HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004 01 12 Regular 501
City Commission
AGENDA
ITEM 501
CONSENT
INFORMATION J
PUBLIC HEARING
REGULAR X
January 12. 2004
Meeting
~ ;/)/
MGR. DEPT.
Authorization
REQUEST: The Community Development Department requests that the City Commission
reconsider a request by Dr. Pete Corum for a 3 foot variance from the 10 foot setback
requirement of Section 20-486 of the City Code of Ordinances, to authorize a new monument
sign to be constructed within the SR 434 Redevelopment Overlay Zoning District.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this agenda item is to consider a request by Dr. ,Pete Corum for a
variance from Section 20-486 of the City Code of Ordinances to allow him to replace his
existing non-conforming pole sign with an illuminated monument sign at 620 West SR 434.
Given the office building setback from the SR 434 right-of-way and the building roof
overhang, the proposed location is the best location on the site for the monument sign.
However, Staff believes that the proposed signage is too massive visually for the allowable
space and needs to be reduced to a 6' height as a condition if the variance is granted.
APPLICABLE CODE:
Sec. 20-82. Duties and Powers; general. (Board of Adjustment)
The Board of Adjustment shall make recommendations to the City Commission to grant any
variance or special exception as delineated in this chapter.. . as will not be contrary to the public
interest where, owing to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the provisions of this
chapter will result in unnecessary and undue hardship... . In order to recommend any variance
from the terms of this chapter, the board of adj ustment must and shall find that the request
meets all 6 criteria. . .
Sec. 20-103. Restrictions upon lands, buildings and structures. (c) Percentage of occupancy.
Sec. 20-486. Signs. (2) Ground mounted single-tenant identification sign:
One (1) wide-based monument style permanent project identification sign shall be permitted
per single-tenant parcel. . .
@)
January 12,2004
Regular Item 501
Page 2
a. Shall only advertise one (1) person, firm, company, corporation or major enterprise
occupying the premises.
b. Shall be located no closer than ten (10) feet from the front. side or rear property lines.
c. Shall not exceed two (2) faces.
d. Sign copy area shall not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet per face...
e. Shall be consistent in design, format and materials with the architecture of the proposed
building.
f. The sign shall not be more than eight (8) feet in height above the closest driveway or
vehicular use area.
g. Signs shall be in an enclosed base a minimum width of two-thirds (2/3) the width of the
sign. Landscaping shall be incorporated around the base to include low growing shrubs
and ground cover and/or annuals to promote color.
Sec. 20-486. Signs. (5) Additional Signs/Variances:
... The board of adjustment shall recommend variances of this sign code in specific cases where
such variances will not be contrary to the public interest and where, due to special conditions, a
literal translation of this sign code would result in unnecessary hardship. All requirements,
procedures, findings and appeals of sign code variances shall follow those provisions for
. .
ZOnIng vanances.
CONSIDERATIONS:
1). On November 10, 1997, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 683, which, among
other things, created the SR 434 Redevelopment Overlay Zoning District. It also set forth
standards for signage and provided a 5-year maximum amortization period for signs that were
not in compliance with the new standards.
2). On June 12,2000, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 2000-17, which provided
that any sign, other than a billboard, could be amortized and maintained until November 14,
2002. At or prior to November 14,2002, all nonconforming signs were to be removed and
may be replaced with signs that conform to the design standards set forth in the S.R. 434
Redevelopment regulations. All directly affected property owners were notified at or about the
time Ordinance No. 2000-17 was adopted.
3). As a reminder of the up-coming deadline, on July 26,2002, the former Community
Development Director Charles Carrington sent out letters to each property owner with a sign in
either of the SR 434 districts.
4). The subject site at 620 W. SR 434, is located at the northwest corner of Bombay and SR
434. The property has a C-1 Zoning, a Commercial Future Land Use designation, and is
located within the SR 434 Redevelopment Overlay Zoning District.
5). The applicant proposes to replace an existing non-conforming sign with a new monument
sign as required by code.
