Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016 01 11 Public Hearing 401 Northern Oaks FLUM RZCOMMISSION AGENDA ITEM 401 REQUEST: Informational Consent Public Hearings X Regular January 11, 2016 KS RS Regular Meeting City Manager Department The Community Development Department — Planning Division requests that the City Commission hold a Public Hearing to consider Second Reading and Adoption for both the Large -Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment and Rezoning for approximately 20.48 acres, generally located just east of the intersection of State Road 434 and State Road 417 as described within Ordinances 2015 -02 and 2015 -03. In addition, staff recommends placing the subject property within Traffic Concurrency Exemption Area (TCEA) Zone C and simultaneously updating the existing City of Winter Springs TCEA Zone Map to reflect said change. SYNOPSIS: The City of Winter Springs Community Development Department received an application for a Large -Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment, Expedited State Review (15 -1), and Rezoning for approximately 20.48 acres, generally located just east of the intersection of State Road 434 and State Road 417 (See Attachment A - Location Map). Ordinance 2015- 02 proposes to change the Future Land Use designation for two (2) parcels totaling approximately 20.48 gross acres of property currently within Seminole County, Florida from "Suburban Estate" to the City of Winter Springs "Low Density Residential" (see Attachment B - Ordinance 2015 -02). Ordinance 2015 -03 proposes to rezone the property from Seminole County "Agriculture (A -1)" to City of Winter Springs "One Family Dwelling District (R -1)" (see Attachment C - Ordinance 2015 -03). In addition, staff recommends placing the subject property within TCEA Zone C and simultaneously updating the existing City of Winter Springs TCEA Zone Map to reflect said change (see Attachment D - TCEA Map). The requested Large -Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment and Rezoning are a companion to the Annexation request via Ordinance 2015- 01 that was previously covered under Item 400. At the December 14, 2015 City Public Hearings 401 PAGE 1 OF 12 - January 11, 2016 Commission meeting this item was postponed to the date certain of the January 11, 2016 meeting to allow the City Attorney and Staff to evaluate the issues raised during the meeting by the adjacent property owner (Hendrix). CONSIDERATIONS: Applicant Name and Address: Madichristo Land Holdings, LLC 1520 Whitstable Court Lake Mary, FL 32746 Property Owner: Janet Mann Trustee FBO 1751 Firehouse Lane Apt. 102 Orlando, F132814 -6441 04- 21 -31- 300 - 0090 -0000 William Wilson 3128 Penwa Court Longwood, FL 32779 -3109 04- 21 -31- 300 -009A -0000 Property Address: None Property Parcel ID'S: 04- 21 -31- 300 - 0090 -0000 04- 21 -31- 300 -009A -0000 Property Acreage: Approximately 20.48 acres Property Legal Description: See 'Attachment E - Legal Description' Future Land Use Designation: Seminole County: "Suburban Estate" (see Attachment F - Future Land Use Map) Proposed Future Land Use Designation: City of Winter Springs: "Low Density Residential" Zoning Designation: Seminole County: Agriculture "A -1" (see Attachment G - Zoning Map) Proposed Zoning Designation: City of Winter Springs: "R -1" Approved Development Permits: None Pending Code Enforcement Actions: None City Liens: None APPLICABLE LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY Florida Statutes 163.2511- 163.3246 : (Provides that land development regulations for municipal planning be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan). Florida Statute 166.041 Procedures for adoption of ordinances and resolutions. Public Hearings 401 PAGE 2 OF 12 - January 11, 2016 Winter Springs Charter Article IV. Governing Body. Section 4.06. General powers and duties. Section 4.15. Ordinances in General. City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan. Winter Springs Code of Ordinances, Chapter 20, Zoning, Article III Establishment of Districts, Division 4. Winter Springs Code of Ordinances, Chapter 20, Zoning, Article II, Section 20 -31. Existing Land Uses — The subject parcels, currently within Seminole County, are located just east of the intersection of State Road 434 and State Road 417. The applicant desires to combine the two (2) county parcels for a future single - family development. The surrounding area is primarily a mixed use (residential and commercial) corridor serving as an entry point to the City of Winter Springs. The subject properties are currently vacant, owned by Janet Mann and William Wilson and abut State Road 434, which is a mixed use node. This is an area that is conducive to future commercial, office, and residential development. The subject properties are currently designated "Suburban Estate" on the Seminole County Future Land Use Map and Agriculture "A -1" on the Seminole County Zoning Map. The surrounding area is generally characterized by the following land use and zoning categories. Proposed Future Land Use Classification — The proposed Large -Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment proposes to change the Future Land Use Map designation from the Seminole County "Suburban Estate" designation to the City of Winter Springs "Low Public Hearings 401 PAGE 3 OF 12 - January 11, 2016 Existing Land Uses Zoning Future Land Use Subject Vacant Property Seminole County: Seminole County: Properties Agriculture "A -1 " Suburban Estate (SE) North Vacant City of Winter Springs: City of Winter No Zoning Springs: Conservation South Vacant Property, Single- City of Oviedo City of Oviedo Family Residential W -1 & C -1 Low Density Residential & Commercial East Vacant Property City of Winter City of Winter Springs: Neighborhood Springs: Commercial "C -1" Commercial West Single- Family City of Winter Springs: City of Winter Residence; Antique Greeneway Interchange Springs: Shop; Vacant Property District "GID" Greeneway Interchange Seminole County: District; Agriculture "A -1" Seminole County: Commercial Proposed Future Land Use Classification — The proposed Large -Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment proposes to change the Future Land Use Map designation from the Seminole County "Suburban Estate" designation to the City of Winter Springs "Low Public Hearings 401 PAGE 3 OF 12 - January 11, 2016 Density Residential" designation. The requested "Low Density Residential" future land use designation has a maximum density /intensity limitation of 3.5 dwelling units per gross acre. The applicant desires to combine the two (2) county parcels with for future development. The proposed Conceptual Plan yields 36 lots (see 'Attachment H - Conceptual Plan'). REZONING ANALYSIS The following summarizes the data and issues which Staff analyzed in reviewing this application as required by the Code of Ordinances, Section 20 -31: (1) Compliance with Procedural Requirements- The proposed rezoning is in compliance with all procedural requirements established by the City Code and law. Requirements for advertising the land use action have been met. (2) Consistent with the Comprehensive Plan- The proposed rezoning change is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the proposed change will not have an adverse effect on the Comprehensive Plan. (3) Consistent with any Master Plan for the property- The subject property is currently vacant and proposed for future residential development. (4) Not Contrary to the Land Use Pattern Established by the Comprehensive Plan- The proposed rezoning from Seminole County "Agriculture (A -1)" to Winter Springs "R -l" is appropriate and compatible with the land use pattern established by the City's Comprehensive Plan. (5) Does Not Create Spot Zoning- The proposed rezoning does not create a spot zone, which is prohibited by law. The proposed zoning designation is compatible with the surrounding area. (6) Does Not Materially Alter the Population Density Pattern- The proposed rezoning does not alter the existing developed population density pattern and therefore will not overtax the load on public facilities and services (utilities, streets, and other municipal services and infrastructure). (7) Does Not Create Illogically Drawn Zoning District Boundaries- The proposed rezoning does not result in existing zoning district boundaries that are illogically drawn in relation to the existing conditions on the property and the surrounding area and the land use pattern established by the City's Comprehensive Plan. (8) Changed Conditions Make the Proposed Rezoning Necessary- The proposed zoning designation of "R -1" is compatible with the proposed "Low Density" Future Land Use Map classification that is proposed via Ordinance 2015 -02. (9) No Serious Reduction in Light or Air to Adjacent Areas- The proposed rezoning will not seriously reduce light or air to adjacent areas. (10) Adverse Impact on Surrounding Property Values- The proposed zoning designation has been determined by evaluating the prevailing character of the area around the subject property. (11) Not Detrimental to Future Improvement of Adjacent Vacant Property- The intent in the zoning of the property is to apply a zoning classification for the subject property that is consistent and compatible with the surrounding land uses. (12) Does Not Constitute a Special Privilege- The proposed rezoning does not constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. (13) Not out of Scale- The proposed rezoning change is not out of scale or incompatible with the needs of the neighborhood or the City. (14) Does Not Violate any City Land Use Regulations- The proposed rezoning does not violate any applicable land use regulations adopted by the City. Letters/Phone Calls In Favor Or Opposition — To date, the City has not received any letters Public Hearings 401 PAGE 4 OF 12 - January 11, 2016 or phone calls in favor or opposition. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT ANALYSIS: The following summarizes the data and issues which staff analyzed in reviewing this application: Justification for Future Land Use Designation - The requested Large -Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment proposes to change the Future Land Use Map designation from "Suburban Estate" to "Low Density" for approximately 20.48 gross acres, more or less, currently within Seminole County, Florida, and generally located just east of the intersection of State Road 434 and State Road 417. The proposed use and density is compatible with the surrounding area which is primarily a mixed use (residential and commercial) corridor serving as an entry point to the City of Winter Springs and thereby deemed as an area that is conducive to future commercial, office, and residential development. PUBLIC FACILITIES: ROAD S /TRAFFIC CIRCULATION: The portion of State Road 434 that abuts the subject property contains two (2) lanes, having one east bound and one westbound lane as you travel east on State Road 434. Development of the property will require coordination with FDOT, the permitting agency for driveway connections to State Road 434. The segment of State Road 434 from State Road 417 to Hammock Lane is near or perhaps over capacity, and this could impact the ability to develop these properties at the desired use and /or density. State Road 434 is tentatively programmed by Seminole County to be widened from two to four lanes within the next ten years; however, this project has not even started the study phase at this time. Availability ofAccess: Future residential development will have direct access to State Road 434. The Preliminary Subdivision Plan identifies two (2) points of direct access to State Road 434. Function Classification: State Road 434 is a principal arterial that runs north from Edgewater Drive near Orlando to Altamonte Springs, then east to Oviedo, and then south to East Colonial Drive. Within this portion of the City of Winter Springs, State Road 434 is a two -lane arterial roadway. According to the City's Comprehensive Plan, the level of service (LOS) on this portion of State Road 434 is an "F ". POTABLE WATER: The City has water and sewer services available to serve the subject property. The water service consists of an existing 12 -inch water main along the north side of State Road 434. WASTEWATER The City has an existing 6 -inch force main along the south side of State Road 434. RECLAIMED WATER: Facilities serving the subject property: None currently. ELECTRIC SERVICE: Facilities serving the subject property: None currently. The City of Winter Springs is Public Hearings 401 PAGE 5 OF 12 - January 11, 2016 serviced by Duke Energy for electric service. A future land use change will not impact current electric rates. SOLID WASTE: Facilities serving the subject property: None currently. The City of Winter Springs currently has a franchise agreement and is serviced by Waste Pro of Florida, Inc., a private solid waste contractor who will provide service to this area. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT: Facilities serving the parcels: None currently. Upon development, the site will be required to provide on -site stormwater management in accordance with all applicable St. John's River Water Management District (SJRWMD) criteria. POLICE: The City of Winter Springs is responsible for police protection. The station closest in proximity to the subject property is located at 300 N. Moss Road. Response times are averaged monthly. FIRE: Seminole County is responsible for fire protection. City of Oviedo Fire Station 44, located at 42 Central Avenue South, Oviedo, Florida is the closest fire station. The response time is approximately two minutes. NUISANCE POTENTIAL OF PROPOSED USE TO SURROUNDING LAND USES: The change in designation from Seminole County "Suburban Estate" to City of Winter Springs "Low Density Residential" will not result in any nuisance potential for the surrounding properties because proposed uses are compatible with the "Low Density Residential" future land use designation, and the subject properties are surrounded primarily by commercial, and residential uses. NATURAL RESOURCES COMPATIBILITY: There are no conservation overlays on the subject property (see Attachment I - Wetland Flag Exhibit & Attachment J - Topo Map). SOILS According to the Soil Survey of Seminole County, Florida, prepared by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS), four (4) soil types occur within the subject property boundaries (see Attachment K - Soils Map). These soils include the following: Basinger, Samsula and Hontoon soils, depressional ( #10) Basinger and Smyrna fine sands, depressional ( #11) Myakka and EauGallie fine sands ( #20) Pomello fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes ( #27) The following presents a brief description of each of the soil types mapped for the subject property: Basinger, Samsula and Hontoon soils, depressional ( #10) are nearly level, very poorly drained soils found in swamps and depressions. Typically the surface layer of Basinger soil consists of very dark gray mucky fine sand about 6 inches thick. The surface layer of Samsula soil typically consists of muck about 30 inches thick. Typically the surface layer of Public Hearings 401 PAGE 6 OF 12 - January 11, 2016 Hontoon soil consists of dark reddish brown muck about 18 inches thick. During most years, the undrained areas of the soils in this map unit are ponded for 6 to 9 months or more. The permeability of this soil unit is rapid. Basinger and Smyrna fine sands, depressional ( #11) are nearly level, very poorly drained soils found in depressions. Typically the surface layer of Basinger soil consists of black mucky fine sand about 5 inches thick. Typically the surface layer of Smyrna soil consists of black fine sand about 2 inches thick. During most years undrained areas of this soil unit are ponded for 6 to 9 months. The permeability of Basinger soil is rapid. The permeability of Smyrna soil is rapid in the surface and subsurface, moderate or moderately rapid in the subsoil, and rapid in the substratum. Myakka and EauGallie fine sands ( #20) are nearly level, poorly drained soils found on broad plains on the flatwoods. Typically the surface layer of Myakka soil consists of black fine sand about 5 inches thick. The surface layer of EauGallie soil typically consists of dark gray fine sand about 5 inches thick. During most years the seasonal high table for this soil type is within 12 inches of the surface for 1 to 4 months. The permeability of Myakka soil is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers and in the substratum and moderate or moderately rapid in the subsoil. The permeability of EauGallie soil is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers, moderate or moderately rapid in the sandy part of the subsoil and moderately slow in the loamy part of the subsoil. Pomello fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes ( #27) is a nearly level to gently sloping, moderately well drained soils