HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015 06 08 Consent 302 Bridge Master PlanCOMMISSION AGENDA
ITEM 302
Informational
Consent
X
Public Hearings
Regular
June 08, 2015 KS KL
Regular Meeting City Manager Department
REQUEST:
The Public Works Department requesting City Commission adoption of the
proposed Bridge Master Plan.
SYNOPSIS:
The Bridge Master Plan is an engineering evaluation of 15 major bridges in the City. The
Master Plan identifies any deficiencies, and includes cost estimates plus a prioritization
schedule for necessary bridge repairs and /or replacements. The Bridge Master Plan was
recently completed by Volkert, Inc., and concluded that the City's bridges are all in
satisfactory condition and have an average time to replacement of 38 years. The Master
Plan identified approximately $2.0 million in repairs to be performed over the next 10 years
on the 15 bridges.
CONSIDERATIONS:
In October 2014 the Public Works Department hired Volkert., Inc. to prepare a
citywide Bridge Master Plan. The purpose of the master plan was to: 1) assess the
condition of 15 vehicular bridges in the City; 2) prepare a prioritized list of necessary
bridge repairs with estimated costs; and 3) determine the years to replacement and
cost to replace for all 15 bridges.
Volkert, Inc. was selected to perform the Bridge Master Plan for the City because
they are the current Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) bridge inspection
consultant. FDOT currently performs bridge inspections of all City -owned bridges
every two years, at no cost to the City, as part of FDOT's statewide bridge inspection
program. After each inspection, the City is provided an inspection report that
Consent 302 PAGE 1 OF 3 - June 08, 2015
summarizes the bridge condition, identifies deficiencies, and recommends any
corrective actions. Volkert has inspected the City's bridges for the past several years
as part of their inspection contract with FDOT.
The City owns and maintains 12 bridges that are on the FDOT inspection schedule,
listed as follows:
• Northern Way South Loop over Howell Creek
• Northern Way North Loop over Howell Creek
• Northern Way North Loop over Bear Creek
• Murphy Road over Gee Creek
• South Edgemon Avenue over Gee Creek
• Sheoah Blvd. over Sheoah Creek
• Shepard Road over Sheoah Creek
• Winter Springs Blvd. over Howell Creek
• Winter Springs Blvd. over Bear Creek
• Winding Hollow Blvd. over Little Lake Howell Creek
• Hayes Road over Gee Creek
• Moss Road over Gee Creek
The Dyson Drive bridge over Howell Creek is half in the City and half in Seminole
County. Since this bridge was recently replaced by Seminole County it was not
included in the Bridge Master Plan.
In addition to the 12 bridges listed above, Staff had the following three additional
bridges /crossings included in the Bridge Master Plan:
• Shore Road over Gee Creek
• Alton Road over Gee Creek
• Costa Rica Drive over Gee Creek (owned by Hacienda Village)
The Bridge Master Plan (see Exhibit A attached) identified approximately $2.0
million in recommended repairs to the 15 bridges. Approximately $1.7 million of the
repairs are at one bridge, the Northern Way North Loop over Howell Creek. This
bridge is classified as "scour critical," meaning that due to unknown information
about the bridge's foundation system, the integrity of the foundation may be
vulnerable to erosion during extreme storm events. If the repair cost is indeed in the
range of $1.7 million, a bridge replacement at a cost of $1.4 million would be more
cost effective. Staff intends to implement further testing at the Northern Way North
Loop bridge over Howell Creek, as recommended in the Master Plan, to determine
the foundation system in place and possibly mitigate some of the potential repair
costs. The remainder of the recommended repairs will be scheduled for repairs over
the next two years, with the prioritization to follow the recommendations in the
Master Plan as listed in Appendix D.
The Bridge Master Plan includes an estimated schedule and replacement cost for all
15 bridges. The average time to replace for all bridges is 38 years, which is a good
indicator of the overall satisfactory condition of the City's bridges. The earliest
bridge replacement is Northern Way South Loop over Howell Creek, which is
recommended for replacement in 8 years at a cost of $731,000. Staff intends to
monitor this bridge over the next several years and will work closely with FDOT and
the FDOT bridge inspection consultant to determine when a replacement should be
scheduled. The funding source for a bridge replacement is likely to be the One -Cent
Consent 302 PAGE 2 OF 3 - June 08, 2015
Infrastructure Sales Tax (3rd generation) passed in 2014. After the Northern Way
South Loop bridge over Howell Creek, the next scheduled bridge replacement is in 22
years for the Shepard Road bridge over Sheoah Creek.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The City Commission's adoption of the Bridge Master Plan has no direct fiscal impact and
this agenda item is not requesting any funding. Funding for future bridge repairs and /or
replacements will follow the City's normal budgeting and approval process.
COMMUNICATION EFFORTS:
This Agenda Item has been electronically forwarded to the Mayor and City Commission,
City Manager, City Attorney /Staff, and is available on the City's Website, LaserFiche, and
the City's Server. Additionally, portions of this Agenda Item are typed verbatim on the
respective Meeting Agenda which has also been electronically forwarded to the individuals
noted above, and which is also available on the City's Website, LaserFiche, and the City's
Server; has been sent to applicable City Staff, Media/Press Representatives who have
requested Agendas /Agenda Item information, Homeowner's Associations/Representatives
on file with the City, and all individuals who have requested such information. This
information has also been posted outside City Hall, posted inside City Hall with additional
copies available for the General Public, and posted at five (5) different locations around the
City. Furthermore, this information is also available to any individual requestors. City Staff
is always willing to discuss this Agenda Item or any Agenda Item with any interested
individuals.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Commission adopt the Bridge Master Plan.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Exhibit A - Bridge Master Plan (52 pages)
Consent 302 PAGE 3 OF 3 - June 08, 2015
Bridge Master Plan
Prepared for:
City of Winter Springs
Incorporated
1959
Prepared by:
VOLKERT, INC.
1405 N. Westshore Blvd.
Suite 600
Tampa, Florida 33607
(813) 875 -1365
May 2015
S 1Work - FloridaTiry of Winter SpringslWorcKowr. doc
N\011111111111/1/ ii
o
S 3
• STA�E�,�J;'
90,E • O R 4
May 1, 2015
Project No: 453100.63
City of Winter Springs
Department of Public Works
City Hall
1126 E. State Road 434
Winter Springs, FL 32708
Attention: Brian Fields, P.E.
Reference: Bridge Master Plan
Gentlemen:
We are pleased to submit this report which focuses on budgetary planning for long term maintenance
of the City's bridges. The objectives are to assess the maintenance needs for the bridges and provide
the City with annualized budgetary information supporting a long term bridge maintenance program.
SUMMARY
The City is responsible for 15 bridges that carry vehicular traffic. We have developed a listing of
deficiencies for each of the vehicular bridges, prepared cost estimates for repairs and replacements, and
incorporated time frame prioritization to estimate the annualized cost.
DESCRIPTION OF THE CITY'S BRIDGES
Following is a listing of the City's 15 bridges that are included in this budget planning report.
The table identifies a few specific data items about each bridge including age; classifications regarding
structural deficiency, functional obsolescence, and scour criticalness; and ratings for load and
sufficiency.
City of Winter Springs
Department of Public Works
05/01/15
Page 2 of 6
BRIDGE INVENTORY
IDENTIFIERS
AGE
CLASSIFICATIONS
RATINGS
APPROX
.
FSOLE
SCOUR
LOAD
BRIDGE
FACILITY
FEATURE
AGE OF
DEFICIENT
DEFICIENT
OBSOLETE
CRITICAL
SUFF.
RATING
HEALTH
NO.
CARRIED
INTERSECTED
BRIDGE
(Y /N)
(Y /N)
(Y /N)
RATING
(INVENTORY)
INDEX
(YRS)
TONS
NORTHERN
HOWELL
775703
WAY SOUTH
CREEK
41
N
N
N
54.3
17.0
77.18
LOOP
775704
MURPHY RD
GEE CREEK
41
N
N
N
98.6
42.7
49.24
SOUTH
775705
EDGEMON
GEE CREEK
41
N
N
N
98.4
39.1
70.46
AVE
775707
SHEOAH
SHEOAH
42
N
Y
N
76.8
39.6
77.23
BLVD
CREEK
775708
SHEPARD
SHEOAH
42
N
Y
N
63.5
23.0
99.33
RD
CREEK
NORTHERN
HOWELL
775709
WAY NORTH
CREEK
33
N
N
Y
85.3
29.9
68.52
LOOP
775710
NORTHERN
BEAR CREEK
33
N
N
N
89.3
38.5
85.62
WINTER
775711
SPRINGS
HOWELL
32
N
N
N
94.7
58.9
81.11
BLVD
CREEK
WINTER
775712
SPRINGS
BEAR CREEK
27
N
N
Y
95.1
38.5
80.52
BLVD
WINDING
LITTLE LAKE
775713
HOLLOW
HOWELL
19
N
N
N
89.3
56.4
60.10
BLVD
CREEK
775714
HAYES RD
GEE CREEK
17
N
N
N
97.4
33.0
74.77
775715
MOSS RD
GEE CREEK
16
N
N
N
99.3
35.9
77.15
N/A
SHORE RD
GEE CREEK
UNKNOWN
N
N
N
100.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
ALTON RD
GEE CREEK
UNKNOWN
N
N
N
100.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
COSTA RICA
GEE CREEK
UNKNOWN
N
N
N
90.1
N/A
N/A
The columns in the table above are explained as follows:
To be Structurally Deficient the major components of a bridge are in poor condition, or the overall
structural evaluation is basically intolerable requiring a high priority of replacement. Additionally, a
waterway that is basically intolerable requiring a high priority of replacement will render a
classification of structurally deficient.
To be Functionally Obsolete the deck geometry, the underside clearances, or the overall structural
evaluation or the waterway adequacy must be basically intolerable requiring a high priority of
corrective action.
To be Scour Critical the bridge abutments or pier foundations are rated as unstable due to observed
scour at the bridge site or scour potential as determined from a scour evaluation study.
