Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013 10 02 Public Hearing 501 Plante Large Scale Plan Amendment LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY AGENDA ITEM 501 Consent Information Public Hearing X Regular October 2, 2013 Meeting REQUEST: The Community Development Department — Planning Division requests that the Local Planning Agency hold a Public Hearing to consider Ordinance 2013-13, a Large-Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment, Expedited State Review (14-1 ESR), which proposes to change the Future Land Use Map designation for nine (9) parcels totaling approximately 60 gross acres of property currently within Seminole County, Florida from "Industrial" to the City of Winter Springs "Town Center". In addition, staff recommends placing the subject property within TCEA Zone A and simultaneously updating the existing TCEA Zone A Map to reflect said change. The subject property is generally located south of State Road 434 and east of Tuskawilla Road PURPOSE: The City of Winter Springs Community Development Department received an application for a Large-Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment, Expedited State Review (14-1), which if approved would change the Future Land Use Map designation for nine (9) parcels totaling approximately 60 gross acres of property currently within Seminole County, Florida from "Industrial" to the City of Winter Springs "Town Center". The subject property is generally located south of State Road 434 and east of Tuskawilla Road (see Attachment A - Location Map). The requested Large-Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment is a companion to a proposed Annexation (Ordinance 2013-12) and Rezoning (Ordinance 2013-15) request. APPLICABLE LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY Florida Statute 163.3174 (4): The Local Planning Agency shall have the general responsibility for the conduct of the comprehensive planning program. Specifically, the Local Planning Agency shall: (a) Be the agency responsible for the preparation of the comprehensive plan or plan amendment and shall make recommendations to the governing body regarding the adoption or amendment of such plan... October 2, 2013 Public Hearing Agenda Item 501 Page 12 (b) Monitor and oversee the effectiveness and status of the comprehensive plan and recommend to the governing body such changes in the comprehensive plan as may from time to time be required... Florida Statute 163.3187 Amendment of adopted comprehensive plan; Florida Statute 166.041 Procedures for adoption of ordinances and resolutions; Winter Springs Charter Section 4.15 Ordinances in General; Winter Springs Article III. Comprehensive Plan Amendments; Section 15-30. Authority, purpose and intent; Section 15-35. Review Procedure; Section 15-36. Review criteria; Section 15-37. Local Planning Agency Review and Recommendation: Prior to the City Commission's consideration of the application, the Local Planning Agency shall consider the application(s) at a Public Hearing, along with the staff review board's recommendation, and recommend that the City Commission approve, approve with modifications (text only), or deny the application for transmittal to the Department of Economic Opportunity. At a minimum, the Local Planning Agency shall consider the same factors considered by the staff review board. The LPA shall hold at least one (1) public hearing prior to making its recommendation to the City Commission. CONSIDERATIONS: Applicant Name and Address: Standard Pacific of Florida GP, Inc. 558 West New England Avenue Suite 250 Winter Park, F132789 Property Owner: L.D. Plante Inc. P.O. Box 151117 Altamonte Springs, F132715 Property Address: None Property Parcel ID'S: 06-21-31-501-OA00-0000 06-21-31-501-01300-0000 26-20-30-5AR-OA00-008G 26-20-30-5AR-OA00-008C 06-21-31-501-0200-0000 06-21-31-501-OP00-0000 26-20-30-5AR-OA00-0080 01-21-30-501-0000-0340 01-21-30-501-0000-0170 October 2, 2013 Public Hearing Agenda Item 501 Page 13 Future Land Use Desi n' ation: Seminole County: "Industrial" Proposed Future Land Use Desi n ation: City of Winter Springs: "Town Center" Zoning Designation: Seminole County: Agriculture "A-1" & Industrial "M-1" Proposed Zoning Desi n ation: City of Winter Springs: "Town Center" Approved Development Permits: None Pending Code Enforcement Actions: None City Liens: None Existing Land Uses — The subject site is located east of Tuskawilla Road and south of State Road 434. More specifically, the surrounding area is generally characterized by existing cattle grazing, public/semi-public uses, low and medium density residential, and an office park located on Tuskawilla Road. The subject properties are currently designated "Industrial" on the Seminole County Future Land Use Map and Agriculture "A-1" & Industrial "M-1" on the Seminole County Zoning Map. Properties east and south of the subject property are within the City of Winter Springs and located within the Tuscawilla Planned Unit Development (PUD). Life Community Church, located just south of the subject property, is currently within the City and fronts directly on Tuskawilla Road. There are a few existing single-family residences located just east of the subject property that are within the Tuscawilla Planned Unit Development (PUD). Presently there's approximately 56 acres of vacant property within the City, located south of the subject property, that is scheduled to become part of the overall development. Properties to the west are within both the City of Winter Springs and Seminole County. Both the Tuskawilla Office Park and the neo traditional Avery Park subdivision, located west of Tuskawilla Road, are currently within the City of Winter Springs Town Center. Just to the north of Avery Park, there are a few single-family residences located within Seminole County. Properties to the north are presently vacant and within the City of Winter Springs Town Center. Adjacent existing land uses, zoning and future land use designations include the following: October 2, 2013 Public Hearing Agenda Item 501 Page 14 Existing Land Uses Zoning Future Land Use Subject Few Existing Seminole County: Seminole County: Properties Buildings, Vacant Agriculture "A-1" Industrial Property & Industrial "M-1" North Vacant City of Winter City of Winter Springs: Springs: Town Center Town Center ............................................................................... South Vacant Property, City of Winter City of Winter Springs: Community Life Springs: Low Density Church PUD Residential; Public/Semi-Public ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ East Tuscawilla PUD City of Winter City of Winter Springs: Springs: Low Density PUD Residential ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ West Winter Springs Office City of Winter City of Winter Springs: Park, Avery Park, Springs: Town Center; Single-Family Town Center Residential within (T-4); Seminole County: Seminole County Medium Density Seminole County: Residential Agriculture "A-1" Development Trends — The subject property as it currently exists is an enclave with approximately 60 acres, more or less, within the jurisdiction of Seminole County. The property is mostly undeveloped and has recently been utilized for cattle grazing/agricultural pursuits. The vacant property is currently owned by L.D. Plante, Inc. and was formally owned by Central Florida Drum (CFD), a refurbishing and supply business from 1965 to 1986. From 1991 to 1998 the site was leased to Polymetrics, Inc. a manufacturer and supplier of industrial paints. Incorporating the subject property into the City of Winter Springs will eliminate the existing enclave and advance the City's vision for the Town Center. Proposed Future Land Use Classification — The proposed Large-Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment proposes to change the Future Land Use Map designation from the Seminole County "Industrial' designation to the City of Winter Springs "Town Center" designation (see Attachment B - Ordinance 2013-13). The requested "Town Center" future land use designation currently has no maximum density/intensity limitation. The applicant desires to combine the nine (9) county parcels with approximately 56 contiguous acres to the south, presently within the City of Winter Springs, for future development. October 2, 2013 Public Hearing Agenda Item 501 Page 15 Conceptually, the proposed development is for 450 residential units and 45,000 square feet of non-residential development. The proposed development yields a total 3.87 units per acre (see Attachment C - Conceptual Plan). To help evaluate the anticipated impact of said development, the applicant has agreed to enter into a Developer's Agreement hereby limiting the maximum density of said project to no more than four (4) units per gross acre. Staff anticipates the Developer's Agreement to be reviewed by City Commission at the time of Second Reading/Adoption which is scheduled to occur on January 27, 2014. Letters/Phone Calls In Favor Or Opposition — To date, the City has not received any letters or phone calls in favor or opposition. In accordance with Policy 2.1.2., Future Land Use Element, the City hosted a Design Charette for the proposed development on May 2, 2013. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT ANALYSIS: The following summarizes the data and issues which staff analyzed in reviewing this application: Justification for Future Land Use Designation - The requested Large-Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment proposes to change the Future Land Use Map designation from "Industrial" to "Town Center" for approximately 60 gross acres, more or less, currently within Seminole County, Florida, and generally located south of State Road 434 and east of Tuskawilla Road. The proposed use and density is compatible with the surrounding area, as it generally characterized by low and medium density residential, commercial, and public/semi-public development patterns. Public Facilities: ROADS/TRAFFIC CIRCULATION: Tuskawilla Road and State Road 434 are both four (4) lane arterial facilities that are currently operating at or above level of service B. Level of Service B is defined as a condition of road performance where traffic density is low and vehicles travel with operating speeds somewhat restricted by other vehicles. Drivers still have reasonable freedom to select their speeds. Availability of Access: Preliminary access lane configuration for the project access points are: • Main entrance at Tuskawilla Road - One (1) right only egress lane and one (1) ingress lane • Michael Blake Blvd at Tuskawilla Road - One (1) right only and one (1) shared left through egress lanes, one (1) ingress lane • Gardena Ave at State Road 434 - One (1) right only egress lane and one (1) ingress lane October 2, 2013 Public Hearing Agenda Item 501 Page 16 Function Classification: State Road 434 is a principal arterial that runs north from Edgewater Drive near Orlando to Altamonte Springs, then east to Oviedo, and then south to East Colonial Drive. Within this portion of the City of Winter Springs, State Road 434 is a four-lane roadway. Likewise, that portion of Tuskawilla Road adjacent to the subject property is currently a four-lane roadway. According to the City's Comprehensive Plan, the level of service (LOS) on the portion of State Road 434 and Tuskawilla Road is B'. The traffic study provided by the applicant identifies an overall development of 366 residential units on 116 acres (60 acres to be annexed; approximately 56 acres currently within the City). On September 23, 2013, staff received via email a revised unit count of 450 total residential units. Staff has determined the preliminary traffic impact analysis to be incomplete and therefore is requesting a complete/modified report that matches the proposed project before finalizing our analysis of said report (see Attachment D - Traffic Impact Analysis). POTABLE WATER: City water is available to serve the proposed project. WASTEWATER City sewer service is available to serve the proposed project. RECLAIMED WATER: Reclaimed water is not available at this time. However, the irrigation system will be required to meet reclaimed water standards for future connection to reclaimed water when available. ELECTRIC SERVICE: Facilities serving the parcels: None currently. The City of Winter Springs is serviced by Duke Energy for electric service. Duke Energy will provide service to this area, with no interruption of service. A future land use change will not impact current electric rates. SOLID WASTE: Facilities serving the parcels: None currently. The City of Winter Springs currently has a franchise agreement and is serviced by Waste Pro, a private solid waste contractor who will provide service to this area. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT: October 2, 2013 Public Hearing Agenda Item 501 Page 17 Facilities serving the parcels: None currently. Upon development, the site will be required to provide on-site stormwater management in accordance with all applicable St. John's River Water Management District (SJRWMD) criteria. POLICE: The City of Winter Springs is responsible for police protection. The station closest in proximity to the subject property is located at 300 N. Moss Road. Response times are averaged monthly. FIRE: Seminole County is responsible for fire protection. City Hall currently houses a fire station with a response time of 3 to 5 minutes to this area. NUISANCE POTENTIAL OF PROPOSED USE TO SURROUNDING LAND USES: The change in designation from Seminole County "Industrial" to City of Winter Springs "Town Center" will not result in any nuisance potential for the surrounding properties because proposed uses are compatible with the "Town Center" future land use designation, and the subject property is surrounded primarily by commercial, public/semi- public, and residential uses. NATURAL RESOURCES COMPATIBILITY: There are no conservation overlays on the subject property. SOILS According to the Soil Survey of Seminole County, Florida, prepared by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), four (4) soil types occur within the subject property boundaries (see Attachment E - Preliminary Environmental Assessment). These soils include the following: 2, Adamsville-Sparr Fine Sands 20, Myakka and Eaugallie Fine Sands 26, Udorthents, Excavated 31, Tavares-Millhopper Fine Sands, 0 To 5 Percent Slopes Adamsville-Sparr fine sand (#2) is a nearly level, somewhat poorly drained soils on low ridges on the uplands and low knolls on the flatwoods. Typically the surface layer of this soil type is grayish brown fine sand about 4 inches thick. In most years, the seasonal high water table for this soil type is at a depth of 12 to 36 inches for up to 6 months. The permeability of Adamsville soil is rapid. The permeability of Sparr soil is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers and is slow or moderately slow in the subsoil. October 2, 2013 Public Hearing Agenda Item 501 Page 18 Myakka and EauGallie fine sands (#20) are nearly level, poorly drained soils found on broad plains on the flatwoods. Typically the surface