Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013 10 28 Public Hearing 504 Districting Commission Report COMMISSION AGENDA Informational Consent ITEM 504 Public Hearings X Regular October 28, 2013 KS RS Regular Meeting City Manager Department REQUEST: The Community Development Department, Planning Division, is presenting to the City Commission the Districting Commission's report and recommendation for the revised City Commission district boundaries, reflecting the 2010 Census and certain extrapolated data for projects initiated and platted after the Census, and requests the City Commission to hold a public hearing for First Reading of Ordinance 2013-14 (see Attachment A, Ordinance 2013-14). SYNOPSIS: The purpose of this agenda item is to present to the City Commission the Districting Commission's 2013 recommendation for the revision of City Commission district boundaries and the associated ordinance, as required by City Charter. The revision is mandated every three (3) years and must occur at least 120 days prior to the next City election (November 2014). CONSIDERATIONS: Applicable Code & Law: Section 4.02. Commission districts; adjustment of districts. a. Number of districts. The City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, shall by separate ordinance divide the City into five (5) geographical commission districts. b. Districting commission. By the first day of February, 1991, the first day of February, 1992, and every three (3) years thereafter, the City Commission shall appoint seven (7) city electors determined from the registration of the last Public Hearings 504 PAGE 1 OF 13-October 28,2013 regular election, one (1) to be appointed by each commissioner from his/her respective district, and two (2) appointed by the mayor from the City at large, who shall comprise the districting commission. Electors chosen shall not be employed by the City in any other capacity. The initial districting commission, creating and establishing the first commission districts, shall be appointed by each commissioner and the mayor from the City at large. c. Report; specifications: The districting commission shall file with the official designated by the city commission a report containing a recommended plan for establishment or adjustment of the commission district boundaries. The initial districting commission, creating and establishing the first commission districts, shall file such report within ninety (90) days of appointment. Thereafter, such reports shall be filed within one hundred twenty (120) days of appointment to the districting commission. The Commission district boundaries shall comply with the following specifications: 1. Each district shall be formed of compact contiguous territories, and its boundary lines shall follow the center lines of streets insofar as practical or possible, or other boundaries available. 2. The districts shall be based upon the principle of equal and effective representation as required by the United States Constitution and as represented in the mathematical preciseness reached in the legislative apportionment of the state. 3. The report shall include a map and description of the districts recommended and shall be drafted as a proposed ordinance. Once filed with the designated official, the report shall be treated as an ordinance introduced by a commissioner. d. Support. It shall be the responsibility of the city manager to provide staff assistance and technical data to the districting commission. e. Procedure. The procedure for the city commission's consideration of the report shall be the same as for other ordinances, provided that if a summary of the ordinances is published pursuant to this Chapter and general law, it must include both the map and a description of the recommended districts. f. Failure to enact ordinance. The city commission shall adopt the redistricting ordinance at least one hundred twenty (12) days before the next city election. If the City commission fails to either accept or reject the redistricting ordinance, the report of the districting commission shall go into effect and have the same effect of an ordinance. The proposed redistricting ordinance may not be rejected for any reason except for failure to comply with the specifications listed in section 4.02(c) of this Charter or failure to comply with other local, state or federal law. g. Effect of enactment. The new commission districts and boundaries as of the date of enactment shall supersede previous commission districts and boundaries for all