January 12, 2004
Regular Item 501
Page 3
6). The existing site includes two one-story office buildings. The buildings have nice
architecture which includes an extended roof overhang. A courtyard space between the two
buildings is enclosed by a wall to the south which runs parallel to SR 434. The wall and
landscaping adds to the appearance of the site. The buildings are setback only IT from the
existing SR 434 ROW line; the wall is only II' from the SR 434 ROW however does not run
the full length of the building. These create major constraints in locating the monument sign.
FINDINGS:
1). On or about October 9, 2003, the variance application (incomplete abutters list) was
received by the City.
2). The Applicant proposes to replace the existing non-conforming pole sign with a monument
sign. The applicant is requesting a location that would encroach 4 feet into the applicable 10'
sign setback, because ofthe extension of the base; the majority ofthe sign (copy area)
encroaches only by 3'. The applicant contends that, given the location ofthe building and wall
that there is no place in the SR 434 ROW for a monument sign that would not be in conflict
with the 10 foot setback [from the property line] requirements.
3). The Board of Adjustment at its regularly scheduled meeting of November 6, 2003, voted 3-
1 to recommend that the variance be granted, citing the limitation of space given the IT
building setback.
4). The Commission heard the Applicant's request on December 12 and denied the request for
the variance; however, the Commission then instructed Staff to bring this item back after
reviewing alternatives that might be in the best interest of the applicant and the SR 434
corridor.
5). The City Manager and Staff visited the site and unanimously agreed that given the site
constraints that encroachment into the 10' setback was necessary given the site constraints.
6). Staff concurs that the location determined by the Applicant, is the best location for the sign
given the site constraints, the architecture of the building and the roof overhang.
7). However, in recommending the 3' variance, Staff recommends the following relating to the
proposed monument sign:
The overall height of the sign be reduced from 8' maximum to 6' maximum. The sign
as currently proposed is too massive for the space allowed. Reducing the total volume
ofthe sign will cause it to better fit within the space available. (This reduction in
height probably will not affect the actual copy area or size of lettering that is proposed.)
The base of the sign is not to extend out beyond the copy area but is to be flush, given
the lack of setback space.
8). The 3' variance is the minimum variance that can be reasonably achieved.
January 12,2004
Regular Item 50 1
Page 4
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ACTION:
At its regular November 6, 2003, meeting, the Board of Adjustment voted 3-1 to recommend
approval of the variance. The majority felt that the request met the variance criteria.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Commission grant the 3' variance request, but only if the
overall height ofthe sign is reduced (from 8' maximum) to 6' maximum height and the base of
the sign does not extend out beyond the copy area. Given these considerations, Staff believes
that granting the variance will not undermine the Code, nor be injurious to the neighborhood,
or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare.
ATTACHMENTS:
A - Variance application & map
B - Picture/rendering of signage
C - Board of Adjustment draft minutes
CITY COMMISSION ACTION:
." \. .,
...--'~ ~
N~J ATTACHMENT A
~/~" "eo
~ ..' !See' .
.BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APptICATI01l 0 n 2003
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS OCl ~
1126 EAST STATE ROAD 4.'34 iERSPRINGS
WINTER'SPRINGS, F'L .32708'~2799. cliY~o':,~~_oagmane
.(407)327-1800 P
FOR:
r
v.
.........1.
SPECIAL EXCEPTION
VARIANCE
'CONDITIONAL USE
ADMINISTRATIVE DECISiON
APPLICANT: /j,n .G a/~hYJ)j),/}J.,),f?4"PHo.NEP7_' dr:2?-07c9;/
.ADDRESS: ,,~. tV. :512 /;1.3 1/ 4:/,.wr&'/" /7! .3':;'7t)~
cT. ;t>~~i/~
CT-
~3, ATTACH A copy OF THE PARCEL SURVEY.
',--- 4. ATTACH AN 11 x 17 MAP SHOW ING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND
SURROUNDING PARCELS.
~5. ATTACH LEGAL'DESCRIPTION.
