Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2020 11 04 Planning and Zoning Board LPA Regular Meeting Agenda
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY REGULAR MEETING AGENDA WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2020 - 5:30 PM CITY HALL - COMMISSION CHAMBERS 1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434, WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 1 CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Invocation Pledge of Allegiance Agenda Changes AWARDS AND PRESENTATIONS 100. Not Used INFORMATIONAL AGENDA 200. Not Used PUBLIC INPUT Anyone who wishes to speak during Public Input on any Agenda Item or subject matter will need to fill out a “Public Input” form. Individuals will limit their comments to three (3) minutes, and representatives of groups or homeowners' associations shall limit their comments to five (5) minutes, unless otherwise determined by the City Commission. CONSENT AGENDA 300. Approval of the Minutes from the Wednesday, September 2, 2020 Planning And Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency Regular Meeting Minutes PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA 400. Chase Bank Conditional Use Application and Development Agreement Chase Bank Tuskawilla - PZB Staff Report Conditional Use Exhibit 1 - Vicinity and Aerial Map Exhibit 2 - Conditional Use Application Exhibit 3 - Conceptual Plans Exhibit 4 - Traffic Impact Analysis Exhibit 5 - Development Agreement - 7/31/2020 Exhibit 6 - Concept Security Camera Plan Exhibit 7 - Concept Lighting Plan Exhibit 8 - Concept Tree-Landscape Plan 401. Chau Medical Center – Final Engineering/Site Plan Approval, Aesthetic Plan Approval for the Medical Office, Specimen Tree Removal, certain Waivers from the City Code, and Development Agreement. 2 Chau Medical Center PZB Staff Report Exhibit 1 - Vicinity Map Exhibit 2 - Aesthetic Review Exhibit 3 - Waiver Application Exhibit 4 - Final Engineering Plans Exhibit 5 - Chau Medical Center Development Agreement REGULAR AGENDA 500. Discussion on moving the Planning and Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency monthly meeting day. REPORTS PUBLIC INPUT Anyone who wishes to speak during Public Input on any Agenda Item or subject matter will need to fill out a “Public Input” form. Individuals will limit their comments to three (3) minutes, and representatives of groups or homeowners' associations shall limit their comments to five (5) minutes, unless otherwise determined by the City Commission. ADJOURNMENT PUBLIC NOTICE This is a Public Meeting, and the public is invited to attend and this Agenda is subject to change. Please be advised that one (1) or more Members of any of the City's Advisory Boards and Committees may be in attendance at this Meeting, and may participate in discussions. Persons with disabilities needing assistance to participate in any of these proceedings should contact the City of Winter Springs at (407) 327-1800 "at least 48 hours prior to meeting, a written request by a physically handicapped person to attend the meeting, directed to the chairperson or director of such board, commission, agency, or authority" - per Section 286.26 Florida Statutes. "If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the board, agency, or commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he or she will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purpose, he or she may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based" - per Section 286.0105 Florida Statutes. 3 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 02, 2020 CALL TO ORDER Chairperson Kok Wan Mah called the Regular Meeting of Wednesday, September 2, 2020 of the Planning and Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency to Order at 5:34 p.m., in the Commission Chambers of the Municipal Building (City Hall, 1126 East State Road 434, Winter Springs, Florida 32708.) Roll Call: Chairperson Kok Wan Mah, present Vice-Chairperson Kevin McCann, present Board Member Michael Ferrante, present via phone Board Member Bart Phillips, absent Board Member James Evans, present Assistant to the City Clerk Tristin Motter, present A moment of silence was followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. No changes were made to the Agenda. AWARDS AND PRESENTATIONS 100. Not Used INFORMATIONAL AGENDA 200. Not Used PUBLIC INPUT Chairperson Mah opened “Public Input”. No one addressed the Board. Chairperson Mah closed “Public Input”. 4 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY REGULAR MEETING – SEPTEMBER 2, 2020 PAGE 2 OF 4 P L A N N I N G A N D Z O N I N G B O A R D / L O C A L P L A N N I N G A G E N C Y R E G U L A R M E E T I N G | W E D N E S D A Y , J U N E 5 , 2 0 1 9 | P A G E 2 OF 4 CONSENT AGENDA 300. Approval of the Minutes from the Wednesday, July 1, 2020 Planning and Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency Regular Meeting Chairperson Mah asked for a motion to approve the minutes of the July 1, 2020 Planning and Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency Regular Meeting. “I MAKE THE MOTION THAT WE APPROVE.” MOTION BY VICE- CHAIRPERSON McCANN. SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER EVANS. DISCUSSION. VOTE: VICE-CHAIRPERSON McCANN: AYE BOARD MEMBER EVANS: AYE BOARD MEMBER FERRANTE: AYE CHAIRPERSON MAH: AYE MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA 400. Small-Scale | Future Land Use Map Amendment and Rezone Mr. John Cooper, City Planner, Community Development Department introduced the item and provided an overview of the proposed changes and potential uses of the property in question. Ms. Sandra Gorman, Senior Traffic Engineer, CHP, 3501 Mariner Street, Tampa, Florida and Mr. Dwight Saathoff, Manager for Sand Loch Capital Investors, President of Project Finance and Development, 7575 Dr. Phillips Blvd. Suite 265, Orlando, Florida 32819, were present to address the Board’s concerns and questions on traffic flow, increased average trips, Lot specifics and disturbances to surrounding neighborhoods. Chairperson Mah opened the Public Hearing for Item 400 No one addressed the Board. Chairperson Mah closed the Public Hearing or Item 400 5 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY REGULAR MEETING – SEPTEMBER 2, 2020 PAGE 3 OF 4 P L A N N I N G A N D Z O N I N G B O A R D / L O C A L P L A N N I N G A G E N C Y R E G U L A R M E E T I N G | W E D N E S D A Y , J U N E 5 , 2 0 1 9 | P A G E 3 OF 4 “I MAKE THE MOTION THAT THE FIRST IS APPROVED [ODINANCE 2020-06 THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FUTURE LAND USE CHANGE].” MOTION BY VICE-CHAIRPERSON McCANN. SECONDED BY CHAIRPERSON MAH. DISCUSSION. VOTE: BOARD MEMBER FERRANTE: AYE CHAIRPERSON MAH: AYE VICE-CHAIRPERSON McCANN: AYE BOARD MEMBER EVANS: AYE MOTION CARRIED. “I WILL MAKE THE MOTION TO CHANGE THE ZONING FROM R1-A TO C-1.” MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER EVANS. SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER FERRANTE. DISCUSSION. VOTE: CHAIRPERSON MAH: AYE VICE-CHAIRPERSON McCANN: AYE BOARD MEMBER EVANS: AYE BOARD MEMBER FERRANTE: AYE MOTION CARRIED. Discussion ensued on the City’s Comprehensive Plan in regards to changes. REGULAR AGENDA 500. Not Used REPORTS Chairperson Mah spoke PUBLIC INPUT Chairperson Mah opened “Public Input”. No one addressed the Board. Chairperson Mah closed “Public Input”. 6 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY REGULAR MEETING – SEPTEMBER 2, 2020 PAGE 4 OF 4 P L A N N I N G A N D Z O N I N G B O A R D / L O C A L P L A N N I N G A G E N C Y R E G U L A R M E E T I N G | W E D N E S D A Y , J U N E 5 , 2 0 1 9 | P A G E 4 OF 4 Mr. Christopher Schmidt, Director, Community Development Department asked about changing the scheduled day of the Planning and Zoning Board to either the first or third Thursday of each month from the first Wednesday of the month. The Board Members relayed their availability. ADJOURNMENT Chairperson Mah adjourned the Regular Meeting at 6:33 p.m. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: _____________________________________ TRISTIN MOTTER ASSISTANT TO THE CITY CLERK NOTE: These Minutes were approved at the __________, 2020 Planning and Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency Regular Meeting. 7 PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM 400 PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY AGENDA | NOVEMBER 4, 2020 REGULAR MEETING TITLE Chase Bank Conditional Use Application and Development Agreement SUMMARY The subject property is a lot of record located at the NW corner of E. State Road 434 and Sea Hawk Cove, Winter Springs, FL 32708. The applicant is proposing a financial institution (bank) with a drive-through within the Town Center District. The proposed use of a financial institution/bank requires a conditional use permit. Per Town Center District Sec. 20-323, the Town Center District Code the use is only permitted by Conditional Use. Upon receipt of the Planning and Zoning Board's recommendation, the City Commission shall make a final decision on the application, to allow or deny the use within the Town Center District and Development Agreement. RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department requests that the Planning and Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency hold a Public Hearing to consider a Conditional Use Permit for a 3,470 square foot (SF) retail building, to allow the use of a financial institution (bank) with a drive-through within Town Center District and Development Agreement. 8 PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM 400 PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2020 | REGULAR MEETING TITLE Chase Bank - Conditional Use SUMMARY The Community Development Department requests that the Planning and Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency hold a Public Hearing to consider a Conditional Use Permit for a 3,470 square foot (SF) retail building, to allow the use of a financial institution (bank) with a drive-through within Town Center District. General Information Applicant Donnally Bailey Property Owner(s) JDBS Winter Springs, LLC (JDBS) Location E. State Road 434 Winter Springs, FL 32708 Tract Size ±.70 Acres Parcel ID Number 06-21-31-507-0000-0010 Zoning Designation Town Center District (T-C) | T5 Transect | Urban Center Zone FLUM Designation Town Center District Adjacent Land Use North: Town Center District East: Town Center District South: Town Center District West: Town Center District Principle building setbacks (from property line) Front/principle plane: 25 ft.- 50 ft. max (from front property line) Rear: 15 ft. (from rear property line) Side: 5 ft. min, 100 ft. max. (from side property line) Frontage buildout: 20% min. (at front setback) Development Standards Lot Width: 18 ft. min., 180 ft. max. Lot Depth: 30 ft. min., 160 ft. max. Lot Coverage: 100% max. 2 stories minimum 3 stories maximum Development Permits Not applicable | Vacant 9 PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM 400 | WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2020 | PAGE 2 OF 9 Development Agreement Development Agreement | August 4, 2020 Code Enforcement Not applicable City Liens Not applicable Request: The subject property is a lot of record located at the NW corner of E. State Road 434 and Sea Hawk Cove, Winter Springs, FL 32708. The applicant is proposing a financial institution (bank) with a drive-through within the Town Center District. The proposed use of a “financial institution/bank” requires a conditional use permit. Per Town Center District Sec. 20-323, the Town Center District Code the use is only permitted by Conditional Use. Upon receipt of the Planning and Zoning Board's recommendation, the City Commission shall make a final decision on the application, to allow or deny the use within the Town Center District. Conditional Use Requirement: All conditional use recommendations and final decisions shall be based on the following criteria to the extent applicable: Conditional uses criteria set forth in subsection 20-33(d) are as follows: 1. Whether the applicant has demonstrated the conditional use, including its proposed density, height, scale and intensity, hours of operation, building and lighting design, setbacks, buffers, noise, refuse, odor, particulates, smoke, fumes and other emissions, parking and traffic-generating characteristics, number of persons anticipated using, residing or working under the conditional use, and other offsite impacts, is compatible and harmonious with adjacent land uses, and will not adversely impact land use activities in the immediate vicinity. Applicant: See Exhibit 2, for the Applicant’s responses. Findings: The applicant has demonstrated the proposed use does not affect density, as the proposed use is a retail building. The proposed building will include a faux second two-story, meet setback requirements, and include buffers and is consistent with adjacent uses. The proposed use will not cause added noise, refuse, odor, particulates, smoke, fumes and other emissions, as the proposed use is a bank. The applicant has demonstrated that the parking and traffic-generating characteristics of the proposed use will not adversely impact the site and surrounding area. The proposed development will be designed to implement the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan as they relate to the Town Center District, and to continue a harmonious land use pattern with existing development. The development is consistent with existing development and recently approved development within the Town Center District. 10 PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM 400 | WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2020 | PAGE 3 OF 9 The proposed hours of operation are Monday thru Friday 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Saturday 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m., and an ATM, will be available 24 hours a day. 2. Whether the applicant has demonstrated the size and shape of the site, the proposed access and internal circulation, and the design enhancements to be adequate to accommodate the proposed density, scale and intensity of the conditional use requested. The site shall be of sufficient size to accommodate design amenities such as screening, buffers, landscaping, open space, off-street parking, safe and convenient automobile, bicycle, and pedestrian mobility at the site, and other similar site plan improvements needed to mitigate against potential adverse impacts of the proposed use. Applicant: See Exhibit 2, for the Applicant’s responses. Findings: The applicant has demonstrated the size and shape of the site and has proposed access and internal circulation which are adequate to accommodate the proposed density, scale and intensity of the conditional use requested. Evaluation of the traffic pattern has shown that the proposed circulation will use existing access points with minimal to no impact on traffic entering or exiting State Road 434. The applicant will be required to provide a landscape plan and demonstrate that the required screening, landscaping, open space, and off-street parking meets both the Town Center District Code and Ordinance 2020-02 Chapter 20 - Streetscape, Setbacks, & Step-backs requirements. The applicant will request a waiver from Ordinance 2020-02 Chapter 20 – Streetscape, Setbacks &Step- back requirements in order to match the frontage of existing and previously approved adjacent properties to include bicycle and pedestrian mobility access. Sidewalk access around the subject property and a bicycle rack will be provided. The Town Center requires a parking analysis. The analysis results in 1 space / 300 SF for retail space, which would require 12 parking spaces. The applicant proposes 26 spaces, which exceeds this requirement. The proposed parking access on the subject property is adequate for the proposed use. 3. Whether the proposed use will have an adverse impact on the local economy, including governmental fiscal impact, employment, and property values. Applicant: See Exhibit 2, for the Applicant’s responses. Findings: The proposed development is expected to have a favorable effect on the economy of the Winter Springs Town Center District by generating tax revenue. Development of the subject property as a bank is anticipated to provide an increase to the City’s taxable value, as well as provide a catalyst for future commercial development in the surrounding area. 4. Whether the proposed use will have an adverse impact on the natural environment, including air, water, and noise pollution, vegetation and wildlife, open space, noxious and desirable vegetation, and flood hazards. Applicant: See Exhibit 2, for the Applicant’s responses. 11 PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM 400 | WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2020 | PAGE 4 OF 9 Findings: The subject site is currently vacant and is currently graded and ready to be developed. As a result, the proposed development will not have an adverse impact on the natural environment, including air, water, and noise pollution, vegetation and wildlife, open space, noxious and desirable vegetation, and flood hazards. 5. Whether the proposed use will have an adverse impact on historic, scenic, and cultural resources, including views and vistas, and loss or degradation of cultural and historic resources. Applicant: See Exhibit 2, for the Applicant’s responses. Findings: The proposed use will not have adverse impact on historic, scenic, and cultural resources, including views and vistas, and loss or degradation of cultural and historic resources. There are no historical resources located on the site. 6. Whether the proposed use will have an adverse impact on public services, including water, sewer, stormwater and surface water management, police, fire, parks and recreation, streets, public transportation, marina and waterways, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Applicant: See Exhibit 2, for the Applicant’s responses. Findings: The proposed development will be designed in accordance with the Town Center District Code, which will includes the following public services; water, sewer, stormwater and surface water management, police, fire (Seminole County Fire Department). Water and sewer are available on-site and there is sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed development and stormwater served by a master stormwater pond. The proposed development is consistent with established retail developments and will not have an adverse impact on existing public services. A bicycle rack will be placed on site, as well as sidewalks for adequate pedestrian circulation. 7. Whether the traffic report and plan provided by the applicant details safe and efficient means of ingress and egress into and out of the neighborhood and adequately address the impact of projected traffic on the immediate and neighborhood, traffic circulation pattern for the neighborhood, and traffic flow through immediate intersections and arterials. Applicant: See Exhibit 2, for the Applicant’s responses. Findings: The proposed use will change the existing drive lane configurations for the adjacent properties and connect proposed traffic circulation to existing drive lanes. A preliminary evaluation of traffic has indicated that there will be a minimal to no impact and the conceptual plan details safe and efficient means of ingress and egress for the proposed development. The applicant’s proposal includes a Traffic Impact Analysis that indicates the operation at a satisfactory Level of Service. The anticipated trip generation for the financial institution (bank) use proposes 347 new net daily trips, of which 33 will occur in the A.M. peak hour and 71 will occur in the P.M. peak hour. The trip generation calculation for Chase Bank was previously addressed in Traffic Impact Analysis with the overall platting of Ocean Bleu retail shops, Starbucks, and Wendy’s 12 PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM 400 | WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2020 | PAGE 5 OF 9 Fast Food. The proposed development is projected to generate 2,422 new net daily trips, of which 279 will occur in the A.M. peak hour and 186 will occur in the P.M. peak hour. 8. Whether the proposed use will have an adverse impact on housing and social conditions, including variety of housing unit types and prices, and neighborhood quality. Applicant: See Exhibit 2, for the Applicant’s responses. Findings: The proposed development is a financial institution (bank) and the use will not have an adverse impact on housing. 9. Whether the proposed use avoids significant adverse odor, emission, noise, glare, and vibration impacts on adjacent lands regarding refuse collection, service, parking and loading signs, lighting, and other sire elements. Applicant: See Exhibit 2, for the Applicant’s responses. Findings: The proposed use as a financial institution (bank) adds minimal to no adverse effects related to odors, emission, noise, glare, and vibration impacts on adjacent lands regarding refuse collection, service, parking and loading signs, lighting, and other sire elements. The collection site will be located on the northeast corner of the lot away from the proposed traffic pattern and State Road 434. The proposed lighting plan (Exhibit 7) is consistent with adjacent developments and appropriate for the proposed use. 10. Whether the applicant has provided an acceptable security plan for the proposed establishment that addresses the safety and security needs of the establishment and its users and employees and minimizes impacts on the neighborhood, if applicable. Applicant: See Exhibit 2, for the Applicant’s responses. Findings: The applicant has not provided security plan specific for this site. An evaluation of the security plan from a similar development is consistent with security requirements. A site specific security plan will be required with the final development plan and final engineering approval. Elements of the submitted security plan will be used such as security camera placement and monitoring aspects consistent with the applicant’s security requirements. 11. Whether the applicant provided an acceptable plan for the mass delivery of merchandise for new large footprint buildings (greater than 20,000 square feet) including the hours of operation for delivery trucks to come into and exit the property and surrounding neighborhood, if applicable. Applicant: See Exhibit 2, for the Applicant’s responses. Findings: Not applicable to the proposed use. 12. Whether the applicant has demonstrated that the conditional use and associated site plan have been designed to incorporate mitigative techniques and plans needed to prevent adverse impacts addressed in the criteria stated herein or to adjacent and surrounding uses and properties. 13 PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM 400 | WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2020 | PAGE 6 OF 9 Applicant: See Exhibit 2, for the Applicant’s responses. Findings: The applicant has provided preliminary designs to show traffic impact and site circulation. The applicant has provided a Traffic Impact Analysis that states a sufficient Level of Service is maintained. The proposed site will utilize the previously stubbed out internal access road for this site’s use as contemplated within the overall master design of the surrounding uses. The proposed site circulation will use internal access roads, therefore it will not heavily impact local traffic patterns. Sufficient parking has been proposed for this use based on typical jurisdictional requirements. 13. If the proposed conditional use is a residential use, whether the elementary, middle and high schools (K- 12) that will be initially assigned to the residential project by the School District at the time the city commission considers final approval of the conditional use have both sufficient capacity, are in close proximity to the project so as to make each of the assigned schools accessible and convenient (e. g., walking distance travel time, private and public transportation, and quality of route environment) to the majority of the school population that will be drawn from the project, and promote and support the integration of future residents of the project into the existing city of Winter Springs community in a sustainable manner. Applicant: See Exhibit 2, for the Applicant’s responses. Findings: Not applicable to the proposed use. 14. Whether the applicant has agreed to execute a binding development agreement required by city to incorporate the terms and conditions of approval deemed necessary by the city commission including, but not limited to, any mitigative techniques and plans required by city code. Applicant: See Exhibit 2, for the Applicant’s responses. Findings: The applicant has reviewed and agreed to the Development Agreement dated July 31, 2020. As outlined in the Development Agreement: The Developer may, at its expense; design, permit, and construct a local branch of Chase Bank with a drive-through, to be located in the City of Winter Springs Town Center District. The proposed bank building and all public and private project infrastructure shall be constructed in a single phase. An evaluation of the criteria for Conditional Use shows that the proposed development is consistent with adjacent developments and will not have an adverse impact on the economy, the environment or land use activities in the immediate vicinity. Its proposed use will integrate with adjacent retail and further increase the City’s taxable revenue. The proposal has addressed all fourteen (14) specific criteria as required for a Conditional Use in the City Code of Ordinances. The request to allow a Conditional Use Permit conforms to the requirements as listed. 14 PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM 400 | WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2020 | PAGE 7 OF 9 Procedural History: August 1, 2019 Conditional Application Submittal October 10, 2019 Conditional Use Application Submittal February 20, 2020 Community Workshop October 7, 2020 Planning & Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency | Cancelled November 4, 2020 Planning & Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency | Recommendation Applicable Law, Public Policy, and Events: City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan City of Winter Springs Code of Ordinances Ch20, Sec. 20-1. Definitions. Ch20, Sec. 20-33. Conditional Uses. Fiscal Impact: Development of the subject property as a bank is anticipated to provide an increase to the City’s taxable value, as well as provide a catalyst for future commercial development in the surrounding area. Impact Fees/Unit > Based on total SF (square footage), GFA (gross floor area) unless noted otherwise – Non-Residential. Chase Bank ~2,183 SF (Bank w/ Drive-up ATM) Commercial Transportation/Road: $ 19,216.00/1,000 SF GFA = $ 66,679.52 Fire: $ 320.00/1,000 net SF = $ 1,110.40 Police: $ 0.156 per SF = $ 541.31 Parks & Recreation: N/A City Impact Fees (Chase Bank) Total = $ 68,331.24 15 PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM 400 | WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2020 | PAGE 8 OF 9 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use subject to the following Conditions of Approval: 1. The Developer’s Conceptual Sketch, as shown in Exhibit 3 – Conceptual Plans, includes a common driveway access with the adjacent parcel, which will be constructed to straddle the Property’s eastern property line. The adjacent parcel is intended to be a future Wendy’s fast food restaurant, which itself is the subject of a certain Development Agreement recorded in the Official Records of Seminole County at Book 9538, Pages 745-755 (“Adjacent Parcel”). Therefore, the Developer has provided an executed Declaration of Covenants, Restricts and Reciprocal Easements Agreement, recorded in the Official Records of Seminole County at Book 9354, Pages 127-163, on May 14, 2019 (“Declaration”), which includes an easement for reciprocal ingress and egress between the Property and the Adjacent Parcel (“Access Easement”). Should the parties ever mutually desire to terminate the Access Easement set forth in the Declaration, prior to executing such termination, the parties shall be required to seek and receive consent from the City of Winter Springs and obtain an amendment to the future site plan and final engineering plans. 2. There shall be no retail sales of alcohol and no retail sales, manufacturing, or compounding of any products derived from the hemp plant or cannabis plant, including CBD (cannabidiol). 3. Developer shall be required to, at minimum, receive final engineering and site plan approval and aesthetic plan approval prior to receiving any building permit for the Project. In accordance with Section 20-36 of the City Code, the conditional use shall expire two (2) years after the Effective Date of this Agreement unless a building permit based upon and incorporating the conditional use is issued by the city within such two (2) years. The conditional use shall expire two and one-half (2 ½) years after the Effective Date of this Agreement unless the Developer has substantially commenced vertical construction of buildings, which shall at minimum include building foundations, within such two and one-half (2 ½) years. 4. The Conditional Use approval is conditioned upon execution of the Development Agreement and subject to the terms and conditions contained therein. 16 PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM 400 | WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2020 | PAGE 9 OF 9 Attachments: Exhibit 1 – Vicinity and Aerial Maps Exhibit 2 – Conditional Use Application-October 10, 2019 Exhibit 3 – Conceptual Plans Exhibit 4 – Traffic Impact Analysis Exhibit 5 – Development Agreement – July 31, 2020 Exhibit 6 – Concept Security Plan (Example) Exhibit 7 – Concept Lighting Plan Exhibit 8 – Concept Tree-Landscape Plan 17 Project Site Parcel ID# 06-21-31-507-0000-0010 SUBJECT PROPERTY 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS WINTER SPRINGS TOWN CENTER COMMERCIAL OUTPARCELS WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA Prepared for: NV5, INC. 201 South Bumby Avenue Orlando, Florida 32803 Prepared by: Traffic Planning and Design, Inc. 535 Versailles Drive Maitland, Florida 32751 407-628-9955 Revised March 2019 TPD № 4887 25 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that I am a Professional Engineer properly registered in the State of Florida practicing with Traffic Planning & Design, Inc., a corporation authorized to operate as an engineering business, EB-3702, by the State of Florida Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Professional Engineers, and that I have prepared or approved the evaluations, findings, opinions, conclusions, or technical advice attached hereto for: PROJECT: Winter Springs Town Center Commercial Outparcels LOCATION: Winter Springs, Florida CLIENT: NV5, INC. I hereby acknowledge that the procedures and references used to develop the results contained in these computations are standard to the professional practice of Transportation Engineering as applied through professional judgment and experience. NAME: Turgut Dervish, P.E. P.E. No.: 20400 DATE: March 28, 2019 SIGNATURE: 26 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 EXISTING ROADWAY ANALYSIS .............................................................................................. 4 Roadway Segment Analysis Intersection Analysis PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND TRIP GENERATION .......................................................... 8 Trip Generation Trip Distribution/Trip Assignment PROJECTED TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ...................................................................................... 12 Roadway Segment Analysis Intersection Analysis Turn Lane Analysis STUDY CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................ 19 APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................. 21 A City of Winter Springs Standard Scope of Work for a Traffic Study B Intersection Counts and Signal Timing Data C Synchro Capacity Analysis Worksheets Existing Conditions D Model Distribution Plot E Trends Analysis Charts F Synchro Capacity Analysis Worksheets Projected Conditions 27 TABLE OF CONTENTS, continued LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1 Existing Daily Roadway Capacity Analysis .................................................................... 5 Table 2 Existing A.M./P.M. Peak Hour Roadway Capacity Analysis .......................................... 5 Table 3 Existing Intersection Capacity Analysis ......................................................................... 7 Table 4 Trip Generation Summary .............................................................................................. 8 Table 5 Projected Daily Roadway Capacity Analysis ................................................................ 12 Table 6 Projected A.M. Peak Hour Roadway Capacity Analysis ............................................... 13 Table 7 Projected P.M. Peak Hour Roadway Capacity Analysis ............................................... 13 Table 8 Projected Intersection Capacity Analysis ..................................................................... 17 Table 9 Required Turn Lane Length Calculation ....................................................................... 18 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Project Location Map ..................................................................................................... 2 Figure 2 Proposed Site Plan ........................................................................................................ 3 Figure 3 Existing A.M./P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ............................................................. 6 Figure 4 Project Trip Distribution ............................................................................................... 10 Figure 5 Project Trip Assignment ............................................................................................... 11 Figure 6 Projected A.M. Peak Hour Intersection Volumes ......................................................... 15 Figure 7 Projected P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Volumes ......................................................... 16 28 Winter Springs Town Center Commercial Outparcels Project № 4887 Page 1 INTRODUCTION This traffic analysis was performed to assess the impact of the proposed commercial outparcels of the Winter Springs Town Center. Located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of SR 434 and Michael Blake Boulevard, the proposed development will consist of a drive-in bank and three restaurants, two of which will have drive-through windows. Access to the site will be provided via Michael Blake Boulevard which intersects SR 434 at a full median opening. In addition, a right in/out driveway will be provided on SR 434. Figure 1 depicts the location of the project site and the area roadways. Figure 2 depicts the proposed site plan. At the request of the City, this analysis consists of updating an earlier analysis conducted for Winter Springs Apartments (now known as Catalyst Apartments). That analysis was conducted in accordance with the City’s standard scope of work for a traffic study as included in Appendix A. The analysis considers the project’s impacts on the following roadways and intersections: Roadways SR 434 Central Winds Drive to Tuskawilla Road Tuskawilla Road to Michael Blake Boulevard Michael Blake Boulevard to Tuscora Drive Tuskawilla Road Trotwood Boulevard to SR 434 SR 434 to Blumberg Boulevard Michael Blake Boulevard SR 434 to Tuskawilla Road Intersections SR 434 & Doran Drive SR 434 & Tuskawilla Road SR 434 & Michael Blake Boulevard Data used in this analysis consists of site plan/development information provided by the Project Engineers, daily traffic volume data obtained from the Florida DOT and Seminole County, and A.M./P.M. peak hour traffic counts obtained by Traffic Planning and Design, Inc. 29 TuscoraDrSite LocationWinter Springs Town Center Condominiums5160Project №Figure 1NTSNSITESITE30 Proposed Site PlanNTSNRestaurantWinter Springs Town Center Commercial Outparcels4887Project №Figure 231 Winter Springs Town Center Commercial Outparcels Project № 4887 Page 4 EXISTING ROADWAY ANALYSIS Capacity analyses were performed for the study roadway segments and intersections for the existing traffic in order to establish their current operating conditions. The roadway segments were analyzed for daily conditions and the intersections for A.M. and P.M. peak hour conditions. Roadway Segment Analysis The study roadway segments were analyzed by comparing their existing traffic volumes with their respective capacities at the adopted LOS standard. For the SR 434 segments, the daily traffic volumes were obtained from the latest Florida Traffic Information 2015 (FTI) DVD and the respective capacities from the 2012 FDOT Quality/Level of Service Handbook. The volume on Tuskawilla Road, from SR 434 to Blumberg Boulevard, and on Michael Blake Boulevard, from SR 434 to Tuskawilla Road, were estimated from the peak hour intersection traffic counts. The A.M./P.M. peak hour volumes along the roadway segments were determined from counts made at the study intersections. Summaries of the daily and A.M./P.M. peak hour roadway capacity analyses are presented in Tables 1 and 2. The existing conditions analysis reveals that the study segments currently operate satisfactorily within their adopted LOS standards. Intersection Analysis A capacity analysis was conducted for each study intersection using Synchro software in accordance with the procedures of the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). The capacity analysis was performed using the existing intersection geometries, A.M./P.M. peak hour traffic volumes and signal timings. The A.M./P.M. peak hour volumes were determined from turning movement counts obtained by TPD and are included in Appendix B along with signal timing sheets provided by Seminole County. The existing intersection volumes are displayed in Figure 3. The intersection capacity analysis results are summarized in Table 3 and the Synchro analysis worksheets are included in Appendix C. 32 Winter Springs Town Center Commercial Outparcels Project № 4887 Page 5 Table 1 Existing Daily Roadway Capacity Analysis Roadway Segment No. of Lanes LOS Standard Daily Capacity (1) Existing Daily Volume (2) LOS SR 434 Central Winds Dr to Tuskawilla Rd 4LD E 39,800 33,000 C Tuskawilla Rd to Michael Blake Blvd 4LD E 39,800 25,500 C Michael Blake Blvd to Tuscora Dr 4LD E 39,800 25,500 C Tuskawilla Rd E. Lake Dr to SR 434 4LD E 35,820 29,000 C SR 434 to Blumberg Blvd 2LU D 13,320 5,344 (3) C Michael Blake Blvd SR 434 to Tuskawilla Rd 2LU D 13,320 1,122 (3) C (1) Based on FDOT's Generalized Service Volume Tables (2) Obtained from Florida Traffic Information DVD (3) Estimated from the intersection counts with the use of K=0.09 Table 2 Existing A.M./P.M. Peak Hour Roadway Capacity Analysis Roadway Segment No. of Lanes Adopted A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour LOS Standard Daily Capacity (1) Volume (2) Peak Dir LOS Volume Peak Dir LOS SR 434 Central Winds Dr to Tuskawilla Rd 4LD E 2,000 1,474 WB C 1,604 EB C Tuskawilla Rd to Michael Blake Blvd 4LD E 2,000 1,148 WB C 1,262 EB C Michael Blake Blvd to Tuscora Dr 4LD E 2,000 1,180 WB C 1,224 EB C Tuskawilla Rd Trotwood Blvd to SR 434 4LD E 1,800 724 NB C 749 SB C SR 434 to Blumberg Blvd 2L D 675 150 NB C 248 SB C Michael Blake Blvd SR 434 to Tuskawilla Rd 2L D 675 72 SB C 80 NB C (1) Based on FDOT's Generalized Service Volume Tables (2) Estimated from the intersection counts 33 Existing A.M./P.M.Peak Hour Traffic VolumesLegend:PM Peak HourAM Peak HourDoran DrSR 434Tuskawilla RdSR 4342 (0)75 (135)62 (113)34 (83)952 (882)149 (145)44 (41)882 (949)438 (469)520 (481)72 (109)132 (112)Michael BlakeBlvd25 (4)47 (14)6 (28)1,123 (1,128)23 (52)1,067 (1,210)00 (00)8 (34)0 (2)9 (8)16 (7)1,415 (1,290)5 (12)7 (11)1,194 (1,390)3 (15)16 (7)0 (0)14 (9)Winter Springs Town Center Commercial Outparcels4887Project №Figure 3NTSN34 Winter Springs Town Center Commercial Outparcels Project № 4887 Page 7 Table 3 Existing Intersection Capacity Analysis Intersection Control Period EB WB NB SB Overall Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS SR 434 & Doran Dr Signal A.M. 2.8 A 6.7 A 48.8 D 46.5 D 5.7 A P.M. 4.6 A 4.8 A 35.7 D 22.3 C 5.1 A SR 434 & Tuskawilla Rd Signal A.M. 44.3 D 47.4 D 49.5 D 85.7 F 48.2 D P.M. 28.4 C 29.6 C 75.3 E 106.8 F 43.7 D SR 434 & Michael Blake Blvd STOP A.M. 0.2 A 0.0 A - - 26.4 D - - P.M. 0.5 A 0.0 A - - 24.4 C - - The results of the intersection capacity analysis indicate that the all study intersections operate at satisfactory overall Levels of Service except for southbound approach at the intersection of SR 434 and Tuskawilla Road which operates at Level of service “F” during the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. This is due to the coordinated signal system which allocates maximum green time to the heavy traffic volumes and reduces the amount of green time for the minor streets resulting in lengthy delays. The volume-to-capacity ratio for this approach is below 1.0, which indicates that the LOS “F” is due to delay and not capacity deficiency. 35 Winter Springs Town Center Commercial Outparcels Project № 4887 Page 8 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND TRIP GENERATION To determine the impact of this development, an analysis of its trip generation characteristics was conducted. This included the determination of the trips to be generated as well as their distribution and assignment to the area roadways. Trip Generation The trip generation of the proposed development was calculated with the use of trip generation rates obtained from the 10th Edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual. Table 4 provides a summary of the trip generation calculation. The proposed development is projected to generate 2,422 new net daily trips, of which 279 will occur in the A.M. peak hour and 186 will occur in the P.M. peak hour. Table 4 Trip Generation Summary ITE Code Land Use Size (KSF) (1) Daily A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Rate Trips Rate Enter Exit Total Rate Enter Exit Total 912 Drive-in Bank (Chase Bank) 3.470 100.03 347 9.5 19 14 33 20.45 36 35 71 937 Coffee Shop w/ Drive Through 2.500 820.38 2,051 88.99 114 109 223 43.38 55 54 109 934 Fast Food w/ Drive Through 2.163 470.95 1,019 40.19 44 43 87 32.67 37 34 71 820 Retail 7.200 139.58 1,005 21.52 96 59 155 10.83 37 41 78 Totals 4,422 273 225 498 165 164 329 Drive-in Bank Pass-by Trips (29% AM/35% PM) 122 6 4 10 13 12 25 Coffee Shop Pass-by Trips (50%) 1,026 57 55 112 28 27 55 Fast Food Pass-by Trips (50%) 510 22 22 44 19 17 36 Retail Pass-by Trips (34%) 342 33 20 53 13 14 27 Total Pass-by Trips 2,000 118 101 219 73 70 143 Net New Project Trips 2,422 155 124 279 92 94 186 (1) KSF = 1,000 square feet 36 Winter Springs Town Center Commercial Outparcels Project № 4887 Page 9 Trip Distribution/Trip Assignment The proposed distribution pattern was estimated using MetroPlan’s year 2020 LRTP of the OUATS model. The model generated distribution was reviewed for reasonableness and slightly modified in consideration of local traffic conditions. The modified distribution is shown in Figure 4 and a model distribution plot is included in Appendix D. With this distribution pattern, the project trips were assigned to the area roadways as shown in Figure 5. 