HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016 12 12 Public Hearing 400 Ordinance 2016-10, Second Reading, Transportation Impact FeesCOMMISSION AGENDA
ITEM 400
December 12, 2016
Regular Meeting
REQUEST:
The Community Development Department
final adoption the Second Reading of
Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance.
SYNOPSIS:
Informational
Consent
Public Hearings
X
Regular
KS
City Manager
is
Department
requesting the City Commission approve for
Ordinance No. 2016 -10 updating the City's
A Transportation Impact Fee Study was recently completed for the City by Raftelis
Financial Consultants, Inc. in October 2016. The purpose of the study was to review and
update the City's transportation impact fees, which were last updated in 2005. This agenda
item is for the second reading and final adoption of Ordinance No. 2016 -10, updating the
Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance including the rate schedule.
CONSIDERATIONS:
. Transportation Impact Fees are established by local governments to require new
development to pay their equitable share of public transportation improvements that
must be constructed to serve new growth.
The City's Transportation Impact Fee ordinance and fee schedule was last updated in
March 2005 (Ordinance 2005 -10). The current Transportation Impact Fee schedule is
out of date and needs to be updated to reflect recent development trends as well as the
City's projected transportation needs. Staff has heard from numerous consultants and
developers that the City's current Transportation Impact Fees are inconsistent with
those of surrounding cities and counties, and this does impact development decisions.
. At the May 9, 2016 City Commission meeting, the Commission authorized the
Public Hearings 400 PAGE 1 OF 3 - December 12, 2016
preparation of a Transportation Impact Fee Study, to be performed by Raftelis
Financial Consultants, Inc.
Exhibit 13 is the 2016 Transportation Impact Fee Study, which was completed in
October 2016 by Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc. The Impact Fee Study updates
the City's Transportation Impact Fees to reflect:
1. Recent development trends
2. Updated capital costs, allocations, and credits
3. Completed and planned City transportation projects
4. Land use categories and associated trip generation rates that meet current
standards and future City growth trends
5. Conformance with state statutes and standard practices for impact fee
calculations
The updated Transportation Impact Fee rate schedule is listed on pages 2 -3 of the
Executive Summary in Exhibit B. The rates have been significantly reduced for most
land uses. The primary reason for the overall reduction in transportation impact fee
rates is the reduction in the "impact fee eligible project costs" due to completion
of many major impact fee projects over the past 10 years.
. Table 1 below shows a comparison of transportation impact fees for Winter Springs
(existing and proposed) and several surrounding agencies.
Table 1
Transportation Impact Fee Comparison
Ordinance 2016 -10 (Exhibit C) amends the city's transportation impact fee
regulations and rate schedule in Section 9 -386 of the City Code. The ordinance
adopts the transportation impact fee rate schedule from the Transportation Impact Fee
Study (Exhibit B). The ordinance also includes text changes that bring the
transportation impact fee schedule up to date and in conformance with the 2016
Transportation Impact Fee Study.
. The first reading of Ordinance 2016 -10 was approved at the November 21, 2016 City
Commission meeting. The second reading includes a revised Ordinance 2016 -10
which fills in several technical blanks and revises the Effective Date Section.
Public Hearings 400 PAGE 2 OF 3 - December 12, 2016
Winter
Winter
Springs
Springs
Seminole
Land Use
Attributes
Existing
Proposed
Apopka
Casselberry
Orlando
Oviedo
County
Single Famil
Dwelling Unit
$3,167
$1,342
$3,101
$800
$3,818
$1,050
$1,185
Multi-Family
Dwelling Unit
$2,224
$937
$2,178
$517
$2,527
$880
$792
Convenience
Market w/ Gas
6,000 sf, 16
Pumps 16
pumps
$36,041
$32,694
$269,104
$27,588
$76,176
$38,850
$43,184
General Office
Building
50,000 sf
$238,7691
$77,750
$249,7501
$47,850
$211,8501
$90,750
$129,900
Hotel
200 rooms
$373,704
$265,800
$642,400
$81,400
$506,600
$120,600
$165,800
Retail Small
7,500 sf
$40,098
$32,535
$96,668
$9,788
$46,988
$12,495
$43,148
Shopping
Center/Retail
30,000 sf
$150,7131
$130,140
S386,670
S39,1501
S187,9501
S49,980
$172 590
Supermarket
30,000 sf
1 $391,928
$106,470
$386,670
$52,590
$233,700
S45,4801
$174,000
Ordinance 2016 -10 (Exhibit C) amends the city's transportation impact fee
regulations and rate schedule in Section 9 -386 of the City Code. The ordinance
adopts the transportation impact fee rate schedule from the Transportation Impact Fee
Study (Exhibit B). The ordinance also includes text changes that bring the
transportation impact fee schedule up to date and in conformance with the 2016
Transportation Impact Fee Study.
. The first reading of Ordinance 2016 -10 was approved at the November 21, 2016 City
Commission meeting. The second reading includes a revised Ordinance 2016 -10
which fills in several technical blanks and revises the Effective Date Section.
Public Hearings 400 PAGE 2 OF 3 - December 12, 2016
. The new transportation impact fee rates will be effective upon adoption for the rates
that are decreasing. For the five land uses with rates that are increasing, these will be
effective March 1, 2017.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The new transportation impact fee rate schedule reduces City transportation impact fees for
almost all residential and commercial land uses. The reduction in future transportation
impact fee revenues is offset by a corresponding reduction in both the number and cost of
the future projects planned to be funded by transportation impact fees.
COMMUNICATION EFFORTS:
This Agenda Item has been electronically forwarded to the Mayor and City Commission,
City Manager, City Attorney /Staff, and is available on the City's Website, LaserFiche, and
the City's Server. Additionally, portions of this Agenda Item are typed verbatim on the
respective Meeting Agenda which has also been electronically forwarded to the individuals
noted above, and which is also available on the City's Website, LaserFiche, and the City's
Server; has been sent to applicable City Staff, Media/Press Representatives who have
requested Agendas /Agenda Item information, Homeowner's Associations/Representatives
on file with the City, and all individuals who have requested such information. This
information has also been posted outside City Hall, posted inside City Hall with additional
copies available for the General Public, and posted at six (6) different locations around the
City. Furthermore, this information is also available to any individual requestors. City Staff
is always willing to discuss this Agenda Item or any Agenda Item with any interested
individuals.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Commission approve the second and final reading adopting
Ordinance No. 2016 -10 updating the City's Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance.
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit A - Copy of Legal Ad (1 page)
Exhibit B - 2016 Transportation Impact Fee Study (36 pages)
Exhibit C - Ordinance 2016 -10 (30 pages)
Public Hearings 400 PAGE 3 OF 3 - December 12, 2016
EXHIBIT A
Thursday, December 1, 2016 Orlando Sentinel 1 05
Legal
Noboices
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT
THE CITY COMMISSION
PROPOSES TO CONSIDER:
ORDINANCE 2016.10
/ Pace
Brandon Samuel Bass
Sabrina Elizabeth Willis / Sabrina
Willis
Aaron Peterkin / Aaron Ann Peterkin
Shaun Heinen / Shaun E Heinen .
daug Ids W Whaley / Doug Whaley
Michael Hart / Michael Hunt / Michael
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY K Hart / Michael K Hunt / Michael
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF Kasey Hart/ Michael Kasey Hurt
WINTER SPRINGS, SEMINOLE Mary Elizabeth Hindman / Mary
COUNTY, FLORIDA; AMENDING Hindman
THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
ROAD IMPACT FEE REGULATIONS NOTICE OF PUBLIC SALE:
AND SCHEDULE SET FORTH IN Self- storage unit contents of the
THE CITY CODE; PROVIDING following customers containing
FOR THE REPEAL OF PRIOR household and
INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES AND other goods will be sold for cash
RESOLUTIONS, INCORPORATION by CubeSmart # 6174 - 1004 North
INTO THE CODE, SEVERABILITY, Hoagland Blvd. Kissimmee, FI. 34741 to
AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE, satisfy a lien on Thursday, December
15th, 2016 at approx 1:30 PM at www.
storagetreasures.com :
PUBLIC HEARING
FOR SECOND READING
WILL BE HELD ON
MONDAY, DECEMBER 12, 2016 AT
5:15 P.M: OR SOON THEREAFTER
IN THE COMMISSION CHAMBERS
LOCATED AT THE WINTER SPRINGS
CITY HALL 1126 EAST STATE ROAD
434 WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA.
THE CITY COMMISSION RESERVES
THE RIGHT TO POSTPONE OR
CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING
ON THIS ORDINANCE AT THIS
MEETING WITHOUT FURTHER
NOTICE.
The proposed Ordinance may be
inspected by interested parties
between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, at the City's Clerk's
Office, located at 7126 East State Road
434, Winter Springs, Florida. For
more information call (407) 327.1800,
Extension 227. Interested parties may
appear at the meeting and be heard
with respect to the proposed ordinance.
Persons with disabilities needing
assistance to participate in any Of
Coordinator, 48 hours in advance of the
meeting at (407) 327 -1800, Extension
236. These ore public hearings. If you
decide to appeal any recommendation/
decision made by the City Commission
with respect to any matter considered
at this meeting, you will need a record
of the proceedings, and for such
Purposes' you may need to ensure that
a verbatim record of the proceedings is
made upon which the appeal is based.
Interested parties are advised that
they may appear at the meeting and
be heard with respect to the proposed
ordinance.
THIS IS A LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT
054591270 121112016
NOTICE OF SALE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the
undersigned intends to sell the personal
Property described below to enforce a
lien imposed on said property under
The Florida Self Storage Facility Act
Statutes (Section 83.801 - 83.809). The
undersigned will sell at public sale by
competitive bidding on_Mondav,, the
Florida Delux Villas LLC/ Greg
Woodhams
Barbara A Lucchini/ Raymond
Lucchini
William McCray Jr/ William McCray
McCray/ William McCroy
Douglas Shirey
Bonnie Sue NeMon/ Bonnie Newton
Douglas Shirey
John Harrison/ John C Harrison/ Tonle
Riffe
John Patrick/ John Louis Luster
Patrick
Deguerre Pierre
Davie Albarran/ David Albarran
Diaz
M
NOTICE OF PUBLIC SALE:
Self - storage unit contents of the
following customers containing
household and
other goods will be sold for cash by
CubeSmart # 6177 - 1830 East Irlo
Bronson Memorial Hwy. Kissimmee,
Fl. 34744 to satisfy a lien on Thursday,
December 15th, 2016 at approx 2;30
PM at www.storagetreasures.com:
Edward Charles Cowart
Edward Charles Cowart
George Martinez
Ebony lasho Bates
Lismory Moore
Dylan Thomas Male
Mike Davis
Anton SPruell / Jocelyn SpruelI
Karen lyn Vacek / Karen L. Vacek
Jean Franck
Daniel Joseph Dabrowski iii
Pura Lozada Wiscovitch
Shalim Martinez
NOTICE OF PUBLIC SALE:
Self - storage unit contents of the
following customers containing
household and
other goods will be sold for cash by
CubeSmart # 6295 - 11920 West Colonial
Drive, Ocoee, FL 34761 to satisfy a
lien an Thursday. December 15Th,
2016 at approx 3:30 PM at www.
storagetreasu res. com:
Andre Boyd
Matthew Alexander Cliff
chandlse-�
RAINBOW CHASE
-6300 LAKE WILSON RD, DEC. 3
FROM 8:00 AM TO 1:00 PM.
WINTER PARK
Cul -de -sac. Friday 7212 & Saturday
1213 BAM -12PM. Large clothes, tools,
kitchen, shoes, furniture & more. 4941
Ardmore Dr. 407- 701 -7229
E i k. __A1
p
ENGLISH SPRINGER SPANIEL PUPPIES
AKC. Liver & White. 3 females $7001
ea. 386-365 -5742 386 -365 -0895
POMMERANIAN
Male, exotic black color. Call for
more information. 386 320 -8893
flealEsbabe
ft forRenb
ALTAMONTE SPRINGS
212, Den, DR, Wd Firs, W/D Hook Up,
1 Car gar, Cvrd Patio, Pool, Fitness,
4361434, No Pets, $1,095. 864 - 525.0051
APOPKA \ WEKIWA
3\2, tile, 2 car Gar., 2,100 Sq \Ft, Exc.
Cond., Pointed, $1,250 mo. 407. 814.1008
EXHIBIT B
C' OF 0
WINTER SPRINGS Incorporated 1959
2016 Transportation Impact Fee
Study
October 28, 2016
M179-1 Littl�)ohi
An S M Com an
& p
rf
RAFTELIS
FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS, INC.
October 28, 2016
Brian Fields
City Engineer
City of Winter Springs
1126 East State Road 434
Winter Springs, FL 32708
950 S. Winter Park Drive Phone 407.960.1806 www.raftells.com
Suite 240 Fax 407.960.1803
Casselberry, FL 32707
Subject: 2016 Transportation Impact Fee Study
Dear Mr. Fields,
Enclosed is the transportation impact fee update report for your use and reference. The attached
report includes an executive summary followed by technical sections regarding the calculation of the
impact fee by land use with additional background information. It has been a pleasure working with
you, and we thank you and the City staff for the support provided during the course of this study.
Sincerely,
RAFTELIS FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS, INC.
Tony Hairston
Senior Manager
Joe Williams
Consultant
Littlejohn Engineering
Stephanie Shealey, PE
Project Engineer
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................. ..............................1
BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY ........................................................ ............................... 1
LANDUSE UPDATE ........................................................................... ............................... 1
CITY ROAD IMPROVEMENTS ............................................................ ............................... 1
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS ........................ ............................... 1
COMPARISON TO OTHER LOCAL COMMUNITIES .......................... ............................... 1
SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION AND SERVICE AREA PROJECTED
DEVELOPMENT .......................................................... ..............................2
INTRODUCTION................................................................................. ............................... 2
IMPACT FEE BACKGROUND ............................................................ ............................... 2
SCOPEOF SERVICES ....................................................................... ............................... 3
EXISTING TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES ................................. ............................... 4
SERVICE AREA PROJECTED DEVELOPMENT ................................ ............................... 5
SUMMARYOF REPORT ..................................................................... ............................... 6
SECTION 2. TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS ............. ..............................7
GENERAL........................................................................................... ............................... 7
PROJECTED FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ............................................ ............................... 7
STATE PLANNED AND PROGRAMMED IMPROVEMENTS ............... .............................10
EXISTING ROADWAY ANALYSIS ....................................................... .............................11
FUTURE ROADWAY ANALYSIS ......................................................... .............................11
TRIP GENERATION ............................................................................. .............................14
SECTION 3. CITY ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS AND TRIP RATE
ANALYSIS.................................................................. .............................15
GENERAL............................................................................................ .............................15
CITY ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS ........................................... .............................15
AVERAGE COST PER TRIP CALCULATION ...................................... .............................17
CreditConsiderations .................................................................................. .............................18
SECTION 4. LAND USES AND IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS ............19
GENERAL............................................................................................ .............................19
IMPACT FEE METHODOLOGY ........................................................... .............................19
IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE .................................................................... .............................21
Transportation Impact Fee Study
LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES
Table ES- 1. Average Cost per Trip .......................................................... ............................... 2
Table ES- 2. Updated Impact Fee Schedule ............................................ ...............................
2
Table ES- 3. Comparison to Other Local Communities .......................... ...............................
1
Table 1. Existing Transportation Impact Fees ........................................ ...............................
4
Table 2. Future Development by Land Use ............................................. ...............................
5
Table 3. Future versus Existing Development ........................................ ...............................
6
Figure 1 — Existing OUATS Model for the City of Winter Springs .......... ...............................
8
Figure 2 — Revised OUATS Model for Impact Fee Analysis ................... ...............................
8
Table 4. Residential Development Assumed by TAZ .............................. ...............................
9
Table 5. Employment Development Assumed by TAZ ............................ .............................10
Table 6. State Planned and Programmed Improvements ........................ .............................11
Table 7. Existing Roadway Level of Service ............................................ .............................12
Table 8. No -Build Roadway Level of Service ........................................... .............................12
Table 9. Roadway Level of Service Projection ......................................... .............................13
Table 10. Comparison of No -Build and Projected Development Volumes ..........................13
Table 11. Projected Development by TAZ ................................................ .............................14
Table 12. Projected Development Trip Generation .................................. .............................14
Table 13. City Planned Roadway Improvements and Allocations .......... .............................16
Figure 3. Roadway Improvements Map .................................................... .............................17
Table 14. Average Cost per Trip ................................................................ .............................17
Table 15. Existing and Proposed Land Uses ........................................... .............................19
Table 16. Updated Impact Fee Schedule .................................................. .............................22
Transportation Impact Fee Study
This page intentionally left blank to facilitate two -sided printing.
