Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2021 09 13 City Commission Regular Meeting Agenda
CITY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AGENDA MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 2021 - 6:30 PM CITY HALL - COMMISSION CHAMBERS 1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434, WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 1 CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Invocation Pledge of Allegiance Agenda Changes AWARDS AND PRESENTATIONS 100. Police Department Presentations INFORMATIONAL AGENDA 200. Current Development Projects Summary Projects Summary PUBLIC INPUT Anyone who wishes to speak during Public Input on any Agenda Item or subject matter will need to fill out a “Public Input” form. Individuals will limit their comments to three (3) minutes, and representatives of groups or homeowners' associations shall limit their comments to five (5) minutes, unless otherwise determined by the City Commission. CONSENT AGENDA 300. Police Equipment Donation 301. Resolution 2021-23 recognizing the retirement of CCSA Catherine A. Presley from the Police Department. RESOLUTION 2021-23 Presley Retirement 302. Agreement Extension with Eola Technology Partners, LLC. Eola Managed Services Agreement Eola_First_Addendum-2021_PDF.pdf 303. American Rescue Plan Act Corona Virus Fiscal Recovery Funding "Draft" Agreement with the State of Florida and Resolution 2021-24 Establishing New "ARPA" Special Revenue Fund RESOLUTION NO 2021-24 ARPA Fund.pdf Winter Springs City of-American Rescue Plan-Draft funding agreement v1.pdf ARPA Divsion Memorandum.pdf ARPA INTERIM FINAL RULE - Federal Register Vol.86 No.93 5-17-21 304. Torcaso Restrooms South Side Torcaso Flamingo restroom estimate.xlsx Torcaso Restroom and Utility Pavilion 2 305. Purchase of new security camera system 306. Purchase of new GPS vehicle fleet management system Telematics-GPS Tracking Comparison ChartV5-CC.xlsx Samsara-Final-Quote-May 19.pdf 307. Minutes from the Wednesday, July 7, 2021 City Commission Workshop Minutes 308. Minutes from the Monday, August 9, 2021 City Commission Regular Meeting Minutes PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA 400. Tentative Millage Rate for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 and Related Advertising Resolution 2021-12 Adopt Tentative Millage Rate.pdf 401. Tentative Budget for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 and Related Advertising Resolution 2021-13 Adopt Tentative Budget Tentative FY 2022 Budget v08.31.21 revisions v2 402. Review of Ordinance 2021-06 an Ordinance of the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, amending the text of the City’s Comprehensive Plan to include a Property Rights Element as required by law; providing for the repeal of prior inconsistent ordinances and resolutions, incorporation into the comprehensive plan, severability and an effective date and legal status of the plan amendment. Ordinance 2021-06 Property Rights Element Ordinance 2021-06 Legal Ad 403. Chase Bank - Aesthetic Plan Review, one Waiver, Final Engineering Review, and Development Agreement. Chase Bank Tuskawilla CC Staff Report FINAL Vicinity and Aerial Map SP2021-0005 Site Plan Review Application Chase Bank Final Engineering 2020-0007 Aesthetic Review Aplication WA2021-0022 Waiver Application McDonalds Easement PHASE I ESA Geotech Report Traffic Impact Analysis 3 REA Recorded Purchase and Sale Agreement 20201116 CC Chase Bank DA Recorded Stormwater Narrative Potable Water Demand Review Criteria Response JP Morgan Chase Development Agreement - Chase Bank Final Engineering FINAL REGULAR AGENDA 500. Appointment Opportunities for City Boards and Committees 501. New Business REPORTS 600. City Manager Shawn Boyle 601. City Attorney Anthony A. Garganese 602. City Clerk Christian Gowan 603. Seat Two Commissioner Kevin Cannon 604. Seat Three Commissioner/Deputy Mayor Ted Johnson 605. Seat Four Commissioner TiAnna Hale 606. Seat Five Commissioner Rob Elliott 607. Mayor Kevin McCann 608. Seat One Commissioner Matt Benton PUBLIC INPUT Anyone who wishes to speak during Public Input on any Agenda Item or subject matter will need to fill out a “Public Input” form. Individuals will limit their comments to three (3) minutes, and representatives of groups or homeowners' associations shall limit their comments to five (5) minutes, unless otherwise determined by the City Commission. ADJOURNMENT PUBLIC NOTICE This is a Public Meeting, and the public is invited to attend and this Agenda is subject to change. Please be advised that one (1) or more Members of any of the City's Advisory Boards and Committees may be in 4 attendance at this Meeting, and may participate in discussions. Persons with disabilities needing assistance to participate in any of these proceedings should contact the City of Winter Springs at (407) 327-1800 "at least 48 hours prior to meeting, a written request by a physically handicapped person to attend the meeting, directed to the chairperson or director of such board, commission, agency, or authority" - per Section 286.26 Florida Statutes. "If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the board, agency, or commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he or she will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purpose, he or she may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based" - per Section 286.0105 Florida Statutes. 5 INFORMATIONAL AGENDA ITEM 200 CITY COMMISSION AGENDA | SEPTEMBER 13, 2021 REGULAR MEETING TITLE Current Development Projects Summary SUMMARY Staff is advising the City Commission of the status of current development projects within the City. RECOMMENDATION No action required. 6 Page 1 of 2 CURRENT DEVLEOPMENT PROJECTS SUMMARY PROJECT NAME LOCATION LAST ACTION ITEM CURRENT STATUS AITC Office Building 863 N US 17-92 N/A DA, Final Engineering & Aesthetic Plans are under Staff review. Chase Bank Town Center Community Workshop was held on 02/20/20 CUP and DA approved by the CC on 11/16/20. DA, Final Engineering, Waiver, & Aesthetic Plans were recommended for approval at the 08/05/2021 PZB. DA, Final Engineering, Waiver, & Aesthetic Plans are scheduled for the 09/13/2021 CC. Dream Finders Townhomes (Seminole Crossing): 114 Single-Family (Attached) Units Town Center - East side of Michael Blake Blvd. Preliminary Engineering approved by CC on 1/8/18. DA, Final Engineering, Waivers, & Aesthetic Review approved by the CC on 12/09/2019. Final Plat approved by the CC on 09/28/20. Site work complete. Site acceptance complete on 07/12/2021. Single-Family Homes are under construction. Hickory Grove Townhomes 133 Single-Family (Attached) Units Northeast of Bear Springs Drive and Blumberg Blvd A Non-Binding review was held at the CC on 02/25/2021. Community Workshop was held on 08/26/2021. DA, Final Engineering, Waivers, & Aesthetic Plans are under Staff review. Iriye Suites Live Work Community Town Center SE & DA approved by CC on 01/28/19 Pending* - Final Engineering and Aesthetic Plans Northern Oaks: 35 Single-Family Homes by Dream Finders Homes North side of SR 434, East of SR 417 Final Engineering & Waivers approved 03/13/17. Aesthetic Review approved 04/9/18. Waiver approved by CC on 11/18/19 Site acceptance complete on 01/13/20. Single-Family Homes are under construction. The Studios at Tuscawilla Vistawilla Drive Community Workshop was held on 07/19/19. DA approved by the CC on 01/13/20. Pending* - Final Engineering, Aesthetic, & Waivers 7 Page 2 of 2 Tuskawilla Crossings: 379 Single-Family Homes Town Center DA, Final Engineering, Waivers, & Aesthetics approved by CC on 04/24/17. Plat approved 08/13/18. Site acceptance complete. Single-Family Homes under construction. Winter Springs Medical Office E SR 434 Community Workshop was held on 08/13/19 DA, Final Engineering & Aesthetic Plans approved by the CC on 11/16/20. Aesthetic Plans for Chipotle approved by the CC on 08/09/2021. Site work started. Building under construction. Winter Springs Marketplace Five (5) Building Commercial Shopping Center SW Corner of SR 434 and Tuskawilla Road Community Workshop was held on 05/28/20 DA, Final Engineering, Waivers, & Aesthetic Review approved by the CC on 02/22/2021. Site work started. Buildings under construction. Winter Springs Retirement Residence (The Savoy): 144 independent suites Town Center DA, Final Engineering, Waivers, & Aesthetic Review approved by CC on 01/22/18. Site work complete. Suites under construction. Winter Springs Town Center Retail Building (Ocean Bleu) Town Center Final Engineering & Aesthetic Plans approved by CC on 06/10/19. Pending* - Preconstruction Meeting For more information please click the link below: City of Winter Springs Community Development Projects List/Locations Notes: ADU = Accessory Dwelling Unit CC = City Commission CUP = Conditional Use Permit DA = Development Agreement PZB = Planning and Zoning Board SE = Special Exception *No Current Activity 8 CONSENT AGENDA ITEM 300 CITY COMMISSION AGENDA | SEPTEMBER 13, 2021 REGULAR MEETING TITLE Police Equipment Donation SUMMARY The Winter Springs Police Department was recently able to locate information published by the Pinellas Park (FL) Police Department (PPPD) indicating they were donating several pieces of Taser device-related equipment to any police agency that could use it. As we currently use the Taser X2 platform that is compatible with the proposed donation, staff reached out to PPPD to arrange the acquisition of the equipment. The equipment available is listed as follows: 114 – Taser X2 batteries 116 – Taser X2 holsters 285 – Taser cartridges (mixed use) Staff is requesting the Commission approve acceptance of the proposed donation. The approximate total value of this equipment is $3,000. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Commission approve the acceptance of the donated equipment to the Winter Springs Police Department from the Pinellas Park (FL) Police Department. 9 CONSENT AGENDA ITEM 301 CITY COMMISSION AGENDA | SEPTEMBER 13, 2021 REGULAR MEETING TITLE Resolution 2021-23 recognizing the retirement of CCSA Catherine A. Presley from the Police Department. SUMMARY CCSA (Certified Crime Scene Analyst) Catherine Presley began her career with the City of Winter Springs as a Communications operator on June 24, 1996. During her career, she has held numerous assignments critical to the success of the police department too extensive to list but her assignment as an Evidence Technician in 2005 is where she has excelled. Among her numerous job duties, CCSA Presley has been tasked with the oversight and control of the department's Evidence Section and crime scene laboratory where they have been impeccably maintained and used as a model for other agencies. Most notably, she earned countless hours of advanced specialized training that allowed her to become a Certified Crime Scene Analyst- a first for the police department. As a further example of her commitment, she instructed both in the Police Explorer Academy for years to help mentor young people in our community and in our Citizens Police Academy to demonstrate to the participants how these police department functions serve them. She has been a model ambassador for the WSPD and her contributions will be missed. CCSA Presley served this city with distinction and with honor for over 25 years and retired from service with the City of Winter Springs in August 2021. As is customary for long-tenured employees who have reached retirement from service with the City, the Commission has desired to formally recognize them for their service via presentation of a Resolution designed for this purpose. RECOMMENDATION Staff requests the Commission review and approve Resolution 2021-23 to be presented to CCSA Catherine Presley. 10 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA RECOGNIZING MRS. CATHERINE A. PRESLEY FOR HER 25 YEARS OF DEDICATED SERVICE AS AN EMPLOYEE OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS; AND EXPRESSING OUR APPRECIATION ON BEHALF OF THE CITIZENS OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Whereas, Catherine Presley has provided the residents of the City of Winter Springs with 25 years of exceptional, dedicated and distinguished service since joining the Police Department on June 24, 1996; and Whereas, Catherine Presley has served with the police department with professionalism, pride, dedication, and commitment in numerous vital roles within the agency to include Communications Operator, the Records Section, and most notably as a Technical Services Specialist and Crime Scene Analyst; and Whereas, Catherine Presley has earned hundreds of hours of rigorous advanced and specialized training to earn the credentials as a Certified Crime Scene Analyst through the International Association of Identification- a first in the history of the Police Department. These skills have allowed countless criminal acts committed against our community to be solved and justice brought to those victims; and Whereas, Catherine Presley has managed the Property and Evidence Room for the police department in a way that has served as a model for other agencies and that has garnered accolades and ongoing accreditation for the police department. Now Therefore, Be it Resolved by the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida as follows: Section I – Upon the occasion of Catherine Presley’s retirement, the Mayor and Commission, City Manager, and City Staff, wish to recognize and honor her for her excellent level of distinguished service to the residents of Winter Springs through her 25 years of exemplary service. Section II – That the Resolution commending the services of Catherine Presley be recorded upon the official Public Records and Minutes of the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida Section III – That a copy of the Resolution be forwarded to Catherine Presley with our sincerest and heartfelt thanks and appreciation for her numerous and valued important contributions. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA IN A REGULAR MEETING ASSEMBLED ON SEPTEMBER 13, 2021 In witness whereof I have hereunto by my hand and caused this seal to be affixed. ____________________________ Kevin McCann, Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________ City Clerk 11 CONSENT AGENDA ITEM 302 CITY COMMISSION AGENDA | SEPTEMBER 13, 2021 REGULAR MEETING TITLE Agreement Extension with Eola Technology Partners, LLC. SUMMARY The City signed an agreement with Eola Technology Partners for IT support services and infrastructure management in 2018 for a 3 year period at $180,000 per year with option to renew annually until a maximum of 5 years has been met. The 3 year contract period will expire on September 30, 2021. This will be the first of two possible annual renewals as stipulated in the agreement. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Commission authorize the City Manager to extend the agreement with Eola Technology Partners, LLC for the period of 10/1/21 through 09/30/22 in the amount of $180,0000, for technical support services provided to the City. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FIRST Addendum to Managed Services Agreement City of Winter Springs / Eola Technology Partners, LLC. Page 1 of 2 FIRST ADDENDUM TO MANAGED SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS FIRST ADDENDUM TO MANAGED SERVICES AGREEMENT (“Addendum”) is made and entered into this day of , 2021, by and between the CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA, a Florida Municipal Corporation, located at 1126 E. State Road 434, Winter Springs, Florida 32708 ("City") and EOLA TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, LLC., a Florida Corporation, located at 3670 Maguire Blvd Suite 250, Florida 32803 ("Contractor"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Contractor and City previously entered into that certain Managed Services Agreement, effective December 1, 2018; and WHEREAS, Contractor and City desire to extend the term of the Agreement an additional one (1) year; and WHEREAS, the parties desire to enter this FIRST Addendum to utilize the Agreements first of two annual renewal options to extend agreement and services of three (3) year term more specifically provided herein. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, agreements, and consideration contained herein, the City and Contractor agree as hereinafter set forth: 1.0 Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and accurate and are incorporated herein by this reference. 2.0 Renewal of Term. 2.1 Pursuant to Paragraph 2 of the Agreement, the City and Contractor hereby agree that the Agreement shall be extended for an additional one (1) year term, commencing on October 1, 2021 and terminating on 21 FIRST Addendum to Managed Services Agreement City of Winter Springs / Eola Technology Partners, LLC. Page 2 of 2 September 30, 2022, unless sooner terminated in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement. 3.0 Other Provisions. All other provisions of the Agreement not amended hereunder shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties cause this FIRST Addendum to be executed and attested to by their respective authorized officials. ATTEST: CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA: By: _ Christian Gowan, City Clerk , Mayor Date: CORPORATE SEAL: CONTRACTOR: EOLA TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, LLC. By: Print Name/Title: 22 CONSENT AGENDA ITEM 303 CITY COMMISSION AGENDA | SEPTEMBER 13, 2021 REGULAR MEETING TITLE American Rescue Plan Act Corona Virus Fiscal Recovery Funding "Draft" Agreement with the State of Florida and Resolution 2021-24 Establishing New "ARPA" Special Revenue Fund SUMMARY At the Commission meeting on June 14, 2021 staff presented Informational Agenda Item 201 to introduce the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA); which provides guaranteed direct relief to cities, towns and villages in the United States (H.R.1319 Sec. 9901: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds). The Secretary of the Treasury issued an Interim Final Rule (IFR) to implement the Coronavirus State Fiscal Recovery Fund and the Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Fund established under the American Rescue Plan Act. It was noted The City of Winter Springs is included in the Non-Entitlement Units of Local Government (NEUs) based on our latest census numbers. The Act designates NEUs will receive federal funds through the State. In order for the State of Florida to release these funds, the State must enter into an agreement with each NEU, herein titled the American Rescue Plan Act Corona Virus Local Fiscal Recovery Fund "DRAFT" Agreement (the agreement). The attached agreement is made by and between the City and the State of Florida, Division of Emergency Management (Division). The term of the agreement will be effective upon execution and will end on December 31, 2024. As noted in the information provided to the Commission back in June, the IFR allows for costs incurred through 12/31/2024 with a period of performance that extends through 12/31/2026. The State will release the awarded funds in two equal tranches 12 months apart. Also, included in the IFR it bears noting that the State may not impose stricter limitations than permitted by statute or Treasury regulations or guidance on an NEU’s use of Fiscal Recovery Funds based on the NEU’s proposed spending plan or other policies. States and territories are also not permitted to offset any debt owed by the NEUs against the NEU’s distribution. Further, States and territories may not provide funding on a reimbursement basis—e.g., 23 requiring NEU’s to pay for project costs up front before being reimbursed with Fiscal Recovery Funds payments—because this funding model would not comport with the statutory requirement that States and territories make distributions to NEU’s within the statutory timeframe. Finally, the IFR outlines the following eligible uses for these funds: 1. To respond to the public health emergency or its negative economic impacts, including assistance to households, small businesses, and nonprofits, or aid to impacted industries such as tourism, travel, and hospitality; 2. To respond to workers performing essential work during the COVID-19 public health emergency by providing premium pay to eligible workers; 3. For the provision of government services to the extent of the reduction in revenue due to the COVID–19 public health emergency relative to revenues collected in the most recent full fiscal year prior to the emergency; and 4. To make necessary investments in water, sewer, or broadband Subsequent to staff’s receipt of the agreement, it was determined additional edits are required to the agreement by the Division to meet the Treasury Guidelines. Staff has sent a request to the Division to make certain necessary changes which include but are not limited to the following examples: On page 7 of the Recovery Fund Agreement in paragraph (13) subparagraph m. a conflict exists with Treasury Guidelines. This provision relates to the use of interest a city may earn by investing their allocated funds. The Recovery Fund Agreement restricts interest to be expended only on program allowable expenditures. However, Treasury Guidelines allow interest earned to be expended with no restrictions. The Division’s legal department is aware of this discrepancy and has expressed a willingness to amend the Recovery Fund Agreement for any city that contacts the Division requesting an amendment. On page 7 of the Recovery Fund Agreement in paragraph (13) subparagraph j. the Agreement requires travel expenses to be in compliance with section 112.061, Florida Statutes. However, many city travel expense policies are in compliance with section 166.021(9), Florida Statutes, which specifically exempts cities from the per diem requirements of section 112.061, Florida Statutes. The Division’s legal department is aware of this discrepancy and has expressed a travel expenses policy under section 166.021(9), Florida Statutes, is permissible. 24 Staff also requests the Commission approve Resolution 2021-24 for the establishment of the ARPA Fund a new Special Revenue fund, to formally restrict expenditures to the specific purpose as outlined in the IFR (noted in items 1-4 above) and ensure proper accounting and compliance with federal reporting guidelines. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Commission give the City Manager and City Attorney authority to negotiate, modify, and execute the American Rescue Plan Act Corona Virus Local Fiscal Recovery Fund Agreement using the State’s electronic delivery and signature system called Conga Sign once certain necessary changes have been made. In addition, staff requests the Commission approve Resolution 2021-24 for the establishment of the ARPA Fund, a new Special Revenue fund which will formally restrict expenditures and comply with the eligible uses identified in the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA) under H.R.1319 Sec. 9901: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds. 25 City of Winter Springs, Florida Resolution 2021‐24 Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-24 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA, FORMALLY ACKNOWLEDGING AND ESTABLISHING, PURSUANT TO GASB 54, THE A R P A FUND AS A SPECIAL REVENUE FUND FOR THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF PRIOR INCONSISTENT RESOLUTIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Commission of Winter Springs desires to comply with the Government Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 54 Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions ; and WHEREAS, the City Commission desires to establish the ARPA fund; a special revenue fund, which will formally restrict expenditures and comply with the eligible uses identified in the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA) under H.R.1319 Sec. 9901: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (“Act”); and WHEREAS , the City Commission of Winter Springs deems that this Resolution is in the best interest of the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Winter Springs. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS HEREBY RESOLVES, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are hereby fully incorporated herein by this reference as legislative findings and the intent and purpose of the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs Section 2. Establishment of the ARPA Fund. The Winter Springs City Commission hereby formally acknowledges and establishes the ARPA Fund as a Special Revenue Fund which will formally restrict expenditures to the specific purpose set forth in the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021. The ARPA fund will have the following eligible uses identified in the statute: a) To respond to the public health emergency or its negative economic impacts, including assistance to households, small businesses, and nonprofits, or aid to impacted industries such as tourism, travel, and hospitality; b) To respond to workers performing essential work during the COVID-19 public health emergency by providing premium pay to eligible workers; c) For the provision of government services to the extent of the reduction in revenue due to the COVID–19 public health emergency relative to revenues collected in the most recent full fiscal year prior to the emergency; and d) To make necessary investments in water, sewer, or broadband infrastructure. To extent that any provision of this Resolution conflicts with the Act, the conflicting provisions of the Act shall prevail, and the City shall comply with the Act. 26 City of Winter Springs, Florida Resolution 2021‐24 Page 1 of 2 Section 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, word, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, whether for substantive or procedural reasons, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Resolution. Section 4. Repeal of Prior Inconsistent Resolutions. All prior resolutions or parts of resolutions in conflict herewith are hereby repealed to the extent of the conflict. Section 5. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption by the City Commission. RESOLVED by the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, in a regular meeting assembled on the 13th day of September 2021. ___________________________________ Kevin McCann, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________________________ Christian Gowan, City Clerk Approved as to legal form and sufficiency for the City of Winter Springs only: _______________________________________ Anthony A. Garganese, City Attorney 27 Draft1 Agreement Number: Y5325 Unique Identifier Code: FL0331 AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT CORONAVIRUS LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUND AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into by and between the State of Florida, Division of Emergency Management (the “Division”) and Winter Springs, City of (the “Non-Entitlement Unit” or “Recipient”). RECITALS A. Section 9901 of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (Pub. L. No. 117-2, §9901) added section 603(a) to the Social Security Act (“ARPA”), which created the Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Fund for the purpose of providing funds to local governments in order to facilitate the ongoing recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic (“Fiscal Recovery Funds”); and B. Following the enactment of ARPA, the U.S. Department of the Treasury (“Treasury” or “Secretary”) released formal and informal guidance regarding implementation of ARPA, including the disbursement and expenditure of Fiscal Recovery Funds, including Treasury Interim Final Rule, 31 CFR pt. 35, 2021, attending rule guidance published in the Federal Register, Volume 86, No 93,1, and informal guidance made publicly available by Treasury, which may be amended, superseded, or replaced during the term of this Agreement (“Treasury Guidance”); and C. ARPA allocated $7,105,927,713.00 for making payments to metropolitan cities, non-entitlement units of local government, and counties in Florida, 21% of which is to be paid directly to metropolitan cities in Florida, 59% of which was paid directly to counties in Florida, and 20% of which is to be paid to the State of Florida for distribution to non-entitlement units of local government; and D. The Secretary disbursed $5,689,502,590.00 of these funds directly to metropolitan cities and counties; and E. A remaining balance of $1,416,425,123.00 was reserved for the State of Florida to disburse to non-entitlement units of local government; and F. The Division has received these funds from the Secretary through the State of Florida in accordance with the provisions of ARPA; and G. Pursuant to the provisions of ARPA, the Division is the state entity responsible for disbursing the funds to the Recipient under this Agreement; and H. The Recipient is fully qualified and eligible to receive this funding in accordance with ARPA for the purposes identified therein. Therefore, in consideration of the mutual promises, terms and conditions contained herein, the Division and the Recipient agree as follows: (1) RECITALS. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference. (2) TERM. This Agreement shall be effective upon execution and shall end on December 31, 2024, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. Upon expiration or termination of this Agreement for any reason, the obligations which by their nature are intended to survive expiration or termination of this Agreement will survive. (3) FUNDING. The State of Florida, through the Division, will make a disbursement of each non-entitlement unit of local government’s allocation based on the list of non-entitlement units published by Treasury and based upon the State’s calculation of the Recipient’s proportional share of the total population of all non-entitlement units in the State. The total Fiscal Recovery Funds allocation for Recipient under this Agreement is $18,687,851.00. (4) USE OF FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS a. The State, through the Division, will—within 30 days of receiving payment from the Secretary, or within such other time period as may be permitted by the Secretary—make an initial disbursement to the non-entitlement 1 https://www.regulations.gov/document/TREAS-DO-2021-0008-0002 | Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 93, Pg. 26786 (“Federal Register”) 28 Draft2 unit of local government of 50% of the total amount allocated to the non-entitlement unit.2 Not earlier than 12 months from the date upon which the State makes the initial disbursement, the Secretary is expected to release the Second Tranche amount to the State. The State will—within 30 days of receiving payment from the Secretary, or within such other time period as may be permitted by the Secretary—make a second disbursement to the non-entitlement unit of local government. b. Recipients may use payments for any expenses eligible under ARPA Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds. Payments are not required to be used as the source of funding of last resort. c. ARPA requires that Fiscal Recovery Funds may only be used to cover expenses incurred by the non- entitlement unit of local government by December 31, 20243, such as: i. to respond to the public health emergency with respect to COVID-19 or its negative economic impacts, including assistance to households, small businesses, and nonprofits, or aid to impacted industries such as tourism, travel, and hospitality; ii. to respond to workers performing essential work during the COVID-19 public health emergency by providing premium pay to eligible workers of the non-entitlement unit of local government that are performing such essential work, or by providing grants to eligible employers that have eligible workers who perform essential work; iii. for the provision of government services to the extent of the reduction in revenue of such non- entitlement unit of local government due to the COVID-19 public health emergency relative to revenues collected in the most recent full fiscal year of the non-entitlement unit of local government; or iv. to make necessary investments in water, sewer, or broadband infrastructure. d. As specified in the Treasury Guidance, Eligible Use of Fiscal Recovery Funds falls under four categories, including (1) Public Health and Economic Impacts, (2) Premium Pay for Essential Workers, (3) Revenue Loss, and (4) Investments in Infrastructure. i. Public Health and Economic Impacts: Examples of eligible uses of Fiscal Recovery Funds under this category include, but are not limited to: 1. COVID-19 Mitigation and Prevention expenses, such as vaccination programs, medical care, testing, personal protective equipment (PPE), and ventilation improvements;4 2. Medical expenses, including both current expenses and future medical services for individuals experiencing prolonged symptoms and health complications from COVID-19;5 3. Payroll expenses for public safety, public health, health care, human services, and other similar employees, to the extent that their services are devoted to mitigating or responding to COVID-19;6 4. Efforts to remedy the economic impact of the COVID-19 public health emergency on households, individuals, businesses, and state, local, and tribal governments;7 and 5. Efforts to remedy pre-existing economic disparities which were exacerbated by the COVID- 19 public health emergency.8 ii. Premium Pay: Fiscal Recovery Funds may also be used to provide premium pay to essential workers, per Treasury Guidance’s definition of “essential work.”9 Examples of essential workers include, but are not limited to: 1. Staff at nursing homes, hospitals, and home care settings; 2. Workers at farms, food production facilities, grocery stores, and restaurants; 3. Janitors, truck drivers, transit staff, and warehouse workers 4. Public health and safety staff; 5. Childcare workers, educators, and other school staff; and 2 “First Tranche Amount,” American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, H.R. s. 601(b)(7) “Timing” 3 https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/136/Coronavirus-Relief-Fund-Guidance-for-State-Territorial-Local-and-Tribal- Governments.pdf 4 See Federal Register, pg. 26790. 5 Id. 6 Id. at. 26791 7 Id at 26791-26797 8 Id. 9 Id. at 26797 29 Draft3 6. Social service and human services staff.10 iii. Revenue Loss: Recipients may use Fiscal Recovery Funds for the provision of government services to the extent of the reduction in revenue experienced due to the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency.11 iv. Investments in Infrastructure: Treasury Guidance specifies that Fiscal Recovery Funds may be used to improve access to clean drinking water, improve wastewater and stormwater infrastructure systems, and provide access to high-quality broadband services.12 e. Additional guidance regarding eligible uses of Fiscal Recovery Funds, as well as impermissible uses (including for pensions or to offset revenue losses from tax reductions) is set forth in Treasury Guidance. (5) LAWS, RULES, REGULATIONS, AND POLICIES a. Performance under this Agreement is subject to the applicable provisions of 2 CFR Part 200, entitled “Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards” including the cost principles and restrictions on general provisions for selected items of cost. i. The following 2 CFR policy requirements apply to this assistance listing13: • Subpart B, General provisions; • Subpart C, Pre-Federal Award Requirements and Contents of Federal Awards; • Subpart D, Post Federal; Award Requirements; • Subpart E, Cost Principles; and • Subpart F, Audit Requirements. ii. The following 2 CFR policy requirements also apply to this assistance listing: 2 C.F.R. Part 25, Universal Identifier and System for Award Management; 2 C.F.R. Part 170, Reporting Subaward and Executive Compensation Information; and 2 C.F.R. Part 180, OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Non- procurement). The following 2 CFR Policy requirements are excluded from coverage under this assistance listing: For 2 C.F.R. Part 200, Subpart C; 2 C.F.R. § 200.204 (Notices of Funding Opportunities); 2 C.F.R. § 200.205 (Federal awarding agency review of merit of proposal); 2 C.F.R. § 200.210 (Pre-award costs);and 2 C.F.R. § 200.213 (Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award). For 2 C.F.R. Part 200, Subpart D, the following provisions do not apply to the SLFRF program: 2 C.F.R. § 200.308 (revision of budget or program plan); 2 C.F.R. § 200.309 (modifications to period of performance); C.F.R. § 200.305 (b)(8) and (9) (Federal Payment). b. In addition to the foregoing, the Recipient and the Division will be governed by all applicable State and Federal laws, rules and regulations, including those identified in Attachment C. Any express reference in this Agreement to a particular statute, rule, or regulation in no way implies that no other statute, rule, or regulation applies. (6) NOTICES a. All notices under this Agreement shall be made in writing to the individuals designated in this paragraph. In the event that different representatives or addresses are designated by either party after execution of this Agreement, notice of the new name, title and contact information of the new representative will be promptly provided to the other party, and no modification to this Agreement is required. b. In accordance with section 215.971(2), Florida Statutes, the Division’s Program Manager will be responsible for enforcing performance of this Agreement’s terms and conditions and will serve as the Division’s liaison 10 Id. 11 Id. at 26799 12 Id. at 26802 13 As defined in 2 C.F.R. § 200.1 30 Draft4 with the Recipient. As part of his/her duties, the Program Manager for the Division will monitor and document Recipient performance. c. The Division’s Program Manager for this Agreement is: Erin White Division of Emergency Management 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 Telephone: 850-815-4458 Email: Erin.White@em.myflorida.com d. The name and address of the representative responsible for the administration of this Agreement is: Melissa Shirah Division of Emergency Management 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 Telephone: 850-815-4455 Email: Melissa.Shirah@em.myflorida.com e. The contact information of the representative of the Recipient is: Authorized Representative: Title: Address: Telephone: Email: (7) PAYMENT a. In order to obtain funding under this Agreement, the Recipient must file with the Division Program Manager information and documentation, including but not limited to the following: i. Local government name, Entity’s Taxpayer Identification Number, DUNS number, and address; ii. Authorized representative name, title, and email; iii. Contact person name, title, phone, and email; iv. Financial institution information (e.g., routing and account number, financial institution name and contact information); v. Total NEU budget (defined as the annual total operating budget, including general fund and other funds, in effect as of January 27, 2020) or top-line expenditure total (in exceptional cases in which the NEU does not adopt a formal budget); vi. Signed Assurances of Compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. (Attachment D); and vii. Signed Award Terms and Conditions Agreement (Attachment E). b. Payment requests must include a certification, signed by an official who is authorized to legally bind the Recipient, which reads as follows: By signing this report, I certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that the report is true, complete, and accurate, and the expenditures, disbursements and cash receipts are for the purposes and objectives set forth in the terms and conditions of the Federal award. I am aware that any false, fictitious, or fraudulent information, or the omission of any material fact, may subject me to criminal, civil or administrative penalties for fraud, false statements, false claims or otherwise. (U.S. Code Title 18, Section 1001 and Title 31, Sections 3729–3730 and 3801–3812). 31 Draft5 (8) RECORDS a. As a condition of receiving state or federal financial assistance, and as required by sections 20.055(6)(c) and 215.97(5)(b), Florida Statutes, the Division, the Chief Inspector General of the State of Florida, the Florida Auditor General, or any of their authorized representatives, shall enjoy the right of access to any documents, financial statements, papers, or other records of the Recipient which are pertinent to this Agreement, in order to make audits, examinations, excerpts, and transcripts. The right of access also includes timely and reasonable access to the Recipient’s personnel for the purpose of interview and discussion related to such documents. For the purposes of this section, the term “Recipient” includes employees or agents, including all subcontractors or consultants to be paid from funds provided under this Agreement. b. The Recipient shall maintain all records related to this Agreement for the period of time specified in the appropriate retention schedule published by the Florida Department of State. Information regarding retention schedules can be obtained at: http://dos.myflorida.com/library-archives/records-management/general- records-schedules/. c. Florida's Government in the Sunshine Law (section 286.011, Florida Statutes) provides the citizens of Florida with a right of access to governmental proceedings and mandates three, basic requirements: (1) all meetings of public boards or commissions must be open to the public; (2) reasonable notice of such meetings must be given; and (3) minutes of the meetings must be taken and promptly recorded. d. Florida's Public Records Law provides a right of access to the records of the state and local governments as well as to private entities acting on their behalf. Unless specifically exempted from disclosure by Florida Statute, all materials made or received by a governmental agency (or a private entity acting on behalf of such an agency) in conjunction with official business which are used to perpetuate, communicate, or formalize knowledge qualify as public records subject to public inspection. IF THE RECIPIENT HAS QUESTIONS REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF CHAPTER 119, FLORIDA STATUTES, TO THE RECIPIENT’S DUTY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC RECORDS RELATING TO THIS CONTRACT, CONTACT THE CUSTODIAN OF PUBLIC RECORDS AT: (850) 815-4156, Records@em.myflorida.com, or 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard, Tallahassee, FL 32399. (9) AUDITS a. In accounting for the receipt and expenditure of funds under this Agreement, the Recipient must follow Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”). As defined by 2 CFR §200.49, “GAAP has the meaning specified in accounting standards issued by the Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB) and the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). b. When conducting an audit of the Recipient’s performance under this Agreement, the Division must use Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards (“GAGAS”). As defined by 2 CFR §200.50, “GAGAS, also known as the Yellow Book, means generally accepted government auditing standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, which are applicable to financial audits. c. If an audit shows that all or any portion of the funds disbursed were not spent in accordance with the conditions of and strict compliance with this Agreement and with Section 603(c) of the Social Security Act, the Recipient will be held liable for reimbursement to the Secretary of all funds used in violation of these applicable regulations and Agreement provisions within thirty (30) days after the Division has notified the Recipient of such non-compliance. d. The Recipient must have all audits completed by an independent auditor, which is defined in section 215.97(2)(i), Florida Statutes, as “an independent certified public accountant licensed under chapter 473.” The independent auditor must state that the audit complied with the applicable provisions noted above. The audits must be received by the Division no later than nine months from the end of the Recipient’s fiscal year. e. The Recipient must send copies of reporting packages required under this paragraph directly to each of the following: i. The Division of Emergency Management DEMSingle_Audit@em.myflorida.com 32 Draft6 OR Office of the Inspector General 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 ii. The Auditor General Room 401, Claude Pepper Building 111 West Madison Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1450 f. Fund payments are considered to be federal financial assistance subject to the Single Audit Act and the related provisions of the Uniform Guidance. (10) REPORTS a. The Recipient must provide the Secretary with periodic reports providing a detailed accounting of the uses of such funds by such non-entitlement unit of local government including such other information as the Secretary may require for administration of the Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Fund. Concurrently, Recipients must provide to the Division a copy of the report given to the Secretary. b. Failure by Recipient to submit all required reports and copies may result in the Division’s withholding of further payments until all such documents are submitted to the Division and deemed to be satisfactory. c. The Recipient must provide additional program updates or information if requested by the Division. (11) LIABILITY. Any Recipient which is a state agency or subdivision, as defined in section 768.28, Florida Statutes, agrees to be fully responsible for its negligent or tortious acts or omissions which result in claims or suits against the Division, and agrees to be liable for any damages proximately caused by the acts or omissions to the extent set forth in section 768.28, Florida Statutes. Nothing herein is intended to serve as a waiver of sovereign immunity by any party to which sovereign immunity applies. Nothing herein will be construed as consent by a state agency or subdivision of the State of Florida to be sued by third parties in any matter arising out of this Agreement. (12) TERMINATION a. The Division may terminate this Agreement immediately for cause upon written notice to Recipient. Cause includes, but is not limited to, misuse of funds, fraud, non-compliance with ARPA, Treasury Guidance, or other applicable rules, laws and regulations, or failure by the Recipient to afford timely public access to any document, paper, letter, or other material subject to disclosure under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. b. The Division may terminate this Agreement for convenience upon thirty (30) days’ prior written notice to Recipient. c. In the event this Agreement is terminated, the Recipient must not incur new obligations for the terminated portion of this Agreement after it has received the notification of termination. The Recipient must cancel as many outstanding obligations as possible. Obligations incurred after receipt of the termination notice will be disallowed. The Recipient will not be relieved of liability to the Division because of any breach of this Agreement by the Recipient. The Division may, if and to the extent permitted by ARPA and Treasury Guidance, withhold payments to the Recipient for the purpose of set-off until the exact amount due the Division from the Recipient is determined and resolved. (13) MISCELLANEOUS a. The validity of this Agreement is subject to the truth and accuracy of all the information, representations, and materials submitted or provided by the Recipient in this Agreement, in any later submission or response to a Division request, or in any submission or response to fulfill the requirements of this Agreement. All of said information, representations, and materials is incorporated by reference. The inaccuracy of the submissions 33 Draft7 or any material changes will, at the option of the Division and with thirty (30) days written notice to the Recipient, cause the termination of this Agreement and the release of the Division from all its obligations to the Recipient. b. This Agreement must be construed under the laws of the State of Florida, and venue for any actions arising out of this Agreement will be in the Circuit Court of Leon County. If any provision of this Agreement is in conflict with any applicable statute or rule, or is unenforceable, then the provision is null and void to the extent of the conflict, and is severable, but does not invalidate any other provision of this Agreement. c. Any power of approval or disapproval granted to the Division under the terms of this Agreement will survive the term of this Agreement. d. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, any one of which may be taken as an original. e. The Recipient agrees to comply with the Americans With Disabilities Act (Public Law 101-336, 42 U.S.C. Section 12101 et seq.), which prohibits discrimination by public and private entities on the basis of disability in employment, public accommodations, transportation, State and local government services, and telecommunications. f. The Recipient must comply with any Statement of Assurances incorporated as Attachment D. g. Those who have been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime or on the discriminatory vendor list may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity, may not submit a bid on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not submit bids on leases of real property to a public entity, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with a public entity, and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of $25,000.00 for a period of thirty-six (36) months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list or on the discriminatory vendor list. h. The State of Florida's performance and obligation to pay under this Agreement is contingent upon an annual appropriation by the Legislature, and subject to any modification in accordance with Chapter 216, Florida Statutes, or the Florida Constitution. i. All bills for fees or other compensation for services or expenses shall be submitted in detail sufficient for a proper pre-audit and post-audit thereof. j. Any bills for travel expenses must be submitted in accordance with section 112.061, Florida Statutes. k. This Agreement, upon execution, contains the entire agreement of the parties and no prior written or oral agreement, express or implied, shall be admissible to contradict the provisions of this Agreement. l. This Agreement may not be modified except by formal written amendment executed by both of the parties. m. If the Recipient is allowed to temporarily invest any advances of funds under this Agreement, they must use the interest earned or other proceeds of these investments only to cover expenditures incurred in accordance with section 603 of the Social Security Act and the Guidance on eligible expenses. If a government deposits Fiscal Recovery Fund payments in a government’s general account, it may use those funds to meet immediate cash management needs provided that the full amount of the payment is used to cover necessary expenditures. Fund payments are not subject to the Cash Management Improvement Act of 1990, as amended. The State of Florida will not intentionally award publicly-funded contracts to any contractor who knowingly employs unauthorized alien workers, constituting a violation of the employment provisions contained in 8 U.S.C. Section 1324a(e) [Section 274A(e) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”)]. The Division shall consider the employment by any contractor of unauthorized aliens a violation of Section 274A(e) of the INA. Such violation by the Recipient of the employment provisions contained in Section 274A(e) of the INA will be grounds for unilateral cancellation of this Agreement by the Division. n. The Recipient is subject to Florida’s Government in the Sunshine Law (section 286.011, Florida Statutes) with respect to the meetings of the Recipient’s governing board or the meetings of any subcommittee making recommendations to the governing board. All of these meetings must be publicly noticed, open to the public, and the minutes of all the meetings will be public records, available to the public in accordance with Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. o. All expenditures of state or federal financial assistance must be in compliance with the laws, rules and regulations applicable to expenditures of State funds, including but not limited to, the Reference Guide for State Expenditures. p. In accordance with section 215.971(1)(d), Florida Statutes, the Recipient may expend funds authorized by this Agreement only for allowable costs resulting from obligations incurred during the specific agreement period. 34 Draft8 q. Any balances of unobligated cash that have been advanced or paid that are not authorized to be retained for direct program costs in a subsequent period must be refunded to the Secretary. r. If the purchase of the asset was consistent with the limitations on the eligible use of Fiscal Recovery Funds provided by ARPA and Treasury Guidance, the Recipient may retain the asset. If such assets are disposed of prior to December 31, 2024, the proceeds would be subject to the restrictions on the eligible use of Fiscal Recovery Funds provided by ARPA. (14) LOBBYING PROHIBITION a. 2 CFR §200.450 prohibits reimbursement for costs associated with certain lobbying activities. b. Section 216.347, Florida Statutes, prohibits “any disbursement of grants and aids appropriations pursuant to a contract or grant to any person or organization unless the terms of the grant or contract prohibit the expenditure of funds for the purpose of lobbying the Legislature, the judicial branch, or a state agency.” c. No funds or other resources received from the Division under this Agreement may be used directly or indirectly to influence legislation or any other official action by the Florida Legislature or any state agency. d. The Recipient certifies the following: i. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the Recipient, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan or cooperative agreement. ii. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan or cooperative agreement, the Recipient must complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, “Disclosure of Lobbying Activities.” iii. The Recipient must require that this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all Recipients shall certify and disclose. iv. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. (15) REQUIRED CONTRACTUAL PROVISIONS a. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT i. In accordance with 41 CFR §60-1.4(b), the Recipient hereby agrees that it will incorporate or cause to be incorporated into any contract for construction work, or modification thereof, as defined in the regulations of the Secretary of Labor at 41 CFR Chapter 60, which is paid for in whole or in part with funds obtained from the Federal Government or borrowed on the credit of the Federal Government pursuant to a grant, contract, loan, insurance, or guarantee, or undertaken pursuant to any Federal program involving such grant, contract, loan, insurance, or guarantee, the following equal opportunity clause: During the performance of this contract, the contractor agrees as follows: 1. The contractor will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. The contractor will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following: 35 Draft9 a. Employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The contractor agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. 2. The contractor will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the contractor, state that all qualified applicants will receive considerations for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. 3. The contractor will not discharge or in any other manner discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because such employee or applicant has inquired about, discussed, or disclosed the compensation of the employee or applicant or another employee or applicant. This provision shall not apply to instances in which an employee who has access to the compensation information of other employees or applicants as a part of such employee’s essential job functions discloses the compensation of such other employees or applicants to individuals who do not otherwise have access to such information, unless such disclosure is in response to a formal complaint or charge, in furtherance of an investigation, proceeding, hearing, or action, including an investigation conducted by the employer, or is consistent with the contractor’s legal duty to furnish information. 4. The contractor will send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided advising the said labor union or workers’ representatives of the contractor’s commitments under this section, and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment. 5. The contractor will comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor. 6. The contractor will furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his books, records, and accounts by the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders. 7. In the event of the contractor’s noncompliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this Agreement or with any of the said rules, regulations, or orders, this Agreement may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the contractor may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts or federally assisted construction contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulation, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law. 8. The contractor will include the portion of the sentence immediately preceding paragraph 1(a)(ii) of this section and the provisions of subparagraphs (1) through (8) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontractor or vendor. The contractor will take such action with respect to any subcontract or purchase order as the administering agency may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for noncompliance. Provided, however, that in the event a contractor becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a subcontractor or vendor as a result of such direction by the administering agency, the contractor may request the United States to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States. b. COPELAND ANTI-KICKBACK ACT i. The Recipient hereby agrees that, unless exempt under Federal law, it will incorporate or cause to be incorporated into any contract for construction work, or modification thereof, the following clause: 36 Draft10 “Contractor. The contractor shall comply with 18 U.S.C. § 874, 40 U.S.C. § 3145, and the requirements of 29 CFR pt. 3 as may be applicable, which are incorporated by reference into this contract.” ii. Subcontracts. The contractor or subcontractor shall insert in any subcontracts the clause in subsection b(i) above and such other clauses as the Secretary may by appropriate instructions require, and also a clause requiring the subcontractors to include these clauses in any lower tier subcontracts. The prime contractor shall be responsible for the compliance by any subcontractor or lower tier subcontractor with all of these contract clauses. iii. Breach. A breach of the contract clauses above may be grounds for termination of the contract, and for debarment as a contractor and subcontractor as provided in 29 CFR § 5.12. c. CONTRACT WORK HOURS AND SAFETY STANDARDS If the Recipient, with the funds authorized by this Agreement, enters into a contract that exceeds $100,000 and involves the employment of mechanics or laborers, then any such contract must include a provision for compliance with 40 U.S.C. 3702 and 3704, as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5). Under 40 U.S.C. 3702 of the Act, each contractor must be required to compute the wages of every mechanic and laborer on the basis of a standard work week of 40 hours. Work in excess of the standard work week is permissible provided that the worker is compensated at a rate of not less than one and a half times the basic rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of 40 hours in the work week. The requirements of 40 U.S.C. 3704 are applicable to construction work and provide that no laborer or mechanic must be required to work in surroundings or under working conditions which are unsanitary, hazardous, or dangerous. These requirements do not apply to the purchases of supplies or materials or articles ordinarily available on the open market, or contracts for transportation. d. CLEAN AIR ACT AND THE FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ACT If the Recipient, with the funds authorized by this Agreement, enters into a contract that exceeds $150,000, then any such contract must include the following provision: “Contractor agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251- 1387), and will report violations to FEMA and the Regional Office of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).” e. SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT If the Recipient, with the funds authorized by this Agreement, enters into a contract, then any such contract must include the following provisions: i. This contract is a covered transaction for purposes of 2 CFR pt. 180 and 2 CFR pt. 3000. As such the contractor is required to verify that neither the contractor, its principals (defined at 2 CFR § 180.995), nor its affiliates (defined at 2 CFR § 180.905) are excluded (defined at 2 CFR § 180.940) or disqualified (defined at 2 CFR § 180.935). ii. The contractor must comply with 2 CFR pt. 180, subpart C and 2 CFR pt. 3000, subpart C and must include a requirement to comply with these regulations in any lower tier covered transaction into which it enters. iii. This certification is a material representation of fact relied upon by the Division. If it is later determined that the contractor did not comply with 2 CFR pt. 180, subpart C and 2 CFR pt. 3000, subpart C, in addition to remedies available to the Division, the Federal Government may pursue available remedies, including, but not limited to, suspension and/or debarment. iv. The bidder or proposer agrees to comply with the requirements of 2 CFR pt. 180, subpart C and 2 CFR pt. 3000, subpart C while this offer is valid and throughout the period of any contract that may arise from this offer. The bidder or proposer further agrees to include a provision requiring such compliance in its lower tier covered transactions. 37 Draft11 f. BYRD ANTI-LOBBYING AMENDMENT If the Recipient enters into a contract using funds authorized by this Agreement, then any such contract must include the following clause: “Byrd Anti-Lobbying Amendment, 31 USC § 1352 (as amended). Contractors who apply or bid for an award of $100,000 or more shall file the required certification. Each tier certifies to the tier above that it will not and has not used Federal appropriated funds to pay any person or organization for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a member of Congress, officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with obtaining any Federal contract, grant, or any other award covered by 31 U.S.C. § 1352. Each tier shall also disclose any lobbying with non-Federal funds that takes place in connection with obtaining any Federal award. Such disclosures are forwarded from tier to tier up to the Recipient.” (16) ATTACHMENTS. The parties agree to, and incorporate as though set forth fully herein, the following exhibits and attachments: Exhibit 1 Funding Sources Attachment A ARPA Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Fund Eligibility Certification Attachment B Certification Regarding Lobbying Attachment C Program Statutes and Regulations Attachment D Statement of Assurances Attachment E Award Terms and Conditions (17) LEGAL AUTHORIZATION. The Recipient certifies that its governing body has authorized the Recipient’s execution of this Agreement and that the undersigned person has the authority to legally execute and bind the Recipient to the terms of this Agreement. RECIPIENT Winter Springs, City of By: Name and title: Date: FEIN : 591026364 DUNS : 025212655 STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT By: ______________________________________ Name and Title: Kevin Guthrie, Director Date: ____________________________________ 38 Draft12 Exhibit 1 Funding Sources STATE RESOURCES AWARDED TO THE RECIPIENT PURSUANT TO THIS AGREEMENT, SUBJECT TO SECTION 215.97, FLORIDA STATUTES, CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING: State Project - State awarding agency: Florida Division of Emergency Management Catalog of State Financial Assistance title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSFRF) Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance number: 21.027 Amount of State Funding: $18,687,851.00 39 Draft13 Attachment A ARPA Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Fund Eligibility Certification I, , am the Authorized Agent of Winter Springs, City of (“Recipient”) and I certify that: 1. I have the authority on behalf of the Recipient to request fund payments from the State of Florida (“State”) for federal funds appropriated pursuant to section 603 of the Social Security Act, as added by section 9901 of the American Rescue Plan Act, Pub. L. No. 117-2, Title VI (March 11, 2021). 2. I have submitted to the State the Recipient’s Total Budget in effect as of January 27, 2020, as defined by the United States Department of the Treasury, the annual operating budget including general fund and other funds. 3. I understand that the State will rely on this certification as a material representation in making grant payments to the Recipient. 4. I acknowledge that the Recipient should keep records sufficient to demonstrate that the expenditure of funds it has received is in accordance with section 603(a) of the Social Security Act. 5. I acknowledge that all records and expenditures are subject to audit by the United States Department of Treasury’s Inspector General, the Florida Division of Emergency Management, and the Florida State Auditor General, or designee. 6. I acknowledge that the Recipient has an affirmative obligation to identify and report any duplication of benefits. I understand that the State has an obligation and the authority to de-obligate or offset any duplicated benefits. 7. I acknowledge and agree that the Recipient shall be liable for any costs disallowed pursuant to financial or compliance audits of funds received. 8.I acknowledge that if the Recipient has not obligated the funds it has received to cover costs that were incurred by December 31, 2024, as required by the statute, those funds must be returned to the United States Department of the Treasury. 9. I acknowledge that the Recipient’s proposed uses of the funds provided as grant payments from the State by federal appropriation under section 603 of the Social Security Act will be used only to cover those costs that: a. to respond to the public health emergency with respect to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID–19) or its negative economic impacts, including assistance to households, small businesses, and nonprofits, or aid to impacted industries such as tourism, travel, and hospitality; b. to respond to workers performing essential work during the COVID–19 public health emergency by providing premium pay to eligible workers of the metropolitan city, non-entitlement unit of local government, or county that are performing such essential work, or by providing grants to eligible employers that have eligible workers who perform essential work; c. for the provision of government services to the extent of the reduction in revenue of such metropolitan city, non-entitlement unit of local government, or county due to the COVID–19 public health emergency relative to revenues collected in the most recent full fiscal year of the metropolitan city, non-entitlement unit of local government, or county prior to the emergency; or d. to make necessary investments in water, sewer, or broadband infrastructure. In addition to each of the statements above, I acknowledge on submission of this certification that my jurisdiction has incurred eligible expenses during the period that begins on March 3, 2021 and ends on December 31, 2024. 40 Draft14 By: Signature: Title: Date: 41 Draft15 Attachment B Certification Regarding Lobbying Certification for Contracts, Grants, Loans, and Cooperative Agreements The undersigned Recipient, , certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge that: 1. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of an agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. 2. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence any officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form – LLL, “Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,” in accordance with its instructions. 3. The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all Recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by 31 U.S.C. Sec. 1352 (as amended by the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 119). Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. The Recipient, , certifies or affirms the truthfulness and accuracy of each statement of its certification and disclosure, if any. In addition, Recipient understands and agrees that the provisions of 31 U.S.C. Sec. 3801 et seq. apply to his certification and disclosure, if any. By: Signature: Title:_ Date:_ 42 Draft16 Attachment C Program Statutes and Regulations 42 U.S.C. 801 Social Security Act Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Title 31, Part 35, Code of Federal Treasury Interim Final Rule Regulations Section 215.422, Florida Statutes Payments, warrants, and invoices; processing time limits; dispute limitation; agency or judicial branch compliance Section 215.971, Florida Statutes Agreements funded with federal and state assistance Section 216.347, Florida Statutes Disbursement of grant and aids appropriations for lobbying prohibited CFO MEMORANDUM NO. 04 (2005-06)Compliance Requirements for Agreements 43 Draft17 OMB Approved No. 1505-0271 Expiration Date: November 30, 2021 ASSURANCES OF COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RIGHTS REQUIREMENTS ASSURANCES OF COMPLIANCE WITH TITLE VI OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 As a condition of receipt of federal financial assistance from the Department of the Treasury, the recipient named below (hereinafter referred to as the “Recipient”) provides the assurances stated herein. The federal financial assistance may include federal grants, loans and contracts to provide assistance to the Recipient’s beneficiaries, the use or rent of Federal land or property at below market value, Federal training, a loan of Federal personnel, subsidies, and other arrangements with the intention of providing assistance. Federal financial assistance does not encompass contracts of guarantee or insurance, regulated programs, licenses, procurement contracts by the Federal government at market value, or programs that provide direct benefits. The assurances apply to all federal financial assistance from or funds made available through the Department of the Treasury, including any assistance that the Recipient may request in the future. The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 provides that the provisions of the assurances apply to all of the operations of the Recipient’s program(s) and activity(ies), so long as any portion of the Recipient’s program(s) or activity(ies) is federally assisted in the manner prescribed above. 1. Recipient ensures its current and future compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, which prohibits exclusion from participation, denial of the benefits of, or subjection to discrimination under programs and activities receiving federal financial assistance, of any person in the United States on the ground of race, color, or national origin (42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq.), as implemented by the Department of the Treasury Title VI regulations at 31 CFR Part 22 and other pertinent executive orders such as Executive Order 13166, directives, circulars, policies, memoranda, and/or guidance documents. 2. Recipient acknowledges that Executive Order 13166, “Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency,” seeks to improve access to federally assisted programs and activities for individuals who, because of national origin, have Limited English proficiency (LEP). Recipient understands that denying a person access to its programs, services, and activities because of LEP is a form of national origin discrimination prohibited under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Department of the Treasury’s implementing regulations. Accordingly, Recipient shall initiate reasonable steps, or comply with the Department of the Treasury’s directives, to ensure that LEP persons have meaningful access to its programs, services, and activities. Recipient understands and agrees that meaningful access may entail providing language assistance services, including oral interpretation and written translation where necessary, to ensure effective communication in the Recipient’s programs, services, and activities. 3. Recipient agrees to consider the need for language services for LEP persons when Recipient develops applicable budgets and conducts programs, services, and activities. As a resource, the Department of the Treasury has published its LEP guidance at 70 FR 6067. For more information on taking reasonable steps to provide meaningful access for LEP persons, please visit http://www.lep.gov. 44 Draft18 4. Recipient acknowledges and agrees that compliance with the assurances constitutes a condition of continued receipt of federal financial assistance and is binding upon Recipient and Recipient’s successors, transferees, and assignees for the period in which such assistance is provided. 5. Recipient acknowledges and agrees that it must require any sub-grantees, contractors, subcontractors, successors, transferees, and assignees to comply with assurances 1-4 above, and agrees to incorporate the following language in every contract or agreement subject to Title VI and its regulations between the Recipient and the Recipient’s sub-grantees, contractors, subcontractors, successors, transferees, and assignees: The sub-grantee, contractor, subcontractor, successor, transferee, and assignee shall comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits recipients of federal financial assistance from excluding from a program or activity, denying benefits of, or otherwise discriminating against a person on the basis of race, color, or national origin (42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq.), as implemented by the Department of the Treasury’s Title VI regulations, 31 CFR Part 22, which are herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this contract (or agreement). Title VI also includes protection to persons with “Limited English Proficiency” in any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq., as implemented by the Department of the Treasury’s Title VI regulations, 31 CFR Part 22, and herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this contract or agreement. 6. Recipient understands and agrees that if any real property or structure is provided or improved with the aid of federal financial assistance by the Department of the Treasury, this assurance obligates the Recipient, or in the case of a subsequent transfer, the transferee, for the period during which the real property or structure is used for a purpose for which the federal financial assistance is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits. If any personal property is provided, this assurance obligates the Recipient for the period during which it retains ownership or possession of the property. 7. Recipient shall cooperate in any enforcement or compliance review activities by the Department of the Treasury of the aforementioned obligations. Enforcement may include investigation, arbitration, mediation, litigation, and monitoring of any settlement agreements that may result from these actions. The Recipient shall comply with information requests, on-site compliance reviews and reporting requirements. 8. Recipient shall maintain a complaint log and inform the Department of the Treasury of any complaints of discrimination on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, and limited English proficiency covered by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and implementing regulations and provide, upon request, a list of all such reviews or proceedings based on the complaint, pending or completed, including outcome. Recipient also must inform the Department of the Treasury if Recipient has received no complaints under Title VI. 9. Recipient must provide documentation of an administrative agency’s or court’s findings of non-compliance of Title VI and efforts to address the non-compliance, including any voluntary compliance or other 45 Draft19 agreements between the Recipient and the administrative agency that made the finding. If the Recipient settles a case or matter alleging such discrimination, the Recipient must provide documentation of the settlement. If Recipient has not been the subject of any court or administrative agency finding of discrimination, please so state. 10. If the Recipient makes sub-awards to other agencies or other entities, the Recipient is responsible for ensuring that sub-recipients also comply with Title VI and other applicable authorities covered in this document State agencies that make sub-awards must have in place standard grant assurances and review procedures to demonstrate that that they are effectively monitoring the civil rights compliance of sub- recipients. The United States of America has the right to seek judicial enforcement of the terms of this assurances document and nothing in this document alters or limits the federal enforcement measures that the United States may take in order to address violations of this document or applicable federal law. Under penalty of perjury, the undersigned official(s) certifies that official(s) has read and understood the Recipient’s obligations as herein described, that any information submitted in conjunction with this assurances document is accurate and complete, and that the Recipient is in compliance with the aforementioned nondiscrimination requirements. Winter Springs, City of Date Signature of Authorized Official PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT NOTICE The information collected will be used for the U.S. Government to process requests for support. The estimated burden associated with this collection of information is 30 minutes per response. Comments concerning the accuracy of this burden estimate and suggestions for reducing this burden should be directed to the Office of Privacy, Transparency and Records, Department of the Treasury, 1500 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20220. DO NOT send the form to this address. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid control number assigned by OMB. 46 Draft20 OMB Approved No. 1505-0271 Expiration Date: November 30, 2021 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS Recipient name and address: Winter Springs, City of Address: DUNS Number: 025212655 Taxpayer Identification Number: 591026364 Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Sections 602(b) and 603(b) of the Social Security Act (the Act) as added by section 9901 of the American Rescue Plan Act, Pub. L. No. 117-2 (March 11, 2021) authorize the Department of the Treasury (Treasury) to make payments to certain recipients from the Coronavirus State Fiscal Recovery Fund and the Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Fund. Recipient hereby agrees, as a condition to receiving such payment from Treasury, to the terms attached hereto. Recipient: Winter Springs, City of Authorized Representative: Title: Date signed: U.S.Department of the Treasury: Authorized Representative: Title: Date: PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT NOTICE The information collected will be used for the U.S. Government to process requests for support. The estimated burden associated with this collection of information is 15 minutes per response. Comments concerning the accuracy of this burden estimate and suggestions for reducing this burden should be directed to the Office of Privacy, Transparency and Records, Department of the Treasury, 1500 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20220. DO NOT send the form to this address. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid control number assigned by OMB. 47 Draft22 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY CORONAVIRUS LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUND AWARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS Use of Funds. a.Recipient understands and agrees that the funds disbursed under this award may only be used in compliance with section 603(c) of the Social Security Act (the Act), Treasury’s regulations implementing that section, and guidance issued by Treasury regarding the foregoing. b.Recipient will determine prior to engaging in any project using this assistance that it has the institutional, managerial, and financial capability to ensure proper planning, management, and completion of such project. Period of Performance. The period of performance for this award begins on the date hereof and ends on December 31, 2026. As set forth in Treasury’s implementing regulations, Recipient may use award funds to cover eligible costs incurred during the period that begins on March 3, 2021, and ends on December 31, 2024. Reporting. Recipient agrees to comply with any reporting obligations established by Treasury as they relate to this award. Maintenance of and Access to Records a.Recipient shall maintain records and financial documents sufficient to evidence compliance with section 603(c) of the Act, Treasury’s regulations implementing that section, and guidance issued by Treasury regarding the foregoing. b.The Treasury Office of Inspector General and the Government Accountability Office, or their authorized representatives, shall have the right of access to records (electronic and otherwise) of Recipient in order to conduct audits or other investigations. c.Records shall be maintained by Recipient for a period of five (5) years after all funds have been expended or returned to Treasury, whichever is later. Pre-award Costs. Pre-award costs, as defined in 2 C.F.R. § 200.458, may not be paid with funding from this award. Administrative Costs. Recipient may use funds provided under this award to cover both direct and indirect costs. Cost Sharing. Cost sharing or matching funds are not required to be provided by Recipient. Conflicts of Interest. Recipient understands and agrees it must maintain a conflict of interest policy consistent with 2 C.F.R. § 200.318(c) and that such conflict of interest policy is applicable to each activity funded under this award. Recipient and subrecipients must disclose in writing to Treasury or the pass-through entity, as appropriate, any potential conflict of interest affecting the awarded funds in accordance with 2 C.F.R. § 200.112. 48 Draft23 Compliance with Applicable Law and Regulations. a.Recipient agrees to comply with the requirements of section 603 of the Act, regulations adopted by Treasury pursuant to section 603(f) of the Act, and guidance issued by Treasury regarding the foregoing. Recipient also agrees to comply with all other applicable federal statutes, regulations, and executive orders, and Recipient shall provide for such compliance by other parties in any agreements it enters into with other parties relating to this award. b.Federal regulations applicable to this award include, without limitation, the following: i.Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, 2 C.F.R. Part 200, other than such provisions as Treasury may determine are inapplicable to this Award and subject to such exceptions as may be otherwise provided by Treasury. Subpart F – Audit Requirements of the Uniform Guidance, implementing the Single Audit Act, shall apply to this award. ii.Universal Identifier and System for Award Management (SAM), 2 C.F.R. Part 25, pursuant to which the award term set forth in Appendix A to 2 C.F.R. Part 25 is hereby incorporated by reference. iii.Reporting Subaward and Executive Compensation Information, 2 C.F.R. Part 170, pursuant to which the award term set forth in Appendix A to 2 C.F.R. Part 170 is hereby incorporated by reference. iv.OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement), 2 C.F.R. Part 180, including the requirement to include a term or condition in all lower tier covered transactions (contracts and subcontracts described in 2 C.F.R. Part 180, subpart B) that the award is subject to 2 C.F.R. Part 180 and Treasury’s implementing regulation at 31 C.F.R. Part 19. v.Recipient Integrity and Performance Matters, pursuant to which the award term set forth in 2 C.F.R. Part 200, Appendix XII to Part 200 is hereby incorporated by reference. vi.Governmentwide Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace, 31 C.F.R. Part 20. vii.New Restrictions on Lobbying, 31 C.F.R. Part 21. viii.Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisitions Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. §§ 4601-4655) and implementing regulations. ix.Generally applicable federal environmental laws and regulations. c.Statutes and regulations prohibiting discrimination applicable to this award include, without limitation, the following: i.Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. §§ 2000d et seq.) and 49 Draft24 Treasury’s implementing regulations at 31 C.F.R. Part 22, which prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin under programs or activities receiving federal financial assistance; ii.The Fair Housing Act, Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. §§ 3601 et seq.), which prohibits discrimination in housing on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, familial status, or disability; iii.Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. § 794), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance; iv.The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended (42 U.S.C. §§ 6101 et seq.), and Treasury’s implementing regulations at 31 C.F.R. Part 23, which prohibit discrimination on the basis of age in programs or activities receiving federal financial assistance; and v.Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended (42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq.), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability under programs, activities, and services provided or made available by state and local governments or instrumentalities or agencies thereto. Remedial Actions. In the event of Recipient’s noncompliance with section 603 of the Act, other applicable laws, Treasury’s implementing regulations, guidance, or any reporting or other program requirements, Treasury may impose additional conditions on the receipt of a subsequent tranche of future award funds, if any, or take other available remedies as set forth in 2 C.F.R. § 200.339. In the case of a violation of section 603(c) of the Act regarding the use of funds, previous payments shall be subject to recoupment as provided in section 603(e) of the Act. Hatch Act. Recipient agrees to comply, as applicable, with requirements of the Hatch Act (5 U.S.C.§§ 1501-1508 and 7324-7328), which limit certain political activities of State or local government employees whose principal employment is in connection with an activity financed in whole or in part by this federal assistance. False Statements. Recipient understands that making false statements or claims in connection with this award is a violation of federal law and may result in criminal, civil, or administrative sanctions, including fines, imprisonment, civil damages and penalties, debarment from participating in federal awards or contracts, and/or any other remedy available by law. Publications. Any publications produced with funds from this award must display the following language: “This project [is being] [was] supported, in whole or in part, by federal award number [enter project FAIN] awarded to [name of Recipient] by the U.S. Department of the Treasury.” Debts Owed the Federal Government. a.Any funds paid to Recipient (1) in excess of the amount to which Recipient is finally determined to be authorized to retain under the terms of this award; (2) that are 50 Draft25 determined by the Treasury Office of Inspector General to have been misused; or (3) that are determined by Treasury to be subject to a repayment obligation pursuant to section 603(e) of the Act and have not been repaid by Recipient shall constitute a debt to the federal government. b.Any debts determined to be owed the federal government must be paid promptly by Recipient. A debt is delinquent if it has not been paid by the date specified in Treasury’s initial written demand for payment, unless other satisfactory arrangements have been made or if the Recipient knowingly or improperly retains funds that are a debt as defined in paragraph 14(a). Treasury will take any actions available to it to collect such a debt. Disclaimer. a.The United States expressly disclaims any and all responsibility or liability to Recipient or third persons for the actions of Recipient or third persons resulting in death, bodily injury, property damages, or any other losses resulting in any way from the performance of this award or any other losses resulting in any way from the performance of this award or any contract, or subcontract under this award. b.The acceptance of this award by Recipient does not in any way establish an agency relationship between the United States and Recipient. Protections for Whistleblowers. a.In accordance with 41 U.S.C. § 4712, Recipient may not discharge, demote, or otherwise discriminate against an employee in reprisal for disclosing to any of the list of persons or entities provided below, information that the employee reasonably believes is evidence of gross mismanagement of a federal contract or grant, a gross waste of federal funds, an abuse of authority relating to a federal contract or grant, a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety, or a violation of law, rule, or regulation related to a federal contract (including the competition for or negotiation of a contract) or grant. b.The list of persons and entities referenced in the paragraph above includes the following: i.A member of Congress or a representative of a committee of Congress; ii.An Inspector General; iii.The Government Accountability Office; iv.A Treasury employee responsible for contract or grant oversight or management; v.An authorized official of the Department of Justice or other law enforcement agency; vi.A court or grand jury; or vii.A management official or other employee of Recipient, contractor, or subcontractor who has the responsibility to investigate, discover, or address misconduct. c.Recipient shall inform its employees in writing of the rights and remedies provided under this section, in the predominant native language of the workforce. Increasing Seat Belt Use in the United States. Pursuant to Executive Order 13043, 62 FR 51 Draft26 19217 (Apr. 18, 1997), Recipient should encourage its contractors to adopt and enforce on- the- job seat belt policies and programs for their employees when operating company- owned, rented or personally owned vehicles. Reducing Text Messaging While Driving. Pursuant to Executive Order 13513, 74 FR 51225 (Oct. 6, 2009), Recipient should encourage its employees, subrecipients, and contractors to adopt and enforce policies that ban text messaging while driving, and Recipient should establish workplace safety policies to decrease accidents caused by distracted drivers. 52 53 26786 Federal Register /Vol. 86, No. 93/Monday, May 17, 2021/Rules and Regulations 1Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, COVID Data Tracker, http://www.covid.cdc.gov/ covid-data-tracker/#datatracker-home (last visited May 8, 2021). 2U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Unemployment Rate [UNRATE], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; https:// fred.stlouisfed.org/series/UNRATE, May 3, 2021. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employment Level [LNU02000000], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; https:// fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNU02000000, May 3, 2021. 3U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, All Employees, Total Nonfarm [PAYEMS], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; https:// fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PAYEMS, May 7, 2021. 4Nirmita Panchal et al., The Implications of COVID–19 for Mental Health and Substance Abuse (Feb. 10, 2021), https://www.kff.org/coronavirus- covid-19/issue-brief/the-implications-of-covid-19- for-mental-health-and-substance-use/#:∼:text= Older%20adults%20are%20also%20 more,prior%20to%20the%20current%20crisis; U.S. Census Bureau, Household Pulse Survey: Measuring Social and Economic Impacts during the Coronavirus Pandemic, https://www.census.gov/ programs-surveys/household-pulse-survey.html (last visited Apr. 26, 2021); Rebecca T. Leeb et al., Mental Health-Related Emergency Department Visits Among Children Aged <18 Years During the COVID Pandemic—United States, January 1— October 17, 2020, Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 69(45):1675–80 (Nov. 13, 2020), https:// www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/ mm6945a3.htm. 5Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Monetary Policy Report (June 12, 2020), https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/ 2020-06-mpr-summary.htm. 6Joseph R. Biden, Remarks by President Biden on Helping Small Businesses (Feb. 22, 2021), https:// www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches- remarks/2021/02/22/remarks-by-president-biden- on-helping-small-businesses/. 7Michael Leachman, House Budget Bill Provides Needed Fiscal Aid for States, Localities, Tribal Nations, and Territories (Feb. 10, 2021), https:// www.cbpp.org/research/state-budget-and-tax/ house-budget-bill-provides-needed-fiscal-aid-for- states-localities. 8U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, All Employees, State Government [CES9092000001] and All Employees, Local Government [CES9093000001], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/ CES9092000001 and https://fred.stlouisfed.org/ series/CES9093000001 (last visited May 8, 2021). DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 31 CFR Part 35 RIN 1505–AC77 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds AGENCY: Department of the Treasury. ACTION: Interim final rule. SUMMARY: The Secretary of the Treasury (Treasury) is issuing this interim final rule to implement the Coronavirus State Fiscal Recovery Fund and the Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Fund established under the American Rescue Plan Act. DATES: Effective date: The provisions in this interim final rule are effective May 17, 2021. Comment date: Comments must be received on or before July 16, 2021. ADDRESSES: Please submit comments electronically through the Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Comments can be mailed to the Office of the Undersecretary for Domestic Finance, Department of the Treasury, 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20220. Because postal mail may be subject to processing delay, it is recommended that comments be submitted electronically. All comments should be captions with ‘‘Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Interim Final Rule Comments.’’ Please include your name, organization affiliation, address, email address and telephone number in your comment. Where appropriate, a comment should include a short executive summary. In general, comments received will be posted on http://www.regulations.gov without change, including any business or personal information provided. Comments received, including attachments and other supporting materials, will be part of the public record and subject to public disclosure. Do not enclose any information in your comment or supporting materials that you consider confidential or inappropriate for public disclosure. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katharine Richards, Senior Advisor, Office of Recovery Programs, Department of the Treasury, (844) 529– 9527. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background Information A. Overview Since the first case of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID–19) was discovered in the United States in January 2020, the disease has infected over 32 million and killed over 575,000 Americans.1 The disease has impacted every part of life: As social distancing became a necessity, businesses closed, schools transitioned to remote education, travel was sharply reduced, and millions of Americans lost their jobs. In April 2020, the national unemployment rate reached its highest level in over seventy years following the most severe month-over-month decline in employment on record.2 As of April 2021, there were still 8.2 million fewer jobs than before the pandemic.3 During this time, a significant share of households have faced food and housing insecurity.4 Economic disruptions impaired the flow of credit to households, State and local governments, and businesses of all sizes.5 As businesses weathered closures and sharp declines in revenue, many were forced to shut down, especially small businesses.6 Amid this once-in-a-century crisis, State, territorial, Tribal, and local governments (State, local, and Tribal governments) have been called on to respond at an immense scale. Governments have faced myriad needs to prevent and address the spread of COVID–19, including testing, contact tracing, isolation and quarantine, public communications, issuance and enforcement of health orders, expansions to health system capacity like alternative care facilities, and in recent months, a massive nationwide mobilization around vaccinations. Governments also have supported major efforts to prevent COVID–19 spread through safety measures in settings like nursing homes, schools, congregate living settings, dense worksites, incarceration settings, and public facilities. The pandemic’s impacts on behavioral health, including the toll of pandemic-related stress, have increased the need for behavioral health resources. At the same time, State, local and Tribal governments launched major efforts to address the economic impacts of the pandemic. These efforts have been tailored to the needs of their communities and have included expanded assistance to unemployed workers; food assistance; rent, mortgage, and utility support; cash assistance; internet access programs; expanded services to support individuals experiencing homelessness; support for individuals with disabilities and older adults; and assistance to small businesses facing closures or revenue loss or implementing new safety measures. In responding to the public health emergency and its negative economic impacts, State, local, and Tribal governments have seen substantial increases in costs to provide these services, often amid substantial declines in revenue due to the economic downturn and changing economic patterns during the pandemic.7 Facing these budget challenges, many State, local, and Tribal governments have been forced to make cuts to services or their workforces, or delay critical investments. From February to May of 2020, State, local, and Tribal governments reduced their workforces by more than 1.5 million jobs and, in April of 2021, State, local, and Tribal government employment remained nearly 1.3 million jobs below pre- pandemic levels.8 These cuts to State, local, and Tribal government workforces VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:28 May 14, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\17MYR2.SGM 17MYR2 54 26787 Federal Register /Vol. 86, No. 93/Monday, May 17, 2021/Rules and Regulations 9Tracy Gordon, State and Local Budgets and the Great Recession, Brookings Institution (Dec. 31, 2012), http://www.brookings.edu/articles/state-and- local-budgets-and-the-great-recession. 10Sebastian D. Romano et al., Trends in Racial and Ethnic Disparities in COVID–19 Hospitalizations, by Region—United States, March– December 2020, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021, 70:560–565 (Apr. 16, 2021), https:// www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/ mm7015e2.htm?s_cid=mm7015e2_w. 11Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Tracking the COVID–19 Recession’s Effects on Food, Housing, and Employment Hardships, https://www.cbpp.org/research/poverty-and- inequality/tracking-the-covid-19-recessions-effects- on-housing-and (last visited May 4, 2021). 12Lisa R. Fortuna et al., Inequity and the Disproportionate Impact of COVID–19 on Communities of Color in the United States: The Need for Trauma-Informed Social Justice Response, Psychological Trauma Vol. 12(5):443–45 (2020), available at https://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/2020- 37320-001.pdf. 13Emily Vogles et al., 53% of Americans Say the internet Has Been Essential During the COVID–19 Outbreak (Apr. 30, 2020), https:// www.pewresearch.org/internet/2020/04/30/53-of- americans-say-the-internet-has-been-essential- during-the-covid-19-outbreak/. 14Emma Dorn et al., COVID–19 and student learning in the United States: The hurt could last a lifetime (June 2020), https:// webtest.childrensinstitute.net/sites/default/files/ documents/COVID-19-and-student-learning-in-the- United-States_FINAL.pdf; Andrew Bacher-Hicks et al., Inequality in Household Adaptation to Schooling Shocks: Covid-Induced Online Engagement in Real Time, J. of Public Econ. Vol. 193(C) (July 2020), available at https:// www.nber.org/papers/w27555. 15See, e.g., Tyler Atkinson & Alex Richter, Pandemic Disproportionately Affects Women, Minority Labor Force Participation, https:// www.dallasfed.org/research/economics/2020/1110 (last visited May 9, 2021); Jared Bernstein & Janelle Jones, The Impact of the COVID19 Recession on the Jobs and Incomes of Persons of Color, https:// www.cbpp.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/6-2- 20bud_0.pdf (last visited May 9, 2021). 16American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA), sec. 9901, Public Law 117–2, codified at 42 U.S.C. 802 et seq. The term ‘‘state’’ as used in this SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION and defined in section 602 of the Act means each of the 50 States and the District of Columbia. The term ‘‘territory’’ as used in this SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATIONand defined in section 602 of the Act means the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, Guam, the Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands, and American Samoa. Tribal government is defined in the Act and the interim final rule to mean ‘‘the recognized governing body of any Indian or Alaska Native tribe, band, nation, pueblo, village, community, component band, or component reservation, individually identified (including parenthetically) in the list published most recently as of the date of enactment of the [American Rescue Plan Act] pursuant to section 104 of the Federally Recognized Indian Tribe List Act of 1994 (25 U.S.C. 5131).’’ See section 602(g)(7) of the Social Security Act, as added by the American Rescue Plan Act. On January 29, 2021, the Bureau of Indian Affairs published a current list of 574 Tribal entities. See 86 FR 7554, January 29, 2021. The term ‘‘local governments’’ as used in this SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION includes metropolitan cities, counties, and nonentitlement units of local government. 1742 U.S.C. 801 et seq. 18Sections 602, 603 of the Act. 19The CRF was established by the section 601 of the Act as added by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act), Public Law 116–136, 134 Stat. 281 (2020). come at a time when demand for government services is high, with State, local, and Tribal governments on the frontlines of fighting the pandemic. Furthermore, State, local, and Tribal government austerity measures can hamper overall economic growth, as occurred in the recovery from the Great Recession.9 Finally, although the pandemic’s impacts have been widespread, both the public health and economic impacts of the pandemic have fallen most severely on communities and populations disadvantaged before it began. Low- income communities, people of color, and Tribal communities have faced higher rates of infection, hospitalization, and death,10 as well as higher rates of unemployment and lack of basic necessities like food and housing.11 Pre- existing social vulnerabilities magnified the pandemic in these communities, where a reduced ability to work from home and, frequently, denser housing amplified the risk of infection. Higher rates of pre-existing health conditions also may have contributed to more severe COVID–19 health outcomes.12 Similarly, communities or households facing economic insecurity before the pandemic were less able to weather business closures, job losses, or declines in earnings and were less able to participate in remote work or education due to the inequities in access to reliable and affordable broadband infrastructure.13 Finally, though schools in all areas faced challenges, those in high poverty areas had fewer resources to adapt to remote and hybrid learning models.14 Unfortunately, the pandemic also has reversed many gains made by communities of color in the prior economic expansion.15 B. The Statute and Interim Final Rule On March 11, 2021, the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) was signed into law by the President.16 Section 9901 of ARPA amended Title VI of the Social Security Act17 (the Act) to add section 602, which establishes the Coronavirus State Fiscal Recovery Fund, and section 603, which establishes the Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (together, the Fiscal Recovery Funds).18 The Fiscal Recovery Funds are intended to provide support to State, local, and Tribal governments (together, recipients) in responding to the impact of COVID–19 and in their efforts to contain COVID– 19 on their communities, residents, and businesses. The Fiscal Recovery Funds build on and expand the support provided to these governments over the last year, including through the Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF).19 Through the Fiscal Recovery Funds, Congress provided State, local, and Tribal governments with significant resources to respond to the COVID–19 public health emergency and its economic impacts through four categories of eligible uses. Section 602 and section 603 contain the same eligible uses; the primary difference between the two sections is that section 602 establishes a fund for States, territories, and Tribal governments and section 603 establishes a fund for metropolitan cities, nonentitlement units of local government, and counties. Sections 602(c)(1) and 603(c)(1) provide that funds may be used: (a) To respond to the public health emergency or its negative economic impacts, including assistance to households, small businesses, and nonprofits, or aid to impacted industries such as tourism, travel, and hospitality; (b) To respond to workers performing essential work during the COVID–19 public health emergency by providing premium pay to eligible workers; (c) For the provision of government services to the extent of the reduction in revenue due to the COVID–19 public health emergency relative to revenues collected in the most recent full fiscal year prior to the emergency; and (d) To make necessary investments in water, sewer, or broadband infrastructure. In addition, Congress clarified two types of uses which do not fall within these four categories. Sections 602(c)(2)(B) and 603(c)(2) provide that these eligible uses do not include, and thus funds may not be used for, depositing funds into any pension fund. Section 602(c)(2)(A) also provides, for States and territories, that the eligible uses do not include ‘‘directly or indirectly offset[ting] a reduction in the net tax revenue of [the] State or territory resulting from a change in law, regulation, or administrative interpretation.’’ The ARPA provides a substantial infusion of resources to meet pandemic response needs and rebuild a stronger, more equitable economy as the country recovers. First, payments from the Fiscal Recovery Funds help to ensure that State, local, and Tribal governments have the resources needed to continue to take actions to decrease the spread of COVID–19 and bring the pandemic under control. Payments from the Fiscal Recovery Funds may also be used by recipients to provide support for costs incurred in addressing public health and economic challenges resulting from the pandemic, including resources to offer premium pay to essential workers, in recognition of their sacrifices over the VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:28 May 14, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\17MYR2.SGM 17MYR2 55 26788 Federal Register /Vol. 86, No. 93/Monday, May 17, 2021/Rules and Regulations 20Sections 602(c)(1)(A), 603(c)(1)(A) of the Act. 21Press Release, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, First Travel-related Case of 2019 Novel Coronavirus Detected in United States (Jan. 21, 2020), https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2020/ p0121-novel-coronavirus-travel-case.html. 22Anne Schuchat et al., Public Health Response to the Initiation and Spread of Pandemic COVID– 19 in the United States, February 24–April 21, 2021, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021, 69(18):551– 56 (May 8, 2021), https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/ volumes/69/wr/mm6918e2.htm. last year. Recipients may also use payments from the Fiscal Recovery Funds to replace State, local, and Tribal government revenue lost due to COVID– 19, helping to ensure that governments can continue to provide needed services and avoid cuts or layoffs. Finally, these resources lay the foundation for a strong, equitable economic recovery, not only by providing immediate economic stabilization for households and businesses, but also by addressing the systemic public health and economic challenges that may have contributed to more severe impacts of the pandemic among low-income communities and people of color. Within the eligible use categories outlined in the Fiscal Recovery Funds provisions of ARPA, State, local, and Tribal governments have flexibility to determine how best to use payments from the Fiscal Recovery Funds to meet the needs of their communities and populations. The interim final rule facilitates swift and effective implementation by establishing a framework for determining the types of programs and services that are eligible under the ARPA along with examples of uses that State, local, and Tribal governments may consider. These uses build on eligible expenditures under the CRF, including some expansions in eligible uses to respond to the public health emergency, such as vaccination campaigns. They also reflect changes in the needs of communities, as evidenced by, for example, nationwide data demonstrating disproportionate impacts of the COVID–19 public health emergency on certain populations, geographies, and economic sectors. The interim final rule takes into consideration these disproportionate impacts by recognizing a broad range of eligible uses to help States, local, and Tribal governments support the families, businesses, and communities hardest hit by the COVID–19 public health emergency. Implementation of the Fiscal Recovery Funds also reflect the importance of public input, transparency, and accountability. Treasury seeks comment on all aspects of the interim final rule and, to better facilitate public comment, has included specific questions throughout this SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. Treasury encourages State, local, and Tribal governments in particular to provide feedback and to engage with Treasury regarding issues that may arise regarding all aspects of this interim final rule and Treasury’s work in administering the Fiscal Recovery Funds. In addition, the interim final rule establishes certain regular reporting requirements, including by requiring State, local, and Tribal governments to publish information regarding uses of Fiscal Recovery Funds payments in their local jurisdiction. These reporting requirements reflect the need for transparency and accountability, while recognizing and minimizing the burden, particularly for smaller local governments. Treasury urges State, territorial, Tribal, and local governments to engage their constituents and communities in developing plans to use these payments, given the scale of funding and its potential to catalyze broader economic recovery and rebuilding. II. Eligible Uses A. Public Health and Economic Impacts Sections 602(c)(1)(A) and 603(c)(1)(A) provide significant resources for State, territorial, Tribal governments, and counties, metropolitan cities, and nonentitlement units of local governments (each referred to as a recipient) to meet the wide range of public health and economic impacts of the COVID–19 public health emergency. These provisions authorize the use of payments from the Fiscal Recovery Funds to respond to the public health emergency with respect to COVID–19 or its negative economic impacts. Section 602 and section 603 also describe several types of uses that would be responsive to the impacts of the COVID– 19 public health emergency, including assistance to households, small businesses, and nonprofits and aid to impacted industries, such as tourism, travel, and hospitality.20 Accordingly, to assess whether a program or service is included in this category of eligible uses, a recipient should consider whether and how the use would respond to the COVID–19 public health emergency. Assessing whether a program or service ‘‘responds to’’ the COVID–19 public health emergency requires the recipient to, first, identify a need or negative impact of the COVID–19 public health emergency and, second, identify how the program, service, or other intervention addresses the identified need or impact. While the COVID–19 public health emergency affected many aspects of American life, eligible uses under this category must be in response to the disease itself or the harmful consequences of the economic disruptions resulting from or exacerbated by the COVID–19 public health emergency. The interim final rule implements these provisions by identifying a non- exclusive list of programs or services that may be funded as responding to COVID–19 or the negative economic impacts of the COVID–19 public health emergency, along with considerations for evaluating other potential uses of the Fiscal Recovery Funds not explicitly listed. The interim final rule also provides flexibility for recipients to use payments from the Fiscal Recovery Funds for programs or services that are not identified on these non-exclusive lists but that fall under the terms of section 602(c)(1)(A) or 603(c)(1)(A) by responding to the COVID–19 public health emergency or its negative economic impacts. As an example, in determining whether a program or service responds to the negative economic impacts of the COVID–19 public health emergency, the interim final rule provides that payments from the Fiscal Recovery Funds should be designed to address an economic harm resulting from or exacerbated by the public health emergency. Recipients should assess the connection between the negative economic harm and the COVID–19 public health emergency, the nature and extent of that harm, and how the use of this funding would address such harm. As discussed, the pandemic and the necessary actions taken to control the spread had a severe impact on households and small businesses, including in particular low-income workers and communities and people of color. While eligible uses under sections 602(c)(1)(A) and 603(c)(1)(A) provide flexibility to recipients to identify the most pressing local needs, Treasury encourages recipients to provide assistance to those households, businesses, and non-profits in communities most disproportionately impacted by the pandemic. 1. Responding to COVID–19 On January 21, 2020, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) identified the first case of novel coronavirus in the United States.21 By late March, the virus had spread to many States and the first wave was growing rapidly, centered in the northeast.22 This wave brought acute VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:28 May 14, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\17MYR2.SGM 17MYR2 56 26789 Federal Register /Vol. 86, No. 93/Monday, May 17, 2021/Rules and Regulations 23Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, COVID Data Tracker: Trends in Number of COVID–19 Cases and Deaths in the US Reported to CDC, by State/Territory, https://covid.cdc.gov/ covid-data-tracker/#trends_dailytrendscases (last visited May 8, 2021). 24Id. 25Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, COVID Data Tracker: COVID–19 Vaccinations in the United States, https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data- tracker/#vaccinations (last visited May 8, 2021). 26Panchal, supra note 4; Mark E´. Czeisler et al., Mental Health, Substance Abuse, and Suicidal Ideation During COVID–19 Pandemic– United States, June 24–30 2020, Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 69(32):1049–57 (Aug. 14, 2020), https:// www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/ mm6932a1.htm. 27Leeb, supra note 4. 28Centers for Disease Prevention and Control, National Center for Health Statistics, Provisional Drug Overdose Death Counts, https://www.cdc.gov/ nchs/nvss/vsrr/drug-overdose-data.htm (last visited May 8, 2021). 29Megan L. Evans, et al., A Pandemic within a Pandemic—Intimate Partner Violence during Covid–19, N. Engl. J. Med. 383:2302–04 (Dec. 10, 2020), available at https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/ 10.1056/NEJMp2024046. 30Jeanne M. Santoli et al., Effects of the COVID–19 Pandemic on Routine Pediatric Vaccine Ordering and Administration—United States, Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 69(19):591–93 (May 8, 2020), https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/ mm6919e2.htm; Marisa Langdon-Embry et al., Notes from the Field: Rebound in Routine Childhood Vaccine Administration Following Decline During the COVID–19 Pandemic—New York City, March 1–June 27, 2020, Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 69(30):999–1001 (Jul. 31 2020), https:// www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/ mm6930a3.htm. 31Office of the White House, National Strategy for the COVID–19 Response and Pandemic Preparedness (Jan. 21, 2021), https:// www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/ National-Strategy-for-the-COVID-19-Response-and- Pandemic-Preparedness.pdf. 32In a study of 13 states from October to December 2020, the CDC found that Hispanic or Latino and Native American or Alaska Native individuals were 1.7 times more likely to visit an emergency room for COVID–19 than White individuals, and Black individuals were 1.4 times more likely to do so than White individuals. See Romano, supra note 10. 33Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, COVID Data Tracker: Trends in COVID–19 Cases and Deaths in the United States, by County-level Population Factors, https://covid.cdc.gov/covid- data-tracker/#pop-factors_totaldeaths (last visited May 8, 2021). 34The CDC’s Social Vulnerability Index includes fifteen variables measuring social vulnerability, including unemployment, poverty, education levels, single-parent households, disability status, non-English speaking households, crowded housing, and transportation access. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, COVID Data Tracker: Trends in COVID–19 Cases Continued strain on health care and public health systems: Hospitals and emergency medical services struggled to manage a major influx of patients; response personnel faced shortages of personal protective equipment; testing for the virus was scarce; and congregate living facilities like nursing homes and prisons saw rapid spread. State, local, and Tribal governments mobilized to support the health care system, issue public health orders to mitigate virus spread, and communicate safety measures to the public. The United States has since faced at least two additional COVID–19 waves that brought many similar challenges: The second in the summer, centered in the south and southwest, and a wave throughout the fall and winter, in which the virus reached a point of uncontrolled spread across the country and over 3,000 people died per day.23 By early May 2021, the United States has experienced over 32 million confirmed COVID–19 cases and over 575,000 deaths.24 Mitigating the impact of COVID–19, including taking actions to control its spread and support hospitals and health care workers caring for the sick, continues to require a major public health response from State, local and Tribal governments. New or heightened public health needs include COVID–19 testing, major expansions in contact tracing, support for individuals in isolation or quarantine, enforcement of public health orders, new public communication efforts, public health surveillance (e.g., monitoring case trends and genomic sequencing for variants), enhancement to health care capacity through alternative care facilities, and enhancement of public health data systems to meet new demands or scaling needs. State, local, and Tribal governments have also supported major efforts to prevent COVID–19 spread through safety measures at key settings like nursing homes, schools, congregate living settings, dense worksites, incarceration settings, and in other public facilities. This has included implementing infection prevention measures or making ventilation improvements in congregate settings, health care settings, or other key locations. Other response and adaptation costs include capital investments in public facilities to meet pandemic operational needs, such as physical plant improvements to public hospitals and health clinics or adaptations to public buildings to implement COVID–19 mitigation tactics. In recent months, State, local, and Tribal governments across the country have mobilized to support the national vaccination campaign, resulting in over 250 million doses administered to date.25 The need for public health measures to respond to COVID–19 will continue in the months and potentially years to come. This includes the continuation of the vaccination campaign for the general public and, if vaccinations are approved for children in the future, eventually for youths. This also includes monitoring the spread of COVID–19 variants, understanding the impact of these variants (especially on vaccination efforts), developing approaches to respond to those variants, and monitoring global COVID–19 trends to understand continued risks to the United States. Finally, the long-term health impacts of COVID–19 will continue to require a public health response, including medical services for individuals with ‘‘long COVID,’’ and research to understand how COVID–19 impacts future health needs and raises risks for the millions of Americans who have been infected. Other areas of public health have also been negatively impacted by the COVID–19 pandemic. For example, in one survey in January 2021, over 40 percent of American adults reported symptoms of depression or anxiety, up from 11 percent in the first half of 2019.26,The proportion of children’s emergency department visits related to mental health has also risen noticeably.27 Similarly, rates of substance misuse and overdose deaths have spiked: Preliminary data from the CDC show a nearly 30 percent increase in drug overdose mortality from September 2019 to September 2020.28 Stay-at-home orders and other pandemic responses may have also reduced the ability of individuals affected by domestic violence to access services.29 Finally, some preventative public health measures like childhood vaccinations have been deferred and potentially forgone.30 While the pandemic affected communities across the country, it disproportionately impacted some demographic groups and exacerbated health inequities along racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic lines.31 The CDC has found that racial and ethnic minorities are at increased risk for infection, hospitalization, and death from COVID–19, with Hispanic or Latino and Native American or Alaska Native patients at highest risk.32 Similarly, low-income and socially vulnerable communities have seen the most severe health impacts. For example, counties with high poverty rates also have the highest rates of infections and deaths, with 223 deaths per 100,000 compared to the U.S. average of 175 deaths per 100,000, as of May 2021.33 Counties with high social vulnerability, as measured by factors such as poverty and educational attainment, have also fared more poorly than the national average, with 211 deaths per 100,000 as of May 2021.34 VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:28 May 14, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\17MYR2.SGM 17MYR2 57 26790 Federal Register /Vol. 86, No. 93/Monday, May 17, 2021/Rules and Regulations and Deaths in the United States, by Social Vulnerability Index, https://covid.cdc.gov/covid- data-tracker/#pop-factors_totaldeaths (last visited May 8, 2021). 35Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Risk for COVID–19 Infection, Hospitalization, and Death By Race/Ethnicity, https://www.cdc.gov/ coronavirus/2019-ncov/covid-data/investigations- discovery/hospitalization-death-by-race- ethnicity.html (last visited Apr. 26, 2021). 36See, e.g., Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Risk of Severe Illness or Death from COVID–19 (Dec. 10, 2020), https://www.cdc.gov/ coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/health-equity/ racial-ethnic-disparities/disparities-illness.html (last visited Apr. 26, 2021). 37Milena Almagro et al., Racial Disparities in Frontline Workers and Housing Crowding During COVID–19: Evidence from Geolocation Data (Sept. 22, 2020), NYU Stern School of Business (forthcoming), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/ sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3695249; Grace McCormack et al., Economic Vulnerability of Households with Essential Workers, JAMA 324(4):388–90 (2020), available at https:// jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/ 2767630. 38See, e.g., Joseph G. Courtney et al., Decreases in Young Children Who Received Blood Lead Level Testing During COVID–19—34 Jurisdictions, January–May 2020, Morb. Mort. Wkly. Rep. 70(5):155–61 (Feb. 5, 2021), https://www.cdc.gov/ mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7005a2.htm; Emily A. Benfer & Lindsay F. Wiley, Health Justice Strategies to Combat COVID–19: Protecting Vulnerable Communities During a Pandemic, Health Affairs Blog (Mar. 19, 2020), https://www.healthaffairs.org/ do/10.1377/hblog20200319.757883/full/. 39See, e.g., Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, supra note 34; Benfer & Wiley, supra note 38; Nathaniel M. Lewis et al., Disparities in COVID–19 Incidence, Hospitalizations, and Testing, by Area-Level Deprivation—Utah, March 3–July 9, 2020, Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 69(38):1369–73 (Sept. 25, 2020), https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/ volumes/69/wr/mm6938a4.htm. 40This includes implementing mitigation strategies consistent with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Operational Strategy for K–12 Schools through Phased Prevention, available at https://www.cdc.gov/ coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/schools- childcare/operation-strategy.html. 41Many of these expenses were also eligible in the CRF. Generally, funding uses eligible under CRF as a response to the direct public health impacts of COVID–19 will continue to be eligible under the ARPA, including those not explicitly listed here (e.g., telemedicine costs, costs to facilitate compliance with public health orders, disinfection of public areas, facilitating distance learning, increased solid waste disposal needs related to PPE, paid sick and paid family and medical leave to public employees to enable compliance with COVID–19 public health precautions), with the following two exceptions: (1) The standard for eligibility of public health and safety payrolls has been updated (see section II.A of this SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION) and (2) expenses related to the issuance of tax-anticipation notes are no longer an eligible funding use (see discussion of debt service in section II.B of this SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). 42Coronavirus Relief Fund for States, Tribal Governments, and Certain Eligible Local Governments, 86 FR 4182 (Jan. 15, 2021), available at https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/136/CRF- Guidance-Federal-Register_2021-00827.pdf. 43Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, supra note 24. 44Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Long-Term Effects (Apr. 8, 2021), https:// www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/long-term- effects.html (last visited Apr. 26, 2021). 45Pursuant to 42 CFR 433.51 and 45 CFR 75.306, Fiscal Recovery Funds may not serve as a State or locality’s contribution of certain Federal funds. Over the last year, Native Americans have experienced more than one and a half times the rate of COVID–19 infections, more than triple the rate of hospitalizations, and more than double the death rate compared to White Americans.35 Low-income and minority communities also exhibit higher rates of pre-existing conditions that may contribute to an increased risk of COVID–19 mortality.36 In addition, individuals living in low- income communities may have had more limited ability to socially distance or to self-isolate when ill, resulting in faster spread of the virus, and were over-represented among essential workers, who faced greater risk of exposure.37 Social distancing measures in response to the pandemic may have also exacerbated pre-existing public health challenges. For example, for children living in homes with lead paint, spending substantially more time at home raises the risk of developing elevated blood lead levels, while screenings for elevated blood lead levels declined during the pandemic.38 The combination of these underlying social and health vulnerabilities may have contributed to more severe public health outcomes of the pandemic within these communities, resulting in an exacerbation of pre-existing disparities in health outcomes.39 Eligible Public Health Uses. The Fiscal Recovery Funds provide resources to meet and address these emergent public health needs, including through measures to counter the spread of COVID–19, through the provision of care for those impacted by the virus, and through programs or services that address disparities in public health that have been exacerbated by the pandemic. To facilitate implementation and use of payments from the Fiscal Recovery Funds, the interim final rule identifies a non-exclusive list of eligible uses of funding to respond to the COVID–19 public health emergency. Eligible uses listed under this section build and expand upon permissible expenditures under the CRF, while recognizing the differences between the ARPA and CARES Act, and recognizing that the response to the COVID–19 public health emergency has changed and will continue to change over time. To assess whether additional uses would be eligible under this category, recipients should identify an effect of COVID–19 on public health, including either or both of immediate effects or effects that may manifest over months or years, and assess how the use would respond to or address the identified need. The interim final rule identifies a non-exclusive list of uses that address the effects of the COVID–19 public health emergency, including: •COVID–19 Mitigation and Prevention. A broad range of services and programming are needed to contain COVID–19. Mitigation and prevention efforts for COVID–19 include vaccination programs; medical care; testing; contact tracing; support for isolation or quarantine; supports for vulnerable populations to access medical or public health services; public health surveillance (e.g., monitoring case trends, genomic sequencing for variants); enforcement of public health orders; public communication efforts; enhancement to health care capacity, including through alternative care facilities; purchases of personal protective equipment; support for prevention, mitigation, or other services in congregate living facilities (e.g., nursing homes, incarceration settings, homeless shelters, group living facilities) and other key settings like schools;40 ventilation improvements in congregate settings, health care settings, or other key locations; enhancement of public health data systems; and other public health responses.41 They also include capital investments in public facilities to meet pandemic operational needs, such as physical plant improvements to public hospitals and health clinics or adaptations to public buildings to implement COVID–19 mitigation tactics. These COVID–19 prevention and mitigation programs and services, among others, were eligible expenditures under the CRF and are eligible uses under this category of eligible uses for the Fiscal Recovery Funds.42 •Medical Expenses. The COVID–19 public health emergency continues to have devastating effects on public health; the United States continues to average hundreds of deaths per day and the spread of new COVID–19 variants has raised new risks and genomic surveillance needs.43 Moreover, our understanding of the potentially serious and long-term effects of the virus is growing, including the potential for symptoms like shortness of breath to continue for weeks or months, for multi- organ impacts from COVID–19, or for post-intensive care syndrome.44 State and local governments may need to continue to provide care and services to address these near- and longer-term needs.45 VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:28 May 14, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\17MYR2.SGM 17MYR2 58 26791 Federal Register /Vol. 86, No. 93/Monday, May 17, 2021/Rules and Regulations 46In general, if an employee’s wages and salaries are an eligible use of Fiscal Recovery Funds, recipients may treat the employee’s covered benefits as an eligible use of Fiscal Recovery Funds. For purposes of the Fiscal Recovery Funds, covered benefits include costs of all types of leave (vacation, family-related, sick, military, bereavement, sabbatical, jury duty), employee insurance (health, life, dental, vision), retirement (pensions, 401(k)), unemployment benefit plans (Federal and state), workers compensation insurance, and Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) taxes (which includes Social Security and Medicare taxes). 47Qualified Census Tracts are a common, readily- accessible, and geographically granular method of identifying communities with a large proportion of low-income residents. Using an existing measure may speed implementation and decrease administrative burden, while identifying areas of need at a highly-localized level. While QCTs are an effective tool generally, many tribal communities have households with a wide range of income levels due in part to non-tribal member, high income residents living in the community. Mixed income communities, with a significant share of tribal members at the lowest levels of income, are often not included as eligible QCTs yet tribal residents are experiencing disproportionate impacts due to the pandemic. Therefore, including all services provided by Tribal governments is a more effective means of ensuring that disproportionately impacted Tribal members can receive services. 48U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Qualified Census Tracts and Difficult Development Areas, https:// www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/qct.html (last visited Apr. 26, 2021); U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Indian Lands of Federally Recognized Tribes of the United States (June 2016), https://www.bia.gov/sites/bia.gov/files/ assets/bia/ots/webteam/pdf/idc1-028635.pdf (last visited Apr. 26, 2021). 49The social determinants of health are the social and environmental conditions that affect health outcomes, specifically economic stability, health care access, social context, neighborhoods and built environment, and education access. See, e.g., U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Healthy People 2030: Social Determinants of Health, https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives- and-data/social-determinants-health (last visited Apr. 26, 2021). 50National Commission on COVID–19 and Criminal Justice, Impact Report: COVID–19 and Crime (Jan. 31, 2021), https:// covid19.counciloncj.org/2021/01/31/impact-report- covid-19-and-crime-3/ (showing a spike in homicide and assaults); Brad Boesrup et al., Alarming Trends in US domestic violence during the COVID–19 pandemic, Am. J. of Emerg. Med. 38(12): 2753–55 (Dec. 1, 2020), available at https:// www.ajemjournal.com/article/S0735- 6757(20)30307-7/fulltext (showing a spike in domestic violence). •Behavioral Health Care. In addition, new or enhanced State, local, and Tribal government services may be needed to meet behavioral health needs exacerbated by the pandemic and respond to other public health impacts. These services include mental health treatment, substance misuse treatment, other behavioral health services, hotlines or warmlines, crisis intervention, overdose prevention, infectious disease prevention, and services or outreach to promote access to physical or behavioral health primary care and preventative medicine. •Public Health and Safety Staff. Treasury recognizes that responding to the public health and negative economic impacts of the pandemic, including administering the services described above, requires a substantial commitment of State, local, and Tribal government human resources. As a result, the Fiscal Recovery Funds may be used for payroll and covered benefits expenses for public safety, public health, health care, human services, and similar employees, to the extent that their services are devoted to mitigating or responding to the COVID–19 public health emergency.46 Accordingly, the Fiscal Recovery Funds may be used to support the payroll and covered benefits for the portion of the employee’s time that is dedicated to responding to the COVID–19 public health emergency. For administrative convenience, the recipient may consider public health and safety employees to be entirely devoted to mitigating or responding to the COVID–19 public health emergency, and therefore fully covered, if the employee, or his or her operating unit or division, is primarily dedicated to responding to the COVID–19 public health emergency. Recipients may consider other presumptions for assessing the extent to which an employee, division, or operating unit is engaged in activities that respond to the COVID–19 public health emergency, provided that the recipient reassesses periodically and maintains records to support its assessment, such as payroll records, attestations from supervisors or staff, or regular work product or correspondence demonstrating work on the COVID–19 response. Recipients need not routinely track staff hours. •Expenses to Improve the Design and Execution of Health and Public Health Programs. State, local, and Tribal governments may use payments from the Fiscal Recovery Funds to engage in planning and analysis in order to improve programs addressing the COVID–19 pandemic, including through use of targeted consumer outreach, improvements to data or technology infrastructure, impact evaluations, and data analysis. Eligible Uses to Address Disparities in Public Health Outcomes. In addition, in recognition of the disproportionate impacts of the COVID–19 pandemic on health outcomes in low-income and Native American communities and the importance of mitigating these effects, the interim final rule identifies a broader range of services and programs that will be presumed to be responding to the public health emergency when provided in these communities. Specifically, Treasury will presume that certain types of services, outlined below, are eligible uses when provided in a Qualified Census Tract (QCT),47 to families living in QCTs, or when these services are provided by Tribal governments.48 Recipients may also provide these services to other populations, households, or geographic areas that are disproportionately impacted by the pandemic. In identifying these disproportionately- impacted communities, recipients should be able to support their determination that the pandemic resulted in disproportionate public health or economic outcomes to the specific populations, households, or geographic areas to be served. Given the exacerbation of health disparities during the pandemic and the role of pre-existing social vulnerabilities in driving these disparate outcomes, services to address health disparities are presumed to be responsive to the public health impacts of the pandemic. Specifically, recipients may use payments from the Fiscal Recovery Funds to facilitate access to resources that improve health outcomes, including services that connect residents with health care resources and public assistance programs and build healthier environments, such as: •Funding community health workers to help community members access health services and services to address the social determinants of health;49 •Funding public benefits navigators to assist community members with navigating and applying for available Federal, State, and local public benefits or services; •Housing services to support healthy living environments and neighborhoods conducive to mental and physical wellness; •Remediation of lead paint or other lead hazards to reduce risk of elevated blood lead levels among children; and •Evidence-based community violence intervention programs to prevent violence and mitigate the increase in violence during the pandemic.50 2. Responding to Negative Economic Impacts Impacts on Households and Individuals. The public health emergency, including the necessary measures taken to protect public health, resulted in significant economic and financial hardship for many Americans. As businesses closed, consumers stayed home, schools shifted to remote VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:28 May 14, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\17MYR2.SGM 17MYR2 59 26792 Federal Register /Vol. 86, No. 93/Monday, May 17, 2021/Rules and Regulations 51U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, All Employees, Total Nonfarm (PAYEMS), retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; https:// fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PAYEMS (last visited May 8, 2021). 52Id. 53U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Civilian Labor Force Level [CLF16OV], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, https:// fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CLF16OV (last visited May 8, 2021). 54U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey: Employment status of the civilian population by sex and age (May 8 2021), https://www.bls.gov/ news.release/empsit.t01.htm (last visited May 8, 2021); U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey: Employment status of the civilian noninstitutional population by race, Hispanic or Latino ethnicity, sex, and age (May 8, 2021), https://www.bls.gov/ web/empsit/cpseea04.htm (last visited May 8, 2021); U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey: Employment status of the civilian noninstitutional population 25 years and over by educational attainment (May 8, 2021), https://www.bls.gov/web/ empsit/cpseea05.htm (last visited May 8, 2021). 55Elise Gould & Jori Kandra, Wages grew in 2020 because the bottom fell out of the low-wage labor market, Economic Policy Institute (Feb. 24, 2021), https://files.epi.org/pdf/219418.pdf. See also, Michael Dalton et al., The K-Shaped Recovery: Examining the Diverging Fortunes of Workers in the Recovery from the COVID–19 Pandemic using Business and Household Survey Microdata, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Working Paper Series (Feb. 2021), https://www.bls.gov/osmr/research- papers/2021/pdf/ec210020.pdf. 56Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Tracking the COVID–19 Recession’s Effects on Food, Housing, and Employment Hardships, https://www.cbpp.org/research/poverty-and- inequality/tracking-the-covid-19-recessions-effects- on-food-housing-and (last visited May 8, 2021). 57Women have carried a larger share of childcare responsibilities than men during the COVID–19 crisis. See, e.g., Gema Zamarro & Marı´a J. Prados, Gender differences in couples’ division of childcare, work and mental health during COVID– 19, Rev. Econ. Household 19:11–40 (2021), available at https://link.springer.com/article/ 10.1007/s11150-020-09534-7; Titan Alon et al., The Impact of COVID–19 on Gender Equality, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 26947 (April 2020), available at https://www.nber.org/ papers/w26947. 58U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Labor Force Participation Rate—20 Yrs. & Over, Black or African American Women [LNS11300032], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; https:// fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNS11300032 (last visited May 8, 2021). 59U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Labor Force Participation Rate—20 Yrs. & Over, Black or African American Men [LNS11300031], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; https:// fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNS11300031 (last visited May 8, 2021). 60U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Labor Force Participation Rate—20 Yrs. & Over, White Women [LNS11300029], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; https:// fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNS11300029 (last visited May 8, 2021). 61See, e.g., Michael Greenstone & Adam Looney, Unemployment and Earnings Losses: A Look at Long-Term Impacts of the Great Recession on American Workers, Brookings Institution (Nov. 4, 2021), https://www.brookings.edu/blog/jobs/2011/ 11/04/unemployment-and-earnings-losses-a-look- at-long-term-impacts-of-the-great-recession-on- american-workers/. 62Chi Chi Wu, Solving the Credit Conundrum: Helping Consumers’ Credit Records Impaired by the Foreclosure Crisis and Great Recession (Dec. 2013), https://www.nclc.org/images/pdf/credit_reports/ report-credit-conundrum-2013.pdf. 63Irwin Garfinkel, Sara McLanahan, Christopher Wimer, eds., Children of the Great Recession, Russell Sage Foundation (Aug. 2016), available at https://www.russellsage.org/publications/children- great-recession. 64Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, supra note 5. 65U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy, Small Businesses Generate 44 Percent of U.S. Economic Activity (Jan. 30, 2019), https:// advocacy.sba.gov/2019/01/30/small-businesses- generate-44-percent-of-u-s-economic-activity/. 66Biden, supra note 6. 67Daniel Wilmoth, U.S. Small Business Administration Office of Advocacy, The Effects of the COVID–19 Pandemic on Small Businesses, Issue Brief No. 16 (Mar. 2021), available at https:// cdn.advocacy.sba.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/ 03/02112318/COVID-19-Impact-On-Small- Business.pdf. 68U.S. Census Bureau, Small Business Pulse Survey, https://portal.census.gov/pulse/data/ (last visited May 8, 2021). 69Olivia S. Kim et al., Revenue Collapses and the Consumption of Small Business Owners in the Early Stages of the COVID–19 Pandemic (Nov. 2020), https://www.nber.org/papers/w28151. 70See e.g., Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Report to Congress on the Availability of Credit to Small Businesses (Sept. 2017), available at https://www.federalreserve.gov/ publications/2017-september-availability-of-credit- to-small-businesses.htm. 71Alexander W. Bartik et al., The Impact of COVID–19 on small business outcomes and expectations, PNAS 117(30): 17656–66 (July 28, 2020), available at https://www.pnas.org/content/ 117/30/17656. education, and travel declined precipitously, over 20 million jobs were lost in March and April 2020.51 Although many have returned to work, as of April 2021, the economy remains 8.2 million jobs below its pre-pandemic peak,52 and more than 3 million workers have dropped out of the labor market altogether relative to February 2020.53 Rates of unemployment are particularly severe among workers of color and workers with lower levels of educational attainment; for example, the overall unemployment rate in the United States was 6.1 percent in April 2021, but certain groups saw much higher rates: 9.7 percent for Black workers, 7.9 percent for Hispanic or Latino workers, and 9.3 percent for workers without a high school diploma.54 Job losses have also been particularly steep among low wage workers, with these workers remaining furthest from recovery as of the end of 2020.55 A severe recession—and its concentrated impact among low-income workers—has amplified food and housing insecurity, with an estimated nearly 17 million adults living in households where there is sometimes or often not enough food to eat and an estimated 10.7 million adults living in households that were not current on rent.56 Over the course of the pandemic, inequities also manifested along gender lines, as schools closed to in-person activities, leaving many working families without child care during the day.57 Women of color have been hit especially hard: The labor force participation rate for Black women has fallen by 3.2 percentage points58 during the pandemic as compared to 1.0 percentage points for Black men 59 and 2.0 percentage points for White women.60 As the economy recovers, the effects of the pandemic-related recession may continue to impact households, including a risk of longer-term effects on earnings and economic potential. For example, unemployed workers, especially those who have experienced longer periods of unemployment, earn lower wages over the long term once rehired.61 In addition to the labor market consequences for unemployed workers, recessions can also cause longer-term economic challenges through, among other factors, damaged consumer credit scores 62 and reduced familial and childhood wellbeing.63 These potential long-term economic consequences underscore the continued need for robust policy support. Impacts on Businesses. The pandemic has also severely impacted many businesses, with small businesses hit especially hard. Small businesses make up nearly half of U.S. private-sector employment64 and play a key role in supporting the overall economic recovery as they are responsible for two- thirds of net new jobs.65 Since the beginning of the pandemic, however, 400,000 small businesses have closed, with many more at risk.66 Sectors with a large share of small business employment have been among those with the most drastic drops in employment.67 The negative outlook for small businesses has continued: As of April 2021, approximately 70 percent of small businesses reported that the pandemic has had a moderate or large negative effect on their business, and over a third expect that it will take over 6 months for their business to return to their normal level of operations.68 This negative outlook is likely the result of many small businesses having faced periods of closure and having seen declining revenues as customers stayed home.69 In general, small businesses can face greater hurdles in accessing credit,70 and many small businesses were already financially fragile at the outset of the pandemic.71 Non-profits, which provide vital services to communities, have similarly faced VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:28 May 14, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\17MYR2.SGM 17MYR2 60 26793 Federal Register /Vol. 86, No. 93/Monday, May 17, 2021/Rules and Regulations 72Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, Impacts of COVID–19 on Nonprofits in the Western United States (May 2020), https://www.frbsf.org/ community-development/files/impact-of-covid- nonprofits-serving-western-united-states.pdf. 73Bureau of Labor Statistics, supra note 8; Elijah Moreno & Heather Sobrepena, Tribal entities remain resilient as COVID–19 batters their finances, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Nov. 10, 2021), https://www.minneapolisfed.org/article/ 2020/tribal-entities-remain-resilient-as-covid-19- batters-their-finances. 74Kim Parker et al., Economic Fallout from COVID–19 Continues to Hit Lower-Income Americans the Hardest, Pew Research Center (Sept. 24, 2020), https://www.pewresearch.org/social- trends/2020/09/24/economic-fallout-from-covid-19- continues-to-hit-lower-income-americans-the- hardest/; Gould, supra note 55. 75See infra Section II.B of this Supplementary Information. 76Elizabeth Kneebone, The Changing geography of US poverty, Brookings Institution (Feb. 15, 2017), https://www.brookings.edu/testimonies/the- changing-geography-of-us-poverty/. 77Elizabeth Kneebone & Natalie Holmes, U.S. concentrated poverty in the wake of the Great Recession, Brookings Institution (Mar. 31, 2016), https://www.brookings.edu/research/u-s- concentrated-poverty-in-the-wake-of-the-great- recession/. 78David Erickson et al., The Enduring Challenge of Concentrated Poverty in America: Case Studies from Communities Across the U.S. (2008), available at https://www.frbsf.org/community-development/ files/cp_fullreport.pdf. 79Educational quality, as early as Kindergarten, has a long-term impact on children’s public health and economic outcomes. See, e.g., Tyler W. Watts et al., The Chicago School Readiness Project: Examining the long-term impacts of an early childhood intervention, PLoS ONE 13(7) (2018), available at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0200144; Opportunity Insights, How Can We Amplify Education as an Engine of Mobility? Using big data to help children get the most from school, https:// opportunityinsights.org/education/ (last visited Apr. 26, 2021); U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Early Childhood Development and Education, https:// www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/ topic/social-determinants-health/interventions- resources/early-childhood-development-and- education (last visited Apr. 26, 2021). 80See, e.g., Bacher-Hicks, supra note 14. 81A Department of Education survey found that, as of February 2021, 42 percent of fourth grade students nationwide were offered only remote education, compared to 48 percent of economically disadvantaged students, 54 percent of Black students and 57 percent of Hispanic students. Large districts often disproportionately serve low-income students. See Institute of Education Sciences, Monthly School Survey Dashboard, https:// ies.ed.gov/schoolsurvey/ (last visited Apr. 26, 2021). In summer 2020, a review found that 74 percent of the largest 100 districts chose remote learning only. See Education Week, School Districts’ Reopening Plans: A Snapshot (Jul. 15, 2020), https:// www.edweek.org/leadership/school-districts- reopening-plans-a-snapshot/2020/07 (last visited May 4, 2021). 82HHS, supra note 79. 83Hirokazu Yoshikawa, Effects of the Global Coronavirus Disease—2019 Pandemic on Early Childhood Development: Short- and Long-Term Risks and Mitigating Program and Policy Actions, J. of Pediatrics Vol. 223:188–93 (Aug. 1, 2020), available at https://www.jpeds.com/article/S0022- 3476(20)30606-5/abstract. 84Based on calculations conducted by the Minneapolis Fed’s Center for Indian Country Development using Flood et al. (2020)’s Current Population Survey.’’ Sarah Flood, Miriam King, Renae Rodgers, Steven Ruggles and J. Robert Warren. Integrated Public Use Microdata Series, Current Population Survey: Version 8.0 [dataset]. Minneapolis, MN: IPUMS, 2020. https://doi.org/ 10.18128/D030.V8.0; see also Donna Feir & Charles Golding, Native Employment During COVID–19: Hard hit in April but Starting to Rebount? (Aug. 5, 2020), https://www.minneapolisfed.org/article/ 2020/native-employment-during-covid-19-hit-hard- in-april-but-starting-to-rebound. 