Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010 06 28 Regular 606 Request For Concept Approval for Two Story Charter School on 8.7 Acres Within The Town Center CITY COMMISSION AGENDA Consent Informational ITEM 606 Public Hearing Regular X COV June 28, 2010 Meeting Mgr. / Dept/ Authorization REQUEST: The Community Development Department requests the Commission consider the request to grant concept approval of a proposed 50,000 square foot (SF) 2 -story charter school on an 8.7 acre crescent shaped site within the Town Center, subject to conditions. SYNOPSIS: Section 20 -323 (a) of the City Code lists schools as a permitted use within the Town Center. Section 20 -324 (9) of the City Code provides for the designation of certain sites having special public importance to be designated as "civic sites (item 602, last week). The first stage (of 2 stages) in a special exception for a building footprint larger than 20,000 SF is being considered, as a separate agenda item. This is the conceptual site plan approval. The goal is to approve the conceptual site plan, subject to conditions, along with the first stage of the special exception, at this meeting. Then, at the next meeting, the Commission could consider the final stage of the special exception and a development agreement to provide both the applicant and the City the assurances both need to proceed. CONSIDERATIONS: LAND USE, ZONING DESIGNATION, ETC.: Zoning: Town Center Future Land Use Designation: Town Center APPLICABLE REGULATION: Florida Statutes Comprehensive Plan City Code June 28, 2010 Regular Item 606 Page 2 BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The vegetated 8.7 acre site is strategically located along the north side of SR 434, at the western- most terminus of the Town Center, where two (2) important [visual] terminating vistas along SR 434 meet. It is also bounded by the Cross Seminole Trail, Central Winds Park, the Hound Ground Park, and the high school. Across SR 434 is Heritage Park. The applicant is doing "due diligence" to purchase the site for a 50,000 S.F., 2 -story, charter elementary school for approximately 450 - 650 students (to relocate the existing Choices in Learning Elementary School from Longwood; most students are projected to live within 6 miles). The famous planner, Clarence Perry, known as the "father of the neighborhood unit," considered the ideal neighborhood to be located around an elementary school. Children from Heritage Park, Jesup's Reserve, Avery Park, Parkstone, Winding Hollow, Stone Gable, and the homes along Orange Avenue would be within biking, or in some cases walking, distance of the school. Artesian Park and Jesup's Landing, when they develop, would also be within easy biking and walking distance. The site is subject to the Town Center provisions of the comprehensive plan (Future Land Use Element) and the Town Center Code (sections 20 -320 thru 20 -327 of the City Code). Section 163.3194, Florida Statutes, requires any development approved or undertaken by a local government to be consistent with the comprehensive plan (i.e. no waivers are allowed from the comp plan requirements). Staff believes, however, that state law may exempt public schools from aesthetic and building requirements, unless agreed to in a legal document, such as a development agreement. Pertinent Town Center issues include, but are not limited to ensuring the provision of prominent public architecture at the terminating vistas (from both east and west, as well as from the intersection of the trail and Central Winds Parkway - primarily the view from east -bound SR 434), designing the site (as well as the building) to project properly onto SR 434, and the interaction between a school on this site with the adjacent trail and park. The site has readily accessible City water and sanitary sewer service. There is a 6 inch sanitary force main and a 12 inch potable water main in the adjacent Central Winds Parkway, east of the site. Development topics for a concept review (and the subsequent development agreement), include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: • potential re- alignment of Central Winds Parkway and the park entrance; • adjacent on- street parking (which may involve providing additional right -of -way); • minimizing on -site parking and stacking (and the view from SR 434); • site orientation toward the park and the trail; • proper