S: \Work - Florida \City of Winter Springs \Word \Report. doe
City of Winter Springs
Department of Public Works
05/01/15
Page 3 of 6
The Sufficiency Rating is a value from zero to 100 that is used for evaluating highway bridge data. It
is indicative of a bridge's sufficiency to remain in service. The sufficiency rating is calculated using
four separate factors: Structural Adequacy and Safety, Serviceability and Functional Obsolescence,
Essentiality for Public Use, and Special Reductions. An entirely sufficient bridge would have a
sufficiency rating of 100 and an entirely insufficient or deficient bridge would have a zero.
An Inventory Load Rating results in a load level which can safely utilize the bridge for an indefinite
period of time.
The Health Index is a tool that measures the overall condition of the bridge taking into consideration
10 to 12 different bridge elements. A lower health index means that more work would be required to
improve the bridge to an ideal condition. A health index below 85 generally indicates that some repairs
are needed, although it does not mean the bridge is unsafe. A low health index may also indicate that it
would be more economical to replace the bridge than to repair it.
FINDINGS — BASIC COSTS
Bridge Repair Costs
We collected and reviewed the bridge inspection reports for the City's 12 Florida Department of
Transportation (FDOT) qualifier bridges and their 3 non - qualifier bridges. We estimated quantities for
the repairs and estimated the repair costs based primarily on using FDOT historical bid prices.
Individual cost estimates for repair of the bridges are contained in Appendix B.
Some of the most common deficiencies that were documented were cracked and spalled areas of
concrete, missing or damaged railings, deck joint deficiencies, guardrail damage, slope and bank
erosion, and bridge deck expansion joint deficiencies.
The total estimated construction cost of repairing the current deficiencies in the City's 15 bridges is
approximately $2,013,339 which includes allowances for mobilization, maintenance of traffic,
contingencies, price escalation, design, and construction engineering and inspection (CEI). This is a
one -time cost and only one mobilization per bridge is assumed.
Bridge Replacement Costs
We applied the FDOT Bridge Cost per Square Foot prices (Appendix C) considering the existing plan
area for bridge removal and the current FDOT bridge section requirements for new construction.
Individual cost estimate spreadsheets for the replacement of the bridges are located in Appendix C.
The total cost of replacing all 15 bridges is estimated to be approximately $13,769,201. This includes
an allowance for utilities, approach roadway, maintenance of traffic, contingencies, design, and CEI.
S: \Work - Florida \City of Winter Springs \Word \Report. doe
City of Winter Springs
Department of Public Works
05/01/15
Page 4 of 6
ANNUALIZED COSTS
Annualized costs were developed as average amounts over the respective periods of time for repair and
replacement.
Repairs
The itemized repairs for each bridge were segregated into four work priority groups:
Emergency, Urgent, Routine, and Informational. The work priority groups were developed based on
the "Florida Greenbook" and FDOT's Bridge Maintenance Management Handbook. Within each
group are priority levels A, B, C, etc. which generally related to primary members, secondary
members, and operational conditions respectively. These four groups are more completely defined and
described in the bridge evaluation memorandum in Appendix A. The FDOT Bridge Maintenance and
Repair Handbook was also consulted in order to itemize quantities for the various repairs, and is a
good resource for the means and methods in which to complete the documented repairs.
We assigned a year by which the repairs generally would be expected to be completed according to the
priority groups as summarized below:
1 year: Emergency IA, IB, and IC; Urgent IIA, IIB, IIC
2 years: Urgent IID
3 years: Routine IIIA, IIIB, IIIC
8 years: Informational IVA and
10 years: Informational IVB
The breakdown of categorized repairs is summarized in Appendix D.
Appendix D also documents the annualized cost calculations for repairs of each bridge.
Replacements
A formula to estimate remaining service is not found in AASHTO or FDOT publications making
estimates somewhat subjective. Although 75 years is often applied as a "ballpark" figure, service life
can vary widely from bridge to bridge.
For our approach, we developed a replacement year for each bridge considering the era in which the
structure was built, the environment, the structure type, and the current Structural Evaluation by FDOT
(Appendix E).
Those replacement years were applied to the individual replacement costs shown in Appendix C. That
calculation is presented in Appendix E.
S: \Work - Florida \City of Winter Springs \Word \Report. doe
City of Winter Springs
Department of Public Works
05/01/15
Page 5 of 6
SCOUR CRITICAL BRIDGES
The City has two bridges, Bridge No. 775709 and Bridge No. 775712, which are identified as Scour
Critical bridges. Both of these bridges have a scour evaluation report and a scour critical bridge plan of
action associated with them, and both the report and plan of action have recommendations for
alleviating the scour issues at each bridge. The plan of action was updated in June 2014 by Volkert,
Inc. after the completion of the latest inspection (also conducted by Volkert, Inc.). After further review
and discussion of this information, it is our opinion to follow the guidelines and recommendations
presented within these documents, including the scope of repairs as presented. These items have been
added to our proposed bridge repair estimates in Appendix B, and the associated costs have been
updated based on current MOT Statewide Cost Averages.
One possible way to mitigate some of the potential cost of the proposed scour countermeasures is to
implement further testing to determine the foundation system for the bridges. Currently both bridges
have a foundation system defined as "unknown" and thusly assumptions have to be made which can
lead to conservative estimates for remediation. The cost (per bridge) to conduct the foundation testing
and subsequently revise the scour report/plan of action would be on the order of $40,000 and $50,000
respectively. This initial fee could produce a smaller total cost of rehabilitation for the City in the long
run.
The consideration of providing these repairs or replacing the bridge entirely is dependent upon many
factors. Analyzing the cost analysis presented in this report, as well as the functional life remaining for
both bridges, it would seem to benefit the City more to repair Bridge 775712 rather than replace it, due
to the relatively low repair to replacement cost ratio and the approximation of 47 years until
replacement is necessary or required. Bridge 775709 however, purely based on a cost estimate
standpoint, could be a candidate to replace rather than repair, as our estimates are actually showing a
higher total cost to repair the bridge.
It should be noted that these are only estimates and can only provide initial analysis. Further
investigation may need to be conducted by the City to determine the viability of these options.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on our findings, a total of approximately $2,013,339 is needed for repairs to the current bridges.
As shown in Appendix D, based on the category of repairs documented, approximately $1,853,244
should be budgeted annually. As you can see, this annual budget is actually a very high percentage of
the total estimate, with the majority of funds required for the first year of repairs at both scour critical
bridges. Therefore, the City could plan to address the two scour critical bridges separately for the first
year (approximate cost of $1,759,443), but allow the remaining bridges to be considered together, as
this would result in a significantly reduced annual budget for years 2 -10.
S: \Work - Florida \City of Winter Springs \Word \Report. doe
City of Winter Springs
Department of Public Works
05/01/15
Page 6 of 6
For the replacement of the bridges, a total of approximately $13,769,201 is needed. The average
annual cost calculated in Appendix E is approximately $426,803. This number; however, represents
budgeting for the replacement of the bridges based on today's economy with today's pricing.
Considering the average years to replacement of all the 15 bridges is approximately 38 years, more
emphasis should be put on the total amount needed, as the City decides on planning its budget long
term.
It should be noted that only the current inventory of 15 bridges was considered. Should the City
assume responsibility for additional bridges, additional funding would be required. Additionally, storm
events, vehicular collisions, and other conditions would certainly change the state of the City's bridges.
The budget should be periodically re- evaluated.
This evaluation applies broad averages and makes certain assumptions and considerations of how the
City's bridge program might be managed but specifically does not attempt to develop a total bridge
maintenance program.
Volkert appreciates the opportunity to provide these professional engineering services to the City of
Winter Springs. Please contact us if you have any questions or comments.
Very truly yours,
VOLKERT, INC.
01 /&
Mark S. Lauckner, P.E.
P.E. No. 58663
Project Manager
SAWork - Fiorida\City of Winter SpringslWord\Report.doc
Volkert, Inc.
Certificate of Authorization No. 4641
APPENDIX A
MEMORANDUM
Project No. 453100.63
To: Mr. Brian Fields, P.E.
From: Mr. Mark S. Lauckner, P.E.
Date: May 1, 2015
RE: Bridge Master Plan
This memorandum is to summarize the priority levels and the definitions thereof that we are
suggesting for the repairs recommended for the referenced bridges. These were developed
with primary guidance obtained from the "Florida Greenbook" 2011 along with secondary
guidance found in the FDOT's Bridge Maintenance Management Handbook, 1996 and
FDOT's Bridge Operations and Maintenance Manual, 1995 regarding bridge work need
categories. A major difference between FDOT's publications and the Greenbook is FDOT
does not include upgrades to safety features as does the Greenbook. It should be noted that,
according to the FDOT Bridge Maintenance Management Handbook, prioritization is
independent from the need to accomplish the work. This makes prioritization a somewhat
subjective exercise. It should also be noted that in scheduling the work, greater economy can
sometimes be obtained in combining similar work types. Thus some lower priority work may
need to be scheduled ahead of other higher priority work items.
We have included four priority groups as follows:
I. Emergency Maintenance
II. Urgent Maintenance and Upgrading Safety Features
III. Routine Maintenance
IV. Informational
Within each group are priority levels A, B, C, etc. which generally relate to primary
members, secondary members and operational conditions respectively.
S: \Work - Florida \City of Winter Springs \Word \Priorities.doc
The groups and levels generally correspond to FDOT's work need categorization except that
upgrading safety features (Priority II D) was added following Urgent Maintenance and
preceding Routine Maintenance.
PRIORITY GROUP I
MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY TYPE: EMERGENCY MAINTENANCE
Emergency maintenance operations are those required to immediately restore the highway to
a safe condition. Ref.- Florida Greenbook, Chapter 10 Article F.1.
Repairs must begin immediately to restore critical damages on the structure and to ensure the
safety of the traveling public. Ref.- FDOT Bridge Operations and Maintenance Manual,
Article 311 C.1.
Priority I A, "Imminent" Failure Condition (Numerical Condition Rating (NCR) = 1)
Major deterioration, section loss, or damage of primary structural members or components.
Bridge is closed to traffic until corrective action is taken. Ref.- FDOT, Bridge Maintenance
Management Handbook, Article 5.1.1.
