HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010 06 28 Public Hearings 501 Town Center Special Exception for 25,000 SF Building CITY COMMISSION
AGENDA
Consent
Informational
ITEM 501 Public Hearing X
Regular
June 28, 2010
Meeting Mgr. / Dept
Authorization
REQUEST: The Community Development Department requests the Commission, in its capacity
as the Development Review Committee for the Town Center, hold a public hearing to consider
the special exception for a building with at least a 25,000 SF building footprint and make a
recommendation to the City Commission.
SYNOPSIS: This agenda item is for the first phase of a special exception to authorize and allow
a building footprint larger than 20,000 square feet (SF) within the Town Center, as required by
sections 20 -321 (C) (3) and 20 -324 (12) of the City Code. The request is for a school with a
footprint of at least 25,000 SF (2 -story school totaling 50,000 SF). Waivers of certain code
provisions may also be accomplished through the special exception process pursuant to the
criteria set forth in Secion 20 -321 (C).
CONSIDERATIONS:
LAND USE, ZONING DESIGNATION, ETC.:
Zoning: Town Center
Future Land Use Designation: Town Center
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
Florida Statutes
Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 9, City Code
Chapter 20, City Code
Section 20 -321
C. Special Exceptions:
June 28, 2010
PH Item 501
Page 2
The City Commission may by special exception waive strict compliance with
provisions of this code. In granting a special exception, the City Commission must
find by substantial competent evidence that:
1. The proposed development contributes to, promotes and encourages the
improvement of the Winter Springs Town Center and catalyzes other development
as envisioned in the Winter Springs Town Center regulations.
2. The proposed development will not have an unfavorable effect on the economy of the
Winter Springs Town Center.
3. The proposed development abides by all rules in this code other than those specially
excepted. Special limitations apply to Large Footprint Buildings (greater than 20,000
square feet); see section 20 -324 (12) for these limitations.
4. The proposed development meets any reasonable additional conditions, restrictions or
limitations deemed necessary by the City Commission in order to preserve and promote
the intent of the Winter Springs Town Center Master Plan.
Procedure for Special Exceptions:
1. Approval may be granted only after a minimum of two discretionary reviews. The
first review shall be before the Development Review Committee, at which time the
Development Review Committee shall review the project and provide to the City
Commission an advisory recommendation regarding approval, approval with conditions,
or disapproval. The second review shall be a public hearing held before the City
Commission and shall be held no sooner than seven calendar days following the
Development Review Committee hearing.
2. Requests for special exceptions under this ordinance shall include each exhibit required
in the Administration Review Process per section II, part B of this code. In addition, the
City Commission may within reason require additional exhibits and may defer approval
of the special exception application or schedule an additional public hearing or hearings
to review those exhibits.
3. Special exceptions shall not be unreasonably withheld, but the City Commission shall
have authority to require that the applicant satisfy any additional conditions it deems
necessary to fulfill goals of the master plan, including reasonable offsite improvements
directly related and proportionate to the specific impact of the request, or further
review(s) and approval by the Development Review Committee.
4. The City Commission may grant the approval of an application for special exceptions
from the code in whole or in part upon a majority vote of its members.
June 28, 2010
PH Item 501
Page 3
D. Site Development Agreement Option:
The City may enter into a Site Development Agreement with the user or developer of a
property, relating to development of a particular parcel or tract of land, and such an
agreement may address such issues as impact fee credits; a specialized or negotiated
concept of design or site plan development authorized or sanctioned by this ordinance;
infrastructure service credits or public - private participation in funding, design or
construction; or other incentives based upon strict compliance with requirements of this
ordinance. The Agreement will be mutually acceptable to all parties. Considerations for
the City in deciding whether to participate in such an agreement will include
compliance with the objectives and design criteria specified in this ordinance;
demonstration of a cost benefit to City and developer; consideration of development
amenities provided by the developer. Such a Site Development Agreement shall be
adopted and be in conformance with the requirements of the Florida Municipal Home
Rule Powers Act or Sections 163.3220 through 163.4243, Florida Statutes, as to effect,
duration, public hearing requirements and other issues.
Section 20 -324
(12) Large Footprint
B uildings:
Buildings with a footprint li _., , , , ; �, , , 1 A I greater than twenty thousand • (20,000) square feet may be r i
built within the Town Center ' :— - --- -
District by special exception ''„ '.,,
only. Such buildings must abide ___
by all rules in this division with
the following special limitations: - ..,
Undesirable
Undesirable Large Footprint Buildings have blank facades
and sit behind a field of parkingand sit behind a field of parking.
ill i 4C jii : ' , ., 1 1' 4
•f,,, '
, f p
t .- JAI ki., toi 4 4 ,
iks, - %
, _ ...),,,, 7 , I
A- It
1 ' 4 41
41114/4 ...':
.-- r .. , Desiib ,,„, . .
i 1 i .. I - - I e l % , -- .-
...,,
' t : . . , x ., is. . , , . ,
. .