signage (concept plan depicts ground signage, which would require a special exception); • adequate sidewalks, cross - walks, and pedestrian access; • retention pond requirements and options; • fencing, security, and pedestrian access into the site; • existing specimen trees; • aesthetic Town Center architecture controls; June 28, 2010 Regular Item 606 Page 3 • waiving the frontage road along SR 434; and • joint use of facilities. The only area of apparent disagreement between staff and the applicant, at this stage of review, regards provision of right -of -way and on- street parking along the east side of the site (to create a Town Center Street, as set forth in Section 20 -325 (C) (10) of the City Code). The attached memo from Dover Kohl and Partners addresses provision of on- street parking at elementary schools. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REQUIREMENTS: Future Land Use Element: The following goals, objectives, and policies from the Future Land Use Element of the City's comprehensive plan are most pertinent to development of this site as a school: Objective 1.11 Public Schools. The City shall implement standards for the siting of public schools to increase the quality of life and local educational opportunities for its citizens. Goal 2. Town Center. The City seeks to create a Town Center based upon traditional design standards for development that will become the identifying focus of the City's downtown and contribute to an increased and diversified tax base for the City. The primary purpose of the Town Center shall be to create an economically successful, vibrant, aesthetic, compact, multimodal, diverse, mixed use (including horizontal and vertical integration of uses) neo- traditional urban environment, designed on a pedestrian scale and with a pedestrian orientation. The Town Center is to be a place where people can reside in a mix of single and multiple family dwellings, work, gather to shop, relax, recreate, be entertained, attend community events, and enjoy the natural beauty of lands located in the Town Center. The Town Center should be created through public and private investment and development. Policy 2.2.1: Neo- Traditional Characteristics. Encourage a mixed use higher density /intensity neo- traditional Town Center, utilizing, to the extent practical, the fundamentals and urban design concepts in the Town Center Master Plan: • Urban and high density • Walkable_community • Predictability in design/flexibility in land uses. • Visibly different section of S.R. 434 • Important sites for special public places • "Green network" of parks and preserved open spaces • Connected network of streets and blocks • Special public spaces of defined character • Special sites for civic buildings • Pedestrian sized blocks Nongated developments Policy 2.2.2: Variety of Places. Promote and permit a variety of places to gather, shop, relax, recreate and enjoy the natural beauty of the Town Center. Choose sites for public spaces because of their uniqueness or existing physical features. June 28, 2010 Regular Item 606 Page 4 Policy 2.2.4: Mixed Uses. Permit a variety of mixed uses consistent, compatible, and in harmony with the Town Center Goal, including single family residential, multiple family residential, commercial retail and services, public services and buildings, parks, and schools, through the enactment of creative and flexible land development regulations. Policy 2.3.6: High Quality Development. Ensure high - quality building and development that enhances the image and economic well -being of the City and the Town Center. Policy 5.2.3: Public Areas within the Town Center. Incorporate pedestrian nodes, such as plazas, parks, squares, gardens, courtyards, or other public green space areas. Policy 5.2.6: Pedestrian- Friendly Site Design. Promote pedestrian gathering and circulation by requiring all of the following: • Safe and convenient pedestrian connection to commercial shop fronts from rear parking areas. Connection might be by public sidewalk or through plazas, courtyards, vias, or corridors; • Transit stops which are well connected to pedestrian circulation systems and include shelter from the elements and sitting areas; • Sidewalks that are a minimum of 12' wide along in front of commercial shop fronts and are a minimum of 6' wide in all other areas; • Provisions for immediate shade along streets by inclusion