Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017 06 12 Consent 301 2017 Water Supply PlanCOMMISSION AGENDA ITEM 301 Informational Consent X Public Hearings Regular June 12, 2017 KS KL Regular Meeting City Manager Department REQUEST: The Utility Department requests the City Commission adopt the 2017 Water Supply Plan. SYNOPSIS: The 2017 Water Supply Plan fulfills the State requirement to update the 2007 Water Supply Plan pursuant to the Central Florida Water Initiative approved by the surrounding water management districts in 2015. CONSIDERATIONS: This agenda item is needed to meet the requirements of the Central Florida Water Initiative (CFWI) approved by the St. Johns, South Florida, and Southwest Florida Water Management Districts. The City previously retained CPH to prepare a Water Supply Plan that was adopted in 2007. The CFWI directive requires the City to provide an updated version for a 20 year planning period. The adoption of this plan meets that requirement. The plan, prepared by CPH as previously authorized, includes proposed modifications to the Potable Water Element of the Comprehensive Plan and the Capital Improvements Plan, growth projections, demand projections, alternative water supply needs, mapping, updating the potable water service area, and coordination with the St. Johns River Water Management District. The City is well positioned over the 20 year planning period to meet water supply needs including allocation reductions due to the previous investments in the reclaimed water system including augmenting the reclaimed water system from Lake Jesup which is our designated alternative water supply. Water conservation efforts continue to show benefits Consent 301 PAGE 1 OF 2 - June 12, 2017 as current overall demand has been remained relatively flat and even trended downwards some years over the last decade. Staff is comfortable that staying below the Consumptive Use Permit limit of 1.514 billion gallons of potable water per year thorough 2029 is manageable by using available resources such as the Lake Jesup Reclaimed Water Plant for reclaimed water augmentation, irrigation audits, community outreach and education. After adoption, the 2017 Water Supply Plan and meeting minutes will be forwarded to the St. Johns River Water Management District. FISCAL IMPACT: There are no costs to adopt the 2017 Water Supply Plan. The plan cost $35,770 to prepare. COMMUNICATION EFFORTS: This Agenda Item has been electronically forwarded to the Mayor and City Commission, City Manager, City Attorney /Staff, and is available on the City's Website, LaserFiche, and the City's Server. Additionally, portions of this Agenda Item are typed verbatim on the respective Meeting Agenda which has also been electronically forwarded to the individuals noted above, and which is also available on the City's Website, LaserFiche, and the City's Server; has been sent to applicable City Staff, Media/Press Representatives who have requested Agendas /Agenda Item information, Homeowner's Associations/Representatives on file with the City, and all individuals who have requested such information. This information has also been posted outside City Hall, posted inside City Hall with additional copies available for the General Public, and posted at six (6) different locations around the City. Furthermore, this information is also available to any individual requestors. City Staff is always willing to discuss this Agenda Item or any Agenda Item with any interested individuals. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Commission adopt the 2017 Water Supply Work Plan and authorize the City Manager and City Attorney to execute any and all applicable documents. ATTACHMENTS: 1. SJRWMD Notification Letter (2 pages) 2. 2017 Water Supply Work Plan (152 pages) Consent 301 PAGE 2 OF 2 - June 12, 2017 Attachment No. 1 St. o n River s Water Management District Ann B. 5hortelle, Ph.D., Executive Director 4049 Reid Street • P.O. Box 1429 • Palatka, FL 32178 -1429 • (386) 329 -4500 On the Internet at www.sjrwmd.com. May 9, 2016 City of Winter Springs Mr. Kipton Lockcuff, Public Works Utility Director 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, FL 32708 Re: 2015 Central Florida Water Initiative Regional Water Supply Plan Notice Dear Mr. Lockcuff: In November 2015, the respective governing boards of the St. Johns River, South Florida and Southwest Florida Water Management Districts (Districts) approved the 2015 Central Florida Water Initiative Regional Water Supply Plan (CFWI RWSP). The CFWI RWSP Area encompasses all of Orange, Osceola, Polk and Seminole counties and southern Lake County. The CFWI RWSP contains an assessment of projected water demands and potential sources of water to meet these demands through 2035. Thank you for your entity's participation in the development process and ensuring the CFWI RWSP is balanced, addresses the water supply related issues of the region and provides a framework to meet the water needs of the CFWI RWSP Area through 2035. This letter is being sent pursuant to section 373.709(8)(a), Florida Statutes (F.S.), which requires the Districts to notify by certified mail the water supply entities identified in the CFWI RWSP as the parties responsible for implementing the various project options listed in the CFWI RWSP (Volume IIA, Appendix D). While it is not required that your entity implement any of the options in the CFWI RWSP, there are statutory provisions that require action on your part. Section 373.709(8)(b), F.S., requires water supply entities to consider the information in the CFWI RWSP and provide the Districts, in writing, the following information no later than one year of the receipt of this letter (April 2017): 1.) The alternative water supply projects or options identified in the CFWI RWSP, which you have developed or intend to develop, if any. If you do not intend to develop one or more of the alternative water supply project options identified in the CFWI RWSP you can propose one or more alternative water supply project options sufficient to address your future water needs as identified in the CFWI RWSP (Volume IA, Table A -1). GOVERNING BOARD John A. Miklos, CHAIRMAN Fred N. Roberts Jr., VICE CHAIRMAN Chuck Drake, SECRETARY Carla Yetter, TREASURER ORLANDO OCALA ORLANDO FERNANDINA BEACH Douglas C. Bournique John P. Browning, Jr. Douglas Burnett Maryam H. CQhyabi Ron Howse VERO BEACH EAST PALATKA ST AUGUSTINE ORMOND BEACH COCOA Subject: 2015 Central Florida Water Initiative Regional Water Supply Plan Notice May 9, 2016 Page 2 2.) A status report of the alternative water supply project implementation, including: a.) the quantity of water to be produced; b.) development of a financial plan; c.) facilities master planning; and d.) permitting and efforts in coordinating multijurisdictional projects, if applicable. For entities located within the boundaries of more than one water management district, we will coordinate the review of your submittal with the other District. As a reminder, annual progress reports from water supply entities regarding the status of project implementation must be submitted to the Districts by November 15 of each year (subsection 373.709(8)(b), F.S.). In addition, each local government is required to update its water supply facilities work plan within 18 months after governing board approval of a regional water supply plan pursuant to subsection 163.3177(6)(c)3., F.S. The water supply facilities work plan must cover at least a 10- year planning period and identify alternative and traditional water supply development projects, and conservation and reuse activities needed to meet the projected future water demands. For local governments that are wholly or partially in the CFWI RWSP Area work plans must be updated by May 2017. Please visit cfwiwater.com to access the CFWI RWSP and associated appendices for information regarding the alternative water supply projects or options. If you have any questions or need additional information regarding this matter please contact Kristi Cushman at 1- 386 - 329 -4308. Sim 6Annz."'Shortelle, Ph.D. Executive Director CC: Kevin Smith, City Manager Randy Stevenson, Community Development Director Attachment No. 2 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS WATER SUPPLY PLAN Engineers C I Planners Landscape Architects Surveyors Construction Management Desig4lBuiid C er of l c a to a1 A1, f h o, i za l j o. No. 000032 15 April 2017 tv1111111111J4/' ,,chae/ z., e,/ �,G E NS co ;• No.32928 i . �.ory STATE of Icc CPH, Inc. — Orlando 1 117 East Robinson Street Orlando, Florida 32801 (407) 425 -0452 CPH Project No. W04174 WATER SUPPLY PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Pace CHAPTER 1 - SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1.1 Background 1 -1 1.2 Overview 1 -2 1.3 Consideration of Regional Water Supply Plan 1 -4 1.4 Overview of Potable Water Suppliers in Winter Springs 1 -5 1.5 City Service Area Water Supply Strategy 1 -7 1.6 Comprehensive Plan Amendments 1 -9 1.7 Evaluation and Appraisal Report Review 1 -10 1.8 Economic Impact Statement 1 -10 1.9 Overview of Regional Water Supply Plans 1 -10 1.10 City Efforts to Date on Alternate Water Source 1 -11 CHAPTER 2 - INTRODUCTION 2.1 Purpose of this Plan 2 -1 2.2 Geographic Location 2 -1 2.3 Climate 2 -5 2.4 Topography and Drainage 2 -5 2.5 Surface Water 2 -5 2.6 Soils 2 -6 2.7 Ecology 2 -6 2.8 Air Quality 2 -2 2.9 Archaeological and Historical Sites 2 -6 2.10 Flood Plain 2 -6 2.11 Socio- Economic Conditions 2 -6 2.12 Scope of the Study and Limitations 2 -8 2.13 Reuse Program 2 -8 2.14 Plan Maintenance 2 -9 2.15 Water 2020 2 -9 2.16 2015 Central Florida Water Initiative Regional Water Supply Plan 2 -9 2.17 2015 Survey of Estimated Annual Water Use for S.IRWMD 2 -10 2.18 Technical Report: WATER 2070 2 -10 CHAPTER 3 - WATER SUPPLY CONSIDERATIONS 31 General 3 -1 3.2 Historical Information 3 -1 3.3 Water Quality Source 3 -3 3.4 Groundwater Contamination and Land Use 3 -7 3.5 Potential Future Sources of Water 3 -7 3.6 Current Siting Regulations 3.8 3.7 Water Treatment 3 -10 CHAPTER 4 - EXISTING CONDITIONS 4.1 General 4 -1 4.2 Water Plants 4 -1 4.3 Distribution System 4 -3 4.4 Chlorination/Disinfection 4 -7 4.5 Corrosion Control 4 -7 CHAPTER 5 - POPULATION AND WATER FLOWS 5.1 Population and Future Land Use 5 -1 52 Demand for Water 5 -2 53 Wellfield Restrictions 5 -5 5.4 Wastewater Reuse Program 5 -6 5.5 Service Area Growth 5 -6 5.6 SJRWMD Water Use and Population Data 5 -7 CHAPTER 6 - DESIGN CRITERIA 6.1 General 6 -1 6.2 Historical Water Demands 6 -1 6.3 Supply and Treatment System Criteria 6 -2 6.4 Distribution System 6 -6 CHAPTER 7 - EVALUATION OF WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS 7.1 Water Supply and Treatment 7 -1 7.2 Water Quality Treatment Alternatives 7 -5 MAPS /FIGURES 1 -1 Winter Springs Service Area Map 1 -14 2 -1 Location Map 2 -2 2 -2 Existing Water Service Areas 2 -3 2 -3 Soils 2 -7 3 -1 FDEP Well Setback Requirements 3 -11 4 -1 Water Distribution System Map 4 -4 4 -2 WTP #1 Location 4 -8 4 -3 WTP #2 Location 4 -9 4-4 WTP #4 Location 4 -10 4 -5 Lake Jesup Augmentation Site 4 -14 4 -6 West WRF Reclaimed Water 4 -15 4 -7 East WRF Reclaimed Water 4 -16 4 -8 Oak Forest Reclaimed Storage and Pumping 4 -17 TABLES 1 -1 Water Supply Needs and Sources 1 -6 1 -2 Proposed Water Supply Projects For Work Plan — Description 1 -15 4 -1 Inventory of Existing Water Storage Facilities 4 -5 4 -2 Inventory of Existing Wells 4 -5 4 -3 Inventory of Existing High Service Pumping Facilities 4 -6 4 -4 Existing Water Plant Design Capacities 4-7 4 -5 Inventory of Existing Reclaimed High Service Pumping Facilities 4 -13 5 -1 Existing Service Area Population Projections 5 -2 5 -2 Proposed Service Area Dwelling Projections 5 -3 5 -3 Summary of Demands and Peaking Factors 5 -3 5 -4 Projected Water Demands in MGD 5 -4 5 -5 Fire Flow Requirements 5 -4 5 -6 Summary of Projected Water Demands 5 -5 5 -7 Historical Data and Projected Population and Potable Water Demand 5 -6 6 -1 Summary of Evaluation Criteria for Potable Water Facilities 6 -3 7 -1 Well Capacities 7 -2 7 -2 Aerator Capacity /Requirements 7 -2 7 -3 System Projected Treatment Storage Requirements 7 -3 7 -4 Projected Peak Flow /High Service Pumping 7 -4 APPENDIC A. B. C. D. E. ES Consumptive Use Permit Economic Impact Statement Land Use Data Water Quality Data Sanitary Survey December 2013 City of Winter Springs -- Water Supply Plan Page 010 1 -1 CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 Background The 2002 Florida State Legislature expanded the local government comprehensive plan requirements to strengthen coordination of water supply planning and local land use planning. The most significant utility requirement was a Long Range Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (Work Plan) identifying needed water supply facilities for at least a 10 -year planning period. The City of Winter Springs met the requirements of the legislation by completing a Work Plan in April 2007, In November 2015, the respective governing boards of the St. Johns, South Florida and Southwest Water Management Districts approved the 2015 Central Florida Water Initiative Regional Water Supply Plan (CFW I RWSP). The 2015 CFW I RWSP requires the completion of a 10 -year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (Work Plan) by all counties and cities within a "priority water resource caution area ". These are areas where existing and reasonably anticipated sources of water and conservation efforts may not be adequate to 1) supply water for all existing legal uses and reasonably anticipated future needs and 2) sustain the water resources and related natural systems. Winter Springs is required to update the existing 2007 Water Supply Facilities Work Plan by May 2017. This document is an updated version of the City of Winter Springs Water Supply Facilities Work Plan, dated April 2007. It provides a twenty -three year planning period to the year 2040. The Work Plan looks at all aspects of the Water Supply Facilities Work Plan anew and provides a path for the future. Based on recent water plant data, it appears that the per capita consumption of potable water has decreased over time. The local government's Work Plan must project water demand for at least a 10 -year period. It was decided by the City to cover a minimum of a 20 -year year planning period for longer range projections and to assess future needs. The Work Plan will demonstrate that the current and planned water supply facilities and source(s) of water will meet the projected demand through the 20 year planning period. The Work Plan must be adopted as part of the Potable Water Element. The Capital Improvements Element must also be amended to include projects listed in the first five City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan Page No. 1 -2 years of the ten -year Work Plan as appropriate. No capital improvements were identified in this Work Plan. The Work Plan must be approved by the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) and SJRWMD. Winter Springs has prepared this Work Plan to provide the information necessary to meet the criteria set forth by the 2015 CFW I RWSP. The Work Plan addresses supply and demand for City service area through the year 2040, which is an 23 -year planning period. The Work Plan will be reviewed on an annual basis and updated to coincide with the update of the Regional Water Supply Plan by the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD). 1.2 Overview 1.2.1 The Work Plan incorporates and continues the progressive plan that the City has been implementing since they purchased the private utilities in 1984 and 1990. The City Work Plan is based on seeking economical and environmentally sound solutions for water supply. The main components of the Work Plan revolve around the following four basic areas: ® Development and optimization of groundwater supplies a Expansion of reclaimed water systems Water conservation program including conservation rate structures Q Evaluation of alternative water sources. 1.2.2 On a priority basis, the City will continue to invest and expand the existing reuse system when and if required. The City will also continue the water conservation program. The Water Supply Plan recommends continuation of the planning related to alternative water supply development. An altemative water supply is a secondary option to meet the water needs for any major changes in the Planning and Zoning that are not currently in the program. Thus, the City will be prepared for unseen circumstances. The reclaimed system was originally created in the City to dispose of wastewater effluent. Over several years of use, reclaimed water has also become a method alleviate potable water /groundwater withdrawals and increase the ability of the City Potable Water System to serve City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan Page No. 1 -3 new customers without expanding drinking water capacity. Reclaimed water has been very successful in achieving both goals. However for municipal enterprise fund utilities, decreased potable water consumption directly correlates to decreased revenues, because reclaimed water is typically less expensive than potable water. Although when available, homeowners will typically use more reclaimed water for irrigation purposes than potable water, but these differences are not always significant enough to overcome the gaps in revenue. The exchange of reclaimed water for potable water for irrigational purposes is not "REVENUE NEUTRAL ". There is a concern about the revenue impacts of supplying more reclaimed water. Traditionally, potable water used for irrigation purposes produces higher revenues because potable water is priced at a higher rate ($ per 1000 gallons) than reclaimed and the conservation rate structure creates incrementally higher rates for higher consumption (irrigation volumes are typically above 10,000 gallons per month). This is a valid concern and needs to be considered in any rate structure. However the alternate plan, continuing on the same path of using groundwater for all water needs is not sustainable. The City CUP limits the groundwater withdrawal to 4.14 iV1GD AADF by 2030. 1.2.3 The City will continue to work with the St. Johns River Water Management District (District) to ensure the CFWI RWSP is considered. The CFWi RWSP details the District's studies of water supply opportunities available to local communities to reduce their dependence on local groundwater. It is noted that the City of Winter Springs population projection data is lower than the 2015 CFWI RWSP. The City of Winter Springs population projections herein are based on specific local land use data for each parcel of land within the City Limits and projected "build -out" based on the land use. 1.2.4 Discussions with the District regarding potential water supply sources, the amounts of water available to be permitted from these sources, coordination with other water suppliers and support funding for capital projects will be ongoing throughout the amendment process. Discussions will continue year -to -year as improved water supply information becomes available, projects are revised City of Winter Springs —Water Supply Plan Page No 1 -4 and technologies to produce and conserve water are improved. 1.3 Consideration of Regional Water Supply Plan The City has communicated with the SJRWMD with regards to the relevant aspects of the CFWI RWSP that should be included in the Water Plan. The District's 2005 RWSP was a main consideration in compiling the Winter Springs Water Supply Plan in 2007. Relevant items of discussion were demand projections, appropriate water sources to meet projected water demand, use of reuse strategies, and use of water conservation strategies. On May 30, 2006, the City of Winter Springs was notified by SJRWMD of the following in a letter: "The following water supply development project(s) is /are identified in DWSP 2005 (Table 14) as options that should be implemented by your water supply entity. At least one should be implemented. St. Johns River Near Lake Monroe St. Johns River Near Deland Winter Springs Lake Jesup Reclaimed Water Augmentation Project" The City implemented the Winter Springs Lake Jesup Reclaimed Water Augmentation Project in 2013. This is project number 139 of the CFWI RWSP. The City has a 2010 10 -year Consumptive Use Permit which includes both the public water supply and the allocation of water from Lake Jesup for the Augmentation Project. The City has also expressed a positive interest to project number 113 (Reclaimed Water Interconnection with Winter Springs), when and if this becomes a viable option. No start date has been established. This is an interconnection between Sanford and Winter Springs to a ground storage system at Winter Springs. By viewing Table 5 -6, "Historical Data and Projected Population and Water Flow ", of this report, it can be seen that the average per capita consumption per day for 2010- 2016 was 100 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) based on City data. We believe the current data identified in this Water Supply Plan is the most accurate and correct information available at this time. It can be seen that the City has indicated a flattening in potable demands over the planning period. Although population increases slowly, the demand remains relatively unchanged from 2017 through 2040. This reduction from the previous water supply plan is due to the use of reclaimed water as an alternate water source. The City is also reaching build -out according to the planning department data. Available City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan Page No 1 -5 developable land is slowly being consumed within the City limits of Winter Springs. Based on this information and a continuation by the City of the residential reclaimed water system and conservation programs, It appears that the City will not need additional groundwater or other potable water sources to meet their needs through 2040. This assumes that: 1) The CUP value will be frozen at 4.14 MGD and that further additional allocations will not be available. 2) The City will continue to maintain the reclaimed water distribution system. 3) The City will continue to maintain the Lake Jesup Reclaimed Water Augmentation Project. 4) The City does not have a projected need to participate in a surface water treatment facility that produces a potable quality water. 5) The City will pursue the option of a "secondary level" of treated water for distribution in conjunction with the reclaimed water. Several options are being investigated: a. The continued use of the reclaimed supply. b. The continued use of Lake Jesup as an augmentation and supply source water. c. Connecting to the Tri -Party System (Sanford /Lake Mary /Seminole) for "secondary level" water as a source water (Lake Monroe). d. In conjunction with 2, supply "secondary level" water to Oviedo, Seminole County, and /or Casselberry through a looped reclaimed water distribution system. 1.4 Overview of Potable Water Suppliers in Winter Springs Winter Springs is located in Seminole County in Central Florida. A potable water service area map is included as Figure 1 -1. Within the incorporated area of Winter Springs, potable water is supplied to customers by the City of Winter Springs utilities system(s), self - supply water suppliers (individual wells), Seminole County Environmental Services, the City of Casselberry and the City of Longwood. Figure 2 -2 shows the relationship of the Winter Springs Service Area with the surrounding communities. 1.4.1 Winter Springs Utilities The City of Winter Springs owns and operates three water treatment plants within its corporate limits. These facilities have been interconnected to form one system and are covered by one SJRWMD Consumptive Use Permit (CUP). City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan Page No. 1 -6 Table 1 -1, "Summary of the Facilities by Water Plant" is shown below. The table is based on 100 gpcd; a max day factor of 2.0 and a peak hour factor of 3.0. Populations are rounded to the nearest 10C people: VVTPi : VVTP2: WTP3: TABLE 1 -1 SUMMARY OF THE FACILITIES BY WATER PLANT Equivalent Maximum Process Capacity Population Served Wells (4) 5400 gpm 38,900 Aeration 7300 gpm 52,600 Storage/Treatment 1,500,000 Gallons 26,100 High Service 9000 gpm (5500**) 43,200 (26,400 * *) Wells (2) 2200 gpm 15,800 Aeration 3800 gpm 27,400 Storage /Treatment 500,000 Gallons 8,700 High Service 4350 gpm 20,900 Wells (2) 3500 gpm (1100**) 25,200 (7900 * *) Aeration 3800 gpm 27,400 StoragelTreatment 500,000 Gallons 8,700 High Service 3100 gpm 14,900 Combined: Wells 11,100 gpm (8700"' *) 79,900 (62,600 * *) Aeration 14,900 gpm 107,300 Storage/Treatment 2,500,000 Gallons 43,500 High Service 16,450 gpm (12,950") 79,000 (62,200 * *) CUP Max = 4.14 MGD 41,400 See Table 5 -6 and Appendix A * *Largest pump `but of service" criteria. 1.4.2 Seminole County Utilities Water Supply (SCES) SCES supplies potable water to Tuscawilla Unit 2 via the Southeast Service Area (SESA). 1.4.3 City of Casselberry The City of Casselberry serves approximately seven (7) commercial /warehouse customers on Belle City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan Page No. 1 -7 Avenue. 1.4.4 City of Longwood The City of Longwood serves some of the area along US 17 -92 north of SR 434. These customers are within the City limits of Winter Springs. These are direct customers of the City of Longwood and are part of an interlocal agreement. 1.4.5 City Water Supplied to Unincorporated Users Winter Springs does not supply significant amounts of water to unincorporated areas. It is a general policy of the City to only serve within its corporate limits. The only site served is a tract of land (commercial /industrial parcel) at the most northern part of Winter Springs the site is just north of Shepard Road on US 17 -92. The property is currently unoccupied. 1.4.6 Self - Supply Water Suppliers There are residents in the City of Winter Springs that are on individual wells and septic systems. We estimate that there are approximately 200 single - family homes in this category. There are no plans to extend water service lines into these areas at this time. 1.5 City Service Area Water Supply Strategy The City's approach to meeting the projected water demand over the next 10 years is by first optimizing the use of potable groundwater while protecting the City's natural resources. This strategy is based on the following basic diversifying principles: 1. Optimize the use of the existing groundwater resources in an environmentally effective manner. 2. Continue the implementation of water conservation initiatives. Evaluate effectiveness of measures and adjust if necessary, 3. Review and modify land development regulations to affect reduction in potable water use patterns. 4. Effect short -term reduction in per capita water use by both water conservation and replacing current potable water irrigation with lower quality water such as reclaimed water. Evaluate effectiveness of implemented retrofit projects to reduce potable water usage. Continue implementation of the residential reuse system. Optimize City of Winter Springs _ Water Supply Plan Page No. 1 -8 participation in areas where reclaimed lines are already available for use. 5. Continue to require future development to provide facilities (gray water lines) for lower quality water for irrigation. 6. Continue evaluation and development of Alternative Water Supplies and/or augmentation sources. 7. Support regional water supply initiatives. 8. Seek funding assistance on reclaimed water and alternative water supply programs to reduce burden on customer base. 9. Consider value of private irrigation wells or irrigation systems based on stormwater ponds. If appropriate, consider pilot project in suitable residential area. The City will continue to invest in their existing reuse system and water conservation programs. The Water Plan recommends continuing with the residential reclaimed water retrofit program and continuing the planning related to alternative water supply development. The residential reclaimed water system currently serves 2040 customers. The average daily demand per customer was approximately 1068 gallons per day. In order to develop capital projects to meet water demands for the next 10 years, certain projections and assumptions were required. These assumptions were made based on the best information available at this time. Because the City's water supply strategy is diversified, and there are many unknowns related to regulatory permitting of both current (groundwater) and future (brackish and surface water) sources, it will be necessary to review these assumptions on a regular basis in future Water Plan updates. Table 1 -1, "Water Supply Needs and Sources" identifies the projections of the potable water demands. The table identifies the SJRWMD permitted allocation versus the current demand to determine the groundwater surplus or deficit in the service area. If the CUP was frozen at the 2006 level, no additional sources would be required through 2020 based on current projections. 1.5.1 Summary of Ten -Year Capital Facility Projects The guidelines for preparing the Work Plan require that the water supply capital facilities projects be included in the Capital Improvements Element (CIE). Since the Work Plan does not require any improvements in the next 5, 10, 15 or 20 years, there is no detail shown. City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan Page No. 1 -9 1.6 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Legislative changes, requiring the coordination of water supply planning to local land use planning, necessitate that the Water Facilities Work Plan is incorporated into the City's Comprehensive Plan, by May, 2017. Specifically, the Comprehensive Plan is required to: 1- Address the water supply concurrency requirement; 2- Ensure intergovernmental coordination with the SJRWMD; 3- Ensure that the Winter Springs' Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map are based upon the availability of adequate water supplies; 4- Include selected alternative water supply projects. These changes affect the following elements: Future Land Use Element; Conservation Element; Infrastructure Element, Potable Water Sub- element; Intergovernmental Coordination Element; and Capital Improvements Element. The required Comprehensive Plan amendments are exempt from the twice -a -year limitation on major amendments to the Comprehensive Plan [Section 163.3177(6)(c), F.S.]. Listed below is a summary of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment requirements for Water Facilities Work Plans: 1. Coordinate all aspects of their comprehensive plan with the appropriate Water Management District's regional water supply plan (see s. 163.3177(4)(a), F.S.). (For WinterSprings, this is the SJRWMD Regional Water Supply Plan.) 2. Revise the Potable Water Sub- Element considering the appropriate Water Management District's regional water supply plan (s.163,3177(6)(c),F.S.). (For the 2007 Winter Springs Water Facilities Work Plan, this is the SJRWMD 2005 District Water Supply Plan and addendum of October 2006.) 3. Revise the Potable Water Sub - Element to include a Water Supply Facilities Work Plan for at least a 10 -year planning period addressing facilities for which the local government is responsible (s.163.3177(6)(c)F.S.). City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan Page No. 1 -10 4. Revise the Conservation Element to ensure that projected water needs and sources are for at least a 10 -year planning period and that full consideration is given to the appropriate regional water supply plan or, in the absence of an approved regional water supply plan, the district water management plan (s. 163.3177(6)(d)F.S). 