HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001 03 26 Public Hearings C Second Reading - Ordinance 2001-20 Future Land Use Map Designation
COMMISSION AGENDA
ITEM
c
Consent
Informational
Public Hearing X
Regular
March 26, 2001
Meeting
~
Mgr. / Attor / ~.
Authorization .
REQUEST:
The Community Development Department - Planning Division requests the City Commission
hold a public hearing for second reading of Ordinance 2001-20 to adopt the large scale
comprehensive plan amendment (LS-CPA-5-00) that would change the Future Land Use Map
designation of the property from (County) "Medium Density Residential" (max, 10 DU per acre)
to (City) designation "Town Center", on property located on the west side of Tuskawilla Road
and adjacent on the south side of Milky Way Ave,
PURPOSE:
The purpose of this Agenda Item is to request the Commission hold a public hearing for second
reading of Ordinance 2001-20 to change the Future Land Use Map designation to allow
development of the property according to the requirements of the "Town Center" and its
associated Town Center District Code,
APPLICABLE LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY:
The provisions of Florida Statutes Chapter 163,3184(15)(b) F.S, which state: "The local
governing body shall hold at least one advertised public hearing on the proposed comprehensive
plan or plan amendment as follows:
I, The first public hearing shall be held at the transmittal stage pursuant to subsection
(3), It shall be held on a weekday at least 7 days after the day that the
advertisement is published,
CDD/March 19,2001/2:40 PM
MARCH 26, 2001
PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM C
Page 2
2, The second public hearing shall be held at the adoption stage pursuant to
subsection (7), It shall be held on a weekday at least 5 days after the day that the
second advertisement is published,"
The provisions of 166,041(3)(a) which state in part: "Except as provided in paragraph (c), a
proposed ordinance may be read by title, or in full, on at least 2 separate days and shall, at least 10
days prior to adoption, be noticed once in a newspaper of general circulation in the municipality,"
CONSIDERATIONS:
· The City Commission annexed Property 2 (29 acres) on April 10, 2000, Property 3
(0,836 acres) was annexed into the City on August 14,2000 for a total of29,836 acres,
· CHC Development, Inc, originally submitted a large scale plan amendment application that
included Property 1, Property 2 and Property 3 for a total of 148 acres" The transmittal
sent to DCA included all three parcels, DCA reviewed the proposed plan amendment
including all three parcels and issued an ORC Report on it. Since then, CHC
Development, Inc, withdrew from consideration Property 1, leaving 29,836 acres in the
proposed plan amendment.
· The Florida Department of Community Affairs issued its ORC (Objections,
Recommendations, and Comments) Report on January 26,2001,
· The Local Planning Agency at its March 7,2001 meeting reviewed the ORC Report and
the Response to the ORC Report and made its recommendation to the City Commission,
· On March 21,2001, the Commission approved the first reading of Ordinance 2001-20 to
adopt the large scale comprehensive plan amendment (LS-CP A-5-00) that would change
the Future Land Use Map designation of the property from (County) "Medium Density
Residential" (max, 10 DU per acre) to (City) designation "Town Center", on property
located on the west side of Tuskawilla Road and adjacent on the south side of Milky Way
Ave.
CDD/March 19,2001/5:02 PM
MARCH 26, 2001
PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM C
Page 3
FINDINGS:
.
CRC Development, Inc, has reduced the area for consideration in the plan amendment to
29,836 acres instead of the original 148 acres, As a result of this reduction of area for
consideration, a substantial area of wetland is no longer part of the plan amendment.
.
Wetlands do exist on the subject property although the exact location and extent of these
wetlands are not known at present because a jurisdictional wetland boundary has not been
established by the appropriate governmental agency,
.
Wetland delineation on the City's Future Land Use Map and the County's Future Land
Use Map are understood to be approximations and only at the time of site development
review they required to be accurately delineated, [ref: Goal 2, Objective A, Policy
3)b, of the Land Use Element and in Goal 1, Objective C, Policy 5)a, of the Conservation
Element]
.
The Future Land Use Map will be modified to reflect the presence of wetlands on the
subject property, [ref: Goal 1, Objective B, Policy 1 of the Conservation Element]
.
There is a well established permit application process in the development of property,
whereby a detailed analysis is conducted by the 8t. Johns River Water Management
District (and sometimes other agencies) to determine the location, extent, and type of on-
site wetlands, [ref.: Goal 1 , Objective C, Policy 5)a, of the Conservation Element]
.
The Florida Department of Community Affairs recognizes the permit application process
of the 8t. Johns River Water Management District for preservation of wetlands,
.
The City's Comprehensive Plan provides for preservation of environmentally sensitive
areas through creation of an environmental easement either indicated on the plat for the
development or by a separate instrument approved by the City, [ref.: Goal 2, Objective A,
Policy 3)c, of the Land Use Element]
.
The "Town Center" Future Land Use Map designation allows for flexibility of mixed use
development and provides a maximum residential density of 36 DU per acre but does not
determine specifically the mix of uses or minimum densities, The City has the authority at
the time of development review to require a traffic impact study that can specifically relate
to what the development is proposed, rather than request a traffic impact study based on
any number of mix of uses and densities.