of larger caliper shade trees, expanded awnings or colonnades for commercial shop fronts, and/or other means; • Pedestrian lighting and subdued night lighting of display windows and building interiors along street frontages; • Room -sized areas of occupiable space (as defined in Florida Building Code, Chapter 2) along street frontages in commercial shop fronts with entrances at the same grade as the sidewalk; and • Streetscape design as set forth in the Town Center District Code. Policy 5.2.7: General Design of Individual Developments within the Urban Central Business District. Require all development within the UCBD to comply with the Town Center Goal and Town Center District Code. Require development to include diversity in detailing and style while maintaining aesthetic harmony and buildings to include at least two stories. Ancillary buildings may be excluded from the two story minimum by action of the City Commission. Public Schools Facilities Element: The following pertinent goal and policies are located within the City's Public School Facilities Element of the comprehensive plan: Policy 1.6.2: Co- Location and Community Focal Point. Encourage to the extent feasible, the co- location of new school sites with appropriate City facilities, recognizing that new schools are an essential component in creating a sense of community. Encourage, through the development review process, the location of new school sites so they may serve as community focal points. Enter into an interlocal agreement with the School Board where co- location takes place, to address shared uses of facilities, maintenance costs, vehicular and bicycle parking, supervision and liability issues, among other concerns. June 28, 2010 Regular Item 606 Page 5 GOAL 1: Provide Quality Education. As a basic tenet of community life, it is the goal of the City to contribute to and maintain a high quality public school environment. Objective 1.6: Ensuring Compatibility with Surrounding Land Uses, Encouraging Co- location with Appropriate City Facilities, Location in Proximity to Residential Areas to be Served and Function as a Community Focal Point. The City shall ensure compatibility of school facilities with surrounding land use through the development review process and shall encourage, to the extent feasible, co- location of new schools with compatible City facilities, and the location of school facilities to serve as community focal points. Policy 1.7.1: Maximizing Efficiency of Infrastructure. Seek to maximize efficient use of existing infrastructure and avoid sprawl development by identifying future school sites that take advantage of existing and planned roads, potable water, sanitary sewer, parks, and drainage systems, during participation in the future school site identification process detailed in the 2007 ILA. Policy 1.3.2: Site Sizes and Co- location in the City. Work with the School District to identify sites for future educational facilities that meet the minimum standards of the School Board where possible and which are consistent with the provisions of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Support the School Board in efforts to use standards more appropriate to a built urban environment, when the size of available sites does not meet the minimum School Board standards. Work with the School Board to achieve co- location of schools with City facilities, to the extent feasible, as a solution to the problem of lack of sufficiently sized sites. Recreation & Open Space Element: The following supporting policy is from the Recreation and Open Space Element of the City's comprehensive plan: Policy 1.7.3: Continue coordination with the Seminole County School Board, to allow the use of school board facilities by the general public. Parks and schools shall be collocated to the extent possible to optimize the shared use of facilities. (Cross Reference: See Future Land Use Element, Policy 1.11.9) Fiscal Impact Objective & Policies: The following comprehensive plan, Future Land Use Element, objective and policies address the fiscal impact of a development: Policy 2.1.3: Promote and Protect. Maintain a leadership position to protect the economic and planning integrity of the Town Center and promote public and private investment and growth therein. Objective 2.3 Economic Development. Plan and promote sufficient economic growth and development that provides for an