Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015 12 02 Public Hearing 503 Aesthetic Review For The Public Works Administration BuildingPLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITEM 503 December 2, 2015 Meeting Consent Information Public Hearing X Regular REQUEST: The Community Development Department —Planning Division requests the Planning & Zoning Board consider approval of the Aesthetic Review for the Public Works Administration Building located on the north side of Old Sanford Oviedo Road. SYNOPSIS: The applicant is requesting approval of the Aesthetic Review for the Public Works Administration Building. The subject property is located in the I -1 (Light Industrial) zoning district. The Final Engineering Plans were approved by the City Commission on September 25, 2005. The City Commission also approved the Aesthetic Review on April 10, 2006. The Administration Building was not a part of the aesthetic review approvals from 2006 but was part of the final engineering. CONSIDERATIONS: APPLICANT AND PROPERTY INFORMATION: • Applicant name and address and authorized representative: The City of Winter Springs, 1126 SR 434, Winter Springs, FL 32708 • Property owner's name(s): The City of Winter Springs • Property addresses: 400 Old Sanford Oviedo Road, Winter Springs, FL • Property Parcel ID number: 34- 20- 30 -5AW- 0000 -0030 • Current FLUM Designations: Public /Semi - Public • Current Zoning Designations: I -1 (Light Industrial) • Previously pproved Development permits such as conditional use, waiver, or variance (if any): Final Engineering Plans Approved by the City Commission on September 26, 2005. • Pending Code Enforcement Actions (if any): No known pending Code Enforcement actions December 2, 2015 Planning & Zoning Board Agenda, Item 503 Page 2 of 4 • City Liens (if any): No known liens APPLICABLE LAW, PUBLIC POLICY, AND EVENTS City Code of Ordinances Article X11. Minimum Community Appearance and Aesthetic Review Standards. CHRONOLOGY: September 26, 2005 — Final Engineering Plans Approved April 10, 2006 — Aesthetic Review DISCUSSION: Aesthetic Review The attached Aesthetic Review package includes all of the submittal requirements for aesthetic review as set forth in Section 9 -600 through 9 -607 and include the following: (a) a site plan; (b) elevations illustrating all sides of structures facing public streets or spaces; (c) illustrations of all walls, fences, and other accessory structures and the indication of height and their associated materials; (d) elevation of proposed exterior permanent signs or other constructed elements other than habitable space, if any; (e) illustrations of materials, texture, and colors to be used on all buildings, accessory structures, exterior signs; and (f) other architectural and engineering data as maybe required. The procedures for review and approval are set forth in Section 9 -603. The City Commission may approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove the application only after consideration of whether the following criteria have been satisfied: (1) The plans and specifications of the proposed project indicate that the setting, landscaping, proportions, materials, colors, textures, scale, unity, balance, rhythm, contrast, and simplicity are coordinated in a harmonious manner relevant to the particular proposal, surrounding area and cultural character of the community. The project is located in the 1-1 (Light Industrial) zoning district of the City. The design of the proposed administration building will include a stucco facade and a standing seam metal roof.. These materials are harmonious in character with an industrial area and the existing portion of the Public Works Compound. (2) The plans for the proposed project are in harmony with any future development which has been formally approved by the City within the surrounding area. The design of the proposed administration building is characteristic of the architecture that is provided throughout the Public Works Compound and is in harmony with the surrounding industrial area. Additionally, the elevations are consistent with the elevations that were previously approved for the Public Works Compound in 2006. (3) The plans for the proposed proj ect are not excessively similar or dissimilar to any other building, structure or sign which is either fully constructed, permitted but not fully constructed, or included on the same permit application, and facing upon the same or intersecting street within five hundred (500) feet of the proposed site, with respect to one or more of the