HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001 05 14 Consent E Transportation and Education Infrastructure Plan
. COMMISSION AGENDA
ITEM E
CONSENT X
INFORMATIONAL
PUBLIC HEARING
REGULAR
May 14,2001
Meeting
MGR ~EPT J#--
Authorization
REQUEST: Public Works Department Requesting Authorization to Execute an Interlocal
Agreement for the Transportation and Education Infrastructure Plan with
Seminole County, the municipalities within Seminole County and the Seminole
County School Board.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this Board item is to authorize the Mayor to execute the attached
lnterlocal Agreement for the Transportation and Education Infrastructure Plan with
Seminole County, the municipalities within Seminole County and the Seminole
County School Board which provides for the distribution of the proceeds of the
proposed One Cent Sales Tax Renewal.
CONSIDERA TIONS:
This interlocal agreement is needed for the City to participate in the transportation
and education infrastructure plan funded by the proposed renewal of the One Cent Sales Tax.
The referendum for the "2nd Generation" One Cent Sales tax is scheduled for September 4,
2001. The renewal period would be for ten years beginning January 1,2002.
The City Commission adopted Resolution #2001-06 on February 12,2001 supporting
the "2nd Generation" One Cent Sales Tax. The information provided at that meeting has only
changed by the recommendations of the MayorlCity Manager working group to base the
distribution formula on the 2000 Census data for the 37.5% shared with the municipalities.
This has resulted in an estimated increase of approximately $600,000 for the City of Winter
Springs to a ten year projected total of$12,984,000. The extra funds were added to the
individual projects as a contingency, Some of the projects on the City's list have been
May 14,2001
Consent Agenda Item E
Page -1
consolidated by the County for presentation and public information purposes.
This interlocal agreement differs from the current One Cent Sales Tax in that the
distribution is percentage based instead of a fixed amount, and the revenues will be deposited
in individual accounts as they are received allowing the participants to also earn interest on
their share, Participants would be allowed to add or delete their individual projects by having
a public hearing with the appropriate notification to the other entities.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
A successful referendum would result in the City receiving an estimated
$12,984,000 over the next ten years for transportation related projects. There is an
upfront cost for the creation of a public information program of which the City's share is
estimated at $3,878. This would be paid from the Transportation Improvement Fund
Reserves.
RECOMMENDA TION:
It is recommended that the City Commission authorize the Mayor to execute the
attached Interlocal Agreement for the Transportation and Education Infrastructure Plan
with Seminole County, the municipalities within Seminole County and the Seminole
County School Board which provides for the distribution of the proceeds of the proposed
One Cent Sales Tax Renewal and for the City's estimated $3,878 share of the public
information program to be funded from the reserves of the Transportation Improvement
Fund.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Interlocal Agreement
2. Summary Revenue Distribution
COMMISSION ACTION
A TT ACHMENT NO. 1
SEMINOLE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AND EDUCATION
INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT, by and between SEMINOLE COUNTY, a
political subdivision of the State of Florida, whose address is Seminole County Services
Building, 1101 East First Street, Sanford, Florida 32771 (hereafter referred to as the
"COUNTY"),
THE SEMINOLE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, a school district created by
Florida law, whose address is 400 East Lake Mary Boulevard, Sanford, Florida 32773,
(hereafter referred to as "SCHOOL BOARD"), and the following municipalities:
THE CITY OF AL TAMONTE SPRINGS, a Florida municipal corporation, whose
address is 225 Newburyport Avenue, Altamonte Springs, Florida 32701 (hereafter
referred to as "AL TAMONTE SPRINGS"); and
THE CITY OF CASSELBERRY, a Florida municipal corporation, whose address
IS 95 Triplet Lake Drive, Casselberry, Florida 32707 (hereafter referred to as
"CASSELBERRY"); and
THE CITY OF LAKE MARY, a Florida municipal corporation, whose address is
Post Office Box 950700, Lake Mary, Florida 32795-0700 (hereafterreferred to as "LAKE
MARY"); and
THE CITY OF LONGWOOD, a Florida municipal corporation, whose address is
175 West Warren Avenue, Longwood, Florida 32750 (hereafter referred to as
"LONGWOOD"); and
THE CITY OF OVIEDO, a Florida municipal corporation, whose address is 400
Alexandria Boulevard, Oviedo, Florida 32765 (hereafter referred to as "OVIEDO"); and
1
THE CITY OF SANFORD, a Florida municipal corporation, whose address is
Post Office Box 1788, Sanford, Florida 32772-1788 (hereafter referred to as
"SANFORD"); and
THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, a Florida municipal corporation, whose
address is 1126 East State Road 424, Winter Springs, Florida 32708 (hereafter referred
to as "WINTER SPRINGS").