appropriate balance of high - quality land uses, development and activities that will provide a sound financial future for the City. Policy 2.3.3: Optimization of Tax Base. Ensure compatible land uses and development projects within the Town Center that optimally increase and diversify the City's tax base and economic well- being, while complementing and protecting established surrounding neighborhoods. Policy 2.3.4: Fiscal Impacts of Development. Ensure that City policies, regulations, and decision making processes not only consider Town Center design planning impacts, but also consider whether proposed new development will have a positive and acceptable economic impact on the City. In furtherance of this June 28, 2010 Regular Item 606 Page 6 policy, the City Commission may require, as a condition of considering the approval or denial of a development project, that developers provide a written economic fiscal impact report, prepared by a duly qualified expert that details the associated fiscal impacts of any proposed new development project on the City and the School District. STRATEGIC PLAN: The Winter Springs Strategic Plan identified the Town Center as both a strength and an opportunity (other strengths include neighborhoods and planning). Goals and objectives included promoting a sense of community and aggressively completing the vision for the Town Center. The plan also listed community treasures as including the Town Center, schools, family atmosphere, walkable community, upscale atmosphere and enforced standards, and high stable property values. While the strategic plan is not legally binding, it embodies and projects the values, spirit, and visions of the future of the City's citizens and business owners. MAY 14, 2010 CHARETTE /WORKSHOP: On May 14, 2010, Victor Dover (Dover Kohl & Partners, the City's Town Center consultant) provided a charette for the site (the applicant agreed to pay the cost) with the applicant and City staff. The following are the highlights of his comments and advice for designation as a civic site and subsequent development as a charter school in the Town Center: 1. The Commission should consider determining this to be a Civic Site (Sec. 20 -324 (9) and have a document to memorialize the designation, subject to commitments from the applicant. [staff suggested perhaps a development agreement would be appropriate] The site could be conditionally determined to be a civic site, so that if the land deal fell apart, it could still be developed for commercial or residential purposes. 2. The prominence of the site allows opportunity as a gateway to the Town Center and will alert drivers traveling eastbound, that they are entering a different portion of the City. 3. The building should have a prominent vertical feature as a focal point at the tangent of the prominent east -bound and west -bound terminating vistas. Due to the 2 story height and its location in important terminating vistas, the building should be located as far west (toward Parkstone) as possible, to make it appear large and prominent. 4. In an urban setting, where land is scarce and valuable, a vertically sloped and fenced pond can be an acceptable amenity (e.g. a reflecting pond; an urban water edge), incorporating appropriate fencing (e.g. the pond behind City Hall). Consider off -site retention possibilities and options (e.g. the enclave property to the west) and other alternatives (some underground). 5. The student drop -off area needs to not look like a parking lot. 6. Parking determination should be made on the side of not over - paving. The objective is to strike the correct balance and to have a plan "B" for special events which might be a shared parking solution (with Winter Springs High School or Central Winds Park). June 28, 2010 Regular Item 606 Page 7 7. To keep the 434 side from looking like a parking lot, it should be designed for the cars to park among the trees (a site that will look good when the cars are not there and not bad when they are). 8. Perimeter fencing should look like an extension of the architecture. Conceal as much of the perimeter fence as possible in the trees and landscaping — with attractive vistas in thru the vegetation [There was discussion of a fence possibly incorporating masonry footer, base, and columns and imitation wrought iron pickets and of how chain link is prohibited in the Town Center]. 