85Moreno & Sobrepena, supra note 73. economic and financial challenges due to the pandemic.72 Impacts to State, Local, and Tribal Governments. State, local, and Tribal governments have felt substantial fiscal pressures. As noted above, State, local, and Tribal governments have faced significant revenue shortfalls and remain over 1 million jobs below their pre-pandemic staffing levels.73 These reductions in staffing may undermine the ability to deliver services effectively, as well as add to the number of unemployed individuals in their jurisdictions. Exacerbation of Pre-existing Disparities. The COVID–19 public health emergency may have lasting negative effects on economic outcomes, particularly in exacerbating disparities that existed prior to the pandemic. The negative economic impacts of the COVID–19 pandemic are particularly pronounced in certain communities and families. Low- and moderate-income jobs make up a substantial portion of both total pandemic job losses,74 and jobs that require in-person frontline work, which are exposed to greater risk of contracting COVID–19.75 Both factors compound pre-existing vulnerabilities and the likelihood of food, housing, or other financial insecurity in low- and moderate-income families and, given the concentration of low- and moderate- income families within certain communities,76 raise a substantial risk that the effects of the COVID–19 public health emergency will be amplified within these communities. These compounding effect of recessions on concentrated poverty and the long-lasting nature of this effect were observed after the 2007–2009 recession, including a large increase in concentrated poverty with the number of people living in extremely poor neighborhoods more than doubling by 2010–2014 relative to 2000.77 Concentrated poverty has a range of deleterious impacts, including additional burdens on families and reduced economic potential and social cohesion.78 Given the disproportionate impact of COVID–19 on low-income households discussed above, there is a risk that the current pandemic-induced recession could further increase concentrated poverty and cause long- term damage to economic prospects in neighborhoods of concentrated poverty. The negative economic impacts of COVID–19 also include significant impacts to children in disproportionately affected families and include impacts to education, health, and welfare, all of which contribute to long-term economic outcomes.79 Many low-income and minority students, who were disproportionately served by remote or hybrid education during the pandemic, lacked the resources to participate fully in remote schooling or live in households without adults available throughout the day to assist with online coursework.80 Given these trends, the pandemic may widen educational disparities and worsen outcomes for low-income students,81 an effect that would substantially impact their long-term economic outcomes. Increased economic strain or material hardship due to the pandemic could also have a long-term impact on health, educational, and economic outcomes of young children.82 Evidence suggests that adverse conditions in early childhood, including exposure to poverty, food insecurity, housing insecurity, or other economic hardships, are particularly impactful.83 The pandemic’s disproportionate economic impacts are also seen in Tribal communities across the country—for Tribal governments as well as families and businesses on and off Tribal lands. In the early months of the pandemic, Native American unemployment spiked to 26 percent and, while partially recovered, remains at nearly 11 percent.84 Tribal enterprises are a significant source of revenue for Tribal governments to support the provision of government services. These enterprises, notably concentrated in gaming, tourism, and hospitality, frequently closed, significantly reducing both revenues to Tribal governments and employment. As a result, Tribal governments have reduced essential services to their citizens and communities.85 Eligible Uses. Sections 602(c)(1)(A) and 603(c)(1)(A) permit use of payments from the Fiscal Recovery Funds to respond to the negative economic impacts of the COVID–19 public health emergency. Eligible uses that respond to the negative economic impacts of the public health emergency must be designed to address an economic harm resulting from or exacerbated by the public health emergency. In considering whether a program or service would be VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:28 May 14, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\17MYR2.SGM 17MYR2 61 26794 Federal Register /Vol. 86, No. 93/Monday, May 17, 2021/Rules and Regulations 86In some cases, a use may be permissible under another eligible use category even if it falls outside the scope of section (c)(1)(A) of the Act. eligible under this category, the recipient should assess whether, and the extent to which, there has been an economic harm, such as loss of earnings or revenue, that resulted from the COVID–19 public health emergency and whether, and the extent to which, the use would respond or address this harm.86 A recipient should first consider whether an economic harm exists and whether this harm was caused or made worse by the COVID–19 public health emergency. While economic impacts may either be immediate or delayed, assistance or aid to individuals or businesses that did not experience a negative economic impact from the public health emergency would not be an eligible use under this category. In addition, the eligible use must ‘‘respond to’’ the identified negative economic impact. Responses must be related and reasonably proportional to the extent and type of harm experienced; uses that bear no relation or are grossly disproportionate to the type or extent of harm experienced would not be eligible uses. Where there has been a negative economic impact resulting from the public health emergency, States, local, and Tribal governments have broad latitude to choose whether and how to use the Fiscal Recovery Funds to respond to and address the negative economic impact. Sections 602(c)(1)(A) and 603(c)(1)(A) describe several types of uses that would be eligible under this category, including assistance to households, small businesses, and nonprofits and aid to impacted industries such as tourism, travel, and hospitality. To facilitate implementation and use of payments from the Fiscal Recovery Funds, the interim final rule identifies a non-exclusive list of eligible uses of funding that respond to the negative economic impacts of the public health emergency. Consistent with the discussion above, the eligible uses listed below would respond directly to the economic or financial harms resulting from and or exacerbated by the public health emergency. •Assistance to Unemployed Workers. This includes assistance to unemployed workers, including services like job training to accelerate rehiring of unemployed workers; these services may extend to workers unemployed due to the pandemic or the resulting recession, or who were already unemployed when the pandemic began and remain so due to the negative economic impacts of the pandemic. •State Unemployment Insurance Trust Funds. Consistent with the approach taken in the CRF, recipients may make deposits into the state account of the Unemployment Trust Fund established under section 904 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1104) up to the level needed to restore the pre- pandemic balances of such account as of January 27, 2020 or to pay back advances received under Title XII of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1321) for the payment of benefits between January 27, 2020 and May 17, 2021, given the close nexus between Unemployment Trust Fund costs, solvency of Unemployment Trust Fund systems, and pandemic economic impacts. Further, Unemployment Trust Fund deposits can decrease fiscal strain on Unemployment Insurance systems impacted by the pandemic. States facing a sharp increase in Unemployment Insurance claims during the pandemic may have drawn down positive Unemployment Trust Fund balances and, after exhausting the balance, required advances to fund continuing obligations to claimants. Because both of these impacts were driven directly by the need for assistance to unemployed workers during the pandemic, replenishing Unemployment Trust Funds up to the pre-pandemic level responds to the pandemic’s negative economic impacts on unemployed workers. •Assistance to Households. Assistance to households or populations facing negative economic impacts due to COVID–19 is also an eligible use. This includes: Food assistance; rent, mortgage, or utility assistance; counseling and legal aid to prevent eviction or homelessness; cash assistance (discussed below); emergency assistance for burials, home repairs, weatherization, or other needs; internet access or digital literacy assistance; or job training to address negative economic or public health impacts experienced due to a worker’s occupation or level of training. As discussed above, in considering whether a potential use is eligible under this category, a recipient must consider whether, and the extent to which, the household has experienced a negative economic impact from the pandemic. In assessing whether a household or population experienced economic harm as a result of the pandemic, a recipient may presume that a household or population that experienced unemployment or increased food or housing insecurity or is low- or moderate-income experienced negative economic impacts resulting from the pandemic. For example, a cash transfer program may focus on unemployed workers or low- and moderate-income families, which have faced disproportionate economic harms due to the pandemic. Cash transfers must be reasonably proportional to the negative economic impact they are intended to address. Cash transfers grossly in excess of the amount needed to address the negative economic impact identified by the recipient would not be considered to be a response to the COVID–19 public health emergency or its negative impacts. In particular, when considering the appropriate size of permissible cash transfers made in response to the COVID–19 public health emergency, State, local and Tribal governments may consider and take guidance from the per person amounts previously provided by the Federal Government in response to the COVID–19 crisis. Cash transfers that are grossly in excess of such amounts would be outside the scope of eligible uses under sections 602(c)(1)(A) and 603(c)(1)(A) and could be subject to recoupment. In addition, a recipient could provide survivor’s benefits to surviving family members of COVID–19 victims, or cash assistance to widows, widowers, and dependents of eligible COVID–19 victims. •Expenses to Improve Efficacy of Economic Relief Programs. State, local, and Tribal governments may use payments from the Fiscal Recovery Funds to improve efficacy of programs addressing negative economic impacts, including through use of data analysis, targeted consumer outreach, improvements to data or technology infrastructure, and impact evaluations. •Small Businesses and Non-profits. As discussed above, small businesses and non-profits faced significant challenges in covering payroll, mortgages or rent, and other operating costs as a result of the public health emergency and measures taken to contain the spread of the virus. State, local, and Tribal governments may provide assistance to small businesses to adopt safer operating procedures, weather periods of closure, or mitigate financial hardship resulting from the COVID–19 public health emergency, including: Æ Loans or grants to mitigate financial hardship such as declines in revenues or impacts of periods of business closure, for example by supporting payroll and benefits costs, costs to retain employees, mortgage, rent, or utilities costs, and other operating costs; Æ Loans, grants, or in-kind assistance to implement COVID–19 prevention or mitigation tactics, such as physical VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:28 May 14, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\17MYR2.SGM 17MYR2 62 26795 Federal Register /Vol. 86, No. 93/Monday, May 17, 2021/Rules and Regulations 87See Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, An Uphill Battle: COVID–19’s Outsized Toll on Minority-Owned Firms (Oct. 8, 2020), https:// www.clevelandfed.org/newsroom-and-events/ publications/community-development-briefs/db- 20201008-misera-report.aspx (discussing the impact of COVID–19 on minority owned businesses). 88U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, All Employees, State Government [CES9092000001] and All Employees, Local Government [CES9093000001], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/ CES9092000001 and https://fred.stlouisfed.org/ series/CES9093000001 (last visited May 8, 2021). 89From February 2020 to April 2021, employment in ‘‘Leisure and hospitality’’ has fallen by approximately 17 percent. See U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, All Employees, Leisure and Hospitality, retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/ USLAH (last visited May 8, 2021). From 2019Q4 to 2020Q4, gross output (e.g. revenue) in arts, entertainment, recreation, accommodation, and food services has fallen by approximately 24 percent. See Bureau of Economic Analysis, News Release: Gross Domestic Product (Third Estimate), Corporate Profits, and GDP by Industry, Fourth Quarter and Year 2020 (Mar. 25, 2021), Table 17, https://www.bea.gov/sites/default/files/2021-03/ gdp4q20_3rd.pdf. 90HUD, supra note 48. 91Stuart M. Butler & Jonathan Grabinsky, Tackling the legacy of persistent urban inequality and concentrated poverty, Brookings Institution (Nov. 16, 2020), https://www.brookings.edu/blog/ up-front/2020/11/16/tackling-the-legacy-of- Continued plant changes to enable social distancing, enhanced cleaning efforts, barriers or partitions, or COVID–19 vaccination, testing, or contact tracing programs; and Æ Technical assistance, counseling, or other services to assist with business planning needs. As discussed above, these services should respond to the negative economic impacts of COVID–19. Recipients may consider additional criteria to target assistance to businesses in need, including small businesses. Such criteria may include businesses facing financial insecurity, substantial declines in gross receipts (e.g., comparable to measures used to assess eligibility for the Paycheck Protection Program), or other economic harm due to the pandemic, as well as businesses with less capacity to weather financial hardship, such as the smallest businesses, those with less access to credit, or those serving disadvantaged communities. Recipients should consider local economic conditions and business data when establishing such criteria.87 •Rehiring State, Local, and Tribal Government Staff. State, local, and Tribal governments continue to see pandemic impacts in overall staffing levels: State, local, and Tribal government employment remains more than 1 million jobs lower in April 2021 than prior to the pandemic.88 Employment losses decrease a state or local government’s ability to effectively administer services. Thus, the interim final rule includes as an eligible use payroll, covered benefits, and other costs associated with rehiring public sector staff, up to the pre-pandemic staffing level of the government. •Aid to Impacted Industries. Sections 602(c)(1)(A) and 603(c)(1)(A) recognize that certain industries, such as tourism, travel, and hospitality, were disproportionately and negatively impacted by the COVID–19 public health emergency. Aid provided to tourism, travel, and hospitality industries should respond to the negative economic impacts of the pandemic on those and similarly impacted industries. For example, aid may include assistance to implement COVID–19 mitigation and infection prevention measures to enable safe resumption of tourism, travel, and hospitality services, for example, improvements to ventilation, physical barriers or partitions, signage to facilitate social distancing, provision of masks or personal protective equipment, or consultation with infection prevention professionals to develop safe reopening plans. Aid may be considered responsive to the negative economic impacts of the pandemic if it supports businesses, attractions, business districts, and Tribal development districts operating prior to the pandemic and affected by required closures and other efforts to contain the pandemic. For example, a recipient may provide aid to support safe reopening of businesses in the tourism, travel, and hospitality industries and to business districts that were closed during the COVID–19 public health emergency, as well as aid for a planned expansion or upgrade of tourism, travel, and hospitality facilities delayed due to the pandemic. When considering providing aid to industries other than tourism, travel, and hospitality, recipients should consider the extent of the economic impact as compared to tourism, travel, and hospitality, the industries enumerated in the statute. For example, on net, the leisure and hospitality industry has experienced an approximately 24 percent decline in revenue and approximately 17 percent decline in employment nationwide due to the COVID–19 public health emergency.89 Recipients should also consider whether impacts were due to the COVID–19 pandemic, as opposed to longer-term economic or industrial trends unrelated to the pandemic. To facilitate transparency and accountability, the interim final rule requires that State, local, and Tribal governments publicly report assistance provided to private-sector businesses under this eligible use, including tourism, travel, hospitality, and other impacted industries, and its connection to negative economic impacts of the pandemic. Recipients also should maintain records to support their assessment of how businesses or business districts receiving assistance were affected by the negative economic impacts of the pandemic and how the aid provided responds to these impacts. As discussed above, economic disparities that existed prior to the COVID–19 public health emergency amplified the impact of the pandemic among low-income and minority groups. These families were more likely to face housing, food, and financial insecurity; are over-represented among low-wage workers; and many have seen their livelihoods deteriorate further during the pandemic and economic contraction. In recognition of the disproportionate negative economic impacts on certain communities and populations, the interim final rule identifies services and programs that will be presumed to be responding to the negative economic impacts of the COVID–19 public health emergency when provided in these communities. Specifically, Treasury will presume that certain types of services, outlined below, are eligible uses when provided in a QCT, to families and individuals living in QCTs, or when these services are provided by Tribal governments.90 Recipients may also provide these services to other populations, households, or geographic areas disproportionately impacted by the pandemic. In identifying these disproportionately impacted communities, recipients should be able to support their determination that the pandemic resulted in disproportionate public health or economic outcomes to the specific populations, households, or geographic areas to be served. The interim final rule identifies a non- exclusive list of uses that address the disproportionate negative economic effects of the COVID–19 public health emergency, including: Æ Building Stronger Communities through Investments in Housing and Neighborhoods. The economic impacts of COVID–19 have likely been most acute in lower-income neighborhoods, including concentrated areas of high unemployment, limited economic opportunity, and housing insecurity.91 VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:28 May 14, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\17MYR2.SGM 17MYR2 63 26796 Federal Register /Vol. 86, No. 93/Monday, May 17, 2021/Rules and Regulations persistent-urban-inequality-and-concentrated- poverty/. 92U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Quality of Housing, https:// www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/ topic/social-determinants-health/interventions- resources/quality-of-housing#11 (last visited Apr. 26, 2021). 93The Opportunity Atlas, https:// www.opportunityatlas.org/ (last visited Apr. 26, 2021); Raj Chetty & Nathaniel Hendren, The Impacts of Neighborhoods on Intergenerational Mobility I: Childhood Exposure Effects, Quarterly J. of Econ. 133(3):1107–162 (2018), available at https://opportunityinsights.org/paper/ neighborhoodsi/. 94See supra notes 52 and 84. Services in this category alleviate the immediate economic impacts of the COVID–19 pandemic on housing insecurity, while addressing conditions that contributed to poor public health and economic outcomes during the pandemic, namely concentrated areas with limited economic opportunity and inadequate or poor-quality housing.92 Eligible services include: D Services to address homelessness such as supportive housing, and to improve access to stable, affordable housing among unhoused individuals; D Affordable housing development to increase supply of affordable and high- quality living units; and D Housing vouchers, residential counseling, or housing navigation assistance to facilitate household moves to neighborhoods with high levels of economic opportunity and mobility for low-income residents, to help residents increase their economic opportunity and reduce concentrated areas of low economic opportunity.93 Æ Addressing Educational Disparities. As outlined above, school closures and the transition to remote education raised particular challenges for lower-income students, potentially exacerbating educational disparities, while increases in economic hardship among families could have long-lasting impacts on children’s educational and economic prospects. Services under this prong would enhance educational supports to help mitigate impacts of the pandemic. Eligible services include: D New, expanded, or enhanced early learning services, including pre- kindergarten, Head Start, or partnerships between pre-kindergarten programs and local education authorities, or administration of those services; D Providing assistance to high-poverty school districts to advance equitable funding across districts and geographies; D Evidence-based educational services and practices to address the academic needs of students, including tutoring, summer, afterschool, and other extended learning and enrichment programs; and D Evidence-based practices to address the social, emotional, and mental health needs of students; Æ Promoting Healthy Childhood Environments. Children’s economic and family circumstances have a long-term impact on their future economic outcomes.94 Increases in economic hardship, material insecurity, and parental stress and behavioral health challenges all raise the risk of long-term harms to today’s children due to the pandemic. Eligible services to address this challenge include: D New or expanded high-quality childcare to provide safe and supportive care for children; D Home visiting programs to provide structured visits from health, parent educators, and social service professionals to pregnant women or families with young children to offer education and assistance navigating resources for economic support, health needs, or child development; and D Enhanced services for child welfare- involved families and foster youth to provide support and training on child development, positive parenting, coping skills, or recovery for mental health and substance use challenges. State, local, and Tribal governments are encouraged to use payments from the Fiscal Recovery Funds to respond to the direct and immediate needs of the pandemic and its negative economic impacts and, in particular, the needs of households and businesses that were disproportionately and negatively impacted by the public health emergency. As highlighted above, low- income communities and workers and people of color have faced more severe health and economic outcomes during the pandemic, with pre-existing social vulnerabilities like low-wage or insecure employment, concentrated neighborhoods with less economic opportunity, and pre-existing health disparities likely contributing to the magnified impact of the pandemic. The Fiscal Recovery Funds provide resources to not only respond to the immediate harms of the pandemic but also to mitigate its longer-term impact in compounding the systemic public health and economic challenges of disproportionately impacted populations. Treasury encourages recipients to consider funding uses that foster a strong, inclusive, and equitable recovery, especially uses with long-term benefits for health and economic outcomes. Uses Outside the Scope of this Category. Certain uses would not be within the scope of this eligible use category, although may be eligible under other eligible use categories. A general infrastructure project, for example, typically would not be included unless the project responded to a specific pandemic public health need (e.g., investments in facilities for the delivery of vaccines) or a specific negative economic impact like those described above (e.g., affordable housing in a QCT). The ARPA explicitly includes infrastructure if it is ‘‘necessary’’ and in water, sewer, or broadband. See Section II.D of this SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. State, local, and Tribal governments also may use the Fiscal Recovery Funds under sections 602(c)(1)(C) or 603(c)(1)(C) to provide ‘‘government services’’ broadly to the extent of their reduction in revenue. See Section II.C of this SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. This category of eligible uses also would not include contributions to rainy day funds, financial reserves, or similar funds. Resources made available under this eligible use category are intended to help meet pandemic response needs and provide relief for households and businesses facing near- and long-term negative economic impacts. Contributions to rainy day funds and similar financial reserves would not address these needs or respond to the COVID–19 public health emergency but would rather constitute savings for future spending needs. Similarly, this eligible use category would not include payment of interest or principal on outstanding debt instruments, including, for example, short-term revenue or tax anticipation notes, or other debt service costs. As discussed below, payments from the Fiscal Recovery Funds are intended to be used prospectively and the interim final rule precludes use of these funds to cover the costs of debt incurred prior to March 3, 2021. Fees or issuance costs associated with the issuance of new debt would also not be covered using payments from the Fiscal Recovery Funds because such costs would not themselves have been incurred to address the needs of pandemic response or its negative economic impacts. The purpose of the Fiscal Recovery Funds is to provide fiscal relief that will permit State, local, and Tribal governments to continue to respond to the COVID–19 public health emergency. For the same reasons, this category of eligible uses would not include satisfaction of any obligation arising under or pursuant to a settlement agreement, judgment, consent decree, or judicially confirmed debt restructuring VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:28 May 14, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\17MYR2.SGM 17MYR2 64 26797 Federal Register /Vol. 86, No. 93/Monday, May 17, 2021/Rules and Regulations 95Sections 602(c)(1)(B), 603(c)(1)(B) of the Act. 96See, e.g., Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, COVID Data Tracker: Cases & Death among Healthcare Personnel, https://covid.cdc.gov/ covid-data-tracker/#health-care-personnel (last visited May 4, 2021); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, COVID Data Tracker: Confirmed COVID–19 Cases and Deaths among Staff and Rate per 1,000 Resident-Weeks in Nursing Homes, by Week—United States, https://covid.cdc.gov/covid- data-tracker/#nursing-home-staff (last visited May 4, 2021). 97See, e.g., The Lancet, The plight of essential workers during the COVID–19 pandemic, Vol. 395, Issue 10237:1587 (May 23, 2020), available at https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/ PIIS0140-6736%2820%2931200-9/fulltext. 98Id. 99Joanna Gaitens et al., Covid–19 and essential workers: A narrative review of health outcomes and moral injury, Int’l J. of Envtl. Research and Pub. Health 18(4):1446 (Feb. 4, 2021), available at https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33557075/; Tiana N. Rogers et al., Racial Disparities in COVID–19 Mortality Among Essential Workers in the United States, World Med. & Health policy 12(3):311–27 (Aug. 5, 2020), available at https:// onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/wmh3.358 (finding that vulnerability to coronavirus exposure was increased among non-Hispanic blacks, who disproportionately occupied the top nine essential occupations). 100Economic Policy Institute, Only 30% of those working outside their home are receiving hazard pay (June 16, 2020), https://www.epi.org/press/only- 30-of-those-working-outside-their-home-are- receiving-hazard-pay-black-and-hispanic-workers- are-most-concerned-about-bringing-the- coronavirus-home/. plan in a judicial, administrative, or regulatory proceeding, except to the extent the judgment or settlement requires the provision of services that would respond to the COVID–19 public health emergency. That is, satisfaction of a settlement or judgment would not itself respond to COVID–19 with respect to the public health emergency or its negative economic impacts, unless the settlement requires the provision of services or aid that did directly respond to these needs, as described above. In addition, as described in Section V.III of this SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, Treasury will establish reporting and record keeping requirements for uses within this category, including enhanced reporting requirements for certain types of uses. Question 1: Are there other types of services or costs that Treasury should consider as eligible uses to respond to the public health impacts of COVID–19? Describe how these respond to the COVID–19 public health emergency. Question 2: The interim final rule permits coverage of payroll and benefits costs of public health and safety staff primarily dedicated to COVID–19 response, as well as rehiring of public sector staff up to pre-pandemic levels. For how long should these measures remain in place? What other measures or presumptions might Treasury consider to assess the extent to which public sector staff are engaged in COVID–19 response, and therefore reimbursable, in an easily-administrable manner? Question 3: The interim final rule permits rehiring of public sector staff up to the government’s pre-pandemic staffing level, which is measured based on employment as of January 27, 2020. Does this approach adequately measure the pre-pandemic staffing level in a manner that is both accurate and easily administrable? Why or why not? Question 4: The interim final rule permits deposits to Unemployment Insurance Trust Funds, or using funds to pay back advances, up to the pre- pandemic balance. What, if any, conditions should be considered to ensure that funds repair economic impacts of the pandemic and strengthen unemployment insurance systems? Question 5: Are there other types of services or costs that Treasury should consider as eligible uses to respond to the negative economic impacts of COVID–19? Describe how these respond to the COVID–19 public health emergency. Question 6: What other measures, presumptions, or considerations could be used to assess ‘‘impacted industries’’ affected by the COVID–19 public health emergency? Question 7: What are the advantages and disadvantages of using Qualified Census Tracts and services provided by Tribal governments to delineate where a broader range of eligible uses are presumed to be responsive to the public health and economic impacts of COVID–19? What other measures might Treasury consider? Are there other populations or geographic areas that were disproportionately impacted by the pandemic that should be explicitly included? Question 8: Are there other services or costs that Treasury should consider as eligible uses to respond to the disproportionate impacts of COVID–19 on low-income populations and communities? Describe how these respond to the COVID–19 public health emergency or its negative economic impacts, including its exacerbation of pre-existing challenges in these areas. Question 9: The interim final rule includes eligible uses to support affordable housing and stronger neighborhoods in disproportionately- impacted communities. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of explicitly including other uses to support affordable housing and stronger neighborhoods, including rehabilitation of blighted properties or demolition of abandoned or vacant properties. In what ways does, or does not, this potential use address public health or economic impacts of the pandemic? What considerations, if any, could support use of Fiscal Recovery Funds in ways that do not result in resident displacement or loss of affordable housing units? B. Premium Pay Fiscal Recovery Funds payments may be used by recipients to provide premium pay to eligible workers performing essential work during the COVID–19 public health emergency or to provide grants to third-party employers with eligible workers performing essential work.95 These are workers who have been and continue to be relied on to maintain continuity of operations of essential critical infrastructure sectors, including those who are critical to protecting the health and wellbeing of their communities. Since the start of the COVID–19 public health emergency in January 2020, essential workers have put their physical wellbeing at risk to meet the daily needs of their communities and to provide care for others. In the course of this work, many essential workers have contracted or died of COVID–19.96 Several examples reflect the severity of the health impacts for essential workers. Meat processing plants became ‘‘hotspots’’ for transmission, with 700 new cases reported at a single plant on a single day in May 2020.97 In New York City, 120 employees of the Metropolitan Transit Authority were estimated to have died due to COVID–19 by mid-May 2020, with nearly 4,000 testing positive for the virus.98 Furthermore, many essential workers are people of color or low-wage workers.99 These workers, in particular, have borne a disproportionate share of the health and economic impacts of the pandemic. Such workers include: •Staff at nursing homes, hospitals, and home care settings; •Workers at farms, food production facilities, grocery stores, and restaurants; •Janitors and sanitation workers; •Truck drivers, transit staff, and warehouse workers; •Public health and safety staff; •Childcare workers, educators, and other school staff; and •Social service and human services staff. During the public health emergency, employers’ policies on COVID–19- related hazard pay have varied widely, with many essential workers not yet compensated for the heightened risks they have faced and continue to face.100 VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:28 May 14, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\17MYR2.SGM 17MYR2 65 26798 Federal Register /Vol. 86, No. 93/Monday, May 17, 2021/Rules and Regulations 101McCormack, supra note 37. 102Id. 103Sections 602(g)(2), 603(g)(2) of the Act. 104The list of critical infrastructure sectors provided in the interim final rule is based on the list of essential workers under The Heroes Act, H.R. 6800, 116th Cong. (2020). 105County median annual wage is taken to be that of the metropolitan or nonmetropolitan area that includes the county. See U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, State Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates, https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/ oessrcst.htm (last visited May 1, 2021); U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, May 2020 Metropolitan and Nonmetropolitan Area Estimates listed by county or town, https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/county_ links.htm (last visited May 1, 2021). 106Treasury performed this analysis with data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2019 Annual Social and Economic Supplement. In determining which occupations to include in this analysis, Treasury excluded management and supervisory positions, as such positions may not necessarily involve regular in-person interactions or physical handling of items to the same extent as non-managerial positions. 107However, such compensation must be ‘‘in addition to’’ remuneration or wages already received. That is, employers may not reduce such workers’ current pay and use Fiscal Recovery Funds to compensate themselves for premium pay previously provided to the worker. Many of these workers earn lower wages on average and live in socioeconomically vulnerable communities as compared to the general population.101 A recent study found that 25 percent of essential workers were estimated to have low household income, with 13 percent in high-risk households.102 The low pay of many essential workers makes them less able to cope with the financial consequences of the pandemic or their work-related health risks, including working hours lost due to sickness or disruptions to childcare and other daily routines, or the likelihood of COVID–19 spread in their households or communities. Thus, the threats and costs involved with maintaining the ongoing operation of vital facilities and services have been, and continue to be, borne by those that are often the most vulnerable to the pandemic. The added health risk to essential workers is one prominent way in which the pandemic has amplified pre-existing socioeconomic inequities. The Fiscal Recovery Funds will help respond to the needs of essential workers by allowing recipients to remunerate essential workers for the elevated health risks they have faced and continue to face during the public health emergency. To ensure that premium pay is targeted to workers that faced or face heightened risks due to the character of their work, the interim final rule defines essential work as work involving regular in-person interactions or regular physical handling of items that were also handled by others. A worker would not be engaged in essential work and, accordingly may not receive premium pay, for telework performed from a residence. Sections 602(g)(2) and 603(g)(2) define eligible worker to mean ‘‘those workers needed to maintain continuity of operations of essential critical infrastructure sectors and additional sectors as each Governor of a State or territory, or each Tribal government, may designate as critical to protect the health and well-being of the residents of their State, territory, or Tribal government.’’103 The rule incorporates this definition and provides a list of industries recognized as essential critical infrastructure sectors.104 These sectors include healthcare, public health and safety, childcare, education, sanitation, transportation, and food production and services, among others as noted above. As provided under sections 602(g)(2) and 603(g)(2), the chief executive of each recipient has discretion to add additional sectors to this list, so long as additional sectors are deemed critical to protect the health and well-being of residents. In providing premium pay to essential workers or grants to eligible employers, a recipient must consider whether the pay or grant would ‘‘respond to’’ to the worker or workers performing essential work. Premium pay or grants provided under this section respond to workers performing essential work if it addresses the heightened risk to workers who must be physically present at a jobsite and, for many of whom, the costs associated with illness were hardest to bear financially. Many of the workers performing critical essential services are low- or moderate-income workers, such as those described above. The ARPA recognizes this by defining premium pay to mean an amount up to $13 per hour in addition to wages or remuneration the worker otherwise receives and in an aggregate amount not to exceed $25,000 per eligible worker. To ensure the provision is implemented in a manner that compensates these workers, the interim final rule provides that any premium pay or grants provided using the Fiscal Recovery Funds should prioritize compensation of those lower income eligible workers that perform essential work. As such, providing premium pay to eligible workers responds to such workers by helping address the disparity between the critical services and risks taken by essential workers and the relatively low compensation they tend to receive in exchange. If premium pay would increase a worker’s total pay above 150 percent of their residing state’s average annual wage for all occupations, as defined by the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, or their residing county’s average annual wage, as defined by the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, whichever is higher, on an annual basis, the State, local, or Tribal government must provide Treasury and make publicly available, whether for themselves or on behalf of a grantee, a written justification of how the premium pay or grant is responsive to workers performing essential worker during the public health emergency.105 The threshold of 150 percent for requiring additional written justification is based on an analysis of the distribution of labor income for a sample of 20 occupations that generally correspond to the essential workers as defined in the interim final rule.106 For these occupations, labor income for the vast majority of workers was under 150 percent of average annual labor income across all occupations. Treasury anticipates that the threshold of 150 percent of the annual average wage will be greater than the annual average wage of the vast majority of eligible workers performing essential work. These enhanced reporting requirements help to ensure grants are directed to essential workers in critical infrastructure sectors and responsive to the impacts of the pandemic observed among essential workers, namely the mis-alignment between health risks and compensation. Enhanced reporting also provides transparency to the public. Finally, using a localized measure reflects differences in wages and cost of living across the country, making this standard administrable and reflective of essential worker incomes across a diverse range of geographic areas. Furthermore, because premium pay is intended to compensate essential workers for heightened risk due to COVID–19, it must be entirely additive to a worker’s regular rate of wages and other remuneration and may not be used to reduce or substitute for a worker’s normal earnings. The definition of premium pay also clarifies that premium pay may be provided retrospectively for work performed at any time since the start of the COVID– 19 public health emergency, where those workers have yet to be compensated adequately for work previously performed.107 Treasury encourages recipients to prioritize providing retrospective premium pay where possible, recognizing that many essential workers have not yet received additional compensation for work conducted over the course of many VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:28 May 14, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\17MYR2.SGM 17MYR2 66 26799 Federal Register /Vol. 86, No. 93/Monday, May 17, 2021/Rules and Regulations 108ARPA, supra note 16. 109Major sources include personal income tax, corporate income tax, sales tax, and property tax. See Lucy Dadayan., States Reported Revenue Growth in July–September Quarter, Reflecting Revenue Shifts from the Prior Quarter, State Tax and Econ. Rev. (Q. 3, 2020), available at https:// www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/ 103938/state-tax-and-economic-review-2020-q3_ 0.pdf. 110National League of Cities, City Fiscal Conditions (2020), available at https://www.nlc.org/ wp-content/uploads/2020/08/City_Fiscal_ Conditions_2020_FINAL.pdf. 111Surveys conducted by the Center for Indian Country Development at the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis in March, April, and September 2020. See Moreno & Sobrepena, supra note 73. 112See, e.g., Fitzpatrick, Haughwout & Setren, Fiscal Drag from the State and Local Sector?, Liberty Street Economics Blog, Federal Reserve Bank of New York (June 27, 2012), https:// www.libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2012/ 06/fiscal-drag-from-the-state-and-local-sector.html; Jiri Jonas, Great Recession and Fiscal Squeeze at U.S. Subnational Government Level, IMF Working Paper 12/184, (July 2012), available at https:// www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2012/ wp12184.pdf; Gordon, supra note 9. 113State and local government general revenue from own sources, adjusted for inflation using the GDP price index. U.S. Census Bureau, Annual Survey of State Government Finances and U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, National Income and Product Accounts. 114U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, All Employees, State Government [CES9092000001] and All Employees, Local Government [CES9093000001], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/ CES9092000001 and https://fred.stlouisfed.org/ series/CES9093000001 (last visited Apr. 27, 2021). 115U.S. Census Bureau, Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, https:// www.census.gov/programs-surveys/gov- finances.html (last visited Apr. 30, 2021). 116The interim final rule would define tax revenue in a manner consistent with the Census Bureau’s definition of tax revenue, with certain changes (i.e., inclusion of revenue from liquor stores and certain intergovernmental transfers). Current charges are defined as ‘‘charges imposed for providing current services or for the sale of products in connection with general government activities.’’ It includes revenues such as public education institution, public hospital, and toll revenues. Miscellaneous general revenue comprises of all other general revenue of governments from their own sources (i.e., other than liquor store, utility, and insurance trust revenue), including rents, royalties, lottery proceeds, and fines. months. Essential workers who have already earned premium pay for essential work performed during the COVID–19 public health emergency remain eligible for additional payments, and an essential worker may receive both retrospective premium pay for prior work as well as prospective premium pay for current or ongoing work. To ensure any grants respond to the needs of essential workers and are made in a fair and transparent manner, the rule imposes some additional reporting requirements for grants to third-party employers, including the public disclosure of grants provided. See Section VIII of this SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, discussing reporting requirements. In responding to the needs of essential workers, a grant to an employer may provide premium pay to eligible workers performing essential work, as these terms are defined in the interim final rule and discussed above. A grant provided to an employer may also be for essential work performed by eligible workers pursuant to a contract. For example, if a municipality contracts with a third party to perform sanitation work, the third-party contractor could be eligible to receive a grant to provide premium pay for these eligible workers. Question 10: Are there additional sectors beyond those listed in the interim final rule that should be considered essential critical infrastructure sectors? Question 11: What, if any, additional criteria should Treasury consider to ensure that premium pay responds to essential workers? Question 12: What consideration, if any, should be given to the criteria on salary threshold, including measure and level, for requiring written justification? C. Revenue Loss Recipients may use payments from the Fiscal Recovery Funds for the provision of government services to the extent of the reduction in revenue experienced due to the COVID–19 public health emergency.108 Pursuant to sections 602(c)(1)(C) and 603(c)(1)(C) of the Act, a recipient’s reduction in revenue is measured relative to the revenue collected in the most recent full fiscal year prior to the emergency. Many State, local, and Tribal governments are experiencing significant budget shortfalls, which can have a devastating impact on communities. State government tax revenue from major sources were down 4.3 percent in the six months ended September 2020, relative to the same period 2019.109 At the local level, nearly 90 percent of cities have reported being less able to meet the fiscal needs of their communities and, on average, cities expect a double-digit decline in general fund revenues in their fiscal year 2021.110 Similarly, surveys of Tribal governments and Tribal enterprises found majorities of respondents reporting substantial cost increases and revenue decreases, with Tribal governments reporting reductions in healthcare, housing, social services, and economic development activities as a result of reduced revenues.111 These budget shortfalls are particularly problematic in the current environment, as State, local, and Tribal governments work to mitigate and contain the COVID–19 pandemic and help citizens weather the economic downturn. Further, State, local, and Tribal government budgets affect the broader economic recovery. During the period following the 2007–2009 recession, State and local government budget pressures led to fiscal austerity that was a significant drag on the overall economic recovery.112 Inflation- adjusted State and local government revenue did not return to the previous peak until 2013,113 while State, local, and Tribal government employment did not recover to its prior peak for over a decade, until August 2019—just a few months before the COVID–19 public health emergency began.114 Sections 602(c)(1)(C) and 603(c)(1)(C) of the Act allow recipients facing budget shortfalls to use payments from the Fiscal Recovery Funds to avoid cuts to government services and, thus, enable State, local, and Tribal governments to continue to provide valuable services and ensure that fiscal austerity measures do not hamper the broader economic recovery. The interim final rule implements these provisions by establishing a definition of ‘‘general revenue’’ for purposes of calculating a loss in revenue and by providing a methodology for calculating revenue lost due to the COVID–19 public health emergency. General Revenue. The interim final rule adopts a definition of ‘‘general revenue’’ based largely on the components reported under ‘‘General Revenue from Own Sources’’ in the Census Bureau’s Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, and for purposes of this interim final rule, helps to ensure that the components of general revenue would be calculated in a consistent manner.115 By relying on a methodology that is both familiar and comprehensive, this approach minimizes burden to recipients and provides consistency in the measurement of general revenue across a diverse set of recipients. The interim final rule defines the term ‘‘general revenue’’ to include revenues collected by a recipient and generated from its underlying economy and would capture a range of different types of tax revenues, as well as other types of revenue that are available to support government services.116 In calculating revenue, recipients should sum across all revenue streams covered as general revenue. This approach minimizes the administrative burden for recipients, provides for greater consistency across recipients, and presents a more accurate representation of the overall impact of VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:28 May 14, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\17MYR2.SGM 17MYR2 67 26800 Federal Register /Vol. 86, No. 93/Monday, May 17, 2021/Rules and Regulations 117Fund-oriented reporting, such as what is used under the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB), focuses on the types of uses and activities funded by the revenue, as opposed to the economic activity from which the revenue is sourced. See Governmental Accounting Standards Series, Statement No. 54 of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board: Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions, No. 287–B (Feb. 2009). 118Supra note 116. 119U.S. Census Bureau, Government Finance and Employment Classification Manual (Dec. 2000), https://www2.census.gov/govs/class/classfull.pdf. 120For example, in 2018, state transfers to localities accounted for approximately 27 percent of local revenues. U.S. Census Bureau, Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, Table 1 (2018), https://www.census.gov/data/datasets/2018/ econ/local/public-use-datasets.html. 121For example, following the 2007–09 recession, local government property tax collections did not begin to decline until 2011, suggesting that property tax collection declines can lag downturns. See U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, Personal current taxes: State and local: Property taxes [S210401A027NBEA], retrieved from Federal Reserve Economic Data, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=r3YI (last visited Apr. 22, 2021). Estimating the reduction in revenue at points throughout the covered period will allow for this type of lagged effect to be taken into account during the covered period. 122Together with revenue from liquor stores from 2015 to 2018. This estimate does not include any intergovernmental transfers. A recipient using the three-year average to calculate their growth adjustment must be based on the definition of general revenue, including treatment of intergovernmental transfers. 2015–2018 represents the most recent available data. See U.S. Census Bureau, State & Local Government Finance Historical Datasets and Tables (2018), https:// www.census.gov/programs-surveys/gov-finances/ data/datasets.html. the COVID–19 public health emergency on a recipient’s revenue, rather than relying on financial reporting prepared by each recipient, which vary in methodology used and which generally aggregates revenue by purpose rather than by source.117 Consistent with the Census Bureau’s definition of ‘‘general revenue from own sources,’’ the definition of general revenue in the interim final rule would exclude refunds and other correcting transactions, proceeds from issuance of debt or the sale of investments, and agency or private trust transactions. The definition of general revenue also would exclude revenue generated by utilities and insurance trusts. In this way, the definition of general revenue focuses on sources that are generated from economic activity and are available to fund government services, rather than a fund or administrative unit established to account for and control a particular activity.118 For example, public utilities typically require financial support from the State, local, or Tribal government, rather than providing revenue to such government, and any revenue that is generated by public utilities typically is used to support the public utility’s continued operation, rather than being used as a source of revenue to support government services generally. The definition of general revenue would include all revenue from Tribal enterprises, as this revenue is generated from economic activity and is available to fund government services. Tribes are not able to generate revenue through taxes in the same manner as State and local governments and, as a result, Tribal enterprises are critical sources of revenue for Tribal governments that enable Tribal governments to provide a range of services, including elder care, health clinics, wastewater management, and forestry. Finally, the term ‘‘general revenue’’ includes intergovernmental transfers between State and local governments, but excludes intergovernmental transfers from the Federal Government, including Federal transfers made via a State to a local government pursuant to the CRF or as part of the Fiscal Recovery Funds. States and local governments often share or collect revenue on behalf of one another, which results in intergovernmental transfers. When attributing revenue to a unit of government, the Census Bureau’s methodology considers which unit of government imposes, collects, and retains the revenue and assigns the revenue to the unit of government that meets at least two of those three factors.119 For purposes of measuring loss in general revenue due to the COVID–19 public health emergency and to better allow continued provision of government services, the retention and ability to use the revenue is a more critical factor. Accordingly, and to better measure the funds available for the provision of government services, the definition of general revenue would include intergovernmental transfers from States or local governments other than funds transferred pursuant to ARPA, CRF, or another Federal program. This formulation recognizes the importance of State transfers for local government revenue.120 Calculation of Loss. In general, recipients will compute the extent of the reduction in revenue by comparing actual revenue to a counterfactual trend representing what could have been expected to occur in the absence of the pandemic. This approach measures losses in revenue relative to the most recent fiscal year prior to the COVID–19 public health emergency by using the most recent pre-pandemic fiscal year as the starting point for estimates of revenue growth absent the pandemic. In other words, the counterfactual trend starts with the last full fiscal year prior to the COVID–19 public health emergency and then assumes growth at a constant rate in the subsequent years. Because recipients can estimate the revenue shortfall at multiple points in time throughout the covered period as revenue is collected, this approach accounts for variation across recipients in the timing of pandemic impacts.121 Although revenue may decline for reasons unrelated to the COVID–19 public health emergency, to minimize the administrative burden on recipients and taking into consideration the devastating effects of the COVID–19 public health emergency, any diminution in actual revenues relative to the counterfactual pre-pandemic trend would be presumed to have been due to the COVID–19 public health emergency. For purposes of measuring revenue growth in the counterfactual trend, recipients may use a growth adjustment of either 4.1 percent per year or the recipient’s average annual revenue growth over the three full fiscal years prior to the COVID–19 public health emergency, whichever is higher. The option of 4.1 percent represents the average annual growth across all State and local government ‘‘General Revenue from Own Sources’’ in the most recent three years of available data.122 This approach provides recipients with a standardized growth adjustment when calculating the counterfactual revenue trend and thus minimizes administrative burden, while not disadvantaging recipients with revenue growth that exceeded the national average prior to the COVID–19 public health emergency by permitting these recipients to use their own revenue growth rate over the preceding three years. Recipients should calculate the extent of the reduction in revenue as of four points in time: December 31, 2020; December 31, 2021; December 31, 2022; and December 31, 2023. To calculate the extent of the reduction in revenue at each of these dates, recipients should follow a four-step process: •Step 1: Identify revenues collected in the most recent full fiscal year prior to the public health emergency (i.e., last full fiscal year before January 27, 2020), called the base year revenue. •Step 2: Estimate counterfactual revenue, which is equal to base year revenue * [(1 + growth adjustment) ∧(n/ 12)], where n is the number of months elapsed since the end of the base year to the calculation date, and growth adjustment is the greater of 4.1 percent and the recipient’s average annual revenue growth in the three full fiscal VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:28 May 14, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\17MYR2.SGM 17MYR2 68 26801 Federal Register /Vol. 86, No. 93/Monday, May 17, 2021/Rules and Regulations 123Pay-go infrastructure funding refers to the practice of funding capital projects with cash-on- hand from taxes, fees, grants, and other sources, rather than with borrowed sums. years prior to the COVID–19 public health emergency. •Step 3: Identify actual revenue, which equals revenues collected over the past twelve months as of the calculation date. •Step 4: The extent of the reduction in revenue is equal to counterfactual revenue less actual revenue. If actual revenue exceeds counterfactual revenue, the extent of the reduction in revenue is set to zero for that calculation date. For illustration, consider a hypothetical recipient with base year revenue equal to 100. In Step 2, the hypothetical recipient finds that 4.1 percent is greater than the recipient’s average annual revenue growth in the three full fiscal years prior to the public health emergency. Furthermore, this recipient’s base year ends June 30. In this illustration, n (months elapsed) and counterfactual revenue would be equal to: As of: 12/31/2020 12/31/2021 12/31/2022 12/31/2023 n (months elapsed) .......................................................................................... 18 30 42 54 Counterfactual revenue:.................................................................................. 106.2 110.6 115.1 119.8 The overall methodology for calculating the reduction in revenue is illustrated in the figure below: Upon receiving Fiscal Recovery Fund payments, recipients may immediately calculate revenue loss for the period ending December 31, 2020. Sections 602(c)(1)(C) and 603(c)(1)(C) of the Act provide recipients with broad latitude to use the Fiscal Recovery Funds for the provision of government services. Government services can include, but are not limited to, maintenance or pay-go funded building 123 of infrastructure, including roads; modernization of cybersecurity, including hardware, software, and protection of critical infrastructure; health services; environmental remediation; school or educational services; and the provision of police, fire, and other public safety services. However, expenses associated with obligations under instruments evidencing financial indebtedness for borrowed money would not be considered the provision of government services, as these financing expenses do not directly provide services or aid to citizens. Specifically, government services would not include interest or principal on any outstanding debt instrument, including, for example, short-term revenue or tax anticipation notes, or fees or issuance costs associated with the issuance of new debt. For the same reasons, government services would not include satisfaction of any obligation arising under or pursuant to a settlement agreement, judgment, consent decree, or judicially confirmed debt restructuring in a judicial, administrative, or regulatory proceeding, except if the judgment or settlement required the provision of government services. That is, satisfaction of a settlement or judgment itself is not a government service, unless the settlement required the provision of government services. In addition, replenishing financial reserves (e.g., rainy day or other reserve funds) would not be considered provision of a government service, since such expenses do not directly relate to the provision of government services. Question 13: Are there sources of revenue that either should or should not be included in the interim final rule’s measure of ‘‘general revenue’’ for recipients? If so, discuss why these sources either should or should not be included. Question 14: In the interim final rule, recipients are expected to calculate the reduction in revenue on an aggregate basis. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of, and any potential concerns with, this approach, including circumstances in which it could be necessary or appropriate to calculate the reduction in revenue by source. Question 15: Treasury is considering whether to take into account other factors, including actions taken by the recipient as well as the expiration of the COVID–19 public health emergency, in determining whether to presume that revenue losses are ‘‘due to’’ the COVID– VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:28 May 14, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\17MYR2.SGM 17MYR2 ER17MY21.002</GPH>140 c::::::::J Base year revenue -Extent of reduction in revenue 130 -Actual revenue (last twelve months) -+--Counterfactual revenue 120 ------------110 ------------- 100 --- 90 80 "Q) ~ ~" ~'1, ~ ,:,-::f l1 rlf1 ,l1 0cJ Q Q Q Q 69 26802 Federal Register /Vol. 86, No. 93/Monday, May 17, 2021/Rules and Regulations 124Treasury notes that using funds to support or oppose collective bargaining would not be included as part of ‘‘necessary investments in water, sewer, or broadband infrastructure.’’ 125Sections 602(c)(1)(D), 603(c)(1)(D) of the Act. 126Environmental Protection Agency, Drinking Water State Revolving fund, https://www.epa.gov/ dwsrf (last visited Apr. 30, 2021); Environmental Protection Agency, Clean Water State Revolving Fund, https://www.epa.gov/cwsrf (last visited Apr. 30, 2021). 127Water Quality Act of 1987, Public Law 100– 4. 128Federal Water Pollution Control Act as amended, codified at 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq., common name (Clean Water Act). In 2009, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act created the Green Project Reserve, which increased the focus on green infrastructure, water and energy efficient, and environmentally innovative projects. Public Law 111–5. The CWA was amended by the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 to further expand the CWSRF’s eligibilities. Public Law 113–121. The CWSRF’s eligibilities were further expanded in 2018 by the America’s Water Infrastructure Act of 2018, Public Law 115–270. 129See Environmental Protection Agency, The Drinking Water State Revolving Funds: Financing America’s Drinking Water, EPA–816–R–00–023 (Nov. 2000), https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/ 200024WB.PDF?Dockey=200024WB.PDF; See also Environmental Protection Agency, Learn About the Clean Water State Revolving Fund, https:// www.epa.gov/cwsrf/learn-about-clean-water-state- revolving-fund-cwsrf (last visited Apr. 30, 2021). 13033 U.S.C. 1383(c). See also Environmental Protection Agency, Overview of Clean Water State Revolving Fund Eligibilities (May 2016), https:// www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-07/ documents/overview_of_cwsrf_eligibilities_may_ 2016.pdf; Claudia Copeland, Clean Water Act: A Summary of the Law, Congressional Research Service (Oct. 18, 2016), https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/ RL30030.pdf; Jonathan L Ramseur, Wastewater Infrastructure: Overview, Funding, and Legislative Developments, Congressional Research Service (May 22, 2018), https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/ R44963.pdf. 13142 U.S.C. 300j–12. 132Environmental Protection Agency, Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Eligibility Handbook, (June 2017), https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/ files/2017-06/documents/dwsrf_eligibility_ handbook_june_13_2017_updated_508_version.pdf; Environmental Protection Agency, Drinking Water 19 public health emergency. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this presumption, including when, if ever, during the covered period it would be appropriate to reevaluate the presumption that all losses are attributable to the COVID–19 public health emergency. Question 16: Do recipients anticipate lagged revenue effects of the public health emergency? If so, when would these lagged effects be expected to occur, and what can Treasury to do support these recipients through its implementation of the program? Question 17: In the interim final rule, paying interest or principal on government debt is not considered provision of a government service. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this approach, including circumstances in which paying interest or principal on government debt could be considered provision of a government service. D. Investments in Infrastructure To assist in meeting the critical need for investments and improvements to existing infrastructure in water, sewer, and broadband, the Fiscal Recovery Funds provide funds to State, local, and Tribal governments to make necessary investments in these sectors. The interim final rule outlines eligible uses within each category, allowing for a broad range of necessary investments in projects that improve access to clean drinking water, improve wastewater and stormwater infrastructure systems, and provide access to high-quality broadband service. Necessary investments are designed to provide an adequate minimum level of service and are unlikely to be made using private sources of funds. Necessary investments include projects that are required to maintain a level of service that, at least, meets applicable health-based standards, taking into account resilience to climate change, or establishes or improves broadband service to unserved or underserved populations to reach an adequate level to permit a household to work or attend school, and that are unlikely to be met with private sources of funds.124 It is important that necessary investments in water, sewer, or broadband infrastructure be carried out in ways that produce high-quality infrastructure, avert disruptive and costly delays, and promote efficiency. Treasury encourages recipients to ensure that water, sewer, and broadband projects use strong labor standards, including project labor agreements and community benefits agreements that offer wages at or above the prevailing rate and include local hire provisions, not only to promote effective and efficient delivery of high-quality infrastructure projects but also to support the economic recovery through strong employment opportunities for workers. Using these practices in construction projects may help to ensure a reliable supply of skilled labor that would minimize disruptions, such as those associated with labor disputes or workplace injuries. To provide public transparency on whether projects are using practices that promote on-time and on-budget delivery, Treasury will seek information from recipients on their workforce plans and practices related to water, sewer, and broadband projects undertaken with Fiscal Recovery Funds. Treasury will provide additional guidance and instructions on the reporting requirements at a later date. 1. Water and Sewer Infrastructure The ARPA provides funds to State, local, and Tribal governments to make necessary investments in water and sewer infrastructure.125 By permitting funds to be used for water and sewer infrastructure needs, Congress recognized the critical role that clean drinking water and services for the collection and treatment of wastewater and stormwater play in protecting public health. Understanding that State, local, and Tribal governments have a broad range of water and sewer infrastructure needs, the interim final rule provides these governments with wide latitude to identify investments in water and sewer infrastructure that are of the highest priority for their own communities, which may include projects on privately-owned infrastructure. The interim final rule does this by aligning eligible uses of the Fiscal Recovery Funds with the wide range of types or categories of projects that would be eligible to receive financial assistance through the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) or Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF).126 Established by the 1987 amendments 127 to the Clean Water Act (CWA),128 the CWSRF provides financial assistance for a wide range of water infrastructure projects to improve water quality and address water pollution in a way that enables each State to address and prioritize the needs of their populations. The types of projects eligible for CWSRF assistance include projects to construct, improve, and repair wastewater treatment plants, control non-point sources of pollution, improve resilience of infrastructure to severe weather events, create green infrastructure, and protect waterbodies from pollution.129 Each of the 51 State programs established under the CWSRF have the flexibility to direct funding to their particular environmental needs, and each State may also have its own statutes, rules, and regulations that guide project eligibility.130 The DWSRF was modeled on the CWSRF and created as part of the 1996 amendments to the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA),131 with the principal objective of helping public water systems obtain financing for improvements necessary to protect public health and comply with drinking water regulations.132 Like the CWSRF, VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:28 May 14, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\17MYR2.SGM 17MYR2 70 26803 Federal Register /Vol. 86, No. 93/Monday, May 17, 2021/Rules and Regulations Infrastructure Needs Survey and Assessment: Sixth Report to Congress (March 2018), https:// www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2018-10/ documents/corrected_sixth_drinking_water_ infrastructure_needs_survey_and_assessment.pdf. 133Id. 134Id. 13542 U.S.C. 300j–12(b)(3)(A). 136Environmental Protection Agency, Learn About the Clean Water State Revolving Fund, https://www.epa.gov/cwsrf/learn-about-clean-water- state-revolving-fund-cwsrf (last visited Apr. 30, 2021); 42 U.S.C. 300j–12. 137House Committee on the Budget, State and Local Governments are in Dire Need of Federal Relief (Aug. 19, 2020), https://budget.house.gov/ publications/report/state-and-local-governments- are-dire-need-federal-relief. 138Environmental Protection Agency, Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (Nov. 2019), https:// www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2019-11/ documents/fact_sheet_-_dwsrf_overview_final_ 0.pdf; Environmental Protection Agency, National Benefits Analysis for Drinking Water Regulations, https://www.epa.gov/sdwa/national-benefits- analysis-drinking-water-regulations (last visited Apr. 30, 2020). the DWSRF provides States with the flexibility to meet the needs of their populations.133 The primary use of DWSRF funds is to assist communities in making water infrastructure capital improvements, including the installation and replacement of failing treatment and distribution systems.134 In administering these programs, States must give priority to projects that ensure compliance with applicable health and environmental safety requirements; address the most serious risks to human health; and assist systems most in need on a per household basis according to State affordability criteria.135 By aligning use of Fiscal Recovery Funds with the categories or types of eligible projects under the existing EPA state revolving fund programs, the interim final rule provides recipients with the flexibility to respond to the needs of their communities while ensuring that investments in water and sewer infrastructure made using Fiscal Recovery Funds are necessary. As discussed above, the CWSRF and DWSRF were designed to provide funding for projects that protect public health and safety by ensuring compliance with wastewater and drinking water health standards.136 The need to provide funding through the state revolving funds suggests that these projects are less likely to be addressed with private sources of funding; for example, by remediating failing or inadequate infrastructure, much of which is publicly owned, and by addressing non-point sources of pollution. This approach of aligning with the EPA state revolving fund programs also supports expedited project identification and investment so that needed relief for the people and communities most affected by the pandemic can deployed expeditiously and have a positive impact on their health and wellbeing as soon as possible. Further, the interim final rule is intended to preserve flexibility for award recipients to direct funding to their own particular needs and priorities and would not preclude recipients from applying their own additional project eligibility criteria. In addition, responding to the immediate needs of the COVID–19 public health emergency may have diverted both personnel and financial resources from other State, local, and Tribal priorities, including projects to ensure compliance with applicable water health and quality standards and provide safe drinking and usable water.137 Through sections 602(c)(1)(D) and 603(c)(1)(D), the ARPA provides resources to address these needs. Moreover, using Fiscal Recovery Funds in accordance with the priorities of the CWA and SWDA to ‘‘assist systems most in need on a per household basis according to state affordability criteria’’ would also have the benefit of providing vulnerable populations with safe drinking water that is critical to their health and, thus, their ability to work and learn.138 Recipients may use Fiscal Recovery Funds to invest in a broad range of projects that improve drinking water infrastructure, such as building or upgrading facilities and transmission, distribution, and storage systems, including replacement of lead service lines. Given the lifelong impacts of lead exposure for children, and the widespread nature of lead service lines, Treasury encourages recipients to consider projects to replace lead service lines. Fiscal Recovery Funds may also be used to support the consolidation or establishment of drinking water systems. With respect to wastewater infrastructure, recipients may use Fiscal Recovery Funds to construct publicly owned treatment infrastructure, manage and treat stormwater or subsurface drainage water, facilitate water reuse, and secure publicly owned treatment works, among other uses. Finally, consistent with the CWSRF and DWSRF, Fiscal Recovery Funds may be used for cybersecurity needs to protect water or sewer infrastructure, such as developing effective cybersecurity practices and measures at drinking water systems and publicly owned treatment works. Many of the types of projects eligible under either the CWSRF or DWSRF also support efforts to address climate change. For example, by taking steps to manage potential sources of pollution and preventing these sources from reaching sources of drinking water, projects eligible under the DWSRF and the ARPA may reduce energy required to treat drinking water. Similarly, projects eligible under the CWSRF include measures to conserve and reuse water or reduce the energy consumption of public water treatment facilities. Treasury encourages recipients to consider green infrastructure investments and projects to improve resilience to the effects of climate change. For example, more frequent and extreme precipitation events combined with construction and development trends have led to increased instances of stormwater runoff, water pollution, and flooding. Green infrastructure projects that support stormwater system resiliency could include rain gardens that provide water storage and filtration benefits, and green streets, where vegetation, soil, and engineered systems are combined to direct and filter rainwater from impervious surfaces. In cases of a natural disaster, recipients may also use Fiscal Recovery Funds to provide relief, such as interconnecting water systems or rehabilitating existing wells during an extended drought. Question 18: What are the advantages and disadvantages of aligning eligible uses with the eligible project type requirements of the DWSRF and CWSRF? What other water or sewer project categories, if any, should Treasury consider in addition to DWSRF and CWSRF eligible projects? Should Treasury consider a broader general category of water and sewer projects? Question 19: What additional water and sewer infrastructure categories, if any, should Treasury consider to address and respond to the needs of unserved, undeserved, or rural communities? How do these projects differ from DWSFR and CWSRF eligible projects? Question 20: What new categories of water and sewer infrastructure, if any, should Treasury consider to support State, local, and Tribal governments in mitigating the negative impacts of climate change? Discuss emerging technologies and processes that support resiliency of water and sewer infrastructure. Discuss any challenges faced by States and local governments when pursuing or implementing climate resilient infrastructure projects. Question 21: Infrastructure projects related to dams and reservoirs are generally not eligible under the CWSRF and DWSRF categories. Should Treasury consider expanding eligible VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:28 May 14, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\17MYR2.SGM 17MYR2 71 26804 Federal Register /Vol. 86, No. 93/Monday, May 17, 2021/Rules and Regulations 139See, e.g., https://www.ntia.gov/blog/2020/ more-half-american-households-used-internet- health-related-activities-2019-ntia-data-show; https://www.ntia.gov/blog/2020/nearly-third- american-employees-worked-remotely-2019-ntia- data-show; and generally, https://www.ntia.gov/ data/digital-nation-data-explorer. 140As an example, data from the Federal Communications Commission shows that as of June 2020, 9.07 percent of the U.S. population had no available cable or fiber broadband providers providing greater than 25 Mbps download speeds and 3 Mbps upload speeds. Availability was significantly less for rural versus urban populations, with 35.57 percent of the rural population lacking such access, compared with 2.57 percent of the urban population. Availability was also significantly less for tribal versus non-tribal populations, with 35.93 percent of the tribal population lacking such access, compared with 8.74 of the non-tribal population. Federal Communications Commission, Fixed Broadband Deployment, https://broadbandmap.fcc.gov/#/ (last visited May 9, 2021). 141How Do U.S. Internet Costs Compare To The Rest Of The World?, BroadbandSearch Blog Post, available at https://www.broadbandsearch.net/blog/ internet-costs-compared-worldwide. 142See, e.g., Federal Communications Commission, Fourteenth Broadband Deployment Report, available at https://docs.fcc.gov/public/ attachments/FCC-21-18A1.pdf. 143See, e.g., Illinois Department of Commerce & Economic Opportunity, Broadband Grants, h (last visited May 9, 2021), https://www2.illinois.gov/ dceo/ConnectIllinois/Pages/BroadbandGrants.aspx; Kansas Office of Broadband Development, Broadband Acceleration Grant, https:// www.kansascommerce.gov/wp-content/uploads/ 2020/11/Broadband-Acceleration-Grant.pdf (last visited May 9, 2021); New York State Association of Counties, Universal Broadband: Deploying High Speed Internet Access in NYS (Jul. 2017), https:// www.nysac.org/files/BroadbandUpdate Report2017(1).pdf. 144This scalability threshold is consistent with scalability requirements used in other jurisdictions. Id. 145Federal Communications Commission, Broadband Speed Guide, https://www.fcc.gov/ consumers/guides/broadband-speed-guide (last visited Apr. 30, 2021). 146Letter from Lisa R. Youngers, President and CEO of Fiber Broadband Association to FCC, WC Docket No. 19–126 (filed Jan. 3, 2020), including an Appendix with research from RVA LLC, Data Review Of The Importance of Upload Speeds (Jan. 2020), and Ookla speed test data, available at https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/101030085118517/ FCC%20RDOF%20Jan%203%20 Ex%20Parte.pdf.Additional information on historic growth in data usage is provided in Schools, Health & Libraries Broadband Coalition, Common Sense Solutions for Closing the Digital Divide, Apr. 29, 2021. 147Id. See also United States’s Mobile and Broadband internet Speeds—Speedtest Global Index, available at https://www.speedtest.net/ global-index/united-states#fixed. infrastructure under the interim final rule to include dam and reservoir projects? Discuss public health, environmental, climate, or equity benefits and costs in expanding the eligibility to include these types of projects. 2. Broadband Infrastructure The COVID–19 public health emergency has underscored the importance of universally available, high-speed, reliable, and affordable broadband coverage as millions of Americans rely on the internet to participate in, among critical activities, remote school, healthcare, and work. Recognizing the need for such connectivity, the ARPA provides funds to State, territorial, local, and Tribal governments to make necessary investments in broadband infrastructure. The National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) highlighted the growing necessity of broadband in daily lives through its analysis of NTIA Internet Use Survey data, noting that Americans turn to broadband internet access service for every facet of daily life including work, study, and healthcare.139 With increased use of technology for daily activities and the movement by many businesses and schools to operating remotely during the pandemic, broadband has become even more critical for people across the country to carry out their daily lives. By at least one measure, however, tens of millions of Americans live in areas where there is no broadband infrastructure that provides download speeds greater than 25 Mbps and upload speeds of 3 Mbps.140 By contrast, as noted below, many households use upload and download speeds of 100 Mbps to meet their daily needs. Even in areas where broadband infrastructure exists, broadband access may be out of reach for millions of Americans because it is unaffordable, as the United States has some of the highest broadband prices in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).141 There are disparities in availability as well; historically, Americans living in territories and Tribal lands as well as rural areas have disproportionately lacked sufficient broadband infrastructure.142 Moreover, rapidly growing demand has, and will likely continue to, quickly outpace infrastructure capacity, a phenomenon acknowledged by various states around the country that have set scalability requirements to account for this anticipated growth in demand.143 The interim final rule provides that eligible investments in broadband are those that are designed to provide services meeting adequate speeds and are provided to unserved and underserved households and businesses. Understanding that States, territories, localities, and Tribal governments have a wide range of varied broadband infrastructure needs, the interim final rule provides award recipients with flexibility to identify the specific locations within their communities to be served and to otherwise design the project. Under the interim final rule, eligible projects are expected to be designed to deliver, upon project completion, service that reliably meets or exceeds symmetrical upload and download speeds of 100 Mbps. There may be instances in which it would not be practicable for a project to deliver such service speeds because of the geography, topography, or excessive costs associated with such a project. In these instances, the affected project would be expected to be designed to deliver, upon project completion, service that reliably meets or exceeds 100 Mbps download and between at least 20 Mbps and 100 Mbps upload speeds and be scalable to a minimum of 100 Mbps symmetrical for download and upload speeds.144 In setting these standards, Treasury identified speeds necessary to ensure that broadband infrastructure is sufficient to enable users to generally meet household needs, including the ability to support the simultaneous use of work, education, and health applications, and also sufficiently robust to meet increasing household demands for bandwidth. Treasury also recognizes that different communities and their members may have a broad range of internet needs and that those needs may change over time. In considering the appropriate speed requirements for eligible projects, Treasury considered estimates of typical households demands during the pandemic. Using the Federal Communication Commission’s (FCC) Broadband Speed Guide, for example, a household with two telecommuters and two to three remote learners today are estimated to need 100 Mbps download to work simultaneously.145 In households with more members, the demands may be greater, and in households with fewer members, the demands may be less. In considering the appropriate speed requirements for eligible projects, Treasury also considered data usage patterns and how bandwidth needs have changed over time for U.S. households and businesses as people’s use of technology in their daily lives has evolved. In the few years preceding the pandemic, market research data showed that average upload speeds in the United States surpassed over 10 Mbps in 2017 146 and continued to increase significantly, with the average upload speed as of November, 2019 increasing to 48.41 Mbps,147 attributable, in part to a shift to using broadband and the internet by individuals and businesses VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:28 May 14, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\17MYR2.SGM 17MYR2 72 26805 Federal Register /Vol. 86, No. 93/Monday, May 17, 2021/Rules and Regulations 148Id. 149One high definition Zoom meeting or class requires approximately 3.8 Mbps/3.0 Mbps (up/ down). 150See, e.g., Zoom, System Requirements for Windows, macOS, and Linux, https:// support.zoom.us/hc/en-us/articles/201362023- System-requirements-for-Windows-macOS-and- Linux#h_d278c327-e03d-4896-b19a-96a8f3c0c69c (last visited May 8, 2021). 151By one estimate, to upload a one gigabit video file to YouTube would take 15 minutes at an upload speed of 10 Mbps compared with 1 minute, 30 seconds at an upload speed of 100 Mbps, and 30 seconds at an upload speed of 300 Mbps. Reviews.org: What is Symmetrical internet? (March 2020). 152OVBI: Covid-19 Drove 15 percent Increase in Broadband Traffic in 2020, OpenVault, Quarterly Advisory, (Feb. 10, 2021), available at https:// openvault.com/ovbi-covid-19-drove-51-increase-in- broadband-traffic-in-2020; See OpenVault’s data set incorporates information on usage by subscribers across multiple continents, including North America and Europe. Additional data and detail on increases in the amount of data users consume and the broadband speeds they are using is provided in OpenVault Broadband Insights Report Q4, Quarterly Advisory (Feb. 10, 2021), available at https://openvault.com/complimentary-report-4q20/. 153OVBI Special Report: 202 Upstream Growth Nearly 4X of Pre-Pandemic Years, OpenVault, Quarterly Advisory, (April 1, 20201), available at https://openvault.com/ovbi-special-report-2020- upstream-growth-rate-nearly-4x-of-pre-pandemic- years/; Additional data is provided in OpenVault Broadband Insights Pandemic Impact on Upstream Broadband Usage and Network Capacity, available at https://openvault.com/upstream-whitepaper/. 154Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Fixed broadband subscriptions per 100 inhabitants, per speed tiers (June 2020), https:// www.oecd.org/sti/broadband/5.1-FixedBB- SpeedTiers-2020-06.xls www.oecd.org/sti/ broadband/broadband-statistics. 155Rural Digital Opportunity Fund, Report and Order, 35 FCC Rcd 686, 690, para. 9 (2020), available at https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc- launches-20-billion-rural-digital-opportunity-fund- 0. 156The BIPP was authorized by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, Section 905, Public Law 116–260, 134 Stat. 1182 (Dec. 27, 2020). 157Section 905(d)(4) of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021. 158Deployment Report, supra note 142. 159Rural Digital Opportunity Fund, supra note 156. to create and share content using video sharing, video conferencing, and other applications.148 The increasing use of data accelerated markedly during the pandemic as households across the country became increasingly reliant on tools and applications that require greater internet capacity, both to download data but also to upload data. Sending information became as important as receiving it. A video consultation with a healthcare provider or participation by a child in a live classroom with a teacher and fellow students requires video to be sent and received simultaneously.149 As an example, some video conferencing technology platforms indicate that download and upload speeds should be roughly equal to support two-way, interactive video meetings.150 For both work and school, client materials or completed school assignments, which may be in the form of PDF files, videos, or graphic files, also need to be shared with others. This is often done by uploading materials to a collaboration site, and the upload speed available to a user can have a significant impact on the time it takes for the content to be shared with others. 151 These activities require significant capacity from home internet connections to both download and upload data, especially when there are multiple individuals in one household engaging in these activities simultaneously. This need for increased broadband capacity during the pandemic was reflected in increased usage patterns seen over the last year. As OpenVault noted in recent advisories, the pandemic significantly increased the amount of data users consume. Among data users observed by OpenVault, per- subscriber average data usage for the fourth quarter of 2020 was 482.6 gigabytes per month, representing a 40 percent increase over the 344 gigabytes consumed in the fourth quarter of 2019 and a 26 percent increase over the third quarter 2020 average of 383.8 gigabytes.152 OpenVault also noted significant increases in upstream usage among the data users it observed, with upstream data usage growing 63 percent—from 19 gigabytes to 31 gigabytes—between December, 2019 and December, 2020.153 According to an OECD Broadband statistic from June 2020, the largest percentage of U.S. broadband subscribers have services providing speeds between 100 Mbps and 1 Gbps.154 Jurisdictions and Federal programs are increasingly responding to the growing demands of their communities for both heightened download and upload speeds. For example, Illinois now requires 100 Mbps symmetrical service as the construction standard for its state broadband grant programs. This standard is also consistent with speed levels, particularly download speed levels, prioritized by other Federal programs supporting broadband projects. Bids submitted as part of the FCC in its Rural Digital Opportunity Fund (RDOF), established to support the construction of broadband networks in rural communities across the country, are given priority if they offer faster service, with the service offerings of 100 Mbps download and 20 Mbps upload being included in the ‘‘above baseline’’ performance tier set by the FCC.155 The Broadband Infrastructure Program (BBIP)156 of the Department of Commerce, which provides Federal funding to deploy broadband infrastructure to eligible service areas of the country also prioritizes projects designed to provide broadband service with a download speed of not less than 100 Mbps and an upload speed of not less than 20 Mbps.157 The 100 Mbps upload and download speeds will support the increased and growing needs of households and businesses. Recognizing that, in some instances, 100 Mbps upload speed may be impracticable due to geographical, topographical, or financial constraints, the interim final rule permits upload speeds of between at least 20 Mbps and 100 Mbps in such instances. To provide for investments that will accommodate technologies requiring symmetry in download and upload speeds, as noted above, eligible projects that are not designed to deliver, upon project completion, service that reliably meets or exceeds symmetrical speeds of 100 Mbps because it would be impracticable to do so should be designed so that they can be scalable to such speeds. Recipients are also encouraged to prioritize investments in fiber optic infrastructure where feasible, as such advanced technology enables the next generation of application solutions for all communities. Under the interim final rule, eligible projects are expected to focus on locations that are unserved or underserved. The interim final rule treats users as being unserved or underserved if they lack access to a wireline connection capable of reliably delivering at least minimum speeds of 25 Mbps download and 3 Mbps upload as households and businesses lacking this level of access are generally not viewed as being able to originate and receive high-quality voice, data, graphics, and video telecommunications. This threshold is consistent with the FCC’s benchmark for an ‘‘advanced telecommunications capability.’’158 This threshold is also consistent with thresholds used in other Federal programs to identify eligible areas to be served by programs to improve broadband services. For example, in the FCC’s RDOF program, eligible areas include those without current (or already funded) access to terrestrial broadband service providing 25 Mbps download and 3 Mbps upload speeds.159 The Department of Commerce’s BBIP also considers households to be ‘‘unserved’’ generally if they lack access to broadband service VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:28 May 14, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\17MYR2.SGM 17MYR2 73 26806 Federal Register /Vol. 86, No. 93/Monday, May 17, 2021/Rules and Regulations with a download speed of not less than 25 Mbps download and 3 Mbps upload, among other conditions. In selecting an area to be served by a project, recipients are encouraged to avoid investing in locations that have existing agreements to build reliable wireline service with minimum speeds of 100 Mbps download and 20 Mbps upload by December 31, 2024, in order to avoid duplication of efforts and resources. Recipients are also encouraged to consider ways to integrate affordability options into their program design. To meet the immediate needs of unserved and underserved households and businesses, recipients are encouraged to focus on projects that deliver a physical broadband connection by prioritizing projects that achieve last mile- connections. Treasury also encourages recipients to prioritize support for broadband networks owned, operated by, or affiliated with local governments, non-profits, and co-operatives— providers with less pressure to turn profits and with a commitment to serving entire communities. Under sections 602(c)(1)(A) and 603(c)(1)(A), assistance to households facing negative economic impacts due to COVID–19 is also an eligible use, including internet access or digital literacy assistance. As discussed above, in considering whether a potential use is eligible under this category, a recipient must consider whether, and the extent to which, the household has experienced a negative economic impact from the pandemic. Question 22: What are the advantages and disadvantages of setting minimum symmetrical download and upload speeds of 100 Mbps? What other minimum standards would be appropriate and why? Question 23: Would setting such a minimum be impractical for particular types of projects? If so, where and on what basis should those projects be identified? How could such a standard be set while also taking into account the practicality of using this standard in particular types of projects? In addition to topography, geography, and financial factors, what other constraints, if any, are relevant to considering whether an investment is impracticable? Question 24: What are the advantages and disadvantages of setting a minimum level of service at 100 Mbps download and 20 Mbps upload in projects where it is impracticable to set minimum symmetrical download and upload speeds of 100 Mbps? What are the advantages and disadvantages of setting a scalability requirement in these cases? What other minimum standards would be appropriate and why? Question 25: What are the advantages and disadvantages of focusing these investments on those without access to a wireline connection that reliably delivers 25 Mbps download by 3 Mbps upload? Would another threshold be appropriate and why? Question 26: What are the advantages and disadvantages of setting any particular threshold for identifying unserved or underserved areas, minimum speed standards or scalability minimum? Are there other standards that should be set (e.g., latency)? If so, why and how? How can such threshold, standards, or minimum be set in a way that balances the public’s interest in making sure that reliable broadband services meeting the daily needs of all Americans are available throughout the country with the providing recipients flexibility to meet the varied needs of their communities? III. Restrictions on Use As discussed above, recipients have considerable flexibility to use Fiscal Recovery Funds to address the diverse needs of their communities. To ensure that payments from the Fiscal Recovery Funds are used for these congressionally permitted purposes, the ARPA includes two provisions that further define the boundaries of the statute’s eligible uses. Section 602(c)(2)(A) of the Act provides that States and territories may not ‘‘use the funds . . . to either directly or indirectly offset a reduction in . . . net tax revenue . . . resulting from a change in law, regulation, or administrative interpretation during the covered period that reduces any tax . . . or delays the imposition of any tax or tax increase.’’ In addition, sections 602(c)(2)(B) and 603(c)(2) prohibit any recipient, including cities, nonentitlement units of government, and counties, from using Fiscal Recovery Funds for deposit into any pension fund. These restrictions support the use of funds for the congressionally permitted purposes described in Section II of this Supplementary Information by providing a backstop against the use of funds for purposes outside of the eligible use categories. These provisions give force to Congress’s clear intent that Fiscal Recovery Funds be spent within the four eligible uses identified in the statute—(1) to respond to the public health emergency and its negative economic impacts, (2) to provide premium pay to essential workers, (3) to provide government services to the extent of eligible governments’ revenue losses, and (4) to make necessary water, sewer, and broadband infrastructure investments—and not otherwise. These four eligible uses reflect Congress’s judgment that the Fiscal Recovery Funds should be expended in particular ways that support recovery from the COVID–19 public health emergency. The further restrictions reflect Congress’s judgment that tax cuts and pension deposits do not fall within these eligible uses. The interim final rule describes how Treasury will identify when such uses have occurred and how it will recoup funds put toward these impermissible uses and, as discussed in Section VIII of this SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, establishes a reporting framework for monitoring the use of Fiscal Recovery Funds for eligible uses. A. Deposit Into Pension Funds The statute provides that recipients may not use Fiscal Recovery Funds for ‘‘deposit into any pension fund.’’ For the reasons discussed below, Treasury interprets ‘‘deposit’’ in this context to refer to an extraordinary payment into a pension fund for the purpose of reducing an accrued, unfunded liability. More specifically, the interim final rule does not permit this assistance to be used to make a payment into a pension fund if both: 1. The payment reduces a liability incurred prior to the start of the COVID– 19 public health emergency, and 2. the payment occurs outside the recipient’s regular timing for making such payments. Under this interpretation, a ‘‘deposit’’ is distinct from a ‘‘payroll contribution,’’ which occurs when employers make payments into pension funds on regular intervals, with contribution amounts based on a pre- determined percentage of employees’ wages and salaries. As discussed above, eligible uses for premium pay and responding to the negative economic impacts of the COVID–19 public health emergency include hiring and compensating public sector employees. Interpreting the scope of ‘‘deposit’’ to exclude contributions that are part of payroll contributions is more consistent with these eligible uses and would reduce administrative burden for recipients. Accordingly, if an employee’s wages and salaries are an eligible use of Fiscal Recovery Funds, recipients may treat the employee’s covered benefits as an eligible use of Fiscal Recovery Funds. For purposes of the Fiscal Recovery Funds, covered benefits include costs of all types of leave (vacation, family-related, sick, military, bereavement, sabbatical, jury duty), employee insurance (health, life, dental, vision), retirement (pensions, 401(k)), unemployment benefit plans VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:28 May 14, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\17MYR2.SGM 17MYR2 74 26807 Federal Register /Vol. 86, No. 93/Monday, May 17, 2021/Rules and Regulations 160In this sub-section, ‘‘recipient governments’’ refers only to States and territories. In other sections, ‘‘recipient governments’’ refers more broadly to eligible governments receiving funding from the Fiscal Recovery Funds. 161For brevity, referred to as ‘‘changes in law, regulation, or interpretation’’ for the remainder of this preamble. (Federal and State), workers’ compensation insurance, and Federal Insurance Contributions Act taxes (which includes Social Security and Medicare taxes). Treasury anticipates that this approach to employees’ covered benefits will be comprehensive and, for employees whose wage and salary costs are eligible expenses, will allow all covered benefits listed in the previous paragraph to be eligible under the Fiscal Recovery Funds. Treasury expects that this will minimize the administrative burden on recipients by treating all the specified covered benefit types as eligible expenses, for employees whose wage and salary costs are eligible expenses. Question 27: Beyond a ‘‘deposit’’ and a ‘‘payroll contribution,’’ are there other types of payments into a pension fund that Treasury should consider? B. Offset a Reduction in Net Tax Revenue For States and territories (recipient governments160), section 602(c)(2)(A)— the offset provision—prohibits the use of Fiscal Recovery Funds to directly or indirectly offset a reduction in net tax revenue resulting from a change in law, regulation, or administrative interpretation 161 during the covered period. If a State or territory uses Fiscal Recovery Funds to offset a reduction in net tax revenue, the ARPA provides that the State or territory must repay to the Treasury an amount equal to the lesser of (i) the amount of the applicable reduction attributable to the impermissible offset and (ii) the amount received by the State or territory under the ARPA. See Section IV of this SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. As discussed below Section IV of this SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, a State or territory that chooses to use Fiscal Recovery Funds to offset a reduction in net tax revenue does not forfeit its entire allocation of Fiscal Recovery Funds (unless it misused the full allocation to offset a reduction in net tax revenue) or any non-ARPA funding received. The interim final rule implements these conditions by establishing a framework for States and territories to determine the cost of changes in law, regulation, or interpretation that reduce tax revenue and to identify and value the sources of funds that will offset— i.e., cover the cost of—any reduction in net tax revenue resulting from such changes. A recipient government would only be considered to have used Fiscal Recovery Funds to offset a reduction in net tax revenue resulting from changes in law, regulation, or interpretation if, and to the extent that, the recipient government could not identify sufficient funds from sources other than the Fiscal Recovery Funds to offset the reduction in net tax revenue. If sufficient funds from other sources cannot be identified to cover the full cost of the reduction in net tax revenue resulting from changes in law, regulation, or interpretation, the remaining amount not covered by these sources will be considered to have been offset by Fiscal Recovery Funds, in contravention of the offset provision. The interim final rule recognizes three sources of funds that may offset a reduction in net tax revenue other than Fiscal Recovery Funds—organic growth, increases in revenue (e.g., an increase in a tax rate), and certain cuts in spending. In order to reduce burden, the interim final rule’s approach also incorporates the types of information and modeling already used by States and territories in their own fiscal and budgeting processes. By incorporating existing budgeting processes and capabilities, States and territories will be able to assess and evaluate the relationship of tax and budget decisions to uses of the Fiscal Recovery Funds based on information they likely have or can obtain. This approach ensures that recipient governments have the information they need to understand the implications of their decisions regarding the use of the Fiscal Recovery Funds— and, in particular, whether they are using the funds to directly or indirectly offset a reduction in net tax revenue, making them potentially subject to recoupment. Reporting on both the eligible uses and on a State’s or territory’s covered tax changes that would reduce tax revenue will enable identification of, and recoupment for, use of Fiscal Recovery Funds to directly offset reductions in tax revenue resulting from tax relief. Moreover, this approach recognizes that, because money is fungible, even if Fiscal Recovery Funds are not explicitly or directly used to cover the costs of changes that reduce net tax revenue, those funds may be used in a manner inconsistent with the statute by indirectly being used to substitute for the State’s or territory’s funds that would otherwise have been needed to cover the costs of the reduction. By focusing on the cost of changes that reduce net tax revenue— and how a recipient government is offsetting those reductions in constructing its budget over the covered period—the framework prevents efforts to use Fiscal Recovery Funds to indirectly offset reductions in net tax revenue for which the recipient government has not identified other offsetting sources of funding. As discussed in greater detail below in this preamble, the framework set forth in the interim final rule establishes a step-by-step process for determining whether, and the extent to which, Fiscal Recovery Funds have been used to offset a reduction in net tax revenue. Based on information reported annually by the recipient government: •First, each year, each recipient government will identify and value the changes in law, regulation, or interpretation that would result in a reduction in net tax revenue, as it would in the ordinary course of its budgeting process. The sum of these values in the year for which the government is reporting is the amount it needs to ‘‘pay for’’ with sources other than Fiscal Recovery Funds (total value of revenue reducing changes). •Second, the interim final rule recognizes that it may be difficult to predict how a change would affect net tax revenue in future years and, accordingly, provides that if the total value of the changes in the year for which the recipient government is reporting is below a de minimis level, as discussed below, the recipient government need not identify any sources of funding to pay for revenue reducing changes and will not be subject to recoupment. •Third, a recipient government will consider the amount of actual tax revenue recorded in the year for which they are reporting. If the recipient government’s actual tax revenue is greater than the amount of tax revenue received by the recipient for the fiscal year ending 2019, adjusted annually for inflation, the recipient government will not be considered to have violated the offset provision because there will not have been a reduction in net tax revenue. •Fourth, if the recipient government’s actual tax revenue is less than the amount of tax revenue received by the recipient government for the fiscal year ending 2019, adjusted annually for inflation, in the reporting year the recipient government will identify any sources of funds that have been used to permissibly offset the total value of covered tax changes other than Fiscal Recovery Funds. These are: Æ State or territory tax changes that would increase any source of general VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:28 May 14, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\17MYR2.SGM 17MYR2 75 26808 Federal Register /Vol. 86, No. 93/Monday, May 17, 2021/Rules and Regulations 162See, e.g., Tax Policy Center, How do state earned income tax credits work?, https:// www.taxpolicycenter.org/briefing-book/how-do- state-earned-income-tax-credits-work/ (last visited May 9, 2021). 163U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis, GDP Price Deflator, https:// www.bea.gov/data/prices-inflation/gdp-price- deflator (last visited May 9, 2021). 164Using Fiscal Year 2019 is consistent with section 602 as Congress provided for using that baseline for determining the impact of revenue loss affecting the provision of government services. See section 602(c)(1)(C). 165Congressional Budget Office, An Overview of the Economic Outlook: 2021 to 2031 (February 1, 2021), available at https://www.cbo.gov/ publication/56965. 166U.S. Census Bureau, Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances Glossary, https:// www.census.gov/programs-surveys/state/about/ glossary.html (last visited Apr. 30, 2021). fund revenue, such as a change that would increase a tax rate; and Æ Spending cuts in areas not being replaced by Fiscal Recovery Funds. The recipient government will calculate the value of revenue reduction remaining after applying these sources of offsetting funding to the total value of revenue reducing changes—that, is, how much of the tax change has not been paid for. The recipient government will then compare that value to the difference between the baseline and actual tax revenue. A recipient government will not be required to repay to the Treasury an amount that is greater than the recipient government’s actual tax revenue shortfall relative to the baseline (i.e., fiscal year 2019 tax revenue adjusted for inflation). This ‘‘revenue reduction cap,’’ together with Step 3, ensures that recipient governments can use organic revenue growth to offset the cost of revenue reductions. •Finally, if there are any amounts that could be subject to recoupment, Treasury will provide notice to the recipient government of such amounts. This process is discussed in greater detail in Section IV of this SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. Together, these steps allow Treasury to identify the amount of reduction in net tax revenue that both is attributable to covered changes and has been directly or indirectly offset with Fiscal Recovery Funds. This process ensures Fiscal Recovery Funds are used in a manner consistent with the statute’s defined eligible uses and the offset provision’s limitation on these eligible uses, while avoiding undue interference with State and territory decisions regarding tax and spending policies. The interim final rule also implements a process for recouping Fiscal Recovery Funds that were used to offset reductions in net tax revenue, including the calculation of any amounts that may be subject to recoupment, a process for a recipient government to respond to a notice of recoupment, and clarification regarding amounts excluded from recoupment. See Section IV of this SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. The interim final rule includes several definitions that are applicable to the implementation of the offset provision. Covered change. The offset provision is triggered by a reduction in net tax revenue resulting from ‘‘a change in law, regulation, or administrative interpretation.’’ A covered change includes any final legislative or regulatory action, a new or changed administrative interpretation, and the phase-in or taking effect of any statute or rule where the phase-in or taking effect was not prescribed prior to the start of the covered period. Changed administrative interpretations would not include corrections to replace prior inaccurate interpretations; such corrections would instead be treated as changes implementing legislation enacted or regulations issued prior to the covered period; the operative change in those circumstances is the underlying legislation or regulation that occurred prior to the covered period. Moreover, only the changes within the control of the State or territory are considered covered changes. Covered changes do not include a change in rate that is triggered automatically and based on statutory or regulatory criteria in effect prior to the covered period. For example, a state law that sets its earned income tax credit (EITC) at a fixed percentage of the Federal EITC will see its EITC payments automatically increase—and thus its tax revenue reduced—because of the Federal Government’s expansion of the EITC in the ARPA.162 This would not be considered a covered change. In addition, the offset provision applies only to actions for which the change in policy occurs during the covered period; it excludes regulations or other actions that implement a change or law substantively enacted prior to March 3, 2021. Finally, Treasury has determined and previously announced that income tax changes—even those made during the covered period—that simply conform with recent changes in Federal law (including those to conform to recent changes in Federal taxation of unemployment insurance benefits and taxation of loan forgiveness under the Paycheck Protection Program) are permissible under the offset provision. Baseline. For purposes of measuring a reduction in net tax revenue, the interim final rule measures actual changes in tax revenue relative to a revenue baseline (baseline). The baseline will be calculated as fiscal year 2019 (FY 2019) tax revenue indexed for inflation in each year of the covered period, with inflation calculated using the Bureau of Economic Analysis’s Implicit Price Deflator.163 FY 2019 was chosen as the starting year for the baseline because it is the last full fiscal year prior to the COVID– 19 public health emergency.164 This baseline year is consistent with the approach directed by the ARPA in sections 602(c)(1)(C) and 603(c)(1)(C), which identify the ‘‘most recent full fiscal year of the [State, territory, or Tribal government] prior to the emergency’’ as the comparator for measuring revenue loss. U.S. gross domestic product is projected to rebound to pre-pandemic levels in 2021,165 suggesting that an FY 2019 pre- pandemic baseline is a reasonable comparator for future revenue levels. The FY 2019 baseline revenue will be adjusted annually for inflation to allow for direct comparison of actual tax revenue in each year (reported in nominal terms) to baseline revenue in common units of measurement; without inflation adjustment, each dollar of reported actual tax revenue would be worth less than each dollar of baseline revenue expressed in 2019 terms. Reporting year. The interim final rule defines ‘‘reporting year’’ as a single year within the covered period, aligned to the current fiscal year of the recipient government during the covered period, for which a recipient government reports the value of covered changes and any sources of offsetting revenue increases (‘‘in-year’’ value), regardless of when those changes were enacted. For the fiscal years ending in 2021 or 2025 (partial years), the term ‘‘reporting year’’ refers to the portion of the year falling within the covered period. For example, the reporting year for a fiscal year beginning July 2020 and ending June 2021 would be from March 3, 2021 to July 2021. Tax revenue. The interim final rule’s definition of ‘‘tax revenue’’ is based on the Census Bureau’s definition of taxes, used for its Annual Survey of State Government Finances.166 It provides a consistent, well-established definition with which States and territories will be familiar and is consistent with the approach taken in Section II.C of this SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION describing the implementation of sections 602(c)(1)(C) and 603(c)(1)(C) of the Act, regarding revenue loss. Consistent with the approach described in Section II.C of this SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, tax VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:28 May 14, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\17MYR2.SGM 17MYR2 76 26809 Federal Register /Vol. 86, No. 93/Monday, May 17, 2021/Rules and Regulations 167See, e.g., Megan Randall & Kim Rueben, Tax Policy Center, Sustainable Budgeting in the States: Evidence on State Budget Institutions and Practices (Nov. 2017), available at https:// www.taxpolicycenter.org/sites/default/files/ publication/149186/sustainable-budgeting-in-the- states_1.pdf. 168Data provided by the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center for state-level EITC changes for 2004– 2017. revenue does not include revenue taxed and collected by a different unit of government (e.g., revenue from taxes levied by a local government and transferred to a recipient government). Framework. The interim final rule provides a step-by-step framework, to be used in each reporting year, to calculate whether the offset provision applies to a State’s or territory’s use of Fiscal Recovery Funds: (1) Covered changes that reduce tax revenue. For each reporting year, a recipient government will identify and value covered changes that the recipient government predicts will have the effect of reducing tax revenue in a given reporting year, similar to the way it would in the ordinary course of its budgeting process. The value of these covered changes may be reported based on estimated values produced by a budget model, incorporating reasonable assumptions, that aligns with the recipient government’s existing approach for measuring the effects of fiscal policies, and that measures relative to a current law baseline. The covered changes may also be reported based on actual values using a statistical methodology to isolate the change in year-over-year revenue attributable to the covered change(s), relative to the current law baseline prior to the change(s). Further, estimation approaches should not use dynamic methodologies that incorporate the projected effects of macroeconomic growth because macroeconomic growth is accounted for separately in the framework. Relative to these dynamic scoring methodologies, scoring methodologies that do not incorporate projected effects of macroeconomic growth rely on fewer assumptions and thus provide greater consistency among States and territories. Dynamic scoring that incorporates macroeconomic growth may also increase the likelihood of underestimation of the cost of a reduction in tax revenue. In general and where possible, reporting should be produced by the agency of the recipient government responsible for estimating the costs and effects of fiscal policy changes. This approach offers recipient governments the flexibility to determine their reporting methodology based on their existing budget scoring practices and capabilities. In addition, the approach of using the projected value of changes in law that enact fiscal policies to estimate the net effect of such policies is consistent with the way many States and territories already consider tax changes.167 (2) In excess of the de minimis. The recipient government will next calculate the total value of all covered changes in the reporting year resulting in revenue reductions, identified in Step 1. If the total value of the revenue reductions resulting from these changes is below the de minimis level, the recipient government will be deemed not to have any revenue-reducing changes for the purpose of determining the recognized net reduction. If the total is above the de minimis level, the recipient government must identify sources of in-year revenue to cover the full costs of changes that reduce tax revenue. The de minimis level is calculated as 1 percent of the reporting year’s baseline. Treasury recognizes that, pursuant to their taxing authority, States and territories may make many small changes to alter the composition of their tax revenues or implement other policies with marginal effects on tax revenues. They may also make changes based on projected revenue effects that turn out to differ from actual effects, unintentionally resulting in minor revenue changes that are not fairly described as ‘‘resulting from’’ tax law changes. The de minimis level recognizes the inherent challenges and uncertainties that recipient governments face, and thus allows relatively small reductions in tax revenue without consequence. Treasury determined the 1 percent level by assessing the historical effects of state-level tax policy changes in state EITCs implemented to effect policy goals other than reducing net tax revenues.168 The 1 percent de minimis level reflects the historical reductions in revenue due to minor changes in state fiscal policies. (3) Safe harbor. The recipient government will then compare the reporting year’s actual tax revenue to the baseline. If actual tax revenue is greater than the baseline, Treasury will deem the recipient government not to have any recognized net reduction for the reporting year, and therefore to be in a safe harbor and outside the ambit of the offset provision. This approach is consistent with the ARPA, which contemplates recoupment of Fiscal Recovery Funds only in the event that such funds are used to offset a reduction in net tax revenue. If net tax revenue has not been reduced, this provision does not apply. In the event that actual tax revenue is above the baseline, the organic revenue growth that has occurred, plus any other revenue-raising changes, by definition must have been enough to offset the in-year costs of the covered changes. (4) Consideration of other sources of funding. Next, the recipient government will identify and calculate the total value of changes that could pay for revenue reduction due to covered changes and sum these items. This amount can be used to pay for up to the total value of revenue-reducing changes in the reporting year. These changes consist of two categories: (a) Tax and other increases in revenue. The recipient government must identify and consider covered changes in policy that the recipient government predicts will have the effect of increasing general revenue in a given reporting year. As when identifying and valuing covered changes that reduce tax revenue, the value of revenue-raising changes may be reported based on estimated values produced by a budget model, incorporating reasonable assumptions, aligned with the recipient government’s existing approach for measuring the effects of fiscal policies, and measured relative to a current law baseline, or based on actual values using a statistical methodology to isolate the change in year-over-year revenue attributable to the covered change(s). Further, and as discussed above, estimation approaches should not use dynamic scoring methodologies that incorporate the effects of macroeconomic growth because growth is accounted for separately under the interim final rule. In general and where possible, reporting should be produced by the agency of the recipient government responsible for estimating the costs and effects of fiscal policy changes. This approach offers recipient governments the flexibility to determine their reporting methodology based on their existing budget scoring practices and capabilities. (b) Covered spending cuts. A recipient government also may cut spending in certain areas to pay for covered changes that reduce tax revenue, up to the amount of the recipient government’s net reduction in total spending as described below. These changes must be reductions in government outlays not in an area where the recipient government has spent Fiscal Recovery Funds. To better align with existing reporting and accounting, the interim final rule considers the department, agency, or VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:28 May 14, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\17MYR2.SGM 17MYR2 77 26810 Federal Register /Vol. 86, No. 93/Monday, May 17, 2021/Rules and Regulations 169This cap is applied in §35.8(c) of the interim final rule, calculating the amount of funds used in violation of the tax offset provision. authority from which spending has been cut and whether the recipient government has spent Fiscal Recovery Funds on that same department, agency, or authority. This approach was selected to allow recipient governments to report how Fiscal Recovery Funds have been spent using reporting units already incorporated into their budgeting process. If they have not spent Fiscal Recovery Funds in a department, agency, or authority, the full amount of the reduction in spending counts as a covered spending cut, up to the recipient government’s net reduction in total spending. If they have, the Fiscal Recovery Funds generally would be deemed to have replaced the amount of spending cut and only reductions in spending above the amount of Fiscal Recovery Funds spent on the department, agency, or authority would count. To calculate the amount of spending cuts that are available to offset a reduction in tax revenue, the recipient government must first consider whether there has been a reduction in total net spending, excluding Fiscal Recovery Funds (net reduction in total spending). This approach ensures that reported spending cuts actually create fiscal space, rather than simply offsetting other spending increases. A net reduction in total spending is measured as the difference between total spending in each reporting year, excluding Fiscal Recovery Funds spent, relative to total spending for the recipient’s fiscal year ending in 2019, adjusted for inflation. Measuring reductions in spending relative to 2019 reflects the fact that the fiscal space created by a spending cut persists so long as spending remains below its original level, even if it does not decline further, relative to the same amount of revenue. Measuring spending cuts from year to year would, by contrast, not recognize any available funds to offset revenue reductions unless spending continued to decline, failing to reflect the actual availability of funds created by a persistent change and limiting the discretion of States and territories. In general and where possible, reporting should be produced by the agency of the recipient government responsible for estimating the costs and effects of fiscal policy changes. Treasury chose this approach because while many recipient governments may score budget legislation using projections, spending cuts are readily observable using actual values. This approach—allowing only spending reductions in areas where the recipient government has not spent Fiscal Recovery Funds to be used as an offset for a reduction in net tax revenue—aims to prevent recipient governments from using Fiscal Recovery Funds to supplant State or territory funding in the eligible use areas, and then use those State or territory funds to offset tax cuts. Such an approach helps ensure that Fiscal Recovery Funds are not used to ‘‘indirectly’’ offset revenue reductions due to covered changes. In order to help ensure recipient governments use Fiscal Recovery Funds in a manner consistent with the prescribed eligible uses and do not use Fiscal Recovery Funds to indirectly offset a reduction in net tax revenue resulting from a covered change, Treasury will monitor changes in spending throughout the covered period. If, over the course of the covered period, a spending cut is subsequently replaced with Fiscal Recovery Funds and used to indirectly offset a reduction in net tax revenue resulting from a covered change, Treasury may consider such change to be an evasion of the restrictions of the offset provision and seek recoupment of such amounts. (5) Identification of amounts subject to recoupment. If a recipient government (i) reports covered changes that reduce tax revenue (Step 1); (ii) to a degree greater than the de minimis (Step 2); (iii) has experienced a reduction in net tax revenue (Step 3); and (iv) lacks sufficient revenue from other, permissible sources to pay for the entirety of the reduction (Step 4), then the recipient government will be considered to have used Fiscal Recovery Funds to offset a reduction in net tax revenue, up to the amount that revenue has actually declined. That is, the maximum value of reduction in revenue due to covered changes which a recipient government must cover is capped at the difference between the baseline and actual tax revenue.169 In the event that the baseline is above actual tax revenue and the difference between them is less than the sum of revenue reducing changes that are not paid for with other, permissible sources, organic revenue growth has implicitly offset a portion of the reduction. For example, if a recipient government reduces tax revenue by $1 billion, makes no other changes, and experiences revenue growth driven by organic economic growth worth $500 million, it need only pay for the remaining $500 million with sources other than Fiscal Recovery Funds. The revenue reduction cap implements this approach for permitting organic revenue growth to cover the cost of tax cuts. Finally, as discussed further in Section IV of this SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, a recipient government may request reconsideration of any amounts identified as subject to recoupment under this framework. This process ensures that all relevant facts and circumstances, including information regarding planned spending cuts and budgeting assumptions, are considered prior to a determination that an amount must be repaid. Amounts subject to recoupment are calculated on an annual basis; amounts recouped in one year cannot be returned if the State or territory subsequently reports an increase in net tax revenue. To facilitate the implementation of the framework above, and in addition to reporting required on eligible uses, in each year of the reporting period, each State and territory will report to Treasury the following items: •Actual net tax revenue for the reporting year; •Each revenue-reducing change made to date during the covered period and the in-year value of each change; •Each revenue-raising change made to date during the covered period and the in-year value of each change; •Each covered spending cut made to date during the covered period, the in- year value of each cut, and documentation demonstrating that each spending cut is covered as prescribed under the interim final rule; Treasury will provide additional guidance and instructions the reporting requirements at a later date. Question 28: Does the interim final rule’s definition of tax revenue accord with existing State and territorial practice and, if not, are there other definitions or elements Treasury should consider? Discuss why or why not. Question 29: The interim final rule permits certain spending cuts to cover the costs of reductions in tax revenue, including cuts in a department, agency, or authority in which the recipient government is not using Fiscal Recovery Funds. How should Treasury and recipient governments consider the scope of a department, agency, or authority for the use of funds to ensure spending cuts are not being substituted with Fiscal Recovery Funds while also avoiding an overbroad definition of that captures spending that is, in fact, distinct? Question 30: Discuss the budget scoring methodologies currently used by States and territories. How should the interim final rule take into consideration differences in approaches? Please discuss the use of VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:28 May 14, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\17MYR2.SGM 17MYR2 78 26811 Federal Register /Vol. 86, No. 93/Monday, May 17, 2021/Rules and Regulations 170See 42 CFR 433.51 and 45 CFR 75.306. 171Section 1001 of Division N of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 amended section 601(d)(3) of the Act by extending the end of the covered period for CRF expenditures from December 30, 2020 to December 31, 2021. 172Sections 602(a), 603(a), 602(c)(1) and 603(c)(1) of the Act. 173Given the nature of this program, recipients will not be permitted to use funds to cover pre- award costs, i.e., those incurred prior to March 3, 2021. 174Sections 602(e) and 603(e) of the Act. practices including but not limited to macrodynamic scoring, microdynamic scoring, and length of budget windows. Question 31: If a recipient government has a balanced budget requirement, how will that requirement impact its use of Fiscal Recovery Funds and ability to implement this framework? Question 32: To implement the framework described above, the interim final rule establishes certain reporting requirements. To what extent do recipient governments already produce this information and on what timeline? Discuss ways that Treasury and recipient governments may better rely on information already produced, while ensuring a consistent application of the framework. Question 33: Discuss States’ and territories’ ability to produce the figures and numbers required for reporting under the interim final rule. What additional reporting tools, such as a standardized template, would facilitate States’ and territories’ ability to complete the reporting required under the interim final rule? C. Other Restrictions on Use Payments from the Fiscal Recovery Funds are also subject to pre-existing limitations provided in other Federal statutes and regulations and may not be used as non-Federal match for other Federal programs whose statute or regulations bar the use of Federal funds to meet matching requirements. For example, payments from the Fiscal Recovery Funds may not be used to satisfy the State share of Medicaid.170 As provided for in the award terms, payments from the Fiscal Recovery Funds as a general matter will be subject to the provisions of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR part 200) (the Uniform Guidance), including the cost principles and restrictions on general provisions for selected items of cost. D. Timeline for Use of Fiscal Recovery Funds Section 602(c)(1) and section 603(c)(1) require that payments from the Fiscal Recovery Funds be used only to cover costs incurred by the State, territory, Tribal government, or local government by December 31, 2024. Similarly, the CARES Act provided that payments from the CRF be used to cover costs incurred by December 31, 2021.171 The definition of ‘‘incurred’’ does not have a clear meaning. With respect to the CARES Act, on the understanding that the CRF was intended to be used to meet relatively short-term needs, Treasury interpreted this requirement to mean that, for a cost to be considered to have been incurred, performance of the service or delivery of the goods acquired must occur by December 31, 2021. In contrast, the ARPA, passed at a different stage of the COVID–19 public health emergency, was intended to provide more general fiscal relief over a broader timeline. In addition, the ARPA expressly permits the use of Fiscal Recovery Funds for improvements to water, sewer, and broadband infrastructure, which entail a longer timeframe. In recognition of this, Treasury is interpreting the requirement in section 602 and section 603 that costs be incurred by December 31, 2024, to require only that recipients have obligated the Fiscal Recovery Funds by such date. The interim final rule adopts a definition of ‘‘obligation’’ that is based on the definition used for purposes of the Uniform Guidance, which will allow for uniform administration of this requirement and is a definition with which most recipients will be familiar. Payments from the Fiscal Recovery Funds are grants provided to recipients to mitigate the fiscal effects of the COVID–19 public health emergency and to respond to the public health emergency, consistent with the eligible uses enumerated in sections 602(c)(1) and 603(c)(1).172 As such, these funds are intended to provide economic stimulus in areas still recovering from the economic effects of the pandemic. In implementing and interpreting these provisions, including what it means to ‘‘respond to’’ the COVID–19 public health emergency, Treasury takes into consideration pre-pandemic facts and circumstances (e.g., average revenue growth prior to the pandemic) as well as impact of the pandemic that predate the enactment of the ARPA (e.g., replenishing Unemployment Trust balances drawn during the pandemic). While assessing the effects of the COVID–19 public health emergency necessarily takes into consideration the facts and circumstances that predate the ARPA, use of Fiscal Recovery Funds is forward looking. As discussed above, recipients are permitted to use payments from the Fiscal Recovery Funds to respond to the public health emergency, to respond to workers performing essential work by providing premium pay or providing grants to eligible employers, and to make necessary investments in water, sewer, or broadband infrastructure, which all relate to prospective uses. In addition, sections 602(c)(1)(C) and 603(c)(1)(C) permit recipients to use Fiscal Recovery Funds for the provision of government services. This clause provides that the amount of funds that may be used for this purpose is measured by reference to the reduction in revenue due to the public health emergency relative to revenues collected in the most recent full fiscal year, but this reference does not relate to the period during which recipients may use the funds, which instead refers to prospective uses, consistent with the other eligible uses. Although as discussed above the eligible uses of payments from the Fiscal Recovery Funds are all prospective in nature, Treasury considers the beginning of the covered period for purposes of determining compliance with section 602(c)(2)(A) to be the relevant reference point for this purpose. The interim final rule thus permits funds to be used to cover costs incurred beginning on March 3, 2021. This aligns the period for use of Fiscal Recovery Funds with the period during which these funds may not be used to offset reductions in net tax revenue. Permitting Fiscal Recovery Funds to be used to cover costs incurred beginning on this date will also mean that recipients that began incurring costs in the anticipation of enactment of the ARPA and in advance of the issuance of this rule and receipt of payment from the Fiscal Recovery Funds would be able to cover them using these payments.173 As set forth in the award terms, the period of performance will run until December 31, 2026, which will provide recipients a reasonable amount of time to complete projects funded with payments from the Fiscal Recovery Funds. IV. Recoupment Process Under the ARPA, failure to comply with the restrictions on use contained in sections 602(c) and 603(c) of the Act may result in recoupment of funds.174 The interim final rule implements these provisions by establishing a process for recoupment. Identification and Notice of Violations. Failure to comply with the restrictions on use will be identified based on reporting provided by the VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:28 May 14, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\17MYR2.SGM 17MYR2 79 26812 Federal Register /Vol. 86, No. 93/Monday, May 17, 2021/Rules and Regulations 175The interim final rule also provides that Treasury may extend any deadlines. 176With respect to Federal financial assistance more generally, States are subject to the requirements of the Cash Management Improvement Act (CMIA), under which Federal funds are drawn upon only on an as needed basis and States are required to remit interest on unused balances to Treasury. Given the statutory requirement for Treasury to make payments to States within a certain period, these requirements of the CMIA and Treasury’s implementing regulations at 31 CFR part 205 will not apply to payments from the Fiscal Recovery Funds. Providing funding in two tranches to the majority of States reflects, to the maximum extent permitted by section 602 of the Act, the general principles of Federal cash management and stewardship of Federal funding, yet will be much less restrictive than the usual requirements to which States are subject. 177The potential course of the virus, and its impact on the economy, has contributed to a heightened degree of uncertainty relative to prior periods. See, e.g., Dave Altig et al., Economic uncertainty before and during the COVID–19 pandemic, J. of Public Econ. (Nov. 2020), available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ abs/pii/S0047272720301389. recipient. As discussed further in Sections III.B and VIII of this SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, Treasury will collect information regarding eligible uses on a quarterly basis and on the tax offset provision on an annual basis. Treasury also may consider other information in identifying a violation, such as information provided by members of the public. If Treasury identifies a violation, it will provide written notice to the recipient along with an explanation of such amounts. Request for Reconsideration. Under the interim final rule, a recipient may submit a request for reconsideration of any amounts identified in the notice provided by Treasury. This reconsideration process provides a recipient the opportunity to submit additional information it believes supports its request in light of the notice of recoupment, including, for example, additional information regarding the recipient’s use of Fiscal Recovery Funds or its tax revenues. The process also provides the Secretary with an opportunity to consider all information relevant to whether a violation has occurred, and if so, the appropriate amount for recoupment. The interim final rule also establishes requirements for the timing of a request for reconsideration. Specifically, if a recipient wishes to request reconsideration of any amounts identified in the notice, the recipient must submit a written request for reconsideration to the Secretary within 60 calendar days of receipt of such notice. The request must include an explanation of why the recipient believes that the finding of a violation or recoupable amount identified in the notice of recoupment should be reconsidered. To facilitate the Secretary’s review of a recipient’s request for reconsideration, the request should identify all supporting reasons for the request. Within 60 calendar days of receipt of the recipient’s request for reconsideration, the recipient will be notified of the Secretary’s decision to affirm, withdraw, or modify the notice of recoupment. Such notification will include an explanation of the decision, including responses to the recipient’s supporting reasons and consideration of additional information provided. The process and timeline established by the interim final rule are intended to provide the recipient with an adequate opportunity to fully present any issues or arguments in response to the notice of recoupment.175 This process will allow the Secretary to respond to the issues and considerations raised in the request for reconsideration taking into account the information and arguments presented by the recipient along with any other relevant information. Repayment. Finally, the interim final rule provides that any amounts subject to recoupment must be repaid within 120 calendar days of receipt of any final notice of recoupment or, if the recipient has not requested reconsideration, within 120 calendar days of the initial notice provided by the Secretary. Question 34: Discuss the timeline for requesting reconsideration under the interim final rule. What, if any, challenges does this timeline present? V. Payments in Tranches to Local Governments and Certain States Section 603 of the Act provides that the Secretary will make payments to local governments in two tranches, with the second tranche being paid twelve months after the first payment. In addition, section 602(b)(6)(A)(ii) provides that the Secretary may withhold payment of up to 50 percent of the amount allocated to each State and territory for a period of up to twelve months from the date on which the State or territory provides its certification to the Secretary. Any such withholding for a State or territory is required to be based on the unemployment rate in the State or territory as of the date of the certification. The Secretary has determined to provide in this interim final rule for withholding of 50 percent of the amount of Fiscal Recovery Funds allocated to all States (and the District of Columbia) other than those with an unemployment rate that is 2.0 percentage points or more above its pre-pandemic (i.e., February 2020) level. The Secretary will refer to the latest available monthly data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics as of the date the certification is provided. Based on data available at the time of public release of this interim final rule, this threshold would result in a majority of States being paid in two tranches. Splitting payments for the majority of States is consistent with the requirement in section 603 of the Act to make payments from the Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Fund to local governments in two tranches.176 Splitting payments to States into two tranches will help encourage recipients to adapt, as necessary, to new developments that could arise over the coming twelve months, including potential changes to the nature of the public health emergency and its negative economic impacts. While the U.S. economy has been recovering and adding jobs in aggregate, there is still considerable uncertainty in the economic outlook and the interaction between the pandemic and the economy.177 For these reasons, Treasury believes it will be appropriate for a majority of recipients to adapt their plans as the recovery evolves. For example, a faster-than-expected economic recovery in 2021 could lead a recipient to dedicate more Fiscal Recovery Funds to longer-term investments starting in 2022. In contrast, a slower-than-expected economic recovery in 2021 could lead a recipient to use additional funds for near-term stimulus in 2022. At the same time, the statute contemplates the possibility that elevated unemployment in certain States could justify a single payment. Elevated unemployment is indicative of a greater need to assist unemployed workers and stimulate a faster economic recovery. For this reason, the interim final rule provides that States and territories with an increase in their unemployment rate over a specified threshold may receive a single payment, with the expectation that a single tranche will better enable these States and territories to take additional immediate action to aid the unemployed and strengthen their economies. Following the initial pandemic- related spike in unemployment in 2020, States’ unemployment rates have been trending back towards pre-pandemic levels. However, some States’ labor markets are healing more slowly than others. Moreover, States varied widely in their pre-pandemic levels of unemployment, and some States remain substantially further from their pre- VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:28 May 14, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\17MYR2.SGM 17MYR2 80 26813 Federal Register /Vol. 86, No. 93/Monday, May 17, 2021/Rules and Regulations 178Includes the period during and immediately following recessions, as defined by the National Bureau of Economic Research. National Bureau of Economic Research, US Business Cycle Expansions and Contractions, https://www.nber.org/research/ data/us-business-cycle-expansions-and- contractions (last visited Apr. 27, 2021). Based on data from U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Unemployment Rate [UNRATE], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, https:// fred.stlouisfed.org/series/UNRATE (last visited Apr. 27, 2021). 179U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Economic News Release—Table 1. Civilian labor force and unemployment by state and selected area, seasonally adjusted, https://www.bls.gov/ news.release/laus.t01.htm (last visited Apr. 30, 2021). 180Section 602(c)(3) of the Act. pandemic starting point. Consequently, Treasury is delineating States with significant remaining elevation in the unemployment rate, based on the net difference to pre-pandemic levels. Treasury has established that significant remaining elevation in the unemployment rate is a net change in the unemployment rate of 2.0 percentage points or more relative to pre-pandemic levels. In the four previous recessions going back to the early 1980s, the national unemployment rate rose by 3.6, 2.3, 2.0, and 5.0 percentage points, as measured from the start of the recession to the eventual peak during or immediately following the recession.178 Each of these increases can therefore represent a recession’s impact on unemployment. To identify States with significant remaining elevation in unemployment, Treasury took the lowest of these four increases, 2.0 percentage points, to indicate states where, despite improvement in the unemployment rate, current labor market conditions are consistent still with a historical benchmark for a recession. No U.S. territory will be subject to withholding of its payment from the Fiscal Recovery Funds. For Puerto Rico, the Secretary has determined that the current level of the unemployment rate (8.8 percent, as of March 2021179) is sufficiently high such that Treasury should not withhold any portion of its payment from the Fiscal Recovery Funds regardless of its change in unemployment rate relative to its pre- pandemic level. For U.S. territories that are not included in the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ monthly unemployment rate data, the Secretary will not exercise the authority to withhold amounts from the Fiscal Recovery Funds. VI. Transfer The statute authorizes State, territorial, and Tribal governments; counties; metropolitan cities; and nonentitlement units of local government (counties, metropolitan cities, and nonentitlement units of local government are collectively referred to as ‘‘local governments’’) to transfer amounts paid from the Fiscal Recovery Funds to a number of specified entities. By permitting these transfers, Congress recognized the importance of providing flexibility to governments seeking to achieve the greatest impact with their funds, including by working with other levels or units of government or private entities to assist recipient governments in carrying out their programs. This includes special-purpose districts that perform specific functions in the community, such as fire, water, sewer, or mosquito abatement districts. Specifically, under section 602(c)(3), a State, territory, or Tribal government may transfer funds to a ‘‘private nonprofit organization . . . a Tribal organization . . . a public benefit corporation involved in the transportation of passengers or cargo, or a special-purpose unit of State or local government.’’180 Similarly, section 603(c)(3) authorizes a local government to transfer funds to the same entities (other than Tribal organizations). The interim final rule clarifies that the lists of transferees in sections 602(c)(3) and 603(c)(3) are not exclusive. The interim final rule permits State, territorial, and Tribal governments to transfer Fiscal Recovery Funds to other constituent units of government or private entities beyond those specified in the statute. Similarly, local governments are authorized to transfer Fiscal Recovery Funds to other constituent units of government (e.g., a county is able to transfer Fiscal Recovery Funds to a city, town, or school district within it) or to private entities. This approach is intended to help provide funding to local governments with needs that may exceed the allocation provided under the statutory formula. State, local, territorial, and Tribal governments that receive a Federal award directly from a Federal awarding agency, such as Treasury, are ‘‘recipients.’’ A transferee receiving a transfer from a recipient under sections 602(c)(3) and 603(c)(3) will be a subrecipient. Subrecipients are entities that receive a subaward from a recipient to carry out a program or project on behalf of the recipient with the recipient’s Federal award funding. The recipient remains responsible for monitoring and overseeing the subrecipient’s use of Fiscal Recovery Funds and other activities related to the award to ensure that the subrecipient complies with the statutory and regulatory requirements and the terms and conditions of the award. Recipients also remain responsible for reporting to Treasury on their subrecipients’ use of payments from the Fiscal Recovery Funds for the duration of the award. Transfers under sections 602(c)(3) and 603(c)(3) must qualify as an eligible use of Fiscal Recovery Funds by the transferor. Once Fiscal Recovery Funds are received, the transferee must abide by the restrictions on use applicable to the transferor under the ARPA and other applicable law and program guidance. For example, if a county transferred Fiscal Recovery Funds to a town within its borders to respond to the COVID–19 public health emergency, the town would be bound by the eligible use requirements applicable to the county in carrying out the county’s goal. This also means that county A may not transfer Fiscal Recovery Funds to county B for use in county B because such a transfer would not, from the perspective of the transferor (county A), be an eligible use in county A. Section 603(c)(4) separately provides for transfers by a local government to its State or territory. A transfer under section 603(c)(4) will not make the State a subrecipient of the local government, and such Fiscal Recovery Funds may be used by the State for any purpose permitted under section 602(c). A transfer under section 603(c)(4) will result in a cancellation or termination of the award on the part of the transferor local government and a modification of the award to the transferee State or territory. The transferor must provide notice of the transfer to Treasury in a format specified by Treasury. If the local government does not provide such notice, it will remain legally obligated to Treasury under the award and remain responsible for ensuring that the awarded Fiscal Recovery Funds are being used in accordance with the statute and program guidance and for reporting on such uses to Treasury. A State that receives a transfer from a local government under section 603(c)(4) will be bound by all of the use restrictions set forth in section 602(c) with respect to the use of those Fiscal Recovery Funds, including the prohibitions on use of such Fiscal Recovery Funds to offset certain reductions in taxes or to make deposits into pension funds. Question 35: What are the advantages and disadvantages of treating the list of transferees in sections 602(c)(3) and 603(c)(3) as nonexclusive, allowing States and localities to transfer funds to entities outside of the list? Question 36: Are there alternative ways of defining ‘‘special-purpose unit of State or local government’’ and VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:28 May 14, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\17MYR2.SGM 17MYR2 81 26814 Federal Register /Vol. 86, No. 93/Monday, May 17, 2021/Rules and Regulations ‘‘public benefit corporation’’ that would better further the aims of the Funds? VII. Nonentitlement Units of Government The Fiscal Recovery Funds provides for $19.53 billion in payments to be made to States and territories which will distribute the funds to nonentitlement units of local government (NEUs); local governments which generally have populations below 50,000. These local governments have not yet received direct fiscal relief from the Federal Government during the COVID–19 public health emergency, making Fiscal Recovery Funds payments an important source of support for their public health and economic responses. Section 603 requires Treasury to allocate and pay Fiscal Recovery Funds to the States and territories and requires the States and territories to distribute Fiscal Recovery Funds to NEUs based on population within 30 days of receipt unless an extension is granted by the Secretary. The interim final rule clarifies certain aspects regarding the distribution of Fiscal Recovery by States and territories to NEUs, as well as requirements around timely payments from the Fiscal Recovery Funds. The ARPA requires that States and territories allocate funding to NEUs in an amount that bears the same proportion as the population of the NEU bears to the total population of all NEUs in the State or territory, subject to a cap (described below). Because the statute requires States and territories to make distributions based on population, States and territories may not place additional conditions or requirements on distributions to NEUs, beyond those required by the ARPA and Treasury’s implementing regulations and guidance. For example, a State may not impose stricter limitations than permitted by statute or Treasury regulations or guidance on an NEU’s use of Fiscal Recovery Funds based on the NEU’s proposed spending plan or other policies. States and territories are also not permitted to offset any debt owed by the NEU against the NEU’s distribution. Further, States and territories may not provide funding on a reimbursement basis—e.g., requiring NEUs to pay for project costs up front before being reimbursed with Fiscal Recovery Funds payments—because this funding model would not comport with the statutory requirement that States and territories make distributions to NEUs within the statutory timeframe. Similarly, States and territories distributing Fiscal Recovery Funds payments to NEUs are responsible for complying with the Fiscal Recovery Funds statutory requirement that distributions to NEUs not exceed 75 percent of the NEU’s most recent budget. The most recent budget is defined as the NEU’s most recent annual total operating budget, including its general fund and other funds, as of January 27, 2020. Amounts in excess of such cap and therefore not distributed to the NEU must be returned to Treasury by the State or territory. States and territories may rely for this determination on a certified top-line budget total from the NEU. Under the interim final rule, the total allocation and distribution to an NEU, including the sum of both the first and second tranches of funding, cannot exceed the 75 percent cap. States and territories must permit NEUs without formal budgets as of January 27, 2020 to self-certify their most recent annual expenditures as of January 27, 2020 for the purpose of calculating the cap. This approach will provide an administrable means to implement the cap for small local governments that do not adopt a formal budget. Section 603(b)(3) of the Social Security Act provides for Treasury to make payments to counties but provides that, in the case of an amount to be paid to a county that is not a unit of general local government, the amount shall instead be paid to the State in which such county is located, and such State shall distribute such amount to each unit of general local government within such county in an amount that bears the same proportion to the amount to be paid to such county as the population of such units of general local government bears to the total population of such county. As with NEUs, States may not place additional conditions or requirements on distributions to such units of general local government, beyond those required by the ARPA and Treasury’s implementing regulations and guidance. In the case of consolidated governments, section 603(b)(4) allows consolidated governments (e.g., a city- county consolidated government) to receive payments under each allocation based on the respective formulas. In the case of a consolidated government, Treasury interprets the budget cap to apply to the consolidated government’s NEU allocation under section 603(b)(2) but not to the consolidated government’s county allocation under section 603(b)(3). If necessary, States and territories may use the Fiscal Recovery Funds under section 602(c)(1)(A) to fund expenses related to administering payments to NEUs and units of general local government, as disbursing these funds itself is a response to the public health emergency and its negative economic impacts. If a State or territory requires more time to disburse Fiscal Recovery Funds to NEUs than the allotted 30 days, Treasury will grant extensions of not more than 30 days for States and territories that submit a certification in writing in accordance with section 603(b)(2)(C)(ii)(I). Additional extensions may be granted at the discretion of the Secretary. Question 37: What are alternative ways for States and territories to enforce the 75 percent cap while reducing the administrative burden on them? Question 38: What criteria should Treasury consider in assessing requests for extensions for further time to distribute NEU payments? VIII. Reporting States (defined to include the District of Columbia), territories, metropolitan cities, counties, and Tribal governments will be required to submit one interim report and thereafter quarterly Project and Expenditure reports through the end of the award period on December 31, 2026. The interim report will include a recipient’s expenditures by category at the summary level from the date of award to July 31, 2021 and, for States and territories, information related to distributions to nonentitlement units. Recipients must submit their interim report to Treasury by August 31, 2021. Nonentitlement units of local government are not required to submit an interim report. The quarterly Project and Expenditure reports will include financial data, information on contracts and subawards over $50,000, types of projects funded, and other information regarding a recipient’s utilization of the award funds. The reports will include the same general data (e.g., on obligations, expenditures, contracts, grants, and sub- awards) as those submitted by recipients of the CRF, with some modifications. Modifications will include updates to the expenditure categories and the addition of data elements related to specific eligible uses, including some of the reporting elements described in sections above. The initial quarterly Project and Expenditure report will cover two calendar quarters from the date of award to September 30, 2021, and must be submitted to Treasury by October 31, 2021. The subsequent quarterly reports will cover one calendar quarter and must be submitted to Treasury within 30 days after the end of each calendar quarter. Nonentitlement units of local government will be required to submit VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:28 May 14, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\17MYR2.SGM 17MYR2 82 26815 Federal Register /Vol. 86, No. 93/Monday, May 17, 2021/Rules and Regulations 1815 U.S.C. 553(a)(2). 