HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011 05 09 Consent 202 State Revolving Fund Loan Resolution 2011-18COMMISSION AGENDA
ITEM 202
May 9, 2011
Meeting
CONSENT X
INFORMATIONAL
PUBLIC HEARING
REGULAR
MGR KS /DEPT KL
Authorization
REQUEST: Utility Department requesting Approval of Resolution 2011 -18 Relating to the
State Revolving Loan Fund Application for the Construction of the Lake Jesup
Reclaimed Water Augmentation Project
SYNOPSIS: This Resolution is required for the City to be able to complete an application for the
Lake Jesup Reclaimed Water Augmentation Project to be considered for the State
Revolving Loan Fund
CONSIDERATIONS:
The City has recently been notified by the State of an improved chance to receive
State Revolving Loan Fund monies for the construction of the Lake Jesup Reclaimed Water
Augmentation Project. This resolution is required as part of the application package due
June 1, 2011.
Staff is pursuing this financing option along with the bank note previously presented
by the Finance Director. The SRF loan amount listed in the application is $3.5 million.
Contract A —Oak Forest Storage and Pumping is nearing completion at a cost of $1.6
million which was fronted from reserves. Contract B is currently out to bid and includes the
Lake Jesup intake structure, pumping, filtration and a small storage tank. It is estimated to
cost $2.5 million. When a contingency is added the District grant is factored in, the $3.5
million estimate is reached. It is likely the actual need will be significantly less given the
various financing alternatives being researched.
The City will know if it is deemed eligible for SRF financing after the State's August
hearing. Staff anticipates bringing all financing options to the Commission in late August or
early September for a final decision. Although this resolution authorizes the Mayor to sign
City Commission — Regular Meeting
April 25, 2011
Consent Agenda Item #202
Page 2 of 3
the loan agreement and associated documents, this issue will be brought back to the
Commission before proceeding.
The State also requested an update to the previously approved Reclaimed Water
Augmentation Project document prepared by CPH Engineers. This Supplemental Planning
Document as amended April 29, 2011 is attached for your information.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact from approving this resolution because the City
Commission will have the opportunity to consider whether to proceed with the SRF
financing option when the rates, terms and conditions are known. Staff supports keeping
this option open as the SRF low interest loan could provide significant savings to the
residents. As a comparison, the estimated SRF loan interest rate today would be about
2.96% whereas a bank note would be in the range of 4.2 %.
COMMUNICATION EFFORTS:
This Agenda Item Has Been Electronically Forwarded To The Mayor And City
Commission, City Manager, City Attorney /Staff, And All eAlert /eCitizen Recipients; And Is
Available On The City's Website, LaserFiche, And The City's Server. Additionally,
Portions Of This Agenda Item Are Typed Verbatim On The Respective Meeting Agenda
Which Has Also Been Electronically Forwarded To The Individuals Noted Above; And
Which Is Also Available On The City's Website, LaserFiche, And The City's Server; Has
Been Sent To City Staff, Media /Press Representatives Who Have Requested
Agendas /Agenda Item Information, Homeowner's Associations /Representatives On File
With The City, And All Individuals Who Have Requested Such Information; And Has Been
Posted Outside City Hall; Posted Inside City Hall With Additional Copies Available For The
General Public; And Posted At Five (5) Different Locations Around The City. This Agenda
Item Is Also Available To Any New Individual Requestors. City Staff Is Always Willing To
Discuss This Or Any Agenda Item With Any Interested Individuals.
201105 09 Consent 202 SRF Loan Resolution
City Commission — Regular Meeting
April 25, 2011
Consent Agenda Item #202
Page 3 of 3
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Commission approve Resolution 2011 -18 authorizing
staff to proceed with the State Revolving Loan Fund application and authorize the City
Manager and City Attorney to prepare and execute any and all applicable documents
necessary to complete the application.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution 2011 -18
2. Reclaimed Water Augmentation Project Supplemental Planning Document as amended
April 29, 2011.
201105 09 Consent 202 SRF Loan Resolution
J J
Ll
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER
SPRINGS, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE STATE REVOLVING FUND
LOAN PROGRAM; MAKING FINDINGS; AUTHORIZING THE LOAN
APPLICATION; AUTHORIZING THE LOAN AGREEMENT; ESTABLISHING
PLEDGED REVENUES; DESIGNATING AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES;
PROVIDING ASSURANCE; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY,
AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
1 HEREAS, Florida Statutes provide for Loans to local government agencies to finance the construction of
water pollution control facilities; and
WHEREAS, Florida Administrative Code rules require authorization to apply for loans, to establish pledged
revenues, to designate an authorized representative; to provide assurances of compliance with loan program
requirements; and to enter into a loan agreement; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission accepts the findings of the Reclaimed Water Augmentation Project
Supplemental Planning Document as amended April 29, 2011; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission previously approved a Water & Wastewater Rate Study that projected the
revenues needed to construct the Lake Jesup Reclaimed Water Augmentation Project;
WHEREAS, the City Commission approved Ordinance 2009 -13 which implemented the rate increases
necessary to support the anticipated capital financing debt payments associated with the Lake Jesup Reclaimed Water
Project; and
WHEREAS, the State Revolving Loan Fund loan priority list designates Project No. WW59060 Lake Jesup
Reclaimed Water Augmentation Project as eligible for available funding; and
WHEREAS, the City of Winter Springs intends to enter into a loan agreement with the Department of
Environmental Protection under the State Revolving Fund for project financing.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs,
Florida as follows:
SECTION I — The foregoing findings are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof.
SECTION II — The City of Winter Springs, Florida is authorized to apply for a loan to finance the Project.
SECTION III — The revenues pledged for the repayment of the loan are net water and sewer utility system
revenues after payment of debt service on the City's outstanding Water and Sewer Bonds.
SECTION IV — The Mayor is hereby designated as the authorized representative to provide the assurances
and commitments required by the loan application.
SECTION V — The Mayor is hereby designated as the authorized representative to execute the loan
agreement which will become a binding obligation in accordance with its terms when signed by both parties.
The Mayor is authorized to represent the City in carrying out the City's responsibilities under the loan
agreement. The Mayor is authorized to delegate responsibility to appropriate City staff to carryout technical,
financial, and administrative activities associated with the loan agreement.
SECTION VI — The legal authority for borrowing moneys to construct this Project is Florida Statutes.
SECTION VII — Conflicts All resolutions or part of Resolutions in conflict with any of the provisions of this
Resolution are herby repealed.
SECTION VIII — Severability If any Section or portion of this Resolution proves to be invalid, unlawful, or
unconstitutional, it shall not be held to invalidate or impair the validity, force, or effect of any Section or part of
this Resolution.
SECTION IX — Effective Dates This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and
adoption.
PASSED AND DOPT ED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA, IN A REGULAR MEETING ASSEMBLED ON THE 9th
DAY OF MAY, 2011.
�n cc ff&e64 ff� J my /ur a "a ccr"4a
t/ 6eccGtd de d
CHARLES LACEY, MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
DATE: MAY 9 2011
h
g�LS -ruI UIZA
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
RECLAIMED WATER AUGMENTATION PROJECT
SUPPLEMENTAL PLANNING DOCUMENT
APRIL 2011
Amended April 29, 2011
Exwm
Pmmm
Abrehiteds
S
ombwWon Maxa
D epi RWB uild
Authorization No. 00003215
1117 E. Robinson Street
Orlando, Florida 32801
(407) 425 -0452
PH Project No. W0403.21
r
No. 20700
�v STATE OF C
ape ;1� L OROV'bb
CN
NAL
William G. Gouch er, P.E.
P.E. No. 20700
P.aNM*W
1r
n ee
CertifiC a fe of
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
RECLAIMED WATER AUGMENTATION PROTECT
SUPPLEMENTAL PLANNING DOCUMENT
I 1= 14491:1 61,111 VQW
Executive summary
1.0
General
1.1 Project Description
1.2 Planning Area
1.3 Service Area Census Tracts
1.4 Major Project Components
1.4. 1 Labe Jesup Treatment Facilities
1.4.2 Oak Forest Storage and Pumping
3
1.5 Need for the Project
4
2.0
Cost Comparison and selected Alternative
4
2.1 Previous Planning Documents
4
2.2 Alternatives and Estimated Casts
5
2.3 Selected Alternative
5
3.0
Environmental Review
6
3.1 Environmental Benefits
6
3.2 Environmental Impacts of the Selected Alternative
3.2.1 Threatened, Endangered, Proposed and
6
Candidate Species and Designated Critical Habitats
3.2.2 Surface Water Bodies
7
3.2.3 Prime Agricultural Lands
7
3.2.4 Wetlands
7
3.2.5 Minority and Low - income Communities
7
3.2.3 State Clearinghouse Review
7
4.0
Public Participation
3
5.0
Financial Feasibility
3
5.1 Capital Financing Plan
3
5.2 Wastewater Rates and Charges
3
6.0
Project Schedule
3
7.0
Project Authorization
9
8.0
Implementation
g
3.1 Pending Issues
g
8.2 Required Service or Intergovernmental Agreements
g
3.3 Required Permits
9
APPENDICES
A - 0 -year Consumptive Use Permit from the St Johns River Water Management
District
E - City of Winter Springs Reclaimed Water Augmentation Study, September
2005
- City of Winter Springs Labe Jesup Augmentation Preliminary Engineering
Report, December 2008
D - Engineer's Preliminary opinion of Probable Construction costs
E — Environmental Documents and Exhibits
F - section 19 Article III — Reclaimed Water System - of the City of Winter
Springs Code of ordinances
- Project Schedules
H - Public Meeting and Authorizing Resolution Documentation
I - Permits — Florida Department of Environmental Protection
IT'S of WINTER SPRINGS
RECLA IMED WA TER A UG MEN TA TION PROJEC T
SUPPLEMENTAL PLANNING DOCUMENT
EXECUTIVE sl1MMARY
In accordance with the city of Winter Springs Water Supply Plan, the city is proposing to
expand its reclaimed water system for residential irrigation to decrease the use of
groundwater for that purpose. The City has received a consumptive Use Permit from the St
Johns River Water Management District to withdraw up to an annual average of 2.23 million
gallons per day (MGM) of water from Lake Jesup and a nearby artesian well as reclaimed
water augmentation during peak demand periods. The Project will consist of the Lake Jesup
Reclaimed Dater Augmentation Facility for treating the water from Labe Jesup to the Public
Access level of treatment consistent with reclaimed water. The treatment w i l l consist of a
two -stage filtration process using automatic backwash i ng 80 micron mesh stainless steel pre-
filter followed by a 7 micron microfiber filter capable of producing water with less than 5
milligrams per liter (parts per million) of Total Suspended Solids (Ts). The water will be
disinfected with sodium hypochlorite solution prior to entry to a 240,000 gallons cast -in -place
storage tank, partially buried to reduce its visibility. High service variable speed pumps will
drag from the tank as required based on reduced pressures caused by demands on the
distribution system. A turbidimeter and chlorine residual analyzer will ensure that the water
leaving the facility meets reclaimed water TSS and chlorine residual standards, respectively.
Also a part of this project is the oak Forest Storage and Pumping Facility, located west of the
Oak Forest subdivision adjacent to the City's spray field sites. The oak Forest facility is
located between the City's west and East water Reclamation Facilities and central within the
distribution system. The oak Forest facility will act as a storage and booster pump station to
provide better pressure throughout the reclaimed water distribution system. The facility wil_
consist of a 3 million gallon pre - stressed concrete storage tank fed from the distribution
system through a pressure sustaining valve to maintain system pressures. Three variable
speed high service pumps will provide reclaimed water back into the distribution system at
higher pressures as pressure demands.
The primary environmental benefit of the project will be the offsetting of the need to withdraw
2.23 IVI D of high quality groundwater for irrigation, reserving it for drinking water. The Labe
,Jesup Reclaimed Water Augmentation Facility will benefit the water quality of "impaired"
Lake Jesup by removing up to 2.0 M D of the relatively polluted water. Its sto rmwate r
management system also is designed to remove pollutants from runoff that would normally
run off to the lake. The two portions of the project have been designed to not adversely
impact the environment, including its visual aspects with respect to impact on neighboring
homes.
The estimated construction cost of the total project is approximately $4,543,000. The oak
Forest storage and Pumping Contract "A" is currently under construction and SRF funding is
not being requested for that project. The total amount being requested is $3,001.631.
CITY of WINTER SPRINGS
RECLAIMED WATER AUGMENTATION PROJECT
SUPPLEMENTAL PLANNING DOCUMENT
1,0 G ENERAL
1.1 P roi ect Description
The project consists of the construction of two facilities; the Lake Jesup Reclaimed
Water Augmentation Facility, which will withdraw grater from the adjacent Lake
Jesup, treat, store and pump into the existing reclaimed water distribution system;
and the oak Forest storage and Pumping Facility, consisting of a 3 million gallon
storage tank and a high service booster pump station. The City has already been
issued a Consumptive Use Permit (CUP) from the St Johns liver Water
Management District (SJRWMD) to withdraw up to an annual average of 2.23
million gallons per day of water from Lake Jesup and a nearby artesian well
combined. A copy of this permit is included in Appendix A.
�I Planning Area
For the purposes of this project, the Planning Area is the City Limits of the City of
Winter springs. The area is shown on Exhibit A.
1.3 Service Area census Tracts
The Service Area /Planning Area census tracts are shown on Exhibit A.
1.4 Major Project Comp onents
1.4.1 Lake Jesup Treatment Facilities
An intake structure will be constructed from the shore into Lake Jesup on existing
City property. The structure will be constructed as an observation platform,
allowing the public to walk out and view the lakefront from the site on the crest side
of Central Winds Park. The intake piping will be under the walkway and the
observation platform at the end of the dock. The dock/walkway will be constructed
to protect the intake piping of the augmentation system from debris and boating
activity.
A low head pumping station will be rewired to lift the grater from Labe Jesup into
the treatment unit(s). This pumping system will initially include two pumps, but be
set up as a triplex station to allow for the future expansion of the augmentation
treatment system, and also provide for the back -up capabilities required for
environmental treatment facilities.
K
I
1 a
m �
D
r
i
Q
L
m
i
ly
ca
fR .�I
o
r �
0 0
K o
o
z
Dm
m 7 °
(1) z
I G)
3
G
G
1109f!A[ " Arrh rEY't'i "Imm"y" DOW. &13M
Pldmµerw LmmdmrnprArcjdtec!h
Firv[roNwrrafar s�f rya ■ Jab Flo. YM 141
7yfffflr/rrnmpo?rfljAm i Scok AS Sham
�t�n�ff'�C7�aar �nne�a�wt
1117East RabPuaww Stmt w10 ILNaVu
orrff"Uy n "m Ql 'VmA L
Mrauc M7 A2fi aM a-& t'a na
Far.: W7.641tIO36 (Lk- Na r.c�me�
Irk
MINE a
z .
WE
<Yl
c "n
ow-
-
■ II �_ X �{
Raw
y _+ - / If
_ 1 ., % �L 1
cl
..
!�•'-
r
DTI 'I — �..Y -•-
E STING RECLAIMED WATER SYSTEM
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS �
LAKE JESSUP WATER AUGMENTATION SYSTEM
The first step of the treatment process is pre - screening to remove suspended
solids in the lake water. It is proposed to install dual 200 micron Arniad automatic
back washing filters, each sized for 700 gallon per minute (gpm), or approximately
1 million gallons per day (MGD). Screening will be required in front of the final
filters to deliver water with lass than 20 milligrams per liter mg /l) of Total
Suspended Solids (T) to the final filters.
The second unit process will be dual Amiad microfiber filters to treat the surface
water to the required =`public access" treatment levels (less than 5 mg1I parts T )
required for augmentation of the reclaimed water. Pilot testing was performed
using a smaller version of the 20 micron screen and 7 micron microfiber filter to
verify that the two -stage system can achieve the required finished grater quality. A
turbidimeter will be installed after filtration to ensure the proper TSS removal is
achieved. High level disinfection will be provided prior to storage also to meet
public access treatment levels. A small wastewater pump station will be required
to transport the backwash wastewater generated by the treatment processes to
the wastewater treatment facility.
Storage of the treated clean water will be provided by a cast -in -place 240,000
gallon concrete tank. The tank will be constructed below the ground surface and
serve as an observation deck. The building style storage tank will also shield
some of the other treatment units. An electrical and chemical storage building w i l l
be constructed adjacent to the storage tank. Sodium hypochlorite storage and
feed pumps will be provided for disinfection of the treated lake water.
High service pumps will supply the augmentation water directly into the reclaimed
grater distribution system. The pumps will be vertical turbine can pumps, two at
1 ,500 gpm each (with provisions for two more) and a 500 gpm jockey pump. All
pumps will be equipped with variable speed drive units to meet the range of
reclaimed water demands. A chlorine residual analyzer will measure the residual
through the pumps and a downstream second chlorine injector will provide
additional chlorine feed if required. A flowmeter will be provided to measure the
reclaimed grater augmentation volumes.
Site improvements will include a stabilized access road and parking, stormwater
system, fencing, security features and signage, work pads, seeding and mulching,
and final site restoration.
There is an artesian well at the nearby Parkstone subdivision that has not been
able to be capped and is free flowing into Lake Jesup. The CUP permit allows the
City to intercept this approximately 0.3 MGD of clean water and pump it to the
Lake ,Jesup facility storage tank to augment the 2.0 M D of treated lake water.
Thus, this project will provide a total of 2.23 MGD of alternative source water to
offset and conserve potable groundwater for irrigation.
1.4.2 Oak Forest Storage and Pum in
The Oak Forest facility is designed as a storage and booster pumping station
3
system constructed on city property adjacent to the Oak Forest spray field site
rear the Oak Forest subdivision off Tuscawilla Road. The facility will have a three
(3) million gallon (MG) ground storage tank to be filled from an existing 12-inch
reclaimed water main along the perimeter of the site. A pressure sustaining valve
will be provided for filling the tank during low system demand periods without
significant pressure loss in the distribution system. Reclaimed distribution system
valves will be provided to allow the operation of the system with either the east or
west systems in case one system is down or to give the option to feed from one
system to the other.
The high service pumping system will consist of three variable speed vertical
turbine can booster pumps; 1 -500 gpm; 2 -1500 gpm; with room for two future
1500 gpm pumps. Flow metering will be included.
A small, air - conditioned masonry block building will be constructed to house
the electrical systems and controls. Portable generator tie -in capability will be
provided as no permanent generator will be installed. Site improvements will
include a stabilized access road and parking, stormwater system, fencing,
security features and signage, work pads, seeding and mulching, and final site
restoration.
1.5 Need For The Pro'ect
The City of Winter Springs owns and operates two water reclamation facilities, the
East WRF and the West WRF. The facilities currently supply reclaimed water
meeting public access criteria to a local golf course, residential irrigation and public
areas (such as parks and roadway medians) for irrigation. The city has expanded
its reclaimed water system over the years to maximize the operation of the system
due to seasonal variation in usage. Seasonally, the City has too much or too little
reclaimed water for its customers because of the large variation in usage between
the vet and dry seasons. The City is proposing to augment the reclaimed water
system to be able to supply irrigation quality grater to all of its residents as an
alternate to potable grater with the capability to serve all users, even daring the dry
season. This would benefit the City and the environment by reducing the potable
water demands and thereby reducing groundwater withdrawals. The City's current
CUP for its grater system includes reference to the Lake Jesup CUP permit and
allocates groundwater withdrawals based on use of the reclaimed grater system for
irrigation.
2.0 COST COMPARISON AND SELECTED ALTERNATIVE
.1 Previous P la n n inn Documents
,..
The City of Winter Springs Reclaimed Water Augmentation Study, dated
September 2005, was performed by CPH Engineers to address the possibilities of
augmenting the reclaimed grater system by expanding its distribution system for
residential irrigation to decrease groundwater withdrawals and to increase the
4
"beneficial uses of reclaimed water by eliminating the need to send it to percolation
ponds or spray fields. A copy of this study is contained in Appendix E. The Study
projected population and reclaimed water supply and use. It also evaluated
various treatment alternatives for using the grater from Lake Jesup. The Study
also contained cost estimates for the treatment facility and for distribution
expansion projects.
The City of Winter Springs Water Supply Plan, dated April 2007, reiterated the
need for the Reclaimed Water Augmentation project as an alternate water supply
to supplement potable groundwater withdrawals.
The City of Winter Springs Lake Jesup Augmentation Preliminary Engineering
Report, dated December 2008, detailed the proposed process descriptions and
evaluated four r different configurations of the proposed improvements. A copy of
that report is contained in Appendix C.
2.2 Alternatives and Estimated costa
The four different alternatives for providing treatment and storage were evaluated
in Section 4 of the Preliminary Engineering Report referenced above. Alternative 1
was a Conventional layout with treatment and storage all at the Lake Jesup site.
Alternative 2 is a more environment friendly version of that alternative. Alternative
3 would construct the treatment and storage facility at a remote site within the
reclaimed distribution network. Alternative 4 is to construct the treatment facility
portion adjacent to Lake Jesup with storage and booster pumping at the remote
site. The Engineering Report also discusses the use of an artesian well as an
additional augmentation source. The use of the well was also permitted by the
UP in Appendix A. construction costs for each alternative were also contained In
the 2008 Engineering Deport and summarized as follows:
1. Alternative 1 - $2,374,290,
2. Alternative 2 — $3
3. Alternative 3 - $3,823,808,
4. Alternative 4 - $2
Because all alternatives are composed of the same type and size of equipment,
just located differently, the operation, maintenance, repair and replacement costs
would be the same and thus not considered in the evaluation.
2.3 Selected Alternative
Although Alternative 1 is the least cost alternative, that is primarily because it is not
of the `ienvironment friendly' design as the other alternatives. There is no effort to
hide the mechanical equipment and structures from vier by others using the
remaining portion of the property. The southern, upland portion of the Lake Jesup
property is currently being used as a dog park where owners can let their dogs
play in large fenced -in areas. The selected alternative is Alternative 4 because it
is the least cost of the other alternatives and places the storage and pumping
y0
facility at a remote site, both more efficiently acting as a booster pumping facility
but also locating the large storage tank out of sight from park goers and
neighboring residences.
