Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Copy of 05 - Evaluation Criteria - Calcs
Evaluation Criteria Committee Member 1 Commissioner Rob Elliott Committee Member 2 Michael Blake (Pension BOT)Committee Member 3 Carol Conroy (Fin Dir - Casselberry) RFP 04-21 HQ Example Calculations Example Calculations Example Calculations Price Price Price Evaluation Criteria Firm Name $42,500 Firm Name $42,500 Firm Name $42,500 Tab Assignment Max Points Evaluation Criteria Max Points Rating Rating %Score Evaluation Criteria Max Points Rating Rating %Score Evaluation Criteria Max Points Rating Rating %Score A Firm’s Qualifications and Experience 35 Firm’s Qualifications and Experience 35 2 50%17.50 Firm’s Qualifications and Experience 35 3 75%26.25 Firm’s Qualifications and Experience 35 3 75%26.25 B 25 Similar Projects/References 25 3 75%18.75 Similar Projects/References 25 3 75%18.75 Similar Projects/References 25 3 75%18.75 C 30 Project Approach 30 4 100%30.00 Project Approach 30 3 75%22.50 Project Approach 30 3 75%22.50 D 10 Price Proposal/Fee Schedule 10 8.35 84%8.35 Price Proposal/Fee Schedule 10 8.35 84%8.35 Price Proposal/Fee Schedule 10 8.35 84%8.35 100 Total Score 74.60 Total Score 75.85 Total Score 75.85 Adjectival Rating Rating %Price Price Price 0 Unsatifactory 0%Firm Name $40,000 Firm Name $40,000 Firm Name $40,000 1 Below Min Stds 25%Evaluation Criteria Max Points Rating Rating %Score Evaluation Criteria Max Points Rating Rating %Score Evaluation Criteria Max Points Rating Rating %Score 2 Marginal 50%Firm’s Qualifications and Experience 35 3 75%26.25 Firm’s Qualifications and Experience 35 3 75%26.25 Firm’s Qualifications and Experience 35 3 75%26.25 3 Satisfactory 75%Similar Projects/References 25 3 75%18.75 Similar Projects/References 25 3 75%18.75 Similar Projects/References 25 3 75%18.75 4 Excellent 100%Project Approach 30 4 100%30.00 Project Approach 30 4 100%30.00 Project Approach 30 3 75%22.50 Price Proposal/Fee Schedule 10 8.88 89%8.88 Price Proposal/Fee Schedule 10 8.88 89%8.88 Price Proposal/Fee Schedule 10 8.88 89%8.88 Total Score 83.88 Total Score 83.88 Total Score 76.38 Lowest Bid $35,500 example see calc below Proposal Examples % Calc Max Point Points Applied $42,500 84%10 8.35 Price Price Price $40,000 89%10 8.88 Firm Name $35,500 Firm Name $35,500 Firm Name $35,500 $35,500 100%10 10.00 Evaluation Criteria Max Points Rating Rating %Score Evaluation Criteria Max Points Rating Rating %Score Evaluation Criteria Max Points Rating Rating %Score Firm’s Qualifications and Experience 35 2 50%17.50 Firm’s Qualifications and Experience 35 2 50%17.50 Firm’s Qualifications and Experience 35 2 50%17.50 Similar Projects/References 25 3 75%18.75 Similar Projects/References 25 3 75%18.75 Similar Projects/References 25 3 75%18.75 Project Approach 30 4 100%30.00 Project Approach 30 3 75%22.50 Project Approach 30 2 50%15.00 Price Proposal/Fee Schedule 10 10.00 100%10.00 Price Proposal/Fee Schedule 10 10.00 100%10.00 Price Proposal/Fee Schedule 10 10.00 100%10.00 Total Score 76.25 Total Score 68.75 Total Score 61.25 Total The information in this sheet is used for example puroses only Firms Elliott Blake Conroy Score Bid administrator will fill in the tan colored fields based on the information provided by the respondants. ABC Audit Firm 74.60 75.85 75.85 226.31 Yellow cells will be populated based on the scoring provided by each member for each respondant. XYZ Audit Firm 83.88 83.88 76.38 244.13 123 Audit Firm 76.25 68.75 61.25 206.25 Category Similar Projects/References Project Approach Price Proposal/Fee Schedule Maximum Total Points Members ABC Audit Firm XYZ Audit Firm 123 Audit Firm ABC Audit Firm XYZ Audit Firm 123 Audit Firm ABC Audit Firm XYZ Audit Firm 123 Audit Firm