1825 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B); see also 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) (creating an exception to the requirement of a 30-day delay before the effective date of a rule ‘‘for good cause found and published with the rule’’). annual Project and Expenditure reports until the end of the award period on December 31, 2026. The initial annual Project and Expenditure report for nonentitlement units of local government will cover activity from the date of award to September 30, 2021 and must be submitted to Treasury by October 31, 2021. The subsequent annual reports must be submitted to Treasury by October 31 each year. States, territories, metropolitan cities, and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents will also be required to submit an annual Recovery Plan Performance report to Treasury. The Recovery Plan Performance report will provide the public and Treasury information on the projects that recipients are undertaking with program funding and how they are planning to ensure project outcomes are achieved in an effective, efficient, and equitable manner. Each jurisdiction will have some flexibility in terms of the form and content of the Recovery Plan Performance report, as long as it includes the minimum information required by Treasury. The Recovery Plan Performance report will include key performance indicators identified by the recipient and some mandatory indicators identified by Treasury, as well as programmatic data in specific eligible use categories and the specific reporting requirements described in the sections above. The initial Recovery Plan Performance report will cover the period from the date of award to July 31, 2021 and must be submitted to Treasury by August 31, 2021. Thereafter, Recovery Plan Performance reports will cover a 12-month period, and recipients will be required to submit the report to Treasury within 30 days after the end of the 12-month period. The second Recovery Plan Performance report will cover the period from July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022, and must be submitted to Treasury by July 31, 2022. Each annual Recovery Plan Performance report must be posted on the public-facing website of the recipient. Local governments with fewer than 250,000 residents, Tribal governments, and nonentitlement units of local government are not required to develop a Recovery Plan Performance report. Treasury will provide additional guidance and instructions on the reporting requirements outlined above for the Fiscal Recovery Funds at a later date. IX. Comments and Effective Date This interim final rule is being issued without advance notice and public comment to allow for immediate implementation of this program. As discussed below, the requirements of advance notice and public comment do not apply ‘‘to the extent that there is involved . . . a matter relating to agency . . . grants.’’ 181 The interim final rule implements statutory conditions on the eligible uses of the Fiscal Recovery Funds grants, and addresses the payment of those funds, the reporting on uses of funds, and potential consequences of ineligible uses. In addition and as discussed below, the Administrative Procedure Act also provides an exception to ordinary notice-and-comment procedures ‘‘when the agency for good cause finds (and incorporates the finding and a brief statement of reasons therefor in the rules issued) that notice and public procedure thereon are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.’’182 This good cause justification also supports waiver of the 60-day delayed effective date for major rules under the Congressional Review Act at 5 U.S.C. 808(2). Although this interim final rule is effective immediately, comments are solicited from interested members of the public and from recipient governments on all aspects of the interim final rule. These comments must be submitted on or before July 16, 2021. X. Regulatory Analyses Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 This interim final rule is economically significant for the purposes of Executive Orders 12866 and 13563. Treasury, however, is proceeding under the emergency provision at Executive Order 12866 section 6(a)(3)(D) based on the need to act expeditiously to mitigate the current economic conditions arising from the COVID–19 public health emergency. The rule has been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in accordance with Executive Order 12866. This rule is necessary to implement the ARPA in order to provide economic relief to State, local, and Tribal governments adversely impacted by the COVID–19 public health emergency. Under Executive Order 12866, OMB must determine whether this regulatory action is ‘‘significant’’ and, therefore, subject to the requirements of the Executive Order and subject to review by OMB. Section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 defines a significant regulatory action as an action likely to result in a rule that may: (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more, or adversely affect a sector of the economy; productivity; competition; jobs; the environment; public health or safety; or State, local, or Tribal governments or communities in a material way (also referred to as ‘‘economically significant’’ regulations); (2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency; (3) Materially alter the budgetary impacts of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President’s priorities, or the principles stated in the Executive order. This regulatory action is an economically significant regulatory action subject to review by OMB under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866. Treasury has also reviewed these regulations under Executive Order 13563, which supplements and explicitly reaffirms the principles, structures, and definitions governing regulatory review established in Executive Order 12866. To the extent permitted by law, section 1(b) of Executive Order 13563 requires that an agency: (1) Propose or adopt regulations only upon a reasoned determination that their benefits justify their costs (recognizing that some benefits and costs are difficult to quantify); (2) Tailor its regulations to impose the least burden on society, consistent with obtaining regulatory objectives taking into account, among other things, and to the extent practicable, the costs of cumulative regulations; (3) Select, in choosing among alternative regulatory approaches, those approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other advantages; distributive impacts; and equity); (4) To the extent feasible, specify performance objectives, rather than the behavior or manner of compliance a regulated entity must adopt; and (5) Identify and assess available alternatives to direct regulation, including providing economic incentives—such as user fees or marketable permits—to encourage the desired behavior, or providing information that enables the public to make choices. Executive Order 13563 also requires an agency ‘‘to use the best available VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:28 May 14, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\17MYR2.SGM 17MYR2 83 26816 Federal Register /Vol. 86, No. 93/Monday, May 17, 2021/Rules and Regulations 183Gabriel Chodorow-Reich et al., Does State Fiscal Relief during Recessions Increase Employment? Evidence from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, American Econ. J.: Econ. Policy, 4:3 118–45 (Aug. 2012), available at https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/ pol.4.3.118. 184See, e.g., Fitzpatrick, Haughwout & Setren, Fiscal Drag from the State and Local Sector?, Liberty Street Economics Blog, Federal Reserve Bank of New York (June 27, 2012), https:// www.libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2012/ 06/fiscal-drag-from-the-state-and-local-sector.html; Jiri Jonas, Great Recession and Fiscal Squeeze at U.S. Subnational Government Level, IMF Working Paper 12/184, (July 2012), available at https:// www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2012/ wp12184.pdf; Gordon, supra note 9. techniques to quantify anticipated present and future benefits and costs as accurately as possible.’’ OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) has emphasized that these techniques may include ‘‘identifying changing future compliance costs that might result from technological innovation or anticipated behavioral changes.’’ Treasury has assessed the potential costs and benefits, both quantitative and qualitative, of this regulatory action, and is issuing this interim final rule only on a reasoned determination that the benefits exceed the costs. In choosing among alternative regulatory approaches, Treasury selected those approaches that would maximize net benefits. Based on the analysis that follows and the reasons stated elsewhere in this document, Treasury believes that this interim final rule is consistent with the principles set forth in Executive Order 13563. Treasury also has determined that this regulatory action does not unduly interfere with States, territories, Tribal governments, and localities in the exercise of their governmental functions. This Regulatory Impact Analysis discusses the need for regulatory action, the potential benefits, and the potential costs. Need for Regulatory Action. This interim final rule implements the $350 billion Fiscal Recovery Funds of the ARPA, which Congress passed to help States, territories, Tribal governments, and localities respond to the ongoing COVID–19 public health emergency and its economic impacts. As the agency charged with execution of these programs, Treasury has concluded that this interim final rule is needed to ensure that recipients of Fiscal Recovery Funds fully understand the requirements and parameters of the program as set forth in the statute and deploy funds in a manner that best reflects Congress’ mandate for targeted fiscal relief. This interim final rule is primarily a transfer rule: It transfers $350 billion in aid from the Federal Government to states, territories, Tribal governments, and localities, generating a significant macroeconomic effect on the U.S. economy. In making this transfer, Treasury has sought to implement the program in ways that maximize its potential benefits while minimizing its costs. It has done so by aiming to target relief in key areas according to the congressional mandate; offering clarity to States, territories, Tribal governments, and localities while maintaining their flexibility to respond to local needs; and limiting administrative burdens. Analysis of Benefits. Relative to a pre- statutory baseline, the Fiscal Recovery Funds provide a combined $350 billion to State, local, and Tribal governments for fiscal relief and support for costs incurred responding to the COVID–19 pandemic. Treasury believes that this transfer will generate substantial additional economic activity, although given the flexibility accorded to recipients in the use of funds, it is not possible to precisely estimate the extent to which this will occur and the timing with which it will occur. Economic research has demonstrated that state fiscal relief is an efficient and effective way to mitigate declines in jobs and output during an economic downturn.183 Absent such fiscal relief, fiscal austerity among State, local, and Tribal governments could exert a prolonged drag on the overall economic recovery, as occurred following the 2007–09 recession.184 This interim final rule provides benefits across several areas by implementing the four eligible funding uses, as defined in statute: Strengthening the response to the COVID–19 public health emergency and its economic impacts; easing fiscal pressure on State, local, and Tribal governments that might otherwise lead to harmful cutbacks in employment or government services; providing premium pay to essential workers; and making necessary investments in certain types of infrastructure. In implementing the ARPA, Treasury also sought to support disadvantaged communities that have been disproportionately impacted by the pandemic. The Fiscal Recovery Funds as implemented by the interim final rule can be expected to channel resources toward these uses in order to achieve substantial near-term economic and public health benefits, as well as longer-term benefits arising from the allowable investments in water, sewer, and broadband infrastructure and aid to families. These benefits are achieved in the interim final rule through a broadly flexible approach that sets clear guidelines on eligible uses of Fiscal Recovery Funds and provides State, local, and Tribal government officials discretion within those eligible uses to direct Fiscal Recovery Funds to areas of greatest need within their jurisdiction. While preserving recipients’ overall flexibility, the interim final rule includes several provisions that implement statutory requirements and will help support use of Fiscal Recovery Funds to achieve the intended benefits. The remainder of this section clarifies how Treasury’s approach to key provisions in the interim final rule will contribute to greater realization of benefits from the program. •Revenue Loss: Recipients will compute the extent of reduction in revenue by comparing actual revenue to a counterfactual trend representing what could have plausibly been expected to occur in the absence of the pandemic. The counterfactual trend begins with the last full fiscal year prior to the public health emergency (as required by statute) and projects forward with an annualized growth adjustment. Treasury’s decision to incorporate a growth adjustment into the calculation of revenue loss ensures that the formula more fully captures revenue shortfalls relative to recipients’ pre-pandemic expectations. Moreover, recipients will have the opportunity to re-calculate revenue loss at several points throughout the program, recognizing that some recipients may experience revenue effects with a lag. This option to re-calculate revenue loss on an ongoing basis should result in more support for recipients to avoid harmful cutbacks in future years. In calculating revenue loss, recipients will look at general revenue in the aggregate, rather than on a source-by-source basis. Given that recipients may have experienced offsetting changes in revenues across sources, Treasury’s approach provides a more accurate representation of the effect of the pandemic on overall revenues. •Premium Pay: Per the statute, recipients have broad latitude to designate critical infrastructure sectors and make grants to third-party employers for the purpose of providing premium pay or otherwise respond to essential workers. While the interim final rule generally preserves the flexibility in the statute, it does add a requirement that recipients give written justification in the case that premium pay would increase a worker’s annual pay above a certain threshold. To set this threshold, Treasury analyzed data VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:28 May 14, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\17MYR2.SGM 17MYR2 84 26817 Federal Register /Vol. 86, No. 93/Monday, May 17, 2021/Rules and Regulations 185Executive Order on Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities through the Federal Government (Jan. 20, 2021) (86 FR 7009, January 25, 2021), https://www.whitehouse.gov/ briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/01/20/ executive-order-advancing-racial-equity-and- support-for-underserved-communities-through-the- federal-government/ (last visited May 9, 2021). 186David Cooper, Mary Gable & Algernon Austin, Economic Policy Institute Briefing Paper, The Public-Sector Jobs Crisis: Women and African Americans hit hardest by job losses in state and local governments, https://www.epi.org/ publication/bp339-public-sector-jobs-crisis (last visited May 9, 2021). from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to determine a level that would not require further justification for premium pay to the vast majority of essential workers, while requiring higher scrutiny for provision of premium pay to higher- earners who, even without premium pay, would likely have greater personal financial resources to cope with the effects of the pandemic. Treasury believes the threshold in the interim final rule strikes the appropriate balance between preserving flexibility and helping encourage use of these resources to help those in greatest need. The interim final rule also requires that eligible workers have regular in-person interactions or regular physical handling of items that were also handled by others. This requirement will also help encourage use of financial resources for those who have endured the heightened risk of performing essential work. •Withholding of Payments to Recipients: Treasury believes that for the vast majority of recipient entities, it will be appropriate to receive funds in two separate payments. As discussed above, withholding of payments ensures that recipients can adapt spending plans to evolving economic conditions and that at least some of the economic benefits will be realized in 2022 or later. However, consistent with authorities granted to Treasury in the statute, Treasury recognizes that a subset of States with significant remaining elevation in the unemployment rate could face heightened additional near- term needs to aid unemployed workers and stimulate the recovery. Therefore, for a subset of State governments, Treasury will not withhold any funds from the first payment. Treasury believes that this approach strikes the appropriate balance between the general reasons to provide funds in two payments and the heightened additional near-term needs in specific States. As discussed above, Treasury set a threshold based on historical analysis of unemployment rates in recessions. •Hiring Public Sector Employees: The interim final rule states explicitly that recipients may use funds to restore their workforces up to pre-pandemic levels. Treasury believes that this statement is beneficial because it eliminates any uncertainty that could cause delays or otherwise negatively impact restoring public sector workforces (which, at time of publication, remain significantly below pre-pandemic levels). Finally, the interim final rule aims to promote and streamline the provision of assistance to individuals and communities in greatest need, particularly communities that have been historically disadvantaged and have experienced disproportionate impacts of the COVID–19 crisis. Targeting relief is in line with Executive Order 13985, ‘‘Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities Through the Federal Government,’’ which laid out an Administration-wide priority to support ‘‘equity for all, including people of color and others who have been historically underserved, marginalized, and adversely affected by persistent poverty and inequality.’’185 To this end, the interim final rule enumerates a list of services that may be provided using Fiscal Recovery Funds in low-income areas to address the disproportionate impacts of the pandemic in these communities; establishes the characteristics of essential workers eligible for premium pay and encouragement to serve workers based on financial need; provides that recipients may use Fiscal Recovery Funds to restore (to pre-pandemic levels) state and local workforces, where women and people of color are disproportionately represented;186 and targets investments in broadband infrastructure to unserved and underserved areas. Collectively, these provisions will promote use of resources to facilitate the provision of assistance to individuals and communities with the greatest need. Analysis of Costs. This regulatory action will generate administrative costs relative to a pre-statutory baseline. This includes, chiefly, costs required to administer Fiscal Recovery Funds, oversee subrecipients and beneficiaries, and file periodic reports with Treasury. It also requires States to allocate Fiscal Recovery Funds to nonentitlement units, which are smaller units of local government that are statutorily required to receive their funds through States. Treasury expects that the administrative burden associated with this program will be moderate for a grant program of its size. Treasury expects that most recipients receive direct or indirect funding from Federal Government programs and that many have familiarity with how to administer and report on Federal funds or grant funding provided by other entities. In particular, States, territories, and large localities will have received funds from the CRF and Treasury expects them to rely heavily on established processes developed last year or through prior grant funding, mitigating burden on these governments. Treasury expects to provide technical assistance to defray the costs of administration of Fiscal Recovery Funds to further mitigate burden. In making implementation choices, Treasury has hosted numerous consultations with a diverse range of direct recipients— States, small cities, counties, and Tribal governments—along with various communities across the United States, including those that are underserved. Treasury lacks data to estimate the precise extent to which this interim final rule generates administrative burden for State, local, and Tribal governments, but seeks comment to better estimate and account for these costs, as well as on ways to lessen administrative burdens. Executive Order 13132 Executive Order 13132 (entitled Federalism) prohibits an agency from publishing any rule that has federalism implications if the rule either imposes substantial, direct compliance costs on State, local, and Tribal governments, and is not required by statute, or preempts state law, unless the agency meets the consultation and funding requirements of section 6 of the Executive order. This interim final rule does not have federalism implications within the meaning of the Executive order and does not impose substantial, direct compliance costs on State, local, and Tribal governments or preempt state law within the meaning of the Executive order. The compliance costs are imposed on State, local, and Tribal governments by sections 602 and 603 of the Social Security Act, as enacted by the ARPA. Notwithstanding the above, Treasury has engaged in efforts to consult and work cooperatively with affected State, local, and Tribal government officials and associations in the process of developing the interim final rule. Pursuant to the requirements set forth in section 8(a) of Executive Order 13132, Treasury certifies that it has complied with the requirements of Executive Order 13132. Administrative Procedure Act The Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. 551 et seq., generally requires public notice and an opportunity for comment before a rule VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:28 May 14, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\17MYR2.SGM 17MYR2 85 26818 Federal Register /Vol. 86, No. 93/Monday, May 17, 2021/Rules and Regulations becomes effective. However, the APA provides that the requirements of 5 U.S.C. 553 do not apply ‘‘to the extent that there is involved . . . a matter relating to agency . . . grants.’’ The interim final rule implements statutory conditions on the eligible uses of the Fiscal Recovery Funds grants, and addresses the payment of those funds, the reporting on uses of funds, and potential consequences of ineligible uses. The rule is thus ‘‘both clearly and directly related to a federal grant program.’’ National Wildlife Federation v. Snow, 561 F.2d 227, 232 (D.C. Cir. 1976). The rule sets forth the ‘‘process necessary to maintain state . . . eligibility for federal funds,’’ id., as well as the ‘‘method[s] by which states can . . . qualify for federal aid,’’ and other ‘‘integral part[s] of the grant program,’’ Center for Auto Safety v. Tiemann, 414 F. Supp. 215, 222 (D.D.C. 1976). As a result, the requirements of 5 U.S.C. 553 do not apply. The APA also provides an exception to ordinary notice-and-comment procedures ‘‘when the agency for good cause finds (and incorporates the finding and a brief statement of reasons therefor in the rules issued) that notice and public procedure thereon are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.’’ 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B); see also 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) (creating an exception to the requirement of a 30-day delay before the effective date of a rule ‘‘for good cause found and published with the rule’’). Assuming 5 U.S.C. 553 applied, Treasury would still have good cause under sections 553(b)(3)(B) and 553(d)(3) for not undertaking section 553’s requirements. The ARPA is a law responding to a historic economic and public health emergency; it is ‘‘extraordinary’’ legislation about which ‘‘both Congress and the President articulated a profound sense of ‘urgency.’’’ Petry v. Block, 737 F.2d 1193, 1200 (D.C. Cir. 1984). Indeed, several provisions implemented by this interim final rule (sections 602(c)(1)(A) and 603(c)(1)(A)) explicitly provide funds to ‘‘respond to the public health emergency,’’ and the urgency is further exemplified by Congress’s command (in sections 602(b)(6)(B) and 603(b)(7)(A)) that, ‘‘[t]o the extent practicable,’’ funds must be provided to Tribes and cities ‘‘not later than 60 days after the date of enactment.’’ See Philadelphia Citizens in Action v. Schweiker, 669 F.2d 877, 884 (3d Cir. 1982) (finding good cause under circumstances, including statutory time limits, where APA procedures would have been ‘‘virtually impossible’’). Finally, there is an urgent need for States to undertake the planning necessary for sound fiscal policymaking, which requires an understanding of how funds provided under the ARPA will augment and interact with existing budgetary resources and tax policies. Treasury understands that many states require immediate rules on which they can rely, especially in light of the fact that the ARPA ‘‘covered period’’ began on March 3, 2021. The statutory urgency and practical necessity are good cause to forego the ordinary requirements of notice-and-comment rulemaking. Congressional Review Act The Administrator of OIRA has determined that this is a major rule for purposes of Subtitle E of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement and Fairness Act of 1996 (also known as the Congressional Review Act or CRA) (5 U.S.C. 804(2) et seq.). Under the CRA, a major rule takes effect 60 days after the rule is published in the Federal Register. 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(3). Notwithstanding this requirement, the CRA allows agencies to dispense with the requirements of section 801 when the agency for good cause finds that such procedure would be impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest and the rule shall take effect at such time as the agency promulgating the rule determines. 5 U.S.C. 808(2). Pursuant to section 808(2), for the reasons discussed above, Treasury for good cause finds that a 60-day delay to provide public notice is impracticable and contrary to the public interest. Paperwork Reduction Act The information collections associated with State, territory, local, and Tribal government applications materials necessary to receive Fiscal Recovery Funds (e.g., payment information collection and acceptance of award terms) have been reviewed and approved by OMB pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35) (PRA) emergency processing procedures and assigned control number 1505–0271. The information collections related to ongoing reporting requirements, as discussed in this interim final rule, will be submitted to OMB for emergency processing in the near future. Under the PRA, an agency may not conduct or sponsor and a respondent is not required to respond to, an information collection unless it displays a valid OMB control number. Estimates of hourly burden under this program are set forth in the table below. Burden estimates below are preliminary. Reporting Number of respondents (estimated) Number of responses per respondent Total responses Hours per response Total burden in hours Cost to respondent ($48.80 per hour*) Recipient Payment Form .....................5,050 1 .....................5,050 .25 (15 minutes) ...1,262.5 $61,610 Acceptance of Award Terms ...............5,050 1 .....................5,050 .25 (15 minutes) ...1,262.5 61,610 Title VI Assurances .............................5,050 1 .....................5,050 .50 (30 minutes) ...2,525 123,220 Quarterly Project and Expenditure Re- port. 5,050 4*** ................. 20,200 25 ......................... 505,000 24,644,000 Annual Project and Expenditure Re- port from NEUs. TBD 1 per year ....... †20,000–40,000 15 ......................... 300,000–600,000 14,640,000–29,280,000 Annual Recovery Plan Performance report. 418 1 per year ....... 418 100 ....................... 41,800 2,039,840 Total ..............................................(**) N/A ................. 55,768–75,768 141 ....................... 851,850–1,151,850 41,570,280–56,210,280 *Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Outlook Handbook, Accountants and Auditors, on the internet at https://www.bls.gov/ooh/busi- ness-and-financial/accountants-and-auditors.htm (visited March 28, 2020). Base wage of $33.89/hour increased by 44 percent to account for fully loaded employer cost of employee compensation (benefits, etc.) for a fully loaded wage rate of $48.80. **5,050–TBD. ***Per year after first year. †(Estimate only). Periodic reporting is required by section 602(c) of Section VI of the Social Security Act and under the interim final rule. As discussed in Section VIII of this SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, recipients of Fiscal Recovery Funds will be required to submit one interim report and thereafter quarterly Project and Expenditure reports until the end of the award period. Recipients must submit interim reports to Treasury by August VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:28 May 14, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\17MYR2.SGM 17MYR2 86 26819 Federal Register /Vol. 86, No. 93/Monday, May 17, 2021/Rules and Regulations 31, 2021. The quarterly Project and Expenditure reports will include financial data, information on contracts and subawards over $50,000, types of projects funded, and other information regarding a recipient’s utilization of the award funds. Nonentitlement unit recipients will be required to submit annual Project and Expenditure reports until the end of the award period. The initial annual Project and Expenditure report for Nonentitlement unit recipients must be submitted to Treasury by October 31, 2021. The subsequent annual reports must be submitted to Treasury by October 31 each year. States, territories, metropolitan cities, and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents will also be required to submit an annual Recovery Plan Performance report to Treasury. The Recovery Plan Performance report will include descriptions of the projects funded and information on the performance indicators and objectives of the award. Each annual Recovery Plan Performance report must be posted on the public- facing website of the recipient. Treasury will provide additional guidance and instructions on the all the reporting requirements outlined above for the Fiscal Recovery Funds program at a later date. These and related periodic reporting requirements are under consideration and will be submitted to OMB for approval under the PRA emergency provisions in the near future. Treasury invites comments on all aspects of the reporting and recordkeeping requirements including: (a) Whether the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information has practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the estimate of the burden of the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information; and (e) estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information. Comments should be sent by the comment deadline to the www.regulations.gov docket with a copy to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, U.S. Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20503; or email to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requires that when an agency issues a proposed rule, or a final rule pursuant to section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act or another law, the agency must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis that meets the requirements of the RFA and publish such analysis in the Federal Register. 5 U.S.C. 603, 604. Rules that are exempt from notice and comment under the APA are also exempt from the RFA requirements, including the requirement to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis, when among other things the agency for good cause finds that notice and public procedure are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest. Since this rule is exempt from the notice and comment requirements of the APA, Treasury is not required to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis. List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 35 Executive compensation, Public health emergency, State and local governments, Tribal governments. For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Department of the Treasury amends 31 CFR part 35 as follows: PART 35—PANDEMIC RELIEF PROGRAMS ■1. The authority citation for part 35 is revised to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 802(f); 42 U.S.C. 803(f); 31 U.S.C. 321; Division N, Title V, Subtitle B, Pub. L. 116–260, 134 Stat. 1182; Section 104A, Pub. L. 103–325, 108 Stat. 2160, as amended (12 U.S.C. 4701 et seq.); Pub. L. 117–2, 135 Stat. 4 (42 U.S.C. 802 et seq.). ■2. Revise the part heading to read as set forth above. ■3. Add subpart A to read as follows: Subpart A—Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Sec. 35.1 Purpose. 35.2 Applicability. 35.3 Definitions. 35.4 Reservation of authority, reporting. 35.5 Use of funds. 35.6 Eligible uses. 35.7 Pensions. 35.8 Tax. 35.9 Compliance with applicable laws. 35.10 Recoupment. 35.11 Payments to States. 35.12 Distributions to nonentitlement units of local government and units of general local government. §35.1 Purpose. This subpart implements section 9901 of the American Rescue Plan Act (Subtitle M of Title IX of Pub. L. 117–2), which amends Title VI of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) by adding sections 602 and 603 to establish the Coronavirus State Fiscal Recovery Fund and Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Fund. §35.2 Applicability. This subpart applies to States, territories, Tribal governments, metropolitan cities, nonentitlement units of local government, counties, and units of general local government that accept a payment or transfer of funds made under section 602 or 603 of the Social Security Act. §35.3 Definitions. As used in this subpart: Baseline means tax revenue of the recipient for its fiscal year ending in 2019, adjusted for inflation in each reporting year using the Bureau of Economic Analysis’s Implicit Price Deflator for the gross domestic product of the United States. County means a county, parish, or other equivalent county division (as defined by the Census Bureau). Covered benefits include, but are not limited to, the costs of all types of leave (vacation, family-related, sick, military, bereavement, sabbatical, jury duty), employee insurance (health, life, dental, vision), retirement (pensions, 401(k)), unemployment benefit plans (Federal and State), workers’ compensation insurance, and Federal Insurance Contributions Act taxes (which includes Social Security and Medicare taxes). Covered change means a change in law, regulation, or administrative interpretation. A change in law includes any final legislative or regulatory action, a new or changed administrative interpretation, and the phase-in or taking effect of any statute or rule if the phase-in or taking effect was not prescribed prior to the start of the covered period. Covered period means, with respect to a State, Territory, or Tribal government, the period that: (1) Begins on March 3, 2021; and (2) Ends on the last day of the fiscal year of such State, Territory, or Tribal government in which all funds received by the State, Territory, or Tribal government from a payment made under section 602 or 603 of the Social Security Act have been expended or returned to, or recovered by, the Secretary. COVID–19 means the Coronavirus Disease 2019. COVID–19 public health emergency means the period beginning on January 27, 2020 and until the termination of the national emergency concerning the COVID–19 outbreak declared pursuant to the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.). VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:28 May 14, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\17MYR2.SGM 17MYR2 87 26820 Federal Register /Vol. 86, No. 93/Monday, May 17, 2021/Rules and Regulations Deposit means an extraordinary payment of an accrued, unfunded liability. The term deposit does not refer to routine contributions made by an employer to pension funds as part of the employer’s obligations related to payroll, such as either a pension contribution consisting of a normal cost component related to current employees or a component addressing the amortization of unfunded liabilities calculated by reference to the employer’s payroll costs. Eligible employer means an employer of an eligible worker who performs essential work. Eligible workers means workers needed to maintain continuity of operations of essential critical infrastructure sectors, including health care; emergency response; sanitation, disinfection, and cleaning work; maintenance work; grocery stores, restaurants, food production, and food delivery; pharmacy; biomedical research; behavioral health work; medical testing and diagnostics; home- and community-based health care or assistance with activities of daily living; family or child care; social services work; public health work; vital services to Tribes; any work performed by an employee of a State, local, or Tribal government; educational work, school nutrition work, and other work required to operate a school facility; laundry work; elections work; solid waste or hazardous materials management, response, and cleanup work; work requiring physical interaction with patients; dental care work; transportation and warehousing; work at hotel and commercial lodging facilities that are used for COVID–19 mitigation and containment; work in a mortuary; work in critical clinical research, development, and testing necessary for COVID–19 response. (1) With respect to a recipient that is a metropolitan city, nonentitlement unit of local government, or county, workers in any additional sectors as each chief executive officer of such recipient may designate as critical to protect the health and well-being of the residents of their metropolitan city, nonentitlement unit of local government, or county; or (2) With respect to a State, Territory, or Tribal government, workers in any additional sectors as each Governor of a State or Territory, or each Tribal government, may designate as critical to protect the health and well-being of the residents of their State, Territory, or Tribal government. Essential work means work that: (1) Is not performed while teleworking from a residence; and (2) Involves: (i) Regular in-person interactions with patients, the public, or coworkers of the individual that is performing the work; or (ii) Regular physical handling of items that were handled by, or are to be handled by patients, the public, or coworkers of the individual that is performing the work. Funds means, with respect to a recipient, amounts provided to the recipient pursuant to a payment made under section 602(b) or 603(b) of the Social Security Act or transferred to the recipient pursuant to section 603(c)(4) of the Social Security Act. General revenue means money that is received from tax revenue, current charges, and miscellaneous general revenue, excluding refunds and other correcting transactions, proceeds from issuance of debt or the sale of investments, agency or private trust transactions, and intergovernmental transfers from the Federal Government, including transfers made pursuant to section 9901 of the American Rescue Plan Act. General revenue does not include revenues from utilities. Revenue from Tribal business enterprises must be included in general revenue. Intergovernmental transfers means money received from other governments, including grants and shared taxes. Metropolitan city has the meaning given that term in section 102(a)(4) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5302(a)(4)) and includes cities that relinquish or defer their status as a metropolitan city for purposes of receiving allocations under section 106 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 5306) for fiscal year 2021. Net reduction in total spending is measured as the State or Territory’s total spending for a given reporting year excluding its spending of funds, subtracted from its total spending for its fiscal year ending in 2019, adjusted for inflation using the Bureau of Economic Analysis’s Implicit Price Deflator for the gross domestic product of the United States. Nonentitlement unit of local government means a ‘‘city,’’ as that term is defined in section 102(a)(5) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5302(a)(5)), that is not a metropolitan city. Nonprofit means a nonprofit organization that is exempt from Federal income taxation and that is described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Obligation means an order placed for property and services and entering into contracts, subawards, and similar transactions that require payment. Pension fund means a defined benefit plan and does not include a defined contribution plan. Premium pay means an amount of up to $13 per hour that is paid to an eligible worker, in addition to wages or remuneration the eligible worker otherwise receives, for all work performed by the eligible worker during the COVID–19 public health emergency. Such amount may not exceed $25,000 with respect to any single eligible worker. Premium pay will be considered to be in addition to wages or remuneration the eligible worker otherwise receives if, as measured on an hourly rate, the premium pay is: (1) With regard to work that the eligible worker previously performed, pay and remuneration equal to the sum of all wages and remuneration previously received plus up to $13 per hour with no reduction, substitution, offset, or other diminishment of the eligible worker’s previous, current, or prospective wages or remuneration; or (2) With regard to work that the eligible worker continues to perform, pay of up to $13 that is in addition to the eligible worker’s regular rate of wages or remuneration, with no reduction, substitution, offset, or other diminishment of the workers’ current and prospective wages or remuneration. Qualified census tract has the same meaning given in 26 U.S.C. 42(d)(5)(B)(ii)(I). Recipient means a State, Territory, Tribal government, metropolitan city, nonentitlement unit of local government, county, or unit of general local government that receives a payment made under section 602(b) or 603(b) of the Social Security Act or transfer pursuant to section 603(c)(4) of the Social Security Act. Reporting year means a single year or partial year within the covered period, aligned to the current fiscal year of the State or Territory during the covered period. Secretary means the Secretary of the Treasury. State means each of the 50 States and the District of Columbia. Small business means a business concern or other organization that: (1) Has no more than 500 employees, or if applicable, the size standard in number of employees established by the Administrator of the Small Business Administration for the industry in which the business concern or organization operates; and (2) Is a small business concern as defined in section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632). VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:28 May 14, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\17MYR2.SGM 17MYR2 88 26821 Federal Register /Vol. 86, No. 93/Monday, May 17, 2021/Rules and Regulations Tax revenue means revenue received from a compulsory contribution that is exacted by a government for public purposes excluding refunds and corrections and, for purposes of §35.8, intergovernmental transfers. Tax revenue does not include payments for a special privilege granted or service rendered, employee or employer assessments and contributions to finance retirement and social insurance trust systems, or special assessments to pay for capital improvements. Territory means the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, or American Samoa. Tribal enterprise means a business concern: (1) That is wholly owned by one or more Tribal governments, or by a corporation that is wholly owned by one or more Tribal governments; or (2) That is owned in part by one or more Tribal governments, or by a corporation that is wholly owned by one or more Tribal governments, if all other owners are either United States citizens or small business concerns, as these terms are used and consistent with the definitions in 15 U.S.C. 657a(b)(2)(D). Tribal government means the recognized governing body of any Indian or Alaska Native tribe, band, nation, pueblo, village, community, component band, or component reservation, individually identified (including parenthetically) in the list published by the Bureau of Indian Affairs on January 29, 2021, pursuant to section 104 of the Federally Recognized Indian Tribe List Act of 1994 (25 U.S.C. 5131). Unemployment rate means the U–3 unemployment rate provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics as part of the Local Area Unemployment Statistics program, measured as total unemployment as a percentage of the civilian labor force. Unemployment trust fund means an unemployment trust fund established under section 904 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1104). Unit of general local government has the meaning given to that term in section 102(a)(1) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5302(a)(1)). Unserved and underserved households or businesses means one or more households or businesses that are not currently served by a wireline connection that reliably delivers at least 25 Mbps download speed and 3 Mbps of upload speed. §35.4 Reservation of authority, reporting. (a) Reservation of authority. Nothing in this subpart shall limit the authority of the Secretary to take action to enforce conditions or violations of law, including actions necessary to prevent evasions of this subpart. (b) Extensions or accelerations of timing. The Secretary may extend or accelerate any deadline or compliance date of this subpart, including reporting requirements that implement this subpart, if the Secretary determines that such extension or acceleration is appropriate. In determining whether an extension or acceleration is appropriate, the Secretary will consider the period of time that would be extended or accelerated and how the modified timeline would facilitate compliance with this subpart. (c) Reporting and requests for other information. During the covered period, recipients shall provide to the Secretary periodic reports providing detailed accounting of the uses of funds, all modifications to a State or Territory’s tax revenue sources, and such other information as the Secretary may require for the administration of this section. In addition to regular reporting requirements, the Secretary may request other additional information as may be necessary or appropriate, including as may be necessary to prevent evasions of the requirements of this subpart. False statements or claims made to the Secretary may result in criminal, civil, or administrative sanctions, including fines, imprisonment, civil damages and penalties, debarment from participating in Federal awards or contracts, and/or any other remedy available by law. §35.5 Use of funds. (a) In general. A recipient may only use funds to cover costs incurred during the period beginning March 3, 2021, and ending December 31, 2024, for one or more of the purposes enumerated in sections 602(c)(1) and 603(c)(1) of the Social Security Act, as applicable, including those enumerated in section §35.6, subject to the restrictions set forth in sections 602(c)(2) and 603(c)(2) of the Social Security Act, as applicable. (b) Costs incurred. A cost shall be considered to have been incurred for purposes of paragraph (a) of this section if the recipient has incurred an obligation with respect to such cost by December 31, 2024. (c) Return of funds. A recipient must return any funds not obligated by December 31, 2024, and any funds not expended to cover such obligations by December 31, 2026. §35.6 Eligible uses. (a) In general. Subject to §§35.7 and 35.8, a recipient may use funds for one or more of the purposes described in paragraphs (b) through (e) of this section (b) Responding to the public health emergency or its negative economic impacts. A recipient may use funds to respond to the public health emergency or its negative economic impacts, including for one or more of the following purposes: (1) COVID–19 response and prevention. Expenditures for the mitigation and prevention of COVID–19, including: (i) Expenses related to COVID–19 vaccination programs and sites, including staffing, acquisition of equipment or supplies, facilities costs, and information technology or other administrative expenses; (ii) COVID–19-related expenses of public hospitals, clinics, and similar facilities; (iii) COVID–19 related expenses in congregate living facilities, including skilled nursing facilities, long-term care facilities, incarceration settings, homeless shelters, residential foster care facilities, residential behavioral health treatment, and other group living facilities; (iv) Expenses of establishing temporary public medical facilities and other measures to increase COVID–19 treatment capacity, including related construction costs and other capital investments in public facilities to meet COVID–19-related operational needs; (v) Expenses of establishing temporary public medical facilities and other measures to increase COVID–19 treatment capacity, including related construction costs and other capital investments in public facilities to meet COVID–19-related operational needs; (vi) Costs of providing COVID–19 testing and monitoring, contact tracing, and monitoring of case trends and genomic sequencing for variants; (vii) Emergency medical response expenses, including emergency medical transportation, related to COVID–19; (viii) Expenses for establishing and operating public telemedicine capabilities for COVID–19-related treatment; (ix) Expenses for communication related to COVID–19 vaccination programs and communication or enforcement by recipients of public health orders related to COVID–19; (x) Expenses for acquisition and distribution of medical and protective supplies, including sanitizing products and personal protective equipment; (xi) Expenses for disinfection of public areas and other facilities in VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:28 May 14, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\17MYR2.SGM 17MYR2 89 26822 Federal Register /Vol. 86, No. 93/Monday, May 17, 2021/Rules and Regulations response to the COVID–19 public health emergency; (xii) Expenses for technical assistance to local authorities or other entities on mitigation of COVID–19-related threats to public health and safety; (xiii) Expenses for quarantining or isolation of individuals; (xiv) Expenses of providing paid sick and paid family and medical leave to public employees to enable compliance with COVID–19 public health precautions; (xv) Expenses for treatment of the long-term symptoms or effects of COVID–19, including post-intensive care syndrome; (xvi) Expenses for the improvement of ventilation systems in congregate settings, public health facilities, or other public facilities; (xvii) Expenses related to establishing or enhancing public health data systems; and (xviii) Mental health treatment, substance misuse treatment, and other behavioral health services. (2) Public health and safety staff. Payroll and covered benefit expenses for public safety, public health, health care, human services, and similar employees to the extent that the employee’s time is spent mitigating or responding to the COVID–19 public health emergency. (3) Hiring State and local government staff. Payroll, covered benefit, and other costs associated with the recipient increasing the number of its employees up to the number of employees that it employed on January 27, 2020. (4) Assistance to unemployed workers. Assistance, including job training, for individuals who want and are available for work, including those who have looked for work sometime in the past 12 months or who are employed part time but who want and are available for full-time work. (5) Contributions to State unemployment insurance trust funds. Contributions to an unemployment trust fund up to the level required to restore the unemployment trust fund to its balance on January 27, 2020 or to pay back advances received under Title XII of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1321) for the payment of benefits between January 27, 2020 and May 17, 2021. (6) Small businesses. Assistance to small businesses, including loans, grants, in-kind assistance, technical assistance or other services, that responds to the negative economic impacts of the COVID–19 public health emergency. (7) Nonprofits. Assistance to nonprofit organizations, including loans, grants, in-kind assistance, technical assistance or other services, that responds to the negative economic impacts of the COVID–19 public health emergency. (8) Assistance to households. Assistance programs, including cash assistance programs, that respond to the COVID–19 public health emergency. (9) Aid to impacted industries. Aid to tourism, travel, hospitality, and other impacted industries that responds to the negative economic impacts of the COVID–19 public health emergency. (10) Expenses to improve efficacy of public health or economic relief programs. Administrative costs associated with the recipient’s COVID– 19 public health emergency assistance programs, including services responding to the COVID–19 public health emergency or its negative economic impacts, that are not federally funded. (11) Survivor’s benefits. Benefits for the surviving family members of individuals who have died from COVID–19, including cash assistance to widows, widowers, or dependents of individuals who died of COVID–19. (12) Disproportionately impacted populations and communities. A program, service, or other assistance that is provided in a qualified census tract, that is provided to households and populations living in a qualified census tract, that is provided by a Tribal government, or that is provided to other households, businesses, or populations disproportionately impacted by the COVID–19 public health emergency, such as: (i) Programs or services that facilitate access to health and social services, including: (A) Assistance accessing or applying for public benefits or services; (B) Remediation of lead paint or other lead hazards; and (C) Community violence intervention programs; (ii) Programs or services that address housing insecurity, lack of affordable housing, or homelessness, including: (A) Supportive housing or other programs or services to improve access to stable, affordable housing among individuals who are homeless; (B) Development of affordable housing to increase supply of affordable and high-quality living units; and (C) Housing vouchers and assistance relocating to neighborhoods with higher levels of economic opportunity and to reduce concentrated areas of low economic opportunity; (iii) Programs or services that address or mitigate the impacts of the COVID– 19 public health emergency on education, including: (A) New or expanded early learning services; (B) Assistance to high-poverty school districts to advance equitable funding across districts and geographies; and (C) Educational and evidence-based services to address the academic, social, emotional, and mental health needs of students; and (iv) Programs or services that address or mitigate the impacts of the COVID– 19 public health emergency on childhood health or welfare, including: (A) New or expanded childcare; (B) Programs to provide home visits by health professionals, parent educators, and social service professionals to individuals with young children to provide education and assistance for economic support, health needs, or child development; and (C) Services for child welfare- involved families and foster youth to provide support and education on child development, positive parenting, coping skills, or recovery for mental health and substance use. (c) Providing premium pay to eligible workers. A recipient may use funds to provide premium pay to eligible workers of the recipient who perform essential work or to provide grants to eligible employers, provided that any premium pay or grants provided under this paragraph (c) must respond to eligible workers performing essential work during the COVID–19 public health emergency. A recipient uses premium pay or grants provided under this paragraph (c) to respond to eligible workers performing essential work during the COVID–19 public health emergency if it prioritizes low- and moderate-income persons. The recipient must provide, whether for themselves or on behalf of a grantee, a written justification to the Secretary of how the premium pay or grant provided under this paragraph (c) responds to eligible workers performing essential work if the premium pay or grant would increase an eligible worker’s total wages and remuneration above 150 percent of such eligible worker’s residing State’s average annual wage for all occupations or their residing county’s average annual wage, whichever is higher. (d) Providing government services. For the provision of government services to the extent of a reduction in the recipient’s general revenue, calculated according to paragraphs (d)(1) and (2) of this section. (1) Frequency. A recipient must calculate the reduction in its general revenue using information as-of December 31, 2020, December 31, 2021, December 31, 2022, and December 31, 2023 (each, a calculation date) and following each calculation date. VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:28 May 14, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\17MYR2.SGM 17MYR2 90 26823 Federal Register /Vol. 86, No. 93/Monday, May 17, 2021/Rules and Regulations (2) Calculation. A reduction in a recipient’s general revenue equals: Where: Base Year Revenue is the recipient’s general revenue for the most recent full fiscal year prior to the COVD–19 public health emergency; Growth Adjustment is equal to the greater of 4.1 percent (or 0.041) and the recipient’s average annual revenue growth over the three full fiscal years prior to the COVID–19 public health emergency. n equals the number of months elapsed from the end of the base year to the calculation date. Actual General Revenue is a recipient’s actual general revenue collected during 12-month period ending on each calculation date; Subscript t denotes the specific calculation date. (e) To make necessary investments in infrastructure. A recipient may use funds to make investments in: (1) Clean Water State Revolving Fund and Drinking Water State Revolving Fund investments. Projects or activities of the type that would be eligible under section 603(c) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1383(c)) or section 1452 of the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300j–12); or, (2) Broadband. Broadband infrastructure that is designed to provide service to unserved or underserved households and businesses and that is designed to, upon completion: (i) Reliably meet or exceed symmetrical 100 Mbps download speed and upload speeds; or (ii) In cases where it is not practicable, because of the excessive cost of the project or geography or topography of the area to be served by the project, to provide service meeting the standards set forth in paragraph (e)(2)(i) of this section: (A) Reliably meet or exceed 100 Mbps download speed and between at least 20 Mbps and 100 Mbps upload speed; and (B) Be scalable to a minimum of 100 Mbps download speed and 100 Mbps upload speed. §35.7 Pensions. A recipient may not use funds for deposit into any pension fund. §35.8 Tax. (a) Restriction. A State or Territory shall not use funds to either directly or indirectly offset a reduction in the net tax revenue of the State or Territory resulting from a covered change during the covered period. (b) Violation. Treasury will consider a State or Territory to have used funds to offset a reduction in net tax revenue if, during a reporting year: (1) Covered change. The State or Territory has made a covered change that, either based on a reasonable statistical methodology to isolate the impact of the covered change in actual revenue or based on projections that use reasonable assumptions and do not incorporate the effects of macroeconomic growth to reduce or increase the projected impact of the covered change, the State or Territory assesses has had or predicts to have the effect of reducing tax revenue relative to current law; (2) Exceeds the de minimis threshold. The aggregate amount of the measured or predicted reductions in tax revenue caused by covered changes identified under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, in the aggregate, exceeds 1 percent of the State’s or Territory’s baseline; (3) Reduction in net tax revenue. The State or Territory reports a reduction in net tax revenue, measured as the difference between actual tax revenue and the State’s or Territory’s baseline, each measured as of the end of the reporting year; and (4) Consideration of other changes. The aggregate amount of measured or predicted reductions in tax revenue caused by covered changes is greater than the sum of the following, in each case, as calculated for the reporting year: (i) The aggregate amount of the expected increases in tax revenue caused by one or more covered changes that, either based on a reasonable statistical methodology to isolate the impact of the covered change in actual revenue or based on projections that use reasonable assumptions and do not incorporate the effects of macroeconomic growth to reduce or increase the projected impact of the covered change, the State or Territory assesses has had or predicts to have the effect of increasing tax revenue; and (ii) Reductions in spending, up to the amount of the State’s or Territory’s net reduction in total spending, that are in: (A) Departments, agencies, or authorities in which the State or Territory is not using funds; and (B) Departments, agencies, or authorities in which the State or Territory is using funds, in an amount equal to the value of the spending cuts in those departments, agencies, or authorities, minus funds used. (c) Amount and revenue reduction cap. If a State or Territory is considered to be in violation pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section, the amount used in violation of paragraph (a) of this section is equal to the lesser of: (1) The reduction in net tax revenue of the State or Territory for the reporting year, measured as the difference between the State’s or Territory’s baseline and its actual tax revenue, each measured as of the end of the reporting year; and, (2) The aggregate amount of the reductions in tax revenues caused by covered changes identified in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, minus the sum of the amounts in identified in paragraphs (b)(4)(i) and (ii). §35.9 Compliance with applicable laws. A recipient must comply with all other applicable Federal statutes, regulations, and Executive orders, and a recipient shall provide for compliance with the American Rescue Plan Act, this subpart, and any interpretive guidance by other parties in any agreements it enters into with other parties relating to these funds. §35.10 Recoupment. (a) Identification of violations—(1) In general. Any amount used in violation of §35.5, §35.6, or §35.7 may be identified at any time prior to December 31, 2026. (2) Annual reporting of amounts of violations. On an annual basis, a recipient that is a State or Territory must calculate and report any amounts used in violation of §35.8. (b) Calculation of amounts subject to recoupment—(1) In general. Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, Treasury will calculate any amounts subject to recoupment resulting from a violation of §35.5, §35.6, or §35.7 as the amounts used in violation of such restrictions. (2) Violations of §35.8. Treasury will calculate any amounts subject to recoupment resulting from a violation of §35.8, equal to the lesser of: (i) The amount set forth in §35.8(c); and, VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:07 May 14, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\17MYR2.SGM 17MYR2 ER17MY21.003</GPH>Max {[Base Year Revenue* (1 + Growth Adjustment)(~~)] -Actual General Revenue6 O} 91 26824 Federal Register /Vol. 86, No. 93/Monday, May 17, 2021/Rules and Regulations (ii) The amount of funds received by such recipient. (c) Notice. If Treasury calculates an amount subject to recoupment under paragraph (b) of this section, Treasury will provide the recipient a written notice of the amount subject to recoupment along with an explanation of such amounts. (d) Request for reconsideration. Unless Treasury extends the time period, within 60 calendar days of receipt of a notice of recoupment provided under paragraph (c) of this section, a recipient may submit a written request to Treasury requesting reconsideration of any amounts subject to recoupment under paragraph (b) of this section. To request reconsideration of any amounts subject to recoupment, a recipient must submit to Treasury a written request that includes: (1) An explanation of why the recipient believes all or some of the amount should not be subject to recoupment; and (2) A discussion of supporting reasons, along with any additional information. (e) Final amount subject to recoupment. Unless Treasury extends the time period, within 60 calendar days of receipt of the recipient’s request for reconsideration provided pursuant to paragraph (d) of this section, the recipient will be notified of the Secretary’s decision to affirm, withdraw, or modify the notice of recoupment. Such notification will include an explanation of the decision, including responses to the recipient’s supporting reasons and consideration of additional information provided. (f) Repayment of funds. Unless Treasury extends the time period, a recipient shall repay to the Secretary any amounts subject to recoupment in accordance with instructions provided by Treasury: (1) Within 120 calendar days of receipt of the notice of recoupment provided under paragraph (c) of this section, in the case of a recipient that does not submit a request for reconsideration in accordance with the requirements of paragraph (d) of this section; or (2) Within 120 calendar days of receipt of the Secretary’s decision under paragraph (e) of this section, in the case of a recipient that submits a request for reconsideration in accordance with the requirements of paragraph (d) of this section. §35.11 Payments to States. (a) In general. With respect to any State or Territory that has an unemployment rate as of the date that it submits an initial certification for payment of funds pursuant to section 602(d)(1) of the Social Security Act that is less than two percentage points above its unemployment rate in February 2020, the Secretary will withhold 50 percent of the amount of funds allocated under section 602(b) of the Social Security Act to such State or territory until the date that is twelve months from the date such initial certification is provided to the Secretary. (b) Payment of withheld amount. In order to receive the amount withheld under paragraph (a) of this section, the State or Territory must submit to the Secretary at least 30 days prior to the date referenced in paragraph (a) the following information: (1) A certification, in the form provided by the Secretary, that such State or Territory requires the payment to carry out the activities specified in section 602(c) of the Social Security Act and will use the payment in compliance with section 602(c) of the Social Security Act; and, (2) Any reports required to be filed by that date pursuant to this subpart that have not yet been filed. §35.12 Distributions to nonentitlement units of local government and units of general local government. (a) Nonentitlement units of local government. Each State or Territory that receives a payment from Treasury pursuant to section 603(b)(2)(B) of the Social Security Act shall distribute the amount of the payment to nonentitlement units of government in such State or Territory in accordance with the requirements set forth in section 603(b)(2)(C) of the Social Security Act and without offsetting any debt owed by such nonentitlement units of local governments against such payments. (b) Budget cap. A State or Territory may not make a payment to a nonentitlement unit of local government pursuant to section 603(b)(2)(C) of the Social Security Act and paragraph (a) of this section in excess of the amount equal to 75 percent of the most recent budget for the nonentitlement unit of local government as of January 27, 2020. A State or Territory shall permit a nonentitlement unit of local government without a formal budget as of January 27, 2020, to provide a certification from an authorized officer of the nonentitlement unit of local government of its most recent annual expenditures as of January 27, 2020, and a State or Territory may rely on such certification for purposes of complying with this paragraph (b). (c) Units of general local government. Each State or Territory that receives a payment from Treasury pursuant to section 603(b)(3)(B)(ii) of the Social Security Act, in the case of an amount to be paid to a county that is not a unit of general local government, shall distribute the amount of the payment to units of general local government within such county in accordance with the requirements set forth in section 603(b)(3)(B)(ii) of the Social Security Act and without offsetting any debt owed by such units of general local government against such payments. (d) Additional conditions. A State or Territory may not place additional conditions or requirements on distributions to nonentitlement units of local government or units of general local government beyond those required by section 603 of the Social Security Act or this subpart. Laurie Schaffer, Acting General Counsel. [FR Doc. 2021–10283 Filed 5–13–21; 11:15 am] BILLING CODE 4810–AK–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:28 May 14, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\17MYR2.SGM 17MYR2 92 CONSENT AGENDA ITEM 304 CITY COMMISSION AGENDA | SEPTEMBER 13, 2021 REGULAR MEETING TITLE Torcaso Restrooms South Side SUMMARY Recently the home at 120 Flamingo was purchased by the City. The home and land is located between city property which connects to Torcaso Park. The South side of the park already has refurbished basketball courts. The plan is to build a second Pavilion on the south side of the pond connecting it to the Pavilion on the North side by a boardwalk across the pond. Also, we plan for a dog park on the property on the corner of Flamingo and N. First Street. The North side of the park has Restrooms near the playground and the location of the new Pavilion. With all these activities on the south side of the park the acquisition of the small home is opportunistic to renovate it into restrooms and a storage room for the park. The renovation would be much more economical than building a structure from scratch. The last two restroom structures cost the city between $200,000 and $300,000. The renovation of this facility would be around $100,000. RECOMMENDATION In Summary, It is staff's recommendation to renovate the home into two restrooms and a storage facility. A majority of the work involved will be accomplished by City Staff. It is estimated that the renovation to cost $100,000. A 10% contingency is being requested for any unknown scope increases with renovations. The Total project cost, not to exceed and including the contingency is $110,000. Additionally, authorization for the City Manager and City Attorney is requested to prepare and execute any and all applicable contract documents consistent with this Agenda item. 93 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS FLAMINGO COST ESTIMATE ITEM ESTIMATED COST Architect 8,500 Electrical Engineer 2,000 Mechanical Engineer 2,000 Permit 1,000 Dumpster for removal of debris 3,000 New Roof (Metal - Blue to match Pavilion)8,500 Landscaping / SOD 5,000 Block Mason to close in sliding glass door / Windows 5,000 Cinder Block & Morter 1,500 Doors and Windows 5,000 Partitions for both bathrooms 3,500 Wood for Framing Walls 2,500 Sheetrock 5,000 Tile/Thinset for Walls 48" high 15,000 Toilet's (5)2,500 Sinks (4)1,000 Urinals (2)1,000 Paint for walls 1,000 Paint for Floors 1,500 Paint for Outside of Restrooms 1,500 Light Fixtures (Inside and Out)1,000 Plumbing Materials 2,000 Remove Garage (roof Rotted)4,000 Concrete 5,000 Plywood for boarding up windows inside 500 Temp Labor 2,000 Home Depot Blanket (for misc items, Nails, Screws)1,000 Lowes Blanket ( for misc items, Nails, Screws)1,000 Fergusson Blanket (Misc Plumbing items)1,000 Misc 6,500 TOTAL 100,000 94 A green project repurposing an existing residential home to become a beautiful addition to Torcaso Park. Torcaso Restroom and Utility Pavilion 95 This project is located on the south side of Torcaso Park. Currently, an old residential home is located there. This project proposes this existing building be re- purposed to serve as public restrooms and as park storage. This is part of a larger vision to strengthen the connection to the southern part of Torcaso Park. 96 97 Exterior features an area for resting and hydration.98 Restroom Interior 99 Floor Plan 100 Thank You A green project repurposing an existing residential home to become a beautiful addition to Torcaso Park.101 CONSENT AGENDA ITEM 305 CITY COMMISSION AGENDA | SEPTEMBER 13, 2021 REGULAR MEETING TITLE Purchase of new security camera system SUMMARY The Cities current camera system is past warranty, in disrepair, utilizes hardware that is now on the US Federal contract blacklist and in need of replacement. For these reasons, we have evaluated options for a new system and settled on Meraki’s camera solutions. Meraki (owned by Cisco Systems) has become an industry leader in network and camera systems by removing the need for costly on-premise NVR’s and enterprise servers. Their platform offers infinitely scalable growth potential and un-ending license warranties with 24/7 support. The same system is used at the City of Casselberry, City of New Smyrna Beach and the Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority. Cost of replacement to be $128,000 with opportunities to apply for grants for cost assistance. Cost includes 5 years of licensing, maintenance and service as well as additional network equipment needed to sustain connectivity for all devices and time and labor for installation services. Quantity breakdown as follows: City Hall – 11 cameras Police Department – 21 cameras Public Works Compound – 6 cameras Senior Center – 20 cameras RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Commission approve purchase of new security camera system. 102 CONSENT AGENDA ITEM 306 CITY COMMISSION AGENDA | SEPTEMBER 13, 2021 REGULAR MEETING TITLE Purchase of new GPS vehicle fleet management system SUMMARY The City's current vehicle telematics system utilizes 3G cellular connection devices that will soon be reaching end of life and requiring a change out. The current telematics system service term ends on September 30th 2021 and does not allow for vehicle maintenance tracking. We received quotes from several vendors and have determined that Samara is the lowest and most responsive product to our needs. Samsara is one of the leading telematics providers today with focus on customer service and ease-of-use. They come highly recommended by City of Cocoa and Ft. Lauderdale. This will be a 3 year contract. Cost to purchase the replacement system is $35,696.80 for the first year and $35,199.80 per year for the remaining years. This covers City vehicle GPS units and non-vehicle GPS units for City assets. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Commission authorize the City Manager to execute a three year contract with Samsara for the City's vehicle GPS fleet management system not to exceed $36,000 annually. 103 Telematics-GPS Tracking Systems Comparison A Samsara B Verizon Connect C GeoTab with AT&T D GeoTab with T-Mobile ✔Samsara VG34 hardware (GPS device) ✔Verizon Xirgo XT6372 hardware (GPS device) ✔GeoTab GO9+ hardware (GPS device) ✔GeoTab GO9+ hardware (GPS device) ✔ OBD II port or 3 wire adaptor connection ✔OBD II port or 3 wire adaptor connection ✔OBD II port or 3 wire adaptor connection ✔OBD II port or 3 wire adaptor connection✔ Cellular network with satellite backup ✔Verizon cellular network (Public Safety private network) ✔T-Mobile/Sprint cellular ✔T-Mobile/Sprint cellular ✔4G LTE data ✔4G LTE data ✔4G LTE data ✔4G LTE data ✔Samsara Connected Operations Platform ✔Verizon Connect Reveal dashboard ✔T-Mobile MyGeotab dashboard ✔T-Mobile MyGeotab dashboard ✔Mobile app ✔Mobile app ✔Mobile app ✔Mobile app ✔User & vehicle grouping ✔User & vehicle grouping ✔User & vehicle grouping ✔User & vehicle grouping ✔5 sec to 30 sec device ping transmission X 90 sec device ping transmission ✔5 sec to 30 sec device ping transmission ✔5 sec to 30 sec device ping transmission ✔Precise GPS tracking with real-time visibility with GPS fix every 3 seconds X Real-time visibility ✔Geotab Curve Logic collections & store all GPS data ✔Geotab Curve Logic collections & store all GPS data ✔Google Maps API ✔Google Maps API ✔Google Maps API ✔Google Maps API ✔Has geofencing logs & alerts ✔Has geofencing logs & alerts ✔Has geofencing logs & alerts ✔Has geofencing logs & alerts X Geofence suggesting ✔Geofence suggesting X Geofence suggesting X Geofence suggesting ✔Bar code reader X Bar code reader X Bar code reader X Bar code reader ✔Driver check in Keyfob scanner ✔Driver check in Card scanner ✔Driver check in Card scanner ✔Driver check in Card scanner ✔Emergency lights & siren logs & alerts ✔Emergency lights & siren logs & alerts ✔Emergency lights & siren logs & alerts ✔Emergency lights & siren logs & alerts ✔AWS Platform X Verizon Data Center - Miami ✔Google Cloud Platform ✔Google Cloud Platform ✔Data storage time indefinitely ✔Data stored for 12 months ✔Data stored for 12 months ✔Data stored for 12 months ✔Driver scorecards ✔Driver scorecards ✔Driver scorecards ✔Driver scorecards ✔Fuel efficiency & cost analysis ✔Fuel efficiency & cost analysis ✔Fuel efficiency & cost analysis ✔Fuel efficiency & cost analysis ✔ Monitors engine diagnostics ✔Monitors engine diagnostics ✔ Monitors engine diagnostics ✔ Monitors engine diagnostics ✔Event logs & alert (i.e. harsh braking or speeding) ✔Event logs & alert (i.e. harsh braking or speeding) ✔Event logs & alert (i.e. harsh braking or speeding) ✔Event logs & alert (i.e. harsh braking or speeding) ✔Carbon Emission Tracking ✔Carbon Emission Tracking ✔Carbon Emission Tracking ✔Carbon Emission Tracking ✔Electric Vehicle Integration ✔Electric Vehicle Integration ✔Electric Vehicle Integration ✔Electric Vehicle Integration ✔Vehicle diagnostics & engine code logs ✔Vehicle diagnostics & engine code logs ✔Vehicle diagnostics & engine code logs ✔Vehicle diagnostics & engine code logs ✔Integrates with pro-active maintenance and vehicle servicing X Integrates with pro-active maintenance and vehicle servicing X Integrates with pro-active maintenance and vehicle servicing X Integrates with pro-active maintenance and vehicle servicing !36 Month Service Agreement commitment ✔12 Month Service Agreement commitment then month to month !24 Month Service Agreement commitment !24 Month Service Agreement commitment ✔No 3rd-party vendor, deal directly with hardware & software vendor ✔No 3rd-party vendor, deal directly with hardware & software vendor X No 3rd-party vendor, deal directly with hardware & software vendor X No 3rd-party vendor, deal directly with hardware & software vendor 104 samsara.com 1 Samsara Networks Inc 444 De Haro St Suite 101 San Francisco, CA 94107 www.samsara.com Quote Summary Subtotal Hardware and Accessories $0.00 Licenses License Term – 36 Months Shipping and Handling $497.00 Upfront Hardware Sales Tax $0.00 If shipping is "Pending" - Amount is pending due to size of order; Shipping and Handling subject to change.If Sales tax is “Pending” – Final amount will be provided prior to payment*3% fee charged on non-ACH charges (Canada Exempt) *Sales tax subject to change Annual License Sales Tax $0.00 First Year Payment $35,696.80 Payments Beginning Year Two $35,199.80 Prepared For: City of Winter Springs 1126 East State Road, Suite 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 Prepared By: Aldon Ortego aldon.ortego@samsara.com Issued 08-19-2021 Expires 08-31-2021 QUOTE #Q-96187 105 samsara.com 2 Samsara Networks Inc 444 De Haro St Suite 101 San Francisco, CA 94107 www.samsara.com SHIP TO William Hackney 1126 E State Rd 434 Winter Springs, Florida, 32708 United States Hardware and Accessories Quantity Net Unit Price Total Price Driver ID Token ACC-DRIVERID 200 $0.00 $0.00 VG34 OBDII J1962 L-mount cable CBL-VG-BOBDII-Y1 158 $0.00 $0.00 AG46P HW-AG46P 19 $0.00 $0.00 AG Non-Trailer Power Cable Harness CBL-AG-APWR 19 $0.00 $0.00 Universal BJ1939 CBL-VG-BJ1939-Y0 6 $0.00 $0.00 VG34 J1708 Screw-Mount Cable CBL-VG-BJ1708 3 $0.00 $0.00 Hardware Due $0.00 Licenses Quantity Annual Unit Price Total Annual Price License for powered Asset Trackers LIC-AG4P-ENT 19 $144.00 $2,736.00 Annual License Due $2,736.00 Bundles Quantity Annual Unit Price Total Annual Price License for Vehicle Gateways - Public Sector Only, No WiFi, No ELD LIC-VG-PS 164 $197.95 $32,463.80 106 samsara.com 3 Samsara Networks Inc 444 De Haro St Suite 101 San Francisco, CA 94107 www.samsara.com Annual License Due $32,463.80 107 samsara.com 4 Samsara Networks Inc 444 De Haro St Suite 101 San Francisco, CA 94107 www.samsara.com Thank you for considering Samsara for your fleet. Samsara provides real-time visibility, business-relevant tools, and powerful analytics that enable customers to increase the productivity of their fleets and reduce operating costs. A solution for your fleet is proposed below. What is included? Samsara’s fleet tracking solution includes hardware accessories and a per- gateway license. Gateway licenses provide all ongoing elements of the service, including: - Real-time location and vehicle telematics - Dashboard access with unlimited administrator accounts - Driver App for iOS and Android devices with unlimited driver accounts - Over-the-air software feature upgrades - API access as it relates to features for integration with 3rd party systems - Maintenance and phone support Samsara does not include hidden costs in its licenses. If you want access to Samsara’s full set of fleet features--including but not limited to WiFi hotspot and ELD capabilities--you will need to upgrade your license. Samsara reserves the right to audit usage of features unrelated to the solution as well as remove them from the Samsara Dashboard. 108 samsara.com 5 Samsara Networks Inc 444 De Haro St Suite 101 San Francisco, CA 94107 www.samsara.com Payment Terms This order form includes a one-time fee of hardware cost to be paid upfront and a Service License cost to be paid annually. The annual fees are payable by recurring wire transfer. All transfers are subject to a 3% processing fee unless the wire transfer is initiated by Samsara via ACH, in which case the 3% processing fee will be waived. Late payments are subject to a 1.5% per month late fee. If license payments are delinquent by 60 days, Samsara may suspend the Service until late payments are remitted. License Term The license term begins on the day your Samsara hardware ships. If you wish to continue using the service when your license term ends, you may renew your license. Samsara hardware requires a valid license to function. Samsara may ship Hardware under this Order Form subject to a schedule as mutually agreed between the Parties or as determined by Samsara. The Samsara Software license term for each Hardware device will start on the day that device ships regardless of the shipment schedule for the other Hardware devices. If all Hardware is shipped in one shipment, the license term for all Hardware will be the full license term under this Order Form. If Hardware is shipped in multiple shipments, only the license term of Hardware in the initial shipment will be as such a full license term. The license term of the remaining Hardware shipped after the initial shipment will be set to match the then-remaining license term of the initial shipment, so that the license term for all Hardware under this Order Form expires on the same date. The total cost of the licenses for Hardware shipped after the initial shipment will be pro-rated based on their actual license term, rounded up to the nearest month, as compared to the full license term under this Order Form. Certain payment amounts under this Order Form assume that the entire order is fulfilled at the same time, and are subject to potential reduction based on the actual schedule of order fulfillment. Support and Warranty Samsara stands behind its Products. Hardware Products that require a valid license to function come with a warranty that lasts as long as you maintain a valid license for such Hardware. All other Hardware Products, such as accessories, come with a one-year warranty, unless otherwise specified on the relevant Samsara data sheet. During the warranty period, Hardware exhibiting material defects will be replaced. For more information, see our Hardware Warranty & RMA policy at www.samsara.com/support/hardware-warranty. Additional support information can be found at www.samsara.com/support. Terms Unless otherwise set forth herein, your use and access of the Hardware, Products, and Services specified herein are governed by Samsara’s terms of service found at https://www.samsara.com/terms-of-service, unless the Parties have entered into a separate terms of service agreement and/or a separate terms of service agreement is attached to this Order Form, in which case such separate terms of service agreement shall govern (the 'Terms of Service'). You agree to be bound by the Terms of Service, and any capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Terms of Service. You further agree that any other Order Forms you enter into for the purchase of Products shall also be governed by the Terms of Service unless otherwise set forth in the applicable Order Form. For clarity, unless otherwise agreed by the Parties or approved by Samsara, the pricing and payment terms under this Order Form shall not apply to any such other Order Forms. The continuation of this Agreement on an annual basis after the Effective Date is contingent upon 109 samsara.com 6 Samsara Networks Inc 444 De Haro St Suite 101 San Francisco, CA 94107 www.samsara.com the appropriation of sufficient funds. If sufficient funds fail to be appropriated to provide for the continuation of the Agreement, the Agreement shall terminate on the date of the beginning of the subsequent fiscal year for which funds have not been appropriated. Samsara shall be entitled to payment for deliverables in progress; liabilities, fees, or costs caused by such termination including for obligations that extend beyond the date of termination; and reasonable Agreement close-out costs. Notification of Confidentiality You agree that the pricing and payment terms specified in this Order Form shall (i) be held in strict confidence; (ii) not be disclosed to any Samsara competitor or other entity, except as approved in writing by the Samsara; and (iii) not be used except to evaluate the suitability of the Samsara Products for your business. You will immediately notify Samsara in the event of any unauthorized use or disclosure under these terms. Violation of these obligations will cause irreparable harm to Samsara for which Samsara may obtain compensatory and timely injunctive relief from a court, as well as any other remedies that may be available, including recovery of all reasonable attorney’s fees and costs incurred in seeking such remedies. Your obligations specified herein shall last until the pricing and payment terms herein are, through no fault or action by you, public. This Order Form is a legally binding agreement between Customer and Samsara Networks Inc. (“Samsara”). IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Customer has caused this Order Form to be executed by its duly authorized representative. 110 samsara.com 7 Samsara Networks Inc 444 De Haro St Suite 101 San Francisco, CA 94107 www.samsara.com Please confirm acceptance of this Order Form by signing below: Signature \s1\ Print Name:\n1\ Date:\d1\ 111 CITY COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES MONDAY, JULY 7, 2021 AT 6:30 PM CITY HALL - COMMISSION CHAMBERS 1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434, WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 112 CITY COMMISSION MIN UTES | WORKSHOP | WEDNESDAY, JULY 7, 2021 | PAGE 2 OF 4 CALL TO ORDER Mayor Kevin McCann called the City Commission Workshop of Wednesday, July 7, 2021 of the City Commission to order at 6:30 PM in the Commission Chambers of the Municipal Building (City Hall, 1126 East State Road 434, Winter Springs, Florida 32708). Roll Call: Mayor Kevin McCann, present Deputy Mayor Ted Johnson, present Commissioner Matt Benton, present Commissioner Kevin Cannon, present Commissioner TiAnna Hale, present Commissioner Rob Elliott, present City Manager Shawn Boyle, present City Clerk Christian Gowan, present PUBLIC INPUT Mayor McCann opened Public Input No one spoke. Mayor McCann closed Public Input DISCUSSION ITEMS 1) FY 2022 Budget Overview and Discussion Manager Boyle acknowledged the hard work done by staff and provided a high level review of the proposed budget. Discussion followed on reoccurring revenues and expenses, practicing tight fiscal discipline, the goal to maintain 25% fund balance/savings for variability of cash flow in each of the funds, and the various enterprise funds. Manager Boyle noted the proposed budget consisted of $55.4 million in expenditures, up about $3.8 million largely due to an increase in capital expenditures, inflationary pressure on wages, and supplies Manager Boyle noted the current budget being discussed was the proposed budget with the millage proposed to stay at 2.41 mills, higher property valuation estimates meant the proposed millage would bring in a roughly $369,000 increase to the General Fund of which $110,000 was new properties never previously taxed. 113 CITY COMMISSION MIN UTES | WORKSHOP | WEDNESDAY, JULY 7, 2021 | PAGE 3 OF 4 Discussion followed on a proposed 4% raise pool, healthcare costs, employee headcount, capital expenses focused largely on utility upgrades, road resurfacing, a bridge study, and road and bridge conditions. Manager Boyle discussed inflation considerations and contingencies ranging from pushing out discretionary projects to the last resort of asking the Commission for a tax increase. Manager Boyle then discussed federal funds being distributed as a result of the American Rescue Plan Act and the possibility of distributing some of these funds through the County to assist with community needs if the Commission was in favor of the idea. Extreme level of dedication from employees Further discussion followed on a dip in half-cent sales tax revenues, the Lake Jesup Reclaimed Water Augmentation Plant, project and project prioritization. Discussion turned to the pension. Manager Boyle noted a current funding level slightly over 100% with about $75 million in assets and noted this meant the pension was relying on investment returns rather than taxpayers and actions were being taken to de-risk the portfolio. Manager Boyle briefly reviewed capital investment projects focused on the utility and reviewed the planned expenditures including plant replacement and water aesthetics improvements. Brief discussion followed on changes to specific funds and line items in the budget and staff provided rationale. "MOTION TO APPROVE EXTENSION OF MEETING THROUGH SECOND PUBLIC INPUT." MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CANNON. SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER BENTON. DISCUSSION. VOTE: BENTON (AYE); CANNON (AYE); JOHNSON (AYE); HALE (AYE); ELLIOTT (AYE) MOTION CARRIED 5-0. The Commission agreed that they wanted representatives from the UCF Incubator and the Oviedo-Winter Springs Regional Chamber of Commerce to present at a future Commission meeting and the opportunity to ask questions about the use of city funding. Discussion then turned to the Tuscawilla Units 12/12A Service and Improvement Assessment Area (Hawk’s Reserve) with staff noting the current rate needed to be reevaluated, convening residents to discuss options, and the Commission asking 114 CITY COMMISSION MIN UTES | WORKSHOP | WEDNESDAY, JULY 7, 2021 | PAGE 4 OF 4 about the formation of a board similar to those established for other assessment areas. Staff agreed to provide a list of residents within the assessment area for the Commission to review. PUBLIC INPUT Mr. Maurice Kaprow, P.O. Box 195233, Winter Springs commended the Commission on the questions they asked, staff for the answers provided, and said he appreciated everyone’s dedication. ADJOURNMENT Mayor McCann adjourned the meeting at 9:15 PM. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: ____________________________________ CHRISTIAN GOWAN CITY CLERK APPROVED: ____________________________________ MAYOR KEVIN MCCANN NOTE: These Minutes were approved at the _________________, 2021 City Commission Regular Meeting. 115 CITY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES MONDAY, AUGUST 9, 2021 AT 6:30 PM CITY HALL - COMMISSION CHAMBERS 1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434, WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 116 CITY COMMISSION MINUTES | REGULAR MEETING | MONDAY, AUGUST 9, 2021 | PAGE 2 OF 13 CALL TO ORDER Mayor Kevin McCann called the Regular Meeting of Monday, August 9, 2021 of the City Commission to order at 6:30 p.m. in the Commission Chambers of the Municipal Building (City Hall, 1126 East State Road 434, Winter Springs, Florida 32708). Roll Call: Mayor Kevin McCann, present Deputy Mayor Ted Johnson, present Commissioner Matt Benton, present Commissioner Kevin Cannon, present Commissioner TiAnna Hale, present Commissioner Rob Elliott, present City Manager Shawn Boyle, present City Attorney Anthony A. Garganese, present City Clerk Christian Gowan, present The following changes were made to the agenda: Commissioner Cannon asked that Item 302 be pulled from the Consent Agenda for further discussion. Additionally, the Clerk advised an add-on item for appointment opportunities to City Advisory Boards/Committees. AWARDS AND PRESENTATIONS 100) Presentation of Key to the City to Monsignor John Bluett Mayor McCann introduced the item and spoke of Monsignor Bluett's service followed by Commissioner Cannon. Mayor McCann then presented the Key to the City to Monsignor John Bluett. Monsignor Bluett thanked the Commission for this honor, spoke about his love of the community, his work, and the work of all residents that make it all possible. Continuing, Monsignor Bluett shared memories and his appreciation for staff and all in attendance. 101) Presentation of Resolution to Lt. William C. Maxwell Jr. recognizing his retirement from the Police Department. Chief Deisler thanked all in attendance for coming to support and celebrate Lieutenant Maxwell on his years of service and delivered brief remarks. Mayor McCann read Resolution 2021-17 honoring Lieutenant Will Maxwell. 117 CITY COMMISSION MINUTES | REGULAR MEETING | MONDAY, AUGUST 9, 2021 | PAGE 3 OF 13 Lieutenant Maxwell spoke briefly and thanked the Chief, his fellow officers, his family, and the Mayor and Commission. 102) Recognition of A Budget Tree for donation of Mulch to Community Garden Mr. Brian Dunigan, Parks Manager, Parks and Recreation Department spoke briefly and thanked Mr. Dale Meagher of A Budget Tree Service for his donation of mulch to the Winter Springs Community Garden Mr. Dunigan also provided a brief update on the Community Garden. 103) Recognizing the Central Florida Student Athletes of the Year Mr. McCann gave a brief introduction and asked Mr. Scott Gomrad, Athletic Director, Winter Springs High School to introduce the Student Athletes of the Year. Mr. Gomrad spoke about the accomplishments of Marvin Collins and Caroline Wells and the fact that this was the first time ever that Student Athletes of the Year had been named from the same school. ADD-ON) Proclamation for Alan Harris Mayor McCann read and presented a proclamation to Mr. Alan Harris, Chief Administrator, Seminole County Office of Emergency Management for his work throughout the COVID pandemic. Mr. Alan Harris noted his team and thanked them for their assistance. INFORMATIONAL AGENDA 200) Current Development Projects Summary No discussion. 201) Annual Report- Diversity Workshop No discussion. PUBLIC INPUT Mr. Art Gallo, 199 Nandina Terrace, Winter Springs noted he thought this was the best meeting he had ever been to, asked about the Mayor discussion workshop, and spoke about water suggestions for inclusion in a bill. 118 CITY COMMISSION MINUTES | REGULAR MEETING | MONDAY, AUGUST 9, 2021 | PAGE 4 OF 13 Commissioner Cannon noted an upcoming town hall meeting on water and asked for Mr. Gallo to participate. Mr. Paul Partyka, 404 Park Lake Drive, Winter Springs spoke about the two individuals honored at the meeting, announced the Rotary golf tournament coming up, and spoke about support of the UCF Incubator program, Chamber of Commerce, and Waste Pro. Mr. Ron Ligthart, 1036 Winding Water Circle, Winter Springs provided an update on his previous water meter issue, complimented staff for their quick response. Continuing, he suggested moving public input up when meetings go very long and spoke about the millage rate. CONSENT AGENDA 300) Surplus Assets No discussion. 301) Non-Ad Valorem Assessment Roll, Assessment Summary and FY 2021-2022 Annual Assessment Roll for Tax Year 2021 relating to the the Oak Forest Wall and Beautification District, Tuscawilla Lighting and Beautification Assessment Area, and Tuscawilla Phase III Assessment Areas. No discussion. 302) Contract with the Seminole County Sheriff’s Office for Dispatch Service Consolidation This item was pulled from the Consent Agenda and discussed under the Regular Agenda. 303) Police Portable Radio Purchase No discussion. 304) Shooting Range for Police Department No discussion. 305) Resolution 2021-20 Recognizing Outstanding Community Service of Winter Springs VFW Post 5405 and authorize the City Clerk to send a copy of the resolution to VFW Post 5405. No discussion. 119 CITY COMMISSION MINUTES | REGULAR MEETING | MONDAY, AUGUST 9, 2021 | PAGE 5 OF 13 306) Resolution 2021-22 Adoption of Seminole County Floodplain Management Plan No discussion. 307) Update the City’s Investment Policy Statement for the City’s Operating Cash (excludes the pension assets). No discussion. 308) Minutes from the Monday, July 12, 2021 City Commission Regular Meeting No discussion. "MOTION TO APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA MINUS ITEM 302." MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HALE. SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER CANNON. DISCUSSION. VOTE: BENTON (AYE); CANNON (AYE); JOHNSON (AYE); HALE (AYE); ELLIOTT (AYE) MOTION CARRIED 5-0. PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA 400) Winter Springs Marketplace - Aesthetic Plan Approval. Mr. Schmidt introduced the item, reviewed previous projects associated with the Winter Springs Marketplace, and noted staff’s recommendation of approval. Brief discussion followed noting appreciation to the developer for working with staff and residents and some traffic flow concerns from neighboring properties. Mayor McCann opened the Public Hearing for Item 400. Nobody spoke. Mayor McCann closed the Public Hearing for Item 400. "MOTION TO APPROVE THE AESTHETIC REVIEW FOR CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL." MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HALE. SECONDED BY DEPUTY MAYOR JOHNSON. DISCUSSION. VOTE: CANNON (AYE); JOHNSON (AYE); HALE (AYE); ELLIOTT (AYE); BENTON (AYE) MOTION CARRIED 5-0. 401) Second Reading of Ordinance 2021-05 120 CITY COMMISSION MINUTES | REGULAR MEETING | MONDAY, AUGUST 9, 2021 | PAGE 6 OF 13 Attorney Garganese read Ordinance 2021-05 by title only. Mayor McCann opened the Public Hearing for Item 401. Nobody spoke. Mayor McCann closed the Public Hearing for Item 401. "MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 2021-05." MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CANNON. SECONDED BY DEPUTY MAYOR JOHNSON. DISCUSSION. VOTE: JOHNSON (AYE); CANNON (AYE); ELLIOTT (AYE); BENTON (AYE); HALE (AYE) MOTION CARRIED 5-0. REGULAR AGENDA 500) UCF Incubator Annual Update Mr. Schmidt introduced Mr. Rob Panepinto, Director, Innovation Districts Strategy and Partnerships and Senior Strategic Advisor and Mr. Rafael Caamano, Site Manager, UCF Winter Springs Incubator, 1511 East State Road 434, Suite 2001, Winter Springs. Mr. Panepinto thanked the Commission for their previous support, discussed funding sources, and participants in the Winter Springs Incubator. Mr. Caamano presented the mission, capacity, noted the current incubation of sixteen (16) companies, described programs &and services offered, and introduced recent graduate Michael Connell who briefly spoke about his experience with the Winter Springs Incubator. Mr. Caamano further broke down what the funding for Winter Springs was used for and encouraged Commissioners to visit and see what they do firsthand. Discussion followed on office space availability in Winter Springs, various statistics, and retaining businesses within Winter Springs. Commissioner Elliott asked several questions and provided a list of these questions for the record. Further discussion followed on the need for more information, contributions to date, the possibility for more community involvement, the need to assist existing businesses, and potential revised tracking criteria if funding were to be provided. Several Commissioners noted they did not feel they had adequate data to make an 121 CITY COMMISSION MINUTES | REGULAR MEETING | MONDAY, AUGUST 9, 2021 | PAGE 7 OF 13 informed decision and asked about the possibility of the Incubator coming back with more information. Mr. Panepinto noted time constraints and the Commission agreed to place this discussion on the Special Meeting Agenda for Monday, August 30, 2021. "MOTION TO APPROVE EXTENDING THE MEETING THROUGH SECOND PUBLIC INPUT." MOTION BY DEPUTY MAYOR JOHNSON. SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER CANNON. DISCUSSION. MOTION PASSED WITH UNANIMOUS CONSENT. 501) Winter Springs - Oviedo Chamber of Commerce Update Mr. Christopher Schmidt, Director, Community Development Department introduced Mr. Randy Perry, Chairman, Oviedo-Winter Springs Regional Chamber of Commerce. Mr. Perry reviewed the mission, vision, values, accomplishments, continuing initiatives, reviewed how City dollars were used, and reviewed trustee benefits. Discussion followed with Commissioners expressing appreciation for the information brought forward and for the work of the Chamber. Commissioners did note concerns about politics and the need for the Chamber to stay neutral. "MOTION TO APPROVE CONTINUING THE TRUSTEE MEMBERSHIP ANNUAL $5,000 CONTRIBUTION." MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HALE. SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER ELLIOTT. DISCUSSION. VOTE: ELLIOTT (AYE); BENTON (NAY); HALE (AYE); JOHNSON (AYE); CANNON (NAY) MOTION CARRIED 3-2. Brief discussion followed on the possibility of the Chamber coming back to discuss recruiting businesses to Winter Springs, better reaching out to home-based businesses, and promoting what the Chamber does for the community. 502) Waste Pro Annual Performance Review Ms. Maria Sonksen, Director, Finance Department reviewed the performance review and noted Waste Pro had achieved at least a 90% rate since 2007. Mr. Eric Saxton, Division Manager, Waste Pro USA, 3705 St Johns Parkway, Sanford, Florida introduced himself and noted that he was available for questions. 122 CITY COMMISSION MINUTES | REGULAR MEETING | MONDAY, AUGUST 9, 2021 | PAGE 8 OF 13 Discussion followed with Commissioners noting concerns about declining performance review evaluations, impacts of COVID on personnel, questions about recycling, factors outside of Waste Pro’s control that may impact scores, and gratitude for Waste Pro’s support of community events. "MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 502." MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CANNON. SECONDED BY DEPUTY MAYOR JOHNSON. DISCUSSION. VOTE: BENTON (AYE); HALE (AYE); CANNON (AYE); ELLIOTT (AYE); JOHNSON (AYE) MOTION CARRIED 5-0. 503) Appeal of a Lien Reduction 629 Alton Road Manager Boyle first reviewed the City Code and the defined appeal process. Deputy Chief Matt Tracht, Winter Springs Police Department, then reviewed the case information and history and noted the property had been in compliance since May 11, 2021. . Ms. Sherry Clifton, 2154 Pope Avenue, South Daytona, Florida noted she was the personal representative for the estate which had belonged to her brother who was recently deceased. Ms. Clifton noted repairs that have been completed, violations she had seen at other properties on the street, and her hope that the City would grant her request for abatement. Discussion followed on the current status of the property, the intentions of renting versus selling the property to a potential homestead buyer, if Code Enforcement had been in contact with Mr. Hall, and more general questions about liens. Ms. Clifton noted that she had no definite plans currently regarding selling or maintaining the property. Several Commissioners expressed a desire to not make any decision at the current time to allow for Ms. Clifton to gather more information and potentially make decisions about what she wanted to do with the property. Attorney Garganese noted that, if it were the will of the Commission, a motion could be made to postpone the item to a date certain or to table the item. Ms. Clifton asked that the Commission allow her to pay $3500.00 and to move on. 123 CITY COMMISSION MINUTES | REGULAR MEETING | MONDAY, AUGUST 9, 2021 | PAGE 9 OF 13 Continuing, Ms. Clifton spoke about the process in other cities and shared some frustration about the prospect of coming back before the Commission. Discussion turned again to the desire for more information with several Commissioners reiterating that they wanted to give Ms. Clifton time to assess the situation and gather information. "MOTION TO POSTPONE FURTHER CONSIDERATION OF LIEN APPEAL FOR PERIOD OF UP TO 120 DAYS OR UNTIL SUCH TIME AS APPLICANT HAS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATES TO CITY MANAGER." MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CANNON. SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER BENTON. DISCUSSION. VOTE: HALE (AYE); BENTON (AYE); ELLIOTT (AYE); CANNON (AYE); JOHNSON (AYE) MOTION CARRIED 5-0. 504) New Business Commissioner Elliott brought up the idea of a “Fifth Quarter” which would provide a safe space for high school students to gather after Friday night football games. Several Commissioners were supportive of the idea and staff noted that they would look into it. Commissioner Hale noted the City’s recent purchase of a house on Flamingo Road and shared her ideas for turning it into an art space with community gardens in the back. Manager Boyle noted that any plans for proposed uses would come before the Commission for approval. Deputy Mayor Johnson noted that having one meeting a month was becoming difficult due to the amount that needed to be discussed and asked that this be reconsidered, especially in May and August. Commissioner Cannon echoed the Deputy Mayor’s concerns and asked that staff place a discussion on revisiting the meeting calendar on the agenda for the next Commission meeting. 302) Contract with the Seminole County Sheriff’s Office for Dispatch Service Consolidation Commissioner Cannon noted he was supportive of the contract, asked about changes to the way non-emergency calls would be handled and the potential impacts on quality of call responses. 124 CITY COMMISSION MINUTES | REGULAR MEETING | MONDAY, AUGUST 9, 2021 | PAGE 10 OF 13 Chief Deisler noted these would not be issues and no negative impacts were expected in this transition. Discussion followed on the timeline for transitioning and several Commissioners expressed interest in touring the Communications Center in the future. "MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 302 AND THE CONTRACT BETWEEN WINTER SPRINGS POLICE DEPARTMENT AND THE SEMINOLE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE.” MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CANNON. SECONDED BY DEPUTY MAYOR JOHNSON. DISCUSSION. VOTE: ELLIOTT (AYE); HALE (AYE); JOHNSON (AYE); CANNON (AYE); BENTON (AYE) MOTION CARRIED 5-0 ADD-ON ITEM) Appointments to City Boards and Committees “MOTION TO APPOINT KAREN OWENS TO THE PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE.” MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CANNON. SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER ELLIOTT. DISCUSSION. MOTION PASSED WITH UNANIMOUS CONSENT. “MOTION TO APPOINT MATTHEW JIA TO THE YOUTH COUNCIL.” MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CANNON. SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER ELLIOTT. DISCUSSION. MOTION PASSED WITH UNANIMOUS CONSENT. “MOTION TO APPOINT HOWARD PARSONS TO THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD.” MOTION BY DEPUTY MAYOR JOHNSON. SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER ELLIOTT. DISCUSSION. MOTION PASSED WITH UNANIMOUS CONSENT. “MOTION TO REAPPOINT DENNIS ROBINSON TO THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD.” MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HALE. SECONDED BY DEPUTY MAYOR JOHNSON. DISCUSSION. MOTION PASSED WITH UNANIMOUS CONSENT. 125 CITY COMMISSION MINUTES | REGULAR MEETING | MONDAY, AUGUST 9, 2021 | PAGE 11 OF 13 •Introduced new Assistant Director of Public Works, Mr. Jason Norberg and briefly reviewed his background. •Noted the food truck event which was set to occur on August 19, 2021 at Torcaso Park •Provided an update on American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds. Manager Boyle noted the contract should be seen in the coming weeks and that $15.8 million was expected to come to the City. •Noted August 30, 2021 Special Meeting was being requested for special acquisition of supplies, and to continue the discussion about the UCF Incubator •Asked for consensus on a list of names to issue administrative subpoenas and for an agreeable date to hold the Special Meeting. Consensus was that the meeting would be held on Monday, September 20, 2021. "I’LL MAKE A MOTION THAT KIP LOCKUFF, BRIAN FIELDS, KEVIN SMITH, TERRY ZAUDTKE, DAVID GIERACH, MAYOR LACEY, COMMISSIONER KREBS, COMMISSIONER BROWN RESNICK GREENBERG, AND COMMISSIONER HOVEY BE SUBPOENAED TO COME BEFORE THE COMMISSION FOR PURPOSES OF INVESTIGATION REGARDING THE $3.5 MILLION DOLLAR LAKE JESUP REUSE WATER PLANT." MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CANNON. SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER HALE. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ON THE POTENTIAL CONSEQUENCES OF INDIVIDUALS NOT SHOWING FOR THE MEETING. VOTE: BENTON (AYE); CANNON (AYE); JOHNSON (AYE); HALE (AYE); ELLIOTT (AYE) MOTION CARRIED 5-0. 601) City Attorney Anthony A. Garganese •No report 602) City Clerk Christian Gowan •Advised that staff was looking at dates in September for the annual Board Appreciation Dinner. o Discussion followed on COVID concerns and staff, with the consensus of the Commission, agreed to tentatively schedule the dinner for Friday, November 19, 2021. 603) Seat One Commissioner Matt Benton •No report REPORTS 600) City Manager Shawn Boyle 126 CITY COMMISSION MINUTES | REGULAR MEETING | MONDAY, AUGUST 9, 2021 | PAGE 12 OF 13 •Shared that he was recently on vacation and was glad to be able to take several day hikes on the Appalachian Trail. 605) Seat Three Commissioner/Deputy Mayor Ted Johnson •No report 606) Seat Four Commissioner TiAnna Hale •No report 607) Seat Five Commissioner Rob Elliott •Noted meetings with Jesup’s Reserve and Winter Springs Village Homeowner’s Associations to hear their concerns. •Updated the Commission on the Helping Hands initiative and indicated that good progress was being made •Noted he was working with Chief Deisler to help with the selection of a chaplain for the Winter Springs Police Department. 608) Mayor Kevin McCann •Noted his appreciation for the trust placed in him to represent Winter Springs and his continued efforts to meet with officials throughout the County PUBLIC INPUT Mr. Ron Ligthart, 1036 Winding Water Circle, Winter Springs noted he liked WastePro. In regards to the UCF Incubator, noted he had been disappointed how many times the Commission had expressed concerns but not taken action. ADJOURNMENT Mayor McCann adjourned the meeting at 11:45 PM. 604) Seat Two Commissioner Kevin Cannon 127 CITY COMMISSION MINUTES | REGULAR MEETING | MONDAY, AUGUST 9, 2021 | PAGE 13 OF 13 ____________________________________ CHRISTIAN GOWAN CITY CLERK APPROVED: ____________________________________ MAYOR KEVIN MCCANN NOTE: These Minutes were approved at the _________________, 2021 City Commission Regular Meeting. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: 128 PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM 400 CITY COMMISSION AGENDA | SEPTEMBER 13, 2021 REGULAR MEETING TITLE Tentative Millage Rate for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 and Related Advertising SUMMARY The City Manager is requesting that the City Commission hold a Public Hearing relative to the approval of Resolution 2021-12, which establishes the Tentative Operating Millage Rate for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 for the City of Winter Springs. The proposed operating millage rate established by the Commission on July 12, 2021 (millage cap) was set at 2.4100 mills as submitted on the DR- 420. The proposed operating millage rate is 4.21% more than the rolled-back rate of 2.3127 mills. It is recommended that the tentative operating millage rate not vary from the proposed operating millage rate of 2.4100 mills. The decision to levy an operating millage rate of 2.4100 mills as opposed to the rolled-back rate of 2.3127 mills will result in additional ad valorem General Fund revenue of $369,257 (net of statutory discount). Any subsequent revisions by the City Commission to the tentative millage rates and/or the tentative budget will be reflected in the Final Millage and Final Budget Hearings scheduled for September 27, 2021 at 6:30 P.M. However, the tentative operating millage rate that is established cannot be exceeded at the final hearing. As such, it is recommended that the City Commission set the tentative operating millage rate equivalent to the proposed operating millage cap of 2.4100 mills. The City Commission may reduce the operating millage rate at the final hearing. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Commission dopt Resolution 2021-12, which establishes the Tentative Operating Millage Rate for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 for the City of Winter Springs at 2.4100 mills which is 4.21% more than the rolled‐ back rate of 2.3127 mills and authorize the City to advertise in a newspaper of general circulation the City's intent to hold public hearings to adopt final millage rate and final budget in compliance with Florida Statute 200.065. 129 A ' sample' motion which includes the necessary elements for statutory compliance is as follows: I move to approve Resolution 2021-12 establishing the tentative Fiscal Year 2021- 2022 operating millage rate for the City of Winter Springs at 2.4100 mills and publicly announce that the tentative operating millage rate of 2.4100 mills is 4.21% greater than the computed rolled-back rate of 2.3127 mills and authorizing advertisement of the City's intent to hold public hearings to adopt the final millage rate and budget. 130 City of Winter Springs, Florida Resolution 2021-12 Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION 2021-12 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA, ADOPTING THE TENTATIVE OPERATING MILLAGE RATE FOR THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING ON OCTOBER 1, 2021 AND ENDING ON SEPTEMBER 30, 2022; ANNOUNCING THE PERCENTAGE BY WHICH THE TENTATIVE OPERATING MILLAGE RATE IS MORE THAN THE ROLLED-BACK RATE; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF PRIOR INCONSISTENT RESOLUTIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs has held a public hearing on the tentative millage rates pursuant to Florida Statute 200.065, Subparagraph (c); WHEREAS, the City Commission of Winter Springs desires to adopt the tentative operating millage rate and publicly announce the percentage change by which the tentative proposed operating millage rate is more than the rolled-back rate; WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs deems that this Resolution is in the best interest of the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Winter Springs; and WHEREAS, the gross taxable value for operating purposes not exempt from taxation within Winter Springs has been certified by the Seminole County Property Appraiser to the City of Winter Springs on line 4 of the DR420 as $2,867,838,505. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are deemed true and correct and are hereby fully incorporated by this reference. Section 2. Tentative Millage. The City Commission adopts its tentative operating millage rate of 2.4100 for the fiscal year commencing October 1, 2021 and ending September 30, 2022. Section 3. Rolled-back Rate. The tentative operating millage rate of 2.4100 mills is more than the computed rolled-back rate of 2.3127 by 4.21%. Section 4. Advertisement. Within fifteen (15) days of the date of this Resolution, the Finance Department shall advertise in a newspaper of general circulation its intent to finally adopt the millage rates and budget and shall hold a public hearing to adopt the millage rates and finalize the budget not less than two (2) days or more than five (5) days after the date the advertisement is first published. 131 City of Winter Springs, Florida Resolution 2021-12 Page 2 of 2 Section 5. Repeal of Prior Inconsistent Resolutions. All prior resolutions or parts of resolutions in conflict herewith are hereby repealed to the extent of the conflict. Section 6. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, word, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion hereto. Section 7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption by the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida. RESOLVED by the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, in a regular meeting assembled on this 13th day of September, 2021. Kevin McCann, Mayor ATTEST: Christian Gowan, City Clerk Approved as to legal form and sufficiency for The City of Winter Springs only: Anthony A. Garganese, City Attorney 132 PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM 401 CITY COMMISSION AGENDA | SEPTEMBER 13, 2021 REGULAR MEETING TITLE Tentative Budget for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 and Related Advertising SUMMARY The City Manager is requesting that the City Commission hold a Public Hearing relative to the approval of Resolution 2021-13, establishing the Tentative Budget for fiscal year 2021-2022. The City-Wide Tentative Budget by fund type currently reflects the following appropriations to/(from) fund balance and the changes from the Proposed Budget (July 1 transmission) are summarized in an attachment entitled Revisions subsequent to the 2021-2022 Proposed Budget are as follows: General Fund - $0 Governmental Funds (exclusive of General Fund) - ($7,619,907) Enterprise Funds - ($6,128,387) The Proposed and Tentative Budgets are on the City's website at www.winterspringsfl.org/budget. Any subsequent revisions by the City Commission to the Tentative Budget and/or the Tentative Millage Rate will be reflected in the Final Millage and Final Budget Hearings scheduled for September 27, 2021 at 6:30 P.M. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Commission approve the Tentative Budget for the Fiscal Year 2021-2022 or amend it as it deems necessary. It is recommended the Commission adopt Resolution 2021-13, establishing the Tentative Budget for the Fiscal Year 2021-2022 as approved by the Commission and authorize the City to advertise its intent to hold public hearings to adopt the final millage rate and final budget. The advertisement will include a budget summary in a newspaper of general circulation in compliance with Florida Statute. 133 A 'sample' motion which includes the necessary elements for statutory compliance is as follows: I move to approve Resolution 2021-13, establishing the Tentative Budget for the City of Winter Springs for the fiscal year commencing on October 1, 2021 and ending on September 30, 2022 and authorizing advertisement of the City's intent to hold public hearings to adopt the final millage rate and budget. 134 City of Winter Springs, Florida Resolution 2021-13 Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION 2021-13 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA, ADOPTING THE TENTATIVE BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING ON OCTOBER 1, 2021 AND ENDING ON SEPTEMBER 30, 2022; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF PRIOR INCONSISTENT RESOLUTIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs has adopted a tentative operating millage rate at a public hearing pursuant to Florida Statute 200.065, Subparagraph (c); WHEREAS, the City Commission desires to adopt the tentative budget; and WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs deems that this Resolution is in the best interest of the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Winter Springs. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are deemed true and correct and are hereby fully incorporated by this reference. Section 2. Tentative Budget. Having previously adopted a tentative millage rate for the City of Winter Springs for fiscal year 2021-2022, the City Commission adopts its tentative budget as may be amended for the fiscal year commencing October l, 2021 and ending September 30, 2022 as presented at its regularly-scheduled Public Hearing assembled on the date of this Resolution, with all amendments, if any, adopted at that meeting. Section 3. Proposed Expenditures. The proposed expenditures in the tentative budget including inter-fund transfers are as follows: General Fund - $18,736,477; Other Governmental Funds - $15,065,478; Enterprise Funds - $20,705,315. The budget is based upon gross taxable value as reported by the Seminole County Property Appraiser on line 4 of the DR420 as $2,867,838,505. Section 4. Advertisement. Within fifteen (15) days of the date of this Resolution, the Finance Department shall advertise in a newspaper of general circulation its intent to finally adopt the millage rates and budget and shall hold a public hearing to adopt the millage rates and finalize the budget not less than two (2) days or more than five (5) days after the date the advertisement is published. 135 City of Winter Springs, Florida Resolution 2021-13 Page 2 of 2 Section 5. Repeal of Prior Inconsistent Resolutions. All prior resolutions or parts of resolutions in conflict herewith are hereby repealed to the extent of the conflict. Section 6. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, word, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion hereto. Section 7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption by the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida. RESOLVED by the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, in a regular meeting assembled on this 13th day of September 2021. Kevin McCann, Mayor ATTEST: Christian Gowan, City Clerk Approved as to legal form and sufficiency for The City of Winter Springs only: Anthony A. Garganese, City Attorney 136 Revisions subsequent to the 2021-2022 Proposed Budget Expenditures/Transfers per Resolution 2021-13 General Fund Other Governmental Funds Enterprise Funds Total Revenues/Transfers - Proposed $18,736,477 $7,427,571 $14,552,928 $40,716,976 Revisions since Proposed: Interest/Other Earnings missed in the proposed budget (121)$18,000 $18,000 Interest/Other Earnings missed in the proposed budget (411)$12,000 $12,000 Interest/Other Earnings missed in the proposed budget (420)$12,000 $12,000 Revenues/Transfers - Tentative $18,736,477 $7,445,571 $14,576,928 $40,758,976 Expenditures/Transfers - Proposed $18,736,477 $15,073,912 $20,705,315 $54,515,704 Revisions since Proposed: Police Dispatch to Seminole County (2140)($220,605)($220,605) Solid Waste parks pickup transfer to Fund 120 ($30,736) $30,736 $0 Small tools move from capital fund 303 not an eligible expense $39,170 ($39,170)$0 CM Contingency $212,171 $212,171 Expenditures/Transfers - Tentative $18,736,477 $15,065,478 $20,705,315 $54,507,270 Appropriation to (from) Fund Balance $0 ($7,619,907) ($6,128,387) ($13,748,294) 137 PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM 402 CITY COMMISSION AGENDA | SEPTEMBER 13, 2021 REGULAR MEETING TITLE Review of Ordinance 2021-06 an Ordinance of the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, amending the text of the City’s Comprehensive Plan to include a Property Rights Element as required by law; providing for the repeal of prior inconsistent ordinances and resolutions, incorporation into the comprehensive plan, severability and an effective date and legal status of the plan amendment. SUMMARY In accordance with the provisions of SB 59 (Fla. Stat. § 163.3177(6)(i)), passed during the 2021 Legislative Session, the Florida Legislature adopted, and Governor DeSantis signed into law, Chapter 2021-195, Laws of Florida requiring local governments to amend their comprehensive plans to include a property rights element. The City of Winter Springs recognizes the importance of property rights and desires to expeditiously comply with the new law by adding a Property Rights Element to its Comprehensive Plan. The proposed Ordinance requires several publicly noticed and advertised public hearings including one (1) hearing before the City’s Planning and Zoning Board/Land Planning Agency and two (2) hearings before the City Commission. The City's Land Planning Agency reviewed and unanimously recommended approval the Ordinance at the August 5, 2021 Planning and Zoning/Local Planning Agency meeting. The proposed Ordinance was advertised in the Orlando Sentinel on July 26, 2021. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Commission approve First Reading of Ordinance 2021-06 amending the Comprehensive Plan to create a Property Rights Element in accordance with Chapter 2021-195, Laws of Florida, and authorize transmittal to the Department of Economic Opportunity and other reviewing agencies as required by law. 138 City of Winter Springs Ordinance No. 2021-06 Page 1 of 4 ORDINANCE NO. 2021-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE CITY’S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO INCLUDE A PROPERTY RIGHTS ELEMENT AS REQUIRED BY LAW; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF PRIOR INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS, INCORPORATION INTO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, SEVERABILITY AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND LEGAL STATUS OF THE PLAN AMENDMENT. WHEREAS, section 163.3161 et. seq., Florida Statutes, established the Community Planning Act, which was formerly known as the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Act requires each municipality in the State of Florida to prepare, adopt, and update a Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, during the 2021 Legislative Session, the Florida Legislature adopted, and Governor DeSantis signed into law, Chapter 2021-195, Laws of Florida requiring local governments to amend their comprehensive plans to include a property rights element; and WHEREAS, the City of Winter Springs recognizes the importance of property rights and desires to expeditiously comply with the new law by adding a property rights element to its Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of the Community Planning Act, the City’s Land Planning Agency has reviewed and made a recommendation regarding this Ordinance at a duly held public meeting as required by law; and WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs held two duly noticed public hearings on the proposed amendment set forth hereunder and considered findings and advice of staff, citizens, and all interested parties submitting written and oral comments and supporting data and analysis, and after complete deliberation, hereby approves and adopts the Comprehensive Plan Amendment set forth hereunder; and WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, hereby finds this Ordinance to be in the best interests of the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Winter Springs; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are hereby fully incorporated herein by this reference as legislative findings and the intent and purpose of the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs. 139 City of Winter Springs Ordinance No. 2021-06 Page 2 of 4 Section 2. Authority. This Ordinance is adopted in compliance with, and pursuant to, the Community Planning Act, sections 163.3161 et. seq., Florida Statutes, and Chapter 2021-195, Laws of Florida. Section 3. Purpose and Intent. It is hereby declared to be the purpose and intent of this Ordinance to adopt a comprehensive plan amendment incorporating the revisions stated herein as part of the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan. Section 4. Addition of Property Rights Element. The City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended as set forth below (underlined type indicates additions and strikeout type indicates deletions, while *** indicate deletions from the text of this Ordinance that shall remain unchanged in the City’s Comprehensive Plan): City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan * * * CHAPTER X PROPERTY RIGHTS ELEMENT A. GOALS, OBJECTIVES and POLICIES GOAL 1: The City will respect judicially acknowledged and constitutionally protected private property rights. Objective 1.1: The City will consider when appropriate and applicable judicially acknowledged and constitutionally protected private property rights when making decisions. Policy 1.1.1: In accordance with Florida law requiring governmental entities to respect judicially acknowledged and constitutionally protected private property rights, the following rights shall be considered in local decisionmaking: 1. The right of a property owner to physically possess and control his or her interests in the property, including easements, leases, or mineral rights. 2. The right of a property owner to use, maintain, develop, and improve his or her property for personal use or for the use of any other person, subject to state law and local ordinances. 3. The right of the property owner to privacy and to exclude others from the property to protect the owner's possessions and property. 4. The right of a property owner to dispose of his or her property through sale or gift. 140 City of Winter Springs Ordinance No. 2021-06 Page 3 of 4 Section 5. Repeal of Prior Inconsistent Ordinances and Resolutions. All prior inconsistent ordinances and resolutions adopted by the City Commission, or parts or ordinances and resolutions in conflict herewith, are hereby repealed to the extent of the conflict. Section 6. Incorporation into Comprehensive Plan. Upon the effective date of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment adopted by this Ordinance, said Amendment shall be incorporated into the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan and any section or paragraph number or letter and any heading may be changed or modified as necessary to effectuate the foregoing. Section 7. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, word, or provision of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, whether for substantive, procedural, or any other reason, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. Section 8. Effective Date. The effective date of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment adopted by this Ordinance shall be thirty-one (31) days after the state land planning agency notifies the City that the plan amendment package is complete pursuant to section 163.3184(3)(c)(4.), Florida Statutes. If the plan amendment is timely challenged, the plan amendment shall not become effective until the state land planning agency or the Administration Commission enters a final order determining the adopted amendment to be in compliance. No development orders, development permits, or land use dependent on this plan amendment may be issued before it has become effective. After and from the effective date of this plan amendment, the Comprehensive Plan Amendment set forth herein shall amend the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan and become a part of that plan and the plan amendment shall have the legal status of the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan, as amended. ADOPTED by the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, in a regular meeting assembled on the _____ day of ______________, 2021. Kevin McCann, Mayor ATTEST: Christian Gowan, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND SUFFICIENCY FOR THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS ONLY: _________________________________ Anthony A. Garganese, City Attorney 141 City of Winter Springs Ordinance No. 2021-06 Page 4 of 4 Legal Ad: _______________ First Reading: Second Reading: 142 By Rebecca Santana Associated PressRobert Moses, a civil rights activist who endured beatings and jail while lead-ing Black voter registration drives in the South during the 1960s and later helped improve minority educa-tion in math, died Sunday. He was 86. Moses worked to disman-tle segregation as the Missis-sippi field director of the Student Non-Violent Coor-dinating Committee during the civil rights movement and was central to the 1964 “Freedom Summer” in which hundreds of students went to the South to register voters.Moses started his “second chapter in civil rights work” by founding in 1982 the Algebra Project thanks to a MacArthur Fellowship. The project included a curricu-lum Moses developed to help poor students succeed in math.Ben Moynihan, the direc-tor of operations for the Algebra Project, said he had talked with Moses’ wife, Dr. Janet Moses, and she said her husband had passed away in Hollywood, Florida. Information was not given as to the cause of death.Moses was born in Harlem, New York, on Jan. 23, 1935, two months after a race riot left three dead and injured 60 in the neigh-borhood. His grandfather, William Henry Moses, has been a prominent South-ern Baptist preacher and a supporter of Marcus Garvey, a Black nationalist leader at the turn of the century. But like many Black fami-lies, the Moses family moved north from the South during the Great Migration. Once in Harlem, his family sold milk from a Black-owned cooperative to help supplement the house-hold income, according to “Robert Parris Moses: A Life in Civil Rights and Leader-ship at the Grassroots,” by Laura Visser-Maessen.While attending Hamil-ton College in Clinton, New York, he became a Rhodes Scholar and was influenced by the work of French philosopher Albert Camus and his ideas of rationality and moral purity for social change. Moses then took part in a Quaker-sponsored trip to Europe and solidified his beliefs that change came from the bottom up before earning a master’s in philos-ophy at Harvard University.Moses didn’t spend much time in the Deep South until he went on a recruiting trip in 1960 to “see the move-ment for myself.”He sought out the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s Southern Christian Leader-ship Conference in Atlanta but found little activity in the office and soon turned his attention to SNCC.“I was taught about the denial of the right to vote behind the Iron Curtain in Europe,” Moses later said. “I never knew that there was (the) denial of the right to vote behind a Cotton Curtain here in the United States.” The young civil rights advocate tried to register Blacks to vote in Missis-sippi’s rural Amite County where he was beaten and arrested. He later helped organize the Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party, which sought to challenge the all-white Democratic dele-gation from Mississippi. But President Lyndon Johnson prevented the group of rebel Democrats from voting in the convention and instead let Jim Crown southerners remain, drawing national attention.Disillusioned with white liberal reaction to the civil rights movement, Moses soon began taking part in demonstrations against the Vietnam War then cut off all relationships with whites, even former SNCC members.Moses worked as a teacher in Tanzania, Africa, returned to Harvard to earn a doctorate in philoso-phy and taught high school math in Cambridge, Massa-chusetts. Later in life, Moses started his “second chapter in civil rights work” by founding in 1982 the Algebra Project. ROBERT PARRIS MOSES 1935-2021Civil rights activist led voter registration drives in SouthRobert Moses addresses the 1964 “Freedom Summer” during a national youth summit in Mississippi. ROGELIO V. SOLIS 2014EZ-Payis the easy way to pay your subscription!Call407-420-5353and sign up TODAY! R8 Orlando Sentinel | Section 1 | Monday, July 26, 2021 + First to KNOW. First to ACT. First to PROSPER. growth /gr TH/ noun the process of increasing in amount, value or importance spot • ter /späd r/ noun the early bird who catches the worm and wins Add GrowthSpotter to Yo ur Vocabulary and Your Toolbox Discover More at GrowthSpotter.com/SignUp NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ADOPTION OF THE FISCAL YEAR 2021/2022 BUDGET;NOTICE OF PUBLICHEARINGTOCONSIDERTHEIMPOSITIONOFOPERATIONSANDMAINTENANCESPECIALASSESSMENTS,ADOPTION OF ANASSESSMENTROLL,ANDTHE LEVY,COLLECTION,ANDENFORCEMENT OF THE SAME;AND NOTICEOF REGULAR BOARD OFSUPERVISORS’MEETING.Upcoming Public Hearings,and Regular MeetingTheBoardofSupervisors(“Board”)for the HarmonyWest Community Development District (“District”)will hold two publichearingsandaregularmeetingonAugust19,2021 at 1:30p.m.,andlocatedatJohnston’sSurveying,Inc.,900 CrossPrairieParkway,Kissimmee,Florida 34744.The first public hearing is being held pursuant to Chapter 190,Florida Statutes,to receive public comment and objectionsontheDistrict’sproposed budget (“Proposed Budget”)for the fiscal yearbeginning October 1,2021 and ending September 30,2022 (“Fiscal Year2021/2022”).Thesecond public hearingis being heldpursuant to Chapters 190 and 197,Florida Statutes,toconsidertheimpositionofoperationsandmaintenancespecialassessments(“O&M Assessments”)uponthe landslocated withintheDistrict,tofundtheProposed Budget forFiscalYear 2021/2022;to considerthe adoption of anassessment roll;and,toprovideforthelevy,collection,and enforcement of assessments.At the conclusion of the hearings,the Board will,by resolution,adopt abudgetandlevyO&M Assessments as finally approved by the Board.ABoard meeting of the District will also be held where theBoardmayconsideranyotherDistrictbusiness.DescriptionofAssessmentsTheDistrictimposesO&M Assessments on benefitted property within the District for the purpose of funding the District’sgeneraladministrative,operations,and maintenance budget.Ageographic depiction of the property potentially subject to theproposedO&M Assessments is identified in the mapattached hereto.The tablebelowshows the schedule of the proposed O&MAssessments,which are subjectto changeat thehearing:ProductType Total Lots /Acres Proposed FY 2021/2022 O&M AssessmentPlattedLot620lots$610.97 per lot*Unplatted Lots 1,143 lots $49.85 per lot*Includes County collection costsand early payment discounts.Lots are allocated an equal share of the O&M Assessments on aper lot basis,while unplatted lands are allocated aportionoftheadministrativeexpensesoftheO&M Assessments on aper acre basis (and based on planned units).Pursuant to Section197.3632(4),Florida Statutes,the lien amount shall serve asthe“maximum rate”authorizedbylawfor O&M Assessments,suchthatnoassessmenthearingshallbeheldornoticeprovidedinfutureyearsunlesstheassessmentsareproposedtobeincreasedoranothercriterionwithinSection197.3632(4),Florida Statutes,ismet.NotethattheO&MAssessments are in addition toanydebtserviceassessmentspreviouslyleviedbytheDistrictandduetobecollectedforFiscalYear2021/2022.ForFiscal Year 2021/2022,the District intends to have the County tax collector collect the assessments imposed on certaindevelopedproperty.Itisimportant to pay your assessment because failure to pay will cause ataxcertificate to be issued againstthepropertywhichmayresultinlossoftitle,or for direct billed assessments,may result in aforeclosure action,which alsomayresultinalossoftitle.The District’sdecision tocollect assessments on the tax rollorby direct billing does not precludetheDistrictfromlaterelectingtocollectthoseorotherassessmentsinadifferentmanneratafuturetime.Additional ProvisionsThepublichearingsandmeetingareopentothepublicandwillbeconducted in accordance with the provisions of Floridalaw.Acopy of the Proposed Budget,proposed assessment roll,and the agenda for the hearings and meeting may be obtainedattheofficesoftheDistrictManager,located at c/o Wrathell,Hunt and Associates,LLC,2300 Glades Road,Suite410W,BocaRaton,Florida 33431,phone:561-571-0010 (“District Manager’sOffice”),during normal business hours.The public hearingsandmeetingmaybecontinuedtoadate,time,and place tobe specified on the recordatthe hearings or meeting.There may beoccasionswhenstafforboardmembersmayparticipatebyspeakertelephone.Anyperson requiring special accommodations at this meeting because of adisability or physical impairmentshouldcontacttheDistrictManager’sOffice at least forty-eight (48)hours prior to the meeting.If you are hearing or speech impaired,pleasecontacttheFloridaRelayServicebydialing7-1-1,or 1-800-955-8771 (TTY)/1-800-955-8770 (Voice),for aid in contacting theDistrictManager’sOffice.Please note thatall affected property owners have the right to appear atthe public hearings and meeting,andmay also filewrittenobjectionswiththeDistrictManager’sOffice within twenty days of publication of this notice.Eachperson who decidestoappealanydecisionmadebytheBoardwithrespecttoanymatterconsideredatthepublichearingsormeetingisadvisedthatpersonwillneedarecordofproceedingsandthataccordingly,the person may need to ensure thataverbatim record of theproceedingsismade,includingthetestimonyand evidenceupon which such appeal is tobe based.District ManagerHARMONYWESTCOMMUNITYDEVELOPMENTDISTRICTFROM TRASH TO TREASUREFind yours in the Classified Garage Sales listings.ONLINEOrlando Sentinel Classified Automotive ads can be seen on OrlandoSentinel.com and Cars.com. When it’s time to sell your vehicle, give us a call and place your ad in the paper and online! Call 1-800-669-5757 or visit OrlandoSentinel.com/advertiseINVITATION TO BIDMiddlesex invites all City of Orlando, Orange Co., and FDOT D/M/WBE certified subcontractors and suppliers to bid CFX SR 408 RESURFACING FROM YUCATAN DR. TO W OF SR 417 in Orange Co., FL Project No. 408-763. Project consists of M.O.T, erosion control, milling, excavation, fill material, rumble strips, shoulder gutter, guardrail, limerock base & limerock & asphalt trucking, QC/QA, sodding, signs and pavement markings. Bid Documents are available for review at our office at 10801 Cosmonaut Blvd, Orlando, FL 32824 and our ftp site: https://themiddlesexcorporation.box.com/v/floridabidsPlease submit your proposal before August 3, 2021 @ 2:00 PM, email, or hand delivery. For inquiries contact us Jay Poon @ 407-515-3588 or jpoon@middlesexco.comOS7003632 7/26 8/1/21REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS CONTINUING SERVICE CONTRACT FOR CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES RFQ # SDOC-22-Q-024-CH-FPCThe School Board of Osceola County, Florida announces that proposals are being solicited for Continuing Service Contract for Civil Engineering Services. Submittal deadline is August 18, 2021. The solicitation may be downloaded from the District’s web site: https://vendorlink.osceola.org/common/login.aspxShould you have questions in regards to this solicitation, please contact:Cheryl Hood, Supervisor of PurchasingSchool District of Osceola County817 Bill Beck Blvd.Kissimmee, Florida 34744Email: cheryl.hood@osceolaschools.net Phone: 407.870-4627Fax: 407.870.4616Hours: 8:00 a.m.-4:30 p.m./Monday-FridayAn Equal Opportunity AgencyOS6999886 07/26, 08/01, 08/09/21 NOTICE UNDER FICTITIOUS NAMETO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the under- signed pursuant to the “Fictitious Name Statute”, Chapter 865.09, Flori- da Statutes, will register with the Divi- sion of Corporations, Department of State, State of Florida upon receipt of this notice. the fictitious name, to-wit:MMAunder which (I am) (we are) engaged in business at 849 Cypress Pkwy Suite 411, Kissimmee FL 34759 That the (party) (parties) interested in said business enterprise is as follows:MICRO MOBILITY ASSOCIATION LLC 849 CYPRESS PKWY. 411Dated at KISSIMMEE, Osceola County , Florida, 07/26/2021OSC7003701 7/26/2021NOTICE UNDER FICTITIOUS NAMETO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the under- signed pursuant to the “Fictitious Name Statute”, Chapter 865.09, Flori- da Statutes, will register with the Divi- sion of Corporations, Department of State, State of Florida upon receipt of this notice. the fictitious name, to-wit:DBC Seafoodunder which (I am) (we are) engaged in business at 14566 Magnolia Ridge Loop That the (party) (parties) interested in said business enterprise is as follows:Disbancor USA Inc 14566 Magnolia Ridge LoopDated at Winter Garden, Orange County , Florida, 07/23/2021ORG7003604 7/26/2021NOTICE UNDER FICTITIOUS NAMETO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the under- signed pursuant to the “Fictitious Name Statute”, Chapter 865.09, Flori- da Statutes, will register with the Divi- sion of Corporations, Department of State, State of Florida upon receipt of this notice. the fictitious name, to-wit:Oceans 88 Merchandisingunder which (I am) (we are) engaged in business at 260 S. Osceola Avenue, #1506, ORLANDO, FL 32801 That the (party) (parties) interested in said business enterprise is as follows:Inceptional, Inc. 260 S. Osceola Avenue, #1506, ORLANDO, FL 32801Dated at Orlando, Orange County , Florida, 07/23/2021OS7003437 07/26/21 MEETING NOTICE CENTRAL FLORIDA EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY THE CENTRAL FLORIDA EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY OPERATIONS COMMITTEE MEETING SCHEDULED FOR THURSDAY, JULY 29, 2021 AT 2:00 P.M. IS CANCELED. For Further Information Contact:Central Florida Expressway AuthorityPhone 407-690-5000Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes states that if a person decides to appeal any decision made by a board, agency, or commission with respect to any matter considered at a meeting or hearing, they will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purpose, they may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.Any written public comments that are to be submitted to the Operations Committee, shall be emailed to OperationsComments@cfxway.com and must be received 48 hours before the start of the meeting to be included as part of the record. All comments will be shared with Committee Members but only comments related to Committee items being voted upon will be included in the record. Please indicate the agenda item number related to your comments in your email subject heading.Persons who require translation services, which are provided at no cost, should contact CFX at (407) 690-5000 x5316 or by email at Iranetta.Dennis@cfxway.com at least three (3) business days prior to the event.In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if any person with a disability as defined by the ADA needs special accommodations to participate in this proceeding, then they should contact the Central Florida Expressway Authority at (407) 690-5000 no later than two (2) business days prior to the proceeding.Please note that participants ORANGE COUNTY HOUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ MEETINGDATE: August 4, 2021TIME: 8:30 A.M.PLACE: ORANGE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER COMMISSIONERS’ CHAMBERS, FIRST FL., 201 S. ROSALIND AVENUE - ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32801“SECTION 286.0105, F.S. STATES THAT IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY A BOARD, AGENCY, OR COMMISSION WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT A MEETING OR HEARING, HE WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS, AND THAT, FOR SUCH PURPOSE, HE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED.”OS6969117 7/26/2021 JOBS ONLINE Orlando Sentinel Classified employment ads can also be seen on OrlandoSentinel. com & Careerbuilder.com. When it’s time to find a new job look to Orlando Sentinel Classifieds! REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS CONTINUING SERVICE CONTRACT FOR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, MATERIALS TESTING AND THRESHOLD INSPECTION SERVICES RFQ # SDOC-22-Q-025-CH-FPCThe School Board of Osceola County, Florida announces that proposals are being solicited for Continuing Service Contract for Geotechnical Engineering, Materials Testing and Threshold Inspection Services. Submittal deadline is August 25, 2021. The solicitation may be downloaded from the District’s web site: https://vendorlink.osceola.org/common/login.aspx Should you have questions in regards to this solicitation, please contact: Cheryl Hood, Supervisor of PurchasingSchool District of Osceola County817 Bill Beck Blvd.Kissimmee, Florida 34744Email:cheryl.hood@osceolaschools.net Phone: 407.870-4627Fax: 407.870.4616Hours:8:00a.m.-4:30p.m./Monday-FridayAn Equal Opportunity Agency OS7002396 7/26, 8/1, 8/16/2021 NOTICE OF PUBLIC SALENotice is hereby given that the undersigned will sell, to satisfy lien of the owner, at public sale by competitive bidding on www.storagetreasures.com ending on August 13th, 2021 at 11:00 am for units located at: Compass Self Storage800 Greenway Professional Ct.Orlando, FL 32824 Purchases must be made with cash only and paid at the time of sale. All goods are sold as is and must be removed at the time of purchase. Compass Self Storage reserves the right to refuse any bid. Sale is subject to adjournment. The personal goods stored therein by the following may include, but are not limited to general household, furniture, boxes, clothes and appliances. 1717 Maria Sosa2418 Francisco Tejada2500 Jane Marie Rivera OS7000843 7/26/2021, 8/02/2021 NOTICE OF LANDOWNERS’ MEETING AND ELECTION OF THE MIDTOWN IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT Notice is hereby given to the public and all landowners within the Midtown Improvement District (the “District”), the location of which is generally described as comprising a parcel or parcels of land containing approximately 388.96 acres, generally located west of Narcoossee Road, north of the southernmost boundary of Orange County, east of Lake Nona Boulevard, and south of Nemours Parkway, in the City of Orlando, Florida, advising that a meeting of landowners will be held for the purpose of electing five (5) persons to the District Board of Supervisors.DATE: August 17, 2021TIME: 2:45 p.m.PLACE: Courtyard by Marriott Orlando Lake Nona6955 Lake Nona Blvd.Orlando, FL 32827Each landowner may vote in person or by written proxy. Proxy forms may be obtained upon request by contacting the office of the District Manager PFM Group Consulting LLC located at 12051 Corporate Blvd., Orlando, Florida 32817; (Ph): (407) 723-5935 (“District Office”). At said meeting each landowner or his or her proxy shall be entitled to nominate persons for the position of Supervisor and cast one vote per acre of land, or fractional portion thereof, owned by him or her and located within the District for each person to be elected to the position of Supervisor. A fraction of an acre shall be treated as one acre, entitling the landowner to one vote with respect thereto. Platted lots shall be counted individually and rounded up to the nearest whole acre. The acreage of platted lots shall not be aggregated for determining the number of voting units held by a landowner or a landowner’s proxy. At the landowners’ meeting the landowners shall select a person to serve as the meeting chair and who shall conduct the meeting. The landowners’ meeting is open to the public and will be conducted in accordance with the provisions of Florida law. The meeting may be continued to a date, time, and place to be specified on the record at such meeting. A copy of the agenda for this meeting may be obtained from the District Office. Any person requiring special accommodations to participate in these meetings is asked to contact the District Office at (Ph): (407) 723-5935, at least forty-eight (48) hours before the hearing. If you are hearing or speech impaired, please contact the Florida Relay Service at 7-1-1 or (800) 955-8770 for aid in contacting the District Office.A person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board with respect to any matter considered at the meeting is advised that such person will need a record of the proceedings and that accordingly, the person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, including the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Jennifer WaldenDistrict ManagerOS6994648 7/26 & 8/2/21 NOTICE OF PUBLIC SALE Notice of Public Auction to take place on Tuesday, July 27, 2021, at or after 10:00 AM at Vista AC Mini Storage located at 8701 W. Irlo Bronson Memorial Highway, Suite 210, Kissimmee, FL 34747, (407) 597-3123. A general description of the property that will be auctioned is as follows: Clothing, small appliances, and garden tools.Purchases must be made with either a money order or certified funds and paid at the time of the sale. Cash will not be accepted. All goods are sold as is and must be removed at the time of the purchase. Sale is subject to cancellation.OS6992720 7/12, 7/26/21CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/ LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY AND CITY COMMISSION PROPOSE TO CONSIDER: ORDINANCE NO. 2021-06AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE CITY’S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO INCLUDE A PROPERTY RIGHTS ELEMENT AS REQUIRED BY LAW; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF PRIOR INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS, INCORPORATION INTO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, SEVERABILITY AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND LEGAL STATUS OF THE PLAN AMENDMENT.PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD ON THURSDAY, AUGUST 5, 2020 AT 5:30 P.M. OR SOON THEREAFTER IN THE COMMISSION CHAMBERS LOCATED AT THE WINTER SPRINGS CITY HALL, 1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434, WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA.CITY COMMISSION TRANSMITTAL/FIRST READING PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD ON MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 2021 AT 6:30 P.M. OR SOON THEREAFTER IN THE COMMISSION CHAMBERS LOCATED AT WINTER SPRINGS CITY HALL, 1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434, WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA.The proposed ordinance may be inspected by interested parties between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, at the City’s Clerk’s Office, located at 1126 East State Road 434, Winter Springs, Florida. For more information call (407) 327-1800, Extension 253. Interested parties may appear at the meeting and be heard with respect to the proposed ordinance. Persons with disabilities needing assistance to participate in any of these proceedings should contact the Employee Relations Department Coordinator, 48 hours in advance of the meeting at (407) 327-1800, Extension 236. This is a public hearing. If you decide to appeal any recommendation/ decision made by the City Commission with respect to any matter considered at this meeting, you will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purposes, you may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made upon which the appeal is based. OS7001286 7/26/2021Please note that participants attending meetings held at the CFX Headquarters Building are subject to certain limitations and restrictions in order to adhere to the CDC guidelines and to ensure the safety and welfare of the public.OS7003614 7/26/21 Legal Notice forKevin Treto,M.D. Notice is herebygiven that Dr.Kevin Treto,M.D will be joining the practice of Vascular SpecialistsofCentral Florida as of August1,2021. Patients mayarrange forcarebycontacting: Vascular SpecialistsofCentral Florida 80 West Michigan Street,Orlando,FL 32806 (407)648-4323 www.arteryandvein.com 143 PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM 403 CITY COMMISSION AGENDA | SEPTEMBER 13, 2021 REGULAR MEETING TITLE Chase Bank - Aesthetic Plan Review, one Waiver, Final Engineering Review, and Development Agreement. SUMMARY The Community Development Department requests that the City Commission hold a Public Hearing to consider the Aesthetic Plan Review, one Waiver, Final Engineering Plans, and Development Agreement in order to construct a ±3,357 square foot (SF) financial institution (Chase Bank) with a drive-through within the Town Center District. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Commission recommend approval with conditions of the Aesthetic Plan Review, one Waiver, Final Engineering Plans, Development Agreement, and adopt the findings of the Staff Report in order to construct a ±3,357 square foot (SF) financial institution (Chase Bank) with a drive-through within the Town Center District. 1. Project approval is conditioned upon the execution of the Development Agreement and the terms and conditions contained therein. 2. The Developer shall include and install decorative street and traffic signs and light poles pursuant to Sec. 20-325(d) of the Town Center District Code acceptable to the City’s Community Development Director. 3. The trees proposed to be planted in the public right-of-way by the Developer shall be subject to the obligation of ongoing maintenance and replacement for the first two years following planting, at the Developer’s expense. If the City determines, after reasonable inspection, that any tree has become severely diseased or damaged to the point that the viability of the tree has been significantly compromised, the Developer shall be required to replace the tree. In the event that Developer fails to perform the necessary maintenance, repairs or replacements of any of the trees, the City shall have the right, but not obligation, to conduct said maintenance, repairs or replacements and recover the actual cost thereof from the Developer. Prior to exercising that right, the City shall provide the Developer written notice 144 and an explanation of the specific default and at least thirty (30) days in which to cure the default. If Developer fails to cure the default by the end of the cure period, the City may exercise its rights to maintain and replace at any time thereafter. 