The basic components of the selective alternative have not materially changed
since the 2008 Engineering Report with the following exceptions:
* Lake Jesup Treatment Facility — The Actif to filter process was replaced
by the Amiad rnicrofilter filter that does net require the use of
coagulants and polymer.
Oak Forest Storage and Pumping — The prestressed storage tank was
upsized from 2 to 3 million gallon capacity.
Revisions to the designs of the projects have increased the costs and the overall
total estimated cost of the Selected Alternative is $4,543,000. The oak Forest
Storage and Pumping Contract "A" is currently under construction and SRF
funding is not being requested for that project. The total amount being requested
is ,001.631. A breakdown of these casts may be found in Appendix D.
3 .0 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
3.1 Environmental Benefits
The primary environmental benefit of this project is that it will allow expansion of
the City's reclaimed water distribution system for irrigation, thus offsetting the
withdrawal of 2.0 MGD of groundwater that will be available as potable water. The
use of the 0.23 IVIGID of groundwater from the artesian well will put it to beneficial
use, rather than it being Brasted to the lake. It will also offset an additional 0.23
MGID of groundwater that would be used for irrigation. Lake Jesup has also been
classified as an "impaired water" by the SJRWMD. The stormwater management
facility that will be constructed as part of the Lake Jesup portion of this project will
be designed to decrease pollutant loading to the lake.
3.2 Environmental I m pacts of the selected Alternative
3.2.1 Threatened Endanc3ered, Proposed and candidate Species and
Designated critical Habitats
The Lake Jesup site has been previously cleared of all trees except around
the perimeter and partially developed. A 1940 aerial shags the property as
agricultural, by 1957 it was open land, and a 1 980 aerial shows it as
residential. Exhibit E shows an aerial of the site as it exists now, along with
the proposed route for the connection to the existing distribution system.
Exhibit c shows the routing of the artesian well piping to the Augmentation
Facility. The area closer to Lake Jesup contained a single family residence
with a boat ramp, dock, gazebo, pale barns and shed. A copy of the site
plan is included in Appendix E. The oak Forest site is undeveloped and
X
mrwineem Ax hitects rveyars ® Date: 815/10
Planners Landscape Architects
Environmental Scientists Job No. 141
Canstrzwtion Management
Tra OJT nspartat a Scale: 1 400'
3117Eris# Rabitwon Street (C.0.4. No. 3315)
Orland, Vi~ 32801 (Lie. No. Al26 26)
'"honer 407,425.0 2 (L.8. DTs. 7143)
Fa= 402648.103 (Lie: Ns. LC X399)
LOCATION MAP
LAKE JEUP
AUGMENTATION FACILITY
fl z
EXHIBIT
B
_
A il , _ x
lb-
W a
_ U.
° z A L
co W
�r
s J
6 CY W
L
it WR.
� —
!
oi
- - , ai - ! TT V
z.°
lA1'
�' r• 1 i. �' - ... .� i :,da a �;� ,
:
_
AL
R AML
17
co I d d
Op
4r-'; < •ti
s
r — _
! k 'r•��I
-n -
Ile
- ■rl
iC C 2 '"I
- y ■
- . °• Vie'
if
Apt
d r• a si
a
7[RI�■F� � OFF : I: Wit.
{
,
wooded. The City of Winter springs has a tree protection ordinance
requiring a permit for tree removal and requiring replacement elsewhere on
site. The Oak Forest site plan is also contained in Appendix E.
An Environmental Assessment was performed by Stephanie Wolfe of the
City of winter Springs and is contained in Appendix E. Ms. Wolfe is an
Authorized Gopher Tortoise Agent with the Florida Fish and Wildlife
Commission, qualified to survey for and relocate gopher tortoises. She is
also a certified Arborist with the International Society of Arboriculture. GIs.
Wolfe has completed various trainings in wetland delineation including the
US Armor Corps of Engineers wetland training course and previously
worked as an environmental consultant completing various wetland
delineations and permitted wetland impacts on the local, state, and federal
level. Ms. Wolfe has investigated both sites and has relocated the one
gopher tortoise from the Oak Forest site. Other than that, there are no
known listed species or habitats on the property. The U.S. Fish & Wildlife
Service's Seminole County Federally Listed species information is
contained in Appendix E. A copy of this planning document has been sent
to the U.S. Fish &- Wildlife service for comments.
3.2.2 Surface Water B odies
The only surface grater body to be impacted by the project is Labe Jesup
itself. As stated above, the Labe Jesup Reclaimed Water Augmentation
Facility will improve the water quality of `impaired" Labe Jesup by removing
up to 2.0 M D of the relatively polluted grater. Its stormwater management
system also is designed to remove pollutants from runoff that would
normally run off to the lake.
3.2.3 Prime Agricultural Lands
The existing arses of the project sites and their surrounding areas were not
agricultural. There is no negative impact to prime agricultural lands.
3.2 .4 Wetlands
There are no wetlands impacted by this project.
3.2.5 Minority and Lour- income Communities
The project sites are not in or near any area generally described as a
minority and lour- income community. The construction of the project will
have no adverse impact on minority and low- income communities.
3.2.6 state Cleari n-q house Review
A copy of this document is being sent to the State Clearinghouse for
review.
7
4.0 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
At the August 24, 2009, regular meeting of the City Commission of the City of Winter
Springs, the Public Works /Utility Director presented to the Commission, and the public
attending, the proposed location for the Oak Forest storage tank for approval. Public
participation will be allowed at the City Commission accepting this document and its
documentation will be added by addendum.
5.0 FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY
5.1 Capital Fi nanc na Plan
The Capital Financing Plan is being prepared and will be submitted under separate
surer.
,5.2 Reclaimed Water Rates and Chars
The current reclaimed water rates and charges were adapted on September 28,
009 by Ordinance Igo. 2009-13 and have been codified into Article III, Section
19.138 of the City Code of Ordinances. A copy of Article III — Reclaimed Water
System is contained in Appendix F
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Project schedules have been prepared for each of the Labe ,Jesup Reclaimed Water
Augmentation L.JRWA) projects and are contained - r Appendix C. The Oak Forest
Storage and Pumping Contract `iA" is currently under construction. The Lake ,Jesup
Filtration and Pumping Contract "B" task completion dates are summarized as follows:
Complete Supplemental Planning
State Clearinghouse Review
Environmental 'Information Document Issued
Design
Permitting
Submit plans and specs to FDEP
Site Acquisition
Bid and Award
Construction
Project Closeout
April 2011
April 2011
April 2011
Completed
FDEP permits pending.
April 2011
Complete (Existing situ
May 2011
April 2012
May 201
The Artesian well supplement Contract "C" task completion dates are summarized as
follows
Complete Supplemental Planning
State Clearinghouse Review
April 2011
April 2011
8
Environmental Information Document Issued April 2011
Design
March 201
Permitting
March 201
Submit plans and specs to FDEP
March 201
Site Acquisition
September 2011
Bid and Award
June 2012
Construction
November 201
Project closeout
December 2013
7.0 PROJECT AUTHORIZATION
The project w i l l be authorized by resolution of the City Commission and a copy of
that resolution will be included herein in Appendix H.
8.0 IMPLEMENTATION
8.1 Pending Issues
The only issue pending that would impact this project is a required easement from
the Parkstone Homeowners Association to allover the City to construct the Artesian
Well portion of the project.
8.2 service or Internovernmental Agreements
There are no such agreements required.
8.3 Required Permits
All required permits for oak Forest storage and Pumping project have been
issued. The FDEP has issued a Notice of Intent to issue the permit modification to
the city's West WRF to include construction of the Lake Jesup Treatment Facility.
A copy is contained in Appendix I. FDEP has indicated that the Environmental
Resource Permit (ERP) application is complete and Issuance is pending. A copy
of the ERP permit will be inserted into Appendix i of this document when received.
APPENDIX A
0 -year Consumptive Use Permit
from the St Johns Jiver Mater Management District
y ° � � I �� �
d
' v e-
ti Water
- r - ► = Kirby H. Green ]fi ExecuM Dirrecicr • aevid W Fisk AssisMnt Readive Director
4049 Haid Street * RO. Box 1429 9 Palatka, FL 3217E -1 429 * 06) 329 -4500
On the Internet at ww sjrmd.com.
April 10, 2007
City of Winter Springs
1126 E SR 434
Winter Springs, FL 32703
S UBJECT: Consumptive Use Permit Number 105763
C ity of Winter Springs Reclaimed water Augmentation
Dear Sir /Madam:
Enclosed is your permit as authorized by the St. Johns River Water Management [district on
April 10, 2007.
Please be advised that the period of time within which a third party may request an
administrative hearing on this perT nit may not have expired by the date of issuance. A potential
petitioner has twenty- (26) days from the date on which the actual notice is deposited in the
mail, or twenty - one (21 ) days from publication of this notice when actual notice is not provided,
within which to fife a petition for an administrative hearing pursuant to Sections 1 20.569 and
120.57, Florida Statutes. receipt of such a petition by the District may result in this permit
becoming null and void.
Perm issuance does not relieve you from the responsibility of obtaining permits from any
federal, state and /or local agencies asserting concurrent jurisdiction over this work.
The enclosed permit is a legal document and should be kept with your other important records.
Please read the permit and conditions carefully since the referenced conditions may req
submittal of additional information. All information submitted as compliance with permit
conditions must be submitted to the nearest District Service center and should include the
above referenced permit number.
Sincerely,
t
Gloria Lewis, Director
Permit Data Services Division
Enclosures: Permit, Conditions for Issuan C ompliance Forms, flap, Well Tags
cc: District Permit File
A g ent: CPH Engineers, Inc.
1117 E. Robinson Street
O rlando, FL 32801
' - j ORL
2
G O V IE R N I H#
David G. Graham, CHAIRMAN John G. Sowinski, VI WI RMN Ann T. Moore, wcsmw Duane L Ottenslraer, TREASOMR
JACKSONVILLE ORLANDO lH1NKEL JACKSMIULE
R. Liar Albright Sin N. Hughes W1111arn W Karr Dmetdas D. Ling w. Leonard Wwd
AL.A PONTEVEDRA MELB01ORNE BEACH APORKA FERNANVINii BEM
PERMIT No* 105763 DATE ISSUED: April 10, 007
PROJECT NAIVE: City of Winter Spring Reclaimed Water entation
A PERMIT AUTHORIZING:
The District authorizes, as limited by the attached permit pond ifie ns, the use of 813.95 million
gallons per year (mgy) (2.23 million gallons per day (mgd) average) of combined surface water
from Lake Jesup and artesian well water for irrigation type use'
LOCATION:
Site: City of Winter Springs Reclaimed Water
Seminole County
Section(s): 26 Township(s): 20S Range(s): 3 0F=
ISSUED To:
City of winter Springs
1126 E SR 434
Winter Springs, FL 32708
Perrnittee agrees to hold and save the St. Johns fiver Water Management District and its
successors harmless from any and all damages, claims, or liabilities which may arise from
permit issuance. Said application, including all maps and specffications attached thereto, is by
reference made a part hereof.
This permit does not convey to permittee any property rights nor any rights of privileges other
then those specified herein, nor relieve the perm ittes from complying with any law, regulation or
requirement affecting the .rights of other bodies or agencies. All structures and works installed
by permittee hereunder shall remain the property of the permittee,.
This permit may be revolved, modified or transferred at any time pursuant to the appropriate
provisions of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes and 4o -1, Florida Administrative Code.
PERMIT IS CONDITIONED UPON:
See conditions on attached "Exhibit A", dated April 10, 2007
By .
.
St. Johns river Mater Management District
Department of Resource Management
Sy:
Kirby B. Green, III
Executive Director
"EXHIBIT A"
CONDITIONS FOR ISSUANCE of PERMIT NUMBER 106763
CITY of WINTER SPRINGS
DATED APRIL 10, 2007
District Authorized staff, upon proper identification, wi -11 have permission tb enter, inspect
and observe permitted and related faciiities l n order to determine Compliance with the
approved plans, specifications and conditions of this permit.
2. Nothing i n this permit should be construed to limit the authority of the St. ,Johns Fiver Water
Management District to declare a water shortage and issue orders pursuant to Section
373.175, Florida Statutes, or to formulate a plan for implementation during periods of water
shortage, pursuant to Section 373.246, Florida Statutes. Its the event a water shortage, is
declared by the 'District Governing Board, the permittee mast adhere to the water shortage
restriction as specified by the District, even though the specified water shortage restrictions
may be inconsistent with the terms and conditions of this permit.
3. Prior to the construction, modification, or abandonment of a well, the permittee roust obtain
a Water Well Construction Permit from the St. ,Johns Fiver Water Management District, or
the appropriate local Bove mment pursuant to Chapter 40C-3, Florida Administrative Code.
Construction, modification, or abandonment of a well will require m od ificafion of the
consumptive use permit when such construction, modification or abandonment is other than
that specified and described on the consumptive use permit application form.
4, Leaking or i n o perative well casings, valves, or controls must be repaired or replaced as
required to eliminate the leaf or make the system fully operational,
5, Legal uses of water existing at the time of time permit application may not be interfered with
by the consumptive use. If una ntici gated interference occurs, the District may revoke the
permit in whole or in part to curtail or abate the interference unless the permittee mitigates
for the interference. In those cases where other permit holders are identified by the District
as also contributing to the interference, the permittee may choose to mitigate in a
cooperative effort with these other perrrr ittees. The permittee must submit a mitigation plan
to the District for approval prior to implementing such mitigation.
6. Off -site lard uses existing at the time of permit application may not be significantly adversely
impacted as a result of the consumptive use. If unanticipated significant adverse impacts
occur, the oistdct shall revoke the permit In whole or in part to curtail or abate the adverse
impacts, unless the impacts can be mitigated by the permittee.
7 The District must be notified, in writing, wlthin 30 days of any sale, conveyance, or other
transfer of a well or facility from which the permitted cons umpfive use is made or within 30
days of any transfer of ownership or control of the real property at which the permitted
consumptive use is located. All transfers of ownership or transfers of permits are subject to
the provisions of section 40c -1.61 2, Florida Administrative Code.
8. A District-issued identification tag shall be prominently displayed at each withdrawal site by
permanently affixing such tag to the pump, headgate valve or other withdrawal facility as
provided by Section 400-2.401, Florida Administrative Code. Perm ittee shall notify the
lei striet in the event that a replacement tag is needed.
9. Landscape irrigation is prohibited between the hours of 10 :00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., except as
follows:
(a) Irrigation using a micro - irrigation system is a slow d anytime.
(b) The use of reclaimed water for irrigation is allowed anytime, provided appropriate signs
are placed on the property to inform the general public and D istdct enforcement personnel
of such use. such signs must be in accordance with local restrictions.,
(c) Irrigation of, o r i n preparation for planting, new landscape is allowed any time of day for
one 80 day period provided irrigation is limited to the amount necessary for plant
establishment,
(d) watering in of chemicals, including insecticides, pesticides, fertilizers, fungicides, and
herbicides when required by law, the manufacturer, or bast management practices is
allowed anytime within 24 Fours of application.
(e) Irrigation systems may be operated anytime for mainte na n ce r and repair purposes not to
exceed ten minutes per hour per zone.
10. All submittals made to demonstrate compliance with this permit must have the CUP number
108783 clearly labeled on the submittal,
11. This permit will expire on April 10, 2027.
12. The combined maximum annual withdrawals of surface water from Lake Jesup plus
groundwater from the exisfing free - flowing artesian well, as described in the application to
supplement the City of Winter Springs reclaimed water system must not exceed;
87.60 millionn gallons (0.24 million gallons per day average) in 2008,
87.60 million gallons (0.24 million gallons per day average) in 200
113.15 million gallons (0.31 million gallons per day average) in 2010,
102.20 million gallons (0.28 million gallons per day average) "i n 2011,
278.78 million gallons (0.75 million gallons per day average) in 2012,
262.80 million gallons (0.72 million gallons per day average) in 2013,
430.70 rnlil ion gallons (1. 18 m i ll ion gallons per day average) in 2014,
419.75 million gallons (11.1 b million gallons per day average) in 2015,
587.65 million gallons (1,81 million gallons per day average) in 2018,
:578.05 million gal Ions (1.57 million gallons per day average) in 2017,
726.35 million gallons (1.99 million gallons per day average) in 2018,
715.40 million gallons (1.96 million gallons per day average) in 2019, and
813.95 million gallons (2.23 million gallons per day average) in 2020 through 2027.
13. The permittee may use flow from the free- flowirng artesian well (District GRS ID 104913), as
described in the permit application, to supplement the reclaimed water system whenever the
demand for reclaimed water exceeds the quanfity of treated wastewater available from the
City's waste water treatment facilities. The free -f Howl ng artesian well may not be pumped or
otherwise used to produce more than its free flowing rate at anytime. The well must be
allowed to flog into Labe Jesup when flow from the well is not being used to supplement the
reclaimed system.
14. The pennittee must ensure that all supply line and distribution connections that augment
and distribute the reclaimed service are metered, including the artisan well flaw both into tine
system and into Lake Jesup aria the bypass.
15. The perm ittee must maintain all flow metes s * in case of failure or breakdown of any meter,
the District must be notified in writing within 5 days of its discovery. A defecttve meter must
be repaired or replaced within 30 days of its discovery'
18. The pe rrnittee must have the flowmeters checked for accuracy every 3 years within 30 days
of the anniversary date of permit issuance, and recalibrated ff the d1iFference between the
actual flog and the meter reading is greater than 5 %. District Form No. EN -51 must be
submitted to the District within 10 days of the inspectio n /ca libration.
17. Total withdrawals from all pumps, which may include all or some of the following supply
pumps, Pump 1 (District GRS ID 104702), Pump 2 (District GRS ID 1 04703), Pump 3
(District GRS ID 104704), Pump 7 (District GRS ID 1D4885) and Pump 8 (District GRS ID
104886), , free- fowing artesian well (District GRS 1D 10491 3) must be recorded
continuously, totaled monthly, and reported to the District at feast every six months from this
initiation of the monitoring using Form EN-50. The reporting dates each year Will be as follows
for the duration of the permit:
Deporting Period Deport Due Gate
January — June ,duly 31
J u ly -- December January 31
18. The perm ittee's consumptive use shall not adversely impact wetlands, lakes, and spring
flows or cause or contribute to a violation of minimum flows and levels adopted in Chapter
40C-8, FA. ., except as authorized by an SJRWMD- approved minimum flow or level (MFL)
recovery strategy. if unanticipated significant adverse impacts occur, the SJRWMD shall
revoke the permit 'in whole or in part to curtail or abate the adverse impacts, unless the
impacts can be mitigated by the permittee.
19. All available lower quality sources of water including reclaimed water and storm water must
be distributed for use, or used by the applicant in place of higher q ual lty water sources when
deemed feasible pursuant to District rules and applicable state law
20, The permittee must conduct a detailed crater audit of the reclaimed water system in 2010,
2013, 2016 2019 2022 and 2025 and submit it to the District by February 15" of the
following year. All water uses given in the audit must be for the previous calendar year and
documentation provided on how the amounts were metered or determined. If the water
a ud it shows that the system losses and unacco u rated for gate r utility uses exceed 10 %, a
lean detection and repair program rust be implemented within one year.
1. The permittee must adapt an ordinance that prohibits the use of potable water for irrigation
purposes if reclaimed water is available. The permittee shall submit a draft of the ordinance
to the District for review and approval by October 31, 2007. The permittee shall adopt an
ordinance, as approved by the District no later than April 10 2008.
The permittee must submit, to the District, a compliance report pursuant to subsection
373.236(3) F.S., every five gears during the term of the permit. The permittee shall submit
the report by July 1' of the required years. The report shall contain surfficient information to
demonstrate that the permittee's use of surface water will continue for the duration of the
permit to meet the conditions of permit issuance set forth in the Distract rules that existed at
the time the permit was issued for 20 years by the District. At a minimum the compliance
report must Include:
(a) A description of the current reclaimed water supply and delivery system and annual flow
amounts for the previous 6 years;
(b) Provide documentation that the artesian well was used only when the demand for
reclaimmed water exceeded the quantity of treated wastewater available from the City's waste
water treatment facilities, that the well was not allowed to flour more than the well's free
flowing rate, and that the well was allowed to flow into Lake Jesup when flow from the well
was not used to augment the reclaimed system;
(c) Documentation describing all actlAties taken during the previous five years to further
develop alternative water supplies by the permittee, including but not limited to planning*
design, financing and project schedules;
(d) Documentation verifying that the sources are capable of supplying the needs authorized
by this permit without causing significant harm to water and water related resources;
(e) Documentation verifying that the use of augmentation grater is efficient and that the
permittee is implementing all feasible water conservation measures;
( n updated analysis demonstrating that the augmentation allocations as sat forth in the
permit do not cause unacceptable impacts to springs, wetlands and tales;
(g) Information documenting that the augmentation allocations as sat forth in the permit are
needed for the remainder of the permit.
FI1����Ia] � !.'
C ity of Winter Springs
Reclaimed Water Augmentation Study, September 2005
Cit y of Winter Springs — Reclaimed water Augmentation Study Paw No. ES-11
Executive S
Finding alternate sources of water has become a priority for the region because of
increased demand for potable water created by continued growth of the area. We are also
seeing growth occur from redevelopment at higher densities in the Winter Springs area. In
the past Linter Springs was known as a bedroom community. Now it is a vibrant City of its
own with a developing Town Center and higher density multistory structures being
constructed in and around the Town Center. The City of Winter Springs has many
attributes which makes the community a pleasant place to live. To maintain continuous
growth, we need to develop alternate sources of water supply. we believe that a natural
resource exists in Lake Jesup and that this source can be used for irrigation and free up
the groundwater source for potable uses only. Such a plan requires the expansion of the
secondary water delivery system and also requires a water source. Irrigation water does
not have to be potable and therefore the level of treatment can be reduced. The City
already has an extensive reclaimed distribution system and this system can be expanded
to meet the future needs of the City of Winter Springs.