WIT N E SSE T H:
WHERJ;AS, under the authority of Section 212.055(2), Florida Statutes, and
pursuant to Seminole County Ordinance Number 01- , the COUNTY has
imposed a 1.0 percent (1 i) local government infrastructure sales surtax upon taxable
transactions occurring in Seminole County and has provided for distribution of the
proceeds from the surtax, subject to the outcome of a referendum in September, 2001;
and
WHEREAS, the COUNTY, the SCHOOL BOARD, and signatory municipalities
desire to earnestly and cooperatively work together in order to benefit the citizens of
Seminole County and the municipalities within Seminole County by improving the
infrastructure of the Seminole County school system, by providing acceptable levels of
service for roadways within Seminole County, and by providing for the distribution of
revenues of the local government infrastructure sales surtax according to the terms of
this Agreement,
NOW, THEREFORE, In consideration of the promises, covenants and
commitments contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt
and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged by all parties hereto, the parties
2
agree to provide for the distribution of the revenues derived from the local government
infrastructure sales surtax as follows:
Section 1. Term. This Agreement shall become effective when approved by
the Governing Bodies of the COUNTY, the SCHOOL BOARD, and the requisite number
of municipalities pursuant to Section 212.055(2)(c)1, Florida Statutes. This Agreement
shall remain in effect for the life of the surtax imposed pursuant to Seminole County
Ordinance Number 01-
Section 2. Distribution of Proceeds.
(a) The net revenues (meaning the collected surtax less the amounts retained
by the Florida Department of Revenue pursuant to Florida law) derived from the local
government infrastructure sales surtax levied and imposed by the COUNTY shall be
allocated totally to the COUNTY.
(b) The COUNTY shall transfer to the SCHOOL BOARD twenty-five percent
(25%) of the overall net revenues collected during the life of the surtax, for use by the
SCHOOL BOARD on the projects listed in Exhibit "A" to this Agreement. The proceeds
shall be distributed as shown in Exhibit "A" to this Agreement.
(c) The COUNTY shall use thirty-seven and one half percent (37'Y2%) of the
net revenues to diligently prosecute the projects on major roads in Seminole County
listed in Exhibit "B" to this Agreement.
(d) The COUNTY and the signatory municipalities shall use the remainIng
thirty-seven and one half percent (37~%) of the net revenues to diligently prosecute the
transportation projects listed in Exhibit "C" to this Agreement. The net revenues
referred to in the immediately preceding sentence shall be distributed among the
3
COUNTY and the signatory municipalities according to the formula contained in Section
218.62, Florida Statutes, incorporating population data from the 2000 Census published
by the Census Bureau in March 2001. The distribution that results from the application
of this formula is attached hereto as Exhibit "0".
(e) If any local government successfully appeals the results of the 2000
Census figures as published by the Census Bureau, the distribution formula found in
Exhibit "0" shall be recalculated to reflect the adjustments made in the 2000 Census
results by the Census Bureau. -Any such change shall be effective at the start of the
distribution year following the adjustment.
(f) It is the intent of the parties to improve the infrastructure of the Seminole. --
County school system. It is the intent of the parties to improve the transportation
infrastructure within Seminole County and its municipalities, and thereby provide
acceptable levels of service to the residents of Seminole County and its municipalities
as they travel the transportation system within Seminole County. It is the intent of the
parties that revenues derived from the local government infrastructure surtax (other than
the revenues distributed to the School Board pursuant to this Agreement) will be used to
fund the identified improvements and other necessary transportation improvements by
constructing and reconstructing transportation facilities. The parties recognize the need
to consistently communicate on an ongoing basis with regard to the use of surtax
revenues and as to the project needs and timing as set forth in Exhibits "A", "B", and
"C".
4
Section 3. Project Lists.
(a) A project listed in Exhibits "A", "B" or "C" may be deleted from these
exhibits, or a project may be added to Exhibits "A", "B", or "C", only after approval by the
governmental entity controlling the project following an advertised public hearing. The
governmental entity proposing the changes shall notify the COUNTY's Manager and all
other governmental entities that are parties to this Agreement no less than thirty (30)
days before the public hearing. The other government entities that have received notice
of the proposed addition or deletion shall have the right to propose comments to the
local government entity proposing the change, and any such comments shall be duly
considered. Within ten (10) business days following the action of the governmental
entity proposing the changes, any of the commenting parties may file an appeal of that
action with the Seminole County Board of County Commissioners. After reviewing the
original comments, recommendations and action with the governmental entity proposing
the change, the COUNTY shall approve or reject the proposed revisions at a public
meeting.
(b) The scope of an existing project listed in Exhibit "A", "B" or "C" may be
expanded, reduced, or otherwise altered upon the written approval of the chief
administrative officer of the governmental entity seeking the change, subject to the
statutes, rules, and procedures of the local government entity, and with the written
concurrence of the COUNTY's Manager,
Section 4. Entire Agreement.
(a) It is understood and agreed that the entire Agreement of the parties is
contained herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements ands
5
negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof as well as any
previous agreements presently in effect between the parties relating to the subject
matter hereof.
(b) Any alterations, amendments, or waivers of the provIsions of this
Agreement, other than those matters addressed in Section 3 of this Agreement, shall be
valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed by the parties.
IT WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties having caused this Agreement to be duly
executed in nine (9) counterparts by their respective and duly authorized offices on the
respective dates.