June 28, 2010
PH Item 501
Page 4
Desirable Large Footprint Buildings are wrapped in a liner of smaller buildings with
doors and windows facing the street.
b. To encourage use by pedestrians and decrease the need for solely auto - oriented
patronage, large- Footprint buildings must reinforce the urban character of the Town
Center and shall therefore continue a connected system of walkable street frontages.
d. Loading docks, service areas and trash disposal facilities shall not face streets, parks,
squares or significant pedestrian spaces.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
The vegetated 8.7 acre site is strategically located along the north side of SR 434, at the western-most
terminus of the Town Center, where two (2) important [visual] terminating vistas along SR 434 meet. It
is also bounded by the Cross Seminole Trail, Central Winds Park, the Hound Ground paw park, and the
high school. Across SR 434 is Heritage Park and its associated 1.6 acre undeveloped commercial site.
The applicant is doing "due diligence" to purchase the site for a 50,000 S.F., 2- story, charter elementary
school for approximately 450 - 650 students (most of whom are projected to live within 6 miles). This is
the relocation of the existing Choices in Learning Elementary School, which is currently located in
Longwood, on the north side of SR 434, just beyond 17 -92. The attached map demonstrates that a
number of the current students live in Winter Springs.
Staff has noted (1) that the site will be removed from the tax rolls and (2) that state law may
exempt site development from abiding by Town Center aesthetic controls, unless the applicant
commits to meeting City architectural and aesthetic standards. The City Commission
subsequently may address these issues through the concept plan and development agreement as
well as through conditions to the special exception (as authorized by Subsection 20 -321 (C) (1)
(d)). Planning literature states that small high quality elementary schools typically add monetary
value to nearby residential properties, which results in increased property taxes.
Section 20 -323 (a) of the City Code lists schools as a permitted use within the Town Center.
Section 20 -324 (9) of the City Code provides for the designation of certain sites having special
public importance to be designated as "civic sites." This allows the civic building certain
architectural flexibility to create a special architectural statement, which Dover Kohl and staff
believe is important for this site. The Commission conditionally approved the civic site
designation at its June 14, 2010 meeting.
The site is subject to the Town Center provisions of the comprehensive plan (Future Land Use
Element) and the Town Center Code (sections 20 -320 through 20 -327 of the City Code). Section
163.3194, Florida Statutes, requires any development approved or undertaken by a local
government to be consistent with the comprehensive plan (i.e. no waivers are allowed from the
comp plan requirements). This development constitutes the first civic site that has come before
the City Commission. Staff believes that state law may exempt public schools from aesthetic and
building requirements, unless agreed to in a legal document, such as a development agreement.
Pertinent Town Center issues include, but are not limited to ensuring the provision of prominent
public architecture, particularly at the terminating vistas (from both east and west, as well as
June 28, 2010
PH Item 501
Page 5
from the intersection of the trail and Central Winds Parkway - primarily the view from east-
bound SR 434), the interaction between a school on this site with the adjacent trail and park, and
the prominent role that a small school can play at this location for the Town Center, the nearby
residents, and the City.
Site development topics include potential re- alignment of Central Winds Parkway and the park
entrance, adjacent on- street parking (which may involve providing additional right -of -way),
minimizing on -site parking and stacking, site orientation toward the park and the trail, proper
signage (a monument sign along SR 434 requires a special exception), adequate sidewalks, cross-
walks, and pedestrian access, Subsection 20 -321 (c) (1) (c) "large footprint building"
requirements, retention pond requirements and options, fencing, the existing specimen trees,
security, and aesthetic Town Center architecture controls. The building footprint of at least
25,000 SF (50,000 SF 2 -story building) is requested for a special exception. The purpose of
requiring a special exception, as illustrated by the Town Center Code, is to avoid the Town
Center from having (usually single story) "big box" buildings that are usually set back
considerably from the roadway and sprawl across their sites in seas of on -site parking spaces,
without regard to the public realm, place making, or pedestrian scale and orientation. In contrast,
the proposed 2 -story building has been located in a manner to create a strong positive presence
onto Central Winds Parkway, the trail, and the adjacent parks, as required by the Section 20 -325
of the Code, as well as to provide important terminating vistas from both directions on SR 434.
Site plan and aesthetic review will ensure proper detailing for these frontages as well as the SR
434 frontage.
As a matter of comparison, the only special exception for a building with a footprint larger than
20,000 SF within the City (this only applies within the Town Center) is the existing 44,000 SF
Publix. The existing high school received site plan approval and was built before adoption of the
Town Center Code. The most recent (approved in 2003) school built within the City is the Layer
Elementary, located on SR 419, which is outside of the Town Center. It has a 66,837 square foot
main building on 15.41 developed acres of a 34.37 acre site and includes 112 parking spaces (70
for staff, 36 visitor, and 6 handicap accessible spaces).
CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION:
As noted above, Section 20 -321 sets forth the following criteria for special exceptions:
1. The proposed development contributes to, promotes and encourages the improvement
of the Winter Springs Town Center and catalyzes other development as envisioned in
the Winter Springs Town Center regulations.
