HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-23-2008 Legal opinion on Public Records RequestJan Palladino
From:
Kate Latorre [klatorre @ orlandolaw. net]
Sent:
Tuesday, December 23, 2008 12:12 PM
To:
Ron McLemore
Cc:
Jan Palladino; Michelle Greco; Andrea Lorenzo-luaces
Subject:
Legal Opinion on Public Records Request
Attachments:
Kate Latorre.vcf; Solid Waste & Trade Secret.pdf
Ron
Please find our legal opinion attached hereto regarding a public records request submitted to the City last week seeking
information related to the City's commercial solid waste customers. Please contact Anthony or me with any questions or
concerns.
Thanks,
Kate
Ci
Katherine W. Latorre, Esq.
Board Certified in City, County & Local Government Law
111 N. Orange Avenue, Suite 2000
P.O. Box 2873
Orlando, Florida 32802-2873
Phone (407) 425-9566
Fax (407) 425-9596
Kissimmee (321) 402-0144
Cocoa (866) 425-9566
Website: www.orlandolaw.net
Email: klatorre@orlandolaw.net
Any incoming e-mail reply to this communication will be electronically filtered for "spam" and/or "viruses." That filtering
process may result in such reply being quarantined (i.e., potentially not received at our site at all) and/or delayed in
reaching us. For that reason, we may not receive your reply and/or we may not receive it in a timely manner. Accordingly,
you should consider sending communications to us which are particularly important or time -sensitive by means other than
e-mail. Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, and any attachment to it, contains privileged and confidential information
intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity named on the e-mail. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
reading it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately return it to the sender and
delete it from your system. Thank you.
BROWN, GARGANESE, WEISS & UAGRESTA, P.A.
Debra S. Babb-NutcheF
Joseph E. Blitch
Usher L. Brown'
Suzanne D'Agresta°
Anthony A. Garganese°
William E. Reischmann, Jr.
J.W. Taylor
Jeffrey S. Weiss
'Board Certified Civil Trial Lawyer
`Board Certified City, County & Local Government Law
Board Certified Appellate Practice
Ronald McLemore
City Manager
City of Winter Springs
1126 E. State Road 434
Winter Springs, FL 32708
Attorneys at.Laiv
Offices in Orlando, Kissimmee, Cocoa, Tara L. Barrett
Ft. Lauderdale & Tampa Vivian P. Cocotas
Scott J. Dornstein
Robin Gibson Drage
Christopher H. Hunt
Katherine W. Latorre`
Terri E. Oster
Richard W. Withers
December 23, 2008
Re: Public Records Request for Commercial Solid Waste Data
Dear Ron:
Gary M. Glassman
Erin J. O'Leary'
Amy J. Pitsch
Catherine D. Reischmann°
Of Counsel
Finance Director Michelle Greco contacted my office last week seeking guidance
on responding to a public records request submitted by a waste hauler seeking certain data
related to the City's commercial solid waste customers. Michelle was concerned with
disclosing the latest commercial customer report received by the City because Waste Pro
had marked the report "Proprietary & Confidential" on each page. There is no indication
that Waste Pro has changed its position with regard to the report's confidentiality. After
reviewing the applicable statutes and other legal authority, as well as the City's current
Franchise Agreement with Waste Pro, I recommend against disclosing the requested data
because it may constitute "trade secret" information.
Analysis
The City's Franchise Agreement with Waste Pro requires in Section 19.3 that Waste
Pro provide the City with a monthly report listing various information related to the services
provided to the commercial customers located within the City. The report includes, among
other things, customer names, frequency of pickup, total yards, revenue per yard, and
other fees and revenues associated with the solid waste services provided to the
commercial customers. Additionally, section 19.1 of the Franchise Agreement provides
that the City shall have inspection and copying rights to certain records of Waste Pro that
constitute public records under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. However, the Agreement
111 N. Orange Ave, Suite 2000 • P.O. Box 2873 • Orlando, Florida 32802-2873
Orlando (407) 425-9566 Fax (407) 425-9596 • Kissimmee (321) 402-0144 - Cocoa (866) 425-9566 - Ft. Lauderdale (954) 670-1979
Website: www.orlandolaw.net • Email: firm@orlandolaw.net
R. McLemore
December 23, 2008
Page 2
provides in the same section that Waste Pro's trade secrets and proprietary information
shall not be subject to public records disclosure.