The project is divided into two phases for the treatment works and suer, phases for the
distribution system. The project spans the next fifteen years with equally sized distribution
projects every two years.
Tabs. t -. a ntatiron [
Year Ending
Irrigation
Lake Jesup Treatment
September 30
Phase
Phase
2007
A
2008
1
009
2010
2011
201
3
2013
B
2014
4
2015
2016
5
2017
2018
6
2019
2020
7
Tot P roject
Probable Opinion of
Construction cost
$2,646,420
$2,047,500
$1,610,400
$
$2,o57,5o0
$1,892
$1
$ 17l5999320
This report reveals that the project is feasible. There are many more steps required to
make the project a reality. The following items need to be pursued:
'I Discussion with SJRWMD on the project and coordination with "Thee Friends
of Lake .Jesup ". Preliminary discussions have been made with SJRWMD.
fit of Winter nn s -- Reclaimed Water Augmentation Study Page No. ES-2
2) Proceed with an application of a Consumptive Use Permit (CUP). This
process has been started.
3) Upon approval of the CUP, proceed with pilot testing of the recommended
treatment options.
4) Proceed with a design with known data from pilot testing.
5) Proceed with design(s) to expand the reclaimed distribution system.
City of Winter SrAngs — Reclaimed plater Auamentation study Pace No. 1 -1
SECTION I
INTRODUCTION
1.0 Introduction
The City of Winter springs owns and operates two water reclamation facilities, the
East 1 RF and the West WRF. The facilities currently supply reclaimed grater
meeting public access criteria to two local golf courses, residential irrigation and
public areas (such as parks and roadway medians) for irrigation. The city has
expanded its reclaimed water system over the years to maximize the operation of
the system due to seasonal variation in usage. Seasonally, the City has too much or
too little reclaimed water for its customers because of the lame variation in usage
between the wet and dry seasons.
The City is proposing to supplement, or augment, the reclaimed water system to be
able to supply irrigation quality grater to all of its residents as an alternate to potable
grater with the capability to serge all users, even during the dry season. Therefore,
during the reduced demands of the wet season, all of the reclaimed water from the
wastewater plants will be beneficially used for irrigation instead of having to u the
percolation ponds or dedicated spray sites. This would further benefit the city and
the environment by reducing the potable grater demands by reducing groundwater
withdrawals.
Cily of Winter Si3rings — Declaimed Water Augmentation Studv Pam No. -1
SECTION
EXISTING CONDITIONS
2.0 Existing conditions
2.1 Wastewater Treatment
The City currently owns and operates two water reclamation facilities, (WRF). Each
facility can treat its effluent to public access reclaimed water standards as defined
by Florida Department of Environmental Protection. The WRF's have a combined
treatment capacity of approximately 4.08 SID.
MEMMM T
The East WRF has a distribution pump station that is fed by a three million ga I Ion
reclaimed water ground storage tank. The pumping system consists of four (
pumps; one jockey pump at Soo - gpm, two (2) pumps at 1,200 -gpm each, and one
pump at 1,800-gpm. The total pumping capacity is ,400-gpm (3.456 MGD) with the
largest pump and the jockey pump out of service. The treatment plant has a
permitted capacity of 2.012 MGD and the reclaimed water distribution pump station
exceeds the 150% pu m ping criteria of FDEP regulations.
2.1.2. West WRF
The West WRF has a distribution pump station that is fed by a two million gallon
reclaimed water ground storage tank. The pumping system consists of five (5)
pumps; one jockey pump at 180 gpm, two (2) pumps at 950-gpm each, and two )
pumps at boo gpm. The total pumping capacity is 2650 gpm (3.816 MGD) with one
of the boo gpm pumps and the jockey pump out of service. The treatment plant has
a permitted capacity of 2.07 M D and the reclaimed water distribution pump station
exceeds the 150% pumping criteria of FDEP regulations.
2.2 Distribution System
The existing distribution system is basically split into two areas: the East System
and the West System. The two systems are each served by their respective
reclaimed water facilities and are interconnected at the northwest end of oak
Forest. While the system is interconnected and water freely flows between the
systerns, in order to sim plify the description of the two systems, they will be referred
to as the East and Kest systems. Please note that the permitted capacity of the
disposal sites exceeds the permitted treatment capacity of each of the Water
Reclamation Facilities.
The East System currently delivers reclaimed water from the East WRF to the areas
described in Table -1 and shown on Figure -1.
z
-4
ti m
M rn
Z —1
Z m m
m
❑ ::5;0
r (n z
z
m
0 en m
fn X: z
0 m m z
w
m ' V)
z n
0 0
0 < '0
0 30
r- C
—4 m CO
C0 m
m IG)
m m
G)
�3 07� z
rn m " 1� 11
m 10 . 1 1 P r
mi
m :1
V
-60 VeN:,J,
3cp 0
r
(A - C rp
- 0
z
% (Lip
et jlkw-
e
n �,� TA T 0
m
0
C C 0 z
rn
m
z
—4
m (D rn
j X
A 0
rn M
0 m 0
m
m 1p r 0
0 z 0
Qk.
C6
n7
z
z ------ -N%L
U)
m
d-C m
C3 m
<
;u
>
1 �� J � � . � + • �• fore. fir drl
0 1., I dir
0 z V 'D
>
N :E z
C 2) x z —
Z U3
z m C) r-
CD
JIJ
-x m
0 rn 2 0
z CI
J A Jr
> >
m C
m
Z z m
[� 0
m z:u
0
c)
a
we L
Z
4r-
ti A
z
z
0
jr v
41 0
m
m
—4 All"
C
3:
0 C
* z
rn rn
';u
rn
0
m
m
do
M m
m co
m
m
L71 m
X
n
9 M
0 0
0
0
z
0
!Z—
Scale: NONS
WRF DISPOSAL SITES -n
Date; 11-17-2005
ob No. I W041 11 C
ZVIUT47' Cph upiffilivers. ca lit CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
11 ITC-ig ilarir.clm Orkwk 2 & -UMJ -flan
RECLAIMED WATER AUGMENTATION STUDY
City of Winter Springs - Reclaimed Water Augmentation Study Page No. 2 -3
. *`.=
SITE
E a t e rn R a c I a i me d Wat r 3
Permitted capacity Average Demand MGM
(MGD)
Tusca ills Golf Course
*Not specified
0.157
Oak Forest Spray site
0.
0.20
Percolation Ponds
0.610
0.246
- Trot wood Park
*Not specified
0.000
Residential Irrigation
*Not specified
0.587
*All public access areas permitted for 1.720.
The Tusca ilia Golf Course is connected by a 16 -inch pipe directly from the WRF.
This pipe reduces to a 1 0-inch and runs west through the golf course to Winter
Springs Blvd. At this point, the pipe foods Tusca oaks and Arrowhead, as well as
the Linter Springs Blvd. median irrigation system. The 10-inch trunk line crosses
Winter Springs Blvd and enters the Power Easement. The pipeline follows the
Power Easement to the oak. Forest spray site and the point of interconnection with
the vest System.
The East WRF also sends flog through an -inch main that runs along Winter
Springs Blvd east to Northern Way. This pipe runs a short way up Northern Way to
where it crosses over to Seneca Blvd. At this location the ,Hain feeds the percolation
ponds and the residential irrigation along Seneca. The -inch main travels along
Seneca to Vistawilla give where it feeds the Howell Creek Reserve, Creeks Run
and Eagle's Watch subdivisions.
The best System currently delivers reclaimed water from the West WRF to the
areas described in Table 2-2 and shorn on Figure -1.
Table 2-2- Western Reclaimed VV a t e .rS j .vz 0em
SITE
Permitted capacity
(MGD)
Average Demand (MGD)
Winter Springs Golf Club
0.350
0.0 86
Central Winds Park
0.136
0.044
bite 16 Spray Site
0.200
0.043
Da ron Ponds
0.530
o.
It Greenwood Ponds
0.110
0.014
Power Easement
Not Re- permitted
0.000
Site 17 Ponds
0.100
0.001
Residential Irrigation
0.795
0.591
City of Winter Sari ngs — Reclaimed Water Augmentation Study Pa -ge No. 2 -4
The reuse distribution system is shown in Figure 2-2. There are three main
branches of the distribution system starting at the WRF. An -inch line runs south
along the power easement. It follows the power easement (a portion of which is
irrigated) east to where it crosses Bahama Road. It then follows Bahama east to
Shore Road. The line then splits into 12-inch and 6 -inch pipes. The pipes converge
at Site 16, them a pipe runs south to interconnect with the East reuse system and a
12-inch pipe runs north to the northeast corner of the Winding Hollow development.
At this point the 12-inch runs east to connect winding Hollow and stone Gable, and
west to connect Central finds Park.
The second main is an 8 -inch pipe which runs east out of the plant across the
Winter Springs Golf Course to Sheoah Blvd. At Bheoah, the -inch runs northeast
across the golf course to the Da ron site and a 12-inch line runs dorm Bheoah to Td
Street. The 12-inch line runs east along 3rd to Moss Road, south on Moss to
Bahama Road, and east on Bahama to interconnect with the previously described
first main.
The third main is a 12-inch pipe which runs north along the power easement
connecting Greenspoint and ending at Wildwood for a future connection.
2.3 Existing Reclaimed Demand,
The combined system currently has a demand of approximately 2.34 M D.
Table 2-3 lists the current permitted reclaimed water sites with their permitted
capacities and their average usage (December 2003 thru November 004).
Table 2-. Reclai ter 5.1tes (Combined)
Tu scawil la Golf course
Permitted
Average
SITE
Capacity
Demand
Residential)
(MGD)
(MGD)
Tu scawil la Golf course
Not Specified
0.157
East side Public Access (Including
1.720
0.587
Residential)
Winter Springs Golf Course
0.350
0,086
Residential Irrigation (West side)
0.795
0.591
Percolation Ponds
1.350
0.553
Spray sites (Oak Forest & Site '1 6)
0.401
0.243
Public Area Irrigation W P
0.136
0.044
Total
4.75
2.26
As shown in Table - the permitted residential irrigation accounts for
approximately 2.51 IIIII D or % of the total permitted capacity and for
a)
m
z
0
:3
01
0.
i
At
IL or-
ji
ij
vo�
. ...........
rwwmr Scakr. NONE
pfi� mommomm" EXISTING RECLAIMED WATER SYSTEM
ir Am*ftucft Dabr. 11-17-2WS
wft ul Jdamm Jffi No.: Vml 11 c
0
W-M".,p 'Hxfmd*rf.v@w I - CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS g ;a
l"yEm* SbE4 arwoa it mm Qr*%mftmfA&t%or-mtJ= RECLAIMED W ATER AUGMENTTIO AN STUD Y M
PhowMAMM &L-WIMUM I P& am I I I
Cit y of Winter Springs — Reclaimed Water Augmentation Study Page No. M
approximately 1.'18 MG D or 52 % of the average demand. Table 2-3 also shows
that the city has additional disposal capacity to allow for fluctuations in demand as
well as supply of secondary water at this time. This allows the city to fully utilize the
available reclaimed water for beneficial residential rouse. Very little of the of the
effluent goes to non- beneficial reuse and this currently helps to conserve water and
reduces demand on the city water system. As of September 2005, there are
approximately 1,581 residential reclaimed customers. This equates to approximately
770 gallons per day per lot (customer). More detailed data provided by the city
indicates a wide range of customer usage. Therefore, 600 gpd /customer was
utilized for planning purposes. The percolation ponds and spray sites can be
considered alternate or backup sites. On the surface, it appears that there is
approximately 0.70 MGD available for residential irrigation by offsetting the Ponds
and spray sites. However, the system often doesn't have enough water for it's
customers during the dry season and overloads the ponds and spray sites during
the wet season. We assumed that current reclaimed irrigation demand consists of
the residential connections, parks and the golf courses. The demand is
approximately 1.62 I I I . For planning purposes, we will consider the existing
reclaimed demand to be 1.8 MGM.
The augmentation program will help this situation by providing more reclaimed sites,
e.g., residential and commercial irrigation for the entire gear. luring the Bret season
(low reclaimed flog demand period), these sites will be provided with effluent rather
than being seat to the percolation ponds and dedicated spray sites. This will take
the burden off of the percolation ponds and non- public access dedicated spray sites
and allow therm to be used during more extreme conditions such as abnormally high
rainfall years. During the dry season, the augmentation facility will add the water
necessary to maintain these additional residential irrigation customers and will in
turn reduce the demand on potable grater sources (groundwater).
Cit y of Winter Sp ring s — Reclaimed Water Augmentation Study Pacie No. 3 -�`
CHAPTER
AVAILABLE RECLAIMED POPULATION, WATER FLOWS AND SERVICE AREA
3.1 Population and Future Land Use
Population data and projections were obtained from the Seminole County website and is
the Socioeconomic Planning Data from Planning and Development, and are the adopted
numbers for the County's Comprehensive Plan. This data is consistent with the regional
water quality and supply goals (a.k.a. Seminole county region) and the Water Facilities
Work Plan of the City of winter Springs. For additional information on population data, see
the Water Facilities Work Plan. These two plans have been fully coordinated.
The total growth projected for the service area is 7,210 people for the 15-year period
through 2020 based on Table 3-2, Winter Springs Data. This equals a growth of
approximately 20 percent for the planning period.
If a significant change in population projections occurs due to changes in development, the
proposed reclaimed water supply must be reevaluated. Since the reclaimed system is
interconnected between the two facilities, we have shown the combined available reuse
without regard to where it might be used in the system.
TAKE -1
EXISTING SERVICE AREA POPULATION PROJECTIONS
Traffic
Zone
Population by Traffic Zone
2000
2002
2008
2020
71
610
990
1 590
161
72
2231
2207
2170
2129
74(50%)
254
256
248
247
82
3093
3106
3117
3151
83
4454
4630
5 177
5037
34
2205
2279
2391
2345
35
43
93
353
353
86
73
36
702
107
87
3746
4437
5473
5370
83
3217
2449
2796
2743
89
306
359
939
921
90
3491
3626
3861
3300
91
3362
3341
3337
3320
92
2463
2444
2424
2378
93
20
24
31
35
94
2050
2056
2065
2026
95
2096
2096
2669
2613
Tota
33
35
39,843
39 715
Source: Created for this report based on Seminole County data.
Note: Traffic Zone 85 adjusted for actual and projected development in the zone
C ity of Winter S rin s — Reclaimed Water Augmentation Study Page No. 3 -2
3. 2 Reclailmed water supply
The reclaimed water supply is summarized in Table 3-2. From review of the historical data
presented in Table 3-2, an average daily supply of effluent ofapproximately 63 gallons per
capita per day (GPCD) will be available as the basis for the total supply projections.
The projected average day supply of reclaimed water for the City of Minter Springs through
the year 2020 is provided in Table 3-2. It can be seen from the table that average daily
supply for the existing service area will reach 2.77 m iIIion gallons per day by the year 2020,
corresponding to are increase of approximately 20 percent. This is an annual growth rate of
only one (1) percent over the 15 -year period from 2005 to 2020. It represents an additional
0.5 MGD for use by residential connections and is equivalent to about 833 connections
(lots) at 600 gpd /lot average or 2225 people at 2.67 persons per household. Approximately
0.6 M D of reclaimed water is available from current supplies that are not beneficially
used. This yields a total of 1.1 MGD or 1833 connections or an additional 4895 people.
TiABLE 302.
FM HIS ` 11c cTED POPULATION AND WASTEWATER Flow
W&
Population
Population
East
west
W. S. Data
Sern Co
WRl=
WRF
3
Data
MGM
MD
Total
Per
per
Capita
Capita
Actual
Avera g
57
3
1.102
6
35,505
64
1.072
4
63
2000
34,570
33,269
1.020
0.940
2001
34
1.093
1.102
2002
35,505
35,029
1.072
1.142
2003
35,931
1.171
1.115
2004
36
1.160
1.156
2005
36
ooh
37,240
007
37
2003
33,139
39,343
009
33,597
2010
39
2011
39,529
201
40
2013
40,483
2014
40,969
2015
41461
2016
41,953
2017
42,462
2013
42,971
2019
43,487
2020
445008
39
1.96
2.20
2.214
2.236
2.316
2.32
2.35
2.37
2.40
2.43
2.46
2.49
2.52
2.55
2.53
2.61
2.64
2.68
2.71
2.74
2.77
Notes:
Winter Springs Eased on 1.2% Projected Annual Growth
Projections of flow based on 63 gpcd.
City of Winter ft rings s — Reclaimed Water Augmentation Study Page No. 3 -3
For projection purposes, the winter Springs data was used as this would be the more
conservative approach. Use of higher population data will cause the improvements to be in
place prior to the need.
The St. Johns River Water Management District JRWMD) is increasingly requiring public
water suppliers to implement methods of wastewater reuse to reduce groundwater
withdrawals from the aquifer and the existing system along with expansion will benefit the
City when re- applying for a new Consumptive Use Permit.
3.4 Service Area Growth
The City of winter Springs is a highly developed residential community and is surrounded
by other highly developed areas. To the Vest of U.S. 17-92 is the Longwood service area;
to the South are the Casselberry and Seminole County service areas; to the Southeast
and East is the Oviedo service area and to the North is Lake Jesup. All these systems
offer constraints to the potential growth of the size of the City. The City does not anticipate,
at this time, any significant expansion of the utility service area. The area available for
future service is already within the existing City limits. Development will occur as fill -in on
tracts that have not been previously developed or on tracts that are redeveloped at higher
density. The most recent development trend has been to construct townhomes and
condominiums on these available tracts, especially in the area within the Tern center,
which places little demand on the reclaimed water system.
Cily of Winter S Hn s — Reclaimed water Augmentation Study Pacie fro. 4 -1
SECTION 4
ANALYSIS
4.0 Analysis
The expansion of the reclaimed water system with the supplementation or
augmentation of surface water from Lake Jesup was analyzed based on the
treatability of the Lake Jesup water and the feasibility of the implementation and
construction of the distribution system. Based on the City map and other available
data and planning sessions with the city staff, there are potentially 11,318
residential units /customers in the service area, of which 1,581 are connected,
leaving 9737 potential connections. This number includes all tov nhomes and
condominiums available for service. Current development trends in the City are for
higher density townhomelcondominium units which have a much lower demand for
reclaimed water. We do not believe that all water customers will utilize secondary
water for irrigation. Not every lot owner will invest in an in- ground irrigation system
and pay the ,monthly fees associated with irrigation. Also, some customers are in
townhomes, apartments and condominiums which will not use reclaimed water to
the same extent as single family homes. Therefore, for planning purposes we
identified 6,672 future connections (total available units are 8253 minus 1581
existing connections) based on the number of single family detached units within the
service area. Using the 0% factor described herein, the planning number for new
connections is 5338 future connections. The current reclaimed water usage of the
existing customer base averages less than boo gpd /customer on an annual basis.
The usage ranges between 250 and loo gpd per customer. This was based on a
random sampling of existing customer accounts. For planning purposes, we used
the higher average to assure that the system has the ability to serge the potential
demand. Historically, we have seen a 5 -50% participation in retrofit reclaimed
water irrigation programs. We have projected an overall average herein of 80%
because the tread is for more people to use reclaimed water as a secondary source
as acceptance of this grade of water grows.
The golf courses, residential irrigation and the public area irrigation, such as the
pans, are also beneficial irrigation sites. The percolation ponds and the spray sites
are secondary, or backup, disposal sites. The total beneficial irrigation demands
yields a projected total demand of approximately 5.0 MGD AADF, including existing
reclaimed demand. This figure is based on 600 gpd per customer annual average
daily flow; Soo gpd per customer for the wet season flog; and goo gpd per customer
for the dry season flow. It consists of 3.20 IVI ID AADF future flow (0.8*6672
customers*600 gpd /customer) and 1.8 IVI ID existing demands. Currently, the two
WRF's can only supply 2.32 IVI ID based on their average daily flow. The projected
supply by 2020 is 2.77 MGID based on projected population growth. The remaining
2.23 M ID AADF, say 2.25 MGD AADF for planning purposes, could be withdrawn
from Lake Jesup to supplement the demand. This number should be increased to
4.73 MGD (5.o MGD AADF * 1.5 dry season peaking factor minus 2.77 AMID
effluent available) to account fora higher demand during the dry season. The dry
Cit y of winter SDHnas — Reclaimed Water Augmentation Study Page No. 4-
season will be the time of year where the demand will be the highest and the time of
year where supplementation will also be required.
This data was cross - checked with the water plant usage. The three water treatment
plants combined average approximately 3.784 III D. Irrigation grater can be as
much as 0-40% of the potable water usage in a system. By assuming that the
water plant irrigation production is 0 %, the supplementation from Labe Jesup
would need to be approximately 1.1 35 MGD. However, customers typically use
reclaimed water at higher volumes than potable water due to the lower cost.
Therefore, the range of supplementation would be a love of 1 - 135 during the wet
season to a high of 4.73 I I D during the dry season (assuming 0% participation
and a dry season demand of goo gpd /customer). we believe the facility should be
designed for a 2.25 M D AADF rate in two phases.
In discussions with City staff, it was determined that many older established areas
within the western part of the City do not have automatic irrigation systems. This
accounts for some of the difference between the projected reclaimed flows versus
the actual water plant flows. we expect that the demand for reclaimed water will
change the current situation as it will provide a cheaper source of water for irrigation
purposes. The different areas were analyzed and discussed with the City to
determine the most effective and beneficial sites to add to the system over time.
This prioritization is based on expansion of the system from the existing
infrastructure outward equally distributed between the two wastewater effluent
sources and one augmentation source. It is not based on projected demand or
potential for disposal. This maximizes the use of the existing infrastructure. The
expansion of the reclaimed water distribution system has been prioritized and is
further detailed in Section 5.0.
