HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004 08 23 Regular 503
COMMISSION AGENDA
ITEM
503
CONSENT
INFORMA TIONAL
PUBLIC HEARING
REGULAR X
August 23, 2004
Meeting
MGR. rv:EPT Jff
Authorization
REQUEST:
The Community Development Department recommends approval of the proposed
architectural rendering for the building on lot 5 at the Tuskawilla Office Park (TOP),
subject to the Dover Kohl & Partners comments.
PURPOSE:
The purpose of this agenda item is to consider and approve the new proposed
architectural rendering for the building on lot, subject to the Dover Kohl & Partners
comments. A typical building elevation was approved with the final engineering plans
for the TOP. On April 12, 2004, the City Commission approved an architectural
rendering for this lot, subject to Dover Kohl's comments. The applicant proposes an
alternate design/rendering, Any deviation from the approved design requires City
Conmlission approval.
APPLICABLE LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY:
Sec. 20-321. Administration.
Sec. 20-327. Architectural Guidelines.
Ordinance No. 2003-43
CHRONOLOGY:
February 11,2002 - City Commission approves final engineering/site plan and
development agreement for the TOP (including typical
architectural renderings for one and two story buildings).
April 14, 2003 - City Commission approved architectural renderings for buildings I
and 6 at the TOP.
August 23,2004
Regular Item 503
Page 2
July 28, 2003 -
City Commission approved architectural renderings for building 11
at the TOP.
March 8, 2004 -
City Commission approved architectural rendering for building 7
at the TOP.
April 12,2004 -
City Commission approved architectural renderings for buildings 5
and 9 at the TOP
June 23,2004 -
City Commission approved architectural rendering for building 8
at the TOP
FINDINGS:
1. Staff believes the proposed renderings are more aesthetically appealing that the
typical renderings approved on the final engineering plans.
2. The City Commission approved similar renderings at its April 14, 2003, July 28,
2003, March 8, 2004, April 12, 2004, and June 28,2004, meetings, subject to
Dover Kohl and Partners' comments,
3. James Dougherty, of Dover Kohl and Partners, the City's Town Center
consultant, has reviewed the architectural renderings and although finding them
generally consistent with the Town Center Code's, provided comments for minor
modifications.
ST AFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the proposed renderings, subject to Dover KoW & Partners
comments.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Approved architectural rendering
B. Proposed architectural rendering
C. Dover Kohl & Partners correspondence
D. Previous Dover Kohl & Partners correspondence
COMMISSION ACTION:
S:\dept - Community Development\Planning\2004\Commission\082304COMMRegular503TOP
#5 Archi tecturalRenderingRevision, doc
ATTACHM~NtA
~
Ul
0..:-
.
to
, -" -
r - - - -
I 11110
- :::" .'"' """""> . :. <"<.C;'c :<.
......:.;
- ......:.1...:.::,<,.
") - ". F::.':',::'..:.:..
I == "-,,
~ (:.I~ II
- , "
- - I.:>. .:.,... . ----
- ." +.:..::>......::
-
- - - - .:.;.<'.:> ";':::
- - - - .'. ':::.: :.""'"'.;'":.::: .:'::.::;.
- - - - -
- - .r- I I 0
- - -
-
. .:..:....:.:. :",:'c'"":.: ...::.....:.,:..
- - - 1=
- 0 L'
u
-
I I
- -
== .~ '.': ",,'. ":::'.';':. "
-
I ,~ I D
- . "'.::. ;:'.....:..:<: ."
""..:":. ~,::. ..:.'..
". "'.
- - ."'"'::
::".: //
~ -
- .,<
- //
- :.:":
- - :: .,'
= .::' 7-:<""": .'.
- - :.:.: ::: .
- ..:;.::;:.> c;:.':>.,
I a~' I D
-
- 1::= - -~ - :.:..::...".:.: .c.:,.....:.:::..:..
== - - -
- - 011_/ i I
-
- - -
-
"::;..7.:7:."'.:':."..
- I 11110
- - - K
- 1= I:' ..:.:. . '.'::. :::c.'
..:: '+ ::: ::.
- - - "".,"::.:.
(;'.' .' //
~~t. II
~=z=J
I==~.\ _.
- ".. .":::
:"f::-::'.:.::<::; ,..c
- ".::: '.' .....
- - .:. :: . c.~::.:..
- ....c ,.; :c> "'.; :cc' :.'.
I I 0
=~~tN.Y
l'OOtOCl(' lJ)$5
(r'~-8J ~
-
"SIOf'*Al'.
(JUl~"""ll
N
t
.'>.a:_lt
'j:-...c:(fYII)
ACC[SS RAMP - CURBED AR!:A
\lStUCIlC:;s*-'l,'.IU'J<.-'"
....O.~I...I(~._."""
'''"'
SCALE: 1~ ... 30'
----
o JO
,'WOOf_1:(
'~(""l
. HANDICAPPED PARl<INC STALL
L~YOUT (NTS)
rl(DOImI[(FUV~PSl.6.OEtP) ~t...