Priority I B, Critical Condition (NCR = 2)
Advanced deterioration or damage of primary structural members or components. Unless
closely monitored, traffic to the bridge may be restricted or the bridge may be closed until
corrective action is taken. Ref.- FDOT, Bridge Maintenance Management Handbook, Article
5.1.2.
Priority I C, Operational Conditions
Any condition or damage that is a clear and present danger to the structure or to motorists,
pedestrians, or mariners traveling on or under the bridge. Ref.- FDOT, Bridge Maintenance
Management Handbook, Article 5.1.3.
PRIORITY GROUP II
MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY TYPE: URGENT MAINTENACE AND UPGRADING
SAFETY FEATURES
Restore deteriorated primary components of the bridge to a safe and serviceable condition.
Ref.- FDOT Maintenance Management Handbook, Article 5.2.
S: \Work - Florida \City of Winter Springs \Word \Priorities.doc
Special maintenance operations are defined as those projects that are neither urgent nor
routine in nature, but are occasionally required to improve or maintain a street or highway in
a quality condition. Special maintenance should include the upgrading of the highway safety
features, as well as the repair or replacement of damaged or deteriorated highway
components. Ref: "Florida Greenbook" Chapter 10, Article E3.
Repairs which must be completed to correct deficiencies or defects in order to protect the
integrity of the structure or to maintain a desired level of performance. Ref: FDOT Bridge
Operations and Maintenance Manual, Article 3. 11. C. 2.
Priority II A, Urgent, Serious Conditions (NCR = 3)
Loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour that seriously affect primary structural
members or components. Local failures are possible. Ref: FDOT Bridge Maintenance
Management Handbook, Article 5.2. 1.
Priority II B, Urgent, Poor Conditions (NCR = 4)
Advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour that may affect primary structural
members or components. Ref: FDOT Bridge Maintenance Management Handbook, Article
5.2.2.
Priority II C, Urgent, Operational Conditions
Any condition or damage to equipment or element that prevents the equipment from
performing its intended function at an acceptable level of reliability and /or effectiveness.
Ref: FDOT Bridge Maintenance Management Handbook, Article 5.2.3.
Priority II D, Upgrading Safety Features
The improvement or correction of situations that may result in fatal or serious crashes.
Ref: "Florida Greenbook, " Chapter 10, Article E.
The fact that a major portion of maintenance effort is necessary to merely preserve the
economic investment in a facility should not be considered as justification for sacrificing the
requirements for maintaining or improving the safety characteristics of a street or highway.
Ref: "Florida Greenbook, " Chapter 10, Article A.
Every effort should be made to ensure the highest safety payoff from the maintenance dollar.
Ref: "Florida Greenbook, " Chapter 10, Article E.
S: \Work - Florida \City of Winter Springs \Word \Priorities.doc
PRIORITY GROUP III
MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY TYPE: ROUTINE MAINTENANCE
Routine maintenance operations are those that may be predicted and planned in advance.
These operations, which may be preventive or corrective in nature, should be conducted on a
regularly scheduled basis using standard procedures. Ref: "Florida Greenbook, " Chapter 10,
Article E2.
The routine category includes minor repair and associated tasks necessary to maintain (keep)
a safe and efficient transportation system, including the cleaning, maintenance, and minor
repair of bridge structures. Ref: FDOT Bridge Maintenance Management Handbook, Article
5.3.
Maintenance or repairs which must be completed to maintain existing level of performance
and to prevent additional deterioration or to extend the service life of the structure.
Ref: FDOT Bridge Operations and Maintenance Manual, Article 3.11.C.3.
Priority III A, Fair Conditions (NCR = 5)
All primary structural elements are sound (i.e. no loss of strength), but may have minor
section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
Priority III B, Secondary Structural Elements/Members
Advanced section loss, deterioration, or spalling of secondary structural members such as
bracing, lacing bars and batten plates on tangent multi -beam and multi - girder bridges.
Priority III C, Non - Structural Elements/Members
Advanced section loss, deterioration, or spalling of non - structural members such as deck
expansion joints, drainage systems, bridge railing, fender systems, slope protection, and
walkways. Includes any condition or damage to equipment or element that allows the
equipment or element to perform its intended function, but at a reduced level of reliability
and /or effectiveness.
PRIORITY GROUP IV
MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY TYPE: INFORMATIONAL
Work needs in this category are intended to correct superficial deterioration or problems that
do not currently affect the strength of the bridge. Included in this category are minor
maintenance and repairs to secondary and non - structural members as well as cosmetic and
preventive maintenance to primary structural members. Ref: FDOT Bridge Maintenance
Management Handbook, Article 5.4.
S: \Work - Florida \City of Winter Springs \Word \Priorities.doc
Work that is superficial to the integrity of the structure. Ref: FDOT Bridge Operations and
Maintenance Manual, Article 3. 11. C. 4.
Priority IV A, Satisfactory Conditions (NCR = 6)
Conditions are sufficient to meet the structural or functional requirements of the element;
however, elements show some minor deterioration.
Priority IV B, Good Conditions (NCR = 7)
Generally good conditions with some minor problems. The distinction between the NCR of 6
and 7 is not so much a qualitative distinction, but rather a quantitative distinction. A NCR 7
defect may have similar conditions as for a NCR 6, only fewer of them.
S: \Work - Florida \City of Winter Springs \Word \Priorities.doc
APPENDIX B
VOLKERT
Project No.: 453100.63
Description: Northern Way South Loop over Howell Creek
Designer: MME Date: 12.17.14
No. Inspector Recommendations
1 Clean and seal deck joints over the end bents
2 Seal open joint between northwest wingwall cap and sheet pile panel
3 Remove graffiti on the structure underside
2
2
Bridge 775703
DESIGN COMPUTATIONS
Sheet No: of
Checker: MSL Date: 01.07.15
Priority
III C
III A
IV 13
Pay Item
IDescription
I Unit
I Quantityl
Rate
I Total
Group III A
411 -1
Epoxy material for Crack Injection - Structures
Rehab
GA
1
$ 141.67
$ 141.67
411 -2
Cracks Inject & Seal - Structures Rehab
LF
15
$ 46.69
$ 700.35
Sub -Total
$ 842.02
Group III
C
458 -1 -21
Bridge Deck Expansion Joint, Rehabilitation,
Poured Joint with Backer Rod
LF
71
$ 56.16
$ 3,987.36
Sub -Total
$ 3,987.36
Group IV B
563 -4
Anti - Graffiti Coating, Non - Sacrificial
SF
1627
$ 0.95
$ 1,545.65
Sub -Total
$ 1,545.65
TOTAL
$ 6,375.03
S: \Work - Florida \City of Winter Springs \Excel \Bridge Repair Cost Estimates.xlsBrdg 775703
VOLKERT
Project No.: 453100.63
Description: Murphy Rd over Gee Creek
Designer: MME Date: 12.17.14
No. Inspector Recommendations
1 Replace all cushion blocks for guardrail
2 Repair 7 deficiencies including spalls, delaminations and a popout, listed in Table 1 of the addendum
3 Apply coating on lower 6 inches of walls on all three cells to protect from scale
4 Remove vegetation and install toe wall protection west end of culvert
5 Fill and stabilize east end of culvert
4
4
5
Brdg 775704
DESIGN COMPUTATIONS
Sheet No: of
Checker: MSL Date: 01.07.15
Priority
11
III A
III A
III C
III C
Pay Item
Description
Unit
Quantity
Rate
Total
Group II D
536 -83 -1
Guardrail Post Replacement, Regular
EA
30
$ 50.00
$ 1,500.00
Sub -Total
$ 1,500.00
Group III A
401 -70 -5
Restore Spalled Areas, Contractor's Option
CF
2.2
$ 400.00
$ 880.00
400 -150
Cleaning and Sealing Existing Concrete
Surfaces
SF
120
$ 25.00
$ 3,000.00
Sub -Total
$ 3,880.00
Group III C
110 -1 -1
Clearing & Grubbing
AC
0.04
$ 8,322.45
$ 332.90
530 -3 -4
Rip Rap - Rubble, F &I, Ditch Lining
TN
4.3
$ 81.99
$ 352.56
400 -4 -1
Concrete Class IV, Culverts
CY
0.6
$ 1,285.83
$ 771.50
Sub -Total
$ 1,456.95
TOTAL
$ 6,836.95
S: \Work - Florida \City of Winter S pri ngs\Excel\B ridge Repair Cost Estimates.xlsBrdg 775704
No.
1
2
3
4
5
1
2,3,4
VoIJCERT
Project No.: 453100.63
Description: South Edgemon Ave over Gee Creek
Designer: MME Date: 12.17.14
Inspector Recommendations
Replace all cushion blocks
Repair through holes in Wall 1 lower east end and east end of Wall
Repair spall top face of southwest wingwall at headwall
Repair delamination top face of northeast wingwall at headwall
Fill and stabilize void in southeast approach mowing strip
Bridae 775705
DESIGN COMPUTATIONS
Sheet No: of
Checker: MSL Date: 01.07.15
Priority
11
III A
III A
III A
III C
Pay Item
IDescription
I Unit
I Quantity
I Rate
I Total
Group II D
536 -83 -1
Guardrail Post Replacement, Regular
EA
22
$ 50.00
$ 1,100.00
Sub -Total
$ 1,100.00
Group III A
401 -70 -5
Restore Spalled Areas, Contractor's Option
CF
0.2
$ 400.00
$ 80.00
Sub -Total
$ 80.00
Group III
C
339 -1
Miscellaneous Asphalt Pavement
TN
0.1
$ 156.43
$ 15.64
Sub -Total
$ 15.64
TOTAL
$ 1,195.64
S: \Work - Florida \City of Winter Springs \Excel \Bridge Repair Cost Estimates.xlsBrdg 775705
VOLKERT
Project No.: 453100.63
Description: Sheoah Blvd over Sheoah Creek
Designer: MME Date: 12.17.14
DESIGN COMPUTATIONS
Sheet No: of
Checker: MSL Date: 01.07.15
No.