following features of exterior design and December 2, 2015 Planning & Zoning Board Agenda, Item 503 Page 3 of 4 appearance: (A) Front or side elevations, (B) Size and arrangement of elevation facing the street, including reverse arrangement, (C) Other significant features of design such as, but not limited to: materials, roof line, hardscape improvements, and height or design elements. The proposed administration building is designed to contribute to the quality of architectural styles that currently exist in the industrial area. The proposed building utilizes a color scheme similar to the other buildings that are found within the Public Works Compound. (4) The plans for the proposed project are in harmony with, or significantly enhance, the established character of other buildings, structures or signs in the surrounding area with respect to architectural specifications and design features deemed significant based upon commonly accepted architectural principles of the local community. The proposed project enhances the character and overall aesthetics of the industrial area. (5) The proposed project is consistent and compatible with the intent and purpose of this Article, the Comprehensive Plan for Winter Springs, design criteria adopted by the city (e.g. Town Center guidelines, SR 434 design specifications) and other applicable federal state or local laws. The proposed project is consistent and compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and City Code requirements. (6) The proposed project has incorporated significant architectural enhancements such as concrete masonry units with stucco, marble, termite - resistant wood, wrought iron, brick, columns and piers, porches, arches, fountains, planting areas, display windows, and other distinctive design detailing and promoting the character of the community. The project has incorporated features such as stucco walls and complimentary stucco trim, as well as a standing seam metal roof. Expression lines are provided to help break up blank expanses on the facade. The proposed architecture is consistent with the architecture of the existing buildings that are located within the Public Works Compound. The project provides distinctive design details that promote the character of the industrial area. FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed Aesthetic Review for the Public Works Administration building is not expected to have any negative fiscal impact. COMMUNICATION EFFORTS: The Meeting Agenda and this Agenda Item have been forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Board members and are available on the City's Website, LaserFiche, and the City's Server. The Agenda has been forwarded to the Mayor and City Commission; City Manager; and City Attorney /Staff. Additionally, the Meeting Agenda has been sent to media /press representatives, all Homeowner's Associations on file with the City, all individuals who have requested Agenda information, Department Directors; and also posted outside City Hall; posted inside City Hall with additional copies available for the general public. December 2, 2015 Planning & Zoning Board Agenda, Item 503 Page 4 of 4 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning & Zoning Board forward a recommendation of approval to the City Commission for the Aesthetic Review of the Public Works Administration Building located on the north side of Old Sanford Oviedo Road. ATTACHMENTS: A. Aesthetic Review Application Package B. Approved Final Engineering Plans — September 26, 2005 C. Approved Aesthetic Review for the Public Works Compound— April 10, 2006 APPLICANT: ATTACHMENT "A" Aesthetic Review Application CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708 407 - 327 -5967 FAX:407- 327 -6695 APPLICATION FOR AESTHETIC REVIEW Last Middle MAILING ADDRESS: I/ Z 6 �a sf 5 tZ '13 L City State % /' /`/► Zip Code PHONE & EMAIL: If Applicant does NOT own the property: I ' PROPERTY OWNER: C f Y 4 W ;n4e r S7er / "''1 s' Last First Middle MAILING ADDRESS: ( 11a6 5- 9 Al 31 City State G r Z' Cod Code PHONE & EMAIL: L/0 7 - 2 - ! 