found on low ridges and knolls on the flatwoods. Typically the surface layer of this soil type is light gray fine sand about 2 inches thick. In most years, the seasonal high water table for this soil type is at a depth of 36 to 60 inches for 1 to 4 months. The permeability of this soil type is very rapid in the surface and subsurface layers, moderately rapid in the subsoil, and rapid in the substratum. The Florida Association of Environmental Soil Scientists ( FAESS) considers the Basinger, Samsula and Hontoon soils, depressional ( #10) and Basinger and Smyrna fine sands, depressional ( #11) soil types associated with the property to be a hydric soil. Furthermore, the FAESS considers inclusions present in the Myakka and EauGallie fine sands ( #20) soil type associated with the property to be hydric. This information can be found in the Hydric Soils of Florida Handbook, Third Edition, March 2000. FLOOD PRONE AREAS According to the Seminole County Property Appraiser's records, the property is within both flood zone "X" and "AE ". Flood hazard areas identified on the Flood Insurance Rate Map are identified as a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA). SFHA are defined as the area that will be inundated by the flood event having a 1- percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. The 1- percent annual chance flood is also referred to as the base flood or 100 -year flood. SFHAs are labeled as Zone "AE ". The areas of minimal flood hazard, which are the areas outside the SFHA and higher than the elevation of the 0.2- percent- annual- chance flood, are labeled Zone "X" (see Attachment L - Flood Map). HISTORIC RESOURCES No known historical resources are known to be located on the subject property. WILDLIFE PROTECTED SPECIES Using methodologies outlined in the Florida's Fragile Wildlife (Wood, 2001); Measuring Public Hearings 401 PAGE 7 OF 12 - January 11, 2016 and Monitoring Biological Diversity Standard Methods for Mammals (Wilson, et al., 1996); Wildlife Methodology Guidelines (1988); and Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FFWCC's) Gopher Tortoise Permitting Guidelines (revised April 2013); an assessment for "listed" floral and faunal species was conducted at the site on November 3, 2014 (see Attachment M - Environmental Assessment Report) . This assessment included both direct observations and indirect evidence, such as tracks, burrows, tree markings and vocalizations that indicated the presence of species observed. The assessment focused on species that are "listed" by the FFWCC's Official Lists - Florida's Endangered Species, Threatened Species and Species of Special Concern (January 2013) that have the potential to occur in Seminole County (see attached Table 1). Two (2) plant species were identified that are listed as "commercially exploited" by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS). The harvesting of these species, cinnamon fern (Osmunda cinnamomea) and royal fern (Osmunda regalis), for commercial gain, is not permitted. The listing of these species poses no restrictions towards the development of the subject property. The following is a list of those wildlife species identified during the evaluation of the site: Reptiles and Amphibians brown anole (Norops sagrei) eastern black racer (Coluber constrictor) Florida leopard frog (Lithobates sphenocephalus sphenocephalus) green anole (Anolis carolinensis) green tree frog (Hyla cinerea) Birds American Crow (Corvus caurinus) Black Vulture (Coragyps atratus) Mourning Dove (Zenaida macroura) Northern Cardinal ( Cardinalis cardinalis) Northern Mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos) Osprey (Pandion haliaetus) Mammals eastern gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) common raccoon (Procyon lotor) marsh rabbit (Sylvilagus palustris) nine - banded armadillo (Dasypus novemcinctus) white- tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) Virginia possum (Didelphis virginiana) CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Future Land Use Element The Preliminary Subdivision Plan that was presented by the applicant contains 51 residential units on 20.48 acres yielding a density of 2.73 dwelling units per acre. Per the Comprehensive Plan, the Low Density Residential future land use category has a maximum density threshold of (3.5) dwelling units per gross acre. To help evaluate the anticipated impact of said development, the applicant has agreed to enter into a Developer's Agreement hereby reducing both the side and rear yard setbacks etc. The surrounding area is generally characterized The proposed future land use amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed future land use amendment is consistent with the following Goals, Objectives and Policies from the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan: Public Hearings 401 PAGE 8 OF 12 - January 11, 2016 GOAL 1: Quality of Life. To ensure that the character, magnitude, and location of all land uses provides a system for orderly growth and development (as defined in sections 163.3221 and 380.04, Florida Statutes) that achieves a balanced, natural, energy efficient, and economic environment, and enhances the quality of life of all residents throughout and beyond the 2030 planning horizon. The subject site as it currently exists is an enclave surrounded by the City of Winter Springs. This enclave is adjacent to the City both to the west and the east and will be developed consistently with the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. Policy 1.2.2: Potable Water. Do not issue development orders unless it can be determined that adequate potable water supplies and facilities are available. (Cross Reference: See Infrastructure Element, Policy 2.3.3) Water is available to serve the project. Policy 1.2.4: Sewer. Require residential and commercial development and redevelopment, to connect to or extend the central sewer system to provide service to their development, except for single family residential that includes only one or two lots. (Cross Reference: See Infrastructure Element, Policy 1.4. 1) Sewer is available to serve the project. Policy 1.4.5: S.R. 434 Overlay. Implement the S.R. 434 overlay corridor design standards to encourage infill development that is appropriate for the character of the neighborhoods adjacent to this corridor. Allow a vertical mix of uses to promote a live -work environment. The applicant seeks to expand the boundaries of the City in preparation for a single - family development. Policy 1.61: Cross Access Easements. Require shared driveways and cross access easements between adjacent properties where feasible to support efficiency in travel and to reduce demand on arterial and collector streets. Development projects over ten (10) acres shall have more than one point of access unless determined infeasible. (Cross Reference: See Multimodal Transportation Element, Policy 1.2.2) (Ord. 2010 -18; 10- 25 -10) The proposed Preliminary Subdivision Plan identifies two (2) points of entry on State Road 434. Policy 1.8.2: Enclaves. Annex all enclaves, where feasible, in order to reduce land use conflicts and provide efficient public service. The subject site as it currently exists is an enclave surrounded by the City of Winter Springs. Policy 1.8.3: Condition for Connection to City Utilities. Require new development within the County in areas that are contiguous to the City, to be annexed into the City and to be developed to City standards as a condition for connection to City utilities, unless that development is the subject of a mutually accepted utility agreement. The subject property as it currently exists is an enclave surrounded by Amendment is a companion to a proposed Annexation (Ordinance 2015 -01) and Rezoning (Ordinance 2015 -03) request. Upon annexation adoption, the proposed project will be developed to City standards as a condition for connection to City utilities. Policy 61.4: Procedures for Inclusion of Annexed Properties into the City's TCEA. Place properties that involve a large -scale land use amendment into a City TCEA Zone as part of the large -scale amendment process and amend simultaneously the appropriate TCEA map (s). Place properties that involve a small -scale land use amendment into a City TCEA Zone as part of the next large -scale amendment cycle, and amend simultaneously the appropriate Public Hearings 401 PAGE 9 OF 12 - January 11, 2016 TCEA map(s). During the interim period, after obtaining a City land use category, but prior to placement in a City TCEA Zone, development on property may proceed by the development providing and funding mobility standards and requirements of the most physically proximate Zone. If the property is adjacent to two Zones, the City shall assign the Zone after making a determination as to which is most appropriate. Per Policy 1.11.2, Transportation Element, TCEA Zone C includes properties within V2 mile (2640 feet) of the centerline of State Road 434, extending from the western City boundary to the eastern City boundary, exclusive of those parcels included within Zone A or B and properties within V2 mile (2640 feet) of the centerline of U.S. 17 -92, extending from the northern most City boundary to the southernmost City boundary. Zone C contains both built -up properties, properties suitable for redevelopment and some vacant parcels. Public facilities and services are available, such as sanitary sewer, potable water, roads, and recreation areas. In 2009, a LYNX route began servicing the City and now provides direct access to the University of Central Florida. Ridership has exceeded expectations. This route is at the heart of the City's mobility strategies, as it is the "mobility artery" that pedestrian and bicycle feeders will link into and which will in turn will provide the City with connectivity to SunRail. However, older areas of Zone C have no sidewalks. The provision of sidewalks within a 1/4 mile of the LYNX fixed route has been identified as one of the major components of the City's pedestrian Q/LOS (see Attachment D - TCEA Map). Policy 1.3.1 - requires all development proposals to determine their specific impacts on current Level of Service (LOS) and mobility standards. The applicant has submitted a Traffic Impact Analysis for said development. The report analyzes the traffic related impact for the proposed Preliminary Subdivision Plan consisting of 51 single - family dwelling units. Currently only 36 single family lots are being proposed. Policy 1.3.4 - requires the City to support proposed future land use map amendments with data and analysis demonstrating that adequate water supplies and associated public facilities will be available to meet the projected growth demands. City water and sewer service is available to serve the subject property. Policy 1.64 - Encourages land uses that generate high traffic counts to locate adjacent to arterial roads and mass transit systems. The proposed single - family development has direct access to State Road 434. The portion of State Road 434 that abuts the subject property contains two (2) lanes, having one east bound and one westbound lane as you travel east on State Road 434. State Road 434 is tentatively programmed by Seminole County to be widened from two to four lanes within the next ten years; however, this project has not even started the study phase at this time. Policy 1. 7.1 - requires the City to consider existing and proposed land uses in adjacent jurisdictions when reviewing proposed land use amendments. The proposed use and density is compatible with the surrounding area, as it generally characterized by both low and medium density residential and commercial development patterns. Transportation Element The proposed future land use amendment is consistent with the following policies from the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan: Policy 1.1.7 and Policy 1.11.5 — requires a Transportation Impact Analysis for all new development generating more than 300 total annual average daily trips. The applicant has Public Hearings 401 PAGE 10 OF 12 - January 11, 2016 provided a Traffic Impact Analysis for the proposed development (see Attachment N - Traffic Impact Analysis). Said analysis shall be reviewed in detail as part of the Preliminary Subdivision Plan submittal. FINDINGS: 1. The request is consistent with all applicable goals, objectives and policies of the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan. 2. The request is in conformance with the purpose and intent of the City Code and with all applicable requirements. 3. Considering the type and location of uses involved and the general character of the area, the change of the FLUM designation will not result in any incompatible land uses, including such factors as height, bulk, scale, intensity, traffic, noise, drainage, dust, lighting, appearance, and other factors deemed important. 4. The request is consistent with Florida Statute Chapter 163, Part II, of the Florida Statutes. FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed Large Scale future Plan Amendment will increase the possibility of additional taxable value to the City and potentially spur the increase of future residential, commercial and /or office development activity within this particular area. A detailed Fiscal Impact Report will be performed once specific development plans are made available. COMMUNICATION EFFORTS: This Agenda Item has been electronically forwarded to the Mayor and City Commission, City Manager, City Attorney /Staff, and is available on the City's Website, LaserFiche, and the City's Server. Additionally, portions of this Agenda Item are typed verbatim on the respective Meeting Agenda which has also been electronically forwarded to the individuals noted above, and which is also available on the City's Website, LaserFiche, and the City's Server; has been sent to applicable City Staff, Media/Press Representatives who have requested Agendas /Agenda Item information, Homeowner's Associations/Representatives on file with the City, and all individuals who have requested such information. This information has also been posted outside City Hall, posted inside City Hall with additional copies available for the General Public, and posted at five (5) different locations around the City. Furthermore, this information is also available to any individual requestors. City Staff is always willing to discuss this Agenda Item or any Agenda Item with any interested individuals. Pursuant to Florida Statutes 171.044 (6), the Seminole County Board of County Commissioners was sent via Certified Mail the notice of Annexation, Large -Scale Plan Amendment, and Rezoning for the subject parcels on December 8, 2014 (see Attachment O - Seminole County Board of County Commission Annexation Notification Letter — December 8, 2014). Adjacent property owners have been notified by U.S. mail on December 29, 2014 In addition, the properties have been posted with a large yellow sign. The proposed Ordinances were advised in the Orlando Sentinel on December 18, 2014 for the First Reading and Transmittal and again on December 3, 2015 for Second Reading and Adoption (see Attachment P - Advertisement, Orlando Sentinel). Public Hearings 401 PAGE 11 OF 12 - January 11, 2016 RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Department — Planning Division requests that the City Commission postpone the Public Hearing for the Second Reading and Adoption of both the Large -Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment and Rezoning to a date certain of February 8, 2016 to allow the City Attorney and Staff to continue to evaluate the issues raised by the adjacent property owner (Hendrix) at the December 14, 2015 City Commission Meeting. ATTACHMENTS: A. Location Map B. Ordinance 2015 -02 C. Ordinance 2015 -03 D. TCEA Map E. Legal Description F. Future Land Use Map G. Zoning Map H. Conceptual Plan (For informational purposes only) L Wetlands Map J. Topo Map K. Soils Map L. Flood Zone Map M. Preliminary Environmental Assessment N. Traffic Impact Analysis (For information only) O. Notification Letter — December 8, 2014 P. Advertisement, Orlando Sentinel - December 3, 2015 Q. City Commission Meeting Minutes, January 26, 2015 R. City Commission Meeting Minutes, December 14, 2015 Public Hearings 401 PAGE 12 OF 12 - January 11, 2016 ll 4� E Lake Mary giWif LOCATION MAP SEMINOLE COUNTY FL Central Winds Late Jesup Park SITE LOCATION % S' m n SR -434 E— SR -434 W — - SR- 434SR?. rr t �r a Q � F Wlnt @r Spfi r A e& " ?usaawdla 419 �'' Round a Country L ake 0 Club yl Broadway St y Park �f > CaT Oviedo K r r= •- 6 pA 'Mail rA V q Lake Rd _ E Mitchell Hatnnmock Rd 0: Oviedo z IBug i+ a p N in Rrv�rs ti 3aif ='I��b �r:.4rr, {::CAF^ u• ~ A b Cr 4y V7 � ix 2300 Maitland Center Parkway Suite 101 0 Maitland Florida, 32751 .7 Phone - (407) 664 -2120 GROUP maitland@ibigroup.com 1 hch = :5,280 feet ORDINANCE NO. 2015 -02 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELATING TO COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING; PROVIDING