Inspector Recommendations
Priority
1
Clean and seal the asphalt cracks over both abutment joints
III C
2
Clean and seal the expansion joints in the sidewalks over both abutments
III C
3
Clean and paint the bridge rail post anchor bolts
III C
4
Replace split / decayed bridge rail post anchor bolt spacer
II D
5
Repair the settled and displaced rip rap bags at the left (west) side of Abutment 2
III C
6
Clean and back fill the hole in the concrete slope protection at the southeast corner
III C
7
Clean and paint or replace the utility hangers for the PVC conduit along the west edge
IV A
8
Repair the broken PVC conduit connection on the west edge
IV A
4
1
2
3
5
6
6
7
8
Bridae 775707
Pay Item
IDescription
I Unit
I Quantity
I Rate
I Total
Group II D
536 -83 -1
Guardrail Post Replacement, Regular
EA
26
$ 50.00
$ 1,300.00
Sub -Total
$ 1,300.00
Group III
C
305 -1
Bituminous Crack and Joint Sealing for
Asphaltic Concrete Roadway
LF
70
$ 40.00
$ 2,800.00
458 -1 -21
Bridge Deck Expansion Joint, Rehabilitation,
Poured Joint with Backer Rod
LF
10
$ 56.16
$ 561.60
561 -2
lCoating Existing Structural Steel
SF
3
$ 50.00
$ 150.00
530 -1
Rip Rap, Sand - Cement
CY
0.9
$ 559.84
$ 503.86
142 -70
Fill Sand
CY
1
$ 49.83
$ 49.83
524 -2 -2
Concrete Slope Pavement, Non - Reinforced, 4"
SY
1
$ 102.10
$ 102.10
Sub -Total
$ 4,167.39
Group IV A
561 -2
Coating Existing Structural Steel
SF
1
$ 50.00
$ 50.00
1055 -11 -244
Utility Fitting, F &I, PVC, Union, 8 "- 19.9"
EA
1
$ 1,091.27
$ 1,091.27
Sub -Total
$ 1,141.27
TOTAL
$ 6,608.66
S: \Work - Florida \City of Winter Springs \Excel \Bridge Repair Cost Estimates.xlsBrdg 775707
VOLKERT
Project No.: 453100.63
Description: Shepard Rd over Sheoah Creek
Designer: MME Date: 12.17.14
No. Inspector Recommendations
1 Remove corrosion and paint the right side bicycle rail post fasteners
2 Replace decayed bridge rail cushion blocks
3 Properly align all rotated bridge rail cushion blocks and install anti - rotation nails
4 Fill and stabilize undermined area at west edge of northwest approach sidewalk at Abutment 1
2,3
1
4
4
Bridge 775708
DESIGN COMPUTATIONS
Sheet No: of
Checker: MSL Date: 01.07.15
Priority
III C
11
11
III C
Pay Item
IDescription
I Unit
I Quantity
I Rate
I Total
Group II D
536 -83 -1
Guardrail Post Replacement, Regular
EA
32
$ 50.00
$ 1,600.00
Sub -Total
$ 1,600.00
Group III C
561 -2
Coating Existing Structural Steel
SF
3
$ 50.00
$ 150.00
142 -70
Fill Sand
CY
1
$ 49.83
$ 49.83
514 -71 -2
Plastic Filter Fabric, Stabilization
SY
1
$ 5.89
$ 5.89
Sub -Total
$ 205.72
TOTAL
$ 1,805.72
S: \Work - Florida \City of Winter Springs \Excel \Bridge Repair Cost Estimates.xlsBrdg 775708
VOLKERT
Project No.: 453100.63
Description: Northern Way over Howell Creek
Designer: MME Date: 12.17.14
DESIGN COMPUTATIONS
Sheet No: of
Checker: MSL Date: 01.07.15
No.
Inspector Recommendations
Priority
1
Repair spalling and delaminating at bottom face of End bent 3 cap
III A
2
Seal backwall to cap joints
III A
3
Replace northeast slope and eliminate backfill leakage
III C
4
Realign channel to flow under Span 2 and bypass northeast wingwall
II B
5
Install channel slope protection in front of Abutment 1
II B
6
Repair all open joints with backfill loss in northeast wingwall
III A
7
Repair spall that has exposed steel at third angle break of northeast wingwall cap
III A
8
Replace approach sidewalk sections at northeast approach
III C
9
Remove graffiti on structure underside
IV B
4,5
4,5
4,5
4,5
4,5
4,5
4,5
1,7
i
i
7
Bridae 775709
Pay Item
IDescription
I Unit
I Quantity
I Rate
I Total
Group II B
N/A
Sonar Device
EA
1
$ 25,000.00
$ 25,000.00
104 -11
Floating Turbidity Barrier
LF
568
$ 7.33
$ 4,163.44
110 -1 -1
Clearing & Grubbing
AC
0.46
$ 8,322.45
$ 3,828.33
120 -5
Channel Excavation
CY
746
$ 9.72
$ 7,251.12
514 -71 -1
Plastic Filter Fabric, Subsurface
SY
2238
$ 6.30
$ 14,099.40
530 -76 -4
lGabion Mat, 12" Thick
SY
2238
$ 320.00
$ 716,160.00
530 -77 -2
JGabion Basket, 36" Thick
SY
466
$ 95.00
$ 44,270.00
Sub -Total
$ 814,772.29
Group III A
401 -70 -5
Restore Spalled Areas, Contractor's Option
CF
3.0
$ 400.00
$ 1,200.00
411 -1
Epoxy material for Crack Injection - Structures
Rehab
GA
6
$ 141.67
$ 850.02
411 -2
Cracks Inject & Seal - Structures Rehab
LF
100
$ 46.69
$ 4,669.00
Sub -Total
$ 6,719.02
Group III C
142 -70
Fill Sand
CY
2
$ 49.83
$ 99.66
524 -2 -2
Concrete Slope Pavement, Non - Reinforced, 4"
SY
12
$ 102.10
$ 1,225.20
522 -1
Concrete Sidewalk and Driveways, 4" Thick
SY
12
$ 33.20
$ 398.40
Sub -Total
$ 1,723.26
Group IV
B
563 -4
Anti - Graffiti Coating, Non - Sacrificial
SF
3287
$ 0.95
$ 3,122.65
Sub -Total
$ 3,122.65
TOTAL
$ 826,337.22
S: \Work - Florida \City of Winter Springs \Excel \Bridge Repair Cost Estimates.xlsBrdg 775709
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
4
3,12
3,12
13
1,2
7,8
7,8
6,10
6,10
5
9
14
11
VOUCERT
Project No.: 453100.63
Description: Northern Way over Bear Creek
Designer: MME Date: 12.17.14
Inspector Recommendations
Repair delaminated patch at Slab Unit 1 -6
Repair spall in underside of Slab Unit 1 -9
Repair voids in slope protection at the ends of the northwest, southwest, and southeast retaining walls
Install under drains in voids at retaining walls to control erosion
Repair spall/delaminating patch on east end of northeast approach slab sidewalk
Fill and stabilize undermined northeast approach slab sidewalk
Repair diagonal crack at bottom face of northeast wingwall cap
Repair crack in northeast wingwall Pile 1
Rebuild settled northwest sidewalk at the northwest approach slab sidewalk
Repair undermined northeast sidewalk at approach transition/stabilize erosion on slope
Remove graffiti under structure
Repair erosion on northeast slope
Upgrade the guardrail transitions at the bridge barriers
Repair broken northwest PVC conduit
Bridae 775710
DESIGN COMPUTATIONS
Sheet No: of
Checker: MSL Date: 01.07.15
Priority
III A
III A
11
11
III C
III C
III A
III A
III C
III C
IV B
11
11
IV A
Pay Item
IDescription
I Unit
I Quantity
I Rate
I Total
Group II D
440 -1 -10
Underdrain, Type I
LF
20
$ 37.19
$ 743.80
142 -70
Fill Sand
CY
3
$ 49.83
$ 149.49
514 -71 -2
Plastic Filter Fabric, Stabilization
SY
6
$ 5.89
$ 35.34
536 -8
Guardrail Bridge Anchorage Assembly, Furnish
& Install
EA
4
$ 2,473.99
$ 9,895.96
Sub -Total
$ 10,824.59
Group
III
A
401 -70 -5
Restore Spalled Areas, Contractor's Option
CF
1.8
$ 400.00
$ 720.00
411 -1
Epoxy material for Crack Injection - Structures
Rehab
GA
1
$ 141.67
$ 141.67
411 -2
Cracks Inject & Seal - Structures Rehab
LF
7
$ 46.69
$ 326.83
Sub -Total
$ 1,188.50
Group
III C
142 -70
Fill Sand
CY
9
$ 49.83
$ 448.47
514 -71 -2
Plastic Filter Fabric, Stabilization
SY
26
$ 5.89
$ 153.14
401 -70 -5
Restore Spalled Areas, Contractor's Option
CF
0.5
$ 400.00
$ 200.00
522 -1
Concrete Sidewalk and Driveways, 4" Thick
SY
6
$ 33.20
$ 199.20
Sub -Total
$ 1,000.81
Group
IV A
1050 -11 -212
Utility Pipe, F &I, PVC, Casing /Conduit, 2 -4.9"
LF
10
$ 16.33
$ 163.30
Sub -Total
$ 163.30
Group IV B
563 -4
Anti - Graffiti Coating, Non - Sacrificial
SF
3276
$ 0.95
$ 3,112.20
Sub -Total
$ 3,112.20
TOTAL
$ 16,289.40
S: \Work - Florida \City of Winter Springs \Excel \Bridge Repair Cost Estimates.xlsBrdg 775710
VOLKERT
Project No.: 453100.63
Description: Winter Springs Blvd over Howell Creek
Designer: MME Date: 12.17.14
DESIGN COMPUTATIONS
Sheet No: of
Checker: MSL Date: 01.07.15
No. Inspector Recommendations Priority
1 Clean and paint exposed rebar at the right barrier in Span 2 and the left barrier at Span 3 III C
2 Remove loose concrete and clean and paint exposed rebar at the south haunch spalls at Bent 2 III A
3 Remove drift from the channel under the structure /realign the channel II B
4 Remove / paint over graffiti at the underside of the structure IV B
5 Replace all broken and missing reflectors at the northwest and northeast guardrails II D
6 Relocate the utility hanger a tree is growing into at south side of Span 2 near Bent 2 or remove tree II B
7 Cut back tree branches overhanging the bridge II B
8 Provide a relief joint at the northwest approach curb and approach slab interface III C
9 Remove loose concrete and repair spalled area at the northwest approach curb III C
3,6,7
3
5
2
1,9
8
4
Brda 775711
Pay Item
Description
Unit
Quantity
Rate
Total
Group II B
110 -1 -1
Clearing & Grubbing
AC
0.09
$ 8,322.45
$ 749.02
120 -5
Channel Excavation
CY
167
$ 9.72
$ 1,623.24
Sub -Total
$ 2,372.26
Group II D
536 -1 -1
Guardrail, Roadway
LF
100
$ 16.07
$ 1,607.00
Sub -Total
$ 1,607.00
Group III A
401 -70 -5
Restore Spalled Areas, Contractor's Option
CF
0.5
$ 400.00
$ 200.00
Sub -Total
$ 200.00
Group III C
401 -70 -5
Restore Spalled Areas, Contractor's Option
CF
0.2
$ 400.00
$ 80.00
458 -1 -21
Bridge Deck Expansion Joint, Rehabilitation,
Poured Joint with Backer Rod
LF
5
$ 56.16
$ 280.80
Sub -Total
$ 360.80
Group IV B
563 -4
Anti - Graffiti Coating, Non - Sacrificial
SF
6490
$ 0.95
$ 6,165.50
Sub -Total
$ 6,165.50
TOTAL
$ 10,705.56
S: \Work - Florida \City of Winter S pri ngs\Excel\B ridge Repair Cost Estimates.xlsBrdg 775711
VOLKERT
Project No.: 453100.63
Description: Winter Springs Blvd over Bear Creek
Designer: MME Date: 12.17.14
DESIGN COMPUTATIONS
Sheet No: of
Checker: MSL Date: 01.07.15
No.