purposes; provided all incumbent commissioners shall continue to hold office for the entire term to which elected notwithstanding any change in commission district and boundaries. Discussion/History: At its April 6, 2010 meeting, the 2010 Districting Commission voted 7-0 to recommend that the district map boundaries remain the same. The City Commission accepted the Districting Commission's recommendation and approved Ordinance 2010-12 on May 24, 2010. The adopted district boundaries were reflective of Bureau of Economic and Business Research Public Hearings 504 PAGE 2 OF 13-October 28,2013 (BEBR) mid-range data as defined within Table 1 - 2010 Districting Commission Background Data. Table 1 - 2010 Districting Commission Background Data Districts 1 2 4 5 Total Est. Population 01-31-04 6,808 6,755 ,746 6,713 6,871 33,893 Est. Population 01-31-07 7,112 6,998 ,979 7,122 7,084 35,295 Est. Population 01-31-10 7,117 7,111 1,984 7,227 7,157 5,596 Percentage 19.99 19.98 19.62 RO.30 0.11 2010 Districting Data Source Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR), Metro Orlando Economic Development Commission Estimates, and Florida Housing Data Clearinghouse As a result, Ordinance 2010-12 highlighted current City of Winter Springs District Boundaries as depicted within Map 1 - City of Winter Springs Commission District Map April 2010. MAP 1 - City of Winter Springs Commission District Map April 2010 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS f COMMISSION DISTRICT h1AP April 2010 •�lk - -. 6 2013 Districting Commission Data Public Hearings 504 PAGE 3 OF 13-October 28,2013 The seven (7) member Districting Commission appointments for 2013 occurred on November 19, 2012 and December 10, 2012. Upon appointment, staff began collecting relevant population data for the upcoming 2013 Commission District Boundaries. There are seven (7) distinct census tracts that are "intermingled" among the City's five (5) commission districts within the City as highlighted within Map 2 - 2013 Districting Census Tract & Commission District Map. I Lid 1 I I I St '..t 21 21i,EO V I , Ua I ' tills I I - MOM I � I I _ I I I I I I I I I I � I I I I I I Since the last redistricting effort in 2010, the U.S. Census was released. The major challenge for staff, in regards to population data, centered around the practice of switching the basis data from 2010 Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR) mid range to the finite numbers identified within the 2010 U.S. Census. Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR) population data usually tends to run on the high side, so switching to 2010 Census data proved to be challenging. Staff began calculating the general and voting age populations for each current district using the 2010 census data block numbers and then using those numbers to calculate a deviation from the overall "target" population for each district. This requirement generally means that commission districts Public Hearings 504 PAGE 4 OF 13-October 28,2013 must be "as nearly of equal population as is practicable" under the Equal Protection Clause. In turn, this will give each person equal opportunity to run for a commission seat and, correspondingly, give each commissioner relatively the same number of voters to represent from a district perspective. In essence, it's imperative that, when creating districts, the total population deviation between the most heavily populated district and the least populated district (Maximum Deviation) is no more than ten (10%) percent.. With this in mind, if the maximum deviation does not exceed 10%, a city is entitled to a presumption that the districting plan was the result of an "honest and good faith effort to construct districts as nearly of equal population as is practicable". In the attempt to further refine the population numbers to account for development activity since the 2010 Census, staff counted current certificate of occupancy data for recent projects such as Winter Springs Village, Amberly, and The Greens at Tuskawilla. The 2010 Census data identified District Four (4) as the one having the highest total residential unit count and total population. In addition, District Five (5) was identified as the district having the lowest total residential unit count and total population. The 2013 districting data identified challenges for achieving the total population deviation of no more than 10% between the most heavily populated district and the least populated district(Maximum Deviation). 