The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2001 03 26 Public Hearings D Second Reading - Ordinance 2001-23 Traffic Circulation Element .).~ f:,.. II oj, ~ COMMISSION A.GENDA ITEM D Consent Informational Public Hearing X Regular March 26, 2001 Meeting ~Attor I 41 Authorization REQUEST: The Community Development Department - Planning Division requests the City Commission hold a public hearing for second reading of Ordinance 2001-23 to adopt the large scale comprehensive plan amendment (LS-CP A-6-00) that would replace completely the current text and maps in the Traffic Circulation Element Volume 1 of 2 and Volume 2 of 2 of the City's Comprehensive Plan. PURPOSE: The purpose of this Agenda Item is to request the Commission hold a public hearing for second reading of Ordinance 2001-23 to replace completely the current text and maps in the Traffic Circulation Element Volume 1 of 2 and Volume 2 of 2 of the City's Comprehensive Plan due to the need to update the Traffic Circulation Element. APPLICABLE LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY: The provisions of Florida Statutes Chapter 163,3184(15)(b) F,S. which state: "The local governing body shall hold at least one advertised public hearing on the proposed comprehensive plan or plan amendment as follows: 1, The first public hearing shall be held at the transmittal stage pursuant to subsection (3), It shall be held on a weekday at least 7 days after the day that the advertisement is published. COD/March 19,2001/2:46 PM r.,. /.11,.,; MARCH 26, 2001 PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM D Page 2 2. The second public hearing shall be held at the adoption stage pursuant to subsection (7), It shall be held on a weekday at least 5 days after the day that the second advertisement is published," The provisions of 166,041(3)(a) which state in part: "Except as provided in paragraph (c), a proposed ordinance may be read by title, or in full, on at least 2 separate days and shall, at least 10 days prior to adoption, be noticed once in a newspaper of general circulation in the municipality," CONSIDERA TIONS: . The Traffic Circulation Element should be updated based on the results of the City of Winter Springs Transportation Study prepared by CPH Engineering, Inc" The preparation of Supplement # 1 prepared December, ] 999 was necessary because the Town Center Concept had been adopted since the Study was completed. . The City Attorney concerned about potential procedural difficulties (the time period between initial review by the Local Planning Agency, the ORC Report, and the second public hearing by the City Commission), had recommended commencing the plan amendment process again, The large scale plan amendment process was begun again. . The LP A previously recommended transmittal at its March 22, 2000 meeting upon reviewing the ORC Report recommending adoption by the Commission, City staff recommended that the plan amendments be forwarded to DCA for approval. . The first (transmittal) public hearing is a forum in which the governing body votes to either transmit the proposed large scale comprehensive plan amendment to the Florida Department of Community Affairs and the other state agencies and regional planning council to request their professional review and recommendations on the plan amendment. The ORC (objections, recommendations and comments) Report will be sent to the City within two (2) months from the date that the plan amendment submittal is found sufficient as a transmittal. . CPH Engineering, Inc, has provided the necessary response (as Supplement #2 "Update to City of Winter Springs Transportation Study") to the ORC Report relating to the proposed plan amendment LS-CP A-6-00, . The Local Planning Agency at its March 7,2001 meeting reviewed the ORC Report and the Response to the ORC Report and made its recommendation to the City Commission. COD/March 19,2001/2:46 PM None. MARCH 26, 2001 PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM D Page 3 . On March 21,2001, the Commission approved the first reading of Ordinance 2001-23 to adopt the large scale comprehensive plan amendment (LS-CP A-6-00) that would replace completely the current text and maps in the Traffic Circulation Element Volume 1 of 2 and Volume 2 of 2 of the City's Comprehensive Plan, FINDINGS: . A number of changes have occurred since the preparation and adoption (on April 27, 1992) of the City's Comprehensive Plan, prompting the need for an update of the Traffic Circulation Element. . The City initiated comprehensive plan amendment updates the Traffic Circulation Element Data, Inventory & Analysis (Volume 1 of2) and the Goals, Objectives and Policies (Volume 2 of2). . The comprehensive plan amendment is compatible with the other elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan, . The comprehensive plan amendment is compatible with and furthers the State Comprehensive Plan, in Chapter 187 F,S, . The comprehensive plan amendment is compatible with and furthers elements of the East Central Florida Comprehensive Regional Policy Plan (aka Strategic Regional Policy Plan). FISCAL IMPACT: IMPLEMENTA TION SCHEDULE: A public hearing for second reading and adoption of Ordinance 2001-23 is scheduled for March 26,2001, The ordinance would become effective after 21 days of the issue of "Notice of Intent" by the Florida Department of Community Affairs to find the large scale comprehensive plan amendment in compliance, [ref: 163,3184(10)(a) F,S.] CDD/March 19,2001/5:02 PM MARCH 26, 2001 PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM D Page 4 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Commission hold a public hearing for second reading and adoption of Ordinance 2001-23 to replace completely the current text and maps in the Traffic Circulation Element Volume 1 of 2 and Volume 2 of 2 of the City's Comprehensive Plan, incorporating the City staff and the Local Planning Agency's Findings, and the Response to the ORC Report as the basis for the adoption of the plan amendment. LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY RECOMMENDATION: The Local Planning Agency at its March 7,2001 meeting recommended the City Commission approve the proposed plan amendment to replace completely the current text and maps in the Traffic Circulation Element Volume 1 of2 and Volume 2 of2 of the City's Comprehensive Plan, incorporating the City staff and the Local Planning Agency's Findings, and the Response to the ORC Report as the basis for the adoption of the plan amendment. ATTACHMENTS: A. Ordinance 2001-23 B, Ad in Orlando Sentinel ORC Report for Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment LS-CP A-6-00, [ See Local Planning Agency Agenda Item II, H, Attachment 1 ] Response to the ORC Report for LS-CP A-6-00 [ See Local Planning Agency Agenda Item II, H. Attachment 2 ] LS-CP A-6-00 Plan Amendment Original Data & Analysis Submission Included in the Transmittal to the Florida Department of Community Affairs, [ See Local Planning Agency Agenda Item II. H. Attachment 3 ] COMMISSION ACTION: CDD/March 19,2001/2:46 PM ATTACHMENT A ORDINANCE NO. 2001-23 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELATING TO LARGE SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO UPDATE THE TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ELEMENT VOLUMES 1 AND 2; BY COMPLETELY REPLACING ALL TEXT AND MAPS IN THE TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ELEMENT; PURSUANT TO 163.3184(15(b) AND 166.041, FLORIDA STATUTES; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF PRIOR INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCORPORATION INTO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND LEGAL STATUS OF THE PLAN AMENDMENTS. I . WHEREAS, sectIOn 163.3161 et. seq., Florida Statutes (1987) established the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act; and WHEREAS, section 163.3167, Florida Statutes, requires each municipality in the State of Florida to prepare and adopt a Comprehensive Plan as scheduled by the Florida Department of Community Affairs; aq.d WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency of the City of Winter Springs held a duly noticed public hearing, in accordance with the procedures in chapter 163, part II, Florida Statutes, on the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments and considered findings and advice of the staff, citizens, and all interested parties submitting written and oral comments and has recommended adoption to the City Commission; and WHEREAS, on November 13,2001, the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment and considered findings and advice of the Land Planning Agency, staff, citizens, and all interested parties submitting City of Winter Springs Ordinance No, 2001-23 Page I of 5 written and oral comments, and after complete deliberation, approved the amendment for transmittal to the Florida Department of Community Affairs; and WHEREAS, on January 26, 2001, the Florida Department of Community Affairs issued its Objections, Recommendations, and Comments Report ("ORC Report") to the City and made recommendations to bring the subject Comprehensive Plan amendments in compliance with Rule 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code, and Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, the City Commission and the Land Planning Agency have evaluated the ORC Report and have accepted the recommendations contained therein by making the necessary modifications to the Comprehensive Plan amendments originally transmitted to the Florida Department of Community Affairs in order to bring the amendments in compliance with Rule 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code, and Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, pursuant to section 9J-ll.006, Florida Administrative Code, -this Comprehensive Plan amendment will not cause the City to exceed its twice yearly submittal allowance for comprehensive plan anlendmet:lts; and WHEREAS, on March 26,2001, the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs held a duly noticed public adoption hearing on the proposed amendments set forth hereunder and considered findings and advice of the Land Planning Agency, staff, citizens, and all interested parties submitting written and oral comments and supporting data and analysis, as well as the Objections, Recommendations, and Comments of the Florida Department of Community Affairs, and after complete deliberation, approved and adopted the proposed amendments hereunder; and WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan amendments adopted by this Ordinance comply with City of Winter Springs Ordinance No. 2001-23 Page 2 of 5 the requirements of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act and the amendments are in the best interests ofthe public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Winter Springs, Florida; and WHEREAS, the City needs to update the Traffic Circulation Element based on the results of the recently completed City of Winter Springs Transportation Study prepared by CPH Engineering, Inc. The contents of the study are intended to completely replace the current text and maps in the Traffic Circulation Element Volumes I and 2. Furthermore, the Town Center zoning project, that was recently adopted by the City Commission since the study was completed, necessitated amendments to the Traffic Circulation Element. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are fully incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2. Authority. This Ordinance is adopted in compliance with, and pursuant to, the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulations Act, sections 163.184 and 163.187, Florida Statutes. Section 3. Purpose and Intent. It is hereby declared to be the purpose and intent of this Ordinance to clarify, expand, correct, update, modify and otherwise further the provisions of the City of Winter Springs' Comprehensive Plan. Section 4. Adoption of Amendments to Comprehensive Plan. The City of Winter Springs' Comprehensive Plan, Traffic Circulation Element, Volumes I and 2, is hereby repealed in its entirety and replaced by Supplement No.2, Update To City of Winter Springs City of Winter Springs Ordinance No, 2001-23 Page 3 of 5 Transportation Study, February 2001, prepared by CPH Engineers, Inc., as set forth in Exhibit "1 ", which is attached hereto and fully incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. Repeal of Prior Inconsistent Ordinances and Resolutions. All prior inconsistent ordinances and resolutions adopted by the City Commission, or parts of ordinances and resolutions in conflict herewith, are hereby repealed to the extent of the conflict. Section 6. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, word or provision of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, whether for substantive, procedural, or any other reason, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinarice. Section 7. Incorporation into Comprehensive Plan. Upon the effective date of the Comprehensive Plan Amendments adopted by this ordinance, said Amendments shall be incorporated into the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan and any section or paragraph number or letter and any heading may be changed or modified as necessary to effectuate the foregoing. Section 8. Effective Date and Legal Status of the Plan Amendments. The effective date of the Comprehensive Plan Amendments adopted by this Ordinance shall be the date a final order is issued by the Florida Department of Community Affairs, or the Administration Commission finding the Amendments in compliance with section 163.3184, Florida Statutes. No development orders, development permits, or land use dependent on these Amendments may be issued or commenced before it has become effective. If a final order of noncompliance is issued by the Administration Commission, the Amendments may nevertheless be made effective by adoption of City of Winter Springs Ordinance No. 2001-23 Page 4 of 5 a resolution affirming its effective status. After and from the effective date of these Amendments, the Comprehensive Plan Amendments set forth herein shall amend the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan and become a part of that plan and the Amendments shall have the legal status of the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan, as amended. ADOPTED by the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, in a regular meeting assembled on the 26th day of March, 2001. I ) ATTEST: ~Lt uaces, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND SUFFI NCY FOR THE CITY OF WI NGS ONLY: Anthony A. Garganese, City ttorney First Reading: March 21, 2001 Second Reading: March 26, 2001 Effective Date: F:\DOCS\City of Winter Springs\Ordinances\Large Scale Comp, Plan Amendment Traffic Circulation ,wpd City of Winter Springs Ordinance No, 2001-23 Page 5 of 5 SUPPLEM~NT. NO" 2 Update To CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS TRANSPORTATION STUDY February 2001 EXHIBIT t I CPH Engineers, Inc. 1117 E. Robinson Street Orlando, Florida 32801 (407) 425-0452 CPH Project No. W0459.04 The T ransporlation Study was completed in 1997 and identified no deficiencies in the transportation infrastructure of the City of' Winter Springs' local system for the projected 2010 traffic loadings. Roadways identified for improvements included U.S. 17-92, S.R. 434, Seminola Boulevard, Lake Drive, and Tuskawilla Road which are under the control of the County and FOOT. The U.S. 17-92 six-lane improvement project from Shepard Road (Winter Springs) south to Melody Lane (Casselberry) has been completed. State Road 434 has been improved to .four lanes fr9m S.R. 419 to the Greeneway. Seminola Boulevard has been improved to four lanes; Tuskawilla Road has ., been improved to four lanes divided from Lake Drive to Red Bl,Jg and is under construction from Lake Drive north to SR 434; and Lake Drive is currently under design for. four lanes divided. This Supplement No. 2 updates the 1997 study and Supplement No. 1 to acknowledge these improvements and the ones also constructed by the City. No changes were made to the land use, eXisting uses, or projected development. We are presenting current data to allow for a comparison. of where we were in 1996 and where we are today; We can also use this data to evaluate the accuracy of our projection,s. We have also updated roadway capacities based on the FOOT 1998 Level of Service Handbook. It has become evident thala collector road system is required for the undeveloped area east of the City Hall. This area has been designated as the Town Center and is scheduled for growth within the planning period. A roadway collector system has been identified to serve this area. Since these roads are for new growth, the funding is projected to come from the transportation impact fee. This collector system is shown on the attached revised drawings. Only updated materials are attached to this supplement. Since the growth projections have not been revised, the overall traffic study remains valid.. Supplement No.2 Page 1 Supplement No.2 REVISED/UPD"ATED TABLES a'nd FIGURES :....;... .~, Page 2 Table 4A 1996/2001 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC COUNT RESULTS r RAW : AVERAGE ADJUSTED " ROADWAY FROM TO TRAFFIC COUNT ANNUAL ANNUAL COUNTS DATE FDOT ADJ. TRA FFI C - TWO-WAY 1996 FACTOR TWO-WA Y SHEPARD RD, U,S. 17-92 SH~OAH BL YD. 5279 2/13 0.99 5226 SHEOAH BLVD, SHEPARD RD, S.R, 434 2703 2/13 0.99 2676 MOSS ROAD S.R. 434 C,R.419 2620 2/13 0.99 2594 MOSS ROAD PANAMA S.R. 434 3972 2/13 0.99 3932 EDGEMON AVE. SEMINOLA PANAMA 3316 2/14 0.98 3250 EDGEMON AVE. PANAMA S.R. 434 2990 2/14 0.98 2930 EDGEMON AVE, S.R, 434 C.R.419 3314 2/13 0.99 3281 WADE STREET S,R, 434 C,R.419 623 2/13 0.98 617 DOLPHIN ROAD HA YES ROAD SHORE ROAD 2505 2/14 0.98 2455 !-IA YES ROAD . PANAMA S.R. 434 5787 2/14 0.98 567! SHORE ROAD PANAMA 'S.R. 434 436 2/14 0.98 427 TROTWOOD BLVD TUSCA WILLA NORTHERN WAY 4275 2/15 0.98 4190 TROTWOOD BLVD W,OFTUSKAWILLA 1681 2/15 0.98 1647 NORTHERN WAY WINTER SPGS BLVD TROTWOOD BLVD 2817 2/15 0.98 2761 NORTHERN WAY TROTWOOD BLVD. :VISTA WILLA 3002 2/15 0.98 2942 NORTHERN WAY WINTER SPG~ BLVD ,SHETLAND 3073 2/15 0.98 3012 NORTHERN WAY GREENBRIAR WINTER SPGS BLVD 2768 2/15 0.98 2713 VISTA WILLA NORTHERN WAY SENECA 3918 2/20 0.98 \ 3840 WINTER SPGS BLVD TUSCA WILLA NORTHERN WAY 7803 2/19 0.98 7647 WINTER SPGS BLVD NORTHERN WAY GREENBRIAR 5388 2/1'9 0.98 5280 WINTER SPG'S BLVD NORTHERN WAY NORTHERN WAY 7803 2/19 0.98 7647 WINTER SPGS BLVD NORTHERN WAY CITY LIMITS 11380 2/19 0.98 11,152 GREENBRIAR WINTER SPGS B,L VD NORTHERN WAY .. 1601 ' 2/19 0.98 1569 DYSON DRIVE TUSCA WILLA SHETLAND 1246 2/20 0.98 1221 SHETLAND CITRUS ROAD DYSON DRIVE ' 5689 2/20 0.98 5575 A L TON ROAD HA YES ROAD SHORE 1271 2/14 0.98 1246 BIRD RDfFISHER LAKE DRIVE NORTH 963 2/14 0.98 944 TUSKA WILLA S,R. 434 NORTH 4509 2/15 0.98 4419 TUSCORA NORTHERN WAY S.R. 434 2288 2/15 0.98 2242 SENECA WINTER SPGS BLVD 'hWAY 2158 2/19 0.98 2115 SENECA Yl WAY VISTA WILLA 1675 2/19 0.98 1642 J:\W0459,04\WP\TA13LE 4A:WPD TABLE 6 (Revised 2/2001) PROGRAMMED AND PLANNED HIGHWAY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS WINTER SPRINGS TRANSPORTATION STUDY AREA Roadway Se!:}ment Improvement Pro~rammed1 Planned 2," SR 419 Edgemon to Moss Turn Lanes 2002 S:R. 434 US 17-92 to SR 419 Traffic Control 2002 Lake Drive Seminola Boulevard to Add 2 Lanes 2002-2005 Tuskawilla Road " Moss Road S.R. 434 to S.R. 419 Add 2 Lanes 2000-2005 Red Bug Lak.lt. SR 436 to Eagle Circle Widen to 6 2000-2005 Rd Lanes Seminola Blvd. US 17-92 to Lake Drive Widen to 6 2015 Lanes " S.R. 434 U.S. 17-92 to S.R. 419 Add 2 Lanes 201~3 '(Removed in 4 below) (6 Total) S.R.: 434 S.R~ 419 to Eastern Add 2 Lanes 201~3' Beltway (6 Total) (Removed in 4 below) U.S. 17-92 Shepard Road to Airport' Add 2 Lanes 20102.4 Boulevard SR 426 County Line to Widen.to 6 2015 Greeneway Lanes 1. Contained in construction program of FOOT or Seminole County. 2. Contained in OUATS 2010 Plan Update (Adopted Highway.Needs Network). Not in current 2020 Long . . Range Transportation Plan Update.' . 3. Latest date based on need. This applies to all "2010" numbers in this column. 4. 2020 Long Range Transportation Plan. ...... Supplement NO.2 Page 4 Table [l lanes! lev eI 01 Serv Ice Divided A'. B" C 2 Uoovided WA N/A 9.900 ~ Div ided N/A N/A 22.900 6 Divided N/A N/A 35.500 BDivlded N/A N/A 44.700 r-~" v<b""'J.d ..... O'W., 'OO.OCC aond I..~,..O k) 0# p..,I"O _l...a" S mil.. 0.1 rh. ONn..,., CiH (""rotl bu,iIot... .:Jal..ell level 01 Servlc. A D C 0 E 4 21.200 34,300 51.500 66.200 81.700 6 32.600 52.700 79.000 101.600 125.400 8 <<.500 71.800 107.800 138.600 171.100 10 55.600 89,800 134.700 173.200 213.800 12 65,200 105,400 158.100 203,200 250,900 Group 2 "":1:".;" ~.n1itd..,.. .~d t:Ofln GrovD 11 le'al 01 Serv Ice EU' L..ne~ A D C 0 E 16.600 ~ 20.900 32.800 49,200 62.600 74.500 35.000 6 32.100 50.400 75.600 96.200 114.500 52.500 8 043..800 68.800 103.200 131,300 156.300 64.400 10 54.700 86,000 129.000 164,200 195.400 12 64.100 100.800 151,200 192,400 229.100 \ NON-STATE ROADWAYS UAJCR CJTYiCaJHTY flC100WAVS E 16.200 level 01 Serv Ic 34.300 lanes A" BOO C 51.700 2 Undiv ided N/A N/A 8.600 63.400 4 Divided N/A N1A 19.800 6 Divided N/A N/A 30.800 "TiMU1'TiD nOo'< Class I t>Q,OO ~ '.S1 '!;r.aliud lne.ru('ona J:"rNle) lanes! level 01 Service DIvided /(" B C 2 UildiYided NJA 10.800 15,,600 4 Divided NJA 23.500 . 33.200 6 Div Ided N1A 35.800 49.900 8 Divided N/A 45,300 61.400 Class II "..00 ao.uo s.l7'l".U4 :.Iu'nc~~ ft,'-',) Class III tno..INiI..so .ig'l&llz.d Ud"U<,ons pe,rni.. andnOl _INn pllltn~ clry cennl busin.,. <b.lriclolullbaniJ~ a,.. OIlI't'500.COC1 lanes! level 01 Serv ice Lanes A" B" C Divided A" B" C 0 E 2 Undivided N1A N1A 4.800 2 UndW ided N/A N/A 3.300 12.100 15.800 4 Dlvided N1A N/A 11.600 4 Divided N/A N/A 7.800 27.800 33.600 6 Divided N/A N!A 12.100 43.300 SO.500 8 Divided !'/A N/A 15.300 54.200 62,100 ADJUSTMENTS OWlOE ().1.:NOlVIOe 0 Class IV .-no.. II"~'\ ".50 liC7'a~U'd lnI.FSec'or..a ~, mil. and within pAm,,.} dry u:ttr~ bDlnu. el,,-,I ol..lt:....,iltd ,~, frit' ~.CCO, Lanes! level or Serv ice Divided A" BOO C 0 E 2 UndW ided N/A N/A 3,700 13.800 15.300 4 Divided N/A N/A 8.900 29.900 32,600 6 Divided N/A N/A ,14,000 45.500 49.000 8 Divided N/A N/A 17 .500 55,200 60.100 lanes 2 2 Mubi Mubi Median Div ide<! Undivided UndW Id~ Undiv ided CahttCDm'spon6ng tNO-way Yoh,tme .indicawod pe..:enl) len Turn J>djustmenl Bays Factors Yes +5% No -20~ y es -s~. No .25~. ONE.WAY Ca!t"correspondong ~a., "oIumelnOUled pelCtr.l) The Florida De;>artment 01 Transportation Source: Systems Planning Qlfite 605 SU\':aI1Oee 51reet . Mai Slalion 19 Tallahas. ee. Florida 32399.0450 One-Way Lanes hllp:lI.....w,dol.slale.ll.us/planning 2 3 4 5 [quinlcnl T_\V.... ._.. 4 6 8 8 Adjustment Faclors - 40':'. - 40~~ .. 40~. -25"1, ~. . . . The table does no! constilule . slan<!a'd and st.ould be used only lor seneral planning applicalions. The compt;ler models !rom v.Nth lhis lable is derived should be used 'Of more spetit.it planning .ppfoc.lions. The lable and deriving computer models should nol be used lor co,,<:o, or inlerseclion design. where more relined Iec:tv'\iques e).ist. .Values shown are 31VlcaJ aver.age daWJ voh;r;'tes (based on Kl00 'aclors. nol peak.to-daily ratios) lor levels 0' ser/ice. and are b.sed on the 1997 Update 10 the Hi~hway Ca;>acily Manual and Florida Irallie. roadway. an<! slsnail.lion dala. The tabl.'s input value assumptions and level 01 service criteria appear on Ihe IOIlO\'ing pac;e. ... Cannol be achieved. ... Volumes ale compara~le be::ause inre:section caiJ3cilies have been reached. Seplember 19~8 Supple-nent No. 2 Page !, ~ ~ J:\\V0459,04\LOS TADLE 14,WPD February 200 I TABLE 14 (Revised) (1 of 3) YEAR 2010 ROADWAY LINK LEVELS OF SERVICE WITH 2010 NETWORK (Computer Model) ROADWA Y mOM TO'. NO,OF ROADWA Y LOS 0 MODEL VIC RATIO MODEL LANES CLASS DAILY DAILY DAILY CAPACITY VOLUME LOS U,S, 1M2 S,R,4)4 SHEPARD RD, ARTERIAL 52,500 52,200 1.00 0 U,S, 17-92 SI{l!~ARD RD, S,R.419 6 ARTERIAL 52,500 55,200 1.0S F S.R,4)4 U,S. 17.~~ MOSS RD, 6 ARTl!RIAL 52,500 41,800 0,88 D S,R,434 MOSS RD, S,R.419 4 ARTERIAL 35,000 .26,900 0.75 0 S.R.4)4 S.R. 41~ TUSKAWILl.A RD ARTeRIAL )5,000 39,000 1.1 F S.ll. 4)4 TlISKAWII.I.A RD SPRING AVIiNUr. ARTeRIAl. )5,000 39..000 1.1 r- S,R,434 SPRING A VENUE EASTERN BEL TW A Y 4 ARTERUAK 35.000 41,800 1.19 F S.R, 41~ U,S, 1M2 EDGEMON AVE, 2 ARTERIAL 16,600 19,900 1.20 F S.R. 41~ EDGEMON AVE, S,R.4)4 2 ARTERIAL 16,600 16,600 1.00 D E, LAKIi DRIVE SEMINOLA BLVD FISHER ROAD COLLECTOR 31.700 21.500 0.9S D E, LAKIi DRIVE FISI.mR ROAD TUSKAWILLA RD, 4 COLLECTOR 31,700 22,600 1.00 D TUSKAWILLA RD.. Rl!D RUG LK RD EAGLE BLVD, 6 ARTERIAL 48,900 39,500 0.83 D T!ISKAWILI.A 1m, EAGI.E ALVD, Eo LAKE DRIVE ARTERIAL 35,000 35.500 1.0 D TUSKAWILLA RD. E. LAKE DRIVE WrNTERSPGS. BLVD 4 ARTERIAL 35,000 25,200 0.71 0 TUSKAWILLA RD. WINTER SPGS BLVD TROTWOODBLVD ARTERIAL 35,000 20,700 0.60 C TUSKAWILLA RD, TROTWOOD BLVD. S,R. 43~ 4 ARTERIAL 35,000 20.200 0,57 C SHEPARD RD, U.S. 17-92 SHEOAH BLVD, COLLECTOR 10,900 11.200 1.03 E SHEPARD RD, SHEOAH BLVD, EDGEMON Ava 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 7,900 0.72 0 SHEOAH BLVD, SHEPARD RD. S.R. 434 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 8.400 0.77 0 BAHAMA ROAD HA YES ROAD WINDING HOLLOW BL 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 100 0,01 C MOSS ROAD PANAMA ROAD DOLPHIN ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 6,800 0.62 0 MOSS ROAD DOI.PHIN ROAD S.R.434 COLLl!CTOR 10,900 7.300 0,67 0 Sllno 1 Pl'T'l!n t: No. 2 P.:lge 6 Fcbru:HY 200 I . TABLE 14 (Revised) (200) YEAR 2010 ROADWAY LINK LEVELS OF SERVICE WITH 2010 NETWORK (Computer Model) ROADWA Y rROM TO NO. OF ROADWAY LOS D MODEL V/C. MODEL LANES CLASS DAILY DAI~Y RATIO DAILY . CAPACITY V.OLUM E LOS MOSS ROAD S,R, 434 FIRST STREET 4 COLLECTOR 22,600 14,100 .62 0 MOSS ROAD" FIRST STREET S.R,419 3 COLLECTOR 12,000 :7,200 0,60 0 NORTHr:.RN WA V TROTWOOO BLVD TUSCORA DR. 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 6,100 0,56 0 NORTHr:.RN WA V TUSCORA DR, VIST A VILLA DR, 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 3,200 0,29 C NORTHr:.llN WA Y VISTA VILI.A DIt, WINTER SPG nl.VI) or:. 2 COI.I.GCTOR 10,900 3,600 0,33 C NORTIIr:.RN WA V . TROTWOOD BLVD WINTERSPG BLVD.S 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 2..500 0.23 C NORTHERN WA V WINTER SPG BLVD SHETLAND AVE, 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 3,600 0.33 C NORTHERN WAY SHETLAND AVE. GREENBRIAR LN, 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 3,900 0,36 C NORTHERN WAY GREENBRIAR LN. WINTER SPRG BLVD 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 2,200 0,20 C TROTWOOO OLVD TUSKA WILLA RD, NORTHERN WA V 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 4.500 0.42 C WINTeR SPG BLVD TUSKA WILLA RD, NORTHERN W A V 2 COLLECTOR 11,500 8,500 0,74 0 WINTER SPG OLVD NORTHERNWAV GREENORIAR LN, 2 COLLECTOR 11,500 5,600 0.49 0 WINTER SPG OLVD GREENORIAR LN. NORTHERN WAY 2 COLLECTOR 11,500 5,000 0.43 C WINTER SPG nLVD NORTHERN WAY NORTHERNWAV 2 COLLECTOR 12,000 11,100 0,93 0 WINTER SPG 8L" NORTHERN WAY S,R, 426 2 COLLECTOR I 2,000 11,900 0,99 0 PANAMA ROAD EDGEMON AVE, - MOSS ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 9,100 0.83 0 PANAMA ROAD MOSS ROAD SHORE ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,900. 1,300 0,12 C " HAVES ROAD BAHAMA ROAD DOLPHIN ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10.900 2,000 0,18 C HA YES ROAD DOLPHIN ROAD S.R.434 2 COLLECTOR 10,906 6,600 0.61 D DOLPHIN ROAD' MOSS ROAD H~ YES ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 2,700 0.25 C "'__ 0 ~ February 2001 (3 of 3) TABLE 14 (Revised) YEAR 2010 ROADWAY LINK LEVELS OF SERVICE " WITH 2010 NETWORK (Computer Model) , . , ROI.\DWA Y rROM TO No,or ROADWAY LOS,D MODEL VIC MODR UNES CUSS DAILY DAILY MTIO DAILY ~ CAPACITY VOLUME LOS FISHER ROAD EAST UKE DRIVE PANAMA ROAD .~: 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 ',400 0,13 C TUSCORA [)RIVE NORTHERN WA Y S.R.434 2 CO LLEC1'OR 10,900, 2,700 0.25 C VISTAWII.LA DR, NORTHERN WA Y S,R,434 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 4,000 0,37 C GRr:r:N8HIAR LN, NORTHERN WA Y WINTERSPRG BLVD, 2 COLLECTOR 1 Q,900 1,500 0.14 C DYSON DRIVE TUSKA WILLA RD. SHETLAND A VENUE 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 2,600 0.24 C SI1ETLAND AVE, RED I3UGLAKE DYSON DRIVE 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 3,500 0.32 C RD,' SHETLAND AVE, DYSON DRIVE NORTHERN WAY 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 5,000 0,46 C EDGEMON AVE. SEMINOLA BLVD. PANAMA ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 9,100 0.83 D EDGEMON AVE, SHEPARD ROAD S.R.419 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 4,300 0.39 C EDGr:MON AVE. S,R,434 SHEPARD ROAD, 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 5,600 0.51 D .- . A PORTION or TI.IIS SECTION OF ROAD IS 6 LANES. -.. ALTHOUGH THE 2010 TEST NETWORK HAD 4 LANES, THESE ITEMS HAVE BEEN REVISED FOR TURN UNES AND NOT WIDENING. J:\WU4S'J,04\LOS TA(Jl.li 14,WPD Supp lment No. 2 Page S J:\W0459.04\LOS T AOLE 14A,WPD February 200 I TABLE 14 A (I of 3) YEAR 2000 ROADWAY LINK LEVELS OF SERVICE WITH EXISTING NETWORK '. . ROADWA Y mOM TO NO.or ROADWAY LOSD 2000 V/C RATIO DAILY 1995119l)6 ,LANES CLASS DAILY DAILY " LOS DAILY CAPACITY ' VOLUME VOLUME U.S: 17-92 S,R: 434 SHEPARD.ItD, 6 ARTERIAL 52,500 36,959 0,70 0 36.123 U,S. 17.92 SHEf'ARD RO~ S.R.419 4 ARTERIAL 35,000 36,959 1.06 F 36,123 .. : S,R.434 U.S, 17-92 S,R,419 ARTCRlAl 35,000 24,983 0.71 C 24,an S.R. 434 S.R.419 TUSKAWILLA RD 4 ARTERIAL 35,000 32,609 0.93 C 24.757 S,R.434 TUSK A WILLA RD SPRING A VENUll ARTERIAL 35,000 1S.720 0.53 D 16,552 S.R. 434 SPRING A VllN.Ull GREllNllWAY 4 ARTllRIAL. 35,000 19,394 0,55 D \5.286 S.R.419 U,S, 17-92 EDGEMON AVE. ARTERIAL 16,600 21,090 1.27 F 15.553 S.R,419 EDGEMON ^ VE. S.R. 434 2 ARTERIAL 16,600 18,417 1.11 F 12.271 r. LAKll DRIVll SI!MINOLA OLVD rlSHER ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 14,600 12.044 0.82 0 \2.617 r~ LAKll DRIVE FISHER ROAD TUSKAWILLA RD, COLLECTOR 14,600 11.277 0.77 0 9,472 TUSKAWILLA RD, RED OUG LK RD EAGLE BLVD. ARTERIAL 35,000 27,583 0.79 0 2S..198 TUSKA WILLA RD, llAGLE BLVD. E, LAKE DRIVE 4 ARTERIAL 35,000 27,844 0,80 0 24,57) TUSKAWILLA RD. E. LAKE DRIVE WINTER SPGS, BLVD ARTERIAL 35,000 28,070 0.80 0 22.867 TUSKAWILLA RD. WINTER SPGS BI,VD TROTWOOD BLVD ARTERIAL 35,000 UIC (14,226) 0.41 C '16,071 TUSKAWILLA RD. TROTWOOD OLVD. S,R.434 ARTERIAL 35,000 Ule (13,822) 0.39 C 12,058 TUSKAWILLA RD. S.R,4)4 NORTH COLLECTOR 10,900 4,419 0.41 C 917 SIIEPARD RD. U.S. 17.92 SHEOAH DLVD, 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 5,226 0.4~ C 3,08\ SHEOAII [lLVD. SHEPARD RD, S,R.434 COLLllCTOR 10,900 2,676 0,25 C 5.88 \ MOSS ROAD PANAMA ROAD S,R, 434 COLLECTOR 10,900 3,932 0.)6 C 4.707 MOSS ROAD. S,R,4)4 C,R,419 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 2,594 0.24 C 2,4) 1 February 200 I ryc.1 February 2001 TABLE 14 A (2 0 f 3) ):'EAR 2000 ROADWAY LINK LEVELS OF SERVICE WITH EXISTING NETWORK " ROADWA Y FROM TO NO, OF ROADWAY LOS D 2000 VIC DAILY 1995/1996 LANES CLASS DAILY DAILY "RATIO LOS DAILY CAPACITY VOLUME VOLUME NORTHERN WAY WINTER spa BLVD TROTWOOD BLVD, 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 2,761 0.25 C 1,868 .NORTHERN WA Y TROTWOO'p BLVD VISTA WILLA DR, 2 . COLLECTOR 10,900 2,942 0.27 C 2,501 " ~:: . NORTHERN WAY WINTER spa BLVD SHETLAND AVE, 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 3,012 0.28 C 2,736 NORTHERN WA Y aREENORIAR LN, WINTER SPRGBLVD. 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 2,71:1 0.25 C 1,991 TROTWOOD nl.VD TUSKA WILLA RD, NORTHERN WA Y 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 4,190 0,38 C 4,121 TROTWOOD 13LVD, TUSKA WILLA RD. WEST 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 '1,647 0.15 C 2,046 WINTER spa 13LVD TUSKA WILLA RD. NORTHERN WAY 2 COLLECTOR 11,500 7,647 0.66 D 7.384 WINTER SPG BLVD NORTHER~WAY GREENBRIAR LN. 2 COLLECTOR 11.500 5,280 0.46 D 6,099 WINTER spa OLVD NORTHERN WAY NORTHERN WAY 2 COLLECTOR 11,500 7,647 0.66 D 7,484 WINTER spa OL NORTHERN WA Y S.R, 426 2 COLLECTOR '12.000 . . 11,152 0.93 D 12,260 SHORE ROAD PANAMA ROAD S.R. 434. 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 436 0.04 C 475 HA YES ROAD PANAMA ROAD S.R.434 2 COLLECTOR 10.900 5,671 0.52 D 3.381 DOLPHIN ROAD SHORES ROAD HA YEs ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 2,455 0.23 C 241 FISHER ROAD EAST LAKE DRIVE PANAMA ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 944 ' 0.09 C 1,267 TUSCORA DRlvr; NORTHERN WAY S.R.434 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 2,242 0.21 C 765 VISTA WILLA Dlt NORTHERN WAY SENECA BLVD, 2 COLLECTOR . 10,900 . 3,840 0.35 C 1,410 ft1.tJe. 10 TABLE 14 A YEAR 2000 ROADWAY LINK LEVELS OF SERVICE WITH EXISTING NETWORK February 200 I (3 of 3) ROADWA Y FROM TO "NO, OF " ROADWAY LOS D 2000 VIC DAILY 1995/1996 LANES CLASS DAILY DAILY RATIO LOS DAILY CAPACITY VOLUME" VOLUME GREENORIAR LN, NORTHERN WAY WINTER SPRG BLVD. 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 1,569 .' .,' 0.14 C 1,141 DYSON DRIVE TUSKA WILLA RD, SHETLAND A VENUE 2 " COLLECTOR 10,900 1,221 0.11 C 3.262 SmrrL.AND A VI:, CITRUS DYSON DRIVE 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 5,575 0.51 C 4,474 EDGEMON AYE. SEMINOLA OLVD, PANAMA ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 3,250 0.30 C 2,774 EDGEMON AVE. PANAMA ROAD S.R. 434 2 COLLECTOR" 10,900 2,930 0.27 C 3.783 EDGEMON AVE, S.R.434 S,R.419 2 COLLECTOR 10.900 3,281 0.30 C 2,480 WADE STREET S,R.434 S.R.419 2 COLL~TOR 10,900 623 0.06 C 1,034 ALTON ROAD riA YES ROAD SHORE ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10.900 1,246 0.11 C . 1,380 SENECA BLVD, . WINTER SPG BLVD r;,WAY 2 COLLECTOR '10,900 . 2,115 0.19 C 1,418 _0.- _ _"_ . _+_ , "VISTAWILLA COLLECTOR' 10,900 1.642 SENECA BLVD. r;,WAY 2 0.15 C 1.054 , U/C.. UNDER CONSTRUCTION" USED 1999 DATA 2000:DAIL Y VOLUME ARE DASED ON COUNTY TRAFFIC COUNTS FOR THE LAST QUARTER OF 2000 AND CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS" IN FEB. 2001. - - . r J:\W04S9.04\LOS T Anl.E 14A,WPD P41 e " { rng ,V~ ~. ~ ., N .. . e ~p~~ ~., ..~"'CCl ~~8" z:S :~~i ric. ~2~~.~ :c ~~~"l ~ 0 Nil.. _ g~.. 3 -"z (')Cl) . (I) LEGEND: . @ .EDS LOS D) DEfiCIENT (EXCE F'SERVlCE (A-F) CURRENT LEVEL 0 ~ ~ ~ ;;", ~o :08 en ~ . .~~ Zz t\)r6o. . o~o 9 m C J] -oZo Oen- ......-om ~ot5 ~rn g~ Zo ~5 oen -< RED BUG LAKE RD. r-.. v ~ u WAY CD ~ -N- ~ N,T,S. I- ! COJ~ ..... :;, ~ ~~ rT ~:;, ;c::;n ., /'V .... ~i=lg~ ~ ~ 'Ob~"'OQ) ~~P:DZ::l ~"";:J~ I'l1 c. !.!~.., I'l1 e~~~:o:t Ol~ ~~sn ~ l>>M 2~z3 ' (')~ .(ll f 5 0 Vl S.R. )> C) CD ~ > ,... z r:' f? 0 N Z ~ ~ ..... Vl 0 en ... ...... (Jl g lD (, ... :E ~~ :o~ cnz "Urn ;Qm rv :ozCJ ,~@~ OJ r!. m~~ vi CJ "U oz:o :S ~cnO _"Uril cnOs: _:0 g~m :j~ ocn ZiJ cn~ ~ ~'z CJ ~ -< ~' J) CXlC) ,C :0 m , LAKE DR. ::I ,0 ~ <3 ~ 'l' <(, ,W R,ED BUG 'LAKE RD. LEGEND: '~',',',',',',',', '. SIX LANES FOUR LANES THREE LANES TWO LANES PAVING/DRAINAGE EXTENSION TRAFFIC SIGNAL/ INTERSECTION GEOMETRY o '. EASTERN TOWN CENTER COLLECTOR l' z ~~ ~<( >- <( ~ ...J W""'" coj z2 a::: '-" w I- (J'l <( w o o o o ~ -N- ~ N:T,S, T~ble 15 2010 ROAD NEEDS DEVELOPER AND OTHER FUNDING (Inside City Limits) (Revised 2/2001) Local Developer 1. Improve Tuskawilla Road north of SR 434 (formerly Brantley Avenue). (Switch to Impact Fee Funding) / 2. Improve Spring Avenue (existing dirt road) with drainage and paving improvements. County* 1. Improve Shepard Road to three (3) lanes from U.S. 17-92 to, Sheoah Boulevard. (County portion) Note: This project is not funded or planned by the County. . 2. Improve East Lake Drive from two (2) lanes to four (4) lanes. (Under design)* State* 1. Improve U.S. 17-92 from Seminola Boulevard to SR 419 from four (4) lanes to six (6) lanes. (Construction for six [6] lanes completed to Shepard.) Six (6) lanes are planned in the 2020 Long Range Tra.nsportation Plan: .2. Improve SR 434 from U.S. 17-92 to Moss Road from five (5) lanes to seven (7) lanes. Note: This project IS not funded or planned by the Sfate. It was in the previous OUA TS 2010 Plan Update. It is not in the current 2020 Long Range Transportation Plan Update. 3. Improve SR 434 from SR 419 to Eastern B~ltway from four.(4) lanes to six (6) lanes. Note: this project is not funded or planned by State. It was in -the previous OUA TS 2010 Plan Update. It is not in the current 2020 Long Range TransPQrtation Plan Updat,e. . 