Inspector Recommendations
Priority
1
Remove corrosion from the aluminum rail anchor fasteners and apply a protective coating
III C
2
Replace the missing anchor bolt nut at left Post 4
III C
3
Fill and stabilize Abutment 1 slope
II B
4
Install erosion countermeasures on the Abutment 1 slope
II B
5
Repair the spall in the north (left) curb at the west approach slab
III C
6
Replace fractured and settled sidewalk panels at the northwest approach
III C
7
Repair the void beneath the left approach sidewalk, west of the structure near the manhole
III C
8
Seal the gap at the northwest approach curb and approach sidewalk interface
III C
9
Repair the broken PVC conduit at the northeast corner of Abutment 3
IV A
3,4
3,4
3,4
3,4
1
2
5
6
7
7
8
8
Brda 775712
Pay Item
IDescription
I Unit
I Quantity
I Rate
I Total
Group
II B
104 -11
Floating Turbidity Barrier
LF
250
$ 7.33
$ 1,832.50
110 -1 -1
Clearing & Grubbing
AC
0.06
$ 8,322.45
$ 499.35
120 -5
Channel Excavation
CY
150
$ 9.72
$ 1,458.00
530 -3 -3
Rip Rap - Rubble, Bank and Shore
TN
220
$ 76.80
$ 16,896.00
Sub -Total
$ 20,685.85
Group III C
561 -2
Coating Existing Structural Steel
SF
11
$ 50.00
$ 550.00
460 -112
Anchor Bolt Replacement
EA
1
$ 621.33
$ 621.33
401 -70 -5
Restore Spalled Areas, Contractor's Option
CF
0.3
$ 400.00
$ 120.00
522 -1
Concrete Sidewalk and Driveways, 4" Thick
SY
6
$ 33.20
$ 199.20
142 -70
Fill Sand
CY
1
$ 49.83
$ 49.83
514 -71 -2
Plastic Filter Fabric, Stabilization
SY
1
$ 5.89
$ 5.89
411 -1
Epoxy material for Crack Injection - Structures
Rehab
GA
1
$ 141.67
$ 141.67
411 -2
Cracks Inject & Seal - Structures Rehab
LF
5
$ 46.69
$ 233.45
Sub -Total
$ 1,921.37
Group IV A
1050 -11 -212
Utility Pipe, F &I, PVC, Casing /Conduit, 2 -4.9"
LF
10
$ 16.33
$ 163.30
Sub -Total
$ 163.30
TOTAL
$ 22,770.52
S: \Work - Florida \City of Winter S pri ngs\Excel\B ridge Repair Cost Estimates.xlsBrdg 775712
Project No.: 453100.63
Description: Winding Hollow Blvd over Little Lake Howell Creek
Designer: MME Date: 12.17.14
DESIGN COMPUTATIONS
Sheet No: of
Checker: MSL Date: 01.07.15
No.
Inspector Recommendations
Priority
1
Replace the sealant in the sidewalks at both abutment expansion joints
III C
2
Remoove loose / spalled concrete and chain link fence post connections and repair /replace any loose or corroded anchor bolts
II D
3
Repair undermining of the fabri form mat toe along the north side of the channel
III C
4
Remoove loose concrete and repair spalls and delaminations at the south end of the southeast approach slab sidewalk
III C
5
Fill and stabilize undermining of the approach sidewalks at the southwest, southeast, northwest, and northeast approaches
III C
6
Repair the approach sidewalk panels to provide a smooth walking surface
III C
7
Remove / paint over graffiti on the west face of the west barrier
IV B
8
Replace guardrail Posts 10 and 12 at the southeast approach
II D
9
Protect guardrail posts to eliminate impact hazard for pedestrians
II D
10
Provide an object marker at the southeast approach
II D
2
2
8
9
10
1
3,5
3,5
4,6
Brdg 775713
Pay Item
Description
Unit
Quantity
Rate
Total
Group II D
460 -112
Anchor Bolt Replacement
EA
16
$ 621.33
$ 9,941.28
401 -70 -5
Restore Spalled Areas, Contractor's Option
CF
4.0
$ 400.00
$ 1,600.00
536 -83 -1
Guardrail Post Replacement, Regular
EA
2
$ 50.00
$ 100.00
515 -1 -1
Pipe Handrail - Guiderail, Steel
LF
300
$ 48.57
$ 14,571.00
705 -10 -3
Object Marker, Type 3
EA
1
$ 163.66
$ 163.66
Sub -Total
$ 26,375.94
Group III C
458 -1 -21
Bridge Deck Expansion Joint, Rehabilitation,
Poured Joint with Backer Rod
LF
20
$ 56.16
$ 1,123.20
142 -70
Fill Sand
CY
3
$ 49.83
$ 149.49
514 -71 -2
Plastic Filter Fabric, Stabilization
SY
13
$ 5.89
$ 76.57
401 -70 -5
Restore Spalled Areas, Contractor's Option
CF
0.3
$ 400.00
$ 120.00
Sub -Total
$ 1,469.26
Group IV B
563 -4
Anti - Graffiti Coating, Non - Sacrificial
SF
120
$ 0.95
$ 114.00
Sub -Total
$ 114.00
TOTAL
$ 27,959.20
S: \Work - Florida \City of Winter Springs \Excel \Bridge Repair Cost Estimate s.xlsBrdg 775713
VOLKERT
Project No.: 453100.63
Description: Hayes Rd over Gee Creek
Designer: MME Date: 12.17.14
DESIGN COMPUTATIONS
Sheet No: of
Checker: MSL Date: 01.07.15
No. Inspector Recommendations Priority
1 Clean and paint flat washers for the handrails base plate anchor bolts IV A
2 Fill and stabilize undermining southwest, northwest, and northeast approach sidewalks III C
3 Fill and stabilize the erosion behind the southwest, northwest, and northeast wingwalls III C
2,3
2,3
Bridge 775714
Pay Item
Description
Unit
Quantity
Rate
Total
Group III C
142 -70
Fill Sand
CY
17
$ 49.83
$ 847.11
514 -71 -2
Plastic Filter Fabric, Stabilization
SY
9
$ 5.89
$ 53.01
Sub -Total
$ 900.12
Group IV A
561 -2
Coating Existing Structural Steel
SF
6
$ 50.00
$ 300.00
Sub -Total
$ 300.00
TOTAL
$ 1,200.12
S: \Work - Florida \City of Winter S pri ngs\Excel\B ridge Repair Cost Estimates.xlsBrdg 775714
VOLKERT
Project No.: 453100.63
Description: Moss Road over Gee Creek
Designer: MME Date: 12.17.14
DESIGN COMPUTATIONS
Sheet No: of
Checker: MSL Date: 01.07.15
No.