9. The complete site needs to be considered, including buildings, fences, parking, and other features, as they will appear/be seen from the intersection of the Cross Seminole Trail and Old 434. 10. Signage should complement the site. Instead of a monument sign, consider a monument with signage. There are a lot of signage options in the town center code. Do not look at the monument sign out front or the clock towers to emulate [there was discussion of building mounted signage, including signage projecting from the roof]. 11. If the applicant were seeking LEED status, provision of a small school brings LEED ND (neighborhood) points. FISCAL IMPACT: Development of the site as a school would remove the property from the tax rolls. The Urban Land Institute notes that neighborhood schools are a primary consideration for many home buyers and are often a significant factor in residential development demand and sales price. If parents patronize local merchants, while waiting for their children, and the school incorporates local dance, martial arts, or music classes, these could be an additional significant positive effect on the local economy. Please see the attachment, which addresses the history and economics of the school. The potential tax revenue for the property has been accessed for both a residential as well as a commercial development scenario. Since the property, if used as a charter school, would be removed from the tax rolls, the City Commission needs to be aware of the potential for lost tax revenue when considering designation of the property as a civic site and when entertaining any statements from the applicant relative to ancillary revenues as a result of the location of the school. Tax revenue scenarios are as follows: • The undeveloped property currently pays $20, 643 in property taxes. June 28, 2010 Regular Item 606 Page 8 • Townhomes (76 units), as proposed in a 2006 design submittal Units (1,200 square feet) — assessed at $90 /square foot: $8,208,000 $8,208,000/1000 = 8208 8,208 (2.5814) = $21,188.13 $21,188.13 (less the 4% statutory discount) = $20,340.61 tax revenue • Commercial (floor area ratio of 20 %) 8.7 acres (43,560 square feet) = 378,972 square feet FAR of 20% = 75,794 square feet of commercial development 75,794 square feet assessed at $105 /square foot = $7,958,412 $7,958,412/1000 = 7,958.41 7,958.41 (2.5814) - $20,543.84 $20,543.84 (less the 4% statutory discount) = $19,722.09 tax revenue The tax revenue estimates for the residential and the commercial scenarios would be added to the tax revenue for the vacant property, thereby generating tax revenues of $40,983.61 for the residential scenario and $40,365.09 for the commercial scenario. COMMUNICATION EFFORTS: No communication efforts beyond the advertising of the Commission agenda are necessary in conjunction with this agenda item. A sign at the site and mailing to abutting property owners was provided for the public hearing for the associated special exception. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Commission approve the concept plan, subject to (1) special exception approval and any associated conditions, (2) the applicant and staff working out the issues outlined above, during site plan and aesthetic review and (3) approval of a development agreement. ATTACHMENTS: A Location map B Dover Kohl memo C Student population map D Concept plan E History and economic report • • ATTACHMENT A 1 II AI H Lake Jesup • ► ,-- G • F ,/---------7-N\ 0 302 a, ° i t " • - 0 K 430 1020 CENj P ND S \ \ \ � � J C �'3 X6 138, 740 �2 A 1 ► C . w 742 3 c till 744 n c �i \ 0 746 m z D 747 748 ka a Z r 749 750 _ D -O 75] 752 370 r 1 754 Z \ t II' 756 N HERE 9 9 3 1 /58 b 760 350 A � C ° o ti o 762 ; c' 764 enlral • s .' 766 330 - • . Pak - ° L " y 768 - - 1000 ► V . , 770 V 772 -- _- - L-:. J °° ° 774 870 310 900 ---- -- B , 877 b a .N O 931 . '`�`� v,3- ` \� A 123`1 l - et? ` y�-- xCr$7 Continued Pg 2419 1 • 2 A 3 A 4 • 5 A 6 • 7 • 8 1 MILE w NOTES: - r :r - S 4 - 9 r_ K� . \ Municipal Address Map Book ° 200 "°FeM it { PR I NTED: R � ; //. ,F� ` A pr 2005 z s • ;, 1 ,k.14 �, - F� I Pa e Map 2411 > ' : • - 1 ; City of Winter Springs, PAGE LOCATION KEY MAP WITH 1 & 2 MILE RADIUS RINGS Developed By: Southeastern Surveying &Mapping Corp. ATTACHMENT B DOVER, KOHL & PARTNERS t o w n p l a n n i n g Memorandum To: Randy Stevenson, John Baker City of Winter Springs Cc: Victor Dover From: James