Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017 12 05 Other, Document PresentationDate: December 8, 2017 The attached document was presented by AndCo Consulting during the Tuesday, December 5, 2017 Board of Trustees Regular Meeting in reference to Regular Agenda Item "500 ". June 30, 2017 Global Bond Asset Class Primer AndCo Consulting 1 (844) 44 -ANDCO I AndCoConsuldngxom Overview Why Extend a Bond Portfolio Beyond Core Domestic Issues? Diversification • Due to differences in business cycles across countries and industries, bond portfolio returns have the potential to be enhanced and /or risks (volatility) reduced through the inclusion of non - correlated fixed income investment assets. Risks • The inclusion of high yield bonds and /or bonds whose rates are not directly linked to the U.S. yield curve have the potential to provide higher current income and yield enhancement in certain market environments. Growth of the Global Credit Market • The increasing growth and opportunities within the global credit system offers investors a broader range of investment opportunities. Non -U.S. Dollar Bonds - Developed Market Opportunities • Increased Investment Opportunity — The U.S. bond market accounts for less than half of the global bond market. • Yield Curve /Business Cycle Differences — Including global bonds as part of diversified portfolio has the effect of de- coupling a portfolio's return pattern from the U.S. yield curve. • Market Structure — Investment managers have additional ways to diversify portfolios via allocations to non -U.S. debt by investing in undervalued currencies as well as by taking advantage of real interest rate differentials across countries. Risks • Currency Fluctuation — Returns can be significantly impacted by fluctuations in currency exchange rates. If this currency exposure remains un- hedged, it can lead to volatile results once returns are converted to U.S. dollars. • Geo- Political Concerns — In addition to the traditional default risk associated with all bonds, non -U.S. dollar denominated bonds are also subject to local sovereign risks such as political upheaval and economic instability. High Yield Bonds Opportunities • Enhanced Current Income — High yield bonds typically offer additional yield relative to treasury or investment grade corporate issues. • Capital Appreciation —A general economic upturn or specific improved company fundamentals can provide the potential for high yield bond price appreciation. As a result, market related events such as rating upgrades and improved earnings reports can push up the price of a high yield bond. • Relatively Low Duration — Due to the inherent risk in the securities, high yield bonds are typically issued with terms of less than 10 years and may be callable or putable after four or five years. This low duration reduces a bond's overall sensitivity to changes in interest rates. Risks • Default — By their very nature, high yield bond investing can be associated with meaningful default rates. Higher yields on these bonds represent compensation for that risk. • Credit Downgrade — Short of a default, deteriorating company fundamentals may cause an issue to be downgraded by a rating agency, which can reduce their market value. • Greater Economic Sensitivity — High yield issues are more sensitive to downturns in the economic cycle since such conditions may reduce a company's financial health. Non -U.S. Dollar Bonds - Emerging Market Opportunities • Enhanced Current Income — Emerging market bonds typically offer additional yield relative to developed market issues. • Capital Appreciation —As a sovereign credit issuer matures into a more developed economy, there is a potential for bond price appreciation. Market related events such as rating upgrades and strong economic activity can push up the price of emerging market bonds. • Yield Curve /Business Cycle Differences — Including emerging market bonds as part of diversified portfolio has the effect of de- coupling a portfolio's return pattern from the U.S. yield curve. Risks • Currency Fluctuation — Returns can be significantly impacted by fluctuations in currency exchange rates. If this currency exposure remains un- hedged, it can lead to volatile results once returns are converted to U.S. dollars. • Default — Emerging market bonds have historically experienced a higher default rate than those issued by their developed market counterparts. • Geo - Political Concerns — In addition to the traditional default risk associated with all bonds, non - dollar denominated bonds are also subject to local sovereign risks such as political upheaval and economic instability. Risk and Return Time Period: 2/1/2003 to 6/30/2017 12.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 E 3 N 0.0 0.0 2.0 Std Dev ■ Diversified Bond Portfolio' BBgBarc Gbl Agg Ex USD TR USD JPM GBI -EM Diversified Composite TR USD ■ 4.0 ■ 6.0 Global Diversified Bond Portfolio" BBgBarc US Corporate High Yield TR USD 8.0 10.0 Historical Returns of Diversified Bond Investing As of 6/30/2017 12.0 BBgBarc US Agg Bond TR USD JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD 14.0 'Diversified Bond Portfolio: 70% BbgBarc US Aggregate, 10% BbgBarc Global Aggregate ex US, 10% BbgBarc US Corporate High Yield, 5% JPM EMBI Global Diversified, 5% JPM GBI -EM Diversified + "Global Diversified Bond Portfolio: 33% BbgBarc Global Aggregate ex US, 33% BbgBarc US Corporate High Yield, 17% JPM EMBI Global Diversified, 17% JPM GBI -EM Diversified �)S"� Longest Common Period: 2/1/2003 - 6/30/2017 Trailing Returns As of 6/30/2017 13.5 N 12.8 12.0 11.3 0 10.5 9.8 M ai ei rn OR 9.0 00 00 8.3 N 7.5 o N � � M M M 6.8 M M 6.0 M c � 5.3 c (q U) U) U 4.5 v ry � o c 3.8 `n M N M O 3.0 C9 N In M M M N N N N 2.3 nj o0 1.5 � 0.8 O -- N 0.0 M M � -0.8 q q q -1.5 E -2.3 3 � N -3.0 N O ri -3.8 c ri -4.5 YTD 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years 4 Years 5 Years 7 Years 10 Years 15 Years 2/1/2003 - 6/30/2017' BBgBarc US Agg Bond TR USD BBgBarc Gbl Agg Ex USD TR USD BBgBarc US Corporate High Yield TR USD JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD JPM GBI -EM Diversified Composite TR USD M I ql� 65.0 60.0 55.0 50.0 45.0 40.0 35.0 30.0 25.0 u) N 20.0 1 v I� W I T7 M M M 15.0 �' M N N O W 10.0 rn c M o U� (O W 0.0 is ic, 1 1■ ■■ O M M M M -10.0 06 O -15.0 N -20.0 C 3 -25.0 d' -30.0 -35.0 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 BBgBarc USAgg Bond TR USD JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD 2009 2008 BBgBarc Gbl Agg Ex USD TR USD JPM GBI -EM Diversified Composite TR USD Calendar Year Returns As of 6/30/2017 O N LQ N V N N O � � N O M O O M N M G� O O N O o 00 � N O M M ■:� 1 ii■1 1 M 00 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 BBgBarc US Corporate High Yield TR USD Conclusions Diversification within a fixed income portfolio can provide a number of advantages over a traditional broad market bond portfolio including: • Current Income Enhancement • Potential Total Return Enhancement • Potential Risk (Volatility) Reduction in the form of Non - Correlated Return Patterns Although bond portfolio diversification is attractive, it is not without its risks including: • Increased Default Risk • Increased Sensitivity to Economic Cycles & Currency Fluctuations • Increased Sensitivity to Geo- Political Events In addition to the inclusion of global, high yield and emerging market securities in a traditional core domestic bond portfolio, many investors also use alternative bond strategies including: • Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) • Real Return Strategies (Commodities) • Hedge Funds Overview Investment Option Comparison Purpose for this Manager Evaluation Report Client is reviewing Global Fixed Income investment options. Investment Options for this Manager Evaluation Report Firm Name Strategy Name Vehicle Management Fee Brandywine Global Investment Management Loomis Sayles & Company Pacific Investment Management Company ( PIMCO) Franklin Templeton Investments Franklin Templeton Investments Legg Mason BW Global Opportunities I (GOBIX) MF 0.71% Loomis Sayles Fixed Income (LSFIX) MF 0.57% PIMCO Diversified Income Instl (PDIIX) MF 0.75% Templeton Global Bond R6 (FBNRX) MF 0.52% Templeton Global Total Return R6 (FTTRX) MF 0.70% Introduction As of 6/30/2017 m I ql� Asset Class Overview As of 6/30/2017 Definition and Characteristics The Global Bond category consists of fixed - income securities of both developed and emerging countries. The typical benchmarks for the category are the Bloomberg Barclays Multiverse Index and the Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Index. The Bloomberg Barclays Multiverse Index contains investment grade and high -yield bonds of 24 countries. Securities are generally fixed -rate, taxable bonds meeting basic criteria on minimum par amount, liquidity, and term to maturity. The index consists of almost 23,000 securities. Over 50% of the index is made of the highest rated securities and typically less than 5% is below investment grade. The sovereign treasury and government - related sectors dominate the index, accounting for approximately 80% of the total allocation. Corporate bonds represent over 15% of the overall sector composition. The US represents the largest country exposure (39 %), followed by Japan (17 %), and France (5 %). The Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Index, a component of the Multiverse Index, consists of over 20,000 securities, both senior and subordinated issues, including sovereign treasuries, government - related, and corporates. These securities can be denominated in one of 24 eligible currencies. Approximately 40% of the index is made of the highest -rated securities. The Global Aggregate index has a similar sector breakdown profile as its Multiverse counterpart. The main difference between the benchmarks is that all bonds in the Global Aggregate must be rated investment grade or higher. Role within a Portfolio The Global Bond category provides the portfolio exposure to bond markets around the world. Adding global fixed - income exposure to a portfolio offers diversification benefits compared to a strictly US- focused strategy. The Global Bond category provides diversification through exposures to currencies, interest rates, and countries with varying macroeconomic environments. Managers in the space typically invest a significant share of the total