Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012 07 23 Public Hearings 504 Parcel 14 B Aesthetic Review COMMISSION AGENDA     Informational Consent ITEM504 Public Hearings X Regular       July 23, 2012KSRS Regular MeetingCity ManagerDepartment         REQUEST: The Community Development Department requests the City Commission hold a Public Hearing to consider  Aesthetic Review for entry signage for the proposed Parcel 14B – Amberly - Oviedo Marketplace project located on Dovera Drive, north of Red Bug Lake Road, within the Oviedo Marketplace PUD (and Development of Regional Impact).       SYNOPSIS: The applicant is requesting an Aesthetic Review for entry signage for the proposed Parcel 14B – Amberly - Oviedo Marketplace project.  The 36 unit single-family residential project is located on Dovera Drive, north of Red Bug Lake Road, within the Oviedo Marketplace PUD (and Development of Regional Impact).    The purpose of the Aesthetic Review is to encourage creative, effective, and flexible architectural standards and cohesive community development consistent with the intent and purpose of Article XI - Minimum Community Appearance and Aesthetic Review Standards.   APPLICABLE LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY: Comprehensive Plan Ordinance 2003-43, Aesthetic Review Standards, City of Winter Springs Section 9-601.  Approval prerequisite for permits Section 9-605.  Submittal requirements Oviedo Marketplace Parcel 14B Second Implementation Agreement CONSIDERATIONS: The attached Aesthetic Review package is for the entry signage for the proposed Parcel 14B – Amberly - Oviedo Marketplace project. The submittal requirements for aesthetic review are set Public Hearings 504 PAGE 1 OF 4 - July 23, 2012 forth in Section 9-600 through 9-607 and include the following: (a) a site plan; (b) elevations illustrating all sides of structures facing public streets or spaces; (c) illustrations of all walls, fences, and other accessory structures and the indication of height and their associated materials; (d) elevation of proposed exterior permanent signs or other constructed elements other than habitable space, if any; (e) illustrations of materials, texture, and colors to be used on all buildings, accessory structures, exterior signs; and (f) other architectural and engineering data as may be required.   The procedures for review and approval are set forth in Section 9- 603.    The City Commission may approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove the application only after consideration of whether the following criteria have been satisfied:   (1) The plans and specifications of the proposed project indicate that the setting, landscaping, proportions, materials, colors, textures, scale, unity, balance, rhythm, contrast, and simplicity are coordinated in a harmonious manner relevant to the particular proposal, surrounding area and cultural character of the community.   The project is located in the Oviedo Marketplace PUD, specifically on Dovera Drive, north of Red Bug Lake Road.  The entry signage and free standing columns for this project shall be solid masonry construction and shall be finished with materials noted within the Parcel 14B - Entry Signage Aesthetic Review Package (see Attachment A).   (2) The plans for the proposed project are in harmony with any future development which has been formally approved by the City within the surrounding area.   The proposed entry signage elevations are in harmony with the architecture exhibited within the surrounding area, specifically with the architecture exhibited on the proposed units within the development.   (3) The plans for the proposed project are not excessively similar or dissimilar to any other building, structure or sign which is either fully constructed, permitted but not fully constructed, or included on the same permit application, and facing upon the same or intersecting street within five hundred (500) feet of the proposed site, with respect to one or more of the following features of exterior design and appearance: A. Front or side elevations, B. Size and arrangement of elevation facing the street, including reverse arrangement, C. Other significant features of design such as, but not limited to: materials, roof line, hardscape improvements, and height or design elements.   The proposed entry signage doesn’t appear excessively similar or dissimilar to the other structures in the immediate area.    (4) The plans for the proposed project are in harmony with, or significantly enhance, the established character of other buildings, structures or signs in the surrounding area with respect to architectural specifications and design features deemed significant based upon commonly accepted architectural principles of the local community.   The proposed entry signage enhances the character and overall aesthetics of the surrounding area.  