FOR ADOPTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP FOR TWO (2) PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS CONSISTING OF 18.67 TOTAL ACRES, MORE OR LESS, GENERALLY LOCATED JUST EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF STATE ROAD 434 AND STATE ROAD 417, OVIEDO; SAID PARCELS BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DEPICTED AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO; CHANGING THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION ON THE PARCEL FROM SEMINOLE COUNTY "SUBURBAN ESTATE (SE)" TO CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS "LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL "; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF PRIOR INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS; INCORPORATION INTO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; SEVERABILITY, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND LEGAL STATUS OF THE PLAN AMENDMENT. WHEREAS, the future land use map amendment embodied in this Ordinance is a large scale amendment to the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency of the City of Winter Springs held a duly noticed public hearing on January 7, 2015, in accordance with the procedures established in Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, on the proposed comprehensive plan amendment; and WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed amendment set forth hereunder and considered findings and advice of staff, citizens, and all interested parties submitting written and oral comments and supporting data and analysis, and after complete deliberation, hereby approves and adopts the Comprehensive Plan Amendment set forth hereunder; and WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs hereby finds that this Ordinance is in the best interests of the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Winter Springs. City of Winter Springs Ordinance No. 2015 -02 Page 1 of 3 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS HEREBY ORDAINS, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are fully incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2. Authority. This Ordinance is adopted in compliance with, and pursuant to, the Community Planning Act, formerly known as the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulations Act. Section 3. Purpose and Intent. It is hereby declared to be the purpose and intent of this Ordinance to clarify, expand, correct, update, modify and otherwise further the provisions of the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan. Section 4. Adoption of Amendment to the Future Land Use Map. The City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan, Future Land Use Map, is hereby amended by changing the designation of the real property legally described and depicted on Exhibit "A" from Seminole County "Suburban Estate" to City of Winter Springs "Low Density Residential ". Exhibit "A" is attached hereto and fully incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. Repeal of Prior Inconsistent Ordinances and Resolutions. All prior inconsistent ordinances and resolutions adopted by the City Commission, or parts of prior ordinances and resolutions in conflict herewith, are hereby repealed to the extent of the conflict. Section 6. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, word or provision of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, whether for substantive, procedural, or any other reason, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. Section 7. Incorporation into Comprehensive Plan. Upon the effective date of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment adopted by this Ordinance, said Amendment shall be incorporated into the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan and any section or paragraph number or letter and any heading may be changed or modified as necessary to effectuate the foregoing. Section 8. Effective Date and Legal Status of the Plan Amendment. The effective date of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment adopted by this Ordinance shall be thirty -one (3 1) days after the state land planning agency notifies the City that the plan amendment package is complete pursuant to section 163.3184 (3)(c), Florida Statutes. If the plan amendment is timely challenged, the plan amendment shall not become effective until the state land planning agency or the Administration Commission enters a final order determining the adopted amendment to be in City of Winter Springs Ordinance No. 2015 -02 Page 2 of 3 compliance. No development orders, development permits, or land use dependent on this plan amendment may be issued or commenced before it has become effective. After and from the effective date of this plan amendment, the Comprehensive Plan Amendment set forth herein shall amend the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan and become a part of that plan and the plan amendment shall have the legal status of the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan, as amended. ADOPTED by the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, in a regular meeting assembled on the day of 12015. ATTEST: Andrea Lorenzo - Luaces, City Clerk Approved as to legal form and sufficiency for the City of Winter Springs only: Anthony A. Garganese, City Attorney Legal Ad: First Reading: Second Reading: Charles Lacey, Mayor City of Winter Springs Ordinance No. 2015 -02 Page 3 of 3 Northern Oaks Subdivision (Property ID# 04- 21 -31- 300 - 0090 -0000 & 04- 21 -31- 300 -009A -0000) LEGAL DESCRIPTION AS PROVIDED BY BISHMAN SURVEYING & MAPPING. INC: PARCEL A DESCRIPTION THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 21 S, RANGE 31 E, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA. THE NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4, OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 21 S, RANGE 31 E, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINING 15.347 ACRES, MORE OR LESS PARCEL B DESCRIPTION THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 21 SOUTH, RANGE 31 EAST, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINING 5.132 ACRES, MORE OR LESS TOTAL ACREAGE: 20.479 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. M 9 11 lor-1016i -320[1)► In_ff Ikj AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, CHANGING THE ZONING MAP DESIGNATION OF TWO (2) PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY TOTALING 18.67 GROSS ACRES, MORE OR LESS, GENERALLY LOCATED JUST EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF STATE ROAD 434 AND STATE ROAD 417, OVIEDO, SAID PARCEL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DEPICTED AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO; CHANGING THE ZONING DESIGNATION OF THE PARCEL FROM SEMINOLE COUNTY "AGRICULTURE (A -1)" TO WINTER SPRINGS "ONE FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT (R -1) "; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF PRIOR INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS, SEVERABILITY, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Commission is granted the authority, under Section 2(b), Article VIII, of the State Constitution, to exercise any power for municipal purposes, except when expressly prohibited by law; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Board and City Staff of the City of Winter Springs has recommended approval of this Ordinance at their January 7, 2015, meeting; and WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed zoning change set forth hereunder and considered findings and advice of staff, citizens, and all interested parties submitting written and oral comments and supporting data and analysis, and after complete deliberation, hereby finds the requested change consistent with the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan and that sufficient, competent, and substantial evidence supports the zoning change set forth hereunder; and WHEREAS, the City Commission hereby finds that this Ordinance serves a legitimate government purpose and is in the best interests of the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Winter Springs, Florida. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS HEREBY ORDAINS, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are fully incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2. Zoning Map Amendment. That the Official Zoning Map of the City of Winter Springs, as described in City of Winter Springs Code Section 2015 -03, is hereby amended to to include a change of classification for the property legally described and depicted on Exhibit "A" from "Agriculture (A -1)" to City of Winter Springs "One- Family Dwelling District (R -1) ". Exhibit "A" is attached hereto and fully incorporated herein by this reference. City of Winter Springs Ordinance No. 2015 -03 Page 1 of 2 Section 3. Staff Instructions. City staff is hereby directed to promptly amend the City's Official Zoning Map upon the effective date of this Ordinance. In addition, upon adoption and full execution of this Ordinance by the City Commission, the City Clerk is hereby directed to record this Ordinance in the Official Records of Seminole County, Florida. This Ordinance shall run with the land. Section 4. Repeal of Prior Inconsistent Ordinances and Resolutions. All prior inconsistent ordinances and resolutions adopted by the City Commission, or parts of ordinances and resolutions in conflict herewith, are hereby repealed to the extent of the conflict. Section 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, word or provision of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, whether for substantive, procedural, or any other reason, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. Section 6. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon the effective date of Ordinance No. 2015 -02 as adopted by the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, and pursuant to the City Charter. If Ordinance No. 2015 -02 does not become effective, then this Ordinance shall become null and void. ADOPTED by the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, in a regular meeting assembled on this day of 12015. ATTEST: Andrea Lorenzo - Luaces, City Clerk Approved as to legal form and sufficiency for the City of Winter Springs only: Anthony A. Garganese, City Attorney Charles Lacey, Mayor City of Winter Springs Ordinance No. 2015 -03 Page 2 of 2 Northern Oaks Subdivision (Property ID# 04- 21 -31- 300 - 0090 -0000 & 04- 21 -31- 300 -009A -0000) LEGAL DESCRIPTION AS PROVIDED BY BISHMAN SURVEYING & MAPPING. INC: PARCEL A DESCRIPTION THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 21 S, RANGE 31 E, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA. THE NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4, OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 21 S, RANGE 31 E, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINING 15.347 ACRES, MORE OR LESS PARCEL B DESCRIPTION THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 21 SOUTH, RANGE 31 EAST, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINING 5.132 ACRES, MORE OR LESS TOTAL ACREAGE: 20.479 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. CITY OF LONG .............. mn JF�0 P-J, Transport@ k�4 IL 7.0 Im A ff 4P Cit� of WinterSPrings ComPrekensive Pan tion Concurrency Exception Area %TCEA) Zones January 2015 \, 0 l5 Y Lake Jesup OR% IN ELB -t; ix ty N 0 0.250I .5 1 Miles Be S CITY OF OVIEDO Source- Wiriter Springs'Planning Division, R- Woodruff. October 2010 Northern Oaks Subdivision (Property ID# 04- 21 -31- 300 - 0090 -0000 & 04- 21 -31- 300 -009A -0000) LEGAL DESCRIPTION AS PROVIDED BY BISHMAN SURVEYING & MAPPING. INC: PARCEL A DESCRIPTION THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 21 S, RANGE 31 E, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA. THE NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4, OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 21 S, RANGE 31 E, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINING 15.347 ACRES, MORE OR LESS PARCEL B DESCRIPTION THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 21 SOUTH, RANGE 31 EAST, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINING 5.132 ACRES, MORE OR LESS TOTAL ACREAGE: 20.479 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. C O 0 0 U N Y 7 m W, O N O M O) N O O� 3 Q w lei c 0 0 0 a a� U C O U W O O M c n a Q) U C O U O O 0 U / O C O a7 L / O O M Blo -Tech Consulting Inc. Environmental and Petmirting Services 2002 E. Robinson St. Orlando, FI, 32803 Ph: 407 - 894 -5969 Fax: 407 - 894 -5970 www.bio-techconsulting.com State Road 434 Subdivision Site N Seminole County, Florida W E Figure 6 Wetland Flag Exhibit S 0 50 100 200 Feet Project #: 579 -04 Produced By: SAW Date: 11/4/2014 �in h = 2ay.feet �0 5�Q0 7.a[i LASS AVE i .._ IB`_" 23OO,Maitland,Center•Parkw 11 Y, r Maitland Flonda,'327513 e Phone - ,,(4(37} 666--2 124 e GROUP maitland e@ibigrou r � E S.Qp Ro 41 ;Qp 0, 5 A-* IOU,, F L 4'l1n 4- M•,►, .rte t IF-ill - Y Y 1 -W'J'. I in I - �n`!4 1 V. o f N A'4. Legend SITE BOUNDARY MD EA. nch � 25Q feet.. - - - - - 5.111 MA P _PINE S, 2300'MaitlaU n-Or P Maitland IB-1 7 Phone - (401),660 -2120 C =R©L`f maitiand @ibigroup.`com :. GROUP C SOILS M r- Legend MSITE BOUNDARY MRCS SOILS ASTATULA FINE SAND, 0 TO 5 % SLOPES BASINGER AND SMYRNA FINE SANDS, DEP BASINGER, SAMSULA, AND HONTOON SOILS, DEP MYAKKAAND EAUGALLIE FINE SANDS POMELLO FINE SAND, 0 TO 5 % SLOPES f r , W'." 1 - •°. .,'��•:'k +; ; � 'rte. � � � - MIT 40 —W. SR 434 W SR °434` �W SR•434W'SR 434W.SR.434 � CASSAVE CI4SS AVE tz —PINE STS T PINES,,; Legend QSITE BOUNDARY Ma and itla Mod Center, rkwa Since 101 '� FLOOD ZONE -- ,�, ♦.��, ' rye.? Phone °- ((407) 6 -212{? ♦�.r°`���`�v�o �� %,sC�i�,��y tip;, �. ?', >� A GR()LP !2300 maitiand@ibigroup -corn }� . •� e�er'rs F. AE Bio -Tech Consulting Inc. Environmental and Permitting Services November 6, 2014 info @bio- techconsulting.com www.bio- techconsulting.com Christopher E. Dorworth 1520 Whitstable Court Lake Mary, Florida 32746 Proj: State Road 434 Subdivision Site - Seminole County, Florida Parcel IDs #04- 21 -31- 300 - 0090 -0000 and #04- 21 -31- 300 -009A -0000 (BTC File #579 -04) Re: Environmental Assessment Report Dear Mr. Dorworth: During November of 2014, Bio -Tech Consulting, Inc. (BTC) conducted an environmental assessment of the approximately 18.67 -acre State Road 434 Subdivision Site. This site is located just east of the intersection of State Roads 434 and 417 (Central Florida GreeneWay), within Section 04, Township 21 South, Range 31 East, Seminole County, Florida (Figures 1, 2 and 3). This environmental assessment included the following elements: • Review of soil types mapped within the site boundaries; • evaluation of land use types /vegetative communities present; • field review for occurrence of protected flora and fauna; and • discussion of anticipated development constraints. SOILS According to the Soil Survey of Seminole County, Florida, prepared by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resource Conservation Service (MRCS), four (4) soil types exist within the subject property boundaries (Figure 4). These soil types include the following: Orlando Vero Beach Jacksonville Tampa Key West Christopher E. Dorworth State Road 434 Subdivision Site - Seminole County, FL (BTC File #579 -04) Environmental Assessment Page 2 of 11 • Basinger, Samsula and Hontoon soils, depressional ( #10) • Basinger and Smyrna fine sands, depressional ( #11) • Myakka and EauGallie fine sands ( #20) • Pomello fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes ( #27) The following presents a brief description of each of the soil types mapped for the subject property: Basinger, Samsula and Hontoon soils, depressional ( #10) are nearly level, very poorly drained soils found in swamps and depressions. Typically the surface layer of Basinger soil consists of very dark gray mucky fine sand about 6 inches thick. The surface layer of Samsula soil typically consists of muck about 30 inches thick. Typically the surface layer of Hontoon soil consists of dark reddish brown muck about 18 inches thick. During most years, the undrained areas of the soils in this map unit are ponded for 6 to 9 months or more. The permeability of this soil unit is rapid. Basinger and Smyrna fine sands, depressional ( #11) are nearly level, very poorly drained soils found in depressions. Typically the surface layer of Basinger soil consists of black mucky fine sand about 5 inches thick. Typically the surface layer of Smyrna soil consists of black fine sand about 2 inches thick. During most years undrained areas of this soil unit are ponded for 6 to 9 months. The permeability of Basinger soil is rapid. The permeability of Smyrna soil is rapid in the surface and subsurface, moderate or moderately rapid in the subsoil, and rapid in the substratum. Myakka and EauGallie fine sands ( #20) are nearly level, poorly drained soils found on broad plains on the flatwoods. Typically