the School Board. A capacity reservation fee will be established during the regulatory phase of this process. Page 26 of 41 202 12.8 Appeal Process. A person substantially affected by a School Board's adequate capacity determination made as a part of the School Concurrency Process may appeal such determination through the process provided in Chapter 120, F.S. SECTION 13 OVERSIGHT 13.1 Oversight. The PSFPC will serve as the required oversight committee for school concurrency to monitor and evaluate the school concun'ency program. The committee shall appoint a chairperson, meet at a minimum, semi-annually in mid-September and mid-March in accordance with the laws of Florida governing public meetings, and report to participating local governments, the School Board and the general public on the effectiveness with which this Agreement is being implemented. A representative of the School Board shall be responsible for coordinating the semiannual meeting. Q The monitoring and evaluation of the school concurrency process is required pursuant to Section 163.3180(13)(g)(6)(c), F.S., and Section 2 of this Agreement. The PSFPC shall be responsible for preparing an annual assessment report on the effectiveness of the School Concurrency System. The report will be made available to the public and presented at the PSFPC March meeting. B. The PSFPC members shall be invited to attend all meetings referenced in Section 2 and shall receive copies of all reports and documents produced pursuant to this Agreement. The PSFPC shall evaluate the effectiveness of the CSAs for measuring the LOS and consider making recommendations toamend the CSA Map. C. By August 1st of each year, the PSFPC shall receive the proposed School Board's District Educational Facilities Work Plan and the Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan. -fhe PSFPC will report to the School Board, the County, and the Cities on whether or not the proposed Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan maintains the adopted Level of Service in each CSA by adding enough projects to increase the capacity. The PSFPC will examine the need to eliminate any permanent student station shortfalls by including required modernization of existing facilities, and by providing permanent student stations for the projected growth in enrollment over each of the five (5) years covered by the plan. SECTION 14 SPECIAL PROVISIONS 14.1 School Board Requirements. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the School Board is or may be subject to the requirements of the Florida and United States Constitutions and other state or federal statutes regarding the operation of the public school system and the rules by the State Board of Education or Commissioner of Education. Accordingly, the County, the Cities and the School Board agree that this Agreement is not intended, and will not be construed, to interfere with, hinder, or obstruct in any manner, the School Board's constitutional and statutory obligation and sovereignty to provide a uniform system of free public schools on a Countywide basis or to require the School Board to confer with, or obtain the Page 27 of 41 203 consent of, the County or the Cities, as to whether that obligation has been satisfied. Further, the County, the Cities and the School Board agree that this Agreement is not intended and will not be construed to impose any duty or obligation on the County or City for the School Board's constitutional or statutory obligation. The County and the Cities also acknowledge that the School Board's obligations under this Agreement may be superseded by state or federal court orders or other state or federal legal mandates. 14.2 Land Use Authority. The Parties specifically acknowledge that each Local Govemment is responsible for approving or denying comprehensive plan amendments and development approvals within its own jurisdiction. Nothing herein represents or authorizes a transfer of any of this authority to the School Board. SECTION 15 AMENDMENT PROCESS, NOTICE, AND TERM OF AGREEMENT 15.1 Amendment of the Agreement. This Agreement may be amended by written consent of all parties to this Agreement. The Agreement will remain in effect until amended in accordance with Florida Statutes. 