The local community is composed of an existing two(2) story office building (Inwood) to the east and natural wetlands to the north and west.  The proposed project, and hence, the proposed entry signage,  represents a positive addition to this area Public Hearings 504 PAGE 2 OF 4 - July 23, 2012 while maintaining those areas of Parcel 14B that are designated as conservation areas.   (5) The proposed project is consistent and compatible with the intent and purpose of this Article, the Comprehensive Plan for Winter Springs, design criteria adopted by the city (e.g. Town Center guidelines, SR 434 design specifications) and other applicable federal state or local laws.     The proposed project is consistent and compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and other applicable design guidelines.  The final architectural plans will be reviewed for compliance with all building code criteria.   (6) The proposed project has incorporated significant architectural enhancements such as concrete masonry units with stucco, marble, termite-resistant wood, wrought iron, brick, columns and piers, porches, arches, fountains, planting areas, display windows, and other distinctive design detailing and promoting the character of the community.   The entry signage and free standing columns for this project shall be solid masonry construction and shall be finished with materials noted within the Parcel 14B - Entry Signage Aesthetic Review Package (see Attachment A). FISCAL IMPACT: The potential tax revenue of the proposed project is as follows:   Fee Simple Single Family Residential Units – 36 units Units 2,450 square feet assessed at 90 square foot:   $7,938,000 assessed tax value $7,938,000/1000 7,938.00 $7,938.00 (2.5600) = $20,321.28 $20,321.28 (less the 4% statutory discount) $19,508.43 tax revenue COMMUNICATION EFFORTS: This Agenda Item has been electronically forwarded to the Mayor and City Commission, City Manager, City Attorney/Staff, and is available on the City’s Website, LaserFiche, and the City’s Server. Additionally, portions of this Agenda Item are typed verbatim on the respective Meeting Agenda which has also been electronically forwarded to the individuals noted above, and which is also available on the City’s Website, LaserFiche, and the City’s Server; has been sent to applicable City Staff, Media/Press Representatives who have requested Agendas/Agenda Item information, Homeowner’s Associations/Representatives on file with the City, and all individuals who have requested such information. This information has also been posted outside City Hall, posted inside City Hall with additional copies available for the General Public, and posted at five (5) different locations around the City. Furthermore, this information is also available to any individual requestors. City Staff is always willing to discuss this Agenda Item or any Agenda Item with any interested individuals.   Additionally, 1. A yellow sign noting the date and time of the public hearing has been erected on the property.  2. On June 29, 2012, Community Development mailed a Courtesy Notice highlighting the Public Hearings 504 PAGE 3 OF 4 - July 23, 2012 proposed site and applicable public hearing dates to residents on Duncan Drive and Northern Way. RECOMMENDATION: Staff and the Planning and Zoning Board recommend that the City Commission approve Parcel 14B-Amberly-Oviedo Marketplace Entry Signage Aesthetic Review the Package as presented. ATTACHMENTS: A. Parcel 14B - Entry Signage Aesthetic Review Package B. Minutes - July 11, 2012 Planning & Zoning Board meeting Public Hearings 504 PAGE 4 OF 4 - July 23, 2012 Attachment B CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA DRAFT/UNAPPROVED MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY ü SPECIAL MEETING JULY 11, 2012 CALL TO ORDER The Special Meeting of Wednesday, July 11, 2012 of the Planning and Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency was called to Order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairperson William H. Poe in the Commission Chambers of the Municipal Building (City Hall, 1126 East State Road 434, Winter Springs, Florida 32708). Roll Call: Chairperson William H. Poe, present Vice Chairperson Rosanne Karr, absent Board Member Howard Casman, present Board Member Bart Phillips, present Board Member Suzanne Walker, present A moment of silence was held. Board Member Bart Phillips then led the Pledge of Allegiance. INFORMATIONAL AGENDA INFORMATIONAL 100. Office Of The City Clerk Requesting The Planning And Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency Receive A Draft Unapproved Copy Of The June 6, 2012 Planning And Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency Regular Meeting Minutes For Information Purposes Only. Chairperson Poe