allocation to foreign bonds (usually 40% or more). The more conservative ones favor sovereign issues and high - quality instruments from developed markets while the more aggressive portfolios will own a higher percentage of lower- quality bonds, including high -yield US debt, and emerging markets securities. Benchmark and Peer Group This Global Bond search report will use the following benchmark and peer group Index — Bloomberg Barclays Multiverse Index: Represents the union of the Global Aggregate Index and Global High -Yield Index. The index consists of over 23,000 securities that are fixed -rate, taxable bonds meeting basic criteria on term to maturity and minimum amount outstanding. Foreign currencies must be freely tradable and hedgeable. Peer Group - Multisector Bond: Multisector -bond portfolios seek income by diversifying their assets among several fixed - income sectors, usually U.S. government obligations, U.S. corporate bonds, foreign bonds, and high -yield U.S. debt securities. These portfolios typically hold 35% to 65% of bond assets in securities that are not rated or are rated by a major agency such as Standard & Poor's or Moody's at the level of BB (considered speculative for taxable bonds) and below. *Brandywine's High Yield and Emerging Market Debt (EMD) exposure is limited to 15% each. Below investment grade for EMD is defined as any security rated belowA -. " PIMCO may invest in high yield securities subject to a maximum of 10% of assets in securities rated below B. j�T(7C Source: Investworks, eVestment Alliance, Morningstar Direct, Proprietary Database Investment Option Information As of 6/30/2017 Brandywine Global Investment Loomis Sayles & Co. Multisector Franklin Templeton Investments Franklin Templeton Investments Management Global Opportunistic Full Discretion PIMCO Diversified Income Global Bon Plus Global Multisector Plus Fixed Income Geographic Focus Global Global Global Global Global Sectors: Sovereign /Government Agency Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Corporate — Investment Grade Yes Yes Yes No Yes Corporate — High Yield Yes Yes Yes No Yes Securitized Yes Yes Yes No Yes Currency Hedging Unhedged to USD Unhedged to USD 25% Maximum Unhedged Unhedged to USD Unhedged to USD Yield Curve /Duration Active Active Active Active Active Country/Region Security Selection Sector Selection Currency Currency Drivers of Performance (Greatest to Least) Currency Sector Selection Security Selection Country/Region Country/Region Duration /Yield Curve Duration /Yield Curve Duration /Yield Curve Duration /Yield Curve Duration /Yield Curve Sector Selection Maximum Portfolio Allocation Below Investment Grade 30 %' 35% 10 %" 25% 50% Total Firm AUM ($ M) 71,744 257,581 1,615,965 742,836 742,836 Total Product AUM ($ M) 23,767 38,640 19,203 72,553 40,247 Fixed Income AUM ($ M) 55,075 206,869 1,535,215 288,742 288,742 Equity AUM ($ M) 15,901 50,712 35,144 311,989 311,989 Portfolio Managers 8 4 7 3 3 Research Analysts 13 84 57 63 145 Traders 6 47 - 8 15 Vehicles Available SA, CF, MF SA, CF, MF SA, MF SA, CF, MF SA, CF, MF Separate Account Annual Fee 45 bps (tiered) 50 bps (tiered) 50 bps (tiered) 45 bps (tiered) 45 bps (tiered) Commingled Fund Annual Fee 45 bps (tiered) 57 bps (tiered) 62 bps (tiered) 62 bps (tiered) Mutual Fund Annual Fee 58 bps 57 bps 75 bps 52 bps 70 bps Mutual Fund Name Legg Mason BW Global Loomis Sayles Fixed Income PIMCO Diversified Income Instl Templeton Global Bond R6 Templeton Global Total Return R6 Opportunities Bond IS Mutual Fund TICKER GOBSX LSFIX PDIIX FBNRX FTTRX *Brandywine's High Yield and Emerging Market Debt (EMD) exposure is limited to 15% each. Below investment grade for EMD is defined as any security rated belowA -. " PIMCO may invest in high yield securities subject to a maximum of 10% of assets in securities rated below B. j�T(7C Source: Investworks, eVestment Alliance, Morningstar Direct, Proprietary Database Correlation Matrix As of 6/30/2017 Correlation Matrix Time Period: 10/1/2008 to 6/30/2017 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 Legg Mason BW Global Opportunities Bd 1 1.00 2 Loomis Sayles Fixed Income 0.84 1.00 3 PIMCO Diversified Inc Instl 0.84 0.93 1.00 4 Templeton Global Bond R6 0.62 0.69 0.66 1.00 5 Templeton Global Total Return R6 0.67 0.77 0.73 0.98 1.00 6 S &P 500 TR USD 0.57 0.77 0.67 0.66 0.69 1.00 7 MSCI EAFE NR USD 0.71 0.85 0.79 0.71 0.77 0.89 1.00 8 MSCI EM NR USD 0.79 0.88 0.83 0.74 0.78 0.81 0.88 1.00 9 BBgBarc US Agg Bond TR USD 0.61 0.38 0.53 0.18 0.23 0.02 0.14 0.22 1.00 10 BBgBarc Gbl Agg Ex USD TR USD 0.81 0.65 0.63 0.44 0.50 0.42 0.59 0.60 0.59 1.00 11 BBgBarc US Corporate High Yield TR USD 0.69 0.92 0.88 0.58 0.67 0.70 0.76 0.80 0.23 0.43 1.00 12 JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD 0.82 0.85 0.91 0.59 0.65 0.56 0.68 0.76 0.61 0.65 0.76 1.00 13 JPM GBI -EM Diversified Composite TR USD 0.87 0.82 0.80 0.77 0.80 0.66 0.79 0.86 0.43 0.76 0.66 0.82 1.00 14 BBgBarc Multiverse TR USD 0.84 0.68 0.70 0.45 0.51 0.41 0.57 0.60 0.73 0.98 0.46 0.72 0.77 1.00 Longest Common Period: 10/1/2008 - 6/30/2017 m I ql� Morningstar Direct does not provide fundamental data on Bloomberg Barclays' fixed income indices. ) + Current Portfolio Comparison As of 6/30/2017 Legg Templeton Mason Loomis PIMCO Templeton Global BW Sayles Diversified Global Total Global Fixed Inc Bond Return Opportunities Income Instl R6 R6 Bd I COMPOSITION # of Holdings 73 378 1,067 134 159 %Asset in Top 10 Holdings 40.19 12.78 56.41 29.14 25.95 Asset Alloc Cash % 7.55 16.70 24.70 31.22 27.86 Asset Alloc Equity % 0.00 2.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 AssetAlloc Bond % 89.33 70.89 189.68 68.12 69.23 Asset Alloc Other % 3.12 10.35 1.91 1.13 3.74 STATISTICS Average Eff Duration 5.95 3.70 5.49 0.28 0.12 Average Eff Maturity 5.52 9.05 3.80 3.80 Average Coupon 4.41 5.49 3.92 8.72 8.52 Yield to Maturity 4.47 9.93 Average Credit Quality BBB BB BB BB SECTOR ALLOCATION Government % 59.17 14.56 31.84 66.88 69.08 Government Related % 4.78 2.07 40.68 0.00 0.00 Municipal Taxable % 0.56 0.67 0.84 0.00 0.00 Municipal Tax - Exempt % 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bank Loan % 0.00 0.07 2.41 0.00 0.00 Corporate Bond % 21.27 55.81 38.40 1.10 -0.16 Agency Mortgage- Backed % 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 Non -Ag. Res. Mortgage- Backed % 0.43 0.20 5.94 0.00 0.00 Commercial Mortgage- Backed % 0.00 0.09 15.95 0.00 0.00 Asset - Backed % 0.00 0.45 8.94 0.00 0.00 Cash & Equivalents % 7.55 16.70 -89.63 31.22 27.86 Morningstar Direct does not provide fundamental data on Bloomberg Barclays' fixed income indices. ) + Current Portfolio Comparison As of 6/30/2017 Legg 7.94 0.00 0.49 0.00 20.93 Maturity 1 -3 Yr % 21.01 13.67 Templeton Mason Loomis PIMCO Templeton 10.12 BW Sayles Diversified Global Global Global Fixed Inc Bond Total 18.29 14.43 14.69 11.18 Return Opportunities Income Instl R6 R6 Bd I Maturity 15 -20 Yr % 1.98 7.31 5.14 MATURITY DISTRIBUTION 7.94 0.00 0.49 0.00 20.93 Maturity 1 -3 Yr % 21.01 13.67 35.78 12.78 14.25 Maturity 3 -5 Yr % 6.56 10.12 53.62 17.86 15.52 Maturity 5 -7 Yr % 2.90 9.53 20.74 11.44 12.15 Maturity 7 -10 Yr % 18.29 14.43 14.69 11.18 12.77 Maturity 10 -15 Yr % 6.05 6.42 9.34 5.54 5.16 Maturity 15 -20 Yr % 1.98 7.31 5.14 1.52 1.15 Maturity 20 -30 Yr % 24.30 6.59 11.55 0.64 0.34 Maturity 30+ Yr % 2.80 1.12 13.79 0.09 0.00 QUALITY DISTRIBUTION Credit Qual AAA % Credit Qual AA % Credit Qual A % Credit Qual BBB % Credit Qual BB % Credit Qual B % Credit Qual Below B % Credit Qual Not Rated % 21.34 7.94 0.00 0.49 0.00 20.93 1.84 0.00 11.94 8.52 32.23 18.39 19.00 21.57 20.44 15.10 28.31 39.00 33.51 30.08 9.28 23.62 25.00 21.71 23.87 0.74 12.12 14.00 10.78 15.34 0.24 4.17 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 3.62 0.00 0.00 1.76 Historical Number of Holdings 1,800.0 1,600.0 1,400.0 N 1,200.0 m 6 1,000.0 x 0 �* 800.0 600.0 400.0 200.0 V 0.0 2009 2011 2013 Historical Cash Allocation 600.0 500.0 m 0 J 400.0 t N U 0 300.0 Q N Q 200.0 100.0 0.0 2009 2011 Legg Mason BW Global Opportunities Bd I Templeton Global Bond R6 Historical Portfolio Characteristics Comparison As of 6/30/2017 Historical Percentage of Assets in Top 10 Holdings 120.0 100.0 N 01 80.0 O x 0 a 60.0 N 40.0 N Q 0 20.0 0.0 -20.0 2015 2017 Historical Effective Maturity 20.0 17.5 15.0 3 12.5 W rn 10.0 m d Q 7.5 5.0 2.5 0.0 2013 2015 2017 – Loomis Sayles Fixed Income — Templeton Global Total Return R6 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 PIMCO Diversified Inc Instl Historical Average Effective Duration 8.0 7.0 6.0 0 5.0 0 w 4.0 d m 3.0 Q 2.0 1.0 0.0 -1.0 2009 Historical Yield to Maturity 10.0 8.0 t- 3 m 6.0 0 d } 4.0 2.0 0.0 2009 2011 Legg Mason BW Global Opportunities Bd I Templeton Global Bond R6 2011 2013 2015 Historical Average Coupon 9.0 8.3 7.5 0 a 0 0 U 6.8 d m m d Q 6.0 5.3 4.5 3.8 2017 2013 Historical Portfolio Characteristics Comparison As of 6/30/2017 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 Historical Highly Speculative Exposure 12.0 10.0 m 8.0 O d m m 6.0 d U 4.0 2.0 0.0 2015 2017 2009 Loomis Sayles Fixed Income Templeton Global Total Return R6 2011 2013 2015 2017 PIMCO Diversified Inc Instl 3 9 q,� Current Portfolio Region Allocation Portfolio Date: 3/31/2017 Templeton Loomis Legg Templeton Mason Sayles BW Global Global Fixed Opportunities Bond Bd I Fixed -Inc Country United States % 48.31 North America % 50.54 Latin America % 11.20 United Kingdom % 0.00 Europe dev % 10.26 Europe emrg % 8.13 Japan % 0.00 Australasia % 14.31 Asia dev % 3.91 Asia emrg % 0.00 Africa /Middle East % 1.65 Developed % 79.94 Emerging % 20.06 Historical US Portfolio Exposure 70.0 60.0 z N 50.0 d m 40.0 d 30.0 U 20.0 U C 10.0 X_ LL 0.0 2007 2008 Legg Mason BW Global Opportunities Bd I Templeton Global Bond R6 Current and Historical Portfolio Region Exposure As of 6/30/2017 2009 2010 2011 Loomis Sayles Fixed Income - Templeton Global Total Return R6 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 PIMCO Diversified Inc Instl Templeton Loomis PIMCO Templeton Sayles Diversified Global Global Fixed Inc Bond Total Income Instl R6 Return R6 66.82 52.20 0.00 0.00 77.42 52.42 0.00 0.00 5.46 19.78 58.12 57.91 3.13 5.97 0.00 0.00 9.34 16.08 1.18 3.61 0.00 0.41 4.75 6.