SIGNATURES BEGIN ON PAGE "1
6
ATTEST:
SEMINOLE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
Clerk to the
Seminole County School Board
By:
SANDY ROBINSON, Chairman
Date:
SIGNATURES CONTINUE ON PAGE 8
7
PATSY WAINRIGHT, City Clerk
CITY OF AL TAMONTE SPRINGS
By:
RUSSEL HAUCK, Mayor
Date:
ATTEST:
SIGNATURES CONTINUE ON PAGE 9
8
ATTEST: CITY OF CASSELBERRY
By:
THELMA L. McPHERSON, City Clerk BRUCE A. PRONOVOST, Mayor
Date:
SIGNATURES CONTINUE ON PAGE 10
9
ATTEST:
CITY OF LAKE MARY
CAROL A. FOSTER, City Clerk
By:
THOMAS C. GREENE, Mayor
Date:
SIGNATURES CONTINUE ON PAGE 11
10
ATTEST:
CITY OF LONGWOOD
GERALDINE ZAMBRI, City Clerk
By:
PAULLOVESTRAND,Mayor
Date:
SIGNATURES CONTINUE ON PAGE 12
11
ATTEST:
CITY OF OVIEDO
BARBARA BARBOUR, City Clerk
By:
MARY LOU ANDREWS, Mayor
Date:
SIGNATURES CONTINUE ON PAGE 13
12
ATTEST:
CITY OF SANFORD
JANET R. DOUGHERTY, City Clerk
By:
BRADYLESSARD,Mayor
Date:
SIGNATURES CONTINUE ON PAGE 14
13
~~--_..-
By:
PAUL PARTYKA. Mayor
ENZO LUACES
Date:!), () 0 I
J 7
SIGNATURES CONTINUE ON PAGE 15
14
By:
PAUL PARTYKA, Mayor
~ ) liJlJ'I
/ t
ATTEST:
CITY 0
ANDREA LORENZO LUACES
City Clerk
Date:
E~1t-- Jp Q:~1 -
\t ~~~.
SIGNATURES CONTINUE ON PAGE 15
14
ATTEST:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA
MARYANNE MORSE
Clerk to the Board of
County Commissioners of
Seminole County, Florida.
By:
DICK VAN DER WEIDE, Chairman
Date:
For the use and reliance of
Seminole County only. Ap-
proved as to form and legal
sufficiency.
As authorized for execution by the Board
of County Commissioners at its
2001, regular meeting
County Attorney
H B\d re
05\01\01
Attachments
Exhibit A - SCHOOL BOARD Project List
Exhibit B - COUNTY Project List
Exhibit C - COUNTY and municipalities' Project List
Exhibit D - Distribution of Proceeds List
G:iCA\USERS\CAHB02\2D GEN SALES TAX\lNTERLOCAL6.DOC
15
EXHIBIT A
1 % Local Government Infrastructure Sales Surtax
Distribution Of Net Revenues For Educational Facility Projects
Year*
% to School Board
1/2002
2/2003
3/2004
4/2005
5/2006
6/2007
7/2008
8/2009
9/2010
10/2011
45%
45%
45%
25%
25%
25%
25%
8% **
8% **
8% **
. Revenues received monthly by
Seminole County.
. Upon receipt of monthly revenue
distribution from the State Dept. of
Revenue, the applicable % wi11
promptly be remitted to the School
Board by Seminole County.
Overall
25%
*Year = 1 Year of the Life of the 1 % Local Government Infrastructure Sales Surtax
Levy, which is a calendar year.
** During Year 7, a projection update of net revenues shall be prepared by Seminole
County and provided to the School Board for review. As part of the projection update,
the percentages for Years 8 through 10 will be recalculated so as to yield a projected
distribution to the School Board at the end of the 10 years of 25% of the overall net
revenues.
A similar projection update shall be prepared and reviewed during Year 9, including a
recalculation of the final year's percentage which would be used for the first 11 months
of Year 10. The last monthly distribution of Year 10 shall be adjusted as necessary to
yield a final distribution to the School Board at the end of the 1 0 Years of 25% of the
overall net revenues.
S:\Special Projects\l Cent Sales Tax\EXHIBIT A.doc/OS/08/01/8:02 AM
1 of 2
EXHIBIT A
1 % Local Government Infrastructure Sales Surtax
Educational Facility Projects
(by Seminole County School Board)
PROPOSED NEW CONSTRUCTION/EXPANSION -RENOVATION SCOPE
PRELIMINARY
SCHOOL ORIG. CONST. COST
DESCRIPTION NO. ADDED DATE FOR ESTIMATE
CLASSROOMS RENOVATION
SITES
AL T AMONTE ELEM Convert open plan to self-contained classrooms; 20 1974 $8.5M
add media center; add classrooms
FOREST CITY ELEM Convert open plan to self-contained classrooms; 20 1971 $8.5 M
add media center; add classrooms
SABAL POINT ELEM Convert open plan to self-contained classrooms; 10 1974 $6.5 M
add media center; add classrooms
STERLING PARK ELEM Convert open plan to self-contained classrooms; 10 1974 $6.5 M
add media center; add classrooms
WINTER SPRINGS ELEM Convert open plan to self-contained classrooms; 10 1974 $6.5 M
add media center; add classrooms
EASTBROOK ELEM Convert open plan to self-contained classrooms; 10 1970 $6.5 M
add classrooms
LAKE MARY HIGH Renovate and upgrade classrooms; add 8 1979 $20 M
~ performing arts center/classrooms; upgrade
media center
OVIEDO HIGH Renovate classrooms; add physical education 10 1967 $30 M
facility, band and chorus rooms and general
classrooms
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL To provide relief for Greenwood Lakes, 50 New Site $22 M
Millennium, and Sanford Middle
NEW ELEMENTARY To provide relief in the Oviedo area 35 New Site $11 M
RED BUG ELEM Convert open plan to self-contained classrooms; 15 1972 $7 M
add classrooms
TOT AL' 198 $133 M
'These projects are part of an overall $277.75 M capital program of renovations and classroom additions which will add
a total of 400 classrooms over the next 10 years.
