HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017 03 13 Consent 304 Seminole County Interlocal Agreement-Cross Seminole Trail Missing Link Phase II Environmental Site Assessment CostsCOMMISSION AGENDA
ITEM 304
REQUEST:
Informational
Consent
X
Public Hearings
Regular
March 13, 2017 KS SM
Regular Meeting City Manager Department
Public Works Department Requesting the City Commission Approve the Interlocal
Agreement with Seminole County for the Cross Seminole Trail missing link Phase II
Environmental Site Assessment Evaluation Costs.
SYNOPSIS:
The City has engaged a consultant to perform a Phase 11 Environmental Site Assessment
(ESA) of the Cross Seminole Trail missing link right of way that is tentatively planned on
being donated by Mr. Phillips. The State requires ESA's before accepting title to donated
property. This interlocal provides for the County to pay up to $11,100 in additional costs
associated with the delineation of some minor contamination found during the initial Phase
11 ESA.
CONSIDERATIONS:
City staff became more actively involved in the Cross Seminole Trail right of way
acquisition in the fall of 2015 when Mr. Phillips offered to donate his property to the City
which we then could swap with the State for the property in the Town Center needed to
build Magnolia Park. This action could potentially save the City approximately $105,000.
To move the approval process along at the State, the City has since completed revised
surveys of the Phillips property ($3,830), a Level I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA)
as required by the State ($2,000), and an initial phase of the Level 2 ESA ($13,460) based
on the recommendations of the Level I ESA.
A proposal was solicited to conduct a follow up Level 2 ESA to determine the extents of
Consent 304 PAGE 1 OF 2 - March 13, 2017
the contamination detected in the initial Level II ESA and the cost was estimated at
$11,600. Staff subsequently requested financial assistance from the County since this will
be a County trail and our primary interest was more focused on the acquisition of the
Magnolia Park amphitheater. The County has provided the attached interlocal agreement
for cost sharing up to $11,100 which reflects the final costs of the Level II ESA follow up.
The completed evaluation, which confirmed the extents of the minor contamination at four
locations, has been forwarded to the State for guidance on cleanup requirements if any. An
exhibit depicting the four locations along SR 419 is also attached.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The City will invoice the County for the $11,100 spent to perform the follow up Level II
Environmental Site Assessment. Any additional costs relating to the cleanup are unknown
and have not been addressed at this time.
COMMUNICATION EFFORTS:
This Agenda Item has been electronically forwarded to the Mayor and City Commission,
City Manager, City Attorney /Staff, and is available on the City's Website, LaserFiche, and
the City's Server. Additionally, portions of this Agenda Item are typed verbatim on the
respective Meeting Agenda which has also been electronically forwarded to the individuals
noted above, and which is also available on the City's Website, LaserFiche, and the City's
Server; has been sent to applicable City Staff, Media/Press Representatives who have
requested Agendas /Agenda Item information, Homeowner's Associations/Representatives
on file with the City, and all individuals who have requested such information. This
information has also been posted outside City Hall, posted inside City Hall with additional
copies available for the General Public, and posted at six (6) different locations around the
City. Furthermore, this information is also available to any individual requestors. City Staff
is always willing to discuss this Agenda Item or any Agenda Item with any interested
individuals.
RECOMMENDATION:
Public Works Department Recommends the City Commission Approve the Interlocal
Agreement with Seminole County for the Cross Seminole Trail missing link Phase II
Environmental Site Assessment Evaluation Cost Reimbursement and authorize the City
Manager and City Attorney to execute any and all applicable documents.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Interlocal Agreement (12 pages)
2. Excerpt from Phase II ESA (10 pages)
Consent 304 PAGE 2 OF 2 - March 13, 2017
Attachment No. 1
INTERLOCAL COST SHARE AGREEMENT BETWEEN
SEMINOLE COUNTY AND THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between
SEMINOLE COUNTY, a charter county and political subdivision of the State of Florida, whose
address is Seminole County Services Building, 1101 East 1st Street, Sanford, Florida 32771 -1468,
in this Agreement referred to as "COUNTY," and the CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, a Florida
municipal corporation, whose address is 1126 East State Road 434, Winter Springs, Florida 32708,
in this Agreement referred to as "CITY."
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, both COUNTY and CITY are concerned and interested in completing the
unfinished segment of the Cross Seminole Trail located within and in the vicinity of the
geographical boundaries of CITY; and
WHEREAS, a portion of this unfinished segment of the Cross Seminole Trail has been
determined to have environmental contamination (the "Contaminated Segment "); and
WHEREAS, CITY has previously engaged the firm of The Environmental People, Inc.
( "TEP ") to prepare Phase I and Phase 11 environmental assessments of the Contaminated Segment
at a cost of $13,460.00 and CITY has incurred related expenses of $3,830.00 to Land Tech
Surveying and Mapping Corporation and $2,000.00 to Professional Services Industries, Inc., for a
total of $19,200.00, all at CITY's sole expense; and
WHEREAS, as a result of TEP's Phase II environmental assessment, it has been
determined that further remediation work is needed; and
WHEREAS, CITY has obtained a scope of work and estimated budget breakdown for this
additional remediation work from TEP in the amount of ELEVEN THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED
AND NO /100 DOLLARS ($11,100.00); and
Interlocal Cost Agreement Between
Seminole County and the City of Winter Springs
Page 1 of 8
WHEREAS, CITY has reviewed the scope of work and estimated budget prepared by TEP
and has requested COUNTY agree to pay one hundred percent (100 %) of the total fees for this
additional work; and
WHEREAS, COUNTY is willing to reimburse CITY one hundred percent (100 %) of the
total cost of the additional remediation work for services rendered by TEP in view of the previous
expense incurred by CITY in this matter; and
WHEREAS, entering this Interlocal Agreement is in the best interest of the citizens of
CITY and COUNTY as it will benefit the health, safety, and welfare of these citizens.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual understandings and agreements set
forth in this Agreement, CITY and COUNTY agree as follows:
Section 1. Recitals. The recitals, above, are true and form a material part of this
Interlocal Agreement.
Section 2. Purpose. The purpose of this Interlocal Agreement is to establish the terms
and conditions for reimbursement of CITY by COUNTY for the cost of the Work.
Section 3. Work. The term "Work" is defined in this Agreement as ESA Phase 2
Supplemental for Benzo [a] Pyrene (BaP) Evaluation. The parties agree that the total cost of the
Work will not exceed ELEVEN THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED AND NO /100 DOLLARS
($11,100.00).
