Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWaste Pro of Florida Annual Evaluation Report 2020 05 29 WASTE PRO OF FLORIDA INC. ' ANNUAL EVALUATION REPORT For the Period March 1,2019—February 29,2020 AUTHORITY: In accordance with the Solid Waste Agreement dated March 1, 2006 and amended on January 28, 2020 between the City of Winter Springs and Waste Pro of Florida, Inc., Section 9.3, Contractor's performance shall be annually evaluated by City's Authorized Representative and/or City Commission. The evaluation shall be based in the level of service criteria set forth in paragraph 9.1 of the Solid Waste Agreement. For each criteria the Authorized Representative shall evaluate and grade Contractor's performance as Unacceptable, Acceptable but Needs Improvement,or Good. 'For each review criteria in which Contractor receives an unacceptable grade, the Authorized Representative shall provide Contractor a written explanation of why Contractor's performance was unacceptable and Contractor shall be given a reasonable period of time, as determined by the Authorized Representative, to bring its level of performance up to levels acceptable to the Authorized Representative. EVALUATION: Grade Scale: Good, Acceptable but Needs:Improvement, Unacceptable(requires explanation) CRTFERu A: The number of complaints received pursuant to paragraph 9.2 of the Solid Waste Agreement and Contractor's erformance in resolvin the complaints in a professional and a dient manner. GRADE:Ace table but Needs Improvement EXPLANATION: ■ Complaints resolved in allowable time frame. ■ Quantity of complaints still within acceptable levels Steady decrease in service issues over last 12 months and less than the prior 12 months.The annual spike in service issues Burin the summer months requires improvement. EXPECTED RESOLUTION DATE: Ongoing CRITERIA B: Contractor's responsiveness to direction 'ven by the Authorized Re resentative. GRADE: Good EXPLANATION: Contractor has been very responsive to City directions), A City/Waste Pro mutually developed system of dispatching service issues via e-mail directly to Waste Pro field personnel which has shown notable success in reducing*re eat calls and escalations. EXPECTED RESOLUTION DATE:NIA CRITERA C: The number of times that Contractor had to pay liquidated damages pursuant to.paragraph 25.0 of the Solid Waste a eement. GRADE:Good m EXPLANATION: No li uidated damn es in this evaluation period. EXPECTED RESOLUTION DATE:N/A __ CRITERIA D: Contractor's participation in community meetin slevents s .onsored by City. GRADE: Goad EXPLANATION: Contractor provided$5,000 in donations to City's 4'of July event during the evaluation period,fulfilling contractual requirement. Special event support which included provision of toters and roll-offs was well coordinatedlexecuted.In attendance and well-represented at all re nested meetiri s. _ . EXPECTED RESOLUTION DATE.N/A CRITERIA E: Contractor's financial viability to continue performing the collection and disposal service as required by this - GRADE: Good EXPLANATION:Reviewed Audited Financial Statements at 12/31/19 (Vestal&Wiler CPAs EXPECTED RESOLUTION DATE:NIA CRITERIA F: Contractor's compliance with its"Customer Service Policy".required by paragraph 9.4 of the Solid Waste A Bement. GRADE: Acceptable but Needs Improvement EXPLANATION: The previous!y i p lemented TracEZ sYstem was abandoned for the s stem described in CRITERIA B above. EXPECTED RESOLUTION DATE:Ongoing ---- - w CRITERIA G: Injection.records of all collection vehicles. GRADE: Good EXPLANATION: Three(3)new vehicles in service in Winter Springs;two(2)trucks refurbished; all vehicles under o annual DOT.ins ection and are serviced every 200 en 'ne hours. EXPECTED RESOLUTION DATE:NIA CERTIFICATION: Certified by the undersiput, uthorized Representative of the City of Winter Springs,Florida: Shawn Boyle,, ,:y Manager Date Received tbyoctor,Waste Pro of Florida: C or Date