layer of Myakka soil consists of black fine sand about 5 inches thick. Typically the surface layer of EauGallie soil consists of dark gray fine sand about 5 inches thick. During most years the seasonal high table for this soil type is within 12 inches of the surface for 1 to 4 months. The permeability of Myakka soil is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers and in the substratum and moderate or moderately rapid in the subsoil. The permeability of EauGallie soil is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers, moderate or moderately rapid in the sandy part of the subsoil and moderately slow in the loamy part of the subsoil. Udorthents, excavated (#26) consist of excavated areas of unconsolidated or heterogeneous soil and geologic materials, which have been removed mainly for use in road construction or as fill material in low areas and for building foundations. Most areas of Udorthents, excavated locally called borrow pits, are from 5 to 40 feet deep. Some of the pit bottoms are seasonally ponded. Most pit areas have been left idle. These areas must be smoothed, shaped, and filled if they are to be used for agricultural or for urban development. Tavares-Millhopper fine sands, 0 to 5 percent slopes (#31) are nearly level to gently sloping, moderately well drained soils found on low ridges and knolls on the uplands. Typically the surface layer of Tavares soil consists of very dark grayish brown fine sand about 6 inches thick. Typically the surface layer of Millhopper soil consists of gray fine sand about 7 inches thick. The soils in this map unit have a seasonal high table at a depth of 36 to 60 inches for 2 to 6 months. The permeability of Tavares soil is rapid or very rapid. The permeability of Millhopper soil is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers and moderately slow in the subsoil. The Florida Association of Environmental Soil Scientists (FAESS) considers the main components of Basinger and Smyrna fine sands, depressional (#11) as a hydric soil type. Furthermore, the FAESS considers inclusions present in Myakka and EauGallie fine sands (#20), Udorthents, excavated (#26) and St. Johns and EauGallie fine sands (#29) as hydric. This information can be found in the Hydric Soils of Florida Handbook, Third Edition (March, 2000). FLOOD PRONE AREAS According to the Seminole County Property Appraiser's records, the property is within both flood zone "X" and "AE". Flood hazard areas identified on the Flood Insurance Rate Map are identified as a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA). SFHA are defined as the area that will be inundated by the flood event having a 1-percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. The 1-percent annual chance flood is also referred to as the base flood or 100-year flood. SFHAs are labeled as Zone "AE". The areas of October 2, 2013 Public Hearing Agenda Item 501 Page 19 minimal flood hazard, which are the areas outside the SFHA and higher than the elevation of the 0.2-percent-annual-chance flood, are labeled Zone "X". HISTORIC RESOURCES No known historical resources are known to be located on the subject property. WILDLIFE The environmental report that was submitted with the future land use amendment application indicates no gopher tortoises on the nine (9) acres to be annexed. However, there are gopher tortoises on that portion of the property currently within the City of Winter Springs. Based on the tortoise population that exists within that portion of the site within the City and the expected development plan for the overall 116 acre property, there is only one potential option for resolving the gopher tortoise issue. This option is off-site relocation and will require that any tortoise within 25 feet of proposed construction activities be relocated off-site to an approved recipient site. In addition to the on-site review for "listed" species, BTC conducted a review of the FFWCC's recorded Bald Eagle (Hahaeetus leucocephalus) nest sites on or in the vicinity of the subject property. This review revealed three (3) Bald Eagle nests, through the 2010- 2011 nesting season, within one mile of the subject site. These nests, Nest SE-002, Nest SE-003, and Nest SE-087, are all located greater than 660' from any portion of the subject property. As such, no restrictions towards the development of the site will apply. CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Future Land Use Element The Conceptual Plan that was presented by the applicant, as a point of discussion purposes, contains 450 residential units on 116 acres yielding a density of 3.87 dwelling units per acre. Per the Comprehensive Plan, the Town Center future land use category has no maximum density threshold. To help evaluate the anticipated impact of said development, the applicant has agreed to enter into a Developer's Agreement hereby limiting the maximum density of said project to no more than four (4) units per gross acre. The Town Center category was based upon traditional design standards for development that will become the identifying focus of the City's downtown and contribute to an increased and diversified tax base for the City. The primary purpose of the Town Center shall be to create an economically successful, vibrant, aesthetic, compact, multimodal, diverse, mixed use (including horizontal and vertical integration of uses) neo-traditional urban environment, designed on a pedestrian scale and with a pedestrian orientation. The Town Center is to be a place where people can reside in a mix of single and multiple family dwellings, work, gather to shop, relax, recreate, be entertained, attend community events, and enjoy the natural beauty of lands located in the Town Center. October 2, 2013 Public Hearing Agenda Item 501 Page 110 The surrounding area is generally characterized by existing cattle grazing, public/semi- public uses, low and medium density residential, and an office park located on Tuskawilla Road. The existing Tuscawilla Planned Unit Development (PUD), located to both the east and south, was annexed into the City of Winter Springs in 1972. Said development includes a combination of single-family, multi-family, commercial, and many park and open space amenities. The proposed future land use amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed future land use amendment is consistent with the following Goals, Objectives and Policies from the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan: 1. GOAL 1: Quality of Life. To ensure that the character, magnitude, and location of all land uses provides a system for orderly growth and development (as defined in sections 163.3221 and 380.04, Florida Statutes) that achieves a balanced, natural, energy efficient, and economic environment, and enhances the quality of life of all residents throughout and beyond the 2030 planning horizon. Response: The subject site as it currently exists is an enclave surrounded by the City of Winter Springs. This enclave is adjacent to the City's Town Center and will be developed consistently with the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. Policy 1.2.2: Potable Water. Do not issue development orders unless it can be determined that adequate potable water supplies and facilities are available. (Cross Reference: See Infrastructure Element, Policy 2.3.3) Response: Water is available to serve the project. 3. Policy 1.2.4: Sewer. Require residential and commercial development and redevelopment, to connect to or extend the central sewer system to provide service to their development, except for single family residential that includes only one or two lots. (Cross Reference: See Infrastructure Element, Policy 1.4.1) Response: Sewer is available to serve the project. 4. Policy 1.4.2: Higher Density Infill. Encourage the efficient use of land with compatible infill and higher density and intensity development within the Town Center and the U.S. 17-92 CRA Corridor. Response: The applicant seeks to expand the boundaries of both the City and the Town Center in preparation for a mixed-use community. October 2, 2013 Public Hearing Agenda Item 501 Page 111 5. Policy 1.8.2: Enclaves. Annex all enclaves, where feasible, in order to reduce land use conflicts and provide efficient public service. Response: The subject site as it currently exists is an enclave surrounded by the City of Winter Springs. 6. Policy 1.8.3: Condition for Connection to City Utilities. Require new development within the County in areas that are contiguous to the City, to be annexed into the City and to be developed to City standards as a condition for connection to City utilities, unless that development is the subject of a mutually accepted utility agreement. Response: The subject property as it currently exists is an enclave surrounded by the City of Winter Springs. The requested Large-Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment is a companion to a proposed Annexation (Ordinance 2013-12) and Rezoning (Ordinance 2013-15) request. Upon annexation adoption, the proposed project will be developed to City standards as a condition for connection to City utilities. 7. Policy 2.1.2: Design Charette. Host design charettes to create small area plans consistent with the Town Center Master Plan, involving property owners and stakeholders for the following areas, prior to their development: a. Between Orange Avenue and Lake Jesup b. North of and adjacent to Tuscawilla PUD Response: In accordance with Policy 2.1.2., Future Land Use Element, the City hosted a Design Charette for the proposed development on May 2, 2013. 8. Policy 6.1.4: Procedures for Inclusion of Annexed Properties into the City's TCEA. Place properties that involve a large-scale land use amendment into a City TCEA Zone as part of the large-scale amendment process and amend simultaneously the appropriate TCEA map(s). Place properties that involve a small-scale land use amendment into a City TCEA Zone as part of the next large- scale amendment cycle, and amend simultaneously the appropriate TCEA map(s). During the interim period, after obtaining a City land use category, but prior to placement in a City TCEA Zone, development on property may proceed by the development providing and funding mobility standards and requirements of the most physically proximate Zone. If the property is adjacent to two Zones, the City shall assign the Zone after making a determination as to which is most appropriate. (Ord. 2010-18; 10-25-10) Response: Per Policy 1.11.2, Transportation Element, TCEA Zone A is identified as the Central Mobility Hub and is generally located at the heart of the City at October 2, 2013 Public Hearing Agenda Item 501 Page 112 the intersection of State Road 434 and Tuskawilla Road and coincides generally with the Town Center. As part of the requested Large-Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment, staff is placing the subject property within TCEA Zone A and simultaneously updating the existing TCEA Zone A Map to reflect said change. 9. Policy 1.3.1 - requires all development proposals to determine their specific impacts on current Level of Service (LOS) and mobility standards. Response: Staff has requested a revised Traffic Impact Analysis for said development. The revised report shall analyze the adjusted residential unit count from 336 to 450 total units. 10. Policy 1.3.4 - requires the City to support proposed future land use map amendments with data and analysis demonstrating that adequate water supplies and associated public facilities will be available to meet the projected growth demands. Response: City water and sewer service is available to serve the subject property. 11. Policy 1.6.4 - Encourages land uses that generate high traffic counts to locate adjacent to arterial roads and mass transit systems. Response: The proposed mixed-use development is adjacent to both Tuskawilla Road and State Road 434. Both roadways are four (4) lane arterial facilities that are currently operating at or above level of service B. 12. Policy 1.7.1 - requires the City to consider existing and proposed land uses in adjacent jurisdictions when reviewing proposed land use amendments. Response: The proposed use and density is compatible with the surrounding area, as it generally characterized by low and medium density residential, commercial, and public/semi-public development patterns. Transportation Element The proposed future land use amendment is consistent with the following policies from the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan: 1. Policy 1.1.7 and Policy 1.11.5 — requires a Transportation Impact Analysis for all new development generating more than 300 total annual average daily trips. Response: Staff has requested a revised Traffic Impact Analysis for said development. October 2, 2013 Public Hearing Agenda Item 501 Page 113 FINDINGS: 1. The request is consistent with all applicable goals, objectives and policies of the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan. 2. The request is in conformance with the purpose and intent of the City Code and with all applicable requirements. 3. Considering the type and location of uses involved and the general character of the area, the change of the FLUM designation will not result in any incompatible land uses, including such factors as height, bulk, scale, intensity, traffic, noise, drainage, dust, lighting, appearance, and other factors deemed important. 4. The request is consistent with Florida Statute Chapter 163, Part II, of the Florida Statutes. FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed Large-Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment serves as the preliminary stage for allowing the subject property to be developed into a mixed-use development. Development of the subject property is anticipated to provide an increase to the City's taxable value. COMMUNICATION EFFORTS: The Meeting Agenda and this Agenda Item have been forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Board members and are available on the City's Website, LaserFiche, and the City's Server. The Agenda has been forwarded to the Mayor and City Commission; City Manager; and City Attorney/Staff. Additionally, the Meeting Agenda has been sent to media/press representatives, all Homeowner's Associations on file with the City, all individuals who have requested Agenda information, Department Directors; and also posted outside City Hall; posted inside City Hall with additional copies available for the general public. Pursuant to Florida Statutes 171.044 (6), the Seminole County Board of County Commissioners was sent via Certified Mail the notice of Annexation, Large-Scale Plan Amendment, and Rezoning for the subject parcels on September 3, 2013. Adjacent property owners have been notified by U.S. mail on September 23, 2013 (see Attachment F - Property Owner Notification Letter — September 23, 2013). In addition, the properties have been posted with a large yellow sign. Lastly, in accordance with Policy 2.1.2., Future Land Use Element, the City hosted a Design Charette for the proposed development on May 2, 2013. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Local Planning Agency hold a Public Hearing and recommend Approval to the City Commission for First Reading/Transmittal Hearing of Ordinance October 2, 2013 Public Hearing Agenda Item 501 Page 114 2013-13, a Large-Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment, Expedited State Review (14-1 ESR), which proposes to change the Future Land Use Map designation for nine (9) parcels totaling approximately 60 gross acres of property currently within Seminole County, Florida from "Industrial" to the City of Winter Springs "Town Center" Future Land Use Map designation. In addition, staff recommends placing the subject property within TCEA Zone A and simultaneously updating the existing TCEA Zone A Map to reflect said change. ATTACHMENTS: A. Location Map B. Ordinance 2013-13 C. Conceptual Plan D. Traffic Impact Analysis E. Preliminary Environmental Assessment F. Property Owner Notification Letter— September 23, 2013 G. Advertisement, Orlando Sentinel - September 19, 2013 ATTACHMENT "All LEGEND UNINCORPORATED AREA TO BE ANNEXED Cross Seminole Trail PARCEL TAX ID ACREAGE 1 06-21-31-501-OAOO-0000 5.23 2 06-21-31-501-OBOO-0000 4.20 3 26-20-30-5AR-OA00-008G 1.25 4 26-20-30-5AR-OA00-008C 12.56 5 06-21-31-501-0200-0000 2.12 6 06-21-31-501-OPOO-0000 1.23 7 26-20-30-5AR-OA00-0080 19.16 8 01-21-30-501-0000-0340 10.91 9 01-21-30-501-0000-0170 3.42 lw ii� Bop ����e lases! now Attachment "B" ORDINANCE NO. 2013-13 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA,RELATING TO COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING; PROVIDING FOR ADOPTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP BY DESIGNATING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS DESCRIBED AS NINE (9) PARCELS OF LAND, CONTAINING 60 GROSS ACRES, MORE OR LESS, AND GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF STATE ROAD 434 AND EAST OF TUSKAWILLA ROAD, SAID PARCELS BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DEPICTED AND DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO, FROM SEMINOLE COUNTY "INDUSTRIAL" TO CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS "TOWN CENTER"; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF PRIOR INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS; INCORPORATION INTO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; SEVERABILITY, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND LEGAL STATUS OF THE PLAN AMENDMENT. WHEREAS, section 163.3161 et. seq.,Florida Statutes(2011)established the Community Planning Act, which was formerly known as the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act; and WHEREAS,the Community Planning Act requires each municipality in the State of Florida to prepare, adopt, and update a Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS,in accordance with the provisions of the Community Planning Act, the Local Planning Agency of the City of Winter Springs held a duly noticed public hearing on October 2, 2013 on the proposed comprehensive plan amendment set forth in this Ordinance and considered applicable data and analysis and the findings and advice of staff, citizens, and all interested parties submitting written and oral comments; and WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency recommended the City Commission adopt the comprehensive plan text amendment set forth in this Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City Commission hereby finds that this Ordinance is in the best interests of the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Winter Springs, Florida; and City of Winter Springs Ordinance No.2013-13 Page 1 of 3 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are fully incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2. Authority. This Ordinance is adopted in compliance with, and pursuant to, the Community Planning Act, Sections 163.3161 et. seq., Florida Statutes. Section 3. Purpose and Intent. The purpose and intent of this ordinance is to adopt a comprehensive plan amendment incorporating the revisions stated herein as part of the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan. Section 4. Adoption of Amendment to the Future Land Use Map. The City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan, Future Land Use Map, is hereby amended by designating the real property depicted on Exhibit "A" from Seminole County "Industrial" to City of Winter Springs "Town Center." Exhibit"A" is attached hereto and fully incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. Repeal of Prior Inconsistent Ordinances and Resolutions. All prior inconsistent ordinances and resolutions adopted by the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs,or parts of ordinances and resolutions in conflict herewith,are hereby repealed to the extent of the conflict. Section 6. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, word or provision of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction,whether for substantive,procedural, or any other reason, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. Section 7. Incorporation Into Comprehensive Plan. Upon the effective date of the Comprehensive Plan amendments adopted by this Ordinance,said amendments shall be incorporated into the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan and any section or paragraph number or letter and any heading may be changed or modified as necessary to effectuate the foregoing.Grammatical, typographical, and like errors may be corrected and additions, alterations, and omissions, not affecting the construction or meaning of this Ordinance and the City Comprehensive Plan may be freely made. Section 8. Effective Date and Legal Status of the Plan Amendment. The effective date of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment adopted by this Ordinance shall be thirty-one(3 1)days after the state land planning agency notifies the City that the plan amendment package is complete pursuant to section 163.3184 (3)(c), Florida Statutes. If the plan amendment is timely challenged, the plan amendment shall not become effective until the state land planning agency or the City of Winter Springs Ordinance No.2013-13 Page 2 of 3 Administration Commission enters a final order determining the adopted amendment to be in compliance. No development orders, development permits, or land use dependent on this plan amendment may be issued or commenced before it has become effective. After and from the effective date of this plan amendment, the Comprehensive Plan Amendment set forth herein shall amend the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan and become a part of that plan and the plan amendment shall have the legal status of the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan, as amended. ADOPTED by the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, in a regular meeting assembled on the day of , 2014. Charles Lacey, Mayor ATTEST: Andrea Lorenzo-Luaces, City Clerk Approved as to legal form and sufficiency for the City of Winter Springs only: Anthony A. Garganese, City Attorney City of Winter Springs Ordinance No.2013-13 Page 3 of 3 Exhibit "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION (PER TITLE COMMITMENT): PARCELS 7, 8, 12, 14, and 17 and the platted roads, Gardena Farms, as recorded in Plat Book 6, pages 23 through 24, of the Public Records of Seminole County, Florida, together being described as follows: A portion of Tuskawilla, D.R. Mitchell's survey of the Levy Grant, as recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 5, and a portion of Gardena Farms Town Sites, as recorded in Plat Book 6, Page 39, and a portion of Gardena Farms, as recorded in Plat Book 6,Pages 23 through 24, all of the Public Records of Seminole County, Florida,being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the Northwest corner of Lot 51, Tuscawilla Unit 9, as recorded in Plat Book 24, pages 72-73 of the Public Records of Seminole County, Florida; thence run North 55°27'26"West, along the Westerly right of way line of Rails to Trails, as recorded in Official Records Book 3177,Page 632 of the Public Records of Seminole County, Florida, for a distance of 595.66 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence departing said Westerly right of way line run South 24°15'39" West, along the Westerly line of Lot 1, Block 1, Gardena Farms Town Sites, as recorded in Plat Book 6,page 39 of the Public Records of Seminole County, Florida, for a distance of 86.39 feet; thence run South 09°45'37" West for a distance of 55.07 feet to a point on the Southerly right of way line of Railroad Avenue, as shown on the said Plat of Gardena Farms Town Sites; thence run North 55°27'26" West, along said Southerly right of way line, for a distance of 636.73 feet to a point on the South line of the North 112 of Block 3 of said Gardena Farms Town Sites; thence departing said Southerly right of way line,run North 85°4244" West, along said South line of the North 112 of Block 3, for a distance of 635.00 feet to a point on the West line of said Block 3; thence departing said South line,run North 04°1T16" East, along said West line, for a distance of 377.73 feet to the North line of said Gardena Farms Town Sites; thence departing said West line,run North 85°44'34" West, along said North line, for a distance of 1291.09 feet to a point on the Easterly right of way line ofTuskawilla Road; thence run North 13°13'34" East, along said Easterly right of way line, for a distance of 45.94 to the point of curvature of a curve, concave Westerly,having a radius of 5813.47 feet, a chord bearing of North 11'19'20" East and a chord distance of 382.08 feet; thence run Northerly along the arc of said curve, and said Easterly right of way line,through a central angle of 03°45'59" for an are distance of 382.15 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve, concave Easterly, having a radius of 5693.21 feet, a chord bearing of North 11°19'33" East and a chord distance of 374.86 feet; thence run Northerly along said curve and said Easterly right of way line, through a central angle of 03'4624" for an are distance of 374.93 feet to the point of tangency; thence run North 13°13'03" East, along said Easterly right of way line, for a distance of 12.05 feet; thence departing.said Easterly right of way line, run South 87°58'44" East for a distance of 511.70 feet to the Westerly right of way line of the unnamed street as shown in said Plat Book 1, page 5;thence run South 87°17'59" East for a distance of 15.00 feet to the centerline of said unnamed street; thence run North 02°41'54" East, along said centerline of unnamed street, for a distance of 372.00 feet; thence run North 87'17'59" West for a distance of 15.00 feet to the aforesaid Westerly right of way line of the unnamed street; thence departing said Westerly right of way line,run North 81°23'14" West for a distance of 188.75 feet; thence run North 11°14'43" East for a distance of 47.95 feet;thence run North 74°48'12" West for a distance of 244.40 feet to the aforesaid Easterly right of way line of Tuskawilla Road, said point being on a curve, concave Easterly,having a radius of 5677.58 feet, a chord bearing of North 14°37'20" East and a chord distance of 240.25 feet;thence ran Northerly along the arc of said curve, and said Easterly right of way line, through a central angle of 02°25'29" for an arc distance of 240.27 feet; thence departing said Easterly right of way line, run South 87°58'38" East for a distance of 369.67 feet to a point on the aforesaid Westerly right of way line of the unnamed street; thence run South 871754" East for a distance of 30.00 feet to a point on the Easterly right of way line of the unnamed street; thence run South 02°42'26" West, along the said Easterly right of way line, for a distance of 14.64 feet;thence departing said Easterly right of way line, run South 87°58'38" East for a distance of 142.88 feet to a point on the Westerly right of way line of the Rails to Trails, said point also being a point on a curve, concave Easterly,having a radius of 4008.02 feet, a chord bearing of South 04°25'42" East and a chord distance of 293.20 feet; thence run Southerly along the are of said curve, and said Westerly right of way line,through a central angle of 04°11'32" for an arc distance of 293.27 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve, concave Easterly,having a radius of 2248.74 feet; a chord bearing of South 15°30'27" East and a chord distance of 689.06 feet; thence run Southerly along the arc of said curve,.and said Westerly right of way line,through a central angle of 17°37'34" for an arc distance of 691.79 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve, concave Northeasterly,having a radius of 1915.35 feet, a chord bearing of South 37°05'33" East and a chord distance of 846.86 feet;thence run Southeasterly along the are of said curve, and said Westerly right of way line,through a central angle of 25°32'38" for an arc distance of 853.91 feet; thence run North 37°0828" East, along said Westerly and Southerly right of way line, for a distance of 19.99 feet; thence run South 52°44'55" East, along said Westerly and Southerly right of way line, for a distance of 236.35 feet; thence run South 38°13'59" West, along said Westerly and Southerly right of way line, for a distance of 17.96 feet; thence run South 55°27'26" East, along said Westerly and Southerly right of way line, for a distance of 819.82 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. LESS AND EXCEPT any platted rights of way not shown as vacated. Containing 1,517,496 square feet, or 34.84 acres,more or less. Parcels 4, 5, 9, and 10, together being described as follows: A portion of Tuskawilla, D.R. Mitchell's survey of the Levy Grant, as recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 5, and a portion of Gardena Farms Town Sites, as recorded in Plat Book 6, Page 39, all of the Public Records of Seminole County, Florida,being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the Northwest comer of the Reserve at Tuscawilla Phase 11, as recorded in Plat Book 50, Pages 3 through 9 of the Public Records of Seminole County, Florida; thence run thence run South 00°45'33" East along the Westerly line of said Reserve at Tuseawilla,Phase 11, also being the East line of Block A and Block D, Gardena Farms Town Sites, as recorded in Plat Book 6, Page 39, of the said Public Records of Seminole County, Florida, for a distance of 810.29 feet to a point on the Northeasterly right of way line of the Rails to Trails; thence departing said West line and said East line,run North 55°28'13" West along said Northeasterly right of way line, for a distance of 1393.50 feet to the point of curvature of a curve, concave . Northeasterly,having a radius of 1815.35 feet, a chord bearing of North 39°53'47" West and a chord distance of 973.99 feet; thence run Northwesterly along the arc of said curve, and said Northeasterly right of way line, through a central angle of 31°07'19" for an are distance of 986.06 feet; thence departing said curve, and said Northeasterly right of way line, run South 85°45'55" East for a distance of 956.82 feet to a point on the Southerly right of way line of State Road 434; thence run South 