4. Improve SR 419 from SR 434 to U.S. 17-92 from two (2) lanes to four (4) lanes. Note: This project is not funded or planned by the State. NOTE: Projects 2 and. 3 may not be .necessary and should be watched closely to determine if capacities exceed expected projections. . It appears that ."the City, should start. lobbying for. improvements to SR 419 as current counts exceed the existing roadway capacity. *See also Table 15A. Supplement No.2 Page 1V Table 15A STATE and COUNTY ROAD PROJECTS ADJACENT TO WINTER SPRIN:GS. State - TIP FY 2000/2001 - FY 2004-2005 1. SR 434 from US 17-92 to SR 419 - Improve'the traffic control devices/system. 2. SR 419 - Add right turn lanes at Edgemon Avenue and Moss Road. 3. SR 434 from East Street to SR 419 - Resurface. State - 2020 .[ong Range Transportation P.lan Update 1. SR 426 from the Seminole/Orange County Line to the Greeneway - Widen to 6 lanes. 2. US 17-92 from Shepard Road to Airport Boulevard - Widen to 6 lanes. County - TIP FY 2000/2001 - FY 2004/2005 1. Lake Drive from Seminola Boulevard to Tuskawilla"Road - Reconstruct to 4 lanes. 2. Red Bug Lake Road form SR 436 to Eagle Circle - Widen to 6 lanes. County - 2020 Long Range.Transportation Plan Update 1. Seminola Boulevard from US 17-92 to Lake Drive - Widen to 6 lanes. Supplement NO.2 Page 1$ TZlblc 16 . 2010 ROAD NEEDS CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS FUNDING (Revised 02/01) Phase I All Phase I recommendations have been completed. Phase II 1. , Paving and drainage improvements to Bahama Road from Shore Road to Hayes Road. (Completed) . ~I 2. Paving and drainage improvements to Panama Road.from Shore Road to Moss Road. , (Completed) 3, Paving,and drainage improvements to' Fisher Road from Panama Road to City Limits. (Un'der Design) 4. Add stacking lanes to Hayes Road at the SR 434 intersection. (Completed) Phase III 1.. Upgrade Moss Road from SR 434 to First Street from two lanes to four lanes and from First. Street to SR 419 from two lanes t6 two lanes divided and turn lanes.' (Under Design) 2. Improve Tuskawilla Road north of SR 434 (formerlySrantley Avenue). (Switch project from developer funded to impact fee.) 3. Construct Town Center collector road t.o accommodate new development. Roads will connect SR 434 and Tuskawilfa Road for collection of traffic from this area. Phase IV 1. Improve Winter Springs Boulevard-to three lane capa!;>i1ity from Northern Way to Northern Way (east section). This will be accomplished by adding. turn lanes at each intersection for both traffic flow directions. . . ;;...... Supplement No, 2 Page 16 ATTACHMENT 3 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA . 1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32700-2799 Telephone (407) 327-1000 Community Development Depl. Planning Division ,LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY REGULAR AGENDA ITEM: II. : H. CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO mE TRAFFIC CmCULATION ELEMENT SUBSTITUTING CITY'S TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR ALL TEXT AND MAPS IN VOLUME I AND ll. (LS-CP A-6-00) STAFF REPORT: APPLICABLE LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY: The provisions of 163.3174(4) Florida Statutes which state "Be the agency (Local Planning Agency) responsible for the preparation of the comprehensive plan or plan amendment and shall make recommendations to the governing body regarding the adoption or amendment of such plan. During the preparation of the plan or plan amendment and prior to any recommendation to the governing body, the Local Planning Agency shall hold at least one public hearing, with public notice, on the proposed plan or plan amendment." The provisions of Sec. 20-57 of the City Code which state in part ". .the planning and zoning board shall serve as the local planning agency pursuant to the county comprehensive planning act and the local government comprehensive planning act of the " . state. . . It is City Administration policy that the applicant must provide the data, inventory and analysis in support of the proposed comprehensive plan amendment and provide the response to the ORC Report. APPLICAN)': City of Winter Springs 1126 East S,R. 434 Winter Springs, FL 32708 (407) 327-1800 LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY March 7. 200 I Traffic Circulation Element Update Plan Amendment LS-CPA-6-00 Page I of3 REQUEST: PURPOSE: For the Local Planning Agency to review and recommend the requested changes to the City's Comprehensive Plan Tramc Circulation Element Data, Inventory & Analysis section and Goals, Objectives and Policies section. The City needs to update the Traffic Circulation Element based on the results of the recently completed City of Winter Springs Transportation Study prepared by Conklin, Porter & Holmes. The contents of the Study are intended to replace completely the current text and maps in the Traffic Circulation Element Volume 1 of 2 and Volume 2 of2. OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT (ORC) FROM THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS: The City's consultant for this proposed plan amendment is CPH Engineering, Inc. CPH Engineering, Inc. received a copy of the ORC Report and has made the responses. [ See Attachment 2 ] FINDINGS: . CPH Engineering, Inc. has provided the necessary response (as Supplement #2 "Update to City of Winter Springs Transportation Study'''') to the ORC Report relating to the proposed plan amendment LS-CP A-6-00. . A number of changes have occurred since the preparation and adoption (on April 27, 1992) of the City's Comprehensive Plan, prompting the need for an update of the Traffic Circulation Element. . The City initiated comprehensive plan amendment updates the Traffic Circulation Element Data, Inventory & Analysis (Volume 1 of2) and the Goals, Objectives and Policies (Volume 2 of 2). . The prop'osed plan amendment is compatible with and not in conflict with the other elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan, . The comprehensive plan amendment is compatible with and furthers the goals, objectives and policies of the State Comprehensive Plan. . The comprehensive plan amendment is compatible with and furthers the goals, LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY March 7. 2001 Traffic Circulation Element Update Plan Amendment LS-CPA-6-00 Pagc 2 of3 Thc comprchcllsive plall alllclldmcllt is compatible with alld furthers the goals, objectives and policies of the East Central Florida Comprehensive Regional Policy Plan, STAFF RECOMMENDA TION: Staff recommends that the Local Planning Agency make the following recommendation to the City Commission: That the City Commission hold a second (adoption) public hearing and adopt the large scale comprehensive plan amendment (LS-CP A-6-00) incorporating CPH Engineering, Inc.' s response to the ORC Report into the amendment, that would update the Traffic Circulation Element in Volume 1 of 2 and Volume 2 of 2 of the City's Comprehensive Plan. A TIACHMENTS: 1. ORC Report for Proposed Plan Amendment (LS-CPA-6-00). 2. Response to the ORC Report for LS-CP A-6-00. 3. City of Winter Springs Transportation Study - August, 1997. LOCALP~GAGENCY March 7. 200 I Traffic Circulation Elcmcnt Updatc Plan Amcndmcnt LS-CPA-6-00 P"ttC ) or 3 ATTACHMENT 1 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS OBJECTIONS', RECOMMENDATIONS AND ~O:M:MENTS FOR THE ,CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS . AMENDl\1ENTOl-l January 26.2001 Division of Community Planning Bureau of Local Planning This report is prepared pursuant to Rule 9J-11.01O INTRODUCTION . The following objections, recommendations and cominents are based upon the Department's review of the City ofWmter Springs 01-1 proposed amendment to their comprehensive plan pursuant to s. 163.3184, Florida Statutes (F.S.). . Objections relate to specific requirements of relevant portions of Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative' Code (F.A.C.), and Chapter 163, Part IT, F.S. Each.objection includes a recommendation of one approach that might be taken to address the cited objection. Other approaches may be more suitable in specific situations. Some of these objecti"ons may have initially been raised 'by one of the other external review agencies. Ifthere is a difference between the Department's objection and the external agency advisory objection or comment, the Department's objection would take precedenCe; Each of these objections must be addressed by the local government and corrected when the" amendment is resubmitted for our compliance review. Objections which are not addressed may result in "a determination that the amendment is not in compliance~ The Department may have raised an. objection regarding missing data and analysis items which the local government considers not . . appli~ble to its amendment. !fthat is the case, a statement justifying its non-applicability pursuant to Rule 9J-5.002(2), F.A.C., must be submitted. The Department will make a determination on the non-applicability of the requ.irement, and if the justification is sufficient, the objection will be considered addressed. . . The comments which follow the objections and recommendations section are' advisory in nature. " Comments will not form bases of a determination of non-compliance. They are included to call attention to items raised by our reviewers. The comments can "be substantive, concerning planning . ... principles, methodology or logic, as well as editorial in nature dealing With grammar, organization, ~apping" and reader comprehension. Appended to the back of the Department's report are the commen~ letters from the other sta~ereview agencies and other agencies, organizations and individuals. Thes~ comments are advisory to .the Department and may not form bases of Departmental objections unless they appear under the "Objections" neading in this report. b. Intern:)l Consistency: Because the amendment has not demonstrnled consistency with statutory requirements for protection of natural resources, and for coordination ofland uses with transportation facilities and services, amendment has not demonstrated internal consistency with the City's goals, objectives and policies of the comprehensive plan as listed: Traffic Circulation: Objective B, Policy 1 and 6, requiring coordination, Objective C, and Policies 1 through 7 requiring level of service maintenance, Objective D, Policies 2 and 3; Future Land Use Element: Goal 2, Objective A, Policies 1 through 3, requiring protection of natural resources; and Goal 4 Objective B, Policies 1, 3, and 5, regarding open space and wetland preservation in Town Center Areas; Conservation: Goal 1, Objective B, P,olicies 1,2,4, and 5, protecting natural resources, Objective c, Policies 6 and 7, regarding protection of floodplains and coordination; Capital Improvements: goal 1, Objective C, Policy 1, Transportation LOS , ' Recommendation: Make applicable revisions as rec~mmended in Part LA.l.b. Sections: "163.3177(1), 163.3177(6)(a), 163,3177(6)(c), 163.3177(6)(d), 163.3177(6)0),163.3177(8),163.3187(2), F.S. Rules: 9J-~.Q05(2), 9J-5.005(5), 9J-5.006(2)(b) and (c); 9J:.5.006(3)(b)3, (b)6, (b)10 and (c)2; 9J-5.006(4); 91-5.006(5), 91-5.013(2), F.A.C. B. Traffic Circulation Element 1. LS-CPA-6-00: The City has not met the requirements of the Transportation because certain tables are not consistent with the FDOT work program and the revised element does not include a current LOS for all roadways in the City." Recommendation: Revise Tables 14, 15, and Figures 7,8 for SR. 434, CR 419, SR 419, and Us 17-92 to be consistent with the FDOT work program. Reflect applicable roadway improvements as scheduled in the"FDOT work program as was reconunended in the original 98-1 ORC. Furthermore, the City has not revised the listing of facilities ill the program to be consistent with Seniinole County. The City should revise the element to demonstrate coordination of facilities " , with the County by including a sc~edule "of improvements. Other requirements should be met under chapter 163.3177(6)0), F.S., and 91-5.019(4) and (5), Flo"rida Administrative Code. The Element should include the current Level of Service for roadways in the City. Given that the data is from 1996 and 1997" the City should revisit the issue to detetmine if this is still the best available data. The map series should include current level of service fOHoadways. The plan includes projected level of service but the table should be reviewed to see if the information is still applicable. Sections: 163.3 I 77 (6) (b ), 163.3177(6)0),163,3177(8), F.S. "Rules: 91-5.006(4), 9J-5.019(4), 9J-5.019(5), F.A.C. 5 II. STATE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSISTENCY A. OBJECfION 1. The proposed amendments are not consistent. with the following goals and policies of the State Comprehensive Plan: . c. d. e. f. g. Goal (8) Water Resources, and Policies (b)2, (b)4, (b)8, and (b) 1 0; Goal (10) Natural Systems, and Recreational Lands and Policies (b)1, (b)3, (b)6, and (b)7; . Goal (12), Energy, and Policy (b)3; ..;-ooal (16); Land'Use, aild Policies (b)1, (b)2, (b)3, and (b)6; 'Goal (18), Public FacilitieS, and. Policies (b)1, and (b)6; , Goal (20), Transportation, and Policies (b)2, (b)3, (b) 13 , and (b)15; and .Goal'(26), Plan Implementation and Policy (b)7. .' a b. B. RECOMMENDATION The City should revise the proposed amendment, as necessary, to be consistent with the above-referenced goals and policies of the State Comprehensive Plan. Specific recommendations c~ be found following the objections cited elsewhere in this ORC'report. 6 '':.' .' ATTACHMENT 2 We have prepared a response to the DCA comments on the Traffic Circulation. B. Traffic Circulation Element 1. LS-CPA-6-00: The City has not met the requirements of the Transportation because certain tables are not consistent with the FOOT work program and the revised element does not include a current LOS for all roadways in the City. Recommendation: Revise Tables 14,15, and Figures 7,8 for SR 434, CR 419, SR419, and US 17-92 to be consistent with the FOOT work program. Reflect applicable roadway improvements as scheduled in the' FOOT work program as was recommended in the original 98-1 ORC. Furthermore, the City has not revised the listing':of facilities in the program to be consistent with Seminole Couhty. The City should revise the element to demonstrate co?rdination of facilities with the County by including a schedLile of 'improvements. .. Other requirements should be met under Chapter 163.3177(6)0), F.S., and 9J-5.019(4) and (5), Florida Administrative Code. The E'lerrient should include the current Level of Service for roadways in the City: Given that the data is from 1996 and 1997, the City should revisit the issue to determine if this is still the best available data. The map series should include current level of service for roadways. The plan includes projected level of service but the table should be reviewed to see if the information is still applicable. Sections: 163.3177(6)(b), 163.3177(6)0), 163.3177(8), F.~. Rules: 9J-5.006(4), 9J-5.019(4), 9J-5.019(5), F.A.C. Response: We have revised Tables 14" 15 and Figure 8. We do not believe that Figure 7 needs to be revised. Figure 7, represents the test network used, not the recommended plan. It was used as the base to determine the required improvements as identified by the model. In reality, the only difference between the Figure 7 shown and the existing roadways (as they exist today) is the test network had SR 434 as a six (6)-lane road between US 17-92 and Moss Road, and Seminola as a six (6)-lane road by 2020. 'Improvement$ to SR 434 from US .17 -92 to MQss Road have been removeq from the current 2020 Long Range.Transportation Plan by the MPO - Metro Plan Orlando. ,We have adjusted our planningdoculT.l~!1tation accordingly to reflect this information. We have prepared Supplement NO.2 which updates the'Transp'ortation ,Element and includes revisions and additions as requested. It also includes 2000 counts from the County and February 2001 Counts from the City. We have also included Table 14A, which shows the 2000 Existing LOS Data for City Roadways (including state and county roads), and Figure 3A. which identifies LOS in a graphicS format. J:\W0459.04\WD\RESPONSE TO DCA COMMENTS. DOC . SUPPLEM~NT NO.2 Update To CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS TRANSPORTATION STUDY February 2001 CPH Engineers, Inc. 1117 E. Robinson Street Orlando, Florida 32801 (407) 425-0452 CPH Project No. W0459.04 The Transportation Study was completed in 1997 and identified no deficiencies in the transportation infrastructure of the City of Winter Springs' local system for the projected 2010 traffic loadings. Roadways identified for improvements included U.S. 17-92, S.R. 434, Seminola Boulevard, Lake Drive, and Tuskawilla Road which are under the control of the County and FOOT. The U.S. 17-92 six-lane improvement project from Shepard Road (Winter Springs) south to Melody Lane (Casselberry) has been completed. State Road 434 has been improved to four lanes from S.R. 419 to the Greeneway. Seminola Boulevard has been improved to four lanes; Tuskawilla Road has : been improved to four lanes divided from Lake Drive to Red B,ug and is under construction from Lake Drive north to SR 434; and Lake Drive is curre':ltly under design for four lanes divided. This Supplement No. 2 updates the 1997 study and Supplement No. 1 to acknowledge these . . improvements and the ones also constructed by the City. No changes were made to the land use, eXisting uses, or projected development. We are presenting current data to allow for a comparison of where we were in 1996 and where we are today; We can also use this data to evaluate the accuracy of our projection,s. We have also updated roadway capacities based on the FOOT 1998 Level of Service Handbook. It has become evident that a collector road system is required for the undeveloped area east of the City Hall. This area has been designated as the Town Center and is scheduled for growth within the planning period. A roadway collector system has been identified to serve this area. Since these roads are for new growth, the funding is projected to come from the transportation impact fee. This collector system is shown on the attached revised drawings. Only updated materials are attached to this supplement. Since the growth projections have not been revised, the overall traffic study remains valid.. \ Supplement No, 2 Page 1 Supplement No.2 REVISED/UPDATED TABLES ahd FIGURES Page 2 Table 4A 1996/2001 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC COUNT RESULTS . RAW : AVERAGE ADJUSTED , " ROADWAY FROM TO TRAFFIC COUNT ANNUAL ANNUAL COUNTS DATE FDOT ADJ. TRAFFIC TWO-WAY 1996 FACTOR TWO-WAY SHEPARD RD. U.S. 17-92 SH)::OAH BL YD. 5279 2/13 0.99 5226 SHEOAH BLVD. SHEPARD RD. S.R. 434 2703 2/13 0.99 2676 MOSS ROAD S,R. 434 C.R.419 2620 2/13 0.99 2594 MOSS ROAD PANAMA S.R. 434 3972 2/13 0.99 3932 EDGEMON AVE. SEMINOLA PANAMA 3316 2/14 0.98 3250 EDGEMON AVE. PANAMA S.R. 434 2990 2/14 0.98 2930 EDGEMON AVE. S,R, 434 C.R.419 3314 2/13 0.99 3281 WADE STREET S.R. 434 C,R.419 623 2/13 0.98 617 DOLPHIN ROAD I-I A YES ROAD SHORE ROAD 2505 2/14 0.98 2455 I-TA YES ROAD . PANAMA' S.R. 434 5787 2/14 0.98 5671 SHORE ROAD PANAMA S.R. 434 436 2/14 0.98 427 TROTWOOD BLVD TUSCA WILLA NORTHERN WAY 4275 2/15 0.98 4190 TROTWOOD BLVD W. OF TUSKA WILLA 1681 2/15 0.98 1647 NORTHERN WAY WINTER SPGS BLVD TROTWOOD BLVD 2817 2/15 0.98 2761 NORTHERN WAY TROTWOOD BLVD. VISTA WILLA 3002 2/15 0.98 2942 NORTHERN WAY WINTER SPGS BLVD ,SHETLAND 3073 2/15 0.98 3012 NORTHERN WAY GREENBRIAR WINTER SPGS BLVD 2768 2/15 0.98 2713 VISTA WILLA NORTHE-RN WA Y ,SENECA 3918 2/20 0.98 3840 WINTER SPGS BLVD TUSCA WILLA NORTHERN WAY 7803 2/19 0.98 7647 WINTER SPGS BLVD NORTHERN WAY GREENBRIAR 5388 2!1'9 0.98 5280 WINTER SPG'S BLVD NORTHERN WA Y NORTHERN WAY 7803 2/19 0.98 7647 WINTER SPGS BLVD NORTHERN WAY CITY LIMITS 11380 2/19 0.98 11,152 GREENBRIAR WINTER SPGS B,L VD NORTHERN WAY .. 160 1 ' 2/19 0.98 1569 DYSON DRIVE TUSCA WILLA SHETLAND 1246 2/20 0.98 1221 SHETLAND CITRUS ROAD DYSON DRIVE . 5689 2/20 0.98 5575 ALTON ROAD HA YES ROAD SHORE 1271 2/14 0.98 1246 BIRD RD/FISHER LAKE DRIVE NORTH 963 2/14 0.98 944 TUSKA WILLA S.R. 434 NORTH 4509 2/15 0.98 4419 TUSCORA NORTHERN WAY S.R. 434 2288 2/15 0.98 2242 SENECA WINTER SPGS BLVD Y1WAY 2158 2/19 0.98 21 IS SENECA 'h WAY VISTA WILLA 1675 2/19 0.98 1642 J:\W0459,04\WP\TABLE 4^:WPD TABLE 6 (Revised 2/2001) PROGRAMMED AND PLANNED HIGHWAY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS WINTER SPRINGS TRANSPORTATION STUDY AREA Roadway Segment Improvement Programmed1 Planned 2,4 SR 419 Edgemon to Moss Turn Lanes 2002 S:R. 434 US 17-92 to SR 419 Traffic Control 2002 Lake Drive Seminola Boulevard to Add 2 Lanes 2002-2005 Tuskawilla Road Moss Road S.R. 434 to S.R. 419 Add 2 Lanes 2000-2005 Red Bug Lak.~' SR 436 to Eagle Circle Widen to 6 2000-2005 Rd Lanes Seminola Blvd. US 17-92 to Lake Drive Widen to 6 2015 Lanes S.R. 434 U.S. 17-92 to S.R. 419 Add 2 Lanes 20102.3 (Removed in 4 below) (6 Total) S.R.:434 S.R. 419 to Eastern Add 2 Lanes 201043 . Beltway (6 Total) (Removed in 4 below) U.S. 17-92 Shepard Road to Airport. Add 2 Lanes 20102.4 Boulevard SR 426 County Line to Widen to 6 2015 Greenaway Lanes 1. Contained in construction program of FDOT or Seminole County. 2. Contained in OUATS 2010 Plan Update (Adopted Highway Needs Network). Not in current 2020 Long Range Transportation Plan Update. . 3. Latest date based on need. This applies to all "2010" numbers in this column. 4. 2020 Long Range Transportation Plan. Supplement No, 2 Page 4 Table 8 Lanes! Divided 2 U ndiv ided 4 Div ide<! 6 Div ide<! 8 Divided AU N!A N/A N/A N:A BOO N/A N/A N/A N1A level 01 Service e 9.900 22.900 35.500 44.700 .....IW" vC)anIJ.d ar... O"l''' ~OO.OCC and 1.'''"0 kJ 01 p..,lnO Wllh1n ~ mil.. 01 "'. D","."" (itw (HIlJaI but On... ditlllcll level 01 Serv Ico lanes A B e 0 E 4 21.200 34.300 51.500 66,200 81.700 6 32.600 52,700 79,000 101,600 125.400 8 44,500 71.800 107.800 138,600 171.100 10 55.600 89,800 134.700 173.200 213.800 12 65.200 105.400 158.100 203,200 250,900 Group 2 to-:tt.~n u~&nI'Ud .," ."d r.Of 'n Gt:No U lo'. el 01 Sorv Ic. E'" lanes A B C D E 16.600 4 20.900 32,800 49,200 62,600 74,500 35.000 6 32.100 50,400 75,600 96,200 114,500 52.500 8 43.800 68,800 103.200 131,300 156.300 64.400 10 54.700 86.000 129,000 164,200 195.400 12 64.100 100.800 151,200 192.400 229.100 \ NDN.STATE ROADWAYS LIA.ICfI OTY.cQ;HTY RC>oOWAYS E 16.200 level 01 Servic 34,300 Lanes AU B" C 51.700 2 Undiv ided N/A N/A 8,600 63.400 4 Divided N/A N/A 19,800 6 Div ided N/A N/A 30.800 INTERRUPTED flO/'f Class I t>O.OO 10 1.U I:;r.at;.ud wlfrucdOl'\l ~...mil.J Lanes! DivIded 2 UOOlv Ide<! 4 Divided 6 Divided 8 Divided A" N/A N/A N/A N/A B 10.800 23.500 . 35.800 45,300 level 01 Servk:e e 15.600 33.200 49.900 61.400 Class II Q.ooIO.a~ aJp.Ud ;.N.".do:~ ~"~'J Class III tno.. U\an 4.50 ,i'1"AJiI.d Inlt'fSK'QI"I;I pel mil, and nol w1lhln p'maly city unQl busl"", <t<uricl 01 ucarind at'UI CWtf $OO.COOl lanes! level 01 Serv ice lanes AU B" C Divided A" B" e D E 2 Undivided N/A N/A 4.800 2 Undivided N/A N/A 3,300 12.100 15.800 4 Divided N/A N/A 11.600 4 Divided N/A N/A 7.800 27,800 33.600 6Div ided N/'" N!A 12.100 43,300 50.500 8 Divided "/A N/A 15.300 54,200 62.100 ADJUSThIENTS O.vlOE o.-,;NOrVIOE 0 Class IV tno,. U".a."'\ ..50 ,;gna~iltd intltstc'OI"oS ~,,"i1. and.nlNn pAma,., city c.:atr~ tvsitl.ss c.stA(tol.;rt:..,il.d ..~a OVt' !,:x),GCOl tantf com.ponding twO-way yof\.lm. .indlcltt-d pe~.ml Len Turn Jldju.lmenl Bays Facto;s Yes +5"Y. Lane:sl Level or Service Divided A" B" e 0 E 2 Undivided N/A N/A 3,700 13,800 15.300 4 Divided N/A N/A 8.900 29,900 32.600 6 Divided N/A N/A .14,000 (5,500 ~9.000 8 Div ided N/:" N/A 17 .500 56,200 60.100 Lanes 2 2 Muhi Muni Median Oividad Undivided Undivid~ UnQlV ided No Ve. No .20",;, .50:-. .25% ONE-WAY c.!1" conesporu:s"g ~a1 volume illdicaud pee.,....) The Florida Department 01 Transportation Source: Sy siems PlaMing Off ice 605 Suwannee Slreet . Ma~ Slal;on 19 Tallahassee. FI",ida 32399-0450 One.Way Lanes hll p:llww...,dol,s lale_' I. us/plannng 2 3 4 5 Equivalcnl T_\V... 1_. 4 6 8 8 Jldiustmenl Factors .4~. . 40~~ .. 4~. -25% . The table does not conslilule a Slandard and should be used only lor seneral planning app6cations. The com puler models Irom which this .able is derived should be used lor more specil.ie planning applications, The lable and deriving compuler models should nol be used lor corridor or inlerse<:tion design. whe,e more relined te<:hniques exist, .Values shown are annual average daiJ./ volu",es (based on Kloo laclors, nol peak.to-daily ralios) lor levels 01 ser/iee. and are based on the 1997 Updale to Ihe Hishway CapacilY Manual and Florida traffic, roadway, and sisna6zalion data. The table's input value assumptions and level of service criteria 3j:lpe3ron the lono\\.';ng pase. .. Cannol be achieved. '" Volumes are compara~te be:ause intersection C3;>3dli.eS have been (eached. September 199-a Supp lE':fTent No. 2 Page ~ ~ ~ J:\\V0459,04\LOS T ADLE 14,WPD February 200 I TABLE 14 (Revised) (1 of 3) YEAR 2010 ROAOWAY LINK LEVELS OF SERVICE WITH 2010 NETWORK (Computer Model) ROADWA Y mOM TO'. NO, OF ROADWAY LOS D MODEL VIC RATIO MODEL LANES CLASS DAILY DAILY DAILY CAPACITY VOLU~iE LOS U.S, 17.92 S,R,434 SHEPARD RD, 6 ARTERIAL 52,500 52,200 1.00 D U,S, (7.92 SlfPARD RD. S.R,419 6 ARTERIAL 52,500 55,200 1.05 F S.R,434 U,S, 17.~~ MOSS RD, 6 ARTERIAl. 52,500 41,800 0,88 D S,R.4J4 MOSS RD, S.R,419 4 ARTERIAL 35,000 26,900 0.75 D S.R. 4J4 S,R, 41~ TUSKAWILI.A RD ARTERIAl. 35,000 39,000 1.1 F S.11. 4J4 TlISKAWII.I.A Rn SPRING A VJ;NUJ; ARTERIAl. 35,000 3~..OOO 1.\ [' S.R.434 SPRING A VENUE EASTERN BEL TW A Y 4 ARTERUAK 35,000 41,800 1.19 F S.R. 4\~ U,S, 17-92 EDGEMON AVE. ARTERIAl. 16,600 19,900 1.20 F S.R. 41~ EDGEMON AVE, S,R, 434 ARTERIAL 16,600 16,600 1.00 D E. LAKE DRIVE SEMINOLA OLVD FISHER ROAD COLLECTOR 31,700 21,500 0,95 D E, l.AKE DRIVE ['ISHER ROAD TUSKAWILLA RD, COLLECTOR 31,700 22,600 1.00 D TUSKAWILLA RD,. RED AUG LK RD EAGLE OLVD. 6 ARTERIAL 48,900 39,500 0,83 D TIJSKAWII.I.A RD, EA(jJ.E OLVD, E, LAKE DRIV!! ARTERIAL 35,000 35.500 1.0 D TUSKAWILLA RD, E, LAKE DRIVE WINTER SPGS, OLVD 4 ARTERIAL 35,000 25.200 0,71 D TUSKAWILLA RD. WINTER SPGS OLVD TROTWOOD OLVD 4 ARTERIAL 35,000 20,700 0.60 C TUSKAWII.I.A RD, TROTWOOD OLVD. S,R, 43~ 4 ARTERIAL 35,000 20,200 0,57 C SHEPARD RD, U,S, 17-92 SHEOAH BLVD, 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 11.200 1.03 E SHEPARD RD, SHEOAH OLVD, EDGEMON AVE, 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 7,900 o.n D SHEOAH OLVD, SHEPARD RD, S,R,434 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 8,400 0,77 D BAHAMA ROAD HA YES ROAD WINDrNG HOLLOW BL 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 100 0,01 C MOSS ROAD PANAMA ROAD DOLPHIN ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 6,800 0.62 D MOSS ROAD DOI.PHlN ROAD S.R. 434 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 7.300 0,67 0 Suoo 1 ment No. 2 . Page 6 Fcbru<lry 2001 TABLE 14 (Revised) (2 of 3) YEAR 2010 ROADWAY LINK LEVELS OF SERVICE WITH 2010 NETWORK (Computer Model) ROADWAY FROM TO NO,OF ROADWA Y LOS D MODEL V/C MODEL LANES CLASS DAILY DAILY RATIO DAILY . CAPACITY VOLUME LOS MOSS ROAD S,R, 434 FIRST STREET 4 COLLECTOR 22,600 14,100 ,62 D MOSS ROAD" FJRST STREET S,R,419 3 COLLECTOR 12,000 :7,200 0,60 D NORTHERN WA Y TROTWOOD BLVD TUSCORA DR, 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 6,100 0,56 D NORTHERN WAY TUSCORA DR, VISTAVILLA DR, 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 3,200 0.29 C NORTllEltN WAY VISTA VI LL^ DR, WINTER SPG nLvD .E 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 3,600 0,)3 C NORTHERN WAY . TROTWOOD BLVD WINTER SPG BLVD-S 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 2..500 0,23 C NORTHERN WA Y WINTER SPG BLVD SHETLAND AVE, 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 3,600 0,33 C NORTHERN WA Y SHETLAND AVE, GREENBRIAR LN, 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 3,900 0,36 C NORTHERN WAY GREENBRIAR LN, WINTER SPRG BLVD 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 2,200 0,20 C TROTWOOD BLVD TUSKA WILLA RD, NORTHERN WAY 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 4,500 0.42 C WINTER SPG BLVD TUSKA WILLA RD. NORTHERN WAY 2 COLLECTOR 11,500 8,500 0.74 D WINTER SPG BLVD NORTHERN WAY GREENBRIAR LN. 2 COLLECTOR 11,500 5,600 0.49 D WINTER SPG BLVD GREENBRIAR LN, NORTHERN WAY 2 COLLECTOR 11,500 5,000 0.43 C WINTER SPG BLVD NORTHERN WAY NORTHERN.w A Y 2 COLLECTOR 12,000 11,100 0,93 D WINTER S!'G I3L" NORTHERN WAY S,R.426 2 COLLECTOR 12,000 11,900 0.99 D PANAMA ROAD EDGEMON AVE. - MOSS ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 9,100 0.83 D PANAMA ROAD MOSS ROAD SHORE ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 1,300 0.12 C HA YES ROAD BAHAMA ROAD DOLPHIN ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 2,000 0,18 C HA YES ROAD DOLPHIN ROAD S.R.434 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 6,600 0,61 D DOLPHIN ROAD MOSS ROAD H~ YES ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 2,700 0.25 C ~'''''' 1 """"nt' No, ? Pa~ 'J February 2001 (3 0 f 3) TABLE 14 (Revised) YEAR 2010 ROADWAY LINK LEVELS OF SERVICE WITH 20 I 0 NETWORK (Computer Model) . ROi\DWAY FROM TO NO. OF ROADWA Y LOSD MODEL VIC MODEL l.^NES Cl.^SS DAILY DAILY RATIO DAILY CAPACITY VOLUME LOS FISHER ROAD EAST l.^KE DRIVE PANAMA ROAD .~; 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 1-;400 0,13 C TUSCORA DRIVE NORTHERN WAY S.R.434 2 COLLECTOR 10,900, 2,700 0.25 C VISTAWILLA DR, NORTHERN WAY S,R,434 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 4,000 0.37 C GREENBRIAR LN, NORTHERN WA Y WINTER SPRG 8L VD, 2 COLLECTOR 10.900 1.500 0,14 C DYSON DRIVE TUSKA WILI.A RD. SHETLAND A VENUE 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 2,600 0,24 C SHETLAND AVE, RED BUG LAKE DYSON DRIVE 2 COLLECTOR 10.900 3,500 0,32 C RD,' SHETLAND AVE, DYSON DRIVE NORTHERN WAY 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 5,000 0.46 C EDGEMON AVE, SEMINOLA BLVD, PANAMA ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10.900 9,100 0,83 D EDGEMON AVE, SHEPARD ROAD S,R,419 2 COLLECTOR 10.900 4,300 0.39 C EDGEMON AVE. S,R,434 SHEPARD ROAD, 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 5,600 0,51 D · A PORTION or TI.IIS SECTION OF ROAD IS 6 LANES, .. ALTHOUGH THE 2010 TEST NETWORK HAD 4 LANES, HIESE ITEMS HAVE BEEN REVISED FOR TURN LANES AND NOT WIDENING, J:\W045'J,04\LOS TAUI.!! 14,WPD Supplemmt No. 2 Page S J:\W0459.04\LOS TABLE 14A,WPD February 200 I TABLE 14 A (1 of 3) YEAR 2000 ROADWAY LINK LEVELS OF SERVICE WITH EXISTING NETWORK ROADWAY mOM TO NO.Or ROADWA Y LOS D 2000 V/C RATIO DAILY 1. 99 5/1 996 . LANES CLASS DAILY DAILY . . LOS DAILY CAPACITY VOLUME VOLUM E U.S: 17.92 S.R: 434 SHEPARQRD. 6 ARTERIAL 52,500 36,959 0,70 0 36,123 U,S, 17.92 SHE~ARD RD'I S,R.419 ARTERIAL 35,000 36,959 1.06 F 36,123 ,. S,R,434 U.S. 17-92 S,R,4\9 ARTERIAL 35,000 24,983 0,71 C 24,8?] S,R. 434 S,R.419 TUSKAWILLA RD ARTERIAL 35,000 32,609 0.93 C 24,757 S,R.434 TUSKAWILLA RO SPRING A VENUr! ARTERIAL 35.000 18,720 0.53 [) 16,552 S, R. 434 SPRING A Vr!NUE GREENEWAY ARTERIAL. 35,000 19,394 0.55 [) 15.286 S.R,419 U,S, 17.92 EDGEMON AVE, ARTERIAL 16,600 21,090 1.27 F 15,5S3 S,R,419 EDGEMON AVE, S.R. 434 2 ARTERIAL 16,600 18,417 1.\1 F 12.271 ~. LAKE DRIVE SEMINOLA OLVD fiSHER ROAD COLLECTOR 14,600 12,044 0,82 D 12.617 r~ LAKr! DRIVE FISHER ROAD TUSKA WILLA RD, COLLECTOR 14,600 11,277 0.77 0 9,472 TUSKAWILLA RD. RED AUG LK RD EAGLE [)LVD. ARTERIAL 35,000 27,583 0,79 D 25.398 TUSKAWILLA RD. EAGLE BLVD, E, LAKE DRIVE 4 ARTERIAL 35,000 27,844 0.80 D 24,573 TUSKAWILLA RO, E, LAKE DRIVE WINTER SPGS, BLVD ARTERIAL 35,000 28,070 0.80 D 22,867 TUSKAWILLA RD. WINTER SpGS BI.VD TROTWOOD BLVD ARTERIAL 35,000 UlC (14,226) 0.41 C I 6.0 71 TUSKAWILLA RO, TROTWOOD BLVD, S,R. 434 4 ARTERIAL 35,000 U/C (13,822) 0,39 C 12.058 TUSKAWILLA RD. S.R,434 NORTH COLLECTOR 10,900 4,419 0.41 C 917 SIl~PARD RO, U,S, 17-92 SHEOAH BLVD. COLLECTOR 10,900 5,226 0.48 C 3,081 SHEOAH nLVD, IiHEPARD RD. S, R, 434 COLLECTOR 10,900 2,676 0,25 C 5.881 MOSS ROAD PANAMA ROAD S, R, 434 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 3,932 0,36 C 4,707 MOSS ROAD S,R.434 C,R,419 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 2,594 0.24 C 2,431 February 200 J P...,~ 1 February 2001 TABLE 14 A (2 aD) YEAR 2000 ROADWAY LINK LEVELS OF SERVICE WITH EXISTING NETWORK ROADWA Y FROM TO NO,OF ROADWAY LOS D 2000 VIC DAILY 1995/1996 LANES CLASS DAILY DAILY "RATIO LOS DAILY CAPACITY VOLUME VOLUME NORTHERN WA Y WINTER SPG BLVD TROTWOOD BLVD, 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 2,761 0.25 C 1,868 NORTHERN WA Y TROTWoob BLVD VISTA WILLA DR, 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 2,942 0.27 C 2,501 " 'NORTHERN WAY WINTER SPG BLVD SHETLAND AVE, 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 3,012 0,28 C 2,736 NORTHERN WAY GREENBRIAR LN, WINTER SPRG,BLVD. 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 2,713 0.25 C 1,991 TROTWOOD nLvD TUSKA WILLA RD, NORTHERNW A Y 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 4,190 0,38 C 4,121 TROTWOOD BLVD, TUSKAWILLA RD. WEST 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 1,647 0.15 C 2,046 WINTER SPG BLVD TUSKA WILLA RD. NORTHERN WAY 2 COLLECTOR 11,500 7,647 0.66 D 7,384 WINTER SPG BLVD NORTJ-iER~ WAY GREENBRIAR LN, 2 COLLECTOR 11,500 5,280 0.46 D 6,099 WINTER SPG BLVD NORTHERN WAY NORTHERN WAY 2 COLLECTOR 11,500 7,647 0.66 D 7,484 WINTER SPG BL NORTHERN WAY S,R, 426 2 COLLECTOR '12,000 . . 11,152 0,93 D 12,260 SHORE ROAD PANAMA ROAD S,R. 434' 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 436 0.04 C 475 HA YES ROAD PANAMA ROAD S,R.434 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 5,671 0,52 D 3,381 DOLPHIN ROAD SHORES ROAD HA yEs ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 2,455 0.23 C 241 FISHER ROAD EAST LAKE DRIVE PANAMA ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 944 . 0.09 C \,267 TUSCORA DRIVE NORTHERN WAY S,R. 434 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 2,242 0.21 C 765 VISTA WILLA DR, NORTHERN WA Y SENECA BLVD, 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 . 3,840 0.J5 C 1,410 r~e. 10 . TABLE 14 A YEAR 2000 ROADWA Y LINK LEVELS OF SERVICE WITH EXISTING NETWORK February 2001 (3oD) ROADWAY FROM TO . NO. OF . ROADWAY LOS D 2000 VIC DAILY 1995/1996 LANES CLASS DAILY DAILY RATIO LOS DAILY CAPACITY VOLUME. VOLUM ~ GREENORIAR LN. NORTHERN WA Y WINTER SPRG BLVD, 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 1,569 0.14 C 1,141 DYSON DRIVE TUSKA WILLA RD. SHETLAND A VENUE 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 1,221 0.11 C 3,262 SI-IETLANO AVE, CITRUS DYSON DRIVE 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 5,575 0.51 C 4,474 EDGEMON AVE, SEMINOLA OLVD, PANAMA ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 3,250 0.30 C 2,774 EDGEMON A V~, PANAMA ROAD S.R. 434 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 2,930 0.27 C 3,783 EDGEMON AVE, S,R.434 S.R.419 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 3,281 0.30 C 2,480 WADE STREET S.R. 434 S.R.419 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 623 0.06 C 1,034 ALTON ROAD HA YES ROAD SHORE ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 1,246 0.11 C . 1,380 SENECA BLVD. . WINTER SPG BLVD 'h WAY 2 COLLECTOR 10,900 . 2,115 0.19 C 1,418 SENECA BLVD, 'h WAY '.VISTAWILLA 2 COLLECTOR. 10,900 1,642 0.15 C 1,054 U/C.. UNDER CONSTRUCTION. USED 1999 DATA 2000:DAIL Y VOLUM E ARE OASED ON COUNTY TRArFI~ COUNTS FOR THE LAST QUARTER OF 2000 AND CITY TRAFFIC COUNTS IN FER 2001, r J:\W04S9,04\LOS TAil!.!: 14A,WPD p~ e II CIl ! (()~ ~. ~~ t-J . ~, ~ r-.l ~ . al ~p~~ ~"" ~Sg; e CD ",.' ~Z.::s ~~;:lz ~ C. II ~\iln o~~~:n ::c ~"'l::j~.!R ~ 26i3 nal . Cll '. LEGEND: . @ DEFICIENT (EXCEEDS LOS D) CU~RENT LEVEL OF SERVlCE (A-F) a 0 VI > 0. OJ .r.t > ,... z r.' f? 0 z to.) ~ ~ ':::- VI ... 0> UI g- <0 0 ... ;;J\:) ~8 :cO (/)~ .~~ Zz J\:)gG) o 0 9~m C " -oz- O(f)Q )>-om ~oz ~Q )>m =l(/) 0)> z~ ~5 "d O(/) ~ -< :n ~ ",G) )>C :0 m S.R. 0:: U LAKE DR. @ CD RED BUG LAKE RD. ~. ~ o @~ ~ w J: (/) @ ~ -N- ~ N,T,S. r- f (f>> ~ ... :I ~ c::zJ ~ rr '0 ':J i~ . c::::::!) 0 .., N .. ~p~~ ~ ~ 008,",ODl ~~. =0 Z :J ~y~~ m Co !.O~VI "' o~~2:o :t :S:"':::ilJl 0 0>,., - ~~z3 . o~ . ell c.. 0 Vl 0 :> () CD f.I :> ,... z ~ p 0 '" z ::l: ~ -< Vl 0 01 ... ....... ()\ g to 0 ... :E .