5. Revise the Intergovernmental Coordination Element to ensure coordination of the comprehensive plan with the applicable regional water supply plan (s. 163.3177(6)(h)1.,F.S). Additionally, all new land use amendments submitted to the Florida Department of Community Affairs for review, are now required to include data and analysis demonstrating that a sufficient supply of water is available to meet any increase in water demand created by the proposed land use change. 1.7 Evaluation and Appraisal Report Review The Winter Springs EAR will be required to include a review of progress made in implementing the Water Facilities Work Plan. Specifically, the EAR must address the extent to which Winter Springs has implemented the Water Facilities Work Plan for building public, private and regional water supply facilities and the development of alternative water supplies. Additionally, the report must also include a determination as to whether the identified alternative water supply projects, traditional water supply projects, and the conservation and reuse programs have met local water use needs. 1.8 Economic Impact Statement See Appendix C. 1.9 Overview of Regional Water Supply Plans In anticipation of the rapid population growth and increasing water demands facing the state and the potential threats to both the economy and natural resources, the Legislature amended the Florida Water Resources Act (Chapter 373, F.S.) in 1997. The amendments required the five Water Management Districts to initiate regional water supply planning in all areas of the state where reasonable anticipated sources of water were deemed inadequate to meet year 2020 projected demands. Four of the Districts were required to complete regional water supply plans: Northwest Florida, Southwest Florida, St. Johns River, and South Florida. City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan Page No. 1 -11 A RWSP includes a projection of water demands and an identification of potential sources of water to meet these demands. The RWSP looks forward in time for 20 years and is intended to provide the framework for future water supply decisions in the areas where it has been determined that traditional sources of water are not adequate to provide for future needs while sustaining the water resources and related natural systems. Within these areas existing and reasonably anticipated sources of water and conservation efforts may not be adequate to (1) supply water for all existing legal users and reasonably anticipated future needs and (2) to sustain the water resources and related natural systems. The RWSP identifies potential water supply source options for water supply development, including traditional and alternative sources that will exceed the needs projected by the district. The RWSP also estimates the associated costs for developing these sources. Sources include (1) new well fields, (2) increased use of reclaimed water, (8) storage reservoirs, (4) surface water withdrawals, (5) aquifer storage and recovery, (6) reverse osmosis /desalination and (7) conservation. The water source options identified in the RWSP represent a "menu" of possible options for water supply development from which local governments, government -owned and privately owned utilities, self - suppliers and others may choose. The options are provided as reasonable concepts that water users in the region can pursue in their water supply planning. Water users may want to select a water supply option as presented in the plan or combine elements of different options that better suit their water supply needs. Additionally, the plan provides information to assist water users in developing funding strategies to construct water supply development projects. The goal of the RWSP is to identify sufficient sources of water within the planning region to meet projected water demands. Prior to future development of any water supply option, it will be necessary to meet the conditions for issuance of and obtain all applicable permits. Following a decision to pursue any option identified in the RWSP, it will be necessary for the interested party(ies) to conduct more detailed engineering, hydrologic, economic and biological assessments to provide the necessary technical support for developing the option. Each RWSP is updated every five years. 1.10 City Efforts to Date on Alternate Water Sources The City has successfully reduced the per capita consumption from a high 145 gpd in 1998 to a low of 100 gpd in 2016. This is due in large part to the implementation of a residential reclaimed system, City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan Page No. 1 -12 which now has 2040 residential connections utilizing a flow of approximately 2.2 MGD, average daily flow. At the current population level, we estimate that consumption has been decreased by approximately 1.5 MGD from the 1998 level estimates of equivalent flow using identical population. We also believe that the difference is the result of other conservation measures such as conservation block rates implemented in the City's water rate structure and from the fact that new developments have occurred that utilize a denser configuration such as Townhouses, Apartments and Condominiums. The remaining land available for development within the City service area is not land zoned for single - family residential where most of the irrigation takes place. We therefore believe that the per capita consumption will continue at 100 gpcd. The largest drawback to reclaimed water is that not enough is available as can be seen by the data; water use is about 100 gpcd and the sewerage flow generated is about 63 gpcd. This represents a loss of 40 gpcd. Also, irrigation demand on a single- family house exceeds the amount of wastewater generated by a single - family residence. The irrigation demand is over four (4) times greater than the sewerage generated. This is based on available data from the City and represents single - family home usage in areas with larger lots. Our projections for the use of reclaimed water indicate that public reception is above average and that it is a viable source of water to the City. It reduces potable water demand and allows the City to use potable water for new development at its highest and best use. The City will also endeavor to improve their conservation educational efforts. The following items will be considered: 1. Implement ordinances that encourage water conservation, xenscape landscaping and low water use devices, etc. 2. Implement educational opportunities with local schools, such as "Drop Savers" and "Project WET ". 3. Develop a water efficient landscape demonstration project. 4. Display water conservation exhibits at City public places. 5. Develop a communication program for water users. Distribute flyers that identify water conservation ideas. City of Winter Springs —Water Supply Plan Page No. 1 -13 EXHIBITS TO THE WORK PLAN SUMMARY Figure 1 -1 -Winter Springs Service Area Map Table 1 -1 — Summary of the Facilities by Water Plant Table 1 -2 — Proposed Water Supply Projects for Work Plan \R // f l I_ F n\ I r~ �1 Tz —cm i �I I i I 4 1 1 I 1 I � � 1 I I I � ?L l r ` 1 r 1 e^ i mm It i I f 1 j V 1 I i l i S 1 1 4 s l I S Plan Prepares sr Will. Into pale: 417117 Job No. W04174 �k Z. WATER SERVICE AREA MAP FIGURE AA.. Eng.. C.O.A. No. 7143 SurveyN. N.ephcor 1 -1 Scale: N.T.S. A2603 p,co m LW p. Uo. NO.. LCOOD0293 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS WATER SUPPLY PLAN File:s NmAmadwg 1117 E. Robinson St - Orlando, Fl. 32801 -Ph: 407.425.0452 02017 Pay, 1 .14 City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan Page No. 1 -15 TABLE 1 -2 PROPOSED WATER SUPPLY PROJECTS FOR WORK PLAN There are no projects necessary to meet the 10 -year potable water supply needs of the City of Winter Springs. Other noteworthy (but not required for capacity) future items are as follows: Investigate, identify and purchase alternate well sites in case of failure of an existing well. 2. Installation of a standby generator at WTP2 instead of the LP gas drive engine after 2415. 3. Additional treatment required by drinking water regulations of FDEP and/or EPA. City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan Page No. 2 -1 CHAPTER 2 INTRODUCTION 2.1 Purpose of this Plan The purpose of this Water Facilities Work Plan is to analyze the capabilities of the existing water system, compare those capabilities to current and future needs and to project a minimum 19 -year program for further development of the City's total water system. The Plan includes evaluations of the capacities, preliminary locations of additional needed facilities, and a description of techniques which may be appropriate for implementation of the system described by the Plan. Contained within this report is a detailed description and analysis of the Winter Springs Water System, future growth (population) and potable water demand. 2.2 Geographic Location The City of Winter Springs is centrally located in Seminole County, south of Lake Jesup, north of Casselberry and unincorporated Seminole County, east of U.S. 17 -92 and mostly west of S.R. 417 (the Greenway). The City stretches north and south along the S.R. 434 corridor from US 17 -92 to the Greenway. The City is served by a number of arterial highways including U.S. 17 -92, and State Roads 417, 419 and 434. Figure 2 -1 shows the location of winter Springs within the county and state. 2.2.1 Water Service Area The projected future water service area, the planning area and the City limits (one in the same) is shown in Figure 1 -1. The water service area was established in cooperation with the City staff. Figure 2 -2 shows the relationship of the Winter Springs Service Area with the surrounding communities. Winter Springs does not supply significant amounts of waterto unincorporated areas. It is a general policy of the City to only serve within its corporate limits. The only site served is a tract of land (commercial /industrial parcel) at the most northern part of Winter Springs the site is just north of Shepard Road on US 17 -92. This commercial property is currently unoccupied. �e _ �i�Q® r mot" CS ° 0•ff � �'1 1 _. • r Li � d o..• z W SR 4 �,•6. OELERYAVE 'R MARKHAM RD r �. O &A 46A 5 HST x E�4 E SR ar O MARY BL E LA A a3 0ry O ur s A r� N 'a - "US RD � � r, a MIN ; 434 SR4 I • [J 7 Nc S ■ CITY aF 12436 • ° ® o VA SPRINGS SPRING NGS x . W R LT MiQ¢2T ,aR EqL h0SOR E s F-0 O Sys Jp 46 YT ! a�� .•�' ° fit' �'"tCi � nn O y _, U p ;. wC�479 000. °a ,i_a,r'Y• . 7 a ! M D �K U N atee NTS A LOCATION MAP F� 2-1 Date: 4!17/2017 Photo date: NA 2 -� PAGE Project 9 M4174 r N CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS 2 CITY OF LAKE MARY uj CITY OF SANFORD a v SPRING HAMMOCK to GREEN WAY BLVD o m 3 SEMINOLE COUNTY UTILITIES �.v SEMINOLE COUNTY UTILITIES 1 CITY OF LONGWOODn�n'�`e'1w�f "'f!+ #`p SEMINOLE COUNTY z z UTILITIES'+•• � `� . 1y ow; -- 1 )) 4 YVSR414 VV BROADWAY 5 CITY OF OVIEDO WINTER SPRINGS w - - - S c AQUA UTILITIES & ' f CITY OF CASSELBERRY w V C) t - 7.ilM"ll�.i �i LAKE OR KE OR E LA w CITY OF ALTAMONTE SPRINGS co 0) f SEMINOLE COUNTY UTILITIES E MRCHELL HAMMOCK RD SEMINOLE COUNTY psi t� UTILITIES g RED B LAKE RD VtA W HAPMAN D CITY OF CASSELBERRY \ T SEMINOLE COUNTY UTILITIES Date; /1 S EXISTING WATER SERVICE AREAS Date; 4117!2017 FIGURE i Photo date: NA 2 -2 Project #: VV04174 N CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS PAGE Biologist: GIS: RCp 2_3 w z z � `� . �a a -- 1 )) '6 V VV BROADWAY 5 CITY OF OVIEDO S c a & w w co 0) E MRCHELL HAMMOCK RD t� W HAPMAN D Date; /1 S EXISTING WATER SERVICE AREAS Date; 4117!2017 FIGURE i Photo date: NA 2 -2 Project #: VV04174 N CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS PAGE Biologist: GIS: RCp 2_3 City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan Page No 2 -4 2.2.2 Water Self Supply Area The City has several areas within the City limits that are developed, but are on wells for their water source. The SJRW MD describes these areas as Domestic Self Supply, The subdivisions are known as: Dunmar Estates (31 total lots); North Orlando Ranches Sections 1 (24 total lots), 1A (39 total lots), 1 B (26 total lots), 5 (24 total lots), 6(40 total lots) and 7 (46 total lots); and, Tuscawilla Unit 5 (7 total lots). Dunmar Estates has water mains within the central roadway corridor, but not all units are connected to the City water supply system. Approximately 25% are connected to the City system. North Orlando Ranches Sections 1A, 5, 6 and 7 have no homes connected to the City system. North Orlando Ranches Sections 1 and 1 B are mixed with several homes connected to the water mains on the main roadways in the area, Panama and Bahama. Tuscawilla Unit 5 is mixed and several homes along Tuscawilla Trail are connected to the City system. There are approximately 200 single family homes on water self - supply. 2.2.3 Water Areas Served by other Utilities Seminole County Utilities Water Supply (SCES) SCES supplies potable water to Tuscawilla Unit 2 via the Southeast Service Area (SESA). This is an area that includes approximately 65 single - family homes (22,750 gpd). It is very small in comparison with the overall SESA capacity and should be adequately served by SESA. The amount of water sold to City residents is a small fraction of the County's overall water demand See the Seminole County Water Supply Facilities Work Plan for details on their system(s). The two systems are not interconnected. City of Casselberry The City of Casselberry serves approximately seven (7) commercial /warehouse customers on Belle Avenue. These customers are in the City limits of Winter Springs. These are direct customers of the City of Casselberry and are not part of a wholesale or interlocal agreement. These are very small users and should be adequately served by Casselberry since they are a small fraction of their service capability. See the Casselberry Water Supply Facilities Work Plan for details on their system and their capabilities. The Cites of Casselberry and Winter Springs have an emergency water interconnect on Murphy Road at the border of Winter Springs and Casselberry. City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan Page No 2 -5 City of Longwood The City of Longwood serves some of the area along US 17 -92 north of SR 434. These customers are within the City limits of Winter Springs. These are direct customers of the City of Longwood and are part of an interlocal agreement. These are very small users and should be adequately served by Longwood since they are a small fraction of their service capability. See the Longwood Water Supply Facilities Work Plan for details on their system and their capabilities. City of Oviedo The Cites of Oviedo and Winter Springs have a proposed emergency water interconnect on Winter Springs Boulevard by SR 417. This project was not implemented because of the different methods used for disinfection by the two communities. 2.3 Climate Central Florida is generally humid and warm with long summers and mild winters. Rainfall is generally greatest in July and August with annual rainfall between 45 and 50 inches. April and May are generally dry months with a high irrigation demand. Irrigation demand is also high during the summer due to high evapotranspiration. 2.4 Topography and Drainage The Winter Springs area is relatively flat with numerous streams such as: Gee Creek, which flows through the center of the City; Howell Creek, which flows through the southern and eastern ends of the City; and Soldiers Creek, which flows through the northern and western end of the City. All streams flow to Lake Jesup. Elevations range from 10 to 50 feet NGVD. The planning area is predominantly developed with only minor infill areas remaining. Redevelopment is occurring along U.S. 17 -92, S.R. 434, SR 419 and Tuscawiila Road. 2.5 Surface Water There are no Outstanding Florida Waters in the planning area. All surface waters are designated Class III waters, suitable for recreation and for propagation of fish and wildlife. City of Winter S rin s — Water Supply Plan Page No. 2 -6 2.6 Soils Soils have been mapped by the Natural Resources Conservation Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. This information is shown in Figure 2 -3, "General Soil Characteristics ". Sand, sandy clay, muck and made land make up most of the soils in the area. The muck is concentrated along the streams and lakes. These soils represent the surface soils of about 20 feet deep with the Hawthorne formation to 100 -foot depth over the Floridan Aquifer. 2.7 Ecology Wetlands border the surface water bodies that drain the City. No encroachment on existing wetlands is proposed or anticipated. The area is predominantly developed and there are no known prime or unique farmlands or plant and animal communities. 2.8 Air Quality Air quality within the planning area is considered to be in attainment of the State and Federal Ambient Air Quality Standards, 2.9 Archeological and Historical Sites There are no known significant archaeological and historical sites in the planning area. 2.10 Flood Plain Flood plains are generally confined to the areas immediately adjacent to the streams of Gee Creek, Soldiers Creek, Howell Creek and Lake Jesup. The latest report is Flood Insurance Study, Seminole County, Florida and Incorporated Areas, dated September 28, 2007. 2.11 Socio- Economic Conditions 2.11.1 Population Population data is contained in Chapter 5. 2.11.2 Land Use and Development The planning area is primarily residential with limited commercial and light industrial uses. Land use is established in the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan. Figures showing Land Use are contained in Appendix C. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FLORIDA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATIONS GFNFJUL SOIL M" SEMNO I .n. IN V Ml Y y F?RMA SOIL ASSOCATIONS ❑BLANTON- LAKELAND ASSOCIATION: UNDULATING,MODERATELY WELL DRAINED TO SOMEWHAT EXCESSIVELY DRAINED, SANDY SOILS INTERSPERSED WITH LAKES, PONDS AND WET, DEPRESSIONS. 0 BLANTON- LEON - PLUMMER ASSOCIATION: NEARLY LEVEL MODERATELY WELL DRAINED, SANDY SOILS INTERSPERSED WITH AREAS OF SLIGHTLY WET AND WET SOILS, AND DOTTED WITH LAKES AND PONDS. F4 LEON- IMMOKALEE- PLUMMER ASSOCIATION: NEARLY LEVEL, SOMEWHAT POORLY DRAINED, SANDY SOILS UNDERLAIN BY A BROWN, STAINED PAN, AND VERY POORLY DRAINED SOILS IN SLOUGHS, SWAMPS, AND PONDS, LEON - DELRAY -ST, JOHNS ASSOCIATION: NEARLY LEVEL, SOMEWHAT POORLY DRAINED TO VERY POORLY DRAINED SOILS THAT ARE SANDY TO A DEPTH OF MORE THAN 30 INCHES, 0 POMPANO- DELRAY ASSOCIATION: NEARLY LEVEL, POORLY DRAINED AND VERY POORLY DRAINED SOILS THAT ARE SANDY TO A DEPTH OF MORE THAN 30 INCHES. 10 ISTOKPOGA ASSOCIATION: NEARLY LEVEL, VERY POORLY DRAINED WOODY PEAT SOILS. 11 SWAMP ASSOCIATION: NEARLY LEVEL AREAS OF FRESH WATER SWAMP COVERED BY WATER MOST OF THE TIME. y {, 'N: = r Lit 1 P ,Iti+ V rr r+ ' r _ y l GRA i� rian rrepareu Lsy. Dare. 4/7/2017 CPW, Inc. L icenses; JOb NO. W04174 Eng. C, O.A. No. 3215 Survey L.B. No. 7143 Wwww.cphco Scale: NONE Arch. Lic. No- AA2600926 com Lndscp. Lic. No. LC0000298 File: Soil Map 1117 E. Robinson St. - Orlando, Fl. 32801 -- Ph: 407.425.6452 (02017 r � ma gym• tN, N 9 GENERAL SOIL CHARACTERISTICS FIGURE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS 2 -3 WATER SUPPLY PLAN SEMINOLEIFLORIDA Page 2 -7 City of Winter S nn s — Water Supply Plan Page No. 2 -8 2.12 Managerial Capacity The City of Winter Springs has the sole responsibility and authority to build, operate and maintain the water system. The operations of the facilities are provided by City employees. 2.13 Scope of the Study and Limitations This study generally refers to and presents a long -range plan to meet the expected demands on the water production, water quality and distribution system. It includes discussion on phasing, financing, and flexibility that will provide general information and guidance to the City as the systems are developed. The opinions of probable cost presented in this report are only to planning level accuracy. Costs of all future water lines are projected at an average unit cost (for given sizes) without regard to specific details such as differing site conditions, soils, necessary valves, hydrants and appurtenances, etc. The estimated project costs for items such as surveying, soils testing, engineering, legal, and administrative, are included in the cost figures. The phasing in this plan provides a starting point and provides a general concept of the way in which the physical system may develop and improve over the years. Improvement timing will depend on the actual needs at various times in the future, and the financing techniques available at those times. Timing of the improvements in the undeveloped areas is dependent upon the actual construction implementation schedules of the developers. Therefore, the City has only limited control over the timing of line improvements in these areas. Evaluation of water treatment requirements is based on current regulatory requirements and requirements under consideration for implementation. As major changes occur, the water treatment techniques should be reevaluated. Current regulatory items assessed herein are: a) Stage 1 /I1 of the Disinfection /Disinfection By- Products Rule (DBPR); b) Groundwater Disinfection Rule (chlorine and turbidity) (GDR); C) OSHA Process Safety Management (PSM) and EPA Risk Management Plan (RMP) (chlorine); d) Lead and Copper Rule (corrosion) (LCR); e) Total Coiiform Rule (TCR); and f) Consumer Confidence Rule (CCR) (reporting to the public). The timing and density of the projected development presents the most unpredictable limitation on the study. The nature of projected development can have a significant impact on the amount of City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan Page No 2 -9 water demand. If land use density (of the geographical areas) changes, then the water demand will also change. When that occurs, the Work Plan should be reviewed and modified. 2.14 Reuse Program The St. Johns River Water Management District has implemented a program encouraging the reuse of wastewater effluents to decrease the amount of withdrawal from the Floridan Aquifer for nonpotable uses such as irrigation. The City currently provides effluent to the Tuscawilla Golf Course, and residential areas. The effluent is treated to an unrestricted public access standard, meaning it has been filtered and disinfected to high -level disinfection standards. The expansion of the irrigation program into residential areas has and will continue to reduce the demand for water from the potable system. The benefits of the reuse program are significant for several reasons including: reducing the withdrawals from the Floridan Aquifer, decreasing surface water discharges, providing a cost effective effluent disposal method and increasing groundwater recharge. 2.15 Plan Maintenance The Plan should be reviewed every year and evaluated based on regulatory changes, water quality, actual growth, and experience with the reuse program, The network of transmission mains is a major and critical part of the system. A water plant's value is certainly limited by the ability to transmit water to all locations through the system at adequate volume and pressure. A mathematical model of the transmission system will be maintained in the files and on the Engineer's computer for subsequent computer analysis to see if the water uses, as revised, would require any adjustment of the recommended transmission system improvements. 2.16 2015 Central Florida Water Initiative Regional Water Supply Plan (CFWI RWSP The CFWI RWSP Area encompasses all of Orange, Osceola, Polk and Seminole counties and Southern Lake County. The CFWI RWSP contains an assessment of projected water demands and potential sources of water to meet these demands through 2035. The CFWI RWSP is balanced, addresses the water supply related issues of the region and provides a framework to meet the water needs of the CFWI RWSP Area through 2035. The CFWI RWSP concluded that the current and future water demands of the CFWI Planning Area can be met through the 2035 planning horizon, while sustaining the water resources and related natural systems, through conservation, implementation of management City of Winter Springs — Water Su I Plan Page No. 2 -10 strategies and measures, and implementation of water supply projects identified in the CFWI RWSP. However, for water resource sustainability to be realized, many actions by the Districts and stakeholders will have to occur. Recommended actions for implementation are included in Chapter 11 of the CFWI RWSP. The City of Winter Springs has implemented many of the recommended actions and will continue to keep pace with the many changes on the horizon. The SJRWMD is continuously in the planning /update phase for water quantity inside the District because of the many complex issues related to water supply. They are evaluating impacts of existing and proposed water withdrawals from the Floridan Aquifer. They are also assessing the feasibility of alternate water sources and locations. 2.17 2015 Survey of Estimated Annual Water Use for SJRWMD — SJ2016 -FS3 This report covers the following: 1) 2015 rainfall was 6% lower than the average over the last five years; 18% lower than last year (2014). 2) 2015 Total water use was 7% lower than the average over the last five years. 3) 2015 Public Supply Water Use increased by 5% from 2014; population from 2011 to 2015 increased 2% and water use decreased 3 %. 4) Per capita use increased from 131 to 137 gpcd approximately. 2.18 Technical Deport: WATER 2070 In November 2016, The Geoplan Center at the University of Florida published a Technical Report called Water 2070. The purpose of Water 2070 is to explore the impact on water demand based on projected population distribution in the year 2070. Seminole County is expected (in this report) to have a population of 562,300 by the year 2040. The last reported population in the study is April 1, 2014 and it is 437,086. This yields a change of 125,214 or an increase of 28.65 percent over 26 years. The City of Winter Springs is not experiencing this rate of growth and the City of Winter Springs future land use map and "Build -out" projections do not support this level of population growth. The report also indicates that the current consumption per capita is 135 gpcd and is expected to City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan Page No. 2 -11 rise to 139 gpcd. This also is not the experience of the City of Winter Springs. Per capita consumption is approximately 100 gpcd and has been decreasing over the years. The report only goes down to the County level, so it is difficult to ascertain where the 2070 growth will take place. We assume that most of the growth will occur in the unincorporated areas. The observations from this report are as follows: 1) Following current trends may result in a 100% increase in water demand over 2010. 2) Water 2070 Alternative would result in 27% less development demand. 3) Water 2070 Alternative has a higher density with a resulting decrease in per capita consumption. 4) There would be a slight increase in agricultural demand. 5) Water demand will be greatest in the Central Region. 6) Water 2070 Trend reveals a decrease in agricultural demand due to lost area. 7) The study indicates two alternatives. One, increase supply (alternative water sources, reclaimed water, desalination); or two, reduce demand (through water conservation and increased efficiency), More detailed information is available in the report. We have only provided a brief summary herein. The City of Winter Springs has already implemented reclaimed water alternatives and conservation efforts and seen positive results. City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan Page No. 3 -1 CHAPTER 3 WATER SUPPLY SOURCES AND QUALITY CONSIDERATIONS 3.1 General The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has done considerable work in Seminole County with respect to availability of groundwater for agricultural and municipal uses. Reports have been published by the USGS containing information such as aquifer elevations, depth, thickness, water yield, and water quality generally through investigation of the numerous wells located within the various parts of Seminole County. 3.2 Historical Information 3.2.1 Characteristics of the Floridan Aquifer in Seminole Count /Winter Springs Source Water The Floridan Aquifer is the primary source of potable water for most of north central and northern Florida. This aquifer is a series of limestone formations up to hundreds of feet in thickness, which lie beneath the surficial sediments. The aquifer is recharged by infiltration of rainwater through permeable surface sands into the uppermost limestone formations. Discharge from the aquifer occurs naturally through artesian springs and artificially through wells which penetrate it. Groundwater recharge is a natural occurring step of the Earth's hydrologic cycle. As water is discharged from the aquifers through pumping and seepage, more water is simultaneously replaced through percolation. Recharge is very dependent on local conditions such as soil characteristics, . potentiometric surfaces and precipitation. In general, recharge to the Floridan Aquifer is restricted to areas where the elevation of the water table is greater than the elevation of the potentiometric surface of the confined aquifers. The groundwater recharge potential of the land that constitutes the Winter Springs Service Area is characterized as "poor" by the United States Geological Survey (USGS). The Water Resources Atlas of Florida also identifies this area as a zone with little or no recharge potential. Actually, there are numerous springs in the area that makes this area a natural discharge area. In Seminole County, considerable variation in aquifer yield and water quality is present due primarily to the City of Winter Springs —Water Supply Plan Page No. 3 -2 influence of the St. Johns River, its tributaries, and springs. Areas which are known to exhibit relatively high well yield generally also exhibit superior water quality. This information is contained in "Availability of Ground Water in Seminole County and Vicinity, Florida" by C.H. Tibbals, 1977. It can be seen from the figures in that report that groundwater from the areas near Lake Monroe, Lake Jesup, and the St. Johns River exhibits relatively high levels of chlorides and hardness compared to areas further to the south and west in Seminole County. More recent updates are not available. It is anticipated that the Water 2020 Program by SJRWMD will provide new information. The USGS (Barraclough, 1962) has indicated that long ago the elevation of seawater was as high as 25 feet above the current levels. Many low areas in Seminole County were inundated by seawater during this period and in these areas the seawater infiltrated through the surface sediments into the underlying limestone formations. A distinct correlation has been observed between the 25 -foot topographic contour line and the zone of better quality groundwater within the aquifer. Due to continual recharging of the aquifer by the percolation of rainfall over a long period of time the older, saltier water is believed to have been pushed deeper into the limestone beds. High rates of aquifer withdrawal, i.e., well pumping, in the uppermost limestone formations is believed to cause an upward infiltration of the poorer quality water from the deeper formations below. For this reason, design well pumpage rates must be carefully considered and close monitoring of chloride levels should be conducted by well owners forwells located in areas which are in close proximityto or within the areas of observed poor groundwater quality and well yield. We reviewed the Floridan Aquifer potentiometric contour maps for the Winter Springs supply area and the following information was gathered: Aquifer Year E=levational Range 1954 50 -65 1977 40 -45 1989 35 -50 1992 35 -45 Source Barroclough (USGS) Tibbals (USGS) USGS USGS The data indicates a general decrease of the potentiometric head which reveals a general depletion of water supply. It also helps explain why the well capacities have decreased from their design parameters. As the potentiometric head drops, the well pumps have a higher head condition and, therefore, production drops. City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan Page No. 3 -3 3.2.2 Water Use Caution Area Seminole County has been identified as a Water Use Caution Area (WUCA) by the St, Johns River Water Management District ( SJRWMD). The designation as a WUCA is based on concerns that future groundwater withdrawals from the Upper Floridian Aquifer will reduce the discharge from nearby springs and contribute to migration of high chloride water from the Wekiva River, St. Johns River, the Econlockhatchee River and the Little Econlockhatchee River. While the SJRWMD is currently working on developing strategies to avoid and/or mitigate these anticipated negative impacts, it is clear that the City should consider these concerns in future water supply planning. 