Florida law's definition of "trade secret" includes any "compilation of information
which is for use, or is used, in the operation of a business and which provides the business
an advantage, or an opportunity to obtain an advantage, over those who do not know or
use it." § 812.081(1)(c), Fla. Stat. Further, trade secrets include commercial information
and customer lists. Id. In addition to the trade secret being used by and giving an
advantage to a business, section 812.081 also specifies that trade secrets are considered
to be secret and of value when the owner of the trade secret information takes measures
to prevent it from becoming available to persons other than those selected by the owner
to have access to it for limitedpurposes. Id. (emphasis supplied).
The Florida Legislature has provided an express exemption to Florida's public
records laws for trade secret information, finding such exemption to be a "public necessity."
See § 815.045, Fla. Stat. Given that it is a felony to disclose trade secret information, the
Legislature explained that there is legal uncertainty as to whether a public employee would
be protected from a felony conviction if the employee otherwise complied with the
disclosure requirements of Florida's Public Record Law. Id. Further, the Legislature
explained that allowing trade secret information in an agency's possession to be disclosed
would negatively impact the business interests of those to whom the trade secrets belong,
thereby damaging them in the marketplace. Id. This would, in turn, cause those entities
with trade secret information to hesitate in cooperating with agencies and impair the
effective and efficient administration of governmental functions. Id.
In Sepro Corp. v. Fla. Dep't of Environ. Protection, 839 So. 2d 781 (Fla. 1 st DCA
2003), the court considered whether certain information provided to a public agency should
be disclosed as a public record or whether it constituted trade secret information. The
court ruled that while "a conversation with a state employee is not enough to prevent
[alleged trade secrets] from being made available to anyone who makes a public records
request," documents submitted by a private party which constituted trade secrets as
defined in section 812.081, Florida Statutes, and which were stamped as confidential at
the time of submission to the state agency, were not subject to public access. Id. at 784
(emphasis supplied). Similarly, the report being sought from the City pursuant to the
pending records request was intentionally marked by Waste Pro as "Proprietary &
Confidential" and contains several pieces of data that Florida law describes as trade secret
information.
Notably, disclosing trade secret information willfully, knowingly, and without
authorization is a felony in the third degree, punishable by a term of imprisonment for up
to five years and fines up to $5,000.00. § 815.04, Fla. Stat. Alternatively, were the City
to take the position that Waste Pro's commercial report is exempt from disclosure under
the legal authority provided herein, the risk to the City and individual employees in
comparison is significantly less severe. That is, should the City's decision not to disclose
the report be subject to legal challenge, the report would likely be subject to review by a
court for an inspection in camera (in closed chambers). If the court determines that the
R. McLemore
December 23, 2008
Page 3
asserted exemption is inapplicable, it would order the report to be immediately produced
for inspection or copying as requested by the entity seeking access to the report. See §
119.071(1)(e), Fla. Stat. If the City's position that the report constitutes a trade secret is
found to be in error, the City may be responsible for reasonable attorneys' fees. § 119.12,
Fla. Stat. Additionally, knowing violations of the public records laws constitute
misdemeanors of the first degree. § 119.10(1)(b), Fla. Stat. However, under the
circumstances, there is no criminal intent on the part of the City employees to subvert the
public records laws given the complexity of this issue.
Recommendation
As you can discern, the City is faced with deciding between the lesser of two evils
and must balance the risks associated with each choice. However, because Waste Pro's
commercial report contains several characteristics described by Florida law as "trade
secrets," and considering that Waste Pro affirmatively marked the report "Proprietary &
Confidential" upon submitting the report to the City, I advise against disclosing the report
in response to the pending public records request. Furthermore, maintaining the
confidentiality of the report is consistent with the City's contractual obligations under its
Franchise Agreement with Waste Pro.
In refusing to disclose the report, the City should cite to sections 812.045 and
815.081, Florida Statutes, as its authorization to exempt this information from disclosure
under Florida's public records laws.
Please contact my office if you have any questions or desire to discuss this matter
further.
Very truly yours,
Kate Latorre
Assistant City Attorney
Cc: Andrea Lorenzo-Luaces, City Clerk
Michelle Greco, Finance Director