S:\Special Projects\1 Cent Sales Tax\EXHIBIT A.doc/05/08/01/8:02 AM
2 of 2
EXHIBIT B
1 % Local Government Infrastructure Sales Surtax
Major Road System Projects Proposed Scope Preliminary
(by Seminole County) Cost
Estimate
State Road System
SR 434
From: Orange County Line Six-Lane (1 )
To: SR 436
SR 415
From: SR 46 Four-Lane (1 )
To: Volusia County Line
US Highway 17/92 $ 8.0 M (2)
From: Orange County Line Curb & Gutter
To: Lake of the Woods Boulevard
US Highway 17/92 $38.2 M (2)
From: Shepard Road Six-Lane
To: Lake Mary Boulevard.
US Highway 17/92 & SR 436 Interchanqe $48.3 M (2)
SR 434
From: Montgomery Road Six-Lane AndlOr Traffic Ops $74.3 M (2)
To: CR 427
SR 436 & Red Bug Lake Road Interchange $35.0 M (2)
US 17-92 lake Front Roadway Protective Reconstruction (This is $ 2.9 M
a cost-shared project with the City
of Sanford; project will also have
- other funding, including
approximately $5.4 M through -
FOOT. )
(1) Assumes funding through other sources including, but not limited to, the Transportation Outreach
Program (TOPS). Cost estimates are $10.4 M for SR 434 and $10.0 M for SR 415. .
(2) The costs shown are /1100%/1 estimates based upon various scope parameters for the contemplated
improvements. Implementation of the aggregate of these State Road projects would be contingent upon
successful acquisition of an assumed overall 50% State Match.
Major County Road Multi-lanings
Dean Road
From: Orange County Line
To: SR 426 Four Lane $30.0 M
CR 419 Arterial Projects
From~ Orange County Line
To: Chuluota Bypass
S:\Special Projects\1 Cent Sales Tax\EXHIBIT B.doclOS/08/01/8:02 AM
1 of 2
EXHIBIT B
1 % Local Government Infrastructure Sales Surtax
Major Road System Projects Proposed Scope Preliminary
(by Seminole County) Cost
Estimate
Pedestrian Overpasses
Red Bug lake Road School-Related Overpass $ 4.0 M
lake Mary Boulevard 2 Overpasses $ 8.0 M
(1 School-Related)
Future location Ove rpass $ 4.0 M
County/City Cost - Shared Projects
Altamonte Springs
North of SR 436 Pedestrian Overpass (This is up to $ 2.0 M
a 50% Share, capped at $2 M.)
Casselberry
US 17-92!Triplet Lake Drive Pedestrian Overpass (This is up to $1.5 M
a 50% Share, capped at $1.5 M.)
Oviedo
Major Widenings See City list in Exhibit C for project $ 6.0 M
. SR 426 details. (This is contemplated to
(from SR 434 to Winter be up to a 50% match per project.)
Springs Boulevard)
. East CR 419/PH I
(from SR 434 to a point east of
Division Street)
Totallncludinq State Match $262.2 M
Total NET of State Match $160.3 M
Contingency Other improvements may be done $40.1 M
if revenues and actual costs on
projects identified above allow.
Candidate examples include
intersections of County Arterials
with State Roads such as US 17-
92/CR 46-A, and additional
County/City cost-shared projects
such as East CR 419/PH II (from a
point east of Division Street to
Lockwood Boulevard, which would
complete the widening of East CR
419).
TOTAL $200.4 M
S:\Special Projects\1 Cent Sales Tax\EXHIBIT B.doc/05/0B/01/B:02 AM
2 of 2
EXHIBIT C
1 % Local Government Infrastructure Sales Surtax
Transportation Projects
(By the Seven Cities and Seminole County)
AL T AMONTE SPRINGS
Project Proposed Scope Preliminary
Cost
Estimate
Douglas Avenue Widen Douglas Avenue between SR 436 and Central $3.242 M
Parkway to a 3-lane urban section to reduce conflicts
created by turninq vehicles.
Jamestown Boulevard Widen Jamestown Boulevard between Montgomery $3.918 M
Road and SR 434 to three lanes and consider
realiqnment to Sand Lake Road.
Gateway Drive Construct new 4-lane roadway between Albermarle $3.292 M
Road and Keller Road to provide improved roadway
for vehicular traffic currently using Hillcrest.
McNorton, and Keller Road.
West Town Parkway Extension Extend West Town Parkway northeasterly from the $2.392 M
intersection of West Town Parkway and Laurel Street
to Orange Avenue. The right~of-way has been
dedicated to the City as part of the west Town Center
Development of Reqionallmpact.
Intersection Improvements SR 436 and Boston Avenue turn lanes; SR 436 and $1.465 M
Hattaway Drive turn lanes; Central Parkway and
Palm Springs southbound turn lanes; Central
Parkway and Douglas Avenue turn lanes; Central
Parkway and Montgomery Road turn lanes; SR 434
and West. Note: Funds will be in addition to
developer/DR I-related improvements.
SR 436 Corridor Feasibility Perform a Feasibility Study from SR 434 to US 17-92 $.992 M
Study to determine capacity alternatives for both
roadway/intersection, and multi-modal alternative to
enhance capacity. Note: Total cost is estimated at
- $2 million with additional funding from Transportation
Outreach Program, the County Incentive Grant
Proqram, or other state or county fundinq proqrams.