Transportation Impact Fee Study
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
The City of Winter Springs (the "City ") currently charges a transportation impact fee pursuant to City
Code section 9 -386. The transportation impact fees were established with the purpose of defraying
costs of local road infrastructure costs necessary to meet the demands of future development The
transportation impact fee was last updated in 2005. The City has engaged Raftelis Financial
Consultants, Inc. ( "RFC) for the purpose of developing updated transportation impact fees based on
current and localized data and to ensure that the appropriate level of revenue will be generated from
future development for road projects. For this project RFC has assembled a project team ( "RFC
Team ") that includes Littlejohn Engineering and Susan Schoettle -Gumm, Esq. to provide traffic
engineering and legal support, respectively.
LAND USE UPDATE
The purpose of the study is to update the overall transportation impact fee levels but to also review
and update the 46 land uses within the current fee schedule. Based on discussions with the City, as
well as review of existing land use categories in the fee schedule, and the anticipated future
development within the City, Table 15 in Section 4 has been developed to compare the existing land
uses with those recommended to be established in this update. As provided on Table 15, the number
of land uses has been consolidated down to 39 categories based on a comprehensive review of
transportation data and development trends.
CITY ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
The City has developed a road improvement project list that is designed to meet the transportation
needs of the City based on the projected development schedule that the City maintains. These roads
serve a variety of purposes such as new turn lanes to reduce congestion of existing and future traffic
demands and completely new roadways that will primarily serve new developments. These projects
have been discussed in detail by City staff and the RFC Team and have been appropriately allocated
to existing and future development, as further discussed in Section 3. The total cost of projects is
$15,375,000 of which impact fees are identified as one of the funding sources.
TRANSPORTATION IMPArT FEE CALCULATIONF
The transportation impact fee calculation is based on determining two primary formula components:
i) Average Cost per Trip: the portion of each impact fee eligible project allocated to future
development, reduced by existing impact fee funds available, divided by the anticipated one -
way trips generated by the future development.
ii) Equivalent Trip Factor by Land Use: determined by using various traffic and trip generation
factors such as ITE trip rates, trip length ratios and percentage of trips that are new for each
land use. This methodology is discussed further in Section 4. The equivalent trip factor by
land use is provided in full detail in Exhibit 1.
A key element of the impact fee analysis is to calculate the average cost per trip. This calculation
involves dividing the impact fee eligible projects by the new one way trips generated by new growth.
Executive Summary 1 1
Impact fee eligible project costs are reduced by available impact fee funds to derive the average cost
per trip as shown on Table ES -1:
Table ES- 1. Average Cost per Trip
Impact Fee Identified Project Costs [1] $7,622,500
Less: Impact Fee Funds Available , 532,000
Total Costs for Impact Fees $7,090,500
New 1 -Way Trips [2] 32,675
Average Cost per Trip $217.00
1. Obtained from Table 13.
2. Obtained from Table 12.
Using the average cost per trip, the proposed land uses, and the equivalent trip factor by land use as
detailed in Exhibit 1 the following table provides the calculated transportation impact fee schedule:
Table ES- 2. Undated Impact Fee Schedule
Residential
210
Single Family DU
$1,342.00
220
Multi- Family
DU
$937.00
240
Mobile Home Park
DU
$703.00
254
Assisted Living Facility
Bed
$375.00
253
Congregate Care
DU
$284.00
Office
710
General Office Building
1,000 SF GFA
$1,555.00
720
Medical/Dental Office Building
1,000 SF GFA
$5,096.00
Institutional
560
Church
1,000 SF GFA
$1,186.00
565
Day Care Center
1,000 SF GFA
$3,214.00
536
Private School
Student
$2,317.00
Medical
610
Hospital
1,000 SF GFA
$1,864.00
620
Nursing Home
Bed
$386.00
630
Clinic
1,000 SF GFA
$4,436.00
Commercial
815
Discount Store
1,000 SF GFA
$3,347.00
816
Hardware /Paint Store
1,000 SF GFA
$2,470.00
817
Nursery /Garden Store
1,000 SF GFA
$3,827.00
Shopping Center /Retail:
820
0 - 50,000 sf
1,000 SF GLA
$4,338.00
820
50,001 sf - 100,000 sf
1,000 SF GLA
$3,404.00
820
100,001 sf and greater
1,000 SF GLA
$2,140.00
Executive Summary 1 2
848
Tire Store
1,000 SF GFA
$1,384.00
850
Supermarket
1,000 SF GFA
$3,549.00
851
Con. Str (24hr) w/o gas
1,000 SF GFA
$7,847.00
862
Home Improvement Superstore
1,000 SF GFA
$1,354.00
890
Furniture store
1,000 SF GFA
$335.00
931
Quality Restaurant
1,000 SF GFA
$7,104.00
932
High Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant
1,000 SF GFA
$5,504.00
933
Fast Food Restaurant w /out Drive -thru
1,000 SF GFA
$27,733.00
934
Fast Food Restaurant w /Drive -thru
1,000 SF GFA
$19,216.00
942
Auto Care Center
1,000 SF GFA
$688.00
853
Convenience Market w/ Gas Pumps
1,000 SF GFA
$5,449.00
945
Gas Service Station w/ Convenience
Fueling Position
$1,342.00
947
Self Service Car Wash
Stall
$4,007.00
Services
911
Walk in Bank
1,000 SF GFA
$2,278.00
912
Drive in Bank
1,000 SF GFA
$4,565.00
Recreational
430
Golf Course
Acre
$656.00
444
Movie Theater
Screen
$28,033.00
492
Health/Fitness Club
1,000 SF GFA
$6,083.00
Lodging
310
Hotel
Room
$1,329.00
Industrial
110
General Light Industrial
1,000 SF GFA
$983.00
150
Warehousing
1,000 SF GFA
$502.00
151
Mini - warehouse
1,000 SF GFA
$352.00
Note: Impact Fees rounded down to nearest dollar.
Executive Summary 1 3
COMPARISON TO OTHER LOCAL COMMUNITIES
The following table has been provided to illustrate the level of impact fees charged by other local entities based on their published impact
fees at the time of this report. One important note is that the Seminole County impact fees shown would be assessed in addition to any
development occurring in any City within Seminole County.
Table ES- 3. Comparison to Other Local Communities
Winter Winter
Attributes Springs Springs
Existing MM
Proposed
Single Family D.U. $3,166.91 $1,342.00 $3,101.00 $800.00
Multi- Family D.U. $2,223.79 $937.00 $2,178.00 $517.00
Convenience Market w/
Gas Pumps 6,000 sf
$36,040.56
$32,694.00
$269,104.00
$27,588.00
General Office Building 50,000 sf
$238,769.00
$77,750.00
$249,750.00
$47,850.00
Hotel 200 rooms
$373,704.00
$265,800.00
$642,400.00
$81,400.00
Retail (Small) 7,500 sf
$40,097.55
$32,535.00
$96,667.50
$9,787.50
Shopping Center /Retail 30,000 sf
$150,712.80
$130,140.00
$386,670.00
$39,150.00
Supermarket 30,000 sf .
$391,927.80
$106,470.00
$386,670.00
$52,590.00
[1] Assumed 16 pumps for convenience market with gas pumps.
[2] Impact fees shown are for the non - downtown area.
Assumed 16 pumps for convenience market with gas pumps.
[3] Impact fees shown are for the South Central area. Assumed 16 pumps
for convenience market with gas
pumps.
$3,818.00
$2,527.00
$76,176.00
$211,850.00
$506,600.00
$46,987.50
$187,950.00
$233,700.00
$1,050.00
$880.00
$38,850.00
$90,750.00
$120,600.00
$12,495.00
$49,980.00
$45,480.00
$1,185.00
$792.00
$43,184.00
$129,900.00
$165,800.00
$43,147.50
$172,590.00
$174,000.00
Other Seminole County Cities not referenced in the table above that do not currently charge transportation impact fees include Altamonte
Springs, Lake Mary, Longwood, and Sanford.
Executive Summary 1 1
SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION AND SERVICE
AREA PROJECTED DEVELOPMENT
INTRODUCTION
The City of Winter Springs (the "City ") currently charges a transportation impact fee pursuant to City
Code section 9 -386. The transportation impact fees were established with the purpose of defraying
local road infrastructure costs necessary to meet the demands of future development. The
transportation impact fee schedule is based on land use type and was last updated in 2005.
IMPACT FEE BACKGROUND
Impact fees are one -time charges established as a means to recover in whole or in part, the costs
associated with infrastructure and capital equipment needed to accommodate the demands
generated by new development Historically, impact fees in Florida were a result of home rule
powers with the requirements associated with the development, administration, accounting and
expenditure governed by case law. However, in 2006, Section 163.31801 was added to the Florida
Statues, which placed specific requirements and limitations on that home rule authority. Florida
Statutes Section 163.31801 F.S., as amended in 2011, is currently as follows:
163.31801 Impact fees; short title; intent; definitions; ordinances levying impact
fees. —
(1) This section may be cited as the "Florida Impact Fee Act."
(2) The Legislature finds that impact fees are an important source of revenue for a local
governmentto use in funding the infrastructure necessitated by new growth. The Legislature
further finds that impact fees are an outgrowth of the home rule power of a local government
to provide certain services within its jurisdiction. Due to the growth of impact fee collections
and local governments' reliance on impact fees, it is the intent of the Legislature to ensure
that, when a county or municipality adopts an impact fee by ordinance or a special district
adopts an impact fee by resolution, the governing authority complies with this section.
(3) An impact fee adopted by ordinance of a county or municipality or by resolution of a
special district must, at minimum:
(a) Require that the calculation of the impact fee be based on the most recent and localized
data.
(b) Provide for accounting and reporting of impact fee collections and expenditures. If a
local governmental entity imposes an impact fee to address its infrastructure needs, the
entity shall account for the revenues and expenditures of such impact fee in a separate
accounting fund.
(c) Limit administrative charges for the collection of impact fees to actual costs.
(d) Require that notice be provided no less than 90 days before the effective date of an
ordinance or resolution imposing a new or increased impact fee. A county or municipality
is not required to wait 90 days to decrease, suspend, or eliminate an impact fee.
(4) Audits of financial statements of local governmental entities and district school boards
which are performed by a certified public accountant pursuant to s.218.39 and submitted to
Section 1. Introduction 1 2
the Auditor General must include an affidavit signed by the chief financial officer of the local
governmental entity or district school board stating that the local governmental entity or
district school board has complied with this section.
(5) In any action challenging an impact fee, the government has the burden of proving by a
preponderance of the evidence that the imposition or amount of the fee meets the
requirements of state legal precedent or this section. The court may not use a deferential
standard.
Although the statute provides specific impact fee criteria, certain precedents established by case law
also constitute the legal requirements associated with impact fees. Case law precedent for impact
fees in Florida was originally set in the landmark Florida Supreme Court decision, Contractors and
Builders Association of Pinellas County vs. City of Dunedin, Florida. In the ruling, the court identified
certain conditions as necessarily present in order to have a valid impact fee. In general, the court
decision addressed the following:
The impact fee should be reasonably equitable to all parties; that is, the amount of the fee
must bear a relationship to the amount of services or facility capacity related to
accommodating the new development,
2. The expenditure of impact fees collected should occur within a reasonable time of collection,
be on improvements that provide additional capacity for demands generated by new
development, and not be used for repair /replacement of existing capital facilities or
operations and maintenance costs; and
The impact fees collected should be retained in a separate account, and separate accounting
must be made for those funds to ensure that they are used only for the lawful purposes
described.
Based on the criteria provided above, the impact fees herein will: 1) include local current costs of
improvements associated with the capacities needed to serve new growth; 2) not include costs of
improvements associated with the renewal and replacement (R &R) of existing capital assets or
correction of deficiencies in level of service attributed to existing development, and 3) not include
costs of operation and maintenance of the capital improvements.
This section provides only a general background regarding impact fees. Certain circumstances and
issues regarding the interpretation of specific statutes or case law should be addressed by qualified
legal counsel.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The City of Winter Springs and Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc. ( "RFC ") entered into a Professional
Services Agreement on May 11, 2016 to perform consulting services for a Transportation Impact Fee
Update. The project team included RFC, Littlejohn Engineering, and Susan Schoettle -Gumm, Esq.
( "RFC Team "). The scope of services provides for a review of the existing and available land use
categories, a review of the City's transportation improvements, allocations of projects to new growth,
and the calculation of new impact fees based on currently available data.
Section 1. Introduction 1 3
EXISTING TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES
The City last had a transportation impact fee study completed in 2005 and adopted pursuant to
Ordinance 2005 -30. The fees adopted pursuant to this study have been maintained and were based
on a prior version of the ITE Manual. The existing impact fees are as follows:
Table 1. Existing Transportation Impact Fees
���
1 1• I i
1
Residential
210
Single - Family Det /Att
$3,166.91
220
Low -rise Apartments
DU
$2,223.79
230
Low -rise Res. Condo
DU
$1,939.19
240
Mobile Home Park
DU
$1,827.65
253
Congregate Care
DU
$512.70
Office
710
General Office Building
1,000 SF GFA
$4,775.38
720
Medical /Dental Off Bld
1,000 SF GFA
$14,509.90
750
Office Park
1,000 SF GFA
$4,168.38
770
Business Park
1,000 SF GFA
$4,263.54
Institutional
560
Church
1,000 SF GFA
$1,931.74
565
Day Care Center
1,000 SF GFA
$3,380.46
591
Lodge /FratemalOrg.
Member
$84.45
Medical
610
Hospital
Bed
$1,897.17
620
Nursing Home
Bed
$380.72
630
Clinic
1,000 SF GFA
$341.36
Commercial
812
Bldg Mat/Lumber Store
1,000 SF GFA
$7,373.53
826
Specialty Retail Center
1,000 SF GLA
$6,340.44
815
Discount Store
1,000 SF GFA
$3,103.34
816
Hardware/Paint Store
1,000 SF GFA
$3,874.52
817
Nursery /Garden Store
1,000 SF GFA
$3,611.73
820
Shopping Center
1,000 SF GLA
$4,298.44
820
Retail
0 - 24,999 sf
1,000 SF GLA
$5,346.34
25,000 - 49,999 sf
1,000 SF GLA
$5,023.76
50,000 - 99,999 sf
1,000 SF GLA
$5,880.23
100,000 - 199,999 sf
1,000 SF GLA
$6,084.86
200,000 - 299,999 sf
1,000 SF GLA
$6,084.87
931
Quality Restaurant
1,000 SF GFA
$19,668.88
932
High Turnover Sit -d.Res
1,000 SF GFA
$8,390.80
933
Fast Food w/o Drivethru
1,000 SF GFA
$32,297.34
934
Fast Food w /Drivethru
1,000 SF GFA
$24,036.69
Section 1. Introduction 1 4
942
Auto Care Center
1,000 SF GLA
$3,770.70
945
Svc Sta w /Convenience
Pump
$1,156.32
947
Self Svc Car Wash
Stall
$5,777.30
848
Tire Store
1,000 SF GFA
$3,177.90
849
Tire Superstore
1,000 SF GFA
$2,601.61
850
Supermarket
1,000 SF GFA
$13,064.26
851
Con. Str (24hr) w/o gas
1,000 SF GFA
$5,242.35
853
Convenience w /gas
1,000 SF GFA
$6,006.76
862
Home improvement store
1,000 SF GFA
$5,529.10
890
Furniture store
1,000 SF GFA
$723.76
Services
911
Walk -in Bank
1,000 SF GFA
$5,565.36
912
Drive -in Bank
1,000 SF GFA
$11,118.67
Recreational
430
Golf Course
Acre
$1,111.46
444
Movie Theater
Screen
$191,719.85
492
Racquet Club
1,000 SF GFA
$4,244.35
Lodging
320
Motel
Room
$1,868.52
Industrial
110
General light industrial
1,000 SF GFA
$3,403.79
130
Industrial Park
1,000 SF GFA
$2,437.37
150
Warehousing
1,000 SF GFA
$2,772.79
151
�i Mini - warehouse
1,000 SF GFA
$875.49
SERVICE AREA PROJECTED DEVELOPMENT
The City maintains detailed service area development projections in a schedule that has been
populated with anticipated redevelopment and growth by land use for each parcel. The table below
summarizes the expected growth by general land use category, which will serve as the basis for cost
allocations, trip generation demand, and impact fee levels.