2013 District Commission Data Source 2010 Census 2010 U.S. Census Data 2010 Census Population= 33,282 City of Winter Springs Census Tracts (7) 1. 214.01 2. 214.03 3. 214.04 4. 213.06 5. 213.07 6. 221.01 7. 213.13 Total Population within the 7 census tracts =49,464 Existing 2010 Census Population= 33,282 2010 Census Tract Total Population Outside City = 16,182 Existing 2010 Census Population Plus Extrapolated Data= 34,855 2013 City of Winter S rin ss Districting Commission Proposed District Totals District Votin2 A e Population Total Population 1 5438 6911 2 5618 7216* Public Hearings 504 PAGE 5 OF 13-October 28,2013 3 5446 6875* 4 5114 6866* 5 5307 6987 Total 126,923 4,855* * Extrapolated Data as detailed below Total Population Deviation Target Population = 34,855 (Total Population)/ 5 (Number of Districts) = 6,971 Highest Population (D-2 at 7,216)/Target Population (6,971) = 1.03 - 3.5% Over Lowest Population (D-4 at 6,866)/Target Population (6,971) = 0.98 - 1.6%Under Total Population Deviation (3.5 + 1.6) = 5.1% Total Voting Age Population Deviation Target Population = 26,923 (Total Voting Age Population)/ 5 (Number of Districts) = 5,384 Highest Population (D-2 at 5,618)/Target Population (5,384) = 1.04 - 4.3% Over Lowest Population (D-4 at 5,114)/Target Population (5,384) = 0.95 - 5.1%Under Total Voting Age Population Deviation (4.3 + 5.1) = 9.4% EXTRAPOLATED DATA (Incorporated Into District Totals) DISTRICT UNITS TOTAL VOTING AGE OPULATION POPULATION 2 esups Landing - 171 405 307 2 Winter Springs 478 363 Village - 202 3 Greens at 142 106 uskawilla - 60 3 Amberly - 36 85 65 4 Moss Park 199 137 partment- 84 4 Moss Park Mixed 35 24 Use - 15 Total 68 Units 1,344 1,002 District 1 Total Population Voting Age Population Census Block Data 6357 5008 Change #4 (Block Data) Add 554 Add 430 New Total 6,911 5,438 District 2 Total Population Voting Age Population Census Block Data 6597 5132 Extrapolated Data Add 883 Add 670 Change #1 (Block Data) Subtract 41 Subtract 30 Change #2 (Block Data) Subtract 223 Subtract 154 New Total 7,216 5,618 District 3 Total Population Voting Age Population Census Block Data 6384 5091 Public Hearings 504 PAGE 6 OF 13-October 28,2013 Extrapolated Data Add 227 Add 171 Change #1 (Block Data) Add 41 Add 30 Change #2 (Block Data) Add 223 Add 154 New Total 6,875 5,446 District 4 Total Population Voting Age Population Census Block Data 6632 4953 Extrapolated Data Add 234 Add 161 Total 6,866 5,114 District 5 Total Population Voting Age Population Census Block Data 6344 4838 Change #3 (Block Data) Add 1197 Add 899 Change #3 (Block Data) Subtract 554 Subtract 430 New Total 6,987 5,307 In conclusion, the 2010 U.S. Census population data helped identify four (4) specific changes to the existing 2010 District Boundary Map that are necessary to achieve the allowable maximum deviation of no more than 10%. The proposed changes are depicted below. Suggested Boundary Changes 1. Just north of Winter Springs Blvd; west of Seneca Blvd; increase District 3 by adding the 23 lots, outlined in red, from District 2 to District 3. (Chestnut Estates) 2. Just west of Northern Way; increase District 3 by adding the 76 lots, outlined in red, from District 2 to District 3. (Carrington Woods) 3. Just north of East S.R. 434; increase District 5 by adding the entire Parkstone Subdivision, outlined in red, from District 4 to District 5. (Parkstone) 4. Just west of Hayes Road; south of E. Bahama Road; increase District 1 by adding that portion within District 5, outlined in red, to District 1. Specific changes are noted below and highlighted within Map 3 - Suggested 2013 Commission District Changes below. Map 3 - Suggested 2013 Commission District Changes Public Hearings 504 PAGE 7 OF 13-October 28,2013 Change#3 Change from D strict 4 to District 'hrkst�na Subd�w�sinn ........... .i ti•i ; y hargD#2 ha..nga from 0isWd 2 to D6M ... .......... ............. ............... S t Cange#4 1 hange#1 Change fmnn Oistrlct o District 11 r ki w. hange from astrlct 2. ti-- District3 �--gheghltrt flstabes 541b�1v� f Specific Changes Change #1 - Just north of Winter Springs Blvd; west of Seneca Blvd; increase District 3 by adding the 23 lots, outlined in red, from District 2 to District 3. (Chestnut Estates) Public Hearings 504 PAGE 8 OF 13-October 28,2013 - r enge n t enge from Grstnct 2 o(),strict 3 !� r • s Change #2 - Just west of Northern Way; increase District 3 by adding the 76 lots, outlined in red, from District 2 to District 3. (Carrington Woods) l _ r --Chrnp 82 -Chang*from District 2 to District 3 - Change #3 - Just north of East S.R. 434; increase District 5 by adding Parkstone Subdivision, outlined in red, from District 4 to District 5. (Parkstone) Public Hearings 504 PAGE 9 OF 13-October 28,2013 Change#3 ,.