~~ :o@ cnz -Om ;!;!m :oZO ~~a cn~_ m ?:: o -0 oZ:O ~cnO _-Orij o;O~ g~m g~ Z-o ;;? ~,~ 0 ~ -< ~ J] N.l coG) .C :0 m '- LEGEND: n SIX LANES I FOUR LANES -N- ',"',',',',',',',', '. THREE LANES I ~ TWO LANES ----- PAVING/DRAINAGE 0 N.T.S. EXTENSION . TRAFFIC SIGNAL/ INTERSECTlON GEm..1ETRY S.R. 434 rv 0) I "- .... . LAKE DR. vi :::J' ~ .0 ~ u W .J '(:) oe:( .w RED BUG 'LAKE RD. EASTERN TOWN CENTER COLLECTOR (:) z ~w a... > (floe:( >- <( ;;: I- ...J W"" en...J ...J z2 a::: '--/ w I- (f) <( w ,... Table 15 2010 ROAD NEEDS DEVELOPER AND OTHER FUNDING (Inside City Limits) (Revised 2/2001) Local Developer 1. Improve Tuskawilla Road north of SR 434 (formerly Brantley Avenue). (Switch to Impact Fee Funding) 2. Improve Spring Avenue (existing dirt road) with drainage and paving improvements. County* 1. Improve Shepard Road to three (3) lanes from U.S. 17-92 to Sheoah Boulevard. (County portion) Note: This project is not funded or planned by the County. 2. Improve East Lake Drive from two (2) lanes to four (4) lanes. (Under design)* State. 1. Improve U.S. 17-92 from Seminola Boulevard to SR419 from four (4) lanes to six (6) lanes. (Construction for six [6] lanes completed to Shepard.) Six (6) lanes are planned in the 2020 Long Range Transportation Plan: .2. Improve SR 434 from U.S. 17-92 to Moss Road from five (5) lanes to seven (7) lanes. Note: This project IS not funded or planned by the Sfate. It was in the previous OUA TS 2010 Plan Update. It is not in the current 2020 Long Range Transportation Plan Update. 3. Improve SR 434 from SR 419 to Eastern Beltway from four (4) lanes to six (6) lanes. Note: this project is not funded or planned by State. It was in .the previous OUA TS 2010 Plan Update. It is not in the current 2020 Long Range Transportation Plan Updat.e. . 4. Improve SR 419 from SR 434 to U.S. 17-92 from two (2) lanes to four (4) lal)es. Note: This project is not funded or planned by the State. NOTE: Projects 2 and 3 may not be .necessary and should be watched closely to determine if capacities exceed expected projections. It appears that the City. should start. lobbying for improvements to SR 419 as current counts exceed. the existing roadway capacity. "See also Table 15A. Supplement NO.2 Page 1'1 Table 15A STATE and COUNTY ROAD PROJECTS ADJACENT TO WINTER SPRIN:GS State - TIP FY 2000/2001 - FY 2004-2005 1. SR 434 from US 17-92 to SR 419 - Improve .the traffic control devices/system. 2. SR 419 - Add right turn lanes at Edgemon Avenue and Moss Road. 3. SR 434 from East Street to SR 419 - Resurface. State - 2020 .[ong Range Transportation Plan Update 1. SR 426 from the Seminole/Orange County Line to the Greeneway - Widen to 6 lanes. 2. US 17-92 from Shepard Road to Airport Boulevard - Widen to 6 lanes. County - TIP FY 2000/2001 - FY 2004/2005 1. Lake Drive from Seminola Boulevard to Tuskawilla"Road - Reconstruct to 4 lanes. 2. Red Bug Lake Road form SR 436 to Eagle Circle - Widen to 6 lanes. County - 2020 Long Range.Transportation Plan Update 1. Seminola Boulevard from US 17-92 to Lake Drive - Widen to 6 lanes. Supplement No.2 Page 15 Table 16 2010 ROAD NEEDS CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS FUNDING (Revised 02/01) Phase I All Phase I recommendations have been completed. Phase II 1. Paving and drainage improvements to Bahama Road from Shore Road to Hayes Road. (Completed) , 2. Paving and drainage improvements to Panama Road.,from Shore Road to Moss Road. , (Completed) 3~ Paving. and drainage improvements to' Fisher Road from Panama Road to City Limits. (Under Design) '4. Add stacking lanes to Hayes Road at the SR 434 intersection. (Completed) Phase III 1.. Upgrade Moss Road from SR 434 to First Street from two lanes to four lanes and from First Street to SR 419 from two lanes t6 two lanes divided arid turn lanes.' (Under Design) 2. Improve Tuskawilla Road north of SR 434 (formerly Brantley Avenue). (Switch project from developer funded to impact fee.) 3. Construct Town Center collector road to accommodate new development. Roads will connect SR 434 and Tuskawilla Road for collection of traffic from this area. Phase IV 1. Improve Winter Springs .Boulevard to three, lane capability from Northern Way to Northern Way (east section). This will be accomplished by adding turn lanes at'each intersection for both traffic flow directions. ' , Supplement NO.2 Page 16 OTHER ATTACHMENTS ORC Report for Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment LS-CPA-6-00. [ See Local Planning Agency Agenda Item II. H. Attachment 1 ] Response to the ORC Report for LS-CP A-6-00 [ See Local Planning Agency Agenda Item II. H. Attachment 2 ] LS-CP A-6-00 Plan Amendment Original Data & Analysis Submission Included in the Transmittal to the Florida Department of Community Affairs. [ See Local Planning Agency Agenda Item II. H. Attachment 3 ] , DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS , . OBJECfiONS', RECOM1\1ENDATIONS AND GOMMENTS FOR THE .cITY OF WINTER SPRINGS . AM.ENDMENT 01-1 ........ January 26, 2001 Division of Community Planning Bureau of Local Planning Thi3 report is prepared pursuant to Rule 9 J-ll.0 1 0 INTRODUCTION :The following objections, recommendations and cominents are based upon the Department's review of the City of Winter Springs 01-1 proposed amendment to their comprehensive plan pursuant to s. 163.3184, Florida Statutes (F.S.). " . . Objections relate to specific.requirements of relevant portions of Chapter 91-5, Florida Administrative" Code (F.AC.), and Chapter 163, Part n, F.S. Each:objection includes a recommendation of one approach that might be taken to address the cited objection. Other approaches may be more suitable in specific situations. Some of these objections may have initially been raised by one of the other external review agencies. Ifthereis a difference between the Department's objection and the e?cternal agency advisory objection or comment, the Department's objection would take precedenCe. Each of these objections must be addressed by the local government and corrected when the. ame!ldment is resubmitted for our compliance review. Objections which are not addressed may reSult in "a determination that the amendment is not in compliance~ The Department may have raised an. objection regarding missing data and analysis items which the local government considers not . . ,appli~ble to its amendmept. If that is the case, a statement justifYing its non-applicability pursuant to Rule 9J-5.002(2), F.A.C., must be submitted. The Department will make a determination on the non-applicability of the requirement, and if the justification is sufficient, the objection will be considered addressed. " . The comments which follow the objections and recommendations section are. advisory in nature. Comments will not form bases of a determination of non-compliance. They are included to call attention to items raised by our reviewers. The comments can "be substantive, concerning planning . .." principles, methodology or logic, as well as editorial in nature dealing With grammar, organization, ~aPl'ing," and reader comprehension. . . Appended to the back ofthe Department's report are the comment letters from the other state review agencies and .other agencies, organizations and individuals. Thes~ comments ar~ advisory to .the Department and may not [onn bases of Departmental objections unless they appear under the "Objections"-lleading in this report. b. Intern:ll Consistency: Bccause the amcndment has not demonstrated consistency with statutory requirements for protection of natural resources, and for coordination of land uscs with transportation facilities and services, amendment has not demonstrated internal consistency with the City's goals, objectives and policies of the comprehensive plan as listed: Traffic Circulation: Objective B, Policy I and 6, requiring coordination, Objective C, and policies 1 through 7 requiring level of service maintenance, Objective D, Policies 2 and 3; Future Land Use Efemcnt: Goal 2, Objective A, Policies 1 through 3, requiring protection of natural resources; and Goal 4 Objective B, Policies 1,3, and 5, regarding open space and wetland 'preservation in Town Center Areas; Conservation: Goal 1, Objective B, P,olicies 1,2,4, and 5, protecting natural resources, Objectiv.e c, Policies 6 anq 7, regarding protection of floodplains and coordination; Capital Improvements: goal 1, Objective C, Policy 1, Transportation LOS " ' Recommendation: Make applicable revisions as recommended in Part LA.1.b. Sections:"163.3177(1), 163.3177(6)(a), 163.3177(6)(c), 163.3177(6)(d), 163.3177(6)0),163.3177(8), 163.3187(2), F.S. Rules: 9J-5.005(2), 9J-5.005(5), 9J-5.006(2)(b) and (c); 9J:-5.006(3)(b)3, (b)6, (b)10 and (c)2; 91-5.006(4); 9J-5.006(5), 9J-5.013(2), F.A.C. B. Traffic Circulation Element 1. LS-CPA-6-00: The City has not met the requirements of the Transportation because certain tables are not consistent with the FDOT work program and the revised element does not include a current LOS for all roadways in the City: Recommend~tion: Revise Tables 14, 15, and Figures 7, 8 f~r SR. 434, CR 419, SR 419, and Us 17-92 to be consistent with the FDOT work program. Reflect applicable roadway improvements as s"cheduled in the"FDOT work program as was recommended in the original 98-1 ORe. Furthennore, the City has not revised the listing of facilities iri the program to be consistent with Seminole County. The City should revise the element to demonstrate coordination of facilities , with the County by including a schedule "of improvements. Other requirements should be met under chapter 163.3177(6)0), F.S., and 91-5.019(4) and (5), Flo"rida Administrative Code. The Element should include the current Level of Service for roadways in the City. Given that the data is from 1996 and 1997; the City should revisit the issue to determine if this is still the best available data. The map series should include current level of service for.roadways. The plan includes projected level of service but the table should be reviewed to see if the information is still applicable. "Sections: 163.3 1 77(6)(b), 163.3177(6)(j), 163,3177(8), F.S. 'Rules: 91-5.006(4), 9J-5.019(4), 9J-5.019(5), F.A.C. 5 ':~' . " II. STATE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSISTENCY A. OBJECfION 1. The proposed amendments are not consistent with the following goals and policies of the State Comprehensive Plan: . . " - a / b. c. "" : d. e. f. g. Goal (8) Water Resources, and Policies (b)2, (b)4, (b)8, and (b) 1 0; Goal (10) Natural Systems, and Recreational Lands and P,olicies (b)l, (b)3, (b)6, and (b)7;" Goal (12), Energy, and Policy (b)3; ..~-ooal (16),- Land Use, aild Policies (b)l, (b)2, (9)3, and (b)6; . Goal (18), pUblic FacilitieS, and. Policies (b) 1, and (b )6; " Goal (20), Transportation, and Policies (b)2, (b)3, (b)13, and (b)15; and Goal"(26), Plan Implementation and Policy (b)7. B. RECOMMENDATION The City should revise the proposed amendment, as necessary, to be consistent with the above-referenced goals and policies of the State Comprehensive Plan. Specific recommendations can be found following the objections cited elsewhere in this ORC -report. " .;....... 6 We have prepared a response to the DCA comments on the Traffic Circulation. B. Traffic Circulation Element 1. LS-CPA-6-00: The City has not met the requirements of the Transportation because certain tables are not consistent with the FOOT work program and the revised element does not include a current LOS for all roadways in the City. Recommendation: Revise Tables 14, 15, and Figures 7, 8 for SR 434, CR 419, SR419, and US 17-92 to be consistent with the FOOT work program. Reflect applicable roadway improvements as scheduled in the. FOOT work program as was recommended in the original 98-1 ORC. Furthermore, the City has not revised the Iisting':of facilities in the program to be consistent with Seminole Couhty. The City should revise the element to demonstrate co?rdination of facilities with the County by including a schedule of Improvements. .. Other requirements should be met un~er Chapter 163.3177(6)0), F.S., and 9J-5.019(4) and (5), Florida Administrative Code. The Element should include the current Level of Service for roadways in the City; Given that the data is from 1996 and 1997, the City should revisit the issue to determine if this is still the best available data. The map series should include current level of service for roadways. The plan includes projected level of service. but the, table should be reviewed to see if the information. is still applicable. Sections: 163.3177(6)(b), 163.3177(6)0), 163.3177(8), F.S. Rules: 9J-5.006(4), 9J-5.019(4), 9J-5.019(5), F.A.C. " Response: We have revised Tables 14., 15 and Figure 8. We do not believe that Figure 7 needs to be revised. Figure 7. represents the test network used, not the recommended plan. It was used as the base to determine the required improvements as identified by the model. In reality, the only difference between the Figure 7 shown and the existing roadways (as they exist today) is the test network had SR 434 as a six (6)-lane road between US 17-92 and Moss Road, and Seminola as a six (6)-lane road by 2020. 'Improvement$ to SR 434 from US .17 -92 to Moss Road have been removeq from the current 2020 Long Range.Transportation Plan by the MPO- Metro Plan Orlando. We have adjusted our plannjngdoculT.l~!1tation accordingly to reflect this information. We have prepared Supplement NO.2 which updates the' Transp'ortation .!=Iement and includes revisions and additions as requested. It also includes 2000 counts from the County and February 2001 Counts from the City. We have also included Table 14A, which shows the 2000 Existing LOS Data for City Roadways (including state and county roads), and Figure 3A, which identifies LOS in a graphics format. J:\W0459.04\WD\RESPONSE TO DCA COMMENTS.DOC "',. ..' , " CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS " " TRANSPORTATION STUDY AUGUST 1997 ,. Conklin,. Porter and Holmes - Engineers, Inc. 1104 E. Robinson Street Orlando, Florida 32801 CPI-{ Project No. W0459.00 -.-------- .' ,. ,~ ~ - I 'I' , '. :~ " , ,. J I I I INDEX CHAPTER I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . INTRODUCTION CHAPTER II ........................ FlNANCIAL RESOURCES ANAL YSIS ',', CHAPTER ill .,....... ~............... TRANSPORTATION PLAN CHAPTER TV ....................... CONCURRENCY PLANNING '...... - '--- ,. .- & W g I ,I " :1 :1 I I. f f I Cl-V"-PTER r INTRODUCTION Backg-round Winter Springs, a community of 26,000 persons, is served by one major north-south route in the central part of the city, Tuskawilla Road., and one major east-west route, S.R. 434. Two major north-south routes exist on the western and eastern boundaries.. On the western boundary is U.S. 17-92 and on the eastern boundary is the Greeneway, a multi-lane tollway. Located in south- . central Seminole County in a rural/suburban residential setting, the City's major roadways . pr9vide acc~ to neighboring towns for Wmter Springs residents and employees and facilitate .' the 'flow of through traffic. State Road 434 provides access to Oviedo and the Greeneway to the east and to Longwood and U.S. 17-92 to the west. U.S. 17-92 and the Greeneway provide major arterial routes. to Sanford to the north or Orange County to the south. Recent widening of S.R. 434 from S.R.. 419 to TuskaWilla Road and projected widening from Tuskawilla Road to the Greeneway have positive 'benefits for the City of Wmter Springs. Traffic ~irculation patterns ~'e directly. dependent upon the land uses associated with the property adjacent to the roadway. While other factors such as major trip attraction (a theme park or an airport) can have a substantial effect, it is often the land uses which dictate the current and projected traffic volumes on a given road. A thOI"Qugh examination of the land. uses and projected COnstruction was performed as part of this Transportation Plan update. ...---- PUl"pose There are two primary purposes for the City of Winter Springs Tran.sP<Jrtation Study. The first is to develop a tranSportation plap that defines the needs of the city""l.D.'the forecast year 2010..-The second purpose is to. establish a mechanism for monitoring new development to insure that . needed transportation faciliti,es are in place concurrent with impacts from such development In addition, the following purposes are also important: 1. Develop a plan to guide the city in future transportation decisions; . . 2. Provide the Traffic Circulation Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan; 3. Develop a plan that assures that transportation improvements requirectof ~:'developers in the city are in accordance with the long range needs of the city; 4. Define capital improvements needed to maintain a satisfactory level of service; 5. Review current fmancial resources available for transportation funding in the city. J - I ~ ; I ..1 '~I> ,I '.1' I J ransPQrl<llion Plan Melhodology The City of Winler Springs is an inlegraJ part of the Orlando Urban Area. Additionally, the city , is one of lhe larger mlUlicipaJities Within Seminole COWlty and is localed berween two principal arterials, S.R. 434 and Red Bug Lake Road. As such, transportation planning for Winter Springs . requires close cooperation with other planning efforts within the Orlando Region and Seminole :.Cqunty. For this reason, the transportation planning methodology used to develop the . .transportation plan must necessarily be compatible with transportation planning methodologies in . adjacent jurisdictions. In order to accomplish this requirement, extensive use of data sources and planning models from .',:theOrlando Urban Area Transportation Study (OUATS) and the Seminole County . ,'. . .'.::,~.T~rtation Management Program (IMP) were used in the development of the Winter ,,.::.;. .'>; :"'-i:~::Spiings TranSPortation Plan. The transportation plan development was divided into two phases. These are: . I I I L J I Phase I - Organization and Data Collection; and Phase II - Analysis and Plan Development , Additionally, a third phase of the project was defmed to allow for the monitoring of new 'development: , , Phase III - Concurrency Planning. Wherever possible, existing data from the OUATS and the Seminole County TIvfP were used in the development of the Winter Springs Transportation Plan. This not only provides compatibility with other planning activities within the region bur, in addition, the use of existing data sources minimi7es the need for creating extensive new data - All data collection efforts were designed to permit complete use of existing data so\.U"ce-s'. After existing data -...:ere carefully reviewed, additional data were collected. Among the data reqt}.ired to conduct the technical analyses were land uselsocio-eeonomic data, traffic counts, . . . o. . . tiansportation planning ~Odds currently used in the surrounding region and existing data for '., planned developments witbill the city and adjacent areas. . Ti-ansportation models developed from the OUA TS and the TMP were applied for'existing con,ditions to validate their effectiveness in forecasting existing traffic patterns withiri the v(mter Springs Study area These tests were made in order to validate the use of the models.and the data !nputs to the1ilodels for forecast conditions. In order to permit more detailed analysis of conditions within the Winter Springs Study area, a more refined highway network and a zonal . system compatible with this network were developed. 1- 2 , ~r:f#;~r~[i~;.: ~ ~ Existing deficiencies on city, county and stale syslems were defined and CapitaJ l.mprovcmcn[ Programs identified to resolve these transportation deficiencies. No existing deficieocies were defined on the city colkctor system. I I Forecasts of anticipated land usdsocio-ecoooollc activities for 20lO'were made and the validated transportation models applied against them. This allowed the defmition of future capacity deticienciesso that funding sources can be.developed to correct these deficiencies. I " I .1:", . .: "'""7~: ; 7 W045900JNT .~~'.:.. . '.. '~"., I ~ f " - '---. ,. 1-3 ~: . ....' ". .: ~:. " . . '.,: .. ,.', -. j,.'.. ..~;..~ . ,,: . ... ..' ~. " ill m CI-lJ\PTER fI :'1 M. :"" FINANCIAL RESOURCES ANALYSIS ,to ~ ,,-;:.:'.' ii);<~:\:~:":':1}~;f,: .,.... .:., . . : ~-,;;!;g,:,;:t;~H{flt::~)q~#~~:~gov~niinents in ,Florida ar~:now confronting the fiscal situation of ever increasing demands ~ "..".i'".;',.".f;.:';I.I'1f.'..liF,;;!;;;I,;,.',~v.; ...., . '. ", - .tal' . Co ill..... - --. . d.th d I.. . fr ill. __1 S ~- ~:,\i,.,.~,,~:.:':;.'r:;~;}<IOr:':servIces and capl . Lac tles contraste WI ec llllDg assistance om tra tIowu tate and ~=._...~,'-"-,-:~.-)~l~I';.~lt;.';.~i.:_..:.rI..:I..~.~~ij.t:.._;.4:.-..,..~..\;:. . . ..:.j .";'.'"1.: .". '. . . i~:''':;:.'.;''.::nr.;J:'l:.'F~i;l~f.l.l,soUices.' National i.mper;<1~r\.~es to reduce Federal budget deficits appear to offer little hope ::~~~'.:':." .".I:~1.rrl~.r:'ai~ence of external funding sources for local improvements. In addition. recent changes in : ;:::../:.... "".f:~j<:.:t1i,e..~late, Comprehensiv~. PlannirIg .l~gislation now mandate that adequate infrastructure capacity be '--:~ .\..I.~._I""'~"'!::.,.:.,.~J""\',,,,-., t ,.... ", ," ;" -'~";~., .... ...... . . . t" =.....:..{.:~~:,;.)~,(1.:~.,.~i~.~.:..r..p..~.' '.,"'''',H ~~~r.:' p. .~.:~. :., ," ~. _ ~t.thego.;:.'~."~.' ".' g jW1Sdl~~Oll' asa condition precedent to new devel.opment ; :>,'>::-;~t! ,-~~~i~~'1-l1tlk[~~.The.lo6U'niaD.ifestati6nsofthese 'Ii ..chan es are twofold. First, local overnments ' "i.' .'. .-tilI. 4..:P;J?,.....!'f".....;,:;.:,; ~". , ..... ,,".,'. ., ....,..,. '. ..... PO, cy .... g . ..g. " · ~..':;.::...:;'t!~,;,~,i:rilj~rti1oW.r~:~yelop alternativen.m:dirig 'Strategies' to. accori:unodate new growth and development ~ .;.;:,":r<:(J}i~:JS'dt&d~".tiit'j&a1 government 'must.ensure that the timing of the revenue collections and the ~-..__.}:I",:,/:~,':'~-"~'}::li'!?;;r:.t.t..j~ji~~:r;~i,..:....... .~;.:'l.. ':.>'. . ";~".>' ..: .',. . _. _. ";/::' , .,:r' ;i:8:~7:;'s9R.$.~tient. miprovemeilt construction. are such that new infrastructure capacity 15 available when .:~,,;.._.~:;.:,.';'I::~~;,j::'::~f~ilife(i'to~,~6niInodate new growth. ' . . '. '. . . . . . . "i'::';Fbdj~se'S'.ofthis Transportation Study, funding will only be evaluated from the perspective that . . '. L . r . :;'",,:',:)iM~:;0;RSP.J:;5.~~f9~J&?ed herein are gro~-indu~ed. I,n.cases where a roadway improvement is clearly . ' . '.' ':' req~d to satisfy travel de~d related to new growth and development, local governments are . entitled to pass this cost along to development in the form of regulatory fees collected prior to the oC~uPanCY of the building. On the other hand, highWay construction required as a result of existlng ca:pa~tydeficiencies must be funded through traditional general revenue sources. These deficiencies are. beiilg.' covered' by other City. programs and resources. The transportation impact fee should . proVide' the City ofWmter SpringS'with sufficient revenue to maintain the desired level of sem1:es . .:..?U the highway network within its jurisdictiolL 1.... :' . '. ;'::;.:'.::\~';:;'~Y;;:Cf~~~ci,al' Aria,lysis Fonnat . . ",;:- , .TIlls. analysis evaluates the Cit)' of Winter Springs Transportation Impact Fe~ Funding-to establish ,"'" .' ill "fc:li . . '::';;~~":'~::':i;F'.o owmg: ' ...l'.\~~/?~f"~'; l:~ ';~' . Historical'n::vemib;ollection and expenditure patterns; Project reveIlUe sources available to amortize any roadway deficiencies and/or . construct growth induced improvements; . : >'~.. " ';"" 3.' . .' Provide a Capital Improvement Program format for the initial five year period pfthe .' ""'!::'.:.' :;.... '. _.transportation study. .~: '. ::>~\::.:\' :,>"".:::: . '.' . ;,', . ~,...~i:.'P:;.':',A:'gciierar~ytical framework is provided with which the city staff can replicate the type of fiscal : :~...c'''.~~::~>~'unpaft'-d~~tions provided ill this report. By so doing, the City of Winter Springs will derive '. ".:'::" . '~~wn' benefit from this study. ."1. 2. ". ~ '." . . ~ ';:.\~!':~::,.~.:::--;. : 11- I :~~Itttll;~~~i~: .. :;\ f' H ~ Data Base J1 ,. a' . " . ,Data for this portioo of Lhe report have beeo takeo from Lhe foUowing sources: - . -. I .' '.:;...:.::....\ . .1.' 2. City of Winter Springs Annual Budget, FY 1995-96 and 1996-97; City of Winter Springs Annual Financial Statement, FY 1993-94 and FY 1994-95. '; -::,'i,'" ;,,'. :AlI data contained herein have been provided by the City of Winter Springs and are shown in . . '. . Appendix Table A-I through A-4 and represent all funding sources and expenditures for '. : transportation purposes available to the City. ,...; - ./;,::~<i:,"'i~ts...:. Local Option Gas Tax - During the past five years, Winter Springs has made extensive use of Local -:i~;i~~:;f~4;~~il}>p!i~.n..Gas T~JLOG1).funds.fo.r area wide roadway COnstruCtiOxL In fact, the LOGT contingent _.;;~~A1i~~!K~107(of:furiding haS cdDStitUted the most significant revenue source for roadWays in the City of W mter :;',.:::,::".,,...;;i;;,:-Springsduring.the historical period surveyed. During this time, LOGT funds have ranged from a ,:.;.:,/;;i'~7\lf;r~r{IQw:of S205. 765 in FY 1993-94 to a high of $268,779 in FY 1990-91. Wmter Springs bas used these .' ::,>,,'::,),::,,~;";fundsf6ra variety of transportation related projects. All fuD.ds have been allocated from this fund 'l~. improve existing deficiencies and maintenance and are not available for construction of the growth . related roadway improvement projects. = :,--::.~';il;;li:it.i.:;,6ile: Cent Sales Tax - Seminole County has a one cent sales tax which is used specifically in the 'County for transportation/~adway improvements. ',>' Federill Revenue Sharing (FRS) - Ibis revenue source has typically not demonstrated stability in year to year appropriations. Local entitlements are always uncertain as a result of the Federal budget . 'process, and the program is always in danger of termination. For these reasons, 'it is'recomm~d that this revenue source be considered expendable. The City of Winter' Springs should not consider funding any critical roadway project primarily from FRS funds. Instead, to the extent that FRS funds are availab1e,.if at all, the City should accelerate its Capital Improvement Program, or consider '-".,' adding projects which are not considered financially feasible when' using only hard.revenue sources. ',J;>>' Special Assessment Proiects - During the past twenty years, the City of Winter Springs has oiiIy used : ..,;:/:::?:,this,m6chanism on improvements to Moss Road from S.R. 434 to S.R. 419. It is recommended. that . ':.~>::the.~ity of Winter Springs 'use special assessment projects as little as possible to improve..local . '-:, streets~ . . . , . .."" '. . . .;: ''/'\:;:;.. G6neTat Ftmd Appmpriations - These revenues, generally derived from ad valorem assessment, are ':: .' ,; ..:.<<,....iiot used for funding major capital improvements in the roadway system. They are appropriated to . .;,/~ ~>,};.~:::'repair and repIacement (R&R) expenditures, and to operation and maintenance (O&M) expenditwes. . . ': :":':<':,';.:~,::i\(:, IIi :addition. these revenues are generally used for major debt service by most cities in the State of . ':.:,;:::"'ijt;::):i7':':'Florid.<l.'. The City of Winter Springs has adhered to these principle dtrring the five year period of the ," ij.xiaricial inventory. . ;.", " . .". ~ . ::".;~.<i',:':/i..:': :.. ". ..'......... ". . '. . .{~;li~~~~hC!;". -- _i:.__:~,_.~_">-::"-":!~l':..!? "'~'-".'" . ," :".,~:' :'_'.~. ll-2 ._._u____.____._._.'.._ .. - - ,'__' ," --- ------- .--- -. -~.." '," - --.'.' ...-.'.', ,~~ - ," - - ---'..-:__- '--.i . - - ___ ____ _n_ _ ___ . _ _ . _ _~._-__. _ __ _ _______________ _ ___r.._ _ _'-..... I ._0" __ ____ 0 ._u_. _.~, _.... ____._ r_ .O.~ . ~ - ~_ -~ -;~~~t?:t~J.~;\~{ ~_~~i{~~~}~~~ ~~'~'; :;-. . . 5 .i 1.@os.port3tion Impact Fees :1' ; ...., These are fees coUected from new development/growth for the cOl151TUcoon of new and improved .~ .. ". . roadways.. . The improvements must provide capacity for growth. Impact fees are not used for ~: /{;H~;,i', ;~~..",.:c6rre"cting existing roadway deficiencies or repair and maintenance projects. These funds are used ~1':iji,!!r.4#:;!~~~~~~~:provideroadway capacity when and where it is needed in a timely fashion in order to allow growth ~ .~*~~~~~:~~r.t1f!~~1~r~,erly.:Jashiort:"Itisadvisable to periodically review the projects: funded by impact fees to , .~~~;:~~~~~~{~~:~w.~~.t~~}~ the..fun~ are.going:,to the area.:with .the..most need. i \~i":r,W~;:%'~;!;~~1y:i;i!i~'\;.;~:..;~:'te~)i.; ":"'<:~"':j,' ';.','.'.::-; ::;.... . ':;: H :' '.1":,' . "':.' :.. . "~/~~.fCA!Ii-m.~IJ~"...lJ.lili.:'i.>t'}>:i"';":';';...'i"'::;\';':" . .....; : . . ~ .':~;::::7:~~~;~';'~~}~~'_~~I.~~!{.~r;'.~ ;.I.>:-.::~..~: ". '". . :', . . -I.:&i':;M:ill!~:"i6.~:1)"JRoadW3:)'i:Revenue' Resources :~]li!=:ii~~\;;';o1~;~~~;~;;;""~"~;':"", " , "", ",'" ' ' ',' -':3:!;?;l~~~~-:::::~;-.1'~~:t!!~];~:;-;t:'i:~';~::'J.'::"Y'J..;o.-';em.:. '"pL':":":'uO:only' bard' ':r'evenue . so' urces There~o' reo ::.whil' e' Federal' .._--;---:-'f<~";r"'-'~"l"-'- --.-:-.- -----11' ~ - --:.... LJ.i:l.:)~ ...1.. J. . ;~';,~6~)~ik;J.f.lii:~~j~~i~)j~h~nna n~'~t~t~:DOT'disCretionary:funding may play. a role in funding some roadway ~.~ : .... :.::~~ ~;: :~.:;r.;'~:l~r~ ~. 7~-.-:. ',":,:,~-b -~ -: ~- : . . i..-:;~~'k;"',u;,;''':''II.~eD.tS,\thiS analysis:3sSUmeS that o:nlythose revenues identified as bard revenue soUrces will be ~ :,~;\;'~:\ :iyti~~~.~~~::4;;:;':~; ;9T\"'~'1'~_~~~: - . . ;'-_:-'_' j:::';f~'"; '. '~;~~'~"U: 4~~ ~.a.U' ... ""........."",u,'-I. ..;",,> . . ;. ,.:.;'.: :-.1 i"~~~ ,:~,:,,:;:';';\{d:"'~: ., ~.: ~!.::;":'~J::.~::;'. -. ,: ;~ "." ;;",: ". !_' ~'::" ;.:t~.;\:-~. .""; ;. , " Table 1 I, J " .~. .:" . i-;'~' A:.;".". " Available J:ransp 0 rtation Revenues for Roadway Improvements ....!,. ,'" : Local Option Gas Tax One Cent Sales Tax T rtation Impact Fees - .----.. i ~. . '~~~~\H:'~~5) -~,?~t:...';.:.i:.;:"::' . ."! ::' >!:~ih;;'",:',,: t: ~::jb:i/:'" .: i;}';f!ttli~~'::":;, '.' .;' . ".- . :!t!iltlii~i:,~)i .~. "._,i ,. [I-J - -;~~.~~~~~~:~::~'f_\~';:'~~".~~~:_i~--i!.7~!/~~'/:;!;.:'~:~;.:.~:. '.:" . '. ~ I Ci-WTER ill I TRANSPORTATION PLAN . . ,Thi~:;~b.apter, documents the updating of the transportation 'plan f~r ilie City of Winter Springs. This , ..!,:': p,l~i~:dev~loped using procedures and data from similar planning activities in the surrounding ~'.' jUriSdictionS':as:wellas iriformation fro'm the 1988 Transportation Element of the Comprehensive ! "..".' '\t;~.:'~l~~i;The~lRfr~rn'i~g/p~cess focused on a detailed analysis of the roadways in Winter Springs _ :;:,;::~"~'\':r~;~';;:~,_lIl.C~1l!Jing:th~~umclpa11:~ollector System. . , -:,... .:~~:";- ,:i~:,;i':ii,i,;i~:~%~~~~:~;J:,;,.:.;lk;~~~f'i';:';: ...jt; > ,':: ,,: ,'.-...:': .,: .': . . ::.:> .:::'/~:~',;1}1~;.~ity o(yvr.mter Springs is an integral part of-the ..Orlando Urban Area In order to be compatible - Tt,~i::-;"':'::'::l;-;:~~~:~::;'1r;+....~r~I~~~;~';4j~-I+_........._:~._+k"_ rw__...f_:_~'. .,' . d fdata, fro th Or! _....,..::"";''.<"i-:;.,~\:,y,l.'''!'.A.Y,,\:!{,I.I.......lJ....I..oI.VU~.LI.l'\Uv VU4U\,.lV'aJ.~ extensIve use. was ma eo. sources m e ando - ..........,.. 7.......~..I......;.h.W+L. ", ":~ . . .~. . . ~ ..if.~~~::~I~~~yI~~,?~S~dY.(~{!A}.S}and ~~, ~en:1inol~ .county Transportation Management I '":>.:,,.. :?:f;"':'~~~r.>,~"~);' T~rtatIOi1planm:ng models'and procedures from these processes were also :,.;\~:!~tl~lfl~~i;::Je~_: I !.:. -;:.: .'~ ~ '. ". .':' . . .::::;, TpuEc:'circulation Goals ,and Objectives were developed as part of the Comprehensive Plan and 'upda~edin this study.' 'The updated goals, <?bjectives and policies are as fo llows: I ...;";':1"::":;;;',:.:' ".' '~:~~.-:';:-~.\~.:, ~ ",'\ ' GOAL " I "':' . .' ~yide;a'road:,systeill'Within the City that facilitateS internal traffic circulation, assists ingress and , e~ from tiJ.e municipal ~ and accommodates through traffic simultaneously to coordinate safel~~i.efficiently. econoIriically and conveniently the flow of all modes of transportation in-ao..d .:aroUnd Wmter Springs. . . ~ ... , OBJECTIVE ' : .,::: .}:", ':;:/:~'<'''' , , ',;';:',' ':': . I. ::--~.~~: ~: ' ',. . '. Al '. ,.' ThroulWout the .planning period, the City shall develop and maintain a safe convenient and , . ,.~:":-;~'-:>.'/:~,:efficient motorized an'Ci non-motorized transportation network, through establishiiient of . .. ::,,"\.'::;.;:3;;}<:/)Hcrit~ria..:tobei,eiUorcedduring site pl~' review, concurrency management and access' '{i;;~:~;t!i1!;r!J~~~: ~Kili~ ;mturory'deadline. ",.' ':: .t,_ ...~:;.::~..i.~V.t:;~,:;~:~~~:~.~::.~~..~.:..:;.;:~:.~.~'.<f~;:;. :~: . .... ", '..,.. : ",- . . : . '. ::l.~jF,,"'c;}Wd};';';:;:";:;'::'The cOUector road system shall be funded by the standards-driven impact fee created ::):;,:;;;~C.i.m.;T~lli::~v'~~i:;'C::Ci7~ .1990. by the City. "~;~:[;h~t:)i:fe;\$fJ~f.:[~~~~'2)".-;:;':<:;;<The collector road system shall be developed according to the master conceptual plan ,;i";'::'~:!:::-1i}/'J0?~:~:il~~;'e":.''-:',,':'~-:''and design standards derived under the auspices of the City, to coordinate the :';';";\~~fj<~~ilfM~~WPb~i:';,~,,/: ',',':;construction of segments of the system by both the public and the private sectors. ,&~i~j~i'(fit1~i; " 111-1 .. .~~l-li ,~~;;}j!!~,,:,;,.,> : : . , . ~~~~~&;';~(~i;~~~iiiioi~=tf~~'~'~-'~~'_~_;:_'.i~::' - ..~ ,. f . ,....~_..'!I....L:.~..~'~-...__...................:.-.....r...._~O':_.~.~_..j:'.-;;,' ::"", _____n. _______ ______... ____n "'__n _.___ __ _'_.",_:'- '. ~~~_ _L ____:.~~~~_=~:~~~.~~~::~:__~::~~-~~:~~~~:\~.'.". :~;;:~.~:xr1~~~~~5tf~~1"~}:~~:~.;i~~4~i:'.~~: ':~:,;-:.".:", J) The conce:prual plan does and shall coacinue to address through periodic review these faclors: a. Current and projected deficiencies of arterial roads under other jUrisdictions; .I>;:'j.'~ig;;~~;;(iiij ;:;:Existing~~fiCiencies n f Ci ty cnllectnr streets; and : ',,' :':"::/((i.~JW~~#~!?:{~;~f4&~~\*~';~Vc.:..' ',~~<WinJer SpringS; shall continue to adopt revisions to the Land Development 'l.;;.~i;~,;",!,:,:;;,~~"~~1&~if~.\i1);~~;t:ttj!>;.~:.. ,.:.i~rReIDuatioriS...totmclude guidelines and criteria consistent with nationally- ~ i.ji':;(::.:;:'i::;.:.';,!:,:,;.t~1~~J~V:;~~i8}~i~11i~:}j;;,,". ;';~~:'r~o~i!l0: Stindards and tailo~ed to local conditions which provide for safe . ." ;'.' . ' ':" ".:; ': . ":", ':. ,and convenient on-site traffic flow, adequate pedestrian ways and sidewalks t ~:,;:. }'f.";':~~.';' .;:.;;i~'~q~"~~;~(i\iNi:~<i:i,'~:'i~~as~weIi~~t~Cient...on~site. parking. fOf:,both motorizechnd,non-motorized ;~~\~~f~~~~:i,;;;;,~::;;'~~~k;ii~~i~itlj;~~f;~';;'~><<: ,~ .... . <.. .' :..:.,::.,;, : '.;;:::\~;:>} :'.4).:'.:;.~.rLand development regulations, contain specific access management alternative ,,;!j".itj~t~~~~::.~!~i~~~jji~~~~;=e le~~~f service. These techniqu~ include ;,~."..l ,: :- .~."! . ~ : '_I . ,...... ". :: :: i- ~..": ,. . a. .: Limit access to' roads by controlling the number and location of site access . driveWayS;and other intersecting roads; '1'; . ". ...>:~z;:.".;- :;' :~~~~.:. . b. Cro~~~6~ ~ments of a~jacent properties where feasible; and ..... . . .' , . . c. '. Use. of frontage 'or back-lot parallel access roads where feasible. I. ;;.....:. OBJECTIVE -........- . B).. Keep apprised of the schedules. for improvements and ongoing policies of all jurisdictions w~o~e transportationresponsib~ties within the City limits affect the quality of life and the levels: ofservise;.on:\Vlllch "Wmlei-. Springs citizens depend. ~~:: ~ :,':<;J):~~~ ",~;;;/~:f.>depi(:nc::e.t<>,~tthrCe years in advance of~ded improvements, be selective so ,./:.j;~:~:~;.: /i=."':'::;":' th.a(development'permitted. to proceed prior to actual construction oi the higher '; <.:.; '. ..': .....: '::.;':fY.:~Jj: ':,i,;':;:;.); ::CapacitY."ro'ad:~vill includ.e oD.ly those projects which further progress toward other ,.::;;:j;:."" <::'~,:''':-;~,;W:{l~::~;::::.t~'~t~f;'~~~~\.~~~~f-:'~:.::':'::;;,' ..... H.,......,., '. . . : . '.',. . ...r:;j<::'2},,:'k'Requite'ciJI development plans for property abutting state highways (0 include :"::.. :,,~,;;:''':'::i~j~;:~:~':;~,,:;;>;;d,;:J,\\~,:c()n.troiled access and minimal driveway cuts, with common service roads connecting ':":..;,.,,', PoliCies . ....-:: . . ". 1II-2 ." .- :::: ~:~~,~~'L~';' >.. . .:.';l:N\1f~ik m Ii 10 adjaccnt dcvelopmcnt whencver possible, [0 minimizc inlcrruption of traffic On Lbe principal arterial sections. Coorclinalc perrnining with the D.a.T. Access Management Program. I I ,,3)'::' PlU'SUe one of the objectives 0[. the City's municipal coUector road building program :' ,,::::' ",/i;;qr-that.,ofwoviding residents alternative routes over collector roads. I. .. . . ~ :.:',: :,J.',. '.-, r il. , .. ,.,., ...~, ~ . . . .' .' . ;' ..1 . .,' .... .", ;' .' . . " :'~',f.~ '." ~ , . . . .. . .' \,':i;4)::;;:::'>-,Particip'a~bi~ually,\ m the,'ui)(iate. oLthe Seminole. County. impact fee road .,' i:':;,,,;';;'i;."constr,uctton.' schtrdwe:'to;.'press' the .u'eed for .widening' of' the' northern. section of : .;~~ ::;::!