Table 2. Future Development by Land Use
Description
g
Square Feet
Single Family
726
N/A
Multi- Family
773
N/A
Office
N/A
1,492,050
Commercial
N/A
858,847
Industrial
N/A
24,000
Total
1,499
2,374,897
Section 1. Introduction 1 5
As shown on Table 2 on the previous page, the City is forecasting approximately 1,499 new dwelling
units. This represents an increase over the existing 14,859 dwelling units of around 10 %. Table 3
below presents the forecasted growth and dwelling units in the City based on the development
projections they maintain.
Table 3. Future versus Existing Development
Dwelling Units Square Feet
1• 1
Existing 14,859 1,545,177
Future ME 1,499 2,374,897
Growth % 10% 154%
SUMMARY OF REPORT
Section 2. Transportation Analysis - This section provides data and analysis related to anticipated
future traffic demands resulting from growth identified by the City. The Orlando Urban Area
Transportation model was updated with the current growth projections for the City of Winter
Springs, and used to determine if there are projected to be any capacity deficiencies which would be
the responsibility of the City of Winter Springs and also to determine the significance of traffic from
the projected development on proposed improvements by the City of Winter Springs.
The transportation analysis section also includes projections of the trip generation for the projected
development, based on the ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 9th Edition and the ITE Trip Generation
Manual, 3rd Edition.
Section 3. City Road Improvement Projects and Trip Rate Anal, - This section summarizes
the planned road improvement projects and a discussion of the appropriate allocation of costs
between existing and future development
Section 4. Transportation Impact Fee Anal, - This section summarizes the average cost per
trip, which is then applied to each land use based on the equivalent number of trips generated.
Section 1. Introduction 1 6
SECTION 2. TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS
GENERAL
A transportation analysis was completed for the City of Winter Springs to provide localized data to
input into the formula to calculate the impact fees. The most recent Orlando Urban Area
Transportation model ( OUATS 4.0) was used to estimate the existing and future traffic for the
roadways within the City. The ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 91h Edition and ITE Trip Generation
Manual, 3rd Edition were used to determine specific trip generation and pass -by rates for individual
land uses.
PROJECTED FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
The City of Winter Springs identified the existing development within City boundaries, as well as
anticipated growth through a projected development schedule that the City maintains and updates
frequently. Data was provided for single - family homes, multi - family homes, industrial, retail, office,
and public land uses. This data was used to update the socio- economic data for the Traffic Analysis
Zones (TAZs) within the OUATS model.
There are currently 19 TAZs in the OUATS model which encompass a portion of the City of Winter
Springs (TAZs 81, 96- 99,109 -117, 138,140 -143, and 187). Within the City, the model includes seven
roadways: SR 434, SR 419, SR 417, North Winter Park Drive, North Edgemon Avenue, Tuskawilla
Road (south of SR 434), and Winter Springs Boulevard.
The following existing, planned and programmed roadway improvements were added to the model
for analysis:
• Florida Avenue - added existing roadway east of US 17 -92, and extension south to meet SR
434 at Winter Park Drive;
• Tuskawilla Road -added existing roadway north of SR 434 to Orange Avenue;
• Orange Avenue - added existing roadway west of Tuskawilla Road, and programmed &
planned further extensions to SR 434 at western edge of Central Winds Park;
• Michael Blake Boulevard - added existing roadway east of Tuskawilla Road, along with
upgraded eastern section to SR 434, southern section between Tuskawilla Road and SR 434,
and western section to meet with Solaris Wharf Street, and
• East -West GID Road - added roadway from SR 434 @ Creeks' Run Way to SR 434 @ Vistawilla
Drive to parallel SR 434.
Four TAZs were split to better estimate traffic on these new roadways. The eastern portion of TAZ
99 became TAZ 231, the northwestern portion of TAZ 115 became TAZ 232, the northeastern portion
of TAZ 112 became TAZ 233, and the portion of TAZ 114 west of SR 417 became TAZ 234.
Section 2. Transportation Analysis 1 7
rigure 1 - txistmg UUAI J Ivioaei ror the Lity OI winter JnrmEs
Figure 2 - Revised OUATS Model for Impact Fee Analysis
TAZ
81 V� TAZ TAZ
TAZ 98 99 TAZ
96 A 434- 2
AZ TAZ
-434 TA 113 234
TAZ TAZ TAZ 23
109 TAZ 111 112 A
434
110 232 TAZ TAZ
TAZ
115 116
3
138 TAZ Winter � 5prinys
Seminola Blv 140 TAZ
TAZ
141 142
a�
C
3 7
Red Bug Lake R
TAZ
117
Section 2. Transportation Analysis 1 8
TAZ
114
Legend
Roadways in OUATS Model
- Roadways Added to OUATS
92
/
7
417
TA
'_.....�.
81
TAZ
419 TAZ
TAZ
Z
�8
99
114
A
A34�
,434
TAZ =
TAZ
TAZ
113
109 TAZ
111
112
�
g34
TAZ
17 110
115
116
TAZ
qZ
� yy iter
rin SRI
117
Geneva or
38
TAZ
426
SeminolaBpd
1
TAZ
TAZ
141
142
a
3
Legend
7
Winter Springs City Limits
Red Bu Lake Rd
$2¢,
Roadways in OUATS Model
Figure 2 - Revised OUATS Model for Impact Fee Analysis
TAZ
81 V� TAZ TAZ
TAZ 98 99 TAZ
96 A 434- 2
AZ TAZ
-434 TA 113 234
TAZ TAZ TAZ 23
109 TAZ 111 112 A
434
110 232 TAZ TAZ
TAZ
115 116
3
138 TAZ Winter � 5prinys
Seminola Blv 140 TAZ
TAZ
141 142
a�
C
3 7
Red Bug Lake R
TAZ
117
Section 2. Transportation Analysis 1 8
TAZ
114
Legend
Roadways in OUATS Model
- Roadways Added to OUATS
Socio- economic data for each of the TAZ's was calculated from the existing and projected
development data provided by the City for the portion of the TAZ within the City boundary, and
estimated for the portion of the TAZ outside of the City boundary, as shown in Table 4 and Table S.
able 4. Residential Development Assumed by TAZ
�W
81 497
96 418
97 445
98 0
99 499
109 3
110 1,054
111 1,101
112 1,245
113 233
114 113
115 808
116 808
117 1
138 181
140 625
141 1,366
142 1,122
143 124
187 0
231 34
232 0
233 176
234 0
•O � �
o� M O A
0 70 567
155 90 663
0 0 445
0 0 0
0 0 499
0 468 471
13 0 1,067
26 0 1,127
0 0 1,245
30 0 263
98 50 261
0 0 808
0 0 808
0 1,088 1,089
10 80 271
9 110 744
0 jM� 1,476
1 0 1,123
0 IMIr— 124
0 584 584
5 I= 39
379 0 379
0 I= 176
0 0 0
11117
h
�W o. M O
356 0 0 356
1,091 0 0 1,091
579 0 0 579
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 1,612 1,612
40 0 0 40
487 0 0 487
170 0 0 170
0 279 0 279
88 0 0 88
480 0 0 480
252 0 0 252
0 0 80 80
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
8 0 0 8
47 0 0 47
0 0 0 0
0 0 165 165
456 134 1 M-
0 0 0 0
161 0 0 IMVW
0 360 0 0
Section 2. Transportation Analysis 1 9
Table 5. EmDlovment Development Assumed by TAZ
�• U o
. .2
'4= N •2
V)
W o. M O
81 8 0 0
96 0 5 0
97 56 28 0
98 0 3 0
99 7 0 0
109 0 0 30
110 95 0 0
111 33 17 0
112 0 0 0
113 0 150 0
114 13 0 20
115 0 0 0
116 0 8 0
117 0 100 50
138 0 0 0
140 0 0 0
141 9 0 0
142 45 15 0
143 0 0 387
187 0 0 100
231 0 0 0
232 0 0 0
233 134 36 0
234 0 1,135 0
N
0
8
5
84
3
7
30
95
50
0
150
33
0
8
150
0
0
9
60
387
100
0
0
170
1,135
S."
W 0.
7 0
59 170
156 37
45 0
0 0
17 4
23 0
16 18
0 100
3 100
0 6
2 100
192 77
0 6
0 0
0 0
54 0
30 0
0 0
0 100
201 77
0 100
71 100
0 35
or '
N
O Eo-
90 97
80 309
0 193
0 45
0 0
90 111
0 23
0 33
0 100
0 103
14 20
0 102
0 269
0 6
0 0
0 0
0 54
0 30
162 162
796 896
0 278
0 100
0 171
0 35
� � v
�• U o 'C
• O
w o� M O E-
22 0 78 100
22 0 30 52
1 0 0 1
130 15 0 145
0 0 0 0
199 9 0 208
0 ��N 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 -1 0 0
0 0 2 2
20 1 &0 30 50
0 0 3 3
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 11& 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 1
0 0 4 4
0 0 1 1 1
0 0 0 0
STATE PLANNED AND PROGRAMMED IMPROVEMENTS
Most of the major roadways in and surrounding the City of Winter Springs are maintained by FDOT.
On these FDOT maintained roadways there are multiple planned /programmed improvements within
the City, as shown on Table 6. Planned improvements are those in the fiscally feasible Long Range
Transportation Plan (LRTP), but do not have specific funding sources identified. Programmed
improvements are those in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), indicating that funding
has been identified for the project.
Section 2. Transportation Analysis 1 10
Table 6. State Planned and Programmed Improvements
Improvement
SR 434 @ Winding Hollow Blvd
EB Right Turn Lane
Programmed
2018
SR 434: SR 417 to Mitchell
Widen to 4 Lanes
Planned
2025
Hammock Rd
SR 419: SR 434 to Edgemon Ave
Widen to 4 Lanes
Planned
2020
SR 419: Edgemon Ave to US 17/92
Widen to 4 Lanes
Planned
2025
SR 434: Edgemon Ave to US 17/92
Widen to 6 Lanes
Planned
2040
EXISTING ROADWAY ANALYSIS
The existing roadway volumes (Annual Average Daily Traffic, or AADT) for the major roadways
within and surrounding the City of Winter Springs were collected from the 2006 -2015 Seminole
County Historical Count spreadsheet The AADT was compared to the generalized level of service
volume standards from the 2013 Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Quality /Level of
Service (QLOS) Handbook. Based on the existing conditions, the roadways in Winter Springs operate
at overall acceptable level of service, except for the segment of SR 434 from SR 417 to Hammock Lane,
which is over capacity by almost 20% as a two -lane roadway. However, the widening of SR 434 east
of SR 417 is included in the financially feasible LRTP.
FUTURE ROADWAY ANALYSIS
The regional model was run with just the existing development and with the City's projected
development to determine the roadway network needs for the future. Assuming the improvements
shown in both the TIP and LRTP, all segments are projected to operate at an appropriate level of
service, except for the segment of SR 434 from SR 419 to Tuskawilla Road in the no -build condition
(Table 8). When project trips are added to the network, an additional segment of SR 434 (from
Vistawilla Drive to SR 417) exceeds the service volume standard (Table 9). However, in both
instances, the deficiencies are on state routes, and thus not the responsibility of the City of Winter
Springs.
The difference between the no -build and projected development volumes on the roadways within
Winter Springs was used to determine what percentage of traffic on the roadway is due to the
projected development, and thus eligible for Impact Fee calculations. This comparison is shown in
Table 10 and is used in Section 3 of this Report to allocate project costs in the calculation of average
trip costs for the impact fees.
Section 2. Transportation Analysis 1 11
Table 7. Exis
Level of Service
Table 8. No -Build Roa
Level of Service
US 17 -92 to Belle Ave
4
E
E
33,709
39,800
0.85 C
Winter Park Dr to Edgemon Ave
Belle Ave to SR 419
4
31,752
E
24,618
39,800
0.62 C
4
SR 419 to Tuskawilla Rd
4
39,800
E
34,013
39,800
0.85 C
SR 434
Tuskawilla Rd to Spring Ave
4
1.26 F
E
24,347
39,800
0.61 C
47,530
Spring Ave to SR 417
4
E
24,943
39,800
0.63 C
39,800
SR 417 to Hammock Lane
2
Tuscora Dr to Vistawilla Dr
E
21,051
17,700
1.19 F
0.89 C
US 17 -92 to Edgemon Ave
2
4
E
15,403
17,700
0.87 C
SR 419
Edgemon Ave to SR 434
2
E
E
17,236
17,700
0.97 D
US 17 -92 to Edgemon Ave
E Lake Dr to Dyson Dr
4
32,536
E
26,180
35,820
0.73 C
Tuskawilla
Dyson Dr to Winter Springs Blvd
4
39,800
E
21,925
35,820
0.61 C
Road
Winter Springs Blvd to Trotwood Blvd
4
0.36 C
E
20,572
35,820
0.57 C
12,544
Trotwood Blvd to SR 434
4
Rd
E
&420,099
35,820
0.56 C
US 17/92
SR 434 to CR 427/SR 419
6
SR 434 to Orange Ave
E
31,535
59,900
0.53 C
Table 8. No -Build Roa
Level of Service
Section 2. Transportation Analysis 1 12
US 17 -92 to Winter Park Dr
6
E
39,102
59,900
0.65 C
Winter Park Dr to Edgemon Ave
6
E
31,752
59,900
0.53 C
Edgemon Ave to SR 419
4
E
25,970
39,800
0.65 C
SR 419 to Orange Ave
4
E
50,078
39,800
1.26 F
SR 434
Orange Ave to Tuskawilla Rd
4
E
47,530
39,800
1.19 F
Tuskawilla Rd to Tuscora Dr
4
E
35,084
39,800
0.88 C
Tuscora Dr to Vistawilla Dr
4
E
35,378
39,800
0.89 C
Vistawilla Dr to SR 417
4
E
36,652
39,800
0.92 C
SR 417 to Hammock Lane
4
E
21,168
39,800
0.53 C
US 17 -92 to Edgemon Ave
4
E
32,536
39,800
0.82 C
SR 419
Edgemon Ave to SR 434
4
E
30,674
39,800
0.77 C
E Lake Dr to Winter Springs Blvd
4
E
13,034
35,820
0.36 C
Tuskawilla
Winter Springs Blvd to SR 434
4
E
12,544
35,820
0.35 C
Rd
SR 434 to Orange Ave
2
E
882
14,040
0.06 C
US 17/92
SR 434 to Florida Ave
6
E
46,746
59,900
0.78 C
Florida Ave to CR 427/SR 419
6
E
42,336
59,900
0.71 C
Section 2. Transportation Analysis 1 12
Table 9. Road
Table 10. C
Volume-
US 17 -92 to Winter Park Dr
6
E
40,082
59,900
0.67
C
33,800
Winter Park Dr to Edgemon Ave
6
E
33,124
59,900
0.55
C
SR 419 to Orange Ave
Edgemon Ave to SR 419
4
E
27,538
39,800
0.69
C
7%
SR 419 to Orange Ave
4
E
53,704
39,800
1.35
Tuscora Dr to Vistawilla Dr
SR 434
Orange Ave to Tuskawilla Rd
4
E
51,352
39,800
1.29
F
Tuskawilla Rd to Tuscora Dr
4
E
39,298
39,800
0.99
M
35,000
Tuscora Dr to Vistawilla Dr
4
E
33,320
39,800
0.84
C
Edgemon Ave to SR 434
Vistawilla Dr to SR 417
4
E
40,866 10 39,800
1.03
F
15,500
SR 417 to Hammock Lane
4
E
24,990
39,800
0.63
C
SR 434 to Orange Ave
US 17 -92 to Edgemon Ave
4
E
34,300 ME 39,800
0.86
C
SR 419
Edgemon Ave to SR 434
4
E
32,438
39,800
0.82
C
US 17 to Seven Oaks Blvd
E Lake Dr to Winter Springs Blvd
MEL 4
E
15,190
35,820
0.42
C
Tuskawilla
Winter Springs Blvd to SR 434
4
E
14,700
35,820
0.41
C
Rd
SR 434 to Orange Ave
-E 2
E
4,802
14,040
0.34
C
US 17/92
SR 434 to Florida Ave
6
E
46,648
59,900
0.78
C
9
Florida Ave to CR 427/SR 419
-E 6
E
%6 41,944
L59,900
0.70
C
Table 10. C
Volume-
Section 2. Transportation Analysis 1 13
US 17 -92 to Winter Park Dr
39,900
40,900
2%
Winter Park Dr to Edgemon Ave
32,400
33,800
4%
Edgemon Ave to SR 419
26,500
28,100
6%
SR 419 to Orange Ave
51,100
54,800
7%
SR 434
Orange Ave to Tuskawilla Rd
48,500
52,400
7%
Tuskawilla Rd to Tuscora Dr
35,800
40,100
11%
Tuscora Dr to Vistawilla Dr
36,100
34,000
-6%
Vistawilla Dr to SR 417
37,400
41,700
10%
SR 417 to Hammock Lane
21,600
25,500
15%
US 17 -92 to Edgemon Ave
33,200
35,000
5%
SR 419
Edgemon Ave to SR 434
31,300
33,100
5%
E Lake Dr to Winter Springs Blvd
13,300
15,500
14%
Tuskawilla Rd
Winter Springs Blvd to SR 434
12,800
15,000
15%
SR 434 to Orange Ave
900
4,900
82%
Winter Springs Blvd
Tuskawilla Rd to SR 426
4,700
5,300
11%
Edgemon Ave
SR 434 to SR 419
2,900
2,900
0%
US 17 to Seven Oaks Blvd
960
1,255
24%
Florida Ave
Seven Oaks Blvd to SR 434
45
100
55%
Orange Avenue
SR 434 to Tuskawilla Rd
0
35
100%
West Extension
830
1,525
46%
Michael Blake Blvd
South Extension
250
2,915
91%
East Extension
0
9
100%
East -West Connector
SR 434 to SR 434
95
6,850
99%
Section 2. Transportation Analysis 1 13
TRIP GENERATION
The projected development was provided by the City of Winter Springs by TAZ and land use, as
shown in Table 11. The trip generation for the projected development was calculated using the
general land use codes from the ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 91h Edition, as shown in Table 12.