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.30 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.15 7.00 2.73 0.27 2.37 28.04 25.01 0.99 2.81 0.92 4.36 95.10 82.14 8.66 6.34 4.90 17.86 91.34 93.66 2009 2010 2011 Loomis Sayles Fixed Income - Templeton Global Total Return R6 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 PIMCO Diversified Inc Instl Quantitative Review Peer Group (5 -95 %): Separate Accounts /CITs - U.S. - World Bond 12.0 • 11.0 10.0 9.0 8.0 7.0 6.0 • 3 5.0 • • • � 4.0 111111 • 3.0 • • 2.0 • 1.0 • • 0.0 -1.0 • • -2.0 -3.0 -4.0 QTD 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years 4 Years Calendar Year Performance As of 6/30/2017 6A 5 Years 6 Years 7 Years 8 Years 9 Years 10 Years Legg Mason BW Global Opportunities Bd I Templeton Global Bond R6 Loomis Sayles Fixed Income 40 Templeton Global Total Return R6 PIMCO Diversified Inc Instl ■ BBgBarc Multiverse TR USD QTD Rank 1 Year Rank 2 Years Rank 3 Years Rank 4 Years Rank 5 Years Rank 6 Years Rank 7 Years Rank 8 Years Rank 9 Years Rank 10 Years Rank Legg Mason BW Global Opportunities Bd 1 4.29 9 4.41 20 4.67 17 1.02 37 2.72 37 2.95 33 3.78 27 5.21 16 6.30 18 5.38 29 5.85 19 Loomis Sayles Fixed Income 2.54 57 8.73 7 5.30 9 2.08 27 4.87 15 5.71 6 5.55 9 7.00 4 8.66 3 7.08 7 6.76 7 PIMCO Diversified Inc Instl 2.35 61 8.68 7 7.14 2 4.49 8 5.83 4 5.31 7 5.65 9 6.53 5 8.47 4 7.45 4 6.92 7 Templeton Global Bond R6 -1.26 98 10.60 3 2.98 69 1.47 33 2.95 33 3.88 22 3.03 37 4.50 31 5.64 29 6.46 12 6.47 10 Templeton Global Total Return R6 -0.99 96 11.81 1 3.62 45 1.65 31 3.16 29 4.72 15 3.91 27 5.65 12 7.13 9 BBgBarc Multiverse TR USD 2.64 54 -1.38 75 3.50 50 -0.16 64 1.75 61 1.05 69 1.34 70 2.64 75 3.00 77 2.94 76 3.85 76 Legg Mason BW Global Opportunities Bd I Templeton Global Bond R6 Loomis Sayles Fixed Income 40 Templeton Global Total Return R6 PIMCO Diversified Inc Instl ■ BBgBarc Multiverse TR USD Peer Group (5 -95 %): Separate Accounts /CITs - U.S. - World Bond 40.0 35.0 30.0 25.0 20.0 E 15.0 3 10.0 • 5.0 •' 0.0 -5.0 -10.0 -15.0 -20.0 YTD 2016 2015 2014 • • 2013 2012 2011 2010 • Calendar Year Performance As of 6/30/2017 2009 2008 2007 Legg Mason BW Global Opportunities Bd I Templeton Global Bond R6 Loomis Sayles Fixed Income 40 Templeton Global Total Return R6 PIMCO Diversified Inc Instl ■ BBgBarc Multiverse TR USD YTD Rank 2016 Rank 2015 Rank 2014 Rank 2013 Rank 2012 Rank 2011 Rank 2010 Rank 2009 Rank 2008 Rank 2007 Rank Legg Mason BW Global Opportunities Bd 1 9.93 2 4.91 28 -8.63 92 6.13 20 -4.04 85 13.16 17 7.79 15 13.03 11 20.96 11 -8.93 86 9.93 34 Loomis Sayles Fixed Income 5.78 34 9.94 5 -6.03 82 4.62 31 6.88 2 15.65 7 3.90 71 12.90 11 35.85 3 -17.78 95 9.16 53 PIMCO Diversified Inc Instl 5.67 34 10.56 4 1.26 9 2.96 42 -0.91 42 14.98 8 4.42 65 14.26 6 31.57 7 -13.34 93 3.97 84 Templeton Global Bond R6 3.37 70 6.78 14 -3.91 59 1.97 52 2.36 14 15.81 6 -2.37 99 12.68 13 18.86 20 6.28 23 10.86 21 Templeton Global Total Return R6 3.53 68 8.81 8 -4.53 68 0.73 71 3.86 6 19.31 1 -0.91 96 15.31 2 24.18 8 BBgBarc Multiverse TR USD 4.58 51 2.84 55 -3.29 47 0.48 76 -2.19 56 4.84 80 5.55 43 5.84 76 8.03 72 3.76 36 9.23 53 Legg Mason BW Global Opportunities Bd I Templeton Global Bond R6 Loomis Sayles Fixed Income 40 Templeton Global Total Return R6 PIMCO Diversified Inc Instl ■ BBgBarc Multiverse TR USD Rolling Return Analysis As of 6/30/2017 Rolling Returns Time Period: 7/1/2007 to 6/30/2017 Rolling Window: 3 Years 3 Months shift Calculation Benchmark: BBgBarc Multiverse TR USD 20.0 15.0 C 10.0 d 5.0 0.0 -5.0 — 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Rolling Return Rankings Time Period: 7/1/2007 to 6/30/2017 Rolling Window: 3 Years 3 Months shift Calculation Benchmark: BBgBarc Multiverse TR USD 1 st to 25th Percentile 26th to Median 51 st to 75th Percentile 76th to 100th Percentile 0.0 i 25.0 C �i 50.0 N 75.0 100.0 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Legg Mason BW Global Opportunities Bd I Loomis Sayles Fixed Income PIMCO Diversified Inc Instl Templeton Global Bond R6 — Templeton Global Total Return R6 — BBgBarc Multiverse TR USD Rolling Excess Returns Time Period: 7/1/2007 to 6/30/2017 Rolling Window: 3 Years 3 Months shift Calculation Benchmark: BBgBarc Multiverse TR USD 12.5 / 10.0 / 7.5 d N 5.0 N N U W 2.5 0.0 -2.5 — 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 2011 2012 2013 2014 12015 2016 2017 Rolling Excess Return Analysis As of 6/30/2017 Rolling Excess Return Rankings Time Period: 7/1/2007 to 6/30/2017 Rolling Window: 3 Years 3 Months shift Calculation Benchmark: BBgBarc Multiverse TR USD 1 st to 25th Percentile 26th to Median 51 st to 75th Percentile 76th to 100th Percentile 0.0 25.0 50.0 / N N N W � /75.0 �\ 100.0 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Legg Mason BW Global Opportunities Bd I Loomis Sayles Fixed Income PIMCO Diversified Inc Instl Templeton Global Bond R6 — Templeton Global Total Return R6 — BBgBarc Multiverse TR USD Rolling Risk Analysis As of 6/30/2017 Rolling Standard Deviation Time Period: 7/1/2007 to 6/30/2017 Rolling Window: 3 Years 3 Months shift Calculation Benchmark: BBgBarc Multiverse TR USD 14.0 12.0 10.0 d 8.0 U) 6.0 4.0 2.0 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Rolling Standard Deviation Rankings Time Period: 7/1/2007 to 6/30/2017 Rolling Window: 3 Years 3 Months shift Calculation Benchmark: BBgBarc Multiverse TR USD 1 st to 25th Percentile 26th to Median 51 st to 75th Percentile 76th to 100th Percentile 0.0 25.0 0 50.0 U) 75.0 100.0 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Legg Mason BW Global Opportunities Bd I Loomis Sayles Fixed Income PIMCO Diversified Inc Instl Templeton Global Bond R6 — Templeton Global Total Return R6 — BBgBarc Multiverse TR USD Rolling Risk Analysis As of 6/30/2017 Rolling Tracking Error Time Period: 7/1/2007 to 6/30/2017 Rolling Window: 3 Years 3 Months shift Calculation Benchmark: BBgBarc Multiverse TR USD 12.0 10.0 0 8.0 w` 6.0 Y U (6 4.0 2.0 0.0 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Rolling Tracking Error Rankings Time Period: 7/1/2007 to 6/30/2017 Rolling Window: 3 Years 3 Months shift Calculation Benchmark: BBgBarc US Agg Bond TR USD 1 st to 25th Percentile 26th to Median 51 st to 75th Percentile 76th to 100th Percentile 0.0 25.0 `o w` m 50.0 Y U (6 H 75.0 100.0 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 09 12 03 06 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Legg Mason BW Global Opportunities Bd I Loomis Sayles Fixed Income PIMCO Diversified Inc Instl Templeton Global Bond R6 — Templeton Global Total Return R6 — BBgBarc US Agg Bond TR USD Risk - Reward: 3 -Year Time Period: 7/1/2014 to 6/30/2017 Calculation Benchmark: BBgBarc Multiverse TR USD 6.0 5.0 4.0 E 3.0 3 N 2.0 1.0 0.0 -1.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 Risk - Reward: 7 -Year Time Period: 7/1/2010 to 6/30/2017 Calculation Benchmark: BBgBarc Multiverse TR USD 10.0 8.0 6.0 d 4.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 Std Dev Legg Mason BW Global Opportunities Bd I Templeton Global Bond R6 6.0 8.0 10.0 Std Dev Risk - Reward: 5 -Year Time Period: 7/1/2012 to 6/30/2017 Calculation Benchmark: BBgBarc Multiverse TR USD 7.0 6.0 5.0 E 4.0 3 N 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 Risk and Reward As of 6/30/2017 Risk - Reward: 10 -Year Time Period: 7/1/2007 to 6/30/2017 Calculation Benchmark: BBgBarc Multiverse TR USD A 6.0 � 4.0 Loomis Sayles Fixed Income 4D Templeton Global Total Return R6 2.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 Std Dev 2.0 4.0 6.0 Std Dev PIMCO Diversified Inc Instl ■ BBgBarc Multiverse TR USD 8.0 10.0 m I ql� Up and Down Market Capture: 3 -Year Time Period: 7/1/2014 to 6/30/2017 Calculation Benchmark: BBgBarc Multiverse TR USD 150.0 120.0 0 m 90.0 d a 60.0 CU U a 30.0 0.0 -30.0 -60.0 -30.0 0.0 30.0 60.0 90.0 120.0 150.0 Down Capture Ratio Up and Down Market Capture: 7 -Year Time Period: 7/1/2010 to 6/30/2017 Calculation Benchmark: BBgBarc Multiverse TR USD 150.0 120.0 0 90.0 0 m U 60.0 a D 30.0 0.0 Up and Down Market Capture As of 6/30/2017 Up and Down Market Capture: 5 -Year Time Period: 7/1/2012 to 6/30/2017 Calculation Benchmark: BBgBarc Multiverse TR USD 150.0 120.0 0 90.0 0 m U 60.0 D 30.0 0.0 -50.0 -20.0 10.0 40.0 70.0 Down Capture Ratio Up and Down Market Capture: 10 -Year Time Period: 7/1/2007 to 6/30/2017 Calculation Benchmark: BBgBarc Multiverse TR USD 140.0 120.0 .0 100.0 80.0 a �j 60.0 a D 40.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 120.0 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 Down Capture Ratio Down Capture Ratio Legg Mason BW Global Opportunities Bd I Loomis Sayles Fixed Income PIMCO Diversified Inc Instl Templeton Global Bond R6 4D Templeton Global Total Return R6 ■ BBgBarc Multiverse TR USD 100.0 130.0 100.0 120.0 140.0 m I ql� Time Period: 7/1/2014 to 6/30/2017 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 -0.1 -0.2 -0.3 -0.4 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 -0.5 -1.0 -1.5 -2.0 Multi Statistic Analysis As of 6/30/2017 0.9 8.0 Legg Mason BW Global Opportunities Bd I Sharpe 8.5 7.5 8.0 7.0 Loomis Sayles Fixed Income 6.5 7.5 6.0 PIMCO Diversified Inc Instl 5.5 7.0 5.0 4.5 Templeton Global Bond R6 0.3 Error 4.0 6.0 3.5 Templeton Global Total Return R6 0.1 37 3.0 -0.0 2.5 ■ BBgBarc Multiverse TR USD 2.0 Time Period: 7/1/2014 to 6/30/2017 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 -0.1 -0.2 -0.3 -0.4 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 -0.5 -1.0 -1.5 -2.0 Multi Statistic Analysis As of 6/30/2017 0.9 9.0 0.8 Sharpe 8.5 0.7 8.0 0.6 Ir Rank Tracking 7.5 0.5 7.0 0.4 6.5 0.3 Error 6.0 0.2 8 0.1 37 5.5 -0.0 0.27 5.0 -0.1 4.5 -0.2 4.0 -0.3 z s -0.4 40 •40 0 3.0 -0.5 -0.6 2.5 2.0 -0.7 -0.8 1.5 -0.9 L 1.0 ip- -1.0 0.5 F Information Ratio 3 Yr Tracking Error 3 Yr Std Dev Rank Sharpe Rank Alpha Rank Information Rank Tracking Rank Ratio Ratio Error Legg Mason BW Global Opportunities Bd 1 7.64 8 0.10 37 1.42 34 0.27 41 4.33 31 Loomis Sayles Fixed Income 5.26 49 0.35 31 2.12 27 0.49 34 4.55 27 PIMCO Diversified Inc Instl 4.89 64 0.87 15 4.42 8 1.02 9 4.55 27 Templeton Global Bond R6 6.56 25 0.18 35 1.37 34 0.19 47 8.57 1 Templeton Global Total Return R6 6.91 19 0.20 34 1.59 31 0.21 47 8.65 1 BBgBarc Multiverse TR USD 5.02 59 -0.08 64 0.00 64 0.00 100 Time Period: 7/1/2012 to 6/30/2017 1.5 5.5 1.4 5.0 1.3 4.5 1.2 4.0 1.1 3 1.0 .5 3.0 0.9 0.8 2.5 0.7 2.0 0.6 1.5 0.5 1.0 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.0 0.2 -0.5 0.1 -0.0 -1.0 -0.1 -1.5 -0.2 -2.0 Sharpe Ratio 5 Yr 1.2 1.1 1.0 40 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 