1Qt]U �C�o e ` C k 7 Q W.113e ' F? rr 451C `i') This request is for the property described below: 0 PROJECT NAME: 1 tAO /c- t4lork5 /9r�M�n,SfrS ion ��Glol LOCATION OR ADDRESS: I/00 Q /d DATE of Approval for FINAL ENGINEERING: APPLICANTS are advised that if, they decide to appeal any decisions made at the meetings or hearings with respect to any matter considered at the meetings or hearings, they will need a record of the proceedings and, for such purposes, they will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, at their cost, which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based, per 286.0105, Florida Statutes. March 2006 THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE TO BE SUPPLIED WITH THIS APPLICATION (Sec 9 -605): )t SITE PLAN; U BUILDING ELEVATIONS (B &W) illustrating all sides of structures; SL COLOR RENDERING illustrating street view with landscaping at time of planting; NA ❑ ILLUSTRATIONS of all WALLS, FENCES, AND OTHER ACCESSORY STRUCTURES and indication of their height and the materials proposed for their construction; IvA ❑ SIGNAGE ELEVATIONS of proposed exterior permanent signs, outdoor advertising or other constructed elements other than habitable space, if any; IR IDENTIFICATION of MATERIALS, TEXTURES, AND COLORS (include paint chips) to be used on all buildings, accessory structures, exterior signs, and other constructed elements; ® OTHER architectural and engineering data as may be requested to clarify the application. ® Notarized AUTHORIZATION of the Applicant t7 SUBMITTED DRAWINGS: Initial Submittal: One (1) complete 11x17 packet for compliance review, then For Staff review: Twelve (12) 11x17 copies, PLUS One (1) pdf electronic copy, then For City Commission: Twenty-one (2 1) 11x17 copies, PLUS One (1) pdf electronic copy. W A ❑ APPLICATION FEE (see below): FEES are as SHOWN BELOW plus any ACTUAL COSTS incurred for the City's REIMBURSEMENT for TECHNICAL and/or PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (including the City Attorney) which may be required in connection with this Application for Aesthetic Review (as documented based on accounting submitted to the City), due and payable prior to the City's issuing of a building permit. ❑ MINOR (site LESS than 2 acres) $ 300 ❑ MAJOR (site GREATER than 2 acres) $ 600 ❑ MODIFICATION OF PREVIOUSLY APPROVED AESTHETIC REVIEW $ 300 TOTAL DUE DURATION OF APPROVAL: Approvals for Aesthetic Review shall expire eighteen (18) months from the date the City Commission renders its approval at a public meeting if the Applicant fails to obtain a building permit during that time. Reasonable extensions may be granted by the Commission upon good cause by the Applicant, provided substantial changes have not occured in the surrounding area that would make the prior approval inconsistent with the criteria set forth in Section 9-603. INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT: CONDUCT OF THE PUBLIC HEARING (CODE OF ORDINANCES, SECTION 9 -603. (C)): During the Public Hearing, the APPLICANT may be present in person or by counsel, and the APPLICANT has the right to present evidence in support of the application and cross- examine adverse witnesses whose testimony is offered at the hearing. 2 March 2006 The following CRITERIA will be considered by the City Commission: (1) The PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS of the proposed project indicate that the setting, landscaping, proportions, materials, colors, texture, scale, unity, balance, rhythm, contrast, and simplicity are coordinated in a harmonious manner relevant to the particular proposal, surrounding area and cultural character of the community. (2) The PLANS for the proposed project are in harmony with any future development which has been formally approved by the City within the surrounding area. (3) The PLANS for the proposed project are not excessively similar or dissimilar to any other building, structure or sign which is either fully constructed, permitted but not fully constructed, or included on the same permit application, and facing upon the same or intersecting street within five hundred (500) feet of the proposed site, with respect to one or more of the following features of exterior design and appearance: a. Front or side elevations; b. Size and arrangement of elevation facing the street, including reverse arrangement; or c. Other significant features of design such as, but not limited to: materials, roof line, hardscape improvements, and height or design elements_ (4) The PLANS for the proposed project are in harmony with, or significantly enhance, the established character of other buildings, structures or signs in the surrounding area with respect to architectural specifications and design features deemed significant based upon commonly accepted architectural principles of the local community. (5) The PROPOSED PROJECT is consistent and compatible with the intent and purpose of this article, the Comprehensive Plan for Winter Springs, design criteria adopted by the City (e.g. Town Center guidelines, SR 