145 PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM CITY COMMISSION MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 2021 | REGULAR MEETING TITLE Chase Bank - Aesthetic Plan Review, one Waiver, Final Engineering Review, and Development Agreement. SUMMARY The Community Development Department requests that the City Commission hold a Public Hearing to consider the Aesthetic Plan Review, one Waiver, Final Engineering Plans, and Development Agreement in order to construct a ±3,357 square foot (SF) financial institution (Chase Bank) with a drive-through within the Town Center District. General Information Applicant Kimley-Horn and Associates | Dawn M. Dodge, P.E. Property Owner(s) JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association Location E. State Road 434 Winter Springs, FL 32708 Tract Size ±0.70 Acres Parcel ID Number 06-21-31-507-0000-0010 Zoning Designation Town Center District (T-C) | T5 Transect | Urban Center Zone FLUM Designation Town Center District Adjacent Land Use North: Town Center District East: Town Center District South: Town Center District West: Town Center District Principle building setbacks (from property line) Front/principle plane: 25 ft. min. - 50 ft. max (from front property line) Rear: 15 ft. (from rear property line) Side: 5 ft. min, 100 ft. max. (from side property line) Frontage buildout: 20% min. (at front setback) Development Standards Lot Width: 18 ft. min., 180 ft. max. Lot Depth: 30 ft. min., 160 ft. max. Lot Coverage: 100% max. 2 stories minimum 3 stories maximum Development Permits Not applicable | Vacant Development Agreement Development Agreement | July 31, 2020 (Conditional Use) Development Agreement | Pending (Final Engineering) 146 PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM | MONDAY, SEPTEMBE 13, 2021 | PAGE 2 OF 17 Code Enforcement Not applicable City Liens Not applicable Background Data: The subject property is a lot of record located at the NW corner of E. State Road 434 and Sea Hawk Cove, Winter Springs, FL 32708. The applicant is proposing a financial institution (Chase Bank) with a drive-through within the Town Center District. On November 16, 2020 the City Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit for a ±3,470 square foot (SF) building, to allow the use of a financial institution (bank) with a drive-through. The Community Development Department received an application from Kimley- Horn to construct a ±3,357 SF Chase Bank with a drive-through. The applicant has since reduced the square footage by ±113 SF. Public Notices: Public Hearing Notices were mailed to all owners of real property adjacent to and within approximately five-hundred feet (500) of the subject property and all Homeowner’s Associations on file with the City Winter Springs (120 notices). A Community Workshop was held on June 16, 2021 and a Community Workshop flyer was mailed on May 25, 2021 (120 flyers). The flyer was mailed to all owners of real property adjacent to and within approximately five-hundred feet (500) of the subject property and all Homeowner’s Associations on file with the City Winter Springs. There were approximately 10 persons in attendance and several questions asked related to the project, but there were no objections raised at the Community Workshop regarding the proposed development. Final Engineering Plans Criteria, Sec. 20-33.1: (a) Site and final engineering plans and the subdivision of land shall also be subject to the technical requirements set forth in Chapter 9 of the City Code. It is the intent of this section to apply to applications for site and final engineering plans and to any subdivision of land requiring a plat, if applicable, and does not include review and approval of a lot split application. Please see discussion below regarding technical requirements of Chapter 9. The Final Engineering Plans have been reviewed by the City’s engineer, concluding that the Plans satisfy the technical requirements provided the conditions of approval set forth below are met. (b) Except in situations involving one (1) single-family home, the planning and zoning board shall be required to review all site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land applications and make a written recommendation to the city commission. Such recommendation shall include the reasons for the board's 147 PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM | MONDAY, SEPTEMBE 13, 2021 | PAGE 3 OF 17 recommendation and show the board has considered the applicable criteria set forth in this section. (c) Upon receipt of the planning and zoning board's recommendation, the city commission shall make a final decision on the application. If the city commission determines that the planning and zoning board has not made a recommendation on an application within a reasonable period of time, the city commission may, at its discretion, consider an application without the planning and zoning board's recommendation. (d) Except in situations involving one (1) single-family home, all site and final engineering plan and subdivision recommendations and final decisions shall be based on whether the site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land complies with all the technical requirements set forth in chapter 9 of the City Code and the following criteria to the extent applicable: (1) Whether the applicant has demonstrated the site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land, including its proposed density, height, scale and intensity, hours of operation, building and lighting design, setbacks, buffers, noise, refuse, odor, particulates, smoke, fumes and other emissions, parking and traffic-generating characteristics, number of persons anticipated using, residing or working under the plan, and other off-site impacts, is compatible and harmonious with adjacent land uses, and will not adversely impact land use activities in the immediate vicinity. Analysis: The applicant has demonstrated the proposed use does not affect density, as the proposed use is a commercial building. The proposed building will include a faux second two-story, meet setback requirements, and include buffers and is consistent with adjacent uses. The proposed use will not cause added noise, refuse, odor, particulates, smoke, fumes and other emissions, as the proposed use is a bank. The applicant has demonstrated that the parking and traffic-generating characteristics of the proposed use will not adversely impact the site and surrounding area. Seminole County Public Works Department/Engineering Division reviewed the Traffic Impact Analysis and stated that the development does not appear to impact County roadways. The proposed development will be designed to implement the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan as they relate to the Town Center District, and to continue a harmonious land use pattern with existing development. The development is consistent with existing development and recently approved developments within the Town Center District. The proposed height, scale, and intensity of the proposed development is consistent with the adjacent Wendy’s and similar surrounding uses previously approved within the Winter Springs Town Center. The proposed project does not affect density, as the proposed use is a commercial building. In addition, the proposed daily hours of operation are consistent with surrounding uses. The project proposes a ±3,357 SF Chase Bank. The proposed hours 148 PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM | MONDAY, SEPTEMBE 13, 2021 | PAGE 4 OF 17 of operation are as follows: Monday – Friday 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; Saturday 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. an ATM, will be available 24 hours a day. (2) Whether the applicant has demonstrated the size and shape of the site, the proposed access and internal circulation, and the design enhancements to be adequate to accommodate the proposed density, scale and intensity of the site and final engineering plan requested. The site shall be of sufficient size to accommodate design amenities such as screening, buffers, landscaping, open space, off-street parking, safe and convenient automobile, bicycle, and pedestrian mobility at the site, and other similar site plan improvements needed to mitigate against potential adverse impacts of the proposed use. Analysis: The size and shape of the site, the proposed access and internal circulation, and the design enhancements are adequate to accommodate the proposed development. The development provides full ingress and egress to the site from SR 434. Access to the site will be provided via one (1) full access driveway off SR 434 and two (2) full access internal driveways along Sea Hawk Cove. On-site improvements which include landscape screening for dumpster areas, bicycle parking, lighting, and internal pedestrian walkways utilizing alternative pavement. As discussed further below, there is adequate off-street parking for the proposed bank. The applicant is requesting one waiver from Winter Springs City Code Sec. 20-605(b) and (d), which requires a total 27 feet of streetscape area consisting of three component parts: (1) 5-foot landscape area; (ii) 6-foot sidewalk; and (iii) 16-foot landscape and treescape area for planting canopy trees which will line the right-of- way. The waiver is to instead allow (i) 8-foot landscape and treescape area; (ii) a 6-foot sidewalk; and (iii) an 8-foot 3 inches landscape and treescape area adjacent to the right-of-way for a total of a 22-foot 3 inches area in lieu of 27-foot. Further analysis of each waiver request is listed below in the Waiver Section. (3) Whether the proposed site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land will have an adverse impact on the local economy, including governmental fiscal impact, employment, and property values. Analysis: The proposed commercial development was permitted a conditional use to allow a bank within the Town Center and the SR 434 Corridor Overlay District. The development is not expected to have an adverse impact on the local economy, but to add to the local economy by means of generating tax revenue. Development of the subject property as a bank is anticipated to provide an increase to the City’s taxable value, as well as provide a catalyst for future commercial development in the surrounding area. (4) Whether the proposed site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land will have an adverse impact on the natural environment, including air, water, and noise pollution, vegetation and wildlife, open space, noxious and desirable vegetation, and flood hazards. 149 PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM | MONDAY, SEPTEMBE 13, 2021 | PAGE 5 OF 17 Analysis: The subject site is currently vacant and is currently graded and ready to be developed. As a result, the proposed development will not have an adverse impact on the natural environment, including air, water, and noise pollution, vegetation and wildlife, open space, noxious and desirable vegetation, and flood hazards. The total gross area for the site is 0.70 acres and the proposed impervious area is 0.48 acres (68.5%). The maximum impervious allowable to connect into the master stormwater system is 80%, therefore the site is providing less than the allowable impervious cover. A noise study is not required. The City currently has a noise ordinance that restricts decibels ratings from 60-70 in commercial zones from 10:00 p.m. – 7:00 a.m. per Sec. 13-35. maximum permissible sound levels. Noise levels are not anticipated to exceed the allowable noise decibels for this retail use. Based on Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) No. 12117CO160F Community No. 120295, City of Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida, the proposed development site lies within a Zone X (Other Areas). Zone X is for “areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain. (5) Whether the proposed site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land will have an adverse impact on historic, scenic, and cultural resources, including views and vistas, and loss or degradation of cultural and historic resources. Analysis: It is not anticipated that the proposed development will have an adverse impact on any historic, scenic, or cultural resources, including views and vistas, and loss or degradation of cultural and historic resources. (6) Whether the proposed site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land will have an adverse impact on public services, including water, sewer, stormwater and surface water management, police, fire, parks and recreation, streets, public transportation, marina and waterways, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Analysis: The proposed development will be designed in accordance with the Town Center District Code, which will include the following public services; water, sewer, stormwater and surface water management, police, fire (Seminole County Fire Department). Water and sewer are available on-site and there is sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed development and stormwater served by a master stormwater pond. Further analysis below. The proposed development is consistent with established retail/commercial developments and will not have an adverse impact on existing public services. A bicycle rack, including six (6) bicycle spaces will be placed on site, as well as sidewalks for adequate pedestrian circulation. (7) Whether the site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land, and related traffic report and plan provided by the applicant, details safe and efficient means of ingress and egress into and out of the neighborhood and adequately addresses the impact of projected traffic on the immediate neighborhood, traffic circulation pattern for the neighborhood, and traffic flow through immediate intersections and arterials. 150 PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM | MONDAY, SEPTEMBE 13, 2021 | PAGE 6 OF 17 Analysis: See approved Traffic Impact Analysis for discussion regarding impact on regarding traffic circulation. (8) Whether the proposed site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land will have an adverse impact on housing and social conditions, including variety of housing unit types and prices, and neighborhood quality. Analysis: The proposed development is not anticipated to have an adverse impact on housing and social conditions, as the proposed use is retail. (9) Whether the proposed site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land avoids significant adverse odor, emission, noise, glare, and vibration impacts on adjacent and surrounding lands regarding refuse collection, service delivery, parking and loading, signs, lighting, and other sire elements. Analysis: It anticipated that the proposed development will not emit odors, noise, glares, or vibrations that will adversely impact adjacent properties. There is adequate parking, limited hours of operation, lighting, and refuse collection, and minimal deliveries within the proposed development that are in place which will assist in limiting any perceived adverse effects. (10) Whether the applicant has provided an acceptable security plan for the proposed establishment to be located on the site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land that addresses the safety and security needs of the establishment and its users and employees and minimizes impacts on the neighborhood, if applicable. Analysis: A security plan was provided showing that security systems will be installed. The lighting plan provided illustrates that the parking lot and building area will be lit after dark. (11) Whether the applicant has provided on the site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land an acceptable plan for the mass delivery of merchandise for new large footprint buildings (greater than twenty thousand (20,000) square feet) including the hours of operation for delivery trucks to come into and exit the property and surrounding neighborhood, if applicable. Analysis: Not applicable for the proposed use. Proposed building is less than 20,000 SF. (12) Whether the applicant has demonstrated that the site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land have been designed to incorporate mitigative techniques and plans needed to prevent adverse impacts addressed in the criteria stated herein or to adjacent and surrounding uses and properties. Analysis: The applicant has provided a Traffic Impact Analysis that states a sufficient Level of Service is maintained. The proposed site will utilize the previously stubbed out 151 PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM | MONDAY, SEPTEMBE 13, 2021 | PAGE 7 OF 17 internal access road for this site’s use as contemplated within the overall master design of the surrounding uses. The proposed site circulation will use internal access roads, therefore it will not heavily impact local traffic patterns. The Final Engineering Plans, in conjunction with the Development Agreement, prevent adverse impacts to adjacent and surrounding uses and properties. The proposed development will provide adequate screening and buffering. Sufficient parking has been proposed for this use based on typical jurisdictional requirements. (13) Whether the applicant has agreed to execute a binding development agreement required by city to incorporate the terms and conditions of approval deemed necessary by the city commission including, but not limited to, any mitigative techniques and plans required by City Code. Analysis: The applicant has agreed to execute a binding Development Agreement and it is attached hereto as an Exhibit. Water and Sewer: Water service is available from the City’s 12-inch water main northeast along the Michael Blake Boulevard right-of-way (ROW) via the 10-inch water main in the utility easement southwest along Sea Hawk Cove extending to the northwest edge and shall include a fire hydrant near end of pipeline. All utilities located outside public ROWs and easements within the Chase Bank boundary shall be privately owned and maintained. The Developer will be dedicating the water pipelines and meter within the easement to the City as part of the project close out process. The development is connecting to the City’s wastewater collection system via the 8-inch sanitary sewer line from the utility easement southwest along Sea Hawk Cove to the 12-inch force main northwest along the Michael Blake Boulevard ROW. The sanitary sewer collection system internal to the development will be owned and maintained by the Developer and/or Chase Bank. The development will be provided reclaimed (reuse) water for irrigation purposes from a connection to the City’s 4-inch reclaim system within the East SR 434 ROW. During the Chase Bank CUP application, approved by the City Commission on November 16, 2020, the City previously approved an allocation of 1,681 gallons a day. During the City potable water allocation determination, done by the City at the beginning of 2021, the Chase Bank allocation was included and the City will honor that commitment. The City requires that Chase Bank connect its irrigation to the 4” reuse line in the median of SR 434. Stormwater: This project development site is located on Lot 1 within Winter Springs Town Center District. The Winter Springs Town Center Phase II Stormwater Report prepared by Lochrane Engineering, Inc. shows that the stormwater quality and quantity for the proposed Chase Bank project is provided by the master drainage system. The master stormwater management system for this site was permitted under SJRWMD Permit No. 95027-2, which allowed the construction of a ±38‐acre mixed-use development and was designed to provide treatment and attenuation for ±30 acres of impervious area for the entire development. This project consists of the construction of a ±3,357 152 PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM | MONDAY, SEPTEMBE 13, 2021 | PAGE 8 OF 17 SF commercial building and associated sidewalks, parking lot and utility infrastructure. The stormwater runoff will be conveyed to the master stormwater system which accounts for a maximum allowable impervious area of 80%. Lot 1 is a total of 0.71 acres and proposes 0.48 acres of impervious area and 0.23 acres of pervious area. Therefore the proposed impervious area of 0.48 acres is 0.09 acres less than the maximum allowable of 0.57 acres. The proposed development will be designed in accordance with the Town Center District Code, which will include the following public financial institution services (i.e. banking, savings, loan, etc.); water, sewer, stormwater management and surface water drainage systems, police, fire and rescue (Seminole County Fire Department). The proposed development is consistent with established retail developments and will not have an adverse impact on existing public services. Transportation: The proposed development will change the existing drive lane configurations for the adjacent properties and connect proposed traffic circulation to existing drive lanes. An evaluation of traffic has indicated that there will be a minimal to no impact and the conceptual plan details safe and efficient means of ingress and egress for the proposed development. The applicant’s proposal includes a Traffic Impact Analysis that indicates the operation at a satisfactory Level of Service. The anticipated trip generation for the financial institution (bank) use proposes 347 new net daily trips, of which 33 will occur in the A.M. peak hour and 71 will occur in the P.M. peak hour. The trip generation calculation for Chase Bank was previously addressed in Traffic Impact Analysis with the overall platting of Ocean Bleu retail shops, Starbucks, and Wendy’s Fast Food. The proposed development is projected to generate 2,422 new net daily trips, of which 279 will occur in the A.M. peak hour and 186 will occur in the P.M. peak hour. Parking Analysis: Per Section 20-324 of the City’s Land Development Code (LDC), there are no minimum parking requirements in the Town Center. The City required the applicant to provide a traffic study and a parking study which was prepared by the applicant based from the 10th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Parking Generation Manual. For comparison purposes, Section 9-277 of the City’s LDC defines off-street parking requirements for specific land uses. The following minimum parking ratios for the proposed land use is defined in the Code: • General Business: One (1) parking space for each three hundred (300) SF of floor space in the building exclusive of storage space. A total parking supply includes nineteen (19) parking spaces and three (3) handicapped parking spaces at a parking ratio of 3.47 spaces per one-thousand SF to serve the proposed bank’s parking demand. Adequate parking is proposed for this use based on typical jurisdictional requirements, the development provides a total of twenty-two (22) parking spaces. 153 PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM | MONDAY, SEPTEMBE 13, 2021 | PAGE 9 OF 17 The applicant has provided preliminary designs to show traffic impact and site circulation. The applicant has provided a Traffic Impact Analysis that states a sufficient Level of Service is maintained. The proposed site will utilize the previously stubbed out internal access road for this site’s use as contemplated within the overall master design of the surrounding uses. The proposed site circulation will use internal access roads, therefore it will not heavily impact local traffic patterns. Aesthetic Review: Pursuant to Section 9-603, which sets forth guidelines and minimum standards for Aesthetic Review packages, staff has utilized the below criteria in Section 9-603 to determine the following. The attached Aesthetic Review package includes all of the submittal requirements for aesthetic review as set forth in Section 9-600 through 9- 607 and include the following: (a) a site plan; (b) elevations illustration all sides of structures facing public streets or spaces; (c) illustrations of all walls, fences, and other accessory structures and the indication of height and their associated materials; (d) elevation of proposed exterior permanent signs or other constructed elements other than habitable space, if any; (e) illustrations of materials, texture, and colors to be used on all buildings, accessory structures, exterior signs; and (f) other architectural and engineering data as may be required. The procedures for review and approval are set forth in Section 9-603. Aesthetic Review 1. The plans and specifications of the proposed project indicate that the setting, landscaping, proportions, materials, colors, texture, scale, unity, balance, rhythm, contrast, and simplicity are coordinated in a harmonious manner relevant to the particular proposal, surrounding area and cultural character of the community. Analysis: The proposed building contributes to the existing architectural ecosystem of development by conforming to the systemic properties existing and planned. Design features including metal awnings extend the rhythm of the project development. The exterior color palette is in harmony with the Starbucks and the Wendy’s on the norths side of SR 434 which will safeguard the surrounding area and the cultural ecosystem of the community. Overall, the architectural intent of the development Chase Bank includes architecture that is complementary to the styles of architecture in the Town Center. The site was developed to encourage pedestrian use and the proposed development will provide an interconnected system of sidewalks with the larger system of pedestrian itinerary in mind. 2. The plans for the proposed project are in harmony with any future development which has been formally approved by the city within the surrounding area. 154 PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM | MONDAY, SEPTEMBE 13, 2021 | PAGE 10 OF 17 Analysis: The plans are harmonious with the color scheme, materials, and character of the Winter Springs Marketplace, which will be developed south of SR 434. 3. The plans for the proposed project are not excessively similar or dissimilar to any other building, structure or sign which is either fully constructed, permitted but not fully constructed, or included on the same permit application, and facing upon the same or intersecting street within five hundred (500) feet of the proposed site, with respect to one or more of the following features of exterior design and appearance: a. Front or side elevations; b. Size and arrangement of elevation facing the street, including reverse arrangement; or c. Other significant features of design such as, but not limited to: materials, roof line, hardscape improvements, and height or design elements. Analysis: The architectural design intent is to contribute and enhance the architectural aesthetic design within the area. It contributes to the progressive attributes planned and existing within the City of Winter Springs. Architectural elements along with the project’s materials and composition enhances and expands the reach of these design features. The proposed design shares the appropriate scale and design intent of the Town Center (Winter Springs Marketplace, Wendy’s, and Starbucks). 4. The plans for the proposed project are in harmony with, or significantly enhance, the established character of other buildings, structures or signs in the surrounding area with respect to architectural specifications and design features deemed significant based upon commonly accepted architectural principles of the local community. Analysis: The proposed project enhances the character and overall aesthetics of the surrounding area. The City of Winter Springs is comprised of diverse architectural styles and therefore, the all of proposed buildings taken as a group demonstrate deemed significant based upon commonly accepted architectural principles of the local community. 5. The proposed project has incorporated significant architectural enhancements such as concrete masonry units with stucco, wrought iron, columns and piers, porches, arches, planting areas, display windows, and other distinctive design detailing and promoting the character of the community. Analysis: The proposed development is designed to contribute to the quality architectural styles that are typical with recently approved developments within the Town Center. Chase Bank includes a faux second story with second story display windows. The exterior provides series of straight lines which continues the existing rhythm across the façade of the building. 155 PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM | MONDAY, SEPTEMBE 13, 2021 | PAGE 11 OF 17 Significant design features include architectural design elements include; architectural brick, wood-look exterior wall panels, and warm-neutral paint colors similar to the adjacent Wendy’s and Starbucks. Waiver Requirement Section 20-34. – Waivers. • Any real property owner may file a waiver application requesting a waiver for their real property from any term and condition of this chapter (except from the list of permitted, conditional and prohibited uses set forth in any zoning district category). • The Planning and Zoning Board shall be required to review all waiver applications and make a written recommendation to the City Commission. Such recommendation shall include the reasons for the Board’s recommendation and show the board has considered the applicable waiver criteria set forth in this section. • Upon receipt of the Planning and Zoning Board’s recommendation, the City Commission shall make a final decision on the application. If the City Commission determines that the Planning and Zoning Board has not made a recommendation on an application within a reasonable period of time, the City Commission may, at its discretion, consider an application without the Planning and Zoning Board's recommendation. • All waiver recommendations and final decisions shall comply with the following criteria: Waiver criteria set forth in Subsection 20-34(d) are as follows: 1. The applicant clearly demonstrates that the applicable term or condition clearly creates an illogical, impossible, impractical, or patently unreasonable result related to the proposed property and development. 2. The proposed development plan is in substantial compliance with this chapter and in compliance with the comprehensive plan. 3. The proposed development plan will significantly enhance the real property. 4. The proposed development plan serves the public health, safety, and welfare. 5. The waiver will not diminish property values in or alter the essential character of the surrounding neighborhood. 6. The waiver granted is the minimum waiver that will eliminate or reduce the illogical, impossible, impractical, or patently unreasonable result caused by the applicable term or condition under this chapter. 7. The proposed development plan is compatible and harmonious with the surrounding neighborhood. 8. Whether the applicant has agreed to execute a binding development agreement required by city to incorporate the terms and conditions of 156 PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM | MONDAY, SEPTEMBE 13, 2021 | PAGE 12 OF 17 approval deemed necessary by the city commission including, but not limited to, any mitigative techniques and plans required by City Code. The applicant requests that the City Commission consider the one waiver request listed below: Waivers Request/Justification 1. The applicant requests a Waiver from Winter Springs City Code Sec. 20- 605(b) and (d), from Winter Springs City Code Sec. 20-605(b) and (d), which requires a total 27 feet of streetscape area consisting of three component parts: (1) 5-foot landscape area; (ii) 6-foot sidewalk; and (iii) 16-foot landscape and treescape area for planting canopy trees which will line the right-of-way. The waiver is to instead allow (i) 8-foot landscape and treescape area; (ii) a 6- foot sidewalk; and (iii) an 8-foot 3 inches landscape and treescape area adjacent to the right-of-way for a total of a 22-foot 3 inches area in lieu of 27- foot. Justification: The Applicant is requesting a waiver in order to provide a frontage along State Road 434 continuous with the adjacent Lot 2 of the development (Wendy’s). The Wendy’s project provides an 8’ landscape and treescape area, a 6’ sidewalk, and 8’ landscape treescape area. This project proposes 8’ of landscape and treescape area, a 6’ sidewalk; and 8’ landscape and treescape area adjacent to the right-of-way. In addition to providing a continuous frontage, the existing frontage consists of a 5’ sidewalk abutting a 2’ landscape and treescape area along SR 434. This project proposes an increase in sidewalk width from 5’ to 6’ to comply with City Code and align with the recently constructed Wendy’s sidewalk. The proposed sidewalk jogs down to tie into the existing pedestrian curb ramp and crosswalk which provides access across the shared driveway between the proposed site and the existing McDonalds. The project does not propose any modifications to this ramp as to minimize impacts to the surrounding properties and utilities abutting the existing curb ramp. City Code: City Code Sec. 20-605(b) and (d) Transect Standards | Table T5 (Urban Center Zone). Staff supports the requested waiver and supplied justification. The waiver request will provide continuous streetscape along the frontage road and interior landscaping between adjacent lots. Similar requests have been approved in the Town Center (Wendy’s and Winter Springs Marketplace). 157 PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM | MONDAY, SEPTEMBE 13, 2021 | PAGE 13 OF 17 Waiver Analysis: In evaluation of the one (1) proposed waiver request, the applicant has satisfied the eight (8) specific criteria and supports the one (1) waiver request as listed above. The site is part of an overall master development that has previously been approved by the City which is in substantial compliance with Chapter 20 of the City’s Code of Ordinance, Comprehensive Plan, and Land Development Code. The proposed waiver requests are to provide streetscape consistent with the previously approved master site and adjacent Wendy’s development. The site is part of an overall master development that was previously permitted thorough the City. The proposed use is consistent with the approved master development, therefore it is compatible and harmonious with its surroundings. Reports: The Final Engineering submittal is required to include the following reports or updates of previously prepared reports for the same property. Reports July 1994 Easement Agreement July 12, 2018 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment | PM Environmental, Inc. October 30, 2018 Geo Technical Report | Terracon March 2019 Transportation Impact Analysis | Traffic Planning and Design, Inc. May 2019 Declaration of Covenants, Restrictions and Reciprocal Easement Agreement | REA Recorded June 2019 Purchase and Sale Agreement July 2020 Development Agreement | JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. Conditional Use January 27, 2021 Stormwater Narrative | Kimley Horn June 17, 2021 Potable Water Demand | Kimley Horn June 24, 2021 Review Criteria Response | Kimley Horn July 2021 Development Agreement | JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. Final Engineering, Aesthetic Review and Waiver 158 PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM | MONDAY, SEPTEMBE 13, 2021 | PAGE 14 OF 17 Procedural History: October 10, 2019 Conditional Use Application Submittal | CU2020-0008 February 20, 2020 Community Workshop | 110 Notices March 13, 2020 Aesthetic Review | AE2020-0007 October 7, 2020 Planning & Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency | Cancelled November 4, 2020 Planning & Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency | Recommendation of Approval for Conditional Use November 16, 2020 City Commission | Approval for Conditional Use January 28, 2021 Final Engineering Application | SP2021-0005 March 29, 2021 Waiver Application | WA2021-0022 June 16, 2021 Community Workshop | 120 Notices July 1, 2021 Planning & Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency | Cancelled August 5, 2021 Planning & Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency | Recommendation of Approval September 13, 2021 City Commission | Pending Applicable Law, Public Policy, and Events: Florida Statutes 163.2511-163.3246: Growth Policy; County and Municipal Planning; Land Development Regulation (Provides that land development regulations for municipal planning be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan). Home Rule Powers City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan City of Winter Springs Code of Ordinances Ch20, Sec. 20-1. Definitions. Ch20, Sec. 20-33. Conditional Uses. Section 20-34 Waivers Ch20, Sec. 20-601. – Streetscape Requirements. Division 5. Sounds Levels by Receiving Land Use Division 12. - Town Center District Code Sec. 20-325. - Transect standards. City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan. Future Land Use Element, Policy 1.1.6 159 PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM | MONDAY, SEPTEMBE 13, 2021 | PAGE 15 OF 17 Fiscal Impact: Development of the subject property as a bank is anticipated to provide an increase to the City’s taxable value, as well as provide a catalyst for future commercial development in the surrounding area. Impact Fees/Unit > Based on total SF (square footage), GFA (gross floor area) unless noted otherwise – Non-Residential. Chase Bank ~±3,357 SF (Bank w/ Drive-up ATM) Commercial Transportation/Road: $ 4,565.00/3.357 SF = $ 15,324.71 Fire: $ 72.00/3.357 net SF = $ 241.70 Police: $ 0.156 per SF = $ 523.69 Parks & Recreation: N/A City Impact Fees (Chase Bank) Total = $ 16,090.10 NOTE – This is only an estimate (subject to change) and official impact fee calculations will be determined based on Final Engineering plans submitted and approved for permitting application and reviews. Development Agreement: Pursuant to Section 20-29 of the City Code, all development projects requiring a community workshop pursuant to Section 20-29.1 shall be required to be memorialized in a binding Development Agreement executed by the City and the property owner. Community workshops are required for all new commercial development, under Section 20-29.1. A Community Workshop was held on Wednesday, June 16, 2021. The draft Development Agreement is enclosed as an Exhibit hereto. In addition, as part of the conditional use approval for a bank/financial institution, the Developer previously entered into a “Conditional Use” Development Agreement, which included the following specific conditions of approval. These conditions of approval continue to remain in full force and effect: 1. The Developer’s Conceptual Sketch, as shown in Exhibit 3 – Conceptual Plans, includes a common driveway access with the adjacent parcel, which will be constructed to straddle the Property’s eastern property line. The adjacent parcel is intended to be a future Wendy’s fast food restaurant, which itself is the subject of a certain Development Agreement recorded in the Official Records of Seminole County at Book 9538, Pages 745-755 (“Adjacent Parcel”). Therefore, the Developer has provided an executed Declaration of Covenants, Restricts and Reciprocal Easements Agreement, recorded in the Official Records of Seminole County at Book 9354, Pages 127-163, on May 14, 2019 (“Declaration”), which includes an easement for reciprocal ingress and egress between the Property and the Adjacent Parcel (“Access Easement”). Should the parties ever mutually desire to terminate the Access Easement set forth in the Declaration, prior to executing such termination, the parties shall be required to seek and receive consent from the City of Winter Springs and obtain an amendment to the future site plan and final engineering plans. 160 PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM | MONDAY, SEPTEMBE 13, 2021 | PAGE 16 OF 17 2. There shall be no retail sales of alcohol and no retail sales, manufacturing, or compounding of any products derived from the hemp plant or cannabis plant, including CBD (cannabidiol). The Development Agreement for the current final engineering, aesthetics and waivers applications has been drafted to address several important issues regarding the proposed Final Engineering Plans. Specific conditions of approval in this Development Agreement are as follows: A. The Developer shall include and install decorative street and traffic signs and light poles pursuant to Sec. 20-325(d) of the Town Center District Code acceptable to the City’s Community Development Director. B. The trees proposed to be planted in the public right-of-way by the Developer shall be subject to the obligation of ongoing maintenance and replacement for the first two years following planting, at the Developer’s expense. If the City determines, after reasonable inspection, that any tree has become severely diseased or damaged to the point that the viability of the tree has been significantly compromised, the Developer shall be required to replace the tree. In the event that Developer fails to perform the necessary maintenance, repairs or replacements of any of the trees, the City shall have the right, but not obligation, to conduct said maintenance, repairs or replacements and recover the actual cost thereof from the Developer. Prior to exercising that right, the City shall provide the Developer written notice and an explanation of the specific default and at least thirty (30) days in which to cure the default. If Developer fails to cure the default by the end of the cure period, the City may exercise its rights to maintain and replace at any time thereafter. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Commission approve with conditions the Aesthetic Plan Review, one Waiver, Final Engineering Plans, Development Agreement, and adopt the findings of the Staff Report in order to construct a ±3,357 square foot (SF) financial institution (Chase Bank) with a drive-through within the Town Center District. 1. Project approval is conditioned upon the execution of the Development Agreement and the terms and conditions contained therein. 2. The Developer shall include and install decorative street and traffic signs and light poles pursuant to Sec. 20-325(d) of the Town Center District Code acceptable to the City’s Community Development Director. 3. The trees proposed to be planted in the public right-of-way by the Developer shall be subject to the obligation of ongoing maintenance and replacement for the first two years following planting, at the Developer’s expense. If the City determines, after reasonable inspection, that any tree has become severely diseased or damaged to the point that the viability of the tree has been significantly compromised, the Developer shall be required to replace the tree. In the event that Developer fails to perform the necessary maintenance, repairs or replacements of any of the trees, the City shall have the right, but not obligation, 161 PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM | MONDAY, SEPTEMBE 13, 2021 | PAGE 17 OF 17 to conduct said maintenance, repairs or replacements and recover the actual cost thereof from the Developer. Prior to exercising that right, the City shall provide the Developer written notice and an explanation of the specific default and at least thirty (30) days in which to cure the default. If Developer fails to cure the default by the end of the cure period, the City may exercise its rights to maintain and replace at any time thereafter. Attachments: Vicinity and Aerial Map Final Engineering Plans / Site Plan Approval/ Application Aesthetic Plan Review Application Waiver Application Development Agreement Reports 162 Project Site Parcel ID# 06-21-31-507-0000-0010 SUBJECT PROPERTY 163 164 165 166 Know what's below. before you dig.Call R BANK7/7/2021 149568016NEBKMAS NOTEDDD1CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS3/24/2021NEBSR 434 & TUSKAWILLAWINTER SPRINGS , FLORIDA 32708©2CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS5/10/2021NEB3BUILDING REVISION AND RECLAIM PIPE ADDITION6/25/2021NEB4SIDEWALK AND LANDSCAPE REVISIONS7/07/2021NEBKIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. DAWN DODGE, P.E. 100 2ND AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE 105N ST.PETERSBURG, FL 33701 PHONE: (727) 547-3999 LIST OF CONTACTS PROJECT DESIGN TEAM LEADING EDGE LAND SERVICES, INC. JEFFREY D. HOFIUS, P.S.M. 8802 EXCHANGE DRIVE ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32809 PHONE: (407) 351-6730 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS PUBLIC WORKS 1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708 (407) 327-1800 JP MORGAN CHASE BANK 97 DENMEADE WALK MARIETTA, GA 33064 SURVEYCIVIL WATER ELECTRIC DEVELOPER AERIAL MAP 1" = 2000' SITE SOILS N.T.S. OWNER LEGAL DESCRIPTION TOPOGRAPHIC MAP N.T.S. DUKE ENERGY 2801 WEST SR 426 OVIEDO, FL 32765 (407) 359-4447 SR 4 3 4 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC JENNIFER DAOULAS, P.L.A. 100 2ND AVE SOUTH, SUITE 105N ST. PETERSBURG, FL 33701 PHONE: (727) 547-3999 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SITE STORMWATER SEWER TUSKAWILLA ROADCONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: DP2019-0020 CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA SITE SR 434 AND TUSKAWILLA RD WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708 C-000COVER SHEETSheet List Table Sheet Number Sheet Title C-000 COVER SHEET C-001 SURVEY C-100 DEMOLITION PLAN C-200 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C-201 SWPPP DETAILS C-300 SITE PLAN C-301 SITE PLAN DETAILS C-302 FDOT SITE DETAILS C-303 FIRE TRUCK TURN C-500 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C-501 GRADING DETAILS C-600 UTILITY PLAN C-700 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN C-800 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS UTILITY DETAILS L-100 LANDSCAPE PLAN L-101 LANDSCAPE NOTES L-102 LANDSCAPE DETAILS I-100 IRRIGATION PLAN I-101 IRRIGATION NOTES WINTER SPRINGS TOWN CENTER LOT 1 1 2 JDBS WINTER SPRINGS 10931 N DALE MABRY HWY TAMPA, FL 33618-4112 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS PUBLIC WORKS 1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708 (407) 327-1800 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS PUBLIC WORKS 1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708 (407) 327-1800 CABLE SPECTRUM CABLE 3767 ALLAMERICAN BLVD. ORLANDO, FL 32810 1-800-222-0102 TELEPHONE AT&T ORLANDO, FL 32801 (407) 327-1800 PARCEL #: 06-21-31-507-0000-0010 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPLIANCE STATEMENT 1 CONTRACTOR NOTICE 1 167 U D D LANDS OF McDONALD'S RESTAURANTS OF FLORIDA, INC. O.R. 2803, PG. 632 LANDS OF WINTER SPRINGS APARTMENTS LP S T A T E R O A D 4 3 4TUSKAWILLA ROADN29°03'10"E 188.49'S E A H A W K C O V E S 3 9 ° 3 2 ' 1 9 " E 2 0 8 . 6 5 'S50°29'56"W 174.97'N 3 9 ° 4 4 ' 5 7 "W 1 3 9 . 7 3 ' LANDS OF JDBS WINTER SPRINGS, LLC D LEGEND U D EADING EDGELAND SERVICESFORKIMLEY-HORNTOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF LOT 1 - WSTC OCEAN BLEU TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY0 20 40 60 SURVEYOR'S NOTES VICINITY MAP ” “ ”SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION168 LANDS OFMcDONALD'S RESTAURANTSOF FLORIDA, INC.O.R. 2803, PG. 632LANDS OFWINTER SPRINGSAPARTMENTS LPN29°03'10"E 188.49'S39°32'19"E 208.65'S50°29'56"W 174.97'N39°44'57"W 139.73'LANDS OFJDBS WINTERSPRINGS, LLCNO PARKING FIRE LANE EB EB EB PULL BOXohohohohohohohPICK UP WINDOW PICK UPWINDOWWWW W Wwm wm wm wm wm wm wm 2" PVC PIPE IN GROUND (UNKNOWN UTILITY) TOP=37.72 NE INV=26.72 SE INV=26.92 W. INV=27.05 SANSANSANSANSANSAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN S A N EAGLE EDGE LANE(62' R/W PER ORB 9329, PG 443)STATE ROAD 434 (SANFORD - OVIEDO ROAD) (R/W WIDTH VARIES) SEA HAWK COVE (62' R/W) TRACT "D" PER PB 82, PG 63-66 wm wm wm wm wmSANSANSANSAN SAN SAN SAN ONLYA B B B C D D F E G ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: 1.THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE. WHEN PERFORMING GRADING OPERATIONS DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING, DRAINAGE AND GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS. 2.ALL WM GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. OUTLOT AREA TO BE KEPT FREE OF JOB TRAILERS AND STORAGE AFTER THE CONTRACT MILESTONE DATE FOR THE OUTLOT. WM GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE CLEAR ACCESS FOR OUTLOT CONTRACTOR TO THE SPECIFIC PARCEL AT ALL TIMES AFTER MILESTONE DATE. PURCHASER OF OUTLOT TO PROVIDE PERMIT DOCUMENTS AND SWPPP REQUIRED BY STATE/LOCAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIFIC OUTLOT. Know what's below. before you dig.Call R BANK7/7/2021 149568016NEBKMAS NOTEDDD1CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS3/24/2021NEBSR 434 & TUSKAWILLAWINTER SPRINGS , FLORIDA 32708©2CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS5/10/2021NEB3BUILDING REVISION AND RECLAIM PIPE ADDITION6/25/2021NEB4SIDEWALK AND LANDSCAPE REVISIONS7/07/2021NEBCLEARING AND GRUBBING (AS REQUIRED) CONCRETE REMOVAL REMOVE ASPHALT AND BASE MATERIAL EXISTING STORM STRUCTURE TO REMAIN EXISTING GATE VALVE AND BLOW-OFF ASSEMBLY TO REMAIN EXISTING SEWER CLEANOUT TO REMAIN EXISTING SCHOOL SIGN TO BE RELOCATED A B C D E F G DEMOLITION NOTES 1.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEMOLITION, REMOVAL, AND DISPOSAL (IN A LOCATION APPROVED BY ALL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES) ALL STRUCTURES, PADS, WALLS, FLUMES, FOUNDATIONS, PARKING, DRIVES, DRAINAGE, STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, ETC., SUCH THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE REMAINING PLANS CAN BE CONSTRUCTED. ALL FACILITIES TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE UNDERCUT TO SUITABLE MATERIAL AND BROUGHT TO GRADE WITH SUITABLE COMPACTED FILL MATERIAL PER THE SPECIFICATIONS. 2.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING ALL DEBRIS FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSING THE DEBRIS IN A LAWFUL MANNER. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR DEMOLITION AND DISPOSAL. 3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL AND/OR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY CONCERNING PORTIONS OF WORK WHICH MAY BE PERFORMED BY THE UTILITY COMPANY'S FORCES AND ANY FEES WHICH ARE TO BE PAID TO THE UTILITY COMPANY FOR THEIR SERVICES. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING ALL FEES AND CHARGES. 4.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING EXISTING IRRIGATION SYSTEM IN THE AREAS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CAP THE EXISTING IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO REMAIN SUCH THAT THE REMAINING SYSTEM SHALL CONTINUE TO FUNCTION PROPERLY. 5.THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAVE BEEN DETERMINED FROM THE BEST INFORMATION AVAILABLE AND ARE GIVEN FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR. THE ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR ACCURACY. PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY DEMOLITION ACTIVITY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE UTILITY COMPANIES FOR ONSITE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES. FLORIDA LAW (F.S. 556) UNDERGROUND FACILITY DAMAGE PREVENTION AND SAFETY ACT MANDATES THAT EXCAVATORS/CONTRACTORS SHALL CONTACT SUNSHINE 811 (FKA: SUNSHINE STATE ONE-CALL OF FLORIDA) BY CALLING 800-432-4770 OR 811 AT LEAST 2 FULL BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY EXCAVATION OR DEMOLITION TO ALLOW MEMBER OPERATORS AN OPPORTUNITY TO IDENTIFY AND MARK THEIR UNDERGROUND FACILITIES AND APPROPRIATELY RESPONSE TO THE POSITIVE RESPONSE SYSTEM. 6.ALL EXISTING SEWERS, PIPING AND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE NOT TO BE INTERPRETED AS THE EXACT LOCATION, OR AS THE ONLY OBSTACLES THAT MAY OCCUR ON THE SITE. VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROCEED WITH CAUTION AROUND ANY ANTICIPATED FEATURES. GIVE NOTICE TO ALL UTILITY COMPANIES REGARDING DESTRUCTION AND REMOVAL OF ALL SERVICE LINES AND CAP ALL LINES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. UTILITIES DETERMINED TO BE ABANDONED AND LEFT IN PLACE SHALL BE GROUTED IF UNDER BUILDING. 7.ELECTRICAL, TELEPHONE, CABLE, WATER, FIBER OPTIC CABLE AND/OR GAS LINES NEEDING TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANY. ADEQUATE TIME SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR RELOCATION AND CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY IS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A SMOOTH TRANSITION IN UTILITY SERVICE. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN THE ANY ROAD RIGHT OF WAY DURING CONSTRUCTION. 8.CONTRACTOR MUST PROTECT THE PUBLIC AT ALL TIMES WITH FENCING, BARRICADES, ENCLOSURES, ETC., (AND OTHER APPROPRIATE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES) AS APPROVED BY CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. 9.CONTINUOUS ACCESS SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AT ALL TIMES DURING DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING FACILITIES. 10.PRIOR TO DEMOLITION OCCURRING, ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED. 11.DAMAGE TO ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS TO REMAIN WILL BE REPLACED AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 12.ALL ITEMS BASED ON PROVIDED SURVEY. IF ADDITIONAL ITEMS ARE FOUND, COORDINATE WITH THE ENGINEER. C-100DEMOLITION PLANEXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING ELECTRIC LEGEND NORTHCHASE BOUNDARY NOTE: EXISTING SITE LAYOUT, UTILITY INVERTS, AND GRADE ELEVATIONS TAKEN FROM CAD LINEWORK AND PLANS PREPARED BY LEADING EDGE LAND SERVICES DATED 05/21/2020. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING EXISTING INFORMATION SHOWN PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. REMOVE SIGN EXISTING STORM PIPE EXISTING STORM INLET DEMOLITION LEGEND 1 1 1 4 4 4 169 LANDS OFMcDONALD'S RESTAURANTSOF FLORIDA, INC.O.R. 2803, PG. 632LANDS OFWINTER SPRINGSAPARTMENTS LPN29°03'10"E 188.49'S39°32'19"E 208.65'S50°29'56"W 174.97'N39°44'57"W 139.73'LANDS OFJDBS WINTERSPRINGS, LLCCO CO CO COCO CO CO +/- 3,357 S.F. F.F.E 41.20 TNO PARKING FIRE LANE EB EB EB PULL BOXohohohohohohohPICK UP WINDOW PICK UPWINDOWWWW W Wwm wm wm wm wm wm wm SANSANSANSANSANSAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN S A N EAGLE EDGE LANE(62' R/W PER ORB 9329, PG 443)STATE ROAD 434 (SANFORD - OVIEDO ROAD) (R/W WIDTH VARIES) SEA HAWK COVE (62' R/W) TRACT "D" PER PB 82, PG 63-66 wm wm wm wm wmSANSANSANSAN SAN SAN SAN ONLYCE SS SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF S F SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SF SF IP3 SDP 40.038.0 38.5 39.039.540.541.041.541 . 5 41.541.0 40.0 39.5 40.5 41.0 42.5 43. 0 4 3 . 5 38.5 38.0 38.5 39.0 41.0 40.0 38.5 38.5 38.5 39.0 39.5 40.5 41.0 41.5 42.0 IP3 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION GATE SF SF IP3 IP3 ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: 1.THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE. WHEN PERFORMING GRADING OPERATIONS DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING, DRAINAGE AND GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS. 2.ALL WM GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. OUTLOT AREA TO BE KEPT FREE OF JOB TRAILERS AND STORAGE AFTER THE CONTRACT MILESTONE DATE FOR THE OUTLOT. WM GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE CLEAR ACCESS FOR OUTLOT CONTRACTOR TO THE SPECIFIC PARCEL AT ALL TIMES AFTER MILESTONE DATE. PURCHASER OF OUTLOT TO PROVIDE PERMIT DOCUMENTS AND SWPPP REQUIRED BY STATE/LOCAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIFIC OUTLOT. Know what's below. before you dig.Call R BANK7/7/2021 149568016NEBKMAS NOTEDDD1CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS3/24/2021NEBSR 434 & TUSKAWILLAWINTER SPRINGS , FLORIDA 32708©2CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS5/10/2021NEB3BUILDING REVISION AND RECLAIM PIPE ADDITION6/25/2021NEB4SIDEWALK AND LANDSCAPE REVISIONS7/07/2021NEBC-200STORMWATER POLLUTIONPREVENTION PLANNOTE: EXISTING SITE LAYOUT, UTILITY INVERTS, AND GRADE ELEVATIONS TAKEN FROM CAD LINEWORK AND PLANS PREPARED BY LEADING EDGE LAND SERVICES DATED 05/21/2020. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING EXISTING INFORMATION SHOWN PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1.THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ("SWPPP") IS COMPRISED OF THIS EROSION CONTROL PLAN, THE STANDARD DETAILS, PLUS THE PERMIT AND ALL SUBSEQUENT REPORTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS. 2.ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN AND THE STATE OF FLORIDA NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM GENERAL PERMIT (NPDES PERMIT) AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THEIR CONTENTS. 3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AS REQUIRED BY THE SWPPP. ADDITIONAL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AS DICTATED BY CONDITIONS AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER THROUGHOUT ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. 4.BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) AND CONTROLS SHALL CONFORM TO FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL REQUIREMENTS OR MANUAL OF PRACTICE, AS APPLICABLE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT ADDITIONAL CONTROLS AS DIRECTED BY THE WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, PERMITTING AGENCY OR OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR OF RECORD SHALL BE REQUIRED TO PREPARE A SWPPP AND SUBMIT IT TO THE CITY FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR MOBILIZING TO THE SITE AND INSTALLING THE BMPS. THE CONTRACTOR OF RECORD SHALL BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT FOR AND OBTAIN A NOTICE OF INTENT FROM FDEP FOR A CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT. 5.EROSION CONTROL PLAN MUST CLEARLY DELINEATE ALL STATE WATERS. PERMITS FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IMPACTING STATE WATERS OR REGULATED WETLANDS MUST BE MAINTAINED ON SITE AT ALL TIMES. 6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE CLEARING TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICAL OR AS REQUIRED BY THE GENERAL PERMIT. 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL DENOTE ON PLAN THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA WHICH SHALL ALSO BE USED AS THE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND CLEANING AREA, EMPLOYEE PARKING AREA, AND AREA FOR LOCATING PORTABLE FACILITIES, OFFICE TRAILERS, AND TOILET FACILITIES. 8.ALL WASH WATER (CONCRETE TRUCKS, VEHICLE CLEANING, EQUIPMENT CLEANING, ETC.) SHALL BE DETAINED AND PROPERLY TREATED OR DISPOSED. 9.SUFFICIENT OIL AND GREASE ABSORBING MATERIALS AND FLOTATION BOOMS SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON SITE OR READILY AVAILABLE TO CONTAIN AND CLEAN-UP FUEL OR CHEMICAL SPILLS AND LEAKS. 10.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DUST CONTROL ON SITE. THE USE OF MOTOR OILS AND OTHER PETROLEUM BASED OR TOXIC LIQUIDS FOR DUST SUPPRESSION OPERATIONS IS PROHIBITED. 11.RUBBISH, TRASH, GARBAGE, LITTER, OR OTHER SUCH MATERIALS SHALL BE DEPOSITED INTO SEALED CONTAINERS. MATERIALS SHALL BE PREVENTED FROM LEAVING THE PREMISES THROUGH THE ACTION OF WIND OR STORM WATER DISCHARGE INTO DRAINAGE DITCHES OR WATERS OF THE STATE. 12.ALL STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION MEASURES PRESENTED ON THE PLAN, SHALL BE INITIATED AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE. 13.STABILIZATION PRACTICES SHOULD BE INITIATED AS SOON AS PRACTICAL, BUT IN NO CASE MORE THAN 7 DAYS WHERE CONSTRUCTION HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. 14.DISTURBED PORTIONS OF THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS PERMANENTLY STOPPED SHALL BE PERMANENTLY SEEDED/SODDED. THESE AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED.SODDED NO LATER THAN 7 DAYS AFTER THE LAST CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY OCCURRED IN THESE AREAS. REFER TO PART 5.4 OF THE NPDES GENERIC PERMIT FOR SEEDING AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS. 15.IF THE ACTION OF VEHICLES TRAVELING OVER THE GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES IS NOT SUFFICIENT TO REMOVE THE MAJORITY OF DIRT OR MUD, THEN THE TIRES MUST BE WASHED BEFORE THE VEHICLES ENTER A PUBLIC ROAD. IF WASHING IS USED, PROVISIONS MUST BE MADE TO INTERCEPT THE WASH WATER AND TRAP THE SEDIMENT BEFORE IT IS CARRIED OFF THE SITE. 16.ALL MATERIALS SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED FROM VEHICLES ONTO ROADWAYS OR INTO STORM DRAINS MUST BE REMOVED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. 17.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING SEDIMENT IN THE DETENTION/RETENTION POND AND ANY SEDIMENT THAT MAY HAVE COLLECTED IN THE STORM SEWER DRAINAGE SYSTEMS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE STABILIZATION OF THE SITE. 18.ON-SITE & OFF SITE SOIL STOCKPILE AND BORROW AREAS SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION THROUGH IMPLEMENTATION OF BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. STOCKPILE AND BORROW AREA LOCATIONS SHALL BE NOTED ON THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND PERMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERAL PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 19.SLOPES SHALL BE LEFT IN A ROUGHENED CONDITION DURING THE GRADING PHASE TO REDUCE RUNOFF VELOCITIES AND EROSION. 20.DUE TO GRADE CHANGES DURING THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADJUSTING THE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES (SILT FENCES, ETC.) TO PREVENT EROSION. 21.ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE STABILIZED AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY, THIS INCLUDES BACK FILLING OF TRENCHES FOR UTILITY CONSTRUCTION AND PLACEMENT OF GRAVEL OR BITUMINOUS PAVING FOR ROAD CONSTRUCTION. CO PROPOSED CLEANOUT CE SF SF IP3 FILTER SACKS (GRATED INLETS) SDP SOCK DRAIN INLET PROTECTION CONSTRUCTION EXIT (LOCATION MAY CHANGE DURING PROJECT) SEDIMENTATION/SILT FENCE WITH WIRE SUPPORT CHASE BOUNDARY EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING STORM STRUCTURE EXISTING ELECTRIC EXISTING STORM PIPE EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FENCE AND GATE WITH VISUAL SCREENING LEGEND NORTH1 1 1 1 3 170 ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: 1.THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE. WHEN PERFORMING GRADING OPERATIONS DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING, DRAINAGE AND GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS. 2.ALL WM GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. OUTLOT AREA TO BE KEPT FREE OF JOB TRAILERS AND STORAGE AFTER THE CONTRACT MILESTONE DATE FOR THE OUTLOT. WM GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE CLEAR ACCESS FOR OUTLOT CONTRACTOR TO THE SPECIFIC PARCEL AT ALL TIMES AFTER MILESTONE DATE. PURCHASER OF OUTLOT TO PROVIDE PERMIT DOCUMENTS AND SWPPP REQUIRED BY STATE/LOCAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIFIC OUTLOT. Know what's below. before you dig.Call R BANK1/5/2021 149568016NEBKMAS NOTEDDDSR 434 & TUSKAWILLAWINTER SPRINGS , FLORIDA 32708©C-201SWPPP DETAILSN.T.S. N.T.S. SWPPP INFORMATION N.T.S. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT FENCE (SF) 36" MINIMUM LENGTH FENCE POST, DRIVEN A MINIMUM OF 16" INTO GROUND 16" MINIMUM HEIGHT OF GEOTEXTILE CLASS F 8" MINIMUM DEPTH IN GROUND FLOW FLOW PERSPECTIVE VIEW 36" MINIMUM FENCE POST LENGTH FILTER CLOTH FENCE POST SECTION MINIMUM 20" ABOVE GROUND UNDISTURBED GROUND FENCE POST DRIVEN A MINIMUM OF 16" INTO THE GROUND CROSS SECTION EMBED GEOTEXTILE CLASS F A MINIMUM OF 8" VERTICALLY INTO THE GROUND TOP VIEW POSTS SECTION B STAPLE STANDARD SYMBOL SFJOINING TWO ADJACENT SILT FENCE SECTIONS SECTION A STAPLE Construction Specifications 1. Fence posts shall be a minimum of 36" long driven 16" minimum into the ground. Wood posts shall be 11/2" x 11/2" square (minimum) cut, or 13/4" diameter (minimum) round and shall be of sound quality hardwood. Steel posts will be standard T or U section weighting not less than 1.00 pond per linear foot. 2. Geotextile shall be fastened securely to each fence post with wire ties or staples at top and mid-section and shall meet the following requirements for Geotextile Class F: Tensile Strength 50 lbs/in (min.) Tensile Modulus 20 lbs/in (min.) Flow Rate 0.3 gal ft / minute (max.) Filtering Efficiency 75% (min.) 3. Where ends of geotextile fabric come together, they shall be overlapped, folded and stapled to prevent sediment bypass. 4. Silt Fence shall be inspected after each rainfall event and maintained when bulges occur or when sediment accumulation reached 50% of the fabric height. SECTION A-A SECTION B-B ℄ 171 PROPOSED TRANSFORMER PAD AND MANUAL TRANSFER SWITCH +/- 3,357 S.F. F.F.E 41.20 THRUONLYDRIVEUP ATMDO NOT ENTERTNO PARKING FIRE LANE EB EB EB PULL BOXohohohohohohohPICK UP WINDOW PICK UPWINDOWWWW W Wwm wm wm wm wm wm wm 2" PVC PIPE IN GROUND (UNKNOWN UTILITY) TOP=37.72 NE INV=26.72 SE INV=26.92 W. INV=27.05 SANSANSANSANSANSAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN S A N EAGLE EDGE LANE(62' R/W PER ORB 9329, PG 443)STATE ROAD 434 (SANFORD - OVIEDO ROAD) (R/W WIDTH VARIES) SEA HAWK COVE (62' R/W) TRACT "D" PER PB 82, PG 63-66 wm wm wm wm wmSANSANSANSAN SAN SAN SAN ONLYLANDS OFMcDONALD'S RESTAURANTSOF FLORIDA, INC.O.R. 2803, PG. 632LANDS OFWINTER SPRINGSAPARTMENTS LPN29°03'10"E 188.49'S39°32'19"E 208.65'S50°29'56"W 174.97'N39°44'57"W 139.73'LANDS OFJDBS WINTERSPRINGS, LLCPROPOSED DUMPSTER PAD (SEE ARCH PLANS FOR DETAILS) 4 PROPOSED "STOP" SIGN TYPE R1-1 PER FDOT MUTCD PROPOSED 48" DIRECTION ARROWS AND 48" TALL X 12" WIDE PAVEMENT MARKINGS (TYP.) PROPOSED TYPE "D" CURB PER FDOT STANDARD PLANS 520-001 (TYP.)PROPOSED ATM CANOPY COVER (SEE ARCH PLANS FOR DETAILS) 24.0' 9.0' TYP. 18.0' TYP. 18.0' TYP. 9.0' TYP. 5 5 9.0' TYP. 18.0' TYP. 12.0' TYP. 5.0' TYP. PROPOSED 48" DIRECTION ARROW PAVEMENT MARKINGS (TYP.) PROPOSED CURB RAMP TYPE CR-E WITH DETECTABLE WARNING PROPOSED ADA ACCESSIBLE SPACE AND SIGN PROPOSED CURB RAMP TYPE CR-B WITH DETECTABLE WARNING PROPOSED TYPE "D" CURB PER FDOT STANDARD PLANS 520-001 (TYP.) PROPOSED TYPE "D" CURB PER FDOT STANDARD PLANS 520-001 (TYP.) SAWCUT AND MATCH EXISTING (TYP.) SAWCUT AND MATCH EXISTING (TYP.) SAWCUT AND MATCH EXISTING (TYP.) PROPOSED "DO NOT ENTER" SIGN TYPE R5-1 PER FDOT MUTCD PROPOSED "DO NOT ENTER" SIGN TYPE R5-1 PER FDOT MUTCD PROPOSED 24" STOP LINE PAVEMENT MARKING (TYP) AND 6" DOUBLE SOLID LINE PER FDOT STANDARD PLANS 711-001 PROPOSED 24" STOP LINE PAVEMENT MARKING (TYP) AND 6" DOUBLE SOLID LINE PER FDOT STANDARD PLANS 711-001 PROPOSED "STOP" SIGN TYPE R1-1 PER FDOT MUTCD 17.5' 24.0' 8.3' 7.8'6.0' 28.5' 24.0' R3.0' TYP. R10.0' R10.0' R10.0' R10.0' R3.0' TYP. R10.0' R97.0' R73.0' R10.0' R8.0' R10.0' R14.5' R3.0' TYP. 27.0' 27.3' 6.0' TYP. 6.0' 9.0' 6.4' PROPOSED 48" TALL X 12" WIDE PAVEMENT MARKINGS (TYP.) R1.0' 9.0' 6.0' PROPOSED BIKE RACK (3 BIKE SPACES) 5.0' 5.0' 5.5' PROPOSED RAMP WITH HANDRAILS PER F.A.C. 505 PROPOSED 6-FOOT WIDE PAVER CROSSWALK W/ 12-INCH "WHITE" STRIPE @ 36" O.C. (CONTINUOUS PAINT) 6.6' 5.6' RELOCATE EXISTING SCHOOL SIGN (DO NOT BLOCK BUS SIGN) 6.0' 8.0' 6.0' 5 3 BANK7/7/2021 149568016NEBKMAS NOTEDDD1CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS3/24/2021NEBSR 434 & TUSKAWILLAWINTER SPRINGS , FLORIDA 32708©2CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS5/10/2021NEB3BUILDING REVISION AND RECLAIM PIPE ADDITION6/25/2021NEB4SIDEWALK AND LANDSCAPE REVISIONS7/07/2021NEBLEGEND CHASE BOUNDARY SETBACK LINE PROPOSED SIGN STANDARD DUTY CONCRETE FOR SIDEWALKS X PARKING COUNT CONCRETE PAVEMENT SITE ANALYSIS TABLE GENERAL CHASE BANK 3,357 S.F. EXISTING ZONING / FUTURE LAND USE T-5 TOWN CENTER DISTRICT PROPOSED ZONING / FUTURE LAND USE TOWN CENTER DISTRICT ADJACENT ZONING TOWN CENTER DISTRICT (N); TOWN CENTER DISTRICT (E); TOWN CENTER DISTRICT (S); TOWN CENTER DISTRICT (W) EXISTING USE VACANT LAND PROPOSED USE BANK W/ DRIVE-THRU HOURS OF OPERATION MONDAY-FRIDAY: 9AM-5PM SATURDAY: 9AM-2PM PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT 25'-7" (1 STORY) SITE DATA FLOOD ZONE FLOOD ZONE "X" - 12117CO160F SITE ACREAGE 0.70 ACRES (30,532 SF) IMPERVIOUS AREA 0.48 ACRES (20,793 SF) PERVIOUS AREA 0.23 ACRES (9,739 SF) LOT CRITERIA FAR 0.11 PARKING STANDARD SPACES (9'X18') = 19 SPACES HANDICAP SPACES (12'X18') = 3 SPACES TOTAL = 22 SPACES BICYCLE PARKING 6 BICYCLE SPACES SETBACKS REQUIRED PROVIDED FRONT (R.O.W):25' MIN; 50' MAX 50' SIDE YARD:5' MIN.; 100' MAX 41' (E); 70' (W) REAR:15' MIN 46.4' BUILDING FRONTAGE 20% MIN 30.6% PHASING THIS PROJECT WILL BE COMPLETED IN ONE PHASE. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 1, WSTC OCEAN BLEU, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 84, PAGES 37 AND 38, PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA. GEOTECH REPORT BY TERRACON CONSULLTANTS, INC. DATED 10/30/2018 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT THIS DEVELOPMENT COMPLIES WITH THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED AND CONSTRUCTED MASTER STORMWATER DRAINAGE SYSTEM UNDER THE SAONT JOHN'S RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SJRWMD) ERP # 95027.011. THE MASTER PERMIT ALLOWS FOR 80% IMPERVIOUS AREA FOR THE SITE. THIS PROJECT PROPOSES 68% IMPERVIOUS AREA WHICH IS LESS THAN THE MAX ALLOWABLE FOR THE SITE THEREFORE ADDITIONAL STORMWATER TREATMENT AND DETENTION IS NOT REQUIRED. C-300SITE PLANNORTHASPHALT PAVEMENT NOTE: EXISTING SITE LAYOUT, UTILITY INVERTS, AND GRADE ELEVATIONS TAKEN FROM CAD LINEWORK AND PLANS PREPARED BY LEADING EDGE LAND SERVICES DATED 05/21/2020. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING EXISTING INFORMATION SHOWN PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FURNISHING ALL MATERIAL AND LABOR TO CONSTRUCT THE FACILITY AS SHOWN AND DESCRIBED IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROPRIATE APPROVING AUTHORITIES, SPECIFICATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS. 2.EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE LOCATED ACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO THE ENGINEER AT THE TIME OF THE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER. GUARANTEE IS NOT MADE THAT ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN OR THAT THE LOCATION OF THOSE SHOWN ARE ENTIRELY ACCURATE. FINDING THE ACTUAL LOCATION OF ANY EXISTING UTILITIES IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY AND SHALL BE DONE BEFORE HE COMMENCES ANY WORK IN THE VICINITY. FURTHERMORE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES DUE TO THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. THE OWNER OR ENGINEER WILL ASSUME NO LIABILITY FOR ANY DAMAGES SUSTAINED OR COST INCURRED BECAUSE OF THE OPERATIONS IN THE VICINITY OF EXISTING UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES, NOR FOR TEMPORARY BRACING AND SHORING OF SAME. IF IT IS NECESSARY TO SHORE, BRACE, SWING OR RELOCATE A UTILITY, THE UTILITY COMPANY OR DEPARTMENT AFFECTED SHALL BE CONTACTED AND THEIR PERMISSION OBTAINED REGARDING THE METHOD TO USE FOR SUCH WORK. 3.IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES WHICH MAY HAVE BURIED OR AERIAL UTILITIES WITHIN OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION AREA BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE 48 HOURS MINIMUM NOTICE TO ALL UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. A LIST OF THE UTILITY COMPANIES WHICH THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL BEFORE COMMENCING WORK IS PROVIDED ON THE COVER SHEET OF THESE CONSTRUCTION PLANS. THIS LIST SERVES AS A GUIDE ONLY AND IS NOT INTENDED TO LIMIT THE UTILITY COMPANIES WHICH THE CONTRACTOR MAY WISH TO NOTIFY. FLORIDA LAW (F.S. 556) UNDERGROUND FACILITY DAMAGE PREVENTION AND SAFETY ACT MANDATES THAT EXCAVATORS/CONTRACTORS SHALL CONTACT SUNSHINE 811 (FKA: SUNSHINE STATE ONE-CALL OF FLORIDA) BY CALLING 800-432-4770 OR 811 AT LEAST 2 FULL BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY EXCAVATION OR DEMOLITION TO ALLOW MEMBER OPERATORS AN OPPORTUNITY TO IDENTIFY AND MARK THEIR UNDERGROUND FACILITIES AND APPROPRIATELY RESPONSE TO THE POSITIVE RESPONSE SYSTEM. 4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND BONDS IF REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE AVAILABLE AT THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES ONE COPY OF THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS INCLUDING PLANS AND COPIES OF ANY REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION PERMITS. 6.ANY DISCREPANCIES ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER AND ENGINEER BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. NO FIELD CHANGES OR DEVIATIONS FROM DESIGN ARE TO BE MADE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE OWNER AND NOTIFICATION TO THE ENGINEER. 7.ALL COPIES OF COMPACTION, CONCRETE AND OTHER REQUIRED TEST RESULTS ARE TO BE SENT TO THE OWNER AND DESIGN ENGINEER OF RECORD DIRECTLY FROM THE TESTING AGENCY. 8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SUBMITTING TO THE ENGINEER A CERTIFIED RECORD SURVEY SIGNED AND SEALED BY A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA DEPICTING THE ACTUAL FIELD LOCATION OF ALL CONSTRUCTED IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE REQUIRED BY THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES FOR THE CERTIFICATION PROCESS. ALL SURVEY COSTS WILL BE THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY. 9.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DOCUMENTING AND MAINTAINING AS-BUILT INFORMATION WHICH SHALL BE RECORDED AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES OR AT THE COMPLETION OF APPROPRIATE CONSTRUCTION INTERVALS AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AS-BUILT DRAWINGS TO THE OWNER FOR THE PURPOSE OF CERTIFICATION TO JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES AS REQUIRED. ALL AS-BUILT DATA SHALL BE COLLECTED BY A STATE OF FLORIDA PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR WHOSE SERVICES ARE ENGAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 10.ANY WELL DISCOVERED DURING EARTH MOVING OR EXCAVATION SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE APPROPRIATE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER DISCOVERY IS MADE. ANY WELLS DISCOVERED ON SITE THAT WILL HAVE NO USE MUST BE PLUGGED BY A LICENSED WELL DRILLING CONTRACTOR IN A MANNER APPROVED BY ALL JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY WELL ABANDONMENT PERMITS REQUIRED. 11.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THAT THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS DO NOT CONFLICT WITH ANY KNOWN EXISTING OR OTHER PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. IF ANY CONFLICTS ARE DISCOVERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PORTION OF THE SITE WORK THAT WOULD BE AFFECTED. FAILURE TO NOTIFY OWNER OF AN IDENTIFIABLE CONFLICT PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH INSTALLATION RELIEVES OWNER OF ANY OBLIGATION TO PAY FOR A RELATED CHANGE ORDER. 12.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE FROM FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. RADIUS DIMENSIONS AT PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS ALONG TURN-IN AND TURN-OUT ARE TO EDGE OF PAVEMENT. ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: 1.THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE. WHEN PERFORMING GRADING OPERATIONS DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING, DRAINAGE AND GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS. 2.ALL WM GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. OUTLOT AREA TO BE KEPT FREE OF JOB TRAILERS AND STORAGE AFTER THE CONTRACT MILESTONE DATE FOR THE OUTLOT. WM GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE CLEAR ACCESS FOR OUTLOT CONTRACTOR TO THE SPECIFIC PARCEL AT ALL TIMES AFTER MILESTONE DATE. PURCHASER OF OUTLOT TO PROVIDE PERMIT DOCUMENTS AND SWPPP REQUIRED BY STATE/LOCAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIFIC OUTLOT. Know what's below. before you dig.Call R CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS NOTES 1.ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REGULATIONS AND CODES. 2.ALTERNATIVE PAVEMENT MATERIAL WILL BE USED THROUGHOUT PAINT/THERMOPLASTIC IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. 3.ALL GRASS AREAS ON THE PROPERTY SHALL USE BAHIA GRASS. NO ST. AUGUSTINE GRASS OR GRASS TYPE WITH LOW DROUGHT TOLERANCE SHALL BE PERMITTED. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 4 4 4 4 172 BANK3/24/2021 149568016NEBKMAS NOTEDDD1CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS3/24/2021NEBSR 434 & TUSKAWILLAWINTER SPRINGS , FLORIDA 32708©2CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS5/10/2021NEBC-301SITE PLAN DETAILSN.T.S.12"’ (2" TYP.)2"R7-8P R7-8 18"X12" SIGN TYPICAL AT ALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES 12"X6" PLAQUE TYPICAL AT ALL VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES 12"X9" PENALTY SIGN WITH WORDING AS REQUIRED BY STATE OR PER LOCAL CODE GREEN LEGEND WHITE SYMBOL ON BLUE ON WHITE BACKGROUND GREEN LEGEND ON WHITE BACKGROUND ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN N.T.S. MIN. 60" ABOVE GROUND BACK OF CURB MODIFIED TYPE "D" CURB DETAIL N.T.S. 2" RADIUS 8" 6"12"6"(REFER TO PAVEMENT SECTIONS)12" NOTE: ·SEE 2018-19 FDOT STANDARD PLANS INDEX 520-001 FOR FURTHER DETAILS. N.T.S. N.T.S. 1 N.T.S. 1 1 2 173 CO CO CO COCO CO CO LANDS OFMcDONALD'S RESTAURANTSOF FLORIDA, INC.O.R. 2803, PG. 632LANDS OFWINTER SPRINGSAPARTMENTS LPN29°03'10"E 188.49'S39°32'19"E 208.65'S50°29'56"W 174.97'N39°44'57"W 139.73'LANDS OFJDBS WINTERSPRINGS, LLC+/- 3,357 S.F. F.F.E 41.20 THRUONLYDRIVEUP ATMDO NOT ENTERTNO PARKING FIRE LANE EB EB EB PULL BOXohohohohohohohPICK UP WINDOW PICK UPWINDOWWWW W Wwm wm wm wm wm wm wm SANSANSANSANSANSAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN S A N EAGLE EDGE LANE(62' R/W PER ORB 9329, PG 443)STATE ROAD 434 (SANFORD - OVIEDO ROAD) (R/W WIDTH VARIES) SEA HAWK COVE (62' R/W) TRACT "D" PER PB 82, PG 63-66 wm wm wm wm wmSANSANSANSAN SAN SAN SAN ONLY40.038.0 38.5 39.039.540.541.041.541 . 5 41.541.0 40.0 39.5 40.5 41.0 42.5 43. 0 4 3 . 5 40.0 38. 0 38.5 39.0 39.5 40.5 41.0 41.5 42.0 38.5 38.0 38.5 39.0 1.74%1.53%3.55%1.57%1.90%0.75% 1.00%1.18% 0.96%5.30%37.92 ME 38.78 ME 39.73 ME 40.95 ME 43.48 ME 43.72 ME 43.10 ME 37.58 ME 38.40 ME 38.63 ME 40.63 ME 40.22 ME 40.35 ME 41.50 ME 39.56 39.91 39.10 38.75 39.69 39.05 42.37 41.92 42.61 38.00 38.16 38.73 38.10 38.12 38.81 39.00 38.08 38.18 38.58 38.29 39.07 39.12 39.00 39.15 39.05 39.80 TOC 39.65 40.92 41.02 39.74 41.20 39.30 39.70 40.95 41.09 41.20 41.20 41.27 40.67 41.14 41.14 40.51 40.60 40.63 40.72 40.97 41.47 TOC 40.90 41.55 41.0241.0041.15 42.23 41.61 41.87 42.56 43.24 43.12 43.35 38.91 39.24 39.34 39.43 40.25 40.36 40.41 41.10 TOC 41.20 41.13 40.00 40.67 41.02 41.11 40.60 41.16 38.23 38.28 39.69 ST-01 20 LF OF 18" RCP 24 L F O F 1 0 " P V C ST-02 33 LF OF 10 " PVC ST-03 35 LF OF 10" PVC ST-04 89 LF OF 8" PVCST-05 43 LF OF 8" PVC ST-06 14 L F O F 8 " P V C ST-0773 LF OF 8" PVCST-08 EX-ST-28 40.92 38.21 38.28 38.37 41.92 40.89 3.55%3.28%5.57%4.23%4.23%4.23%42.82 47 LF OF 18" RCP 143 LF OF 18" RCP ST-09 ST-10 82 LF OF 18" R C P ST-11 41.94 ME 41.75 ME42.16 ME42.16 ME 42.49 ME 42.64 ME DRAINAGE SCHEDULE ST-# EX-ST-28 ST-01 ST-02 ST-03 ST-04 ST-05 STRUCTURE TYPE AND DETAILS: CURB INLET GRATE EL. 36.72' NE INV EL. 30.52' RIM: ??? INV IN: 30.55 GRATE INLET FDOT STANDARD PLANS 425 RIM: 38.46 INV IN: 30.65 INV IN: 30.65 INV OUT: 30.65 CLEAN OUT RIM: 38.38 INV IN: 30.77 INV OUT: 30.77 CLEAN OUT RIM: 41.01 INV IN: 30.93 INV OUT: 30.93 CLEAN OUT RIM: 40.15 INV IN: 31.10 INV OUT: 31.10 CLEAN OUT RIM: 41.47 INV IN: 31.54 INV OUT: 31.54 PIPES IN: FROM ST-01, 18" RCP INV IN: 30.55 @ 0.50% FROM ST-09, 18" RCP INV IN: 30.65 @ 0.50% FROM ST-02, 10" PVC INV IN: 30.65 @ 0.50% FROM ST-03, 10" PVC INV IN: 30.77 @ 0.50% FROM ST-04, 10" PVC INV IN: 30.93 @ 0.50% FROM ST-05, 8" PVC INV IN: 31.10 @ 0.50% FROM ST-06, 8" PVC INV IN: 31.54 @ 0.50% PIPES OUT TO EX-ST-28, 18" RCP INV OUT: 30.65 @ 0.50% TO ST-01, 10" PVC INV OUT: 30.77 @ 0.50% TO ST-02, 10" PVC INV OUT: 30.93 @ 0.50% TO ST-03, 10" PVC INV OUT: 31.10 @ 0.50% TO ST-04, 8" PVC INV OUT: 31.54 @ 0.50% DRAINAGE SCHEDULE ST-# ST-06 ST-07 ST-08 ST-09 ST-10 ST-11 STRUCTURE TYPE AND DETAILS: CLEAN OUT RIM: 41.64 INV IN: 31.75 INV OUT: 31.75 CLEAN OUT RIM: 41.55 INV IN: 31.82 INV OUT: 31.82 CLEAN OUT RIM: 40.33 INV OUT: 32.18 GRATE INLET RIM: 37.99 INV IN: 30.88 INV OUT: 30.88 MANHOLE RIM: 42.82 INV IN: 31.59 INV OUT: 31.59 GRATE INLET RIM: 40.97 INV OUT: 32.00 PIPES IN: FROM ST-07, 8" PVC INV IN: 31.75 @ 0.50% FROM ST-08, 8" PVC INV IN: 31.82 @ 0.50% FROM ST-10, 18" RCP INV IN: 30.88 @ 0.50% FROM ST-11, 18" RCP INV IN: 31.59 @ 0.50% PIPES OUT TO ST-05, 8" PVC INV OUT: 31.75 @ 0.50% TO ST-06, 8" PVC INV OUT: 31.82 @ 0.50% TO ST-07, 8" PVC INV OUT: 32.18 @ 0.50% TO ST-01, 18" RCP INV OUT: 30.88 @ 0.50% TO ST-09, 18" RCP INV OUT: 31.59 @ 0.50% TO ST-10, 18" RCP INV OUT: 32.00 @ 0.50% Know what's below. before you dig.Call R BANK7/7/2021 149568016NEBKMAS NOTEDDD1CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS3/24/2021NEBSR 434 & TUSKAWILLAWINTER SPRINGS , FLORIDA 32708©2CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS5/10/2021NEB3BUILDING REVISION AND RECLAIM PIPE ADDITION6/25/2021NEB4SIDEWALK AND LANDSCAPE REVISIONS7/07/2021NEBC-500GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANEXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED SLOPE PROPOSED SPOT GRADE PROPOSED STORM SEWER PIPE XX.XX CO PROPOSED CLEANOUT PROPOSED SPOT GRADE TOP OF CURB XX.XX TC PROPOSED SPOT GRADE MATCH EXISTING GRADE XX.XX ME PROPOSED LIGHTING FIXTURE STANDARD DUTY CONCRETE FOR SIDEWALKS CONCRETE PAVEMENT NOTE: EXISTING SITE LAYOUT, UTILITY INVERTS, AND GRADE ELEVATIONS TAKEN FROM CAD LINEWORK AND PLANS PREPARED BY LEADING EDGE LAND SERVICES DATED 05/21/2020. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING EXISTING INFORMATION SHOWN PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ELEVATIONS BASED ON SEMINOLE COUNTY BENCHMARK #4733701, HAVING AN ELEVATION OF 44.4500 FEET, (NAVD 88). EXISTING STORM PIPE EXISTING STORM INLET LEGEND CHASE BOUNDARY PROPOSED SIGNNORTH GRADING NOTES 1.THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE EXISTING SITE LAYOUT, UTILITY INVERTS, AND GRADE ELEVATIONS AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS TAKEN FROM CAD LINEWORK AND PLANS PREPARED BY GEOPOINT SURVEY, INC. DATED 10/29/2016. THE INFORMATION HAS NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER AND IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING EXISTING INFORMATION SHOWN PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2.IF THE CONTRACTOR DOES NOT ACCEPT EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, WITHOUT EXCEPTION, THEN THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY, AT THEIR EXPENSE, A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR TO THE OWNER FOR REVIEW. 3.THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. FLORIDA LAW (F.S. 556) UNDERGROUND FACILITY DAMAGE PREVENTION AND SAFETY ACT MANDATES THAT EXCAVATORS/CONTRACTORS SHALL CONTACT SUNSHINE 811 (FKA: SUNSHINE STATE ONE-CALL OF FLORIDA) BY CALLING 800-432-4770 OR 811 AT LEAST 2 FULL BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY EXCAVATION OR DEMOLITION TO ALLOW MEMBER OPERATORS AN OPPORTUNITY TO IDENTIFY AND MARK THEIR UNDERGROUND FACILITIES AND APPROPRIATELY RESPONSE TO THE POSITIVE RESPONSE SYSTEM. 4.ALL CUT OR FILL SLOPES SHALL BE 3:1 OR FLATTER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5.PRECAST STRUCTURES MAY BE USED AT CONTRACTORS OPTION. 6.EXISTING PIPES TO BE CLEANED OUT TO REMOVE ALL SILT AND DEBRIS. 7.IF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES TO REMAIN ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AS NECESSARY TO RETURN IT TO EXISTING CONDITIONS OR BETTER. 8.ALL STORM PIPE ENTERING STRUCTURES SHALL BE GROUTED TO ASSURE CONNECTION AT STRUCTURE IS WATERTIGHT. 9.ALL STORM SEWER MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE FLUSH WITH PAVEMENT, AND SHALL HAVE TRAFFIC BEARING RING & COVERS. MANHOLES IN UNPAVED AREAS SHALL BE 6" ABOVE FINISH GRADE. LIDS SHALL BE LABELED "STORM SEWER". 10.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADHERE TO ALL TERMS & CONDITIONS AS OUTLINED IN THE EPA OR APPLICABLE STATE GENERAL N.P.D.E.S. PERMIT FOR STORM WATER DISCHARGE ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AS WELL AS WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT AND CITY REQUIREMENTS. 11.CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST AND/OR CUT EXISTING PAVEMENT AS NECESSARY TO ASSURE A SMOOTH FIT AND CONTINUOUS GRADE. 12.CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM BUILDINGS FOR ALL NATURAL AND PAVED AREAS. 13.ALL UNSURFACED AREAS DISTURBED BY GRADING OPERATION SHALL RECEIVE 4 INCHES OF TOPSOIL. CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY STABILIZATION FABRIC TO ALL SLOPES 3H:1V OR STEEPER. CONTRACTOR SHALL STABILIZE DISTURBED AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF VEGETATION IS OBTAINED. 14.CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO SAME. 15.ALL STORM STRUCTURES SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH UNIFORM POURED MORTAR INVERT FROM INVERT IN TO INVERT OUT. 16.PIPE LENGTHS LISTED ARE BASED ON HORIZONTAL DISTANCE FROM CENTER OF STRUCTURE TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE AND USED FOR DESIGN. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY ACTUAL PIPE LENGTHS NEEDED FOR CONSTRUCTION. 17.THE DATUM SHOWN ON THE GRADING PLAN IS NAVD 88. 18.SIDEWALKS ARE DESIGNED TO MEET ADA REQUIREMENTS WITH A MAXIMUM LONGITUDINAL SLOPE OF 5% AND A MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE OF 2%. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF SLOPES DO NOT MEET THESE ADA REQUIREMENTS. 19.SIDEWALKS ARE NOT TO EXCEED 5% ALONG THE PATH UNLESS SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED OTHERWISE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF SLOPES DO NOT MEET THESE ADA REQUIREMENTS. 20.ADA PARKING SPACES ARE NOT TO EXCEED 2% IN ANY DIRECTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF SLOPES DO NOT MEET THESE ADA REQUIREMENTS. 21.ALL EXTERIOR SLOPES, NEW CONSTRUCTION, SHALL BE VERIFIED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH LOCALLY ADOPTED ACCESSIBILITY REGULATIONS AND SHALL BE MEASURED WITH A 24" SMART LEVEL. CROSS SLOPES IN ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE 2% MAXIMUM. 22.SPOT ELEVATIONS ALONG CURBLINE ARE SHOWN AT THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 23.SPOT SHOTS LABELED 'ME' ARE TO MATCH EXISTING GRADES. 24.SPOT SHOTS LABELED 'TC' ARE TOP OF CURB. 25.PVC PIPE TO BE ANSI/AWWA C900 FOR NOMINAL DIAMETERS 4-INCH THROUGH 12-INCH. ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: 1.THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE. WHEN PERFORMING GRADING OPERATIONS DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING, DRAINAGE AND GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS. 2.ALL WM GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. OUTLOT AREA TO BE KEPT FREE OF JOB TRAILERS AND STORAGE AFTER THE CONTRACT MILESTONE DATE FOR THE OUTLOT. WM GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE CLEAR ACCESS FOR OUTLOT CONTRACTOR TO THE SPECIFIC PARCEL AT ALL TIMES AFTER MILESTONE DATE. PURCHASER OF OUTLOT TO PROVIDE PERMIT DOCUMENTS AND SWPPP REQUIRED BY STATE/LOCAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIFIC OUTLOT. 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 4 174 1.74%1.53% 1.00% 0.96% 40.63 ME 40.22 ME 40.35 ME 40.95 41.09 41.20 41.20 41.27 40.67 41.14 41.14 40.51 40.60 40.63 40.7289 LF OF 8" PVCCO CO CO DRIVE41.0 40.5 41.0 1.90%5.30%39.07 39.65 40.92 41.02 41.20 39.6933 LF OF 10 " PVC ST-03 35 LF OF 10" PVC ST-04 89 LF OF 8" PVCST-08 40.92 CODO NOT ENTERT40.0 39.5 40.5 38.5 38.10 38.12 39.00 38.08 38.18 38.58 38.29 40.25 40.41 38.23 38.28 24 L F O F 1 0 " P V C 33 LF OF 10 " PVC 38.21 38.28 38.37 Know what's below. before you dig.Call R BANK7/7/2021 149568016NEBKMAS NOTEDDD1CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS3/24/2021NEBSR 434 & TUSKAWILLAWINTER SPRINGS , FLORIDA 32708©2CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS5/10/2021NEB3BUILDING REVISION AND RECLAIM PIPE ADDITION6/25/2021NEB4SIDEWALK AND LANDSCAPE REVISIONS7/07/2021NEBC-501GRADING AND DRAINAGE DETAILSSOUTHEAST ENTRANCE DETAIL SCALE:1" = 10'NORTHATM DRIVE-THRU GRADING DETAIL SCALE:1" = 10'NORTHNORTHEAST ENTRANCE DETAIL SCALE:1" = 5'NORTH175 CO CO CO COCO CO CO CO COMBFP +/- 3,357 S.F. F.F.E 41.20 TNO PARKING FIRE LANE EB EB EB PULL BOXohohohohohohohPICK UP WINDOW PICK UPWINDOWWWW W Wwm wm wm wm wm wm wm 2" PVC PIPE IN GROUND (UNKNOWN UTILITY) TOP=37.72 NE INV=26.72 SE INV=26.92 W. INV=27.05 SANSANSANSANSANSAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN S A N EAGLE EDGE LANE(62' R/W PER ORB 9329, PG 443)STATE ROAD 434 (SANFORD - OVIEDO ROAD) (R/W WIDTH VARIES) SEA HAWK COVE (62' R/W) TRACT "D" PER PB 82, PG 63-66 wm wm wm wm wmSANSANSANSAN SAN SAN SAN ONLYLANDS OFMcDONALD'S RESTAURANTSOF FLORIDA, INC.O.R. 2803, PG. 632LANDS OFWINTER SPRINGSAPARTMENTS LPN29°03'10"E 188.49'S39°32'19"E 208.65'S50°29'56"W 174.97'N39°44'57"W 139.73'LANDS OFJDBS WINTERSPRINGS, LLCASSUMED LOCATION AND SIZE OF PROPOSED COMMUNICATIONS, FIBER OPTIC, AND ELECTRIC LINES AND CONNECTION POINT (COORDINATE WITH APPROPRIATE UTILITY PROVIDER) PROPOSED 1" PVC WATER SERVICE PROPOSED TRANSFORMER PAD PROPOSED MANUAL TRANSFER SWITCH PROPOSED ELECTRICAL CONDUIT PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT PER CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS DETAIL (4) 1" CONDUIT & (2) 1.25" CONDUIT W/ PULL WIRE FOR ATM (BY OTHERS) EXISTING CLEANOUT. PROPOSED CONNECTION TO EXISTING PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER. RIM EL.+/-39.60' & INV EL.: +/-28.75' PROPOSED COMMUNICATIONS CONDUITS. (BY OTHERS) EXISTING CAP TO BE REMOVED. CONNECTION POINT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN PROPOSED FIBER AND TELEPHONE ENTRY PROPOSED TELEPHONE CONDUIT PROPOSED FIBER OPTIC PROPOSED 5/8" WATER METER AND 3/4" BACKFLOW PREVENTER PROPOSED 10" TAP PROPOSED 10" WATERMAIN EX-SS-01 PROPOSED SANITARY CONNECTION RIM: 39.60' INV. IN 4": 28.75 SS-02 CLEAN OUT RIM: 38.93 INV. IN 4": 28.84 INV. IN 4": 28.84 INV. OUT 4": 28.84 SS-03 CLEAN OUT RIM: 42.71 INV. OUT 4": 29.04 SS-04 SANITARY DRAIN RIM: 29.85 INV. OUT 4": 29.48 PROPOSED 10" CAP PROPOSED 10"X6" TEE PROPOSED 10" GATE VALVE PROPOSED 6" GATE VALVE PROPOSED 10" TEE PROPOSED 10"X1" REDUCER PROPOSED 2" RECLAIM WATER LINE FOR IRRIGATION PROPOSED CONNECTION TO EXISTING 4" RECLAIM WATER LINE PROPOSED CONNECTION TO PROPOSED IRRIGATION WATER METER. SEE IRRIGATION PLAN FOR CONTINUATION. Know what's below. before you dig.Call R BANK7/7/2021 149568016NEBKMAS NOTEDDD1CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS3/24/2021NEBSR 434 & TUSKAWILLAWINTER SPRINGS , FLORIDA 32708©2CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS5/10/2021NEB3BUILDING REVISION AND RECLAIM PIPE ADDITION6/25/2021NEB4SIDEWALK AND LANDSCAPE REVISIONS7/07/2021NEBC-600UTILITY PLANLEGEND CHASE BOUNDARYNORTH T PROPOSED CLEANOUT PROPOSED UNDERGROUND CONDUIT PROPOSED UNDERGROUND CONDUIT PROPOSED WATER LINE PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LINE EXISTING STORM SEWER PIPE CO EXISTING GRATE INLET S EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED FIRE LINE PROPOSED TRANSFORMER PROPOSED MANUAL TRANSFER SWITCH UTILITY NOTES 1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT GRAVITY SEWER LATERALS, MANHOLES GRAVITY SEWER LINES AND DOMESTIC WATER AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL NECESSARY MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, MACHINERY, TOOLS, MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION AND LABOR NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK IN FULL AND COMPLETE ACCORDANCE WITH THE SHOWN, DESCRIBED AND REASONABLY INTENDED REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN. 2.ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS AND/OR ELEVATIONS WERE TAKEN FROM CAD LINEWORK AND PLANS PREPARED BY GEOPOINT SURVEY, INC. DATED 11/3/2019. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 3.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE LOCAL AUTHORITIES (ANY CITY) WITH REGARDS TO MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION OF THE WATER AND SEWER LINES. 4.DEFLECTION OF PIPE JOINTS AND CURVATURE OF PIPE SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. SECURELY CLOSE ALL OPEN ENDS OF PIPE AND FITTINGS WITH A WATERTIGHT PLUG WHEN WORK IS NOT IN PROGRESS. THE INTERIOR OF ALL PIPES SHALL BE CLEAN AND JOINT SURFACES WIPED CLEAN AND DRY AFTER THE PIPE HAS BEEN LOWERED INTO THE TRENCH. VALVES SHALL BE PLUMB AND LOCATED ACCORDING TO THE PLANS. 5.ALL PHASES OF INSTALLATION, INCLUDING UNLOADING, TRENCHING, LAYING AND BACK FILLING, SHALL BE DONE IN A FIRST CLASS WORKMANLIKE MANNER. ALL PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BE CAREFULLY STORED FOLLOWING MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THE COATING OR LINING IN ANY D.I. PIPE FITTINGS. ANY PIPE OR FITTING WHICH IS DAMAGED OR WHICH HAS FLAWS OR IMPERFECTIONS WHICH, IN THE OPINION OF THE ENGINEER OR OWNER, RENDERS IT UNFIT FOR USE, SHALL NOT BE USED. ANY PIPE NOT SATISFACTORY FOR USE SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKED AND IMMEDIATELY REMOVED FROM THE JOB SITE, AND SHALL BE REPLACED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 6.WATER FOR FIRE FIGHTING SHALL BE AVAILABLE FOR USE PRIOR TO COMBUSTIBLES BEING BROUGHT ON SITE. 7.ALL UTILITY AND STORM DRAIN TRENCHES LOCATED UNDER AREAS TO RECEIVE PAVING SHALL BE COMPLETELY BACK FILLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GOVERNING JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY'S SPECIFICATIONS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN. 8.UNDERGROUND LINES SHALL BE SURVEYED BY A STATE OF FLORIDA PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR BEFORE BACK FILLING. 9.CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM, AT HIS OWN EXPENSE, ANY AND ALL TESTS REQUIRED BY THE SPECIFICATIONS AND/OR ANY AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION. THESE TESTS MAY INCLUDE, BUT MAY NOT BE LIMITED TO, INFILTRATION AND EXFILTRATION, TELEVISION INSPECTION AND A MANDREL TEST ON GRAVITY SEWER. A COPY OF THE TEST RESULTS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE UTILITY PROVIDER, OWNER AND JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY AS REQUIRED. 10.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL DISTURBED VEGETATION IN KIND, UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. 11.ALL UTILITIES LOCATED OUTSIDE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAYS AND PUBLIC EASEMENTS SHALL BE PRIVATELY OWNED AND MAINTAINED 12.MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 3 FEET OF COVER OVER ALL PROPOSED WATER, WASTEWATER, AND RECLAIMED WATER LINES. 13.ALL UTILITY WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REGULATIONS AND CODES SET FORTH IN THE LATEST . NOTE: EXISTING SITE LAYOUT, UTILITY INVERTS, AND GRADE ELEVATIONS TAKEN FROM CAD LINEWORK AND PLANS PREPARED BY LEADING EDGE LAND SERVICES DATED 05/21/2020. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING EXISTING INFORMATION SHOWN PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS PUBLIC WORKS NOTES 1.ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CURRENT CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS WATER AND SEWER DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS. 2.ALL ROLL OFF CONSTRUCTION DUMPSTER'S SHALL BE FURNISHED BY WASTE PRO, PER THE CITY'S SOLID WASTE FRANCHISE AGREEMENT. 3.NO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT OPERATION BETWEEN 10 PM AND 7 AM, PER THE CITY NOISE ORDINANCE. NOISE ORDINANCE APPLIES TO SUNDAYS AND HOLIDAYS. 4. ALL SANITARY AND STORM PIPING SYSTEMS SHALL BE VIDEO INSPECTED PRIOR TO SITE ACCEPTANCE. 5. A COPY OF THE VIDEO AND REPORT ARE TO BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY FOR REVIEW. 6. NO ON-SITE BURNING IS PERMITTED WITHIN THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS. 7.A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS NOTICE IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO ALL INSPECTIONS. 8.THIS PARCEL'S SHARE OF THE ARBOR MITIGATION FEE WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. 1 1 2 3 34 176 13.2 14.7 16.3 18.1 11.5 12.8 14.3 15.8 17.6 19.5 21.6 12.4 13.8 15.4 17.1 18.9 20.9 23.0 25.1 12.1 13.5 15.0 16.6 18.4 20.3 22.3 24.3 26.4 28.3 13.1 14.6 16.3 18.119.9 21.8 23.8 25.7 27.6 29.3 14.1 15.9 17.7 19.7 21.6 23.5 25.327.1 28.8 30.2 15.2 17.2 19.2 21.3 23.3 25.2 27.0 28.5 29.8 30.9 18.4 20.6 22.8 25.0 26.9 28.6 29.9 30.9 21.8 24.2 26.5 28.5 30.1 31.2 31.8 25.4 27.7 29.8 31.3 1.01.31.41.42.0 1.6 1.9 1.9 1.42.32.83.22.61.81.61.72.22.4 3.6 4.43.32.1 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.2 3.33.74.54.23.33.02.62.32.01.92.62.6 4.05.14.83.4 3.43.3 2.7 2.2 2.0 1.9 2.6 4.1 2.42.73.84.63.93.83.52.82.11.92.12.5 2.6 2.8 3.72.0 3.03.6 4.23.2 3.5 4.03.2 2.1 1.5 1.4 1.7 2.4 2.7 2.52.73.7 1.02.23.24.55.33.83.93.72.51.01.21.62.2 2.6 2.6 2.2 2.0 2.0 0.41.01.92.6 4.45.0 3.9 4.0 3.2 0.9 1.0 1.4 2.12.31.8 1.6 1.81.7 0.61.32.22.74.54.43.43.50.70.9 1.3 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.40.30.71.42.4 3.1 4.3 3.9 3.3 3.2 0.7 0.8 1.01.4 1.81.71.61.51.40.20.40.71.21.62.23.32.9 2.8 2.9 2.1 0.9 1.42.02.3 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.50.5 0.8 1.2 1.5 2.0 2.52.22.32.41.9 1.31.72.43.02.82.62.11.51.30.50.81.11.52.0 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.1 1.9 1.82.22.6 2.93.1 4.44.02.1 1.60.6 0.9 1.2 1.7 2.02.42.82.72.72.42.12.02.12.63.53.64.55.23.62.60.60.91.21.8 2.2 2.6 3.1 3.1 2.7 2.92.62.62.52.6 3.2 3.6 4.95.9 4.3 3.2 1.1 1.5 2.12.42.53.23.63.13.64.33.52.92.32.22.63.64.14.45.35.13.91.3 1.5 1.9 2.7 2.9 3.6 4.5 4.3 4.15.3 4.73.13.43.7 4.54.9 5.3 6.05.3 3.6 1.5 2.03.74.54.04.85.34.44.55.54.64.76.29.611.69.06.84.53.81.82.7 3.6 4.9 4.2 4.3 5.45.14.6 6.0 6.25.8 9.321.130.814.05.5 4.2 2.32.74.45.04.35.25.85.25.36.27.015.931.525.110.64.92.63.85.1 4.7 4.75.9 5.9 5.2 5.6 7.0 13.822.6 12.05.7 2.83.54.64.75.06.36.45.25.25.76.77.34.93.0 4.15.3 5.5 6.16.25.1 5.1 5.3 4.4 3.6 3.14.15.15.25.47.37.25.55.24.02.83.2 4.2 5.8 6.98.5 8.4 5.1 4.3 4.0 2.74.76.16.45.96.95.2 4.13.2 4.2 4.3 4.3 6.2 5.91.82.9 3.8 4.0 4.21.9 2.72.71.4 1.50.8+/- 3,357 S.F. F.F.E 41.20 THRUONLYDRIVEUP ATMDO NOT ENTERTNO PARKING FIRE LANE EB EB EB PULL BOXohohohohohohohPICK UP WINDOW PICK UPWINDOWWWW W Wwm wm wm wm wm wm wm 2" PVC PIPE IN GROUND (UNKNOWN UTILITY) TOP=37.72 NE INV=26.72 SE INV=26.92 W. INV=27.05 SANSANSANSANSANSAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN S A N EAGLE EDGE LANE(62' R/W PER ORB 9329, PG 443)STATE ROAD 434 (SANFORD - OVIEDO ROAD) (R/W WIDTH VARIES) SEA HAWK COVE (62' R/W) TRACT "D" PER PB 82, PG 63-66 wm wm wm wm wmSANSANSANSAN SAN SAN SAN ONLYLANDS OFMcDONALD'S RESTAURANTSOF FLORIDA, INC.O.R. 2803, PG. 632LANDS OFWINTER SPRINGSAPARTMENTS LPN29°03'10"E 188.49'S39°32'19"E 208.65'S50°29'56"W 174.97'N39°44'57"W 139.73'LANDS OFJDBS WINTERSPRINGS, LLC6.4' 13.2 14.7 16.3 18.1 11.5 12.8 14.3 15.8 17.6 19.5 21.6 12.4 13.8 15.4 17.1 18.9 20.9 23.0 25.1 12.1 13.5 15.0 16.6 18.4 20.3 22.3 24.3 26.4 28.3 13.1 14.6 16.3 18.1 19.9 21.8 23.8 25.7 27.6 29.3 14.1 15.9 17.7 19.7 21.6 23.5 25.3 27.1 28.8 30.2 15.2 17.2 19.2 21.3 23.3 25.2 27.0 28.5 29.8 30.9 18.4 20.6 22.8 25.0 26.9 28.6 29.9 30.9 21.8 24.2 26.5 28.5 30.1 31.2 31.8 25.4 27.7 29.8 31.3 9.3 21.1 15.9 31.5 13.8 22.6 BANK7/7/2021 149568016NEBKMAS NOTEDDD1CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS3/24/2021NEBSR 434 & TUSKAWILLAWINTER SPRINGS , FLORIDA 32708©2CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS5/10/2021NEB3BUILDING REVISION AND RECLAIM PIPE ADDITION6/25/2021NEB4SIDEWALK AND LANDSCAPE REVISIONS7/07/2021NEBC-700PHOTOMETRIC PLANNORTHCITY OF WINTER SPRINGS NOTES 1.SECURITY LIGHTS WILL BE PLACED ABOVE DOORWAYS / EXITS AND OTHER AREAS ON PERIMETER OF BUILDING. DOORWAYS / EXITS SHALL HAVE WALL MOUNTED FIXTURES. ADDITIONAL SECURITY LIGHTING SHALL BE EITHER WALL MOUNTED OR BY OTHER BUILDING ACCENT LIGHTING. FINAL DETAILS AND TYPE OF FIXTURES USED SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE FINAL ENGINEERING PLAN. ALL LIGHTING POTENTIALLY VISIBLE FROM THE STREET OR RESIDENTIAL AREA SHOULD BE INDIRECT OR INCORPORATE A FULL CUTOFF SHIELD TYPE FIXTURE. 3 177 REVISIONSNo.DATE BANK3/24/2021 149568016NEBKMAS NOTEDDD1CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS3/24/2021NEBSR 434 & TUSKAWILLAWINTER SPRINGS , FLORIDA 32708©2CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS5/10/2021NEBC-800CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS UTILITYDETAILS16" AB0VE PIPE W.S. DETAIL 6-9-00 BY DT City of Winter Springs 53 Section 9 City of Winter Springs 54 Section 9 City of Winter Springs 57 Section 9 POTABLE WATER SERVICE SINGLE 60 City of Winter Springs 65 Section 9 "DOWNSTREAM" LOT LINE AS REQUIRED "Y" BRANCH WITH SPUR 30° CURVE 6"X 4' DOUBLE WYE WITH 6" CLEAN OUT INSTALLED TO 3' ABOVE GROUND SURFACE SEWER MAIN SIZE VARIES Clean Out is to be placed at ground level after TV inspection & acceptance by the utility department. 3' MIN. GROUND LEVEL 6" MINIMUM NOTE: SEWER MAIN SIZE VARIES SERVICE CONNECTION DETAILS SHOWN IS FOR A DOUBLE PVC SERVICE A SINGLE WYE WOULD BE USED FOR A SINGLE SERVICE City of Winter Springs 62 Section 95' MAX3' MINCity of Winter Springs 61 Section 9 1 55 2 178 BANK3/24/2021 149568016NEBKMAS NOTEDDD1CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS3/24/2021NEBSR 434 & TUSKAWILLAWINTER SPRINGS , FLORIDA 32708©C-302FDOT SITE DETAILS179 MBFPLANDS OFMcDONALD'S RESTAURANTSOF FLORIDA, INC.O.R. 2803, PG. 632LANDS OFWINTER SPRINGSAPARTMENTS LPN29°03'10"E 188.49'S39°32'19"E 208.65'S50°29'56"W 174.97'N39°44'57"W 139.73'LANDS OFJDBS WINTERSPRINGS, LLC+/- 3,357 S.F. F.F.E 41.20 THRUONLYDRIVEUP ATMDO NOT ENTERTLOT 3 0.67 AC STARBUCKS 2,500 SF GASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGAS GASGASGAS NO PARKING FIRE LANE wm wm EB EB EB PULL BOXohohohohohohohPICK UP WINDOW PICK UPWINDOWWWW W Wwmwmwmwm wm wm wm wm wm wm 2" PVC PIPE IN GROUND (UNKNOWN UTILITY) TOP=37.72 NE INV=26.72 SE INV=26.92 W. INV=27.05 SANSANSANSANSANSAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN S A N EAGLE EDGE LANE(62' R/W PER ORB 9329, PG 443)STATE ROAD 434 (SANFORD - OVIEDO ROAD) (R/W WIDTH VARIES) SEA HAWK COVE (62' R/W) TRACT "D" PER PB 82, PG 63-66 SEA HAWK COVE (62' R/W) TRACT "B" PER PB 82, PG 63-66wmwmwmwmwmwmSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN SAN SAN ONLYPROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: 1.THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE. WHEN PERFORMING GRADING OPERATIONS DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING, DRAINAGE AND GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS. 2.ALL WM GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. OUTLOT AREA TO BE KEPT FREE OF JOB TRAILERS AND STORAGE AFTER THE CONTRACT MILESTONE DATE FOR THE OUTLOT. WM GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE CLEAR ACCESS FOR OUTLOT CONTRACTOR TO THE SPECIFIC PARCEL AT ALL TIMES AFTER MILESTONE DATE. PURCHASER OF OUTLOT TO PROVIDE PERMIT DOCUMENTS AND SWPPP REQUIRED BY STATE/LOCAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIFIC OUTLOT. Know what's below. before you dig.Call R BANK7/7/2021 149568016NEBKMAS NOTEDDD1CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS3/24/2021NEBSR 434 & TUSKAWILLAWINTER SPRINGS , FLORIDA 32708©2CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS5/10/2021NEB3BUILDING REVISION AND RECLAIM PIPE ADDITION6/25/2021NEB4SIDEWALK AND LANDSCAPE REVISIONS7/07/2021NEBCONCRETE PAVEMENT 1 2 C-303FIRE TRUCK TURNNORTHLEGEND CHASE BOUNDARY 2 3 3 180 BANK3/24/2021 149568016NEBKMAS NOTEDDD1CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS3/24/2021NEBSR 434 & TUSKAWILLAWINTER SPRINGS , FLORIDA 32708©2CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS5/10/2021NEBC-301SITE PLAN DETAILSN.T.S.12"’ (2" TYP.)2"R7-8P R7-8 18"X12" SIGN TYPICAL AT ALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES 12"X6" PLAQUE TYPICAL AT ALL VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES 12"X9" PENALTY SIGN WITH WORDING AS REQUIRED BY STATE OR PER LOCAL CODE GREEN LEGEND WHITE SYMBOL ON BLUE ON WHITE BACKGROUND GREEN LEGEND ON WHITE BACKGROUND ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN N.T.S. MIN. 60" ABOVE GROUND BACK OF CURB MODIFIED TYPE "D" CURB DETAIL N.T.S. 2" RADIUS 8" 6"12"6"(REFER TO PAVEMENT SECTIONS)12" NOTE: ·SEE 2018-19 FDOT STANDARD PLANS INDEX 520-001 FOR FURTHER DETAILS. N.T.S. N.T.S. 1 N.T.S. 1 1 2 181 MBFPLANDS OFMcDONALD'S RESTAURANTSOF FLORIDA, INC.O.R. 2803, PG. 632LANDS OFWINTER SPRINGSAPARTMENTS LPN29°03'10"E 188.49'S39°32'19"E 208.65'S50°29'56"W 174.97'N39°44'57"W 139.73'LANDS OFJDBS WINTERSPRINGS, LLC+/- 3,122 S.F. F.F.E 41.20 THRUONLYDRIVEUP ATMDO NOT ENTERTLOT 3 0.67 AC STARBUCKS 2,500 SF GASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGAS GASGASGAS NO PARKING FIRE LANE wm wm EB EB EB PULL BOXohohohohohohohPICK UP WINDOW PICK UPWINDOWWWW W Wwmwmwmwm wm wm wm wm wm wm 2" PVC PIPE IN GROUND (UNKNOWN UTILITY) TOP=37.72 NE INV=26.72 SE INV=26.92 W. INV=27.05 SANSANSANSANSANSAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN S A N EAGLE EDGE LANE(62' R/W PER ORB 9329, PG 443)STATE ROAD 434 (SANFORD - OVIEDO ROAD) (R/W WIDTH VARIES) SEA HAWK COVE (62' R/W) TRACT "D" PER PB 82, PG 63-66 SEA HAWK COVE (62' R/W) TRACT "B" PER PB 82, PG 63-66wmwmwmwmwmwmSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN SAN SAN ONLYPROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: 1.THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE. WHEN PERFORMING GRADING OPERATIONS DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING, DRAINAGE AND GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS. 2.ALL WM GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. OUTLOT AREA TO BE KEPT FREE OF JOB TRAILERS AND STORAGE AFTER THE CONTRACT MILESTONE DATE FOR THE OUTLOT. WM GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE CLEAR ACCESS FOR OUTLOT CONTRACTOR TO THE SPECIFIC PARCEL AT ALL TIMES AFTER MILESTONE DATE. PURCHASER OF OUTLOT TO PROVIDE PERMIT DOCUMENTS AND SWPPP REQUIRED BY STATE/LOCAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIFIC OUTLOT. Know what's below. before you dig.Call R BANK3/24/2021 149568016NEBKMAS NOTEDDD1CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS3/24/2021NEBSR 434 & TUSKAWILLAWINTER SPRINGS , FLORIDA 32708©2CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS5/10/2021NEBCONCRETE PAVEMENT 2 C-303FIRE TRUCK TURNNORTHLEGEND CHASE BOUNDARY 2 182 CO CO CO COCO CO CO CO COMBFP +/- 3,122 S.F. F.F.E 41.20 TNO PARKING FIRE LANE EB EB EB PULL BOXohohohohohohohPICK UP WINDOW PICK UPWINDOWWWW W Wwm wm wm wm wm wm wm 2" PVC PIPE IN GROUND (UNKNOWN UTILITY) TOP=37.72 NE INV=26.72 SE INV=26.92 W. INV=27.05 SANSANSANSANSANSAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN S A N EAGLE EDGE LANE(62' R/W PER ORB 9329, PG 443)STATE ROAD 434 (SANFORD - OVIEDO ROAD) (R/W WIDTH VARIES) SEA HAWK COVE (62' R/W) TRACT "D" PER PB 82, PG 63-66 wm wm wm wm wmSANSANSANSAN SAN SAN SAN ONLYLANDS OFMcDONALD'S RESTAURANTSOF FLORIDA, INC.O.R. 2803, PG. 632LANDS OFWINTER SPRINGSAPARTMENTS LPN29°03'10"E 188.49'S39°32'19"E 208.65'S50°29'56"W 174.97'N39°44'57"W 139.73'LANDS OFJDBS WINTERSPRINGS, LLCASSUMED LOCATION AND SIZE OF PROPOSED COMMUNICATIONS, FIBER OPTIC, AND ELECTRIC LINES AND CONNECTION POINT (COORDINATE WITH APPROPRIATE UTILITY PROVIDER) PROPOSED 1" PVC WATER SERVICE PROPOSED TRANSFORMER PAD PROPOSED MANUAL TRANSFER SWITCH PROPOSED ELECTRICAL CONDUIT PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT PER CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS DETAIL (4) 1" CONDUIT & (2) 1.25" CONDUIT W/ PULL WIRE FOR ATM (BY OTHERS) EXISTING CLEANOUT. PROPOSED CONNECTION TO EXISTING PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER. RIM EL.+/-39.60' & INV EL.: +/-28.75' PROPOSED COMMUNICATIONS CONDUITS. (BY OTHERS) EXISTING CAP TO BE REMOVED. CONNECTION POINT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN PROPOSED FIBER AND TELEPHONE ENTRY PROPOSED TELEPHONE CONDUIT PROPOSED FIBER OPTIC PROPOSED 5/8" WATER METER AND 3/4" BACKFLOW PREVENTER PROPOSED 10" TAP PROPOSED 10" WATERMAIN EX-SS-01 PROPOSED SANITARY CONNECTION RIM: 39.60' INV. IN 4": 28.75 SS-02 CLEAN OUT RIM: 38.93 INV. IN 4": 28.84 INV. IN 4": 28.84 INV. OUT 4": 28.84 SS-03 CLEAN OUT RIM: 42.71 INV. OUT 4": 29.04 SS-04 SANITARY DRAIN RIM: 29.85 INV. OUT 4": 29.48 PROPOSED 10" CAP PROPOSED 10"X6" TEE PROPOSED 10" GATE VALVE PROPOSED 6" GATE VALVE PROPOSED 10" TEE PROPOSED 10"X1" REDUCER Know what's below. before you dig.Call R BANK3/24/2021 149568016NEBKMAS NOTEDDD1CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS3/24/2021NEBSR 434 & TUSKAWILLAWINTER SPRINGS , FLORIDA 32708©2CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS5/10/2021NEBC-600UTILITY PLANLEGEND CHASE BOUNDARYNORTH T PROPOSED CLEANOUT PROPOSED UNDERGROUND CONDUIT PROPOSED UNDERGROUND CONDUIT PROPOSED WATER LINE PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LINE EXISTING STORM SEWER PIPE CO EXISTING GRATE INLET S EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED FIRE LINE PROPOSED TRANSFORMER PROPOSED MANUAL TRANSFER SWITCH UTILITY NOTES 1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT GRAVITY SEWER LATERALS, MANHOLES GRAVITY SEWER LINES AND DOMESTIC WATER AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL NECESSARY MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, MACHINERY, TOOLS, MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION AND LABOR NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK IN FULL AND COMPLETE ACCORDANCE WITH THE SHOWN, DESCRIBED AND REASONABLY INTENDED REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN. 2.ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS AND/OR ELEVATIONS WERE TAKEN FROM CAD LINEWORK AND PLANS PREPARED BY GEOPOINT SURVEY, INC. DATED 11/3/2019. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 3.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE LOCAL AUTHORITIES (ANY CITY) WITH REGARDS TO MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION OF THE WATER AND SEWER LINES. 4.DEFLECTION OF PIPE JOINTS AND CURVATURE OF PIPE SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. SECURELY CLOSE ALL OPEN ENDS OF PIPE AND FITTINGS WITH A WATERTIGHT PLUG WHEN WORK IS NOT IN PROGRESS. THE INTERIOR OF ALL PIPES SHALL BE CLEAN AND JOINT SURFACES WIPED CLEAN AND DRY AFTER THE PIPE HAS BEEN LOWERED INTO THE TRENCH. VALVES SHALL BE PLUMB AND LOCATED ACCORDING TO THE PLANS. 5.ALL PHASES OF INSTALLATION, INCLUDING UNLOADING, TRENCHING, LAYING AND BACK FILLING, SHALL BE DONE IN A FIRST CLASS WORKMANLIKE MANNER. ALL PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BE CAREFULLY STORED FOLLOWING MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THE COATING OR LINING IN ANY D.I. PIPE FITTINGS. ANY PIPE OR FITTING WHICH IS DAMAGED OR WHICH HAS FLAWS OR IMPERFECTIONS WHICH, IN THE OPINION OF THE ENGINEER OR OWNER, RENDERS IT UNFIT FOR USE, SHALL NOT BE USED. ANY PIPE NOT SATISFACTORY FOR USE SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKED AND IMMEDIATELY REMOVED FROM THE JOB SITE, AND SHALL BE REPLACED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 6.WATER FOR FIRE FIGHTING SHALL BE AVAILABLE FOR USE PRIOR TO COMBUSTIBLES BEING BROUGHT ON SITE. 7.ALL UTILITY AND STORM DRAIN TRENCHES LOCATED UNDER AREAS TO RECEIVE PAVING SHALL BE COMPLETELY BACK FILLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GOVERNING JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY'S SPECIFICATIONS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN. 8.UNDERGROUND LINES SHALL BE SURVEYED BY A STATE OF FLORIDA PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR BEFORE BACK FILLING. 9.CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM, AT HIS OWN EXPENSE, ANY AND ALL TESTS REQUIRED BY THE SPECIFICATIONS AND/OR ANY AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION. THESE TESTS MAY INCLUDE, BUT MAY NOT BE LIMITED TO, INFILTRATION AND EXFILTRATION, TELEVISION INSPECTION AND A MANDREL TEST ON GRAVITY SEWER. A COPY OF THE TEST RESULTS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE UTILITY PROVIDER, OWNER AND JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY AS REQUIRED. 10.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL DISTURBED VEGETATION IN KIND, UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. 11.ALL UTILITIES LOCATED OUTSIDE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAYS AND PUBLIC EASEMENTS SHALL BE PRIVATELY OWNED AND MAINTAINED 12.MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 3 FEET OF COVER OVER ALL PROPOSED WATER, WASTEWATER, AND RECLAIMED WATER LINES. 13.ALL UTILITY WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REGULATIONS AND CODES SET FORTH IN THE LATEST . NOTE: EXISTING SITE LAYOUT, UTILITY INVERTS, AND GRADE ELEVATIONS TAKEN FROM CAD LINEWORK AND PLANS PREPARED BY LEADING EDGE LAND SERVICES DATED 05/21/2020. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING EXISTING INFORMATION SHOWN PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS PUBLIC WORKS NOTES 1.ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CURRENT CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS WATER AND SEWER DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS. 2.ALL ROLL OFF CONSTRUCTION DUMPSTER'S SHALL BE FURNISHED BY WASTE PRO, PER THE CITY'S SOLID WASTE FRANCHISE AGREEMENT. 3.NO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT OPERATION BETWEEN 10 PM AND 7 AM, PER THE CITY NOISE ORDINANCE. NOISE ORDINANCE APPLIES TO SUNDAYS AND HOLIDAYS. 4. ALL SANITARY AND STORM PIPING SYSTEMS SHALL BE VIDEO INSPECTED PRIOR TO SITE ACCEPTANCE. 5. A COPY OF THE VIDEO AND REPORT ARE TO BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY FOR REVIEW. 6. NO ON-SITE BURNING IS PERMITTED WITHIN THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS. 7.A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS NOTICE IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO ALL INSPECTIONS. 8.THIS PARCEL'S SHARE OF THE ARBOR MITIGATION FEE WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. 1 1 2 183 REVISIONSNo.DATE BANK3/24/2021 149568016NEBKMAS NOTEDDD1CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS3/24/2021NEBSR 434 & TUSKAWILLAWINTER SPRINGS , FLORIDA 32708©2CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS5/10/2021NEBC-800CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS UTILITYDETAILS16" AB0VE PIPE W.S. DETAIL 6-9-00 BY DT City of Winter Springs 53 Section 9 City of Winter Springs 54 Section 9 City of Winter Springs 57 Section 9 POTABLE WATER SERVICE SINGLE 60 City of Winter Springs 65 Section 9 "DOWNSTREAM" LOT LINE AS REQUIRED "Y" BRANCH WITH SPUR 30° CURVE 6"X 4' DOUBLE WYE WITH 6" CLEAN OUT INSTALLED TO 3' ABOVE GROUND SURFACE SEWER MAIN SIZE VARIES Clean Out is to be placed at ground level after TV inspection & acceptance by the utility department. 3' MIN. GROUND LEVEL 6" MINIMUM NOTE: SEWER MAIN SIZE VARIES SERVICE CONNECTION DETAILS SHOWN IS FOR A DOUBLE PVC SERVICE A SINGLE WYE WOULD BE USED FOR A SINGLE SERVICE City of Winter Springs 62 Section 95' MAX3' MINCity of Winter Springs 61 Section 9 1 55 2 184 MBFPCO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO +/- 3,357 S.F. F.F.E 41.20 THRUONLYDRIVEUP ATMDO NOT ENTERTSOD (TYP.) SOD (TYP.) OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY LINE (TYP.) MULCH (TYP.) 37 VO 8 IN IN 9 LV 24 LV 43 TM 20 IN 8 LV 73 TM 59 DA 6 PM 18 DA 16 TM 242 104 EB LV 33 12 IN HF 6 CA 3 27 DA 524 TM 3 CA 5 PM 3 CA HF 16 TM 147 LV 31 12 IN 14 IN 79 LV HF 35 VO 27 UA 7 LIGHT POLE (TYP.) LI 1 BIKE RACKS (TYP.) LIGHT POLE (TYP.) 60 EB 5 HF SOD (TYP.) TM 60 BUFFER A: 120 LF PER SEC. 20-601 STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS CANOPY TREES @ 15' O.C. MIN REQUIRED 9 TREES @ 20' O.C. PROVIDED LV 38 LV 174 TM 319 QV 9 STATE ROAD 434 SR 434 EDGE OF PAVEMENT TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT CAL HEIGHT SPREAD TREE TYPE NATIVE LI 1 LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA ` TONTO`CRAPE MYRTLE POT 30 GAL 8 FT MIN 6 FT MIN AS SHOWN NO MULTI-STEM QV 9 QUERCUS VIRGINIANA SOUTHERN LIVE OAK FG 4" CAL MIN 12 FT MIN 8 FT MIN AS SHOWN YES UA 7 ULMUS ALATA WINGED ELM FG 3" CAL MIN 12 FT MIN 8 FT MIN AS SHOWN YES SHRUBS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT SIZE SPACING NATIVE CA 9 CRINUM ASIATICUM SPIDER LILY POT 7 GAL 48 IN MIN 24 IN MIN DA 49 DURANTA REPENS `GOLD MOUND DURANTA`GOLD MOUND DURANTA POT 3 GAL 24 IN MIN 24 IN MIN HF 62 HAMELIA PATENS FIREBUSH POT 3 GAL 24 IN MIN 24 IN MIN IN 63 ILEX VOMITORIA `NANA`DWARF YAUPON HOLLY POT 3 GAL 24 IN MIN 24 IN MIN PM 23 PODOCARPUS MACROPHYLLUS YEW PODOCARPUS POT 7 GAL 48 IN MIN 18 IN MIN VO 64 VIBURNUM ODORATISSIMUM SWEET VIBURNUM POT 7 GAL 48 IN MIN 18 IN MIN GROUND COVERS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT SIZE SPACING NATIVE EB 164 EVOLVULUS GLOMERATUS `BLUE DAZE`BRAZILIAN DWARF MORNING GLORY POT 1 GAL 6 IN MIN 6 IN MIN LV 495 LIRIOPE MUSCARI `VARIEGATA`VARIEGATED LILY TURF POT 1 GAL 12 IN MIN 12 IN MIN TM 1,371 TRACHELOSPERMUM ASIATICUM `MINIMA`MINIMA ASIAN JASMINE POT 1 GAL 6 IN MIN 6 IN MIN SOD CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT SIZE SPACING NATIVE PN 1,462 SF PASPALUM NOTATUM BAHIA GRASS SOD SOD PLANT SCHEDULE CHASE BANK TUSKAWILLA LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA CODE REQUIRED PROPOSED INTERIOR PARKING LANDSCAPING SECTION 20-324.8.F 1 TREE / LANDSCAPE ISLAND 6 ISLANDS X 1 TREE = 6 TREES 7 TREES STREETSCAPE BUFFER SECTION 20-601 27' MIN STREETSCAPE AREA FOR PROPERTIES ALONG SR 434 AND TUSKAWILLA RD CANOPY TREES SPACED AT A MIN OF 15' O.C. 9 TREES SPACED 20' O.C. TO MATCH ADJACENT PROPERTY Know what's below. before you dig.Call R BANK7/7/2021 149568016JLDKFRAS NOTEDJLDSR 434 & TUSKAWILLAWINTER SPRINGS , FLORIDA 32708©1CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS3/24/2021NEB2CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS5/10/2021NEB3BUILDING REVISION AND RECLAIM PIPE ADDITION6/25/2021NEB4SIDEWALK AND LANDSCAPE REVISIONS7/07/2021NEBNORTHNOTES: 1.ALL PLANT SPECIFICATIONS IN THE PLANT SCHEDULE SHALL BE CONSIDERED THE MINIMUM ALLOWABLE SPECIFICATIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROCURE PLANT MATERIALS AND UPSIZE AS NECESSARY TO MEET THE MOST STRINGENT SPECIFICATION. 2.LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO FIELD ADJUST ALL PLANT MATERIAL. 3.ALL QUANTITIES PROVIDED FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM ALL QUANTITIES PER PLAN PRIOR TO BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION. 4.LANDSCAPING SHALL BE PLANTED IN SUCH A MANNER AS NOT TO IMPEDE THE ACCESS FOR MAINTENANCE AND STORM-WATER RUN-OFF FLOW TO OR IN A DITCH, SWALE, OR POND. 5.ANY TREES THAT OVERHANG THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY/OR TREES WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE TRIMMED AND PRUNED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEAR HEIGHT OF 8' FROM THE FINISHED GROUND SURFACE OF THE SIDEWALK TO THE BOTTOM OF THE CANOPY AND 16'-6" CLEAR HEIGHT ABOVE THE ROADWAY. MAINTENANCE, AT A MINIMUM, SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER. 6.NEW LANDSCAPING MUST BE PROTECTED FROM VEHICULAR MOVEMENTS BY WHEEL STOPS, RAILROAD TIES, OR OTHER SUITABLE BARRIER. FOR PARKING STALLS WITHOUT WHEEL STOPS, LANDSCAPING MUST BE INSTALLED A MINIMUM OF THREE (3) FEET FROM THE BACK OF A CURB TO PREVENT DAMAGE FROM VEHICLES. L-100LANDSCAPE PLAN4 4 185 Know what's below. before you dig.Call R BANK7/7/2021 149568016JLDKFRAS NOTEDJLDSR 434 & TUSKAWILLAWINTER SPRINGS , FLORIDA 32708©1CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS3/24/2021NEB2CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS5/10/2021NEB3BUILDING REVISION AND RECLAIM PIPE ADDITION6/25/2021NEB4SIDEWALK AND LANDSCAPE REVISIONS7/07/2021NEBL-101LANDSCAPE NOTES1.SCOPE OF WORK 1.1.THE WORK CONSISTS OF: FURNISHING ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, TOOLS, TRANSPORTATION, AND ANY OTHER APPURTENANCES NECESSARY FOR THE COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. 1.2.WORK SHALL INCLUDE MAINTENANCE AND WATERING OF ALL CONTRACT PLANTING AREAS UNTIL CERTIFICATION OF ACCEPTANCE BY THE OWNER. 1.3.WORK SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH OTHER TRADES TO PREVENT CONFLICTS. 2.PROTECTION OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE ELEMENTS 2.1.PROTECT ALL EXISTING SITE ITEMS, ALREADY COMPLETED OR ESTABLISHED AND DESIGNATED TO REMAIN FROM DAMAGE BY THE CONTRACTOR UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. ALL DAMAGE RESULTING FROM THE CONTRACTOR'S WORK SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER, AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 2.2.MAINTAIN ALL NECESSARY BMP DEVICES THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 2.3.WHERE APPLICABLE, SUBMIT A DETAILED PROJECT SPECIFIC WORK ZONE TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROPRIATE REGULATORY AGENCY STANDARDS UNLESS THE WORK REQUIRES NOTHING MORE THAN A DIRECT APPLICATION OF FDOT STANDARD PLANS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION, INDEX 102-600. 2.4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL UTILITIES, WHETHER PUBLIC OR PRIVATE, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. THE INFORMATION AND DATA SHOWN WITH RESPECT TO EXISTING UTILITIES IS APPROXIMATE. THE OWNER AND DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ACCURACY AND COMPLETENESS OF ANY SUCH INFORMATION OR DATA. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR; REVIEWING AND CHECKING ALL SUCH INFORMATION AND DATA; LOCATING ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION; THE SAFETY AND PROTECTION THEREOF; REPAIRING ANY DAMAGE RESULTING FROM THE WORK. THE COST OF ALL WILL BE CONSIDERED AS HAVING BEEN INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACT PRICE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ANY AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANIES OR AGENCIES IN WRITING AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN WRITING WHEN ANY CONFLICT BETWEEN UTILITIES AND THESE PLANS EXIST PRIOR TO PLANTING. 2.5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL UNAUTHORIZED CUTTING OR DAMAGE TO PLANT MATERIAL EXISTING OR OTHERWISE. THIS SHALL INCLUDE COMPACTION AND SPILLING OF ANY DELETERIOUS MATERIALS WITHIN THE DRIP-LINE OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. PLANT MATERIAL KILLED OR DAMAGED THAT IS MISSHAPEN AND/OR UNSIGHTLY SHALL BE REPLACED WITH LIKE SIZE AND KIND TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER OR REGULATORY AGENCY AT THE COST TO THE CONTRACTOR. 2.6.SEE TREE MITIGATION PLAN AND NOTES, IF APPLICABLE. 3.SUBMITTALS 3.1.SUBMIT MATERIAL SAMPLES LISTED BELOW FOR APPROVAL, ON SITE OR AS DETERMINED BY THE OWNER. UPON APPROVAL, DELIVERY OF MATERIALS MAY COMMENCE. MATERIAL SAMPLE SIZE MULCH ONE (1) GALLON PLASTIC BAG SOIL MIXTURE ONE (1) GALLON PLASTIC BAG PLANTS ONE (1) OF EACH VARIETY (OR TAGGED IN NURSERY) 3.2.SUBMIT TESTING RESULTS OF SOIL MIXTURE AS PER SECTION 6 BELOW. 4.PLANT MATERIALS 4.1.ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL CONFORM TO THE SPECIFICATIONS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS AND SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GRADES AND STANDARDS FOR NURSERY PLANTS, LATEST EDITION, PUBLISHED BY THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FLORIDA GRADE NO. 1 OR BETTER AS DETERMINED BY THE FLORIDA DIVISION OF PLANT INDUSTRY. ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE OWNER OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. NO SUBSTITUTIONS SHALL BE MADE WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND OWNER. 4.2.ALL TREE SPECIES INSTALLED SHALL BE MATCHED IN SIZE AND SHAPE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 4.3.PLANTS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO INSPECTION AND APPROVAL AT THE PLACE OF GROWTH, UPON DELIVERY TO THE SITE, DURING PROGRESS OF THE WORK AND/OR AFTER COMPLETION. REJECTED PLANTS SHALL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED IMMEDIATELY. 5.DIGGING AND HANDLING 5.1.PROTECT ROOTS OR ROOT BALLS OF PLANTS AT ALL TIMES FROM SUN, DRYING WINDS, WATER AND FREEZING, AS NECESSARY UNTIL PLANTING. NO PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE HANDLED BY STEMS. 6.SOIL MIXTURE (PLANTING MEDIUM, PLANTING MIX, TOPSOIL MIX) 6.1.TEST EXISTING SOIL AND AMEND AS NECESSARY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GUIDELINES BELOW: 6.2.SOIL MIXTURE (PLANTING MEDIUM FOR PLANT PITS) SHALL CONSIST OF TWO PARTS OF TOPSOIL AND ONE PART SAND, AS DESCRIBED BELOW. SUBMIT SAMPLES AND PH TESTING RESULTS OF SOIL MIXTURE FOR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE APPROVAL PRIOR TO PLANT INSTALLATION OPERATIONS COMMENCE. 6.3.TOPSOIL FOR USE IN PREPARING SOIL MIXTURE FOR BACKFILLING PLANT PITS SHALL BE FERTILE, FRIABLE, AND OF A LOAMY CHARACTER; REASONABLY FREE OF SUBSOIL, CLAY LUMPS, BRUSH WEEDS AND OTHER LITTER; FREE OF ROOTS, STUMPS, STONES LARGER THAN 2" IN ANY DIRECTION, AND OTHER EXTRANEOUS OR TOXIC MATTER HARMFUL TO PLANT GROWTH. IT SHALL CONTAIN THREE (3) TO FIVE (5) PERCENT DECOMPOSED ORGANIC MATTER AND HAVE A PH BETWEEN 5.5 AND 7.0. 6.4.SAND SHALL BE COARSE, CLEAN, WELL-DRAINING, NATIVE SAND. 6.5.PLANT TREES IN THE EXISTING NATIVE SOIL ON SITE, UNLESS DETERMINED TO BE UNSUITABLE - AT WHICH POINT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE TO DISCUSS ALTERNATE RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO PLANTING. 6.6 TREES PLANTED IN TREE WELLS SHALL RECEIVE STRUCTURAL URBAN SOIL. MIX SHALL BE : 50% SAND, 20% PERLITE, 20% PINES FINES AND 10% ORGANIC SOIL. 7.WATER 7.1.PROVIDE WATER NECESSARY FOR PLANTING ESTABLISHMENT AND MAINTENANCE. WATER SHALL BE OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY TO SUSTAIN ADEQUATE PLANT GROWTH AND SHALL NOT CONTAIN HARMFUL, NATURAL OR MAN-MADE ELEMENTS DETRIMENTAL TO PLANTS. 7.2.WATERING/IRRIGATION RESTRICTIONS MAY APPLY - REFER TO PROPERTY'S JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY. 8.FERTILIZER 8.1.PROVIDE FERTILIZER APPLICATION SCHEDULE TO OWNER, AS APPLICABLE TO SOIL TYPE, PLANT INSTALLATION TYPE, AND SITE'S PROPOSED USE. SUGGESTED FERTILIZER TYPES SHALL BE ORGANIC OR OTHERWISE NATURALLY-DERIVED. 8.2.FERTILIZER RESTRICTIONS MAY APPLY - REFER TO PROPERTY'S JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY. 9.MULCH 9.1.MOISTEN MULCH MATERIAL AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION TO PREVENT WIND DISPLACEMENT, AND APPLIED AT A MINIMUM DEPTH OF THREE (3) INCHES. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR MULCH FROM WITHIN A SIX (6) INCH RADIUS AROUND TRUNK / STEM FLARE. MULCH SHALL BE "FLORIMULCH", EUCALYPTUS MULCH, OR SIMILAR SUSTAINABLY HARVESTED MULCH UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. 9.2.PROVIDE A THREE (3) INCH MINIMUM LAYER OF SPECIFIED MULCH OVER THE ENTIRE AREA OF EACH PLANTING BED AND TREE RING (SIX (6) FOOT DIAMETER MINIMUM). 10.CONTAINER GROWN STOCK 10.1.CONTAINER GROWN PLANTS SHALL HAVE BEEN GROWN IN IT'S CONTAINER SUFFICIENTLY LONG ENOUGH FOR THE NEW FIBROUS ROOTS TO HAVE DEVELOPED SO THAT THE ROOT MASS WILL RETAIN ITS SHAPE AND HOLD TOGETHER WHEN REMOVED FROM THE CONTAINER. 10.2.INSUFFICIENT OR POORLY STRUCTURED ROOT SYSTEMS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE AND WILL BE REJECTED. 10.3.ROOTS PLUS GROWER (RPG) PRODUCTS SHALL BE USED WHERE SPECIFIED. 11.MATERIALS LIST 11.1.ALL QUANTITIES ARE PROVIDED FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM ALL QUANTITIES PER PLAN PRIOR TO BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION. 12.FINE GRADING 12.1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FINE GRADING WHICH CONSISTS OF FINAL FINISHED GRADING (INCLUDING ADDITIONAL SOIL MIXTURE AS NEEDED) FOR LAWN AND PLANTING AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN ROUGH GRADED BY OTHERS. FINISH GRADE SHALL ACCOUNT FOR THICKNESS OF SOD AND/OR MULCH DEPTH. 12.2.ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE GRADED AND MAINTAINED FOR POSITIVE DRAINAGE TO SURFACE/SUBSURFACE STORM DRAIN SYSTEMS. AREAS ADJACENT TO BUILDINGS SHALL SLOPE AWAY FROM THE BUILDINGS. REFER TO CIVIL ENGINEER'S PLANS FOR FINAL GRADES, IF APPLICABLE. 13.PLANTING PROCEDURES 13.1.CLEAN WORK AND SURROUNDING AREAS OF ALL RUBBISH OR OBJECTIONABLE MATTER DAILY. REMOVE ALL MORTAR, CEMENT, AND TOXIC MATERIAL FROM THE SURFACE OF ALL PLANT BEDS. DO NOT MIX THESE MATERIALS WITH THE SOIL. SHOULD THE CONTRACTOR FIND SUCH SOIL CONDITIONS BENEATH THE SOIL WHICH WILL IN ANY WAY ADVERSELY AFFECT THE PLANT GROWTH, IMMEDIATELY CALL IT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 13.2.LOCATE, MAINTAIN AND PROTECT ALL UTILITIES ABOVE AND BELOW GROUND. CALL SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA, INC. (811) TO LOCATE UTILITIES AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 13.3.NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN WRITING IMMEDIATELY IF CONFLICT(S) EXIST WITH PROPOSED TREE LOCATIONS AND EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINES IN ACCORDANCE WITH SETBACK REQUIREMENTS OF FPL'S “RIGHT TREE, RIGHT PLACE" PROGRAM. CONSULT THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA'S “TREES AND POWER LINE” WEBSITE FOR TREE SIZE CATEGORIES. 13.4.NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN WRITING IMMEDIATELY IF CONFLICT(S) EXIST WITH PROPOSED TREE LOCATIONS AND EXISTING / PROPOSED LIGHT POLES. TREES INSTALLED IN CONFLICT WITH LIGHT POLES ARE SUBJECT TO RELOCATION AT THE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR. 13.5.REMOVE ALL EXISTING AND IMPORTED DELETERIOUS MATERIAL AND SUB-BASE FROM ALL LANDSCAPE PLANTING AREAS TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 36" OR TO NATIVE SOIL. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO BACKFILL THESE PLANTING AREAS TO ROUGH FINISHED GRADE AS NEEDED WITH CLEAN SOIL MIXTURE. 13.6.FURNISH NURSERY'S CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS. COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, COUNTY, AND LOCAL REGULATIONS GOVERNING LANDSCAPE MATERIALS AND WORK. 13.7.EXCAVATE ALL PLANTING PITS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LANDSCAPE DETAILS PROVIDED. TEST ALL TREE PITS WITH WATER BEFORE PLANTING TO ASSURE PROPER DRAINAGE PERCOLATION IS AVAILABLE. IF POOR DRAINAGE EXISTS, NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY IN WRITING. NO ALLOWANCE WILL BE MADE FOR LOST PLANTS DUE TO IMPROPER DRAINAGE. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE ELIMINATION OF ALL AIR POCKETS AROUND ROOTS. 13.8.SET TREES AND SHRUBS STRAIGHT AT AN ELEVATION THAT, AFTER SETTLEMENT, THE PLANT CROWN WILL STAND ONE (1) TO TWO (2) INCHES ABOVE GRADE. EACH PLANT SHALL BE SET IN THE CENTER OF THE PIT. PLANTING SOIL MIXTURE SHALL BE BACK FILLED, THOROUGHLY TAMPED AROUND THE BALL, AND SETTLED BY WATER (AFTER TAMPING). 13.9.DO NOT COVER TOP OF BALL WITH SOIL MIXTURE. ALL BURLAP, ROPE, WIRES, BASKETS, ETC., SHALL BE REMOVED FROM UPPER ONE THIRD (1/3) OF ROOT BALLS. 13.10.ALL SUCKER GROWTH AND BROKEN OR BADLY DAMAGED BRANCHES SHALL BE REMOVED WITH A CLEAN CUT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI A-300. 13.11.SHRUBS AND GROUND COVER PLANTS SHALL BE SPACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DRAWINGS, LANDSCAPE DETAILS AND AS INDICATED ON THE PLANT LIST. 13.12.TREE GUYING AND BRACING SHALL BE INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS TO INSURE STABILITY AND MAINTAIN TREES IN A PLUMB AND UPRIGHT POSITION. 13.13.FAILURE TO FOLLOW THE ABOVE PLANTING PROCEDURE SHALL MAKE THE CORRECTIVE MEASURES THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 14.LAWN SODDING 14.1.THE WORK CONSISTS OF LAWN BED PREPARATION, SOIL PREPARATION, AND SODDING NECESSARY TO PRODUCE A TURF GRASS LAWN ACCEPTABLE TO THE OWNER. 14.2.ALL AREAS THAT ARE TO BE SODDED SHALL BE CLEARED OF ANY ROUGH GRASS, WEEDS, AND DEBRIS TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF THREE (3) INCHES. PROVIDE ONE (1) INCH OF TOPSOIL ACROSS ENTIRE LAWN BED AND MIX THROUGHLY INTO TOP FOUR (4) INCHES OF SOIL TO BRING THE GROUND TO AN EVEN GRADE. THE ENTIRE SURFACE SHALL BE ROLLED WITH A ROLLER WEIGHING NOT MORE THAN ONE-HUNDRED (100) POUNDS PER FOOT OF WIDTH. DURING THE ROLLING, ALL DEPRESSIONS CAUSED BY SETTLEMENT SHALL BE FILLED WITH ADDITIONAL TOPSOIL AND THE SURFACE SHALL BE REGRADED AND ROLLED UNTIL PRESENTING A SMOOTH AND EVEN FINISH TO THE REQUIRED GRADE. 14.3.HAND RAKE LAWN BED UNTIL ALL BUMPS AND DEPRESSIONS ARE REMOVED. WET PREPARED AREA THOROUGHLY. 14.4.SOD ALL AREAS THAT ARE NOT PAVED OR PLANTED AS DESIGNATED ON THE DRAWINGS WITHIN THE CONTRACT LIMITS, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED OTHERWISE. 14.5.THE SOD SHALL BE CERTIFIED TO MEET FLORIDA STATE PLANT BOARD SPECIFICATIONS, ABSOLUTELY TRUE TO VARIETAL TYPE, AND FREE FROM WEEDS, FUNGUS, INSECTS AND DISEASE OF ANY KIND. 14.6.SOD PANELS SHALL BE LAID TIGHTLY TOGETHER SO AS TO MAKE A SOLID SODDED LAWN AREA. SOD SHALL BE LAID UNIFORMLY AGAINST THE EDGES OF ALL CURBS AND OTHER HARDSCAPE ELEMENTS, PAVED AND PLANTED AREAS. 14.7.IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING SOD LAYING, ROLL LAWN AREAS WITH A LAWN ROLLER AND THEN THOROUGHLY IRRIGATED. 14.8.IF, IN THE OPINION OF THE OWNER, TOP-DRESSING IS NECESSARY AFTER ROLLING TO FILL THE VOIDS BETWEEN THE SOD PANELS AND TO EVEN OUT INCONSISTENCIES IN THE SOD, CLEAN SAND, AS APPROVED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE, SHALL BE UNIFORMLY SPREAD OVER THE ENTIRE SURFACE OF THE SOD AND THOROUGHLY WATERED IN. FERTILIZE INSTALLED SOD AS ALLOWED BY PROPERTY'S JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY. 14.9.DURING DELIVERY, PRIOR TO, AND DURING THE PLANTING OF THE LAWN AREAS, THE SOD PANELS SHALL AT ALL TIMES BE PROTECTED FROM EXCESSIVE DRYING AND UNNECESSARY EXPOSURE OF THE ROOTS TO THE SUN. ALL SOD SHALL BE STACKED SO AS NOT TO BE DAMAGED BY EXCESSIVE HEAT AND MOISTURE. 14.10.WITHIN THE CONTRACT LIMITS, PRODUCE AND MAINTAIN A DENSE, WELL ESTABLISHED LAWN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REPAIR AND RE-SODDING OF ALL ERODED, SUNKEN OR BARE SPOTS UNTIL CERTIFICATION OF ACCEPTANCE BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. REPAIRED SODDING SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED AS IN THE ORIGINAL WORK (INCLUDING REGRADING IF NECESSARY). 15.CLEANUP 15.1.UPON COMPLETION OF ALL PLANTING WORK AND BEFORE FINAL ACCEPTANCE, REMOVE ALL MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, AND DEBRIS RESULTING FROM HIS WORK. ALL PAVED AREAS SHALL BE CLEANED AND THE SITE LEFT IN A NEAT AND ACCEPTABLE CONDITION AS APPROVED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 16.PLANT MATERIAL MAINTENANCE 16.1.ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY WATERING, CULTIVATING, SPRAYING, AND ALL OTHER OPERATIONS (SUCH AS RE-STAKING OR REPAIRING GUY SUPPORTS) AS NECESSARY TO INSURE HEALTHY AND VIGOROUS GROWING CONDITIONS BY THE CONTRACTOR UPON DELIVERING TO THE SITE AND UNTIL FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF WORK. 17.FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF WORK 17.1.ALL PLANT BEDS SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF NOXIOUS WEEDS UNTIL FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF WORK. PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION, TREAT ALL PLANTING BEDS WITH AN APPROVED PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDE PER MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS. (AS ALLOWED BY JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY) 17.2.PROVIDE WATERING/IRRIGATION SCHEDULE FOR ALL PLANT MATERIAL TO OWNER. OBSERVE ALL APPLICABLE WATERING RESTRICTIONS AS SET FORTH BY THE PROPERTY'S JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY. 17.3.UPON COMPLETION OF ALL WORK, A FINAL INSPECTION SHALL BE PERFORMED BY THE OWNER AND/OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. ALL PLANTING, CONSTRUCTION AND ALL OTHER INCIDENTAL WORK PERTAINING TO THIS CONTRACT SHALL BE INSPECTED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. ANY ITEMS FOUND TO NOT BE IN COMPLIANCE SHALL BE CORRECTED AT THE COST OF THE CONTRACTOR. 18.WARRANTY 18.1.THE LIFE AND SATISFACTORY CONDITION OF ALL PLANT MATERIAL INSTALLED BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE WARRANTED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) CALENDAR YEAR COMMENCING AT THE TIME OF CERTIFICATION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK BY THE OWNER AND/OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 18.2.ANY PLANT NOT FOUND IN A HEALTHY GROWING CONDITION THROUGHOUT THE WARRANTY PERIOD SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND REPLACED AS SOON AS WEATHER CONDITIONS PERMIT. ALL REPLACEMENTS SHALL BE PLANTS OF THE SAME KIND AND SIZE AS SPECIFIED IN THE PLANT LIST. THEY SHALL BE FURNISHED, PLANTED AND MULCHED AS SPECIFIED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. ANY REPLACED PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A NEW ONE (1) YEAR WARRANTY. 18.3.IN THE EVENT THE OWNER DOES NOT CONTRACT WITH THE CONTRACTOR FOR LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE, THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD VISIT THE PROJECT SITE PERIODICALLY DURING THE ONE (1) YEAR WARRANTY PERIOD TO EVALUATE MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES BEING PERFORMED BY THE OWNER. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER IN WRITING OF MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES OR CONDITIONS WHICH THREATEN VIGOROUS AND HEALTHY PLANT GROWTH. 19.ABBREVIATIONS B&B -BALLED AND BURLAPPED BR -BARE ROOT CAL - CALIPER CT -CLEAR TRUNK DBH - DIAMETER AT BREAST HEIGHT FG -FIELD GROWN FTG -FULL TO GROUND GW -GREY WOOD HO -HARDENED OFF OA -OVERALL HEIGHT RPG -ROOTS PLUS GROWER LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS 186 Know what's below. before you dig.Call R BANK7/7/2021 149568016JLDKFRAS NOTEDJLDSR 434 & TUSKAWILLAWINTER SPRINGS , FLORIDA 32708©1CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS3/24/2021NEB2CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS5/10/2021NEB3BUILDING REVISION AND RECLAIM PIPE ADDITION6/25/2021NEB4SIDEWALK AND LANDSCAPE REVISIONS7/07/2021NEB1.BASE OF TREE SHALL BE PLANTED SLIGHTLY ABOVE (1" MIN.) ADJACENT FINISH GRADE. REMOVE ALL TWINE & STRAPS & CUT BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOT BALL. NO SYNTHETIC BURLAP WILL BE ACCEPTED. 2.4" SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH OR APPROVED EQUAL. 3.DIAMETER OF TREE PIT TO BE TWICE THE DIAMETER OF ROOT BALL-ROUGHEN SIDES OF TREE PIT. 4.3" HIGH SOIL BERM TO HOLD WATER. 5.TOPSOIL MIX BACKFILL. 6.TREE WRAP. 7.4" MIN. OF TOPSOIL TO BRING TO FINISHED GRADE (SEE GRADING PLAN). 8.ROOT BALLS GREATER THAN 24" DIAMETER SHALL BE PLACED ON MOUND OF UNDISTURBED SOIL TO PREVENT SETTLING ROOT BALLS SMALLER THAN 24" IN DIA. MAY SIT ON COMPACTED EARTH. 9.UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL. 10.PREPARE PLANTING SOIL AS SPECIFIED. 11.Tree Frog® RBK40pt FOR UP TO 4" TREE CALIPER OR Tree Frog® RBK60pt FOR GREATER THAN 4" AND UP TO 6" TREE CALIPER. REFER TO SITEWORK SPECIFICATIONS FOR APPROVED MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS. PLAN SECTION NOTES: A.FINAL TREE STAKING DETAILS AND PLACEMENT TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER. B.SET TREE AT ORIGINAL DEPTH. REMOVE BURLAP, WIRE AND STRAPS (ANYTHING THAT COULD GIRDLE TREE OR RESTRICT ROOT GROWTH) ON UPPER 1/3 OF ROOTBALL. C.SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES FOR THE TYPE OF MULCH MATERIAL TO USE. D.PRUNE TREE AS DIRECTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT E.ASSURE PERCOLATION OF ALL PLANTING PITSOVERALL HEIGHT (O.H.)CLEAR TRUNK (C.T.)HEIGHT12" TYP. 1 2 3 4 5 8 9 10 117 6 TREE STAKING MULCH/ TOPSOIL BACKFILL ROOTBALL AND TRUNK MULTI-TRUNK TREE PLANTING SECTION/PLAN NTS 8 L1.50 L-102LANDSCAPE DETAILSTREE PLANTING SECTION / PLAN PLAN SECTION MULCH/TOPSOIL BACKFILL ROOTBALL AND TRUNK TREE STABILIZATION AND FERTILIZATION SYSTEM NOTES: A.FINAL TREE STAKING DETAILS AND PLACEMENT TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER. B.REMOVE BURLAP, WIRE AND STRAPS (ANYTHING THAT COULD GIRDLE TREE OR RESTRICT ROOT GROWTH) ON UPPER 1/3 OF ROOTBALL. C.PRUNE ALL TREES IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI A-300. 1 2 4 3 6 7 8 9 10 5 3X ROOTBALL WIDTH MIN.6"TRUNK/ROOT BALL TO BE CENTERED AND PLUMB/LEVEL IN PLANTING PIT. 1 6" DIA. CLEAR OF MULCH AT TRUNK FLARE.2 3" MINIMUM MULCH AS SPECIFIED. WHERE TREES ARE PLACED IN SOD, MULCH RING FOR TREES SHALL BE 6' DIAMETER (MIN.) OR AS DIRECTED BY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 3 4" HIGH BERM, FIRMLY COMPACTED.4 ANCHOR SYSTEM INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 5 FINISHED GRADE. (SEE GRADING PLAN)6 TOP OF ROOTBALL MIN. 1" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 7 PREPARED PLANTING SOIL AS SPECIFIED.8 TOP OF ROOTBALL SHALL BE 1" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. ROOTBALLS GREATER THAN 24" DIAMETER SHALL BE PLACED ON MOUND OF UNDISTURBED SOIL TO PREVENT SETTLING. ROOTBALLS SMALLER THAN 24" IN DIAMETER MAY SIT ON COMPACTED EARTH. 9 UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL.10 11 11 SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF PLANTING PIT. 1 L-102 P-CH-CBT-01 MAINTAIN 12" DEAD ZONE AT BED EDGE. REFER TO PLANT SCHEDULE FOR SPACING. BEST FACE OF SHRUB/ GROUNDCOVER TO FACE FRONT OF PLANTING BED. X X NOTES: A.CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE PERCOLATION OF ALL PLANTING PITS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. B.WHEN SHRUBS ARE PRUNED IN MASSES, PRUNE ALL SHRUBS TO ACHIEVE UNIFORM MASS / HEIGHT. C.ALL SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVERS SHALL BE PLUMB VERTICALLY, UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE.4"TYP.4" TYP. 3X ROOT BALL WIDTH MINIMUM 1 3 4 10 'X' 5 88 6 7 6 7 9 2 SHRUB/GROUNDCOVER PLANTING SECTION / PLAN NTS PLAN SECTION TOP OF SHRUB ROOTBALLS TO BE PLANTED 1" - 2" HIGH WITH SOIL MOUNDING UP TO THE TOP OF ROOTBALL. 1 PRUNE ALL SHRUBS TO ACHIEVE A UNIFORM MASS/HEIGHT. 2 3" MULCH LAYER AS SPECIFIED. 3 EXCAVATE ENTIRE BED SPECIFIED FOR GROUNDCOVER BED. 4 FINISHED GRADE (SEE GRADING PLAN). 5 PREPARED PLANTING SOIL AS SPECIFIED. (SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES) NOTE: WHEN GROUND- COVERS AND SHRUBS USED IN MASSES, ENTIRE BED TO BE AMENDED WITH PLANTING SOIL MIX AS SPECIFIED. 6 SCARIFY OF PLANTING PIT SIDES AND BOTTOM. 7 4" HIGH BERM FIRMLY COMPACTED. 8 UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL.9 FERTILIZER TABLETS (MAX 3" DEEP) 10 P-CH-CBT-03 2 L-102 NTS NOTES: A.EXCAVATE A CONTINUOUS 24" DEEP PIT (FROM TOP OF CURB / HARDSCAPE) FOR ENTIRE LENGTH AND WIDTH OF ISLAND / PLANTER AND BACKFILL WITH APPROVED PLANTING MIX. SEE GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES. B.PROTECT AND RETAIN ALL BASE MATERIAL, AND COMPACTED SUBGRADE BELOW CURBS AND HARDSCAPE FOR STRUCTURAL SUPPORT OF CURB / HARDSCAPE (TYP). C.ALL ISLANDS / PLANTERS SHALL UTILIZE POOR DRAINAGE DETAIL WHEN PERCOLATION RATES ARE 2" PER HOUR OR LESS. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR TESTING PLANTING PITS TO ENSURE ADEQUATE DRAINAGE. SEE NOTE 2 4 PLANTED PARKING LOT ISLANDS/MEDIANS SECTION ALL ISLANDS AND LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE FINE GRADED AND SLOPED TO DRAIN. REFER TO GRADING PLANS. 2 CLEAR ZONE: 36" MIN. FROM BACK OF CURB / HARDSCAPE AREA TO CENTER OF NEAREST SHRUB. CLEAR ZONE SHALL CONTAIN 3" CONTINUOUS MULCH, GROUNDCOVER, OR TURF. SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS. 3 2" MAX VERTICAL CLEARANCE, TOP OF CURB / HARDSCAPE TO TOP OF MULCH.4 24"ADJACENT HARDSCAPE, CONDITION MAY VARY 5 3 1 24" DEEP APPROVED PLANTING MIX. SEE NOTES A-C.1 3" MIN MULCH AS SPECIFIED, REFER TO GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES.5 KEEP MULCH CLEAR AT TRUNKS 3 L-102 P-CH-CBT-04 NTS NOTES: 1.CLEAR ZONE: 36" MIN. FROM BUILDING TO CENTER OF NEAREST SHRUB. 2.INSTALL SPECIFIED MULCH: 24" MIN. FROM BUILDING. SPECIFIED MULCH TO BE INSTALLED AT A DEPTH OF 3" (MIN.) PLANTINGS ADJACENT TO BUILDINGS SECTION 24" MIN. CLEAR MIN. 1/2 MATURE SHRUB WIDTH BUILDING SPECIFIED MULCH 24" WIDE MULCH BED, 3" DEEP 4 L-102 P-CH-CBT-06 NTS 2'-0" MIN. CLR. MIN. 1/2 MATURE SHRUB WIDTH 1 2 PARKING SPACE/CURB PLANTING SECTION INSTALL CONTINUOUS MULCH BED ADJACENT TO PARKING SPACES AS SHOWN. MULCH SHALL BE MIN. 3" DEEP. NO POP-UP IRRIGATION HEADS SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN 24" OF A PARKING SPACE ON ANY SIDE. 1 CURB / PARKING LOT EDGE.2 5 L-102 P-CH-CBT-07 NTS4'-0"7'-6"7'-6"7'-6" 7'-6" MIN. 1 2 MATURE SHRUB WIDTH MIN. 15' CLEAR MIN. 1 2 MATURE SHRUB WIDTH FIRE HYDRANT 1 2 3 SHRUB PLANTING AT FIRE HYDRANT SECTION / PLAN PLAN SECTION FIRE HYDRANT.1 NO PLANT EXCEEDING 12" MATURE HEIGHT MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN SHOWN RADIUS OF ALL PROPOSED OR EXISTING FIRE HYDRANTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST PLANT MATERIAL SO THAT NO CONFLICTS WITH FIRE HYDRANTS OCCUR ON SITE. 2 FRONT OF HYDRANT (TOWARD CURB) 3 6 L-102 P-CH-CBT-08 NTS +H.P. LIMITS OF PLANTING PIT NOTES: A.THIS DETAIL SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED WHERE PERCOLATION RATES ARE 2" PER HOUR OR LESS. B.CONTRACTOR TO PERFORM PERCOLATION TEST AS REQUIRED. AND NOTIFY OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. C.SEE TYPICAL TREE PLANTING DETAIL THIS SHEET FOR PLANT STAKING. 3X ROOTBALL DIAMETER VARIES1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 5 6 9 POOR DRAINAGE CONDITION SECTION / PLAN PLAN SECTION FINISH GRADE (SEE GRADING PLANS).1 BACKFILL WITH PREPARED PLANTING SOIL MIX AS SPECIFIED. 2 FILTER CLOTH, MIRAFI 500X OR BETTER.3 SLOPE BOTTOM TO DRAIN.4 AUGURED HOLE Ø ±18" PENETRATE THROUGH OCCLUDING LAYER TO WATER TABLE OR TO A DEPTH OF 7' TO ASSURE PROPER PERCOLATION. 5 BACKFILL WITH 1/2" - 3/4" GRAVEL TO REQUIRED DEPTH THROUGH OCCLUDING LAYER TO ASSURE PROPER PERCOLATION. 6 WATER TABLE. (DEPTH VARIES)7 UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL.8 SET ROOTBALL ON UNDISTURBED STABLE SUBSOIL SO THAT TOP OF ROOT BALL IS 1" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 9 ROOTBALL TRUNK 7 L-102 P-CH-CBT-09 187 +/- 3,357 S.F. F.F.E 41.20 THRUONLYDRIVEUP ATMDO NOT ENTERTMBFPCO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO MBF RSC 1" METER, BACKFLOW PREVENTER, AND FLOW SENSOR LOCATIONS SHOWN SCHEMATICALLY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY AND COORDINATE FINAL LOCATION WITH OWNER. APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF MAINLINE PIPING (TYP.) APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF PIPE SLEEVING (TYP.) DRIPLINE (TYP.) 0.50 GPM BUBBLER (TYP.) CONTROLLER AND RAIN SENSOR LOCATIONS SHOWN SCHEMATICALLY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY AND COORDINATE FINAL LOCATION WITH OWNER. OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY LINE (TYP.) LIGHT POLE (TYP.) SYMBOL DESCRIPTION QTY GPM SHRUB DRIPLINE 0.9 GPH @ 12" O.C. (3.5 L/H @ 0,3M) 5,907 S.F.88 SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION QTY PSI BUBBLER 10 34 15 FLOOD BUBBLER, 1/2" FIPT. SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION QTY BACKFLOW PREVENTER 1"1 REDUCED PRESSURE PRINCIPLE ASSEMBLY. SIZES 1/2", 3/4", 1", 1-1/4", 1-1/2", 2". CONTROLLER 1 12 STATION OUTDOOR MODULAR CONTROLLER. NO MODULE REQUIRED. HIGH-END COMMERCIAL USE. METAL PEDESTAL. RAIN SENSOR 1 BUILDING MOUNT FLOW SENSOR 1 FLOW SENSOR SOV WITH INTERFACE PANEL, 1" SCHEDULE 40 SENSOR BODY, 24 VAC, 2 AMP, INSTALL INTERFACE PANEL AS REQUIRED. IRRIGATION MAINLINE: PVC CLASS 200 SDR 21 12.1 L.F. PVC CLASS 200 IRRIGATION PIPE. PIPE SLEEVE: PVC SCHEDULE 40 113.9 L.F. TYPICAL PIPE SLEEVE FOR IRRIGATION PIPE. PIPE SLEEVE SIZE SHALL ALLOW FOR IRRIGATION PIPING AND THEIR RELATED COUPLINGS TO EASILY SLIDE THROUGH SLEEVING MATERIAL. EXTEND SLEEVES 18 INCHES BEYOND EDGES OF PAVING FOR CONSTRUCTION. 25 50 10 20 BF C RS #" # Valve Number Valve Size Valve Flow Valve Callout # IRRIGATION SCHEDULE Know what's below. before you dig.Call R BANK7/7/2021 149568016JLDKFRAS NOTEDJLDSR 434 & TUSKAWILLAWINTER SPRINGS , FLORIDA 32708©1CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS3/24/2021NEB2CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS5/10/2021NEB3BUILDING REVISION AND RECLAIM PIPE ADDITION6/25/2021NEB4SIDEWALK AND LANDSCAPE REVISIONS7/07/2021NEBNORTHI-100IRRIGATION PLAN4 4 188 Know what's below. before you dig.Call R BANK7/7/2021 149568016JLDKFRAS NOTEDJLDSR 434 & TUSKAWILLAWINTER SPRINGS , FLORIDA 32708©1CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS3/24/2021NEB2CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS5/10/2021NEB3BUILDING REVISION AND RECLAIM PIPE ADDITION6/25/2021NEB4SIDEWALK AND LANDSCAPE REVISIONS7/07/2021NEBIRRIGATION NOTESI-101 1.SCOPE OF WORK 1.1.THE WORK CONSISTS OF: FURNISHING ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, TOOLS, TRANSPORTATION, AND ANY OTHER APPURTENANCES NECESSARY FOR THE COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. 1.2.INSTALL THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO PROVIDE 100% UNIFORM COVERAGE INCLUDING ANY CHANGES MADE IN THE LAYOUT DUE TO FIELD CONDITIONS. ALL FIELD CHANGES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS. ANY SYSTEMS THAT REQUIRE FIELD ADJUSTMENT TO PROVIDE FULL AND UNIFORM COVERAGE SHALL BE MADE PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE AT THE DIRECTION OF THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. 1.3.SECURE ANY AND ALL NECESSARY PERMITS FOR THE WORK PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF OPERATIONS ON-SITE. SEND COPIES OF THE PERMIT(S) TO THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. FOR WORK LOCATED IN THE R.O.W., CONFORM TO THE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF THE AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION. 1.4.WORK SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH OTHER TRADES TO PREVENT CONFLICTS. 2.PROTECTION OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE ELEMENTS 2.1.ALL EXISTING SITE ITEMS, ALREADY COMPLETED OR ESTABLISHED AND DESIGNATED TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE BY THE CONTRACTOR UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. ALL DAMAGE RESULTING FROM THE CONTRACTOR'S WORK SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER, AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 2.2.MAINTAIN ALL NECESSARY BMP DEVICES THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 2.3.WHERE APPLICABLE, SUBMIT A DETAILED PROJECT SPECIFIC WORK ZONE TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROPRIATE REGULATORY AGENCY STANDARDS UNLESS THE WORK REQUIRES NOTHING MORE THAN A DIRECT APPLICATION OF FDOT STANDARD PLANS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION, INDEX 102-600. 2.4.LOCATE ALL UTILITIES, WHETHER PUBLIC OR PRIVATE, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. THE INFORMATION AND DATA SHOWN WITH RESPECT TO UTILITIES IS APPROXIMATE. THE OWNER AND DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ACCURACY AND COMPLETENESS OF ANY SUCH INFORMATION OR DATA. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR; REVIEWING AND CHECKING ALL SUCH INFORMATION AND DATA; LOCATING ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION; THE SAFETY AND PROTECTION THEREOF; AND REPAIRING ANY DAMAGE RESULTING FROM THE WORK. THE COST OF ALL WILL BE CONSIDERED AS HAVING BEEN INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACT PRICE. NOTIFY ANY AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANIES OR AGENCIES IN WRITING AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN WRITING WHEN ANY CONFLICT BETWEEN UTILITIES AND THESE PLANS EXIST PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 3.SUBMITTALS 3.1.SUBMIT FULL AND COMPLETE SHOP DRAWINGS OF ALL IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS TO OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 3.2.SUBMIT PRODUCT DATA SHEETS FOR ALL IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT TO BE INSTALLED TO OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM, AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS, HAS BEEN DESIGNED AND CALCULATED WITH THE EQUIPMENT AS SPECIFIED. SUBMIT ANY REQUEST FOR PRODUCT SUBSTITUTION(S) IN WRITING. IF APPROVED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY NECESSARY MODIFICATION(S) AS A RESULT OF PRODUCT SUBSTITUTIONS TO THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IN THE SHOP DRAWINGS TO MEET THE DESIGN INTENT OF THESE PLANS. 4.EQUIPMENT LIST 4.1.ALL QUANTITIES ARE PROVIDED FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY. CONFIRM ALL QUANTITIES PER PLAN PRIOR TO BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION. 5.POINT OF CONNECTION 5.1.FIELD VERIFY ALL POINT OF CONNECTION SOURCE INFORMATION INCLUDING STATIC PSI AND GPM AVAILABLE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. NOTIFY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE IN WRITING IF DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE FLOW AND PRESSURE AS LISTED IN THE CRITICAL ANALYSIS AND THE FIELD CONDITIONS EXIST. 5.2.COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF ANY METERS AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES WITH THE AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION AND OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 6.MAINLINE INSTALLATION 6.1.INSTALL ALL MAINLINES AND LATERALS UNDER PAVEMENT WITHIN SLEEVES. WHERE VALVE CONTROL LINES PASS THROUGH A SLEEVE WITH OTHER MAIN OR LATERAL LINES, CONTAIN WIRES WITHIN A SEPARATE, SMALLER CONDUIT. 6.2.INSTALL COLOR CODED METAL DETECTABLE MARKING TAPE WHICH CLEARLY NOTES: "CAUTION: IRRIGATION LINE BURIED BELOW" ABOVE THE FULL LENGTH OF THE IRRIGATION MAINLINE. 6.3.WHERE MAINLINE RUNS PARALLEL TO PAVEMENT OR CURBING, OFFSET THE MAINLINE 24" FROM THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT OR CURB. 6.4.PERFORM HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE TESTING AS FOLLOWS: 6.4.1.AFTER FLUSHING, AND THE INSTALLATION OF VALVES CONDUCT THE FOLLOWING TESTS IN THE SEQUENCE LISTED BELOW. FURNISH ALL EQUIPMENT; MATERIALS AND LABOR NECESSARY TO PERFORM THE TESTS. CONDUCT ALL TESTS IN THE PRESENCE OF THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. NOTIFY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE FORTY-EIGHT (48) HOURS IN ADVANCE OF TESTING. 6.4.2.PERFORM WATER PRESSURE TESTS ON ALL PRESSURE MAIN LINES BEFORE ANY COUPLINGS, FITTINGS, VALVES AND THE LIKE ARE CONCEALED. 6.4.3.IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO TESTING, PURGE ALL IRRIGATION LINES OF ALL ENTRAPPED AIR OR DEBRIS BY ADJUSTING CONTROL VALVES AND INSTALLING TEMPORARY CAPS FORCING WATER AND DEBRIS TO BE DISCHARGED FROM A SINGLE OUTLET. 6.4.4.TEST ALL PRESSURE MAIN LINE AT 150 PSI FOR A MINIMUM OF FOUR (4) HOURS WITH AN ALLOWABLE LOSS OF 5 PSI. PRESSURE AND GAUGES SHALL BE READ IN PSI, AND CALIBRATED SUCH THAT ACCURATE DETERMINATION OF POTENTIAL PRESSURE LOSS CAN BE ASCERTAINED. 6.4.5.RE-TEST AS REQUIRED UNTIL THE SYSTEM MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS. REPAIR ANY LEAKS, WHICH OCCUR DURING TEST PERIOD, IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE TEST. 6.4.6.PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION STATING THE WEATHER CONDITIONS, DATE, THE START TIME AND INITIAL WATER PRESSURE READINGS, THE FINISH TIME AND FINAL WATER PRESSURE READINGS AND THE TYPE OF EQUIPMENT USED TO PERFORM THE TEST. THE DOCUMENTATION MUST BE SIGNED BY A WITNESS ACCEPTABLE TO THE OWNER, VERIFYING ALL OF THE ABOVE-MENTIONED CONDITIONS. 6.4.7.SUBMIT A WRITTEN REPORT OF THE PRESSURE TESTING RESULTS WITH THE OTHER ABOVE REQUIRED INFORMATION TO THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE FOR APPROVAL. 7.IRRIGATION VALVES AND WIRING 7.1.LOCATE ALL VALVES, SPLICES WITHIN CONTROL LINES, QUICK COUPLERS, AND HOSE BIBBS WITHIN VALVE BOXES. PROVIDE PURPLE VALVE BOX LIDS FOR SYSTEMS UTILIZING A NON-POTABLE WATER SOURCE. 7.2.NUMBER THE TOP OF ALL VALVE BOX LIDS WITH MINIMUM 1" HEIGHT BLACK LETTERS TO CORRESPOND TO THE VALVE DESIGNATIONS. 7.3.WHEN POSSIBLE, LOCATE ALL VALVES IN PLANTING BEDS A MINIMUM OF 24" FROM BACK OF CURB OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7.4.SEPARATE IRRIGATION ZONES FOR HIGH AND LOW WATER USE REQUIREMENTS AND OPERATED ON DIFFERENT WATERING CYCLES. AT NO TIME SHALL MULTIPLE IRRIGATION HEAD TYPES BE LOCATED ON THE SAME VALVE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 7.5.INSTALL ALL DRIP ZONES WITH A FLUSH VALVE AND AIR RELIEF VALVE. IN THE EVENT THAT A DRIP ZONE HAS MORE THAN ONE HIGH OR LOW POINT, MORE THAN ONE AIR RELIEF VALVE OR FLUSH VALVE WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THAT ZONE. 7.6.FOLLOW MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS FOR ALL WIRING FOR CONNECTION OF THE VALVES TO THE CONTROLLER. ALL WIRE RUNS SHALL BE CONTINUOUS WITH SPLICING OCCURRING IN VALVE BOXES ONLY. WIRE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE MADE USING DBR/Y-6 CONNECTIONS OR APPROVED EQUAL. 7.7.INSTALL VALVE CONTROL WIRING IN THE SAME TRENCH AS THE MAINLINE WHERE PRACTICAL. 7.8.FOR NON TWO-WIRE SYSTEMS, RUN TWO (2) SPARE VALVE CONTROL WIRES FROM THE CONTROLLER ALONG THE ENTIRE MAINLINE TO LAST REMOTE CONTROLLED VALVE ON EACH AND EVERY LEG OF MAINLINE. 8.PIPES AND SLEEVING 8.1.DO NOT INSTALL IRRIGATION SYSTEM THROUGH PRESERVED PLANT COMMUNITIES, DRIPLINE OF EXISTING TREES, OR WITHIN WETLANDS UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED OTHERWISE. 8.2.LOCATE ALL IRRIGATION LINES WITHIN LANDSCAPED AREAS WHENEVER POSSIBLE. ALL LINES UNDER PAVEMENT MUST BE SLEEVED. 8.3.SIZE ALL PIPE SLEEVES TWO PIPE SIZES GREATER THAN THE PIPE / CUMULATIVE SUM OF THE PIPES IT CARRIES. 8.4.SLEEVES UNDER EXISTING PAVEMENT MUST BE DIRECTIONAL BORE UNLESS APPROVED BY OWNER IN WRITING. 8.5.SOLVENT CEMENTS SHALL COMPLY WITH ASTM D2564. 9.CONTROLLER AND SENSORS 9.1.COORDINATE WITH OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE FOR FINAL CONTROLLER AND RAIN SENSOR LOCATIONS. THE CONTROLLER SHALL BE PLACED IN A LOCKING CABINET APPROPRIATE FOR ITS LOCATION. (INDOOR VS. OUTDOOR USE) 9.2.LOCATE THE AUTOMATIC RAIN SENSOR SHUTOFF DEVICE IN AN AREA THAT IS UNOBSTRUCTED BY TREES, ROOF OVERHANGS, OR ANY OTHER OVERHEAD OBJECT. THE SENSOR SHALL NOT BE PLACED WITHIN THE SPRAY ZONE OF ANY SPRINKLER HEAD, INCLUDING OFF-SITE IRRIGATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE SENSOR WITHIN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE IRRIGATION CONTROLLER. 10.CLEANUP 10.1.UPON COMPLETION OF ALL WORK AND BEFORE FINAL ACCEPTANCE, REMOVE ALL MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, AND DEBRIS RESULTING FROM HIS WORK. ALL PAVED AREAS SHALL BE CLEANED AND THE SITE LEFT IN A NEAT AND ACCEPTABLE CONDITION AS APPROVED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 11.AS-BUILT IRRIGATION PLANS 11.1.PROVIDE "AS-BUILT" DRAWINGS OF THE FINAL INSTALLATION TO OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF WORK. INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING ON THE AS-BUILT DRAWINGS AT A MINIMUM: - CONTROLLER LOCATION - CONNECTION ASSEMBLY - MAINLINE ROUTING - PIPE SLEEVING - VALVE(S) - COLORIZED ZONING DIAGRAM 11.2.LOCATE ALL SLEEVES UTILIZED BY THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR WHETHER INSTALLED BY THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR OR NOT ON THE "AS-BUILT" DRAWINGS. THE DEPTH BELOW FINISH GRADE, TO THE NEAREST FOOT OF EACH END OF THE SLEEVE SHALL BE NOTED AT EACH SLEEVE LOCATION ON THE "AS-BUILT" DRAWINGS. 12.FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF WORK 12.1.MINIMIZE IRRIGATION OVERTHROW TO IMPERVIOUS AND NATURAL AREAS THROUGH FIELD ADJUSTMENTS TO INDIVIDUAL HEADS. 12.2.PROGRAM CONTROLLER TO IRRIGATE ALL ZONES WITHIN APPLICABLE WATERING WINDOWS AND PROVIDE WATERING SCHEDULE TO OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 12.3.EQUIPMENT TO BE FURNISHED TO OWNER PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE OF WORK: - TWO (2) SETS OF KEYS FOR EACH AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER. - TWO (2) 48 INCH TEE WRENCHES FOR OPERATING GATE VALVES (WHEN INSTALLED AS PART OF WORK). - THREE (3) SETS OF SPECIAL TOOLS REQUIRED FOR REMOVING, DISASSEMBLING AND ADJUSTING EACH TYPE OF - SPRINKLER AND VALVE SUPPLIED ON THIS PROJECT. - FIVE (5) EXTRA SPRINKLER HEADS, NOZZLES, SHRUB ADAPTERS, NOZZLE FILTER SCREENS, FOR EACH TYPE USED ON THE PROJECT. - TWO (2) QUICK COUPLER KEYS TO MATCH MANUFACTURER TYPE OF QUICK COUPLER. 12.4.UPON COMPLETION OF ALL WORK, A FINAL INSPECTION SHALL BE PERFORMED BY THE OWNER AND/OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM, CONSTRUCTION AND ALL OTHER INCIDENTAL WORK PERTAINING TO THIS CONTRACT SHALL BE INSPECTED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. ANY ITEMS FOUND TO NOT BE IN COMPLIANCE SHALL BE CORRECTED AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 13.WARRANTY 13.1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL WARRANTEE ALL WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF 1 YEAR FOLLOWING THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. 13.2.ANY PART OF THE IRRIGATION WORK THAT FAILS OR IS DEFECTIVE SHALL BE REPLACED OR RECONSTRUCTED AT NO COST TO THE OWNER INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: RESTORING GRADES THAT HAVE SETTLED IN TRENCHES AND EXCAVATIONS RELATED TO THE WORK. RECONSTRUCTION SHALL INCLUDE ANY PLANTINGS, SOIL, MULCH OR OTHER PARTS OF THE CONSTRUCTED LANDSCAPE THAT MAY BE DAMAGED DURING THE REPAIR OR THAT RESULTS FROM SOIL SETTLEMENT. 13.3.THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK AND START OF THE GUARANTEE PERIOD SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE OWNER, UPON THE FINDING THAT THE ENTIRE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS INSTALLED AS DESIGNED AND SPECIFIED, AND FOUND TO BE OPERATING CORRECTLY, SUPPLYING WATER EVENLY TO ALL PLANTING AND/OR LAWN AREAS. 