The proposed development furthers the Town Center, is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan, particularly Future Land Use Element policies 2.2.1, 2.2.2,
2.2.4; Public Schools Facilities Element goal 1, objective 1.6, policies 1.6.2, 1.7.1;
Recreation and Open Space Element policy 1.7.3; and furthers the Section 20-
325 Town Center Code provisions for civic sites. Small elementary schools, sited
at prominent locations are noted as key assets to a neighborhood and to the
community.
June 28, 2010
PH Item 501
Page 6
2. The proposed development will not have an unfavorable effect on the economy of the
Winter Springs Town Center.
The undeveloped site currently has an approximately $20,000 tax bill. Staff
estimates of 76 townhomes averaging 1,200 SF each would yield approximately
$20,000 additional to the total tax bill from the site (as would a commercial 0.20
floor area ratio).
The applicant states that the school had a 2009 -2010 operating budget of $3.6
million, payroll (and associated taxes) for 45 employees of $2.0 million, revenue
for procured services of $1.6 million, finished its 2009 -2010 year at least
$450,000 in the black, $1,350,000 in the bank (on 04/30/10), and no debt.
They project an operating budget of $5.1 million, a payroll for 60 employees (15
new jobs) of $2.46 million, and debt payment on the new facility of $700,000.
Planning literature states, as a general rule, that a small high quality elementary
school boosts residential property values at the neighborhood and often
community level.
3. The proposed development abides by all rules in this code other than those specially
excepted. Special limitations apply to Large Footprint Buildings (greater than 20,000
square feet); see section 20 -324 (12) for these limitations.
This request is for approval for the building with a footprint larger than 20,000
SF. The site plan and aesthetic review may result in waiver requests. At this
time, the following are potential waiver requests (some supported by staff):
a. dedication of right -of -way and provision of on- street parking along east side
of the site to create a Town Center Street (staff does not support);
b. provision of on- street parking along all of the south side of Hicks Avenue
(old SR 434, along north side of site, adjacent to the Cross Seminole Trail),
where the site narrows, due to need for stormwater pond in the low portion
of the site and the need to provide at least a 6 foot wide sidewalk;
c. a fenced stormwater pond with steeper slopes and narrower maintenance
berm than allowed by code; and
d. the SR 434 frontage road (Dover Kohl and staff support waiving the frontage
road for this use at this site).
4. The proposed development meets any reasonable additional conditions, restrictions or
limitations deemed necessary by the City Commission in order to preserve and
promote the intent of the Winter Springs Town Center Master Plan.
The applicant appears to agree to execute binding commitments that the charter
school site and buildings will be designed and built to Town Center standards.
June 28, 2010
PH Item 501
Page 7
FISCAL IMPACT:
The undeveloped site currently has an approximately $20,000 tax bill. Staff estimates of 76
townhomes averaging 1,200 SF each would yield approximately $20,000 additional to the total
tax bill from the site (as would a commercial 0.20 floor area ratio).
The applicant states that the school had a 2009 -2010 operating budget of $3.6 million, payroll
(and associated taxes) for 45 employees of $2.0 million, revenue for procured services of $1.6
million, finished its 2009 -2010 year at least $450,000 in the black, $1,350,000 in the bank (on
04/30/10), and no debt.
They project an operating budget of $5.1 million, a payroll for 60 employees (15 new jobs) of
$2.46 million, and debt payment on the new facility of $700,000.
Planning literature states, as a general rule, that a small high quality elementary school boosts
residential property values at the neighborhood and often community level.
COMMUNICATION EFFORTS:
A substantial and conspicuous sign has been erected at the site to notice the public hearing and
property owners within 150 feet of the site have been notified by mail in addition to the postings
by the City Clerk's office.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Commission, in its capacity as the Town Center DRC,
recommend approval of the special exception for a building with footprint larger than 20,000
square feet, subject to the applicant closing on the site and executing a binding development
agreement with the City.
ATTACHMENTS:
A Location map
B Application package
C Map of current student residences
D Concept plan, aerial photo, and rendering
E School history and economic summary
ATTACHMENT A
H
Lake Jesup
(
F l '
U •
0
• 1 ... L... ...1 Cri IS\ ____--i-r---,,------N 00
'-: u .. •� �- 302 to
U < 4.. ' a + , a CEN
a 2
'� 1020 L yN'INDS
, 43 C
TRA o
i, pK Cott U
P.3 � : 38 "
i .
o .. 1:. 740 " \ . `
II' a v 742 F: p L. 0 W ^ 744 _ ? 9 _ 0 F
o 746 i Ifl ' \ /
Z �J
D U 7 4 7 748 .4
I
749 50. D •p .
751. 752
_. 370
754 4
► 756
p
DI -0
S8 -�
t ,�
760 350
C a A',°„_ 762 ", • •
. 764 _._- . -
0 . t CI , .'766 _ 330 -
o-
o ; '^ W r-• - 768 Pa,* •
i
770
".--1----1 v '772 -- t
u 7,......-_.`"' ° 1774 870 1 3 900 _
v 776 1
•
B .
i
. Oa 778 � � - 10 - . / / %a�r.7T
Continued Pi 2419
_1A 2 A 3 A 4 A 5 A 6 1 7 8
w. • ,,,,,, NOTES:
.a.