434 design specifications) and other applicable federal, state or local laws_ (6) The PROPOSED PROJECT has incorporated significant architectural enhancements such as concrete masonry units with stucco, marble, termite- resistant wood, wrought iron, brick, columns and piers, porches, arches, fountains, planting areas, display windows, and other distinctive design detailing and promoting the character of the community. March 2006 By submitting this application you hereby grant temporary right of entry for city officials to enter upon the subject property for purposes of evaluating this application. APPLICANT'S AUTHORIZATION: I desire to make Application for Aesthetic Review for the aforementioned project and have read and agree to the terms contained herein: Signature of Applicant %o0t8 III lttttt,i "c TWA 41 �errrA� Sworn to and subscribed before me this r �� O'd• °�c�te�itss�L�� . '1,y day of 0—L5 Notary Public My Commission expires: r� Personally Known 42- L� --I RPF0 6 0 Produced Identification: 's °'• °mss' ~'ci;,•••., °• ° °` `fi� •�� (Type) _ Did take an Oath td Not take and Oath �ir'attttct &t:f' FOR USE WHEN APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: do hereby with my notarized signature allow to proceed with Site Planning on my property_ The property is identified as: Tax Parcel Number(s) Located at and as further identified on the Metes and Bounds description provided with this Application. Signature of Owner(s) Signature of Owner(s) Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of 20 Personally Known Produced Identification: (Type) Did take an Oath Did Not take and Oath Notary Public My Commission expires: 4 Much 2006 N u ni NQWa° E b a d �-" �qz= p m -_ czI re o W J N 0 Q Q Q � 'es o reedeor n n pN a:a lrmqeop s r a b "� .e ROld '0D00��SON� � � � INO � dS 2 3 IM '3N tl N.. VW0 w J _ D I2 V H tlO N o sm'o A niovdSMOMonsnd SON RdS 231NIM i0 A10 rtq g„aad v Q \�14 pdr p9 PNp pq a 6 p R9 ump SNOUVA3�32JON31X3 "D 00 LU W o U) 0 LU O I I I I I I � Q eoeeonn pN qor rte sl„aa arep pN s«® "qeo val fold S`JNR1dS 2131NIM 3Ntll NtlW121tlH ..Aniovd SMIOM onend.. o Q alms Q edr rtq ga„o�aad 0 pdr p9 PaNSa4p 's nN W tlla A 2 =� ki ab ^�% S`JN R1dS 2131NIM d0 ALl0 v\ V SNOUVA3�3 2JON31X3 Q ° " Q Aq pa 5,i 3 I I I I I I R w LU w J , LU o 2 Qa Oa LU z � Q eoeeonn pN qor Q srm�o :arep Q alms Q edr rtq ga„o�aad 0 pdr p9 PaNSa4p 's R9 umeip Colors to be utilized for the buildings at the Public Works Site Standing Seam Metal Roof- Metal Wall Panels- Signature 300 Snow White Sigtta+ttt;e ;99,4b??tqftd Stucco Wall Area (top)- SW 6155 Rice Grain (identical to metal color Almond) Stucco Trim (top & bottom)- SW 7070 Site White Stucco Trim (center of band)- SW 6108 Latte Stucco Wall Area (base)- SW 7017 Dorian Gray BLDG. 2 REAR ELEV. PAINTED STUCCO PAINTED STUCCO (BANDING) (BANDING) I S E 51. 115! SW 6108 Latte PAINTED STUCCO (BOTTOM) SHERMN 1EWRYS c � ]019 AY SW 7017 Dorian Gray PAINTED STUCCO STANDING SEAM (TOP) METAL ROOF 'lt1ER� �NIS Ev�5.9S du1WC Srt 6155 SNOM' Wa'r ETAI, WALL PAtiEL �JiOb� E �s�� ne s�naa a Pm �bobb nn s«p oNgoP ' VON Old 'SON R1dS 2131NM "021003N00210dNtlS 01000V . nioVd SMOM mend.. SJNNdS2aNIMJOA10 Oo o s NHId 311S ltfdnio311H0HV P a „PPaPtl��a 9 o,o o,o o,o wax a N o� ° Uz z p p o ° z °a z p9 � � ❑ [ Q o zo o a o g oz Q 9 �m=� � ° z �w Z_ ° Q w Y z w z owo w U N�aaH Q N ID INIIVI Moa3d�, < o -- LLJ U� El iI N El oi LL �� I - - - -- - —� O C,4 l o M `i LL o I o zZ) I o o — — \LL a� I ddd <<d dd o W m i . ............�.�oor,��� + ,+t IW_� r� i or s + F Alp y' a 6 r 4 • r } CITY COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM 502 September 26, 2005 Meeting ATTACHMENT "B" Approved Final Engineering Plans Consent Information Public Hearin Regular X 2 MGR. /Dept. 1 REQUEST: The Public Works Department requests the City Commission consider and approve the proposed final engineering plans for the City's Utility/Public Works Compound, PURPOSE: The purpose of this agenda item is to recommend approval for the proposed final engineering plans for the City's new Utility/Public Works Compound and associated infrastructure on 13.17 acres on the north side of Old Sanford Oviedo Road. APPLICABLE CITY CODES: Section 9 -71. When final development plan is to be filed; extension. Section 9 -72. Processing of final plans. Section 9 -73. Form and contents of final development plans. Section 9 -74. Action on final development plan; expiration of approval. PROJECT SUMMARY: The project consists of the construction of a 6,800 sf Utility / Public Works Administration Building, a 7,400 