15.2 Notice Requirements. Any notices provided pursuant to this Agreement shall be sent to the following addresses: City Manager City of Altamonte Springs 225 Newburyport Avenue Altamonte Springs, Florida 32701 City Manager City of Sanford 300 North Park Avenue Sanford, Florida 32771 City Manager City of Casselberry 95 Triplet Lake Drive Casselberry, Florida 32707 City Manager City of Lake Mary 100 North Country Club Road Lake Mary, Florida 32746 City Manager City of Longwood 175 West Warren Avenue Longwood, Florida 32750 City Manager City of Oviedo 400 Alexandria Boulevard Oviedo, Florida 32765 City Manager City of Winter Springs 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 County Manager Seminole County Govemment 1101 East First Street Sanford, Florida 32771 School Board Superintendent Seminole County School Board 400 East Lake Mary Boulevard Sanford, Florida 32773 Page 28 of 41 204 15.3 Repeal of the Agreement. If the Florida Statute as it pertains to school planning coordination and school concurrency is repealed, the Agreement may be terminated by written consent of all parties of this Agreement. 15.4 Termination of the Agreement. No parry to this Agreement may terminate its participation in the agreement except through the exemption process in which a municipality may not be required to participate in school concurrency when demonstrating that all the requirements are no longer having a significant impact on school attendance, per Section 163.3177(12}(b), F.S., at the time of a local government Evaluation and Appraisal Report, by providing a sixty (60) day written notice to at other parties and to the Florida Department of Community Affairs. 15.5 Withdrawal. Withdrawal from the Agreement by any party shall not alter the terms of the Agreement with respect to the remaining signatories. SECTION 16 RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES 16.1 Dispute Resolution. If the parties to this Agreement are unable to resolve any issue in which they may be in disagreement covered in this Agreement, such dispute will be resolved in accordance with governmental conflict resolution procedures specified in Chapter 164, F.S. SECTION 17 EXECUTION IN COUNTERPARTS 17.1 Agreement Execution. This Agreement shall be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which so executed shall be deemed to be original, but all such counterparts shall, together, constitute but one in the same instrument. SECTION 18 SUCCESSION OF AGREEMENT 18.1 Succession of Agreement. This Agreement supersedes any previous agreements regarding public school facilities planning upon the effective date of this agreement. SECTION 19 EFFECTIVE DATE 19.1 Effective Date. This Agreement becomes effective as of January 1, 2008. Page 29 of 41 205 ATTEST: CITY OF ALTAMONTE SPRINGS By: PATSY WRIGH ,City Clerk RUSSEL HAUCK, Mayor Date: _ j ~ d s ~. ,... ~(~'~ g ~~~s2o got ~ - r.~.ri:~;~ , I hereby attest and certify this is true and correct copy of the c;riginal r cor ` Sign Deputy C' y erk Date ~ ~ 10- c~c6 ' 2007 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND SCHOOL CONCURRENCYAS AMENDED JANUARY 2008 Seminole County, Florida Page 30 of 41 206 ATTEST:CIT THELMA MCPHERSON, City Clerk Date 2007 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND SCHOOL CONCURRENCYAS AMENDED JANUARY 2008 Seminole County, Florida Page 31 of 41 207 ATTEST:CITY OF LAKE a~.l4Q`:c By: ROL FOS"fER, City Clerk Date: ~GknLlCtr 5/ ~ ~ a2~ 2007 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND SCHOOL CONCURRENCYAS AMENDED JANUARY 2008 Seminole County, Florida Page 32 of 41 208 ATTEST: CITY OF LONGWOOD 1M ll~v SARAH M. MIRUS, City Clerk C. GO ,Mayor Date: ~ ~ ~ ~a3 ?