'----. 6, TAX. PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER i.5 y..-z-'--o-'~'D-- S-/O. - ~oo
'--. 7. LOCATION 'OF PARCEL (street Address. and/or .:Nea,rest Cross
Streets): 'tJ-:3 SLy 73l..tn?.by AVE" . ,7
-....., a. PRESENT ZONING: C-I
FUTURE LAND 'USE: COm~ l::f"/b 161;..
By Signing belO~'I u'nderstand that City of Hinter Springs Officials
roay enter upon my property to inspect that portion, as relates to
this applicacion;
(If the applicant is not the 'o~ner of the subject property, the
applicant must' attach a letter of authorization signed by the
owner) .
PERSbNS ARE ADVISED ~HAT, IF THEY DECIDE TO APPEAL ANY,'bECISIONS
MADE AT THESE HEE,T INOS'/HEARINGS, THEY W I-LL .NEED A. RECORD or THE
PROCEEDiNGS AND FOR SUCH PURPOSE, THEY ~ILL NEED TO INSURE THAT A :
VERBATIM'RECORD OF THE .PRdc~EDrNGS IS MADE, 'AT'THEIR 'COST, WHICH:
INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND'EVIDENCE UPON HHICH THE APPEAL IS TO 'BE .,I~
BASED, PER SECTION 2B6.010~, FLORIDA STATUTES"
....1.,
SECTION 20-84 - APPEALS FROM DECI~IONS OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
(1) Any person, or persons, jointly or severally ~girieV8d by
any decision of the Board of Adjustment may, \.Iithin thirty (30)
days after the filing of any decision in the office of the Board of
Adj\istment, but not thereafter, appl y to' th.e' Ci ty Counci 1, tor
administrative r,elief, After a. hearing.before the City Council an
aggrieved party may, within thirty' (30) days after the decision of
the City' Council, fil e an appeal. with a court of competent
jurisdic~ion over the ~ubject matter..
. "".clf,;'
,
"
...... . ---...--::' .
ATTACHMENT A:
APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS
'A staH~ 'Report will be 'developed for each Application. The
Applioant should be 'prepared to addres:s eaoh of the issues provided
below fo.~ Variance r.equ.ests.
,.
'In %r~~r to grant a variance, the.aoard of ~djustment must ~ake the
fbllowing findin~s of fact: ~. f
. . 1. That specia~"conditions and clrcumstances exist whi~ are
peculiar to the I and. structures or bui IdiMs "invol ved and
whioh are' not aplilioable to other lands. structures or
bUUdi~as in the same. zanina .distr:ict. ! Pt./e:. 70 PeM,,'T.lc.,thMS
()~ Ih~..,()b...... ::J1t>~.A.J~ IP ./Je at/owed ~"...!~r b-',,-
2. That 'special 'eon-d~.tions and' oircumstances do noti r~sul t
t~om the ,otions of the applioant. .' .
3. rhat e~antfna the varianoe requested will not confer on.
the applicant any speohl pdvileae, that is denied by this
chaptet to other lands. buildine~ or structures in the same
'zontne..distriot. -rHo 'IS r><~ i?PA'Y' ;'~,.uJ..';;,t</6 ./~ ~~
/JeE:1/- 'T"+Mr u:>,,~ IJ.. . /!.€<iCl"!.e... b./ S eriJ/k~
4.. . That.. litera~ interpretation of the provisions of this
chapter would' d'epdve' the appl icant of dehts commonl y en ioyed ;,
by. other properties in. the' saT\)e zonina distriot under toe
ter's of t ~ c i tet' n ~ould wor ecessar hardso' on
the applioant. f'/~J .6ee,u /1 /!e..!..,,:(e/1;r ,,47'" "/'.,(4Ce-r.le.><--/
!YJK:;z.O ye'C~ ,;t/eai'g~"C!~"'?-I~rm./ 7? /l./60 ct42-~
eM /{A.x:..e.. t4~rer...c.s oE' ~ p?~~e/..-y
5. T t he .r a ce a ed is the i u ad nee tha t
will make possible' the reasonable use of the' land, builcliM 'or
struoture. C /~/1 ~ 71'.-/ 'rG21JdB.rr, c:v)~ l77e~
12 e"2S """",'tJJ.e UJ'e ,c--i-' A..E. 'lcr:.. ti. ,bu-"..t.,tJ/L--J::::>,
6... That the arant 'of the varianoe wil'! be. in'harmony with toe
qenera'~, intent and purpose of ,this chapter. wi II not. be
in1Urious to the neiahborhood. or otherwise detrimental to tne
publicwel fare. O).?;";/'w/~~ 'erJ'A!,tJ:ix;';"~ /J/'dPerT/
., c!5~ ~. 'q ~ J.?~;1<y- V~
7, The request must be consistent with, the obiectives and'
policies of the Comprehensive ~la~..
