Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002 08 12 Regular G City Manager Annual Review ~ 081202 Rcgular G City Managcr Rcview COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM G \~ August~, 2002 Meeting Consent Informational Public Hearin~ Re~ular X Mgr. ~\ 1 Dept. Autho~ization REQUEST: City Manager requesting the City Commission to deCide issues related to the City Managers annual review. PURPOSE: This agenda item is needed to finalize compensation and other issues related to the annual review of the City Manager. CONSIDERATIONS: At the May 6, 2002 Special Meeting of the City Commission Jhe. City .Manager presented information related to compensation and performance for Performance Year l1/0 1/00 to lO/3 1/01. The Commission requested additional information which is provided herein. FUNDING: No additional budget authorization required. RECOMMENDA TION: It is recommended that the Commission finalize discussions and decisions relative to the City Managers compensation and performance. ATTACHMENTS: .City Manager memorandum ofMay.13;.2002,..... COMMISSION ACTION: I, .f, 1. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 1126 EAST SlATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32708-2799 Telephone (407) 327-1800 Ronald W McLemore City Manager MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Commission . . Ronald W. McLemore, City Manager;? FROM: DATE: May 13,2002 SUBJ: Performance Issues - Performance Year Nov. l, 2000 to October 3l, 2001 As per your direction I have personally reviewed the compensation data prepared by Gene DeMarie to ensure that the data was correctly stated. The City Manager is entitled to pay comparables in effect on November 1,2001. For that reason each of the cities were asked to identify the City Manager's compensation on November l, 200L .. .- . I did find a few inaccuracies. Additionally, I used the average value of the car allowances in those cities where car allowances was provided as the stated value of a car in the cities where cars were provided. This was clone to provide a fairer presentation of the value of the two alternatives. In Gene's calculations he gave a zero value to a car provided by a city in the alternative to a car allowance. With these adjustments the difference between the metro average on November 1, 2001 and the City of Winter Springs was 6.5% as follows: Metro Winter Springs Difference $138,44l $130.000 $$ 8,44l Utilizing Gene's method of giving a.zcro.value.to city.cars being-provided.to a..City____ Manger and correcting the mistakes he made, the difference between the Metro Average and Winter Springs average would be 4.5% as follows: Metro Average Winter Springs Average Difference. . $135,891 $130.000 $ j,891 , Again, Gene's method does not fairly reconcile the value of a vehicle in the two different cases. The last compensation action taken by the City Commission on July 24, 2000. At this meeting the City Commission adjusted my compensation for two years as follows: Performance Year November I, 1999 - October 3l, 2000 - 8.6% Performance Year November I, 2000- October 3l, 200 1 - M% 12.0% /jp Attachment U:\DocS\Word\Depl Head Reviews\CM Annual Review Memo 2002.doc Page 2 of2 . -.- ..... - .... ... l",j ..........1 ".... ,....; .Vi... CITY MANAGER/CEO COMPENSATION PACI(AGE SURVEY - 2001/2002 Metro Cities of Comparable Population* ..., City Paid Retirement Deferred Auto Life Ponulation City Base Salarv Retirement % Pavroll romn. Allowance Total Insurance I 22,629 Casselberry $102,210 $21;311 20.85 -0- $5,100 $128,621 $50,000 City Car* 47,814 Kisimmee $111,591 $22;318 20.00 -0- $5,100 $139,009 $100,000 City Car* 26,316 Oviedo $125,623 $8,794 7.00 $8,500 $5,700 $148,617 $125,000 26,642 Apopka** $131,202 $16,572 12.63 -0- $5,100 $152,874 S30,000 Citv Car* I 52,715 Sanford $103,000 -0- -0- $10,300 $5,400 $118,700 I S100,OOO 24,090 Winter Park $122,245 $8,557 7.00 $7,824 $4,200 $142,826 $300,000 A yerages 33,368 6 cities $115,979 $12,925 11.14 $4,437 $5,100 $138,441 $117,500 31,666 Winter Springs $94,000 $23;200 24.68 $8,000 $4,800 $130,000 $350,000 -1,702 Difference <$21,979> $10~275 13.54 $3,563 <$300> <$8,441> $232,500 2000 Census (Preliminary) , . . * Assumed value - based on average of the three known values ** Strong Mayor with Chief Administrator Fonn of Goveminent U:\Docs\Word\Dept Head Reviews\CM 2001.2002 Compensation Survey.doc <.:. ,::m\: DEMARIE METHOD CITY MANAGER/CEO COMPENSATION PACKAGE SURVEY - 2001/2002 Metro Cities of Comparable Population* "..! City Paid Base Salary I Retirement Deferred Auto. Life Ponulation Qty Retirement % Pavroll Comn Allowance Total Insurance 22,629 Casselberry $102,210 $21,~11 20.85 -0- City Car $123,521 $50,000 47,814 Kisimmee $111,591 $22,318 20.00 -0- City Car $133,909 $100,000 26,316 Oviedo $125,623 $8,794 7.00 $8,500 $5,700 $148,617 $125,000 26,642 Apopka** $131,202 $16,~72 12.63 -0- City Car $147,774 $30,000 52,715 Sanford $103,000 -0- -0- $10,300 $5,400 $118,700 $100,000 24,090 I Winter Park $122,245 $8,557 7.00 $7 ;824 $4,200 $142,826 $300,000 , Averages 33,368 6 cities $115,979 $12,925 11.14 $4,437 $5,100*** $135,891 $117,500 31,666 Winter Springs $94,000 $23,200 24.68 $8,000 $4,800 $130,000 $350,000 -1,702 Difference <-$21,979> $10,275 13.54 $3,563 <$-300> <$-5,891> $232,500 . 2000 Census (Preliminary ** Strong Mayor with Chief Administrator Form of Government *** This number is the average of the auto allowances granted by cities with this monetary benefit \\CITYHALL_PDC\JPALLADlNo\Docs\Word\Dcpl Head Reviews\CM 2001.2002 Compensalion Survey,doc