-GY~~ 2007 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND SCHOOL CONCURRENCYAS AMENDED JANUARY 2008 Seminole County, Florida Page 33 of 41 209 ATTEST: ARBAR ARBOUR, City Clerk Q ~ s ,.i~ • ii f••osa•l ~1 , ,~. r*'~' w CITY OF OVIEDO By: _ ~~o,~L , MARY ANDREWS, Mayor Date: as aoo 8 2007 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND SCHOOL CONCURRENCYAS AMENDED JANUARY 2008 Seminole County, Florida Page 34 of 41 210 ATTEST: u~~ ANET R. DOUGHER ,City CI k CITY OF SANFORD Y ` - ~ ~ "~ ~ -~ - LINDA KUj-IN, Mayor ~~ Date: °~ O) °~ ~~ 2007 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND SCHOOL CONCURRENCYAS AMENDED JANUARY 2008 Seminole County, Florida Page 35 of 41 211 ATT ST: CITY OF WINTER SPR~{'~{GS EA LORENZO-LUACES JO F. BUS:-~, Mayor ~ __ City Clerk - Date: January 1 ~ , 200€i 2007 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND SCHOOL CONCURRENCYAS AMENDED JANUARY 2008 Seminole County, Florida Page 36 of 41 212 ATTEST: D A LORENZO-LUACES City"Clerk CITY OF WINTSR SPRINGS By: ~., ~~ ~GlC~t, - JOH . BUSM, ~~Aayar Date: January 14, 2008 2007 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND SCHOOL CONCURRENCYAS AMENDED JANUARY 2008 Seminole County, Florida Page 36 of 41 213 Attest: DR. BILL VOGEL, erintendent SEMINOLE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD ir~ ~~~~1By: ~ DIANE BAUER, Chairman Date: January 8, 2008 2007 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND SCHOOL CONCURRENCY Seminole County, Florida As Amended As To Date of Implementation 214 ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA v By: MORS BR NDA CAREY, Chairman C rk tiSthe Board of County Commissioners of Seminole County, Florida. Date: o~ ~ As authorized for execution by the Board of County Comm'ssioners at their,200 regular meeting. 2007 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND SCHOOL CONCURRENCYAS AMENDED JANUARY 2008 Seminole County, Florida Page 38 of 41 215 APPENDIX "A" Concurrency Service Area Maps (CSA) Elementary Schoo! Concurrency Service Areas !n Seminole Countyiu ~'J ~MIaD Elements 9e~evey idfac! Loubms Abm Rands EJtyrfnrtary Scholl CSAa feA_H'JMfiER Dot E•e p E-: E_a M~/IIS(rtt IUS hc~ • A Ham dtwt QC! BM1Ry M r 'Itl I hrow eY Mi~vay Q E-' NAcklerw Pine DE-E c.e:, E•~~0~. E•6 r L v+t LZe ta 1Aary Q LaY E F_SJ° E,$ Geneva HighlaUA wooa!an lAk• Jesup E-i e sa6a1 g Layer Pcivt E•7 Wekiva N5i'. E•3sep. ~f Fa11st Akanc•.ne K erh E-6 lift' ,Bear se~fjei ferlinp iPar O Lake SPr'UB Rarnlww La Fe to siron•pa! -Reo '~ v,f„t, E YYa 16er tatt eye ~.Tt„ E-2 E•4 Evans - C .O7J '4 CC] ^9 CCJ c: S,J •t C~C1 eet Page 39 of 41 216 APPENDIX "A" Cont. Concurrency Service Area Maps (CSA) iU ~ Middle School Concurrent Service Areas in Seminole Counr, r ri E~~ µoat six LPGR xti b~c •oaa M~ddla 9ohod CSAt fSA_NUMBER Q Ott V^-.4`- ol 5x•1 ~'d Markham 1V~dt M~~ Mlle+rnum e / la-k~ J~SUP M•4 M•2 RxkL M-3 l~~~la'T~~,Is Jackson HeBhtc 5ou:h Senr.~~le T~apw ~Lawton Chibt Tuskawftla 4N Page 40 of 41 217 APPENDIX "A" Cont. Concurrency Service Area Maps (CSA) Page 41 of 41 218 REGULAR AGENDA ITEM 501 CITY COMMISSION AGENDA | NOVEMBER 8, 2021 REGULAR MEETING TITLE Appointment Opportunities for City Boards and Committees SUMMARY The City Clerk Department wishes to inform the City Commission of the following vacancies: Per Section 2-41(e) of the City Code, "If any commissioner fails to appoint a member within thirty (30) days after a vacancy occurs or a term expires, that seat shall be filled by a majority vote of the commission." CURRENT VACANCIES: Districting Commission Seat One - One (1) appointment remaining Seat Two - One (1) appointment remaining Seat Four - One (1) appointment remaining Seat Five - One (1) appointment remaining Mayor - Two (2) appointments remaining Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee Two (2) At-Large Appointments - Terms expired Nov 1, 2021. Current appointees are Mr. Andrew Zacharias and Mr. James Kennedy. Mr. Kennedy does not wish to be reappointed. Mr. Zacharias has applied for reappointment. Youth Council Seat One - One (1) appointment remaining - OPEN TO FULL COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Commission make any appointments they deem pertinent. 219