f ,~.e,L.e//e.. 7Pl/J W///' /?1e~ c04.r'<8:z~k..s
THE APP~' ICANT IS'RESPONSIBLE ~OR PROVIDING THE CITY WITH,THE NAMES
AND .AD RESSES OF ~ACH PRQPERTY OWNER, W I-TH IN' 150 FT, OF EACH
PROPERT. LINE BY THE SCHEDULED TIME, . .'
I. ", . .
THE APP~ICANT IS RESPONSiBLE TO POST THE BLUE NOTICE CARD ON THE I
SITE AT' LIi:AST SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE .BOARD OF :ADJUSTMENT MEETING ..' ,[
.' AT HHICH'THE'Jo1ATTER WILL BE CONSIDERED: SAID.NOTICE SHALL NOT BE'"'
POSTED WITHIN THE CITY RIGHTS-OF~WAY. . .
o ',ef9;,;...A.J6TCJV Co!?"ur-e;-' (j)w~,vre~ .~/~ eL.~~-
6~ Ge.t,l3'1 ,@ U!~r~'~'J.,1f.
td/,or~r ~ -# ..
.' ~<17~ '3~7_ 9S'eot:I ,. !.:...., . ',,;
. cD . ~~..;,...~1. (J/'A~n~/fJ.i9!./.! ~~'7i~~~e;1r4/.;~~/cc:jt
?oO I '~IE ~S Y' . . . . ."
'-LJ 1 '" . ....e" __~ :--r'.d . .'. .4\,f TO,,?::,/)" U/iJr 4'
au/.ur~Y"~.....,.-, " 't/. ,.... .
Cj), ilJ~ ~/~. .stlJlk;U/~., . ' ~~"u~~'~f~J'07
"~2- 5/2 <,!,,,<tL d .... "A
~
r
,,/'
/?~P~tKd~, -liJe~
~~6 0..3
:: ,~=
~ ~-g-
o. 2~
- co 0
= ~CD
~ 6 ~-'
CQ ~6~
.g ~.~~.
.~ '(5.2
. co 5 ~
~ ~j
C; ~tD
- ~....,
., o~
a co
W ..., ~
> CI irlll
~ ~~
- CT) ~~
W C'I z~ '
o ' Z~:' ~'g'
W => :5:
~ ~
~ (3
8--
APPROVED PfiOVIDED INFORfVlAiWN r-..-'
, PRESENTED ON THIS APPlICAnuN ~ ..c...... ...~ \. . .'
rnQ)EAND'C~ORRE T.. .... . >.
DATE: " ,fO~ ..' .
S~Gf~ED:/ - -, ~~~
[<<- ~--- . jl.
I P
DElfT A&. OffiCES
14 SPACES. 9' '
~ 8PACES 0 e'
H
'<
w~
Os
_lo.
Z u..
< :E u..
~'::;) 0
a:
w 0
i- (,)
<0
'SI'TE
Pl
A
:::
>
~
~
>
"'...... ...c.' n.
