The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2003 10 27 Public Hearings 403 First Reading - Ordinance 2003-38 Public Building Impact Fee 102703_ COMM_Add_ On]ublic_Hearing_ 403_ Ordinance_20D3 _38 Page 1 of2 COMMISSION AGENDA ADD-ON ITEM 403 Consent Information Public Hearing X Regular October 27.2003 Meeting MGR. r /Dept. REQUEST: City Manager requesting the City Commission to approve the First Reading of Ordinance 2003- 38 establishing a Public Building Impact Fee. PURPOSE: This agenda item is needed to implement a Public Building Impact Fee to help fund public buildings. CONSIDERATIONS: On March 10, 2003 the City Commission approved a contract with Land Design Innovations (L.D.I.) to prepare an impact fee to help fund public building utilized for the conduct of General Administrative and Information System Services (Attachment "C"). L.D.I. has completed their report and recommends the impact fees as shown on Exhibit "1" of this agenda item. FUNDING: As shown on Exhibit "2" of this agenda item the unadjusted methodology would produce an estimated $4,701,699 in impact revenue, far more than is needed. As shown on the adjusted rate schedule Exhibit "3" of this agenda item the adjusted impact fee schedule is expected to generate approximately $2,924,019 to fund the expansion of City Hall through build-out and the admini.strative facilities of the new Public Works Facility and other unforeseen projects. Expansion of City Hall Public Works Center Other Total $1,650,000 600,000 674.019 $2,924,019 RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that the Commission (1); review the proposed impact fee study and recommendations, (2); approve the First Reading of Ordinance 2003-38 implementing the adjusted rate schedule as shown in Exhibit "1", and (3); schedule the Ordinance for Second Reading on November 10,2003. IMPLEMENTATION: October 26, 2003 Commission approval of Ordinance 2003-38 First Reading. November 10,2003 Commission approval of Ordinance 2003-38 Second Reading. November 11, 2003 Implementation of new impact fee rules. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit "1" - Detailed Adjusted Public Building Impact Fee. Exhibit "2" - Detailed unadjusted Rate Schedule. Exhibit "3" Detailed Adjusted Rate Schedule. Attachment "A" - Proposed Ordinance 2003-38. Attachment "B" - L.D.I. Impact Fee Study Report. Attachment "C" - March 10,2003 Agenda Item "J". COMMISSION ACTION: Exhibit" t " CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS DETAILED ADJUSTED PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE Land Use Unit Funetional Net Cost/ Net % Adjusted Pop!/Unit Func. Pop. Cost/Unit Reduction Rate I Residential Dwelling 1.34 $120.00 $160.80 37.81% $100.00 Specialty Retail 1000 sf 1.49 $120.00 $178.80 37.81 % $111.20 Convenience 1000 sf 12.25 $120.00 $1,470.00 37.81% $914.19 Store/ Gas/ Service Shopping Center 1000 sf 3.15 $120.00 $378.00 37.81% $235.08 Industrial 1000 sf 1.16 $120.00 $139.20 37.81 % $86.57 Warehouse 1000 sf 0.74 $120.00 $88.80 37.81% $55.22 Automotive Sales 1000 sf 1.92 $120.00 $230.40 37.81% $143.29 General Office 1000 sf 1.80 $120.00 $216.00 37.81% $134.33 Medical Office 1000 sf 3.49 $120.00 $418.80 37.81 % $260.45 Financial Institution 1000 sf 2.95 $120.00 $354.00 37.81% $220.15 Golf Courses Holes 2.40 $120.00 $288.00 37.81% $179.11 Restaurant 1000 sf 4.77 $120.00 $572.40 37.81% $355.98 Fast Food Restaurant 1000 sf 3.41 $120.00 $409.20 37.81% $254.48 Hotel/Motel Room 0.77 $120.00 $92.40 37.81% $57.46 Exhibit "2" 2003 DEVELOPABLE LANDS - UNADJUSTED RATE SCHEDULE :~,~~:t'11~~~m:~t:::::::::::~:::::~::::':::::::::::::::::::::::::::11::::::::::r:::::::lMe.4@T':8lf.~\~M~Q.lr$,%'gQWR\4.aNa':U~<<$::::,~::::,:t::n:~~ ................. . . . . . . . . . . . .. ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ................. ............. ... ............"... ...........,.".. ................. . . . . . . ". .................. ................."... .................... ......... ........... ..... ...................... ......... .. ..... ........ ............. ..... ................................. ..... ................... ....... ......................... ..... ........................... ..............................,.. .... ................... ............................ ..... ........................... .... .................. .......................... ..." ................... .."..................... ..... ..... ... .............. .. .................. .... ..... .......... ..................... ................. .... ....................... :!:!:!:!::2~:~.~:!:~\!!!~~I!!!!!!!!!!!:!!:!I!I!i!II~~~1~~~~;~*::::::::::: ....................... ...................... ..................... ...................... ...................... Residential Rural Low Density Res. Medium Density Res. High Density Res. Commerical (4) Industrial (4) Public/Semi-Public Recreation/Open Space Vacant Sub.~Tota :::/?":",.,,,::, :::{'::,::' ................ - -.. .......................... o 1.1 3.6 9.1 0.25 0.25 0.25 o DU/Acre 1.0 DU/Acre 3.5 DU/Acre 9.0 DU/Acre 21.0 FAR 0.5 FAR 0.5 FAR 0.5 FAR 0.25 N/A DU/Acre DU/Acre DU/Acre DU/Acre FAR FAR FAR FAR N/A :::~:~:::fHgM:::::::MnM~;~i~:!mp~~::: :~:::::::MmMe~@mm.P!E~~':: ~~r:i~~!::~:~!:!,::::.:.::...::....:::::'::::.t~.~!~:~::!::::..!:~...:.:I!:.:.!:!:.:!:...::"..:!:::.:~:.:i~ij~:::::::::::::::::::::~~:::::::m 15 $0.00 $2,412.00 179 $31,661.52 $100,741.20 o $0.00 $0.00 o $0.00 $0.00 129 $522,589.32 $1,045,178.64 87 $352,443.96 $704,887.92 o $0.00 $0.00 o $0.00 $0.00 o $0.00 $0.00 ,:$Q!i; .....~!l..:. .;$ .;L..;Z .::::: ................................................ .... .',.,',:,:,:::,:,:,:,:,:,:::,:,:,:,:"",:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,: :,:::,:/jtirb'A:'~~:,i'!"t!'e.:':'A:jMnm,.:t~.t!':,:,:,:,:l:hl,:bl'l:Jl::b:":,:~:,:l:,:,:A:Al1S,:,:US' "i'!"t!'::: .... .:;:;:;:::;:::::;:-:;:.::::;::;:::;:::;:::;:.:.: :.:.;.:.:.:.:-;.;-:-:.:-:-:-:.;.:::;:::::;::;:;;;;';';';';';';';':. ;::::::f....,.f,r:;:~:~:f:::;:n~:J;;:::Mm~:uf;y::'::~;:;~::;;:v~n: ~p:f,j,;;:~;;:...;;~:t.~f,;;f.:;;:~:" t;~:.; .. .... .:.:.;.:.:.;.;.:.;.:.;.:.;.:-;.:.:.; ;.;...:...........:.:...:...:.:.;.;...:.; :.:...;.:.:.:.....:.....:.....:...;.: .... .;...:.... ..... ....... ........ '.: .......... .. ...... .. ... '. .... .. . . .................... :::::::::::::::::~::::r:/~:~:~.:.;.......:...:.... .. . ::::::::::~:;:~:~:~:~:~:f}~:~:~:~ :~:fr:::':'~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:;:~:~:~:~:~:~:~::.;.;.:.:.;.: ;.:..:.:.:.;..;.; ..... :::::::::~;~:~:~:~::;i:~:r~;r;:::~:~:::::::::::::::::::~:::::::;:::::::; :::::.:::.:::..:::::.::.:.:...... ..:::. ..:.:.................-.............:.:.::. ;;;;;;; ....;.: ::. .::::::::::::::::::;;:t::fffff::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;:;::::::: ......... ................................... . .......Mediaji"i{~s .... ::::::::::::M!:~~#.h:99:mmnI:::::::::::::::::fflg9M:::~:::::' ::~:~R!M.!M~i:~mB!E~:::: ::::'::.:~::::N99f:R!