Table 11. Proiected Development by TAZ
96
155
4,500
170,000
97
_
28,400
1 37,000
98
6.65
3,000
15,000
99
54111111� 134
1,492.05 KSF
77,200
109
8,229
Commercial
3,900 9,000
110
mam��
0.5
18,336
111
26
16,660
17,784
112
84
36,390
100,000
113
30 279
150,000
28,000
114
98 360
1,130,000
41,000
115
379
201,000
116
8,100
77,207
117
100,000
6,000
138
10 i
140
9
142
1 -1
15,000
99,756
Table 12. Proiected Development Trip Generation
Single Family
210
726 DU
9.52
0.5
3,456
Multi- Family
220
773 DU
6.65
0.5
2,570
Office
710
1,492.05 KSF
11.03
0.5
8,229
Commercial
820
858.847 KSF
42.70
0.5
18,336
Industrial
110
24 KSF
6.97
0.5
84
Section 2. Transportation Analysis 1 14
SECTION 3. CITY ROAD IMPROVEMENT
PROJECTS AND TRIP RATE ANALYSIS
GENERAL
Road improvements have been identified by the City and reviewed by the RFC Team and are
anticipated to meet the needs of all future growth identified in the City's development projections,
within the current City limits. The road improvements have been designed to not only develop new
roads but also to expand existing roads in order to facilitate traffic flow. Each project was reviewed
and the costs were allocated between future and existing development Project costs allocated to
future growth are identified for impact fee funding, while the portion allocated to the existing
population are funded through other sources of revenue. This section provides a description of the
projects, the anticipated project costs and the allocation to existing and future users of the roadway
system.
CITY ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
The table below provides a short description, cost estimate and the percent allocated to future
development for each of the road improvement projects. Certain projects have been shown on the
table below but not allocated to future development due to anticipated funding from other sources
such as developer funding or the lack of current growth projections driving the project For example,
Project 1 - Florida Avenue Extension will be a necessary project for any future development on the
former Winter Springs Golf Course parcel. The development plans and timing for this parcel are
currently unknown and therefore this project has been excluded from the impact fee analysis.
Section 3. Road Improvements 1 15
Table 13. Ci
and Allocations
A
Florida Ave from US 17 -92 to Lake Lucerne Circle (New 2-
$400,000
0%
$0
lane roadway)
B
SR 434 /Winding Hollow Blvd Intersection Improvements
200,000
0%
0
(New eastbound right -turn lane)
C
Central Winds Park Connector (New 2 -lane divided
1,760,000
0%
0
roadways)
D
GID East -West Roadway Connector (New 2 -lane roadway)
1,900,000
0%
0
E
SR 434 /GID Intersection Improvements (Signalization
350,000
0%
0
and turn lanes at Integra 360 Entrances)
1
Florida Ave Extension (New 2 -lane roadway)
3,500,000
0%
0
2
Orange Ave Extension (New 2 -lane roadway)
2,100,000
95%
1,995,000
3
Michael Blake Blvd East Ext. (Improved 2 -lane roadway)
950,000
75%
712,500
4
Michael Blake Blvd South Ext. (New 2 -lane roadway)
725,000
90%
652,500
5
Michael Blake Blvd West Ext. (New 2 -lane roadway)
975,000
45%
438,750
6
GID East -West Roadway (New 2 -lane roadway)
2,300,000
95%
2,185,000
7
North Vistawilla Drive Ext. (New 2 -lane roadway)
1,425,000
95%
1,353,750
8
SR 434 /Central Winds Drive Intersection Improvements
200,000
5%
10,000
(New westbound right -turn lane)
9
SR 434 /City Hall Intersection Improvements (New
200,000
5%
10,000
westbound right -turn lane)
10
SR 434 /Michael Blake Blvd Intersection Improvements
350,000
10%
35,000
(Signalization and turn lanes)
11
SR 434 /Tuscora Drive Intersection Improvements (New
200,000
10%
20,000
eastbound right -turn lane)
12
SR 434 / Vistawilla Drive Intersection Improvements
500,000
10%
50,000
(Signal Modification & turn lanes)
I 13
SR 434 Intersection Improvements (8 locations, New
1,600,000
10%
160,000
Turn Lanes)
Ik
+ E-,635,M�
$7,622,500
In addition to the project descriptions and cost estimates listed above, the figure below provides a
visual representation of the location of each project. Certain projects (labelled A - E) have funding
sources identified ranging from developer funded projects to CRA projects and have been excluded
from impact fee recovery amounts.
Section 3. Road Improvements 1 16
Fieure 3. Roadwav Improvements Ma
92
17
a17
2
41 C
1 an B
43 8
43
5� �3 D i 7
92
17 4. 1011 E 1
3 win=e
426
Serninola Iv
419,-
poi
a�
42
C
3 Legend
Red Bu Lake R New Development
The percentage of each project allocated to future development was derived from Table 10, which
illustrates a scenario of how these new roads and expansions will be utilized by existing and future
development Certain roads planned primarily to handle new residential developments have been
largely allocated to future growth based on the CUATS model forecast of traffic patterns.
AVERAGE COST PER TRIP CALCULATION
A key element of the impact fee analysis is to calculate the average cost per trip. This calculation
involves dividing the impact fee eligible projects by the new one way trips generated by new growth.
Impact fee eligible project costs are reduced by available impact fee funds to derive the average cost
per trip as shown on Table 14 below:
Table 14. Average Cost per Trip
Impact Fee Identified Project Costs [1] $7,622,500
Less: Impact Fee Funds Available ._ 532,000
Total Costs for Impact Fees $7,090,500
New 1 -Way Trips [2] =,671 Average Cost per Trip
1. Obtained from Table 13.
2. Obtained from Table 12.
Section 3. Road Improvements 1 17
The next section will further discuss how this average cost per trip is translated into an impact fee
by land use in order to recovery costs equitable among various developments.
Credit Considerations
Funding for road improvement projects can come from many different sources including
transportation impact fees, infrastructure funds, gas tax funds, ad valorem revenues, and non -ad
valorem revenues. For the purposes of this study it has been assumed that the City will continue the
past practice of not using alternate funding sources for the expansion portion of road projects.
Section 3. Road Improvements 1 18
SECTION 4. LAND USES AND IMPACT FEE
CALCULATIONS
GENERAL
The traffic impact analysis discussed in Section 2 and the average cost per trip calculated in Section
3 are utilized in this section to determine the appropriate impact fee levels. This section also provides
the equivalent traffic demands by land use based on the 3rd Edition ITE Manual, 9th Edition ITE
Handbook and other sources. The ITE Manual provides for trip generation rates and other relevant
factors by Land Use Code ( "LUC "). In general, each development will be measured on a number of
units, which are either dwelling units ( "DUs ") or thousand square feet of leasable area or floor area,
as specified by ITE.
It should be noted that in addition to the transportation impact fee paid to the City, new development
will also be required to pay additional transportation impact fees to Seminole County.
IMPACT FEE METHODOLOGY
The RFC team and City staff have conducted an extensive review of the various land uses on the
impact fee proposed schedule. These land uses are relevant to the development within the City and
provide a sufficient variety of land uses so that certain low or high volume trip generating land uses
are charged appropriately. The following table summarizes the existing and proposed land use codes
and descriptions.
Table 15. Existing and Proposed Land Uses
Existing
Residential
210. Single - Family Det/Att
210. Single Family
220. Low -rise Apartments
220. Multi- Family
230. Low -rise Res. Condo
240. Mobile Home Park
240. Mobile Home Park
253. Congregate Care
253. Congregate Care
254. Assisted Living Facility
Office
710. General Office Building
710. General Office Building
720. Medical /Dental Off Bld
720. Medical /Dental Office Building
750. Office Park
770. Business Park
Institutional
536. Private School
560. Church
560. Church
565. Day Care Center
565. Day Care Center
591. Lodge /Fraternal Org.
Section 4. Transportation Impact Fee Calculations 1 19
0
Medical
610. Hospital
620. Nursing Home
630. Clinic
Commercial
812. Bldg Mat /Lumber Store
815. Discount Store
816. Hardware /Paint Store
817. Nursery /Garden Store
820. Shopping Center
820. Retail:
Retail (0- 25KSF)
Retail (25- 50KSF)
Retail (50- 100KSF)
Retail (100- 200KSF)
Retail ( >200KSF)
826. Specialty Retail Center
848. Tire Store
849. Tire Superstore
850. Supermarket
851. Con. Str (24hr) w/o gas
853. Convenience w /gas
862. Home improvement store
890. Furniture store
931. Quality Restaurant
932. High Turnover Sit -d.Res
933. Fast Food w/o Drivethru
934. Fast Food w /Drivethru
942. Auto Care Center
945. Svc Sta w /Convenience
947. Self Svc Car Wash
Services
911. Walk -in Bank
912. Drive -in Bank
Recreational
430. Golf Course
444. Movie Theater
492. Racquet Club
Lodging
320. Motel
610. Hospital
620. Nursing Home
630. Clinic
815. Discount Store
816. Hardware /Paint Store
817. Nursery /Garden Store
820. Shopping Center /Retail:
Retail ( <50 KSF)
Retail (50 -100 KSF)
Retail ( >100 KSF)
848. Tire Store
850. Supermarket M
851. Con. Str (24hr) w/o gas
853. Convenience Market w/ Gas Pumps
862. Home Improvement Superstore
890. Furniture store
931. Quality Restaurant
932. High Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant
933. Fast Food Restaurant w /out Drive -thru
934. Fast Food Restaurant w /Drive -thru
942. Auto Care Center
945. Gas Service Station w/ Convenience
947. Self Service Car Wash
911. Walk in Bank
912. Drive In Bank
430. Golf Course
444. Movie Theater
492. Health/Fitness Club
310. Hotel
Section 4. Transportation Impact Fee Calculations 1 20
Industrial
110. General light industrial 110. General Light Industrial
130. Industrial Park
150. Warehousing 150. Warehousing
151. Mini - warehouse 151. Mini - warehouse
Additional land use descriptions have been included at the end of this report, in Exhibit 2, for certain
land uses that are similar in nature. For example, ITE describes the different attributes for a Nursing
Home facility versus a Congregate Care facility. Each of these facilities can be present on a property,
however each building would be assessed impact fees based on the primary use of that specific
building.
Once the appropriate land uses have been determined, the methodology then takes into
consideration a few factors to weigh the traffic impact for one unit of each type of development:
• Trip Rate: The trip rate factors are obtained from the ITE Manual, 9th Edition. These factors
are used in a variety of ways throughout the industry and are commonly relied upon in
transportation analysis and impact fee studies. In order to assess new development
appropriately, the trip rate is converted to a one -way trip rate.
• Percentage of New Trips: The percentage of new trips factor is derived from the ITE Trip
Generation Manual, 3rd Edition. The purpose of including this factor is to recognize that
certain high volume trip generating land uses are not necessarily creating new demand on
the roads, but are being utilized as pass -by stops. For example, a new coffee shop with a
drive - through will cause many consumers to make a quick stop on their normal route to work
but will also inspire a few consumers to take a new route to work occasionally to stop for
coffee.
• Trip Length Ratio: The third and final factor that has been incorporated into the impact fee
formula allows for weighing average trip lengths for certain land uses. The purpose of this
factor is to recognize that certain land uses will generate trips utilizing a lesser distance on
City roads than other land uses. The trip length ratio data has been derived from the City's
existing impact fee ordinance.
After identifying the appropriate trip rate, percentage of new trips, and the trip length ratio for each
land use, these factors are multiplied together to calculate the Equivalent Trip Factor. The Equivalent
Trip Factor calculation is provided on Exhibit 1, and is applied to the Average Cost per Trip (from
Table 14) of $217.00 to generate the updated impact fee schedule shown on the next page.
IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE
Using the methodology discussed in this section, and detailed in Exhibit 1, along with the average
cost per new trip as discussed in Section 3 the following table provides the updated impact fee
schedule:
Section 4. Transportation Impact Fee Calculations 1 21
Table 16. Undated Impact Fee Schedule
Residential
210
Single Family
DU
$1,342.00
220
Multi- Family
DU
$937.00
240
Mobile Home Park
DU
$703.00
254
Assisted Living Facility
Bed
$375.00
253
Congregate Care
DU
$284.00
Office
710
General Office Building
1,000 SF GFA
$1,555.00
720
Medical/Dental Office Building
1,000 SF GFA
$5,096.00
Institutional
560
Church
1,000 SF GFA
$1,186.00
565
Day Care Center
1,000 SF GFA
$3,214.00
536
Private School
Student
$2,317.00
Medical
610
Hospital
1,000 SF GFA
$1,864.00
620
Nursing Home
Bed
$386.00
630
Clinic
1,000 SF GFA
$4,436.00
Commercial
815
Discount Store
1,000 SF GFA
$3,347.00
816
Hardware /Paint Store
1,000 SF GFA
$2,470.00
817
Nursery /Garden Store
1,000 SF GFA
$3,827.00
Shopping Center /Retail:
820
0 - 50,000 sf
1,000 SF GLA
$4,338.00
820
50,001 sf - 100,000 sf
1,000 SF GLA
$3,404.00
820
100,001 sf and greater
1,000 SF GLA
$2,140.00
848
Tire Store
1,000 SF GFA
$1,384.00
850
Supermarket
1,000 SF GFA
$3,549.00
851
Con. Sir (24hr) w/o gas
1,000 SF GFA
$7,847.00
862
Home Improvement Superstore
1,000 SF GFA
$1,354.00
890
Furniture store
1,000 SF GFA
$335.00
931
Quality Restaurant
1,000 SF GFA
$7,104.00
932
High Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant
1,000 SF GFA
$5,504.00
933
Fast Food Restaurant w /out Drive -thru
1,000 SF GFA
$27,733.00
934
Fast Food Restaurant w /Drive -thru
1,000 SF GFA
$19,216.00
942
Auto Care Center
1,000 SF GFA
$688.00
853
Convenience Market w/ Gas Pumps
1,000 SF GFA
$5,449.00
945
Gas Service Station w/ Convenience
Fueling Position
$1,342.00
947
Self Service Car Wash
Stall
$4,007.00
Services
911
Walk in Bank
1,000 SF GFA
$2,278.00
912
Drive in Bank
1,000 SF GFA
$4,565.00
Section 4. Transportation Impact Fee Calculations 1 22
Recreational
430
Golf Course
Acre
$656.00
444
Movie Theater
Screen
$28,033.00
492
Health/Fitness Club
1,000 SF GFA
$6,083.00
Lodging
310
Hotel
Room
$1,329.00
Industrial
110
General Light Industrial
1,000 SF GFA
$983.00
150
Warehousing
1,000 SF GFA
$502.00
151 M
Mini - warehouse
1,000 SF GFA
$352.00
Note: Impact Fees rounded
down to nearest dollar.