3.2.3 Consumptive Use Permit Withdrawal of drinking water from the Florida Aquifer is regulated by the St. Johns River Water Management District ( SJRWMD). This process is known as the Consumptive Use Permit (CUP). A copy of the City of Winter Springs CUP Permit Number 8238 is contained in Appendix A "Consumptive Use Permit ". This permit expires January 12, 2030, 3.3 Water Quality Source Generally, the raw water quality meets the maximum contaminant levels (MCL's) for all currently regulated inorganic and organic contaminants and is good with the exception of high concentrations of hydrogen sulfide, sulfate and chlorides, at specific wells. The City of Winter Springs has experienced problems associated with the corrosiveness of the finished waterwith regard to taste problems, colored water problems, and failure of copper piping in the customer's home. The City, however, has reduced this problem through the addition of corrosion control facilities. A phosphate inhibitor is added to the raw water and provides a "passive" coating on the interior of pipes, thereby reducing the corrosion effect and leaching of metallic constituents (lead and copper). The City of Winter Springs has experienced non - compliance issues with the formations of TTHM's in the drinking water distribution system. This is related to Total Organic Compounds (TOCs) in the raw water and the use of chlorine for disinfection in the treatment process. The City has addressed this issue at WTP 1 with the installation of an IEX system. City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan Page No 3 -4 3.3.1 Raw Water Qualit Raw water quality data from the W inter Springs public water system wells is presented in Appendix B, "Raw Water Quality Data /FDEP 62- 555(5)(a). The water is buffered with moderate alkalinity and hardness, with an average pH of 8.0. The microbial quality of the raw water is good with no evidence of coliform bacteria. The raw water is typical of a Floridan groundwater in all of the groundwater wells. Any new or altered well with a total sulfur concentration greater than 0.3 mg /I requires (under the new regulations) treatment. This requirement may be implemented by FDEP for Winter Springs in the future. High concentrations of this chemical constituent need to be removed from the water prior to the Point -of -Entry (POE) due to the following: • Hydrogen sulfide produces a "rotten egg" odor, thereby creating an aesthetic problem and a deterioration of the public's confidence in the utility's ability to generate a safe and palatable drinking water; and Hydrogen sulfide, present in high concentrations, produces sulfide turbidity problems and water quality concerns, as the City has been experiencing for some time. 3.3.2 Finished Water Quality The finished water quality produced by the Winter Springs PWS meets all State and Federal regulations related to the production of a safe drinking water. The City is currently constructing Ion Exchange facilities for the removal of organic precursors at Water Treatment Plant 1 (WTP 1). The project is described under Chapter 4. As new regulations become effective, the City may be required to make some modifications to the treatment processes at WTP 2 and WTP 3 to meet the MCL's which are currently proposed. At the present time, there are no items of concern and testing has verified that water produced from these two facilities is in compliance. The finished water parameters that present a concern at this time are H2S Turbidity, Total Trihalomethanes (TTHM's), Halo Acetic Acids (HAA's) and Total Organic Carbon (TOG). The finished water quality is presented in Appendix B, "Raw Water Quality Data /FDEP 62- 555(5)(a) ". 3.3.2.1 H2S/Turbidity At the current raw water pH (8.0), equilibrium conditions dictate that the bisulfide form (HS -) is the City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan Page No. 3 -5 dominant species present. Therefore, since H2S is the only species that is volatile, typical aeration processes are not efficient in removing it from the raw water stream unless the pH is adjusted to less than 6.5. To more effectively use the existing system, the raw water pH would have to be lowered and then raised again after aeration. Aeration literature indicates that aeration using the cascade tray process is inefficient in removing high concentrations of H2S because the process does not provide a sufficient air to water ratio. Thus, only a small portion of H2S is removed in the process. The result of this inefficient aeration process is the generation of high turbidities in the ground storage tanks due tc the formation of elemental sulfur, a solid particle, as shown below: The reaction between chlorine and H2S in the ground storage tanks: H2S + C12 s 2 HC1 + so The incomplete oxidation of H2S to elemental sulfur (S°) in the ground storage tanks via its reaction with dissolved oxygen: 2 H2S + 2 Ox = H2SO4 + so The sulfur turbidity problems associated with the finished water is due to the high H2S concentrations in the water and the possible conversion of the H2S to elemental sulfur. The City currently uses chlorine to reduce the H2S problem. This creates other water quality problems. This treatment system is acceptable at this time; however, proposed regulations may require additional treatment. In order to reduce the turbidity at the facilities, reduce the chlorine demand, and reduce the TTHM formation potential, the City will continue evaluations of alternative treatment methodologies that will remove the H2S from the water. 3.3.2.2 Total Organic Carbon (TUC) The TOC contained in a water supply is considered a precursor for the formation of Total Trihalomethanes (TTHM) and Total Halo Acetic Acid (THAA). TOC exists in two basic forms: hydrophobic (water fearing), and hydrophilic (water loving, a.k.a. dissolved). The hydrophobic form is more easily removed. If the source water has a large percentage of dissolved organic carbon, City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan Page No 3 -6 removal will be more difficult and more costly. Removal of TOC would decrease the possibility of forming disinfection byproducts. 3.3.2.3 Total Trihalomethanes (TTHM's) The City of Winter Springs has been sampling and analyzing their distribution systems quarterlyfor TTHM's in accordance with the current state and federal drinking water regulations. The data indicates a trend of increasing TTHM values in the Winter Springs PWS. The data reveals that the problem exists primarily at the WTP1 at this time. The City has implemented a corrective action plan at WTP 1. See Chapter 4. 3.3.2.4 Total Halo Acetic Acid (THAA) Recently, EPA has added sampling for THAA(s) in drinking water systems. The current standard is 63 mg /L THAA. THAA(s) are another disinfection byproduct and are potentially cancer causing. Treatment processes to reduce both TTHM and THAA should be used 3.3.2.5 Lead and Copper Rule LCR The City of Winter Springs was experiencing elevated residual copper concentrations in their distribution system and at customer's taps. Water quality sampling and analyses were performed and a Corrosion Control Desktop Evaluation generated for review and approval by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Corrosion control facilities were constructed and the City began injecting the phosphate inhibitor into the system. The City is currently in compliance with the requirements of the LCR. The high corrosivity of the water is partially due to the dissolved oxygen introduced into the water during aeration. Although the corrosion control inhibitor has decreased the rate of copper corrosion in the system, the water being produced is still on the corrosive side. An effective treatment process that removes the H2S for the water in conjunction with a pH adjustment (both processes employed in CO2 air stripping) could provide the City with more control over the water quality produced as well as the copper corrosion potential within the distribution system and customer's piping. If this type of a system is employed at the City of Winter Springs, then continued use of the phosphate inhibitor will need to be re- evaluated. City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan Page No. 3 -7 3.4 Groundwater Contamination and Land Use An additional consideration in selection of future water supply source locations and considerations for existing well locations is the potential for past and future contamination of the aquifer by organic pesticides, solvents and other hazardous chemicals and the potential for waterquality degradation. Regarding contamination, an uncertainty which exists is how rapidly the groundwater will migrate outward from a contaminated site. Since the direction of groundwater flow is to the northeast toward Lake Jesup in this particular part of the County, it is recommended that any new wells be located upgradient, if possible, from known pesticide application and industrial areas where hazardous chemicals are frequently handled or utilized. Therefore, land use surrounding a water supply site should be a major consideration in selection of new sites and in evaluating the potential for contamination of existing sites. The City should implement a wellhead protection plan and identify all potential sources of contamination for the existing wells. 3.5 Potential Future Sources of Water In general, the groundwater supply is sufficient in both quality and quantity in the Winter Springs area. It is anticipated, based on the population projections and the existing well capacity, that new wells will not be required. Significant changes in the population growth or contamination /quality degradation of existing supplies may necessitate additional supply sources some time in the future. Location of future well sites and use of existing well sites will most likely be restricted in use by potential contamination sources and setback requirements rather than by the quality and quantity of water, although the quality and quantity of water available from any well is always unpredictable. We recommend that any new wells be constructed to produce capacities of between 1200 and 2400 gpm. Larger capacities than 2400 gpm tend to produce lower water quality and excessive drawdown levels. Wells less than 1200 gpm capacity tend not to be economical. The City has a significant residential reclaimed water system, which currently serves 1,720 customers. It is planned by the City to continue expansion of this system. This is a significant alternate source of water and it has been demonstrated that potable water demand can be reduced in Winter Springs by the use of reclaimed water. The City has a permitted secondary non- potable source of water, Lake Jesup, to supplement the reclaimed water supply. All reclaimed water will be fully used and other sources will be used for augmentation to meet the peak demands. City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan Page No. 3 -8 3.6 Current Well Siting Regulations Based on population and flow projections, no additional wells are required to meet future flow demands; however, unanticipated changes may make it necessary to replace or add additional wells as discussed above and there are many factors which must be considered. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) has established certain guidelines for the placement of new wells. Figure 3 -1 illustrates these guidelines. The major consideration in developed areas as related to well placement is the 100 -foot minimum setback to sewer lines, etc, and the 200 -foot minimum setback to retention areas and septic tanks, etc. These become the limiting factor for new well locations and determine minimum size of the site. Each of the Winter Springs plants is surrounded by existing residential development. Locations that could serve as water supply sources are road rights -of -way, power easements, parks, golf courses, baseball field, etc. The locations for several of these areas are relatively long distances from the plant, but there are possibilities in the unlikely event new water supply sources are required. It is best to stay away from commercial areas as numerous contaminants may come from small commercial enterprises such as gas stations and dry cleaners. Additional considerations in selection of future water supply source locations is the potential for past and future contamination of the aquifer by organic pesticides, solvents, and other hazardous chemicals. Final selection of any well site, if needed, must consider surrounding land use. In addition, an investigation should be conducted by a geohydrologist to estimate the recommended well size and depth, pumping capacity, casing length, projected aquifer drawdown, and other site specific considerations to be utilized in final design. The St. Johns River Water Management District should be consulted to obtain their reactions to the well field site and their requirements fora testing program. Test wells may be needed to determine ambient aquifer water quality, aquifer yields, drawdowns, etc., prior to full development of any well site. m NEW DOMESTICOR NEW DOMESTIC OR INDUSTRIAL SEWAGE OR INDUSTRIAL WASTE °cr � N' PERC PONDS OR LAGOONS SPRAYFIELDS a O r O 3 v a Oil ° DAIRY FARMS (HIGH INTENSITY AREAS) uim ? c o r2 v n A� T a o Way 'Zm DD a n N o O N^ a DRAINFIELDS o v o m w m A o o ? c N aNwN W c- � � m O A N 0 Q LU � OZ (D Z o SEPTIC TANKS U) O OR OR OR W.W.T.P:s r� RESTRICTED pl (� PUBLIC ACCESS RECLAIMED WATER MAINS z 71 4 U) 1 O X m C�i M-n mom . 6 O !A c STORAGE LIFT STATIONS m � M r M � M g: / _ � O m m OR PUBLIC ACC�BS —x 'G (fj z � PUBLIC ACCESS SPRAY SITE 0 � w I� 7� RECLAIMED WATER MAINS zz G� In POTABLE ~� MIjVIM ~3E?A WELL �_` OR '0 T_ 2=� RD W 0 STORMWATER C RETENTION PONDS SURFACE WATER W x (o IT City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan Page No. 3 -10 3.7 Water Treatment Recent regulatory trends have resulted in additional and stricter standards for drinking water. As a result of the 1986 Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), EPA has and will continue to establish additional and revised standards. As a result of the additional monitoring and possible treatment requirements and the costs associated with these requirements, no additional water plants should be incorporated into the Winter Springs system. Any additional water plants would increase operational costs and we believe it is more cost effective to improve and expand the existing facilities. Current water treatment provided by the City includes aeration, sedimentation and disinfection. At WTP 1, ion exchange was added. If additional treatment is required at the other two facilities, the costs for operation and implementation increase significantly with each additional plant. The existing plants should be expanded as needed to meet any future demands. As discussed, expansion of the well capacity at any of the plants will not be easy, but well sites can be identified and incorporated into the existing plant raw water supply system. They may just be further away from the plant compared to the existing wells. Expansion of treatment at WTP 2 will not be possible without the reconstruction or repurposing of the recreational area to the east of the site. The Utilities Department would have to find a new home for these recreational facilities in order to provide an expansion at this site. Expansion at WTP 3 will be difficult due to limited space at the existing treatment plant site. We recommend that the City investigate and pursue the purchase of property directly adjacent to Water Plants 3. If any house directly adjacent to the WTP 3 site becomes available for purchase, the City should acquire the property. City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan Page No. 4 -1 CHAPTER 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS 4.1 General The water system consists of three water treatment plants, which serve approximately 13,265 service connections. Based on population data, this yields 2.63 persons per connection. This factor has remained relatively unchanged since the first Master Water Plan for the City of Winter Springs in the early 1990's. The water plants are identified as WTP 1, WTP 2, and WTP 3. Table 4 -1, "Inventory of Existing Water Storage Facilities" through Table 4 -4, "Existing Water Plant Design Capacities" contain a summary of the existing capacities of the wells, storage facilities, and water plants. The water system consists of the following: • Raw water pumping from a groundwater aquifer • Ion Exchange at WTP 1 • Aeration • Chlorination (by concentrated sodium hypochlorite) • Sedimentation (storage) • High service pumping. The City owns, operates and maintains the water treatment facilities and distribution system within its corporate limits. The City serves only minor unincorporated areas. The three water plants are interconnected by numerous water lines and the system operates as one system. 4.2 Water Plants Each plant consists of a raw water supply, ground storage, water treatment including aeration, sedimentation and chlorination, and high service pumping into the distribution system. A brief description of the capacity and the limiting process for each plant is contained below. 4.2.1 WTP 1 WTP 1 is located in the Tuskawilla residential subdivision on Northern Way. The plant has four (4) City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan Page No. 4 -2 wells (5400 gpm), one 500,000 gallon ground storage tank (aerator capability 3800 gpm), one 1,000,000 gallon storage tank (aerator capability 3500 gpm), and three high service pumps - 7000 gpm total; 5500 gpm firm capacity (based on largest pump out of service). WTP 1 has the largest capacity single high service pump installed within the interconnected system and therefore WTP 1 was selected to meet the criteria for the "largest pump out of service ". The plant has some minor room for further expansion. The site is currently under construction. The City is adding an anionic ion exchange (IEX) system for the removal of total organic carbon (TOC) and bromide to limit the formation of THHMs after chlorination in the final drinking water of the community. Also, the IEX system is equipped with an aeration system to promote and enhance the removal of hydrogen sulfide (H2S). The IEX system will be regenerated by the use of salt with the waste product (spent regenerate) going to the East Water Reclamation Facility. The selection of this IEX was based on a literature study and pilot testing at WTP 1. The selection process is documented in "City of Winter Springs WTP 1 Water Facilities Plan ", September 2095. WTP 1 improvements consist of: 1) Three 900 gpm (rated flow- through capacity) anionic ion - exchange pressure vessel units. 2) Piping configuration to blend IEX treated water with raw well water to meet disinfection by- products (DBP) goals prior to chlorination. Based on pilot testing, a 50 -50 blend is expected. 3) New chlorination equipment (chemical storage and pumping). 4) Chemical storage building (IEX process brine tanks, corrosion control chemical, sodium hypochlorite, chemical feed pumps, spill containment and spent regenerate waste tanks). 5) New metering equipment. 6) New 750 Kw generator and fuel storage. 7) New electrical building for the entire facility. 8) New VFDs for the high service pumps. 9) New well pump #4. 10) New high service pumps (under separate contract). The new high service pumping capacities are used in this report. 4.2.2 WTP 2 WTP 2 is located on Sheoah Boulevard and is surrounded by development on all sides (Highlands subdivision). WTP 2 provides only chlorination (liquid sodium hypochlorite) as treatment. The plant has some minor room for further expansion. It is not possible to construct another ground storage tank at this site. The plant includes two wells (2200 gpm); one onsite and one offsite; one 500,000 City of Winter Springs —Water Supply Plan Page No 4 -3 gallon ground storage tank (3800 gpm of aerator capacity); and three high service pumps (4350 gpm). 4.2.3 WTP 3 WTP 3 is located on Bahama Road. WTP 3 provides only chlorination (liquid sodium hypochlorite) as treatment. The plant consists of two wells (3500 gpm), one 500,000 gallon ground storage tank (aeration 3800 gpm), and three high service pumps (3100 gpm). The plant has some minor room for further expansion. It is not possible to construct another ground storage tank at this site 4.3 Distribution System Figure 4 -1, "Water Distribution System Map" shows the existing distribution system and is included in the map pocket at the end of this study. The system is adequately looped and consists of water mains up to sixteen (16) inches in diameter. All areas of the City are properly served and an expansion of the water distribution system is not required nor is an expansion needed for projected future growth. The water mains consist of various materials: ductile iron pipe, polyvinyl/chloride (PVC), galvanized iron pipe (minimal amounts), asbestos cement pipe (minimal amounts), high density polyethylene (HDPE) pipe (minimal amounts) and cast iron pipe (minimal amounts). A hydraulic analysis was not performed for this study. The City has not experienced any distribution system pressure or quantity /flow problems. The fire department routinely performs hydrant flow tests and no issues have been reported. An analysis was performed several years ago for the FDEP concerning back -up capabilities and no deficiencies were observed in the computer model of the distribution system model. The City has the capability to serve the east side from the west plants (and vice versa) if any one water treatment plant is rendered inoperable. The water distribution system is able to meet FDEP minimum pressure and flow criteria during any such outage, emergency or catastrophe. In addition, the City has interconnects with other agencies for emergency water supply. `xr p nNOQ 88��1 c7 3 a A N v Dj —1 O m C� vm �m A vm ml T p �A m C m m 0 m m c O Z -G m m m iLJ r� - - -- -. - - -- -- -- - -- '2"WATERMAIN 3" WATER MAIN 4° WATER MAIN fl 6" WATER MAIN m F F I I s J i City of Winter Springs -- Water Supply Plan Page No. 4 -5 TABLE 4 -1 INVENTORY OF EXISTING WATER STORAGE FACILTIES (ALL GROUND STORAGE) Location Capacity (gal) Aerator Capacity {gpm) 500,000 000,000 This pump is new (April 2017). The pump TDH is 79 feet. **Construction well log value shown. Recent video (March 2C 17) reveals a depth of 265 feet. TABLE INVENTORY OF EXISTING WELLS T_ Well Diameter Well • Well Casing Pump Well Casing Capacity Depth Depth Motor Location • (gPm) L (ft-)--J— (ft-) H.P. Active Permit_ WTP 1 1 E 12 1200 350 105 30 Yes Yes 2E 12 2000 290 119 50 Yes Yes 3E 12 2000 295 190 50 Yes Yes 4E 16 1200* 350 ** 130 40* Yes Yes WTP2 3W 12 1100 491 123 30 Yes Yes 6W 12 1200 400 220 30 Yes Yes WTP3 4W 12 1100 423 96 30 Yes Yes 5W 20 1800 440 200 50 Yes Yes This pump is new (April 2017). The pump TDH is 79 feet. **Construction well log value shown. Recent video (March 2C 17) reveals a depth of 265 feet. City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan Page No. 4 -6 *Direct drive (LP gas) on Pump #3 and generator connection at Well #3. Total Pump output is 16,300; (12,800 is based on largest pump out of service). The new high service pumps at WTP 1 will be installed in the summer of 2017. The new 750 Kw generator was installed in March 2017. City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan Page No. 4 -7 WTP1 6400 1 9.2 1 9000 1 13.0 1 500,000 1 7300 750 Kw WTP2 2300 3.3 4300 6.3 500,000 3800 NIA WTP3 2900 4.2 3000 4.5 1,500,000 3800 300 Kw TOTAL 11,600 (9600)'' 16.7 (13.8)(') 16,300 (12,800)(1) 23.5 (18.4)(1) 2,500,000 14,900 Notes: 1. Pumping capacity based on largest unit in the system out of service. 2. WTP 2 has a direct drive engine on Pump 3 and a portable generator connection on Well #3. 3. 300 Kw generator at WTP3 is shared with L.S. 7. 4.4 Chlorination /Disinfection The Winter Springs water facilities use sodium hypochlorite (a.k.a, concentrated bleach) at all facilities to disinfect the raw water withdrawn from the aquifer. 4.5 Corrosion Control The treatment facilities utilize an ortho - polyphosphate inhibitor and pumping system to reduce the corrosion potential of the water and meet the requirements of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Lead and Copper Rule (LCR). The inhibitor is injected into each one of the raw water conveyance lines based on the flow of the well. The storage tank provides the detention time and a passive coating is formed on the inside of the distribution system piping. rat r u :� �' '.fir• , :. + �` �. /f��� mp � - WELL #2E n Inv, ! LAKE MARIA lK ( . K F'„" - t a .g -� �" 1- -� 1 •,�';a. s. f "'i N r WELL# 4E .,► � �°=` �' t X (� it ;4A WELL #tE `t WELL SE A. `\ FACILITIES`+ _¢ \ UNDER CONSTRUCTION - 0.5 MG Ott• r - y;°�a ...� `.f6' 1 MG PLEASANT GROVE OR.' Ilk oL w. a Y y��L h r r73 Designed by: TMZ Date: 401W17 - Flan Prepared ny, A Full - -FVICe A & E Firm DLrices In: KPH, Me WTP # 1 LOCATION Figure No. Drawn by: PD Job No. W04174 ' •Florida 1117 e8nhmsdn7..25Laodo,FL NOTE: 2016/2017 IMPROVEMENTS ARE NOT SHOWN Checked b TMZ Angineers l r E! P . Puerto Rico 3=801 Ph: 407.425.0982 Y File: FIGURE Engineers Planners Licenses: ��� Environmental Structural •Connecticut Eng. c.C1.A. Nc.32+6 Approved by: TMZ 4-2 Maryland sarveyLB.Nd.1+4A Landscape Architects Surveyors ry Arch. LI.. NO. AA280092G WINTER SPRINGS WATER SUPPLY PLAN Scale, t° =100' zo(s www.cphcorp.eom TrafficlTrensportatioN •Texas rcLndscp. Lic. N.. LC9000298 Page 4 -8 - � - ire.s ay Av 1i •� _ -a r � � _ „ n - r frf Y Es � ra '' r x . •. 3 y � � � 7> _t : � `• _ E y1 RASE OR .s• " �,_ stj"'' 4 � �s, T_ 3 , WELL #8W ,r e a .i r.Pr —.41 TAM CT. AK � d +1 WELL #3W �;.`a , 4. 0.5 MG . m y N. - r ,r ` ar _ h, d. f 1 Designed by: Drawn by: TMZ PD Date: 4!4!2017 - A Fu11 Service A & E Firm Job No. W04174 9 Architects M f E! P File: FIGURE En Ineera Planners EnwrenmrJflt SuIve om 4-3 Lanr� caps Archpecta Surveyors © 2015 larww.cphcorp.com TrefFlclTrapsporfatFon Offices In: • Florida • PUerfO RICO . Connecticut • Ma land +Texas Plan Prepay d ay. CPH, Inc. WTP # 2 LOCATION Figure No. �_3 Page 4 -9 11n a. aotansan at. - Od,hde, Fl. X1607 Ph'. 40Y.425.04iz G. A Sh c. Ho AA260 928 L,d.cp, U.. Ho. L00000293 Checked by: y TMZ Approved by: TMZ WINTER SPRINGS WATER SUPPLY PLAN Scale " = 106' Cat dil IL i k �• {`:Ap: . * ,, qe •iF t +-- ��J�A7 `,r s r WELL 45w' ��ey qty � �� ';4 -, z , 4a�T. . c,t` � t �..��e` +nc� q � ��;� n �1_ •!r � � r. Yr � .''`•'+ �..s � a^' 3 ,i, - ,, ?� `,5 .� `„R� � �� .5�, tl .c 45c~ F �.•`�E �,y ;?%' .WELL # 4W .4 - p q. S ®- kAMA R airs -��` � �s 't J l:t � ra. - �' r•r '. �'. d. 1 law o awn Designed by: TMZ Date: 4141201 t Plan Prcparee By: A Full Service A & E Firm offices In: CPH. Inc. Figure No. Drawn by: PD Joh No. W04174 A • Florida 1111 E. Robinson 61.- Oeaneq rl. WTP # 3 LOCATION Checked b TMZ nrchnects M r e 1 P 31961 Ph: 407.923.0431 • Puerto Rico y: File' FIGURE Engineers Planners LO.A N o •Con necticot Eng. C.O.A. N. 1116 — Approved by. TMZ 4 -4 dsv p Archie Struckural a Ma land aarv• LB. No. 7147 Landscape Architects Surveyor' ry Arch. Lla. No. AA269a928 WINTER SPRINGS WATER SUPPLY PLAN Af 4 Scale: 1"= 100' © 2015 1AIWwxphCOfp.6om TmffidTransportation ' Texas Lntlscp. Ltc Ne. LCWUQ219 Paqe 4 -10 City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan Page No. 4 -11 4.6 Reclaimed Water Suppiiy There are four (4) facilities that can supply reclaimed water and/or augmentation water into the reclaimed water distribution system. They are: 4.6.1 Lake Jesup Augmentation The Lake Jesup Augmentation Supply site is part of the City of Winter Springs CUP and is located on the south shore of Lake Jesup directly west and adjacent to the Central Winds Park facilities. This facility predominantly will supply flow to the Central Winds Park irrigation system during peak demand periods as it is the closest user to the source. The Lake Jesup Augmentation Supply consists of an intake structure which extends into Lake Jesup as the water source; an intake pumping system that feeds into a filtration system; a 250,000 gallon storage tank; a 500 gpm jockey high service pump for low flows; and two (2) - 1500 gpm high service pumps for larger demands. The site plan is shown in Figure 4 -5. 4.6.2 West WRF Reclaimed Water The West WRF Reclaimed Water supply is located at the West Water Reclamation Facility north of SR 434 on Casselberry Lane. This wastewater treatment facility has a current flow of approximately 1 MGD AADF. The West WRF produces Public Access quality reclaimed water and is permitted by FDEP. It is currently permitted for 2.012 MGD of capacity. It predominantly supplies reclaimed water to the western part of the City. The reclaimed facilities include: a 300 gpm (20 Hp) jockey pump; two (2) — 650 gpm (40 Hp) high service pumps; two (2) — 950 GPM (60 Hp) high service pumps; and, a 2.0 MG ground storage tank The electrical system for the pumps and controls are provided from the operations building. The West WRF has a generator for emergency power back -up. The site plan is shown in Figure 4 -6. 4.6.3 East WRF Reclaimed Water The East WRF Reclaimed Water supply is located at the East Water Reclamation Facility south of Winter Springs Boulevard and west of Sam Smith Park. This wastewater treatment facility has a current flow of approximately 1 MGD AADF. The West WRF produces Public Access quality reclaimed water and is permitted by FDEP. It is currently permitted for 2.2 MGD of capacity. It predominantly supplies reclaimed water to the eastern part of the City. City of Winter Springs— Water Supply Plan Page No. 4 -12 The reclaimed facilities include: a 500 gpm (30 Hp) jockey pump; two (2) — 1200 gpm (75 Hp) high service pumps; one (1) -- 1800 GPM (100 Hp) high service pump; and, a 3.0 MG ground storage tank The electrical system for the pumps and controls are provided from the separate electrical operations building next to the pumps and the ground storage tank. The East W RF has a generator for emergency power back -up. The site plan is shown in Figure 4 -7. 