Alpha 5 Yr -0.0 -0.1 -0.2 -0.3 -0.4 -0.5 -0.6 -0.7 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 10 Multi Statistic Analysis As of 6/30/2017 0 • 0 0.5 r Tracking Error 5 Yr 7.3 Legg Mason BW Global Opportunities Bd 1 7.0 Rank 6.8 Rank 6.5 Rank 6.3 Loomis Sayles Fixed Income 6.0 5.8 Ratio 5.5 5.3 PIMCO Diversified Inc Instl 5.0 Error 4.8 Legg Mason BW Global Opportunities Bd 1 4.5 Templeton Global Bond R6 4.3 43 4.0 35 3.8 40 3.5 Templeton Global Total Return R6 3.3 5.15 3.0 1.07 2.8 4.80 2.5 ■ BBgBarc Multiverse TR USD 2.3 Time Period: 7/1/2012 to 6/30/2017 1.5 5.5 1.4 5.0 1.3 4.5 1.2 4.0 1.1 3 1.0 .5 3.0 0.9 0.8 2.5 0.7 2.0 0.6 1.5 0.5 1.0 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.0 0.2 -0.5 0.1 -0.0 -1.0 -0.1 -1.5 -0.2 -2.0 Sharpe Ratio 5 Yr 1.2 1.1 1.0 40 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 Alpha 5 Yr -0.0 -0.1 -0.2 -0.3 -0.4 -0.5 -0.6 -0.7 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 10 Multi Statistic Analysis As of 6/30/2017 0 • 0 0.5 r Tracking Error 5 Yr Std Dev Rank Sharpe Rank Alpha Rank Information Rank Tracking Rank Ratio Ratio Error Legg Mason BW Global Opportunities Bd 1 7.15 5 0.39 43 1.73 35 0.44 40 4.27 23 Loomis Sayles Fixed Income 5.15 46 1.07 19 4.80 10 1.14 7 4.09 27 PIMCO Diversified Inc Instl 4.99 49 1.03 20 4.45 11 1.05 11 4.04 27 Templeton Global Bond R6 6.11 23 0.61 32 3.66 19 0.39 42 7.18 1 Templeton Global Total Return R6 6.50 18 0.70 25 4.42 11 0.50 40 7.31 1 BBgBarc Multiverse TR USD 4.60 64 0.19 69 0.00 71 0.00 100 0 ■ Time Period: 7/1/2010 to 6/30/2017 Legg Mason BW Global Opportunities Bd I Loomis Sayles Fixed Income PIMCO Diversified Inc Instl Templeton Global Bond R6 Templeton Global Total Return R6 BBgBarc Multiverse TR USD 0 1.5 5.5 1.4 5.0 1.3 4.5 1.2 4.0 3.5 1.1 3.0 1.0 2.5 0.9 2.0 0.8 1.5 0.7 1.0 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.4 -0.5 0.3 -1.0 0.2 -1.5 0.1 -2.0 Sharpe Ratio 7 Yr I Alpha 1.0 8.0 0.9 7.5 0.8 7.0 • 0.7 6.5 0.6 6.0 0.5 5.5 0.4 5.0 0.3 4.5 0.2 4.0 0.1 3.5 -0.0 3.0 -0.1 2.5 -0.2 2.0 -0.3 1.5 -0.4 1.0 -0.5 - 0.5 r I I Information Ratio 7 Yr Multi Statistic Analysis As of 6/30/2017 Tracking Error 7 Yr 8.5 Legg Mason BW Global Opportunities Bd I 8.0 Information 7.5 Loomis Sayles Fixed Income 7.0 Std Dev 6.5 PIMCO Diversified Inc Instl 6.0 Alpha 5.5 5.0 Templeton Global Bond R6 Rank 4.5 Ratio 4.0 Templeton Global Total Return R6 Ratio 3.5 Error 3.0 BBgBarc Multiverse TR USD 2.5 Time Period: 7/1/2010 to 6/30/2017 Legg Mason BW Global Opportunities Bd I Loomis Sayles Fixed Income PIMCO Diversified Inc Instl Templeton Global Bond R6 Templeton Global Total Return R6 BBgBarc Multiverse TR USD 0 1.5 5.5 1.4 5.0 1.3 4.5 1.2 4.0 3.5 1.1 3.0 1.0 2.5 0.9 2.0 0.8 1.5 0.7 1.0 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.4 -0.5 0.3 -1.0 0.2 -1.5 0.1 -2.0 Sharpe Ratio 7 Yr I Alpha 1.0 8.0 0.9 7.5 0.8 7.0 • 0.7 6.5 0.6 6.0 0.5 5.5 0.4 5.0 0.3 4.5 0.2 4.0 0.1 3.5 -0.0 3.0 -0.1 2.5 -0.2 2.0 -0.3 1.5 -0.4 1.0 -0.5 - 0.5 r I I Information Ratio 7 Yr Multi Statistic Analysis As of 6/30/2017 Tracking Error 7 Yr Sharpe Information Tracking Std Dev Rank Rank Alpha Rank Rank Rank Ratio Ratio Error 7.15 21 0.71 36 2.07 32 0.64 23 4.00 31 6.07 34 1.13 22 4.62 9 0.99 3 4.41 24 5.19 62 1.23 16 4.44 9 0.98 3 3.95 31 7.75 8 0.56 55 3.01 22 0.25 59 7.43 4 8.24 3 0.67 43 3.90 14 0.40 49 7.63 3 4.97 65 0.50 69 0.00 74 0.00 100 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 5.0 - 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 -0.5 -1.0 -1.5 Alpha 10 Yr Multi Statistic Analysis As of 6/30/2017 0.7 9.5 Legg Mason BW Global Opportunities Bd 1 9.0 Rank 8.5 Loomis Sayles Fixed Income 8.0 0.5 7.0 7.5 6.5 7.0 Ratio PIMCO Diversified Inc Instl 6.0 6.5 Error 6.0 ■ Templeton Global Bond R6 5.5 5.5 0.3 5.0 5.0 0.2 4.5 34 Templeton Global Total Return R6 23 4.5 0.2 4.0 0.72 0.1 3.5 0.0 ■ BBgBarc Multiverse TR USD 3.0 6.72 8 3.0 Std Dev 10 Yr Time Period: 7/1/2007 to 6/30/2017 -0.1 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 5.0 - 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 -0.5 -1.0 -1.5 Alpha 10 Yr Multi Statistic Analysis As of 6/30/2017 0.7 8.0 0.6 Sharpe Rank 7.5 0.6 Information 0.5 7.0 0.5 6.5 0.4 Ratio 6.0 0.4 Error 0.3 8.66 5.5 0.3 53 5.0 0.2 0.39 34 5.13 23 4.5 0.2 9 0.72 0.1 4.0 0.0 3.5 -0.0 6.72 8 3.0 -0.1 34 -0.1 2.5 -0.2 2.0 -0.2 11 -0.3 1.5 -0.3 1.0 40 Information Ratio 10 Yr Tracking Error 10 Yr Std Dev Rank Sharpe Rank Alpha Rank Information Rank Tracking Rank Ratio Ratio Error Legg Mason BW Global Opportunities Bd 1 8.66 9 0.62 53 1.38 36 0.39 34 5.13 23 Loomis Sayles Fixed Income 8.66 9 0.72 31 3.17 21 0.43 25 6.72 8 PIMCO Diversified Inc Instl 7.21 34 0.89 25 3.67 16 0.55 11 5.60 17 Templeton Global Bond R6 8.28 21 0.72 32 3.87 16 0.34 37 7.62 7 Templeton Global Total Return R6 BBgBarc Multiverse TR USD 5.87 69 0.57 67 0.00 79 0.00 100 Batting Average Source Data: Monthly Return Calculation Benchmark: BBgBarc Multiverse TR USD 75.0 67.5 60.0 52.5 CU 45.0 rn 37.5 30.0 Co 22.5 15.0 7.5 0.0 3 Years 5 Years Drawdown Time Period: 7/1/2007 to 6/30/2017 Source Data: Monthly Return 0.0 -2.5 -5.0 -7.5 -10.0 -12.5 -15.0 -17.5 -20.0 -22.5 -25.0 2007 2008 2009 Legg Mason BW Global Opportunities Bd I Templeton Global Bond R6 1 2010 2011 Loomis Sayles Fixed Income Templeton Global Total Return R6 7 Years Batting Average and Drawdown As of 6/30/2017 2012 2013 2014 2015 PIMCO Diversified Inc Instl BBgBarc Multiverse TR USD 10 Years 2016 2017 MPT Statistics As of 6/30/2017 MPT Statistics: 3 -Year Time Period: 7/1/2014 to 6/30/2017 Calculation Benchmark: BBgBarc Multiverse TR USD Legg Templeton Mason Loomis PIMCO Templeton Global BBgBarc BW Sayles Diversified Global Total Multiverse Global Fixed Inc Bond Return TR US D Opportunities Income Instl R6 R6 BdI Return 1.02 2.08 4.49 1.47 1.65 -0.16 Excess Return 1.18 2.24 4.65 1.63 1.80 0.00 Std Dev 7.64 5.26 4.89 6.56 6.91 5.02 Beta 1.29 0.63 0.56 -0.11 -0.04 1.00 Tracking Error 4.33 4.55 4.55 8.57 8.65 0.00 Sharpe Ratio 0.10 0.35 0.87 0.18 0.20 -0.08 Alpha 1.42 2.12 4.42 1.37 1.59 0.00 Information Ratio 0.27 0.49 1.02 0.19 0.21 Batting Average 52.78 58.33 55.56 50.00 52.78 100.00 Up Capture Ratio 121.54 71.02 88.64 -11.38 -5.55 100.00 Down Capture Ratio 102.78 37.77 18.93 -33.93 -30.84 100.00 MPT Statistics: 5 -Year Time Period: 7/1/2012 to 6/30/2017 Calculation Benchmark: BBgBarc Multiverse TR USD Legg Templeton Mason Loomis PIMCO Templeton Global BBgBarc BW Sayles Diversified Global Total Multiverse Global Fixed Inc Bond Return TR US D Opportunities Income Instl R6 R6 BdI Return 2.95 5.71 5.31 3.88 4.72 1.05 Excess Return 1.89 4.66 4.26 2.83 3.67 0.00 Std Dev 7.15 5.15 4.99 6.11 6.50 4.60 Beta 1.28 0.73 0.70 0.16 0.23 1.00 Tracking Error 4.27 4.09 4.04 7.18 7.31 0.00 Sharpe Ratio 0.39 1.07 1.03 0.61 0.70 0.19 Alpha 1.73 4.80 4.45 3.66 4.42 0.00 Information Ratio 0.44 1.14 1.05 0.39 0.50 Batting Average 53.33 70.00 60.00 58.33 60.00 100.00 Up Capture Ratio 123.01 105.06 106.67 37.46 49.00 100.00 Down Capture Ratio 93.89 25.16 33.83 -23.91 -24.69 100.00 6T MPT Statistics As of 6/30/2017 MPT Statistics: 7 -Year Time Period: 7/1/2010 to 6/30/2017 Calculation Benchmark: BBgBarc Multiverse TR USD Legg Templeton Mason Loomis PIMCO Templeton Global BBgBarc BW Sayles Diversified Global Total Multiverse Global Fixed Inc Bond Return TR US D Opportunities Income Instl R6 R6 BdI Return 5.21 7.00 6.53 4.50 5.65 2.64 Excess Return 2.57 4.37 3.89 1.86 3.02 0.00 Std Dev 7.15 6.07 5.19 7.75 8.24 4.97 Beta 1.21 0.85 0.73 0.60 0.70 1.00 Tracking Error 4.00 4.41 3.95 7.43 7.63 0.00 Sharpe Ratio 0.71 1.13 1.23 0.56 0.67 0.50 Alpha 2.07 4.62 4.44 3.01 3.90 0.00 Information Ratio 0.64 0.99 0.98 0.25 0.40 Batting Average 58.33 66.67 61.90 52.38 55.95 100.00 Up Capture Ratio 128.15 115.56 105.84 78.71 94.27 100.00 Down Capture Ratio 95.57 45.92 39.86 35.47 38.04 100.00 MPT Statistics: 10 -Year Time Period: 7/1/2007 to 6/30/2017 Calculation Benchmark: BBgBarc Multiverse TR USD Legg Templeton Mason Loomis PIMCO Templeton Global BBgBarc BW Sayles Diversified Global Total Multiverse Global Fixed Inc Bond Return TR US D Opportunities Income Instl R6 R6 BdI Return 5.85 6.76 6.92 6.47 3.85 Excess Return 2.00 2.91 3.07 2.62 0.00 Std Dev 8.66 8.66 7.21 8.28 5.87 Beta 1.21 0.95 0.81 0.65 1.00 Tracking Error 5.13 6.72 5.60 7.62 0.00 Sharpe Ratio 0.62 0.72 0.89 0.72 0.57 Alpha 1.38 3.17 3.67 3.87 0.00 Information Ratio 0.39 0.43 0.55 0.34 Batting Average 56.67 62.50 60.83 52.50 100.00 Up Capture Ratio 121.97 107.09 102.68 90.25 100.00 Down Capture Ratio 103.96 66.03 56.42 43.34 100.00 6T Investment Option Narratives Firm Overview Founded in 1986, Brandywine Global Investment Management (BGIM) is an SEC - registered investment manager headquartered in Philadelphia, PA. Shortly after its founding, BGIM was acquired by Legg Mason, Inc. (ticker: LM) and became a wholly- owned, but independent subsidiary. Since the acquisition, the firm has maintained complete control over investments, hiring and compensation. Approximately 80% of the firm's assets under management are managed within fixed income and all strategies, whether equity or fixed income, are managed in a value style. The firm also maintains office locations in San Francisco, Singapore and an operating unit in London. Team Overview The Global Bond team, led by Managing Directors Stephen Smith and David Hoffman, manage all of the fixed income portfolios at BGIM, including the Global Opportunistic Fixed Income (GOFI) strategy. Smith and Hoffman have worked in the asset management business for almost 40 years and joined BGIM in 1991 and 1995, respectively. Smith and Hoffman are joined on the portfolio management team by PM /Sr. Analyst Jack McIntyre. While not a member of the portfolio management team, Director of Global Research Francis Scotland is a key member of the team as he oversees the macro research process at the firm. In addition to McIntyre and Scotland, the Global Bond team is comprised of five additional analysts, five traders, and four members of the credit team. Strategy Overview As with all of the BGIM fixed income portfolios, the GOFI strategy is managed according to a top -down, value oriented philosophy. The Global Bond team believes an active management approach to investing in fixed income is superior to a passive approach as bond indices are dominated by the largest issuers of debt, and therefore are poor guides to attractive areas of the market. In light of