sf Garage Building, a 7,330 sf Yard Building, and two storage structures on an unimproved 13.17 acre site. Additional storage buildings are planed for and shown but will be constructed in the future as funds become available. September 26, 2005 Regular Item 502 Page 2 CHRONOLOGY: ➢ January 12, 2004 — The City Commission authorized the architectural / design services for the proposed facilities. ➢ January 10, 2005 — The concept plan for the site was approved by the City Commission. ➢ September 6, 2005 — The final engineering plans were approved by the Planning & Zoning Board. CONSIDERATIONS: ➢ The site is located on ten (10) City -owned parcels having a combined land area of 13.17 acres. Staff is in the process of finalizing the unity of title for the 10 parcels. ➢ The site is zoned as I -1 — Light Industrial District. The proposed land use is "public and governmental services" and is a permitted land use in accordance with Section 20 -259 of the City Code. ➢ Access to and from the development is provided at two driveways off of Old Sanford/Oviedo Road. Old Sanford /Oviedo road connects with Wade Street to the east, which connects to S.R. 419 west of S.R. 434. ➢ A traffic study has been prepared for the site. The project is estimated to generate a daily traffic volume of 395 vehicles per day, with 31 AM peak hour trips and 40 PM peak hour trips. The traffic study indicates that no additional off -site traffic improvements are necessary to maintain the existing levels of service at the affected intersections. ➢ The site provides 126 surface parking spaces, which is sufficient for the approximately 50 employees who will work onsite, visitor parking, and excess parking for City fleet vehicles. ➢ The onsite stormwater management system routes surface runoff to two onsite wet detention ponds. Both ponds have outfalls to the onsite wetlands. ➢ Wetlands mitigation is required for this site. At the May 23, 2005 City Commission meeting, the Commission authorized the purchase of an eight -acre conservation easement for $69,000 for the purpose of mitigation of wetlands that will be impacted as part of the construction. This purchase of was needed to offset the 0.81 acres of existing wetlands to be filled and the other 0.02 acres of wetlands that will be impacted during construction. The onsite wetlands to be mitigated are isolated pockets with low value. ➢ The Utility / Public Works Compound will connect to City potable water and sanitary sewer. The City has adequate capacity for both. September 26, 2005 Regular Item 502 Page 3 A site landscaping plan is being prepared by Staff and is not included in the final engineering plans. The site landscaping will emphasize native plant species and will minimize the irrigation demand. The landscaping plan will be brought to the City Commission for approval when completed. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Commission approve the final engineering plans. ATTACHMENTS: A. Drawings — "Public Works Compound Civil Construction Plans" by Cycorp IMPLEMENTATION: Staff is projecting to bid the project in October, open bids in November, and bring a bid award recommendation to the City Commission in December. CITY COMMISSION ACTION: ED 1--1 M-1 O M--1 h—I � 0 h—I q �1 H "I i H m o w � 0 rn U x a IL a z H Z Q H N Z O 0 133HS a3AOO epuold 'sBuudg jelulM _ T ,gllloed sAjoM oilQnd s6u. s Jolulm to Alin $ LLw.w w waadamu rLLLL,LLLL� � ;00000m w000000 ef: =ef� wµw -- �.r..mmmeeeWWWWWW����� � ��aa�nmmS "s a w LLLLd� a � LLa o a��ao oo n zzz 8H ° a a UaIA X66° ; �o ; LLw3owQa� mM. z, Q E v W n n mo�C ®_ W0 cc A Vs iiii, LL cc CL 0 PE IL I 1 a m 1 1-- W 2 a f all C) co CO) F- z 0 z LL Ch 4 >- -. --, 6 i LU CL > .1c) MR. Szo -Z 16 > LU cc IL z CO) n 0 U) 0 a L) z KO w ! Is 011S. 4 z z g, zw w .-iL w." C) n 0, CO) CL .,a z . 6 L Z�. Z 0 z Lu 0 0 i�:—, 2 W> w H I . , z�. Lu 0 0 Lz � m m Z 29z > - 8-20 H, I > i5 Qe -mm. k 0. G WO— e -Z Lt Om z Lu ZU) .5 j oc m z (L U) U) LLI cc m 4 Ej ZF3 z LU Lu Lu M LU Q �- :) > Z Lu LU 0 0 LU> P 0 NMI Ind PL z j2 51. S cc cc v E. LU a Q6 Z Q 1z 9. LU -z oNA INS" cc ui QQa o N Cc LU cc ca Lu Z tu cc j Ro� Coco WWI 9z CC 0: Lu LL 9 oz 0 5. cc L) z 0 0-, H 51 "s ,-R F, F, w z z z . 12 F. Q ry e w, . U z . 0 w. 0 w. z-. LU w w 1. 