(:f,:;::,:T usciWiu~. Roacl,{ilie' ~nly,iiorth~sb~~.arteriaJ through W mter Springs. ..." . . '; . .,'. . . .' . .' . . ~. .' j I l;' . . .; .,,:.'-. . . ',' :...., ' . ;:;:(l;~*~~j,;~;5.)~,~t~!;.ilcoOJ.tin~.te, dev~ibI>ffifIit!o..t:ai1:pro~:iD.:'the; City' adjacent to:'ftiSCaWilia Road With I ". , " :../....: ,':.. OBJEcrr::vE!:~;;',:, "." I C) , . , Thr:~ti~()Ut the.planniniperiod, . the City:will. coordinate' the transportation system needs !vOtp.:)arid use deSignations; planning forJand use: and transportation is to be closely corr~l~ted by ensuring that adequate capacity. is available to accommodate the impacts of dev.elopment .' '" -'--- "~' _ -.. J .". . ',1 . ~ " Policies I ') , ." ;. : ;~. " t...1ake:bi-annuaLtiaffit cOUnts, plus increases to occur from .as of the. effective~tt;: of the coocUIT!=ocyrequiremeoL , 1":' . , . permitted development I : .... . . .: -'I : I . . . . i::,;:;,'2)(;~.. :; ):~;.'t!o dey~toBnient:ordCrsWill',be.'issU~ ~t Will.degrade the level of service standard :i::,..;,\:,: .',;;i,\~:,::.'~f.D:pili'cil1;i'OOdwaYS.::' LeyeLof.'~rvice' mus( ConSider: vested development and ';".,:..".;.. ,},:\:), !.trcinspO~tion faciiities'cOin.II,1itted':for ~n.strUction'Within three y~. .;/ J 3).. ". Desiguand engineer the coUecto~ r9ad syste.m to minimize traffic impact orr these . arterial roads. . . ' , . . (.f, ,,' . ~'I.I:'.7-', . .~.:.~ ~:' 'i',~' ::~. "..I. ". '.' :'.'.~ ,:\\':;: .' 4);<'~;;::'Create iniersectiqns' of. the: new Citr.::Co.H.ectoi rO(ids with. arterials where they will ;" ,.,.. . " :.:coordinate with th6functiqrnng otarteri31s~' . . . I.. ~ ~ . 5) Monitor the functioning of the arteriaJ and collector road system by use of the 11l ::r: . ,. :," ii'lw~{J,{~~'~~ft~;;'::;; . . .;';;"'~?;;~~J;': i . :g. lli ; TRANPLAJ'\I/FSUTMS model updated (1996) by the City's traffic consultant so that collectOr road improvements may be scheduled accor?illg to vaJ,id priorities. I , " 6) Establish the level of service for municipal collector roads atlaS D. I,. :':..' ',0/:,>::.:: ,~.,,;:,,:f"(:? "I;:(.,,:~;~,~u:::;Y;~~'~~d~~t~~: ~~::~P:~~:;r7p~~~::~ ~':~~ b~~~ . ,- '. ::.. ~: f,';f, : ~ .:. "...,:;,.,:...:';..:'.,.1i::'~'.:~:',.".::I.",':': ',,'.,~;,,':,)""'.i")'\"':" ~.',.',:',~::'. :.',",: .',". .', :~..~.~'; ::_ :~~ii',j. .':. \~:,~~?).:: - _ :~....:: i/.l r,. ~ _ :.::,:-;. ': '. '. :..'~~:., ~. ,::' .-"':;: . . '''., ",: "::"I':I'I\::~';:::. <.~}::~:r.'~:" ;.~.!: ".;;:.: ;.... '1 I . ," . ,Policies . .'~:::.: ", ',", "'. ",' ""';',://'" ..,. . '.' "I):;;,tti~~'~~'~d~!~;~~~'~rEIlU1~~';i;g&!i~J;:cci!~ ibat ,', ~~e~,:the peiniitm~ility :o(propps.ed de:v~lopnientSacc'drdiiig' to' critena ::' ;",;,:eStabliSIieo by an: expert'corisultimi~' ,:' ,:," ,,' ,,:: ';: ",<:' I I .2) . ~ '. . . '. ,', .:.... ,/ " ,:..', -' ,,' , ,,',..;. '"'''' .....,'.:,...'",: :,',..':'," , .. '," I" ':,,'The qity'sha11annuaIly:moniiotthe LOS Stanisi'6t3ite<<;;il:and <i.u'state:roadways within;the,dhymclu~gU.S. Hi~waYs':17 and:,-~92 arie(the EaStern Beltway, by obtainihgfrom the, State and CountY therrmostrecent traffic counts at points along all roadways which would be affectedby:de~elop~endri'the'City. ':. '. !.. .,.... " . f~. I I I 3) Permit no developtrient Viithin themuniciIW limitithat willcause the level of seMce - _'0 . - . 'of any state arterial road to deqeasebelow LOS. D, no sooner than three years prior to construction fuD.ding of the impacted arterial as reflected 'in the Florida Department ofTransportation~~then adopted Five~Y ear Plan. I - I , ' OBJECTIVE I I I I .,' . .. !",'." '.' .' r' .... " . '. '. ;.ii} , . C~te through the,corifigurnJon 'ofthe'City-wi9~'colle.ctO'r:road ~em the interaction and " :~,":'-;-" .,cOhe'sivcneSSt~atliave ~'IaCk:fugamon:gfth~'feSideD.tiahiei~oorl1~':Of\vmterSprings. ,: :;: .:put'do':so in a:'~erthatenruinces'andp~eSthe:qualir.r;op~e'~"1~':~ch cOmmUnity. .'t1:. . . ~ ",'" .....,. :,.. .:.:";~.::.....~'.:"I.~.;,I'.~ .. :J-:':,:,':"," ...-" Policies . ,.' . ", ,:, :'V ~~:' . \: '. ,~ "" . \ " .: :.:.~:. .:: . , 1) ""'""'Extend the several trilecoUectorroads tl1;l,~'1i8:\>i:e~d'aJjrUptly ()'rdegfade from paving to Unizri~ved status Within exiSting;'ri~f~b(j,dfdt4{With8utcp'nnec~on or outlet to , anothe{collector road or, 'arterial, to':cdifip')~(~!'v.a1id,; cblllctor "linkages' for these '.N :.:. ~..:. " . "";;' .;'" ,'. . co mrilUni ties. >1""':"'''' ",' " ':-.;';;.:., '. . ./.:.::f: .....f.......: ..:!;~Iitl~\,:;i,,_jf ,. " ' .... " . . '. . ,;,\"t\,;i!ii:):I~l~;~l;i; ..' .' When designing extensions of existing collector roads (0 their logical arterial connection south of the Ciey - the Lake Orive-Seminola Boulevard major collector that" is planned for improvement by, the couney - choose righrs-of-:way that minimize intrusion and cut-through high speed traffic, so that improved traffic circulation is not at the expense of p~ceful ha,b~tatio~: :. 3>....., . Plan for completion of'~e one-.<i~~e.d.c~llJ~6t~'('.Ip~4si11:e.xiSting developmen~ on a . ;., '.' .' . '.:'.:' ...:,:::1;: '::..neighborhood-by-neighborho04 b~ '~~tMi.,iDptli~'froi.ll: the . resid~nts" is: acquir~d. . I' <;LL .,:A}~:Y:'TheCi~,shal! '.~~~.~~" ~~~&~'~;~i~"te~~.~t~l~l;~;:;~~\~d~';', '" .: .... '. .' walkways to supplement Col1ectOi,'r9~lCIs'~~~~:jeSidentialareas; and parlcs;.schools~ . :1~:..j~~;"{i~ti~;;t~~1~r:~!~1ft~'~~~~*li~~~~~~'L a: . .... .The City, shalti:eview"au;~roPosed::dd~eiopri1ent:for. its.accOinriibdation of . . . ;;,:.:". /....'.. b'iCycle'~dped~~m~.~~~:;;.:~?t{'F(;..< .;:":::.,' <.,:'.:....,..::,...:.".". '. '. '. .:.;;.,'::;j.;: .......>:;.:". b.' - The land dev'elopIIienf:\~gwa~~ps,sh3l1: continue. to ~equire' all new developments, to provid~,bi,CyCle:'parking.'~ace.:.. ~ ~ I I J .1 I OBJECTIVE I I 1 2) .:. .. .~: i . . ..: ~ I .' . '.. .' ;:.~::.... .. .; '. :~":': . ....... c. .' .' ~X:~"'~~~;~~: . - . . ~'. '. .... .-. .' . " . Side'walks or o.ther pedestrian wayS ~haI1 be provided where feasible and appropriate along allroadviays. .' . F) ...... -'""'--- In the design of the municipal collector:ro.ad system, seizeopportunitles to:solve specific . problems. . , Policies' I I I I - . . . )~~~jj)'S', .. . .1 . .:~ 1) Eliminate landlocked parcels by proyidiD.g for rights-of-way to reach th~ pro~rties. . . '". . .. '. . . . ". .. . .' ~:.' : ~ .: 2) '.' . . . Emphasize ini~ved access for ~~~c}<"duCl~:to.:~l~Cied;.~:in thedeSign. . . .' . .... '. ,,':')\~:;;::":;:!/~:;:~;';~{~ir;'/.;:"")i;:,;!~::';;;::~'ii'~~:,~,."J:. . - " . Permit no individual'residential <ix1yewa~ollt9;thecOll~tor ro~.whe~ f~ble_ 3) 4) Encourage "green commerce" Rlo#.g:the .aba.n~oriCdCSX railroad corridor to'create -..,,- an open view near any intersectio~,of cro.ssroads and the tnicks" Green commerce is to be defined by the city: and shali:iricitide suc~ coa:rimerci~ ci.ctiVitieS ~ ~iirseries) truck farming, and outdoor recreati,9~ wbJch.does Ilo~ reqUire'large.areas of vertical construction to block the drivers' cre~ View~ . 1lI-5 . ." , ':f:l/.. . . "~J. '. .'. " "::,~M~ti~I\~j';;f". @ ~ OBJECTIVE ~ G) Conserve the narural environment and augment open space in.lbe. City as functioo.s of road developmenL I " IJ... ,~:r:i ::-',';"".:, : ~'" ~ . ';', ';, '. .:" . .' . : : :,,1. i I'j,~. ,', ,/,:1./>:, : ',,:~.~ : ',:' .! l .'..,.:..:.' :- ...,",> ,:.,....;~.." . .:. '.' , ":; t;':.::.' . ;]: .:. .\;.;..i', .i).. :"'~':"~~.~.'~Fdopb~ns ~e availal>l,~. ch~se:righ~~f~Fi:f?~Jh~~.S.~.~,~~.llF~~r ~em' ,'~ ...:.,' ,.... ';<':,.'.i ...:,..;~'...,&~~~.'~~:l(~ugp."fr.o~,,~tural drai.nage f~~:,3.J~~l:.~Rl~~,M.!?ll~~ ~~:~~xist,With '~::': :", .:;'\.. .:th~ . ..... "':'.:0.-1 ", ',: .!"" Ii I.:"J : ':r1f:("l~ :~,""I ,,~~..:(.t. '. "I.F,' ~ ;-:f)>.... ,I,.; J .'.., ~. I ,. ''':~''~>.....:t'l; esenaLWdJareas. ,,'J', . "::-: '. ;::"~::r:"'.I"'."r:.~t'~.f.~.).~~~J~t!.f.I.:,r:;,:'J.}""':,..I:....,;~l:.. ~f.'" ". ., ..~.:... . -,' , .:,.,' " '~"" '<~."',' ':..', . '. ::, ";:::1/',:;"":: ~:';'~::~::;;':,,',',"1~,;~~,3;;i':;)'~;::~':::::~::': -,~/'~::'::::C':" :., .~ :~.:~:.,:, . ,; .::,' '2)' : /The incmsion of a roadway. throug4. these' nattiraWfr.easjsh.;;'l1i:be'anow&i:If.it~benefits I.: ,;:~~~ ~,_;~: '. -:' ," :.;...: ..,.~.)<; .: ',.:, :'ili~ p"ix'blic';~..A~i;.:':~ciili:~:'for:'~"by':';:rii~rg'~'.''f!~~~~~~'-~t\:~~~rtiriig'):~~hbo' 1'.~:::"':::~\~~~N.~~r ': ,. .11..I~.' ." . I ..\~'l. . 'I!t' , . \"o~~l " f.......:' .'. .'.~. ',t.... :;01,.'", "''''lJ'~~t.!.~\~~;'''~~'-u~'':''''''l' ~.~~~t-""'I... '. . . '. "~I.~,~.t~_ .. . ..':/-:":~,or::;:;L..; "';, .i-..wthildreri;'.outweighii:lg':other CoIicerm ';:'::. ;.., "i'::::~~'{I{)~IB~'S~~~o{f~lf.'M~/YP/fr,;:;:..%i;'/ttni?r~'>,;!;~y ~ .: '...~, ;.;:..;:'.;;~: :: '~ ':' ,.,;.;~ ,.' '~',,~:':., ,"'~:;ff.' '.. < ,:'. .:' :.:\~:::<.: .......' :.'<}\..; ....'/.'.~..:.,.;.: :,~',;'.:;:L;f~~~~~~~f#*~~l~:~~~,;;}~;;~~;iW~~:;~ll:~~ :;;~;};". ,'.' ;,:: ;,' ,(.:'. ~~t>' " ,:' ."';,3),..:,, ,~..~clude:m al,l newro~d plans a~;~~c;:,n,~t":<?r.~~~x~f$r1~@l.~~llit}:i,M~81P,~g\:alid.... .. ';~:lF:' .' ,..:' ;:. ... ..:provide' for mairicenance. in the' annuarQudgct.ot\lli~.Git.>>~:~::;";!;';-f.'~'::,)).:~:r::!':;~::,I~;'.';" ;. > <, '. . , . '. '. ". '::: . " " ' " .. . .';'; ; .;' . ': ,',~: ': :,::; ',>~:;'.":~,"; :~~i}:;~t\;~.::;:~~;:f;';:~:':::~~r/~:~:;r,::;:, ;~:;::;:.':.:;\:";~: '.,~ ':- . " ..: . 4)- ,{)esignate scenic diives,'aloIig'v4llchcoll~t9i.ro~:<:9~ctj~Q. ~U&ad3.ptea to' . '.. preserye as much as posSible of-.e~gyeg((ta,ti9~~#l~:'C:3nc>PY~ ;'.:.: ....,..... . .". " . . ' . . '.:..;.' :,';,::,':"~:";':'Y<I~i;f.:~J;t\;)~T'~:;~i!~:,~;~;:yt,:~~?\-'~;~:,!:i;;;~j:.:),~;' ;,)i';r:." ';:'i~'<::. OBJECTIVE '" Policies ' . .,'~: ..:. . . I. I': I I, I ....:.:: .. I ..:';' .; '., ; : ',t.' ':', H) . .~: ~, ..'" ....... ::;';T:t~}~;;:!}:~.\'J\;:.....:.:..' ':Hr.:,::, ;J Ensure that current-and future rights-of-Way are prot~te(tfiBm:,ericroachlnent ~m structures . . " ., . . . . . '.' . .- '1,.'; I) It.:'-' ;:...; .\"'~; ; ',", ~ . ........ "'. .: . . or ancilIaxy uses inconsiStent v,ith,the designation.pf,ri&Iits.fO'f-Vf.l.YFRigIu.s~(-waY1iecessary . fot' the ~tenance of level of servicC .st3n~an&:ro~.'tI{e.':#i~:.:d~ih:' 6r:to~i in ,_', accordapce with State standatds shall be requ4ecl'Existi.ng:rightS'"Of~WaY shall be'preseIVed through enforcement of setback provisions; which prevent'ericrC;acb.tite~ts into the rights-of- .way,_ ," I I I Policies. 1) , .' '" . ,': ." . .: . ., -'. .,. ..1 :':" . :~:... ,il. ,';, ..-:..., .;:":. .:. ;.: -,.":.. . The City. in its land development regUIatioDs \sJ;Uill: ~ti.fre. th~:4edi~tioh:of au 'neede,d rights:Of-way and necessary roadway':improv,~Cp.p;jfqrall I),cw developmen~ .' . .... "'~ .' . . ", "" ...... . ',",". : ,," I' . . . .... k I. . .'.. . . '. " ,'and adopt provisions to protectCxisting. righl:S~f.+-way'!by,d~ti.Ilg;~ili~;uSe:~aridlor' encroachment by structures and ancillary ~es.. " ' ;<i~l;, ..:,,::',;>:':, ,', ..'..... :-:.-, I I .!'t::t-<y. 2) '" ..' .".':" \:':. . . , 'i:~,"F~jt;.~\:.( '. '. '. ';:: ':. The City shall acquire right-of-way for future trnns.po~~Ori ne~,~;.as f\ill~' become available. ' . ,..' .' . ". . .' I ',.-' . " ::.- ....;.", ". I.. ': . r 1II-6 ."#!' !".';:..:. ( ~.. ':': " .~. ~ . . '.. . . .'. ..):'~!~~~ffii;.f~~)'!~~~':, t '. . ,<:~;{'.;:1~:fJ~r: . . ,:)f~?f~(i{" . . _ ....' J, .;; m ~ m I .1..1 .! i '; :" ':',1 " I I I I I I. I I I ( r E'(iSfin::> Condirion~ To plan for the future transportation needs of lhe City of Winter Springs, a complete understanding of the community's existing transportation system is necessary. This includes a thorough understanding of existing transportation conditions and existing transportation deficiencies. To accomplish this, an extensive data collection and review process was a~complishe~: 1lUs effort included a categorization of the. existing roadways in the' city: and their fuD.c~oDa1 use or' classification, a detailing of existing: traffic flo..ys within ,the ~ity and its surroimding: ~ as revealed . in daily and peak hour traffic ~oUQ.ts. a detailing of tran.si>o~tionpia.n.ni.Dg mopels b4riently us'ed in the area including those uSc:d .bi.Seminole' County and the.QUATS: a deta:iiiJe:;btthe data . . , . ,. '1 '/' . currently used in the area for transportation.planning including computer . cooed 'netWorks and, '.' socioeconomic data, and a review of existing tiaDsp()~on' i>1~',Y/iihintl.i~~'.4idlicijilg,the city.. :.....!.,;{\::::;:::. . ~~tj. and~~e regi~n. . >. "};;~::,~.;';.; ::rt;;;,';ji;~~I~k,;~'~'j~;~ . Study 'Area - The development-of a:transpo~on plan ror the;Sio/ 'of.V{~ter:~p'~~:;\~Uiresa ':.~;!::,: detailed analysis of transportation plans and sys.reDlS in' the city and'theS1.lIIO~CUiig;~:WIi{acrdition" ':'. " " . . , ....'. . '.:..' " . ".', \, ...........::,.... .i'~.. . ",J,''''''~' "'. ': , . to the City's Comprehensive Plan, current tnUisportation pl~g acti:Vitiesgep..erauy~'c<?D,siderthe entire Orlando urban area which is defined asSemiIlole.Orang~.arid Os~la:C9untY~::While the . City of Winter Springs Transportation Plan must consider the. ~lished relationships:between the City and this entire region, a study area for more detailed analysis was de.fiIiecL: .. : ". :,::;:, ". .. ,. '. '.. ..... ...:....',.:.......':::.:.'.<.,":>:.,:.y<?::.;)~h!((.'....:-:'\'. In order to measure the imPacts of growth withixi the City. the stttdy area must inClude ~: of-the city and frj.nge areas surrounding the city that affect 'traffic flows withizi the citj lirilltS~': Foi:the' puIposes of this analysis. a study area meeting these ~trire~ents waS' developed (s~e -F.i~,:'h~,:,'Th.is area is generally bounded on the north by Lake Jessup. on theei1st by the E3st~.Beltwar(€1l117). on the south by Red Bug Lake Road, aridoD. the weSt by u.s. 17-92~'These bOluidaiies'arecoIBpaQole .',~ with traffic zone boundaries established in the OUA TS and ~e Seminole County TMP. Existing Roadways - The existing roadway system within the study area.definCd abOve has been functiOnally ciassiiied in the Orlando Urban Area Transportation Study and'in tb,~ .Semilt~le 'comty 11v1P. These- definitions of roadway usages as seen from the county perspective weIl? reViewed so that a similar classification'Of roadway usage from the City's perspectiveC<?wd ~IDad, ~.- ".. . . . . . . Functional Classification of Existing System - Seminole Coun, ty has 4eveI6Pecta':Set of definitions in order to functionally classify the roadways. in the county a~'rding:io: 'their usage. "These ' . definitions were adopted as a part of this study effort so that compatibility witl1IOca.l plan:nmg efforts could be maintained. Thus, the roads shown in Seminole County traffic segme~t:~unis were functionally classified and were adopted for use in this study. The list of the roadwayS within the study area boundary is shown in Table 2. The functional classifiCations are also shovin:in:Figure 2. Existing Traffic Counts - Seminole County maintains a comprehe.nsive iraffic counting. program within the study area and the city. The most recently published counts from this agency were 'reviewed and posted within the study area. These state and county counts were avail(lbJe. for 1995 [11-7 ,. , . '. "'>k~~:: ". . .,"::.~ . ~ ; I I .I,.~ I I ,. I I I I J I I I r ,I I . -..-......~-/X ~ 1--1 W$~\ .) ~ ~b ~., I 1(~ J ." ////////(A \--~ ' .. ~ ~_~/h e.. ~ ~ . L' : . . HI I ~ LA><E.,{!r";,,-<~;':';' //:cf J~,' j_ I , I ) JTl~_~f.l~~~}) 4i/ \,,= ~e-l ~ ,1[-1 - ); .~~~~. ~ , ,~.~_~ ~~"" /I fb. ~" =0 U ~LJ ~ i i \l,,~' I fJ"";'~.~. r1 ~ II Jlp;-,f\ ,J..r -.. .. I J/Yj. I~ .. I 1\7; ,. I ~~ 1.f)~P% ~u i I~~r ~ Iff~!\./~~~ lJrl_ ~//~::, ::..lu 7T \ i ~ ~ ~.~~ )"'':'a.c..v.u 'c";' f4 ~. .. "j~~ ~~li ~'''''iJl W//// 7: ~ t " ! '~~=;y .--/} ; . ~ ~ I 4'9' I - . ~'}.s- .. ":.' . ,~I~--5}~ ~ '. I \\1 ~~ . -. rr::::..;:J:'::;/L.. '. m .." l'A f\ ~ 1 ;,,!..it-') ~ !_ .~ ._. .. .. i'7;~7:' v. ~ ::u1J ~ . J ---..,- "li:b I { : " ,no "'.. C.)oI WINTER 1\, '{" I . i. I',.:; ". L~ ~ ~ I J \~.:: ~D., SPRINGS r J \I. ' , :/\. i. I ! . ~:,: . . J'.:.I . .l I 1.1 ;.-;::J I . ~ : ,I n. I _ I u-S ';Vlk) ~ i \ .I.. STUDY fREA .. ~. fl /.1'-c-. ~ 1;;'l~ '~?l. · ~ J~~: ,. I~",:j f , . i&A~OJEIt , '.trl.'...._ 'W'~ I )1 ':: :::~~ .;, . J ~ S.~~!NG~ Q7 . ~I .~-: I' \. ~""-'<I / 7j 1<. ";""AV"~ ~ h -:. : '". ~ I "CD ClUQ ~ .1..cw....,.., // -1. ~ ~'--- .'I,;'j.~ <c 0 ~ T I, I ! I. '. ~. . i I i ~~~0:Y~~~ em.. ~ . . S ;0--". ."'''- ~~..'" I - . I ' I ~ -- ; ~ I ~ I . oi. U I i I --:~o: ~ I Y/~ --'"': ~C"~\. 4 _ ~ I ~. ~. """'''<U:._",,- < I P a/~, i v I ~ ,~ MAITLAN. ~ ......."..0<>< . 0 I . ~ -:./. ~ I ~'y=~~ ~; ~ EATO~... ......,.l~ ."..... \L\ : \! ! j I I ~d:' 1 ~~ . ~ vi~.~: .--::; ?~i i.;;: ~:ii..~? B:~~fNROq I h i r 1!~~1 (~I I, ~.,.J 0 ~ ~-j2J 'Y;~k::.::: I' .-. ~r-L.~~.~ I ~ \_~~ ~ . ~i\1 ~ ~.lt''f~TJ_A~',,~~:::,~,~~ 1\7~.~ ,~~ I!~~~~ ~ ~~I .~... I I I" . P'~n:/- . ~ ~ :~-:L~~\'Lf'.....ag'o" ,,~:~ W:~j~~ ~:::-:"'''~' :.~Ut~\. I v~~;~fJ ~"""'k.... I ~ FV" r 1 .f ~ --;. ~..'t" ~ \\ ~~ . I..... ~ v I ' 1'~~ \)'''7k:,,: f& .~:..'6I!J!;' - -"~~-i- jbA:".~~ ., : ~\ .I.~.~;..:.:: ..'. '.~ .::, '~'I . . K~ c' ~,,- . r....oo i: <QO e .~~.:;i: ~~~-(kl{ . ~ ORLAND( _ ~._~ ... ~ rr=-- j= ~'.~ j .. ~ ::!~.~';::::J;.:-':. '~~'" .oj t 6 I J , ~ j. I '. .' ...,.\.; ....- ". ," .:il ;:~. I :~ :. ;;::::--d"~;b': ~~.~ :;'::-.:; -=.~.~':'~ 1"-~ ~ . -.A- t- ~,,:; I ~ ~ - ~.~~ ~.. ~ n:1~"~;:'~ "'~' _C..V ~iii::l ,~~~< .~ ~:~~/~ ~x..;.<:';;..;~v ~ ...~:\.. \ '"~' ~:~ ~ .-.- .... .. 'o':'J..o.:- _....,.:~...':.~ ....~.. ~o I U~"r~ 1.... ~~ ~ ,:':,~"d':'-~"'~'~ ;;;--'--w1'1~ 'i:l~i..'::'.;: :.'~ "':~' Q.J'::"~~~;:':_~ '::.;h .... J ; ~ ~~. O<CA_~ ~ i~~;?'K' . 'TJ".\~ ~.~ :0rf~~cr ---1"'<v--"o'l"". :'~~~~;~I.?V:"'.'~..', )~I ~~ ~. ~' ;//NN'~ ~ . :.: J" :-. -: j:~ "'::.".' > ./. ~. ... !' ~ ~.::..~ ~ ~~~'::e:~~ -. · ".,:- n ~ _.'. ~ _ ':..::r-: _~ ~J : lm~l' ''''_' I : : / 0'////,0 ~~. '/~ ..il it ~. :~. COnk:/In hortQr and Holm... XAlL: ,II:; ~ g 104 01 H1(I{nII, IHC. O^'L J-I<-'17 Ito. ( HO"'''";/,1. \I"" r 1~11 ".."..~)I\ 'l.v.,u.... JJ,..." . ff n "l uti .:>."..~' J)ll "0.' Mle:;') UI , .... .." .,." - II) /I STUDY IV-1::.A LOC;" T'ION WlNTEH SPRlNCS "'i'il;'\.1'lSPC~IT ^ T'a-I STUDY flGURE '. ....:::. l:':;Dt B Q ~ r'\ppendix) to respond [0 the change in land development asswnptions and minimize the impact on residenlial areas as provided for in the Transportation Goals, Objectives and Policies, previously desfribed. This lest network is illustrated in Figure 7. . .' . ! . , " " . '. J.', ........ , " "An~,~alysis'o~ the asSigIliIlenr. o.Ly'ear20 ~O, trips lo this network is provided ~ T~ble 14. It is clear I .:;:'.... </;'~~;{:'~Wi~: ~:~ll:ii1~~/$et~~?~~:e;~; ~r:;~ts~~~e~Ze~;::n::;~~:~~d:~ .' :. :";.,::. :::?V:~>:;lriipi'bV~meniS. ai~; p:finailly'loa:the:arteii~ system'aIid.'.the' respoiJ,SibilitYfor making most of these .1.' ;;f.<;.::.:k;i1:M::~PtP~~~~*~'~:~~?fLM4~~'i'~i.~;'i~~~~:'F1.rid~IP:~~i1~.of.r~'itatiOri or S,~Ininole . . ::);" ,..;~/'~i::f';"Co:~tY..':' Ho~ever;\'tKi~;:~ 'a5Sjh1in~~,~i~omdicateS:.~tsor4~iimi>ro.!)~mentS are needed on the '"' '" -:./,' ,"ioca,('street'system. theSe imptoveIri,~nts'are th~:.resP9nsibilitY,()fthe CitY.~. ". . . 1.':~;;ji~;:!P;.k:':.:':~r' '\'~~:::.'()':~~~"!"" ,"/::".~~J~lt:~!:~:~\/:;?:'X~<iij~~~~k~}\ i;:';~~S;>i,;~:.~~$~.:t: ::;f" :-.:;;;:,:.:... ,: . '. ;.;. ::'" . " . ---.....-- m:l "lransDortation"Rla ... ....... ". ',..,- '~~r'~~" "r'. ,'. . ~'--~f.r;~'SIi?I~.f;T~ij~~;'::~~~:'7,~:f~f~ ~~1~..;.,~,. "..... , ... :,,;..~~~":;j.",', ><.':I,:r:,:<' ':~~l!:'l.'..~i'< :~"::;~~!. '." : .": .';':- :', ...., '.< ,- '~i~!" .t)~,!\~,~:,.,.. tspfth<;:. ~&,run~tS}.. ".,..esr~ High~y N~~ork \yere analyzed in ord~ to develop a ,:,,, : :.:,i.::=-:: ," f.~/fi3D:'ih8l" 'reseiiiS':ili~.road~":ilii rovements "wred in' the Ci . ofWmter S' rin . and the , "'_~':"'~~"'< ....\.~..o:.',\'"i"'."! "'.Nrlt,':..rr"~I1JL,.;...". "~'I:.. ,ty. . . p gs I. . ~:: / '. ::~d};f~. ". ~r:2.0 1. ~(~l~J~.~.' . :.~)ff.t~..:h ."~.' iri~I.Ude.inlprov~~~ committed:to by FDOT (5 Yr. Plan), .:',"those;Comii1ittedtob"/Sem.molefOo.un"arid in th6,.QUATS2010 update.. These are Shown in Table . , :1 '" "':""'~"'r~~'" .':' ...... .......Y:.'!... ':':;"'1' ""':~'."::(':;"4.'~1"'" .." "I' .... ,'f I .. ".'?~ :,.?tli~seiIDi>roveiiienis':riero:d.: w~~llie':City Limits that are funded by sources other than the City . '.:.areshown inTable 15. Proj~~~t.cU-e.the City's responsibility. are shown ,in Table 16. I '~~'; "'.:. .:~!J.~'~~~~;\~>~g:i~~~~~~'.~l~:::i' <;'::.( .:.. " ;.... . ...... .',. .' ':: ! :~. ~:~;'.'~~r:if':}' ',: i' ", .:. ',: '. ,'. :.:. '.:.'.~ ":';~"~''';'':~~r'.:,;,~'; ': ': ": ' .' :: ", :--. ' ...... .. " , I . . I '. . . '.'t,' .'.. I -.--- I . .': J ,. ".r ',. -I" :':'.:. ,,' . ......... .' . ,i;,.., .:.' .......i...... . '::.'.f' I. . .'.. ". ',,1'.:. " . .' ~ . .;,.:.:....., . l' :. ...;, .!:..-:. , . " ..". ,'" . .', ,':'." ;: ~d~j\~~~i6t;,;;,::::. .' . . . )O':",~ . ..';i!~,t!,,/{;:;~~':\'{~f~;~;;i"~~iir,g;~'J~,..... t-.'!""~..........I."::"':" -.- - . !~~.:(i ~"~:7!V,' Q E~:;~.~~-~~',:< j " . ~;i~'; .i:. " ~..~.~.:!'~ ~':j""~" J, . ~~~:;"~ ~:},..;.- ~i~fi;~.;;1~~' ".Q.,,,", .:I:~ ~x. .,,'0 . ~ 0 ~ .:-~. - :l ~:. a % ".,::1.1'0. 5~ h Jl: ; ~ ,. >,.,:.::1 :x: ".~;r~ ~ ~~{~ " .:-.:,-"q~ ....3 li~~: · "llj t~ '~, , :-;"\~_ >....~~ i %'. . 4~1,.,,,,, )L;i 1~~ ~I :,/:;. .,:~t.~'~-~5:": .w ~._..., ' ~~:~> :~~:':': . N' ." 0 ,',~'o . . ~'rrl '~~ '! :r .':: ,~ . }> -< . z }>~ ~~ ~ o -< ]) ~~ ... - .. .. .., .~. . . '.'." ;~.,......;~...... .. -- .. ~", :,.:.~ - -- I -. '~'. '. :,..j, .' ',~; .:'~ ~i:.: ~ ~ . . "~;~;C;'i;jf!~:~'" s,xf'~}'~i7""'" .... ".':-'.':: ""~':)i II "FO~~:.L.A~ES . .'."" ~,,( ~' , , . . THREE LANES .. "(;' .':". " ;',,' ". "..,' . .- . 'f:f:' nvO}ANES ... '..' ~~ ",. .. "'.{:.?f.~~,'.~,;,i:: :"'>',::, '.:':" ' . ' .?;at'<~/ir~r;*;,. ....... "~Y';' . . , ....if~:~~~,. -..f" :{~'<':":(. . f?}/f!. ~'~<,;r' ..,..;:~.~in:. . " ..~...~.. ~~~ .,:.....- ~ r!. .... >- <( ~. -J W,......" co::J zO ~t:. Vl ~ . LAKE DR. RED BUG LAKE RD. , f "'-..:"., JC:::I:( ttx:m t:t:::'.1 .....~ -N- ~ N.T,S. "::' .' . ~ (. ..... ~i~!r}:.:'~; <~;~;;~{L: , ..- - - -. - - 1'AGLEI4 ' YEAR 20 I 0 ROADWAY LINK LEVELS OF SERVICE WITH 2010 NETWORK - - ..- - NO. OF LANES ROAOW A Y cLASS JIiIIIIM LOS'O OAJL Y , CAPACITY .... ''?i;,- .:..;'....;. ,; I' ~. . '~ 118I ~ (Io()) ROAOW^ Y FROM TO "t. VIC RATIO MODEL DAILY LOS U,S, 1).92 S.R.04 SHEPARD RD. C.R. 419 MOSS RD, : C.R.~19 TuSKAWILLA RD EAmRHBELTWAY '\ , EDOEMOH ^ VE, S,R.H.c . FISHER ROAD ',Tus4:~ILL^ Ro. ',: EAOLE'SLVo,' U,S, 1).92 SHEPARD RD. .. '.. .' ~ ,..... '" E.0:~'oRIVE, ' .,::', ;, ~'"",trrE~ Si>oSiSL VO ':':.'- . , .~ ,.,~~!~POP nLVo", , S.R.~H . .. ' , SIIEI'^RO R.Q, U,~, 17-92 , SHEOA.H BLVD, ( SIIEP^PJ) PJ), SHEOAH BLVD. EOOEMOH ^ VE. SIIEONi OL VO, SHEPARD RD. S.R. H~ O^HAMA ROAD HAYES ROAD'" WINOINO HOLLOW BL MOSS ROIJ) PAHAMA ROAD DOLPHIN ROAD MOSS llOAl> DOLPHIN ROAD S.R. ~~~ ... S R. <)( U,S. 17-92 S,R,<)( MOSS RD, S,R, Il( C,R. 419 S R, III TUSKAW1UA RD S R, 119 U,S. 17-92 S,R:1I9 EDGEMON AVE: ,'E. LA.X..E ORI vE SEM/NOLA BLVD EL';Ki.' DRivE .. FISH'EA RoAn . ... .,." :~\" ':. ":\ . " .' ,. , --: RED BUO LX RD ,: .:' ':::: :;:.:.~::~':~i,~f~": , ',,~(jL~:B,LVD: ' .;.:, .;::.:-....... , TUSKAWILLA PJ), , ,E. l,AKJ! ORI VE ': ' ' ~ -"',~". " . . ,...:.;. . '.' '. '.'~: . WI.NTER;SPOS BLVD JROTWOOO BLVD. 6 ARTERIAL 6 ARTERIAL 6 ARTERIAL ARTER!AL " ARTERIAL ARTERIAI,/ ", ,",. .~, , , :~~5.(.~:, ARTERIAL .,~. ARTERiAL COLLECTOR - ...... ,4 COLL,E9TOR; ,:::, 6 ^RTERIN. ." ....,..: ARTERIAL , , ART~RIA1. , - ", ^R.TI!RI~L '. ,ARTERIAL ,COLLI!CTOR, ',::, 2 COLLECTOR ' COLLECTOR t COLLECTOR l. COLLECTOR 2 COLLECTOR 'It ""' .':::&:t(\:, " "'--..4~"..,t-. :::~:<I~':ii;:f, : 31,100 i~;ipo ... t:i.: .i'~}tY . . .::."-~. . . ". 't::\..~:, ',. ..':'${~~':'.:::,:.:, .: : :~ :~'.,.. .' , , 10.200 ,'..,~~O . (7)00 47,'00 ''';'.J. , "'.2,:200. '~ ;; ;S:2oo .' .... ',: ;..':;~.:;. ...,.- . ~ ~.....'. ';','. ::'.? ~'.: ;'. ". 10,200 . ' ,I,~;'f,:':~" . 10,200 "iOo . 10,200 6,100 10,200 7,300 1.10 F 1.16 F , 1.31 F . .: .. ." :~~4~~:.:~::' :..' '." : !)9 ".; , F I.~'~. ' F '~.;t.; 1.00 o o :"', ..~ I ::~"_ 1,;':. ,0 F o 0.6' C , , .' ' .'.,,;:.,':::-; ...;:;' '., '1.10, E 0.71 o ... . 0.12 0 0.01 C 0.67 0 0.72 0 eE2n r;,: '?1 :.J.' ,';.;...:~ .'"'. .,";'. . "--_.IL .,.~_ - - - - - .... ROADWAY FROM .... - ..... . .. ..' ',~ ..... .... ...... '. . ....._ ~},~;t~ .., .~... ...... ..... MOSS ROAD S.R. ~3~ ... .' ~: . '. . TABLE 14 YEAR 20 I 0 ROADWAY LINK LEVELS OF SER VIC~.. . WITH 2010 NETWORK, '. TO C.R. ~19 I NORTHERN WAY TROTWOOD BLVD NORTHERN WAY TUSCORA DR. NORTHERN WAY VISTA VILLA DR. NORTHERN WA Y , TROTWOOD BLVD NORTHERN WA Y WlNTl;R SPO BLVD, NORTHER.loo/ WAY SHETl.AND A 'fE. , . NORTHERN WA Y GREENBRlAR LN; ..: .~~:.: TUSCOM DR. VISTAVILl.A DR, WINTER spa BLVD.E WINTER spa BLVD.S , SHEr~D AVE: ..... ...... . ~ . '.. ,":. '.':'~. a~~BR.IAR LN. WINTER SPRa BLVD "~~i~~J~}';t\;~:~o.BLVD~S~WI~~: ",~~]E~ WAY '~<:';WINTE'RSPO BLVD':.TUSKAWILLA RD. ::';' NORTHERN WAY ~:"~',:'~~'.:"'.::,':.:;,,-~~":::'-~';' ::..~:.~..;.;....:.;'.. .~. .::~:'. >:". ,..:: :'~ ~, .~ . ..c:;':WINTER spa'BLVD ".~qR'r':lJ~.WAY-:"~:aREE}o.lDRJAR LN... ....:: ~.~~.~;.\-::::.. WI/o.{TER SPG (lLVD . ~\YINTER SPG BLVD' .~. .... ~'. . . '.' ..-.... N6~TIiE.RN W",v OREENBRJARLN.' . ".NORTH'ERJo.! WAY NOR.THER~ WAY WINTER spa OLVD 'NORTHERN WAY PANAMA ROAD . EDGEMON AVE. "'I'ANA/-'A I\OAO .. , MO.SS"ROAD ....... \ , , BAH,WA RoAn HAYES ROAD HAYES ROAD DOLPHIN ROAD DOl.l'llIN ROAD MOSS ROAD ", FISH~R ROAD EAST lAKE DRlVE ~: .}....~,...- .... . S,R. 426 . MOSS.ROAD , .~ . l, '.;. SH9~ ROAD DOLPHIN ROAD . : S.R. ~34 HAYES ROAD. PANMfA ROAD NO. OF LANES ROADWAY CLASS 4 COLLECTOR 2 COLLECTOR COLLECTOR 2 2 COLLECTOR 2 2 2 COLLECTOR / COLLECTO~'.. COLLECTOR ~ 2 COLLECTOR: 2 COL~~CTO,~:;t: .' " .' 2 2 COLLECTO~" 2 3 '-.'.- .~0~L7CTO~;-~;, COLLECTOR ,. 2 COLLECTOR ....; COLLEqOR' , 2 .' . '~;.' COLLcCTO~3~>. 2 COlLECTOR-,," COLLECTOR ,:,.: 2 , h COLLECTOR. .. I \ 1 COLLECTOR '. ' III.)) (2 or 3) .' /- Los D . DAlJ,.Y.' '., CAPACITY: 22,600 . ~- ~;: . .MODEL DAl!.iV VOLUME ' . VIC MODEL RATIO DAlL Y .' LOS 0.62 0 0,60 0 .. 0.31 C 0.35 . C 0.25 C ,':.' I~,IOO 10,200 10,200 10,200 10,200 , ii: . 6100':'" . .:...:. 3,209.: 3',6~;;:;:' ..:"':: 2,500 ' :;:::~;~ . .;ii~r";";;::;;;"~{fi;~;X . ..~~3:~~:(;:,..:> . 0.22':\~;-.~:;.e' ".. '. ;:J.:'~f.~:::::;f;~\~>~: " :;~~,.1:li~~1\I;r~~,:;:,"&,J;~, . '10,200. I O,,~Oo. ....... W,209 22,600 " -:.II,90<L", >": 0.53 . .' . '.. ......::~:!::i.'ti;.:... , ::::=;fig;,t~~~f"~":::: .. '..;".:,,:",". . o D C .. .......:..~: :, -. :::::, ';JliJ'Ei:::: 10,200 2,700;~:: . 0.26 . :.' .:. --;.9 '". .: D' G . ..'".....:.:~..~.... 10,200 'I';~b~~\:'. C O:I~ tm:ll1 J:Im3 ~ ...- ~ ..... ROADWAY ~ - _.~ -- NO. OF LANES ..... .... TABLE 14 YEAR 2010 ROADWA Y LINK LEVELS OF SERVICE WITH 2010 NETWORK - ,LOS D DAll.Y CAPACITY .... ~ : . ~-. -.t', .....:.l!r: MODElS;"" DAlLY::: VOLUME ... ,,... , .... -, FROM Tq ROADWAY CLASS (3 on) VIC MODEL MTIO DAll. Y LOS 0,27 C " 0.39 C , " 0,1$ C .' TUSCORA DR.JVE VISTAWILLA DR, GRE!:NBRIAR LN, DYSON DR, SHETLN-ID AVE, SHETLAND AVE, EDGEMON AVE, .., . .. tll:' ,EDGEMON AVE. . EDGEMON AVE. :~~;;i;L;':(!.ii: ....:....;. ...... r4~~~B": .. .'":' .,.:,..... .....' '" ....:...'.,;;.;.... :';:.'j~:.:" ';-. : "j,' . .~<.r;:.':: .-. . ~. :" ,\~''''''( ;",:, , NOR.THERN WAY S.R.U4 NORTHERN WAY S.R.4H NORTHERN WAY ." WINTER SPRO BLVD, TUSCA WILLA RD.- SHETLAND AVE. RED SUO LAXE RD DYSON DRIVE DYSON DRIVE NORTHERN W ^ Y , SEMrNOLA BLVD PANAMA ROAD SHEPARD ROAD S.R.419 S,R. 434 SHEPARD ROAD ,. '. :'~' :::. .' , .,,~}4~;i~.~.>;;:;'.:.,,;,: ' : ' ; .:: :~: .~. . :;; .'::~ /. '\::' , , r , 2 COLLECTOR 2 , COl.l.ECTOR 2 /' COLLECTOR 2 COLLECTOR " 2 COLLECTOR COLLECTOIl.:~':: 2 2 COLLECTOR' , 2 2' COLLECTOR COLl.ECTOR 10,200 10,200 10,200 10,200 10,200 10,200 10,200 iO.20.o 10,200' , 'f: 2.7~ , ,I'; . (O~:~C., , ~..;\b..;"..:.:' 1 $00', ':?'::fi:: ...., ,.;...., ,., :2,60Q:,,, . .:........ .~...., . . ; 0,26 C C C .. ., , D C '1' D . ... ;:i~]i:::.d~;.. ;~I~,;i,::: . . . :', ~.:.::." . , :: t-:::. :.;~ . ..... . "....;,. . . .;. ': .~~~....~;~~~..!. ::.. ':r... ,';~~~::: ....:;.. · ....... .;(:i0;!.~~j~f~'~.y:titl'>l.... . ,~:- ~'~.': . ":',t\ ,~::..".'. '.' ,',_.' ....;.';;.: .-.~..... ~~'~1t: '~.::~~f' .~': '.-: ' :-=~":.; ",,~' ,".-i : ,.. ~'. ....;: ~:..:. .,.:' '::i:~;-'. ,..,.t..... 11I;34 ... :-.-.,,-.'-"'.: ~""."L'- .... . h....~ ":,:>~:,:. :~J-I~,i\~r"""" ...... mrm, m:I:l ( ;::;::n ':":' -- --- MIIIIlS .-- -, -- -,~. - .. .. _ _ ...._ ..._ .. _ ~ 0ffi (f2)~ ~ lQJ~ 'dn ., ,. ~~_..c ),=".",., ..,..:1.: Z C~~I'\C~ .....p z - ~. II % ~ ~::~!..c. ~q~ Jll e~> ;II::: '~..:3 A 0 ~ s. ~- - ~:ji3 ()C . Cl @ 0 ~ > z f:\ F f? ..., Z I ~ ~ Vl I . '" ~ ..., ....:~ N ~:~;~. ~ . g u :.!,~ :_;7~ 0 .''-' ~ '. ~.~'~' ..~.~ :::~..:~-:::..,. ~..~ LEgEND: < ..... L..~;.~;'.. i' EIGHT LANES SIX LANES FOUR LANES TtlREE: LANES TWO LANES PAVING/DRAINAGE EXTENSION TRAFFIC' SIGNAL/ INlERSECTlON GEO).,(ETRY ,I ~). I,.~,', I,). I,', " : . i.~' ff, ..~( ----- "'0 ...\:;.... . ?~'. . . . . (!) 'Z .g: ~ - -< LAKE DR. >- ~ rj- .m ::1 ZO ~c t/') . . -< L..! i, . . RED BUG LAKE RD. ""':',. r f o .0 . o. o ..':. ..' :::>'~~{;j~::~";i: . :. "~~/'~':~.}. ::-. .....'..;-.... :" ....\.. . .....::.&t~/?~:.,~:: .' ~ -N- ~ N. T,5. 1] ~ ii. I ,I." " I I I I I I I I J. I I. 1 I J T a b'l cIS CITY 2010 ROAD NEEDS DEVELOPER AND OTHER FUNDING (Inside City Limits) ,,' , ", .' .. ..:i;~~_;"":i';;:;f;;~:)$~;'i;t..'.'; !i,;;:,._,} ., ,.. . '. "'\1""':",.1;.:.;".1';, "':/'('r~i",'t":"';11~"\J.... ' . ':,,_r,:..;......~, ..... :">:'::'~.~}\~"/:"'\/:::.:~)}:>.~~k":C" ':':::':iti'::~::.:: Improve Tuskawilla Roa4 north.ofS.R. 43.4 (formerly Brantley Averiue)):'\.~ ':i.)t/:}i~:;:W.\i;"~<!: :,,';';,:~,:':';Y'i1! . .' - . ..' .'.... .~.:./. . ;'. ".: . . : .'.~ ''',. '., :<,.'. ...... ,:,::i!/~~:~~;~:f~;:::;+;c;"U;}i;i'~il~~~~;\i{,r:::N!d'!~~'1~t-;tt: . .':. ",':'~~'~~h+ Imp~xe. Spnpg A venu~;~th:~e' Ci,Ild, paymg"lJl?pr:ovements0l~\;~,~~,,(;; i"::rti~~..j~\;~;'::~~!~~hr;;!~~~Wrrb~9 . C~un~ .. . -. "', '. .->~; '1-:J~'~:,iitt"i',~~~;jilt~ . :1,' )<~;..:'; ::: i~;::: .::' ..-.:.;.~. '~'., ...:. :~i~~( Developer . :~. . .' ." 1. ....: C~nnect Shepard Road.t<{Edgeri.:1onAv.~~ue. ..' . . 2. 1. Improve Tuscawilla Road from two (2) lanes to four (4) lanes. .!. ~"Iil: ~ It: .' . ,. 1_" . . . 2. . . ',: Impro~e Shepard Roaq-to three (3) lanes from.U~S.'17;.92to SheoahBoulev3rd::iw:;:~~iFiin< . . .' . . . . . . ". ..... ..' ..' :.~"":':I'.'~:~~~.)~:_:l~l.'>,: :p~~~' :.,: J~. ;r.1::;{: . -. . I 3. " Improve East Lake Drive from two (2) lanes to four (4) lanes. " , . . '1': :. ;. ~ ". . State "0'.: '-~ 1. Improve U.S. 17-92 from SeminoJa Boulevard to S.R. 419 from four (4) lanes to'eight (8) lanes. 2. Improve S.R 434 from U.S. '17-92 to Moss Road from five (5) lanes to s'eveii (1) ola:ries. .:: .:',,'. 3. r .. _. Improve S.R 434 from S.R. 419 to Eastern Bel~y from four (4) lanes to siX (6)lailes. . . : . " ~. !. . ,l ;,~:,~~: '.. "':' 'f. 4. Improve S.R 419 from S.R 434 to U.S. 17-92 from two (2) lanes to four (4) lanes~:.:: . . -.....,' .. 111-36 ,. . ;~'.: ,i: . '. ....;.. . <.~.;;: '. :;.~.: ~ ~ ~ I , ,. .' " I ....l:......,. I' I ., I " I ] I I I I .' -, . . ',,' . :.~~:::;~... :::'" :". _..1);, .. "".' 2)":'" Table 2 1996 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION ~ER SPRINGS TRANSPORTATION STUDY Freewavs Principal. Arterials (State) 1) Eastern Beltway (State) I) 2) SJt'434 . S..R:' 4 19 ., ,;:, \.'. ...: '. j. Principal Arterials (County) .:....:~:~or,~iii~:i~~~I*ji:~lf),~;~'~,~~i: - . - - -. ROM to EaStCni'BeltWay. . ..:: ' -' .: ;...... . .: .' -.,:_; ! ':;:. ::.. ..,:.::::~..:~.,:.:,...-.,!;_,~...' .~:. :.,":" . .:.~:ld .....:.~:...,. ," ~ ...;'.'~.:.'" ..~.'~.'.~,!",t,'.T.~.:.: " , '.' ~- -. .. :.~,::.:'<'.\./~:'~ ., '..: . . Red B~g Lake Road TuSki~lIa Ro~d;' ",' : . . . · Min'orColleaors (COlmtyl I) 2) 3) Dodd Road Eagle Boulevard Shepard Road - U.S. 17-92 to Wmter Springs City Limit . . , '. '. . -'" . ';";' . ...... ) -'.' ~. ..-f '.: Municioal Collectors (City) I) 2) J) 4) 5) 6) 7) , 8) 9) 10) I I) 12) 13) ,14) . IS) '16) (7) " 18) . .",~k "'::";': , " :. Bahama Road - Shore Road to Hayes Road Dolphin Road - Moss Road to Hayes Road DySon Road - Tuskawilla Road to Shetland A venue Edgemon A venue - Panama Road to "S.R. 4 1 9 Fischer Road - Panama Road to E. Lake Drive Greenbriar Lane - Northern Way to Winter Springs Boulevard Hayes Road - S.R. 434 to Bahama Road Moss Road - S.R. 419 to Panama Road Northem'Way - All 'Panama Road - Shore Road to Edgemon Avenue Shepard Road - Seminols:.County Line to End Sheoah Boulevard - Shepard Road to S.R. 434 Shore Road - Panama Road to End W'mding HoUow Boulevard - S.R. 434 to End Winter Springs Boulevard - TuskawiUa Road to Eastern Beltway TrotWood Boulevard - TuskaWllla Road to Northern Way Tuscora Drive - S.R. 434 to Northern Way Vista-Willa Drive - S.R. 434 to Northern Way ---- ,;.. '" III-9 " . ",", " ,,';:;~,.0.{t~~ . . -- .' ;: ;~.~;~. l~ ,:~,""I"r I~", .... ...~ '- ., . .", ..." ..... 'I"~:' t., ;:' ~ , . :;t I I I. ~. :_ .'l~__ll .-... .' ~~ '. I.~I~ ...... t~ "~ ')} :::~::~:~~.~. .",'1- ~"i.\~'~?, O. . , J t:~~..~., :....:'~.: . . ::1 ff.~~~_';= : :': {~~:~~ :t:" i:dJ 0: . . "\ " '. ,.. ;~~': ~ ~ A~P X scr 0 g ij ~ i ~ ~ ~~h ~ :t ~~..~.. 0 ~si 3" (). . CI ~ - "~~';,~~:~:;~;~~.:"'i;h~~~l:!i!i~;&:;:< - .'~ ..' ".ck....,'. ,', LEGEND; . .': ": . :'1::: :.~: .... JlII.lIIl1 PRIN'CIPAL. ARTERIAL (STATE),: . ~~~._~ URBAN MIN~R"ARTI:RIAt"(C'6UNTY) 1 MAJOR COtiECTOR (COUNTY) -.-.-.- MINOR CO~ECTOR (COUNTY) li MUNICIP AL qOLLECTOR (CITY) NUMBER OF LANES ~ JJm1 ~ N5 m .~ -N- ~ @ N.15. b 0 ~ > ;:) r.l ~ 0 I. (..0 ~ I -- ~ .1 . "a, I ~ '" " s f8 & JOl ~~ -0 ~~~ ~~~ @~e >~C/) ~m(/) ~C/)~ ~ ~ o ~ -< C/) 0' gt-@ 1 ~. , " . :t I'! ::: ~,~~;~Q~~~~t.~~.:~~::::':~;~"'''''''__~~::':l;l...~...,,,,.~'~d''..' "":"I~'" .~ ",._. I ,___,____ i;;, ]::1 , i ::;:i:1~{ /::;::";": '" "1' l' I ' II,',O"~ ;"'i" ,,' l' !Ii~i '!:~f~! ~;-;; '" ;:I]'l~ "'l~~':", ' :~. ~~:i!!j:~: :;;~to;~; , } ~:!1~~:. ~l!#;~,:I' ".' , ' , . '~. ,..,~ II x,,,\ , , '~i :~;~,.";o '~ ::~~:.. f; Li =. :i~,::l i'" a. ~.b3:::11 ~~v~:,:o::t wl ~ ~ '::::" 0 Sl~:~ - -3 ,-'" x 00 . a 8 0 ~ > fi\ ~ ~ (,.< :z: ~ I V! N 0 ;:; I .. ... ~ .... ~' ~i .~~ ~~ ,~~ ~~ )>0 g)> ~~ -< ~~ ~ " ...:.. .' ....' \ .. ."I~'" "":',\ ;.,1",..........'...-;,;... .,,~,~ . '.. .' ~.,' . . . .- .' ..' . _ .-. ,.' __' :~l ......-.. " ';- - -:- , ' " .: : : ':.:.:'. . ~ ~:.. , ,:,t,:: , 'J,:' ,,' t~;::, ' .r*~;', :" ,SCREENU.NES LEGEND: ' .. '.-',!.,;: - ......; ':-~~ ,i'\,- - cc LAKE DR. RED BUG LAKE RD. , I B , ' - ~ =--- ~ -N- ~ N, T,5, ,.... ~ ci U r- ~ ~, ;: vi~;' . ".,.:'"'.',,.' "File Name 1~~;"!:;i~~'~J0,-:"':,;'};jf.._g~o~~PRN '.;;,!;J:,' ;:\j:~r,H;:';~ ,";',' ,,',;' ( HASSIGN WSE ~.~~,:"::",.,~",, '".',' . i",.~.,~,;!;;,~,J~~~,~~y,#.~,~;~:l~,~.: : "".: ....:..,.'.. j ",!~';": . ". l ~ '\t~.'. ,,": '/~~;\,<t,::":,'., ":,~~;{ .., "" ~ = .:-:: ," :....: ....-.:~.. File Name' . ii ':' ,',,', ", tINKSEC.\VSE , ; !,-:.:., ',':':' .[;~;~:~ ::!;-:~I.:;>':'~~':" I,::::.'::;;:~,;~:;'::.:,' GRVTOTEC:PRN ,HASSIGN.WEC I l : ",::' ;:i)::, ,', ....:.. ;, .:.... ~.>' ",: File Name ,. ,",;. L~lO.WSE , ':: c,:':'GRvrOTlO.WSP HAS SIGN. WSP i.~.:'::" . . -.- .... . ", <:.. ,...... ~ :,i~}~:~~l~~"E~tr=[~~~~\{';\'~";:~::" ___ __ _. _'._u._u_u__._u__ --- ----- - -.-_....~..-_.,~,.. _. ::-.: -:..::.r...~':".~~~:~.r:;.i\€~?:~~J,.'."'{:'J'1~~.:.f~;.-7',~.-. - ," Table 10 MODEL V ALIDA nON FILES rrRANPLAN)/(FSUTMS) 'Table 11 E & C FILES ~LAN)/(FSUTMS) " Table 12 2010 FILES (TRANPLAN)/(FSUTMS) -27- Content , 1996 Road Network , "Gravity Model-Input 1996 ASsignment Content 1996 + Committed Road Network Gravity Model-Input 1996 + Committed Assignment - .content 2010 Road Network Gravity Model-Input 2010 Assignment - ''--- ~.~=rr'(~:::r"r,,~:;,~;r;!:~:r~~~~;'~,' "':",:"\'-','~';'" , ',.! .0.,; ,:-""';;~2:~;:. :'~1f.:~~MO~,:,;:~'~?,;:~,,':~~:T~~"=" '" .:- " -", 'J',:i,;%~;:~(;,:JJ~.:>\':i~~: :,<:; ""'::' . ~,'... I, - 5'f' .: it" .''itE~E;i\f.;~'~!.ii,~::~. :,~'ooo: ',", ~".TRAFflC :iioDEL: , , /(OOO)~,~!~:nNGY9.~!JMf: " , , '~"'. ' ','.:,,' ;',fr'~;: ":",' " , ':: "?~';'.;::,:'i;~): '..' '. :\. ',I , ';"i ,... '0, ~ 8 '> ~ 'r,l l' :z: , ~ \.00 Vi .. I ~ '" '0 .... :; '~()() :Do ~~2 ~v-o z~~ 8 ~ n~ 00~ ~<gJ >03 :::1r os;;~ z~ ~rno 0 -< :n 012 ~ "' 11 800 (12,600) LAKE DR. '1 500 (9,472) "~' .~ -N- ~ N.T.S. 16600 (15.300) 800 r-- (1,410) ~ 0: U 6,500 (12.260) r-- Table 13 SCREENLINE COMP ARlSONS 1996 MODEL VALIDATION (Average Daily Traffic) ':,' .,; ,:"",(""",,: ,'.. , " Model ' E&S!!ll Traffic ".Gmm1 ' Percent Validated ".,.....':. ,..~h'rFt,. ." .., ,0, ",1 , , ,', .' "'~,:?~~d (91: :~rtation ta;cilities must be quantified. This is normally done by using forecasts of _ ,:::'i/"':'i'::'''~')fi.rture soci~~oII1ic activity to genera~ future trip making potential. These nips are then assigned i,'>..,:'>.'::,,;:;,,,,'toa netvibrk.,hi'ordet to 'detenIDne the transportlition'facilities necessary to meet these demands. , , .... 