N.
W iii-4 9 _.; p ` `'G ,D . s , .: - -. - 0 200 400
d � • � = Municipal Address Map Book
„ 1 1 : PRINTED: REVISED:
■ � .� V � • �, t ' _ Apr 2005 2 : 3
j► • • City of Springs, (
Winter Spri FL Map
2411
�' - �• •! m � P age
PAGE LOCATION KEY MAP WITH 1 & 2 NILE RADIUS RINGS Deve aped By. Southeastern Surveying & Mapping Corp.
SCSI ATTACHMENT B
205 West State Road 434 Suite D
Winter Springs, FL 32708
BREEN CONSTRUCTION NUM= = . Phone 407.542.3961 1 Fax 407.542.3964
2010 (610t
June 16, 2010
Mr. John Baker
Senior Planner
City of Winter Springs
1126 East S.R. 434
Winter Springs, FL 32708
RE: Board of Adjustment for Special Exception
Parcel #26- 20- 30- 5AR -OD00 -0180
Parcel #26- 20 -30- 5AR -0D00 -020A
Dear Mr. Baker,
We would first like to thank you and your associates for their time and attention spent
meeting with us on June 14 2010. As requested, please find enclosed herewith our
Application for Special Exception to accompany our Conceptual Development Plan
Submittal (Winter Springs Project Number 201000896).
Included with this application is:
• A copy of the most recent survey of the subject property.
• A copy of the legal description reflecting the property boundaries. This is located
on the survey itself.
• One, 11x17 Map showing the adjacent streets and zoning and land use
classifications on the adjacent properties.
• Names and addresses of property owners within 150' of property line.
• Map showing area that is within the 150' buffer of property
• Notarized Authorization of Owner.
• Application fee of $500.
• Master Plan D.1 from Conceptual Development Plan Submittal (supplemental
information to demonstrate appropriate size of proposed building as it relates to
property and the surroundings).
Thank you in advance for reviewing this information. Please contact our office if you
have any questions.
Sincerely,
BREEN CONSTRUCTION SERVICES INC.
nd w :a, er
Project anager
REcEiV
COM' nNcEchn KINGS
, CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
O .. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 4 O F- 0 1126 STATE ROAD 434
V incorporated WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708
..S &, 1959 407 - 327 -5966
14, cco p �L0RID FAX:407- 327 -6695 O10 (9O j
it � ' S
0 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION
c
CONDITIONAL USE PECIAL EXCEPTION
❑ VARIANCE
•
❑ WAIVER 9��
APPLICANT: ( 3 C./4Clc i C.IIt l �J (9A/�+5 ,-� - `Y `is I0wArr6 'Q
Last /� First Middle
MAILING ADDRESS: ( G - 2 r SP t►C6 4/04W
tzfp41iz2 Pit/,( cc- 727 a 9
ity { State Zip Code
PHONE & EMAIL 07� ( 3 Q -� 7 / o q f mIpSho Q /o 1/0 eU^0 y 6 A
If Applicant does NOT own the property: S Pity.*; L4- Z i ' srAS-∎ Z.7"
1 ���j
PROPERTY OWNER: St1P S! ?J-S Ll. �`� 4
� 4 /' ,tf ? Ste — F4 ""`"
Last First Middle
MAILING ADDRESS: (, 0(5 J ✓FCCS /k,4 c 7-,'m 202_,
14,%V,rlfz_ VilAc- , FL 327 s9
State Zip Code
PHONE & EMAIL CCColIJqr S2- "64
This request is for the real property described below:
PROPERTY ADDRESS: b2 Ari C aftc 5el, 1 �' i LA /' Y � r
Z� -' -5 • 4 2 -c9vnO - otEo
TAX PARCEL NUMBER: 20— 2e)-- 3n - s-42 .- neloo - O Zv f
SIZE OF PARCEL: 3 0 1 1 / 5'9 Y. 7 r
Square Feet Acres
EXISTING LAND USE: VACj ) I OW, e..•Th L ,<
Current FUTURE LAND USE Classification: I b V.l cf l- 6 aset — 64146 gt 42 ft
Current ZONING Classification: ' °Lax/ C Jcs..!/■6�
Please state YOUR REQUEST: �t^t2.Al 1%S 5l rc1 7t ?t i L 4 4. L rmo _ P 4 ' 449--
3(4 c 41-14 ( e Th w,ci Carra . (7c.E'Me m
- P2 o r cY 10 . 20 i ocx P> 9Cv 444 'NE �.oAlCf'Ar
gr2.0.6.4 eaM Xi tr S . IFfs' S RIQ .i R '62 tt i., f":"1
March 2005
.7 ct fri a ?y e7+ 6V6 .