~tps!m:::f: Mixed Use Town Center 8 12 0.8 1.0 0.8 FAR FAR FAR P.B. Impact Fee: Residential: ~::::r:::nM~Mr per DU ......................... Non-residential ::::~::::,:::'~i~;9.:g:: per 1,000 sq-ft Note: Non-residential rate is an average of rates for the various types of non-residential development as identified on pg. 9 of the Winter Springs Public Buildings Imapct Fee Report dated August 2003 as prepared by Land Design Innovations, Inc. ASSUMPTIONS: Mixed Use: 50% ResidentiaV50% Commercial 2,500 sq. ft. average dwelling unit Town Center: 75% ResidentiaV25% Commercial 2,000 sq. ft. average dwelling unit Greenway: 25% ResidentiaV75% Commercial 1,700 sq. ft. average dwelling unit 1) Residential credits based on 2004 impact fees payment, average 2,500 sf house with a $175,000 value. 2) Non-residential Impact fees are an average for the individual land uses identified within the report. 3) Impact fee amounts take into consideration the appropriate credits due. 4) FLUM Acreage from the Comprehensive Plan 5) Impact fee amounts for variable land uses based upon median build out scenario. 10/24/2003 Exhibit "3" 2003 DEVELOPABLE LANIDS - ADJUSTED RATE SCHEDULE :::JJ:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::J:::::::::r:J:::::J::::J:::::rI:J:::J:::::r:::lMe.~k1J6.gl$:t1M~Ui!Mk$::H~Q;fI?fft:~4.t!QJ;!$.<<$::::: ............. ........ ............ ......... ..................... ...................... ...................... ....... ..... ....................... ................... . .............. ...... ......................... -, .......................... ........... ..... . ......................... ......... -. ....... .. ...... .......................... ........... . ..... ............. ......... ...............,....... ....................,................ ............................................... ...................... ............................................. ...................... .................................. ..................... ........................................ .................... ..... .. ................. ......... !!!!!!:~~!~!!!:!!~!~~~!~'::.i:!j::l.III.:111:ll.il~~!1f-!::~::~~f::::::::: Residential Rural 0 Low Density Res. 1.1 Medium Density Res. 3.6 High Density Res. 9.1 Commerical (4) 0.25 Industrial (4) 0.25 Public/Semi-Public 0.25 Recreation/Open Space 0 .................. .,..,..,.......... .,.....,..,..,...........,. ...,.,..,........,........,... .............................. ........... ...... .. ......... .... ............ . ........... .. . ............ . ........... .. ............... ........ ........................ 1.0 DU/Acre 3.5 DU/Acre 9.0 DU/Acre 21.0 DU/Acre 0.5 FAR 0.5 FAR 0.5 FAR 0.25 FAR N/A 11~lllll~~~ Ililll~~ljlll~I~~IIIIIII~~jli:~;,I~lil~II~II;~~ 15 $0.00 $1,500.00 179 $19,690.00 $62,650.00 o $0.00 $0.00 o $0.00 $0.00 129 $325,002.79 $650,005.59 87 $219,187.93 $438,375.86 o $0.00 $0.00 o $0.00 $0.00 o $0.00 $0.00 : AtO:: .:$~.~:3;&~Q;!~:.$JA~~;~~1.A~:i:. .. : :.:..:.:..,.::::::::....::.:.",.",.",..:..:.:.::::...::........:..", ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::,::::::Z: 'lftA'D::ii::jSm:::tti:t'r::A:':' '-:iiAril..'lic'mci<:.:::,:.;.~::jjfR" Hi:iifB'" :,:::t=::';:::::i!':,,:iri:::;::,<,!,:.Et:i:S:'::::::: :;:::::::::::::::::;:i:;:::i:;:i:::':':':;:::i;;:i:::::::i:::i::i::::::::::::::::;t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~t~ti}~:!~~t~:.J!!rn~~~~f:~~~~rrFR~~~:..:::..~p:p;~,~:~~~~~~~~t~~~~t::N:,.::...~........~~~~~~~:~~~~~p:~:gp~~~~~r .. .. ................... ..................... ,..............."" ............,..'..... ..............,...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................... ..................... ..................,....................... ..................... ..................... ............ .... ................... .................. ................. .. ..... ....... .... .................... .............. . .. .... ... . ................... ..... ... ..... . ..... ......... . ..... .........................................,........., ................,,,,..,.. .... ........... .... ...... .................. ...,......................... ................. ............................................"..... ..........,............... . ........ ............ .... . ..... ...... ....... ...........".. ...."....................... ........."......................................... ................................ .... .... ..... ... . ......... '''. .. ............................. ..............". .........................................................................'.................'........................................................ ......... ...........,..............'...............'.....................'................................,.......,.....,'.'.',' , . ...,.,',',.,',',.,',',',','.',..',.,'.'.'.','...'.....'. ................................ ............ .... ....." """"""........"" """"""""..".."....".., ,. ........."".."........ .. ......................... .. .. ."." '''. .... ".."".".....,...... """...""""""""...,., ........... .. Mixed Use 8 Town Center 12 Greeneway Interchange 8 $ij'~H riit~/~:::::::::::::\::\ .::\ DU/Acre DU/Acre DU/Acre 0.8 FAR 1.0 FAR 0.8 FAR P.B. Impact Fee: Residential: ::::::::!1P9:!P:9:: per DU Non-residential r://$.~~1:i~~:: per 1,000 sq-ft (37.81% reduction from unadjusted rate of $16.80) (37.81 % reduction from unadjusted rate of $372.00) Note: Non-residential rate is an average of rates for the various types of non-residential development as identified on pg. 9 of the Winter Springs Public Buildings Imapct Fee Report dated August 2003 as prepared by Land Design Innovations, Inc. ASSUMPTIONS: Mixed Use: 50% ResidentiaV50% Commercial 2,500 sq. ft. average dwelling unit Town Center: 75% ResidentiaV25% Commercial 2,000 sq. ft. average dwelling unit Greenway: 25% ResidentiaV75% Commercial 1,700 sq. ft. average dwelling unit 1) Residential credits based on 2004 impact fees payment, average 2,500 sf house with a $175,000 value. 2) Non-residential Impact fees are an average for the individual land uses identified within the report. 3) Impact fee amounts take into consideration the appropriate credits due. 4) FLUM Acreage from the Comprehensive Plan 5) Impact fee amounts for variable land uses based upon median build out scenario. ATTACHMENT "A" L.D.I. Impact Fee Study Report City of Winter Springs Public Buildings Impact Fee Analysis Report August 2003 Prepared For: City of Winter Springs Community Development Department 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708-2799 Prepared By: Land Design Innovations, Inc. 140 North Orlando Avenue, Suite 295 Winter Park, Florida 32789 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE TABLE OF CONTENTS A INTRODUCfION. ......... .......... ...... .......... ...................................... .......... ......................... 3 B. ME THODOLC><:iY ............................................................................................................. 3 1. Benefit Dismct... ........1..... ..... ...... .......... ... ....... ........................ .......... ....... ...................... 3 2. Sernce Unit....................................................................................................................3 a. Residential Functional Population ................. ...................... ...... ............. .......................... .......... 4 b. Non-Residential Functional Population ....................................................................................4 (1) Source - Seminole County Property Appraisers Database, 2000. .............................................................6 3. Level of Sernce .. ................ ......... .............. ........... ... ............. ........................ .................. 6 4. Cost per Sernce Unit .....................................................................................................7 5. Revenue Credits. ......... .......................... ... ............ ...... ............. ........... ............................ 7 6. Maximum Public Building Impact Fee Schedule ......................................................... 9 c. .APPENDIX ....................................................................................................................... 10 1. August 22,2000 - CORE GIS Statement of Values ...................................................... 10 2. Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey - Table 7.16: Average Vehicle Occupancy by Trip PUIpose .........................................................................................11 3. 2000 US c:ensus Bureau Population Data ................................................................... U 4. Seminole County Property Appraiser's - City of Winter Springs Commercial Building Square- F oota. ges ................ ... ....................................................................................... 13 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Residential Functional Population .................. .................... ......... ................ ................................... 4 Table 2: Non-Residential Functional Population ........................................................................................5 Table 3: Gty of Wmter Springs Total Functional Population - 2000....................................................... 6 Table 4: Gty of Wmter Springs Public Building Data ................................................................................7 Table 5: Building Cost per Functional Population ......................................................................................7 Table 6: Public Building Debt Service Credit............................................. ..................................................8Table 7: Public Building Net Cost Per Service Unit.................................................................................... 9 Table 8: Maximum Public Building Impact Fee Schedule..........................................................................9 11 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE A INTRODUCTION Impact fees are used by municipal governments to recover those capital expenses necessary to maintain adopted levels of service associated with new growth. These identifiable capital costs are assigned directly to those residents or service users responsible for the additional cost to help offset capital funding deficiencies and to ensure equity amongst all users, existing and new. The City of Wmter Springs provides a number of public buildings that are used to provide civic services to the city businesses and residents that are not addressed in other impact fee charges levied by the City. For the purpose of the public building impact fees, public buildings are defined as all buildings owned and operated by the City, which are not addressed in separate impact fees. The City of Wmter Springs public buildings, as listed in Section B(3) of this report, provide a variety of services to the public. .As the City continues to expand and develop, the need fo"r public buildings will also increase. The Public Building Impact Fee is designed to ensure that new development pays its fair and proportionate amount of the expenditures for expanding these capital facilities. The determination of a public building impact fee amount involves the establishment of facility standards and current deficiencies, inventory and assessment of existing facilities, apportioning of costs to new developments, determination of appropriate credits, and the incorporation of time- price differentials. These elements are defined in the following report for the calculation of a Public Building Impact Fee. B. METHODOLOGY G.u-rently, the City of Wmter Springs does not assess a Public Buildings Impact Fee. .As such, a methodology for the calculation of this impact fee must be determined. The following report calculates a public building impact fee based upon a standards driven methodology. A standards driven methodology is an impact fee determination based upon the historical capital investment made to support a determined level of service and projections of need based upon theoretical future capital costs. The following details the determination of the various parameters used in calculating the Public Building Impact Fee. 1. Benefit District Public buildings within the Gty of Wmter Springs provide a wide variety of services to the public, which are Citywide in nature. .As such, the entire City is considered as a single benefit district for the purposes of this report. 2. Setvice Unit The City of Wmter Springs public building impact fee level of service is expressed in terms of functional population. This approach is based upon the assumption that the demand placed upon these facilities is generally proportional to the presence of people utilizing these facilities. It represents the number of "full-time equivalent" people present at the site of a land use. Calculations of the functional population are presented in latter sections of this report. 3 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE a. Residential Functional Population Residential functional population is based upon a 16-hour day. A 24-hour day is not utilized as the services provided by public. service buildings are not provided during night time hours. Of the 16-hour day, it is assumed one-half of that time is spent at home while the other half is spent at "away from home" activities where there is potential for utilizing the services provided by public buildings. Therefore, the residential functional population is calculated by dividing the population by one- half. The 2000 census population numbers were used as it was the best available data and because the public building replacement values identified in Section B(3) were determined in year 2000. Table 1: Residential Functional Population 2000 Census Population Hohsing Urlits (I) I Persons per Unit Occupancy Factor Functional Population per Unit 31,666 (1) Housing units is representative of occupied units not total units. 