.,..." ...... ..............
{("fti
:"""1" "L~
gf
~.
~~~
~..~
~;_i
..,.
. ",
e;:!:tll
~:~
SIJ7"OZ';lQ'E IIZ!I.20.
!
~.
~
~
110 COIIPACltD SU8(:JfAD( (TO 98: T-180)
S- S':Il eo.tNl UAst COURSE. 118~ iIIlN. CQw1lol,CTlQN
r;. 1-1/2~ T'I'Pt: 5~1II "'SPMAll-,SlJRr.f.CX COURSE
I / 60T. IZoW cQ.;C. ItlSBQH CtJ~ .,EREI ~ SlOC~"'I.K
S . 120 SlAe. SUa-9.t,S( COHrll(l)
. lJNotA R1allON CORa (lYF') '.
. ~ a~~ ! t
i'j ~;ei ~ f ~
g I V! ~ a t
~i d , ~
ga~ ~ !
a .
~~ . n' ,. "
.. N.t!
~
PAvrM~~~ }~?o~~~CTION
JAMES C. BRANCH, P.E.
CtNSUl TING CIVIL ENGINEER
2130 E. HYDE DRIVE
DEL TONA. n. 32738
PHONE &. FAX "'(.386) 57<4-2830
e moll: jlmbronchOmpinet.net
TUSKAWlllA OFFICE'". PARK
'MNTER SPRINGS., SOilNOlE COUNTY, FlORIDA
SITE
DIMENSION
PLAN
~".-1,
.t,c PAil[
'T'OC><....._
""__'.IIl<::r.,um
_.......'....I;UIII
DEVELOPER:
TUSKAWJLLAOfFlCE PARK. LLC
800 W.' S.R. <426, SUITE E
OVIEDO, rL .32765
PHONE ("07} 9?1-200<4, FAX (407) 971 2005
SHEET 6 OF 9
SEPTEtJBER 4, 2001
=-~=.D<I(
MOUNTABLE CURS (FOOT
- TYPE A INDEX JOO)
(N1S) . .
TYPICAL PA\!fMENi PARKING ISLAND,
~~
SCAlC ,. . 10'
< 0t
')~c, ~
~~I
\\)
LoT ~ 5
28 YR. ARCHTEC~ ROOF
SHINGLEs. INSTFU.ATION l!o
FASTENING SPECS BY Ml'NJ-
FACT1.I<ER. SHFLL COMP\.. y
WITH FBC-2OO1
~
IDC1UlED
OVER coc.
~
FI'Pl.Ill.E
'J' STlJ' FIlCIHl
Fl.L EX1'ERlOR DOCJlS
FRONT FI F'WTIlW
SCALE: 1/ ~"'1'-Q"
-rvstq~ ;~l~
o rf\ie P""r~
I<EYSTCtE IE All
g'
6'
Ix>
7'
...
PRE-f'AB LClNEREO SHUTTERS
(CONTRACTOR TO SUl/'\IT SHJP
Dli!AWINGS ~ TO FABRICATION:
>
~,
~
>
(]
==
~
~
~
~
0=
ATTACHMENT C
Aug-12-04 04:35P Dover. Kohl & Partners
305 666 0360
P.Ol
DOVER, KOHL & PARmERS
tOwlI planning
Memorandum
To:
John Raker
City of Winter Springs
Victor Dover
I!RU!~He ~ ~ VIE IT)
[,: AUG 1 3 2004
Cc:
From: James Dougherty
,
L'. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
'. Current Planning
Date: 11 Aug, 2004
Subject: Comments regarding the Tuskawilla Oftlcc Park elevation fhr lot #5
Comments:
}, As with the previous buildings sent for our review, we would prefer a building with a true
raised tlnish floor. The look of a raised finish floor appears to he somewhat accomplished
here, however. with the 2" stucco window base molding,
2. We S~e no other specific problems wltll the elevation sent for review.
Apr-05-04 11:47A Dover, Kohl & Partners 305 666 0360
ATTACHMENTD
DOVER, KOHL &: PARTNERS
town planning
P.Ol
Memorandum
To: John Baker
City of Winter Springs
From: James Dougherty
RECEIVED
APR ~ 5 2004
\,
Date: 5 April, 2004
: CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS !
L . Current Planning ....J
Subject: Tuskawilla Office Park- Bldg elevation comments
John,
Regarding the Thskawilla Office Park elevations sent for our review on April t:
-;:--.
1. The buildings look very low and slab-on-grade. They should have either a raised
finish floor or, at the minimum, a water table line to give the building a visual base,
;7> 2, The first elevation (with the pilasters) should have a more substantial cornice. The
cornice looks too thin compared to the heavy pilasters.
~
3. The shutters on the double windows at each end of the second elevation are too small
to real istically be able to cover the window surfaces. Shutters, if provided, should be
sized to fit the windows. For this reason, shutters should often be avoided on elevations
with double windows.
Please call with any questions.
-James