4,6.4 Oak Forest Reclaimed Water Storage and Pumping The Oak Forest Reclaimed Water Storage and Pumping facility is located to the west of the Oak Forest subdivision and north of the Oak Forest non - public access spray irrigation site. This facility can receive flow from all three water supply sites. It's purpose is to provide additional storage volumes during low demand periods and to feed the stored reclaimed water back into the distribution system during peak demand periods to any sector of the City due to the centralized location. The storage tank can be filled during off peak times (10 AM to 4 PM) when irrigation is prohibited by regulations. This is the time that is restricted by SJRWMD for water conservation purposes. During the rest of the day, it can feed water into the reclaimed water distribution system as a secondary supply source as needed. It can also feed water to the other non - public access facilities that surround the site. The site plan is shown in Figure 4 -8. City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan Page No. 4 -13 Lake Jesup 41 Fairbanks Morse 10D 500 40 All VFD #2 Fairbanks Morse 121 1500 125 98 psi #3 Fairbanks Morse 121 1500 125 228' Oak Forest #1 Ideal #2 Ideal #3 Ideal #4 Future #5 Future EWRF u 1DRC54 500 50 All VFD 12RDS150 1500 100 80 psi 12RDS150 1500 100 185' 41 I Fairbanks Morse 1 * I 500 1 30 #3 Fairbanks Morse 1200 75 Fairbanks Morse 1200 75 #4 1800 100 Fairbanks Morse #1 Ingersoll Rand 650 40 #2 Deming 650 40 #3 Deming 950 60 #4 Deming 950 60 Jockey #5 Ingersoll Rand 300 20 All VFD Except jockey pump All VFD Total Pump output is 15,200 gpm; (13,400 gpm with the largest pump out of service ). * Model Number Unknown INTAKE STRUCTURE=, AWL s. K ..'k�Jt /'� _�� � -. Et � � fie• �. ►+ 4 - iA- + = 1 PUMPS STORAGL ' a 0.25 MG FILTERS b STONE HARBOUR Ro( V r� l d8 t � } t LAKE JESUP AUGMENTATION WATER FACILITY WINTER SPRINGS WATER SUPPLY PLAN Figure No. Page 4 -14 t � y�V -�q �� � � ;tea` l.t �i ♦ ,, U Designed by: TMZ Date: 412012 0 1 7 A Full Serv/ce A & E Firm Offices In- •Florida • Puerto Rico • Connecticut •Maryland •Texas Plan Prepared Hy: CPH, Inc. Drawn by: PD Job NC.W04774 11ti E. Robinso"i- Cnanno, Fl. 32801 Ph: 407.425.0452 1-1— : Eng. OA. No. 3215 Survey L9. No.714 nd-p. He. LCOO 828 Lntlscp. nc. No. A26003ye6 Checked by: TMZ Architects M I E f P File: FIGURE Engineers planners Environmental Structwal 4 -5 Landscape Architects Surveyors WWW.0 hcor .com ©21715 p p T cAranepartallon Approved by: TMZ Scale: 1 ° = 100' d8 t � } t LAKE JESUP AUGMENTATION WATER FACILITY WINTER SPRINGS WATER SUPPLY PLAN Figure No. Page 4 -14 OPERATIONS BLDG.. 1, Vold I ' ;'� ��`'�'' � `- �` � ��• a r�.a � .F _ `�"` -.- n ° '3 4 - }•' -► _ REJECT WATER POND tp i ' s a T y s • • � ��' �'� �,� ^� _ - £�E � �i �� � � \ , .fie � .f, Designed by: TMZ Date: 5!212017 Offices In: Plan Prepared By: A Fu1► Service A & E Firm CPH. Inc. Drawn by: PD Job No. W04174 • Florida 1n E. 801 Ph: 407A25.0452 SL- odarao, rL WEST WRF RECLAIMED WATER Archlfects M d E I P . puerto Rico 32801 Ph:4o7.426.0462 Checked by: TMZ File: FIGURE Englneers Planners . Gonnecticut LPL A. No Approved by: TMZ 4 -6 Enylronmental Structural Eng. C.O. A. NO. ]215 Landscape Architects surveyors •Maryland Survey L.B.No.7143 WINTER SPRINGS WATER SUPPLY PLAN Scale: V= 100' Q 2015 www.cpfieorp,pom Traffic)Transportation • Texas Arch. Lic. No. AA26ao926 Lnd.p. Lia. Na. LOD000298 T 51 R T � Y Sy, S Figure No. Aj-6 Page 4 -15 a `n . � � eta: i � � eh rs'`� -. � .�. � �> -. ♦ , 0.f r + t v lk VI) Al Pt lit U tom... k h ' k � �+� ' �� R � fit•.. - �..a ;<..` F • 41 ,. - " V';< OPERATIONS BLDG � , v� } � i�•.� i`' y� �t � i4. 4V x '+�. X41' _ •e :�•, � -ir T ;�, '4� .�#�= rrc��,,: -.. J � -,.{� mil. # ��`'� T. i -k g� { ' s t 4 RECLAIMED ± 1 EAST WIRE FACILITIES ` STORAGE RECLAIMED PUMPING SYSTEM s s REJECT WATER PON❑ Designed by: TMZ Date: 512!2017 Office-9 In: Plan Preps "d sy: A Full Service A & E Firm CPM. Inc Figure No. Drawn by: PD Job No. W04174 •Florida 1117 E2801 Phon 407A25 0452 EAST WRF RECLAIMED WATER 4-7 Architects MlE1P ,Puerto Rico 32801 Ph- 4tl].d250l7Z Checked by: TMZ File: FIGVRE Engineers PEanners Licenses: Environmental Structural Connecticut Eng. C.D.A. No. 7215 Approved by: TMZ 4-7 .Maryland snryeyLs- NO,11d7 WINTER SPRINGS WATER SUPPLY PLAN Landscape Architects Surveyors Anon, Lk. No. AA2600926 Scale 1 "= 100' © 2016 www.cpheorp.com TralFclTransportation • Texas Lndscp.Llc. No. LC0000290 Page 4 -16 a >f , • Y At , rc -, *0 wy r _ 7 +� h1 #4 Ilk-.� +'r _ RECLAIM Ll RECLAIMED PUMPING SYSTEM STORAGE."? - - a.,, :..' POWER - •*` EASEMENT +' - �.. IL - • a a c y i OPERATIONS 6LpG, M1, .wy ilk 4 ��5tt m Y LM fit �J a j Designed by: TMZ Date: 5!272017 . Plan Prepared by - A Full Service A & E Firm orr�e5 In: CPH. Inc. Figure No. Drawn by: PD Job No. W04174 •Florida 1117 E. Ronm +oaSt. - od -do,F1 OAK FOREST RECLAIMED STORAGE AND PUMPING j/ Architects M I E l P . Puerto Rico 32301 M" 4e7.426A402 Checked by: TMZ File: FIGURE Engineers Planners .Connecticut Licenses: Approved b TMZ 48 Emironmantal Structural Eng. C.O.A. Nn. 0213 �� Y Maryland su L.a,Nn.7143 Landscape Architects Surveyors ry A.h. Li. No. AA2000eM WINTER SPRINGS WATER SUPPLY PLAN Scale: 1" =140' ©2015 www.ephcorp.com Tra(ficrtransportation •Texas LAdmp. Uc. No. LC0000299 Page 4 -17 City of Winter Springs — Water Supply plan Pa e No. 5 -1 CHAPTER 5 POPULATION, WATER FLOWS AND SERVICE AREA 5.1 Population and Future Land Use Population data and projections were obtained from the City of Winter Springs. These projections are based on a combination of sources: the current St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) Consumptive Use Permit (CUP) application; actual demand data based on FDEP filings; and, US census data. The data is shown in Table 5 -1, "Existing Service Area Population Projections ". In addition, we verified /compared the current Winter Springs population data with known historical information for the City of Winter Springs and the Planning Department records for "Build -out" of the City of Winter Springs within the existing corporate limits. This procedure was coordinated with the City of Winter Springs Utility Department and the Planning and Development Department to arrive at a result that was reasonable and acceptable for the long -range planning needs of the utility and the City. We have projected population growth based on the current available data, Table 5 -1, "Existing Service Area Population Projections', and it is shown in Table 5- 6, "Historical Data and Projected Population and Potable Water Demand ". Winter Springs population projection data is lower than the 2015 CFW I RWSP data for the years of 2025 through 2035. The City of Winter Springs population projections herein are based on specific local land use data for each parcel of land within the City Limits and projected "build -out" based on the land use as described above. The total growth projected for the service area is 2160 people for the 23 -year period from 2017 through 2040. This growth is a function of the build -out planning data which is based on the zoning maps and each available parcel of land. This is a growth rate of approximately 6 percent for the 23- year planning period. Most of the available land is occupied within the City limits. Changes would result if areas were to be rezoned and re- developed. We are unaware of any such action at this time. If a significant change in population projections occurs due to changes in development, the proposed water system improvements must be reevaluated. City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan Page No 5 -2 Source: City of Winter Springs Census data and property build -out calculations. 5.2 Demand for Water Section 6 discusses the criteria utilized in the projection of future water demands. The water demands and peaking factors are summarized in Table 5 -2, "Summary of Demands and Peaking Factors ". From review of the historical data presented in Table 5 -6, "Historical Data and Projected Population and Potable Water Demand ", an average daily use of approximately 100 gallons per capita per day (GPCD) was evident. Based on seven (7) years of historical records, usage has declining moderately. The City activated a reuse system which allows customers to switch to this for irrigation demand and encourages conservation. We believe that these efforts have "paid -off' and reduced the consumption to 100 gpcd. It should be noted that this water consumption rate is not just the quantity of water that an average person uses daily, but it also includes commercial, industrial water usage and irrigation with potable water. The projected average day demand for the City of Winter Springs water system through the year 2035 is provided in Table 5 -3, "Projected Water Demands in MGD ". It can be seen from the table that average daily demand for the existing service area will reach 3.72 million gallons per day by the year 2035. The 2015 CFW I RWSP reported a gpcd of 115 for Winter Springs. The 2015 CFW I RWSP data is reportedly based on "gross" consumption where all consumption is included (not just residential, aka population). Winter Springs has very few users in the other categories, so it made sense to report the "gross" condition. We used the total gallons pumped per FDEP MOR records and divided this value by the population. It should be noted that the gpcd in Winter Springs is trending downward due to conservation efforts and the use of reclaimed water. Our number does not include reclaimed consumption. City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan Page No. 5 -3 Note: These values above include all commercial /industrial, water utility and other uses. It is based on the total amount of water used. PROJECTE TABLE ■ WATER 5-3 DEMANDS IN MGD i r 2040 Po ulation 35,389 35,989 36,589 37,189 37,789 Average Daily 3.54 3.60 3.66 3.72 3.78 Flow Max. Day 7.08 7.20 7.32 7.44 7.56 Peak Hour 10.62 10.8 1 11.0 11.2 11.3 City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan Page No. 5 -4 Fire flow requirements are based on the method presented in Section 6 and are provided in Table 5 -4, "Fire Flow Requirements ". :i 11 41. v G 1 4 v 2020 35,389 5710 10 1,250 2025 35,989 5750 10 1,250 2030 36,589 5800 10 1,250 2035 37,189 5840 10 1,250 2040 37,789 5880 10 1 ,250 (1) Based on National Board Recommendations. This is for high service and distribution capability. City Code is 550 gpm for residential and 1250 gpm for commercial industrial. (1) High Service and Distribution design criteria. City of Winter Springs - Water Supply Plan Page No. 5 -5 Notes: "Capacity AADF" is the permitted CUP Value, not plant capacity. CUP issued January 25, 2010 and expires on January 12, 2030. Capacity held for 2035 and 2040. Demand AADF includes all users and uses. Demand 2017 thru 2040 is based on 100 gpcd (five year average. Historical Population Data (2001 -2016) is based on data provided by the City. Years 2000, 2010 and 2015 populations are from US Census data for the City of Winter Springs. Per Capita values are based on the total water pumped and /or projected divided by the population. 5.3 Well Field Restrictions The January 2010 Consumptive Use Permit (CUP) is included at the back of this document as Appendix A. It has restrictions for each wellfield (based on water plant location). a w'}J' }yT v1 2000 31,666 2010 33,282 197 4.52 0.55 119 2011 33,583 3.88 4.63 0.75 115 2012 33,853 3.66 4.64 0.98 108 2013 34,183 3.56 4.70 1.14 104 2014 34,483 3.20 4.58 1.38 93 106 2015 34,789 146 4.56 1.10 100 102 2016 34,909 3.66 4.54 0.88 105 100 2017 35,029 3.50 4,46 0.96 100 2018 35,149 3.51 4,37 0.86 100 2019 35,267 3.53 4.28 0.75 100 2020 35,389 3.54 4.15 0.61 100 2025 35,989 3.60 4.14 0.54 100 2030 36,589 3.66 4.14 0.48 100 2035 37,189 3.72 4.14 0.42 100 2040 37,789 178 4.14 0.36 100 Notes: "Capacity AADF" is the permitted CUP Value, not plant capacity. CUP issued January 25, 2010 and expires on January 12, 2030. Capacity held for 2035 and 2040. Demand AADF includes all users and uses. Demand 2017 thru 2040 is based on 100 gpcd (five year average. Historical Population Data (2001 -2016) is based on data provided by the City. Years 2000, 2010 and 2015 populations are from US Census data for the City of Winter Springs. Per Capita values are based on the total water pumped and /or projected divided by the population. 5.3 Well Field Restrictions The January 2010 Consumptive Use Permit (CUP) is included at the back of this document as Appendix A. It has restrictions for each wellfield (based on water plant location). City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan Page No. 5 -6 We quote the following information from the 2010 CUP: "However, for each wellfield, the maximum annual groundwater withdrawal must not exceed: A) WTP 1 — 1,514.75 million gallons (3.41 MGD average) B) WTP 2 — 1,514.75 million gallons (0.822 MGD average) C) WTP 3 — 1,514.75 million gallons (1.61) MGD average 5.4 Wastewater Reuse Program The City has implemented a wastewater reuse program which uses the effluent from the two Winter Springs Water Reclamation Facilities to irrigate the Tuscawilla Golf Course and over 1720 residential sites. The reuse system reduces the per capita water demands through the use of reclaimed water for irrigation of residential areas, commercial and industrial uses and other sub - potable purposes. The St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRW MD) is increasingly requiring public water suppliers to implement methods of wastewater reuse to reduce groundwater withdrawals from the aquifer and the existing system will benefit the City when re- applying for a new Consumptive Use Permit. The per capita demand for potable water have been reduced over time as shown in Table 5- 6, "Historical and Projected Population and Potable Water Demand ". We believe that this is due in part to the continued use of the City's reuse. The CUP has allocated average daily and maximum annual withdrawals from Lake Jesup. These are shown in Table 5 -7, "Augmentation Withdrawals Allowed ". 5.5 Service Area Growth The City of Winter Springs is highly developed and is surrounded by other highly developed areas. To the West of U.S. 17 -92 is the Longwood service area; to the South is the Casselberry and Seminole County service areas; to the Southwest is the Oviedo service area; and to the North is Lake Jesup. The Winter Springs City limits touch up against the City limits of other communities and there are limited opportunities for service area growth. Whatever growth that will occur, will be in -fill at higher densities or smaller parcels of vacant land that will be developed. No potable water service area growth is anticipated for the planning period. No reclaimed water service area growth is anticipated. City of Winter Springs - Water Supply Plan Page No. 5 -7 TABLE AUGMENTATION a ALLOWED Population , (CUP) 2014 34,483 554.80 1.52 2015 34,789 562.10 1.54 2016 34,909 605.90 1.66 2017 34,029 657.00 1.80 2018 35,149 704.45 1.93 2019 35,267 762.85 2.09 2020 35,389 813.95 2.23 2021 839.50 2.30 2022 876.00 2.40 2023 901.55 2.47 2024 908.85 2.49 2025 35,989 919.80 2.52 2026 941.70 2.58 2027 956.30 2.62 2028 981.85 2.69 2029 996.45 2.73 2030 36,589 2035 2040 *CUP issued January 25, 2010 and expires on January 12, 2030. The augmentation water from Lake Jesup is part of the potable water CUP. The two items are contained in the CUP. 5.6 SJRWMD Water Use and Population Data The following information contained herein is from "2015 Survey of Estimated Annual Water Use for St. Johns Water Management District, Technical Fact Sheet SJ2016 -FS3." Public supply water use has seen the following: 1) Public supply water use represents 54% of the total water use in the District. 2) Since 1978, the population increased 50% more than public supply water use. 3) Between 2011 and 2015, public supply water use decreased 3% (from 565.50 million gallons per day (mgd) to 549.26 mgd), while the population increased 2 %. The public water City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan _Page No 5 -8 supply use trend from 2011 was a decreasing demand through 2014. 4) Public supply water use in 2015 increased by 5% from 2014. 5) Per capita demand was at its lowest in 2013 -2014. Per capita demand was approximately 125 gpcd averaged over the entire district. From this data, we can surmise that public supply water demand, on a per capita basis, is decreasing in the entire District, not just in Winter Springs.. City of Winter S rings — Water Supply Plan Page No. 6 -1 CHAPTER 6 DESIGN CRITERIA 6.1 General In order to evaluate the adequacy of the various components of the existing water supply and treatment system and to provide a basis for sizing new elements of the system, it is necessary to establish the appropriate design criteria. Population and corresponding water demand rates are the most important factors in the determination of the need for additional supply and treatment facilities. Land use considerations are also important with respect to sizing new improvements to the water distribution system. Since the basis for most of the criteria discussed below is observed or projected water demand, historical rates of water usage must first be analyzed to establish appropriate demand factors. 6.2 Historical Water Demands Water demands are typically expressed in terms of four conditions: • Average Day Demand (ADD) is the total water consumed during a calendar year divided by 365 days. Flow rates vary from day to day and even seasonally. The average day demand rate was determined from the City's historical monthly Water Plant reports. Average day demand is not generally used as a direct criterion for any component in water systems. It is the basis from which other, more significant criteria are determined. • Maximum Day Demand (MDD) is the amount of water delivered by the City system during the 24 -hour period of maximum demand during the year. Based on information provided by the City, the maximum day demand factor ranged from 1.70 to 2.02 and provides an average ratio of 1.85 times the AADF for a five -year period. The ratio of maximum day demand to average day demand is known as the "maximum day demand factor" and is normally 2.0 to 3.0. In simplest terms, it means that on the day of maximum delivery during the year, approximately two to three times as much water is delivered as on the average day during the year. For Winter Springs the factor will be established as 2.0. City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan Page No. 6 -2 + Peak Hour Demand (PHD) is the maximum flow that must be supplied during the hour of greatest water use. The "peak hour factor" is the factor which indicates the rate of water used during a single hour of peak demand in comparison to the rate of water used in an average hour. Plant records provide limited data to determine the peak hour demand. Based on the data available and in conjunction with published guidelines, the factor for peak hour flow rate will be established at 3.0 times the average day demand. (Normal range is 3.0 to 4.5.) • Fire Flow is the flow rate of water required to fight a major fire. The required fire flow capacity depends on many factors including population, type of facility being protected, type of construction, value of improvements, level of protection desired, etc. The National Board of Fire Underwriters have adopted a formula for relating required fire flow to population as follows: Required Fire Flow in GPM = (10200) (1- 0.01 -\iP) Where P = Population in Thousands Table 5 -4, "Fire Flow Requirements" shows the fire flow requirements that are based on this formula. Tables 5 -6, "Historical Data and Projected Population and Potable Water Demand' summarizes the historical and projected water consumption data. Table 5 -6, "Historical Data and Projected Population and Potable Water Demand" is based on plant flow records from January 2010 to December 2016, Table 5 -6, "Historical Data and Projected Population and Potable Water Demand" also shows the SJRWMD Consumptive Use Permit data in comparison to actual consumption values. 6.3 Supply and Treatment System Criteria The Central District office of FDEP has established a method for determining the capacity of a water treatment plant. The FDEP criteria gives methods for calculating plant capacity through the amount of ground storage, high service pumping, aeration, and raw water supply available. The limiting component of the system dictates the rated capacity of the plant. The FDEP criterion is summarized in Table 6 -1, "Summary of Evaluation Criteria for Potable Water Facilities" along with other respected sources. City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan Page No. 6 -3 TABLE 6 -1 SUMMARY OF EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR POTABLE WATER FACILITIES DemandsiFlows • Maximum Day Demand (MDD) = Average Daily Demand (ADD) x Maximum Day Peak Factor (i.e., ADD x 2.00) • Peak Hour Demand (PHD) = ADD x Peale Hour Factor (PHF) (i.e., ADD x 3.00) • Fire Flow for Residential Areas = 550 GPM • Fire Flow for Commercial Areas = 1,250 GPM Wells FDEP Criteria - Rule 62- 555.315 (3) states: The total well capacity connected to a water system using only ground water shall equal at least the system's design maximum -day water demand (including design fire -flow demand if fire protection is being provided). In addition ... the total well capacity with the largest producing well out of operation shall equal at least the design average daily water demand, and preferably the design maximum -day water demand, for the system... • Condition 1: The total well capacity shall equal or exceed the MDD (including design fire flow demand). ® Condition 2: With the largest well out of service, total well capacity shall equal or exceed the ADD, preferably the MDD. Conventional Aeration • The capacity of the aeration system shall be equal to or greater than the MDD, Forced Draft Aeration • The capacity of the system shall allow delivery of the ADD with the largest treatment unit out of service. Transfer Pumping • The pumping system shall be capable of delivering MDD with the largest pumping unit out of service (10 State Standards). Chemical Storage and Feed Systems • Storage tanks shall provide at least 30 days of storage at ADD conditions (10 State Standards). • Backup chemical feed pumps shall be provided to allow delivery of the design feed rates with the largest unit out of service (10 State Standards). City of Winter Springs= Water Supply Plan Page No. 6 -4 Table 6 -1, continued: Finished Water Storage Rule 62- 555.320 (19) states... This subsection addresses finished -water storage capacity necessary for operational equalization to meet peak water demand. (If fire protection is being provided, additional finished- wafer storage capacity shall be provided as necessary to meet the design fire -flow rate for the design fire -flow duration.) The finished -water storage capacity necessary to meet the peak water demand for a consecutive system may be provided by the consecutive system or by a wholesale system delivering water to the consecutive system. (a) Except as noted in paragraph (b) below, the total useful finished -water storage capacity (excluding any storage capacity for fire protection) connected to a water system shall at least equal 25 percent of the system's maximum -day water demand, excluding any design fire -flow demand. Recommended Criteria: Equalization Storage: 25% of MDD or volume based on mass diagram analysis (FAC 62 -555). • Contingency Storage: Estimated at 15% based on an opinion of system reliability and the level of uncertainty regarding system behavior (AWWA M -32). High Service Pumping FDEP Criteria - Rule 62- 555.320 (15) states: For purposes of this subsection, well pump installations shall be considered high- service pumping stations if the well pumps serve as high - service pumps. (a) Unless elevated finished - drinking -water storage is provided, the total capacity of all high - service pumping stations connected to a water system, or the capacity of a booster pumping station, shall be sufficient to: 1. Meet at least the water system's, or the booster station service area's, peak -hour water demand (and if fire protection is being provided, meet at least the watersystem's, orthe booster station service area's, design fire -flow rate plus a background water demand equivalent to the maximum -day demand other than fire -flow demand); and 2. Maintain a minimum gauge pressure of 20 pounds per square inch throughout the water system's, or the booster station service area's, distribution system up to each customer's point of connection to the distribution system. AND: City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan Page No. 6 -5 Table 6 -1, continued: (b) At each high- service or booster pumping station that is constructed or altered under a construction permit for which the Department receives a complete application on or afterAugust 28, 2003, and that is connected to a community water system (CWS) serving, or designed to serve, 350 or more persons or 950 or more service connections, the supplier of water shall provide an installed or uninstalled standby pump of sufficient capacity to replace the largest pump. However, for C WSs that have multiple interconnected pumping stations subject to this requirement, the supplier of water may provide one uninstalled standby pump for each size of high- service or booster pump installed in the water system instead of providing a standby pump on site at each high - service or booster pumping station, and for water systems that have only one pumping station subject to this requirement and that are designed to serve 10, 000 or fewer persons, as many as three water systems located in the same county, or within 50 miles of one another, may enter into a mutual aid agreement to share one appropriately sized, uninstalled standby pump instead of providing a standby pump on site at each water system's high- service or booster pumping station. Standby Power • Sufficient capacity to deliver at least ADD during a power outage (FAC Chapter 62 -555). Distribution System Pressures must be at least 20 psi under PHD and MDD plus fire flow conditions at all points within the distribution system (FAC Chapter 62 -555). Velocities: The maximum velocity in pipes 12 inches and smaller should not exceed 5.0 feet per second (fps) and velocities in pipes larger than 12 inches should not exceed 6.0 fps (suggested criteria to limit excessive pressure drops and the potential for high transient pressures). Notes: 1. The Great Lakes Upper Mississippi River Board of State Public Health and Environmental Managers publication entitled "Recommended Standards for Water Works, 1992 Edition" is commonly known as 10 State Standards The requirements of this document are incorporated in FAG Chapter 62 -555 by reference. 2. The document titled "Water Treatment Plant Design, 3d Edition, 1997 ", which is published by the American Society of Civil Engineers, is incorporated under FAG Chapter 62 -555 by reference. City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan Page No. 6 -6 6.4 Distribution System 6.4.1 Distribution System Model Hydraulic models are used as tools in planning water systems. The hydraulic models serve the following primary functions in the planning process: ® Assignment of water demands to existing or proposed water distribution systems. Hydraulic calculations to determine pressures based on specified demands. • Sum the demands in a service area to determine the required water plant capacities and high service pumping requirements. • Analyze alternative future configurations or interconnections to improve the distribution system. No new modeling of the distribution system was performed for this study, see discussion in Chapter 4. 6.4.3 Hydrant Spacing City of Winter Springs Land Development Code requires a fire hydrant spacing no greaterthan 750 feet in single - family residential subdivisions and no greater than 350 feet in commercial /industrial areas. Fire hydrants shall be connected to mains not less than eight (8) inches in diameter. Fire hydrant spacing should be coordinated with the Fire Department to ensure adequate spacing and to verify locations are not blocked by major roads, railroads, or other obstructions from the intended area of coverage. 6.4.4 Line Size and Materials The minimum size water main should be eight -inch. This is the minimum size that can be used for connection of afire hydrant. Pipeline diameters smaller than eight -inch do not provide adequate fire flow capabilities. 6.4.5 Flow Rates and Pressures FDEP requires distribution facilities be designed to provide maximum hourly system demand without either the development of a distribution pressure lower than 20 PSI or other health hazards. Based on the recommendations of the International Fire Service Training Association, discussion with City of Winter Springs staff and our recent experience in the analysis and design of municipal City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan Page No. 6 -7 water systems, the following design criteria is used in evaluating Water Distribution Systems: A. The system should be capable of delivering fire flow plus maximum day demand with a minimum residual pressure of 20 PSI. B. The system should be capable of delivering the peak hourly flow (without fire demand) with a minimum residual pressure of 20 psi. C. Maximum velocity thru any pipe should be 8 fps. The previous WaterCAD analysis did not reveal any deficiencies in the Winter Springs distribution system. City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan Page No. 7 -1 CHAPTER 7 EVALUATION OF WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS 7.1 Water Supply and Treatment 7.1.1 General In this chapter, we evaluate various alternatives to ensure adequate system capabilities through the twenty -three year planning period. The evaluation is based on serving the existing and proposed service area. Expansion capabilities are limited at each water plant facility due to the proximity of residential /commercial areas. At WTP 2 there is space for a new ground storage tank and limited treatment and high service pump changes. However, no new wells could be added on the site. New wells must be place off -site if required. At WTP 3, there is very limited spaced for limited treatment changes and the high service pumps could be modified only by the change out of existing pumps. It would be advisable to investigate the purchase of adjacent properties for future expansion /treatment modifications that may be created by new regulations on water quality. WTP 1 has area for expansion, but is surrounded by major electrical power line easements. WTP 1 is currently under expansion for water quality improvements. No land is available for purchase beyond the existing site. All future work will have to be contained within the existing property boundaries. 