Section 4. Transportation Impact Fee Calculations 1 23
LIST OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit 1. Equivalent Trip Factor by Land Use
Exhibit 2. ITE Land Use Descriptions
List of Exhibits 1 24
Exhibit 1. Equivalent Trip Factor by Land Use
Residential
Single Family
DU
210
9.52
1.30
100.00 %lm
6.19
Multi- Family
DU
220
6.65
1.30
100.00%
4.32
Mobile Home Park
DU
240
4.99
1.30
100.A� 3.24
Congregate Care
DU
253
2.02
1.30
100.00%
1.31
Assisted Living Facility
Bed
254
2.66
1.30
100 =�
1.73
Office
General Office Building
1,000 SF GFA
710
11.03
1.30
100.00 % A
7.17
Medical/Dental Office Building
1,000 SF GFA
720
36.13
1.30
100.00%
23.48
Institutional
'FF
Private School
Student
536
16.43
1.30
100.00%
10.68
Church
1,000 SF GFA
560
9.11
1.20
100.00%
5.47
Day Care Center
1,000 SF GFA
565
74.06
0.40
100.00%
14.81
Medical
A
ii
Hospital
1,000 SF GFA
610
13.22
1.30
100.00%
8.59
Nursing Home
Bed
620
2.74
1.78
Clinic
1,000 SF GFA
630
31.45
1.30
100.00%
20.44
Commercial
�W
11W
Discount Store
1,000 SF GFA
815
57.24
0.70
77.00%
15.43
Hardware/Paint Store
1,000 SF GFA
816
51.29
0.60
74.00 %IM
11.39
Nursery /Garden Store
1,000 SF GFA
817
68.10
0.70
74.00%
17.64
Shopping Center /Retail:
%or
'm
0 - 50,000 sf
1,000 SF GLA
820
86.56
0.70
66.00%
19.99
50,001 - 100,000 sf
1,000 SF GLA
820
67.91
0.70
66.00 ° /Va
15.69
100,001 sf and greater
1,000 SF GLA
820
42.70
0.70
66.00%
9.86
Tire Store
1,000 SF GFA
848
24.87
0.90
57.00 -,J�
6.38
Supermarket
1,000 SF GFA
850
102.24
0.50
64.00%
16.36
Con. Str (24hr) w/o gas
1,000 SF GFA
851
737.99
0.20
49.00 ° /J
36.16
Home Improvement Superstore
1,000 SF GFA
862
30.74
0.70
58.00%
6.24
Exhibit 1. Equivalent Trip Factor by Land Use
Furniture store
1,000 SF GFA
890
5.06
1.30
47.00°AMbE
1.55
Quality Restaurant
1,000 SF GFA
931
89.95
1.30
56.00%
32.74
High Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant
1,000 SF GFA
932
127.15
0.70
57.00° ,Mlh.
25.37
Fast Food Restaurant w /out Drive -thrn
1,000 SF GFA
933
716.00
0.70
51.00%
127.81
Fast Food Restaurant w/Drive -thrn
1,000 SF GFA
934
496.12
0.70
51.00AM
88.56
Auto Care Center
1,000 SF GFA
942
8.57
1.30
57.00%
3.18
Convenience Market w/ Gas Pumps [2]
1,000 SF GFA
853
1,141.59
0.20
22.00 %1�
25.11
Gas Service Station w/ Convenience
Fueling Position
945
162.78
0.20
38.00%
6.19
Self Service Car Wash
Stall
947
108.00
0.60
57.00 %1_
18.47
Services
Walk in Bank
Drive In Bank
Recreational
Golf Course
Movie Theater
Health /Fitness Club
Lodging
Hotel
Industrial
General Light Industrial
Warehousing
Mini - warehouse
Footnotes:
[1] Derived from previous impact fee study.
[2] From 2012 FDOT Trip Generation study.
1,000 SF GFA
911
73.95
0.40
71.00° 10.50
1,000 SF GFA
912
148.15
0.40
71.00% 21.04
�F
'-
Acre
430
5.04
1.20
100.00% 3.02
Screen
444
215.31
100.00 %1= 129.19
1,000 SF GFA
492
46.72
1.20
100.00% 28.03
I
Room
310
8.17
1.50
100.00% 6.13
1�
1,000 SF GFA
110
6.97
1.30
100.00% 4.53
1,000 SF GFA
150
3.56
1.30
100.000NIM 2.31
1,000 SF GFA
151
2.50
1.30
100.00% 1.63
,_
,_
Exhibit 2. ITE Land Use Descriptions
Medical/
A medical dental office building is a facility that provides diagnoses and outpatient
Dental Office
care on a routine basis but is unable to provide prolonged in -house medical and
(LUC 720)
surgical care. One or more private physicians or dentists generally operate this type
LUC 853
of facility.
Gasoline /Service
A clinic that is any facility that provides limited diagnostic and outpatient care but is
Day Care Center
unable to provide prolonged in house medical and surgical care. Clinics commonly
Clinic
have lab facilities, supporting pharmacies and a wide range of services (compares to
(LUC 630)
the medical office, which may only have specialized or individual physicians).
(LUC 945)
Hospital (Land Use 610) and medical - dental office building (Land Use 720) are
related uses.
Convenience
Hotels are places of lodging that provide sleeping accommodations and supporting
Private School
facilities such as restaurants, cocktail lounges, meeting and banquet rooms or
Hotel (LUC 310)
convention facilities, limited recreational facilities (pool, fitness room) and /or retail
LUC 853
and service shops. Some of the sites included in this land use category are actually
Gasoline /Service
large motels providing the hotel facilities noted above.
Day Care Center
Motels are places of lodging that provide sleeping accommodations and often a
Motel (LUC 320)
restaurant. Motels generally offer free on -site parking and provide little or no
Market
meeting space and few (if any) supporting facilities. Exterior corridors accessing
(LUC 945)
rooms - immediately adjacent to a parking lot - commonly characterize motels.
Convenience
Private schools in this land use category primarily serve students attending
Private School
kindergarten through the 12th grade but may also include those beginning with pre -
(K-12) (LUC 536)
k classes. These schools may also offer extended care and day care. Students may
LUC 853
travel a long distance to get to private schools.
Gasoline /Service
A day care center is a facility where care for pre - school age children is provided,
Day Care Center
normally during the daytime hours. Day care facilities generally include classrooms,
(LUC 565)
offices, eating areas, and playgrounds. Some centers also provide after - school care
Market
for school-age children.
Convenience
The convenience markets surveyed sell gasoline, convenience foods, newspapers,
Market w/ Gas
magazines, and often beer and wine. This land use includes convenience items with
Pumps
gasoline pumps where the primary business is the selling of convenience items, not
LUC 853
the fueling of motor vehicles.
Gasoline /Service
This land use includes gasoline /service station with convenience markets where the
Station with
Primary business is the fueling of motor vehicles. These service stations may also
Convenience
have ancillary facilities for servicing and repairing motor vehicles. Some commonly
Market
sold convenience items are newspapers, coffee, or other beverages and snack items
(LUC 945)
that are usually consumed in the car. These service stations are generally located at
intersections or interchanges. This land does not include stations with car washes.
Exhibit 2. ITE Land Use Descriptions
Congregate Care
Facility
(LUC 253)
Congregate care facilities are independent living developments that provide
centralized amenities such as dining, housekeeping, transportation, and organized
social /recreational activities. Limited medical services (such as nursing and dental)
may or may not be provided. The resident may contract additional medical services
or personal assistance.
Assisted living complexes are residential settings that provide either routine general
Quality
protective oversight or assistance with activities necessary for independent living to
Restaurant
mentally or physically limited persons. They commonly have separate living
Assisted Living
quarters for residents, and services include dining, housekeeping, social and physical
Facility
activities, medication administration, and transportation. Alzheimer's and ALS care
(LUC 254)
are commonly offered by these facilities, though the living quarters for these patients
may be located separately from the other residents. Assisted care commonly bridges
the gap between independent living and nursing homes. In some areas of the
High- Turnover
country, assisted living residences
(Sit -Down)
A nursing home is any facility whose primary function is to provide care for persons
Restaurant
who are unable to care for themselves. Examples of such facilities include rest homes
Nursing Home
and chronic care and convalescent homes. Skilled nurses and nursing aides are
(LUC 620)
present 24 hours a day at these sites. Nursing homes are occupied by residents who
do little or no driving; traffic is primarily generated by employees, visitors, and
Fast -Food
deliveries.
This land consists of high quality, full service eating establishments with typical
duration of stay of at least one hour. Quality restaurants generally do not serve
Quality
breakfast some do not serve lunch; all serve dinner. This type of restaurant often
Restaurant
requests and sometimes requires reservations and is generally not part of a chain.
(LUC 931)
Patrons commonly wait to be seated, are served by a waiter /waitress, order from
menus and pay for meals after they eats. While some of the study sites have lounge
or bar facilities (serving alcoholic beverages), they are ancillary to the restaurant.
This land consists of sit down, full service eating establishments with typical
duration of stay of approximately one hour. This type of restaurant is usually
High- Turnover
moderately priced and frequently belongs to a restaurant chain. Generally, these
(Sit -Down)
restaurants serve lunch and dinner; they may also be open for breakfast and are
Restaurant
sometimes open 24 hours per day. These restaurants typically do not take
(LUC 932)
reservations. Patrons commonly wait to be seated, are served by a waiter /waitress,
order from menus and pay for their meal after they eat. Some facilities contained
within this land use may also contain a bar area for serving food and alcoholic drinks.
Fast -Food
This land use includes fast -food restaurants without drive - through windows. This
Restaurant
type of restaurant is characterized by a large carry -out clientele, long hours of service
without Drive-
(some are open for breakfast, all are open for lunch and dinner, some are open late
Through Window
at night or 24 hours per day) and high turnover rates for eat -in customers. These
(LUC 933)
limited- service eating establishments do notprovide table service. Patrons generally
order at a cash register and pay before they eat.
Fast -Food
This category includes fast food restaurants with drive through windows. This type
Restaurant with
of restaurant is characterized by a large drive through clientele, long hours of service
Drive - Through
(some are open for breakfast, all are open for lunch and dinner, some are open late
ow
Window
at night or 24 hours per day) and high turnover rate for eat in customers. These
(LUC
limited service eating establishments do not provide table service. Non drive
through patrons generally order at a cash register and pay before they eat
EXHIBIT C
ORDINANCE NO. 2016 -10
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, SEMINOLE COUNTY,
FLORIDA; AMENDING THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
ROAD IMPACT FEE REGULATIONS AND SCHEDULE
SET FORTH IN THE CITY CODE; PROVIDING FOR THE
REPEAL OF PRIOR INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES AND
RESOLUTIONS, INCORPORATION INTO THE CODE,
SEVERABILITY, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City is granted the authority, under § 2(b), Art. VIII of the State
Constitution, to exercise any power for municipal purposes, except when expressly prohibited by
law, and expressly granted authority to adopt impact fees for funding the infrastructure
necessitated by new growth pursuant to the Florida Impact Fee Act set forth in Section 163.31801,
Florida Statutes; and
WHEREAS, the City of Winter Springs currently imposes transportation impact fees on
new development in accordance with Section 9 -386 -1 et. seq. of the City of Winter Springs Code;
and
WHEREAS, the City Commission desires to update the City's transportation impact fees
based on current local data and analysis; and
WHEREAS, for purposes updating the City's transportation impact fee, the City engaged
Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc. to prepare a written 2016 Transportation Impact Fee Study,
dated October 28, 2016 ("2016 Study "); and
WHEREAS, the City Commission has reviewed the 2016 Study and hereby adopts it in
its entirety as a basis for updating the City's transportation impact fee regulations and fee schedule;
and
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, hereby finds
this Ordinance to be in the best interests of the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of
Winter Springs.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER
SPRINGS HEREBY ORDAINS, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are hereby fully incorporated herein by
reference as legislative findings of the City Commission of Winter Springs.
Section 2. Code Amendment. The City of Winter Springs Code of Ordinances,
Chapter 9, Division 2, is hereby amended as follows (underlined type indicates additions and
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2016 -10
Page 1 of 30
stf:ikeot4 type indicates deletions):
DIVISION 2. - TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES
Sec. 9 -386. - Transportation impact fees.
Transportation impact fee provisions are set out in this division as sections 9 -386.1 through 9- 386.21.
Sec. 9- 386.1. - Short title, authority and applicability.
(a) This division shall be known and may be cited as the "City of Winter Springs Road Impact Fee
Ordinance der" or the "City of Winter Springs Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance ".
(b) The planning for new and expanded roads needed to serve new growth and development that
generate additional traffic and the implementation of these plans through the comprehensive planning
process are the responsibility of the city under Part II of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, Section
163.3161 et seq., Florida Statutes, and specifically Section 163.31801, Florida Statutes (Florida Impact
Fee Act ), as am°p ed by Ghapier 95 55 Law,; ^f Florida Chapter 166, Florida Statutes, various
laws relating to the power of the City of Winter Springs undertaking zoning, planning and
development activities, and is in the best interest of the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of
the city.
Sec. 9- 386.2. - Intent and purpose.
(a) This division is intended to be consistent with the principles for allocating a fair share of the cost of
new public facilities and infrastructure to new users as established by the Florida Supreme Court.
(b) The implementation of a regulatory program that requires new development to pay a "transportation
or road impact fee" that does not exceed a pro rata share of the reasonably anticipated expansion
costs of new municipal collector roads needed to serve new growth and development is the
responsibility of the city in order to carry out the traffic circulation element of its comprehensive plan,
as required under Section 163.3161 et seq., Florida Statutes, and is in the best interest of the health,
safety and welfare of the citizens of the City of Winter Springs.
(c) The purpose of this division is to enable the City of Winter Springs to allow growth and development
to proceed in compliance with the growth management plan, and Florida case and statutory law and
to regulate growth and development so as to require growth and development to share in the burdens
of growth by paying its pro rata share for the reasonably anticipated costs of needed municipal collector
roadway improvements.
(d) It is not the purpose of this division to collect fees from growth and development in excess of the cost
of the reasonably anticipated improvements to the municipal collector road network and needed to
serve the new growth development. It is specifically acknowledged that this division has approached
the problem of determining the road impact fee in a conservative and reasonable manner.
(e) The technical data, findings and conclusions herein are based on the Comprehensive Plan of the City
of Winter Springs and in part on the following studies and reports which are hereby adopted (by
reference):
(1) ITE Trip Generation Manual, ITE (7## 9th Edition);
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2016 -10
Page 2 of 30
(2) ITE Trip Generation Handbook (3,d Edition);
(2— 3) Orlando Urban Area Transportation Studies;
(4 4) Special Report 209, Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, 1985;
(4— 5) Generalized Daily Level of Service Maximum Volumes for Florida's Urban /Urbanized
(5000 +) Areas, FDOT 2002 2013;
(a 6) Cost per Lane Mile -City of Winter Springs Transportation Impact Fee Update, 2005;
(6 7 ) Existing Traffic Circulation Analysis, City of Winter Springs Study, September, 1989, Tipton
Associates Incorporated and Leftwich Consulting Engineers, Inc.;
(7— 8) Future Traffic Circulation Analysis, City of Winter Springs Study, December, 1991, Tipton
Associates, Inc. and Leftwich Consulting Engineers, Inc.
(g 9) Input Data for Seminole and Volusia Counties for Calculating Transportation Impact Fees
for Convenience Stores, August, 1989, Tipton Associates Incorporated.
(� 10) City of Winter Springs Transportation Study, August 1997; Supplement No. 1 December
1999; Supplement No. 2, February 2001; Supplement No. 3, February 2005.
(4-9 11) City of Winter Springs Transportation Impact Fee Update, September 1997; Update,
December 1999; Update, February 2005; update October 2016.
Sec. 9- 386.3. - Rules of construction.
For the purpose of administration and enforcement of this division, unless otherwise stated, the
following rules of construction shall apply:
(a) In case of any difference of meaning or implication between the text of this division and any
caption, illustration, summary table or illustrative table, the text shall control.
(b) The word "shall" is always mandatory and not discretionary; the word "may" is permissive.
(c) Words used in the present tense shall include the future, and words used in the singular number
shall include the plural and the plural the singular, unless the context clearly indicates the
contrary.
(d) The word "person" includes an individual, a corporation, a partnership, an incorporated
association, or any other similar entity.
(e) Unless the context clearly indicates the contrary, where a regulation involves two (2) or more
items, conditions, provisions, or events connected by the conjunction "and ", "or" or "either ... or,"
the conjunction shall be interpreted as follows:
(1) "And" indicates that all the connected terms, conditions, provisions or events shall apply.
(2) "Or" indicates that the connected items, conditions, provisions or events may apply singly or
in any combination.
(3) "Either ... or" indicates that the connected items, conditions, provisions or events shall apply
singly but not in combination.
(f) The word "includes" shall not limit a term to the specific example but is intended to extend its
meaning to all other instances or circumstances of like kind or character.
Sec. 9- 386.4. - Definitions.
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2016 -10
Page 3 of 30
For the purpose of this division, the following words and terms shall have the meaning ascribed thereto:
Access improvement: Road improvements necessary to provide safe and adequate ingress and
egress and for efficient traffic operations. Access improvements include but are not limited to the following:
(1) Right -of -way and easements;
(2) Left and right turn lanes;
(3) Acceleration and deceleration lanes;
(4) Traffic control devices, signage, and markings; and
(5) Drainage and utilities.