... .. '" w =
~ >- .Vt :
-< ' I
:z ::
..' ~'= ~
.. .:
.. : J
.:.: .- 0 ~
:.9 1~ ii
. ,... .. . :r 0
~'
,.... . ~
<- >
..J
eel;
%
~:
Z...
Wfl,
Ci
~
BOMBA Y AVENUE
.
Tl-lIS SOLU,TION PROVIDES A TOTAL
OF ;l(z) PARKING SPACeS AND REQUIRES
APPROX 2~(z) 5F OF ADDITIONAL
PAVING,IN T',..lE 5OUTI-l EAST CCFiNER
Lo1 A',....f k-e.- eA-5f k Df UK.b ~ AU- of (,0-(' e l ' J? ~ (Mp) of a... ..
~lJ\ ~l.:$)\. '~ Lor (p) B Wc...K. /g' (LM. &. U) T,<6 8LOc...K ( 9 J of 100 ~
Ov-\.~ I u>-r to ) ~LOc...K ~) t-.c\' I{ f6 loU<.- ~ ~ h..c,T 13
fb~ ~ + N&1'-rL ,Olll~&...c 1rr ~~~ I pucr /b-$,DK. I~
~ ~h' P~BVlCA ~s O+Se...vvu.~t.e.. ~
....
.,
e e.
. ....
-. .~'
InN
~~ ~~ ~1
~~ ~I ~~
" ~11:
~~l~ '
"'l~"~
~
r- . I
. I .,.: I "
lie 2'1' :1.
. '0. 0' ' :!:
"U: ~ .: n
o . I/O, ,
tn: ~,w ~ -:1:
-. <: C ..'
~.:~ ::1)1--4
~~o <-<:a ~
~g~ ~g:o ~.
OllO~' 0 tn:t '~
>~::J':-m, ~
~ 0 mz ~ ~
;; n - ~
<0 ., ",I~
o tS
>
't) 'TI ~
~~OO~
'=":>cco
~r-z~.." "-
~ 00.. ~
~'~ ~
~ ~
I~
~
"
.......,
2)
c
n
I
I\)
(JI
I
G)
01
7J m
CD
0'
.,,:t 0 11 '...
CDo n a 0\'
3~ -I 2)
~~ c:::t 1ft ::I
"?'~ (Q -
0(11 (,
0>:;1] r4 "
10(1)
3-0 c:::t .
lD:;I] c:::t 11
i'z c.a .
G>
en 0
0
;0
c:
:I
"
, ,'3
~~
~ .
,~
~
/VORTH'
0.4' ,
,~
, I
r
~.s'.s: 00'
--.
~~
~l'
~~
~~
.
..
.
~ - -,~"o'
/~ ~~ I ~, / fr,ut' ~.4.
~ ~~'~~, ,C4MHE~l
, 0 4U/L~&
~ :;,
50
.
"
~
~
~
to
:!\,
".
. "
~ .
~\
~
..
~
,~
t!)~
..
~~
, 8.1:
~~
'. .:- -/1" '"
:.-11
AJ'.P#ALT /}/RONd AREA
I
1\
I~
~, 17l["
'~ it!.
~ -
<.\ 17.-" I
~ ~l
~ ~"<'
" .
.,~;
.... .: f
."
. ......~-:.-- :.~:
;..- to
. '.
,. .'- , .
:~f i
. ... 4.
-J--~ "~
'" .. ,
~
~
~~
.. ..
'~
,~
~~\
~(.a~
~...~
~'~ ~
~ ..
~
,
, ,
S" _ '
...
'0
..
K ~ gi~
' ~ JI; i ;.
~'~~~
~ ;i~~ t-
o !~~ "r
c ~-...
::r; ~~i' .
~ ~~i -
n ~~_
, ~ >-~~,
~~'~
~~~ ,
~,g
~'~
~..
I~
~~
~' ~,r 2
rb'
L~,r ..3
....