25,600 67,600 61;300 25;141' 69,029 ,61,713 1.02 0.98 0.99 , ' ., SOcioecon~mic Forecast,- The basis for 'the forecast of socioeconomic (SE) data for the 1996 Winter Springs TrarisportationStudy outside the City are similar forecasts that are available from QUATS. Seminole Ccmnty also bas base year (1995), and 2001 data by OUATS TAZ. The forecasts for , ,Winter Springs micro-zones were developed by the consultant with the cooperation of the C~f , Winter Springs. , , , ,';::,The,l996,Wmter Springs Transportation Study involved the creation of29 micro-zones within the · .',';:--:'>'::::,<:.ity:-asprevioUslY described. These ~cro-zones permitted the kind of detailed analysis of ,'" ,:' ,'.,:,sOcioeco*?mic growth that is critical to the detailed foreCasts of future traffic that was, required in I' ),:, <:,,;.L~i(Q.i:c!~i;t9.',$lly IDea$ure ~rtationimpacts on municipal c911ector streets. This type'of detailed ' I ,<~:;" ',,:";'),'!fJ~~iysili:,t~~::'a:cCOmpliShed for the' micro-zones within the city and changes to the previously . ",' ..:.....~:::T;:~.:j...'i~' ," .::. ....~>~..:::....:...}; ..... . .' " .' l' ':"':;.&~;'P,.Y,R~~~~;~j~nomicpl;ojecti?ns for,the city resulted. The ,final 20 1 Ofo~ of socioeconomic : .. ,~,;:,i :';~r?t~'4~~W)r:th~ 29 'qiiCfo-Zoo.es within the' city is provided in the Appendix. It is important to underStand . ,';:.',\<;-4~,\~~~.~~}~~r3P.10'ciijproj.ec~on ~ based on current vested projects, approv~d PUDs and growth trends. I' ,,1::-//":)),\,~J\~?~:~?~:assum~ a?igh dens~ty urban center at S.R. 434 and TuscaWllla Road. 201O"SE ~ta for I ' ~ ,.! :.';:; ',:\,;;,,} tlle,:"other, 2:0nes Within the regIon were taken from the 0 U A TS. , :':,j.~,:"iL';;r~~;;;~;:~~~~;"~::'~"':;;'~:J:',:"r-:'',"~:, ':', :: ' ';:;j~,:;}i:~fi2;'iff;hHl~H~~Y 'N~~ork - The 20 I 0 test network was developed by the City in an attempt to I '~tG"1Y*1f'a~8ohUnodate'the: type of2010 development described above and quantified with SE data in the .:'::t:':;;~~;.;/.t{;fAJp,~'~di'~:;,:, This network incorporated all of the programmed improvements from the FOOT and 1::,~;:~:0.~N;tJi1~;~:e:in.{~~I~'-::Co'u~ty as well as modifications to the 2010 Future Traffic Circulation Map (see I :~.~~;~';I~.~~~:i:~~~q!1i~~1~!r~:.:;!:.:~~'::.:.~:1...:..; ::", ----_..-"'.7.-.-_'__"..-.' -'~;~~fl#:; n~.__._. _.__._._ui~t~~rft~:.~i,:... :..:':> :,' -29- ,. _______~.. .-.".:.",":'i.. .' !~~~.\~~i~~:.~1.~i~:'.;::.. I.r,.'\.'\~~..~tt~~'tlt~~~}'~l",,-:,.I.'~'- . _> _. __~ _ .~_______""L,,"--'!:~''-''''''~=-,"'''''''-''''''--~ _""= .;'_'__ . -- --- - ---- " .- . '.-., .... - ---- ~ :".' ;2.'~ ;t):tM\A\i1~r~;~r"~:i1.;~t~t+~~~:;!'~.j :-:;;..~.:. ill m :~:..in commonly accepted traffic engineering practice, . "" ~;/~f.:.?:. .:'. . . , :" , ,'::';,.'i:it~TriD Generation - The attraction and/or production of trips caused by a given [)'pe of land " ., , , , ,..i4'~eveI6pmenr, as documented in the current Institute of Transportation Engineers (lTE) ''Irm , ,', .':,,:,:,-:,/',;;~?~WW0eneration" publiCatio~ 'or as calculated using the computer software "MicrotraDs." ,i:)..,,:,~~\._:,f.;:;:~~'~t@ifr~IJ!!~(~:~,~'_:;;::~~'::rr:~':~'~~';:;~L~':..,~~' ,:' '." ':,':;:'" ': :,: ,," ,.:-",.. ," , "i;,,;"":'..\~'HO'r:!-ii~t~~~<:'i~~J'I<1HIV;IVIVUCIlJI~"':':'1rLllC <1lJjJ1J\.4UUU U.L a..senes,ofmathemaucal formulae, converted to computer ',' ,:,,::"N~;{~i~~~r~~~~q~:'" '~"';}l~},fohh.~::p~se'of~ating trip'generiJ.ti~n; trip'distribution and traffic assignment to'a ;":';;.::\~:~%~i~i",':.., .,\~::",:'~:~,q(~#non'fii.C4i#es.;;,Such,D,1Odels.'Salib~~c;(Ho,r WmterSprings, currently in use by ~~"':~;,~:::~~;,~;::~~j:~A?~\ rW~,~.i~,(H:e.Cotiiio/~':?r bythe,.~lilndo Urban.IA.reaTranspOrt,a~on Study (OUATS), may be acceptable .~:);r::/:( ;..,/:;;~Jf.app.i:Oy'ed for'usejn thel\1.eti1<:>dologyMeeting. :Other~ch models will require documentation of ~~~~~:~. -~. ,,- ., ;; :~i~~.v.;;'i~;,,;j.~i'~~~e~1~:to id~tify,tranSpOifuti6n:relate:d~:iinpactson,th~';roadway that are likely to be generated " " ":;;::\;i~YI a\~ific propoSed devc:lopmentbecitise of tjpe,size~: denSitj, trip generation or location. The : ..')~':: ',~~HN~,ddentify,;;access iriiprovements~', near-site improvements, and on-site improvements. The , , " : :imprQ~einents:pre':'ddinedaS',foiIows: 'I , . I, . " '.~' . " . ,',', r:;~~:;~~:~f: '" ':'.Vf;'~,~~~:.~~>~'{'~.' .' ~.;~ : ':Access ImprovementS " " , 'Road improvementsn~ to provide safe and adequate ingress and egress and , for: efficient operations. Access improvements inClude but are not limited to the following:, . I .:::::" . :;~~'1:-::.1::~'~~~~"; ,,:~:,,:~~}~~~"':" ~..' , ',,' ,:"","": :':JL I i Right-of-way easements; - "- Left an:dright turn lanes; Acceleration and deceleration lanes; , Tnlffi<:'-Control devices, signageand markings; and D1-a..mageaild utilities as they relate to transportation improvements. ", ':",>, ,. ..;,;' ,-"," ',N eat.;site' Iitipi-ove~ents a. b. c. d., e~ .. " I ! 4 ":".2'; :.,\ ':'.,:'. . I "" . '~:4:"::::!'>r:,. <Offfsite or'near-site improvements may be required in addition to igtpact fees to satisfy conclutency requ.irements within the 'primary impact area . . " . t. . . . ," J . " ;.~. ",,', I 3~ ' On-Site Improvements t "", ,;t~Y;:,. "! :;~~ :.:::.~;.~:;;t:: Road,and parkIng improvements located Witbin'the boundaries of the specific parcel " proPosed f~r de~elopment and road'improvements which provide direct access (turn- lane;' tapers; signalization; etc) and:, right-of-way dedication are deemed to be totally the responsibility of the developer and exclusive of the transportation impact fee. ,:On.::site circli'lation: and; parking issues' will also be addressed including traffic I l [Vc9" . :..~:I' .::' : I . . ,.i'(:' " ;. ,:.:~;t ':..r~.'Y' A".Jl.Ai'shall be prepared by,"a quali~:~cl,\"r~ortation Engineer pursuant to an ,acceptable ,~~g:,~etPOdology, o(transportation,pl~i.'~~:~p~eeringprocedures.::~~ is unde~ that the report ":}~(: ~;.p.~an<!l~r:;~mnlendations wou1d-~be':s~~t~r,~y)ifp~fess,ional engin~r. re~eIl:d: iti the'State of , '-: ~i"y...f.~.;tf.l~#~.nbe 'expense:ofpreparing,them,iS~~~be:bome;~lely by th~ OwneqDeveloper. The TIA .:,' :,,:\~ :";~~Xs%:j'~%~:review#.d'for ~cy ~d'cil,~~\~~~~~h~~~;,Pi~i~,represenilitive p~oi::io ,~ptance. ,Cost , .. ,'.: ,:,~, ofi'Sucn'review,shall be borne solely,by:ilie/~erlDev,eloper. " " , ,'", . :.. :': l' ' :.~:!!~~,,,,,,:,,- ' <'" ", , " :,',,' :'., "hil\:~2;:~~~I'+;'~"':::''';I~f ;;;>;j', " . ',;, ' ':.. ,1..,,/ ' ~ ", .~'~f.~~i~,~t~~:JP~~;rIA shall, iriclude,the' fo~p~~i~~~4i:4~~::~~,methodqlogy~ Piicti~,:and principies -r:--.., ' : ",_:::,~:,,:;,:~~,~~j,hri1i;~ih'detefu1inine~ih6!fihrliti~('~ ':I~"''i',i!v~;ff''t';Qbrid~tions:~' i .. :;-';;:?:' .,): 'it:~' ,,:"';J~:.';::'(:"":" ': ~:'.: ' '. " '" :.' '. ,".' ....... ., , '. '\ :i' .'~:.,._"~.~< "",:::'~'~f~:/,:.~..::'; :r;::;'.,;:'~: ~::;.~~~:' ,~.: ~.<" . e. An ailalysis check if ~'lanes~:traffic::signa1s;: or other site related improvements will be " required: at ~ projeCtaci;eS:)'pOints,;~d::rb~.,Twn lane warrants prescrj,bed at the end of '':: ': 'tthis chaPter .m;req~;,Tw;n;;'1.~~~~~;~(Uength of Storage ,lanes shall be b~ed on .-" ca1cUla~ "queue" :.1ength,.and;',$~":,confo~:, ~o FDOT Roadwav and Traffic Design ,,'Standafds'(latested.ition)."',;,I:,;:~_f,~:~~}:.;,',,;i::,:::>"<:',;," ',,' ,. ' :,<> ',':",\P/;{;;!i;~:;/;:;:;'~ .' , . f., '",:Sight~ce'triangl~,shall,~:p~~#4:~~:,ili.~I/ud~onsite,:'plans ~~ re~ewed with this "TIA. Limitation andrestrictions;Witb.i..D:.,;the\sight distance, triangle shall be identified and . . ,~'. I P, " '. ; .' ~, ,'. -' , . . removed if contained on the 'properij,:ot'the applicant. '. . . . ..... ..' .. '."t~lc'<i,',~-: ." :,'::';::'~,Use Lndex Nos. 545 and 546 of FOOTRoadwav and Traffic Design Standards (latest .', ';', '.. ", _ , . "..' .... ,,',... .! r~'''' ..", ,. . ,cditio,!,) o'r:altcmativc approved, by the City,,', >;i,::'HI~5;;",:"",,' ' ' << "Y,;';'2.i,' ,'" (. .... ...;....,.'Xt~i\~:l"::\:d~i;; . . , .,,-:. .'" rn ~ u '"I:, '"I 'I','" '" ,I, :1: I I, I, ' I I' I I I conrrols, pavementmarkings and traffic safery. , I,'. " ~ontent of 11.8.' ~ .' "I! . ....'. ';",1 " '..:': .:: ..1,~'::~r:~t:~.i:~'t'.: '.~~~~i.~, ~-. ~... .:.;. .:;'. J!~::i , i:': "'(1~;;~1;:.~~escriP;~O:,Ofde"el?r~itt;~~1;~h~;{~Mj~rp gen~~n; . c~",::<::,Trip end rates"or:equations.;(t,oi'~5i,~~9}f::~y:ailable) used to generate the traffic, and the ',,' ",' 'source of this information' (Use9ftitlj~i:n:EJ;rrip, Generation Manual, latest edition is required , ,," unless otherwise.app'roveclor,iCq~by'the,city); , ,,',' ' " '..' ": ::,;;;;,!,:;::j( .' , d" Total trips generated f9r,:tJJeAv.e~~e,D,~y.,Trciffic (AD1}and the A.M. -ana..:P.M.-pealc hours. ,(The peak hour for a,dja~e~~;s~ettraffic'~' usually the most appropriate peak hour : to use); :: :,:~'" , r', ,. Q tl ~ DA Requirements for Dcvd.Q.Illnru~h 300 or More New' Daily TriI2S. - In addition to the information listed above for projects generating less than 300 new trips. the following shall be provided: .,'. . ..,. . . I ." Ij":, :~: : .1' -,~. " I ~ :. .,~ . j :,~i: . :- .. .:' :~':' 'r.: ",; :. (~I:, .;; . . I , Existing'Conditi6Iis: ' ",::' ""'C" ,"'i~":' :",,/:~>,:': , , ' 'f~'~!:~;;", ",.i,:' ;"O,{, ' ';::: ,.;;;':::,": ,~:! . ,,>~r/.::'::-, !;:;i~;\!':i:~1;:: ::--', ' ' ..','. ,',', " "a.' '):~:q~neral:'Slt~~' Desanption~,~<'A" d~~ied: 'd~Criptt~~;;;oi, the proposecFdevelopment , ,--:-'i:;," ::; 1"~CludiDg)Sit,~:loca~6n. type 'df deveI6p'men~'~proj~!~nstiuction completion date .. ' ::/?'~,d<phaSUi'g;~':Tllls'sectio'ri ;sball$p"::pro''0de''~ d(#,cnptiPil of ,the roadway network , . '. . .',..,..... .. " ..'. . .~, "f r' ,'. . . . . for"the areaimdei-study,.:right-of~WaY aIjd' pavem'eil~::yvidtliS,sigruu: locations and .... ....... :. '.;/<;ic;, c;'j'f':il~~;r~~,t;i(\\i"~!R;f~i:\', ;,:;;~;~:;~;~~)~;ii~~I,":;~;{1;i").'~;'_:" . . :, , "...b.<~;:~"!'oi.':l'.",:.,,'I'b~~Er~'h,:','...~'.~yl!f:S't.aiiilifrdS~'iliiktAlt"":.>:"r)J'~liIii"'dtailed dii". f th ~~ . '" , "'::'subject,~:the'eXiSrli:tg::'average::~yt:riiffic~:and?,~';hour:t:iaffic volumes shall be '" reported;""#l.tJ; roadway iii.1k:3nai'~~~and~":~teri~~,6M:iilialysis' provided. The peak . 1 ') hour of the\generatol' (devdO:pmerityshouldH>.c::proYided' as;itrelates both to the AM. :.....:',.:.:,:,:,.:_; ;".~ ,..:o!t,\'':'', ...:..... " , :":':~..:'.. 'I"..~I~.. ,:'::"~.'..;...."t:W..<'.:'" ":i.t,~';.'~")a;J;"':", '.,': . '. "'. ".. """'I~aff.d'~~Jvn~rpeaKhoUr' of'the7;:adj~~ent:;sui#tS~...<n@~~~Cussion showdoccur at the m~thodol()gy ri1ee~g alJ,4 ~'agre~d,peak,hour(sj:~eten;nined for the TIA. , :'i;' .'/);\:,;'<::,'" ':;\, '.-;:;': '" ,',:'t:..::j:; , Program.irte~ Improvements, -,::Th~ analysisshau,':: indicate any programmed transpo$t:lon improverpentS' ftuj.4ed,'for th~ priinary:impactarea. A,programmed improvement is one that hasbeen'funded'an.d is contained in a,work fJtogram:-The" , analysis s~ll indicate what program improvei{j,e~ts)U'e assumed in the analysis. Programm~d improvements e'xpect~, to b~ und~~~ontract more than three (J) years . ',followlng','theCertificate"ofOccUpancy;,ofthifde:;,dopment shall not be used to , detennine concurrency, " ':: ',:":: ":,i:'" , '1. 1 1,- I I I , , ",' I. d. I I '.....:.... . ~ '.1.' . , "';'~,', J I I I I " ' Stateme'nt of pfoject Trijl Generation:' CJuira-c,eijstics'-,Thisl,;shail' indicate the' project's. trip generation characteristics mtermSof daily and pe:31(.hour.g~ne~o~{, Fllli documentation shall be 'providedifth~;trip generation rate utiliZ~d-is: otiier;:thari',tba(sb~Wiliin,the' most regent ITE Trip G~neration ManuaL' Stith' docuinentatio~ shjiif'b,6 p~o,vided"~t'::Aie ,illethodology" meeting and' , subsequently approved by the City prior to Use. , ~pycialtJ:1p gene~tiO,~~.studies may b~ appropriate; however, specific procedur-es.' number of studies ~IJ&loCa!ion sliall bdteviewed 3?d cpncurred in by the City. ' ' ' ,. " ".; I ,.' .l ..' ;,; ',' ,!.,.... .t' .....,..' Stateinen't oj Background Traffi~ - Thearialy~i~~,shall,. iiidude~acJcwoUnd traffic on the adjacent roadway network, This shall include ct.irrent traffic .c,ounts as well'as projection of this base line traffic to the occupancy date and/or concL!lj'ency, date. All such growth factors require documentation and justification, The)" shoul(be;"discussed and agreed on at the Methodology ,..... .';:1 ft [V~J!: ' ,. ~ . .:,,-.);,t':'i~~~t~!" ',I', . :..:.:'.' 2] fJ ~ Mecli~g. I, Statemenl oJTrip DislTibution and Assignment ~ The TIA shall provide projected trip distribution with appropriate justification, and docume,ntation. ".The: distribution of.. traffic" approaching the development shall either be based on demographic "?ata.., currellt: turning movements in, the area., or "gravity modeL" The proceq~ to' ~,,:~clud.~;i;~~0~,~;;~9;: :~~~li~~~,cl<?~~ented in the Methodology Meeting. The project traffic':~luilli~;sho~ a:nd:,~~Ix.>~Cd,over;l;he,:background volumes with totals indicated in, map and/ortabl~}format~' ADT 'and pe~f.ho\tt are reqUired on all links ,~ .f.:.!......' ...iit:l.' ':'fJ;)'r'~)~.< .......: ~.".::f,...~~~,,(:I..II'!.'.;J;.:~-l.J'":. ........ /,," . ": -, . .' ;:'Y( '" . " "":~~.~'I::";' . '; !.1~,1~~t~~ . .__'~: ';':~:". (:.\~i'i;,':~~f1'*'~~~~';Jf}~}~~'I:.t:.,( ,,1':: d~:': ;.j;~.:: . .' . TrafficlmpacI.Ana(ysu- All a~~\yses ~~;~j>e~i~~;~~.~i;~~~t~~~.#~dnveway I' ' , ";.,, ",..':,'., ',' :,' ..': analyses tummg, movements:~Wilt;-,bei' reniliri:d~'for~,a<1.0S;i:3.Ii.al~~.Hi&AwaX,;:r~n:lr.lty"nianua1" ,i;, :':,' :,::,~,> ',,'~:: ,}, , :;' ,:', .",':"'''(~\)\lf;;'i:;)~'',,/:,,'.',<f~p~r,:t:i~,:'::~t~4.\!''':'','il~,,~~~~tt~I~~~,~,:~~v.~:~,: ,:,',,' '. "~::' "..,'~~,~~ff.:;,~:~:>,,,~iy,59~(Hcs.f,~f; ~ya!~q~',~9(~h~lt?l!e!~W~cMR~~~5~2-~~P!ili1)CA:~sf9~ffi~~~C)n,., <~:,:~, , ,,' ,',. ,,'and'diivewa aCCeSs futS.,:Lfuk~' .l{'~silalloe~-fifoifu&i'-usiD",so~~vanable~frOm,FDOT '-,:: I atid;:descri~, in Fl:rida'sLi;veF ~~~k:::sblWdfu1i~i:;'~dxclid~liri~/Mim@'/f6t,;'Planning. ':, Driveway accesspoints~'~U:~:,~~g~,~k~{~i;t4~~~f~~~;~~~li:;'~:,~wited for,' the Levels of Service indicated' in the' triu:fi;c:'elei#~nt,of' ilie':;'~i.tYs: cq;iilp~~DSlyc:\PI~ri'::'Criticiu ' intersections to be analyzed shali' be ,~, to~'~'ili,;;, Methbd9.i9gyj,'Me~~g~:;At~~;:~'jrijmum, all signalized interse,ctions in the primary impact ,~;'shau:bC: ~Q~i~:)~S,3ddition. a roadWay link analysis using the FDOT software $ba1l~Ae.yeIQ~.f~i,~:,~pa,C#4i:(m<?~~ 3q~~Yf'~ hour, . ,.', " ..1~1.~.',~ '~.~.:....,.. .'......:......"..1...;.....:-.... ...t~..,.;!......l_...,..'.,;.,.............,... . tnps) roadways shown in the City'sComprehensive:,p1an:and located, WIthin the'p~n:i1pactarea. , .' , ," I I. - I I I . . ~~';" .,' -' . ,. :.' . -' . .. ~ . Tables and figures shall include but not be1imiti:<i to,lhe, f<?llo\\'ing:,', TABLES I .' ......~ .._;'~"-" 1. Proposed LandUse'~y pluise, TyPe midSiZe;', Passerby and/or Diverted Traffic ~ercentages by Phase and Laiici Use; I 2. I 3. Daily Trip Generation byPh3se, Land Use, ~d Size with New Trips and ,. " ..-, PasserbylDiverted Trips Separated; , ' ' I I I 4. , ' Peak Hour Trip Generation in ~e Same Catego~es as Daily Trip Generation; and ' " , :: :", ,';" ' " , 5. , ' ' .. '. .' . .' . .'.' '. :,,: f':. ...~';, ;. " ..'. Trip Distribution - Percentages .Approaching ,the Site by Dire,ttion. , ' ,. . FIGURES '. ",;,'::f:~':"'" 1. Vicinity Map Sbowmg Si'te: ! 2, Existing Traffic Counts by Lin,J< (ADT and' Peak Hour): . ,', ':" :" R ~:-};\ ~ /!~~~~rBlfD':"""", ..... rn ~ m ,II I . .' . - !! " :!! " , jii I II I I I I I I I I I H ~ J, Posl-Developmenl Peak Hour Traffic,(Twning Movements) - Project and Tow Traffic Separated;" ;:';:" , 4, ,. 'I',' Post-Development Daily TraffiC;"3pd'i~:J:': . . ;';.' ...' ", .' . .' . " . . . ..' '. .;. \ .~. .. . .' :.". ." . . " ,.:~., '( : :;"':"~",,,, ",: ,.." .' ,', :;.,,' '.' "':, . . . ,>'." ' 5.' ReconiIp~I?ded Impr.Oy'erri~~/s,,~~i~~~,Ii.~~:an~:dF~ iI;ttiible forIDilt, or ,,';;si=:d:~l ~::t:)~do~~~~~;~;?i~t~s;~~~,~i~~c~~~~t,~'-~'R;~S:$j .' .i"': ":!',.: . ,"';- .:.. ,,' . -I .' .....:... .,..... .;.'X . ',improvementS (three years) may not be syfijc'i,entJ9actoID.ihdd~te the traffic iDipa&'ciftheproject, , , thus violating concurrency'reqwrements contiirici:f. in the:Cotnpreherisiy~:Plari. It:Wili'~'eD:cuIDbent ' upon the applicant to ide'ntify'Such interseC~oilS,'~d'liri,ks o(tlle roa4way,~Stem~here Level' of , Servlce standards will be violated at project bUildoti~ or where, iIriprov~ments are planned three years from the occupancy date of the development' 'It isUrider'StOOdtHal: in thosedeveloprilen'ts-whiclnir'e' . not to be occupied within'one year. growth ofbackgroundtTatf1cbefore Levels ofSemce are tested is required. :'...' .'1 '. ,. .,.. . ~ :., ! .' ;.i.'..:. ,......: , rv-IJ ,. . ,; :.' '~:;.:,;";~:,.;~};;:i~)H:;\~, ' . .:.,. . .:':\:'.': ~:\ :, \::}t.~;\M;~I~: , " ~ 8 I I I J I I I I I I J 1 I I f I : 1 Table 16 CITY 2010 ROAD NEEDS CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS FUNDING , ':1 ~ . ~~;~.'~ Phase I . ....J~~ ,', .,:;j+: The following improvements should be undert3ken' by the City at the earliesfpOssible &:t'e':' ,:;';" .,,': :~:;~.;, .... . '.'~f .'-:/ 1. Improve Panama Road from Moss Road to, Edgemon'Avenue. '," , '" "",fi-J:,,. '.." ..', ',',', '.- "'r,c' "" '",'.,,',.: '..,' :"'.";Sl'~l~:' " Improv~ Hay~ ROad noFlh of Bahama ROOd to exiswigpavh1g~nHayeS: ,',,:~'~~~':~:,":;~~ Improve Moss Road from Panama Road north to eXisting p~vingon ivfossR.o'ad~r::'::, ',:,~';t!." ,,"',:' ,;,,":- '," ,,' ,.-" ::,: <<,, .,: ,,'..,:;..;1i,\1 "'::.."':"}f~' ,..', ";"'~ ' ";::,,:'.: ..:,:2;,:'..:::,'.. 3. 4. Replace Hayes Road bridge. :.:.:...~~~t. . : ;:~. '5. ' Replace Moss Road bridge. '. .~..... ..:: ~\./~~ Phase IT , , , , , ' 1. Paving and drainage improvements to B8hama Road from Shore Ro~d to 'Hayes Road~ 2. Paving and drainage improvements to Panama Road from'Shore Road to Moss Road. - '--- 3. Paving and drainage improvements to Fisher Road from Panama Road to City Limits. 4. Add stacking lanes to Hayes Road at the S.R. 434 intersection. Phase III ,. 1. Upgrade Moss Road !Tom S.R. 434 to S.R. 419 from two lanes to four lanes. .....j;. Phase IV . .:. :~: 1. Improve Winter Springs Boulevard to three lane capability from Northern Way to N~rthem Wa)C-(east section). This will be accomplished by 'adding turn lanes at each intersection for both traffic flow directions. , ;.'/.;.-, : ",' 111-)7 -..:" . r.," ".";. .....1.: . : .::,:~.:' u ~ I I ,I I I I I I I I I I, I I I I , Table 16 (Continued) New Traffic Sie-na1s The following traffic signals on major intersections should be installed when warranted by' using ITE standards. Signals shall be constructed using County mast arm standards: " L 2. 3.,' 4. S.R. 434 & Tuscora Drive S.R. 434 & Vista ,Willa Drive , , S.R. 4.l9 & Edgemon A Y~IlUe S.R. 419 & Moss Road : ", ..; '. ": . ~ ~., The following traffic signals on minor intersections should be installed when warranted. by using ITE standards. Signals shall be constructed using Seminole County mast arm standards: ' .1. , 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. . Moss Road & Dolphin Winter Springs Boulevard & Northern Way (westernmost) Northern Way & Shetland Avenue Northern Way & T~cora Dri,-:e Northern Way & Vista Willa Drive, Trotwood Boulevard & Northern Way Edgemon Avenue & Shepard Road Winter Springs Boulevard & Northern Way (easternmost) " ,.. 1I1-38 - ''--- , fu 1985, the Florida Legislature adopted the "Growth Management Act."'crlori#,~ta~t~;, Chp~ 163) ':to;provide'a framework for local governments to,use'as they develop'or:,~odif}qbeirloi1g-range Comprehensive Plans. One of the maj()r provisions of this Act required local.g~vemmei1t;;to insure ,: ithat the public facilities, and services. that ~ necessary to support de~~~9l?~C?:ntj ,~;'availabie !:',: :,,::\;,,,: , '. :' '''concuirent" with the impacts of development. This means tQ2t all new;.development must be ',..,' :1~ ~ >.'.; .. ..:~:~.:;~.~;~i,~:~~(i~~:'~~"~'~:":.':;'"..":~'i ~:I~~'.,. . '_ :.r-:~~~~,)~~'~:.l~ As of this date, the City ofWmter Springs has not,momtored traffic. impa~~$Di:~eitdeY~lopment :; ;+;<.~ since'~option of the comprehensive,Plan; thus, approved (vested}develoPIllent',traffie'I.nay,or may' ,,':<':.":~ not be Under the Level of Service (LOS) threshold ,established' in the 'Comprehbisiye;Pfan. To dete~e whether existing and ~~mmitted.. (fund,ed,;"Jor': C()nstruc;tio~~~;~t~}nl\~:: y~) ; , , .' :> transportation facilities e<m... accommodate existing arid approved' developm:ent/ a' compansonof' existing and committed traffic to ad.opt~ roa~way capacities, was acC()mplishe<l 'Smee traffic studies have not been required for new development; it, was' necessary' tCli-siniulate' this vested (committed) traffic using traffic models calibrated for the City of Wmter.,Sprmgs (ChapteT ITI). These models reqt.rire socioeconomic data by traffic zone for the existiDgjJlu.s'Comnlltted (E+C) development 1bis data was developed by the Consultant from data provided by the City (see'""'Fable '-' '-' 17), and the application of the model resulted in an assignment of E+C trcl.ffic to the system of arterial and collector roads in the Winter Springs Area. ~ ~ CHAPTER rv ..I CONCURRENCYPL~G . .,' : !'.~J'" '). :. 'Il " '. '- '.- - '. I I I I, I :.:::J:' ' AVAILABLE CAPACITY .....,. ,. ,Since the traffic model results are in Average Daily Traffic (AD1)~ dailycapacity:y.ras usecl for this analysis. Peak hour traffic must be used in intersection analysis and for traffic'.unpact studies (see 'following section). Where capacity is not available using ADT val~, the applicant must: sb<>,Y' that , . peak hour traffic generated by the development will not cause any roadway link odnterSeCtion to 'exceed the LOS provided for in the Comprehensive Plan (LOS D). '" ':, . I I I I, Table 18 shows the status of each link in the City of Winter Springs as of the end of 1996. Those links showing~ negative " Available Capacity" will require wideoing before ~ditioM.l de~elopment traffic can be accommodated. In some instances, it may be 'pOssible,:to:;,'accomin~~te the development using a peak hour analysis which must be performed by the a'pplicant. AnT traffic J( ~ [V-I ! <.4 ..:....... ; ,~, ':~. ',: . <i;~ t.\/~ ~ w I I ',I J I I I I I I I I, I I I I ~ values shown in Table 18 may be converting to peak hour using factOrs developed by FOOT' in their derivation of LOS 0 Capaciry, The information in Table 18 (as updated) may be given to development applicants. It is understood that as developments are approved., the table should be updated by adding traffic (ADl) obtained from a Traffic Study Report The table should be fully updated every two (2) years withncw traffic, ,cowlts and E+C traffic either from the model or manually by deleting that portion of each project's':', ' traffic that is builtout ., TRAFFIC IMP ACT REPORTS FOR CONCURRENCY AND MITIGA nON : j .: ," ,..:.;:",:!; ": :~~;.;'..~:;:, . ",', .... " , . It is the intent of the City Cominission to responsibly monitor growth and development iIJorder to!1:A< _<":"';<~~ that ade:quate public facilities are in-place to' se:venew development, anctthat suc~,facilitiesii;'i,k;. , : ,perfo.mi at adopted levels of semce so, defined in the city,s Comprehensive Plan. ',:2,: ,,. , " ' ~f~J)}: .~: .;':~~' ....t'.: :';:'5;~~~~ ',:':!;(J.{' . ~:.~...;..~ ,'-. ",I. . " ",": . " ~'::-:: ':':I:~'~\ '.".I..~~ . , 'In order to assess and monitor the impact of new development and comply with cO~currency,::,~~':::i. requirements. a Traffic Impact Analysis (ITA) is required for all new 'developmen~: with 'the':<:"'.' exception of that provided by ordinance. The TIA Will be used to d~termine the extent ofsi~e related ", traffic improvements. mitigation for off-site improvements, and will be used as the basis for" concurrency det~rminations. ;. " :.:. .', ' For proposed developmen~lliat will ~dd 300 or mpre new Average Daily Traffic (ADl) to adjacent' ' road,s. the TIA will provide a comprehensive' aSsessment of the development's impact on the ' surrounding road system. For proposed developments that will add lesS than 300 new ADT~' the TIA shall provide information regarding the development's impact on access points onto the adjacent street system. ... ____ ,All developments with more than 300 ADT ("New Trips") shall be required to demonstrate that the additional vehicle trips generated by such development would not cause any road segment or interSection within the distances showll' in Table 1 (primary impact area) to exceed the: Levels of Service (LOS) as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and under Objective D given in Chapter ill. ~ ..- The primary impact area shall be determined by drawing a circle with a center point at the centerline,~.. ' of each development's access point(s), using the appropriate radius as provided in Table 1 based on ", ,', "the estimated "New" ADT. Any arterial or collector intersec~on that is cap~ed within, the p~) ;.- 'impact area must be evaluated and shall be the starting point for a road segment that muSt atso be' ' ," evaluated; except that any intersection which cannot be reached by normal driving practices on a"",' paved access from the development's access point may be excluded from the evaluation. . ~.',.' :. . ~ I Florida's Level of Service Standards and Guidelines Manual for Plannine, FOOT 1995 (or as updated), See Table E-I, IV-2 . .... ,.. . ,'~ ":. '::..: 'l;:~::;~,~l:'~'';':;;;::''' _ _ _ __. ~....... ....... ....- .... __ .... ..... i~ ... rmm ~ c:::1!!1 TABLE 17 .' , ~ < I '-' Oetober 1996 City oJ Winter Springs Existing Plus Committe? Socioeconomics Data Seminole Subzone Existing Exlst,lng Existing Existing Existing Total School School County Single Multl.Famlly Industrial Commercial Service Employment Enrollment Enrollment Traffic Zone Famllv DU DU Employment Employment Emplovment K.8 9.'12 ,I " I; 70 71 0 0 0 0 Or 0 0 776 60 0- 0 0 0 0 0 72 72 113 0 0 0 0" 0 0 " . ..... 778 468 0 0 0 15,> ' , '1,~::, 0 82 82 1371 0 0 9 30 ' , , 39" , 0 545 0 0 ./ ; , 104 0 104 0 83 83 '\ 780 127 0 10 0 10 ' 20 0 781 1005 0 0 30 0".. 30 ' 0 ' , 782 129 0 0 0 0 0 0 84 84 92 0 72 0 57 139 0 783 243 460 166 10 54 \ 230 2458 85 85 0 0 0 28 0 26 0 86 86 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 785 25 0 o '. 54 0 54 , 0 2715 87 87 260 0 o ' 6 72 ,78,,' 0 786 473 0 0 0 0 0 0 787 557 0 0 0 0 0 0 88 88 130 0 0 0 11 :" ,', 11 0 788 498 0 0 0 0" 0 0 789 103 0 0 0 0 0 0 89 89 170 0 0 3 8 11 0 90 90 370 0 0 11 55': ' 86 0 790 447 - 32 0 40 0':, , ' 40 0 791 349 157 0 0 :,O,~(:-'<' 0, ,0 91 91 962 40 0 96 0, ~,:':,>,',c ' 95', 1280 92 92 633 392 6 124 369: :' 499 0 93 93 2, 0 412 8 '27),.' , 447 0 94 94 461 622 1340 531 , :,566"',, 2439 815 95 95 350 1066 110 227 457 794 0 TOTALS: " 9946 i 2769 I 2116 1281 ,1733,', . 5157, .. 4553 2715 f .... ". . "':: ; ~, : l': ,I ~ I I. L ~rt'''f'''''t a I ~f""',' j . .'" " 0, " ,', ' " , f~I:" . . ,.,. ~~. I,~> ~ .... - - - - .-.r -- -- .... - ... II~ 11... IBIIII I.ml ~ ~ ',1" .., {t,~} :(~j?" .., ~. ,::~~5': :'!'.~"" TABLE 18 :\:(100) Jt~~Ei;~l~ WINTER SPRINOS, t,', " E + C SYSTEM CAPAGITY ANALYSIS .t::;, ' ,t;,lj" '..' , (A VERAOE DAILY TRAFFIC) ,f~,'::;' . "~~~~ll~~b~~6\V AY , , FROM TO NO. OF ROADWAY LOS D 1996 199,~'-,', E loe, NEW AVAILABLE TRI?S LANES CLASS DAILY COUNT COMMIITED TRAFFIC TRIPS CAPACITY THIS (E & Cl CAPACITY . (El ~RAFFIC SINCE PROJECT .. (Cl 1996 ,U S, 17.92 S,R. ~3. J SHEPARD RD. 0 ARTERIAL ~7,500 38,123 -4,27J .0,30-4 7.100 ;: U,S, \7.92 SHEPARD RD. C.R. -410 ARTERIAL 31.100 38,123 -4,Ol~ .0,133 .0.035 .. .":." S R, O. U.S. 17.92 C.R. -419 4 ARTERIAL 31,100 2-4,8-42 3,908'- " 28,890' 2,210 S R III C.R.HO TUSKAWlLLA RD ARTERIAL 31, log 2-4.752 5,500 30,2U 8H ..- S R, 01 TUSKAWlLLA RD EASTERN BEL TwA Y '1 ARTERIAL 31,100 18,552 7,478 2.,030 7.070 .. , 18,~0-4 S,R, (\; U,S, 17-02 EoQEMON AVE. 2 ARTERIAL 1~,300 15,553 , 2!5-4t:",;' 3,702 ....:. S,R, (19 EDGEMON AVE. S.R. -43-4 2 ARTERIAL 1-4,300 12,271 1,274 :' 13,545 755 .... . "":"':..'. .-::..{1'::- -.:.... , :.....,. E. LAKE DRIVE SEMINOLA BLVD FISHER ROAD' COLLECTOR ,?2.000 12,817 II 598": ':', 19,2.13 " 3.387 . ~ :. ,:,;"."'.;::' ::'~ E. LAKE ORNE FISHER ROAD TUSKAWlLLA RD. COLLECTOR 22.800 9,~72 8,8211':, 18,208 8.302 , , ." " TUS~WILLA RD. REO BUG LK RO EAGLE BLVD. ARTERIAL 31.000 25,398 11,400 38.703 .5..03 TU5I<.AWILLA RD. EAGLE BLVD. E, LAKE DRivE ARTERIAL 3i,I00 2-4,573 10,470 35,C43 ~,OO TUSI<.AWlll.,l. RD, E, LAKE DRNE WINTER SPGS. BLVD ARTERIAL 31,100 16,572 5,ISC 21,7511 0,2(( lU5}(.AWllLA RD, WINTER SPGS BLVD TROlWOOD BLVD ARTERIAL 31,100 18.071 2.37-4 18.~41 \ 2,55~ iUSK.AWILLA RD, TROlWOOD BLVD. S.R. -43-4 ARTERIAL 31.100 12,058 2.2110 14,327 18.873 SIIEPARD RD, U,S. 17.02 SHEOAH BLVD, COLLECTOR 10,200 3,081 80 3.1-41 7.059 51I:OAH OLVD, SHEPARD RD. S.R. ~H COLLE90R 10.200 5,831 1,080," ' 8.P.' 3.25Q BAtv..a.V. ROAD HAYES ROAD WINDING HOllOW COLLECTOR 10,200 Dirt NlA Bl- f 1.\055 ROAD PAHAJ..V, ROAD DOLPHIN ROAD 2 COLLJCTOR 10.200 Dirt NlA MOS S ROAD OOLPHIN ROAD S.R. ~3~ 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 .,707 1I0e 5.315 '.~~5 " IV.4 ~~'I j, I i! I I btc :I:.,i~ "L 1~....H.:"I!"~l:." "...,,, " I ~,~~i,~ ~:~, .~~~.~:'~.: .i1" ~lIl.~ ....t. .... , ,. J,.....i. .i.. ~.. .~. -~ " t-. ~ -- , ...... >~ ~:i y~ '.",:; , ,::~ i '.':.,. .~:~: i ., ....."::. ".:'. :' FROM , ,TO '..' .. /.\OSS ROAD S.R..~ C.R. .,g rIO;l.THERNWAY TROlWOOD BLVD TUSCORA OR. NORTH:RN WAY TUSCORA OR, VlSTAVILLA OR, '\ /lOllTHERN WAY TROlWOOD BLVD WINTER SPO BLVD.S NORTHERN'WAY WINTER SPG, BLVD SHETLAND AVENUE NORTHERN WAY GREENBRIAR LN. WINTER SPRG BLVD iRon'/OOD BLVD TUSKAWlLLA RD. NORTHERN WAY ,'w-liER SPG BLVD TUSKAWILLA RD. NORTHERN WAY WIIHER SPC BLVD NORTHERN WAY GREENBRIAR LN, \'/IIHEil SPC BLVD NORTHERN WAY NORTHERN WAY wlIHER SPC BLVD NORTHERN WAY S.R, .2& PAIIAI..... ROAD EDGEMON AVE, MOSS ROAD PAllA).'.... ROAD MOSS ROAD SHORE ROAD Il.a.YES flOAD BAJ-WM ROAD DOLPHIN ROAD ILAYES ROAD DOLPHIN ROAD S.R. .3. DOLPHIN ROAD MOSS ROAD KAYES ROAD F ISH-ER ROAD EAST LAKE ORNE PANAMA ROAD " -- ...... '. . ..:. ..~',... .of...: ..~'1;""...,.~... .....1.;,. ;.I~ll',,, .~. ..... " "-"C ..... TABLE 18 " ' WINTER SPRINGS ;", E + C SYSTEM CAPACllY AN,AL YSIS (AVERAGE CAlLY TRAF~lG) ..... . " NO:OF L, ROADWAY LOSD' ',1996'" LANES CLASS DAILY-: .' COUNT:" (E &. C) CAPACITY ' "(E).' COLLECTOR 22,&QO .2,m 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 2,500 2 COLLECTOR 10,~00 2,500 / , 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 1,8&8 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 2,736 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 l,gg, 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 .,121 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 7,38. 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 6,Ogg 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 7,28. COLLECTOR 22,&00 12,260 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 DIRT 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 DIRT 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 DIRT 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 3,3&1 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 2., r 2 C~LLECTOR 10,200 1,2&7 IV.S -~ ~ . : '.': . . :~. . : .,.' ;.'. '.:... .. .... .i~(':'~ ....' '. /: :::~~,:::,:;:~,: C2~~!:'::'" , , coMMlTTED TRAFFIC' (C) , f',r, 8~ go<> I~g 1',572 530 , gO& 2,..8 1,228, .30 301' NIA NJA NJA, .60 35 218 .....;0:..,. ....... -.....ii~J.;.. :.,.L :... . ';1'" . ~ ,- .' :~:' '..,. .". , ,';';,:'(2013).'. '.;. .., ." ..... :'.:~-<~.:i'. '~'. :..:;;":.:....- E &,'C,7,..;,:/NEW: '.':, 'TRAFF1C',";-';"TRIPS ,." '" ,', -:I' '~~" ,,':~ SINCE'" , '. ' h 1996 .,020, 2,58. 3,.Q9 l.gg7 .,3C-1 2,521 5,027 Q,832 7,324 7,71. 12,581 38. 27& 1,.85 am! ~ t::::?:ZJ AVAILABLE CAPACITY TRIPS THIS PROJEC i I &.~&O 7.0 \ 0 , 0.800 e.20) ~,8n 7.6H ~. \]) )58 2.870 2.H5 \O,O)Q O,:l ~Q Q.;2 ~ 8.7 I ~ I : II II: "till" ,:,-*:':',1111111I1, ' ,.. .' ,'-':", ;'~'~ . " .' ~~( r , ';!;I I ','r~111 \ , ' ...' ',' . ~ '~', .:~. .'.:". ,. '~..: ~ """;". . '.~# .r. '" ,~, ,," ::k;... ':, . ....'...~' ..-' -,: ." .-. '..- " ...... , ',COMMIJTEO TRAFFIC ',(C) , -- ~t . . (:. 1111. .... , "TAeLE 18' , :~_::: WINTER 'SPRINGS,' , .'E + C SYSTEM GAPACIlYANAL YSIS. (AVERAGE DAILYTRAFFIG) " FROM ! ..... ,', , , TO NO:OF ROAOWAY LOS O' LANES CLASS DAILY (E & C) CAPACllY .:f:::.:. ,1996 COUNT' (E) .IIII~ ::,II~ I II. ' :;~ . . .:...- ..... li;~ I ~ita rmm eE T" IP S HilS PROJE C T SHOR~ ROAD ?ANM'-A ROAD END E.:.GlE RIDGE RO, BAHMV. ROAD S.R. ~~~ \ lUSCORA DRIVE NORTHERN WAY S.R. ~3--I , VIS T AWllLA OR, NORTHERN WAY S.R. ~~~ 2 GR~ENeR\.AR IN. NORTHERN WAY WlNTER SPRO BLVD, 2 ,OrSON OR, TUSCAWlLLA RD, SHETLAND AVE. 2 SHE llANO AVE, DYSON DRIVE NORTHERN WAY 2 ~OG~I.\ON AVE, E. LAXE ORIVE MOSS ROAD 2 EDGEMON AVE, SHEPARO ROAD S.R, ~,; 2 " .", 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 ~25 COLLECTOR 10,200 NOT OPEN " COLLECTOR 10,200 7&5 COLLECTOR 10.200 1,~10 COLLECTOR 10,200 ,I,Hl COLLECTOR 10,200' ~,2&2 COLLECTOR 10,200 ~,~H COLLECTOR 10,200 2,m COLLECTOR 10,200 2,HO 2 2 r f IV.6 .. ..... ~}r;.;. \l~~'~:~:,,(~':;r 3) 'E:~r~,::~"',' N,EW TRAFFI~',; TRIPS ,SINCE , ,1995 AVAILABLE CAPACITY 170 ' 5;5 , 0,505 " , 2,127 2,8';2 7,JOa " ...;-, - .' 1H 1,5a~' 0,010 -" 20', 1.181' Q.O)O 281 ~,5~~ a.6~7 125 ~,5;; 5,80\ ~; 2,82J 7,377 J85 2,8~5 7)55 ~ ,g ,:..1':' TABLE 19 .:..... 1-,' . . ': ~ :.'.<:t} ,,' ,PRllvlARY IMP ACT'AREA (RADIUS) '-<::~:(.l .;~:.,;.; . . Y:2-mile I'mile 2 miles , J miles '1'-' .. . ..',.; -... " }t~~\):jd;'::ii~;;~B~ ',i: '!" ; . "'.~ , " " I I '- '-:-- ,!! . : ~l\';:~'::~ .: ~.:):j!:::ii~~\t~~~-;:~~~;:~::;::;~~2: , :.: ~~ :-\~:~.~ ; . .F~iJ~~~:~{;'f"'~',!::' ;. ~ ..~.. . -;. ,1. ii ... ,. ~. ~ . -. . . . .;':~'.~/(Ji':,~'" , , -. ..." . ::;:~;J;I~i~i~;~~:'~':;', ..... .' . . '.. :~::)\;--;~{i:":;':Fi{/}!~%\U,~T~ta1 and "PaSser-by" trips to be determined from the latest edition of Trip Generation, - ,/:::;:~~}!{~~{{~f~.~#:~t~t:qfTransportation Engineers or " M,icro trans " software (Equations if available). "New C >;,}~\jt;I~l1ir~(~~~~:~~;::~~~~~:s ~~:~~:~-~~:. :~~ting use (parcel must be occupied within ~~ '--~'~~:;;f~i~l~,~r~r ";~3':';' IV - 7 _ . '- ..-~~~ -~.~l\;:'-~-=:ii" - - ...- ~~!:''''~i;fl'"i:n-;' . C.~..!'I.'.~~'~~~h~"~.... '-,-,:_~' ,,:t~'!"...~:?A~~_'" _.,_~_":,,.:=..=..:~,--''::::__=--C,-'''~~~!'!':~_:'~!!..'"_''!:!~~~-'-'_~~~_::-_...::'..'. . -- - .-- ----- --- --- --- ----- - --- ---- - ------ - __ ______..__.__ ___ _.___.n__'_._U._d__U. .~... ..' ".- _ _. _.=~~~:~~-=~~:~~::::~~~~::-~~:~.~:-~'_o_~_'.-~:~}:,l:\ ~-~'i ....: :: -...:_....::.~ ~_~~~~ ":'::' ~-;::,_-:-_,,:~-_-_~":""::.~~~~~.~_:~-~:-C'..--...- . - :..-.- . . . -~';.~~I~~f~t;f~~;:t.~riI~~~{~.~.-f-~~;~~::: ~.---.. - . :.;', ~. . ffi I .." Definitions I -;',.\.' ," ~.- .,,/..', "::;:,,','~:~.':~<:!he:{ollowing terms are used to help specify the procedures necessary for the TlA: ,;.:..~,~:\. :' ,.:;.:....;;~.)i.:i:~:.(~t!;~:,~:.....: ".0": .; ,;'. "..;;~&~\. i",..\\)\::i~;:{Methodology,Meeting ""This is a meeting with the City of Winter Springs Staff to discuss the , ;J~:;jX~lj.';<':i;;:~i*t~W'meiliodolo:gy;.:tliat. will:be used to prepare the TIA. This meeting is strongly recommended for . .:-',:'i~~f,,::,:, 'i;{;;~~liiii~ip.i-OjeCtsWhere::thetrip generation Will be over 300 new daily (ADT). It is also suggested for projects "'i;;~':',:~;1~:~~ne:~y~~~uernticin isimder 300ADT. '. . ",:,;j;:;;~rf:,:;;..;h/hi:f,~t~lntersection'<A:nalysis -'J\lla1Ysis, of the Level of Service (LOS) of the intersection using the ':;:j~!.~f't~!B1\~##r ,~,f:~~o#:l~;iIYsis~';as:d~P.n.ed'~ythe:1985 Highway Capacity Manual (or latest edition). ' ,~;~~;l't::: .Mt~~;r~~:j~:(,:~,;;t,;;B.~~"r:-"':.:,:);~.-::i;'::~:.::;':::":;";/:'\ " ' , ',' , ' ' ':';i~~Fi:;in, , ,:)~he';Relat,ed:':R6ad' ImPr()"ements - These, are road capital improvements and right-of-way :~~i~1<,:~:'?',:it;r~ttlr~"C1CdiCatioriSfor;direct aecessimprovements'to,the,development in question. ,These include, but are ':;::;~'~'~~:~~n,r~~l~~;~:~it~: fij~\1?~i;)2,:!' ' ' ,.,'?'it;r:":<~:!':~;~J.:';#~f~~t:~.;':~!',i':'l.'1;i' ":,/Site Driveways and Roads;' '" ,',.,i<'.:~".:' 2. ::"Median cuts made necesSary by such driveways or roads; :Yt~l "":'~,:,',?::),~,f,:,!,.:,:,:;:,';', 3.':,,:<f'~ght and)eft tunrdecelera~on or acceleration lanes, leading to or from tliose , '..',', , ' ';~:":dri\{ewa:ys;br'roads' , ,;,:f,' 4. ' \Triifiic control m~~ for those driveways or roads; " , ,5. ':Access or frontage roadS' not considered in impact fee calculations; and 6. '.Roads or intersection improvements whose primary purpose at the time of 'construction is to provide access to the development 'j '1"\::'1 ;"..:~.