Section 4. Term. This Interlocal Agreement will commence and become effective
upon execution by the parties, the later date of execution controlling. This Interlocal Agreement
will remain in force from the date of execution until CITY has been reimbursed in full by
COUNTY for payment to TEP for the total cost of the Work, with COUNTY having paid CITY
its one hundred percent (100 %) share of the total cost consistent with Section 6 below.
Interlocal Cost Agreement Between
Seminole County and the City of Winter Springs
Page 2 of 8
Section 5. Obligations of CITY. CITY shall enter a contract with TEP to perform the
Work and pay TEP pursuant to this contract and as provided in Section 6 below.
Section 6. Obligations of COUNTY. COUNTY shall reimburse CITY for one
hundred percent (100 %) of the total cost of the Work up to a total not to exceed the amount
specified in Section 3 above. Within thirty (30) days of the end of each calendar quarter, CITY
shall submit an invoice to COUNTY at the following address describing and evidencing services
rendered by TEP for the Work during such quarter, and the actual cost associated with those
services:
David W. Martin, P .E., Professional Engineer
Public Works Department/Engineering
Seminole County Government
100 East 1 st Street
Sanford, FL 32773
Within thirty (30) days after receipt of an invoice, COUNTY shall pay CITY for the amount of the
invoice for CITY to pay TEP, provided both parties have reviewed and approved the invoice and
the total amount COUNTY pays CITY does not exceed the amount specified in Section 3 above.
COUNTY shall acknowledge CITY by email of invoice acceptance and approval for payment.
COUNTY's payment must be sent to:
Kipton Lockcuff, P.E.
Utility/Public Works Director
1126 East State Road 434
Winter Springs, FL 32708
Section 7. Termination. This Interlocal Agreement may be terminated, in whole or
in part, by either party at any time, with or without cause, upon not less than sixty (60) days written
notice delivered to the other party. However, any obligations under this Interlocal Agreement
incurred prior to the termination date will survive the termination and be performed or paid, as the
case may be.
Interlocal Cost Agreement Between
Seminole County and the City of Winter Springs
Page 3 of 8
Section 8. Indemnification. Neither party to this Interlocal Agreement, nor its
officers, employees, and agents may be deemed to assume any liability for the acts, omissions and
negligence of the other party, its officers, employees, and agents.
Section 9. Assignments. Neither party to this Interlocal Agreement may assign this
Interlocal Agreement, nor any interest arising under it, without the written consent of the other
party.
Section 10. Notices. Whenever either party desires to give written notice to the other
party, notice may be sent to:
FOR CITY:
Utility/Public Works Director
1126 East State Road 434
Winter Springs, FL 32708
FOR COUNTY: 6 iz
Public Work Department
200 West County Home Road
Sanford Florida 32773
Either of the parties may change, by written notice as provided in this Agreement, the addresses
or persons for receipt of notices.
Section 11. Compliance with Laws and Regulations. In providing all services
pursuant to this Interlocal Agreement, the parties shall abide by all statutes, ordinances, rules, and
regulations pertaining to, or regulating the provisions of, such services, including those now in
effect and subsequently adopted.
Section 12. Employee Status. Persons employed by CITY in the performance of
services and functions pursuant to this Agreement are deemed not to be the employees or agents
of COUNTY, nor do these employees have any claims to pensions, worker's compensation,
Interlocal Cost Agreement Between
Seminole County and the City of Winter Springs
Page 4 of 8
unemployment compensation, civil service, or other employee rights or privileges granted to
COUNTY's officers and employees either by operation of law or by COUNTY. Persons employed
by COUNTY in the performance of services and functions pursuant to this Agreement are deemed
not to be the employees or agents of CITY, nor do these employees have any claims to pensions,
worker's compensation, unemployment compensation, civil service, or other employee rights or
privileges granted to CITY's officers and employees either by operation of law or by CITY.
Section 13. Governing Law. The laws of the State of Florida govern the validity,
enforcement, and interpretation of this Agreement. Seminole County is the sole venue for any
legal action in connection with this Agreement.
Section 14. Parties Bound. This Agreement is binding upon and inures to the benefit
of CITY and COUNTY, and their successors and assigns.
Section 15. Conflict of Interest.
(a) Each party agrees that it shall not engage in any action that would create a conflict
of interest in the performance of its obligations pursuant to this Agreement with the other party or
which would violate or cause third parties to violate the provisions of Part III, Chapter 112, Florida
Statutes (2016), as this statute may be amended from time to time, relating to ethics in government.
(b) Each party hereby certifies that no officer, agent, or employee of that party has any
material interest (as defined in Section 112.3 12(15), Florida Statutes (2016), as the statute may be
amended from time to time, as over 5 %) either directly or indirectly, in the business of the other
party to be conducted here, and that no such person will have any such interest at any time during
the term of this Agreement.
(c) Each party has the continuing duty to report to the other party any information that
indicates a possible violation of this Section.
Interlocal Cost Agreement Between
Seminole County and the City of Winter Springs
Page 5 of 8
Section 16. Dispute Resolution. Either party to this Agreement may notify the other
party that it wishes to commence formal dispute resolution with respect to any unresolved problem
under this Agreement. The parties agree to submit the dispute to a Florida Certified Circuit Court
Civil Mediator for mediation, within sixty (60) days following the date of this notice. In the event
that any dispute cannot be resolved by mediation, it may be filed as a civil action in the Circuit
Court of the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit of Florida, in and for Seminole County, Florida. The
parties further agree that any such action will be tried to the Court, and the parties hereby waive
the ri ght to jury trial as to such action.
Section 17. Entire Agreement.
(a) It is understood and agreed that the entire agreement of the parties is contained in
this Agreement, which supersedes all oral agreements, negotiations, and previous agreements
between the parties relating to the subject matter of this Agreement.
(b) Any alterations, amendments, deletions, or waivers of the provisions of this
Agreement will be valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed by both parties, except
as otherwise specifically provided in this Agreement.
Section 18. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement or the application of this
Agreement to any person or circumstance is held invalid, it is the intent of the parties that the
invalidity will not affect other provisions or applications of this Agreement that can be given effect
without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Agreement are
declared severable.
Section 19. Public Records Law.