37 Trip DistributionNTS39%SITESITE6%18%37%29%8%57%39%6%Winter Springs Town Center Commercial Outparcels4887Project №Figure 4N38 SITETrip AssignmentNTSN000A.M. Peak Hour Trips(000)P.M. Peak Hour Trips000 Daily TripsLegend:60 ( 3 6) 945 36 (27)45 (27)7(6)9 (6)14522 (17)28 (17)43610 (8)12 (7)19448 ( 3 7)702SITE58 (3 4) 46 (3 5) 896 71 ( 5 4) 88 (5 2) 1,38 1 Winter Springs Town Center Commercial Outparcels4887Project №Figure 560 ( 3 6) 945 48 ( 3 7)7(6)9(6)14539 Winter Springs Town Center Commercial Outparcels Project № 4887 Page 12 PROJECTED TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Projected traffic conditions for the project buildout were analyzed using daily traffic volumes for the roadway segments and A.M./P.M. peak hour traffic volumes for the intersections. The projected traffic volumes used in the analysis consisted of background traffic volumes combined with traffic from Tuskawilla Crossings and Integra Winter Springs developments and the proposed project trips. Background traffic volumes were estimated with the use of a growth factor of 1.04 for a two-year growth and combined with the Catalyst Apartment traffic. The traffic volumes for each of the Tuskawilla Crossings, Integra Winter springs and Catalyst Apartments developments are included in Appendix E. Roadway Segment Analysis A roadway segment analysis was performed for the study roadway segments by comparing the projected traffic volumes of the segments with their respective capacities at the adopted LOS standards. The daily, A.M. and P.M. peak hour analyses are summarized in Tables 5, 6 and 7. The results of the analysis show that the study roadway segments will continue to operate within their adopted capacity in the projected conditions. Table 5 Projected Daily Roadway Capacity Analysis Roadway Segment No. of Lanes Adopted Projected Daily Volume Projected LOS LOS Sta. Daily Capacity Future Vol* Catalyst Apartments Integra Tuskawilla Crossings Project Trips Total SR 434 Central Winds Dr to Tuskawilla Rd 4LD E 39,800 34,320 890 1,809 1,567 945 39,531 D Tuskawilla Rd to Michael Blake Blvd 4LD E 39,800 26,520 1,020 3,214 1,828 1,381 33,963 C Michael Blake Blvd to Tuscora Dr 4LD E 39,800 26,520 390 3,214 1,828 896 32,848 C Tuskawilla Rd Trotwood Blvd to SR 434 4LD E 35,820 30,160 427 605 1,306 436 32,934 C SR 434 to Blumberg Blvd 2LU D 13,320 5,558 148 495 522 0 6,723 D Michael Blake Blvd SR 434 to Tuskawilla Rd 2LU D 13,320 1,167 1,224 220 266 145 3,022 C * Existing Volume X 1.04 40 Winter Springs Town Center Commercial Outparcels Project № 4887 Page 13 Table 6 Projected A.M. Peak Hour Roadway Capacity Analysis Roadway Segment No. of Lanes Adopted Projected A.M. PHPD Volume Projected LOS LOS Sta. Daily Capacity Future Vol* Catalyst Apartments Integra Tuskawilla Crossings Project Trips Total SR 434 Central Winds Dr to Tuskawilla Rd 4LD E 2,000 1,533 55 43 65 48 1,744 C Tuskawilla Rd to Michael Blake Blvd 4LD E 2,000 1,194 63 68 49 71 1,445 C Michael Blake Blvd to Tuscora Dr 4LD E 2,000 1,227 24 68 49 57 1,426 C Tuskawilla Rd Trotwood Blvd to SR 434 4LD E 1,800 753 26 25 50 28 882 C SR 434 to Blumberg Blvd 2L D 675 156 9 2 17 0 184 C Michael Blake Blvd SR 434 to Tuskawilla Rd 2L D 675 75 75 1 4 9 164 C * Existing Volume X 1.04 Table 7 Projected P.M. Peak Hour Roadway Capacity Analysis Roadway Segment No. of Lanes Adopted Projected A.M. PHPD Volume Projected LOS LOS Standard Daily Capacity Future Vol* Catalyst Apartments Integra Tuskawilla Crossings Project Trips Total SR 434 Central Winds Dr to Tuskawilla Rd 4LD E 2,000 1,668 54 60 78 36 1,896 C Tuskawilla Rd to Michael Blake Blvd 4LD E 2,000 1,312 62 92 60 52 1,579 C Michael Blake Blvd to Tuscora Dr 4LD E 2,000 1,273 24 93 72 35 1,497 C Tuskawilla Rd Trotwood Blvd to SR 434 4LD E 1,800 779 26 36 52 17 910 C SR 434 to Blumberg Blvd 2L D 675 258 9 3 13 0 283 C Michael Blake Blvd SR 434 to Tuskawilla Rd 2L D 675 83 74 1 3 6 167 C * Existing Volume X 1.04 41 Winter Springs Town Center Commercial Outparcels Project № 4887 Page 14 Intersection Analysis To assess the projected operating conditions at the study intersections, intersection capacity analyses were conducted using projected traffic volumes. The intersections were analyzed using the Synchro Software in accordance with the procedures of the Highway Capacity 6E Manual. Projected peak hour volumes were similarly calculated by applying a growth factor to existing volumes and adding the Catalyst Apartments, Tuskawilla Crossings, Integra Winter Springs and project trips. Figures 6 and 7 show the projected peak hour intersection turning volumes for the study intersections. The projected Levels of Service are summarized in Table 8. The analysis shows that the study intersections will operate at acceptable overall Levels of Service in the projected conditions except for the southbound approach at the intersection of SR 434 and Tuskawilla Road. Similar to the existing conditions analysis, this approach will operate at LOS “F” due to the coordinated signal timing which favors the heavy traffic volumes on SR 434 reducing the amount of green time on the minor streets. The v/c ratio remains below 1.0 which indicates that the LOS “F” is due to delay, not capacity deficiency. In addition, the minor approaches at the intersection of SR 434 and Michael Blake Boulevard, which will become a four-legged intersection, are projected to operate at LOS “F” due to the addition of traffic from the Integra Winter Springs, Tuskawilla Crossings and the proposed project trips. This intersection be should be considered for signalization with the addition of development trips as documented herein. With signalization, the intersection will operate at satisfactory Levels of Service. Detailed printouts of each intersection capacity analysis are included in Appendix F. 42 Projected A.M. Peak HourTraffic VolumesDoran DrSR 434Tuskawilla RdMichael Blake BlvdSite Access 2(9)150+{2}=152(7)[76]+(82)=158[88]+(117)=20548+{4}=52809171,527+<43>+{65}+(48)=1,683571,255+<52>+{24}+(60)=1,3913170151187+{17}=10465+<2>=6735+<2>=371,037+<43>+{43}+(48)=1,171172+<22>+{4}+(23)=22148928+<52>+{16}+(60)=1,056456+{8}=464541+{22}=56377+{17}=94141+<25>+{11}+(28)=20577+[25]+(36)=138{2}73+<1>+[51]+(46)=1719+<1>+[29]+(29)=681,171+<68>+{37}-[29]+(29)=1,276{12}39+[59]+(88)=1861,110+<80>+{23}-[59]=1,154{4}Site Access 13+[30]+(29)=621,245+<68>+{48}-[30]+(36)=1,36712+[26]+(35)=731,149+<80>+{27}+(88)=1,344Legend:00+<00>+{00}+[00]+(00)=00Total TrafficProject TrafficPass-by TrafficTuskawilla Crossings TrafficIntegra Winter Springs TrafficBackground Traffic(Existing X 1.04 + Catalyst Apt){11}{4}{32}SR 434Winter Springs Town Center Commercial Outparcels4887Project №Figure 6NTSN43 Projected P.M. Peak HourTraffic VolumesDoran DrSR 434Tuskawilla RdMichael Blake BlvdSite Access 2(6)59+{5}=64(6)[53]+(62)=115[55]+(69)=124157+{3}=160352871,371+<73>+{49}+(37)=1,53013111,500+<60>+{78}+(36)=1,674167090145+{13}=158123+<3>=12686+<3>=89941+<73>+{33}+(37)=1,084160+<36>+{13}+(17)=226521,032+<60>+{52}+(36)=1,180488+{26}=514500+{16}=516122+{13}=135134+<29>+{8}+(17)=18831+[18]+(27)=76{5}28+<1>+[35]+(35)=9941+<1>+[18]+(17)=771,185+<113>+{38}-[18]+(17)=1,335{38}116+[37]+(52)=2051,258+<92>+{47}-[37]=1,360{13}Site Access 112+[18]+(17)=471,204+<113>+{46}-[18]+(27)=1,3726+[17]+(27)=501,347+<92>+{60}+(52)=1,551Legend:00+<00>+{00}+[00]+(00)=00{8}{3}{25}SR 434Winter Springs Town Center Commercial Outparcels4887Project №Figure 7NTSNTotal TrafficProject TrafficPass-by TrafficTuskawilla Crossings TrafficIntegra Winter Springs TrafficBackground Traffic(Existing X 1.04 + Catalyst Apt) 44 Winter Springs Town Center Commercial Outparcels Project № 4887 Page 17 Table 8 Projected Intersection Capacity Analysis Intersection Control Period EB WB NB SB Overall Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS SR 434 & Doran Dr Signal A.M. 3.7 A 4.7 A 49.0 D 46.4 D 4.9 A P.M. 5.6 A 4.6 A 35.7 D 22.8 C 5.5 A SR 434 & Tuskawilla Rd Signal A.M. 52.1 D 52.3 D 62.0 E 85.5 F 55.8 E P.M. 42.4 D 52.8 D 79.1 E 93.2 F 56.4 E SR 434 & Michael Blake Blvd STOP A.M. 2.5 A 0.1 A ** F ** F P.M. 2.7 A 0.4 A ** F ** F - - Signal A.M. 36.1 D 51.7 D 13.2 B 36.3 D 42.7 D P.M. 39.2 D 50.5 D 14.1 B 29.9 C 43.5 D Site Access @ SR 434 (right in/out) STOP A.M. - - 0.0 A - - 18.8 C - - P.M. - - 0.0 A - - 17.5 C - - Site Access 2 @ Michael Blake Blvd (full) STOP A.M. 10.6 B - - 6.4 A 0.0 A - - P.M. 9.5 A - - 3.3 A 0.0 A - - ** Excessive Delays 45 Winter Springs Town Center Commercial Outparcels Project № 4887 Page 18 Turn Lane Analysis a) Right Turn Lane: The need for a right turn lane was evaluated at the intersection of SR 434 and Michael Blake Boulevard and at the site access. As per Section 9-206 of the City Code, a right turn deceleration lane should be provided if the projected right turning volume is equal to or greater than 40 vehicles per hour for a four-lane roadway with a posted speed limit greater than 45 mph. The projected volume on SR 434 turning right into Michael Blake Boulevard is 68 vehicles during the A.M. peak hour and 77 during the P.M. peak hour. Therefore, an exclusive right turn lane is required at this location. The recommended length of this right turn lane is recommended to be 350 feet as per the FDOT Index 301 for a design speed of 55 mph. The site access is located west of Michael Blake Boulevard, where the speed limit drops to 45 mph. As per Section 9-206 of the City Code, a right turn deceleration lane should be provided if the projected right turning volume is equal to or greater than 110 vehicles per hour for a four-lane roadway with a posted speed limit 45 mph or less. The projected right turning volume on SR 434 at the site access is 62 vehicles during the A.M. peak hour and 47 during the P.M. peak hour. Therefore, a right turn lane is not needed at this location. b) Left Turn Lane: A left turn lane analysis was conducted to determine the adequacy of the existing left turn lane at the SR 434/Michael Blake Boulevard intersection. This was accomplished utilizing the 95th percentile queue length obtained from the Synchro intersection analysis for the projected conditions and deceleration distance obtained from FDOT’s Index 301. The required turn lane length calculated using the following equation: Left Turn Lane Length (TL) = Deceleration Distance (DD) + Queue Length (QL) Table 9 summarizes the turn lane length available and required at the study intersection. As can be seen, the existing available turn lane at the intersection of SR 434 and Michael Blake Boulevard will be adequate to serve the project trips. Table 9 Required Turn Lane Length Calculation Approach Design Speed (mph) Decel. Distance (ft) Available Length (ft) Peak Hour 95th %ile BOQ (ft) Required TL Length (ft) EBL 50 240 375 A.M. 52.5 292.5 P.M. 68 308 46 Winter Springs Town Center Commercial Outparcels Project № 4887 Page 19 STUDY CONCLUSIONS This traffic analysis was performed to assess the impact of the proposed development of commercial outparcels located in the northwest quadrant of SR 434 and Michael Blake Boulevard in Winter Springs, Florida. The proposed development will consist of a drive-in bank and three restaurants, two of which will have drive-through windows. Access to the site will be provided via Michael Blake Boulevard which intersects SR 434 at a full median opening. In addition, a right in/out driveway will be provided on SR 434. The results of the study as documented herein are summarized below: o The proposed development will generate a total daily traffic volume of 2,422 new net daily trips, of which 279 will occur in the A.M. peak hour and 186 will occur in the P.M. peak hour. o The study roadway segments currently operate at adequate Levels of Service and will continue to operate at satisfactory Levels of Service when project trips are added. o The study roadway intersections currently operate at satisfactory overall Levels of Service except for southbound approach at the intersection of SR 434 and Tuskawilla Road which operates at Level of service “F” during the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. This is due to the coordinated signal system which allocates maximum green time to the heavy traffic volumes and reduces the amount of green time for the minor streets resulting in lengthy delays. The volume-to-capacity ratio for this approach is below 1.0, which indicates that the LOS “F” is due to delay, not capacity deficiency. o The study intersections will continue to operate at acceptable overall Levels of Service in the projected conditions except for the southbound approach at the intersection of SR 434 and Tuskawilla Road. Similar to the existing conditions analysis, this approach will operate at LOS “F” due to the coordinated signal timing which favors the heavy traffic volumes on SR 434 reducing the amount of green time on the minor streets. The v/c ratio remains below 1.0 which indicates that the LOS “F” is due to delay, not capacity deficiency. 47 Winter Springs Town Center Commercial Outparcels Project № 4887 Page 20 In addition, the minor approaches at the intersection of SR 434 and Michael Blake Boulevard, which will become a four-legged intersection, are projected to operate at LOS “F” due to the addition of traffic from the Integra Winter Springs, Tuskawilla Crossings and the proposed project trips. This intersection should be considered for signalization when warranted. o At the intersection of SR 434 and Michael Blake Boulevard, a 350-foot long westbound right turn lane is recommended. The length of the existing eastbound left turn lane on SR 434 is adequate for the projected traffic volumes. 48 APPENDICES 49 APPENDIX A City of Winter Springs Standard Scope of Work for a Traffic Study 50 From: Brian Fields Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 10:39 AM To: 'Anthony Everett' Cc: Randy Stevenson; Bobby Howell; Michael Derbaum Subject: RE: ACOE Permit Compliance Package Anthony, Please find attached our standard scope for a traffic study. For your project, based on an apartment complex with up to 350 units, the study should include the following in addition to the standard scope: Roadway segments to analyze: SR 434 in separate segments from Central Winds Drive to Tuskawilla Road, from Tuskawilla Road to Michael Blake Blvd, and from Michael Blake Boulevard to Tuscora Drive Michael Blake Boulevard Tuskawilla Road from Trotwood to SR 434 and from SR 434 to Blumberg Blvd Intersections to analyze: SR 434 at Central Winds Drive SR 434 at Doran Drive SR 434 at Tuskawilla Road SR 434 at Michael Blake Blvd SR 434 at Tuscora Drive Additional items to analyze: Warrant for right‐turn deceleration land on SR 434 westbound at Michael Blake Boulevard Adequacy of left turn storage on SR 434 eastbound at Michael Blake Boulevard Lane configuration and turn storage on Michael Blake Blvd southbound at SR 434 Feel free to have your traffic engineer contact me with any questions. Brian Fields, P.E. City Engineer City of Winter Springs 407‐327‐7597 (office) 321‐388‐2757 (cell) 51 From: Brian Fields [mailto:bfields@winterspringsfl.org] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 3:43 PM To: Turgut Dervish Subject: Winter Springs Apartments Turgut, Please find the information attached and listed below regarding the Winter Springs Apartments traffic study requirements. Regarding the parking analysis (if this is part of your scope), the following is from the Town Center Code, Section 20‐324: There shall be no minimum parking requirement in the town center. The applicant shall provide a parking analysis justifying the proposed parking solution. The level of detail required for the parking analysis shall be determined in consultation with the DRC early-on in the development process. In general, the parking analysis shall include a detailed analysis and calculation of the normal and peak parking demands for a development. The usage of standard parking generation rates is normally not acceptable for this purpose. The best source of data is field parking counts from similar developments in the area. Factors to consider when calculating the overall parking demand include, but are not limited to: • Size and usage of the development/number of units • Availability and proximity of mass transit • Demographics of the expected user group • Availability and expected use of bicycle and pedestrian facilities • Surrounding land use Factors to consider when determining the number of parking spaces to be provided include, but are not limited to: • Number of parking spaces to be reserved and/or restricted • Availability and proximity of overflow parking areas • Mix of the type of parking spaces available, including private garages, private driveways, public surface parking, public on-street parking, metered parking, etc. • Management strategies for the usage of visitor/overflow parking spaces • Opportunity to share parking with surrounding properties Enclosed garages in individual residential units are often not used to their full parking capacity. In recognition of this, the number of parking spaces considered to be available in enclosed garages shall be calculated at fifty (50) percent of the actual parking capacity. For example, a two-car garage would be considered to have 1.0 parking spaces, and a one-car garage would have 0.5 parking spaces. 52 APPENDIX B Intersection Counts and Signal Timing Data 53 City:Winter SpringsCounty:SeminoleStudy Period:A.M.13% 0% 11%809160%14153%50%0%73%11940%316 0 140% 0% 0% % = Percentage of Trucks / TotalLeft Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right8 0 7 5 1369 16 16 0 14 7 1161 3 26061 0104600000330819 0 8 5 1415 16 16 0 14 7 1194 3 2687toLeft Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right2 1302954703325905774 1603322808221405771 0013945008329507072 0103684802128726753 0523395503027406363 0223142301333816692 0122812802231036133 0412584505336616508:30:00 AM8:45:00 AM7:00:00 AM7:15:00 AM7:30:00 AM7:45:00 AM8:00:00 AM8:15:00 AMPeak Hour07:30 AM to 08:30 AMTotal Vehicle TrafficInterval StartsSouthbound Westbound Northbound EastboundTotalCarsTrucksTotalPeak Hour Factor 0.950 McCleod's Way / Doran Drive Peak Hour TrafficSouthbound Westbound Northbound EastboundTotalSR 434Date:E/W Street Name:N/S Street Name:McCleod's Way / Doran Drive SR 4341‐Oct‐15SR 434McCleod's Way / Doran Drive54 Date:1‐Oct‐15City:Winter SpringsE/W Street Name:SR 434County:SeminoleN/S Street Name:McCleod's Way / Doran DriveStudy Period:A.M.Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right7:00:00 AM2 1 302954703325905777:15:00 AM4 1 603322808221405777:30:00 AM1 0 013945008329507077:45:00 AM2 0 1 0 368 48021 287 26758:00:00 AM3 0 523395503027406368:15:00 AM3 0 223142301333816698:30:00 AM2 0 122812802231036138:45:00 AM3 0 41258450533661650Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right7:00:00 AM2 1 302934703325205687:15:00 AM4 1 503262808220105577:30:00 AM1 0 013845008328706897:45:00 AM2 0 103524802128226548:00:00 AM2 0 423305503026406158:15:00 AM3 0 223032301332816488:30:00 AM2 0 122742802230025958:45:00 AM2 0 41250450533571632Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right7:00:00 AM0 0 002000007097:15:00 AM0 0 10600000130207:30:00 AM0 0 00100000080187:45:00 AM0 0 0 0 16 0000050218:00:00 AM1 0 10900000100218:15:00 AM0 0 001100000100218:30:00 AM0 0 00700000101188:45:00 AM1 0 008000009018Truck TrafficInterval StartsSouthbound Westbound Northbound EastboundTotalCar TrafficInterval StartsSouthbound Westbound Northbound EastboundTotalTotal Vehicle TrafficInterval StartsSouthbound Westbound Northbound EastboundTotal55 City:Winter SpringsCounty:SeminoleStudy Period:P.M.0% 0% 0%34 2 870%12903%120%0%112%13900%157090% 0% 0% % = Percentage of Trucks / TotalLeft Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right8 2 34 12 12487709111365 15 27180 0004200000250678 2 34 12 12907709111390 15 2785toLeft Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right3 0662692203226825630 0682732202132826243 0742797701331936330 0533323301232936814 1843082204436237022 0523342203235837132 11633160001334166894 154257660151562447SR 434Date:E/W Street Name:N/S Street Name:McCleod's Way / Doran Drive SR 43430‐Sep‐15SR 434McCleod's Way / Doran DriveMcCleod's Way / Doran Drive Peak Hour TrafficSouthbound Westbound Northbound EastboundTotalCarsTrucksTotalPeak Hour Factor 0.977Peak Hour04:45 AM to 05:45 AMTotal Vehicle TrafficInterval StartsSouthbound Westbound Northbound EastboundTotal5:30:00 AM5:45:00 AM4:00:00 AM4:15:00 AM4:30:00 AM4:45:00 AM5:00:00 AM5:15:00 AM56 Date:30‐Sep‐15City:Winter SpringsE/W Street Name:SR 434County:SeminoleN/S Street Name:McCleod's Way / Doran DriveStudy Period:P.M.Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right4:00:00 AM3 0 662692203226825634:15:00 AM0 0 682732202132826244:30:00 AM3 0 742797701331936334:45:00 AM0 0 5 3 33233012 329 36815:00:00 AM4 1 843082204436237025:15:00 AM2 0 523342203235837135:30:00 AM2 11633160001334166895:45:00 AM4 1 54257660151562447Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right4:00:00 AM3 0 662421203226525324:15:00 AM0 0 682662202132226114:30:00 AM3 0 642687701331236144:45:00 AM0 0 533123301231536475:00:00 AM4 1 843002204435636885:15:00 AM2 0 523252203235737035:30:00 AM2 11633110001333766805:45:00 AM4 1 54252660151552441Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right4:00:00 AM0 0 00271000030314:15:00 AM0 0 0070000060134:30:00 AM0 0 10110000070194:45:00 AM0 0 0 0 20 00000140345:00:00 AM0 0 0080000060145:15:00 AM0 0 0090000010105:30:00 AM0 0 005000004095:45:00 AM0 0 00500000106Total Vehicle TrafficInterval StartsSouthbound Westbound Northbound EastboundTotalCar TrafficInterval StartsSouthbound Westbound Northbound EastboundTotalTruck TrafficInterval StartsSouthbound Westbound Northbound EastboundTotal57 58 All Vehicles 7:00 to 9:00 15-007.01 Left Through Right Left Through Right 7:00 - 7:15 145 108 26 22 32 0 7:15 - 7:30 83 15 26 35 52 1 7:30 - 7:45 150 17 40 11 26 0 7:45 - 8:00 120 19 45 16 21 0 8:00 - 8:15 120 15 32 19 18 0 8:15 - 8:30 158 18 29 12 11 2 8:30 - 8:45 122 20 26 15 25 0 8:45 - 9:00 116 24 32 18 28 0 1,014 236 256 148 213 3 Left Through Right Left Through Right 7:00 - 7:15 23 136 68 12 171 20 7:15 - 7:30 8 212 88 21 206 6 7:30 - 7:45 10 192 87 24 232 3 7:45 - 8:00 10 213 110 54 258 6 8:00 - 8:15 8 225 87 18 238 13 8:15 - 8:30 11 216 104 32 231 58:30 - 8:45 15 228 137 45 225 10 8:45 - 9:00 5 134 124 32 164 18 90 1,556 805 238 1,725 81 27562 34 Tuskawilla Rd.952 149 SR 434 7:45 - 8:45 44 882 438 520 72 132 Time Period Date Intersection Tuskawilla Rd. January 15, 2015 Roadway Count Summary GMB Engineers & Planners, Inc. SouthboundNorthbound 3,362 WestboundEastbound North / South East / West Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 0.96 Total Pk Hr Voume Time Period & Time Period GMB Project #: County Winter SpringsSeminoleCity SR 434 59 & 7:00 to 9:00 15-007.01 Left Through Right Left Through Right 7:00-7:15 200 0007:15 - 7:30 3 0 0 1 0 07:30 - 7:45 3 0 1 0 1 0 7:45 - 8:00 4 0 1 2 0 0 8:00-8:15 300 000 8:15-8:30 200 000 8:30 - 8:45 4 0 0 0 1 0 8:45 - 9:00 7 2 0 1 0 0 Left Through Right Left Through Right 7:00 - 7:15 0 5 1 0 3 1 7:15 - 7:30 0 8 3 1 4 0 7:30 - 7:45 0 8 5 0 7 0 7:45 - 8:00 0 5 1 0 2 0 8:00 - 8:15 0 6 0 0 6 1 8:15 - 8:30 1 8 1 1 5 0 8:30 - 8:45 1 7 3 1 8 0 8:45 - 9:00 0 9 1 0 2 0 0.0% 1.3% 3.2%2.9% Tuskawilla Rd. 2.2% SR 434 1.3% 7:45 - 8:45 4.5% 2.9% 1.1%2.5% 0.0% 0.8% SR 434 Westbound GMB Project #: Time Period Northbound Southbound Eastbound Roadway Count Summary GMB Engineers & Planners, Inc. Intersection Time Period Date Tuskawilla Rd. January 15, 2015 County Seminole Winter Springs Trucks City North / South East / West Peak Hour Time Period 60 & 7:00 to 9:00 15-007.01 Left Through Right Left Through Right 7:00-7:15 0010 000 7:15-7:30 0011 000 7:30 - 7:45 1 0 28 0 0 0 7:45 - 8:00 0 0 26 0 0 08:00-8:15 0023 0008:15-8:30 0018 0008:30 - 8:45 0 0 19 0 0 0 8:45 - 9:00 0 0 25 0 0 0 Left Through Right Left Through Right 7:00 - 7:15 0 0 41 0 0 4 7:15-7:30 0026 000 7:30 - 7:45 0 0 22 2 0 0 7:45 - 8:00 1 0 36 2 0 0 8:00 - 8:15 0 0 33 0 0 18:15 - 8:30 0 0 52 1 0 18:30 - 8:45 0 0 54 1 0 08:45 - 9:00 0 0 65 1 0 1 000 2 Tuskawilla Rd. 0 SR 434 4 7:45 - 8:45 1 0 175 0 0 86 Roadway Count Summary GMB Engineers & Planners, Inc. Intersection Time Period Date County Seminole Winter SpringsCity Northbound Westbound North / South East / West Peak Hour Time Period Time Period Tuskawilla Rd.SR 434 January 15, 2015 Southbound Eastbound GMB Project #: U-Turn & RTOR 61 All Vehicles 16:00 to 18:00 15-007.01 Left Through Right Left Through Right 16:00 - 16:15 157 31 53 26 37 0 16:15 - 16:30 151 48 28 15 35 1 16:30 - 16:45 125 27 27 31 33 1 16:45 - 17:00 118 26 23 18 36 0 17:00 - 17:15 121 24 31 37 28 0 17:15 - 17:30 122 28 28 25 42 0 17:30 - 17:45 120 31 30 33 29 0 17:45 - 18:00 94 40 31 28 43 0 1,008 255 251 213 283 2 Left Through Right Left Through Right 16:00 - 16:15 11 168 81 27 184 7 16:15 - 16:30 9 167 65 20 176 18 16:30 - 16:45 7 207 73 25 202 16 16:45 - 17:00 18 204 126 42 200 14 17:00 - 17:15 6 205 116 35 205 11 17:15 - 17:30 10 289 119 29 226 2817:30 - 17:45 7 251 108 39 251 30 17:45 - 18:00 7 204 91 38 199 28 75 1,695 779 255 1,643 152 0 135 113 83 Tuskawilla Rd.882 145 SR 434 16:45 - 17:45 41 949 469 481 109 112 Time Period Date Intersection Tuskawilla Rd. January 15, 2015 Roadway Count Summary GMB Engineers & Planners, Inc. SouthboundNorthbound 3,519 WestboundEastbound North / South East / West Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 0.93 Total Pk Hr Voume Time Period & Time Period GMB Project #: County Winter SpringsSeminoleCity SR 434 62 & 16:00 to 18:00 15-007.01 Left Through Right Left Through Right 16:00 - 16:15 7 1 2 0 0 016:15 - 16:30 4 0 0 0 0 016:30 - 16:45 8 0 0 0 1 0 16:45 - 17:00 4 0 0 1 1 0 17:00 - 17:15 4 1 1 1 0 0 17:15 - 17:30 3 0 0 0 0 0 17:30 - 17:45 1 0 0 0 0 0 17:45 - 18:00 1 1 0 0 0 0 Left Through Right Left Through Right 16:00 - 16:15 0 4 0 0 13 0 16:15 - 16:30 0 6 1 0 5 0 16:30 - 16:45 0 9 0 0 27 0 16:45 - 17:00 0 5 1 0 19 0 17:00 - 17:15 1 2 0 2 9 0 17:15 - 17:30 0 5 3 0 3 0 17:30 - 17:45 0 4 1 0 3 0 17:45 - 18:00 0 5 2 0 3 0 0.0% 0.7% 1.8%0.0% Tuskawilla Rd. 3.9% SR 434 1.4% 16:45 - 17:45 2.4% 1.7% 1.1%2.5% 0.9% 0.9% SR 434 Westbound GMB Project #: Time Period Northbound Southbound Eastbound Roadway Count Summary GMB Engineers & Planners, Inc. Intersection Time Period Date Tuskawilla Rd. January 15, 2015 County Seminole Winter Springs Trucks City North / South East / West Peak Hour Time Period 63 & 16:00 to 18:00 15-007.01 Left Through Right Left Through Right 16:00 - 16:15 0 0 37 0 0 0 16:15 - 16:30 0 0 19 0 0 0 16:30 - 16:45 1 0 19 0 0 0 16:45 - 17:00 0 0 13 0 0 017:00 - 17:15 0 0 22 0 0 017:15 - 17:30 0 0 19 0 0 017:30 - 17:45 0 0 23 0 0 0 17:45 - 18:00 1 0 22 0 0 0 Left Through Right Left Through Right 16:00 - 16:15 0 0 0 1 0 0 16:15 - 16:30 0 0 0 2 0 1 16:30 - 16:45 0 0 1 1 0 1 16:45 - 17:00 0 0 0 1 0 1 17:00 - 17:15 0 0 0 3 0 117:15-17:30 000 00017:30-17:45 000 00017:45 - 18:00 0 0 0 1 0 3 000 2 Tuskawilla Rd. 0 SR 434 4 16:45 - 17:45 0 0 00077 Roadway Count Summary GMB Engineers & Planners, Inc. Intersection Time Period Date County Seminole Winter SpringsCity Northbound Westbound North / South East / West Peak Hour Time Period Time Period Tuskawilla Rd.SR 434 January 15, 2015 Southbound Eastbound GMB Project #: U-Turn & RTOR 64 65 All Vehicles 7:00 to 9:00 15-007.01 Left Through Right Left Through Right 7:00-7:15 000 1513 7:15-7:30 000 1102 7:30 - 7:45 0 0 0 13 0 11 7:45 - 8:00 0 0 0 13 0 10 8:00-8:15 000 1002 8:15 - 8:30 0 0 0 13 0 1 8:30-8:45 000 1100 8:45 - 9:00 0 0 0 8 0 3 000 94132 Left Through Right Left Through Right 7:00 - 7:15 20 176 0 0 230 34 7:15 - 7:30 3 277 0 0 250 3 7:30 - 7:45 7 251 0 0 271 2 7:45 - 8:00 8 264 0 0 319 1 8:00 - 8:15 5 275 0 0 283 0 8:15 - 8:30 2 246 0 0 270 48:30 - 8:45 7 265 0 0 270 1 8:45 - 9:00 1 185 0 1 222 0 53 1,939 0 1 2,115 45 25 0 47 6 Michael Blake Blvd 1,123 0 SR 434 7:15 - 8:15 23 1,067 0 000 Time Period Date Intersection Michael Blake Blvd January 15, 2015 Roadway Count Summary GMB Engineers & Planners, Inc. SouthboundNorthbound 2,291 WestboundEastbound North / South East / West Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 0.93 Total Pk Hr Voume Time Period & Time Period GMB Project #: County Winter SpringsSeminoleCity SR 434 66 & 7:00 to 9:00 15-007.01 Left Through Right Left Through Right 7:00-7:15 000 0007:15-7:30 000 0007:30 - 7:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 - 8:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:00-8:15 000 000 8:15-8:30 000 000 8:30 - 8:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:45 - 9:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 Left Through Right Left Through Right 7:00 - 7:15 0 6 0 0 4 0 7:15 - 7:30 0 7 0 0 4 0 7:30 - 7:45 0 5 0 0 5 1 7:45 - 8:00 0 7 0 0 4 0 8:00 - 8:15 0 10 0 0 4 0 8:15 - 8:30 0 6 0 0 1 0 8:30 - 8:45 0 6 0 0 7 0 8:45 - 9:00 0 8 0 1 2 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%16.7% Michael Blake Blvd 1.5% SR 434 0.0% 7:15 - 8:15 0.0% 2.7% 0.0%0.0% 0.0% 0.0% SR 434 Westbound GMB Project #: Time Period Northbound Southbound Eastbound Roadway Count Summary GMB Engineers & Planners, Inc. Intersection Time Period Date Michael Blake Blvd January 15, 2015 County Seminole Winter Springs Trucks City North / South East / West Peak Hour Time Period 67 & 7:00 to 9:00 15-007.01 Left Through Right Left Through Right 7:00-7:15 000 000 7:15-7:30 000 000 7:30-7:45 000 000 7:45-8:00 000 0008:00-8:15 000 0008:15-8:30 000 0008:30-8:45 000 000 8:45-9:00 000 000 Left Through Right Left Through Right 7:00-7:15 300 000 7:15-7:30 100 000 7:30-7:45 200 000 7:45-8:00 100 000 8:00-8:15 300 0008:15-8:30 200 0008:30-8:45 600 0008:45-9:00 000 000 000 0 Michael Blake Blvd 0 SR 434 0 7:15 - 8:15 7 0 0 000 Roadway Count Summary GMB Engineers & Planners, Inc. Intersection Time Period Date County Seminole Winter SpringsCity Northbound Westbound North / South East / West Peak Hour Time Period Time Period Michael Blake Blvd SR 434 January 15, 2015 Southbound Eastbound GMB Project #: U-Turn & RTOR 68 All Vehicles 16:00 to 18:00 15-007.01 Left Through Right Left Through Right 16:00 - 16:15 0 0 0 2 0 0 16:15 - 16:30 0 0 0 3 0 1 16:30 - 16:45 0 0 0 5 0 0 16:45 - 17:00 0 0 0 1 0 3 17:00 - 17:15 0 0 0 5 0 1 17:15 - 17:30 0 0 0 1 0 0 17:30 - 17:45 0 0 0 2 0 2 17:45 - 18:00 0 0 0 6 0 1 000 2508 Left Through Right Left Through Right 16:00 - 16:15 8 249 0 0 218 5 16:15 - 16:30 4 218 0 0 216 10 16:30 - 16:45 11 261 0 0 230 9 16:45 - 17:00 13 254 0 0 247 13 17:00 - 17:15 11 276 1 0 272 3 17:15 - 17:30 12 344 0 0 282 717:30 - 17:45 11 331 0 0 313 9 17:45 - 18:00 18 258 0 0 261 9 88 2,191 1 0 2,039 65 4014 28 Michael Blake Blvd 1,128 0 SR 434 17:00 - 18:00 52 1,209 1 000 Time Period Date Intersection Michael Blake Blvd January 15, 2015 Roadway Count Summary GMB Engineers & Planners, Inc. SouthboundNorthbound 2,436 WestboundEastbound North / South East / West Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 0.91 Total Pk Hr Voume Time Period & Time Period GMB Project #: County Winter SpringsSeminoleCity SR 434 69 & 16:00 to 18:00 15-007.01 Left Through Right Left Through Right 16:00 - 16:15 0 0 0 0 0 016:15 - 16:30 0 0 0 0 0 016:30 - 16:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:45 - 17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:00 - 17:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:15 - 17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:30 - 17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:45 - 18:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 Left Through Right Left Through Right 16:00 - 16:15 0 2 0 0 7 0 16:15 - 16:30 0 3 0 0 2 0 16:30 - 16:45 0 5 0 0 8 0 16:45 - 17:00 0 0 0 0 5 0 17:00 - 17:15 0 2 0 0 1 0 17:15 - 17:30 0 3 0 0 0 0 17:30 - 17:45 0 2 0 0 0 0 17:45 - 18:00 0 3 0 0 1 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%0.0% Michael Blake Blvd 0.2% SR 434 0.0% 17:00 - 18:00 0.0% 0.8% 0.0%0.0% 0.0% 0.0% SR 434 Westbound GMB Project #: Time Period Northbound Southbound Eastbound Roadway Count Summary GMB Engineers & Planners, Inc. Intersection Time Period Date Michael Blake Blvd January 15, 2015 County Seminole Winter Springs Trucks City North / South East / West Peak Hour Time Period 70 & 16:00 to 18:00 15-007.01 Left Through Right Left Through Right 16:00-16:15 000 000 16:15-16:30 000 000 16:30-16:45 000 000 16:45-17:00 000 00017:00-17:15 000 00017:15-17:30 000 00017:30-17:45 000 000 17:45-18:00 000 000 Left Through Right Left Through Right 16:00-16:15 400 000 16:15-16:30 200 000 16:30-16:45 400 000 16:45-17:00 800 000 17:00-17:15 600 00017:15-17:30 300 00017:30-17:45 300 00017:45-18:00 600 000 000 0 Michael Blake Blvd 0 SR 434 0 17:00 - 18:00 18 0 0 000 Roadway Count Summary GMB Engineers & Planners, Inc. Intersection Time Period Date County Seminole Winter SpringsCity Northbound Westbound North / South East / West Peak Hour Time Period Time Period Michael Blake Blvd SR 434 January 15, 2015 Southbound Eastbound GMB Project #: U-Turn & RTOR 71 72 Name IP Direction WL ET ST EL WT NT Gate Channel 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Phase/OL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2 4 6 8 Type VEH VEH VEH VEH VEH VEH VEH VEH OLP OLP OLP OLP PED PED PED PED Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 3 4 7 8 Min Grn 6 15 6 6 6 15 6 6 6 6 6 6 Passage 3 4 3 4 3 4 3 4 6 10 10 6 Max 1 15 70 50 65 15 70 65 50 65 65 65 65 Max 2 15 70 50 65 15 70 65 50 65 65 65 65 Yel Clr 4.8 4.9 4.8 3.4 4.9 4.9 3.4 4.8 4.8 3.4 3.4 4.8 Red Clr 2.6 2 3.9 4.1 2.4 2 4.1 3.9 3.9 4.1 4.1 3.9 Walk 7 7 7 7 7 7 Ped Clr 33 40 21 41 40 41 Red Rvrt 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Added Init Max Initial Max3 Limit Max3 Step Time B-4 Cars B-4 Time to Reduce By Min Gap Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Assign 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Enable X X X X X X X X Max2 Min ®X X Max Inh Max ®Cnf Ph 7 8 3 4 Ped ® Soft ®Assign 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Lock Call X X X X X X Max2 Flash Ent X X Max Inh Flash Exit X X 7 8 3 4 Dual Entry X X X X X X Sim Gap X X Assign Cond Serv Max2 Reservice Max Inh Cnf Phase 7 8 3 4 Grn Yel Red Overlap - A 1 4.5 2 Overlap - B 2 4.5 2 Overlap - C 3 4.5 2 Overlap - D 4 4.5 2 Overlap - E 5 4.5 2 Overlap - F 6 4.5 2 Overlap - G 7 4.5 2 Overlap - H 8 4.5 2 Overlap - I 9 4.5 2 Overlap - J 10 4.5 2 Overlap - K 11 4.5 2 Overlap - L 12 4.5 2 Overlap - M 13 4.5 2 Overlap - N 14 4.5 2 Overlap - O 15 4.5 2 Overlap - P 16 4.5 2 X Enbl Trk Grn Min Dwl Pre Run 1 OFF Pre Run 2 OFF Pre Run 3 ON 3 8 1 5 Pre Run 4 ON 4 7 1 5 Pre Run 5 ON 2 5 2 6 Pre Run 6 ON 1 6 2 6 Seminole County Traffic Engineering Timing Sheet Intersection: SR 434 @ 35-Tuskawilla Rd #2392 SR434 Tuskawilla SR434 Tuskawilla 010.046.174.024 Mask 255.255.255.0 10.46.174.254 Port #5083 Com ID #1365Ph Mode STD8 Node #2392 Date 7-Feb-17 Done By EPrincipe Free Seq 9 Phase Times Alt Phase Times 1 Assign Min Grn Passage Max 1 Max 2 Yel Clr Red Clr Walk Ped Clr Alt Phase Times 2 Assign Min Grn Ped Clr Phase Options Alt Phase Opt 1 Passage Max 1 Max 2 Yel Clr Red Clr Walk Alt Phase Opt 2 Cnf Ph Alt Phase Opt 3 Cnf Ph Included Phase Modifier Phase NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL Track Phase Track Overlap Dwell Phase Dwell Overlap Exit Phase 1 2392 TS SR 434 @ Tuskawilla73 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Evt Hr Min Act Evnt Hr Min Act Split 1 27 67 58 28 18 76 28 58 Sun 1 99 Mon 1 99 Coord Ph X 2 10 8 2 6 30 1 Mode NON MAX NON NON NON MAX NON NON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT D 3 10 30 18 D 3 6 45 11 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A 4 11 8 A 4 7 10 21 Split 2 18 49 33 30 18 49 30 33 Y 5 12 30 18 Y 5 7 30 1 Coord Ph X 6 13 8 6 9 30 2 Mode NON MAX NON NON NON MAX NON NON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT P 7 19 30 99 P 7 13 30 3 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 L 8 L 8 14 15 13 Split 3 19 54 43 24 18 55 24 43 A 9 A 9 14 45 3 Coord Ph X N 10 N 10 16 4 Mode NON MAX NON NON NON MAX NON NON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 11 11 19 5 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1 12 2 12 20 30 99 Split 4 23 82 40 25 18 87 25 40 13 13 Coord Ph X 14 14 Mode NON MAX NON NON NON MAX NON NON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 15 15 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Evt Hr Min Act Evt Hr Min Act Split 5 18 48 28 26 18 48 26 28 Tue 1 99 Wed 1 99 Coord Ph X 2 6 30 1 2 6 30 1 Mode NON MAX NON NON NON MAX NON NON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT D 3 6 45 11 D 3 6 45 11 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A 4 7 10 21 A 4 7 10 21 Split 6 18 49 28 25 18 49 25 28 Y 5 7 30 1 Y 5 7 30 1 Coord Ph X 6 9 30 2 6 9 30 2 Mode NON MAX NON NON NON MAX NON NON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT P 7 13 30 3 P 7 13 15 13 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 L 8 14 15 13 L 8 13 45 3 Split 7 A 9 14 45 3 A 9 16 4 Coord Ph X N 10 16 4 N 10 19 5 Mode NON MAXNON NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 11 19 5 11 20 30 99 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 3 12 20 30 99 4 12 Split 8 18 49 28 25 18 49 25 28 13 13 Coord Ph X 14 14 Mode NON MAX NON NON NON MAX NON NON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 15 15 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Evt Hr Min Act Evt Hr Min Act Split 9 Thur 1 99 Fri 1 99 Coord Ph X 2 6 30 1 2 6 30 1 Mode NON MAXNON NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT D 3 6 45 11 D 3 6 45 11 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A 4 7 10 21 A 4 7 10 21 Split 10 Y 5 7 30 1 Y 5 7 30 1 Coord Ph X 6 9 30 2 6 9 30 2 Mode NON MAXNON NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT P 7 13 30 3 P 7 13 30 3 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 L 8 14 15 13 L 8 14 15 13 Split 11 23 45 78 34 20 48 34 78 A 9 14 45 3 A 9 14 45 3 Coord Ph X N 10 16 4 N 10 16 4 Mode NON MAX NON NON NON MAX NON NON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 11 19 5 11 19 5 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 5 12 20 30 99 6 12 20 30 99 Split 12 13 13 Coord Ph X 14 14 Mode NON MAXNON NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 15 15 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Evt Hr Min Act Evt Hr Min Act Split 13 20 42 30 48 18 44 48 30 Sat 1 99 Spc 1 99 Coord Ph X 2 8 6 Plan 2 6 30 1 Mode NON MAX NON NON NON MAX NON NON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT D 3 20 99 D 3 6 45 11 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A 4 A 4 7 10 21 Split 14 Y 5 Y 5 7 30 1 Coord Ph X 6 6 9 30 2 Mode NON MAXNON NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT P 7 P 7 11 15 13 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 L 8 L 8 12 2 Split 15 A 9 A 9 13 30 3 Coord Ph X N 10 N 10 16 4 Mode NON MAXNON NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 11 11 19 5 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 7 12 8 12 20 30 99 Split 16 13 13 Coord Ph X 14 14 Mode NON MAXNON NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 15 15 Coordination Splits 1-16 Day Plans 1-8 2 2392 TS SR 434 @ Tuskawilla74 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Evt Hr Min Act Evt Hr Min Act Split 17 Spc 1 Spc 1 Coord Ph X Plan 2 Plan 2 Mode NON MAXNON NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT D 3 D 3 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A 4 A 4 Split 18 18 34 28 40 18 34 40 28 Y 5 Y 5 Coord Ph X 6 6 Mode NON MAX NON NON NON MAX NON NON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT P 7 P 7 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 L 8 L 8 Split 19 A 9 A 9 Coord Ph X N 10 N 10 Mode NON MAXNON NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 11 11 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 9 12 10 12 Split 20 13 13 Coord Ph X 14 14 Mode NON MAXNON NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 15 15 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Evt Hr Min Act Evt Hr Min Act Split 21 20 49 55 56 20 49 55 56 Spc 1 Spc 1 Coord Ph X Plan 2 Plan 2 Mode NON MAX NON NON NON MAX NON NON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT D 3 D 3 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A 4 A 4 Split 22 Y 5 Y 5 Coord Ph X 6 6 Mode NON MAXNON NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT P 7 P 7 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 L 8 L 8 Split 23 A 9 A 9 Coord Ph X N 10 N 10 Mode NON MAXNON NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 11 11 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 11 12 12 12 Split 24 13 13 Coord Ph X OFF 14 14 Mode NON MAXNON NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 15 15 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Evt Hr Min Act Evt Hr Min Act Split 25 Spc 1 Spc 1 Coord Ph X Plan 2 Plan 2 Mode NON MAXNON NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT D 3 D 3 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A 4 A 4 Split 26 Y 5 Y 5 Coord Ph X 6 6 Mode NON MAXNON NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT P 7 P 7 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 L 8 L 8 Split 27 A 9 A 9 Coord Ph X N 10 N 10 Mode NON MAXNON NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 11 11 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 13 12 14 12 Split 28 13 13 Coord Ph X 14 14 Mode NON MAXNON NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 15 15 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Evt Hr Min Act Evt Hr Min Act Split 29 Spc 1 Spc 1 Coord Ph X Plan 2 Plan 2 Mode NON MAXNON NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT D 3 D 3 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A 4 A 4 Split 30 Y 5 Y 5 Coord Ph X 6 6 Mode NON MAXNON NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT P 7 P 7 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 L 8 L 8 Split 31 A 9 A 9 Coord Ph X N 10 N 10 Mode NON MAXNON NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 11 11 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 15 12 16 12 Split 32 13 13 Coord Ph X 14 14 Mode NON MAXNON NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 15 15 Coordination Splits 17-32 Day Plans 9-16 3 2392 TS SR 434 @ Tuskawilla75 on Act C O SP Seq TM OPT Det CIR Sh Lng No S No S Yld Mx2 Flt R Hld In1 In2 In3 In4 In5 In6 In7 In8 YINH Pattern - 1 1 180 176 1 5 1 12 22 X Pattern - 2 2 130 80 2 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 3 3 140 92 3 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 4 4 170 77 4 5 2 12 22 X X Pattern - 5 5 120 11 5 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 6 6 120 41 6 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 7 7 7 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 8 8 120 41 8 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 9 9 9 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 10 10 10 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 11 11 180 147 11 5 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 12 12 12 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 13 13 140 92 13 9 2 12 22 X X Pattern - 14 14 14 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 15 15 15 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 16 16 16 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 17 17 17 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 18 18 120 41 18 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 19 19 19 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 20 20 20 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 21 21 180 176 21 9 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 22 22 22 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 23 23 23 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 24 24 24 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 25 25 25 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 26 26 26 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 27 27 27 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 28 28 28 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 29 29 29 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 30 30 30 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 31 31 31 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 32 32 32 9 1 12 22 X Pattern - 33 33 32 9 1 1 Pattern - 34 34 9 Pattern - 35 35 9 Pattern - 36 36 9 Pattern - 37 37 9 Pattern - 38 38 9 Pattern - 39 39 9 Pattern - 40 40 9 Pattern - 41 41 9 Pattern - 42 42 9 Pattern - 43 43 9 Pattern - 44 44 9 Pattern - 45 45 9 Pattern - 46 46 9 Pattern - 47 47 9 Pattern - 48 48 9 Det Call Swt Dly Lck Src Det Call Swt Dly Lck Src Det Call Swt Dly Lck Src Det Call Swt Dly Lck Src Detector 1 1 6 17 33 49 Detector 2 2 18 34 50 Detector 3 2 19 35 51 Detector 4 4 20 36 52 Detector 5 4 21 37 53 Detector 6 5 2 22 38 54 Detector 7 6 23 39 55 Detector 8 6 24 40 56 Detector 9 6 25 41 57 Detector 10 6 26 42 58 Detector 11 8 27 43 59 Detector 12 8 28 44 60 Detector 13 8 29 45 61 Detector 14 30 46 62 Detector 15 31 47 63 Detector 16 32 48 64 4 2392 TS SR 434 @ Tuskawilla76 P6 P6 6 1 P6 P6 P8 P4 W E 5 6 4 1 2 2R 8 5 P2 P2 P8 P4 2 P2 P2 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 7 P6 P6 6 1 P6 P6 P4 P8 5 6 4 1 2 2R 8 5 P2 P2 P4 P8 2 P2 P2 1 2 4 3 5 6 7 8Ring 2 Ring 1 Ring 2 Tuskawilla Rd S.R. 434 Seq 9 Ring 1 N Tuskawilla Rd S.R. 434 S Cabinet Seq 5 Intersection Notes T.O.D Notes Intersection set as concurent sides. But operates as Q-Seq due to Intersection re-timed January 2017. set up of controller (phases enabled and conflicting phases).Patterns 11,13 & 21 are used for High School AM rush with Alt Time Plan 1. Phases 1 + 5 are 5-sect. and Det. Switched.Alt Time Plan 1 to allow higher extend times to phase 4 for PM school 2R hardwired to Phase 8.rush time. 5 2392 TS SR 434 @ Tuskawilla77 Name IP Direction WL ET ST EL WT