Inspector Recommendations
Priority
1
Replace the missing anchor bolt at the left aluminum bicycle rail Post 10
II D
2
Tighten the anchor bolt nuts at left rail Posts 9, 10, and 11
II D
3
Repair the open joints at both fascias at the interfaces with the arches
III C
4
Repair the vertical cracks at the arch interfaces at both sides of the structure
III A
5
Clean and paint the exposed steel in the spall at the west end of Arch 2
III A
6
Remove loose concrete and repair delamination in the north end of the sidewalk
III C
7
Remove any unsound concrete and repair delaminations and failed repairs at the wingwall interfaces
III A
8
Fill and stabilize undermining of the southwest, northwest, and northeast approach sidewalks
III C
9
Replace one fractured sidewalk panel at the southwest approach
III C
10
Fill and stabilize the void between northeast guardrail Posts 2 and 3
II D
4
4
5,7
3
6
8
8
9
Brda 775715
Pay Item
Description
Unit
Quantity
Rate
Total
Group II D
460 -112
Anchor Bolt Replacement
EA
6
$ 621.33
$ 3,727.98
142 -70
Fill Sand
CY
1
$ 49.83
$ 49.83
514 -71 -2
Plastic Filter Fabric, Stabilization
SY
1
$ 5.89
$ 5.89
Sub -Total
$ 3,783.70
Group III A
411 -1
Epoxy material for Crack Injection - Structures
Rehab
GA
3
$ 141.67
$ 425.01
411 -2
Cracks Inject & Seal - Structures Rehab
LF
9
$ 46.69
$ 420.21
401 -70 -5
Restore Spalled Areas, Contractor's Option
CF
0.3
$ 400.00
$ 120.00
Sub -Total
$ 965.22
Group III C
400 -4 -1
Concrete Class IV, Culverts
CY
0.2
$ 1,285.83
$ 257.17
401 -70 -5
Restore Spalled Areas, Contractor's Option
CF
0.1
$ 400.00
$ 40.00
142 -70
Fill Sand
CY
1
$ 49.83
$ 49.83
514 -71 -2
Plastic Filter Fabric, Stabilization
SY
1
$ 5.89
$ 5.89
522 -1
Concrete Sidewalk and Driveways, 4" Thick
SY
3
$ 33.20
$ 99.60
Sub -Total
I
$ 452.49
TOTAL
$ 5,201.41
S: \Work - Florida \City of Winter S pri ngs\Excel\B ridge Repair Cost Estimates.xlsBrdg 775715
No
1
2
3
VOLKERT
Project No.: 453100.63
Description: Shore Road over Gee Creek
Designer: MME Date: 04.10.15
Inspector Recommendations
Clean and seal all culvert joints
Fill and stabilize along the west toe wall
Fill and stabilize the undecut area, northeast channel bank at the structure
Install erosion countermeasures east side of the structure to prevent undermining
DESIGN COMPUTATIONS
Sheet No: of
Checker: MSL Date: 04.15.15
Priority
III C
III C
III C
III C
Pay Item
IDescription
I Unit
I Quantity
Rate
Total
Group III C
411 -1
Epoxy material for Crack Injection - Structures
Rehab
GA
15
$ 141.67
$ 2,125.05
411 -2
Cracks Inject & Seal - Structures Rehab
LF
273
$ 46.69
$ 12,746.37
142 -70
Fill Sand
CY
2
$ 49.83
$ 99.66
514 -71 -2
Plastic Filter Fabric, Stabilization
SY
5
$ 5.89
$ 29.45
400 -4 -1
Concrete Class IV, Culverts
CY
0.7
$ 1,285.83
$ 900.08
530 -3 -4
Rip Rap - Rubble, F &I, Ditch Lining
TN
1.4
$ 81.99
$ 114.79
Sub -Total
$ 16,015.40
TOTAL
$ 16,015.40
S: \Work - Florida \City of Winter S pri ngs\Excel\B ridge Repair Cost Estimates.xlsShore Rd ovr Gee Creek
VOLKERT
Project No.: 453100.63
Description: Alton Road over Gee Creek
Designer: MME Date: 04.10.15
DESIGN COMPUTATIONS
Sheet No: of
Checker: MSL Date: 04.15.15
No. Inspector Recommendations Priority
1 Repair the crumbling south sidewalk over the structure III C
2 Remove dirt, vegetation, and trees restricting flow both channels III A
Pay Item
Description
Unit
Quantity
Rate
Total
Group III A
110 -1 -1
Clearing & Grubbing
AC
0.04
$ 8,322.45
$ 332.90
Sub -Total
$ 332.90
Group III C
522 -1
Concrete Sidewalk and Driveways, 4" Thick
SY
4
$ 33.20
$ 132.80
Sub -Total
$ 132.80
TOTAL
$ 465.70
S: \Work - Florida \City of Winter S pri ngs\Excel\B ridge Repair Cost Estimates.xlsAlton Rd ovr Gee Creek
VOLKERT
Project No.: 453100.63
Description: Costa Rica Drive over Gee Creek
Designer: MME Date: 04.10.15
DESIGN COMPUTATIONS
Sheet No: of
Checker: MSL Date: 04.15.15
No. Inspector Recommendations Priority
1 Install /replace any missing sand bags north channel under structure III C
2 Remove aluminum curtain walls to allow observation of the condition of the back walls III A
Pay Item
Description
Unit
Quantity
Rate
Total
Group III A
110 -3
Removal of Existing Structure
SF
281
$ 21.91
$ 6,156.71
Sub -Total
$ 6,156.71
Group III C
142 -70
Fill Sand
CY
5
$ 49.83
$ 249.15
514 -71 -2
Plastic Filter Fabric, Stabilization
SY
7
$ 5.89
$ 41.23
530 -1
Rip Rap, Sand - Cement
CY
4.5
$ 559.84
$ 2,519.28
Sub -Total
$ 2,809.66
TOTAL
$ 8,966.37
S: \Work - Florida \City of Winter S pri ngs\Excel\B ridge Repair Cost Estimates.xlsCosta Rica Dr ovr Gee Creek
APPENDIX C
FDOT
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
TRANSPORTATION COSTS REPORTS
Bridge Costs
A highway bridge is defined as any span of 20 feet or more in length. Not all bridges go over
bodies of water. Overpasses and ramps that are part of highway interchanges are bridges too.
A large proportion of the statewide highway construction budget, usually in excess of 20 %, is
devoted to bridge construction. Typically, the FDOT completes between 100 and 200 bridges
each year. As a rule of thumb, bridges from 20 to 45 feet in length are short span bridges.
Bridges from 45 to 150 feet are medium span bridges, and those extending over 150 feet are
long span bridges.
In recent years, the overall trend has been an increase in bridge construction costs. However, a
few categories of costs have decreased. These estimates, based on FDOT experience, are only
provided for use in preliminary planning, and should not be used as a substitute for detailed
engineering estimates.
New Construction
(Cost per Square Foot)
Bridge Type
Low
High
Short Span Bridges:
Reinforced Concrete Flat Slab Simple Span*
$115
$160
Pre -cast Concrete Slab Simple Span*
$110
$200
Reinforced Concrete Flat Slab Continuous Span*
NA
NA
Medium and Long Span Bridges:
Concrete Deck/ Steel Girder - Simple Span*
$125
$142
Concrete Deck/ Steel Girder - Continuous Span*
$135
$170
Concrete Deck/ Pre - stressed Girder - Simple Span
$90
$145
Concrete Deck/ Pre - stressed Girder - Continuous Span
$95
$211
Concrete Deck/ Steel Box Girder — Span Range from 150' to 280' (for
curvature, add a 15% premium)
$140
$180
Segmental Concrete Box Girders - Cantilever Construction, Span Range
from 150' to 280'
$140
$160
Movable Bridge - Bascule Spans and Piers
$1,800
$2,000
* Increase the cost by twenty percent for phased construction.
http: / /www.dot.state.f1.us /planning /policy /costs April 29, 2014
FDOT Li FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
TRANSPORTATION COSTS REPORTS
Bridge Demolition and Widening
(Cost per Square Foot)
Bridge Demolition:
Low
High
Typical Bridge Removal
$35
$60
Movable Span Bridge (Bascule)
$60
$70
Widening:
Bridge Widening Construction
$85
$160
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:
Structures Design Guidelines, FDOT Structures Manual, Volume 1, January 2014
http: / /www.dot.state.fl. us/ structures/ StructuresManual /CurrentRelease /Vol1 SDG.pdf
CONTACT:
Martin Markovich, Office of Policy Planning (850) 414 -4918, martin .markovich(a) dot. state. fl. us
http: / /www.dot.state.f1.us /planning /policy /costs April 29, 2014
VOLKERT
DESIGN COMPUTATIONS
Job No.: 453100.63 Sheet No: of
Description: Bridge Master Plan
Designer: MME Date: 12.16.14 Checker: MSL Date: 01.07.15
BRIDGE REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE
Facility Carried
Facility Intersected
Northern Way South Loop
Howell Creek
Bridge No.: 775703
EXISTING DIMENSIONS
Total Bridge Length
46.2
Out to Out Width
35.2
REPLACEMENT DIMENSIONS
Total Bridge Length
46.2
Out to Out Width
44.0
REPLACEMENT DECK AREAS
SQ. FT.
Unit Price Cost
Deck Area
2032.8
$125 $254,100
Demolition
1626.24
$35 $56,918
Bridge Cost Subtotal:
$311,018
Utilities @ 5%
$15,551
Roadway @ 10%
$31,102
Subtotal:
$357,671
MOT @ 10%
$35,767
Mobilization @ 10%
$39,344
Subtotal:
$432,782
Contigency @ 30%
$129,835
Total Construction Cost:
$562,617
Design @ 15%
$84,393
CEI @ 15%
$84,393
GRAND TOTAL
$731,402
VOLKERT
DESIGN COMPUTATIONS
Job No.: 453100.63 Sheet No: of
Description: Bridge Master Plan
Designer: MME Date: 12.16.14 Checker: MSL Date: 01.07.15
BRIDGE REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE
Facility Carried
Facility Intersected
Murphy Rd
Gee Creek
Bridge No.: 775704
EXISTING DIMENSIONS
Total Bridge Length
41.3
Out to Out Width
40.0
REPLACEMENT DIMENSIONS
Total Bridge Length
41.3
Out to Out Width
44.0
REPLACEMENT DECK AREAS
SQ. FT.
Unit Price Cost
Deck Area
1817.2
$140 $254,408
Demolition
1652
$35 $57,820
Bridge Cost Subtotal:
$312,228
Utilities @ 5%
$15,611
Roadway @ 10%
$31,223
Subtotal:
$359,062
MOT @ 10%
$35,906
Mobilization @ 10%
$39,497
Subtotal:
$434,465
Contigency @ 30%
$130,340
Total Construction Cost:
$564,805
Design @ 15%
$84,721
CEI @ 15%
$84,721
GRAND TOTAL
$734,246
VOLKERT
DESIGN COMPUTATIONS
Job No.: 453100.63 Sheet No: of
Description: Bridge Master Plan
Designer: MME Date: 12.16.14 Checker: MSL Date: 01.07.15
BRIDGE REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE
Facility Carried
Facility Intersected
South Edgemon Ave
Gee Creek
Bridge No.: 775705
EXISTING DIMENSIONS
Total Bridge Length
37.4
Out to Out Width
37.0
REPLACEMENT DIMENSIONS
Total Bridge Length
37.4
Out to Out Width
44.0
REPLACEMENT DECK AREAS
SQ. FT.