~;: ~ : B ~ ,:1 ~'" J"':' ~I 'I, L'I ~. , r,'" ~ ' A:' , 19', ~'I ~ , , 1'1 J :~ I ., J - ---- : 'Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis - This is an analysis of the project's site(s) to verify whether a traffic ',: "s~gnal will be required. It shall include, at a minimum, an investigation of Traffic Signal Warrants ,<,,::: /,".<,:J.No. l~ 2. 9 arid'll' from the. Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTeD), latest edition. <"':,:}':;">,1ibis analysis may not be reqUi.rCd ifit can be shown that the traffic volumes are too'low.to warrant , ~ '. ~ch analysis.,' The ~ed for such analyses should be determined in the Methodol9.&Y Meeting. . : ":'-":!: <:/::; ~::~:i?~~~:;;~:'.= '. '::'" ~" . ;":~' ," I.' I ' '; I ,,if:;', ":/>:"';~ffic Genera~ing Development -,Land development designed or intended to permit a use of the :' ;-:':;~"', ""':;,' :I'r'~' iarid: which will 'contain more dwelling uni ts or floor space than the exiSting use of the land. or to ~ I ''.':tW:;;::,:~y'':,;e;:~':~~~~~e~SeChangethe use, of the land in a manner that increases the generation of vehicular ~c. ':?t;.:.:,~""".:'?~):.~!:TriDEnd - A one-way movement of vehicular travel from an origin (one trip end) to a destination ~~' t ::;:~'~rr::~i':idUflf:~kK~e:other:trip end). For the purpose of this requirement, "trip" shall have the meaning which it has l, ~~[~t~";~l~~', . N8 ,. 1(,( ,',',~,'>",<,~,;",I",~,;,:,;;,;,t::'P::: :~ =: -;.~~:~:~t;:,.;..,....;:~, ;:,..... ""'. ~.,~(. . '" "::'.'::-::'\'\\.T~ Lane'- This means the width of pavement required to protect the health. safety and welfare of );::':";::~,~~;'T;\Wili.~":publicandreduce adverse traffic impacts from turning movements, generated by ~ development :,),;':'+)ooto and off of a street Such turn lanes' would include separate left-turn, right-tmn deceleration ',,:.j:,>, "'::, ,,';":,Hines; right-turn free-flow traffic lanes, and right-turn acceleration lanes. W ~J ~ m " .J I I I I I I I; I I I I I I and are summarized in Table J. Municipal collectors were not counted by Seminole County; thus, the consultant made bourly machine counts On all of the roadways currently paved in early 1996. These counts are swnmarized in Tables 4 and 5. These counts were used to help determine roadway classifications and were also used as a base for model validation. , " . . :. :. .:. .' ':~l.r ::~., "'. Available Model Inputs - The City of Winter Springs and th,e studyarea,'define~:~~,ve arC part of. , the Orlando Urban Transportation Study and the Seminole County,TMP~\Eacli'9,~these ',' ' , transportation studies has developed a set of transportation planning model$ anda:.:-set of data that is inpu,t to these mOdei~~ These mput data include descriptioris.bf the'road~y:ri~tjyorks:which normally only include'collectors and high classified roadWays., Addi'tionafI~;:the$e'kldies used . . . . . ., . '" .'... . ...,~ .... " socioeConomic data files which describe land use activities in,discre~t areas:knoW~las traffic' anal. (fAZ"')' :,:',':':':>:{;":'/:..,.:.~:+~':;,"; ,":",', " yslS' zones s ., , " ' , fl. ,d :~"'qt,:,,:,>l;',, 4;..' },f' ..', ' .., ...' ':' . ,~,:-:,: --: ' ~;,~;:, '+:~'(:.,:: ", ': . , : ,', ' ,:' ~,,':.,:',::j,;,:::;~::~':~:~~;~~~i~~~,~:. Id~>;:::~~~(/::'i~~)."", ' These computer files.'and listirigs were gathered so that a complete tinderstandiiig:ofthe <" ',: : , ' '. ..,. .... ~,;:... .......f~.\.. .....l.~.:.~..l:,...:..;..~~..\..,fl:. ",: transpOrtation planning efforts in this area could be obtained..' Ad~ti,9P~,lly~itl:lC:.se::PJeswere ,', , , . ,..", ,..", ..-I.{", .., .transfened to the proper format for, input to the model chosenfoI:,~;sttidY~,4i:?;(~:~~~~", i' ,'.' " " ' ' ,,' ,:>:' '1,~,:~;\,:>:i::',.:'<~:;:{i,;:;;:1~~~(,,; , , ,', ' Existing TranSl)Ortation'Plans - Both state and county transpo~tionplanningactiVities have, produced transportation plans within the Winter Springs Study Area These pl~:have been reviewed and a,listing of the transportation impro,vements,presently P~~~:~,ci:J~!pglaW~~led:" ' (within 5 years) for the c~ty of Wmter Springs and the study area is' provided in Tcible 6~ TheSe improvements will bestud1ed in the,2010 Transportation Plans, and Existing Plus ComInitted Plans in the development of recommendation and concurrency management pro~Ures~ ' ....---- ,. (This space intentionally left blank) III-I I :!. , .. . .~ ..:.:.~ .. '. .~7: .f~:. "'</~I~ , ,-.~,.. . ..:. ;.~: {r~c<. ;~.:~:;~::':'.:... 'f~~W " ' ., .?:...\~.' .... ': .. .". .: .;', :. :;,;;.:. . :>~\~!~\:.' .~~/~:}:~~ @ ~ II, I Roadway u.s. 17-92 , S.R. 434 'I :1 Slt. 419 I I Red Bug Lake Road Tuslcawilla Road I I ,. I E. Lake Drive I Red Bug Lake Road I I Eagle Boulevard I I I Table J 1995 DAil.. Y SEMINOLE COUNTY COUNTS ~RSPRlNGSTRANSPORTATIONSTUDY Location .1995 ADT,~.' ':: Dog Track Road to S.R. 434 S.R. 434 to S.R. 419 52,114 :;-, ,....36.123';>. '> :; . ::' 24,892,>;,},:::;::;'" S,R. 4]9 to U.S. 17-92 S.R. 419 to Tuslcawilla Road "f ::~;)j;~;}~,~, 7#~:~~f.~~~:?;~:E:; .:,' ',:' ..:.J:"f::{16j5i'D~/~!:~;,;:: " ";~',, '15 i$.6 J~i;:~::~'$C!~~\ ... Tustc.aWiUa Road'to Springs Avenue Springs A venue to Eastern Beltway S.R; 434 to Edgemon A venue Edgemon Avenue to U.S. 17-92 -',' ,;i2.2ll,:~:'/::;?_~;~~;\'~;t: " '15,553' '" ';.:' " .. 34,888 ,_ : ,::;!,...'":' Eagle Circle to Dodd Road "Dodd Road to Tuslcawilla Road S.R. 434 to Trotwood B.oulevard 35~790 ]2,058 ] 6,07] Trotwood Blvd. to Winter Springs Blvd. Wmter Springs Blvd. to Dyson Drive Dyson Drive to E. Lake Drive E. Lake Drive to Eagle Boulevard Eagle Boulevard to Red Bug.Lake Road '~d Bug Lake Road to Dike Road Scminola Boulevanl to Fischer Road Fischer Road to TuskawilIa Road Tuslcawilla Road to Brooks Cave Brooks Cave to Citrus Road Citrus Road to Slavia Road Slavia Road to Eastern Beltway Dodd Road 10 Tuskawilla Road 111.12 '. , .'~ " ~. . " .. . .'.:.' ." 'I;;:\~f~;:~ :<?~.".:' ",,: .,~. ~. ';. ,,: - t]~':~~;:~;:;itli,{{~. .:.' . " . :,"'::':' .". ,. ROADWAY '-' SHEPMD RD SHEOAH BLVD HOSS RD. HOSS RD. EOG!:HON AVE:. E:OGEHON AVE:. E:OG!:HON AVE:. WADE ST. DOLPHIN RD. HAYES RD. SHORt RD, 'I' ROT If 000 BLVD. TROTIfOOD BLVD NORTHE:RN WAY NORTHE:RN WAY NORTHERN WAY NORTHtJl.N WAY VISTAlfILLA HINTER SPRS. BLVD HINTE~ SPR~. BLVD. WINTER SPRS. BLVD. W~NTtR SPRS. BLVD. GREENBRIAR DYSON OR. SHETLAND ALTON RD. BIRD RD. TUSKAHILLA TUSCO~ SENECA SENECA " . '~" j'/ ~ 1996 AVERAGE ANNUAL " .~.. T ah 1 e 4 ' :~' :::t*~~\'::', ." DAILY TRAFFIC CQUNT'RESUL~S rROM TO AAW TAA~rIC CO,UNTS TWO WAY ,AVEAAGE COUN~.' ANNUAL :: DAT~i-:;', rooT AOJ. 1996;"~' fACTOR" 3081 1/2(' .. 1 U.S. 11-92 SHEOAH BLVD SHEPARD RD. S.R. 434 5881 1/25 1 S.R. 434 C.R. 419 , 2(31 112( 1 PANAAA S.R. 434 / 4101 1/24 1 S!:HINOLA PANAMA 2"( 1/25 1 PANAMA S.R. 434 31B3 1/~5 1 S.R. (34 C.R. 419 2(80 2/6 1 S.R. 434 C.R. 419 10,3( 1/2~,i, 1 , H1W~S RD. SHORE: 1'.0, 2,41 1/2,5', 1, PANAMA S . R. 434 JJ,81 ,l/2~,: 1 PANAMA S.R. 434 (15 1/,2,9 , 1 TUSCMIILLA NORTHERN WAY 4121 ll2t. 1 WEST OF TUSKAWILLA 2046:', ',', )/~?,; .... 1 WINTE:R S PM. BLVD. TROTWOOD 'BLVD;~ ':: 'fB68~~' ::'~l' 12,'9: : ", 1 TROTWooD BLVD. VISTAWILLA ' 2501:, In,9-,', 1 wnlTER s,ns,," BLVD. SHETLAND .~. . n36" " :'y~:q;: 1 .. GREE:NBRIAR WINTER SPRS. BiND ,19,91 " 1/30;;,' 1 NORTHEIUI WAY SENECA l{lO' " i/31' 1 TUSCAHILL)>. NORTHERN WAY "~,8( , 11.3,0 " 1 NORTHEIUI HAY GREENBRIAR ' " 609,9 .. 1/3i;:- .' r NORTHEIUI'WAY NORTHE:RN ,WAY 7~'8_( , i ~;~1l;' 1 NORTHERN WAY CITY :LIHITS 1226P .. ,1 ' HINTER SPRS. BLVD. NORTHERN HAY 11:41,' , '.1I3f, " 1 TUSCAHILLA SHETLAND 3~62,: , ..',l!3r: 1 CITRUS RD, DYSON DR, ((7'(':,: , .,l/~F : 1 HAYES SHORE 1380':' ',2 {1,': '1 LAKE OR. NORTH 1267 2/1" 1 S.R. 434 NORTH 917 " '~/l~: 1 NORT~EIUI HAY SR. 434 .. 765 ,. ;, 2n:\~: 1 HINTER SPRS BLVD. 1/2 WAY' .. lH~.. '.~;,~},F::' ,1 1/2 HAY VISTAWILLA 1054 ' 1 , f , :"<~" , ' ... " ':'~7~;~;f;~~~~:. ~.. .~:..:.::>'. . .~.?f:::; ..:...... , " " ')\:'i':;~i..:':~~':',; .~'c~i!t~r~i:iiJt&"}~fr, . :::'::'. ....'. ~;~. ::'.~.:rt~~;~~\." "~' .': . .~. .' ,. '.' ~." . " +:, ,~,~~c::,~:;;;~"~E;:'i,;;:' ,"4;:::':~1~~t':;{;: :):,,<1':;:, "~~,c,' ADJUSTED ': ANNUAL ~RArrIC TWO WAY " 3081 5881 2431 4107 2774 3783 2480 1034 241 3381 475 4121 204,6 , , 18..6~ 2501 2736 1991 1410 7384 6099 7484 12260 1141 3262 44 7 4 1380 1267 917 765 lUB, 1054 . . '.'''to'' , ..'.. .:.... "',11":.-'" - ,"/f! ,: ' - .- - - - - .....- - ~ ,..'.' ;.. . ,'j' TABLE 5 " 1996 AVERAGE ANNuAL A.M. AND P.M. PEAK 'HOUR TRAFFIC';~OUNT RESULTS - . .'~' . .~-': .', . ;.. '~:..A.~' ~~. " . AM PE~K HR, ' , ,PH PE~K AM PE~K ( , AAW ~VEAAGt /; AAW ~OJUSTEO TAAFFIC COUHT 'p, ~HHU~!. ~HNU~L ~NNUA!.,:'r ' " ROADWAY FROH TO COUHTS DATE FOOT ADJ.: TAAFFIC TAAFFIC TWO WAY 1996 F~CTOR " TWO WAY TWO W~Y : :~. .. .' SHEPARD 1',0 SHEOAH BLVD MOSS RD. I"'.OSS RD. EDGEHON AVC. EDGCHON ~VC. COGE:KON AVE. WADC ST. DOLPHIN RD. HAHS RD. SHORE: RD. TROTWOOD BLVD. TROTWOOD BLVD nORTHCRN W.... Y NORTHERN W~Y NORTHCRN WAY NORTHCRN W~Y V I STMH t.l.A WINTCR SPRS, B!.VD WINTCR SPRS, B!.VD, WIIlTCR SPRS. B!.VO, WINTCR SPRS. B!.VO, GRE:CHBRIAR DYSOH OR. SIIl:TLANO ALTOH RD. BIRD RD. TUS~AWIUA TUSCOAA S!:IICCA , SCHCC~ U.s. 17-92 SHEPARD RD. S.R. 04' P AN.\MA SE:HINOLA PANNiA 5.1',. 434 S.R. 434 HAYES RD. P ANAlQ, PAN AlQ, TUSC~WILLA WEST OF TUSKAWILLA WINTER spas. BLVD. TROTWooO BLVD. WINTER spas. BLVD. GREENBRIAR NORTHERN WAY TUSCAlH LLJ\ NORTHERN WAY NORTHERN WAY NORTHtRN WAY WINTtR spas. BLVD. TUSCAIHLLA CITRUS RD~ HA'itS LAKt DR. S .R. 04 NORTHERN WAY WINTER spas BLVD. l'/2..HA Y .. SHtOAH BLVD S,~. 04 '\ C.R. 419 S.?. 04 ~ P^NN-t). . S.R. 04 C.R. 419 C.R. 419 SHORE RD. S.R. 434 S.R. 04 NORTHERN WAY TR01'WOOD BLVD. VISTAHILLA SHETLAND WIHTER SPRS. BLVD SEHECA NORTHERN WAY GREENBRIAR NORTHERN WAY CITY LIMITS NORTHtRN HAY SHtTLAND DYSON 01\. SHORt NORTH NORTH, SR., 04 1/2 WAY j VISTAHI LLA 284 501 - 19i' 3'11 243 381 2'13 108 26 319 39 4.44 '230 212 247 270 179 120 521 475 , 653 1043 , 107 261 467 134 ,113 144 " 77 126 86 f ,"/', 1/24 1/25 1124 1/24 1/25 1/25 2/6 1125 1/25 1129 1/29 1129 1/29 1129 1/30 1/30 1/30 1/31 1/30 1/31 1/31 1/31 1/31 1/31 1/31 2/1 2/1 '2/1'" " '2/1 - 2/1 2/1 1 290 1 552 1 224 1 426 , . 1 291 1 .. 332 1 320 1': " 115 l' .. "39 1 344 1 66 1 499 1 204 1 ' ,229 1" ,275 1,' 301 1 " 210 1 ~ 6,2 1 709 1 576 1 ", , 765 ", 1 1211 1 ,,' 129 ~. ", )19 -,',1> ~:,':'',:' ,," ,:4,53 1 .~>;;: >:: -.,;" 15 6 , ,c"~c~~~ ~":,~,.... '. 1';:' ',' 149 .:":;~:"::;'.(:t~.:..... 284 :~ 501 183 3'11 20 391 , 213 109 26 319 38 444 230 212 247 270 119 120 521 415 653 100 101 261 467 " 134 113 " , ~H;,~ 7,7 126 86 - .....-.. PH PEAK ~OJUSTE:D ANHUAL TRAFfIC TWO WAY , 290 552 22 ( 426 29\ 332 320 115 38 344 66 498 20( 228 215 30\ 210 162 109 516 16S 1211 129 )19 453 156 135 ~ 62 19 144 149 ~ ~ ': I Table 6 1996 PROGRA1\1MED AND PLANNED HlGHW A Y SYSTEM JJ\1J>ROVEMENTS WINTER SPRINGS TRANSPORTATION STUDY AREA ., Improvement Plaimed1,' 'Roadway Segment Programmed' . U.S.'17-92 Lake Triplet Drive to Add 2 Lanes 1998 " Shepard Road 'S~R.434 S.R. 419 to Tuslcawilla Rd. ,Add 2 tanes 1997 S.R. 434 Tuslcawilla Rd to Eastern Add 2 Lanes , 1998 Beltway " -Ttislcawilla R4;,;" , Dik~' Rd to Red, Bug take Add '4, laneS ' " , 1997 ,: , ' .. Tuskawilla Rd. Red Bug LakeRd toE. Add 2 laneS 1998 ' " Lake Drive . TuskaWi1Ja R.d. E. Lake Drive to Winter Add 2 Lanes 1998 Springs Boulevard , Tuslcawilla Rd~ Winter Springs Boulevard Add 2 Lanes 1998 to S.R. 434 Lake Drive Seminola'~oulevard to Add 2 Lanes 2002 TuskaWilla Road . Moss Road S.R. 434 to S.R. 419 Add 2 Lanes 2000 Winter Park Dr. Wilshire Dr. to Seminola Add TUrn Lanes 1997 Boulevard "'-,--- S.R. 434 U.S. 17-92 to S.R. 419 Add 2 Lanes 20101 (6 Total) S.R. 434 S.R. 419 to Eastern Beltway Add 2 Lanes 2010 (6 Total) ,. ,,- U.S. 17-92 Shepard Road to Airport Add 2 Lanes 2010 Boulevard Red Bug Lake Rd Tuskawilla Rd. to S.R. 426 Add 2 Lanes 2010,. "",::;,~>, '."'.:~ . , ,t ,I' :-~:~ " .,:~~~_'h. Tt ,~ ,',~\, ::;):iJL...':}: ,f/'I':"',y"','if."""';" ~~ "'::'j~';:'-'~:.:~ :'.~ ::. ~ ~~ i I, .j :1 :; .r, . 1,1 ,':": -,~:'.;::'.:~~::' \:~~. .;:"",,:j:~'::.:~:..J_:~. " I' I I : I I I r 1. Contained in construction program ofFDOT or Seminole County. 2. Contained in OUA TS 20 I 0 Plan Update (Adopted Highway Needs Network). 3. Latest dateyased on need. This applies to all "2010" numbers in this column. :' J :~ I .~ 'r ,} I '" ' "" ilj-~If~:' , .'. 111-1 5 ...., ,. @. ~ ~ ~ I I 'I' .- . . , ' o. ,_ . ',:'1' ~' ;,1 .. :~.-(: . "" , " ' "." ", ~,I, I I " I' , , I', .. , , I: I, I: 1 I " Level of Service Policies - Level of service (LOS) standards are essential for transportation : plao:ning'to determine both existing traffic conditions as well as project future deficiencies and , , reqUired 'faCility improvements. The LOS of a roadway or roadway section analyzes the ::,:FOr1p.:~,~/p',~},?fan existing facility in tenns of its operating condition. There are six levels of <''sem~~u1e~:iirtraiisportatioIi planning that are ranked in descending order of safety and ,'"chri\i~cie~;2~:oftravel from level A to ,level F. Adescription of the accepted service levels is as "fOl~,6.ij~~~;!_;~/~, :, " LeveJo:'ofStfMce . , ......: :',f.~:'~;~.~~dl Description ':'.... A,}} , l.lighest quality of service a particular road segment can ",: provide. General.condition,of free flow in which there is , yeiy little or no restriction on spread or maneuverability , , caused by the preSence of other vehicles. ;;y~-;;:j1;;'.~;~i~~}:~..; . . : . . ,:' ", :. ;:' ~'" ;.... '/::': :,',,//'B.",' :'."":..-:" ::::-...;........:;:.! "', .;.. ,Reasonable unimpeded traffic and stable flow., Ability to ',maneuver within the traffic stream is only slightly' restricted., and stopping delays are not botherSome. -, ,'. .. , ""';iiC , Characterized by s~ble flow, but restrictions in freedom to select speed, to change laries, or to pass is becommg' , restricted for most drivers. '-, " , D Approaching unstable flow. Tolerable average operating speeds are generally maintained but are subject to considerable and sudden variation. Driving comfort aOO_ freedom to maneuver are low because of increased lane density, adverse signal progression, inappropriate signal timing, or some combination of these factors. ' E -Indicates significant delays and lower operating sp~,c;d.s. Suc:h operations are caused by some combination of adverse progression, high signal density, extensive queuing at critical intersections, and inappropriate signal timi.n,g. Driving comfort is low and accidental potential is hiilt. ,. F Forced flow operations at extremely low speedS. Ro~dway tends to act as a storage area and intersection congestion is likely at critical signalized intersections, with high approach delays resulting. Adverse signal progression is frequently a contributor to this condition, . .. .:,,~. :' ;: ("'''''' .... :'" ',"', ' ~ ',':..:' . .:J..~: ~'.i.!".;~;~t~J~;. 111-16 "'I" " ~ ,.'...... . ... ..',. ~ '" I ~ J " t... " h' ,c.',-" '" ~.~ ". .' : .....:.. ~:, ',:", ': -i.~..,' .: ,t:>-.:. ". ~~ti'(', ~ i ,:'-;' , _ ' .. ;. ;.<.. ""- .;.... i;i::~r::" H';; t .. ~: . .. ' ,The City of Winter Springs falls into the category of "Inside Transportation ConcUrrency Management Areas" for the PurPoses ~f determini~g LOS standards. Lacking the concurrency management designation, the City is part of the existing Orlando Urbanized Area as defined by FDOT and the MPO which requires LOS D. Seminole, County has determined that Tuskawilla Road within the City limits falls within an.... ___ Urban Center Traffic Impact Area The CO\.U1ty's strategy, as per their Traffic Circulation Support Document Volume IV of the 1991 plan update, allows a LOS E within these areas while , a LOS D is the minimum standard outside of the defined area. .. ,';", ." , "In accord with the. Comprehensive Plan and previously adopted standards, Level of S~rvice "0" ");',6iiditiODs on all roads within"the City of Winter Springs and the study, area was used as the .::miillmum standard. This corresponds with FDOT recommendations shown in Table 7 above. ':)"Level of Service standards have been reduced to daily roadway capacity (service volumes) terms 'in' order to Penrut assessment of both existing and forecast conditions. The FDOT, daily roadway capaci~es,as shown in Table 8 for LOS D were used (circled service volumes). -.> a ~, ; '."" ' : Existing Deficiencies - Given the standards defined above, the existing roadway system in the ~ i):(:", ,:~ ::: study area ancI'ihe City of Winter Springs were evaluated. TIlls eval~tion was based upon ~~.~f::;"". ., ;<,~xisting roadway volumes as documented in the previous discussion on traffic counts. ~ r~-:.~~r'~-"",r:r.:/'~ ",.::,:..::", .;. .' . ~_:,~~~~,;,{,::':_:"" These analyses indicate that many roadways on the slate and county system within the study area .... '. '... '. .... .' ...' ..:~. I - - ::;;~~::.::~',:::..,:>:",>;~~ere not:;ope~ting within LOS D in 1996 (see Figure 3). Almost all are contained in Table 6 as ~!}{~;;~'L';~\~~8!};i<:>~n1i~t~d improvement projects, However. the following are not and need immediate artention: ~;~:'~!1:~~~~:~'f0i~~;!/',{:~":, ,,: ' ' III-I 7 ~ ~ -'~2;~ ~:_:~~~~:~~~:~::.~{::'.," - I - -- - ~ ~-:-:'!':~'~~~::-?~=,;':.';'~'~:~~,-::'~.;~:ji~~~~~:'~:<_::_;~:: :-... ~'-.--.":_'~.' ~ 0;':,- _.____..___ _ .~~'.....'~,.....r'd::}:."..;-,:~4.f.-- _n _ . _ _ _ _ __ ____ ___ _ _ ___-= =_.,_. ~.'o.,::,,~. ,'~'~.'~~', -: _ n___ _ ____~ _ ~~_-.~=~~~._. ____~:~~..'7~:~~~;~:r~:.:~j.~; <'>;:' ____ O:.-=_-O-O'.,,:-_-__~:..~2~~..,.,-___'__--.........r;..,-....~...... . ~- h;;~;~.~..~~;;.__1l~.;:~~.~-~.~~...~. :'-:--: ;.~':~. ~~.!l::;~ ". " a ~ I I" ' Utul~ ~I,': .,' " UDCI . i, '2,UDdiv. ,'.'..,:~Oiv. 6Div. .>" ". T.\ i\ I. r~ Ii GENERAUllD ANNUAL AVERAGE DAley VOLUMES FOR FLOTU DA'S URBANIZED AREAS. Sf An: TWO- WAY ARTER1ALS fREEWAYS UN/JIT'ER.RUrTED fLOW Groap 1 (within arb...izod 1IU av<:, 500..(X)(J and ~OE 10 Of' J>>..Uin within 5 mika oC \be p<Urury ci1J ccn\n.l b.ni.ocu di:nria) E Lcvcl ot Sav>co LaveJ 0( Savloe Lu>cs A B C 0 I! A B C 0 E -4 n.oo:J Jj.200 51.900 67.r1XJ ao.8OO 8.900 lJ.900 18,900 2-4.800 )).100 6 )).100 52.900 79. .4()() 100.600 126.900 21~ J.S,8OO 50.100 60.100 71.600 8 4-4.100 7O...soo IOS.900 13-4. ](X) 169,.200 J1.2OO n,700 75.200 90,.200 107,-400 ' 10 .s.s ,.200 88,,200 lJ2. .4()() 167.700 211. .4()() 12 63.200 101.100 l.H,700 192;200 242.)00 ! ~,f.jii~~!0:-;::ry;r:::~. :',1,;';:":' ::;";,.,2_UDdiY. : - 12,600 = 16,600 J1;,::;:;;:';'JiiE. : = ='~E : '",,:.Qau Ib (2.:SO 10 -4.50 .ip;a.aJizod iol.cD<:C1lo<u per mile) , ".r' ' Lcvd o! Scrvlo: AU BU C 8,800 19.200 293'00 J..S.800 " ,,:;:, ,:"UDc:s, ; ,I::::,<>':;~-:, :i:.:;~ ~~!".,' '6Div. 8 Div. I E... 17,000 c )j,800 L. $).700 A 65..800 s s E 15.900 J.4.000 51,-400 62.900 " CLo.u U (mon: tha.a 04.50 Ji~ iDtcn<:Ctiocu per mile and DOl , witll.iA primary city o:ntn! lnuiocu cfuuia oC arbW:n:d uca aYU 500.000) I l..>.Dc:s 2'UDdiv. ~ Oi:", )6Piv. , , ';.'80iv.' I' ."',, ". '. , . . '... :.'.-' ~. '. .'.: ,,:;' ", AU BOO Lcvcl or Scrvlo: c" o 11.800 26..soo 40.700 -49.700 E lj .200 )).400 .50,600 61.800 .1.." ,-,:,CJ.a,u Ul (mon: lhaa ....50 Jip.aJin:d ialcDcCtiocu per.ml1e and ~ "" ,', 'prim.uy city CCltnI buJincu cfulrla oC arbWmd ua 0VCf soo,OOO) . .~ I',,' , .' ,~. ",:bncs ' "'>~I~':'{ , _ ~'Div. , .8 Div. . .... .- .~ I : " ",' ',' ... .,:" '.:.~ "," '. ,- " ~ . ':')~:i..:':;:..-<:~~':: ,):;;;",~:": 1".: ,~' f~!,,)/lL;.::,;::{~::,,: " An au Lcvd oC Scrvlo: CO' D lJ.200 29 ..soo <<.800 5-4.700 E ....800 )2.600 49.JOO 60.100 lulo 4 6 8 10 U Groa p 2 (withia lllb-uUn::d a rea and DOC ia Gt-oop 1) Lcvd of ScrOos C .(8,800 7J..wo 'l7 ,.900 l22.JOO loCO.ooo A 20.300 30,600 oCO.8OO j l.CXXl , ~8, 0400 B :n..soo 48.900 6.5.200 81.soo ~.200 0' 61.800 93.000 12...000 , W,r1XJ 177.300 lulo 2Undiv -4 Div. 6 Div. c I. A UIlC 3 2 UDdiv 3 4 Div, II NON-STAn: ROADWAYS MAJOR CITY/COUNTY ROADWAYS Lcvd oC Scmc= C~ 10.900 ~~.200 2... .4()() J7,800 -47,jOO An au E 7~...sco 117.JOO l56,JOO l<Jj, .coo 223,600 E 1~.soo )).200 5Cl.2OO E" 11.700 15100 ADJUsrM.ENl:'S DMDEDlUNDrvIDED (a11er c:ocrcs:pondin& two-~y volume indicated pa=t>t) l..tncs Medlu Lc!t Tara Bap Adj=uncnt Faaon 2 Dm6cd Yu +5'Ko 2 UodJ-o.ided No .~ MaJti U~ Yes .5'llO Malti U~ No .ll'Ko C L. A S S III l l l- I il OTHER SIGNALIZED ROADWAYS (1ipalizcd in" fV'1:' ioG uuJyt.is) Lcvd or SetYio: A" B" C 5.200 11 ~OO ONE-WAY (a1\cr con-<:<p<>adia l tw-o--1Iy vol woe IDdic:a.tcd pct<X1Il) OM-Way Cotrc.poc>dJ~, Adj~ Una T...,..WIY Lanes F.ooc 2 4 ~ ) 6 ~ 4 a -4O'J'. 5 8 -ll'l& 01 D<.JT "'-"""1 ,. " n..~""'IOt____.~"".--....d"'-..tO'<#y bf",--,,-,,,,,,,,, ~ 'J')o.~~ too- ~ch..eob'or:,,,,,,,,,,,, -..o.U~ --db --. ~~ ~ .., no.. ~ -'" ~ -.....- -ono J-..A4 _.... -'" boo ~ _ ~__......... --. -............. ~ ~ v..a..-.-- - --I ~.....:..., ~ C~ -:-- ""'-"'- i I' ',c..';>":': :";:." (.......~K-""'=--.--........ .......,__It...~.,~.....4_'--'_....I""H~r c...,-.a.r,....-...urj"- -.J~-'1\c..~......4~~ ,......~.---.--- ".. .., .... '--' ., ~ 0--'.. ~ __ "- "'-A Iti!li.ii:),t:~;';~~7'---- rJl- :,~r~\'~bX': fj I, ~ti'~m~~;30:" sl~::~~;.. . ; .~.,"~ :~~~~~}~1?:';~;~;:;~ - ~~ I ~~:; :1;; i1:~~;)~~:I'j":..;;'~~,J..:""... ..... .......,.. ......; I~"'" ","II!t~.. :', .... :.:....... ':;~"" I'~~ ."1 . .._... ---=-. '--- .~:: _ .__ -"...,.....,,- .- .... ':' _....:...~t.:~r......~~'.ft,~~._.:~.: .' ":. 'J' ~~.,~,. .~. '" ....~ ~ '... - '- Wi;~'i:'~" ': ':~?J~I'~?! 0,. ' rru~;~I:,<:,~,' :': ..,l:....~~:.. . :~~~b:.~.~~~i:~.,:.~. :.; .,;;;[;c;:, ' ,~~'..~ il!IT " o.,.~ %::l in: ~c. 1'0 ~ Jt o':~X'~:t ~..~....o ..~. - ~6 i 3 o. . . .::-.":...:.:..,. , . :'. .'. ;;. .' : ..... . ~ .. .... ';~:. ;~~:... ~ . ,,::,JEGEND: ,,:i',:r:;~ii~:;", " :' L, " ,1 ': DEfJ.qIE~f(EXCEEDS'Lbs D) . . :,.' "';.~' .'. . .". .1 .:. .ti.: :' It,,,, , . /'. ~ 8 0 ~ > r.1 F. ~ l..I % ! I VI ... t- ? .., '" ~ .... Irs ~~ 8~ h --om 0]) ~Q ;pm S~ zill ~ 0 -< ,~ We :D m '-' z , C2 ~ ~< LAKE DR.' RED BUG LAKE RD. f . ....... 11m::( ~ -N- ,~ N.T.S, i" .- "<t e::: U r- ~ ~ \, 2, ~ ,:'''.'",J, . ~..; .. :......~.~.\ ':. ;:~':', "'",1 >', ' , ;:!,':~:i',:', :;;'~",~:,':,,);;~:S.17-92 is in lhe long range plans of the MPO (OUA TS); however, it is very deficient and . 1lllI',;,.;,:, " :,":"-"', 'should be moved to lhe FDOT five-year construction program. Neither the.S.R. 419 nor Red ~::;:;' .::, ":,,i'.,;:,B'~g Lake Road sections mentioned above are contained on any progranimed or planned 2010 ,~, .,i~:,';~'}:;;;f::,:\:\;,:;:~,)fP,prov,~IIle,nts ,list. There are no, municipal collector facilities within the, City of Winter Springs -~"":<";~~.!~Ii'"onefatinp,at a LOS of less than D in 1996. ,,', ' , f:7F:S;,;\',:}?,,::;':',:',S:';;:: " ~,' ' , ", ..:.' ':',':,,:: Model Development and Validation ;~:,:~':'::, ",,,,,<;~i\"':";/.,"i:.' ". , , -'.=-::~';i~:;,:U~.:,~:(!i.i'i~.Idi~ad..ntiately: forecast, future trc1ffic condjtions in a rapidly urbanizing'"aIea'such as the City of ", '~~,t~l.'w::~-'.{':1f,.~;w:'i ,,"...-..,.- , ,,', ' , , " " , ' , , ' ' , " " '~:?~~,:~...::0~::~7:,:",N!i.ri'te~$prngs~a se~ of tr-l...!L~!tatiO!lp!<lnn;n& models must be developed:'3nd validatecl In the Case ;;;,:/:,~:;./j<:):;;:{,~!:,Q_fj;-ihe.city: of Winter Springs, such models exist and these models havebeeIi i>~viously used to ' - :;"/"~~'''}::'~;iE:~':::'::a~avhiQP j;,ity ~'regional and couotY-:-wide plans. These models are contmned in', the model set ~!s:mitz;:~r~~f4!fOrilie Orlando Urban Area TI3DSpOrtation Swdy. .." :~':':~''',','::'::':':;:.:''':i:~1~:9rder to provide the more detailed analysis required for the City of Winter Springs, this model set ~..:::' ":, .,::: ,.Yf,~ modiPed. These modifications include the development of a: more detailed T AZ set .i{>:;:'!:",;.i/~,;;:,(tAicroz<:lOes), "a' more detailed highway network, and the use of TRANPLANIFSuTMS model ' structure. These changes require the yalidation of,the model set used in this process even though this ,model setis derived from and closely resembles the OUATS model set. ~ Cill ~ I, I" , ' ."', " , .".~' :.,.. : ;.: ? ,,);,:'~ ,: .. " ';' S,R, 419 - U,S, 17.92 10 Moss Road, U,S. 17-92 - Shepard Road 10 S,R, 419. Red Bug Lake Road - Winter Park Drive to TuskawiJla Road. .:, , ',Itf- :~~~. ;.~ : ~'. .i.- :; ,The model set used was originally tested and confirmed in the casselbeny Transportation Plan and Iinpact Fee Study_ It is derived from and based upon the OUATS model set: lbis mode~as been modified as detailed below. OTJA TS Model Set - The transportation planning models used in. the Orlando Urban Area .': 7,;:r~rtation Study have-evol....ed from a ~e~ of models developed in the mid-sixties and based upon :>:;,,;.,<;?S~~Ii.sive home interviews conducted,.at,.that.time. The model set is divided into fol;\!. general ,;:,;r:;':~9tionsand modifications to each of these functions have occurred over the last twenty-five years. " ' ,,'::: Trip Generation - The existing OUATS trip generation m~el is a cross-classification person trip 1:.", ",'..~ ,':t',',production model with attractions calculated using expressions derived from regression ~alysis. , , " , , ,:,~ ,model currently uses 11 pwposes including special generator purposes for the major tourist i, '--:,:, :'" ';:"a.~ctions, the various universities and colleges in the region, and the Orlando International AirPort. ~ ':, ,;::~).-::!:,,:,:'1)i,~ model requires extensive data not generally available such as the forecast of the median income ,:::':1,>>::' ;':::,) , ,~?:,~ar ownership by zone for the calculation of home-based productions. .! :p~".~:t:.', ::-'~:-> "".' '., .:./~. . ~:<',\;t:':::;, ,;~,::-tri'p Distribution - The OUA TS trip distribution model utilizes each of the II purposes for which '~ :"::,-:,':';':'<:' ~r~uctions and attractions are generated. Friction factors for each of these II purposes have been ~ :; :,,',,:-':;<:;':,', " : de'...eloped. although the special generator purposes generally borrow friction factors from other ", :."',' ~:;:iiit~~~~_:;, -20. , - - - "~:;;2~::-~~-;~~ti.~~~~7!S;~~.~,ff.~~:~ <;. . -- ....-...;-.. . .~.:~ ~~;-:; ,j.c;:.~;~:~{~.1:.'!}\~\~.~'!..-./.:;.:; ~ 6 purposes, There are not K-factOrs utilized in the model. :'.'Modal Split! Auto Occupancy - The OUA TS model set includes a multi-nomiallogit expression for ;, calculation of splits of trips to the tranSit sector. Auto occupancy is calculated with simple rates by , , ,','.. :~ purpose. The modal split model is system-sensitive in that it requires the coded description of a i ,~'~::~%~i~:,;;~E)~:!;'{i~it syste~., , i ,:,,~:..;f:,:';'\ ,,::',::)~~'~r:r-affic,' Assigriment -: ,The current OUATS traffic assignment procedure consists of a 4-iteration ~ ,:::,,:.;;,:>::;:.::'}r::;{*{ii'n~trilliJ..l'as:5i~6it!vith capacitj restraint This process is applied using network descriptions : l,:'!!,/".'::;:;':Yiii'.'accordanCe' with, the 1979 version of the Urban Transportation Planning System (UTPS) ,"';,;;.;!'.',.."<~;:~'~eveloped by the US Department of Transportation. I:;;~li;~:f~,;:';\.;~~):( ;,~~.:::;,:, '~;, ' ,,::~, ,;.' ...;:..:;",\..',,' ,,' , " ";,X}~:J..'!.f;:{l.;~~:i'~epe..<1H.;p Mn(!if1r~t;nn<:.~Jn,orderto make Use of the data available from Seminole County '~:':r-!tf~~~J}!\)..~~~:Wto~aV6i(l'the neCessity to foteCaSt mcOmc and'carownership as required by the OUATS,trip .I'~}~&~tt:~?::;:;?<J!~~n,~iatio~:xl10del. mod~catioD.s werem3de to thi~ model. Th~ trip generation m?de~ ~ed are ::;.?:~~~:;,~(;,.':):';:OlJS~(l::upon:,Jhe OUATS-:models~ but these models mcorporate sunpler rate expressIOns mstead of , ::)Ft;i:~~;:,+;:.:;~:;t'~the;m()re cOmplex croSs~lassification models. These models have successfully been used numerous I; ,',..::::: ::':,::;,:i:':~,~~$neS iIi the Orlando area including Casselberry and for Seminole County projects.' In addition to .,<",':~':';:< -'/", <,i,$eTransportiltion Plan aild Impact Fee Study in Casselberry. the models were use'd to forecast trip , i;~~li~~;~i{~,~,jii~.;~~.I~~~er:~on !?~:the Lak~,lv1ary Boulevard ~onidor Study and the Lake ~ary/I:4 ~terchange study ".,"X': '.' , "~,fur the'Flonoa' Department of Transportation. The models forecast vehicle tnps mstead of person 'trips so they-additionally do 'not req~e a separate ,auto occupancy model. The structure of the trip I' ','., ::::genetation statements used as input to the modefvaIidation procedure are detailed in Table 9. 'The ': '::input socio-economic' data for the Winter Springs traffic zones (Figure 4) was approved by the City for: 1996 and 2010 (see Appendix). All other zones used Seminole County or OUA TS data (in 'Orange County). ... --- I J.. ,,::1".;;::,'.' ,: Use ofOUATS 11 Trip Puqx>se Models - Since lrip generation expressions were available for each . t.}{tf:'<:>;;-:;,,';'j?f:~~:qYATS n~n-speci~ gen~rato~ purposes: it was deci.ded to use the entire .11 p~se models : ::,;~:,,(:,,::, ,/, ;'::"'t:!available 1Ii OUA TS. Tl.iis reqwred mcorporatmg the speCIal' generator express10ns aVallable-fro~ " .'-' ,- - _'~"":<\,,;-,:::,::'~!' \:':',:;Q.tJ;~TS. into the \X/inter S;)[~~'lgs Model Set This use of the full OUA TS model P.!lllJoses , J,':',,~':::,:,:::,/;~;:0fr~1.~,~'tiOriallY permitted use of the OUATS friction factors. 1';2:~;~f{i,;;r,~~ ' .............. 'l.~<.' .' '. , J.,;f~0~\:'?:,):;:;~;;}L,', ' !.~~~):~ii ~:.: ;" :.: ~. ~';~"~" .,.~'" .: .' .,..': . , ~iiif.{~!~t};:~~}M~:\~;{;:;h-,'; - ---- ~'::'~ ._~.;!:.::~~-;~r.;-~~t{~';.~.~':';~..~'":;.:.~. 7;-. -21 - r ~ ij ~ I . ~ . " ' TADLE9 TIUP GENERATION EXPRESSIONS (VEHICLE llUPS) Winlcr Spri:ogsTr:Jnsport3Iioo Sludy - 1996 '/1;;.::':","'. "'::. 't .:... , , . '<.:~.~:.i . ":' . ,..>.:.!, : :~J}"~',firgl!~I18~~iB:;'" '~~!f;." ,~.;:",' H~m~basc Social- Rcc. t' .: .r., ; I ~~<;::;j;:~;;;i~~;~,::;k~~i.~~c ,~O.;,~' ,,., :;S'::~I{;:;$:i> . .: , '", ":, 'iJ!'l'I '''~1~1-J.}'''t''''.~'''''''' . "'c,' :,r",'~~l.;.)',: " ' i;;jl~~f!\iil_M;?;:;~~~'" \,,' Homeoase Shopping : L ~4.~A\~;t~~;fg~~~~~e;p,CfS'~;~US. '11 HomcbaSc Social - Rec. ~. ',' t:. ", . ,"" ,Homc:base School Non-Homebased ! 'f 'OTHER TRIP PURPOSE PRODUCTION AND A TrRACTION J, . ::.!: -~ " I . . ! ..:," ..' . ..,' .... ..: :,'.',',;~,~ .,:;,,~~,;,,:,.. '~:,f,'..',;,!~ ~ :' ~. .......'-.."'!.:Y!:~~~~~.!'"_-'!~:~~!::!o;'-~~~.~~--'!'!!!~~.:o!"j.~""~!..~.:~ . ;"~,:=:':':~-;;'-:;~;;-~;;:;~~:';';::;.7;;-";;;:;;':;=;:::;';.;;:;~-;;~;;"::';:;'~';:;;'::~,,::; .i~.~._.~~~."..~.:',.: : :~ f.ff,ar.J$'C~~..=..~~~'L~U:~ti'ifS~;'~:r~~.;~~~.;;.: ~ ..::;;.:; ,:';. -; - .,........'"1;.::...~~~..~~~~n~Lr....I.:.IA1_.E;J.....~~~~~~',.~,1~"'-~"!._ :::: .~.' n~.___. .___-:-_-==::. o..:=.,:-:'u__..._:'::.:.._-..:._ _. ~.. ':;-.'.'. ''';';':~.-.; : -.I.,;. :;-. -.;~"'~!~::~~7.;'~;:;l~r'(~~~~,~;ii:-~\ff.li;i\~;.~~~:~~~'~:T~' ;.:'" ,PRODUCllON EOUA TIONS ,... ::": ,..1A I (Dwelling Units) + 0.32 (Hotel-Motel Rooms) .. ' :'.L;'; j... . =;: 1.37 (Dwelling Units) + 0.48 (Holel-Motel Rooms) ''';'';;'Q~68 (Dwe II irig Units) + 0.48 (Hotel-Motel Rooms) .... ..;- . '. ,,~: 0;76 (Dwclling Units) + 0.96 (Hotel-Motel Rooms) '"t~~Dr~'fLZE:~:~) . . .. . .. . '''';:'';:~~CTlON. EOUA TIONS ~:O.43 Retail EinployIDcnt'+ 1.13 Other Employment - .a.IS 4.20 Retail Employment + 12.06 " ,=:,0.:23, S,ingJc Dwellirig Units + 0.54 Hotel-Motel Units + 0.59 Total Employment - 11.05 , . 0.30 Total Dwelling Units + 0.84 High School Attcndancc + 0.69 Retail EmployIDent + 19.25 0.08 (1-6 Attendancc) + 0.13 (7-12) Attendance) + 3.02 = 0.56 Total Dwelling Units + 3.80 Retail Employment + 0.32 Total Employment + 6.52 ,. 0.96Retail Employment + 0.37 Total Dwclling Units , + 0.14 Other Employment + 27.56 Truck Trip Production - 0.42 Retail Employment + 0.12 Total Dwelling Units. , + 0.13 Hotel-Molel Units + 0.0'1 Other Employment + 24.36 :0 Calculated Through the Use of Growth Factors -22, .:-:'. :,::,;':"~ ~:.~/: ::/~.:. . . . ::)~'-;.T~~.::::F":-' ~ . - ---- ,. t'" I: i 'i ~ i l I~ =~ :~lll ~ ~:.~~ ......; ""..- ''-'''' "=' t:::.J~u l.. 0 ~ ,$' >', -', II 'pi " '... .~ .~ ,I ~ ,0 N 0 .. 1 .., ... <> '=> ..., . ---:0-' ., ._~ . . . :.j:. ~..-=.._ l~'.~l! ' :~'~ ~'i_:l.~i':'~'~':'! i.~;:" '.- '-':~I;-f1.'~1 .."--.._11.....1._1...1_.. ...._ .; '~ . , .., . '. I '. " .. ," ,',' ,.;t;, ':' ",<ii~f;~;'!~:,}:;,;*[ij~~f.< " CITY OF WINTER SPRU~_O$.::t\~,:W(.:' MASTER PLANNiNG"~AP"',:~';l:;f}:' OCTOBER ma :::;,,~,;~f~~,:,~ ' '" ~,:'-~':::~',',',',',~.",:,',',,':,',::',:' ','..~..,~,j~.,._, , ,~i;(d> '.< -.,.,.. ,~".. ' '\~!~' "k.. ';:"~'j;r.t;.\ ,~ 1:: . ...-..-.. ," '-- ,:~: '::1;;;'M::"" ~:.:~'.- ~~. .., N ! --' .~. .:.-i:~' -:' :.., . .:..,.;~~:~/~f._~::..--. 4,'-' ~~.,' :':~ ". : . ~:~~ ~ ' '.:."" ,;(SU/' ~I.IUI U-IC( JCSW ~ ~ :D '~f8 t @~ f\ U ON ~~ :>m aU) z ~ o -< ~~ ~ -.. r ( I r ~ ~ I , r QUAIS Hig.hwav NCfVJork Modifications - Thc micro-computcr proccss selectcd for use in this ,,','Winte~Springs Transportation Study is the TRANPLAN battery of programs as incorporated by the ':Flo'h~,~ qepartment of Transportation into Micro-FSUTMS. This battery of programs was 'developed by the Florida Department of Transportation in order to provide a standardized tool to ",' 'lo,c~(k~~~~: throughout the state. ,This mode.1 is designed to, enable the local planner to utilize the ','d~~'files and 'routines available throughout the State of Florida on micro-computers. ( ,..r..>:.:(</:;..7';.r.::;.;tti'~" .!.:'l....,!;::.,.:.'.:-.....:~7,.;l:...<....; ........'.,:...:.:... .~<.:..., ,<.... '. . .i> I ,,~'.~; ;:~;"';~;)i'~;~Th~, i.~gioDa.1'~etwor~:,~J:1psen for ,use in bOth casselbepY,and WiLlier spririgs was used by Seminole ;:" ':' '....:::,.'::' County intbe development of their Transpo~tion : Management Program (IMP). This network , :reqwed some modifications as zone siZes are extremely large;' ;~:!~;lt.\~f~i~!~Ir~l{4~~f!~i:~~ J ,'::: '., "~,..:k,n~~<?~kan~i..~newc;:~e,~, subdiVlqed,mtoIl~wzonesco~panble Wlth the detailed highway J ' , : n~t\.vo~k preYiouslY,,~~c.ribe<l, Since', the' zone str,Ucrure in Casselberry was previously developed for a yery detailed s;ttidy',' it was retained outside the City, of Winter Springs. The resulting network ,', . (;Q~~~iped,:~OQ ,zon!;~:::~th 29,,.:,I1ucr<>:,:,zones ,yngll..n. the: City of Wint~r, Springs and 86 in the '.J. ",:.",>~:,i~,~iberrY"ar~ Mit~z~nes,~~d,in:"the'CitYof:\Vmter Springs are, shown in Figure 4 and those in~asselberry are provided'in the A}?pendix. I I I J I I . . . . , ,:-Winter Springs Transp~rtation NetWork ~ Since th~ OUATS basic network was utilized as a skeleton :':':''f~r:th~:'Winter Spnngs:Srudy. roadways had .lobe add~d to the model structure. Existing major '., roadways in the planning area, are: -' ... '--- 1. 2. 3. 4. ",5. 6. 7. ,: 8. " ,9. ,1. 2. ), 4. 5, S.R.434 Tuscawilla Road. Red Bug Lake Road S.R.,436 U.S.,E;,Q2" " Sem.ip.ola Boulevard-Lake Drive S.R. 419, , Wiriter Park Drive S.R. 426 Roadways added to the Winter Springs Network in this study are: l,;~i't~~~!~;i*;'( , . . .".._ ....H . -2't - "' til ~ '. ,,". . " ,: :'1. .....:.....' 6, 7, 8. 9. 10. II ~!~::;: Hayes Road Moss Road Edgemon A venue Sheoah Boulevard Sheparel Road Shore Road ;. \,.. i", . I I' ~". ;:;~~,::''', ....~.. . ,". ", . . ,"... . , , ;:,..-:;, ::/~}li~;:;,99mp;!e:Fe, '~,~96::,net\york ~fd, ip,L~s, study' is: s~()wn ; in, Fi&lJfS ;2, ',1996, Existing Roadway '1.': :,' " ::=' ::':1WP~~~iJj~r'.~eari:~:N~rr of~~.:::1/,;:::L"':; ',,~: ::-:~:,,~~i' :/"i',';;" , ,'," : "i'>;~~':',' , ',: ,,' , ' " " Model VaH?atio~:," ",', ",,::>:}',,' I' ",:,.;'~~~~i~w~~~t~~~~~~u~;i~~~~J~J~t~~i;::.~~ I, .. ""featuies an<,tcut a.sfewmajor:~etS~aS'poSsibleJQ;:minimi7e:,tli~:'cost:of:triivel;inventories which II ,:/.:wo~d'~,~~ductectat,tho~e,~uj~~ ""fu:the:ilWmte(:Sp.nngs..:~l~g '~:there ~,~. Screenlines. !':'",: "':. " "_ '"'. . '. ".:~. ~.',. ,- ....: "," . . .-: 6'" I::::. :.,,:':f ':to' ;. " . '.' ,I, .:-.!' . ','. .:... ..;. .!.' I . '. .' . ',' . :' . <::ScieeDlirieNIunS;,east-West, and:S~esrB and'€:Iui1::riorth';'sOutli\':TheSe screenlines, are shown ,inFiguresi}i ,;, "~:,;'" "",' ".',,:,::; .. I, .' . . . I.. . . ",.:. I' Model valid~ltion was' accomplished: by, -loacling,of the cUn;eIlt; tIjp" table :(J:996) on the network (see, ; 'Appendix roi Traffic ASsiwnent' Node, Map) and ,d>mpaDrig' ~ignC;d :~61u:mes to' observeq volumes as determined by traffic courlts. The I:SUTMSffR,ANPLAN coniputer,prograrns examine the paths from origin to destination to determine'which'linksare used',and then accumulates trips from the origins to destinations on the links:;:",Capacity ~t-.waS'used in the, process of calibration to change link'speeds:in 'fespoose:t,o,,'loaded:'voliunes: With'-'the:objective of providing realistic assignments:, The:,:.files n~ to reprOduce the, 1996 E + Cand, 20 1 0 traffic are shown in 'f abIes .. 10, 11 and 12, provided to the City along with the firial report. I I I :An Equilibrium Assignment (FSlITMS) Vros use~to"have a more balanced loading on the network. Tabl~ 13 shows the screenline resultSon:,'screenlines, A; B and C in the Winter Springs area The ,overall arnoWlt of trips ' are correct wi~ v~ry sli~~~erences on both north-south and ~<lSt-west , , " ,"" ., , "" ".., , , screenlines.: As can be'seen from,,Fjgure:;6,'most:links in, the Winter Springs network had very " " acc~ptable assignment loadi?gs., " ' I I .: ..' ..;....:..:.,' ,', I I ',.:! -.. ::~:;::~ , " ,', I .'