-,
-.. c-
NORTH
Z()~r,'
>
~
~
>
~
=
~
~
~
~
>
801Jf84Y
AJ/f
lI:SCRIPTIO'l: Lot "N' & East 1{2 - bf Lot ".11'. and aU of Lot "E", Block "26" A subdivision of'
Lot 6, Block "Ill", and. Lot 8 BloCk "19";- NOROI OIlLANro: Lot 10, Block -"24, Lot II 1llock "25"
and Lot 13 Block "26" of NORIH 0RUNIl:J lSf AlIDI:T!lN, Semnole County, Florida, as ~cl
in Plat Book 12, Page 86, PlhIic Records of Seminole County" Florida, mOleparticu1arly
descri bed as foU""s: Lots I, Z & the South 40.00_ feet of 1Dt" 3~ Block "27". I<<lRIll 0RLANlX)
Il11f ADDlTIGl. as recorded in Plat Book 14, Page 9, Plillic Ileconls of Seminole County, . Florida.
AND' . . . _ '.
The North 3S. 00 feet of Lot 3. Block "27", NORIll 0RLANr0 RIll ADDITIO'l, as reconled in Plat:
Book 14. Page 9. Public Records of Semi..,le <nUlty, Florida., aild- subject to easements ani!-
' res trictions of record. ,
~ ~ /-
~~
,~
1
--.J
,~--?-/~&"
,-'
'ON 3' H
'-
..
--
--
"'....-
Qel () q 1~n3
E,? S?R\.l'lGS
11 Or IJ'i\NI.oagmane
C\ ?ertnit\\(1Q
ATTACHMENT A:
(
I ,...,
j "
I
I
ATTACHMENT A:
~.l,
~.'.: I'
\ ATTACHMENT A: I
;,,:.
\
ATTACIlMENT A: \
I'""'"
I
[I'~', '.,-'
. "
, ,
r/
!
"
---
.....
',;:.::..,..../
~l
)a
,
( -
~
I
,
~
~
~
~
. .
i~ (()
-'%j
l ~/?(. .
ih~
. .
N 446 t!~ I .,;tt!' If ~ 11.1,./ t/ I
'\ .
~
,
~L'
'I.... -~
.....~b. .. '11-_
ATTACHMENT A:
--,-p
I
___ _ 6
- ,
",,~ -', ~ ~ . -: . ~, . ":>
- "'" " "0 '
j' -:: ' ..... > 101
. ., .', " _ I a
, -,.... I
t'-l
· ~,r.
7. ,f
Ii
. - Ii ,
A'~~s.1)t)
~'j'-\'71
~ . JI'J,J~ # Ii t*
I
I
I
~ Q ~ ~. \. : \
.~ ~ ~, ~
~ ~ ~
. .. ~ ~~. ~ ~ ;
.. .! \-., ~ ~ ... . 11-1'
. ~ ' I
, I
I
1-
.
.
,
-
I
r
~~4
.
"
~
~12- 4~4.-~
~
- -..... J
I
!
J . ~ \
· cG~: 1":::- I '-0"
~
-.1..
~
~.,
.- .. ---
., _ -..... _ JJII-~
,: ....
t
4~,
f
f~p~~D L,OCb-ilOf...\ ~
s-r p..~
~l-O tJ\. M ~ C7~ k
.
~' V~MJc..e. ~V\
C:?fZ- 4:?4 .MJ D J:-
tl~bl--{-r ~t1D(L~
lI.J -rH~ ~~ ()P
1tte. ~t61JJ.
(fOOLJH6t ~~
10 ~ P~H
'N'1'J..t ~l61fJ.)
.
>
~
~
>
(]
=
~
~
~ .....~
~
0=
..
LD CATI CJ N
-
~:.
[it,c-,
i
bf7PHCJxN-r'? yz.eG U~T-
D.F. ILLUMINATED SIGN AT PROPOSED
""
/
/
//
D.F.ILLUMINATED MONUMENT SIGN 5/8"=1'-0"
. ALUMINUM CONSTRUcnON,..2' ALUM. ANGLE FRAME.._09O' ROUTED ALUM FACES...063' FlliER
" . INTERNAl FLUORESCENT IliUMINATION HIGH OUTPUT lAMPS AND BAllAST .