their philosophical views, BGIM seeks to establish broad, macro themes across a select number of countries with the goal of outperforming broad, global bond markets by 2% annually over rolling, five -year periods. The Global Bond team believes the best measure of value is real yield (nominal interest rates minus inflation). The reason for using real yields as the primary measure of value stems from a view that high, real yields boost income to investors and allows them to capture the mean - reversion properties of interest rates. It is this view of value that is the foundational element of BGIM's investment process. The process begins with the team conducting macroeconomic research to identify the countries and currencies with the most attractive risk - reward profile. The macro work has both a value component (real yield) and a fundamental component, which focuses on the information risk, policy considerations and business cycle of each country. Once BGIM has established its country and currency positions, the team will select securities that represent the best value within their established themes. The investment universe includes sovereign and corporate bonds as well as mortgage - backed securities. Smith and Hoffman are responsible for all decisions. Legg Mason BW Global Opportunities Bd I As of 6/30/2017 Expectations Over a full market cycle, the GOFI strategy should do well in many environments, including bull markets, bear markets and flat /non- trending markets. In bull markets, the investment team's practice of taking long duration positions when they see value. In bear markets, the strategy will potentially suffer, but the value orientation should mitigate the impact. In sideways markets, Brandywine's issue selection has proven to add value. The strategy will tend to lag the market in periods when overvalued countries or currencies drive performance In frothy markets, the strategy may lag due to the team's desire to focus on capital preservation in favor of higher returns. As with most value- oriented strategies, the portfolio will likely underperform when undervalued areas of the market remain below fair value for an extended period. The strategy tends to maintain a long- duration profile over time. The strategy will typically be overweight Sovereign bonds, but can tilt heavily in favor of Corporates when spreads widen. Points to Consider Smith and Hoffman are both in their mid -to -late 60's. There are no indications their retirement from the firm is imminent. Nevertheless, the succession process as well as the development of the second generation of investment professionals, especially McIntyre, should be closely monitored. As with all value managers, one of the greatest risks in investing early or buying into a value trap. BGIM is not immune to this risk as demonstrated by their poor performance in 2008. When future market declines occur, we believe the team has the skill and experience to find value in the markets and move accordingly. That said, during such times, we will monitor the strategy closely to understand their investment themes and reasoning behind any large tactical positions they own. Recommendation Summary Co- Portfolio Managers Stephen Smith and David Hoffman have served together managing this strategy for over 20 years. Overall, the depth and experience of this team is extensive. In the last 10+ years, BGIM has made over 15 additions to the team and experienced but three departures. We believe BGIM's value philosophy and skill at identifying undervalued opportunities has been a key strength and driver of the strategy's strong historical returns. We believe the degree to which the global bond team will act on their convictions is high and this should allow for continued outperformance over time. The willingness to act is evident in light of the team's practice of concentrating positions in 8 -16 countries versus 25+ for most global bond indices. Another area where they act on their convictions is the tactical use of corporate bonds (including high yield) and mortgage securities. Historically, when they have viewed the asset class as attractive, the weighting to spread product has grown to 30 -50% of the portfolio. Conversely, when they are negative, the weight has been near zero (2005 -06). Sector Quality Legg Mason BW Global Opportunities Bd I As of 6/30/2017 100% - 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% O� O) O) O� O� O� O� O$ 00 00 00 00 �O �O �O �O �� �^ �� �� �� �� �� �� �O �O �O �O �� �� � �� �� �� �b NO �O �O �O NO at eC; at �� �Q e� at �� eQ e� at �� eQ e� a� �� eQ e� at �� �Q eri at �� �Q �� at �� �Q eri, at �� �Q lip t �� ZQ erj 0�� 5 0 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Nh NO NO NO NO Source: Investworks, eVestment Alliance, Morningstar Direct, Proprietary Database • Other Non - Dollar Convertibles High Yield Corporates • Municipals ■ABS /CMBS • Non - Agency MBS • Invt Grad Corporates ■Agencies /Regionals ■ Govts /Sovereigns • Other • Not Rated • Below BBB /Baa • BBB /Baa ■A • AA /Aa • AAA/Aaa Kit Firm Overview Loomis Sayles & Company, LP is an SEC - registered investment advisor based in Boston, Massachusetts. Founded in 1926, Loomis is a subsidiary of Natixis Global Asset Management. The firm's client list includes a broad array of institutional investors. Today, the firm offers a broad line -up of fixed income and equity strategies, which are supported by over 100 employees dedicated to investment research. Team Overview Dan Fuss, Matt Eagan and Elaine Stokes manage the strategy. Fuss has over 55 years of experience in the investment industry and has been with Loomis since 1976. He is vice chairman of the firm's Board of Directors and manages multiple fixed income strategies at the firm. Eagan has been with Loomis since 1997 and has over 25 years of experience as either portfolio manager or analyst. Stokes joined Loomis in 1998 and has over 25 years of investment industry experience. All three co- manage Loomis' flagship Bond Fund, which was awarded the 2009 Morningstar Fund Manager of the Year award in the fixed income category. Strategy Overview The Multisector Full Discretion (MFSD) strategy seeks to achieve high total return through individual security selection using fundamental credit analysis from its fixed income research department, as well as input from various sector and macro teams. MSFD employs an opportunistic style, focusing on out of favor sectors of the fixed income markets to generate ideas. The strategy emphasizes a long -term view of market developments, with the intention being to hold securities through a cycle, as they improve fundamentally. MSFD does not focus on the benchmark as a starting point for portfolio construction. Instead, Loomis views the entire spectrum of fixed income markets as a global opportunity set from which to choose the most attractive total return opportunities, regardless of market sector. The performance objective of Loomis Sayles' Multisector Full Discretion strategy is to maximize total return while managing downside risk. In order to achieve this goal, the strategy utilizes a value- driven, opportunistic style that will buy securities across a broad universe, including Emerging Markets, Non -US dollar, Convertibles, Structured Finance, and High Yield. The investment process is comprised of top -down analysis and bottom -up research as they seek to identify attractive sectors and securities. This strategy will typically look much different from any global bond benchmark due to its benchmark agnostic style. The Fund may invest up to 35% of its assets in below investment -grade fixed - income securities (commonly known as "junk bonds ") and up to 20% of its assets in equity securities, such as common stocks and preferred stocks (with up to 10% of its assets incommon stocks). The Fund's fixed - income securities investments may include unrated securities (securities that are not rated by a rating agency) if Loomis Sayles determines that the securities are of comparable quality to rated securities that the Fund may purchase. The Fund may invest in fixed - income securities of any maturity. Loomis Sayles Fixed Income As of 6/30/2017 Expectations By and large, as credit goes, so goes this strategy. When credit spreads widen, this strategy will suffer. We take heart in the experience of the team to navigate spread movements as they've seen this story before. Further comforting is the fact that the team will grow conservative when markets dictate that they do so. They aren't credit perma - bulls. In 2014, the strategy briefly built a 16% stake in short -term Treasuries before quickly putting that money back into high yield when spreads widened. That trade hasn't played out in the strategy's favor as the subsequent Energy collapse hit high yield issuers the hardest, but the team has shown the ability to deftly navigate these waters before. This was evidenced by the strong winning position in Ford debt in 2009 when many pundits were predicting bankruptcy for the company that did not end up playing out as expected. Points to Consider Investors may not realize that the strategy can hold up to 20% equities and typically maintains a healthy allocation to dividend - paying equities. This can result in higher equity sensitivity than the investor may prefer, especially one investing with the mindset that this allocation will fill a dedicated fixed income slot in the portfolio. Dan Fuss' age might be of a concern to some investors. Fuss is almost 80 years old. This is less a concern to us given the succession plan that was put in place many years ago with the ascension of Stokes and Eagan. We also do not believe that Fuss's retirement is imminent, despite his advanced age. Recommendation Summary The Loomis Sayles Multisector Full Discretion portfolio continues to hold a sizable overweight to Corporate Bonds (IG & HY in aggregate), including Convertible Bonds and Prefereds. This is consistent with the portfolio's style and the culture at Loomis. The short -and near -term performance will be heavily influenced by the direction of credit spreads. The strategy is recommended for clients in search of yield who are OK with credit exposure. The strategy will maintain a volatility profile higher than peers given its credit, preferred, convertible bond and equity exposures The strategy should be viewed as a carve out within a dedicated asset allocation