the surface layer of Myakka soil consists of black fine sand about 5 inches thick. The surface layer of EauGallie soil typically consists of dark gray fine sand about 5 inches thick. During most years the seasonal high table for this soil type is within 12 inches of the surface for 1 to 4 months. The permeability of Myakka soil is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers and in the substratum and moderate or moderately rapid in the subsoil. The permeability of EauGallie soil is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers, moderate or moderately rapid in the sandy part of the subsoil and moderately slow in the loamy part of the subsoil. Pomello fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes ( #27) is a nearly level to gently sloping, moderately well drained soils found on low ridges and knolls on the flatwoods. Typically the surface layer of this soil type is light gray fine sand about 2 inches thick. In most years, the seasonal high water table for this soil type is at a depth of 36 to 60 inches for 1 to 4 months. The permeability of this soil type is very rapid in the surface and subsurface layers, moderately rapid in the subsoil, and rapid in the substratum. Christopher E. Dorworth State Road 434 Subdivision Site - Seminole County, FL (BTC File #579- 04.05) Environmental Assessment Page 3 of 11 The Florida Association of Environmental Soil Scientists (FAESS) considers the Basinger, Samsula and Hontoon soils, depressional ( #10) and Basinger and Smyrna fine sands, depressional ( #11) soil types associated with the property to be a hydric soil. Furthermore, the FAESS considers inclusions present in the Myakka and EauGallie fine sands ( #20) soil type associated with the property to be hydric. This information can be found in the Hydric Soils of Florida Handbook, Third Edition, March 2000. LAND USE TYPES/VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES The State Road 434 Subdivision Site currently supports five (5) land use types /vegetative communities within its boundaries. These land use types /vegetative communities were identified utilizing the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System, Level III (FLUCFCS, FDOT, January 2004) (Figure 5). The upland land use types /vegetative communities on the site are classified as Hardwood - Conifer Mixed (434), Disturbed Land (740) and Communication Facility (822). The wetland/surface water land use types /vegetative communities on the site are classified as Reservoirs (530) and Wetland Forested Mixed (630). The following provides a brief description of the on -site land use types /vegetative communities identified on the site: Uplands: 434 Hardwood -Con ifer Mixed The southern portion of the site is dominated by an upland mixed forested system that is best classified as Hardwood - Conifer Mixed (192), per the FLUCFCS. There is a smaller area located within the southwestern portion of the site and a larger area within the south - central and southeastern portions of the site. Within this south - central area are a few concrete slabs (apparently old foundations) and some dilapidated pole barns, along with a primitive driveway leading to the communication facility. In some areas the understory has recently been cleared. Vegetation observed within this land use type includes slash pine (Pinus elliottii), live oak (Quercus virginiana), laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), southern magnolia (Magnolia grandiflora), red cedar (Juniperus virginiana), pignut hickory (Carya glabra), camphortree (Cinnamomum camphora), cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), American beautyberry (Callicarpa americana), elderberry (Sambucus nigra), Japanese yew (Podocarpus macrophyllus), caesarweed (Urena lobata), winged sumac (Rhus copallinum), rattlebox (Crotalaria spp), nightshade (Solanum spp), cast iron plant (Aspidistra elatior), bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum), St. Augustinegrass (Stenotaphrum secundatum), goldenrod (Salidago spp.), creeping oxeye (Sphagneticola trilobata), tuberous sword fern (Nephrolepis cordifolia), beggarticks (Bidens alba), Durban crowfootgrass (Dactyloctenium aegyptium), muscadine grapevine (Vitis rotundifolia), greenbriar (Smilax spp.), Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia), air - potato (Dioscorea bulbifera), common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia), brackenfern (Pteridium aquilinum), broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus), hairy indigo (Indigofera hirsuta) and various ornamental plants. Bio -Tech Consulting Inc. Env%ronmental and Permitting Services Christopher E. Dorworth State Road 434 Subdivision Site - Seminole County, FL (BTC File #579- 04.05) Environmental Assessment Page 4 of 11 740 Disturbed Land An area within the south - central portion of the site contains multiple piles of fill dirt which has become overgrown with vegetation and this area is best classified as Disturbed Land (740), per the FLUCFCS. Vegetation observed within this land use type includes earpod tree (Enterolobium contortisiliquum), cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), American beautyberry (Callicarpa americana), elderberry (Sambucus nigra), lantana (Lantana camara), caesarweed (Urena lobata), guineagrass (Panicum maximum), winged sumac (Rhus copallinum), Mexican clover (Richardia scabra), dogfennel (Eupatorium capillifolium), rattlebox (Crotalaria spp.), nightshade (Solanum spp), goldenrod (Solidago spp.), creeping oxeye (Sphagneticola trilobata), beggarticks (Bidens alba), Durban crowfootgrass (Dactyloctenium aegyptium), rose natalgrass (Melinis repens), muscadine grapevine (Vitis rotundifolia), greenbriar (Smilax spp.), Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia), air - potato (Dioscorea bulbifera), common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia), brackenfern (Pteridium aquilinum), broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus) and hairy indigo (Indigofera hirsuta). 822 Communication Facility Located within the eastern- central portion of the site is a communication tower, building and associated infrastructure that is best described as Communication Facility (822), per the FLUCFCS. This area has a perimeter chain -link fence with a rock and gravel groundcover without any vegetative species present inside its boundary. Wetlands /Surface Waters: 530 Reservoirs Located within the northern portion of the site is an excavated pond that is best classified as Reservoirs (530), per the FLUCFCS. Vegetation observed within this land use /community type includes common buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis), marsh pennywort (Hydrocotyle umbellata), sedges (Carex and Cyperus spp), torpedograss (Panicum repens) and duckweed (Lemna spp.). 630 Wetland Forested Mixed The majority of the northern portion of the site and a connected area within the southwestern portion of the site is a forested wetland system that is best classified as Wetland Forested Mixed (630), per the FLUCFCS. This forested wetland system extends off -site to the north, northeast and northwest and is hydrologically connected to Lake Jessup. Vegetation observed within this community type includes slash pine (Pinus elliottii), pond pine (Pinus serotina), laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), water oak (Quercus nigra), red maple (Ater rubrum), Carolina willow (Salix caroliniana), sweetbay (Magnolia virginiana), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), Bio -Tech Consulting Inc. Env%ronmental and Permitting Services Christopher E. Dorworth State Road 434 Subdivision Site - Seminole County, FL (BTC File #579- 04.05) Environmental Assessment Page 5 of 11 cypress (Taxodium distichum), loblolly bay (Gordonia lasianthus), cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), common buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis), saltbush (Baccharis halimifolia), needle palm (Rhapidophyllum hystrix), Peruvian primrosewillow (Ludwigia peruviana), yellow - eyed grass (Xyris spp.), tuberous sword fern (Nephrolepis eordifolia), caesarweed (Urena lobata), marsh pennywort (Hydrocotyle umbellata), maidencane (Panicum hemitomon), wild taro (Colocasia esculenta), green arum (Peltandra virginica), Virginia chain fern (Pteridium aquilinum), cinnamon fern (Osmunda cinnamomea), royal fern (Osmunda regalis), wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera), muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia), caesarweed (Urena lobata) and sedges (Carex and Cyperus spp). On -site wetlands and surface waters have been delineated by BTC utilizing pink flagging tape (Figure 6). The limits of any on -site wetlands /surface waters can only be determined and verified through field delineation and/or on -site review by the pertinent regulatory agencies. PROTECTED SPECIES Using methodologies outlined in the Florida's Fragile Wildlife (Wood, 2001); Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity Standard Methods for Mammals (Wilson, et al., 1996); Wildlife Methodology Guidelines (1988); and Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FFWCC's) Gopher Tortoise Permitting Guidelines (revised April 2013); an assessment for "listed" floral and faunal species was conducted at the site on November 3, 2014. This assessment included both direct observations and indirect evidence, such as tracks, burrows, tree markings and vocalizations that indicated the presence of species observed. The assessment focused on species that are "listed" by the FFWCC's Official Lists - Florida's Endangered Species, Threatened Species and Species of Special Concern (January 2013) that have the potential to occur in Seminole County (see attached Table 1). Two (2) plant species were identified that are listed as "commercially exploited" by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS). The harvesting of these species, cinnamon fern (Osmunda cinnamomea) and royal fern (Osmunda regalis), for commercial gain, is not permitted. The listing of these species poses no restrictions towards the development of the subject property. The following is a list of those wildlife species identified during the evaluation of the site: Reptiles and Amphibians brown anole (Norops sagrei) eastern black racer (Coluber constrictor) Florida leopard frog (Lithobates sphenocephalus sphenocephalus) green anole (Anolis carolinensis) green tree frog (Hyla cinerea) Bio -Tech Consulting Inc. Env%ronmental and Permitting Services Christopher E. Dorworth State Road 434 Subdivision Site - Seminole County, FL (BTC File #579- 04.05) Environmental Assessment Page 6 of l l Birds American Crow (Corvus caurinus) Black Vulture (Coragyps atratus) Mourning Dove (Zenaida macroura) Northern Cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis) Northern Mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos) Osprey (Pandion haliaetus) Mammals eastern gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) common raccoon (Procyon lotor) marsh rabbit (Sylvilagus palustris) nine - banded armadillo (Dasypus novemcinctus) white - tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) Virginia possum (Didelphis virginiana) One (1) of the above identified species is listed in the FFWCC's Official Lists - Florida's Endangered Species, Threatened Species and Species of Special Concern (January 2013). This species is the Osprey (Pandion haliaetus). The Osprey is currently listed as "Species of Special Concern" by the State. The following provides a brief description of this species as it relates to development of the property. Osprey (Pandion haliaetus) State Listed as "Species of Special Concern " (Monroe County only) Located on top of the communication tower is an Osprey nest. The Osprey is federally protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 703- 712) and state protected by Chapter 68A of the Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). Pursuant to the federal act, it is unlawful to take, possess, buy, sell, purchase, or barter any migratory bird, including feathers or other parts, nests, eggs, or products, except as allowed by implementing regulations. Although both active and inactive osprey nests are protected Federally, only active nests require Federal permits for taking. The specific state regulation protecting Ospreys is rule 68A- 4.001, F.A.C., which prohibits the taking or transporting of "...wildlife ... or their nests, eggs, young, homes, or dens." Ospreys and their nests in Monroe County are provided even further protection by virtue of that population being listed as a "species of special concern" (rule 68A- 27.005 F.A.C.), thereby protected by rule 68A- 27.002, F.A.C. Exceptions to these regulations are provided in rule 68A- 9.002, F.A.C., which allows the FFWCC to issue permits authorizing the taking or possession of wildlife or their nests for management or other "justifiable purposes." Bio -Tech Consulting Inc. Env%ronmental and Permitting Services Christopher E. Dorworth State Road 434 Subdivision Site - Seminole County, FL (BTC File #579- 04.05) Environmental Assessment Page 7 of 11 Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) State protected by F.A. C. 68A- 16.002 and federally protected by both the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (1918) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (1940) In August of 2007, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ( USFWS) removed the Bald Eagle from the list of federally endangered and threatened species. Additionally, the Bald Eagle was removed from FFWCC's imperiled species list in April of 2008. Although the Bald Eagle is no longer protected under the Endangered Species Act, it is still protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and FFWCC's Bald Eagle rule (Florida Administrative Code 68A - 16.002 Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leuehoeephalus). In May of 2007, the USFWS issued the National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines. In April of 2008, the FFWCC adopted a new Bald Eagle Management Plan that was written to closely follow the federal guidelines. Under FFWCC's new management plans, buffer zones are recommended based on the nature and magnitude of the project or activity. The recommended protective buffer zone is 660 -feet or less from the nest tree, depending on what activities or structures are already near the nest. A FFWCC Eagle permit is not needed for any activity occurring outside of the 660 -foot buffer zone. No activities are permitted within 330 -feet of a nest during the nesting season, October 1 through May 15 or when Eagles are present at the nest. In addition to the preliminary on -site review for "listed" species, BTC conducted a review for any FFWCC recorded Bald Eagle nests on or in the vicinity of the subject property (see attached). This review revealed six (6) recorded Bald Eagle nests site within one (1.0) mile of the subject property. FFWCC Bald Eagle nest #5E -031 is located approximately 1,630 -feet to the west and was last surveyed in 2011 and last known active in 2002. FFWCC Bald Eagle nest #5E -004 is located approximately 2,630 -feet to the southwest and was last surveyed in 2011 and last known active in 2011. FFWCC Bald Eagle nest #5E -045 is located approximately 3,155 - feet to the north and was last surveyed in 2011 and last known active in 2011. FFWCC Bald Eagle nest #5E -091 is located approximately 3,540 -feet to the southwest and was last surveyed in 2013 and last known active in 2013. FFWCC Bald Eagle nest #5E -066 is located approximately 3,550 -feet to the northwest and was last surveyed in 2011 and last known active in 2011. FFWCC Bald Eagle nest #5E -018 is located approximately 4,510 -feet to the northeast and was last surveyed in 2011 and last known active in 2011. All of these nests, at their current locations as provided by FFWCC, are outside the 660 -foot Eagle Protection Zone and should not constrain development of the site. Bio -Tech Consulting Inc. Env%ronmental and Permitting Services Christopher E. Dorworth State Road 434 Subdivision Site - Seminole County, FL (BTC File #579- 04.05) Environmental Assessment Page 8 of 11 USFWS Consultation Areas The USFWS has established "consultation areas" for certain listed species. Generally, these consultation areas only become an issue if USFWS consultation is required, which is usually associated with permitting through the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE). The reader should be aware that species presence and need for additional review are often determined to be unnecessary early in the permit review process due to lack of appropriate habitat or other conditions. However, the USFWS makes the final determination. Consultation areas are typically very regional in size, often spanning multiple counties where the species in question is known to exist. Consultation areas by themselves do not indicate the presence of a listed species. They only indicate an area where there is a