SL NT Gate Channel 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Phase/OL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 2 4 6 8 Type VEH VEH VEH VEH VEH VEH VEH VEH OLP OLP OLP OLP PED PED PED PED Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Min Grn 6 15 8 6 15 6 8 Passage 3 5 3 3 5 3 3 Max 1 30 70 25 30 70 20 20 Max 2 30 70 20 30 70 20 20 Yel Clr 4.8 4.8 3.4 4.8 4.8 3.4 3.4 Red Clr 2.3 2 3.8 2.4 2 2.9 3.8 Walk 7 7 7 7 Ped Clr 19 32 19 31 Red Rvrt 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Added Init Max Initial Max3 Limit Max3 Step Time B-4 Cars B-4 Time to Reduce By Min Gap Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Assign 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 Enable X X X X X X X Max2 Min ®X X Max Inh Max ®Cnf Ph Ped ® Soft ®Assign 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 Lock Call X X X X Max2 Flash Ent X X Max Inh Flash Exit X X Dual Entry X X X X Sim Gap X X Assign Cond Serv Max2 Reservice Max Inh Cnf Phase Grn Yel Red Overlap - A 1 4.5 2 Overlap - B 2 4.5 2 Overlap - C 3 4.5 2 Overlap - D 4 4.5 2 Overlap - E 5 4.5 2 Overlap - F 6 4.5 2 Overlap - G 7 4.5 2 Overlap - H 8 4.5 2 Overlap - I 9 4.5 2 Overlap - J 10 4.5 2 Overlap - K 11 4.5 2 Overlap - L 12 4.5 2 Overlap - M 13 4.5 2 Overlap - N 14 4.5 2 Overlap - O 15 4.5 2 Overlap - P 16 4.5 2 X Enbl Trk Grn Min Dwl Pre Run 1 OFF Pre Run 2 OFF Pre Run 3 ON 8 4 8 Pre Run 4 ON 4 7 4 8 Pre Run 5 ON 2 5 2 6 Pre Run 6 ON 1 6 2 6 Seminole County Traffic Engineering Timing Sheet Intersection: SR 434 @ 34-Doran Dr #12076 SR 434 Bear Spgs SR 434 Bear Spgs 010.046.174.022 Mask 255.255.255.0 10.46.174.254 Port #5082 Com ID #1360Ph Mode STD8 Node #12076 Date 7-Feb-17 Done By EPrincipe Free Seq 1 Phase Times Alt Phase Times 1 Assign Min Grn Passage Max 1 Max 2 Yel Clr Red Clr Walk Ped Clr Alt Phase Times 2 Assign Min Grn Ped Clr Phase Options Alt Phase Opt 1 Passage Max 1 Max 2 Yel Clr Red Clr Walk Alt Phase Opt 2 Cnf Ph Alt Phase Opt 3 Cnf Ph Included Phase Modifier Phase NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL NORMAL Track Phase Track Overlap Dwell Phase Dwell Overlap Exit Phase 1 12076 TS SR 434 @ Doran78 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Evt Hr Min Act Evnt Hr Min Act Split 1 18 117 45 18 117 18 27 Sun 1 99 Mon 1 99 Coord Ph X 2 10 8 2 6 30 1 Mode NON MAX OMT NON NON MAX NON NON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT D 3 19 30 99 D 3 9 30 2 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A 4 A 4 13 30 3 Split 2 18 75 37 20 73 18 19 Y 5 Y 5 14 20 13 Coord Ph X 6 6 14 45 3 Mode NON MAX OMT NON NON MAX NON NON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT P 7 P 7 15 15 13 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 L 8 L 8 15 45 3 Split 3 18 85 37 19 84 18 19 A 9 A 9 16 4 Coord Ph X N 10 N 10 19 5 Mode NON MAX OMT NON NON MAX NON NON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 11 11 20 30 99 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1 12 2 12 Split 4 18 115 37 24 109 18 19 13 13 Coord Ph X 14 14 Mode NON MAX OMT NON NON MAX NON NON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 15 15 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Evt Hr Min Act Evt Hr Min Act Split 5 20 63 37 20 63 18 19 Tue 1 99 Wed 1 99 Coord Ph X 2 6 30 1 2 6 30 1 Mode NON MAX OMT NON NON MAX NON NON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT D 3 9 30 2 D 3 9 30 2 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A 4 13 30 3 A 4 13 15 3 Split 6 18 65 37 19 64 18 19 Y 5 14 20 13 Y 5 14 20 13 Coord Ph X 6 14 45 3 6 14 45 3 Mode NON MAX OMT NON NON MAX NON NON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT P 7 15 15 13 P 7 15 15 13 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 L 8 15 45 3 L 8 15 45 3 Split 7 A 9 16 4 A 9 16 4 Coord Ph X N 10 19 5 N 10 19 5 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 11 20 30 99 11 20 30 99 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 3 12 4 12 Split 8 18 65 37 19 64 18 19 13 13 Coord Ph X 14 14 Mode NON MAX OMT NON NON MAX NON NON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 15 15 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Evt Hr Min Act Evt Hr Min Act Split 9 Thur 1 99 Fri 1 99 Coord Ph X 2 6 30 1 2 6 30 1 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT D 3 9 30 2 D 3 9 30 2 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A 4 13 30 3 A 4 13 30 3 Split 10 Y 5 14 20 13 Y 5 14 20 13 Coord Ph X 6 14 45 3 6 14 45 3 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT P 7 15 15 13 P 7 15 15 13 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 L 8 15 45 3 L 8 15 45 3 Split 11 A 9 16 4 A 9 16 4 Coord Ph X N 10 19 5 N 10 19 5 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 11 20 30 99 11 20 30 99 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 5 12 6 12 Split 12 13 13 Coord Ph X 14 14 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 15 15 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Evt Hr Min Act Evt Hr Min Act Split 13 18 85 37 19 84 18 19 Sat 1 99 Spc 1 Coord Ph X 2 8 6 Plan 2 Mode NON MAX OMT NON NON MAX NON NON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT D 3 20 99 D 3 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A 4 A 4 Split 14 Y 5 Y 5 Coord Ph X 6 6 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT P 7 P 7 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 L 8 L 8 Split 15 A 9 A 9 Coord Ph X N 10 N 10 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 11 11 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 7 12 8 12 Split 16 13 13 Coord Ph X 14 14 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 15 15 Coordination Splits 1-16 Day Plans 1-8 2 12076 TS SR 434 @ Doran79 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Evt Hr Min Act Evt Hr Min Act Split 17 Spc 1 Spc 1 Coord Ph X Plan 2 Plan 2 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT D 3 D 3 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A 4 A 4 Split 18 Y 5 Y 5 Coord Ph X 6 6 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT P 7 P 7 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 L 8 L 8 Split 19 A 9 A 9 Coord Ph X N 10 N 10 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 11 11 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 9 12 10 12 Split 20 13 13 Coord Ph X 14 14 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 15 15 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Evt Hr Min Act Evt Hr Min Act Split 21 Spc 1 Spc 1 Coord Ph X Plan 2 Plan 2 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT D 3 D 3 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A 4 A 4 Split 22 Y 5 Y 5 Coord Ph X 6 6 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT P 7 P 7 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 L 8 L 8 Split 23 A 9 A 9 Coord Ph X N 10 N 10 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 11 11 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 11 12 12 12 Split 24 13 13 Coord Ph X OFF 14 14 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 15 15 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Evt Hr Min Act Evt Hr Min Act Split 25 Spc 1 Spc 1 Coord Ph X Plan 2 Plan 2 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT D 3 D 3 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A 4 A 4 Split 26 Y 5 Y 5 Coord Ph X 6 6 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT P 7 P 7 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 L 8 L 8 Split 27 A 9 A 9 Coord Ph X N 10 N 10 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 11 11 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 13 12 14 12 Split 28 13 13 Coord Ph X 14 14 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 15 15 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Evt Hr Min Act Evt Hr Min Act Split 29 Spc 1 Spc 1 Coord Ph X Plan 2 Plan 2 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT D 3 D 3 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A 4 A 4 Split 30 Y 5 Y 5 Coord Ph X 6 6 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT P 7 P 7 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 L 8 L 8 Split 31 A 9 A 9 Coord Ph X N 10 N 10 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 11 11 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 15 12 16 12 Split 32 13 13 Coord Ph X 14 14 Mode NON MAXOMT NONNONMAX NONNON OMT OMTOMT OMTOMT OMT OMTOMT 15 15 Coordination Splits 17-32 Day Plans 9-16 3 12076 TS SR 434 @ Doran80 on Act C O SP Seq TM OPT Det CIR Sh Lng No S No S Yld Mx2 Flt R Hld In1 In2 In3 In4 In5 In6 In7 In8 YINH Pattern - 1 1 180 57 1 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 2 2 130 92 2 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 3 3 140 109 3 1 2 12 22 X X Pattern - 4 4 170 114 4 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 5 5 120 12 5 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 6 6 120 52 6 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 7 7 7 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 8 8 120 52 8 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 9 9 9 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 10 10 10 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 11 11 11 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 12 12 12 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 13 13 140 102 13 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 14 14 14 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 15 15 15 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 16 16 16 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 17 17 17 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 18 18 18 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 19 19 19 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 20 20 20 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 21 21 21 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 22 22 22 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 23 23 23 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 24 24 24 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 25 25 25 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 26 26 26 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 27 27 27 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 28 28 28 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 29 29 29 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 30 30 30 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 31 31 31 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 32 32 32 1 1 12 22 X Pattern - 33 33 1 Pattern - 34 34 1 Pattern - 35 35 1 Pattern - 36 36 1 Pattern - 37 37 1 Pattern - 38 38 1 Pattern - 39 39 1 Pattern - 40 40 1 Pattern - 41 41 1 Pattern - 42 42 1 Pattern - 43 43 1 Pattern - 44 44 1 Pattern - 45 45 1 Pattern - 46 46 1 Pattern - 47 47 1 Pattern - 48 48 1 Det Call Swt Dly Lck Src Det Call Swt Dly Lck Src Det Call Swt Dly Lck Src Det Call Swt Dly Lck Src Detector 1 1 6 17 33 4 13 49 Detector 2 2 18 34 50 Detector 3 2 19 35 51 Detector 4 2 20 36 52 Detector 5 2 21 37 53 Detector 6 8 22 38 54 Detector 7 4 8 23 39 55 Detector 8 5 2 24 40 56 Detector 9 6 25 41 57 Detector 10 6 26 42 58 Detector 11 6 27 43 59 Detector 12 6 28 44 60 Detector 13 7 29 45 61 Detector 14 8 8 30 46 62 Detector 15 31 47 63 Detector 16 32 48 64 4 12076 TS SR 434 @ Doran81 P6 P6 P4 6 4 7 1 P6 P6 5 6 P4 W E P4 P8 1 2 4 5 P2 P2 8 2 P4 P8 P2 P2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Ring 1 Ring 2 Bear Springs Dr. Mc Leod's Way N SR 434 S Cabinet Seq 1 Intersection Notes T.O.D Notes Intersection set up with concurent sides.Intersection re-timed January 2017. Phases 1 & 5 are 5_sec and use Det switching. Phase 7 extended with sourcing if no call on 8. 5 12076 TS SR 434 @ Doran82 APPENDIX C Synchro Capacity Analysis Worksheets Existing Conditions 83 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing Traffic Volumes 14: SR 434 & Doran Dr A.M. Peak Hour TPD, Inc.Synchro 9 Report 04/10/2017 Page 3 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 7 1194 3 5 1415 16 16 0 14 9 0 8 Future Volume (vph) 7 1194 3 5 1415 16 16 0 14 9 0 8 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 330 0 365 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 50 50 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 3505 0 1805 3499 0 0 1805 1615 0 1626 1429 Flt Permitted 0.155 0.207 0.752 0.746 Satd. Flow (perm) 294 3505 0 393 3499 0 0 1429 1615 0 1277 1429 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 1 105 67 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 1139 1456 348 488 Travel Time (s) 17.3 22.1 9.5 13.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 3% 0% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 11% 0% 13% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 7 1260 0 5 1506 0 0 17 15 0 9 8 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 8 4 4 Total Split (s) 18.0 117.0 18.0 117.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 18.0 45.0 45.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.2 6.8 7.1 6.8 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 Act Effct Green (s) 161.6 163.5 161.7 163.5 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.90 0.91 0.90 0.91 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.02 0.40 0.01 0.47 0.25 0.08 0.15 0.06 Control Delay 1.9 2.9 1.2 6.7 91.1 0.9 87.1 0.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 1.9 2.9 1.2 6.7 91.1 0.9 87.1 0.9 LOS AA AA FA FA Approach Delay 2.8 6.7 48.8 46.5 Approach LOS A A D D Queue Length 50th (ft) 1 115 1 578 20 0 10 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 3 259 m1 690 49 0 33 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1059 1376 268 408 Turn Bay Length (ft) 330 365 Base Capacity (vph) 356 3184 440 3178 157 271 268 353 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.02 0.40 0.01 0.47 0.11 0.06 0.03 0.02 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 57 (32%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL, Start of Green Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.47 Intersection Signal Delay: 5.7 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 14: SR 434 & Doran Dr 84 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing Traffic Volumes 8: Tuskawilla Rd & SR 434 A.M. Peak Hour TPD, Inc.Synchro 9 Report 04/10/2017 Page 2 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 44 882 438 149 952 34 520 72 132 62 75 2 Future Volume (vph) 44 882 438 149 952 34 520 72 132 62 75 2 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 315 450 370 0 525 0 150 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 50 50 100 50 Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 3505 1599 1787 3520 0 3400 1716 0 1752 1874 0 Flt Permitted 0.151 0.123 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 273 3505 1599 231 3520 0 3400 1716 0 1752 1874 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 456 2 50 1 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 30 Link Distance (ft) 1456 435 3056 544 Travel Time (s) 22.1 6.6 46.3 12.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 3% 1% 1% 2% 3% 3% 0% 0% 3% 1% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 46 919 456 155 1027 0 542 213 0 65 80 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA custom pm+pt NA Split NA Split NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 4 4 Permitted Phases 2 8 6 Total Split (s) 20.0 49.0 56.0 20.0 49.0 56.0 56.0 55.0 55.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.3 6.9 8.7 7.4 6.9 8.7 8.7 7.5 7.5 Act Effct Green (s) 71.9 63.9 53.1 86.1 74.9 53.1 53.1 15.9 15.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.40 0.36 0.30 0.48 0.42 0.30 0.30 0.09 0.09 v/c Ratio 0.26 0.74 0.58 0.61 0.70 0.54 0.39 0.42 0.48 Control Delay 42.9 63.0 6.6 41.9 48.2 54.1 38.1 85.1 86.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 42.9 63.0 6.6 41.9 48.2 54.1 38.1 85.1 86.1 LOS D E A D D D D F F Approach Delay 44.3 47.4 49.5 85.7 Approach LOS D D D F Queue Length 50th (ft) 31 537 62 100 526 283 156 74 91 Queue Length 95th (ft) 86 #812 186 #254 #922 282 196 127 149 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1376 355 2976 464 Turn Bay Length (ft) 315 450 370 525 150 Base Capacity (vph) 217 1244 810 253 1466 1054 566 462 495 Starvation Cap Reductn 00000 00 00 Spillback Cap Reductn 00000 00 00 Storage Cap Reductn 00000 00 00 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.21 0.74 0.56 0.61 0.70 0.51 0.38 0.14 0.16 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 176 (98%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL, Start of Green Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.74 Intersection Signal Delay: 48.2 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.9% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 8: Tuskawilla Rd & SR 434 85 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing Traffic Volumes 6: SR 434 & Michael Blake Blvd A.M. Peak Hour TPD, Inc.Synchro 9 Report 04/10/2017 Page 1 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 23 1067 1123 6 47 25 Future Volume (Veh/h) 23 1067 1123 6 47 25 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly flow rate (vph) 25 1147 1208 6 51 27 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Raised Raised Median storage veh) 1 1 Upstream signal (ft) 876 pX, platoon unblocked 0.77 vC, conflicting volume 1214 1834 607 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 1211 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 624 vCu, unblocked vol 1214 1490 607 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 96 74 94 cM capacity (veh/h) 582 198 444 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1 Volume Total 25 574 574 805 409 78 Volume Left 25 000051 Volume Right 0000627 cSH 582 1700 1700 1700 1700 245 Volume to Capacity 0.04 0.34 0.34 0.47 0.24 0.32 Queue Length 95th (ft)3000033 Control Delay (s) 11.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.4 Lane LOS B D Approach Delay (s) 0.2 0.0 26.4 Approach LOS D Intersection Summary Average Delay 1.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization Err% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 86 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing Traffic Volumes 14: SR 434 & Doran Dr P.M. Peak Hour TPD, Inc.Synchro 9 Report 04/10/2017 Page 3 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 11 1390 15 12 1290 77098234 Future Volume (vph) 11 1390 15 12 1290 77098234 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 330 0 365 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 50 50 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 3499 0 1805 3502 0 0 1805 1615 0 1680 1429 Flt Permitted 0.180 0.157 0.751 0.764 Satd. Flow (perm) 342 3499 0 298 3502 0 0 1427 1615 0 1334 1429 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 1 1 110 70 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 1139 1456 348 488 Travel Time (s) 17.3 22.1 9.5 13.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 3% 0% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 11% 0% 13% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 12 1479 0 13 1365 007901036 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 8 4 4 Total Split (s) 24.0 115.0 18.0 109.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 18.0 37.0 37.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.2 6.8 7.1 6.8 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 Act Effct Green (s) 147.7 147.1 147.8 147.0 8.1 8.1 8.1 8.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.86 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.03 0.49 0.04 0.45 0.10 0.05 0.16 0.27 Control Delay 1.8 4.6 2.8 4.8 80.9 0.6 83.6 5.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 1.8 4.6 2.8 4.8 80.9 0.6 83.6 5.3 LOS AA AA FA FA Approach Delay 4.6 4.8 35.7 22.3 Approach LOS A A D C Queue Length 50th (ft) 1 150 2 107 8 0 11 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 4 316 m4 255 26 0 34 3 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1059 1376 268 408 Turn Bay Length (ft) 330 365 Base Capacity (vph) 447 3027 359 3028 99 214 233 308 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.03 0.49 0.04 0.45 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.12 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 170 Actuated Cycle Length: 170 Offset: 114 (67%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL, Start of Green Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.49 Intersection Signal Delay: 5.1 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.9% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 14: SR 434 & Doran Dr 87 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing Traffic Volumes 8: Tuskawilla Rd & SR 434 P.M. Peak Hour TPD, Inc.Synchro 9 Report 04/10/2017 Page 2 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 41 949 469 145 882 83 481 109 112 113 135 0 Future Volume (vph) 41 949 469 145 882 83 481 109 112 113 135 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 315 450 370 0 525 0 150 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 50 50 100 50 Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 3505 1599 1787 3490 0 3400 1756 0 1752 1881 0 Flt Permitted 0.206 0.169 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 373 3505 1599 318 3490 0 3400 1756 0 1752 1881 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 463 8 27 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 30 Link Distance (ft) 1456 435 3056 544 Travel Time (s) 22.1 6.6 46.3 12.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 3% 1% 1% 2% 3% 3% 0% 0% 3% 1% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 43 989 489 151 1005 0 501 231 0 118 141 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA custom pm+pt NA Split NA Split NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 4 4 Permitted Phases 2 8 6 Total Split (s) 18.0 82.0 40.0 23.0 87.0 40.0 40.0 25.0 25.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.3 6.9 8.7 7.4 6.9 8.7 8.7 8.9 8.9 Act Effct Green (s) 86.9 79.9 30.7 97.3 87.4 30.7 30.7 15.4 15.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.51 0.47 0.18 0.57 0.51 0.18 0.18 0.09 0.09 v/c Ratio 0.17 0.60 0.73 0.53 0.56 0.82 0.68 0.75 0.83 Control Delay 17.9 33.0 19.9 23.6 30.5 78.6 68.3 102.4 110.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 17.9 33.0 19.9 23.6 30.5 78.6 68.3 102.4 110.4 LOS BCBCC EE FF Approach Delay 28.4 29.6 75.3 106.8 Approach LOS C C E F Queue Length 50th (ft) 20 336 98 76 412 279 215 130 157 Queue Length 95th (ft) 41 376 288 116 493 348 317 #224 #274 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1376 355 2976 464 Turn Bay Length (ft) 315 450 370 525 150 Base Capacity (vph) 282 1648 672 319 1798 626 345 165 178 Starvation Cap Reductn 00000 00 00 Spillback Cap Reductn 00000 00 00 Storage Cap Reductn 00000 00 00 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.15 0.60 0.73 0.47 0.56 0.80 0.67 0.72 0.79 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 170 Actuated Cycle Length: 170 Offset: 77 (45%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL, Start of Green Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.83 Intersection Signal Delay: 43.7 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.7% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 8: Tuskawilla Rd & SR 434 88 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing Traffic Volumes 6: SR 434 & Michael Blake Blvd P.M. Peak Hour TPD, Inc.Synchro 9 Report 04/10/2017 Page 1 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 52 1210 1128 28 14 4 Future Volume (Veh/h) 52 1210 1128 28 14 4 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly flow rate (vph) 56 1301 1213 30 15 4 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Raised Raised Median storage veh) 1 1 Upstream signal (ft) 876 pX, platoon unblocked 0.79 vC, conflicting volume 1243 1990 622 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 1228 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 762 vCu, unblocked vol 1243 1727 622 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 90 92 99 cM capacity (veh/h) 567 179 435 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1 Volume Total 56 650 650 809 434 19 Volume Left 56 000015 Volume Right 0000304 cSH 567 1700 1700 1700 1700 205 Volume to Capacity 0.10 0.38 0.38 0.48 0.26 0.09 Queue Length 95th (ft)800008 Control Delay (s) 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.4 Lane LOS B C Approach Delay (s) 0.5 0.0 24.4 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization Err% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 89 APPENDIX D Model Distribution Plot 90 91 APPENDIX E Integra Winter Springs, Tuskawilla Crossings and Catalyst Apartments Traffic Volumes 92 49 1117+(60)=1177 552 97+(3)=100 1038+(73)=1111 171+(36)=207 566126131+(29)=1600158134+(3)=137SR 434 @Tuskawilla Rd 16 1422+(92)=1514 33+(1)=34 1327+(113)=1440517+(1)=18SR 434 @Michael Blake Blvd 3 1329+(93)=1422 64 1316+(113)=1429 72+(11)=83 3732+(9)=41SR 434 @Tuscora Dr SR 434 @Creek's Run Way/Project Access 1 1237+(142)=1379 121+(11)=132 1274+(115)=1389 199 127+(9)=13653SR 434 @Vistawilla Dr 139+(18)=157 1350+(70)=1420 147 870+(57)=927 507+(44)=515213SR 434 @SR 417 NB Ramps 1062+(88)=1150 333+(54)=387 1163+(87)=1250 26588+(13)=101130SR 434 @SR 417 SB Ramps (102) 1069 12 (62) 1082+(25)=1107 21 509(100)(0)(153)1079+(153)=1232 (62) 1102+(62)=1164 SR 434 @Project Access (RIRO)(25)Figure IV-2Project TrafficAssignment, PM Peak Project Site Intersections Analysis 0 1,500 3,000750Feet Background + (Project Trips) = Total Volume 93 52 1038+(52)=1090 516 40+(2)=42 1120+(43)=1163 175+(22)=197 61285155+(25)=18028872+(2)=74SR 434 @Tuskawilla Rd 27 1256+(80)=1136 7+(1)=8 1321+(68)=13892955+(1)=56SR 434 @Michael Blake Blvd 14 1243+(81)=1324 37 1317+(68)=1385 36+(7)=43 57110+(8)=118SR 434 @Tuscora Dr SR 434 @Creek's Run Way/Project Access 6 1293+(85)=1378 118+(7)=125 1146+(100)=1246 172 136+(8)=144152SR 434 @Vistawilla Dr 260+(11)=271 832+(42)=874 362 1181+(49)=1230 286+(38)=32449SR 434 @SR 417 NB Ramps 961+(53)=1014 562+(32)=594 1163+(87)=1250 26588+(13)=101130SR 434 @SR 417 SB Ramps (88) 1281 1 (54) 1297+(15)=1312 3 14023(60)(0)(92)1302+(92)=1394 (54) 1300+(54)=1354 SR 434 @Project Access (RIRO)(15)Figure IV-1Project TrafficAssignment, AM Peak Project Site Intersections Analysis 0 1,500 3,000750Feet Background + (Project Trips) = Total Volume 94 95 96 Projected A.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Winter Springs Apartments 4531.1Project № Figure 6 NTS NCentral Winds DrSR 434 Heritage Park St142433130 1,180+(55)=1,235 25 222 926+(13)=939 45 343540Doran DrSR 43480917 1,472+(55)=1,527 5 7 1,242+(13)=1,255 3 17015Tuskawilla RdSR 4342+(9)=1178+(9)=876535 990+(46)=1,036 155+(17)=172 46+(2)=48 917+(11)=928 456 54175+(2)=77137+(4)=141Michael BlakeBlvdSR 434 SR 434 Tuscora Dr1,165+(6)=1,171 32 13 1,099+(24)=1,123 33 5097Perimeter Rd(3) 1,194+(51)=1,245 Tuskawilla RdTree Swallow Rd 14210(2)(9) 0 (18)49159(4)Legend: 000 + (000) = 000 Total Traffic Project Traffic Background Traffic26+(51)=7749+(24)=736+(3)=9 1,168+(3)=1,171 24+(15)=39 1,110(12)10 0 55 1,134+(15)=1,149 97 Projected P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Winter Springs Apartments 4531.1Project № Figure 7 NTS NCentral Winds DrSR 434 Heritage Park St1001157128 1,489+(29)=1,518 51 146 1,542+(54)=1,596 44 412750Doran DrSR 43435287 1,342+(29)=1,371 13 11 1,446+(54)=1,500 16 709Tuskawilla RdSR 4340140+(5)=145118+(5)=12386 917+(24)=941 151+(9)=160 43+(9)=52 987+(45)=1,032 488 500113+(9)=122117+(17)=134Michael BlakeBlvdSR 434 4+(27)=3115+(13)=2829+(12)=41 1,173+(12)=1,185 54+(62)=116 1,258 SR 434 Tuscora Dr1,163+(24)=1,187 65 3 1,175+(13)=1,188 57 3328Perimeter RdTuskawilla RdLegend: 000 + (000) = 000 Total Traffic Project Traffic Background Traffic (12) 1,177+(27)=1,204 41198(9)(5) 0 (10) 13 0 166 110181(18)(6)1,312+(62)=1,374 Tree Swallow Rd 98 APPENDIX F Synchro Capacity Analysis Worksheets Projected Conditions 99 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: SR 434 & Doran Dr 03/27/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 7 1391 3 5 1683 17 17 0 15 9 0 8 Future Volume (vph) 7 1391 3 5 1683 17 17 0 15 9 0 8 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 330 0 365 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 50 50 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.998 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 3505 0 1805 3499 0 0 1805 1615 0 1626 1429 Flt Permitted 0.107 0.161 0.752 0.746 Satd. Flow (perm) 203 3505 0 306 3499 0 0 1429 1615 0 1277 1429 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR)1 105 67 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 1139 1456 348 488 Travel Time (s) 17.3 22.1 9.5 13.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 3% 0% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 11% 0% 13% Adj. Flow (vph) 7 1464 3 5 1772 18 18 0 16 9 0 8 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 7 1467 0 5 1790 0 0 18 16 0 9 8 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 45 45 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 7 4 100 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: SR 434 & Doran Dr 03/27/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Permitted Phases 2 6 8 8 4 4 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 8 8 8 7 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 15.0 6.0 15.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 15.0 33.8 13.6 37.8 16.1 16.1 16.1 14.0 32.0 32.0 Total Split (s) 18.0 117.0 18.0 117.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 18.0 45.0 45.0 Total Split (%) 10.0% 65.0% 10.0% 65.0% 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% 10.0% 25.0% 25.0% Maximum Green (s) 10.8 110.2 10.9 110.2 19.8 19.8 19.8 11.7 37.8 37.8 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 All-Red Time (s) 2.4 2.0 2.3 2.0 3.8 3.8 3.8 2.9 3.8 3.8 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.2 6.8 7.1 6.8 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max None Max None None None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 19.0 19.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 32.0 32.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 158.5 159.1 158.6 159.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.03 0.47 0.02 0.58 0.26 0.09 0.15 0.06 Control Delay 2.0 3.7 1.8 4.7 91.6 1.0 86.9 0.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 2.0 3.7 1.8 4.7 91.6 1.0 86.9 0.9 LOS A A A A F A F A Approach Delay 3.7 4.7 49.0 46.4 Approach LOS A A D D 90th %ile Green (s) 6.0 142.2 6.0 142.1 10.7 10.7 10.7 0.0 10.7 10.7 90th %ile Term Code Min Coord Min Coord Gap Gap Gap Skip Hold Hold 70th %ile Green (s) 0.0 157.1 0.0 157.1 8.9 8.9 8.9 0.0 8.9 8.9 70th %ile Term Code Skip Coord Skip Coord Gap Gap Gap Skip Hold Hold 50th %ile Green (s) 0.0 158.0 0.0 158.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 0.0 8.0 8.0 50th %ile Term Code Skip Coord Skip Coord Min Min Min Skip Min Min 30th %ile Green (s) 0.0 158.0 0.0 158.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 0.0 8.0 8.0 30th %ile Term Code Skip Coord Skip Coord Min Min Min Skip Hold Hold 10th %ile Green (s) 0.0 173.2 0.0 173.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10th %ile Term Code Skip Coord Skip Coord Skip Skip Skip Skip Skip Skip Queue Length 50th (ft) 1 147 1 214 21 0 10 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 3 332 3 480 51 0 33 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1059 1376 268 408 Turn Bay Length (ft) 330 365 Base Capacity (vph) 275 3097 361 3091 157 271 268 353 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.03 0.47 0.01 0.58 0.11 0.06 0.03 0.02 Intersection Summary 101 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: SR 434 & Doran Dr 03/27/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 57 (32%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 105 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.58 Intersection Signal Delay: 4.9 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.1% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 14: SR 434 & Doran Dr 102 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 8: Tuskawilla Rd & SR 434 03/28/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 48 1056 464 221 1171 37 563 94 205 67 104 11 Future Volume (vph) 48 1056 464 221 1171 37 563 94 205 67 104 11 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 315 450 370 0 525 0 150 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 50 50 100 50 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.995 0.897 0.986 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 3505 1599 1787 3520 0 3400 1704 0 1752 1857 0 Flt Permitted 0.103 0.057 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 186 3505 1599 107 3520 0 3400 1704 0 1752 1857 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 464 2 61 2 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 30 Link Distance (ft) 1456 435 3056 544 Travel Time (s) 22.1 6.6 46.3 12.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 3% 1% 1% 2% 3% 3% 0% 0% 3% 1% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) 50 1100 483 230 1220 39 586 98 214 70 108 11 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 50 1100 483 230 1259 0 586 312 0 70 119 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 45 32 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Split NA Split NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 4 4 103 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 8: Tuskawilla Rd & SR 434 03/28/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Permitted Phases 2 2 6 Detector Phase 5 2 2 1 6 8 8 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 15.0 15.0 6.0 15.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 13.3 45.0 45.0 13.8 34.9 60.0 60.0 30.0 30.0 Total Split (s) 13.4 64.0 64.0 26.0 76.6 60.0 60.0 30.0 30.0 Total Split (%) 7.4% 35.6% 35.6% 14.4% 42.6% 33.3% 33.3% 16.7% 16.7% Maximum Green (s) 6.1 57.1 57.1 18.6 69.7 51.3 51.3 22.5 22.5 Yellow Time (s) 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.8 4.9 4.8 4.8 3.4 3.4 All-Red Time (s) 2.4 2.0 2.0 2.6 2.0 3.9 3.9 4.1 4.1 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.3 6.9 6.9 7.4 6.9 8.7 8.7 7.5 7.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None Max None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 33.0 33.0 21.0 41.0 41.0 40.0 40.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 68.8 62.3 62.3 92.9 81.8 44.6 44.6 18.9 18.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.35 0.35 0.52 0.45 0.25 0.25 0.10 0.10 v/c Ratio 0.38 0.91 0.56 0.83 0.79 0.70 0.67 0.38 0.61 Control Delay 41.4 70.1 12.1 75.0 48.1 65.7 55.2 80.3 88.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 41.4 70.1 12.1 75.0 48.1 65.7 55.2 80.3 88.5 LOS D E B E D E E F F Approach Delay 52.1 52.3 62.0 85.5 Approach LOS D D E F Queue Length 50th (ft) 29 627 16 214 695 326 272 78 134 Queue Length 95th (ft) 81 #826 269 #436 #856 378 372 134 206 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1376 355 2976 464 Turn Bay Length (ft) 315 450 370 525 150 Base Capacity (vph) 130 1212 856 276 1600 969 529 219 233 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.38 0.91 0.56 0.83 0.79 0.60 0.59 0.32 0.51 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 176 (98%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.91 Intersection Signal Delay: 55.8 Intersection LOS: E Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.4% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 104 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 8: Tuskawilla Rd & SR 434 03/28/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 8: Tuskawilla Rd & SR 434 105 HCM 6th TWSC Projected Traffic Volumes 6: SR 434 & Michael Blake Blvd A.M. Peak Hour TPD, Inc.Synchro 9 Report 03/27/2019 Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1271.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 186 1154 4 12 1276 68 11 4 32 171 2 138 Future Vol, veh/h 186 1154 4 12 1276 68 11 4 32 171 2 138 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 330 - - 0 - - - - 0 - - 100 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 93 93 92 92 93 93 92 92 92 93 92 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 3 2 2 2 17 2 2 2 0 2 0 Mvmt Flow 200 1241 4 13 1372 73 12 4 35 184 2 148 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1445 0 0 1245 0 0 2356 3114 623 2458 3080 723 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1643 1643 - 1435 1435 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 713 1471 - 1023 1645 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.5 6.54 6.9 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.5 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.5 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.5 4.02 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 475 - - 555 - - 19 11 429 ~ 16 12 373 Stage 1 - - - - - - 104 156 - ~ 143 197 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 389 190 - 256 156 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 475 - - 555 - - ~ 6 6 429 ~ 4 7 373 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - ~ 6 6 - ~ 4 7 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 60 90 - ~ 83 192 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 226 186 - ~ 130 90 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 2.5 0.1 $ 625.9 $ 12396.4 HCM LOS F F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 6 429 475 - - 555 - - 4 373 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 2.717 0.081 0.421 - - 0.024 - - 46.511 0.398 HCM Control Delay (s) $ 1931.1 14.1 18 - - 11.6 - -$ 22266.9 20.9 HCM Lane LOS F B C - - B - - F C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 3.2 0.3 2.1 - - 0.1 - - 25.5 1.9 Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 106 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: SR 434 & Michael Blake Blvd 03/27/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 186 1154 4 12 1276 68 11 4 32 171 2 138 Future Volume (vph) 186 1154 4 12 1276 68 11 4 32 171 2 138 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 330 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 50 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.992 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.964 0.953 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 3505 0 1770 3485 0 0 1796 1583 0 1810 1615 Flt Permitted 0.044 0.163 0.810 0.717 Satd. Flow (perm) 84 3505 0 304 3485 0 0 1509 1583 0 1362 1615 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR)4 91 92 Link Speed (mph) 50 50 30 25 Link Distance (ft) 441 1255 478 597 Travel Time (s) 6.0 17.1 10.9 16.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.92 0.93 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 3% 2% 2% 2% 17% 2% 2% 2% 0% 2% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) 200 1241 4 13 1372 73 12 4 35 184 2 148 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 200 1245 0 13 1445 0 0 16 35 0 186 148 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 32 32 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 107 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: SR 434 & Michael Blake Blvd 03/27/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Permitted Phases 2 6 8 8 4 4 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 3 8 8 7 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 15.0 6.0 15.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 22.0 12.0 22.0 12.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 Total Split (s) 29.0 86.0 29.0 86.0 35.0 30.0 30.0 35.0 30.0 30.0 Total Split (%) 16.1% 47.8% 16.1% 47.8% 19.4% 16.7% 16.7% 19.4% 16.7% 16.7% Maximum Green (s) 23.0 80.0 23.0 80.0 29.0 24.0 24.0 29.0 24.0 24.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max None Max None None None None Max Max Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 109.0 104.0 90.1 83.9 59.0 59.0 59.0 59.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.61 0.58 0.50 0.47 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 v/c Ratio 0.86 0.62 0.06 0.89 0.03 0.06 0.42 0.25 Control Delay 83.4 27.3 16.2 52.1 41.5 0.2 50.7 18.2 Queue Delay 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 83.4 28.5 16.2 52.1 41.5 0.2 50.7 18.2 LOS F C B D D A D B Approach Delay 36.1 51.7 13.2 36.3 Approach LOS D D B D Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 100 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.89 Intersection Signal Delay: 42.7 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.0% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6: SR 434 & Michael Blake Blvd 108 HCM 6th TWSC 17: SR 434 & Site Access 1 03/27/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.5 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 1344 1367 62 0 73 Future Vol, veh/h 0 1344 1367 62 0 73 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, #- 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 1461 1486 67 0 79 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All - 0 - 0 - 777 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - - - - - 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - - 0 340 Stage 1 0 - - - 0 - Stage 2 0 - - - 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - 340 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 18.8 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) - - - 340 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - -0.233 HCM Control Delay (s) - - - 18.8 HCM Lane LOS - - - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - - 0.9 109 HCM 2010 TWSC 3: Michael Blake Blvd & Site Access 2 03/27/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.8 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 158 205 52 152 9 Future Vol, veh/h 7 158 205 52 152 9 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, #0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 8 172 223 57 165 10 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 673 170 175 0 - 0 Stage 1 170 - - - - - Stage 2 503 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5183.3182.218 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver421 874 1401 - - - Stage 1 860 - - - - - Stage 2 607 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver352 874 1401 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver352 - - - - - Stage 1 719 - - - - - Stage 2 607 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s10.6 6.4 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1401 - 822 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.159 -0.218 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.1 0 10.6 - - HCM Lane LOS A A B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 - 0.8 - - 110 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: SR 434 & Doran Dr 03/27/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 11 1674 16 13 1530 7 7 0 9 8 2 35 Future Volume (vph) 11 1674 16 13 1530 7 7 0 9 8 2 35 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 330 0 365 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 50 50 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.999 0.999 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.962 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 3502 0 1805 3502 0 0 1805 1615 0 1680 1429 Flt Permitted 0.131 0.107 0.751 0.764 Satd. Flow (perm) 249 3502 0 203 3502 0 0 1427 1615 0 1334 1429 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 1 110 70 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 1139 1456 348 488 Travel Time (s) 17.3 22.1 9.5 13.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 3% 0% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 11% 0% 13% Adj. Flow (vph) 12 1762 17 14 1611 7 7 0 9 8 2 37 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 12 1779 0 14 1618 0 0 7 9 0 10 37 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 45 45 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 7 4 111 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: SR 434 & Doran Dr 03/27/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Permitted Phases 2 6 8 8 4 4 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 8 8 8 7 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 15.0 6.0 15.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 15.0 33.8 13.6 37.8 16.1 16.1 16.1 14.0 32.0 32.0 Total Split (s) 24.0 115.0 18.0 109.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 18.0 37.0 37.0 Total Split (%) 14.1% 67.6% 10.6% 64.1% 11.2% 11.2% 11.2% 10.6% 21.8% 21.8% Maximum Green (s) 16.8 108.2 10.9 102.2 11.8 11.8 11.8 11.7 29.8 29.8 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 All-Red Time (s) 2.4 2.0 2.3 2.0 3.8 3.8 3.8 2.9 3.8 3.8 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.2 6.8 7.1 6.8 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max None Max None None None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 19.0 19.