(a) CITY and COUNTY acknowledge each other's obligations under Article 1, Section
24, Florida Constitution and Chapter 119, Florida Statutes (2016), as this statute may be amended
Interlocal Cost Agreement Between
Seminole County and the City of Winter Springs
Page 6 of 8
from time to time, to release public records to members of the public upon request. CITY and
COUNTY acknowledge each other is required to comply with Article 1, Section 24, Florida
Constitution and Chapter 119, Florida Statutes (2016), as this statute may be amended from time
to time, in the handling of the materials created under this Agreement and that this statute controls
over the terms of this Agreement.
(b) Failure to comply with this Section will be deemed a material breach of this
Agreement, for which the non - breaching party may terminate this Agreement immediately upon
written notice to the breaching party.
Section 20. Equal Opportunity Employment. CITY and COUNTY agree that they
shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment for work under this
Agreement because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin. CITY and
COUNTY shall take steps to ensure that applicants are employed, and employees are treated during
employment, without regard to race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin. This
provision must include, but is not limited to, the following: employment; upgrading, demotion or
transfer; recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of
compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship.
Section 21. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of
counterparts each of which, when executed and delivered, constitutes an original, but all
counterparts together constitute one and the same instrument.
Section 22. Headings and Captions. All headings and captions contained in this
Agreement are provided for convenience only, do not constitute a part of this Agreement, and may
not be used to define, describe, interpret, or construe any provision of this Agreement.
Interlocal Cost Agreement Between
Seminole County and the City of Winter Springs
Page 7 of 8
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have made and executed this Agreement for the
purposes stated above.
ATTEST:
Andrea Lorenzo - Luaces, City Clerk
ATTEST:
Grant Maloy
Clerk to the Board of
County Commissioners of
Seminole County, Florida.
L'In
Date:
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
Charles Lacey, Mayor
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
John Horan, Chairman
Date:
For the use and reliance of 41��ounty s authorized for execution by the Board of
Seminole County only. Commissioners at its
2017, regular meeting.
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency.
County Attorney
DGS /dre
02/21/17
P:AUsers \dedgeAMy Documents\AGT\2017 \SC & WS CST Interlocal Cost Share Agreement.docx
Interlocal Cost Agreement Between
Seminole County and the City of Winter Springs
Page 8 of 8
Attachment No. 2
Technical Memorandum Concerning
Distribution of BaP at the Phillips Property
The purpose of this Technical Memorandum (TM) is to communicate the results of field
sampling efforts requested by the City of Winter Springs as it concerns the presence of
Benzo(a)Pyrene (BaP) at the above referenced Site. The field sampling efforts concentrated
on areas within the boundaries of a proposed future trailway where the reported
concentrations of BaP total equivalents (TE) exceeded Florida Department of Environmental
Protection FDEP residential direct exposure (RDE) and /or industrial direct exposure (IDE)
levels as reported in TEP's October 2016 Phase II Environmental Site Assessment. This TM
also discusses the analytical results of testing for BaP compounds as part of sampling efforts
completed subsequent to July 2016 Phase II ESA that were performed in August and
December 2016. These locations include the following: WS- SS -08, WS- SS -09, WS -SS -13
and WS- SS -17. These four (4) locations are depicted on Figure 1 that is provided as an
attachment to this TM. Also depicted on Figure 1 is the approximate limits of the proposed
trail way.
Scope of Field Investigation
The following sets forth supplemental soil sampling activities necessary for evaluating the
distribution of BaP in the soil matrix at the Site. Soil samples collected as part of the field
efforts were submitted to Environmental Conservation Laboratories, Inc. (ENCO), a State
certified laboratory where they were analyzed using United States Environmental Protection
Agency 8270D low level analysis for semi - volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) test method.
The field sampling efforts were performed under the responsible charge of a registered
geologist. Prior to commencement of field work, TEP prepared a health and safety plan and
provided notification for the location of underground utilities by notifying 811.
Soil Sampling Activities
The following summarizes the soil sampling efforts completed as part of the original Phase II
ESA dated July 2016 along with additional sampling performed in August and December 2016.
A discussion of these efforts is provided as follows.
• Over the course of three (3), the July 2016 Phase II ESA sampling event and
Supplemental Phase II sampling efforts that were performed in August 2016 as well
as in December 2016, TEP collected up to 40 soil samples. This TM concentrates on
the results of soil sampling and analyzed for SVOCs by EPA Method 8270D low level
analysis. The 40 soil samples were obtained from the land surface to depths up to 4
feet bgs;
• Supplemental soil sampling efforts concentrated on areas where BaP TE values were
identified above FDEP SCTLs as part of the original Phase II ESA sampling actions that
were performed in July 2016. The for areas of concern included WS- SS -08, WS -SS-
09, WS- SS -13, and WS- SS -17;
• The soil samples were obtained manually using a stainless steel hand auger. The first
sampling interval being from the land surface to two (2) feet bgs, and a second soil
sample collected from approximate depths of three (3) to four (4) feet. To reduce the
potential of cross contaminating deeper soil samples while advancing the borehole with
the auger, a four (4) inch diameter PVC casing was placed in the borehole following
retrieval of the samples from the zero (0) to two (2) foot depth. Once this protective
PVC casing was positioned in the open borehole and sealed to the bottom of the two
(2) foot depth range, TEP then proceeded with hand augering through the PVC casing
to retrieve the three (3) to four (4) foot sample aliquot;
• At the location of WS- SS -08, nine (9) soil samples were collected from points east of
WS -SS -08 (WS- SS -08E), west of WS -SS -08 (WS- SS -08W), north of WS -SS -08 (WS-
the
environmentaineople
Technical Memorandum Concerning
Distribution of BaP at the Phillips Property
(Continued)
SS -08N) and south of WS -SS -08 (WS- SS -08S) as well as from the location of WS -SS-
08. The samples were obtained from the land surface to approximately one (1) foot,
one (1) to three (3) foot and three (3) to four (4) feet bgs;
At the location of WS- SS -09, nine (9) soil samples were collected for chemical analysis
for PAH compounds. from points east, west, north and south of WS -SS -09 from the
land surface to one (1) foot and from three (3) to four (4) feet bgs. A vertical sample