framework. Given the credit and equity sensitivity, the strategy will correlate much higher to equity benchmarks than it will to the Barclays Multiverse or Citigroup World Government Bond Indices. As a result, we believe clients should view this strategy as an opportunistic carve out within the plan structure as opposed to a stand alone fixed income allocation. Sector Quality 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% �at �JOSeeQeG�a� �OOSe �o �o �o NO Q ECG at �� eQ ECG at �� eQ ECG at J� eQ ECG at J� eQ �Ci 0� J� eQ �Ci 0� J� eQ eCi 0� J� eQ eCi at J� eQ eCi 0�� 5 0 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% ZQ e� 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 Source: Investworks, eVestment Alliance, Morningstar Direct, Proprietary Database Loomis Sayles Fixed Income As of 6/30/2017 • Other Non - Dollar Convertibles High Yield Corporates • Municipals ■ABS /CMBS • Non - Agency MBS • Invt Grad Corporates ■Agencies /Regionals ■ Govts /Sovereigns ■ Other • Not Rated • Below BBB /Baa ■ BBB /Baa ■A ■ AA /Aa ■ AAA/Aaa Kit Firm Overview Pacific Investment Management Company (PIMCO) was founded in Newport Beach, CA in 1971. PIMCO started as a subsidiary of Pacific Life Insurance Company to manage separate accounts for institutional clients. In 2000, PIMCO was acquired by Allianz, a global financial services company headquartered in Germany. PIMCO operates as a separate and autonomous subsidiary of Allianz. Today, the firm is one of the world's largest fixed income managers with a presence in every major bond market. PIMCO has offices in Newport Beach and 12 other global locations and manages over $1.4 trillion in client assets. Team Overview Daniel Ivascyn is the lead portfolio manager responsible for the Diversified Income Fund, and works in conjunction with Alfred Murata and Eve Tournier, and the Investment Grade Credit, Emerging Markets, High Yield, and Mortgage Backed Security specialist portfolio managers in constructing Diversified Income portfolios Additionally, PIMCO's Diversified Income team utilizes over 30 global corporate credit analysts who provide research coverage on a broad range of credits, with an emphasis on independent and original research. Strategy Overview The Diversified Income strategy is designed to provide investors with a comprehensive global credit solution. It is a multi- sector strategy that invests across a broad spectrum of global credit market sectors, including investment grade and high yield, corporate debt as well as emerging market debt. The allocation among each of these markets will vary based on PIMCO's assessment of global trends and relative valuations. This active and dynamic approach allows for increased responsiveness in asset allocation to changing economic and market conditions while remaining anchored by PIMCO's investment process and longer -term orientation. PIMCO's investment process stars with an annual Secular Forum at which PIMCO investment professionals from around the world gather with industry experts for a three -day discussion about the future of the global economy and financial markets. The goal of this forum is to look beyond the current business cycle and determine how secular forces will play out over the next three -to -five years. The Diversified Income team is responsible for implementing top down strategies developed at the Forum, as well as for developing bottom -up strategy by maintaining constant contact with the PIMCO specialist teams responsible for the sectors in the Diversified Income strategy's opportunity set. New investment ideas are sourced by individual team members and discussed in regularly scheduled strategy meetings. In evaluating new investment ideas, the team applies a number of qualitative and quantitative screens. The team also makes a full assessment of the fundamental credit factors underpinning an investment idea, incorporating the relevant credit analysis team into the discussion as needed. PIMCO Diversified Inc Instl As of 6/30/2017 Expectations PIMCO's investment philosophy seeks to add value in all market environments and circumstances. The philosophy of measured risk - taking across multiple concurrent strategies may deliver stable excess returns across different market conditions. At any one time, one or several of their strategies may be working to provide excess return. The disciplined style works to limit the likelihood that any single strategy that falls out of favor would negate the positive returns from other strategies. During periods of extreme volatility, PIMCO's investment philosophy may be deemed out of favor. During these periods, certain managers may accurately predict large movements in prices and subject the portfolio to more risk than PIMCO would. This would result in substantially higher returns than PIMCO could be expected to achieve. However, in volatile periods, large amounts of risk can also lead to substantial underperformance, which PIMCO's approach seeks to mitigate. Points to Consider As with most PIMCO strategies, assets under management and capacity are always considerations. With over $813 in ALIM, the strategy will employ liberal use of derivatives to manage portfolio exposures as it is often difficult, and sometimes impossible, for PIMCO to manage exposures in this fashion via the cash market. Therefore, clients need to be comfortable with the use of derivatives. In addition, accurately assessing what the strategy is invested in is problematic because the use of deriviates will often showcase unique and confusing portfolio exposures, such as negative cash balances and leverage (per 40 Act regulations, the strategy can be up to 30% levered). These are considerations clients need to assess to determine suitability. Recommendation Summary PIMCO's scale gives it a significant advantage when sourcing allocations to new issuance. In oversubscribed situations, PIMCO typically gets a sizeable allocation where smaller managers would be forced to source in the secondary market. Furthermore, the team's global credit resources compare favorably with best in class peers. The firm employs over 30 analysts located around the globe. These analysts internally rate every credit held across PIMCO portfolios. While this is a practice utilized by many peers, the depth and experience of the team give PIMCO a competitive advantage in this area. Finally, PIMCO's contacts within emerging markets are also a differentiator. The team operates out of multiple locations including Singapore, Munich, and Newport Beach. Analysts travel extensively to investigate opportunities around the globe. This "boots on the ground" orientation provides unique insights that less global firms are unable to secure. We believe that PIMCO is suitable for clients seeking a higher yielding alternative to core fixed income, and low correlation to G -3 government interest rates. The diversified approach looks to benefit from PIMCO's macroeconomic views on credit trends, global interest rates, duration, currencies, and curve positioning. This diversified approach aims to provide the potential for consistent outperformance over the long -term through relative value trades, especially compared to approaches that focus on a single asset class. Sector Quality 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% IME101 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% ^h..`O ^`O ^`O ^`O at ��c�eQQ�U�ac �O�g�Qp�G�`a� ��.��eQQ�U�ac ��.c�eQQ�U�ac ��.c�eQQeU�ac �J.c�eQQeU�ac �JC�eQQec; 0% -- O� 1.0 ^O ^O ^O ^O ZQ e'j 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 <D Source: Investworks, eVestment Alliance, Morningstar Direct, Proprietary Database PIMCO Diversified Inc Instl As of 6/30/2017 • Other Non - Dollar Convertibles High Yield Corporates • Municipals ■ABS /CMBS • Non - Agency MBS • Invt Grad Corporates ■Agencies /Regionals ■ Govts /Sovereigns • Other • Not Rated • Below BBB /Baa • BBB /Baa ■A • AA /Aa • AAA/Aaa Kit Firm Overview Founded in 1947, Franklin Resources, Inc. (operating worldwide as Franklin Templeton Investments) is one of the largest publicly- traded investment management companies in the world, with offices in over 35 countries and over 9,200 staff globally. The company is listed on the NY Stock Exchange under the ticker BEN, and is a constituent of the S &P 500 Index. Directors and officers of the firm own approximately 20% of the outstanding shares. In addition, management -level employees, as well as all portfolio managers and analysts, receive deferred Franklin Resources, Inc. stock as part of their compensation. Team Overview Michael Hasenstab, PhD, is the lead portfolio manager for the Global Bond Plus strategy. He is Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer of the Templeton Global Macro group and a member of the Fixed Income Policy Committee. Dr. Hasenstab specializes in global macroeconomic analysis, focusing on currency, interest rate, and sovereign credit analysis of developed and emerging market countries. He has ultimate decision - making authority for the strategy and is accountable for strategy implementation, including buy /sell decision and risk management. Sonal Desai is a co- portfolio manager for the strategy and participates in the decision - making process. She is focused on portfolio construction and implementation, analytics, and risk management. Desai also provides broad operational support including ensuring compliance with investment guidelines and local regulations, and managing portfolio flows. The Templeton Global Macro Group is actively involved in the management of Global Bond Plus and reports to Dr. Hasenstab. Strategy Overview Global Bond Plus seeks current income, with capital appreciation and growth of income, by investing at least 80% of its net assets in bonds of governments and government agencies located anywhere in the world. The strategy regularly uses various currency - related and other transactions involving derivative instruments. The strategy draws on the firm's global resources: top -down macroeconomic views, bottom -up country and sector research, as well as quantitative analysis and rigorous risk management. The group tailors the Fixed Income Policy Committee's macroeconomic investment themes, conducting fundamental, country-by- country macroeconomic research. To identify potential alpha sources and the most attractive risk exposures relative to current valuations, the group