Dougherty Date: June 4, 2010 Subject: Elementary Charter School: On- Street Parking Considerations The Charter School proposed for the western end of the Winter Springs Town Center has the potential to be very contributive to the sense of place and vitality of the overall Town Center. Substantial progress was made during the May 14, 2010 meeting with the applicant, where revisions to the site plan were discussed to enhance the Charter School's physical civic presence and contribution to the walkability of the surrounding urban fabric. Discussion continues regarding the inclusion of on- street parking on streets surrounding the Charter School. Examination of precedents for in -town urban elementary schools may be helpful, demonstrating that on- street parking has substantial benefits. Benefits of on- street parking adjacent to schools include: 1. Reduction of need for on -site parking lots — Adjacent on- street parking, when dedicated for school use during key school hours, offsets the need for on -site spaces in a parking lot. Reduction of the site area dedicated to parking lots is very useful when attempting to design a site plan with multiple high quality `presentation faces'. The Winter Springs Charter School has just such a site. The parcel is constrained in size and shape making parking lots and other back -of -house items difficult to shield from street frontages. Parking lots between a building face and the adjacent street should be avoided whenever possible when creating walkable streets as envisioned for the Winter Springs Town Center. 2. Traffic calming — On- street parking is one of the very best tools available to urban designers when configuring streets to slow the travel speed of cars. On- street parking, like other elements of spatial containment such as street trees and street - oriented buildings, provides `visual friction'. When a vehicular travel lane is dimensionally constrained by visible objects, drivers are compelled to travel more slowly. Slowing vehicular traffic in this manner is especially critical in areas where children are expected to be present. Winter Springs Town Center Elementary Charter School: on- street parking June 4, 2010 Page 2 of 6 3. Protection for pedestrians — On- street parking, like regularly- spaced street trees, functions as a physical barrier between the sidewalk and vehicular travel lanes. This leads to increased comfort and safety for pedestrians. Attached are images of two Florida precedents for elementary schools embedded within walkable neighborhoods. Both feature adjacent streets with on- street parking. Celebration School K -8, Celebration, FL 4$ ' , g At 'I' 4" li ', '. f - ' ' f 14 � � � \ i w`' t i r 1114- r 7;441 y This view shows the school facility configured to provide high quality street frontages on multiple sides. The main front entrance of the facility faces the triangular green in the foreground of the photo. Parking, loading facilities and other back -of -house items are screened from view from streets and public spaces. Other street - oriented uses, including rowhouses and apartments, face the school facility across traffic- calmed streets. On- street parallel parking features prominently on these surrounding streets. This parking provides traffic- calming, and reduces the school's need for on -lot parking to only a small rear parking lot. In the back right corner of the photo, space - efficient bus drop -offs can be seen located between the sidewalk and the face of the building. Winter Springs Town Center Elementary Charter School: on- street parking June 4, 2010 Page 3 of 6 ' t i r , v. y " ' e :. .� n - ,4, \ ,\ d• Y f \ .‘ 6 \ II \ ' ' /-41k, „.-- ,;.‘ It., This zoomed -in view clearly shows on- street parking adjacent to the school. f w 1, . " • i ' . n ' ,rte, — . . ` , ' � • +! I- ' . t ..: This view, looking the opposite direction, shows the school's close walkable proximity to the heart of Celebration's mixed -use town center. Winter Springs Town Center Elementary Charter School: on- street parking June 4, 2010 Page 4 of 6 Riviera Day School, Coral Gables, FL • r 1. r .. • 004 .. a • - t 3 . M ti 6 4 i , , . ',„ ,,, . ,-..„ --....