4.1 Available Artesian Well
An artesian well exists within the Parkstone subdivision directly west of the
proposed augmentation treatment site. It is located at the east end of Sandringham
Court. Attempts have been made by the St. Johns Fiver water Management District
to plug /cap this well, but these efforts have unfortunately failed. However, we
believe we can turn this into an advantage for the augmentation system. The water
quality of this well is very good. It does not contain solids and the turbidity is low. It
can easily be used for irrigational purposes or to supplement the reclaimed water
system. We propose a routing of this flow to a new submersible pump station.
When demand is high for reclaimed water, this well water can be pumped to the
supplementation site and stored in the storage facility for distribution into the
reclaimed water system. It is estimated that this well flows at a rate of one (1) m it I ion
gallons per day. If the flow is not required, it will flow through the off -line
submersible pump station and into Lake Jesup as it presently does. The transfer
line will be approximately sic (6) inches in diameter and will be routed along rights -
of -way and easements to the augmentation facility. The line is approximately 3420
lineal feet. At a cost of bo.00lLF, the estimated construction cost is $171 1000.
Cit y of Winter Springs - Reclaimed Dater Augmentation Stuff Pa a No. 4 -3
4.2 Distribution system Analysis
The demand was incorporated as part of a distribution pipe model known as
Water AD, a computer hydraulic modeling software. The City's current reclaimed
water piping model was expanded to encompass the entire City. The demand was
based on 100% participation over an 8 -hour irrigation period. The model was run
several times to estimate the necessary pipe sizing, using a maximum pipe velocity
of 5 feet per second (fps) as a guideline, and to estimate the required withdrawal
from Lake Jesup. The distribution system demand is based on a peak condition to
allow the system to operate properly during the dry season. The modeled demands
will necessarily be higher than the annual average demands discussed in other
Sections of this report.
The model was run using a "worst-case" scenario, which assumes all future
residential connections use goo gpd (dry season demand). This scenario, while also
assuming a 100% connection rate, produces a reclaimed water demand of
approximately 8 MGD- The pear demand would occur during the driest months of
the year, when the demands are higher. The system must be capable of supplying
water during these seasonal variations. Therefore, the (model was run using the
pear usage rate of 900 gpd /lot. The model was evaluated using a pear condition of
12 MGM, which assumes 50% of the connections are running over an 8 -hour
irrigation period. This is equivalent to a peaking factor of 1.5 times the dry season
demand. The dry season demand is 1. 5 times to AADF, so the combined peaking
factor is 2.25. A 50% connection rule was used because of the current SJRWMD
water conservation regulations. By spreading the demand equally and designing to
conservative criteria, the system can be fully designed and be capable of handling
higher flows, velocities, and pressures in localized areas.
The model was initially analyzed in a `built -out' scenario. This initial model run
served to determine the necessary pipe sizes throughout the system. The next step
was to break the system into logical, constructable `Phases'. Seven total Phases
were developed, as shown on Figure 4 -1. The model was then run for each Phase,
in sequence, to determine if the pipe sizes required for the ultimate scenario will be
adequate for each intermediate scenario. The Phases and modeling results are
further detailed in Section 5.
l r 1 � � ^��• "'
i
f ,
Y
0
• -�_
0
a = =
, f p s
f �t
r , n
►J
Lj
r�
Q
Q fa
m m m m m m a
0
s
_ 1 �
Il
D�
m 0
Z
z m
z:u
NONE=
D
� � 9
l
1
� 1
a
I
�
�A�++�
Scales NONE
PHASING MAP
�
n
�
Dete: 11-17-200:5
�p f? 1 G d II $ 11 d f E ail
No: W04111
��-�+� �y ■�
CITY OF W INTER ER SPRINGS
�7fi84Rl�a� �� flrb�iq R 3�1
F"= WIMP= F= WmL
�pft nu°
RECLAIMED WATER AUGMENTATION STUDY
�yy
1 1,
�
1�
City of Winter S rin s — Reclaimed Water Augmentation Study Pacie No. 4 -5
4.3 Treatment System Analysis
4.. 1 Reclaimed Water su 1
The Water Reclamation Facilities have a combined treatment capacity of 4.082
MGD. They are currently running at approximately 2.32 IVIGD. As the City grows, the
wastewater supply to the WRF's will grow as well. However, if reclaimed water
irrigation systems are requ ired on all new developments, more reclaimed water vwriII
be required than is generated by each new development, e.g., sewerage flows
generated by new households are about one -third of the irrigation demand.
Therefore, the needs of the system were determined based on the current supply
and potential demand for reclaimed water. Based on the needs previously
discussed in Section 3.0 and this section, the total annual average daily demand is
estimated to be a approximately 5.0 IVID. This yields a shortage of approximately
2. 25 IVIGD AAD F (4.73 MGD dry season as described above) if we are to provide all
projected secondary uses (non - potable) with a separate water supply source, a.k.a.,
reclaimed and augmentation water.
The main sources for irrigation water augmentation are: surface water, ground
water, or stormuwrater. one of the purposes of this expansion of the reclaimed water
system is to take demand off of the aquifer, which is the primary potable water
source for the area. Therefore, using ground water (including shallow wells) as an
augmentation source serves no beneficial purpose except in the case of the
artesian well described in section 4.1. Storm water systems are a viable source of
Iow volume irrigation needs. Most storm water systems are not designed to hold
excess water, which can be used for irrigation. They are not large reservoirs
available for use when needed by the demand. They are scattered throughout the
City and multiple pump stations and treatment facilities would be required. Further,
many stormuwrater system have no available water or are completer dry during the
dry season when the augmentation water would be needed most. The surface water
option is the most feasible and beneficial. Central Winds Park, which is owned by
the City, borders on Labe Jesup. Property adjacent to the park has been purchased
by the City Utility Department. This adjacent property can easily accommodate a
Facility to withdraw and treat the surface water to reclaimed water standards to be
blended into the existing reclaimed water distribution system.
4.3.2. Treatment of Surface Water
The treatment process required on Lake Jesup water would not be a difficult one.
The water quality is within normal surface water ranges, and the proposed use is
non - potable. Therefore, many chemical parameters can remain unchanged.
Nutrient removal would not be required to utilize the surface grater for public access
irrigation purposes. It is required that the water be safe from a bacteriological
standpoint and as such, the suspended solids would have to be reduced so that the
cily of Winter Springs -- Declaimed Water Augmentation Study . Page Igo. 4 -6
chlorination processes can properly remove ( "kill ") the bacteria that may exist in the
surface water. The current standards do not require a chlorine residual in the
distribution system and even if they did, this would not be difficult to accomplish.
Water must moot high -level disinfection criteria prior to leaving the treatment facility
or the "Point of Entry" into the distribution system.
The treatment process must meet the following criteria to be viable as an
augmentation system:
Must be flexible in terms of capacity of flow treated and on -off
conditions,
2. Must be easily started and usable water must be immediately
available to the distribution system.
3. Must be able to withstand extended downtime without adverse affects
on treatment.
The treatment provided will be lour service supply pumps, filtration, transfer pumps,
storage, disinfection via the storage tanks and high service distribution pumps. Lake
Jesup also acts as a storage reservoir and the treatment facility needs to be
designed as an Don- demand" system. We recommend that the facility be operated
as a supplemental facility in all aspects. The facility should be connected into the
+ ADA System and when needed, it will be activated and the pumps will supply
flow to the filters. If demand drops off, the system will be automatically shut down.
Monitoring of turbidity will be required and if either fails to meet the requirement, the
system will be shut down.
To accomplish our goals, it will be necessary to have a filter system that can sit idle
and then be called into use and also provide a variable rate flow without degradation
of filtration ability. We believe the only filters that can achieve this is the fabric disk
type filter or the coarse filter membranes suspended in a tank. Further research
would be required during the preliminary engineering design phase of this project.
We evaluated the pressure disk type filters for another project and found that they
could not remove the algae from pond grater to a low enough concentration to meet
public access criteria. This pond was a "controlled" environment and did not have
the TSS contaminants like Lake Jesup. The Turbidity and TSS parameters were
much too high to be removed without chemical addition. Further research is
required to find the best treatment option,
The filter backwash would be sent to the West WRF via the lift station / forcemain
system. The backwash generated will depend on the treatment process and will
also need to be evaluated during preliminary design.
4.3.2.1 Filtration Evaluation
City of Winter SiDrings — Reclaimed Water Aucimentation Study Page No. 4 -7
Plastic Disk Screens — Two years ago we tested a product in Eustis on a reclaimed
water holding pond. This was a hypalon lined pond at their hayfield disposal site.
The disc filter was an in -lire pressure filter system. The discs are plastic and
separation occurs by serrations in the discs. During filtration, the discs are
compressed together and they expand during backwashing. This system cannot
produce turbidity levels below 5 T s. Much of the algae in the pond was forced
through the openings and not separated. TSS levels "in" were 30-35 nag /l and "out"
were 10-15 mg/l. This product would not be acceptable for our needs on this project.
S tainless Steel Filter Screens — Two years ego we tested a stainless steel filter
screen at the East W F. This product was used on the effluent from the holding
pond. It did not produce satisfacto results.
Pressure Stainless Steel Screens — This is a similar product to the plastic disk
screen and has the same problem of ush`in solids through the screen under
p g g
pressure.
Fabric Covered Disk Filters — The City of Eustis main wastewater treatment plant
has fabric disk filters b Aqua Aerobics. These have been in lace for several
]� � p years
and are operating with no problems. We believe this type of filter meets the criteria
above and we also know they can meet a 5 TSS criteria. The filters can sit inactive
for long periods of time with no adverse affects. When placed out-of-service, they
must be backwashedlcleaned and placed on standby.
Dyna -Sand — These filters were eliminated from further consideration because they
need to be constantly operated to prevent them from `binding ". They work on the
principle of a fluidized bed and if they are left alone, the media has a tendency to
"solidify ". We do not recommend this filtration system for this project.
Gravity Sand Filters — These filters were also eliminated from further consideration
because they need to be constantly operated to prevent therm from "binding ". We do
not recommend this filtration system for this project.
Membranes — Membranes are used on a variety of project and we believe they can
be used for this application as well. They are a viable candidate and can be left in
the `wet" condition and operated when needed, Farther consideration should be
given to this product.
4.3.3 Labe Lesup Augmentation
The Lake Jesup grater quality was evaluated to determinate what kind of treatment
is necessary before it can be pumped into the network. To complete this objective
the last 6 gears physical - chemical data reports for this grater was analyzed. The
data was supplied by the St. Johns Fivers Water Management District (SJRWMD)
and it corresponds to the daily data of the samples taken in seven different points
around the lake from 1997-2002. The data includes the values for the pH, TSS,
city of Winter Svin -gs — Reclaimed Water Augmentation Study P age N 4 -8
TDs, Chloride, and sulfate. This data is attached in Appendix A. Monthly and
annual averages as well as seasonal variations were analyzed for each parameter.
These parameters were then compared against the minimum requirements set forth
by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. FDEP requires that all
waters entering reclaimed water systems must meet the same standards as the
wastewater facility permit. The FDEP requires high -level disinfection and Total
Suspended Solids reduction to meet the public access reuse criteria (6-
610.47)a1 ). Another criteria is to compare these values with the secondary
Drinking Water Standards and is shown in Table 4 -1. It compares the quality of the
surface grater to secondary drinking grater standards. Also shown in Table 4 -1 is
each parameters average, dry, and Bret season value as accumulated by the
JRWD.
The total dissolved solids (TDS) value averages between 550 to 750 Img /L
throughout the year. The TDS typically peals at around 750 mg /L during the June
and July summer season. This timefrarne also presents the highest peaks of the
year, with the highest recorded value being almost 1200 mg /L. The annual average
TDS concentration is approximately 630 mg /L. The secondary drinking water
standard value for this parameter is a maximum of Soo mg /L.
Sulfates average between 40 and 80 mg /L per month with an annual average of
approximately 61 mg /L. The secondary drinking water standard value is 50mg /L.
There were no samples in the seven year period that exceeded the secondary
drinking grater standard.
Chlorides average between 170 and 340 mg /L per month with an annual average of
approximately 250 mg /L. The secondary drinking grater standard value for chlorides
is 250 mg/L. This standard is typically exceeded from Larch to August. The
maximum recorded value was close to Soo mg /L. Chlorides could be a problem
because high chlorides have an adverse effect on vegetation
The TSS value averages between 20 to 65 ,rig /L per month with an annual average
of approximately 35 mg /L. The FDEP standard value for TSS is 5 mg /L. The Ts
typically peaks in June with a recorded high of 97 mg /L. The treatment system
needs to be capable of reducing the TSS by 31 mg /L on average and by 61 ,rig /L
during peak conditions.
The pH of the water is typically between 8.0 and 9.5 throughout of the year. During
the summer season the pH increases to a ,maximum of g.. The secondary drinking
water standard for pH is between 6.5 and 8.5.
All of the parameters shove a tendency to peak around June -duly and reach a lour
point around November - December. Overall, the treatability of the grater from Lake
Jesup to non- potable public access irrigation standards is good. Options to treat this
water to FDEP standards is further discussed herein. Irrigation demand is generally
City of Winter rin s — Reclaimed Water Augmentation Study Page No. 4 -9
lower in June /July due to rainfall and therefore, the augmentation system would not
be fully utilized during this timeframe.
Table 4wl . Lae Jesup Water Quality Data AM
Parameter
Units
Secondary Drinking
Water Levels
Average
Dry
season
Wet
season
Field PH
6.5-8.5
8.69
9.43
7.89
Total Suspended
Solids
mg /I
b
35.43
65.49
20.63
Chloride
mg /l
250
250.11
338.38
176.06
Sulfate
mg /l
250
61.1
81.04
40.78
Total Dissolved
Solids
Mg1I
500
631.46
753.09
543.80
This water quality data represents key grater quality indicators and by no means
represents all the possible contaminants that could be in the surface grater. This
available data, however, does provide us with the ability to decide if surface water
augmentation from Lake Jesup is feasible. We believe that these parameters
indicate that Lake Jesup grater can be used as an augmentation source and that
they may supply the 'needs of the City without adverse affects on the reclaimed
water s
None of these known parameters are at consistent high level concentrations that
would cause any known effects on landscape plants or grasses. luny people utilize
lake and storm graters for landscape irrigation without any treatment. This grater
should substitute directly for reclaimed water; Labe Jesup is not a typical source of
surface water. water quality- parameters tend to be on the higher side of
concentrations and are bumping up against the concentrations that cause
agricultural concerns. Generally, chloride buildup in the soil may have an adverse
effect on plants. The literature indicates that chlorides less than 500 rig /l and TD
less than 1 000 mg /I will not have an adverse effect on plants. In addition, this grater
will be blended with effluent from the Water Reclamation Facilities. The annual
average values are within normal tolerant ranges.
4.4 Reclaimed storage
The recommended storage capacity is four (4) million gallons and is equivalent to
one day's flow rate. The storage will be matched to the flog rate by two phases.
Each phase will include a two (2) million gallon storage tank. Storage allows the
treatment facilities to operate over a 4 - period and the distribution system to
operate over a demand period of shorter duration. Current grater conservation
regulations do not allover irrigation between the hours of 10 A.M. to 4 F.M. and only
twice per week. This is the even /odd uncle. This leaves too many days unused and
an inefficient gray of sizing equipment because there are three days left over in
City of Winter sprin a — Reclaimed Water Augmentation Study Pa-ge No. 4 -10
every creek. Irrigation is allowed over 10 hours, but many households like to water
in the morning hours; typically before 9 A.M. and after 1 A.M. (an eight -hour
indoor). New rules are proposed that may revise current regulations especially
concerning the days of allowable irrigation. The goal of the city would be to have
the demand spread evenly over the longest cycle. Irrigation of reclaimed water
(including supplementation) is allowed 24 hours per day provided there is a sign on
the property indicating that reclaimed water is being used.
4.5 site Plan
Figure 4. 2 shows a preliminary site plan for an equipment building, filtration, transfer
pump station, access driveway, two (2) tiro - million gallon storage tanks and five (
distribution pumps (can turbines). chlorination, if required, will be fed directly into
the ground storage tanks. As described elsewhere in this report, the improvements
will be constructed in two phases.
m
0
r L 3nN30 30 NV 80 mono MOM
Edm@
asaw MEMO
-n
m G)
z
-13
c L
13 cn
M
to
c
c; m
z
z
cil
co
fi
rn
1
Z M
r
Scale: 1'= 60'
Sur PROPOSED SITE PLAN -13
AUGMENTATION TREATMENT AND STORAGE 0
pe AtvkfWw DRIF: 11-17-2005
WU41 11 m
w imp w . c p k r x g I ii e r r a , v u pir ob No.. WINTER SPRINGS —4 M
1117r- eltmW- r:L OrMwe% IL W .zl C. �h Acipre of Adi - at,.jlHjw RECLAIMED WATER AUGMENTATION STUDY 171
City of Winter Springs — Reclaimed Water Augmentation study Page No. 5 -1
SECTION 5
SYSTEM EXPANSION
5.0 system Expansion
As discussed in Section 4, the expansion of the system to supply reclaimed or
alternate source grater throughout the City was divided into ten Phases. This
Section will discuss the necessary facility improvements and the necessary
infrastructure (piping) improvements. These improvements will be correlated to each
other to provide a cohesive picture of how the system will develop through the
Phases.
.'I Treatment system Expansion
The withdrawal and treatment of surface water from Lake Jesup can be
implemented in Phases according to the amount of augmentation water required.
Based on data obtained from the city, the system currently would benefit from
augmentation water. After completion of the seven distribution system expansion
Phases, the ultimate projected augmentation quantity is 2.25 MID AADF. Two
1.125 M D Treatment Pluses are proposed to meet the needs of the City as
further described below.
To withdraw augmentation water from Lake Jesup and put it in the reclaimed water
distribution system requires treatment as described in Section 4.2.2, Most of the
augmentation will occur during the dry season, therefore the augmentation facility
must be designed based on the treatment levels in Table 5-1.
4
Tale 5-1. Labe Jesup Water unlit Data I Removal Criteria
Parameter
Units
Required
Leve Is
Pre- Treatment
Levels
% Removal
Field PH
N/A
9.4
Total suspended
Solids
mg /l
b
65
92.4
Chloride
mg /l
NIA
338
Sulfate
mg /l
N/A
81
Total Dissolved
Solids
ma /l
NIA
75
The Lake Jesup water will have to be treated to public access and high-level
disinfection standards, requiring filtration and disinfection. The augmentation facility
will need the following components: surface water withdrawal pumping station;
coagulation; filtration system; disinfection system; and distribution pumping station.
City of Winter SpHngs — Reclaimed Ureter Augmentation Study Page No. 5 -2
Phn�qp. A
The first Phase of the augmentation system will have a capacitor of 1.125 IVIGD
AADF. The augmentation site will be located in Central Winds Park as shown in
Figure -1 and will consist of the following components:
Surface water withdrawal pumping station. The pumping station will be
designed to withd 1.125 MGD AADF from Lake Jesup. The suction
piping can be laid horizontally into the Labe. Measures should be
provided to prevent clogging by fish, algae growth, etc. of the suction /inlet
pipe.
2 . The surface water shall be filtered to meet reuse requirements as
specified by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection.
3 . The disinfection system must meet high -level disinfection criteria as
requ by FDEP. we believe this can be met by the wet wells and
storage system.
Phase A would have a capacity of 1.1 MILD AADF and is estimated to cos
approximately $2,646,420, as detailed in Table 5-2.
Ta'bli:S- Z Trxatai Facilit
ITEM
Total cost
obilizationl i te work ( 5%)
Low Service Suppler Pump (3
p umps )
$75
Coagulation Chemical Feed
$50
Filtration
$ 50,000
Wetwells / Tanks
$200,000
Disinfection System
$50,000
Artesian Well Pump Station
$75,000
Artesian SyRply Line
$171
Electrical /Control Building
$30,000
CADA
$25
Electrical
$105
Storage — 2.0 M
$750
DIst6bution Pump Station (
can pumps
$150,000
Residual Backwash Pump
Station
$75,000
Conting
$200,000
Design/Surv ( 7%
$140,420
Le a I /Ad min istrative /etc. 5%
$100,000
Construction Administration
(5
$100,000
TOTAL
$
C ity of Winter springs — Reclaimed Water Augmentation Study Page No. 5 -3
Phi .qp- R
Phase B should be constructed as a duplicate parallel facility to Phase A, as shown
in Figure 4 -. Several items do not require duplication. The costs are estimated to
be 1 x 610,400 and are shorn in Table 5-3 with no increase due to inflation.
T M, 5-3. Treatment,Fa Lty gists
ITEM Total Cost
Mobilization /Site work ON
$61,000
Lour Service supply Pump (
p
50,000
Filtration
$250,000
cADA
$15
Electrical
55
Storag — 2.0
750,000
Distribution Pump station (
can um s
100,000
C ontingency 10% )
$122,000
Design/Survey ( 7%
$
La al /Administrativeletc. 5�/� )
$61,000
Construction Administration
(5
61 X 000
TOTAL
I s 61 0
�
Distribution System Expansion
Takla -4 lists the proposed expansion Phases and the projected demand of each
Phase. The following analysis assumes that connection will not be mandatory and
80% of the connections will be rude and reclaimed water will actually be used at
the projected rate. The cost of constructing additional distribution systems is based
on an average of Soo per connection and includes piping, restoration and
services and meters.
