Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-14-2008 City Commission Regular Agenda Item 607 (Jan 14, 2008)REG iEdV ' JAB" 14 2008 CITY OF '::;:TER SPf INGs BROWN, GARGANESE, WEISS & UAGRE�F' A I'HAcITM �` R" Debra S. Babb-Nutcher° Joseph E. Blitch Usher L. Brown' Suzanne D'Agresta° Anthony A. Garganese° J.W. Taylor Jeffrey S. Weiss Board Certified Civil Trial Lawyer 'Board Certified City, County & Local Government Law Board Certified Appellate Practice Attorneys at Law Offices in Orlando, Kissimmee, Cocoa, Tara L. Barrett Ft. Lauderdale & Tampa Vivian P. Cocotas Scott J. Dornstein Robin Gibson Drage Mitchell B. Haller Katherine W. Latorre Terri E. Oster Amy J. Pitsch January 14, 2008 Via Hand Delivery The Honorable Mayor John F. Bush and Members of the City Commission 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708-6912 Erin J. O'Leary' Catherine D. Reischmann° William E. Reischmann, Jr. Of Counsel RE: City Commission Regular Agenda Item 607 (January 14, 2008) Dear Mayor and City Commission: I had an opportunity to review the proposed policy and procedures manual adopted by the Code Enforcement Board. For the most part, the policy and procedures manual is generally acceptable as to legal form and sufficiency. However, I have a few recommendations for the Code Enforcement Board: (1) Article III Jurisdiction should be amended to reflect that the Board has "non- exclusive" jurisdiction over "the enforcement of City Codes of the City of Winter Springs, Florida. (2) Regarding the attendance requirements set forth in Article VI, I recommend adding a sentence that states "Members of the Board may also be removed for cause as provided under the City Code." (3) The Abstention and Conflict of Interest paragraph on page 4 should be substantially revised because the proposed language does not comply with the provisions of Florida Law. For example, the manual does not state that a voting conflict of interest can occur if the special private gain or loss is to the parent organization or subsidiary of a corporate principal by which the Board Member is retained. In addition, appointed Board Members are not 225 East Robinson Street, Suite 660 • P.O. Box 2873 •Orlando, Florida 32802-2873 Orlando (407) 425-9566 Fax (407) 425-9596 • Kissimmee (321) 402-0144 • Cocoa (866) 425-9566 • Ft. Lauderdale (954) 670-1979 Website: www.oriandolaw.net • Email: firm@orlandolaw.net January 14, 2008 Page 2 allowed under Florida Law to participate in a matter on which they have a conflict of interest. (4) With respect to Article IX on Hearings, this article should be revised to provide the respondent an opportunity to cross examine the Code Enforcement Officer and his or her witnesses. In addition, the Code Enforcement Officer shall be afforded the same opportunity to cross examine the respondent and his or her witnesses. (5) Relative to Deliberations: (a) Respondent should not be found "guilty" or "not guilty". The respondent should be found "in violation" or "not in violation." (b) In some instances, it is appropriate to provide a time period for violators to come into compliance before a fine is established. This option is not listed. (c) Although the strict rules of evidence do not apply during a Code Enforcement proceeding, the proposed rules provide that the Chairman is responsible for allowing/disallowing evidence into the record. The proposed rules do not offer any standards by which that determination is made. In addition, disallowing evidence into the record could be very dangerous and result in a due process violation. In many cases, it is advisable to simply allow the evidence to be proffered and to weigh the evidence as to relevancy and materiality accordingly. Therefore, I recommend that paragraph C, Introduction of Evidence, be substantially revised to address my concerns. I look forward to discussing this matter during the City Commission Meeting. Ve u yours, Anthony A. Garganese City Attorney AAG/jf