The APPLICANT IS RESPONSIBLE for posting the blue notice card (provided by the City) on the site at
least SEVEN (7) DAYS prior to the Board of Adjustment Meeting at which the matter will be considered.
Said notice shall NOT be posted within the City right -of -way. All APPLICANTS shall be afforded minimal
due process as required by law, including the right to receive notice, be heard, present evidence, cross -
examine witnesses, and be represented by a duly authorized representative.
The CITY COMMISSION shall render all final decisions regarding variances, conditional uses and waivers
and may impose reasonable conditions on any approved variance, conditional use or waiver to the extent
deemed necessary and relevant to ensure compliance with applicable criteria and other applicable
provisions of the City Code and Comprehensive Plan. All formal decisions shall be based on competent
substantial evidence and the applicable criteria as set forth in Chapter 20, Zoning. APPLICANTS are
advised that if, they decide to appeal any decisions made at the meetings or hearings with respect to any
matter considered at the meetings or hearings, they will need a record of the proceedings and, for such
purposes, they will need to insure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, at their cost, which
includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based, per 286.0105, Florida Statutes.
Any CONDITIONAL USE, VARIANCE, or WAIVER which may be granted by the City Commission shall
expire two (2) years after the effective date of such approval by the City Commission, unless a building
permit based upon and incorporating the conditional use, variance, or waiver is issued by the City within
said time period. Upon written request of the property owner, the City Commission may extend the
expiration date, without public hearing, an additional six (6) months, provided the property owner
demonstrates good cause for the extension In addition, if the aforementioned building permit is timely
issued, and the building permit subsequently expires and the subject development project is abandoned or
discontinued for a period of six months, the conditional use, variance or waiver shall be deemed expired
and null and void. (Code of Ordinances, Section 20 -36.)
THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE TO BE SUPPLIED WITH THIS APPLICATION:
❑ A copy of the most recent SURVEY of the subject property.
❑ A copy of the LEGAL DESCRIPTION reflecting the property boundaries.
❑ 11 x 17 MAP showing ADJACENT STREETS and ZONING AND LAND USE classifications
on the ADJACENT PROPERTY.
❑ JUSTIFICATION for the Request (See Attached List) /9 047.4.,cA D.v CooII.
❑ NAMES and ADDRESSES of each property owner within 150 ft. of each property line.
❑ Notarized AUTHORIZATION of the Owner,
IF the Applicant is other than the Owner or Attorney for the Owner (see below).
❑ APPLICATION FEES:
FEES are as SHOWN BELOW plus ACTUAL COSTS incurred for ADVERTISING or NOTIFICATION,
and for REIMBURSEMENT for TECHNICAL and/or PROFESSIONAL SERVICES which may be
required in connection with the review, inspection or approval of any development (based on accounting
submitted by the City's Consultant) , payable prior to approval of the pertinent stage of development.
CONDITIONAL USE / SPECIAL EXCEPTION $ 500
WAIVER 00
VARIANCE $ 500
TOTAL DUE $ _U
2
March 2005
By submitting this application you hereby grant temporary right of entry for city officials to enter upon the subject
property for purposes of evaluating Ling this application.
FOR USE WHEN APPLICANT IS OWNER OF THE SUBJECT REAL PROPERTY:
This is to certify that 1 am the Owner in fee simple of subject lands described within this Application for
Board of Adjustment consideration:
Signature of Owner
Sworn to and subscribed before me this
day of 20 Notary Public
My Commission expires:
Personally Known
Produced Identification:
(Type)
Did take an Oath
Did Not take and Oath
FOR USE WHEN APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER OF THE SUBJECT REAL PROPERTY:
1, A 'L. taidawl do hereby, with my notarized signature, allow
3 c Awl opMa2t to represent me in this Application related to m property. The
26 - Ztd TO- Sh le- - 00DD -Ol
property is identified : Tax Parcel Number(s) 7.6 - ZD - it -popO - 0 U
1.ocat� �
S Y3Y winter � P' M ` �tthell 5 5 UrJey o+
s
s rn to and subscribed before me this A O/
t } day of 'f) r% L 2010. tc
My Commission expires:
-
( Personally Known
Produced ID: (Type) Nohry Rubac State of Florida
Did take an Oath p ppeee667
Did Not take and Oath `a Euares ostttnota
3
Match 2005
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST
Taken from Winter Springs Code of Ordinances, Section 20- 33(d):
All Conditional Use recommendations and final decisions shall be based on the
following criteria to the extent applicable. Attach additional paper as necessary:
❑ What is the Conditional Use you are requesting? ide /I/14 eriPkosr
SPEcts-c. E i r c E A .( '8 1-.24.A 4 $dv / Q
( ?.e I-42 C -- Tt,GA,4 Zc coo Sr t-( - 1�1,E Tower/
❑ How is the Conditional Use (including its proposed scale and intensity, traffic -
generating characteristics, and offsite impacts) compatible and harmonious with
adjacent land uses? T ��..f of r 1L P,QoAso
d�L Brun ti PeooarS 7 L 2Lev .ers Pao,oc&) SSE .