13.4.NEITHER THE FINAL ACCEPTANCE NOR ANY PROVISION IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS SHALL RELIEVE THE CONTRACTOR OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR FAULTY MATERIALS OR WORKMANSHIP. REMEDY ANY DEFECTS WITHIN A PERIOD OF 7 DAYS (S) FROM THE DATE OF NOTIFICATION OF A DEFECT. 14.ABBREVIATIONS GPM -GALLONS PER MINUTE GPH -GALLONS PER HOUR PSI - POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH IRRIGATION SPECIFICATIONS PIPE SIZES ILLUSTRATED IN THE ABOVE CHART ARE MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE SIZES. PIPE SIZES INDICATED ON PLAN ARE FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY. FIELD SIZE ALL LATERAL PIPING TO KEEP ALL FRICTION LOSS VELOCITIES BELOW 5.0 FPS. LATERAL PIPE SIZING REQUIREMENTS MAXIMUM FLOW MINIMUM PIPE SIZE 10 GPM 16 GPM 26 GPM 35 GPM 55 GPM 80 GPM 120 GPM 3/4" 1" 1-1/4" 1-1/2" 2" 2-1/2" 3" 15.CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS NOTE 15.1 ALL PIPING, HEADS, VALVES AND BOXES SHALL BE PURPLE IN COLOR. 1 189 Know what's below. before you dig.Call R BANK7/7/2021 149568016JLDKFRAS NOTEDJLDSR 434 & TUSKAWILLAWINTER SPRINGS , FLORIDA 32708©1CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS3/24/2021NEB2CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REVIEW COMMENTS5/10/2021NEB3BUILDING REVISION AND RECLAIM PIPE ADDITION6/25/2021NEB4SIDEWALK AND LANDSCAPE REVISIONS7/07/2021NEBI-102IRRIGATION DETAILSMASTER CONTROL VALVE SECTION NTS BRICK SUPPORTS, (1 EACH SIDE - 2 TOTAL). SCHEDULE 60 NIPPLES, VALVE INLET SIZE (TYP.) MASTER CONTROL VALVE AS SPECIFIED. TURF PVC MAIN LINE. 12" WIRE CLOTH GOPHER SCREEN, WRAP UP SIDES. PVC CONDUIT FOR CONTROLLER WIRES. SET BOX 2" ABOVE GRADE AT SHRUBS. SET BOX FLUSH TO GRADE AT TURF. WATER PROOF WIRE CONNECTORS ON 30" LOOPED WIRES. NDS RECTANGULAR BOX WITH 6" EXTENSIONS AS REQUIRED.12" MIN.BELOW GRADE18" MIN. BELOW GRADE.1 I-102 FINISH GRADE CONTROL WIRE WITH IDENTIFICATION TAG NDS VALVE BOX WITH LOCKING COVER 90° ELL-PVC SCHEDULE 40 SCHEDULE 80 PVC NIPPLE MAIN LINE FITTING MAIN SUPPLY LINE 6" GRAVEL SUMP LINE BOTTOM OF VALVE PIT WITH LANDSCAPE FABRIC. MAINTAIN CLEAR SPACE BETWEEN BOTTOM OF VALVE PIT AND VALVE. DO NOT ALLOW BOX TO REST ON PIPE. TO SPRINKLERS TYPICAL CONTROL VALVE SECTION NTSI-102 2 DRIP ZONE VALVE KIT SECTION / PLAN NTS 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 2 3 15 14 7 7 14 15 16 14 FINISH GRADE/TOP OF MULCH1 VALVE BOX WITH LOCKING COVER2 REMOTE CONTROL VALVE3 30-INCH LINEAR LENGTH OF WIRE, COILED4 WATERPROOF CONNECTION5 ID TAG6 PRESSURE REGULATING QUICK CHECK BASKET FILTER7 PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE (LENGTH AS REQUIRED)8 PVC SCH 40 ELL9 PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE (2-INCH LENGTH, HIDDEN) AND PVC SCH 40 ELL 10 PVC SCH 40 TEE OR ELL11 MAINLINE PIPE12 6-INCH MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3/4-INCH WASHED GRAVEL13 PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE, CLOSE14 PVC SCH 40 ELL15 PVC SCH 40 TEE16 LATERAL PIPE17 PVC SCH 40 FEMALE ADAPTOR18 1 2 3 I-102 AIR RELIEF VALVE IN DRIPLINE SECTION NTS PVC TEE CONNECTED TO PVC HEADER PIPE BARB X MALE THREAD CONNECTOR DRIPLINE TUBING FINISH GRADE/TOP OF MULCH GRASSNDS VALVE BOX 1 2" AIR RELIEF VALVE TO BE INSTALLED AT HIGH POINTS IN DRIP ZONE 12" X 34" PVC REDUCER BUSHING BARB X FEMALE THREAD CONNECTOR BRICK (1 EACH CORNER) SUPPORT3" MINIMUM DEPTH OF 34" WASHED GRAVEL 4 I-102 TYPICAL DRAIN VALVE SECTION NTS2" MINNDS VALVE BOX PVC SCH 40 TEE LATERAL PIPE FILTERED DRAIN VALVE BRICK (1 EACH CORNER) SUPPORT 6-INCH MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3/4" WASHED GRAVEL GRASS FINISHED GRADE/TOP OF MULCH 5 I-102 NOTE: 1.DRIP TUBING TO BE ROUTED IN THE PLANT MATERIAL BED WITH AT MAXIMUM LATERAL SPACING OF 16 INCHES. 2.DRIP TUBING TO BE INSTALLED IN A GRID PATTERN. DRIP TUBING SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN A LONG CONTINUOUS RUN. 3.CONTRACTOR TO REFER TO IRRIGATION PLAN FOR LOCATION OF CONTROL VALVES THAT UTILIZE MULTIPLE DRIPLINE SUPPLY CONNECTIONS. TO NEXT DRIP SUPPLY POINT WHERE APPLICABLE FROM CONTROL VALVE WHEN DRIPLINE REQUIRES MULTIPLE SUPPLY POINTS EACH POINT SHALL BE CONNECTED UTILIZING DRIPLINE MFR FITTINGS DRIPLINE ALL DRIPLINE TUBING AND FITTING CONNECTIONS SHALL BE CLAIMED PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS TYPICAL DRIPLINE PLAN NTS AREA PERIMETER AREA PERIMETER DRIPLINE TEE I-102 9 TYPICAL BUBBLER SECTION NTS NOTE: BUBBLER SHALL NOT BE PLACED AT TRUNK FLARE. PVC SLIP-THREAD ADAPTOR. BUBBLER NOZZLE AS SPECIFIED.3" ABOVE GRADEWATER WELL AS PER PLANTER DETAIL. FINISHED GRADE.12" BELOW GRADEPVC SLIP-THREAD ADAPTER. PVC LATERAL LINE. 12" IPS FLEX HOSE WITH PVC FLEX GLUE AND PRIMER 5' LENGTH MIN. 10 I-102 TYPICAL SLEEVING SECTION NTS HARDSCAPE BASE CONCRETE CURB WHERE APPLICABLE METALLIC DISC END OF SLEEVE SHARED SLEEVE, WHERE APPLICABLE WITH LATERALS & MAINLINE ONLY ALL WIRING IS SEPARATE CONDUIT END OF SLEEVE I-102 7 10' 12" MIN 18" MIN 18" MIN 12" MIN ALL PLASTIC PIPING TO BE SNAKED IN TRENCHES AS SHOWN. TAPE AND BUNDLE WIRING AT 10 FT. INTERVALS ALL MAIN LINES TO BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS. 120 VOLT IN CONDUIT WIRING MAIN SUPPLY LATERAL MAIN SUPPLY, LATERAL, AND WIRING MAINLINE WIRING LATERAL METAL DETECTABLE MARKING TAPE TYPICAL TRENCHING SECTION NTS ALL 120 VOLT WIRING IN CONDUIT TO BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL CODE. 12" MIN12" MIN METAL DETECTABLE MARKING TAPE 11 I-102 TYPICAL THRUST BLOCK SECTION NTS INSTALLATION NOTES: 1.ALL MAIN LINE TO BE INSTALLED ACCORDING AND TESTED TO MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. 2.ALL TRENCH DEPTHS AND WIDTHS SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE TYPICAL TRENCHING DETAILS. 8 I-102 SECTION NTS 6" MIN. EAVE OF BUILDING RAIN SENSOR FEMALE ADAPTOR (SLIP X FIPT) 3/4 - INCH CLASS 200 PVC PIPE SECURE WITH APPROVED PIPE ANCHOR (1 OF 3) 45º EL (SLIP X SLIP) (1 OF 2) 90º EL (SLIP X SLIP) WIRE TO IRRIGATION CONTROLLER RAIN SENSOR - BUILDING MOUNT6 I-102 190 CITY OF WINTER SPIUNGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REQUJRED JNFORM ATION: J 126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florid:i 32708 c11s1omerscrvi~ct@wintersprin2~0.org Application - Aesthetic Review Applicant(s): Cb k-:S'" ~Avk Date: .3 /~, / rio Mailing address: [ l:Zl ~t>l1tr~'!i. P.cwk·a:i C o ( t..s.tM. bys, b lA\e 4 ~2'-{o Email: ffifHA,v,<.. it>. ,... . t&c. Lr• d.o C: c.t._,., :sc:. • '-m. Phone Number: 4 I ./ -.? 11 -l. :>. f. t../ Property Owner(s): JDBS Winter Springs, LLC Mailing Address: 14608 N Dale Mabry Highway, Tampa, FL 33618 Email: b.schultz@oceanbleugroup.com Phone Number: (813) 760-262 1 Project Name: Property Address: Parcel ID(s): Parcel Size: • I 0 ~ c.. ... c. > Existing Use: --'V ..... A__..c..._..A_a:s ..... t..__ _____________________ _ Future Land Use: ~.b..i \ ~NA k Zoning District: =ro'°°.,.) 4¥te_""" Final Engineering Approval Date: Has the applicant agreed lo a binding development agreement required by city to incorporate the terms and conditions of approval deemed necessary by the City Commission including, but not limited to, any mitigative techniques and plans required by city code? Yes..)(_ No List all witnesses that the applicant intends to present to the City Commission to provide testimony: D~Jttl.c>~ 1'1v-<<-.Ao.cw± t...?;Ll b£. w;.lec.. A"D~'S i..o;"*~vsr--1V1~1 LL c.; Describe with specificity any evidence which the applicant intends to presenl to the City Commission, including oral factual testimony, maps, photographs, records or reports and/or expert testimony: · 2019/10 rage 2 of:\ 191 CITY OF WJNTER SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT J 126 Eost State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 cus1omcrscn·ice(ci)wintersnri ng.::11 .org Application -Aesthetic Review Attach all documentary evidence which the applicant intends to present to the city commis.sion to the back of this application. The Applicant has a continuing duty to update the list of witnesses, description of evidence, and documentary evidence throughout the application process. Additional witnesses or evidence will not be admitted at the city commission hearing if not submitted at least seven (7) days prior to such hearing_ CRlTERJA FOR REVJEW: 1. The PLANS AND SPECIFJCA TrONS of the proposed project indicnte that the setting, landscaping, proportions, materials, colors, texture, scale, unity, balance, rhythm, contrast, and simplicity arc coordinated in a hannonious manner relevant to the particular proposal, surrounding area and cultural character of the community. 2. The PLANS for the proposed project are in harmony with any future development which has been formally approved by the City within the surrounding area. 3. The PLANS for t11e proposed project are not excessively similar or dissimilar to any other building, structure or sign which is either fully constructed, permitted but not fully constructed, or included on the same permit application, and facing upon the same or intersecting street within five hundred (500) feet of the proposed site, with respect to one or more of the fol lowing features of exterior design and appearance: a. Front or side elevations; b. Size and arrangement of elevation facing the street, incl ud ing reverse arrangement; or c. Other significant features of design such as, but not limited to: materials, roof Jine, hardscape improvements, and height or design elements. 4. The PLANS for the proposed project are in harmony with, or significantly enhance, the established character of other l?uildings, structures or signs in the surrounding area with respect to architectural specificafions and design features deemed significant based upon commonly acc·epted architectural principles of the local community. 5. The PROPOSED PROJECT is consistent and compatible with the intent and purpose of this article, the Comprehensive Plan for Winter Springs, design criteria adopted by the City (e.g. Town Center guidelines, SR 434 design specifications) and other applicable federal, state or local laws. 6. The PROPOSED PROJECT has incorporated significant architectural enhancements such as concrete masonry units with stucco, marbJe, termite-resistant wood, wrought iron, brick, columns and piers, porches, arches, fountains, planting areas, display windows, and other distinctive design detailing and promoting the character of the community. :?019110 192 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 Ettst State Ro11d 434 Winter Springs, Floridtt 32708 cu5tomcn;crvice(tilwint.:rsprinus0.lll'g Application -Aesthetic Review REQUIRED DOCUMENT A TlON CPDF}: A complete Application and applicable fee _Minor (Site less than 2 acres) -$300* _ Major (Site greater than 2 acres)-$600* _Modification of previously approved Aesthelic Review-$300* A Legal Description accompan ied by a certified survey or the portion of the map maintained by the Seminole County Property Appraiser ret1ecting the boundaries of the subject property (To scale). Site Plan Building Elevations (color) illustrating all sides of structures COLOR RENDERING illustrating street view with landscaping at time of planting; ILLUSTRA TJONS of all WALLS, FENCES, AND OTHER ACCESSORY STRUCTURES and indication of their height and the materials proposed for their construction; SIGNAGE ELEVATIONS of proposed exterior permanent signs, outdoor advertising or other constructed elements other than habitable space, if any; IDENTJFICATION of MATERIALS, TEXTURES, AND COLORS (include paint chips) to be used on all buildings, accessory structures, exterior signs, and other constructed elements; OTHER architectural and engineering data as may be requested to clarify the application. For all new commercial development and new residential subdivisions of ten (I 0) or more lots or existing commercial buildings being aitered by 50 percent or greater of the original floor plan or seating capacity and requiring a modified site plan, or development agreements process under section 20-28. l of the City Code, or as otherwise deemed applicable by the city to relevantly and competently examine an application for compliance with the city code and the affecl and impact the proposed use will have on neighborhood and surrounding properties, applicants shall be required to submit with the following additional information referenced in Chapter 20 -Zoning Sec.20.29 Applications (7)-( 11 ). • Fees are as shown above plus actual costs incurred for advertising or notification, and for reimbursement for technical and/or professional services which may be required in connection with the review, inspection or approval of any development (based on accounting submitted by the city's consultant), payable prior to approval of the pertinent stage of development. 2019110 Page .f of5 193 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1I26 East St:ite Rond 434 Winier Sprin~, Floridn 32708 cus10111crscrv jce/tl:·wjntersprings !1.orn Application -Aesthetic Review CJTY LIMJTED RIGHT OF ENTRY: By submitting this Application you hereby gTant temporary right of entry for City Officials to enter upon the subject property for purposes of evaluating this Application and posting on the subject property. APPLICANT'S AUTHORJZA TION: J desire to make Application for an Aesthetic Review for the aforementioned project and have read and agree to the tenns contained herein. In addition, if the Applicant is a corporate entity, the undersigned hereby represents and warrants that he/she is authorized to act on behalf of, and bind, the corporate entity. Applicant Name (Print): -.!...-IMuc:J...!..&~~~~~=----------------- Applicant Signatu~~~;;~~;:~;L~:;:~=====--Date:_..,,.~"'"'A'-'V_..S~h..:::;~_,oe-..,;;;;:2:;.,,o""'-- Business Name: _'J'..;:;_~f~.f.£.Cl!,c,..a;~.._._....:..J~u....-~~:c._----------------- Address: ---------.,.-.-------~Parcel ID~: __________ _ STA TE OF 'lt-COUNTY OF --~""""''J)/o.;;_h_'f~_· __ _ ~foregoing ift:n!J~as acknowledged before me this /3 day of ??fµefJ _CJ.,LU'I UD ~~ who is personally known to me or who as identification and who did/did not take an oath. --------Date: o/1'3/1-02fJ (seal): , I '202/J. by has produced Notary Public Signature: ---'Cll5-"~::=J.--------------~-.;. ·~·:··~~-ANELB4BAEZ · My Commission expires: • 3 202-3 f.t ·~i MYCOMMJSSIOHIGG357573 ----"'"-"'~~.._z._.._ ___ =---------fl-4~.?.:~~t:!o;.i"ii·"'bf EXPIRES:Odober 31, 2023 •1........... BondedTiruNotary~~ Nole: Tile Property Owner shall ~ig11 and have !heir signature notoriled below if the Applicant is no! the 1i\Vlll'r of the subject pruper!y. Property Owner's Name (Prin~t. ~~..,.e._ S:f!.&lJaS , l LG Property Owner Signature: ~£ .{;;;;> • Date 3 · /3-2o STATEOFfl. COUNTY OF ~___j)G;- The foregoiog instrument was acknowledged ~his 13 day of IJ1AT<.CH , 20 20 . by Jo~\!f>lf J\1 Ut.<12.lJNDp who is (pers~ to me or who has produced ____________ as identificationar1d who d1a7aid not take an oath. W!9/IO 1141\C S of:i 194 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 E:1st State Road 434 Winter Spri11gs, Florido 32708 custonierscrvicef@wintersprin!lsfl.oro. Application -Aesthetic Review ?-o d-D-ooo 1 The Com munity Development Director reserves the right to detennine whether this application is complete and accurate. An incomplete application will not be processed and will be returned to the applicant. The application shall be reviewed per Chapter 9-Aesthetic Review Sec.9-605. The sufficiency review shall be completed within thirty (30) calendar days per FL Stallle 166.033. Once the application is deemed sufficient, theapplicantshallrnovefutward witl1 the Community Workshop, required per Chapter 20-Zonin2 Sec.20-29.1. Applicants are responsible for posting notice (provided by the city) on the site at least seven (20) days prior to the City Commission {CC) meeting at which the matter will be considered. Said notice shall not be posted within the City right-of-way. All applicants shall be afforded minimal due process as required by law, including the right to receive notice, be heard, present evidence, cross-examine witnesses, and be represented by a duly aut11orized representative. Applicants are further advised that a Conditional Use is quasi-:judicial in nature. Therefore, APPLICANT ACKNOWLEDGES and AGREES, by signing below, that he or she: May be sworn-in as a witness in order to provide testimony to the City Commission; Shall be subject to cross-examination by party intervenors (if requested); and Shall be required to qualify expert witnesses, as appropriate. App licants are encouraged to familiarize themselves with Chapter 2 -Administration Sec.. 2-30 of the Winter Springs City Code relating to Quasi-Judicial Rules and Procedures ofthe City Commission. All Aesthetic Review recommendations shall be based from the required infonnation/documentation provided, the Winter Springs Code of Ordinances, and the Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan (to the extent applicable). The City Commission (CC) shall render all final decisions regarding Aesthetic Review and may impose reasonable conditions on any approved Aesthetic Review to the extent deemed necessary and relevant to ensure compliance with applicable criteria and other applicable provisions of the Winter Springs Code of Ordinances and the Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan. All fonnal decisions shall be based on competent substantial evidence and the applicable criteria as set forth in Chapter 9,Aesthetic Review Standards. Applicants are advised that if, they decide to appeal any decisions made at the meetings or hearings with respect to any matter considered at the meetings or hearings, they will need a record of the proceedings and, for such purposes, they will need to insure that a verqatim record of the proceedings is mode, at their cost, which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based, per Florida Statute 286.0 I 05. An Aesthetic Review Approval by the City Commission under this article shall be valid for a max:imum of eighteen (18) months from the date the city commission renders its approval at a public meeting. If the applicant fails to obtain a building permit within the eighteen ( 18) montb period, the city commission's approval shall expire ot the end of the period. However,.once a building pennit is issued, t11e approval shall be valid for a time period equal to the permit and shalJ expire only if lhe building permit expires. Reasonable eKtensions may be granted by the city commission upon good cause shown by the appUcant, provided subsmntial changes have not occurred in the surrounding area that would make the prior approval inconsistent with the criteria set forth in Chnoter 9-Aesthetic Revir.::w Sec.9-9603 Wl9110 "31!-C I of5 195 PROPOSED TRANSFORMERPAD AND MANUAL TRANSFERSWITCHLOT 3 0.67 ACSTARBUCKS2,500 SFNO PARKING FIRE LANEEBEBEBPULL BOXoh oh oh oh o h oh ohPICK UPWINDOWPICK UPWINDOWWWWWwmwmwmwmwmwm2" PVC PIPE INGROUND(UNKNOWN UTILITY)SAN SAN SANSANSAN SANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANEAGLE EDGE LANE(62' R/W PER ORB 932 9 , PG 4 4 3 )STATE ROAD 434(SANFORD - OVIEDO ROAD)(R/W WIDTH VARIES)SEA HAWK COVE (62' R/W) TRACT "D" PER PB 82, PG 63-66wmwmSANSANGARAGE GARAGEGARAGEGARAGEONLY TTNO PARKINGLANDS OFMcDONALD'S RESTAURANTSOF FLORIDA, INC.O.R. 2803, PG. 632LANDS OFWINTER SPRINGSAPARTMENTS LPSTATE ROAD 434N29°03'10"E 188.49'SEA HAWK COVES39°32'19"E 208.65'S50°29'56"W 174.97'N39°44'57"W 139.73'LANDS OFJDBS WINTERSPRINGS, LLCPROPOSED DUMPSTERPAD(SEE ARCH PLANS FORDETAILS)PROPOSED "STOP"SIGN TYPE R1-1 PERFDOT MUTCDPROPOSED 48" DIRECTIONARROWS AND 48" TALL X 12" WIDEPAVEMENT MARKINGS (TYP.)PROPOSED TYPE "D"CURB PER FDOTSTANDARD PLANS520-001 (TYP.)PROPOSED ATMCANOPY COVER(SEE ARCH PLANSFOR DETAILS)24.0'9.0'TYP.18.0'TYP.18.0'TYP.9.0'TYP.9.0'TYP.18.0'TYP.12.0'TYP.5.0'TYP.PROPOSED 48" DIRECTIONARROW PAVEMENTMARKINGS (TYP.)PROPOSED CURBRAMP TYPE CR-E WITHDETECTABLE WARNINGPROPOSED ADA ACCESSIBLESPACE AND SIGNPROPOSED CURB RAMP TYPE CR-BWITH DETECTABLE WARNINGPROPOSED TYPE "D"CURB PER FDOTSTANDARD PLANS520-001 (TYP.)PROPOSEDTYPE "D" CURBPER FDOTSTANDARDPLANS 520-001(TYP.)SAWCUTAND MATCHEXISTING(TYP.)SAWCUTAND MATCHEXISTING(TYP.)SAWCUT AND MATCHEXISTING (TYP.)PROPOSED "DO NOTENTER" SIGN TYPE R5-1PER FDOT MUTCDPROPOSED "DONOT ENTER" SIGNTYPE R5-1 PERFDOT MUTCDPROPOSED 24" STOP LINEPAVEMENT MARKING (TYP) AND6" DOUBLE SOLID LINE PERFDOT STANDARD PLANS711-001PROPOSED 24" STOP LINEPAVEMENT MARKING (TYP) AND6" DOUBLE SOLID LINE PERFDOT STANDARD PLANS711-001PROPOSED "STOP"SIGN TYPE R1-1 PERFDOT MUTCD17.5'24.0'8.5'7.8'6.0'28.5'24.0'R3.0'TYP.R10.0'R10.0'R10.0'R10.0'R3.0'TYP.R10.0'R97.0'R73.0'R10.0'R8.0'R10.0'R14.5'R3.0'TYP.27.0'27.3'6.0'TYP.6.0'9.0'6.4'PROPOSED 48" TALL X 12" WIDEPAVEMENT MARKINGS (TYP.)R1.0'9.0'6.0'PROPOSEDBIKE RACK (3BIKE SPACES)5.0'5.0'5.5'PROPOSED RAMPWITH HANDRAILSPER F.A.C. 505PROPOSED 6-FOOT WIDE PAVERCROSSWALK W/ 12-INCH "WHITE"STRIPE @ 36" O.C. (CONTINUOUS PAINT)6.6'5.6'RELOCATEEXISTINGBUS SIGN5.7'6.0'6.0'+/- 3,122 S.F. F.F.E 41.20 THRUONLYDRIVEUP ATM DO NOT ENTERT9 610EXTERIOR FINISH MATERIALSTHIS SCHEDULE IS COMPREHENSIVE. NOT ALL LISTED ITEMS ARE USED IN THIS PROJECTBR-1SIMULATED MASONRYMANUFACTURERACME BRICKPRODUCTBRICK VENEERCOLORWINTERSTONESIZEMODULAR, THIN BRICKNOTESRUNNING BOND MORTAR COLOR TO BE COOSA BUFF MORTARBR-2SIMULATED MASONRYMANUFACTURERCHEROKEE BRICKPRODUCTBRICK VENEERCOLORVELOUR MEDIUM GRAYSIZEMODULAR, THINK BRICKNOTESRUNNING BOND MORTAR COLOR TO BE COOSA BUFF MORTARFC-1FIBER CEMENT PANELMANUFACTURERNICHIHA FIBER CEMENTPRODUCTVINTAGEWOOD AWP 3030 AND AWP 1818COLORSPRUCE COLORSIZEVINTAGEWOOD AWP 1818 (AVAILABLE AS AWP 3030 FORNON-PROTOTYPICAL PROJECTS)NOTESINCLUDE 3.5" MANUFACTURED CORNERS AND MANUFACTURER'S"ESSENTIAL" FLASHING SYSTEM.RC-1ROOF COPINGMANUFACTURERPETERSEN ALUMINUM / PAC-CLADPRODUCTPAC-CONTINUOUSCOLORBLACK ANODIZEDACM-1ALUMINUM COMPOSITE MATERIALMANUFACTURERALCOA ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCTSPRODUCTREYNOBONDCOLORDURAGLOSS 5000 CHASE PROGRAM "CHASE SILVER"EPT-1EXTERIOR PAINTMANUFACTURERSHERWIN-WILLIAMSPRODUCTMETALATEX ACRYLIC SEMI-GLOSSCOLORSW 2840 HAMMERED SILVERFINISHSEMI-GLOSSEPT-2EXTERIOR PAINTMANUFACTURERSHERWIN-WILLIAMSPRODUCTMETALATEX ACRYLIC SEMI-GLOSSCOLORSW 7069 IRON OREFINISHSEMI-GLOSSEPT-3EXTERIOR PAINTMANUFACTURERSHERWIN-WILLIAMSBYENTITLEMENT PACKAGECOVER SHEETA00.0SR 434 And TuscawillaARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGSFURNITURE FLOOR PLAN ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE COVER SHEETBUILDING RENDERINGS LOCATION MAPSHEET INDEXBUILDING FLOOR AREA = 3,357 SFJPM Chase Retail Banking CenterSR 434 and Tuskawilla Rd.Winter Springs, Florida 32708CHASE # 38100P310145Version 20.3 (CB2020)SCOPE OF WORKPROTOTYPE - 20.2ATM CANOPY: Y, CUSTOM AFFLUENT SIGNATURE CANOPY TO MATCH BUILDINGDUMPSTER ENCLOSURE: YBRG: YSEISMIC ZONE: NCB2020 20.3 INTERIOR, FULL CUSTOM EXTERIOR WITH CUSTOM FINISHES PER CITY REQUIREMENTSA00.5DUMPSTER RENDERINGS 04-13-2021 AESTHETIC REVIEWPROJECT LOCATIONA00.1A00.0A00.2NSITEWORK AREA = 30,532 SFSITE PLANNA00.3EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A00.4EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A00.6CANOPY RENDERINGS PROJECT INFORMATION BLOCKSHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERISSUE/BYDATEDESCRIPTIONSEALTHESE DRAWINGS AND PLANS, ANY REPRODUCTION THEREOF, AND ANYCAD OR ELECTRONIC FILE OF THESE DRAWINGS AND PLANS (HEREINAFTER“PLANS”) ARE THE SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE, PROPRIETARY PROPERTY OF BDGARCHITECTS, AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED, PUBLISHED, MODIFIED ORUSED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BDGARCHITECTS. USE OF THESE PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION SHALL BECONSIDERED ACCEPTANCE OF THE TERMS CONTAINED HEREIN AND THESUITABILITY AND CONSTRUCTABILITY OF THE PLANS. THE PLANS SHALL NOTBE SCALED OR MODIFIED FOR ANY PURPOSE WITHOUT THE EXPRESSWRITTEN APPROVAL OF BDG ARCHITECTS. ANY CHANGES TO THESEPLANS, REGARDLESS OF HOW MINOR, WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTENAPPROVAL OF BDG ARCHITECTS; ANY CONSTRUCTION EXECUTED FROMTHESE PLANS WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN APPROVAL OF BDGARCHITECTS; OR ANY CHANGE IN THE SCOPE, DESIGN, OR INTENT OFTHESE PLANS FOR ANY REASON, BY ANY PERSON OTHER THAN BDGARCHITECTS SHALL AUTOMATICALLY VOID ANY DESIGN-RELATEDOBLIGATIONS BDG ARCHITECTS MAY HAVE ON THE PROJECT, AND RESULTIN THE FULL AND COMPLETE RELEASE OF BDG ARCHITECTS FROM ANYLIABILITY, CLAIMS, OR DAMAGES INCLUDING ERRORS AND OMISSIONSARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THE PLANS. ANY DISCREPANCIES ORCONFLICTS IN THE PLANS SHALL BE REFERRED IMMEDIATELY TO BDGARCHITECTS FOR CLARIFICATION PRIOR TO CONTINUING WITH THE WORK.FAILURE TO REFER DISCREPANCIES OR CONFLICTS TO BDG ARCHITECTSPRIOR TO PERFORMING WORK SHALL RESULT IN THE WAIVER OF ANYCLAIMS OR DAMAGES ASSOCIATED WITH THE DISCREPANCIES ORCONFLICTS. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COORDINATION,SCHEDULING AND CONFORMANCE OF ITS WORK AND ALL WORKPERFORMED BY SUBCONTRACTORS OR OTHER TRADES WITH THE DESIGNDOCUMENTS.JPM Chase Retail Banking Center SR 434 and Tuskawilla Rd Winter Springs, Florida 32708 SR 434 And TuscawillaJOB #:DATE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:18402004-13-2021TN400 N. Ashley Dr.Suite 600Tampa, FL 33602P: 813 - 323 - 9233FL Lic#AR-0014752www.bdgllp.combdgarchitectsPRINTED 5/25/2021 Architect of Record:Gregg A. Holdsworth, AIA, LEED APFL License # AR00176691 TN 05-25-2021 BLDG DEPT COMM05-25-2021 BLDG DEPT COMM 11111SHEET OMITTED, REVISED NUMBERING1196 2A00.42A00.41A00.41A00.334"34"MSTCR2MFDATM 2AHDCOATS5CSCRIMSCRIM5BOVERHEAD GATEELECTRICAL PANELS KEYSCASHCHESTF.D.F.D.AST1N DRT34X7230"41"30"34"MICRF.D.48"TCC2AATMMFDSOL. #7FEC60"COFFEECREDENZA75"SOLUTION #375"SOLUTION #35B 34"EAGLE EDGE LANE / PARKINGSEA HAWK COVE / ATM / ACCESSIBLE DRIVE ACCESS DRIVE / PARKING / 24VESTIBULESTATE ROAD 434BOOTH BBOOTH CBOOTH A103LOBBY104LIVING ROOM112PRINT/FILE111LOUNGE108DATA105TELLER102LAO / CASH / ATM110JANITOR120OFFICE119OFFICE122OFFICE115RESTROOM 2114RESTROOM 1113CORRIDOR101VESTIBULE123OFFICE121CONFERENCEBYFURNITURE FLOOR PLANA00.1SCALEFURNITURE FLOOR PLAN11/4"=1'-0"PROJECT INFORMATION BLOCKSHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERISSUE/BYDATEDESCRIPTIONSEALTHESE DRAWINGS AND PLANS, ANY REPRODUCTION THEREOF, AND ANYCAD OR ELECTRONIC FILE OF THESE DRAWINGS AND PLANS (HEREINAFTER“PLANS”) ARE THE SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE, PROPRIETARY PROPERTY OF BDGARCHITECTS, AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED, PUBLISHED, MODIFIED ORUSED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BDGARCHITECTS. USE OF THESE PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION SHALL BECONSIDERED ACCEPTANCE OF THE TERMS CONTAINED HEREIN AND THESUITABILITY AND CONSTRUCTABILITY OF THE PLANS. THE PLANS SHALL NOTBE SCALED OR MODIFIED FOR ANY PURPOSE WITHOUT THE EXPRESSWRITTEN APPROVAL OF BDG ARCHITECTS. ANY CHANGES TO THESEPLANS, REGARDLESS OF HOW MINOR, WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTENAPPROVAL OF BDG ARCHITECTS; ANY CONSTRUCTION EXECUTED FROMTHESE PLANS WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN APPROVAL OF BDGARCHITECTS; OR ANY CHANGE IN THE SCOPE, DESIGN, OR INTENT OFTHESE PLANS FOR ANY REASON, BY ANY PERSON OTHER THAN BDGARCHITECTS SHALL AUTOMATICALLY VOID ANY DESIGN-RELATEDOBLIGATIONS BDG ARCHITECTS MAY HAVE ON THE PROJECT, AND RESULTIN THE FULL AND COMPLETE RELEASE OF BDG ARCHITECTS FROM ANYLIABILITY, CLAIMS, OR DAMAGES INCLUDING ERRORS AND OMISSIONSARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THE PLANS. ANY DISCREPANCIES ORCONFLICTS IN THE PLANS SHALL BE REFERRED IMMEDIATELY TO BDGARCHITECTS FOR CLARIFICATION PRIOR TO CONTINUING WITH THE WORK.FAILURE TO REFER DISCREPANCIES OR CONFLICTS TO BDG ARCHITECTSPRIOR TO PERFORMING WORK SHALL RESULT IN THE WAIVER OF ANYCLAIMS OR DAMAGES ASSOCIATED WITH THE DISCREPANCIES ORCONFLICTS. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COORDINATION,SCHEDULING AND CONFORMANCE OF ITS WORK AND ALL WORKPERFORMED BY SUBCONTRACTORS OR OTHER TRADES WITH THE DESIGNDOCUMENTS.JPM Chase Retail Banking Center SR 434 and Tuskawilla Rd Winter Springs, Florida 32708 SR 434 And TuscawillaJOB #:DATE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:18402004-13-2021TN400 N. Ashley Dr.Suite 600Tampa, FL 33602P: 813 - 323 - 9233FL Lic#AR-0014752www.bdgllp.combdgarchitectsPRINTED 5/25/2021 Architect of Record:Gregg A. Holdsworth, AIA, LEED APFL License # AR00176691 TN 05-25-2021 BLDG DEPT COMM1111197 BYBUILDING RENDERINGSA00.2SCALEBUILDING RENDERINGS1NTSPROJECT INFORMATION BLOCKSHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERISSUE/BYDATEDESCRIPTIONSEALTHESE DRAWINGS AND PLANS, ANY REPRODUCTION THEREOF, AND ANYCAD OR ELECTRONIC FILE OF THESE DRAWINGS AND PLANS (HEREINAFTER“PLANS”) ARE THE SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE, PROPRIETARY PROPERTY OF BDGARCHITECTS, AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED, PUBLISHED, MODIFIED ORUSED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BDGARCHITECTS. USE OF THESE PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION SHALL BECONSIDERED ACCEPTANCE OF THE TERMS CONTAINED HEREIN AND THESUITABILITY AND CONSTRUCTABILITY OF THE PLANS. THE PLANS SHALL NOTBE SCALED OR MODIFIED FOR ANY PURPOSE WITHOUT THE EXPRESSWRITTEN APPROVAL OF BDG ARCHITECTS. ANY CHANGES TO THESEPLANS, REGARDLESS OF HOW MINOR, WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTENAPPROVAL OF BDG ARCHITECTS; ANY CONSTRUCTION EXECUTED FROMTHESE PLANS WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN APPROVAL OF BDGARCHITECTS; OR ANY CHANGE IN THE SCOPE, DESIGN, OR INTENT OFTHESE PLANS FOR ANY REASON, BY ANY PERSON OTHER THAN BDGARCHITECTS SHALL AUTOMATICALLY VOID ANY DESIGN-RELATEDOBLIGATIONS BDG ARCHITECTS MAY HAVE ON THE PROJECT, AND RESULTIN THE FULL AND COMPLETE RELEASE OF BDG ARCHITECTS FROM ANYLIABILITY, CLAIMS, OR DAMAGES INCLUDING ERRORS AND OMISSIONSARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THE PLANS. ANY DISCREPANCIES ORCONFLICTS IN THE PLANS SHALL BE REFERRED IMMEDIATELY TO BDGARCHITECTS FOR CLARIFICATION PRIOR TO CONTINUING WITH THE WORK.FAILURE TO REFER DISCREPANCIES OR CONFLICTS TO BDG ARCHITECTSPRIOR TO PERFORMING WORK SHALL RESULT IN THE WAIVER OF ANYCLAIMS OR DAMAGES ASSOCIATED WITH THE DISCREPANCIES ORCONFLICTS. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COORDINATION,SCHEDULING AND CONFORMANCE OF ITS WORK AND ALL WORKPERFORMED BY SUBCONTRACTORS OR OTHER TRADES WITH THE DESIGNDOCUMENTS.JPM Chase Retail Banking Center SR 434 and Tuskawilla Rd Winter Springs, Florida 32708 SR 434 And TuscawillaJOB #:DATE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:18402004-13-2021TN400 N. Ashley Dr.Suite 600Tampa, FL 33602P: 813 - 323 - 9233FL Lic#AR-0014752www.bdgllp.combdgarchitectsPRINTED 5/25/2021 Architect of Record:Gregg A. Holdsworth, AIA, LEED APFL License # AR00176691 TN 05-25-2021 BLDG DEPT COMM11111198 42'-5 1/2"26'-11"GLAZING9'-9 1/2"GLAZINGEXISTING GRADE300.00'8'-0" (308.00' FASL)ABOVE ADJACENT SIDEWALK3'-0" (303.00' FASL)ABOVE ADJACENT SIDEWALKMAX BUIILDING HEIGHT+ 25'-7" (325.58' FASL)PARAPET HEIGHT+ 19'-7" (319.58' FASL)77'-2"16'-7 1/2"BLANK WALL19'-6 1/2"BLANK WALLEXISTING GRADE300.00'8'-0" (308.00' FASL)ABOVE ADJACENT SIDEWALK3'-0" (303.00' FASL)ABOVE ADJACENT SIDEWALKMAX BUIILDING HEIGHT+ 25'-7" (325.58' FASL)PARAPET HEIGHT+ 19'-7" (319.58' FASL)13'-6 1/2"GLAZING16'-10"GLAZINGADDRESS9'-6" TYP.EQEQ8'-4"Lobby Hou rsMon - Sat SunDrive-up Hou rsMon - SatSun9:00 - 5 :00Closed9:00 - 5 :00Closed Lobby Hou rsMon - Sat SunDrive-up Hou rsMon - SatSun9:00 - 5 :00Closed9:00 - 5 :00ClosedTRANSPARENCY TABLEFLOORLEVELSF OF WALLWITHIN 3'-0"TO 8'-0"ZONE50% OF PRIMARYFACADETRANSPARENCYREQD WITHIN(3'-0" TO 8'-0")TRANSPARENCYPROVIDED60% OF GLAZINGWITH REQD VIEWSOF 6' INTOBUILDINGVIEWS PROVIDEDGROUNDFLOOR- WEST235 SF118 SF (50%)184 SF (78%)110 SF(60% OF THE GLAZING)184 SF(100% OF THE 60% REQD.)2ND FLOORFLOOR- WESTN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AMATERIAL BREAKDOWN TABLEMATERIALSF OF WALLPRODUCT/ COLORARCHITECTURAL BRICK342 SFACME BRICK - WINTERSTONENICHIHA FIBER CEMENT PANELS247 SFVANTAGE WOOD - SPRUCE COLORARCHITECTURAL BRICK24 SFCHEROKEE BRICK - VELOUR MEDIUMGRAYGLAZING AND STOREFRONTSYSTEM416 SFTRANSPARENT GLAZING / BLACKANODIZED MULLIONSACM48 SFREYNOBOND - CHASE SILVERCOPING28 SFBLACK ANODIZEDPREFAB CANOPY6 SFBLACK ANODIZEDPAINTN/ASW 7067 CITYSCAPETOTAL FACADE AREA1,111 SFN/AAWNING & SUN SHADE TABLELINEARFEET (LF)32'-9" LF PROVIDED (77% OF BUILDING FACADE)MATERIAL BREAKDOWN TABLEMATERIALSF OF WALLPRODUCT/ COLORARCHITECTURAL BRICK589 SFACME BRICK - WINTERSTONENICHIHA FIBER CEMENT PANELS278 SFVANTAGE WOOD - SPRUCE COLORARCHITECTURAL BRICK364 SFCHEROKEE BRICK - VELOUR MEDIUMGRAYGLAZING AND STOREFRONTSYSTEM395 SFTRANSPARENT GLAZING / BLACKANODIZED MULLIONSACM20 SFREYNOBOND - CHASE SILVERCOPING27 SFBLACK ANODIZEDPREFAB CANOPY21 SFBLACK ANODIZEDPAINTN/ASW 7067 CITYSCAPETOTAL FACADE AREA1,694 SFN/ATRANSPARENCY TABLEFLOORLEVELSF OF WALLWITHIN 3'-0"TO 8'-0"ZONE40% OF SIDEFACADETRANSPARENCYREQD WITHIN(3'-0" TO 8'-0")TRANSPARENCYPROVIDED60% OF GLAZINGWITH REQD VIEWSOF 6' INTOBUILDINGVIEWS PROVIDEDGROUNDFLOOR- NORTH385 SF154 SF (40%)152 SF (40%)91 SF(60% OF THE GLAZING)154 SF(100% OF THE 60% REQD.)2ND FLOORFLOOR- NORTHN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AAWNING & SUN SHADE TABLELINEARFEET (LF)22'-10" LF PROVIDED (30% OF BUILDING FACADE)BYEXTERIOR ELEVATIONSA00.3SCALEBUILDING ELEVATION - WEST (SIDE FACADE)11/4" = 1'-0"SCALEBUILDING ELEVATION - NORTH (PRIMARY FACADE)21/4" = 1'-0"PROJECT INFORMATION BLOCKSHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERISSUE/BYDATEDESCRIPTIONSEALTHESE DRAWINGS AND PLANS, ANY REPRODUCTION THEREOF, AND ANYCAD OR ELECTRONIC FILE OF THESE DRAWINGS AND PLANS (HEREINAFTER“PLANS”) ARE THE SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE, PROPRIETARY PROPERTY OF BDGARCHITECTS, AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED, PUBLISHED, MODIFIED ORUSED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BDGARCHITECTS. USE OF THESE PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION SHALL BECONSIDERED ACCEPTANCE OF THE TERMS CONTAINED HEREIN AND THESUITABILITY AND CONSTRUCTABILITY OF THE PLANS. THE PLANS SHALL NOTBE SCALED OR MODIFIED FOR ANY PURPOSE WITHOUT THE EXPRESSWRITTEN APPROVAL OF BDG ARCHITECTS. ANY CHANGES TO THESEPLANS, REGARDLESS OF HOW MINOR, WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTENAPPROVAL OF BDG ARCHITECTS; ANY CONSTRUCTION EXECUTED FROMTHESE PLANS WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN APPROVAL OF BDGARCHITECTS; OR ANY CHANGE IN THE SCOPE, DESIGN, OR INTENT OFTHESE PLANS FOR ANY REASON, BY ANY PERSON OTHER THAN BDGARCHITECTS SHALL AUTOMATICALLY VOID ANY DESIGN-RELATEDOBLIGATIONS BDG ARCHITECTS MAY HAVE ON THE PROJECT, AND RESULTIN THE FULL AND COMPLETE RELEASE OF BDG ARCHITECTS FROM ANYLIABILITY, CLAIMS, OR DAMAGES INCLUDING ERRORS AND OMISSIONSARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THE PLANS. ANY DISCREPANCIES ORCONFLICTS IN THE PLANS SHALL BE REFERRED IMMEDIATELY TO BDGARCHITECTS FOR CLARIFICATION PRIOR TO CONTINUING WITH THE WORK.FAILURE TO REFER DISCREPANCIES OR CONFLICTS TO BDG ARCHITECTSPRIOR TO PERFORMING WORK SHALL RESULT IN THE WAIVER OF ANYCLAIMS OR DAMAGES ASSOCIATED WITH THE DISCREPANCIES ORCONFLICTS. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COORDINATION,SCHEDULING AND CONFORMANCE OF ITS WORK AND ALL WORKPERFORMED BY SUBCONTRACTORS OR OTHER TRADES WITH THE DESIGNDOCUMENTS.JPM Chase Retail Banking Center SR 434 and Tuskawilla Rd Winter Springs, Florida 32708 SR 434 And TuscawillaJOB #:DATE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:18402004-13-2021TN400 N. Ashley Dr.Suite 600Tampa, FL 33602P: 813 - 323 - 9233FL Lic#AR-0014752www.bdgllp.combdgarchitectsPRINTED 5/25/2021 Architect of Record:Gregg A. Holdsworth, AIA, LEED APFL License # AR00176691 TN 05-25-2021 BLDG DEPT COMM11199 78'-8"9'-4 1/2"GLAZING10'-2"GLAZING13'-2"GLAZING16'-11"GLAZING19'-11 1/2"BLANK WALLEXISTING GRADE300.00'8'-0" (308.00' FASL)ABOVE ADJACENT SIDEWALK3'-0" (303.00' FASL)ABOVE ADJACENT SIDEWALKMAX BUIILDING HEIGHT+ 22'-3" (322.25' FASL)PARAPET HEIGHT+ 19'-7" (319.58' FASL)MAX BUIILDING HEIGHT+ 25'-7" (325.58' FASL)ADDRESSLobby HoursMon - Sa t SunDrive -up HoursMon - Sa tSun 9:00 - 5:00Closed9:00 - 5:00ClosedLobby HoursMon - Sa t SunDrive -up HoursMon - Sa tSun 9:00 - 5:00Closed9:00 - 5:00Closed43'-0 1/2"12'-3 1/2"BLANK WALL21'-3 1/2"BLANK WALLEXISTING GRADE300.00'8'-0" (308.00' FASL)ABOVE ADJACENT SIDEWALK3'-0" (303.00' FASL)ABOVE ADJACENT SIDEWALKMAX BUIILDING HEIGHT+ 25'-7" (325.58' FASL)PARAPET HEIGHT+ 22'-3" (322.25' FASL)3'-4"SPANDREL3'-6"GLAZING℄ OF SCUPPER9'-4"4'-0"4'-0"9'-6"TRANSPARENCY TABLEFLOORLEVELSF OF WALLWITHIN 3'-0"TO 8'-0"ZONE50% OF PRIMARYFACADETRANSPARENCYREQD WITHIN(3'-0" TO 8'-0")TRANSPARENCYPROVIDED60% OF GLAZINGWITH REQD VIEWSOF 6' INTOBUILDINGVIEWS PROVIDEDGROUNDFLOOR- SOUTH391 SF196 SF (50%)251 SF (64%)151 SF(60% OF THE GLAZING)251 SF(100% OF THE 60% REQD.)2ND FLOORFLOOR- SOUTHN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AMATERIAL BREAKDOWN TABLEMATERIALSF OF WALLPRODUCT / COLORARCHITECTURAL BRICK316 SFACME BRICK - WINTERSTONENICHIHA FIBER CEMENT PANELS68 SFVANTAGE WOOD - SPRUCE COLORARCHITECTURAL BRICK357 SFCHEROKEE BRICK - VELOUR MEDIUMGRAYGLAZING AND STOREFRONTSYSTEM587 SFTRANSPARENT GLAZING / BLACKANODIZED MULLIONSACM48 SFREYNOBOND - CHASE SILVERCOPING27 SFBLACK ANODIZEDPREFAB CANOPY21 SFBLACK ANODIZEDPAINTN/ASW 7067 CITYSCAPETOTAL FACADE AREA1,424 SFN/AAWNING & SUN SHADE TABLELINEARFEET (LF)27'-1" LF PROVIDED (34% OF BUILDING FACADE)MATERIAL BREAKDOWN TABLEMATERIALSF OF WALLPRODUCT/ COLORARCHITECTURAL BRICKN/AACME BRICK - WINTERSTONENICHIHA FIBER CEMENT PANELS164 SFVANTAGE WOOD - SPRUCE COLORARCHITECTURAL BRICK897 SFCHEROKEE BRICK - VELOUR MEDIUMGRAYSPANDREL, GLAZING ANDSTOREFRONT SYSTEM25 SFTRANSPARENT GLAZING / BLACKANODIZED MULLIONSACMN/AREYNOBOND - CHASE SILVERCOPING22 SFBLACK ANODIZEDPREFAB CANOPY6 SFBLACK ANODIZEDPAINT24 SFSW 7067 CITYSCAPETOTAL FACADE AREA1138 SFN/ATRANSPARENCY TABLEFLOORLEVELSF OF WALLWITHIN 3'-0"TO 8'-0"ZONE50% OF PRIMARYFACADETRANSPARENCYREQD WITHIN(3'-0" TO 8'-0")TRANSPARENCYPROVIDED60% OF GLAZINGWITH REQD VIEWSOF 6' INTOBUILDINGVIEWS PROVIDEDGROUNDFLOOR- EAST235 SF118 SF (50%)15 SF (6%)9 SF(60% OF THE GLAZING)15 SF(100% OF THE 60% REQD.)2ND FLOORFLOOR- EASTN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AAWNING & SUN SHADE TABLELINEARFEET (LF)N/ABYEXTERIOR ELEVATIONSA00.4SCALEBUILDING ELEVATION - SOUTH11/4" = 1'-0"SCALEBUILDING ELEVATION - EAST (SIDE FACADE)21/4" = 1'-0"PROJECT INFORMATION BLOCKSHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERISSUE/BYDATEDESCRIPTIONSEALTHESE DRAWINGS AND PLANS, ANY REPRODUCTION THEREOF, AND ANYCAD OR ELECTRONIC FILE OF THESE DRAWINGS AND PLANS (HEREINAFTER“PLANS”) ARE THE SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE, PROPRIETARY PROPERTY OF BDGARCHITECTS, AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED, PUBLISHED, MODIFIED ORUSED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BDGARCHITECTS. USE OF THESE PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION SHALL BECONSIDERED ACCEPTANCE OF THE TERMS CONTAINED HEREIN AND THESUITABILITY AND CONSTRUCTABILITY OF THE PLANS. THE PLANS SHALL NOTBE SCALED OR MODIFIED FOR ANY PURPOSE WITHOUT THE EXPRESSWRITTEN APPROVAL OF BDG ARCHITECTS. ANY CHANGES TO THESEPLANS, REGARDLESS OF HOW MINOR, WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTENAPPROVAL OF BDG ARCHITECTS; ANY CONSTRUCTION EXECUTED FROMTHESE PLANS WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN APPROVAL OF BDGARCHITECTS; OR ANY CHANGE IN THE SCOPE, DESIGN, OR INTENT OFTHESE PLANS FOR ANY REASON, BY ANY PERSON OTHER THAN BDGARCHITECTS SHALL AUTOMATICALLY VOID ANY DESIGN-RELATEDOBLIGATIONS BDG ARCHITECTS MAY HAVE ON THE PROJECT, AND RESULTIN THE FULL AND COMPLETE RELEASE OF BDG ARCHITECTS FROM ANYLIABILITY, CLAIMS, OR DAMAGES INCLUDING ERRORS AND OMISSIONSARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THE PLANS. ANY DISCREPANCIES ORCONFLICTS IN THE PLANS SHALL BE REFERRED IMMEDIATELY TO BDGARCHITECTS FOR CLARIFICATION PRIOR TO CONTINUING WITH THE WORK.FAILURE TO REFER DISCREPANCIES OR CONFLICTS TO BDG ARCHITECTSPRIOR TO PERFORMING WORK SHALL RESULT IN THE WAIVER OF ANYCLAIMS OR DAMAGES ASSOCIATED WITH THE DISCREPANCIES ORCONFLICTS. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COORDINATION,SCHEDULING AND CONFORMANCE OF ITS WORK AND ALL WORKPERFORMED BY SUBCONTRACTORS OR OTHER TRADES WITH THE DESIGNDOCUMENTS.JPM Chase Retail Banking Center SR 434 and Tuskawilla Rd Winter Springs, Florida 32708 SR 434 And TuscawillaJOB #:DATE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:18402004-13-2021TN400 N. Ashley Dr.Suite 600Tampa, FL 33602P: 813 - 323 - 9233FL Lic#AR-0014752www.bdgllp.combdgarchitectsPRINTED 5/25/2021 Architect of Record:Gregg A. Holdsworth, AIA, LEED APFL License # AR00176691 TN 05-25-2021 BLDG DEPT COMM1111200 PITCH 1/4" PER FT.ALL EXPOSED STEELCOMPONENTS SHALL BEHOT-DIPPED GALVANIZED,PRIMED AND PAINTED10'-8"3'-0"1'-6"4'-8"3'-0"2'-0"DUMPSTER BYOTHERS10'-8"12'-0"STL. ANGLE AS REQD.FOR CASTER MOUNTINGCONCRETE CURB-REFER TO SITE PLANCONCRETE SLABWHERE THE GENERALSITE PAVING IS ASPHALT,EXTEND CONCRETE SLABINTO CONTAINERROLL-OUT AREA.SEE CIVIL DRAWINGSBOLLARDS ARELOCATED IN REAR2'-0" OF ENCLOSUREBYDUMPSTER RENDERINGSA00.4SCALEDUMPSTER RENDERINGS1NTSSCALEDUMPSTER PLAN21/4" = 1'-0"PROJECT INFORMATION BLOCKSHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERISSUE/BYDATEDESCRIPTIONSEALTHESE DRAWINGS AND PLANS, ANY REPRODUCTION THEREOF, AND ANYCAD OR ELECTRONIC FILE OF THESE DRAWINGS AND PLANS (HEREINAFTER“PLANS”) ARE THE SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE, PROPRIETARY PROPERTY OF BDGARCHITECTS, AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED, PUBLISHED, MODIFIED ORUSED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BDGARCHITECTS. USE OF THESE PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION SHALL BECONSIDERED ACCEPTANCE OF THE TERMS CONTAINED HEREIN AND THESUITABILITY AND CONSTRUCTABILITY OF THE PLANS. THE PLANS SHALL NOTBE SCALED OR MODIFIED FOR ANY PURPOSE WITHOUT THE EXPRESSWRITTEN APPROVAL OF BDG ARCHITECTS. ANY CHANGES TO THESEPLANS, REGARDLESS OF HOW MINOR, WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTENAPPROVAL OF BDG ARCHITECTS; ANY CONSTRUCTION EXECUTED FROMTHESE PLANS WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN APPROVAL OF BDGARCHITECTS; OR ANY CHANGE IN THE SCOPE, DESIGN, OR INTENT OFTHESE PLANS FOR ANY REASON, BY ANY PERSON OTHER THAN BDGARCHITECTS SHALL AUTOMATICALLY VOID ANY DESIGN-RELATEDOBLIGATIONS BDG ARCHITECTS MAY HAVE ON THE PROJECT, AND RESULTIN THE FULL AND COMPLETE RELEASE OF BDG ARCHITECTS FROM ANYLIABILITY, CLAIMS, OR DAMAGES INCLUDING ERRORS AND OMISSIONSARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THE PLANS. ANY DISCREPANCIES ORCONFLICTS IN THE PLANS SHALL BE REFERRED IMMEDIATELY TO BDGARCHITECTS FOR CLARIFICATION PRIOR TO CONTINUING WITH THE WORK.FAILURE TO REFER DISCREPANCIES OR CONFLICTS TO BDG ARCHITECTSPRIOR TO PERFORMING WORK SHALL RESULT IN THE WAIVER OF ANYCLAIMS OR DAMAGES ASSOCIATED WITH THE DISCREPANCIES ORCONFLICTS. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COORDINATION,SCHEDULING AND CONFORMANCE OF ITS WORK AND ALL WORKPERFORMED BY SUBCONTRACTORS OR OTHER TRADES WITH THE DESIGNDOCUMENTS.JPM Chase Retail Banking Center SR 434 and Tuskawilla Rd Winter Springs, Florida 32708 SR 434 And TuscawillaJOB #:DATE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:18402004-13-2021TN400 N. Ashley Dr.Suite 600Tampa, FL 33602P: 813 - 323 - 9233FL Lic#AR-0014752www.bdgllp.combdgarchitectsPRINTED 5/25/2021 Architect of Record:Gregg A. Holdsworth, AIA, LEED APFL License # AR0017669N1 TN 05-25-2021 BLDG DEPT COMM111201 TRAFFIC FLOW(ATM FRONT)BYCANOPY RENDERINGSA00.6SCALECANOPY RENDERINGS1NTSSCALECANOPY PLANS2NTSNPROJECT INFORMATION BLOCKSHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERISSUE/BYDATEDESCRIPTIONSEALTHESE DRAWINGS AND PLANS, ANY REPRODUCTION THEREOF, AND ANYCAD OR ELECTRONIC FILE OF THESE DRAWINGS AND PLANS (HEREINAFTER“PLANS”) ARE THE SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE, PROPRIETARY PROPERTY OF BDGARCHITECTS, AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED, PUBLISHED, MODIFIED ORUSED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BDGARCHITECTS. USE OF THESE PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION SHALL BECONSIDERED ACCEPTANCE OF THE TERMS CONTAINED HEREIN AND THESUITABILITY AND CONSTRUCTABILITY OF THE PLANS. THE PLANS SHALL NOTBE SCALED OR MODIFIED FOR ANY PURPOSE WITHOUT THE EXPRESSWRITTEN APPROVAL OF BDG ARCHITECTS. ANY CHANGES TO THESEPLANS, REGARDLESS OF HOW MINOR, WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTENAPPROVAL OF BDG ARCHITECTS; ANY CONSTRUCTION EXECUTED FROMTHESE PLANS WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN APPROVAL OF BDGARCHITECTS; OR ANY CHANGE IN THE SCOPE, DESIGN, OR INTENT OFTHESE PLANS FOR ANY REASON, BY ANY PERSON OTHER THAN BDGARCHITECTS SHALL AUTOMATICALLY VOID ANY DESIGN-RELATEDOBLIGATIONS BDG ARCHITECTS MAY HAVE ON THE PROJECT, AND RESULTIN THE FULL AND COMPLETE RELEASE OF BDG ARCHITECTS FROM ANYLIABILITY, CLAIMS, OR DAMAGES INCLUDING ERRORS AND OMISSIONSARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THE PLANS. ANY DISCREPANCIES ORCONFLICTS IN THE PLANS SHALL BE REFERRED IMMEDIATELY TO BDGARCHITECTS FOR CLARIFICATION PRIOR TO CONTINUING WITH THE WORK.FAILURE TO REFER DISCREPANCIES OR CONFLICTS TO BDG ARCHITECTSPRIOR TO PERFORMING WORK SHALL RESULT IN THE WAIVER OF ANYCLAIMS OR DAMAGES ASSOCIATED WITH THE DISCREPANCIES ORCONFLICTS. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COORDINATION,SCHEDULING AND CONFORMANCE OF ITS WORK AND ALL WORKPERFORMED BY SUBCONTRACTORS OR OTHER TRADES WITH THE DESIGNDOCUMENTS.JPM Chase Retail Banking Center SR 434 and Tuskawilla Rd Winter Springs, Florida 32708 SR 434 And TuscawillaJOB #:DATE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:18402004-13-2021TN400 N. Ashley Dr.Suite 600Tampa, FL 33602P: 813 - 323 - 9233FL Lic#AR-0014752www.bdgllp.combdgarchitectsPRINTED 5/25/2021 Architect of Record:Gregg A. Holdsworth, AIA, LEED APFL License # AR00176691 TN 05-25-2021 BLDG DEPT COMM111202 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 customerservice@winterspringsfl.org Application – Waiver 2019/10 Page 1 of 5 The Community Development Director reserves the right to determine whether this application is complete and accurate. An incomplete application will not be processed and will be returned to the applicant. The application shall be reviewed per Chapter 20 – Zoning Sec. 20-34. The sufficiency review shall be completed within thirty (30) calendar days per FL Statue 166.033. Applicants are responsible for posting notice (provided by the city) on the site at least seven (7) days prior to the Planning & Zoning Board (PZB) meeting at which the matter will be considered. Said notice shall not be posted within the City right-of-way. All applicants shall be afforded minimal due process as required by law, including the right to receive notice, be heard, present evidence, cross-examine witnesses, and be represented by a duly authorized representative. Applicants are further advised that a Waiver is quasi-judicial in nature. Therefore, APPLICANT ACKNOWLEDGES and AGREES, by signing below, that he or she: • May be sworn-in as a witness in order to provide testimony to the City Commission; • Shall be subject to cross-examination by party intervenors (if requested); and • Shall be required to qualify expert witnesses, as appropriate. Applicants are encouraged to familiarize themselves with Chapter 2 – Administration Sec. 2-30 of the Winter Springs City Code relating to Quasi-Judicial Rules and Procedures of the City Commission. All Waiver recommendations shall be based from the required information/documentation provided, the Winter Springs Code of Ordinances, and the Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan (to the extent applicable). The City Commission (CC) shall render all final decisions regarding Waivers and may impose reasonable conditions on any approved Waiver to the extent deemed necessary and relevant to ensure compliance with applicable criteria and other applicable provisions of the Winter Springs Code of Ordinances and the Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan. All formal decisions shall be based on competent substantial evidence and the applicable criteria as set forth in Chapter 20, Zoning. Applicants are advised that if, they decide to appeal any decisions made at the meetings or hearings with respect to any matter considered at the meetings or hearings, they will need a record of the proceedings and, for such purposes, they will need to insure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, at their cost, which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based, per Florida Statute 286.0105. A Waiver which may be granted by the City Commission shall expire two (2) years after the effective date of such approval by the City Commission, unless a building permit based upon and incorporating the Waiver, is issued by the City within said time period. Upon written request of the property owner, the City Commission may extend the expiration date, without public hearing, an additional six (6) months, provided the property owner demonstrates good cause for the extension In addition, if the aforementioned building permit is timely issued, and the building permit subsequently expires and the subject development project is abandoned or discontinued for a period of six months, the Waiver shall be deemed expired and null and void, per Chapter 20 – Sec.20-36. 203 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 customerservice@winterspringsfl.org Application – Waiver 2019/10 Page 2 of 5 REQUIRED INFORMATION: Applicant(s): Date: Mailing address: Email: Phone Number: Property Owner(s): Mailing Address: Email: Phone Number: Project Name: Property Address: Parcel ID(s): Parcel Size: Existing Use: Future Land Use: Zoning District: All waiver requests shall be written in the following format: A waiver is requested from Winter Springs City Code 'X' to allow 'Y' in lieu of 'Z'. After the request, the applicant shall provide a justification for each waiver request. List Waiver(s)(provide additional sheets if necessary): Demonstrate that the applicable term or condition clearly creates an illogical, impossible, impractical, or patently unreasonable result related to the proposed property and development? 204 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 customerservice@winterspringsfl.org Application – Waiver 2019/10 Page 3 of 5 Demonstrate that the proposed development plan is in substantial compliance with Chapter 20 of the City’s Code of Ordinances and in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan? Will the proposed development plan significantly enhance the real property? Will the proposed development plan serve the public health, safety, and welfare of the City of Winter Springs? Will the waiver diminish property values in or alter the essential character of the surrounding neighborhood? Is the waiver request the minimum waiver that will eliminate or reduce the illogical, impossible, impractical, or patently unreasonable result caused by the applicable term or condition under Chapter 20 – Zoning? Is the proposed development plan compatible and harmonious with the surrounding neighborhood? 205 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 customerservice@winterspringsfl.org Application – Waiver 2019/10 Page 4 of 5 Has the applicant agreed to a binding development agreement required by city to incorporate the terms and conditions of approval deemed necessary by the City Commission including, but not limited to, any mitigative techniques and plans required by city code? Yes No List all witnesses that the applicant intends to present to the City Commission to provide testimony: Describe with specificity any evidence which the applicant intends to present to the City Commission, including oral factual testimony, maps, photographs, records or reports and/or expert testimony: Attach all documentary evidence which the applicant intends to present to the city commission to the back of this application. The Applicant has a continuing duty to update the list of witnesses, description of evidence, and documentary evidence throughout the application process. Additional witnesses or evidence will not be admitted at the city commission hearing if not submitted at least seven (7) days prior to such hearing REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION (PDF): ___ A complete Application and Fee ($500.00*) ___ A general description of the relief sought under this division ___ A brief explanation, with applicable supporting competent substantial evidence and documents, as to why the application satisfies the relevant criteria set forth in this division ___ A Legal Description accompanied by a certified survey or the portion of the map maintained by the Seminole County Property Appraiser reflecting the boundaries of the subject property (To scale). ___ An Excel mailing list with the names and addresses of each property owner within 500 ft. of each property line, along with the HOA Associations within 1/2 mile of each property line. ___ For all new commercial development and new residential subdivisions of ten (10) or more lots or existing commercial buildings being altered by 50 percent or greater of the original floor plan or seating capacity and requiring a modified site plan, or development agreements process under section 20-28.1 of the City Code, or as otherwise deemed applicable by the city to relevantly and competently examine an application for compliance with the city code and the affect and impact the proposed use will have on neighborhood and surrounding properties, applicants shall be required to submit with the following additional information referenced in Chapter 20 – Zoning Sec.20.29 Applications (7) – (11). * Fees are as shown above plus actual costs incurred for advertising or notification, and for reimbursement for technical and/or professional services which may be required in connection with the review, inspection or approval of any development (based on accounting submitted by the city’s consultant) , payable prior to approval of the pertinent stage of development. 206 207 1. Waiver: The applicant is requesting one waiver from Winter Springs City Code Sec. 20-605(b) and (d), which requires a total 27 feet of streetscape area consisting of three component parts: (1) 5-foot landscape area; (ii) 6-foot sidewalk; and (iii) 16-foot landscape and treescape area for planting canopy trees which will line the right-of-way. The waiver is to instead allow (i) 8-foot landscape and treescape area; (ii) a 6-foot sidewalk; and (iii) an 8-foot 3 inches landscape and treescape area adjacent to the right-of-way for a total of a 22-foot 3 inches area in lieu of 27- foot. Further analysis of each waiver request is listed below in the Waiver Section. Justification: The Applicant is requesting a waiver in order to provide a frontage along State Road 434 continuous with the adjacent Lot 2 of the development (Wendy’s). The Wendy’s project provides a 8’ landscape and treescape area, a 6’ sidewalk, and 8’ landscape treescape area. This project proposes 8’ of landscape and treescape area, a 6’ sidewalk; and 8’ landscape and treescape area adjacent to the right-of-way. In addition to provide a continuous frontage, the existing frontage consists of a 5’ sidewalk abutting a 2’ landscape and treescape area along SR 434. This project proposes an increase in sidewalk width from 5’ to 6’ to comply with City Code and align with the recently constructed Wendy’s sidewalk. The proposed sidewalk jogs down to tie into the existing pedestrian curb ramp and crosswalk which provides access across the shared driveway between the proposed site and the existing McDonalds. The project does not propose any modifications to this ramp as to minimize impacts to the surrounding properties and utilities abutting the existing curb ramp. 2. The adjacent Lot 2 of development (Wendy’s) was approved by the city for construction with a frontage road that parallels the existing SR434 corridor prior to the current streetscape requirement. In order to maintain a continuous frontage as well as tie into the existing pedestrian ramp the reduction of treescape/landscape area to 8’ of landscape and treescape area, 6’ sidewalk; and 8’ landscape and treescape area adjacent to the right-of-way is required. 3. The site is part of an overall master development that has previously been approved by the City which is in substantial compliance with Chapter 20 of the City’s Code of Ordinance, Comprehensive Plan, and Land Development Code. The proposed waiver requests are to provide streetscape consistent with the previously approved master site and adjacent Wendy’s development. 4. The site is part of an overall master development that has previously been permitted with the City. The proposed use is consistent with the approved master development. The development of the parcel is anticipated to bring tax revenue and enhance the real property. 5. The site is part of an overall master development that has previously been permitted with the City. The proposed use is consistent with the approved master development therefore will serve the public health, safety, and welfare of the City of Winter Springs. 6. No, the waiver requests are to reduce the streetscape requirement in order to provide continuous streetscape along the frontage road. 7. Yes, the waiver is requesting the minimum reduction in streetscape requirement in order to provide a continuous streetscape alignment along the frontage road. 208 8. The site is part of an overall master development that was previously permitted thorough the City. The proposed use is consistent with the approved master development therefore it is compatible and harmonious with it’s surroundings. 209 210 5 YEAR TREE GROWTH ALONG SR 434 211 10 YEAR TREE GROWTH ALONG SR 434 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT North of SR 434 and East of Tuscawilla Road Winter Springs, Florida PM Project Number 18-3732-0-0001 OVP No. 38100P310145 Prepared by: PM Environmental, Inc. 2131 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite 201 Hollywood, Florida 33020 Prepared for: JPMorgan Chase & Co. 10 South Dearborn, 19th Floor, Mail Code IL1-1 Chicago, Illinois 60603 226 ENVIRONMENTAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES N ATIONW IDE | WWW.PMENV.COM | 1.800.313.2966 Miami 2131 Hollywood Blvd., Suite 201 Hollywood, FL 33020 f: 877.884.6775 t: 954.924.1801 July 12, 2018 Ms. Elizabeth Seltzer JPMorgan Chase & Co. 10 South Dearborn, 19th Floor, Mail Code IL1-1710 Chicago, Illinois 60603 Re: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment of the Proposed Chase Bank Branch Located North of SR 434 and East of Tuscawilla Road in Winter Springs, Florida PM Environmental, Inc. Project No. 18-3732-0-0001 OVP No. 38100P310145 Dear Ms. Seltzer: PM Environmental, Incorporated (PM) has completed the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the above referenced property. This Phase I ESA was conducted in accordance with (1) the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries {(AAI), 40 CFR Part 312}; (2) guidelines established by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) in the Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process / Designation E 1527-13 (ASTM Standard Practice E 1527-13); and (3) JPMorgan Chase Real Estate Guidance Document. The Phase I ESA for the above referenced property represents the product of PM’s professional expertise and judgment in the environmental consulting industry, and it is reasonable for JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., ITS SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES to rely on PM’s Phase I ESA report. If you have any questions related to this report, please do not hesitate to contact our office at 800.313.2966. Sincerely, PM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Michael Green, CHMM Beth Sexton Representative for PM Environmental, Inc. National Due Diligence Manager 227 Phase I ESA of the Proposed Chase Bank Branch Located North of SR 434 and East of Tuscawilla Road, Winter Springs, Florida PM Project No. 18-3732-0-0001; July 12, 2018 PM Environmental, Inc. Executive Summary Page i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PM Environmental, Inc., (PM) was retained to conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the Proposed Chase Bank Branch located North of SR 434 and East of Tuscawilla Road, Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida (hereafter referred to as the “subject property”). This Phase I ESA was conducted in accordance with (1) the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries {(AAI), 40 CFR Part 312}; (2) guidelines established by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) in the Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process / Designation E 1527-13 (ASTM Standard Practice E 1527-13); and (3) JPMorgan Chase Real Estate Guidance Document. THE REPORT WAS PREPARED FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., ITS SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES, WHOM MAY RELY ON THE REPORT’S CONTENTS. The following table provides a brief summary of the information obtained during the completion of this investigation: Item Comments Site Reconnaissance Date & Inspector June 21, 2018 by Michael Green for PM Number of Parcels and Acreage One parcel containing 0.75 acres of a larger parent parcel (Parcel ID No. 06-21-31-506-0000-0040) Number of Buildings and Square Footage No current buildings or structures Dates of Construction and Significant Additions for Buildings No historic buildings or structures Name of Current Subject Property Occupant(s) No current occupant(s) Current Property Use/Operations Vacant wooded land Prior Property Use(s) 1940-Current: Vacant land Current Significant Hazardous Substance Use/Storage None identified during completion of this assessment Current Aboveground Storage Tanks (ASTs) None identified during completion of this assessment Current Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) None identified during completion of this assessment Summary of Environmental Database Findings No additional sites of potential concern were identified. 228 Phase I ESA of the Proposed Chase Bank Branch Located North of SR 434 and East of Tuscawilla Road, Winter Springs, Florida PM Project No. 18-3732-0-0001; July 12, 2018 PM Environmental, Inc. Executive Summary Page ii The following table summarizes the conditions identified as part of this assessment. Type of Condition Identified During the Course of this Assessment De Minimis Condition No Significant Data Gap No Historical Recognized Environmental Condition (HREC) No Controlled Recognized Environmental Condition (CREC) No Recognized Environmental Condition (REC) No Recommendations We have performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E 1527-13 of the Proposed Chase Bank Branch located North of SR 434 and East of Tuscawilla Road, Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida, the property. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 1.4 of this report. This assessment has revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions connected with the property. No further investigation is recommended. The summary presented above is general in nature and should not be considered apart from the entire text of the report, which contains the qualifications, considerations and subject property details mentioned herein. Details of findings and conclusions are elaborated upon in this report. This report has been reviewed for its completeness and accuracy. If you have any questions related to this report, please do not hesitate to contact our office at 800.313.2966. REPORT PREPARED BY: REPORT REVIEWED BY: PM Environmental, Inc. PM Environmental, Inc. Michael Green, CHMM Beth Sexton Representative for PM Environmental, Inc. National Due Diligence Manager 229 Phase I ESA of the Proposed Chase Bank Branch Located North of SR 434 and East of Tuscawilla Road, Winter Springs, Florida PM Project No. 18-3732-0-0001; July 12, 2018 PM Environmental, Inc. Table of Contents Page i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1: Purpose and Scope of Services .................................................................................... 1 1.2: Methodology .................................................................................................................. 1 1.3: Significant Assumptions ................................................................................................ 1 1.4: Limitations, Deviations, and Exceptions ........................................................................ 1 1.5: Special Terms and Conditions ....................................................................................... 2 1.6: User Reliance ................................................................................................................ 2 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................................... 2 2.1: Site Location and Legal Description .............................................................................. 2 2.2: Site and Vicinity Characteristics .................................................................................... 2 2.3: Current Use of the Property ........................................................................................... 2 2.4: Description of Structures, Roads or other Improvements on the Site ............................. 2 2.5: Current Use of Adjoining Properties .............................................................................. 3 3.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION ................................................................................ 3 3.1: Recorded Land Title Records ........................................................................................ 3 3.2: Environmental Liens and Activity and Use Limitations ................................................... 3 3.3: Specialized Knowledge ................................................................................................. 3 3.4: Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information......................................... 4 3.5: Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues .............................................................. 4 3.6: Owner, Property Manager and Occupant Information .................................................... 4 3.7: Reason for Performing Phase I ESA ............................................................................. 4 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS REVIEW ....................................................................... 4 4.1: Standard Federal and State Sources ............................................................................. 4 4.1.1: Subject Property and Occupant Listings ............................................................... 5 4.1.2: Adjoining and Nearby Sites ................................................................................... 5 4.2: Additional Environmental Sources ................................................................................. 6 4.3: Physical Setting Sources ............................................................................................... 7 4.4: Historical Use Information ............................................................................................. 8 4.4.1: Historical Maps ..................................................................................................... 8 4.4.2: Local Street Directories ........................................................................................ 9 4.4.3: Previous Environmental Reports........................................................................... 9 4.4.4: Summary of Historical Use ................................................................................... 9 4.5: Historical Use Information on Adjoining Properties ........................................................ 9 5.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE ............................................................................................10 5.1: Subject Property Observations .....................................................................................10 5.2: Non-ASTM Scope Considerations ................................................................................11 6.0 INTERVIEWS ................................................................................................................11 7.0 FINDINGS, OPINIONS AND CONCLUSIONS ...............................................................12 7.1: De Minimis Condition ...................................................................................................12 7.2: Significant Data Gaps ...................................................................................................12 7.3: Historical Recognized Environmental Conditions (HRECs) ..........................................13 7.4: Controlled Recognized Environmental Conditions (CRECs) .........................................13 7.5: Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs).............................................................13 7.6: Recommendations .......................................................................................................13 8.0 SIGNATURE(S) OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL(S) ......................................13 9.0 REFERENCES ..............................................................................................................14 230 Phase I ESA of the Proposed Chase Bank Branch Located North of SR 434 and East of Tuscawilla Road, Winter Springs, Florida PM Project No. 18-3732-0-0001; July 12, 2018 PM Environmental, Inc. Table of Contents Page ii FIGURES Figure 1: Site Location Map Figure 2: Site Plan APPENDICES Appendix A: Property Photographs from Site Reconnaissance Appendix B: Correspondence and Supporting Documentation Appendix C: Previous Site Investigations Appendix D: Regulatory Database and File Review Correspondence Appendix E: Professional Resumes Appendix F: Acronyms and Terminology, Scope of Work, ASTM Reference Document, and User’s Continuing Obligations under CERCLA 231 Phase I ESA of the Proposed Chase Bank Branch Located North of SR 434 and East of Tuscawilla Road, Winter Springs, Florida PM Project No. 18-3732-0-0001; July 12, 2018 PM Environmental, Inc. Page 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1: Purpose and Scope of Services The purpose of this Phase I ESA was to evaluate the current and historical conditions of the subject property in an effort to identify recognized environmental conditions (RECs), controlled recognized environmental conditions (CRECs), and historical recognized environmental conditions (HRECs) in connection with the subject property. This Phase I ESA is intended to reduce, but not eliminate, uncertainty regarding the potential for RECs, CRECs, and HRECs in connection with the subject property. Acronyms and terms used in this report are described in Appendix F. Additionally, PM’s scope of services is included in Appendix F. 1.2: Methodology This Phase I ESA was conducted in accordance with (1) the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries {(AAI), 40 CFR Part 312}; (2) guidelines established by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) in the Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process / Designation E 1527-13 (ASTM Standard Practice E 1527-13); and (3) JPMorgan Chase Real Estate Guidance Document. 1.3: Significant Assumptions Pursuant to ASTM Standard Practice E 1527-13, PM assumes that the information provided by all sources and parties, including the User, is accurate and complete, except where obvious inconsistencies or inaccuracies were identified. 1.4: Limitations, Deviations, and Exceptions There are no deviations from the ASTM Standard. Non-ASTM Scope considerations are included in Section 5.2. Any physical limitations identified during the completion of this report are referenced in Section 5.0. Due to changing environmental regulatory conditions and potential on-site or adjacent activities occurring after this assessment, the client may not presume the continuing applicability to the subject property of the conclusions in this assessment for more than 180 days after the report’s issuance date, per ASTM Standard Practice E 1527-13. PM Environmental, Inc. has no present or contemplated future ownership interest or financial interest in the real estate that is the subject of this Environmental Assessment Report; and Consultant has no personal interest with respect to the subject matter of the Environmental Assessment Report of the parties involved and consultant has no relationship with the property or the owners thereof which would prevent an independent analysis of the environmental or other conditions of the property. PM was not provided with a copy of the recorded land title records for subject property by the client and was not requested to complete a title search. Therefore, PM cannot comment on any potential relevant information that may have been obtained through review of these records. 232 Phase I ESA of the Proposed Chase Bank Branch Located North of SR 434 and East of Tuscawilla Road, Winter Springs, Florida PM Project No. 18-3732-0-0001; July 12, 2018 PM Environmental, Inc. Page 2 1.5: Special Terms and Conditions To the best of PM’s knowledge, no special terms or conditions apply to the preparation of this Phase I ESA that would deviate the scope of work from the ASTM Standard Practice E 1527-13. 1.6: User Reliance The Phase I ESA for the above referenced property represents the product of PM’s professional expertise and judgment in the environmental consulting industry, and it is reasonable for JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., ITS SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES to rely on PM’s Phase I ESA report. 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION The following sections provide general information about the subject property and surrounding areas. The subject property location is depicted on Figure 1, Site Location Map. A diagram of the subject property and adjoining properties is included as Figure 2, Site Plan. Photographs taken during the site reconnaissance are included in Appendix A. 2.1: Site Location and Legal Description The subject property is located north of SR 434 and east of Tuscawilla Road, Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida, 32708. The legal description for the property, as obtained from the Seminole County Property Appraiser for the parent parcel is: Lot 4 Winter Springs Apartments – A Replat Plat Book (82) Pages (63- 66). The subject property consists of the western portion of this parcel, and consists of 0.75 acres of undeveloped land. The property is currently zoned: TC – Town Center District. 2.2: Site and Vicinity Characteristics The subject property located in a suburban area and is surrounded by a mixture of commercial and residential uses. 2.3: Current Use of the Property The subject property is vacant wooded land. 2.4: Description of Structures, Roads or other Improvements on the Site The subject property consists of approximately 0.75 acres vacant wooded land; no structures or other improvements are present. 233 Phase I ESA of the Proposed Chase Bank Branch Located North of SR 434 and East of Tuscawilla Road, Winter Springs, Florida PM Project No. 18-3732-0-0001; July 12, 2018 PM Environmental, Inc. Page 3 2.5: Current Use of Adjoining Properties The following table provides information on current adjoining properties. Additional information about adjoining properties is included in Section 4.5. Location in Relation to Subject Property: Address Occupant Use North adjoining No Address None New Construction (Residential) East adjoining No Address None Vacant Land South adjoining 1205 E SR 434 Mobil Gasoline Dispensing Station West adjoining 1200 E SR 434 McDonald’s Fast Food Restaurant 3.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION The ASTM Standard defines a User as “the party seeking to use Practice E 1527 to complete an environmental site assessment. A User may include, without limitation, a potential purchaser of property, a potential tenant of property, an owner of property, a lender, or a property manager.” The User has specific obligations for completing a successful application of this practice as outlined in Section 6 of the ASTM Standard Practice E 1527-13. In order to qualify for one of the Landowner Liability Protections (LLPs) offered by the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfield’s Revitalization Act of 2001 (the “Brownfield’s Amendments”) (if desired), the User must provide certain information (if available) identified in the User Questionnaire to the environmental professional. Failure to provide this information could result in a determination that “all appropriate inquiry” is not complete. Information provided by the User is referenced in Sections 3.1 through 3.7 of this report. A copy of the completed User Questionnaire is included in Appendix B. 3.1: Recorded Land Title Records PM was not provided with land title records for the subject property by the User and was not requested to complete a chain of title for the subject property. PM reviewed reasonably ascertainable environmental liens and activity and use limitation documents, and none were identified as part of this assessment. Based upon the information reviewed as part of this Phase I ESA, PM has not identified the lack of provided land title records as a data failure that represents a significant data gap. 3.2: Environmental Liens and Activity and Use Limitations The User reported no knowledge of environmental liens or activity and use limitations associated with the subject property. 3.3: Specialized Knowledge The User indicated no specialized knowledge or experience related to the subject property or nearby properties. 234 Phase I ESA of the Proposed Chase Bank Branch Located North of SR 434 and East of Tuscawilla Road, Winter Springs, Florida PM Project No. 18-3732-0-0001; July 12, 2018 PM Environmental, Inc. Page 4 3.4: Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information The User indicated no specialized knowledge of experience related to the subject property and nearby properties. 3.5: Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues The User did not indicate any knowledge of a valuation reduction for the subject property because of environmental issues. 3.6: Owner, Property Manager and Occupant Information The User provided PM with relevant contact information. Interviews with relevant individuals are included in Section 6.0. 3.7: Reason for Performing Phase I ESA According to the User, this Phase I ESA was conducted as part of environmental due diligence related to a new lease for a bank branch. 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS REVIEW The following sections provide information obtained from standard and other regulatory and historical sources reviewed as part of this assessment. 4.1: Standard Federal and State Sources PM retained EDR to provide current regulatory database information compiled by a variety of federal and state regulatory agencies. A copy of the complete database is included in Appendix D. The following information was obtained: Type Regulatory Agency Database Approximate Minimum Search Distance (AMSD) Number of Sites within AMSD Federal National Priority List (NPL) Sites 1 mile 0 Federal Delisted National Priority List (DNPL) Sites ½ mile 0 Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Sites ½ mile 0 Federal CERCLIS No Further Remediation Action Planned (NFRAP) Sites subject property and adjoining properties 0 Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Corrective Action Report (CORRACTS) Sites 1 mile 0 Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS Treatment, Storage or Disposal (TSD) Sites ½ mile 0 Federal RCRA Large Quantity Generators (LQG) Sites subject property and adjoining properties 0 Federal RCRA Small Quantity Generators (SQG) Sites subject property and adjoining properties 0 Federal RCRA Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators (CESQG) Sites subject property and adjoining properties 0 235 Phase I ESA of the Proposed Chase Bank Branch Located North of SR 434 and East of Tuscawilla Road, Winter Springs, Florida PM Project No. 18-3732-0-0001; July 12, 2018 PM Environmental, Inc. Page 5 Type Regulatory Agency Database Approximate Minimum Search Distance (AMSD) Number of Sites within AMSD Federal RCRA Non-Generators (NON-GEN) Sites subject property and adjoining properties 2 Federal US Brownfield Sites ½ mile 0 Federal Institutional Control / Engineering Control Registries subject property 0 Federal Environmental Response and Notification System (ERNS) subject property 0 State & Tribal Hazardous Waste Sites (HWS) (equivalents to NPL and CERCLIS) 1 mile 0 State & Tribal Delisted Hazardous Waste Sites (HWS) 1 mile 0 State & Tribal Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites (SWLF) ½ mile 2 State & Tribal Historical Landfill Sites (HIST LF) ½ mile 0 State & Tribal Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Sites ½ mile 3 State & Tribal Registered Underground Storage Tank (UST) Sites subject property and adjoining properties 1 State & Tribal Institutional Control / Engineering Control Registries subject property 0 State & Tribal Brownfield Sites ½ mile 3 State DWM Contaminated Sites ½ mile 1 Either Unmappable Database Listings (a.k.a. Orphan Sites) database-dependent 0 4.1.1: Subject Property and Occupant Listings The subject property or its known occupants are not identified in the referenced databases. The subject property is listed on the State/Tribal Brownfield database as being located in the Town Center S.E.E.D. brownfield area. The designation of a brownfields area is based on the perceived presence of contamination and not the confirmed presence of contamination to qualify large municipal areas for brownfields economics incentives. Based on the nature of the listed and the lack of confirmed contamination on the subject property, PM has not identified this listing as a REC. 4.1.2: Adjoining and Nearby Sites PM’s review of the referenced databases also considered the potential or likelihood of contamination from adjoining and nearby sites. To evaluate which of the adjoining and nearby sites identified in the regulatory database report present an environmental risk to the subject property, PM considered the following criteria: The type of database on which the site is identified. The topographic position of the identified site relative to the subject property. The direction and distance of the identified site from the subject property. Local soil conditions in the subject property area. 236 Phase I ESA of the Proposed Chase Bank Branch Located North of SR 434 and East of Tuscawilla Road, Winter Springs, Florida PM Project No. 18-3732-0-0001; July 12, 2018 PM Environmental, Inc. Page 6 The known or inferred groundwater flow direction in the subject property area. The status of the respective regulatory agency-required investigation(s) of the identified site, if any. Surface and subsurface obstructions and diversions (e.g., buildings, roads, sewer systems, utility service lines, rivers, lakes, and ditches) located between the identified site and the subject property. Only those sites that are judged to present a potential environmental risk to the subject property and/or warrant additional clarification are further evaluated. Using the referenced criteria, and based upon a review of readily available information contained within the regulatory database report, PM did not identify adjoining (i.e., bordering) or nearby sites (e.g., properties within a ¼- mile radius) listed in the regulatory database report that were judged to present a potential environmental risk to the subject property, with the exception of the following: Mobil Winter Springs #731– This site is identified as 1205 E SR 434 and is the south adjoining property. Review of the regulatory database indicates this site is identified as a RCRA Non- Generator with no reported violations. The site is listed on the UST database for the removal of four 10,000-gallon unleaded gasoline USTs in 2008, and two in-service USTs (one 20,000-gallon unleaded gasoline and one 10,000-gallon diesel) installed in 2008. The site is listed on the LUST database for a petroleum release in 1993. The site is currently in the State of Florida Petroleum restoration program (PRP) and assessment/remediation activities are currently ongoing. A site assessment report (SAR) completed in 2013 indicated no contaminants of concern (COCs) detected above regulatory standards in up-gradient (towards the subject property) point of compliance wells. Groundwater flow was to the southeast (parallel to the subject property). Based on the distance from the subject property to the UST basin (across East SR 434 and at least 250 feet), groundwater monitoring results (no COCs above regulatory standards in upgradient point of compliance wells), and confirmed groundwater flow to the southeast (parallel to the subject property), PM has not identified this site as a REC. Handy Way Food Store #3333 – This site is identified as 170 Tuscawilla Road and located approximately 550 feet to the southwest of the subject property. Review of the regulatory database indicates this site is listed on the UST database for the removal of five (one 12,000- gallon and four 10,000-gallon unleaded gasoline) USTs in 1995, and on the LUST database for petroleum releases in 1987 and 2000 (treated as combined release). Assessment/remediation activities were completed under the State of Florida’s Petroleum Liability and Rehabilitation Insurance Program (PLIRP), and the site received a Site Rehabilitation Completion Order (SRCO) in 2013. Based on the distance from the subject property (across East SR 434 Street and at least 550 feet), removal of the petroleum source, regulatory status (SRCO), and confirmed groundwater flow to the southeast (parallel to the subject property), PM has not identified this site as a REC. 4.2: Additional Environmental Sources PM reviewed additional environmental sources including municipal records, regulatory records, and other reasonably ascertainable resources to determine if additional sites of potential concern were identified. No additional sites of potential concern were identified outside of those already discussed in Section 4.1. Additional historical information obtained from these sources that is relevant to the historical narrative for this property is discussed in Section 4.4.3. 237 Phase I ESA of the Proposed Chase Bank Branch Located North of SR 434 and East of Tuscawilla Road, Winter Springs, Florida PM Project No. 18-3732-0-0001; July 12, 2018 PM Environmental, Inc. Page 7 4.3: Physical Setting Sources PHYSICAL SETTING INFORMATION FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING AREA SOURCE Topography: Refer to Figure 1 for an excerpt of the Topographic Map Site Elevation 41 feet above mean sea level (msl) United States Geological Survey Division (U.S.G.S.) 7.5-Minute Topographic Map of the Casselberry, Florida Quadrangle, 2012 Topographic Gradient Southeast Closest Surface Water Retention pond located approximately 1,200 feet to the northwest of the subject property located at approximately 40 feet above msl. General Soil Characteristics: Refer to Appendix B for a copy of the soil survey map and soil type descriptions Soil Type Tavares-Millhopper complex United States Department of Agriculture, Custom Soil Resource Report for Seminole County, Florida (October 2, 2017) Description Consists of fine sand to a depth of 64 inches below ground surface (bgs), underlain by sandy loam to a depth of 80 inches bgs. Drainage for these soils is reported as moderately well drained with a depth to water of above 42 to 60 inches bgs. The risk for corrosion potential is reported as low for uncoated steel and high for concrete. Soil Type EauGallie and Immokalee fine sands Description Consists of fine sand to a depth of 80 inches bgs. Drainage for these soils is reported as poorly drained with a depth to water of about six to 18 inches bgs. The risk for corrosion potential is reported as high for uncoated steel and concrete. Area Specific Geology/Hydrogeology Characteristics: Geology Consists of fine sand with traces of silt or silty sand to depths ranging from 10 to 15 feet bgs, the maximum depths explored. Previous site investigations for nearby properties Hydrogeology Groundwater was encountered at depths ranging between four and six feet bgs. Groundwater flow direction was calculated generally to southeast. Oil and Gas Wells: Current Oil and Gas Wells on Subject Property None identified Florida Department of Environmental Protection Mining and Mineral Regulation: Oil & Gas Maps Historical Oil and Gas Wells On Subject property None identified Flood Zone Information: Flood Zone Flood Zone X (unshaded): Area of Minimal Flood Hazard FEMA Flood Zone Maps Jurisdictional Waters and Wetlands Wetland Information None identified National Wetland Inventory Maps 238 Phase I ESA of the Proposed Chase Bank Branch Located North of SR 434 and East of Tuscawilla Road, Winter Springs, Florida PM Project No. 18-3732-0-0001; July 12, 2018 PM Environmental, Inc. Page 8 PHYSICAL SETTING INFORMATION FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING AREA SOURCE Radon: Radon Information Zone 3: Review of the USEPA's Radon Map indicated that the subject property is located in Zone 3, areas with a predicted average indoor radon screening level less than 2 pCi/L (picoCuries per liter of air). EPA Radon Maps for Seminole County, Florida 4.4: Historical Use Information PM reviewed reasonably ascertainable records to identify obvious uses of the subject property from the present, back to the property’s obvious first developed use, or back to 1940, whichever is earlier. Reasonably ascertainable records reviewed as part of this Phase I ESA documented the use of the property back to 1940. No data failure was identified. 4.4.1: Historical Maps PM reviewed reasonably ascertainable aerial photographs for the subject property area. The sources and years reviewed are identified in the table below. Relevant aerial photographs are included in Appendix B. PM attempted to review reasonably ascertainable Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps for the subject property. However, no Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps were available for the subject property (Appendix B). The following table summarizes the sources reviewed and the information obtained about the subject property from these sources. Information obtained about the adjoining properties from these sources is summarized in Section 4.5. Aerial Photographs Maps Summary Year and Source Summary of Information 1940 Aerial (EDR) The subject property appears to be vacant land; East SR 434 is present to the south. 1948 Aerial (EDR) Similar to the previous aerial year. 1952 Aerial (EDR) Similar to the previous aerial year. 1957 Aerial (EDR) Similar to the previous aerial year. 1964 Aerial (EDR) Similar to the previous aerial year. 1973 Aerial (EDR) Similar to the previous aerial year. 1980 Aerial (EDR) Similar to the previous aerial year. 1989 Aerial (EDR) Similar to the previous aerial year. 239 Phase I ESA of the Proposed Chase Bank Branch Located North of SR 434 and East of Tuscawilla Road, Winter Springs, Florida PM Project No. 18-3732-0-0001; July 12, 2018 PM Environmental, Inc. Page 9 Year and Source Summary of Information 1993 Aerial (EDR) Similar to the previous aerial year. 1999 Aerial (EDR) Similar to the previous aerial year; East SR 434 has been widened. 2007 Aerial (EDR) Similar to the previous aerial year. 2010 Aerial (EDR) Similar to the previous aerial year. 2015 Aerial (EDR) Similar to the previous aerial year. 2017 Aerial (Google Earth) Similar to the previous aerial year. A summary of this information along with other historical sources is included in Section 4.4.5. 4.4.2: Local Street Directories The subject property is currently and has historically been vacant land with no assigned address. Therefore, no listings were available for review. PM reviewed listings for adjoining commercial properties. Information from these listings informed the conclusions in Section 4.5 of this report. 4.4.3: Previous Environmental Reports PM reviewed a previous Phase I ESA completed for the subject property and parcels to the north and east by Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon) and dated January 20, 2017. At the time of the Phase I ESA, the subject property and other parcels were vacant land. Terracon documented similar historical information as included in this Phase I ESA. No RECs were identified. PM did not identify any significant deficiencies through review of the previous Phase I ESA, a copy of which is included in Appendix C. 4.4.4: Summary of Historical Use Standard and other historical sources were able to document that the subject property has been vacant wooded land since at least 1940 through the current day. 4.5: Historical Use Information on Adjoining Properties The following paragraphs provide information about the adjoining properties obtained through review of reasonably ascertainable information. Current occupants of the properties are discussed in Section 2.5. North Adjoining Property The north adjoining property, no address, was formerly vacant land and is currently under development as an apartment complex. This site does not appear to represent a potential environmental concern. 240 Phase I ESA of the Proposed Chase Bank Branch Located North of SR 434 and East of Tuscawilla Road, Winter Springs, Florida PM Project No. 18-3732-0-0001; July 12, 2018 PM Environmental, Inc. Page 10 East Adjoining Property The east adjoining property is currently and has historically been vacant land. South Adjoining Property, across East SR 434 The south adjoining property, identified as 1205 East SR 434, was formerly vacant land and has been developed as a gasoline dispensing station since the early 1990s. This site is identified in the regulatory database. Refer to Section 4.1.2 for additional information. West Adjoining Property The west adjoining property, identified as 1200 East SR 434, was formerly vacant land and was developed with the current fast food restaurant in the mid-1990s. This site does not appear to represent a potential environmental concern. 5.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE Reconnaissance Information PM Field Personnel: Michael Green Site Reconnaissance Date: June 21, 2018 Weather Conditions: Sunny, 92 Degrees Fahrenheit Escort: None Limitations: Observations limited by dense vegetation throughout the subject property. 5.1: Subject Property Observations The subject property consists of one parcel containing approximately 0.75 acres of heavily wooded vacant land. No buildings are present on the subject property. The following table summarizes the site observations. No affirmative responses were identified. Category Feature Observed Interior Equipment Elevators No Air Compressors No Incinerators No Waste Treatment Systems No Presses/Stamping Equipment No Press Pits No Hydraulic Lifts or In-ground hoists No Paint Booth No Plating Tanks No Lathes, Screw Machines, etc. No Radiological equipment No Aboveground Chemical or Other Waste Storage or Waste Streams Aboveground Storage Tanks (ASTs) No Drums, Barrels and/or Containers > 5 gallons No Chip Hoppers No Hazardous or Petroleum Waste Streams No Underground Storage Tanks No Fuel Dispensers No 241 Phase I ESA of the Proposed Chase Bank Branch Located North of SR 434 and East of Tuscawilla Road, Winter Springs, Florida PM Project No. 18-3732-0-0001; July 12, 2018 PM Environmental, Inc. Page 11 Category Feature Observed Underground Chemical or Waste Storage, Drainage or Collection Systems Sumps or Cisterns No Dry Wells No Oil/Water Separators No Floor Drains, Trench Drains, etc. No Pipeline Markers No Exterior Observations Stressed Vegetation No Stained Soil or Pavement No Suspect Large Patches of Asphalt or Concrete No Monitoring Wells No Pad or Pole Mounted Transformers and/or Capacitors No Railroad Spurs No Emergency Generator No Soil Piles of Unknown Origin No Exterior Dumpsters with Staining No Leachate or Other Waste Seeps No Trash, Debris, and/or Other Waste Materials No Uncontrolled Dumping or Disposal Areas No Surface Water Discoloration, Sheen or Free Product No Strong, Pungent or Noxious Odors No Storm water retention or detention ponds No Storm drains No Pits, Ponds, Lagoons No Standing Surface Water, Swamps, Lakes, Rivers, Springs, or Surface Impoundments No Farm waste, feed lot spoils, or manure stockpiles No Known or potential prolonged use, misapplication, or storage / disposal of pesticides / herbicides No 5.2: Non-ASTM Scope Considerations PM has included a discussion of specific Non-ASTM Scope Considerations based upon industry standards and User requirements. Non-ASTM Item Observations or Information Potential Asbestos Containing Building Materials (ACBM) The subject property is vacant land with no structures, and therefore these items are not applicable. Lead Based Paint Visual Mold or Significant Moisture Damage 6.0 INTERVIEWS The objective of completing interviews with knowledgeable site contacts is to obtain information about the uses and physical characteristics of the property. In general, interviewees supported the information reviewed from other historical sources (i.e. aerial photos, city records, etc.). 242 Phase I ESA of the Proposed Chase Bank Branch Located North of SR 434 and East of Tuscawilla Road, Winter Springs, Florida PM Project No. 18-3732-0-0001; July 12, 2018 PM Environmental, Inc. Page 12 Represents Interviewed Name and Title Length of Time Associated with Subject Property Comments Current Property Owner Yes Mr. Bryan Schultz / Property Owner One year Mr. Bryan Shultz indicated that the property has been undeveloped since he took ownership and to his knowledge the property was undeveloped land prior to his purchase in 2017. He is not aware of any USTs, ASTs, chemical releases, or environmental liens associated with the subject property or surrounding properties. Key Site Manager Former Property Owner No Not applicable Not applicable Contact information for the former owner was not reasonably ascertainable or provided by the User Current Occupant(s) No Not applicable Not applicable The subject property is currently vacant land, therefore, there are no current occupant(s). Former Occupant(s) No Not applicable Not applicable Contact information for the former occupants was not reasonably ascertainable or provided by the User Other(s) No Not applicable Not applicable No other relevant interviews were conducted as part of this Phase I ESA. 7.0 FINDINGS, OPINIONS AND CONCLUSIONS 7.1: De Minimis Condition A de minimis condition, as defined in the ASTM Standard, is a condition that generally does not present a threat to human health or the environment and generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies. Conditions determined to be de minimis are not RECs or CRECs. No de minimis conditions were identified during this assessment. 7.2: Significant Data Gaps A data gap, as defined in the ASTM Standard, is a lack of or inability to obtain information required by the ASTM Standard despite good faith efforts by the environmental professional to gather such information. The environmental professional must then determine whether these gaps are significant. PM did not identify or encounter any instances of significant data gaps during the course of this ESA. 243 Phase I ESA of the Proposed Chase Bank Branch Located North of SR 434 and East of Tuscawilla Road, Winter Springs, Florida PM Project No. 18-3732-0-0001; July 12, 2018 PM Environmental, Inc. Page 13 7.3: Historical Recognized Environmental Conditions (HRECs) An HREC, as defined in the ASTM Standard, is a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the subject property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted residential use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the subject property to any required controls. PM has not identified any HRECs in association with the subject property. 7.4: Controlled Recognized Environmental Conditions (CRECs) A CREC, as defined in the ASTM Standard, is a recognized environmental condition (REC) resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls. PM has not identified any CRECs in association with the subject property. 7.5: Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) We have performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E 1527-13 of the Proposed Chase Bank Branch located North of SR 434 and East of Tuscawilla Road, Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida, the property. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 1.4 of this report. This assessment has revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions connected with the property. 7.6: Recommendations We have performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E 1527-13 of the Proposed Chase Bank Branch located North of SR 434 and East of Tuscawilla Road, Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida, the property. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 1.4 of this report. This assessment has revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions connected with the property. Therefore, no further investigation is recommended at this time. 8.0 SIGNATURE(S) OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL(S) We declare that, to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, we meet the definition of Environmental professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR 312 and we have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. We have developed and performed the all appropriate inquires in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. Michael Green, CHMM Beth Sexton Representative for PM Environmental, Inc. National Due Diligence Manager 244 Phase I ESA of the Proposed Chase Bank Branch Located North of SR 434 and East of Tuscawilla Road, Winter Springs, Florida PM Project No. 18-3732-0-0001; July 12, 2018 PM Environmental, Inc. Page 14 9.0 REFERENCES The following published sources were utilized during completion of this Phase I ESA: Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process, ASTM, ASTM Designation E 1527-13, Published November 2013. United States Geological Survey Division (U.S.G.S.) 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Casselberry, Florida Quadrangle, 2012. Custom Soil Survey of Seminole County, Florida, U.S. Department of Agriculture, October 2017. EDR Digital Archive of Local Street Directories. Years reviewed and coverage provided: 1992-2014. Polk’s City Directories provided by EDR. Years reviewed: 1968-1986. Years provided with coverage: None In addition, PM reviewed the following previous site investigation: Name of Report Date of Report Company that Prepared Report Phase I ESA 1-20-2017 Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon) 245 Figures 246 Figure 1: Site Location Map Proposed Chase Bank Branch North of SR 434 and East of Tuscawilla Road, Winter Springs, Florida PM Project No. 18-3732-0-0001 United States Geological Survey Division (U.S.G.S.) 7.5-Minute Topographic Map of the Casselberry, Florida Quadrangle 247 Figure 2: Site Plan Proposed Chase Bank Branch North of SR 434 and East of Tuscawilla Road, Winter Springs, Florida PM Project No. 18-3732-0-0001 248 Appendix A 249 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS 250 Photographs From Site Reconnaissance PM Project No. 18-3732-0-0001 Location: SR 434 and Tuscawilla Road, Winter Springs, Florida Photograph 1 View looking east at the south portion of the subject property. Photograph 2 View looking north at the west portion of the subject property. 251 Photographs From Site Reconnaissance PM Project No. 18-3732-0-0001 Location: NEC SR 434 and Tuscawilla Road, Winter Springs, Florida Photograph 3 View looking north at the east portion of the subject property. Photograph 4 View looking south at the east portion of the subject property. 252 Photographs From Site Reconnaissance PM Project No. 18-3732-0-0001 Location: NEC SR 434 and Tuscawilla Road, Winter Springs, Florida Photograph 5 View looking east at the north portion of the subject property. Photograph 6 View looking south at the west portion of the subject property. 253 Photographs From Site Reconnaissance PM Project No. 18-3732-0-0001 Location: NEC SR 434 and Tuscawilla Road, Winter Springs, Florida Photograph 7 View looking north at the west portion of the subject property. Photograph 8 North adjoining property (New Construction – Residential) 254 Photographs From Site Reconnaissance PM Project No. 18-3732-0-0001 Location: NEC SR 434 and Tuscawilla Road, Winter Springs, Florida Photograph 9 East adjoining property (Vacant Land). Photograph 10 South adjoining property (Mobil). 255 Photographs From Site Reconnaissance PM Project No. 18-3732-0-0001 Location: NEC SR 434 and Tuscawilla Road, Winter Springs, Florida Photograph 11 West adjoining property (McDonald’s) 256 Appendix B 257 USER QUESTIONNAIRE 258 259 260 261 SOIL SURVEY INFORMATION 262 United States Department of Agriculture A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local participants Custom Soil Resource Report for Seminole County, FloridaNatural Resources Conservation Service June 18, 2018263 Preface Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas. They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers. Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance the environment. Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions. The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations. Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/ portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center (https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs) or your NRCS State Soil Scientist (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/contactus/? cid=nrcs142p2_053951). Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or underground installations. The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require 2 264 alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 3 265 Contents Preface....................................................................................................................2 How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5 Soil Map..................................................................................................................8 Soil Map................................................................................................................9 Legend................................................................................................................10 Map Unit Legend................................................................................................11 Map Unit Descriptions.........................................................................................11 Seminole County, Florida................................................................................13 13—EauGallie and Immokalee fine sands..................................................13 31—Tavares-Millhopper complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes.............................15 Soil Information for All Uses...............................................................................18 Soil Reports........................................................................................................18 Soil Qualities and Features.............................................................................18 Soil Features...............................................................................................18 References............................................................................................................21 4 266 How Soil Surveys Are Made Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other biological activity. Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA. The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a specific location on the landscape. Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries. Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units). Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil 5 267 scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and research. The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map. The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape, and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded. These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color, depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil typically vary from one point to another across the landscape. Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other properties. While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management. Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same kinds of soil. Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example, soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date. After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and Custom Soil Resource Report 6 268 identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings, fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately. Custom Soil Resource Report 7 269 Soil Map The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit. 8 270 9 Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map 31743303174340317435031743603174370317438031743903174400317441031744203174430317444031744503174330317434031743503174360317437031743803174390317440031744103174420317443031744403174450474420 474430 474440 474450 474460 474470 474480 474490 474500 474420 474430 474440 474450 474460 474470 474480 474490 474500 28° 41' 49'' N 81° 15' 43'' W28° 41' 49'' N81° 15' 39'' W28° 41' 45'' N 81° 15' 43'' W28° 41' 45'' N 81° 15' 39'' WN Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84 0 30 60 120 180 Feet 0 5 10 20 30 Meters Map Scale: 1:630 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet. Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. 271 MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Unit Polygons Soil Map Unit Lines Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features Blowout Borrow Pit Clay Spot Closed Depression Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot Landfill Lava Flow Marsh or swamp Mine or Quarry Miscellaneous Water Perennial Water Rock Outcrop Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip Sodic Spot Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot Other Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:20,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Seminole County, Florida Survey Area Data: Version 16, Oct 2, 2017 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Jan 19, 2015—Feb 20, 2015 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Custom Soil Resource Report 10 272 Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 13 EauGallie and Immokalee fine sands 0.1 13.9% 31 Tavares-Millhopper complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes 0.9 86.1% Totals for Area of Interest 1.0 100.0% Map Unit Descriptions The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils. Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however, Custom Soil Resource Report 11 273 onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties and qualities. Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement. Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series. Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas. These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups. A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example. An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example. Custom Soil Resource Report 12 274 Seminole County, Florida 13—EauGallie and Immokalee fine sands Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 1lmpx Elevation: 20 to 100 feet Mean annual precipitation: 46 to 54 inches Mean annual air temperature: 68 to 75 degrees F Frost-free period: 332 to 362 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Eaugallie and similar soils: 56 percent Immokalee and similar soils: 35 percent Minor components: 9 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Eaugallie Setting Landform: Flatwoods on marine terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf Down-slope shape: Convex Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Sandy and loamy marine deposits Typical profile A - 0 to 6 inches: fine sand E - 6 to 18 inches: fine sand Bh - 18 to 30 inches: fine sand BE - 30 to 45 inches: fine sand Btg - 45 to 64 inches: sandy clay loam Cg - 64 to 80 inches: loamy sand Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Poorly drained Runoff class: High Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to high (0.06 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 6 to 18 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum in profile: 4.0 Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 6.1 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D Custom Soil Resource Report 13 275 Forage suitability group: Sandy soils on flats of mesic or hydric lowlands (G155XB141FL) Other vegetative classification: South Florida Flatwoods (R155XY003FL) Hydric soil rating: No Description of Immokalee Setting Landform: Flatwoods on marine terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf Down-slope shape: Convex Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Sandy marine deposits Typical profile A - 0 to 4 inches: fine sand E - 4 to 42 inches: fine sand Bh - 42 to 62 inches: fine sand BC - 62 to 80 inches: fine sand Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Poorly drained Runoff class: High Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 6 to 18 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum in profile: 4.0 Available water storage in profile: Low (about 5.0 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D Forage suitability group: Sandy soils on flats of mesic or hydric lowlands (G155XB141FL) Other vegetative classification: South Florida Flatwoods (R155XY003FL) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Malabar Percent of map unit: 9 percent Landform: Drainageways on marine terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Concave Other vegetative classification: Slough (R155XY011FL) Hydric soil rating: Yes Custom Soil Resource Report 14 276 31—Tavares-Millhopper complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 2w4gz Elevation: 20 to 150 feet Mean annual precipitation: 45 to 53 inches Mean annual air temperature: 70 to 77 degrees F Frost-free period: 350 to 365 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Tavares and similar soils: 63 percent Millhopper and similar soils: 32 percent Minor components: 5 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Tavares Setting Landform: Ridges on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve, rise Down-slope shape: Convex Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Eolian or sandy marine deposits Typical profile A - 0 to 6 inches: fine sand C - 6 to 80 inches: fine sand Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 5 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Moderately well drained Runoff class: Very low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High to very high (5.95 to 19.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 42 to 72 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum in profile: 4.0 Available water storage in profile: Very low (about 2.6 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3s Hydrologic Soil Group: A Custom Soil Resource Report 15 277 Forage suitability group: Sandy soils on rises, knolls, and ridges of mesic uplands (G154XB121FL) Hydric soil rating: No Description of Millhopper Setting Landform: Knolls on marine terraces, rises on marine terraces Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve, riser Down-slope shape: Convex Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Sandy and loamy marine deposits Typical profile A - 0 to 6 inches: fine sand E - 6 to 64 inches: fine sand Bt - 64 to 76 inches: sandy loam Btg - 76 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 5 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Moderately well drained Runoff class: Very low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to high (0.06 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 42 to 60 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum in profile: 4.0 Available water storage in profile: Low (about 4.8 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3s Hydrologic Soil Group: A Forage suitability group: Sandy soils on rises, knolls, and ridges of mesic uplands (G154XB121FL) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Candler Percent of map unit: 3 percent Landform: Knolls on marine terraces, ridges on marine terraces Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Convex Hydric soil rating: No Astatula Percent of map unit: 2 percent Landform: Ridges on marine terraces, hills on marine terraces Custom Soil Resource Report 16 278 Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve, side slope, tread Down-slope shape: Linear, convex Across-slope shape: Convex Other vegetative classification: Longleaf Pine-Turkey Oak Hills (R154XY002FL) Hydric soil rating: No Custom Soil Resource Report 17 279 Soil Information for All Uses Soil Reports The Soil Reports section includes various formatted tabular and narrative reports (tables) containing data for each selected soil map unit and each component of each unit. No aggregation of data has occurred as is done in reports in the Soil Properties and Qualities and Suitabilities and Limitations sections. The reports contain soil interpretive information as well as basic soil properties and qualities. A description of each report (table) is included. Soil Qualities and Features This folder contains tabular reports that present various soil qualities and features. The reports (tables) include all selected map units and components for each map unit. Soil qualities are behavior and performance attributes that are not directly measured, but are inferred from observations of dynamic conditions and from soil properties. Example soil qualities include natural drainage, and frost action. Soil features are attributes that are not directly part of the soil. Example soil features include slope and depth to restrictive layer. These features can greatly impact the use and management of the soil. Soil Features This table gives estimates of various soil features. The estimates are used in land use planning that involves engineering considerations. A restrictive layer is a nearly continuous layer that has one or more physical, chemical, or thermal properties that significantly impede the movement of water and air through the soil or that restrict roots or otherwise provide an unfavorable root environment. Examples are bedrock, cemented layers, dense layers, and frozen layers. The table indicates the hardness and thickness of the restrictive layer, both of which significantly affect the ease of excavation. Depth to top is the vertical distance from the soil surface to the upper boundary of the restrictive layer. Subsidence is the settlement of organic soils or of saturated mineral soils of very low density. Subsidence generally results from either desiccation and shrinkage, or oxidation of organic material, or both, following drainage. Subsidence takes place gradually, usually over a period of several years. The table shows the expected 18 280 initial subsidence, which usually is a result of drainage, and total subsidence, which results from a combination of factors. Potential for frost action is the likelihood of upward or lateral expansion of the soil caused by the formation of segregated ice lenses (frost heave) and the subsequent collapse of the soil and loss of strength on thawing. Frost action occurs when moisture moves into the freezing zone of the soil. Temperature, texture, density, saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat), content of organic matter, and depth to the water table are the most important factors considered in evaluating the potential for frost action. It is assumed that the soil is not insulated by vegetation or snow and is not artificially drained. Silty and highly structured, clayey soils that have a high water table in winter are the most susceptible to frost action. Well drained, very gravelly, or very sandy soils are the least susceptible. Frost heave and low soil strength during thawing cause damage to pavements and other rigid structures. Risk of corrosion pertains to potential soil-induced electrochemical or chemical action that corrodes or weakens uncoated steel or concrete. The rate of corrosion of uncoated steel is related to such factors as soil moisture, particle-size distribution, acidity, and electrical conductivity of the soil. The rate of corrosion of concrete is based mainly on the sulfate and sodium content, texture, moisture content, and acidity of the soil. Special site examination and design may be needed if the combination of factors results in a severe hazard of corrosion. The steel or concrete in installations that intersect soil boundaries or soil layers is more susceptible to corrosion than the steel or concrete in installations that are entirely within one kind of soil or within one soil layer. For uncoated steel, the risk of corrosion, expressed as low, moderate, or high, is based on soil drainage class, total acidity, electrical resistivity near field capacity, and electrical conductivity of the saturation extract. For concrete, the risk of corrosion also is expressed as low, moderate, or high. It is based on soil texture, acidity, and amount of sulfates in the saturation extract. Custom Soil Resource Report 19 281 Soil Features–Seminole County, Florida Map symbol and soil name Restrictive Layer Subsidence Potential for frost action Risk of corrosion Kind Depth to top Thickness Hardness Initial Total Uncoated steel Concrete Low-RV- High Range Low- High Low- High In In In In 13—EauGallie and Immokalee fine sands Eaugallie ————None High High Immokalee ————None High High Malabar ————None High Low 31—Tavares- Millhopper complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes Tavares ——0 0 None Low High Millhopper ——0 0 None Low High Candler ——0 0 None Low High Astatula ——0 0 None Low Moderate Custom Soil Resource Report 20 282 References American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. 24th edition. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-79/31. Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States. Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States. Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States. National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries. Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_054262 Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053577 Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053580 Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands Section. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical Report Y-87-1. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/ home/?cid=nrcs142p2_053374 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/ detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084 21 283 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nrcs/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/? cid=nrcs142p2_053624 United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf Custom Soil Resource Report 22 284 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS 285 2015 1"=500'Flight Year: 2015 USDA/NAIP 2010 1"=500'Flight Year: 2010 USDA/NAIP 2007 1"=500'Flight Year: 2007 USDA/NAIP 1999 1"=500'Acquisition Date: January 07, 1999 USGS/DOQQ 1993 1"=500'Flight Date: February 13, 1993 FLDOT 1989 1"=500'Flight Date: February 26, 1989 FLDOT 1980 1"=500'Flight Date: April 16, 1980 FLDOT 1973 1"=500'Flight Date: February 06, 1973 FLDOT 1964 1"=500'Flight Date: October 23, 1964 FLDOT 1957 1"=500'Flight Date: November 02, 1957 USGS 1952 1"=500'Flight Date: March 17, 1952 USGS 1948 1"=500'Flight Date: November 25, 1948 USGS 1940 1"=500'Flight Date: April 10, 1940 USGS EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package 06/19/18 NEC SR 434 and Tuscawilla Road Site Name:Client Name: PM Environmental, Inc. NEC SR 434 and Tuscawilla Road 3340 Ranger Road Winter Springs, FL 32708 Lansing, MI 48906 EDR Inquiry #5335716.8 Contact:David Balash Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo per decade. Search Results: Year Scale Details Source When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more information contact your EDR Account Executive. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2018 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. 5335716 8-page 2286 5335716.8 2015 = 500'287 5335716.8 2010 = 500'288 5335716.8 2007 = 500'289 5335716.8 1999 = 500'290 5335716.8 1993 = 500'291 5335716.8 1989 = 500'292 5335716.8 1980 = 500'293 5335716.8 1973 = 500'294 5335716.8 1964 = 500'295 5335716.8 1957 = 500'296 5335716.8 1952 = 500'297 5335716.8 1948 = 500'298 5335716.8 1940 = 500'299 NO SANBORN FIRE INSURANCE MAPS 300 Certified Sanborn® Map Report Inquiry Number: 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com NEC SR 434 and Tuscawilla Road NEC SR 434 and Tuscawilla Road Winter Springs, FL 32708 June 18, 2018 5335716.3 301 Certified Sanborn® Map Report Certified Sanborn Results: Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. page- The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 million fire insurance maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow and others which track historical property usage in approximately 12,000 American cities and towns. Collections searched: Library of Congress University Publications of America EDR Private Collection The Sanborn Library LLC Since 1866™ Limited Permission To Make Copies Sanborn® Library search results Contact:EDR Inquiry # Site Name: Client Name: Certification # PO # Project 06/18/18 NEC SR 434 and Tuscawilla Road NEC SR 434 and Tuscawilla Road PM Environmental, Inc. 3340 Ranger Road Winter Springs, FL 32708 5335716.3 Lansing, MI 48906 David Balash The Sanborn Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by PM Environmental, Inc. were identified for the years listed below. The Sanborn Library is the largest, most complete collection of fire insurance maps. The collection includes maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow, and others. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) is authorized to grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by the Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for the collection. Results can be authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/sanborn. The Sanborn Library is continually enhanced with newly identified map archives. This report accesses all maps in the collection as of the day this report was generated. 96D0-4D9F-865C NA UNMAPPED PROPERTY 18-3732-0-0001 This report certifies that the complete holdings of the Sanborn Library, LLC collection have been searched based on client supplied target property information, and fire insurance maps covering the target property were not found. Certification #: 96D0-4D9F-865C PM Environmental, Inc. (the client) is permitted to make up to FIVE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map accompanying this report solely for the limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made directly to an EDR Account Executive, the client may be permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client, its customer and their agents with EDR's copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request. This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2018 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 5335716 3 2 302 ASSESSING DEPARTMENT RECORDS 303 304 305 Appendix C 306 PREVIOUS SITE INVESTIGATION 307 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Winter Springs Site Northwest Corner of State Road 434 and Michael Blake Boulevard Winter Springs, Seminole County,Florida January 20, 2017 Terracon Project No. H1177004 Prepared for: Catalyst Development Partners Atlanta, Georgia Prepared by: Terracon Consultants, Inc. Winter Park, Florida 308 309 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... i Findings ....................................................................................................................................... i Opinions and Conclusions ........................................................................................................... iii Recommendations ...................................................................................................................... iii 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Site Description .............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Scope of Services........................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Standard of Care ............................................................................................................ 1 1.4 Additional Scope Limitations, ASTM Deviations and Data Gaps ...................................... 2 1.5 Reliance ......................................................................................................................... 3 1.6 Client Provided Information ............................................................................................. 3 2.0 PHYSICAL SETTING ................................................................................................................. 4 3.0 HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION ............................................................................................ 6 3.1 Historical Topographic Maps, Aerial Photographs, Sanborn Maps................................... 6 3.2 Historical City Directories ................................................................................................ 7 3.3 Site Ownership ............................................................................................................... 8 3.4 Title Search .................................................................................................................... 8 3.5 Environmental Liens and Activity and Use Limitations ..................................................... 8 3.6 Interviews Regarding Current and Historical Site Uses.................................................... 8 3.7 Prior Report Review ....................................................................................................... 9 4.0 RECORDS REVIEW ................................................................................................................... 9 4.1 Federal and State/Tribal Databases ................................................................................ 9 4.2 Local Agency Inquiries .................................................................................................. 12 4.3 Local Area Knowledge .................................................................................................. 13 5.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE ....................................................................................................... 13 5.1 General Site Information ............................................................................................... 13 5.2 Overview of Current Site Occupants and Operations .................................................... 13 5.3 Site Observations ......................................................................................................... 14 6.0 ADJOINING PROPERTY RECONNAISSANCE ........................................................................ 16 7.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES ......................................................................................................... 16 8.0 DECLARATION ........................................................................................................................ 16 310 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) APPENDICES APPENDIX A Exhibit 1 - Topographic Map, Exhibit 2 - Site Diagram APPENDIX B Site Photographs APPENDIX C Historical Documentation and User Questionnaire APPENDIX D Environmental Database Information APPENDIX E Credentials APPENDIX F Description of Terms and Acronyms 311 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Winter Springs Site ■ Winter Springs, FL January 20, 2017 ■ Terracon Project No. H1177004 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was performed in accordance with Terracon Proposal No. PH1177004 dated January 4, 2017, and was conducted consistent with the procedures included in ASTM E1527-13,Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process. The ESA was conducted under the supervision or responsible charge of Mark W. Mulligan, Environmental Professional. Natthaphon Prapinpongsanone performed the site reconnaissance on January 17, 2017. Findings A summary of findings is provided below. It should be recognized that details were not included or fully developed in this section, and the report must be read in its entirety for a comprehensive understanding of the items contained herein. Site Description and Use The site is located on the northwest corner of State Road 434 and Michael Blake Boulevard, Winter Springs, Florida and consists of one undeveloped parcel (Seminole County Parcel Number 26-20-30-5AR-0A00-006C) a 17.37 acre tract of undeveloped land. Historical Information Based on a review of the historical resources, the site consisted of a mixture of grassed and wooded undeveloped land with unimproved roads throughout the site by at least 1948. The USGS Topographic Map, Casselberry, Florida, dated 1994, depicts a railroad running through the central portion of the site from the south to north. Although there is potential for the presence of arsenic in soils adjacent to historical railroads due to old railroad ties dipped in an arsenic solution, arsenic weed-control sprays, and arsenic-laced slag used as railroad bed fill, the potential presence of arsenic in soils were assess in 2015 and is further discussed below. By 2008, there is an apparent area on the eastern boundary with displaced soil. In 2015, a retention pond appears in the northwestern quadrant. Beginning by 1948 until the 1980’s, the surrounding properties consisted of apparent citrus groves wooded land, State Road 434, Tuskawilla Drive, Cross Seminole Trail and Michael Blake Boulevard. The adjoining property north of the site has remained wooded. The adjoining properties to the west was depicted with a commercial building in the 1990s, and Winter Springs Town Center was developed beyond Tuskawilla Road by 2008. An existing gasoline station (aka Mobil-Winter Springs #73) was adjoined south of the site beyond State Road 434 by 1995. The adjoining property east of the site beyond Michael Blake Boulevard was developed with an existing stormwater pond by 2015. 312 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Winter Springs Site ■ Winter Springs, FL January 20, 2017 ■ Terracon Project No. H1177004 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable ii Records Review Mobil-Winter Springs #73, leaking underground storage tank (LUST), underground storage tank (UST) and Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) Hist Auto facility, adjoins south of the site, across State Road 434. According to the EDR report, a petroleum discharge dated April 26, 1993, was determined eligible for Florida’s Petroleum Liability and Restoration Insurance Program (PLRIP). A Limited Closure Summary Report prepared by Groundwater & Environmental Services, Inc. dated December 11, 2008, benzene was detected at concentration exceeding Florida’s leachability based soil cleanup target level (SCTL), but below commercial SCTL. A Site Assessment Report prepared by CB&I dated July 30, 2013, benzene and naphthalene were detected at concentrations exceeding Florida’s groundwater cleanup target level (GCTLs), and groundwater was measured to southeast and east direction, toward the site. A Storage Tank Facility Annual Compliance Site Inspection Report prepared by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) dated December 19, 2016, indicated that the facility was minor out of compliance due to the lack of records for a review and the lack of testing of release detection device. Additional information associated with assessment was not identified on OCULUS website. However, based on analytical results of groundwater assessment at the site on November 24, 2015, the facility does not represent a recognized environmental condition (REC) at this time. The remaining facilities listed in the database report do not appear to represent RECs to the site at this time based upon regulatory status, apparent topographic gradient, and/or distance from the site. Previous Reports A previous Phase I Environmental Site Assessment report for the site dated October 28, 2015, was prepared by Terracon (Project No. H1157294). The report indicated that RECs were identified associated with the southwestern-adjoining and up-gradient Mobile gasoline station is still undergoing monitoring from a petroleum spill in 1993 and evidence on-site of a historical railroad. Potential historic application and releases of arsenic in connection with the historical railroad. The report recommended subsurface investigation for potential arsenic impacts in the shallow soils associated with the former railroad is recommended. Additionally, assessment of the groundwater along the southern boundary of the site should occur to determine if any petroleum impacted groundwater has migrated from the Mobile gasoline station onto the site. A Limited Site Investigation report for the site dated November 24, 2015, prepared by Terracon (Project No. H1157294). Soil and groundwater samples were collected to evaluate the identified RECs in the Phase I ESA report dated October 28, 2015. Groundwater was encountered approximately 9 to 10 feet below ground surface (bgs). Analytical results of contaminant of concerns in soil and groundwater samples did not exceed Florida’s cleanup target levels. The report indicated that based on the results of the investigation additional assessment of the RECs identified in the previous Phase I ESA at the site does not appear warranted. 313 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Winter Springs Site ■ Winter Springs, FL January 20, 2017 ■ Terracon Project No. H1177004 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable iii Site Reconnaissance At the time of the site reconnaissance, the site was partially wooded land. Indications of RECs were not observed within the site at the time of reconnaissance. Adjoining Properties Currently, the adjoining properties to the north are Cross Seminole Trail and wooded land. Michael Blake Boulevard adjoins east of the site followed by wooded land and a stormwater pond. State Road 434 adjoins south of the site followed by wooded and Mobil gasoline station. The adjoining property to the west is McDonalds followed by Tuskawilla Road and Winter Springs Town Center. Indications of RECs were not observed in connection with reconnaissance of the adjoining properties. Opinions and Conclusions We have performed a Phase I ESA consistent with the procedures included in ASTM Practice E 1527-13 on Wawa site located on Northwest Corner of State Road 434 and Michael Blake Boulevard in Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida. RECs were not identified in connection with the property. Recommendations Based on the scope of services, limitations, and findings of this assessment, Terracon did not identify RECs, which, in our opinion, warrant additional investigation at this time. 314 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Winter Springs Site ■ Winter Springs, FL January 20, 2017 ■ Terracon Project No. H1177004 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Site Description Site Name Winter Springs Site Site Location/Address Northwest Corner of State Road 434 and Michael Blake Boulevard, Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida Land Area 17.37 acres Site Improvements Undeveloped land The site location is depicted on Exhibit 1 of Appendix A, which was reproduced from a portion of the USGS 7.5-minute series topographic map. A Site Diagram of the site and adjoining properties is included as Exhibit 2 of Appendix A. Acronyms and terms used in this report are described in Appendix F. 1.2 Scope of Services This Phase I ESA was performed in accordance with Terracon Proposal No. PH1177004 dated January 4, 2017, and was conducted consistent with the procedures included in ASTM E1527- 13,Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process. The purpose of this ESA was to assist the client in developing information to identify RECs in connection with the site as reflected by the scope of this report. This purpose was undertaken through user-provided information, a regulatory database review, historical and physical records review, interviews, including local government inquiries, as applicable, and a visual noninvasive reconnaissance of the site and adjoining properties. Limitations, ASTM deviations, and significant data gaps (if identified) are noted in the applicable sections of the report. 1.3 Standard of Care This ESA was performed in accordance with generally accepted practices of this profession, undertaken in similar studies at the same time and in the same geographical area. We have endeavored to meet this standard of care, but may be limited by conditions encountered during performance, a client-driven scope of work, or inability to review information not received by the report date. Where appropriate, these limitations are discussed in the text of the report, and an evaluation of their significance with respect to our findings has been conducted. Phase I ESAs, such as the one performed at this site, are of limited scope, are noninvasive, and cannot eliminate the potential that hazardous, toxic, or petroleum substances are present or have been released at the site beyond what is identified by the limited scope of this ESA. In conducting the limited scope of services described herein, certain sources of information and public records 315 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Winter Springs Site ■ Winter Springs, FL January 20, 2017 ■ Terracon Project No. H1177004 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 2 were not reviewed. It should be recognized that environmental concerns may be documented in public records that were not reviewed. No ESA can wholly eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for RECs in connection with a property. Performance of this practice is intended to reduce, but not eliminate, uncertainty regarding the potential for RECs. No warranties, express or implied, are intended or made. The limitations herein must be considered when the user of this report formulates opinions as to risks associated with the site or otherwise uses the report for any other purpose. These risks may be further evaluated – but not eliminated – through additional research or assessment. We will, upon request, advise you of additional research or assessment options that may be available and associated costs. 1.4 Additional Scope Limitations, ASTM Deviations and Data Gaps Based upon the agreed-on scope of services, this ESA did not include subsurface or other invasive assessments, vapor intrusion assessments or indoor air quality assessments (i.e. evaluation of the presence of vapors within a building structure), business environmental risk evaluations, or other services not particularly identified and discussed herein. Credentials of the company (Statement of Qualifications) have not been included in this report but are available upon request. Pertinent documents are referred to in the text of this report, and a separate reference section has not been included. Reasonable attempts were made to obtain information within the scope and time constraints set forth by the client; however, in some instances, information requested is not, or was not, received by the issuance date of the report. Information obtained for this ESA was received from several sources that we believe to be reliable; nonetheless, the authenticity or reliability of these sources cannot and is not warranted hereunder. This ESA was further limited by the following: n Historical information was not ascertainable prior to 1948. n Reasonable attempts were made to contact the site owner and local government officials; however, at the issuance of this report, responses had not been received from the Seminole County Fire Department. n Terracon attempted to contact the current owner, Winter Springs Holdings Inc, and the previous owners, Main Street Associates LLC, Schrimsher Land Fund V Ltd, Schrimsher Land Fund 1986 II Ltd, Schrimsher Land Fund VI Ltd, Schrimsher Inc and Schrimsher Land Fund 1985 Ltd, identified on the Seminole County Property Appraiser website; however, contact information was not identified through Whitepages.com. n During the visual site reconnaissance, certain portion of the site was covered by dense unmaintained ground vegetation and wooded land, which limited the observation of surface conditions. 316 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Winter Springs Site ■ Winter Springs, FL January 20, 2017 ■ Terracon Project No. H1177004 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 3 An evaluation of the significance of limitations and missing information with respect to our findings has been conducted, and where appropriate, significant data gaps are identified and discussed in the text of the report. However, it should be recognized that an evaluation of significant data gaps is based on the information available at the time of report issuance, and an evaluation of information received after the report issuance date may result in an alteration of our conclusions, recommendations, or opinions. We have no obligation to provide information obtained or discovered by us after the issuance date of the report, or to perform any additional services, regardless of whether the information would affect any conclusions, recommendations, or opinions in the report. This disclaimer specifically applies to any information that has not been provided by the client. This report represents our service to you as of the report date and constitutes our final document; its text may not be altered after final issuance. Findings in this report are based upon the site’s current utilization, information derived from the most recent reconnaissance and from other activities described herein; such information is subject to change. Certain indicators of the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products may have been latent, inaccessible, unobservable, or not present during the most recent reconnaissance and may subsequently become observable (such as after site renovation or development). Further, these services are not to be construed as legal interpretation or advice. 1.5 Reliance This ESA report is prepared for the exclusive use and reliance of Catalyst Development Partners, Winter Springs Apartments, LP, RECAP Opportunity Fund II, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership and Fifth Third Bank, an Ohio Corp.Use or reliance by any other party is prohibited without the written authorization of Catalyst Development Partners and Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon). Reliance on the ESA by the client and all authorized parties will be subject to the terms, conditions and limitations stated in the proposal, ESA report, and Terracon’s Agreement. The limitation of liability defined in the Agreement is the aggregate limit of Terracon’s liability to the client and all relying parties. Continued viability of this report is subject to ASTM E1527-13 Sections 4.6 and 4.8. If the ESA will be used by a different user (third party) than the user for whom the ESA was originally prepared, the third party must also satisfy the user’s responsibilities in Section 6 of ASTM E1527- 13. 1.6 Client Provided Information Prior to the site visit, Mr. Mark Mechlowitz, client’s representative, was asked to provide the following user questionnaire information as described in ASTM E1527-13 Section 6. 317 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Winter Springs Site ■ Winter Springs, FL January 20, 2017 ■ Terracon Project No. H1177004 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 4 Client Questionnaire Responses Client Questionnaire Item Client Did Not Respond Client’s Response Yes No Unknown Specialized Knowledge or Experience that is material to a REC in connection with the site. X Actual Knowledge of Environmental Liens or Activity Use Limitations (AULs) that may encumber the site. X Actual Knowledge of a Lower Purchase Price because contamination is known or believed to be present at the site. X Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information that is material to a REC in connection with the site. X Obvious Indicators of Contamination at the site.X Terracon’s consideration of the client provided information did not identify RECs. A copy of the questionnaire is included in Appendix C. 2.0 PHYSICAL SETTING Physical Setting Physical Setting Information Source Topography (Refer to Appendix A for an excerpt of the Topographic Map) Site Elevation Approximately 25 - 40 feet (NGVD) USGS Topographic Map, Casselberry, Florida, 7.5 minute series (Quadrangle), Date 1994 Surface Runoff/ Topographic Gradient The site and the surrounding properties slope towards the north-northeast. Closest Surface Water A stormwater pond is location on the northeast portion of the site. Soil Characteristics Soil Type EauGallie and Immokalee fine sands – 13 Brighton, Samsula, and Sanibel mucks – 17 Pomello fine sand– 27 St. Johns and EauGallie fine sands – 29 Tavares-Millhopper fine sands - 31 Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil Survey:http://websoilsu rvey.nrcs.usda.gov/appDescription EauGallie and Immokalee fine sands is on flatswoods or marine terraces. The parent material consists of Sandy and loamy marine deposits. Depth to the water is approximately 6 to 18 inches 318 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Winter Springs Site ■ Winter Springs, FL January 20, 2017 ■ Terracon Project No. H1177004 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 5 Physical Setting Information Source Brighton, Samsula, and Sanibel mucks is on depressions on marine terraces. The parent material consists of woody organic material. Depth to the water is approximately 0 inches Pomello sand is on flats or rises on marine terraces. The parent material consists of sandy marine deposits. Depth to the water is approximately 24 to 42 inches Tavares fine sand is on flats or ridges on marine terraces. The parent material consists of eolian or sandy marine deposits. Depth to the water is approximately 42 to 72 inches. Tavares-Millhopper fine sands is on knolls on marine terraces, ridges on marine terraces. The parent material consists of eolian or sandy marine deposits. Depth to the water is approximately 43 to 72 inches Geology/Hydrogeology Formation Undifferentiated Quaternary Sediments (Qu) Schmidt, Walter, Florida Geological Survey, Open File Report 80, Text to Accompany the Geological Map of Florida,2001 Description Undifferentiated Quaternary Sediments - Much of Florida’s surface is covered by a varying thickness of undifferentiated sediments consisting of siliciclastics, organics and freshwater carbonates. The siliciclastics are light gray, tan, brown to black, unconsolidated to poorly consolidated, clean to clayey, silty, unfossiliferous, variably organic- bearing sands to blue green to olive green, poorly to moderately consolidated, sandy, silty clays. Gravel is occasionally present in the panhandle. Organics occur as plant debris, roots, disseminated organic matrix and beds of peat. Estimated Depth to First Occurrence of Groundwater Approximately 9 to 10 feet bgs A Limited Site Investigation report for the site dated November 24, 2015, prepared by Terracon *Hydrogeologic Gradient A Site Assessment Report for Mobil-Winter Springs #73 facility adjoining south of the site, across State Road 434, prepared by CB&I dated July 30, 2013, groundwater was measured to southeast and east direction. * The groundwater flow direction and the depth to shallow, unconfined groundwater, if present, would likely vary depending upon seasonal variations in rainfall and other hydrogeological features. Without the benefit of on-site groundwater monitoring wells surveyed to a datum, groundwater depth and flow direction beneath the site cannot be directly ascertained. 319 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Winter Springs Site ■ Winter Springs, FL January 20, 2017 ■ Terracon Project No. H1177004 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 6 3.0 HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION Terracon reviewed the following historical sources to develop a history of the previous uses of the site and surrounding area, in order to help identify past uses for indications of RECs. Copies of selected historical documents are included in Appendix C. 3.1 Historical Topographic Maps, Aerial Photographs, Sanborn Maps Readily available historical USGS topographic maps, selected historical aerial photographs (at approximately 10 to 15 year intervals) and historical fire insurance maps produced by the Sanborn Map Company were reviewed to evaluate land development and obtain information concerning the history of development on and near the site. Reviewed historical topographic maps, aerial photographs and Sanborn Maps are summarized below. Historical fire insurance maps produced by the Sanborn Map Company were requested from EDR to evaluate past uses and relevant characteristics of the site and surrounding properties. EDR provided Sanborn maps as summarized below. n Topographic map: Casselberry, Florida Quadrangle, published in 1994 n Aerial photograph: PALMM, 1948, Digital PALMM, 1958, Digital PALMM, 1972, Digital FDOT, 1980, Digital FDOT, 1995, Digital Google Earth, 2008, Digital Google Earth, 2015, Digital Google Earth, 2016, Digital n Sanborn Fire Insurance Map(s): Not Available Historical Topographic Maps and Aerial Photographs Direction Description Site 1948, 1958, 1972, 1980, 1994, 1995: Undeveloped, partially wooded land with undeveloped roads throughout. Railroad through the western portion of the site. 2008:There appears to be disturbed soil along the eastern boundary of the site 2015, 2016:There appears to be a retention pond in the northeastern quadrant. North 1948, 1958, 1972, 1980, 1994, 1995: Undeveloped, partially wooded land with undeveloped roads throughout. Railroad through the northwestern portion. 2008, 2015, 2016: A road developed outside the northern boundary of the site. 320 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Winter Springs Site ■ Winter Springs, FL January 20, 2017 ■ Terracon Project No. H1177004 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 7 Direction Description East 1948, 1958, 1972, 1980, 1994, 1995: Undeveloped, partially wooded land with undeveloped roads throughout. 2008: to the north a road developed and continued east of the site. 2015, 2016: A road developed outside the eastern boundary of the site. A retention pond developed to the north of the eastern adjacent property. South 1948, 1958, 1972, 1980: An undeveloped road followed by wooded land and undeveloped roads throughout. Railroad through the southwestern portion. 1994,1995, 2008, 2015, 2016: A developed road that is now known as SR 434, a Mobile gasoline station, followed by wooded land. West 1948, 1958, 1972, 1980:An undeveloped road followed by what appears to be unmaintained citrus grove and undeveloped land. 1994, 1995:There appears to be a structure outside the southwestern boundary 2008, 2015, 2016:A developed road (Tuskawilla Drive) followed by a retail development with an associated parking area. 3.2 Historical City Directories The City Directory Comp city directories used in this study were made available through City Directory Source (selected years reviewed: 1968, 1972, 1977, 1982, 1987, 1992, 1995, 1999, 2003, 2008, 2013) and were reviewed at approximate five-year intervals, if readily available. Since these references are copyright protected, reproductions are not provided in this report. Street listings not available prior to 1968. The current street address for the site was identified as Northwest Corner of State Road 434 and Michael Blake Boulevard Historical City Directories Direction Description Site Historically undeveloped land North Historically undeveloped land East Historically undeveloped land South 1205 East State Road 434: No listing (1968, 1972, 1977, 1982, 1987, 1992, 1995), Mobile Oil Corp (1999, 2003) Exxon Mobile Oil Corp (2008, 2013) 321 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Winter Springs Site ■ Winter Springs, FL January 20, 2017 ■ Terracon Project No. H1177004 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 8 Direction Description West 1170 Tree Swallow Drive: No Listing (1968, 1972, 1977, 1982, 1987, 1992, 1995, 1999, 2003) abs services inc, chin 2 llc, devco foods inc, dhl auto brokers inc, elite options, great food concepts 03 llc, hoggy boss entertainment inc, impact food group llc, microshield environmental services l, sigma networks inc, the ups store (2008, 2013) 1200 East State Road 434: No Listing (1968, 1972, 1977, 1982, 1987, 1992, 1995, 1999, 2003) McDonalds Restaurants (2008, 2013) 150 Tuskawilla Road: No Listing (1968, 1972, 1977, 1982, 1987, 1992, 1995, 1999) Laverne Kingsbury (2003, 2008) C. Kingsbury (2013) 154 Tuskawilla Road: No Listing (1968, 1972, 1977, 1982, 1987, 1992, 1995, 1999, 2003, 2008) Amanda Mudlock, Chris Chaffin, Christopher Kintner, Emily Mcloughlin, Gregory Stone, Horace Esclavon, Richard Warrick, Tracy Osullivan (2013) 156 Tuskawilla Road: No Listing (1968, 1972, 1977, 1982, 1987, 1992, 1995, 1999, 2003) Box Office Hair Productions (2008) Birchell Insurance, Box Office Hair Productions, Mango Spice Eatery & Pub (2013) 3.3 Site Ownership Based on a review of information obtained from the Seminole County Property Appraiser’s records, the site consists of one parcel (Seminole County Property Appraiser parcel 26-20-30- 5AR-0A00-006C) totaling approximately 17.37 acres of land. The current site owner for the site was identified as Winter Springs Holdings Inc. 3.4 Title Search At the direction of the client, a title search was not included as part of the scope of services. Unless notified otherwise, we assume that the client is evaluating this information outside the scope of this report. 3.5 Environmental Liens and Activity and Use Limitations Environmental lien and activity and use limitation records recorded against the site were not provided by the client. At the direction of the client, performance of a review of these records was not included as part of the scope of services and unless notified otherwise, we assume that the client is evaluating this information outside the scope of this report. 3.6 Interviews Regarding Current and Historical Site Uses Terracon attempted to contact the current owner, Winter Springs Holdings Inc, and the previous owners, Main Street Associates LLC, Schrimsher Land Fund V Ltd, Schrimsher Land Fund 1986 II Ltd, Schrimsher Land Fund VI Ltd, Schrimsher Inc and Schrimsher Land Fund 1985 Ltd, 322 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Winter Springs Site ■ Winter Springs, FL January 20, 2017 ■ Terracon Project No. H1177004 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 9 identified on the Seminole County Property Appraiser website; however, contact information was not identified through Whitepages.com. 3.7 Prior Report Review A previous Phase I Environmental Site Assessment report for the site dated October 28, 2015, was prepared by Terracon (Project No. H1157294). The report indicated that RECs were identified associated with the southwestern-adjoining and up-gradient Mobile gasoline station is still undergoing monitoring from a petroleum spill in 1993 and evidence on-site of a Historical Railroad. Potential historic application and releases of arsenic in connection with the historical railroad. The report recommended subsurface investigation for potential arsenic impacts in the shallow soils associated with the former railroad is recommended. Additionally, assessment of the groundwater along the southern boundary of the site should occur to determine if any petroleum impacted groundwater has migrated from the Mobile gasoline station onto the site. A Limited Site Investigation report for the site dated November 24, 2015, prepared by Terracon (Project No. H1157294). Soil and groundwater samples were collected to evaluate the identified RECs in the Phase I ESA report dated October 28, 2015. Groundwater was encountered approximately 9 to 10 feet bgs. Analytical results of contaminant of concerns in soil and groundwater samples did not exceed Florida’s cleanup target levels. The report indicated that based on the results of the investigation additional assessment of the RECs identified in the previous Phase I ESA at the site does not appear warranted. 