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 32.0 32.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 147.7 147.1 147.8 147.0 8.1 8.1 8.1 8.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.86 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.04 0.59 0.06 0.53 0.10 0.05 0.16 0.28 Control Delay 2.0 5.6 2.6 4.6 80.9 0.6 83.6 6.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 2.0 5.6 2.6 4.6 80.9 0.6 83.6 6.3 LOS A A A A F A F A Approach Delay 5.6 4.6 35.7 22.8 Approach LOS A A D C 90th %ile Green (s) 6.0 134.4 6.0 134.3 8.5 8.5 8.5 0.0 8.5 8.5 90th %ile Term Code Min Coord Min Coord Hold Hold Hold Skip Gap Gap 70th %ile Green (s) 6.0 134.9 6.0 134.8 8.0 8.0 8.0 0.0 8.0 8.0 70th %ile Term Code Min Coord Min Coord Min Min Min Skip Min Min 50th %ile Green (s) 0.0 148.0 0.0 148.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 0.0 8.0 8.0 50th %ile Term Code Skip Coord Skip Coord Min Min Min Skip Min Min 30th %ile Green (s) 0.0 148.0 0.0 148.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 0.0 8.0 8.0 30th %ile Term Code Skip Coord Skip Coord Hold Hold Hold Skip Min Min 10th %ile Green (s) 0.0 163.2 0.0 163.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10th %ile Term Code Skip Coord Skip Coord Skip Skip Skip Skip Skip Skip Queue Length 50th (ft) 1 211 2 101 8 0 11 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 4 443 m4 266 26 0 34 5 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1059 1376 268 408 Turn Bay Length (ft) 330 365 Base Capacity (vph) 374 3029 281 3028 99 214 233 308 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.03 0.59 0.05 0.53 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.12 Intersection Summary 112 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: SR 434 & Doran Dr 03/27/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 170 Actuated Cycle Length: 170 Offset: 114 (67%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 105 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.59 Intersection Signal Delay: 5.5 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 14: SR 434 & Doran Dr 113 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 8: Tuskawilla Rd & SR 434 03/27/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 52 1180 514 226 1084 89 516 135 188 126 158 0 Future Volume (vph) 52 1180 514 226 1084 89 516 135 188 126 158 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 315 450 370 0 525 0 150 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 50 50 100 50 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.989 0.913 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 3505 1599 1787 3498 0 3400 1735 0 1752 1881 0 Flt Permitted 0.120 0.061 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 217 3505 1599 115 3498 0 3400 1735 0 1752 1881 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 408 6 36 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 30 Link Distance (ft) 1456 435 3056 544 Travel Time (s) 22.1 6.6 46.3 12.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 3% 1% 1% 2% 3% 3% 0% 0% 3% 1% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) 54 1229 535 235 1129 93 538 141 196 131 165 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 54 1229 535 235 1222 0 538 337 0 131 165 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 45 32 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt NAcustom pm+pt NA Split NA Split NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 4 4 114 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 8: Tuskawilla Rd & SR 434 03/27/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Permitted Phases 2 8 6 Detector Phase 5 2 8 1 6 8 8 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 15.0 6.0 6.0 15.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 13.3 50.0 40.0 13.8 34.9 40.0 40.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 18.0 77.0 40.0 23.0 82.0 40.0 40.0 30.0 30.0 Total Split (%) 10.6% 45.3% 23.5% 13.5% 48.2% 23.5% 23.5% 17.6% 17.6% Maximum Green (s) 10.7 70.1 31.3 15.6 75.1 31.3 31.3 22.5 22.5 Yellow Time (s) 4.9 4.9 4.8 4.8 4.9 4.8 4.8 3.4 3.4 All-Red Time (s) 2.4 2.0 3.9 2.6 2.0 3.9 3.9 4.1 4.1 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.3 6.9 8.7 7.4 6.9 8.7 8.7 7.5 7.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max None None Max None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 33.0 41.0 21.0 41.0 41.0 40.0 40.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 77.7 70.1 33.8 93.0 81.3 33.8 33.8 19.2 19.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.46 0.41 0.20 0.55 0.48 0.20 0.20 0.11 0.11 v/c Ratio 0.32 0.85 0.83 1.05 0.73 0.80 0.90 0.66 0.78 Control Delay 25.0 49.1 28.8 117.5 39.7 74.7 86.2 88.2 97.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 25.0 49.1 28.8 117.5 40.3 74.7 86.2 88.2 97.2 LOS C D C F D E F F F Approach Delay 42.4 52.8 79.1 93.2 Approach LOS D D E F 90th %ile Green (s) 10.1 70.1 31.3 15.6 75.7 31.3 31.3 22.5 22.5 90th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Max Max Coord Max Max Max Max 70th %ile Green (s) 8.8 70.1 31.3 15.6 77.0 31.3 31.3 22.5 22.5 70th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Max Max Coord Max Max Max Max 50th %ile Green (s) 8.0 70.1 33.7 15.6 77.8 33.7 33.7 20.1 20.1 50th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Max Max Coord Max Max Gap Gap 30th %ile Green (s) 7.1 70.1 36.4 15.6 78.7 36.4 36.4 17.4 17.4 30th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Max Max Coord Max Max Gap Gap 10th %ile Green (s) 0.0 70.1 36.1 19.9 97.4 36.1 36.1 13.4 13.4 10th %ile Term Code Skip Coord Gap Max Coord Gap Gap Gap Gap Queue Length 50th (ft) 28 650 199 ~232 588 298 336 142 181 Queue Length 95th (ft) m54 575 #434 #424 695 #392 #552 217 265 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1376 355 2976 464 Turn Bay Length (ft) 315 450 370 525 150 Base Capacity (vph) 197 1445 644 224 1676 675 373 231 248 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 173 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.27 0.85 0.83 1.05 0.81 0.80 0.90 0.57 0.67 Intersection Summary 115 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 8: Tuskawilla Rd & SR 434 03/27/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 170 Actuated Cycle Length: 170 Offset: 77 (45%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 135 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.05 Intersection Signal Delay: 56.4 Intersection LOS: E Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.2% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 8: Tuskawilla Rd & SR 434 116 HCM 6th TWSC Projected Traffic Volumes 6: SR 434 & Michael Blake Blvd P.M. Peak Hour TPD, Inc.Synchro 9 Report 03/27/2019 Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 205 1360 13 38 1335 77 8 3 25 99 5 76 Future Vol, veh/h 205 1360 13 38 1335 77 8 3 25 99 5 76 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 330 - - 0 - - - - 0 - - 100 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 93 93 92 92 93 93 92 92 92 93 92 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 3 2 2 2 17 2 2 2 0 2 0 Mvmt Flow 220 1462 14 41 1435 83 9 3 27 106 5 82 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1518 0 0 1476 0 0 2711 3509 738 2732 3475 759 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1909 1909 - 1559 1559 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 802 1600 - 1173 1916 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.5 6.54 6.9 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.5 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.5 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.5 4.02 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 446 - - 452 - - 10 6 360 ~ 10 6 353 Stage 1 - - - - - - 70 115 - 120 172 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 344 164 - 207 114 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 446 - - 452 - - - ~ 3 360 - ~ 3 353 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - ~ 3 - - ~ 3 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 35 58 - ~ 61 156 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 232 149 - ~ 92 58 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 2.7 0.4 HCM LOS - - Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) - 360 446 - - 452 - - - 353 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.075 0.494 - - 0.091 - - - 0.232 HCM Control Delay (s) - 15.8 20.7 - - 13.8 - - - 18.2 HCM Lane LOS - C C - - B - - - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.2 2.7 - - 0.3 - - - 0.9 Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 117 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: SR 434 & Michael Blake Blvd 03/27/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 205 1360 13 38 1335 77 8 3 25 99 5 76 Future Volume (vph) 205 1360 13 38 1335 77 8 3 25 99 5 76 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 330 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 50 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.999 0.992 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.964 0.954 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 3502 0 1770 3483 0 0 1796 1583 0 1811 1615 Flt Permitted 0.043 0.103 0.849 0.727 Satd. Flow (perm) 82 3502 0 192 3483 0 0 1581 1583 0 1380 1615 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 1 4 127 127 Link Speed (mph) 50 50 30 25 Link Distance (ft) 441 1255 478 628 Travel Time (s) 6.0 17.1 10.9 17.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.92 0.93 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 3% 2% 2% 2% 17% 2% 2% 2% 0% 2% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) 220 1462 14 41 1435 83 9 3 27 106 5 82 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 220 1476 0 41 1518 0 0 12 27 0 111 82 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 32 32 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 118 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: SR 434 & Michael Blake Blvd 03/27/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Permitted Phases 2 6 8 8 4 4 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 3 8 8 7 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 15.0 6.0 15.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 22.0 12.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 28.0 28.0 Total Split (s) 39.0 92.0 29.0 82.0 29.0 30.0 30.0 29.0 30.0 30.0 Total Split (%) 21.7% 51.1% 16.1% 45.6% 16.1% 16.7% 16.7% 16.1% 16.7% 16.7% Maximum Green (s) 33.0 86.0 23.0 76.0 23.0 24.0 24.0 23.0 24.0 24.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max None Max None None None None Max Max Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 115.0 104.2 94.1 86.9 53.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.64 0.58 0.52 0.48 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 v/c Ratio 0.83 0.73 0.25 0.90 0.03 0.05 0.27 0.15 Control Delay 78.4 30.9 18.3 51.4 45.5 0.2 51.0 1.3 Queue Delay 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 78.4 33.4 18.3 51.4 45.5 0.2 51.0 1.3 LOS E C B D D A D A Approach Delay 39.2 50.5 14.1 29.9 Approach LOS D D B C 90th %ile Green (s) 30.9 100.0 9.0 78.1 0.0 53.0 53.0 0.0 53.0 53.0 90th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Gap Coord Skip Hold Hold Skip MaxR MaxR 70th %ile Green (s) 25.8 101.4 7.6 83.2 0.0 53.0 53.0 0.0 53.0 53.0 70th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Gap Coord Skip Hold Hold Skip MaxR MaxR 50th %ile Green (s) 22.2 102.0 7.0 86.8 0.0 53.0 53.0 0.0 53.0 53.0 50th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Gap Coord Skip Hold Hold Skip MaxR MaxR 30th %ile Green (s) 18.5 102.6 6.4 90.5 0.0 53.0 53.0 0.0 53.0 53.0 30th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Gap Coord Skip Hold Hold Skip MaxR MaxR 10th %ile Green (s) 13.3 115.0 0.0 95.7 0.0 53.0 53.0 0.0 53.0 53.0 10th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Skip Coord Skip Hold Hold Skip MaxR MaxR Queue Length 50th (ft) 204 671 17 855 10 0 102 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 294 781 34 #1117 28 0 163 6 Internal Link Dist (ft) 361 1175 398 548 Turn Bay Length (ft) 330 100 Base Capacity (vph) 368 2027 317 1682 465 555 406 565 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 408 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.60 0.91 0.13 0.90 0.03 0.05 0.27 0.15 Intersection Summary 119 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: SR 434 & Michael Blake Blvd 03/27/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 125 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.90 Intersection Signal Delay: 43.5 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.1% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 6: SR 434 & Michael Blake Blvd 120 HCM 6th TWSC 17: SR 434 & Site Access 1 03/27/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 1551 1372 47 0 50 Future Vol, veh/h 0 1551 1372 47 0 50 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, #- 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 1686 1491 51 0 54 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All - 0 - 0 - 771 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - - - - - 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - - 0 343 Stage 1 0 - - - 0 - Stage 2 0 - - - 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - 343 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 17.5 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) - - - 343 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - -0.158 HCM Control Delay (s) - - - 17.5 HCM Lane LOS - - - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - - 0.6 121 HCM 6th TWSC 3: Michael Blake Blvd & Site Access 2 03/27/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.4 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 115 124 160 64 6 Future Vol, veh/h 6 115 124 160 64 6 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, #0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 7 125 135 174 70 7 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 518 74 77 0 - 0 Stage 1 74 - - - - - Stage 2 444 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5183.3182.218 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver518 988 1522 - - - Stage 1 949 - - - - - Stage 2 646 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver467 988 1522 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver467 - - - - - Stage 1 856 - - - - - Stage 2 646 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s9.5 3.3 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1522 - 936 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.089 -0.141 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.6 0 9.5 - - HCM Lane LOS A A A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 - 0.5 - - 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 34" H.34" H. X 21" D.30" H.34" H.108DATA/ELEC.111LOUNGE114MEN115WOMEN118CONFERENCE ROOM119BCM122OFFICE101VESTIBULE103LOBBY113CORRIDOR105TELLER102LTOS / CASH ROOM123OFFICE104LIVING ROOMBOOTHBOOTH110JANITOR112PRINT/FILEPROJECT INFORMATION BLOCKSHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERISSUE/BYDATEDESCRIPTIONSEALTHESE DRAWINGS AND PLANS, ANY REPRODUCTION THEREOF, AND ANYCAD OR ELECTRONIC FILE OF THESE DRAWINGS AND PLANS (HEREINAFTER“PLANS”) ARE THE SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE, PROPRIETARY PROPERTY OF BDGARCHITECTS, AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED, PUBLISHED, MODIFIED ORUSED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BDGARCHITECTS. USE OF THESE PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION SHALL BECONSIDERED ACCEPTANCE OF THE TERMS CONTAINED HEREIN AND THESUITABILITY AND CONSTRUCTABILITY OF THE PLANS.¬ THE PLANS SHALL NOTBE SCALED OR MODIFIED FOR ANY PURPOSE WITHOUT THE EXPRESSWRITTEN APPROVAL OF BDG ARCHITECTS. ANY CHANGES TO THESEPLANS, REGARDLESS OF HOW MINOR, WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTENAPPROVAL OF BDG ARCHITECTS; ANY CONSTRUCTION EXECUTED FROMTHESE PLANS WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN APPROVAL OF BDGARCHITECTS; OR ANY CHANGE IN THE SCOPE, DESIGN, OR INTENT OFTHESE PLANS FOR ANY REASON, BY ANY PERSON OTHER THAN BDGARCHITECTS SHALL AUTOMATICALLY VOID ANY DESIGN-RELATEDOBLIGATIONS BDG ARCHITECTS MAY HAVE ON THE PROJECT, AND RESULTIN THE FULL AND COMPLETE RELEASE OF BDG ARCHITECTS FROM ANYLIABILITY, CLAIMS, OR DAMAGES INCLUDING ERRORS AND OMISSIONSARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THE PLANS.¬ANY DISCREPANCIES ORCONFLICTS IN THE PLANS SHALL BE REFERRED IMMEDIATELY TO BDGARCHITECTS FOR CLARIFICATION PRIOR TO CONTINUING WITH THE WORK.FAILURE TO REFER DISCREPANCIES OR CONFLICTS TO BDG ARCHITECTSPRIOR TO PERFORMING WORK SHALL RESULT IN THE WAIVER OF ANYCLAIMS OR DAMAGES ASSOCIATED WITH THE DISCREPANCIES ORCONFLICTS.¬THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COORDINATION,SCHEDULING AND CONFORMANCE OF ITS WORK AND ALL WORKPERFORMED BY SUBCONTRACTORS OR OTHER TRADES WITH THE DESIGNDOCUMENTS.Architect of Record:Gregg A. Holdsworth, AIA LEED APFlorida RegistrationLicense No. AR0017669JPM Chase Retail Banking Center10755 Starkey Road,Largo, FL 33777Bryan Dairy Roadand Starkey RoadJOB #:DATE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:18401710-04-2018TN400 N. Ashley Dr.,Ste. 600Tampa, FL 33602P: 813 - 323 - 9233Lic. #: AA - 0003590www.bdgllp.combdgarchitectsA1.3JL6(&85,7<&$0(5$3/$1SCALEFURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT PLAN 11/4"=1'-0"NSITE REQUIRES:35 IPS AND35 PORTS - CAT.6 CABLING FOR:24 CAMERAS, 3EATMS,2DU ATMs, 3 MONITORS, DMP, DVR and PARABIT-6 ANALOG CABLES FOR:3 EATMS and3MONITORS990990102TETTELLERTETTTTTTELLTTELLETELLTETETEEEEEEEEELLLLELELERLELLELLLEEEEERR990QUEUE LINEMONITOR NEEDSDECODERFRONT ENTRANCEFACIAL ID - MAYREQUIRE 80 MM LENSCARD READEROVERVIEW - OPPOSITESIDE OF READERCUSTOMER FRONTEXIT ID - EITHERLOCATION,NOT BOTHCAM 1CAM 2CAM 3CAM 4CAM 5CAM 6CAM 7CAM 8CAM 9CAM 10CAM 11CAM 12CAM 15CAM 13CAM 18CAM 17CAM 16CAM 14CAM 19CAM 20CAM 21CAM 27ANA 3CAM 26ANA 2CAM 25ANA 1CAM 24CAM 23CAM 22CAM 28ANA 4MON 1CAM 29ANA 5MON 2CAM 30ANA 6MON 3NOTE 2: EXTERIOR 180 CAMERAS TO BEMOUNTED AT 12 FEET WHEN POSSIBLENOTE 1: ALL EATMS/ATMS [EXCEPT FOR NEW NCR 2043/2045]AND MONITORS WILL NOW GET BOTH CAT.6A CABLE ANDANALOG CABLE. GTI TO PROVIDE THE CAT.6A AND NAVCOTO PROVIDE THE SIAMESE RG 59/U / 18/2 CABLE.M. KULICK 10-25-18 135 ©CHASE BANKTUSKAWILLAPHOTOMETRIC PLANC1.00NORTH136 TREESCODEQTYCOMMON NAMECONTCALSIZECT 7 VUA CANOPY TREE FG 2.5" CAL MIN 14` HT., 5` SPR.STRAIGHT, SINGLE LEADER,FULL, FL #1ST 7 STREETSCAPE CANOPY TREE FG 2.5" CAL MIN 14` HT., 5` SPR.STRAIGHT, SINGLE LEADER,FULL, FL #1SHRUBSCODEQTYCOMMON NAMECONTSPACINGSIZESS 17 SCREENING SHRUB 7 GAL 36" OC 36" HT MINFULLSHRUB AREASCODEQTYCOMMON NAMECONTSIZESPACINGSA 1,293 SF GENERAL PLANTINGS 3 GAL - -PLANT SCHEDULELANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTSCODE REQUIRED PROPOSEDSECTION 20-324MIN. 1 TREE PER ISLAND6 TREES 7 TREESBUFFER REQUIREMENTS: SEC. 20-605TREES SPACED A MINIMUM OF 15 O.C.STREETSCAPE AREA WIDTH MIN. 27'BUFFER A: 137 LF7 TREES @ 20' O.C.BUFFER A:137 LF7 TREES @ 20' O.C. LOCATEDWITHIN SUBJECT PROPERTY©CHASE BANKTUSKAWILLALANDSCAPE PLANL1.00NORTHMISC.QTYBOTANICAL/COMMON NAMESPECIFICATIONSMULCH TBD EUCALYPTUS MULCH 3" DEPTH MINIMUM, SHREDDED,FREE OF WEEDS/INVASIVE PLANT MATERIALSOD TBD PASPALUM NOTATUM 'ARGENTINE'/ ARGENTINE BAHIA GRASS ROLLED TIGHT, 100% WEED/INSECT/DISEASE FREE137 ©CHASE BANKTUSKAWILLALANDSCAPE DETAILSL1.50436789101153X ROOTBALL WIDTH MIN.12" TYP.TRUNK/ROOT BALL TO BE CENTERED ANDPLUMB/LEVEL IN PLANTING PIT.16" DIA. CLEAR OF MULCH AT TRUNK FLARE.23" MINIMUM MULCH AS SPECIFIED. WHERETREES ARE PLACED IN SOD, MULCH RINGFOR TREES SHALL BE 6' DIAMETER (MIN.) ORAS DIRECTED BY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE.34" HIGH BERM, FIRMLY COMPACTED.4TREE FROG ANCHOR SYSTEM INSTALLED PERMANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS.5FINISHED GRADE. (SEE GRADING PLAN)6TOP OF ROOTBALL MIN. 1" ABOVE FINISHEDGRADE.7PREPARED PLANTING SOIL AS SPECIFIED.8TOP OF ROOTBALL SHALL BE 1" ABOVEFINISHED GRADE. ROOTBALLS GREATERTHAN 24" DIAMETER SHALL BE PLACED ONMOUND OF UNDISTURBED SOIL TO PREVENTSETTLING. ROOTBALLS SMALLER THAN 24" INDIAMETER MAY SIT ON COMPACTED EARTH.9UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL.10SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF PLANTINGPIT.11TREE PLANTINGSECTION / PLANPLANSECTIONMULCH/TOPSOIL BACKFILLROOTBALL AND TRUNKTREE STABILIZATION ANDFERTILIZATION SYSTEMNOTES:A. FINAL TREE STAKING DETAILS AND PLACEMENT TOBE APPROVED BY OWNER.B. REMOVE BURLAP, WIRE AND STRAPS (ANYTHINGTHAT COULD GIRDLE TREE OR RESTRICT ROOTGROWTH) ON UPPER 1/3 OF ROOTBALL.C. PRUNE ALL TREES IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSIA-300.12NTS1L1.50TREE PLANTING ON A SLOPESECTION / PLANNTSPLANSECTIONMULCH/TOPSOIL BACKFILLROOTBALL AND TRUNKTREE STABILIZATION ANDFERTILIZATION SYSTEMNOTES:A. FINAL TREE STAKING DETAILS AND PLACEMENT TOBE APPROVED BY OWNER.B. REMOVE BURLAP, WIRE AND STRAPS (ANYTHINGTHAT COULD GIRDLE TREE OR RESTRICT ROOTGROWTH) ON UPPER 1/3 OF ROOTBALL.C. PRUNE ALL TREES IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSIA-300.2461217389105113X ROOTBALLWIDTH MIN.12" TYP.TRUNK/ROOT BALL TO BE CENTERED ANDPLUMB/LEVEL IN PLANTING PIT.16" DIA. CLEAR OF MULCH AT TRUNK FLARE.23. 4" HIGH BERM, FIRMLY COMPACTED.33" MINIMUM OF HARDWOOD BARK MULCHAS SPECIFIED. WHERE TREES ARE PLACEDIN SOD, MULCH RING FOR TREES SHALL BE6' DIAMETER (MIN.) OR AS DIRECTED BYOWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE.4TREE FROG ANCHOR SYSTEM INSTALLED PERMANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS.54" MIN. OF TOPSOIL TO BRING TO FINISHEDGRADE. (SEE GRADING PLAN)6TOP OF ROOTBALL MIN. 1" ABOVE FINISHEDGRADE.7PREPARED PLANTING SOIL AS SPECIFIED.8ROOTBALLS GREATER THAN 24" DIAMETERSHALL BE PLACED ON MOUND OFUNDISTURBED SOIL TO PREVENT SETTLING.ROOTBALLS SMALLER THAN 24" INDIAMETER MAY SIT ON COMPACTED EARTH.9UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL.10SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF PLANTINGPIT.11CUT BACK SLOPE TO PROVIDE A FLATSURFACE FOR PLANTING.12L1.502MAINTAIN 12" DEAD ZONEAT BED EDGE.REFER TO PLANTSCHEDULE FOR SPACING.BEST FACE OF SHRUB/GROUNDCOVER TO FACEFRONT OF PLANTING BED.NOTES:A. CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE PERCOLATION OF ALL PLANTING PITS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.B. WHEN SHRUBS ARE PRUNED IN MASSES, PRUNE ALL SHRUBS TO ACHIEVE UNIFORM MASS / HEIGHT.C. ALL SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVERS SHALL BE PLUMB VERTICALLY, UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY OWNERSREPRESENTATIVE.4"TYP.3X ROOT BALL WIDTH MINIMUM13410'X'588676792SHRUB/GROUNDCOVER PLANTINGSECTION / PLANNTSPLANSECTIONTOP OF SHRUB ROOTBALLS TOBE PLANTED 1" - 2" HIGH WITHSOIL MOUNDING UP TO THE TOPOF ROOTBALL.1PRUNE ALL SHRUBS TOACHIEVE A UNIFORMMASS/HEIGHT.23" MULCH LAYER ASSPECIFIED.3EXCAVATE ENTIRE BEDSPECIFIED FOR GROUNDCOVERBED.4FINISHED GRADE (SEEGRADING PLAN).5PREPARED PLANTING SOIL ASSPECIFIED. (SEE LANDSCAPENOTES) NOTE: WHEN GROUND-COVERS AND SHRUBS USED INMASSES, ENTIRE BED TO BEAMENDED WITH PLANTING SOILMIX AS SPECIFIED.6SCARIFY OF PLANTING PITSIDES AND BOTTOM.74" HIGH BERM FIRMLYCOMPACTED.8UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL.9FERTILIZER TABLETS (MAX 3"DEEP)10L1.503NOTES:A. EXCAVATE A CONTINUOUS 24" DEEP PIT (FROM TOP OF CURB) FOR ENTIRE LENGTH AND WIDTH OFISLAND & BACKFILL WITH APPROVED PLANTING MIX.B. PROTECT AND RETAIN ALL CURBS AND BASE. COMPACTED SUBGRADE TO REMAIN FOR STRUCTURALSUPPORT OF CURB SYSTEM (TYP).C. ALL ISLANDS SHALL UTILIZE POOR DRAINAGE DETAIL WHEN PERCOLATION RATES ARE 2" PER HOUROR LESS.WIDTH VARIES - SEE PLANSSEE NOTE123PLANTED PARKING LOT ISLANDS/MEDIANSSECTIONNTSCROWN ISLANDS @ 5:1 SLOPES (OR AS SPECIFIED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS).1CLEAR ZONE: 36" MIN. FROM BACK OF CURB TO CENTER OF NEAREST SHRUB. CLEARZONE SHALL CONTAIN 3" CONTINUOUS MULCH OR TURF, SEE PLANS.22" MIN VERTICAL CLEARANCE, TOP OF CURB TO TOP OF MULCH.3L1.504EXISTING GRADE(DASHED)NOTES:A. CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE PERCOLATION OF ALL PLANTINGPITS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.B. WHEN SHRUBS ARE PRUNED IN MASSES, PRUNE ALL SHRUBS TOACHIEVE UNIFORM MASS / HEIGHT.C. ALL SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVERS SHALL BE PLUMBVERTICALLY, UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY OWNERSREPRESENTATIVE.1234567894" TYP.3X ROOT BALLWIDTH MINIMUMSHRUB/GROUNDCOVER PLANTING ON A SLOPESECTIONNTSTOP OF SHRUB ROOTBALLS TO BEPLANTED 1" - 2" HIGH WITH SOILMOUNDING UP TO THE TOP OFROOTBALL.1PRUNE SHRUBS AS DIRECTED BYOWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE.23" MINIMUM OF MULCH ASSPECIFIED. WHERE SHRUBS AREPLACED IN MASSES, MULCH SHALLBE SPREAD IN A CONTINUOUS BED.3SOIL BERM TO HOLD WATER. TOPOF PLANTING PIT 'BERM' TO BELEVEL ACROSS PIT. SLOPEDOWNHILL PORTION OF BERM ASREQUIRED TO MEET EXISTINGGRADE. MULCH OVER EXPOSEDTOPSOIL.4FINISHED GRADE (SEE GRADINGPLAN)5PREPARED PLANTING SOIL ASSPECIFIED. (SEE LANDSCAPENOTES).6SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OFPLANTING PIT.7FERTILIZER TABLETS (MAX 3"DEEP).8UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL9L1.505NOTES:1. CLEAR ZONE: 36" MIN. FROM BUILDING TO CENTER OF NEAREST SHRUB.2. INSTALL SPECIFIED MULCH: 24" MIN. FROM BUILDING. SPECIFIED MULCH TO BE INSTALLED ATA DEPTH OF 3" (MIN.)PLANTINGS ADJACENT TO BUILDINGSSECTIONNTS24" MIN. CLEARMIN. 1/2MATURESHRUB WIDTHBUILDING SPECIFIEDMULCHL1.5062'-0"MIN. CLR.MIN. 1/2 MATURE SHRUB WIDTH12PARKING SPACE/CURB PLANTINGSECTIONNTSINSTALL CONTINUOUS MULCH BED ADJACENT TO PARKING SPACES AS SHOWN.MULCH SHALL BE MIN. 3" DEEP. NO POP-UP IRRIGATION HEADS SHALL BELOCATED WITHIN 24" OF A PARKING SPACE ON ANY SIDE.1CURB / PARKING LOT EDGE.2L1.5077'-6"7'-6"7'-6"MIN.12 MATURESHRUB WIDTHMIN. 15' CLEARMIN.12 MATURESHRUB WIDTHFIRE HYDRANT123SHRUB PLANTING AT FIRE HYDRANTSECTION / PLANNTSPLANSECTIONFIRE HYDRANT.1NO PLANT EXCEEDING 12"MATURE HEIGHTMATERIAL SHALL BEPLACED WITHIN SHOWNRADIUS OF ALLPROPOSED OR EXISTINGFIRE HYDRANTS.CONTRACTOR SHALLADJUST PLANTMATERIAL SO THAT NOCONFLICTS WITH FIREHYDRANTS OCCUR ONSITE.2FRONT OF HYDRANT(TOWARD CURB)3L1.508LIMITS OF PLANTINGPITNOTES:A. THIS DETAIL SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED WHEREPERCOLATION RATES ARE 2" PER HOUR ORLESS.B. CONTRACTOR TO PERFORM PERCOLATION TESTAS REQUIRED. AND NOTIFY OWNER/LANDSCAPEARCHITECT.C. SEE TYPICAL TREE PLANTING DETAIL THIS SHEETFOR PLANT STAKING.3X ROOTBALLDIAMETER12345678569POOR DRAINAGE CONDITIONSECTION / PLANNTSPLANSECTIONFINISH GRADE (SEE GRADING PLANS).1BACKFILL WITH PREPARED PLANTINGSOIL MIX AS SPECIFIED.2FILTER CLOTH, MIRAFI 500X OR BETTER.3SLOPE BOTTOM TO DRAIN.4AUGURED HOLE Ø ±18" PENETRATETHROUGH OCCLUDING LAYER TO WATERTABLE OR TO A DEPTH OF 7' TO ASSUREPROPER PERCOLATION.5BACKFILL WITH 1/2" - 3/4" GRAVEL TOREQUIRED DEPTH THROUGH OCCLUDINGLAYER TO ASSURE PROPERPERCOLATION.6WATER TABLE. (DEPTH VARIES)7UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL.8SET ROOTBALL ON UNDISTURBED STABLESUBSOIL SO THAT TOP OF ROOT BALL IS1" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE.9ROOTBALLTRUNKL1.509INSTALLATION NOTES:NOTE: IF WIRE TIES ARE USED, AVOID DIRECT CONTACT WITHFENCE. WIRE MAY DAMAGE FENCE OVER TIME.A. POST SELECTION SHOULD BE BASED ON EXPECTEDSTRENGTH NEEDS AND THE LENGTH OF TIME FENCE WILLBE IN PLACE. FLEXIBLE FIBERGLASS ROD POSTS ARERECOMMENDED FOR PARKS, ATHLETIC EVENTS ANDCROWD CONTROL INSTALLATIONS. METAL "T" POSTS ORTREATED WOOD POSTS ARE TYPICALLY USED FORCONSTRUCTION AND OTHER APPLICATIONS.B. POSTS SHOULD BE DRIVEN INTO THE GROUND TO A DEPTHOF 1/3 OF THE HEIGHT OF THE POST. FOR EXAMPLE, A 6'POST SHOULD BE SET AT LEAST 2' INTO THE GROUND.C. SPACE POSTS EVERY 6' (MIN.) TO 8' (MAX.).D. SECURE FENCING TO POST WITH NYLON CABLE TIES(AVAILABLE FROM CONWED PLASTICS). WOOD STRIPS MAYBE ALSO BE USED TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SUPPORT ANDPROTECTION BETWEEN TIES AND POSTS.6'MIN.12CORNERCONNECTIONCONNECTIONTREE PROTECTION FENCINGELEVATION / PLANNTS6'H "PERIMETER PLUS" CONSTRUCTIONFENCE BY CONWED PLASTICS OR OWNER'SREPRESENTATIVE APPROVED EQUAL.SUBMIT PRODUCT INFORMATION FORAPPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.18' TALL METAL "T" POSTS OR 2" x 2" X 8'PRESSURE TREATED WOOD POSTS WITH 24"BURIAL BELOW GRADE.2ELEVATIONPLANDRIPLINE(TYP.)DRIPLINE(TYP.)L1.5010PALM PLANTINGSECTION / PLANNTSOA =OVERALL PALMHEIGHT (MEASUREDTO TOP OF BUD)CT =CLEAR TRUNK(MEASURED TOBOTTOM OFLEAF SHEATHS)GW =GRAY WOOD(MEASURED TO TOPOF HARDENEDTRUNK)NOTES:A. FINAL TREE STAKING DETAILS AND PLACEMENTTO BE APPROVED BY OWNER.B. ALL TREE STAKING IS TO BE WITHIN MULCH BEDAREA OUTSIDE TREE PIT.C. CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE PERCOLATION OFALL PLANTING PITS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION -REFER TO POOR DRAINAGE CONDITION DETAIL.12"1234567PLANSECTION4895 LAYERS OF BURLAP TO PROTECTTRUNK.1FIVE 2" X 4" X 18" WOOD BATTENS.2SECURE BATTENS WITH 2- 3/4" CARBONSTEEL BANDS TO HOLD BATTENS INPLACE. NO NAILS SHALL BE DRIVEN INTOPALM. HEIGHT OF BATTENS SHALL BELOCATED IN RELATION TO THE HEIGHT OFTHE PALM FOR ADEQUATE BRACING.3(3) 2"X4"X8' SUPPORTS. NAIL (DRILL ANNAIL IF NECESSARY) TO BATTENS AND 2"4" STAKES. STAIN DARK BROWN.43" SPECIFIED MULCH5BERM SOIL TO HOLD WATER.6FINISH GRADE72X4X24" (MIN) P.T. WOOD STAKES (TYP.)NAIL TO SUPPORT POLES.8PREPARED PLANTING SOIL AS SPECIFIED.(SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES).911L1.501. BASE OF TREE SHALL BE PLANTED SLIGHTLY ABOVE(1" MIN.) ADJACENT FINISH GRADE. REMOVE ALLTWINE & STRAPS & CUT BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OFROOT BALL. NO SYNTHETIC BURLAP WILL BEACCEPTED.2. 4" SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH OR APPROVEDEQUAL.3. DIAMETER OF TREE PIT TO BE TWICE THE DIAMETEROF ROOT BALL-ROUGHEN SIDES OF TREE PIT.4. 3" HIGH SOIL BERM TO HOLD WATER.5. TOPSOIL MIX BACKFILL.6. TREE WRAP.7. 4" MIN. OF TOPSOIL TO BRING TO FINISHED GRADE(SEE GRADING PLAN).8. ROOT BALLS GREATER THAN 24" DIAMETER SHALLBE PLACED ON MOUND OF UNDISTURBED SOIL TOPREVENT SETTLING ROOT BALLS SMALLER THAN 24"IN DIA. MAY SIT ON COMPACTED EARTH.9. UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL.10. PREPARE PLANTING SOIL AS SPECIFIED.11.Tree Frog® RBK40ptFOR UP TO 4" TREE CALIPER ORTree Frog® RBK60ptFOR GREATER THAN 4" AND UPTO 6" TREE CALIPER. REFER TO SITEWORKSPECIFICATIONS FOR APPROVED MATERIALS ANDINSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS.PLANSECTIONNOTES:A. FINAL TREE STAKING DETAILS AND PLACEMENT TO BEAPPROVED BY OWNER.B. SET TREE AT ORIGINAL DEPTH. REMOVE BURLAP, WIRE ANDSTRAPS (ANYTHING THAT COULD GIRDLE TREE OR RESTRICTROOT GROWTH) ON UPPER 1/3 OF ROOTBALL.C. SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES FOR THE TYPE OF MULCH MATERIALTO USE.D. PRUNE TREE AS DIRECTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTE. ASSURE PERCOLATION OF ALL PLANTING PITSOVERALL HEIGHT (O.H.)CLEAR TRUNK (C.T.)HEIGHT12"TYP.1234589101176TREE STAKINGMULCH/TOPSOILBACKFILLROOTBALLAND TRUNKMULTI-TRUNK TREE PLANTINGSECTION/PLANNTS12L1.50138 ©CHASE BANKTUSKAWILLALANDSCAPESPECIFICATIONSL1.51TYPICAL LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS (FLORIDA)A. SCOPE OF WORK1. THE WORK CONSISTS OF: FURNISHING ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, TOOLS, TRANSPORTATION, AND ANY OTHER APPURTENANCESNECESSARY FOR THE COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS, AS INCLUDED IN THE PLANT LIST, AND AS SPECIFIEDHEREIN.2. WORK SHALL INCLUDE MAINTENANCE AND WATERING OF ALL CONTRACT PLANTING AREAS UNTIL CERTIFICATION OF ACCEPTANCE BY THEOWNER.B. PROTECTION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES1. ALL EXISTING BUILDINGS, WALKS, WALLS, PAVING, PIPING, OTHER SITE CONSTRUCTION ITEMS, AND PLANTING ALREADY COMPLETED ORESTABLISHED AND DESIGNATED TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE BY THE CONTRACTOR UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. ALLDAMAGE RESULTING FROM NEGLIGENCE SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER, AT NO COST TO THEOWNER.2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING ALL NECESSARY BMP DEVICES ACCORDING TO ALL REGULATORY AGENCY'SSTANDARDS THROUGH THE DURATION OF ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A DETAILED PROJECT SPECIFIC WORK ZONE TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN UNLESS THE WORK REQUIRES NOTHINGMORE THAN A DIRECT APPLICATION OF FDOT DESIGN STANDARDS, INDEX 600. IF A DIRECT APPLICATION OF INDEX 600 IS PROPOSED, THECONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT IN WRITING A STATEMENT INDICATING THE STANDARD INDEX AND PAGE NUMBER NO LESS THAN 10 BUSINESSDAYS PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. WHEN A DIRECT APPLICATION OF FDOT STANDARD INDEX 600 IS NOT ACCEPTABLE A PROJECTSPECIFIC WORK ZONE TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN SHALL BE PREPARED BY A FLORIDA PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER WHO HAS SUCCESSFULLYCOMPLETED ADVANCED TRAINING IN MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC, AS DEFINED BY FDOT FOR APPROVAL BY THE COUNTY ENGINEER'SREPRESENTATIVE.4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL UTILITIES, WHETHER PUBLIC OR PRIVATE, PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. THEINFORMATION AND DATA SHOWN WITH RESPECT TO EXISTING UNDERGROUND FACILITIES AT OR CONTIGUOUS TO THE SITE IS APPROXIMATEAND BASED ON INFORMATION FURNISHED BY THE OWNER OF SUCH UNDERGROUND FACILITIES OR ON PHYSICAL APPURTENANCES OBSERVEDIN THE FIELD. THE OWNER AND DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ACCURACY AND COMPLETENESS OF ANY SUCHINFORMATION OR DATA. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR; REVIEWING AND CHECKING ALL SUCH INFORMATION ANDDATA; LOCATING ALL UNDERGROUND FACILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION; THE SAFETY AND PROTECTION THEREOF; REPAIRING ANY DAMAGETHERETO RESULTING FROM THE WORK. THE COST OF ALL WILL BE CONSIDERED AS HAVING BEEN INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACT PRICE. THECONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ANY AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANIES OR AGENCIES IN WRITING AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNINGCONSTRUCTION.C. PROTECTION OF EXISTING PLANT MATERIALS1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL UNAUTHORIZED CUTTING OR DAMAGE TO TREES AND SHRUBS EXISTING OR OTHERWISE,CAUSED BY CARELESS EQUIPMENT OPERATION, MATERIAL STOCKPILING, ETC... THIS SHALL INCLUDE COMPACTION BY DRIVING OR PARKINGINSIDE THE DRIP-LINE AND SPILLING OIL, GASOLINE, OR OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIALS WITHIN THE DRIP-LINE. NO MATERIALS SHALL BEBURNED ON SITE. EXISTING TREES KILLED OR DAMAGED SO THAT THEY ARE MISSHAPEN AND/OR UNSIGHTLY SHALL BE REPLACED AT THE COSTTO THE CONTRACTOR OF THREE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($300) PER CALIPER INCH ON AN ESCALATING SCALE WHICH ADDS AN ADDITIONAL TWENTY(20) PERCENT PER INCH OVER FOUR (4) INCHES CALIPER AS FIXED AND AGREED LIQUIDATED DAMAGES. CALIPER SHALL BE MEASURED SIX (6)INCHES ABOVE GROUND LEVEL FOR TREES UP TO AND INCLUDING FOUR (4) INCHES IN CALIPER AND TWELVE (12) INCHES ABOVE GROUND LEVELFOR TREES OVER FOUR (4) INCHES IN CALIPER.2. SEE TREE MITIGATION PLAN AND NOTES, IF APPLICABLE.D. MATERIALS1. GENERALMATERIAL SAMPLES LISTED BELOW SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL, ON SITE OR AS DETERMINED BY THE OWNER. UPON APPROVAL,DELIVERY OF MATERIALS MAY COMMENCE.MATERIALSAMPLE SIZEMULCH ONE (1) CUBIC FOOTTOPSOIL MIX ONE (1) CUBIC FOOTPLANTS ONE (1) OF EACH VARIETY (OR TAGGED IN NURSERY)2. PLANT MATERIALSa. PLANT SPECIES AND SIZE SHALL CONFORM TO THOSE INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. ALL NURSERY STOCK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITHGRADES AND STANDARDS FOR NURSERY PLANTS, LATEST EDITION, PUBLISHED BY THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ANDCONSUMER SERVICES. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FLORIDA GRADE NO. 1 OR BETTER AS DETERMINED BY THE FLORIDA DIVISION OF PLANT INDUSTRY.ALL PLANTS SHALL BE HEALTHY, VIGOROUS, SOUND, WELL-BRANCHED, AND FREE OF DISEASE AND INSECTS, INSECT EGGS AND LARVAE ANDSHALL HAVE ADEQUATE ROOT SYSTEMS. TREES FOR PLANTING IN ROWS SHALL BE UNIFORM IN SIZE AND SHAPE. ALL MATERIALS SHALL BESUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE OWNER. WHERE ANY REQUIREMENTS ARE OMITTED FROM THE PLANT LIST, THE PLANTS FURNISHED SHALL BENORMAL FOR THE VARIETY. PLANTS SHALL BE PRUNED PRIOR TO DELIVERY ONLY WITH APPROVAL FROM OWNER OR OWNER'SREPRESENTATIVE. NO SUBSTITUTIONS SHALL BE MADE WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE.b. MEASUREMENTS: THE HEIGHT AND/OR WIDTH OF TREES SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE GROUND OR ACROSS THE NORMAL SPREAD OFBRANCHES WITH THE PLANTS IN THEIR NORMAL POSITION. THIS MEASUREMENT SHALL NOT INCLUDE THE IMMEDIATE TERMINAL GROWTH.PLANTS LARGER IN SIZE THAN THOSE SPECIFIED IN THE PLANT LIST MAY BE USED IF APPROVED BY THE OWNER. IF THE USE OF LARGER PLANTSIS APPROVED, THE BALL OF EARTH OR SPREAD OF ROOTS SHALL BE INCREASED IN PROPORTION TO THE SIZE OF THE PLANT.c. INSPECTION: PLANTS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO INSPECTION AND APPROVAL AT THE PLACE OF GROWTH, OR UPON DELIVERY TO THE SITE, ASDETERMINED BY THE OWNER, FOR QUALITY, SIZE, AND VARIETY. SUCH APPROVAL SHALL NOT IMPAIR THE RIGHT OF INSPECTION AND REJECTIONAT THE SITE DURING PROGRESS OF THE WORK OR AFTER COMPLETION FOR SIZE AND CONDITION OF ROOT BALLS OR ROOTS, LATENT DEFECTSOR INJURIES. REJECTED PLANTS SHALL BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY FROM THE SITE. NOTICE REQUESTING INSPECTION SHALL BE SUBMITTED INWRITING BY THE CONTRACTOR AT LEAST ONE (1) WEEK PRIOR TO ANTICIPATED DATE.E. SOIL MIXTURE (PLANTING MEDIUM, PLANTING MIX, TOPSOIL MIX)1. CONTRACTOR SHALL TEST EXISTING SOIL AND AMEND AS NECESSARY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GUIDELINES BELOW:2. SOIL MIXTURE (PLANTING MEDIUM FOR PLANT PITS) SHALL CONSIST OF TWO PARTS OF TOPSOIL AND ONE PART SAND, AS DESCRIBED BELOW.CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT SAMPLES AND PH TESTING RESULTS OF SOIL MIXTURE FOR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE APPROVAL PRIOR TO PLANTINSTALLATION OPERATIONS COMMENCE.a.TOPSOIL FOR USE IN PREPARING SOIL MIXTURE FOR BACKFILLING PLANT PITS SHALL BE FERTILE, FRIABLE, AND OF A LOAMY CHARACTER;REASONABLY FREE OF SUBSOIL, CLAY LUMPS, BRUSH WEEDS AND OTHER LITTER; FREE OF ROOTS, STUMPS, STONES LARGER THAN 2" IN ANYDIRECTION, AND OTHER EXTRANEOUS OR TOXIC MATTER HARMFUL TO PLANT GROWTH. IT SHALL CONTAIN THREE (3) TO FIVE (5) PERCENTDECOMPOSED ORGANIC MATTER AND HAVE A PH BETWEEN 5.5 AND 7.0.b.SAND SHALL BE COARSE, CLEAN, WELL-DRAINING, NATIVE SAND.2. TREES SHALL BE PLANTED IN THE EXISTING NATIVE SOIL ON SITE, UNLESS DETERMINED TO BE UNSUITABLE - AT WHICH POINT THECONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE TO DISCUSS ALTERNATE RECOMMENDATIONPRIOR TO PLANTING.F. WATER1. WATER NECESSARY FOR PLANTING AND MAINTENANCE SHALL BE OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY TO SUSTAIN ADEQUATE PLANT GROWTH ANDSHALL NOT CONTAIN HARMFUL, NATURAL OR MAN-MADE ELEMENTS DETRIMENTAL TO PLANTS. WATER MEETING THE ABOVE STANDARD SHALLBE OBTAINED ON THE SITE FROM THE OWNER, IF AVAILABLE, AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR ITSUSE BY HIS TANKS, HOSES, SPRINKLERS, ETC.... IF SUCH WATER IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THE SITE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDESATISFACTORY WATER FROM SOURCES OFF THE SITE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.* WATERING/IRRIGATION RESTRICTIONS MAY APPLY - REFER TO PROPERTY'S JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY.G. FERTILIZERCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FERTILIZER APPLICATION SCHEDULE TO OWNER, AS APPLICABLE TO SOIL TYPE, PLANT INSTALLATION TYPE, ANDSITE'S PROPOSED USE. SUGGESTED FERTILIZER TYPES SHALL BE ORGANIC OR OTHERWISE NATURALLY-DERIVED.* FERTILIZER RESTRICTIONS MAY APPLY - REFER TO PROPERTY'S JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY.H. MULCH1. MULCH MATERIAL SHALL BE MOISTENED AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION TO PREVENT WIND DISPLACEMENT, AND APPLIED AT A DEPTH OF THREE(3) INCHES. CLEAR MULCH FROM EACH PLANT'S CROWN (BASE). MULCH SHALL BE "FLORIMULCH," EUCALYPTUS MULCH, OR SIMILARSUSTAINABLY HARVESTED MULCH UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE.2. PROVIDE A THREE (3) INCH MINIMUM LAYER OF SPECIFIED MULCH OVER THE ENTIRE AREA OF EACH SHRUB BED, GROUND COVER, VINE BED,AND TREE PIT (6' MINIMUM) PLANTED UNDER THIS CONTRACT.I. DIGGING AND HANDLING1. PROTECT ROOTS OR ROOT BALLS OF PLANTS AT ALL TIMES FROM SUN, DRYING WINDS, WATER AND FREEZING, AS NECESSARY UNTIL PLANTING.PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE ADEQUATELY PACKED TO PREVENT DAMAGE DURING TRANSIT. TREES TRANSPORTED MORE THAN TEN (10) MILESOR WHICH ARE NOT PLANTED WITHIN THREE (3) DAYS OF DELIVERY TO THE SITE SHALL BE SPRAYED WITH AN ANTITRANSPIRANT PRODUCT("WILTPRUF" OR EQUAL) TO MINIMIZE TRANSPIRATIONAL WATER LOSS.2. BALLED AND BURLAPPED (B&B), AND FIELD GROWN (FG) PLANTS SHALL BE DUG WITH FIRM, NATURAL BALLS OF SOIL OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TOENCOMPASS THE FIBROUS AND FEEDING ROOTS OF THE PLANTS. NO PLANTS MOVED WITH A ROOT BALL SHALL BE PLANTED IF THE BALL ISCRACKED OR BROKEN. PLANTS SHALL NOT BE HANDLED BY STEMS.3. PLANTS MARKED "BR" IN THE PLANT LIST SHALL BE DUG WITH BARE ROOTS. CARE SHALL BE EXERCISED THAT THE ROOTS DO NOT DRY OUTDURING TRANSPORTATION AND PRIOR TO PLANTING.4. PROTECTION OF PALMS: ONLY A MINIMUM OF FRONDS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE CROWN OF THE PALM TREES TO FACILITATE MOVING ANDHANDLING. CLEAR TRUNK (CT) SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED AFTER THE MINIMUM OF FRONDS HAVE BEEN REMOVED. ALL PALMS SHALL BE BRACEDPER PALM PLANTING DETAIL.5. EXCAVATION OF TREE PITS SHALL BE PERFORMED USING EXTREME CARE TO AVOID DAMAGE TO SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE ELEMENTS SUCHAS UTILITIES OR HARDSCAPE ELEMENTS, FOOTERS AND PREPARED SUB-BASES.J. CONTAINER GROWN STOCK1. ALL CONTAINER GROWN MATERIAL SHALL BE HEALTHY, VIGOROUS, WELL-ROOTED PLANTS ESTABLISHED IN THE CONTAINER IN WHICH THEYARE SOLD. THE PLANTS SHALL HAVE TOPS WHICH ARE OF GOOD QUALITY AND ARE IN A HEALTHY GROWING CONDITION.2. AN ESTABLISHED CONTAINER GROWN PLANT SHALL BE TRANSPLANTED INTO A CONTAINER AND GROWN IN THAT CONTAINER SUFFICIENTLYLONG ENOUGH FOR THE NEW FIBROUS ROOTS TO HAVE DEVELOPED SO THAT THE ROOT MASS WILL RETAIN ITS SHAPE AND HOLD TOGETHERWHEN REMOVED FROM THE CONTAINER. CONTAINER GROWN STOCK SHALL NOT BE HANDLED BY THEIR STEMS.3. ROOT BOUND PLANTS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE AND WILL BE REJECTED.4. RPG= "ROOTS PLUS GROWER" CONTAINER PRODUCTS SHALL BE USED WHERE SPECIFIED.K. COLLECTED STOCKWHEN THE USE OF COLLECTED STOCK IS PERMITTED AS INDICATED BY THE OWNER OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE, THE MINIMUM SIZES OFROOTBALLS SHALL BE EQUAL TO THAT SPECIFIED FOR THE NEXT LARGER SIZE OF NURSERY GROWN STOCK OF THE SAME VARIETY.L. NATIVE STOCKPLANTS COLLECTED FROM WILD OR NATIVE STANDS SHALL BE CONSIDERED NURSERY GROWN WHEN THEY HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFULLYRE-ESTABLISHED IN A NURSERY ROW AND GROWN UNDER REGULAR NURSERY CULTURAL PRACTICES FOR A MINIMUM OF TWO (2) GROWINGSEASONS AND HAVE ATTAINED ADEQUATE ROOT AND TOP GROWTH TO INDICATE FULL RECOVERY FROM TRANSPLANTING INTO THE NURSERY ROW.M. MATERIALS LISTQUANTITIES NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE FURNISHED BY THE CONTRACTOR. QUANTITY ESTIMATES HAVEBEEN MADE CAREFULLY, BUT THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR OWNER ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORS. SHOULD ADISCREPANCY OCCUR BETWEEN THE PLANS AND THE PLANT LIST QUANTITY, THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE NOTIFIED FORCLARIFICATION PRIOR TO BIDDING OR INSTALLATION. ALL DIMENSIONS AND/OR SIZES SPECIFIED SHALL BE THE MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE SIZE.N. FINE GRADING1. FINE GRADING UNDER THIS CONTRACT SHALL CONSIST OF FINAL FINISHED GRADING OF LAWN AND PLANTING AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN ROUGHGRADED BY OTHERS. BERMING AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR, UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED.2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FINE GRADE THE LAWN AND PLANTING AREAS TO BRING THE ROUGH GRADE UP TO FINAL FINISHED GRADE ALLOWINGFOR THICKNESS OF SOD AND/OR MULCH DEPTH. CONTRACTOR SHALL FINE GRADE BY HAND AND/OR WITH ALL EQUIPMENT NECESSARYINCLUDING A GRADING TRACTOR WITH FRONT-END LOADER FOR TRANSPORTING SOIL WITHIN THE SITE.3. ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE GRADED AND MAINTAINED FOR POSITIVE DRAINAGE TO SURFACE/SUBSURFACE STORM DRAIN SYSTEMS. AREASADJACENT TO BUILDINGS SHALL SLOPE AWAY FROM THE BUILDINGS. REFER TO CIVIL ENGINEER'S PLANS FOR FINAL GRADES, IF APPLICABLE.O. PLANTING PROCEDURES1. CLEANING UP BEFORE COMMENCING WORK: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAN WORK AND SURROUNDING AREAS OF ALL RUBBISH OROBJECTIONABLE MATTER DAILY. ALL MORTAR, CEMENT, AND TOXIC MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SURFACE OF ALL PLANT BEDS.THESE MATERIALS SHALL NOT BE MIXED WITH THE SOIL. SHOULD THE CONTRACTOR FIND SUCH SOIL CONDITIONS BENEATH THE SOIL WHICHWILL IN ANY WAY ADVERSELY AFFECT THE PLANT GROWTH, HE SHALL IMMEDIATELY CALL IT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER'SREPRESENTATIVE. FAILURE TO DO SO BEFORE PLANTING SHALL MAKE THE CORRECTIVE MEASURES THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR.2. VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES, CONDUITS, SUPPLY LINES AND CABLES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: ELECTRIC, GAS (LINES ANDTANKS), WATER, SANITARY SEWER, STORMWATER SYSTEMS, CABLE, AND TELEPHONE. PROPERLY MAINTAIN AND PROTECT EXISTING UTILITIES.CALL SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA, INC. (811) TO LOCATE UTILITIES AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.3. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION: CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO REMOVE ALL EXISTING AND IMPORTED LIMEROCK AND LIMEROCK SUB-BASE FROMALL LANDSCAPE PLANTING AREAS TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 36" OR TO NATIVE SOIL. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO BACKFILL THESEPLANTING AREAS TO ROUGH FINISHED GRADE WITH CLEAN TOPSOIL FROM AN ON-SITE SOURCE OR AN IMPORTED SOURCE. IF LIMEROCK OROTHER ADVERSE CONDITIONS OCCUR IN PLANTED AREAS AFTER 36" DEEP EXCAVATION BY THE CONTRACTOR, AND POSITIVE DRAINAGE CANNOT BE ACHIEVED, CONTRACTOR SHALL UTILIZE POOR DRAINAGE CONDITION PLANTING DETAIL.4. FURNISH NURSERY'S CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS AS SPECIFIED HEREIN. INSPECT AND SELECT PLANT MATERIALSBEFORE PLANTS ARE DUG AT NURSERY OR GROWING SITE.5. COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, COUNTY, AND LOCAL REGULATIONS GOVERNING LANDSCAPE MATERIALS AND WORK. CONFORM TOACCEPTED HORTICULTURAL PRACTICES AS USED IN THE TRADE. UPON ARRIVAL AT THE SITE, PLANTS SHALL BE THOROUGHLY WATERED ANDPROPERLY MAINTAINED UNTIL PLANTED. PLANTS STORED ONSITE SHALL NOT REMAIN UNPLANTED OR APPROPRIATELY HEALED IN FOR APERIOD EXCEEDING TWENTY-FOUR (24) HOURS. AT ALL TIMES WORKMANLIKE METHODS CUSTOMARY IN GOOD HORTICULTURAL PRACTICESSHALL BE EXERCISED.6. THE WORK SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH OTHER TRADES TO PREVENT CONFLICTS. COORDINATE PLANTING WITH IRRIGATION WORK TOASSURE AVAILABILITY OF WATER AND PROPER LOCATION OF IRRIGATION APPURTENANCES AND PLANTS.7. ALL PLANTING PITS SHALL BE EXCAVATED TO SIZE AND DEPTH IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE USA STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK 260.1, UNLESSSHOWN OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS, AND BACK FILLED WITH THE PREPARED PLANTING SOIL MIXTURE AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION E. TEST ALLTREE PITS WITH WATER BEFORE PLANTING TO ASSURE PROPER DRAINAGE PERCOLATION IS AVAILABLE. NO ALLOWANCE WILL BE MADE FORLOST PLANTS DUE TO IMPROPER DRAINAGE. IF POOR DRAINAGE EXISTS, UTILIZE "POOR DRAINAGE CONDITION" PLANTING DETAIL. TREES SHALLBE SET PLUMB AND HELD IN POSITION UNTIL THE PLANTING MIXTURE HAS BEEN FLUSHED INTO PLACE WITH A SLOW, FULL HOSE STREAM. ALLPLANTING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY PERSONNEL FAMILIAR WITH PLANTING PROCEDURES AND UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF A QUALIFIEDLANDSCAPE FOREMAN. PROPER "JETTING IN" SHALL BE ASSURED TO ELIMINATE AIR POCKETS AROUND THE ROOTS. "JET STICK" OR EQUAL ISRECOMMENDED.8. TAKE ALL NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO AVOID DAMAGE TO BUILDINGS AND BUILDING STRUCTURES WHILE INSTALLING TREES.9. SOIL MIXTURE SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION E OF THESE SPECIFICATIONS.10. TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL BE SET STRAIGHT AT AN ELEVATION THAT, AFTER SETTLEMENT, THE PLANT CROWN WILL STAND ONE (1) TO TWO (2)INCHES ABOVE GRADE. EACH PLANT SHALL BE SET IN THE CENTER OF THE PIT. PLANTING SOIL MIXTURE SHALL BE BACK FILLED, THOROUGHLYTAMPED AROUND THE BALL, AND SETTLED BY WATER (AFTER TAMPING).11. AMEND PINE AND OAK PLANT PITS WITH ECTOMYCORRHIZAL SOIL APPLICATION PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION. ALL OTHER PLANTPITS SHALL BE AMENDED WITH ENDOMYCORRHIZAL SOIL APPLICATION PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION. PROVIDE PRODUCTINFORMATION SUBMITTAL PRIOR TO INOCULATION.12. FILL HOLE WITH SOIL MIXTURE, MAKING CERTAIN ALL SOIL IS SATURATED. TO DO THIS, FILL HOLE WITH WATER AND ALLOW TO SOAK MINIMUMTWENTY (20) MINUTES, STIRRING IF NECESSARY TO GET SOIL THOROUGHLY WET. PACK LIGHTLY WITH FEET, ADD MORE WET SOIL MIXTURE. DONOT COVER TOP OF BALL WITH SOIL MIXTURE. ALL BURLAP, ROPE, WIRES, BASKETS, ETC.., SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SIDES AND TOPS OFBALLS, BUT NO BURLAP SHALL BE PULLED FROM UNDERNEATH.13. TREES SHALL BE PRUNED, AT THE DIRECTION OF THE OWNER OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE, TO PRESERVE THE NATURAL CHARACTER OF THEPLANT. ALL SOFT WOOD OR SUCKER GROWTH AND ALL BROKEN OR BADLY DAMAGED BRANCHES SHALL BE REMOVED WITH A CLEAN CUT. ALLPRUNING TO BE PERFORMED BY CERTIFIED ARBORIST, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI A-300.14. SHRUBS AND GROUND COVER PLANTS SHALL BE EVENLY SPACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DRAWINGS AND AS INDICATED ON THE PLANT LIST.MATERIALS INSTALLED SHALL MEET MINIMUM SPECIMEN REQUIREMENTS OR QUANTITIES SHOW ON PLANS, WHICHEVER IS GREATER. CULTIVATEALL PLANTING AREAS TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6", REMOVE AND DISPOSE ALL DEBRIS. MIX TOP 4" THE PLANTING SOIL MIXTURE AS SPECIFIED INSECTION E. THOROUGHLY WATER ALL PLANTS AFTER INSTALLATION.15. TREE GUYING AND BRACING SHALL BE INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS TO INSURE STABILITY AND MAINTAINTREES IN AN UPRIGHT POSITION. IF THE CONTRACTOR AND OWNER DECIDE TO WAIVE THE TREE GUYING AND BRACING, THE OWNER SHALLNOTIFY THE PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN WRITING AND AGREE TO INDEMNIFY AND HOLD HARMLESS THE PROJECT LANDSCAPEARCHITECT IN THE EVENT UNSUPPORTED TREES PLANTED UNDER THIS CONTRACT FALL AND DAMAGE PERSON OR PROPERTY.16. ALL PLANT BEDS SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF NOXIOUS WEEDS UNTIL FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF WORK. IF DIRECTED BY THE OWNER, "ROUND-UP"SHALL BE APPLIED FOR WEED CONTROL BY QUALIFIED PERSONNEL TO ALL PLANTING AREAS IN SPOT APPLICATIONS PER MANUFACTURER'SPRECAUTIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS. PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION, TREAT ALL PLANTING BEDS WITH AN APPROVED PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDEAT AN APPLICATION RATE RECOMMENDED BY THE MANUFACTURER. (AS ALLOWED BY JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY)P. LAWN SODDING1. THE WORK CONSISTS OF LAWN BED PREPARATION, SOIL PREPARATION, AND SODDING COMPLETE, IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THESPECIFICATIONS AND THE APPLICABLE DRAWINGS TO PRODUCE A TURF GRASS LAWN ACCEPTABLE TO THE OWNER.2. ALL AREAS THAT ARE TO BE SODDED SHALL BE CLEARED OF ANY ROUGH GRASS, WEEDS, AND DEBRIS BY MEANS OF A SOD CUTTER TO A DEPTHOF THREE (3) INCHES, AND THE GROUND BROUGHT TO AN EVEN GRADE. THE ENTIRE SURFACE SHALL BE ROLLED WITH A ROLLER WEIGHING NOTMORE THAN ONE-HUNDRED (100) POUNDS PER FOOT OF WIDTH. DURING THE ROLLING, ALL DEPRESSIONS CAUSED BY SETTLEMENT SHALL BEFILLED WITH ADDITIONAL SOIL, AND THE SURFACE SHALL BE REGRADED AND ROLLED UNTIL PRESENTING A SMOOTH AND EVEN FINISH TO THEREQUIRED GRADE.3. PREPARE LOOSE BED FOUR (4) INCHES DEEP. HAND RAKE UNTIL ALL BUMPS AND DEPRESSIONS ARE REMOVED. WET PREPARED AREATHOROUGHLY.4. SODDINGa. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SOD ALL AREAS THAT ARE NOT PAVED OR PLANTED AS DESIGNATED ON THE DRAWINGS WITHIN THE CONTRACTLIMITS, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED OTHERWISE.b. THE SOD SHALL BE CERTIFIED TO MEET FLORIDA STATE PLANT BOARD SPECIFICATIONS, ABSOLUTELY TRUE TO VARIETAL TYPE, AND FREE FROMWEEDS, FUNGUS, INSECTS AND DISEASE OF ANY KIND.c. SOD PANELS SHALL BE LAID TIGHTLY TOGETHER SO AS TO MAKE A SOLID SODDED LAWN AREA. SOD SHALL BE LAID UNIFORMLY AGAINST THEEDGES OF ALL CURBS AND OTHER HARDSCAPE ELEMENTS, PAVED AND PLANTED AREAS. ADJACENT TO BUILDINGS, A 24 INCH STONE MULCHSTRIP SHALL BE PROVIDED. IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING SOD LAYING, THE LAWN AREAS SHALL BE ROLLED WITH A LAWN ROLLER CUSTOMARILYUSED FOR SUCH PURPOSES, AND THEN THOROUGHLY IRRIGATED. IF, IN THE OPINION OF THE OWNER, TOP-DRESSING IS NECESSARY AFTERROLLING TO FILL THE VOIDS BETWEEN THE SOD PANELS AND TO EVEN OUT INCONSISTENCIES IN THE SOD, CLEAN SAND, AS APPROVED BY THEOWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE, SHALL BE UNIFORMLY SPREAD OVER THE ENTIRE SURFACE OF THE SOD AND THOROUGHLY WATERED IN. FERTILIZEINSTALLED SOD AS ALLOWED BY PROPERTY'S JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY.5. DURING DELIVERY, PRIOR TO, AND DURING THE PLANTING OF THE LAWN AREAS, THE SOD PANELS SHALL AT ALL TIMES BE PROTECTED FROMEXCESSIVE DRYING AND UNNECESSARY EXPOSURE OF THE ROOTS TO THE SUN. ALL SOD SHALL BE STACKED SO AS NOT TO BE DAMAGED BYSWEATING OR EXCESSIVE HEAT AND MOISTURE.6. LAWN MAINTENANCEa. WITHIN THE CONTRACT LIMITS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PRODUCE A DENSE, WELL ESTABLISHED LAWN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BERESPONSIBLE FOR THE REPAIR AND RE-SODDING OF ALL ERODED, SUNKEN OR BARE SPOTS (LARGER THAN 12"X12") UNTIL CERTIFICATION OFACCEPTANCE BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. REPAIRED SODDING SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED AS IN THE ORIGINAL WORK (INCLUDINGREGRADING IF NECESSARY).b. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR ESTABLISHING AND MAINTAINING SOD/LAWN UNTIL ACCEPTANCE BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. PRIORTO AND UPON ACCEPTANCE, CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE WATERING/IRRIGATION SCHEDULE TO OWNER. OBSERVE ALL APPLICABLE WATERINGRESTRICTIONS AS SET FORTH BY THE PROPERTY'S JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY.Q. CLEANUPUPON COMPLETION OF ALL PLANTING WORK AND BEFORE FINAL ACCEPTANCE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, ANDDEBRIS RESULTING FROM HIS WORK. ALL PAVED AREAS SHALL BE CLEANED AND THE SITE LEFT IN A NEAT AND ACCEPTABLE CONDITION ASAPPROVED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE.R. PLANT MATERIAL MAINTENANCEALL PLANTS AND PLANTING INCLUDED UNDER THIS CONTRACT SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY WATERING, CULTIVATING, SPRAYING, AND ALL OTHEROPERATIONS (SUCH AS RE-STAKING OR REPAIRING GUY SUPPORTS) NECESSARY TO INSURE A HEALTHY PLANT CONDITION BY THE CONTRACTORUNTIL CERTIFICATION OF ACCEPTANCE BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE.S. FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF WORKFINAL INSPECTION AT THE END OF THE WARRANTY PERIOD SHALL BE ON PLANTING, CONSTRUCTION AND ALL OTHER INCIDENTAL WORK PERTAININGTO THIS CONTRACT. ANY REPLACEMENT AT THIS TIME SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE SAME ONE (1) YEAR WARRANTY (OR AS SPECIFIED BY THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR OWNER IN WRITING) BEGINNING WITH THE TIME OF REPLACEMENT AND ENDING WITH THE SAME INSPECTION ANDACCEPTANCE HEREIN DESCRIBED.T. WARRANTY1. THE LIFE AND SATISFACTORY CONDITION OF ALL PLANT MATERIAL INSTALLED (INCLUDING SOD) BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BEWARRANTED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) CALENDAR YEAR COMMENCING AT THE TIME OF CERTIFICATION OF ACCEPTANCEBY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE.2. ANY PLANT NOT FOUND IN A HEALTHY GROWING CONDITION AT THE END OF THE WARRANTY PERIOD SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE ANDREPLACED AS SOON AS WEATHER CONDITIONS PERMIT. ALL REPLACEMENTS SHALL BE PLANTS OF THE SAME KIND AND SIZE AS SPECIFIED INTHE PLANT LIST. THEY SHALL BE FURNISHED PLANTED AND MULCHED AS SPECIFIED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.3. IN THE EVENT THE OWNER DOES NOT CONTRACT WITH THE CONTRACTOR FOR LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE, THE CONTRACTORSHOULD VISIT THE PROJECT SITE PERIODICALLY DURING THE ONE (1) YEAR WARRANTY PERIOD TO EVALUATE MAINTENANCE PROCEDURESBEING PERFORMED BY THE OWNER. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER IN WRITING OF MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES OR CONDITIONSWHICH THREATEN VIGOROUS AND HEALTHY PLANT GROWTH. SITE VISITS SHALL BE CONDUCTED A MINIMUM OF ONCE PER MONTH FOR APERIOD OF TWELVE (12) MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE.GENERAL LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS AND NOTES1L1.51139 PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM 401 PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY AGENDA | NOVEMBER 4, 2020 REGULAR MEETING TITLE Chau Medical Center – Final Engineering/Site Plan Approval, Aesthetic Plan Approval for the Medical Office, Specimen Tree Removal, certain Waivers from the City Code, and Development Agreement. SUMMARY The Community Development Department requests that the Planning and Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency hold a Public Hearing to consider Final Engineering/Site Plan Approval, Aesthetic Plan Approval for the Medical Office, Specimen Tree Removal, certain Waivers from the City Code, and Development Agreement in order to construct a Medical Office, Assisted Living Facility, and Retail building on the Property in a phased development. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency forward a recommendation of approval to the City Commission for Final Engineering/Site Plan Approval, Aesthetic Plan Approval for the Medical Office, Specimen Tree Removal, certain Waivers from the City Code, and Development Agreement in order to construct a Medical Office, Assisted Living Facility, and Retail building on the Property in a phased development. 140 TITLE Chau Medical Center – Aesthetic Plan Review, certain Waivers, Final Engineering Review, Specimen Tree Removal, and Development Agreement. SUMMARY The Community Development Department requests that the Planning and Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency hold a Public Hearing to consider Final Engineering/Site Plan Approval, Aesthetic Plan Approval for the Medical Offlce, Specimen Tree Removal, certain Waivers from the City Code, and Development Agreement in order to construct a Medical Offlce, Assisted Living Facility, and Retail building on the Property in a phased development. General Information Applicant Chau Family Holdings III, LLC (Dr. Son Chau) Property Owner(s) Chau Family Holdings III, LLC Location West of the intersection of Hacienda Drive and S.R. 434 Tract Size ±5.08 Gross Acres (Vacant) Parcel ID Number 34-20-30-5AW-0000-048A Zoning Designation Neighborhood Commercial Districts (C-1) S.R. 434 Corridor Overlay District FLUM Designation Commercial Adjacent Land Use North: East S.R. 434 / ROW East: Commercial (Vacant) South: Hacienda Village (MDR) West: Hacienda Drive / ROW S.R. 434 Frontage Minimum 25 feet Maximum 100-feet Height C-1: Up to 50 feet S.R. 434: Up to *Five stories (*Limited to three-stories per the Development Agreement) Setbacks (C-1) Front: 25 ft. Rear: 15 ft. Side: 15 ft. _______ PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM 40 1 PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2020 | REGULAR MEETING 141 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M 4 0 1 | W E D N E S D A Y , N O V E M B E R 4 , 2 0 2 0 | P A G E 2 O F 22 Development Standards Lot Coverage: 75% Development Permits Waiver | Pending Development Agreement Development Agreement | Pending Code Enforcement Not applicable City Liens Not applicable Background Data: The Community Development Department received an application from Chau Family Holdings III, LLC to construct a multi-phased development. The Chau Medical Center is the flrst development area proposed for construction on the ±5.08 acre site. Development Area 1, The Chau Medical Center includes a 10,190 SF structure on ±1.22 acres. This part of the development phase includes; mass grading of the entire site, master stormwater and utilities infrastructure, perimeter landscaping, and a wall located on south side of the property. Proposed future development areas will include; Development Area 2, a retail component including a 6,400 SF structure on ±1.5 acres, and Development Area 3, an Assisted Living Facility (ALF) with 114-beds a 49,380 SF structure on ±1.34 acres. The Applicant shall complete Aesthetic Review of each building, obtain building permits, and substantially commence vertical construction, which shall at minimum include building foundations, of all buildings in Phases Two and Three within three (3) years of receiving certiflcates of occupancy for Phase One. The entire site is master planned to facilitate the future development areas and related permitting. The total gross area for all proposed buildings is 65,970 SF. Notices were mailed to all owners of real property adjacent to and within approximately flve-hundred feet (500) of the subject property and all Homeowner’s Associations on flle with the City Winter Springs (215 notices). A Community Workshop was held on August 13, 2019 approximately 50 persons were in attendance and there were no objections regarding the proposed use. 142 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M 4 0 1 | W E D N E S D A Y , N O V E M B E R 4 , 2 0 2 0 | P A G E 3 OF 22 Final Engineering Plans Criteria, Sec. 20-33.1: (a) Site and flnal engineering plans and the subdivision of land shall also be subject to the technical requirements set forth in Chapter 9 of the City Code. It is the intent of this section to apply to applications for site and flnal engineering plans and to any subdivision of land requiring a plat, if applicable, and does not include review and approval of a lot split application. Please see discussion below regarding technical requirements of Chapter 9. The Final Engineering Plans have been reviewed by the City’s contract engineer, concluding that the Plans satisfy the technical requirements provided the conditions of approval set forth below are met. (b) Except in situations involving one (1) single-family home, the planning and zoning board shall be required to review all site and flnal engineering plan and subdivision of land applications and make a written recommendation to the city commission. Such recommendation shall include the reasons for the board's recommendation and show the board has considered the applicable criteria set forth in this section. (c) Upon receipt of the planning and zoning board's recommendation, the city commission shall make a flnal decision on the application. If the city commission determines that the planning and zoning board has not made a recommendation on an application within a reasonable period of time, the city commission may, at its discretion, consider an application without the planning and zoning board's recommendation. (d) Except in situations involving one (1) single-family home, all site and flnal engineering plan and subdivision recommendations and flnal decisions shall be based on whether the site and flnal engineering plan and subdivision of land complies with all the technical requirements set forth in chapter 9 of the City Code and the following criteria to the extent applicable: (1) Whether the applicant has demonstrated the site and flnal engineering plan and subdivision of land, including its proposed density, height, scale and intensity, hours of operation, building and lighting design, setbacks, buffers, noise, refuse, odor, particulates, smoke, fumes and other emissions, parking and trafflc- generating characteristics, number of persons anticipated using, residing or working under the plan, and other off-site impacts, is compatible and harmonious with adjacent land uses, and will not adversely impact land use activities in the immediate vicinity. 143 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M 4 0 1 | W E D N E S D A Y , N O V E M B E R 4 , 2 0 2 0 | P A G E 4 OF 22 Analysis: The proposed scale and intensity of the structure as depicted in the Final Engineering Plans is consistent with previously approved developments along the S.R. 434. The proposed daily hours of operation are as follows; the Chau Medical Center will be open from 9:00 a.m. until 3:00 p.m. Monday through Thursday, and 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. on Fridays. The proposed ALF’s hours will require employees to be able to enter and leave the facility twenty-four (24) hours a day seven (7) days a week. . Limited retail uses allowed on the site are already determined and in turn the scale and intensity of the permitted uses will not adversely impact land in the vicinity. Impacts related to noise, refuse, odor, particulates, smoke, fumes and other emissions are anticipated to be negligible given the nature of the project. Parking and transportation are addressed thoroughly below. The development is compatible and harmonious with adjacent land uses and will not adversely impact land use activities in the immediate vicinity. (2) Whether the applicant has demonstrated the size and shape of the site, the proposed access and internal circulation, and the design enhancements to be adequate to accommodate the proposed density, scale and intensity of the site and flnal engineering plan requested. The site shall be of sufflcient size to accommodate design amenities such as screening, buffers, landscaping, open space, off-street parking, safe and convenient automobile, bicycle, and pedestrian mobility at the site, and other similar site plan improvements needed to mitigate against potential adverse impacts of the proposed use. Analysis: The size and shape of the site, the proposed access and internal circulation, and the design enhancements are adequate to accommodate the proposed development. Access to the site will be provided via a full access driveway opposite Sherry Avenue and a right-in/right-out driveway on S.R. 434. Site access was reviewed and approved by Seminole County Fire. The existing and future street network provides multiple options for residents to reach their desired destinations. As mentioned above, the Applicant is requesting a waiver from Winter Springs City Code Sec. 20-605(b), which will alter the width and type of plantings required in each component part of the streetscape. However, the site is large enough to accommodate the required total 27-foot streetscape. The waivers are related to accommodating existing overhead power lines and underground utilities and not related to lack of space on the property. The on-site improvements include landscaping buffers, streetscape, landscape screening for the trash receptacle, bicycle parking, and pedestrian paths to mitigate against potential adverse impacts of the proposed uses. Transportation and parking elements are discussed below. 144 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M 4 0 1 | W E D N E S D A Y , N O V E M B E R 4 , 2 0 2 0 | P A G E 5 OF 22 (3) Whether the proposed site and flnal engineering plan and subdivision of land will have an adverse impact on the local economy, including governmental flscal impact, employment, and property values. Analysis: The proposed medical offlce, ALF, and retail developments are permitted uses within the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial District and the S.R. 434 Corridor Overlay District. The development is not expected to have an adverse impact on the local economy, but to add to the economy. The medical offlce is expected to generate 50 new direct jobs. The ALF and retail use are proposed to also add 50 indirect jobs, such as landscapers, construction workers, etc., during the construction of the buildings. The development will also provide ad valorem taxes to the City of Winter Springs. (4) Whether the proposed site and flnal engineering plan and subdivision of land will have an adverse impact on the natural environment, including air, water, and noise pollution, vegetation and wildlife, open space, noxious and desirable vegetation, and fiood hazards. Analysis: The Applicant contracted with Terracon for the Geo Technical Report and Bio-Tech Consulting, Inc. for the Environmental Report. The reports did not identify adverse impacts on the natural environment. The total gross area for all proposed buildings is 65,970 SF and the maximum impervious cover proposed for the site is 48.67%, the maximum impervious cover allowed is 75%. The Applicant is maintaining an ample amount of open space on-site by not building up to the maximum allowed impervious of 75%. At this time, a noise study to analyze proposed noise levels for a medical offlce (Development Area 1) is not required by the City, as the hours of operation are daytime hours and will emit low noise levels. The ALF (Development Area 3) also will emit low noise levels, as this use will provide services for elder care communities, home care providers, families and businesses who tend to serve older adults. The City Engineer has determined that the site is not located within a fiood plain, the proposed building/lot lies in Zone “X,” based on Flood Insurance Rate Map No. 121170160F, Community No. 120295, City of Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida. According to the FIRM panel legend – Zone X is for areas that are determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance fioodplain. The stormwater collection system and retention pond are designed to meet the SJRWMD and City of Winter Springs criteria for storm event attenuation and treatment. The pond overfiows into Hacienda Drive and into the open grate of the existing stormwater collection system and ultimately discharges into Gee Creek and Lake Jesup. 145 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M 4 0 1 | W E D N E S D A Y , N O V E M B E R 4 , 2 0 2 0 | P A G E 6 OF 22 The Applicant has requested the removal of two out of four specimen trees located on the subject site. The request is addressed separately below. The Applicant desires to remove 1,228 credits of trees and proposes to preserve 90 credits worth of trees, requiring the replacement of 1,138 credits of trees. Development Area I will include the 769 credits and the remaining 150 credits will be planted during future Development Area 2 and Development Area 3. The outstanding balance owned to the City shall be 219 credits, which cannot be replaced onsite. Therefore, in accordance with Ordinance 03-2020, a $65,700 tree bank mitigation payment will be required from the applicant. (5) Whether the proposed site and flnal engineering plan and subdivision of land will have an adverse impact on historic, scenic, and cultural resources, including views and vistas, and loss or degradation of cultural and historic resources. Analysis: It is not anticipated that the proposed development will have an adverse impact on any historic, scenic, or cultural resources, including views and vistas, and loss or degradation of cultural and historic resources. (6) Whether the proposed site and flnal engineering plan and subdivision of land will have an adverse impact on public services, including water, sewer, stormwater and surface water management, police, flre, parks and recreation, streets, public transportation, marina and waterways, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Analysis: See below for discussion regarding impact on public services. (7) Whether the site and flnal engineering plan and subdivision of land, and related trafflc report and plan provided by the applicant, details safe and efflcient means of ingress and egress into and out of the neighborhood and adequately addresses the impact of projected trafflc on the immediate neighborhood, trafflc circulation pattern for the neighborhood, and trafflc fiow through immediate intersections and arterials. Analysis: See below for discussion regarding impact on regarding trafflc circulation. (8) Whether the proposed site and flnal engineering plan and subdivision of land will have an adverse impact on housing and social conditions, including variety of housing unit types and prices, and neighborhood quality. 146 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M 4 0 1 | W E D N E S D A Y , N O V E M B E R 4 , 2 0 2 0 | P A G E 7 OF 22 Analysis: The proposed development is not anticipated to have an adverse impact on housing and social conditions, as the proposed uses include a medical offlce, ALF, and retail use. (9) Whether the proposed site and flnal engineering plan and subdivision of land avoids signiflcant adverse odor, emission, noise, glare, and vibration impacts on adjacent and surrounding lands regarding refuse collection, service delivery, parking and loading, signs, lighting, and other sire elements. Analysis: It anticipated that the proposed development will not emit odors, noise, glares, or vibrations that will adversely impact adjacent property. There is adequate shared parking, lighting, and refuse collection, within the development. (10) Whether the applicant has provided an acceptable security plan for the proposed establishment to be located on the site and flnal engineering plan and subdivision of land that addresses the safety and security needs of the establishment and its users and employees and minimizes impacts on the neighborhood, if applicable. Analysis: The Applicant has indicated that alarm systems will be installed inside the medical offlce. In addition, there will be a Security guard on-site after the future ALF is developed. Security measures will be in place and discussed for the future development of the future retail component. (11) Whether the applicant has provided on the site and flnal engineering plan and subdivision of land an acceptable plan for the mass delivery of merchandise for new large footprint buildings (greater than twenty thousand (20,000) square feet) including the hours of operation for delivery trucks to come into and exit the property and surrounding neighborhood, if applicable. Analysis: Not applicable. (12) Whether the applicant has demonstrated that the site and flnal engineering plan and subdivision of land have been designed to incorporate mitigative techniques and plans needed to prevent adverse impacts addressed in the criteria stated herein or to adjacent and surrounding uses and properties. Analysis: The Final Engineering Plans, in conjunction with the Development Agreement, prevent adverse impacts. Primarily, the Development Agreement and Plans include enhanced streetscape along S.R. 434 to and ensure the passage of open space to the development. 147 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M 4 0 1 | W E D N E S D A Y , N O V E M B E R 4 , 2 0 2 0 | P A G E 8 OF 22 (13) Whether the applicant has agreed to execute a binding development agreement required by city to incorporate the terms and conditions of approval deemed necessary by the city commission including, but not limited to, any mitigative techniques and plans required by City Code. Analysis: The Applicant has agreed to execute a binding Development Agreement and it is attached hereto as an Exhibit. Proposed Layout: The Final Engineering Plan proposes a medical offlce consisting of one three-story building The Final Engineering Plan for the site proposes to construct a multi- phased development starting with Development Area 1, which includes a three- story (maximum) Medical Offlce Building (10,190 SF) (Area 1) on ±1.22 acres, mass grading of the entire site, master stormwater, utilities infrastructure, perimeter landscaping, and a wall on south side. Proposed future developments will include Development Area 2, a three-story (maximum) Retail Center (6,400 SF) (Area 2) on ±1.25 acres and Development Area 3 a three-story (maximum) Assisted Living Facility, 114-beds (49,380 SF) on ±1.34 acres. Site Amenities: The master stormwater pond is a multi-use amenity which provides a fountain and walking trail thus enhancing aesthetic value to the site and the surrounding community. Water and Sewer: Water service is available from the City’s eight (8) inch water main in the S.R. 434 right-of-way. The development is connecting to the City’s sanitary sewer collection system in Hacienda Drive. The City’s water and wastewater systems and treatment plants have capacity to serve this commercial development. Stormwater: The Chau Medical Center will have its own onsite stormwater collection system and retention pond which will overfiow to the stormwater collection system located within Hacienda Drive. 148 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M 4 0 1 | W E D N E S D A Y , N O V E M B E R 4 , 2 0 2 0 | P A G E 9 OF 22 Transportation: The Chau Medical Center trafflc analysis was performed to assess the impact of a proposed mixed-use development in the City of Winter Springs. Located on S.R. 434 approximately 1,500 feet east of Moss Avenue, the proposed development will consist of a 10,190 SF medical offlce building, a 6,400 SF retail building and an assisted living facility with 114 beds. Access to the site will be provided via a full access driveway opposite Sherry Avenue and a right-in/right-out driveway on S.R. 434. At the full-access driveway located opposite Sherry Avenue, a westbound left turn lane is proposed to be provided. Projected trafflc conditions for the project buildout were analyzed using daily trafflc volumes for the roadway segments and P.M. peak hour trafflc volumes for the intersections. The projected trafflc volumes used in the analysis consisted of background trafflc volumes plus project trips. Background trafflc volumes were estimated with the use of an annual growth rate of 2.0% or a growth factor. A trends analysis of historical trafflc counts on S.R. 434 revealed annual growth rates ranging from -0.84% to -0.55%. The proposed development will generate a total daily trafflc volume of 1,212 new net daily trips, of which 55 will occur in the A.M. peak hour and 114 will occur P.M. peak hour. The study roadway segments currently operate at adequate Levels of Service and will continue to operate at satisfactory Levels of Service when project trips are added. The study intersections currently operate at satisfactory overall Levels of Service and will continue to do so in the projected conditions except for northbound approach of the proposed driveway opposite Sherry Avenue for the P.M. peak hour. This approach is expected to experience delays due to the stop control, but the volume-to-capacity ratio of this approach is below 1.0 indicating no capacity deflciency. Parking: Development Area 1: Chau Medical Center consists of 10,190 SF of offlce space. Per City Code, LDC Section 9-277(11), this use requires three (3) parking spaces for doctors, there will be four (4) doctors on-site, plus one (1) additional parking space for every two (2) employees with twenty (20) employees, requiring a total of 22 parking spaces, plus one handicapped space. The Applicant is providing a total of forty-seven (47) parking spaces plus three (3) handicapped spaces, for a total of flfty (50) parking spaces. 149 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M 4 0 1 | W E D N E S D A Y , N O V E M B E R 4 , 2 0 2 0 | P A G E 10 OF 22 Development Area 2: Retail; proposes 6,400 SF, per LDC Section 9-277 (27) which requires one (1) parking space for each three hundred (300) square feet of fioor space in the building exclusive of storage space. The required amount of parking spaces is 22 spaces plus one handicapped space. The Applicant is providing a total of forty-nine (49) parking spaces plus one (1) handicapped space for total of flfty (50) parking spaces. Development Area 3: The ALF proposes 114 units, 49,380 SF, per LDC Section 9-277(7), this use requires 1 space per 2 bedrooms. This use requires flfty-seven (57) spaces, including three (3) handicapped spaces. The Applicant is providing a total of twenty-nine (99) parking spaces including (2) handicapped spaces. The Applicant is providing a Cross Access Parking Agreement between Development Areas 1 and 3, so that the required parking is met for both developments. The site has 28 shared parking spaces within 300 feet of the ALF. Analysis: The overall development of the site requires one-hundred and one (101) parking spaces the Applicant is providing one-hundred and twenty-nine (129) parking spaces. At this time the Applicant is not proposing a subdivision of land. Should the parcel be split in the future, a Cross Access Parking Agreement will be required. This will ensure that parking is not a burden on future property owners and businesses. As shown on the Overall Master Site Notes (Sheet C-5A0), the site currently has a surplus of twenty-eight parking spaces. If necessary, parking requirements shall be adjusted based on future uses to safeguard compliance with the City of Winter Springs Land Development Code. Aesthetic Review: Pursuant to Section 9-603, which sets forth guidelines and minimum standards for Aesthetic Review packages, staff has utilized the below criteria in Section 9-603 to determine the following. The attached Aesthetic Review package (Exhibit 2) includes all of the submittal requirements for aesthetic review as set forth in Section 9-600 through 9-607 and include the following: (a) a site plan; (b) elevations illustration all sides of structures facing public streets or spaces; (c) illustrations of all walls, fences, and other accessory structures and the indication of height and their associated materials; (d) elevation of proposed exterior permanent signs or other constructed elements other than habitable space, if any; (e) illustrations of materials, texture, and colors to be used on all buildings, accessory structures, exterior signs; and (f) other architectural and engineering data as may be required. The procedures for review and approval are set forth in Section 9-603. 150 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M 4 0 1 | W E D N E S D A Y , N O V E M B E R 4 , 2 0 2 0 | P A G E 11 OF 22 Aesthetic Review 1. The plans and speciflcations of the proposed project indicate that the setting, landscaping, proportions, materials, colors, texture, scale, unity, balance, rhythm, contrast, and simplicity are coordinated in a harmonious manner relevant to the particular proposal, surrounding area and cultural character of the community. Analysis: The project is located southwest quadrant of East S.R. 434 and Hacienda Drive intersection. The entrance area will be adorned with an 11 ft. landscape and treescape area, a 6-foot sidewalk, and a 10 ft. landscape area for a total of 27 ft. area for planting canopy trees which will line the right-of- way. Perimeter landscaping and a wall will also be included on south side of the property. The streetscaping will be completed in phases, in concert with the future development areas of the site. The master stormwater pond is a multi-use amenity providing a fountain and walking trail enhancing aesthetic value to the site and the surrounding community as a whole. The Medical Offlce includes architecture that is complementary to the diverse styles of architecture on the east side of the City. The neutral complementary color scheme with a variation of straight clean uniform lines is harmonizing to the surrounding area. The Medical Offlce is designed as a feature building that will contain enhanced architectural and aesthetic elements. The site was developed to encourage use by pedestrians, the proposed buildings provide an interconnected system of walkable sidewalks to connect to future phases the site. 2. The plans for the proposed project are in harmony with any future development which has been formally approved by the city within the surrounding area. Analysis: Not applicable. 3. The plans for the proposed project are not excessively similar or dissimilar to any other building, structure or sign which is either fully constructed, permitted but not fully constructed, or included on the same permit application, and facing upon the same or intersecting street within flve hundred (500) feet of the proposed site, with respect to one or more of the following features of exterior design and appearance: a. Front or side elevations; b. Size and arrangement of elevation facing the street, including reverse arrangement; or 151 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M 4 0 1 | W E D N E S D A Y , N O V E M B E R 4 , 2 0 2 0 | P A G E 12 OF 22 c. Other signiflcant features of design such as, but not limited to: materials, roof line, hardscape improvements, and height or design elements. Analysis: The proposed units are designed to contribute to the quality architectural styles that are typical of the surrounding area. This project represents a progressive addition to the City of Winter Springs. Signiflcant design features include architectural design elements such as stucco, brick, plank boards, shingled roofs, and adorned with lighting flxtures on the building. The height of the buildings range from 30 ft. up to 50 ft. tall. Approximately 600 feet across S.R. 434 the subject site Venetian Plaza is currently in the process of a façade renovation. The style depicts similar aesthetic and scale as the proposed medical offlce. 4. The plans for the proposed project are in harmony with, or signiflcantly enhance, the established character of other buildings, structures or signs in the surrounding area with respect to architectural speciflcations and design features deemed signiflcant based upon commonly accepted architectural principles of the local community. Analysis: The proposed project enhances the character and overall aesthetics of the surrounding area. The City of Winter Springs is comprised of diverse architectural styles and, therefore, the proposed project represents a positive addition to this area of the City. 5. The proposed project has incorporated signiflcant architectural enhancements such as concrete masonry units with stucco, wrought iron, columns and piers, porches, arches, planting areas, display windows, and other distinctive design detailing and promoting the character of the community. Analysis: The proposed units are designed to contribute to the quality architectural styles that are typical of the surrounding area. This project represents a progressive addition to the City of Winter Springs. Signiflcant design features include architectural design elements columns, straight lines, and neutral colors and facades of brick and stone flnishes on the structure. 152 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M 4 0 1 | W E D N E S D A Y , N O V E M B E R 4 , 2 0 2 0 | P A G E 13 O F 22 Waiver Requirement Section 20-34. – Waivers. Any real property owner may flle a waiver application requesting a waiver for their real property from any term and condition of this chapter (except from the list of permitted, conditional and prohibited uses set forth in any zoning district category). The Planning and Zoning Board shall be required to review all waiver applications and make a written recommendation to the City Commission. Such recommendation shall include the reasons for the Board’s recommendation and show the board has considered the applicable waiver criteria set forth in this section. Upon receipt of the Planning and Zoning Board’s recommendation, the City Commission shall make a flnal decision on the application. If the City Commission determines that the Planning and Zoning Board has not made a recommendation on an application within a reasonable period of time, the City Commission may, at its discretion, consider an application without the Planning and Zoning Board's recommendation. All waiver recommendations and flnal decisions shall comply with the following criteria: Waiver criteria set forth in Subsection 20-34(d) are as follows: 1. The applicant clearly demonstrates that the applicable term or condition clearly creates an illogical, impossible, impractical, or patently unreasonable result related to the proposed property and development. 