from three (3) feet bgs was also collected below the Phase II sampling location of WS-
SS-09;
At the location of WS- SS -13, ten (10) soil samples were collected. The sampling
locations included the original location WS- SS -13. Two (2) soil samples were obtained
north of WS -SS -13 which included WS- SS -13N and WS- SS- 13N.2. Two (2) soil
samples were obtained from points south of WS -SS -13 being WS- SS -13S and WS -SS-
13S.2. One (1) soil sample (WS- SS -13W) was obtained from a point west of WS -SS-
13. One (1) sample (WS- SS -13E) was obtained from a location east of soil location
WS- SS -13. Sampling depths at this area were similar to the other locations with
samples being collected from the land surface to one (1) foot and a second sample
aliquot being taken from three (3) to four (4) feet bgs. At the location of WS- SS -13,
three (3) samples were obtained with the first interval being from land surface to one
(1) foot bgs, a second interval of two (2) to three (3) feet bgs and a third sample taken
from the depth of three (3) to four (4) feet bgs;
At the location of WS- SS -17, ten (10) soil samples were collected from points east,
south, west and north of WS- SS -17. Samples obtained west of WS -SS -17 included
WS- SS -17W and WS- SS- 17W.2. Samples obtained east of WS -SS -17 included
sampling points WS- SS -17E and WS- SS- 17E.2. One sample was obtained south of
WS- SS -17. This sample was designated as WS- SS -17S. Two (2) sample locations were
completed to the north of WS- SS -17. These sampling locations were identified as being
WS- SS -17N and WS- SS- 17N.2. Consistent with the other three (3) investigative areas,
the soil samples were obtained the land surface to one (1) foot and from three (3) to
four (4) feet bgs;
It should be noted that at the deeper of the two (2) sampling intervals ( two [2] to
four [4] foot bgs), the soil samples were only analyzed if the laboratory data for the
shallower sampling interval indicated that the BaP TE exceeded the Florida DEP RDE
SCTL;
All soil samples were packaged, placed in a cooler, and covered with ice, and
subsequently transported to ENCO laboratories where they were each analyzed by
USEPA Method 8270D, low level analysis. A sampling matrix table is also provided that
summarizes the Phase II and Supplemental Phase II sampling program. This table is
provided as Exhibit 1 to the TM.
Results of the Soil Samolina Efforts
• Consistent with the July 2016 Phase II ESA, the supplemental efforts also confirmed
the presence of BaP with BaP total equivalent (TE) concentrations in the soil vadose
zone above the FDEP RDE and /or IDE levels at each of the four (4) locations evaluated.
The presence of BaP compounds in the soil appears to be limited to areas where fill
was placed, as well as suspected areas where street sweeping materials were used to
fill in low areas to the west of Wade Street. The vertical distribution of BaP at some
locations extended to depths of four (4) feet bgs. Please see Figure 1 which identifies
the four (4) Site sampling locations where BaP TE values exceeded the FDEP SCTLs.
2 1 P a g e
the
environmentalpeople
Technical Memorandum Concerning
Distribution of BaP at the Phillips Property
(Continued)
We have also prepared four (4) individual figures which show the locations where the
borings discussed previously were completed. This figures also provide the reported
BaP TE values for each of the sampling locations and depths. Figure 2 shows the
distribution of BaP compounds at the WS -SS -08 sampling location. Figure 3 depicts
the results of BaP testing for soil boring location WS- SS -09, while Figure 4 shows the
sampling results for soil boring location WS- SS -13. Figure 5 summarizes the
distribution of BaP compounds at soil boring location WS- SS -17;
• The results of analytical tests for PAH compounds are also summarized on the attached
set of BaP Equivalency Conversion tables. Copies of the BaP Conversion Tables are
also attached to this TM along with the ENCO laboratory report for each corresponding
location. Review of this information reveals that concentrations of BaP TE exceeded
FDEP RIDE (0.1 mg /kg) and IDE SCTL (0.7 mg /kg) at multiple boring locations at each
of the four (4) areas evaluated. A discussion of the distribution of BaP in the soil for
each of the four (4) areas evaluated are as follows:
o For the location of WS- SS -08, BaP TE values were exceeded at four (4)
sampling locations. Locations where BaP TE criteria for the RIDE SCTL were
exceeded include: WS- SS -08, WS- SS -08E, WS- SS -08W and WS- SS -08N. At
these locations the BaP impacts were limited to the upper soil horizon to a
depth of three (3) feet or less. At the location of WS- SS -08E, the BaP impacts
extended a little deeper into the soil matrix unit to a depth of four (4) feet bgs.
This was also the only location where the BaP TE exceeded the IDE SCTL of 0.7
mg /kg. Copies of the BaP Conversion Table for WS -SS -08 have been attached
to this TM. Each sampling location and corresponding BaP TE concentration is
also provided as Figure 2;
o For the location of WS- SS -09, TEP collected a total of nine (9) samples as part
of the Phase II and Supplemental Phase II efforts. Review of BaP Conversion
tables for this location revealed the concentration of BaP TE above FDEP SCTLs
for five (5) of nine (9) locations evaluated. At the location of WS- SS -09N, the
concentration also exceeded the IDE SCTL of 0.7 mg /kg where a BaP TE of 0.9
mg /kg was reported. For a depiction of the distribution of BaP compounds for
this location please refer to Figure 3;
o For study area WS- SS -13, a total of ten (10) soil samples were collected for
purposes of evaluating the distribution of BaP in the soil matrix. At four (4) of
the ten (10) soil sampling locations, the BaP TE value exceeded the RIDE SCTL
of 0.1 mg /kg. At two (2) of the four (4) investigative locations, WS -SS -13 and
WS- SS- 13N.2, the BaP TE concentration also exceeded the IDE SCTL of 0.7
mg /kg. At WS -SS -13 a BaP TE value of 2.0 mg /kg was reported and for the
location of WS- SS -13N.2 a BaP TE value of 1.3 mg /kg was reported. BaP
impacts at WS -SS -13 were generally limited to the upper three (3) feet of the
soil horizon.
3 1 P a g e
the
environmentalpeople
Technical Memorandum Concerning
Distribution of BaP at the Phillips Property
(Continued)
o The fourth Site location where BaP TE values exceeded the FDEP was at soil
boring location WS- SS -17. As shown on Figure 5, this location is just north of
a small unpaved parking area for the employees of 419 Recycling, Inc. and
northeast of the intersection of Wade Street and S.R. 419. At this locale, the
FDEP SCTL for RDE and /or IDE exceeded the BaP TE threshold at six (6) of the
eight (8) soil boring locations. For five (5) of the six (6) locations the BaP TE
value exceeded the RDE SCTL. At one (1) of the five (5) sampling locations,
WS- SS- 17E.2, the reported BaP TE value of 0.8 mg /kg exceeded the IDE SCTL
of 0.7 mg /kg. This soil sample was collected from one -half (0.5) to one (1) foot
bgs interval. At the three (3) to four (4) foot sample obtained from this same
location, the BaP TE did not exceed the RDE and /or IDE FDEP SCTLs. BaP TE
values for the southernmost sample collected from the area of WS- SS -17, soil
sample WS- SS -17S, did not exceed FDEP SCTLs for BaP TE.