1z 1z zo :5 S 1z So -w w-w o o o L . U 1. z 8. .2 z' 1. § Lu > 2 P'. z w. 1. -9(8,9 Z3 Us wb A z. 0 < n5 0 w z R. 5. �w z Amm 2 V CL SIR z I w N �z w. 5 z 1 1.3 a sz2 C, z 0 -z --,'z 0-� Z26 P o 5 0 0 < LL, —J (a '. w 0 w 0 am O .E 8.9 LU 0 LLJ < L, CL iL 'L a1z 00 , fft 2 e S2 g 0 !. �im w 0 w x X, m w R q CL CL CL LU Lu m CL (a 0 t (0) LL Ca d 7 l CL wp0hi Id no Uh 1 ca LU 1 1L 11001 alu 11111 Hu 11 13 HIM! I K 'Omni no 111 11MR! 00, min HN all in 1 no las UIH 1w 1 1 L 1 §LL Q oil m Run 0 H Hui ill !!!!!!oi1 Q 0 poll h111101 I incise U111111LIOL1111, E'um "I H lwE gin RION IBM In MIN HUI Ulu M, 4S mpg 'WHOOM IM! - IM! H MUNI I i I IN Elm H N WIN 111 I 1 i1i N tL WRI in 1 "i 1181 nil B3. L i HI -V OIR d of 0 Room E ill ill 11 11R 11 . 11 Ill 11. Igg 30. 2 1 111111 Nil so 1 11 1 - I - - 1 11010 IN ill 1 N !HUI 1 U IN imil 101 1 in Nil 11 11 R 11110 211 ill 11 Nil Neill I all Ill 111; 1 Ulm! 1 1" 11 1 ;1 11 memo pl-a ?10 MIN 1 in mug! 11 1 11 511 HIER. 1 Mump! Ill in ME Fd tool k� 1 H 11 pill I i R H nil la. Ruh H 11 Ila, 01111 1111111 mill I-El WE lob U1 on; 111 11 I OMNI 1 NUMNINIM 11H $' GE H R! 11H Ruin! ion "I 1, 0 H- a Ulu sun MUM, pop im,mim 1§1 a Hun H 11, NIMI ONE M1 a 1 " 11MI 1 nil 111M RUH 11 .0, 1 L 'M LL 1 Atli ill Ulu I I P1111 n 10 Ulu m Z CC C m J Z o ®-♦ cc = =W w cc iiJJ WY YY �W� ® _I Q Q m 1 z O I ~ W z NW _ z � 3Nr, ua3doaa r coow a a ua m W o= V w 4 6 IL m w� W z w Q U zU I l y �~ 2 i SF C� ¢ W y \ ~z W Wz W2 U W fq W wM J 44 3Q N ��. 3z y - W ' ~ ; F F3 I ~ � + 4 k. s oZ .r f lW I e ^ �n i _ raw > q C s ^6 _ 1 ✓ 0 t ai— y i o cp ' o — v o O m W V y N ==W aLLm y ,� O z m W ^ cc N _w erg w W RuJ 0 � Q W ; z o , N �o W `j � W �_ �QCg �S-�" � x v I► � -40 i [►/� r u5 NYt� -ii mY m� vY Z LA o '° V 0 a - C. ° .- Q - U) FO, cc co Z I `w.� � _ � i°n~iu �.,�.+• � � it 2 0 - Z ,ffe BERN.,- 7a=LLwo I. =�°LL _ p w loS.o LL I. FT a a ¢ , S d z ° s a Q e t � ° 4 R. �\ M ^mow (7 yo Z .'.� 1/ ih .• $ /" -.yak' Sa W � I I na a I a y c� ";o vn a :lAs o K 4 —1-1 ^\ ca \ a ' � c \1 � 1 LL, 3 W U) FO, cc co Z I `w.� � _ � i°n~iu �.,�.+• � � it 2 0 - Z ,ffe BERN.,- 7a=LLwo I. =�°LL _ p w loS.o LL I. FT a a ¢ , S d z ° s a Q e t � ° 4 R. �\ M ^mow (7 yo Z .'.� 1/ ih .• $ /" -.yak' Sa W � I I na a I a y c� ";o vn a :lAs o K 4 —1-1 ^\ ca \ a ' � c \1 � 1 � ko o~"�O IM ig� LLimNyaj =�• 1 { AJ,00L . y1 4 �o w mZ N. owo L2 m~ JWJO� � ° OO�w �wW Z�m n -¢�' ��p �"�^ m r �� �• _ �ro {W9 po �� ',, '. 0 w i pwww m o k ry4� Q o��WO w k -4G ago 2 :5 �, 0 0 O °w¢¢ y� z w w� �w �'�ow `-tea o�z f ��s;j � "" � �... __ - � I � z wo0¢=w �� 2i °� °" � � z I .nit ✓ � � -_ r OoQ�wWi ° z €mss C�¢ mom" ��a QwwW °gym I .34g RH ly Oz is �w t� I i W O z t � I s o c� IT All SM � 1 W 7 M ® � W Lu m � a k U °oo� \ r ® � p o WW(� = :;W mn a ti. O Z O► Q ► Q Q J N N cc = ._ ORS 0 D �� � ko o~"�O IM ig� LLimNyaj =�• 1 { AJ,00L . y1 4 �o w mZ N. owo L2 m~ JWJO� � ° OO�w �wW Z�m n -¢�' ��p �"�^ m r �� �• _ �ro {W9 po �� ',, '. 0 w i pwww m o k ry4� Q o��WO w k -4G ago 2 :5 �, 0 0 O °w¢¢ y� z w w� �w �'�ow `-tea o�z f ��s;j � "" � �... __ - � I � z wo0¢=w �� 2i °� °" � � z I .nit ✓ � � -_ r OoQ�wWi ° z €mss C�¢ mom" ��a QwwW °gym I .34g RH ly Oz is �w t� I i W O z t � I s o c� IT All SM � 1 It W LuJ �� W ca a p co �~ / I LL�U ENO Q 3I NW n 5° Ow 20u a c� n ° i o N co W m 4�� 2 z f V J WU ° Z tip I TL II :MEG rr Cc 2M M 2 �'j �~ / I LL�U ENO Q 3I NW n 5° Ow 20u a c� n ° F i m 4�� 2 z f V J WU ° Z tip I oWe II Z=��a $'o - z�� °~� M "h F O e W z 2 ., F 4, WNH ' W :MEG rr Cc 2M M 2 c� °z z m Zo�z � '^'°�`�I r<ti 4Y ¢jqG m�GCZ gOCeQ � . n h a h b n m m .� .� .� •� .� .� y� '0. � 1 N -gO i Co r Q 21 of iI I tp �'j �~ / I LL�U ENO Q 3I NW n 5° Ow 20u a c� n ° m 4�� 2 z f V J WU ° Z I e LL I I S II AN - z�� °~� e W c� °z z m Zo�z � '^'°�`�I r<ti 4Y ¢jqG m�GCZ gOCeQ � . n h a h b n m m .� .� .� •� .� .� y� '0. � 1 N -gO i Co r Q 21 of iI I tp I \ I I I I _ I g� I I K �'j �~ / I LL�U ENO Q 3I NW n 5° Ow 20u a c� n ° m 4�� = I I I G Q�aio ° I J o I m °OOiB 0 e LL I I S II I \ I I I I _ I g� I I K 1 I 7 �'j �~ / I LL�U ENO Q 3I NW n 5° Ow 20u a c� n ° m 4�� J �u3 1 I 7 �a J a 1-4 d �LLw — - �V� oo� ZSc4 40 IL - 3 _� Q 1A Q =ao 0 w � W c w- z F ra., \ � m Lu Lu In m > v o z <C a _ _ U Rg O \ � W W � � a wr I w c( - �� z 'r �u = - - - �;. �III�IPI 1 r n e o N W W a s a k o J % _ ao, a 4 c o z rho "� or r s° SIB$ °e aa<5� NU i iL !oea_e., a o '�. 'W =� e��=� H es v > lz J u LU r a w 9� U 4m .. C3 f- V) LL. Cc rc Zw 2 IL 6 ci Cc iZ " uj LU � ll co "i ir. L ml Mu Q z z 0 0 Amil CL 0 i 11 z z 0 LU z 0 M z 'A z O�- Z IM W LU z L :7 can b. w ill ill 0 X nw IM w I TI r LU EL 0 0 Z Ir 0 vd og M-1 - - W k ¢ Jdag �s –F, Z 0 it z 2 wz ry Ij LU 0 Cc OR C, 0 Co- IZ w OZ 0 z LU t Ow 4 LL I C Z W �=�m p a �. 