Table" . D Q stri' ution 4stem Expansfor, '"
bear
Phase
Potential
Percent
Con
Peak
Averag
cumulative
Connac-
Connected
Demand
Demand
Demand
tions
JMGD
MGM
MGM
Existing
.400
1.800
1.800
008
1
1024
80
819
0.737
0.491
2 .291
2010
2
1001
80
800
0.720
0.480
2.771
2012
3
1029
80
823
0.741
0.494
3.265
2014
4
1021
80
817
0.735
0.490
3.755
2016
5
1 029
80
823
0.741
0.494
4.249
2018
6
946
80
757
0.681
0.454
4.703
oo
7
622
80
498
0.448
0.299
5.000
TOTAL
6672
5338
5.660
4.530
5.000
Cit y of Winter Sodngs — Redaimed Water Augmentation Stud Page No. 5 -4
Phase A of the augmentation treatment plant will last through the end Phase 3
(WRF flow 2.3 MGD and augmentation flow of 1.125 MGID equals 3.425 D) of
the distribution system expansion' In 2012, Phase B of the augmentation facilities
would be constructed.
Pha -qp� 1
This Phase will be constructed to moot the demand created by 1 024 residential lots.
The total demand is estimated to be an average of 491,520 gallons per day. Table
5 -5 lists the developments included in this Phase and the seasonal demands.
In coordination of the construction of Phase 1 of the distribution system, Phase A of
the Lake Jesup Augmentation Facility should be constructed.
. a pacit Dat �80% on eQt ) - - - --
SUBDIVISION
Total
Average
Dry
Wet
Averag
Dry -
Wet
NAME
Lots
Flow/
Season
Season
Flow
Season
Season
U nit
Flow/
Flog/
(gpd)
Flog
Flow
(gpd)
Unit
grit
(gpd)
(gpd)
Arbor Glen (Tuse.
35
000
900
300
22,800
34,200
11
Parcel 0
Carrington
70
000
900
300
45,600
53
22,300
Woods
Chestnut Estates
49
600
000
300
29,400
44 100
14,700
Davenport G len
70
000
000
300
4
63
2 1
Glen Eagl
257
500
900
300
154,200
231, 300
77
Highlands See. 3
26
000
900
300
1
23,400
7
Highlands Section
53
500
900
300
34,300
52
17
7 -3
North Orlando
155
600
000
300
93
13%500
46,500
Terrace Sec 3 -5
Oak Forest Unit 4
75
000
900
300
45,000
57,500
22,500
Oak Forest Unit 5
94
000
000
300
50
34
28
Tuskawilla Unit
87
000
000
300
52,200
73
20
12/12A
Tu skawilla U
30
000
900
300
23,400
35,100
11
13
Total
1024
614,400
921-
307,200
80% facto
819
491 ,520
737,280
245, 760
The cast of this Phase is estimated to be $2,047,500.
City of Winter Springs — ReGialmed Water Augmentation Study Page No. 5 -5
Phases
This Phase will he constructed to meet the demand created by 800 residential lots.
The total demand is estimated to he an average of 480,000 gallons per day. Table
5 -6 lists the developments included in this Phase and the seasonal demands.
bI a 5-6 h i e 2 - CapaClft y a (80%n - nmact ad
SUBDIVISION
Total
Average
Dry
Wet
Average
Dry
Wet
NAIIi'IE
Units
Flow/
Season
Season
Flow
Season
Season
Unit
Flow/
Flow/
(gpd)
Flow
Flow
(gpd)
Unit
Unit
(gpd)
(gpd)
Chelsea Woods s -
135
600
900
300
81,000
121,500
4o, 500
South
Highlands
131
600
900
300
78
117,900
39,300
Sections 4 -5
North Orlando 1
95
600
900
300
57X0
85
28
Addition
North Orlando
123
boo
900
300
73
110
36, 00
Terrace Sec 8 -9
Unit
Oak Forest Unit 3
114
boo
900
300
68,400
102,600
34,200
Oak Forest Unit 8
131
boo
900
300
78,600
11 7,900
390300
Tuscawilla Unit
72
boo
900
300
43,200
64,800
21
11A111B
Tuscawilla Unit 8
78
600
900
300
46,300
70,200
230400
W i ldwood - East
122
boo
900
300
73,200
109,800
3600
Total
1001
600,600
9OO
300
80% factor
800
1
1
1 480,000
7209000
240900
The infrastructure cost of this Phase is estimated to he $2,000 000 .
City of Winter B — Reclaimed Water Au Stud Pa No. 5-6
Phase 3
This Phase will be constructed to meet the demand created b 823 residential lots.
The total demand is estimated to be an avera of 617.,400 g allons per da Table
5-7 lists the developments included in this Phase and the seasonal demands.
- A %
Table 5-7 Pha:sa 3 — Capocjk Data ( 801!".10 C.'arinect-au
SUBDIVISIONS Total Avera Dr wet Avera Dr Wet
Units Flow/ Season Season Flow Season Season
Unit Flow/ Flow/ ( Flow Flow
( Unit Unit (g pd ) (
(g pd ) (9 p
Bear Creek Estates
67
600
900
300
401200
60,300
20
Foxmoor Unit 1
81
600
900
300
482600
72,900
24,300
Section 1
117
600
900
300
70,200
1 O5j3OO
35,100
- Hi g hlands
North Orlando
113
600
900
300
67,800
101,700
33,900
North Orlando
Terraces Unit 3
74
44,400
669600
22,200
North Orlando
Terraces Unit 6
48
600
900
300
2800
43
14,400
Oak Forest Unit 6
154
600
900
300
92,400
1387600
46,200
Oak Forest Unit 7
93
600
900
300
55,800
83,700
27,900
Tuscawilla Unit 11
28
600
900
300
163800
25t200
8A00
Tuscawilla Unit 6
90
600
900
300
54,000
81 P000
27,00
Tuseawilla Unit
MA
88
600
900
300
5200
79,200
26A00
Tuscawilla Unit 9B
76
600
900
300
45,600
68,400
22,800
Total
1029 _F
617,400
926,100
308,700
% factor
923
I
493,920
740,81101
—
246,960J
The infrastructure cost of this Phase is estimated to be $2,057,500
C ily of Winter SpOngs — Declaimed Water Augmentation Study Pam No. 5 -7
Ph;ip, 4
This Phase 11 be constructed to meet the demand created by 817 residential lots.
The total demand is estimated to be an average of 490,080 gallons per day. Table
5-8 lists the developments included in this Phase and the seasonal demands.
In coordination of the construction of Phase 4, construction of Phase B of the Lake
Jesup Augmentation Facility is necessary and construction will start during the prior
year.
Table 6-8 F I - ta ne 4 -.. Capacity Deta D Q cm n
_
SUBDIVISIONS
Total
Units
-
Average
Flow/
Unit
(gpd)
Dry
Season
Flog/
Unit
(
Wet
Season
Flow /
Unit
d
Average
Flow
Dry
season
Flow
(gpd)
wet
season
Flow
(gpd)
Arrowhead Unit 1
( Northern Wa
6
600
900
300
3
57400
000
Bentley Green/Club
00
600
900
300
30,000
591400
10,500
Chestnut Fridge
52
600
900
300
3 1, 200
46X0
15,600
Fairway Oaks
72
600
900
300
45,200
04,500
21
Foxm oor East
35
600
900
300
211000
31,500
1 O x 500
Foxmoor Units 2 -3
100
000
900
300
114,000
171,000
57
Jackson Circle
10
000
900
300
0,000
99000
3,000
Oak Forest Units
2l2A2 B
103
600
000
300
97,800
146,700
48,900
St Johns Landing
51
000
900
300
18
27,000
9
The Reserve at
Tuseawilla Ph 1-
92
000
900
300
55
52,900
27,600
Tuseawil I a Trace
24
600
000
300
1 4,400
210600
7
Tuseawil I a Unit 7
70
600
000
300
47,400
71
2 3, 700
Walden Terrace
63
000
000
300
37,800
56
1 5,000
Winter Springs
Unit 4 — East
138
000
000
500
52
1242200
41
Total
SOT factor
1 021
817
612
490,080
918,900
735,120
305,400
244,320
The infrastructure cost of this Phase is estimated to be $2,042.,500
City of Winter Sodnqs — Reclaimed Water Augmentation, Study _ Page Igo. 5 -$
PhgsP fi
This Phase will be constructed to meet the demand created by 823 residential lots.
The total demand is estimated to be an average of 479,520 gallons per day. Table
5-9 lists the developments included in this Phase and the seasonal demands.
T a , i a 5 Phase 6 - Capacity Data M Can n ct )
SUBDIVISIONS
Total
Average
Dry
Wet
Average
Dry
Wet
Units
Flow/
Season
Season
Flow
Season
Season
Unit
Flow/
Flow/
(glad)
Flog
Flow
(gpd)
Unit
Unit
(gpd)
(gpd)
(gpd)
(gpd)
North Orlando 2
165
600
900
300
81
148
49
Addition
North Orlando
291
600
000
300
174,600
261,900
87
Ranches 8 -10
Oak Forest Unit 1
114
600
000
300
68,400
102,600
34,200
Wicklow reens
48
600
000
300
28 ; 800
43,200
14,400
Winter Springs
383
600
000
300
229
344
114, 00
Unit 4 -V eat
Wood stream
28
600
900
300
16,800
250200
8,400
Total
1029
599,400
920,100
3089700
80% factor
823
479,520
740,880
1 246,900
The infrastructure cost of this Phase is estimated to be $2.,057,500
City of Winter Springs — Reclaimed Water Augmentation Study Page No. 5 -9
Phase 6
This Phase will he constructed to meat the demand created by are estimated 80% of
the 757 residential lots. The total demand is estimated to he an average of 1 95,200
gallons per day. Table 5 -10 lists the developments included in this Phase and the
seasonal demands.
Table 5-10 Ph as — Capacity Data ( % Cr 04-1 l .� (it' ad)
SUBDIVISIONS
Total
Average
Dry
wet
Average
Dry
wet
Units
Flow/
Season
Season
Flow
Season
Season
Unit
Flog/
Flow/
(gpd)
Flow
Flow
(glad)
Unit
Unit
(gpd)
(gpd)
(
d
Mt Greenwood
73
600
900
300
43,800
65,700
21,900
Unit 1
Mt G
150
600
900
300
93,600
140
46, 8OO
Unit 5
North Or la n do
218
600
900
300
130,800
196 t 00
65
Addition
North Orlando
22
600
900
300
13
1 9, 800
6
Ranches Sec 1
Bahama
North Orlando
221
600
900
300
132,600
1 98, 900
66,300
Punches Sac
MA
North Orlando
60
600
900
300
36,000
54
18
Ranches Sac 3-
5
Winter Springs
202
600
900
300
121
181
6000
Units 2-
Total
946
571200
866,800
285
80% factor
757
456 960
685
228
Th infrastructu cost of this Ph i s estimated to he $1,892,500.
Cily of Winter Springs — Reclaimed Water Augmentation Study Page N0. 5 -10
Phase 7
This Phase will he constructed to meet the demand created by 498 residential lots.
The total demand is estimated t0 he an average Of 298,560 gallons per day. Table
5 -11 lists the developments included in this Phase and the seasonal demands.
c Tab lee 5. 1 P h a n °— Caps � t rZt °( 0% n e -Cte
SUBDIVISIONS
Total
Average
Dry
wet
Average
Dry
wet
Units
Flow/
Season
season
Flog
season
season
Unit
Flow/
Flow/
(gpd)
Flow
Flow
(gpd)
Unit
Unit
(gpd)
(gpd)
d )
(gpd
Dunmar
20
000
900
300
12
1 0,000
0
North Orlando
115
000
900
300
60
103,500
34
Ranches es Sec
1MA11 13
Forth Orlando
04
600
900
300
50,400
75
2 5, 200
Ranches Sec 6 -7
Parkst0 ne
300
000
000
300
237,600
356,400
118,800
T u scawi l la Unit 5
7
000
000
300
4
6
2,1100
Total
622
373
559
186,600
80% factor
498
298
447
149,280
The infrastructure cost Of this Ph is estimated t0 be 4 00 0 .
C ity of Winter Springs - Reclaimed Water Augmentation Study Paw No. 5 -11
Table 5-12 is a compilation of the data of Sections 3, 4 and 5, shoring the available
effluent, projected demand (ADF and Peak) and the augmentation required to meet
the demands. The projected demands for irrigation water includes an existing value
of 1.8 M D AADF and 2.4 MGD dry season demand for existing residential
customers, the two golf courses and the Central binds Park demands.
T able -1 . u gTf n Nee ds
Year Irrigation Lake Effluent Average Augmentation Peak Augmentation
Ending Phase Jesup Available Reclaim Needed Reclaim Needed
September Prase Deeded (Average) Needed (Dry Season)
30
2005
2.32
1.8
N/A
2.4
NIA
2006
2.35
1.8
N/A
2.4
N/A
2007
A
2.37
1.8
N/A
2A
N/A
2003
1
2.40
0
3.14
0.74
cog
2.43
2.29
o
3.14
0.71
2010
2
2.46
2.77
0.31
3.36
1.40
2011
2.49
2.77
0.23
3.36
1.37
2012
3
2.52
3.27
0.75
4.60
2.0
2013
B
2.55
3.27
0.72
4.60
2.05
2014
4
2.53
3.76
1.18
5.33
2.75
2015
2.61
3.76
1.15
5.33
2.72
2016
5
2.64
4.25
1.61
6.07
3.43
2017
2.68
4.25
1.57
6.07
3.39
2013
6
2.71
4.70
1.99
6.75
4.04
2019
2.74
4,70
1.96
6.75
4.01
2 020
7
2.77
5.00
2.23
7.20
4.43
City of Winter rin s — Reclaimed Water Augmentation Studv Page No. 6 -1
SECTION 6
PERMITTING
6 .0 FDEP
The FDEP is responsible for permitting the use of the treated lake water as a
supplemental source for use within the reclaimed water system. FDEP will review
the process equipment and design and check for compliance with the provisions of
the Reclaim 'water Rules. We must go through this process because we are
blending the lake water with reclaim water from two treatment facilities. FDEP will
be concerned with the water quality and that the supplemental grater use will not
cause a violation of the wastewater permits.
�11;ATA Tj 111
A Consumptive Use Permit is required from SJRWMD. They will evaluate the
proposed volume of water being withdrawn from the lake and determine the
acceptable amount by permit. They will also loop at the secondary effects of
reducing the grater flog in Lake Jesup and the effects of withdrawal during low
seasonal flows.
We recommend a preliminary meeting with SJRWMD to discuss this report and the
future plans of the City. We need to develop a dialogue with the District and have
both parties work toward a positive goal of reducing groundwater d and
increasing lower quality water for irrigation. We also recommend involvement of the
public at a very early stage in this process.
Cit y of Winter Springs — Reclaimed Water Augmentation Study Page No. 7 -1
SECTION 7
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
7.0 Conclusions and Recommendations
The project is feasible and would provide the City with a secondary source of water.
The project would reduce groundwater withdrawals, thereby providing good potable
groundwater in the future. We recommend that the City pursue the following:
Discussion with SJRWMD on the project and coordination with "The Friends
of Lake Jesup
2) Proceed with an application of a Consumptive Use Permit.
3) Upon approval, proceed with pilot testing of the recommended treatment
options.
4) Proceed with a design with known data from pilot testing.
5) Proceed with design(s) to expand the reclaimed distribution system.
APPENDIX
City of Winter Springs
Lake Jesup Augmentation
Preliminary Engineering Report, December 2008
CITY O-F WINT Rt- SPRINGS
LAKE JESUP AUG M E-NTATI�1�
EA .1
NG. NEER1, NG
PF LIMINA-R"'V E
December 2008
1
Engla ��t� -rrt�w :�
e s CPH Engineers, Inc. — Orlando
r
� & Ardrftecm 1117 East Robinson Street
Orlando Florida 32801
aru;gmn nt (407) 425 -0452
CPH Project No. W04140
CcrIifi .•tee of tdiorizatz a ;i No, 0 11E - 2�.�
Section 1 - Executive summa!
This report was developed to identify four alternatives for the implementation of
the Labe Jesup Augmentation System. The following items are discussed;
1 An identification of the req u i red processes for treating the surface
grater from Labe Jesup
2 Conceptual layouts for the alternatives located at the Lake Jesup site.
3) The placement of several components /processes offsite
4) Landscaping and construction techniques to disguise the process
equipment
We recommend that these alternatives be presented to the City Commission for
their input. Upon receipt of their comments, we can proceed with the chosen
program and begin the design and permitting process.
During earlier reports on the reclaimed water system and the Labe Jesup
augmentation system, we recommended that the water from the artesian well (in
the Parkstone Subdivision) be routed over to the Labe Jesup Augmentation site
and commingled with the treated Labe Jesup water. Since that time, samples of
the water from the artesian well have been taken. It is apparent that the water
quality is very good and that the artesian well water could be placed directly into
the reclaimed water system in accordance with F D E P Rules. We recommend
that the City pursue the implementation of a small pump station adjacent to the
artesian well and that this station be equipped with pumps to pump the water
directly into the reclaimed water system at pressures compatible with the
reclaimed grater distribution system. The pump station should be connected to
the City SCADA system and the system must be operated in accordance with the
issued CUP.
Section 2 - required Processes /components
1 Intake Structure — an intake structure will be constructed from the shore
into Lake Jesup. The structure will be constructed as a boat
dock/observation platform. The dock will allow the public to walk out and
view the lakefront from the central Winds Park site. The intake piping will
be under the walkway and the observation platform at the end of the dock.
The dock/walkway will be constructed to protect the intake piping of the
augmentation system from debris and boating activity. The platform at the
end of the intake structure will be covered with a "hip" style metal roof.
2) Intake Pumping Station — a submersible low head pumping structure will
be required to lift the water from Lake Jesup into the Actif to treatment
units. This system will be very similar to a standard submersible
wastewater lift station. No components will be visible above grade. The
top of the structure will be placed above the 1 00-year flood elevation;
10.05 based on the 1 929 datum. We recommend that this pumping
system be set -up as a triplex station to allow for the future expansion of
the augmentation treatment system and also provide for the back-up
capabilities required for environmental treatment facilities. We also
recommend that the station be equipped with variable speed pumps to
allow treatment flow capacity flexibility.
3) Ba rsc ree n — a ba rscreen is required in front of the Actiflo treatment unit to
protect the treatment process from lame items that may cause damage to
the treatment unit. The manufacturer of the Actiflo unit requires a
maximum solids size of 2 mm passing the barscreen.
4) Flaw Water Treatment Unit — we recommend an Actiflo treatment unit for
this project. It offers flexibility in flog capacitor; it can be started and
stopped (depending on demand) with minimal consequences on treatment
quality; and, it has been proven effective on treating surface water to the
required "Public Access" treatment levels required for augmentation of the
reclaimed water.
5) Filtration — filters could be added at a future date. We believe that the
water quality required for this project can be obtained without filtration.
However, it is prudent to plan for future requirements that may be stricter
than current regulations. One such future concern is the removal of
ryptosporidium. we believe that if the regulations required removal of
this type of bacteria, then filtration would be required. Therefore, we have
shown additional space in the site plan to allow for filter installation.
6} Storage — Storage of treated clean grater available to augment the
reclaimed system is recommended. During the peak demand periods of
the year, it may be advisable to operate the system for a 24 hour period.
Since irrigation demand occurs over an 18 hour period (maximum),
storage for approximately 6 hours of supply is required. Also, storage will
allover the system to treat and supply Lake Jesup grater over the longer
period of time to supply the demand and allover a smaller capital
investment. We do not have to match treatment supply directly to the
demand. It is our recommendation that the tank be constructed below the
ground surface and serge as an observation deck and possible pavillion.
The building style storage tank will also shield some of the other treatment
items. Please see our attached diagrams.
7) High Service Pumping — High service pumps will supply the augmentation
grater directly into the reclaimed grater distribution system. We propose a
portion of the storage tank building to be a pumping facility.
8) Wastewater Pump Station — A small wastewater pump station is required
to transport the waste generated by the treatment process to the
wastewater treatment facility. For every million gallons treated, there is
approximately 2.5% or reject material (25,000 gallons). Therefore, if we
treat 1 MGD, we will have a waste product of 25,000 gallons or a flow rate
of approximately 18 gpm AADF /million gallons treated.
Section 3 - offsite Components
The rain items that need to remain at the Labe Jesup site are the Intake
Structure and the Intake Pumping Structure. All other components could be
placed at a remote site. In order to use a remote site, the intake Pumping Station
would have to be increased i n horsepower to del the raw grater to the
treatment unit.
One possible remote site is the reclaimed grater disposal area known separately
as Site 16; Site 17; Oak Forest spray site; and, the property owned by the city
between these sites. These sites are directly adjacent to one another. With the
advent of more reclaimed water going to residential irrigation demand, these
disposal sites are not now used on a regular basis and are used only as back -up
disposal sites. There is also additional unused available land at these sites.
Previously we analyzed Site 16 for the placement of a ground storage tank and
found that the subsurface soils conditions were not recommended for the support
of structural items. Soil injection grouting would be required. At the time we
decided to increase the storage capacity at the West Water Reclamation Facility
rather than pursue a re- pumping facility at Site 16. We did not examine the areas
directly adjacent to the location at Site 16. A storage tank could be placed in this
area with additional care and construction for the support of the tank. Additional
soils boring s would be required prior to placement of structures in this area.
Although these sites are close to each other, they all have very different terrain
and soils conditions.
Section 4 - Alternatives
We developed and analyzed four alternatives for equipment placement.
1) Alternative 1 — Conventional Storage and Treatment Layout at the Lake Jesup
Site
2) Alternative 2 — Enhanced Environmental Layout at the Lake Jesup site
3) Alternative 3 -- offsite Treatment and storage Alternative
4) Alternative 4 — Lake Jesup Treatment and Offsite storage Alternative
These alternatives are discussed below:
Aftemative 1— Conventional Layout Lake Jesup site
This alternative is the conventional treatment system located at the Lake Jesup
site. It includes the intake structure, pumping facilities, treatment facilities,
transfer pump station, a 2.0 Million gallon above grade storage tank, and high
service pumping. A separate storage building is required for the chemical storage
and feed systems.
Advantages:
1 ) The plan provides the most facility for the least amount of money as
there are no expenses for "special features ".