2.69 0.50 1.34 b. Non- Residential Functional Population The calculation of the non-residential functional population also utilizes a 16-hour day. The methodology used to calculate the non- residential functional population is based upon national trip generation data as calculated by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (fIE). The non-residential functional population per 1,000 square-feet is determined by dividing the total number of hours spent by employees and visitors at a particular land use. Employees are assumed to spend 8- hours at their work place while visitors are assumed to spend 20 minutes to one hour per visit depending upon the type of land use. The formula for calculating non-residential functional population is provided below. NonResidential. Functiornl Pop./l.OOO sf is cakulattrl by thefdlauingfarmula: (Employee Hours/1,000 sf + Visit Hours/1,000 sf) / 16 Hours/Day Based upon the definitions below: Employee Hours/1.000 sf = employees/1,000 sf x 8 hours/day Visitor Hours/1.000 sf = visitors/1,000 sf x hours/visit Visitors/1.000 sf = weekday ADT/1,000 sf x Average Vehicle Occupancy- employees/ 1 ,000 sf Weekday ADT/1.000 sf = one-way average daily trips 4 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE Table 2: Non-Residential Functional Population Land Use Unit Trip Ave. Vehicle Emp. ~er Visitors Hours per Functional Population Rate (I) Occupancy (2) Unit 3) per Unit (4) Visitor (5) per Unit (6) Specialty Retail 1000 sf 20.34 1.71 1.96 32.82 0.25 1.49 G:mvenience Store/Gas/Service 1000 sf 422.8 1.71 1.96 721.03 0.25 12.25 Shopping Center 1000 sf 21.46 1.71 1.96 34.74 1.00 3.15 Industrial 1000 sf 3.49 1.16 2.08 1.97 1.00 1.16 Warehouse 1000 sf 2.48 1.16 1.27 1.61 1.00 0.74 Automotive Sales 1000 sf 18.75 1.71 1.96 30.10 0.50 1.92 General Office 1000 sf 5.51 1.42 3.32 4.50 0.50 1.80 Medical Office 1000 sf 18.07 1.52 4.05 23.42 1.00 3.49 Financial Institution 1000 sf 78.24 1.64 1.96 215.52 0.25 2.95 Golf Courses Hole 17.87 1.47 1.74 24.53 1.00 2.40 Restaurant 1000 sf 44.98 1.84 1.96 117.95 0.75 4.77 High Turn Over Restaurant 1000 sf 65.17 1.84 1.96 454.47 0.33 3.41 HoteVMotel Room 4.12 1.78 0.71 6.62 1.00 0.77 (1) Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 6th Edition, one-way average daily trips per 1,000 square-feet. (2) US Department of Transportation, 1990 National Personal Transportation Survey. (3) Employees per 1,000 sq-ft from lTE manual (ADT per 1,000 sf divided by ADT per employee-retail rate from National Association of Office and Industrial Parks) (4) Calculated from formula. (5) Hours per visitor asswned based upon land use type. (6) Calculated from formula. 5 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE The total functional population for the City of Wmter Springs is based upon the existing land use and functional population multipliers as previously calculated in this section. The base year for the calculation of the Oty's functional population is 2000. Table 3: City of Winter Springs Total Functional Population - 2000 Land Use i Unit 2000 Functional Functional Units (I) Pop.lUnit Population Residential Dwelling 11,774 1.34 15,777 Specialty Retail 1000 sf 104.282 1.49 155 Convenience Store/Gas/Service 1000 sf 39.832 12.25 488 Shopping Center 1000 sf 72.440 3.15 228 Industrial 1000 sf 207.348 1.16 241 Warehouse 1000 sf 48.650 0.74 36 Automotive Sales 1000 sf 47.274 1.92 91 General Office 1000 sf 212.568 1.80 383 Medical Office 1000 sf 0 3.49 0 Financial Institution 1000 sf 5.130 2.95 15 Golf Courses Holes 36 2.40 86 Restaurant 1000 sf 1.989 4.77 10 High TurnOver Restaurant 1000 sf 3.358 3.41 12 HoteVMotel Room 0 0.77 0 Total 17,522 (1) Source - Seminole County Property Appraisers Database, 2000. 3. Level of Setvice The Oty of Wmter Springs does not have an adopted level of service standard for public buildings. Therefore, this report will establish a level of service standard based upon the existing level of service currently being provided for public buildings by the City based upon the population. Table 4 identifies the total City of Wmter Springs existing square-footage of public buildings and the total replacement value of those buildings. According to the data provided in Tables 1 and 4, the Oty has 28,030 square-feet of public buildings and a 2000 population of 31,666. Therefore, the existing level of setvice provided by the City is 0.89 sq-ft per capita. 6 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE Table 4: City of Winter Springs Public Building Data Building Description I Building Area (sf) Replacement Cost (I) Public Works Garage 1,975 $150,000 Public Works/Utility Office 925 $69,458 Public Works Storage 2,430 $15,956 City Hall Municipal Complex 22,700 $2,734,889 Total 28,030 $2,970,303 (1) Building replacement costs taken from Aug. 22, 2000 - CDREGIS "Statement of Values" provided by the Gty of Wmter Springs. 4. Cost per Setvice Unit The public buildings owned and operated by the City of Wmter Springs provide a variety of services to the businesses and residents of the Gty. .As indicated in Table 4, the existing public buildings have a total building area of 28,030 square-feet and a year-2000 replacement value of $2,970,303. These buildings service the City's functional population as described in Section 2 of this report. Dividing the replacement costs by the functional population being served results in a cost of $169.20 per service unit to maintain the existing level of service. Table 5: Building Cost per Functional Population Public Building Replacement Cost $2,970,303 Functional Population, 2000 17,522 Cost per Functional Population $169.52 Source: Land DeSign Innovauons, Inc. 5. Revenue Credits The premise of impact fees is to ensure that new development pays for the capital expenditures necessary to build the public facilities needed to service new development. This protects existing development from shouldering the burden of providing additional public services required to service new development while continuing to maintain the quality and services currently being provided for future generations. Likewise, new development is not responsible for paying the cost for capital expenditures required to service existing development. Therefore, an analysis of the means by which existing capital improvements were financed is necessary to determine if credits are due to new development to offset future payments in the form of taxes, special assessments, user fees, etc. In the calculation of . the Public Building Impact Fee, it was assumed that general fund resources would not be used in financing future capital expenditures for public buildings and that all capital costs associated with public buildings would be funded through the assessment of the public building impact fee. According to the City of Wmter Springs finance department, Wmter Springs City Hall is the only public building that was funded through a bond and not currently paid in full. The 7 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE original cost of City Hall was $1,672,331 which was 100% financed by the 1984 Improvements Revenue Bond. This bond has since been refunded several times, ultimately with the $7,998,969.75 Series 1999 Bond. At the time of the issuance of the Series 1999 Bond, the City Hall debt service was approximated at $1,466,989 or 18.34% of the total Series 1999 Bond. The calculation of the Oty Hall debt service percentage of the overall Series 1999 Bond is provided within the spreadsheet found in the Appendix section of this report. The following table details the remaining payments towards the retirement of this bond, the amount devoted to retiring the Oty Hall debt and the corresponding payment per functional population. Table 6: Public Building Debt Setvice Credit Fiscal Year T otal Deb~ City Hall Functional Payment/Func. Setvice I (18.34~/o ) Po ulation (1) Po . 