Accessory building, structure or use: A detached, subordinate building, structure or use, the use of
which is clearly incidental to and serves the principal building or use of the land and which is located on the
same lot as that of the principal building or use.
Applicant: Any person who applies for a building permit or certificate of occupancy.
Arterial roads: A classification of roads which primarily functions to accommodate the movement of
relatively large traffic volumes for relatively long distances at relatively high speeds. Land access, when
provided, is subservient to the movement function. This classification includes all roads which function
above the level of a major collector road.
Average trip length: The average length in miles of trips for each major land use category as
determined from the Orlando Urban Area Transportation Study and adjusted to reflect the travel
characteristics in the Orlando GMP Study Area, and special studies for particular land uses conducted by
registered professional engineers.
Building: Any permanent structure designed or built for the support, shelter or protection of persons,
animals, chattels or property of any kind.
Building permit: Any building or construction permit required under the Winter Springs Building Code
(chapter 6 of the City Code).
Capacity, capacity per lane: The maximum number of vehicles for a given time period which a typical
GaPaG
�n,�e,.,w�, la�n�e can safely and efficiently carry at a specified level of service. Per the purr°^° of this divis;°., the
'RAP At'w✓p, Af C ;ervivP"o2�. r
Capacity per lane mile: The product of the capacity per lane times one (1) lane mile. Per the p ur^° ^°
vC1- livres per day per �hrvugn urrc per mile - aazeveivrcservive o
Captured traffic: Diverted traffic plus passer -by- traffic.
Collector roads: Intermediate classifications of roads which provide both land access and movement
service for medium length trips. MajeF Gel!eGtA-.r reads #-i^ at elatively mederate speeds and ^ °^+
Development permit. Includes any building permit, conditional use, zoning approval, subdivision
approval, rezoning, development order, special exception, variance, or any other official action of local
government having the effect of permitting the development of land.
Development site: The property under consideration for development and under single ownership at
the time of application.
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2016 -10
Page 4 of 30
Diverted traffic: Traffic that is already on the road network, which is attracted by the new land
development and which may be transferred from another route.
Encumbered: Funds committed in a capital improvements program for a specified improvement on a
specified time schedule.
Expansion: Road and intersection capacity enhancements which include but are not limited to
extensions, widenings, intersection improvements, upgrading signalization and improving pavement
conditions.
External trip: Any trip which has either its origin or destination at the development site but not both.
Gross ,E ugdh4g floor area: For purposes of the division, gross bUiIdiRg floor area shall be defined in the
ITE Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition the }e} °I gress square f.,.,+°°°
Internal trip: Any trip which has both its origin and destination within the development site.
Land development: Any building, structure or other land use including the uses associated with the
building, structure or land.
Land development activity generating traffic: The carrying out of any land development, including but
not limited to building activity or the making of any material change in the use or appearance of any building,
structure or land that attracts or produces vehicular trip(s) over and above that produced by the existing
use of the land.
Land use: For the purpose of calculating the proper impact fee for each land use provided in the impact
fee schedules, the definitions provided for applicable land uses in the ITE Trip Generation Manual 9th Edition
Repert 5th CdlitieA (1991 shall apply.
A-f SP—P.4iGe "D" represeRtG high deRGity but stable flew. Speed ;-;Ad- freed-e.m. te mape--Uver are
Small ipr.re-ases 0A traffir. flew will geReFally Gause epeFatieRal pre-blems; at this level. Average trawpi
speeds a °hey t ferty (AMA A+ of free flew speed.
Local roads: A classification of roads which primarily functions to accommodate land access for
abutting property. Local roads may provide service for relatively small traffic volumes for relatively short
distances at relatively low speeds. Through traffic movement, when provided, is subservient to the land
access function. This classification includes all roads which function below the level of a municipal collector
road.
read netwe-Irk.- The iAte-Irr-,A-IAAe-r-,tiAg system ef read-so rGlassified- as; artelrial ;-;Ad- rGeller.te-Ir read—ro
QempreheRG've RI °n Adler! majer read Aefiyerk i nldleo•
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2016 -10
Page 5 of 30
Marginal cost: The additional cost incurred to provide a non - site - related improvement over and above
that which would be necessary to only provide the site - related improvement needed to serve the
development.
Non - site - related improvements: Road improvements, including rights -of -way, which are necessary to
provide safe and adequate travel service for the movement of vehicular traffic, and which are in excess of
or in addition to site - related improvements. Non - site - related improvements may include on -site or off -site
improvements to the municipal collector road network. The rear! im +fee f„r..,,1a , ,,., +ei.,e ;., this di„ isie.,
the m el nellen +err er! AefiyerL
Off -site improvements: Road improvements located outside of the boundaries of the development site
which are necessary to provide safe and adequate travel service for vehicular traffic.
On -site improvements: Road improvements located within the boundaries of the development site
which are necessary to provide safe and adequate travel service for vehicular traffic.
Passer -by- traffic: Traffic already on the road adjacent to the development site.
Road impact fee; impact assessment; fee: The fee required to be paid in accordance with this division.
Road improvements: Physical assets, constructed or purchased, that are necessary to provide safe
and adequate travel service for vehicular traffic. The acquisition, expansion or development of road
improvements includes transportation planning, preliminary engineering, engineering design studies, land
surveys, right -of -way acquisition, engineering, permitting, inspection and testing during construction, and
construction of all the necessary features for any road construction project including, but not limited to:
(1) Construction of the through lanes;
(2) Construction of turn lanes;
(3) Construction of bridges;
(4) Construction of drainage facilities in conjunction with roadway construction;
(5) Purchase and installation of traffic signalization, signage and markings;
(6) Construction of curbs, medians and shoulders; and
(7) Relocating utilities to accommodate roadway construction.
Road network: The interconnecting system of streets, roads, highways and other public ways open to
vehicular travel by the public generally and dedicated to the public use. The road network includes existing
public roads, planned extensions to existing public roads and planned new roads.
Site - related improvements: Road improvements, including rights -of -way, which are necessary to
provide safe and adequate travel service for the movement of vehicular traffic between the traffic - generating
land uses within the development, between the development and the 4;4 s existing road network and
access improvements. Site - related improvements may include on -site improvements to the road network.
The Fe-ad- iMPaGt fee fer.m.-HI-A this divisiep Apt ipteAded te assess Ap Amp, -At that repstifi ite
thp r,
GaIG61leted n n++e the terms of this division
Structure: Anything constructed, erected or placed, the use of which requires more or less permanent
location on or in the ground or attached to something having a permanent location on or in the ground.
Traffic - generating land uses; traffic - generating development: Any building, structure or other use of
the land that increases the generation of vehicular trips over and above that generated by the previous use.
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2016 -10
Page 6 of 30
Trip: The movement of vehicular travel from an origin to a destination. For the purposes of this division,
trip shall have the meaning which it had in commonly accepted traffic engineering practice and which is
substantially the same as that definition in the previous sentence.
Trip generation: The attraction or production of trips caused by the use or activity associated with a
given type or classification of land development.
Trip rate; trip generation rate: The average number of vehicle trips which can be attributed to a specific
type of land use activity per unit of development per day as documented in the ITE Trip Generation Manual,
9th Edition Re -peal 5- +h Edm ipp (1991
Unit of development: The standard incremental measure of land development activity for a specific
type of land use upon which the trip generation rate is based as documented in the ITE Trip Generation
Manual 9th Edition Reper+ 5th F=ditieR (1991
Vehicle miles of travel; lane miles: The sum of the product of the length of each roadway link times the
number of trips on each link as identified in the Winter Springs Future Year Network with Existing Traffic
Volumes Study attarhed- as Exhibit "" Roll WiRg thin diViGieR] and hereby adopted
Sec. 9- 386.5. - Limitations on issuance of building permits.
Any person who applies for the issuance of a building permit for land development activity which will
generate additional traffic shall be required to pay a road impact fee in the manner and amount set forth
herein.
Except as provided elsewhere in this division, no building permit for any land development activity
generating traffic requiring payment of a road impact fee pursuant to this division shall be issued unless
and until the road impact fee hereby required has been paid.
Except as provided elsewhere in the division, no person shall carry out any land development activity
generating traffic unless and until the road impact fee required by this division has been paid and a building
permit has been issued.
Sec. 9- 386.6. - Determination of road impact fees.
The road impact fee for any land development activity generating traffic shall be determined either by
using the fee rate schedule set forth in section 9 -386.7 or by using the independent method of calculation
set forth in section 9 -386.8 of this division. Also, any applicant may propose to enter into an impact
agreement with the city as set forth in section 9- 386.10 of this division in order to establish just and equitable
impact fees or their equivalent which are appropriate to the specific circumstances of the land development
activity generating traffic.
Sec. 9- 386.7. - Road impact fee rate schedule.
Any person may determine their road impact fee by using the following fee rate schedule_
Land Use
Description
Impact Unit
Impact Fee /Unit
Residential
210
Single Family
DU
$1,342.00
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2016 -10
Page 7 of 30
220
Multi Family
DU
$937.00
240
Mobile Home
DU
$703.00
254
Assisted Living Facility
Bed
$375.00
253
Congregate Care
DU
$284.00
Office
710
General Office Building
1,000 SF GFA
$1,555.00
720
Medical /Dental Office Building
1,000 SF GFA
$5,096.00
Institutional
560
Church
1,000 SF GFA
$1,186.00
565
Day Care Center
1,000 SF GFA
$3,214.00
536
Private School
Student
$2,317.00
Medical
610
Hospital
1,000 SF GFA
$1,864.00
620
Nursing Home
Bed
$386.00
630
Clinic
1,000 SF GFA
$4,436.00
Commercial
815
Discount Store
1,000 SF GFA
$3,347.00
816
Hardware /Paint Store
1,000 SF GFA
$2,470.00
817
Nursery /Garden Store
1,000 SF GFA
$3,827.00
Shopping
Center /R
etail:
820
0 - 50,000 sf
1,000 SF GLA
$4,338.00
820
50,001 sf - 100,000 sf
1,000 SF GLA
$3,404.00
820
100,001 sf and greater
1,000 SF GLA
$2,140.00
848
Tire Store
1,000 SF GFA
$1,384.00
850
Supermarket
1,000 SF GFA
$3,549.00
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2016 -10
Page 8 of 30
851
Con. Str (24hr) w/o gas
1,000 SF GFA
$7,847.00
862
Home Improvement Superstore
1,000 SF GFA
$1,354.00
890
Furniture store
1,000 SF GFA
$335.00
931
Quality Restaurant
1,000 SF GFA
$7,104.00
932
High Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant
1,000 SF GFA
$5,504.00
933
Fast Food Restaurant w /out Drive -thru
1,000 SF GFA
$27,733.00
934
Fast Food Restaurant w /Drive -thru
1,000 SF GFA
$19,216.00
942
Auto Care Center
1,000 SF GFA
$688.00
853
Convenience Market w/ Gas Pumps
1,000 SF GFA
$5,449.00
945
Gas Service Station w/ Convenience
Fueling Position
$1,342.00
947
Self Service Car Wash
Stall
$4,007.00
Services
911
Walk in Bank
1,000 SF GFA
$2,278.00
912
Drive in Bank
1,000 SF GFA
$4,565.00
pres A.ted- O.A. Exhibit "-R aipidd hereby adepted, and as R;ay be ame—Ad-e-d- fre.m. time te NM.e. The fee
rate schedule is presented for the convenience of the public and may be used in lieu of the independent
method of calculation set forth in section 9- 386.8. The fee rates have been calculated using the method of
calculation presented in section 9 -386.8 using recognized accepted trip generation rates based upon
acceptable national and local averages. For the convenience of the public the fee rates which are based
on trip generation have been converted to dollar amounts per unit of development, i.e., per dwelling unit,
per one thousand (1,000) square feet, per room, etc., depending upon the type or classification of land
development. The road impact fee is determined by the following provisions:
(1) Road Impact Fee Rate Schedule set forth in this section. See Exhibit "R"
(2) The total road impact fee for a specified type of land development activity is calculated by
multiplying the impact fee rate for the specified type of land development activity by the number
of units of development of the specified type of development activity.
(3) When a land development activity for which an application for a building permit has been made
includes two (2) or more buildings, structures or other land uses in any combination, including
two (2) or more uses within a building or structure, the total road impact fee assessment shall be
the sum of the products, as calculated above, for each and every building, structure or other use,
including each and every use within a building or structure, unless otherwise provided for in this
division.
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2016 -10
Page 9 of 30
(4) In the case of a change of use, redevelopment or modification of an existing building, structure or
other land development activity which requires the issuance of a building permit, the impact fee
shall be based upon the new increase in the impact fee for the new or proposed land development
activity as compared to the existing or last previous land use or activity.
(5) In the case of a demolition of an existing building or structure, the impact fee for future
redevelopment shall be based upon the net increase in the impact fee for the new or proposed
land development activity as compared to the land use or activity existing prior to demolition.
Credit for the der rg for use shall not be transferable to another location.
(6) In the case of a relocation of a building or structure, an impact fee shall be assessed to the
relocated building at its new location. Future redevelopment of the old location from which the
building was removed will receive a credit against the impact fee assessed equal to the impact
fee that would have been assessed against the relocated structure. Credits shall not be
transferable to the new location.
(7) In order to take advantage of subsection (4), (5) or (6) (above) and pay impact fees only for the
net increase in development activity, the applicant shall provide reasonably sufficient evidence
that the previous land use or activity was actually maintained on the site at any time during the
five -year period prior to the date of application for the new development approval. Such evidence
may include proof of utility records, records for the use sought to be shown, or other
documentation. Local business tax receipt issuance is not of itself substantial proof.
(8) In the event that an applicant for a building permit or the City of Winter Springs contends that the
land use for which the building permit is proposed is not within the categories listed in the impact
fee schedule set forth in this section,, ER�, or fits within a different category, then the city
manager, or his designee shall make a determination as to the appropriate land use designation
which is consistent with current practices to add land use categories to the fee rate schedule
following submission to the commission. In addition, either the city or the applicant can propose
actual studies or surveys in order to calculate the most appropriate fee rate. Such determination
may be appealed to the city commission by filing a written notice of appeal to the city manager or
desianee pursuant to section 9- 386.21.
Sec. 9- 386.8. - Independent impact fee calculation.
(a) In the event an applicant believes that the impact of this development on the municipal collector road
network will be less than that presumed in this division, the applicant may submit a proposed scope of
work for determining an independent fee calculation which shall comply with the methodology in the
latest Transportation Impact Fee Study adopted by the city commission to support this division.
roni. monts of s.lhseGtieR (d) of this semi,, Upon approval of the scope of work the applicant may
submit an independent fee calculation to the city manager or his designee, pursuant to the provisions
of this section. If the city manager, or his designee, finds that the data, information and assumptions
used by the applicant to calculate the independent impact fee satisfy the requirements of this section,
the independent impact fee shall be deemed the impact fee due and owing for the proposed
development. Since processing of independent impact fee calculations involves significant staff time,
applicants should submit their independent impact fee calculation at least sixty (60) days prior to the
date they will need a final determination of their impact fee. Alternatively, an applicant may pay the
impact fee normally required at the time of seeking a building permit, subject to possible
reimbursement of any excess paid according to the final independent impact fee determination. The
city's costs for administering and evaluating the independent impact fee, including but not limited to
the cost of independent consulting engineers, shall be borne by the applicant.
(b) In the event the city believes that the impact of the proposed development on the municipal collector
road network is greater than that presumed in this division, the city may accomplish an alternative
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2016 -10
Page 10 of 30
independent impact fee calculation to increase the transportation impact fee. This calculation shall
comply with the methodology in the latest Transportation Impact Fee Study adopted by the city
commission to support this division. rani dram°^}^ ^f 61119APAtieR
(d) this ^ ° ^} ^^ The city manager
or his designee shall notify the applicant in writing within five (5) workdays following the formal pre -
application meeting with city staff concerning this project. If the city chooses to accomplish an
independent impact fee calculation to increase the transportation impact fee for the proposed
development, the cost of accomplishing such independent impact fee calculation shall be borne by the
city. The city manager or his designee shall have final authority to determine the appropriate
transportation impact fee for the proposed project based upon an evaluation of the city's independent
impact fee calculation.
TvaTarrvrrorTrcw- rrmcv irz tFAVPl-
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2016 -10
Page 11 of 30
(d c) Data, information and assumption requirements: The independent impact fee calculations shall be
based on data, information or assumptions contained in this division or independent sources, provided
that:
(1) The independent source is an accepted standard source of transportation engineering or planning
data; or
(2) The independent source is based on actual studies or surveys conducted in the Orlando Urban
Area, or with the specific approval of the city manager, or his designee, in other urban areas and
carried out by a qualified registered engineer pursuant to an accepted methodology of
transportation planning or engineering.