2) The plan provides the largest storage capacity at the "source" location.
3 Serves the needs of the utility reclaimed grater system.
4) Resolves pressure and flog problems at the Central Winds Park
irrigation system.
Disadvantages:
+1 ) The facility does not blend into the environment.
2 Landscaping costs are higher than the offsite alternative.
A ltemati ve 2 — Enhanced Environmental Layout Lake Jesup Site
This alternative is a modified version of the conventional treatment system. The
storage tank is constructed above and below grade to provide a volume of
approximately 250,000 gallons. The above grade portion of the storage tank is
constructed to shield the treatment facilities and to blend in with the surroundings
by using the top for an observation deck and pavillion. It also uses landscaping to
blend the storage tank in with the surroundings.
The garage portion of the building is the pumping, chemical storage and
electrical building. Access to the equipment is provided by a double garage door.
Skylights may be required to allow access and removal of the high service
pumps.
Under this plan, augmentation water will be pumped directly into the reclaimed
water distribution system after treatment. A secondary storage system will be
required offsite to provide the necessary storage requirements of the reclaimed
system (3 day minimum per regulations). The secondary system will work as an
offline system and provide water during peak usage times.
Advantages:
1 ) The plan provides adequate storage capacitor to meet the minimal daily
peaking needs of the system at the Lake Jesup site.
2 Serves the needs of the utility reclaimed water system.
3) Resolves pressure and flow problems at the Central Winds Park
irrigation system.
4) The facility blends into the environment and enhances the area.
Disadvantages:
1 ) The storage at the treatment plant site is smaller than optimal.
2) The costs are slightly higher for the enhancements and landscaping.
3 Additional storage and pumping facilities are required offsite.
Afte a ti ve 3 — Offsite Treatment and Storage Aite a Live
This alternative utilizes the conventional type layout, but planes the treatment
process, storage and high service pumping in the Site 16/17 area. site 16117 is
approximately 2.5 miles away from the Lake Jesup site.
Advantages:
1 ) The plan provides a cost effective treatment facility as there are no
expenses for `special features' due to its location.
2 The plan provides the larger storage capacity.
3) Serves the needs of the utility reclaimed water system.
4 ) At the proposed location, the facility does not need to blend in with the
environment. There are no houses or facilities in the area and it can he
screened by natural vegetation.
5) Location of the treatment and storage is at the midpoint of the
reclaimed system and provides a boost to both systems.
Disadvantages:
1) The treatment facility is over 2 -Y miles from the source water /intake
system.
2 Additional capital costs are required for the pipeline to transport the
water from Lake Jesup to the site.
) controls are required via the SCADA system for the remote operation
of the intake pump station.
4) Increased operational costs due to two locations versus the one site.
5 Does net resolve the pressure and flog problems of the central winds
Park irrigation system.
Alte ative 4 — Lake Jesup Treatment and Of ite Storage Alte ative
This alternative utilizes the conventional type layout, but places a two million
gallon storage tank and booster pumping system in the Site 16117 area. Site
16/17 is approximately 2.5 riles away from the Lake Jesup site. The treatment
units would remain at Lake Jesup along with high service pumps pumping
directly into the reclaimed grater distribution system. The storage and pumping
facility at ite16/17 would be an off -line system.
Advantages:
1) The plan provides a cost effective treatment facility as there are fearer
expenses for `special features' due to its location. The storage system
would not need to be hidden or disguised.
2 The plan provides the larger storage capacity.
3) Serves the needs of the utility reclaimed water system.
4) At the proposed location the facility does not need to blend in with the
environment. There are no houses or facilities in the area and it can be
screened by natural vegetation.
5) Location of the storage tank and the booster pumping system is at the
midpoint of the reclaimed system and provides a boost to both
systems.
Disadvantages:
1) Controls are required via the SCADA system for the remote operation
of the intake pump station.
2 Increased operational costs due to two locations versus the one site.
3 ) Does not address peak demand requirements.
4) water supply would only be provided when the treatment unit is
operational.
Section 5 - Ar Well
There is are existing artesian well located in the Parkstone subdivision. During
construction of the Parkstone subdivision, an attempt was made to plug this Drell.
This could not be accomplished and the well was piped towards the Lake and is
allowed to flow freely into Lake Jesup. In the Augmentation Consumptive Use
Permit issued by the St. Johns Fiver Water Management District, the City was
granted the right to utilize this artesian well flow to augment the reclaimed water
system. The permit requires that all reuse sources be utilized prior to using the
flow from the artesian well. The well provides a rata of approximately 350 gpm
(0.5 MD).
The water quality of this well is very good and does not exceed/violate any of the
water quality parameters for ` { Public Access" reclaimed grater. It is our belief that
this water can be directly fed into the reclaimed water distribution system.
We recommend the following for the artesian well in Parkstone:
1) Install a submersible wet well pumping system adjacent to the outfall to
take water as needed and to allow flow into Lake Jesup when the system
is not required.
2 Design the lift station to be capable of providing higher pressures for the
reclaimed water distribution system.
3) Design the pump station as a duplex station.
4) connect the lift station directly into the reclaimed water distribution
system.
5) Install a SCADA control system to operate the station remotely as demand
requires or dictates.
6) Follow the guidelines of the Consumptive Use Permit. "The permittee may
use flog from the free- flowing artesian well (District GRS ID 104913), as
described in the permit application, to supplement the reclaimed water
system whenever the demand for reclaimed water exceeds the quantity of
treated wastewater available from the city's waste water treatment
facilities. The free - flowing artesian well may not be pumped or otherwise
used to produce more than its free flowing rate at anytime. The well must
be allowed to flow into Lake Jesup when flow from the well is not being
used to supplement the reclaimed system. ff
Winter Sprin Au Alternatives
Alternative 1 - Conventional La Lake Jesup Site
Units
Quantity
Unit Price
Total
Estimate
1 [ntake structure and lake walk s LS
1
$51,550
$51,550
2 Site Preparation LS
1
$251000
$25,000
---- - - - - --
3 Intake Pipin ( 24-inch ) LF
300
$100
$30,000
4 Drivewa and si d ewal k S F
2500
$8
$20,000
5 Site securit LS
1
$15,000
$15,000
6 Landscape LS
1
$351000
$351000
7 Low service pumpin station at site LS
1
$75,000
$75,000
8 Barscreen - 2 mm maximum size LS
1
$135,000
$135,000
9 Actiflo Treatment Unit - Phase 1 - 1 MGD Flow LS
1
$400,000
$400,000
10 Filtration -FUTURE IF REQUIRED LS
$0
1 1 Stora - Phase 1 - 2 MG Crom Ste LS
1
$7500000
$7501000
12 Hi Sar vice Pumpin - Phase 1; 2 pumps LS
1
$150,000
$150,000
13 SARA Connection LS
1
$45,000
$45,000
14 Wastewater pumpin ( re j ect water LS
1
$45,000
$45,000
15 Reject forcemain - 3 inch LF
350
$23
$8,050
16 Yard Pipin LS
1
$150000
$151000
16 Electrical, chemical and Pump buildin SF
500
$100
$50,000
17 Chemical Stora and Feed E LS
1
$751000
$752000
18 Instrumentation and Controls LS
1
$35,000
$35,000
19 E LS
1 1
1 $105,000
$1057000
.I= Electrical
TOTALS $23064�600
Contin 15% $3091690.00
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $2t374,290.001
Pa 1 of 4
Altemative 2 - Enhanced Environmental La Lake Jesup Site
Units
Quantity
Unit Price
Total
Estimate
1 Intake structure and lake walk s LS
1
$513550
$519550
2 Site Preparation LS
1
$259000
$253000
3 Intake Pipin ( 24-inch ) LF
300
$100
$303000
4 Drivewa and sidewalk SF
2500
$8
$203000
5 Site securit LS
1
$159000
$15X0
6 Landscape LS
1
$25P000
$25,000
7 Low service pumpin station at site LS
1
$75,000
$759000
8 Barscreen - 2 mm maximum size LS
1
$135,000
$1353000
9 Actiflo Unit - Phase 1 - 1 M Flow LS
1
$4003000
$4003000
10 Filtration - FUTURE LS
$0
11 Stora - 250,000 g allon (buried) LS
1
$457,495
$457,495
12 Hi Service Pumpin - Phase 1; 2 pumps LS
1
$150,000
$150X0
13 SCADA Connection LS
1
$45,000
$453000
14 Wastewater pumpin ( re j ect water LS
1
$453000
$453000
15 Re forcemaiin - 3 inch LF
350
$23
$80050
16 Yard Pipin LS
1
$10,00
$10,00
17 Electrical, chemical and Pump buildin SF
500
$100
$50lOOO
11 . S - to - ra g e an - d - Fe - ed Equipment - . - . L - S
Chemical
1
$ - 75300 . 0
$ . 753000
19 Instrumentation and Controls
1
$353000
$353000
_LS
20 Electrical E LS
I 1
1 $105,000
$1053000
OffsltelOfflinn suplemental water suppl station
211 Offsite Stora - 2.0 MG LS
1
$7502000
$7502000
22 Offsite hi service pumpin -exterior LS
1
$877500
$87,500
23 Offsite site preparation L
1
$129500
$12Y500
24 Offsite electrical/instrumentation/SCADA LS
1
$25Y000
$252000
2 B
250
$100
- ---- - --- ---
$25,000
26 Offsite and pipin I LS
1 1
1 $89500
$8,500
TOTALS _V1_6652595
Contin 15% $39%839.25
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $3,065,434.25
Pa 2 of 4
Alternative 3 - offsite Treatment and Stora
Units Qua
Unit Price
Total
Estimate
1 Intake structure and lake walk s
LS 1
$51,550
$51,550
bite Preparation
LS 1
$15,000
$15X000
3 1 nta ke Pipin (24- inch
L F 300
$100
$307000
4 Drivewa and sidewalk
SF 1000
$8
$8,000
5 Site securit
LS 1
$5,000
$5,000
6 Landscape
LS 1
$5,000
$51000
7 Low service pumpin station at site to site 16117
LS 1
$2751000
$275,000
8 Low service raw water main to Site 16/17
L 13500
$85
$111471500
Offs1telOnfine Au s
9
Barscreen - 2 mm maximum size
LS 1
$135J000
$135,000
10
Actiflo Unit - Phase 1 - I IVIGD Flow
LS 1
$400,000
$4001000
11
Filtration -FUTURE
LS
$0
12
Stora - Phase 1 - 2 MG Crom St
LS 1
$750P000
$750,000
13
Hi Service Pumpin - Phase 1; 2 pumps
LS 1
$873500
$87,500
14
SCADA Connection
LS 1
$452000
$46J000
15
Wastewater pumpin (reject water)
LS 1
$452000
$451000
16
Reject , for , c - e . m a - in 3 --- inch nch
..........
..
_LF 1 000
.
$23
$23,000
16
Yard Pipin and offsite site preparation
LS 1
$37500
$377500
17
Electrical chemical and Pump bui Idin
SF 500
$100
$502000
18
Chemical Stora and Feed E
LS 1
$752000
$757000
19
Instrumentation and Controls
LS 1
$35,000
$35,000
20
Electrical E
I LS 1 1
1 $1053000
$1051000
TOTALS $333252050
Contin 15% $498P757.50
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $338233807.501
Pa 3 of 4
Alternative 4 Lake J esup Treatment and Offsite St
Units
Quantity
Unit Price
Total
Estimate
1 Intake structure and lake walk s y st em
LS
1
$51
$51
Site Preparation
LS
1
$25,000
$
Intake Piping (4 -inch)
LF
300
$100
$88,000
4 Driveway and s idewalk
SF
2500
$8
$2
$1 5
5 Site security
LS
1
$15 ; 000
6 Landscape
_ - - - .. - ......_.... - ......_ _.. _._..- -- - - -- - - - -- ..
LS
1
$75,000
-- - -- -
$75,00o
- - -- - --
- - - - -- -- - - -
7 Low service pumping station at site
- - - - - - - - -- -- -- - - - -- - - - -- - -- - - - - -- - -- - - -- - - - - -- - _ _�..
LS
-- - -- - - - - --
1
-- - -- - ....... _...
$75
- -- -- - - -- - -- .. _
$75X0
�._..
_
8 B - 2 mm maximum size
LS
1
$1 35
$1 35
g Actiflo Unit - Phase 1 - 1 I IGD Flew
LS
1
$408 } 008
$400
10 Filtratio - FUTURE
LS
$ 0
12 Pumping and wetwel I - high service
LS
1
$245
$ 245,0og
13 S ADA Connection
LS
1
$45
$45X0
14 Wastewater pumping (reject water)
LS
1
$45,000
$45,0
15 forcernain - inch
LF
850
$3
$8
18 Yard Piping
LS
1
$10
$10
17 Electrical, chemical and Pump building
SF
600
$100
$50
18 Chemical Storage and Feed Equipment
LS
1
$ 75X0
$ 75,000
19 Instrumenta and Controls
LS
1
$ 88,ogg
$35
2 EIectricaI Equip
LS
1
$108,000
$108,000
Offsite Storage
1
Offsite Storage - 2 I I G
LS
1
$ 750, 000
$ 750, 000
-
22
- -- -- - -- - - - - -- -- -- - - -
Offsite high service pumping
- - ... - - - --
LS
- - - --
1
_.. -- -- - -- - - - -- --
$127,000
- - --
- -- - -.... _ ... _ - -- --
$127,000
23
Offsite site preparation
LS
1
$28
$ 8, 000
4
Offsite electrical/instrumentation/controls
LS
1
$125,000
$125,000
5
Offsite Building for pumps and electrical etc.
-
SF
250
$100
$25,000
6
Offsite SC
LS
1
$48, goo
$45, OOO
27
Offsite yard piping
I LS
1 1
1 $17,5001
$17
TOTALS $
Contingency 16% $884,315.00
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $2
LZ
Page 4 of 4
0)
co
o v
cq
qd
00 qt
•
2
0
co 0
0
CN
C
C
r cn
CD
J
-."e
--
J
-
J
C
( 'a
W
0
5
C:�
o
Co 0
00
�•
0
C� C%I
i
0 _
.—�
co (D
LS! 0
c
0
cq
No
0
L- 0
C �
C;
C
CL
O
a)
—
� (D
J
(
J
J
r
CL
E
0
16
d
A
4)
1-
co
m
00
ca
2
c co
~
C
C
LJ.I
cu CL
0
o
w
(7
W
J
CD
E
r
C
m 'gr
Z
APPENDIX E
Environmental Documents and Exhibits
City of Winter Springs Utility 1 Public Works Department
1126 Fast State Read 434
_ - Telephone (40x) 327-6584
E�naH: olfe i4wintt r ran s_
April 19P- 2011
Mahnaz Massoudi
Engineer lv
Florida Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Water & Wastewater Facilities Funding
2600 Blairstone Toad
Tallahassee, Florida, 32399-2400
RE: City of Winter Springs
Lake Jesup Reclaimed Water Augmentation Facility
Environmental Assessment
Dear Mr. Massoudi+
Pursuant to your request, an environmental assessment has b een completed for the above referenced
property. A copy of the report is enclosed.
Should you have any questions or require additional information, please contact one.
Sincerely yours,
Stephanie Wolfe
Water Conservation Coordinator
City of Winter Springs
Authorized Gopher Tortoise Agent
#TA- 1 0 -0008 1 E
I A Certified Aarborist
##FL -5518A
Environmental Assessment
Lake Jesup Reclaimed Water Augmentation Facilit
Winter Springs, Florida
1 L" XI$) Q
On April 11', 2011, Stephanie Wolfe, City of winter Springs water Conservation Coordinator,
conducted an environmental assessment of the location of the proposed Lake Jesup Reclaimed
Water Augmentation Facility (Facility) located north and west of Central winds Park, east of a
residential subdivision, and south of Lake Jesup in Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida.
The assessment was conducted to determine the presence and extent of w etl ands and/or
protected species. A list of Seminole County's protected species was obtained from the U.S
Fish and wildlife Service and is attached (Appendix A).
The proposed Facility will provide an important environmental benefit to the City of winter
Springs and central Florida by reducing the use of groundwater for the purpose of lawn
irrigation, thereby relieving pressure on the Floridan aquifer. Pursuant to the conditions of our
consumptive use permit issued by the St. Johns liver water Management District (CUP 823 8),
Winter Springs must reduce annual groundwater withdrawals over the next 20 years in order to
sustain our groundwater resources. This will be accomplished in part by expanding our
reclaimed water services with the construction of the Facility.
IL SITE DESCRIPTION
A. Site Conditions
The site consists of a. mowed and maintained field located north and west of Central
Winds Park, east of a residential subdivision, and South of Lake Jesup. Previously,
the site was used for agricultural purposes, as a single family residence, and a dog
park. The site is currently vacant.
B. Soils
The Soil Survey of Seminole County, Florida indicates the presence of seven soil
types within the property. A description of each soil type is listed below.
Ba"mer and D2Lay fine sands (a. This soil type is characterized as being nearly
level and poorly drained and is often found in depressional areas. In most years, the
undrained areas of this soil are ponded for 6 to 9 months. if drained, the organic
material shrinks and subsides at a rate of 1 inch per year.
Basinger and Smyrna fine sands, d sessional (11). This soil type is characterized as
being nearly level and poorly drained and is often found in depresSional areas. In
most years, the undrained areas of this sail are ponded for 6 to 9 months.
Eau allie and In mokalee fine sands (13). This soil type is characterized as being
nearly level and poorly drained and is often found on broad plains and flatwoods.
During most years, the seasonal high water table is within 12 inches of the surface
for 1 to 4 months.
Manatee., Floridana4 and Holopaw soils, frequently flooded (1D. This soil type is
characterized as being nearly level and poorly drained and is typically found on flood
plains. In most years, the seasonal high water table is within 12 inches of the surface
for 6-9 months.
M aka and Eau allie fine sands This soil type is characterized as being
nearly level and poorly drained and is often found on broad plains and flatwoods.
During most years, the seasonal high water table is within 12 inches of the surface
for 1 to 4 months.
Fomello fine sand, o to 5 percent slopes (27). This soil type is characterized as being
nearly level and poorly drained and is found in low hammocks and sloughs. In most
years, the seasonal high water table is within 12 inches of the surface for 2-6 months.
S t. Johns and Eauallie fine sands. This soil is characterized as being nearly
level and poorly drained and is found on low broad plains and flatwoods. In most
years, the seasonal high water table is within 12 inches of the surface for 1 -4 months.
The current site conditions do not reflect the condition of the soil as mapped. The
subject property has been used for agricultural purposes since 1 940 and as a single
family hone /recreational site since at least 1984. Site investigations conducted in
April of 2011 did not reveal the presence of hydric soils within the project area..
C. Vegetation
Two land use types occur within the boundaries of the site. These communities were
characterized using the Florida Land Use Cover and Fonm Classification System
(Department of Transportation Surveying and Mapping Geographic Dapping
Section, 1 999) and are described below.
Open Land (FLUCFCS 190 The subject parcel is a mowed and maintained field
located to the north of the dog park and west of the recreational fields of Central
Winds Park. The area was historically used for agricultural purposes and at one time
contained a mobile home. The vegetation consists of Bahia grass (Paspalum.
notatum), ragweed (Ambrosia artemisaifolia), St. Augustine grass (Stenotaphrum
secoradatum ), frog fruit (Phyla nodiflora ), lyre leaf sage (Salvia lyrata), dichondra
(Dichondra sp.), dollar weed (Hydrocotyle sp. }, white clover (Trifolium t - epens), and
lemon bacopa (Bacopa caroliniana).
Lakes (FLUCKS. 52 The shoreline of Lake Jesup forms the northern boundary
of the site. The above listed mix of vegetation extends to the shoreline of the lake.
Bald cypress (Taxodium distichum) is also present along the s The bald
cypress trees will not be impacted during development and will be retained on the
site. Common reed Phragmites aus alis) is growing along the s water ward
of the ordinary high water mark.
III+ V�TTLAND
Aerial photographs from 1984 obtained fr the St. Johns liver water Management
District website, indicate the site conditions have not changed significantly since that time.
In 1984 the site appeared to be a mowed and maintained field with a single family dwelling
in close p roximi ty to the shoreline of Lake Jesup. Historic aerials from 1940, obtained from
the University of Florida Digital Collections website, indicate the property was being used
for the cultivation of food crops. A large ditch nuns along the eastern portion of the site, just
outside of the project boundary, and facilitates drainage of the surrounding areas. The
shoreline of Lake Jesup, a Class III water, is delineated via the ordinary high water mark.
The location of the ordinary high is shown on survey data previously provided by CPH
.Engineers. The shoreline of Lake Jesup is the extent of wetlands and/or surface waters
present within the property boundaries.
Iv- PROTECTED SPECIE
A list of protected species for Seminole County was obtained from the D.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Appendix A). On April 11', 2011 Stephanie Wolfe, authorized gopher
tortoise agent # TA -10 -000 81 B, conducted a survey of the proj area. The investigation
was conducted to determine the presence and/or absence of the gopher tortoise (G opherus
polyphemus) an any other state and/or federally listed wi ldlife species, No gopher tortoises
or evidence of said species were observed. Bald eagles were observed flying over Lake
Jesup during the site investigation, but no bald eagles or other protected bird species were
observed nesting within the property boundaries. No other protected species were observed.
The Florida Fish and wildlife Conservation Commission's FFw CQ bald eagle nest locator
was utilized. The nearest bald eagle nest is appro innately 2,798 feet from the project area.
Pursuant to FFWCC guidelines, activities beyond 660 feet of a nest do not require an eagle
permit.
1YW4)Clow 91110 C11CI
The proposed Facility will provide reclaimed water services to the residents of winter
Springs, thereby reducing the amount of water withdrawn from the aquifer, as rewired by
the SJRWMD. The project area was cleared of vegetation and has been used for agricultural
purposes as early as 1940. The proposed project will have no significant, adverse impacts
on protected species, wetlands, and/or surface waters.