7.1.2 Wells As discussed in Section 6.3, "Design Criteria ", total usable well field capacity should equal the maximum day flow in a 24 -hour period. The maximum day demand projected for the year 2040 is 7.56 MGD or 5,250 gpm for the service area. As shown on Table 4 -4, "Existing Water Plant Design Capacities ", the total available well capacity is 16.0 MGD or 11,100 gpm. With the largest well in the system out of service, which would be the 2400 gpm well at WTP 3, the well capacity is 12.5 MGD or 8,700 gpm. The well capacity available exceeds the projected 2040 maximum day demand for both criteria. A summary of the existing and projected well capacities is shown below. City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan Page No. 7 -2 (1) Column 1 is ali wells in service and corresponds to Condition 1 of Table 6 -1. Condition 1 includes 1250 gpm for design and fire flow. Column 2 is the capacity with the largest well out of service and Corresponds to Condition 2 of Table 6 -1. We recommend the following for wells: 1. No capital improvements are required to meet future needs. 2. Identify and purchase backup sites for existing wells. 7.1.3 Aerators The aerator capacities are shown on Table 4 -4, "Existing Water Plant Design Capacities ", for each water plant. The total aerator capacity is 14,900 gpm. Based on a maximum daily flow of 5250 gpm for the year 2040, the aerator capacity exceeds requirements. The aerator capacity is not equally distributed to each water plant, as shown below: City of Winter Springs —Water Supply Plan Page No. 7 -3 The existing aerator(s) at each plant exceeds the existing well capacity. Future treatment requirements may eliminate the need and/or use of the cascade aerators. We recommend the following for aerators: 1. No capital improvements are required to meet future needs. 7.1.4 Storage Treatment Capacity Table 7 -3, "System Projected Treatment Storage Requirements" summarizes the projected Treatment Storage. The total projected treatment storage for the system is approximately 1.89 MG (not including any contingent amount of storage) and 2.17 MG with a 15% storage contingency for the year 2040. Available storage is 2.5 MG. All three of the water treatment plants have more well capacity than the available treatment storage capacity. All plants are interconnected by the distribution system. Therefore, they do not work independently, but in harmony. The storage does not have to be distributed to each WTP by actual flow from each WTP in order for the system to work properly and /or meet the criteria. SYSTEM PROJECTED TABLE 7 -3 TREATMENT STORAGE REQUIREMENTS 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 Population : • • : • : • : • : • Average Daily .. Plow (MGD) Max. Day • (MGD) Equalization :. : • L Storage Contingency + i Storage (15 %) Total Storage Required Storage Provided We recommend the following for storage: 1. No capital improvements are required to meet future needs. City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan Page No. 7-4 7.1.5 High Service Pumping The peak flow demand (peak hourly) established in Section 5.0 and as shown on Table 5 -5, "Summary Projected Water Demands" is 7,920 gpm and the maximum day plus fire is 11,160 gpm for the year 2040. The Total Peak Flow Capacity of the system as shown on Table 4 -4, "Existing Water Plant Design Capacities" is 16,450 gpm and 12,950 with the largest pump out of service. 2025 7,500 16,450 2030 7,625 16,450 2035 7,750 16,450 2040 7,920 16,450 *Existing capacity 12,950 with largest pump in the system out of service (WTP1 — 3500 gpm) We recommend the following for high service: 1. No capital improvements are required to meet future needs. Renewal and replacement of existing pumps will be required and minor improvements can be made to increase capacity, if required and/or desired. 7.1.6 Auxiliary Power No improvements to auxiliary power are required over the life of the plan. The existing facilities meet the criteria required by FDEP of providing facilities (pumps and controls) that meet the average daily flow. The reliability of the LP engine direct drive and the portable generator connection at WTP 2 are not as good as a stand -by generator system. When electricity fails due to a major storm, the need for portable generators is greatly increased in the rest of the operating system and one may not be available for the well pump. In addition, a stand -by generator would be equipped with automatic switchover, which allows uninterrupted service to the customer and no intervention by an operator. City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan Page No. 7 -5 We recommend the following for auxiliary power: 1. Installation of a stand -by generator between 2030 and 2035 at WTP 2. 7.1.7 Fire Hydrant Additions No fire hydrant additions have been identified. No fire hydrant deficiencies have been identified. We recommend the following for fire hydrant additions: 1. No capital improvements are required to meet future needs. 7.1.8 Disinfection All plants have been converted to disinfection by sodium hypochlorite (liquid bleach). We recommend the following for disinfection: 1. No capital improvements are required to meet future needs. 7.2 Water Quality Treatment Improvements The City should remain up to date on alternative treatment methodologies available for meeting future regulatory criteria and limits that we anticipate will be enforced. The primary issues that may dictate the additional treatment process considerations are: • Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) • Sulfur Turbidity (a result of H2S levels) • Disinfection By- products (DBP's), including TTHM's and HAA's (at WTP 2 and WTP 3; WTP 1 improvements are under construction) • Disinfection — Four Log considerations • Corrosivity • Taste and Odors (also associated with H2S). Various water treatment processes exist that will produce a superior water quality and meet both the State and Federal water quality criteria, as well as the water quality goal established by the City. City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan APPFMX l.;,1(/ Lake Jesup Augmentation — CUP #105763 St. River s nil �. Water Management District Kirby B. Green III. Exacuttva Director • David W. Fisk Assistant "cxacu6ve Director 4049 Reid Street • P.O. Box 1429 a Paiatka.. FL 321781 429 • (3136) 3294500 On the Internet at wwwsirwmd.com. January 25, 2010 City of Winter Springs C/O Kipton Lockcuff 1126 E State Road 434 Winter Springs, FL 32708 SUBJECT: Consumptive Use Permit plumber 8238 City of Winter Springs Dear Sir /Madam. Enclosed is your permit as authorized by the Executive Director of St. Johns River Water Management District on January 25, 2010. Please be advised that the period of time within which a third party may request an administrative hearing on this permit may not have expired by the date of issuance. A potential petitioner has twenty -six (26) days from the date on which the actual notice is deposited in the mail, or twenty -one (21) days from publication of this notice when actual notice is not provided, within which to file a petition for an administrative hearing pursuant to Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statutes. Receipt of such a petition by the District may result in this permit becoming null and void. Permit issuance does not relieve you from the responsibility of obtaining permits from any federal, state and/or local agencies asserting concurrent jurisdiction over this work. The enclosed permit is a legal document and should be kept with your other important records. Please read the permit and conditions carefully since the referenced conditions may require submittal of additional information. All information submitted as compliance with permit conditions must be submitted to the nearest District Service Center and should include the above referenced permit number. Sincerely, Robert Presley, Director Division of Regulatory Information Management Enclosures: Permit, Conditions for Issuance, Compliance Forms, Map, Well Tags cc; District Permit File Agent: City of Winter Springs C/O Kipton Lockcuff 1126 E State Road 434 Winter Springs, FL 32708 GOVERNING BOARD Susan N Hughes, a .uamm W. Leonard WOOd, VICE CHAPMAN Mersey'Herky' Huilman, sECRETARY Hans G. Tanzler III, TREASURER PONTE VEDRA FERNANDINA BEACH ENTERPRISE JKKEONVIL LE Ra.rglas C. eaumique Michael Ertel Maryam H. Ghyahi Rictlard G. Hamann Arlen N. Jumper VERO BEACH OVIEDO aflMOND BEACH GNNE5VILEE FORT McCov PERMIT NO. 8233 PROJECT NAME: City of Winter Springs A PERMIT ,AUTHORIZING: DATE ISSUED: January 25, 2010 The District authorizes, as limited by the attached permit conditions, 4.70 million gallons per day (mgd)(annual average) of groundwater for household, urban landscape, commerciallindustrial, water Utility, and unaccounted-for types of use and 1.35 mgd (annual average) of surface water/reclaimed water for urban landscape irrigation to serve a projected population of 39,097 in 2013 and 4.14 mgd (annual average) of groundwater for household, urban landscape, commerciallindustrial, water utility, and unaccounted -for types of use and 2.73 mgd (annual average) of surface waterlreclaimed water for urban landscape irrigation to serve a projected population of 44,982 in 2029. LOCATION: Site: WTP 1 Seminole County Site: WTP 2 Seminole County Site: WTP 3 Seminole County Sections: 38 Townships: 20 South Ranges: 30 East 37 21 South 30 East 9 21 South 31 East ISSUED TO: City of Winter Springs 1128 E State Road 434 Winter Springs, FL 32708 Permittee agrees to hold and save the St. ,Johns River Water Management District and its successors harmless from any and all damages, claims, or liabilities, which may arise from permit issuance. Said application, including all maps and specifications attached thereto, is by reference made a part hereof. This permit does not convey to permittee any property rights nor any rights or privileges other than those specified herein, nor relieve the permittee from complying with any law, regulation or requirement affecting the rights of other bodies or agencies. All structures and works installed by permittee hereunder shall remain the property of the permittee. This permit may be revolted, modified or transferred at any time pursuant to the appropriate provisions of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes and 40C-1, Florida Administrative Code. PERMIT IS CONDITIONED UPON: See conditions on attached "Exhibit A ", dated January 25, 2090 AUTHORIZED BY: St. Johns River Water Management. District Department of Resource Management By; By: Harold A. WiTln III Kirby een, III Direc Executive Director "EXHIBIT A° CONDITIONS FOR ISSUANCE OF PERMIT NUMBER 8238 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS DATED JANUARY 25, 2010 1. District authorized staff, upon proper identification, will have permission to enter, inspect, and observe permitted and related facilities in order to determine compliance with the approved plans, specifications, and conditions of this permit. 2. Nothing in this permit should be construed to limit the authority of the St. Johns River Water Management District to declare a water shortage and issue orders pursuant to Section 373.175, Florida Statutes, or to formulate a plan for implementation during periods of water shortage, pursuant to Section 373.246, Florida Statutes. In the event a water shortage is declared by the District Governing Board, the permittee must adhere to the water shortage restrictions as specified by the District, even though the specified water shortage restrictions may be inconsistent with the terms and conditions of this permit. 3. Prior to the construction, modification, or abandonment of a well, the permittee must obtain a Water Well Construction Permit from the St. Johns River Water Management District, or the appropriate local government pursuant to Chapter 40C -3, Florida Administrative Code. Construction, modification, or abandonment of a well will require modification of the consumptive use permit when such construction, modification, or abandonment is other than that specified and described on the consumptive use permit application form. 4. Leaking or inoperative well casings, valves, or controls must be repaired or replaced as required to eliminate the leak or make the system fully operational, 5. The permittee's consumptive use shall not adversely impact wetlands, lakes, and spring flows or contribute to a violation of minimum flows and levels adopted in Chapter 40C -8, F.A.C., except as authorized by a SJRWMD- approved minimum flow or level (MFL) recovery strategy. If unanticipated significant adverse impacts occur, the SJRWMD shall revoke the permit in whole or in part to curtail or abate the adverse impacts, unless the impacts are mitigated by the permittee pursuant to a District- approved plan. G. Off- site land uses existing at-the time of permit application may not be significantly adversely impacted as a result of the consumptive use. If unanticipated significant adverse impacts occur, the District shall revoke the permit in whole or in part to curtail or abate the adverse impacts, unless the impacts can be mitigated by the permittee. 7. The District must be notified, in writing, within 30 days of any sale, conveyance, or other transfer of a well or facility from which the permitted consumptive use is made or with in 30 days of any transfer of ownership or control of the real property at which the permitted consumptive use is located. All transfers of ownership or transfers of permits are subject to the provisions of section 40C- 1.612. 8. A District issued identification tag shall be prominently displayed at each withdrawal site by permanently affixing such tag to the pump, headgate, valve, or other withdrawal facility as provided by Section 40C- 2.401, Florida Administrative Code. Permittee shall notify the District in the event that a replacement tag is needed. 9. The permittee's use of water as authorized by this permit shall not cause an interference with an existing legal use of water as defined in District rules. If interference occurs, the District may revoke the permit in whole or in part to abate the adverse impact unless otherwise mitigated by the permittee. In those cases where other permit holders are identified by the District as also contributing to the interference, the permittee may choose to mitigate in a cooperative effort with these other permittees. The permittee shall submit a mitigation plan to the District, and obtain District approval, prior to implementing any mitigation. 10. If, in any year, the actual volume of water withdrawn by the permittee equals 95 percent or more of the amount of water allocated for use by this permit, then the permittee shall submit a report to the District that explains why the withdrawal of water by the permittee equals 95 percent or more of the amount allocated for in this permit. The report shall evaluate the effect of the following on the volume of water withdrawn by the permittee: A) Climatic shortfalls (drought); B) Greater than anticipated growth in the permittee's service area; C) Inefficient usage within the service area D) Other factors that account for the withdrawal volume equaling 95 percent or more of the allocation. The report must include a breakdown of the population currently being served by the permittee, an updated projection of anticipated population that will be served for the following year, an evaluation as to whether the permittee anticipates whether it will be able to meet the water needs of the revised projected population without violating the allocations set forth in this permit, and a corrective action plan setting actions that the permittee intends to take if the evaluation indicates that allocations will be exceeded during the following year. The report must be submitted to the District by February 28 1h of the year following the year during which the permittee experienced withdrawals of water that equals 95 percent or more of the amount of water allocated for use by this permit. 11. If the permittee does not serve a new projected demand located within the service area upon which the annual allocation was calculated, the annual allocation will be subject to modification by the District. 12, All submittals made to demonstrate compliance with this permit must include the CUP number 8238 plainly labeled. 13. This permit shall expire January 12, 2030. 14. The permittee must monitor all water from each production well using a totalizing flowrneter. These meters must maintain 95% accuracy, be verifiable and be installed according to the manufacturers specifications. 15. Total withdrawal from each well, as listed on the application, must be recorded continuously, totaled monthly, and reported to the District at least every six months using District Form No. EN -50. The reporting dates each year after that date will be as follows: Reporting Period Report Due Date January - June July 31 July - December January 31 16. The Permittee must maintain all meters. In case of failure or breakdown of any meter, the District must be notified in writing within 5 days of its discovery. A defective meter must be repaired or replaced within 30 days of its discovery. 17. The permittee must have all flow meters checked for accuracy at least once every 3 years within 30 days of the anniversary date of permit issuance, and recalibrated if the difference between the actual flow and the meter reading is greater than 5 %. District Form No. EN -51 must be submitted to the District within 10 days of the inspection /calibration. 18. The maximum annual groundwater withdrawals from wells 1 -East (GRS ID 15327), 2- East (GRS ID 15328), 3 -East (GRS ID 15329), 4 -East (GRS ID 15330), 3 -West (GRS ID 15324),6-West (GRS ID 15326), 4 -West (GRS ID 15323) and 5 -West (GRS ID 15325) for household, urban landscape irrigation, commerciaMndustria1, unaccounted for, and water utility types must not exceed: 1,613.30 million gallons (4.42 mgd average) in 2009 1,649.80 million gallons (4.52 mgd average) in 2010 1,689.95 million gallons (4.63 mgd average) in 2011 1,693.60 million gallons (4.64 mgd average) in 2012 1,715.50 million gallons (4.70 mgd average) in 2013 1,671.70 million gallons (4.58 mgd average) in 2014 1,664,40 million gallons (4.56 mgd average) in 2015 1,657.10 million gallons (4.54 mgd average) in 2016 1,627.90 million gallons (4.46 mgd average) in 2017 1,595.05 million gallons (4.37 mgd average) in 2018 1,562.20 million gallons (4.28 mgd average) in 2019 1,518.40 million gallons (4.16 mgd average) in 2020 1,514.75 million gallons (4.15 mgd average) in 2021 1,514.75 million gallons (4.15 mgd average) in 2022 1,511.10 million gallons (4.14 mgd average) in 2023 through 2029. However, for each wellfield, the maximum annual groundwater withdrawal must not exceed: WTP -1 1,514.75 million gallons (3.41mgd average) in 2009 through 2029. WTP -2 1,514.75 million gallons (0.822 mgd average) in 2009 through 2029. WTP -3 1,514.75 million gallons (1.64 mgd average) in 2009 through 2029. 19. The maximum annual quantities of reclaimed /surface water for landscape irrigation type use in the City's service area from the East Reclaimed Water System (GRS 404624) and West Reclaimed Water System (GRS 404625) connection points must not exceed: 445.30 million gallons (1.22 mgd average) in 2009 438.00 million gallons (1.20 mgd average) in 2010 441.65 million gallons (1.21 mgd average) in 2011 474.50 million gallons (1.30 mgd average) in 2012 492.75 million gallons (1.35 mgd average) in 2013 554.80 million gallons (1.52 mgd average) in 2014 562.10 million gallons (1.54 mgd average) in 2015 605.90 million gallons (1.66 mgd average) in 2016 657.00 million gallons (1.80 mgd average) in 2017 704.45 million gallons (1.93 mgd average) in 2018 762.85 million gallons (2.09 mgd average) in 2019 813.95 million gallons (2.23 mgd average) in 2020 839.50 million gallons (2.30 mgd average) in 2021 876.00 million gallons (2.40 mgd average) in 2022 901.55 million gallons (2.47 mgd average) in 2023 908.85 million gallons (2.49 mgd average) in 2014 919.80 million gallons (2.52 mgd average) in 2015 941.70 million gallons (2.58 mgd average) in 2016 956.30 million gallons (2.62 mgd average) in 2027 981.85 million gallons (2.69 mgd averaged in 2028 996.45 million gallons (2.73 mgd average) in 2029. The permittee may provide additional quantities of reclaimed /surface water for use in the City's service area, provided such additional quantities are as necessary for economic and efficient utilization. 20. The permittee must implement the Water Conservation Plan submitted to the District on May 21, 2007, and in accordance with the schedules contained therein. The permittee must maintain a log of those activities completed as part of the plan. A report detailing the progress of the plan implementation must be submitted annually to the District on or before January 31 st of the following year. 21. The lowest quality water source, such as reclaimed water or surface /storm water, must be used as irrigation water when deemed feasible pursuant to District rules and applicable state law. 22. All landscape irrigation by the permittee shall be in conformity with the requirements set forth in subsection 40C- 2.042(2),-F.A.C. 23. Within one year of permit issuance, the permittee shall adopt a city -wide landscape irrigation ordinance that fully implements the landscape irrigation provisions in District Rule 40C- 2.042(2), Florida Administrative Code, and that also restricts the use of reclaimed water by the City's reclaimed water customers to no more than two days per week. The ordinance must include adequate enforcement mechanisms and it may not regulate in any other manner the consumptive use of water. 24. The permittee must conduct detailed water audits for calendar years 2012, 2015, 2018, 2021, 2024, and 2027 and submit each audit to the District by February 15th of the following year. All water uses given in the audit must be for the previous calendar year and documentation must be provided on how the amounts were metered or determined. If the water audit shows that, the system losses and unaccounted -for water utility uses exceed 10 %, leak detection and repair program must be implemented. 25. Monitoring wells MW -L1 (GRS ID No. 242390), MW -L2 (GRS ID No. 242391) and MW- V1 (GRS ID No. 242392) must be installed within one year of permit issuance, in accordance with all specifications as described in the Floridan Aquifer Groundwater Water Quality Monitoring Plan, Modified January 24, 2008, and submitted to the District on March 4, 2008, 26. Within 90 days of the District's notifying the permittee that changes in ground water geochemistry in any of the permitted wells may be trending towards a chloride concentration or geochemicai type of ground water significantly different from background levels and indicating potential saline water intrusion, the permittee must submit to the District for approval a plan to avoid or abate potential impacts. The plan must include a schedule for implementing avoidance or other measures, which may include modification of the well construction, well rehabilitation, reduction in well or well field withdrawal rates, or other measures identified by the permittee to avoid or abate the potential impacts. The permittee must implement the District- approved plan pursuant to the schedule set forth in the plan. 27. If unanticipated significant saline water intrusion occurs in any of the permitted wells as a result of the withdrawals authorized by this permit, the District shall revoke the permit in whole or in part to curtail or abate the adverse impacts unless the impacts are abated by the permittee pursuant to the plan approved by the District under Condition 25. 28. The permittee must have groundwater levels in monitoring wells MW -L1 (GRS ID No. 242390), MW -1-2 (GRS ID No. 242391) and MW -V1 (GRS iD No. 242392) measured for the duration of the permit according to the schedule provided for water quality monitoring in the plan identified in Condition 24 above. Groundwater levels must be measured to an accuracy of 0.01 foot prior to purging each monitoring well in preparation for groundwater quality sampling. Groundwater levels must be converted to elevations relative to the North American Vertical Datum (NAVD) of 1988, and submitted in a digital format readable by the District's computerized database. 29. Water level monitoring must be initiated by July 12, 2010. The permittee must conduct hydrologic and photo monitoring at each of the three (3) wetland areas listed below: a) #60, Unidentified Mixed Hardwood Swamp, located west of Baywood Ave. (Sec. 29 & 30, T. 20 S., R. 30 E.); b) #84, Unnamed swamp in Sunshine Park, (Sec. 34, T. 20 S., R. 313 E.); c) #138, Unnamed swamp located west of Sybilwood Cir, (Sec. 12, T. 21 S., R. 30 E.). The permittee must install shallow monitoring wells at each of the wetland sites listed above. The wells must be located near the upland /wetland interface. The monitoring well design and specific locations must be approved in writing by the District staff before the wells are installed. The monitoring wells must be installed by a licensed water well contractor (as required in 373.336 (1)(b), F.S.), and all monitoring devices Shall be surveyed to NAVD (1988) to an accuracy of +/- 0,01 foot. If another agency or utility is monitoring the same water body, then the same monitoring equipment or data can, upon written approval by SJRWMD, be used with the owner's consent. A staff gauge may substitute for a shallow monitoring well if District staff determines that the substitution would be capable of capturing a complete range of water fluctuation. 30. Transect locations where vegetation and soils are to be sampled must be approved by the District for each wetland- monitoring site by July 12, 2010. Each transact shall be 150 feet in length, located so as to include 50 feet of the adjacent upland, and oriented towards the wetland center and perpendicular to the wetland edge. The monitoring well should be located on the transact (if possible). If the adjacent upland consists of placed fill, then the transact may be limited to 120 feet in length, including 20 feet of the adjacent upland. The following information must be recorded for each transact: a) A permanent photo station must be monumented on the transact near the monitoring well for annual photographs, b) Soil surface elevations must be recorded to an accuracy of +/- 0.1 foot at 5- foot intervals and wherever there is a change in plant community. c) Other environmental features such as the upland /wetland interface, current water level, cypress buttress inflection points (up to 3 individuals), lower extent of lichen lines or upper extent of moss collars, watermarks, and the lower edge of the saw palmetto (Serenoa repens) fringe must be surveyed, if present. d) Plant communities must be described, including a listing of all vascular plant species, by plant community, present within 10 feet of one side of the transact line, their relative abundance, and the diameter at breast height (d.b.h.) of any woody plants greater than 1" d.b.h. e) A description of soil color, texture, and hydric soil indicators must be made in the top 24 inches of soil at 25 -foot intervals along the transect described above for 7 stations. If the soil survey depicts the soils as open water, then the soil description wilt occur out to a water depth of 3 feet, and depth to sediment surface and depth of organic substrate will be recorded for the remaining intervals. 31. A Baseline Monitoring Site Report must be submitted to the District on or before January 12, 2011. The report must include the following information for each monitoring site (as applicable): a) a diagram of the elevations, plant communities, and hydric soils located along the transect, b) a summary of the soils data collected, c) a summary of the vegetation data collected, and d) information regarding the installation of the monitoring wells, including a well completion report, latitudellongitude coordinates of the well, well location on a map, and a brief site description. 32. Monitoring data must be submitted electronically as spreadsheets on or before January 31" and July 31st, in a District - approved computer - accessible format. Data submittal will start on January 31, 2010. The following information must be recorded by the permittee for each wetland monitoring site: water level (weekly without data loggers or daily with data loggers) and pumping volume (weekly by well). Water level data must be reported as elevation above sea level (NAVD 1983). The Permittee must contact the District for specific details on how to submit the computer - accessible information. These data must also be submitted as a legible paper copy (two copies). 33. On or before March 31', starting in 2011, the permittee must submit an annual report summarizing the monitoring efforts and comparing all of the wetland monitoring data recorded for the last calendar year and previous years. The report must include panoramic photographs taken in September at the established photo stations, and graphs summarizing the pumping volume and monitoring data. The elevation of the upland/wetland interface must be indicated on the graphs. In addition, the report will include a brief analysis of any data trends. 34. If the permittee is unable to obtain or maintain legal access to any of the monitoring sites referenced above, the permittee must notify SJRWMD in writing within 15 days of concluding that access to any specific site is not possible. Within 45 days of this notification, the permittee must submit an alternative site to modify the monitoring network. Within six months of SJRWMD approval of the monitoring network modification, the permittee must implement the approved change(s). 35. In May of each year for the duration of this permit, the permittee must collect and have analyzed a water quality sample from each of the following wells: Well 3 -EAST (GRS ID No. 15329), Well 5 -WEST (GRS ID No. 15325), Well 6 -WEST (GRS ID No. 15326), MW -L1 (GRS ID No. 242390), MW -1-2 (GRS ID No. 242391) and MW -V1 (GRS ID No. 242392). Each sample must be analyzed for the following: Feld Temperature ( °C) pH (Units) Dissolved Oxygen (MG /1) Laboratory Total alkalinity (as mg /L CaCO3) Carbonate alkalinity (as mg /L CaCO3) Lab pH (Units) Specific conductance (umhos /cm) Turbidity (NTU) Potassium (mg /L) Sodium (mg /L) Sulfate (mg /L) Calcium (mg /L) Specific Conductance (umhos /cm) Chloride (mg /L) Total Iron (mg /L) Magnesium (mg /L) Total Dissolved Solids (mg /L) Sample Collection Samples must be collected in accordance with all applicable provisions of the standard operating procedures (SOP) of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) in DEP -SOP- 001/01, under the DEP Quality Assurance Rule, 62 -160, F.A.G. The wells must be purged in accordance with DEP - SOP - 001/01, and well purging must be documented using the Groundwater Sampling Log form found in the referenced DEP SOP. Samples must be stored on ice immediately after collection, and remain on ice until received by the laboratory. It is recommended that sample duplicates be taken to allow for laboratory errors or data loss and that these samples be stored by the laboratory for a minimum of 60 days to ensure backup sample availability should re- analysis be required. Quality Assurance The permittee must provide documentation using forms specified in DEP -SOP- 001101 that field instruments were properly calibrated prior to obtaining field measurements. All water quality analysis must be performed by a laboratory certified by the Florida Department of Health (FDOH) and the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference (NELAC). All laboratory analysis must be done by methods for which the laboratory has FDOH certification. All laboratory analysis must be completed within EPA holding times. If the data is lost or a laboratory error occurs and the EPA holding time for the analysis has expired, the permittee must resample the well within 15 days of notification from the laboratory that a loss or laboratory error has occurred. With the exception of pH, laboratory analysis using selective ion electrodes is not acceptable because of the inadequate sensitivity of these methods. Analysis using test kits typically used for field screening (e.g., Hach and LaMotte) is also not acceptable for the same reason. All major ion analysis must be checked for anion- cation balance and must balance (equivalent concentrations as meq /L) within 5 %. If the anion - cation balance does not balance within 5 %, the permittee must review the data and include in the report submitted to the District a discussion of the cause or explanation of the imbalance. If the anion - cation balance does not balance within 5 %, the permittee may be required to re- analyze the sample if it is within acceptable holding times, or to resample the well and reanalyze the sample. Reports A "Water Quality Monitoring Report" of the results from each of the sampling events must be submitted to the District no later than June 30 of the year in which samples were collected. The reports of results shall include the following: (a) Well sampling log; (b) Field instrumentation calibration verification; (c) Chain of custody forms; and (d) Laboratory analytical report in approved format. All data must be submitted to the District in a District - approved electronic format consistent with FDO H and NELAC laboratory reporting requirements. 