4 1 P a g e
the
environmentalpeople
F F
1
W S -SS48
WS -5549
7
{i%
J
r
,
1
m �`-
r
da
1F C N
WS -99 -9N
Q 1 i
BaP TE [0.9] for 0.5 to 1'
BaP TE [0.0]for3 to 4'
Q ni
6
W9-99 -9W
Y
N
BaP TE [0.4] for 0.5 to 1'
0
'
BaP TE [0.5] for 3 to 4'
W9 -ss -9E
BaP TE [0.6] for
BaP TE [0.7] for
W9 -ss -9
BaP TE [0.2] for 0.5 to 1'
_
BaP TE [0.0] for 3 to 4'
_
Explanation
EPE ;
BaP TE Does Not Exceed the FDEP RDE Level of 0.1 mg /kg
BaP TE Exceeds the FDEP RDE of 0.1 mg /kg
W9 -ss -9s
■5
BaP TE Exceeds the FDEP IDE Level of 0.7 mg /kg
BaP TE [0. to 0] for 0. 1'
N
o
Interval Not Sampled
DRAFT
N
GRAPHIC SCALE
=
0' 10' 20
scn1E: 1 = 10'
3
Benzo(a)pyrene Conversion Table
Benzo(a)pyrene Conversion Table
For Direct Exposure Soil Cleanup Target Levels
Instructions can be found below the table
!Facility/Site Name: Phillips Phase II ESA
Site Location: S.R. 419 WinterSprings, FL
Facili /Site ID No.:
TEF = Toxic Equivalency Factor
SCTL Type
Value
Units
Residential Direct Exposure SCTL
0.1
mg/kg
Industrial Direct Exposure SCTL
0.7
mg/kg
Alternative SCTL (Optional)
SS- 08S(0 -1')
mg/kg
Site Specific Background (Optional)
Sample Date
mg/kg
WSSSMB6 PTabI.91z9z9T1�(a)p Teos page 1 of 1
Soil Sam le#
SS-08(0-1 -)
SS- 08(3 -4')
SS- 08E(0 -1')
SS- 08E(3 -4')
SS- 08W(0 -1')
SS- 08W(3 -4')
SS- 08N(0 -1')
SS- 08N(3-4')
SS- 08S(0 -1')
Sample Date
7/28/2016
12/19/2016
12/19/2016
12/19/2016
12/19/2016
12/19/2016
12/19/2016
12/19/2016
12/19/2016
Sample
Location:
Depth (ft):
0.5 to 1 foot
3 to 4 foot
0.5 to 1 foot
3 to 4 foot
0.5 to 1 foot
3 to 4 foot
0.5 to 1 foot
3 to 4 foot
0.5 to 1 foot
Contaminant Concentrations
Contaminant
TEF
SS- 08(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
SS- 08(3 -4')
(mg /kg)
SS- 08E(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
SS- 08E(3 -4')
(mg /kg)
SS- 08W(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
SS- 08W(3 -4')
(mg /kg)
SS- 08N(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
SS- 08N(3-4')
(mg /kg)
SS- 08S(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
Benzo(a)pyrene
1.0
0.17
0.21
0.60
0.33
0.0105
0.25
0.037
Benzo a anthracene
0.1
0.019
0.009
0.21
0.092
0.01
0.009
0.009
Benzo b fluoranthene
0.1
0.29
0.42
1.2
0.64
0.025
0.41
0.079
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
0.01
0.089
0.15
0.36
0.22
0.0135
0.19
0.037
Chrysene
0.001
0.17
0.22
0.78
0.36
0.0085
0.27
0.008
Dibenz a,h anthracene
1.0
0.05
0.043
0.14
0.063
0.011
0.070
0.0105
Indeno(1,2,3- cd)pyrene
0.1
0.16
0.23
1 0.52
1 0.25
1 0.0105
1 0.22
1
1 0.01
Benzo(a)pyrene
Equivalents
Contaminant
TEF
- -
(mg /kg)
66-U6(,3-4)
(mg /kg)
- -
(mg /kg)
- -
(mg /kg)
- -
(mg /kg)
- -
(mg /kg)
-
(mg /kg)
-
(mg /kg)
- -
(mg /kg)
Benzo(a)pyrene
1.0
0.1700
0.0000
0.2100
0.6000
0.3300
0.0105
0.2500
0.0000
0.0370
0.0000
Benzo a anthracene
0.1
0.0019
0.0000
0.0009
0.0210
0.0092
0.0010
0.0009
0.0000
0.0009
0.0000
Benzo b fluoranthene
0.1
0.0290
0.0000
0.0420
0.1200
0.0640
0.0025
0.0410
0.0000
0.0079
0.0000
Benzo k fluoranthene
0.01
0.0009
0.0000
0.0015
0.0036
0.0022
0.0001
0.0019
0.0000
0.0004
0.0000
Chrysene
0.001
0.0002
0.0000
0.0002
0.0008
0.0004
0.0000
0.0003
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Dibenz a,h anthracene
1.0
0.0500
0.0000
0.0430
0.1400
0.0630
0.0110
0.0700
0.0000
0.0105
0.0000
Indeno 1,2,3 -cd rene
0.1
0.0160
0.0000
0.0230
0.0520
0.0250
0.0011
0.0220
0.0000
0.0010
0.0000
Total Equivalents
Total Benzo(a)pyrene Equivalents 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.9
1 0.5 0.0 0.4 0.0 1 0.1 0.0
Comparisons to SCTLs
Does This Sample Exceed:
SS- 08(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
SS- 08(3-4')
(mg /kg)
SS- 08E(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
SS- 08E(3 -4')
(mg /kg)
SS- 08W(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
SS- 08W(3 -4')
(mg /kg)
SS- 08N(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
SS- 08N(3 -4')
(mg /kg)
SS- 08S(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
The Residential Direct Exposure SCTL of
0.1 mg /kg?