- :.,..,.. , r Riviera Day School, a private elementary school, sits at the center of this image. It is comprised of the buildings around the visible swimming pool and basketball court, and also the courtyard building to their right. The school is embedded within the Riviera neighborhood visible on the left half of the image, and downtown South Miami on the right side of the image. The school faces the public Riviera Park (under construction in this image). The school is integrated completely within the walkable neighborhood fabric. It is surrounded on multiple sides by traffic- calmed tree -lined streets with on- street parking. Winter Springs Town Center Elementary Charter School: on- street parking June 4, 2010 Page 5 of 6 , . 1, ' iltn. 0 * • 1 4 LZtril. .,: Il i. ti ' a. L - 4 ., , ' , '!..: ?fir. �, 1'��Vi ., ! ^"" ti ' I ,. .1 I' ' ms ''• i _ tI `b .qx i '' ✓ . 'y am *.+ y.„ .,. t - y� v Signs restrict on- street parking to Riviera Day School use only during pick -up times. . Winter Springs Town Center Elementary Charter School: on- street parking June 4, 2010 Page 6 of 6 Af • 11 4 y • a 1 w `4 r, mow"'' _. r The streets around the Riviera Day School feature metered on- street diagonal parking. This parking is available to the public most of the time, but is restricted to school use only during key school times. Also prominent in this image is the fence defining the edge of the school grounds from the public sidewalk. �.. Residential parking permits do not take effect on adjacent on- street parking spaces until after school hours, allowing an efficient sharing of parking between the school and its neighbors. ATTACHMENT C Student Population • Bug , 41 7 .• , ;i oreli - • s H �� 4teHwy46 • c Q b4 r ountir Ivy ii6 A • n s p / " m c � • �� • Heathro a j� Hwy 46a _ • State Hwy 46• • • c W .0 N " \o • � D m • Airport � Legend o • oil 0. • V. • '411 E ake Mary U L ^ 1 Mile o Ma o • • zr • m • • e 3 Miles f enwoo• • ♦ • • . o G° • • • 5 Miles / I ^1 °® m • 0 � � E i � o ��° 0 8 a 00 ° D % tai 00 N �° o cP A 4. m ,o ,•ood Hills a d i 8- y S s i 0 90 f 0 dgo ,_ � Q P• y * gab State�Ay 434 O o 0 00 0 0 '� 4 • ° O ° 0 o ° m tale Hwy 4 b 0 00 , • • '. c aur lh o Charlotte ° / • f-� • 1 ✓ O © • • o • n • o¢� 00 `' ,61�, 0 0 0 � In ter SPr(n • z ° Central o ° - . Lake ' • d • ° °o ° � o 0 o • % • . ,i6 O ,y♦ / 4 To • ` • o ° v ° o / lkis • • o L eo 0 R Bug L • • R ea La ,/ s o State H ,1iai • • V • 0 • • o • 5 m ` m, • i m ora. Y • �' .+ ` - • ell Bran M Co a Keffiedy Lake - • t 4nry Park 1- , Mcculloch P.1 tate Hwy 42 • . to 1- co Mors- Sta v ersi Unive Ili ersity • y - Cady iik E Shade r v 0 v� Mai • -ke Sue co • JIN ctic State H I. A n C. tine , State H ! A o >, o 2 , p ini ` I State gW 50 - i i State i11 �� EFAVIIII 0 1.25 2.5 5 Miles I I i I I i i I I ELEMENTARY CHARTER SCHOOL • WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA PROJECT DATA 1 PRIMARY HIERARCHY: . BUILDING BLDG. AREA (SF) R Q'D. PARKING PROVIDED PARKING PARKING CALL c — (65 ) CENTRAL WINDS PARK CHARTER SCHOOL TWO -STORY 50,000 SF 7j 57 PAVED 1 PER STAFF 65 EST. r-r ; +'�` �-- 34 UNPAVED , 1 PER 100 STUDENTS (650) .• 10+ STREET NO. 419 - --'`- --- J CONCRETE POWER POLE PARENT DROP -OFF ON SITE STACKING: 60 VEHICLES ! STREET LY S.R. N- 434 (S•R' _ - -_� _____— —` / - CURB f_ � � (50 O R /\N� �--- R E •G �--_.. OE _______L-- 1 - P d� ....- • D SIG O S S ID E P N y -",i,-----7-11,—; / • er UTILITY i •'" \ --- - _ - i - - -.- w. .� y � f 0.0.Tb 1.41.15/C I a x . "... nom.,, i -- , - _ . ,.� ! , OM CHARTER SCHOOL Wit '#+.°"" _. _...__._...]._.- -". ___ �-.._ B US'TURN '" TWO-STORY - ,.:r fi . • �• . �`'.' ', ..-- -. �... _ --� . __ FENCED PLAY AREA ' \T . �` �`' out rte_ .. `\ 4 V IST A?►___ - - -� . o SF � ` ......Y T \ _' --- _.. .. ,< _ — ... y � � 1 `� .owN N fy ENTRY � -- i 1 DOS TINGE` c ■ -� - - RETENTION POND Dial <- " I`i� _ °,r \ I -1 "......,,,.. ; � , f, , ..__''T�;,... . � -„—` ` 1�F' " " a . x• 1 A e 1 . I►seQ - r b °y „, % \ \ Y 1 oNCPErECUPE u.. -y OFF ( — "�� `E 15 TING TREES ; . ' .L f `_ �. 1TTROP- AC T $ REMAIN N ..........,:,_ 60 5T K y \ . . a k" . 1 1 .�.. . (F/ -, I 1 FRfO elf S! \, i i s 7 s io o li G C LqY fir' \ cp -� _� 1 FR'' � ] a 1 e. t Rt 6 \\ I 43 r It �? _• , {���,t EXISTING TREES I A \ Y _ - -, � RE AlN ' e I 3 ^.UNP } \ 1 r r ARC - q o A ,.. ,,,✓✓✓ v a? _rte \ 1 1 EXISTING `�� (R W O'q0 N S . R . \ +� ..,,, R NG R "'a, " ! ' -.1 •:, ^` RI • 434 _-----,-__,,----4-1,,,i ' ` , "1,,—r-- ", TO REMAIN TREES \ ° 1 , OPEN PARK AREA ; v 4, I 44 ' g A 1 _ :. \ . 's , $ I I ■ � \ 1 � BIG T YPI � '>,„,,,, � ..��' •' � _111-"\-1- "' a . ..` ■ ""' .`,....:,. ,,, „.. `�—\\` 1 \ � g3 EXISTING TO REMAIN ...