2004 573,815.00 105,237.67 18,632 $5.65 2005 580,762.50 106,511.84 18,911 $5.63 2006 591,182.50 108,422.87 19,365 $5.60 2007 369,797.50 369,797.50 19,830 $3.42 2008 142,377.50 142,377.50 20,306 $1.29 2009 159,792.50 159,792.50 20,793 $1.41 2010 176,192.50 176,192.50 21,292 $1.52 2011 191,537.50 191,537.50 21,739 $1.62 2012 205,672.50 205,672.50 22,195 $1.70 2013 213,787.50 213,787.50 22,662 $1.73 2014 230,912.50 230,912.50 23,138 $1.83 2015 241,725.00 241,725.00 23,623 $1.88 2016 246,487.50 246,487.50 24,120 $1.87 2017 260,462.50 260,462.50 24,626 $1.94 2018 263,125.00 263,125.00 25,143 $1.92 2019 1,275,000.00 1,275,000.00 25,671 $9.11 2020 1,275,000.00 1,275,000.00 26,210 $8.92 2021 1,275,000.00 1,275,000.00 26,761 $8.74 2022 1,275,000.00 1,275,000.00 27,323 $8.56 2023 1,275,000.00 1,275,000.00 27,896 $8.38 2024 1,275,000.00 1,275,000.00 28,482 $8.21 2025 1,275,000.00 1,275,000.00 29,080 $8.04 2026 1,275,000.00 1,275,000.00 29,691 $7.88 2027 1,275,000.00 1,275,000.00 30,314 $7.71 2028 1,275,000.00 1,275,000.00 30,951 $7.55 2029 1,275,000.00 1,275,000.00 31,601 $7.40 Total $18,472,630.00 $3,387,880.34 $U9.50 Net Present Value (2) $49.52 (1) Functional Population projections based upon the following annual growth rates taken from the City of Wmter Springs Comprehensive Plan: 2000-2005 @ 1.5%; 2006-2010 @ 2.4%; 2011-2029 @ 2.1%. (2) Net present value is based upon an assllilled interest rate of 7%. 8 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE Table 1: Public Building Net Cost Per Setvice Unit Cost Per Functional Population $169.52 Credit Per Functional Population $49.52 Net Cost Per Functional Population $120.00 Source: Land DesIgn Innovations, Inc. 1. Maximum Public Building Impact Fee Schedule Table 6 identifies the maximum Public Building Impact Fee that may be adopted by the City of Wmter Springs. This fee is determined by multiplying the net cost per functional population by the functional population per unit for the individual land uses. Table 2: Maximum Public Building Impact Fee Schedule Land Use Unit Funttional Net Cost/ Net % Adjusted Po~.IUnit Func. Pop. Cost/Unit Reduction Rate Residential Dwelling 1.34 $120.00 $160.80 37.81% $100.00 Specialty Retail 1000 sf 1.49 $120.00 $178.80 37.81% $111.20 Qjnvenience 1000 sf 12.25 $120.00 $1,470.00 37.81% $914.19 Store/ Gas/Service Shopping Center 1000 sf 3.15 $120.00 $378.00 37.81% $235.08 Industrial 1000 sf 1.16 $120.00 $139.20 37.81% $86.57 Warehouse 1000 sf 0.74 $120.00 $88.80 37.81% $55.22 Automotive Sales 1000 sf 1.92 $120.00 $230.40 37.81% $143.29 General Office 1000 sf 1.80 $120.00 $216.00 37.81% $134.33 Medical Office 1000 sf 3.49 $120.00 $418.80 37.81% $260.45 Financial Institution 1000 sf 2.95 $120.00 $354.00 37.81 % $220.15 Golf Qjurses Holes 2.40 $120.00 $288.00 37.81% $179.11 Restaurant 1000 sf 4.77 $120.00 $572.40 37.81% $355.98 Fast Food Restaurant 1000 sf 3.41 $120.00 $409.20 37.81 % $254.48 HoteVMotel Room 0.77 $120.00 $92.40 37.81% $57.46 9 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE C. APPENDIX 1. August 22,2000 - COREGIS Statement of Values l i ' --*------ 1-- -- - - - --.____..1.__,. Jj{ . - -. - ~ -- f- --.. - - . - - - - -- - - . - . ,.- -1-.. J11f3 glr, ~jjlnHP dB" Wnl). ii~ H~ Sij', 5, - - '-- -- - -,u ~Ie k ~ ~ ~ - 9 t1 ~ h ~ ~ if K :I !i <{ :I t r. d f! a 11 ~ -~ - ----- ------. ~-.- --r -:~ .:: ---..-..- ~ ~ - - - - " ,,- - '.. ~ I..: -.. .. - fl - - ... - --.. , -....U .. -.. .. --.. _ . _ .............. _ . _ _ _ _ _1_ ~ h r ~ I ~ I-"~ "ff ij Q ~ Hit ill H " ~ B ii q P ~ ~ H U . " . . -. d - -." ~ '1 ~h~"~~!;P~1 ii- ii' !.~i-_"'Ull~ ~ -h~::~H.:.. n'.r~<::.:I~'r.. -- I i ". '" . . . HIH n H i U a ij ,. ~ .. " - . .. - - .. - -r- - - I:. ~ ... ~ ~ t ..- E ~ i; = : i g ~ 'Q '! n ~ f ! ~ ~ ...11 !LL'::_ ":: IUI !~-..- ~g!i!' .---- .....~.,.,'~-,--.- --t.....-- I j If. i- f 3 :.~ \- "? Qj ~j ill 5 ; !::':I::"~u::-U . . . _ __i. . ..__.. __111! .~!~, __ __ _.. I} r~-i l!~PJ'1 11 i IU!H1fH g ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ w... - --..... -,- - -.. ~ . _~ 0: ~:{ E. _~ ft ~ ~ ~ ~.s s ~ ,:: ~ ile ~ _. . .., Ifi f IEIJlfl t IIIIj!!t II ~I;;;;:;l!:: :::: :: ::: :::;j: n 1H d r~ 11 P j p; n fi ~ F~ ~.~ il . 1!11= ... '1-- "", ,;;, 1; ; L ;; .. ;; .H ij ..___1_ -... _ . -... " .. _.. "._. .C .. ~ "I ~ o. . . " .~i! k ~ i ~ "l; if ICl:jI l~1 ~~j t; , I . r-.---- H "".'~:_"""". ~ ~ I . I J a k ".'If · "i ~;t: p<< tJ ~Iu !H h Hi! ~ H ~! ~"e~ ~~n tt ~~~i~ ~811 s~; HH~!H H !r'i~1I ~]!1"'!;' !~R~ ~l~"P .~hfi ~<4" ia. ~HB 1"1' ~~Ht IH~ II ~~gi~ Efi b~ ~h~i '~gh fig JL~lAJIH__W -ltTiri"~'.E"'u-" 1 ! J I . lId d IH :Jld 'd IdOl ~~..:U!WUM 10 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE 2. Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey - Table 7.16: Average Vehicle Occupancy by Trip Purpose ,,-'~. ,~l':(:;~l:,"~..; L"d'! ~~j "','.1 "-, f1hIE.4 .')1< ~ td!:-"!I#"I.~~t(,.;4,: 'J..,F,\....'...:;>."j;,~<, Avera~e Vehicle Occupancy by Trip Purpose \Person Miles per Vehicle Mile) 1977, 1983, end 1990 NPTSI .1977 1983 1990 Trip Purpose Average O~upancy Percenl of VMT Average Occupancy Percent of VMT Average Occupancy Percent of VMT ;"EARNING'A:(IV1NC]J~:;;;'",:J;:'~';::;:~ ~!1~[if~iJ;:3.2.;.:,!~:':m:t:3"9:;3Jf~!~~1~Cn~3~Z~~:i~~:;;:.l"k.3A;'3;CI};~mi;;;l~i:;(; 1:.J .6,:., 3:;fI~;J[';~3~5'G1:[~~ To or from Work 1.30 31.7 1.29 30.2 1.14 32.1 Work Related 1.39 7.6 1.57 4.2 1.42 3.0 ':FAM.'LY'&."IlERS.O'N'A.,r.:OQ. 51.I"S. $: ".:f:'F'"' "'9,!f'-.-;'"4;tiZ..'O'Z . . . , _. r.__,., I:\l,:;P ~ .J~t, ,_..~..:..- _I..L",L..I'.;.t;~" Shopping 2.06 Medical/Dental 2.14 Other 1.96 ":'~"'-~,~S]:r~a4;'9::.,:J~;:;a:~i!(J~ill1t.8:0~;:~~~~'l~~fd~3:Clr4~rm~fr~f~~!~~~JTFl8::2~~~q~!;t~n1J?'2~.8~S~~ 11.1 1.8 12.0 1.79 1.69 1.82 13.3 1.5 15.5 1.71 t52 1.84 11.5 1.3 20:0 iKClVlC~EOUaATlONAC:&:RElIGIOUS., ';'1~:95!:"i""=:::;~=.:\,: 5.'21]f"~[SQr.I'J2~Ogt~\ll!J::if,i:m~40i1~(iti{fi;,1'~~lW61~~~1~ffiJf;~~1L\;:~1tfA~ ~So.CIAt .&,RECREAlI ONAl;,,;}':;]", ~;i;~ ,', .,,~, 'I: 44 .... !,[' :'1!ii:!:'i!ili;21S32:::}~111\iS:. ..',LZ;,t2TJ~~:rr1':4~~~3,O:Of;t~:0I~;:;\\G~;:2:~Q8';lf~lt~1l!