Unit Price Cost
Deck Area
1645.6
$140 $230,384
Demolition
1383.8
$35 $48,433
Bridge Cost Subtotal:
$278,817
Utilities @ 5%
$13,941
Roadway @ 10%
$27,882
Subtotal:
$320,640
MOT @ 10%
$32,064
Mobilization @ 10%
$35,270
Subtotal:
$387,974
Contigency @ 30%
$116,392
Total Construction Cost:
$504,366
Design @ 15%
$75,655
CEI @ 15%
$75,655
GRAND TOTAL
$655,676
VOLKERT
DESIGN COMPUTATIONS
Job No.: 453100.63 Sheet No: of
Description: Bridge Master Plan
Designer: MME Date: 12.16.14 Checker: MSL Date: 01.07.15
BRIDGE REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE
Facility Carried
Facility Intersected
Sheoah Blvd
Sheoah Creek
Bridge No.: 775707
EXISTING DIMENSIONS
Total Bridge Length
45.3
Out to Out Width
34.6
REPLACEMENT DIMENSIONS
Total Bridge Length
45.3
Out to Out Width
44.0
REPLACEMENT DECK AREAS
SQ. FT.
Unit Price Cost
Deck Area
1993.2
$125 $249,150
Demolition
1567.38
$35 $54,858
Bridge Cost Subtotal:
$304,008
Utilities @ 5%
$15,200
Roadway @ 10%
$30,401
Subtotal:
$349,610
MOT @ 10%
$34,961
Mobilization @ 10%
$38,457
Subtotal:
$423,028
Contigency @ 30%
$126,908
Total Construction Cost:
$549,936
Design @ 15%
$82,490
CEI @ 15%
$82,490
GRAND TOTAL
$714,917
VOLKERT
DESIGN COMPUTATIONS
Job No.: 453100.63 Sheet No: of
Description: Bridge Master Plan
Designer: MME Date: 12.16.14 Checker: MSL Date: 01.07.15
BRIDGE REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE
Facility Carried
Facility Intersected
Shepard Rd
Sheoah Creek
Bridge No.: 775708
EXISTING DIMENSIONS
Total Bridge Length
45.6
Out to Out Width
34.6
REPLACEMENT DIMENSIONS
Total Bridge Length
45.6
Out to Out Width
44.0
REPLACEMENT DECK AREAS
SQ. FT.
Unit Price Cost
Deck Area
2006.4
$125 $250,800
Demolition
1577.76
$35 $55,222
Bridge Cost Subtotal:
$306,022
Utilities @ 5%
$15,301
Roadway @ 10%
$30,602
Subtotal:
$351,925
MOT @ 10%
$35,192
Mobilization @ 10%
$38,712
Subtotal:
$425,829
Contigency @ 30%
$127,749
Total Construction Cost:
$553,578
Design @ 15%
$83,037
CEI @ 15%
$83,037
GRAND TOTAL
$719,651
VOLKERT
DESIGN COMPUTATIONS
Job No.: 453100.63 Sheet No: of
Description: Bridge Master Plan
Designer: MME Date: 12.16.14 Checker: MSL Date: 01.07.15
BRIDGE REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE
Facility Carried
Facility Intersected
Northern Way North Loop
Howell Creek
Bridge No.: 775709
EXISTING DIMENSIONS
Total Bridge Length
90.3
Out to Out Width
36.4
REPLACEMENT DIMENSIONS
Total Bridge Length
90.3
Out to Out Width
44.0
REPLACEMENT DECK AREAS
SQ. FT.
Unit Price Cost
Deck Area
3973.2
$125 $496,650
Demolition
3286.92
$35 $115,042
Bridge Cost Subtotal:
$611,692
Utilities @ 5%
$30,585
Roadway @ 10%
$61,169
Subtotal:
$703,446
MOT @ 10%
$70,345
Mobilization @ 10%
$77,379
Subtotal:
$851,170
Contigency @ 30%
$255,351
Total Construction Cost:
$1,106,521
Design @ 15%
$165,978
CEI @ 15%
$165,978
GRAND TOTAL
$1,438,477
VOLKERT
DESIGN COMPUTATIONS
Job No.: 453100.63 Sheet No: of
Description: Bridge Master Plan
Designer: MME Date: 12.16.14 Checker: MSL Date: 01.07.15
BRIDGE REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE
Facility Carried
Facility Intersected
Northern Way
Bear Creek
Bridge No.: 775710
EXISTING DIMENSIONS
Total Bridge Length
90
Out to Out Width
36.4
REPLACEMENT DIMENSIONS
Total Bridge Length
90
Out to Out Width
44.0
REPLACEMENT DECK AREAS
SQ. FT.
Unit Price Cost
Deck Area
3960
$125 $495,000
Demolition
3276
$35 $114,660
Bridge Cost Subtotal:
$609,660
Utilities @ 5%
$30,483
Roadway @ 10%
$60,966
Subtotal:
$701,109
MOT @ 10%
$70,111
Mobilization @ 10%
$77,122
Subtotal:
$848,342
Contigency @ 30%
$254,503
Total Construction Cost:
$1,102,844
Design @ 15%
$165,427
CEI @ 15%
$165,427
GRAND TOTAL
$1,433,698
VOLKERT
DESIGN COMPUTATIONS
Job No.: 453100.63 Sheet No: of
Description: Bridge Master Plan
Designer: MME Date: 12.16.14 Checker: MSL Date: 01.07.15
BRIDGE REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE
Facility Carried
Facility Intersected
Winter Springs Blvd
Howell Creek
Bridge No.: 775711
EXISTING DIMENSIONS
Total Bridge Length
135.5
Out to Out Width
47.9
REPLACEMENT DIMENSIONS
Total Bridge Length
135.5
Out to Out Width
47.9
min.
REPLACEMENT DECK AREAS
SQ. FT.
Unit Price Cost
Deck Area
6490.45
$125 $811,306
Demolition
6490.45
$35 $227,166
Bridge Cost Subtotal:
$1,038,472
Utilities @ 5%
$51,924
Roadway @ 10%
$103,847
Subtotal:
$1,194,243
MOT @ 10%
$119,424
Mobilization @ 10%
$131,367
Subtotal:
$1,445,034
Contigency @ 30%
$433,510
Total Construction Cost:
$1,878,544
Design @ 15%
$281,782
CEI @ 15%
$281,782
GRAND TOTAL
$2,442,107
VOLKERT
DESIGN COMPUTATIONS
Job No.: 453100.63 Sheet No: of
Description: Bridge Master Plan
Designer: MME Date: 12.16.14 Checker: MSL Date: 01.07.15
BRIDGE REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE
Facility Carried
Facility Intersected
Winter Springs Blvd
Bear Creek
Bridge No.: 775712
EXISTING DIMENSIONS
Total Bridge Length
70
Out to Out Width
51.7
REPLACEMENT DIMENSIONS
Total Bridge Length
70
Out to Out Width
51.7
min.
REPLACEMENT DECK AREAS
SQ. FT.
Unit Price Cost
Deck Area
3619
$125 $452,375
Demolition
3619
$35 $126,665
Bridge Cost Subtotal:
$579,040
Utilities @ 5%
$28,952
Roadway @ 10%
$57,904
Subtotal:
$665,896
MOT @ 10%
$66,590
Mobilization @ 10%
$73,249
Subtotal:
$805,734
Contigency @ 30%
$241,720
Total Construction Cost:
$1,047,454
Design @ 15%
$157,118
CEI @ 15%
$157,118
GRAND TOTAL
$1,361,691
VOLKERT
DESIGN COMPUTATIONS
Job No.: 453100.63 Sheet No: of
Description: Bridge Master Plan
Designer: MME Date: 12.16.14 Checker: MSL Date: 01.07.15
BRIDGE REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE
Facility Carried
Facility Intersected
Winding Hollow Blvd
Little Lake Howell Creek
Bridge No.: 775713
EXISTING DIMENSIONS
Total Bridge Length
40.0
Out to Out Width
40.5
REPLACEMENT DIMENSIONS
Total Bridge Length
40.0
Out to Out Width
50.0
REPLACEMENT DECK AREAS
SQ. FT. Unit Price Cost
Deck Area
2000 $125 $250,000
Demolition
1620 $35 $56,700
Bridge Cost Subtotal:
$306,700
Utilities @ 5%
$15,335
Roadway @ 10%
$30,670
Subtotal:
$352,705
MOT @ 10%
$35,271
Mobilization @ 10%
$38,798
Subtotal:
$426,773
Contigency @ 30%
$128,032
Total Construction Cost:
$554,805
Design @ 15%
$83,221
CEI @ 15%
$83,221
GRAND TOTAL
$721,246
VOLKERT
DESIGN COMPUTATIONS
Job No.: 453100.63 Sheet No: of
Description: Bridge Master Plan
Designer: MME Date: 12.16.14 Checker: MSL Date: 01.07.15
BRIDGE REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE
Facility Carried
Facility Intersected
Hayes Rd
Gee Creek
Bridge No.: 775714
EXISTING DIMENSIONS
Total Bridge Length
28.0
Out to Out Width
48.0
REPLACEMENT DIMENSIONS
Total Bridge Length
28.0
Out to Out Width
50.0
REPLACEMENT DECK AREAS
SQ. FT.
Unit Price Cost
Deck Area
1400
$140 $196,000
Demolition
1344
$35 $47,040
Bridge Cost Subtotal:
$243,040
Utilities @ 5%
$12,152
Roadway @ 10%
$24,304
Subtotal:
$279,496
MOT @ 10%
$27,950
Mobilization @ 10%
$30,745
Subtotal:
$338,190
Contigency @ 30%
$101,457
Total Construction Cost:
$439,647
Design @ 15%
$65,947
CEI @ 15%
$65,947
GRAND TOTAL
$571,541
VOLKERT
DESIGN COMPUTATIONS
Job No.: 453100.63 Sheet No: of
Description: Bridge Master Plan
Designer: MME Date: 12.16.14 Checker: MSL Date: 01.07.15
BRIDGE REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE
Facility Carried
Facility Intersected
Moss Rd
Gee Creek
Bridge No.: 775715
EXISTING DIMENSIONS
Total Bridge Length
49.5
Out to Out Width
41.0
REPLACEMENT DIMENSIONS
Total Bridge Length
49.5
Out to Out Width
50.0
REPLACEMENT DECK AREAS
SQ. FT.