noted, e have circulated a copy of the Minutes of our previous meeting; however, we will not be addressing those this evening. They will be addressed . CONSENT AGENDA CONSENT 200.Not Used CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA DRAFT UNNAPPROVED MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY SPECIAL MEETING JULY 11, 2012 PAGE 2 OF 13 AWARDS AND PRESENTATIONS AWARDS AND PRESENTATIONS 300. Not Used 400. REPORTS Chairperson Poe mentioned that Members of the Planning and Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency met recently with the City Commission to review processes and procedures along with the handling of Applicants that come before this Board as well as the City Commission; and that the City Commission agreed to have a review of the Applicant related processes and procedures done. With no time limit placed on such a review, Chairperson Poe added, Staff has got an opportunity to take its time to review it and bring before the Commission recommendations on how to change and/or modify that process. Chairperson Poe then remarked are going to review it. And, I challenge Staff, and I know they will do extremely well at reviewing the process, in a procedure that will make it better for the citizens, as we. No other Reports were given. PUBLIC INPUT Mr. Eric Bagwell, 1133 Duncan Drive, Winter Springs, Florida: noted that he opposed the Amberly Place development and spoke of his concerns regarding excessive flooding, wildlife being affected, noise, and traffic, delayed notifications, and that the drawing on the Notice was incorrect. Mr. Bagwell also stated he had previously emailed several photographs to some of the Board which showed water accumulation in this area; and said that he currently has a greenbelt behind his property, but that if this project is built, he will have homes behind his property. Chairperson Poe inquired photographs were taken to which Mr. Bagwell stated that some of the photographs were taken over the last week and some were taken over the course of the last few years. Further comments. Mr. Robert Hill, 1131 Duncan Drive, Winter Springs, Florida: commented that he also was opposed to this zoning for this proposed project and mentioned agreeing with what Mr. Bagwell said in terms of wildlife, and flooding. Mr. Hill then commented on the number of foreclosures within the Orlando area and thought that building new homes would drive property values down. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA DRAFT UNNAPPROVED MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY SPECIAL MEETING JULY 11, 2012 PAGE 3 OF 13 Mr. Keith Wieczorek, 1135 Duncan Drive, Winter Springs, Florida: agreed with his neighbors who just spoke and also opposed this proposed development and commented on concerns with environmental issues, that he bought his property for the privacy, and remarked about filling in the existing pond. Mr. Wieczorek mentioned he did not understand why the property was not considered wetlands and asked if they could have their own environmental determination done, and then bring the results to the Board. Mr. Wieczorek also suggested that any trees planted for this project be planted to protect their privacy. PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA PUBLIC HEARINGS 500. Community Development Department Planning Division Requests the Planning & Zoning Board hold a public hearing for the approval of a waiver to Section 20-234 (5) of the City Code of Ordinances, which requires multi- family residential that is permitted in the C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) zoning district via a Conditional Use approval to provide at least two (2) parking spaces for each unit within an enclosed garage. The applicant is requesting a waiver to Section 20-234 (5) of the Code of Ordinances to eliminate the enclosed garage parking requirement for a proposed mixed-use development with approximately 15 apartment units. The subject property is located on the north side of SR 434, east of the intersection of Moss Road and SR 434. The subject property is located on a portion of the former Saratoga Condominium project. Mr. Bobby Howell, AICP, Planner, Community Development Department presented this Agenda Item and noted the Applicant was requesting a Waiver to Section 20-234. (5) of the City Code of Ordinances. Mr. Howell explained, What this provision of the Code requires is that when you construct a Multi-Family Residential Use in the C-1 zone, when you get the Conditional Usewo (2) parking spaces for each unit within . Continuing, Mr. Howell referenced a 2005 Waiver which had been Approved by the City Commission for the Saratoga Condominium project which is now being developed as part of the Moss Park apartment complex that is under construction. Mr. Howell explained this provision to the Code was to allow no garages, to permit open surface parking area, and to provide one (1) space per unit in a carport. Mr. Howell then mentioned, The City Commission, when we presented this, had concerns related to on-site parking. Staff and the Applicant have worked out these concerns; we feel there is enough parking on-site. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA DRAFT UNNAPPROVED MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY SPECIAL MEETING JULY 11, 2012 PAGE 4 OF 13 Furthermore, Mr. Howell noted, -three (63) parking spaces on-site at a ratio of five and a half (5½ ) per one thousand square feet of floor area and two (2) parking spaces for each of the residential units, so there is more than enough parking required. Next, Mr. Howell reviewed a rendering of the proposed project and expla vertical Mixed-U It would be Commercial Uses on the first floor and then apartments on the next two (2) . Mr. Howell added, request is for the Waiver to eliminate the enclosed garage parking requirement. This provision of the Code was originally put in to address townhouse units but did not . Mr. Howell further explained that typical apartment complexes and Mixed-Use facilities do not provide parking in enclosed parking garages and instead provide surface parking lots. Mr. Howell added, The Waiver request complies with the six (6) criteria that are listed in the Code. We had pretty in-depth explanations in the Staff Report, and we recommend Approval. Chairperson Poe stated, Waiver . Next, Chairperson Poe inquired whether some of the parking spaces were covered and asked about particular spaces, who they belong to and others open spaces. Mr. Howell responded that for this property, verything is surface parking. Chairperson Poe then ? esidential parking would be identified. . FOR A WAIVER OF SECTION 20-234. (5) TO ELIMINATE THE TWO (2) PARKING SPACES FOR EACH UNIT, ENCLOSED GARAGE FOR MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE THAT ARE PERMITTED IN THE C-1 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT VIA CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL FOR THE MOSS PARK MIXED-USE AREA. MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER CASMAN. SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER WALKER. DISCUSSION. for this Agenda Item. No one spoke. for this Agenda Item. VOTE CHAIRPERSON POE: AYE BOARD MEMBER PHILLIPS: AYE BOARD MEMBER CASMAN: AYE BOARD MEMBER WALKER: AYE MOTION CARRIED. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA DRAFT UNNAPPROVED MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY SPECIAL MEETING JULY 11, 2012 PAGE 5 OF 13 PUBLIC HEARINGS 501. Community Development Department Planning Division Requests the Planning & Zoning Board hold a Public Hearing to consider the Aesthetic located in the Town Review for Jes-unit townhome development Center on the south side of Orange Avenue, behindWinter Springs High School. development, which was approved in 2005 for 185 units. Mr. Howell presented this Agenda Item and stated, currently under construction. The buildings will consist of three (3) story units with split- level entrances between the first and second floor. Next, Mr. Howell referenced the June 27, 2011 City Commission Meeting and noted, he City Commission granted a Special Exception to permit the first floor to be at grade. This Special Exception was requested because the proposed townhome units are constructed that the primary entrance is a split-level entrance between the first and second stories. Basically, the entrances do comply with the Town Center requirement that they have to be twenty-four inches (24 above grade, but that as a technicality, they requested this Special Exception to do this. Mr. Howell then discussed the property, building materials used and noted, enhances the character and overall aesthetics of the Town Center and we recommend Approval. Chairperson Public Input for this Agenda Item. No one spoke. for this Agenda Item. Board Member Suzanne Walker inquired, block, but I saw in the Plans that there were also five (5) and seven (7) unit blocks; is that the plan? Mr. Howell confirmed that this was correct Board Member Walker then asked, Depending upon the number of units, the color schemes are Mr. Howell . Board Member Walker also inquired about landscaping for the property. Mr. Howell stated, Approved Final Engineering Plans. The landscaping has already been approved and is landscaped per our st Board Member Walker then ? Mr. Howell clarified, , extensively to comply with the standards of our Town Center District Code, so those are . CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA DRAFT UNNAPPROVED MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY SPECIAL MEETING JULY 11, 2012 PAGE 6 OF 13 FOR THE AESTHETICREVIEW PACKAGE FOR THE JESUP LANDING . MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER CASMAN. SECONDED BY CHAIRPERSON POE. DISCUSSION. VOTE BOARD MEMBER PHILLIPS: AYE BOARD MEMBER CASMAN: AYE BOARD MEMBER WALKER: AYE CHAIRPERSON POE: AYE MOTION CARRIED. AGENDA NOTE: THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEMS, WERE DISCUSSED SIMULTANEOUSLY NEXT, WITH INDIVIDUAL VOTES FOR EACH AGENDA ITEM; FOLLOWED BY THE REST OF THE AGENDA, AS DOCUMENTED. PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA PUBLIC HEARINGS 502. Community Development Department Planning Division Requests the Planning & Zoning Board consider the Final Engineering Plan for Parcel 14B Oviedo Marketplace, a 36 unit single-family development located on Dovera Drive, north of Red Bug Lake Road, within the Oviedo Marketplace PUD (and Development of Regional Impact). PUBLIC HEARINGS 503. Community Development Department Planning Division Requests the Planning & Zoning Board hold a Public Hearing to consider Aesthetic Review of the entry signage for a proposed single-family development located on Dovera Drive, north of Red Bug Lake Road, within the Oviedo Marketplace PUD (and Development of Regional Impact). Mr. Randy Woodruff, AICP, Senior Planner, Community Development Department simultaneously introduced Public Hearings Agenda Items 502 and 503. Continuing with his opening remarks, Mr. Woodruff stated Approval for both Final Engineering Plans and the Aesthetic Review of entry signage for Parcel . Final Engineering Plan that you have before you this evening is identical to the Conceptual Plan that was Approved by the City th Commission back on May 14 . CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA DRAFT UNNAPPROVED MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY SPECIAL MEETING JULY 11, 2012 PAGE 7 OF 13 Mr. Woodruff then Engineering Plans have been DRC (Development Review Committee) and conditions of approval were presented to the Applicant last week; they were also included in your packet for your review. Staff advises the Applicant that the conditions of approval should be addressed before submission of the City Commission Agenda Item which is tentatively scheduled for July rd the 23, 2012). Next, Mr. Woodruff discussed the Aesthetic Review regarding entry signage and stated, office building and the developments within the surroundi. Mr. Woodruff then explained Staff has had discussions with residents regarding flooding, crime, traffic, loss of conservation, and also proper notification. Mr. Woodruff noted, inning has been adequately advertised in accordance with the City of Winter Springs Code of Ordinances [Chapter 20] Division 1. Procedures; Land Use Decisions. In addition, we also sent out a courtesy notice highlighting the proposed site and applicable public meetings that are associated with the request. This mailer was sent out to residents on both Duncan Drive and Northern Way last wee. Regarding flooding concernsAgain, that is covered and has been addressed through Section 9-241. (e) of the Code of Ordinances which states that the full quantities of off-site are not to exceed that prior to development. And the Public Works (Department) Director is here this evening should you have any questions related to . Mr. The Applicant has worked with the City Arborist and they have agreed to increase the credit size by adding trees around both the retention pond, . Then Mr. Woodruff mentioned concerns regarding zero lot line and statedThis is not a zero lot line; the setbacks identified in the plans before you show a twenty-five foot (25) front setback and a five foot (5') side and rear setback Furthermore, Mr. Woodruff addressed loss of conservation issues understand that Parcel 14B in its current state was forty (40) something acres in size and there was a good portion that was conservation. The proposed development in front of you is only eight point seven (8.7) acres which is all upland. So, with that in mind, Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation of Approval to the City Commission for the Final Engineering Plan subject to the conditions of Approval that were presented to you, and then also Approval of the entry signage Aesthetic Review as presented. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA DRAFT UNNAPPROVED MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY SPECIAL MEETING JULY 11, 2012 PAGE 8 OF 13 Chairperson Poe then 502 and 503 which Mr. Woodruff suggested (2) separate Motions, one for and one for Next, Mr. Randy Stevenson, ASLA, AICP, Director, Community Development Department explained, project and I wanted to give you a little bit of context because th of this map being up there Mr. Stevenson pointed out which trees would remain and where the lot lines would be relative to the back of some of the Duncan Drive homes. for this Agenda Item. Mr. Eric Bagwell, 1133 Duncan Drive, Winter Springs, Florida: added that Mr. Wieczorek had met with the rborist about the trees and said that the Plan said 663 trees would be removed, and inquired where the City will plant the 1600 plus replacement trees for the project. Chairperson Poe mentioned that that would be betwe Mr. Stevenson explained the rborist and the Services Division Manager works with issues relating to trees and said Some of these trees are being replaced at 200 gallons; they were able to use larger trees going in. T probably use some of those to buffer this ar. Mr. Keith Wieczorek, 1135 Duncan Drive, Winter Springs, Florida: asked for clarification as to whether there will be a retaining wall on the property. Mr. Stevenson respondedo. Next, Mr. Wieczorek inquired when conservation areas were determined. Mr. Raphael Hanley, The Viera Company, 7380 Murrell Road, Suite 201, Viera, Florida: is part of an overall DRI (Development of Regional Impact), which is the Oviedo DRI (Development of Regional Impact); so, a lot of work that was done as part of developing this particular property of being entitled to development was the fact that we had to do off-site improvements or set aside property; so, the balance of - property of 14, which is everything going off to that direction is all required to be conservation area. It was determined to be conservation area by the St. Johns [River Water Management and by the [United States] Army Corps [of Engineers] as part of the original District] application when we developed the property. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA DRAFT UNNAPPROVED MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY SPECIAL MEETING JULY 11, 2012 PAGE 9 OF 13 So, it has been required to being set aside as conservation since the project was approved; roperty as set aside as But, that was the offset, was that we set that aside based on St. Johns [River Water Management District] and [United States] Army Corps [of Engineers] review and the determination of that was in fact the wetland area. And one thing to keep in mind also is that this area is lower where we are right now - has artificially kind of lowered the determined by the [United States Army] Corps [of Engineers] and St. Johns [River Water Management District] to not be part of the wetl Further comments followed on where the runoff would go after the area is filled in. Regarding runoff issues, Mr. Kip Lockcuff, P.E., Director, Public Works/Utility Departments stated the Public Works/Utility Department does not see any impact to the residents by this project. Mr. R. Lance Bennett, P.E., Partner, Poulos & Bennett, LLC, 4625 Halder Lane, Suite B, Orlando, Florida: as a member of a Planning and Engineering company, Mr. Bennett rainage for the system all goes into that existing stormwater pond - the stormwater runoff will go into this existing stormwater pond. We are expanding that pond onsite and as a point of clarification, as Randy was mentioning, here is the back of their property line. Here is about a 250 foot offset to the back of these property lines. But, yes, as far as drainage goes, there are two (2) separate drainage systems. This drainage system goes west, this goes a little to the east - and we have received a St. Johns [River Water Management District] p. Mr. Hanley provided additional information related to a Settlement Agreement reached between Winter Springs, Seminole County, and the City of Oviedo about fifteen (15) years agoequired there to be a 250 foot buffer between the back of the Tuscawilla houses and this project. Not the project itself, but actual development, - t of this . Further brief comments. Mr. Bagwell asked whether the existing peninsula of land will remain. Mr. Bennett CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA DRAFT UNNAPPROVED MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY SPECIAL MEETING JULY 11, 2012 PAGE 10 OF 13 Next, rain and flooding was addressed. Referencing a map to address retention pond flow and drainage patterns, Mr. Bennett noted drainage plans, all flows thi being able to handle additional development. for this Agenda Item. Board Member Howard Casman asked, state that this is not going to have any effect, an Applicant also I believe said this, have no effect on any additional - so, whatever they have, has nothing to do with this development; therefore this development will not increase their problem? Mr. Lockcuff responded, Board Member Casman They have your assurances of that. I appreciate that Next, Board Member Casman asked about spacing between the existing homes and the development. 