4.0 RECORDS REVIEW Regulatory database information was provided by EDR, a contract information services company. The purpose of the records review was to identify RECs in connection with the site. Information in this section is subject to the accuracy of the data provided by the information services company and the date at which the information is updated, and the scope herein did not include confirmation of facilities listed as "unmappable" by regulatory databases. In some of the following subsections, the words up-gradient, cross-gradient and down-gradient refer to the topographic gradient in relation to the site. As stated previously, the groundwater flow direction and the depth to shallow groundwater, if present, would likely vary depending upon seasonal variations in rainfall and the depth to the soil/bedrock interface. Without the benefit of on-site groundwater monitoring wells surveyed to a datum, groundwater depth and flow direction beneath the site cannot be directly ascertained. 4.1 Federal and State/Tribal Databases Listed below are the facility listings identified on federal and state/tribal databases within the ASTM-required search distances from the approximate site boundaries. Database definition, descriptions, and the database search report are included in Appendix D. 323 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Winter Springs Site ■ Winter Springs, FL January 20, 2017 ■ Terracon Project No. H1177004 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 10 Federal Databases Database Description Distance (miles)Listings CERCLIS Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, & Liability Information System 0.5 0 CERCLIS / NFRAP Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, & Liability Information System/No Further Remedial Action Planned 0.5 0 ERNS Emergency Response Notification System Site 0 IC / EC Institutional Control/Engineering Control Site 0 NPL National Priorities List 1 0 NPL (Delisted) National Priorities Delisted List 0.5 0 RCRA CORRACTS/ TSD RCRA Corrective Action Activity 1 0 RCRA Generators Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Site and adjoining properties 0 RCRA Non- CORRACTS/ TSD RCRA Non-Corrective Action Activity 0.5 0 State/Tribal Databases Database Description Distance (miles)Listings Brownfields Brownfields Areas 0.5 3 IC/EC Institutional Controls / Engineering Controls Site 0 LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks 0.5 3 SHWS State Hazardous Waste Site 0.5 0 SWF/LF Solid Waste Facilities/Landfills 0.5 1 UST Underground Storage Tanks Site and adjoining properties 1 VCP Voluntary Cleanup Program 0.5 0 In addition to the above ASTM-required listings, Terracon reviewed other federal, state, local, and proprietary databases provided by the database firm. A list of the additional reviewed databases is included in the regulatory database report included in Appendix D. 324 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Winter Springs Site ■ Winter Springs, FL January 20, 2017 ■ Terracon Project No. H1177004 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 11 The following table summarizes the site-specific information provided by the database and/or gathered by this office for identified facilities.Facilities are listed in order of proximity to the site. Additional discussion for selected facilities follows the summary table. Listed Facilities Facility Name And Location Estimated Distance / Direction/Gradient Database Listings Is a REC, CREC, or HREC to the Site Town Center S.E.E.D. / Brownfield Site BROWNFIELDS Not a REC base on file review Mobil-Winter Springs #731 (aka Mobil Oil Corp Ss #Q8m 1205 E State Road 434 Adjoining/west/up-gradient LUST, UST, EDR Hist Auto Not a REC at this time based on analytical results of groundwater assessment at the site on November 24, 2015 1212 E. Sr 434 Debris Staging Area 1212 E. Sr 434 Adjoining/southeast/down- gradient SWF/LF Not a REC based on the lack of documented violations Foreign Car Parts Service 1207 E State Road 434 Approximately 170 feet/southwest/cross-gradient ECHO, FINDS, RCRA NonGen / NLR, Not a REC based on the lack of documented violations Handy Way Food Store #3333 170 Tuscawilla Rd Approximately 300 feet/west/up-gradient Financial Assurance, LUST, UST Not a REC based on regulatory cleanup completion status Boykin Kolberg Portable Crusher 2950 Railroad Ave Approximately 1,200 feet/south/cross-gradient AIRS, BROWNFIELDS Not a REC based on distance Former Central Florida Drum Facility Approximately 1,200 feet/south/cross-gradient BROWNFIELDS Not a REC based on distance Winter Springs City-City Hall 1126 E Hwy 434 Approximately 1,700 feet/northwest/cross-gradient AST, Financial Assurance, LUST, NPDES, UST Not a REC based on distance Town Center S.E.E.D. / Brownfield On August 25, 2008 the following resolution was approved, NO. 2008-36. The City of Winter Springs designated the current site as part of the Seminole Economic Enhancement District / Brownfield areas for the purpose of Environmental Remediation, rehabilitation and economic 325 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Winter Springs Site ■ Winter Springs, FL January 20, 2017 ■ Terracon Project No. H1177004 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 12 redevelopment (“Brownfield Area”). The resolution letter along with a site map will be located in Appendices C Mobil-Winter Springs #731 Mobil-Winter Springs #73, LUST, UST and EDR Hist Auto facility, adjoins south of the site, across State Road 434. According to the EDR report, a petroleum discharge dated April 26, 1993, was determined eligible for Florida’s Petroleum Liability and Restoration Insurance Program (PLRIP). A Limited Closure Summary Report prepared by Groundwater & Environmental Services, Inc. dated December 11, 2008, benzene was detected at concentration exceeding Florida’s leachability based SCTL, but below commercial SCTL. A Site Assessment Report prepared by CB&I dated July 30, 2013, benzene and naphthalene were detected at concentrations exceeding Florida’s GCTLs, and groundwater was measured to southeast and east direction, toward the site. A Storage Tank Facility Annual Compliance Site Inspection Report prepared by the FDEP dated December 19, 2016, indicated that the facility was minor out of compliance due to the lack of records for a review and the lack of testing of release detection device. Additional information associated with assessment was not identified on OCULUS website. However, based on analytical results of groundwater assessment at the site on November 24, 2015, the facility does not represent a REC at this time. The remaining facilities listed in the database report do not appear to represent RECs to the site at this time based upon regulatory status, apparent topographic gradient, and/or distance from the site. Unmapped facilities are those that do not contain sufficient address or location information to evaluate the facility listing locations relative to the site. The report did not list facilities in the unmapped section. 4.2 Local Agency Inquiries Agency Contacted/ Contact Method Response Seminole County Health Department /email Ms. Nancy Smith with the Seminole County Health Department indicated that no records were identified associated with the site. The FDEP Central District, Public Records Section / email Ms. Amanda Ades indicated that information associated with the site and adjoining facilities can be found on the FDEP’s website OCULUS and is further discussed in Section 4.1. Building Permits / Seminole County Property Appraiser’s website Review of the building permits available on the Seminole County Property Appraiser’s website did not identified any building permits of environmental significance related to the site. Seminole County Fire Department / email At the issuance of this report, a response had not been received from the Seminole County Fire Department. 326 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Winter Springs Site ■ Winter Springs, FL January 20, 2017 ■ Terracon Project No. H1177004 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 13 Agency Contacted/ Contact Method Response The City of Winter Springs Planning and Land Development Division / website According to the information available on the City of Winter Springs Planning and Land Development Division website, the site is zoned as Town Center District (T-C). 4.3 Local Area Knowledge Terracon reviewed the Groundwater Contamination Area layer for Ethylene Dibromide (EDB) Application Zone Delineation and Brownfields area available at the FDEP’s Map Direct website. Ethylene dibromide was formerly used in citrus grove applications as a fumigant against nematodes. The site location was not identified in a known EDB Groundwater Contamination Area. However; the site was located within a Brownfields area. A copy of the EDB/ Brownfields map is contained in Appendix C. 5.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE 5.1 General Site Information Information contained in this section is based on a visual reconnaissance conducted while walking through the site and the accessible interior areas of structures, if any, located on the site. Exhibit 2 in Appendix A is a Site Diagram of the site. Photo documentation of the site at the time of the visual reconnaissance is provided in Appendix B. Credentials of the individuals planning and conducting the site visit are included in Appendix E. General Site Information Site Reconnaissance Field Personnel Natthaphon Prapinpongsanone Reconnaissance Date January 17, 2017 Weather Conditions 70 Fahrenheit Site Contact/Title None 5.2 Overview of Current Site Occupants and Operations The site is located on the northwest corner of State Road 434 and Michael Blake Boulevard, Winter Springs, Florida and consists of one undeveloped parcel (Seminole County Parcel Number 26-20-30-5AR-0A00-006C) a 17.37 acre tract of undeveloped land. 327 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Winter Springs Site ■ Winter Springs, FL January 20, 2017 ■ Terracon Project No. H1177004 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 14 5.3 Site Observations The following table summarizes site observations and interviews. Affirmative responses (designated by an “X”) are discussed in more detail following the table. Site Characteristics Category Item or Feature Observed or Identified Site Operations, Processes, and Equipment Emergency generators Elevators Air compressors Hydraulic lifts Dry cleaning Photo processing Ventilation hoods and/or incinerators Waste treatment systems and/or water treatment systems Heating and/or cooling systems Paint booths Sub-grade mechanic pits Wash-down areas or carwashes Vehicle repair or maintenance Pesticide/herbicide production or storage Printing operations Metal finishing (e.g., electroplating, chrome plating, galvanizing, etc.) Salvage operations Oil, gas or mineral production Other processes or equipment Aboveground Chemical or Waste Storage Aboveground storage tanks Drums, barrels and/or containers ‡ 5 gallons MSDS or SDS Underground Chemical or Waste Storage, Drainage or Collection Systems Underground storage tanks or ancillary UST equipment Sumps, cisterns, French drains, catch basins and/or dry wells Grease traps Septic tanks and/or leach fields 328 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Winter Springs Site ■ Winter Springs, FL January 20, 2017 ■ Terracon Project No. H1177004 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 15 Category Item or Feature Observed or Identified Oil/water separators, clarifiers, sand traps, triple traps, interceptors Pipeline markers Interior floor drains Electrical Transformers/ PCBs Transformers and/or capacitors Other equipment Releases or Potential Releases Stressed vegetation Stained soil Stained pavement or similar surface Leachate and/or waste seeps Trash, debris and/or other waste materials X Dumping or disposal areas Construction/demolition debris and/or dumped fill dirt Surface water discoloration, odor, sheen, and/or free floating product Strong, pungent or noxious odors Exterior pipe discharges and/or other effluent discharges Other Notable Site Features Surface water bodies X Quarries or pits Wastewater lagoons Wells Releases or Potential Releases Trash, debris and/or other waste materials Debris consisted of plastics and paper were observed on the northwest and the southeast portion of the site, and waste tires were observed on the northwest portion of the site during the site reconnaissance. Based upon visual observation of surface materials, the debris did not appear to be hazardous in nature. A solid waste disposal dumpster was observed on the west portion of the site. Evidence of staining, noxious odors or hazardous waste disposal was not observed in the vicinity of the on- site dumpster. 329 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Winter Springs Site ■ Winter Springs, FL January 20, 2017 ■ Terracon Project No. H1177004 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 16 Other Notable Site Features Surface water bodies A stormwater pond was observed on the northeast portion of the site. A pond was observed on the southwest portion of the site. Indications of chemical sheens, discoloration or unusual odors were not observed at the surface of the water. 6.0 ADJOINING PROPERTY RECONNAISSANCE Visual observations of adjoining properties (from site boundaries) are summarized below. Adjoining Properties Direction Description North Cross Seminole Trail and wooded land East Michael Blake Boulevard followed by wooded land and a stormwater pond South State Road 434 followed by wooded and Mobil gasoline station West McDonalds followed by Tuskawilla Road and Winter Springs Town Center Indications of RECs were not observed with the adjoining properties. 7.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES Per the agreed scope of services specified in the proposal, additional services (e.g. asbestos sampling, lead-based paint sampling, wetlands evaluation, lead in drinking water testing, radon testing, vapor encroachment screening, etc.) were not conducted. 8.0 DECLARATION I, Mark W. Mulligan, declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in Section 312.10 of 40 CFR 312; and I have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the site. I have developed and performed the All Appropriate Inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. __________________________ Mark W. Mulligan Department Manager II-Professional 330 APPENDIX A EXHIBIT 1 – TOPOGRAPHIC MAP EXHIBIT 2 – SITE DIAGRAM 331 NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929 CONTOUR INTERVAL 5 FEET SECTION: TOWNSHIP: RANGE: Drawn By: Checked By: Approved By: Project Mngr: File No. Date: Scale: Project No.EXHIBITTOPOGRAPHIC VICINITY MAP 1 1000090008000 1 6000 1000 0 5000 7000 2000 2 4000 0 0 3000 .5 1000 1 1000 0 2000 .5 1000 1 KILOMETERS MILES FEET SCALE 1:24 000 7.5 MINUTE SERIES (QUADRANGLE) 1994 CASSELBERRY, FLORIDA N CS MG CS MM H1157294 AS SHOWN H1157294 10-26-15 A-1WINTER SPRINGS SITE NW CORNER SR 434 AND MICHAEL BLAKE BOULEVARD WINTER SPRINGS, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA 6 20 AND 21 31 EAST Consulting Engineers and Scientists 1675 LEE ROAD WINTER PARK, FLORIDA 32789 FAX. (407) 740-6112PH. (407) 740-6110 S IT E ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT LAKE JESUP STATE ROAD 434 TUSKAWILLAROADH1177024 H1177024 NP NP NP NP 1-18-17 332 Drawn By: Checked By: Approved By: Project Mngr: File No. Date: Scale: Project No.EXHIBITSITE DIAGRAMCS MG CS MM H1157294 AS SHOWN H1157294 10-26-15 2WINTER SPRINGS SITE NW CORNER SR 434 AND MICHAEL BLAKE BOULEVARD WINTER SPRINGS, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA Consulting Engineers and Scientists 1675 LEE ROAD WINTER PARK, FLORIDA 32789 FAX. (407) 740-6112PH. (407) 740-6110 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT N LEGEND SITE BOUNDARY WOODED WOODED STORMWATER PONDSTORMWATER POND BIK E T RAIL BIKETRAILTUSKAWILLAROADS T A T E R O A D 4 3 4 MOBILE GAS STATIONM CDONALDSPONDWOODED WOODED WOODED WINTER SPRINGS TOWN CENTER PINCHAPENNEY WOODED WOODEDBIKET RAILNP NP NP NP H1177024 NP NP NP NP D 333 Appendix D 334 ENVIRONMENTAL DATABASE SEARCH 335 FORM-LBC-GON ®kcehCoeG htiw tropeR ™paM suidaR RDE ehT 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com NEC SR 434 and Tuscawilla Road NEC SR 434 and Tuscawilla Road Winter Springs, FL 32708 Inquiry Number: 05335716.2r June 18, 2018 336 SECTION PAGE Executive Summary ES1 Overview Map 2 Detail Map 3 Map Findings Summary 4 Map Findings 8 Orphan Summary 47 Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1 Physical Setting Source Summary A-2 Physical Setting Source Map A-8 Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-9 Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1 TC05335716.2r Page 1 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2018 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TABLE OF CONTENTS 337 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC05335716.2r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR). The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS NEC SR 434 AND TUSCAWILLA ROAD WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708 COORDINATES 28.6964940 - 28˚ 41’ 47.37’’Latitude (North): 81.2615580 - 81˚ 15’ 41.60’’Longitude (West): Zone 17Universal Tranverse Mercator: 474449.7UTM X (Meters): 3174213.8UTM Y (Meters): 41 ft. above sea levelElevation: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY 5656107 CASSELBERRY, FLTarget Property Map: 2012Version Date: 5656135 OVIEDO, FLEast Map: 2012Version Date: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT 20151017, 20150806Portions of Photo from: USDASource: 338 05335716.2r Page 2 13 WINTER SPRINGS CITY- 1126 E HWY 434 LUST, UST, AST, Financial Assurance Higher 2586, 0.490, NW 12 VACANT CHURCH AND WA 395 TUSKAWILLA RD. & SWF/LF, ASBESTOS Higher 2467, 0.467, SSW 11 FORMER CENTRAL FLORI 2950 (M-1 ZONING ARE BROWNFIELDS, AIRS, ASBESTOS Lower 1709, 0.324, South C10 WINTER SPRINGS HIGH 130 TUSKAWILLA RD RCRA-CESQG Lower 1308, 0.248, NNE C9 WINTER SPRINGS HIGH 130 TUSKAWILLA RD AST Lower 1308, 0.248, NNE 8 PUBLIX SUPER MARKET 1160 E SR 434 AST Higher 1131, 0.214, NW 7 SCRIMSHER PARCEL E SR 434 RESP PARTY Lower 912, 0.173, SSE 6 HANDY WAY FOOD STORE 170 TUSCAWILLA RD LUST, UST, Financial Assurance Higher 545, 0.103, West B5 MOBIL OIL CORP SS #Q 1205 E SR 434 RCRA NonGen / NLR, FINDS, ECHO Higher 173, 0.033, SW B4 MOBIL-WINTER SPRINGS 1205 E STATE ROAD 43 LUST, UST, CLEANUP SITES, DWM CONTAM, Financial... Higher 173, 0.033, SW B3 EXXON MOBIL CORPORAT 1205 E STATE ROAD 43 EDR Hist Auto Higher 173, 0.033, SW A2 FOREIGN CAR PARTS SE 1207 E STATE ROAD 43 RCRA NonGen / NLR, FINDS, ECHO Higher 156, 0.030, SW A1 1212 E. SR 434 DEBRI 1212 E. SR 434 SWF/LF Lower 140, 0.027, SSE Reg FORMER CENTRAL FLORI BROWNFIELDS Same 1795, 0.340, SSE Reg TOWN CENTER S.E.E.D. BROWNFIELDS Same 1 ft. MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: NEC SR 434 AND TUSCAWILLA ROAD WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS 339 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC05335716.2r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR. DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases: STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL National Priority List Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions Federal CERCLIS list FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS Corrective Action Report Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRA-SQG RCRA - Small Quantity Generators Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS Land Use Control Information System US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List US INST CONTROL Sites with Institutional Controls 340 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC05335716.2r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 Federal ERNS list ERNS Emergency Response Notification System State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS SHWS Florida’s State-Funded Action Sites State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LAST Leaking Aboveground Storage Tank Listing INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land State and tribal registered storage tank lists FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing FF TANKS Federal Facilities Listing INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land TANKS Storage Tank Facility List State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries ENG CONTROLS Institutional Controls Registry INST CONTROL Institutional Controls Registry State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing VCP Voluntary Cleanup Sites ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites SWRCY Recycling Centers INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations ODI Open Dump Inventory IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register PRIORITYCLEANERS Priority Ranking List Fl Sites Sites List US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register Local Land Records LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information 341 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC05335716.2r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System SPILLS Oil and Hazardous Materials Incidents SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch SPILLS 80 SPILLS 80 data from FirstSearch Other Ascertainable Records FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites DOD Department of Defense Sites SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST 2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems ROD Records Of Decision RMP Risk Management Plans RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System PRP Potentially Responsible Parties PADS PCB Activity Database System ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database RADINFO Radiation Information Database HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem US MINES Mines Master Index File ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing ECHO Enforcement & Compliance History Information FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing AIRS Permitted Facilities Listing ASBESTOS ASBESTOS CLEANUP SITES DEP Cleanup Sites - Contamination Locator Map Listing DEDB Ethylene Dibromide Database Results DRYCLEANERS Drycleaning Facilities Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing FL Cattle Dip. Vats Cattle Dipping Vats SITE INV SITES Site Investigation Section Sites Listing 342 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC05335716.2r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 TIER 2 Tier 2 Facility Listing UIC Underground Injection Wells Database Listing NPDES Wastewater Facility Regulation Database EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants EDR Hist Cleaner EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA HWS Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases. Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property. Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-CESQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-CESQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/11/2017 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA-CESQG site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ WINTER SPRINGS HIGH 130 TUSKAWILLA RD NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.248 mi.) C10 33 343 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC05335716.2r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF: The Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills in a particular state. The data come from the Department of Environmental Protection’s Facility Directory (Solid Waste Facilities). A review of the SWF/LF list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 2 SWF/LF sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ VACANT CHURCH AND WA 395 TUSKAWILLA RD. & SSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.467 mi.) 12 37 Database: SWF/LF, Date of Government Version: 04/16/2018 Class Status: INACTIVE (I) Facility-Site Id: 104855 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ 1212 E. SR 434 DEBRI 1212 E. SR 434 SSE 0 - 1/8 (0.027 mi.) A1 8 Database: SWF/LF, Date of Government Version: 04/16/2018 Class Status: INACTIVE (I) Facility-Site Id: 98367 State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST: The Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. The data come from the Department of Environmental Protection’s PCTO1--Petroleum Contamination Detail Report. A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/09/2018 has revealed that there are 3 LUST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ MOBIL-WINTER SPRINGS 1205 E STATE ROAD 43 SW 0 - 1/8 (0.033 mi.) B4 11 Discharge Cleanup Status: RA - RA ONGOING Facility Status: OPEN Facility-Site Id: 9045623 HANDY WAY FOOD STORE 170 TUSCAWILLA RD W 0 - 1/8 (0.103 mi.) 6 24 Discharge Cleanup Status: NFA - NFA COMPLETE Facility Status: CLOSED Facility-Site Id: 8516641 WINTER SPRINGS CITY- 1126 E HWY 434 NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.490 mi.) 13 38 Discharge Cleanup Status: NFA - NFA COMPLETE Facility Status: OPEN Facility-Site Id: 8731664 344 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC05335716.2r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 State and tribal registered storage tank lists UST: The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered USTs. Shortly after the September 11 event, the DEP was instructed to remove the detail about some of the storage tank facilities in the state from their reports. Federal-owned facilities and bulk storage facilities are included in that set. A review of the UST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 2 UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ MOBIL-WINTER SPRINGS 1205 E STATE ROAD 43 SW 0 - 1/8 (0.033 mi.) B4 11 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 04/09/2018 Tank Status: B Tank Status: U Facility-Site Id: 9045623 Facility Status: OPEN HANDY WAY FOOD STORE 170 TUSCAWILLA RD W 0 - 1/8 (0.103 mi.) 6 24 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 04/09/2018 Tank Status: B Facility-Site Id: 8516641 Facility Status: CLOSED AST: Shortly after the Sept 11 event, the DEP was instructed to remove the detail about some of the storage tank facilities in the state from their reports. Federal-owned facilities and bulk storage facilities are included in that set. A review of the AST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 2 AST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ PUBLIX SUPER MARKET 1160 E SR 434 NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.214 mi.) 8 31 Database: AST, Date of Government Version: 04/09/2018 Facility-Site Id: 9809815 Facility Status: OPEN Facility Status: OPEN PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ WINTER SPRINGS HIGH 130 TUSKAWILLA RD NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.248 mi.) C9 32 Database: AST, Date of Government Version: 04/09/2018 Facility-Site Id: 9813093 Facility Status: OPEN Facility Status: OPEN State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields are defined by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) as abandoned, idled, or underused industrial and commercial facilities where expansion or redevelopment is complicated by real or perceived environmental contamination. A review of the BROWNFIELDS list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 3 BROWNFIELDS sites 345 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC05335716.2r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ TOWN CENTER S.E.E.D. 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) 0 8 Database: BROWNFIELDS AREAS, Date of Government Version: 02/28/2018 FORMER CENTRAL FLORI SSE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.340 mi.) 0 8 Database: BROWNFIELDS AREAS, Date of Government Version: 02/28/2018 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ FORMER CENTRAL FLORI 2950 (M-1 ZONING ARE S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.324 mi.) 11 35 Database: BROWNFIELDS, Date of Government Version: 02/25/2018 Database: BSRA, Date of Government Version: 02/21/2018 Site Id: BF590702001 Facility-Site Id: BF590702000 Site Id: BF590702001 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. A review of the RCRA NonGen / NLR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/11/2017 has revealed that there are 2 RCRA NonGen / NLR sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ FOREIGN CAR PARTS SE 1207 E STATE ROAD 43 SW 0 - 1/8 (0.030 mi.) A2 9 MOBIL OIL CORP SS #Q 1205 E SR 434 SW 0 - 1/8 (0.033 mi.) B5 21 DWM CONTAM: A listing of active or known sites. The listing includes sites that need cleanup but are not actively being working on because the agency currently does not have funding (primarily petroleum and drycleaning). A review of the DWM CONTAM list, as provided by EDR, and dated 09/30/2017 has revealed that there is 1 DWM CONTAM site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ MOBIL-WINTER SPRINGS 1205 E STATE ROAD 43 SW 0 - 1/8 (0.033 mi.) B4 11 Program Site Id: 9045623 346 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC05335716.2r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10 RESP PARTY: Open, inactive and closed responsible party sites A review of the RESP PARTY list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/02/2018 has revealed that there is 1 RESP PARTY site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SCRIMSHER PARCEL E SR 434 SSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.173 mi.) 7 30 Site Status: CLOSED EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR Hist Auto: EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. A review of the EDR Hist Auto list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 EDR Hist Auto site within approximately 0.125 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ EXXON MOBIL CORPORAT 1205 E STATE ROAD 43 SW 0 - 1/8 (0.033 mi.) B3 10 347 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC05335716.2r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11 There were no unmapped sites in this report. 348 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.404040404040 404 0 349 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.4040350 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Proposed NPL 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNPL LIENS Federal Delisted NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Delisted NPL Federal CERCLIS list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500FEDERAL FACILITY 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS-ARCHIVE Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CORRACTS Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500RCRA-TSDF Federal RCRA generators list 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-LQG 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-SQG 1 NR NR NR 1 0 0.250RCRA-CESQG Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUCIS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US ENG CONTROLS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US INST CONTROL Federal ERNS list 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPERNS State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000SHWS State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists 2 NR NR 1 0 1 0.500SWF/LF State and tribal leaking storage tank lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LAST 3 NR NR 1 0 2 0.500LUST 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN LUST State and tribal registered storage tank lists 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FEMA UST TC05335716.2r Page 4 351 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FF TANKS 2 NR NR NR 0 2 0.250UST 2 NR NR NR 2 0 0.250AST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250INDIAN UST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250TANKS State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ENG CONTROLS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INST CONTROL State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN VCP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500VCP State and tribal Brownfields sites 3 NR NR 2 0 1 0.500BROWNFIELDS ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US BROWNFIELDS Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWRCY 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS REGION 9 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500IHS OPEN DUMPS Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS HIST CDL 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500PRIORITYCLEANERS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Fl Sites 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS CDL Local Land Records 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLIENS 2 Records of Emergency Release Reports 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHMIRS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSPILLS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSPILLS 90 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSPILLS 80 Other Ascertainable Records 2 NR NR NR 0 2 0.250RCRA NonGen / NLR 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUDS TC05335716.2r Page 5 352 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000DOD 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS FIN ASSUR 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPEPA WATCH LIST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.2502020 COR ACTION 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTSCA 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTRIS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSSTS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000ROD 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRMP 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRAATS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPRP 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPADS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPICIS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFTTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPMLTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCOAL ASH DOE 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH EPA 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPCB TRANSFORMER 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRADINFO 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHIST FTTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPDOT OPS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CONSENT 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000INDIAN RESERV 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUSRAP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500UMTRA 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLEAD SMELTERS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS AIRS 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250US MINES 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250ABANDONED MINES 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFINDS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000UXO 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPDOCKET HWC 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPECHO 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FUELS PROGRAM 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPAIRS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPASBESTOS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCLEANUP SITES 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250DEDB 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250DRYCLEANERS 1 NR NR 0 0 1 0.500DWM CONTAM 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFinancial Assurance 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FL Cattle Dip. Vats 1 NR NR 0 1 0 0.500RESP PARTY 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SITE INV SITES 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTIER 2 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUIC 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNPDES EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000EDR MGP TC05335716.2r Page 6 353 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 1 NR NR NR NR 1 0.125EDR Hist Auto 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Cleaner EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA HWS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA LF 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA LUST 18 0 0 4 4 10 0- Totals -- NOTES: TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database TC05335716.2r Page 7 354 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 524645.886YCoord: 666787.081XCoord: 2220603.49Area: PAPERMethod: 237Object Id: CITY OF WINTER SPRINGSSource: 09/04/2008Resolution Date: 2008-36Resolution: 2220603.5Acreage: CENTRALDistrict: BF590803000Area id: BROWNFIELDS AREAS: 1 ft. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FL < 1/8 N/A BROWNFIELDSTOWN CENTER S.E.E.D. / BROWNFIELD S109353651 523359.9865YCoord: 667230.890XCoord: 24923.4045Area: PAPERMethod: 239Object Id: Seminole CountySource: 12/11/2007Resolution Date: 2007-R-233Resolution: 6.15871Acreage: CentralDistrict: BF590702000Area id: BROWNFIELDS AREAS: 1795 ft. WINTER SPRINGS, FL 1/4-1/2 N/A SSE BROWNFIELDSFORMER CENTRAL FLORIDA DRUM FACILITY S108946006 Not reportedSite Supervisor Addr: Not reportedSite Supervisor Name: Not reportedEMail Address2: Not reportedEMail Address1: Not reportedResponsible Authority Phone: Not reportedResponsible Authority City,St,Zip: Not reportedResponsible Authority Address: Not reportedResponsible Authority Name: Not reportedRange: Not reportedTownship: Not reportedSection: INACTIVE (I)Class Status: DISASTER DEBRIS MANAGEMENT SITEClassification: 910Class Type: 28:41:41 / 81:15:35Lat/Long: CDDistrict: 98367Facility ID: SWF/LF: 140 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster A 0.027 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 40 ft. < 1/8 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708 SSE 1212 E. SR 434 N/A A1 SWF/LF1212 E. SR 434 DEBRIS STAGING AREA S109689106 TC05335716.2r Page 8 355 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Click here for Florida Oculus: Not reportedLand Owner Telephone: Not reportedLand Owner City/State/Zip: Not reportedLand Owner Address: Not reportedLand Owner Name: Not reportedSite Supervisor Telephone: Not reportedSite Supervisor City/State/Zip: 1212 E. SR 434 DEBRIS STAGING AREA (Continued) S109689106 NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 09/25/2000Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708 1207 E STATE ROAD 434Owner/operator address: WAYNE NORMANOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: Handler: Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous wasteDescription: Non-GeneratorClassification: 04EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: 305-699-4505Contact telephone: USContact country: WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708-2811 E STATE ROAD 434Contact address: WAYNE NORMANContact: WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708-2811 E STATE ROAD 434Mailing address: FLD981748007EPA ID: WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708-2811 1207 E STATE ROAD 434Facility address: FOREIGN CAR PARTS SERVICEFacility name: 10/19/2012Date form received by agency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 156 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster A 0.030 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 44 ft. < 1/8 ECHOWINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708 SW FINDS1207 E STATE ROAD 434 FLD981748007 A2 RCRA NonGen / NLRFOREIGN CAR PARTS SERVICE 1000202983 TC05335716.2r Page 9 356 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110005991579DFR URL: 110005991579Registry ID: 1000202983Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access affiliation data for the State of Florida. Maintenance (FDM) system maintains entity, environmental interest and Florida Environmental System Today Application (FIESTA) Data corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110005991579Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: FOREIGN CAR PARTS SERVICESite name: 01/14/1987Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: FOREIGN CAR PARTS SERVICE (Continued) 1000202983 Gasoline Service Stations, NEC2009 EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION Gasoline Service Stations, NEC2008 EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION Gasoline Service Stations, NEC2007 EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION Gasoline Service Stations, NEC2006 EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION Gasoline Service Stations, NEC2005 EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION Gasoline Service Stations2004 EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION Gasoline Service Stations2003 EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION Gasoline Service Stations2002 EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION Gasoline Service Stations1999 MOBILE ORLANDO JAWAD INC Type:Year: Name: EDR Hist Auto 173 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster B 0.033 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 43 ft. < 1/8 WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708 SW 1205 E STATE ROAD 434 N/A B3 EDR Hist AutoEXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 1020699800 TC05335716.2r Page 10 357 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Gasoline Service Stations, NEC2014 EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION Gasoline Service Stations, NEC2013 EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION Gasoline Service Stations, NEC2012 EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION Gasoline Service Stations, NEC2011 EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION Gasoline Service Stations, NEC2010 EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION (Continued) 1020699800 05/10/2013Disch Cleanup Status Date: RA - RA ONGOINGDischarge Cleanup Status: R - CLEANUP REQUIREDCleanup Required: Not reportedPCT Discharge Combined: 04/26/1993Discharge Date: Discharge Cleanup Summary: 211RP Extension: 1110RP Zip: 10/28/2013RP Begin Date: ACCOUNT OWNERPrimary RP Role: 922Related Party ID: 29-FEB-08Score Effective Date: 46Score: 32708, 5186Zip: FLState: NBad Address Ind: (813)681-4279Phone: BRANDON, FL 33509Contact City/State/Zip: PO BOX 1110Contact Address: AUTOMATED PETROLEUM & ENERGY CO INC (APEC)Contact Company: RICK HERWEH | PHY ADDRESS: 1201 OAKFIELD DR #109Contact: ONGO - ONGOINGFacility Cleanup Status: Petroleum Cleanup PCT Facility Score: 04/11/2011Address Update: 10/28/2013Name Update: RICK HERWEHOperator: 30Score When Ranked: 02/29/2008Score Effective Date: 46Score: 0Datum: DPHOMethod: Not reportedFeature: 31ERange: 20STownship: 031Section: 28 41 44.6788 / 81 15 43.9905Lat/Long (dms): Central DistrictDistrict: 4871Facility Cleanup Rank: (813)681-4279Facility Phone: A - Retail StationFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: 9045623Facility Id: STATERegion: LUST: 173 ft.Financial AssuranceSite 2 of 3 in cluster B 0.033 mi.DWM CONTAM Relative: Higher Actual: 43 ft. < 1/8 CLEANUP SITESWINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708 SW UST1205 E STATE ROAD 434 N/A B4 LUSTMOBIL-WINTER SPRINGS #731 U004130541 TC05335716.2r Page 11 358 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 9045623Facility ID: CDDistrict: Task Information: 25Gallons Discharged: Not reportedPollutant Other Description: B - Unleaded GasPollutant: NoContaminated Ground Water: NoContaminated Surface Water: NoContaminated Soil: YesContaminated Monitoring Well: 0Contaminated Drinking Wells: PCLP48 - ORANGE COUNTY ENVIRONTank Office: Not reportedSite Mgr End Date: PRESS_DMSite Manager: E - ELIGIBLEElig Indicator: Not reportedOther Source Description: D - DISCHARGE NOTIFICATIONInformation Source: INACTIVECleanup Work Status: 05/10/2013Disch Cleanup Status Date: RA - RA ONGOINGDischarge Cleanup Status: R - CLEANUP REQUIREDCleanup Required: Not reportedPct Discharge Combined With: 04/26/1993Discharge Date: Contaminated Media: 1200000Cap Amount: 0Co-Pay Paid To Date: Not reportedCo-Pay Amount: 500Deductible Paid To Date: 500Deductible Amount: PCLP48 - ORANGE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVTank Office: Not reportedSite Mgr End Date: PRESS_DMSite Manager: Not reportedInspection Date: NoRedetermined: Not reportedLetter Of Intent Date: 17-OCT-07Elig Status Date: 17-OCT-07Eligibility Status: P - PETROLEUM LIABILITY AND RESTORATION INSURANCE PROGRAMCleanup Program: 16-OCT-07Application Received Date: Not reportedOther Source Description: D - DISCHARGE NOTIFICATIONInformation Source: INACTIVECleanup Work Status: 05/10/2013Disch Cleanup Status Date: RA - RA ONGOINGDischarge Cleanup Status: R - CLEANUP REQUIREDCleanup Required: Not reportedPct Discharge Combined With: 26-APR-93Discharge Date: 9045623Facility ID: Petroleum Cleanup Program Eligibility: PCLP48 - ORANGE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVTank Office: Not reportedSite Mgr End Date: PRESS_DMSite Manager: E - ELIGIBLEEligibility Indicator: Not reportedOther Source Description: D - DISCHARGE NOTIFICATIONInformation Source: INACTIVECleanup Work Status: MOBIL-WINTER SPRINGS #731 (Continued) U004130541 TC05335716.2r Page 12 359 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedRA Actual Cost: Not reportedRA Years to Complete: -RA Funding Eligibility Type: -RA Cleanup Responsible: 89795RA Task ID: Not reportedRAP Last Order Approved: Not reportedRAP Payment Date: Not reportedRAP Completion Date: Not reportedRAP Actual Cost: -RAP Funding Eligibility Type: -RAP Cleanup Responsible ID: Not reportedRAP Task ID: Not reportedSA Payment Date: Not reportedSA Completion Date: Not reportedSA Actual Cost: -SA Funding Eligibility Type: -SA Cleanup Responsible: 84141SA Task ID: Not reportedSR Alternate Procedure Comments: Not reportedSR Alternate Procedure Status Date: Not reportedSR Alternate Procedure Status: Not reportedSR Alternate Proc Received Date: Not reportedSR Other Treatment: Not reportedSR Soil Treatment: Not reportedSR Soil Tonnage Removed: Not reportedSR Free Product Removal: Not reportedSR Soil Removal: Not reportedSR Written Date: Not reportedSR Oral Date: Not reportedSR Payment Date: Not reportedSR Completion Date: Not reportedSR Actual Cost: -SR Funding Eligibility Type: -SR Cleanup Responsible: Not reportedSR Task ID: PCLP48 - Orange CountyTank Office: Not reportedSite Mgr End Date: PRESS_DMSite Mgr: INACTIVECleanup Work Status: Not reportedSRC Comment: Not reportedSRC Issue Date: -SRC Completion Status: Not reportedSRC Review Date: Not reportedSRC Submit Date: -SRC Action Type: 05-10-2013Disch Cleanup Status Date: RA - RA ONGOINGDischarge Cleanup Status: R - CLEANUP REQUIREDCleanup Required: 04-26-1993Discharge Date: Not reportedSource Effective Date: ECleanup Eligibility Status: 59County ID: SEMINOLECounty: A - Retail Station -Facility Type: OPENFacility Status: MOBIL-WINTER SPRINGS #731 (Continued) U004130541 TC05335716.2r Page 13 360 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 01-OCT-2008Status Date: RemovedStatus: 4Tank Id: PDEP Contractor: UNDERGROUNDTank Location: TANKVessel Indicator: 10000Gallons: Unleaded GasContent Description: Unleaded gasSubstance: 01-NOV-1989Install Date: 01-OCT-2008Status Date: RemovedStatus: 3Tank Id: PDEP Contractor: UNDERGROUNDTank Location: TANKVessel Indicator: 10000Gallons: Unleaded GasContent Description: Unleaded gasSubstance: 01-NOV-1989Install Date: 01-OCT-2008Status Date: RemovedStatus: 2Tank Id: PDEP Contractor: UNDERGROUNDTank Location: TANKVessel Indicator: 10000Gallons: Unleaded GasContent Description: Unleaded gasSubstance: 01-NOV-1989Install Date: 01-OCT-2008Status Date: RemovedStatus: 1Tank Id: Tank Info: (813) 681-4279Owner Phone: RICK HERWEH | PHY ADDRESS: 1201 OAKFIELD DR #109Owner Contact: BRANDON, FL 33509Owner City,St,Zip: ATTN: RICK HERWEHOwner Address 2: PO BOX 1110Owner Address: AUTOMATED PETROLEUM & ENERGY CO INC (APEC)Owner Name: 922Owner Id: Owner: 28 41 45.5900000 / 81 15 43.8500000Lat/Long (dms): DPHOPositioning Method: STATERegion: (813) 681-4279Facility Phone: Retail StationType Description: OPENFacility Status: 9045623Facility Id: UST: Click here for Florida Oculus: MOBIL-WINTER SPRINGS #731 (Continued) U004130541 TC05335716.2r Page 14 361 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Monitor dbl wall pipe spaceMonitoring Description: 5Tank ID: Electronic line leak detectorMonitoring Description: 5Tank ID: Monitor dbl wall tank spaceMonitoring Description: 5Tank ID: Monitoring: Tight fillConstruction Description: Overfill/SpillConstruction Category: 5Tank Id: Ball check valveConstruction Description: Overfill/SpillConstruction Category: 5Tank Id: Double wallConstruction Description: Secondary ContainmentConstruction Category: 5Tank Id: Flow shut-OffConstruction Description: Overfill/SpillConstruction Category: 5Tank Id: Spill containment bucketConstruction Description: Overfill/SpillConstruction Category: 5Tank Id: Level gauges/alarmsConstruction Description: Overfill/SpillConstruction Category: 5Tank Id: FiberglassConstruction Description: Primary ConstructionConstruction Category: 5Tank Id: Construction: PDEP Contractor: UNDERGROUNDTank Location: TANKVessel Indicator: 20000Gallons: Unleaded GasContent Description: Unleaded gasSubstance: 01-OCT-2008Install Date: 01-OCT-2008Status Date: In serviceStatus: 5Tank Id: PDEP Contractor: UNDERGROUNDTank Location: TANKVessel Indicator: 10000Gallons: Unleaded GasContent Description: Unleaded gasSubstance: 01-NOV-1989Install Date: MOBIL-WINTER SPRINGS #731 (Continued) U004130541 TC05335716.2r Page 15 362 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Spill containment bucketConstruction Description: Overfill/SpillConstruction Category: 6Tank Id: Level gauges/alarmsConstruction Description: Overfill/SpillConstruction Category: 6Tank Id: FiberglassConstruction Description: Primary ConstructionConstruction Category: 6Tank Id: Construction: PDEP Contractor: UNDERGROUNDTank Location: TANKVessel Indicator: 20000Gallons: Vehicular DieselContent Description: Vehicular dieselSubstance: 01-OCT-2008Install Date: 01-OCT-2008Status Date: In serviceStatus: 6Tank Id: Pressurized piping systemPiping Description: Miscellaneous AttributesPiping Category: 5Tank ID: Double wallPiping Description: Secondary ContainmentPiping Category: 5Tank ID: FiberglassPiping Description: Primary ConstructionPiping Category: 5Tank ID: Dispenser linersPiping Description: Miscellaneous AttributesPiping Category: 5Tank ID: Piping: Electronic monitor dispenser linersMonitoring Description: 5Tank ID: Electronic monitor pipe sumpsMonitoring Description: 5Tank ID: Visual inspect pipe sumpsMonitoring Description: 5Tank ID: Continuous electronic sensingMonitoring Description: 5Tank ID: Automatic tank gauging - USTsMonitoring Description: 5Tank ID: MOBIL-WINTER SPRINGS #731 (Continued) U004130541 TC05335716.2r Page 16 363 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Miscellaneous AttributesPiping Category: 6Tank ID: FiberglassPiping Description: Primary ConstructionPiping Category: 6Tank ID: Pressurized piping systemPiping Description: Miscellaneous AttributesPiping Category: 6Tank ID: Double wallPiping Description: Secondary ContainmentPiping Category: 6Tank ID: Piping: Electronic monitor dispenser linersMonitoring Description: 6Tank ID: Electronic monitor pipe sumpsMonitoring Description: 6Tank ID: Visual inspect pipe sumpsMonitoring Description: 6Tank ID: Continuous electronic sensingMonitoring Description: 6Tank ID: Automatic tank gauging - USTsMonitoring Description: 6Tank ID: Monitor dbl wall pipe spaceMonitoring Description: 6Tank ID: Electronic line leak detectorMonitoring Description: 6Tank ID: Monitor dbl wall tank spaceMonitoring Description: 6Tank ID: Monitoring: Tight fillConstruction Description: Overfill/SpillConstruction Category: 6Tank Id: CompartmentedConstruction Description: Miscellaneous AttributesConstruction Category: 6Tank Id: Double wallConstruction Description: Secondary ContainmentConstruction Category: 6Tank Id: Flow shut-OffConstruction Description: Overfill/SpillConstruction Category: 6Tank Id: MOBIL-WINTER SPRINGS #731 (Continued) U004130541 TC05335716.2r Page 17 364 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation DPHOMethod: HARNDatum: Not reportedDate Known Offsite: ACTIVERemediation Status: 46Priority Score: PRESS_DMProject Manager: UOffsite Contamination: PetroleumProgram Area: PCLP48Office/ District: 43.9905Long SS: 15Long MM: 81Long DD: 44.6788Lat SS: 41Lat MM: 28Lat DD: 9045623Program Site Id: DWM CONTAM: 28 41 44.6788 / 43.9905 81 15Latitude/Longitude (deg/min/sec): Not reportedComments: DPHOVerified Coordinate Method ID Code: HARNDC4 Datum ID Code: DPHOCMC2 Coordinate Method ID Code: STCMSource Database Name Code: Digital Aerial Photography With Ground ControlVerified Coordinate Method Id: 06/09/2005Verification Date: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PRVerifier Affiliation: WOEBER_AVerifier Username: Not reportedInterpolation Scale: 1010Map Source Scale: 1994 doqsMap Source: CONTRACTORCollect Affiliation: 07/23/2003Collect Date: PERRY_JF59Collect Username: REVIEWEDVSC1 Verification Status: High Accuracy Reference NetworkDC4 Datum Id: Digital Aerial Photography With Ground ControlCMC2 Coordinate Method Id: 4Calc Coordinates Accuracy Level Id: EXACTPC2 Proximity Id: FACILOIC Object Of Interest Id: Not reportedPhysical Address Line 2: CDOC3 Office Id: 04/03/2018Data Load Date: ACTIVERSC2 Remediation Status Key: PETROCLLC Cleanup Category Key: TKCPAC Program Area Id: 9045623Source Database Id: Storage Tank Contamination MonitoringSource Database Name: 53331034DEP Cleanup Site Key: CLEANUP SITES: Click here for Florida Oculus: Dispenser linersPiping Description: MOBIL-WINTER SPRINGS #731 (Continued) U004130541 TC05335716.2r Page 18 365 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ATTN: RICK HERWEHOwner Address2: PO BOX 1110Owner Address: AUTOMATED PETROLEUM & ENERGY CO INC (APEC)Onwer Name: 922Owner ID: 31-DEC-2016Expire Date: 31-DEC-2015Effective Date: LIBERTY SURPLUS INSURANCE CORPInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: PDEP CO: Retail StationType Description: AFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (813) 681-4279Facility Phone: 9045623Facility ID: 3Region: (813) 681-4279Resp Party Phone: RICK HERWEH | PHY ADDRESS: 1201 OAKFIELD DR #109Contact: BRANDON, FL 33509Owner City,St,Zip: ATTN: RICK HERWEHOwner Address2: PO BOX 1110Owner Address: AUTOMATED PETROLEUM & ENERGY CO INC (APEC)Onwer Name: 922Owner ID: 31-DEC-2014Expire Date: 31-DEC-2013Effective Date: LIBERTY SURPLUS INSURANCE CORPInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: PDEP CO: Retail StationType Description: AFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (813) 681-4279Facility Phone: 9045623Facility ID: 3Region: (813) 681-4279Resp Party Phone: RICK HERWEH | PHY ADDRESS: 1201 OAKFIELD DR #109Contact: BRANDON, FL 33509Owner City,St,Zip: ATTN: RICK HERWEHOwner Address2: PO BOX 1110Owner Address: AUTOMATED PETROLEUM & ENERGY CO INC (APEC)Onwer Name: 922Owner ID: 29-APR-2011Expire Date: 30-APR-2010Effective Date: ANCON INSURANCE CO INCInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: PDEP CO: Retail StationType Description: AFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (813) 681-4279Facility Phone: 9045623Facility ID: 3Region: FL Financial Assurance 3: Not reportedIneligible: YesProgram Eligible: MOBIL-WINTER SPRINGS #731 (Continued) U004130541 TC05335716.2r Page 19 366 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ATTN: RICK HERWEHOwner Address2: PO BOX 1110Owner Address: AUTOMATED PETROLEUM & ENERGY CO INC (APEC)Onwer Name: 922Owner ID: 30-APR-2010Expire Date: 01-MAY-2009Effective Date: Not reportedInsurance Company: SELF-INSURANCE - LETTER FROM CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICFinaincial Responsibility: PDEP CO: Retail StationType Description: AFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (813) 681-4279Facility Phone: 9045623Facility ID: 3Region: (813) 681-4279Resp Party Phone: RICK HERWEH | PHY ADDRESS: 1201 OAKFIELD DR #109Contact: BRANDON, FL 33509Owner City,St,Zip: ATTN: RICK HERWEHOwner Address2: PO BOX 1110Owner Address: AUTOMATED PETROLEUM & ENERGY CO INC (APEC)Onwer Name: 922Owner ID: 30-APR-2009Expire Date: 01-MAY-2008Effective Date: Not reportedInsurance Company: SELF-INSURANCE - LETTER FROM CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICFinaincial Responsibility: PDEP CO: Retail StationType Description: AFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (813) 681-4279Facility Phone: 9045623Facility ID: 3Region: (813) 681-4279Resp Party Phone: RICK HERWEH | PHY ADDRESS: 1201 OAKFIELD DR #109Contact: BRANDON, FL 33509Owner City,St,Zip: ATTN: RICK HERWEHOwner Address2: PO BOX 1110Owner Address: AUTOMATED PETROLEUM & ENERGY CO INC (APEC)Onwer Name: 922Owner ID: 18-DEC-2013Expire Date: 18-DEC-2012Effective Date: IRONSHORE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: PDEP CO: Retail StationType Description: AFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (813) 681-4279Facility Phone: 9045623Facility ID: 3Region: (813) 681-4279Resp Party Phone: RICK HERWEH | PHY ADDRESS: 1201 OAKFIELD DR #109Contact: BRANDON, FL 33509Owner City,St,Zip: MOBIL-WINTER SPRINGS #731 (Continued) U004130541 TC05335716.2r Page 20 367 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation (813) 681-4279Resp Party Phone: RICK HERWEH | PHY ADDRESS: 1201 OAKFIELD DR #109Contact: BRANDON, FL 33509Owner City,St,Zip: ATTN: RICK HERWEHOwner Address2: PO BOX 1110Owner Address: AUTOMATED PETROLEUM & ENERGY CO INC (APEC)Onwer Name: 922Owner ID: 31-DEC-2015Expire Date: 31-DEC-2014Effective Date: LIBERTY SURPLUS INSURANCE CORPInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: PDEP CO: Retail StationType Description: AFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (813) 681-4279Facility Phone: 9045623Facility ID: 3Region: (813) 681-4279Resp Party Phone: RICK HERWEH | PHY ADDRESS: 1201 OAKFIELD DR #109Contact: BRANDON, FL 33509Owner City,St,Zip: ATTN: RICK HERWEHOwner Address2: PO BOX 1110Owner Address: AUTOMATED PETROLEUM & ENERGY CO INC (APEC)Onwer Name: 922Owner ID: 30-APR-2012Expire Date: 30-APR-2011Effective Date: ILLINOIS UNIONInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: PDEP CO: Retail StationType Description: AFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (813) 681-4279Facility Phone: 9045623Facility ID: 3Region: (813) 681-4279Resp Party Phone: RICK HERWEH | PHY ADDRESS: 1201 OAKFIELD DR #109Contact: BRANDON, FL 33509Owner City,St,Zip: MOBIL-WINTER SPRINGS #731 (Continued) U004130541 GALLOWS RDContact address: DAN HORTONContact: FAIRFAX, VA 22037-0002 GALLOWS RDMailing address: FLD984205518EPA ID: WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708 1205 E SR 434Facility address: MOBIL OIL CORP SS #Q8MFacility name: 10/12/2011Date form received by agency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 173 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster B 0.033 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 43 ft. < 1/8 ECHOWINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708 SW FINDS1205 E SR 434 FLD984205518 B5 RCRA NonGen / NLRMOBIL OIL CORP SS #Q8M 1000702716 TC05335716.2r Page 21 368 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 06/15/1991Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: FAIRFAX, VA 22037 3225 GALLOWS RDOwner/operator address: MOBIL OIL CORP SS # Q8MOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 02/09/2000Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: FAIRFAX, VA 22037 3225 GALLOWS RDOwner/operator address: DAN HORTONOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 10/27/2011Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: FAIRFAX, VA 22037 3225 GALLOWS RDOwner/operator address: DONNA HYMESOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: Handler: Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous wasteDescription: Non-GeneratorClassification: 04EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: 703-849-3330Contact telephone: USContact country: FAIRFAX, VA 22037-0002 MOBIL OIL CORP SS #Q8M (Continued) 1000702716 TC05335716.2r Page 22 369 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110006386534DFR URL: 110006386534Registry ID: 1000702716Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access affiliation data for the State of Florida. Maintenance (FDM) system maintains entity, environmental interest and Florida Environmental System Today Application (FIESTA) Data corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110006386534Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: BENZENE. Waste name: D018. Waste code: IGNITABLE WASTE. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: MOBIL OIL CORP SS #Q8MSite name: 08/02/1991Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: BENZENE. Waste name: D018. Waste code: IGNITABLE WASTE. Waste name: D001. Waste code: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: MOBIL OIL CORP SS #Q8M (Continued) 1000702716 TC05335716.2r Page 23 370 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NFA - NFA COMPLETEDischarge Cleanup Status: R - CLEANUP REQUIREDCleanup Required: Not reportedPct Discharge Combined With: 28-SEP-87Discharge Date: 8516641Facility ID: Petroleum Cleanup Program Eligibility: PCLP48 - ORANGE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVTank Office: 09/10/2013Site Mgr End Date: PRESS_DMSite Manager: E - ELIGIBLEEligibility Indicator: Not reportedOther Source Description: C - CLOSURE REPORTInformation Source: COMPLETEDCleanup Work Status: 10/02/2013Disch Cleanup Status Date: NFA - NFA COMPLETEDischarge Cleanup Status: R - CLEANUP REQUIREDCleanup Required: Not reportedPCT Discharge Combined: 09/28/1987Discharge Date: PCLP48 - ORANGE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVTank Office: 09/10/2013Site Mgr End Date: PRESS_DMSite Manager: E - ELIGIBLEEligibility Indicator: Not reportedOther Source Description: D - DISCHARGE NOTIFICATIONInformation Source: COMPLETEDCleanup Work Status: 10/02/2013Disch Cleanup Status Date: NFA - NFA COMPLETEDischarge Cleanup Status: R - CLEANUP REQUIREDCleanup Required: Not reportedPCT Discharge Combined: 08/07/2000Discharge Date: Discharge Cleanup Summary: 08/29/2000Address Update: Not reportedName Update: BRENT PUZAKOperator: 76Score When Ranked: 02/01/2013Score Effective Date: 56Score: 0Datum: DPHOMethod: Not reportedFeature: 030Range: 020Township: 036Section: 28 41 47.7907 / 81 15 47.2791Lat/Long (dms): Central DistrictDistrict: 556Facility Cleanup Rank: (904)327-1217Facility Phone: A - Retail StationFacility Type: CLOSEDFacility Status: 8516641Facility Id: STATERegion: LUST: 545 ft. 0.103 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 45 ft. < 1/8 Financial AssuranceWINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708 West UST170 TUSCAWILLA RD N/A 6 LUSTHANDY WAY FOOD STORE #3333 U003334173 TC05335716.2r Page 24 371 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation YesContaminated Ground Water: NoContaminated Surface Water: YesContaminated Soil: NoContaminated Monitoring Well: 0Contaminated Drinking Wells: PCLP48 - ORANGE COUNTY ENVIRONTank Office: 09/10/2013Site Mgr End Date: PRESS_DMSite Manager: E - ELIGIBLEElig Indicator: Not reportedOther Source Description: C - CLOSURE REPORTInformation Source: COMPLETEDCleanup Work Status: 10/02/2013Disch Cleanup Status Date: NFA - NFA COMPLETEDischarge Cleanup Status: R - CLEANUP REQUIREDCleanup Required: Not reportedPct Discharge Combined With: 09/28/1987Discharge Date: Not reportedGallons Discharged: Not reportedPollutant Other Description: B - Unleaded GasPollutant: YesContaminated Ground Water: Not reportedContaminated Surface Water: Not reportedContaminated Soil: Not reportedContaminated Monitoring Well: Not reportedContaminated Drinking Wells: PCLP48 - ORANGE COUNTY ENVIRONTank Office: 09/10/2013Site Mgr End Date: PRESS_DMSite Manager: E - ELIGIBLEElig Indicator: Not reportedOther Source Description: D - DISCHARGE NOTIFICATIONInformation Source: COMPLETEDCleanup Work Status: 10/02/2013Disch Cleanup Status Date: NFA - NFA COMPLETEDischarge Cleanup Status: R - CLEANUP REQUIREDCleanup Required: Not reportedPct Discharge Combined With: 08/07/2000Discharge Date: Contaminated Media: Not reportedCap Amount: 0Co-Pay Paid To Date: Not reportedCo-Pay Amount: 0Deductible Paid To Date: Not reportedDeductible Amount: PCLP48 - ORANGE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVTank Office: 09/10/2013Site Mgr End Date: PRESS_DMSite Manager: 07/27/2000Inspection Date: NoRedetermined: 07/28/1994Letter Of Intent Date: 21-MAR-88Elig Status Date: 21-MAR-88Eligibility Status: E - EARLY DETECTION INCENTIVECleanup Program: 30-SEP-87Application Received Date: Not reportedOther Source Description: C - CLOSURE REPORTInformation Source: COMPLETEDCleanup Work Status: 10/02/2013Disch Cleanup Status Date: HANDY WAY FOOD STORE #3333 (Continued) U003334173 TC05335716.2r Page 25 372 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 90612RA Task ID: Not reportedRAP Last Order Approved: Not reportedRAP Payment Date: Not reportedRAP Completion Date: Not reportedRAP Actual Cost: -RAP Funding Eligibility Type: -RAP Cleanup Responsible ID: Not reportedRAP Task ID: Not reportedSA Payment Date: Not reportedSA Completion Date: Not reportedSA Actual Cost: -SA Funding Eligibility Type: -SA Cleanup Responsible: 91160SA Task ID: Not reportedSR Alternate Procedure Comments: Not reportedSR Alternate Procedure Status Date: Not reportedSR Alternate Procedure Status: Not reportedSR Alternate Proc Received Date: Not reportedSR Other Treatment: Not reportedSR Soil Treatment: Not reportedSR Soil Tonnage Removed: Not reportedSR Free Product Removal: Not reportedSR Soil Removal: Not reportedSR Written Date: Not reportedSR Oral Date: Not reportedSR Payment Date: Not reportedSR Completion Date: Not reportedSR Actual Cost: -SR Funding Eligibility Type: -SR Cleanup Responsible: Not reportedSR Task ID: PCLP48 - Orange CountyTank Office: 09-10-2013Site Mgr End Date: PRESS_DMSite Mgr: COMPLETEDCleanup Work Status: Not reportedSRC Comment: 10-02-2013SRC Issue Date: A - APPROVEDSRC Completion Status: 07-10-2013SRC Review Date: 06-19-2013SRC Submit Date: NFA - NO FURTHER ACTIONSRC Action Type: 10-02-2013Disch Cleanup Status Date: NFA - NFA COMPLETEDischarge Cleanup Status: R - CLEANUP REQUIREDCleanup Required: 08-07-2000Discharge Date: 07-10-2013Source Effective Date: ECleanup Eligibility Status: 59County ID: SEMINOLECounty: A - Retail Station -Facility Type: CLOSEDFacility Status: 8516641Facility ID: CDDistrict: Task Information: Not reportedGallons Discharged: Not reportedPollutant Other Description: A - Leaded GasPollutant: HANDY WAY FOOD STORE #3333 (Continued) U003334173 TC05335716.2r Page 26 373 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 23274RA Task ID: Not reportedRAP Last Order Approved: Not reportedRAP Payment Date: Not reportedRAP Completion Date: Not reportedRAP Actual Cost: -RAP Funding Eligibility Type: RP - RESPONSIBLE PARTYRAP Cleanup Responsible ID: 23273RAP Task ID: Not reportedSA Payment Date: 01-17-1997SA Completion Date: Not reportedSA Actual Cost: -SA Funding Eligibility Type: RP - RESPONSIBLE PARTYSA Cleanup Responsible: 23272SA Task ID: Not reportedSR Alternate Procedure Comments: Not reportedSR Alternate Procedure Status Date: Not reportedSR Alternate Procedure Status: Not reportedSR Alternate Proc Received Date: Not reportedSR Other Treatment: YSR Soil Treatment: Not reportedSR Soil Tonnage Removed: Not reportedSR Free Product Removal: YSR Soil Removal: Not reportedSR Written Date: Not reportedSR Oral Date: Not reportedSR Payment Date: Not reportedSR Completion Date: Not reportedSR Actual Cost: -SR Funding Eligibility Type: RP - RESPONSIBLE PARTYSR Cleanup Responsible: 23271SR Task ID: PCLP48 - Orange CountyTank Office: 09-10-2013Site Mgr End Date: PRESS_DMSite Mgr: COMPLETEDCleanup Work Status: Not reportedSRC Comment: 10-02-2013SRC Issue Date: A - APPROVEDSRC Completion Status: 07-10-2013SRC Review Date: 06-19-2013SRC Submit Date: NFA - NO FURTHER ACTIONSRC Action Type: 10-02-2013Disch Cleanup Status Date: NFA - NFA COMPLETEDischarge Cleanup Status: R - CLEANUP REQUIREDCleanup Required: 09-28-1987Discharge Date: 07-10-2013Source Effective Date: ECleanup Eligibility Status: 59County ID: SEMINOLECounty: A - Retail Station -Facility Type: CLOSEDFacility Status: 8516641Facility ID: CDDistrict: Not reportedRA Actual Cost: 0RA Years to Complete: -RA Funding Eligibility Type: ST - STATERA Cleanup Responsible: HANDY WAY FOOD STORE #3333 (Continued) U003334173 TC05335716.2r Page 27 374 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation UNDERGROUNDTank Location: TANKVessel Indicator: 12000Gallons: Unleaded GasContent Description: Unleaded gasSubstance: 01-APR-1995Install Date: 01-JUL-2000Status Date: RemovedStatus: 3Tank Id: PDEP Contractor: UNDERGROUNDTank Location: TANKVessel Indicator: 10000Gallons: Unleaded GasContent Description: Unleaded gasSubstance: 01-MAY-1982Install Date: 27-MAR-1995Status Date: RemovedStatus: 2Tank Id: PDEP Contractor: UNDERGROUNDTank Location: TANKVessel Indicator: 10000Gallons: Unleaded GasContent Description: Unleaded gasSubstance: 01-MAY-1982Install Date: 27-MAR-1995Status Date: RemovedStatus: 1Tank Id: Tank Info: (919) 774-6700Owner Phone: BRENT PUZAK | RAMON INCIONG (386) 916-6267Owner Contact: CARY, NC 27511Owner City,St,Zip: ATTN: STORAGE TANK REGISOwner Address 2: 305 GREGSON DROwner Address: THE PANTRY INCOwner Name: 10563Owner Id: Owner: 28 41 47.9799999 / 81 15 47.0200000Lat/Long (dms): DPHOPositioning Method: STATERegion: (904) 327-1217Facility Phone: Retail StationType Description: CLOSEDFacility Status: 8516641Facility Id: UST: Click here for Florida Oculus: Not reportedRA Actual Cost: 0RA Years to Complete: -RA Funding Eligibility Type: ST - STATERA Cleanup Responsible: HANDY WAY FOOD STORE #3333 (Continued) U003334173 TC05335716.2r Page 28 375 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedEffective Date: Not reportedInsurance Company: SELF-INSURANCE - LETTER FROM CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICFinaincial Responsibility: PDEP CO: Retail StationType Description: AFacility Type: CLOSEDFacility Status: (904) 327-1217Facility Phone: 8516641Facility ID: 3Region: (919) 774-6700Resp Party Phone: BRENT PUZAK | RAMON INCIONG (386) 916-6267Contact: CARY, NC 27511Owner City,St,Zip: ATTN: STORAGE TANK REGISOwner Address2: 305 GREGSON DROwner Address: THE PANTRY INCOnwer Name: 10563Owner ID: 09-APR-1991Expire Date: 09-APR-1990Effective Date: FPLIPAInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: PDEP CO: Retail StationType Description: AFacility Type: CLOSEDFacility Status: (904) 327-1217Facility Phone: 8516641Facility ID: 3Region: FL Financial Assurance 3: Click here for Florida Oculus: PDEP Contractor: UNDERGROUNDTank Location: TANKVessel Indicator: 10000Gallons: Unleaded GasContent Description: Unleaded gasSubstance: 01-APR-1995Install Date: 01-JUL-2000Status Date: RemovedStatus: 5Tank Id: PDEP Contractor: UNDERGROUNDTank Location: TANKVessel Indicator: 10000Gallons: Unleaded GasContent Description: Unleaded gasSubstance: 01-MAY-1982Install Date: 27-MAR-1995Status Date: RemovedStatus: 4Tank Id: PDEP Contractor: HANDY WAY FOOD STORE #3333 (Continued) U003334173 TC05335716.2r Page 29 376 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation (919) 774-6700Resp Party Phone: BRENT PUZAK | RAMON INCIONG (386) 916-6267Contact: CARY, NC 27511Owner City,St,Zip: ATTN: STORAGE TANK REGISOwner Address2: 305 GREGSON DROwner Address: THE PANTRY INCOnwer Name: 10563Owner ID: Not reportedExpire Date: HANDY WAY FOOD STORE #3333 (Continued) U003334173 28 41 37.4926000 / 81 15 38.2828000Latitude/Longitude (deg/min/sec): Digital Aerial Photography With Ground ControlDecode for V_Method: extend offsite. that contamination above applicable standards or criteria DOES NOT No, the best available evidence (such as completed SAR) demonstratesDecode for Off Site COC: Digital Aerial Photography With Ground ControlDecode for Method: North American Datum of 1983Decode for Datum: Central DistrictDecode for District: 08/24/2016Verification Date: CRVerifying Program Id: Florida Department of Environmental ProtectionVerifier Affiliation: HOUSTON_GVerifier Username: DPHOVerify Method Id: 3Coordinate Accuracy Id: 12000Interpolation Scale: 12000Map Source Scale: IMAGERY_11_13Map Series Used: 08/24/2016Collect Date: CRCollect Program Id: Florida Department of Environmental ProtectionCollect Affiliation: HOUSTON_GCollect Username: EXACTProximity To Object: CAP_RAP SITEObject Of Interest: Not reportedFeature: DPHOMethod ID: NAD83Datum: Not reportedPriority Score: NOffsite Cont Impact: Not reportedContaminants: 08/23/2016Initial Date Received: Not reportedOGC Case Number: HOUSTON_GProject Manager: CLOSEDSite Status: 352812Project Id: 346911Site Id: Central DistrictDistrict: RESP PARTY: 912 ft. 0.173 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 34 ft. 1/8-1/4 WINTER SPRINGS,, FL 32708 SSE E SR 434 N/A 7 RESP PARTYSCRIMSHER PARCEL S118895025 TC05335716.2r Page 30 377 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Monitor dbl wall tank spaceMonitoring Description: 1Tank ID: Visual inspection of ASTsMonitoring Description: 1Tank ID: Monitoring: Level gauges/alarmsConstruction Description: Overfill/SpillConstruction Category: 1Tank Id: Spill containment bucketConstruction Description: Overfill/SpillConstruction Category: 1Tank Id: Double wallConstruction Description: Secondary ContainmentConstruction Category: 1Tank Id: SteelConstruction Description: Primary ConstructionConstruction Category: 1Tank Id: Construction: ABOVEGROUNDTank Location: 1000Gallons: Emerg Generator DieselContent Description: Diesel-emergen generatorSubstance: 01-NOV-2007Install Date: 01-NOV-2007Status Date: In serviceStatus: 1Tank Id: (863) 499-5418Owner Phone: MICHAEL HEWETTOwner Contact: LAKELAND, FL 33802Owner City,St,Zip: ATTN: STORAGE TANK REGISOwner Address 2: PO BOX 407Owner Address: PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS INC - ENVIRONMENTALOwner Name: 25164Owner Id: Owner: Not reportedLat/Long (dms): Not reportedPositioning Method: STATERegion: CDEP Contractor Own: (407) 327-9725Facility Phone: Fuel user/Non-retailType Description: OPENFacility Status: 9809815Facility ID: AST: 1131 ft. 0.214 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 46 ft. 1/8-1/4 WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708 NW 1160 E SR 434 N/A 8 ASTPUBLIX SUPER MARKET #62 A100318088 TC05335716.2r Page 31 378 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Click here for Florida Oculus: Suction piping systemPiping Description: Miscellaneous AttributesPiping Category: 1Tank ID: Abv, no soil contactPiping Description: Miscellaneous AttributesPiping Category: 1Tank ID: Piping: Continuous electronic sensingMonitoring Description: 1Tank ID: PUBLIX SUPER MARKET #62 (Continued) A100318088 Overfill/SpillConstruction Category: 1Tank Id: SteelConstruction Description: Primary ConstructionConstruction Category: 1Tank Id: Construction: ABOVEGROUNDTank Location: 750Gallons: Emerg Generator DieselContent Description: Diesel-emergen generatorSubstance: 01-JUL-1997Install Date: 01-JUL-1997Status Date: In serviceStatus: 1Tank Id: (407) 320-0067Owner Phone: KIM M DOVEOwner Contact: SANFORD, FL 32773Owner City,St,Zip: ATTN: KIM M DOVEOwner Address 2: 400 E LAKE MARY BLVDOwner Address: SEMINOLE CNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLSOwner Name: 19532Owner Id: Owner: Not reportedLat/Long (dms): Not reportedPositioning Method: STATERegion: CDEP Contractor Own: (407) 320-7412Facility Phone: County GovernmentType Description: OPENFacility Status: 9813093Facility ID: AST: 1308 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster C 0.248 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 33 ft. 1/8-1/4 WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708 NNE 130 TUSKAWILLA RD N/A C9 ASTWINTER SPRINGS HIGH SCHOOL A100360884 TC05335716.2r Page 32 379 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Click here for Florida Oculus: Approved synthetic materialPiping Description: Primary ConstructionPiping Category: 1Tank ID: Abv, no soil contactPiping Description: Miscellaneous AttributesPiping Category: 1Tank ID: Steel/galvanized metalPiping Description: Primary ConstructionPiping Category: 1Tank ID: Suction piping systemPiping Description: Miscellaneous AttributesPiping Category: 1Tank ID: Piping: Visual inspection of ASTsMonitoring Description: 1Tank ID: Monitor dbl wall tank spaceMonitoring Description: 1Tank ID: Monitoring: Double wallConstruction Description: Secondary ContainmentConstruction Category: 1Tank Id: Level gauges/alarmsConstruction Description: WINTER SPRINGS HIGH SCHOOL (Continued) A100360884 month, and accumulates 1000 kg or less of hazardous waste at any time; Handler: generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste per calendarDescription: Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 04EPA Region: DALE_PHILLIPS@SCPS.K12.FL.USContact email: 407-320-8750Contact telephone: USContact country: WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708-2831 TUSKAWILLA RDContact address: DALE PHILLIPSContact: WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708-2831 TUSKAWILLA RDMailing address: FLR000147058EPA ID: WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708-2831 130 TUSKAWILLA RDFacility address: WINTER SPRINGS HIGH SCHOOLFacility name: 05/19/2008Date form received by agency: RCRA-CESQG: 1308 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster C 0.248 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 33 ft. 1/8-1/4 WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708 NNE 130 TUSKAWILLA RD FLR000147058 C10 RCRA-CESQGWINTER SPRINGS HIGH SCHOOL 1011488366 TC05335716.2r Page 33 380 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 05/19/2008Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708 130 TUSKAWILLA RDOwner/operator address: CICCARELLO DAWNOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 05/19/2008Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708 130 TUSKAWILLA RDOwner/operator address: DAWN CICCARELLOOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 05/19/2008Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: CountyLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 407-320-0067Owner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: SANFORD, FL 32773 400 E LAKE MARY BLVDOwner/operator address: SEMINOLE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARDOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste; or 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates at any from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting land or water, of acutely hazardous waste; or generates 100 kg or less other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any waste; or 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or month, and accumulates at any time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous or generates 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste per calendar WINTER SPRINGS HIGH SCHOOL (Continued) 1011488366 TC05335716.2r Page 34 381 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No violations foundViolation Status: REACTIVE WASTE. Waste name: D003. Waste code: CORROSIVE WASTE. Waste name: D002. Waste code: IGNITABLE WASTE. Waste name: D001. Waste code: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: WINTER SPRINGS HIGH SCHOOL (Continued) 1011488366 12/20/2007Datestamp: CLARKE_CUser Name: aka L.D. Plante, Inc.Comment: 01/17/2008Date Verification: DPHOVerification: PAPERMethod: Seminole CountySource: 35.89Long SS: 15Long MM: 81Long DD: 24.12Lat SS: 41Lat MM: 28Lat DD: -81.2598369Longitude: 28.6896972Latitude: 523396.5232Y Coordinate: 667217.022X Coordinate: 12/27/2007BSRA Date: AWAITING CLEANUPRemediation: 6.15871099Acreage: CentralDistrict: Not reportedSRCO Date: Former Central Florida Drum FacilityArea Name: BF590702000Area Id: 59County Code: 23Object Id: BF590702001Site Id: BROWNFIELDS: 1709 ft. 0.324 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 40 ft. 1/4-1/2 ASBESTOSWINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708 South AIRS2950 (M-1 ZONING AREA ONLY) AND 2960 RAILROAD AVENUE N/A 11 BROWNFIELDSFORMER CENTRAL FLORIDA DRUM FACILITY S116348626 TC05335716.2r Page 35 382 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0Pipe SF: Not reportedPipe RACM: 0Floor SF: Not reportedFloor RACM: 0Cementitious SF: Not reportedCementitious RACM: 05/31/2016Finish Date: 05/02/2016Start Date: BOYKIN CONSTRUCTIONContractor Name: STANARD PACIFICOwner Name: Not reportedAnnual Notification: Not reportedOrdered Demolition?: 2950 RAILROADSite Name: REVIEWEDNotification Status: DEMOLITIONProject Type: ORIGINALNotification Type: 87482Notification ID: AS11701467Facility ID: ASBESTOS: william@boykinconstruction.comContact EMail: 352-302-6074Contact Phone: 7910Contact Zip4: 34715Contact Zip Code: FLContact State: MinneolaContact City: Not reportedContact Address2: 116 W Center StContact Address1: Willaim CrispContact Name: 28 41 20.3653 / 81 15 31.7496Lat/Long (dms): 01/23/2021Expiration Date: 01/23/2016Issue Date: 7775885001AGPermit Number: NoTitle V: Stone, Clay, Glass And Concrete ProductsSIC: Boykin ConstructionOwner Name: POINTCategory: CDOffice: permit issuance. it may not be operating at the time of, or immediately subsequent to, an existing facility which has not been permanently shut down, though modification), or on long-term reserve shutdown. This code indicates temporarily shut down (including any shutdown while undergoing Active One or more emissions units in operation, on standby status,Facility Status: 7775885Facility ID: AIRS: -81.2598369Longitude: 28.6896972Latitude: Not reportedIssue Date: 12/27/2007Executed Date: BF590702001Site Id: 6.45Acreage: CentralDistrict: BF590702000Area Id: BSRA: FORMER CENTRAL FLORIDA DRUM FACILITY (Continued) S116348626 TC05335716.2r Page 36 383 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedDate Receive: Not reportedTransporter Zip: Not reportedTransporter State: Not reportedTransporter City: Not reportedTransporter Address: WWaste Disp Source: 22321Waste Disp ID: YContractor is Transporter: Not reportedTransporter Name: 32703Waste Disposal Zip: FLWaste Disposal State: APOPKAWaste Disposal City: 255 W. KEENE ROADWaste Disposal Address: KEENE ROAD LANDFILL - CLASS IIIWaste Disposal Site: 0Surface Mat SF: Not reportedSurface Mat RACM: 0Roof SF: Not reportedRoof RACM: 0CF RACM: FORMER CENTRAL FLORIDA DRUM FACILITY (Continued) S116348626 ORIGINALNotification Type: 87645Notification ID: AS11701468Facility ID: ASBESTOS: Click here for Florida Oculus: Not reportedLand Owner Telephone: Not reportedLand Owner City/State/Zip: Not reportedLand Owner Address: Not reportedLand Owner Name: Not reportedSite Supervisor Telephone: Not reportedSite Supervisor City/State/Zip: Not reportedSite Supervisor Addr: Not reportedSite Supervisor Name: Not reportedEMail Address2: Not reportedEMail Address1: Not reportedResponsible Authority Phone: Not reportedResponsible Authority City,St,Zip: Not reportedResponsible Authority Address: Not reportedResponsible Authority Name: Not reportedRange: Not reportedTownship: Not reportedSection: INACTIVE (I)Class Status: DISASTER DEBRIS MANAGEMENT SITEClassification: 910Class Type: 28:41:24.79 / 81:15:48.91Lat/Long: CDDistrict: 104855Facility ID: SWF/LF: 2467 ft. 0.467 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 47 ft. 1/4-1/2 WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708 SSW ASBESTOS395 TUSKAWILLA RD. & 2950 RAILROAD AVE. N/A 12 SWF/LFVACANT CHURCH AND WAREHOUSE S120042590 TC05335716.2r Page 37 384 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedDate Receive: Not reportedTransporter Zip: FLTransporter State: Not reportedTransporter City: Not reportedTransporter Address: WWaste Disp Source: 85764Waste Disp ID: YContractor is Transporter: Not reportedTransporter Name: 33538Waste Disposal Zip: FLWaste Disposal State: LAKE PANASOFFKEEWaste Disposal City: 1032 CR 529AWaste Disposal Address: ACMS CLASS I LANDFILLWaste Disposal Site: 1150Surface Mat SF: Not reportedSurface Mat RACM: Not reportedRoof SF: Not reportedRoof RACM: Not reportedCF RACM: Not reportedPipe SF: Not reportedPipe RACM: 250Floor SF: Not reportedFloor RACM: 600Cementitious SF: Not reportedCementitious RACM: 05/17/2016Finish Date: 05/11/2016Start Date: CROSS CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC.Contractor Name: STANDARD PACIFIC OF FLORIDAOwner Name: Not reportedAnnual Notification: NOrdered Demolition?: CHURCH AND WAREHOUSESite Name: REVIEWEDNotification Status: RENOVATIONProject Type: VACANT CHURCH AND WAREHOUSE (Continued) S120042590 02/07/2005Score Effective Date: 26Score: 0Datum: DPHOMethod: Not reportedFeature: 30ERange: 20STownship: 036Section: 28 42 6.6917 / 81 15 56.1041Lat/Long (dms): Central DistrictDistrict: 6627Facility Cleanup Rank: (407)327-1800Facility Phone: H - Local GovernmentFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: 8731664Facility Id: STATERegion: LUST: 2586 ft. 0.490 mi.Financial Assurance Relative: Higher Actual: 43 ft. 1/4-1/2 ASTWINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708 NW UST1126 E HWY 434 N/A 13 LUSTWINTER SPRINGS CITY-CITY HALL U001374552 TC05335716.2r Page 38 385 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 10-03-2008SRC Issue Date: A - APPROVEDSRC Completion Status: 09-19-2008SRC Review Date: 09-16-2008SRC Submit Date: NFA - NO FURTHER ACTIONSRC Action Type: 10-03-2008Disch Cleanup Status Date: NFA - NFA COMPLETEDischarge Cleanup Status: R - CLEANUP REQUIREDCleanup Required: 05-15-2003Discharge Date: 09-19-2008Source Effective Date: ICleanup Eligibility Status: 59County ID: SEMINOLECounty: H - Local Government -Facility Type: OPENFacility Status: 8731664Facility ID: CDDistrict: Task Information: Not reportedGallons Discharged: DAMAGE TO THE FILL PORT AREA, RECENT CONSTRUCTIONPollutant Other Description: B - Unleaded GasPollutant: Not reportedContaminated Ground Water: Not reportedContaminated Surface Water: Not reportedContaminated Soil: YesContaminated Monitoring Well: Not reportedContaminated Drinking Wells: PCLP59 - ORANGE COUNTY ENVIRONTank Office: 12/10/2008Site Mgr End Date: SCHMIDT_JDSite Manager: I - INELIGIBLEElig Indicator: COMPLIANCE INSPECTIONOther Source Description: D - DISCHARGE NOTIFICATIONInformation Source: COMPLETEDCleanup Work Status: 10/03/2008Disch Cleanup Status Date: NFA - NFA COMPLETEDischarge Cleanup Status: R - CLEANUP REQUIREDCleanup Required: Not reportedPct Discharge Combined With: 05/15/2003Discharge Date: Contaminated Media: PCLP59 - ORANGE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVTank Office: 12/10/2008Site Mgr End Date: SCHMIDT_JDSite Manager: I - INELIGIBLEEligibility Indicator: COMPLIANCE INSPECTIONOther Source Description: D - DISCHARGE NOTIFICATIONInformation Source: COMPLETEDCleanup Work Status: 10/03/2008Disch Cleanup Status Date: NFA - NFA COMPLETEDischarge Cleanup Status: R - CLEANUP REQUIREDCleanup Required: Not reportedPCT Discharge Combined: 05/15/2003Discharge Date: Discharge Cleanup Summary: 07/22/2011Address Update: 09/15/2009Name Update: KIP LOCKCUFFOperator: 26Score When Ranked: WINTER SPRINGS CITY-CITY HALL (Continued) U001374552 TC05335716.2r Page 39 386 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ATTN: STORAGE TANK REGISOwner Address 2: 1126 E SR 434Owner Address: WINTER SPRINGS CITYOwner Name: 24225Owner Id: Owner: 28 42 6.41999999 / 81 15 58.2000000Lat/Long (dms): DPHOPositioning Method: STATERegion: (407) 327-1800Facility Phone: Local GovernmentType Description: OPENFacility Status: 8731664Facility Id: UST: Click here for Florida Oculus: Not reportedRA Actual Cost: 0RA Years to Complete: -RA Funding Eligibility Type: -RA Cleanup Responsible: 83531RA Task ID: Not reportedRAP Last Order Approved: Not reportedRAP Payment Date: Not reportedRAP Completion Date: Not reportedRAP Actual Cost: -RAP Funding Eligibility Type: -RAP Cleanup Responsible ID: 83785RAP Task ID: Not reportedSA Payment Date: Not reportedSA Completion Date: Not reportedSA Actual Cost: -SA Funding Eligibility Type: -SA Cleanup Responsible: 82754SA Task ID: Not reportedSR Alternate Procedure Comments: Not reportedSR Alternate Procedure Status Date: Not reportedSR Alternate Procedure Status: Not reportedSR Alternate Proc Received Date: Not reportedSR Other Treatment: Not reportedSR Soil Treatment: 24SR Soil Tonnage Removed: Not reportedSR Free Product Removal: YSR Soil Removal: Not reportedSR Written Date: Not reportedSR Oral Date: Not reportedSR Payment Date: 10-22-2003SR Completion Date: Not reportedSR Actual Cost: -SR Funding Eligibility Type: -SR Cleanup Responsible: 82753SR Task ID: PCLP59 - Seminole CountyTank Office: 12-10-2008Site Mgr End Date: SCHMIDT_JDSite Mgr: COMPLETEDCleanup Work Status: Not reportedSRC Comment: WINTER SPRINGS CITY-CITY HALL (Continued) U001374552 TC05335716.2r Page 40 387 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1000Gallons: Emerg Generator DieselContent Description: Diesel-emergen generatorSubstance: 01-MAY-2009Install Date: 01-MAY-2009Status Date: In serviceStatus: 3Tank Id: (407) 327-6584Owner Phone: STEPHANIE MONICA | 407-346-1900Owner Contact: WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708Owner City,St,Zip: ATTN: STORAGE TANK REGISOwner Address 2: 1126 E SR 434Owner Address: WINTER SPRINGS CITYOwner Name: 24225Owner Id: Owner: 28 42 6.41999999 / 81 15 58.2000000Lat/Long (dms): DPHOPositioning Method: STATERegion: CDEP Contractor Own: (407) 327-1800Facility Phone: Local GovernmentType Description: OPENFacility Status: 8731664Facility ID: AST: Click here for Florida Oculus: CDEP Contractor: UNDERGROUNDTank Location: TANKVessel Indicator: 1000Gallons: Emerg Generator DieselContent Description: Diesel-emergen generatorSubstance: 01-APR-1985Install Date: 01-MAY-2009Status Date: RemovedStatus: 2Tank Id: CDEP Contractor: UNDERGROUNDTank Location: TANKVessel Indicator: 10000Gallons: Unleaded GasContent Description: Unleaded gasSubstance: 01-APR-1985Install Date: 17-SEP-2007Status Date: RemovedStatus: 1Tank Id: Tank Info: (407) 327-6584Owner Phone: STEPHANIE MONICA | 407-346-1900Owner Contact: WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708Owner City,St,Zip: WINTER SPRINGS CITY-CITY HALL (Continued) U001374552 TC05335716.2r Page 41 388 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: CDEP CO: Local GovernmentType Description: HFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (407) 327-1800Facility Phone: 8731664Facility ID: 3Region: FL Financial Assurance 3: Click here for Florida Oculus: Suction piping systemPiping Description: Miscellaneous AttributesPiping Category: 3Tank ID: Abv, no soil contactPiping Description: Miscellaneous AttributesPiping Category: 3Tank ID: External protective coatingPiping Description: Corrosion ProtectionPiping Category: 3Tank ID: Steel/galvanized metalPiping Description: Primary ConstructionPiping Category: 3Tank ID: Piping: Monitor tank bottom spaceMonitoring Description: 3Tank ID: Visual inspection of ASTsMonitoring Description: 3Tank ID: Monitoring: Double wall - tank jacketConstruction Description: Secondary ContainmentConstruction Category: 3Tank Id: Level gauges/alarmsConstruction Description: Overfill/SpillConstruction Category: 3Tank Id: Spill containment bucketConstruction Description: Overfill/SpillConstruction Category: 3Tank Id: SteelConstruction Description: Primary ConstructionConstruction Category: 3Tank Id: Construction: ABOVEGROUNDTank Location: WINTER SPRINGS CITY-CITY HALL (Continued) U001374552 TC05335716.2r Page 42 389 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: CDEP CO: Local GovernmentType Description: HFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (407) 327-1800Facility Phone: 8731664Facility ID: 3Region: (407) 327-6584Resp Party Phone: STEPHANIE MONICA | 407-346-1900Contact: WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708Owner City,St,Zip: ATTN: STORAGE TANK REGISOwner Address2: 1126 E SR 434Owner Address: WINTER SPRINGS CITYOnwer Name: 24225Owner ID: 09-NOV-2018Expire Date: 09-NOV-2017Effective Date: COMMERCE & INDUSTRY INSURANCE COInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: CDEP CO: Local GovernmentType Description: HFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (407) 327-1800Facility Phone: 8731664Facility ID: 3Region: (407) 327-6584Resp Party Phone: STEPHANIE MONICA | 407-346-1900Contact: WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708Owner City,St,Zip: ATTN: STORAGE TANK REGISOwner Address2: 1126 E SR 434Owner Address: WINTER SPRINGS CITYOnwer Name: 24225Owner ID: 09-NOV-2009Expire Date: 09-NOV-2008Effective Date: COMMERCE & INDUSTRYInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: CDEP CO: Local GovernmentType Description: HFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (407) 327-1800Facility Phone: 8731664Facility ID: 3Region: (407) 327-6584Resp Party Phone: STEPHANIE MONICA | 407-346-1900Contact: WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708Owner City,St,Zip: ATTN: STORAGE TANK REGISOwner Address2: 1126 E SR 434Owner Address: WINTER SPRINGS CITYOnwer Name: 24225Owner ID: 09-NOV-2015Expire Date: 09-NOV-2014Effective Date: COMMERCE & INDUSTRYInsurance Company: WINTER SPRINGS CITY-CITY HALL (Continued) U001374552 TC05335716.2r Page 43 390 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: CDEP CO: Local GovernmentType Description: HFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (407) 327-1800Facility Phone: 8731664Facility ID: 3Region: (407) 327-6584Resp Party Phone: STEPHANIE MONICA | 407-346-1900Contact: WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708Owner City,St,Zip: ATTN: STORAGE TANK REGISOwner Address2: 1126 E SR 434Owner Address: WINTER SPRINGS CITYOnwer Name: 24225Owner ID: 09-NOV-2011Expire Date: 09-NOV-2011Effective Date: COMMERCE & INDUSTRYInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: CDEP CO: Local GovernmentType Description: HFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (407) 327-1800Facility Phone: 8731664Facility ID: 3Region: (407) 327-6584Resp Party Phone: STEPHANIE MONICA | 407-346-1900Contact: WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708Owner City,St,Zip: ATTN: STORAGE TANK REGISOwner Address2: 1126 E SR 434Owner Address: WINTER SPRINGS CITYOnwer Name: 24225Owner ID: 09-NOV-2012Expire Date: 09-NOV-2011Effective Date: COMMERCE & INDUSTRYInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: CDEP CO: Local GovernmentType Description: HFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (407) 327-1800Facility Phone: 8731664Facility ID: 3Region: (407) 327-6584Resp Party Phone: STEPHANIE MONICA | 407-346-1900Contact: WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708Owner City,St,Zip: ATTN: STORAGE TANK REGISOwner Address2: 1126 E SR 434Owner Address: WINTER SPRINGS CITYOnwer Name: 24225Owner ID: 09-NOV-2017Expire Date: 09-NOV-2016Effective Date: COMMERCE & INDUSTRY INSURANCE COInsurance Company: WINTER SPRINGS CITY-CITY HALL (Continued) U001374552 TC05335716.2r Page 44 391 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: CDEP CO: Local GovernmentType Description: HFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (407) 327-1800Facility Phone: 8731664Facility ID: 3Region: (407) 327-6584Resp Party Phone: STEPHANIE MONICA | 407-346-1900Contact: WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708Owner City,St,Zip: ATTN: STORAGE TANK REGISOwner Address2: 1126 E SR 434Owner Address: WINTER SPRINGS CITYOnwer Name: 24225Owner ID: 09-NOV-2014Expire Date: 09-NOV-2013Effective Date: COMMERCE & INDUSTRYInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: CDEP CO: Local GovernmentType Description: HFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (407) 327-1800Facility Phone: 8731664Facility ID: 3Region: (407) 327-6584Resp Party Phone: STEPHANIE MONICA | 407-346-1900Contact: WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708Owner City,St,Zip: ATTN: STORAGE TANK REGISOwner Address2: 1126 E SR 434Owner Address: WINTER SPRINGS CITYOnwer Name: 24225Owner ID: 09-NOV-2013Expire Date: 09-NOV-2012Effective Date: COMMERCE & INDUSTRYInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: CDEP CO: Local GovernmentType Description: HFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (407) 327-1800Facility Phone: 8731664Facility ID: 3Region: (407) 327-6584Resp Party Phone: STEPHANIE MONICA | 407-346-1900Contact: WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708Owner City,St,Zip: ATTN: STORAGE TANK REGISOwner Address2: 1126 E SR 434Owner Address: WINTER SPRINGS CITYOnwer Name: 24225Owner ID: 09-NOV-2011Expire Date: 09-NOV-2010Effective Date: COMMERCE & INDUSTRYInsurance Company: WINTER SPRINGS CITY-CITY HALL (Continued) U001374552 TC05335716.2r Page 45 392 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation (407) 327-6584Resp Party Phone: STEPHANIE MONICA | 407-346-1900Contact: WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708Owner City,St,Zip: ATTN: STORAGE TANK REGISOwner Address2: 1126 E SR 434Owner Address: WINTER SPRINGS CITYOnwer Name: 24225Owner ID: 09-NOV-2010Expire Date: 09-NOV-2009Effective Date: COMMERCE & INDUSTRYInsurance Company: INSURANCEFinaincial Responsibility: CDEP CO: Local GovernmentType Description: HFacility Type: OPENFacility Status: (407) 327-1800Facility Phone: 8731664Facility ID: 3Region: (407) 327-6584Resp Party Phone: STEPHANIE MONICA | 407-346-1900Contact: WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708Owner City,St,Zip: ATTN: STORAGE TANK REGISOwner Address2: 1126 E SR 434Owner Address: WINTER SPRINGS CITYOnwer Name: 24225Owner ID: 09-NOV-2016Expire Date: 09-NOV-2015Effective Date: COMMERCE & INDUSTRYInsurance Company: WINTER SPRINGS CITY-CITY HALL (Continued) U001374552 TC05335716.2r Page 46 393 ORPHAN SUMMARYCityEDR IDSite NameSite AddressZipDatabase(s)Count: 0 records.NO SITES FOUNDTC05335716.2r Page 47394 To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required. Number of Days to Update:Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days from the date the government agency made the information available to the public. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL: National Priority List National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) and regional EPA offices. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/22/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL Site Boundaries Sources: EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) Telephone: 202-564-7333 EPA Region 1 EPA Region 6 Telephone 617-918-1143 Telephone: 214-655-6659 EPA Region 3 EPA Region 7 Telephone 215-814-5418 Telephone: 913-551-7247 EPA Region 4 EPA Region 8 Telephone 404-562-8033 Telephone: 303-312-6774 EPA Region 5 EPA Region 9 Telephone 312-886-6686 Telephone: 415-947-4246 EPA Region 10 Telephone 206-553-8665 Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/22/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4267 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC05335716.2r Page GR-1 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 395 Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/22/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal CERCLIS list FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities. Date of Government Version: 11/07/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/05/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017 Number of Days to Update: 92 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8704 Last EDR Contact: 04/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites, and remedial activities performed in support of EPA’s Superfund Program across the United States. The list was formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Government Version: 01/09/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 66 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/30/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive TC05335716.2r Page GR-2 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 396 SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP, renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the location is not judged to be potential NPL site. Date of Government Version: 01/09/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 66 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/30/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 03/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (404) 562-8651 Last EDR Contact: 03/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (404) 562-8651 Last EDR Contact: 03/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC05335716.2r Page GR-3 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 397 RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (404) 562-8651 Last EDR Contact: 03/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-CESQG: RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (404) 562-8651 Last EDR Contact: 03/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure properties. Date of Government Version: 02/16/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/22/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Department of the Navy Telephone: 843-820-7326 Last EDR Contact: 05/09/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/27/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Date of Government Version: 02/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 05/29/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls. Date of Government Version: 02/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 05/29/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC05335716.2r Page GR-4 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 398 Federal ERNS list ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. Date of Government Version: 03/19/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/08/2018 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Telephone: 202-267-2180 Last EDR Contact: 03/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS SHWS: Florida’s State-Funded Action Sites State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states’ equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds (state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially responsible parties. Available information varies by state. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/21/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-488-0190 Last EDR Contact: 05/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF: Solid Waste Facility Database Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Government Version: 04/16/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/17/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/24/2018 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-922-7121 Last EDR Contact: 04/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/30/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST: Petroleum Contamination Detail Report Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports. LUST records contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. Not all states maintain these records, and the information stored varies by state. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/04/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8839 Last EDR Contact: 05/01/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LAST: Leaking Aboveground Storage Tank Listing The file for Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks. Please remember STCM does not track the source of the discharge so the agency provides a list of facilities with an aboveground tank and an open discharge split by facilities with aboveground tanks only and facilities with aboveground and underground tanks. Date of Government Version: 04/26/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/01/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8799 Last EDR Contact: 04/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC05335716.2r Page GR-5 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 399 INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. Date of Government Version: 10/24/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada Date of Government Version: 09/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 415-972-3372 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming. Date of Government Version: 10/12/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6271 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska Date of Government Version: 10/12/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma. Date of Government Version: 01/06/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-6597 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land. Date of Government Version: 10/14/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: EPA Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 10/16/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: EPA, Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-7439 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC05335716.2r Page GR-6 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 400 INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina. Date of Government Version: 10/14/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-8677 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies State and tribal registered storage tank lists FF TANKS: Federal Facilities Listing A listing of federal facilities with storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 03/21/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8250 Last EDR Contact: 03/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 05/15/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 136 Source: FEMA Telephone: 202-646-5797 Last EDR Contact: 04/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies UST: Storage Tank Facility Information Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST’s are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available information varies by state program. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/03/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/21/2018 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8839 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly AST: Storage Tank Facility Information Registered Aboveground Storage Tanks. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/03/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/21/2018 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8839 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 09/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3368 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC05335716.2r Page GR-7 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 401 INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 10/14/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 10/24/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 01/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes). Date of Government Version: 04/24/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/08/2017 Number of Days to Update: 134 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-7591 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 10/16/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: EPA Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-6136 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Tribal Nations) Date of Government Version: 10/14/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-9424 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC05335716.2r Page GR-8 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 402 INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 10/12/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6137 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TANKS: Storage Tank Facility List This listing includes storage tank facilities that do not have tank information. The tanks have either be closed or removed from the site, but the facilities were still registered at some point in history. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/03/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/21/2018 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8841 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries ENG CONTROLS: Institutional Controls Registry The registry is a database of all contaminated sites in the state of Florida which are subject to engineering controls. Engineering Controls encompass a variety of engineered remedies to contain and/or reduce contamination, and/or physical barriers intended to limit access to property. ECs include fences, signs, guards, landfill caps, provision of potable water, slurry walls, sheet pile (vertical caps), pumping and treatment of groundwater, monitoring wells, and vapor extraction systems. Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/04/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/24/2018 Number of Days to Update: 20 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8927 Last EDR Contact: 04/04/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Inst Control: Institutional Controls Registry The registry is a database of all contaminated sites in the state of Florida which are subject to institutional and engineering controls. Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/04/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/24/2018 Number of Days to Update: 20 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8927 Last EDR Contact: 04/04/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites VCP: Voluntary Cleanup Sites Listing of closed and active voluntary cleanup sites. Date of Government Version: 03/20/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/22/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8705 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1. TC05335716.2r Page GR-9 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 403 Date of Government Version: 07/27/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016 Number of Days to Update: 142 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1102 Last EDR Contact: 03/21/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7. Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA, Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7365 Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009 Data Release Frequency: Varies State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS AREAS: Brownfields Areas Database A "brownfield area" means a contiguous area of one or more brownfield sites, some of which may not be contaminated, that has been designated as such by a local government resolution. Such areas may include all or portions of community redevelopment areas, enterprise zones, empowerment zones, other such designated economically deprived communities and areas, and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) designated brownfield pilot projects. This layer provides a polygon representation of the boundaries of these designated Brownfield Areas in Florida. Date of Government Version: 02/28/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/04/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/30/2018 Number of Days to Update: 26 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8934 Last EDR Contact: 04/04/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly BSRA: Brownfield Site Rehabilitation Agreements Listing The BSRA provides DEP and the public assurance that site rehabilitation will be conducted in accordance with Florida Statutes and DEP’s Contaminated Site Cleanup Criteria rule. In addition, the BSRA provides limited liability protection for the voluntary responsible party. The BSRA contains various commitments by the voluntary responsible party, including milestones for completion of site rehabilitation tasks and submittal of technical reports and plans. It also contains a commitment by DEP to review technical reports according to an agreed upon schedule. Only those brownfield sites with an executed BSRA are eligible to apply for a voluntary cleanup tax credit incentive pursuant to Section 376.30781, Florida Statutes. Date of Government Version: 02/21/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/04/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/30/2018 Number of Days to Update: 26 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8934 Last EDR Contact: 04/04/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields Sites Database Brownfields are defined by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) as abandoned, idled, or underused industrial and commercial facilities where expansion or redevelopment is complicated by real or perceived environmental contamination. Date of Government Version: 02/25/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/04/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/30/2018 Number of Days to Update: 26 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8927 Last EDR Contact: 04/04/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists TC05335716.2r Page GR-10 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 404 US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment. Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs. Date of Government Version: 03/19/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/08/2018 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-2777 Last EDR Contact: 03/21/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/02/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites SWRCY: Recycling Centers A listing of recycling centers located in the state of Florida. Date of Government Version: 01/10/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/16/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8718 Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/30/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Location of open dumps on Indian land. Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-8245 Last EDR Contact: 01/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/14/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside County and northern Imperial County, California. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Number of Days to Update: 137 Source: EPA, Region 9 Telephone: 415-947-4219 Last EDR Contact: 04/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned ODI: Open Dump Inventory An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258 Subtitle D Criteria. Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States. TC05335716.2r Page GR-11 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 405 Date of Government Version: 04/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 176 Source: Department of Health & Human Serivces, Indian Health Service Telephone: 301-443-1452 Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory Register. Date of Government Version: 02/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 71 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned PRIORITYCLEANERS: Priority Ranking List The Florida Legislature has established a state-funded program to cleanup properties that are contaminated as a result of the operations of a drycleaning facility. Date of Government Version: 04/04/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/16/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8927 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/27/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies FL SITES: Sites List This summary status report was developed from a number of lists including the Eckhardt list, the Moffit list, the EPA Hazardous Waste Sites list, EPA’s Emergency & Remedial Response information System list (RCRA Section 3012) & existing department lists such as the obsolete uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sites list. This list is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 12/31/1989 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/04/1994 Number of Days to Update: 87 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8705 Last EDR Contact: 03/24/1994 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 02/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 71 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Local Land Records LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information A Federal CERCLA (’Superfund’) lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination. CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties. TC05335716.2r Page GR-12 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 406 Date of Government Version: 01/09/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 94 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT. Date of Government Version: 03/26/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/08/2018 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: U.S. Department of Transportation Telephone: 202-366-4555 Last EDR Contact: 03/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SPILLS: Oil and Hazardous Materials Incidents Statewide oil and hazardous materials inland incidents. Date of Government Version: 04/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/03/2018 Number of Days to Update: 20 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-2010 Last EDR Contact: 04/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically, they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90. Date of Government Version: 12/10/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/04/2013 Number of Days to Update: 60 Source: FirstSearch Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SPILLS 80: SPILLS80 data from FirstSearch Spills 80 includes those spill and release records available from FirstSearch databases prior to 1990. Typically, they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded before 1990. Duplicate records that are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 80. Date of Government Version: 09/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: FirstSearch Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (404) 562-8651 Last EDR Contact: 03/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC05335716.2r Page GR-13 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 407 FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions. Date of Government Version: 01/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 97 Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Telephone: 202-528-4285 Last EDR Contact: 05/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOD: Department of Defense Sites This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: USGS Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 04/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land, Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 339 Source: U.S. Geological Survey Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 04/11/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: N/A SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 615-532-8599 Last EDR Contact: 05/15/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/27/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post-closure care of their facilities. Date of Government Version: 01/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/19/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2018 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-1917 Last EDR Contact: 03/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST EPA maintains a "Watch List" to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved. TC05335716.2r Page GR-14 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 408 Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 617-520-3000 Last EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly 2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation. Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations. Date of Government Version: 04/22/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-4044 Last EDR Contact: 05/08/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/21/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 198 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-260-5521 Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/02/2018 Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/10/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2018 Number of Days to Update: 2 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0250 Last EDR Contact: 05/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2011 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4203 Last EDR Contact: 04/09/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually ROD: Records Of Decision Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version: 01/09/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 94 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-416-0223 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC05335716.2r Page GR-15 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 409 RMP: Risk Management Plans When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur. Date of Government Version: 11/02/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/17/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/08/2017 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-8600 Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database. Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4104 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/17/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 3 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PADS: PCB Activity Database System PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers of PCB’s who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Date of Government Version: 06/01/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/09/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 126 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0500 Last EDR Contact: 04/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Date of Government Version: 11/18/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 04/09/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC05335716.2r Page GR-16 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 410 FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/08/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/21/2016 Number of Days to Update: 43 Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone: 301-415-7169 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly COAL ASH DOE: Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-8719 Last EDR Contact: 06/07/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/04/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals. Date of Government Version: 05/24/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-0517 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies RADINFO: Radiation Information Database The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity. TC05335716.2r Page GR-17 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 411 Date of Government Version: 01/03/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/04/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 99 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-343-9775 Last EDR Contact: 04/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data. Date of Government Version: 07/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2012 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Telephone: 202-366-4595 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library Telephone: Varies Last EDR Contact: 04/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/02/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies BRS: Biennial Reporting System The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/22/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2017 Number of Days to Update: 218 Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 05/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Biennially TC05335716.2r Page GR-18 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 412 INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 546 Source: USGS Telephone: 202-208-3710 Last EDR Contact: 04/11/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations. Date of Government Version: 12/23/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/27/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/17/2017 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-3559 Last EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized. Date of Government Version: 06/23/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/11/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 23 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 505-845-0011 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites A listing of former lead smelter site locations. Date of Government Version: 01/09/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2018 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8787 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: American Journal of Public Health Telephone: 703-305-6451 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS) The database is a sub-system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants, steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action, air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants. TC05335716.2r Page GR-19 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 413 Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 100 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data A listing of minor source facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 100 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually US MINES: Mines Master Index File Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes violation information. Date of Government Version: 01/25/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Telephone: 303-231-5959 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing This map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as iron ore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, such as gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States. Date of Government Version: 12/05/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/29/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/18/2008 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-7709 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team of the USGS. Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011 Number of Days to Update: 97 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-7709 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies ABANDONED MINES: Abandoned Mines An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily coal mining) is maintained by OSMRE to provide information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The inventory contains information on the location, type, and extent of AML impacts, as well as, information on the cost associated with the reclamation of those problems. The inventory is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing problems are reclaimed. Date of Government Version: 03/08/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/08/2018 Number of Days to Update: 87 Source: Department of Interior Telephone: 202-208-2609 Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC05335716.2r Page GR-20 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 414 FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and ’pointers’ to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System). Date of Government Version: 02/21/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/23/2018 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: EPA Telephone: (404) 562-9900 Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly ECHO: Enforcement & Compliance History Information ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide. Date of Government Version: 02/25/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/17/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/08/2018 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2280 Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations Date of Government Version: 09/30/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/31/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2018 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: Department of Defense Telephone: 703-704-1564 Last EDR Contact: 04/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/30/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities. Date of Government Version: 01/04/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/19/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-0527 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80 (Code of Federal Regulations) EPA Fuels Programs. All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations. Date of Government Version: 02/20/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/21/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/23/2018 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-385-6164 Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly AIRS: Permitted Facilities Listing A listing of Air Resources Management permits. Date of Government Version: 04/27/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/02/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/01/2018 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-921-9558 Last EDR Contact: 04/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC05335716.2r Page GR-21 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 415 ASBESTOS: Asbestos Notification Listing Asbestos sites Date of Government Version: 02/15/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/20/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 43 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-717-9086 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies CLEANUP SITES: DEP Cleanup Sites - Contamination Locator Map Listing This listing includes the locations of waste cleanup sites from various programs. The source of the cleanup site data includes Hazardous Waste programs, Site Investigation Section, Compliance and Enforcement Tracking, Drycleaning State Funded Cleanup Program (possibly other state funded cleanup), Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring. Date of Government Version: 02/25/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 866-282-0787 Last EDR Contact: 05/29/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly DEDB: Ethylene Dibromide Database Results Ethylene dibromide (EDB), a soil fumigant, that has been detected in drinking water wells. The amount found exceeds the maximum contaminant level as stated in Chapter 62-550 or 520. It is a potential threat to public health when present in drinking water. Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/03/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/24/2018 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8335 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEANERS: Drycleaning Facilities The Drycleaners database, maintained by the Department of Environmental Protection, provides information about permitted dry cleaner facilities. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/21/2018 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8927 Last EDR Contact: 04/24/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually DWM CONTAM: DWM CONTAMINATED SITES A listing of active or known sites. The listing includes sites that need cleanup but are not actively being working on because the agency currently does not have funding (primarily petroleum and drycleaning). Date of Government Version: 09/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/31/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-7503 Last EDR Contact: 05/21/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing A list of hazardous waste facilities required to provide financial assurance under RCRA. Date of Government Version: 04/26/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/01/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/21/2018 Number of Days to Update: 20 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8793 Last EDR Contact: 04/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TC05335716.2r Page GR-22 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 416 Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information for solid waste facilities. Date of Government Version: 04/27/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/02/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/21/2018 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8743 Last EDR Contact: 04/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Financial Assurance 3: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information for storage tanks sites. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/03/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8853 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FL Cattle Dip. Vats: Cattle Dipping Vats From the 1910’s through the 1950’s, these vats were filled with an arsenic solution for the control and eradication of the cattle fever tick. Other pesticides, such as DDT, were also widely used. By State law, all cattle, horses, mules, goats, and other susceptible animals were required to be dipped every 14 days. Under certain circumstances, the arsenic and other pesticides remaining at the site may present an environmental or public health hazard. Date of Government Version: 01/19/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/09/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-4444 Last EDR Contact: 04/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned RESP PARTY: Responsible Party Sites Listing Open, inactive and closed responsible party sites Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/04/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/24/2018 Number of Days to Update: 20 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8758 Last EDR Contact: 04/04/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SITE INV SITES: Site Investigation Section Sites Listing Statewide coverage of Site Investigation Section (SIS) sites. Site Investigation is a Section within the Bureau of Waste Cleanup, Division of Waste Management. SIS provides technical support to FDEP District Waste Cleanup Programs and conducts contamination assessments throughout the state. Date of Government Version: 02/20/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/21/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8953 Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TIER 2: Tier 2 Facility Listing A listing of facilities which store or manufacture hazardous materials that submit a chemical inventory report. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/23/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-413-9970 Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC05335716.2r Page GR-23 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 417 UIC: Underground Injection Wells Database Listing A listing of Class I wells. Class I wells are used to inject hazardous waste, nonhazardous waste, or municipal waste below the lowermost USDW. Date of Government Version: 04/18/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8655 Last EDR Contact: 04/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies WASTEWATER: Wastewater Facility Regulation Database Domestic and industrial wastewater facilities. Date of Government Version: 05/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8600 Last EDR Contact: 05/08/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’s to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil and groundwater contamination. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. TC05335716.2r Page GR-24 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 418 Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA HWS: Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste database provides a list of SHWS incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environmental Protection in Floridia. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2013 Number of Days to Update: 182 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environmental Protection in Floridia. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2014 Number of Days to Update: 193 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environmental Protection in Floridia. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2013 Number of Days to Update: 182 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies COUNTY RECORDS ALACHUA COUNTY: Facility List List of all regulated facilities in Alachua County. Date of Government Version: 03/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: Alachua County Environmental Protection Department Telephone: 352-264-6800 Last EDR Contact: 03/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually BROWARD COUNTY: TC05335716.2r Page GR-25 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 419 Aboveground Storage Tanks Aboveground storage tank locations in Broward County. Date of Government Version: 12/04/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/19/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/26/2018 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: Broward County Environmental Protection Department Telephone: 954-818-7509 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies Semi-Annual Inventory Report on Contaminated Locations Early Detection Incentive/Environmental Assessment Remediation. This report monitors the status and remediation progress of known contaminated locations within Broward County. Sites listed by the US EPA, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and sites licensed for contamination assessment and cleanup by the Division of Pollution Prevention and Remediation Programs of the Department. Date of Government Version: 02/26/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Broward County Environmental Protection Department Telephone: 954-818-7509 Last EDR Contact: 05/29/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Underground Storage Tanks All known regulated storage tanks within Broward County, including those tanks that have been closed Date of Government Version: 12/04/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/19/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/26/2018 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: Broward County Environmental Protection Department Telephone: 954-818-7509 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY: Hillsborough County LF Hillsborough county landfill sites. Date of Government Version: 01/04/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/09/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Hillsborough County Environmental Protection Commission Telephone: 813-627-2600 Last EDR Contact: 04/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies MIAMI-DADE COUNTY: Air Permit Sites Facilities that release or have a potential to release pollutants. Date of Government Version: 02/26/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: Department of Environmental Resources Management Telephone: 305-372-6755 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Agricultural Waste Listing A listing of agricultural waste sites Date of Government Version: 02/26/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: Miami-Dade County Division of Environmental Resources Management Telephone: 305-372-6715 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC05335716.2r Page GR-26 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 420 Liquid Waste Transporter List The Liquid Waste Transporter permit regulates the transportation of various types of liquid and solid waste, including hazardous waste, waste oil and oily waste waters, septic and grease trap waste, biomedical waste, spent radiator fluid, photo chemical waste, dry sewage sludge, and other types of non-hazardous industrial waste. The Liquid Waste Transporter permits needed to protect the environment and the public from improperly handled and transported waste. Date of Government Version: 02/26/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: DERM Telephone: 305-372-6755 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Marine Facilities Operating Permit What is this permit used for? Miami-Dade County Ordinance 89-104 and Section 24-18 of the Code of Miami-Dade County require the following types of marine facilities to obtain annual operating permits from DERM: All recreational boat docking facilities with ten (10) or more boat slips, moorings, davit spaces, and vessel tie-up spaces. All boat storage facilities contiguous to tidal waters in Miami-Dade County with ten (10) or more dry storage spaces including boatyards and boat manufacturing facilities. Date of Government Version: 02/26/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: DERM Telephone: 305-372-3576 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Maimi River Enforcement The Miami River Enforcement database files were created for facilities and in some instances vessels that were inspected by a workgroup within the Department that was identified as the Miami River Enforcement Group. The files do not all necessarily reflect enforcement cases and some were created for locations that were permitted by other Sections within the Department. Date of Government Version: 06/05/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/06/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/06/2013 Number of Days to Update: 61 Source: DERM Telephone: 305-372-3576 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Industrial Waste Permit Sites Facilities that either generate more than 25,000 of wastewater per day to sanitary sewers or are pre-defined by EPA. Date of Government Version: 02/26/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Department of Environmental Resources Management Telephone: 305-372-6700 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Enforcement Case Tracking System Sites Enforcement cases monitored by the Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management. Date of Government Version: 02/26/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Department of Environmental Resources Management Telephone: 305-372-6755 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Fuel Spills Cases DERM documents fuel spills of sites that are not in a state program. TC05335716.2r Page GR-27 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 421 Date of Government Version: 01/08/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/13/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/05/2009 Number of Days to Update: 23 Source: Department of Environmental Resources Management Telephone: 305-372-6755 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Storage Tanks A listing of aboveground and underground storage tank site locations. Date of Government Version: 02/26/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: Department of Environmental Resource Management Telephone: 305-372-6700 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually PALM BEACH COUNTY: Palm Beach County LF Palm Beach County Inventory of Solid Waste Sites. Date of Government Version: 09/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/20/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/10/2011 Number of Days to Update: 20 Source: Palm Beach County Solid Waste Authority Telephone: 561-640-4000 Last EDR Contact: 06/15/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies OTHER DATABASE(S) Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a tsd facility. Date of Government Version: 01/03/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection Telephone: 860-424-3375 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/27/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/11/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/27/2017 Number of Days to Update: 107 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 04/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD facility. TC05335716.2r Page GR-28 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 422 Date of Government Version: 04/30/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/03/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/07/2018 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-8651 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/25/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/25/2017 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 717-783-8990 Last EDR Contact: 04/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/30/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually RI MANIFEST: Manifest information Hazardous waste manifest information Date of Government Version: 12/31/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 401-222-2797 Last EDR Contact: 05/21/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/13/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2017 Number of Days to Update: 92 Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually Oil/Gas Pipelines Source: PennWell Corporation Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. Electric Power Transmission Line Data Source: PennWell Corporation This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers, and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located. AHA Hospitals: Source: American Hospital Association, Inc. Telephone: 312-280-5991 The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association’s annual survey of hospitals. Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Telephone: 410-786-3000 A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Nursing Homes Source: National Institutes of Health Telephone: 301-594-6248 Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States. TC05335716.2r Page GR-29 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 423 Public Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are comparable across all states. Private Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on private school locations in the United States. Daycare Centers: Department of Children & Families Source: Provider Information Telephone: 850-488-4900 Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL. Source: FEMA Telephone: 877-336-2627 Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015 NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetlands Inventory Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8238 Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC05335716.2r Page GR-30 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 424 TC05335716.2r Page A-1 geologic strata. of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics 2. Groundwater flow velocity. 1. Groundwater flow direction, and Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principal investigative components: forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration. EDR’s GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in 2012Version Date: 5656135 OVIEDO, FLEast Map: 2012Version Date: 5656107 CASSELBERRY, FLTarget Property Map: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP 41 ft. above sea levelElevation: 3174213.8UTM Y (Meters): 474449.7UTM X (Meters): Zone 17Universal Tranverse Mercator: 81.261558 - 81˚ 15’ 41.61’’Longitude (West): 28.696494 - 28˚ 41’ 47.38’’Latitude (North): TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708 NEC SR 434 AND TUSCAWILLA ROAD NEC SR 434 AND TUSCAWILLA ROAD TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM® 425 TC05335716.2r Page A-2 should be field verified. on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES Elevation (ft)Elevation (ft)TP TP 0 1/2 1 Miles✩Target Property Elevation: 41 ft. North South West East545456555247424141413842413225121112424242323243441454127157233334General EastGeneral Topographic Gradient: TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers). sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® 426 TC05335716.2r Page A-3 Not Reported GENERAL DIRECTIONLOCATION GROUNDWATER FLOWFROM TPMAP ID hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table. authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater AQUIFLOW® Search Radius: 1.000 Mile. Not found Status: 1.25 miles Search Radius: Site-Specific Hydrogeological Data*: * ©1996 Site-specific hydrogeological data gathered by CERCLIS Alerts, Inc., Bainbridge Island, WA. All rights reserved. All of the information and opinions presented are those of the cited EPA report(s), which were completed under a Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) investigation. contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail MapCASSELBERRY NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY NWI Electronic Data CoverageNWI Quad at Target Property FEMA FIRM Flood data12117C0190F FEMA FIRM Flood data12117C0170F FEMA FIRM Flood data12117C0180F Additional Panels in search area:FEMA Source Type FEMA FIRM Flood data12117C0160F Flood Plain Panel at Target Property FEMA Source Type FEMA FLOOD ZONE and bodies of water). Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® 427 TC05335716.2r Page A-4 > 60 inchesDepth to Bedrock Max: > 60 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: LOW Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Soil does not meet the requirements for a hydric soil. low water holding capacity. Depth to water table is more than 6 feet. Excessively. Soils have very high and high hydraulic conductivity andSoil Drainage Class: excessively drained sands and gravels. Class A - High infiltration rates. Soils are deep, well drained toHydrologic Group: fine sandSoil Surface Texture: CANDLER Soil Component Name: The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data. in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps. for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION Stratifed SequenceCategory:CenozoicEra: QuaternarySystem: HoloceneSeries: QhCode: (decoded above as Era, System & Series) at which contaminant migration may be occurring. Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils. characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® 428 TC05335716.2r Page A-5 fine sandy loam sandy clay loam fine sand sandDeeper Soil Types: sandy loam loamy sand sandy clay loamShallow Soil Types: No Other Soil TypesSurficial Soil Types: No Other Soil TypesSoil Surface Textures: appear within the general area of target property. Based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data, the following additional subordinant soil types may OTHER SOIL TYPES IN AREA Min: 4.50 Max: 6.00 Min: 2.00 Max: 6.00 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularsandy loam99 inches95 inches 4 Min: 4.50 Max: 6.00 Min: 6.00 Max: 20.00 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED sand. Poorly graded Clean Sands, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Sand. 200), Fine passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularsand95 inches67 inches 3 Min: 4.50 Max: 6.00 Min: 6.00 Max: 20.00 sand. Poorly graded Clean Sands, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Sand. 200), Fine passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularsand67 inches 5 inches 2 Min: 4.50 Max: 6.00 Min: 6.00 Max: 20.00 sand. Poorly graded Clean Sands, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Sand. 200), Fine passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularfine sand 5 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Permeability Rate (in/hr) Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® 429 TC05335716.2r Page A-6 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WestFLSA80000075617 F21 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NNWFLSA80000004735 20 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WestFLSA80000075615 F19 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WestFLSA80000075614 F18 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WSWFLSA80000075622 D17 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SWFLSA80000075619 E16 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SWFLSA80000075618 E15 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSWFLSA80000019973 14 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WNWFLSA80000019919 C13 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NWFLSA80000019918 C12 1/8 - 1/4 Mile WSWFLSA80000075624 B11 1/8 - 1/4 Mile WSWFLSA80000075623 B10 1/8 - 1/4 Mile SWFLSA80000075626 B9 1/8 - 1/4 Mile WSWFLSA80000075613 D8 1/8 - 1/4 Mile WSWFLSA80000075612 D7 1/8 - 1/4 Mile WSWFLSA80000072744 B6 1/8 - 1/4 Mile NorthFLSA80000019916 5 1/8 - 1/4 Mile WNWFLSA80000019920 C4 1/8 - 1/4 Mile SWFLSA80000019917 A2 0 - 1/8 Mile WSWFLSA80000007434 A1 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location. 1/8 - 1/4 Mile SWFL3594152 B3 FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID No Wells Found FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID 1.000State Database Nearest PWS within 1 mileFederal FRDS PWS 1.000Federal USGS WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)DATABASE opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells. professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® 430 TC05335716.2r Page A-7 1/2 - 1 Mile NWFLSJ80000030614 47 1/2 - 1 Mile SouthFLSJ80000024850 K46 1/2 - 1 Mile SouthFLSJ80000014652 K45 1/2 - 1 Mile SouthFLSA80000064026 44 1/2 - 1 Mile NNEFLSA80000064031 43 1/2 - 1 Mile SSEFLSJ80000009806 J42 1/2 - 1 Mile NWFLSJ80000034176 I41 1/2 - 1 Mile NWFLSJ80000009197 I40 1/2 - 1 Mile NWFLSA80000000496 I39 1/2 - 1 Mile SSEFLSJ80000042490 J38 1/2 - 1 Mile SSEFLSJ80000042249 J37 1/2 - 1 Mile NWFLSA80000004734 I36 1/2 - 1 Mile SSEFLSJ80000050884 H35 1/2 - 1 Mile SSEFLSJ80000046144 H34 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NWFLSJ80000038971 I33 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NWFLSJ80000062510 I32 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NWFLSJ80000012433 I31 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NWFLSJ80000037006 I30 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSWFLSA80000070479 29 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SouthFLSA80000072221 H28 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SouthFLSJ80000009934 H27 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SouthFLSJ80000003410 H26 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WSWFLSA80000075621 G25 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WSWFLSA80000075620 G24 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WSWFLSA80000077031 F23 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WestFLSA80000075616 F22 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® 431 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.4040404040 40404 0 FL 432 TC05335716.2r Page A-9 Not ReportedLast name:Not ReportedFirst name: LAKE JESSUP ANIMAL HOSPITALName:YesSanit seal: Not ReportedComment : Not ReportedPermit num:4Diameter: 0Length: 0Well depth: 28.69527Latitude: -81.2632Longitude: Black SteelCasing mat:ACTIVEStatus: 42Well type:AAF0830Fluwid: A2 SW 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Higher FLSA80000019917FL WELLS FLSA80000007434Site id: 0Pws verify: 0Pws design: Not ReportedParcel id: Not ReportedAgency:Not ReportedStreetside: Not ReportedSoftware:Not ReportedOther id: Not ReportedRes type:POTABLEPort stat: Not ReportedAction:Not ReportedWsrp id: 284262Gps id: 284262Loc id: WINTER SPRINGSCity:32708Zipcode: Not ReportedPostdir:RDSuffix: TUSKAWILLAStreet:Not ReportedPrefix: Not ReportedPredir:170Number : 170 TUSKAWILLA RDAddress:SEMINOLECounty: Not ReportedProperty i:Not ReportedReq numb: Not ReportedInsp chd:Not ReportedInsp lname: Not ReportedInsp fname:SUPERProject id: DGPSLoc method:02-NOV-00Gps date: 16.16Hae: WS1984Datum: 0Lg pws: Not ReportedPhone ext:Not ReportedPhone: Not ReportedLast name:Not ReportedFirst name: PINCH A PENNYName:YesSanit seal: OWNER OF THE BUSINESS REFUSED SAMPLINGComment : Not ReportedPermit num:4Diameter: 0Length: 0Well depth: 28.69623Latitude: -81.26292Longitude: Black SteelCasing mat:ACTIVEStatus: 42Well type:AAC0779Fluwid: A1 WSW 0 - 1/8 Mile Higher FLSA80000007434FL WELLS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 433 TC05335716.2r Page A-10 Not ReportedZipserv:FLStateserv: Not ReportedCntyserv:Not ReportedCityserv: 407-327-1217Phone:32708Zip: FLState:WINTER SPRINGSCity: Not ReportedAdd2: CNR OF TUSKAWILLA & 434Add1: 26Popserved: GWPrimsrccd:TNCWSPwstypcd: HANDY WAY #3333/CASSELBERRYName: Location Information: IActivity code: 32708Contact zip:FLContact state: WINTER SPRINGSContact city:Not ReportedContact address2: CNR OF TUSKAWILLA & 434Contact address1:407-327-1217Contact phone: Not ReportedContactor gname: Not ReportedContact: PrivateOwner:TNCWSPws type: GroundwaterSource:1Pwssvcconn: 26Pop srvd:ClosedStatus: 12117Fips county:Not ReportedZip served: FLState served:Not ReportedCity served: HANDY WAY #3333/CASSELBERRYPwsname: FL3594152Pwsid: FLState:04Epa region: B3 SW 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Higher FL3594152FRDS PWS FLSA80000019917Site id: 0Pws verify: 0Pws design: Not ReportedParcel id: Not ReportedAgency:Not ReportedStreetside: Not ReportedSoftware:Not ReportedOther id: Not ReportedRes type:POTABLEPort stat: Not ReportedAction:Not ReportedWsrp id: 309226Gps id: 309226Loc id: WINTER SPRINGSCity:32708Zipcode: Not ReportedPostdir:RDSuffix: TUSKAWILLAStreet:Not ReportedPrefix: Not ReportedPredir:190Number : 190 TUSKAWILLA RDAddress:SEMINOLECounty: Not ReportedProperty i:Not ReportedReq numb: Not ReportedInsp chd:Not ReportedInsp lname: Not ReportedInsp fname:SUPERProject id: DGPSLoc method:02-NOV-00Gps date: 14.74Hae: WS1984Datum: 0Lg pws: Not ReportedPhone ext:Not ReportedPhone: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 434 TC05335716.2r Page A-11 FLSA80000019920Site id: 0Pws verify: 0Pws design: Not ReportedParcel id: Not ReportedAgency:Not ReportedStreetside: Not ReportedSoftware:Not ReportedOther id: Not ReportedRes type:POTABLEPort stat: Not ReportedAction:Not ReportedWsrp id: 309232Gps id: 309232Loc id: WINTER SPRINGSCity:32708Zipcode: Not ReportedPostdir:Not ReportedSuffix: SR 434Street:Not ReportedPrefix: EPredir:1175Number : 1175 E SR 434Address:SEMINOLECounty: Not ReportedProperty i:Not ReportedReq numb: Not ReportedInsp chd:Not ReportedInsp lname: Not ReportedInsp fname:SUPERProject id: DGPSLoc method:02-NOV-00Gps date: 18.59Hae: WS1984Datum: 0Lg pws: Not ReportedPhone ext:Not ReportedPhone: Not ReportedLast name:Not ReportedFirst name: CARL ROBERTSName:YesSanit seal: UNABLE TO OBTAIN PERMISSION TO SAMPLEComment : Not ReportedPermit num:2Diameter: 0Length: 0Well depth: 28.6978Latitude: -81.26442Longitude: GalvanizedCasing mat:INACTIVEStatus: 43Well type:AAF0833Fluwid: C4 WNW 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Higher FLSA80000019920FL WELLS Violations information not reported. 