-Change from District 4 to District 5 _ 2 -f y �TI iiiiji Change #4 - Just west of Hayes Road; south of E. Bahama Road; increase District 1 by adding that portion of District 5, outlined in red, to District 1. Public Hearings 504 PAGE 10 OF 13-October 28,2013 _ 1 - --------h Change #4 #4 han a from District 5 to District 1 _ 1 Q - r ` t �s Findings: 1. The Districting Commission was appointed City Commission action on November 19, 2012, and December 10, 2012. 2. The City Commission approved Resolution 2013-03 on January 28, 2013 providing for appointments to the 2013 Winter Springs Districting Commission; providing a due date for a report containing a recommended plan for adjustment of commission Public Hearings 504 PAGE 11 OF 13-October 28,2013 district boundaries; and providing a due date for the City Commission to adopt or reject a redistricting ordinance. 3. The City Commission approved Resolution 2013-12 on June 10, 2013 extending the time period for the Districting Commission to prepare and file its report with the City Commission from May 28, 2013 to October 8, 2013. 4. The districting commission must file a report containing a recommendation for the establishment or adjustment of commission district boundaries by October 31, 2013. The only portion of Florida State Statutes which approximates the "mathematical preciseness reached in the legislative apportionment of the state" is that found in Section 124.01, Florida Statutes, which reads "shall be as nearly equal in proportion to population as possible". The Districting Commission's recommendation achieves a Total Population Deviation of 5.1% and a Voting Age Population Deviation of 9.4% between the highest and lowest populated districts. Therefore, the City is entitled to a presumption that the districting plan, as presented, results in an "honest and good faith effort to construct districts as nearly of equal population as is practicable". 5. The recommended district map has followed street rights of way, power easements, streams, etc., as much as possible. 6. The City Commission does not have to accept the Districting Commission's recommendation. The City Commission must accept or reject a redistricting ordinance by July 7, 2014. DISTRICTING COMMISSION: The Districting Commission met on September 11, 2013 and October 16, 2013. During the October meeting, the Commission voted 5 - 0 to recommend the attached districting map and district boundaries to the City Commission (see Attachment B, 2013 Proposed Commission District Boundary Map). FISCAL IMPACT: The only fiscal impact will be new maps and staff time and is considered minimal; less than $750. This amount will be paid out of the Community Development consulting line code (1510-53180). COMMUNICATION EFFORTS: This Agenda Item has been electronically forwarded to the Mayor and City Commission, City Manager, City Attorney/Staff, and is available on the City's Website, LaserFiche, and the City's Server. Additionally, portions of this Agenda Item are typed verbatim on the respective Meeting Agenda which has also been electronically forwarded to the individuals noted above, and which is also available on the City's Website, LaserFiche, and the City's Server; has been sent to applicable City Staff, Media/Press Representatives who have requested Agendas/Agenda Item information, Homeowner's Associations/Representatives on file with the City, and all individuals who have requested such information. This information has also been posted outside City Hall, posted inside City Hall with additional copies available for the General Public, and posted at five (5) different locations around the City. Furthermore, this information is also available to any individual requestors. City Staff is always willing to discuss this Agenda Item or any Agenda Item with any interested individuals. Public Hearings 504 PAGE 12 OF 13-October 28,2013 Staff recommends that the City Commission accept the Districting Commission's recommendation for the revised City Commission district boundaries, reflecting the 2010 Census and certain extrapolated data, and requests the City Commission approve First Reading of Ordinance 2013-14, and move the Ordinance to Second Reading. ATTACHMENTS: A. Ordinance 2013-14 B. 2013 Proposed Commission District Boundary Map C. October 16, 2013 Districting Commission Minutes