2. The proposed development plan is in substantial compliance with this chapter and in compliance with the comprehensive plan. 3. The proposed development plan will signiflcantly enhance the real property. 4. The proposed development plan serves the public health, safety, and welfare. 5. The waiver will not diminish property values in or alter the essential character of the surrounding neighborhood. 6. The waiver granted is the minimum waiver that will eliminate or reduce the illogical, impossible, impractical, or patently unreasonable result caused by the applicable term or condition under this chapter. 7. The proposed development plan is compatible and harmonious with the surrounding neighborhood. 8. Whether the applicant has agreed to execute a binding development agreement required by city to incorporate the terms and conditions of 153 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M 4 0 1 | W E D N E S D A Y , N O V E M B E R 4 , 2 0 2 0 | P A G E 14 OF 22 approval deemed necessary by the city commission including, but not limited to, any mitigative techniques and plans required by City Code. The Applicant requests that the Planning and Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency to consider the one (1) waiver request listed below: Waivers Request/Justification 1. The applicant requests a Waiver from Winter Springs City Code Sec. 20- 605(b) and (d), which requires a total 27 feet of streetscape area consisting of three component parts: (1) 5-foot landscape area; (ii) 6-foot sidewalk; and (iii) 16-foot landscape and treescape area for planting canopy trees which will line the right-of-way. The waiver is to instead allow (i) an 11 ft. landscape and treescape area; (ii) a 6-foot sidewalk; and (iii) a 10 ft. landscape and treescape area adjacent to the right-of-way for a total of a 27 ft. area. In addition, the waiver requests that the applicant be permitted to plant understory trees in the right-of-way in lieu of required canopy trees. Justiflcation: The Applicant is requesting a waiver due to the existing conditions on site. The flrst 5’ of the site adjacent to the roadway has a storm pipe under the grass area and also an 8” water main. The site should avoid any plantings, if possible, above or within 6’ to 8’ of the water and drainage pipes. At 10’ from the road we have overhead power lines. The site should avoid large canopy trees to a point of 15’ on either side of the power lines. There is only 20’ of green area within the ROW so that means if the City wants canopy trees the trees need to be located on the Chau property. That is where the site is presently showing canopy trees in the 10’ buffer. The Applicant requests the mix of canopy and understory trees within the buffer that as proposed in the plan along with the mix of shrubs and groundcovers. The Applicant had generated a cross section sketch showing the existing and proposed streetscape treatments. Looking at the Concept Section Sketch the storm pipe, the water main, the sidewalk and the overhead power lines are best located in the flrst 10’ of the Public ROW. The concept leaves the most room for the vegetation proposed. This provides the site with 19.5’ of green area to plant all of the vegetation. Due to the location of the overhead power lines, the Applicant requests that they utilize understory trees. The Applicant requests to spot the understory trees along the ROW where appropriate, but within the 9.5’ adjacent to the property line. The trees were located so as not to compete or restrict the already proposed canopy and understory trees in the on-site 10’ landscape buffer, and to be sensitive of the overhead power lines. 154 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M 4 0 1 | W E D N E S D A Y , N O V E M B E R 4 , 2 0 2 0 | P A G E 15 OF 22 As it relates to the requirement for a 6’ wide sidewalk the Applicant is adding 6” width to each side of the existing sidewalk to create a 6’ wide sidewalk. The fact that the sidewalk will have to meander at the driveways to meet FDOT Design will add some interest to the sidewalk as well. The meandering of the sidewalk and the proposed 19.5’ deep landscape buffer that will result will be a deflnite plus, without having a major impact on the overall project. Since the FDOT right-of-way/corridor has signiflcant utilities, the Applicant and the City will work together to meet the intent of the Ordinance. City Code: Sec. 20-605. – Streetscape Requirements. In evaluation of the one (1) proposed waiver request, the Applicant has satisfled the eight (8) speciflc criteria listed above. The Applicant submitted development plans on May 30, 2018 and since the plans were originally submitted Sec. 20-600 (Ordinance 2020-02) was amended and became effective on April 27, 2020. The Applicant is a requesting waiver due to the existing conditions of overhead power lines and underground utilities, which makes it difflcult for the Applicant to meet the criteria exactly as required in Code. The City has met with the Applicant and has determined that the request is not unreasonable. The Applicant will maintain the required 27’ streetscape albeit in a varied manner from Code requirements. The proposed development plan is in substantial compliance with Chapter 20 and in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. The streetscape will signiflcantly enhance the real property will continue to serve the public health, safety, and welfare for the citizens. The waiver will not diminish property values in or alter the essential character of the surrounding neighborhood, the streetscape will enhance and ensure compatible and be harmonious with the surrounding area. The waiver request is a minimum appeal that is logical, possible, and is practical under this Chapter. The City and the Applicant are prepared to execute a binding Development Agreement to incorporate the terms and conditions of approval deemed necessary by the City Commission including, but not limited to, any mitigative techniques and plans required by City Code. 155 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M 4 0 1 | W E D N E S D A Y , N O V E M B E R 4 , 2 0 2 0 | P A G E 16 OF 22 Reports: The Final Engineering submittal is required to include the following reports or updates of previously prepared reports for the same property. Reports March 16, 2018 Geo Technical Report | Terracon June 12, 2018 Fire Flow Calculations | FEG June 20, 2018 Surface Water Management System Report | FEG June 22, 2018 Bio-Tech Consulting, Inc. July 11, 2018 Water Flow | FEG July 11, 2018 Water Demand | FEG July 2018 Trafflc Impact Analysis | Trafflc Planning and Design, Inc. October 16, 2018 Jurisdictional Veriflcation | Army Corp of Engineers December 21, 2018 Permit 154309-1 | St. Johns River Water Management District February 19, 2019 Addendum Surface Water Management System Report | FEG June 2019 Addendum Trafflc Impact Analysis | Trafflc Planning and Design, Inc. August 15, 2019 Driveway Permit Package October 28, 2019 Sewer Application Offlce Phase 1 | FDEP October 28, 2019 Sewer Application Phase 1 | FDEP December 2019 Wastewater Collection | FDEP February 20, 2020 Wasterwater Flow Estimate | FEG February 20, 2020 Water Demand Estimate | FEG February 20, 2020 Fiscal Impact Statement 156 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M 4 0 1 | W E D N E S D A Y , N O V E M B E R 4 , 2 0 2 0 | P A G E 17 O F 22 Procedural History: May 30, 2018 Application Submittal Date August 13, 2019 Community Workshop Meeting November 4, 2020 Planning & Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency | Recommendation Applicable Law, Public Policy, and Events: Florida Statutes 163.2511-163.3246: Growth Policy; County and Municipal Planning; Land Development Regulation (Provides that land development regulations for municipal planning be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan). Home Rule Powers Code of Ordinances City of Winter Springs. Section 20-1. Deflnitions. Section 20-34 Waivers Ch20, Section 20-605. – Streetscape Requirements. C-1 Neighborhood Commercial Districts S.R. 434 Corridor Vision Plan S.R. 434 Corridor Overlay District Ch5, Section 5-8. - Specimen or historic trees. City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan. Future Land Use Element, Policy 1.1.6 Fiscal Impact: Approval of the Aesthetic Review and Final Engineering Plan allows the subject property to be developed as multi-phased development. Valorem Tax and State Shared Revenues (Revenue Sharing and Half-Cent Sales Tax). The assessed value of the Development Area 1 is anticipated to be on the order of $2,038,000 based on an estimated value $200 per SF of medical office building area. The assessed value of Development Area 2, retail is anticipated to be on the order of $1,120,000 based on an estimated value of $175 per SF of building area. The assessed value Development Area 3, the Assisted Living Facility is anticipated to be on the order of $9,120,000 based on an estimated value of $80,000 per unit. The City’s State shared revenue is estimated based on retail sales generated by the future 6,400 SF Retail. It is estimated that the proposed retail will generate a yearly sales volume on the order of $3,200,000 based on estimated sales of $500 per SF of retail. As such, the State Shared Revenue to the City of Winter Springs would be approximately $16,000 per year from the retail building. 157 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M 4 0 1 | W E D N E S D A Y , N O V E M B E R 4 , 2 0 2 0 | P A G E 18 OF 22 The total revenue to the City of Winter Springs would be approximately $5,000 per year for Development Area 1 development and $46,000 per year for the overall Development Areas 2 and 3. Final Development Plan Approval: The City Commission may approve Final Engineering Plans separately and prior to approval of the flnal plat as provided in Section 9-74 of the City Code. Specimen Tree Approval: Pursuant to Chapter 5, Tree Protection and Preservation Sec. 5-8 - Specimen or historic trees, the Applicant has requested the removal of two specimen trees and the relocation of two specimen trees as depicted on the Final Engineering Plans. Per Code the City Arborist has determined that the Applicant has engaged in good faith to preserve existing trees onsite, relocated two existing specimen trees onsite, provided alternative design and removal, presented extraordinary hardships, provided waiver fees, and adhere to tree replacement requirements. The City Arborist recommends approval of the Applicant’s request to the City Commission. Development Agreement: The Applicant has agreed to speciflc Conditions of Approval for the Plan and Waivers as negotiated in the Developer’s Agreement. Pursuant to Section 20-29 of the City Code, all development projects requiring a community workshop pursuant to Section 20-29.1 shall be required to be memorialized in a binding Development Agreement executed by the City and the property owner. Community workshops are required for all new commercial development, under Section 20-29.1. A Community Workshop was held on August 13, 2019. The draft Development Agreement is enclosed as an Exhibit hereto. The Development Agreement has been drafted to address several important issues regarding the proposed Final Engineering Plans and the eventual platting of this project. 158 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M 4 0 1 | W E D N E S D A Y , N O V E M B E R 4 , 2 0 2 0 | P A G E 19 OF 22 The primary obligations of the Development Agreement are as follows: 1. A Cross Access Easement, Shared Parking Agreement, and Utilities and Drainage Easements shall be approved and provided to the City prior to the approval of any future lot split or subdivision of the Property. Shared parking between Development Area 1 (Medical Offlce) and Development Area 3 (Assisted Living Facility) shall be required in the event the applicant splits or subdivides the Property. Should the parties ever mutually desire to terminate said Easements and Shared Parking Agreement, prior to executing such termination, the Parties shall seek and receive consent from the City of Winter Springs and obtain an amendment to the site plan. 2. The Developer shall be required to stub-out a common driveway access to the adjacent parcel, Parcel ID 34-20-30-5AW-0000-048D, for future connection to that parcel either prior to receiving a certiflcate of occupancy for the Development Area 2 (Retail Building) or upon the development of the adjacent parcel, whichever occurs flrst. Further, should the adjacent property owner ever develop that parcel, the Developer agrees it shall enter into a Cross Access Easement with the adjacent property owner in a form satisfactory to the City. Should the parties ever mutually desire to terminate said Cross Access Easement over the common driveway access, prior to executing such termination, the Parties shall seek and receive consent from the City of Winter Springs and obtain an amendment to the site plan. 3. Upon completion of Phase One, the Development Areas 2 and 3 shall be graded, seeded, and mulched in preparation for future development. The Developer shall be required to maintain the grass and vegetation in Development Areas 2 and 3 prior to commencement of construction in these Areas. 4. Developer shall be required in Phase One to plant at least 639 caliper inches of new replacement trees, with the remaining 150 caliper inches to be replaced in Phases Two and Three. All required tree replacements in each Development Area shall be planted prior to the issuance of any flnal certiflcate of occupancy for any building in such Development Area. Tree replacements and landscaping shall be subject to the obligation of ongoing maintenance and replacement for the flrst two years following planting, at the Developer’s expense, if the City determines, after reasonable inspection, that any tree or landscaping has become severely diseased or damaged to the point that the viability of the tree or landscaping has been signiflcantly compromised. In the event that Developer fails to perform the necessary 159 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M 4 0 1 | W E D N E S D A Y , N O V E M B E R 4 , 2 0 2 0 | P A G E 20 OF 22 maintenance, repairs or replacements of any of the trees or landscaping, the City shall have the right, but not obligation, to conduct said maintenance, repairs or replacements and recover the actual cost thereof from the Developer. Prior to exercising that right, the City shall provide the Developer written notice and an explanation of the speciflc default and at least thirty (30) days in which to cure the default. If Developer fails to cure the default by the end of the cure period, the City may exercise its rights to maintain and replace at any time thereafter. The Developer shall additionally submit: (1) a $65,700.00 tree bank mitigation payment for trees that are not possible to replace on the Property; and (2) a Landscape Performance and Maintenance Bond in a form acceptable to the City Attorney ensuring planting and installation of all required trees and landscaping, including in all three Development Areas, should the Project or any individual Phase be abandoned after the Property has been cleared and proper maintenance of the trees for two (2) years after planting. Given the phased nature and lengthy duration of the Project, the Landscape Performance and Maintenance bond must have a duration that is automatically extended, without notice to the surety, for successive periods until all landscaping requirements have been completed or be provided in a similar form acceptable to the City Attorney. The tree bank mitigation payment and Landscape Performance and Maintenance Bond shall be submitted prior to obtaining the flrst clearing and grading or building permit, whichever is earlier. 5. The 15’ Utility Easement as referenced on Sheets C-5A2 and C-7B of the Final Engineering Plans shall be dedicated and an appropriate bill of sale for the sanitary sewer main and associated improvements shall be delivered to the City prior to the issuance of the certiflcate of occupancy for Phase One in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. Upon completion and acceptance of the sanitary sewer main by the City, conveyance of the sanitary sewer improvements shall be by bill of sale and free and clear of all liens. 6. The Final Engineering Plans shall be updated to provide a detail of the potable water service line and the above-ground installation of an RPZ backfiow prevention assembly needs to be included and shown. 7. No building in the Project shall exceed a height of three stories. 160 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M 4 0 1 | W E D N E S D A Y , N O V E M B E R 4 , 2 0 2 0 | P A G E 21 OF 22 8. The City Commission herein imposes certain use restrictions greater than those otherwise specifled in the C-1 zoning district to ensure any negative impacts of the commercial development are minimized and to ensure the future development is compatible with the surrounding uses. The following uses shall be permitted on the Property: 1. Animal hospitals and veterinary clinics (with no outside kennels) 2. Art supplies and picture framing shops 3. Artists’ (such as painters, sculptures, and craft makers) studios 4. Cleaners, Alterations, Tailoring and Shoe Repair 5. Confectionary and ice cream stores (including outside dining) 6. Dance and music studios 7. Health and exercise clubs and athletic training facilities 8. Interior decorating and draperies 9. Offlce a. Advertising Agencies b. Attorney c. Bookkeeper d. Dental e. Insurance f. Medical g. Professional and Business h. Title Companies i. Travel Agency 10. Pet shops and grooming 11. Photographic studios 12. Restaurants and outdoor dining; cafes 13. Retail uses as follows: a. Bakery b. Bicycle c. Bookstore d. Hardware e. Health Food f. Florist g. Offlce and Stationary Supplies 14. Retirement homes, including nursing homes, assisted living facilities, and independent living facilities 15. Swimming pool sales, service and supplies 161 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M 4 0 1 | W E D N E S D A Y , N O V E M B E R 4 , 2 0 2 0 | P A G E 22 OF 22 9. Should the Developer fail to receive building permits and substantially commence vertical construction of buildings within three years of receiving flnal certiflcate of occupancy for Phase I of the project, the City Commission has the option to terminate the Agreement. Approval is conditioned upon execution of the Development Agreement and subject to the terms and conditions contained therein. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency forward a recommendation of approval to the City Commission for Final Engineering/Site Plan Approval, Aesthetic Plan Approval for the Medical Offlce, Specimen Tree Removal, certain Waivers from the City Code, and Development Agreement in order to construct a Medical Offlce, Assisted Living Facility, and Retail building on the Property in a phased development. Attachments: Exhibit 1 – Vicinity Map Exhibit 2 – Aesthetic Review Exhibit 3 – Waiver Request Exhibit 4 – Final Engineering Plans Exhibit 5 – Development Agreement 162 Vicinity Map Parcel ID# 34-20-30-5AW-0000-048A 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 Son Chau 08/07/2020 800 Long Lake Drive Oviedo, FL 32765 drchau54@yahoo.com 407-895-0324 Same as applicant Winter Springs Medical Office East S.R. 434 Winter Springs, FL 32708 34-20-30-5AW-0000-048A 224,508 S.F. (5.15 Acres) Vacant/Commercial C-1 Commercial A waiver is being requested from Winter Springs City Code Sec. 20-605(b). Please refer to attached narrative for additional clarification and justification for the waiver requested. Please refer to attached narrative for justification response. 174 Please refer to attached narrative for justification response. Please refer to attached narrative for justification response. Please refer to attached narrative for justification response. Please refer to attached narrative for justification response. Please refer to attached narrative for justification response. Please refer to attached narrative for justification response. 175 176 X Sam J. Sebaali, Fulvio Romano, and Amine Harb Oral Factual testimony, photographs, rendering of proposed buildings and streetscape frontage, architectural elevations, site plans and landscape plans. X X X X X X 177 5127 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 200 Orlando, FL 32809 Orlando, FL 32809 Phone: 407-895-0324 Fax: 407-895-0325 2302 Parklake Drive, Suite 134 Atlanta, GA 30345 Phone: 1-877-857-1581 Fax: 1-877-857-1582 August 7, 2020 Ms. Marla Molina, Senior City Planner City of Winter Springs Community Development Department 1126 State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 Subject: Waiver Application Justification Winter Springs Medical Office Site Plan Case Number: ZP2018-00000015 FEG Project No. 17-107 Please find attached plans and other documents to support the Waiver request from Winter Springs Code Sec. 20-605(b). Specifically, a waiver is being requested from Winter Springs City Code Sec. 20-605(b) (Streetscape Requirements) to allow a 10 ft. landscape and treescape area adjacent to the R.O.W., followed by a 6- foot sidewalk, and an additional 11 ft. of landscape and treescape area (total 27 feet) in lieu of the required 5 ft. landscape area adjacent to the R.O.W., followed by a 6 ft. sidewalk, and a 16-foot landscape and treescape area (total 27 feet). In addition, the waiver is to allow planting of understory trees in the R.O.W. in lieu of the required canopy trees. The following is an item-by-item response to each of the waiver application justification questions: Demonstrate that the applicable term or condition clearly creates an illogical, impossible, impractical, or patently unreasonable result related to the proposed property and development? This waiver is required due to conflicts related to the existing conditions within the SR 434 right-of- way along the site frontage including overhead power lines and underground utilities, which would prohibit planting trees in the configuration required by the code. As a result, adjustment to the landscape configuration is being requested to allow the streetscape planting to take place within the restricted conditions without impacting existing utilities. The existing utilities are part of the public infrastructure, and it would not be possible, practical or reasonable to modify the existing utilities as part of the proposed development, since such modification would require significant infrastructure retrofit work related to SR 434 storm systems, public water main, and overhead electric beyond the scope of this project. 178 5127 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 200 Orlando, FL 32826 Phone: 407-895-0324 Fax: 407-895-0325 2302 Parklake Drive, Suite 134 Atlanta, GA 30345 Phone: 1-877-857-1581 Fax: 1-877-857-1582 Demonstrate that the proposed development plan is in substantial compliance with Chapter 20 of the City’s Code of Ordinances and in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan? Apart from the requested waiver to City Code Sec. 20-605(b), the proposed development plan is in substantial compliance with Chapter 20 of the City’s Code of Ordinances and in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. The Plans have been previously reviewed and approved by City Staff. Although the applicant is requesting this waiver, they have made every effort to provide streetscape to meet the intent of City Code Sec. 20-605(b). Will the proposed development plan significantly enhance the real property? Justification: The existing property is undeveloped and provides no use to the public. The proposed development plan will enhance the real property by allowing the owner to construct a medical office to serve the community and enhance the SR 434 corridor with the proposed streetscape and provide significant on-site landscaping along the SR 434 corridor and the perimeter of the site. Will the proposed development plan serve the public health, safety, and welfare of the City of Winter Springs? Justification: The proposed development includes a medical office, which will specifically serve the public health and welfare of the City of Winter Springs. In addition, the proposed development includes an on-site stormwater management system, which will enhance the existing drainage conditions in the area by significantly limiting the off-site discharge of stormwater to the existing downstream system, which as existing deficiencies. Will the waiver diminish property values in or alter the essential character of the surrounding neighborhood? Justification: The proposed development will enhance the property values in the area and will not alter the essential character of the surrounding neighborhood which includes other similar office and commercial uses fronting SR 434. Overwhelming support was provided at the community meeting by the surrounding neighbors. Is the waiver request the minimum waiver that will eliminate or reduce the illogical, impossible, impractical, or patently unreasonable result caused by the applicable term or condition under Chapter 20 – Zoning? Justification: Based on the existing conditions of the SR 434 right-of-way, the requested waiver is the minimum waiver that will reduce the impractical conditions of the City Code Sec. 20-605(b). Is the proposed development plan compatible and harmonious with the surrounding neighborhood? Justification: The proposed development plan is compatible and harmonious with the surrounding neighborhood, which includes other similar office and commercial uses fronting SR 434. 179 5127 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 200 Orlando, FL 32809 Phone: 407-895-0324 Fax: 407-895-0325 2302 Parklake Drive, Suite 134 Atlanta, GA 30345 Phone: 1-877-857-1581 Fax: 1-877-857-1582 I trust this letter and the attached documents adequately address the waiver allow site plan approval. Should you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at 407-895-0324 or by email at SSebaali@feg-inc.us. Sincerely, Florida Engineering Group, Inc. Sam J. Sebaali, P.E., LEED®AP President cc: Truc T Nguyen, Manager, Chau Family Holdings II, LLC 180 5127 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 200 Orlando, FL 32809 Orlando, FL 32809 Phone: 407-895-0324 Fax: 407-895-0325 2302 Parklake Drive, Suite 134 Atlanta, GA 30345 Phone: 1-877-857-1581 Fax: 1-877-857-1582 September 18, 2020 Mr. Kevin Maddox, City Arborist City of Winter Springs Community Development Department 1126 State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 Subject: Specimen Tree Removal - Winter Springs Medical Office Site Plan Case Number: ZP2018-00000015 FEG Project No. 17-107 Dear Mr. Kevin Maddox, Per our meeting with City Staff on Monday May 6, 2019, the Tree Removal and Preservation Chart calculations were revised and included on the Demo and Landscape Plan drawings showing the Specimen trees (trees 24” or more) and other trees, which are proposed to be removed. As identified by the Tree Survey and the City Arborist, there are 5 Specimen Trees on-site, all of which are Canopy Trees, out of which we are proposing to remove 4 Specimen Canopy trees. This letter serves as a formal request for the City Manager’s approval of the proposed Specimen tree removal as required by Sec. 5-8 of the City of Winter Springs Code of Ordinances. The proposed Specimen tree removal is necessary, since development of the site requires significant filling, which would not allow tree preservation. We have made every effort to preserve as many trees as possible in areas of the site where tree preservation was possible. Of the 5 Specimen Canopy trees on-site, we have preserved 1 maple Specimen Canopy tree. The 4 Specimen Canopy trees to be removed consist of 2 oak trees in the upland area. The other remaining 2 Specimen Canopy trees to be removed include 1 maple tree and 1 cypress tree and are in the wetland area. The Tree Removal Charts are shown on Drawing Sheet C-4B included with this submittal and the Tree Preservation List and Mitigation calculations are shown on Drawing Sheet L-1 included with this submittal. It should be noted that the tree removal in the wetland areas has already been mitigated by the applicant through preservation of other environmental areas within the basin and the mitigation has already been paid for as part of the SJRWMD permitting process. The tree replacement on-site meets code (not counting trees in wetlands) and most of the trees will be planted in Phase I and will also include the entire site perimeter adjacent to Hacienda Drive and SR 434. The remainder of the trees will be planted in the future phases and consist mainly of internal landscaping, which cannot be planted until future development. I trust this letter and the attached documents adequately address the Specimen tree removal and allow site plan approval. Should you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at 407-895-0324 or by email at SSebaali@feg-inc.us. Sincerely, Florida Engineering Group, Inc. Sam J. Sebaali, P.E., LEED®AP President 181 NOT TO SCALESITE VICINITY MAP(407) 327-7588UTILITY COMPANIESSEWER: WATER:GEOTECHNICAL:ENVIRONMENTAL(407) 327-7588(407) 629-1010(561) 997-0240TELEPHONE: ELECTRIC:SURVEYOR:OVIEDO, FL 32765E-MAIL:800 LONG LAKE DRIVEOWNER/APPLICANT: SON CHAU AND TRUC NGUYENCITY OF WINTER SPRINGSCITY OF WINTER SPRINGSDUKE ENERGYAT&TPLAN INDEXC-1FAX:PHONE:WINTER PARK, FL 32789TERRACON CONSULTANTS, INC.FAX:PHONE:ORLANDO, FL 328033025 E. SOUTH STREET BIO-TECH CONSULTING, INC. PHONE:ORLANDO, FL 328032012 E. ROBINSON STREET1675 LEE ROADACCURIGHT SURVEYS OF ORLANDO, INC.DRCHAU54@YAHOO.COM(407) 740-6110(407) 740-6112(407) 894-5969(407) 894-5970(407) 894-6314SITEC-7ASITE UTILITY PLAN - PHASE ISITE PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN - PHASE I OVERALL MASTER SITE PLANLEGEND, NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONSBOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHIC & TREE SURVEYC-5AC-4AC-3C-2COVER SHEET(407) 532-8092CABLE: CHARTER COMMUNICATIONSL-2SITE IRRIGATION PLAN SITE LANDSCAPE PLAN L-1SITE DEMOLITION, STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION, AND TREE REMOVAL AND PRESERVATION PLANC-6A(386) 624-8833GAS: FLORIDA PUBLIC UTILITIES PARCEL I.D. No. 34-20-30-5AW-0000-048AFLORIDAENGINEERINGGROUPEngineering the FutureFEG5127 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 200Orlando, FL 32809Phone: 407-895-0324Fax: 407-895-0325www.feg-inc.us17-107_COVER.DWGC-8SITE CONSTRUCTION DETAILSC-9ASITE CROSS SECTIONS (1 OF 3)SAM J. SEBAALI, P.E.LICENSE NO. 42075FLORIDA ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.CERTIFICATE No. EB-0006595FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANWINTER SPRINGS MEDICAL OFFICEWINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDAEAST STATE ROAD 434C-4BSITE DEMOLITION AND STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION, AND TREE REMOVAL AND PRESERVATION NOTESSITE GEOMETRY PLAN - PHASE IC-5BSITE GEOMETRY NOTES - PHASE IC-5CSITE PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES - PHASE IC-6BC-7BSITE UTILITY NOTES - PHASE I(407) 665-5642FIBER OPTIC: SEMINOLE COUNTY TRAFFIC ENGINEERINGC-10CITY DETAILSC-9BSITE CROSS SECTIONS (2 OF 3)C-9CSITE CROSS SECTIONS (3 OF 3)SITE WETLAND IMPACT C-5DC-11BFIRE TRUCK TURN PLANC-11ATRUCK TURN PLANOVERALL AERIAL AND SIGHT LINE PLANC-5EC-5A1MASTER PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C-5A2MASTER UTILITY PLANSL-1SITE LIGHTING PLANSL-2SITE LIGHTING SPECIFICATIONSOVERALL MASTER SITE NOTESC-5A0182 28C-22PROJECT NO.SCALEDATESHEET NO.SHEET OF17-107JUNE 20, 2018NOTED183 N.T.S.2817-107_GeneralNotes.dwgLEGEND, NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONSC-335127 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 200Orlando, FL 32809Phone: 407-895-0324Fax: 407-895-0325www.feg-inc.usDESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY APPROVED BYPROJECT NO.SCALEDATESHEET NO.SHEET OF17-107JUNE 20, 2018FLORIDAENGINEERINGGROUPEngineering the FutureFEGSJSTHIS ITEM HAS BEENELECTRONICALLY SIGNED ANDSEALED BY (ENGINEER), P.E. ON(DATE) USING A DIGITAL SIGNATURE.PRINTED COPIES OF THISDOCUMENT ARE NOT CONSIDEREDSIGNED AND SEALED AND THESIGNATURE MUST BE VERIFIED ONANY ELECTRONIC COPIES.SAM J. SEBAALI, P.E.LICENSE NO. 42075FLORIDA ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.CERTIFICATE No. EB-0006595FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANWINTER SPRINGS MEDICAL OFFICEORLANDO, FLORIDAEAST STATE ROAD 434JT SJS SJSDATE REVISIONS BYCHECKED184 35S17°21'23"E 173.47' DESC S02°06'02"E57.01' DESCS09°26'16"ECURVE DATAΔ = 04°09'03"R = 1330.00'L = 96.35'CHORDN74°43'06"E96.33' DESCN67°33'14"E96.36' MEASCURVE DATAΔ = 04°09'03"R = 1580.00'L = 114.46'CHORDS74°43'08"W114.44' DESCS67°37'58"W114.37' MEASN72°38'37"E34.00' DESCN65°05'47"E34.06' MEASS17°21'23"E21.40' DESCS24°31'33"E21.40' MEASPARCEL: 34-20-30-5MD-OC00-0000OWNER: HACIENDA VILLAGE CO-OP INCORB 2799, PG 58957.10' MEASE STATE ROAD 434(R/W WIDTH VARIES)R/W MAP SECTION 77580-2610PARCEL: 3 4 - 2 0 - 3 0 - 5 A W - 0 0 0 0 - 0 4 8 D OWNER: C O V A R R U B I A & P I N T O LUISA 22 C A L L E S A N I G A N C I O ORB 8713 , P G 1 1 2 6UPEBFHSDTVUPUPUPUPN65°28'27"E 759.75' MEASN72°38'37"E 759.88' DESCS72°38'37"W 808.88' DESCS65°27'46"W 808.87' MEASS17°21'23"E 173.60' DESCS24°29'37"E 173.57' MEAS N13°12'20 " W 2 5 0 . 0 0 ' D E S C N20°22'34" W 2 5 0 . 0 4 ' M E A S S3257.01 D S39°44'52 E 57.29' MEAS FOBD D D D DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD D S S SHACIENDA DRIVE (R/W WIDTH VARIES)PARCEL: 34-20-30-5MD-OC00-0000OWNER: HACIENDA VILLAGE CO-OP INCORB 2799, PG 589OW OWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOW31.632.033.036.337.435.5 34.237.336.9 38.034.535.733.631.8 37.639.240.940.539.840.339.042.4338.142.3641.0633.3 41.5337.041.4935.635.642.0535.535.635.638.539.237.138.940.241.46642.4841.2937.7437.3740.9742.0238.1241.5541.0440.9641.2941.0 2 40.9041.3941.4240.9940.5940.2040.5839.4239.9439.5739.2338.9038.8738.6138.5638.3838.2438.7438.5638.2437.9037.8133.032.631.933.87 36.033.12 35.237.938.3234.533.232.132.233.69 32.634.035.035.035.534.736.436.935.735.435.937.136.836.436.937.737.838.438.736.236.236.637.338.538.638.836.137.936.639.4038.538.842.038.737.239.8439.440.0839.242.140.5440.740.740.040.8741.1239.541.2138.538.9335.135.9 37.938.737.237.338.038.237.7 35.51 33.633.536.27 34.8 3734.8636.335.435.9 34.13 34.0437.833.6036.436.532.81 37.835.433.4733.4133.7336.337.739.433.5934.5034.4735.18 33.735.538.134.234.635.69 35.436.56 36.47 38.537.539.737.17 39.636.91 35.637.12 34.635.339.842.433.639.9.342.734.33433.833.133.5 33.635.235 535.52.4792741.9142.6442.7942.7642.8442.8042.8041.7242.2841.7642.4741.2841.4041.1941.9341.5141.8241.2041.7241.5540.9741.4441.4341.0240.8140.5540.8840.9840.6539.9640.3139.8840.3039.5940.3639.9639.6139.1739.6338.7739.1839.2438.9438.5738.4838.1138.0437.237.6637.37.7737.7838.0037.7838.083738.0438.2837.9738.6638.2137.9938.3238.5738.7738.7538.9438.6438.4638.4438.3438.4739.2438.9438.9139.0439.2338.6638.7339.3439.0038.5739.0139.402' CONC CURB39.6439.4239.5839.1739.5539.9139.8739.6739.7139.6239.3139.4440.1640.4740.0640.1040.7240.6440.453641.0339.233737.737.1837.3737.2237.10 36.21 34.82 3535.56 34.2734.27 S33.83 33.3333.74 32.9533.05 32.9533.00 FND 4"X4" CMNO #33.53FND N&DLB #35564133.7334.3234.2435.14 3835.28 35.0135.7035.72 35.5636.46 33.9336.76 36.5836.686.92 36.14 S72°38'37"W30.00' DESCS65°21'30"W30.09' MEAS133.4'414039383634363534333435363732333533363838 383736353433TOP=42.30NE INV=32.70NW INV=33.00SW INV=32.9533TOP=39.30BOTTOM=32.40(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=37.99BOTTOM=31.29(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)34 35TOP=37.98BOTTOM=32.38(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=39.23BOTTOM=32.93(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)35TOP=40.74(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)35ASPHALTASPHALTASPHALT36ASPHALT37ASPHALT38ASPHALT 39ASPHALT ASPHALT 402' CONC CURB402' CONC CURB2' CONC CURB402' CONC CURRB2' CONC CURB392' CONC CURB8" CONC CURB 398" CONC CURB 39CBWCW39CWCWCW363735TOP=33.49NE INV=26.84(6" CLAY)SE INV=26.95(6" CLAY)SW INV=26.90(6" CLAY)TOP=32.00NE INV=25.33(6" CLAY)NW INV=26.00(6" CLAY)SE INV=25.20(6" CLAY)3637393840414141VACANT - NO BUILDINGSNO #FND 1-1/4" IPNO #FND 5/8" IRNO #SET 1/2" IRLB #4475FND 3/4" IPNO #FND 3/4" IP NO #FND 5/8" IRFND N&DLB #3556FND 1-1/4" IPLS #2005FND 1-1/4" IPLS #2005N20°22'34 " W 2 5 0 . 0 4 ' M E A S 2 50' MEAS ASPHALT 41.0841.42.7241.7741.8741.7041.6141.37BOREHOLE #8BOREHOLE #7BOREHOLE #6BOREHOLE #5BOREHOLE #13BOREHOLE #14BOREHOLE #3BOREHOLE #10BOREHOLE #1BOREHOLE #2BOREHOLE #12BOREHOLE #4BOREHOLE #9BOREHOLE #1139.337.936.636.737.237.738.636.035.435.536.635.033.432.5CONCCWDATUM = NAVD 88SITE BENCH M A R K # 1BENCHMARK N&DSITE BENCHMARK #2ELEVATION = 38.55ELEVATION = 4 2 . 7 1 BENCHMA R K N & DFH DATUM = N A V D 8 8WATER MAINWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW8" DIWETLANDWETLANDFLAGGED BYBIO - TECHWETLANDWETLANDFLAGGED BYBIO - TECHWL 1829WL 1828WL 1827WL 1827WL 1825WL NO#WL 1284WL 1823WL 1812WL 1838WL 1837WL 1785WL 1821WL 1787WL 1788WL 1789WL 1775WL 1776WL 1777WL 1778WL 1779WL 1780WL 1781WL 1782WL 1783WL 1784L1L2L3L4L5L6 L7L8L9L10L11L12L14L16L17L18L19L22 L23 L24L25L26L27 L28L29L30L31L32L20L21L13WL 1779AL15WETLANDWETLANDFLAGGED BYBIO - TECHWETLANDWETLANDFLAGGED BYBIO - TECHWL 1829WL 1828WL 1827WL 1827WL 1825WL NO#WL 1284WL 1823WL 1812WL 1838WL 1837WL 1785WL 1821WL 1787WL 1788WL 1789WL 1775WL 1776WL 1777WL 1778WL 1779WL 1780WL 1781WL 1782WL 1783WL 1784WL 1779A675667636537611603600596591594585581577478474466552684683682681680679678677676672674673669671670668666665662661660659658657656655654653652651650646648649647644645643642640641639638637634635633632631630629628627626625624623622621620619617618616615614612613399610609396608607398606605604602601391390599597598595593384592382377588378587586376371584582372580579578368576575574573572571570569568567566565564563562561560559558557343556555554553551550340549548547546545544543542541540539538536535534237533532531530529527526525524523522520519518517516515514513512511510509508507506505504503502501500499498497496495494493492491490489488487486485484483482481480479477476473475472471470469468467465464463462461460459458457456455453454451452450449448447446443445444442441440439438437436435434433432431429430428427426425424423422420421419418417416415414413412411410409408407406405404403402401400397189187394182395181393184392389388179387177386173385383175381380379169167168166375374373163369370159160367366365364363362361360359358357356355354353352351350349348347346345344134342341131339338337336335334333332331330329328327326325324323322321320319318317316315314313312311310309308307306305304303302301300299298297296295294293292291290289288287286285284283282281280279278277276275274273272271270269268267266265264263262261260259258257256255254253252251250249248247246245244243242241240239238236235234233232231230229228227226225224223222221220219218217216212215214213211210209208207206205204203202201200199198197196195194193192191190188186185183180178176174172171170165164161162158156157155153152154150151149147148146144142145140143138141139137136135132133130129127128126125123124122121119120117118116115114111 113110112 109107 108106105 104102103100101989699979495929391908988868785848283817978807677737574717270676968656663646261596058565754555253515049484647444542433941403837363534333130322927282526242322211920181617151314101281197654231664663590589583521528WATER MAIN8" DI675667636537611603600596591594585581577478474466552684683682681680679678677676672674673669671670668666665662661660659658657656655654653652651650646648649647644645643642640641639638637634635633632631630629628627626625624623622621620619617618616615614612613399610609396608607398606605604602601391390599597598595593384592382377588378587586376371584582372580579578368576575574573572571570569568567566565564563562561560559558557343556555554553551550340549548547546545544543542541540539538536535534237533532531530529527526525524523522520519518517516515514513512511510509508507506505504503502501500499498497496495494493492491490489488487486485484483482481480479477476473475472471470469468467465464463462461460459458457456455453454451452450449448447446443445444442441440439438437436435434433432431429430428427426425424423422420421419418417416415414413412411410409408407406405404403402401400397189187394182395181393184392389388179387177386173385383175381380379169167168166375374373163369370159160367366365364363362361360359358357356355354353352351350349348347346345344134342341131339338337336335334333332331330329328327326325324323322321320319318317316315314313312311310309308307306305304303302301300299298297296295294293292291290289288287286285284283282281280279278277276275274273272271270269268267266265264263262261260259258257256255254253252251250249248247246245244243242241240239238236235234233232231230229228227226225224223222221220219218217216212215214213211210209208207206205204203202201200199198197196195194193192191190188186185183180178176174172171170165164161162158156157155153152154150151149147148146144142145140143138141139137136135132133130129127128126125123124122121119120117118116115114111 113110112 109107 108106105 1041021031001019896999794959293919089888687858482838179788076777375747172706769686566636462615960585657545552535150494846474445424339414038373635343331303229272825262423222119201816171513141012811976542316646635905895835215281"=30'2817-107_Plans.dwgSITE DEMOLITION, STORMWATERPOLLUTION PREVENTION, AND TREEREMOVAL AND PREVENTION PLANC-4A45127 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 200Orlando, FL 32809Phone: 407-895-0324Fax: 407-895-0325www.feg-inc.usDESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY APPROVED BYPROJECT NO.SCALEDATESHEET NO.SHEET OF17-107JUNE 20, 2018FLORIDAENGINEERINGGROUPEngineering the FutureFEGSJSTHIS ITEM HAS BEENELECTRONICALLY SIGNED ANDSEALED BY (ENGINEER), P.E. ON(DATE) USING A DIGITAL SIGNATURE.PRINTED COPIES OF THISDOCUMENT ARE NOT CONSIDEREDSIGNED AND SEALED AND THESIGNATURE MUST BE VERIFIED ONANY ELECTRONIC COPIES.SAM J. SEBAALI, P.E.LICENSE NO. 42075FLORIDA ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.CERTIFICATE No. EB-0006595FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANWINTER SPRINGS MEDICAL OFFICEORLANDO, FLORIDAEAST STATE ROAD 434JT SJS SJSDATE REVISIONS BYCHECKED185 N.T.S.2817-107_Plans.dwgSITE DEMOLITION AND STORMWATERPOLLUTION, AND TREE REMOVALAND PRESERVATION NOTESC-4B55127 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 200Orlando, FL 32809Phone: 407-895-0324Fax: 407-895-0325www.feg-inc.usDESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY APPROVED BYPROJECT NO.SCALEDATESHEET NO.SHEET OF17-107JUNE 20, 2018FLORIDAENGINEERINGGROUPEngineering the FutureFEGSJSTHIS ITEM HAS BEENELECTRONICALLY SIGNED ANDSEALED BY (ENGINEER), P.E. ON(DATE) USING A DIGITAL SIGNATURE.PRINTED COPIES OF THISDOCUMENT ARE NOT CONSIDEREDSIGNED AND SEALED AND THESIGNATURE MUST BE VERIFIED ONANY ELECTRONIC COPIES.SAM J. SEBAALI, P.E.LICENSE NO. 42075FLORIDA ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.CERTIFICATE No. EB-0006595FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANWINTER SPRINGS MEDICAL OFFICEORLANDO, FLORIDAEAST STATE ROAD 434JT SJS SJSDATE REVISIONS BYCHECKEDUPLANDS TREE REMOVAL CHART WETLANDS TREE REMOVAL CHART186 35S17°21'23"E 173.47' DESC S02°06'02"E57.01' DESCS09°26'16"ECURVE DATAΔ = 04°09'03"R = 1330.00'L = 96.35'CHORDN74°43'06"E96.33' DESCN67°33'14"E96.36' MEASCURVE DATAΔ = 04°09'03"R = 1580.00'L = 114.46'CHORDS74°43'08"W114.44' DESCS67°37'58"W114.37' MEASN72°38'37"E34.00' DESCN65°05'47"E34.06' MEASS17°21'23"E21.40' DESCS24°31'33"E21.40' MEASPARCEL: 34-20-30-5MD-OC00-0000OWNER: HACIENDA VILLAGE CO-OP INCORB 2799, PG 58957.10' MEASE STATE ROAD 434(R/W WIDTH VARIES)R/W MAP SECTION 77580-2610PARCEL: 3 4 - 2 0 - 3 0 - 5 A W - 0 0 0 0 - 0 4 8 D OWNER: C O V A R R U B I A & P I N T O LUISA 22 C A L L E S A N I G A N C I O ORB 8713 , P G 1 1 2 6UPEBFHSDUPUPUPN65°28'27"E 759.75' MEASN72°38'37"E 759.88' DESCS72°38'37"W 808.88' DESCS65°27'46"W 808.87' MEASS17°21'23"E 173.60' DESCS24°29'37"E 173.57' MEAS N13°12'20 " W 2 5 0 . 0 0 ' D E S C N20°22'34" W 2 5 0 . 