00000026Population:TreatedTreatment Class: Not ReportedCity Served: 081 15 50Facility Longitude:28 41 40Facility Latitude: CRESCENT CITY, FL 32112 331 CENTRAL AVENUE MILLER ENTERPRISES, INC. System Owner/Responsible PartyAddressee / Facility: WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708 CNR OF TUSKAWILLA & 434 HANDY WAY # 3333PWS Name: Not ReportedDate Deactivated:Not ReportedDate Initiated: FL3594152PWS ID: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 435 TC05335716.2r Page A-12 DONAHOELast name:ANNETTEFirst name: DONAHOEName:YesSanit seal: UNABLE TO OBTAIN PERMISSIONComment : Not ReportedPermit num:4Diameter: 0Length: 0Well depth: 28.69514Latitude: -81.26462Longitude: BLACK STEELCasing mat:ACTIVEStatus: 43Well type:AAK3868Fluwid: B6 WSW 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Higher FLSA80000072744FL WELLS FLSA80000019916Site id: 0Pws verify: 0Pws design: Not ReportedParcel id: Not ReportedAgency:Not ReportedStreetside: Not ReportedSoftware:Not ReportedOther id: Not ReportedRes type:NON-POTABLEPort stat: Not ReportedAction:Not ReportedWsrp id: 309224Gps id: 309224Loc id: WINTER SPRINGSCity:32708Zipcode: Not ReportedPostdir:AVESuffix: BRANTLEYStreet:Not ReportedPrefix: Not ReportedPredir:42Number : 42 BRANTLEY AVEAddress:SEMINOLECounty: Not ReportedProperty i:Not ReportedReq numb: Not ReportedInsp chd:Not ReportedInsp lname: Not ReportedInsp fname:SUPERProject id: DGPSLoc method:02-NOV-00Gps date: 12.39Hae: WS1984Datum: 0Lg pws: Not ReportedPhone ext:Not ReportedPhone: Not ReportedLast name:Not ReportedFirst name: VERN KINGSBURYName:YesSanit seal: PROPERTY RAZEDComment : Not ReportedPermit num:4Diameter: 0Length: 0Well depth: 28.69935Latitude: -81.26136Longitude: Black SteelCasing mat:ABANDONEDStatus: 43Well type:AAF0829Fluwid: 5 North 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Lower FLSA80000019916FL WELLS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 436 TC05335716.2r Page A-13 Not ReportedParcel id: DOHAgency:YesStreetside: Well_Solo_v2Software:Not ReportedOther id: OWNERRes type:POTABLEPort stat: Not ReportedAction:Not ReportedWsrp id: 788950Gps id: 788950Loc id: WINTER SPRINGSCity:32708Zipcode: Not ReportedPostdir:WAYSuffix: NATURESStreet:Not ReportedPrefix: Not ReportedPredir:1249Number : 1249 NATURES WAYAddress:SEMINOLECounty: Not ReportedProperty i:Not ReportedReq numb: SEMINOLEInsp chd:BITTLEInsp lname: JOYCEInsp fname:SUPERProject id: DGPSLoc method:07-MAR-07Gps date: -8.01Hae: WS1984Datum: 0Lg pws: Not ReportedPhone ext:Not ReportedPhone: Not ReportedLast name:Not ReportedFirst name: Not ReportedName:YesSanit seal: UNABLE TO OBTAIN PERMISSION TO SAMPLEComment : Not ReportedPermit num:2Diameter: 0Length: 0Well depth: 28.69562Latitude: -81.26503Longitude: PVCCasing mat:ACTIVEStatus: 43Well type:AAK9365Fluwid: D7 WSW 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Higher FLSA80000075612FL WELLS FLSA80000072744Site id: 0Pws verify: 0Pws design: Not ReportedParcel id: DOHAgency:NoStreetside: Well_Solo_v2Software:Not ReportedOther id: OWNERRes type:POTABLEPort stat: Not ReportedAction:Not ReportedWsrp id: 773320Gps id: 773320Loc id: WINTER SPRINGSCity:32708Zipcode: Not ReportedPostdir:WAYSuffix: NATURESStreet:Not ReportedPrefix: Not ReportedPredir:1233Number : 1233 NATURES WAYAddress:SEMINOLECounty: Not ReportedProperty i:Not ReportedReq numb: SEMINOLEInsp chd:BITTLEInsp lname: JOYCEInsp fname:SUPERProject id: DGPSLoc method:11-AUG-06Gps date: -.71Hae: Not ReportedDatum: 0Lg pws: Not ReportedPhone ext:Not ReportedPhone: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 437 TC05335716.2r Page A-14 Not ReportedLast name:Not ReportedFirst name: Not ReportedName:YesSanit seal: Not ReportedComment : Not ReportedPermit num:2Diameter: 0Length: 0Well depth: 28.69394Latitude: -81.2638Longitude: PVCCasing mat:ACTIVEStatus: 43Well type:AAK9374Fluwid: B9 SW 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Higher FLSA80000075626FL WELLS FLSA80000075613Site id: 0Pws verify: 0Pws design: Not ReportedParcel id: DOHAgency:YesStreetside: Well_Solo_v2Software:Not ReportedOther id: Not ReportedRes type:POTABLEPort stat: UNFILTEREDAction:320247801Wsrp id: 788950Gps id: 788950Loc id: WINTER SPRINGSCity:32708Zipcode: Not ReportedPostdir:WAYSuffix: NATURESStreet:Not ReportedPrefix: Not ReportedPredir:1249Number : 1249 NATURES WAYAddress:SEMINOLECounty: Not ReportedProperty i:Not ReportedReq numb: SEMINOLEInsp chd:BITTLEInsp lname: JOYCEInsp fname:SUPERProject id: DGPSLoc method:07-MAR-07Gps date: -8.01Hae: WS1984Datum: 0Lg pws: Not ReportedPhone ext:Not ReportedPhone: Not ReportedLast name:Not ReportedFirst name: Not ReportedName:Not ReportedSanit seal: Not ReportedComment : Not ReportedPermit num:0Diameter: 0Length: 0Well depth: 28.69562Latitude: -81.26503Longitude: Not ReportedCasing mat:Not ReportedStatus: 43Well type:320247801Fluwid: D8 WSW 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Higher FLSA80000075613FL WELLS FLSA80000075612Site id: 0Pws verify: 0Pws design: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 438 TC05335716.2r Page A-15 Not ReportedParcel id: DOHAgency:YesStreetside: Well_Solo_v2Software:Not ReportedOther id: OWNERRes type:POTABLEPort stat: Not ReportedAction:Not ReportedWsrp id: 788962Gps id: 788962Loc id: WINTER SPRINGSCity:32708Zipcode: Not ReportedPostdir:WAYSuffix: MILKYStreet:Not ReportedPrefix: Not ReportedPredir:--Number : -- MILKY WAYAddress:SEMINOLECounty: Not ReportedProperty i:Not ReportedReq numb: SEMINOLEInsp chd:BITTLEInsp lname: JOYCEInsp fname:SUPERProject id: GPSLoc method:06-MAR-07Gps date: -15.8Hae: WS1984Datum: 0Lg pws: Not ReportedPhone ext:Not ReportedPhone: Not ReportedLast name:Not ReportedFirst name: Not ReportedName:YesSanit seal: Not ReportedComment : Not ReportedPermit num:2Diameter: 0Length: 0Well depth: 28.69458Latitude: -81.26493Longitude: PVCCasing mat:ACTIVEStatus: 43Well type:AAK9372Fluwid: B10 WSW 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Higher FLSA80000075623FL WELLS FLSA80000075626Site id: 0Pws verify: 0Pws design: Not ReportedParcel id: DOHAgency:NoStreetside: Well_Solo_v2Software:Not ReportedOther id: OWNERRes type:POTABLEPort stat: Not ReportedAction:Not ReportedWsrp id: 788966Gps id: 788966Loc id: WINTER SPRINGSCity:32708Zipcode: Not ReportedPostdir:RDSuffix: TUSKAWILLAStreet:Not ReportedPrefix: Not ReportedPredir:290Number : 290 TUSKAWILLA RDAddress:SEMINOLECounty: Not ReportedProperty i:Not ReportedReq numb: SEMINOLEInsp chd:BITTLEInsp lname: JOYCEInsp fname:SUPERProject id: GPSLoc method:02-MAR-07Gps date: -5.08Hae: Not ReportedDatum: 0Lg pws: Not ReportedPhone ext:Not ReportedPhone: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 439 TC05335716.2r Page A-16 Not ReportedLast name:Not ReportedFirst name: TERRY HILLName:YesSanit seal: property razed for development. As of 7/1/05, on vacant propertyComment : Not ReportedPermit num:2Diameter: 0Length: 0Well depth: 28.6987Latitude: -81.26501Longitude: GalvanizedCasing mat:ABANDONEDStatus: 43Well type:AAF0831Fluwid: C12 NW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSA80000019918FL WELLS FLSA80000075624Site id: 0Pws verify: 0Pws design: Not ReportedParcel id: DOHAgency:YesStreetside: Well_Solo_v2Software:Not ReportedOther id: Not ReportedRes type:POTABLEPort stat: UNFILTEREDAction:320248401Wsrp id: 788962Gps id: 788962Loc id: WINTER SPRINGSCity:32708Zipcode: Not ReportedPostdir:WAYSuffix: MILKYStreet:Not ReportedPrefix: Not ReportedPredir:--Number : -- MILKY WAYAddress:SEMINOLECounty: Not ReportedProperty i:Not ReportedReq numb: SEMINOLEInsp chd:BITTLEInsp lname: JOYCEInsp fname:SUPERProject id: GPSLoc method:06-MAR-07Gps date: -15.8Hae: WS1984Datum: 0Lg pws: Not ReportedPhone ext:Not ReportedPhone: Not ReportedLast name:Not ReportedFirst name: Not ReportedName:Not ReportedSanit seal: Not ReportedComment : Not ReportedPermit num:0Diameter: 0Length: 0Well depth: 28.69458Latitude: -81.26493Longitude: Not ReportedCasing mat:Not ReportedStatus: 43Well type:320248401Fluwid: B11 WSW 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Higher FLSA80000075624FL WELLS FLSA80000075623Site id: 0Pws verify: 0Pws design: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 440 TC05335716.2r Page A-17 Not ReportedParcel id: Not ReportedAgency:Not ReportedStreetside: Not ReportedSoftware:Not ReportedOther id: Not ReportedRes type:NON-POTABLEPort stat: Not ReportedAction:Not ReportedWsrp id: 309230Gps id: 309230Loc id: WINTER SPRINGSCity:32708Zipcode: Not ReportedPostdir:Not ReportedSuffix: SR 434Street:Not ReportedPrefix: EPredir:1161Number : 1161 E SR 434Address:SEMINOLECounty: Not ReportedProperty i:Not ReportedReq numb: Not ReportedInsp chd:Not ReportedInsp lname: Not ReportedInsp fname:SUPERProject id: DGPSLoc method:02-NOV-00Gps date: 18.74Hae: WS1984Datum: 0Lg pws: Not ReportedPhone ext:Not ReportedPhone: Not ReportedLast name:Not ReportedFirst name: MARK RICEName:YesSanit seal: As of 7/1/05, on vacant propertyComment : Not ReportedPermit num:2Diameter: 0Length: 0Well depth: 28.69851Latitude: -81.26537Longitude: PVCCasing mat:ABANDONEDStatus: 43Well type:AAF0832Fluwid: C13 WNW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSA80000019919FL WELLS FLSA80000019918Site id: 0Pws verify: 0Pws design: Not ReportedParcel id: Not ReportedAgency:Not ReportedStreetside: Not ReportedSoftware:Not ReportedOther id: Not ReportedRes type:NON-POTABLEPort stat: Not ReportedAction:Not ReportedWsrp id: 309228Gps id: 309228Loc id: WINTER SPRINGSCity:32708Zipcode: Not ReportedPostdir:Not ReportedSuffix: SR 434Street:Not ReportedPrefix: EPredir:1165Number : 1165 E SR 434Address:SEMINOLECounty: Not ReportedProperty i:Not ReportedReq numb: Not ReportedInsp chd:Not ReportedInsp lname: Not ReportedInsp fname:SUPERProject id: DGPSLoc method:02-NOV-00Gps date: 18.36Hae: WS1984Datum: 0Lg pws: Not ReportedPhone ext:Not ReportedPhone: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 441 TC05335716.2r Page A-18 Not ReportedLast name:Not ReportedFirst name: Not ReportedName:Not ReportedSanit seal: Not ReportedComment : Not ReportedPermit num:0Diameter: 0Length: 0Well depth: 28.69355Latitude: -81.26465Longitude: Not ReportedCasing mat:Not ReportedStatus: 43Well type:320248101Fluwid: E15 SW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSA80000075618FL WELLS FLSA80000019973Site id: 0Pws verify: 0Pws design: Not ReportedParcel id: Not ReportedAgency:Not ReportedStreetside: Not ReportedSoftware:Not ReportedOther id: Not ReportedRes type:NON-POTABLEPort stat: Not ReportedAction:Not ReportedWsrp id: 309338Gps id: 309338Loc id: WINTER SPRINGSCity:32708Zipcode: Not ReportedPostdir:RDSuffix: TUSKAWILLAStreet:Not ReportedPrefix: Not ReportedPredir:201Number : 201 TUSKAWILLA RDAddress:SEMINOLECounty: Not ReportedProperty i:Not ReportedReq numb: Not ReportedInsp chd:Not ReportedInsp lname: Not ReportedInsp fname:SUPERProject id: DGPSLoc method:21-FEB-01Gps date: 26.78Hae: WS1984Datum: 0Lg pws: Not ReportedPhone ext:Not ReportedPhone: Not ReportedLast name:Not ReportedFirst name: HI- FLAVOR MEATS [FORMERLY Name:YesSanit seal: Building bulldozed; PROPERTY VACANT -UP FOR LEASEComment : Not ReportedPermit num:2Diameter: 0Length: 0Well depth: 28.69279Latitude: -81.2631Longitude: GalvanizedCasing mat:ABANDONEDStatus: 41Well type:AAF0886Fluwid: 14 SSW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSA80000019973FL WELLS FLSA80000019919Site id: 0Pws verify: 0Pws design: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 442 TC05335716.2r Page A-19 Not ReportedParcel id: DOHAgency:NoStreetside: Well_Solo_v2Software:Not ReportedOther id: OWNERRes type:POTABLEPort stat: Not ReportedAction:Not ReportedWsrp id: 788956Gps id: 788956Loc id: WINTER SPRINGSCity:32708Zipcode: Not ReportedPostdir:RDSuffix: TUSKAWILLAStreet:Not ReportedPrefix: Not ReportedPredir:300Number : 300 TUSKAWILLA RDAddress:SEMINOLECounty: Not ReportedProperty i:Not ReportedReq numb: SEMINOLEInsp chd:BITTLEInsp lname: JOYCEInsp fname:SUPERProject id: DGPSLoc method:13-MAR-07Gps date: 15.02Hae: WS1984Datum: 0Lg pws: Not ReportedPhone ext:Not ReportedPhone: LOFROOSLast name:Not ReportedFirst name: LOFROOSName:YesSanit seal: Not ReportedComment : Not ReportedPermit num:2Diameter: 0Length: 0Well depth: 28.69355Latitude: -81.26465Longitude: GALVANIZEDCasing mat:ACTIVEStatus: 43Well type:AAK9369Fluwid: E16 SW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSA80000075619FL WELLS FLSA80000075618Site id: 0Pws verify: 0Pws design: Not ReportedParcel id: DOHAgency:NoStreetside: Well_Solo_v2Software:Not ReportedOther id: Not ReportedRes type:POTABLEPort stat: UNFILTEREDAction:320248101Wsrp id: 788956Gps id: 788956Loc id: WINTER SPRINGSCity:32708Zipcode: Not ReportedPostdir:RDSuffix: TUSKAWILLAStreet:Not ReportedPrefix: Not ReportedPredir:300Number : 300 TUSKAWILLA RDAddress:SEMINOLECounty: Not ReportedProperty i:Not ReportedReq numb: SEMINOLEInsp chd:BITTLEInsp lname: JOYCEInsp fname:SUPERProject id: DGPSLoc method:13-MAR-07Gps date: 15.02Hae: WS1984Datum: 0Lg pws: Not ReportedPhone ext:Not ReportedPhone: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 443 TC05335716.2r Page A-20 Not ReportedLast name:Not ReportedFirst name: Not ReportedName:Not ReportedSanit seal: Not ReportedComment : Not ReportedPermit num:0Diameter: 0Length: 0Well depth: 28.6957Latitude: -81.26663Longitude: Not ReportedCasing mat:Not ReportedStatus: 43Well type:320247901Fluwid: F18 West 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower FLSA80000075614FL WELLS FLSA80000075622Site id: 0Pws verify: 0Pws design: Not ReportedParcel id: DOHAgency:YesStreetside: Well_Solo_v2Software:Not ReportedOther id: OWNERRes type:POTABLEPort stat: Not ReportedAction:Not ReportedWsrp id: 788960Gps id: 788960Loc id: WINTER SPRINGSCity:32708Zipcode: Not ReportedPostdir:WAYSuffix: MILKYStreet:Not ReportedPrefix: Not ReportedPredir:1270Number : 1270 MILKY WAYAddress:SEMINOLECounty: Not ReportedProperty i:Not ReportedReq numb: SEMINOLEInsp chd:BITTLEInsp lname: JOYCEInsp fname:SUPERProject id: GPSLoc method:06-MAR-07Gps date: -2.13Hae: Not ReportedDatum: 0Lg pws: Not ReportedPhone ext:Not ReportedPhone: Not ReportedLast name:Not ReportedFirst name: Not ReportedName:YesSanit seal: Not ReportedComment : Not ReportedPermit num:2Diameter: 0Length: 0Well depth: 28.69466Latitude: -81.2658Longitude: PVCCasing mat:ACTIVEStatus: 43Well type:AAK9371Fluwid: D17 WSW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSA80000075622FL WELLS FLSA80000075619Site id: 0Pws verify: 0Pws design: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 444 TC05335716.2r Page A-21 Not ReportedParcel id: DOHAgency:YesStreetside: Well_Solo_v2Software:Not ReportedOther id: OWNERRes type:POTABLEPort stat: Not ReportedAction:Not ReportedWsrp id: 788952Gps id: 788952Loc id: WINTER SPRINGSCity:32708Zipcode: Not ReportedPostdir:WAYSuffix: NATURESStreet:Not ReportedPrefix: Not ReportedPredir:1281Number : 1281 NATURES WAYAddress:SEMINOLECounty: Not ReportedProperty i:Not ReportedReq numb: SEMINOLEInsp chd:BITTLEInsp lname: JOYCEInsp fname:SUPERProject id: GPSLoc method:06-MAR-07Gps date: -12.72Hae: WS1984Datum: 0Lg pws: Not ReportedPhone ext:Not ReportedPhone: Not ReportedLast name:Not ReportedFirst name: Not ReportedName:YesSanit seal: UNABLE TO OBTAIN PERMISSION TO SAMPLEComment : Not ReportedPermit num:2Diameter: 0Length: 0Well depth: 28.6957Latitude: -81.26663Longitude: PVCCasing mat:ACTIVEStatus: 43Well type:AAK9367Fluwid: F19 West 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower FLSA80000075615FL WELLS FLSA80000075614Site id: 0Pws verify: 0Pws design: Not ReportedParcel id: DOHAgency:YesStreetside: Well_Solo_v2Software:Not ReportedOther id: Not ReportedRes type:POTABLEPort stat: UNFILTEREDAction:320247901Wsrp id: 788952Gps id: 788952Loc id: WINTER SPRINGSCity:32708Zipcode: Not ReportedPostdir:WAYSuffix: NATURESStreet:Not ReportedPrefix: Not ReportedPredir:1281Number : 1281 NATURES WAYAddress:SEMINOLECounty: Not ReportedProperty i:Not ReportedReq numb: SEMINOLEInsp chd:BITTLEInsp lname: JOYCEInsp fname:SUPERProject id: GPSLoc method:06-MAR-07Gps date: -12.72Hae: WS1984Datum: 0Lg pws: Not ReportedPhone ext:Not ReportedPhone: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 445 TC05335716.2r Page A-22 Not ReportedLast name:Not ReportedFirst name: Not ReportedName:Not ReportedSanit seal: Not ReportedComment : Not ReportedPermit num:0Diameter: 0Length: 0Well depth: 28.69572Latitude: -81.26716Longitude: Not ReportedCasing mat:Not ReportedStatus: 43Well type:320248001Fluwid: F21 West 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower FLSA80000075617FL WELLS FLSA80000004735Site id: 0Pws verify: 0Pws design: Not ReportedParcel id: Not ReportedAgency:Not ReportedStreetside: Not ReportedSoftware:Not ReportedOther id: Not ReportedRes type:POTABLEPort stat: Not ReportedAction:Not ReportedWsrp id: 159714Gps id: 159714Loc id: WINTER SPRINGSCity:32708Zipcode: Not ReportedPostdir:BLVDSuffix: DORANStreet:Not ReportedPrefix: Not ReportedPredir:141Number : 141 DORAN BLVDAddress:SEMINOLECounty: Not ReportedProperty i:Not ReportedReq numb: Not ReportedInsp chd:Not ReportedInsp lname: Not ReportedInsp fname:SUPERProject id: DGPSLoc method:09-AUG-04Gps date: 20.9Hae: WS1984Datum: 0Lg pws: Not ReportedPhone ext:Not ReportedPhone: Not ReportedLast name:Not ReportedFirst name: JUANITA BLUMBERGName:YesSanit seal: Not ReportedComment : Not ReportedPermit num:4Diameter: 0Length: 0Well depth: 28.70107Latitude: -81.2632Longitude: Black SteelCasing mat:ACTIVEStatus: 43Well type:AAI6781Fluwid: 20 NNW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSA80000004735FL WELLS FLSA80000075615Site id: 0Pws verify: 0Pws design: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 446 TC05335716.2r Page A-23 Not ReportedParcel id: DOHAgency:YesStreetside: Well_Solo_v2Software:Not ReportedOther id: OWNERRes type:POTABLEPort stat: Not ReportedAction:Not ReportedWsrp id: 788954Gps id: 788954Loc id: WINTER SPRINGSCity:32708Zipcode: Not ReportedPostdir:WAYSuffix: NATURESStreet:Not ReportedPrefix: Not ReportedPredir:1297Number : 1297 NATURES WAYAddress:SEMINOLECounty: Not ReportedProperty i:Not ReportedReq numb: SEMINOLEInsp chd:BITTLEInsp lname: JOYCEInsp fname:SUPERProject id: GPSLoc method:06-MAR-07Gps date: -15.11Hae: WS1984Datum: 0Lg pws: Not ReportedPhone ext:Not ReportedPhone: Not ReportedLast name:Not ReportedFirst name: Not ReportedName:YesSanit seal: Not ReportedComment : Not ReportedPermit num:2Diameter: 0Length: 0Well depth: 28.69572Latitude: -81.26716Longitude: PVCCasing mat:ACTIVEStatus: 43Well type:AAK9368Fluwid: F22 West 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower FLSA80000075616FL WELLS FLSA80000075617Site id: 0Pws verify: 0Pws design: Not ReportedParcel id: DOHAgency:YesStreetside: Well_Solo_v2Software:Not ReportedOther id: Not ReportedRes type:POTABLEPort stat: UNFILTEREDAction:320248001Wsrp id: 788954Gps id: 788954Loc id: WINTER SPRINGSCity:32708Zipcode: Not ReportedPostdir:WAYSuffix: NATURESStreet:Not ReportedPrefix: Not ReportedPredir:1297Number : 1297 NATURES WAYAddress:SEMINOLECounty: Not ReportedProperty i:Not ReportedReq numb: SEMINOLEInsp chd:BITTLEInsp lname: JOYCEInsp fname:SUPERProject id: GPSLoc method:06-MAR-07Gps date: -15.11Hae: WS1984Datum: 0Lg pws: Not ReportedPhone ext:Not ReportedPhone: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 447 TC05335716.2r Page A-24 Not ReportedLast name:Not ReportedFirst name: Not ReportedName:YesSanit seal: Not ReportedComment : Not ReportedPermit num:2Diameter: 0Length: 0Well depth: 28.6945Latitude: -81.26715Longitude: PVCCasing mat:ACTIVEStatus: 43Well type:AAK9370Fluwid: G24 WSW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower FLSA80000075620FL WELLS FLSA80000077031Site id: 0Pws verify: 0Pws design: Not ReportedParcel id: DOHAgency:NoStreetside: Well_Solo_v2Software:Not ReportedOther id: OWNERRes type:POTABLEPort stat: Not ReportedAction:Not ReportedWsrp id: 796364Gps id: 796364Loc id: WINTER SPRINGSCity:32708Zipcode: Not ReportedPostdir:WAYSuffix: NATURESStreet:Not ReportedPrefix: Not ReportedPredir:1297Number : 1297 NATURES WAYAddress:SEMINOLECounty: Not ReportedProperty i:Not ReportedReq numb: SEMINOLEInsp chd:BITTLEInsp lname: JOYCEInsp fname:SUPERProject id: GPSLoc method:11-JUN-07Gps date: -16.11Hae: Not ReportedDatum: 0Lg pws: Not ReportedPhone ext:Not ReportedPhone: RODENBURGLast name:Not ReportedFirst name: RODENBURGName:YesSanit seal: Not ReportedComment : Not ReportedPermit num:4Diameter: 0Length: 0Well depth: 28.6953Latitude: -81.26711Longitude: BLACK STEELCasing mat:ACTIVEStatus: 43Well type:AAK9277Fluwid: F23 WSW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower FLSA80000077031FL WELLS FLSA80000075616Site id: 0Pws verify: 0Pws design: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 448 TC05335716.2r Page A-25 Not ReportedParcel id: DOHAgency:YesStreetside: Well_Solo_v2Software:Not ReportedOther id: Not ReportedRes type:POTABLEPort stat: UNFILTEREDAction:320248201Wsrp id: 788958Gps id: 788958Loc id: WINTER SPRINGSCity:32708Zipcode: Not ReportedPostdir:WAYSuffix: MILKYStreet:Not ReportedPrefix: Not ReportedPredir:1296Number : 1296 MILKY WAYAddress:SEMINOLECounty: Not ReportedProperty i:Not ReportedReq numb: SEMINOLEInsp chd:BITTLEInsp lname: JOYCEInsp fname:SUPERProject id: GPSLoc method:06-MAR-07Gps date: -13.14Hae: WS1984Datum: 0Lg pws: Not ReportedPhone ext:Not ReportedPhone: Not ReportedLast name:Not ReportedFirst name: Not ReportedName:Not ReportedSanit seal: Not ReportedComment : Not ReportedPermit num:0Diameter: 0Length: 0Well depth: 28.6945Latitude: -81.26715Longitude: Not ReportedCasing mat:Not ReportedStatus: 43Well type:320248201Fluwid: G25 WSW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower FLSA80000075621FL WELLS FLSA80000075620Site id: 0Pws verify: 0Pws design: Not ReportedParcel id: DOHAgency:YesStreetside: Well_Solo_v2Software:Not ReportedOther id: OWNERRes type:POTABLEPort stat: Not ReportedAction:Not ReportedWsrp id: 788958Gps id: 788958Loc id: WINTER SPRINGSCity:32708Zipcode: Not ReportedPostdir:WAYSuffix: MILKYStreet:Not ReportedPrefix: Not ReportedPredir:1296Number : 1296 MILKY WAYAddress:SEMINOLECounty: Not ReportedProperty i:Not ReportedReq numb: SEMINOLEInsp chd:BITTLEInsp lname: JOYCEInsp fname:SUPERProject id: GPSLoc method:06-MAR-07Gps date: -13.14Hae: WS1984Datum: 0Lg pws: Not ReportedPhone ext:Not ReportedPhone: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 449 TC05335716.2r Page A-26 Not ReportedPrmt decis:06-SEP-00Recv dt: L. D. Plante Inc.Prmt proj : CUP General (40C-20)Rule type :40C-20Rule type: ClosedPrmt stage:RenewalSeq type: L. D. PLANTE INC.Site nm: 25099Site id : NMonitoring:Production WellStn tp: 1Stn alias :15453Stn id: 3Seq no:8300Offcl prmt: 67835Cur prmt i:9933Fid: H27 South 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower FLSJ80000009934FL WELLS FLSJ80000003410Site id: 811537Long no:284125Lat no: -81.26033982Dec long: 28.69027231Dec lat: Commercial/Industrial/InstitutionalProj use t:CLOSPrmt app p: https://permitting.sjrwmd.com/epermitting/jsp/DocumentSearch.do?permitNum=8300&seqNo=2&command=OnlySearchLink: InactiveDisc prmt : YProd loade:Not ReportedEdit date: ORACLEPRODEditor:77008Objectid: In ComplianceCmplnc stt:DigitizeStnhdr det: 3Determinat:NGps: 25Max cap qt: ActiveStn stts: FAS - Upper Floridan AquiferSource:31ERng id: 21STwnshp id:38Sect id: 160Well cur d:102Well csng1: 4Well csng :SeminoleCounty: 82Proj acres: ClosedPrmt stts:ApprovalPrmt recom: L D PLANTE INC;L D PLANTE INCOwner: CHARLES SCHOLPPApplicant: 07-SEP-00Prmt expir: 07-SEP-93Prmt decis:14-APR-93Recv dt: L. D. Plante Inc.Prmt proj : CUP Individual (40C-2)Rule type :40C-2Rule type: ClosedPrmt stage:ModificationSeq type: L. D. PLANTE INC.Site nm: 4038Site id : NMonitoring:Production WellStn tp: 1Stn alias :15453Stn id: 2Seq no:8300Offcl prmt: 3741Cur prmt i:3409Fid: H26 South 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower FLSJ80000003410FL WELLS FLSA80000075621Site id: 0Pws verify: 0Pws design: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 450 TC05335716.2r Page A-27 Not ReportedParcel id: DOHAgency:NoStreetside: Well_Solo_v2Software:Not ReportedOther id: OWNERRes type:POTABLEPort stat: UNFILTEREDAction:590088401Wsrp id: 771068Gps id: 771068Loc id: WINTER SPRINGSCity:32708Zipcode: Not ReportedPostdir:AVESuffix: RAILROADStreet:Not ReportedPrefix: Not ReportedPredir:2950Number : 2950 RAILROAD AVEAddress:SEMINOLECounty: Not ReportedProperty i:DC23186Req numb: SEMINOLEInsp chd:BITTLEInsp lname: JOYCEInsp fname:SUPERProject id: DGPSLoc method:25-MAY-06Gps date: -2.96Hae: Not ReportedDatum: 0Lg pws: Not ReportedPhone ext:Not ReportedPhone: PLANTELast name:LAWRENCEFirst name: PLANTEName:YesSanit seal: Not ReportedComment : Not ReportedPermit num:4Diameter: 0Length: 0Well depth: 28.68985Latitude: -81.26019Longitude: BLACK STEELCasing mat:ACTIVEStatus: 43Well type:AAK3884Fluwid: H28 South 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSA80000072221FL WELLS FLSJ80000009934Site id: 811537Long no:284125Lat no: -81.26033982Dec long: 28.69027231Dec lat: Commercial/Industrial/InstitutionalProj use t:CLOSPrmt app p: https://permitting.sjrwmd.com/epermitting/jsp/DocumentSearch.do?permitNum=8300&seqNo=3&command=OnlySearchLink: Never ActiveDisc prmt : NProd loade:Not ReportedEdit date: Not ReportedEditor:111967Objectid: In ComplianceCmplnc stt:DigitizeStnhdr det: 3Determinat:NGps: 25Max cap qt: ActiveStn stts: FAS - Upper Floridan AquiferSource:31ERng id: 21STwnshp id:38Sect id: 160Well cur d:102Well csng1: 4Well csng :SeminoleCounty: 136Proj acres: Never IssuedPrmt stts:No Permit RequiredPrmt recom: L D PLANTE INC;L D PLANTE INCOwner: CHARLES SCHOLPPApplicant: Not ReportedPrmt expir: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 451 TC05335716.2r Page A-28 10-OCT-96Prmt decis:10-OCT-96Recv dt: Seminole Pines Mobile Home ParkPrmt proj : CUP Individual (40C-2)Rule type :40C-2Rule type: ClosedPrmt stage:Transfer of OwnershipSeq type: Seminole Pines Mobile Home ParkSite nm: 11986Site id : NMonitoring:Production WellStn tp: AStn alias :15656Stn id: 3Seq no:8369Offcl prmt: 12071Cur prmt i:37005Fid: I30 NW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSJ80000037006FL WELLS FLSA80000070479Site id: 0Pws verify: 0Pws design: Not ReportedParcel id: DOHAgency:NoStreetside: Well_Solo_v2Software:Not ReportedOther id: OWNERRes type:POTABLEPort stat: Not ReportedAction:Not ReportedWsrp id: 763568Gps id: 763568Loc id: WINTER SPRINGSCity:32708Zipcode: Not ReportedPostdir:RDSuffix: TUSKAWILLAStreet:Not ReportedPrefix: Not ReportedPredir:395Number : 395 TUSKAWILLA RDAddress:SEMINOLECounty: Not ReportedProperty i:Not ReportedReq numb: SEMINOLEInsp chd:BITTLEInsp lname: JOYCEInsp fname:SUPERProject id: DGPSLoc method:29-APR-09Gps date: 12.56Hae: Not ReportedDatum: 0Lg pws: Not ReportedPhone ext:Not ReportedPhone: Not ReportedLast name:Not ReportedFirst name: LORD OF LIFE CHURCHName:YesSanit seal: Talked to church-well is for irrigationComment : Not ReportedPermit num:2Diameter: 0Length: 0Well depth: 28.68991Latitude: -81.26388Longitude: PVCCasing mat:ACTIVEStatus: 43Well type:AAJ1390Fluwid: 29 SSW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSA80000070479FL WELLS FLSA80000072221Site id: 0Pws verify: 0Pws design: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 452 TC05335716.2r Page A-29 -81.26752621Dec long: 28.70135887Dec lat: Public SupplyProj use t:CLOSPrmt app p: https://permitting.sjrwmd.com/epermitting/jsp/DocumentSearch.do?permitNum=8369&seqNo=4&command=OnlySearchLink: InactiveDisc prmt : NProd loade:Not ReportedEdit date: Not ReportedEditor:62307Objectid: Out Of ComplianceCmplnc stt:DigitizeStnhdr det: 3Determinat:YGps: 100Max cap qt: InactiveStn stts: FAS - Upper Floridan AquiferSource:30ERng id: 20STwnshp id:38Sect id: 150Well cur d:0Well csng1: 4Well csng :SeminoleCounty: 50Proj acres: ClosedPrmt stts:ApprovalPrmt recom: Seminole Pines Assoc LtdOwner: Martin Newby Management CorpApplicant: 16-NOV-20Prmt expir: 16-NOV-00Prmt decis:13-OCT-99Recv dt: Tuscawilla TrailsPrmt proj : CUP General (40C-20)Rule type :40C-20Rule type: ClosedPrmt stage:RenewalSeq type: Tuscawilla TrailsSite nm: 20957Site id : NMonitoring:Production WellStn tp: AStn alias :15656Stn id: 4Seq no:8369Offcl prmt: 62700Cur prmt i:12432Fid: I31 NW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSJ80000012433FL WELLS FLSJ80000037006Site id: 811603Long no:284205Lat no: -81.26752621Dec long: 28.70135887Dec lat: Public SupplyProj use t:CLOSPrmt app p: https://permitting.sjrwmd.com/epermitting/jsp/DocumentSearch.do?permitNum=8369&seqNo=3&command=OnlySearchLink: InactiveDisc prmt : YProd loade:Not ReportedEdit date: ORACLEPRODEditor:112233Objectid: Out Of ComplianceCmplnc stt:DigitizeStnhdr det: 3Determinat:NGps: 100Max cap qt: InactiveStn stts: FAS - Upper Floridan AquiferSource:30ERng id: 20STwnshp id:38Sect id: 150Well cur d:0Well csng1: 4Well csng :SeminoleCounty: 50Proj acres: ClosedPrmt stts:ApprovalPrmt recom: Seminole Pines Assoc LtdOwner: Martin Newby Management CorpApplicant: 13-OCT-99Prmt expir: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 453 TC05335716.2r Page A-30 08-APR-85Prmt decis:17-DEC-84Recv dt: Indian Creek IncPrmt proj : CUP Individual (40C-2)Rule type :40C-2Rule type: ClosedPrmt stage:New/CreationSeq type: Incian Creek IncSite nm: 8629Site id : NMonitoring:Production WellStn tp: AStn alias :15656Stn id: 1Seq no:8369Offcl prmt: 8369Cur prmt i:38970Fid: I33 NW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSJ80000038971FL WELLS FLSJ80000062510Site id: 811603Long no:284205Lat no: -81.26752621Dec long: 28.70135887Dec lat: Public SupplyProj use t:CLOSPrmt app p: https://permitting.sjrwmd.com/epermitting/jsp/DocumentSearch.do?permitNum=8369&seqNo=2&command=OnlySearchLink: InactiveDisc prmt : YProd loade:Not ReportedEdit date: ORACLEPRODEditor:86612Objectid: In ComplianceCmplnc stt:DigitizeStnhdr det: 3Determinat:NGps: 100Max cap qt: InactiveStn stts: FAS - Upper Floridan AquiferSource:30ERng id: 20STwnshp id:38Sect id: 150Well cur d:0Well csng1: 4Well csng :SeminoleCounty: 50Proj acres: ClosedPrmt stts:ApprovalPrmt recom: Seminole Pines Assoc LtdOwner: Martin Newby Management CorpApplicant: 13-OCT-99Prmt expir: 13-OCT-92Prmt decis:06-APR-92Recv dt: Seminole Pines Mobile Home ParkPrmt proj : CUP Individual (40C-2)Rule type :40C-2Rule type: ClosedPrmt stage:ModificationSeq type: Seminole Pines Mobile Home ParkSite nm: 8628Site id : NMonitoring:Production WellStn tp: AStn alias :15656Stn id: 2Seq no:8369Offcl prmt: 8368Cur prmt i:62509Fid: I32 NW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSJ80000062510FL WELLS FLSJ80000012433Site id: 811603Long no:284205Lat no: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 454 TC05335716.2r Page A-31 -81.25950646Dec long: 28.68943897Dec lat: Commercial/Industrial/InstitutionalProj use t:CLOSPrmt app p: https://permitting.sjrwmd.com/epermitting/jsp/DocumentSearch.do?permitNum=8300&seqNo=3&command=OnlySearchLink: Never ActiveDisc prmt : NProd loade:Not ReportedEdit date: Not ReportedEditor:72439Objectid: In ComplianceCmplnc stt:DigitizeStnhdr det: 3Determinat:NGps: 1200Max cap qt: InactiveStn stts: FAS - Upper Floridan AquiferSource:31ERng id: 21STwnshp id:38Sect id: 200Well cur d:65Well csng1: 8Well csng :SeminoleCounty: 136Proj acres: Never IssuedPrmt stts:No Permit RequiredPrmt recom: L D PLANTE INC;L D PLANTE INCOwner: CHARLES SCHOLPPApplicant: Not ReportedPrmt expir: Not ReportedPrmt decis:06-SEP-00Recv dt: L. D. Plante Inc.Prmt proj : CUP General (40C-20)Rule type :40C-20Rule type: ClosedPrmt stage:RenewalSeq type: L. D. PLANTE INC.Site nm: 25099Site id : NMonitoring:Production WellStn tp: 2Stn alias :15454Stn id: 3Seq no:8300Offcl prmt: 67835Cur prmt i:46143Fid: H34 SSE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower FLSJ80000046144FL WELLS FLSJ80000038971Site id: 811603Long no:284205Lat no: -81.26752621Dec long: 28.70135887Dec lat: Public SupplyProj use t:CLOSPrmt app p: https://permitting.sjrwmd.com/epermitting/jsp/DocumentSearch.do?permitNum=8369&seqNo=1&command=OnlySearchLink: InactiveDisc prmt : YProd loade:Not ReportedEdit date: ORACLEPRODEditor:116535Objectid: In ComplianceCmplnc stt:DigitizeStnhdr det: 3Determinat:NGps: 100Max cap qt: InactiveStn stts: FAS - Upper Floridan AquiferSource:30ERng id: 20STwnshp id:38Sect id: 150Well cur d:0Well csng1: 4Well csng :SeminoleCounty: 1280Proj acres: ClosedPrmt stts:ApprovalPrmt recom: Seminole Pines Assoc LtdOwner: Martin Newby Management CorpApplicant: 08-APR-92Prmt expir: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 455 TC05335716.2r Page A-32 Not ReportedLast name:Not ReportedFirst name: TUSKAWILLA TRAILSName:YesSanit seal: WELL NOW OUT OF SERVICE RETAGGGED AS AAC3132; Connected to Winter SpringsComment : 3694026Permit num:10Diameter: 322Length: 460Well depth: 28.70157Latitude: -81.2675Longitude: Black SteelCasing mat:RETAGGEDStatus: 50Well type:AAI6780Fluwid: I36 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSA80000004734FL WELLS FLSJ80000050884Site id: 811534Long no:284122Lat no: -81.25950646Dec long: 28.68943897Dec lat: Commercial/Industrial/InstitutionalProj use t:CLOSPrmt app p: https://permitting.sjrwmd.com/epermitting/jsp/DocumentSearch.do?permitNum=8300&seqNo=2&command=OnlySearchLink: InactiveDisc prmt : YProd loade:Not ReportedEdit date: ORACLEPRODEditor:103430Objectid: In ComplianceCmplnc stt:DigitizeStnhdr det: 3Determinat:NGps: 1200Max cap qt: InactiveStn stts: FAS - Upper Floridan AquiferSource:31ERng id: 21STwnshp id:38Sect id: 200Well cur d:65Well csng1: 8Well csng :SeminoleCounty: 82Proj acres: ClosedPrmt stts:ApprovalPrmt recom: L D PLANTE INC;L D PLANTE INCOwner: CHARLES SCHOLPPApplicant: 07-SEP-00Prmt expir: 07-SEP-93Prmt decis:14-APR-93Recv dt: L. D. Plante Inc.Prmt proj : CUP Individual (40C-2)Rule type :40C-2Rule type: ClosedPrmt stage:ModificationSeq type: L. D. PLANTE INC.Site nm: 4038Site id : NMonitoring:Production WellStn tp: 2Stn alias :15454Stn id: 2Seq no:8300Offcl prmt: 3741Cur prmt i:50883Fid: H35 SSE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower FLSJ80000050884FL WELLS FLSJ80000046144Site id: 811534Long no:284122Lat no: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 456 TC05335716.2r Page A-33 -81.25895093Dec long: 28.68943904Dec lat: Commercial/Industrial/InstitutionalProj use t:CLOSPrmt app p: https://permitting.sjrwmd.com/epermitting/jsp/DocumentSearch.do?permitNum=8300&seqNo=3&command=OnlySearchLink: Never ActiveDisc prmt : NProd loade:24-NOV-09Edit date: SandraEditor:68870Objectid: In ComplianceCmplnc stt:DigitizeStnhdr det: 3Determinat:NGps: 0Max cap qt: InactiveStn stts: FAS - Upper Floridan AquiferSource:31ERng id: 21STwnshp id:38Sect id: 0Well cur d:0Well csng1: 4Well csng :SeminoleCounty: 136Proj acres: Never IssuedPrmt stts:No Permit RequiredPrmt recom: L D PLANTE INC;L D PLANTE INCOwner: CHARLES SCHOLPPApplicant: Not ReportedPrmt expir: Not ReportedPrmt decis:06-SEP-00Recv dt: L. D. Plante Inc.Prmt proj : CUP General (40C-20)Rule type :40C-20Rule type: ClosedPrmt stage:RenewalSeq type: L. D. PLANTE INC.Site nm: 25099Site id : NMonitoring:Production WellStn tp: CStn alias :15455Stn id: 3Seq no:8300Offcl prmt: 67835Cur prmt i:42248Fid: J37 SSE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower FLSJ80000042249FL WELLS FLSA80000004734Site id: 0Pws verify: 0Pws design: Not ReportedParcel id: Not ReportedAgency:Not ReportedStreetside: Not ReportedSoftware:Not ReportedOther id: Not ReportedRes type:NON-POTABLEPort stat: Not ReportedAction:Not ReportedWsrp id: 159712Gps id: 159712Loc id: WINTER SPRINGSCity:32708Zipcode: Not ReportedPostdir:Not ReportedSuffix: CHEYENNE TRAILSStreet:Not ReportedPrefix: Not ReportedPredir:1070Number : 1070 CHEYENNE TRAILSAddress:SEMINOLECounty: Not ReportedProperty i:Not ReportedReq numb: Not ReportedInsp chd:Not ReportedInsp lname: Not ReportedInsp fname:SUPERProject id: DGPSLoc method:30-JUL-04Gps date: 20.46Hae: WS1984Datum: 0Lg pws: Not ReportedPhone ext:Not ReportedPhone: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 457 TC05335716.2r Page A-34 Not ReportedLast name:Not ReportedFirst name: TUSKAWILLA TRAILSName:Not ReportedSanit seal: DATUM 84 AS OF 8-13-04 DUE TO HURRICANE CHARLEY, THIS WELL IS NO LONGER IN USE. MOBILE HOME PARK AComment : 3594026Permit num:Not ReportedDiameter: 0Length: 0Well depth: 28.70166Latitude: -81.26769Longitude: Not ReportedCasing mat:INACTIVEStatus: 50Well type:AAC3132Fluwid: I39 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower FLSA80000000496FL WELLS FLSJ80000042490Site id: 811532Long no:284122Lat no: -81.25895093Dec long: 28.68943904Dec lat: Commercial/Industrial/InstitutionalProj use t:CLOSPrmt app p: https://permitting.sjrwmd.com/epermitting/jsp/DocumentSearch.do?permitNum=8300&seqNo=2&command=OnlySearchLink: InactiveDisc prmt : YProd loade:Not ReportedEdit date: ORACLEPRODEditor:86828Objectid: In ComplianceCmplnc stt:DigitizeStnhdr det: 3Determinat:NGps: 0Max cap qt: InactiveStn stts: FAS - Upper Floridan AquiferSource:31ERng id: 21STwnshp id:38Sect id: 0Well cur d:0Well csng1: 4Well csng :SeminoleCounty: 82Proj acres: ClosedPrmt stts:ApprovalPrmt recom: L D PLANTE INC;L D PLANTE INCOwner: CHARLES SCHOLPPApplicant: 07-SEP-00Prmt expir: 07-SEP-93Prmt decis:14-APR-93Recv dt: L. D. Plante Inc.Prmt proj : CUP Individual (40C-2)Rule type :40C-2Rule type: ClosedPrmt stage:ModificationSeq type: L. D. PLANTE INC.Site nm: 4038Site id : NMonitoring:Production WellStn tp: CStn alias :15455Stn id: 2Seq no:8300Offcl prmt: 3741Cur prmt i:42489Fid: J38 SSE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower FLSJ80000042490FL WELLS FLSJ80000042249Site id: 811532Long no:284122Lat no: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 458 TC05335716.2r Page A-35 -81.26744324Dec long: 28.70189361Dec lat: Public SupplyProj use t:CLOSPrmt app p: https://permitting.sjrwmd.com/epermitting/jsp/DocumentSearch.do?permitNum=8369&seqNo=2&command=OnlySearchLink: InactiveDisc prmt : YProd loade:Not ReportedEdit date: ORACLEPRODEditor:107179Objectid: In ComplianceCmplnc stt:DigitizeStnhdr det: 3Determinat:NGps: 750Max cap qt: AbandonedStn stts: FAS - Upper Floridan AquiferSource:30ERng id: 20STwnshp id:38Sect id: 460Well cur d:322Well csng1: 10Well csng :SeminoleCounty: 50Proj acres: ClosedPrmt stts:ApprovalPrmt recom: Seminole Pines Assoc LtdOwner: Martin Newby Management CorpApplicant: 13-OCT-99Prmt expir: 13-OCT-92Prmt decis:06-APR-92Recv dt: Seminole Pines Mobile Home ParkPrmt proj : CUP Individual (40C-2)Rule type :40C-2Rule type: ClosedPrmt stage:ModificationSeq type: Seminole Pines Mobile Home ParkSite nm: 8628Site id : NMonitoring:Production WellStn tp: BStn alias :15657Stn id: 2Seq no:8369Offcl prmt: 8368Cur prmt i:9196Fid: I40 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSJ80000009197FL WELLS FLSA80000000496Site id: 0Pws verify: 0Pws design: Not ReportedParcel id: Not ReportedAgency:Not ReportedStreetside: Not ReportedSoftware:Not ReportedOther id: Not ReportedRes type:NON-POTABLEPort stat: Not ReportedAction:Not ReportedWsrp id: 107818Gps id: 107818Loc id: WINTER SPRINGSCity:32708Zipcode: Not ReportedPostdir:Not ReportedSuffix: CHEYENNE TRAILStreet:Not ReportedPrefix: Not ReportedPredir:1070Number : 1070 CHEYENNE TRAILAddress:SEMINOLECounty: Not ReportedProperty i:Not ReportedReq numb: Not ReportedInsp chd:Not ReportedInsp lname: Not ReportedInsp fname:DEPProject id: DGPSLoc method:09-JAN-03Gps date: 0Hae: WS1984Datum: 0Lg pws: Not ReportedPhone ext:Not ReportedPhone: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 459 TC05335716.2r Page A-36 07-SEP-93Prmt decis:14-APR-93Recv dt: L. D. Plante Inc.Prmt proj : CUP Individual (40C-2)Rule type :40C-2Rule type: ClosedPrmt stage:ModificationSeq type: L. D. PLANTE INC.Site nm: 4038Site id : NMonitoring:Production WellStn tp: DStn alias :15456Stn id: 2Seq no:8300Offcl prmt: 3741Cur prmt i:9805Fid: J42 SSE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower FLSJ80000009806FL WELLS FLSJ80000034176Site id: 811603Long no:284207Lat no: -81.26744324Dec long: 28.70189361Dec lat: Public SupplyProj use t:CLOSPrmt app p: https://permitting.sjrwmd.com/epermitting/jsp/DocumentSearch.do?permitNum=8369&seqNo=3&command=OnlySearchLink: InactiveDisc prmt : YProd loade:Not ReportedEdit date: ORACLEPRODEditor:107180Objectid: Out Of ComplianceCmplnc stt:DigitizeStnhdr det: 3Determinat:NGps: 750Max cap qt: AbandonedStn stts: FAS - Upper Floridan AquiferSource:30ERng id: 20STwnshp id:38Sect id: 460Well cur d:322Well csng1: 10Well csng :SeminoleCounty: 50Proj acres: ClosedPrmt stts:ApprovalPrmt recom: Seminole Pines Assoc LtdOwner: Martin Newby Management CorpApplicant: 13-OCT-99Prmt expir: 10-OCT-96Prmt decis:10-OCT-96Recv dt: Seminole Pines Mobile Home ParkPrmt proj : CUP Individual (40C-2)Rule type :40C-2Rule type: ClosedPrmt stage:Transfer of OwnershipSeq type: Seminole Pines Mobile Home ParkSite nm: 11986Site id : NMonitoring:Production WellStn tp: BStn alias :15657Stn id: 3Seq no:8369Offcl prmt: 12071Cur prmt i:34175Fid: I41 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSJ80000034176FL WELLS FLSJ80000009197Site id: 811603Long no:284207Lat no: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 460 TC05335716.2r Page A-37 Not ReportedParcel id: Not ReportedAgency:Not ReportedStreetside: Not ReportedSoftware:Not ReportedOther id: Not ReportedRes type:POTABLEPort stat: UNFILTEREDAction:590033101Wsrp id: 487658Gps id: 487658Loc id: CASSELBERRYCity:32708Zipcode: Not ReportedPostdir:AVESuffix: BRANTLEYStreet:Not ReportedPrefix: Not ReportedPredir:198Number : 198 BRANTLEY AVEAddress:SEMINOLECounty: Not ReportedProperty i:Not ReportedReq numb: Not ReportedInsp chd:Not ReportedInsp lname: Not ReportedInsp fname:ANDREWProject id: MMAPLoc method:30-DEC-99Gps date: 0Hae: WS1984Datum: 0Lg pws: Not ReportedPhone ext:Not ReportedPhone: Not ReportedLast name:Not ReportedFirst name: Not ReportedName:Not ReportedSanit seal: Not ReportedComment : Not ReportedPermit num:0Diameter: 0Length: 0Well depth: 28.70432Latitude: -81.25828Longitude: Not ReportedCasing mat:ACTIVEStatus: 43Well type:590033101Fluwid: 43 NNE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower FLSA80000064031FL WELLS FLSJ80000009806Site id: 811529Long no:284122Lat no: -81.25817949Dec long: 28.68943345Dec lat: Commercial/Industrial/InstitutionalProj use t:CLOSPrmt app p: https://permitting.sjrwmd.com/epermitting/jsp/DocumentSearch.do?permitNum=8300&seqNo=2&command=OnlySearchLink: InactiveDisc prmt : YProd loade:Not ReportedEdit date: ORACLEPRODEditor:111141Objectid: In ComplianceCmplnc stt:DigitizeStnhdr det: 3Determinat:NGps: 0Max cap qt: AbandonedStn stts: FAS - Upper Floridan AquiferSource:31ERng id: 21STwnshp id:38Sect id: 0Well cur d:0Well csng1: 4Well csng :SeminoleCounty: 82Proj acres: ClosedPrmt stts:ApprovalPrmt recom: L D PLANTE INC;L D PLANTE INCOwner: CHARLES SCHOLPPApplicant: 07-SEP-00Prmt expir: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 461 TC05335716.2r Page A-38 19-OCT-01Prmt decis:02-MAR-01Recv dt: Keeth ElementaryPrmt proj : CUP General (40C-20)Rule type :40C-20Rule type: ClosedPrmt stage:RenewalSeq type: Keeth ElementarySite nm: 27468Site id : NMonitoring:Production WellStn tp: 1Stn alias :15895Stn id: 3Seq no:8420Offcl prmt: 70241Cur prmt i:14651Fid: K45 South 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSJ80000014652FL WELLS FLSA80000064026Site id: 0Pws verify: 0Pws design: Not ReportedParcel id: Not ReportedAgency:Not ReportedStreetside: Not ReportedSoftware:Not ReportedOther id: Not ReportedRes type:POTABLEPort stat: UNFILTEREDAction:590032601Wsrp id: 487648Gps id: 487648Loc id: LONGWOODCity:Not ReportedZipcode: Not ReportedPostdir:STSuffix: NEBRASKAStreet:Not ReportedPrefix: Not ReportedPredir:326Number : 326 NEBRASKA STAddress:SEMINOLECounty: Not ReportedProperty i:Not ReportedReq numb: Not ReportedInsp chd:Not ReportedInsp lname: Not ReportedInsp fname:ANDREWProject id: MMAPLoc method:30-DEC-99Gps date: 0Hae: WS1984Datum: 0Lg pws: Not ReportedPhone ext:Not ReportedPhone: Not ReportedLast name:Not ReportedFirst name: Not ReportedName:Not ReportedSanit seal: THERE IS NO WELL NEAR THE SITE. WRONG LOCATIONComment : Not ReportedPermit num:0Diameter: 0Length: 0Well depth: 28.68806Latitude: -81.26234Longitude: Not ReportedCasing mat:ERRORStatus: 43Well type:590032601Fluwid: 44 South 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSA80000064026FL WELLS FLSA80000064031Site id: 0Pws verify: 0Pws design: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 462 TC05335716.2r Page A-39 -81.26294482Dec long: 28.68588977Dec lat: Landscape/Recreation/AestheticProj use t:CLOSPrmt app p: https://permitting.sjrwmd.com/epermitting/jsp/DocumentSearch.do?permitNum=8420&seqNo=2&command=OnlySearchLink: InactiveDisc prmt : YProd loade:Not ReportedEdit date: ORACLEPRODEditor:86899Objectid: In ComplianceCmplnc stt:DigitizeStnhdr det: 3Determinat:NGps: 100Max cap qt: AbandonedStn stts: FAS - Upper Floridan AquiferSource:31ERng id: 21STwnshp id:38Sect id: 204Well cur d:132Well csng1: 6Well csng :SeminoleCounty: 12.3Proj acres: ClosedPrmt stts:ApprovalPrmt recom: Seminole County Public SchoolsOwner: Keeth Elementary SchoolApplicant: 08-FEB-01Prmt expir: 08-FEB-94Prmt decis:08-OCT-93Recv dt: Keeth ElementaryPrmt proj : CUP Individual (40C-2)Rule type :40C-2Rule type: ClosedPrmt stage:RenewalSeq type: KEETH ELEMENTARYSite nm: 4091Site id : NMonitoring:Production WellStn tp: 1Stn alias :15895Stn id: 2Seq no:8420Offcl prmt: 3794Cur prmt i:24849Fid: K46 South 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSJ80000024850FL WELLS FLSJ80000014652Site id: 811547Long no:284109Lat no: -81.26294482Dec long: 28.68588977Dec lat: Landscape/Recreation/AestheticProj use t:CLOSPrmt app p: https://permitting.sjrwmd.com/epermitting/jsp/DocumentSearch.do?permitNum=8420&seqNo=3&command=OnlySearchLink: InactiveDisc prmt : NProd loade:05-OCT-11Edit date: SJONESEditor:65324Objectid: UndeterminedCmplnc stt:DigitizeStnhdr det: 3Determinat:NGps: 100Max cap qt: AbandonedStn stts: FAS - Upper Floridan AquiferSource:31ERng id: 21STwnshp id:38Sect id: 204Well cur d:132Well csng1: 6Well csng :SeminoleCounty: 5.79Proj acres: ClosedPrmt stts:ApprovalPrmt recom: Seminole County Public SchoolsOwner: Keeth Elementary SchoolApplicant: 19-OCT-21Prmt expir: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 463 TC05335716.2r Page A-40 FLSJ80000030614Site id: 811613Long no:284214Lat no: -81.27033997Dec long: 28.70388299Dec lat: Public SupplyProj use t:CLOSPrmt app p: https://permitting.sjrwmd.com/epermitting/jsp/DocumentSearch.do?permitNum=8369&seqNo=3&command=OnlySearchLink: InactiveDisc prmt : YProd loade:Not ReportedEdit date: ORACLEPRODEditor:103282Objectid: Out Of ComplianceCmplnc stt:DigitizeStnhdr det: 3Determinat:NGps: 1200Max cap qt: ProposedStn stts: FAS - Upper Floridan AquiferSource:30ERng id: 20STwnshp id:38Sect id: 500Well cur d:0Well csng1: 12Well csng :SeminoleCounty: 50Proj acres: ClosedPrmt stts:ApprovalPrmt recom: Seminole Pines Assoc LtdOwner: Martin Newby Management CorpApplicant: 13-OCT-99Prmt expir: 10-OCT-96Prmt decis:10-OCT-96Recv dt: Seminole Pines Mobile Home ParkPrmt proj : CUP Individual (40C-2)Rule type :40C-2Rule type: ClosedPrmt stage:Transfer of OwnershipSeq type: Seminole Pines Mobile Home ParkSite nm: 11986Site id : NMonitoring:Production WellStn tp: CStn alias :15658Stn id: 3Seq no:8369Offcl prmt: 12071Cur prmt i:30613Fid: 47 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower FLSJ80000030614FL WELLS FLSJ80000024850Site id: 811547Long no:284109Lat no: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 464 TC05335716.2r Page A-41 0%25%75%1.450 pCi/LBasement 0%0%100%0.630 pCi/LLiving Area % >20 pCi/L% 4-20 pCi/L% <4 pCi/LAverage ActivityArea Number of sites tested: 82 Federal Area Radon Information for SEMINOLE COUNTY, FL : Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L. : Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L. Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L. Federal EPA Radon Zone for SEMINOLE County: 3 Mandatory Residential Database0.0132708 Mandatory Non-Residential Database0.02732708 Certified Residential Database0.028032708 ___________________________________________ Data Source% of sites>4pCi/LTotal BuildingsZip Radon Test Results State Database: FL Radon AREA RADON INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS RADON ® 465 TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Source: United States Geologic Survey EDR acquired the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data with consistent elevation units and projection. Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL. Source: FEMA Telephone: 877-336-2627 Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015 NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetlands Inventory Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8238 HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION AQUIFLOW Information SystemR Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table information. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps. SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Telephone: 800-672-5559 SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county natural resource planning and management. TC05335716.2r Page PSGR-1 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED 466 LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS FEDERAL WATER WELLS PWS: Public Water Systems Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources. PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS). USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS) This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater. STATE RECORDS DEP GWIS - Generalized Water Information System Well Data Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8507 Data collected for the Watershed Monitoring Section of the Department of Environmental Protection. DOH and DEP Historic Study of Private Wells Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-559-0901 Historic database for private supply wells. Well Construction Permitting Database Source: Northwest Florida Water Management District Telephone: 850-539-5999 Consumptive Use Permit Well Database Source: St. Johns River Water Management District Telephone: 386-329-4841 Permitted Well Location Database Source: South Florida Water Management District Telephone: 561-682-6877 Super Act Program Well Data This table consists of data relating to all privately and publicly owned potable wells investigated as part of the SUPER Act program. The Florida Department of Health’s SUPER Act Program (per Chapter 376.3071(4)(g), Florida Statutes), was given authority to provide field and laboratory services, toxicological risk assessments, investigations of drinking water contamination complaints and education of the public Source: Department of Health Telephone: 850-245-4250 Water Well Location Information Source: Suwannee River Water Management District Telephone: 386-796-7211 TC05335716.2r Page PSGR-2 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED 467 Water Well Permit Database Source: Southwest Water Management District Telephone: 352-796-7211 OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION Florida Sinkholes Source: Department of Environmental Protection, Geological Survey The sinkhole data was gathered by the Florida Sinkhole Research Institute, University of Florida. Oil and Gas Permit Database Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-3194 Locations of all permitted wells in the state of Florida. RADON State Database: FL Radon Source: Department of Health Telephone: 850-245-4288 Zip Code Based Radon Data Area Radon Information Source: USGS Telephone: 703-356-4020 The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey. The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at private sources such as universities and research institutions. EPA Radon Zones Source: EPA Telephone: 703-356-4020 Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor radon levels. OTHER Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656 Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary faultlines, prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC05335716.2r Page PSGR-3 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED 468 Appendix E 469 PM PROFESSIONAL RESUMES 470 MICHAEL GREEN, CHMM, CEP FOUNDER & CEO EDUCATION Sacred Heart University—Bachelor of Science in Environmental Science Rutgers University/New Jersey Institute of Technology—Master of Science in Environmental Science *Magna Cum Laude CERTIFICATIONS Certified Hazardous Materials Manager (CHMM-IHMM) Certified Environmental Professional (CEP-ABCEP) OSHA 1910.120 40-hour HAZWOPER Michael Green is the Founder and CEO of LTG Consulting, LLC. and has over 14 years of professional experience. He specializes in a wide variety of Environmental Due Diligence, including Transaction Screens, Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs), and Property Condition Assessments (PCAs). Mr. Green also has experience managing Brownfields Projects. Mr. Green has managed projects of varying sizes ranging from single residential-type properties to portfolios, including large multi-story commercial/industrial facilities. AREAS OF EXPERTISE • Transaction Screens, Phase I and Phase II ESAs—Project duties include project management, data collection, site investigations, subcontractor procurement, sample collection, and preparation/review of reports • Property Condition Assessments—Project duties include project management, data collection, site investigations, subcontractor procurements, and preparation/review of reports • Brownfields Projects—Project duties include project management, execution of Brownfields Site Rehabilitation Agreements (BSBRAs), and preparation of Voluntary Cleanup Tax Credits (VCTC) applications PROJECT EXPERIENCE Lockheed MarKn Tallevast Site, Sarasota, FL - Extremely high profile li\gious case involving large plumes of 1,4-Dioxane below surface in residen\al area; groundwater and soil sampling for monthly repor\ng to state regulatory agency. Conducted numerous soil borings to depths of 300 _ bgs logging soil and recording lithology of the site in order to successfully install groundwater monitoring wells; construc\on over-site of Photo-Cat system and treatment plant; installa\on of over 10 recovery wells; system opera\ons and maintenance of Photo-Cat system; employee training for various employees in order to teach the opera\ons and maintenance to other employees; assisted in design of Remedial Ac\on Report (RAR); worked closely with Community rela\ons liaison for Lockheed Mar\n regarding residents and media in the surrounding area; abandoned over 50 private water supply wells for residents and reported all closures to county agencies and nego\ated closure permits; conducted numerous vapor intrusion surveys and reported data in monthly data reports to regulatory agency. Honeywell, Inc., Tampa, FL - High profile li\gious case involving large plumes of chlorinated solvents (PCE/TCE) below surface in Residen\al area; groundwater and soil sampling using low flow sampling, diffusion bag samplers and bailers; scheduled all field ac\vi\es for site work; system operations and 471 maintenance on Dual Phase Extraction (DPE) system for the remediation of high concentrations of chlorinated solvents; prepared monthly status reports for regulatory agencies; adended meetings with regulatory agencies to discuss and negotiate cleanup requirements. Project Gator, Mul\ple Loca\ons, GA & FL - Project Manager for Phase I ESAs, Phase II ESAs, Limited Water Supply Evalua\ons, and Limited Compliance Evalua\ons. Phase I ESAs were performed on a large porgolio of 22 agricultural proper\es located in Florida and Georgia, with individual proper\es ranging in size from 15 to 400 acres. Land use was primarily agricultural with three proper\es performing produce processing and equipment maintenance in addi\on to farming, where Limited Compliance Evalua\on was also warranted. Managed project team of 26 personnel to accommodate short project schedule. Performed site reconnaissance, reviewed per\nent records, interviewed property representa\ves and regulatory personnel, and made recommenda\ons based on findings. Planned and performed Phase II ESAs on 11 proper\es, including soil screening and sampling, and groundwater and surface water sampling. Performed regional Limited Water Supply Evalua\on to examine feasibility as con\nued use as farmland. An addi\onal 23 proper\es were being considered as a lease package, where limited environmental due diligence was performed, consis\ng of site reconnaissance and limited records review. Results of assessments were used by client to evaluate risks associated with acquisi\on or leasing, and con\nued farming and produce processing at the proper\es. Project Flight, Mul\ple Loca\ons, Mul\ple States - Conducted eight Phase I ESAs and RCRA Compliance Audits on large scrap metal recycling proper\es located in Florida, Georgia, Pennsylvania, New York, and Michigan. Individual proper\es ranged in size from 5 to 20 acres. Reviewed per\nent records, interviewed property representa\ve and regulatory personnel, and made recommenda\ons based on findings. Results of assessments were used by client to evaluate risks associated with acquisi\on and development of the proper\es. Silco ProperKes Inc., Lakeland, FL - Requested to give a deposi\on for a court case regarding a contaminated property transac\on lawsuit. Conducted site assessment under 62-780 of the Florida Administra\ve Code (F.A.C.) using membrane interface probe (MIP) technology for soil data and analysis. Direct contact with u\li\es and Public Works department for required permits/access agreements. Monitoring well installa\on and sampling. Prepared a SAR for submittal to the Florida Department of Environmental Protec\on (FDEP). WCI, Inc., Sun City Center, FL - Conducted soil and groundwater sampling to address arsenic contamination surrounding a golf course maintenance facility. Collected mul\ple soil and groundwater samples; used GPS unit to locate samples and overlay sample loca\ons onto a site map using AutoCAD. Submided and obtained approval for site assessment report (SAR) and Interim Source Removal (ISR) report. Submidal of Natural Adenua\on Monitoring Plan (NAMP) for No Further Ac\on (NFA) with institu\onal and engineering controls. Crosland Inc., Tampa, FL - Preparation of Directors Authoriza\on Modifica\on Permit to receive authoriza\on for construction on a previous city landfill; developed Materials Management & Leachate Plan and a Landfill Gas Mi\ga\on System monitoring plan; conducted a Supplemental Soil Investiga\on followed by a Supplemental Soil Report which included soil sampling and soil vapor sampling. Uploaded documents to various FTP sites for client viewing; prepared figures and tables; worked closely with the Environmental Protec\on Commission of Hillsborough County (EPCHC) for perminng. Universal Studios, Orlando, FL & Hollywood, CA - Project management and preparation of lock out tag out (LOTO) procedures for theme parks and buildings; identified all energy sources of various types of machines and appliances in order to reduce the unit to zero energy so that maintenance can be performed on the unit. Compiled data using Microso_ access and prepared actual safety catalogues of each of the machines and appliances. Received recogni\on award for the superior work carried out on the project. 472 473 Appendix F 474 PM Environmental, Inc. Common Acronyms & Terms Page 1 of 2 COMMON ACRONYMS AND TERMINOLOGY USED IN THE COURSE OF THIS PHASE I ESA The following is a list of common acronyms: All Appropriate Inquiry AAI Asbestos Containing Materials ACM Aboveground Storage Tank AST American Society for Testing Materials ASTM Approximate Minimum Search Distance ASMD Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act CERCLA Environmental Data Resources EDR Environmental Site Assessment ESA Federal Emergency Response Notification System ERNS Large Quantity Generator LQG Leaking Underground Storage Tank LUST National Priority List NPL No Further Remedial Action Planned NFRAP PM Environmental, Inc. PME Polychlorinated Biphenyls PCBs Resource Conservation and Recovery Act RCRA Small Quantity Generator SQG Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility TSD Underground Storage Tank UST United States Environmental Protection Agency USEPA TERMINOLOGY The following provides definitions and descriptions of certain terms that may be used in this report. Several terms are defined by ASTM Standard Practice E 1527. The Standard Practice should be referenced for further detail (such as the precise wording), related definitions, or additional explanation regarding the meaning of terms. Asbestos containing material (ACM): Any material found to contain greater than 1% asbestos using an analytical method that is approved by the USEPA for asbestos analysis. De minimis conditions: Conditions that generally do not present a material risk or harm to public health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies. Friable material: Defined in the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) as a material that can be pulverized or reduced to dust using hand pressure only. General risk of enforcement action: The likelihood that an environmental condition would be subject to enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate 475 PM Environmental, Inc. Common Acronyms & Terms Page 2 of 2 governmental agencies. If the circumstances suggest an enforcement action would be more likely than not, then the condition is considered a general risk of enforcement action. Historical recognized environmental condition (HREC): Environmental condition which in the past would have been considered a recognized environmental condition, but which may or may not be considered a recognized environmental condition currently. The final decision rests with the environmental professional and will be influenced by the current impact of the historical recognized environmental condition on the subject property. If a past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products has occurred in connection with the subject property, with such remediation accepted by the responsible regulatory agency (for example, as evidenced by the issuance of a no further action letter or equivalent), this condition shall be considered a historical recognized environmental condition. Non-friable material: Defined by National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) as a material that cannot be pulverized or reduced to dust using hand pressure only. According to NESHAP, non-friable building materials include those in Category I (packings, gaskets, resilient floor coverings/adhesives, and asphalt roofing materials) and those in Category II (all other materials). Recognized environmental condition (REC): The presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products on a property under conditions that indicate an existing release, a past release, or a material threat of a release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products into structures on the subject property or into the ground, ground water, or surface water of the subject property. The term includes hazardous substances or petroleum products even under conditions in compliance with laws. The term is not intended to include de minimis conditions that generally do not present a material risk of harm to public health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies. Subject property: The area that is the focus of a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment. The boundaries are not necessarily consistent with recorded legal descriptions of real estate, and are defined by the User. Suspect ACM of concern: Defined as “(I) all friable suspect ACMs (II) any non-friable suspect ACMs expected to be disturbed by renovation or demolition activities planned for the subject property.” 476 Phase I ESA Scope of Services PM Environmental, Inc. Page 1 General Scope of Services for Phase I ESA The purpose of the Phase I ESA is to gather sufficient information to develop an independent professional opinion about the environmental condition of the subject property. The ESA will be conducted in an attempt to satisfy the ASTM Standard (E-1527-13) and the U.S. EPA Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiry as defined in the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act. The Phase I ESA will encompass the following scope of work: Records Review Federal and State database search for sites within the ASTM approximate minimum search distances. Review of one or more additional state environmental record sources (e.g., fire department, health department, published local or state site contamination lists, etc.). PM is typically exhaustive in inquiry with these resources. Utilization of as many of the ASTM standard historical sources as necessary and as reasonably ascertainable and likely to be useful to document all obvious uses of the subject property from the present, back to the subject property’s first developed usage (agricultural or the placement of fill) or 1940, whichever is earlier (e.g., aerial photographs, fire insurance maps, topographic maps, street directories, building record and other sources including knowledgeable interviewees). PM is typically exhaustive in usage of these resources to document subject property historical usages. Chain of title is not typically consulted by PM unless all other standard and historical sources cannot adequately document subject property usages or if required by a lender. A separate fee to the lump sum quoted will be assessed for obtainment of chain of title. A records review in accordance with the requirements for a Vapor Intrusion Assessment per ASTM E- 2600-08 is not included in this scope of work. Site Reconnaissance The objective of the site reconnaissance is to obtain information regarding the likelihood of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the subject property. The exterior of the subject property and any structures, as well as, pathways, roads, etc., will be visually and physically observed. The interior of the structures on the subject property will be visually and physically observed. This includes all common areas, maintenance and repair rooms, boiler rooms and representative number of occupant spaces. Observations under floors, above ceilings or behind walls are not required unless specified by requirements other than the ASTM standard. PM will evaluate non-ASTM scope issues with a visual inspection, and comment on asbestos containing building materials, lead based paint, and water intrusion associated with mold. Sampling is not included within this scope of work, but can be completed under a separate proposal. Current and past uses of the subject property and adjoining properties, and general uses of surrounding properties, to the extent visually and physically observed will be recorded. Emphasis is placed on subject property or adjoining property usages involving use, treatment, storage, disposal or generation of hazardous substances or petroleum products. These observations may include process details on raw material and waste management practices. General description of structures and improvements on the subject property (number and age of buildings, ancillary structures, utilities, storage tanks, hazardous substance and petroleum product usage, general chemical or raw material usage, heating and cooling, stains, solid waste, waste water, etc.). Interviews with Owners and Occupants Interviews with owners, occupants, key site manager and user (person on behalf Phase I ESA conducted), typically with regard to information about current and historical uses, general site setting information, site specific documents, litigation, administrative orders, notices of violations with regard to environmental issues, etc. 477 Phase I ESA Scope of Services PM Environmental, Inc. Page 2 Interviews with Local Government Officials A reasonable attempt will be made to interview at least one staff member of any of the following: the local fire department, the local agency or state agency having jurisdiction over environmental matters in the area in which the subject property is located, and/or the local health department. PM is typically exhaustive in its inquiry of these sources, unless professional experience has indicated the resource is not beneficial. Evaluation and Report Preparation The report of the Phase I ESA findings will generally follow the ASTM format unless otherwise requested by the client or as outlined in any applicable lender requirements. The report will include documentation of sources, methodology, limitations, and credentials. Liability/risk evaluations, recommendations for Phase II ESA testing and remediation techniques are not provided within the scope of an ASTM performed assessment. Phase I ESA reports are kept in the strictest client confidence and are issued directly to the client. Issuance or reliance on the Phase I ESA report for purposes of making loan decisions by a private lender may be included in the Phase I ESA report if specified by the client. 478 PM Environmental, Inc. User’s Continuing Obligations Page 1 of 2 USER’S CONTINUING OBLIGATIONS UNDER CERCLA Conducting a Phase I ESA alone does not provide a landowner with protection against CERCLA liability. Landowners who want to maintain a bona Fide Prospective Purchaser, an Innocent Landowner, or a Contiguous Property Owner Defense must also comply with other pre-acquisition and post-acquisition requirements in the CERCLA regulations and AAI standards. The responsibilities for each defense are summarized below. Bona Fide Prospective Purchaser Responsibilities The Bona Fide Prospective Purchaser defense is intended for individuals or entities purchasing a property known to be contaminated. To obtain and maintain the defense, the individual or entity seeking the defense must also satisfy the following requirements (AAI, Section II D.1.): Have acquired a property after all disposal activities involving hazardous substances ceased at the property; Provide all legally required notices with respect to the discovery or release of any hazardous substances at the property; Exercise appropriate care by taking reasonable steps to stop continuing releases, prevent any threatened future releases, and prevent or limit human, environmental, or natural resources exposure to any previously released hazardous substance; Provide full cooperation, assistance, and access to persons authorized to conduct response actions or natural resource restorations; Comply with land use restrictions established or relied on in connection with a response action; Not impede the effectiveness or integrity of any institutional controls; Comply with any CERCLA request for information or administrative subpoena; and Not be potentially liable, or affiliated with any other person who is potentially liable for response costs for addressing releases at the property. Innocent Landowner Responsibilities The Innocent Landowner Defense protects individuals or entities (ultimately the “property owner”) purchasing a property that is not known to be contaminated. The property owner must also satisfy the following requirements to obtain and maintain the defense (AAI, Section II D.3 and CERCLA Section 107(b)(3)): Have no reason to know that any hazardous substance which is the subject of a release of threatened release was disposed of on, in, or at the facility; Provide full cooperation, assistance and access to persons authorized to conduct response actions at the property; Comply with any land use restrictions and not impeding the effectiveness or integrity of any institutional controls; 479 PM Environmental, Inc. User’s Continuing Obligations Page 2 of 2 Take reasonable steps to stop continuing releases, prevent any threatened release, and prevent to limit human, environmental, or natural resource exposure to any hazardous substances released on or from the landowner’s property; Demonstrate that the act or omission that caused the release or threat of release of hazardous substances and the resulting damages were caused by the third party with whom the person does not have employment, agency, or contractual relationship; Exercise due care with respect to the hazardous substance concerned, taking into consideration the characteristics of such hazardous substance, in light of all relevant facts and circumstances; Take precautions against foreseeable acts or omissions of a third party and the consequences that could result from such acts or omissions. Contiguous Property Owner Defense The Contiguous Property Owner Defense protects individuals or entities purchasing a property that is not known to be contaminated, but could be contaminated by migration from a contiguous property owned by someone else. To qualify as a contiguous property owner, a landowner must have no knowledge of contamination prior to acquisition, or reason to know of contamination at the time of acquisition, have conducted AAI, and meet all of the criteria set forth in AAI Section II.D.2 and CERCLA Section 107(q)(1)(A), which include: Not cause, contribute, or consent to the release or threatened release; Not be potentially liable nor affiliated with nay other person potentially liable for response costs at the property; Take reasonable steps to stop continuing releases, prevent any threatened release, and prevent or limit human, environmental, or natural resource exposure to any hazardous substances released on or from the landowner’s property; Provide full cooperation, assistance, and access to persons authorized to conduct response actions or natural resource restorations; Comply with land use restrictions established or relied on in connection with a response action; Not impede the effectiveness or integrity of any institutional controls; Comply with any CERCLA request for information or administrative subpoena; Provide all legally required notices with respect to discovery or release of any hazardous substances at the property. Persons who know, or have reason to know, that the property is or could be contaminated at the time of acquisition of a property cannot qualify for the liability protection as a contiguous property owner, but may be entitles to Bona Fide Prospective Purchaser status. 480 REPORT COVER PAGE Geotechnical Engineering Report Chase Bank-Tuskawilla Road Tuskawilla Road and SR 434 Oviedo, Seminole County, Florida October 30, 2018 Terracon Project No. H1185164 Prepared for: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Orlando, Florida Prepared by: Terracon Consultants, Inc. Winter Park, Florida 481 Terracon Consultants, Inc. 1675 Lee Road Winter Park, Florida 32789 P (407) 740 6110 F (407) 740 6112 terracon.com REPORT COVER LETTER TO SIGN October 30, 2018 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 189 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 10000 Orlando, Florida 32801 Attn: Ms. Jennifer Stickler P:(407) 427 1682 E:Jennifer.Stickler@kimley-horn.com Re: Geotechnical Engineering Report Chase Bank-Tuskawilla Road Tuskawilla Road and SR 434 Oviedo, Seminole County, Florida Terracon Project No. H1185164 Dear Ms. Client: We have completed geotechnical engineering services for the above referenced project. This study was performed in general accordance with Terracon Proposal No. PH1175164, revision dated June 4, 2018. This report presents the findings of the subsurface exploration and provides geotechnical recommendations concerning earthwork and the design and construction of foundations, floor slabs, and pavements for the proposed project. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions concerning this report, or if we may be of further service, please contact us. Sincerely, Terracon Consultants, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 8830 Brendan S. O’Brien, P.E.Bruce H. Woloshin, P.E. Senior Geotechnical Engineer Principal Florida PE #52047 This report has been electronically signed and sealed by Brendan S. O’Brien, P.E. on October 30, 2018 using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. 482 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable REPORT TOPICS REPORT TOPICS REPORT SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... i INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 SITE CONDITIONS ......................................................................................................... 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................. 4 GEOTECHNICAL CHARACTERIZATION ...................................................................... 5 GEOTECHNICAL OVERVIEW ....................................................................................... 6 EARTHWORK................................................................................................................. 7 SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS ......................................................................................... 10 SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS ...................................................................................... 12 FLOOR SLABS............................................................................................................. 12 PAVEMENTS ................................................................................................................ 14 GENERAL COMMENTS ............................................................................................... 18 Note: This report was originally delivered in a web-based format.Orange Bold text in the report indicates a referenced section heading. The PDF version also includes hyperlinks which direct the reader to that section and clicking on the logo will bring you back to this page. For more interactive features, please view your project online at client.terracon.com. ATTACHMENTS EXPLORATION AND TESTING PROCEDURES SITE LOCATION AND EXPLORATION PLANS EXPLORATION RESULTS SUPPORTING INFORMATION 483 Geotechnical Engineering Report Chase Bank-Tuskawilla Road ■ Oviedo, Seminole County, Florida October 30, 2018 ■ Terracon Project No. H1185164 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable i REPORT SUMMARY Topic 1 Overview Statement 2, 3 Project Description 3,558 square foot structure Max. Column loads: 120 kips, Max. Wall loads: 3½ kips per linear foot Up to 3 feet of fill to achieve final grade Little excavation other than foundation construction Expected traffic for pavement areas: ■Light duty (car parking only): 30,000 equivalent 18-kip single axle loads (E18SALs) ■Heavy duty (truck traffic, driveways): 50,000 E18SALs Geotechnical Characterization Upper and lower layers of sand with silt, with an intermediate layer of clayey sand to hardpan Groundwater encountered between depths of4 ½ feet and 5 feet. Seasonal high groundwater table estimated at a depth of3 ½ feet Earthwork Traditional surface compaction Shallow Foundations Shallow foundations will be sufficient Allowable bearing pressure, columns = 3,000 lbs/sq ft Allowable bearing pressure, walls = 2,500 lbs/sq ft Expected settlements: < 1 inch total, < ½ inch differential Pavements With subgrade prepared as noted in Earthwork Asphalt: ■1½” ACC over 6” base over 12” stabilized subbase in Light Duty areas (car parking only) ■2½” ACC over 8” base over 12” stabilized subbase in Heavy Duty areas (trucks, driveways). Concrete: ■5” PCC in Light Duty areas ■7” PCC in Heavy Duty areas General Comments This section contains important information about the limitations of this geotechnical engineering report. 1.If the reader is reviewing this report as a pdf, the topics above can be used to access the appropriate section of the report by simply clicking on the topic itself. 2.This summary is for convenience only. It should be used in conjunction with the entire report for design purposes. 3.Highlighted text are assumptions and should be verified by the project team. 484 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 1 INTRODUCTION Geotechnical Engineering Report Chase Bank-Tuskawilla Road Tuskawilla Road and SR 434 Oviedo, Seminole County, Florida Terracon Project No. H1185164 October 30, 2018 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering services performed for the proposed Chase Bank to be located at Tuskawilla Road and SR 434 in Oviedo, Seminole County, Florida. The purpose of these services is to provide information and geotechnical engineering recommendations relative to: ■Subsurface soil conditions ■Foundation design and construction ■Groundwater conditions ■Floor slab design and construction ■Site preparation and earthwork ■Seismic site classification per FBC ■Stormwater pond considerations ■Pavement design and construction The geotechnical engineering scope of services for this project included the advancement of five test borings to depths ranging from approximately 10 to 20 feet below existing site grades. Maps showing the site and boring locations are shown in the Site Location and Exploration Plan sections, respectively. The results of the laboratory testing performed on soil samples obtained from the site during the field exploration are included on the boring logs in the Exploration Results section of this report. SITE CONDITIONS The following description of site conditions is derived from our site visit in association with the field exploration and our review of publicly available geologic and topographic maps as well as other published sources. Item Description Parcel Information The project is located at the east corner of the intersection of Tuskawilla Road and SR 434 in Oviedo, Seminole County, Florida. The approximate center of the site is located at latitude 28.696463° N longitude -81.261474° W. See Site Location. 485 Geotechnical Engineering Report Chase Bank-Tuskawilla Road ■ Oviedo, Seminole County, Florida October 30, 2018 ■ Terracon Project No. H1185164 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 2 Item Description Existing Improvements None. Current Ground Cover Bare soil. Site was recently cleared, previously heavily vegetated. Existing Topography The USGS topographic quadrangle map “Casselberry, Florida” depicts native site grade as nearly level to gently sloping, with native ground surface between elevations +40 feet and +45 feet, referencing the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (NGVD29). Surface Water Numerous wet detention ponds are visible in the site vicinity. The USGS topographic quadrangle map “Casselberry, Florida” depicts an isolated swamp about 1,200 feet south of the site, at about elevation +40 feet, and Lake Jessup about 3,000 feet northeast of the site, with a water level approximating mean sea level. Regional Geology According to Soil Survey of Seminole County, Florida, the lithology of the site vicinity generally consists of undifferentiated clastic surface material, underlain by the Hawthorn Group, underlain by the Ocala Limestone. As interpreted from the generally east-west cross section in Figure 2 of the Soil Survey of Seminole County, the undifferentiated clastic surface material extends to about 50 feet below mean sea level (about 90 feet thick) and the Hawthorn Group extends to about 80 feet below mean sea level (about 30 feet thick). The Soil Survey describes deeper limestone units which are not considered relevant to this report and therefore are not discussed further within this report. The clastic material overlying the Hawthorn Group consists of sand, clay, and shell material. Generally, sandy or clayey shell material directly overlies the Hawthorn Group with clayey sand overlying that material and relatively pure sand extending from there to the surface. Beneath the surficial undifferentiated clastic material is the Hawthorn Group. The Hawthorn Group consists of sand, silt, and clay and some limestone or dolostone beds. Black to amber grains of phosphate are very common and are intermixed throughout. In addition, these lithologies are typically intermixed with each other. Very few pure, one-lithology beds are in the Hawthorn Group. The Hawthorn Group confines the artesian aquifer within the limestone units beneath the Hawthorn Group. The Ocala Limestone is typically almost pure limestone with no dolostone. The Ocala limestone consists of a loose to moderately well cemented mass of very small to large microfossils. The depth and thickness of the Ocala Limestone is generally indeterminate according to the Soil Survey. 486 Geotechnical Engineering Report Chase Bank-Tuskawilla Road ■ Oviedo, Seminole County, Florida October 30, 2018 ■ Terracon Project No. H1185164 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 3 The Ocala Limestone, where present, is the uppermost limestone layer in Seminole County. The Floridan Aquifer, which is generally a confined aquifer, is located within the Ocala Limestone and deeper limestone layers. Generally, it is within these limestone layers where sinkholes originate. General Potential for Sinkhole Development Sinkhole development occurs in Florida and varies geographically from areas with almost no potential or a very low potential to areas with a high potential where sinkholes occur frequently. The subject property is located in Area II on the United States Geological Survey map entitled “Sinkhole Type, Development, and Distribution in Florida”. The cover (over limestone bedrock) in Area II is between 30 to 200 feet thick and is predominantly sandy. Sinkholes are few, shallow, and of small diameter and develop gradually in Area II. The risk of sinkhole occurrence at most sites is small even in areas known to have a higher than average risk of sinkhole occurrence. A review of the Florida Geologic Survey’s sinkhole database (updated March 4, 2014) reveals the closest reported sinkhole is about 1½ miles southwest of the subject site. It should be noted that the number of sinkholes is based on information reported to the FGS and does not necessarily reflect the number of sinkholes confirmed by public or private industry. During our limited evaluation, we did not encounter traditional signs associated with potential sinkhole development including abnormal downward pore water pressure gradients, obvious raveled zones, surface depressions, etc. However, this evaluation was not planned to specifically address sinkhole potential. If the sinkhole potential of the site is to be evaluated, additional site-specific data must be obtained. This might include using geophysical methods such as Electrical Resistivity tests and additional geotechnical tests such as Cone Penetrometer Test (CPT) soundings, dilatometer (DMT) soundings, and/or more/deeper Standard Penetration Test borings. Interpretation of the test data should be done by a professional geologist/engineer familiar with the use of these tests under local conditions. However, it should be noted that even if indicators of sinkhole activity are found, it is impossible to predict if, when or precisely where a sinkhole may occur. If requested, Terracon can assist in assessing the sinkhole potential of the location of the proposed construction. Soil Survey The Soil Survey of Seminole County, Florida as prepared by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Soil Conservation Service (SCS; later renamed the Natural Resource Conservation Service - NRCS), dated March 1990, identifies the soil type at the subject site as Tavares-Millhopper complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes (31). A Soils Map is included with this GeoReport, depicting the applicable Soil Survey map portion for the subject site. 487 Geotechnical Engineering Report Chase Bank-Tuskawilla Road ■ Oviedo, Seminole County, Florida October 30, 2018 ■ Terracon Project No. H1185164 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 4 31 – Tavares-Millhopper fine sands, 0 to 5 percent slopes. This soil type is nearly level to gently sloping and moderately well drained. It is typically found on low ridges and knolls on the uplands. In its natural state and during years of normal rainfall, the soils in this map unit have a seasonal high groundwater table at a depth of between 36 and 60 inches (3.0 and 5.0 feet) for 2 to 6 months. The seasonal high groundwater table is apparent in Tavares soil but perched in Millhopper soil. Tavares fine sand is predominantly sandy throughout the defined profile of 80 inches (6.7 feet). Millhopper fine sand is predominantly sandy to a typical depth of 45 inches (3.8 feet), transitioning to silty sand to clayey sand thereafter (USCS Classification symbol SM to SC). PROJECT DESCRIPTION Our initial understanding of the project was provided in our proposal and was discussed in the project planning stage. A period of collaboration has transpired since the project was initiated, and our final understanding of the project conditions is as follows. Items that remain assumptions are highlighted in the following table. Item Description Information Provided We have been provided with a site plan showing how the Chase Bank will fit on to the site. Project Description The proposed bank is planned with a primary bank building, satellite drive through building, parking lots and driveways. Proposed Structure The project includes a single-story building with a footprint of 3,558 square feet. The building will be slab-on-grade (non-basement). Building Construction Structural steel and concrete with a plywood roof deck on pre-engineered roof trusses, cold-formed steel framed walls supported on shallow isolated column footing foundations and a concrete slab-on-grade with turned-down section along the building perimeter. Finished Floor Elevation Unknown. Assumed to be within about 2 to 3 feet above existing grade according to site grading. Maximum Loads ■Columns: 120 kips ■Walls: 3½ kips per linear foot (klf) ■Slabs: 150 pounds per square foot (psf) Grading/Slopes No cut grading and 3 feet of fill will be utilized to develop final grade. Final slope angles of as steep as 3H:1V (Horizontal: Vertical) are expected. Pavements We assume both flexible (asphalt) and rigid (concrete) pavement sections are being considered. Anticipated traffic is as follows: ■Light Duty (car parking only: 30,000 equivalent 18-kip single axle loads (E18SALs) ■Heavy Duty (truck traffic, driveways): 50,000 E18SALs The pavement design period is 20 years. 488 Geotechnical Engineering Report Chase Bank-Tuskawilla Road ■ Oviedo, Seminole County, Florida October 30, 2018 ■ Terracon Project No. H1185164 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 5 Item Description Estimated Start of Construction Spring 2019 GEOTECHNICAL CHARACTERIZATION Subsurface Profile We have developed a general characterization of the subsurface conditions based upon our review of the subsurface exploration, laboratory data, geologic setting and our understanding of the project. This characterization, termed GeoModel, forms the basis of our geotechnical calculations and evaluation of site preparation and foundation options. Conditions encountered at each exploration point are indicated on the individual logs. The individual logs and the GeoModel can be found in the Exploration Results section of this GeoReport. As part of our analyses, we identified the following model layers within the subsurface profile. For a more detailed view of the model layer depths at each boring location, refer to the GeoModel. Model Layer Layer Name General Description 1 Upper sand with silt Sand with silt to sand 2 Hydraulically restrictive Clayey sand to sand with silt and some cementation (hardpan) 3 Lower sand with silt Sand with silt Groundwater Conditions The borings were observed during drilling for the presence and level of groundwater. Groundwater levels were measured at depths of about 4½ feet to 5 feet in the SPT borings. Longer term monitoring in cased holes or piezometers would be required to better define groundwater conditions at the site. It should be recognized that fluctuations of the groundwater table will occur due to seasonal variations in the amount of rainfall, runoff and other factors not evident at the time the boring was performed. In addition, perched water can develop within higher permeability soils overlying less permeable soils. Therefore, groundwater levels during construction or at other times in the future may be higher or lower than the levels indicated on the boring logs. We estimate that during the normal wet season (typically June through October) with rainfall and recharge at a maximum, groundwater levels will be about 3½ feet below the existing grade. Our estimates of the seasonal groundwater conditions are based on the USDA Soil Survey, the 489 Geotechnical Engineering Report Chase Bank-Tuskawilla Road ■ Oviedo, Seminole County, Florida October 30, 2018 ■ Terracon Project No. H1185164 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 6 encountered soil types, and the measured water levels. The water levels observed in the boreholes can be found on the boring logs in Exploration Results, and are summarized below. Boring Number Approximate Depth to Groundwater while Drilling (feet)1 Approximate Depth to Estimated Seasonal High Groundwater (feet)1 B-1 4½3½ B-2 5 3½ B-3 5 3½ B-4 5 3½ B-5 5 3½ 1.Below ground surface These seasonal groundwater table estimates do not represent the temporary rise in water table that occurs immediately following a storm event, including adjacent to other stormwater management facilities. This is different from static groundwater levels in wet ponds and/or drainage canals which can affect the design water levels of new, nearby ponds. The seasonal high groundwater table may vary from normal when affected by extreme weather changes, localized or regional flooding, karst activity, future grading, drainage improvements, or other construction that may occur on or around the site following the date of this report. GEOTECHNICAL OVERVIEW Borings encountered sand with silt to sand, over clayey sand to sand with silt and some cementation (hardpan), over sand with silt. These materials are generally suitable for construction of the proposed foundations, floor slabs, and pavements following site preparation according to the recommendations provided in the Earthwork section. Seasonal high groundwater levels should be considered in the civil engineering design for site grading, utility construction, and pavements. The Shallow Foundations section addresses support of the building bearing on in-place soil or engineered fill. The Floor Slabs section addresses slab-on-grade support of the building. Flexible asphalt and/or rigid concrete pavement systems may be considered for this project. The Pavements section addresses the design of pavement systems. The General Comments section provides an understanding of the report limitations. 490 Geotechnical Engineering Report Chase Bank-Tuskawilla Road ■ Oviedo, Seminole County, Florida October 30, 2018 ■ Terracon Project No. H1185164 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 7 EARTHWORK Earthwork may include grubbing (of any remaining vegetation or root systems), and will include excavations and fill placement (depending on site grading). The following sections provide recommendations for use in the preparation of specifications for the work. Recommendations include critical quality criteria as necessary to render the site in the state considered in our geotechnical engineering evaluation for foundations, floor slabs, and pavements. Site Preparation Prior to placing fill, existing vegetation and root mat should be removed. Complete stripping of the topsoil should be performed in the proposed building and parking/driveway areas. The subgrade should be proof-rolled. Proof-rolling can be performed with appropriate heavy equipment (typically a smooth drum roller or a fully loaded tandem axle dump truck) to obtain a minimum compaction defined as follows. The proof-rolling should be performed under the direction of the Geotechnical Engineer. Areas excessively deflecting under the proofroll should be delineated and subsequently addressed by the Geotechnical Engineer. Excessively wet or dry material should either be removed, or moisture conditioned and recompacted. Fill Material Types Fill required to achieve design grade should be classified as structural fill and general fill. Structural fill is material used below, or within 10 feet of structures, pavements or constructed slopes. General fill is material used to achieve grade outside of these areas. Earthen materials used for structural and general fill should meet the following material property requirements: Soil Quality1 USCS Classification Acceptable Location for Placement Maximum Lift Thickness (in.) Preferred SP (fines content < 5%) All locations and elevations except as backfill of utility trenches cut into higher fines content soils. 12 3 Common SP-SM (fines content between 5 and 12%)2 All locations and elevations except where free-draining is necessary. Strict moisture control will be required during placement, particularly during the rainy season. 8 to 12 3 Limited SM, SC (fines content >12%) Limited to backfill of utility trenches cut into similar soils. Strict moisture control will be required during placement. 6 to 8 4 491 Geotechnical Engineering Report Chase Bank-Tuskawilla Road ■ Oviedo, Seminole County, Florida October 30, 2018 ■ Terracon Project No. H1185164 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 8 Soil Quality1 USCS Classification Acceptable Location for Placement Maximum Lift Thickness (in.) Severely Limited CH, CL, MH, ML Should not be used for this project.N/A 1.Controlled, compacted fill should consist of approved materials that are free of organic matter and debris. 2.If fines contents are greater than 12 percent, special design and construction procedures may be necessary. 3.Loose thickness when heavy compaction equipment is used in vibratory mode. Lift thickness should be decreased if static compaction is being used, typically to no more than 8 inches, and the required compaction must still be achieved. Use 4 to 6 inches in loose thickness when hand-guided equipment (i.e. jumping jack or plate compactor) is required. 4.Static equipment should be used. Fill Compaction Requirements Structural and general fill should meet the following compaction requirements. Item Structural Fill Minimum Compaction Requirements1 95 percent of the material’s maximum modified Proctor dry density (ASTM D 1557). Moisture Content 2 Within ±2 percent of optimum moisture content as determined by the Modified Proctor test, at the time of placement and compaction. Minimum Testing Frequency One field density test per 10,000 square feet or fraction thereof per 1-foot lift. 1.We recommend that engineered fill be tested for moisture content and compaction during placement. Should the results of the in-place density tests indicate the specified moisture or compaction limits have not been met, the area represented by the test should be reworked and retested as required until the specified moisture and compaction requirements are achieved. 2.Specifically, moisture levels should be maintained low enough to allow for satisfactory compaction to be achieved without the cohesionless fill material pumping when proofrolled. Utility Trench Backfill All trench excavations should be made with sufficient working space to permit construction including backfill placement and compaction. Utility trenches are a common source of water infiltration and migration. All utility trenches that penetrate beneath the building should be backfilled with soils of similar fines content and permeability to avoid creating a preferred flow path through the trenches. 492 Geotechnical Engineering Report Chase Bank-Tuskawilla Road ■ Oviedo, Seminole County, Florida October 30, 2018 ■ Terracon Project No. H1185164 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 9 Grading and Drainage All grades must provide effective drainage away from the building during and after construction Final surrounding grades should be sloped away from the structure on all sides to prevent ponding of water. Gutters, downspouts, or other appropriate methods that direct water a minimum of 10 feet beyond the footprint of the proposed structures are recommended. Site grades should be set considering the estimated seasonal high groundwater presented in Geotechnical Characterization. Where paving or flatwork abuts the structure a maintenance program should be established to effectively seal and maintain joints and prevent surface water infiltration. Earthwork Construction Considerations After initial proofrolling and compaction, unstable subgrade conditions could develop during general construction operations, particularly if the soils are wetted and/or subjected to repetitive construction traffic. Upon completion of filling and grading, care should be taken to maintain the subgrade moisture content prior to construction of floor slabs and pavements. Construction traffic over the completed subgrade should be avoided to the extent practical. The site should also be graded to prevent ponding of surface water on the prepared subgrades or in excavations. If the subgrade should become desiccated, saturated, or disturbed, the affected material should be removed or these materials should be scarified, moisture conditioned, and re-compacted prior to floor slab and pavement construction. Trees or other vegetation whose root systems have the ability to excessively remove moisture or that may displace the foundations or flatwork should not be planted next to the structures (foundations, pavements, sidewalks, etc.). As a minimum, all temporary excavations should be sloped or braced as required by Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) regulations to provide stability and safe working conditions. Temporary excavations will probably be required during grading operations. The grading contractor, by his contract, is usually responsible for designing and constructing stable, temporary excavations and should shore, slope or bench the sides of the excavations as required, to maintain stability of both the excavation sides and bottom. All excavations should comply with applicable local, state and federal safety regulations, including the current OSHA Excavation and Trench Safety Standards. Construction site safety is the sole responsibility of the contractor who controls the means, methods, and sequencing of construction operations. Under no circumstances shall the information provided herein be interpreted to mean Terracon is assuming responsibility for construction site safety, or the contractor's activities; such responsibility shall neither be implied nor inferred. 493 Geotechnical Engineering Report Chase Bank-Tuskawilla Road ■ Oviedo, Seminole County, Florida October 30, 2018 ■ Terracon Project No. H1185164 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 10 Construction Observation and Testing The earthwork efforts should be monitored under the direction of the Geotechnical Engineer. Monitoring should include documentation of adequate removal of vegetation and topsoil, proofrolling, and mitigation of areas delineated by the proofroll to require mitigation. Each lift of compacted fill should be tested, evaluated, and reworked, as necessary, until approved by the Geotechnical Engineer prior to placement of additional lifts. Each lift of fill should be tested for density and water content at a frequency of at least one test for every 2,500 square feet of compacted fill in the building areas and 5,000 square feet in pavement areas. One density and water content test should be performed for every 50 linear feet of compacted utility trench backfill. In areas of foundation excavations, the bearing subgrade should be evaluated under the direction of the Geotechnical Engineer. If unanticipated conditions are encountered, the Geotechnical Engineer should prescribe mitigation options. In addition to the documentation of the essential parameters necessary for construction, the continuation of the Geotechnical Engineer into the construction phase of the project provides the continuity to maintain the Geotechnical Engineer’s evaluation of subsurface conditions, including assessing variations and associated design changes. SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS If the site has been prepared in accordance with the requirements noted in Earthwork, the following design parameters are applicable for shallow foundations. Design Parameters – Compressive Loads Description Column Footing Wall Footing Monolithic Slab Foundation 4 Net allowable bearing pressure 1 3,000 psf 2,500 psf 2,500 psf Minimum width 30 inches 18 inches 12 inches Minimum embedment below finished grade 2 18 inches 18 inches 12 inches Compaction requirements 95 percent of the materials maximum Modified Proctor dry density for a depth of 12 inches below footing. 494 Geotechnical Engineering Report Chase Bank-Tuskawilla Road ■ Oviedo, Seminole County, Florida October 30, 2018 ■ Terracon Project No. H1185164 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 11 Description Column Footing Wall Footing Monolithic Slab Foundation 4 Minimum Testing Frequency One field density test per footing for a minimum depth of 1 foot below the footing subgrade. One field density test per 50 linear feet for a minimum depth of 1 foot below the footing subgrade. One field density test per 50 linear feet for a minimum depth of 1 foot below the footing subgrade. Approximate total settlement 3 <1 inch <1 inch <1 inch Estimated differential settlement 3 <¾ inch between columns <¾ inch over 40 feet <¾ inch over 40 feet 1.The recommended net allowable bearing pressure is the pressure in excess of the minimum surrounding overburden pressure at the footing base elevation. Assumes any unsuitable fill or soft soils, if encountered, will be undercut and replaced with engineered fill. 2.For erosion protection and to reduce effects of seasonal moisture variations in subgrade soils. 3.The foundation settlement will depend upon the variations within the subsurface soil profile, the structural loading conditions, the embedment depth of the footings, the thickness of compacted fill, and the quality of the earthwork operations. The above settlement estimates are based on the assumed maximum loads in Project Description, loaded to the indicated net allowable bearing pressure, resulting in a footing width of 6½ feet for column footings and 1½ feet for continuous footings. 4.Turned-down portion of slab. For slab requirements see Floor Slabs Foundation Construction Considerations As noted in Earthwork, the footing excavations should be evaluated under the direction of the Geotechnical Engineer. The base of all foundation excavations should be free of water and loose soil, prior to placing concrete. Concrete should be placed soon after excavating to reduce bearing soil disturbance. Care should be taken to prevent wetting or drying of the bearing materials during construction. Excessively wet or dry material or any loose/disturbed material in the bottom of the footing excavations should be removed/reconditioned before foundation concrete is placed. 495 Geotechnical Engineering Report Chase Bank-Tuskawilla Road ■ Oviedo, Seminole County, Florida October 30, 2018 ■ Terracon Project No. H1185164 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 12 If unsuitable bearing soils are encountered at the base of the planned footing excavation, the excavation should be extended deeper to suitable soils, and the footings could bear directly on these soils at the lower level or on lean concrete backfill placed in the excavations. This is illustrated on the sketch above. Over-excavation for structural fill placement below footings should be conducted as shown above. The over-excavation should be backfilled up to the footing base elevation, with Preferred or Common fill placed, as recommended in the Earthwork section. SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS Chapter 1, Part 101.2 of the 2017 Florida Building Code (effective July 2017) states: “Code requirements that address snow loads and earthquake protection are pervasive; they are left in place but shall not be utilized or enforced because Florida has no snow load or earthquake threat.”. Therefore, this report does not further address seismic considerations. Seismic considerations will seldom control the structural design of buildings in Central Florida (as compared to wind loading conditions). If seismic considerations control the structural design, we can provide a proposal to perform additional services to measure shear wave velocity such as MASW (multichannel analysis of surface waves), ReMi testing (refraction microtremor), seismic cone penetrometer (SCPT) testing to see if the site classification improves. FLOOR SLABS Design parameters for floor slabs assume the requirements for Earthwork have been followed. Specific attention should be given to positive drainage away from the structure. 496 Geotechnical Engineering Report Chase Bank-Tuskawilla Road ■ Oviedo, Seminole County, Florida October 30, 2018 ■ Terracon Project No. H1185164 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 13 Floor Slab Design Parameters Item Description Floor Slab Support Free draining granular material meeting the Preferred fill specification.1, 3 Estimated Modulus of Subgrade Reaction 2 100 pounds per square inch per inch (psi/in) for point loads Compaction requirements 95 percent of the material’s maximum Modified Proctor dry density Minimum Testing Frequency One field density test per 2,500 square feet or fraction thereof for a depth of 12 inches.4 1.We recommend subgrades be maintained in a relatively moist condition until floor slabs are constructed. If the subgrade should become desiccated prior to construction of floor slabs, the affected material should be removed or the materials scarified, moistened, and recompacted. Upon completion of grading operations in the building areas, care should be taken to maintain the recommended subgrade moisture content and density prior to construction of the building floor slabs. 2.Modulus of subgrade reaction is an estimated value based upon our experience with the subgrade condition, the requirements noted in Earthwork, and the floor slab support as noted in this table. It is provided for point loads. For large area loads the modulus of subgrade reaction would be lower, a function of the width of the foundation. 3.Free-draining granular material should have 5 percent or less fines (material passing the #200 sieve, Preferred fill). The in place, predominantly sandy soils appear to meet this requirement. 4.Density should be re-checked after utility construction. The use of a vapor retarder should be considered beneath concrete slabs-on-grade that will be covered with wood, tile, carpet or other moisture sensitive or impervious coverings, or when the slab will support equipment sensitive to moisture. When conditions warrant the use of a vapor retarder, the slab designer and slab contractor should refer to ACI and Florida Building Code (FBC) regarding moisture for procedures and cautions regarding the use and placement of a vapor retarder. We note that FBC requires a minimum of 6-mil polyethylene, which is typically used in Florida. However, local requirements that might affect what moisture barrier may use should also be consulted. Saw-cut control joints should be placed in the slab to help control the location and extent of cracking. For additional recommendations refer to the ACI Design Manual. Floor Slab Construction Considerations On most project sites, the site grading is generally accomplished early in the construction phase. We recommend the area underlying the floor slab be rough graded and then thoroughly proofrolled prior to final grading. However, as construction proceeds, the subgrade may be disturbed due to utility excavations, construction traffic, desiccation, rainfall, etc. As a result, the floor slab subgrade may not be suitable for placement of concrete and corrective action will be required. 497 Geotechnical Engineering Report Chase Bank-Tuskawilla Road ■ Oviedo, Seminole County, Florida October 30, 2018 ■ Terracon Project No. H1185164 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 14 Particular attention should be paid to high traffic areas that were rutted and disturbed earlier and to areas where backfilled trenches are located. Areas where unsuitable conditions are located should be repaired by removing and replacing the affected material with properly compacted fill. All floor slab subgrade areas should be moisture conditioned and properly compacted to the recommendations in this report immediately prior to placement of concrete. PAVEMENTS General Pavement Comments Pavement designs are provided for the traffic conditions and pavement life conditions as noted in Project Description and in the following sections of this report. A critical aspect of pavement performance is site preparation. Pavement designs, noted in this section, must be applied to the site, which has been prepared as recommended in the Site Preparation section. Subgrade Preparation Site grading is typically accomplished relatively early in the construction phase. Fills are placed and compacted in a uniform manner. However, as construction proceeds, excavations are made into these areas, rainfall and surface water saturates some areas, heavy traffic from concrete trucks and other delivery vehicles disturbs the subgrade and many surface irregularities are filled in with loose soils to temporarily improve ride comfort. As a result, the pavement subgrades, initially prepared early in the project, should be carefully evaluated as the time for pavement construction approaches. We recommend the moisture content and density of the top 12 inches of the subgrade be evaluated and the pavement subgrades be proofrolled and tested within two days prior to commencement of actual paving operations. Compaction tests should be performed at a frequency of 1 test per 10,000 square feet or fraction thereof. Areas not in compliance with the required ranges of moisture or density should be moisture conditioned and recompacted. Particular attention should be paid to high traffic areas that were rutted and disturbed earlier and to areas where backfilled trenches are located. Areas where unsuitable conditions are found should be repaired by removing and replacing the materials with properly compacted fills. After proofrolling and repairing deep subgrade deficiencies, the entire subgrade should be scarified and prepared as recommended in the Earthwork section this GeoReport to provide a uniform subgrade for pavement construction. Areas that appear severely desiccated following site stripping may require further undercutting and moisture conditioning. If a significant precipitation event occurs after the evaluation or if the surface becomes disturbed, the subgrade should be reviewed by qualified personnel immediately prior to paving. The subgrade should be in its finished form at the time of the final review. 498 Geotechnical Engineering Report Chase Bank-Tuskawilla Road ■ Oviedo, Seminole County, Florida October 30, 2018 ■ Terracon Project No. H1185164 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 15 Design Considerations Terracon anticipates that traffic loads will be produced primarily by automobile traffic and occasional delivery and trash removal trucks. The thickness of pavements subjected to heavy truck traffic should be determined using expected traffic volumes, vehicle types, and vehicle loads and should be in accordance with local, city or county ordinances. Pavement thickness can be determined using AASHTO, Asphalt Institute, PCA, and/or other methods if specific wheel loads, axle configurations, frequencies, and desired pavement life are provided. Terracon can provide thickness recommendations for pavements subjected to loads other than personal vehicle and occasional delivery and trash removal truck traffic if this information is provided. However, absent that data, we recommend the following minimum typical sections. Estimates of Minimum Pavement Section Thicknesses The following table provides options for AC and PCC Sections: Typical Pavement Section (inches) Traffic Area Alternative Asphalt Concrete Surface Course Limerock, Soil-Cement or Crushed Concrete Base Course Stabilized Subbase Course2,3,4 Portland Cement Concrete Free Draining Subgrade Car Parking PCC ----5.0 18.0 AC 1.5 6.0 12.0 ---- Truck and Drive Areas PCC ----6.0 18.0 AC 2.5 8.0 12.0 ---- Trash Container Pad 1 PCC ----6.0 18.0 1. The trash container pad should be large enough to support the container and the tipping axle of the collection truck. 2.Often referred to as Stabilized Subgrade. 3.Use coarse granular materials such as recycled crushed concrete, shell, or gravel when seasonal high groundwater is within 4 feet of the profile grade. Clay stabilization is acceptable with deeper seasonal high groundwater. 4.Some municipalities do not require stabilized subbase beneath soil-cement base. 499 Geotechnical Engineering Report Chase Bank-Tuskawilla Road ■ Oviedo, Seminole County, Florida October 30, 2018 ■ Terracon Project No. H1185164 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 16 Asphalt Concrete Design Recommendations Pavement The following items are applicable to asphalt concrete pavement sections. ■Terracon recommends a minimum separation of 18 inches for this purpose between the bottom of the base course and the seasonal high groundwater table. Based on our estimate of the seasonal high groundwater conditions and our site grading assumptions, this separation should be achieved. ■Natural or fill subgrade soils to a depth of 18 inches below the base should be clean, free draining sands with a fines content passing a No. 200 sieve of 5 percent or less (Preferred fill). ■Stabilized subgrade soils (also identified as stabilized subbase) should be stabilized to a minimum Limerock Bearing Ratio (LBR; Florida Method of Test Designation FM 5-515) value of 40 if they do not already meet this criterion, or modified/replaced with new compacted fill that meets the minimum LBR value. Although LBR testing has not been performed, our experience with similar soils indicates that the near surficial sands encountered in the soil borings are unlikely to meet this requirement. ■The stabilized subgrade course should be compacted to at least 98 percent of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density (AASHTO T-180 or ASTM D-1557). Any underlying, newly- placed subgrade fill need only be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density. Compaction tests should be performed at a frequency of 1 test per 10,000 square feet or fraction thereof. ■Limerock base courses from an approved FDOT source should have a minimum LBR value of 100, and be compacted to a minimum of 98 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by the Modified Proctor test. Limerock should be placed in uniform lifts not to exceed 6 inches loose thickness. Recycled limerock is not a suitable substitute for virgin limerock for base courses but may be used as a granular stabilizing admixture. ■Soil cement base courses typically experience shrinkage cracking due to hydration curing of the cement. This shrinkage cracking typically propagates through the overlying asphalt course and reflects in the pavement surface. This reflective cracking is not necessarily indicative of a pavement structural failure, though it is sometimes considered to be aesthetically undesirable. ■Soil cement bases should have 7-day design strength of 300 psi. Soil cement base should be compacted to a minimum of 98 percent of the material’s maximum dry density as determined by the Standard Proctor Test for Soil Cement (AASHTO T-134). Higher design strengths may result in increased cracking. ■Crushed (recycled) concrete base should meet the current FDOT specification 911 for recycled materials. ■Asphalt should be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the design mix density. Asphalt surface courses should be Type SP, Type S, or other suitable mix design according to FDOT and local requirements. 500 Geotechnical Engineering Report Chase Bank-Tuskawilla Road ■ Oviedo, Seminole County, Florida October 30, 2018 ■ Terracon Project No. H1185164 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 17 ■To verify thicknesses, after placement and compaction of the pavement courses, core the wearing surface to evaluate material thickness and composition at a minimum frequency of 5,000 square feet or two locations per day’s production. ■Underdrains or strip drains should be considered along all landscaped areas in, or adjacent to pavements to reduce moisture migration to subgrade soils. Underdrains will also be required below pavement if the separation between the bottom of the base course and the seasonal high groundwater table is less than 1 foot. ■All curbing should be full depth. Use of extruded curb sections which lie on top of asphalt surface courses can allow migration of water between the surface and base courses, leading to rippling and pavement deterioration. Portland Cement Concrete Design Recommendations The following items are applicable to rigid concrete pavement sections. ■At least 18 inches of free-draining material should be included directly beneath rigid concrete pavement. Fill meeting the requirements for Preferred fill presented in Earthwork Section of this report may be considered free-draining for this purpose. Limerock should not be considered free draining for this purpose. ■The PCC should be a minimum of 4,000 psi at 28 days. PCC pavements are recommended for trash container pads and in any other areas subjected to heavy wheel loads and/or turning traffic. ■The upper 1 foot of rigid pavement subgrade soils should be compacted to at least 98 percent of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density (AASHTO T-180 or ASTM D-1557). Compaction tests should be performed at a frequency of 1 test per 10,000 square feet or fraction thereof. ■Rigid PCC pavements will perform better than ACC in areas where short-radii turning and braking are expected (i.e. entrance/exit aprons) due to better resistance to rutting and shoving. In addition, PCC pavement will perform better in areas subject to large or sustained loads. An adequate number of longitudinal and transverse control joints should be placed in the rigid pavement in accordance with ACI and/or AASHTO requirements. Expansion (isolation) joints must be full depth and should only be used to isolate fixed objects abutting or within the paved area. ■Adequate separation should be provided between the bottom of the concrete and the seasonal high groundwater table. Terracon recommends that in no case should less than 18 inches of separation be provided. Based on the encountered conditions and anticipated development, we anticipate this requirement can be readily met ■Sawcut patterns should generally be square or rectangular but nearly square, and extend to a depth equal to a quarter of the slab thickness. If the bottom of the concrete pavement is separated from the seasonal high groundwater table by at least 1 foot, filter fabric will not be necessary beneath the expansion joints. 501 Geotechnical Engineering Report Chase Bank-Tuskawilla Road ■ Oviedo, Seminole County, Florida October 30, 2018 ■ Terracon Project No. H1185164 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 18 Pavement Drainage Pavements should be sloped to provide rapid drainage of surface water. Water allowed to pond on or adjacent to the pavements could saturate the subgrade and contribute to premature pavement deterioration. In addition, the pavement subgrade should be graded to provide positive drainage within the granular base section. The subgrade and the pavement surface should have a minimum ¼ inch per foot (2 percent) slope to promote drainage. Appropriate sub-drainage or connection to a suitable daylight outlet should be provided to remove water from the base layer. Pavement Maintenance The pavement sections provided in this report represent minimum recommended thicknesses and, as such, periodic maintenance should be anticipated. Therefore, preventive maintenance should be planned and provided for through an on-going pavement management program. Maintenance activities are intended to slow the rate of pavement deterioration, and to preserve the pavement investment. Maintenance consists of both localized maintenance (e.g., crack and joint sealing and patching) and global maintenance (e.g., surface sealing). Preventive maintenance is usually the first priority when implementing a pavement maintenance program. Additional engineering observation is recommended to determine the type and extent of a cost-effective program. Even with periodic maintenance, some movements and related cracking may still occur and repairs may be required. GENERAL COMMENTS As the project progresses, we address assumptions by incorporating information provided by the design team, if any. Revised project information that reflects actual conditions important to our services is reflected in the final report. The design team should collaborate with Terracon to confirm these assumptions and to prepare the final design plans and specifications. This facilitates the incorporation of our opinions related to implementation of our geotechnical recommendations. Any information conveyed prior to the final report is for informational purposes only and should not be considered or used for decision-making purposes. Our analysis and opinions are based upon our understanding of the project, the geotechnical conditions in the area, and the data obtained from our site exploration. Natural variations will occur between exploration point locations or due to the modifying effects of construction or weather. The nature and extent of such variations may not become evident until during or after construction. Terracon should be retained as the Geotechnical Engineer, where noted in the final report, to provide observation and testing services during pertinent construction phases. If variations appear, we can provide further evaluation and supplemental recommendations. If variations are noted in the absence of our observation and testing services on-site, we should be immediately notified so that we can provide evaluation and supplemental recommendations. 502 Geotechnical Engineering Report Chase Bank-Tuskawilla Road ■ Oviedo, Seminole County, Florida October 30, 2018 ■ Terracon Project No. H1185164 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 19 Our scope of services does not include either specifically or by implication any environmental or biological (e.g., mold, fungi, bacteria) assessment of the site or identification or prevention of pollutants, hazardous materials or conditions. If the owner is concerned about the potential for such contamination or pollution, other studies should be undertaken. Our services and any correspondence or collaboration through this system are intended for the sole benefit and exclusive use of our client for specific application to the project discussed and are accomplished in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices with no third party beneficiaries intended. Any third party access to services or correspondence is solely for information purposes to support the services provided by Terracon to our client. Reliance upon the services and any work product is limited to our client, and is not intended for third parties. Any use or reliance of the provided information by third parties is done solely at their own risk. No warranties, either express or implied, are intended or made. Site characteristics as provided are for design purposes and not to estimate excavation cost. Any use of our report in that regard is done at the sole risk of the excavating cost estimator as there may be variations on the site that are not apparent in the data that could significantly impact excavation cost. Any parties charged with estimating excavation costs should seek their own site characterization for specific purposes to obtain the specific level of detail necessary for costing. Site safety, and cost estimating including, excavation support, and dewatering requirements/design are the responsibility of others. If changes in the nature, design, or location of the project are planned, our conclusions and recommendations shall not be considered valid unless we review the changes and either verify or modify our conclusions in writing. 503 ATTACH MENTS ATTACHMENTS 504 Geotechnical Engineering Report Chase Bank-Tuskawilla Road ■ Oviedo, Seminole County, Florida October 30, 2018 ■ Terracon Project No. H1185164 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable EXPLORATION AND TESTING PROCEDURES Field Exploration Number of Borings Boring Depth (feet)Planned Location 2 15 Buildings 1 20 Canopy 2 10 Pavement Boring Layout and Elevations: Terracon personnel provided the boring layout. Coordinates were obtained with a handheld GPS unit (estimated horizontal accuracy of about ±20 feet). If elevations and a more precise boring layout are desired, we recommend borings be surveyed following completion of fieldwork. Subsurface Exploration Procedures: We advanced the borings with a mini rubber track-mounted rotary drill rig using rotary wash technique. Five samples are obtained in the upper 10 feet of each boring and at intervals of 5 feet on center thereafter. The number of blows required to advance the sampling spoon the last 12 inches of an 18-inch penetration or the middle twelve inches of a 24- inch penetration was recorded as the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) resistance value. The SPT resistance values, also referred to as N-values, are indicated on the boring logs at the test depths. For safety purposes, all borings were backfilled with site soil and/or bentonite hole plug after their completion. The sampling depths, penetration distances, and other sampling information were recorded on the field boring logs. The samples were placed in appropriate containers and taken to our soil laboratory for testing and classification by a geotechnical engineer. Our exploration team prepared field boring logs as part of the drilling operations. These field logs include visual classifications of the materials encountered during drilling and our interpretation of the subsurface conditions between samples. Final boring logs were prepared from the field logs. The final boring logs represent the geotechnical engineer's interpretation of the field logs and include modifications based on observations and tests of the samples in our laboratory. Laboratory Testing The project engineer reviewed the field data. No mechanical testing was assigned. Procedural standards noted below were for reference to methodology in general. In some cases, variations to methods were applied because of local practice or professional judgment. Standards noted below include reference to other, related standards. Such references are not necessarily applicable to describe the specific test performed. 505 Geotechnical Engineering Report Chase Bank-Tuskawilla Road ■ Oviedo, Seminole County, Florida October 30, 2018 ■ Terracon Project No. H1185164 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable ■ASTM D2488 Standard Practice for Description and Identification of Soils (Visual-Manual Procedure) 506 SITE LOCA TION AND EXPLORATION PLANS SITE LOCATION AND EXPLORATION PLANS Contents: Site Location Plan (Topographic Vicinity Map, Soils Map) Exploration Plan (Location Plan) Note: All attachments are one page unless noted above. 507 Drawn By: Checked By: Approved By: Project Mngr: File No. Date: Scale: Project No.EXHIBITTOPOGRAPHIC VICINITY MAPTUSKAWILLA ROAD7.5 MINUTE SERIES (QUADRANGLE) ISSUED: 1994 CASSELBERRY, FLORIDA N EAM AS EAM BHW H1185164 AS SHOWN H1185164 10-15-18 CHASE BANK - TUSKAWILLA ROAD NE CORNER OF SR 434 AND TUSKAWILLA ROAD GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT WINTER SPRINGS, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA Consulting Engineers and Scientists 1675 LEE ROAD WINTER PARK, FLORIDA 32789 FAX. (407) 740-6112PH. (407) 740-6110 5000450040003000250035002000150050001000500 FEET SCALE 1"=1000' SUBJECT SITESTATE RO AD 4 3 4 LAKE JESSUP 508 Drawn By: Checked By: Approved By: Project Mngr: File No. Date: Scale: Project No.EXHIBITSOILS MAP N EAM AS EAM BHW H1185164 AS SHOWN H1185164 10-15-18 CHASE BANK - TUSKAWILLA ROAD NE CORNER OF SR 434 AND TUSKAWILLA ROAD GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT WINTER SPRINGS, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA Consulting Engineers and Scientists 1675 LEE ROAD WINTER PARK, FLORIDA 32789 FAX. (407) 740-6112PH. (407) 740-6110 5000450040003000250035002000150050001000500 FEET SCALE 1"=1000' SOIL LEGEND TAVARES-MILLHOPPER COMPLEX, 0 TO 5 PERCENT SLOPES31 U.S.D.A. SOIL SURVEY FOR SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDATUSKAWILLA ROADSUBJECT SITESTATE RO AD 4 3 4 LAKE JESSUP 509 Drawn By: Checked By: Approved By: Project Mngr: File No. Date: Scale: Project No.EXHIBITLOCATION PLANEAM AS EAM BHW H1185164 AS SHOWN H1185164 10-15-18 CHASE BANK - TUSKAWILLA ROAD NE CORNER OF SR 434 AND TUSKAWILLA ROAD GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT WINTER SPRINGS, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA Consulting Engineers and Scientists 1675 LEE ROAD WINTER PARK, FLORIDA 32789 FAX. (407) 740-6112PH. (407) 740-6110 N LEGEND APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF STANDARD PENETRATION TEST BORING B-4 B-3 B-2B-1 B-5S T A T E RO A D 4 3 4 510 EXPLORATION RESULTS EXPLORATION RESULTS Contents: GeoModel SPT Boring Logs (B-1 through B-5) Note: All attachments are one page unless noted above. 511 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 This is not a cross section. This is intended to display the Geotechnical Model only. See individual logs for more detailed conditions.DEPTHBELOWGRADE(Feet)10/23/2018 Terracon Project No. H1185164 Chase Bank Tuscawilla Oviedo, Seminole County, Florida First Water Observation Sand with silt to sand Clayey sand to sand with silt and some cementation(hardpan) Sand with silt LEGEND Poorly-graded Sand withSilt Poorly-graded Sand Clayey Sand Layering shown on this figure has been developed by thegeotechnical engineer for purposes of modeling the subsurfaceconditions as required for the subsequent geotechnical engineeringfor this project.Numbers adjacent to soil column indicate depth below ground surface. NOTES: GEOMODEL Groundwater levels are temporal. The levels shown are representative of the dateand time of our exploration. Significant changes are possible over time.Water levels shown are as measured during and/or after drilling. In some cases,boring advancement methods mask the presence/absence of groundwater. See individual logs for details. Model Layer General DescriptionLayer Name 1 2 3 Upper sand with silt Hydraulically restrictive Lower sand with silt 1 2 3 4.5 6.5 13.5 15 B-1 1 2 5 6.5 15 B-2 1 2 3 5 8.5 13.5 20 B-3 15 10 B-4 15 10 B-5 512 7-7-9-11 N=16 8-6-8-8N=14 9-11-14-12 N=25 10-10-11-11N=21 8-7-6-6 N=13 8-7-7N=14 SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), fine grained, dark gray and light gray, medium dense to dense grayish brown reddish brown SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), fine grained, reddish brown, medium dense, with some cementation (hardpan) SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), fine grained, dark brown, medium dense Boring Terminated at 15 Feet 6.5 13.5 15.0 Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.THISBORINGLOGISNOTVALIDIFSEPARATEDFROMORIGINALREPORT.GEOSMARTLOG-NOWELLH1185164CHASEBANKTUSCAWILLA.GPJTERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT10/24/18WATERLEVELOBSERVATIONSDEPTH(Ft.)5 10 15 SAMPLETYPEFIELDTESTRESULTSLOCATION Latitude: 28.6965° Longitude: -81.2616° SeeExploration Plan GRAPHICLOGMODELLAYERDEPTH Page 1 of 1 Advancement Method:mud rotary Abandonment Method: 1675 Lee RdWinter Park, FL Notes: Project No.: H1185164 Drill Rig: BR2500 BORING LOG NO. B-1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.CLIENT:Orlando, Florida Driller: Mark Boring Completed: 10-18-2018 PROJECT: Chase Bank Tuskawilla Elevations not obtained See Exploration and Testing Procedures for adescription of field and laboratory procedures usedand additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation ofsymbols and abbreviations. State Road 434 at Tuskawilla Road Oviedo, Seminole County, Florida SITE: Boring Started: 10-18-2018Groundwater encountered at 4.5 feet WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 1 2 3 513 3-4-4-4 N=8 3-4-7-5N=11 3-4-4-4 N=8 6-6-7-6N=13 5-6-5-5 N=11 3-5-6N=11 SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), fine grained, grayish brown to reddish brown, medium dense SAND (SP), fine grained, light grayish brown, medium dense SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), fine grained, dark brown, medium dense CLAYEY SAND (SC), light gray, medium dense light grayish brown Boring Terminated at 15 Feet 3.0 5.0 6.5 15.0 Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.THISBORINGLOGISNOTVALIDIFSEPARATEDFROMORIGINALREPORT.GEOSMARTLOG-NOWELLH1185164CHASEBANKTUSCAWILLA.GPJTERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT10/24/18WATERLEVELOBSERVATIONSDEPTH(Ft.)5 10 15 SAMPLETYPEFIELDTESTRESULTSLOCATION Latitude: 28.6965° Longitude: -81.2613° SeeExploration Plan GRAPHICLOGMODELLAYERDEPTH Page 1 of 1 Advancement Method:mud rotary Abandonment Method: 1675 Lee RdWinter Park, FL Notes: Project No.: H1185164 Drill Rig: BR2500 BORING LOG NO. B-2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.CLIENT:Orlando, Florida Driller: Mark Boring Completed: 10-18-2018 PROJECT: Chase Bank Tuskawilla Elevations not obtained See Exploration and Testing Procedures for adescription of field and laboratory procedures usedand additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation ofsymbols and abbreviations. State Road 434 at Tuskawilla Road Oviedo, Seminole County, Florida SITE: Boring Started: 10-18-2018Groundwater encountered at 5 feet WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 1 2 514 4-4-4-4 N=8 5-4-5-3N=9 4-3-5-5 N=8 4-4-6-4N=10 7-8-8-9 N=16 5-5-8N=13 6-4-4 N=8 SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), fine grained, gray to brown, medium dense SAND (SP), fine grained, light grayish brown, medium dense gray SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), fine grained, reddish brown, medium dense CLAYEY SAND (SC), light grayish brown, medium dense SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), fine grained, light gray, medium dense Boring Terminated at 20 Feet 2.5 7.0 8.5 13.5 20.0 Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.THISBORINGLOGISNOTVALIDIFSEPARATEDFROMORIGINALREPORT.GEOSMARTLOG-NOWELLH1185164CHASEBANKTUSCAWILLA.GPJTERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT10/24/18WATERLEVELOBSERVATIONSDEPTH(Ft.)5 10 15 20 SAMPLETYPEFIELDTESTRESULTSLOCATION Latitude: 28.6967° Longitude: -81.2615° SeeExploration Plan GRAPHICLOGMODELLAYERDEPTH Page 1 of 1 Advancement Method:mud rotary Abandonment Method: 1675 Lee RdWinter Park, FL Notes: Project No.: H1185164 Drill Rig: BR2500 BORING LOG NO. B-3 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.CLIENT:Orlando, Florida Driller: Mark Boring Completed: 10-18-2018 PROJECT: Chase Bank Tuskawilla Elevations not obtained See Exploration and Testing Procedures for adescription of field and laboratory procedures usedand additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation ofsymbols and abbreviations. State Road 434 at Tuskawilla Road Oviedo, Seminole County, Florida SITE: Boring Started: 10-18-2018Groundwater encountered at 5 feet WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 1 2 3 515 2-3-2-3 N=5 4-4-4-4N=8 5-6-6-5 N=12 4-4-4-3N=8 3-3-4-6 N=7 SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), fine grained, gray, loose to medium dense light grayish brown dark brown Boring Terminated at 10 Feet 10.0 Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.THISBORINGLOGISNOTVALIDIFSEPARATEDFROMORIGINALREPORT.GEOSMARTLOG-NOWELLH1185164CHASEBANKTUSCAWILLA.GPJTERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT10/24/18WATERLEVELOBSERVATIONSDEPTH(Ft.)5 10 SAMPLETYPEFIELDTESTRESULTSLOCATION Latitude: 28.6967° Longitude: -81.2617° SeeExploration Plan GRAPHICLOGMODELLAYERDEPTH Page 1 of 1 Advancement Method:mud rotary Abandonment Method: 1675 Lee RdWinter Park, FL Notes: Project No.: H1185164 Drill Rig: BR2500 BORING LOG NO. B-4 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.CLIENT:Orlando, Florida Driller: Mark Boring Completed: 10-18-2018 PROJECT: Chase Bank Tuskawilla Elevations not obtained See Exploration and Testing Procedures for adescription of field and laboratory procedures usedand additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation ofsymbols and abbreviations. State Road 434 at Tuskawilla Road Oviedo, Seminole County, Florida SITE: Boring Started: 10-18-2018Groundwater encountered at 5 feet WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 1 516 5-6-6-7 N=12 8-7-9-9N=16 4-3-3-3 N=6 3-4-4-4N=8 2-3-3-3 N=6 SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), fine grained, grayish brown, trace of roots, pine odor SAND (SP), fine grained, light grayish brown grayish brown brown SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), fine grained, dark reddish brown Boring Terminated at 10 Feet 2.5 8.5 10.0 Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.THISBORINGLOGISNOTVALIDIFSEPARATEDFROMORIGINALREPORT.GEOSMARTLOG-NOWELLH1185164CHASEBANKTUSCAWILLA.GPJTERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT10/24/18WATERLEVELOBSERVATIONSDEPTH(Ft.)5 10 SAMPLETYPEFIELDTESTRESULTSLOCATION Latitude: 28.6962° Longitude: -81.2616° SeeExploration Plan GRAPHICLOGMODELLAYERDEPTH Page 1 of 1 Advancement Method:mud rotary Abandonment Method: 1675 Lee RdWinter Park, FL Notes: Project No.: H1185164 Drill Rig: BR2500 BORING LOG NO. B-5 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.CLIENT:Orlando, Florida Driller: Mark Boring Completed: 10-18-2018 PROJECT: Chase Bank Tuskawilla Elevations not obtained See Exploration and Testing Procedures for adescription of field and laboratory procedures usedand additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation ofsymbols and abbreviations. State Road 434 at Tuskawilla Road Oviedo, Seminole County, Florida SITE: Boring Started: 10-18-2018Groundwater encountered at 5 feet WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 1 517 SUPPORTING INFORMA TION SUPPORTING INFORMATION 518 500 to 1,000 2,000 to 4,000 4,000 to 8,000 1,000 to 2,000 less than 500 > 8,000 Unconfined Compressive StrengthQu, (psf) Non-plasticLow MediumHigh DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS Hand Penetrometer Torvane Dynamic Cone Penetrometer Photo-Ionization Detector Organic Vapor AnalyzerSAMPLINGWATER LEVELFIELD TESTS(HP) (T) (DCP) (PID) (OVA) GENERAL NOTES Over 12 in. (300 mm) 12 in. to 3 in. (300mm to 75mm)3 in. to #4 sieve (75mm to 4.75 mm)#4 to #200 sieve (4.75mm to 0.075mm Passing #200 sieve (0.075mm) Particle Size < 55 - 12> 12 Percent ofDry WeightDescriptive Term(s)of other constituents RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF FINES 01 - 10 11 - 30> 30 Plasticity Index Soil classification is based on the Unified Soil Classification System. Coarse Grained Soils have more than 50% of their dryweight retained on a #200 sieve; their principal descriptors are: boulders, cobbles, gravel or sand. Fine Grained Soils haveless than 50% of their dry weight retained on a #200 sieve; they are principally described as clays if they are plastic, and silts if they are slightly plastic or non-plastic. Major constituents may be added as modifiers and minor constituents may be added according to the relative proportions based on grain size. In addition to gradation, coarse-grained soils are definedon the basis of their in-place relative density and fine-grained soils on the basis of their consistency. LOCATION AND ELEVATION NOTES Percent ofDry Weight Major Component of Sample TraceWithModifier RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF SAND AND GRAVEL GRAIN SIZE TERMINOLOGY Trace WithModifier DESCRIPTIVE SOIL CLASSIFICATION Boulders CobblesGravelSand Silt or Clay Descriptive Term(s) of other constituents < 15 15 - 29> 30 Term PLASTICITY DESCRIPTION Water levels indicated on the soil boring logs are the levels measured in theborehole at the times indicated. Groundwater level variations will occur over time. In low permeability soils,accurate determination of groundwater levels is not possible with short term water level observations. Water Level After a Specified Period of Time Water Level After aSpecified Period of Time Water InitiallyEncountered Auger Cuttings Rock Core Grab Sample No Recovery Shelby Tube Standard Penetration Test Unless otherwise noted, Latitude and Longitude are approximately determined using a hand-held GPS device. The accuracyof such devices is variable. Surface elevation data annotated with +/- indicates that no actual topographical survey was conducted to confirm the surface elevation. Instead, the surface elevation was approximately determined from topographic maps of the area. Hard Very Stiff Stiff Medium Stiff Very Soft Automatic Hammer SPT N-Value(Blows/Ft.) < 3 < 1 1 - 3 3 - 6Medium Dense SoftLoose Very Dense Dense Very Loose Automatic HammerSPT N-Value(Blows/Ft.) 3 - 8 8 - 24 24 - 40 > 40 6 - 12 12 - 24 > 24STRENGTH TERMSDescriptive Term(Consistency)Descriptive Term(Density) CONSISTENCY OF FINE-GRAINED SOILS (50% or more passing the No. 200 sieve.)Consistency determined by laboratory shear strength testing, fieldvisual-manual procedures or standard penetration resistance(More than 50% retained on No. 200 sieve.)Density determined by Standard Penetration Resistance RELATIVE DENSITY OF COARSE-GRAINED SOILS 519 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM Chase Bank-Tuskawilla Road ■ Oviedo, Seminole County, Florida October 30, 2018 ■ Terracon Project No. H1185164 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and Group Names Using Laboratory Tests A Soil Classification Group Symbol Group Name B Coarse-Grained Soils: More than 50% retained on No. 200 sieve Gravels: More than 50% of coarse fraction retained on No. 4 sieve Clean Gravels: Less than 5% finesC Cu ‡ 4 and 1 £ Cc £ 3 E GW Well-graded gravel F Cu < 4 and/or 1 > Cc > 3 E GP Poorly graded gravel F Gravels with Fines: More than 12% fines C Fines classify as ML or MH GM Silty gravel F, G, H Fines classify as CL or CH GC Clayey gravelF, G, H Sands: 50% or more of coarse fraction passes No. 4 sieve Clean Sands: Less than 5% finesD Cu ‡ 6 and 1 £ Cc £ 3E SW Well-graded sandI Cu < 6 and/or 1 > Cc > 3 E SP Poorly graded sandI Sands with Fines: More than 12% fines D Fines classify as ML or MH SM Silty sandG, H, I Fines classify as CL or CH SC Clayey sand G, H, I Fine-Grained Soils: 50% or more passes the No. 200 sieve Silts and Clays: Liquid limit less than 50 Inorganic:PI > 7 and plots on or above “A” lineJ CL Lean clayK, L, M PI < 4 or plots below “A” line J ML Silt K, L, M Organic:Liquid limit - oven dried < 0.75 OL Organic clayK, L, M, N Liquid limit - not dried Organic silt K, L, M, O Silts and Clays: Liquid limit 50 or more Inorganic:PI plots on or above “A” line CH Fat clayK, L, M PI plots below “A” line MH Elastic SiltK, L, M Organic:Liquid limit - oven dried < 0.75 OH Organic clayK, L, M, P Liquid limit - not dried Organic silt K, L, M, Q Highly organic soils:Primarily organic matter, dark in color, and organic odor PT Peat A Based on the material passing the 3-inch (75-mm) sieve B If field sample contained cobbles or boulders, or both, add “with cobbles or boulders, or both” to group name. C Gravels with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: GW-GM well-graded gravel with silt, GW-GC well-graded gravel with clay, GP-GM poorly graded gravel with silt, GP-GC poorly graded gravel with clay. D Sands with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: SW-SM well-graded sand with silt, SW-SC well-graded sand with clay, SP-SM poorly graded sand with silt, SP-SC poorly graded sand with clay E Cu = D60/D10 Cc = 6010 2 30 DxD )(D F If soil contains ‡ 15% sand, add “with sand” to group name. G If fines classify as CL-ML, use dual symbol GC-GM, or SC-SM. HIf fines are organic, add “with organic fines” to group name. I If soil contains ‡ 15% gravel, add “with gravel” to group name. J If Atterberg limits plot in shaded area, soil is a CL-ML, silty clay. KIf soil contains 15 to 29% plus No. 200, add “with sand” or “with gravel,” whichever is predominant. L If soil contains ‡ 30% plus No. 200 predominantly sand, add “sandy” to group name. MIf soil contains ‡ 30% plus No. 200, predominantly gravel, add “gravelly” to group name. NPI ‡ 4 and plots on or above “A” line. OPI < 4 or plots below “A” line. P PI plots on or above “A” line. QPI plots below “A” line. 520 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS WINTER SPRINGS TOWN CENTER COMMERCIAL OUTPARCELS WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA Prepared for: NV5, INC. 201 South Bumby Avenue Orlando, Florida 32803 Prepared by: Traffic Planning and Design, Inc. 535 Versailles Drive Maitland, Florida 32751 407-628-9955 Revised March 2019 TPD № 4887 521 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that I am a Professional Engineer properly registered in the State of Florida practicing with Traffic Planning & Design, Inc., a corporation authorized to operate as an engineering business, EB-3702, by the State of Florida Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Professional Engineers, and that I have prepared or approved the evaluations, findings, opinions, conclusions, or technical advice attached hereto for: PROJECT: Winter Springs Town Center Commercial Outparcels LOCATION: Winter Springs, Florida CLIENT: NV5, INC. I hereby acknowledge that the procedures and references used to develop the results contained in these computations are standard to the professional practice of Transportation Engineering as applied through professional judgment and experience. NAME: Turgut Dervish, P.E. P.E. No.: 20400 DATE: March 28, 2019 SIGNATURE: 522 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 EXISTING ROADWAY ANALYSIS .............................................................................................. 4 Roadway Segment Analysis Intersection Analysis PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND TRIP GENERATION .......................................................... 8 Trip Generation Trip Distribution/Trip Assignment PROJECTED TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ...................................................................................... 12 Roadway Segment Analysis Intersection Analysis Turn Lane Analysis STUDY CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................ 19 APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................. 21 A City of Winter Springs Standard Scope of Work for a Traffic Study B Intersection Counts and Signal Timing Data C Synchro Capacity Analysis Worksheets Existing Conditions D Model Distribution Plot E Trends Analysis Charts F Synchro Capacity Analysis Worksheets Projected Conditions 523 TABLE OF CONTENTS, continued LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1 Existing Daily Roadway Capacity Analysis .................................................................... 5 Table 2 Existing A.M./P.M. Peak Hour Roadway Capacity Analysis .......................................... 5 Table 3 Existing Intersection Capacity Analysis ......................................................................... 7 Table 4 Trip Generation Summary .............................................................................................. 8 Table 5 Projected Daily Roadway Capacity Analysis ................................................................ 12 Table 6 Projected A.M. Peak Hour Roadway Capacity Analysis ............................................... 13 Table 7 Projected P.M. Peak Hour Roadway Capacity Analysis ............................................... 13 Table 8 Projected Intersection Capacity Analysis ..................................................................... 17 Table 9 Required Turn Lane Length Calculation ....................................................................... 18 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Project Location Map ..................................................................................................... 2 Figure 2 Proposed Site Plan ........................................................................................................ 3 Figure 3 Existing A.M./P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ............................................................. 6 Figure 4 Project Trip Distribution ............................................................................................... 10 Figure 5 Project Trip Assignment ............................................................................................... 11 Figure 6 Projected A.M. Peak Hour Intersection Volumes ......................................................... 15 Figure 7 Projected P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Volumes ......................................................... 16 524 Winter Springs Town Center Commercial Outparcels Project № 4887 Page 1 INTRODUCTION This traffic analysis was performed to assess the impact of the proposed commercial outparcels of the Winter Springs Town Center. Located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of SR 434 and Michael Blake Boulevard, the proposed development will consist of a drive-in bank and three restaurants, two of which will have drive-through windows. Access to the site will be provided via Michael Blake Boulevard which intersects SR 434 at a full median opening. In addition, a right in/out driveway will be provided on SR 434. Figure 1 depicts the location of the project site and the area roadways. Figure 2 depicts the proposed site plan. At the request of the City, this analysis consists of updating an earlier analysis conducted for Winter Springs Apartments (now known as Catalyst Apartments). That analysis was conducted in accordance with the City’s standard scope of work for a traffic study as included in Appendix A. The analysis considers the project’s impacts on the following roadways and intersections: Roadways SR 434 Central Winds Drive to Tuskawilla Road Tuskawilla Road to Michael Blake Boulevard Michael Blake Boulevard to Tuscora Drive Tuskawilla Road Trotwood Boulevard to SR 434 SR 434 to Blumberg Boulevard Michael Blake Boulevard SR 434 to Tuskawilla Road Intersections SR 434 & Doran Drive SR 434 & Tuskawilla Road SR 434 & Michael Blake Boulevard Data used in this analysis consists of site plan/development information provided by the Project Engineers, daily traffic volume data obtained from the Florida DOT and Seminole County, and A.M./P.M. peak hour traffic counts obtained by Traffic Planning and Design, Inc. 525 TuscoraDrSite LocationWinter Springs Town Center Condominiums5160Project №Figure 1NTSNSITESITE526 Proposed Site PlanNTSNRestaurantWinter Springs Town Center Commercial Outparcels4887Project №Figure 2527 Winter Springs Town Center Commercial Outparcels Project № 4887 Page 4 EXISTING ROADWAY ANALYSIS Capacity analyses were performed for the study roadway segments and intersections for the existing traffic in order to establish their current operating conditions. The roadway segments were analyzed for daily conditions and the intersections for A.M. and P.M. peak hour conditions. Roadway Segment Analysis The study roadway segments were analyzed by comparing their existing traffic volumes with their respective capacities at the adopted LOS standard. For the SR 434 segments, the daily traffic volumes were obtained from the latest Florida Traffic Information 2015 (FTI) DVD and the respective capacities from the 2012 FDOT Quality/Level of Service Handbook. The volume on Tuskawilla Road, from SR 434 to Blumberg Boulevard, and on Michael Blake Boulevard, from SR 434 to Tuskawilla Road, were estimated from the peak hour intersection traffic counts. The A.M./P.M. peak hour volumes along the roadway segments were determined from counts made at the study intersections. Summaries of the daily and A.M./P.M. peak hour roadway capacity analyses are presented in Tables 1 and 2. The existing conditions analysis reveals that the study segments currently operate satisfactorily within their adopted LOS standards. Intersection Analysis A capacity analysis was conducted for each study intersection using Synchro software in accordance with the procedures of the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). The capacity analysis was performed using the existing intersection geometries, A.M./P.M. peak hour traffic volumes and signal timings. The A.M./P.M. peak hour volumes were determined from turning movement counts obtained by TPD and are included in Appendix B along with signal timing sheets provided by Seminole County. The existing intersection volumes are displayed in Figure 3. The intersection capacity analysis results are summarized in Table 3 and the Synchro analysis worksheets are included in Appendix C. 528 Winter Springs Town Center Commercial Outparcels Project № 4887 Page 5 Table 1 Existing Daily Roadway Capacity Analysis Roadway Segment No. of Lanes LOS Standard Daily Capacity (1) Existing Daily Volume (2) LOS SR 434 Central Winds Dr to Tuskawilla Rd 4LD E 39,800 33,000 C Tuskawilla Rd to Michael Blake Blvd 4LD E 39,800 25,500 C Michael Blake Blvd to Tuscora Dr 4LD E 39,800 25,500 C Tuskawilla Rd E. Lake Dr to SR 434 4LD E 35,820 29,000 C SR 434 to Blumberg Blvd 2LU D 13,320 5,344 (3) C Michael Blake Blvd SR 434 to Tuskawilla Rd 2LU D 13,320 1,122 (3) C (1) Based on FDOT's Generalized Service Volume Tables (2) Obtained from Florida Traffic Information DVD (3) Estimated from the intersection counts with the use of K=0.09 Table 2 Existing A.M./P.M. Peak Hour Roadway Capacity Analysis Roadway Segment No. of Lanes Adopted A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour LOS Standard Daily Capacity (1) Volume (2) Peak Dir LOS Volume Peak Dir LOS SR 434 Central Winds Dr to Tuskawilla Rd 4LD E 2,000 1,474 WB C 1,604 EB C Tuskawilla Rd to Michael Blake Blvd 4LD E 2,000 1,148 WB C 1,262 EB C Michael Blake Blvd to Tuscora Dr 4LD E 2,000 1,180 WB C 1,224 EB C Tuskawilla Rd Trotwood Blvd to SR 434 4LD E 1,800 724 NB C 749 SB C SR 434 to Blumberg Blvd 2L D 675 150 NB C 248 SB C Michael Blake Blvd SR 434 to Tuskawilla Rd 2L D 675 72 SB C 80 NB C (1) Based on FDOT's Generalized Service Volume Tables (2) Estimated from the intersection counts 529 Existing A.M./P.M.Peak Hour Traffic VolumesLegend:PM Peak HourAM Peak HourDoran DrSR 434Tuskawilla RdSR 4342 (0)75 (135)62 (113)34 (83)952 (882)149 (145)44 (41)882 (949)438 (469)520 (481)72 (109)132 (112)Michael BlakeBlvd25 (4)47 (14)6 (28)1,123 (1,128)23 (52)1,067 (1,210)00 (00)8 (34)0 (2)9 (8)16 (7)1,415 (1,290)5 (12)7 (11)1,194 (1,390)3 (15)16 (7)0 (0)14 (9)Winter Springs Town Center Commercial Outparcels4887Project №Figure 3NTSN530 Winter Springs Town Center Commercial Outparcels Project № 4887 Page 7 Table 3 Existing Intersection Capacity Analysis Intersection Control Period EB WB NB SB Overall Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS SR 434 & Doran Dr Signal A.M. 2.8 A 6.7 A 48.8 D 46.5 D 5.7 A P.M. 4.6 A 4.8 A 35.7 D 22.3 C 5.1 A SR 434 & Tuskawilla Rd Signal A.M. 44.3 D 47.4 D 49.5 D 85.7 F 48.2 D P.M. 28.4 C 29.6 C 75.3 E 106.8 F 43.7 D SR 434 & Michael Blake Blvd STOP A.M. 0.2 A 0.0 A - - 26.4 D - - P.M. 0.5 A 0.0 A - - 24.4 C - - The results of the intersection capacity analysis indicate that the all study intersections operate at satisfactory overall Levels of Service except for southbound approach at the intersection of SR 434 and Tuskawilla Road which operates at Level of service “F” during the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. This is due to the coordinated signal system which allocates maximum green time to the heavy traffic volumes and reduces the amount of green time for the minor streets resulting in lengthy delays. The volume-to-capacity ratio for this approach is below 1.0, which indicates that the LOS “F” is due to delay and not capacity deficiency. 531 Winter Springs Town Center Commercial Outparcels Project № 4887 Page 8 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND TRIP GENERATION To determine the impact of this development, an analysis of its trip generation characteristics was conducted. This included the determination of the trips to be generated as well as their distribution and assignment to the area roadways. Trip Generation The trip generation of the proposed development was calculated with the use of trip generation rates obtained from the 10th Edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual. Table 4 provides a summary of the trip generation calculation. The proposed development is projected to generate 2,422 new net daily trips, of which 279 will occur in the A.M. peak hour and 186 will occur in the P.M. peak hour. Table 4 Trip Generation Summary ITE Code Land Use Size (KSF) (1) Daily A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Rate Trips Rate Enter Exit Total Rate Enter Exit Total 912 Drive-in Bank (Chase Bank) 3.470 100.03 347 9.5 19 14 33 20.45 36 35 71 937 Coffee Shop w/ Drive Through 2.500 820.38 2,051 88.99 114 109 223 43.38 55 54 109 934 Fast Food w/ Drive Through 2.163 470.95 1,019 40.19 44 43 87 32.67 37 34 71 820 Retail 7.200 139.58 1,005 21.52 96 59 155 10.83 37 41 78 Totals 4,422 273 225 498 165 164 329 Drive-in Bank Pass-by Trips (29% AM/35% PM) 122 6 4 10 13 12 25 Coffee Shop Pass-by Trips (50%) 1,026 57 55 112 28 27 55 Fast Food Pass-by Trips (50%) 510 22 22 44 19 17 36 Retail Pass-by Trips (34%) 342 33 20 53 13 14 27 Total Pass-by Trips 2,000 118 101 219 73 70 143 Net New Project Trips 2,422 155 124 279 92 94 186 (1) KSF = 1,000 square feet 532 Winter Springs Town Center Commercial Outparcels Project № 4887 Page 9 Trip Distribution/Trip Assignment The proposed distribution pattern was estimated using MetroPlan’s year 2020 LRTP of the OUATS model. The model generated distribution was reviewed for reasonableness and slightly modified in consideration of local traffic conditions. The modified distribution is shown in Figure 4 and a model distribution plot is included in Appendix D. With this distribution pattern, the project trips were assigned to the area roadways as shown in Figure 5. 