3° T W m m ELI o +70 _ a z4 g L LU as m= ao <o Qm r LU N ol 11 V i Ivy 'yam a LU > LU C) "NIW ZL j or LU m r w % U >r w J > > ¢ > Ll a > a 01 lm,o ELLII --" UNION LLI •110 _ •ILY• LLI LL a ; zi Fin i- LLJ w �ow 2 I w _ ° I a y I I - w�3E�o _ H fA W rn c 06 z W V a s° I am�5 _ . w - r _ W w _- a iv a 3 3m 5- - s3_ - r 0- = v w �a 3Z€S Nna ' m w w 0 0 w o m a s s o €L o Z ° G _ V co _ S �Z tn2 W t` W y _•� _ — - - - - V F / G a � w Lut6 HU_ win zQ n pw z �mmmm Mamm mow � w"� �° o �° mm �mm�2m J -� d m 3ZI53dldf N 3ZIS3dldf =i •110 W a nom„ v a _ C) 3$ I— ► o ° qq cc W m V m ~ W a VZ 4 = pp o c - aY aCO o E 3 E w f\ W o a U _ in LU cc _ L w � ` I = T � r TT -- T 1 _ d R h;4 � Aasw� �s co 'a3 �E z LU — °zm U wl CD L W I _ \ � W v ww 3 N a a or e r, n m W) Z z LJL CC z 6 g 5z Zw L LU $LL ci goo L-L 044 0 z 0 cc :u z z 0 "K z 0 JU RD LL, MR zo II 1c (A RE L4 LU c 88Nqrn�a '7 00 ®0 w c si -1 'H HL� ON p A = uP.40- osp P, Z T t ME HE 6 E-2 mu �g ig 92-- 2E. z It E E dp - - j Pm E S 'j, RE jp 5E E�WE E r, '2 M6 E.A E u re ga, -12 vE gi s -6 il 'ETi E oym M -_mYc 'Us % . 'E tit H E°'5 !E- it; E 6 . SE `o 2 -flE E--- E E EZ� d 6 d d 5 - E . . . . ` . . . . . . . . . . . . . a. E4 �ET ATTACHMENT "C" Approved Aesthetic Review for the Public Works Compound CITY COMMISSION ITEM 200 April 10, 2006 Meeting Consent Information Public Hearing X Regular MGR. /DEPT Authorization REQUEST: The Community Development Department- Planning Division requests that the Commission hold a Public Hearing for the Aesthetic Review of the new Public Works buildings located on Old Sanford Oviedo Road. PURPOSE: To encourage creative, effective, and flexible architectural standards and cohesive community development consistent with the intent and purpose of Article XI - Minimum Community Appearance and Aesthetic Review Standards. APPLICABLE LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY: Ordinance 2003 -43, Aesthetic Review Standards, City of Winter Springs Section 9 -601. Approval prerequisite for permits. Section 9 -605. Submittal requirements. Section 20 -486. Signs. [General Design Standards for Redevelopment Area (SR 434)] Development Agreement Approved May 9, 2005 CHRONOLOGY: Sept. 26, 2005- Final Engineering Plans Approved Feb. 20, 2005- Pre - Construction Meeting held CONSIDERATIONS: Code requires all commercial structures to include an Aesthetic Review. The submittal requirements for aesthetic review are set forth in Section 9 -605 and include the spaces; (c) illustrations of all walls, fences, and other accessory structures and the indication of height and their associated materials; (d) elevation of proposed exterior permanent signs or other constructed elements other than habitable space, if any; (e) illustrations of materials, texture, and colors to be used on all buildings, accessory structures, exterior signs; and (f) other architectural and engineering data as may be required. The procedures for review and approval are set forth in Section 9 -603. s� a'� April 10, 2006 Public Hearing Item 200 Page 2 of 3 The City Commission may approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove the application only after consideration of whether the following criteria have been satisfied: (1) The plans and specifications of the proposed project indicate that the setting, landscaping, proportions, materials, colors, textures, scale, unity, balance, rhythm, contrast, and simplicity are coordinated in a harmonious manner relevant to the particular proposal, surrounding area and cultural character of the community. The site is located in the City's industrial area on Old Sanford Oviedo Road. The proposed buildings will utilize a stucco facade over CMU at the base of the structures with metal wall panels and a metal standing seam roof. These materials are harmonious in character with an industrial area. (2) The plans for the proposed project are in harmony with any future development which has been formally approved by the City within the surrounding area. There are no other current development proposals within the surrounding area. (3) The plans for the proposed project are not excessively similar or dissimilar to any other building, structure or sign which is either fully constructed, permitted but not fully constructed, or included on the same permit application, and facing upon the same or intersecting street within five hundred (500) feet of the proposed site, with respect to one or more of the following features of exterior design and appearance: (A) Front or side elevations, (B) Size and arrangement of elevation facing the street, including reverse arrangement, (C) Other significant features of design such as, but not limited to: materials, roof line, hardscape improvements, and height or