36. The permittee must collect and have analyzed a water quality sample quarterly in February, May, August and November for 3 years from the date of installation from each of the following wells: MW -L1 (GRS ID No. 242390), MW -1-2 (GRS ID No. 242391) and MW -V1 (GRS ID No, 242392). The water quality sample must conform to the water quality sampling criteria in the "Annual Water Quality Monitoring Report." A "Quarterly Water Quality Monitoring Report" of the results of the February, May, August and November. sampling events must be submitted to the District no later than March 30 for the February event, June 30 for the May event, September 30 for the August event and December 30 for the November event of the year in which samples were collected. 37. The applicant must submit to the District the DEP Annual Reuse Report, DEP Form 62- 610.300(4)(a)2 (Parts I -XI) by January 1 after the completion of each fiscal year (October 1 through September 30), for the duration of the permit. 38. The permittee must submit to the District a compliance report every five years under subsection 373.236(4), Florida Statutes. The Permittee must submit the report by December 31 st of 2015, 2020 and 2025. The report must contain sufficient information to demonstrate that the permittee's use of water continues, for the remaining duration of the permit, to meet the conditions for permit issuance set forth in the District rules that existed at the time the permit was issued for 20 years by the District. In providing such assurance, the compliance report must, at a minimum: a) Meet the submittal requirements of section 4.2 of the Applicant's Handbook: Consumptive Uses of Water, March 9, 2009; b) Evaluate whether the permittee is implementing all available water conservation measures, programs and technologies and evaluating any new programs or technologies and the potential savings of these measures; c) Report on progress in developing supplemental water supply projects; d) Evaluate whether residential per capita water use remains within acceptable ranges; e) Demonstrate all available effluent is being reused; f) Evaluate summary statistics and time series trend analysis for each production and monitoring well for water quality data generated under the requirements of this permit to ensure that significant adverse water quality changes do not occur. g) Verify that the groundwater withdrawal amounts authorized herein can continue to be made without inducing significant saline water intrusion, causing the water table level or aquifer potentiometric surface level to be lowered so that stages or vegetation will be adversely and significantly affected or causing the level of a water table aquifer, the potentlometric surface level of a aquifer, or the water level of a surface water to be lowered below a minimum level which has been established under subsection 373.042, F.S., in section 40C- 8.031, F.A.C.; h) Verify that the use of the surface water is not interfering with existing legal users; i) Provide a description of the current reclaimed water supply and delivery system and annual flow amount for the previous 5 years; j) Provide a summary of the utility's efforts in creating partnerships with other utilities to develop and use alternative water sources, including reclaimed water, surface water and stormwater. FLOW METER WATER CALIBRATION RECORD - EN51 ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Post Office Box 1429 Palatka, Florida 32178.1429 Consumptive Use Permit Number: 8238 Permittee Name: City of Winter Springs Date of Permit Issuance: January 25, 2010 Station Name: 1 EAST Pump Capacity: 1200 GPM Serial Number on Meter: Meter Model: Discharge Pipe Diameter: Date of Last Meter Calibration: Date of This Calibration: 1 / Name of Person Performing Calibration: Method or Equipment Used for Calibration: Initial Meter Reading at Start of Calibration: Final Meter Reading at End of Calibration: Readings on Equipment Used for Calibration: Start: End: (Attach Formulas Used to Make Calculations) Percent of Error Between Meter Reading and Calibration Equipment: Name of Person Completing Form (Please Print): Company Name: Address: City/State/Zip: Daytime Telephone: ( ) - Please Retain a Copy for Your Records FLOW METER WATER CALIBRATION RECORD - EN51 ST JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Post Office Box 1429 Palatka, Florida 32178 -1429 Consumptive Use Permit Number: 8238 Permittee Name: City of Winter Springs Date of Permit Issuance: January 25, 2010 Station Name: 2EAST Pump Capacity: 2000 GPM Serial Number on Meter: Meter Model: Discharge Pipe Diameter: Date of Last Meter Calibration: / 1 Date of This Calibration: / 1 Name of Person Performing Calibration: Method or Equipment Used for Calibration: Initial Meter Reading at Start of Calibration: Final Meter Reading at End of Calibration: Readings on Equipment Used for Calibration: Start: End: (Attach Formulas Used to Make Calculations) Percent of Error Between Meter Reading and Calibration Equipment: Name of Person Completing Form (Please Print): Company Name: Address: City /State /Zip: Daytime Telephone: ( } Please Retain a Copy for Your Records FLOW METER WATER CALIBRATION RECORD - EN51 ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Post Office Box 1429 Palatka, Florida 32178 -1429 Consumptive Use Permit Number: 8235 Permittee Name: City of Winter Springs Date of Permit Issuance: January 253 2010 Station Name: 3EAST Pump Capacity: 2000 GPM Serial Number on Meter: Meter Model: Discharge Pipe Diameter: Date of Last Meter Calibration. / 1 Date of This Calibration: 1 1 Name of Person Performing Calibration; Method or Equipment Used for Calibration: Initial Meter Reading at Start of Calibration: Final Meter Reading at End of Calibration: Readings on Equipment Used for Calibration: Start: End: (Attach Formulas Used to Make Calculations) Percent of Error Between Meter Reading and Calibration Equipment: Name of Person Completing Form (Please Print): Company Name: Address: City /State /Zip: Daytime Telephone: ( ) - Please Retain a Copy for Your Records 0/p FLOW METER WATER CALIBRATION RECORD - ENS1 ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Post Office Box 1429 Palatka, Florida 32178 -1428 Consumptive Use Permit Number: 8238 Permittee Name: City of Winter Springs Date of Permit Issuance: January 25, 2010 Station Name: 3WEST Pump Capacity: 1100 GPM Serial Number on Meter: Meter Model: Discharge Pipe Diameter: Date of Last Meter Calibration: / 1 Date of This Calibration: 1 / Name of Person Performing Calibration: Method or Equipment Used for Calibration: Initial Meter Reading at Start of Calibration: Final Meter Reading at End of Calibration: Readings on Equipment Used for Calibration: Start: End: (Attach Formulas Used to Make Calculations) Percent of Error Between Meter Reading and Calibration Equipment: Name of Person Completing Form (Please Print): Company Name: Address: City /State /Zip: Daytime Telephone: (T) Please Retain a Copy for Your Records FLOW METER WATER CALIBRATION RECORD - EN51 ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Post Office Box 1429 Palatka, Florida 32178 ®1429 Consumptive Use Permit Number: 8238 Permittee Name: City of Winter Springs Date of Permit Issuance: January 25, 2010 Station Name: 4EAST Pump Capacity: 1200 GPM Serial Number on Meter: Meter Model: Discharge Pipe Diameter: Date of Last Meter Calibration: / 1 Date of This Calibration: / l Name of Person Performing Calibration: Method or Equipment Used for Calibration: Initial Meter Reading at Start of Calibration: Final Meter Reading at End of Calibration: Readings on Equipment Used for Calibration: Start: End: (Attach Formulas Used to Make Calculations) Percent of Error Between Meter Reading and Calibration Equipment: % Name of Person Completing Form (Please Print): Company Name: Address: City/State/Zip: Daytime Telephone: ( ) - Please Retain a Copy for Your Records FLOW METER WATER CALIBRATION RECORD - EN51 ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Post Office Box 1429 Palatka, Florida 32175 -1429 Consumptive Use Permit plumber: 3235 Permittee Name: City of Winter Springs Date of Permit Issuance: January 25, 2010 Pump Capacity: 1100 GPM Serial Number on Meter: Meter Model: Discharge Pipe Diameter: Station Name: 4WEST Date of Last Meter Calibration: / 1 Date of This Calibration: 1 1 Name of Person Performing Calibration: Method or Equipment Used for Calibration: Initial Meter Reading at Start of Calibration: Final Meter Reading at End of Calibration: Readings on Equipment Used for Calibration: Start: End: (attach Formulas Used to Make Calculations) Percent of Error Between Meter Reading and Calibration Equipment: '% Name of Person Completing Form (Please Print): Company Name: Address: City /State /Zip: Daytime Telephone: ( ) - Please Retain a Copy for Your Records FLOW METER WATER CALIBRATION RECORD - EN51 ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Post Office Box 1429 Palatka, Florida 32178 -1429 Consumptive Use Permit Number: 8238 Permittee Name: City of Winter Springs Date of Permit issuance: January 25, 2010 Station Name: 5WEST Pump Capacity: 1800 GPM Serial Number on Meter: Meter Model: Discharge Pipe Diameter: Date of Last Meter Calibration: Date of This Calibration: Name of Person Performing Calibration: Method or Equipment Used for Calibration: Initial Meter Reading at Start of Calibration: Final Meter Reading at End of Calibration: Readings on Equipment Used for Calibration: Start: End: (Attach Formulas Used to Make Calculations) Percent of Error Between Meter Reading and Calibration Equipment: Name of Person Completing Form (Please Print): Company Name: Address: City /State /Zip: Daytime Telephone: ( ) - Please Retain a Copy for Your Records FLOW METER WATER CALIBRATION RECORD - EN51 ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Post Office Box 1429 Palatka, Florida 32178 -1429 Consumptive Use Permit Number: 6236 Permittee Name: City of Winter Springs Date of Permit Issuance: January 25, 2010 Station Name: 6WEST Pump Capacity: 1500 GPM Serial Number on Meter: Meter Model: Discharge Pipe Diameter. Date of Last Meter Calibration: 1 1 Date of This Calibration: / Name of Person Performing Calibration: Method or Equipment Used for Calibration: Initial Meter Reading at Start of Calibration: Final Meter Reading at End of Calibration: Readings on Equipment Used for Calibration: Start: End: `Attach Formulas Used to Make Calculations) Percent of Error Between Meter Reading and Calibration Equipment: % Name of Person Completing Form (Please Print): Company Name: Address: City /State /Zip: Daytime Telephone: ( ) - Please Retain a Copy for Your Records FLOW METER WATER CALIBRATION RECORD - EN51 ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Post Office Box 1429 Palatka, Florida 32178 -1429 Consumptive Use Permit Number: 8238 Permittee Name: City of Winter Springs Date of Permit Issuance: January 25, 2010 Station Name: East Reclaimed Water Facility Pump Capacity: 5000 GPM Serial Number on Meter: Meter Model: Discharge Pipe Diameter: Date of Last Meter Calibration Date of This Calibration: Name of Person Performing Calibration: 1 ! / 1 Method or Equipment Used for Calibration: Initial Meter Reading at Start of Calibration: Final Meter Reading at End of Calibration: Readings on Equipment Used for Calibration: Start: End: JAttach Formulas Used to Make Calculations) Percent of Error Between Meter Reading and Calibration Equipment: Name of Person Completing Form (Please Print): Company Name: Address: City /State /Zip: Daytime Telephone: ( _-_) - Please Retain a Copy for Your Records FLOW METER WATER CALIBRATION RECORD - EN51 ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Post Office Box 1429 Palatka, Florida 32178 -1429 Consumptive Use Permit Number: 8238 Permittee Name: City of Winter Spriggs Date of Permit Issuance: January 25, 2010 Station Name: West Reclaimed Water Facility Pump Capacity: 5000 GPM Serial Number on Meter: Meter Model: Discharge Pipe Diameter: Date of Last Meter Calibration Date of This Calibration: Name of Person Performing Calibration: 1 f 1 1 Method or Equipment Used for Calibration: Initial Meter Reading at Start of Calibration: Final Meter Reading at End of Calibration: Readings on Equipment Used for Calibration: Start: End: (Attach Formulas Used to Make Calculations) Percent of Error Between Meter Reading and Calibration Equipment: Name of Person Completing Form (Please Print): Company Name: Address: City /State /Zip: Daytime Telephone: (�) - Please Retain a Copy for Your Records p�o no 0 7 Miles Cif y of Winter r� rags 7'38® ern ino� e COUnty l�T1Esi1l�C� i�HCilnher 12,20M, 2008 Digital Ort`ho Quadrangle "The S1. Jbhns Ricer Abur hUnapffwnt Distna prepares xw ures this: hfOMM10n W tr.,u+n purpom and thir ntoQ MIonmi%vnotb* seeable nr nmv purposes. Iles ntninown is provsded 2M rf Fullher dr aimenranan ofthxs dna can be obtained byoaaaad ing St bMs Ricer uttiter gement { "- ct. Geographlo hfornatimi '-%jaerm.Program Managem®m. P b .Bax 1420. 4040 Nid PAmrkt. F londra 32178-1410 'Pal M0323-417b, - ,y; .z I; '►. Al ;Ivf._ - I '"- Js- _ry _ _ �.- .. - , k tw::•:a;- ;rlr »7 a4t--° zzi 3, � -- 5_6! - "';,at: :a+k • 'i:•. ..,ia '-.,y:. $ -'_� - k • .'.ill e" -, Jlt u' 1.�i1. ::' v ry 15 7 :d : :. ]A •Y�t N° �JLI.::�' .:ti > aix yd,: ,.Ir A,.; °..: _:,+>v . '; � �fF��:-� ::i - +.I't`� -_ -�"� ✓.. _ P� .y'J,C fit .:. '�'• •.y,., ..... °�:_. -. �4 rl - _ '-,. »°aIF��t'��— ''� _tf `�6: .]'.- ! F:"�+• -._: R�yli{ ;.bi" ...1 ;V •f. :_rf1i51r7•y "i r :F.+. ._._ •�5 '_.`1e,�•� ... i. r w !W :sic Sr N. .4, i t,. - -. at.r •,YJ.i f ' •13 ... l 'I. '` -+tom_. ,a �• �s 41 43 r . �. ' LI � ICv. r �`5�1.r _ ,.yam ..f i:yi� r�!••..� •.,�v YNI ainng =: �i X17 r' = fit} -s_ u +: •'aw . .x }.�,�J7 5�"� �`'rir a�'� �d � °.xQ * rs>. �r,� � ,,� I:, �a i�;• • iY- ,.. ' � �_. r. ,fir' A. ��, �, r .. ��. - - 11a }.•- `r. '_af . All •'If'. `t IA _ I - -. 'ak;:• Ji i 4 -.I. �d�i� f!: W�..'.' - .J''� - .i A;(i,+ ,IP Fr au : t. Generallz*d lane! us*. 2004 NAAPC LA S5 �" II t7e Agriculture or e*adive " � I '.. All dBu Built -up area Law Sand or disturbed surface - c Jf . CI 4{ �•; , . `S`: + -.111. . - n 'drier '�''r - � VVetlenrl '�",.:t: v ::�,. �� - ''' -_ . ��•' '�4 —." 5,� � • .. - � .. 1 {� f The St. John$ Riper tlU, w I y hbnagemsnt oiAria prepares aw asesthit Morrmian W is awn purpons and rhGs e,9orrmlen Maynot be amble br other purposes. This brbmwlon is prauidetl,AS is. City of Winter Springs FinTherdecument3tion011his d=oanbe obtained bywr aapng: 0 1 3 8238-6 °,t. ct, 1 Wier U to hiA wnfiament �L [1�i�. Geagraphie hforsrot➢on Miles Stemramea P0 9ox 1429, 4040 likid Samin Seminole Count/ Pstatia, Florida 37179.1430 Created; neaember 12, 2008 set Qse)32a•417a, N A 1 Met; t; City of Winter Springs 8238-6 Seminole County Cipalf-& Decombet 12, 2QO8 2,008 Digital or'tho Quadrangle The St Alhns Rimer 1414 r ta'tina1lvm?nt OiAnci prepares ,mA u:u_ this hfonmian toa tx awn purpoc ®c and thii ntfrmmjnn may ncrt bo able tic u$tar G uFA S TI'ns nforr mion is pP6+�ded ti! +r Fumer documentation otWs mm can be obtained byooraacling: hhns Rimer %fter WnRgement -:.ut, Geographic htonrefion ems Yr,: qmm IMana!tQtnem, ki.Box 1429, 4049 Fard tamwt Pi191W Flonda 3217A, 1429 %f; t3 *) 32P.4174, b - '' St. Johns River In mix Wager M a�� .h, Kirby R. Gruen III, Execuli- Direclor - David W Fisk, Assistant Executive Direclor 4049 Reid Street , P.O. Box 1429 - Palatka, FL 32178 -1429 ® (386) 329 -4500 On the Internet at wwwsjrwmd.corn, April 10, 2007 City of Winter Springs 1126 E SR 434 Winter Springs, FL 32708 SUBJECT: Consumptive Use Permit Number 105763 City of Winter Springs Reclaimed Water Augmentation Dear Sir /Madam: Enclosed is your permit as authorized by the St. Johns River Water Management District on April 10, 2007. Please be advised that the period of time within which a third party may request an administrative hearing on this permit may not have expired by the date of issuance. A potential petitioner has twenty -six (26) days from the date on which the actual notice is deposited in the mail, or twenty -one (21) days from publication of this notice when actual notice is not provided, within which to file a petition for an administrative hearing pursuant to Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statutes. Receipt of such a petition by the District may result in this permit becoming null and void. Permit issuance does not relieve you from the responsibility of obtaining permits from any federal, state and /or local agencies asserting c©ncurrent jurisdiction over this work. The enclosed permit is a legal document and should be kept with your other important records. Please read the permit and conditions carefully since the referenced conditions may require submittal of additional information. All information submitted as compliance with permit conditions must be submitted to the nearest District Service Center and should include the above referenced permit number. Sincerely, *��p4vAfA�- Gloria Lewis, Director Permit Data Services Division Enclosures: Permit, Conditions for Issuance, Compliance Forms, Map, Well Tags cc: District Permit File ,agent: CPH Engineers, Inc. 1117 E. Robinson Street Orlando, FL 32801 COVE NiNG BOARD AVED An 3 0 107 David G. Graham. MAIRMAN John G. 5owlnskl, VICE CHAIRMAN Ann I Moore. SECRETARY DuanO L. otten5tr08r, TREASJRER JACKMINVALE DHLANOG B'JNNELL JI•CKISCAIVILLE R Clay Albright Susan h. Hughes William W. Kerr Omelrlas D Long W. Leonard Wood OCALA RONTE VEDRA VIELBOORNE BEACH APOPKA FERNANUINA BEACH PERMIT ISO.. 105763 DATE ISSUED: April 10.2007 PROJECT NAME: City of Winter S rin s Reclaimed Water Augmentation A PERMIT AUTHORIZING: The District authorizes, as limited by the attached permit conditions, the use of 813.95 million gallons per year (mgy) (2.23 million gallons per day (mgd) average) of combined surface water from Lake Jesup and artesian well water for irrigation type use. LOCATION: Site: City of Winter Springs Reclaimed Water A Seminole County Section(s): 26 Township(s): 20S Range(s): 30E ISSUED TO: City of Winter Springs 1126 E SR 434 Winter Springs, FL 32708 Permittee agrees to hold and save the St. Johns River Water Management District and its successors harmless from any and all damages, claims, or liabilities which may arise from permit issuance. Said application, including all maps and specifications attached thereto, is by reference made a part hereof. This permit does not convey to penmittee any property rights nor any rights of privileges other' than those specified herein, nor relieve the permittee from complying with any law, regulation or requirement affecting the rights of other bodies or agencies. All structures and works installed by permittee hereunder shall remain the property of the permittee. This permit may be revoked, modified or transferred at any time pursuant to the appropriate provisions of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes and 40CA Florida Administrative Code. PERMIT IS CONDITIONED UPON: See conditions on attached "Exhibit A ", dated April 10, 2007 AUTHORIZED BY: By: St. Johns River Water Management District Department of Resource Management By: ! Kirby B. Green, III Executive Director "EXHIBIT A" CONDITIONS FOR ISSUANCE OF PERMIT DUMBER. 105763 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS DATED APRIL 10, 2007 1. District Authorized staff, upon proper identification, will have permission to enter, inspect and observe permitted and related facilities in order to determine compliance with the approved plans, specifications and conditions of this permit. 2. Nothing in this permit should be construed to limit the authority of the St. Johns River Water Management District to declare a water shortage and issue orders pursuant to Section 373.175, Florida Statutes, or to formulate a plan for implementation during periods of water shortage, pursuant to Section 373.245, Florida Statutes. In the event a water shortage, is declared by the District Governing Board, the permittee must adhere to the water shortage restriction as specified by the District, even though the specified water shortage restrictions may be inconsistent with the terms and conditions of this permit. 3. Prior to the construction, modification. or abandonment of a well, the permittee must obtain a Water Well Construction Permit from the St. Johns River Water Management District, or the appropriate local government pursuant to Chapter 40C -3, Florida Administrative Code. Construction, modification, or abandonment of a well will require modification of the consumptive use permit when such construction, modification or abandonment is other than that specified and described on the consumptive use permit application form, 4. Leaking or inoperative well casings, valves, or controls must be repaired or replaced as required to eliminate the leak or make the system fully operational. 5. Legal uses of water existing at the time of the permit application may not be interfered with by the consumptive use. If unanticipated interference occurs, the District may revoke the permit in whole or in part to curtail or abate the interference unless the permittee mitigates for the interference. In those cases where other permit holders are identified by the District as also contributing to the interference, the permittee may choose to mitigate in a cooperative effort with these other permittees. The permittee must submit a mitigation plan to the District for approval prior to implementing such mitigation. 6. Off -site land uses existing at the time of permit application may not be significantly adversely impacted as a result of the consumptive use. If unanticipated significant adverse impacts occur, the District shall revoke the permit in whole or in part to curtail or abate the adverse Impacts, unless the impacts can be mitigated by the permittee. 7. The District must be notified, in writing, within 30 days of any sale, conveyance, or other transfer of a well or facility from which the permitted consumptive use is made or within 30 days of any transfer of ownership or control of the real property at which the permitted consumptive use is located. All transfers of ownership or transfers of permits are subject to the provisions of section 40C- 1.612, Florida Administrative Code. S. A District - issued identification tag shall be prominently displayed at each withdrawal site by permanently affixing such tag to the pump, headgate, valve or other withdrawal facility as provided by Section 40C- 2,401, Florida Administrative Code. Permittee shall notify the District in the event that a replacement tag is needed. 9. Landscape irrigation is prohibited between the hours of 10 :00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., except as follows: (a) Irrigation using a micro - irrigation system is allowed anytime. (b) The use of reclaimed water for irrigation is allowed anytime, provided appropriate signs are placed on the property to inform the general public and District enforcement personnel of such use. Such signs must be in accordance with local restrictions. (c) Irrigation of, or in preparation for planting, new landscape is allowed any time of day for one 30 day period provided irrigation is limited to the amount necessary for plant establishment. (d) Watering in of chemicals, including insecticides, pesticides, fertilizers, fungicides, and herbicides when required by law, the manufacturer, or best management practices is allowed anytime within 24 hours of application. (e) Irrigation systems may be operated anytime for maintenance and repair purposes not to exceed ten minutes per hour per zone. 10. All submittals made to demonstrate compliance with this permit must have the CUP number 105763 clearly labeled on the submittal. 11. This permit will expire on April 10, 2027. 12, The combined maximum annual withdrawals of surface water from Lake Jesup plus groundwater from the existing free - flowing artesian well, as described in the application, to supplement the City of Winter Springs reclaimed water system must not exceed: 87.60 million gallons (0.24 million gallons per day average) in 2008, 87.60 million gallons (0.24 million gallons per day average) in 2009, 113.15 million gallons (0.31 million gallons per day average) in 2010, 102.20 million gallons (0.28 million gallons per day average) in 2011, 273.75 million gallons (0.75 million gallons per day average) in 2012, 262.80 million gallons (0.72 million gallons per day average) in 2013, 430.70 million gallons (1.18 million gallons per day average) in 2014, 419.75 million gallons (1.15 million gallons per day average) in 2015, 587.65 million gallons (1.61 million gallons per day average) in 2016, 573.05 million gallons (1.57 million gallons per day average) in 2017, 726.35 million gallons (1.99 million gallons per day average) in 2018, 715.40 million gallons (1.96 million gallons per day average) in 2019, and 813.95 million gallons (2.23 million gallons per day average) in 2020 through 2027. 13. The permittee may use flow from the free- flowing artesian well (District GRS ID 104913), as described in the permit application, to supplement the reclaimed water system whenever the demand for reclaimed water exceeds the quantity of treated wastewater available from the City's waste water treatment facilities. The free - flowing artesian well may not be pumped or otherwise used to produce more than its free flowing rate at anytime. The well must be allowed to flow into Lake Jesup when flow from the well is not being used to supplement the reclaimed system. 14. The permittee must ensure that all supply line and distribution connections that augment and distribute the reclaimed service are metered, including the artisan well flow both into the system and into Lake Jesup via the bypass. 15. The permittee must maintain all flow meters. In case of failure or breakdown of any meter, the District must be notified in writing within 5 days of its discovery. A defective meter must be repaired or replaced within 30 days of its discovery. 16. The permittee must have the flowmeters checked for accuracy every 3 years within 30 days of the anniversary date of permit issuance, and recalibrated if the difference between the actual flow and the meter reading is greater than 5 %. District Form No. EN -51 must be submitted to the District within 10 days of the inspection /calibration. 17. Total withdrawals from all pumps, which may include all or some of the following supply pumps, Pump 1 (District GRS ID 104702), Pump 2 (District GRS ID 104703), Pump 3 (District GRS ID 104704), Pump 7 (District GRS ID 104885) and Pump 8 (District GRS ID 104886), , free - flowing artesian well (District GRS ID 104913) must be recorded continuously, totaled monthly, and reported to the District at least every six months from the initiation of the monitoring using Form EN -50. The reporting dates each year will be as follows for the duration of the permit: Reporting Period Report Due Date January — June July 31 July — December January 31 18. The permittee's consumptive use shall not adversely impact wetlands, lakes, and spring flows or cause or contribute to a violation of minimum flows and levels adopted in Chapter 40C -8, F,A.C., except as authorized by an SJRWMD- approved minimum flow or level (MFL) recovery strategy. If unanticipated significant adverse impacts occur, the SJRINMD shall revoke the permit in whole or in part to curtail or abate the adverse impacts, unless the impacts can be mitigated by the permittee. 