❑ Will the Conditional Use adversely impact land use activities in the immediate
vicinity? If no, why not? h/n As' cAlit£ 711,E Z041 r,o4 at=
raE Pao/0441 At t4r. 41 st- tPPot: s pg ss4
Woe. oPf3 u SF.
❑ Demonstrate how the size and shape of the site, the proposed access and
internal circulation, and the design enhancements are adequate to accommodate
the proposed scale and intensity of the conditional use requested. The site shall
be of sufficient size to accommodate design amenities such as screening buffers,
landscaping, open space, off - street parking, and other similar site plan
improvements needed to mitigate against potential adverse impacts of the
proposed use.
- Pe-EA - Se gar's 7b CC: y o< k/,- ) e) - !,)4 . 1
o4.6er xltit'' c. tot obo 096. 4 rrAC plE4 zs
1�E PioPo5f M ► 2 Srae
1 -64f 4 A.7Z WPZ-z- /Z
L�l ST%ZG �rJ� 2 7 c cx) ?a 2,040 cc-
8
45 �� Sf.�. iP Ca p F'4 6,r
Much 2005
❑ WiII the proposed use have an adverse impact on the local economy,
including govprnmental fiscal impact, employment, and property values? If no,
why not? J&/o rd -S PQn rcrr-Ge. Ail0We( 7,e Loci
c£Ccue't 4 `/ /'A y R4 / /t,I 4f cS' CZShd_`D GeV /
Ric was a s 1 4 - il a . e < 4 f , C ; / .r nlE'w ,b es 7�•A^>l�l�'L
�i ErPs7 7< mss, 4 u,VC2 - f.E oaf V V..V ocs
❑ Will the proposed use have an adverse impact on natural environment,
including air, water, and noise pollution, vegetation and wildlife, open space,
noxious and desirable vegetation, and flood hazards? If no, why not?
Ato Be 4 (4 3 o r 4'j € / 'sue f 4 I4(4
c/Si tic7? 4 ? Slit !-1 4 kt4 Y AO" r1r2 A *-
Z'rtia/kr w - et 4- x^t►z 4 .
❑ Will the proposed use have an adverse impact on historic, scenic and cultural
resources, including views and vistas, an• loss or degradation of cultural and,...„
historic resources? If no, why not? ... o 4 ir ' i
Lo LY�/gGcy0E'q 4A(.0 R1''
e V Pei-Aride4 , 4V � ixi4 /%=le. 47ik
❑ Will the proposed use have an adverse impact on public services, including
water, sewer, surface water management, police, fire, parks and recreation,
streets, public transportation, ►►pparina and waterways, and bicycle and pedestrian
facilities? If no, why not? A.I Z =Srkfd lce
❑ Will the proposed use have an adverse impact on housing and social
conditions, including a variety of housing unitypes and prices, and
neighborhood quality? If no, why not? ,c./o fF. ti'i %D►. Ve
4 — phgec^(, Sciszooci ea71- /6
( rgivf /hrJ V446 AAA R,ehvxv
( F�f S u 6/1 /h /St'Fz 4W4 C kr eeV
Ado S 7b k/4 - ,1,14 &E / opti6 /.I/'G'
9
March 2005
ATTACHMENT C
Student Population
• LI • H s 1 7 to Hwy 4 • • ,_�- wit:; 0 • • •• �' 4 f ount y �15
m �� c •
• D t
Heathro , 0 4 S • State Hwy 460
E • ~ , \� a
0
• , Airport
Legend d a• - t• •• • 0
l� / ' b ' ake Mary U
1 Mile Ma o • • � ., illi ' 3 Miles e n woo. • m
• • . 0 C • •
5 Miles ' a ♦ , ----- • � •• i , • •
E 0 '� i ;, • o
o0 0 0 ° N. oo N
o
13 O
i
A
/ `� u• ood Hills O d
8 y
g
m 90 Ng .
O u O late O
S oG State�y 434 B ® o o � S Nw 1
v.
. rd ®
O `' o Y 4 7 — •
90
O
O
yp r ,w 0 o 0 .E • tate Hwy 4
�0 0 00
a, rth O Charlolte m -'" o • 1 ....? •
•
m
�•E a • A o Serra% 0 0 0 0 'i sinter SPrin.s
• a = • \ Cerra o - o o 06) A \ , ��
Lake • .,
MI • Mi O • (/ + O O
V -0 1, O
6 ) O • ni
To • @ o •
\• • • •.o o 0 0 0
• • ®,`` Red Bug Lake 0 R Bug La';
• O O
State Hwy - • • C • e o 0
co e
m o
m
• m 2 r -+. m ell Branch c
.. .1 C oon a KefS iedy Lake • - i
�y Park ~, II • Mcculloch
_16. P- o
. tate Hwy 42 • • , 426 c ,
state , • Univ
1e N \
Mo - g versi ersity ersity
vi m i � � ��1� cc� Cady / .