•?� \ • k ; ` ,St ` � \ ~� \ �_ `��7 sr"' EFI / ; ED VIEWS �� OHE NO • IT IS . - INT • • _ I OF THE PROJECT TO KEEP AS >1111111111' :� , s, . - 1 . MANY REES TO • EMAI ' . 1 � NTRAL W ,� �� < ,- S a„ I 1 \ POS IBLE E PECIALLY ' • • ��` ` / Cj q M x 1 I � � S .R. 4 34 AND CENTRAL WINDS D'. ` ` - MANHOLE � � w\ \ C1� \1 I I .' LANDSCAPED � � / % � � I t �� � GROUND SIGN \ �/ i �� 6 0 ''', , NAEF D s ��A_ (�� e• I I \ POLE AND HOP IG SURVEYOR'S NOTES ��� I \ \ 0 25 50 700 4a0t1 fr 1 - L , BURKE HOGUE SINES MILLS. INC ;l ■ MASTER SITE PLAN - D .1 1130 BUSINESS CENTER OR p� LAKE MARY, FL 32746 Z .53.. 4CJ 4 ' .bhm.us 7.333.2005 to 4 P ", '[� Z C.'aY am- +.12 .com 4.-1 * AAC000233 34.- TER Fns P N,NC' 2010.016 05.21.10 c\"1 -- p rr1 G • ELEMENTARY CHARTER SCHOOL *� ■WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIOR " mES «cE p} y xx av CORNICE Exm s/o «s ` { - _ ----- I , /� EXPRESSION LINE 1a 1 - i 4! ., � / � ,. _.. .._ - ..>.... a� e L.... x 5.. , £ �. )„:„..)))1 .» F. A L. . +.��! p � ! r. NORTH ELEVATION (PRIMARY HIERARCHY - CENTRAL WINDS PARK) a: _ : E�x�E.xESE «EE ., , � a EXPRESSIONS y --} y t' rEESSio «u «E ( . th„ , s �� Y/ a 1j Ir ;411V 7I f .. `r : i ^ • ' : s' ' � r MOAN ■ SOUTH ELEVATION • ' I/ AR. 43.1 VISTAS TERIONATE AND CONVERGE APPROXIMATELY AT TM MEAL TOWER E ,:, E « a EXPRESSIONS smT <E c a ma mss.,. o w sr m. Ihulaxner k PR,. ...«a. and w w«.■N.«nfw ,INN "°"'I's•. . >'" a " E � 4 � s ,% � 77-1.--). . AS AVIE *LOAN. WEB ., 'K IOW 414/ ∎ WEST ELEVATION (EASTBOUND S.R. 434 VISI`A TERMINATION) CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS ATTACHMENT E History Choices in Learning was organized in 2000 and opened for school in 2001. The School has been managed and run successfully for 9 full school years. Choices in Learning received a 15 year Charter from SCPS. Choices in Learning consistently is an A rated School Choices in Learning is a high performing public school that has Board of Directors that is responsible for the operation of the School. The Board of Directors is a combination of parents and local business people in the community. They have dealt very effectively with numerous challenges throughout the years such as hiring and firing Principals, the unexpected death of another principal in mid -year, the unfortunate death of 3 children while in the care of a dysfunctional parent, and relocation of the school in order to meet the demand. The School has solid leadership. Money and Economics Financial Overview of the School 2009 -2010 • 2009 -2010 operating budget was $3.6 million • Payroll and associated taxes was $2.0 million • Revenue for procured services is $1.6 million • 45 employees • Most of the employees have 4 year degrees, some have masters degrees • Finish the 2009 -2010 year at least $450,000 in the black. • $1,350,000 of cash in the bank as of April 30, 2010. • Finish the business year with $1,150,000 after modular expenses. • No debt Projected financial information of the School in 2011 -2012 • Projected operating budget will be $5.1 million • Payroll and associated taxes will be $2.46 million • Debt payment on new facility will be $700,000 • 60 employees (creation of 15 new jobs) • Cash in the bank will grow steadily from today forward even with facility payment. Controls and Responsibility The School is audited every year by a 3` Party CPA. The last three Annual Audit Reports that were recorded in Tallahassee are included on the disk. Please contact the auditor and check us out — James Moore and Company out of Daytona is the CPA firm. Audits have always been very positive and the corrective recommendations noted by the Auditors become part of the SOP. The School employees a full -time business manager that oversees all of the daily accounting and procurement activities. School also has an independent CPA review our books each month. The Board ensures the School runs in a fiscally responsible manner. The Project Choices in Learning has a solid financial position. The project will be funded with permanent financing through bond issue. The IDA granted approval May 19, 2010 The overall Project Value (land, design and construction, FF &E) is expected to be $8.5 million. Debt Service Coverage Ratio remains well above 1.1 and cash in the bank will in excess of seven figures. Path Moving Forward Concept Approval Special Exception Development Agreement Start Designing