Unit Price Cost
Deck Area
2475
$140 $346,500
Demolition
2029.5
$35 $71,033
Bridge Cost Subtotal:
$417,533
Utilities @ 5%
$20,877
Roadway @ 10%
$41,753
Subtotal:
$480,162
MOT @ 10%
$48,016
Mobilization @ 10%
$52,818
Subtotal:
$580,996
Contigency @ 30%
$174,299
Total Construction Cost:
$755,295
Design @ 15%
$113,294
CEI @ 15%
$113,294
GRAND TOTAL
$981,884
VOLKERT
DESIGN COMPUTATIONS
Job No.: 453100.63 Sheet No: of
Description: Bridge Master Plan
Designer: MME Date: 04.10.15 Checker: MSL Date: 04.13.15
BRIDGE REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE
Facility Carried
Facility Intersected
Shore Rd
Gee Creek
Bridge
No.: N/A
EXISTING DIMENSIONS
Total Bridge Length
19.1
Out to Out Width
90.1
REPLACEMENT DIMENSIONS
Total Bridge Length
19.1
Out to Out Width
90.1
REPLACEMENT DECK AREAS
SQ. FT.
Unit Price Cost
Deck Area
1720.91
$80 $137,673
Demolition
1720.91
$35 $60,232
Bridge Cost Subtotal:
$197,905
Utilities @ 5%
$9,895
Roadway @ 10%
$19,790
Subtotal:
$227,590
MOT @ 10%
$22,759
Mobilization @ 10%
$25,035
Subtotal:
$275,384
Contigency @ 30%
$82,615
Total Construction Cost:
$358,000
Design @ 15%
$53,700
CEI @ 15%
$53,700
GRAND TOTAL
$465,400
VOLKERT
DESIGN COMPUTATIONS
Job No.: 453100.63 Sheet No: of
Description: Bridge Master Plan
Designer: MME Date: 04.10.15 Checker: MSL Date: 04.13.15
BRIDGE REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE
Facility Carried
Facility Intersected
Alton Rd
Gee Creek
Bridge
No.: N/A
EXISTING DIMENSIONS
Total Bridge Length
19.7
Out to Out Width
91.5
REPLACEMENT DIMENSIONS
Total Bridge Length
19.7
Out to Out Width
91.5
REPLACEMENT DECK AREAS
SQ. FT.
Unit Price Cost
Deck Area
1802.55
$80 $144,204
Demolition
1802.55
$35 $63,089
Bridge Cost Subtotal:
$207,293
Utilities @ 5%
$10,365
Roadway @ 10%
$20,729
Subtotal:
$238,387
MOT @ 10%
$23,839
Mobilization @ 10%
$26,223
Subtotal:
$288,449
Contigency @ 30%
$86,535
Total Construction Cost:
$374,983
Design @ 15%
$56,247
CEI @ 15%
$56,247
GRAND TOTAL
$487,478
VOLKERT
DESIGN COMPUTATIONS
Job No.: 453100.63 Sheet No: of
Description: Bridge Master Plan
Designer: MME Date: 04.10.15 Checker: MSL Date: 04.13.15
BRIDGE REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE
Facility Carried
Facility Intersected
Costa Rica Dr
Gee Creek
Bridge
No.: N/A
EXISTING DIMENSIONS
Total Bridge Length
29.3
Out to Out Width
28.1
REPLACEMENT DIMENSIONS
Total Bridge Length
29.3
Out to Out Width
28.1
REPLACEMENT DECK AREAS
SQ. FT.
Unit Price Cost
Deck Area
823.33
$125 $102,916
Demolition
823.33
$35 $28,817
Bridge Cost Subtotal:
$131,733
Utilities @ 5%
$6,587
Roadway @ 10%
$13,173
Subtotal:
$151,493
MOT @ 10%
$15,149
Mobilization @ 10%
$16,664
Subtotal:
$183,306
Contigency @ 30%
$54,992
Total Construction Cost:
$238,298
Design @ 15%
$35,745
CEI @ 15%
$35,745
GRAND TOTAL
$309,787
APPENDIX D
TOTALANNUAL
WORK PRIORITY - REPAIR COSTS
EMERGENCY
URGENT
ROUTINE
INFORMATIONAL
BRIDGE NUMBER
IA
IB
IC
IIA
IIB
IIC
IID
IIIA
IIIB
IIIC
IVA
IVB
Repair Total
years >>
1
1
1
2
3
3
3
8
10
775703
$842
$3,987
$1,546
$6,375
775704
$1,500
$3,880
$1,457
$6,837
775705
$1,100
$80
$16
$1,196
775707
$1,300
$4,167
$1,141
$6,608
775708
$1,600
$206
$1,806
775709
$814,772
$6,719
$1,723
$3,123
$826,337
775710
$10,825
$1,189
$1,001
$163
$3,112
$16,290
775711
$2,372
$1,607
$200
$361
$6,166
$10,706
775712
$20,686
$1,921
$163
$22,770
775713
$26,376
$1,469
$114
$27,959
775714
$900
$300
$1,200
775715
$3,784
$965
$452
$5,201
SHORE RD OVER GEE CREEK
$16,015
$16,015
ALTON RD OVER GEE CREEK
$333
$133
$466
COSTA RICA DR OVER GEE CREEK
$6,157
$2,810
$8,967
BASIC REPAIR SUBTOTALS
$0
$0
$0
$0
$837,830
$0
$48,092
$20,365
$0
$36,618
$1,767
$14,061
$958,733
MOBILIZATION (10%):
$0
$0
$0
$0
$83,783
$0
$4,809
$2,037
$0
$3,662
$177
$1,406
$95,873
MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC (10%):
$0
$0
$0
$0
$83,783
$0
$4,809
$2,037
$0
$3,662
$177
$1,406
$95,873
CONTIGENCIES(50 %)
$0
$0
$0
$0
$418,915
$0
$24,046
$10,183
$0
$18,309
$884
$7,031
$479,367
PRICE ESCALLATION (10 %)
$0
$0
$0
$0
$83,783
$0
$4,809
$2,037
$0
$3,662
$177
$1,406
$95,873
DESIGN (15 %)
$0
$0
$0
$0
$125,675
$0
$7,214
$3,055
$0
$5,493
$265
$2,109
$143,810
CEI (15 %)
$0
$0
$0
$0
$125,675
$0
$7,214
$3,055
$0
$5,493
$265
$2,109
$143,810
REPAIR TOTALS
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,759,443
$0
$100,993
$42,767
$0
$76,898
$3,711
$29,528
$2,013,339
AVERAGE ANNUAL AMOUNTS
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,759,443
$0
$50,497
$14,256
$0
$25,633
$464
$2,953
$1,853,244
TOTALANNUAL
APPENDIX E
REPLACEMENT YEARS
Structure #
Facility Carried
Envir. &
Feature Intersected Str Type Str Eval Environ Yr Built / Rehab Init Repl Yr Str Type Str Eval Repl Yr
Yrs to Repl
775703
Northern Way
South Loop
Howell Creek
522
4
fresh water
1973
2048
0
-25
2023
8
775704
Murphy Rd
Gee Creek
119
7
fresh water
1973
2048
0
0
2048
33
775705
South Edgemon Ave
Gee Creek
119
7
fresh water
1973
2048
0
0
2048
33
775707
Sheoah Blvd
Sheoah Creek
501
7
fresh water
1972
2047
0
0
2047
32
775708
Shepard Rd
Sheoah Creek
501
5
fresh water
1972
2047
0
-10
2037
22
775709
Northern Way
North Loop
Howell Creek
501
6
fresh water
1981
2056
0
-5
2051
36
775710
Northern Way
Bear Creek
501
7
fresh water
1981
2056
0
0
2056
41
775711
Winter Springs Blvd
Howell Creek
501
7
fresh water
1982
2057
0
0
2057
42
775712
Winter Springs Blvd
Bear Creek
501
7
fresh water
1987
2062
0
0
2062
47
775713
Winding Hollow Blvd
Little Lake Howell Creek
501
7
fresh water
1995
2070
0
0
2070
55
775714
Hayes Rd
Gee Creek
119
7
Ifresh water
1997
2072
0
1 0
2072
57
775715
Moss Rd
Gee Creek
119
7
fresh water
1998
2073
0
0
2073
58
N/A
Shore Rd
Gee Creek
119
8
fresh water
1979
2054
0
0
2054
39
N/A
Alton Rd
Gee Creek
119
8
fresh water
1973
2048
0
0
2048
33
N/A
Costa Rica Dr
Gee Creek
504
8
fresh water
1973
2048
0
0
1 2048
33
S: \Work - Florida \City of Winter Springs \Excel \[Bridge Replacement Annualized Costs. xls]Replacement Years
ANNUALIZED REPLACEMENT COSTS
Structure #
Facility Carried
Re pi Yr
Yrs to Re pi
Re pi Cost 2015
All Br id es
775703
Northern Way
South Loop
2023
8
$731,402
$91,425
775704
Murphy Rd
2048
33
$734,246
$22,250
775705
South Ed emon Ave
2048
33
$655,676
$19,869
775707
Sheoah Blvd
2047
32
$714,917
$22,341
775708
Shepard Rd
2037
22
$719,651
$32,711
775709
Northern Way
North Loo
2051
36
$1,438,477
$39,958
775710
Northern Way
2056
41
$1,433,698
$34,968
775711
Winter Springs Blvd
2057
42
$2,442,107
$58,145
775712
Winter Springs Blvd
2062
47
$1,361,691
$28,972
775713
Winding Hollow Blvd
2070
55
$721,246
$13,114
775714
Hayes Rd
2072
57
$571,541
$10,027
775715
Moss Rd
2073
58
$981,884
$16,929
N/A
Shore Rd
2054
39
$465,400
$11,933
N/A
Alton Rd
2048
33
$487,478
$14,772
N/A
Costa Rica Dr
2048
33
$309,787
$9,387
Totals
$13,769,201
$426,803
S: \Work - Florida \City of Winter Springs \Excel \[Bridge Replacement Annualized Costs.xls] Replacement Years