....... ..:....,:,....1. ....!. ..:.:.:~/:>..: . I ' ,,~:, ,,' :,,'. . . . ,1,1 ." 1.:i;ti~i~I~~I:::~~:;,~;, -25c ,:', , ! .,,:''''. ", '....,: 3' '.: ". "':' ;S',:::':.: . ' r .;-~~~~':',':;~~~i~\~~t~:~1W .... . -', ::: ''i ffi ~ TURJ"i LANE POLICY I LEFT nffiN LAliES. I ,1. ..'...:: .. . -.. :": ....,.. .. ~ ',7".." ......'.:iC!T .;,:;~~~~~?~~~ii~1;~'~q~,J;~.~'~~~;'~~;;:,~~fi~~'d5tniP~\.i. ," .." .. :':: .... .. :.. " ".. >. . .. '.. ~I'"": .. ".. .. ~;-: .. :.. ,; b. NuinberofL,~ft,TUinJvloverpentS"", " " ,': ,.. ,;:,; ~;:,":;.~i;ii:I~ ;::::'::,::~:;i;::j;;ii~:H1.~~.i" : ;,:,::;::;;':;A:t;:',i!:;)iQ,;j;~~i~~;i' '::"'{\ '.' ,',' ':, ">l!;,::';:i;:::::',:',,, \:)~i:"(;" ,', . ' " ,':,'"T' ,,' ..; r.:>,;:!>',On:'Iii.ultid,~e'f~~iliues>the::'num6e{af:Ieft furilln '": vehicles~,fr6in the ma. or /,";~T:,",i;C7~#y,~S4~1;;~~~~M~:%'~t15! d4ii e!th€ftl;;' "'-Mi;r p~ , ' peaK,hourofthe,ma].orstreee',I",,,,,,, ,': ,',.' " " , , ' ,,", ,~;,~::::;:;, :i:,':'~>;:;::,:']'t\:.:;;~~~;,}\:t:;: :,:,:;;:(,::~r.:~:':/i;~;\)i.,;~~ir~i;;:;,..:,,: ;..::,!/,',:;: ..',':::; '~~' ,:,', ;::'.. ::,'.: ,": '2~' . " ~'Oil tW6,:(2J'.lan:e:tv.r~waY:Ja~iijti'es~ th~'numbCt ofleft nirriing: vehicles from .. ..',.. ' :. ........... .. .... .. '1:..... .... .. ,.,......,:.. .. .. .. the ,major "roadway is:equat:toor greater than ten (fa) "and the opposing tbro,ugh',tr#pc vol~e'excee~,three htmdred and fifty (350):vehiclesduring , ,', e1thirthe,.A.M.or'P,M.peais"IlQur.d ", .. . <, ". ;:. - ':'::'~:': ::' .~':,':; :.: ',' :~. ::' ....", '~\\<::::'~~'t?)\:::, :::.~: ", ":" .;- '. Avml~ole Sight ,Distance ' c. I:, , " " I " If the'available sight distance: for le,ft tUnling vehicles to observe approaching traffic or for approa~hing traffic:IIi1oving ,in; either 'direction t() observe the left turning vehicle is lessthan the vahieshownin Table: A-I for the posted speed-oUhe major - . streeL ,d. Access Control 1. ,The ~~ee~ has ~e'e~ d,~~at~~, ~:, a' controlled ,acceSs facilitY by Seminole COUnty;,FDOT~ or 'the' City o('~iinter Sp~gs. ' :. ' :-:'" . 2. ' ' ,The roadway is a muiti':lane .diYicied facility ~d:there js sufficient rodm in th~ m:edian to aJlow constructi6Ii, of a left turn'l~e. ~ . .' , ~ '. .ih:,...:.....~! :~;''': . . \,' . it"-: e. Traffic Control., '". ..... ."' .' :....., : ::. ' " . '," .; '" ::' '-;" "'tJ;..oi;iit~!~\i:~,~:"~~':~~'>';:"" ~.' ",: ...i:, -',. '.~: :;.:....'. . ; The in~ec'tirig ~orstre'et' or ~c~:p.'6'lritdrive~y iseoritroUed'by a'traffic signal. . '". .." " ." " . .....;.~:'.-.~: .' . - . . . . . :~';.:,.,~:; .' :. . 2. Separate left. turn ,lanes, are required on th~:'.:~t,ersec'ting' minor streets' or 'access point driveways when anyOtwo (2) or more of the f<;>!16wing,\varrants are satisfied: .",' . '. ';';."':': ", . . ". ::':~:i~:::j :(!:(:; "': . IV ~ i :~;;::J.((,:'.,:':,', : :. . "':'>'::l:: .~. : :. ." , ' )i:~!il::(;- . , :::.d",':":'"",,;,'.,.,:.,i,::,,',,:,..',,':,',,,l"..~.,i"""_'"::,:,~,Vj,:,;,,,,~~i,',~.~t,,~,;,:i,':',,::~' : ': ;';:' ,,":i,~?C ~::.' . "" ,- ~ ~,. .1 . -. . ~ :'./~?f/~~>i:' . ;:1" n c:J =.. ~ I I I I , , .".. .. I I a. Posted Speed Limit When the posted speed limit of the interSecting street or access point driveway is equal to or greater than thirty (30) mph, ' . :;1 .~' b. Number ofTuming Vehicles c. . , ' "When the ~wnber of left turning vehi~!es' frolp'~e)#te~ting's:t.fe(:t, or, access pomt , driveway is equal to or greater' thaiiPsiXty (6q)\;~l#Cle:?:dtiring either'A.M: orP.M . '.' . " . ~ .,..,.,. " '., . . . . . . . peak hoUr of thearterial'sti-eet.' ",' " " ", ;', ','::' " , , , ....A ~aiJable. S,i.ghl.Di>tance.... ......... ....;~~{\t,:;i~~ii~~~;i,,':~:~'.i. Available sight distance is no(ari appHcible,:\Yarrant; iff this q,s'e. ',:~ : "" ' " " '," ':0:' ,,::'~, <t:~~::;::;'::::;;,;:~~t;~):>~:}/::~~f~~~d\ j" 0:.::',,;;, '..: ' , " , When the street which is,beirig. ei1t~ecl'haS: ~en:d.~if1l~'ie4as a controlled access ,'" facility by Seminole County, FDOT, or; the CityofWiDter Spf.ings.' .~-;... d. e. Traffic Control :'~'~ : .; '. .. . .' .' "" ":' ::.....,{: ,';:. .. ~'.:..;'."~~.;':~.\)'.~~.;:;::<~' .z....;:. ";::""":': ':, . ." . When,the mtersecting street'or acceSs poirit driveway is controlled by a traffic signal. '\. DECELERA nON AND RIGHT TIJRN LANES 1. A deceleration and right turn lane on the major street will be required when any two (2) or more of the following warrants are satisfied: "':' '--- '-'", - , a Posted major street speed limit is equal 'to or greater than forty (40) mph. b. Number of right turning movements from the major roadway is equal to or greater than thi.W (30) dwing either the A.M. or P.M. peak ho'ur of the inajOf street. c. A vaila,ble Sight Dist3.nce . . .' - .. If the available sight distance for a right turning vehicle ~o'be seen:by through traffic traveling in the same direction'is less than the valueshowri ill Table'!A-l' for the posted speed limit of the major street d. Major street bas been designated.as a c,ontrolled access facility by SeIninole C<;>UDty, FDOT, or the City of Winter SpringS~):: " " , ' , IV-IS ,. .:.....,. ". '-. . - . ;' .::.~:' ;.;.:: ;. ;~It;; : :. ~ I"' . .....'1. '._;', .;.. ~, ~,i 8 m i j " I ., .':1"' .'. I 2. . :,:,:,:.;'"~::, ',. . , c. d. e. , " '; e, Traffic Cootrol Intersecting street or a.cce.ss point driveway is controlled by'a traffic signal. '. '. . '" Separate right rum lanes are required 00 a min~r intersection 's:treetor: acce~s p6im driveway whenever any two (2) or more ofthe.follo~gwarr~,t5,are.s'a~sfie~:,:,,:,;;/:<.;,;),' , . '. .,'. . . :./~:>. ,:,:,1':,':. " . Posted ~ed limit of the,iiiters~cting or access 'polli :dri~'e'way i~;equa(to o~ greater' than ~ (j9}:~ph.': "", ',' '::'::' ':'~(:/" "':'~'::":/Wf/:Y~1r...";' ,:' ,,' a. b. , . .',., :. :..... . ",./: . '. . ". . . . ....1 - ,"j" . Number of right tumingvehicle.s from ~~,inte~,e,G~g,~~t?~ a~~:P.Bln(o/iveway is equal to,or ~teI: than sixty,(60) .duririg eithel<th~!Ni10tor.P;M~'i)~~iK'hour oftbe:,:': ::a:::~t-Lisn~t:2~EbJ~1~i!^t1;~~~!~(:i[I,,;:f"> -~:,.,;: Access Control , ':'!. :",', . ',",' If the arterial street which is being entered, has, been designated as a controlled access facility by Seminole County, FDOT, or,the'Cicy;,of.WwtetSpnngs>", ",' . .' " .' .' '. . - . ~.,:: .:. ": ':':',i"';.-.; :;. . '. '. \' Traffi~Control , .. \ I. Intersecting street or access point driveway is controlled by a traffic signal. 2. An acceleration lane is provided on the arterial street and tile'-right tfiin movement is not controlled by a yield or stop sign. ,. rv-16" .,f((:jr .:;;,;...... ',,' "';"::',:P:;," .~" .::~.;tf.::'\' rn t.ij ~ U I g I I I .'........ . h . .... " " " ; .: i;~. '~:.\:'.'. ." .. :';';i . ". "'f); " 'TAB'LE 20" SIGHT DISTANGE FOR TURN,:LANEp'O~ICY (Rounded 'Values) . '", . . : " ", I 20, 30 125 200 200 250 '.:;.", ," . ".: (~:~~~t!.:. :;;:: ';',: ;'..:~~.t.;~.. ..:"'~ . . , ." . : .'.!~ :;:.:. ...:.. . ~ :..;" , ';.:,';;:';<..... .' ';n!j~;;:::,\~~~~~};~']',:'i' . .. ...~~ ' ""," 4'()' '.. "'.-;"'50:.."" """'.."6<(::"" ,:,,-. .. ,.' ,',' , ' '" ,,:::: ,,;:,:~,\j:L:: ,:,:" ',~, .:~:,,~,<,~.,.~.,.:.,;:/,::'~:~}.:~~ 275 ,<"~~;~,, ~~~~~l~, ..., .'f 375 " 475 ";-650::;' ' .. POSTED SPEED (1\1PH) , STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE Minimum (FT) Desirable (FT) I -, , " " ,. '----- :::)~~~~ rv - 1 7 ,. "... ". ',' ~ ~ Ii II ~ 1'1 I\iliI - ii i I I I I I I I ..:.... ..... " .~~:.,,::~,: " ',,:),::;-, :. ~".' " . ;.~ APPENDIX' :..~.~..': , '. ..... ---- ,. ..~':'.::' "u':: ~-: i.~'j~.~:;~~~" '. : :..:~(;:.~.'.;:..:'. ..:- ::- - - ~ ,-.. , I!IlBl ~ TABLE A-1 , CITY OF WINTER SPRIN~S PUBLIC WORKS. LOCAL OPTION GAS TAX .:. ~.< ....... ... . . . . . . ~. .' ..! PROPOSED PROJECT EXPENDITURES BY YEAR i; ;! , Project Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year4 Year 5 Tolal Prior Project Name Number : 97/98 98/99 99/00 00/01 ,01/02 Wagners' Curve Removal 97.-4411-062 $80 000 " , " " $80 000 Public Works Compound 99-4411.063 $60 000 $60 000 $60 000 $60 000 ' $240000 Resurfacing 98-4411"'()64 $150000 $150,000 ,$150000 $150000 $150,000 $750 000 Underdrains 98-441 ~065 $50 000 $50 000 $50,000 $150000 TOTAL I $280 000 $210000 $260 000 $210000 $260,000 $1 220000 SO I PROPOSED PROJECT REVENUE SOURCE BY YEAR Project Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year4 Year 5 Tolal Prior Revenue Source Number 97/98 98/99 99/00 00/01 01/02 Local Option Gas Tax 97 -4411.062 $80 000 $80 000 Local Opllan Gas Tax 99-4411-063 $60 OOP, $60 000 $60 000 $60 000 $240 000 Local Oplion Gas Tax 98-4411-064 $150000 $150000 $150000 $150000 $150,000 $7 SO 000 Local Oplion Gas Tax 98-4411-065 $50 000 $50 000 $50,000 $150000 TOTAL $280 000 $210,000 $260 000 $210000 $260,000 $1)20000 SO PROPOSED EQUIPMENT EXPENDITURES BY YEAR Project I Year 1 Year2 Year 3 Year4 Year 5 Tolal Prior Equipmenl Name Number 97/98 ' 98/99 99/00 00/01 '01/02 Vehicle 98-4411.066 $26 000 $20,500 $2,1' 000 $67 500 TOTAL $26 000 $20 500 $0' $21 000 $0 $67 500 SO PRO'POSE~ EQUIPMENT REVENUE SOURCE BY YEAR Prolec~ Year 1 Year2 Year 3 ' Year"4 .Y~ar.5 Total Prior Revenue Source Number .: 97/98 98/99 . 99/00 00/01. ,01102 Local Option Gas Tax 98-4411..066 $26.000 $20 500 $21,000 $67 500 TOT AL " $26,000 $20 500 $0 $21,000 $0 $67 500 $0 J "', t!IEll Iill?J . . !oo: : ~l FY 91 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT FUND ACTUAL REVENUES: INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUES INTEREST MISC ELLANEOUS TOTAL REVENUES PERCENT INCREASE , .,. ~ ~. r.... R~CURRING EXPENSES: R!:CURRING CAPITAl OUTLAY TOTAL EXPENSES PERCENT INCREASE REvENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENSES eEGlrmlNG FUND BALANCE =,'~~ING FUND BALANCE ". $268,779 '$35,-483 $0 $30-4,262 5.H% $30,073 $165,872 $195,9~5 3.7~'10 $108,317 $505,352 $613669 FY 92 ACTUAL $2~5,312 $31.~27 '\ $0 S276,739 .9,05% $19,901 $366,256 $386,157 97.07% (5109,~18) 5613,669 $50~,251 TABLE A-2 - - CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS LOCAL OPTION GAS TAX Historical Data FY' 93 ACTUAL S23 7,753 SI3,261 SO S251,Ol~ -9.30'10 $2~,913 5228,259 S253,172 -3~ .~~'Io ($2,158) 5504,251 S502,093 FY 9~ ACTUAL 5205,765 $26,60~ SO $232,369 .7,~3% . $28,556 528,556 -a 8.72 ';. $203,813 5502,093 $705,906 , , I , FY95 ACTUAL S221,816 /130,~51 $0 S252,267 8.56% 596,Q28 50,_ 5355,1<47 5~51,175 1 H9.97% ($ 198,908) 5705,906 $506,998 FY96 ACTUAL 522-4,256 517,000 50 52-41,256 --4.36% S197,500 S3-4-4,80~ 55~2,30~ 20.20% ($301,O~8) 5506,998 5205,950 ~ - ;: FY,97 BUDGET ~ , lIJZDll Im& ~ rmm FY 98 FY 99 FY 2000 PROJECTION PROJECTION PROJECTION S2-45,6-4-4 $25,000 SO S270,6-4-4 10,11% : $50,000 5258,050 $308,050 .0.20'11. (537,~06) 5205,950 S168,5H S257,926 520,000 50 S277,926 -4.62% S75,OOO 5250,000 $325,000 5.50';' (H7,07~) 5168,5~~ S121,HO $270,822 $ 20,000 SO 5290,822 ~.6~'10 $15.000 $200,000 $275.000 .15.38'/, $ 15.822 $121.00 $13 7.292 S2sqs) 520,000 SO DoqS) CSS'/, S 7 5,000 S 200.000 S 27 5,000 0,00./, S(9)6) SI)7,292 S 166.6SS ,~~:l!l'~: :1;; i~~:l~:~;;:;h;,::i;,r..""" ,:::: ':"',' -::.'"'" :~I:I'lin I :, ""..\>.l';":"'~"..",,,..:, , ,', ~".~~~~i~I\'II' I .~~.;,:.:~:t';:"~:,.':.:" .' . ,,'.,.' ." . '!' "II ~ ,j ...,.~-.. ,.'.. .,. ,~ Il:I-~ I 'I '~i\;~V",r.'.'~" :'_~f .' .- .)~, Pol:. t'- ,t r... Y.~.t. ;'. '" .s~!~I~I..lt: I. ~~~"::'"'' . . ~~~~~t!ll;t~~:: ~:;:~', ...",' _' , ,..",3.1l..." ,':' '" "'~.~~:J';.:':~:~..' . .."..lt~"~;T',I..l ".... . ..~:1i!::!li';:~::''{' ',: , : ~: . -- ~ c.. ~. .:... '. ...- .:.-.... .. , - , . .t_,.. - TABLE A-3 ", CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE FUND FROM ANNUAL AUDIT Revenues: Taxes Fees' Intergovern~enlal revenues Fines and forfeitures Interest Miscellaneous Total revenues FY 93/94 Actual /' $571,213 $32,495 $603,708 Expenditures: Current General government Public safety Transportation CapltalouUay . Total expenditures $10,444 $107,297 $117,741 ' Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures $485,967 Other FinancIng Sources (Uses): Operallng transfers In Operating transfers out Total other financing sources (uses) Excess oJ Revenues and Other Financing Sources Over (Under) ,Expenditures and Other Uses $485,967 i .. .' , Fund Balances, October 1, 1993/J4 $1,109,406 Fund ~alances, September 30, 1994/95 $1,595,373 .~. _.'. " .. ~i'.... . "- ... . ". '. - ." ~ ~ --- .. (: /, ' FY 94/95 Actual $278,084 $79,851 $357,935 $290, $78,792 $79,082 $278,853 $278,853 $1,595,373 $1,874,226 tm!!:i3 @:m '-;, '.", .':~~r 'f'1.j N. ..~C :".loo.a..;.,""'~ ....t..-~..:..,.......'l... '.._.. ....._. .. '.-. '- ...,- --- ..11.11 liiiiiilii(',7:,:' i 1111 ii(',,~ III III ! : 1,Il :~I!I 1lBII' ~ mE Em'21 t ,ii :'il ili iiJ~:I~~ ~1~C~f~~;(:~;.;';' 't);',;:'..." .' . .."... ....-;h~f.""':~~~~~~,;:,,r,'1"... ~, 'Ii ; ':! :iJ.j!!~j~~: ~f'7"'''~F~~1; ~",i,,:, · '.. T AS LE A.4 " . ..,... , --~, "'!",:':"'~" ......, cj~NYA, '~FB~,b~TE~,R F7~,~,~.,~1,,~:.':',~, :,'88, ./,:,.,,:.,i,0;',:,,}',t ... ~i~i:~;ji~~!(:?~'. .,.. .' " ..' .... .' REVETNR~ENSS~~~;~~gl~~~~~~~~;~;ITED) 'i. '.:.)'.'~'i'" Description of Revenue TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE FUND Impact Fees Collected . . Interest Earned Amended "To Dale FY 95/96 : FY 96/97 FY 96/97 Actual " BUdget Actual $282,993, $310,436 $158,121 $91,583 ' $50,900 $39,903 $374,576, $36L336 $198,024 $0 $1,470,164 $268,765 $374,576 $1,831,500 $466,7 89 '1 ,/ TOTAL TRANSP, IMPACT FEE REVENUE APPROPRIATION FROM FUND BALANCE TOTAL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE REVENUES ::.. AND APPROPRIATION FROM FUND BALANCE ~ ~, Account No. Description of Expenditure ~ TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE FUND 53180 Consulllng Services 54620 Slgnalizallon 56310 Capllallmprovemenl~ 56930 Reserves $92,613 $107!000 $77,111 $0 ' $21,000 $0 $0' $1,703,500 $399,678 $0 $0 SO $92,613 $1,831,500 $466,789 $281,963 $0 $0 $374,576 $1,831,500 $466,789 TOTAL EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATION TO FUND BALANCE TOTAL EXPENSE AND APPROPRIATION TO FUND BALANCE CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE , FUND BALANCE - O!:tober 1,', Approprlalfons to (from) Fund Balance $1,874,226 $2,156,189 $2,156,189 $281,963 ($1,470,164) ($268,765) $2,156,189 '.' $686,025 $1,887,424 FUND BALANCE - Sept~m.~er 30~. . To Date : 4/15/97 , , I i "', TAULE A-5 .!, 1JI:!~I:,I,,:',: .liIi( t iii,' !ii~;r},~~,i{,:lf"; y"Jl::.'A ........ . ....:",,:~\~:,; ". .' . '.:. '" ..,.:;,,~;~jJt. ".'_' .' ~ · ,:! . i !iN[~i;Yi,.;q; .e .">j:}::,~t'QotQI:)~(~~fJ6City of Win ler Springs Exi sling" S()i;jp~cQn om j cs Data ~i!i,ili!!:,'I.llrfrl~1 ,;i~i;~~rf~,;;;on:~':"~~i~g';"M~~~~~~'~' . I;J~~:~~I. cO~~~~~lar .... ....~:;i6f;Ui~~~~~eJ,':. E~~~~~nl 'i,J',i""':i;'Hii"',,,;o;i"-'J-TraItlCZone .'.', FamllDU 'DU Em 10 men! Em 10 men! Em 10 men!"., .' , K.8 ~~~lil!~t;~~;1';:1;:i~ i~f g g r;~"~)r:J . :~ 1m g g 1 o~ . ..~g.~i," i ~f:; 780 120 0 10 / 0 10 20 781 940 '1 0 0 30 0' 30 782 129 0 0 0 , 0 0 84 44 0 72 0 67' 139 783 '243 388 166 10 54 230 85 O' 0 0 26 0 26 86 3 0 0 0 0 0 785 25 0 0 54 0 54 87 97 0 0 6 72 ' 78 786 473 0 0 0 0 0 787 370 0 0 0 0 0 88 20 0 0 0 11 ' 11 788 ,477 0 0 0 0 0 789 103 0 0 0 0 0 89 156 0 0 3 8 11 90 359 0 0 11 55 66 790 441 32 0 40 0 40 791 227 157 0 0 0 0 91 955 40 0 96 0 96 92 633 392 6 124 304 434 93 2 P 412 8 27 447 94 449 622 1340 '531 56,8 2439 95' 327 796 110 227 457 . 794 82 83 ~ rs 84 a. ~, x I 85 V' 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 TOT AlS: 8897 2427 1279 2116 r f , 5073 1678 o o o 0, o o o o o o 2450' o o o o o o o o o o o o o 1200 o o 815 o 4465 - ~ t@IJ School Enrollment 9-12 2715 27'15 I , .,,' ,..,t ~11\i1!-'1m~~~ II , , . I r<r~.f ..\j..., U t-H , U (~, , " .,~QHI U 1!~~~lllmuBm,;~ ...: '.,~' :i1":!l~%'!.ll~ lW . . ". , :; :!,zo'6ii, :b~l!lSefue ~1~1i efilj' .. ~a' ~ebm:: " '" ,. <: ~:j~;~i::~;i ' . :.~.f' ,:' <:i I~~~*~1f~~~)I\ ~,Jt41' . ~ 'W ~ f~\1@W~ ~ ~iiffi t~ . ..It r ~\ ~~..~~ l::'w. ..;~~~~~~~~~ b..: . ...... .......... m:ll 53 Georgetown Unlls 1,2 & 3 214 I j a3 Tusca Oaks 136 i aj WedQewood Tennis Villas 233 I 583 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I as St. Johns Landlnq 10 21 as McOonalds 1 I as Schrimsher Town Center 113 448 56 Acres , 10 0 1 0 134 448 56Acres 0 I 785 W.S. Municipal Bulldlno 1 I 785 W.S. Hioh School 1 785 Bills Landscaping 1 i 785 KinQsburv Tract 1 27 Acres \ 785 BlumberQ Tract 1 10 Acres i85 Central Winds Park 1 I 2 " 0 4 0 .- 0 0 37 Acres 0 i 780 Arbor Glen 38 I 780 Tuscawilla Unit 6 89 i 780 SI. Stephens 1 , 780 Kinder Care 1 I 780 Seven-Eleven 1 780 Tuscawilla Realty 1 780 Tuscawilla Office Comolex 127 0 4 0, 0 0 0 0 781 Tuscawilla Unit 1 111 781 Tuscawllla Unit 2 65 781 Tuscawllla Unit 4 379 I 781 Wedoewood Units 1,2,& 3 128 I 7a1 Country Club Vlllaqe 1,2, & 3 245 i 781 Arrowhead Unit 2 23 5 I 781 Arrowhead Unit 1 . (PartlaD 6 2 781 Tuscawilla Country Club 1 ,- 957 0 1 0 7 0 0 0 I 782 Winter Springs Unit 3 129 129 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i 786 Oak Forest Unit 1 114 ... " iaa Oak Forest Unit 2,2A & 2B 163 i8S Oak Forest Unit 3 120 788 Oak Forest Unit 4 75 ! i85 Tuscawilla Unit 5 10 I 788 Grand Reserve 14 2 I i 496 I I 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 I f ... 12/07/1999 Page 2 or 6 - ---~l_'- i " .:._..:::.~ ,~~H~~~~1:: ~.Jmr-<< ~ . f '.," ~ ':.'" ;' ....ui~~~.. ~.. ~ ,. .': _1 ~ "tW~~~~~;;~i "",,,,,,,,,,,,"~,, " , ~ ,Llilm,-t4Al, ., .,n..... JI." ,lWlIl , , . ~ A "lit ~ , :~:i~~oilN:,el~veJ~p:m~~~~ . ~j u .. I' '<<!1l1~ y , . > : ~ :ii:l ! . '::;:i~: i~~~~~~~\'~~"~~:~~~~~ ~ ( ~. ~~.: ~.. ~~ , ::.=.. ':"::i: ;im:~~~~~~;j,~~~lW~~ , I, Jl.. I':' ,t;t\\~'Wl , ' ~,m\ : ?55 Oak FOI:estUnii 5 lots 468 to 561 94 '........ , . ,.- , . i 786 Ollk Forest Unit 6 lots 562 to 71Sf 154 765 0. k Forest Unit 7 716 to 808) 93 , , 765 Oak Forest Unit 8 lots 809 to 940) 132 i i 473 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 87 L.D. Plante (unincorporated) I 87 Winter Springs Post Office 1 ! 87 Seminole Pines 102 100 I i 87 WindinQ Hollow (east of Easement) 51 12 \ , 153 0 1 0 112 0 0 0 \ 787 Winding Hollow 330 6 I 757 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 9 " 109 I 787 North Orlando Ranches See, 10 112 , 787 Slone Gable 50 '\ 787 Slone Gable Commercial 0.5 acres 601 0 0 0 6 0 0.5 acres 0 I I 90 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 2 52 90 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 2A 196 I 90 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 5 22 3 1 I 90 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 8 72 90 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 1 (Par1 14 3 I 90 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 4 (Par1 4 . 3 ! 360 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 I I 58 Seville Chase 91 19 88 Dunmar Estates 20 111 0 0 0 19 0 0, 0 I i91 Mosswood Apartments 147 791 Moss Glen Townhomes 10 I 791 The Vineyards , 171 791 The Seasons 141 791 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 4 (Pan 5 2 791 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 1lPan ' 25 5 342 157 0 0 7 0 0 0 f .., 12/0711999 Page 3 or 6 ~::,.,~i;~'i~. .,! r- ; S'I:';~;8ri'i::i:'~" Ii I "eDf.~ l' i . ..'::~'..,;.::-~'i :II:~ ::~~~~: ;i~ ~': : '~~~\:,~ \ ~ I :::::;'.,:~,,:::;:~::;: :1:lm1~: il i: : :~N::l;! t : . ..:...;.'.\>...,..;..;.:.;.::;.:;.:,',:.'......":,'~ :': :>>.'.~~~ ,: :~"'" ;'7!;O-'''} ;:i,d :;..i:l. :vma: I' j'''-'- l----nw- Pfim;C;;:~r Ten ;~:e I 790 State F~;'1m Ins ~ 'ance I 790 Cumberland Fa~ms 91 9i , Walden Terrace I North Orlando 2nd Addition Garden Club Apartments N.O, Terrace Section 1 N.O. Terrace Section 2 N.O. Terrace Section 3 N.O, Terrace Section 4 N.O. Terrace Section 5 N.O. Terrace Section 6 N,O. Terrace Section 8 N.O. Terrace Section 9 Foxmoor Unit 1 Foxmoor Unit 2 Foxmoor Unit 3 Foxmoor East North Orlando Ranches Sec. 3 Winter SprlnQs Elementary Waloreens Dr. Martins Winter Sorlnos Food/Used Appliances Cahill Property The Atrium Winter Sorlnos Plaza Winter SprlnQs Vet Storaoe World 0' _I c. -' 51 91 9., 9~ 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 '.. 12/07/1999 ~(\ ~ .'---'~' ~. .. .~ ,,'" .. 't'''~fcl '~=C~a">.11J:1;~~n" ~~fflr" , ~~ ,l~ ,.~, ~ ~l ,~~ . !ll... ~ :. I .!~~~lI~i ~. aHa , J~)ffi~$;~~~ 4<i1 - 32 441 32 63 HO 40 64 41 77 72 45 ." 48 64 58 84 2 104 31 36 959 40 I , I 1 2 '3 o 1 1 1 2 1 1 7 o Page 4 of 6 ~11~lmr.~I~' 6 6 3 3 ~ ..'~ .' ~, o o , il A~:f.\l;:"':lll~l;:l~ll~~::;:.m::~.;:r . ~. ~.f~:&:'UU ~::~::~m'~~~~:::~<:~~:~:!'. ~!~ll~~l!![!~; o 0 o o :' '.: :1,: i ; ~ : ' : ~ I s~,~zo!1d:'d:n:,!;;~i,i:: I ~j . . :>.!:-J tW:~U ::~ ~~ ~ t::l: 1n i H .",.,,,,,,. -' ..." ""..., :!::: l-liqI1Iilll'I:I:;,::I:1 ,,'I NO:'irlu~i(:i;:i iii',::: .,.", ..- .------.-.... NOI1h Ol'li:lt1dl: 1s1 Addil/on North 6fiiin;j;; 4th Addition North Orl,:t1c~1 5th Addition (partial) North Cirla riCk, 8th Addition Lori Ann Acr~s Doug's 'Unit ,~) Moss Road Quads Indian Rldqe Deer Sonq Fainax Apartment's la Petite Nursery Mr, Bubbles Car Wash Dr. Pete Corum Ban(jeld Funeral Home Excelsior Park Winter SprinQs Center Barnett Bank VillaQe Market Place Aulomotive One Circle K Public WorKs Complex Fire Station Public Safety Complex I I I I : i I I \ \ i, i I 1 ! i I I i I I I I. i- I I f 1 I , 1- i i _ i i 92 o~ w{ 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 c~ -" 92 n c~ w"' 92 92 93 Winler Springs Industrial Park 93 Broadway Gymnastics ql!i!!II:; Ili!I!!l::I!!, .! I', " " , , 'II I i ~ ! ! II ~ : I : l! ;! !, !I ~ ~ ! !,I:, 1" ,d ;!! l~li!I!:! 'it' i !,!,I :: ,:: '''' .I!;I:I,::iNj:idHii~,:,ilij Hi!, '''i::,if'''''''''''' ..",,,...,,,,,,,,,,, .."" , 1:fl 1 :liEl 2.J~! 34 22 633 o 102 41 75 57 8 , 62 i 74 41 94 Highlands Section 1 94 Highlands Section 2 9< Highlands Section 4 9< Highlands Section 7 & 8 94 Highlands (Blades Court) 94 Highlands East Quadraplxes 94 Highlands Patio Homes 94 Cypress Club g~ Cypress VillaQ,e 94 Sheoah Section 2 ~< Sheoah Section 3 94 Highland Village One g~ Highland Village Two 9< Highland Lakes 9< Highlands Elementary School 9< '. Baytree 94 The Oaks (credits owed) . "1"1 111'\1'\1"1 64 56 20 84 152 16 .. 392 o 16 25 75 22 144 28 19 479 492 182 ! I .i:!!!,! Iii, iH. , 1 1 1 1 33 1 1 1 1 1 1 43 o ( I , I' ! ii " 'I 1,1, i1. 1.1,111,: :i:: 'I~ f 'I: ~: ",,1..1.,1 r , ; ::: ~ ; :!: ~~:,::,!, o o '8 1 ['l ~o.: 't: 9 " I~l'~ 1'.rlMI11 'ill.' ~'\. ,,~ ~".' i'll~~:!,,1 .' i'. .,t"IM1 11l:~ .1 i ' i :b[t~II!'1 I. II ~!~:~! ~!. :~~~:l' !!t~.t :;; :~i l !!:~~t .~.<lll,., :1.:. . . ~~)~~~~ .;h.' "~~,, l: 'il"l' " "I" ......\..,.~".. ; ,,:li~: ~ : :hl i!,," J!H~,~lil",: J I: I~I' " . :\<~m;:~~~J. ""...." "." . ''''.''..__'OI'''''~I' 111.111.___ I , : o o o o o o o o o o o . ~;::~%on'C"j ,~II! ;'I::lj,'lili. Hi !. ',"::{PJ :j~~~:~:!!:~:H!!l! ~i!!!: . .. j 9S SlWCIM .;i!:l: A I 95 Gc~[j~;nii(~i;-;~partments I 9S ~Vildwc;ocr"- ! S5 Seville on' the Green ! 95 Greenspoint ~5 Highlands~ Section 5 95, Winter SprinCls Golf Course 95 Highlands Glen I 95 Sheoah Sec. 1 95 Golfside Villas 95 Kia/Mitsubishi ! , ! 3S North Orlando Ranches Sec. 1 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 1A &1 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 6 North Orlando Ranches See 7 \ \ I , I a9 39 i76 iie 776 Morse Sprinas UindinQ Ca scells 71 Schrimsher Cascells 7 i 765 . ~ - :_':J :55 31umberQ Kingsbury Parker 35 Parkstone P2rkstone Commercial Seminole County Facilities Maint. I I I TOTALS ", 12/07/1999 ~ I '" ~ I : '"i I' "....1 " II' , \ l r ~'1 I,' l ' I: ! :!:! ,,! Ji!L! '120 111 41 29 44 345 15 55 37 43 '\ 150 o 60 o 210 o o o 9963 I, "I"l"" I:"", ,. ,11.1:,,11: '!1 ,I ~ ~ ,::~.r: :. '\~:' '~I , 11:' fl "I'" : II ~': 1 !~ gn~!1L,~!; j:~~:~,~ ~! .!Ifl e'iin 1~i~i) 200 1046 o o o o 2806 iJ!t I',!,', 'i 'i, il", ,I., : ,j" 1'1 I qUI ,Ii 1,,",1 P"I il',:I:: 1", p: ,I I P.I'I' I! :1,; : ','.. ,!:IiJ: ". ,h. ut: .!..l!:!ijl~!li,:;i:!;l!:,..1 ;! i!!:L,,!i ,!i: :. .;,:: . . I~ o o o o o o o o 68 1 , r i Page e of'6 5 5 3 3 2 3 11 206 o 217 270 270 o 120 120 36 36 353 353 1062 923 20 20 o o d~ , td j ll,: 'ti ~, ~,~ ' ~ 'I o 67.5 acres 67.5 acres 46,6 acres 30 acres 76.6 acres 15 acres 15 acres 19 acres 49 acres 13.7 acres 13.7 acres 320.6 acres .; .", ". ""'.n.'..",......... !i W; Fmi'r;;j:l~m . ::! f ,:h~:<(:(iW~~~~~~ n" ~~~!:LH~g~~~@1M o o o o o o N9'l4~,)L!Oll' Cl.-IANGE 'TO I',,,.,.' " . '~<IU1'E',MAPS AND TEX'T TRAF'f~'C'~IRCULATION ELEMENT O~:= THE C:ITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COM-,'::~. . ..... ....,: ", PREHENSIVE PLAN ' ,::: . , 'NOTICE IS.'HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE LOCAl:: :PL'A:NNrNG, 'AGENCY OF THE CITY OF WINTE1t; ........... ",,":. " ~_.I ',SPRINGS WILL HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING ON p...; .' ,:~;.r;~G,E SCALE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMEND~ ': \.:~@ PROPOSAL TO COMPLETELY REPLACE TH!-$ ':'TEX-T AND MAPS OF THE TRAFFIC CIRCULATION-:;> . 'ELEMENT IN VOLUME 1 OF 2 AND 2 OF 2 OFTI-Iet , CrrY:':S'COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WITH THE PRoi;~ . .,.;,.,..' I'. . lit' ,::pOSEb'TEX1AND MAPS. ,': . ~;~.: ~ ll.D F1Il . fOIl ,',THESE PUBLI~,)IEARINGS WILL TAKE PLACe I\; "CITY HALL, q26 EAST STATE ROAD 434, WINTE SPRINGS, FLQRIDA. INTERESTED PERSONS MA :,AITEND AND BE HEARD. , ,:A P:tmLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED LARG:: , .. SC~E COMPImHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT B. . , : ':11IELOCAL '~~ANNING AGENCY WILL BE HEL ',' :' : ;,,::ON dtTOBER>25. 2000 AT 7:00 P.M. A PI " ,,' ~J.',...' " .. 1".1ft . - , ;(TRAN8MIITA,:ft).-P'4'BLIC HEARING ON THE PR , ,'POSEp:"~ARGlri'SCALE COMPREHENSIYE PL : :.~frAME~MENT"WILL 'BE HELD BY THE CITY-CO , i;~SSION ON NQVEMBER 13, 2000 AT 6:30 P.M. :'....\" .',. . , ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO T "'ABOVE MAY,:S'E OBTAINED FRQM THE CIT . "," . '-- -'. . . ',CLERICS OFFICE AT 1126 EAST STATE ROAD 43 , WIN1ER, SPRINGS. FLORIDA. FOR MORE INFO '- .' ....1... ': . , MATIQ.:N,;GALL .(407) 327-1800 #227. PERSO' , ',-wriit::pI$ABit'i1;'1Es NEEDING ASSISTANCE "Ii , . .' ,.....-...;.. .... . " . ,;~:PARTIGIPATE 'IN 'ANY OF THESE PROCEEDIN :', ;i~SHOULD;'CONTAcr THE EMPJ,.OYEE RELATIO ,.N.... ." .' . .: .,j~DEPA~TMENT<;S:OORDINAT(jR, ,48 Ho.URS ::';:'~KDVANCE';' 0F :'TIm MEETING AT (407) 327-18 '. ,~ : ~#2,.3~{ftt:w~JB)\ PpBLIC HEA~G. I,F:YOV DE'~D., , , :~'TO"APPEAL~ANY' RECOMMENDATIONIDECISIQ '~~~MAD.J1\BY'::THE-'~LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY 0 ','ltI1i,~p~~~ION,WITH RESPEct T<?,ANY:".. ' , ';:7WER'!g~~Sp)ERED "AT THIS MEETING;:~YOU WIL ': i~~~~:2!Jf~~~~;~co~"6F\ t~E PROCEEDIl'lOS", ~'. ,',' ) ~J:191,{}~,M~~",'P.ORPOSES;, YO~, MAY ;~~,ED:,-T~ , ;:~ENSl:JRE'iHAT A VERBATIM RECORD OFTHE PRe :;;,:CEEDn~fG$'IS MADE UPON WHICH THE APPE'AL 10- :; :<~cJO BE:llASE~ ' .:. "', '. . .... . :-t:.., '.. . ~, " i;J..:'" , ' ;'.'::,'; D1U:A LO LUACr:.s '. .' ........ ........ #.#,.. .... . . '.' .' ~ . . ~" -C'" ~ - ~l S^TURD^Y, OCTOGER 1~, 2002 ___ -~"..-- _~ __, I V~!.!!II.!<!\.~t(;~(Q~\I..Q.!S.~ -... _ .. . I ..._. .~.-._- - ....- r: --~. ~~" ~ #G:J.~~:' .,~. .... ..._ _ .#. . . .. .' .ut _; __" ~ -;;;:,-';1, . :t''':~r.,,,,,;~),':J~'~!'':'':'''';"'~' '. ..~. . - -- ~ .....'~',."....' ..~"_.."~~~'~:,~~.." - "'~m' :"('~;~~'. ',:. ~ rm.n ,'~~\~i~i~t:,/~:,:~:J:~/q~::C, " :~;r~~~~~":'::';':: :' .~' . ....: .... . ~ '..:" .: . ..;: . .. . " '.... ....... ..... , . ":..' TABLE A-6 . . ..., . . 't.-,:.;" '. '.~~.. /~tr;' .' ;'.''. .. .... , .':;:- ". . .":," { Cl. ><' b- , , ..'." 'City of Winter Springs 2010 Socioeconomic:s Dat~:.P.r.?jections .. . " ';i. " Semlno/e ' Subzone Existing Existing Existing Existing Existing, " Total School School .',' ,County , $Ingle Multl.Famlly , Industrial Comm,erclal Service ' ,r:mployment Enrollment Enrollment Traffic Zone FamllvDU DU Employment Employment Employment K.8 9-12 . : .' I 100 o ,)\:: 100 70 . 71 62 0 100 0 .:':. 776' 118 40 0 100 o ':: 100' 0 72 72 346 0 0 640 0.., 1328 0 , 778 '468' 0 0 0 30 . 30, 0 82 82 1371 16 0 9 '30 ' 39 0 83 83 585 0 0 / , 104 0 104 0 780 127 '\ 0 15 0 325 340 0 781 1031 0 0 30 0 30 0 782 129 0 0 0 0 0, 0 84 84 92 0 72 " 0 67, 139 0 783 243 460 166 10 54 230 2458 85 85 31 ' 0 26 ,1080 72 1178 0 86 86 89 140 12 100 0 112 0 785 107 106 0 54 0 54 0 2715 87 87 260 0 0 6 11 17 0 786 473 0 0 0' 0 0 0 787 557 0 161 0 11 172 0 88 88, 130 0 0 0 8 8 0 788 498 0 0 0 0 0 '0 789 103 0 0 0 0 0 0 89 89 170 0 0 0 8 8 0 90 90 370 0 0 11 55 66 0 790 447 32 0 63 0 63 0 791 349 157 0 0 0 0 0 91 91 962 40 86 9~ 65 182 1200 92 92 633 392 213 124 369 706 0 93 93 2 .0 1344 8 27 1379 0 94 94 461 622 1340 531 ,568 2439 1000 95 95 350 1066 695 227 457 1379 0 TOT ALS: 10564 i 3171 4130 3293 2157 10203 4658 2715 " , f . . .~~~:'. :!:::."~: . :' :.:;:'~;~:/.{:~\:.;,." '. " ',~;r1;~,(-:~;,,"., , ..~ ',' :';. . , .' . .... ~ m - m m , ",::;;,1;"" ~ "oj' . ..~: . -.: :=. . :-- , . .~, .~. 'oJ: _:" . ".;:::;:;::,:,;, ' , . ',', "P'l' "..' . D ' :' ',,',: 4inInng ata ',' ',~ io'~~ (Figur~ 4) = ' ,;' ~;j,':\ ',;:' '~ ~:'iJJ~al~~~fi~ . .... . ". .. 778 82 ,83 780 781 782 84 783 85 86 785 87 786 787 ,88 788 -,-"'789 89 90 790 791 . 91 92 93 94 95 " l' ".': . '. ,; ',.' ...... -. " '.~ " - :':}!~;~~~!;\;i[:.j;, ,,',,:, _ _ ___ ___,,'n._ ..r.-." -,' ~', " '. ,=--~~~;~~,'=~:~'~.~:!i;i:1fit!~:!\~~;z';:t, ~,:' ~~~. ~~~~~~~ti~t;:~~e~~;~~~;;~~~~~:/ ~-;- ~~---;.I[~-,t(::.-;-:.-::-~~.~,.!' "1;.,"- .:~~.' ;,:-',.~":"';.'~'" ...... - TABLE A-7 WINTER SPRINGS TRAmC ZONE CONVERSION INDEX Assignment Zone ,. ,'<)50' ,.150 ' "1'48 149 97 98 147 96 ,,' ",,1.90 " '151 146 152 187 192 153'" '-- 191 144 99 100 46 45- 143 6". 14 3 4 5 1 2 Appcndix-7 . :,'::-. ,. i 1 t..- r 1i " 01.:,'.. ,::, l,i;.-":"'~,l: ,'" t';~~ ~ " ,.,,:' o o Ii' " d ,', SEE FIGtJRE 4 ',lJ // / ( ~ a 0 l , ,',':', " " : " 1:~~:Xfl~:' .;:\'~, ;~/";;'l:l~,~:~(b ~_ ....,.~.. ~'l. ......~...~._ '",!". ~.~ ....,.... .-s... ~ ,c:~ :/,:..~~ ,J'i~:,;lW ':', , ,,( . 1..: ';.!.~.~' r ...., .l" ".." ~'..> WINTER SPRINGS ZONES { .~! iJ-' ~~~:';j~: 1 ":~\~:.~:::;' " ':. :i I,::(,Af';' " - .' .. .'... 'I,. :, .J1-.J1ff- o <551 CJ 48 j 62 50 MICRO-ZONE SYSTEM FIGURE A:'1 ,. .I\n,.".!,,~;''''-.'\ 'HE! I i :;~,~~'~;~::'~~.:~~"~,"'~"""~~::~",~,.'..~~I~.'~~~:~":,,'~"'II~ ~. ,;ii!;i ,; i :i,: ;:;U"-- ,~~~~ '~I.' J.' ,I, ::" ~ "I"" . " . t'l !,1111' "I , JI '1 :1'1 ii.'i;'l'l'I! .' ",.':' .~: $, i!I~;: .::" ',: ~;~ .~ ~~ ,lid 11.,ld .1'~I; 'il'l, ' . '''".'' :"" '1"'.' . ","'" 1:1.11,1.'1:~ , 11:/11 '.".' \'1 .'J'. .. i,~" l.\i'! ,{ !11~li ;:!Ii'i f iiili'l !.~I~r,~~,.,!,I,,' t '~ ,Q:1.llj J i~ ~,~' l .~ ,.....1 , 1~1:.I"l i JI:~i' !; ; ~ --~ .......; .:~ l (. .... ",'; . ~l""''',l.,, ',',." ~1i:~jl ::1:~~ :': ;"(",',' . f~':fA:,I, ~I!J!="'.~~ F,'" '" , I'~ ,=,. 'I' "., t :t~~I'~I'O'';' ii..", " ,~~:';. i I ..~I:". ..:,,' i,'; " :~tt'~I}~fl> (', 7 "':'~"":'~~;:t::~'~ ~. 1111..'IIIlIII, I 1111 III' "_~ ~ ,.III~~II ''':jilli il,,:~',~~','~11 !il["::..~ I !I., I ~ ! I ~g> ~1'~ J~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -< ~~ ., . .". ,'. ", "'. -:......, .. 11, I.rr,.~i'li'!:iil:"":-l~zu ' ~ &{ . '. ..... . ,",,". ~;!J%~;~:;:'"'' ' ."-' .C 1": ,I.. '".. " , L::~. ":"" , ';:>~}~i;~:,~'~~~': '; ..1766 ':'!i ," ":..... ~ -N- ~ '. :'..,. ,; . :.~.. ..... '\,}l~l!~j: ," i:;.. ~ ~.'.' .:r" r:"... . .~~:~...~~.~== . ..;. , ::.:;~. :'~~:.~ 'f:7:.~ : . ,.. .".-'J(:,"j;;'" , ..R;'..', N. T,5, ':s.,' ,~'~: Q %',cf .~ I? :r % ~.. '? ~ ::s '" o -./ '~~ 1087 "', ....-;-. , ;:'~ o ~ ".Y;~;fit> '., 1071 I 1409 1410 ',05 1453 1 ~ 5 ~ 1452 @ 1455 197 --.}- J J .> ,lo. <; 1175 1430 1515 ~ - 1187 "'. r , 1450 l 111'1 nlljllllll 11'1~IIW1\I..j'""""Io" _.... -;~.. I . 111111111111 '.11'11__ '] 'e flrl~I~lj .~I~ II .: ,';" ."/'~":: ,,'," . . ~i' l'I'~~""I"~I," I . .Jl..:....~l....:........ . .... ,':' . '::., ~ ~" I, i"" II I' 'II' '" ,..,1. ',,' " ',,', ,',.. .", , " '1H ~1I.~;tIIJ'IJ,. ".~ :;~R.;;~~:::; .:..... ':.~~.~::.r.~ " . ........ ," ".l .,,"'\. I 11'1'.),1" <~,". .'. "e','... - ". .,', >->l <f!. :',' , :~~~ ~j t~~I.1 ~4'I...,~ I ,;:-:.:. :'..: .::.... ;.:.,..;.n:... ',::- _ :... '. . 'l:!" i'.I...,.,,,., .. .1, ,.1.,...'", ,"'.,....'..,..,1:,'.. " ,_. , " " I' rli :~~:; i!':lfi~~~ : ":,~:;~~~;:: :~:/~{~~~~:;.~/ :,: ",', ,,:7;::::,:,;:.:,-:,,>:,',: ,'. ':'" ' 'I ! ,~llIHII"'. r~,'-:.. ;' -!'~~.J'" ",..,1.""..,.....",'.., ~',' ~. ,_ ~ i ~ !.!~jHi'~~:~!~' , .. ,~'?;: ":~iW '-~~~~'L:;':..\~;~,:~>~f~~;%i:~:':~":X:~,;';,' i l'I'~il'JI,jJ.I" 00':," :,: ", - ,!;! :- , :.!~.;,' ~ICl~i ",;",;t:--. ,~"\' .. ' , . ~.-.. ~lll' c:,;~ -\:, . . .. ~~ . !l!~i~~i:~l~i :t'::~~t~~~.,....:_. . .:~~: '.: i1 ...~~.,.I "~..!l, '.-" .-..,' , .. -, ' 1 t;~!~; '~~;llllt~;;t ~~:::.~~::~t... .:..:.._:::~~~?:~::.-.~~.:, n~.' ~l' 11'~'''i,: .,::,..-,' " ',"'" ~:',",':':"', 'i :-0;/ ~i~i:ll~;~ ~.~:; '?:;" ,,;.. ';..,:~:i,'~::'t~""4:'" , f""., 'l' C'" ,,. " " ..' ," .! ~~I ~i :...II:~=.:~ . . : ~ ,:,qli"lt;eU:3.~ ,,' ''- ' ' ; ::<!'tllr511~!:i :;" ,:':' ;, ~ 1i':~~r~::1~;~ S~i~ ~:,-/': ",:,~, , , ~'~lr~:I;-';: "';'" ' , '. ~l~\J~~'J ...'. .' .... : ::g'''''':: ,"0; .~.:-: ~ ; :,>:. ~ .. ':1, , . ..... ~ (~\. . . ;~~J {?: .. .~~ "J,!,: .Y': 'a:: ::~~: 'r' 9 I ~! I~ p~ ~~ 2 o -< !~ 'c( C,; ~ -N- ~. .- - - - - .. ..J" . lID I " " - I' , -.....c -' ~ ~~,~;:':,:",lliil" 'J. '....,~' BIll ..... ... - , ':~:'/~ \t<':<' :.::" ", "",:',~t~:~ , , .'. '~,',' "".,.,:,..,::,:,_::~':":!.4",,,,.,',,:,';:',,',',,'..':,.:'"::,~,,,,~;','.,',."":"""""""~"";:'.".,1."::,,... =';"~'."~'''''':''':''''''''''':'':':'''''''' ':, ,,'., ,',,' .' .. ' 'L?(" ," ":'~::',' ,,'~ ,~~~:, ":/~i~~~':];i~"~;~~; '"CITY OF:WINTER'S@RING8':?':" "'0",, , , ".., "', , 2910 FUTURE TAAJ:;,FIC ,CIRCULATION'MAe ':;=~;~ ,~:::~]" :~ ,':::::: -.... . '_i .:'-'::" ._ .1\" / ........ ......,-:-. '.' J/SW ,. - . ',-:~i.~:,:... ,'tx~~~::' :::," ./ '. M eWl '.' ....., .: ' E:Xlsm~o ROADWAY; .LA~.~...~" CA.UClr;JI ~....:l....', STA IT AND CDJfH"( FUliC":O -'-'-'- ""It" Noc:::l LPcO'oo(J.D111 . ........ ....., GO..I...-T'T rv..e:c:; 1U'.O"-'CJ,.("}lll IJUHICIPAL IUPACT m rUIiC;':O D('o{~ 0""0 1'\:..:, ":l """O~l1 """"'Im IU" . ()'o(\Q, 11 fUNCnOOA!. c:u.SSlnCH,Ct i PA 1"I-uO'~ "':'1C4~ MA \4..0. """,t.,o.... RA 'UW MlOo.w MC ""-"" cnu"", CMC CI:>o.kI'T ","" c:J1l"", ~ot'tr IoU. ttOUOrlf'C).~ ~I ~:l: JJ< \IUIICPJ.L ca.JIelt.1~':. /iUl.IBOl CF LmES (4) I'L.A.oO.ll e:f .o....?HT I..H(I HOIlJ 1IQ.I.CI....n toOl L..UQ..CI x..r.'O( r-..o \...0..-(\ .... '.. ~ - - - .- -- ,.... - .. :...., "<,::.- .. : , IllS( ,d5m ~ ill.lli 1766 .:. <, ;'- '~':.-::': ,..,'..,:,'J:. ;';,' ,:',' , ,!':"'A,,;~!:," ......;:. , ',,~,,:',::'~,:!',:?1i::. .'J..,.....: .:' , " " "':,!; .' .,'. :~. g"~" ,~ . J~:'_. :F.1. .'~~: ~i~ti :, '~t;.' ,8, :r ;~' ~~03_-€t, ' , , " ~. ....~.~.. . - ,'Ok', ','," ':,: :,:; ::':' ," ".:"~ ..." , ,~'", 'x, Q" CO '".',,' ,.."" !C':'{ '~':,'" ~:f'-. '1109, ' :," ,"':,..1116 ," , : {.i:8 """",' , . y...\".~:.' .~l':" ,:;' .. 1071 .., I " ~':. . ':UI' ;'::':'.g~',':"., :~:' . '.. . . . '. ". ::':"~";:'-::"I' , ".; .'. .',: , ' , , ~i~ @~~ :P Z ~ ~ ,~ ~ -< ~ 1187 1430 r f :n ~8 ~~ '. 1450 J '~ -N- ~ N,T,S, 1409 1410 1435 1453 145.; H52 @ 1456 ....."':1 II .:> " '7 1175 15\6 J +.... .:J;:;.;....~;i.".~:.,.~j.I,.;: .:;..;~~~~ ~r:J ..~... , .........\1.....'. ,.,': . ," ,'..;.' ' ...., <,;,~~Il'.... ./,>:.:1','::_ Iml ~ .:. ;":" , , Y?];'~J.i:;~~tl;j~;:~?:~;f;~g:"L;"<Ci:_ . "'r. . ,', ':;.' , 778 Tliscawllla Unit 11 66 . 778 Chelsea Woods 321 7:7,8 'Sear Creek Estates 67 778 Chestnut Estates Ph. 1 & 2' 37 . 14 I; .. 491 0 0 0 14' (,'..' , 0 0 0 .....,... 72 EaolE~s Waich"Ph.'1 &2,' 57 53 72 Howell Creek' Ph. 1 &2 56 100 72 Tuscawllla Tract 15 Parcel 3 ' 80" ' ' -.". " '-.' " ' , 113 0 /0 0, 233 0 0 0 82 Tuscawllla Unit 11 S '\ 28 82 Tuscawllla Unit:12' 90 ..' '. " .. : .- , , :', ,82' Arrowhead'Unit, 1 '(Parcels 3 4'5), 0: .. : 1'1 : ij"J:~':, 82,: : 'Fi:liiWi3vo'akS'::;, 72 , " .... ;82':' 'WobClstte'am','(Arrowhead UnitS) 32 56 " 82 Greenbriar Phase 1 86 ,:82i' : 'Gre'enbrhafPhase 2 " 34 81 .'.. "82,;"'! 'Chesea,.P.arc' Phase 2 36 " '.,'::" " ' " . ..... .' .' . '-.f~~: .::.. 82 'Cheis'ea::Parc"pha~e3(Fox Glen)' 11 51 ,0:82:, ': ' Ch'ers'ea-:ParcPhase 4 40 : " ' ' .., .. . 82 'Seniley.' G,:e'erl', 44 .. " "~8f" Bentlev Club . 41 "82 ' GIE~ii Eaale Unllid ,2 & 3 257 , Carrlnaton Woods - 82 76 82 Davenport Glen' 70 82 Chestnut Rldoe .. 52 82 Tuscawllla Unit #13 39 - 82 Braewlck 85 82 Tuscawllla Unit 7 79 1132 0 0 0 239 0 0 0 , f .... ~ @)\If . .. I.......I~.' " .'" "'",;"~,,U'~f1t'....._.~.,J"".l.I""'I. -:.. .. - . -- - - - -- .....",'...:,'... IIZIIII dml ~ r~0;l " , :':f~~!:~[~~:J:<ij~i:~~U{~~\t~i]~i~~.'i:.~~;,0i;~!,;;,~).~:,,:!;;:.:':~;:: .... I .~. . ..:;;.j.~i...:-. . ':,::> . ..,..,:..,;:~~;,:'~:~?:'::;;~~ji~,~*i.~~,':::;.',,:i.~jk1;~6~.,~M~i~<l:, '.~.~ ',. .~.~~:.;~;.<./. " ..~~':.;: 7~ .:; " .. .