250 foot buffer that was set aside, except any housing. then showed the location on the map. Mr. Stevenson further explained that it was more than 250 feet. Additionally, Board Member Casman asked, e any possibility, with the adding of this development and the work done in it, that it will decrease the amount of flooding that these people get? Mr. Bennett answered, The existing stormwater system, which is this stormwater pond, was designed to accommodate this development. What we have done Board Member Suzanne Walker spoke of possible flooding issues and asked Mr. living in this area, this type of flooding? has gone in, the flooding continuously gets worse With further comments, Mr. Department and we continually go out there and check it Discussion followed on when the Notices went out, what was required by Code, what Staff did, and was there a way to address the concerns of residents on Duncan Drive. will not look at the backs of a development? They will have that greenbelt as they are ? Mr. Woodruff said Tape 1/Side B CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA DRAFT UNNAPPROVED MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY SPECIAL MEETING JULY 11, 2012 PAGE 11 OF 13 Board Member Bart Philips commented that he had walked the property and asked how many times the pond to the northeast had overflowed. Mr. Bagwell mentioned . Further remarks followed on the level of homes and Mr. Bennett was asked about the pop off level on the pond to the northeast. Mr. Bennett northeast, the normal control which is the normal water surface level is at thirty-three point four (33.4) then it starts discharging, it starts having a pop-off at thirty-three point four (33.4) and then it stages up to, during a hundred year event, up to thirty-six and a half (36 system. Chairperson Poe sta separately STAFF WITH A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL BY THE CITY COMMISSIONMOTION BY CHAIRPERSON POE. SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER CASMAN. DISCUSSION. VOTE BOARD MEMBER PHILLIPS: AYE BOARD MEMBER CASMAN: AYE BOARD MEMBER WALKER: AYE CHAIRPERSON POE: AYE MOTION CARRIED. OMMISSION, THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD FORWARD RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL FOR THE VIERA PARCEL 14B ENTRY SIGNAGE AESTHETIC . MOTION BY CHAIRPERSON POE. SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER CASMAN. DISCUSSION. VOTE BOARD MEMBER CASMAN: AYE BOARD MEMBER WALKER: AYE CHAIRPERSON POE: AYE BOARD MEMBER PHILLIPS: AYE MOTION CARRIED. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA DRAFT UNNAPPROVED MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY SPECIAL MEETING JULY 11, 2012 PAGE 12 OF 13 REGULAR AGENDA REGULAR 600. Not Used PUBLIC INPUT No one from the public addressed the Planning and Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency. In other City business, Mr. Stevenson commented that as a follow-up to what , authorization to begin to look at the development process. I have discussed that with the City Manager . Commenting further about fairness and levels of authority, the City Commission primarily, because they have the authorization to act on that. But really begin to take a look at this process Further, Mr. Stevenson added that the City Did not put a strict time frame on us; so, , however. But I want to make sure we do it, and we do it completely before we bring information back and that we have exhausted all levels of research to make sure we get the process that we feel the City needs at this point in time for development review and things having to do with Secondly, regarding the start time of Planning and Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency meetings, Mr. Stevenson proposed a possible earlier start time, earlier than 7:00 p.m., and suggested 5:30 p.m. Chairperson Poe 5:30 Phillips and Board Member Casman. al. PLANNING AND ZONING [BOARD]/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY , GENERALLY ON THE FIRST WEDNESDAY OF MOTION BY CHAIRPERSON POE. SECONDED. DISCUSSION. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA DRAFT UNNAPPROVED MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY SPECIAL MEETING JULY 11, 2012 PAGE 13 OF 13 VOTE BOARD MEMBER CASMAN: AYE BOARD MEMBER WALKER: AYE CHAIRPERSON: AYE BOARD MEMBER PHILLIPS: AYE MOTION CARRIED Further comments followed, including how Vice Chairperson Rosanne Karr would be missed as her Term of Office as a Member of the Planning and Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency ends. ADJOURNMENT Chairperson Poe adjourned the Special Meeting at 7:56 p.m. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: CHERILYN TAYLOR, ASSISTANT TO THE CITY CLERK AND ______________________________ SEAN BEAUDET ASSISTANT TO THE CITY CLERK APPROVED: _____________________________ WILLIAM H. POE, CHAIRPERSON PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY NOTE: These Minutes were Approved at the ______________, 2012 Planning And Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency Regular Meeting.