41'02'40" East along said Southerly right of way line for a distance of 43.63 feet to a point on a curve, concave Northeasterly,having a radius of 2998.40 feet, a chord bearing of South 56°12'43" East and a chord distance of 373.78 feet; thence run Southeasterly along the are of said curve, and said Southerly right of way line, through a central angle of 07°08'50" for an arc distance of 374.02 feet; thence departing said curve,run North 30°12'52" East, along said Southerly right of way line, for a distance of 15.00 feet to a point on a curve, concave Northeasterly,having a radius of 2983.40 feet, a chord bearing of South 61'27'48" East and a chord distance of 174.69 feet;thence run Southeasterly along the are of said curve, and said Southerly right of way line,through a central angle of 03°21'20" for an arc distance of 174.72 feet; thence departing said curve, run South 04°13'03" West, along said Southerly right of way line, for a distance of 206.3 8 feet to the Northerly right of way line of Old State Road 434; thence run South 31°20'20" West for a distance of 30.00 to the Centerline of said right of way, said point also being on a curve, concave Northerly, having a radius of 581.40 feet, a chord bearing of South 76°03'01" East and a chord distance of 347.22 feet;thence run Easterly along the arc of said curve, and said Centerline, through a central angle of 34°44'53" for an arc distance 352.60 feet; thence departing said curve,run South 02°25'12" East for a distance of 29.86 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. LESS AND EXCEPT any platted rights of way not shown as vacated.. AND ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT that portion of old State Road 434 as shown on the Florida Department of Transportation Right of Way Map Section 77070-2517. Containing 1;207,960. square feet, or 27.73 acres, more or less. Parcel 15, also being described as.follows: A portion of Tuskawilla, D.R. Mitchell's survey of the Levy Grant, as recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 5, of the Public Records of Seminole County, Florida,being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the Northwest corner of the Reserve at Tuscawilla Phase 11, as recorded in Plat Book 50, Pages 3 through 9 of the Public Records of Seminole County, Florida; thence run thence run South 00°4533" East along the Westerly line of said Reserve at Tuscawilla, Phase 11, also being the East line of Block A and Block D, Gardena Farms Town Sites, as recorded in Plat Book 6, Page 39, of the said Public Records of Seminole County,Florida, for a distance of 810.29 feet to a point on the Northeasterly right of way line of the Rails to Trails; thence departing said West line and said East line,run North 55°28'13" West along said Northeasterly right of way line, for a distance of 1393.50 feet to the point of curvature of a curve, concave Northeasterly,having a radius of 1815.35 feet, a chord bearing of North 39°53'47" West and a chord distance of 973.99 feet; thence run Northwesterly along the are of said curve, and said Northeasterly right of way line, through a central angle of 31°07'19" for an are distance of 986.06 feet; thence departing said curve, and said Northeasterly right of way line, run South 85°45'55" East for a distance of 956.82 feet to a point on the Southerly right of way line of State Road 434; thence continue South 85°45'55" East for a distance of 279.36 feet to a point on the Northerly right of way line of said State Road 434 and the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence departing said Southerly right of way line, run South 85°45'55" East for a distance of 242.50 feet; thence run South 04°13'03" West for a distance of 132.06 feet to a point on the aforesaid Northerly right of way litre, said paint also being a point on a curve, concave Northeasterly, having a radius of 2853.40 feet, a chord bearing of North 60°55'00" West and a chord distance of 112.65 feet;thence run Northwesterly along the are of said curve, and said Northerly right of way line, through a central angle of 02°1544" for an are distance of 112.66 feet; thence departing said curve,run North 30°12'52" East, along said Northerly right of way line, for a distance of 10.00 feet to a point on a curve, concave Northeasterly,having a radius of 2843.40 feet, a chord bearing of North 58°08'24" West and a chord distance of 163.31 feet; thence run Northwesterly along the arc of said curve, and said Northerly right of way line, through a central angle of 03°17'29" for an arc distance of 163.34 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING_ Containing 16,374 square feet, or 0.38 acres,more or less. v nr °va ma Q Sll 7 ran Z r•C O rb 'ho W N[c + I ca + , n r. r. L+r I+ �`Ll � { ��. �"" '" �i Ate;. w "ao�l fi CD Nil CD I I ! L,�� �.i if �i 1 f\ rI \Yr" `� ro m4[• Ali.v^ y .ate CL �IL _ ern A . I�\ ii i 1 3 �a 3 OV O pD 0 �Si M-0 x Q�II r M.Blake r `� Blvd -C�a • r Wetlands �` /(/ Bus ness olstrict r r., Wetlands I n r • • • Heathe • r.. Churc- h� 'Se �,.L ,Wetland s Reserve at • g 'E Imo-A°�,: `- aj IA Tuskawdla • m ♦ ._ r Phase I • lim,� ML Indian Trads 1 IN ' ' Middle School tt / r Pedestrian Ac ss � 1 'Moog am To 5 hool Sue k; ...,.r. �.. ►rL`� ���r �i�� �Y � ilk r��,� � e�iwr•+•C a P rk ownh,1o}meK_ -w ir Keith EI mentry s,r•+k l�'.Fy'1.�"""."I '� �_��U m�v ilir•�R -'- ve at Tuesr u ase Ila Attachment "D" TUSKAWILLA POINTE Project Ne 13-015-1.0 May 2013 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF WINTER SPIRNGS, FL Prepared by: TVLC Traffic & Mobility Consultants 1507 S. Hiawassee Road, Suite 212 Orlando, Florida 32835 www.trafficmobility.com (407) 575-5439 Prepared for: Standard Pacific Homes 558 West New England Ave, Suite 250 Winter Park, Florida 32789 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This traffic analysis was conducted to assess the impact of the proposed Tuskawilla Pointe, a residential community with 336 units. The site is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of SR 434 and Tuskawilla Road. The study included a determination of project trip generation, a review of existing and projected roadway and intersection capacity, a review of the access points, and a mobility review. The results of the analysis are summarized as follows: • The proposed development will generate 2,980 new trips per day, of which 231 trips will occur in the AM peak hour and 293 trips will occur in the PM peak hour. • An analysis of roadway capacity reveals that all study segments currently operate within their adopted capacity and are projected to continue to do so at project buildout. • An analysis of intersection capacity indicates that the study intersections currently operate adequately within their design capacity and are projected to continue to do so at project buildout. • The recommended access lane configuration for the project access points is: • Main Entrance at Tuskawilla Rd— 1 right only egress lane and 1 ingress lane • Michael Blake Blvd at Tuskawilla Rd — 1 right only and 1 shared left through egress lanes, 1 ingress lane • Michael Blake Blvd at SR 434 — 1 right only and 1 shared left through egress lanes, 1 ingress lane • Gardena Ave at SR 434— 1 right only egress lane and 1 ingress lane • The review of the existing left turn deceleration lane dimensions revealed that all existing left turn lanes are adequate, with the exception of the southbound left turn lane on Tuskawilla Road and Michael Blake Boulevard. The lane is constrained by the adjacent northbound left turn lane approaching the signal at SR 434. However, it is recommended to extend the lane by 20 feet southward if possible. • The project generates 2,980 daily trips corresponding to a Level 3 development. Therefore, in accordance with the City's TCEA and mobility strategies, the project is required to implement 3 mobility strategies. The following existing mobility elements are available at the project site: • The adjacent streets are improved with sidewalks and pedestrian facilities. • The project is served by an existing fixed bus route (Link 434) providing access to the regional mass transit system. • Finally, the project is adjacent to the Florida Trail a multi-use dedicated trail facility that provides access to the regional trail network. The proposed development does not adversely impact the transportation network and is adequately supported by existing facilities Tuskawilla Pointe TA&C.."', Project Ida 13-015-1.0 Executive Summary Traffic a Mabl y Consubanls 1 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that I am a Professional Engineer properly registered in the State of Florida l practicing with Traffic & Mobility Consultants, LLC, a corporation authorized to operate as an engineering business, EB-30024, by the State of Florida Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Professional Engineers, and that I have prepared or approved the evaluations, findings, opinions, conclusions, or technical advice attached hereto for: PROJECT: Tuskawilla Pointe LOCATION: City of Winter Springs, Florida CLIENT: Standard Pacific Homes I hereby acknowledge that the procedures and references used to develop the results contained in these computations are standard to the professional practice of Transportation Engineering as applied through professional judgment and experience. NAME: Mohammed Abdallah P.E. No.: Florida P.E. No. 56169 DATE: May 24, 2013 SIGNATURE: i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................1 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS...............................................................................3 2.1 Roadway Capacity Analysis..........................................................................................3 2.2 Intersection Capacity Analysis ......................................................................................4 3.0 TRIP GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION......................................................................7 3.1 Trip Generation .............................................................................................................7 3.2 Trip Distribution/Assignment.........................................................................................7 4.0 PROJECTED CONDITIONS ANALYSIS..........................................................................9 4.1 Projected Background Traffic........................................................................................9 4.2 Roadway Capacity Analysis..........................................................................................9 4.3 Intersection Capacity Analysis ................................................... ...........................12 4.4 Access Review............................................................................................................16 4.5 Mobility Strategies.......................................................................................................20 5.0 STUDY CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................21 APPENDICES.............................................................................................................................22 Appendix A Proposed Site Layout Appendix B Methodology Appendix C FDOT Traffic Volume Counts Appendix D Turning Movement Counts Appendix E FDOT QILOS Table Appendix F Existing Conditions HCS Worksheets Appendix G Trip Generation Worksheets Appendix H Vested Trips Information Appendix I Projected Conditions HCS Worksheets Tuskawilla Pointe TACC"/ Project Ns 13-015-1.0 Table of Contents, Page i Traffic a Mobility Consultants LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Existing Roadway Capacity Analysis..............................................................................3 Table 2 Existing Intersection Capacity Analysis ..........................................................................4 Table 3 Trip Generation Analysis.................................................................................................7 Table 4 Projected Roadway Capacity Analysis ...........................................................................9 Table 5 Projected Intersection Capacity Analysis......................................................................12 LIST OF FIGURES i Figure1 Project Site Location....................................................................•.................................2 Figure 2 Existing AM Peak Hour Intersection Volumes ...............................................................5 Figure 3 Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection Volumes...............................................................6 Figure 4 Project Trip Distribution .................................................................................................8 Figure 5 AM Peak Hour Vested Trips........................................................................................10 Figure 6 PM Peak Hour Vested Trips........................................................................................11 Figure 7 Project Trip Distribution at Study Intersections............................................................13 Figure 8 Projected AM Peak Hour Intersection Volume ............................................................14 Figure 9 Projected PM Peak Hour Intersection Volume ............................................................15 Figure 10 Project Access Configuration.....................................................................................17 Tuskawilla Pointe Tm--C� Project Ne 13-015-1.0 Table of Contents, Page ii Traffic Y Mobility Concuhants i 1.0 INTRODUCTION This traffic analysis was conducted to assess the traffic operations and impact of the proposed Tuskawilla Pointe residential development in the City of Winter Springs, Florida. The proposed development program is for a total of 336 residential dwelling units, of which 250 units will be single family detached and 86 units will be townhomes. The site is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of SR 434 and Tuskawilla Road, near the Winter Springs Town Center. Figure 1 depicts the site location, the surrounding transportation network. Access to the site is proposed via one access point on Tuskawilla Road, one access point on the proposed M. Slake Boulevard Extension, and one access point on SR 434. The proposed master plan is included in Appendix A. The study was conducted in accordance with the approved study methodology, which is provided along with correspondence with the City in Appendix B. The facilities considered in the analysis are listed as follows and illustrated in Figure 2: Roadway Segments: • SR 434-- Heritage Park St to Tuskawilla Road Tuskawilla Road to Tuscora Drive • Tuskawilla Road — Blumberg Blvd to SR 434 SR 434 to Trotwood Blvd Intersections: Tuskawilla Rd & SR 434 Michael Blake Blvd Avery Lake Dr Median Opening at Church SR 434 & Michael Blake Blvd Gardena Avenue Tuscora Drive Project Access Points Data used in the analysis consisted of site plan/development information provided by the Project Engineers, AM & PM peak hour intersection traffic counts obtained by Traffic & Mobility Consultants, LLC, vested trips information provided by the City of Winter Springs, roadway traffic volumes and service volume thresholds from the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), and trip generation data published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Tuskawilla Pointe TACC--" Project Ne 13-015-1.0 Page 1 Trof!'t 8 Mobility Consultants We +• 4T• 7 V. rs r.