- , - ..... .- .... .. '" " .. ..,-..... '-- 783 Tuscawilla ,Unit 8 78 783 " Tuscawlllri' Unit 9 & 98 164 783 Casa Park Villas . 316 783 Tuscanv Place , 72 '.f 72 r. 783 Indian Trails MIddle School 1 783 Keeth Elementarv 1 242- .., ,; .. .. 388 2 0 0, .......: !' 72', 0 0 84 The Reserve at Tuscawllla , \ 44 48 ..... -- " .. . 44 0 " 0 0 48 0 0 0 83 Tusca'Oaks Phase 1 & 2 98 "~. 40 " 83:',;," Wedciewoo'dTennls Villas .. 233 .. :' ,,":~<: ..... .. " " c : ':, 7' 83':": " Georaetown':Unlts'1 2'& 3 " 214 .., .- ,0 , .. .. 545 0 0 0 40 .... .. 0' 0 0 85 St. Johns Landino .. 31 " ~ .. .. .".. " ..... . ..-. : :,85 McDonalds 1 ,,,. "':.:. ":,;,,, ", .. " , .. ,'" ':,;:,~,: " --, 0.'.;' 1\; "::;':,.';-31'.", ;:;~;~:.- ,,0'..,'. :::i.':;i'i-':~.. .~. '.. .:~: ..:;.:\.;'.::' . .- .., 0 0 .' 0 0 : ," -". " '.... : .. , .. .. ,,' 785 :":.,, vii IS;,' Munlclpsl: 8ulldlnci'i " .. 1/" .. ," :. -~;:~/':~~.;:{:~-:F;/;'~' :~~; ~':' ", " .., ; .... " : -- ", " . ," .. '<,:7ifs;tz WfS~HiahfSchooF::'):'.r"" ,", : .. :'J,' .., 1:::,: " '..;.;......:. ,.......-.. .... , " .... . ~!"':~~' .. ,-. .. < f,li85~ ~Bilis~"(:atlcfscaDlilQ~<, ";,;:;}:-:;~' , : .. .. 1" .. .. .~ :..:...;:: .,:F::-:.~-:~\~'.:~l~... .~.. ',"; ,:',: .. .. ", .. " " .. ,0' -, ~~ *~d85'~~ c~."iFafWinds~'Park ~,' .. : .. " .. ~; 1- .. .. ....~::.: .~i~~~~':.:;" ~"';",:F-': ',' " 0 0 4 0 0,::" .. .. " 0 0 0 780 Arbor' Glen 37 1,/" " :', ':,', " 7a'o Tuscawllla Unit 6 89 ! " ' .. .. 780 St. Sleohens 1 .. 780 Kinder Care 1 .... ~ ". 780 Seven-Eleven 1 " 780 Tuscawllla Realtv 1 780 \ Tuscawilla Office Complex .. , 1'26 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 , , f ..,. .... ,.... .' " , . ". ~ .:::::':~\~. - - -.. .... ~ mm G1!Lt:.l E:8] I, . .. ..,.. }, . ...; :..!::~ :. .:' ," J. 781 Tuscawil/a Unit 1 111 ' . , . .,'.:. ~.' ;..,," - 781 Tuscawilla Unit 2, 781 Tuscawllla Unit 4 781 Wedqewood Units 1.2 & 3 781 Country Club Vlllaqe 1 2. & 3 781 Arrowhead Unit 2 781 Arrowhead Unit 1 - (Partial) 781 Tuscawllla Country Club ,781 Arrowhead Unit 3 781 Arrowhead Unit 4 ":'>"'" ,.",.. ; " 782. Winte'r Sorlnos Unit 3 ,:::tr.'/,':;::,i~'" ..:~: ,,788 'Oak Forest Unit 1 788 Oak ForestUnlt '22A & 28 ":788 Oak.'Fo'rest Unlf3, 788 Oak ForesLUhli 4 788"" TuscawIUci:;,UnW5: , " ' ", ,:' ',:,'788'," GrandR'eserVe:: ~~1~if?}:: < > ('/'.., :, ,; :'~': ';, F:' ,:',;,: '/,"'::.' " :, A,~,'~,',~,'~,'?:,t,';,,"" :':7"86;;':':: :bak,F~iesi:UnIt5 lots,468 to '56~~ ' .. ,;, ,"':7.86.;(> ,:Oak',ForesHJhlt6, 1015562t07151' .:~-;::: .' 786',<0' Oak Forest'UnIf-7: 716 to 808\ ' 786 Oak Foresf Urilt 8 Ibts 809 to 940) 65 379 128 245 . 10 1 18 7' ;': : --:: .~.:.:...' ..~. ". .", .' 939 129 129 114 163 '120 75 '10 ,i4 ~186 94, " 154, 93' 132 473 1 , 20 20 0 1 0 ' 65 " ? ;:~;",: :", 0' 0 0 "':'" ' " ,'..",.. .. 0 0 : 0 , 0";:<;::' , 0' 0 0 .. ,,' , , , ." '. .. .. .. ) . .:. ':-.:;:':'~.~; .. ......:. .. ............ o o o " ~' 12 ';',.'? :<~ 12 o o o " , , ,87 ',Winter SciinasPost Office 87SemlnolePli'ies'~::"":' ", 87 Wlndlnq Hollow (east of EasemenO o o ' 1;,: ':, ;, o o ".,',' o o o 102 102,' o 1 o too .. ' , 63 '163 .. o o o , f , . " . ~ .. . ,'- ~:~'.. : . . .:~.:'.. .:.:':~.' ..' .":.;.-. -;. ..;..... ',,: :::>'./r:~;~~q" .' .~: ..' ~:.:.: -;. ' .... ." . ' '" .... ....: .- ~"- """. I " - - ...... - . ,;. " "::~:.:'. :"'<: .. .~; ~., ,.' . %~~f~ .. j, , , 787 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 9 109 , 787 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 10 112 787 WindlnQ Hollow 149 187 , 370, 0 0 0 187: .: 0 0 0 90 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 2 52 : 90 North Orlando Ranches See, 2A 196 90 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 5 22 3 90 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 8 72 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 1 (Part), - 90 14 3 90 North Orlando Ranches Sec. ~ (Part) 3 ,/ 5 . 359 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 88 Seville Chase 0 110 : Dunmar Estates 20 ' ,,' " , , ..... .. 20 0 0 0' '110 ..":' 0 '0 0 .... 791 Mosswood Aoartments 147 .. 791 Moss Glen Townhomes 10 791' The Vlnevards,', " , , 171 .. '791 ' , The,Sea'sons " : 26 115':':"" ,> 791 ' .' North Orlando Ranches Sec. 4 (Part) 5 - .. :'2', ' ::'~,.-''',:,~: , 791: , , North Orlando Ranches Sec. 1 (Part) 25 5 .-,". ' , 227 157 0 0 122 0 0 0 ' ' .:. ..;.,. . ~.; 790 ' HacIenda Vlllaoe' 441 6 r. ,.-' .:790..,,' Plnewood Terrace 32 .;. ;,,790: ': State Farm'.lnsurance 1 " 790 Cumberland Farms 2 , ' ....,.. 441 32 3 0 ' ,6 ' , 0' 0 .. 0 . . . . .'" t._ ..;.:. .....: . . ~~...~ \ ' \ ": '. . . . . .......... ~f~'f(J<'- it, ",. " , , .' .' ,.... . ~ ~_. ..... .,l;' .. '.. .' .. ." . '."" :';"'" .... . ..' ..'.. , f ,~';,:.' . . ....... "(":'.'-' .. ;:":.,,,,"'.. ". . .:.," ". '.:' .:~.'~~~F:-:~;~... .. '. ; '.: ..::j' ~;;~':.?~:\'.':' ~ " . " ".' '. -' .' '.~ '.' .~. :..' ':'. ~ mm ----. -' -- - mm ~ -- -- - .. ..1aIII ,RBI J , ',. " I- 92 Hlohlands Seclfon 6 56 .," , " 92 North Orlando 141 92 North Orlando 1st Addition 138 92 North Orlando 4lh'Addlllon 242, " 92 North Orlando 5th Addllfon (oartlal) 34 , 92 North Orlando 8th Addition 22 92 Lori Ann Acres 64 92 Doua's Unit 10 56 92 Moss Road Quads : 20 92 Indian Rldae 84 .' - 92 Deer Sona 152 92 FaIrfax Aoartments 16 92 La Petite Nursery 1 92 Mr, Bubbles CarWash 1 92 Dr, Pele Corum 92 Banfield Funeral Home 1 92 Excelsior Park , 1 92 Wlnle'r Sorlrios Center 33 .:: .... 92 ' Barnett Bank 1 ' , , .. 92, Villa'oe, Market: Place , " 92 AuI6motlve~On'e:', '; 1 ,92 ' .. Circle K ", 1 .. ,92 Public Works' Comolex 1 92,' ' Flie':Slallon ' 1 92 Public Safety Comolex 1 633 392 42 0 0 : 0 0 0 I, \' .>.-.;".! _I' . ,. ;," ... '.. .' .' . ~ ~.. . . ....._.':_r._k .... . .' . -. '. ,', ," ' h,",;:~:~::;:~~ht7:;{ ~~. . . .-.....:., . ');'Jl>(':' ;:: ,'" . . .'. . .:. ~ ';,.' ". .: . .: :..... ~...:.;...: . . ~. ,,",.: , f .... ,,' ~' , .",". '. ....../-..-~:i.:(:.: .' .~ ':. . ....:... : ;.:;.... . :-:'.-.. ~ .: -~ :... : ".~'. : ....... . ...... mm ~ - - -- - -,... -- .... - .... - .... ~ ~ rmg t!:m:iI ~ 93 Winter Sorlnos Industrial Park . 93 Broadwav Gymnastics 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 94 HiQhlands Sectlon,'1 102' " 94 Hiohlands Section 2 41 94 Hiohlands Sectlon 4 75 94 Hlohlands Section 7 & 8 56 2 94 Hiohlands (Blades Court) 8 94 Hlohlands East Quadraolxes 16 94 Hiqhlands Patio Homes 25 " ." 94 Cvoress Club 75 94 Cvoress Villaoe 22 94 Sheoah Section 2 144 94 Sheoah Section 3 28 94 Hlohland Villaoe One 62 94 Hlohland Villaoe Two 74 94 Hiohland Lakes 31 10 94 Hlohlands Elementary School 1 94 Bavtree 182 449, 492 1 0 12 0 0 0 95 Sheoah Site A 46 95 Golf Terrace Aoartments 380 250 - 95 Wildwood 120 170 95 Seville on the Green 200 '20' 95 Greensoolnt 107 9 95 Hiahlands Section 5 41 95 Winter Sorlngs Golf Course 95 Hiohlands Glen 15 14 95 Sheoah Sec. 1 44 327 796 0 0 23 270 0 0 89 I North Orlando Ranches Sec. 1 12 ' 6 89 North Orlando Ranches Sec, 1A & 1 B' 55 '3 89 North Orlando Ranches See, 6 37 2 89 North Orlando Ranches Sec 7 : 43 3 147 , 14 / .' '. .. -..:. " " . :.... ...... .' .."... .. . .~. ~.i'" " .:. ".. ..... . :. .-. ......-.: .', :.......... .'1 ~. . .: :~'\. ATTACHMENT r D -, -~ . ..~::. .. . , "I . .....~;~ ,,:::,,;:':~ :;::i;- ~ . ':!'" :' :,' .;': " . . . ! ~ "; ,. ) 1 '-.. " .~ . -....~...:.. I " I ] ) ] ] 1 I I I I I .1 : " ,. ~. .:; . I'. . , , . . . . "'.' ," , SUPPLEMENT NO.'l" To CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS TRANSPORTATION STUDY -, December 19"99 CPH Engineers, Inc. II 17 E. Robinson Street Orlando, Florida 3280 I (407) 425-0452 CPH Proj~cl No. W0459,03 ..~:~, .~:~:J;~~:' :......,......: . l,~.j '...; '. ..../: :~~ The 'rrallsporlation 5111dy was cO'l1plctcd in 1997 a/ld idcntified 110 deficiencies in the transpOl1alion infraSlructure of the City OfWin(cr Springs' loc,,1 system for the projected 2010 lr<lffic IO<ldings. Roadways identified for improvcments includcd U.S, 17-92, S.R, 434, Semillola Boulevard, Lake Drive, and TuskawiJla Road which are under the control of the County and FOOT. U,S. 17-92 is under final construction of a six-lane improvement project from Shepard Road (Winter Springs) south to Melody Lane (Casselbeny). State Road 434 has been improved to four lanes form S.R. 4] 9 to the Greeneway. Seminola Boulevard has been improved to four lanes; Tuskawilla Road has been improved 10 four Janes divided and Lake Drive is currently under design for four lan~,di~ided_ This .. ' ,supplement updates the 1997 study to acknowledg~' these i~pro;~m~h~,".m(i' 'th,e" ~~es also, ' . ",r., ," c,,,, coustructed by, th-,; City. No changes were made 10 the land use, existing uses, or projected ' 'developmenl It has become evident that a collector road system is required for the undeveloped area east of the City Hall. This area has been designated as the Town Center and is scheduled for growth within the planning period. A roadway c0~.lector system has been identified to serve this area. Since these roads are for new growth, the funding is projected to tome from the transportation impact fee. This coHector system is shown on the attached revised drawings. ---- Only updated materials are attached to this supplement. Since the growth projections have not been revised, the overall traffic study remains valid. ,. . . " ..:;..... ,,:~: ,~~-' ~.._:_~ - .. ,- .... " .' . ..:;- ~~~" ),',:\:,; ,,<,.., .' ':::~~':.~.. ;:" I ,. .';. 1 "::'~;;:~:k:',i,:':::~\~~5;+i ":' ' 1 .'~' i"" <::,:REVISEDIUPl)ATEDTABLES' and' FIGURES . .' . . '...~"e:::'.' J - ---- ,. " , .... '''.:'' I", I :! ~~ii~_Ji~f~~i;k;;i\.'" :~,~:j;;~~t~;;~i.~Q~;72ffJLi::.- ,. ODJEcrlvr:: G) Conserve the nalural environment <lncl augment open sp<lce in the City <IS fUllctions of rO<ld development. Policies 1) Where valid options are available, choose rights-of-way for the City collector 'system distant,enough from natural drainage features and upland habitats to coexist with 'tliese natural areas, .... '. :.:.... 2) The incursion of a roadway through these natural areas shall be allowed if it , ,',.' ;";'," ,",j,., benefits the public need. such as for access by emergency vehicles or transporting ,<:..',C,~,~:;::::',.M~;':\,;~/;>:;j\:S~1iQ9.l. .chi~dreP.. outw~ighing other concerns. ' ' ",3) , "Include in all new road plans adequate right-of-way for potentiallandseaping and provide for maintenance. in the annual budget of the City. 4) Designate scenic to preserve as much as possible of existing vegetation 'and canopy, ":'" "oBfficrrvE* , H) Ensure that current and future rights-of-way' are protected from encroachment from structures or ancillary uses inconsistent with the designation of rights-of-way. Rights-of- way necessary for the maintenance of level of service standards and for the safe design of roadways in accordance with State standards shall be required. ... --- Policies 1) The City, in its land development regulations shall require the dedication of all ,needed rights-of-'rfay and necessary roadway improvements for all new ' development. and adopt provisions to protect existing rights-of-way by limiting the use and/or encroachment by structures and ancillary uses. :', ,', : ", ...... . 2) TIle City shall acquire right-of-way for future transportation needs as funds become available, , ", ,,*Ite~ H - Reviss:~ 1'))99 '. ;::., :,........ ::-:..... 1'11-6 . -~;.....~.;;.....-;;-~i..- .,1,.0: ';~r,~~'~..-.i.;:-:--.--j~..W'.J-TI~~. ~i~- :'_~'.- "':':. T:lIJlc 2 (Hc"isccl ) 2/99) ,I L .', ; I J " ] 1999 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION WINTER SPIUNGSTI1ANSPORTATION STUDY , Freeways' Princio;}J Arleri:lls (Slate) " , ,I) ':,Easlern Beltway (Slale) I) 2) SR 434 SR 419 " ' -' .," .. . '. . . Pnncipal Arterials (CountY) Maior Colleclors (County) ;] 1) , ,Red Bug Lake Road ":' ..'~:::~~L~,~~~;~~l,~,~t::;~ka~~~a~, ':~'" Minor Collectors (CountY) 1) 2) East Lake Drive Red Bug Lake Road - Tuskawilla Road to Eastern Beltway :1 :J ,J ~,.-. D'Odd Road '~' :'::~gl~ 'Boulevard Shepard Road - U.S. 17-92 10 Winter Springs City Limit Tuskawilla Road (North ofSR 434) '" 'It:,: 2) 3J 4) J, ":'~:',~:;~::",;,::': ~U~'i~i~ai'Collectors (CitY) J , '\, 1) B;iliama Road - Shore Road to Hayes Road 2) , : Dolphin Road - Moss Road to Hayes Road 3) Dyson Road - Tuskawilla Road to Shetland Avenue 4) n Avenue - Panama Road to, SR 419 '}.t' 5) Fischer oad - Panama Road to E. Lake Drive X{t 6) r en riar Lane - Northern Way to Winter Springs Boulevard 7) , Hayes Road - SR 434 to Bahama Road 8) Moss Road - SR 419 to Panama Road ': ,9), NoI1hein Way - All , , J 0)", ' : Panama Road - Shore Road 10 Edgemon Avenue H) Shepard Road - SenUnole County Line to End : 1,7).:,' '.,Sheo3h Boulevard - Shepard Road to SR 434 ,:l~).<:~-.:Sh:~i-c Road - Panama Road to,End , <'14)c":"Wuiding Hollow BoiJlevard - SR 434 to End ',,' :)5)," , ',=,\Yintcr Springs B()lllcvard - Tuskawilla Road to Eastern Beltway ,16}', ':.-:, Tro,twood BouleVard- TuskawillaRoad to Northern Way 17)" ,:,;:)::usc<?ra Drive - SR 434 10 Northern Way ":18),/': :'"Yista-Willa Drive -SR 434 to Northern Way , 19), :, ,': Town Center, Collector SR 434 to Tuscawilla (East and West) J 1 oJ' '1 1,', ,I i , ,j :; -_....;:.::~,:... .' ," . j-' ,::'.. " Id::~~~01;P, ..' ____ __________ .-u.~..,~":._C<;."Y'_-., -- ._..'--.~70--"'''_~.~~~~.'~~'~'~'''1~...'''.:...''''4"'''-..r.;.~;: ." __~__-_.... ,,~'_.~.u-~._.-__ 'W' ~~_,,~~_'_' 111-9 _______ ______._ __.unn_ ou.._n.._..._..u ". ._'E~__'_"~_ ~~_~ __.~..__.~...~~__ .r. _ "'......rw._w..._ "-__""~'.~_-'_'.""~ ;l"""''-':tiI''''''-C:..;';... .' ------- -- .... . _____________. ___nn_. .".r...-,.' ~.';;:;~~'_...,,;,....: . ~.. _ -___..rr_..._._"._.__~.~-~~~~.._,. ...... _____ - _u_____ __ ___ ____ __ _..______ ___".._ .__ ___ _ ,___ .___J ___.__ ___~ .....~.__.,..._ __ - _un__ __ _ n_ .. ~,;:;"!..._;~~.i!t...;"oe:'4..-.~jlO>.";,,..o...r-':. -..'.....~.,..o;t...-: ," ~ '---- ,. ~ " ""'.i'l I l: CU';Uu\LJ/.LD ,\,'-;NUA.L^VUlJ\CC O^ILY VOLUl\lf..S FOil f'I..OltIJ)/\'S URBANIZED AREAS + ST ^ IT T'\V ()... IV ^ Y A.ltTUUAL.S UN IKTCJUW I'T(D f'U)w U cui V>.JlL<;<l uv-cl ot Suvic< 1..>00 , 2 UDdiy. .( Diy. 6 Diy. ^ : 8.900 21XJQ ,)2,.200 D 1).900 )5.800 5).700 E )).100 71.600 , , 10'1,.(00 C 18.900 50.100 75.200 o 2,(.800 60.100 90.200 J.NITRRUl"TED now Group I Lu>o .( 6 8 10 12 ffU:(\V^ YS (wi.hi,. UJbU'lLuJ ..,c._ over j.Q().()()() .fl.lll~iol 1O 0.- pl..)..Jin, -ilhi" j milu 01 Ihe primary (;Iy ocnlr~ b\Uinc:u dulria) Lev<: I 0 I Sc rv>oc C 52.,900 79.-400 I o..s. 900 \)2.,-<<X> 1.11.700 ^ o )5.200 52.900 70,500 88.200 101.100 E 80.800 12.6.900 I 69,.2.00 , 211,400 2,( 2..JOO . o 67.000 100.600 I~.IOO 167:100 192..200 21.0c0 )).100 4-1.100 5j~ 6) .200 OlU.l h (>0.00 10 2,(9 >i&ruJi::w:lln~n<diorn lX' mile) , ',-'~I>CS ", A ':,',:,'_",:"..l',~B600.,',',:,:",:Lcvc,."",',:.::~':.,'.,',:,':ll~s:"., ,;~1~}~t~~1~f_~7n ;900 J';~ '6 Diy. ,43.200 5O,-<<Xl , 8 Diy. 5).800 ~OOO M.BOO Group J (.....ithir. u,b.nU.cd ar<..l .Dd nO! in Group 1) Lc vt: 1 o.l Sc rvioc lu>o ^ D C D E E....~... . : " 21).)00 32..$00 .{.II.BOO 61,800 7...'SOO ,17,000:: C', 6', 30.600 .. 8.roo 7). -<<X> 93.000 , 117 .JOO 35.800 L 8 -<<>.800 65;200 97.900 124.000 156.300 53.700 ^ 10 51.0c0 81.5 00 1 Z2...JOO 155.000 195,-<<Xl 65.800 :i 12 58,400 9~.200 140.000 177 .JOO 223.,600 :i 1 ;.J ] f J 1 J' J J ] ] .J 1 J ] 1 :L ;J ('_\:"~;.....". , ., i :i NON.sTATEROADWAYS MAJOR arY/GOt.JNTY ROADWAYS Level of Scrvio: UDC.> N. D" C ~ E 2Undiv 10.900 15.500' 4 Diy. 2... -<<X> 3).200 6 Diy. 37.800 "7.500 50.,200 OTHER SIGNALIZED ROADWAYS c (,,; p.>J i2.cd inl.c n.c:a.ion >.n.aJ Y'll) l Level or Scrvia: ^ unu AU B" C E :i 2 Undjv 5.200 11.700 s .( Diy. 11.<400 ::!.5loo II Ou..olb ~O 10"'~ ~i&ruJiiod i~len<dJolU lXr milc) , , LeY'CI oi Savio: AU B" C 8.800 19.200 2,9.)00 )5.8OCl. "\ 1..> l>C:1 2 Undiy. .. Diy. 6 Diy. 8 Diy. E 1.1.900 3-4.(0) 51.400 62.900 ,- a ~ u (fQOf'C 1h>.A ...60 .i & n.aJiud iDLcn.ca.ioru per mil c a.nd'DOI withia pnmuy cilY ccDtnJ bv.incu dUlria of IJJb11>i=I area Over 500.CXXl) Lc vel of $crvic< unu, AU B" C.. 0 E 2 Undiv. 11.800 15.200 -4 Diy; 26,500 J).4OO 60jv. 40.700 50.600 8 Diy, ~9.7oo 61.800 O:a.u III (more than 4.50 .i&lUli:Lcd inl.cDCCliocu pet mllc aDd within prinury city ccntnJ b\Uincu distnCl of urbanixcd ~rca oycr 500.(0)) Level of Sc rvitt unc.s AU , 2 Undiy. ' ' '.. Diy." 6 Diy. ,8 Diy.,' " Boo C. D E lJ.200 H.BOO 29.500 J2.600 ~.BOO .(9.300 5-4.700 60,100 :":, ,-t.- 1...lncs 2 C 2 L Malli ^ Multi s III ADJUSTMD--rs DIVlDEDfUNDlVlDED (utel corrcponding IWO-W'Y velum<: indiolcd ~nl) Mal.... Lett Turn fuys Adjustment fKton O;-..;&X! Yu ...1% Uodi-.;&d No .2O<;b Uoo~ Yo .5% UDdiv i&cd No _ 2.S 90 ONfrWA Y (>,!ler com:apondjnr; r-o-w.y vclwnc iz>diclIcd pc;.ro:nt) Onc.W.y Con-<:>ponding Adjustm<nl u DC.> Two- W. Y La.oc:a F. ClOt 2 <4 --to% ) 6 -40% ~ 8 -4O'iIlo .1 8 -~% .].:.....:..: " :.: ::~'. ":.-:= r.;" , , .. .. r'... .' ::':.-ri..'~"';"IOOt'~.'~""'~b..........." b~~~o-. lN~~h-~ht.oob'e.~.e...0-t4....-4to. ~~pl-~ ~ . .~:.~.~....;.,............ ~~_~--'bo~...~__~...-.-._...t--I~_~ v*"--~__-'~~r~(A.ADT)___._~ : ..;'~...:~~ =:::: ..~,.........) to.. \r-.Jo..t~......_ ~_.......... .t~, c...,....r-, ~--'u,...s-. -wi ~ -.me.. ---'-rr .-. ..p.JbD.t_ ~ Tl- ~. ~ .a-,~i.,~o~ ~O'ou... '-U. , c....- k ~w-.t.' , :. '. ....~ . '.:::.:i:~'-:' I I I - I P, ..,OVT Q..l.Q~' , ", '. ~ ..'. . .:,.' '. . , "/~~~~~;::.'~'.:... .;~~r?,:~>: /:. . J:::.:.'. ... . . , '~i~;~:;yi:;-7' ' ':~~?~i ' -".1,... .., . :'-;~.~::'~~:.:: .I.":~ .- ..-_.... . ;;-':'':''';' '. - ~ ':'.:... .- . '. :,~.;;t:.:,::',~'> ' . . . 'Jl~l-' .~ "', -..... .: '.. --' WIH l?CJOI :r^lI/llllj( --- ---...... "--J TABLE YEAR 2010 ROADWA Y LINK LEVELS OF SERVICE WJTI{ 20 I 0 NETWORK " ,,:::R()ADWA Y FROM' TO " ,S.R.~H . ...... SHt.PAIU) RD. SHEPARD RD. ,'c.R.m S,,1\.4),4 U,S.IM2 MOSS RD. " S.n.OI" MOSS RD.,:' . -'.:. .', '.' '- ~..: -' " .' ,~.. ':".f~~~ ,4,1 ?" S,R: Ill' c.R.m" """:' . .', 'iUSI<AWlLLA RD '\ , ,.!!^STE~N DaL TW^ Y S:ll: ~)( YUSKAWILl.t\ no $,1\, l\ 9 , U.S. 1M2 EDOEMON AVE. . . S:R: ~ 19; S.R.m EDOEMOl'l ^ VE. ..... ..... , ~, LM:E DI\IV!; SEMINOl.A DLVD FISHER ROAD .. , ~: L^K~DRIV~, I'ISHER,ROAD . TUSX,AWILLA RD, ....r , TUS~^WILLA RD. ',: REO BUO LK RD EAGLE BLVD. TUSKAWILLA RD. EAGLE BLVD. E. l.A.X.E'DRIVE TUSK^ WILl.t\ RD. E. l.t\KE DRIVE WINTER SPGS. DLVD TUSI0\WILLA RD, WINTER SPOS Bl.VD TROTWOODBLVD TUSKAWILLA RD. TROTWOOD Bl.VD. S.R.m SIlF.1'ARD RD, U.S, 17-92 SHEOAH BLVD. SHE1'AnD nO, SHEOAH Bl.VD. EDOEMON AVE, NO. OF ROADWAY LANES CLASS 6 ARTERIAl.,:' '. 6 ARTERIAl. ,: , .... '. ii. i f.. . LOSD: ONLY, CAP ACITY "MODEL, ' ,DAILY' VOLUME ' ----' OCccll\ucr 11)1)') (lor) ) vIe RA TIO MODEL DAJl...Y LOS E 6, ,~ . ... ARTERIAl. ^R,TE~LA+; ,; .. " ARTERIAL " ;/ MTllRIAI,.;::,.. ARTERIAl.,:":: ARTERIAl., COtLECTOn, COLl.ECTO~ ARTERIAl.' ARTERIAl. ARTERIAl. , ARTERIAl. ARTERIAl. COl.LECTOR COLLECTOR , SH!;O^II DLVD, SHEPARD RD. S.R.m f 2 COLLECTOR DAIl^M^ ROAD KA YES ROAD WINDING HOLLOW BL COl.l.ECTOR ... . MO~~ RO^D PANAMA ROAD DOl.PHIN ROAD COLLECTOR MOt~ nOAD DOl.PHIN ROAD S,R. ~,~ COl.l.ECTOR ',/~~~~?O,:: ' : ,<~i.5s;ioO: ' f" , ...',H~~{~<, ~1,5oo ':':~4 1',&00 " "~9~_i/i'.'.. H,5~ 41,500' .?it~": '/)?,900 1~,309 ", I~;~oo.:': "",};Ir6~~ 22,600 21':600 " :,::21,5~' ':,'~. 2~:600 41,500 ,':~?"soo. 35,,7,~ ' :)5;,500 35,700 :- 2s,ioo 35,100 ,:, 20,700 35.100 20,200 10,200 1.1,200 10,200 7.900 10,200 I,~oo 10,200 100 10.200 6,100 10,200 1,300 ,', 'I~'io : ,:' 1;\6 0.&& , ,-":')} (i:i9; :~. ;.: .';~;!' '..:.~...:, 1:09, D '::, ." D 1.19, ' , ,\J9 ", ,1.16 0,95 0 1.00 D 0.13 0 0.99 0 0.71 0 0,60 C 0.57 C 1.\0 E 0.71 D 0.12 o 0.01 c 0.61 D 0.72 D ,.l-J ',' "'-:.:": \f~~l ,..,':'_'.':." . '."':..... ':;'.:':;i.. ..... ..... "---' >w...- Ww..J v...-J ROADWAY FROM MOSS ROAD S.R.434 l --.. ~, l..-....i -----..J L-..J ~ ~ l.........J TABLE YEAR 2010 ROADWAY LINK LEVELS OF SERVICE WITI{ 2010 NETWORK ' TO NO,OF LANES C.R.419 NOinKERN WAY TROTWOOD BLVD TUSCOItA DR. 2 NORTHERN WAY TUSCORA DR. ,VISTA VILLA DR, 2 NORTHERN WA Y VISTA Vlt.LA DR., WlNTERSPO BLVD.E 2 NORTHl;RN WAY TROTWOOD DLVD WINTIiR SPO BLVD.S 2 NORTHERN WAy' WINTERSPO BW,D SHETLAND AVE. 2 .. " . ' , NORTIiE.RN WA Y ;.. "SHElLAND 'AVE,,: ,. ; "'$~fNBRlAR LN., '2 .. .. " .. .. NORTHERN WA Y GREENBRlM LN. \!lINTER SPRG BLVD 2 TROTWOOD BLVD TUSKA WILLA RD. . . ..... '.ii:~~:i'~::;r" ,:, ':t~~.?'-;::~.::,.. 4. " ;fl'"'" . T~~::: ::::~::' '; ::::::: WINTER SPG BLVD NORTHERN WAY WINTER SPO BLVD NORTHERN WA Y ',S,R. 426 PANAMA ROAD EDGEMON AVE. MOSS ROAD tANAMA ROAD HA YES ROAD BAHAMA ROAD HA Yl!S ROAD DOLPHIN ROAD ., DOLPHIN ROAD MOSS ROAD "'. fISI-Il!R ROAD EAST LAKE DRIVE NORTHERN WAY NORTHERN WA Y OREENBRIAR. LN.. NORTI-\ERN WA Y NORTHER.N WA Y MOSS ROAD SHORE ROAD DOLPHIN ROAD S.R. 4~4 f HA YES ROAD PANAMA ROAD ROADWA Y CLASS COLLEctOR COLLECTOR COLLECTOR COLLECTOR COLLE'CTOR. COLLECTOR COLLECTOR .::.-'..... COLLECT,OR 2 CGLLECTOR . ".. 2 COLLECTOR , COLLECTOI\ ' COLLECTOR 2, 2 2 ' COLLECTOR COLLECTOR 2 COLLECTOR COLLECTOR 2 2 COLLECTOR COLLECTOR 2 2 COLLECTOR 2 COLLECTOR LOSO, DAn. Y CAPACITY, ' 22,600 10,200 10,200 10,200 10,200 10,2,00 , 1 o.'~~o~ ': " IO,2Qo. , 10,200 . ':!. . ..., .... . ':'L:" ".~k"-::; , " MQDEL' ,oA.n.y VOLuME '1,4;100 ' , /; 6:;00 3,200, ..,;.::.-.... , 3600 :.S.~:~i>' ~:, ~. .' ':,2,500 ' " ' , '3'6'00 " , .....;:~.\r::.::..,.;:. ." :'i;~~{': ,";<,Poo.,:;o:' . .,. oJ.,_..,. _.. ,',..',:::~{i~~~~:'" ~O,200:' ':' ,/J,,5,?N-: . .>t-.: . 10,209 ' ';\~,600," 10,200 :5,000 12,000 ,II,I~O 22,600 ,II,~OO: ' 10,200 '9,100, 10,200 1,300 .. 10,200 ,2,090." 10,200 6,600 10,200 2,700 10,200 1,400 " .", ," ---.. -- __J Dcccmber I lNY (2 of3) 'j vie I:' MODEL ItA Tl0 DAILY LOSE .62 ' D 0.60 D 0.31 C 0.35 C 0.25 C 0.35 C 0.30 C 0.22" C 0.44 C " " .. 0.83 D 0.55 D 0.49 C 0.93 D 0.53 D 0.89 ' D 0.13 C 0.28- C 0.65 D 0.26 C 0.14 c ~ . ....~..:..>,=. . "'~~ ":<~' 'of, . ;:','... . ~ . . :.. " I.-..-...J ---- ROADWA Y TUSCORA DRJVE VISTAWILLA DR, GREENBRIAR LN. DYSON DRIVE ~ ~ ----- FROM NORTHERN WAY NORTHERN WAY NORTHERN WAY , ruSl<A WILLA RD. .' . .~ ,. . ~. ..... . ~ . :.:' ....::. \. :.. . 'SKETLANo A VE.~:~:'<:/:RED BUO LAl<ER,D. ,'oF' . SHETLAND AVE. "'DYSO~'O~VE':" \..--.' l----J ~ \.-- l:.l.....-.J TABLE , YEAR 2010 ROADWA Y LINK LEVELS OF SER:VlCE WlTH 2010 NETWORK TO S.R, 434 S.l\. 434 'l. WINTER SPRO BLVD, SHETLAND ^ VENUE . . . . , , DXSON, DRIVE NORTHERN WA Y ,~,: EDGEMON:~~E:" ,,:SEMIJ'J9.Y' ~,L~_q,,:p'~AMA ~OAD ....,.- '. " EDOEMON,AVE, \\'OJ S9002.T AB/nmlld4 '. S.R. 434 ," ': ' , :,S~~,~ff' ~9~~:'; :-' '~'R: 4,1 f 'SHEPARD ROAD. NO, OF ROADWA Y LANES CLASS 2 COLLECTOR 2 COLLECTOR ,I , 2 COLLECTOR 2 COLLECTOR ,2 COLLECTOR ' 2 COLLECTOR. .' 2 COt.LEc:r~)~ ' 2, COLLECTOR. 2 COLLECTOR I ---.J LOS D DAn. y CAPACITY '10.200 10,200 10.200 10.200 10.200 " 10,200 "lq,~OO" 'I?:~,OO; 10,200 '.--J l.--J ~/i : ~.~:;: ,t!::':: ' MODEL ,DAILY VOLUME ' !: 2,'700 .- I Deccmber 1999 (3 oD) '. vie ,:, MODEL' RATIO DAn. y LOSS 4,000 " -..' '" 1;50.0 ," . : .~...:.:..:~.~; :.~" . ,:.:.:;......:;., 2,600 '" ..;i!i~1;'.. }'~~t ..... ..... . 0.27 C 0.39 0.15 0,26 " ,0.34 , 0,49 ,0:89, ':' ,0,42: , , 0.39";' C c C C C D -,' C D ,: ~ G> o~ F; , s =U^" ~ I, 5' 0 ..., I ,~: ,,',::dJ i ~ , .. ., - ' ... .:--m',", )0;:"'" . .... ...,.~ ~ = :di~ C'1 ~ ;: ,:: g i ~ :,::'; i en c.. :.~'~~' m ~~:. ~ 9. :l :t I:........~; (/) 0 -' . ~~ - -3 - - z (")(") , l/) '- '> v. i;! n - ~ > :.' r- p !:' .., I z "!. ~ ~ v. I ^ .., - ..., ..:: '0 ">:,,!~;;,, :,::.';: 'N" ",,,,,, 0"'- ....J1~;'" " "'..,,"0 :,;~, :~t ~,{?\;:~::" " ' <"j :~:~:::~:~ . '~ < Om ~~ >~ g(f) Zv (f)~ ~Z ,0 -< 11 .. Q ~ . :n m - . -' ~ .. LEGEND: II:,~ = .. II ~._' ~ EIGHT LANES 'SIX LANES FOUR LANES THREE LANES TWO LANES PAVING/DRAINAGE " .I"~ I I ; J , J , '1"""'" ,I, .-. ," . :"0,, :,~. , o ,', EXTENSION TRAFFIC SIGNAL/ INTERSECTlON GEOME TRY EJ' If lJ ~~ ,EASTERN TOWN : " C~NTER COLLECTOR & o z ~~ 51<=: , 'LAKE DR. >- ~ >- ..J W .--. CD..J ..J z8 c:: '-' w, >- V1 <=: w I RED BUG LAKE D. o o o o t I -N- I ~ ~I. i .S. \ \ I ; I I ! I I T:1l>lc 15 2010 ROAD NEEDS DEVELOPER AND OTHER FUNDING (Inside City Limits) (Revised 12/99) Developer ,I. Connect Shepard Road to Edgemon A venue. (Completed) . 2. Improve Tuskawilla Road north of SR 434 (formerly Brantley Avenue). , (Switch ,to Impact Fee Fun<~ing) 3. Improve Spring Avenue with drainage and p~ving improvements. Counry 1. Improve Tuskawilla Road from two (2) lanes to four (4) lanes. (Under construction) , 2. Improve Shepard Road' to three (3) lanes frQrn U.S. 17-92 to Sheoah Boulevard. (County portion) , . 3. Improve East Lake Drive from two (2) lanes to four (4) lanes. (Under design) - '--- State 1. Improve V.S; 17-92 from Seminola Boulevard to SR 419 from four (4) lanes to eight (8) lanes. (Construction fopix (6] lanes completed.) :2. Improve SR 434 from U.S. 17-92 to Moss Road from five (5) lanes to seven (7) lanes. 3. Improve SR 434 from SR 419 to Eastern Beltway from four (4) lanes to six (6) laneS. 4. Improve SR 4 19 from SR 434 to U.S. 17-92 from two (2) lanes to four (4) lanes. T:.I.J l' J (, :2 () J () It 0 1\ J) N C1-~ J) S CITY OF WINT(H SPRINGS FUNI))i'.'(: (ncviscd ] 2/99) Ph:1se ) The following improvements sho'uld be undertaken by the City at the earliest possible date: 1. Improve Panama Road from Moss Road to Edgemon Avenue. (Completed) 2. Improve Hayes Road north of Bahama Road to existing paving on Hayes. (Completed) " 3. Improve Moss Road from Panama Road north to existing'paving on Moss Road. (Completed) 4. Replace Hayes Road bridge. (Completed) 5. Replace Moss Road bridge. (Completed) Phase II 1. Paving and drainage improvements to Bahama Road from Shore Road to Hayes Road. 2. Paving and drainage hnprovements to Panama Road from Shore Road to Moss Road. (Completed) . . 3. Paving and drainage improvements to Fisher Road from Panama Roa<;l to City Limits. - ---- ",-'"" 4. Add stacking lanes to Hayes Road at the SR 434 intersection. (Completed) Phase III 1. Upgrade Moss Road from SR 434 to SR 419 from two hines to four lanes. ,. ,,2. Improve Tuskawilla Road north ofSR 434 (formerly Brantley Avenue). (Switch project from developer funded to impact fee.) 3. Construct Town Center collector road to accommodate new developmenL Roads will connect SR 434 and Tuskawilla Road for collection traffic from this area. Phase IV 1. Improve Winter Springs Boulevard to three lane capability from Northern Way to Northern Way (east section). This will be accomplished by adding turn lanes at each intersection for both traffic flow directions. ,. ,~~ ::l '-~'K :o~ =. , ~:J 5n ., - ~ ..: ~: r.l ~ , :.. ~ ~ % : :~>C"l b ! '~ ~,'~~ i :l I ,,'" "r:'\ Co I .1.- r:'\ \ ~::~~::l:t " ~,~ ~ ~~ 0 1 ~;: - 3' I ;:; " ~ "- VI :- ("'j > "" ,... ! !":'. .~ " v, .' " .: " " .. ~ :D ,~ -' ~, ,Ii v -. c..q ~ z -, D ~ -i :J <; > .... z > (/) -< 'C '. 0 r.1 ~ ...J --, -:i > 0 ::J :!) 0 ?' Z ~ ." ,0 -< 11 > 5 I C W :D m G> ,... s VI ,... o "" , " I " " CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS 2010 FUTURE TRAFFIC CIRCULATION MAP ............./..,... .1 ..,......... ..----,' Irllll ,/ ...... co '-' <:: a. ". ~ -N- ~ .... . ,. - - - = .-- "",. .... (:':15 TINe ROAO'''A'r'"S .' I( ". ~ ':.:..-, ta.JC::O ':.: "-, STAT'( ANO CO'J~'N il,;,":': 11':( r...::; '... .. . :l" <: ... { ..' ~ \ t~..,... "'...::: ."n;,,:,,,;_' ~ UUIiICIPAL IUP..CT ic: i','''=:: ~c.(..~t' 1"."::: I....II;..-:....~...: \ I"" i : I , ~ : ....I~..-; ..1..:\ Fi.)Ncno.\'A'. CLASS:i':.. :".:--':""""'u PA '.:"'0"', ..:tll': ~A .":,.0 ..'t..', RA 'v.... ..ro."" ~C ....,.. '0.',::'0' CMC (C..-", .'.." ".1:'" <T- ... .. \.. ..1:.'" "0"(: :~\ :;~.:~?;":.:'t:..:~:';,.I~' IiUUBER 0; LAN" S (4.) "'.TV,:. C1' I:~"l' ~..~s l.'OTt: 10C!v.1t1 .,:1 VJ=-":, ...< ~.: '.1.:\ i , I i I I I I' I \ \ I I I ] ] } I I ] ] I 1 I I I I EXISTING and PROJECTED DEVELOPMENT by TRAFFIC ZONE , '. - '--- ,,,.'.' - , ,. :,"',~ " "':"I:n."',.",,~, ~ "'....rn:/ . ...... . ........ .hy~~.......~...~~~~n:( ~ 'J;t:~~':~~'Ji ~ill~' l~~~ 7i 8 Tuscawil/a Unit 11 775 Chelsea Woods ?7 5 Bear Creek Estates i/5 Cheslnut Estates \ I I '" 72 72 72 72 72 72 Eaoles Watch Howell Creek Creeks Run Courtney Springs Kash n' Karry Center Yeaoer Commercial 8'2 8'2 82 82 8'2 82 8'2 62 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 S2 82 82 82 Tuscawilla Unit 11 B ' Tuscawilla Unit 12 Arrowheao Unit 1 (Parcels 3,4,51 Fairway Oaks Wood stream Greenbriar Wicklow Greens Chesea Parc phase 2 Chelsea Parc Phase 3(Fox Glerlj. Chelsea Parc Phase 4(Fox Glen II) Bentley Green Bentley Club Glen Eagle Units 1,2 & 3 Carrington Woods Davenport Glen Chestnut Ridge Tuscawilla Unit #13 Braewick Tuscawilla Unit 7 783 iS3 783 763 783 783 Tuscawilla Unit 8 Tuscawilla Unit 9 & 98 Casa Park Villas Tuscany Place Indian Trails Middle School Keeth Elementary 84 a~ Schrimsher Town Center The ReseNe at Tuscawllla .... 12/07/1999 66 321 67 51 505 110 153 50 313 28 90 o "\ 72 32 172 17 36 57 15 44 41 257 76 70 52 39 85 79 1262 78 164 242 80 80 ;~raD'Ii'~_' ]:/!l~..,,~~~IlH$~.. '.. ~ .: ...,' !2'O:~:~~J.'~~!~~~'~ ... .. Mt-: ....."'. . ~....... ~<;~~~ \.:~~ " ~.v... " . . . 4;t. ...'t.....~., .. .~~Aw:;.~...<<~.....:1:..t ~m~l~ft~'RlH~ ~$.O' :lllff:l ,: ,f:.r; m~ '~t#~' ' 't,'cP:;':H m'~'\l 11,<:1~~~{ll;. ~>';;;''l<(ll' Ml~" ,(~~~<l . ~l"'" , ~'. " "-,', ',~~t,'::l:%:~~ ~.'+ ". ~..~~~ u~..~~~ .~. ::':'~ ..~~ ~~~ :: t.~'U::~ ~ ,t" ~~"'::~:::':::~:::::::: ~W.f).lf~\"l~ y",,*ull "....,1...." ,^~,!l~~ K"~:<.~l~I~R~ .",<:..~.""m::~ 252 252 316 79 395 o o o , I I 0 o o o o o 1 1 2 o o Page 1.of 6 o o o o 32 32 <1 acres 4 acres o o 3 17 31 5 26 82 o o o 65 o 65 o 16.3 Acres o 12 12 o 16.3 Acres o ATTACHMENT B . ,-" ..,.. - . --- . - .. ,- . -' -' ,~ '-"".'" V"C lVI/'\r; LV""~\.:I MAl' I HA/:I-IL: GIRGULATION ' ELEMENT MAPS AND TEXT AND ADDITION OF POUCY STATEMENTS FOR CONSERVATION AND RESOURCE PROTECTION. ' ....'t:. CITY OF' WINTER SPRINGS .} ...... ',: I. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE CIlY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS PROPOSES . ~ ro ADOPT THE FOl,LoWING ORDINANCES TO CHANGE THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATIONS: W ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, SEMINOLE COUN1Y, FLORIDA'ADOPTING A LARGE <:. . SCAlE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT, (LS-CPA:1.QO) CHANGING THE FUTURE lAND,USE MAP ,: ' DESIGNATION FROM (SEMINOLE COUNTY) .SUBURBANESTATES. TO (CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS) , 'GREENEWAY INTERCHANGE DISTRICT" ON'THE 67,85 ACRE PARCEL (AKA THE EUZABETH MORSE' - ,=OUNDATION PROPERTY) LOCATED ON THEWEST SIDE OF S.R. 417 ~THE GREENEWAY., NORTH OF S.R, ' ~"SOUTH OF LAKE JESSUP AND EAST OF SPRING AVENUE: PURSUANT TO 166.041 flORIDA 3TATUTES; PROViDING FOR SEVERABIUTY; CONFUCTS AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE, (SEE MAP .A. RELAT- NG TO TH~S AMENDMENT)" , ;: >oN ORDINANCE OF THE CiTY OF WINTER SPRINGS, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA ADOPTING A LARGE ' , ,CALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (LS-CPA-4.QO) CHANGING THE FiJrURE LAND USE MAP , , lESIGNATION FROM .MIXED USE" TO THE NEW "TOWN CENTER" DESIGNATION ON AN 18+/, ACRE PAR, ' ,; :EL LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE FOOT RETENTION BASIN JUST EAST OF THE U,S. POST ::: )FFICE ON THE SOUTH SIDE, OF THE CURVE ALONG S.R. 434; PURSUANT TO 166,041 FLORIDA : ' nATUTES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILIlY, CONFUCTS AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE, (SEE MAP .B. RELAT, , :' NG TO THIS AMENDMENT) \N OR'DINANCE OF THE CIlY OF WINTER SPRINGS, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA ADOPTING A LARGE ;CAlE COMPREHENSIVE PlAN AMENDMENT (LS-CPA-5.QO) CHANGING THE ,FUTURE:'!,AND USE MAP, ~ lESIGNATlON FROM .MODERATE DENSIlY RESIDENTIAL" (3.6, 6.5 DU PER ACRE) AND .CONSERVATION" ,;' '0 THE NEW.TOwN CENTER. DESIGNATION ON AN APPROXIMATELY 34,64 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON ~ 'HE WEST SIDE OFTUSKAWIUA ROAD ACROSS FROM THE FORMER HI.FLAVOR MEAT PLANT BOUNDED, " IN THE NORTH SIDE BY MIlKY WAY AVE, AND ON THE SOUTH SIDE BY OAK FOREST UNIT 7 SUBDIVISION. : .. SEE MAP .C. RELATING TO THIS AMENDMENT) .N ORDINANCE OF THE CIlY OF WINTER SPRINGS, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA DOPTING AN EMER, lENCY LARGE SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (LS-EM-CPA-1.Q1) CHANGING THE FUTURE' ( AND USE MAP DESIGNATION FORM .COMMERCIAL" TO THE .MEqIUM DENSITY,RESIDENTIAL" DESIGNA, '':"' lDN ON AN APPI;lOXIMATlEY 36,21 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDE OF S,R. 434 AND,: ", IN TI:lE EAST AND WEST SIDE OF MOSS ROAD IN GENERAL PROXIMIlY TO THE S,R: 434 AND MOSS ' : lOAD INTERSECTION, (SEE MAP "D~ RELATING'TO THIS AMENDMENT) , ;- . : . . ~. . oN ORDIANCE OF THE CIlY,OF WINTER SPIRNGS, SEMINOLE COUN1Y, FLORIDA,AoOPllNG A CHANGe :" IF ZONING (REZ-3-01) CHANGING THE ZONING MAP DESIGNATION FROM C-1 .NElGHBORHOOD COM- ' :' IERCIAL""TO ZONING DESIGNATION R'3,.MULTI,FAMILY DWEWNG. DISTRICT'ON APPROXIMATELY 35' , CRES LOCATED IN AND AROUND THE iNTERSECTION OF MOSS ROAD AND STATE ROAD 434 (SEE MAP :. ~. RELo.TfN~ TO TH.IS ~EZONING) ";-, , ;,,' , " ;' , " ,; N ORpiNANCE OFT1;i:'CriY OF WINTER 'SPRINGS, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIOA' ADOPTING A SMALL CALE COMPRHENSNE PlAN AMENDMENT'(SS-CPA;2.Q1) CHANGING THE FUTURE LAND USE MA DES- . lNATlON FROM (COUNTY) .COMMERCIAL", .INDUSTRIAL", AND .LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL" TO (CITY) I ' 'ESIGNATfON ,.INDUSTRIAL" ON AN APPROXIMATELY 6.2 ACRES LOCATED ON NURSERY,ROAD JUST ,~:-: ~,TO!. YJ: 17/92.(~!=E MAP"F" RE,LATING Tonus AME~D,MENT) .,.',;" : ': NORDINANCE OF THE CIlY OF WINTER'SP.RINGS. SEMiNOLECOUN1Y, FLORIDA ADOPTING A CHANGE; " 'F, ~9NING '(REz;2.:o~ )CI;lANGING :rHEZONING MAP DESIGf:JATION FROM (COUNl:vl C-2~RETAJl COM- , ': IERq~i:~:.,GEN~COMI,lERCIA~ &WHOLESALE~"R;1,~ .Il,lNGLEFAMILY DWEWNG.'TO (CITY)' QNING:I)ESIGNATlON,C-2 ~GENERA1. COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL"OISTRICT ON APPROXIMATELY ,6,2 , qRel(tocAT,ED ON/'lUJ;lSERY RO,6,D JUST EASTOF 'u,i;:f7/92(SEE i.w~,:a. fl~!.ATfNQ TO THI$RE?ON' ,. ':W;.{\.;~..'.~.) ';:~)\.:.:~;..':. ;.' :' ':. :~":'''''..' ::',' :~:~~ ~':~l:., '('~~?<\>"'" ;. -< ~;. : : . ", '~'.. '-t" . '. .':: ~: '.~' ~. Ij;PF.iRI~,CE Of,if.i~::CIlY OF WlNTERS~!lINGS;:SEMjNPLE couNTY, F,LORIO*'APOPTlNG A LARGE~'i~. ~..c:.oMPR.EHEN~!VE, PLf.N ,AMEND"1Et-/.T(I,S,cPA~O) W!'fICH ,WOULDCOMPLETE~Y,REPl.f..CE THE,,: W ,At.-I,J?:.:~S 1,~11:lETf:V\FFlC CIRCULAWt:I,EU;MENT INV<:>WME 1 OF 2 ANQ~ OF~, '.':. :,:,,:, ,',' ,:',; ~' ..},9Rq!tiNC~.of:'THE CIlY OF WI~'SP~I~GS; SEMINOLE GOy'~ M~i.DA Aoo,PjlN(lTHR~\i~)'! .' \I'IaE?~!CQMPREHENSNE PlAN-AMENDMENT PROPOSALS (LG-CPA-2;3.4-98) ToAqD\E?CT.,TO I' :' ~:~D.,Ul!E, ELSM,E!'lT AND ,THE,COt-jS,ERVATfON ELEMENT:AND I!'ITER~OV!:RNI,lI;NTAlc:q9!WI/IlP..;; QN'ELEMENT.'THESE PROPOSED AMeNDMENTS SEE~ TO:,F.URTHERENSUR~'t-lODESTRUCTlOt'(9Ft;': ~ETAT\ON AND WILDUFE.,LOSS OF SlqNJ~ICANT CUI.TURAL,AND ARCHEOLDGIcp'/" R~OURCES~O"!:i : ' lTY-QwNED PROPERTY, AND' ,THAT "THE CIlY Will COORDINATE W11'H THE'RESOURCE PROTECTlON" ' '#1s OF,LD~. STATE. ANDFEbERAl"JURiSDICTlOtls~iNTHE NEW,foWN CE~ DISTRIcT.':'::'; '/" , '~."~.i,--. ........\, :, .~~.;:-. .'....~ ":. .!. ~;:".,'~ '..'.:,._:.......;:..~'.::.... '". "'. ::':'_~~ "::' "t._,. ". :" .'~"";" : ' ";., f.E:~rrY.$:9'Mi,.1'I~SIPfl:WiIi:~~OLD A: fiRst, ~~i~~,hF:'TB~ABOvi:.()~DiNAN~ ON' MAACH21;2091" I, I ~..~=90~~~i~p: WILI;~H(M ~ S~CON,D (AD?PT!9N),~~~l;!9, ~~I~G,01:J ~,E,A89VE9R?!,~P~,0~' " I IJ.~~:~oi~W~~J~i.~~^~~I~\!~~i.- . j.' lQ!l1Qf:oIAl...INFORMATfON PERTAINING TO THE ABqVE'MAY ,BE, O,6TAlNE~ F.J;lOM THE 9.FFIC~9.s Tl:is:~ " 'I, E;R~/'?,~~8~:I-N':9~T'P.t-I:<?~,(4?~ :j,?~;,),~~,~~t~.\:;""~."..;,,.. ,:,';., :~. ,~:",:","'<!.:", ~qNS;Y'Wl DI~ll,J,TIES NEEDING ASSISTANCE TP, P'f'JlJlc.lr~T;(t~#'IY,O, F,JHESE'PRqCEEDI.NG~,; , : ~9.8P'igq!i".A,CT',Tl'!~,tiu~ RESOURCES G09RDI~tO~":~~'10u.~S;!~ApVANc:~ OFT,Hf: MEETlN~ ' ;, I '~_~~~:\F~YQP'O;C@~b:~P'~~~,~166~~~;~~6~~k~~f~~~:E&;k~!; ~;<'" ,g i rrcoMM~~NV MA'm:!R'CONS'CEREO'AT-~ElmNO~YOtwJtU~EEO'A ,_~'-'-c,' ~,:\q ,Qf,Ttf!' ,P,RO~~I~f3S, AN.PiI5RR:~Uc::H ,PURPOSES I: YOU!MAY ~~qIJQ,:~NSh',RET)-tAT A,YE;R.' \'rt~RE<;:ORP.9f. ~E PROC~Eplt,!.GS,Il?:~DE UPON ~t;I~H, THEAPPEA~'i~t(r~~ ~AS,~9:, ' , : ' ~"> ,:';.. " >:,:,,-;~;{ ::::;'~;~:,/;: ,'::, ,~~,(/f\'i~~i:.L,,:j '" ,<l~:'::':{Yl!i:>th', , ""~ i' , ~r-,'J':.;i": 'C.' ':' C:~' ..::;,~:, " "\"~""\'q' '....,,' '" " ,"," ",,,L. ., ~~,.:~,":,':,'"~",:'.~,,'CLERK:,',,, LO~ '.... ..'. ':f':ffE::;?!.\C!;!"':'7[e?"f;,!:~," ~~ """.1..1, :..... ",~_:",,~,: ',: .(.):.::.~'-('.: f." .~.~ . ;', . ,.::, io:r ~~' , .f I I \ I I I I " ,--- .-----'- .......-. ;i' \ '~ ,~ ' '"",- -,;; ~~i~H~<<~i#~yt{~~~~f~~nn~~~#~*~i~~~~~; '--., -" --~, '~--.JL ......". MAl' . . rwvu....,.. -rcu flUTCW) , U>ll J(W" ~ L :" .' :(..- .. '" :!'. " '" ,~. , ...\.......~:..' ", 1/. .:~. r