Shader r a � M ake Sue co � ?'' State H m � J
' n
,.. m
o
C. rine State H ! A
a c
State u.4 5 % J i i P 1rIw ii 1111E1 MIA&
0 1.25 2.5 5 Miles
I I I I I I I I
EENTARY CHARTER SCHOOL
• WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
PROJECT DATA I -
PRIMARY HIERARCHY:
BUILDING BLDG. AREA SF RE 'D. PARKING PROVIDED PARKING PARKING CALC.
CHARTER SCHOOL (TWO- STORY) 50,000 SF 72 57 PAVED 1 PER STAFF (65 EST.) CENTRAL WINDS PARK _
34 UNPAVED PLUS 1 PER 100 STUDENTS (650) —
10+ STREET NO . '(� 9) _ rte'
434 S . R • POWER POLE
TOTAL 1D1+ i �O. 4J4 ��� —� CONCRETE
S R _ _ - CURS f.�
FORMER 50' RIW) - IDEWALKAND)
r NG `` E \
k _ - GREEN STRIP _ jmiL \
PARENT DROP-OFF ON SITE STACKING: 60 VEHICLES SHOWN. FLEXIBLE 0(PTIONS TO r � ��_ - 4 _, , " c ' � t — �A.� ^ , ,_'�
INCREASE STACKING BY USE OF DOUBLE-LOADING LANES AND ONSITE R - DIRECTION. _s- "` �a� , ,i' , ID WALK AND)
-- � .
• OUND SIG U E I.
1 L i
. -PI •AVEME ♦ STREE SI , P AR jf�� ;..,
UTILITY �. � W STRIP
BU � yOtP}C� {'
a ,.
,s
- -
-- ^« M, vP. .i .::,' <'.` t 1 ;r .,.. CHARTER SCHOOL "' -
- - HOL �-
/ V � �� vet, BUS � - TWO-STORY
., 1, \ \
-- „, ._....., f 4
tii .4, ,,, ,, 50,000 SF w r ° 0 v ROU
C e
t • ;T ' --- — S .� � � �� ..- FENCED PLAY AREA v�
r —i:-- T TT _
R4 34VI TA . - - `- -�
/� S -a ,' E�� - - — — _ � N Iws" ENTRY
_ ,,_ -= '- 'e=` „, RETENTION POND j? ) D; --.11
1 0 0OR SEATING , ' 1 �.i 4 r •' \ � ?i ...
I -- _� lrfT�A1q� 1 6 7 &., s 1 e 1f � 4 ' . L � ' � ST R�S ; t \ \ _ � -•-P AC L PARENT D i
■ �'�. TO N
F T a
�r'/ REMAIN j \
• �; ill
r c .
4
I � -- Rf0 V/pw ✓~ - �".. { !. . 6 7 9 10 10 11 0 , `- y y ..... ♦` \ (j)17. I FR S , \ r \ S 4 1� Rf� \ i
P _� 1 yy EXISTING TREES ... 1 '�..' 1 - n .,<r � E t • IR I .., � � A,,,,.. - -.°`. •^"rK O RE MAIN \ �
1 ( 1 ,� s Tq r E R - .ARC q ,,R _. vv '�
' i S ,,, T ,
N ` ( Rill, � g R / N 4 S.R. � _ ` '� r �, a TO IN : TREES ��j
�' Est 4 OPEN PARK AREA
1 0 1 u a- � T
\ I Y \
`_ ) SIGN iTVPJ n
% \ I � �, EXISTING TREES )
��. \ ; . [ � `3 � TO REMAIN ,,'..,' , \
i 0. .,‘„
A �' ` FI ' • ED VIEWS - a
- ,. (.` RE �T: T S ,E IN �: NTRAL • 5n ,,, ��
I . T P :O TO 'e i« . .�"'I
s >., ', 4 % MA T•EE TO EM - )
•0 : SP IA L . 0 e / g�
, 1 ~ \ S.R. 434 AND CENTRAL WINDS D ` , , w • � . S ' // I" ,... \c) 1
1,,. AID,. LANDSCAPED �� './ P�
GROUND SIGN .).44,44:444........
_ , -cc- b
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
g y POLE AND 80X
SURVEYOR'S NOTES
~ t �` 0 2 5 0 r-1--r"---71„ p»
BUSNESS CENTER C EI ED
, 130 MASTER SITE PLAN - D.1 bh
LAKE MARY, FL 32746 V
407.333 2005 d
Vvt „to„tti .�.
f G' °� -t .�•
AA0000233 11 Ye�� ! 2010.016 05.27.10
EF3 SPRIN( c
CT *tY Q - Chnev
ELEMENTARY CHARTER SCHOOL
• WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
cez • CIIIC PESSOKE
EX7/VarES=I
` CORNICE EXPRESMONS
V
_ ; '11 EXPRESSION LINE
11,1 #0.
••71lE„,,k1 • , I :: 7 11 4
NORTH ELEVATION (PRIMARY HIERARCHY - CENTRAL WINDS PARK)
yr " - • .• PR E
0".