• r r +• I , f " ' t - ate'zoo • '� - �-'•�T w �� id- *�� t J spa''' s, -�#" p i i 41& 3 i� r! � .'I?+'r titer` •�'�+, �y.» _ r ,+ :;� `�; Wlhl(yNldrif t a) v J. {•�_ -40.x. jkp SITE�.ai.�!"�� • ��i��:.a,• i .ice... r �-t � �r�� � � - '/) .,,•„ter•. �. LOCATION Project r c� Tuskawilia Pointe m 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS An analysis of existing conditions was conducted for the study roadways and intersections to determine the baseline condition on the transportation network. 2.1 Roadway Capacity Analysis Existing roadway capacity was analyzed based on existing PM Peak Hour traffic volumes obtained from the 2012 FDOT traffic counts and the traffic volumes collected by TMC at the study intersections. The FDOT traffic information is included in Appendix C and the existing TMCs are provided in Appendix D. Service volumes and capacity values were obtained from the 2009 QILOS Manual Generalized Capacity Tables, included in Appendix E. The roadway capacity analysis summarized in Table 1 reveals that the study roadway segments currently operate within their adopted capacity. Table 1 Existing Roadway Capacity Analysis Capacity Roadway #of LOS Existing Volume_J Directional Adequate iSegment Lanes Std NB/EB SB/WB SR 434 Heritage Park St to Tuskawilla Rd 4 E 1,359 1,521 1,870 Yes Tuskawilla Rd to Tuscora Dr 4 E 998 1,117 1,870 Yes Tuskawilla Rd Blumberg Blvd to SR 434 2 D 219 168 790 Yes SR 434 to Trotwood Blvd 4 E 673 66B 1,760 Yes Tuskawilla Pointe TA&C.� Project W 13-015-1.0 TmFfic a Me6APly Cansuflanh Page 3 i 2.2 Intersection Capacity Analysis A capacity analysis was performed for the AM and PM peak hours to determine existing operating conditions at the study intersections. The capacity analysis was conducted using the Highway Capacity Software (HCS+) and the methods of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). Turning movement volumes obtained during the AM and PM peak hours are included in Appendix D and are presented in Figure 2 and Figure 3, respectively. The results of the intersection capacity analysis, summarized in Table 2, reveal that the study intersections currently operate adequately during the morning and evening peak hours. The HCS worksheets are included in Appendix F. Table 2 Existing Intersection Capacity Analysis Traffic Peak EB WIB NB SB Overall Intersection I Control Period clay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS oelay LOS Delay LOS SR 434& AM 43.5 D 49.5 D 48.1 D 61.3 E 48.0 D Tuskawilla Rd Signal PM 59.3 D 60.2 E 498.5 D 71.9 E 58.2 E SR 434& AM 10.9 B 10.0 A 11.1 B -- - - -- Gardena Ave Stop PM 10.4 B 10.7 B 11.7 B - SR 434& AM 10.8 B 10.2 B 16.0 C - - Tuscora Dr Stop PM 10.4 B 10.8 B 17.3 C -- - - - Tuskawilla Rd& AM 10.1 B 10.0 B 8.9 A 8.9 A - Michael Blake Blvd Stop PM 10.1 B 10.0 B 8.9 A 8.9 A - Tuskawilla Rd& AM 13.7 B -- -- 8.9 A 9.3 A - Avery Lake Dr Stop PM 14.9 B -- - 9.3 A 9.3 A - - Tuskawilla Rd& AM 0.0 A 10.2 B 8.9 A 9.0 A - - Church Median Stop PM 1 14.4 B 0.0 A 9.2 A 9.3 A - - Tm--C� Tuskawilla Pointe Project Hs 13-015-1.0 Page 4 Tic a Me6ffity ConsvltQnts li LO u7 I 84 �o 39 Tucosa Dr �. 'r J o� o 0 00 LD m N m M W O �o Gardena Ave o 0C� 0 Ca i i C' N i Qrn .f- �87 000 �0 000 �o X00 �1 E 96 639 726 F 652 Tuskawilla Rd 452 84� 1266 61; 616-> 628 m N r �� O O r 0 0 m LD ¢ 0 0 m c d � I E m iv � � 61 J L L I i � o Figure: wN�a EXISTING AM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUME WJ3 ! 2Vm ���u x N LLs Project: Project No.: Z s --- "� Tuskawilla Pointe °NoaLL .-__ 13-015 1 �42 7ucosa Dr 29 0 0 m Ln m Ornm �0 £ 0 Gardena Ave 0 0 0� Q M �- O O r { lr) m cn H o of -104 000 �0 000 �0 000 �0 < 119 E 673 j 726 j < 723 450 L 3 L 25 3 7uskawdla Rd � _ j 71 T nF 3T 0 2� 92— > 662 624 7166> r— cc - 00f � OU7 ,_ o � vr— y 00 'r m m c s O � m v m ro � L fo J Q U of Figure: EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUME LI O p 1 M1 n =N"-.-.0 a Project: Project No.: Cz s Tuskawilla Pointe P� oa 13-015 1 3.0 TRIP GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION The project's traffic and travel characteristics determine the level of impact it will have on the surrounding transportation facilities. These characteristics include the project's trip generation, the distribution of those trips in the area, then their assignment to the roadway network. 3.1 Trip Generation The traffic generation of the proposed development was calculated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Report, 91" Edition. The trip generation for the project is summarized in Table 3 and a detailed worksheet is provided in the Appendix G. Table 3 Trip Generation Analysis ITE Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Code Land Use Size Rate I Trips Rate I Total Enter Exit Rate I Tota I Enter I Exit 230 Townhouse 86 DU 6.56 564 0.53 46 8 38 0.62 53 36 17 210 Single Family Detached 250 DU 9.66 2,416 0.74 185 46 139 0.96 240 151 89 Total Trip Generation 2,980 231 54 177 293 187 106 The proposed development will generate 2,980 new trips per day, of which 231 trips will occur during the AM peak hour and 293 trips will occur during the PM peak hour. 3.2 Trip Distribution/Assignment To assign the trips generated by the proposed development to the study roadways and intersections, a general distribution pattern in the vicinity of the project site was determined based on existing travel patterns and the location of the project with respect to other trip generators and attractors. The trip distribution pattern used in the analysis is illustrated in Figure 4. Tuskawilla Pointe TACC"J Project Ns 13-0'15-1.0 Page 7 Traffic a Me6111ry Con,ullanh + rt;2 �',_ r, r- �l i., r t-•'r�, �./ u,�/! t; i l +r . - CcO wit� rt-. .� �'! .v s . ti= , .; �-'�', :{• •.1 �° \ 4� wJt� f»'^ 1�1 f�'^ � 1 i i '�y Y� {�'f ` •y�\ ! r s $-E .� $ {� �'�� �- jl�#t.�kLf:.f .��4��`j l •e � • .1rg.. ��� M - }+ it NOV dol r-, _ jam- ML _ L or ai- ro in w Lo to ssa8 n Lm 4A 11'r I men I, JA V. AL0 PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION Project: Project No.. Tuskawilla Pointe 13-015 4.0 PROJECTED CONDITIONS ANALYSIS An analysis of projected conditions at project buildout year of 2016 was conducted based on future background traffic volumes and project trips. 4.1 Projected Background Traffic The City of Winter Springs provided information on vested trips from developments previously approved by the City in the vicinity of Tuskawilla Pointe. Namely, the following approved development traffic was included in the vested trips on the roadway network: • Grandeville • Winter Springs Village Phase 2 • Jesup's Landing & Artesian Park The vested trips were added to existing traffic volumes to obtain the projected background volumes used in the analysis. The vested trips are illustrated in Figure 5 and Figure 6 for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Excerpts from the approved Traffic Studies for the above referenced projects are included in Appendix H. Additionally, project trips assigned to each roadway segment and intersection movement were added to the projected background volume to obtain total traffic volume used in the analysis of projected conditions. 4.2 Roadway Capacity Analysis An analysis of daily traffic conditions on the study roadway segments was conducted to determine the availability of capacity to accommodate the traffic generated by the proposed development. Table 4 summarizes the projected capacity analysis and indicates that the study segments will operate adequately at project buildout. Table 4 Projected Roadway Capacity Analysis I Bkgd Volume Project Trips Total Volume I Dir I Adequate Roadway ISegment WES 561111116 NSIEB SB[WB NBIEB I SBIWB I Cap Cap. SR 434 Heritage Park St to Tuskawilla Rd 1,480 1,618 47 27 1,527 1,645 1,870 Yes Tuskawilla Rd to Tuscara Dr 1,060 1,150 37 65 1,097 1,215 1,870 Yes Tuskawilla Rd Blumberg Blvd to SR 434 371 251 16 28 387 279 790 Yes SR 434 to Trotwood Blvd 772 729 47 27 1 819 1 74$ 1 1,760 Yes Tuskawilla Pointe TWLC Project Ne 13.015-1.0 Traffic 4 Mobility Consultants Page 9 Y CD � Q r � .CQ IIII' v CD Tam Dr N Q 07 N s= r CL) i. a • ) N (� EL N N J a) Cli = C ttl N C_ (p I 0 0 0 I I O cn O O Gardena Ave + IV C=3 - O I N fo �P O �f {21}� {21} Co Q � N li .E [7]+{11}_18 26 26 26 (8) Tuskawilla Rd i [321+(37)=69 > 29 29 29 O m m a it II � m7 to m OS s d N ¢ U s o o Figure: AM PEAK HOUR VESTED TRIPS N -TT, m a 2vim � EE 9 � z N��� � Project: �z B u_ cs-- R Project No.: n o co° o Tuskawilla Pointe -015 N U�N 0 E 1 1 C 13 Y N � LO C rn Cil t= � tucosa Dr 0 < iZ c pn cn -E J Ln M C C to C co I O Q O 11 O O O G � + Gardena Ave O Gl O J M N � j L {12}� N� N N c0 r N I I CO N t{ N [30]+{39)=69 99 99 99 (30) Tuskawilla Rd A 1101� [15]+(22)=37 53 53 53� [20]+(17)+(2)=39----j � I F --- (� M LO II [I v } r Q C +v fY0 � 'a N m •N�_N � J r ? C tr cl M C U i 3 Figure: me: PM PEAK HOUR VESTED TRIPS n-�3 nm°.'°° aye �9 C g x N o °�rs Project: Z B • ! Project No.: � Ei 52 Tuskawilla Pointe �U- r 13-015 4.3 Intersection Capacity Analysis The projected volumes for the intersection operations analysis were obtained by combining background traffic and project trips. The project trip distribution at the intersection movements is summarized in Figure 7. The projected AM and FM peak hour turning movement volumes used in the analysis are illustrated in Figure 8 and Figure 9, respectively. The analysis was conducted using the HCS+ software as described previously. The results of the analysis, summarized in Table 5, reveal that the study intersection and project driveways are projected to continue operating adequately at buildout. The HCS worksheets are included in Appendix I. Table 5 Projected Intersection Capacity Analysis Intersection Traffic I Peak I - EB WB NB SB Overall Control I Period FD.lay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS SR 434& AM 47.0 D 57.0 E 51.3 D 68.5 E 53.4 I] Tuskawilla Rd Signal PM 63.6 E 65.8 E 53.8 D 76.4 E 63.0 E SR 434& AM 11.1 B 10.3 A 19.5 C 22.0 C - - M.Blake Blvd Stop PM 11.0 B 11.3 B 23.1 C 22.1 C - - SR 434& AM 11.0 B 10.5 A 12.1 B -- - - - Gardena Ave Stop PM 10.8 B 14.2 B 14.4 B - -• -- - SR 434& AM 11.0 B 10.8 B 17.7 c - - - - Tuscora Dr Stop PM 11.1 B 11.2 B 18.6 C -- -- - - Tuskawilla Rd& AM 10.2 B 17.0 C 9.0 A 9.2 A - -- Michael Blake Blvd Stop PM 10.9 B 18.9 C 9.3 A 9.7 A -- - Tuskawilla Rd 8 AM 14.7 B -- - 9.2 A 9.6 A - -- Avery Lake Dr Slop PM 16.4 C -- -- 9.7 A 9.8 A - - Tuskawilla Rd 8 AM - -- 11.2 B - - -- - - - Main Access Stop PM - - 11.4 B - -- -- - - - Tuskawilla Rd& AM 0.0 A 10.3 B 9.2 A 9.2 A - - Church Median Stop PM 15.9 C 0.0 A 9.6 A 9.9 A -The analysis reveals that all study intersections and driveways are projected to continue to operate adequately at project buildout. Tuskawilla Pointe Tm--C� Project Ne 13- 015-1.0 Trof(ic E Mobility Consultants Page 12 iu C W 0 rn M Tucasa Dr _T LLI 0 C4] M 4] W W �7 C C 0 0 O u7 r N t-25% Exit Gardena Ave k T ----------1-°----------------------------- r------------------------------------------ X N W En LU Ln \° W � ; 20% Exit r ° �20% Exit w¢ ' o SSBDDy ; M t-25% Enter? d '*--5% Enter Li! p� i o � 10% Exit Q �— 10°/Q Exit ------- ---------------------------------j L--------------------- -------------- T I� N N C C W W { 0 0 O u7 N 7 x W LU 1 Q o U 5% Enter+? ° 15°/Q Exit LO r '-5% Enter X25% Exit 0 —15/Q Exit 4 <-25% Exit <-25% Enter Tuskawilla Rd _ O% Exit 71 rpr 5% Enter T F 10% Enter 15% Exit+ 5% Enter - 10% Enter > 5% Enter--> 5% Enterer 25% Exit m m Wj LLJ o Q 3 O Lf) N x CO 3 co a t U ql 7 a U & Figure: a a PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION AT INTERSECTIONS o�y� Iry E �~j9 y= 9 E Project: F� Project No.. o Tuskawilla Pointe it U'4 A 13-015 1 a 4 I.` N L 1 �84 m .Ln nAOwm Ha`�w �, 0 0 4 i — a — � 4 m � + O J � t-1+(44)=45 11 % � F o v� my m m m r.....................................—.... t (35) (35) ssas3tl [� y (17) [Z11� T I I b A m I t—{14) t—� 1730+1261+(3)=759 n N o N N T--87 _ —(3) �p t— t-96+[78]+(26)=140 m <—fi39+[261+(44)=709 F726+[261+(tl7)a799 d° F652+[26]+{l4J=fi92 452+[8]+(27)6487 W r 1 —4+[18)=22! �. V2 Tus�awdU Rd W _ 84+[15]+(3)=10Z 1+(5) �` r..[29]+(29)=674--->1� �` F> � 126+[69]+[5)=200 617+[29]+{3)-649— I 6+[321=38 °°n° 1� Q o.- 3 N o M 628+[29]+{441=701 o c o G 2. ' O� 3 � M1 � � V Flpum: °S "a PROJECTED AM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUME a 2Z a � .• .N y p pmjact. 8ro)eet �a�Ng`LLt Tuskawilla Pointe 13-015 _ vim. t-42 a -- 7 29 D, o ct ° �2 t-1271 Gardena Ave o ............ . ......................... i i L> 0i(1 0) Jf 1721--1 --------------------------------------- Il 2 'L(47) -17726,[99]-(9)=034 0 -------------------- ........................... t-104 S (9) t—1 <-723+[99]+(47)=G6B 7-L-m�nn 3 �-25+011=36 4. 