potential for a listed species to occur and that additional review might be necessary to confirm or rule -out the presence of the species. The additional review typically includes the application of species - specific criteria to rule -out or confirm the presence of the species in question. Such criteria might consist of a simple review for critical habitat types. In other cases, the review might include the need for species - specific surveys using established methodologies that have been approved by the USFWS. The State Road 434 Subdivision Site is located within four (4) USFWS Consultation Areas which include the Audubon's Crested Caracara (Polyborus plancus audubonii), Everglade Snail Kite (Rostrhamus sociabilis plumbeus), Florida Scrub -Jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens) and the Wood Stork (Mycteria americana). The following provides a brief description of the respective species, its habitat and the potential for additional review: Audubon's Crested Caracara (Polyborus plan cus audubonii) Federally Listed as "Threatened" The subject site falls within the USFWS Consultation Areas for the species, Audubon's Crested Caracara (Polyborus planeus audubonii). Currently the Crested Caracara is listed as "Threatened" by the USFWS due primarily to habitat loss. The Audubon's Crested Caracara is a large species of raptor that can reach a body length of 19.7 -25.2 inches (50 -64 centimeters). The Audubon's Crested Caracara has a dark brown -black belly, wings, back, and crown; and a white lower belly, head, and throat. They also have a bluish -gray to light bluish dark yellow to white bill, red cere (facial skin), and a white tail with dark crossbars. The Audubon's Crested Caracara is a resident of the prairies and range lands of south - central Florida. The Crested Caracara commonly occurs in dry or wet prairie areas with scattered cabbage plains, lightly wooded areas with saw palmetto, scrub oaks and cypress. The Caracara also uses improved or semi - improved pasture with seasonal wetlands. This species is most abundant in a six - county area north and west of Lake Okeechobee (Desoto, Glades, Hendry, Highlands, Okeechobee and Osceola counties). Crested Caracaras construct new nests each nesting season, often in the same tree as the previous year. Bio -Tech Consulting Inc. Env%ronmental and Permitting Services Christopher E. Dorworth State Road 434 Subdivision Site - Seminole County, FL (BTC File #579- 04.05) Environmental Assessment Page 9 of 11 Although the subject site falls within the USFWS Audubon's Crested Caracara consultation area, no Crested Caracaras were observed and little suitable habitat for this species exists within the project boundaries. No further action should be required pertaining to the Crested Caracara. Everglade Snail Kite (Rostrhamus sociabilis plumbeus) Federally Listed as "Endangered" The subject site falls within the USFWS Consultation Area for the Snail Kite. Currently the Snail Kite is listed as "Endangered" by the USFWS. Snail Kites are similar in size to Red - shouldered Hawks. All Snail Kites have deep red eyes and a white rump patch. Males are slate gray, and females and juveniles vary in amounts of white, light brown, and dark brown, but the females always have white on their chin. Kites vocalize mainly during courtship and nesting. They may occur in nearly all of the wetlands of central and southern Florida. They regularly occur in lake shallows along the shores and islands of many major lakes, including Lakes Okeechobee, Kissimmee, Tohopekaliga (Toho) and East Toho. They also regularly occur in the expansive marshes of southern Florida such as Water Conservation Areas 1, 2, and 3, Everglades National Park, the upper St. John's River marshes and Grassy Waters Preserve. No Snail Kites were observed within the subject site during the wildlife survey conducted by BTC. There is minimal suitable habitat for this species within the project boundaries. No further action should be required pertaining to the Snail Kite. Florida Scrub -Jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens) Federally Listed as "Threatened" The subject site falls within the USFWS Consultation Area for the Florida Scrub -Jay. Currently the Florida Scrub -Jay is listed as "Threatened" by the USFWS. Florida Scrub Jays are largely restricted to scattered, often small and isolated patches of sand pine scrub, xeric oak, scrubby flatwoods, and scrubby coastal stands in peninsular Florida (Woolfenden 1978a, Fitzpatrick et al. 1991). They avoid wetlands and forests, including canopied sand pine stands. Optimal Scrub - Jay habitat is dominated by shrubby scrub, live oaks, myrtle oaks, or scrub oaks from 1 to 3 in (3 to 10 ft.) tall, covering 50 to 90% the area; bare ground or sparse vegetation less than 15 cm (6 in) tall covering 10 to 50% of the area; and scattered trees with no more than 20% canopy cover (Fitzpatrick et al. 1991). An informal Scrub -Jay survey was conducted utilizing a "call tape" and no Florida Scrub -Jays were observed within the subject site during the wildlife survey. There is no suitable habitat for this species within the project boundaries. No further action should be required pertaining to the Florida Scrub -Jay. Bio -Tech Consulting Inc. Env%ronmental and Permitting Services Christopher E. Dorworth State Road 434 Subdivision Site - Seminole County, FL (BTC File #579- 04.05) Environmental Assessment Page 10 of 11 Wood Stork (Mycteria americana) Federally Listed as "Endangered" The subject site is shown to be located within a Wood Stork Nesting Colony Core Foraging Area. Wood Storks typically nest colonially in medium to tall trees that occur in stands located either in swamps or on islands surrounded by relatively broad expanses of open water (Ogden 1991; Rodgers et al. 1996). The Wood Stork (Mycteria americana) is listed as "Endangered" by the USFWS. Wood storks are large, long - legged wading birds, about 45 inches tall, with a wingspan of 60 to 65 inches. Their plumage is white except for black primaries and secondaries and a short black tail. The head and neck are largely unfeathered and dark gray in color. The bill is black, thick at the base, and slightly decurved. Wood Storks are birds of freshwater and estuarine wetlands, primarily nesting in cypress or mangrove swamps. Successful breeding sites are those that have limited human disturbance and low exposure to land based predators. Because of their specialized feeding behavior, Wood Storks forage most effectively in shallow -water areas with highly concentrated prey. Typical foraging sites for the Wood Stork include freshwater marshes, depressions in cypress heads, swamp sloughs, managed impoundments, stock ponds, shallow - seasonally flooded roadside or agricultural ditches and narrow tidal creeks or shallow tidal pools. Good foraging conditions are characterized by water that is relatively calm, open, and having water depths between 5 and 15 inches (5 and 38 cm). The USFWS has identified core foraging area (CFA) around all known Wood Stork nesting colonies that is important for reproductive success. In Central Florida, CFAs include suitable foraging habitat (SFH) within a 15 -mile radius of the nest colony; CFAs in North Florida include SFH within a 13 -mile radius of a colony. The USFWS believes loss of suitable foraging wetlands within these CFAs may reduce foraging opportunities for the Wood Stork. Based on our review of available databases, there is no record of a Wood Stork rookery on the project site or within close proximity. The USFWS and the USACOE require that any impacts to on -site ditches and/or wetlands, which would eliminate a portion of the Wood Stork foraging habitat, be either mitigated through the purchase of mitigation credits or recreated elsewhere on- site so that there would be no net loss of Wood Stork foraging habitat. No Wood Storks were observed within the subject site during the wildlife survey conducted by BTC; however, mitigation for Wood Stork habitat may be required if ditches or wetlands are impacted. Bio -Tech Consulting Inc. Env%ronmental and Permitting Services Christopher E. Dorworth State Road 434 Subdivision Site - Seminole County, FL (BTC File #579- 04.05) Environmental Assessment Page 11 of 11 The environmental limitations described in this document are based on observations and technical information available on the date of the on -site evaluation. This report is for general planning purposes only. The limits of any on -site wetlands /surface waters can only be determined and verified through field delineation and /or on -site review by the pertinent regulatory agencies. The wildlife surveys conducted within the subject property boundaries do not preclude the potential for any listed species, as noted on Table 1 (attached), currently or in the future. Should you have any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact our office at (407) 894 -5969. Thank you. attachments Regards, Bill Keenan Project Manager John Miklos President Bio -Tech Consulting Inc. xavirnnmental and Permitting Services r.., Way I hkl ay, S V ithl pan.91 La, +e2up VJef Rc mark St Bio-Tech Consulting Inc. Ell1rifonniental and Permitting Sef%,ic" 2002 E. Robinson St. Orlando, F1, 32803 Ph: 407-894-5969 Fax: 407-894-5970 www.bio-techconsulting.com State Road 434 Subdivision Site N 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles I I I I I I I I I Seminole County, Florida w E Project #: 579-04 Figure 1 Produced By: SAW General Location Map S Date: 10/31/2014 Cadfflx St letup UNA it Fen % 4_ Winter art Sprin Milky WZY 9. T F'a,ita Aye !4' RA'434 *$Rr4ig SEW-411-N.9 R41S4 E eo E T., CV4, "�'r 81�d 4: *7 IINL P�Lhar &I at "k, a ER 'Ck 40 u txr Or k Fa mo"o —awrwr&:Dr-c FF.rrqh11­91 E Kgd Wi S KinpSt Lk. E Ell iao. I St F� smG 9-, M-IN ; Oe "'M J LwrV 39%.an Dr IN Z 0,ne, ka tq . I e L 14 —W-Nbehall Ham Rd t N1111h1A I H Rd Oviedo k. 11­i 15uil UPI: R I S!­ F I M.f1a; L� qb. -Z Legend Gtp :7 -IN. k1. Sources: Esri, HERE, ueL-orme:,QJSGS, Intbrmap, increment P'Qqrp_ NRCAN, State Road 434 Subdivision Site Esri Japan, METE; Esri China (Hong Kong),'E!sri (Thailand), TomTqm, ' MapmyIndia, @ Qp6n_�i�.eetMap contributors, and the GIS User� Community Bio-Tech Consulting Inc. Ell1rifonniental and Permitting Sef%,ic" 2002 E. Robinson St. Orlando, F1, 32803 Ph: 407-894-5969 Fax: 407-894-5970 www.bio-techconsulting.com State Road 434 Subdivision Site N 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles I I I I I I I I I Seminole County, Florida w E Project #: 579-04 Figure 1 Produced By: SAW General Location Map S Date: 10/31/2014 9GCCCCGGgCGGpppCC000CrCC GCOCCCOGCirCGOGCC- CpCGCCGGCpC= iCGCGCCCGCGCCGCG6C- ❑CCC�I F1 u El El o r of f i u L F1 El ❑ CI F1 n ❑ Li ❑. ❑ I� ll [1 fl IJ ❑ fl II II Il ❑ooppp GcG�- __occ_ �ccoC cpcc� 5 yy�ry,, r i f 1 "•t { Legend [�1ooE:=Io S�oC7I State Road 434 Subdivision Site ID Blo -Tech Consulting Inc. i Environmental and Petmirting Services 2002 E. Robinson St. Orlando, FI, 32803 Ph: 407 - 894 -5969 Fax: 407 - 894 -5970 www.bio-techconsulting.com �I T I State Road 434 Subdivision Site N 0 75 150 300 Feet Seminole County, Florida w E Project #: 579 -04 Figure 2 Produced By: SAW 2012 Aerial Photograph S Date: 10/31/2014 _+YL�5 .ems .,`tY�,rt ••Ila.� �ti41�__, ,_ _tier, •tiEi• • "ALL _ Ab- -4 _tile. �� �_ F � �_ ,�� '•sY�'`— _Ui� r .�„� - r11J�r al ir•— y IE it R Ik 4 w r-m-r Legend ■ ■ -Aha �• �.. .--rte � r ono❑ 0 F1 [H) State Road 434 Subdivision Site Bio -Tech Consulting Inc. Eetvirmimental and Pertnittitng Services 2002 E. Robinson St. Orlando, FL 32803 Ph: 407 - 894 -5969 Fax: 407 - 894 -5970 www.bio- techconsulting.com N. N1 ■ ■ M State Road 434 Subdivision Site " 0 250 500 1,000 Feet Seminole County, Florida w E Project #: 579 -04 Figure 3 Produced By: SAW USGS Topographic Map S Date: 10/31/2014 � Blo -Tech Consulting Inc. r Environmental and Petmirting Services 2002 E. Robinson St. Orlando, FI, 32803 Ph: 407 - 894 -5969 Fax: 407 - 894 -5970 www.bio-techconsulting.com State Road 434 Subdivision Site N Seminole County, Florida W E Figure 4 USDA -NRCS Soils Map S 0 75 150 300 Feet Project #: 579 -04 Produced By: SAW Date: 10/31/2014 - ccccoccccc�ccccc�ccccc _c�ccc�ccccc�cccc� --------------------- II II II II II ° Cd.A7 I I II II ❑ it fl II ll II IJ Il CI I I �� II ❑ - II I1 II ❑ t u n ° ❑ Il ❑_., - u n Legend , State Road 434 Subdivision Site �f a'` L.... - 434 - Hardwood - Conifer Mixed } 530 - Reservoirs 630 - Wetland Forested Mixed 740 - Disturbed Land I 822 - Communication Facility - I State Road 434 Subdivision Site N 0 50 100 200 Feet Blo -Tech Consulting Inc. Seminole County, Florida w E Project #: 579 -04 Environmental and Petmirting Services 2002 E. Robinson St. Orlando, FL 32803 T TFigure 5 Produced By: SAW w bio -echco s Fax: 407 - 894 -5970 FL CFCS Map Date: 11/4/2014 wwwbio- techconsulting.com S Blo -Tech Consulting Inc. Environmental and Petmirting Services 2002 E. Robinson St. Orlando, FI, 32803 Ph: 407 - 894 -5969 Fax: 407 - 894 -5970 www.bio-techconsulting.com State Road 434 Subdivision Site N Seminole County, Florida W E Figure 6 Wetland Flag Exhibit S 0 50 100 200 Feet Project #: 579 -04 Produced By: SAW Date: 11/4/2014 Table 1: Potentially Occurring Listed Wildlife and Plant Species in Seminole County, Florida Scientific Name Common Name Federal Status State Status Occurrence Status FISH Pteronotro is welaka bluenose shiner N LS C AMPHIBIANS Lithobates capito gopher fro N LS P REPTILES _ Alli ator mississi iensis American alligator T S/A LS C D marchon corais cou eri Eastern indigo snake LT LT C Go herus of hemus gopher tortoise N LT C Pituo his melanoleucus mu itus Florida pine snake N LS C Stilosoma extenuatum short- tailed snake N LT P BIRDS A helocoma coerulescens Florida scrub-jay LT LT C Aramus guarauna lim kin N LS P E retta caerulea little blue heron N LS C E retta thula snowy egret N LS C E retta tricolor tricolored heron N LS C Eudocimus albus white ibis N LS P Falco sparverius paulus southeastern American kestrel N LT P Grus canadensis pratensis Florida sandhill crane N LT C Haliaeetus leucoce halus bald eagle MC * C M cteria americana wood stork LE LE P Pandion haliaetus osprey N LS ** C Picoides borealis red - cockaded woodpecker LE LE C MAMMALS Podom s oridanus Florida mouse N LS C Sciurus ni er shermani Sherman's fox squirrel N LS C Trichechus manatus (Trichechus manatus latirostris ) West Indian manatee (Florida manatee LE LE C PLANTS MM Carex chapmanii Chapman's Sedge N LE C Centrosema arenicola Sand Butterfly Pea N LE C Cucurbita okeechobeensis Okeechobee Gourd LE LE C Dennstaedtia bipinnata hay scented fern N LE C Illicium parviflorum star anise N LE C Lechea cernua nodding pinweed N LT C Lechea cernua nodding inweed N LT C O hio lossum palmatum Hand Fern N LE C Salix oridana Florida willow N LE C FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS LE- Endangered: species in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range LT- Threatened: species likely to become Endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range. E(S /A)- Endangered due to similarity of appearance to a species which is federally listed such that enforcement personnel have difficulty in attempting to differentiate between the listed and unlisted species. T(S /A)- Threatened due to similarity of appearance (see above). PE- Proposed for listing as Endangered species. PT- Proposed for listing as Threatened species. C- Candidate species for which federal listing agencies have sufficient information on biological vulnerability and threats to support proposing to list the species as Endangered or Threatened. XN- Non - essential experimental population. MC -Not currently listed, but of management concern to USFWS. N -Not currently listed, nor currently being considered for listing as Endangered or Threatened. STATE LEGAL STATUS - ANIMALS LE- Endangered: species, subspecies, or isolated population so few or depleted in number or so restricted in range that it is in imminent danger of extinction. LT- Threatened: species, subspecies, or isolated population facing a very high risk of extinction in the future. LS- Species of Special Concern is a species, subspecies, or isolated population which is facing a moderate risk of extinction in the future. PE- Proposed for listing as Endangered. PT- Proposed for listing as Threatened. PS- Proposed for listing as Species of Special Concern. N -Not currently listed, nor currently being considered for listing. * State protected by F.A.C. 68A- 16.002 and federally protected by both the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (1918) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (1940) ** See Rank and Status Explanations and Definitions, Special Animal Listings - Federal and State Status STATE LEGAL STATUS - PLANTS LE- Endangered: species of plants native to Florida that are in imminent danger of extinction within the state, the survival of which is unlikely if the causes of a decline in the number of plants continue; includes all species determined to be endangered or threatened pursuant to the U.S. Endangered Species Act. LT- Threatened: species native to the state that are in rapid decline in the number of plants within the state, but which have not so decreased in number as to cause them to be Endangered. PE- Proposed for listing as Endangered. PT- Proposed for listing as Threatened. N -Not currently listed, nor currently being considered for listing. COUNTY OCCURRENCE STATUS Vertebrates and Invertebrates: C= Confirmed P = Potential N = Nesting Plants: C = Confirmed R = Reported This report was generated using the bald eagle nest locator at https:// public. myfwc. com/ FWRI /EagieNests /nestiocator.aspx on 10/17/2014 2:14:39 PM. Search Entered: Within 2 miles of west SR 434 and 1340 MACTAVANDASH drive (latitude 28.6902551 and longitude - 81.2187754); All Search Results 8 record(s) were found; 8 record(s) are shown Bald Eagle Nest Map: Bald Eagle Nest Data Search Results: Results per page: All v Let - ter Nest ID County Town- Latitude Longitude ship Ran- ge Sec- tion Gaz Page Last Known Active Last Sur- veyed Act 9 Act 10 Act 11 Act 12 Act 13 Dist. (Mi) A SE003 Seminole d 81 14.87 21S 31E 37 80 2008 2011 * * N * ti n A FF Seminole 28 41.11 81 13.74 _ Howard Aye 04 80 2011 2011 * * Y * f — C SE018 G�D U. (41 D 21S 31E f'G- 3 1 1 " C. * * Y A ,r 0.86 �� SE031 Flar' Ave �= 81 13.70 21S a::¢) 04 are i 2002 2011 * * - * * 0.59 E SE045 Seminole 28 42.05 81 13.22 20S k'd0'4d QT 33 t 2011 i; Ames `SI * * T * 42b 0.74 F s Seminole ti 81 14.01 21S zt W 37 80 2011 2011 * 1 Y * 419. 