Multimodallmprovements Construct pedestrian connections between uses and $1.592 M
modes of transportation; transportation circulator
systems; and multi-modal congestion management
systems.
TOTAL $16.893 M
CASSELBERRY
Alternate Connector Seminola Boulevard to SR 434 $8 M
US 17-92 and Triplet lake Drive Intersection Improvements $1.5 M
Additional Safety and Level of Service Improvements $1.5 M
Roadway!1 ntersection
Improvements
TOTAL $11 M*
*TOT AL exceeds projected share ($9.278 M) for the City. If/as necessary, balance of project costs would be
funded throuqh other leqally available city revenues.
S:\Special ProjectS\1 Cent SalesTax\EXHIBIT C.doc/05/08/01/8:03 AM
1 of 9
EXHIBIT C
1 % Local Government Infrastructure Sales Surtax
LAKE MARY
Project Proposed Scope Preliminary
Cost
Estimate
Sand Pond Road; Skyline Drive East of Greenwood Boulevard to Emma Oaks Trail;
urban road improvements with closed drainage. $4.076 M
Evansdale Road I Pine Tree Sidewalk and drainage improvements. $.622 M
Road
TOTAL $4.698 M
LONGWOOD
Dirt Road Paving East Warren Ave.; East Bay Ave.; East Pine Ave.; $5.636 M
Oleander St.; Myrtle S1.; Oak St.; Longwood St.;
Jessup Ave.; Magnolia Ave.; Ridge S1.; Oak Lane;
Credo St.; Overstreet Ave.; Hardy S1.; Woodcock S1.;
Evergreen Ave.; Tullis Ave.; Oxford St.; Florida Ave.;
Rosedale Ave.; Lakeview Dr.
TOTAL $5.636 M
S:\Special Proiects\1 Cent Sales Tax\EXHIBIT C.doc/OS/08/01/8:03 AM
2 .of 9
EXHIBIT C
1 % Local Government Infrastructure Sales Surtax
OVIEDO
Project Proposed Scope Preliminary
Cost
Estimate
INTENDED PROJECTS: IN PRIORITY ORDER
Franklin Street/Division Street/ Construction of Franklin Street - Lake Jesup Avenue $.3 M
CR 426 to the intersection of Division Street and CR 426, and
reconstruct Division Street from the same
intersection to CR 419. ' Also, improvements to the
intersection.
Lindsay Lane Extension Division Street (Central) to SR 434; construct road. $.7 M
North/South One-way Pairs Construct North/South one-way pairs in downtown $1.8 M
area using Garden Street, Station Street, and
Railroad Street; and realign Geneva Road
intersection @ RR Crossina.
CANDIDATE PROJECTS: IN PRIORITY ORDER
SR 426 Widening Construct two additional lanes from SR 434 to Winter
Springs Boulevard (including purchasing for offsite
retention/detention). Total Project Cost Estimate: $8
M, which includes match from the County/City Cost - $4M
Shared Projects component of the Major Road
System Program shown in Exhibit B.
East CR 419 Widening Phase I; Construct two additional lanes from a point
east of Division Street to SR 434 (including
purchasing for offsite retention/detention). Total $4 M
Project Cost Estimate: $6 M, which includes match
from the County/City Cost - Shared Projects
component of the Major Road System Program
shown in Exhibit B.
- TOTAL $10.8 M*
"TOTAL somewhat exceeds projected share ($10.790 M) for the City. If/as necessary, balance of project costs
would be funded through other legally available city revenues. Other Candidate Projects may be undertaken if
revenues a'nd/or actual costs on the projects identified above allow. Specific priorities are: widening of East CR
419 from Lockwood Blvd to a point east of Division Street (Phase II; $4 M total cost estimate); West Mitchell
Hammock widening/improvements ($7 M total cost estimate); East Mitchell Hammock widening/improvements ($8
M total cost estimate). These projects are also eligible for match from the Cost - Shared Projects component of
the Major Road System Program shown in Exhibit B.
S:\Special Projects\l Cent Sales Tax\EXHIBIT C,docI05/08/01/8:03 AM
3 of 9
EXHIBIT C
1 % Local Government Infrastructure Sales Surtax
SANFORD
Project Proposed Scope Preliminary
Cost
Estimate
Collector System North of West Widen pavement, add drainage (Including: White $3.701 M
SR46 Cedar Avenue, Church Street, others)
Mulberry Avenue Extension 14m Street to Country Club Road; $1 .194 M
new extension - 2 lane urban section.
Downtown Circulation Location and scope - TBD by study. $1.790 M
Improvements
Intersection Improvements Add turn lanes, upgrade signals, align lanes, add $3.164 M
Ped X-Walks etc. to hiQh accident intersections.
Lakefront Roadway Protective Reconstruction $2.388 M
Sidewalks Rehabilitate deficient sidewalk installations and add $2.568 M
Existinq and New to citywide network, based on plan.
Upgrade Railroad CrossinQs Miscellaneous locations. $.895 M
TOTAL $15.7 M
WINTER SPRINGS
Town Center Collectors Hickory Grove; Spine Road $1.7 M
Traffic Signal Installations $.9 M
Moss Road Reconstruction $1.3 M
SR 419/SR 434 Intersection improvements $.2 M
Arterial Lighting SR 434; SR 419; Tuskawilla Road $.959 M
New Sidewalks $.5 M
SR 434 Reconstruction; Intersection improvements $1.5 M
(Includes Villaqe Walk)
Residential Road $1.6 M
Reconstruction & Traffic
Calming
Ranchlands Dirt Road $1.4 M
Alternative Surface Treatment
Fisher Road Improvements $.725 M
Winter Springs Boulevard Reconstruction; Turn Lanes $1.8 M
Bahama Road Improvements $.4 M
.