0 4 ' M E A S S3257.01 D S39°44'52 E 57.29' MEASSS SHACIENDA DRIVE (R/W WIDTH VARIES)PARCEL: 34-20-30-5MD-OC00-0000OWNER: HACIENDA VILLAGE CO-OP INCORB 2799, PG 589OW OWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWSFND 4"X4" CMNO #FND N&DLB #3556S72°38'37"W30.00' DESCS65°21'30"W30.09' MEAS133.4'TOP=42.30NE INV=32.70NW INV=33.00SW INV=32.95TOP=39.30BOTTOM=32.40(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=37.99BOTTOM=31.29(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=37.98BOTTOM=32.38(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=39.23BOTTOM=32.93(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=40.74(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)ASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALT ASPHALT ASPHALT 2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURRB2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURB8" CONC CURB8" CONC CURBCBW CWCWCWTOP=33.49NE INV=26.84(6" CLAY)SE INV=26.95(6" CLAY)SW INV=26.90(6" CLAY)TOP=32.00NE INV=25.33(6" CLAY)NW INV=26.00(6" CLAY)SE INV=25.20(6" CLAY)VACANT - NO BUILDINGSNO #FND 1-1/4" IPNO #FND 5/8" IRNO #SET 1/2" IRLB #4475FND 3/4" IPNO #FND 3/4" IP NO # FND N&DLB #3556FND 1-1/4" IPLS #2005FND 1-1/4" IPLS #2005N20°22'34 " W 2 5 0 . 0 4 ' M E A S MEASASPHALTDATUM = NAVD 88SITE BENCH M A R K # 1BENCHMARK N&DSITE BENCHMARK #2ELEVATION = 38.55ELEVATION = 4 2 . 7 1 BENCHMA R K N & DFH DATUM = N A V D 8 8WATER MAINWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW8" DIWATER MAIN8" DI34-20-30 - 5 A W - 0 0 0 0-048D VARRUBIA & P I N T O N I G A N C I ODUPN13°12'20 " W 2 5 0 . 0 0 ' D E S C N20°22'34" W 2 5 0 . 0 4 ' M E A SOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWWOWOWOWOWOWOWOW OWOWWOWOWWWTOP=42.30NE INV=32.70NW INV=33.00SW INV=32.95(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=40.74(INVS NOT ATTAINEDS NOT ATTAI(- RECESSED PIPES)ASPHALT2' CONC CURBVACANT - NO BUFND 3/4" IPNO #N20°22'34 " W 2 5 0 . 0 4 ' M E A S ASPHALT WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW8" DIWATER MAIN596594599597595593491490489488446443445444437173134131268267260258257256253235226172147146142145140143138141139137136135132133130129127128126125123124122121119117116115114111 113110112 109107 108106105 8583806768656664915905831"=30'2817-107_Plans.dwgOVERALL MASTER SITE PLANC-5A65127 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 200Orlando, FL 32809Phone: 407-895-0324Fax: 407-895-0325www.feg-inc.usDESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY APPROVED BYPROJECT NO.SCALEDATESHEET NO.SHEET OF17-107JUNE 20, 2018FLORIDAENGINEERINGGROUPEngineering the FutureFEGSJSTHIS ITEM HAS BEENELECTRONICALLY SIGNED ANDSEALED BY (ENGINEER), P.E. ON(DATE) USING A DIGITAL SIGNATURE.PRINTED COPIES OF THISDOCUMENT ARE NOT CONSIDEREDSIGNED AND SEALED AND THESIGNATURE MUST BE VERIFIED ONANY ELECTRONIC COPIES.SAM J. SEBAALI, P.E.LICENSE NO. 42075FLORIDA ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.CERTIFICATE No. EB-0006595FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANWINTER SPRINGS MEDICAL OFFICEORLANDO, FLORIDAEAST STATE ROAD 434JT SJS SJSDATE REVISIONS BYCHECKED187 188 35S17°21'23"E 173.47' DESC S02°06'02"E57.01' DESCS09°26'16"ECURVE DATAΔ = 04°09'03"R = 1330.00'L = 96.35'CHORDN74°43'06"E96.33' DESCN67°33'14"E96.36' MEASCURVE DATAΔ = 04°09'03"R = 1580.00'L = 114.46'CHORDS74°43'08"W114.44' DESCS67°37'58"W114.37' MEASN72°38'37"E34.00' DESCN65°05'47"E34.06' MEASS17°21'23"E21.40' DESCS24°31'33"E21.40' MEASPARCEL: 34-20-30-5MD-OC00-0000OWNER: HACIENDA VILLAGE CO-OP INCORB 2799, PG 58957.10' MEASE STATE ROAD 434(R/W WIDTH VARIES)R/W MAP SECTION 77580-2610PARCEL: 3 4 - 2 0 - 3 0 - 5 A W - 0 0 0 0 - 0 4 8 D OWNER: C O V A R R U B I A & P I N T O LUISA 22 C A L L E S A N I G A N C I O ORB 8713 , P G 1 1 2 6UPEBFHSDUPUPUPN65°28'27"E 759.75' MEASN72°38'37"E 759.88' DESCS72°38'37"W 808.88' DESCS65°27'46"W 808.87' MEASS17°21'23"E 173.60' DESCS24°29'37"E 173.57' MEAS N13°12'20 " W 2 5 0 . 0 0 ' D E S C N20°22'34" W 2 5 0 . 0 4 ' M E A S S3257.01 D S39°44'52 E 57.29' MEAS D D D D DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD D S S SHACIENDA DRIVE (R/W WIDTH VARIES)PARCEL: 34-20-30-5MD-OC00-0000OWNER: HACIENDA VILLAGE CO-OP INCORB 2799, PG 589OW OWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOW31.632.033.036.337.435.5 34.237.336.9 38.034.535.733.631.8 37.639.240.940.539.840.339.042.4338.142.3641.0633.3 41.5337.041.4935.635.642.0535.535.635.638.539.237.138.940.241.46642.4841.2937.7437.3740.9742.0238.1241.5541.0440.9641.2941.0 2 40.9041.3941.4240.9940.5940.2040.5839.4239.9439.5739.2338.9038.8738.6138.5638.3838.2438.7438.5638.2437.9037.8133.032.631.933.87 36.033.12 35.237.938.3234.533.232.132.233.69 32.634.035.035.035.534.736.436.935.735.435.937.136.836.436.937.737.838.438.736.236.236.637.338.538.638.836.137.936.639.4038.538.842.038.737.239.8439.440.0839.242.140.5440.740.740.040.8741.1239.541.2138.538.9335.135.9 37.938.737.237.338.038.237.7 35.51 33.633.536.27 34.8 3734.8636.335.435.9 34.13 34.0437.833.6036.436.532.81 37.835.433.4733.4133.7336.337.739.433.5934.5034.4735.18 33.735.538.134.234.635.69 35.436.56 36.47 38.537.539.737.17 39.636.91 35.637.12 34.635.339.842.439.9.342.734.33433.833.133.5 33.635.235 52.4792741.9142.6442.7942.7642.8442.8042.8041.7242.2841.7642.4741.2841.4041.1941.9341.5141.8241.2041.7241.5540.9741.4441.4341.0240.8140.5540.8840.9840.6539.9640.3139.8840.3039.5940.3639.9639.6139.1739.6338.7739.1839.2438.9438.5738.4838.1138.0437.237.6637.37.7737.7838.0037.7838.083738.0438.2837.9738.6638.2137.9938.3238.5738.7738.7538.9438.6438.4638.4438.3438.4739.2438.9438.9139.0439.2338.6638.7339.3439.0038.5739.0139.4039.6439.4239.5839.1739.5539.9139.8739.6739.7139.6239.3139.4440.1640.4740.0640.1040.7240.6440.453641.0339.233737.737.1837.3737.2237.10 36.21 34.82 3535.56 34.2734.27 S33.83 33.3333.74 32.9533.05 32.9533.00 FND 4"X4" CMNO #33.53FND N&DLB #35564133.7334.3234.2435.14 3835.28 35.0135.7035.72 35.5636.46 33.9336.76 36.5836.686.92 36.14 S72°38'37"W30.00' DESCS65°21'30"W30.09' MEAS133.4'414039383634363534333435363732333533363838 383736353433TOP=42.30NE INV=32.70NW INV=33.00SW INV=32.9533TOP=39.30BOTTOM=32.40(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=37.99BOTTOM=31.29(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)34 35TOP=37.98BOTTOM=32.38(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=39.23BOTTOM=32.93(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)35TOP=40.74(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)35ASPHALTASPHALTASPHALT36ASPHALT37ASPHALT38ASPHALT 39ASPHALT ASPHALT 40402' CONC CURB2' CONC CURB402' CONC CURRB2' CONC CURB392' CONC CURB8" CONC CURB 398" CONC CURB 39CBWCW39CWCW363735TOP=33.49NE INV=26.84(6" CLAY)SE INV=26.95(6" CLAY)SW INV=26.90(6" CLAY)TOP=32.00NE INV=25.33(6" CLAY)NW INV=26.00(6" CLAY)SE INV=25.20(6" CLAY)3637393840414141VACANT - NO BUILDINGSNO #FND 1-1/4" IPNO #FND 5/8" IRNO #SET 1/2" IRLB #4475FND 3/4" IPNO #FND 3/4" IP NO # FND N&DLB #3556FND 1-1/4" IPLS #2005FND 1-1/4" IPLS #2005N20°22'34 " W 2 5 0 . 0 4 ' M E A S MEASASPHALT 41.0841.42.7241.7741.8741.7041.6141.37BOREHOLE #8BOREHOLE #7BOREHOLE #6BOREHOLE #5BOREHOLE #13BOREHOLE #14BOREHOLE #3BOREHOLE #10BOREHOLE #1BOREHOLE #2BOREHOLE #12BOREHOLE #4BOREHOLE #9BOREHOLE #1139.337.936.636.737.237.738.636.035.435.536.635.033.432.5DATUM = NAVD 88SITE BENCH M A R K # 1BENCHMARK N&DSITE BENCHMARK #2ELEVATION = 38.55ELEVATION = 4 2 . 7 1 BENCHMA R K N & DFH DATUM = N A V D 8 8WATER MAINWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW8" DI596594599597595593491490489488446443445444437173134131268267260258257256253235226172147146142145140143138141139137136135132133130129127128126125123124122121119117116115114111 113110112 109107 108106105 858380676865666491590583WATER MAIN8" DI596594599597595593491490489488446443445444437173134131268267260258257256253235226172147146142145140143138141139137136135132133130129127128126125123124122121119117116115114111 113110112 109107 108106105 8583806768656664915905831"=30'2817-107_Plans.dwgMASTER PAVING GRADING ANDDRAINAGE PLANC-5A185127 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 200Orlando, FL 32809Phone: 407-895-0324Fax: 407-895-0325www.feg-inc.usDESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY APPROVED BYPROJECT NO.SCALEDATESHEET NO.SHEET OF17-107JUNE 20, 2018FLORIDAENGINEERINGGROUPEngineering the FutureFEGSJSTHIS ITEM HAS BEENELECTRONICALLY SIGNED ANDSEALED BY (ENGINEER), P.E. ON(DATE) USING A DIGITAL SIGNATURE.PRINTED COPIES OF THISDOCUMENT ARE NOT CONSIDEREDSIGNED AND SEALED AND THESIGNATURE MUST BE VERIFIED ONANY ELECTRONIC COPIES.SAM J. SEBAALI, P.E.LICENSE NO. 42075FLORIDA ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.CERTIFICATE No. EB-0006595FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANWINTER SPRINGS MEDICAL OFFICEORLANDO, FLORIDAEAST STATE ROAD 434JT SJS SJSDATE REVISIONS BYCHECKED189 35S17°21'23"E 173.47' DESC S02°06'02"E57.01' DESCS09°26'16"ECURVE DATAΔ = 04°09'03"R = 1330.00'L = 96.35'CHORDN74°43'06"E96.33' DESCN67°33'14"E96.36' MEASCURVE DATAΔ = 04°09'03"R = 1580.00'L = 114.46'CHORDS74°43'08"W114.44' DESCS67°37'58"W114.37' MEASN72°38'37"E34.00' DESCN65°05'47"E34.06' MEASS17°21'23"E21.40' DESCS24°31'33"E21.40' MEASPARCEL: 34-20-30-5MD-OC00-0000OWNER: HACIENDA VILLAGE CO-OP INCORB 2799, PG 58957.10' MEASE STATE ROAD 434(R/W WIDTH VARIES)R/W MAP SECTION 77580-2610PARCEL: 3 4 - 2 0 - 3 0 - 5 A W - 0 0 0 0 - 0 4 8 D OWNER: C O V A R R U B I A & P I N T O LUISA 22 C A L L E S A N I G A N C I O ORB 8713 , P G 1 1 2 6UPEBFHSDUPUPUPN65°28'27"E 759.75' MEASN72°38'37"E 759.88' DESCS72°38'37"W 808.88' DESCS65°27'46"W 808.87' MEASS17°21'23"E 173.60' DESCS24°29'37"E 173.57' MEAS N13°12'20 " W 2 5 0 . 0 0 ' D E S C N20°22'34" W 2 5 0 . 0 4 ' M E A S S3257.01 D S39°44'52 E 57.29' MEAS D D D D DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD D S S SHACIENDA DRIVE (R/W WIDTH VARIES)PARCEL: 34-20-30-5MD-OC00-0000OWNER: HACIENDA VILLAGE CO-OP INCORB 2799, PG 589OW OWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWSFND 4"X4" CMNO #FND N&DLB #3556S72°38'37"W30.00' DESCS65°21'30"W30.09' MEAS133.4'TOP=42.30NE INV=32.70NW INV=33.00SW INV=32.95TOP=39.30BOTTOM=32.40(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=37.99BOTTOM=31.29(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=37.98BOTTOM=32.38(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=39.23BOTTOM=32.93(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=40.74(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)ASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALT ASPHALT ASPHALT 2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURB8" CONC CURB8" CONC CURBCBW CWCWCWTOP=33.49NE INV=26.84(6" CLAY)SE INV=26.95(6" CLAY)SW INV=26.90(6" CLAY)TOP=32.00NE INV=25.33(6" CLAY)NW INV=26.00(6" CLAY)SE INV=25.20(6" CLAY)VACANT - NO BUILDINGSFND 1-1/4" IPNO #FND 5/8" IRNO #SET 1/2" IRLB #4475FND 3/4" IPNO #FND 3/4" IP NO # FND N&DLB #3556FND 1-1/4" IPLS #2005FND 1-1/4" IPLS #2005N20°22'34 " W 2 5 0 . 0 4 ' M E A S MEASASPHALTDATUM = NAVD 88SITE BENCH M A R K # 1BENCHMARK N&DSITE BENCHMARK #2ELEVATION = 38.55ELEVATION = 4 2 . 7 1 BENCHMA R K N & DFH DATUM = N A V D 8 8WATER MAINWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW8" DI596594599597595593491490489488446443445444437173134131268267260258257256253235226172147146142145140143138141139137136135132133130129127128126125123124122121119117116115114111 113110112 109107 108106105 858380676865666491590583WATER MAIN8" DI596594599597595593491490489488446443445444437173134131268267260258257256253235226172147146142145140143138141139137136135132133130129127128126125123124122121119117116115114111 113110112 109107 108106105 858380676865666491590583DDDDDDDOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOW9.60.7INEDPIPES)WWWWW1"=30'2817-107_Plans.dwgMASTER UTILITY PLANC-5A295127 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 200Orlando, FL 32809Phone: 407-895-0324Fax: 407-895-0325www.feg-inc.usDESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY APPROVED BYPROJECT NO.SCALEDATESHEET NO.SHEET OF17-107JUNE 20, 2018FLORIDAENGINEERINGGROUPEngineering the FutureFEGSJSTHIS ITEM HAS BEENELECTRONICALLY SIGNED ANDSEALED BY (ENGINEER), P.E. ON(DATE) USING A DIGITAL SIGNATURE.PRINTED COPIES OF THISDOCUMENT ARE NOT CONSIDEREDSIGNED AND SEALED AND THESIGNATURE MUST BE VERIFIED ONANY ELECTRONIC COPIES.SAM J. SEBAALI, P.E.LICENSE NO. 42075FLORIDA ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.CERTIFICATE No. EB-0006595FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANWINTER SPRINGS MEDICAL OFFICEORLANDO, FLORIDAEAST STATE ROAD 434JT SJS SJSDATE REVISIONS BYCHECKED190 35S17°21'23"E 173.47' DESC S02°06'02"E57.01' DESCS09°26'16"ECURVE DATAΔ = 04°09'03"R = 1330.00'L = 96.35'CHORDN74°43'06"E96.33' DESCN67°33'14"E96.36' MEASCURVE DATAΔ = 04°09'03"R = 1580.00'L = 114.46'CHORDS74°43'08"W114.44' DESCS67°37'58"W114.37' MEASN72°38'37"E34.00' DESCN65°05'47"E34.06' MEASS17°21'23"E21.40' DESCS24°31'33"E21.40' MEASPARCEL: 34-20-30-5MD-OC00-0000OWNER: HACIENDA VILLAGE CO-OP INCORB 2799, PG 58957.10' MEASE STATE ROAD 434(R/W WIDTH VARIES)R/W MAP SECTION 77580-2610PARCEL: 3 4 - 2 0 - 3 0 - 5 A W - 0 0 0 0 - 0 4 8 D OWNER: C O V A R R U B I A & P I N T O LUISA 22 C A L L E S A N I G A N C I O ORB 8713 , P G 1 1 2 6UPEBFHSDUPUPUPN65°28'27"E 759.75' MEASN72°38'37"E 759.88' DESCS72°38'37"W 808.88' DESCS65°27'46"W 808.87' MEASS17°21'23"E 173.60' DESCS24°29'37"E 173.57' MEAS N13°12'20 " W 2 5 0 . 0 0 ' D E S C N20°22'34" W 2 5 0 . 0 4 ' M E A S S3257.01 D S39°44'52 E 57.29' MEASSS SHACIENDA DRIVE (R/W WIDTH VARIES)PARCEL: 34-20-30-5MD-OC00-0000OWNER: HACIENDA VILLAGE CO-OP INCORB 2799, PG 589OW OWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWSFND 4"X4" CMNO #FND N&DLB #3556S72°38'37"W30.00' DESCS65°21'30"W30.09' MEAS133.4'TOP=42.30NE INV=32.70NW INV=33.00SW INV=32.95TOP=39.30BOTTOM=32.40(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=37.99BOTTOM=31.29(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=37.98BOTTOM=32.38(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=39.23BOTTOM=32.93(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=40.74(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)ASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALT ASPHALT ASPHALT 2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURRB2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURB8" CONC CURB8" CONC CURBCBW CWCWCWTOP=33.49NE INV=26.84(6" CLAY)SE INV=26.95(6" CLAY)SW INV=26.90(6" CLAY)TOP=32.00NE INV=25.33(6" CLAY)NW INV=26.00(6" CLAY)SE INV=25.20(6" CLAY)VACANT - NO BUILDINGSNO #FND 1-1/4" IPNO #FND 5/8" IRNO #SET 1/2" IRLB #4475FND 3/4" IPNO #FND 3/4" IP NO # FND N&DLB #3556FND 1-1/4" IPLS #2005FND 1-1/4" IPLS #2005N20°22'34 " W 2 5 0 . 0 4 ' M E A S MEASASPHALTDATUM = NAVD 88SITE BENCH M A R K # 1BENCHMARK N&DSITE BENCHMARK #2ELEVATION = 38.55ELEVATION = 4 2 . 7 1 BENCHMA R K N & DFH DATUM = N A V D 8 8WATER MAINWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW8" DIWATER MAIN8" DI596594599597595593491490489488446443445444437173134131268267260258257256253235226172147146142145140143138141139137136135132133130129127128126125123124122121119117116115114111 113110112 109107 108106105 8583806768656664915905831"=30'2817-107_Plans.dwgSITE GEOMETRY PLAN - PHASE IC-5B105127 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 200Orlando, FL 32809Phone: 407-895-0324Fax: 407-895-0325www.feg-inc.usDESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY APPROVED BYPROJECT NO.SCALEDATESHEET NO.SHEET OF17-107JUNE 20, 2018FLORIDAENGINEERINGGROUPEngineering the FutureFEGSJSTHIS ITEM HAS BEENELECTRONICALLY SIGNED ANDSEALED BY (ENGINEER), P.E. ON(DATE) USING A DIGITAL SIGNATURE.PRINTED COPIES OF THISDOCUMENT ARE NOT CONSIDEREDSIGNED AND SEALED AND THESIGNATURE MUST BE VERIFIED ONANY ELECTRONIC COPIES.SAM J. SEBAALI, P.E.LICENSE NO. 42075FLORIDA ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.CERTIFICATE No. EB-0006595FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANWINTER SPRINGS MEDICAL OFFICEORLANDO, FLORIDAEAST STATE ROAD 434JT SJS SJSDATE REVISIONS BYCHECKED191 00'E STATE ROAD 434(R/W WIDTH VARIES)R/W MAP SECTION 77580-2610EBDUPUPN65°28'27"E 759.75' MEASN72°38'37"E 759.88' DESCD D DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD D OWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWTOP=42.30NE INV=32.70NW INV=33.00SW INV=32.95TOP=39.30BOTTOM=32.40(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=39.23BOTTOM=32.93(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=40.74(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)ASPHALTASPHALTASPHALT2' CONC CURBCWFND 3/4" IPNO #DATUM = NAVD 88BENCHMARK N&SITE BENCHMARELEVATION = 38.5WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWL259191N.T.S.2817-107_Plans.dwgSITE GEOMETRY NOTES - PHASE IC-5C115127 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 200Orlando, FL 32809Phone: 407-895-0324Fax: 407-895-0325www.feg-inc.usDESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY APPROVED BYPROJECT NO.SCALEDATESHEET NO.SHEET OF17-107JUNE 20, 2018FLORIDAENGINEERINGGROUPEngineering the FutureFEGSJSTHIS ITEM HAS BEENELECTRONICALLY SIGNED ANDSEALED BY (ENGINEER), P.E. ON(DATE) USING A DIGITAL SIGNATURE.PRINTED COPIES OF THISDOCUMENT ARE NOT CONSIDEREDSIGNED AND SEALED AND THESIGNATURE MUST BE VERIFIED ONANY ELECTRONIC COPIES.SAM J. SEBAALI, P.E.LICENSE NO. 42075FLORIDA ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.CERTIFICATE No. EB-0006595FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANWINTER SPRINGS MEDICAL OFFICEORLANDO, FLORIDAEAST STATE ROAD 434JT SJS SJSDATE REVISIONS BYCHECKEDSITE GEOMETRY NOTES - PHASEI5127 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 200Orlando, FL 32809FLORIDAENGINEERINGFEGFINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANWINTERSPRINGS MEDICAL OFFICEF192 35S17°21'23"E 173.47' DESC S02°06'02"E57.01' DESCS09°26'16"ECURVE DATAΔ = 04°09'03"R = 1330.00'L = 96.35'CHORDN74°43'06"E96.33' DESCN67°33'14"E96.36' MEASCURVE DATAΔ = 04°09'03"R = 1580.00'L = 114.46'CHORDS74°43'08"W114.44' DESCS67°37'58"W114.37' MEASN72°38'37"E34.00' DESCN65°05'47"E34.06' MEASS17°21'23"E21.40' DESCS24°31'33"E21.40' MEASPARCEL: 34-20-30-5MD-OC00-0000OWNER: HACIENDA VILLAGE CO-OP INCORB 2799, PG 58957.10' MEASE STATE ROAD 434(R/W WIDTH VARIES)R/W MAP SECTION 77580-2610PARCEL: 3 4 - 2 0 - 3 0 - 5 A W - 0 0 0 0 - 0 4 8 D OWNER: C O V A R R U B I A & P I N T O LUISA 22 C A L L E S A N I G A N C I O ORB 8713 , P G 1 1 2 6UPEBFHSDUPUPUPN65°28'27"E 759.75' MEASN72°38'37"E 759.88' DESCS72°38'37"W 808.88' DESCS65°27'46"W 808.87' MEASS17°21'23"E 173.60' DESCS24°29'37"E 173.57' MEAS N13°12'20 " W 2 5 0 . 0 0 ' D E S C N20°22'34" W 2 5 0 . 0 4 ' M E A S S3257.01 D S39°44'52 E 57.29' MEASSS SHACIENDA DRIVE (R/W WIDTH VARIES)PARCEL: 34-20-30-5MD-OC00-0000OWNER: HACIENDA VILLAGE CO-OP INCORB 2799, PG 589OW OWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWSFND 4"X4" CMNO #FND N&DLB #3556S72°38'37"W30.00' DESCS65°21'30"W30.09' MEAS133.4'TOP=42.30NE INV=32.70NW INV=33.00SW INV=32.95TOP=39.30BOTTOM=32.40(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=37.99BOTTOM=31.29(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=37.98BOTTOM=32.38(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=39.23BOTTOM=32.93(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=40.74(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)ASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALT ASPHALT ASPHALT 2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURRB2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURB8" CONC CURB8" CONC CURBCBW CWCWCWTOP=33.49NE INV=26.84(6" CLAY)SE INV=26.95(6" CLAY)SW INV=26.90(6" CLAY)TOP=32.00NE INV=25.33(6" CLAY)NW INV=26.00(6" CLAY)SE INV=25.20(6" CLAY)VACANT - NO BUILDINGSNO #FND 1-1/4" IPNO #FND 5/8" IRNO #SET 1/2" IRLB #4475FND 3/4" IPNO #FND 3/4" IP NO # FND N&DLB #3556FND 1-1/4" IPLS #2005FND 1-1/4" IPLS #2005N20°22'34 " W 2 5 0 . 0 4 ' M E A S MEASASPHALTDATUM = NAVD 88SITE BENCH M A R K # 1BENCHMARK N&DSITE BENCHMARK #2ELEVATION = 38.55ELEVATION = 4 2 . 7 1 BENCHMA R K N & DFH DATUM = N A V D 8 8WATER MAINWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW8" DIWETLANDWETLANDFLAGGED BYBIO - TECHWETLANDWETLANDFLAGGED BYBIO - TECHWL 1829WL 1828WL 1827WL 1827WL 1825WL NO#WL 1284WL 1823WL 1812WL 1838WL 1837WL 1785WL 1821WL 1787WL 1788WL 1789WL 1775WL 1776WL 1777WL 1778WL 1779WL 1780WL 1781WL 1782WL 1783WL 1784L1L2L3L4L5L6 L7L8L9L10L11L12L14L16L17L18L19L22 L23 L24L25L26L27 L28L29L30L31L32L20L21L13WL 1779AL15WETLANDWETLANDFLAGGED BYBIO - TECHWETLANDWETLANDFLAGGED BYBIO - TECHWL 1829WL 1828WL 1827WL 1827WL 1825WL NO#WL 1284WL 1823WL 1812WL 1838WL 1837WL 1785WL 1821WL 1787WL 1788WL 1789WL 1775WL 1776WL 1777WL 1778WL 1779WL 1780WL 1781WL 1782WL 1783WL 1784WL 1779AWATER MAIN8" DI5127 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 200Orlando, FL 32809Phone: 407-895-0324Fax: 407-895-0325www.feg-inc.usDESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY APPROVED BYPROJECT NO.SCALEDATESHEET NO.SHEET OF17-107JUNE 20, 2018FLORIDAENGINEERINGGROUPEngineering the FutureFEGSJSTHIS ITEM HAS BEENELECTRONICALLY SIGNED ANDSEALED BY (ENGINEER), P.E. ON(DATE) USING A DIGITAL SIGNATURE.PRINTED COPIES OF THISDOCUMENT ARE NOT CONSIDEREDSIGNED AND SEALED AND THESIGNATURE MUST BE VERIFIED ONANY ELECTRONIC COPIES.SAM J. SEBAALI, P.E.LICENSE NO. 42075FLORIDA ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.CERTIFICATE No. EB-0006595FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANWINTER SPRINGS MEDICAL OFFICEORLANDO, FLORIDAEAST STATE ROAD 434JT SJS SJSDATE REVISIONS BYCHECKED1"=30'2817-107_WetlandImpact.dwgSITE WETLAND IMPACTC-5D12193 N72°38'37"E129.75' DESCN65°27'28"E129.73' MEASS72°38'37"W35.75' DESCS17°21'23"E 173.47' DESC S02°06'02"E57.01' DESCS09°26'16"EPARCEL: 34-20-30-5MD-OC00-0000OWNER: HACIENDA VILLAGE CO-OP INCORB 2799, PG 58957.10' MEASE STATE ROAD 434(R/W WIDTH VARIES)R/W MAP SECTION 77580-2610PARCEL: 34-2 0 - 3 0 - 5 A W - 0 0 0 0 - 0 4 8 D OWNER: COV A R R U B I A & P I N T O LUISA 22 CAL L E S A N I G A N C I O ORB 8713, PG 1 1 2 6SDSSHACIENDA DRIVE (R/W WIDTH VARIES)PARCEL: 34-20-30-5MD-OC00-0000OWNER: HACIENDA VILLAGE CO-OP INCORB 2799, PG 589 SFND 4"X4" CMNO #FND N&DLB #3556S72°38'37"W30.00' DESCS65°21'30"W30.09' MEAS133.4'TOP=42.30NE INV=32 . 70 NW INV=3 3 .00SW INV=3 2.95 TOP=3 9 . 3 0 BOTTOM=32.40(INVS N O T A T T A I N E D - RECE S S E D P I P E S )TOP=37.99BOTTOM=31.29(INVS NOT ATTAINED - RECESSED PIPES)TOP=37.20BOTTOM=30.90(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=36.70BOTTOM=30.70(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=37.23BOTTOM=33.73(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=3 7 . 9 8 BOTTOM = 3 2 . 3 8 (INVS N O T A T T A I N E D - RECE S S E D P I P E S )TOP=39.23BOTTOM=32.93(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=40.74(INVS NOT ATT AINED - RECESSED PIPES )ASPHAL TASPHALTASPHALT ASPHA LTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALT ASPHALT ASPHALT2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURB 2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURB 2' CONC CURB8" CONC CURB8" CONC CURBCBW CWCWCW TOP=33.49NE INV=26.84(6" CLAY)SE INV=26.95(6" CLAY)SW INV=26.90(6" CLAY)TOP=32.00NE INV=25.33(6" CLAY)NW INV=26.00(6" CLAY)SE INV=25.20(6" CLAY)VACANT - NO BUILDINGSFND 5/8" IRNO #FND 1-1/4" IPNO #FND 1-1/4" IPNO #FND 5/8" IRNO #SET 1/2" IR LB #4475FND 3/4" I P NO # FND 3/4" IPNO #NW CORNER OF PARCEL34-20-30-5AW-0000-048DFND 3/4" IP, NO #FND 5/8" IRNO #FND N&DLB #3556FND 1-1/4" IPLS #2005FND 1-1/4" IPLS #2005 SW C O R N E R O F P A R C E L 34-20- 3 0 - 5 A W - 0 0 0 0 - 0 4 8 D N74°18'58"E 219.66' MEASN20°22'34"W 2 5 0 . 0 4 ' M E A S S72°12'28"W 142.50' MEASASPHALTS17°21'23"E21.53' DESCS25°04'38"E21.50' MEASDATU M = N A V D 8 8 SITE BENCHMAR K # 1 ELEVATION = 37.07SITE BENCHMARK #3BENCHMARK N&DBENCHMARK N&DDATUM = NAVD 88 SITE BENCHMARK #2ELEV A T I O N = 3 8 . 5 5 ELEVATION = 42.7 1BENCHMARK N&DFH DATUM = NAVD 8 8WATER MAIN8" DIWATER MAIN8" DIN72°38'37"E129.75' DESCN65°27'28"E129.73' MEASS72°38'37"W35.75' DESCS17°21'23"E 1 7 3 . 4 7 ' D E S C S02°06'02"E57.01' DESCS09°26'16"EPARCEL: 34-20-30-5MD-OC00-0000OWNER: HACIENDA VILLAGE CO-OP INCORB 2799, PG 58957.10' MEASE STATE ROAD 434(R/W WIDTH VARIES)R/W MAP SECTION 77580-2610PARCEL: 34-20- 3 0 - 5 A W - 0 0 0 0 - 0 4 8 D OWNER: COVA R R U B I A & P I N T O LUISA 22 CALLE S A N I G A N CI O ORB 8713, PG 11 2 6SDSS HACIENDA D R I V E (R/W WIDT H V A R I E S ) PARCEL: 34-2 0- 3 0 - 5 M D - O C 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 OWNER: HACIE N D A V I L L A G E C O - O P I N C ORB 2799, P G 5 8 9 S FND 4"X4" CMNO #FND N & D LB #35 5 6 S72°38'37"W30.00 ' D E S C S65°21'30"W30.09' MEAS133.4' TOP=42. 3 0 NE INV= 32.70NW INV=33.00SW INV=32.95TOP=39.30BOTTOM=32.40(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=37. 99 BOTTOM=31.2 9 (INVS N OT AT TAINED - RECES SED P I PES)TOP=37.20BOTTOM=30.90(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=36.70BOTTOM=30.70(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=37.23BOTTOM=33.73(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=37.98BOTTOM=32.38(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=39.23BOTTOM=32.93(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=40.7 4 (INVS NOT A TTAINED - RECESS ED PIP E S)ASPHALT ASPHA LTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALT ASPHALT ASPHALT ASPHALT 2' CONC CURB 2' CONC C URB2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURB 2' CONC CURB 8" CONC CURB 8" CONC CURB CBW CWCWCWTOP=3 3 . 4 9 NE IN V = 2 6 . 8 4 ( 6 " C L A Y ) SE IN V = 2 6 . 9 5 ( 6 " C L A Y ) SW IN V = 2 6 . 9 0 ( 6 " C L A Y )TOP=32.00NE INV=25.33(6" CLAY)NW INV=26.00(6" CLAY)SE INV=25.20(6" CLAY)VACANT - NO BUILDINGSFND 5/8" IRNO #FND 1- 1 / 4 " I P NO #FND 1-1/4" IPNO #FND 5/8" I R NO # SET 1 / 2" IRLB #4475 FND 3/4 " IP NO # FND 3/4" IP NO # NW C O R N E R O F P A R C E L 34-20 - 3 0 - 5 A W - 0 0 0 0 - 0 4 8 D FND 3 / 4 " I P , N O # FND 5 / 8 " I R NO # FND N&DLB #3556 FND 1-1/4" IPLS #2005FND 1-1/4" IPLS #2005SW CORNER OF PARCEL34-20-30-5AW-0000-048DN74°18'58"E 219.66' MEASN20°22'34"W 2 5 0 . 0 4 ' M E A S S72°12'28"W 142.50' MEASASPHALTS17°21'23"E21.53' DESCS25°04'38"E21.50' MEASDATUM = NAVD 88SITE BENCHMARK # 1ELEVATION = 37.07SITE BENCHMARK #3BENC H M A R K N & D BENCHMARK N&DDATUM = NAVD 88SITE BENCHMARK #2ELEVATION = 38.55ELEVATION = 42.71BENCHMARK N&DFH DATUM = NAVD 88WATER MAIN8" DI596594 599597595593 491 490489488446 443445444 437 173134131268267260258257 256253 235226172 147146142145140143 138 141139137136135 132133130129 127 128126 125123124122121119 117 116 115 114 111 113110 112 109 107108 106105 85838067 68 65 666491 590583WATER MAIN8" DIN72°38'37"E129.75' DESCN65°27'28"E129.73' MEASS72°38'37"W35.75' DESCS17°21'23"E 1 7 3 . 4 7 ' D E S C S02°06'02"E57.01' DESCS09°26'16"EPARCEL: 34-20-30-5MD-OC00-0000OWNER: HACIENDA VILLAGE CO-OP INCORB 2799, PG 58957.10' MEASE STATE ROAD 434(R/W WIDTH VARIES)R/W MAP SECTION 77580-2610PARCEL: 34-20- 3 0 - 5 A W - 0 0 0 0 - 0 4 8 D OWNER: COVA R R U B I A & P I N T O LUISA 22 CALLE S A N I G A N C I O ORB 8713, PG 11 2 6 S DSS HACIENDA D R I V E (R/W WIDT H V A RI E S ) PARCEL: 34-2 0 - 3 0 - 5 M D- O C 0 0- 0 0 0 0 OWNER: HACIE N D A V I L L A G E C O - O P I N C ORB 2799, P G 5 8 9 SFND 4 " X 4 " C M NO #FND N&DLB #3556S72°38'37"W30.00' DESCS65°21'30"W30.09' MEAS133.4'TOP=42.30NE INV=32.70NW INV=33.0 0 SW INV=32.9 5TOP=39.30BOTTOM=32.40(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=3 7 .99 BOTTOM=31 . 29 (INVS NOT A TTAINED - REC ESSED P IPES) TOP=3 7 . 2 0 BOTT O M = 3 0 . 9 0 (INVS N O T A T T A I N E D - REC E S S E D P I P E S ) TOP=3 6 . 7 0 BOTTO M = 3 0 . 7 0 (INVS N O T A T T A I N E D - REC E S S E D P I P E S ) TOP= 3 7 . 2 3 BOTT O M = 3 3 . 7 3 (INVS N O T A T T A I N E D - REC E S S E D P I P E S )TOP=37.98BOTTOM=32.38(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=3 9 . 2 3 BOTT O M = 3 2 . 9 3 (INVS N O T A T T A I N E D - REC E S S E D P I P E S )TOP=40 .74(INVS NOT ATTAINED - RECES SED PI PES)ASPHALTASPHALTASPHAL TASPHALTASPHALTASPHAL T ASPHA LT ASPHALT ASPHALT ASPHALT 2' CON C CUR B 2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURB2' CONC CU R B2' CONC CURB 2' CONC CURB 8" CONC CURB 8" CONC CURB CBW CWCWCWTOP=33.49NE INV=26.84(6" CLAY)SE INV=26.95(6" CLAY)SW INV=26.90(6" CLAY)TOP=32.00NE INV=25.33(6" CLAY)NW INV=26.00(6" CLAY)SE INV=25.20(6" CLAY)VACANT - NO BUILDINGSFND 5/8" IRNO #FND 1-1/4" IPNO #FND 1-1/4" IPNO #FND 5/8" IR NO #SET 1/2" IRLB #4475 FND 3 / 4" IPNO #FND 3/4" IP NO #NW CORNER OF PARCEL34-20-30-5AW-0000-048DFND 3/4" IP, NO #FND 5/8" IRNO #FND N&DLB #3556 FND 1-1/4" IPLS #2005FND 1-1/4" IPLS #2005SW CORNER OF PARCEL34-20-30-5AW-0000-048DN74°18'58"E 219.66' MEASN20°22'34"W 2 5 0 . 0 4 ' M E A S S72°12'28"W 142.50' MEASASPHALTS17°21'23"E21.53' DESCS25°04'38"E21.50' MEASDATUM = NAVD 88SITE BENCHMARK # 1ELEVATION = 37.07SITE BENCHMARK #3BENCHMARK N&DBENCHMARK N&DDATUM = NAVD 88SITE BENCHMARK #2ELEVATION = 38.55ELEVATION = 42.71BENCHMARK N&DFH DATUM = NAVD 88WATER MAIN8" DI596594 599 597595593 491490489488 446443445444 437173134131268267260258 257 256 253235226172147146142145140 143 138 141139137136 135 132133 130129127128 126125123 124122121 119 117116115114 111 113110 112 109 107108 106105 858380 67686566 64 91590583WATER MAIN8" DI1"=80'2817-107_AerialPlan.dwgOVERALL AERIAL ANDSIGHT LINE PLANC-5E135127 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 200Orlando, FL 32809Phone: 407-895-0324Fax: 407-895-0325www.feg-inc.usDESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY APPROVED BYPROJECT NO.SCALEDATESHEET NO.SHEET OF17-107JUNE 20, 2018FLORIDAENGINEERINGGROUPEngineering the FutureFEGSJSTHIS ITEM HAS BEENELECTRONICALLY SIGNED ANDSEALED BY (ENGINEER), P.E. ON(DATE) USING A DIGITAL SIGNATURE.PRINTED COPIES OF THISDOCUMENT ARE NOT CONSIDEREDSIGNED AND SEALED AND THESIGNATURE MUST BE VERIFIED ONANY ELECTRONIC COPIES.SAM J. SEBAALI, P.E.LICENSE NO. 42075FLORIDA ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.CERTIFICATE No. EB-0006595FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANWINTER SPRINGS MEDICAL OFFICEORLANDO, FLORIDAEAST STATE ROAD 434JT SJS SJSDATE REVISIONS BYCHECKED194 35S17°21'23"E 173.47' DESC S02°06'02"E57.01' DESCS09°26'16"ECURVE DATAΔ = 04°09'03"R = 1330.00'L = 96.35'CHORDN74°43'06"E96.33' DESCN67°33'14"E96.36' MEASCURVE DATAΔ = 04°09'03"R = 1580.00'L = 114.46'CHORDS74°43'08"W114.44' DESCS67°37'58"W114.37' MEASN72°38'37"E34.00' DESCN65°05'47"E34.06' MEASS17°21'23"E21.40' DESCS24°31'33"E21.40' MEASPARCEL: 34-20-30-5MD-OC00-0000OWNER: HACIENDA VILLAGE CO-OP INCORB 2799, PG 58957.10' MEASE STATE ROAD 434(R/W WIDTH VARIES)R/W MAP SECTION 77580-2610PARCEL: 3 4 - 2 0 - 3 0 - 5 A W - 0 0 0 0 - 0 4 8 D OWNER: C O V A R R U B I A & P I N T O LUISA 22 C A L L E S A N I G A N C I O ORB 8713 , P G 1 1 2 6UPEBFHSDUPUPUPN65°28'27"E 759.75' MEASN72°38'37"E 759.88' DESCS72°38'37"W 808.88' DESCS65°27'46"W 808.87' MEASS17°21'23"E 173.60' DESCS24°29'37"E 173.57' MEAS N13°12'20 " W 2 5 0 . 0 0 ' D E S C N20°22'34" W 2 5 0 . 0 4 ' M E A S S3257.01 D S39°44'52 E 57.29' MEAS D D D D DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD D S S SHACIENDA DRIVE (R/W WIDTH VARIES)PARCEL: 34-20-30-5MD-OC00-0000OWNER: HACIENDA VILLAGE CO-OP INCORB 2799, PG 589OW OWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOW31.632.033.036.337.435.5 34.237.336.9 38.034.535.733.631.8 37.639.240.940.539.840.339.042.4338.142.3641.0633.3 41.5337.041.4935.635.642.0535.535.635.638.539.237.138.940.241.46642.4841.2937.7437.3740.9742.0238.1241.5541.0440.9641.2941.0 2 40.9041.3941.4240.9940.5940.2040.5839.4239.9439.5739.2338.9038.8738.6138.5638.3838.2438.7438.5638.2437.9037.8133.032.631.933.87 36.033.12 35.237.938.3234.533.232.132.233.69 32.634.035.035.035.534.736.436.935.735.435.937.136.836.436.937.737.838.438.736.236.236.637.338.538.638.836.137.936.639.4038.538.842.038.737.239.8439.440.0839.242.140.5440.740.740.040.8741.1239.541.2138.538.9335.135.9 37.938.737.237.338.038.237.7 35.51 33.633.536.27 34.8 3734.8636.335.435.9 34.13 34.0437.833.6036.436.532.81 37.835.433.4733.4133.7336.337.739.433.5934.5034.4735.18 33.735.538.134.234.635.69 35.436.56 36.47 38.537.539.737.17 39.636.91 35.637.12 34.635.339.842.439.9.342.734.33433.833.133.5 33.635.235 52.4792741.9142.6442.7942.7642.8442.8042.8041.7242.2841.7642.4741.2841.4041.1941.9341.5141.8241.2041.7241.5540.9741.4441.4341.0240.8140.5540.8840.9840.6539.9640.3139.8840.3039.5940.3639.9639.6139.1739.6338.7739.1839.2438.9438.5738.4838.1138.0437.237.6637.37.7737.7838.0037.7838.083738.0438.2837.9738.6638.2137.9938.3238.5738.7738.7538.9438.6438.4638.4438.3438.4739.2438.9438.9139.0439.2338.6638.7339.3439.0038.5739.0139.4039.6439.4239.5839.1739.5539.9139.8739.6739.7139.6239.3139.4440.1640.4740.0640.1040.7240.6440.453641.0339.233737.737.1837.3737.2237.10 36.21 34.82 3535.56 34.2734.27 S33.83 33.3333.74 32.9533.05 32.9533.00 FND 4"X4" CMNO #33.53FND N&DLB #35564133.7334.3234.2435.14 3835.28 35.0135.7035.72 35.5636.46 33.9336.76 36.5836.686.92 36.14 S72°38'37"W30.00' DESCS65°21'30"W30.09' MEAS133.4'414039383634363534333435363732333533363838 383736353433TOP=42.30NE INV=32.70NW INV=33.00SW INV=32.9533TOP=39.30BOTTOM=32.40(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=37.99BOTTOM=31.29(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)34 35TOP=37.98BOTTOM=32.38(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=39.23BOTTOM=32.93(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)35TOP=40.74(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)35ASPHALTASPHALTASPHALT36ASPHALT37ASPHALT38ASPHALT 39ASPHALT ASPHALT 40402' CONC CURB2' CONC CURB402' CONC CURRB2' CONC CURB392' CONC CURB8" CONC CURB 398" CONC CURB 39CBWCW39CWCW363735TOP=33.49NE INV=26.84(6" CLAY)SE INV=26.95(6" CLAY)SW INV=26.90(6" CLAY)TOP=32.00NE INV=25.33(6" CLAY)NW INV=26.00(6" CLAY)SE INV=25.20(6" CLAY)3637393840414141VACANT - NO BUILDINGSNO #FND 1-1/4" IPNO #FND 5/8" IRNO #SET 1/2" IRLB #4475FND 3/4" IPNO #FND 3/4" IP NO # FND N&DLB #3556FND 1-1/4" IPLS #2005FND 1-1/4" IPLS #2005N20°22'34 " W 2 5 0 . 0 4 ' M E A S EASASPHALT 41.0841.42.7241.7741.8741.7041.6141.37BOREHOLE #8BOREHOLE #7BOREHOLE #6BOREHOLE #5BOREHOLE #13BOREHOLE #14BOREHOLE #3BOREHOLE #10BOREHOLE #1BOREHOLE #2BOREHOLE #12BOREHOLE #4BOREHOLE #9BOREHOLE #1139.337.936.636.737.237.738.636.035.435.536.635.033.432.5DATUM = NAVD 88SITE BENCH M A R K # 1BENCHMARK N&DSITE BENCHMARK #2ELEVATION = 38.55ELEVATION = 4 2 . 7 1 BENCHMA R K N & DFH DATUM = N A V D 8 8WATER MAINWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW8" DI596594599597595593491490489488446443445444437173134131268267260258257256253235226172147146142145140143138141139137136135132133130129127128126125123124122121119117116115114111 113110112 109107 108106105 858380676865666491590583WATER MAIN8" DI596594599597595593491490489488446443445444437173134131268267260258257256253235226172147146142145140143138141139137136135132133130129127128126125123124122121119117116115114111 113110112 109107 108106105 8583806768656664915905831"=30'2817-107_Plans.dwgSITE PAVING, GRADING ANDDRAINAGE PLAN - PHASE IC-6A145127 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 200Orlando, FL 32809Phone: 407-895-0324Fax: 407-895-0325www.feg-inc.usDESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY APPROVED BYPROJECT NO.SCALEDATESHEET NO.SHEET OF17-107JUNE 20, 2018FLORIDAENGINEERINGGROUPEngineering the FutureFEGSJSTHIS ITEM HAS BEENELECTRONICALLY SIGNED ANDSEALED BY (ENGINEER), P.E. ON(DATE) USING A DIGITAL SIGNATURE.PRINTED COPIES OF THISDOCUMENT ARE NOT CONSIDEREDSIGNED AND SEALED AND THESIGNATURE MUST BE VERIFIED ONANY ELECTRONIC COPIES.SAM J. SEBAALI, P.E.LICENSE NO. 42075FLORIDA ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.CERTIFICATE No. EB-0006595FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANWINTER SPRINGS MEDICAL OFFICEORLANDO, FLORIDAEAST STATE ROAD 434JT SJS SJSDATE REVISIONS BYCHECKED195 ”””””””””“”N.T.S.2817-107_Plans.dwgSITE PAVING, GRADING ANDDRAINAGE NOTES - PHASE IC-6B155127 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 200Orlando, FL 32809Phone: 407-895-0324Fax: 407-895-0325www.feg-inc.usDESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY APPROVED BYPROJECT NO.SCALEDATESHEET NO.SHEET OF17-107JUNE 20, 2018FLORIDAENGINEERINGGROUPEngineering the FutureFEGSJSTHIS ITEM HAS BEENELECTRONICALLY SIGNED ANDSEALED BY (ENGINEER), P.E. ON(DATE) USING A DIGITAL SIGNATURE.PRINTED COPIES OF THISDOCUMENT ARE NOT CONSIDEREDSIGNED AND SEALED AND THESIGNATURE MUST BE VERIFIED ONANY ELECTRONIC COPIES.SAM J. SEBAALI, P.E.LICENSE NO. 42075FLORIDA ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.CERTIFICATE No. EB-0006595FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANWINTER SPRINGS MEDICAL OFFICEORLANDO, FLORIDAEAST STATE ROAD 434JT SJS SJSDATE REVISIONS BYCHECKED196 35S17°21'23"E 173.47' DESC S02°06'02"E57.01' DESCS09°26'16"ECURVE DATAΔ = 04°09'03"R = 1330.00'L = 96.35'CHORDN74°43'06"E96.33' DESCN67°33'14"E96.36' MEASCURVE DATAΔ = 04°09'03"R = 1580.00'L = 114.46'CHORDS74°43'08"W114.44' DESCS67°37'58"W114.37' MEASN72°38'37"E34.00' DESCN65°05'47"E34.06' MEASS17°21'23"E21.40' DESCS24°31'33"E21.40' MEASPARCEL: 34-20-30-5MD-OC00-0000OWNER: HACIENDA VILLAGE CO-OP INCORB 2799, PG 58957.10' MEASE STATE ROAD 434(R/W WIDTH VARIES)R/W MAP SECTION 77580-2610PARCEL: 3 4 - 2 0 - 3 0 - 5 A W - 0 0 0 0 - 0 4 8 D OWNER: C O V A R R U B I A & P I N T O LUISA 22 C A L L E S A N I G A N C I O ORB 8713 , P G 1 1 2 6UPEBFHSDUPUPUPN65°28'27"E 759.75' MEASN72°38'37"E 759.88' DESCS72°38'37"W 808.88' DESCS65°27'46"W 808.87' MEASS17°21'23"E 173.60' DESCS24°29'37"E 173.57' MEAS N13°12'20 " W 2 5 0 . 0 0 ' D E S C N20°22'34" W 2 5 0 . 0 4 ' M E A S S3257.01 D S39°44'52 E 57.29' MEAS D D D D DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD D S S SHACIENDA DRIVE (R/W WIDTH VARIES)PARCEL: 34-20-30-5MD-OC00-0000OWNER: HACIENDA VILLAGE CO-OP INCORB 2799, PG 589OW OWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWSFND 4"X4" CMNO #FND N&DLB #3556S72°38'37"W30.00' DESCS65°21'30"W30.09' MEAS133.4'TOP=42.30NE INV=32.70NW INV=33.00SW INV=32.95TOP=39.30BOTTOM=32.40(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=37.99BOTTOM=31.29(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=37.98BOTTOM=32.38(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=39.23BOTTOM=32.93(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=40.74(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)ASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALT ASPHALT ASPHALT 2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURB8" CONC CURB8" CONC CURBCBW CWCWCWTOP=33.49NE INV=26.84(6" CLAY)SE INV=26.95(6" CLAY)SW INV=26.90(6" CLAY)TOP=32.00NE INV=25.33(6" CLAY)NW INV=26.00(6" CLAY)SE INV=25.20(6" CLAY)VACANT - NO BUILDINGSFND 1-1/4" IPNO #FND 5/8" IRNO #SET 1/2" IRLB #4475FND 3/4" IPNO #FND 3/4" IP NO # FND N&DLB #3556FND 1-1/4" IPLS #2005FND 1-1/4" IPLS #2005N20°22'34 " W 2 5 0 . 0 4 ' M E A S MEASASPHALTDATUM = NAVD 88SITE BENCH M A R K # 1BENCHMARK N&DSITE BENCHMARK #2ELEVATION = 38.55ELEVATION = 4 2 . 7 1 BENCHMA R K N & DFH DATUM = N A V D 8 8WATER MAINWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW8" DI596594599597595593491490489488446443445444437173134131268267260258257256253235226172147146142145140143138141139137136135132133130129127128126125123124122121119117116115114111 113110112 109107 108106105 858380676865666491590583WATER MAIN8" DI596594599597595593491490489488446443445444437173134131268267260258257256253235226172147146142145140143138141139137136135132133130129127128126125123124122121119117116115114111 113110112 109107 108106105 858380676865666491590583DDDDDDDOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOW9.60.7INEDPIPES)WWWWW1"=30'2817-107_Plans.dwgSITE UTILITY PLAN - PHASE IC-7A165127 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 200Orlando, FL 32809Phone: 407-895-0324Fax: 407-895-0325www.feg-inc.usDESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY APPROVED BYPROJECT NO.SCALEDATESHEET NO.SHEET OF17-107JUNE 20, 2018FLORIDAENGINEERINGGROUPEngineering the FutureFEGSJSTHIS ITEM HAS BEENELECTRONICALLY SIGNED ANDSEALED BY (ENGINEER), P.E. ON(DATE) USING A DIGITAL SIGNATURE.PRINTED COPIES OF THISDOCUMENT ARE NOT CONSIDEREDSIGNED AND SEALED AND THESIGNATURE MUST BE VERIFIED ONANY ELECTRONIC COPIES.SAM J. SEBAALI, P.E.LICENSE NO. 42075FLORIDA ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.CERTIFICATE No. EB-0006595FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANWINTER SPRINGS MEDICAL OFFICEORLANDO, FLORIDAEAST STATE ROAD 434JT SJS SJSDATE REVISIONS BYCHECKED197 N.T.S.2817-107_Plans.dwgSITE UTILITY NOTES - PHASE IC-7B175127 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 200Orlando, FL 32809Phone: 407-895-0324Fax: 407-895-0325www.feg-inc.usDESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY APPROVED BYPROJECT NO.SCALEDATESHEET NO.SHEET OF17-107JUNE 20, 2018FLORIDAENGINEERINGGROUPEngineering the FutureFEGSJSTHIS ITEM HAS BEENELECTRONICALLY SIGNED ANDSEALED BY (ENGINEER), P.E. ON(DATE) USING A DIGITAL SIGNATURE.PRINTED COPIES OF THISDOCUMENT ARE NOT CONSIDEREDSIGNED AND SEALED AND THESIGNATURE MUST BE VERIFIED ONANY ELECTRONIC COPIES.SAM J. SEBAALI, P.E.LICENSE NO. 42075FLORIDA ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.CERTIFICATE No. EB-0006595FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANWINTER SPRINGS MEDICAL OFFICEORLANDO, FLORIDAEAST STATE ROAD 434JT SJS SJSDATE REVISIONS BYCHECKED198 5127 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 200Orlando, FL 32809Phone: 407-895-0324Fax: 407-895-0325www.feg-inc.usDESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY APPROVED BYPROJECT NO.SCALEDATESHEET NO.SHEET OF17-107JUNE 20, 2018FLORIDAENGINEERINGGROUPEngineering the FutureFEGSJSTHIS ITEM HAS BEENELECTRONICALLY SIGNED ANDSEALED BY (ENGINEER), P.E. ON(DATE) USING A DIGITAL SIGNATURE.PRINTED COPIES OF THISDOCUMENT ARE NOT CONSIDEREDSIGNED AND SEALED AND THESIGNATURE MUST BE VERIFIED ONANY ELECTRONIC COPIES.SAM J. SEBAALI, P.E.LICENSE NO. 42075FLORIDA ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.CERTIFICATE No. EB-0006595FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANWINTER SPRINGS MEDICAL OFFICEORLANDO, FLORIDAEAST STATE ROAD 434JT SJS SJSDATE REVISIONS BYCHECKEDNOTED2817-107_Details.dwgSITE CONSTRUCTION DETAILSC-818199 NOTED2817-107_CrossSections.dwgSITE CROSS SECTIONS (1 OF 3)C-9A195127 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 200Orlando, FL 32809Phone: 407-895-0324Fax: 407-895-0325www.feg-inc.usDESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY APPROVED BYPROJECT NO.SCALEDATESHEET NO.SHEET OF17-107JUNE 20, 2018FLORIDAENGINEERINGGROUPEngineering the FutureFEGSJSTHIS ITEM HAS BEENELECTRONICALLY SIGNED ANDSEALED BY (ENGINEER), P.E. ON(DATE) USING A DIGITAL SIGNATURE.PRINTED COPIES OF THISDOCUMENT ARE NOT CONSIDEREDSIGNED AND SEALED AND THESIGNATURE MUST BE VERIFIED ONANY ELECTRONIC COPIES.SAM J. SEBAALI, P.E.LICENSE NO. 42075FLORIDA ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.CERTIFICATE No. EB-0006595FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANWINTER SPRINGS MEDICAL OFFICEORLANDO, FLORIDAEAST STATE ROAD 434JT SJS SJSDATE REVISIONS BYCHECKED200 NOTED2817-107_CrossSections.dwgSITE CROSS SECTIONS (2 OF 3)C-9B205127 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 200Orlando, FL 32809Phone: 407-895-0324Fax: 407-895-0325www.feg-inc.usDESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY APPROVED BYPROJECT NO.SCALEDATESHEET NO.SHEET OF17-107JUNE 20, 2018FLORIDAENGINEERINGGROUPEngineering the FutureFEGSJSTHIS ITEM HAS BEENELECTRONICALLY SIGNED ANDSEALED BY (ENGINEER), P.E. ON(DATE) USING A DIGITAL SIGNATURE.PRINTED COPIES OF THISDOCUMENT ARE NOT CONSIDEREDSIGNED AND SEALED AND THESIGNATURE MUST BE VERIFIED ONANY ELECTRONIC COPIES.SAM J. SEBAALI, P.E.LICENSE NO. 42075FLORIDA ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.CERTIFICATE No. EB-0006595FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANWINTER SPRINGS MEDICAL OFFICEORLANDO, FLORIDAEAST STATE ROAD 434JT SJS SJSDATE REVISIONS BYCHECKED201 NOTED2817-107_CrossSections.dwgSITE CROSS SECTIONS (3 OF 3)C-9C215127 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 200Orlando, FL 32809Phone: 407-895-0324Fax: 407-895-0325www.feg-inc.usDESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY APPROVED BYPROJECT NO.SCALEDATESHEET NO.SHEET OF17-107JUNE 20, 2018FLORIDAENGINEERINGGROUPEngineering the FutureFEGSJSTHIS ITEM HAS BEENELECTRONICALLY SIGNED ANDSEALED BY (ENGINEER), P.E. ON(DATE) USING A DIGITAL SIGNATURE.PRINTED COPIES OF THISDOCUMENT ARE NOT CONSIDEREDSIGNED AND SEALED AND THESIGNATURE MUST BE VERIFIED ONANY ELECTRONIC COPIES.SAM J. SEBAALI, P.E.LICENSE NO. 42075FLORIDA ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.CERTIFICATE No. EB-0006595FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANWINTER SPRINGS MEDICAL OFFICEORLANDO, FLORIDAEAST STATE ROAD 434JT SJS SJSDATE REVISIONS BYCHECKED202 5127 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 200Orlando, FL 32809Phone: 407-895-0324Fax: 407-895-0325www.feg-inc.usDESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY APPROVED BYPROJECT NO.SCALEDATESHEET NO.SHEET OF17-107JUNE 20, 2018FLORIDAENGINEERINGGROUPEngineering the FutureFEGTHIS ITEM HAS BEENELECTRONICALLY SIGNED ANDSEALED BY (ENGINEER), P.E. ON(DATE) USING A DIGITAL SIGNATURE.PRINTED COPIES OF THISDOCUMENT ARE NOT CONSIDEREDSIGNED AND SEALED AND THESIGNATURE MUST BE VERIFIED ONANY ELECTRONIC COPIES.FLORIDA ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.CERTIFICATE No. EB-0006595FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANWINTER SPRINGS MEDICAL OFFICEORLANDO, FLORIDAEAST STATE ROAD 434DATE REVISIONS BYCHECKEDNOTED2817-107_CityDetails.dwgCITY DETAILSC-1022(SEE NOTE 2)TRENCH BACKFILL12" LIFTS MAXIMUMW/ SIZE OF PIPEVARIESSEE NOTE 4PIPE O.D.COMMON FILLBEDDING MATERIAL12" (TYP)UNDISTURBED EARTHFINISHED GRADETRENCH WIDTHSELECT COMMONFILLINITIALBACKFILL(SEENOTE 1)(SEENOTE 3)HAUNCHINGBEDDING(SEE NOTES 7 & 8)203 CURVE DATAΔ = 04°09'03"R = 1580.00'L = 114.46'CHORDS74°43'08"W114.44' DESCS67°37'58"W114.37' MEASN72°38'3734.00' DESCN65°05'47"E34.06' MEASS17°21'23"E21.40' DESCS24°31'33"E21.40' MEASPARCEL: 34-20-30-5MD-OC00-0000OWNER: HACIENDA VILLAGE CO-OP INCORB 2799, PG 589E STATE ROAD 434(R/W WIDTH VARIES)R/W MAP SECTION 77580-26105AW-0000- 0 4 8 D &PINTOOEBFHDUPUPUPN65°28'27"E 759.75' MEASN72°38'37"E 759.88' DESCS72°38'37"W 808.88' DESCS65°27'46"W 808.87' MEAS13°12'20"W 2 5 0 . 