0.97 G �y Seminole 28 41.45 W nter -_3P O.� m �#� D � 80 2012 2012 * * Y * 1.89 H SE091 Seminole 28 41.00 81 12.69 i 21S i 3 1 E i 10 i 80 i 2013 i 20131 * 1 - mom * Y 10.65 w 4 � t Oviedo couh y � y Clerk St r,n VJS -131 fG b r • Map data 02014 Google Bald Eagle Nest Data Search Results: Results per page: All v Let - ter Nest ID County Town- Latitude Longitude ship Ran- ge Sec- tion Gaz Page Last Known Active Last Sur- veyed Act 9 Act 10 Act 11 Act 12 Act 13 Dist. (Mi) A SE003 Seminole 28 41.72 81 14.87 21S 31E 37 80 2008 2011 * * N * * 1.79 6 SE004 Seminole 28 41.11 81 13.74 21S 31E 04 80 2011 2011 * * Y * * 0.71 C SE018 Seminole 28 41.62 81 12.31 21S 31E 03 80 2011 2011 * * Y * * 0.86 D SE031 Seminole 28 41.50 81 13.70 21S 31E 04 80 2002 2011 * * - * * 0.59 E SE045 Seminole 28 42.05 81 13.22 20S 31E 33 80 2011 2011 * * Y * * 0.74 F SE066 Seminole 28 41.75 81 14.01 21S 31E 37 80 2011 2011 * * Y * * 0.97 G SE090 Seminole 28 41.45 81 11.25 21S 31E 02 80 2012 2012 - * * Y * 1.89 H SE091 Seminole 28 41.00 81 12.69 i 21S i 3 1 E i 10 i 80 i 2013 i 20131 * 1 - * * Y 10.65 "Y" denotes an active nest "U" denotes a nest that was visited but status was undetermined "N" denotes an inactive nest " *" denotes a nest that was not surveyed -" denotes an unobserved nest SR 434 SUBDIVISION Project W 14 -102 November, 2014 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS SEMINOLE COUNTY, FL Prepared by: TA&C�� Traffic & Mobility Consultants 1507 S. Hiawassee Road, Suite 212 Orlando, Florida 32835 www.trafficmobility.com (407) 531 -5332 Prepared for: MadiChristo Land Holdings LLC 1520 Whitstable Court Lake Mary, FL 32746 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This traffic analysis was conducted to assess the impact of the proposed SR 434 Subdivision development located on the north side of SR 434 east of Palm Drive in Seminole County, Florida. The proposed residential development comprises fifty -one (51) single family units. The study included a determination of project trip generation, review of existing and projected roadway and intersection capacity and a review of turn lane treatments. The results of the traffic analysis are summarized as follows: • The proposed development will generate 565 daily trips of which 57 trips will occur during the PM peak hour. • An analysis of roadway segment capacity indicates that the SR 434 between SR 417 and SR 426/CR 419 is currently deficient and will continue to be deficient at project buildout. This section of SR 434, which travels through the City of Oviedo, is backlogged and has been constrained as a 2 -lane facility. It was noted that the project will consume less than 2% of the capacity and will not significantly impact volumes or operations. • An analysis of the project driveway on SR 434 indicates that the access should be provide two egress lanes (left turn lane and right turn lane) to operate efficiently and with minimized delay. • An exclusive eastbound left turn deceleration lane of 235 feet is warranted on SR 434 at the project driveway. SR 434 Subdivision TWL"" Project Ns 14 -102 Executive Summary Traffic S Mobility Consultants PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that I am a Professional Engineer properly registered in the State of Florida practicing with Traffic & Mobility Consultants, LLC, a corporation authorized to operate as an engineering business, CA- 30024, by the State of Florida Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Professional Engineers, and that I have prepared or approved the evaluations, findings, opinions, conclusions, or technical advice attached hereto for: PROJECT: SR 434 Subdivision LOCATION: Seminole County, Florida CLIENT: MadiChristo Land Holdings LLC I hereby acknowledge that the procedures and references used to develop the results contained in these computations are standard to the professional practice of Transportation Engineering as applied through professional judgment and experience. NAME: Mohammed Abdallah P. E. No.: Florida P.E. No. 56169 DATE: November 10, 2014 SIGNATURE: TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................. ..............................1 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS .................................................. ..............................3 2.1 Segment Analysis ............................................................................. ..............................3 3.0 PROJECT TRAFFIC ............................................................................ ..............................4 3.1 Trip Generation ................................................................................. ..............................4 3.2 Trip Distribution / Assignment ............................................................. ..............................4 4.0 PROJECTED CONDITIONS ANALYSIS ............................................ ..............................5 4.1 Segment Analysis ............................................................................. ..............................5 4.2 Access Analysis ................................................................................ ..............................6 5.1 Turn Lane Analysis ........................................................................... ..............................8 6.0 STUDY CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................... ..............................9 APPENDICES................................................................................................ .............................10 Appendix A Proposed Site Plan Appendix B Traffic Data Appendix C Trip Generation Information Appendix D Analysis Worksheet Appendix E Turn Lane Analysis Worksheet LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Existing Roadway Capacity Analysis .............................................. ............................... 3 Table 2 Trip Generation Analysis .................................................................. ..............................4 Table 3 Projected Roadway Capacity Analysis ............................................ ..............................5 Table 4 Projected Intersection Capacity Analysis ......................................... ..............................6 LIST OF FIGURES Figure1 Site Location Map ............................................................................ ..............................2 Figure 2 Projected Traffic Volumes — PM Peak Hour .................................... ..............................7 SR 434 Subdivison Project Ns 14 -102 Table of Contents i Traffic 8 Mobility Consultants 1.0 INTRODUCTION This traffic analysis was conducted to assess the impact of the proposed SR 434 Subdivision development located on the north side of SR 434 east of Palm Drive in Seminole County, Florida. The proposed residential development comprises fifty -one (51) single family units. Figure 1 depicts the site location and the surrounding transportation network. Access to the site will be provided via a full access driveway connection onto SR 434. A proposed site plan is included in Appendix A. The analysis was conducted based on typical Seminole County Traffic Analysis requirements. There are no major intersections within 0.25 miles of the project access driveway onto SR 434. The study facilities considered in the analysis are: Study Intersection • SR 434 and Site Access Driveway Study Segments • SR 434 o S3470: Tuskawilla Road to SR 417 o S3475: SR 417 to DeLeon Avenue o S3480: DeLeon Avenue to SR 426/CR 419 TM.-Cw SR 434 Subdivision Project Ns 14 -102 Page 1 Traffic & Mobility Consultants 417 iN Nf h Ni E Na fig i7 %h [fir VY Artesia St Yorkshire- Or a Rochener Bengey Si Figure: C TM.--", SITE LOCATION MAP nsv " 1507 S. Hiawassee Rd - Ste 212 Orlando, Florida 32835 1 V ki Project: Project NO.: P: (407) 531-5332 F: (407)531 -5331 SR 434 Subdivision 14 -102 www.tra icmo i rty.com Nor io scare 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS Existing conditions in the vicinity of the site were analyzed to establish a baseline for the traffic conditions prevailing in the vicinity of the proposed development. The analysis included a review of existing roadway segment capacity and an analysis of the intersection operations at the study intersection. 2.1 Segment Analysis Existing roadway conditions were analyzed by comparing the existing traffic volumes on the roadway segments within a 1 -mile study area to the service volumes at the adopted Level of Service (LOS) standard for the roadway segments as documented in the Seminole County Roadway Concurrency Information dated September 3rd, 2014 (see Appendix B). The daily roadway segment analysis is summarized in Table 1. The analysis indicates that the study segments along SR 434 between SR 417 and SR 426/CR 419 are currently deficient. This backlogged section of SR 434 travels through the City of Oviedo and has been constrained as a 2 -lane facility. Table 1 Existing Roadway Capacity Analysis TM.-Cw SR 434 Subdivision Project Ns 14 -102 Page 3 Traffic & Mobility Consultants 3.0 PROJECT TRAFFIC To estimate the project traffic on the surrounding roadway network, a review of the project trip generation and trip distribution was conducted as documented in the following sections. 3.1 Trip Generation The trip generation analysis was conducted using information published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) in the Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition. Table 2 summarizes the resulting trip generation calculation. The ITE information sheets are included in Appendix C. Table 2 Trip Generation Analysis The calculation above reveals that the proposed development will generate 565 daily trips of which 57 trips will occur during the PM peak hour. 3.2 Trip Distribution /Assignment To assign the project trips, a distribution scenario was developed based on travel and development patterns in the vicinity of the site. The trip distribution pattern is as follows: To /From East ............................ 35% To /From West ........................... 65% TM'C-� SR 434 Subdivision Project Ns 14 -102 Page 4 Traffic 8 Mobility Consultants 4.0 PROJECTED CONDITIONS ANALYSIS An analysis of projected conditions was conducted to determine the proposed development's impact on the roadway segment capacity and to evaluate the operations of the study intersection. The total projected traffic volumes consist of existing traffic combined with committed trips and trips generated by the proposed development. 4.1 Segment Analysis Roadway segment analyses were conducted for the study roadway segments using the total projected daily traffic volumes. Projected roadway conditions were analyzed by comparing the total projected traffic volumes on the study segments to their respective service volumes at the adopted LOS standard. The projected daily analyses are summarized in Table 3. Table 3 Projected Roadway Capacity Analysis Se -1111111 9 o and Existing Comm WSegment Trip Project Total Total Adequate -A&= .&L...Jrips Distr Trips Traffic Capacity Capacity? S3470 SR 434 Tuskawilla Rd to SR 417 26,130 545 20% 113 26,788 48,000 Yes S3475 SR 434 SR 417 to DeLeon Ave 21,399 455 65% 367 22,221 18,270 No S3480 SR 434 DeLeon Ave to SR 426/CR 419 18,442 429 30% 170 19,041 18,270 No The analysis indicates that the study segments along SR 434 between SR 417 and SR 426/CR 419 will continue to be deficient. As noted previously, this section of SR 434 is backlogged and constrained as a 2 -lane facility. The project will consume less than 2% of the capacity and will not significantly impact volumes or operations. TM.-Cw SR 434 Subdivision Project Ns 14 -102 Page 5 Traffic & Mobility Consultants 4.2 Access Analysis In order to assess the operations of the study intersection, a capacity analysis was conducted using the projected traffic volumes and the HCS 2010 software. Projected peak hour volumes were determined by adding committed and project trips to existing intersection volumes. Committed daily trips provided by Seminole County were converted to the PM peak hour using the adopted K =0.096 and D =0.51 factors. The projected PM peak hour turning movement volumes are illustrated in Figure 2. The results of the analysis, summarized in Table 4, indicate that the southbound exiting left turn will experience delay due to the traffic on SR 434. In order to minimize delay and provide for efficient operations at the project access point, it is recommended that the driveway is constructed with two egress lanes, one dedicated for left turns and one for right turns. With the recommended driveway and roadway geometry, the project driveway will operate adequately within its capacity. The detailed analysis worksheet is included in Appendix D. Table 4 Projected Intersection Capacity Analysis TM.-Cw SR 434 Subdivision Project Ns 14 -102 Page 6 Traffic & Mobility Consultants Legend: XX +[XX] +(XX) =XXX Total Traffic Project Trips Committed Trips Existing Traffic 0 +(23) =23 --�' 1053+[21]=1074 > TA", C Figure: PROPOSED TRAFFIC VOLUMES - PM PEAK HOUR TrW.a 6 Mobility Consobams 1507 S. Hiawassee Rd - Ste 212 Orlando, Florida 32835 Project: Project No.: V P: (407) 531-5332 t F:(407)531 -5331 SR 434 Subdivision 14 -102 www.trafficmobility.com Nor io scare 5.1 Turn Lane Analysis The need for an exclusive eastbound left turn lane at the site access driveway on SR 434 was evaluated using guidance in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program ( NCHRP) Report 457 - Evaluating Engineering Improvements: An Engineering Study Guide. As shown below, the projected volumes exceed the NCHRP 457 left turn warrant thresholds and therefore, an eastbound left turn lane is warranted. The warrant analysis form is provided in Appendix E. 800 700 0 600 d500 400 � 300 = 200 .y r o 100 zz 0 not 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Advancing Volume (VA), vehlh A The total required storage length of an exclusive left turn lane is calculated as the sum of the queue storage and the deceleration distance. The minimum deceleration distance is based on Index 301 of the FDOT Design Standards for an operating speed of 45 mph. The queue storage area is calculated using the FDOT Plans Preparation Manual, Section 7.4.7 queue formula. The required turn lane dimension is as follows: Total Require Length = Deceleration Length + Storage Deceleration @ 45 mph = 185 feet (including 50 foot taper) Queue = 2 x 25 x Vol / 60 = 5/6 x 23 vph = 19 feet => use 50 feet (2 car length min.) Total Require Length = 185 + 50 = 235 feet TM.