TOTAL $12.984 M
S:\Special Projects\1 Cent Sales Tax\EXHIBIT C.doc/05/08/01/8:03 AM
4 of 9
EXHIBIT C
1 % Local Government Infrastructure Sales Surtax
SEMINOLE COUNTY
Major County Projects/Collector Reconstructs
Project Proposed Scope Preliminary
Cost
Estimate
CR 426 Division Street to Snow Hill Road; pave 5' shoulders $ .75 M
Marty/Nancy & Cadillac W. Cadillac to W. Lake Brantley Rd; pave roadways $ .50 M
with drainaQe imo.
Sabal Palm Drive Wekiva Springs Rd. to 1300 ft. north; rebuild road $ .25 M
with structural imo.
Deleon Street Florida Avenue to Howard Avenue; rebuild road/12' $1.06 M
travel lanes
General Hutchinson US 17-92 to 300' west of intersection; repair guardrail $ .13 M
and include a turn lane
Longwood-Lake Mary Road CR 427 to Green Way Blvd.; pave 5' shoulders $ .31 M
Longwood-Lake Mary Road Humphrey Rd. to Green Way Blvd.; rebuild road with $ .45 M
3 lane section
Lake Way Drive Greenwood Blvd. to Longwood-Lake Mary Rd.; $ .30 M
rebuild road with sidewalks
Old Mims Road SR 46 to CR 426; rebuild road $ .30 M
Longwood-Markham Road Markham Road to SR 46; reconstruct to 12' travel $ .50 M
lanes. and shoulders
Markham Road Longwood Markham Road to Orange Boulevard; $ .63 M
reconstruct to 12' travel lanes, and shoulders
CR 431 (Orange Boulevard) CR 46-A to SR 46; reconstruct to 12' travel lanes, $ .56 M
and shoulders ,-
Snow Hill Road Brumley Road to SR 46; pave 5' shoulder $ .19 M
County Home Road US 17-92 to Hospital Road; median turn lane $ .50 M
CR 426 CR 419 to Division Street; median turn lane $1 .00 M
Celery Avenue US 17-92 to SR 415; retrofit improvements $2.50 M
Country Club Road @ Mayfair; rebuild road $ .38 M
Beardall Avenue- Kentucky Street to SR 46; retrofit & rebuild roadway $ .94 M
Intersection Improvements CR 415/Celery Avenue; Lake Mary Boulevard @ $2.59 M
... Longwood Lake Mary Road; McCulloch Road @
Lockwood Boulevard; CR 426 @ Lake Charm; CR
426 @ Snowhill Road; Lake Mills Road @ CR 419;
Slavia Road @ SR 426
Various Roadway Retrofits, New Tribes; Brisson Avenue; Red Bug Lake Road;
including culvert /channel and First Street; Penelope Road; Sipes Avenue; Rand $3.54 M
safety rehabs Yard; Slavia Road; Richmond Avenue; Sand Dollar;
Pine Way; Bass
S:\Special ProjectS\1 Cent Sales Tax\EXHIBIT C.doc/05/08/01/8:03 AM
5 of 9
EXHIBIT C
1 % Local Government Infrastructure Sales Surtax
Project Proposed Scope Preliminary
Cost
Estimate
Paving of Various Roadways Includes paving dirt roads requiring major associated $2.50 M
drainage:
Intended:
Palm Springs Road - SR 434 to dead end; S.
Beardall Avenue - Kentucky Street to dead end
Candidate:
Lazy Acres Lane - eastern connector Longwood Hills
Road to western connector Lonawood Hills Road
Other Projects Intended: (Various Structure Replacements) $3.52 M
Palm Way/Mellonville Rd.; Palm Way; Pine Way;
Cameron Ave. S; Wekiva Springs Rd.; Kentucky St.
Candidates:
Horselovers Lane Outfall; Spring Lake Outfall; Elder
Creek/C15; Cassel Creek Blvd.; SR 436 box culvert;
Elder ditch;' Beth & Tangelo Dr./46A Outfall; Lincoln
Heights; Red Bug Lk. Rd., E. of SR 436; Oxford Rd.;
Loch Arbor; W. Crystal Dr.; Nebraska Ave.; Borrow
Area, W. of 1-4; Jewitt culverts; Old Monroe culvert;
Virginia Dr.; Eagle Pass Rd.; Alder Ave.; Baymeadow
Rd.; Lochart-Smith, SR 46 to 1-4; Michigan Ave.
Outfall; Delaware St.; Willow Ave.; Brisson Ave.;
Alhambra
Total $23.40 M
Collector Safet J and Capacity Enhancement Proiects
Markham Woods Road EE Williamson Road to Springs Landing Boulevard; $1.0 M
median turn lane
Lake Emma Road Lake Mary. Boulevard to Sand Pond Road; raised $1.5 M
medians & install curb includes LMB intersection eval
& imp.
We kiva Springs Road Wekiva Lane to Sabal Palm Drive; raised medians & $2.25 M
install curb
We kiva Springs Road Fox Valley Drive to County Line; add raised median $1.5 M
with turn lanes
Lake Mary Boulevard 1500' E of Rinehart Road to US 17-92; Pavement $4.75 M
rehab/traffic lanes improvements
Bear Lake Road SR 436 to Orange County Line; roadway retrofit, incl. $1.0 M
drainaae
E. Lake Brantley Road Wekiva Springs Road to SR 434; retrofit Roadway $ .75 M
with drainaae and sidewalk
Markham Woods Road EE Williamson road to Lake Mary Boulevard; rebuild $1.75 M
road with median turn lane section
Markham Woods Road Lake Mary Boulevard to Markham Road; pave 5' $ .5 M
shoulders
Total $15.00 M
S:\Special Projects\1 Cent Sales Tax\EXHIBIT C.doc/05/08/01/8:03 AM
6 of 9
EXHIBIT C
1 % Local Government Infrastructure Sales Surtax
County Sidewalk Program
Project Proposed Scope Preliminary
Cost
Estimate
Program based on Seminole Address sidewalk gaps within 2-mile school radius $40 M
County Sidewalk Inventory along Countywide Arterial/Collector Roadways
Needs Assessment Report [including inside Cities], and along Local
Unincorporated Area Roads.
(Berryman & Henigar, 2000) Arterial/Collector, -167 lineal miles @ -$24 M
Intended Examples:
North/Charlotte St. - CR 427 to Raymond; W. Lake
Brantley - SR 436 to Marty Blvd.; Dike Rd. - Bassin
Lane to Princess Gate Blvd.; Raymond Ave. - North
St. to SR 434; Old Lake Mary Rd. - Palmeto St. to
Airport Blvd.; Longwood Hills Rd. - Lake Emma Rd.
to CR 427
Unincorporated Local, primarily Non-Sudivision,
-182 lineal miles @ -$16 M (-25% of total need);
Intended Examples:
Fairview Ave.- Spring St. to North St.; Lake Reservoir
Lane - Live Oak Blvd to dead end; Magnolia Dr. -
Aim Dr. to Manor Ave.; Railroad Ave. - SR 434 to
dead end
Total $40 M
Traffic Operations/Safety
School Circulation Projects Keeth Elementary/Indiana Trail Middle $1.6 M
Lake Mary Elementary
Greenwood Lake Middle School
Oviedo High School ,
Lake Howell High School
Carillon Elementary/Lawton Chiles Middle
Wilson Elementary
Lake Mary High School
Woodlands Elementary
- Heathrow Elementary
Sterling Park Elementary
Stenstrom Elementary
S:\Special Projects\1 Cent Sales Tax\EXHIBIT C.doc/05/08/01/8:03 AM
7 of 9
EXHIBIT C
1 % Local Government Infrastructure Sales Surtax
Project Proposed Scope Preliminary
Cost
Estimate
Traffic Safety & Efficiency, and Safety/efficiency projects are generated from crash $6 M
Railroad Highway Crossings histories and traffic concerns reported by the
citizens. Road-Railway Crossing projects are
generated based upon reported rough crossings
and lack of safety gates at some crossings.
Intended Proiects:
Turn Lanes
McCulloch Rd. @ Lockwood Blvd.; L.k. Mary Blvd.
@ Lk. Emma Rd.; Bear Gully Rd. @ Old Howell
Branch Rd.; Markham Wds. Rd. s. of Heathrow
Elem.; Old Geneva Rd. near Osceola Rd.; CR 426
@ Oklahoma St.; Snowhill Rd. @ Wilderness Trail;
CR 426 @ Van Arsdale St.
Intersection Improvements
SR 436 @ Bear Lk. Rd.; Orange Blvd @ Markham
Rd.; CR 426 @ Old Mims; Old Lockwood @
McCulloch Rd.; CR 426 @ Wilderness Trail/Barr St.
Gates, Signals, or Rubberize Crossings
RR Crossings on Hester Ave.; S. Sanford Ave.
.Other Improvements
McCulloch Rd. e. of SR 434-median imp.; Celery
Ave. w of SR 415-geometric imp.
Candidate Proiects:
Turn Lanes
Oregon Ave. @ CR 46A
Gates, Signals, or Rubberize Crossings
RR Crossings on Bear Lake Rd.; Southwest Ave.;
Plumosa Ave.; Leonard Ave.; 18th St.; Merritt St.;
Osprey Tr.; C-15 @ Orange Blvd.
Intersection Improvements
Orange Blvd. @ C15; SR 46 @ Longwood
Markham; CR 426 @ CR 419; SR 46 @ Upsala Rd.;
- Orange Blvd. @ Wayside; Myrtle lake Hill @ EE
Williamson; CR 426 @ SR 46; SR 426 @ Dean Rd.
Other Improvements
Palm @ Oakhurst-Radii Imp.; US 17/92-County
Home Road to N. Bush-access mgmt.; Bush Blvd.
@ College Dr.-partial access; CR427 @ SR 434-
median mod.
S:\Special Proiects\1 Cent Sales Tax\EXHIBIT C.doc/05/08/01/8:03 AM
8 of 9
EXHIBIT C
1 % Local Government Infrastructure Sales Surtax
Project Proposed Scope Preliminary
Cost
Estimate
Traffic Signals & Signal This category of projects includes design and $5.5 M
Systems construction of new signals as warranted; and
reconstruction of existing signals.
Intended:
Convert to Mast Arm
SR 46 @ Rinehart Rd.; SR 46 @ Orange Blvd; Red
Bug Lake Rd. (9 locations); SR 436 @ US 17/92; SR
436 @ Howell Branch Rd.; SR 436 (6 locations);
Howell Branch Rd. (5 locations); SR 434 @
Tuskawilla
New Signals
SR 415 @ CR 415; County Home Road @ CR 427
Traffic Communication Network Expansion and capacity improvement of the multi- $2 M
use fiber optic communication network.
Wekiva Springs Rd.- SR 434 to Hunt Club Blvd.; CR
427 - SR 434 to SR 436; SR 426 - Mitchell '
Hammock to Howell Branch Rd.; US 17/92 -
Spartan to County Line; SR 434 - McCulloch to
Tuskawilla; SR 46 - US 17/92 to SR 426; SR 46 -
CR 431 to Lake Markham; Lk. Emma Rd. - Lk.
Mary Blvd. to Sand Pond; CR 419 - CR 426 to
County Line; SR 415 - SR 46 to Celery Ave.; Bear
Lk. Rd. - SR 436 to Dutch Elm; SR 436 - Balmy
Beach to Cassleton
ITS/ATMS Traffic Management System updates to the next $5 M
generation traffic control system. Basic elements of
the system include the new NTCIP compatible traffic
control system, motorist information system,
detection and monitoring stations, incident
management system, regional traffic information
sharing system, etc.
-
Traffic Calming Design and installation of traffic calming features on $1.5 M
neighborhood roadways to address speeding and
cut-throuah issues.
Total $21.6 M
Seminole County Projects SUB TOTAL $100 M
Contingency $ 24.4 M
TOTAL $124.4 M
S:\Special Projects\1 Cent Sales Tax\EXHIBIT C.doc/05/08/01/8:03 AM
9 of 9
EXHIBIT 0
1 % Local Government Infrastructure Sales Surtax
Distribution of Net Revenues Under
Interlocal Agreement Section 2(d)
Altamonte Springs 3.161237374 0/0
Casselberry 1.736302049 0/0
Lake Mary .87916159 0/0
Longwood 1.054641046 0/0
Oviedo 2.019201958 0/0
Sanford 2.938032649 0/0
Winter Springs 2.429702603 ok
Seminole County 23.281720798 0/0
Total [per Section 2(d)]
37.5 0/0
Notes:
· Revenue received monthly by Seminole County
· Upon receipt of monthly revenue distribution from the State Department of Revenue,
the applicable % for each municipal jurisdiction will be promptly recorded in a distinct
interest-bearing account by Seminole County.
S:\Special ProjectS\1 Cent Sales Tax\EXHIBIT D.doc/05/08/01/8:03 AM
1 of 1
10-Year Seminole County
Entity Distribution Prelimina~ Program Recap
Projection I
. School Board 25% $133.593 M See Exhibit A to Interlocal for Project List
. Seminole Co., for 37.5% $200.390M See Exhibit B to Interlocal for Specific Project List
Co-Wide Road State Road System - $104.8 M
Systems (e.g., U.S. Hwy. '17/92, State Road 434, etc.)
(including inside Cities)
Major Co. 4-Lane Arterial Projects - $30 M
(Le., Dean Road, County Road 419)
(including inside Cities)
Pedestrian Overpasses - $16 M
(e.g., Red Bug Lake Road, lake Mary Blvd., etc.)
(including inside Cities)
Co./City Cost-Shared Projects - $9.5 M
- Contingency - $40.1 tvf3)
. Transp./Shared Among 7 Cities and County21: See Exhibit C to Interlocal for Specific Project Lists
~ Altamonte Springs 3.161237374% $16.893 M
~ Casselberry 1 .736302049% $ 9.278 M
~ Lake Mary .879161590% $ 4.698 M
~ Longwood 1.054641046% $ 5.636 M
~ Oviedo 2.019201958% $10.790 M
~ Sanford 2.938032649% $15.700M
~ Winter Springs 2.429702603% $12.984 M
~ Seminole County 23.281720798% $124.411 M Major Co. Projects/
Collector Reconstructs - $38.4 M
(e.g. longwood/lake Mary Road, Lake
Emma Road, etc.) (including sections inside Cities)
-
Traffic Ops/Safety - $21.6 M
(e.g, School Circulation projects, County Road 426,
Markham Woods Road, Various
Signalization/lntersection Improvements. etc.)
Co. Sidewalk Program - $40 M
(-60% of $ estimated for gaps along Countywide
Arterial/Collector Roadways including inside Cities;
-40% of $ estimated for gaps along Local
Unincorporated Area Roads)
Contingency - $24.4 Ml)l
SUBTOTAL 37.5% $200.390 M
TOTAL 100% $534.373M
SUMMARY REVENUE DISTRIBUTIO~ ATTACHMENT NO.2
"2nd Generation" 1 ft Local Option Infrastructure Sales Tax
PURPOSES: For Education (%) And Transportation (3/4) ,
(1) Revenue projection in current (2000/01) dollars. with an annual population/ sales growth factor ranging from 2-2.5%. Projection is not
inclusive of inflation or interest income, nor constrained to any local "build-out" projection.
(2) Based on State Y2i Sales Tax distribution formula. using Census 2000 results as released 3/28/01.
(3) Contingency treatment optional by jurisdiction; -20% from revenue projection used by Seminole County.
F:\SHARED\Special Projects\1 Cent Sales Tax\DistributionAlt5.doc/4/27/01 2:17 PM