0 0 ' D E S C 4"W 2 5 0 . 0 4 ' M E A SOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOW FND 4"X4" CMNO #TOP=42.30NE INV=32.70NW INV=33.00SW INV=32.95TOP=39.30BOTTOM=32.40(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=37.99BOTTOM=31.29(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=37.98BOTTOM=32.38(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=39.23BOTTOM=32.93(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=40.74(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)ASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALT2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURBCWVACANT - NO BUILDINGSFND 3/4" IPNO #FND 5/8" IRNO #N20°22'34 " W 2 5 0 . 0 4 ' M E A S 42.50' MEASASPHALTDATUM = NAVD 88BENCHMARK N&DSITE BENCHMARK #2ELEVATION = 38.55FHWATER MAINWWWWWWWWWWWWWW8" DIWATER MAIN8" DIPARCEL: 34-20-30-5MD-OC00-0000OWNER: HACIENDA VILLAGE CO-OP INCORB 2799, PG 589E STATE ROAD 434(R/W WIDTH VARIES)R/W MAP SECTION 77580-2610PARCEL: 3 4 - 2 0 - 3 0 - 5 A W - 0 0 0 0 - 0 4 8 D OWNER: CO V A R R U B I A & PI N T O LUISA 22 C A L L E S A N I G A N C I O ORB 8713, P G 1 1 2 6EBFHDUPUPUPOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOW OWOWOWOWOWFND 4"X4" CMNO #TOP=42.30NE INV=32.70NW INV=33.00SW INV=32.95TOP=39.30BOTTOM=32.40(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=37.99BOTTOM=31.29(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=37.98BOTTOM=32.38(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=39.23BOTTOM=32.93(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=40.74(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)ASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALT2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURBCWCWVACANT - NO BUILDINGSFND 3/4" IPNO #FND 3/4" IP NO #FND 5/8" IRNO #ER OF PARCELW-0000-048D/"8"E 219.66' MEASN20°22'34"W 2 5 0 . 0 4 ' M E A S S72°12'28"W 142.50' MEASASPHALTDATUM = NAVD 88SITE BENCHMA R K # 1BENCHMARK N&DSITE BENCHMARK #2ELEVATION = 38.55ELEVATION = 4 2 . 7 1BENCHMARK N & DFH DATUM = NA V D 8 8WATER MAINWWWWWWWWWWWWWW8" DIWATER MAIN8" DICURVE DATAΔ = 04°09'03"R = 1330.00'L = 96.35'CHORDN74°43'06"E96.33' DESCN67°33'14"E96.36' MEASCURVE DATAΔ = 04°09'03"R = 1580.00'L = 114.46'CHORDS74°43'08"W114.44' DESCS67°37'58"W114.37' MEAS34.00N6534S17°21S22PARCEL: 34-20-30-5MD-OC00-0000OWNER: HACIENDA VILLAGE CO-OP INCORB 2799, PG 589E STATE ROAD 434(R/W WIDTH VARIES)R/W MAP SECTION 77580-2610PARCEL: 34- 2 0 - 3 0 - 5 A W - 0 0 0 0 - 0 4 8 D OWNER: CO V A R R U B I A & P I N T O LUISA 22 C A L L E S A N I G A N C I O ORB 8713, P G 1 1 2 6EBDUPUPUP PN65°28'27"E 759.75' MEASN72°38'37"E 759.88' DESCS72°38'37"W 808.88' DESCS65°27'46"W 808.87' MEASN13°12'20"W 2 5 0 . 0 0 ' D E S C N20°22'34 " W 2 5 0 . 0 4 ' M E A SOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOW OWOWOWOWOWOWFND 4"X4" CMNO #TOP=42.30NE INV=32.70NW INV=33.00SW INV=32.95TOP=39.30BOTTOM=32.40(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=37.99BOTTOM=31.29(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=37.98BOTTOM=32.38(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=39.23BOTTOM=32.93(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=40.74(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)ASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALT2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURBCWCWVACANT - NO BUILDINGSFND 3/4" IPNO #FND 3/4" IP NO #NW CORNER OF PARCEL34-20-30-5AW-0000-048DFND 3/4" IP, NO #FND 5/8" IRNO #SW CORNER OF PARCEL34-20-30-5AW-0000-048DFND 1/2" IR NO #N74°18'58"E 219.66' MEASN20°22'34" W 2 5 0 . 0 4 ' M E A S S72°12'28"W 142.50' MEASASPHALTDATUM = NAVD 88SITE BENCHMA R K # 1BENCHMARK N&DSITE BENCHMARK #2ELEVATION = 38.55ELEVATION = 4 2 . 7 1BENCHMARK N & D DATUM = NA V D 8 8WATER MAINWWWWWWWWWWWWW8" DIWATER MAIN8" DI1"=50'2817-107_TruckTurn.dwgTRUCK TURN PLANC-11A235127 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 200Orlando, FL 32809Phone: 407-895-0324Fax: 407-895-0325www.feg-inc.usDESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY APPROVED BYPROJECT NO.SCALEDATESHEET NO.SHEET OF17-107JUNE 20, 2018FLORIDAENGINEERINGGROUPEngineering the FutureFEGSJSTHIS ITEM HAS BEENELECTRONICALLY SIGNED ANDSEALED BY (ENGINEER), P.E. ON(DATE) USING A DIGITAL SIGNATURE.PRINTED COPIES OF THISDOCUMENT ARE NOT CONSIDEREDSIGNED AND SEALED AND THESIGNATURE MUST BE VERIFIED ONANY ELECTRONIC COPIES.SAM J. SEBAALI, P.E.LICENSE NO. 42075FLORIDA ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.CERTIFICATE No. EB-0006595FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANWINTER SPRINGS MEDICAL OFFICEORLANDO, FLORIDAEAST STATE ROAD 434JT SJS SJSDATE REVISIONS BYCHECKED204 CURVE DATAΔ = 04°09'03"R = 1580.00'L = 114.46'CHORDS74°43'08"W114.44' DESCS67°37'58"W114.37' MEASN72°38'3734.00' DESCN65°05'47"E34.06' MEASS17°21'23"E21.40' DESCS24°31'33"E21.40' MEASPARCEL: 34-20-30-5MD-OC00-0000OWNER: HACIENDA VILLAGE CO-OP INCORB 2799, PG 589E STATE ROAD 434(R/W WIDTH VARIES)R/W MAP SECTION 77580-26105AW-0000- 0 4 8 D &PINTOOEBFHDUPUPUPN65°28'27"E 759.75' MEASN72°38'37"E 759.88' DESCS72°38'37"W 808.88' DESCS65°27'46"W 808.87' MEAS13°12'20"W 2 5 0 . 0 0 ' D E S C 4"W 2 5 0 . 0 4 ' M E A S D D DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOW OWOWFND 4"X4" CMNO #TOP=42.30NE INV=32.70NW INV=33.00SW INV=32.95TOP=39.30BOTTOM=32.40(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=37.99BOTTOM=31.29(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=37.98BOTTOM=32.38(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=39.23BOTTOM=32.93(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=40.74(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)ASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALT2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURBCWVACANT - NO BUILDINGSFND 3/4" IPNO #FND 5/8" IRNO #N20°22'34 " W 2 5 0 . 0 4 ' M E A S 42.50' MEASASPHALTDATUM = NAVD 88BENCHMARK N&DSITE BENCHMARK #2ELEVATION = 38.55FHWATER MAINWWWWWWWWWWWWWW8" DIWATER MAIN8" DICURVE DATAΔ = 04°09'03"R = 1330.00'L = 96.35'CHORDN74°43'06"E96.33' DESCN67°33'14"E96.36' MEASCURVE DATAΔ = 04°09'03"R = 1580.00'L = 114.46'CHORDS74°43'08"W114.44' DESCS67°37'58"W114.37' MEASN34.00N65°05'47 E34.06' MEASS17°21'23"E21.40' DESCS24°31'33"E21.40' MEASPARCEL: 34-20-30-5MD-OC00-0000OWNER: HACIENDA VILLAGE CO-OP INCORB 2799, PG 589E STATE ROAD 434(R/W WIDTH VARIES)R/W MAP SECTION 77580-2610PARCEL: 3 4 - 2 0 - 3 0 - 5 A W - 0 0 0 0 - 0 4 8 D OWNER: CO V A R R U BI A & P I N T O LUISA 22 C A L L E S A N I G A N C I O ORB 8713, P G 1 1 2 6EBFHDUPUPUPN65°28'27"E 759.75' MEASN72°38'37"E 759.88' DESCS72°38'37"W 808.88' DESCS65°27'46"W 808.87' MEASN13°12'20"W 2 5 0 . 0 0 ' D E S C N20°22'34 " W 2 5 0 . 0 4 ' M E A S D D DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOW OWOWOWOWOWFND 4"X4" CMNO #TOP=42.30NE INV=32.70NW INV=33.00SW INV=32.95TOP=39.30BOTTOM=32.40(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=37.99BOTTOM=31.29(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=37.98BOTTOM=32.38(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=39.23BOTTOM=32.93(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=40.74(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)ASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALT2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURBCWCWVACANT - NO BUILDINGSFND 3/4" IPNO #FND 3/4" IP NO #FND 5/8" IRNO #ER OF PARCELW-0000-048D/"8"E 219.66' MEASN20°22'34"W 2 5 0 . 0 4 ' M E A S S72°12'28"W 142.50' MEASASPHALTDATUM = NAVD 88SITE BENCHMA R K # 1BENCHMARK N&DSITE BENCHMARK #2ELEVATION = 38.55ELEVATION = 4 2 . 7 1BENCHMARK N & DFH DATUM = NA V D 8 8WATER MAINWWWWWWWWWWWWWW8" DIWATER MAIN8" DICURVE DATAΔ = 04°09'03"R = 1330.00'L = 96.35'CHORDN74°43'06"E96.33' DESCN67°33'14"E96.36' MEASCURVE DATAΔ = 04°09'03"R = 1580.00'L = 114.46'CHORDS74°43'08"W114.44' DESCS67°37'58"W114.37' MEAS34.0N6534S1721SPARCEL: 34-20-30-5MD-OC00-0000OWNER: HACIENDA VILLAGE CO-OP INCORB 2799, PG 589E STATE ROAD 434(R/W WIDTH VARIES)R/W MAP SECTION 77580-2610PARCEL: 34- 2 0 - 3 0 - 5 A W - 0 0 0 0 - 0 4 8 D OWNER: C O V A R R U B I A & PI N T O LUISA 22 C A L L E S A N I G A N C I O ORB 8713, P G 1 1 2 6EBDUPUPUP PN65°28'27"E 759.75' MEASN72°38'37"E 759.88' DESCS72°38'37"W 808.88' DESCS65°27'46"W 808.87' MEASN13°12'20"W 2 5 0 . 0 0 ' D E S C N20°22'34"W 2 5 0 . 0 4 ' M E A S DD DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOW OWOWOWOWOWOWFND 4"X4" CMNO #TOP=42.30NE INV=32.70NW INV=33.00SW INV=32.95TOP=39.30BOTTOM=32.40(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=37.99BOTTOM=31.29(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=37.98BOTTOM=32.38(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=39.23BOTTOM=32.93(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)TOP=40.74(INVS NOT ATTAINED- RECESSED PIPES)ASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALT2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURBCWCWVACANT - NO BUILDINGSFND 3/4" IPNO #FND 3/4" IP NO #NW CORNER OF PARCEL34-20-30-5AW-0000-048DFND 3/4" IP, NO #FND 5/8" IRNO #SW CORNER OF PARCEL34-20-30-5AW-0000-048DFND 1/2" IR NO #N74°18'58"E 219.66' MEASN20°22'34" W 2 5 0. 0 4 ' M E A S S72°12'28"W 142.50' MEASASPHALTDATUM = NAVD 88SITE BENCHMA R K # 1BENCHMARK N&DSITE BENCHMARK #2ELEVATION = 38.55ELEVATION = 42 . 7 1BENCHMARK N & D DATUM = NA V D 8 8WATER MAINWWWWWWWWWWWWW8" DIWATER MAIN8" DI1"=50'2817-107_FireTruckTurn.dwgFIRE TRUCK TURN PLANC-11B245127 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 200Orlando, FL 32809Phone: 407-895-0324Fax: 407-895-0325www.feg-inc.usDESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY APPROVED BYPROJECT NO.SCALEDATESHEET NO.SHEET OF17-107JUNE 20, 2018FLORIDAENGINEERINGGROUPEngineering the FutureFEGSJSTHIS ITEM HAS BEENELECTRONICALLY SIGNED ANDSEALED BY (ENGINEER), P.E. ON(DATE) USING A DIGITAL SIGNATURE.PRINTED COPIES OF THISDOCUMENT ARE NOT CONSIDEREDSIGNED AND SEALED AND THESIGNATURE MUST BE VERIFIED ONANY ELECTRONIC COPIES.SAM J. SEBAALI, P.E.LICENSE NO. 42075FLORIDA ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.CERTIFICATE No. EB-0006595FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANWINTER SPRINGS MEDICAL OFFICEORLANDO, FLORIDAEAST STATE ROAD 434JT SJS SJSDATE REVISIONS BYCHECKED205 FHD D D DDDDDDDD D DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDS S OWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOW133.4'ASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALT ASPHALT ASPHALT 2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURBC CURB2' CONC CURB2' CONC C U R B 8" CONC CU R B 8" CONC C U R B CWCWCWN20°22'34 " W 2 5 0 . 0 4' M E A S S72°12'28"W 142.50' MEASWETLAND SUMMARYWETLAND "1" - CONTAINS 49,795 SQUARE FEET OR 1.1431 ACRES MORE OR LESS.WETLAND "2" - CONTAINS 19,752 SQUARE FEET OR 0.4534 ACRES MORE OR LESS.UPLAND AREA - CONTAINS 154,961 SQUARE FEET OR 3.5574 ACRES MORE OR LESS.TOTAL AREA - CONTAINS 224,508 SQUARE FEET OR 5.1539 ACRES MORE OR LESS.ASPHALTFHWATER MAINWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW8" DI116596594599597595593491490489488446443445444437173134131268267260258257256253235226172147146142145140143138141139137136135132133130129127128126125123124122121119117116115114 111 113110 112 109 107108 106105 858380676865666491590583WATER MAIN8" DI1"=30'1917-107_Landscape-Irrigation.dwgSITE LANDSCAPE PLANL-118Orlando, FL 32809Phone: 407-895-0324Fax: 407-895-0325www.feg-inc.usDESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY APPROVED BYPROJECT NO.SCALEDATESHEET NO.SHEET OFDATE REVISIONS BY17-107JUNE 20, 2018FLORIDAENGINEERINGGROUPEngineering the FutureFEGRICK ABTLICENSE NO. 1321THIS ITEM HAS BEENELECTRONICALLY SIGNED ANDSEALED BY (ENGINEER), P.E. ON(DATE) USING A DIGITAL SIGNATURE.PRINTED COPIES OF THISDOCUMENT ARE NOT CONSIDEREDSIGNED AND SEALED AND THESIGNATURE MUST BE VERIFIED ONANY ELECTRONIC COPIES.FLORIDA ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.CERTIFICATE No. EB-0006595FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANWINTER SPRINGS MEDICAL OFFICEORLANDO, FLORIDAEAST STATE ROAD 434RTA RTA RTA RTATREE PRESERVATION CHARTMITIGATION (NOT INCLUDING WETLANDS TREES):TREE PRESERVATION LIST206 FHD D D DDDDDDDD D DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD S S OWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOW133.4'ASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALTASPHALT ASPHALT ASPHALT 2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURB2' CONC CURBC CURB2' CONC CURB2' CONC CU R B 8" CONC C U R B 8" CONC CU R B CWCWCWN20°22'34" W 2 5 0 . 0 4 ' M E A S S72°12'28"W 142.50' MEASASPHALTFHWATER MAINWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW8" DI116596594599597595593491490489488446443445444437173134131268267260258257256253235226172147146142145140143138141139137136135132133130129127128126125123124122121119117116115114 111 113110 112 109 107108 106105 858380676865666491590583WATER MAIN8" DI1"=30'1917-107_Landscape-Irrigation.dwgSITE IRRIGATION PLANL-219Orlando, FL 32809Phone: 407-895-0324Fax: 407-895-0325www.feg-inc.usDESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY APPROVED BYPROJECT NO.SCALEDATESHEET NO.SHEET OFDATE REVISIONS BY17-107JUNE 20, 2018FLORIDAENGINEERINGGROUPEngineering the FutureFEGJEAN M. ABI-AOUN, P.E.LICENSE NO. 45128WILLIAM R. HOCKENSMITH, P.E.LICENSE NO. 35540RICK ABTLICENSE NO. 1321SJSTHIS ITEM HAS BEENELECTRONICALLY SIGNED ANDSEALED BY (ENGINEER), P.E. ON(DATE) USING A DIGITAL SIGNATURE.PRINTED COPIES OF THISDOCUMENT ARE NOT CONSIDEREDSIGNED AND SEALED AND THESIGNATURE MUST BE VERIFIED ONANY ELECTRONIC COPIES.SAM J. SEBAALI, P.E.LICENSE NO. 42075FLORIDA ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.CERTIFICATE No. EB-0006595FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANWINTER SPRINGS MEDICAL OFFICEORLANDO, FLORIDAEAST STATE ROAD 434JT SJS SJSSIMON H. PHAM, P.E.LICENSE NO. 63841GREGORY R. CRAWFORD, P.E.LICENSE NO. 51335RTA RTA RTA RTA 207 208 5127 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 200Orlando, FL 32809Phone: 407-895-0324Fax: 407-895-0325www.feg-inc.usDESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY APPROVED BYPROJECT NO.SCALEDATESHEET NO.SHEET OF17-107JUNE 20, 2018FLORIDAENGINEERINGGROUPEngineering the FutureFEGFINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANWINTER SPRINGS MEDICAL OFFICEORLANDO, FLORIDAEAST STATE ROAD 434DATE REVISIONS BYCHECKEDNOTED2817-107_SiteLightingPLan.dwgSITE LIGHTING SPECIFICATIONSSL-228209 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Chau Family Holdings III, LLC Page 1 of 13 THIS INSTRUMENT WAS PREPARED BY AND SHOULD BE RETURNED TO: Anthony A. Garganese City Attorney of Winter Springs Garganese, Weiss, D'Agresta & Salzman, P.A. 111 N. Orange Avenue, Suite 2000 Orlando, FL 32802 (407) 425-9566 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Chau Medical Center THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and executed this ______ day of _________________, 2020, by and between the CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, a Florida Municipal Corporation (“City"), whose address is 1126 East S.R. 434, Winter Springs, Florida 32708, and CHAU FAMILY HOLDINGS III, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, whose address is 1287 Semoran Boulevard, Suite 200, Orlando, FL 32807. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer is the owner of approximately 5.08 acres, more or less, of real property located west of the intersection of Hacienda Drive and SR 434, in Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida, zoned C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) more particularly described herein (“Property”); and WHEREAS, Developer has applied for Final Engineering/Site Plan Approval, Aesthetic Plan Approval for the Medical Office, Specimen Tree Removal, and certain Waivers from the City Code in order to construct a Medical Office, Assisted Living Facility, and Retail building on the Property in a phased development; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 20 Zoning, Article II, Division 1, Section 20-29.1 of the Winter Springs City Code (“City Code”), a community workshop for the Project was held on August 13, 2019; and WHEREAS, Section 20-29(c) of the City Code requires that all site plans and waivers shall be binding on the use of the subject property and, further, that as a condition of approval by the City Commission, all development projects requiring a community workshop pursuant to Section 20-29.1 of the City Code shall be required to be memorialized in a binding development agreement; and FOR RECORDING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY 210 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Chau Family Holdings III, LLC Page 2 of 13 WHEREAS, this Development Agreement shall be recorded against the property so that the terms and conditions of approval related to the Project shall run with the land; and NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties mutually agree as follows: 1.0 Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated herein by this reference. 2.0 Authority. This Agreement is entered into pursuant to the Florida Municipal Home Rule Powers Act. 3.0 The Property. The real property subject to this Agreement has a tax parcel identification number of 34-20-30-5AW-0000-048A and is legally described in EXHIBIT “A”, attached hereto and fully incorporated herein by this reference (“Property”). 4.0 Project Description and Requirements. Developer shall, at its expense, design, permit and construct a Medical Office, Assisted Living Facility, and Retail Building in three phases on the Property, for a total of 65, 970 square feet of building space, and supporting infrastructure, stormwater pond, parking lots, and landscaping. (Hereinafter the project description and requirements are referred to as the “Project”). Given the intent to develop the Property with these three primary uses, the “Overall Master Site Plan”, Sheet C-5A of the Final Engineering Plans, attached hereto as EXHIBIT “B” for convenience and incorporated herein by this reference, depicts three “Development Areas”: (1) Development Area 1 (Medical Office), (2) Development Area 2 (Retail Building), and (3) Development Area 3 (Assisted Living Facility). These Development Areas do not correspond or relate to the sequence of the phasing of the Project or the extent of infrastructure to be developed in each phase, which is described below in Section 4.1. The Developer has no current plans to subdivide the Property, and the Development Areas depicted represent only future building sites for each of the primary uses rather than separately-owned lots. The Developer shall construct the Project in a manner consistent with the approved Final Engineering/Site Plans, Aesthetic Plans, and Waivers that are on file with the City with the following file numbers and consistent with the requirements contained in this Agreement: File Nos: ZP2018-0015 Final Engineering/Site Plans, AE2020-0009 Aesthetic Review, WA2020-0020 Waiver 4.1 Phasing. The Project shall be developed in three phases as described and outlined in the “Overall Master Site Plan,” Exhibit B. Phase One of development shall include the construction of a 10,190 square-foot medical office in Development Area 1, fifty (50) parking spaces, two access driveways from SR 434, internal drive aisles connecting the access 211 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Chau Family Holdings III, LLC Page 3 of 13 driveways and surrounding the medical office, all utility infrastructure for the Project and stub- outs to each Development Area, stormwater pond, wall along the southern boundary of the Property, and certain landscaping as identified in the site landscaping plan. With respect to tree replacement, the Developer shall be required in Phase One to plant at least 639 caliper inches of new trees, with the remaining 150 caliper inches to be replaced in Phases Two and Three. Developer shall receive building permits and substantially commence vertical construction of buildings for Phase One of the Project, which shall at minimum include building foundations, within one (1) year of the Effective Date of this Agreement. Phases Two and Three of the Project shall include a 6,400 square-foot Retail Building and a 114-bed, 49,380 square-foot Assisted Living Facility (ALF), and all remaining parking and landscaping within each associated Development Area not already completed during Phase One. The Developer has not identified the sequence of construction of the Retail Building and Assisted Living Facility, but the Developer shall complete Aesthetic Review of each building, obtain building permits, and substantially commence vertical construction, which shall at minimum include building foundations, of all buildings in Phases Two and Three within three (3) years of receiving certificates of occupancy for Phase One. If the Developer fails to obtain such building permits, aesthetic approvals, and commence vertical construction within the aforesaid timeframes above, the City shall have the right to declare the Developer in default pursuant to Paragraph 22.0 of this Agreement. If the Developer does not cure the default within the cure period, the City shall have the right, but not obligation to, terminate this Agreement without penalty. 4.2 Specific conditions of approval. Specific conditions of approval for the above-referenced Final Engineering Plans, Aesthetic Plans and Waivers, include the following, which are also addressed in the staff report for the Final Engineering/Site Plans, Aesthetic Plans, and Waivers: A. A Cross Access Easement, Shared Parking Agreement, and Utilities and Drainage Easements shall be approved and provided to the City prior to the approval of any future lot split or subdivision of the Property. Shared parking between Development Area 1 (Medical Office) and Development Area 3 (Assisted Living Facility) shall be required in the event the applicant splits or subdivides the Property. Should the parties ever mutually desire to terminate said Easements and Shared Parking Agreement, prior to executing such termination, the Parties shall seek and receive consent from the City of Winter Springs and obtain an amendment to the site plan. B. The Developer shall be required to stub-out a common driveway access to the adjacent parcel, Parcel ID 34-20-30-5AW-0000-048D, for future connection to that parcel either prior to receiving a certificate of occupancy for the Development Area 2 (Retail Building) or upon the development of the adjacent parcel, whichever occurs first. Further, should the adjacent property owner ever develop that parcel, the Developer agrees it shall enter into a Cross Access Easement with the adjacent property owner in a form satisfactory to the City. Should the parties ever mutually desire to terminate said Cross Access Easement over the common driveway 212 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Chau Family Holdings III, LLC Page 4 of 13 access, prior to executing such termination, the Parties shall seek and receive consent from the City of Winter Springs and obtain an amendment to the site plan. C. Upon completion of Phase One, the Development Areas 2 and 3 shall be graded, seeded, and mulched in preparation for future development. The Developer shall be required to maintain the grass and vegetation in Development Areas 2 and 3 prior to commencement of construction in these Areas. D. Developer shall be required in Phase One to plant at least 639 caliper inches of new replacement trees, with the remaining 150 caliper inches to be replaced in Phases Two and Three. All required tree replacements in each Development Area shall be planted prior to the issuance of any final certificate of occupancy for any building in such Development Area. Tree replacements and landscaping shall be subject to the obligation of ongoing maintenance and replacement for the first two years following planting, at the Developer’s expense, if the City determines, after reasonable inspection, that any tree or landscaping has become severely diseased or damaged to the point that the viability of the tree or landscaping has been significantly compromised. In the event that Developer fails to perform the necessary maintenance, repairs or replacements of any of the trees or landscaping, the City shall have the right, but not obligation, to conduct said maintenance, repairs or replacements and recover the actual cost thereof from the Developer. Prior to exercising that right, the City shall provide the Developer written notice and an explanation of the specific default and at least thirty (30) days in which to cure the default. If Developer fails to cure the default by the end of the cure period, the City may exercise its rights to maintain and replace at any time thereafter. The Developer shall additionally submit: (1) a $65,700.00 tree bank mitigation payment for trees that are not possible to replace on the Property; and (2) a Landscape Performance and Maintenance Bond in a form acceptable to the City Attorney ensuring planting and installation of all required trees and landscaping, including in all three Development Areas, should the Project or any individual Phase be abandoned after the Property has been cleared and proper maintenance of the trees for two (2) years after planting. Given the phased nature and lengthy duration of the Project, the Landscape Performance and Maintenance bond must have a duration that is automatically extended, without notice to the surety, for successive periods until all landscaping requirements have been completed or be provided in a similar form acceptable to the City Attorney. The tree bank mitigation payment and Landscape Performance and Maintenance Bond shall be submitted prior to obtaining the first clearing and grading or building permit, whichever is earlier. E. The 15’ Utility Easement as referenced on Sheets C-5A2 and C-7B of the Final Engineering Plans shall be dedicated and an appropriate bill of sale for the sanitary sewer main and associated improvements shall be delivered to the City prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy for Phase One in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. Upon completion and acceptance of the sanitary sewer main by the City, conveyance of the sanitary sewer improvements shall be by bill of sale and free and clear of all liens. F. The Final Engineering Plans shall be updated to provide a detail of the potable water service line and the above-ground installation of an RPZ backflow prevention assembly needs to be included and shown. 213 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Chau Family Holdings III, LLC Page 5 of 13 G. No building in the Project shall exceed a height of three stories. H. The City Commission herein imposes certain use restrictions greater than those otherwise specified in the C-1 zoning district to ensure any negative impacts of the commercial development are minimized and to ensure the future development is compatible with the surrounding uses. The following uses shall be permitted on the Property: 1. Animal hospitals and veterinary clinics (with no outside kennels) 2. Art supplies and picture framing shops 3. Artists’ (such as painters, sculptures, and craft makers) studios 4. Cleaners, Alterations, Tailoring and Shoe Repair 5. Confectionary and ice cream stores (including outside dining) 6. Dance and music studios 7. Health and exercise clubs and athletic training facilities 8. Interior decorating and draperies 9. Office a. Advertising Agencies b. Attorney c. Bookkeeper d. Dental e. Insurance f. Medical g. Professional and Business h. Title Companies i. Travel Agency 10. Pet shops and grooming 11. Photographic studios 12. Restaurants and outdoor dining; cafes 13. Retail uses as follows: a. Bakery b. Bicycle c. Bookstore d. Hardware e. Health Food f. Florist g. Office and Stationary Supplies 14. Retirement homes, including nursing homes, assisted living facilities, and independent living facilities 15. Swimming pool sales, service and supplies 5.0 Future Permitting. The Developer shall be required to obtain Aesthetic Review approval for Phases Two and Three, as well as building permits, as required by the Winter Springs City Code. Future permitting schedules are as established in Section 4.1 above. 214 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Chau Family Holdings III, LLC Page 6 of 13 6.0 Representations of the Parties. The City and Developer hereby each represent and warrant to the other that it has the power and authority to execute, deliver and perform the terms and provisions of this Agreement and has taken all necessary action to authorize the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement. The Developer further agrees and makes the following representations and warranties to the City: A. The Developer is lawfully seized of the Property in fee simple and has full and lawful authority to execute this Agreement and bind the Property as set forth herein. B. The Property is free and clear of all mortgages and liens. This Agreement will, when duly executed and delivered by the City and Developer, constitute a legal, valid and binding obligation enforceable against the parties hereto. Upon recording of this Agreement in the Public Records of Seminole County, Florida, the Agreement shall be a binding obligation upon the Property in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Developer represents that it has voluntarily and willfully executed this Agreement for purposes of binding himself and the Property to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. 7.0 Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall automatically be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the City and Developer and their respective successors and assigns. The terms and conditions of this Agreement similarly shall be binding upon the Property, and shall run with title to the same upon being duly recorded against the Property by the City. 8.0 Applicable Law; Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. The venue of any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be in Seminole County, Florida or, for federal court actions, in Orlando, Florida. 9.0 Amendments. This Agreement shall not be modified or amended except by written agreement duly executed by both parties hereto (or their successors or assigns) and approved by the City Commission. 10.0 Entire Agreement; Exhibits. This Agreement and all attached exhibits hereto supersede any other agreement, oral or written, regarding the Property and contain the entire agreement between the City and Developer as to the subject matter hereof. The Exhibits attached hereto and referenced herein are hereby fully incorporated herein by this reference. 11.0 Severability. If any provision of this Agreement shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable to any extent by a court of competent jurisdiction, the same shall not affect in any respect the validity or enforceability of the remainder of this Agreement. 12.0 Effective Date. This Agreement shall become effective upon approval by the City Commission and execution of this Agreement by both parties hereto. 215 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Chau Family Holdings III, LLC Page 7 of 13 13.0 Recordation. Upon full execution by the Parties, this Agreement shall be recorded in the Public Records of Seminole County, Florida by the City. The Developer shall be responsible for all recording fees associated with this Agreement. 14.0 Relationship of the Parties. The relationship of the parties to this Agreement is contractual and Developer is an independent contractor and not an agent of the City. Nothing herein shall be deemed to create a joint venture or principal-agent relationship between the parties, and neither party is authorized to, nor shall either party act toward third persons or the public in any manner, which would indicate any such relationship with the other. 15.0 Sovereign Immunity. The City intends to avail itself of sovereign immunity and other applicable limitations on City liability whenever deemed applicable by the City. Therefore, notwithstanding any other provision set forth in this Agreement, nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed as a waiver of the City’s right to sovereign immunity under section 768.28, Florida Statutes, or other limitations imposed on the City’s potential liability under state or federal law. As such, the City shall not be liable under this Agreement for punitive damages or interest for the period before judgment. Further, the City shall not be liable for any claim or judgment, or portion thereof, to any one person for more than two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000.00), or any claim or judgment, or portion thereof, which, when totaled with all other claims or judgments paid by the State or its agencies and subdivisions arising out of the same incident or occurrence, exceeds the sum of three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000.00). 16.0 City's Police Power. Developer agrees and acknowledges that the City hereby reserves all police powers granted to the City by law. In no way shall this Agreement be construed as the City bargaining away or surrendering its police powers. 17.0 Interpretation. The parties hereby agree and acknowledge that they have both participated equally in the drafting of this Agreement and no party shall be favored or disfavored regarding the interpretation to this Agreement in the event of a dispute between the parties. 18.0 Third-Party Rights. This Agreement is not a third-party beneficiary contract and shall not in any way whatsoever create any rights on behalf of any third party. 19.0 Specific Performance. Strict compliance shall be required with each and every provision of this Agreement. The parties agree that failure to perform the obligations provided by this Agreement shall result in irreparable damage and that specific performance of these obligations may be obtained by a suit in equity. 20.0 Attorney's Fees. In connection with any arbitration or litigation arising out of this Agreement, each party shall be responsible for their own attorney’s fees and costs. 21.0 Development Permits. Nothing herein shall limit the City's authority to grant or deny any development permit applications or requests subsequent to the effective date of this Agreement in accordance with the criteria of the City Code and the requirements of this Agreement. The failure of this Agreement to address any particular City, County, State and/or 216 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Chau Family Holdings III, LLC Page 8 of 13 Federal permit, condition, term or restriction shall not relieve Developer or the City of the necessity of complying with the law governing said permitting requirement, condition, term or restriction. Without imposing any limitation on the City’s police powers, the City reserves the right to withhold, suspend or terminate any and all certificates of occupancy for any building, trailer, structure or unit if Developer is in breach of any term and condition of this Agreement. 22.0 Default. Failure by either party to perform each and every one of its obligations hereunder shall constitute a default, entitling the non-defaulting party to pursue whatever remedies are available to it under Florida law or equity including, without limitation, termination of this Agreement, an action for specific performance, and/or injunctive relief. Prior to any party filing any action as a result of a default under this Agreement, the non-defaulting party shall first provide the defaulting party with written notice of said default. Upon receipt of said notice, the defaulting party shall be provided a thirty (30) day opportunity in which to cure the default to the reasonable satisfaction of the non-defaulting party prior to filing said action. 23.0 Termination. The City shall have the unconditional right, but not obligation, to terminate this Agreement, without notice or penalty, if Developer fails to receive building permits and substantially commence vertical construction of buildings in accordance with the timelines established in Section 4.1. The Developer may apply to the City Commission for an extension of this Agreement, which may be granted upon good cause shown. In addition, the City shall have the right, but not obligation, to terminate the Agreement if Developer permanently abandons construction of the Project, provided, however, the City shall first deliver written notice and an opportunity to cure to the defaulting party as set forth in Section 22.0 above. If the City terminates this Agreement, the City shall record a notice of termination against the Property in the public records of Seminole County, Florida. 24.0 Indemnification and Hold Harmless. Developer shall be solely responsible for designing, permitting, constructing, operating and maintaining this Project. As such, Developer hereby agrees to indemnify, release, and hold harmless the City and its commissioners, employees and attorneys from and against all claims, losses, damages, personal injuries (including, but not limited to, death), or liability (including reasonable attorney’s fees and costs through all appellate proceedings), directly or indirectly arising from, out of, or caused by Developer and Developer’s contractor’s and subcontractor’s performance of design, permit and construction, and maintenance activities in furtherance of constructing the Project and maintaining the improvements of this Project. This indemnification shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 25.0 Force Majeure. The parties agree that in the event that the failure by either party to accomplish any action required hereunder within a specified time period (“Time Period”) constitutes a default under the terms of this Agreement and, if any such failure is due to any unforeseeable or unpredictable event or condition beyond the control of such party, including, but not limited to, acts of God, acts of government authority (other than the City’s own acts), acts of public enemy or war, riots, civil disturbances, power failure, shortages of labor or materials, injunction or other court proceedings beyond the control of such party, or severe adverse weather conditions (“Uncontrollable Event”), then, notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to 217 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Chau Family Holdings III, LLC Page 9 of 13 the contrary, that failure shall not constitute a default under this Agreement and any Time Period proscribed hereunder shall be extended by the amount of time that such party was unable to perform solely due to the Uncontrollable Event. The extended time period shall be agreed to in writing by the parties and said agreement shall not be unreasonably withheld by either party. 26. Notice. Whenever either party desires to give notice to the other, notice shall be sent by hand delivery or certified mail, return receipt requested, and shall be sent to: For the City: Shawn Boyle, City Manager City of Winter Springs 1126 East S.R. 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 With additional notice to: Anthony A. Garganese, City Attorney Garganese, Weiss, D’Agresta & Salzman, P.A. 111 N. Orange Avenue, Suite 2000 Orlando, FL 32802 For Developer: Either party may freely modify their respective contact person and address contained in this Paragraph by providing written notice of the modification to the other party. Any Notice given as provided herein shall be deemed received as follows: if delivered by personal service, on the date so delivered; and if mailed, on the third business day after mailing. 27.0 Assignment. Prior to completing the construction of the Project and reaching final build-out of the Project, Developer shall not assign this Agreement without the prior written consent of the City. Such assignment shall also require the written approval of the City by amendment to this Agreement, which shall not require a public hearing and shall not be unreasonably withheld. However, Developer shall be entitled to assign its rights and obligations under this Agreement to a parent, subsidiary, or affiliated entity in which Developer or its members are members or interest holders without City consent, provided that the City is given notice of such assignment in accordance with Section 26.0 herein. Any assignment authorized 218 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Chau Family Holdings III, LLC Page 10 of 13 by this subparagraph shall require the assignee to be a formal signatory to this Agreement and fully assume all of Developer’s obligations, commitments, representations, and warranties under this Agreement. In any assignment, the rights and obligations contained herein shall be binding on successors in interest to the Property, and the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and any respective successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands and seal on the date first above written. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS By: Charles Lacey, Mayor ATTEST: By: Christian Gowan, City Clerk Date: _______________________________ CITY SEAL APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY For the use and reliance of the City of Winter Springs, Florida only. Date: By: Anthony A. Garganese, City Attorney for the City of Winter Springs, Florida STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF SEMINOLE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of (___) physical presence or (___) online notarization, this ______ day of ___________, 2020, by Charles Lacey, Mayor of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, a Florida municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation, who is personally known to me or produced ___________________ _______________ as identification. (NOTARY SEAL) (Notary Public Signature) (Print Name) Notary Public, State of Commission No.: My Commission Expires: ________________ 219 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Chau Family Holdings III, LLC Page 11 of 13 Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of the following witnesses: Signature of Witness Printed Name of Witness Signature of Witness Printed Name of Witness CHAU FAMILY HOLDINGS III, LLC Print name and title: ________________________ Date: _______________ STATE OF COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of (___) physical presence or (___) online notarization, this ______ day of ___________, 2020, by____________________, the __________________of Chau Family Holdings III, LLC, a limited liability company, on behalf of the company, who is personally known to me or produced ___________________ _______________ as identification. (NOTARY SEAL) (Notary Public Signature) (Print Name) Notary Public, State of Commission No.: My Commission Expires: DEVELOPER IS HEREBY ADVISED THAT SHOULD DEVELOPER FAIL TO FULLY EXECUTE, AND DELIVER TO THE CITY, THIS AGREEMENT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE DATE THAT THE CITY COMMISSION APPROVES THIS AGREEMENT, THIS AGREEMENT, AND THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPROVALS REFERENCED HEREUNDER, SHALL AUTOMATICALLY BE DEEMED NULL AND VOID. 220 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Chau Family Holdings III, LLC Page 12 of 13 EXHIBIT A PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION 221 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Chau Family Holdings III, LLC Page 13 of 13 EXHIBIT B OVERALL MASTER SITE PLAN 222