19. All available lower quality sources of water including reclaimed water and storm water must be distributed for use, or used by the applicant in place of higher quality water sources when deemed feasible pursuant to District rules and applicable state law. 20. The permittee must conduct a detailed water audit of the reclaimed water system in 2010, 2013, 2016, 2019, 2022 and 2025 and submit it to the District by February 15th of the following year. All water uses given in the audit must be for the previous calendar year and documentation provided on how the amounts were metered or determined. If the water audit shows that the system losses and unaccounted for water utility uses exceed 10 %, a leak detection and repair program must be implemented within one year. 21. The permittee must adopt an ordinance that prohibits the use of potable water for irrigation purposes if reclaimed water is available. The permittee shall submit a draft of the ordinance to the District for review and approval by October 31, 2007. The permittee shall adopt an ordinance, as approved by the District no later than April 10, 2008, 22. The permittee must submit, to the District, a compliance report pursuant to subsection 373.236(3), F.S., every five years during the term of the permit. The permittee shall submit the report by July 31st of the required years. The report shall contain sufficient information to demonstrate that the permittee's use of surface water will continue for the duration of the permit to meet the conditions of permit issuance set forth in the District rules that existed at the time the permit was issued for 20 years by the District. At a minimum the compliance report must include: (a) A description of the current reclaimed water supply and delivery system and annual flow amounts for the previous 5 years; (b) Provide documentation that the artesian well was used only when the demand for reclaimed water exceeded the quantity of treated wastewater available from the City's waste water treatment facilities, that the well was not allowed to flow more than the well's free flowing rate, and that the well was allowed to flow into Lake Jesup when flow from the well was not used to augment the reclaimed system; (c) Documentation describing all activities taken during the previous five years to further develop alternative water supplies by the permittee, including but not limited to planning, design, financing and project schedules; (d) documentation verifying that the sources are capable of supplying the needs authorized by this permit without causing significant harm to water and water related resources; (e) Documentation verifying that the use of augmentation water is efficient and that the permittee is implementing all feasible water conservation .measures; (f) An updated analysis demonstrating that the augmentation allocations as set forth in the permit do not cause unacceptable impacts to springs, wetlands and lakes; (g) Information documenting that the augmentation allocations as set forth in the permit are needed for the remainder of the permit. City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan City of Winter Springs — Water Supply Plan WINTER SPRINGS ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT Describe ProjectlProposal The purpose of this report is to comply with Year 2002 legislation to amend the local comprehensive plans to include a ten -year water supply plan as part of the Potable Water Element and make other amendments as required /needed within 18 months of an adopted Regional Water Supply Plan (RWSP). The goal is to ensure that long -term planning for needed water supplies and facilities matches current planning activities and development approvals. The new RWSP was adopted in December 2015. Describe the Direct Economic Impact-of the Project/Proposal upon the Operation of the Clty There is no direct economic impact as a result of this amendment. Describe the Direct Economic Impact of the ProjecVProposal upon the Property Owners/Tax Pavers /Citizens who are Expected to be Affected There is no direct economic impact as a result of this amendment to the property owners /tax payers /citizen of this City. Identify Any Potential Indirect Economic Impacts, Positive or Negative, Which Might Occur as a Result of the Adoption of the Ordinance The extended planning horizon and potential for coordination with local and regional water supplies and users is expected to have a neutral -to- positive economic impact. Citation None. City of Winter Springs —Water Supply Plan b b a l u a 3m s '�T imon 9a � m ❑ — g m v n D� �O mm ;o :� CZ m <m z W L7 N 9 c m m zz 0 c m m n m 1 1 1 ■ ■ ■ ■ LEGEND COMMERVAL CONSERVATION HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL FNDUSTRIAL LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL - MIXED USE - REGREATION PUBLIC RURAL RESIDENTIAL SEMI - PUBLIC FACILITIES TOWN CENTER DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ElGREENWAY INTERCHANGE DISTRICT I 1 • ati^ APPEN, DIX 0 Vilh-111 Rhaoced Environmental 10horatories, Inc. April 23, 2015 Waylon Locklear City of Winter Springs 1126 East SR 434 Winter Springs, FL 32708 RE: Workorder: A1502301 VNINTER SPRINGS Dear Waylon Locklear Advanced Environmental Laboratories, Inc 528 S. North BI, Ste 1016 Altamonte Springs, FL 32701 Payments: P.O. Box 551580 Jacksonville, FL 32255 -1580 Phone: (407)937 -1594 Fax: (407)937-1597 Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) received by the laboratory on Wednesday, April 08, 2015. Results reported herein conform to the most current NELAC standards, where applicable, unless otherwise narrated in the body of the report. The analytical results for the samples contained in this reporl were submitted for analysis as outlined by the Chain of Custody and results pertain only to these samples. If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Brandon O'Hara BOHaraQ?AELLab.com Enclosures. Subiab report and case narrative Report ID: 363081 - 5344810 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Advanced Environmental Laboratories, Inc. Wg ♦N kGtpq n s z Page 1 of 14 3004.1.0.0 Ndvaoced hvironmeotal [aharatories, Inc. SAMPLE SUMMARY Workorder: A1502301 WINTER SPRINGS Advanced Environmental Laboratories, Inc 528 S. North Bt, Ste 1016 Altamonte Springs, FL 32701 Payments: P.O. Box 551580 Jacksonville, FL 32255 -1580 Phone: (407)937 -1594 Fax: (407)937 -1597 Lab ID Sample ID Matrix Date Collected Date Received A1502301001 WELL 1E Drinking Water 4;812015 11:03 418!2015 15:23 A1502301002 WELL 2E Drinking Water 418/2015 12:17 4/8/2015 15 :23 A1502301003 WELL 3E Drinking Water 4/8/2015 11:38 418/2015 15:23 A1502301004 WELL 4E Drinking Water 4/8/2015 11:58 4/812015 15:23 A1502301005 POE Drinking Water 4/13/2015 12:30 4/8/2015 15:23 Report ID: 363081 - 5344810 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Advanced Environmental Laboratories, Inc. O aq wCCaAe4 S Page 2 of 14 3004.1.0.0 Bdtanced Environmental Lahorataries, Inc. Workorder: A1502301 WINTER SPRINGS Lab ID: A1502301001 Sample ID: WELL 1E Advanced Environmental Laboratories, Inc 528 S. North BI, Ste 1016 Altamonte Springs, FL 32701 Payments: P.D. Box 551580 Jacksonvifle, FL 32255 -1580 Phone: (407)937 -1594 Fax: (407)937 -1597 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Date Received: 04108115 15:23 Matrix: Drinking Water Date Col6ected: 04/08/15 11:03 Sample Description, Location: Adjusted Adjusted Parameters Results Qual Units DF PQL MDL Analyzed Lab METALS Analysis Desc: E200.7 Analysis,Drinking Analytical Method: EPA 200.7 Water(w /Prep) Calcium 44 mg1L 1 0.20 0.10 41231201512:46 M Iron 0.020 U mg/L 1 0.20 0.020 41231201512:46 M Magnesium 10 mg1L 1 0.20 0.046 4/231201512:46 M Sodium 20 mg /L 1 0.20 0.010 4/23/201512:46 M METALS, DISSOLVED Analysis Desc: E200.7 Preparation Method: EPA 200.7 Analysis, Dissolved Analytical Method: EPA 200.7 Iron 0.051 1 mg /L 1 0.20 0.020 4123/201513:46 M WET CHEMISTRY Analysis Desc: IC,E300.0.Water Analytical Method: EPA 300.0 Chloride 38 mg /L 1 7.5 0.78 4/8/2015 21:46 A Orthophosphate 0.23 J3 mg /L 1 0.094 418/2015 21:46 A Sulfate 11 mg /L 1 5.0 0.52 4/8/2015 21:46 A Analysis Desc: Ammonia,E350.1,Water Analytical Method EPA 350.1 Ammonia (N) 0.27 mg1L 1 0.10 0.02 4/9/2015 13:27 T Analysis Desc: Analytical Method: SM 23208 Alkalinity,SM2320B, Water Alkalinity, Total 130 mg /L 1 20 5.0 4/15/2015 10:12 T Analysis Desc: Tot Dissolved Analytical Method: SM 2540 C Solids,SM2540C Total Dissolved Solids 240 mg /L 1 10 10 4/9/2015 08:45 A Analysis Desc: SulfEde,SM4500S- Analytical Method: SM 4500 -S D D,Aqueous Sulfide 1.9 m911- 2 0.10 0.012 4/151201511:08 T Report ID: 363081 - 5344810 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Advanced Environmental Laboratories, Inc. w N c y rF Page 3 of 14 3004.1 .0 -0 .� Rhanced hiruemental laburaturies, Inc. Workorder: A1502301 WINTER SPRINGS Lab ID: A1502301002 Sample ID WELL 2E Advanced Environmental Laboratories, Inc 528 S. North BI, Ste 1016 Altamonte Springs, FL 32701 Payments: P.O. Box 551580 Jacksonville, FL 32255 -1580 Phone: (407)937-1594 Fax: (407)937-1597 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Date Received 04/08/15 15:23 Matrix: Drinking Water Date Collected 04/08/15 12:17 Sample Description Location: Adjusted Adjusted Parameters Results Qual Units DF PQL MDL Anaiyzed Lab METALS Analysis Desc: E200.7 Ana lysis,Drinking Analytical Method: EPA 200.7 Water (w /Prep) Calcium 46 mg1L 1 0.20 0.10 4/231201512:50 M Iron 0.042 I mg1L 1 0.20 0.020 41231201512:50 M Magnesium 11 mg1L 1 0.20 0.046 4/23/201512:50 M Sodium 28 mg1L 1 0.20 0.010 4/23/201512 :50 M METALS, DISSOLVED Analysis Desc: E200.7 Preparation Method: EPA 200.7 Analysis, Dissolved Analytical Method: EPA 200.7 Iron 0.033 1 mg1L 1 0.20 0.020 4123/201513:53 M WET CHEMISTRY Analysis Desc: IC,E300.0,Water Analytical Method: EPA 300.0 Chloride 54 mg1L 1 7.5 0.78 418/2015 22:10 A Orthophosphate 0.27 J3 mg1L 1 0.094 4/8/2015 22:10 A Sulfate 14 mg /L 1 5.0 0.52 4/8/2015 22:10 A Analysis Desc: Ammonia,E350.1,Water Analytical Method: EPA 350.1 Ammonia (N) 0.25 mg /L 1 0.10 0.02 419!2015 13:27 T Analysis Desc: Analytical Method: SM 23206 Alkalln ity,SM2320B, Water Alkalinity, Total 130 mg1L 1 20 5.0 4/15/2015 10:17 T Analysis Desc: Tot Dissolved Analytical Method: SM 2540 C Solids,SM2540C Total Dissolved Solids 280 mg1L 1 10 10 4/9/2015 08:45 A Analysis Desc: Sulfide,SM4500S- Analytical Method SM 4500 -S D D,Aqueous Sulfide 2.6 mglL 5 0.25 0.031 4/15/201511:08 T Report ID: 363081 - 5344810 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Advanced Environmental Laboratories, Inc - `�C N AGCp7 ? spa x Page 4 of 14 3004.1.0.0 Advanced Environmental Laboratories, Inc rift 528 $. North BI, Ste 1016 Altamonte Springs, FL 32701 fldvanced Payments: P.O. Box 551580 Jacksonville, PL 32255 -1580 WLSP7 Environmental laboratories, Inc. Phone: (407)937 -1594 Fax: (407)937 -1597 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Workorder: A1502301 WINTER SPRINGS Lab ID: A1502301003 Sample ID: WELL 3E Sample Description: Date Received: Date Collected: Location: 04/08/15 15:23 04/08/15 11:38 Matrix: Drinking Water Adjusted Adjusted Parameters Results Qual Units DF PQL MDL Analyzed Lab METALS Analysis Desc: E200.7 Analysis,Drinking Analytical Method: EPA 200.7 Water (wlPrep) Calcium 45 mglL 1 0.20 0.10 41231201512:54 M Iron 0.020 U mglL 1 0.20 0.020 41231201512:54 M Magnesium 11 mglL 1 0.20 0.046 41231201512:54 M Sodium 29 mglL 1 0.20 0.010 41231201512:54 M METALS, DISSOLVED Analysis Desc: E200.7 Preparation Method: EPA 200.7 Analysis,Dissotved Analytical Method: EPA 200.7 Iron 0.020 U mglL 1 0.20 0.020 4/231201513:57 M WET CHEMISTRY Analysis Desc: IC,E300.0,Water Analytical Method: EPA 300.0 Chloride 56 mglL 1 7.5 0.78 4191201518:41 A Orthophosphate 0.52 mglL 1 0.094 4191201518;41 A Sulfate 14 mglL 1 5.0 0.52 4191201518:41 A Analysis Desc: Ammonia,E350.1,Water Analytical Method: EPA 350.1 Ammonia (N) 0.29 mglL 1 0.10 0.02 4/9/2015 13:27 T Analysis Desc; Analytical Method: SM 2320B Alkalinity, SM2320B, Water Alkalinity, Total 130 mglL 1 20 5.0 4/1512015 10:21 T Analysis Desc: Tot Dissolved Analytical Method: SM 2540 C Solids,SM2540C Total Dissolved Solids 250 mg1L 1 10 10 4/9/2015 08:45 A Analysis Desc: Sulfide,SM450OS- Analytical Method: SM 4500 -5 D D,Aqueous Sulfide 2.7 mglL 5 0.25 0.031 4115120151108 T Report ID: 363081 - 5344810 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Advanced Environmental Laboratories, Inc. Page 5 of 14 3004.1.0.0 �_ — �duaacad E�viraamental laharatariaa, Inc, ANALYTICAL RESULTS Workorder A1502301 WINTER SPRINGS Advanced Environmental Laboratories, Inc 528 S. North BI, Ste 1016 Altamonte Springs, FL 32701 Payments: P.O. Box 551580 Jacksonville, FL 32255 -1580 Phone: (407)937-1594 Fax: (407)937-1597 Lab ID: A1502301004 Date Received: 04/08/15 15:23 Matrix Drinking Water Sample ID: WELL 4E Date Collected: 04/08/15 11:58 Sample Description: Location: Adjusted Adjusted Parameters Results Qual Units DF PQL MDL Analyzed Lab METALS Analysis Desc: E200.7 Ana lysis,Drinking Water(w /Prep) Calcium Iron Magnesium Sodium METALS, DISSOLVED Analysis Desc: E200.7 Analysis, Dissolved Iron WET CHEMISTRY Analysis Desc: IC,E300.0,Water Chloride Orthophosphate Sulfate Analysis Desc: Ammonia,E350.1,Water Ammonia (N) Analysis Desc: Alkalinity,SM23208, Water Alkalinity, Total Analysis Desc: Tot Dissolved Solids,SM2540C Total Dissolved Solids Analysis Desc: Sulfide,SM450DS- D,Aqueous Sulfide Report ID: 363081 - 5344810 Analytical Method. EPA 200.7 43 mglL 1 0.20 0.10 41231201512:58 M 0.21 mg1L 1 0.20 0.020 41231201512:58 M 11 rrtglL 1 0.20 0.046 4/23/201512:58 M 29 mglL 1 0.20 0.010 4/231201512:58 M Preparation Method: EPA200.7 Analytical Method: EPA 2001 0.13 1 mglL 1 0.20 0.020 4!231201514:01 M Analytical Method: EPA 300.0 52 mglL 1 7.5 0.78 4191201519:05 A 0.57 mglL 1 0.094 4191201519:05 A 13 mglL 1 5.0 0.52 4191201519:05 A Analytical Method EPA 350.1 0.24 mg1L 1 0.10 0.02 4191201513:27 T Analytical Method: SM 2320B 120 mglL 1 20 5.0 41151201510:26 T Analytical Method. SM 2540 C 270 mg1L 1 10 10 4!912015 08:45 A Analytical Method SM 45DO -S D 2.8 mglL 5 0.25 0.031 41151201511:08 T CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Advanced Environmental Laboratories, Inc. `EV ip IICtpAQi c x Page 6 of 14 3004.1.0.0 Maud _� hiroomeotal [ahoratories, Inc. Workordec A1502301 WINTER SPRINGS Lab ID: A1502301005 Sample ID: POE Advanced Environmental Laboratories, Inc 528 S. North 81, Ste 1016 Altamonte Springs, FL 32701 Payments: P.O. Box 551580 Jacksonville, FL 32255 -1580 Phone: (407)937-1594 Fax: (407)937 -1597 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Date Received: 04108/15 15:23 Matrix: Drinking Water Date Collected: 04/08/15 12:30 Sample Description: Location: Adjusted Adjusted Parameters Results Qual Units DE PQL MDL Analyzed Lab METALS Analysis Desc E200.7 Analysis,Drinking Analytical Method EPA 200 7 Water(wlPrep) Calcium 44 mglL 1 0.20 0.10 41231201513:01 M Iron 0.020 U mglL f 0.20 0.020 4123/201513:01 M Magnesium 10 mglL 1 0.20 0.046 41231201513:01 M Sodium 31 mglL 1 0.20 0.010 4/231201513:01 M METALS, DISSOLVED Analysis Desc: E200.7 Preparation Method: EPA 200.7 Analysis,Dissolved Analytical Method: EPA 200.7 Iron 0.020 U mg1L 1 0.20 0.020 4123/201514:04 M WET CHEMISTRY Analysis Desc: IC,E300.0,Water Analytical Method: EPA 300.0 Chloride 54 mglL 1 7.5 0.78 4/91201519:30 A Orthophosphate 0.21 mglL 1 0.094 4191201519:30 A Sulfate 12 mg1L 1 5.0 0.52 4191201519:30 A Analysis Desc: Ammonia, E350.1,Water Analytical Method: EPA 350.1 Ammonia (N) 0.02 U mg1L 1 0.10 0.02 4/9/2015 13:27 T Analysis Desc: Analytical Method: SM 2320H Alkalinity SM23206,Water Alkalinity, Total 130 mglL 1 20 5.0 4/15/2015 10:30 T Analysis Desc: Tot Dissolved Analytical Method: SM 2540 C Solids,SM2540C Total Dissolved Solids 260 mg1L 1 10 10 4/9/2015 08:45 A Analysis Desc: Suffide,SM45DOS- Analytical Method: SM 4500 -S D D,Aqueous Sulfide 0.074 mg1L 1 0.050 0.0062 41151201511:08 T Report ID: 363081 - 5344810 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Advanced Environmental Laboratories, Inc. M1 a.n acca�ai c` n a x Page 7 of 14 3004.1.0.0 honced Enuirmeatal laboratories, Inc. Workorder: A1502301 WINTER SPRINGS PARAMETER QUALIFIERS Advanced Environmental Laboratories, Inc 528 S. North BI, Ste 1016 Altamonte Springs, FL 32701 Payments: P.O. Box 551580 Jacksonville, FL 32255 -1580 Phone: (407)9371594 Fax: (407 )937 -1597 ANALYTICAL RESULTS QUALIFIERS U The compound was analyzed for but not detected. I The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quantitation limit. J3 Lab QC Failure LAB QUALIFIERS A DOH Certification #E53076(AEL -A)(FL NELAC Certification) M DOH Certification #E82535(AEL -M)(FL NELAC Certification) T DOH Certification #E84589(AEL -T)(FL NELAC Certification) Report ID: 363081 - 534481 0 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Advanced Environmental Laboratories, Inc_ in •ceaw °gym t � Page 8 of 14 3004.1.0.0 Advanced Environmental Laboratories, Inc 528 S. North BI, Ste 1016 Altamonte Springs, FL 32701 �l I �Va�Ced Payments: P.Q. Box 551580 Jacksonville, FL 32255 -1560 11 Inviraamental laboratories, Inc, Phone: (407)937 -1594 Fax: (407)937 -1597 QUALITY CONTROL DATA Workorder: A1502301 WINTER SPRINGS QC Batch: WCAt12608 Analysis Method: EPA 350.1 QC Batch Method: EPA 350.1 Prepared: Associated Lab Samples: A1502301001, A1 50230 1 002, A1502301003, A15O2301004, A15O2301005 METHOD BLANK: 1721791 Blank Reporting Parameter Units Result Limit Qualifiers WET CHEMISTRY Ammonia (N) mg /L 0.02 0.02 U QC Batch WCAa11258 Analysis Method: SM 2540 C QC Batch Method: SM 2540 C Prepared: Associated Lab Samples: A1502301001, A1502301002, A1502301003, A1502301004, A15O2301005 METHOD BLANK: 1724662 Blank Reporting Parameter Units Result Limit Qualifiers WET CHEMISTRY Total Dissolved Solids mglL 10 10 U QC Batch: WCAt/2674 Analysis Method: SM 2320B QC Batch Method: SM 2320B Prepared: Associated Lab Samples: A1502301001, A1502301002, A1502301 D03, A1502301004, Al 502301005 METHOD BLANK: 1724790 Blank Reporting Parameter Units Result Limit Qualifiers WET CHEMISTRY Alkalinity, Total mglL 5.0 5.0 U QC Batch: WCAU2699 Analysis Method: 5M 4500 -S D QC Batch Method: SM 4500 -S D Prepared: Associated Lab Samples: A1502301001, A1502301002, A15O2301003, A1502301004, A1502301005 METHOD BLANK: 1726147 Blank Reporting Parameter Units Result Limit Qualifiers WET CHEMISTRY Report ID: 363081 - 5344810 Page 9 of 14 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Advanced Environmental Laboratories, Inc. a `�O ♦K iCfOAOYbi F 3004.1.0.0 Rhanred frivironmental [ahoratorin, Inc. QUALITY CONTROL DATA Workorder: A1502301 WINTER SPRINGS METHOD BLANK: 1726147 Blank Reporting Parameter Units Result Limit Qualifiers Sulfide mg /L 0.0062 0.0062 U Advanced Environmental Laboratories, Inc 528 S. North BI, Ste 1016 Altamonte Springs, FL 32701 Payments: P.O. Box 551580 Jacksonville, FL 32255 -1580 Phone: (407937 -1594 Fax: (407)937 -1597 QC Batch: ICPm /1109 Analysis Method. EPA 200 7 QC Batch Method; EPA 200.7 Prepared: Associated Lab Samples: A1502301001 A1502301002. Al 502301003, Al 502301 004, Al 502301005 METHOD BLANK: 1727009 Parameter Units Blank Reporting Result Limit Qualifiers METALS Calcium mg /L 0.10 0.10 U Iron mg /L 0.020 0.020 U Magnesium mg /L 0.046 0.046 U Sodium mg/L- 0.10 0.10 U QC Batch: WCAa /1281 Analysis Method: EPA 300.0 QC Batch Method: EPA 300.0 Prepared: Associated Lab Samples: A1502301003, A1502301004, A1502301005 METHOD BLANK: 1730081 Blank Reporting Parameter Units Result Limit Qualifiers WET CHEMISTRY Chloride mglL 018 0.78 U Orthophosphate mg1L 0.094 0.094 U Sulfate mg /L 0,52 0.52 U QC Batch: WCAa /1283 Analysis Method: EPA 300,0 QC Batch Method: EPA300.0 Prepared: Associated Lab Samples: A1502301001, A1502301002 METHOD BLANK: 1730158 Blank Reporting Parameter Units Result Limit Qualifiers WET CHEMISTRY Chloride mg /L 0.78 0 78 U Report ID: 363081 - 5344810 Page 10 of 14 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except it full, without the written consent of Advanced Environmental Laboratories, Inc. ip accow < s 3004.1.0.0 Advanced Environmental Laboratories, Inc _ 528 S. North BI, 5to 1016 Altamonte Springs, FL 32701 Hdvaaced Inc. Payments: P.O. Box 551580 Jacksonville, FL 32255 -1580 Environmental laboratories IIb Phone: (407)937 -1594 Fax: (407)937 -1597 QUALITY CONTROL DATA Workorder: A1502301 WINTER SPRINGS METHOD BLANK: 1730158 Blank Reporting Parameter Units Result Limit Qualifiers Orthophosphate mg /L 0.094 0.094 U Sulfate mg /L 0.52 0.52 U QC Batch: DGMm11116 Analysis Method: EPA 200.7 QC Batch Method: EPA 200.7 Prepared: 04122/2015 10:00 Associated Lab Samples: Al 502301001, A1502301002, Al 502301003, Al 502301004, Al 502301005 METHOD BLANK: 1732931 Blank Reporting Parameter Units Result Limit Qualifiers Iron mg /L 0.020 0.020 U QUALITY CONTROL DATA QUALIFIERS Workorder: A1502301 WINTER SPRINGS QUALITY CONTROL PARAMETER QUALIFIERS U The compound was analyzed for but not detected. I The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quantitation limit. J3 Lab QC Failure Report ID: 363081 - 5344810 CERTIFICATE Of ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Advanced Environmental Laboratories, Inc. ' c° .n scro4a� Page 11 of 14 3604.1,0.0 Advanced Environmental Laboratories, Inc 528 S. North BI, Ste 1016 Altamonte Springs, FL 32701 Air I O Bdvaaead Payments: P.O. Box 551580 Jacksonville, FL 32255 -1580 Environmental laboratories, Inc. Phone: (407)937 -1594 Fax: (407)937 -1597 QUALITY CONTROL DATA CROSS REFERENCE TABLE Workorder: A1502301 WINTER SPRINGS Lab ID Sample ID Prep Method Prep Batch Analysis Method Analysis Batch A1502301001 WELL 1E EPA 350.1 WCAt/2608 A1502301002 WELL 2E EPA 350.1 WCAU2608 A1502301003 WELL 3E EPA 350.1 WCAt/2608 A1502301004 WELL 4E EPA 350.1 WCAt/2608 A1502301005 POE EPA 350.1 WCAt/2608 A1602301001 WELL 1E SM 2540C WCAa /1258 A1502301002 WELL 2E SM 2540 C WCAa /1258 A1502301003 WELL 3E SM 2540 C WCAa /1258 A1502301004 WELL 4E SM 2540 C WCAa/1258 A1502301005 POE SM 2540 C WCAa /1258 A1502301001 WELL 1E SM 2320B WCAY2674 A1502301002 WELL 2E SM 23206 WCAt/2674 A1502301003 WELL 3E SM 2320B WCAU2674 A1502301004 WELL 4E SM 2320B WCAU21374 A1502301005 POE SM 2320B WCAU2674 A1502301001 WELL 1 E SM 4500 -S D WCAt/2699 A1502301002 WELL 2E SM 4500 -S D WCAt/2699 A1502301003 WELL 3E SM 4500 -S D WCAt/2699 A1502301004 WELL 4E SM 4500 -S D WCAt/2699 A1502301005 POE SM 4500 -S D WCAt/2699 A1502301001 WELL 1E EPA200.7 ICPm/1109 A1502301002 WELL 2F EPA 200.7 ICPm /1109 A1502301003 WELL 3E EPA 200 -7 1CPm11109 A1502301004 WELL 4E EPA 200.7 ICPm/1109 A1502301005 POE EPA 200.7 1CPm /1109 A1502301003 WELL 3E EPA 301 WCAa/1281 A1502301004 WELL 4E EPA 300.0 WCAa/1281 A1502301005 POE EPA 300.0 WCAa /1281 Report ID: 363081 - 5344810 Page 12 of 14 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except In full, without the written conseni of Advanced Environmental Laboratories, Inc. Acco, 3004. t.d.0 Advanced Environmental Laboratories, Inc 528 5. North BI, Ste 1016 Altamonte Springs, FL 32701 Hdvonced Payments: P.O. Box 551580 Jacksonville, FL 32255 -1580 (a Environmental laboratories, Inc. Phone: {407 }937 -1594 Fax: (407)937-1597 QUALITY CONTROL DATA CROSS REFERENCE TABLE Workorder: A1502301 WINTER SPRINGS Analysis Lab ID Sample ID Prep Method Prep Batch Analysis Method Batch A1502301001 WELL 1E EPA 300.0 WCAa11283 A1502301002 WELL 2E EPA 300.0 WCAa11283 A1502301001 WELL 1E EPA 200.7 DGMm11116 EPA 200.7 ICPm11117 A1502301002 WELL 2E EPA 200.7 DGMm /1116 EPA 200.7 ICPm11117 A1502301003 WELL 3E EPA 200.7 DGMm11116 EPA 200,7 ICPm /1117 A1502301004 WELL 4E EPA 2007 DGMm11116 EPA 200 7 ICPm11117 A1502301005 POE EPA 200.7 DGMm11116 EPA 200 7 ICPm11117 Report ID: 363081 - 5344810 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Advanced Environmental Laboratories, Inc. 460 ,p s,cco�as r ti x Page 13 of 14 3004.1.0.0 d] N Q o � N W N 4 LSr W O N v ������� �iMll01111tE;Ii2�lli� i6 5Sg9 9mitlrPa+rt P'avry. - Jvlltm, �l. 9?ii$ +8Cd.383.4061i -FAx Pago,_ 1 9b4�83.S�i4 - ESZST4 FYIN-A. OEM �i iE5.�[!C [ is s- aamn a -ran 19• ®iso�o.eaie•F s,asaa.a32T sat s -EB4$0 � r svr �.•c�er tf - man�,�,w. Fr.3�oa • 9��'r.�w • � as�e3.t�&3a • EB�eo� �r _. 5Z ®S- Haar ia� t»►. S�. 401e • I.7ars>vi� Spdips, FL 32701 • c87.96T.19Bd * Faz Ra'r.507,t397• E536ffi owm RAW-. MY of Winter Springs m w a a rs a ri a a n Icon , m P.G. t4a faw WELT NUMBER. m E E E E 0 E a E `� 1 I +fln �� r4lUiECT 6aG5Tlat¢ � n � V M N r ry NON-- � �CIrJ. C�iPoiE'T,ardi: LJ D: FAX C641TALT, Waylort Looldear w Wq�—cbav; S2 (� +,7� C by 4) TU:t+inkrr+mi i' d -. O co o - (� � CE LL SAMPLE BD Grab SAMPLING SAMPLE DESCRIPTION romp a � h t couT N ZfAc S I iL DATE a ���1� jJ t r V�Gff [G _ k ,'` `« X x X X X x N 2 will # Z lZ,l x X X x X X - 41 3G C-j t j 3 $ `- x x x ?C ai x x WI � �� ��,5 ��.` � �� _ x X x x X x POE- rj f.` 8 ,% X X X X x X X x 1d€NrkC t WM1aw•istawaLc sw =Swfaeawaw Gr- 7codwawa QW =64rsking waAox 0 of A = =air 30 =sdl SL =sarrl2e PrcaenrattonC�a Ea i�o+veeaniee C7r� ansowaAantx�r,sanspla Soacw) S�fFrr3crs7 ++={trta43lTn(sef- JmTSio�drsca' fl Teffo fremiarn2 U-ak ❑ 4'ft" W.Tjkw. PH chi .d temperature when rscelved (In degrees celcltts) Fwm rcAsed 2M40 e�,rrrtt$Tcm �yunl #d'mtary dn�d;`A P — er( - --wFJn—j -;— 6:LT•, LT-2 T;10A 3A FOR DRINKING WATER USE, M' r"M3 9bn wa c�rlso uaokm owns lU. Cunlacl Penpti f'hcae SUOie- aw' Saul. SU Adera� wx tit �1 z a 0 0 co 5 01 02 FYIN-A. OEM P — er( - --wFJn—j -;— 6:LT•, LT-2 T;10A 3A FOR DRINKING WATER USE, M' r"M3 9bn wa c�rlso uaokm owns lU. Cunlacl Penpti f'hcae SUOie- aw' Saul. SU Adera� wx tit �1 z a 0 0 co 5 01 02 Kznrjoorl M "�-�Summrl F'NI IRONNIENIAI ttCH OLOG„ =_S- '�C AraaiyGCO l aborFlWMS April 22, 201 S Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc, 3310 Win St, Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223 TEL (330) 253 -8211 FAX. (330) 253 -4489 Website %tip' /AVtVW- SCttek.com Brandon O Hara Advanced Environmental Laboratories, Inc 528 S North Lake Blvd Suite 1016 Altamonte Springs, FL 32701. TEL: 407 - 937 -1594 FAX: RE: AIS02301 Dear Brandon O Hara: Order No.: 15041021 Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. received 5 sample(s) on 4/10/2015 for the analyses presented in the following report. There were no problems with the analytical events associated with this report unless noted in the Case Narrative. Quality control data is within laboratory defined or method specified acceptance limits except where noted. If you have any questions regarding these tests results, please feet free to call the laboratory. Sincerely, A-,t-, C)�'�� Dr. Mo Osman Project Manager 3310 Win St. Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223 A21-A 0724.01, Alabama 41600, Arizona AZ0788, Arkansas 88 -0735, California 07256CA, Colorado, Connecticut PH -4105, Delaware, Florida NELAC E87688, Georgia ES7688 and 943, Idaho OH00923.. Illinois 200061 and Reg.5, Indiana C- 011-13, Kansas E- 10347, Kentucky (Underground Storage Tank) 3, Kentucky 90146, Louisiana 04061 and LA12004, Maine 2012015, Maryland 339, Massachusetts M- OPH923, Minnesota 409711, Montana CERT0099, New Hampshire 2996, New Jersey OH006, New York 1 1777, North Carolina 39705 and 631, Ohio Drinking Water 4170, Ohio VAP CL0052, Oklahoma 9940, Oregon OH2O0001, Permsylvania 68- 01335, Rhode Island LA000317, South Carolina 92016001, Tennessee TN04018, Texas T104704466-11-5, Region 8 STMS -L, USDAIAPHIS P330-11-00244, Utah 011009232011 -1, Vemtow VT- 87688, Virginia 00440 and 1581, Washington C891, West Virginia 248 and 99570 and E87688, Wisconsin 399013010 Page 1 of 7 Page 2of7 U SMMIlt '°`MRONMENIAL TeCHNOLOG4ES, OVC Analyticsad iaborzraNft Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. 3310 Win St. Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223 TEL: (330) 253 -8211 FAX- (330) 253 -4489 Website: hU.- Ilwww.settek.com W®li L4ol`tl toles Sample Summary WO #: 15041021 22- Apr -I5 CLIENT: Advanced Environmental Laboratories, Inc Project: A1502301 Lab SampleID Client Sample ID Tag No Date Collected Date Received Matrix 15041021 -001 A1502301001 4%8/2015 1 1:03:00 AM 4/10/2015 10:20:00 AM Drinking Water 15041021-002 A1502301002 4/8/2015 12:17:00 PM 4/10/2015 10:20 :00 AM Drinking Water 1 5041 02 1 -003 A1502301003 4/8/2015 11:38:00 AM 4110/2015 10:20:00 AM Drinking Water 15041021 -004 A1502301004 4/8/2015 1.1:58:00 AM 4/10/2015 10:20:00 AM Drinking Water 15041021 -005 A1502301005 41/2015 12:30 :00 PM 4/10/2015 10:20:00 AM Drinking Water Page 2of7 Summit Environmental Technologies. Inc. -, SUMMIT 3310 Win St. ���e I"�T�1�'Ir°atllv+ rkVIROKITA1 NIAI raCki-NOLOGTES, AC, Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223 W 0 151141021 Anaky0c,ol L,aboratorrft TEL: (330) 253 -8211 FAX: (330) 253 -4489 Website: httn: / /www.setfek.com a�tc: 41?2l2(kl5 CLIENT: Advanced Environmental Laboratories, Inc Project: A1502301 This report in its entirety consists of the documents listed below. All documents contain the Sununit Environmental Technologies, Inc., Work Order Number assigned to this report. Paginated Report including Cover Letter, Case Narrative, Analytical Results, Applicable Quality Control Summary Reports, and copies of the Chain of Custody Documents are supplied with this sample set. Concentrations reported with a J -Flag in the Qualifier Field are values below the Limit of Quantitation (LOQ) but greater than the established Method Detection Limit (MDL). Method numbers, unless specified as SM (Standard Methods) or ASTM, are EPA methods. Estimated uncertainty values are available upon request. Analysis performed by DBM, VRM, or SG were performed at Summit Labs 2704 Eatonton Highway Haddock, GA 31033 All results for Solid Samples are reported on an "as received" or "wet weight" basis unless indicated as "dry weight" using the " -dry" designation on the reporting units. Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc., holds the accreditations /certifications listed at the bottom of the cover letter that may or may not pertain to this report. The information contained in this analytical report is the sole property of Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. and that of the customer. It cannot be reproduced in any form without the consent of Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. or the customer for which this report was issued. The results contained in this report are only representative of the samples received. Conditions can vary at different times and at different sampling conditions. Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. is not responsible for use or interpretation of the data included herein. This report is believed to meet all of the requirements of NELAC or the accrediting / certifying agency. Any comments or problems with the analytical events associated with this report are noted below. Original Page 3 of 7 Page 4 of 7 &Mmit Environmental Teehnolagies, Inc. WO #: 15041021 3310 Win St. E.vsl?Y�NMFAITA4'r�C + +NOLC :_5 +� Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223 Date Reported: 4/2212015 RnMy*rrar a eborzrarfas TEL: (330) 253 -8211 FAX. (330) 253 -44 &9 Company: Advanced Environmental Laboratories, In Wr-bsiee: hfoQ /6wimg„=/ekcom Address: 528 S North Lake E3lvd5uite 1016 Altamonte Spring's FL 32701 Received: 4110/2015 Project #: A1502301 Client 1D# Lab ID# Collected Analyte Result Units Qual Matrix Method DF LOD LOQ Run Analyst A1502301001 001 418!2015 Bromide 0.0986 mg1L Drinking Water EPA 300.0 1 O.D500 0.0500 4/17/2015 SG Client ID# Lab ID# Collected Analyte Result Units Qual Matrix Method DF LOD LOQ Run Analyst A1602301002 002 4/812015 Bromide 0.144 mgiL Drinking Water EPA 300.0 1 0.0500 0.0500 4/17/2015 SG Client ID# Lab ID# Collected Analyte Result Units Qua[ Matrix Method DF LOD LOQ Run Analyst A1502501003 D03 41812015 Bromide 0.159 mg/L Drinking Water EPA 300.0 1 0.0540 0.0500 4/17/2015 SG Client ID# Lab ID# Collected Analyte Result Units Qua] Matrix Method DF LOD LOQ Run Analyst A1502301004 004 4/812015 Bromide 0.166 mg/L Drinking Water EPA300.0 1 010500 0.0500 4/1712015 SG Client iD# Lab ED# Collected Analyte Result Units Qual Matrix Method DF LOD LOQ Run Analyst A1502301005 005 4!8!2015 Bromide 0.235 mg/L Drinking Water EPA 300.0 1 0.0500 0.0500 4/1712015 SG Page 4 of 7 Summit Environmental Technologies; 1; c Accreditation Program SUMMIT 3310 fi St Q1� � Report INVIROhMpAL IEt:s!taOLCU ES, %C. Cuyahoga Falls, Ohw44? ' Analytical t.aboratorw TEL: (330) 253 -8211 FAX.- (330) 253 -4489 W01: 15041021 Website: httn: / /tivww.settek.com 22-App-15 Client: Advanced Environmental Laboratories, I Project: A1502301 Program Name Sample ID ClientSample.ID Matrix 'Pest Name Analyte Status Florida DOH 15041021 -OOIA A1502301001 Drinking Water DW Anions Analysis by IC Phosphorus, Total A (300.0) Orthophosphate (As PO4) Nitrogen, Nitrate A Nitrogen, Nitrite A Sulfate A Chloride A Fluoride A Bromide A 15041021-002A A1502301002 Nitrogen, Nitrite A Fluoride A Phosphorus, Total A Orthophosphate (As PO4) Nitrogen, Nitrate A Chloride A Sulfate A Bromide A 15041021 -003A A1502301003 Fluoride A Bromide A Chloride A Phosphorus, Total A Orthophosphate (As PO4) Sulfate A Nitrogen, Nitrite A Nitrogen, Nitrate A 15041021 -004A A1502301004 Sulfate A Bromide A Phosphorus, Total A Orthophosphate (As PO4) Nitrogen, Nitrate A Chloride A Nitrogen, Nitrite A Fluoride A 15041021 -OO5A A1502301005 Nitrogen, Nitrite A Z- NL-LAI A Accredited C Version #15041021# v2 tl Page 5 of 7 � � Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. Acc reditat ➢6II Program =041�1 S 3310 Win St. Analytes, Report "WIRONMIRVAL IECvrjOLaGir:5, ;NC. Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223 Analytfaal LsbcNwforlas TEL: (330) 253 -8211 FAX.- (330) 253 -4489 1'0 #: 15041021 Website: http: / /www.settek.com 22 Apr 15 Client: Advanced Environmental Laboratories, I Project: A1502301 Program Name Sample ID ClientSamplell? Matrix Test Name Analyte status Florida DOH 15041021 -005A A1502301005 Drinking Water DW Anions Analysis by 1C Phosphorus, Total A (300.0) Orthophosphate (As PO4) Bromide A Fluoride A Nitrogen, Nitrate A Sulfate A Chloride A 'L -NELAI A Accredited 0 cc Version #15041021# v2 Page 6of7 Summit Environmental Te�no :: l nc . 