Public Hearings 504 PAGE 13 OF 13-October 28,2013 Attachment "A" ORDINANCE NO. 2013-14 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, ADOPTING THE MAP AND DESCRIPTION OF THE RECOMMENDED COMMISSION DISTRICTS FILED WITH THE CITY COMMISSION BY THE DISTRICTING COMMISSION PURSUANT TO SECTION 4.02 OF THE WINTER SPRINGS CITY CHARTER; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, REPEAL OF PRIOR INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Winter Springs City Charter requires that the City be divided into five(5)geographic voting districts for purposes of electing a City Commissioner from each district; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 4.02 of the City Charter, the City Commission is required to periodically appoint a districting commission to redraw the voting districts based on population and acceptable constitutional voting rights principals; and WHEREAS,the Districting Commission is required by City Charter to recommend a voting district map to the City Commission for consideration; and WHEREAS,the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs,Florida,hereby finds that the voting district map recommended by the Districting Commission on October 16, 2013 is acceptable and also finds that it is in the best interests of the citizens of Winter Springs to approve said map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS HEREBY ORDAINS,AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are fully incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2. Voting District Map. Pursuant to Section 4.02 of the Winter Springs City Charter, the City Commission hereby approves the voting district map recommended by the Districting Commission. Said Voting District Map is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and hereby fully incorporated herein by this reference. Section 3. Future Elections. The Voting District Map approved hereunder shall be used by the City for all City Commission municipal elections occurring after the effective date of this ordinance. City of Winter Springs Ordinance No. 2013-14 Page 1 of 2 Section 4. Filing of Voting District Map with City Clerk. The Voting District Map shall not be codified into the City Charter or Code. However, a copy of the Voting District Map shall remain on file with the City Clerk's office for public inspection and/or copying. Section 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction,whether for substantive,procedural, or any other reason, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. Section 6. Repeal of Prior Inconsistent Ordinances and Resolutions. All prior inconsistent ordinances and resolutions adopted by the City Commission,or parts ofprior ordinances and resolutions in conflict herewith, are hereby repealed to the extent of the conflict. Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption by the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, and pursuant to the City Charter. ADOPTED by the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, in a regular meeting assembled on the th day of , 2013. CHARLES LACEY Mayor ATTEST: ANDREA LORENZO-LUACES City Clerk Approved as to legal form and sufficiency for the City of Winter Springs only Anthony A. Garganese, City Attorney First Reading: Second Reading: Effective Date: City of Winter Springs Ordinance No. 2013-14 Page 2 of 2 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS e COMMISSION DISTRICT MAP Exhibit'A' November 2013 0 rw �w[YS9 p o y e o F a� a ® b ® a '_-� �``� a � ® o p � o � � Ed I a0 3 D AS CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS e COMMISSION DISTRICT MAP Exhibit'A' November 2013 /Attachment"B" U—, p o y e o BEEF, � �wl a � ® o p � o � � `y — i i�r 3 D Ed I MMU Attachment "C" PM CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA LLM DRAFT MINUTES DISTRICTING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 16, 2013 CALL TO ORDER The Regular Meeting of Wednesday, October 16, 2013 of the Districting Commission was called to Order at 5:30 p.m. by Vice-Chairperson Ken Greenberg in the East Hallu'' Training Room of the Municipal Buildin g (City Hall, 1126 East State Road 434, Winter Springs, Florida 32708). Roll Call: Chairperson Mark Sardo, absent - w Vice-Chairperson Ken Greenberg, present Board Member Lawrence Chmura, present Board Member Dan Finley, present Board Member Mary Hoffman, present Board Member Don Jonas, absent Board Member Maurice Kaprow, arrived at 5:38 p.m. City Attorney Anthony A. Garganese, present Deputy City Clerk Sarah Hart, present A moment of silence was followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. AWARDS AND PRESENTATIONS AWARDS AND PRESENTATIONS 100. Not Used. INFORMATIONAL AGENDA INFORMATIONAL 200. Not Used. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS,FLORIDA DRAFT MINUTES DISTRICTING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING-OCTOBER 16,2013 PAGE 2 OF 4 LEM PUBLIC INPUT Vice-Chairperson Greenberg opened "Public Input". No one addressed the Districting Commission. 0 _* CONSENT AGENDA CONSENT Cl���3 300. Office Of The City Clerk r' ' g Requesting Approval Of The September 11, 2013 Districting Commission Regular Meeting Minutes. "MOTION TO APPROVE (THE SEPTEMBER 11, 2013 DISTRICTING yT: COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES)." MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER FINLEY. SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER CHUMURA. DISCUSSION. VOTE: BOARD MEMBER CHUMURA: AYE BOARD MEMBER FINLEY: AYE VICE-CHAIRPERSON GREENBERG: AYE BOARD MEMBER HOFFMAN: AYE MOTION CARRIED. 400. REPORTS No Reports were given. PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA PUBLIC HEARINGS 500. Not Used. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS,FLORIDA DRAFT MINUTES DISTRICTING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING-OCTOBER 16,2413 oil PAGE 3 OF 4 aor REGULAR AGENDA REGULAR 600. Community Development Department The Community Development Department, Planning Division, Is Presenting The Districting Commission With A Revised Recommendation For The 2013 City Commission District Boundaries, Reflecting The 2010 Census Population. The Districting Commission Must Forward A Recommendation To The City P-17;=l Commission For Its Action By October 31,2013. ` Mr. Randy Woodruff, AICP, Senior Planner, Community Development Department :as ; presented this Agenda Item. Board Member Maurice Kaprow arrived at 5:38 p.m. R With brief discussion, Board Member Dan Finley noted that on page 7 under the Suggested Boundary Changes in item "3." the "District 2" should really read, "District 5". Additionally on page 10, at the top of the page, as noted in "Change ##3" — the following should be the correct wording, "Change 43 — Just north of East S.R. 434; increase District 5 by adding the entire..." (District "5" replaces the incorrect reference to "District 2"). Mr. Woodruff referred to page 6 of the Agenda Item and said that under the Voting Aye Population heading for District 3 it should read, "Add 171" not "Add 1741". "I WOULD MOVE THAT WE ACCEPT THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND RECOMMEND TO THE COUNCIL (COMMISSION) TO ADOPT AND THAT WE FEEL COMFORTABLE WITH THE CORRECTIONS MADE." MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER KAPROW. SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER FINLEY. DISCUSSION. VOTE: BOARD MEMBER FINLEY: AYE VICE-CHAIRRPERSON GREENBERG: AYE BOARD MEMBER KAPROW: AYE BOARD MEMBER CHUMURA: AYE BOARD MEMBER HOFFMAN: AYE MOTION CARRIED. City Attorney Anthony A. Garganese suggested to the Districting Commission that since there will probably not be another Meeting of the Districting Commission to finalize approval of tonight's Meeting Minutes, that the Board Members put forth a Motion to authorize the Chairperson to finalize the Minutes from this Meeting. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS,FLORIDA DRAFT MINUTES DISTRICTING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING—OCTOBER 16,2013 Lim PAGE.4 OF 4 "MOTION TO ACCEPT THE MINUTES (FROM THE OCTOBER 16, 2013 REGULAR MEETING OF THE DISTRICTING COMMISSION) IN ADVANCE." MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER CHUMURA. SECONDED BY BOARD Li MEMBER HOFFMAN. DISCUSSION. VOTE: VICE-CHAIRRPERSON GREENBERG: AYE = '° BOARD MEMBER KAPROW: AYE } BOARD MEMBER CHUMURA: AYE °`_{ BOARD MEMBER HOFFMAN: AYE BOARD MEMBER FINLEY: AYE MOTION CARRIED. Board Member Kaprow and Vice-Chairperson Greenberg mentioned a misspelling of their names in the Minutes of the September 11, 2013 Regular Meeting of the Districting Commission, and hoped it would be corrected. Note from the Deputy City Clerk As this was a minor and unintentional scrivener's error, it will be corrected in the final Minutes for the record. ADJOURNMENT Vice-Chairperson Greenberg adjourned the Regular Meeting at 5.48 p.m. RESPECTFULL Y SUBMITTED: SARAH J. HART DEPUTY CITY CLERK APPROVED: MARK SARDO, CHAIRPERSON DISTRICTING COMMISSION NOTE: These Minutes were Approved at the 2013 Districting Commission Regular Meeting.