533 Trip DistributionNTS39%SITESITE6%18%37%29%8%57%39%6%Winter Springs Town Center Commercial Outparcels4887Project №Figure 4N534 SITETrip AssignmentNTSN000A.M. Peak Hour Trips(000)P.M. Peak Hour Trips000 Daily TripsLegend:60 ( 3 6) 945 36 (27)45 (27)7(6)9 (6)14522 (17)28 (17)43610 (8)12 (7)19448 ( 3 7)702SITE58 (3 4) 46 (3 5) 896 71 ( 5 4) 88 (5 2) 1,38 1 Winter Springs Town Center Commercial Outparcels4887Project №Figure 560 ( 3 6) 945 48 ( 3 7)7(6)9(6)145535 Winter Springs Town Center Commercial Outparcels Project № 4887 Page 12 PROJECTED TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Projected traffic conditions for the project buildout were analyzed using daily traffic volumes for the roadway segments and A.M./P.M. peak hour traffic volumes for the intersections. The projected traffic volumes used in the analysis consisted of background traffic volumes combined with traffic from Tuskawilla Crossings and Integra Winter Springs developments and the proposed project trips. Background traffic volumes were estimated with the use of a growth factor of 1.04 for a two-year growth and combined with the Catalyst Apartment traffic. The traffic volumes for each of the Tuskawilla Crossings, Integra Winter springs and Catalyst Apartments developments are included in Appendix E. Roadway Segment Analysis A roadway segment analysis was performed for the study roadway segments by comparing the projected traffic volumes of the segments with their respective capacities at the adopted LOS standards. The daily, A.M. and P.M. peak hour analyses are summarized in Tables 5, 6 and 7. The results of the analysis show that the study roadway segments will continue to operate within their adopted capacity in the projected conditions. Table 5 Projected Daily Roadway Capacity Analysis Roadway Segment No. of Lanes Adopted Projected Daily Volume Projected LOS LOS Sta. Daily Capacity Future Vol* Catalyst Apartments Integra Tuskawilla Crossings Project Trips Total SR 434 Central Winds Dr to Tuskawilla Rd 4LD E 39,800 34,320 890 1,809 1,567 945 39,531 D Tuskawilla Rd to Michael Blake Blvd 4LD E 39,800 26,520 1,020 3,214 1,828 1,381 33,963 C Michael Blake Blvd to Tuscora Dr 4LD E 39,800 26,520 390 3,214 1,828 896 32,848 C Tuskawilla Rd Trotwood Blvd to SR 434 4LD E 35,820 30,160 427 605 1,306 436 32,934 C SR 434 to Blumberg Blvd 2LU D 13,320 5,558 148 495 522 0 6,723 D Michael Blake Blvd SR 434 to Tuskawilla Rd 2LU D 13,320 1,167 1,224 220 266 145 3,022 C * Existing Volume X 1.04 536 Winter Springs Town Center Commercial Outparcels Project № 4887 Page 13 Table 6 Projected A.M. Peak Hour Roadway Capacity Analysis Roadway Segment No. of Lanes Adopted Projected A.M. PHPD Volume Projected LOS LOS Sta. Daily Capacity Future Vol* Catalyst Apartments Integra Tuskawilla Crossings Project Trips Total SR 434 Central Winds Dr to Tuskawilla Rd 4LD E 2,000 1,533 55 43 65 48 1,744 C Tuskawilla Rd to Michael Blake Blvd 4LD E 2,000 1,194 63 68 49 71 1,445 C Michael Blake Blvd to Tuscora Dr 4LD E 2,000 1,227 24 68 49 57 1,426 C Tuskawilla Rd Trotwood Blvd to SR 434 4LD E 1,800 753 26 25 50 28 882 C SR 434 to Blumberg Blvd 2L D 675 156 9 2 17 0 184 C Michael Blake Blvd SR 434 to Tuskawilla Rd 2L D 675 75 75 1 4 9 164 C * Existing Volume X 1.04 Table 7 Projected P.M. Peak Hour Roadway Capacity Analysis Roadway Segment No. of Lanes Adopted Projected A.M. PHPD Volume Projected LOS LOS Standard Daily Capacity Future Vol* Catalyst Apartments Integra Tuskawilla Crossings Project Trips Total SR 434 Central Winds Dr to Tuskawilla Rd 4LD E 2,000 1,668 54 60 78 36 1,896 C Tuskawilla Rd to Michael Blake Blvd 4LD E 2,000 1,312 62 92 60 52 1,579 C Michael Blake Blvd to Tuscora Dr 4LD E 2,000 1,273 24 93 72 35 1,497 C Tuskawilla Rd Trotwood Blvd to SR 434 4LD E 1,800 779 26 36 52 17 910 C SR 434 to Blumberg Blvd 2L D 675 258 9 3 13 0 283 C Michael Blake Blvd SR 434 to Tuskawilla Rd 2L D 675 83 74 1 3 6 167 C * Existing Volume X 1.04 537 Winter Springs Town Center Commercial Outparcels Project № 4887 Page 14 Intersection Analysis To assess the projected operating conditions at the study intersections, intersection capacity analyses were conducted using projected traffic volumes. The intersections were analyzed using the Synchro Software in accordance with the procedures of the Highway Capacity 6E Manual. Projected peak hour volumes were similarly calculated by applying a growth factor to existing volumes and adding the Catalyst Apartments, Tuskawilla Crossings, Integra Winter Springs and project trips. Figures 6 and 7 show the projected peak hour intersection turning volumes for the study intersections. The projected Levels of Service are summarized in Table 8. The analysis shows that the study intersections will operate at acceptable overall Levels of Service in the projected conditions except for the southbound approach at the intersection of SR 434 and Tuskawilla Road. Similar to the existing conditions analysis, this approach will operate at LOS “F” due to the coordinated signal timing which favors the heavy traffic volumes on SR 434 reducing the amount of green time on the minor streets. The v/c ratio remains below 1.0 which indicates that the LOS “F” is due to delay, not capacity deficiency. In addition, the minor approaches at the intersection of SR 434 and Michael Blake Boulevard, which will become a four-legged intersection, are projected to operate at LOS “F” due to the addition of traffic from the Integra Winter Springs, Tuskawilla Crossings and the proposed project trips. This intersection be should be considered for signalization with the addition of development trips as documented herein. With signalization, the intersection will operate at satisfactory Levels of Service. Detailed printouts of each intersection capacity analysis are included in Appendix F. 538 Projected A.M. Peak HourTraffic VolumesDoran DrSR 434Tuskawilla RdMichael Blake BlvdSite Access 2(9)150+{2}=152(7)[76]+(82)=158[88]+(117)=20548+{4}=52809171,527+<43>+{65}+(48)=1,683571,255+<52>+{24}+(60)=1,3913170151187+{17}=10465+<2>=6735+<2>=371,037+<43>+{43}+(48)=1,171172+<22>+{4}+(23)=22148928+<52>+{16}+(60)=1,056456+{8}=464541+{22}=56377+{17}=94141+<25>+{11}+(28)=20577+[25]+(36)=138{2}73+<1>+[51]+(46)=1719+<1>+[29]+(29)=681,171+<68>+{37}-[29]+(29)=1,276{12}39+[59]+(88)=1861,110+<80>+{23}-[59]=1,154{4}Site Access 13+[30]+(29)=621,245+<68>+{48}-[30]+(36)=1,36712+[26]+(35)=731,149+<80>+{27}+(88)=1,344Legend:00+<00>+{00}+[00]+(00)=00Total TrafficProject TrafficPass-by TrafficTuskawilla Crossings TrafficIntegra Winter Springs TrafficBackground Traffic(Existing X 1.04 + Catalyst Apt){11}{4}{32}SR 434Winter Springs Town Center Commercial Outparcels4887Project №Figure 6NTSN539 Projected P.M. Peak HourTraffic VolumesDoran DrSR 434Tuskawilla RdMichael Blake BlvdSite Access 2(6)59+{5}=64(6)[53]+(62)=115[55]+(69)=124157+{3}=160352871,371+<73>+{49}+(37)=1,53013111,500+<60>+{78}+(36)=1,674167090145+{13}=158123+<3>=12686+<3>=89941+<73>+{33}+(37)=1,084160+<36>+{13}+(17)=226521,032+<60>+{52}+(36)=1,180488+{26}=514500+{16}=516122+{13}=135134+<29>+{8}+(17)=18831+[18]+(27)=76{5}28+<1>+[35]+(35)=9941+<1>+[18]+(17)=771,185+<113>+{38}-[18]+(17)=1,335{38}116+[37]+(52)=2051,258+<92>+{47}-[37]=1,360{13}Site Access 112+[18]+(17)=471,204+<113>+{46}-[18]+(27)=1,3726+[17]+(27)=501,347+<92>+{60}+(52)=1,551Legend:00+<00>+{00}+[00]+(00)=00{8}{3}{25}SR 434Winter Springs Town Center Commercial Outparcels4887Project №Figure 7NTSNTotal TrafficProject TrafficPass-by TrafficTuskawilla Crossings TrafficIntegra Winter Springs TrafficBackground Traffic(Existing X 1.04 + Catalyst Apt) 540 Winter Springs Town Center Commercial Outparcels Project № 4887 Page 17 Table 8 Projected Intersection Capacity Analysis Intersection Control Period EB WB NB SB Overall Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS SR 434 & Doran Dr Signal A.M. 3.7 A 4.7 A 49.0 D 46.4 D 4.9 A P.M. 5.6 A 4.6 A 35.7 D 22.8 C 5.5 A SR 434 & Tuskawilla Rd Signal A.M. 52.1 D 52.3 D 62.0 E 85.5 F 55.8 E P.M. 42.4 D 52.8 D 79.1 E 93.2 F 56.4 E SR 434 & Michael Blake Blvd STOP A.M. 2.5 A 0.1 A ** F ** F P.M. 2.7 A 0.4 A ** F ** F - - Signal A.M. 36.1 D 51.7 D 13.2 B 36.3 D 42.7 D P.M. 39.2 D 50.5 D 14.1 B 29.9 C 43.5 D Site Access @ SR 434 (right in/out) STOP A.M. - - 0.0 A - - 18.8 C - - P.M. - - 0.0 A - - 17.5 C - - Site Access 2 @ Michael Blake Blvd (full) STOP A.M. 10.6 B - - 6.4 A 0.0 A - - P.M. 9.5 A - - 3.3 A 0.0 A - - ** Excessive Delays 541 Winter Springs Town Center Commercial Outparcels Project № 4887 Page 18 Turn Lane Analysis a) Right Turn Lane: The need for a right turn lane was evaluated at the intersection of SR 434 and Michael Blake Boulevard and at the site access. As per Section 9-206 of the City Code, a right turn deceleration lane should be provided if the projected right turning volume is equal to or greater than 40 vehicles per hour for a four-lane roadway with a posted speed limit greater than 45 mph. The projected volume on SR 434 turning right into Michael Blake Boulevard is 68 vehicles during the A.M. peak hour and 77 during the P.M. peak hour. Therefore, an exclusive right turn lane is required at this location. The recommended length of this right turn lane is recommended to be 350 feet as per the FDOT Index 301 for a design speed of 55 mph. The site access is located west of Michael Blake Boulevard, where the speed limit drops to 45 mph. As per Section 9-206 of the City Code, a right turn deceleration lane should be provided if the projected right turning volume is equal to or greater than 110 vehicles per hour for a four-lane roadway with a posted speed limit 45 mph or less. The projected right turning volume on SR 434 at the site access is 62 vehicles during the A.M. peak hour and 47 during the P.M. peak hour. Therefore, a right turn lane is not needed at this location. b) Left Turn Lane: A left turn lane analysis was conducted to determine the adequacy of the existing left turn lane at the SR 434/Michael Blake Boulevard intersection. This was accomplished utilizing the 95th percentile queue length obtained from the Synchro intersection analysis for the projected conditions and deceleration distance obtained from FDOT’s Index 301. The required turn lane length calculated using the following equation: Left Turn Lane Length (TL) = Deceleration Distance (DD) + Queue Length (QL) Table 9 summarizes the turn lane length available and required at the study intersection. As can be seen, the existing available turn lane at the intersection of SR 434 and Michael Blake Boulevard will be adequate to serve the project trips. Table 9 Required Turn Lane Length Calculation Approach Design Speed (mph) Decel. Distance (ft) Available Length (ft) Peak Hour 95th %ile BOQ (ft) Required TL Length (ft) EBL 50 240 375 A.M. 52.5 292.5 P.M. 68 308 542 Winter Springs Town Center Commercial Outparcels Project № 4887 Page 19 STUDY CONCLUSIONS This traffic analysis was performed to assess the impact of the proposed development of commercial outparcels located in the northwest quadrant of SR 434 and Michael Blake Boulevard in Winter Springs, Florida. The proposed development will consist of a drive-in bank and three restaurants, two of which will have drive-through windows. Access to the site will be provided via Michael Blake Boulevard which intersects SR 434 at a full median opening. In addition, a right in/out driveway will be provided on SR 434. The results of the study as documented herein are summarized below: o The proposed development will generate a total daily traffic volume of 2,422 new net daily trips, of which 279 will occur in the A.M. peak hour and 186 will occur in the P.M. peak hour. o The study roadway segments currently operate at adequate Levels of Service and will continue to operate at satisfactory Levels of Service when project trips are added. o The study roadway intersections currently operate at satisfactory overall Levels of Service except for southbound approach at the intersection of SR 434 and Tuskawilla Road which operates at Level of service “F” during the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. This is due to the coordinated signal system which allocates maximum green time to the heavy traffic volumes and reduces the amount of green time for the minor streets resulting in lengthy delays. The volume-to-capacity ratio for this approach is below 1.0, which indicates that the LOS “F” is due to delay, not capacity deficiency. o The study intersections will continue to operate at acceptable overall Levels of Service in the projected conditions except for the southbound approach at the intersection of SR 434 and Tuskawilla Road. Similar to the existing conditions analysis, this approach will operate at LOS “F” due to the coordinated signal timing which favors the heavy traffic volumes on SR 434 reducing the amount of green time on the minor streets. The v/c ratio remains below 1.0 which indicates that the LOS “F” is due to delay, not capacity deficiency. 543 Winter Springs Town Center Commercial Outparcels Project № 4887 Page 20 In addition, the minor approaches at the intersection of SR 434 and Michael Blake Boulevard, which will become a four-legged intersection, are projected to operate at LOS “F” due to the addition of traffic from the Integra Winter Springs, Tuskawilla Crossings and the proposed project trips. This intersection should be considered for signalization when warranted. o At the intersection of SR 434 and Michael Blake Boulevard, a 350-foot long westbound right turn lane is recommended. The length of the existing eastbound left turn lane on SR 434 is adequate for the projected traffic volumes. 544 APPENDICES 545 APPENDIX A City of Winter Springs Standard Scope of Work for a Traffic Study 546 From: Brian Fields Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 10:39 AM To: 'Anthony Everett' Cc: Randy Stevenson; Bobby Howell; Michael Derbaum Subject: RE: ACOE Permit Compliance Package Anthony, Please find attached our standard scope for a traffic study. For your project, based on an apartment complex with up to 350 units, the study should include the following in addition to the standard scope: Roadway segments to analyze: SR 434 in separate segments from Central Winds Drive to Tuskawilla Road, from Tuskawilla Road to Michael Blake Blvd, and from Michael Blake Boulevard to Tuscora Drive Michael Blake Boulevard Tuskawilla Road from Trotwood to SR 434 and from SR 434 to Blumberg Blvd Intersections to analyze: SR 434 at Central Winds Drive SR 434 at Doran Drive SR 434 at Tuskawilla Road SR 434 at Michael Blake Blvd SR 434 at Tuscora Drive Additional items to analyze: Warrant for right‐turn deceleration land on SR 434 westbound at Michael Blake Boulevard Adequacy of left turn storage on SR 434 eastbound at Michael Blake Boulevard Lane configuration and turn storage on Michael Blake Blvd southbound at SR 434 Feel free to have your traffic engineer contact me with any questions. Brian Fields, P.E. City Engineer City of Winter Springs 407‐327‐7597 (office) 321‐388‐2757 (cell) 547 From: Brian Fields [mailto:bfields@winterspringsfl.org] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 3:43 PM To: Turgut Dervish Subject: Winter Springs Apartments Turgut, Please find the information attached and listed below regarding the Winter Springs Apartments traffic study requirements. Regarding the parking analysis (if this is part of your scope), the following is from the Town Center Code, Section 20‐324: There shall be no minimum parking requirement in the town center. The applicant shall provide a parking analysis justifying the proposed parking solution. The level of detail required for the parking analysis shall be determined in consultation with the DRC early-on in the development process. In general, the parking analysis shall include a detailed analysis and calculation of the normal and peak parking demands for a development. The usage of standard parking generation rates is normally not acceptable for this purpose. The best source of data is field parking counts from similar developments in the area. Factors to consider when calculating the overall parking demand include, but are not limited to: • Size and usage of the development/number of units • Availability and proximity of mass transit • Demographics of the expected user group • Availability and expected use of bicycle and pedestrian facilities • Surrounding land use Factors to consider when determining the number of parking spaces to be provided include, but are not limited to: • Number of parking spaces to be reserved and/or restricted • Availability and proximity of overflow parking areas • Mix of the type of parking spaces available, including private garages, private driveways, public surface parking, public on-street parking, metered parking, etc. • Management strategies for the usage of visitor/overflow parking spaces • Opportunity to share parking with surrounding properties Enclosed garages in individual residential units are often not used to their full parking capacity. In recognition of this, the number of parking spaces considered to be available in enclosed garages shall be calculated at fifty (50) percent of the actual parking capacity. For example, a two-car garage would be considered to have 1.0 parking spaces, and a one-car garage would have 0.5 parking spaces. 548 APPENDIX B Intersection Counts and Signal Timing Data 549 City:Winter SpringsCounty:SeminoleStudy Period:A.M.13% 0% 11%809160%14153%50%0%73%11940%316 0 140% 0% 0% % = Percentage of Trucks / TotalLeft Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right8 0 7 5 1369 16 16 0 14 7 1161 3 26061 0104600000330819 0 8 5 1415 16 16 0 14 7 1194 3 2687toLeft Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right2 1302954703325905774 1603322808221405771 0013945008329507072 0103684802128726753 0523395503027406363 0223142301333816692 0122812802231036133 0412584505336616508:30:00 AM8:45:00 AM7:00:00 AM7:15:00 AM7:30:00 AM7:45:00 AM8:00:00 AM8:15:00 AMPeak Hour07:30 AM to 08:30 AMTotal Vehicle TrafficInterval StartsSouthbound Westbound Northbound EastboundTotalCarsTrucksTotalPeak Hour Factor 0.950 McCleod's Way / Doran Drive Peak Hour TrafficSouthbound Westbound Northbound EastboundTotalSR 434Date:E/W Street Name:N/S Street Name:McCleod's Way / Doran Drive SR 4341‐Oct‐15SR 434McCleod's Way / Doran Drive550 Date:1‐Oct‐15City:Winter SpringsE/W Street Name:SR 434County:SeminoleN/S Street Name:McCleod's Way / Doran DriveStudy Period:A.M.Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right7:00:00 AM2 1 302954703325905777:15:00 AM4 1 603322808221405777:30:00 AM1 0 013945008329507077:45:00 AM2 0 1 0 368 48021 287 26758:00:00 AM3 0 523395503027406368:15:00 AM3 0 223142301333816698:30:00 AM2 0 122812802231036138:45:00 AM3 0 41258450533661650Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right7:00:00 AM2 1 302934703325205687:15:00 AM4 1 503262808220105577:30:00 AM1 0 013845008328706897:45:00 AM2 0 103524802128226548:00:00 AM2 0 423305503026406158:15:00 AM3 0 223032301332816488:30:00 AM2 0 122742802230025958:45:00 AM2 0 41250450533571632Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right7:00:00 AM0 0 002000007097:15:00 AM0 0 10600000130207:30:00 AM0 0 00100000080187:45:00 AM0 0 0 0 16 0000050218:00:00 AM1 0 10900000100218:15:00 AM0 0 001100000100218:30:00 AM0 0 00700000101188:45:00 AM1 0 008000009018Truck TrafficInterval StartsSouthbound Westbound Northbound EastboundTotalCar TrafficInterval StartsSouthbound Westbound Northbound EastboundTotalTotal Vehicle TrafficInterval StartsSouthbound Westbound Northbound EastboundTotal551 City:Winter SpringsCounty:SeminoleStudy Period:P.M.0% 0% 0%34 2 870%12903%120%0%112%13900%157090% 0% 0% % = Percentage of Trucks / TotalLeft Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right8 2 34 12 12487709111365 15 27180 0004200000250678 2 34 12 12907709111390 15 2785toLeft Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right3 0662692203226825630 0682732202132826243 0742797701331936330 0533323301232936814 1843082204436237022 0523342203235837132 11633160001334166894 154257660151562447SR 434Date:E/W Street Name:N/S Street Name:McCleod's Way / Doran Drive SR 43430‐Sep‐15SR 434McCleod's Way / Doran DriveMcCleod's Way / Doran Drive Peak Hour TrafficSouthbound Westbound Northbound EastboundTotalCarsTrucksTotalPeak Hour Factor 0.977Peak Hour04:45 AM to 05:45 AMTotal Vehicle TrafficInterval StartsSouthbound Westbound Northbound EastboundTotal5:30:00 AM5:45:00 AM4:00:00 AM4:15:00 AM4:30:00 AM4:45:00 AM5:00:00 AM5:15:00 AM552 Date:30‐Sep‐15City:Winter SpringsE/W Street Name:SR 434County:SeminoleN/S Street Name:McCleod's Way / Doran DriveStudy Period:P.M.Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right4:00:00 AM3 0 662692203226825634:15:00 AM0 0 682732202132826244:30:00 AM3 0 742797701331936334:45:00 AM0 0 5 3 33233012 329 36815:00:00 AM4 1 843082204436237025:15:00 AM2 0 523342203235837135:30:00 AM2 11633160001334166895:45:00 AM4 1 54257660151562447Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right4:00:00 AM3 0 662421203226525324:15:00 AM0 0 682662202132226114:30:00 AM3 0 642687701331236144:45:00 AM0 0 533123301231536475:00:00 AM4 1 843002204435636885:15:00 AM2 0 523252203235737035:30:00 AM2 11633110001333766805:45:00 AM4 1 54252660151552441Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right4:00:00 AM0 0 00271000030314:15:00 AM0 0 0070000060134:30:00 AM0 0 10110000070194:45:00 AM0 0 0 0 20 00000140345:00:00 AM0 0 0080000060145:15:00 AM0 0 0090000010105:30:00 AM0 0 005000004095:45:00 AM0 0 00500000106Total Vehicle TrafficInterval StartsSouthbound Westbound Northbound EastboundTotalCar TrafficInterval StartsSouthbound Westbound Northbound EastboundTotalTruck TrafficInterval StartsSouthbound Westbound Northbound EastboundTotal553 554 All Vehicles 7:00 to 9:00 15-007.01 Left Through Right Left Through Right 7:00 - 7:15 145 108 26 22 32 0 7:15 - 7:30 83 15 26 35 52 1 7:30 - 7:45 150 17 40 11 26 0 7:45 - 8:00 120 19 45 16 21 0 8:00 - 8:15 120 15 32 19 18 0 8:15 - 8:30 158 18 29 12 11 2 8:30 - 8:45 122 20 26 15 25 0 8:45 - 9:00 116 24 32 18 28 0 1,014 236 256 148 213 3 Left Through Right Left Through Right 7:00 - 7:15 23 136 68 12 171 20 7:15 - 7:30 8 212 88 21 206 6 7:30 - 7:45 10 192 87 24 232 3 7:45 - 8:00 10 213 110 54 258 6 8:00 - 8:15 8 225 87 18 238 13 8:15 - 8:30 11 216 104 32 231 58:30 - 8:45 15 228 137 45 225 10 8:45 - 9:00 5 134 124 32 164 18 90 1,556 805 238 1,725 81 27562 34 Tuskawilla Rd.952 149 SR 434 7:45 - 8:45 44 882 438 520 72 132 Time Period Date Intersection Tuskawilla Rd. January 15, 2015 Roadway Count Summary GMB Engineers & Planners, Inc. SouthboundNorthbound 3,362 WestboundEastbound North / South East / West Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 0.96 Total Pk Hr Voume Time Period & Time Period GMB Project #: County Winter SpringsSeminoleCity SR 434 555 & 7:00 to 9:00 15-007.01 Left Through Right Left Through Right 7:00-7:15 200 0007:15 - 7:30 3 0 0 1 0 07:30 - 7:45 3 0 1 0 1 0 7:45 - 8:00 4 0 1 2 0 0 8:00-8:15 300 000 8:15-8:30 200 000 8:30 - 8:45 4 0 0 0 1 0 8:45 - 9:00 7 2 0 1 0 0 Left Through Right Left Through Right 7:00 - 7:15 0 5 1 0 3 1 7:15 - 7:30 0 8 3 1 4 0 7:30 - 7:45 0 8 5 0 7 0 7:45 - 8:00 0 5 1 0 2 0 8:00 - 8:15 0 6 0 0 6 1 8:15 - 8:30 1 8 1 1 5 0 8:30 - 8:45 1 7 3 1 8 0 8:45 - 9:00 0 9 1 0 2 0 0.0% 1.3% 3.2%2.9% Tuskawilla Rd. 2.2% SR 434 1.3% 7:45 - 8:45 4.5% 2.9% 1.1%2.5% 0.0% 0.8% SR 434 Westbound GMB Project #: Time Period Northbound Southbound Eastbound Roadway Count Summary GMB Engineers & Planners, Inc. Intersection Time Period Date Tuskawilla Rd. January 15, 2015 County Seminole Winter Springs Trucks City North / South East / West Peak Hour Time Period 556 & 7:00 to 9:00 15-007.01 Left Through Right Left Through Right 7:00-7:15 0010 000 7:15-7:30 0011 000 7:30 - 7:45 1 0 28 0 0 0 7:45 - 8:00 0 0 26 0 0 08:00-8:15 0023 0008:15-8:30 0018 0008:30 - 8:45 0 0 19 0 0 0 8:45 - 9:00 0 0 25 0 0 0 Left Through Right Left Through Right 7:00 - 7:15 0 0 41 0 0 4 7:15-7:30 0026 000 7:30 - 7:45 0 0 22 2 0 0 7:45 - 8:00 1 0 36 2 0 0 8:00 - 8:15 0 0 33 0 0 18:15 - 8:30 0 0 52 1 0 18:30 - 8:45 0 0 54 1 0 08:45 - 9:00 0 0 65 1 0 1 000 2 Tuskawilla Rd. 0 SR 434 4 7:45 - 8:45 1 0 175 0 0 86 Roadway Count Summary GMB Engineers & Planners, Inc. Intersection Time Period Date County Seminole Winter SpringsCity Northbound Westbound North / South East / West Peak Hour Time Period Time Period Tuskawilla Rd.SR 434 January 15, 2015 Southbound Eastbound GMB Project #: U-Turn & RTOR 557 All Vehicles 16:00 to 18:00 15-007.01 Left Through Right Left Through Right 16:00 - 16:15 157 31 53 26 37 0 16:15 - 16:30 151 48 28 15 35 1 16:30 - 16:45 125 27 27 31 33 1 16:45 - 17:00 118 26 23 18 36 0 17:00 - 17:15 121 24 31 37 28 0 17:15 - 17:30 122 28 28 25 42 0 17:30 - 17:45 120 31 30 33 29 0 17:45 - 18:00 94 40 31 28 43 0 1,008 255 251 213 283 2 Left Through Right Left Through Right 16:00 - 16:15 11 168 81 27 184 7 16:15 - 16:30 9 167 65 20 176 18 16:30 - 16:45 7 207 73 25 202 16 16:45 - 17:00 18 204 126 42 200 14 17:00 - 17:15 6 205 116 35 205 11 17:15 - 17:30 10 289 119 29 226 2817:30 - 17:45 7 251 108 39 251 30 17:45 - 18:00 7 204 91 38 199 28 75 1,695 779 255 1,643 152 0 135 113 83 Tuskawilla Rd.882 145 SR 434 16:45 - 17:45 41 949 469 481 109 112 Time Period Date Intersection Tuskawilla Rd. January 15, 2015 Roadway Count Summary GMB Engineers & Planners, Inc. SouthboundNorthbound 3,519 WestboundEastbound North / South East / West Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 0.93 Total Pk Hr Voume Time Period & Time Period GMB Project #: County Winter SpringsSeminoleCity SR 434 558 & 16:00 to 18:00 15-007.01 Left Through Right Left Through Right 16:00 - 16:15 7 1 2 0 0 016:15 - 16:30 4 0 0 0 0 016:30 - 16:45 8 0 0 0 1 0 16:45 - 17:00 4 0 0 1 1 0 17:00 - 17:15 4 1 1 1 0 0 17:15 - 17:30 3 0 0 0 0 0 17:30 - 17:45 1 0 0 0 0 0 17:45 - 18:00 1 1 0 0 0 0 Left Through Right Left Through Right 16:00 - 16:15 0 4 0 0 13 0 16:15 - 16:30 0 6 1 0 5 0 16:30 - 16:45 0 9 0 0 27 0 16:45 - 17:00 0 5 1 0 19 0 17:00 - 17:15 1 2 0 2 9 0 17:15 - 17:30 0 5 3 0 3 0 17:30 - 17:45 0 4 1 0 3 0 17:45 - 18:00 0 5 2 0 3 0 0.0% 0.7% 1.8%0.0% Tuskawilla Rd. 3.9% SR 434 1.4% 16:45 - 17:45 2.4% 1.7% 1.1%2.5% 0.9% 0.9% SR 434 Westbound GMB Project #: Time Period Northbound Southbound Eastbound Roadway Count Summary GMB Engineers & Planners, Inc. Intersection Time Period Date Tuskawilla Rd. January 15, 2015 County Seminole Winter Springs Trucks City North / South East / West Peak Hour Time Period 559 & 16:00 to 18:00 15-007.01 Left Through Right Left Through Right 16:00 - 16:15 0 0 37 0 0 0 16:15 - 16:30 0 0 19 0 0 0 16:30 - 16:45 1 0 19 0 0 0 16:45 - 17:00 0 0 13 0 0 017:00 - 17:15 0 0 22 0 0 017:15 - 17:30 0 0 19 0 0 017:30 - 17:45 0 0 23 0 0 0 17:45 - 18:00 1 0 22 0 0 0 Left Through Right Left Through Right 16:00 - 16:15 0 0 0 1 0 0 16:15 - 16:30 0 0 0 2 0 1 16:30 - 16:45 0 0 1 1 0 1 16:45 - 17:00 0 0 0 1 0 1 17:00 - 17:15 0 0 0 3 0 117:15-17:30 000 00017:30-17:45 000 00017:45 - 18:00 0 0 0 1 0 3 000 2 Tuskawilla Rd. 0 SR 434 4 16:45 - 17:45 0 0 00077 Roadway Count Summary GMB Engineers & Planners, Inc. Intersection Time Period Date County Seminole Winter SpringsCity Northbound Westbound North / South East / West Peak Hour Time Period Time Period Tuskawilla Rd.SR 434 January 15, 2015 Southbound Eastbound GMB Project #: U-Turn & RTOR 560 561 All Vehicles 7:00 to 9:00 15-007.01 Left Through Right Left Through Right 7:00-7:15 000 1513 7:15-7:30 000 1102 7:30 - 7:45 0 0 0 13 0 11 7:45 - 8:00 0 0 0 13 0 10 8:00-8:15 000 1002 8:15 - 8:30 0 0 0 13 0 1 8:30-8:45 000 1100 8:45 - 9:00 0 0 0 8 0 3 000 94132 Left Through Right Left Through Right 7:00 - 7:15 20 176 0 0 230 34 7:15 - 7:30 3 277 0 0 250 3 7:30 - 7:45 7 251 0 0 271 2 7:45 - 8:00 8 264 0 0 319 1 8:00 - 8:15 5 275 0 0 283 0 8:15 - 8:30 2 246 0 0 270 48:30 - 8:45 7 265 0 0 270 1 8:45 - 9:00 1 185 0 1 222 0 53 1,939 0 1 2,115 45 25 0 47 6 Michael Blake Blvd 1,123 0 SR 434 7:15 - 8:15 23 1,067 0 000 Time Period Date Intersection Michael Blake Blvd January 15, 2015 Roadway Count Summary GMB Engineers & Planners, Inc. SouthboundNorthbound 2,291 WestboundEastbound North / South East / West Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 0.93 Total Pk Hr Voume Time Period & Time Period GMB Project #: County Winter SpringsSeminoleCity SR 434 562 & 7:00 to 9:00 15-007.01 Left Through Right Left Through Right 7:00-7:15 000 0007:15-7:30 000 0007:30 - 7:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 - 8:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:00-8:15 000 000 8:15-8:30 000 000 8:30 - 8:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:45 - 9:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 Left Through Right Left Through Right 7:00 - 7:15 0 6 0 0 4 0 7:15 - 7:30 0 7 0 0 4 0 7:30 - 7:45 0 5 0 0 5 1 7:45 - 8:00 0 7 0 0 4 0 8:00 - 8:15 0 10 0 0 4 0 8:15 - 8:30 0 6 0 0 1 0 8:30 - 8:45 0 6 0 0 7 0 8:45 - 9:00 0 8 0 1 2 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%16.7% Michael Blake Blvd 1.5% SR 434 0.0% 7:15 - 8:15 0.0% 2.7% 0.0%0.0% 0.0% 0.0% SR 434 Westbound GMB Project #: Time Period Northbound Southbound Eastbound Roadway Count Summary GMB Engineers & Planners, Inc. Intersection Time Period Date Michael Blake Blvd January 15, 2015 County Seminole Winter Springs Trucks City North / South East / West Peak Hour Time Period 563 & 7:00 to 9:00 15-007.01 Left Through Right Left Through Right 7:00-7:15 000 000 7:15-7:30 000 000 7:30-7:45 000 000 7:45-8:00 000 0008:00-8:15 000 0008:15-8:30 000 0008:30-8:45 000 000 8:45-9:00 000 000 Left Through Right Left Through Right 7:00-7:15 300 000 7:15-7:30 100 000 7:30-7:45 200 000 7:45-8:00 100 000 8:00-8:15 300 0008:15-8:30 200 0008:30-8:45 600 0008:45-9:00 000 000 000 0 Michael Blake Blvd 0 SR 434 0 7:15 - 8:15 7 0 0 000 Roadway Count Summary GMB Engineers & Planners, Inc. Intersection Time Period Date County Seminole Winter SpringsCity Northbound Westbound North / South East / West Peak Hour Time Period Time Period Michael Blake Blvd SR 434 January 15, 2015 Southbound Eastbound GMB Project #: U-Turn & RTOR 564 All Vehicles 16:00 to 18:00 15-007.01 Left Through Right Left Through Right 16:00 - 16:15 0 0 0 2 0 0 16:15 - 16:30 0 0 0 3 0 1 16:30 - 16:45 0 0 0 5 0 0 16:45 - 17:00 0 0 0 1 0 3 17:00 - 17:15 0 0 0 5 0 1 17:15 - 17:30 0 0 0 1 0 0 17:30 - 17:45 0 0 0 2 0 2 17:45 - 18:00 0 0 0 6 0 1 000 2508 Left Through Right Left Through Right 16:00 - 16:15 8 249 0 0 218 5 16:15 - 16:30 4 218 0 0 216 10 16:30 - 16:45 11 261 0 0 230 9 16:45 - 17:00 13 254 0 0 247 13 17:00 - 17:15 11 276 1 0 272 3 17:15 - 17:30 12 344 0 0 282 717:30 - 17:45 11 331 0 0 313 9 17:45 - 18:00 18 258 0 0 261 9 88 2,191 1 0 2,039 65 4014 28 Michael Blake Blvd 1,128 0 SR 434 17:00 - 18:00 52 1,209 1 000 Time Period Date Intersection Michael Blake Blvd January 15, 2015 Roadway Count Summary GMB Engineers & Planners, Inc. SouthboundNorthbound 2,436 WestboundEastbound North / South East / West Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 0.91 Total Pk Hr Voume Time Period & Time Period GMB Project #: County Winter SpringsSeminoleCity SR 434 565 & 16:00 to 18:00 15-007.01 Left Through Right Left Through Right 16:00 - 16:15 0 0 0 0 0 016:15 - 16:30 0 0 0 0 0 016:30 - 16:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:45 - 17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:00 - 17:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:15 - 17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:30 - 17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:45 - 18:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 Left Through Right Left Through Right 16:00 - 16:15 0 2 0 0 7 0 16:15 - 16:30 0 3 0 0 2 0 16:30 - 16:45 0 5 0 0 8 0 16:45 - 17:00 0 0 0 0 5 0 17:00 - 17:15 0 2 0 0 1 0 17:15 - 17:30 0 3 0 0 0 0 17:30 - 17:45 0 2 0 0 0 0 17:45 - 18:00 0 3 0 0 1 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%0.0% Michael Blake Blvd 0.2% SR 434 0.0% 17:00 - 18:00 0.0% 0.8% 0.0%0.0% 0.0% 0.0% SR 434 Westbound GMB Project #: Time Period Northbound Southbound Eastbound Roadway Count Summary GMB Engineers & Planners, Inc. Intersection Time Period Date Michael Blake Blvd January 15, 2015 County Seminole Winter Springs Trucks City North / South East / West Peak Hour Time Period 566 & 16:00 to 18:00 15-007.01 Left Through Right Left Through Right 16:00-16:15 000 000 16:15-16:30 000 000 16:30-16:45 000 000 16:45-17:00 000 00017:00-17:15 000 00017:15-17:30 000 00017:30-17:45 000 000 17:45-18:00 000 000 Left Through Right Left Through Right 16:00-16:15 400 000 16:15-16:30 200 000 16:30-16:45 400 000 16:45-17:00 800 000 17:00-17:15 600 00017:15-17:30 300 00017:30-17:45 300 00017:45-18:00 600 000 000 0 Michael Blake Blvd 0 SR 434 0 17:00 - 18:00 18 0 0 000 Roadway Count Summary GMB Engineers & Planners, Inc. Intersection Time Period Date County Seminole Winter SpringsCity Northbound Westbound North / South East / West Peak Hour Time Period Time Period Michael Blake Blvd SR 434 January 15, 2015 Southbound Eastbound GMB Project #: U-Turn & RTOR 567 568 Name IP Direction WL ET ST EL WT NT Gate Channel 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Phase/OL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2 4 6 8 Type VEH VEH VEH VEH VEH VEH VEH VEH OLP OLP OLP OLP PED PED PED PED Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 3 4 7 8 Min Grn 6 15 6 6 6 15 6 6 6 6 6 6 Passage 3 4 3 4 3 4 3 4 6 10 10 6 Max 1 15 70 50 65 15 70 65 50 65 65 65 65 Max 2 15 70 50 65 15 70 65 50 65 65 65 65 Yel Clr 4.8 4.9 4.8 3.4 4.9 4.9 3.4 4.8 4.8 3.4 3.4 4.8 Red Clr 2.6 2 3.9 4.1 2.4 2 4.1 3.9 3.9 4.1 4.1 3.9 Walk 7 7 7 7 7 7 Ped Clr 33 40 21 41 40 41 Red Rvrt 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Added Init Max Initial Max3 Limit Max3 Step Time B-4 Cars B-4 Time to Reduce By Min Gap Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Assign 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Enable X X X X X X X X Max2 Min ®X X Max Inh Max ®Cnf Ph 7 8 3 4 Ped ® Soft ®Assign 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Lock Call X X X X X X Max2 Flash Ent X X Max Inh Flash Exit X X 7 8 3 4 Dual Entry X X X X X X Sim Gap X X Assign Cond Serv Max2 Reservice Max Inh Cnf Phase 7 8 3 4 Grn Yel Red Overlap - A 1 4.5 2 Overlap - B 2 4.5 2 Overlap - C 3 4.5 2 Overlap - D 4 4.5 2 Overlap - E 5 4.5 2 Overlap - F 6 4.5 2 Overlap - G 7 4.5 2 Overlap - H 8 4.5 2 Overlap - I 9 4.5 2 Overlap - J 10 4.5 2 Overlap - K 11 4.5 2 Overlap - L 12 4.5 2 Overlap - M 13 4.5 2 Overlap - N 14 4.5 2 Overlap - O 15 4.5 2 Overlap - P 16 4.5 2 X Enbl Trk Grn Min Dwl Pre Run 1 OFF Pre Run 2 OFF Pre Run 3 ON 3 8 1 5 Pre Run 4 ON 4 7 1 5 Pre Run 5 ON 2 5 2 6 Pre Run 6 ON 1 6 2 6 Seminole County Traffic Engineering Timing Sheet Intersection: SR 434 @ 35-Tuskawilla Rd #2392 SR434 Tuskawilla SR434 Tuskawilla 010.046.174.024 Mask 255.255.255.0 10.46.174.254 Port #5083 Com ID #1365Ph Mode STD8 Node #2392 Date 7-Feb-17 Done By EPrincipe Free Seq 9 Phase Times Alt Phase Times 1 Assign Min Grn Passage Max 1 Max 2 Yel Clr Red Clr Walk Ped Clr Alt Phase Times 2 Assign Min Grn Ped Clr Phase Options Alt Phase Opt 1 Passage Max 1 Max 2 Yel Clr Red Clr Walk Alt Phase Opt 2 Cnf Ph Alt Phase Opt 3 Cnf Ph Included Phase Modifier Phase NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL Track Phase Track Overlap Dwell Phase Dwell Overlap Exit Phase 1 2392 TS SR 434 @ Tuskawilla569 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Evt Hr Min Act Evnt Hr Min Act Split 1 27 67 58 28 18 76 28 58 Sun 1 99 Mon 1 99 Coord Ph X 2 10 8 2 6 30 1 Mode NON MAX NON NON NON MAX NON NON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT D 3 10 30 18 D 3 6 45 11 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A 4 11 8 A 4 7 10 21 Split 2 18 49 33 30 18 49 30 33 Y 5 12 30 18 Y 5 7 30 1 Coord Ph X 6 13 8 6 9 30 2 Mode NON MAX NON NON NON MAX NON NON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT P 7 19 30 99 P 7 13 30 3 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 L 8 L 8 14 15 13 Split 3 19 54 43 24 18 55 24 43 A 9 A 9 14 45 3 Coord Ph X N 10 N 10 16 4 Mode NON MAX NON NON NON MAX NON NON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 11 11 19 5 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1 12 2 12 20 30 99 Split 4 23 82 40 25 18 87 25 40 13 13 Coord Ph X 14 14 Mode NON MAX NON NON NON MAX NON NON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 15 15 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Evt Hr Min Act Evt Hr Min Act Split 5 18 48 28 26 18 48 26 28 Tue 1 99 Wed 1 99 Coord Ph X 2 6 30 1 2 6 30 1 Mode NON MAX NON NON NON MAX NON NON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT D 3 6 45 11 D 3 6 45 11 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A 4 7 10 21 A 4 7 10 21 Split 6 18 49 28 25 18 49 25 28 Y 5 7 30 1 Y 5 7 30 1 Coord Ph X 6 9 30 2 6 9 30 2 Mode NON MAX NON NON NON MAX NON NON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT P 7 13 30 3 P 7 13 15 13 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 L 8 14 15 13 L 8 13 45 3 Split 7 A 9 14 45 3 A 9 16 4 Coord Ph X N 10 16 4 N 10 19 5 Mode NON MAXNON NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 11 19 5 11 20 30 99 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 3 12 20 30 99 4 12 Split 8 18 49 28 25 18 49 25 28 13 13 Coord Ph X 14 14 Mode NON MAX NON NON NON MAX NON NON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 15 15 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Evt Hr Min Act Evt Hr Min Act Split 9 Thur 1 99 Fri 1 99 Coord Ph X 2 6 30 1 2 6 30 1 Mode NON MAXNON NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT D 3 6 45 11 D 3 6 45 11 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A 4 7 10 21 A 4 7 10 21 Split 10 Y 5 7 30 1 Y 5 7 30 1 Coord Ph X 6 9 30 2 6 9 30 2 Mode NON MAXNON NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT P 7 13 30 3 P 7 13 30 3 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 L 8 14 15 13 L 8 14 15 13 Split 11 23 45 78 34 20 48 34 78 A 9 14 45 3 A 9 14 45 3 Coord Ph X N 10 16 4 N 10 16 4 Mode NON MAX NON NON NON MAX NON NON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 11 19 5 11 19 5 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 5 12 20 30 99 6 12 20 30 99 Split 12 13 13 Coord Ph X 14 14 Mode NON MAXNON NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 15 15 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Evt Hr Min Act Evt Hr Min Act Split 13 20 42 30 48 18 44 48 30 Sat 1 99 Spc 1 99 Coord Ph X 2 8 6 Plan 2 6 30 1 Mode NON MAX NON NON NON MAX NON NON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT D 3 20 99 D 3 6 45 11 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A 4 A 4 7 10 21 Split 14 Y 5 Y 5 7 30 1 Coord Ph X 6 6 9 30 2 Mode NON MAXNON NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT P 7 P 7 11 15 13 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 L 8 L 8 12 2 Split 15 A 9 A 9 13 30 3 Coord Ph X N 10 N 10 16 4 Mode NON MAXNON NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 11 11 19 5 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 7 12 8 12 20 30 99 Split 16 13 13 Coord Ph X 14 14 Mode NON MAXNON NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 15 15 Coordination Splits 1-16 Day Plans 1-8 2 2392 TS SR 434 @ Tuskawilla570 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Evt Hr Min Act Evt Hr Min Act Split 17 Spc 1 Spc 1 Coord Ph X Plan 2 Plan 2 Mode NON MAXNON NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT D 3 D 3 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A 4 A 4 Split 18 18 34 28 40 18 34 40 28 Y 5 Y 5 Coord Ph X 6 6 Mode NON MAX NON NON NON MAX NON NON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT P 7 P 7 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 L 8 L 8 Split 19 A 9 A 9 Coord Ph X N 10 N 10 Mode NON MAXNON NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 11 11 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 9 12 10 12 Split 20 13 13 Coord Ph X 14 14 Mode NON MAXNON NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 15 15 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Evt Hr Min Act Evt Hr Min Act Split 21 20 49 55 56 20 49 55 56 Spc 1 Spc 1 Coord Ph X Plan 2 Plan 2 Mode NON MAX NON NON NON MAX NON NON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT D 3 D 3 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A 4 A 4 Split 22 Y 5 Y 5 Coord Ph X 6 6 Mode NON MAXNON NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT P 7 P 7 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 L 8 L 8 Split 23 A 9 A 9 Coord Ph X N 10 N 10 Mode NON MAXNON NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 11 11 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 11 12 12 12 Split 24 13 13 Coord Ph X OFF 14 14 Mode NON MAXNON NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 15 15 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Evt Hr Min Act Evt Hr Min Act Split 25 Spc 1 Spc 1 Coord Ph X Plan 2 Plan 2 Mode NON MAXNON NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT D 3 D 3 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A 4 A 4 Split 26 Y 5 Y 5 Coord Ph X 6 6 Mode NON MAXNON NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT P 7 P 7 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 L 8 L 8 Split 27 A 9 A 9 Coord Ph X N 10 N 10 Mode NON MAXNON NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 11 11 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 13 12 14 12 Split 28 13 13 Coord Ph X 14 14 Mode NON MAXNON NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 15 15 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Evt Hr Min Act Evt Hr Min Act Split 29 Spc 1 Spc 1 Coord Ph X Plan 2 Plan 2 Mode NON MAXNON NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT D 3 D 3 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A 4 A 4 Split 30 Y 5 Y 5 Coord Ph X 6 6 Mode NON MAXNON NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT P 7 P 7 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 L 8 L 8 Split 31 A 9 A 9 Coord Ph X N 10 N 10 Mode NON MAXNON NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 11 11 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 15 12 16 12 Split 32 13 13 Coord Ph X 14 14 Mode NON MAXNON NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 15 15 Coordination Splits 17-32 Day Plans 9-16 3 2392 TS SR 434 @ Tuskawilla571 on Act C O SP Seq TM OPT Det CIR Sh Lng No S No S Yld Mx2 Flt R Hld In1 In2 In3 In4 In5 In6 In7 In8 YINH Pattern - 1 1 180 176 1 5 1 12 22 X Pattern - 2 2 130 80 2 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 3 3 140 92 3 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 4 4 170 77 4 5 2 12 22 X X Pattern - 5 5 120 11 5 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 6 6 120 41 6 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 7 7 7 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 8 8 120 41 8 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 9 9 9 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 10 10 10 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 11 11 180 147 11 5 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 12 12 12 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 13 13 140 92 13 9 2 12 22 X X Pattern - 14 14 14 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 15 15 15 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 16 16 16 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 17 17 17 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 18 18 120 41 18 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 19 19 19 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 20 20 20 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 21 21 180 176 21 9 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 22 22 22 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 23 23 23 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 24 24 24 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 25 25 25 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 26 26 26 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 27 27 27 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 28 28 28 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 29 29 29 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 30 30 30 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 31 31 31 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 32 32 32 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 33 33 32 9 1 1 Pattern - 34 34 9 Pattern - 35 35 9 Pattern - 36 36 9 Pattern - 37 37 9 Pattern - 38 38 9 Pattern - 39 39 9 Pattern - 40 40 9 Pattern - 41 41 9 Pattern - 42 42 9 Pattern - 43 43 9 Pattern - 44 44 9 Pattern - 45 45 9 Pattern - 46 46 9 Pattern - 47 47 9 Pattern - 48 48 9 Det Call Swt Dly Lck Src Det Call Swt Dly Lck Src Det Call Swt Dly Lck Src Det Call Swt Dly Lck Src Detector 1 1 6 17 33 49 Detector 2 2 18 34 50 Detector 3 2 19 35 51 Detector 4 4 20 36 52 Detector 5 4 21 37 53 Detector 6 5 2 22 38 54 Detector 7 6 23 39 55 Detector 8 6 24 40 56 Detector 9 6 25 41 57 Detector 10 6 26 42 58 Detector 11 8 27 43 59 Detector 12 8 28 44 60 Detector 13 8 29 45 61 Detector 14 30 46 62 Detector 15 31 47 63 Detector 16 32 48 64 4 2392 TS SR 434 @ Tuskawilla572 P6 P6 6 1 P6 P6 P8 P4 W E 5 6 4 1 2 2R 8 5 P2 P2 P8 P4 2 P2 P2 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 7 P6 P6 6 1 P6 P6 P4 P8 5 6 4 1 2 2R 8 5 P2 P2 P4 P8 2 P2 P2 1 2 4 3 5 6 7 8Ring 2 Ring 1 Ring 2 Tuskawilla Rd S.R. 434 Seq 9 Ring 1 N Tuskawilla Rd S.R. 434 S Cabinet Seq 5 Intersection Notes T.O.D Notes Intersection set as concurent sides. But operates as Q-Seq due to Intersection re-timed January 2017. set up of controller (phases enabled and conflicting phases).Patterns 11,13 & 21 are used for High School AM rush with Alt Time Plan 1. Phases 1 + 5 are 5-sect. and Det. Switched.Alt Time Plan 1 to allow higher extend times to phase 4 for PM school 2R hardwired to Phase 8.rush time. 5 2392 TS SR 434 @ Tuskawilla573 Name IP Direction WL ET ST EL WT SL NT Gate Channel 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Phase/OL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 2 4 6 8 Type VEH VEH VEH VEH VEH VEH VEH VEH OLP OLP OLP OLP PED PED PED PED Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Min Grn 6 15 8 6 15 6 8 Passage 3 5 3 3 5 3 3 Max 1 30 70 25 30 70 20 20 Max 2 30 70 20 30 70 20 20 Yel Clr 4.8 4.8 3.4 4.8 4.8 3.4 3.4 Red Clr 2.3 2 3.8 2.4 2 2.9 3.8 Walk 7 7 7 7 Ped Clr 19 32 19 31 Red Rvrt 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Added Init Max Initial Max3 Limit Max3 Step Time B-4 Cars B-4 Time to Reduce By Min Gap Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Assign 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 Enable X X X X X X X Max2 Min ®X X Max Inh Max ®Cnf Ph Ped ® Soft ®Assign 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 Lock Call X X X X Max2 Flash Ent X X Max Inh Flash Exit X X Dual Entry X X X X Sim Gap X X Assign Cond Serv Max2 Reservice Max Inh Cnf Phase Grn Yel Red Overlap - A 1 4.5 2 Overlap - B 2 4.5 2 Overlap - C 3 4.5 2 Overlap - D 4 4.5 2 Overlap - E 5 4.5 2 Overlap - F 6 4.5 2 Overlap - G 7 4.5 2 Overlap - H 8 4.5 2 Overlap - I 9 4.5 2 Overlap - J 10 4.5 2 Overlap - K 11 4.5 2 Overlap - L 12 4.5 2 Overlap - M 13 4.5 2 Overlap - N 14 4.5 2 Overlap - O 15 4.5 2 Overlap - P 16 4.5 2 X Enbl Trk Grn Min Dwl Pre Run 1 OFF Pre Run 2 OFF Pre Run 3 ON 8 4 8 Pre Run 4 ON 4 7 4 8 Pre Run 5 ON 2 5 2 6 Pre Run 6 ON 1 6 2 6 Seminole County Traffic Engineering Timing Sheet Intersection: SR 434 @ 34-Doran Dr #12076 SR 434 Bear Spgs SR 434 Bear Spgs 010.046.174.022 Mask 255.255.255.0 10.46.174.254 Port #5082 Com ID #1360Ph Mode STD8 Node #12076 Date 7-Feb-17 Done By EPrincipe Free Seq 1 Phase Times Alt Phase Times 1 Assign Min Grn Passage Max 1 Max 2 Yel Clr Red Clr Walk Ped Clr Alt Phase Times 2 Assign Min Grn Ped Clr Phase Options Alt Phase Opt 1 Passage Max 1 Max 2 Yel Clr Red Clr Walk Alt Phase Opt 2 Cnf Ph Alt Phase Opt 3 Cnf Ph Included Phase Modifier Phase NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL Track Phase Track Overlap Dwell Phase Dwell Overlap Exit Phase 1 12076 TS SR 434 @ Doran574 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Evt Hr Min Act Evnt Hr Min Act Split 1 18 117 45 18 117 18 27 Sun 1 99 Mon 1 99 Coord Ph X 2 10 8 2 6 30 1 Mode NON MAX OMT NON NON MAX NON NON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT D 3 19 30 99 D 3 9 30 2 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A 4 A 4 13 30 3 Split 2 18 75 37 20 73 18 19 Y 5 Y 5 14 20 13 Coord Ph X 6 6 14 45 3 Mode NON MAX OMT NON NON MAX NON NON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT P 7 P 7 15 15 13 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 L 8 L 8 15 45 3 Split 3 18 85 37 19 84 18 19 A 9 A 9 16 4 Coord Ph X N 10 N 10 19 5 Mode NON MAX OMT NON NON MAX NON NON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 11 11 20 30 99 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1 12 2 12 Split 4 18 115 37 24 109 18 19 13 13 Coord Ph X 14 14 Mode NON MAX OMT NON NON MAX NON NON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 15 15 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Evt Hr Min Act Evt Hr Min Act Split 5 20 63 37 20 63 18 19 Tue 1 99 Wed 1 99 Coord Ph X 2 6 30 1 2 6 30 1 Mode NON MAX OMT NON NON MAX NON NON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT D 3 9 30 2 D 3 9 30 2 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A 4 13 30 3 A 4 13 15 3 Split 6 18 65 37 19 64 18 19 Y 5 14 20 13 Y 5 14 20 13 Coord Ph X 6 14 45 3 6 14 45 3 Mode NON MAX OMT NON NON MAX NON NON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT P 7 15 15 13 P 7 15 15 13 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 L 8 15 45 3 L 8 15 45 3 Split 7 A 9 16 4 A 9 16 4 Coord Ph X N 10 19 5 N 10 19 5 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 11 20 30 99 11 20 30 99 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 3 12 4 12 Split 8 18 65 37 19 64 18 19 13 13 Coord Ph X 14 14 Mode NON MAX OMT NON NON MAX NON NON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 15 15 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Evt Hr Min Act Evt Hr Min Act Split 9 Thur 1 99 Fri 1 99 Coord Ph X 2 6 30 1 2 6 30 1 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT D 3 9 30 2 D 3 9 30 2 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A 4 13 30 3 A 4 13 30 3 Split 10 Y 5 14 20 13 Y 5 14 20 13 Coord Ph X 6 14 45 3 6 14 45 3 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT P 7 15 15 13 P 7 15 15 13 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 L 8 15 45 3 L 8 15 45 3 Split 11 A 9 16 4 A 9 16 4 Coord Ph X N 10 19 5 N 10 19 5 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 11 20 30 99 11 20 30 99 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 5 12 6 12 Split 12 13 13 Coord Ph X 14 14 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 15 15 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Evt Hr Min Act Evt Hr Min Act Split 13 18 85 37 19 84 18 19 Sat 1 99 Spc 1 Coord Ph X 2 8 6 Plan 2 Mode NON MAX OMT NON NON MAX NON NON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT D 3 20 99 D 3 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A 4 A 4 Split 14 Y 5 Y 5 Coord Ph X 6 6 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT P 7 P 7 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 L 8 L 8 Split 15 A 9 A 9 Coord Ph X N 10 N 10 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 11 11 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 7 12 8 12 Split 16 13 13 Coord Ph X 14 14 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 15 15 Coordination Splits 1-16 Day Plans 1-8 2 12076 TS SR 434 @ Doran575 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Evt Hr Min Act Evt Hr Min Act Split 17 Spc 1 Spc 1 Coord Ph X Plan 2 Plan 2 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT D 3 D 3 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A 4 A 4 Split 18 Y 5 Y 5 Coord Ph X 6 6 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT P 7 P 7 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 L 8 L 8 Split 19 A 9 A 9 Coord Ph X N 10 N 10 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 11 11 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 9 12 10 12 Split 20 13 13 Coord Ph X 14 14 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 15 15 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Evt Hr Min Act Evt Hr Min Act Split 21 Spc 1 Spc 1 Coord Ph X Plan 2 Plan 2 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT D 3 D 3 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A 4 A 4 Split 22 Y 5 Y 5 Coord Ph X 6 6 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT P 7 P 7 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 L 8 L 8 Split 23 A 9 A 9 Coord Ph X N 10 N 10 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 11 11 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 11 12 12 12 Split 24 13 13 Coord Ph X OFF 14 14 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 15 15 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Evt Hr Min Act Evt Hr Min Act Split 25 Spc 1 Spc 1 Coord Ph X Plan 2 Plan 2 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT D 3 D 3 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A 4 A 4 Split 26 Y 5 Y 5 Coord Ph X 6 6 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT P 7 P 7 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 L 8 L 8 Split 27 A 9 A 9 Coord Ph X N 10 N 10 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 11 11 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 13 12 14 12 Split 28 13 13 Coord Ph X 14 14 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 15 15 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Evt Hr Min Act Evt Hr Min Act Split 29 Spc 1 Spc 1 Coord Ph X Plan 2 Plan 2 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT D 3 D 3 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A 4 A 4 Split 30 Y 5 Y 5 Coord Ph X 6 6 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT P 7 P 7 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 L 8 L 8 Split 31 A 9 A 9 Coord Ph X N 10 N 10 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 11 11 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 15 12 16 12 Split 32 13 13 Coord Ph X 14 14 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 15 15 Coordination Splits 17-32 Day Plans 9-16 3 12076 TS SR 434 @ Doran576 on Act C O SP Seq TM OPT Det CIR Sh Lng No S No S Yld Mx2 Flt R Hld In1 In2 In3 In4 In5 In6 In7 In8 YINH Pattern - 1 1 180 57 1 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 2 2 130 92 2 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 3 3 140 109 3 1 2 12 22 X X Pattern - 4 4 170 114 4 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 5 5 120 12 5 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 6 6 120 52 6 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 7 7 7 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 8 8 120 52 8 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 9 9 9 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 10 10 10 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 11 11 11 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 12 12 12 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 13 13 140 102 13 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 14 14 14 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 15 15 15 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 16 16 16 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 17 17 17 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 18 18 18 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 19 19 19 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 20 20 20 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 21 21 21 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 22 22 22 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 23 23 23 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 24 24 24 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 25 25 25 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 26 26 26 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 27 27 27 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 28 28 28 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 29 29 29 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 30 30 30 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 31 31 31 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 32 32 32 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 33 33 1 Pattern - 34 34 1 Pattern - 35 35 1 Pattern - 36 36 1 Pattern - 37 37 1 Pattern - 38 38 1 Pattern - 39 39 1 Pattern - 40 40 1 Pattern - 41 41 1 Pattern - 42 42 1 Pattern - 43 43 1 Pattern - 44 44 1 Pattern - 45 45 1 Pattern - 46 46 1 Pattern - 47 47 1 Pattern - 48 48 1 Det Call Swt Dly Lck Src Det Call Swt Dly Lck Src Det Call Swt Dly Lck Src Det Call Swt Dly Lck Src Detector 1 1 6 17 33 4 13 49 Detector 2 2 18 34 50 Detector 3 2 19 35 51 Detector 4 2 20 36 52 Detector 5 2 21 37 53 Detector 6 8 22 38 54 Detector 7 4 8 23 39 55 Detector 8 5 2 24 40 56 Detector 9 6 25 41 57 Detector 10 6 26 42 58 Detector 11 6 27 43 59 Detector 12 6 28 44 60 Detector 13 7 29 45 61 Detector 14 8 8 30 46 62 Detector 15 31 47 63 Detector 16 32 48 64 4 12076 TS SR 434 @ Doran577 P6 P6 P4 6 4 7 1 P6 P6 5 6 P4 W E P4 P8 1 2 4 5 P2 P2 8 2 P4 P8 P2 P2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Ring 1 Ring 2 Bear Springs Dr. Mc Leod's Way N SR 434 S Cabinet Seq 1 Intersection Notes T.O.D Notes Intersection set up with concurent sides.Intersection re-timed January 2017. Phases 1 & 5 are 5_sec and use Det switching. Phase 7 extended with sourcing if no call on 8. 5 12076 TS SR 434 @ Doran578 APPENDIX C Synchro Capacity Analysis Worksheets Existing Conditions 579 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing Traffic Volumes 14: SR 434 & Doran Dr A.M. Peak Hour TPD, Inc.Synchro 9 Report 04/10/2017 Page 3 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 7 1194 3 5 1415 16 16 0 14 9 0 8 Future Volume (vph) 7 1194 3 5 1415 16 16 0 14 9 0 8 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 330 0 365 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 50 50 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 3505 0 1805 3499 0 0 1805 1615 0 1626 1429 Flt Permitted 0.155 0.207 0.752 0.746 Satd. Flow (perm) 294 3505 0 393 3499 0 0 1429 1615 0 1277 1429 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 1 105 67 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 1139 1456 348 488 Travel Time (s) 17.3 22.1 9.5 13.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 3% 0% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 11% 0% 13% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 7 1260 0 5 1506 0 0 17 15 0 9 8 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 8 4 4 Total Split (s) 18.0 117.0 18.0 117.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 18.0 45.0 45.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.2 6.8 7.1 6.8 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 Act Effct Green (s) 161.6 163.5 161.7 163.5 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.90 0.91 0.90 0.91 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.02 0.40 0.01 0.47 0.25 0.08 0.15 0.06 Control Delay 1.9 2.9 1.2 6.7 91.1 0.9 87.1 0.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 1.9 2.9 1.2 6.7 91.1 0.9 87.1 0.9 LOS AA AA FA FA Approach Delay 2.8 6.7 48.8 46.5 Approach LOS A A D D Queue Length 50th (ft) 1 115 1 578 20 0 10 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 3 259 m1 690 49 0 33 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1059 1376 268 408 Turn Bay Length (ft) 330 365 Base Capacity (vph) 356 3184 440 3178 157 271 268 353 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.02 0.40 0.01 0.47 0.11 0.06 0.03 0.02 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 57 (32%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL, Start of Green Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.47 Intersection Signal Delay: 5.7 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 14: SR 434 & Doran Dr 580 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing Traffic Volumes 8: Tuskawilla Rd & SR 434 A.M. Peak Hour TPD, Inc.Synchro 9 Report 04/10/2017 Page 2 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 44 882 438 149 952 34 520 72 132 62 75 2 Future Volume (vph) 44 882 438 149 952 34 520 72 132 62 75 2 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 315 450 370 0 525 0 150 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 50 50 100 50 Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 3505 1599 1787 3520 0 3400 1716 0 1752 1874 0 Flt Permitted 0.151 0.123 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 273 3505 1599 231 3520 0 3400 1716 0 1752 1874 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 456 2 50 1 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 30 Link Distance (ft) 1456 435 3056 544 Travel Time (s) 22.1 6.6 46.3 12.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 3% 1% 1% 2% 3% 3% 0% 0% 3% 1% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 46 919 456 155 1027 0 542 213 0 65 80 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA custom pm+pt NA Split NA Split NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 4 4 Permitted Phases 2 8 6 Total Split (s) 20.0 49.0 56.0 20.0 49.0 56.0 56.0 55.0 55.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.3 6.9 8.7 7.4 6.9 8.7 8.7 7.5 7.5 Act Effct Green (s) 71.9 63.9 53.1 86.1 74.9 53.1 53.1 15.9 15.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.40 0.36 0.30 0.48 0.42 0.30 0.30 0.09 0.09 v/c Ratio 0.26 0.74 0.58 0.61 0.70 0.54 0.39 0.42 0.48 Control Delay 42.9 63.0 6.6 41.9 48.2 54.1 38.1 85.1 86.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 42.9 63.0 6.6 41.9 48.2 54.1 38.1 85.1 86.1 LOS D E A D D D D F F Approach Delay 44.3 47.4 49.5 85.7 Approach LOS D D D F Queue Length 50th (ft) 31 537 62 100 526 283 156 74 91 Queue Length 95th (ft) 86 #812 186 #254 #922 282 196 127 149 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1376 355 2976 464 Turn Bay Length (ft) 315 450 370 525 150 Base Capacity (vph) 217 1244 810 253 1466 1054 566 462 495 Starvation Cap Reductn 00000 00 00 Spillback Cap Reductn 00000 00 00 Storage Cap Reductn 00000 00 00 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.21 0.74 0.56 0.61 0.70 0.51 0.38 0.14 0.16 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 176 (98%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL, Start of Green Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.74 Intersection Signal Delay: 48.2 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.9% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 8: Tuskawilla Rd & SR 434 581 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing Traffic Volumes 6: SR 434 & Michael Blake Blvd A.M. Peak Hour TPD, Inc.Synchro 9 Report 04/10/2017 Page 1 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 23 1067 1123 6 47 25 Future Volume (Veh/h) 23 1067 1123 6 47 25 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly flow rate (vph) 25 1147 1208 6 51 27 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Raised Raised Median storage veh) 1 1 Upstream signal (ft) 876 pX, platoon unblocked 0.77 vC, conflicting volume 1214 1834 607 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 1211 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 624 vCu, unblocked vol 1214 1490 607 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 96 74 94 cM capacity (veh/h) 582 198 444 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1 Volume Total 25 574 574 805 409 78 Volume Left 25 000051 Volume Right 0000627 cSH 582 1700 1700 1700 1700 245 Volume to Capacity 0.04 0.34 0.34 0.47 0.24 0.32 Queue Length 95th (ft)3000033 Control Delay (s) 11.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.4 Lane LOS B D Approach Delay (s) 0.2 0.0 26.4 Approach LOS D Intersection Summary Average Delay 1.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization Err% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 582 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing Traffic Volumes 14: SR 434 & Doran Dr P.M. Peak Hour TPD, Inc.Synchro 9 Report 04/10/2017 Page 3 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 11 1390 15 12 1290 77098234 Future Volume (vph) 11 1390 15 12 1290 77098234 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 330 0 365 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 50 50 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 3499 0 1805 3502 0 0 1805 1615 0 1680 1429 Flt Permitted 0.180 0.157 0.751 0.764 Satd. Flow (perm) 342 3499 0 298 3502 0 0 1427 1615 0 1334 1429 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 1 1 110 70 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 1139 1456 348 488 Travel Time (s) 17.3 22.1 9.5 13.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 3% 0% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 11% 0% 13% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 12 1479 0 13 1365 007901036 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 8 4 4 Total Split (s) 24.0 115.0 18.0 109.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 18.0 37.0 37.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.2 6.8 7.1 6.8 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 Act Effct Green (s) 147.7 147.1 147.8 147.0 8.1 8.1 8.1 8.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.86 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.03 0.49 0.04 0.45 0.10 0.05 0.16 0.27 Control Delay 1.8 4.6 2.8 4.8 80.9 0.6 83.6 5.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 1.8 4.6 2.8 4.8 80.9 0.6 83.6 5.3 LOS AA AA FA FA Approach Delay 4.6 4.8 35.7 22.3 Approach LOS A A D C Queue Length 50th (ft) 1 150 2 107 8 0 11 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 4 316 m4 255 26 0 34 3 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1059 1376 268 408 Turn Bay Length (ft) 330 365 Base Capacity (vph) 447 3027 359 3028 99 214 233 308 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.03 0.49 0.04 0.45 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.12 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 170 Actuated Cycle Length: 170 Offset: 114 (67%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL, Start of Green Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.49 Intersection Signal Delay: 5.1 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.9% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 14: SR 434 & Doran Dr 583 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing Traffic Volumes 8: Tuskawilla Rd & SR 434 P.M. Peak Hour TPD, Inc.Synchro 9 Report 04/10/2017 Page 2 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 41 949 469 145 882 83 481 109 112 113 135 0 Future Volume (vph) 41 949 469 145 882 83 481 109 112 113 135 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 315 450 370 0 525 0 150 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 50 50 100 50 Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 3505 1599 1787 3490 0 3400 1756 0 1752 1881 0 Flt Permitted 0.206 0.169 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 373 3505 1599 318 3490 0 3400 1756 0 1752 1881 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 463 8 27 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 30 Link Distance (ft) 1456 435 3056 544 Travel Time (s) 22.1 6.6 46.3 12.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 3% 1% 1% 2% 3% 3% 0% 0% 3% 1% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 43 989 489 151 1005 0 501 231 0 118 141 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA custom pm+pt NA Split NA Split NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 4 4 Permitted Phases 2 8 6 Total Split (s) 18.0 82.0 40.0 23.0 87.0 40.0 40.0 25.0 25.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.3 6.9 8.7 7.4 6.9 8.7 8.7 8.9 8.9 Act Effct Green (s) 86.9 79.9 30.7 97.3 87.4 30.7 30.7 15.4 15.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.51 0.47 0.18 0.57 0.51 0.18 0.18 0.09 0.09 v/c Ratio 0.17 0.60 0.73 0.53 0.56 0.82 0.68 0.75 0.83 Control Delay 17.9 33.0 19.9 23.6 30.5 78.6 68.3 102.4 110.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 17.9 33.0 19.9 23.6 30.5 78.6 68.3 102.4 110.4 LOS BCBCC EE FF Approach Delay 28.4 29.6 75.3 106.8 Approach LOS C C E F Queue Length 50th (ft) 20 336 98 76 412 279 215 130 157 Queue Length 95th (ft) 41 376 288 116 493 348 317 #224 #274 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1376 355 2976 464 Turn Bay Length (ft) 315 450 370 525 150 Base Capacity (vph) 282 1648 672 319 1798 626 345 165 178 Starvation Cap Reductn 00000 00 00 Spillback Cap Reductn 00000 00 00 Storage Cap Reductn 00000 00 00 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.15 0.60 0.73 0.47 0.56 0.80 0.67 0.72 0.79 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 170 Actuated Cycle Length: 170 Offset: 77 (45%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL, Start of Green Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.83 Intersection Signal Delay: 43.7 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.7% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 8: Tuskawilla Rd & SR 434 584 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing Traffic Volumes 6: SR 434 & Michael Blake Blvd P.M. Peak Hour TPD, Inc.Synchro 9 Report 04/10/2017 Page 1 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 52 1210 1128 28 14 4 Future Volume (Veh/h) 52 1210 1128 28 14 4 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly flow rate (vph) 56 1301 1213 30 15 4 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Raised Raised Median storage veh) 1 1 Upstream signal (ft) 876 pX, platoon unblocked 0.79 vC, conflicting volume 1243 1990 622 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 1228 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 762 vCu, unblocked vol 1243 1727 622 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 90 92 99 cM capacity (veh/h) 567 179 435 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1 Volume Total 56 650 650 809 434 19 Volume Left 56 000015 Volume Right 0000304 cSH 567 1700 1700 1700 1700 205 Volume to Capacity 0.10 0.38 0.38 0.48 0.26 0.09 Queue Length 95th (ft)800008 Control Delay (s) 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.4 Lane LOS B C Approach Delay (s) 0.5 0.0 24.4 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization Err% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 585 APPENDIX D Model Distribution Plot 586 587 APPENDIX E Integra Winter Springs, Tuskawilla Crossings and Catalyst Apartments Traffic Volumes 588 49 1117+(60)=1177 552 97+(3)=100 1038+(73)=1111 171+(36)=207 566126131+(29)=1600158134+(3)=137SR 434 @Tuskawilla Rd 16 1422+(92)=1514 33+(1)=34 1327+(113)=1440517+(1)=18SR 434 @Michael Blake Blvd 3 1329+(93)=1422 64 1316+(113)=1429 72+(11)=83 3732+(9)=41SR 434 @Tuscora Dr SR 434 @Creek's Run Way/Project Access 1 1237+(142)=1379 121+(11)=132 1274+(115)=1389 199 127+(9)=13653SR 434 @Vistawilla Dr 139+(18)=157 1350+(70)=1420 147 870+(57)=927 507+(44)=515213SR 434 @SR 417 NB Ramps 1062+(88)=1150 333+(54)=387 1163+(87)=1250 26588+(13)=101130SR 434 @SR 417 SB Ramps (102) 1069 12 (62) 1082+(25)=1107 21 509(100)(0)(153)1079+(153)=1232 (62) 1102+(62)=1164 SR 434 @Project Access (RIRO)(25)Figure IV-2Project TrafficAssignment, PM Peak Project Site Intersections Analysis 0 1,500 3,000750Feet Background + (Project Trips) = Total Volume 589 52 1038+(52)=1090 516 40+(2)=42 1120+(43)=1163 175+(22)=197 61285155+(25)=18028872+(2)=74SR 434 @Tuskawilla Rd 27 1256+(80)=1136 7+(1)=8 1321+(68)=13892955+(1)=56SR 434 @Michael Blake Blvd 14 1243+(81)=1324 37 1317+(68)=1385 36+(7)=43 57110+(8)=118SR 434 @Tuscora Dr SR 434 @Creek's Run Way/Project Access 6 1293+(85)=1378 118+(7)=125 1146+(100)=1246 172 136+(8)=144152SR 434 @Vistawilla Dr 260+(11)=271 832+(42)=874 362 1181+(49)=1230 286+(38)=32449SR 434 @SR 417 NB Ramps 961+(53)=1014 562+(32)=594 1163+(87)=1250 26588+(13)=101130SR 434 @SR 417 SB Ramps (88) 1281 1 (54) 1297+(15)=1312 3 14023(60)(0)(92)1302+(92)=1394 (54) 1300+(54)=1354 SR 434 @Project Access (RIRO)(15)Figure IV-1Project TrafficAssignment, AM Peak Project Site Intersections Analysis 0 1,500 3,000750Feet Background + (Project Trips) = Total Volume 590 591 592 Projected A.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Winter Springs Apartments 4531.1Project № Figure 6 NTS NCentral Winds DrSR 434 Heritage Park St142433130 1,180+(55)=1,235 25 222 926+(13)=939 45 343540Doran DrSR 43480917 1,472+(55)=1,527 5 7 1,242+(13)=1,255 3 17015Tuskawilla RdSR 4342+(9)=1178+(9)=876535 990+(46)=1,036 155+(17)=172 46+(2)=48 917+(11)=928 456 54175+(2)=77137+(4)=141Michael BlakeBlvdSR 434 SR 434 Tuscora Dr1,165+(6)=1,171 32 13 1,099+(24)=1,123 33 5097Perimeter Rd(3) 1,194+(51)=1,245 Tuskawilla RdTree Swallow Rd 14210(2)(9) 0 (18)49159(4)Legend: 000 + (000) = 000 Total Traffic Project Traffic Background Traffic26+(51)=7749+(24)=736+(3)=9 1,168+(3)=1,171 24+(15)=39 1,110(12)10 0 55 1,134+(15)=1,149 593 Projected P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Winter Springs Apartments 4531.1Project № Figure 7 NTS NCentral Winds DrSR 434 Heritage Park St1001157128 1,489+(29)=1,518 51 146 1,542+(54)=1,596 44 412750Doran DrSR 43435287 1,342+(29)=1,371 13 11 1,446+(54)=1,500 16 709Tuskawilla RdSR 4340140+(5)=145118+(5)=12386 917+(24)=941 151+(9)=160 43+(9)=52 987+(45)=1,032 488 500113+(9)=122117+(17)=134Michael BlakeBlvdSR 434 4+(27)=3115+(13)=2829+(12)=41 1,173+(12)=1,185 54+(62)=116 1,258 SR 434 Tuscora Dr1,163+(24)=1,187 65 3 1,175+(13)=1,188 57 3328Perimeter RdTuskawilla RdLegend: 000 + (000) = 000 Total Traffic Project Traffic Background Traffic (12) 1,177+(27)=1,204 41198(9)(5) 0 (10) 13 0 166 110181(18)(6)1,312+(62)=1,374 Tree Swallow Rd 594 APPENDIX F Synchro Capacity Analysis Worksheets Projected Conditions 595 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: SR 434 & Doran Dr 03/27/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 7 1391 3 5 1683 17 17 0 15 9 0 8 Future Volume (vph) 7 1391 3 5 1683 17 17 0 15 9 0 8 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 330 0 365 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 50 50 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.998 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 3505 0 1805 3499 0 0 1805 1615 0 1626 1429 Flt Permitted 0.107 0.161 0.752 0.746 Satd. Flow (perm) 203 3505 0 306 3499 0 0 1429 1615 0 1277 1429 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR)1 105 67 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 1139 1456 348 488 Travel Time (s) 17.3 22.1 9.5 13.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 3% 0% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 11% 0% 13% Adj. Flow (vph) 7 1464 3 5 1772 18 18 0 16 9 0 8 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 7 1467 0 5 1790 0 0 18 16 0 9 8 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 45 45 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 7 4 596 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: SR 434 & Doran Dr 03/27/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Permitted Phases 2 6 8 8 4 4 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 8 8 8 7 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 15.0 6.0 15.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 15.0 33.8 13.6 37.8 16.1 16.1 16.1 14.0 32.0 32.0 Total Split (s) 18.0 117.0 18.0 117.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 18.0 45.0 45.0 Total Split (%) 10.0% 65.0% 10.0% 65.0% 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% 10.0% 25.0% 25.0% Maximum Green (s) 10.8 110.2 10.9 110.2 19.8 19.8 19.8 11.7 37.8 37.8 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 All-Red Time (s) 2.4 2.0 2.3 2.0 3.8 3.8 3.8 2.9 3.8 3.8 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.2 6.8 7.1 6.8 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max None Max None None None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 19.0 19.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 32.0 32.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 158.5 159.1 158.6 159.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.03 0.47 0.02 0.58 0.26 0.09 0.15 0.06 Control Delay 2.0 3.7 1.8 4.7 91.6 1.0 86.9 0.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 2.0 3.7 1.8 4.7 91.6 1.0 86.9 0.9 LOS A A A A F A F A Approach Delay 3.7 4.7 49.0 46.4 Approach LOS A A D D 90th %ile Green (s) 6.0 142.2 6.0 142.1 10.7 10.7 10.7 0.0 10.7 10.7 90th %ile Term Code Min Coord Min Coord Gap Gap Gap Skip Hold Hold 70th %ile Green (s) 0.0 157.1 0.0 157.1 8.9 8.9 8.9 0.0 8.9 8.9 70th %ile Term Code Skip Coord Skip Coord Gap Gap Gap Skip Hold Hold 50th %ile Green (s) 0.0 158.0 0.0 158.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 0.0 8.0 8.0 50th %ile Term Code Skip Coord Skip Coord Min Min Min Skip Min Min 30th %ile Green (s) 0.0 158.0 0.0 158.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 0.0 8.0 8.0 30th %ile Term Code Skip Coord Skip Coord Min Min Min Skip Hold Hold 10th %ile Green (s) 0.0 173.2 0.0 173.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10th %ile Term Code Skip Coord Skip Coord Skip Skip Skip Skip Skip Skip Queue Length 50th (ft) 1 147 1 214 21 0 10 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 3 332 3 480 51 0 33 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1059 1376 268 408 Turn Bay Length (ft) 330 365 Base Capacity (vph) 275 3097 361 3091 157 271 268 353 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.03 0.47 0.01 0.58 0.11 0.06 0.03 0.02 Intersection Summary 597 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: SR 434 & Doran Dr 03/27/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 57 (32%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 105 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.58 Intersection Signal Delay: 4.9 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.1% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 14: SR 434 & Doran Dr 598 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 8: Tuskawilla Rd & SR 434 03/28/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 48 1056 464 221 1171 37 563 94 205 67 104 11 Future Volume (vph) 48 1056 464 221 1171 37 563 94 205 67 104 11 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 315 450 370 0 525 0 150 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 50 50 100 50 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.995 0.897 0.986 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 3505 1599 1787 3520 0 3400 1704 0 1752 1857 0 Flt Permitted 0.103 0.057 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 186 3505 1599 107 3520 0 3400 1704 0 1752 1857 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 464 2 61 2 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 30 Link Distance (ft) 1456 435 3056 544 Travel Time (s) 22.1 6.6 46.3 12.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 3% 1% 1% 2% 3% 3% 0% 0% 3% 1% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) 50 1100 483 230 1220 39 586 98 214 70 108 11 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 50 1100 483 230 1259 0 586 312 0 70 119 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 45 32 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Split NA Split NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 4 4 599 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 8: Tuskawilla Rd & SR 434 03/28/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Permitted Phases 2 2 6 Detector Phase 5 2 2 1 6 8 8 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 15.0 15.0 6.0 15.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 13.3 45.0 45.0 13.8 34.9 60.0 60.0 30.0 30.0 Total Split (s) 13.4 64.0 64.0 26.0 76.6 60.0 60.0 30.0 30.0 Total Split (%) 7.4% 35.6% 35.6% 14.4% 42.6% 33.3% 33.3% 16.7% 16.7% Maximum Green (s) 6.1 57.1 57.1 18.6 69.7 51.3 51.3 22.5 22.5 Yellow Time (s) 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.8 4.9 4.8 4.8 3.4 3.4 All-Red Time (s) 2.4 2.0 2.0 2.6 2.0 3.9 3.9 4.1 4.1 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.3 6.9 6.9 7.4 6.9 8.7 8.7 7.5 7.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None Max None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 33.0 33.0 21.0 41.0 41.0 40.0 40.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 68.8 62.3 62.3 92.9 81.8 44.6 44.6 18.9 18.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.35 0.35 0.52 0.45 0.25 0.25 0.10 0.10 v/c Ratio 0.38 0.91 0.56 0.83 0.79 0.70 0.67 0.38 0.61 Control Delay 41.4 70.1 12.1 75.0 48.1 65.7 55.2 80.3 88.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 41.4 70.1 12.1 75.0 48.1 65.7 55.2 80.3 88.5 LOS D E B E D E E F F Approach Delay 52.1 52.3 62.0 85.5 Approach LOS D D E F Queue Length 50th (ft) 29 627 16 214 695 326 272 78 134 Queue Length 95th (ft) 81 #826 269 #436 #856 378 372 134 206 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1376 355 2976 464 Turn Bay Length (ft) 315 450 370 525 150 Base Capacity (vph) 130 1212 856 276 1600 969 529 219 233 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.38 0.91 0.56 0.83 0.79 0.60 0.59 0.32 0.51 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 176 (98%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.91 Intersection Signal Delay: 55.8 Intersection LOS: E Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.4% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 600 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 8: Tuskawilla Rd & SR 434 03/28/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 8: Tuskawilla Rd & SR 434 601 HCM 6th TWSC Projected Traffic Volumes 6: SR 434 & Michael Blake Blvd A.M. Peak Hour TPD, Inc.Synchro 9 Report 03/27/2019 Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1271.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 186 1154 4 12 1276 68 11 4 32 171 2 138 Future Vol, veh/h 186 1154 4 12 1276 68 11 4 32 171 2 138 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 330 - - 0 - - - - 0 - - 100 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 93 93 92 92 93 93 92 92 92 93 92 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 3 2 2 2 17 2 2 2 0 2 0 Mvmt Flow 200 1241 4 13 1372 73 12 4 35 184 2 148 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1445 0 0 1245 0 0 2356 3114 623 2458 3080 723 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1643 1643 - 1435 1435 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 713 1471 - 1023 1645 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.5 6.54 6.9 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.5 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.5 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.5 4.02 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 475 - - 555 - - 19 11 429 ~ 16 12 373 Stage 1 - - - - - - 104 156 - ~ 143 197 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 389 190 - 256 156 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 475 - - 555 - - ~ 6 6 429 ~ 4 7 373 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - ~ 6 6 - ~ 4 7 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 60 90 - ~ 83 192 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 226 186 - ~ 130 90 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 2.5 0.1 $ 625.9 $ 12396.4 HCM LOS F F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 6 429 475 - - 555 - - 4 373 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 2.717 0.081 0.421 - - 0.024 - - 46.511 0.398 HCM Control Delay (s) $ 1931.1 14.1 18 - - 11.6 - -$ 22266.9 20.9 HCM Lane LOS F B C - - B - - F C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 3.2 0.3 2.1 - - 0.1 - - 25.5 1.9 Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 602 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: SR 434 & Michael Blake Blvd 03/27/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 186 1154 4 12 1276 68 11 4 32 171 2 138 Future Volume (vph) 186 1154 4 12 1276 68 11 4 32 171 2 138 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 330 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 50 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.992 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.964 0.953 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 3505 0 1770 3485 0 0 1796 1583 0 1810 1615 Flt Permitted 0.044 0.163 0.810 0.717 Satd. Flow (perm) 84 3505 0 304 3485 0 0 1509 1583 0 1362 1615 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR)4 91 92 Link Speed (mph) 50 50 30 25 Link Distance (ft) 441 1255 478 597 Travel Time (s) 6.0 17.1 10.9 16.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.92 0.93 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 3% 2% 2% 2% 17% 2% 2% 2% 0% 2% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) 200 1241 4 13 1372 73 12 4 35 184 2 148 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 200 1245 0 13 1445 0 0 16 35 0 186 148 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 32 32 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 603 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: SR 434 & Michael Blake Blvd 03/27/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Permitted Phases 2 6 8 8 4 4 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 3 8 8 7 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 15.0 6.0 15.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 22.0 12.0 22.0 12.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 Total Split (s) 29.0 86.0 29.0 86.0 35.0 30.0 30.0 35.0 30.0 30.0 Total Split (%) 16.1% 47.8% 16.1% 47.8% 19.4% 16.7% 16.7% 19.4% 16.7% 16.7% Maximum Green (s) 23.0 80.0 23.0 80.0 29.0 24.0 24.0 29.0 24.0 24.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max None Max None None None None Max Max Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 109.0 104.0 90.1 83.9 59.0 59.0 59.0 59.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.61 0.58 0.50 0.47 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 v/c Ratio 0.86 0.62 0.06 0.89 0.03 0.06 0.42 0.25 Control Delay 83.4 27.3 16.2 52.1 41.5 0.2 50.7 18.2 Queue Delay 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 83.4 28.5 16.2 52.1 41.5 0.2 50.7 18.2 LOS F C B D D A D B Approach Delay 36.1 51.7 13.2 36.3 Approach LOS D D B D Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 100 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.89 Intersection Signal Delay: 42.7 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.0% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6: SR 434 & Michael Blake Blvd 604 HCM 6th TWSC 17: SR 434 & Site Access 1 03/27/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.5 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 1344 1367 62 0 73 Future Vol, veh/h 0 1344 1367 62 0 73 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, #- 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 1461 1486 67 0 79 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All - 0 - 0 - 777 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - - - - - 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - - 0 340 Stage 1 0 - - - 0 - Stage 2 0 - - - 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - 340 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 18.8 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) - - - 340 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - -0.233 HCM Control Delay (s) - - - 18.8 HCM Lane LOS - - - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - - 0.9 605 HCM 2010 TWSC 3: Michael Blake Blvd & Site Access 2 03/27/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.8 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 158 205 52 152 9 Future Vol, veh/h 7 158 205 52 152 9 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, #0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 8 172 223 57 165 10 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 673 170 175 0 - 0 Stage 1 170 - - - - - Stage 2 503 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5183.3182.218 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver421 874 1401 - - - Stage 1 860 - - - - - Stage 2 607 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver352 874 1401 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver352 - - - - - Stage 1 719 - - - - - Stage 2 607 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s10.6 6.4 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1401 - 822 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.159 -0.218 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.1 0 10.6 - - HCM Lane LOS A A B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 - 0.8 - - 606 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: SR 434 & Doran Dr 03/27/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 11 1674 16 13 1530 7 7 0 9 8 2 35 Future Volume (vph) 11 1674 16 13 1530 7 7 0 9 8 2 35 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 330 0 365 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 50 50 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.999 0.999 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.962 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 3502 0 1805 3502 0 0 1805 1615 0 1680 1429 Flt Permitted 0.131 0.107 0.751 0.764 Satd. Flow (perm) 249 3502 0 203 3502 0 0 1427 1615 0 1334 1429 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 1 110 70 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 1139 1456 348 488 Travel Time (s) 17.3 22.1 9.5 13.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 3% 0% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 11% 0% 13% Adj. Flow (vph) 12 1762 17 14 1611 7 7 0 9 8 2 37 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 12 1779 0 14 1618 0 0 7 9 0 10 37 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 45 45 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 7 4 607 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: SR 434 & Doran Dr 03/27/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Permitted Phases 2 6 8 8 4 4 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 8 8 8 7 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 15.0 6.0 15.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 15.0 33.8 13.6 37.8 16.1 16.1 16.1 14.0 32.0 32.0 Total Split (s) 24.0 115.0 18.0 109.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 18.0 37.0 37.0 Total Split (%) 14.1% 67.6% 10.6% 64.1% 11.2% 11.2% 11.2% 10.6% 21.8% 21.8% Maximum Green (s) 16.8 108.2 10.9 102.2 11.8 11.8 11.8 11.7 29.8 29.8 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 All-Red Time (s) 2.4 2.0 2.3 2.0 3.8 3.8 3.8 2.9 3.8 3.8 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.2 6.8 7.1 6.8 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max None Max None None None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 19.0 19.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 32.0 32.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 147.7 147.1 147.8 147.0 8.1 8.1 8.1 8.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.86 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.04 0.59 0.06 0.53 0.10 0.05 0.16 0.28 Control Delay 2.0 5.6 2.6 4.6 80.9 0.6 83.6 6.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 2.0 5.6 2.6 4.6 80.9 0.6 83.6 6.3 LOS A A A A F A F A Approach Delay 5.6 4.6 35.7 22.8 Approach LOS A A D C 90th %ile Green (s) 6.0 134.4 6.0 134.3 8.5 8.5 8.5 0.0 8.5 8.5 90th %ile Term Code Min Coord Min Coord Hold Hold Hold Skip Gap Gap 70th %ile Green (s) 6.0 134.9 6.0 134.8 8.0 8.0 8.0 0.0 8.0 8.0 70th %ile Term Code Min Coord Min Coord Min Min Min Skip Min Min 50th %ile Green (s) 0.0 148.0 0.0 148.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 0.0 8.0 8.0 50th %ile Term Code Skip Coord Skip Coord Min Min Min Skip Min Min 30th %ile Green (s) 0.0 148.0 0.0 148.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 0.0 8.0 8.0 30th %ile Term Code Skip Coord Skip Coord Hold Hold Hold Skip Min Min 10th %ile Green (s) 0.0 163.2 0.0 163.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10th %ile Term Code Skip Coord Skip Coord Skip Skip Skip Skip Skip Skip Queue Length 50th (ft) 1 211 2 101 8 0 11 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 4 443 m4 266 26 0 34 5 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1059 1376 268 408 Turn Bay Length (ft) 330 365 Base Capacity (vph) 374 3029 281 3028 99 214 233 308 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.03 0.59 0.05 0.53 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.12 Intersection Summary 608 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: SR 434 & Doran Dr 03/27/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 170 Actuated Cycle Length: 170 Offset: 114 (67%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 105 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.59 Intersection Signal Delay: 5.5 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 14: SR 434 & Doran Dr 609 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 8: Tuskawilla Rd & SR 434 03/27/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 52 1180 514 226 1084 89 516 135 188 126 158 0 Future Volume (vph) 52 1180 514 226 1084 89 516 135 188 126 158 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 315 450 370 0 525 0 150 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 50 50 100 50 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.989 0.913 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 3505 1599 1787 3498 0 3400 1735 0 1752 1881 0 Flt Permitted 0.120 0.061 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 217 3505 1599 115 3498 0 3400 1735 0 1752 1881 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 408 6 36 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 30 Link Distance (ft) 1456 435 3056 544 Travel Time (s) 22.1 6.6 46.3 12.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 3% 1% 1% 2% 3% 3% 0% 0% 3% 1% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) 54 1229 535 235 1129 93 538 141 196 131 165 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 54 1229 535 235 1222 0 538 337 0 131 165 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 45 32 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt NAcustom pm+pt NA Split NA Split NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 4 4 610 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 8: Tuskawilla Rd & SR 434 03/27/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Permitted Phases 2 8 6 Detector Phase 5 2 8 1 6 8 8 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 15.0 6.0 6.0 15.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 13.3 50.0 40.0 13.8 34.9 40.0 40.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 18.0 77.0 40.0 23.0 82.0 40.0 40.0 30.0 30.0 Total Split (%) 10.6% 45.3% 23.5% 13.5% 48.2% 23.5% 23.5% 17.6% 17.6% Maximum Green (s) 10.7 70.1 31.3 15.6 75.1 31.3 31.3 22.5 22.5 Yellow Time (s) 4.9 4.9 4.8 4.8 4.9 4.8 4.8 3.4 3.4 All-Red Time (s) 2.4 2.0 3.9 2.6 2.0 3.9 3.9 4.1 4.1 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.3 6.9 8.7 7.4 6.9 8.7 8.7 7.5 7.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max None None Max None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 33.0 41.0 21.0 41.0 41.0 40.0 40.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 77.7 70.1 33.8 93.0 81.3 33.8 33.8 19.2 19.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.46 0.41 0.20 0.55 0.48 0.20 0.20 0.11 0.11 v/c Ratio 0.32 0.85 0.83 1.05 0.73 0.80 0.90 0.66 0.78 Control Delay 25.0 49.1 28.8 117.5 39.7 74.7 86.2 88.2 97.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 25.0 49.1 28.8 117.5 40.3 74.7 86.2 88.2 97.2 LOS C D C F D E F F F Approach Delay 42.4 52.8 79.1 93.2 Approach LOS D D E F 90th %ile Green (s) 10.1 70.1 31.3 15.6 75.7 31.3 31.3 22.5 22.5 90th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Max Max Coord Max Max Max Max 70th %ile Green (s) 8.8 70.1 31.3 15.6 77.0 31.3 31.3 22.5 22.5 70th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Max Max Coord Max Max Max Max 50th %ile Green (s) 8.0 70.1 33.7 15.6 77.8 33.7 33.7 20.1 20.1 50th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Max Max Coord Max Max Gap Gap 30th %ile Green (s) 7.1 70.1 36.4 15.6 78.7 36.4 36.4 17.4 17.4 30th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Max Max Coord Max Max Gap Gap 10th %ile Green (s) 0.0 70.1 36.1 19.9 97.4 36.1 36.1 13.4 13.4 10th %ile Term Code Skip Coord Gap Max Coord Gap Gap Gap Gap Queue Length 50th (ft) 28 650 199 ~232 588 298 336 142 181 Queue Length 95th (ft) m54 575 #434 #424 695 #392 #552 217 265 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1376 355 2976 464 Turn Bay Length (ft) 315 450 370 525 150 Base Capacity (vph) 197 1445 644 224 1676 675 373 231 248 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 173 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.27 0.85 0.83 1.05 0.81 0.80 0.90 0.57 0.67 Intersection Summary 611 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 8: Tuskawilla Rd & SR 434 03/27/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 170 Actuated Cycle Length: 170 Offset: 77 (45%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 135 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.05 Intersection Signal Delay: 56.4 Intersection LOS: E Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.2% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 8: Tuskawilla Rd & SR 434 612 HCM 6th TWSC Projected Traffic Volumes 6: SR 434 & Michael Blake Blvd P.M. Peak Hour TPD, Inc.Synchro 9 Report 03/27/2019 Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 205 1360 13 38 1335 77 8 3 25 99 5 76 Future Vol, veh/h 205 1360 13 38 1335 77 8 3 25 99 5 76 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 330 - - 0 - - - - 0 - - 100 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 93 93 92 92 93 93 92 92 92 93 92 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 3 2 2 2 17 2 2 2 0 2 0 Mvmt Flow 220 1462 14 41 1435 83 9 3 27 106 5 82 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1518 0 0 1476 0 0 2711 3509 738 2732 3475 759 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1909 1909 - 1559 1559 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 802 1600 - 1173 1916 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.5 6.54 6.9 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.5 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.5 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.5 4.02 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 446 - - 452 - - 10 6 360 ~ 10 6 353 Stage 1 - - - - - - 70 115 - 120 172 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 344 164 - 207 114 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 446 - - 452 - - - ~ 3 360 - ~ 3 353 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - ~ 3 - - ~ 3 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 35 58 - ~ 61 156 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 232 149 - ~ 92 58 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 2.7 0.4 HCM LOS - - Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) - 360 446 - - 452 - - - 353 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.075 0.494 - - 0.091 - - - 0.232 HCM Control Delay (s) - 15.8 20.7 - - 13.8 - - - 18.2 HCM Lane LOS - C C - - B - - - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.2 2.7 - - 0.3 - - - 0.9 Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 613 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: SR 434 & Michael Blake Blvd 03/27/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 205 1360 13 38 1335 77 8 3 25 99 5 76 Future Volume (vph) 205 1360 13 38 1335 77 8 3 25 99 5 76 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 330 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 50 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.999 0.992 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.964 0.954 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 3502 0 1770 3483 0 0 1796 1583 0 1811 1615 Flt Permitted 0.043 0.103 0.849 0.727 Satd. Flow (perm) 82 3502 0 192 3483 0 0 1581 1583 0 1380 1615 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 1 4 127 127 Link Speed (mph) 50 50 30 25 Link Distance (ft) 441 1255 478 628 Travel Time (s) 6.0 17.1 10.9 17.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.92 0.93 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 3% 2% 2% 2% 17% 2% 2% 2% 0% 2% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) 220 1462 14 41 1435 83 9 3 27 106 5 82 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 220 1476 0 41 1518 0 0 12 27 0 111 82 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 32 32 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 614 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: SR 434 & Michael Blake Blvd 03/27/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Permitted Phases 2 6 8 8 4 4 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 3 8 8 7 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 15.0 6.0 15.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 22.0 12.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 28.0 28.0 Total Split (s) 39.0 92.0 29.0 82.0 29.0 30.0 30.0 29.0 30.0 30.0 Total Split (%) 21.7% 51.1% 16.1% 45.6% 16.1% 16.7% 16.7% 16.1% 16.7% 16.7% Maximum Green (s) 33.0 86.0 23.0 76.0 23.0 24.0 24.0 23.0 24.0 24.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max None Max None None None None Max Max Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 115.0 104.2 94.1 86.9 53.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.64 0.58 0.52 0.48 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 v/c Ratio 0.83 0.73 0.25 0.90 0.03 0.05 0.27 0.15 Control Delay 78.4 30.9 18.3 51.4 45.5 0.2 51.0 1.3 Queue Delay 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 78.4 33.4 18.3 51.4 45.5 0.2 51.0 1.3 LOS E C B D D A D A Approach Delay 39.2 50.5 14.1 29.9 Approach LOS D D B C 90th %ile Green (s) 30.9 100.0 9.0 78.1 0.0 53.0 53.0 0.0 53.0 53.0 90th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Gap Coord Skip Hold Hold Skip MaxR MaxR 70th %ile Green (s) 25.8 101.4 7.6 83.2 0.0 53.0 53.0 0.0 53.0 53.0 70th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Gap Coord Skip Hold Hold Skip MaxR MaxR 50th %ile Green (s) 22.2 102.0 7.0 86.8 0.0 53.0 53.0 0.0 53.0 53.0 50th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Gap Coord Skip Hold Hold Skip MaxR MaxR 30th %ile Green (s) 18.5 102.6 6.4 90.5 0.0 53.0 53.0 0.0 53.0 53.0 30th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Gap Coord Skip Hold Hold Skip MaxR MaxR 10th %ile Green (s) 13.3 115.0 0.0 95.7 0.0 53.0 53.0 0.0 53.0 53.0 10th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Skip Coord Skip Hold Hold Skip MaxR MaxR Queue Length 50th (ft) 204 671 17 855 10 0 102 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 294 781 34 #1117 28 0 163 6 Internal Link Dist (ft) 361 1175 398 548 Turn Bay Length (ft) 330 100 Base Capacity (vph) 368 2027 317 1682 465 555 406 565 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 408 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.60 0.91 0.13 0.90 0.03 0.05 0.27 0.15 Intersection Summary 615 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: SR 434 & Michael Blake Blvd 03/27/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 125 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.90 Intersection Signal Delay: 43.5 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.1% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 6: SR 434 & Michael Blake Blvd 616 HCM 6th TWSC 17: SR 434 & Site Access 1 03/27/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 1551 1372 47 0 50 Future Vol, veh/h 0 1551 1372 47 0 50 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, #- 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 1686 1491 51 0 54 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All - 0 - 0 - 771 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - - - - - 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - - 0 343 Stage 1 0 - - - 0 - Stage 2 0 - - - 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - 343 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 17.5 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) - - - 343 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - -0.158 HCM Control Delay (s) - - - 17.5 HCM Lane LOS - - - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - - 0.6 617 HCM 6th TWSC 3: Michael Blake Blvd & Site Access 2 03/27/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.4 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 115 124 160 64 6 Future Vol, veh/h 6 115 124 160 64 6 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, #0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 7 125 135 174 70 7 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 518 74 77 0 - 0 Stage 1 74 - - - - - Stage 2 444 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5183.3182.218 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver518 988 1522 - - - Stage 1 949 - - - - - Stage 2 646 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver467 988 1522 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver467 - - - - - Stage 1 856 - - - - - Stage 2 646 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s9.5 3.3 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1522 - 936 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.089 -0.141 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.6 0 9.5 - - HCM Lane LOS A A A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 - 0.5 - - 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 Grant Maloy, Clerk Of The Circuit Court& Comptroller Seminole County, FL Inst#2020134811 Book:9768 Page:969-980; (12 PAGES) RCD: 11/23/2020 8:25:06 AM REC FEE $103.50 t' THIS INSTRUMENT WAS PREPARED BY AND SHOULD BE RETURNED TO: Anthony A.Garganese City Attorney of Winter Springs Garganese,Weiss,D'Agresta& Salzman,P.A. 111 N.Orange Avenue,Suite 2000 Orlando,FL 32802 407)425-9566 FOR RECORDING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT JDBS Winter Springs,LLC (Chase Bank Conditional Use) THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and executed this /(0/ day of ILkdJ 1YA 2020, by and between the CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, a Florida Municipal Corporation ("City"), whose address is 1126 East S.R. 434, Winter Springs, Florida 32708, and JDBS WINTER SPRINGS, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, whose address is 10931 N Dale Mabry Hwy, Tampa, Florida 32618-4112. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer is the owner of approximately 0.70 acres, more or less, of real property located in the Winter Springs Town Center, T5 Transect, generally west of the intersection of Eagle Edge Lane and SR 434, Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida, more particularly described herein("Property"); and WHEREAS, Developer has applied for a conditional use of a financial institution or bank in order to construct a local branch of Chase Bank with a drive-through on the Property; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 20 Zoning, Article II, Division 1, Section 20-29.1 of the Winter Springs City Code ("City Code"), a community workshop for the Project was held on February 20,2020; and WHEREAS, Section 20-29(c) of the City Code requires that all conditional uses shall be binding on the use of the subject property and, further,that as a condition of approval by the City Commission, all development projects requiring a community workshop pursuant to Section 20- 29(c) of the City Code shall be required to be memorialized in a binding development agreement; and DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and JDBS Winter Springs,LLC(Chase Bank Conditional Use) Page 1 of 11 741 Book 9768 Page 970 Instrument#2020134811 WHEREAS,this Development Agreement shall be recorded against the property so that the terms and conditions of approval related to the Project shall run with the land; and NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein,the parties mutually agree as follows: 1.0 Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated herein by this reference. 2.0 Authority. This Agreement is entered into pursuant to the Florida Municipal Home Rule Powers Act. 3.0 The Property. The real property subject to this Agreement has a tax parcel identification number of 06-21-31-507-0000-0010 and is legally described in EXHIBIT "A", attached hereto and fully incorporated herein by this reference ("Property"). 4.0 Project Description and Requirements. Developer may, at its expense, design, permit and construct a local branch of Chase Bank with a drive-through, located in the City of Winter Springs Town Center. If constructed, the bank building and all public and private project infrastructure shall be constructed in a single phase. Hereinafter the project description and requirements are referred to as the "Project". Nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted to impose an affirmative obligation upon the Developer to construct the Project, but should the Developer construct the Project, it shall do so in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. The Developer shall construct the Project in a manner consistent with the approved Conceptual Sketch attached hereto as EXHIBIT `B", which is fully incorporated herein by this reference. The Conceptual Sketch is intended to be the general blueprint which details key aspects of the future physical development of the Property. The Conceptual Sketch shall also serve as a necessary guide for future permit applications and permitting necessary to complete the construction of the Project. Developer shall have the obligation to further submit and obtain the City's approval of a final site plan and final engineering plans ("Final Engineering Plans") consistent with the Conceptual Sketch in all material respects and in compliance with the City Code. Developer acknowledges and agrees that the Conceptual Sketch was not created with specific surveyed dimensions and that during the Preliminary Site Plan and Final Engineering Plan process such dimensions shall be surveyed, duly engineered, and provided to the City for consideration under applicable City Codes. The Conceptual Sketch shall be subject to reasonable adjustments at the Final Engineering Plan phase in order to bring the Project into full compliance with the City Code, and as a result, the exact location, layout and dimensions of the building, landscaping, entrances, utilities, parking and other site improvements may vary slightly between approval of the Conceptual Sketch and approval of the Preliminary Site Plan and Final Engineering Plans. These changes shall be allowed as long as the changes are consistent with the development standards noted in this Agreement and preserve the general character of the development shown on the Conceptual Sketch. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and JDBS Winter Springs,LLC(Chase Bank Conditional Use) Page 2 of 11 742 Book 9768 Page 971 Instrument#2020134811 Specific conditions of approval for the conditional use include the following,which are also addressed in the City's staff report: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and JDBS Winter Springs,LLC(Chase Bank Conditional Use) Page 3 of 11 743 Book 9768 Page 972 Instrument#2020134811 The Developer's Conceptual Sketch, as shown in EXHIBIT B, includes a common driveway access with the adjacent parcel, which will be constructed to straddle the Property's eastern property line. The adjacent parcel is intended to be a future Wendy's fast food restaurant, which itself is the subject of a certain Development Agreement recorded in the Official Records of Seminole County at Book 9538, Pages 745-755 ("Adjacent Parcel"). Therefore, the Developer has provided an executed Declaration of Covenants, Restricts and Reciprocal Easements Agreement, recorded in the Official Records of Seminole County at Book 9354, Pages 127-163, on May 14, 2019 ("Declaration"), which includes an easement for reciprocal ingress and egress between the Property and the Adjacent Parcel ("Access Easement"). Should the parties ever mutually desire to terminate the Access Easement set forth in the Declaration, prior to executing such termination, the parties shall be required to seek and receive consent from the City of Winter Springs and obtain an amendment to the future site plan and final engineering plans. There shall be no retail sales of alcohol and no retail sales, manufacturing, or compounding of any products derived from the hemp plant or cannabis plant, including CBD cannabidiol). 5.0 Future Permitting. Developer shall be required to, at minimum, receive final engineering and site plan approval and aesthetic plan approval prior to receiving any building permit for the Project. In accordance with Section 20-36 of the City Code, the conditional use shall expire two (2) years after the Effective Date of this Agreement unless a building permit based upon and incorporating the conditional use is issued by the city within such two (2) years. The conditional use shall expire two and one-half (2 1/2) years after the Effective Date of this Agreement unless the Developer has substantially commenced vertical construction of buildings, which shall at minimum include building foundations, within such two and one-half(2 %2)years. 6.0 Representations of the Parties. The City and Developer hereby each represent and warrant to the other that it has the power and authority to execute, deliver and perform the terms and provisions of this Agreement and has taken all necessary action to authorize the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement. This Agreement will, when duly executed and delivered by the City and Developer, constitute a legal, valid and binding obligation enforceable against the parties hereto. Upon recording of this Agreement in the Public Records of Seminole County, Florida, the Agreement shall be a binding obligation upon the Property in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Developer represents that it has voluntarily and willfully executed this Agreement for purposes of binding himself and the Property to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. 7.0 Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall automatically be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the City and Developer and their respective successors and assigns. The terms and conditions of this Agreement similarly shall be binding upon the Property, and shall run with title to the same upon being duly recorded against the Property by the City. 8.0 Applicable Law: Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and JDBS Winter Springs,LLC(Chase Bank Conditional Use) Page 4 of 11 744 Book 9768 Page 973 Instrument#2020134811 accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. The venue of any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be in Seminole County,Florida or,for federal court actions, in Orlando, Florida. 9.0 Amendments. This Agreement shall not be modified or amended except by written agreement duly executed by both parties hereto (or their successors or assigns) and approved by the City Commission. 10.0 Entire Agreement, Exhibits. This Agreement and all attached exhibits hereto supersede any other agreement, oral or written, regarding the Property and contain the entire agreement between the City and Developer as to the subject matter hereof. The Exhibits attached hereto and referenced herein are hereby fully incorporated herein by this reference. 11.0 Severability. If any provision of this Agreement shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable to any extent by a court of competent jurisdiction, the same shall not affect in any respect the validity or enforceability of the remainder of this Agreement. 12.0 Effective Date. This Agreement shall become effective upon approval by the City Commission and execution of this Agreement by both parties hereto. 13.0 Recordation. Upon full execution by the Parties, this Agreement shall be recorded in the Public Records of Seminole County, Florida by the City. The Developer shall be responsible for all recording fees associated with this Agreement. 14.0 Relationship of the Parties. The relationship of the parties to this Agreement is contractual and Developer is an independent contractor and not an agent of the City. Nothing herein shall be deemed to create a joint venture or principal-agent relationship between the parties, and neither party is authorized to, nor shall either party act toward third persons or the public in any manner,which would indicate any such relationship with the other. 15.0 Sovereign Immunity. The City intends to avail itself of sovereign immunity and other applicable limitations on City liability whenever deemed applicable by the City. Therefore, notwithstanding any other provision set forth in this Agreement, nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed as a waiver of the City's right to sovereign immunity under section 768.28, Florida Statutes, or other limitations imposed on the City's potential liability under state or federal law. As such, the City shall not be liable under this Agreement for punitive damages or interest for the period before judgment. Further, the City shall not be liable for any claim or judgment, or portion thereof, to any one person for more than two hundred thousand dollars 200,000.00), or any claim or judgment, or portion thereof, which, when totaled with all other claims or judgments paid by the State or its agencies and subdivisions arising out of the same incident or occurrence, exceeds the sum of three hundred thousand dollars($300,000.00). DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and JDBS Winter Springs,LLC(Chase Bank Conditional Use) Page 5 of 11 745 Book 9768 Page 974 Instrument#2020134811 16.0 City's Police Power. Developer agrees and acknowledges that the City hereby reserves all police powers granted to the City by law. In no way shall this Agreement be construed as the City bargaining away or surrendering its police powers. 17.0 Interpretation. The parties hereby agree and acknowledge that they have both participated equally in the drafting of this Agreement and no party shall be favored or disfavored regarding the interpretation to this Agreement in the event of a dispute between the parties. 18.0 Third-PaIU Rights. This Agreement is not a third-party beneficiary contract and shall not in any way whatsoever create any rights on behalf of any third party. 19.0 Specific Performance. Strict compliance shall be required with each and every provision of this Agreement. The parties agree that failure to perform the obligations provided by this Agreement shall result in irreparable damage and that specific performance of these obligations may be obtained by a suit in equity. 20.0 Attorney's Fees. In connection with any arbitration or litigation arising out of this Agreement, each party shall be responsible for their own attorney's fees and costs. 21.0 Development Permits. Nothing herein shall limit the City's authority to grant or deny any development permit applications or requests subsequent to the Effective Date of this Agreement in accordance with the criteria of the City Code and the requirements of this Agreement. The failure of this Agreement to address any particular City, County, State and/or Federal permit, condition, term or restriction shall not relieve Developer or the City of the necessity of complying with the law governing said permitting requirement, condition, term or restriction. Without imposing any limitation on the City's police powers, the City reserves the right to withhold, suspend or terminate any and all certificates of occupancy for any building, trailer, structure or unit if Developer is in breach of any term and condition of this Agreement. 22.0 Default. Failure by either party to perform each and every one of its obligations hereunder shall constitute a default, entitling the non-defaulting party to pursue whatever remedies are available to it under Florida law or equity including, without limitation, termination of this Agreement, an action for specific performance, and/or injunctive relief. Prior to any party filing any action as a result of a default under this Agreement, the non-defaulting party shall first provide the defaulting party with written notice of said default. Upon receipt of said notice, the defaulting party shall be provided a thirty (30) day opportunity in which to cure the default to the reasonable satisfaction of the non-defaulting party prior to filing said action. 23.0 Termination. In addition to termination as provided in Section 22.0 above, the City shall have the unconditional right, but not obligation, to terminate this Agreement, without notice or penalty, if Developer fails to receive building permits for the Project within two (2) years of the Effective Date of this Agreement. Further, the City shall have the unconditional right, but not obligation, to terminate this Agreement, without notice or penalty, if Developer fails to substantially commence vertical construction of buildings, which shall at minimum include building foundations, within two and one-half(2 '/2 ) years of the Effective Date of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and JDBS Winter Springs,LLC(Chase Bank Conditional Use) Page 6 of 11 746 Book 9768 Page 975 Instrument#2020134811 Agreement. The Developer may apply to the City Commission for an extension of this Agreement, which may be granted upon good cause shown. In addition, the City shall have the right, but not obligation, to terminate the Agreement if Developer permanently abandons construction of the Project, provided, however, the City shall first deliver written notice and an opportunity to cure to the defaulting party as set forth in Section 22.0 above. If the City terminates this Agreement, the City shall record a notice of termination against the Property in the public records of Seminole County,Florida. 24.0 Indemnification and Hold Harmless. Developer shall be solely responsible for designing, permitting, constructing, operating and maintaining this Project. As such, Developer hereby agrees to indemnify, release, and hold harmless the City and its commissioners, employees and attorneys from and against all claims, losses, damages, personal injuries including, but not limited to, death), or liability (including reasonable attorney's fees and costs through all appellate proceedings), directly or indirectly arising from, out of, or caused by Developer and Developer's contractor's and subcontractor's performance of design, permit and construction, and maintenance activities in furtherance of constructing the Project and maintaining the improvements of this Project. This indemnification shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 25.0 Force Majeure. The parties agree that in the event that the failure by either party to accomplish any action required hereunder within a specified time period ("Time Period") constitutes a default under the terms of this Agreement and, if any such failure is due to any unforeseeable or unpredictable event or condition beyond the control of such party, including, but not limited to, acts of God, acts of government authority(other than the City's own acts), acts of public enemy or war, riots, civil disturbances, power failure, shortages of labor or materials, government mandated quarantine or travel bans; government mandated closures, disruption, breakdown, delayed production or interruption for any period of time; interruptions to transportation, or the use of equipment, labor, or materials, including, without limitation, the closure of government buildings, airports, harbors, railroads, or pipelines, or other infrastructure due to worldwide or regional pandemic or other health related event disruptions, injunction or other court proceedings beyond the control of such party, or severe adverse weather conditions Uncontrollable Event"), then, notwithstanding any provision ofthis Agreement to the contrary, that failure shall not constitute a default under this Agreement and any Time Period proscribed hereunder shall be extended by the amount of time that such party was unable to perform solely due to the Uncontrollable Event. The extended time period shall be agreed to in writing by the parties and said agreement shall not be unreasonably withheld by either party. 26. Notice. Whenever either party desires to give notice to the other, notice shall be sent by hand delivery or certified mail,return receipt requested, and shall be sent to: For the City: Shawn Boyle, City Manager City of Winter Springs 1126 East S.R. 434 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and JDBS Winter Springs,LLC(Chase Bank Conditional Use) Page 7 of 11 747 Book 9768 Page 976 Instrument#2020134811 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 With additional notice to: Anthony A. Garganese, City Attorney Garganese, Weiss, D'Agresta& Salzman,P.A. 111 N. Orange Avenue, Suite 2000 Orlando, FL 32802 For Developer: JDBS WINTER SPRINGS, LLC 10931 N. Dale Mabry Hwy., Tampa, FL 33618 Attn: Bryan Schultz Phone: 813 760-2621 b.schultzkoceanbleu rg_oup.com copy to: Graham Legal Group,PLLC 1000 Legion Place, Suite 1200 3208C E. Colonial Drive, Box 292 Orlando,Florida 32803 Attn: Jesse E. Graham, Jr. Phone: 407-230-6449 Email: igraham@grahamleizalgri).com WEN-ACQUISITIONS, LLC 1100 Park Central Blvd. South, Suite 3300 Pompano Beach,FL 33064 Attn: Sauris Lugo/Jhonny Mercado Phone: 561-997-6002 Email: slugogjaerestgroup.com/jmercadogiaerestgroup.com copy to: Raul Gastesi, Esq. Gastesi&Associates, P.A. 8105 NW 155"'Street Miami Lakes,FI. 33016 Phone: 305-801-1292 Email: r asgtesingastesi.com Either party may freely modify their respective contact person and address contained in this Paragraph by providing written notice of the modification to the other party. Any Notice given as provided herein shall be deemed received as follows: if delivered by personal service, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and JDBS Winter Springs,LLC(Chase Bank Conditional Use) Page 8 of 11 748 Book 9768 Page 977 Instrument#2020134811 on the date so delivered; and if mailed, on the third business day after mailing. 27.0 Assignment. Prior to completing the construction of the Project and reaching final build-out of the Project,Developer shall not assign this Agreement without the prior written consent of the City. Such assignment shall also require the written approval of the City by amendment to this Agreement, which shall not require a public hearing and shall not be unreasonably withheld. However, Developer shall be entitled to assign its rights and obligations under this Agreement to: (a) a parent, subsidiary, or affiliated entity in which Developer or its members are members or interest holders, or (b) JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, without City consent, provided that the City is given notice of such assignment in accordance with Section 26.0 herein. Any assignment authorized by this subparagraph shall require the assignee to be a formal signatory to this Agreement and fully assume all of Developer's obligations, commitments, representations, and warranties under this Agreement. In any assignment, the rights and obligations contained herein shall be binding on successors in interest to the Property, and the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and any respective successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have hereunto set their hands and seal on the date first above written. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS By: Charles L cey,Mayo Date: L / ATTEST: By: Christian Gowan,lateFi City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY For the use and reliance ofthe City of Winter Springs, Florida only CITY SEAL By: li bony . Garganese, City Attorney for the City of Winter Springs,Florida DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City ofWinter Springs and JDBS Winter Springs,LLC(Chase Bank Conditional Use) Page 9 of 11 749 Book 9768 Page 978 Instrument#2020134811 Signed, sealed and delivered in the JD B WIN R SPRIN" Cw presence ofthe following witnesses: c Prin and title:_1i 46le Signature of Wit ss Date: 77,31,20z6 o`/1/ cSl Z Printed Name of Witness Signature bfWitness a4 " Printed Name of Witness JOSHUAC HORROCKS STATE OF rL-ok 1flp MY COMMISSION#GG 055965 Na o EXPIRES:January 17,2021COUNTYOF #1 LLS J8Q9& C.# 9lFOF F°Bonded Thru Budget Notary Services The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of ()physical presence or( .....) online notarization,this 31 day of J OLLI 2020, by jos6Pµ-bi 6t72t- AW6, the M412 of JDBS Winter 8prings, LLC, a limited liability company, on behalf of the company, who is sonally known me or produced as identification. DEVELOPER IS HEREBY ADVISED THAT SHOULD DEVELOPER FAIL TO FULLY EXECUTE, AND DELIVER TO THE CITY, THIS AGREEMENT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE DATE THAT THE CITY COMMISSION APPROVES THIS AGREEMENT, THIS AGREEMENT, AND THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPROVALS REFERENCED HEREUNDER, SHALL AUTOMATICALLY BE DEEMED NULL AND VOID. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and JDBS Winter Springs,LLC(Chase Bank Conditional Use) Page 10 of 11 750 Book 9768 Page 979 Instrument#2020134811 EXHIBIT A PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 1, WSTC OCEAN BLEU. ACCORDING TO .THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF. AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 84, PACES 37 AND 38, PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and JDBS Winter Springs,LLC(Chase Bank Conditional Use) Page 10 of 11 751 Book 9768 Page 980 Instrument#2020134811 EXHIBIT B CONCEPTUAL SKETCH 3 ti SS i tr gg jr,Via'.. s Lil2.3IIiZP..5 EtY{1d' r fs I ii P1 AS lni, q t45.td jjMq gp a Y. t { 3': 3 # s! JY t -k' k I •.+ y S,.. t, v E v S Rts DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and JDBS Winter Springs,LLC(Chase Bank Conditional Use) Page 11 of 11 752 kimley-horn.com 100 2nd Avenue South, Suite 105N, St. Petersburg, FL 33701 727 547 3999 STORMWATER NARRATIVE To: City of Winter Springs Public Works 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, FL 32708 From: Dawn M. Dodge, P.E. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 100 2nd Avenue South, Suite #105N, St. Petersburg, FL 33701 Date: January 27, 2021 Subject: Chase Bank – SR 434 and Tuskawilla Winter Springs Town Center – PH2 Commercial To whom it may concern: The proposed project is located on Lot 1 within Winter Springs Town Center. The master stormwater management system for this site was permitted under SJRWMD Permit No. 95027-2. The original permit allowed the construction of a ±38‐acre mixed-use development, which included the construction of the master stormwater management system which was designed to provide treatment and attenuation for ±30 acres of impervious area for the entire development. Our project consists of the construction of a 3,122 SF building and associated sidewalks, parking and utilities. The project proposes 0.48 acres of impervious area and 0.23 acres of pervious area. The stormwater runoff will be conveyed to the master stormwater system. The master stormwater system accounts for a maximum allowable impervious area of 80%. Lot 1 is a total of 0.70 acres therefore the maximum allowable impervious area is 0.56 acres. The project proposes (0.08 acres) less impervious area than the maximum allowable. This letter is requesting authorization to construct the additional impervious area within Lot 1 per the enclosed Civil Construction Plans. Attached are excerpts from the Winter Springs Town Center Phase II Stormwater Report prepared by Lochrane Engineering, Inc. to show that the stormwater quality and quantity for the proposed Chase Bank is provided by the master drainage system. If you have any questions, I can be reached directly by email at dawn.dodge@kimley-horn.com. Sincerely, Dawn M. Dodge, PE #76221 753 Stoimwater Report - Winter Springs Town Center Phase II 4/1/2004 LEL Pmject Number 03067.20 Proposed Land Use For storm sewer modeling, the proposed site was divided into 16 separate drainage areas. The impervious area was calculated for building area drainage basins with a known proposed layout (Building "A", Building "B"). In the building area drainage areas where the layout is unknown, an assumption of 80% impervious area was used. The proposed street cross-sections were used to calculate the impervious area of the street drainage basins. Table IV.1 below lists the impervious areas used in the ICPR3 model. K:\CIV!L\03067\03067.20 PHASE I1\Admin Files\03061 StormReport.doc 6 Table IV.1 Imenious Areas Basin Impervious Area (ac) Open Space (at) Total Area (at) Street "A" 4.520 (75.0%) 1.505 (25.0%) 6.025 Street "B" 4.035 (75.0%) 1.345 (25.0%) 5.380 Street "C" 5.973 (75.0%) 1.991 (25.0%) 7.964 Building "A" 1.770 (84.2%) 0.33 1 (15.8%) 2.101 Building "B" 2.544 (86.6%) 0.394 (13.4%) 2.938 Building "C" 1.584 (80.0%) 0.396 (20.0%) 1.980 Building "D" 3.241 (80.0%) 0.810 (20.0%) 4.051 Building "E" 1.421 (80.0%) 0.355 (20.0%) 1.776 Building "F" 3.112 (80.0%) 0.778 (20.0%) 3.890 Building "0" 0.649 (80.0%) 0.162 (20.0%) 0.811 Building "H" 0.637 (80.0%) 0.159 (20.0%) 0.796 Building "I" 0.878 (80.0%) 0.220 (20.0%) 1.098 Building "J" 0.373 (80.0%) 0.093 (20.0%) 0.466 Amp 1.306 (80.0%) 0.326 (20.0%) 1.632 Rest 0.864 (75.0%) 0.288 (25.0%) 1.152 Trail 0.646 (65.0%) 0.348 (35.0%) 0.994 Totals 33.552 (77.9%) 9.502 (22.1%) 43.054 754 I 'a -4- a I U I It ' ri C 11 I I I I I I I I I II 1ET t t$19'j £"t" 2 ( U U. _ 'p S I "III 'U S 755 McDONALDS S.R. 434SANWATER S.R. 434 MICHAEL BLAKE BLVD.PEDESTRIAN TRAIL TREE SWALLOW ROADPERIMROADETER UP UP 1'-9 "6'-0" 1'-9 "UPUPGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEUPUPGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEUPUPUPUPUPUPUP UP UPUPPOOL T T T T T T T T T T T 600 400500 200 900 300 1000 100 700 800 T T T T T T T T T T UPUPGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGE38 38 39 40 38 39 40 38 39383938 38 38394041 40 40 4026 22 24 38373940363535343332333434 3433323130292829301718192021 27 2823 16 25 25262728 28 27 LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SILT FENCE SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFLIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SILT FENCE FOR CONTINUATION OF ERROSION CONTROL MEASURES SEE SWALE AND STORMWATER POND SHEETS IP1 IP1 IP2 IP2 IP1 IP2 IP2 IP2 IP2 IP2 IP2 IP2 IP2 IP2 IP2 IP2 IP2 IP1 IP1 IP1 IP1 IP1 IP1 IP1 IP1 IP1 SFSFSF SF SF SF SF SF SF IP2 SILT FENCE SILT FENCE IP2 IP2 IP2 IP2 CE 20'75'LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SILT FENCE SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SFSFSFSFLIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SILT FENCE IP1IP1 IP1 B IP2 IP2 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP2 IP2 IP2 IP2 IP1 IP2IP1 IP1 IP2 SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFLIMITS OF DISTURBANCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF S F S F S F SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFFORREVISIONSDATENO.SHEET DESIGNER:PRJ. MGR:JOB #:CHECKED:ENGINEER ENGINEER:RECORD DRAWINGTHIS RECORD DRAWING IS BASED ON THE RESULTS OF LIMITEDPERIODIC FIELD OBSERVATIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION, AREVIEW OF CONTRACTOR FURNISHED REDLINED PLANSINDICATING CHANGES INCORPORATED DURING CONSTRUCTION,AND WITNESSED UTILITY TESTING OF DRINKING WATER ANDWASTEWATER SYSTEMS. ALTHOUGH THE ACCURACY CAN NOTBE GUARANTEED, THE ENGINEER BELIEVES THIS RECORDDRAWING IS CORRECT TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE.FL LIC. # ATDATE: Nov. 19, 2015FRANK A. PORTER, P.E.FL. LIC. #69092SWPPP PHASE 2PLANC4.0 RJLRIDFAP13034WINTER SPRINGS APARTMENTS201 MICHAEL BLAKE BLVDWINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDAIBEW PENSION FUND / WINTER SPRINGS HOLDINGS100500 SCALE: 1" = 50' N O R T H EROSION DETAILS LEGEND TEMPORARY SILT FENCE WITH WIRE SUPPORT (SEE DETAIL 5, SHEET C5.0) CURB INLET PROTECTION (SEE DETAIL 3, SHEET C5.0) PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE IP1 SF CE SF 3. MAINTENANCE: 1.SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSPECTED AT LEAST WEEKLY. ANY REQUIRED REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY. SEDIMENT DEPOSITS SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN THEY REACH APPROXIMATELY ONE-HALF THE HEIGHT OF THE BARRIER. 2.INLETS SHALL BE INSPECTED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH RAIN EVENT AND ANY REPAIRS SHALL BE PERFORMED IMMEDIATELY. 3.BARE AREAS OF THE SITE THAT WERE PREVIOUSLY SEEDED SHALL BE RE-SEEDED PER MANUFACTURES' INSTRUCTIONS. 4.MULCH AND SOD THAT HAS BEEN WASHED OUT SHALL BE REPLACED IMMEDIATELY. ALL MEASURES ON THIS SITE MAP, AND IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN, SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN FULLY FUNCTIONAL CONDITION UNTIL NO LONGER REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETED PHASE OF WORK OR FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE. CONTROLS ARE TO BE REPLACED OR REPAIRED IF IN A SUBSTANDARD CONDITION. ALL MAINTENANCE MODIFICATIONS ARE TO BE NOTED, ON PLANS, AS THEY OCCUR. 4. INSPECTIONS: A QUALIFIED INSPECTOR SHALL INSPECT ALL POINTS OF DISCHARGE INTO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE OR AND MS4 (CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS); DISTURBED AREAS OF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE THAT HAVE NOT BEEN FINALLY STABILIZED; AREAS USED FOR STORAGE OF MATERIALS THAT ARE EXPOSED TO PRECIPITATION; STRUCTURAL CONTROLS; AND, LOCATIONS WHERE VEHICLES ENTER OR EXIT THE SITE, AT LEAST ONCE EVERY SEVEN CALENDAR DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF THE END OF A STORM THAT IS 0.50 INCHES OR GREATER. A REPORT SUMMARIZING THE SCOPE OF THE INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE AND RETAINED IN THE CONSTRUCTION TRAILER AS PART OF THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION 5. NON-STORMWATER DISCHARGES: IT IS ANTICIPATED THAT THE FOLLOWING NON-STORMWATER DISCHARGES MAY OCCUR FROM THE SITE DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD: 1.WATER FROM LINE FLUSHINGS 2.PAVEMENT WASH WATER (WHERE NO SPILLS OR LEAKS OF TOXIC OR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HAVE OCCURRED) 3.SITE WATERING, TO ALLEVIATE FUGATIVE DUST 4.ROUTINE EXTERNAL BUILDING WASHDOWN WHICH DOES NOT USE DETERGENTS 5.IRRIGATION DRAINAGE IF SAID DISCHARGES DO OCCUR, THEY WILL BE DIRECTED TO THE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES PRIOR TO DISCHARGE 6. CONTRACTOR/SUBCONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION: ALL CONTRACTOR(S) AND SUBCONTRACTOR(S) IDENTIFIED ABOVE MUST SIGN THE FOLLOWING CERTIFICATION: "I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF LAW THAT I UNDERSTAND, AND SHALL COMPLY WITH, THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA GENERIC PERMIT FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGE FROM LARGE AND SMALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND THIS STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN PREPARED THEREUNDER." BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES SEQUENCE 1. SITE DESCRIPTION A. CONSTRUCTION OF 10 MULTIFAMILY APARTMENT BUILDINGS, PUBLIC ROADS, AND SURFACE PARKING AREAS. B. SEQUENCE OF SOIL DISTURBANCE: (1) INSTALL PERIMETER SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROLS. (2) PREPARE SITE. (3) CLEAR AND GRUB PROPOSED AREA. (4) INSTALL PROPOSED UNDERGROUND STORMWATER AND UTILITIES. (5) INSTALL CONCRETE CURB, CONCRETE SIDEWALK. AND PAVEMENT (6) STABILIZE SITE. C.TOTAL SITE AREA:12.4± ACRES DISTURBED SITE AREA:12.4± ACRES D. SOILS: THE SOILS (PER NRCS) POMELLO, ST JOHNS/EAUGALLIE E. DRAINAGE AREA FOR EXISTING DISCHARGE POINT:16.2± ACRES DRAINAGE AREA FOR PROPOSED DISCHARGE POINT:16.2± ACRES F.LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE OF EXISTING DISCHARGE POINT: DISCHARGE POINT LAT:28° 41' 43.8" N DISCHARGE POINT LONG:81°15' 32.1" W DISCHARGES TO EXISTING WETLANDS LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE OF PROPOSED DISCHARGE POINT: DISCHARGE POINT LAT:28° 41' 43.8" N DISCHARGE POINT LONG:81°15' 32.1" W DISCHARGES TO EXISTING WETLANDS 2. CONTROLS A. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS: (1) STABILIZATION PRACTICES: 1.TEMPORARY SEEDING SHALL BE RYE GRASS APPLIED AT MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS TO ANY DISTURBED AREAS THAT ARE INACTIVE FOR SEVEN DAYS. 2.MULCHING PRACTICES AND SOD SHALL BE APPLIED TO PARKING LOT ISLANDS. (2) STRUCTURAL PRACTICES: 1.PRIOR TO CLEARING, A SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE SITE, AS SHOWN HEREIN. 2.DURING THE CLEARING, GRUBBING, AND SITE GRADING STAGES, AREAS TO BE LEFT DISTURBED MORE THAN 7 DAYS SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH RYE GRASS APPLIED PER THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. AFTER SEEDING, EACH AREA SHALL BE MULCHED WITH 4,000 POUNDS OF STRAW PER ACRE. 3.AFTER ALL INITIAL SITE GRADING WORK, ALL PROPOSED INLETS/OUTFALLS, ONCE INSTALLED, SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM EROSION AND SEDIMENT RUNOFF BY THE USE OF THE INLET PROTECTION DESIGNATED ON THE SITE MAP. DISTURBED PORTIONS OF THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES HAVE PERMANENTLY CEASED SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH SEED OR SOD AS INDICATED ON THE SITE MAP NO LATER THAN 14 DAYS AFTER THE LAST CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. SEEDING SHALL BE THE SAME AS IN TEMPORARY SEEDING. 4.ALL INSTALLATION SHALL BE COMMENCED AS DEPICTED ON THE SITE MAPS AND EROSION CONTROL DETAIL SHEET. 5.IF SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES DEVIATE FROM THE PLANS THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS SHALL BE NOTIFIED. B. PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CONTROLS: 1.CATCH BASINS AND STORM SEWER SYSTEM ON-SITE TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE OF THE ENTIRE SITE TO THE DISCHARGE POINT. C. CONTROLS FOR OTHER POLLUTANTS: 1.WASTE DISPOSAL: ALL WASTE WILL BE DISPOSED OF IN AN APPROPRIATE LEGAL MANOR, AND COMPLY WITH CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS ORDINANCES FOR WASTE DISPOSAL AND COMMERCIAL SITE DEVELOPMENT. 2.VEHICLE TRACKING: OFF SITE VEHICLE TRACKING OF SEDIMENTS AND DUST GENERATION WILL BE MINIMIZED VIA BEST POSSIBLE PRACTICES, DAILY SWEEPING AND THE USE OF WATER TO KEEP DUST DOWN. 3.FERTILIZERS, HERBICIDES, AND PESTICIDES: FERTILIZERS AND PESTICIDES WILL BE USED AT A MINIMUM AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURERS' SUGGESTED APPLICATION APPLICATION RATES. THE FERTILIZERS AND PESTICIDES SHALL BE STORED IN A COVERED SHED. 4.TOXIC SUBSTANCES: ALL PAINTS AND OTHER CHEMICALS WILL BE STORED IN A LOCKED COVERED SHED. 5.OTHER: PORT-O-LETS WILL BE PLACED AWAY FROM THE STORM SEWER SYSTEMS AND STORM INLETS. NO VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHALL BE CONDUCTED ON-SITE. A WASHDOWN AREA SHALL BE DESIGNATED AT ALL TIMES AND WILL NOT BE LOCATED IN ANY AREA THAT WILL ALLOW FOR THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTED RUNOFF. A SMALL VEGETATED BERM SHALL BE PLACED AROUND THE WASHDOWN AREA. INLET PROTECTION (SEE DETAIL 4, SHEET C5.0)IP2 TEMPORARY STONE CONSTRUCTION EXIT 110/13/15REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS DATED 09/24/15(SEE DETAIL 1, SHEET C5.0) BARRICADESB 211/19/15REVISIONS PER CITY COMMENTS DATED 11/03/152 756 2628 UPUP1'-9"6'-0"1'-9"UP UP GARAGE GARAGE GARAG E GARAG E GARAG E GARAG E GARAG E GARAG E GARAG E GARAG E GARAGE GARAGE GARAGE GARAGE UP UPGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGEGARAGE UP UP UP UP UP UP UPUPUP UPONLYPOOLTT TTTTTTTTT1006004005002009003001000700800NO PARKING NO PARKINGT TTTTTTTTNO PARKINGTXINGTRAILUP UP GARAGE GARAGE GARAGE GARAGE GARAGE GARAGE GARAG E GARAGE GARAGE GARAGE GARAGE GARAGE GARAG E GARAG E STS-1STS-2STS-3STS-4STS-5STS-7STS-9STS-11STS-12STS-47STS-10STS-8STS-30STS-31STS-33STS-35STS-48STS-52STS-55STS-56STS-57STS-53STS-49STS-34STS-32STS-13STS-14STS-15STS-18STS-17STS-20STS-19STS-16STS-29STS-28STS-27STS-26STS-25STS-24STS-23STS-22STS-21STS-46STS-44STS-42STS-40STS-39STS-38STS-37STS-36STS-41STS-43STS-45STS-54STS-51STS-50STS-50STS-32CSTS-32BSTS-32ASTS-50ESTS-50DSTS-50CSTS-50BSTS-50ASTS-6STS-17ASTS-19ASTS-30ASTS-24ASTS-22ASTS-37ESTS-37DSTS-37CSTS-37BSTS-37A33 3 3 323 2 3231 3 1 30 30 30 28 29 29 29 26 26 23 25 24 24 23 22 22 212521 25 24 2420STS-58STS-58STS-33ASTS-17STS-18STS-15STS-14STS-19STS-20STS-1STS-2STS-3STS-4STS-5STS-7STS-6STS-9STS-8STS-11STS-10STS-12STS-47STS-35STS-34STS-12ASTS-33STS-32STS-31STS-30STS-24STS-29STS-28STS-27STS-26STS-25STS-23STS-22STS-21STS-46STS-45STS-44STS-43STS-42STS-41STS-40STS-37STS-36STS-37ASTS-37BSTS-37CSTS-48STS-49STS-52STS-51STS-50STS-53STS-55STS-54STS-58STS-56STS-57182LF 182LF STORM 24" HP @ 1.00% 1.02%93LF 90LF STORM 18" HP @ 0.40% 0.10%22LF 21LF STORM 18" HP@ 0.98% 0.81%80LF 79LF STORM 18" HDPE @ 1.97% 1.58%STS-39STS-38126LF 126LF STORM 18" HP @ 0.45% 0.15%23LF 24LF STORM 18" HP@ 0.39% 0.29%126LF 126LF STORM 18" HP @ 1.90% 1.57%242LF 242LF STORM 30" HP @ 0.40% 0.61%21LF 21LF STORM 18" HP@ 0.42% 0.38%89LF 87LF STORM 30" HP @ 0.41% 0.55%22LF 21LF STORM 18" HP@ 0.37% 0.43%148LF 149LF STORM 24" HP @ 0.40% 0.42%22LF 21LF STORM 18" HP@2.05% 2.10%191LF 190LF STORM 24" HP @ 0.59% 0.45%22LF 21LF STORM 18" HP@0.42% 1.81%54LF 67LF STORM 18" HP@0.48% 0.48%1 2 3 L F 1 2 4 L F STORM 1 8 " HD PE @ 0 . 4 0% 0 . 3 8% 7 9 L F 7 8 LF STORM 1 8 " HDP E @ 0. 4 0% 0. 2 3%67LF 65LF STORM 18"HDPE @ 0.39% 0.34%69LF 68LF STORM18" HDPE @ 0.32% 0.24%120LF 120 L F ST O R M 4 2 " H P @ 0.4 1 % 0.2 5 %22LF 22LF STORM 18" HP@ 0.40% 0.27%1 9 7 L F 1 9 7 L F S T O R M 4 2 " H P @ 1. 5 7% 1. 3 3 %21LF 20LF STORM 18" HP@ 0.38% 0.45%30LF 29LF STORM 18" HP@ 0.40% 0.35%18LF 18LF STORM 18"HDPE @ 0.98% 0.89%30LF 30LF STORM 18"HDPE @ 1.00% 1.03%117LF 119LF STORM 18" HDPE @ 1.01% 0.76%57LF 55LF STORM 18"HDPE @ 0.99% 0.47%21LF 21LF STORM 18" HP@ 1.00% 1.14%44LF 41LF STORM 18"HDPE @ 0.40% 0.29%89LF 89LF STORM 24" HP @ 1.01% 1.38%21LF 21LF STORM 18" HP@ 1.04% 2.57%150LF 152LF STORM 30" HP @ 0.41% 0.38%45LF 44LF STORM 30" HP@ 0.40% 2.60%47LF 51LF STORM 42" HP@ 0.40% 1.80%79LF 78LF STORM 24" HP @ 0.40% 0.49%22LF 22LF STORM 18" HP@ 1.00% 0.41%140LF 140LF STORM 24" HP @ 0.40% 0.21%22LF 22LF STORM 18" HP@ 1.00% 2.27%114LF 115LF STORM 24" HP @ 0.40% 0.60%24LF 22LF STORM 18" HP@ 1.00% 0.86%86LF 86LF STORM 24" HP @ 0.41% 2.20%22L F 22L F ST O R M 1 8 " H P @ 0.2 7 % 14. 3 6 % 15 7 L F 15 6 L F ST O R M 1 8 " H P @ 2. 2 3 % 1. 8 5 %21LF 21LF STORM 18" HP@ 0.38% 0.45%36LF 37LF STORM 18"HSPE @ 0.99% 1.51%35LF 35LF STORM 18"HSPE @ 0.41% 0.51%41LF 43LF STORM 18"HSPE @ 0.41% 0.40%169LF 162LF STORM 42 " HP @ 0 .40% 0.31%82LF 84LF STORM 42" HP @ 0.40% 0.39%55LF 56LF STORM 18"HDPE @ 0.40% 0.43%21LF 20LF STORM 18"HDPE @ 0.43% 0.40%256LF 256LF STORM 48" HP @ 2.44% 2.45%44LF 45LF STORM 48"HP @ 0.37% 0.31%52LF 51LF STORM 48"HP @ 0.41% 0.39%151 L F 150 L F ST O R M 1 8 " H P @ 0.4 0 % 0.3 9 %39LF 40LF STORM 18" HP@ 0.40% 0.35%21LF 20LF STORM 18"HDPE @ 1.00% 1.40%22LF 21LF STORM 18" HP@ 0.37% 0.24%STS-5914LF 15LF STORM 18" HP @ 0.29% 3.53%OPTIMUM LAND SERVICES, LLC PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS 17 N SUMMERLIN AVE, ORLANDO, FL 32801 (321) 200-4904LICENSED BUSINESS NUMBER 8127 JEL SITE DEVELOPMENT 7090 ASTRO STREETWINTER PARK, FL 32792 OFFICE:(407) 673-0111 1 DATE REV 1 2 DATE REV 2 3 4 DATE REV 4 5 DATE REV 5 6 DATE REV 6 7 DATE REV 7 8 DATE REV 8 9 DATE REV 9 10 DATE REV 10 DATE REV 11 DATE REVISIONS 11AS-BUILTUTILITY PLANSHEET 1 OF 2SCALE: 1" = 40'DRAWN BY: IRAPPROVED BY: CEMDATE REV 3 STORM AS-BUILT PLAN FOR WINTER SPRINGS APARTMENTS SEMINOLE COUNTY FLORIDADATE:11/08/18LOCHRANE Consulting Engineers Surveyors 201 SOUTH BUMBY AVENUE , ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32803 PHONE :(407) 896-3317 SURVEYORS NOTES:1.COORDINATE DATA AND HORIZONTAL ROTATION ARE BASED ON PLAN HORIZONTAL CONTROL ASVERIFIED BY SURVEYOR. COORDINATES ARE RELATIVE TO FLORIDA STATE PLANE COORDINATESYSTEM, EAST ZONE, NAD 83.2.ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON PLAN VERTICAL CONTROL AS VERIFIED BYSURVEYOR. RELATIVE TO NGVD 29 DATUM.3.AS-BUILT DATA IS SHOWN IN BOLD PRINT.4.AS-BUILT DRAWINGS ARE A MODIFIED VERSION OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS.5.UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS MARKED BY OTHERS, THEN LOCATED.6.THE MEASUREMENTS SHOWN HEREON ARE IN U.S. SURVEY FEET. THE ACCURACY OF THIS SURVEYEXCEEDS THE REQUIREMENTS OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 5J-17.1 inch = ft.( IN FEET )GRAPHIC SCALE40I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS AS-BUILT SURVEY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBEDPROPERTY IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ANDBELIEF AS RECENTLY SURVEYED UNDER MY DIRECTION ON THE DATESHOWN, BASED ON INFORMATION FURNISHED TO ME AS NOTED ANDCONFORMS TO THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR LAND SURVEYING IN THESTATE OF FLORIDA IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 5J-17.052 FLORIDAADMINISTRATIVE CODES, PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027 FLORIDASTATUTES______________________________________________EDWARD J MIZOPROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER NO. 3376THIS SURVEY IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINALRAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER.757 1 3 0 8 1 8 2 0 . 2 1 9 1 6 14 1 9 4 1 7 1 5 1 08 1 6 6 1 1 12 2 6 1 8 2 2 0 . 2 0 2 0 4 10 1412161115131 7 2 0 1 9 1 8 1 7 1 5 1 4 21STS-PASTS-PCSTS-PDSTS-PESTS-PGSTS-PF113LF 118LF STS 60" HDPE @ 3.50% 3.45%3 5 1 L F 34 9 L F S T S 6 0 " H D P E @ 0. 3 0% 0. 2 9 %37LF 42LF STS 60"HDPE @ 0.30% 0.33%107LF 12 5 LF LF~STS 2 9 " x45 " RCP @ 0 .00% 0. 0 1%CCOPTIMUM LAND SERVICES, LLC PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS 17 N SUMMERLIN AVE, ORLANDO, FL 32801 (321) 200-4904LICENSED BUSINESS NUMBER 8127 JEL SITE DEVELOPMENT 7090 ASTRO STREETWINTER PARK, FL 32792 OFFICE:(407) 673-0111 1 DATE REV 1 2 DATE REV 2 3 4 DATE REV 4 5 DATE REV 5 6 DATE REV 6 7 DATE REV 7 8 DATE REV 8 9 DATE REV 9 10 DATE REV 10 DATE REV 11 DATE REVISIONS 11AS-BUILTUTILITY PLANSHEET 2 OF 2SCALE: 1" = 40'DRAWN BY: IRAPPROVED BY: CEMDATE REV 3 STORM AS-BUILT PLAN FOR WINTER SPRINGS APARTMENTS SEMINOLE COUNTY FLORIDADATE:11/08/18LOCHRANE Consulting Engineers Surveyors 201 SOUTH BUMBY AVENUE , ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32803 PHONE :(407) 896-3317 SURVEYORS NOTES:1.COORDINATE DATA AND HORIZONTAL ROTATION ARE BASED ON PLAN HORIZONTAL CONTROL ASVERIFIED BY SURVEYOR. COORDINATES ARE RELATIVE TO FLORIDA STATE PLANE COORDINATESYSTEM, EAST ZONE, NAD 83.2.ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON PLAN VERTICAL CONTROL AS VERIFIED BYSURVEYOR. RELATIVE TO NGVD 29 DATUM.3.AS-BUILT DATA IS SHOWN IN BOLD PRINT.4.AS-BUILT DRAWINGS ARE A MODIFIED VERSION OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS.5.UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS MARKED BY OTHERS, THEN LOCATED.6.THE MEASUREMENTS SHOWN HEREON ARE IN U.S. SURVEY FEET. THE ACCURACY OF THIS SURVEYEXCEEDS THE REQUIREMENTS OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 5J-17.1 inch = ft.( IN FEET )GRAPHIC SCALE4016.5' 16.42'17.9' 17.82'12.0' CONTROL ELEV.NE INV. 11.98'36"POND OUTFALLFDOT TYPE "E" INLETW/ STEEL GRATEGRT 17.9'INV 6.8' EPOND OUTFALSECTION "C-C"N.T.S.3/8" FIBERGLASS SKIMMER36"16.8"12"12"12"3/8" FIBERGLASS SKIMMER29"x45" RCPSKIMMER TOP ELEV.=18.4' 18.06'SKIMMER BOTTOM ELEV.=16.0'ELEV. 10.0'FRONT VIEWTOP VIEW8" PVC TEE, EXTEND TOP TOSTRUCTURE TOPCAP BOTTOM WITH 6.0"OPENINGI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS AS-BUILT SURVEY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBEDPROPERTY IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ANDBELIEF AS RECENTLY SURVEYED UNDER MY DIRECTION ON THE DATESHOWN, BASED ON INFORMATION FURNISHED TO ME AS NOTED ANDCONFORMS TO THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR LAND SURVEYING IN THESTATE OF FLORIDA IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 5J-17.052 FLORIDAADMINISTRATIVE CODES, PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027 FLORIDASTATUTES______________________________________________EDWARD J MIZOPROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER NO. 3376THIS SURVEY IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINALRAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER.7'5'5'4'758 Made By:NEB DATE:6/17/2021 Checked By:DMD DATE:6/17/2021 KHA Project Number: GPD GPM GPD GPM GPD GPM Chase Bank 3,357 0.14 470 0.33 940 0.65 1,880 1.31 TOTAL 470 0.33 940 0.65 1,880 1.31 Max Daily Flow (MDF) MDF = ADF x 2.0 Peak Hourly Flow (PHF) PHF = ADF x 4.0 SF Building Type ADF Chase Bank - SR 434 and Tuskawilla 140096016 Potable Water Demand PHFGPD/Unit MDF Bank 100 2nd Ave S, Suite 105N Building per Exhibit A of Seminole County Administrative Code and Seminole County Utilities Engineering Manual St. Petersburg, Florida 33701 Number of Units 759 kimley-horn.com 100 2nd Avenue South, Suite 105N, St. Petersburg, FL 33701 727 547 3999 June 24, 2021 To: City of Winter Springs Building Department 1126 E State Road 434, Winter Springs, FL 32708 From: Dawn Dodge, P.E. Kimley-Horn and Associates RE: Review Criteria Response – Chase Bank – SR 434 & Tuskawilla Application No. SP2021-0005 To whom it may concern, The following responses to review criteria are outlined below: (1) Whether the applicant has demonstrated the site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land, including its proposed density, height, scale and intensity, hours of operation, building and lighting design, setbacks, buffers, noise, refuse, odor, particulates, smoke, fumes and other emissions, parking and traffic generating characteristics, number of persons anticipated using, residing or working under the plan, and other off-site impacts, is compatible and harmonious with adjacent land uses, and will not adversely impact land use activities in the immediate vicinity. Analysis: The proposed height, scale, and intensity of the proposed development is consistent with the adjacent Wendy’s and similar surrounding uses previously approved within the Winter Springs Town Center. The proposed project does not affect density, as the proposed use is a retail building. In addition, the proposed daily hours of operation are consistent with surrounding uses. The project proposes a 3,357 SF Chase Bank. The proposed hours of operation are as follows: Monday – Friday 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; Saturday 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. an ATM, will be available 24 hours a day Impacts related to noise, refuse, odor, particulates, smoke, fumes and other emissions are anticipated to be negligible given the nature of the project. The development is compatible and harmonious with adjacent land uses and will not adversely impact land use activities in the immediate vicinity. (2) Whether the applicant has demonstrated the size and shape of the site, the proposed access and internal circulation, and the design enhancements to be adequate to accommodate the proposed density, scale and intensity of the site and final engineering plan requested. The site shall be of sufficient size to accommodate design amenities such as screening, buffers, landscaping, open space, off-street parking, safe and convenient automobile, bicycle, and pedestrian mobility at the site, and other similar site plan improvements needed to mitigate against potential adverse impacts of the proposed use. 760 kimley-horn.com 100 2nd Avenue South, Suite 105N, St. Petersburg, FL 33701 727 547 3999 Analysis: The size and shape of the site, the proposed access and internal circulation, and the design enhancements are adequate to accommodate the proposed development. The development provides full ingress and egress to the site from S.R. 434. Access to the site will be provided via one (1) full access driveway off SR 434 and two (2) full access internal driveways along Sea Hawk Cove. On-site improvements which include landscape screening for dumpster areas, bicycle parking for throughout the site, lighting, internal pedestrian walkways utilizing alternative pavement. A waiver is being requested from Winter Springs City Streetscape Ordinance 2020-02 Sec. 20- 605. which will alter the width of landscaping required along SR 434 to be consistent with the adjacent Wendy’s. The proposed streetscape will provide a 6-foot sidewalk and 14-foot for a total of 20 foot landscape buffer in-lieu of the 16-foot of treescape, 6-foot sidewalk, and 6-foot of landscaping for a total of 27-foot along State Road 434. Similarly, a waiver is requested from the landscape island requirement (LDC 20-324(8).f) to ensure consistency between adjacent developments. (3) Whether the proposed site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land will have an adverse impact on the local economy, including governmental fiscal impact, employment, and property values. Analysis: The proposed commercial development is a permitted use within the Town Center and within the S.R. 434 Corridor Overlay District. The development is not expected to have an adverse impact on the local economy, but to add to the local economy by means of generating tax revenue. Development of the subject property as a bank is anticipated to provide an increase to the City’s taxable value, as well as provide a catalyst for future commercial development in the surrounding area. (4) Whether the proposed site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land will have an adverse impact on the natural environment, including air, water, and noise pollution, vegetation and wildlife, open space, noxious and desirable vegetation, and flood hazards. Analysis: The subject site is currently vacant and is currently graded and ready to be developed. As a result, the proposed development will not have an adverse impact on the natural environment, including air, water, and noise pollution, vegetation and wildlife, open space, noxious and desirable vegetation, and flood hazards. The total gross area for the site is 0.70 acres and the proposed impervious area is 0.48 acres (68.5%). The maximum impervious allowable to connect into the master stormwater system is 80%, therefore the site is providing less than the allowable impervious cover. The City currently has a noise ordinance that restricts decibels ratings from 60-70 in commercial zones from 10:00 p.m. – 7:00 a.m. per Sec. 13-35. maximum permissible sound levels. Noise levels are not anticipated to exceed the allowable. Based on Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) No. 12117CO160F Community No. 120295, City of Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida, the proposed development site lies within a Zone X 761 kimley-horn.com 100 2nd Avenue South, Suite 105N, St. Petersburg, FL 33701 727 547 3999 (Other Areas). Zone X is for “areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain.” (5) Whether the proposed site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land will have an adverse impact on historic, scenic, and cultural resources, including views and vistas, and loss or degradation of cultural and historic resources. Analysis: It is not anticipated that the proposed development will have an adverse impact on any historic, scenic, or cultural resources, including views and vistas, and loss or degradation of cultural and historic resources. (6) Whether the proposed site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land will have an adverse impact on public services, including water, sewer, stormwater and surface water management, police, fire, parks and recreation, streets, public transportation, marina and waterways, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Analysis: The proposed development will be designed in accordance with the Town Center District Code, which will include the following public services; water, sewer, stormwater and surface water management, police, fire (Seminole County Fire Department). Water and sewer are available on-site and there is sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed development and stormwater served by a master stormwater pond. The proposed development is consistent with established retail developments and will not have an adverse impact on existing public services. A bicycle rack will be placed on site, as well as sidewalks for adequate pedestrian circulation. (7) Whether the site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land, and related traffic report and plan provided by the applicant, details safe and efficient means of ingress and egress into and out of the neighborhood and adequately addresses the impact of projected traffic on the immediate neighborhood, traffic circulation pattern for the neighborhood, and traffic flow through immediate intersections and arterials. Analysis: See approved Traffic Impact Analysis for discussion regarding impact on regarding traffic circulation. (8) Whether the proposed site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land will have an adverse impact on housing and social conditions, including variety of housing unit types and prices, and neighborhood quality. Analysis: The proposed development is not anticipated to have an adverse impact on housing and social conditions, as the proposed uses is retail. (9) Whether the proposed site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land avoids significant adverse odor, emission, noise, glare, and vibration impacts on adjacent and surrounding lands regarding refuse collection, service delivery, parking and loading, signs, lighting, and other sire elements. 762 kimley-horn.com 100 2nd Avenue South, Suite 105N, St. Petersburg, FL 33701 727 547 3999 Analysis: It anticipated that the proposed development will not emit odors, noise, glares, or vibrations that will adversely impact adjacent properties. There is adequate parking, limited hours of operation, lighting, and refuse collection, and minimal deliveries within the proposed development that are in place which will assist in limiting any perceived adverse effects. (10) Whether the applicant has provided an acceptable security plan for the proposed establishment to be located on the site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land that addresses the safety and security needs of the establishment and its users and employees and minimizes impacts on the neighborhood, if applicable. Analysis: Security plan provided showing that security systems will be installed. The lighting provided illustrates that onsite area will be lit after dark. (11) Whether the applicant has provided on the site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land an acceptable plan for the mass delivery of merchandise for new large footprint buildings (greater than twenty thousand (20,000) square feet) including the hours of operation for delivery trucks to come into and exit the property and surrounding neighborhood, if applicable. Analysis: Not applicable for the proposed use. Proposed building is less than 20,000 SF. (12) Whether the applicant has demonstrated that the site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land have been designed to incorporate mitigative techniques and plans needed to prevent adverse impacts addressed in the criteria stated herein or to adjacent and surrounding uses and properties. Analysis: The Final Engineering Plans, in conjunction with the Development Agreement, prevent adverse impacts to adjacent and surrounding uses and properties. The proposed development will provide adequate screening and buffering. In addition, the proposed site circulation will use internal access roads, therefore it will not heavily impact local traffic patterns. Sufficient parking has been proposed for this use based on typical jurisdictional requirements. (13) Whether the applicant has agreed to execute a binding development agreement required by city to incorporate the terms and conditions of approval deemed necessary by the city commission including, but not limited to, any mitigative techniques and plans required by City Code. Analysis: The applicant has agreed to execute a binding Development Agreement dated 7/31/2020. 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 REGULAR AGENDA ITEM 500 CITY COMMISSION AGENDA | SEPTEMBER 13, 2021 REGULAR MEETING TITLE Appointment Opportunities for City Boards and Committees SUMMARY The City Clerk Department wishes to inform the City Commission of the following vacancies: Per Section 2-41(e) of the City Code, "If any commissioner fails to appoint a member within thirty (30) days after a vacancy occurs or a term expires, that seat shall be filled by a majority vote of the commission." CURRENT VACANCIES: Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee Seat Five - Commissioner Elliott (Term Expires February 1, 2025) Youth Council Mayor - Two (2) appointments remaining Seat One - One (1) appointment remaining Seat Five - Two (2) appointments remaining UPCOMING VACANCIES The Districting Commission will soon be actively accepting applications - Each Commissioner appoints one (1) member from their district and the Mayor appoints two (2) members from the City At-Large. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Commission make any appointments they deem pertinent. 774