&'i26;$I?:21~~ Visiting F riencls Pleasure Driving Vacation Other 2.25 12.1 2.01 13.5 1.82 11.6 3.19 0.9 2..34 1.1 199 0.7 2.68 0,6 2.52 2.1 2.38 1.5 2.59 13.7 2.15 13.3 2.28 13.1 ::'QlH,ER:&jUNKNOWNiili;~P,ffi~~. ;11'~;SI34;2Q;:n '.;;,,;~B1,T~a~Wj"::=:ii~Dcr;J!: 92' '-1 ::f'C::::Jl'Z,i;,... ""::81:$;;'::19'.:71:1:![j~iJ\~O:~F":';0j; lliALl~P'UBHom~:=J:;~:;::~:~r.tgE[t::::3 :]~'::;]~i~8Q~~~~::';'~ir:~:'=1:0'OjO:;::r=i .2;;~,~';:;'C.7.5..... =:=;~,?:1'O:O',(FuE1;!f,i:~.:~:. ;,1~6~';!,t!]r~1'0:oro::~:~H 1 For Informallon on comparing 1981and 1990 NPTS survey data, see SCttion 4 of Chapter 1. 11 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE 3. 2000 US Census Bureau Population Data U S;. C ' " . , -' " , t' .'N;;:'~"\"'A"'~M-":';: ",~.t~. I ",.., " cnsus Bureau;'.: V:":"j;': ,. '.:'~'11 ~,;:,q; ~~"'P"~"ii ." i>: . . . I ~ .." .' . '. ~ "'~ ..1~,..t"U':(r ';-' ~ " j.., Quick 'Ta'bles "l..,.~<.;~:~t''',''. . ,: ._ '. " ." ._~~..,;;,::-~~, ',.[1 ',Mtericao,'~C"tF.~, '~~. Main I,Search. I 'Feedback I FAGWI GlossarY I Help gT~PL. Race, Hispanic or LatiQo.,and'Age: 2000 'D<!ta.$et: Census QOOO Redistricting Data (Pubfic bw 94-1Z1LSummary I'ile Geographic ~rea:, Wiriter. Spi'iii~s:i:i~, Flo'ricla NOTE: For liiformapcin on.confldenil~lity protection, no'nsarnpllng error, IInd definltlons,$ee hlto'/lfaclflnoerc'ensus oov/home"Jeri/oati,molei1exlii1!l!;J:llml' . . .. AII.atles 18vellnnnd over ....,. suhrect Numba' . Petcen Numbe :. .Percen ...' '. RACE .. Total DODulatlon '31 666 100,0.,. '23 106 ,,100;0 One race .... "'u_", -.-.. -....... 31;037 .--... .98: .~. 22761 ,98:5 White )2809 ;88.. .20 7.66 .89.9 BlaCk or Alrica n American 1'452 ....- 4:6 .: .... 982 4',2. American,lndian and Alaska Native. . 5 .0,2 43 0.2 Asian ., 61 1.9 455 .2.0 NativeHawaiian andOther'Paciflc Islander. 14 o. .12 " :0:1 . SonW .other race, .. 799 2.1 50 2.2 : Two ormore races 629 2. 345 .1'.5 .. .. . .. ./.t1SF1ANIC:OR LATINO AND RACE '. . Total 'ooiluliition ,31"666 100.0 23.106 100.0 Hislianicor"latino. 01 anI! race ., 3,330 .10.5 ..2227 .."9:6 Not Hlsoanic"or,llltlno . .28;336 .89, 20.879 .90.4 .Onerace 27-;949 .......188.3 20;677 . 89.5 Whne 25,851 ,8l.6 19,208 83.1 BlaCK or Afrlcan,AmerlCan 1:363 .'" .933 4. American Indian ana Alaska Native .4 .0;2 38 0,2 '. Asian 80 1.9.. ,. ..448 . 1.! Native:Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islanoer 13 . ,.,0.0 11 O. Saine.other raee 68 0.2 39 O. TwO ormoie raoos 387 1.2 202 ;0,9 (Xl.Not applicable . . Source: .U:S. Ce~sus.Bureau.. Cens\ls.20.00 RecI(strictlng Data, (Pu~lic.lavit 94,171) Summary File;. MatrlcespL1, Pl2, P.L3, and'PUt 12 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE 4. Seminole County Property Appraiser's - City of Winter Springs Commercial Building Square-Footages ....' '" _._........-.l.~.""....~_~. ........." .... ~,...~,........~.....,..,....~_~_~."'."'.~'-::no;c__--r_-,..,......tr-"'.~~."'~....__,."..__...-:~_-'-__ 1.0000001 SINGLE FAM 12 01 1241.00000 0.543 1.00000 C COMM SALES 11 C 4464.00000 0.216 1.00000 R RSTRUCTUR 11 R 912.00000 6:173 1.00000 C MASONRY PI 11 C 2376.00000 1.615 1.00000 C MASONRY PI 11 C 13070.00000 1.842 1.00000 R HOUSE/OFFI 11 R 1546.00000 0.154 1.00000 C C STRUCTUR 11 C 1608.00000 0.062 1.00000 C C STRUCTUR 11 C 1608.00000 0.078 1.00000 R R STRUCTUR 11 R 1172.00000 0.141 1.00000 R RESIDENTIA11 R 1427.00000 0.191 1.00000 R HOUSE/OFFI 11 R 1025.00000 0.157 1.00000 C MASONRY PI 11 C 6625.00000 0.099 1.00000 C COMM SALES 11 C 4690.00000 0.367 1.00000 C COMM SALES 11 C 4464.00000 0.820 2.00000 C OFFICE 11 S 1296.00000 2.480 3.00000 0 WAREHOUSE 11 S 8040.00000 1.669 1.00000 S S STRUc.;rUR 11 S 9720.00000 0.508 1.00000 C COMM SALES 11 C 4690.00000 0.225 1.00000 C C STRUCTUR 11 C 16429.00000 0.229 1.00000 C C STRUCTUR 11 C 3861.00000 0.642 1.00000C COMMSALES 11 C 1960.00000 0.147 '5<<nMt,~- Crt'f ve W1JJ1"EP SAA~~G-S- !'bi\lj.{fOSl1::>/?W1'L4L B-vl.tt>I/J4' :Jc;,-l'T. TOTAL sa. FT. by DOR CODE: ......~.~~..~......'...~-- OOR SO.FT oaR Description A&5IGNCC LAND 48 48650 WarehouseJFlex Space '.>!MiEIi !>I..\':>6 44 21300 Packing Plant IN1:>IIl~\"'RIA\. 43 14400 Lumber Yard pltll~5TI~\A \... 41 171648 Light Manufacturing \~C.4~~IAL. 38 27798 Golf Course SOl.F C;:)uR,$€' 28 9172 Mobile Home Parks NIA' ~e<;1tll:lJn"" 27 47274 Auto Sales AumMOTwe ~'7At.S S. 26 17816 Servie/Gas/Convenience Stations C.ONV ~ ~e I'-<~e 'i:oTo/~e 25 22016 Service Shp (.o,.."YE,.-\l\~Ce. $r~e:z. 23 5130 Flnanciallnslilution fl~1.'~IAI. I,;"'.n"!"',, 22 3358 Drive In ~est. P;<,:Yr F= f',}tUi;..,u.; 21 1989 Res Cafeteria 'i6~"'fIWil:A;o.lT' 19 121041 Professional Buildlngl Radio & TV Stations O,Plc.e 18 47235 OfficeBldg o~t:t<:e 17 44292 OfficeBldg CFr"ce. 16 72440 Shoppin9iCenter Commercial/Nei9hborhood S i>O'f'PlAlb- (.G>.JTE'R 12 13097 Mixed Use ::.t>Cc;.IM..N m".TI\li.. 11 91185 Stores- Retail/ Discount! Convenience St'CCIAl..i't .~!~.L U&!;..i:< 1.... ! 1,,"5 f ~E'R<llee I {f,1\50J "",'"",ce, ,,~.oJ ;1..Vrr IPI8~ .~q;;;fI;:'.;;:'~:;";:::"~7Z.(J.~.1Jl ~ l:f GMC!GO?I1:!; J6 tQfNTj(>.el> ,/o! FWlC.TIMAl.. Po}~l!.A,'aN CA~C!.V..AT'"lt)>J ar: RE:?"R'1" CcURCf.:: $l!.MI~eL..e: Cl>l..V.l'N r!~o'Pl1I't'iy A'7PI~AJ6i!t~ t>niAt:')A5G ,2000, 13 ATTACHMENT "B" Ordinance Number 2003-38 ORDINANCE NO. 2003-38 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES CHAPTER 9, ARTICLE vm, IMPACT FEES, BY ESTABLISHING A PUBLIC B~DING IMPACT FEE; PROVIDING FOR TIlE REPEAL OF PRIOR INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS, INCORPORATION INTO THE CODE, SEVERABll.JTY, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Flori~ has previously found and determined it to be in the best interest of the safety, health, and welfare of the citizens of the City of Winter Springs to establish police, fire and other impact fees to require new development to pay their equitable share of public improvements that must be constructed to serve new growth; and WHEREAS, the City Commission has commissioned an impact fee study and has retained Land Design Innovations, Inc. (''LOf') to complete the study and prepare a report on the feasibility of creating an impact fee to assist the City in paying the costs incurred maintaining adequate administrative public buildings which are required to service the needs of the public and the residential and commercial citizens of the City ofWmter Springs; and WHEREAS, ill! has issued to the City an impact fee report entitled, "City ofWmter Springs Public Buildings Impact Fee Analysis Report," dated August 2003 ("Report"); and WHEREAS, the City Commission hereby finds that the Report legally justifies the imposition of public building impact fees pursuant to applicable law. See, e.g., Volusia County v. Aberdeen at Ormond Beach, 760 So. 2d 126 (Fla. 2000); Contractors and Builders Association of Pinel/as County v. City of Dunedin, 329 So. 2d 314 (Fla. 1976); Waldv. Metropolitan Dade County, 338 So. 2d 863 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Hollywood, Inc. v. BrowardCounty, 431 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); and WHEREAS, the City Commission finds that Section 163.3202(3), Florida Statutes, encourages the use of innovative land development regulations which includes the adoption of "impact fees," and WHEREAS, the City Commission also finds that the impact fees required by