-Cw SR 434 Subdivision Project Ns 14 -102 Page 8 Traffic & Mobility Consultants 6.0 STUDY CONCLUSIONS This traffic analysis was conducted to assess the impact of the proposed SR 434 Subdivision development located on the north side of SR 434 east of Palm Drive in Seminole County, Florida. The proposed residential development comprises fifty -one (51) single family units. The study included a determination of project trip generation, review of existing and projected roadway and intersection capacity and a review of turn lane treatments. The results of the traffic analysis are summarized as follows: • The proposed development will generate 565 daily trips of which 57 trips will occur during the PM peak hour. • An analysis of roadway segment capacity indicates that the SR 434 between SR 417 and SR 426/CR 419 is currently deficient and will continue to be deficient at project buildout. This section of SR 434, which travels through the City of Oviedo, is backlogged and has been constrained as a 2 -lane facility. It was noted that the project will consume less than 2% of the capacity and will not significantly impact volumes or operations. • An analysis of the project driveway on SR 434 indicates that the access should be provide two egress lanes (left turn lane and right turn lane) to operate efficiently and with minimized delay. • An exclusive eastbound left turn deceleration lane of 235 feet is warranted on SR 434 at the project driveway. SR 434 Subdivision TA&C....., Project Ns 14 -102 Page 9 Traffic & Mobility Consultants APPENDICES Appendix A Proposed Site Plan AD —1 7 22 0.19 AC - - -- 21 -- - - -� -- 0.19 AC - - -� - - -- QQ 0.19 A- - - -- C 18 0.19 AC 17 0.19 AC 16 0.24 AC TJ el.,.o. �rvlaao ale TYPICAL ROW N.Y.S. TYPICAL LOT SIZE /PROPOSED BUILDING PAD serRa Ism samin lo.aawcl CORNERLOT SIZE/ BUILDING PAD FOR LOTS 7.sao sax x.15 =s97o si rysl ncl STTE DATA: aazl- n- saaausn.asas simc I—. wno use. M1.n AO) oeosEO ru -wrvo use. — N. -lncl 111STIN-1— 11 M AX n�.I3az.nC.l oRmwAisR RRV eorvR, do.e6 ne.1 +d.6.21 ORE nCCUMTE PO USizlnc�ar�ons mrsi ae vorveroa Ia�l ry a7 0.19 AC �____A 0.19 AC 50 $ 0.19 AC s o.za Ac opg �p6 �"a 33�jg w R 23 o M G x $ zo OW 4 > >: z mz In 0 a V Q �O a 'z u � z yWj O V 6I-1J I�sl. IN o Hd-,�Cl GROUP •' CONCEPT PLAN PROVIDED BY: IBI GROUP (FLORIDA), INC. j FOR [!FORMATION REGARDING Lp THIS CONCEPT PLAN CONTACT: It RE s LUKE M. CLASSON. P.E. ,r0 OFFICE: 407 -660 -2120 % 43 T 0 AC -26 — -J RY POND MAC � � 44 0.23 AC - -- 45 42 — 00 -19 AC 0.21 AC as \ 0.19 AC - - -� a7 0.19 AC �____A 0.19 AC 50 $ 0.19 AC s o.za Ac opg �p6 �"a 33�jg w R 23 o M G x $ zo OW 4 > >: z mz In 0 a V Q �O a 'z u � z yWj O V 6I-1J I�sl. IN o Hd-,�Cl GROUP •' CONCEPT PLAN PROVIDED BY: IBI GROUP (FLORIDA), INC. j FOR [!FORMATION REGARDING Lp THIS CONCEPT PLAN CONTACT: It RE s LUKE M. CLASSON. P.E. ,r0 OFFICE: 407 -660 -2120 Appendix E Traffic Data RKEY Roadway Name From To S3435 S.R. 434 Raymond Ave 1 -4 East Ramp Current Traffic Count 49.138 Roadway Link Capacity 48,000 Committed Trips 0 Net Available Capacity -1.138 S3440 S.R. 434 Palm Springs Dr Raymond Ave Current Traffic Count 45,620 Roadway Link Capacity 60.000 Committed Trips 0 Net Available Capacity 14.380 S3445 S.R. 434 C.R. 427 Palm Springs Dr Current Traffic Count 46,660 Roadway Link Capacity 48.000 Committed Trips 0 Net Available Capacity 1,340 S3450 S.R. 434 U.S. 17 -92 C.R. 427 Current Traffic Count 37.483 Roadway Link Capacity 48,000 Committed Trips 42 Net Available Capacity 10,475 S3455 S.R. 434 Moss Rd U.S. 17 -92 Current Traffic Count 35,370 Roadway Link Capacity 48,000 Committed Trips 480 Net Available Capacity 12,150 S3460 S.R. 434 S.R. 419 Moss Rd Current Traffic Count 27,726 Roadway Link Capacity 48.000 Committed Trips 0 Net Available Capacity 20.274 S3465 S.R. 434 Tuskawilla Rd S.R. 419 Current Traffic Count 36,952 Roadway Link Capacity 48,000 Committed Trips 508 Net Available Capacity 10,540 S3470 S.R. 434 S.R. 417 Tuskawilla Rd Current Traffic Count 26.130 Roadway Link Capacity 48.000 Committed Trips 545 Net Available Capacity 21,325 S3475 S.R. 434 DeLeon Ave S.R. 417 Current Traffic Count 21.399 Roadway Link Capacity 18.270 Committed Trips 455 Net Available Capacity -3.584 Wednesday, September 03, 2014 Paqe 21 of 29 This information has been provided by Shad M. Smith, P.E. at Seminole County Engineering and is current information as of the above referenced date. RKEY Roadway Name From To S3480 S.R. 434 S.R. 426/C.R. 419 DeLeon Ave Current Traffic Count 18.442 Roadway Link Capacity 18.270 Committed Trips 429 Net Available Capacity -601 S3485 S.R. 434 Mitchell Hammock S.R. 426/C.R. 419 Current Traffic Count 15,826 Roadway Link Capacity 18,270 Committed Trips 0 Net Available Capacity 2.444 S3490 S.R. 434 Chapman Rd Mitchell Hammock Current Traffic Count 32.268 Roadway Link Capacity 60.000 Committed Trips 1.274 Net Available Capacity 26,458 S3495 S.R. 434 Orange County Line Chapman Rd Current Traffic Count 37.944 Roadway Link Capacity 60.000 Committed Trips 2.769 Net Available Capacity 19.287 S3600 S.R. 436 Hunt Club Blvd Orange County Line Current Traffic Count 51,519 Roadway Link Capacity 60.000 Committed Trips 2.581 Net Available Capacity 5.900 S3610 S.R. 436 Bear Lake Rd Hunt Club Blvd Current Traffic Count 56,029 Roadway Link Capacity 60.000 Committed Trips 1,621 Net Available Capacity 2,350 S3615 S.R. 436 S.R. 434 Bear Lake Rd Current Traffic Count 72,160 Roadway Link Capacity 60,000 Committed Trips 1.377 Net Available Capacity - 13.537 S3620 S.R. 436 Montgomery Rd S.R. 434 Current Traffic Count 61.233 Roadway Link Capacity 64.825 Committed Trips 0 Net Available Capacity 3.592 S3625 S.R. 436 Wymore /Douglas Rd Montgomery Rd Current Traffic Count 63.132 Roadway Link Capacity 64.720 Committed Trips 0 Net Available Capacity 1,588 Wednesday, September 03, 2014 Paqe 22 of 23 This information has been provided by Shad M. Smith, P.E. at Seminole County Engineering and is current information as of the above referenced date. COUNTY: 77 STATION: 0006 DESCRIPTION: ON SR -434, 0.040 MI. E OF SHANGRI -LA LN (UC) START DATE: 03/14/2013 START TIME: 1400 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DIRECTION: E DIRECTION: W COMBINED TIME 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH TOTAL 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH TOTAL TOTAL --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0000 12 15 18 8 53 15 18 19 14 66 119 0100 10 11 9 8 38 15 3 8 9 35 73 0200 9 9 8 3 29 13 13 9 11 46 75 0300 5 6 8 7 26 9 4 6 12 31 57 0400 16 12 19 19 66 10 8 10 8 36 102 0500 32 39 48 80 199 15 23 38 43 119 318 0600 80 134 184 177 575 59 70 102 149 380 955 0700 263 338 338 272 1211 131 150 189 184 654 1865 0800 261 286 293 223 1063 183 166 167 161 677 1740 0900 192 166 191 149 698 156 127 105 104 492 1190 1000 129 134 132 155 550 101 113 137 116 467 1017 1100 135 146 165 152 598 100 110 97 110 417 1015 1200 139 111 137 130 517 111 117 136 130 494 1011 1300 140 161 137 179 617 124 132 146 133 535 1152 1400 148 150 198 177 673 128 167 150 172 617 1290 1500 169 168 197 184 718 158 183 184 217 742 1460 1600 195 258 248 225 926 207 212 228 256 903 1829 1700 287 234 283 249 1053 261 327 296 300 1184 2237 1800 256 196 183 161 796 272 230 213 220 935 1731 1900 134 112 129 123 498 178 151 125 141 595 1093 2000 97 94 89 94 374 133 119 121 100 473 847 2100 111 96 72 41 320 116 127 96 79 418 738 2200 41 52 45 26 164 69 49 58 45 221 385 2300 38 22 19 19 98 31 28 29 28 116 214 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 24 -HOUR TOTALS: 11860 10653 22513 PEAK VOLUME INFORMATION DIRECTION: E DIRECTION: W COMBINED DIRECTIONS HOUR VOLUME HOUR VOLUME HOUR VOLUME A.M. 700 1211 730 722 715 1915 P.M. 1700 1053 1715 1195 1700 2237 DAILY 700 1211 1715 1195 1700 2237 TRUCK PERCENTAGE 3.83 5.86 4.79 CLASSIFICATION SUMMARY DATABASE DIR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 TOTTRK TOTVOL E 89 9835 1463 130 147 40 11 90 26 10 0 0 0 0 19 454 11860 W 137 8302 1557 134 171 88 37 151 25 5 0 0 13 0 33 624 10653 GENERATED BY SPS 5.0.44P 2012 Peak Season Factor Category Report - Report Type: ALL Category: 7700 SEMINOLE COUNTYWIDE MOCF: 0.97 Week Dates SF PSCF -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 01/01/2012 - 01/07/2012 1.00 1.03 2 01/08/2012 - 01/14/2012 1.01 1.04 3 01/15/2012 - 01/21/2012 1.02 1.05 4 01/22/2012 - 01/28/2012 1.01 1.04 5 01/29/2012 - 02/04/2012 1.00 1.03 * 6 02/05/2012 - 02/11/2012 0.98 1.01 * 7 02/12/2012 - 02/18/2012 0.97 1.00 * 8 02/19/2012 - 02/25/2012 0.97 1.00 * 9 02/26/2012 - 03/03/2012 0.97 1.00 *10 03/04/2012 - 03/10/2012 0.97 1.00 *11 03/11/2012 - 03/17/2012 0.97 1.00 *12 03/18/2012 - 03/24/2012 0.97 1.00 *13 03/25/2012 - 03/31/2012 0.97 1.00 *14 04/01/2012 - 04/07/2012 0.97 1.00 *15 04/08/2012 - 04/14/2012 0.97 1.00 *16 04/15/2012 - 04/21/2012 0.98 1.01 *17 04/22/2012 - 04/28/2012 0.98 1.01 *18 04/29/2012 - 05/05/2012 0.99 1.02 19 05/06/2012 - 05/12/2012 0.99 1.02 20 05/13/2012 - 05/19/2012 1.00 1.03 21 05/20/2012 - 05/26/2012 1.01 1.04 22 05/27/2012 - 06/02/2012 1.01 1.04 23 06/03/2012 - 06/09/2012 1.02 1.05 24 06/10/2012 - 06/16/2012 1.02 1.05 25 06/17/2012 - 06/23/2012 1.02 1.05 26 06/24/2012 - 06/30/2012 1.02 1.05 27 07/01/2012 - 07/07/2012 1.02 1.05 28 07/08/2012 - 07/14/2012 1.02 1.05 29 07/15/2012 - 07/21/2012 1.02 1.05 30 07/22/2012 - 07/28/2012 1.02 1.05 31 07/29/2012 - 08/04/2012 1.02 1.05 32 08/05/2012 - 08/11/2012 1.01 1.04 33 08/12/2012 - 08/18/2012 1.01 1.04 34 08/19/2012 - 08/25/2012 1.01 1.04 35 08/26/2012 - 09/01/2012 1.01 1.04 36 09/02/2012 - 09/08/2012 1.01 1.04 37 09/09/2012 - 09/15/2012 1.01 1.04 38 09/16/2012 - 09/22/2012 1.00 1.03 39 09/23/2012 - 09/29/2012 1.00 1.03 40 09/30/2012 - 10/06/2012 0.99 1.02 41 10/07/2012 - 10/13/2012 0.98 1.01 42 10/14/2012 - 10/20/2012 0.98 1.01 43 10/21/2012 - 10/27/2012 0.98 1.01 44 10/28/2012 - 11/03/2012 0.99 1.02 45 11/04/2012 - 11/10/2012 0.99 1.02 46 11/11/2012 - 11/17/2012 1.00 1.03 47 11/18/2012 - 11/24/2012 1.00 1.03 48 11/25/2012 - 12/01/2012 1.00 1.03 49 12/02/2012 - 12/08/2012 1.00 1.03 50 12/09/2012 - 12/15/2012 1.00 1.03 51 12/16/2012 - 12/22/2012 1.01 1.04 52 12/23/2012 - 12/29/2012 1.02 1.05 53 12/30/2012 - 12/31/2012 1.02 1.05 * Peak Season Page 1 of 2 Appendix C Trip Generation Information Single - Family Detached Housing (21+x) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday Number of Studies: 355 Avg. Dumber of Dwelling Units: 198 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 9.52 4.31 21.85 3.74 Data Plot and Equation 30,000 °c X 20.000 ....................... ..:..........................•. -'. Lu r° U X j x ru C X < ' 10.000 u °' ............... ............................... X X X x X X 0 0 1090 2000 3000 X = Number of Dwelling Units Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.92 Ln(x) + 2.72 R2 = 0.95 295 Rrp Generation, 9th Edition • Institute of Transportation Engineers Single - Family Detached Housing (210) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Number of Studies: 321 Avg. (~lumber of Dwelling Units: 207 Directional Distribution: 63% entering, 37% exiting Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates 'Standard Deviation 1.00 0.42 - 2.98 1.05 Data Plot and Equation 3;000 - -- - - x W 2.000 - - - -- - - ........ v x : Q xr .............................. 1. 000 - - - - - -- ---------- --------,_... x rr rr , x x x x x° x rr x 01 - 0 1000 2000 3000 X = dumber of Dwelling Units Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.90 Ln(X) •+ 0.51 R2 T 0.91 298 Trip Generation, 9th Edition + institute of Transportation Engineers Appendix D Analysis Worksheet Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 11/10/2014 11:44 AM file: / / /C:/ Users /Vasu /AppData /Local /Temp /u2k9l 98.tmp 11/10/2014 TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst VTP Intersection SR 434 & Site Access Drwy Agency/Co. TMC LLC Jurisdiction Seminole Count Date Performed 1012012014 Analysis Year Projected Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Project Description 14102 SR 434 Subdivision East/West Street: SR 434 North /South Street: Site Access Drw Intersection Orientation: East -West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh /h) 23 1074 1206 13 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh /h 24 1130 0 0 1269 13 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 1 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh /h) 7 14 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh /h) 0 0 0 7 0 14 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 2 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh /h) 24 21 C (m) (veh /h) 541 73 V/c 0.04 0.29 95% queue length 0.14 1.04 Control Delay (s /veh) 12.0 73.1 LOS 8 F Approach Delay (s /veh) -- -- 73.1 Approach LOS -- -- F Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 11/10/2014 11:44 AM file: / / /C:/ Users /Vasu /AppData /Local /Temp /u2k9l 98.tmp 11/10/2014 Appendix E Turn Lane Analysis Worksheet Figure 2 - 5. Guideline for determining the need for a major -road left -turn bay at a two -way stop - controlled intersection. 2 -lane roadway (English) INPUT Variable Value 85th percentile speed, mph: 45 Percent of left -turns in advancing volume (VA), %: 2% Advancing volume (VA), veh /h: 1097 Opposing volume (Vo), veh /h: 1219 OUTPUT Variable I Value Limiting advancing volume (VA), veh /h: 1 328 Guidance for determining the need for a major -road left -turn bay: Left -turn treatment warranted. CALIBRATION CONSTANTS Variable Value Average time for making left -turn, s: 3.0 Critical headway, s: 5.0 Average time for left -turn vehicle to clear the advancing lane, s: 1.9 800 t j 700 600 a� 500 E 400 0 > 300 rn N 200 Q100 O 0 treatment Left -turn treatment not warranted. 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Advancing Volume (VA), veh /h Source: National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 457- Evaluating Intersection Improvements: An Engineering Study Guide COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, FL 32708 Telephone (407) 327 -1800 Fax: (407) 327 -4756 December 8, 2014 (VIA CERTIFIED MAIL) Seminole County Board of County Commissioners C/O Nicole Guillet, AICP, Seminole County Manager 1101 East 1St Street Sanford, Florida 32771 Re: Proposed Voluntary Annexation - Tax Parcel Identification Numbers: 04-21-31-300-0090-0000 04- 21 -31- 300 -009A -0000 Dear Mrs. Guillet, Pursuant to Florida Statute 171.044 (6), the City of Winter Springs is forwarding to your attention a copy of the notice of annexation for the aforementioned Seminole County Tax Identification Numbers for property herein referred to as the 'Northern Oaks Property'. The subject property is located east of the intersection of State Roads 434 and 417, within Section 04, Township 21 South, Range 31 East, Seminole County, Florida (see Exhibit A - Location Map). A future land use amendment and rezoning of the subject property to a City of Winter Springs future land use and zoning designation are proposed in conjunction with this annexation request as follows: Seminole County j Existing Future Land Use Existing Zoning Suburban Estate A -1 City of Winter Springs Proposed Future Land Use Proposed Zoning HMedium Density Residential R -1 The current schedule for the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs to consider the Annexation and Large Scale Plan Amendment is as follows: Proposed Voluntary Annexation Notification Letter Seminole County Board of County Commissioners C/O Nicole Guillet, AICP, Seminole County Manager Pg. 2 • Local Planning Agency - Wednesday, January 7, 2015 at 5:30 or soon thereafter in the Commission Chambers, Winter Springs City Hall. • First Reading (Transmittal) — Monday, January 26, 2015 at 5:15 or soon thereafter in the Commission Chambers, Winter Springs City Hall. • Second Reading (Adoption) — Monday, April 13, 2015 at 5:15 or soon thereafter on the Commission Chambers, Winter Springs City Hall. Please note that this schedule is subject to change. You will be notified of any schedule change. If there are any questions or clarifications necessary, please feel free to contact me by telephone at (407) 327 -5967 or via email at rwoodruff(a wintersprin sg fl.org. Sincerely, i Randy Woodruff, AICP Senior Planner Enclosures: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Seminole County Property Appraiser Data Exhibit C - Aerial Map CC: Randy Stevenson, AICP, ASLA, Community Development Director Anthony Garganese, City Attorney (via email) G2 I Orlando Sentinel Thursday, December 3, 2015 SE A B C D E • -•- • - -` Sanfo Attachment T" NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE CITY COMMISSION PROPOSE TO ADOPT THE FOLLOWING: ORDINANCE NO. 2015 -02 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELATING TO COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING; PROVIDING FOR ADOPTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP FOR TWO (2) PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS CONSISTING OF 18.67 TOTAL ACRES, MORE OR LESS, GENERALLY LOCATED JUST EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF STATE ROAD 434 AND STATE ROAD 417, OVIEDO; SAID PARCELS BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DEPICTED AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO; CHANGING THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION ON THE PARCEL FROM SEMINOLE COUNTY "SUBURBAN ESTATE (SE)" TO CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS "LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL'; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF PRIOR INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS; INCORPORATION INTO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; SEVERABILITY, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND LEGAL STATUS OF THE PLAN AMENDMENT. ORDINANCE NO. 2015 -03 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, CHANGING THE ZONING MAP DESIGNATION OF TWO (2) PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY TOTALING 18.67 GROSS ACRES, MORE OR LESS, GENERALLY LOCATED JUST EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF STATE ROAD 434 AND STATE ROAD 417, OVIEDO, SAID PARCEL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DEPICTED AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO; CHANGING THE ZONING DESIGNATION OF THE PARCEL FROM SEMINOLE COUNTY "AGRICULTURE (A -1)" TO WINTER SPRINGS "ONE FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT (R -1) "; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF PRIOR INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS, SEVERABILITY, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. LCXc A•ION MA1 CITY COMMISSION SECOND READING /ADOPTION PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD ON MONDAY, DECEMBER 14, 2015 AT 6:00 P.M. OR SOON THEREAFTER IN THE COMMISSION CHAMBERS LOCATED AT WINTER SPRINGS CITY HALL 1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA The proposed ordinances and complete legal description by meets and bounds may be obtained by interested parties between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, from the office of the City Clerk, located at 1126 E. SR 434, Winter Springs, Florida. For more information, call (407) 327 -1800 #227. Persons with disabilities needing assistance to participate in any of these proceedings should contact the Employee Relations Department Coordinator, 48 hours in advance-of the meeting at (407) 327 -1800, #236. This is a public hearing. Interested parties are advised that they may appear at the meeting and be heard with respect to the proposed ordinance. If you decide to appeal any recommendation or decision made by the City Commission with respect to any matter considered at this meeting, you will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purposes, you may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made upon which the appeal is based. 