CORNICE EXPRESSIONS
11" ' ;: • =
, 74.4
SOUTH ELEVATION
S.R 434 VISTAS TERSIENATE AND CONVERGE
*4,Z7 APPROXIMATELY AT TIM VOCAL TOWER
A CORNICE EXPRESSIONS
EXPRESSES A ow potesoir.
DININENx ORM. nflech•deammompl gm*SISIN EN *NEM 1* OA
afINSEIN Swam* Name malmEMNANIE. NEN mead MiNimlips.
iNNE .01.11 SWIM NEW AMMO N
le
EVIL k 5*
MESAS! RILES
PILE ENO .■ WEST ELEVATION (EASTBOUND S.R. 434 VIS1'A TERMINATION)
CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS bh
mcooyaz 2010016 0527 10
y=
a �
* `
e
# m
.i.,.,, y k
Y4 t - R :
y�pv
y
.Y .
m
. . --- .
1 !t X*
} ° ° 4 ''' \ 4,, i
r
'4°
I 4 - - . ';:;. ' ....' . . ,,,,, '‘ ''')I14
t
rr
ti _� : L ..- AIN.* ' ..„„,„„....:*.
~1e
f ____
'',4 ,,,, \ ' V4 ,,f f-,_ . \\ .:::, \'‘.:U1.4.-ic—\,.‘,,,,- . \ ‘-' -' ::i.,,,,.,,,12,,8, ''''''\ ,,,,, ,,,,
/
' 't ,..-; \ 0..
, \ , -, \\____----------' / ) ' '-,),;,...-,... ''.-
.4. : -,.N
: 0
4
- - , -,, ,,-.
- , '"*. ,, ,, — -.. - ' .k 041. Itli•• --,
...
*.,
..,,
Ags'
. ,..
..... .„.„,
...
,„.
,..--,- l'e
..._ „,.,„ . .,..„.„....,
..'''','' \ -- -7- 1 ''4' ; ' ' ' ' r l''. ..,-,:: : • '., . .....-
:
'`., oie,,,,,',
,••• .,:$..21
9' ,,' n'
.. .
1 4 k 7 .i 4 :' '' '.:v., ,.., ' '..:*" . . . .:" .'‘.0 ' ' -: ' '• 1 .4;;;* 41it
I
i
)
.
....
. ''' . _., ',ft'
/ 1 ,-
I-
,
. - ,...... . .,
.
' :7: ' •
- ,
4-
t
't 4
,
4
Or
5
'
55.
. '
f , P.
.....
t ... ,
f
I* 1 . , .
° `' f ... •
t '
t :
,., .
. ..
...
-,,
! ,
....„,
, ...,
,-,
,..
ATTACHMENT E
History
Choices in Learning was organized in 2000 and opened for school in 2001. The School
has been managed and run successfully for 9 full school years.
Choices in Learning received a 15 year Charter from SCPS.
Choices in Learning consistently is an A rated School
Choices in Learning is a high performing public school that has Board of Directors that is
responsible for the operation of the School. The Board of Directors is a combination of
parents and local business people in the community. They have dealt very effectively
with numerous challenges throughout the years such as hiring and firing Principals, the
unexpected death of another principal in mid -year, the unfortunate death of 3 children
while in the care of a dysfunctional parent, and relocation of the school in order to meet
the demand. The School has solid leadership.
Money and Economics
Financial Overview of the School 2009 -2010
• 2009 -2010 operating budget was $3.6 million
• Payroll and associated taxes was $2.0 million
• Revenue for procured services is $1.6 million
• 45 employees
• Most of the employees have 4 year degrees, some have masters degrees
• Finish the 2009 -2010 year at least $450,000 in the black.
• $1,350,000 of cash in the bank as of April 30, 2010.
• Finish the business year with $1,150,000 after modular expenses.
• No debt
Projected financial information of the School in 2011 -2012
• Projected operating budget will be $5.1 million
• Payroll and associated taxes will be $2.46 million
• Debt payment on new facility will be $700,000
• 60 employees (creation of 15 new jobs)
• Cash in the bank will grow steadily from today forward even with facility
payment.
Controls and Responsibility
The School is audited every year by a 3` Party CPA. The last three Annual Audit
Reports that were recorded in Tallahassee are included on the disk. Please contact the
auditor and check us out — James Moore and Company out of Daytona is the CPA firm.
Audits have always been very positive and the corrective recommendations noted by the
Auditors become part of the SOP.
The School employees a full-time business manager that oversees all of the daily
accounting and procurement activities. School also has an independent CPA review our
books each month.
The Board ensures the School runs in a fiscally responsible manner.
The Project
Choices in Learning has a solid financial position.
The project will be funded with permanent financing through bond issue. The IDA
granted approval May 19, 2010
The overall Project Value (land, design and construction, FF &E) is expected to be $8.5
million.
Debt Service Coverage Ratio remains well above 1.1 and cash in the bank will in excess
of seven figures.
Path Moving Forward
Concept Approval
Special Exception
Development Agreement
Start Designing