3310 7 nSt QC SUMMARY REPORT SUMMI t.MglltptSiMtrNTD,1.TrCN 7p4ervlE&, NC C',,y-nhogaFalls, Ohio 14223 Anrly"CAfLA600rshwift TEL ( 330)25 ?;'?11 F.4X.-(330)'53.44N9 WO #: 1504i021 li E•',;1 , hti(i: H I.._t= 1rn4.r_aor 22 Apw15 Client: Advanced Environmental Laboratories, Inc Project: A1502301 TestCode: Anions_DW(300.0) Sample ID MB- R35753 SampType: MBLK TestCode: Anions_DW( Units: mgfL Prep Date: RunNo: 35753 Client ID: PBW Batch ID: R35753 TestNo: E300.0 Analysis Date: 4117!2015 SegNo: 509609 Analyte Result PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val `YREC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qua[ Bromide ND 0.100 0 0 Sample ID LCS•R35753 SampType: LCS TestCode, Anions_DVJ( Units: mg1L Peep Date: RunNo, 35753 Client ID: LCSW Balch ID: R35753 TestNo E300.0 Analysis Date: 411712015 SegNo: 509610 Analyte, Result PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Low Limit HighLimit RPD Ref Val IARPl7 RPDLimit Qual Bromide 18.7 0.100 20.00 0 93.5 90 110 Sample ID LCSD4R35753 SampType: LCSD TestCode: Anions_DW( Units: mgfL Prep Date: RunNo: 35753 Client ID; LCSS02 Batch ID: R35753 TestNo: E300.0 Analysis Date: 4117!2015 SegNo: 509611 Analyte Result PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val % REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val % RPD RPDLimit Qual Bromide 18.7 0,100 20.00 0 93.3 90 110 18.70 0A81 30 Qualifiers: L­J. H MG \. . _•al,::. i.In (': rnlxrmssi L>mit. Y ,��a. asl�Ina c,:,Gi�.sl:an a.Truds Al. Avyurtiag Iktvtiou Lvrti1 B AI>,— J_I-n,: m lh� x.- :i.'.I�wl k1A o:l Bkk 3 Mnh1-1 -- lvG— gwel�talx>n lulntc NR Not DL—,L i at t6c Rep�rti - Lea PL F-4 S Spire R-.— --O d--ry limbs M hl.ii;., I . ii ,,. .il�i�7m�ema rsepax 0 1001".1 R HPn �ims;�incccptal ecmmry ]imHs V Sa qbi wqi, CelcVWIW11, Original Page 7 of 7 Chain of Custody Document 15299 - HON 11004 Workorder WINTER SPRINGS Results Requested By 4/20=15 •+ .a�„ _• :�.y .� 4 _gin =i <".' rte,': : +:..f _' : -r 5 + _ `% �` Brandon Ohara SUMMIT -Cuyahoga Fa11sOH Advanced Ewronmental Laboratories, Inc Summit Envirorwnental Technoto", Inc. 528 S. North BI, Ste 1016 3310 Win Street A}tammnte Springs, FL 32701 Cuyahoga Fags, OH 44223 Payownts_ Phone RO. Box 551580 Fax Jadwriville, FL 327.55 -1580 �►" e�or Phone (407937-1594 � C� t _. �� >�►1 LAB USE ONLY 5 ii, 1 Wt It "tE 4E12D15 f1 A1;U23t11UlYI,_ ttklkklpVkiler f X 2 WELL 2E 41=15 12:17 JAI502301002 Drink" Mter 1 X a ,WLL 3E 41erf2b #5 "E1.38 t50R ftl t Owft Y wter f j( 4 WEL1_4E M$f2015 11:59 [A45023("004 Drinking Water 1 X POE 4M=15112W I-Rq 006 i3 VWtar 1 X w.„ a Sboftrd lRwft only) St DO Stage 2A Standard MM Rath QC SEDD Map 25 CLP ® SEDD Stagy 3 other #Bluer Pseearvative Trans%m By DstaMme Raeetvad By Datemme 1 tC t asaeeos C 2 3 4 Wednesday, Apr4 06.2015 6'.28:15 PM Page 1 or 1 Rev. 12 Cate: 07127!13 Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. Cooler Receipt Form Client: Initials of parson inspecting C�ooler and samples: Order Number, �1 y� '-L;1 Date Received: Time Receive® t -[V• -ate 000[er(s) opened and samples inspeged Number o sole x85: NIA Shipper: FED EX (12p,_DHI. Airborne US Postal Waik -rn Pickup Other Packaging: Peanuts Paper Foarn None Other,_ Tape ory sp t5ax N NIA Custody Seals intact Y N NIA C -O-C in plastic Y N NIA Ice glue ice reae / a sent r melted N1A Sample Temperature lit Gun #j§QgD459 CF °C °C NIA Radiological Tenting Instrument renal $3Aj?7 (see page 2 for scan results) Y N —Use 1 sheet Per sample for k6dioloocal Testing. It sample is HOT, the Rsdiolttgleal Satbty pier mvst tre notified Irrimadiately. C-O-C filled out properly Samples in separate bags N WA N NIA Sample containers intact` N NIA 'If no, list broken sarnoieis). N Sample label(s) complete (117, date, etc) % ((��vJ N NIA Labei(s) agree with C-O-C N NIA Correct containers us&d N NIA Suffiaentsample received N NIA Subbles absetrt from 40 mL vials— Y N MIA — Samples with bubbles a6mrn are acceptable. indicate bubble size if >6mm. Was client contacted about sampies Y N Will client send new sarnples Y N Client contact Di teffime: Logged in by: CDmrnents: 4b G "= $KARRED00cerneM Control TemplRtea - TradcinglCoaler receipt form Rev. 12 07- 27- 13.4oa Page 1 of 2 Rev, 12 Date; 0727!13 SUMmfi Environmental Technologies, inc. Sample Receipt PH test on samples Radioiogleal scan on sampl$ G.= shAREDvowment contra! Tlmpiates - Tm6dRMC —a- MWIPi farm Rev_ 12 07- 27- 13,dac Page 2 at 2 6801 Southpolnt Parkway Advanced Jacksonville, Florida 32216 + (904) 3539350 Envi ronmenW Labor a�oeies, Inc. FAX (904) 3534354 QCBatch: WCAa -1283 Method: EPA 340.0 PrepMethod: No prep 1. RECEIPT No Exceptions were encountered. II. HOLDING TIMES Preparation: All holding times were met. Anaiysis: All holding times were met. III. PREPARATION Sample preparation proceeded normally. HI. ANALYSIS A. Calibration: All acceptance criierla were met. B. Blanks: All acceptance criteria were met. C. Duplicates: Ali acceptance criteria were met. D. Spikes: When preparing the matrlx spike and duplicate the Cl, SO4 blend ms used twice. There was no matrix spike or duplicate for F. NO2, NO3, or OP for Batch 1283. The recoveries for these analytes In the opening and closing laboratory control samples were in the acceptable 90 -110% range. All samples have been quaiifed to indicate the missing QC for this batch. E. Serial Dilution: All acceptance crteda were met, F. Samples: Sample analyses proceeded normally. G. Other: I certity that this data package is in compliance with the terns and conditions agreed to by Advanced Environmental Laboratories,, Inc. and by the client, both technically and for completeness, except for the conditions detailed above. The Technical Director or his designee, as verified by the following signature, has authorized release of the data contained In this hard copy data package and in the computer- readable data submtted on diskette: APPENI E-NIX E SAS'N117ARY SURVEY DECEIVE L -R 2013 oePer� ;P � 1r r 1 -fix o s o e p�c a tb `r'�ental ` November 8, 2016 Rolrida Department of Env [iran nta0 Piratecua Central District 3319 Maguire Boulevard, Suite 232 Orlando, Florida 32803 -3767 Kipton Lockcuff, P.E., Public Works /Utilities Director City of Winter Springs 1126 East SR 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 klockcuf1La)winters rin sfl.or Re: City of Winter Springs PW #3590879 Seminole County Dear Mr. Lockcuf£ Rick Scott Governor Carlos Lopez - Cantera Lt. Governor Jonathan P. Steverson Secretary Department personnel conducted an inspection of the above- referenced facility on August 11, 2016. Based on the information provided during and following the inspection, the facility was detennined to be in compliance with the Department's rules and regulations. A copy of the inspection form is attached for your records. The Department appreciates your efforts to maintain this facility in compliance with state and federal rules. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact Charles Johnson at 407 -897 -4329 or via e -mail at charles.d.johnson a)�dep.state.fl.us. Sincerely, Reggie Phillips, Manager Central District Florida Department of Environmental Protection Enclosure: Inspection Report cc: Waylon Locklear, Lead Plant Operator, wlockleaz •(c4,wintersRringsfl.org Paul Morrison, Operator, pmorrision (a;wintersnringsil.org Stephanie Monica, Operator, smonica(a >,wintersprin sg floi•g wf4w, dep.state. fl. us State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection Central District SANITARY SURVEY REPORT Plant Name CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS - SHEOAH County Seminole PWS ID # 3590879 -01 Plant Location 700 Sheoah Road, Winter Springs, FL. 32708 Phone 407/327 -2669 Owner Name City of Winter Springs Phone 4071327 -2669 Owner Address 1126 East State Road 434, Winter Springs, FL 32708 ❑ No ❑ NIA Contact Person Kipton Lockcuff Title Utilites Director Phone 407/327 -2669 This Survey Date 8/11/16 Last Survey Date 12/04/13 Last Compliance Inspection Date 10/30/08 PWS TYPE: Community PLANT CATEGORY & CLASS: 5C MAX -DAY DESIGN CAPACITY: 2.736 MGD PWS STATUS: Approved TREATMENT PROCESSES IN USE —. Hypochlorination, aeration, iron sequestration SERVICE AREA CHARACTERISTICS Municipality Food Service: ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A Number of Service Connections 1.1,583_ Population Served 34,657 Basis Census OPERATION & MAINTENANCE LOG: Yes Location Plant Comments CERTIFIED OPERATOR: Yes Operator(s) & Certification Class- Number: Waylon Locklear A -18386 Stephanie Monica C -21653 Hrs /day: Required Visit* Actual Visit* Days /wk: Required 5 +1 Actual 7 Non- consecutive Days? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A Comments *Visits must add up to a cumulative total of at least 0.6 hr /week. MONTHLY OPERATION REPORTS (MORs) MORs submitted regularly? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A Data missing from MORs? El No ❑ Yes ❑ N/A Average Day (from MORs) 811,677 gpd Maximum Day (from MORs) 1,571,000 gpd 5/16 Comments Flow Measuring Device Flow Meter Meter Size & Type 12" GE Panametrics Date Last Calibrated 12/29/11 RAW WATER SOURCE ® GROUND; Number of Wells 2 ❑ PURCHASED from PWS ID # ❑ Emergency Water Source Emergency Water Capacity STANDBY POWER SOURCE: Not Required Source G333 Caterpillar propane motor Model 137813 Capacity of Standby (kW) 145 hsp Switchover: ❑ Automatic ® Manual Mrs Operated Under Load 1 hr /wk. What equipment does it operate? ❑ Well Pumps ® High Service Pumps 3 HSP ❑ Treatment Equipment Satisfy avg. daily demand? ®Yes ❑No ❑Unknown Audio - visual alarm? ®Yes ❑No Comments System is on SCADA Interconnected to the other two plants PLANS AND MAPS Coliform Sampling Plan E Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA D /DBP Monitoring Plan ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A Lead and Copper Plan ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA Distribution System Map ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A Emergency Response Plan ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA Conunents PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE /O &M Operation & Maintenance Manual ® Yes ❑ No Preventive Maintenance Program ® Yes ❑ No Flushing Program ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A Records ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A Isolation Valve Exercise M Yes ❑ No ❑ MA Records [K Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A Comments CROSS CONNECTION CONTROL # BFPAs 107 comm. /2,893 res. # Tested WWTP RPZ Yes Date Tested Unknown Written Plan Yes Date 2007 Comments All commercial backflows are tested annually. --•45 residential backflows are tested monthly. PWS ID # 3590879 -01 Date 8111 /16 GROUND WATER SOURCE Well Number (Florida Unique Well ID #) 3 (AAC3128) 6 (AAC3129) Year Drilled 1972 1997 Depth Drilled 491' 400' Drilling Method Cable tool Cable tool Type of Grout Neat cement Neat cement Static Water Level i' 13' Pumping Water Level 12' 23' Design Well Yield 1,100 1,200 Test Yield Unknown Unknown Actual Yield (if different than rated capacity i 1,600 1,200 Strainer Open hole Open hole Length (outside casing) 123' 89' Diameter (outside casing) 12" 24" Material (outside casing) Black steel Black steel Well Contamination History None None Is inundation of well possible? No No 6' X 6' X 4" Concrete Pad Yes Yes Septic Tank >100, >100, SET Reuse Water >100, >100' BACKS WW Plumbing >100, >100, Other Sanitary Hazard None observed None observed Type Vertical turbine Vertical turbine Manufacturer Name Vertiline Goulds PUMP Model Number 28C9015G DWT Rated Capacity (gpm) 1,100 1,200 Motor Horsepower 20 30 Well casing 12" above grade? Yes Yes Well Casing Sanitary Seal OK OK Raw Water Sampling Tap Yes Yes - Above Ground Check Valve Yes Yes Security Yes Yes Well Vent Protection Yes Yes COMMENTS CHLORINATION (Disinfection) Type: ❑ Gas ® Hypo Comments Make (2) Grundfos Capacity 2x8.5 gpd Chlorine Feed Rate 56% Auto -s 'tchover Avg. Amount of C12 gas used N/A Chlorine Residuals: Plant 1.97 Remote 0.20 Remote tap location 866 Sheoah Circle DPD Test Kit: ® On -site ® With operator ❑ None ❑ Not Used Daily Injection Points Raw line prior to aerator. Booster Pump Info N/A ❑ Comments Adequate Air -pak Chlorine Gas Use Requirements YES NO Comments Du ystem ❑ ❑ Concrete Auto -s 'tchover ❑ ❑ By -Pass Piping Alarms: Loss of Cl? \cability Loss of Cl Cl2 leak d ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes Scale ❑ ❑ PRV /ARV Chained Cylinders ❑ ❑ N/A Reserve Supply ❑ Access Secured Adequate Air -pak ❑ Yes Sign of Leaks ❑ Date of Inspection Fresh Ammonia ❑ 1/26/16 Ventilation ❑ ❑ Room Lighting ❑ ❑ Warning Signs ❑ ❑ Repair Kits ❑ ❑ Fitted Wrench ❑ ❑ Housing/Protection ❑ ❑ AERATION (Gases, Fe, & Mn Removal) Type Cascade tray Capacity 3,800 gpm. Aerator Condition Good Visible Algae Growth None Protective Screen Condition Good Frequency of Cleaning As needed Date Last Inspected/Cleaned Monthly /as needed Comments 3 PWS ID # 3590879-01 Date 8/11 /16 STORAGE FACILITIES (G) Ground (C) Clearwell (E) Elevated (B) Bladder (H ) H dro neumatic / flow- through Tank Type/Number G Capacity (gal) 500,000 Material Concrete Gravity Drain Yes By -Pass Piping Yes Protected Openings Yes Sight Glass or Level Indicator Yes PRV /ARV N/A Pressure Gauge N/A On /Off Pressure 14'/ 17' Access Secured Yes Access Manhole Yes Tank Sample Tap Location Discharge piping Date of Inspection 1/26/16 Date of Cleaning 1/26/16 Comments Pressure maintained throughout treatment via variable frequency drives (VFDs). HIGH SERVICE PUMPS Pump Number 1 2 3 Type Centrifugal Make Worthington Model 4LR14 GLR13 8LR14 Capacity (gpm) 1,200 900 2,500 Motor HP 50 75 150 Date Installed 1974 1986 1974 Comments IRON SEQUESTRATION Chemical Used: A_ qua Fresh 160 Injection Point: Raw line prior to aerator Comments Injected by a 0.4 gph (2) LMI pumps set at 35 % -42 %% State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection Central District SANITARY SURVEY REPORT Plant Name CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS - BAHAMA County Seminole PWS ID # 3590879 -02 Plant Location 110 W. Bahama Road, Winter Springs, FL 32708 Phone 407/327 -2669 Owner Name City of Winter Springs Phone 407/327 -2669 Owner Address ,110 North Flamingo Avenue, Winter Springs, FL 32708 ❑ No ❑ N/A Emergency Response Plan Contact Person Kipton Lockcuff Title Utilities Director Phone 407/327 -2669 This Survey Date 08/11/16 Last Survey Date 12/04/13 Last Compliance Inspection Date 10/30/08 PWS TYPE: Community PLANT CATEGORY & CLASS: 5C MAX -DAY DESIGN CAPACITY: 2.7 MGD PWS STATUS: Approved TREATMENT PROCESSES IN USE Hypocblorination, aeration iron se uestration SERVICE AREA CHARACTERISTICS Municipality Food Service: ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A Number of Service Connections 12,089 Population Served 35,996 Basis Census OPERATION & MAINTENANCE LOG: Yes Location Plant Continents CERTIFIED OPERATOR: Yes Operator(s) & Certification Class- Number: Wa lon Locklear A -18386 Stephanie Monica C -21653 Hrs /day: Required Visit* Actual Visit* Days /wk: Required 5+1 Actual 7 Non - consecutive Days? [—]Yes ❑ No M N/A Comments *Visits must add up to a cumulative total of at least 0.6 hr /week. MONTHLY OPERATION REPORTS (MORs) MORs submitted regularly? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA Data missing from MORs? ® No ❑ Yes ❑ NIA Average Day (from MORs) 1.150 MGD Maximum Day (from MORs) 2,415,000 gpd 01/16 Continents Flow Measuring Device Flow Meter Meter Size & Type 12" GE Panametrics Date Last Calibrated 12/29/11 RAW WATER SOURCE ® GROUND; Number of Wells_ ❑ PURCHASED from PWS ID # ❑ Emergency Water Source Emergency Water Capacity STANDBY POWER SOURCE: Yes Source Cummins diesel aencrator Capacity of Standby (kW) 380 Switchover: ® Automatic [I Manual Hrs Operated Under Load 4 hrs /mo. What equipment does it operate? ® Well Pumps All ® High Service Pumps All ® Treatment Equipment All Satisfy avg. daily demand? ZYes ❑No ❑Unknown Audio- visual alarm? NYes ❑No Comments PLANS AND MAPS Coliform Sampling Plan ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A D /DBP Monitoring Plan ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A Lead and Copper Plan ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A Distribution System Map El Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A Emergency Response Plan ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A Comments PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE /O &M Operation & Maintenance Manual ® Yes ❑ No Preventive Maintenance Program ® Yes [:]No Flushing Program ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A Records ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A Isolation Valve Exercise ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A Records ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A Comments CROSS CONNECTION CONTROL # BFPAs 107 comm. /2,893 res. # Tested WWTP RPZ Yes Date Tested Unknown Written Plan Yes Date 2007 Comments All commercial backflows are tested annually, —45 residential backflows are tested monthly. PWS ID # 3590879 -02 Date 8/11/16 GROUND WATER SOURCE Well Number (Florida Unique Well ID #) 4 (AAC3130) 5 (AAC3131) Year Drilled 1972 1987 Depth Drilled 423' 440' Drilling Method Cable tool Cable tool Type of Grout Neat cement Neat cement Static Water Level 4' 9' Pumping Water Level 7' 11' Design Well Yield 1,100 2,500 Test Yield Unknown Unknown Actual Yield (if different than rated capacity) 1,600 21500 Strainer Open hole Open hole Length (outside casing) 97' 200' Diameter (_outside casing) 12" 20" Material (outside casing) Black steel Black steel Well Contamination History None None 1s inundation of well possible? No No 6' X 6' X 4" Concrete Pad Yes Cracked SET BACKS Septic Tank >100' >100, Reuse Water >100' >100' WW Plumbing >100' >100' Other Sanitary Hazard Raod ---30' None observed PUMP Type Vertical turbine Vertical turbine Manufacturer Name Vertiiine Layne Model Number 28C9015G SRA108059 Rated Capacity (gpm) 1,100 2,400 Motor Horsepower 20 50 Well casing 12" above grade? Yes Yes Well Casing Sanitary Seal OK OK Raw Water Sampling Tap Yes Yes Above Ground Check Valve Yes Yes Security Yes Yes Well Vent Protection Yes Yes COMMENTS CHLORINATION (Disinfection) Type: ❑ Gas ® Hypo Make (2) Grundfos Capacity 2x8.5 gpd Chlorine Feed Rate 84% & 47% Avg. Amount of C12 gas used N/A Chlorine Residuals: Plant >2.2 Remote 1.47 Remote tap location 129 Alderwood DPD Test Kit: Z On -site ® With operator ❑ None ❑ Not Used Daily Injection. Points Raw line prior to aerator. Booster Pump Info N/A Comments Chlorine Gas Use Re ulrements YES NO Comments Dua ystem ❑ ❑ Concrete Auto -s 'tchover ❑ ❑ By -Pass Piping Alarms: Loss of C1\resi ty Loss of C1 C12 leak d ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes Scale ❑ ❑ PRV /ARV Chained Cylinders ❑ ❑ N/A Reserve Supply ❑ Access Secured Adequate Air -pak ❑ Yes Sign of Leaks ❑ ❑ Date of Inspection Fresh Ammonia ❑ 1/26/16 Ventilation ❑ ❑ Room Lighting ❑ ❑ Warning Signs ❑ ❑ Repair Kits ❑ ❑ Fitted Wrench ❑ ❑ Housing Protection ❑ ❑ AERATION (Gases, Fe, & Mn Removal) Type Cascade tray Capacity 3,800 fpm Aerator Condition Good Visible Algae Growth None Protective Screen Condition Good Frequency of Cleaning As needed Date Last Inspected /Cleaned Monthly /as needed Comments C PWS ID 4 3590879 -02 Date 8/11/16 STORAGE FACILITIES (G) Ground (C) Clearwell (E) Elevated (B ) Bladder H Hy dro neumatic / flow - through Tank Type /Number G Capacity (gal) 500,000 Material Concrete Gravity Drain Yes By -Pass Piping Yes Protected Openings Yes Sight Glass or Level Indicator Yes PRV /ARV N/A Pressure Gauge N/A On /Off Pressure 14'/17' Access Secured Yes Access Manhole Yes Tank Sample Tap Location Discharge piping Date of Inspection 1/26/16 Date of Cleaning 1/26/16 Comments HIGH SERVICE PUMPS Pump Number 1 2 3 Type Centrifugal Make Worthington Ingersoll Model 6LR13 6LR13 6LR13 Capacity (gpm) 950 950 2,500 Motor HP 75 75 100 Date Installed 1974 1986 1974 Comments IRON SEQUESTRATION Chemical Used: Aqua Fresh 160 Injection Point: Raw line prior to aerator Comments Injected by a 0.4 gph LMI pump set at 14% and a 0.6 gph Iwaki set at 62% State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection Central District SANITARY SURVEY REPORT Plant Name CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS - TUSKAWILLA County Seminole PWS ID # 3590879 -03 Plant Location 851 Northern Way, Winter Springs, FL 32708 Phone 407/327 -2669 Owner Name City of Winter Springs Phone 407/327 -2669 Owner Address 110 North Flamingo Avenue, Winter Springs, FL 32708 ❑ No ❑ N/A Emergency Response Plan Contact Person Kipton Lockcuff Title Utilites Director Phone 4071327 -2669 This Survey Date 08 /11 /16 Last Survey Date 12;04/03 Last. Compliance Inspection Date 10/30/08 PWS TYPE: Cormnunity PLANT CATEGORY & CLASS: 5C MAX -DAY DESIGN CAPACITY: 2.736 MGD PWS STATUS: Approved TREATMENT PROCESSES IN USE Gas chlorination aeration corrosion inhibitor SERVICE AREA CHARACTERISTICS Municipality _ Food Service: ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A Number of Service Connections 9,833 Population Served 29,273 Basis Census OPERATION & MAINTENANCE LOG: Yes Location Plant Comments CERTIFIED OPERATOR: Yes Operator(s) & Certification Class - Number: Waylon Locklear A -18386 Stephanie Monica C -21653 Hrs /day; Required *Visit Aerial *Visit Days /wk: Required 5+1 Actual 7 Non - consecutive Days? ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 N/A Comments *Visits must add up to a cumulative total of at least 0.6 hr /week. MONTHLY OPERATION REPORTS (MORs) MORs submitted regularly? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A Data missing from MORs? ® No ❑ Yes ❑ N/A Average Day (from MORs) 1.697 MGD Maxirnuin Day (from MORs) 4,221,000 gpd 5116 Comments Flow Measuring Device Flow Meter Meter Size & Type 12" MagMeter Date Last Calibrated 12/09/15 RAW WATER SOURCE Z GROUND; Number of Wells_ ❑ PURCHASED from PWS ID # ❑ Emergency Water Source Emergency Water Capacity STANDBY POWER SOURCE: Yes Source CatemilIar diesel venerator Capacity of Standby (kW) 565 Switchover: Z Automatic ❑ Manual Hrs Operated Under Load 4 hrs /wk. What equipment does it operate? ® Well Pumps 1 and 3 ® High Service Pumps All ® Treatment Equipment All Satisfy avg. daily demand? ®Yes ❑No ❑Unknown Audio - visual alarm? Eyes ❑No Comments PLANS AND MAPS Coliform Sampling Plan ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A D /DBP Monitoring Plan ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A Lead and Copper Plan ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A Distribution System Map ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A Emergency Response Plan ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A Comments PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE /O &M Operation & Maintenance Manual Z Yes ❑ No Preventive Maintenance Program ® Yes ❑ No Flushing Program ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA Records Z Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA Isolation Valve Exercise ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A Records Z Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA Comments CROSS CONNECTION CONTROL # BFPAs 107 comm. /2,893 res. # Tested WWTP RPZ Yes Date Tested Unknown Written Plan Yes Date 2007 Comments All commercial backflows are tested annually. —45 residential backflows are tested monthly. PWS 1D # 3590879 -03 Date 8111/16 GROUND WATER SOURCE Well Number (Florida Unique Well ID #) 1 (AAC3125) 2 (AAC3126) 3 (AAC3127) 4 (AAC0528) Year Drilled 1972 1978 1989 2005 Depth Drilled 290' 290' 290' 350' Drilling Method Cable tool Cable tool Cable tool Combination Type of Grout Neat cement Neat cement Neat cement Neat cement Static Water Level 16' 15' 15' 15' Pumping Water Level 14' 18' 14' 18' Design Well Yield 1,200 2,000 2,000 1,200 Test Yield 1,200 2,000 2,260 1,486 Actual Yield (if different than rated capacity) 1,200 2,000 2,000 1,200 Strainer Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Length (outside casing) 117' 119' 190' 130' Diameter (outside casing) 8" 12" 12" 16" Material (outside casing) Black steel Black steel Black steel Black steel Well Contamination History None None None None Is inundation of well possible? No No No No 6' X 6' X 4" Concrete Pad Yes Yes Cracked Yes Septic Tank >100' >100' >100, >100, SET BACKS Reuse Water >100, —20' reuse line >100' >100' WW Plumbing >100' >100' >100, >100' Other Sanitary Hazard None observed None observed None observed Road —30' Type Vertical turbine Vertical turbine Vertical turbine Vertical turbine Manufacturer Name Goulds Goulds Goulds Goulds PUMP Model Number 63365 -6 Unknown 12DHHO -2 12RJHC Rated Capacity (gpm) 1,200 2,000 2,000 1,200 Motor Horsepower 30 50 50 25 Well casing 12" above grade? Yes Yes Yes Yes Well Casing Sanitary Seal OK OK OK OK Raw Water Sampling Tap Yes Yes Yes Yes Above Ground Check Valve Yes Yes Yes Yes Security Yes Yes Yes Yes Well Vent Protection Yes Yes Yes Yes COMMENTS Well #2 has corrosion, being replaced within the year CHLORINATION (Disinfection) Type: ® Gas ❑ Hypo Make Baidor Dosuero Capacity 200 ppd Chlorine Feed Rate 150 -450 ppd Avg. Amount of C12 gas used NIA Chlorine Residuals: Plant N/A Remote 0.21 Remote tap location 1387 Ayerswood DPD Test Kit: ® On -site ® With operator ❑ None ❑ Not Used Daily Injection Points well pipe prior to plant Booster Pump Info NIA Comments Changing out pump_ in January Chlorine Gas Use Requirements YES NO Comments Du System ❑ ❑ 0.50 Auto -s itchover ❑ ❑ Concrete Alarms: Loss of Cl2 ability Loss of C12 res ual 02 leak detectio ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes Scale ❑ ❑ Yes Chained Cylinders ❑ ❑ Yes Reserve Supply ❑ Yes Adequate Air -pak N/A N/A Sign of Leaks ❑ ❑ N/A Fresh Ammonia ❑ 14'/17' Ventilation ❑ ❑ Yes Room Lighting ❑ ❑ Yes Warning Signs ❑ ❑ Discharge piping Repair Kits ❑ ❑ 2/12 Fitted Wrench ❑ El 2/12 Housing /Protection ❑ ❑ AERATION (Gases, Fe, & Mn Removal) Type Cascade tray Capacity See comments Aerator Condition Good Visible Algae Growth None Protective Screen Condition Good Frequency of Cleaning As needed Date Last Inspected /Cleaned Monthly /as needed Comments G1 - 3,800 apm, G2 - 3,500 gptn _ 9 PWS ID # 3590879 -03 Date 8/11/16 STORAGE FACILITIES (G) Ground (C) Clearwell (E) Elevated (B) Bladder (H) Hydropneumatic / flow- through Tank Type/Number GI G2 Capacity (gal) 1.0 0.50 Material Concrete Concrete Gravity Drain Yes Yes By -Pass Piping Yes Yes Protected Openings Yes Yes Sight Glass or Level Indicator Yes Yes PRV /ARV N/A N/A Pressure Gauge N/A N/A On /Off Pressure 14'/17' 14'/17' Access Secured Yes Yes Access Manhole Yes Yes Tank Sample Tap Location Discharge i ing Discharge piping Date of Inspection 2112 2/12 Date of Cleaning 2112 2/12 Comments HIGH SERVICE PUMPS Pump Number 1 2 3 Type Centrifugal Make Aurora Model 411 BF 411BF 411BF Capacity (gpm) 2,400 3,350 2,600 Motor HP 150 150 125 Date Installed 1972 2016 1988 Comments Tanks scheduled to be inspected & cleaned 1 /17 IRON SEQUESTRATION Chemical Used: Aqua Fresh 160 Injection Point: Raw line prior to aerator Comments (4) 0.6 gph Iwaki pumps set at 70 %. FDEP Pilot study approved 8/1/16- 10 /31 /16 PWS ID # 3590879 Date 8111116 MONITORING REMINDER: • Nitrate and nitrite samples are required to be collected from the point of entry (POE) to the distribution system annually. The 03/10/16 results have been received by the Department. + Monitoring schedules are available on the Central District's Drinking Water Website. http: / /www.do. state. fl. us / central / Home/ DrinkingWater/ InHouseCompliance /MonitorinaSchedules/Monitorin Sg ched. ulcs.htm COMMENTS: • Contact FRWA (Florida Rural Water Association) at 850- 668 -2746, or frwa@frwa.net, for free technical assistance with your system. FRWA has extended benefits offered to members. • Provide documentation that the finished- drinking -water meter has been calibrated at least every 5 years. Checking the calibration of finished - drinking -water meters at treatment plants shall be performed in accordance with the equipment manufacturer's recommendations or in accordance with a written preventive maintenance program established by the supplier of water. [Rule 62- 555.350(2), F.A.C.]. Suppliers of water shall submit written notification to the Department before beginning work or alterations to the public water system. Each notification shall be submitted to the appropriate Department of Environmental Protection District Office or Approved County Health Department and shall include the following: a description of the scope, purpose, and location of the work or alterations; and assurance that the work or alterations will comply with applicable requirements Iisted in Rule 62- 555.330, F.A.C. Suppliers of water may begin such work or alterations 14 days after providing notification to the Department unless they are advised by the Department that the notification is incomplete or that a construction permit is required. • Suppliers of water shall telephone the SWO at 1 -800- 320 -0519 immediately (i.e., within two hours) after discovery of any actual or suspected sabotage or security breach, or any suspicious incident, involving a public water system. [Rule 62- 555.350(10)(x), F.A.C.] • Suppliers of water shall telephone, and speak directly to a person at, the appropriate DEP District Office as soon as possible, but never later than noon of the next business day, in the event of any of the following emergency or abnormal operating conditions: • The occurrence of any abnormal color, odor, or taste in a public water system's raw or finished water; • The failure of a public water system to comply with applicable disinfection requirements; or o T he breakdown of any water treatment or pumping facilities, or the break of any water main, in a public water system if the breakdown or break is expected to adversely affect finished -water quality, interrupt water service to 150 or more service connections or 350 or more people, interrupt water service to any one service connection for more than eight hours, or necessitate the issuance of a precautionary "boil water" notice in accordance with the Department of Health's "Guidelines for the Issuance of Precautionary Boil Water Notices" as adopted in Rule 62- 555.335, F.A.C. [Rule 62- 555.350(10)(b), F.A.C.] Suppliers of water shall notify affected water customers in writing or via telephone, newspaper, radio, or television; and telephone, and speak directly to a person at, the appropriate DEP District Office by no later than the previous business day before taking PWS components out of operation for planned maintenance or repair work if the work is expected to adversely affect finished -water quality, interrupt water service to 150 or more service connections or 350 or more people, interrupt water service to any one service connection for more than eight hours, or necessitate the issuance of a precautionary "boil water" notice in accordance with the Department of Health's "Guidelines for the Issuance of Precautionary Boil Water Notices" as adopted in Rule 62- 555335, F.A.C. [Rule 62- 555.350(10)(d), F.A.C.] 10` PWS ID # 3590879 Date 8/11/16 • Suppliers of water shall issue precautionary "boil water" notices as required or recommended in the Department of Health's "Guidelines for the Issuance of Precautionary Boil Water Notices" as adopted in Rule 62- 555.335, F.A.C. [Rule 62- 555.350(11), F.A.C.] Inspector Supervisor. Title Env. Specialist III Date 11/8/16 Title Environmental Manaizer Date 11/8/16 11