71+[7]+(9)=87 3,(19)=22 95+137]+(19)=151 665+[53]+(9)=727--t 2+[39]=41— 19 PROJECTED PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUME pwact: P ., mj.cl No Tuskawilla Pointe 13 4.4 Access Review A review of the proposed access plan was conducted to provide guidance and recommendations for the configuration of the proposed access points. The review focused on the number of lanes needed on the driveways to serve project traffic and on the dimensions of the deceleration lanes serving the project. The project four access connections addressed in this review are illustrated in Figure 10. Driveway Configuration The recommended lane configuration for the project's 4 access points is summarized as follows: 1. Main Entrance at Tuskawilla Rd— 1 right only egress lane and 1 ingress lane 2. Michael Blake Blvd at Tuskawilla Rd — 1 right only and 1 shared left through egress lanes, 1 ingress lane 3. Michael Blake Blvd at SR 434 — 1 right only and 1 shared left through egress lanes, 1 ingress lane 4. Gardena Ave at SR 434— 1 right only egress lane and 1 ingress lane Ri ht Turn Deceleration Lanes SR 434 and Tuskawilla Road are 4 lane divided facilities providing access to adjacent properties in the vicinity of the project site. Driveways and intersections on SR 434 and on Tuskawilla Road in this area are generally not improved with right turn deceleration lanes. This includes the new connection of the spine road Michael Blake Boulevard at SR 434. Furthermore, the project's access plan provides multiple points of ingress and egress on the external roadway network. The project's traffic is distributed to the various access points, reducing the volume of right turns at any one location. The projected movements indicate that the project's maximum peak hour right turn volume is 47 northbound right turning vehicles occurring at the Main Entrance driveway on Tuskawilla Road. On SR 434 the maximum projected right turn volume is 38 eastbound right turning vehicles at Gardena Avenue. Therefore, based on the existing profile of the roadways accessed and the projected traffic volumes, right turn deceleration lanes are not recommended at the project's access driveways on SR 434 and on Tuskawilla Road. Tuskawilla Pointe Tm--C� Project Ne 13- 015-1.0 traffic a Mobility toniullcn+a Page 16 IL t Q,qp NO IF Wt• , Al SON -t r 14. w MOL MP F®R kk ON= dm� x", 4m` -fits- line- left Jk r PROJECT CONFIGURATION Project: Project No.: Tuskawilla Pointe 13-015 m 1 Left Turn Deceleration Lanes The dimensions of the existing left turn deceleration lanes serving the project's four access points were assessed to determine if they are adequate to serve the projected turning vehicle volume. The assessment was made based on the projected traffic, the lane dimensions required per FDOT Design Standards Index 301, and per the FDOT Plans Preparation Manual formula for queue length storage expressed as follows: Queue Storage =2 x 25 x#of Vehicles/60: The review of left turn deceleration lanes is summarized as follows: 1. Main Entrance on Tuskawilla Rd Due to the restricted movements at this driveway, u-turns will occur at the two adjacent median openings. Therefore, the review was conducted of the southbound left turn lane at the church median opening, south of the access point, and of the northbound left turn lane at Avery Lake Drive, north of the access point. Southbound Left Turn — Existing Length = 215 feet(approx) Projected Left Turn Volume = 11 vehicles Speed Limit= 45 mph Deceleration Length = 185 feet Queue Length = 2 x 25 x 11 /60 = 9 feet Total Required Length = 185 } 9 = 194 feet Finding: Existing Lane is Adequate I Northbound Left Turn — I Existing Length = 215 feet (approx) Projected Left Turn Volume = 36 vehicles Speed Limit= 45 mph Deceleration Length = 185 feet Queue Length = 2 x 25 x 36 /60 = 30 feet Total Required Length = 185 + 30 = 215 feet Finding: Existing Lane is Adequate i 2. Southbound Left Turn Lane at Michael Blake Blvd &Tuskawilla Rd Existing Length = 185 feet (approx) Projected Left Turn Volume = 22 vehicles Speed Limit= 45 mph Deceleration Length = 185 feet Queue Length = 2 x 25 x 22 /60 = 18 feet Total Required Length = 185 + 18 = 203 feet Finding: Existing Lane is Deficient. It is constrained by adjacent northbound left turn lane. If possible extend the lane southward by 20 feet. TA&C.-v Tuskawilla Pointe Project Ns 13-015-1.0 Page 18 Traffic s Mobility Confullonts 3. Westbound Left Turn Lane at Michael Blake Blvd & SR 434 Existing Length = 375 feet (approx) Projected Left Turn Volume = 18 vehicles Speed Limit = 50 mph Deceleration Length = 240 feet Queue Length = 2 x 25 x 18160 = 15 feet Total Required Length = 240 f 15 = 255 feet Finding: Existing Lane is Adequate 4. Westbound Left Turn Lane at Gardena Avenue & SR 434 Existing Length = 350 feet (approx) Projected Left Turn Volume = 50 vehicles Speed Limit = 50 mph Deceleration Length = 240 feet Queue Length = 2 x 25 x 50160 =42feet Total Required Length = 240 } 42 = 282 feet Finding: Existing Lane is Adequate TM.C.� Tuskawilla Pointe Project Ns 13-015-1.0 Page 19 Traffic s MahBity CerssuEfnnfs i 4.5 Mobility Strategies The project site is located within Zones A, C and E of the City's Transportation Concurrency Exception Area. The proposed project is a Level 3 development, which is required to provide 3 mobility mitigation credits. The regional transit provider Lynx operates a fixed route service along SR 434 which provides connections to the regional mass transit system. Stops on the 434 Lynx route are located within walking distance of the property and may be used by residents as an alternative to single occupant vehicle transportation. Additionally, the project site is served by existing public sidewalks on SR 434 and on Tuskawilla Road. Connections to the public sidewalk system will be made from within the project where appropriate. Finally, the project is located along the Florida Trail, a multi-use dedicated trail that traverses Winter Springs and connects to the Cross Seminole Trail and the wider regional trail network. This facility will be available to Tuskawilla Pointe residents for use as an alternative transportation and recreation facility. Tuskawilla Pointe Twc."� Project Ne 13- 015-1.0 Traffic a Mobility Consultants Page 20 5.0 STUDY CONCLUSIONS This traffic analysis was conducted to assess the impact of the proposed Tuskawilla Pointe, a residential community with 336 units. The site is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of SR 434 and Tuskawilla Road. The study included a determination of project trip generation, a review of existing and projected roadway and intersection capacity, a review of the access points, and a mobility review. The results of the analysis are summarized as follows: • The proposed development will generate 2,980 new trips per day, of which 231 trips will occur in the AM peak hour and 293 trips will occur in the PM peak hour. • An analysis of roadway capacity reveals that all study segments currently operate within their adopted capacity and are projected to continue to do so at project buildout. • An analysis of intersection capacity indicates that the study intersections currently operate adequately within their design capacity and are projected to continue to do so at project buildout. • The recommended access lane configuration for the project access points is: • Main Entrance at Tuskawilla Rd— 1 right only egress lane and 1 ingress lane • Michael Blake Blvd at Tuskawilla Rd — 1 right only and 1 shared left through egress lanes, 1 ingress lane • Michael Blake Blvd at SR 434 — 1 right only and 1 shared left through egress lanes, 1 ingress lane • Gardena Ave at SR 434— 1 right only egress lane and 1 ingress lane • The review of the existing left turn deceleration lane dimensions revealed that all existing left turn lanes are adequate, with the exception of the southbound left turn lane on Tuskawilla Road and Michael Blake Boulevard. The lane is constrained by the adjacent northbound left turn lane approaching the signal at SR 434. However, it is recommended to extend the lane by 20 feet southward if possible. • The project generates 2,980 daily trips corresponding to a Level 3 development. Therefore, in accordance with the City's TCEA and mobility strategies, the project is required to implement 3 mobility strategies. The following existing mobility elements are available at the project site: o The adjacent streets are improved with sidewalks and pedestrian facilities. o The project is served by an existing fixed bus route (Link 434) providing access to the regional mass transit system. o Finally, the project is adjacent to the Florida Trail a multi-use dedicated trail facility that provides access to the regional trail network. The proposed development does not adversely impact the transportation network and is adequately supported by existing facilities. Tm-.C� Tuskawilla Pointe Project N2 13-015-1.0 Page 21 I ffit d Ma611ity CenwlFants APPENDICES i Appendix A Proposed Site Layout • dr tin M M ' i '�;- ., r M fir`�a'��+�1i�i` ;e>• s. '��� ��+� AM w 4,1 Adwk 46 E 6 JIM Iva !all 1� 3 Jul, ft" - W;7 M f �s ...... ..... nJ rill 0-7 04 -obi Appendix B Methodology i Rio-Tech Consulting Inc. info @btc-inc.com Environmental and Permitting Services www.hic-inc.com May 8, 2012 Attachment "E" Mike Plante, President L.D. Plante, Inc. PO Box 151117 Altamonte Springs, FL 32715 Proj: LD Plante Winter Springs Site - Seminole County, Florida Section 1 & 6, Township 21 South, Range 30 & 31 East (BTC File #178-19.05) Re: Preliminary Environmental Assessment Dear Mr. Plante: Orlando Office During April of 2012, Bio-Tech Consulting, Inc. (BTC) conducted a 2002 E Robinson St preliminary environmental assessment of the LD Plante Winter Springs site. Orlando FL 32803 This approximately 116-acre site is located on the southern side of State Vero Reach Office Road 434 and the eastern side of Tuskawilla Road, just west of State Road 1111 Indian River Blvo 417; within Section 1, Township 21 South, Range 30 East and Section 6, Suite 201 Vero Reach FL 32960 Township 21 South, Range 31 East, Seminole County, Florida (Figures 1, 2 Jacksonville Office & 3). This preliminary environmental assessment included the following 2036 Forbes St elements: Jacksonville FL 32204 Tampa Office • review of soil types mapped within the site boundaries; 333 Falkenhurg Rd N • evaluation of land use types/vegetative communities present; Suite A 128 Tampa FL 33619 • wildlife survey; and, Key West Office • field review for occurrence of protected species of flora and fauna. 1101 Key Plaza Suite 259 SOILS Key West FL 3304 1 Aquatic a Land According to the Soil Survey of Seminole County, Florida, prepared by the Management Operations 3825 Rouse Rd U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resources Conservation Orlando FL 32811 Service (NRCS), six (6) soil types occur within the subject property Native Plant Nursery boundaries (Figure 4). These soils include the following: 000 Farms 8580 Bunkhouse Rd Orlando FL 32832 , i 401.894.5910 fax Key West Vero Beach Orlando Jacksonville Tampa Mike Plante, L.D. Plante,Inc. LD Plante Winter Springs Site-Seminole County, Florida(BTC File#178-19.05) Preliminary Environmental Assessment Page 2 of 9 • Adam sville-Sparr fine sand (#2) • Basinger and Smyrna fine sands, depressional (#11) • Myakka and EauGallie fine sands (#20) • Udorthents, excavated (#26) • St. Johns and EauGallie fine sands (#29) • Tavares-Millhopper fine sands, 0 to 5 percent slopes (#31) The following presents a brief description of the soil types mapped for the subject property: Adam sville-Sparr fine sand (#2) is a nearly level, somewhat poorly drained soils on low ridges on the uplands and low knolls on the flatwoods. Typically the surface layer of this soil type is grayish brown fine sand about 4 inches thick. In most years, the seasonal high water table for this soil type is at a depth of 12 to 36 inches for up to 6 months. The permeability of Adamsville soil is rapid. The permeability of Sparr soil is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers and is slow or moderately slow in the subsoil. Basinger and Smyrna fine sands, depressional (#11) are nearly level, very poorly drained soils found in depressions. Typically the surface layer of Basinger soil consists of black mucky fine sand about 5 inches thick. Typically the surface layer of Smyrna soil consists of black fine sand about 2 inches thick. During most years undrained areas of this soil unit are ponded for 6 to 9 months. The permeability of Basinger soil is rapid. The permeability of Smyrna soil is rapid in the surface and subsurface, moderate or moderately rapid in the subsoil, and rapid in the substratum. Myakka and EauGallie fine sands (#20) are nearly level, poorly drained soils found on broad plains on the flatwoods. Typically the surface layer of Myakka soil consists of black fine sand about 5 inches thick. Typically the surface layer of EauGallie soil consists of dark gray fine sand about 5 inches thick. During most years the seasonal high table for this soil type is within 12 inches of the surface for 1 to 4 months. The permeability of Myakka soil is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers and in the substratum and moderate or moderately rapid in the subsoil. The permeability of EauGallie soil is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers, moderate or moderately rapid in the sandy part of the subsoil and moderately slow in the loamy part of the subsoil. Udorthents, excavated (#26) consist of excavated areas of unconsolidated or heterogeneous soil and geologic materials, which have been removed mainly for use in road construction or as fill material in low areas and for building foundations. Most areas of Udorthents, excavated locally called borrow pits, are from 5 to 40 feet deep. Some of the pit bottoms are seasonally ponded. Most pit areas have been left idle. These areas must be smoothed, shaped, and filled if they are to be used for agricultural or for urban development. Bio-Tech Consulting Inc. l nvirgne ntat and Permitting Services Mike Plante, L.D. Plante,Inc. LD Plante Winter Springs Site-Seminole County, Florida(BTC File#178-19.05) Preliminary Environmental Assessment Page 3 of 9 St. Johns and EauGallie fine sands (#29) are nearly level, poorly drained soils found on low broad plains on the flatwoods. Typically, St. Johns soil has a surface layer of black fine sand about 12 inches thick. EauGallie soil has a surface layer of black fine sand about 3 inches thick. During most years, the soils in this map unit have a seasonal high water table within 12 inches of the surface for 1 to 4 months. The permeability of St. Johns soil is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers and in the substratum, and is moderate or moderately slow in the subsoil. The permeability of EauGallie soil is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers. It is moderate or moderately slow in the sandy part of the subsoil, and slow or very slow in the loamy part of the subsoil. Tavares-Millhopper fine sands, 0 to 5 percent slopes (#31) are nearly level to gently sloping, moderately well drained soils found on low ridges and knolls on the uplands. Typically the surface layer of Tavares soil consists of very dark grayish brown fine sand about 6 inches thick. Typically the surface layer of Millhopper soil consists of gray fine sand about 7 inches thick. The soils in this map unit have a seasonal high table at a depth of 36 to 60 inches for 2 to 6 months. The permeability of Tavares soil is rapid or very rapid. The permeability of Millhopper soil is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers and moderately slow in the subsoil. The Florida Association of Environmental Soil Scientists (FAESS) considers the main components of Basinger and Smyrna fine sands, depressional (#11) as a hydric soil type. Furthermore, the FAESS considers inclusions present in Myakka and EauGallie fine sands (#20), Udorthents, excavated (#26) and St. Johns and EauGallie fine sands (#29) as hydric. This information can be found in the Hydric Soils of Florida Handbook, Third Edition (March, 2000). LAND USE TYPES/VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES The LD Plante Winter Springs Site currently supports eight (8) land use types/vegetative communities within it's boundaries. These land use types were identified utilizing the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System, Level III (FLUCFCS, FDOT, January 1999) (Figure 5). The uplands within the subject property consist of Professional Services (143), Improved Pasture (211), Woodland Pasture (213), Temperate Hardwood (425), and Roads & Highways (814). The wetland/surface water types consist of Streams & Waterways (510), Reservoirs less than 10 acres which are dominant features (534), and Mixed Wetland Hardwoods (617). The following provides a brief description of the land use types/vegetative communities identified on the site: Bio-Tech Consulting Inc. l nvirgne ntat and Permitting Services Mike Plante, L.D. Plante,Inc. LD Plante Winter Springs Site-Seminole County, Florida(BTC File#178-19.05) Preliminary Environmental Assessment Page 4 of 9 Uplands: 143 Professional Services A small tract of land within the central portion of the property may best be classified as Professional Services (143), per the FLUCFCS. Access to this portion of the property is gained via Railroad Avenue. Currently, this area consists of a paved parking area, a large open air storage building, and two (2) mobile office units associated with Daybreak Landscape, Inc. 211 Improved Pasture The majority of the subject property's upland community may best be classified as Improved Pasture (211), per the FLUCFCS. This community is located primarily within the northern portion of the property, both east and west of the Seminole County Trail System. One (1) large area of improved pasture is located along the southern boundary of the property. Vegetative species identified within this area consist predominantly of bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum), ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia), dogfennel (Eupatorium capillifolium), tropical soda-apple (Solanum viarum), and arrowleaf sida (Sides rhombifolia) throughout the groundcover; with widely scattered live oak (Quercus virginiana), laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), sweetgum (Liquidambar styracifZua), and cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto). Within this community exists a number of pens, corals, stables, barns, and ancillary buildings. Cattle are currently utilizing these areas for grazing; being rotated through the different pastures. 