. PREOSION ROUTED AlUM. FACES WIllS' GREEN (2030) ACRYlJC BACK-UP
. MAIN OUllNETTO BE FAUX STUCCO PAINTED TO MATCH SW.2425
. DECORAllVE SI;jROUD AND RASE COVER FAUX STUCCO PAINTED TO MATCH PORTER PAINTS 7044-4'
. ENGINEERED SUPPOIrr STIEl AND FOUNDATION
· UL USTING AND.DISCONNECT SWITCH
HruCJ>.NT's Fe& \JesT.
.eN
S Y S T E MS
.'
/
/
I
...-
ll< eon."
--
'012
..,.."
032B50
AS NOlED
L_
1 6/5/03
,1.=31.92lS'IJt~..
. OP~
I
II
d
>
~
~
>
~
=
~
~
Z
~
c=
..
,.-...
I'~:'
.' ~&.
." .>to:
~<t~';:.
~;;.:.
..~?k;}f1t~~~ii,:ij7swe~i~!t1~s~~
..'
~~F'? ~Mt-'\ 15.1'\ tJ~T(ON-
D.F. ILLUMINATED SIGN AT PROPOSED LOCATION
'1' '?E::-r~ 1t> 1/-JU-VPe ~j lt~bH"r Of:>c:7160 J2eDtJce.o 11>- {p'_On MA.X.
, (r:p.m;t p..pr~. B' -0")
>
~
~
>
(j
=
~
~
~
~
Cd
..
ATTACHMENTC:
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
MINUTES
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
REGUlAR MEETING - NOVEMBER 6, 2003
PAGE 4 of6
B. Dr. Pete Corum Requests A Variance To Allow A Monument Sign Within The
10' Sign Setback Set Forth In Section 20-486., For His Office At 620 West State
Road 434. , '
. (
Mr. John Baker, AICP, Senior Planner, Community Development Department, read the
request for a variance sign setback stating, "Staff has looked at this and do not see any
way that we can recommend approval. Also, the staff does not see that they meet the six
(6) criteria for the varianc~, Therefore, the staffhas to recommend denial."
Dr, Pete Corum, 620 West State Road 434, Winter Springs, Florida 32708, represented
by Kenneth Soday, US Identity Group: Presented pictures of the new sign which is
permitted, j~st ,does not meet the setback. It fits the criteria other than the 10 foot
setback. The building is only 16 feet back from the edge of the right-a-way; from the
sidewalk itself. Dr. Corum has owned and operated his business from this same location
for twenty (20) years. The new sign ordinance has put a hard ship on him to replace the
existing sign.
Discussion.
(
Board Member Tackaberry stated, "I personally feel we should convey to the City
Commissioners that this is one of several, and maybe they should reconsider so that other
people do not have to go through all of this. Maybe change the footage with the existing
buildings. "
"I WOULD MOVE - THAT WE - RECOMMEND THAT THEY GRANT - DR
CORUM - A VARIANCE - TO AUTHORIZE THE NEW MONUMENT SIGN TO
BE CONSTRUCTED CLOSER THAN 10 (TEN) FEET FROM STATE ROAD 434
RIGHT-OF-WAY WITHIN THE STATE ROAD 434 REDEVELOPMENT
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT." MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER
TACKABERRY. SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER DILLER.
DISCUSSION,
Board Member Diller recommended an amendment to state - 7 feet from the base.
"I WOULD LIKE TO AMEND THAT TO READ 7 FEET FROM THE BASE,
FROM THE RIGHT-A-WAY." MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER,
TACKABERRY. SECONDED BY BOARD :I.\1EMBER DILLER.
VOTE:
BOARD MEMBER TACKABERRY: AYE
CHAIRMAN WATERS: NAY
BOARD MEMBER DILLER: AYE
BOARD MEMBER HERBERT: AYE
MOTION CARRIED.
j