design elements. All of the proposed buildings utilize the same color scheme and materials. Wall and roof heights vary between buildings which results in the buildings not being excessively similar. (4) The plans for the proposed project are in harmony with, or significantly enhance, the established character of other buildings, structures or signs in the surrounding area with respect to architectural specifications and design features deemed significant based upon commonly accepted architectural principles of the local community. The proposed buildings are attractive and will enhance the character of the industrial area. (5) The proposed project is consistent and compatible with the intent and purpose of this Article, the Comprehensive Plan for Winter Springs, design criteria adopted by the city (e.g. Towne Center guidelines, SR 434 design specifications) and other applicable federal state or local laws. The proposed buildings are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and City Code requirements. (6) The proposed project has incorporated significant architectural enhancements such as concrete masonry units with stucco, marble,'termite- resistant wood, wrought iron, brick, columns April 10, 2006 Public Hearing Item 200 Page 3 of 3 and piers, porches, arches, fountains, planting areas, display windows, and other distinctive design detailing and promoting the character of the community. The buildings are to be constructed of CMU with a stucco facade at the base with metal wall panels above. The color scheme for the walls is a tan and grey combination with a stucco banding painted in contrasting colors and highlighted with white to coordinate with the white standing seam roof. The color scheme of the buildings will make the buildings attractive while maintaining their functional capacity. The dumpster enclosure replicates these same wall colors. No walls or signage is being proposed at this time. FINDINGS: • The new buildings utilize colors and materials that are appropriate to the industrial location. • The proposed buildings will upgrade the character of the industrial area and will be an asset to the community. • The proposed buildings are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and City Code requirements. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff review found the Applicant's request for Aesthetic Review in compliance and, therefore, recommends Approval. ATTACHMENTS: A. Aesthetic Review Package COMMISSION ACTION: ■ �s P A U U w U v Q N� M 0 3 m E m c � V1 ct o z° CL o c m3 O 14x Zia UBld ePS 1 ja epuold 'sBuudg jelulM aa $ 8 44 A411108:1 s�ljoM o!IQed a a s gfi s6uijds jajuiM jo Akio o 0 m W a m iw I I � I I w I I I r „_ I r J = �oxm w m 0 m © m / W 0 a _, 'o 0 wm o 1 d ? p] 1 1 0 m W; 1 1 1 QLL' F �� I O W 1 1 1 1 1 � IQQi� 1 1 1 1 - -- LN �oxm w m 0 m © m / W 0 _, 'o 0 wm o suoiJeA913 Z •6p18 _ s s eppolj IsBupdg jejulM § N 41110ej SIJOM o!19ed s6wjdg ja;uiM jo Aj10 N 0 3 a� s� U E 10 uol;en913 J0100 Z 418 aga eppoij 'Sbuuds ieluiM i fig® AlllmA s�,.M o9Q^d € UN fr s6uudg �a ;uiM jo �(;10 J -Oo 3 z ? R o ra w - � I w u�0 gm� of _� z w _ w U I az wo- �We O W~ ;mow r z a " a 0 a U - U s> f FO pa ❑ H 211Jc r m rc 210 Q " a O U Z'e 0O Wm �a3 z— Q a " 4 1] 4 �� |• � \ � WIN SU014BAel3 S 'BPIG _a' A je4ujM Allpll:d OVOM 011qnd si5uij 04 M Jo A4!0 n dS Je4ul j) �\ � � � / \ � j III ; i |; , 'I z z | . u ogle n el] Jo |0 0 E D pla |q mw A _« ■ | i ■ | | _. _d |. ■| | | Rl ! |!\ SDuijd S jelui« jo A! |0 _ _ | § 9.� § M / 0 z 9 2 2 0 £ c z } LLJ o o . ... � '1398 PUB 'A913 V '6P18 oppoij '95updS je4ujM 411!09=1 evom 0114nd sf)uijdS jejuiM jo Aj!o dA '1� Im --------------------- ---------------------- E --------------------- ----- ---------------- --------------------- ---------------------- --------------------- --------------------- ---------------------- C==== - - - - - - - - - - - - | Q( ugl22913 Jgog # 418 |$ ■ | | 2% .d SDui�d S �elu�M !0 Apo � . | B §z `, [7 : (� B )� [7 : a. LU )� /§ LU � � ca a / §!r LU 2 !!! _ « §b : /` (: | . u 014E « 813 00 |0 0 9 'D PI8 Q\ _ate k « | || | | ■ | | " « _a ! fai SBuijd S aelu |M !0 Ain � _ _ |! \ z Cl ( \§ muj ) \ ( § \0 � � a � � /� k Z § - ( [ CL \(\ muj ) \ ( § \0 � � a � � §!'z k Z § § M § muj ) \ ( § \0 � � a � � � � a � � 7c Yp 3HnSO1ON3 a31Sdvgna 3� s appold 'sBupdg ielulM gg- Allllosd sjjoM oll9sd fi s6updS jajuwM }o Aj!o QZ o ih m e �a 9 R i 19 Q l� it .# V W m, r� hl W IL S2 If M�Q W W 7 Z _,10 A j z� m lug lit Z if 91 1 Ing ! 7 1 a � $ tZ7 78Q3 b a Y XX ry Jj W L �W If M�Q W W 7 Z _,10 A j z� m lug lit Z if 91 1 Ing ! 7 1