EXCEEDS
OK
EXCEEDS
EXCEEDS
EXCEEDS
OK
EXCEEDS
OK
OK
OK
The Industrial Direct Exposure SCTL of
0.7 mg /kg?
OK
OK
OK
EXCEEDS
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
No Alternative SCTL Given
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
No Site Specific Background Given
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
WSSSMB6 PTabI.91z9z9T1�(a)p Teos page 1 of 1
Benzo(a)pyrene Conversion Table
Benzo(a)pyrene Conversion Table
For Direct Exposure Soil Cleanup Target Levels
Instructions can be found below the table
!Facility/Site Name: Phillips Phase II ESA
Site Location: S.R. 419 WinterSprings, FL
Facili /Site ID No.:
TEF = Toxic Equivalency Factor
SCTL Type
Value
Units
Residential Direct Exposure SCTL
0.1
mg/kg
Industrial Direct Exposure SCTL
0.7
mg/kg
Alternative SCTL (Optional)
SS- 09S(0 -1')
mg/kg
Site Specific Background (Optional)
Sam le Date
mg/kg
WSSS99Ba PTabI. 91292911�(a)p Teos page 1 of 1
Soil Sam le#
SS- 09(0 -1')
SS- 09b(3-4')
SS- 09E(0 -1')
SS- 09E(3 -4')
SS- 09W(0 -1')
SS- 09W(3 -4')
SS- 09N(0 -1')
SS- 09N(3-4')
SS- 09S(0 -1')
Sam le Date
7/29/2016
12/19/2016
12/19/2016
12/19/2016
12/19/2016
12/19/2016
12/19/2016
12/19/2016
12/19/2016
Sample
Location:
Depth (ft):
0.5 to 1 foot
3 to 4 foot
0.5 to 1 foot
1 3 to 4 foot 0.5 to 1 foot 3 to 4 foot
0.5 to 1 foot
3 to 4 foot
0.5 to 1 foot
Contaminant Concentrations
Contaminant
TEF
SS- 09(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
SS- 09b(3-4')
(mg /kg)
SS- 09E(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
SS- 09E(3 -4')
(mg /kg)
SS- 09W(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
SS- 09W(3 -4')
(mg /kg)
SS- 09N(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
SS- 09N(3-4')
(mg /kg)
SS- 09S(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
Benzo(a)pyrene
1.0
0.11
0.0095
0.40
0.45
0.24
0.32
0.54
0.0095
0.026
Benzo a anthracene
0.1
0.007
0.009
0.13
0.031
0.034
0.0115
0.27
0.009
0.0095
Benzo b fluoranthene
0.1
0.19
0.026
0.72
0.81
0.48
0.59
1.1
0.026
0.061
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
0.01
0.058
0.012
0.22
0.26
0.16
0.18
0.36
0.0125
0.013
Chrysene
0.001
0.11
0.0075
0.45
0.45
0.26
0.33
0.57
0.0075
0.008
Dibenz a,h anthracene
1.0
0.031
0.0105
0.10
0.12
0.057
0.085
0.12
0.0105
0.011
Indeno(1,2,3- cd)pyrene
0.1
0.11
0.0095
0.36
0.42
0.26
0.30
0.52
0.0095
0.01
Benzo(a)pyrene
Equivalents
Contaminant
TEF
- -
(mg /kg)
-
(mg /kg)
- -
(mg /kg)
- -
(mg /kg)
66- -
(mg /kg)
- -
(mg /kg)
-
(mg /kg)
-
(mg /kg)
- -
(mg /kg)
Benzo(a)pyrene
1.0
0.1100
0.0095
0.4000
0.4500
0.2400
0.3200
0.5400
0.0095
0.0260
0.0000
Benzo a anthracene
0.1
0.0007
0.0009
0.0130
0.0031
0.0034
0.0012
0.0270
0.0009
0.0010
0.0000
Benzo b fluoranthene
0.1
0.0190
0.0026
0.0720
0.0810
0.0480
0.0590
0.1100
0.0026
0.0061
0.0000
Benzo k fluoranthene
0.01
0.0006
0.0001
0.0022
0.0026
0.0016
0.0018
0.0036
0.0001
0.0001
0.0000
Chrysene
0.001
0.0001
0.0000
0.0005
0.0005
0.0003
0.0003
0.0006
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Dibenz a,h anthracene
1.0
0.0310
0.0105
0.1000
0.1200
0.0570
0.0850
0.1200
0.0105
0.0110
0.0000
Indeno 1,2,3 -cd rene
0.1
0.0110
0.0010
0.0360
0.0420
0.0260
0.0300
0.0520
0.0010
0.0010
0.0000
Total Equivalents
Total Benzo(a)pyrene Equivalents 0.2 0.0 0.6 0.7
1 0.4 0.5 0.9 0.0 1 0.0 0.0
Comparisons to SCTLs
Does This Sample Exceed:
SS- 09(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
SS- 096(3-4')
(mg /kg)
SS- 09E(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
SS- 09E(3 -4')
(mg /kg)
SS- 09W(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
SS- 09W(3 -4')
(mg /kg)
SS- 09N(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
SS- 09N(3 -4')
(mg /kg)
SS- 09S(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
The Residential Direct Exposure SCTL of
0.1 mg /kg?
EXCEEDS
OK
EXCEEDS
EXCEEDS
EXCEEDS
EXCEEDS
EXCEEDS
OK
OK
OK
The Industrial Direct Exposure SCTL of
0.7 mg /kg?
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
EXCEEDS
OK
OK
OK
No Alternative SCTL Given
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
No Site Specific Background Given
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
WSSS99Ba PTabI. 91292911�(a)p Teos page 1 of 1
Benzo(a)pyrene Conversion Table
Benzo(a)pyrene Conversion Table
For Direct Exposure Soil Cleanup Target Levels
Instructions can be found below the table
!Facility/Site Name: Phillips Phase II ESA
Site Location: S.R. 419 WinterSprings, FL
Facili /Site ID No.:
TEF = Toxic Equivalency Factor
SCTL Type
Value
Units
Residential Direct Exposure SCTL
0.1
mg/kg
Industrial Direct Exposure SCTL
0.7
mg/kg
Alternative SCTL (Optional)
SS- 13E(0 -1')
mg/kg
Site Specific Background (Optional)
Sample Date
mg/kg
BaPCOnv- - Tables WSSS13 9129291 s�(a)p Teos page 1 of 1
Soil Sam le#
SS- 13(0 -1')
SS- 13(3 -4')
SS- 13(3 -4')
SS- 13N(0 -1')
SS- 13N.2(0 -1')
SS- 13N.2(3 -4')
SS- 13S(0 -1')
SS- 135.2(0 -1')
SS- 13E(0 -1')
SS- 13W(0 -1')
Sample Date
8/19/2016
8/19/2016
12/20/2016
8/19/2016
12/20/2016
12/20/2016
8/19/2016
12/20/2016
8/19/2016
8/19/2016
Sample
Location:
Depth (ft):
0.5 to 1 foot
2 to 3 foot
3 to 4 foot
0.5 to 1 foot
0.5 to 1 foot
3 to 4 foot
0.5 to 1 foot
0.5 to 1 foot
0.5 to 1 foot
0.5 to 1 foot
Contaminant Concentrations
Contaminant
TEF
SS- 13(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
SS- 13(3 -4')
(mg /kg)
SS- 13(3 -4')
(mg /kg)
SS- 13N(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
SS- 13N.2(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
SS- 13N.2(3 -4')
(mg /kg)
SS- 13S(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
SS- 135.2(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
SS- 13E(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
SS- 13W(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
Benzo(a)pyrene
1.0
1.3
0.14
0.27
0.85
0.11
0.067
0.046
Benzo a anthracene
0.1
1
0.008
0.05
0.68
0.0115
0.0105
0.0095
Benzo b fluoranthene
0.1
1.7
0.19
0.46
1.2
0.15
0.095
0.07
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
0.01
0.66
0.08
0.13
0.46
0.065
0.041
0.03
Chrysene
0.001
1.2
0.1
0.3
0.86
0.087
0.043
0.03
Dibenz a,h anthracene
1.0
0.33
0.036
0.071
0.17
0.026
0.012
0.0105
Indeno(1,2,3- cd)pyrene
0.1
0.98
0.12
0.23
1 0.56
0.078
0.061
0.046
Benzo(a)pyrene
Equivalents
Contaminant
TEF
66-1,3(u-1
(mg /kg)
66-1,3(3-4)
(mg /kg)
- -
(mg /kg)
-
(mg /kg)
- -
(mg /kg)
66-13N.2(3-4)
(mg /kg)
66-1,36(U-1
(mg /kg)
66-1,36.2(U-1
(mg /kg)
- - 1
(mg /kg)
66-1,31777-77'
(mg /kg)
Benzo(a)pyrene
1.0
1.3000
0.1400
0.0000
0.2700
0.8500
0.0000
0.1100
0.0000
0.0670
0.0460
Benzo a anthracene
0.1
0.1000
0.0008
0.0000
0.0050
0.0680
0.0000
0.0012
0.0000
0.0011
0.0010
Benzo b fluoranthene
0.1
0.1700
0.0190
0.0000
0.0460
0.1200
0.0000
0.0150
0.0000
0.0095
0.0070
Benzo k fluoranthene
0.01
0.0066
0.0008
0.0000
0.0013
0.0046
0.0000
0.0007
0.0000
0.0004
0.0003
Chrysene
0.001
0.0012
0.0001
0.0000
0.0003
0.0009
0.0000
0.0001
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Dibenz a,h anthracene
1.0
0.3300
0.0360
0.0000
0.0710
0.1700
0.0000
0.0260
0.0000
0.0120
0.0105
Indeno 1,2,3 -cd rene
1 0.1
1 0.0980
0.0120
0.0000
0.0230
0.0560
0.0000
0.0078
1 0.0000
0.0061
0.0046
Total Equivalents
Total Benzo(a)pyrene Equivalents 2.0 0.2 0.0 0.4
1 1.3 0.0 0.2 1 0.0 1 0.1 0.1
Comparisons to SCTLs
Does This Sample Exceed:
SS-1 3(0-1
(mg /kg)
SS-1 3(3-4')
(mg /kg)
SS-1 3(3-4')
(mg /kg)
SS- 13N(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
SS- 13N.2(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
SS- 13N.2(3 -4')
(mg /kg)
SS- 1 3S(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
SS- 13S.2(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
SS- 1 3E(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
SS- 13W(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
The Residential Direct Exposure SCTL of
0.1 mg /kg?
EXCEEDS
EXCEEDS
OK
EXCEEDS
EXCEEDS
OK
EXCEEDS
OK
OK
OK
The Industrial Direct Exposure SCTL of
0.7 mg /kg?
EXCEEDS
OK
OK
OK
EXCEEDS
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
No Alternative SCTL Given
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
No Site Specific Background Given
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
BaPCOnv- - Tables WSSS13 9129291 s�(a)p Teos page 1 of 1
Benzo(a)pyrene Conversion Table
Benzo(a)pyrene Conversion Table
For Direct Exposure Soil Cleanup Target Levels
Instructions can be found below the table
!Facility/Site Name: Phillips Phase II ESA
Site Location: S.R. 419 WinterSprings, FL
Facili /Site ID No.:
TEF = Toxic Equivalency Factor
SCTL Type
Value
Units
Residential Direct Exposure SCTL
0.1
mg/kg
Industrial Direct Exposure SCTL
0.7
mg/kg
Alternative SCTL (Optional)
SS- 17E.2(3 -4')
mg/kg
Site Specific Background (Optional)
Sample Date
mg/kg
BaPCOnv- - Tabieswssn_o129zo16Pagel\e(a)p Teos page 1 of 1
Soil Sam le#
SS- 17(0 -1')
SS- 17(2 -3')
SS- 17N(0 -1')
SS- 17N.2(0 -1')
SS- 17SN.2(34')
SS- 17S(0 -1')
SS- 17E(0 -1')
SS- 17E.2(0 -1')
SS- 17E.2(3 -4')
SS- 17W(0 -1')
Sample Date
8/19/2016
8/19/2016
8/19/2016
12/20/2016
12/20/2016
8/19/2016
8/19/2016
12/20/2016
12/20/2016
8/19/2016
Sample
Location:
Depth (ft):
0.5 to 1 foot
3 to 4 foot
0.5 to 1 foot
0.5 to 1 foot
3 to 4 foot
0.5 to 1 foot
0.5 to 1 foot
0.5 to 1 foot
3 to 4 foot
0.5 to 1 foot
Contaminant Concentrations
Contaminant
TEF
SS- 17(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
SS- 17(2 -3')
(mg /kg)
SS- 17N(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
SS- 17N.2(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
SS- 17SN.2(34')
(mg /kg)
SS- 17S(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
SS- 17E(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
SS- 17E.2(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
SS- 17E.2(3 -4')
(mg /kg)
SS- 17W(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
Benzo(a)pyrene
1.0
0.44
0.05
0.18
0.31
0.043
0.24
0.51
0.29
Benzo a anthracene
0.1
0.27
0.01
0.009
0.01
0.0095
0.065
0.20
0.05
Benzo b fluoranthene
0.1
0.74
0.093
0.32
0.53
0.075
0.4
0.89
0.52
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
0.01
0.24
0.031
0.1
0.23
0.027
0.14
0.32
0.18
Chrysene
0.001
0.54
0.048
0.24
0.36
0.035
0.26
0.58
0.32
Dibenz a,h anthracene
i 1.0
0.16
0.0115
0.05
0.069
0.011
0.06
0.12
0.081
Indeno(1,2,3- cd)pyrene
0.1
0.42
0.053
0.16
0.26
0.04
0.22
1 0.45
1
0.29
Benzo(a)pyrene
Equivalents
Contaminant
TEF
66-1 -
(mg /kg)
- -
(mg /kg)
-
(mg /kg)
- -
(mg /kg)
-
(mg /kg)
- -
(mg /kg)
- -
(mg /kg)
- -
(mg /kg)
- -
(mg /kg)
- -
(mg /kg)
Benzo(a)pyrene
1.0
0.4400
0.0500
0.1800
0.3100
0.0000
0.0430
0.2400
0.5100
0.0000
0.2900
Benzo a anthracene
0.1
0.0270
0.0010
0.0009
0.0010
0.0000
0.0010
0.0065
0.0200
0.0000
0.0050
Benzo b fluoranthene
0.1
0.0740
0.0093
0.0320
0.0530
0.0000
0.0075
0.0400
0.0890
0.0000
0.0520
Benzo k fluoranthene
0.01
0.0024
0.0003
0.0010
0.0023
0.0000
0.0003
0.0014
0.0032
0.0000
0.0018
Chrysene
0.001
0.0005
0.0000
0.0002
0.0004
0.0000
0.0000
0.0003
0.0006
0.0000
0.0003
Dibenz a,h anthracene
1.0
0.1600
0.0115
0.0500
0.0690
0.0000
0.0110
0.0600
0.1200
0.0000
0.0810
Indeno 1,2,3 -cd rene
1 0.1
1 0.0420
0.0053
0.0160
0.0260
0.0000
0.0040
0.0220
1 0.0450
0.0000
0.0290
Total Equivalents
Total Benzo(a)pyrene Equivalents 0.7 0.1 0.3 0.5
1 0.0 0.1 0.4 1 0.8 1 0.0 1 0.5
Comparisons to SCTLs
Does This Sample Exceed:
SS-1 7(0-1
(mg /kg)
SS-1 7(2-3')
(mg /kg)
SS- 17N(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
SS- 17N.2(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
SS- 17SN.2(3 -4')
(mg /kg)
SS- 1 7S(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
SS- 1 7E(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
SS- 17E.2(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
SS- 17E.2(3A')
(mg /kg)
SS- 17W(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
The Residential Direct Exposure SCTL of
0.1 mg /kg?
EXCEEDS
OK
EXCEEDS
EXCEEDS
OK
OK
EXCEEDS
EXCEEDS
OK
EXCEEDS
The Industrial Direct Exposure SCTL of
0.7 mg /kg?
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
EXCEEDS
OK
OK
No Alternative SCTL Given
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
No Site Specific Background Given
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
BaPCOnv- - Tabieswssn_o129zo16Pagel\e(a)p Teos page 1 of 1
Benzo(a)pyrene Conversion Table
Benzo(a)pyrene Conversion Table
For Direct Exposure Soil Cleanup Target Levels
Instructions can be found below the table
!Facility/Site Name: Phillips Phase II ESA
Site Location: S.R. 419 WinterSprings, FL
Facili /Site ID No.:
TEF = Toxic Equivalency Factor
SCTL Type
Value
Units
Residential Direct Exposure SCTL
0.1
mg/kg
Industrial Direct Exposure SCTL
0.7
mg/kg
Alternative SCTL (Optional)
mg/kg
Site Specific Background (Optional)
Sample Date
mg/kg
BaPCOnv- - Tabieswssn_o129zo16Pagez\e(a)p Teos page 1 of 1
Soil Sam le#
SS- 17W(0 -1')
SS- 17W.2(0 -1')
Sample Date
8/19/2016
12/20/2016
Sample
Location:
Depth (ft):
0.5 to 1 foot
0.5 to 1 foot
Contaminant Concentrations
Contaminant
TEF
SS- 17W(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
SS- 17W.2(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
Benzo(a)pyrene
1.0
0.29
0.055
Benzo a anthracene
0.1
0.05
0.0075
Benzo b fluoranthene
0.1
0.52
0.099
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
0.01
0.18
0.035
Chrysene
0.001
0.32
0.064
Dibenz a,h anthracene
1.0
0.081
0.0085
Indeno(1,2,3- cd)pyrene
0.1
0.29
0.053
Benzo(a)pyrene
Equivalents
Contaminant
TEF
(mg /kg)
(mg /kg)
Benzo(a)pyrene
1.0
0.2900
0.0550
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Benzo a anthracene
0.1
0.0050
0.0008
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Benzo b fluoranthene
0.1
0.0520
0.0099
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Benzo k fluoranthene
0.01
0.0018
0.0004
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Chrysene
0.001
0.0003
0.0001
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Dibenz a,h anthracene
1.0
0.0810
0.0085
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Indeno 1,2,3 -cd rene
0.1
0.0290
0.0053
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total Equivalents
Total Benzo(a)pyrene Equivalents 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.0
1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Comparisons to SCTLs
Does This Sample Exceed:
SS- 1 7W(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
SS- 17W.2(0 -1')
(mg /kg)
The Residential Direct Exposure SCTL of
0.1 mg /kg?
EXCEEDS
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
The Industrial Direct Exposure SCTL of
0.7 mg /kg?
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
No Alternative SCTL Given
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
No Site Specific Background Given
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
BaPCOnv- - Tabieswssn_o129zo16Pagez\e(a)p Teos page 1 of 1