this Ordinance are _~_ _ _ _ n~ssary to ~tigate impaq:s_rea.sonably- attributable to new d_ey~19pment; and WHEREAS, the City Commission also recognizes that the Florida Legislature has mandated that local government plan comprehensively for future growth and that this regulatory Ordinance is consistent with that mandate. See, e.g.. Ch. 163, Fla. Stat.; and City of Winter Springs Ordinance No. 2003-38 Page 1 of 7 WHEREAS, new land development activity generates public facility and service demands within the City and it is reasonable to require new development to pay a fair share of the cost of expanding new public facilities and services attributable to new development; and WHEREAS, this Ordinance is enacted pursuant to the Florida Municipal Home Rule Powers Act, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, the City ofWmter Springs Comprehensive Plan, and other applicable law authorizing a municipality to set rates, fees, and charges for new development; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Wmter Springs to amend the City's police, fire/rescue, and parks and recreation impact fees and procedures. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS HEREBY ORDAlNS, AS FOLWWS: Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are hereby incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2. Code Amendment, Chapter 9, Article VIn, Division 3. The City of Winter Springs Code, Chapter 9, Article VIII, Division 3, is hereby amended as follows (underlined type indicates additions and st..ikeout type indicates deletions, while asterisks (* * *) indicate a deletion from the Ordinance of text existing in Chapter 9, Article VIII, Division 3. It is intended that the text in Chapter 9, Article VIII, Division 3 denoted by the asterisks and set forth in this Ordinance shall remain unchanged from the language existing prior to adoption of this Ordinance): ARTICLE vm. IMPACT FEES * * lie DIVISION 3. POLICE, FIRE, PUBLIC BUlLDINGS AND PARKS AND RECREATION See. 9-391. Generally. The city commission hereby establishes police, fire, public buildings and parks and recreation impact fees under the requirements of this division. The City Commission finds that the Florida Growth Management Act mandates that local government plan comprehensively for future growth and that this division is consistent with that mandate. In addition, Section 163.3202(3), Florida Statutes, encourages the use of innovative land development regulations which includes the adoption of "impact fees." FUrther, new land development actiVity~ generates pllolic ThCilityandseTVice-- demands within the City and it is reasonable to require new development to pay a fair share of the cost of expanding new public facilities and services attributable to new development. This division is enacted pursuant to the Florida Municipal Home Rule Powers Act, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, the City ofWmter Springs Comprehensive Plan, and other applicable law authorizing a municipality to set rates, fees, and charges for new development. City of Winter Springs Ordinance No. 2003-38 Page 2 of 7 See. 9-391.1. Levy and purpose. For the purpose of helping to defray the cost of new or expanded police, fire, public building and parks and recreation fuci1ities and equipment attributable to new construction within the city limits, impact fees are hereby levied on new construction within the city limits in accordance with the provisions of section 9-391.5, payment offee~ and other provisions of this division. This division is intended to be consistent with the principles for allocating a fair share of the cost of new public fuci1ities to new users as established by the Florida Supreme Court. In support ot: and as legal justification for, the impact fees adopted under this division, the city commission hereby adopts by reference the report~ prepared by Land Design Innovations, Inc. entitled, "City ofWmter Springs Impact Fee Analysis Report for Police, FirelRescue and Parks & Recreation," dated November 2002 and ''City ofWmter Springs Public Buildings Impact Fee Analysis Report." dated August 2003. See. 9-391.2. Defmitions. Unless otherwise specified herein, the definitions, classifications and uses shall be as set forth in the City ofWmter Springs Land Development Code. * * * (f) Public Buildings capital improvements: The land buildings. facilities. vehicles and equipment necessary for the general administrative services division of the city to provide general administrative services to the citizens ofWmter Springs. (fg) Residential: Includes single-family dwellings, multifamily dwelling units, mobile homes, accessory dwelling units, accessory residential structures. 1t 1t 1t See. 9-391.5. Payment of fees. lit lit lit (c) Amount offee. ~he follow~.::g impact fees are hereby adopte~ ... . __ * * * City of Winter Springs Ordinance No. 2003-38 Page 3 of 7 (5) Public Buildin~: As provided in Exhibit" 1" attached hereto. -}lee includes credit which new deve1Qpmc:nt will incur to retire the 19M Improvements Revenue Bond (liS refunded from time to time) which Wll.~ \lsed to finance the cons~on of Ci~ H;.JI. At the time of eSlablishine thjfl Puhlic: Building Imp:u:t Fee. this bond was the only outstand:; bc,nd which was u~ed tu fund pllst COI1sttuctl.on of CilV ltumi,ustmtlve Iletvicc :p~lblic b~ldjnIl5. *** Sec:. 9-391.7. Establishment of a trust fund. (a) The impact fees collected by the city pursuant to this division shall be kept separate from other revenue of the city and a capital expansion tnLc;t fund is hereby created for each impact fee category created Wlder this division as follows: ~ Public Buildings Capital Expansion Trqst Fund. ..* See. 9-391.8. Capital expansion plans. TIle city',s police, fire and parks and recreation departmcnij;, which is am to receive funds collected pursuant to this impact fee division, shatl prepare and maintain a capital expansion plan for their respective individual funds which shall be for a period of no less than ont' (1) year. Each department's plan shall be reviewed and approved by the city commission at least annually during the budget review process_ The city mana~er or the city manager's designee shall be r~sible for the capital expansion plan for the public buildings capital ex;pansion ku$t fund. ... ... ... City of Winter Springs Ordinance No. 2003.38 Page 4 of 7 Sec. 9-391.10. Vested rights. (a) A developer or successor in interest of land which has received a building permit may petition the city commission for a vested rights determination which would exempt the petitioner from the provisions of this division. Such petition shall be evaluated by the city attorney and a recommendation thereon submitted to the city commission based upon the following criteria: (1) There exists a valid, unexpired government act authorizing a specific development for which a determination is sought; (2) Expenditures or obligations made or incurred in reliance upon the authorizing act that are reasonably equivalent to the fees required by this