(3) The methodology used for the independent impact fee calculations shall use the same
methodology as the latest Transportation Impact Fee Study adopted by the city commission.
(e d)Total road impact fee calculation: The total road impact fee assessment for a specified type of land
development activity generating traffic for which an application for a building permit has been made is
calculated by use of the following formula:
TIF = (IFR)(NUD)
FIR = Impact fee rate for specific land use as determined in section 9.386.8(c)(3).
NUD = Number of units in a development of the specified type of development activity.
(fie) When a land development activity for which an application for a building permit has been made
includes two (2) or more buildings, structures or other land uses in any combination, including two (2)
or more uses within a building or structure, the total road impact fee assessment shall be the sum of
the products, as calculated above, for each and every building, structure or other use, including each
and every use within a building or structure, unless otherwise provided for in this division.
(g f) In the case of a change of use, redevelopment, or modification of an existing building, structure or
other land development activity which requires the issuance of a building permit, the impact fee shall
be based upon the net increase in the impact fee for the new or proposed land development activity
as compared to the existing or last previous land use or activity.
(h) A determination by the city manager or his designee, that the independent calculation does not satisfy
the requirements of this section may be appealed to the city commission.
Sec. 9- 386.9. - Presumption of maximum impact.
Development is presumed to have the maximum impact on the municipal collector road network. The
proposed development activity for which an application for a building permit has been filed shall be
presumed to generate the maximum number of average daily vehicle trips, vehicle miles of travel and lane
miles of travel to be generated by the most appropriate land use category(s) as determined by the city
manager, or his designee.
Sec. 9- 386.10. - Impact agreement.
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2016 -10
Page 12 of 30
Any applicant may propose to enter into an impact agreement with the city designed to establish just
and equitable fees or their equivalent and standards of service needs appropriate to the circumstances of
the specific development proposed.
(1) Such an agreement may include, but shall not be limited to provisions which:
a. Modify the presumption of maximum impact set forth in section 9 -386.9 and provide an
impact fee which may differ from that set forth in section 9 -386.7 by specifying the nature of
the proposed development for purposes of computing actual trips, provided that the
agreement shall establish legally enforceable means for ensuring that the actual number of
trips generated will not exceed the estimated trips generated by the agreed upon
development.
b. Permit the construction of specific transportation improvements in lieu of or with a credit
against the road impact fee assessable.
Permit a schedule and method for payment of the fees in a manner appropriate to the
particular and unique circumstances of the proposed development in lieu of the requirements
for payment of the fees as set forth in section 9- 386.8, provided that security is posted
ensuring payment of the fees, in a form acceptable to the city, which security may be in the
form of a cash escrow deposit, beRc surety bond, or letter of credit .,°"gable „or+;f;^ ; +o „f
�. Rr.,y d-e fer a +ra Aas fer r,f .+ro4i +o a 6 p r e y d e d f e r e. r. A_., A- a
(2) Any agreement proposed by an applicant pursuant to this subsection shall be presented to and
approved by the city commission prior to the issuance of a building permit. Any such agreement
shall provide for execution by mortgagees, lienholders or contract purchasers in addition to the
land owner, and shall require the applicant to record such agreement in the official records of
Seminole County. The city commission shall approve such an agreement only if it finds that the
agreement will apportion the burden of expenditure for new facilities in a just and equitable
manner, consistent with the principles set forth in Florida Statutes and case law.
Sec. 9- 386.11. - Credits.
(a) An applicant shall be entitled to a credit against future road impact fees assessed pursuant to this
division for contributions, dedications or improvements required by the city or through agreements with
the city, as a condition of any development permit by the city, and said credit shall be in an amount
equal to:
(1) The cost of non - site - related improvements to the municipal collector road network (including on-
site and site - adjacent collectors to the extent such improvements are in excess of or in addition
to site - related improvements); or
(2) The contribution of land, money or services for non - site - related improvements to the municipal
collector road network (including on -site and site - adjacent municipal collectors to the extent such
improvements are in excess of or in addition to site - related improvements); or
(3) Non - site - related roadway improvements previously contributed, paid for or committed to by the
applicant or his predecessor in interest (including on -site and site - adjacent municipal collectors
to the extent such improvements are in excess of or in addition to site - related improvements).
a. No credit will be granted pursuant to this subsection unless the costs of the improvements
were paid for and the contributions made within the last five (5) years; and
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2016 -10
Page 13 of 30
(b) The credits shall be based on but not limited to the following criteria:
(1) The actual cost, or estimated cost of improvements based on recent bid sheet information of the
city or Seminole County_
qY
Appraiser's nff re
(c) Previous development permits wherein voluntary road impact fees were specified and paid shall be
binding as to any building permit already issued on land subject to the development permit. Road
improvements required by previous development permits shall not be given a credit unless they meet
the requirements of subsections (a) and (b) above.
(d) Any credit issued pursuant to this section shall run with the land on which the credit pertained and may
only be transferred by the holder of said credits to any successor in interest in the parcel of land to
which the credit pertained.
(e) Any agreement for the issuance of credits against any road impact fee assessed pursuant to this
division shall be included in an impact agreement as set forth in section 9- 386.10.
(f) Any petition for the issuance of credits against any road impact fee assessed pursuant to this division
shall be submitted to the city manager, or his designee, and must contain:
(1) A notarized sworn statement that the petitioner is the current owner of the property;
(2) A copy of any impact agreement, credit agreement, or other documentation on which the applicant
relies for the claim which may pertain to the issuance of such credits;
(3) A certified copy of the latest recorded deed; and
(4) Such other information which maybe reasonably necessary to ascertain current ownership of the
property and the current status of the agreements for credits.
Sec. 9- 386.12. - Vested rights.
(a) A developer or successor in interest of land which has received a development permit may petition the
city commission for a vested rights determination which would exempt the petitioner from the
provisions of this division. Such petition shall be evaluated by the city attorney and a recommendation
thereon submitted to the city commission based on the following criteria:
(1) There exists a valid, unexpired governmental act of authorizing the specific development for which
a determination is sought;
(2) Expenditures or obligations made or incurred in reliance upon the authorizing act that are
reasonably equivalent to the fees required by this division;
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2016 -10
Page 14 of 30
(3) That it would be inequitable to deny the petitioner the opportunity to complete the previously
approved development under the conditions of approval by requiring the developer to comply with
the requirements of this division. For the purposes of this subsection, the following factors shall
be considered in determining whether it would be inequitable to deny the petitioner the opportunity
to complete the previously approved development;
a. Whether the injury suffered by the petitioner outweighs the public cost of allowing the
development to go forward without payment of the fee required by this division;
b. Whether the expenses or obligations were made or incurred subsequent to January 22,
1990, after which date the adoption of this division was pending; and
c. Whether the operation of this division would create an onerous burden which would prevent
the petitioner from making a reasonable return on his investment.
(b) The city shall not permit the extension of a building permit beyond the initial time period for activation
without the applicant complying with the provisions of this division.
(c) If a previously approved development order or other binding agreement contained conditions regarding
traffic impacts, road impact fees and their designated uses, or off -site transportation improvements,
the developer or his successor may request a modification of such prior approvals in order to bring the
approval conditions into consistency with this division. Any such modification of prior approvals and
amendments to development orders so accomplished shall not be deemed a substantial deviation
under Chapter 380 of Florida Statutes. Any petition for such modification of prior approvals and
amendments to development orders under the provisions of this subsection must be filed with the city
manager within one (1) year of the effective date of this division.
(d) If a previously approved development order or other binding agreement provides for the mitigation of
the traffic impacts of said development and if the city manager, or his designee, determines that such
traffic impact mitigation measures are substantially consistent with the requirements of this division,
then the road impact fee payable for such development under this division shall be revised accordingly
to reflect the presumed traffic impact of said development. There shall be a presumption that the traffic
impact mitigation provisions of any development order approved more than five (5) years prior to the
adoption of this division are not substantially consistent with the requirements of this division. This
subsection shall not apply where a development order previously approved provides that at such time
as the city adopts transportation impact fee provision, thereafter the provisions and terms of the
adopted impact fee provision will apply to the development project. Any petition for such modification
of prior approvals and amendments to development orders under the provisions of this subsection
must be filed with the city manager within one (1) year of the effective date of this division.
Sec. 9- 386.13. - Site - related road improvements.
The road impact fee formula contained in this division is designed to calculate the costs inherent in the
construction on non - site - related improvements to the municipal collector road network and is not intended
to assess an amount that constitutes an approximation of the costs to construct site - related roadway
improvements. Therefore, if an assessment for sr the construction of site - related roadway improvements is
required as a condition of development approval, then to the extent permitted by law, said assessment or
construction requirements shall be considered as an addition to the assessment calculated pursuant to the
terms of this division.
Sec. 9- 386.14. - Exemptions.
The following shall be exempted from payment of the road impact fee:
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2016 -10
Page 15 of 30
(1) Those land development activities which have received a building permit prior to the effective
date of this division except as provided for in other sections of this division.
(2) Alteration or expansion of an existing dwelling unit where no additional units are created or the
use is not changed.
(3) The construction of accessory buildings or structures, to the extent that there is no increase in
trip generation and which will not increase the external trip generation of the principal building,
structure or use.
(4) The replacement of a destroyed or partially destroyed building, structure, or use with a new
building or structure of like size, capacity and use to the extent that there is no increase in trip
generation.
(5) Publicly owned and operated buildings or structures used for general governmental purposes (to
include but not limited to sewer, stormwater, police, fire, ground transportation, solid waste, mss,
parks, recreation and cultural purposes).
Sec. 9- 386.15. - Establishment of a trust fund.
(a) The impact fees collected by the city pursuant to this division shall be kept separate from other revenue
of the city.
(b) Funds withdrawn from the account must be used solely in accordance with the provisions of this
division. The disbursal of such funds shall require the approval of the city commission, upon
recommendation of the city manager and staff.
Sec. 9- 386.16. - Collection of road impact fee assessment.
(a) Except as provided for in section 9- 386.10 of this division, the road impact fee assessment shall be
due and payable at the time of issuance of the building permit for the land development activity
generating traffic.
permit. The Gity Will held the the eGGFeW aGGe6IRt whole the prejeGt 06 beiRg develeped aAd the
(o- b) The road impact fee shall be collected by the city manager or his designee.
Sec. 9- 386.17. - Use of funds collected.
(a) The funds collected by reason of establishment of the road impact fee in accordance with this division
shall be used solely for the purpose of administering, planning, acquisition, expansion and
development of non - site - related improvements to the municipal collector road network determined to
be needed to serve new development, including, but not limited to:
(1) Corridor studies and environmental assessments;
(2) Design and construction plan preparation;
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2016 -10
Page 16 of 30
(3) Right -of -way acquisition;
(4) Construction of new through lanes;
(5) Construction of new turn lanes;
(6) Construction of new bridges;
(7) Construction of new drainage facilities in conjunction with new roadway construction;
(8) Purchase and installation of traffic signalization;
(9) Construction of new curbs, medians and shoulders;
(10) Construction inspection and testing.
(b) All funds shall be used in a manner consistent with the principles set forth in state case and statutory
law and otherwise consistent with all requirements of the Constitution of the United States and the
State of Florida and all applicable laws. Said funds shall not be used to maintain or repair any roads.
(c) Interest on funds. Any funds on deposit not immediately necessary for expenditure shall be invested
in interest - bearing accounts. All income derived shall be deposited in the trust account.
(d) The city shall be entitled to retain an amount totaling three (3) percent, not to exceed a total of five
thousand dollars ($5,000.00), of the aggregate of all impact fees it collects annually pursuant to this
division which retained funds shall be utilized to offset the actual administrative costs associated with
the collection and use of said funds that year pursuant to this division.
Sec. 9- 386.18. - Return of funds.
If it is determined by the city that fee assessments collected pursuant to this division have not been
spent or encumbered for expenditure by the end of the calendar quarter immediately following six (6) years
from the date the fee was received, er eight (9) years from the ^ff^„+,.,^ date of this divis;^., Wh;nheve4`
oGGUFS last,. or if the development for which the fees were paid was never begun and the building permit
expired, then said funds shall be eligible for refund to the then present property owner in accordance with
the following procedures:
(1) The then present property owner must petition the city for the refund within one (1) year following
the end of the calendar quarter immediately following five (5) years from the date on which the
fee was received by the city ^r ° R (7) years from the ^ff^„+,.,^ date of this .,h nh^„ ^r
(2) The petition must be submitted to the city manager and must contain
a. A notarized sworn statement that the petitioner is the current owner of the property or his
authorized agent;
b. A copy of the dated receipt issued for payment of the fee or other competent evidence of
payment.
c. A certified copy of the latest recorded deed;
d. A copy of the most recent ad valorem tax bill; and
e. A copy of the building permit or development agreement pursuant to which the impact fees
were paid;
f. Such other information which may be reasonably necessary to ascertain current ownership
of the property.
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2016 -10
Page 17 of 30
(3) Within sixty (60) days from the date of receipt of petition for refund; the city manager or his
designee shall advise the petitioner and the city commission of the status of the fee requested for
refund. For the purpose of determining whether fees have been spent or encumbered, the first
money placed in the trust fund account shall be deemed to be the first money taken out of the
account when withdrawals have been made.
Sec. 9- 386.19. - Review.
This division shall be reviewed by the city commission periodically in order to maintain current local
data analysis, rate schedules, and reasonable regulations in compliance with applicable law. aRR61ally
d6lFiR^ the „,^„}" of n,.+ ^ " °r. The review shall include trip generation rates, trip lengths, construction and
right -of -way acquisition rates, trip lengths, construction and right -of -way acquisition costs, division
provisions, impact fee rates and other applicable items. The purpose of this review is to analyze the effects
of inflation on the actual costs or roadway improvements, to review and revise, if necessary, the
transportation improvement program, and to ensure that the fee charged new land development activity
generating traffic will not exceed its pro rata share for the reasonably anticipated expansion costs of road
improvements necessitated solely by its presence. Failure of the city to periodically undertake such a review
shall result in the continued use and application of the existing fee schedule and other data.
Sec. 9- 386.20. - Penalty.
Violations of this division shall constitute a misdemeanor of the second degree enforceable in
accordance with section 1 -15 of the City Code or in the alternative by an injunction or other legal or equitable
relief in the circuit court against any person violating this division, or in an appropriate case by both criminal
and civil injunctive relief.
Sec. 9- 386.21. - Appeals of impact fee determinations.
(a) Any person desiring to appeal an administrative decision regarding the payment of impact fees or
credits shall file a written notice of appeal with the city manager. Said notice shall be filed within thirty
(30) days of the decision sought to be appealed. A required processing fee of five hundred dollars
($500.00) shall be submitted with the notice of appeal in order to defray actual administrative costs
associated with processing the road impact fee appeals.
(b) All notices of appeal shall include a full explanation of the reasons for the appeal, specifying the
grounds therefor, and containing an documentation which the applicant desires to be considered. The
appeal shall contain the name and address to the person(s) filing the appeal and shall state their
capacity to act as a representative or agent if they are not the owner of the property to which the impact
fees or credit(s) pertain.
(c) Within thirty (30) days following the receipt of the written notice of appeal, the city manager, or his
designee, will review the appellant's written report, supporting documentation and departmental staff
reports. The thirty -day review period may be extended if additional information is needed from the
appellant in order to render a decision. Upon completion of the administrative review, the city manager
will provide a written response to the appellant constituting a final administrative determination.
(d) Any person desiring to appeal the final administrative determination of the city manager regarding the
payment of impact fees or credits shall file a written notice of appeal to city commission. Said notice
of appeal to city commission shall be filed with the city manager within fifteen (15) days following
receipt of the final administrative determination. Receipt shall be construed to have occurred when the
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2016 -10
Page 18 of 30
final administrative decision is deposited in the United States mail postage prepaid to the person
whose name and address was identified in the original notice of appeal.
(e) All notices of appeal shall include a full explanation of the reasons for the appeal, specifying the
grounds therefor, and containing any documentation which the applicant desires to be considered.
The appeal shall contain the name and address of the person(s) filing the appeal and shall state their
capacity to act as a representative or agent if they are not the owner of the property to which the impact
fee or credit pertain.
(f) The city clerk will schedule all impact fee appeals for the first city commission meeting following ten
(10) days from receipt of the written notice of appeal to city commission. Postponements of the city
commission appeal date may be granted by the city clerk if they are requested in writing at least ten
(10) days in advance of the scheduled city commission meeting date.