Appendix A
U.S. Fish and Wildlife list of protected species for Seminole County, Florida
'U.S. F is l i & #'MIS } - S
-T Field ice OAF 16- A ortis Florida
OON 1' P, ( i` e. i n � t Y "IT ea o al e r F., t i '1 T L I*r s t e
6 e nu �. I r K. 0
L
This information is provided as a guide to project planning, and is not a substitute for site - specific
surveys. Qneh surveys may he needed to assess species' presence or absence, as well as the extent of
pr ,feet effects on listed species and/or designated critical habitat.
The foll owing table lists those federally rli"sted species known to be present Ux the county.
Code Key: E = Endangered. T = Threatened, P = Proposed, C = Candidate, CH = Critical Habitat
Category
Mammals
Species Common Name Species Scientific Name Code
West Indian (Florida) Manatee Trichechus inarrutus lafirastris E /CH
Florida Scrub jay Aphelocorvra coeruluscens T
Birds
Wood Stork Alycteria arnericrrrza E
Red - cockaded Woodpecker Picnides borealis E
Fish
None
Reptiles
Eastern Indigo Snake Dyrnarchorr corms couper T
Amphibians
None
Mollusks
None
Crustaceans
None
Plants
None
Home pegies: North Florida (�Oui �)N pccies: Sout Floc da _ Ou11 Species: Pa nhandle Count_
For details on State listed species, please go to htt : / /niyfi�,c .coil diiiiperiledspeeip..s//
Sei7d core mer7ts are our web site or general quevtions to NorfIvRorida U &C e
Ifyou reed special assistance please contact the Pub �� � A i�rrs QXice r
Dist inodified Ane 28, 2007
_ ` - k S '' ice. R i, j ig � niI � i r r i rani , r � s Vl I l - f� flf� I' � i riAii r� } %'.' i r �� .- a � a �
l �(��� S. I . S. I - [ �I� �:I�r� } i�.i[ii � ti� . I � � ����� �r4�,j��ts. �� ��y :� � ;� :n�. I'�� ��.4M P ;gin � � r _ � � �4�. � .�dlll�. �:tiL��ld,; �� L� �h>E,.��i�:it�i. s_n��l :�it:�,��.1 �y��- tlx.::
:l�`�. � �� F'�[1i'l I�ti i3l:lllll'il=.� � --T ?ll:':1 LWL. NI A r�}�, �'IL�� , 1`, ]1 C� ily t �' 41tiL 3 ki' i 1t _ f7arada sl'T�1� .�iLl "1'll r �tl''. . �u�`•C411`�. _;;: ii l�iksr:.. �s!::L.,C�11 x��- �,} 1 �Zr , 1 1c1 1Lti �iCl�l� �:, 'kdes s. i ll. L]t,
h is / / w.tx s. ov /northflorida/ ount list /seminole.litin 4/10 /2009
CL 2
CL
!4 Hwy "3 R6
r Lr 0
I L9 ■
ro
s W
_ F W ¢
N Z
F �
• � r W
ON
Te a - •i r +
UF
Jlr
LL
�r
iF y y k Sq 4 b j� 1 rC ra 11
. "rte- l i � � C •
I I � s ., o ��•� � I I�
L p
6 i
W
LL L
t Ik
aZLL
LE
�� FF
�• � - � LL�a � I `� d � � W � 3 W �
. - � L .LL I 4.�1• y � W
Wfit—
• 4 i Q `•�` 9 3 a � � "� �
0v
eg
LU
j 3 0
EL
r I _
11,' I ryF
•3 �aU� ti
_ I d
1 L *' W
1 � I � � �' W •
r •■ F � f .p
I •� g
lip ¢ z =
ti
W
I � r
I
Ic
it
• r .7 -
' e7
r:
` r 11141
7 ' -Pr ►
5 ±�
I �
`
r � •
tip; ` *.
it
1, ,.• . •` rF• R , r � 1
�r
�-
It
?G
771 #
jr
} y
l
f ti
r k ti
I
i�
r
I
mF
•i
a
I w
z
L
p
f r ~
0
F
r
P
A
S
4
12
U
LL
W
F
/1
APPENDIX F
Section 19, Article III — Reclaimed Water System
City of Winter Springs Code of Ordinance
ARTICLE III. RECLAIMED WATER SYSTEM*
*Editor*s note: Ord. No. 443, § 1(1) - - (5) adopted Jan. 9, 1 989, enacted provisions pertaining to the
reclaimed water system. such provisions have been included herein as Art. III, §§ 19- 136 --19 -140, by the
editor.
Cross refere n ees r Wastewater, § 19-26 et seq .
Sec. 19m136. Definitions.
[As used in this article, the following words and terms shall have the meaning ascribed thereto:]
C ustomer: Any person receiving service or raking application for service.
Developer. Any person, firm, association, syndicate, partnership or corporation, or any combination
thereof, who are actually involved in development.
Development: An approved plan utilizing a tract of land appropriately zoned being developed in
accordance with the purposes, intent and provisions of Chapter 9 and Chapter 20 of the City of winter
Springs Code of ordinances.
Irrigation system: From the point of connection to the city's service line valve and extending
through the use of inground sprinkler system(s) to be operated and maintained by the customer.
Potable water: Water that has been treated for human consumption and is distributed to the public
by water distribution mains.
Reclaimed water: Highly treated effluent from the wastewater treatment plant which meets or
exceeds requirements for public access as set forth by the Florida Department of Environmental
Regulation; not for human consumption.
Reclaimed water system. That portion of the system pertaining to storage, pumps, chlorination,
distribution mains, service lines and valves used to distribute reclaimed water.
Tract: All lots or portions thereof served by the particular connection regardless of what portion of
the lot or lots are actually being irrigated.
(Ord. No. 443, § 11(l), 1-9-89)
Sec. 19-137. Routing and construction.
(a) The city will establish a route and install a reclaimed water system based on the most cost
effective method utilizing facilities in existence at the present time. The expansion of which will be
based on an as- needed basis, cost factors, and on the number of applications received from
residents wishing to connect to the reclaimed water system.
(b) Developers of properties which contain or abut such routes shall install reclaimed water
systems in an appropriate easement to be dedicated to the city upon completion. All reclaimed
water systems shall be designed by a Florida registered engineer and in accordance with the
regulations of the city and the State of Florida Department of Environmental Regulation.
(c) The city will operate and maintain the reclaimed water system only. A developer shall design
http : / /Iibrary4.m icode. m /default -test oeVie / 1 019/ 1 / 112/ 115 4/25/2011
and install irrigation systems to maintain common areas, model homes or lots. All such irrigation
systems shall be operated and maintained by the developer, property owners or homeowners
association. No potable water irrigation meters will be installed within an area serviced by a
reclaimed grater system.
(d) Landscape irrigation system requirements. All irrigation systems that are connected to the
reclaimed grater lines shall be inground without over spray to adjacent properties, sidewalks, and
streets. Hose bib connections to the reclaimed grater system will be allowed. It is unlawful to make
connections from the reclaimed grater system to any building or other source of water supply.
Inspections of all irrigation systems installed will be made by utility personnel prior to connection to
the reclaimed water system.
(Ord. Flo. 443, § 1(2), 1 -!9- Ord. No. 2010 -11 � § 4 4- 26-10)
Sec. 19 Fates and charges.
(a) A rate shall be charged to the customers on the reclaimed water system in accordance with the
following schedule:
(1) For nonmetered service for tracts of one -half (112) acre size or smaller, the monthly
charge shall be eight dollars and fifty -five cents ($8.55).
(2) For nonmetered service for tracts greater than one -half { 112} area, an additional
monthly fee of eight dollars and fifty -fire cents ($$.55) for each additional irrigated one -half
( 112) acre shall be added to the base charge of eight dollars and fifty-five cents ($8.55).
(3) For customers receiving metered service, the monthly charge shall be the sum of the
base charge plus a consumptive charge as follows:
Bilk rendered on or
after October 1, 2009
Reclaimed irrigation base facility charge, per ERC. $4.10
Commodity Charge (per 1,000 gallons):
0- -5,000 gallons ... 0.75
5,011 --1 0,000 gallons ... 0.94
10,0011-15,000 gallons ... 1.30
15,001--20,000 gallons ... 1.45
Above 20, gallons ... 2.13
(4) As nonmetered customers of the reclaimed grater system become metered, the newly
metered customer shall be subject to the monthly rates and charges as identified in section
19-13 8(a)(3). Cu shall be subject to charges for metered serv effective the next
available billing period subsequent to installation of the reclaimed water meter.
(5) For wholesale reclaimed water service, the monthly charge shall be fifty -two cents
($0.52) per thousand gallons.
(b) The customer shall not be required to pay all costs associated with the purchase and
installation of the meter. The public workslutility director or their designee may waive the
requirement for a meter where a suitable alternative method exists for the calculation of the water
usage and where the customer agrees to pay the metered rate for the calculated amount of water
usage.
(c) C onnection to the reclaimed water system connection charges. All con to the
http : //11bra 4.municode. coin /default- test/D oc ie /1 01 / 1 / 11 / 11 4/25/20
reclaimed water system shall be approved by the public works /utility director or their designee. The
total connection charge will consist of tapping fee for the reclaimed water service and the fee for
installing a backflow prevention device on each potable water line servicing the same tract.
TABLE INSET:
Nonmetered Service Size (in inches)
Tapping Fee/Plus Material
Backflow prevention fee
Actual cost
314 to 1 112
$230.00
2 to 8
Actual cost
As an incentive to customers within an area of planned reuse expansion, and to allow the city to make as
many taps as possible during construction, all taps for three - quarter -inch or one -inch service will be made
without charge to those customers applying for service prior to the beginning of construction.
(d) A customer whose service has been discontinued may resume reclaimed water service after
paying any past due amounts and a reconnection fee. The reconnection fee shall be equal to the
actual cost of reconnection but in no case shall be less than forty dollars ($40.00).
(e) Where service has been disconnected for a violation of an ordinance or regulation regarding
reclaimed water, such service shall not be reconnected until the city manager receives adequate
assurance and guarantees that such a violation will not recur.
(Ord. No. 443, § 1(3), 1 -9-89; Ord. No. bog, § I, 1 -8 -96; Ord. No. 2002-20, § 5, 6-24-02; Ord. No. 009 -13,
, 9-28-09)
Cross references: Wastewater user charge schedule, § 19 -102.
Sec. 19=139. Promulgation and enforcement of service procedures and regulations.
(a) The city manager shall have the power to promulgate procedures and and regulations with
respect to the following matters which procedures and regulations shall become effective upon
resolution approving same being adopted by city commission:
(1) Application procedures and requirements;
(2) Installation requirements including specifications of acceptable materials, devices and
regulations to help prevent backflow or cross - connection with other systems!
(3) Procedures for the orderly expansion of the reclaimed water system;
(4) Procedures for enforcement of the ordinances and regulations pertaining to reclaimed
water including procedures for inspection of the customers system; and
(b) Procedures and regulations for the efficient operation of the reclaimed water system.
(b) Notwithstanding the foregoing, the city manager may, when necessary for the efficient
operation of the reclaimed water system or for the health or safety of the general public or the
customer, establish regulations regarding the following matters which regulations shall be effective
at the time and regarding:
(1) The time(s) of day or night during which the reclaimed water may be used by
customers; and
(2) The maximum rate of use of the reclaimed water.
(c) No persons shall construct, operate, ,maintain or allow to remain present on property owned or
controlled by hires, any device or system which is connected to the city's reclaimed water system
and which is not in compliance with all provisions of this Code related to reclaimed water and with
htt ,,Hlibra 4.municode. m/default- test/Doc ie /1 01 /l /11 / 115 4/25/2011
all procedures and regulations pursuant to this section. The person who owns or controls the
property upon which such a noncomplying device or system is found shall be liable to the city for
the amount by which the costs associated with the securing and /or the noncomplying device or
system exceeds the cost of a normal discontinuance of service. These excess costs shall constitute
a lien against the property upon which the noncomplying device or system is located.
(d) Any customer whose reclaimed water system is in violation of a city ordinance, regulation, or
procedure shall be subject to immediate discontinuance of reclaimed water service. Such
discontinuance of service shall not relieve any person of liability for civil actions or for criminal or
,municipal ordinance violation prosecution.
(e) No person, unless expressly authorized by the city ,manager or his designee, shall tamper with,
work on, or in any way alter or damage any city reclaimed water facility. Tampering or work shall
include, but is not limited to opening or closing of valves, or causing of any water to flow from the
system. The offending person shall be liable for the cost of all charges attributable to the correction
of such tampering, including legal expenses, but payment of or correction of such damage shall not
relieve the offending person from civil or criminal penalties the city or court of law may impose for a
violation of city ordinance.
(f) Fees for reclaimed water service shall be applied to the customer's monthly water bill. Payment
shall be made in accordance with section 19-97 of the code of ordinances of the City of winter
Springs.
(g) No person shall allow any reclaimed water to be consumed by any human being or animal.
Additionally, no person shall use reclaimed water for any purpose which would knowingly endanger
the health of any person, animal or plant.
(Ord. No. 443, § 1(4), 1 -9 -89)
Sec. 19440. Inspection.
(a) To ensure that the provisions of this article and regulations and procedures are being
observed, the city reserves the right and privilege of inspecting, removing and /or securing any or all
devices installed by the customer which connect to or control the reclaimed water system.
(1) Inspection without cause to believe that an ordinance or regulation is being violated
shall be at reasonable times and shall not exceed a reasonable frequency.
(2) Inspections where there is reasonable cause to believe that an ordinance or regulation
is being violated shall be at such times and shall occur with such frequency as is necessary
to establish that an ordinance or regulation is or is not being violated.
(b) Each customer of reclaimed water shall, by application, give prior written consent to entry upon
his premises, and thereby waives any other written notice for such inspection. Failure of the city to
obtain such a written waiver shell not affect the right of the city to proceed pursuant to subsection
(a) of this section.
(c) Refusing to permit an authorized city agent or employee to enter onto the premises for the
purpose of inspecting the customer's reclaimed water system pursuant to this section shall
constitute a violation of this section and shall be grounds for immediate discontinuance of the
reclaimed water service by the city to the subject premises.
(Ord. No. 443, § 1 (5), 1-9-89)
Secs. 19-141--19-145. Reserved.
http: //Iibrary4.municode.com /default -test/ oe ie / 1 019/ 1 / 11 / 115 4/25/2011
APPENDIX
Project Schedules
r►
�a
3�
O�
a z
�o
Z
4c
M �-
LU
4
3a
° w Z
2a
Ua
aW
w®
)
UA -cc
SG p
M =r
CD
r
R
oc CD r-
N r
0
0
N
a
4
° ° o M
0
° cr ; o r3
N r�
O
Ci
2T
r
O
�3
w
1�� _ _ _ _ I
m m r v o m w Om g r o m M o
°
c fi c;j o 2 C3,
`° N v c� 3 0 v c3 u� c i a`i `v _ r c� ui
N�p7 N r r N ;; a r C 4 r r N r r CV w
[A C� :3 > m n m D r r r L1 fy O N N .- i� -° 9 fD . a 6 r a 7 7 N a C 'C 1
[O fO
C C C t C C C C m m a r 'C r r ` - (D r r r w Lt -c N yD C C C r 'C 'C C t O '- t r C C LL LL t C C
LL M 2 ~~ m m m LL LL LL o m H H m m F >> LL 2 �? LL LL LL F LL H F
cb m m m Q7 Q) p) O7 [J! 4m 0 61 01 07 01 0 01 O1 co 01 W (7) 0 0 o v Q7 W � O O 0 0 o C7 4 o r r r r r r r r r r
° Q e� b o o
0° nl o v n n rn n n u�
Q a c+ o m `o a3 u� u�i co I: is v n w
p R r N [� ^7 r r N N r N r N N m r r
c� `N c o0 0o O D `v d r a r . . r M � v c CD CO
C
c m C m m m m t N 7 C C C C 3 N r r r r r O N r r r m C k LL C N m m ❑ 'C C
° ° ° °° H r o 0 0 m H LL LL d~ g m H H H H LL
� F - � H H F - F � H 2 � � � � r yr y ppf/d� yy fy1� fy1� fN17 3 �yp CCqp yy � qqt�l fy1� fN17 y� ppr�1 pyrl !C��l pp1�� NN
T lO T 7� 7. T T T T T 7. 7L 7+ r T T ]� T 7+ T T T 3� T T T T T T a N 7+ 7. T 7� V. 7.
° a m m m w m m m m m m m m m m W m W m m m m m m m n m tss a m ro eo m W W m m is 16 m W cd m m m m
° m a v v v v a v v a a a a a a 1 - a a a a v a a a a a a a v r a a a a a v a a a a a a a a v a a
Lo O r M 4 O ° "° N Lo O w N 0 4 .0 � N N O m N O Co d 61 � In IC7 4 O N Co LO O Lo O m 0 V " O
M m r N r r N N N N 47 r I'9 N N n O [�7 N N W N c0 N Ln N N
❑ r
° a 4 n o O O O O O ° 0 b O C7 O Ci 0 b 4 ° O O O 0 0 O O O O O a O o o C) 0 O ° O O O C7 O O O O
y O O O O O O ° ° q q q O ° ° 4 C O O v v q 4 O O O ° 4 O O O O O b 4 O O O O O O O O C! q O O O
U 0 0 o a o v ° d ui -d- P o o v v p c o° V) p p c° m o o o c O� o a n 0 o v o 0 o a)
ti9 VV 6R. m � v o) N 69 6% [i3 Vf e9 � Vi 69 69 m V3 ri3 eFi- 69 0 ° o M1 LO a o O 0 0 o Cl O 69 r
N N N N N ac O O O N O CO O CA r 1, Q O O O 00
w 60 W
C 4 1[7 R O O 004, Ql O Ld N Ca O O] N Ld N 69.
G1 r 9 69 � 69 n OD � to E °
G N
M d3 4b% d3 69 69
m w�
I I T I _ N Ii t" In n O C] r N M l[7 n 47 O O V� w �
❑ r I � �� I ��~ �O 5? � 1 �r it Ir I �r rc N N iN� [7 �('�] �(�l I� I� �
r
jl a.
F
cn
E E
m
x
.w
m
E
E
V5
V
w N
0
rn m
m
E?
Q
u pp
Ur
T9 Q
x I
0 1
F 1 1
a c�
F W
E
z 0
p E W i
a
U p C
O
a m
y
F F
0 �° a
o m
U
41
c sn m
a ~ `m
le W
z
CL
N w
z
C3
W U
W
CD cn
LL¢ a
U m n a c m
a s m
y v!
a
Go
c W
� � r U F
w g w
E o C
? G a o
; 3 W o C q
m m o U m
v] D d U°. c.7
H N e2
0. o `-' ° a E� v E
`-° p
cnn n m °� o Z
5
C5 4 F Z m C*] t0
�' L C a o
m W ¢ :7 C d Q
Q W J p
Z C C C d V C to s U
O
_ Iz Q W m
E
r $ C C
G m m
W M E W E
❑ U 7] .-. ❑ ¢_ m
C
, C E C
u � m m q n y o€ o
o 2 LlJ E a a c L7 m o� p v
°� l6 ° O 0.1 O _c CbCD
w .� H w _ E C Z
L7 N N C N f0 i = 7
Z e v p
m a J, 'e c ] c U n W
e o
a
u m Q °�, E °
e a n U
a v
rn ° °i 'E a 0 . Q d m a a
o a U w �; $ Q @
'
2 c -, , a= m n n r J
d m ° C F E W m ° Q.
° rn
m C
r m O1 �
c a L@ a
. m g m Q, T N N m N Q C
m
m y a'
U Q = C E C LL- ° `p v V N y '�• a H U
m Q a N m m m ° m �'
E W° LU o O m �_ 2 m v
m °- m w U v E ° m a
�_ m ro `m w m °'m m
d a s a W ° y .2 W - = Y F
�_ ❑ C v v U m rn m W
° E
1�
F u Y Y' r '� c a G
2 m®
'� � �, a a a W W L d d d a Q
O p
_ ro L °
Y V c. a o m w rn rn X o m m w p
O Q H d
Z Z a J LL U C] k U C7 C7
LL S U I1 m m 0 d w W LLu LL m
z U U VJ V7 I c�a m 2 m w C LL
I I T I _ N Ii t" In n O C] r N M l[7 n 47 O O V� w �
❑ r I � �� I ��~ �O 5? � 1 �r it Ir I �r rc N N iN� [7 �('�] �(�l I� I� �
r
jl a.
F
cn
E E
m
x
.w
m
E
E
V5
V
w N
0
rn m
m
E?
Q
u pp
Ur
T9 Q
f
V O
O
! W
T
- c
@ fi
r2 C j — ,.
............. ...............
LL ........�....... ........_ .. .. .. .. .. .. _., __ .. .. ___
� J
c
W
U
(D
❑ o
0
a m'
o n
z
M
L�7
Q
3
zm
o=
a�
� a
Z N
W
�o
mo
a ca
�z
Wa
a�
IL
W Z
�a
�
W 0
W ii I
7
W
Y
a
J
4 � I
� P7
a
m
Q Q_ 4 Q
4 Q Q O O ` r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r
c�
CD u c� o n C 8 as a5 o 0 `I• `m `m a`o ua ao i rn - .2; v a�i is ca u�i rn co ti v u7 00 0 0
C C
C C . . . r -O m r r r m m m 'C LL 7 C D D 'c '� '� m O C O m m D D LL C
r C 7 @ .- O o .- ' .
L 'O L m m LL m . . 7 LL 7 LL LL t LL m m � = m 7 C O 3 LL � 2 m LL LL
[A [A O N W CA ❑) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O _ _ N _ N_ N_ _ N _
0 0 �a r� m chi �Y$ is ca o ti ca w w Y .= a 'n_ i c� m o rD m ji jE n i_ a s
[ry M C] 12 CA Q) N Q N ryi h r 4. N ;I N _ r r N [r] IS'7 r 00 W OO N O1 N O1 r - `O r r r N
[�J [�J [� CD m - a a0 O O O) O N 1! 11 I Ill IL �1 a� r- r L�1 N R R
- Q r r r r r c c m m m m m a
7 LL 7 m U- LL lL lL lL lL L L H D LL D D C m C N O O O 3 7 j H H H C H (` 1- W m w w @ 0 0 LL LL L LL F
ti
7. 7. T m m m T m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m T
�aaaa aaaaaa'a 'a , a ,a'a'aaaaaa'a aaaa a,aavvvvva ,z avv O avaaavv`
O C�'] O m CD COr) - N W � P, N N N CO h N 4 O Q O m N N m C] N C O z 4 N N O
r r r r r r r r v r N N r r
1
O O O O O O O O pp O 4 4 O 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 O O Q O 4 4 4 4 O O O O 4 4 4 O 4 v O O O O O O O O G
0 0 0 0 0 0 Iri co co ni a 0 0 0 o c o C. o a o 0 0 0 o M W) 0 c r Oct rtr w w as ae �n ov m rn7 r .. 8 o o v v 0 o v v N 8 n C a a N q " � n
.= r, - Cl) a 10 0 o ti CM o 0 o M o W) o CD 0 0 0 Co N� It CP IBS
C7 W e9 C7 M N9 N 4 r r M O O V) P.- 6) O O O O
CO r pp
e4 63 EA fl9 rft eFt tp, V)
E9 d9 d3 V3 EH d4 69 E9 69 E9 a l
I K
C
m
E f I m Cl
0 LU I
Z Qr [C6 w I
U L7 m m ?
UP Z G o c� c'• CL W 0 O �,] c C r2
IL O O O W Q v Q n
M aG [A t7 V •C m m m '� v E
IL H U-
L L ¢ n F N O m
a d
T � O 0 O D D 15 V F
wzz L) H LL m 3 o m E 0 U
O D .2 ° o ° e- .n , O o v D y 5 `m a o z
Q w 2 • A 0 m c v D
L t7 m c 2 2 m Q a � 't= = n k c 0 a a n. a - E � v� m r U V
@ m m I
a E Z E a E a a c CL ao h m s E E m° 0 0 z
`o c U
W c LL o LD E w E w E oL c [a li i; d m a Y w a d) C � ° to 's N o a s
Ij m Q ILL p n rn U °m rn� °m rn� w '� IL n a 6 a� Q o p E r n C9 � W Y Q � m e c a�� c�
D 3: x 0 v v a v @ m `m o v m a v 7 H a� v) E m L m m E n @ a CID m v ° v cx 3 m 3 + �� — n °1 c N C c c m LL— u U m c
m Q C CO C C m C C m C .@. a UJ 67 � w m 1 •� � Q [ W C @ 7 Ol a N D
IL DO d z c @ w W sA C m w a m m_ �v x 1° c) - E � c_v � a d E 0
D Y = N O O N p • tl] D @ �_' @ 7 m C C C C LL C O W V Q U m C Q1 r m ❑ V U
CD r a v N G m m ® a) W U @ 6 @ € m O a C m E E Z W @ LL @ 0 O D-
E W o 4 H❑ t v ❑ is '� ❑ v '� m m m m m m� �Qa� ~ @ m Ix N m Q �l] a m w w m m ?s sa m U
z V m y w �_ m y 2 m d w a ❑ L 3 tl7 1) ❑ c $ c c) g 9 E E E 2 W
Y ca m Y r O c '� a a, i� c �, n n o W W W d d a m a a `-' a o m m LL" =° 'c 'e c aii 0 m m m O
W D a Q s� J W m o �' @ D @ D ❑ ❑❑ CC C v J p pp D L W Q Q m ca o
f- a LL LL U LL U LL C7 U U U U IL a a N LL LL LL W W W LL m m a z C] V1 05 to ti CJ d C& G Z d W w U C Q' � V} LL d
z Z
a _�_ `7`I'' � _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -- III• _ _ _ _ _!
d N '7 V � L') m 1� CO t7) O I N M l[1 [C 1� CO Q) O - In �1N N N N N N •N N N cn cn a7 Cc'� [' I 1 1
Q
n
Y
w
N
� m
to s
G G
m m
L W
i�
z
m
E
E
N a
w C
m D
a
m
❑ r
3�
>r �
3a
ao
CD
0
° c
a o
0
v v °�
ui
° o C2 a c c °
a ,
to
m
o �
ni CD I
C! °
0
r-
w
cn
T T
w'
9
4 kj
1i
I
v.
c�
3-
o�
U
a� W
Z
w p
CiD
LU
V
Q
as �_
0
0
J
_ J
Q W
U Z I'
a� 2 I I
w
ca
UJ I !
�a �I
w
g m I
LL
N ea 8 4 iz� Q]
r •$ 7 N n�j a N � N N N N N N N N c�7 cq cr] r Y Y p r N N
Ma cn cri `o r c� c� r Yy c� u� ° o y o n n n h n c0 6a Y �a 0 ca r p Ca
•� �
O W O r r r r r r r r r r N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N k
� � Q Y .•- .- cl+ L� cl � 7 � '+� m m v r v v N a M1 c`a .❑ rn rn n o 0
C C m C C C r v 3 'C M M 'D 3 3 m R m m m m m m m 7 7 3 m 3 r r
❑ ❑ 7 C C V 4p 7 a a r LL F" N N h H '$ 3 '$ '$ 7 7 7 L t t 3 t
C co '° R R R R R R R R a R R R R R R R R R R R R R m R W W W W W W R R t0 [O
°
a r
4 [7 4 O N — N O O O ate N n N O O7 co cG 47 N ID CD LO N N N M — 'C Q N
O O 4 N O
07 I r r � r r � r q r
O O Q O O O O O O O O O O O Q O O O O b b Q O O O O 4 4 4 Q Q O
lip O O O O O O O O O O Q Q O O O O O Q Q Q O Q O Q O O O O Q O Q Q
CI CI CI p p p p p p N p p p p p p N p p p p ari p p p p p p p 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0
6%
�! N9 fR fA `C n GA U3 H
E9 3 6% 6% N4 4% a fa W3- fH 6% N O ° v ° ° Q ° Q ° Q ° o "' ° a Q Q O O C
a
x
N
w m
E E
u� u�
E
E
o
u
C
m
E
w m
m P
O m
d
c
LU _ a
cr
LL) a
N
R
O c
m
s C N
~ ' C a ll Q w U d [] 7 7 w
m
Z � LL a a s
0
�n Q c U
vs
ti- d LU a CO 0 v
€ iu ED tl3i — m
ca V
iu m
-'' D ° 3° ° a a W E ❑' c o a
E w
w r
40 F _ _
C 3 ) 4) /D 0a Q C d = C C -0
V
m =
H V7
.�. Q N
00 uzj
1.- L C C .'.' C ¢ W E - "fA pp Q E ,`�
M
~ C Z
aT m m m O E C n y E p C « p
w of a a m° E` E a m v m s m o n U a W
v ° @ °a' a ¢ d a E- rn' cn 2 c C :? Oa �
tl W a s m Q m e ' w c 3 C N ° E
C C C m C 1!J ❑ ❑ O
= V _ d E E o
W o
F v ',
4
E d 'L, H Z n o ° m ° - m a is m ti M a v a .3 m M >> w
R W p Y S •a L7 [�7 •� ❑ ] •S m N D 4 w m m
H a m 3 3❑ r '� W ❑ x E �? ¢
Q c '—`
R R V
m W
Z V m m p
Y F v m W H= �_, 'v te a, a w w w m LL a = c i7 o a LL Y n 2 ¢
Q R O ❑ Q C v v_ Q O o '� r .�_ W ig p E N m U
,
c m Q
p N C
i1 r
H Z 0. Q VJ li LL U m (0 co d ❑ S d S W 0
J� U U U U d LL LL LL ll m m Q Z
U 1 iz a
�
I i I II I I O Y N CO O7 O N O fti I 47 �D 1� ii7 M I Q1 N
I �T I N N IN I� �c*] IN IN N -N I n7 �N rN Ie')[�
C] l I I� �� I� I I I I I
1;
M `l I 09 a0 CO
I['] �c`7 co I
m
a
APPENDIX H
Public bleating and Authorizing Resolution Documentation
APPENDIX I
Permits -- Florida Department of Environmental Protection
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONNffiNTAL PROTECTION
Sent via email: klockcuff @winterspringsfl.org
In the Matter of an
Application for Pennit by:
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
1126 E STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS FL 32708
ATTENTION LIPTON LOCKCUFF PE
PUBLIC WORKSMILITY DIRECTOR
INTENT TO ISSUE
Seminole County - D
Winter Springs West WWTF
Wastewater Permit Application
DEP File No.:FLAO 11067 -023 -DWI P
The Department of Environmental Protection gives notice of its intent to issue a permit revision (copy of
conditions attached) for the proposed project as detailed in the application specified above, for the reasons stated
below.
The applicant, City of Winter Springs, applied on October 11, 2010 to the Department of Environmental
Protection for a permit revision to supplement the existing Winter Springs West reuse system using surface water
from Lake Jesup. The proposed project will require construction/installation of 16 inch HDPE intake pipes, influent
pumping station, two stage filter system, 240,000 gallon storage tank, backwash pump station, chlorine storage tank
and chlorine transfer pumps, and high service pumps for the transfer of the supplemental supply to the reclaimed
water distribution system. The Lake Jesup Augmentation facility will be located at 900 E. State Rd 434, Winter
Springs, Seminole County, Florida 32708.
The Department has permitting jurisdiction under Section 403.087 and 403.0885 Florida Statues (F.S.), and
Chapters 62 -4 and 62 -620, Floridan Administrative Code (F.A.C.). The project is not exempt from permitting
procedures. The Department has determined that a wastewater permit revision is rewired for the proposed work.
Under section 403.815 of the Florida Statutes and Rule 62-103.150 of the Florida Administrative Code, you
(the applicant) are rewired to publish at your own expense the enclosed Notice of Intent to Issue Permit. The notice
must be published one time only within 30 days in the legal ad section of a newspaper of general circulation in the
area affected. For the purpose of this - rule, "publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the area affected'
means publication in a newspaper meeting the requirements of sections 50.011 and 50.031 of the Florida Statues, in
the county where the activity is to take plane. Where there is more than one newspaper of general circulation in the
county, the newspaper used should be one with significant circulation in the area that may be affected by the permit.
If you are uncertain that a newspaper meets these requirements, please contact the Department at the address or
telephone number listed below. The applicant must provide proof of publication to the Department, at 3319
Maguire Boulevard, Suite 232, Orlando, Florida 32803 within seven days of publication. Failure to publish the
notice and provide proof of publication within the allotted time may result in the denial of the permit.
The Department will issue the permit with the attached conditions unless a timely petition for an admini strative
hearing is filed under sections 120.569 and 120.57 of the Florida Statutes before the deadline for filing a petition.
The procedures for petitioning for a hearing are set forth below.
A person whose substantial interests are affected by the Department's proposed permitting decision may
petition for an administrative proceeding (hearing) under sections 120.569 and 1 20.57 of the Florida Statutes. The
petition must contain the information set forth below and must be filed (received by the clerk) in the Office of
General Counsel of the Department at 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Mail Station 35, Tallahassee, Florida
32399 -3000.
Petitions by the applicant cr any of the parties listed below mint be filed within fourteen days of receipt of this
written notice. Petitions filed by any persons other than those entitled to written notice under section 120.60(3) of
the Florida Statutes must be filed within fourteen days of publication of the notice or within fourteen days of receipt
of the written notice, whichever occurs first.
Under section 1 20.60(3) of the Florida Statutes, however, any person who has asked the Department for notice
of agency action may file a petition within fourteen days of receipt of such notice, regardless of the date of
publication.
The petitioner shall mail a copy of the petition to the applicant at the address indicated above at the time of
filing. The failure of any person to file a petition within the appropriate time period shall constitute a waiver of that
person's right to request an administrative determination (hearing) under sections 120.569 and 1 20.5 7 of the Florida,
Statutes. Any subsequent intervention (in a proceeding initiated by another party) will be only at the discretion of
the presiding officer upon the filing of a motion in compliance with rule 28- 106.205 of the Florida Administrative
Code.
A petition that disputes the material facts on which the Department's action is based must contain the
following information;
(a) The name, address, and telephone number of each petitioner; the name, address, and telephone number of
the petitioner's representative, if any; the Department permit identification number and the county in which the
subject matter or activity is located;
(b) A statement of how and when each petitioner received notice of the Department action;
(c) A statement of how each petitioner's substantial interests are affected by the Department action;
(d) A statement of all disputed issues of material fact. If there are none, the petition must so indicate;
(e) A statement of facts that the petitioner contends warrant reversal or modification of the Department action;
(f) A concise statement of the ultimate facts alleged, as well as the rules and statutes which entitle the
petitioner to relief; and
(g) A statement of the relief sought by the petitioner, stating precisely the action that the petitioner wants the
Department to take.
A petition that does not dispute the material facts on which the Department's action is based shall state that no
such facts are in dispute and otherwise shall contain the same information as set forth above, as required by rule 2S-
106.301.
Because the administrative hearing process is designed to formulate final agency action, the filing of a petition
means that the Department's final action may be different from the position taken by it in this notice. Persons
whose substantial interests will be affected by any such final decision of the Department have the right to petition to
become a party to the proceeding, in accordance with the requirements set forth above.
Mediation under section 120.573 3 of the Floridan Statutes is not available for this proceeding.
Executed in Orlando, Florida.
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT
OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
i *'4
1 stianne C. Ferra,r
Progrmn Administrator
Water Facilities
3319 Maguire Boulevard, Suite 232
Orlando, Florida 32803-3767
Phone: (407) 894-7555
Date: April 1 3, 2011
Filed, on this date, pursuant to Section 120,52,
F.S., with the designated Department Clerk,
receipt of which is hereby acknowledged.
Ap ril 13, 2011
Clerk Date
C F /mcc /&ply
Enclosures: Draft Permit Revision
Notice of Intent
Copies furnished to:
William C. toucher, P. E. (via email: bgoucher @cphengincers.com)
Groundwater Section (via email)
Wastewater C & E Section (via email)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that this INTENT T d all copies were mailed by close of business on Apr:113. 2011,
the listed persons, by
r
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF EI TVIRONMIENTAL PROTECTION
NOTICE OF INTENT TO ISSUE PERMIT
The Department of Environmental Protection gives notice of its intent to issue a permit revision to City of
Winter Springs (11 26 E. State Road 434, winter Springs, FL 32708) to augment the existing winter Springs west
reuse systern using surface water from Lake Jesup. The proposed project will rewire construction/installation of
treatment to provide high -level disinfection and pumping to the reclaimed water distribution system. The Like
Jesup Augmentation Facility will be located at goo E. State Rd 434 winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida
32708. The Department has considered the effects of reclaimed water discharged to groundwater and has assigned
File Number FLA011067- 023 -Dw 1P to the project.
The Department will issue the permit with the attached conditions unless a timely petition for an administrative
hearing is filed under sections 120.569 and 120.57 of the Florida. Statutes before the deadline for filing a petition.
The procedures for petitioning for a hearing are set forth below.
A person whose substantial interests are affected by the Department's proposed permitting decision may
petition for an administrative proceeding (hearing) under sections 120.569 and 120.57 of the Florida Statutes. The
petition must contain the information set forth below and must be filed (received by the clerk) in the Office of
General Counsel of the Department at 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Mail Station 35, Tallahassee, Florida
32399-3000,
Petitions by the applicant or any of the parties listed below must be filed within fourteen days of receipt of this
written notice. Petitions filed by any persons other than those entitled to written notice under section 120,60(3) of
the Florida Statutes must be filed within fourteen days of publication of the notice or within fourteen days of receipt
of the written notice, whichever occurs first.
Under section 120.60(3) of the Florida Statutes, however, any person who has asked the Department for notice
of agency action may file a petition within fourteen days of receipt of such notice, regardless of the date of
publication.
The petitioner shall mail a copy of the petition to the applicant at the address indicated above at the time of
fling. The failure of any person to file a petition within the appropriate time period shall constitute a waiver of that
persons right to request an administrative determination (hearing) under sections 120.569 and 120.57 of the Florida
Statutes. Any subsequent intervention (in a proceeding initiated by another party) will be only at the discretion of
the presiding officer upon the filing of a motion in compliance with rule 28- 106.205 of the Florida Administrative
Cade.
A petition that disputes the material facts on which the Department's action is based must contain the following
information:
(a) The name, address, and telephone number of each petitioner; the name, address, and telephone number of the
petitioner's representative, if any; the Department permit identification number and the county in which the
subject matter or activity is located;
(b) A statement of how and when each petitioner received notice of the Department action;
(c) A statement of how each petitionees substantial interests are affected by the Department action}
(d) A statement of all disputed issues of material fact. If there are none, the petition must so indicate;
(e) A statement of facts that the petitioner contends warrant reversal or modification of the Department action;
(f) A concise statement of the ultimate facts alleged, as well as the rules and statutes which entitle the petitioner to
relief; and
(g) A statement of the relief sought by the petitioner, stating precisely the action that the petitioner wants the
Department to tape.
A petition that does not dispute the material facts on which the Department's action is based shall state that no
such facts are in dispute and otherwise shall contain the same information as set forth above, as required by rule 28-
106.301.
Because the administrative hearing process is designed to formulate final agency action, the filing of a petition
means that the Department's final action may be different from the position taken by it in this notice. Persons
whose substantial interests will be affected by any such final decision of the Department have the right to petition to
become a panty to the proceeding, in accordance with the requirements set forth above.
Mediation under section 120.573 of the Florida Statutes is not available for this proceeding.
The application is available for public inspection during normal business hours, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except legal holidays, at the Central District Office of the Department of Environmental Protection,
3319 Maguire Boulevard, Suite 232, Orlando, FL.
�SOLUTION NUM$� �011-1$
A RESOLUTION OF THE CI'TY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER
SPRINGS, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE STATE REVOLVING FUND LOAN
PROGRAM; MAKING FINDINGS; AUTHORIZING THE LOAN
APPLICATION; ALJTHORIZING THE LOAN AGREEMENT; ESTABLISHING
PLEDGED REVENUES; DESIGNATING AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES;
PROVIDING ASSURANCE; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY,
AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
II HEREAS, Florida Stahztes provide for loatis to local government agencies to finance the coilstruction of
water pollurion control tacilities; and
WHEREAS, Florida Adillinistrati�re Code niles require autliorizatio�i to apply tor loans, to establish pledged
revenues, to designate an authorized representative; to provide assurances of compliance with loan program
requirernents; atld to enter into a loan agreetnent; and
WHEREAS, the City Conunission accepts the findings of the Reclaimed Water Augmentation F'roject
SU�J�J1eItlelltcll P17T1Y11T1g DOCUTlleIlt 1S 12t12riCIeC� ApT'lI Z9� 201 1� 7Y1C�
WHEREAS, the City Cotnmission previously approved a Water & Wastewater Rate Study that projected the
revenues needed to constriict the Lake Jesup Reclaitned ��Vater Augmentation Froject;
WHEREAS, tlie City Coritmission approved Ordinance 2009-13 which itnplemented the rate iilcreases
necessary to support the atiticipated capital financing debt paytnents associated with the Lake Jesup Reclaicned Water
Froject; arld
WHEREAS, tlie State Re��olving Loan Fu1id loan priority list designates Froject No. WW59060 Lake Jesup
Reclaimed Water Augmentarioci Froject as eligible ior available funding; and
WHEREAS, the City of Winter Springs intends to enter into a loan agreement with the Department or'
Etivirorii�ieiltal Protection tulder the State Revolving Fui1d for project financing.
NO�'�' THEREFORE� $E IT RESOLVED by the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs,
Flot•ida as follows:
SECI'ION I—'I'�le toregoing findings are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereot.
SECTION II — Tlle Ciry of Winter Spritigs, Florida is autliorized to apply for a loail to iinance the Project.
SECTION III — Tl�e reventies pledged for tlle repayment of tlie loan are net ���ater and sewer utility systetn
revennes aiter pay�nent oi debt service oti tlie Ciry's outstanding VVater and Sewer Bonds.
SECTION N— The �'��ayor is hereby designated as the authorized representative to provide the assurances
and committnents required by the loan application.
SECTION V— The �Vlayor is tiereby designated as the authorized representative to execute the loati
agreement ���iich will become a binding obligarion in accordance with its terrns when signed by both parties.
'I'�le Mayor is authorized to represent the Cit}� in carrying out the City's responsibilities under the loan
agreement. The �'�'Iayor is authorized to delegate responsibility to appropriate City stafi to carryout technical,
finaricial, and admiilistrative activities associated with tlle loan agreetnent.
SECTION VI — The legal authority for borrowing moneys to construct this Froject is Florida Statutes.
SECTION VII — Cont7icts. All resolutions or part of Kesolutions in conflict with any of the provisions of this
Resolution are herby repealed.
SECTION VIII — Severabilitv. Ir atly Sectioii or portion ot this Resolution proves to be invalid, unlawful, or
unconstihrtional, it shall not be held to invalidate or impair the validiry, force, or etfect ot any Secrion or part of
this Resolution.
SEC'TION IX — Erfective Dates. This Resolution shall becotne effective itnrnediately upon its passage and
adoption.
�ASSED :�ND �DOPTED BY THE CITY C0IVLVIISSION OF THE CITY OF
WI;vTER SFRINGS, FLORID�1, I:V A REGULAR MEETING ASSEMBLED ON THE 9th
DA1' OF .��11', 2011.
.�i ii�i/i�P.r; m��r��/ ��/r�ii�f� /r�y��,�iil<< �' ��iy /rcui�liiir�l ��u���/
/��: :��i�li� f� <�f.t�<�_. .
�� � %:�� �
CHARI,,ES LACE , . � •
ATTES� . `�
V` �
C C
DATE: MAY 9, 2011