division; (3) That it would be inequitable to deny the petitioner the opportunity to complete the previously approved development under the conditions of approval by requiring the developer to comply with the requirements of this division; (4) Common law principles of equitable estoppel and vested rights set forth in case law. (b) For the purpose of this section, the following factors shall be ~nsidered in determining whether it would be inequitable to deny the petitioner the opportunity to complete the previously approved development: (1) Whether the injury suffered by the petitioner outweighs the public cost of allowing the development to go fOlWard without payment of the fee required by this division; (2) With respect to the relevant impact fee. Wwhether the expense or obligations were made or incurred subsequent to November 1, 2002, after which day the adoption of the police. fire. and parks and recreation impact fees required by this division was pending, or - August L2003~ after which-day the adoption of the public buildings impact fee required by this division was pending; and (3) Whether the operation of this division would create an inordinate burden which would prevent petitioner from making a reasonable return on his investment. City of Winter Springs Ordinance No. 2003-38 Page 5 of 7 ( c) The city shall not permit the extension of a building pennit beyond the initial time for activation without the applicant complying with this division. (d) If a previously approved development order or other binding agreement contained conditions regarding impact fees required by this division and their designated uses, or contributions to the capital asset inventory of the respective department~, the developer or his successor may request a modification of such prior approvals in order to bring the approval conditions into consistency with the requirements of this division. * * * Section 3. Repeal of Prior Inconsistent Ordinances and Resolutions. All prior inconsistent ordinances and resolutions adopted by the City Commission, or parts of prior ordinances and resolutions in conflict herewith, are hereby repealed to the extent of the conflict. Section 4. Incorporation Into Code. This ordinance shall be incorporated into the Wmter Springs City Code and any section or paragraph number or letter and any heading may be changed or modified as necessary to effectuate the foregoing. Section 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, word or provision of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, whether for substantive, procedural, or any other reason, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption by the City Commission of the City ofWmter Springs, Florida, and pursuant to City Charter. City of Winter Springs Ordinance No. 2003-38 Page 6 of 7 ADOPTED by the City Commission of the City ofWmter Springs, Florida, in a regular meeting assembled on the _ day of , 2003. A TIEST: CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA ANDREA WRENZO-LUACES City Oerk JOHN F. BUSH Mayor Approved as to legal form and sufficiency for the City of Winter Springs only: ANlHONY A. GARGANESE City Attorney First Reading Posted Second Reading and Public Hearin2 C:\Documents and Settlngs\Anthony\My Documents\Anthony\Work\Client Matters\W1nter Springs\Impact_Fee_Publlc_Bulldlng.wpd City of Winter Springs Ordinance No. 2003-38 Page 7 of 7 Exhibit" ]" CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS DETAILED ADJUSTED PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE Land Use Unit FunCtional Net Olst/ Net % Adjusted Popl/Unit Func. Pop. Olst/Unit Reduction Rate I Residential Dwelling 1.34 $120.00 $160.80 37.81% $100.00 Specialty Retail 1000 sf 1.49 $120.00 $178.80 37.81% $111.20 Qmvenience 1000 sf 12.25 $120.00 $1,470.00 37.81% $914.19 Store/ Gas/Service Shopping Center 1000 sf 3.15 $120.00 $378.00 37.81% $235.08 Industrial 1000 sf 1.16 $120.00 $139.20 37.81% $86.57 Warehouse 1000 sf 0.74 $120.00 $88.80 37.81% $55.22 Automotive Sales 1000 sf 1.92 $120.00 $230.40 37.81% $143.29 General Office 1000 sf 1.80 $120.00 $216.00 37.81 % $134.33 Medical Office 1000 sf 3.49 $120.00 $418.80 37.81 % $260.45 Financial Institution 1000 sf 2.95 $120.00 $354.00 37.81% $220.15 Golf Qmrses Holes 2.40 $120.00 $288.00 37.81% $179.11 Restaurant 1000 sf 4.77 $120.00 $572.40 37.81% $355.98 Fast Food Restaurant 1000 sf 3.41 $120.00 $409.20 37.81% $254.48 HoteVMotel Room 0.77 $120.00 $92.40 37.81 % $57.46 ATTACHMENT "C" March 10, 2003 Commission Agenda Item "J" 031003 Commission Meeting Regular "J" General Office Facility hnpact Fee Study / COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM J Consent Informational Public Hearing Regular X March 10,2003 Meeting rr--- Mgr. / Dept. Authorization REQUEST: City Manager requesting the Commission to authorize the City Manager to enter into a contract with LDI, Inc. to prepare a General Office Facility and Information Systems Equipment Impact Fee Ordinance and to authorize a supplemental appropriation from General Fund reserves to pay for same in the amount of $5400. ") PURPOSE: This Agenda Item is needed to make the Commission aware of the need for a General Office Facility and Information Systems Impact Fee, and to acquire funding and authority to pursue the preparation of the impact fee. CONSIDERATIONS: The continued growth of the City and resulting growth in City office and storage needs requires an expansion of City Hall to house Information Systems, Finance, records and storage, and other general office space, and the need for expanded Information Systems equipment to service the expanded facilities. We anticipate that approximately two million dollars will be needed over the next ten years as the City reaches build-out and our population grows from 32,000 to 45,000 residents or approximately a Y3 increase in growth. FUNDING: No additional appropriation required. I am authorizing the expenditure of $5,000 from the General Government Contingency Fund to fund the study. 031003 Commission Meeting Regular "f' Geneml Office Facility Impact Fee Page 2 Of2 SRI has performed a space analysis plan that indicates a need for approximately 11,000 square feet of additional space through build-out. We have had a preliminary expansion plan for Phase I for approximately 3,000 square feet proposed by SRI that will satisfy our needs over the next five years. The cost of this project is estimated to be $750,000, including furnishings and equipment. We could be collecting these impact fees within 90 days. We estimate that it would cost approximately $150 - $200 for single family residences. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that the City Commission do the following: 1. Authorize the City Manager to enter into a contract with LDI, Inc., to prepare a General Office Facility and Information Systems impact fee ordinance. 2. Authorize a supplemental appropriation in the amount of $5400 from General Fund Reserves to fund the study. ) ATTACHMENTS: a) SRI Preliminary Design Graphics. b) LDI Contract. COMMISSION ACTION: