Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006 02 27 Regular Item 308 West End Professional Center CITY COMMISSION ITEM 308 Regular X February 27.2006 Meeting MGR.DEPT Authorization - REQUEST: The Community Development Department- Planning Division requests that the Commission review the conceptual plan for the West End Professional Center. PURPOSE: The developer has requested the City Commission review and approve the attached concept plan for the purpose of granting development rights for 46,380 square feet of professional office space and 139 parking spaces in accordance with the attached concept plan subject to staff and City Commission approval of the final engineering documents, development agreement, and aesthetic review. APPLICABLE LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY: Chapter 9 of the City Code Sections 20-320 through 20-327 ofthe City Code. CHRONOLOGY: January 2006 - Pre-application review January 20,2006 - City received application for conceptual review by the Staff Review Committee. February 7,2006 - Staff Review Committee meeting for conceptual review. February 15, 2006 - Response to Staff Review Committee comments received. CONSIDERATIONS: Overview: Subsection 20-321 (b) (1) ofthe [Town Center] Code states that the City Commission (in its capacity as the development review committee for developments with in the Town Center) "shall have authority within reason for approving all aspects of site planning and exterior architecture, including aesthetic appropriateness.. . and other site specific matters not delineated herein." The applicant has requested that the City Commission review and approve the attached concept plan for the purpose of granting development rights for 46,380 square feet of professional office space and 139 parking spaces in accordance with the attached concept plan, subject to staff and City Commission approval of the final engineering documents, development agreement, and February 27,2006 Regular Agenda Item 308 Page 2 of3 aesthetic review. The applicant proposes to construct the development in two phases, each phase consisting of 23, 190 square feet of office space and the attendant parking spaces. Review of the final engineering for phase two and the aesthetic review for both phases of the project will address the final design of the aerial connection between the two buildings. Inconsistencies with Code This is not an exhaustive list. but represents the most obvious inconsistencies. Other issues are likely to arise when the ene:ineerine: plans are submitted and reviewed. These items will be addressed as part of the review of the {"mal ene:ineerine:. the development ae:reement and the aesthetic review. Section 20-325 of the City Code stipulates a build-to-line of 0' from the ROW for SR 434. The applicant will be requesting, with staff's concurrence, that the front setback on SR 434 be increased as shown on the Concept Plan, that the side yard setbacks be reduced as shown, and the distance between buildings be allowed as shown on the Concept Plan with the addition of the aerial connection between buildings when Phase Two is constructed. The applicant contends (and staff agrees) that the site would be enhanced by locating the buildings farther way from to the SR 434 ROW to accommodate an urban plaza in front of the building fac;ade. The applicant will request the use of the 30' right of way along the south property line for onsite retention, parking, buffer wall, and landscaping buffer. The applicant will address the comments from Dover-Kohl relative to certain architectural enhancements to the building architecture as part of the aesthetic review. One (1) handicapped parking space must be added to the overall plan. Staff suggests this space be added as part of Phase One. Parking: The concept plan shows 67 parking spaces in Phase I for 23,190 gross square feet (GSF), 21,060 net square feet (NSF) "Core Building," and 16,170 NSF lease square feet. The parking ratios translate to 2.9 spaces per 1000 square feet on a GSF basis, 3.18 on the "core building basis," and 4.14 on the NSF lease basis. Staff's recommended guideline is 3.30 per 1000 GSF, meaning that the proposed parking count is slightly lower than the City's guidelines, but within the normal range for office buildings. For example, the ITE Parking Generation manual uses 2.84 spaces per 1000 square feet on a GSF basis. If the relatively high gross to lease ratio (about 28%) is factored in, and the confirmation from a tenant who will occupy two floors of the building that they are satisfied with the amount of parking is considered, staff can support this parking plan. 2 February 27,2006 Regular Agenda Item 308 Page 3 00 FINDINGS: 1. The proposed development is located within the Winter Springs Town Center District and has a Town Center FLU designation. 2. The attached development concept plan appears consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, but requires deviations from the City Code. 3. Any deviations from the Code must be addressed through a development agreement, special exception, or some other appropriate mechanism as approved by the City Attorney. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Commission approve the attached concept plan, subject to any deviations from the Code being addressed. Those deviations that warrant approval must be addressed through an appropriate legal mechanism (e.g. development agreement). ATTACHMENTS: A Concept Plan B. Conceptual Building Elevation COMMISSION ACTION: 3 West end north elevation WEST END PROFESSIONAL CENTER ONE WINTER SPRINGS, FL CARL M. NAPOLITANO ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN WEST END PROFESSIONAL CENTER ONE WINTER SPRINGS, FL CARL M. NAPOLITANO ELEVATIONS