independently evaluates four sources of potential return: interest rate, currency, sovereign credit, and security selection. Positions are built to capitalize on short -term market inefficiencies, allowing for shifts reflecting anticipated changes in interest rates and credit spreads. The Global Macro group meets daily to discuss ongoing market activity, as well as political and macroeconomic events. The team meets weekly with Franklin Templeton's equity teams to discuss opportunities and developments across regions, countries, sectors and asset classes. The very broad, global perspective of Franklin Templeton's research process looks beyond the predominantly developed core markets that get the most attention to the peripheral markets which can not only provide excellent sources of diversification, but also offer higher return potential. Templeton Global Bond R6 As of 6/30/2017 Expectations The strategy will fare best in risk on environments and when global growth is improving or stable. When emerging markets outperform developed markets, the strategy should outperform. The strategy will fare worst in slow growth environments, when commodities are out of favor (due to the strategy's reliance on emerging market debt) and when developed markets outperform emerging markets. Hasenstab has been consistent in his view that global growth is better than most market participants appreciate. Therefore, the strategy has had a low duration profile for much of the past three years. We expect this low duration positioning to continue into the future, but we do not expect it to be consistent forever. Should Templeton's Global Macro team change its opinion on global growth, the strategy most likely will reverse its duration posture. Points to Consider The team that manages this strategy has shown a willingness to take risk. The investments have historically been of a contrarian nature, with investments in highly stressed Irish debt (2011), Ukrainian debt (2014) and more recently increasing its stake in the Mexico Peso (late 2015). Finally, the team has shown willingness to invest in less liquid areas (Uruguay & Ghana). This results in a strategy that does not resemble the Citigroup World Government Bond Index to which it is benchmarked. Furthermore, the strategy's five- and ten -year correlations tend to track far more closely to the MSCI EAFE equity index than they do to the benchmark, so the strategy is hard to place in an asset allocation framework as it acts more like an equity strategy than it does fixed income. Recommendation Summary The depth and experience of the team sets it apart from the competition. Hasenstab began his career at Templeton in 1995 and has worked his way up through the ranks, first as an emerging markets sovereign credit analyst, to his current role as Global Macro CIO which he ascended to in 2015. This most recent promotion separates Hasenstab and his team from the firm's taxable bond group and reinforces his importance to the broader organization. With the departure of Analyst Canyon Chan in 2014, the team has been relatively stable. Furthermore, the team has "boots on the ground" with specialists operating out of Templeton's foreign offices, which gives the team local insights that other firms may lack. While Franklin Templeton is an extremely large organization, each individual team within the organization operates independently and is given significant autonomy in areas such as hiring and training. These factors contribute to cohesion and have benefitted investment professional retention. Furthermore, the team's autonomy is reinforced by Hasenstab's ability to take large bets in this portfolio. He is willing to express his views and the firm gives him the ability to do so by maintaining a "hands off" approach. While not a strategy suitable for every investor, and appropriately placing this investment within the context of an asset allocation framework is challenging, we believe this strategy is a very compelling option for investors seeking a global, unconstrained approach. Sector Quality 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% �at �JOSeeQeG�a� �OOSe �o �o �o NO Q ECG at �� eQ ECG at �� eQ ECG at J� eQ ECG at J� eQ �Ci 0� J� eQ �Ci 0� J� eQ eCi 0� J� eQ eCi at J� eQ eCi 0�� 5 0 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% �O ZQ e� 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 Source: Investworks, eVestment Alliance, Morningstar Direct, Proprietary Database Templeton Global Bond R6 As of 6/30/2017 • Other Non - Dollar Convertibles High Yield Corporates • Municipals ■ABS /CMBS • Non - Agency MBS • Invt Grad Corporates ■Agencies /Regionals ■ Govts /Sovereigns ■ Other • Not Rated • Below BBB /Baa ■ BBB /Baa ■A ■ AA /Aa ■ AAA/Aaa Kit Firm Overview Founded in 1947, Franklin Resources, Inc. (operating worldwide as Franklin Templeton Investments) is one of the largest publicly- traded investment management companies in the world, with offices in over 35 countries and over 9,200 staff globally. The company is listed on the NY Stock Exchange under the ticker BEN, and is a constituent of the S &P 500 Index. Directors and officers of the firm own approximately 20% of the outstanding shares. In addition, management -level employees, as well as all portfolio managers and analysts, receive deferred Franklin Resources, Inc. stock as part of their compensation. Team Overview Michael Hasenstab, PhD, is the lead portfolio manager for the Global Multisector Plus strategy. He is Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer of the Templeton Global Macro group and a member of the Fixed Income Policy Committee. Dr. Hasenstab specializes in global macroeconomic analysis, focusing on currency, interest rate, and sovereign credit analysis of developed and emerging market countries. He has ultimate decision - making authority for the strategy and is accountable for strategy implementation, including buy /sell decision and risk management. Sonal Desai is a co- portfolio manager for the strategy and participates in the decision - making process. She is focused on portfolio construction and implementation, analytics, and risk management. Desai also provides broad operational support including ensuring compliance with investment guidelines and local regulations, and managing portfolio flows. The Templeton Global Macro Group is actively involved in the management of Global Multisector Plus and reports to Dr. Hasenstab. Strategy Overview Global Multisector Plus takes an unconstrained approach to global fixed income investing free of benchmark constraints. The strategy seeks total return by investing in government and government agencies bonds, corporate and mortgage credit in addition to currencies. The strategy draws on the firm's global resources: top - down macroeconomic views, bottom -up country and sector research, as well as quantitative analysis and rigorous risk management. The group tailors the Fixed Income Policy Committee's macroeconomic investment themes, conducting fundamental, country-by- country macroeconomic research. To identify potential alpha sources and the most attractive risk exposures relative to current valuations, the group independently evaluates four sources of potential return: interest rate, currency, sovereign credit, and security selection. Positions are built to capitalize on short -term market inefficiencies, allowing for shifts reflecting anticipated changes in interest rates and credit spreads. The Global Macro group meets daily to discuss ongoing market activity, as well as political and macroeconomic events. The team meets weekly with Franklin Templeton's equity teams to discuss opportunities and developments across regions, countries, sectors and asset classes. The very broad, global perspective of Franklin Templeton's research process looks beyond the predominantly developed core markets that get the most attention to the peripheral markets which can not only provide excellent sources of diversification, but also offer higher return potential. Templeton Global Total Return R6 As of 6/30/2017 Expectations The strategy will fare best in risk -on environments and when global growth is improving or stable. Given the wide breadth of investment opportunities, the strategy will maintain a yield advantage over commonly used benchmarks. The strategy will fare worst in slow growth environments, when commodities are out of favor (due to the strategy's reliance on emerging market debt and currencies) and when developed markets outperform emerging markets. Hasenstab has been consistent in his view that global growth is better than most market participants appreciate. Therefore, the strategy has maintained a low duration profile for much of the past three years. We expect this low duration positioning to continue into the future, but we do not expect it to be consistent forever. Should Templeton's Global Macro team change its opinion on global growth, the strategy most likely will reverse its duration posture. Points to Consider The team that manages this strategy has shown a willingness to take risk. The investments have historically been of a contrarian nature, with investments in highly stressed Irish debt (2011), Ukrainian debt (2014) and more recently increasing its stake in the Mexico Peso (late 2015). Finally, the team has shown willingness to invest in less liquid areas (Uruguay & Ghana). This results in a strategy that does not resemble the Barclays Multiverse Bond Index to which it is benchmarked. Furthermore, the strategy's five- and ten -year correlations tend to track far more closely to the MSCI EAFE equity index than they do to the benchmark, so the strategy is hard to place in an asset allocation framework as it acts more like an equity strategy than it does fixed income. Recommendation Summary The depth and experience of the team sets it apart from the competition. Hasenstab began his career at Templeton in 1995 and has worked his way up through the ranks, first as an emerging markets sovereign credit analyst, to his current role as Global Macro CIO which he ascended to in 2015. This most recent promotion separates Hasenstab and his team from the firm's taxable bond group and reinforces his importance to the broader organization. With the departure of Analyst Canyon Chan in 2014, the team has been relatively stable. Furthermore, the team has "boots on the ground" with specialists operating out of Templeton's foreign offices, which gives the team local insights that other firms may lack. While Franklin Templeton is an extremely large organization, each individual team within the organization operates independently and is given significant autonomy in areas such as hiring and training. These factors contribute to cohesion and have benefitted investment professional retention. Furthermore, the team's autonomy is reinforced by Hasenstab's ability to take large bets in this portfolio. He is willing to express his views and the firm gives him the ability to do so by maintaining a "hands off" approach. While not a strategy suitable for every investor, and appropriately placing this investment within the context of an asset allocation framework is challenging, we believe this strategy is a very compelling option for investors seeking a global, unconstrained approach. Sector 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% �at 1J�GjQ'eQQ'G�a` �J� Quality 100% O O O O a�O' e° 0�� 5 0 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% Vr 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Ib N NO NO ZQ z'j 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 Q Source: Investworks, eVestment Alliance, Morningstar Direct, Proprietary Database Templeton Global Total Return R6 As of 6/30/2017 • Other Non - Dollar Convertibles High Yield Corporates • Municipals ■ABS /CMBS • Non - Agency MBS • Invt Grad Corporates ■Agencies /Regionals ■ Govts /Sovereigns ■ Other • Not Rated • Below BBB /Baa ■ BBB /Baa ■A ■ AA /Aa ■ AAA/Aaa Kit Definitions Alpha - A measure of the difference between a portfolio's actual returns and its expected performance, is symmetric with skewness 0. given its level of risk as measured by beta. Sortino Ratio - The Sortino Ratio is similar to Sharpe Ratio except it uses downside risk (Downside Batting Average — A measure of a manager's ability to consistently beat the market. It is calculated by Deviation) in the denominator. It was developed in early 1980's by Frank Sortino. Since upside dividing the number of months in which the manager beat or matched an index by the total number of variability is not necessarily a bad thing, Sortino ratio is sometimes more preferable than Sharpe ratio. months in the period. Standard Deviation - A statistical measure of the range of a portfolio's performance. It represents the Best Quarter- This is the highest quarterly (3 month) return of the investment since its inception. variability of returns around the average return over a specified time period. Beta - A measure of the sensitivity of a portfolio to the movements in the market. It is a measure of the Tracking Error - This is a measure of the standard deviation of a portfolio's excess returns versus its portfolio's systematic risk. designated market benchmark. Down Period Percent - Number of months below 0 divided by the total number of months. Downmarket Capture Ratio - The ratio of average portfolio performance over the designated benchmark during periods of negative returns. A lower value indicates better product performance. Downside Std Dev - This measures only deviations below a specified benchmark. Excess Return- This is a measure of an investment's return in excess of a benchmark. Information Ratio - This calculates the value -added contribution of the manager and is derived by dividing the excess rate of return of the portfolio by the tracking error. The higher the Information Ratio, the more the manager has added value to the portfolio. Longest Down - Streak Return - Return for the longest series of negative monthly returns. Longest Down - Streak # of Periods - Longest series of negative monthly returns. Longest Up- Streak Return - Return for the longest series of positive monthly returns. Longest Up- Streak - Longest series of positive monthly returns. Kurtosis - Kurtosis indicates the peakedness of a distribution. For normal distribution, Kurtosis is 3. Max Drawdown - The peak to trough decline during a specific record period of an investment or fund. It is usually quoted as the percentage between the peak to the trough. Max Drawndown # of Periods - This is the number of months that encompasses the max drawdown for an investment. R- Squared - The percentage of a portfolio's performance that can be explained by the behavior of the appropriate benchmark. A high R- Squared means the portfolio's performance has historically moved in the same direction as the appropriate benchmark. Return - Compounded rate of return for the period. Sharpe Ratio - Represents the excess rate of return over the risk free return divided by the standard deviation of the excess return. The result is an absolute rate of return per unit of risk. A higher value demonstrates better historical risk - adjusted performance. Skewness - Skewness reflects the degree of asymmetry of a distribution. If the distribution has a longer left tail, the function has negative skewness. Otherwise, it has positive skewness. A normal distribution Treynor Ratio - Similar to Sharpe Ratio, Treynor Ratio is a measurement of efficiency utilizing the relationship between annualized risk - adjusted return and risk. Unlike Sharpe Ratio, Treynor Ratio utilizes "market" risk (beta) instead of total risk (standard deviation). Good performance efficiency is measured by a high ratio. Up period Percent - Number of months above 0 divided by the total number of months. Upmarket Capture Ratio - The ratio of average portfolio performance over the designated benchmark during periods of positive returns. A higher value indicates better product performance. Worst Quarter - This is the lowest quarterly (3 month) return of the investment since its inception. Disclosures AndCo compiled this report for the sole use of the client for which it was prepared. AndCo uses the results from this evaluation to make observations and recommendations to the client When client - specific performance is shown, AndCo uses time - weighted calculations, which are founded on standards recommended by the CFA Institute. In these cases, the performance- related data shown are based on information that is received from custodians. As a result, this provides AndCo with a reasonable basis that the investment information presented is free from material misstatement. The strategies listed may not be suitable for all investors. We believe the information provided here is reliable, but do not warrant its accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not an indication of future performance. Any information contained in this report is for informational purposes only and should not be construed to be an offer to buy or sell any securities, investment consulting, or investment management services. Additional information included in this document may contain data provided by index databases, public economic sources and the managers themselves This document may contain data provided by Barclays. Barclays Index data provided by way of Barclays Live. This document may contain data provided by Standard and Poor's. Nothing contained within any document, advertisement or presentation from S &P Indices constitutes an offer of services in jurisdictions where S &P Indices does not have the necessary licenses. All information provided by S &P Indices is impersonal and is not tailored to the needs of any person, entity or group of persons. Any returns or performance provided within any document is provided for illustrative purposes only and does not demonstrate actual performance. Past performance is not a guarantee of future investment results. This document may contain data provided by MSCI, Inc. Copyright MSCI, 2012. Unpublished. All Rights Reserved. This information may only be used for your internal use, may not be reproduced or redisseminated in any form and may not be used to create any financial instruments or products or any indices. This information is provided on an "as is" basis and the user of this information assumes the entire risk of any use it may make or permit to be made of this information. Neither MSCI, any of its affiliates or any other person involved in or related to compiling, computing or creating this information makes any express or implied warranties or representations with respect to such information or the results to be obtained by the use thereof, and MSCI, its affiliates and each such other person hereby expressly disclaim all warranties (including, without limitation, all warranties of originality, accuracy, completeness, timeliness, non - infringement, merchantability and fitness fora particular purpose) with respect to this information. Without limiting any of the foregoing, in no event shall MSCI, any of its affiliates or any other person involved in or related to compiling, computing or creating this information have any liability for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, punitive, consequential or any other damages (including, without limitation, lost profits) even if notified of, or if it might otherwise have anticipated, the possibility of such damages. This document may contain data provided by Russell Investment Group. Russell Investment Group is the source owner of the data contained or reflected in this material and all trademarks and copyrights related thereto. The material may contain confidential information and unauthorized use, disclosure, copying, dissemination or redistribution is strictly prohibited. This is a user presentation of the data. Russell Investment Group is not responsible for the formatting or configuration of this material or for any inaccuracy in presentation thereof. This document may contain data provided by Morningstar. All rights reserved. Use of this content requires expert knowledge. It is to be used by specialist institutions only. The information contained herein: (1) is proprietary to Morningstar and /or its content providers; (2) may not be copied, adapted or distributed; and (3) is not warranted to be accurate, complete or timely. Neither Morningstar nor its content providers are responsible for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information, except where such damages or losses cannot be limited or excluded by law in your jurisdiction. Past financial performance is not guarantee of future results. FW Putting clients first. And Co Cnnsultimg 1 ($66) 24()-79:32 I. lr�rlf�r�[:c�tixirl�it�,.crrt�r Fmit rlY The Bogdahn gaup