213 Woodland Pasture The second largest of the subject property's upland community may best be classified as Woodland Pasture (213), per the FLUCFCS. This community is located within the southwest and southeast portions of the property. As with the Improved Pasture community, groundcover vegetation consists of bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum), ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia), dogfennel (Eupatorium capillifolium), tropical soda-apple (Solanum viarum), and arrowleaf sida (Sides rhombifolia). However, the Woodland Pasture contains a greater density/coverage of canopy species such as live oak (Quercus virginiana), laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), and cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), with scattered camphor (Camphora cinnamomum) and earpod tree (Enterolobium cyclocarpum). Bio-Tech Consulting Inc. l nvirgne ntat and Permitting Services Mike Plante, L.D. Plante,Inc. LD Plante Winter Springs Site-Seminole County, Florida(BTC File#178-19.05) Preliminary Environmental Assessment Page 5 of 9 425 Temperate Hardwood A small portion of the subject property may best be classified as Temperate Hardwood (425), per the FLUCFCS. This community is located within the western portion of the property, between the property's reservoir and Tuskawilla Road, and also within the eastern portion of the property, north of State Road 434. Dominant vegetative species consist of live oak (Quercus virginiana), laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), camphor (Camphora cinnamomum), sweetgum (Liquidambar styracifZua), cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), and red maple (Ater rubrum); with a sparse understory of dwarf palmetto (Sabal minor), saw palmetto (Serenoa repens), muscadine vine (Vitis rotundifolia), greenbriar (Smilax spp), bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum). 814 Roads &Highways The final of the subject property's upland communities may best be classified as Roads & Highways (814), per the FLUCFCS. This community is directly associated with the two (2) paved road systems/right-of-ways that provide access to the property from S.R. 434; Garden Avenue and Railroad Avenue. Wetlands/Surface Waters: 510 Streams & Waterways A number of ditch systems extend through the subject property and adjacent to the interior roadways (Garden Avenue & Railroad Avenue) that may best be classified as Streams & Waterways (510), per the FLUCFCS. Although most of the ditch systems associated with the property are considered as roadside ditches, there is a large ditch system located adjacent to the Seminole County Trail System that bisects the property. This ditch system outfalls into the property's large, forested wetland within its northeastern portion via an upland excavated ditch. Additionally, a number of upland cut ditch systems extend through the eastern improved pasture, outfalling into the above referenced wetland. 534 Reservoirs Along the western boundary of the subject property, just east of Tuskawill Road, exists a small surface water system that would best be classified as a Reservoir — less than 10 acres but dominant feature (534), per the FLUCFCS. Vegetative species identified within this system consist of Carolina willow (Salix caroliniana), elderberry (Sambucus canadensis), sea myrtle (Bacharis hamilifolia), Chinese tallow (Triadica sebifera), cattail (Typha spp), primrose willow (Ludwigia peruviana), blackberry (Rubus spp), softrush (Juncus effusus), spikerush (Eleocharis spp), maidencane (Panicum hemitomon), common three-square (Scirpus pungens), dotted Bio-Tech Consulting Inc. l nvirgne ntal and Permitting Services Mike Plante, L.D. Plante,Inc. LD Plante Winter Springs Site-Seminole County, Florida(BTC File#178-19.05) Preliminary Environmental Assessment Page 6 of 9 smartweed (Polygonum punctatum), southern beakrush (Rhynchospora microcarpa), and dogfennel (Eupatorium capillifolium). During the field inspection, standing water was observed within the interior of this system. 617 Mixed Wetland Hardwoods Located within the northern and northeastern portions of the overall property are wetland communities that may best be classified as Mixed Wetland Hardwoods (617), per the FLUCFCS. These forested wetlands can be described as moderate-to-high quality wetlands. Vegetative species indentified within this community consist of sweetgum (Liquidambar styracifZua), red maple (Ater rubrum), laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), loblolly bay (Gordonia lasianthus), water oak (Quercus nigra), pond cypress (Taxodium ascendens), blackgum (Nyssa sylvatica), cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), American elm (Ulmus Americana), and yellow poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) throughout the canopy and sub-canopy; with a dense understory of cinnamon fern (Osmunda cinnamomea), southern shield fern (Thelypteris kunthii), netted chain fern (Woodwardia areolata), and lizard's tail (Saururus cernuus). The wetlands were flagged using pink "Bio-Tech Consulting" flagging tape. The western-most wetland, Wetland 1, was delineated as W1A-1 thru W1A-14 and W1B-1 thru W1B-17. The eastern wetland, Wetland 2, has been delineated as W2-1 thru W2-7. The northern wetland, Wetland 3, has been delineated as W3-1 thru W3-16. All surface water ditches are to be identified via survey at top-of-bank. At this time a Petition for a Formal Wetland and Surface Water Determination is being completed for submittal to the St. Johns River Water Management District. PROTECTED SPECIES Utilizing methodologies outlined in the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FFWCC) Gopher Tortoise Permitting Guidelines (revised June 2011) an assessment for"listed" floral and faunal species occurring within the subject property boundaries was conducted. This survey covered approximately 100% of the subject property. Particular attention was given to those listed species which have the potential to occur in Seminole County (see attached Table 1). The review included direct observations, as well as evidence of a particular species' presence such as tracks, burrows, tree markings and birdcalls. No plant species listed by either The Florida Department of Agriculture (FDA) or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) were identified on the site during the assessment conducted. The following is a list of those wildlife species identified during the evaluation of the property: Bio-Tech Consulting Inc. l nvirgne ntat and Permitting Services Mike Plante, L.D. Plante,Inc. LD Plante Winter Springs Site-Seminole County, Florida(BTC File#178-19.05) Preliminary Environmental Assessment Page 7 of 9 Reptiles and Amphibians black racer (Coluber constrictor) brown anole (Anolis sagrei) fence lizard (Sceloporus undulatus) gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) green anole (Anolis carohniana) Birds Black Vulture (Coragyps atratus) Blue Jay (Cyanocitta cristata) Common Grackle (Quiscalus quiscula) Carolina Wren (Thryothorus ludovicianus) Mourning Dove (Zenaida macroura) Northern Cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis) Northern Mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos) Mammals eastern gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) nine-banded armadillo (Dasypus novemcinctus) raccoon (Procyon lotor) marsh rabbit(Sylvilagus palustris) Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginiana) One (1) of the above identified species is listed in the FFWCC's Official Lists - Florida's Endangered Species, Threatened Species and Species of Special Concern (October, 2011). This species is the gopher tortoise. The gopher tortoise is currently "listed" as "Threatened". The following provides a brief description of this species as it relates to development of the property. Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) State Listed as "Threatened" Currently the gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) is classified as a "Category 2 Candidate Species" by USFWS, and as of September 2007 is now classified as "Threatened" by FFWCC, and as "Threatened" by FCREPA. The basis of the "Threatened" classification by the FFWCC for the gopher tortoise is due to habitat loss and destruction of burrows. Gopher tortoises are commonly found in areas with well-drained soils associated with the pine flatwoods, pastures and abandoned orange groves. Several other protected species known to occur in Orange County have a possibility of occurring in this area, as they are gopher tortoise commensal species. These species include the eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon corais couperi), Florida mouse (Podomys floridanus) and the gopher frog (Rana capito). However, none of these species Bio-Tech Consulting Inc. l nvirgne ntat and Permitting Services Mike Plante, L.D. Plante,Inc. LD Plante Winter Springs Site-Seminole County, Florida(BTC File#178-19.05) Preliminary Environmental Assessment Page 8 of 9 were observed during the survey conducted. A number of tortoise burrows was observed through-out the subject property. The subject property was surveyed for the existence of gopher tortoises through the use of pedestrian transects (Figures 6 & 7). The survey covered approximately 100% of the suitable habitat present within the subject property boundaries. Twenty-six (26) active/inactive gopher tortoise burrows were observed and recorded using GPS technology. Based on twenty-six (26) potentially occupied burrows, it is estimated that approximately sixteen (16) may be occupied by a tortoise. This number is based on the factored occupation rate of 0.614 (Auffenburg-Franz). Therefore, for the purpose of estimating costs associated with the subject project, as many as sixteen (16) gopher tortoises are estimated to occupy these burrows. The FFWCC provides three (3) options for developers that have gopher tortoises on their property. These options include: 1) avoidance (i.e., 25-foot buffer around burrow), 2) preservation of habitat, and 3) off-site relocation. As such, resolution of the gopher tortoise issue will need to be permitted through FFWCC prior to any construction activities. Based on the tortoise population that exists within the site and the expected development plan for the property (residential/commercial), there is only one potential option for resolving the gopher tortoise issue. This option is off-site relocation and would require that any tortosie within 25 feet of proposed construction activities be relocated off-site to an approved recipient site. For the twenty-six (26) gopher tortoise burrows, the estimated cost of off-site relocation is approximately $26,000.00 for the subject site; depending on the available recipient site at the time of permitting and the actual number of tortoises relocated. This cost includes a formal 100% gopher tortoise survey, permitting, excavation with a qualified biologist/FFWCC "authorized agent", and the recipient site fees. If relocation efforts cannot be completed within 90 days of a formal gopher tortoise survey, FFWCC requires an additional survey to be conducted. The fee for this additional survey is not included in the above cost estimate. Independent to the costs associated with gopher tortoise relocations (i.e., recipient site fees, excavation, silt fencing, transportation costs, etc.), FFWCC will be assessing a $200.00 fee for the first five (5) gopher tortoises and $300.00 per tortoise fee for all remaining on-site tortoises. Based on the estimated tortoise, the subject development site would be required to pay a one time fee of $3,500.00, paid to FFWCC prior to obtaining any permit (i.e., off-site relocation permits). This FFWCC mitigation fee requirement began after April 2009. Bio-Tech Consulting Inc. l nvirgne ntat and Permitting Services Mike Plante, L.D. Plante,Inc. LD Plante Winter Springs Site-Seminole County, Florida(BTC File#178-19.05) Preliminary Environmental Assessment Page 9 of 9 Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) USFWS Listed as "Threatened" In addition to the on-site review for "listed" species, BTC conducted a review of the FFWCC's recorded Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) nest sites on or in the vicinity of the subject property. This review revealed three (3) Bald Eagle nests, through the 2010-2011 nesting season, within one mile of the subject site. These nests, Nest SE-002, Nest SE-003, and Nest SE- 087, are all located greater than 660' from any portion of the subject property. As such, no restrictions towards the development of the site will apply. The environmental limitations described in this document are based on observations and technical information available on the date of the on-site evaluation. This report is for general planning purposes only. The limits of any on-site wetlands/surface waters can only be determined and verified through field delineation and/or on-site review by the pertinent regulatory agencies. The wildlife surveys conducted within the subject property boundaries do not preclude the potential for any listed species, as noted on Table 1 (attached), currently or in the future. Should you have any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact our office at(407) 894-5969. Thank you. Regards, c Stephen Butler Project Manager John Miklos President attachments Bio-Tech Consulting Inc. l nvirgne ntat and Permitting Services k: Legend i LID Plante WS Property �-1 �-- I"I r}': a ord -- - -- 417 17 ti' h :: �•••• .f:�1 } 434 rk:• :t . �'t . r' 'rx ' :t L__-__-..