(g) When an appeal is scheduled for oral presentation before the city commission, the appellant and the
city staff shall each be given fifteen (15) minutes at the oral argument to present the appeal and to
discuss the submitted written record.
(h) Final decisions made by the city commission shall be in writing and subject to appeal to a court of
competent jurisdiction.
[Intentionally left blank]
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2016 -10
Page 19 of 30
DRAFTING NOTE: THE FOLLOWING EXISTING EXHIBIT "A" MAP IS HEREBY
REPEALED AND DELETED FROM THE EXISTING CITY CODE IN ITS ENTIRETY.
WINTER SPRINGS FUTURE YEAR NETWORK
WITH 1988 VOLUMES
'__:�: -- },'� 1 •Y ^� Ig� ,11 a ter' y`_
rye %
all,
--------- 0M — Ah
44
EXHIBIT A
2005 EXHIRIT R RARER ON ITC SPIRNITH PPITION OCTOBER 2005
-3- � 4 -7- -9- � 44 � 44- � 4-2- 4-4- � 44 � 4----,- � 3& 4-7- -1& 4.9-1
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2016-10
Page 20 of 30
9
P-1-F
-N, eve
Av
%-
ge
L-
4e
4
G-F
E-
m
CZ
4S4--
Type
44
j4
9+
t,,
rg
A/G
�
&a
4y-
44
Te-ta
4
Qa4
R
---
4
ee
4#-
4-
Pa+IVL
Pis4i
b, Ame
T4p-,
AttF4
e-r-a
ge-
:k4
4-
Ve
44k-
w-
Qa4
j-
0
&
4
w-
C#
j-
Gurre
4#-
G e r, *
T-t;*;;'
�f
�e
4P4
ateE�
T-t;*;;'
jq-
y-
T
w
4e
buta
jq--
L-eff
4e-
M4
ve4
+GL-
12
ef-
&4
eet
Ref-
C- t;
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2016-10
Page 20 of 30
City 1
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2016 -10
Page 21 of 30
A& R
Ra T
TFfp e
e- T
T++ f
f�&4 Te- g
gt4r e
es- #
#M €
€a Sys €
€a R e 0
0e -
e e
ege t
te- s
s- T
T-F J
J36, B
BF c 4
4A e
ee- e
es- a
a t
to
�# }
} e
ee, e
e- e
e}
€ }
}� Q
Q¢ €
€a
ee-
to t
to w
w
s- R
R+- �
� e
es-
�f
€ 9
2 9 €
9-4 3
3-34
00 "
" 4
444 &
& 4
49 5
5 €
€-9 5
5 0
0 5
5�9 X49
�€,4 �
� �
4-9 -
0- �
� 4
494 0
0- �
� 0
0- 4
4-� 4
-5 9
96 ;.:79
00- 0
a4- 0
0-
€
00 5
5s3 2
264 4
4- 4
49 4
44PP €
€-9 5
53, 0
0 9
944-,G 2-44
9 0
� A
0 4
4&m- 9
9- 0
0 �
A45- 9
9- 4
4-7- -
-5 x
x-54 :7 37
0- 0
00- 4
4- 0
00-
5€ �
�
`^ 0
00 4
4-9 4
445 4
4- 4
49 4
44:79 5
5-.9 5
5-3, 0
0 1
1
5 ;
; 9 0
4 �
4 -
94 �� :
wsmg
0 �
� 4
4, 5
5- �
� 4
� 9
9- 4
4� 4
-5 9
:?59 �
�9 w
� 0
00-
00-
5€
4;
08 G
& 4
40 4
444 5
53- 2
244 0
0 4
49-,� 8W-5-
5 e
else 0
00 0
GF-A 2
2-.5 4
440- &
400 4
0- 5
5 0
0- 0
0- 0
0- 4
4-7- 4
49- -
-5 :
:7 655 - 4-9-
4 u
use 0
0- -
-3- 0
00-
�e5'icle�►
�� 5
41 0
0-5 4
4, 0
0- 4
49 0
070- 5
5 �
5 �
555
4 4
� 5
t k
&.49 5
5 0
0- 4
42- 0
0- 4
4 0
0 5
0- t
k� &
5- w
w-
C
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2016 -10
Page 21 of 30
9 '
4,53 9-� 44
� � � � � 4,� � 40 �� �3- � � � 0 4� �� 4-�4
eRt � � 4-64 � � 0- 4-� -5 4 2 9.79
0- JWL -5-2-- -7-- 049--
� �e� � 4- 4,� � 9-4 4,�4
� 49 4 � 4,� a 40 �? �-0 � � 0 . -3-5 4,94
ewe j � � 239 � � � 0- 47 -5 �R �0
4 49 4-9 949- 4- 40 ¢ &44. �-0 � 0 44-3 -,& 4,�
� 4-- � � 0- 4-7- 9RCq q
0- park- JWL 649- 0- 46- 049--
9
-2 e 49 4 2:0 � 4- 40 � 4�4 -5-0 � 414 0 °°� &?
e 4- -2- 98- � 0-- 0- 4-7- -94 -5 4,49- �
4- GaFe JWL 4- 049--
0-
-3 4- 419 4.4
9 2� 44 � N* .9-4 4499 4- 49 444- � -5-3-. 4� 0 .4-,l 4,,.
4- 4- 9-41 � � 4-2-- 0- 4-7- -5 P
0- �4 4-3- - 0�
ae+21
4 4- � 9:-0 4,�4
4 � 44 4 -5-0 �0- 4- 40 � � 4:-4 � � 0
ee Se � 4- W-2-- � 0-- 49- 0- 4:�- -2-9- -5 39 99 4465
0- C-
� I
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2016 -10
Page 22 of 30
4 T 1" ggm2 0- 40 23:� 4.4 5 � a � ,�
4 ttFCdtCF 8-42L 15- 0- 7 9- 4-7 -5 949--
4 €
F=
Raequet 98 �€,4 34. &0- 4- 4.0 � 4:-4 � � 0 � �� 45 0 4-�4
4 � I "--I �€ 9� 4� � � � � 4-� �& � -2--- � @Q--
4�� 4-34
45-- 9 9- 9.19 9- 4-7- -5:7 1:7
0- P- 8-3- -3- 90-
9-
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2016 -10
Page 23 of 30
9$
9-4
4W
4-
40
€"
4:-4
44
0
� �
�0
€
9$
€,4
�
0
4-
90-
0
4-
9
4-7
5
�:0�
4:74
� �
€
0
983Fr�C
330
9-149
€�;
90-
0-
9-
9-
4-7-
�
-
2 29
9 465
GeRteF
-7--
90-
4
€
1�9
m
9.4
�
-10
1 OR
-7
4:-4
-54.
4W&
0
42-42
€4-4
9-
€
9-
�
9-
9-
9-
4-7-
-6-9-
-
€-4:
-5--
4
eFg
9-
90-
A4
9-
45-- 9 9- 9.19 9- 4-7- -5:7 1:7
0- P- 8-3- -3- 90-
9-
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2016 -10
Page 23 of 30
PjblFSmRg �€ � 39F�r. & 39 494 �-9 � � 0 9 499-
-7-- 0- &- 9- 4:7- -49- 7 ° W-2-
0- P 949--
9-
6 44
90 9-1, & 4r9
-3 Wi R icm� -L, 9 49- 4RA 445- 4-1-9- � 0-- 4--
0- 99-
&9-5 -5-9 &z�- 4-59 9 44.9 � 4&,, 441,
0- 9- 47- -9-7- -5 4&-
- .. i MAI A
09 � -3& 3-1&;� 0- 40 �C �-9 -5--4, � 9 1450- 0- 0S 0- 0- 4� � � 9 0
-5 � 90 � � 4� 0- -19 �r � � � 4� 9 � 4� �� 4-40
0- �� 80- 0- 42- 6-z3m- � 0- 2 659 - 9- 47- 4-3- -5 0- 00- 48- R
R - - r M Res 90 �€,4 � 4�3 0- 4r9 ¢ 2-46 �-9 � 9 ' 4�§
� s 1 65 65 0- 4-7- � -5 � 00- 7 � x-54
Gamma
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2016 -10
Page 24 of 30
99 4� 49& Q
mbpr 99- 0- -146- 44-
4 2-74 § a 44-74 4-4 � -3C
39- 9- 47-
9- 99-
9 H;;rd;Ax;; I2&, -1-1 9 "
4 " 99 99 G-RA -5-1, 443 4 -5-5- 0 95 37-5-- -54- 454 9 40"4 3-19:�
0- 19- � 49- � 47- � -5 4
� st9Fe + 9- 4 99-
9; 0 99 39: 424 9-
9 9- 0-
4 } ` 99• w4-
43-5 9 9-a , 3 58 341
� 99-
0.4 4 34 4-405
-2� 0 � �
9 99- C 95- 99- 49-
0 .111 N-111m.
BIMINI
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2016 -10
Page 25 of 30
9
tI--L5-1.-1-1
" ,
99
44
4-14
4
290-
4:-4
-5-3-
6-59
9
X34
4
Y Fetail 99
464
-5-5-
9 9 2
94 �
9-
32-
9
3�
9-
47-
�
-5 11 04
0 44
4-
GeRteF 9-
4.4
�
� 99
�
�
9-
93a
�
�
�
9
� 3�3
3�0
�
�
9�
I
+� 9
92-
�
�
47-
X4-49
X34
�
99-
�
9 H;;rd;Ax;; I2&, -1-1 9 "
4 " 99 99 G-RA -5-1, 443 4 -5-5- 0 95 37-5-- -54- 454 9 40"4 3-19:�
0- 19- � 49- � 47- � -5 4
� st9Fe + 9- 4 99-
9; 0 99 39: 424 9-
9 9- 0-
4 } ` 99• w4-
43-5 9 9-a , 3 58 341
� 99-
0.4 4 34 4-405
-2� 0 � �
9 99- C 95- 99- 49-
0 .111 N-111m.
BIMINI
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2016 -10
Page 25 of 30
24,999
0-
5
�
25-900 �
39
00
�
&
851--
-214
&9--
-7-�
0
&19;�
— 1�8
4
0
0-
4-7-
-9-4-
-5
9419 R :76 �
49,999 8-
4- 00-
50-900
48
0, 3 34
00
&
5s30
0-
0
&
59-
0
440
59
—
4
�&
4s3
0-
W
4-
�
0-
4�
-5
3 56
0R
919;999- --
9�
4A0,A00
9
4
47-9
9:4 ,
—
00
5$
948
0-
�
24
59-
0
94--Lll-z
5$9
0-9
G�4
&1-
0 QR
W-.&
-74 4�
09-998
0-
-7--
5-
5-
47-
&
A 31
4 965
00-
sc�-4�
�
�
58
5
0-
x,94
�
0
96
5$�
�4
�
094
'�9 -998
0-
4.,L
30--
0
9-
47-
-5
4
00-
2-9-
-2-
00-
-34-
4�
9-,G
00
59-
99-9-
&
0 RR
24-5-
�-9
59-
W4&
0
44-�179
-3 FeStaUF
4RA
�
94
6"
00-
0-
95-
5�
49-
0-
47-
-5�
-5
19 94
4- a
5-
00-
9-
+gt}
-1-1
8
7
-3
Twmew
W-,-9
00��994,0:
442--
5
X44
0-;o
3
54-
9
°
00-
0-
95-
9-2---
0-
47-
--4&
&
60-
090
4-
00-
Fe S
5€
0-
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2016 -10
Page 26 of 30
Past
1
—1
99
�4
�4
�
49-1.
�5
�
494
a
�9
�€,4
9-54
�8 ��
�3
9�
�
9-
�
9-
4-7-
44
��
-3- Vie-
4- 99-
4-
-3
feed W/
-38
99
�
4, -9
�
�4.
�5
�
-398
9
� � -�
4"
GF-A
�
9
Vie-
9�
0-
9
44-
9-
4:�-
-9-3-
-5
4
-2-
-3- 99-
€
99
45-
499-
�
-7�"
€-9
&z�-
499
9
� 4&,-24
4
cue
99
G-L4
W4
4-
L3
0-
9&
3-2-
-2--
9-
47-
-246-
-5
Q
0 :79
-2-F
4--
4- 99-
11934
�
�
�5
�
9-Fr�
44�
9-�
�
�
9
4�
3�5
4
4�
€
�
I
�&
�
�
4�
�
-5
5.79 -
Cq R P
PR ..._.._
4
&-
� 99-
€
E
49
�
9-74
99-.9
2-.;�
&4-.
419
9
�
4&1�98
4
eaF
-S T-
&T4-
€49-
€&
-14
9
4--
-5--
47-
-1-9-
-5
€-49
X39
-7-
-L-
99-
€
-5 9
98
24,
3,24
4
47-3
-3-4
&z�-
666-
a
4-
9
,
1-177
StBFe
94-
0-
8w-
3-5-
-3--
6-
47-
441--
-5
9 49
X39
9-
-2-
99-
€
99
4
24.
2454.
�
9&4
-3-4
&z�-
449
9
� -3
-2 6
SUPeFSt 49
G€,4
&1-
4-
4x-9
0
9 8 -
-3--
6-
47-
--A-2-
-5
4cql
-9- eFe
99—
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2016 -10
Page 27 of 30
9blPeFRq 08 08 F€,4 2_4 4-,� 4- & 4,4 -3,4 & 0� 04�
� Iii I� 9- 9- -4-- @Q-- 0 &-
3 r
244' c 9 s 6:7
4 •• I ea a gas
,9 4;
ee� 3 0 08 G€,4 94 2-59 0- 2-2- 0
W/gaseaa
g I44
0 + 9-9 08 G&-A 2-9-. 3-1.94 0- 3 A
sapeFt 8� 0- 9- 4-2--
eF I --qF-
T 08 -&.-9 €,4 349- 0- 0 94
°tee- 0- 8- 44-
8-
&P
Wal-iR -5 9 00 � 0-4 7,9-2-. �
ha R 14 00- 8 4-
4- 9-
493: 04 � 4-3- 9 @& � 44,49 �4
W-9- -5-- 4-7- 0� 3 4 659 2 35
4- 00—
439- 04 &--4- W-4- 9 4 &; 99
9.6- 4-7- 93- 3 l 0
2 9 0 3;934
444 �-9 -54. 0 �
001 9- 47- 3 00— X4-53 9�
0-
0 0� 434 49-,93
-2-- 0— 47- —7& 3 3� 9. W-6—
0 9-
- 00-
444. 3-5 -5-3- 435 9
3-5-- 0- 47- --A& 3 44 77-� 0 9- 5 -3Cg
4— 00-
3
e„T 4� 08 93� 0- 39 � X39- 4-& � 43& 9 444
ha l; k 00- 0- 98- 0- 4:�- -94 3 4
� I 3p 9- 0- 0- I 00-
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2016 -10
Page 28 of 30
Secs. 9- 387 -9 -390. - Reserved.
Section 3. Repeal of Prior Inconsistent Ordinances and Resolutions. All prior
inconsistent ordinances and resolutions adopted by the City Commission, or parts of prior
ordinances and resolutions in conflict herewith, are hereby repealed to the extent of the conflict.
Section 4. Incorporation Into Code. This Ordinance shall be incorporated into the
Winter Springs City Code and any section or paragraph, number or letter, and any heading may be
changed or modified as necessary to effectuate the foregoing. Grammatical, typographical, and
like errors may be corrected and additions, alterations, and omissions, not affecting the
construction or meaning of this Ordinance and the City Code may be freely made.
Section 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, word or
provision of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of
competent jurisdiction, whether for substantive, procedural, or any other reason, such portion shall
be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance.
Section 6. General Effective Date; Prospective Effective Date for Several Land
Uses. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption by the City
Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, and pursuant to the City Charter. However,
pursuant to Section 163.31801(d), Florida Statutes, the Land Use Categories 620, 630,815,817 and
945 set forth within the revised Table in Section 9 -386.7 shall become effective on March 1, 2017,
which is 90 days from the date that notice of this Ordinance was published in the newspaper of
general circulation on December 1, 2016 because the revised rates for those categories constitute
increases from the rates in effect upon the adoption of this Ordinance.
ADOPTED by the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, in a regular
meeting assembled on the 12th day of December, 2016.
ATTEST:
ANDREA LORENZO - LUACES
City Clerk
CHARLES LACEY, Mayor
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2016 -10
Page 29 of 30
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND SUFFICIENCY
FOR THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS ONLY.
ANTHONY A. GARGANESE
City Attorney
First Reading: November 21, 2016
Legal Ad Published: December 1, 2016
Effective Date: December 12, 2016
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2016 -10
Page 30 of 30