407-6 Dri% The A, Progra Course refine develo, Upon c course older n vehicle Registn a.m. -3:; 14, Feb.' Springs N. Edge. Springs, member nonmen Hathi focuses awarene of the be breath. 11 breathing stretchin 9 -10 a.m. Wednesc Lake Mar. Wallace C $2-$3,40 Tali Chi; Lake Mary Wallace G $1-$2,407 Zumba: cardio and benefits w Latin and ii music. T1:4° Wednesda Thursdays, Center, 9111 Lake Mary,, 4 :07- 585 -14 Bingo: 2 and Wedne! Senior Cent �ourt, Lake -ards are $1 nay purcha; :ards, 407 -5 Cardio -da exercises an lancing. Par heir own par >r older. 10:15 uesdays anc .ake Mary Se Vallace Cour 042,407-58 Line dancii it older. 12:30 'hursdays an 1.m. Fridays, L ,enior Center, :ourt, Lake M 07-585-1466 "Senior Sur eminar: Boai Ider Law Attc lammia will di ledicaid and \ enefits, asset nd estate plar ATTACHMENT "Q" CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA MINUTES CITY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING - JANUARY 26, 2015 PAGE 18 OF 25 Commissioner Carroll asked if the name "Northern Oaks" was fully confirmed. Mayor Lacey spoke for the Record and mentioned, "The new `Northern Oaks' is actually a little bit south of `Southern Oaks'." Mr. Morris remarked, "I will certainly take this up with my client." Commissioner Hovey suggested, "Winter Springs Oaks ". Commissioner Cannon asked, "Do you have reason to believe there is any encroaching easements or structures or cell phone towers..." Mr. Morris stated, "...There is a cell phone tower on the property but you'll be discussing that at the follow -up." Mr. Morris added, "We'll be back on that." REGARDING ORDINANCE 2015 -01, "MOTION TO MOVE TO SECOND READING." MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HOVEY. SECONDED BY DEPUTY MAYOR KREBS. DISCUSSION. VOTE: COMMISSIONER CANNON: AYE COMMISSIONER CARROLL: AYE COMMISSIONER HOVEY: AYE DEPUTY MAYOR KREBS: AYE COMMISSIONER RESNICK: AYE MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARINGS 502. Community Development Department - Planning Division REQUEST: The Community Development Department — Planning Division requests that the City Commission hold a Public Hearing to consider First Reading and Transmittal for both the Large -Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment and Rezoning for approximately 18.67 acres, generally located just east of the intersection of State Road 434 and State Road 417 as described within Ordinances 2015 -02 and 2015 -03. In addition, staff recommends placing the subject property within Traffic Concurrency Exemption Area (TCEA) Zone C and simultaneously updating the existing City of Winter Springs TCEA Zone Map to reflect said change. FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed Large Scale future Plan Amendment will increase the possibility of additional taxable value to the City and potentially spur the increase of future residential, commercial and/or office development activity within this particular area. A detailed Fiscal Impact Report will be performed once specific development plans are made available. COMMUNICATION EFFORTS: This Agenda Item has been electronically forwarded to the Mayor and City Commission, City Manager, City Attorney /Staff, and is available on the City's Website, LaserFiche, and the City's Server. Additionally, portions of this Agenda Item are typed verbatim on the respective Meeting Agenda which has also been electronically forwarded to the individuals noted above, and which is also available on the City's Website, LaserFiche, and the City's Server; has been sent to applicable City Staff, Media/Press Representatives who have requested Agendas /Agenda Item information, Homeowner's Associations/Representatives on file with the City, and all individuals who have requested such information. This information has also been posted outside City Hall, posted inside City Hall with additional copies available for the General Public, and posted at five (5) different locations around the City. Furthermore, this information is also available to any individual requestors. City Staff is always willing to discuss this Agenda Item or any Agenda Item with any interested individuals. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA MINUTES CITY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING - JANUARY 26, 2015 PAGE 19 OF 25 Pursuant to Florida Statutes 171.044 (6), the Seminole County Board of County Commissioners was sent via Certified Mail the notice of Annexation, Large -Scale Plan Amendment, and Rezoning for the subject parcels on December 8, 2014 (see Attachment O - Seminole County Board of County Commission Annexation Notification Letter — December 8, 2014). Adjacent property owners have been notified by U.S. mail on December 29, 2014 In addition, the properties have been posted with a large yellow sign. The proposed Ordinances were advised in the Orlando Sentinel on December 18, 2014 (see Attachment P - Advertisement, Orlando Sentinel). RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Department — Planning Division requests that the City Commission hold a Public Hearing to consider First Reading and Transmittal for both the Large -Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment and Rezoning for approximately 18.67 acres, generally located just east of the intersection of State Road 434 and State Road 417 as described within Ordinances 2015 -02 and 2015 -03. In addition, staff recommends placing the subject property within Traffic Concurrency Exemption Area (TCEA) Zone C and simultaneously updating the existing City of Winter Springs TCEA Zone Map to reflect said change. "MOTION TO READ BOTH BY `TITLE' ONLY." MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HOVEY. SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER CARROLL. DISCUSSION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH NO OBJECTIONS. Attorney Garganese read Ordinances 2015 -02 and 2015 -03, each by "Title" only. Brief comments by Attorney Garganese and Mr. Woodruff followed. Related to both Ordinances under consideration in this Agenda Item, Mayor Lacey opened the "Public Input" portion of the Agenda Item. No one spoke. Mayor Lacey closed the "Public Input" portion of the Agenda Item. Comments followed on the Traffic Concurrency Exemption. RELATED TO ORDINANCE 2015 -02, "MOTION TO MOVE TO SECOND READING." MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HOVEY. SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER CARROLL. DISCUSSION. VOTE: DEPUTY MAYOR KREBS: AYE COMMISSIONER HOVEY: AYE COMMISSIONER RESNICK: AYE COMMISSIONER CANNON: AYE COMMISSIONER CARROLL: AYE MOTION CARRIED. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA MINUTES CITY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING - JANUARY 26, 2015 PAGE 20 OF 25 REGARDING ORDINANCE 2015 -03, "MOTION TO MOVE TO SECOND READING." MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HOVEY. MAYOR LACEY NOTED, "SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER CANNON." DISCUSSION. VOTE: COMMISSIONER CANNON: AYE DEPUTY MAYOR KREBS: AYE COMMISSIONER CARROLL: AYE COMMISSIONER HOVEY: AYE COMMISSIONER RESNICK: AYE MOTION CARRIED. REGULAR AGENDA REGULAR 600. Public Works Department REQUEST: The Public Works Department requests the City Commission's approval of the Final Engineering plans for the Intersection Improvements at S.R. 434 and Tuskawilla Road (Market Square). FISCAL IMPACT: The transportation improvements are entirely federally funded through the LAP Agreement with no fiscal impact to the City. As discussed in the agenda item, non - transportation and other decorative items are ineligible for federal funding and would need to be funded by the City or deleted from the project. This agenda item is only for the approval of the Final Engineering plans and is not requesting any City funding at this time. A request for City funding will likely be part of the request for award of the construction contract agenda item scheduled in April 2015. COMMUNICATION EFFORTS: This Agenda Item has been electronically forwarded to the Mayor and City Commission, City Manager, City Attorney /Staff, and is available on the City's Website, LaserFiche, and the City's Server. Additionally, portions of this Agenda Item are typed verbatim on the respective Meeting Agenda which has also been electronically forwarded to the individuals noted above, and which is also available on the City's Website, LaserFiche, and the City's Server; has been sent to applicable City Staff, Media/Press Representatives who have requested Agendas /Agenda Item information, Homeowner's Associations/Representatives on file with the City, and all individuals who have requested such information. This information has also been posted outside City Hall, posted inside City Hall with additional copies available for the General Public, and posted at five (5) different locations around the City. Furthermore, this information is also available to any individual requestors. City Staff is always willing to discuss this Agenda Item or any Agenda Item with any interested individuals. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Commission approve the Final Engineering plans for the Intersection Improvements at S.R. 434 and Tuskawilla Road (Market Square). Mr. Fields introduced this Agenda Item for discussion and gave an overview of the Agenda Item. ATTACHMENT "R" CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA MINUTES CITY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING - DECEMBER 14, 2015 PAGE 15 OF 33 Mayor Lacey closed the "Public Input" portion of the Agenda Item. Continuing, Mayor Lacey then stated, "I would suggest if you want to contemplate postponing — to postpone it to the time certain of the January 11"', [2016] meeting of the Commission." "SO MOVED." MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HOVEY. 24 ATTORNEY GARGANESE ADDED, "POSTPONE TO THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING — OF JANUARY 11, [2016]." COMMISSIONER HOVEY AGREED. MAYOR LACEY THEN SAID, "SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER CARROLL ". DISCUSSION. VOTE: COMMISSIONER RESNICK: AYE DEPUTY MAYOR KREBS: AYE COMMISSIONER CANNON: AYE COMMISSIONER HOVEY: AYE COMMISSIONER CARROLL: AYE MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARINGS 502. Community Development Department - Planning Division REQUEST: The Community Development Department — Planning Division requests that the City Commission hold a Public Hearing to consider Second Reading and Adoption for both the Large -Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment and Rezoning for approximately 18.67 acres, generally located just east of the intersection of State Road 434 and State Road 417 as described within Ordinances 2015 -02 and 2015 -03. In addition, staff recommends placing the subject property within Traffic Concurrency Exemption Area (TCEA) Zone C and simultaneously updating the existing City of Winter Springs TCEA Zone Map to reflect said change. FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed Large Scale future Plan Amendment will increase the possibility of additional taxable value to the City and potentially spur the increase of future residential, commercial and/or office development activity within this particular area. A detailed Fiscal Impact Report will be performed once specific development plans are made available. COMMUNICATION EFFORTS: This Agenda Item has been electronically forwarded to the Mayor and City Commission, City Manager, City Attorney /Staff, and is available on the City's Website, LaserFiche, and the City's Server. Additionally, portions of this Agenda Item are typed verbatim on the respective Meeting Agenda which has also been electronically forwarded to the individuals noted above, and which is also available on the City's Website, LaserFiche, and the City's Server; has been sent to applicable City Staff, Media/Press Representatives who have requested Agendas /Agenda Item information, Homeowner's Associations/Representatives on file with the City, and all individuals who have requested such information. This information has also been posted outside City Hall, posted inside City Hall with additional copies available for the General Public, and posted at five (5) different locations around the City. Furthermore, this information is also available to any individual requestors. City Staff is always willing to discuss this Agenda Item or any Agenda Item with any interested individuals. ATTACHMENT "R" CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA MINUTES CITY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING - DECEMBER 14, 2015 PAGE 16 OF 33 ASOMM Pursuant to Florida Statutes 171.044 (6), the Seminole County Board of County Commissioners was sent via Certified Mail the notice of Annexation, Large -Scale Plan Amendment, and Rezoning for the subject parcels on December 8, 2014 (see Attachment O - Seminole County Board of County Commission Annexation Notification Letter — December 8, 2014). Adjacent property owners have been notified by U.S. mail on December 29, 2014 In addition, the properties have been posted with a large yellow sign. The proposed Ordinances were advised in the Orlando Sentinel on December 18, 2014 for the First Reading and Transmittal and again on December 3, 2015 for Second Reading and Adoption (see Attachment P - Advertisement, Orlando Sentinel). IRX616 _UT L117.199 :$]0 The Community Development Department — Planning Division requests that the City Commission hold a Public Hearing to consider Second Reading and Adoption of both the Large -Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment and Rezoning for approximately 18.67 acres, generally located just east of the intersection of State Road 434 and State Road 417 as described within Ordinances 2015 -02 and 2015 -03. In addition, staff recommends placing the subject property within Traffic Concurrency Exemption Area (TCEA) Zone C and simultaneously updating the existing City of Winter Springs TCEA Zone Map to reflect said change. Mayor Lacey referenced this Agenda Item with the previous Agenda Item and Ordinance and stated, "I assume that the recommendation from Staff would be to similarly postpone this to January 11, [2016]." Mr. Stevenson remarked, "That would be correct." "SO MOVED." MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HOVEY. SECONDED BY DEPUTY MAYOR KREBS. DISCUSSION. MAYOR LACEY ADDED, "TO POSTPONE ITEM `502' WHICH IS TWO (2) ORDINANCES UNTIL THE JANUARY 11TH, [2016] MEETING." VOTE: COMMISSIONER CANNON: AYE COMMISSIONER HOVEY: AYE COMMISSIONER CARROLL: AYE DEPUTY MAYOR KREBS: AYE COMMISSIONER RESNICK: AYE MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARINGS 503. Utility Department REQUEST: The Utility Department requests approval of Resolutions 2015 -30 and 2015 -31, adopting the Water Treatment Plant #1 Facilities Plan and Authorizing the State Revolving Loan Fund Application, respectively. FISCAL IMPACT: The SIZE loan amount is projected at $6,000,000 to cover the construction costs. The current SRF rate is 2.26% less additional reductions available for Davis/Bacon and Buy American compliance which brings the current rate projection the to the 1.2% range.