-__ V J } J _ L f I { I ter .S ri - 419 Shams I �r I Natures Way C'3VIe'do I LJ Milky Way _ 4r I 434 k- 3 Gulfstar Dr - 'lofia.ct 0 a° m' j.Gasa Park Gir O �a I �� 426 434 � ;U 6a��G Yellow Pine Ct o 3 G Ayers Wood Ct ° GapoQ� c Northern Way LD Plante WS Site N 1 8,500 Feet Bio-Tech Consulting Inc. Seminole County, Florida W E Project #:178-19 Environmental and Permitting Services 2002 E.Robinson St. Orlando,FL 32803 Figure 1 Produced By: SEB Ph: 407-894-5969 69 Fax: 407-894-5970 Location Map Date:5/8/2012 wwwbio-techconsulting.com S 99 __ Legend - r G LLoon k ■ - L 1 'LID Plante WS Property 6 N IL 4L �r1 rir �• � � � ,a ; 1 Irrsxx� - _ + t ry u -� _ I J r .L L ■-� r.� ti ■ h JJ �n� JJ J .11V J I Ell[[[[[[[[[r[� { L _ ■ MdE - * LJ A J r IL r ILA, 6166 -= T3 [[F' -[[[ r G" r A 5 r • J ' 540 LD Plante WS Site N 1 Feet �Bio-Tech Consulting Inc. Seminole County, Florida W E Project #:178-19 Environmental and Permitting Services 2002 E.Robinson St. Orlando,FL 32803 Aerial 2 Produced By: SEB Ph: bio-echco s Fax: 407-894-5970 2009 '` erial Photograph S Date:5/8/2012 www.bio-techconsulting.com •'�y�? � ':'�}�;.ti�:�'• •' �r •ti�� :�{•:��r r t;ti.•:.�•:.•••:}� r :?fry' •�•'r�'�' •�'r•.:�v�'�:: •:'•. �:'r? �r•' r. . y' ':�•'��':�:•.tir::::r1•'r.:::•:: Legend v�t'.•rti f�':.;=:k:'' ':k :'r"r V ?h r --' _ N?} °'k..•:. ? Vf:1.•r:V �•k irk,,ti u n LID Plante WS Property fir:�.� �'.r�� '•1k�::�:•••'• •.•}•;.:� ,:•:� �•;k•.• r•}••. :•.•�.••�•'.4�. 7. r � ;_ . • tip:y:'�• 'rti:.y:rr: '��' ' _ 7. ��k :•�•v;�, Nk•ti �ti.'k •':f.h�•f'�'�••���• •:�.f�:;�,�:,.k•: '•f•r•:k ti:�:�ti��;::: N�k r:�; . .r}�.�. � - •:.• Yom'` : 1�����+�i�•.:,ti'�,.. '�ti�:�}r•. _ �• Is ::' 1 F. I •f' - y ti 1 '� ; i '1 y �•t '��i1 i r • } _ _ _ X51 .ry� I I y�'I rF _ _ _t rti� I _ •� % '•' '•i _ ' �� Iti k,��' 1�� I � _ � TS _�'•f' ~v t•1 �� . ti_--- �Y ••k � � � i; I . � I iii �� {.:`• —� ' r f �r' —�I �•��, �r• — — _ 9cr I % M r i ri - •. ti li rr .f� I — �' .. - 'ti �i� + * �� i i r•ti _ ..- _I f.r �1k� •I y r f ' � } 4 a t it k r '%: ' ' -N,- , r%.- �r�y rr % r 4 �r � r,�"'' • �'}ti��'I'k���I •1•I i A� f •� '•1 '� � f5 � -r - - _ f I % I .�y ti 'f": 1r r—ti I I err y ti•:.f.•` f 4 f '' �. k �1r`r r � � •�� ',; -ly � y r 'N�� � '� _ � r tik - •I. . fr��} k f k --i -5 I 1p i; iy -f: f '�' �- -y i y' �' ti ti -- r �.•1 �� 4 17, . . .�•�ir :;N .?. •r. +c +�� �. :�_{�,{ ti� ��•. '_° { �r• •f r• J r' •• � - �i _ - - { � ' i JL r :�• i s+ % ' �.�- •.: : ; . �_�� � tih � '1i� �••� fir•-,,. _ � �, _ y1l "- - fir . ' ��. r �•y t'i ..'� �'��! �• _yr' {��.ti_ �_#1r�-�_-_ �{•_, "�,� _f i � x�-� � • ... .•.:. VI�'•max i :':�: 5 i •' aI� f� ~ k{�f �L _r r �% I LD Plante WS Site N 2,800 Feet Bin-Tech Consulting Inc. Seminole County, Florida W E Project #:178-19 Environmental and Permitting Services 2 2002 E.Robinson St. Orlando,FL 32803 Figure 3 Produced By: SEB Ph: bio-echco s Fax: 407-894-5970 USGS Topographic Map Date:5/8/2012 wwwbio-techconsulting.com S ' Legend LID Plante WS Property ,L Soil Symbol, Soil Name r L,oCCC�4❑ yN - 2,ADAMSVILLE-SPARR FINE SANDS 11, BASINGER AND SMYRNA FINE SANDS, DEPRESSIONAL r' TrrF' 20, MYAKKAAND EAUGALLIE FINE SANDS I 26, UDORTHENTS, EXCAVATED 29, ST JOHNS AND EAUGALLIE FINE SANDS 1 t� ++ 31, TAVARES-MILLHOPPER FINE SANDS, 0 TO 5 PERCENT SLOPES 1 I - � 1 - ti .6• 4J, M - M6 IL �I� ■ JJJ 'C � �� - ar L JJ 0 u il`VI � J� !'1 16 ' r ` - �•- I r _ .r .,till ' rLrrrr rrrrrrrr IIIIIII* -Lux:I r r � -z"- r�rr irl r w LD Plante WS Site N 1 540 Feet Bio-Tech Consulting Inc. Seminole County, Florida W E Project #:178-19 Environmental and Permitting Services 2002 E.Robinson St. Orlando,FL 32803 q 1�FTigure 4 Produced By: SEB Ph: bio-echco s Fax: 407-894-5970 USD '` -'` RCS Soils Map S Date:5/8/2012 www.bio-techconsulting.com - Legend o LID Plante WS Property F J711 - Professional Services (143) 6. Improved Pasture (211) w 0 A Woodland Pasture (213) Temperate Hardwood (425) Streams &Waterways (510) �1+,� L Reservoir(534) _}• ; ��_ 425 - i "{ * {5 Mixed Wetland Hardwoods (617) ' ' '~ Roads & Highways (814) J;AJg - '� 534 � � #�•.. '� f N JJ , ` c,42 s n y .F N �',vti ��o� . f � ° 61.7 u s - '_ H �YJ 8142'11 = . 211 5to, 510 •� � � "J �5i1i0 —143 ,' •.� � ti L11 — 2+13 r .�� 2+11 ' �• - r r IL , J CLLL�.LLLLir 14. L LLLLLLLLL L2LL T[7 LLLLLLT 64- � � i •_ } LLi LC�LLLLL7�,�LLi yyyyu}}}}r LLLL J. 1 �i � Fr LD Plante WS Site N 590 Feet Blo-Tech Consulting Inc. Seminole County, Florida W E Project #:178-19 Environmental and Permitting Services 2002 E.Robinson St. Orlando,FL 32803 T TFigure 5 Produced By: SEB Ph: bio-echco s Fax: 407-894-5970 FLIJCF''CS Map Date:5/8/2012 wwwbio-techconsulting.com S Legend �oo��� LID Plante WS Property 1 © c �� GT Burrows (26) V, 9E rd N .��oo�a� � T• � 'i � �, H r f, rr }ti +l b� y Zr ' N J � ' •'I JJ - - _ n . ,p - .`tip. turiurui=rz� � ���r '' ti �� - � ti _, AR its •�� 'F ti jJJ � _ 5 1'- n r r � •r IL r IF ix «L L { Fr- - i 0 1 •� � LD Plante WS Site N 590 Feet Blo-Tech Consulting Inc. Seminole County, Florida W E Project #:178-19 Environmental and Permitting Services 2002 E.Robinson St. Orlando,FL 32803 Figure V Produced By: SEB Ph: bio-echco s Fax: 407-894-5970 GT Burrow Map Date:5/8/2012 wwwbio-techconsulting.com S Legend F, LID Plante WS Property r r »»Li C L �� . Track Log (4-27-2012) N �e T• � ' -r 1_ ti 16 r i RL I ' N ' } F• � H � i,� ' h�. A JJ JJ '�' ' �i JJ — �`i � JJ ItV f i ■1 IL / r � DELL Fr- LLL L , _ � r J6. r4 i � LD Plante WS Site N 590 Feet Blo-Tech Consulting Inc. Seminole County, Florida w E Project #:178-19 Environmental and Permitting Services 2002 E.Robinson St. Orlando,FL 32803 r Figure 7 Produced By: SEB Ph: bio-echco s Fax: 407-894-5970 Wllldlile Survey TranSect Date:5/8/2012 wwwbio-techconsulting.com S Table 1: Potentially Occurring Listed Wildlife and Plant Species in Seminole County, Florida Scientific Name Common Name Federal State Occurrence Status Status Status FISH Pteronotro is welaka bluenose shiner N LS C AMPHIBIANS Rana ca ito gopher frog N LS P REPTILES Alligator mississippiensis American alligator T(S/A) LS C rymarchon corais eastern indigo snake LT LT C cou eri Go herus polyphemus gopher tortoise N LS C Pituophis melanoleucus Florida pine snake N LS C mu itus I ilosoma extenuatum short-tailed snake N LT P BIR17S Eudocimus albus white ibis N LS P Falco sparverius paulus southeastern American N LT P kestrel Haliaeetus leucocephalus bald eagle LT LT C M cteria americana wood stork LE LE P ramus guarauna lim kin N LS P Egretta caerulea little blue heron N LS C Egretta thula snowy egret N LS C Egretta tricolor tricolored heron N LS C Falco peregrinus peregrine falcon LE LE P icoides borealis red-cockaded woodpecker LE LT C phelocoma Florida scrub jay LT LT C coerulescens Grus canadensis Florida sandhill crane N LT C ratensis Pandion haliaetus osprey N LS** C MAMMALS Podom s oridanus Florida mouse N LS C Sciurus ni er shermani Sherman's fox squirrel N LS C Trichechus manatus manatee LE LE C Ursus americanus Florida black bear C LT** C oridanus PLANTS ennstaedtia bipinnata hay scented fern N LE C Lechea cernua nodding inweed N LT C Carex cha manii Cha man's Sedge N LE C Centrosema arenicola Sand Butterfly Pea N LE C Cucurbita Okeechobee Gourd LE LE C okeechobeensis Ophioglossum palmatum Hand Fern N LE C Illicium parvi florum star anise N LE C Lechea cernua nodding inweed I N LT C Salix oridana Florida willow I N LE C FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS LE-Endangered: species in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range. LT-Threatened: species likely to become Endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range. E(S/A)-Endangered due to similarity of appearance to a species which is federally listed such that enforcement personnel have difficulty in attempting to differentiate between the listed and unlisted species. T(S/A)-Threatened due to similarity of appearance(see above). PE-Proposed for listing as Endangered species. PT-Proposed for listing as Threatened species. C-Candidate species for which federal listing agencies have sufficient information on biological vulnerability and threats to support proposing to list the species as Endangered or Threatened. XN-Non-essential experimental population. MC-Not currently listed,but of management concern to USFWS. N-Not currently listed,nor currently being considered for listing as Endangered or Threatened. STATE LEGAL STATUS-ANIMALS LE-Endangered: species,subspecies,or isolated population so few or depleted in number or so restricted in range that it is in imminent danger of extinction. LT-Threatened: species,subspecies,or isolated population facing a very high risk of extinction in the future. LS-Species of Special Concern is a species,subspecies,or isolated population which is facing a moderate risk of extinction in the future. PE-Proposed for listing as Endangered. PT-Proposed for listing as Threatened. PS-Proposed for listing as Species of Special Concern. N-Not currently listed,nor currently being considered for listing. STATE LEGAL STATUS-PLANTS LE-Endangered: species of plants native to Florida that are in imminent danger of extinction within the state,the survival of which is unlikely if the causes of a decline in the number of plants continue;includes all species determined to be endangered or threatened pursuant to the U.S.Endangered Species Act. LT-Threatened: species native to the state that are in rapid decline in the number of plants within the state,but which have not so decreased in number as to cause them to be Endangered. PE-Proposed for listing as Endangered. PT-Proposed for listing as Threatened. N-Not currently listed,nor currently being considered for listing. COUNTY OCCURRENCE STATUS Vertebrates and Invertebrates: C=Confirmed P=Potential N=Nesting Plants: C=Confirmed R=Reported " Attachment "F" Incorporated 1454 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs,FL 32708 Telephone(407)327-1800 Fax: (407)327-4756 September 23, 2013 Property Address - 150' From Subject Property Re: Subject Property - Tax Parcel Identification Numbers: 06-21-31-501-OA00-0000 06-21-31-501-01100-0000 26-20-30-5AR-OA00-008G 26-20-30-5AR-OA00-008C 06-21-31-501-0200-0000 06-21-31-501-OP00-0000 26-20-30-5AR-OA00-0080 01-21-30-501-0000-0340 01-21-30-501-0000-0170 Dear Mr., Pursuant to Section 20-28 (b) (3), Code of Ordinances, the City of Winter Springs is forwarding to your attention a copy of the notice of Annexation, Large Scale Plan Amendment, and Rezoning for the aforementioned Seminole County Tax Identification Numbers for property herein referred to as the 'Plante Property'. The subject property is located east of Tuskawilla Road and south of State Road 434 (see Exhibit A - Location Map). A future land use amendment and rezoning of the subject property to a City of Winter Springs future land use and zoning designation are proposed in conjunction with this annexation request as follows: Seminole County ExItting Future Land Use Existing Zoning Industrial A-1 &M-1 City of Winter Springs Proposed Future Land Use Proposed Zoning Town Center Town Center Adjacent Property Notification Letter Plante Property Pg. 2 The current schedule for the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs to consider the Annexation and Large Scale Plan Amendment is as follows: • Local Planning Agency - Wednesday, October 2, 2013 at 5:30 or soon thereafter in the Commission Chambers, Winter Springs City Hall. • First Reading — Monday, October 28, 2013 at 5:15 or soon thereafter in the Commission Chambers, Winter Springs City Hall. • Second Reading —Monday, January 27, 2014 at 5:15 or soon thereafter on the Commission Chambers, Winter Springs City Hall. Please note that this schedule is subject to change. If there are any questions or clarifications necessary, please feel free to contact me by telephone at (407) 327-5967 or via email at rwoodruff2winterspringsfl.org. Sincerely, _Z11 4--- W Randy Woodruff, AICP Senior Planner Enclosures: Exhibit A- Location Map CC: Randy Stevenson, AICP, ASLA, Community Development Director ATTACHMENT "All LEGEND UNINCORPORATED AREA TO BE ANNEXED Cross Seminole Trail PARCEL TAX ID ACREAGE 1 06-21-31-501-OAOO-0000 5.23 2 06-21-31-501-OBOO-0000 4.20 3 26-20-30-5AR-OA00-008G 1.25 4 26-20-30-5AR-OA00-008C 12.56 5 06-21-31-501-0200-0000 2.12 6 06-21-31-501-OPOO-0000 1.23 7 26-20-30-5AR-OA00-0080 19.16 8 01-21-30-501-0000-0340 10.91 9 01-21-30-501-0000-0170 3.42 lw ii� Bop ����e lases! now i"a� �rfandcsentinei Tftr5slayS�ptner1 ��ES1 5 A d Tease tuCrr to F�dga�� s � � G H17 � rho Eity of Wrner Sprrrigsrapoes is�dapiCr fa[CowCrf 4rdfnnces QRCtINR�IEE N[t 2fl13�� ;: ; dtH QCif3tN SNEt QF THE EITY Edi�MISS I[N QF THE.,EIS€0 ,WINTER SP —CO UAY,FLORID kk FiHAT INGTtIEQMPHEH�IdSIVE PLANNrNGy PRQ�I[i1Nt�i:Q {Ity�F'�[a#�. QF AID OMEN TO rHE EltTt1RE AN lIS MIiP :@l CIESIG ATIN Er Tl4f{ R [ PROPEAr1�WITH[Pt TtiE CITY,,,]"'t1F W[NTER SPI�fNGS QESCRISI[� AS Nl�llr fs� PARCEL dos EQ�trltrN�yl�N{G 6 GRas A�cr t , MQF�RE"�{OFC+*EEESS AxNG(sGENry �A�y� C�i[c Q}A!�F( $QDTH Uf STATE RQAi ![FIC7 I A5T Q TIfS[(AWILEA RQAity J [4:CitJ OG[Ir IVIi111E PAEiT[EIrLARL1� DEr. GTE ANA�t SERI�ED ON EXHIRI­ ATtl1ENEl� HERET(1 FI QM 5I MINOkt?EOUN Y"`INI t STRIAt'y TQ Q OF W(NTF SPRINGS`k�UINN CENTER" PRQVIO FQI THE REPEAL_OF PRIQNT INEQNi[STENY ORQINAtICI 51[ND RESOLUTIQNS� INEQFI QRATIk I IItTQ; HE #{IMPREHENSIV>: Paw rkIr1F� AMID AN E F�ETrVE QArE AN[ LEGE�d SrATU E)F T El L AMENQMI Nr OtIiQINANE2tt13 T�&2tf�3 � : .' EXHIBIT rfA, rcao- QRrY1kANEE-1W 2Qi�tG ![N Q4�UrN#If�EGff�rN�Cir1l EONIMCSSIGC�Q�r�CE Etr1f QF WINTEF�5PR1Nt�rSX SEMI�IOLE EQtf�Tl� Ff:OttC�A� CUANGING'.THEON[Nt MAR QIIGNATI([IT GF FII AE �ROC'ERTY ONSTLTUtiNC`NIIV4 PAR€t t QI~ LANQ ,TQTAtINCE BQ AERES� NtQRE 0 fLE55 GENECf iL I�t QfiAT t SQUTH €1F STArE RQAiI 434 ANA t A5 Q TuSIEAVftClkt A RO IN iHt«SCf1FQ #NItIE15l rRtNGSFLQfitl SyCEPtEECiANiElif lt ` I� Sti18ErFt[ EXIiISi fFlklF AEHE HI RI TQ, 1_AO 15 SEMIC QL quC " Jfi'GRICUL 1RAr." ANtr "f , It (}ttS RtAL°� [ Wll 1Fl 91 (fit s "Y wl tR N tf�STRr j PRQ f[t1IN OCt THE REPEAL QF PR OR INCONSISTENT QRQINANEES AN[ RESQLtIrION$y SEVERABIttT AND AN EFF,EErtVrlArle, The t oval PCarrttin Agertcy wl tonddcC a publtc Irearrng©rt the urd MAT eg a Nf dnesd� Qciaber , 201,3 at vj3RIVC o soap tfier8afta>r to tho C4mrnrssra�r Etram6eks Igcaie#4t Wrote SprCngs Crier l allk 7trEasLSiaC RoatCd y"VIA Fe�5pr�n0s FI&I 3 d TCra Erly Eommrssroa wrlC e4nduci a public hearing afttha ardrnances 4t Iit4nda ,Qctah48k X013 at 515 P M or saa n iCrereaff r�r th4 Eamr #scan€f��r�C�a: Casaied ai WC ter:S�rldq EI*Hal 1128 East Siate Piaad d34�Winter Sprtngsf l`(4rrr�aF 3�70R� Th4 prop6sed ordlnanr; s mad be 4bfairred am rnsPe�fed b tlta ul7fi between S a m and G mr Monda�C tf�ra�rgCr I ridgy, at ttte lit 's Eletk�s€]ffr�e, [0caacC a2f E Ski 434 Wrnfer Springs FCorrda Far mare mormatrorr, calf47 32T80II 22 Willi,an wrtf drsabilt[as neern assfstanc far tsartr � a#a rn any of tea �redrng sCi4ui coital tCre tnpCQyae eCatron a?e artment ogrdrnat, 48 hoes rr attvanen oi,th mae#ink a 4Q7}327 1$Q4 X238 these ar, pubirG_hearings interested patres are advlse€t fFrat th � ppear a�t�o meet�rgs and��heard�srrtft respeett�fCe proposed o€dri�artces Put�t�anf to seef�err 286 fti U5a F[arrda 5#a#u#es pCease f}4 advised#hat rt a persorr decides trr appear and ,.c�esrsrvr�rrtade Isy frta tasty a�#free meefings, ne ar sCia may need_t�ensued that a verbatrr