CDD/March 19,2001/2:40 PM
MARCH 26, 2001
PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM C
Page 4
.
The City has a Concurrency Management requirement in its Comprehensive Plan that can
ensure adequate public facilities and services are available or programmed at the time of
development.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None,
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
A public hearing for second reading and adoption of Ordinance 2001-20 is scheduled for
March 26,2001. The ordinance would become effective after 21 days of the issue of "Notice of
Intent" by the Florida Department of Community Affairs to find the large scale comprehensive
plan amendment in compliance, [ref: 163,3184(10)(a) F,S, ]
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Commission hold a public hearing for second reading and adoption of
Ordinance 2001-20 to change the Future Land Use Map designation of the CHC Development,
Inc, Tuskawilla Road Site property from (County) "Medium Density Residential" to (City)
"Town Center" designation on the Future Land Use Map, incorporating the City staff and the
Local Planning Agency's Findings, and the Response to the ORC Report as the basis for the
adoption of the plan amendment.
LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY RECOMMENDATION:
The Local Planning Agency at its March 7, 2001 meeting recommended the City Commission
approve the change of Future Land Use Map designation of the CHC Development, Inc,
Tuskawilla Road Site property from (County) "Medium Density Residential" to (City) "Town
Center" designation on the Future Land Use Map, incorporating the City staff and the Local
Planning Agency's Findings, and the Response to the ORC Report as the basis for the adoption of
the plan amendment.
CDD/March 19,200112:40 PM
MARCH 26, 2001
PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM C
Page 5
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Ordinance 2001-20
B, Ad in Orlando Sentinel
ORC Report for Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment LS-CP A-5-00,
[ See Local Planning Agency Agenda Item [I, E. Attachment 1 ]
Response to the ORC Report for LS-CP A-5-00
[ See Local Planning Agency Agenda Item II, E. Attachment 2 ]
LS-CP A-5-00 Plan Amendment Original Data & Analysis Submission Included in the Transmittal
to the Florida Department of Community Affairs,
[ See Local Planning Agency Agenda Item II"E, Attachment 3 ]
COMMISSION ACTION:
CDD/March 19,2001/2:40 PM
ATTACHMENT A
"
ORDINANCE 2001-20
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA, ADOPTING A
LARGE SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AMENDMENT (LS-CPA-5-00) CHANGING THE
FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION FROM
"MODERA TE DENSITY RESIDENTIAL" (3.6-6.5 DU
ACRE) AND "CONSERV A TION" TO THE NEW "TOWN
CENTER" DESIGNATION ON AN APPROXIMA TEL Y
38.37 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE
OF TUSCA WILLA ROAD ACROSS FROM THE
FORMER HI-FLAVOR MEAT PLANT BOUNDED ON
THE NORTH SIDE BY MILKY WAY AVENUE;
PROVIDING FOR INCORPORATION INTO THE
COMPREHEN'SIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY; CONFLICTS AND AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, section 163.3161 et Seq., Florida Statutes (1987) established the Local
Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act; and
WHEREAS, section 163.3167, Florida Statutes, requires each municipality in the State
of Florida to prepare and adopt a Comprehensive Plan as scheduled by the Florida Department of
Community Affairs; and
WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency ofthe City of Winter Springs held a duly noticed
public hearing, in accordance with the procedures in Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, on the
proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment and considered findings and advice of staff, citizens,
and all interested parties submitting written and oral comments and has recommended adoption to
the City Commission; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to section 9J-lI.006, Florida Administrative Code, this
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No, 200] -20
Page I of 5
Comprehensive Plan amendment will not cause the City to exceed its twice yearly submittal
allowance for comprehensive plan amendments; and
WHEREAS, on November 13,2000, the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs
held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment and
considered findings and advice of staff, citizens, and all interested parties submitting written and
oral comments, and after complete deliberation, approved the amendment for transmittal to the
Florida Department of Community Affairs; and
WHEREAS, on January 26, 200 I, the Florida Department of Community Affairs issued
its Objections, Recommendations, and Comments Report ("ORC Report") to the City and made
recommendations to bring the subject Comprehensive Plan amendment in compliance with Rule
9J-5, Florida Administrative Code, and Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes,
WHEREAS, the City Commission and the Land Planning Agency have reviewed and
evaluated the ORC Report and 'have made certain modifications to the Comprehensive Plan
amendment originally transmitted to the Florida Department of Community Affairs in order to
bring the amendment into compliance with Rule 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code and Chapter
163, Part II, Florida Statutes; and
WHEREAS, on March 26, 2001, the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs held
a duly noticed public adoption hearing on the proposed plan amendment set forth hereunder and
considered findings and advice of staff, citizens, and all interested parties submitting written and
oral comments and supporting data and analysis, and after complete deliberation, hereby finds the
requested change consistent with the City of Winter Springs' Comprehensive Plan; and
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No, 2001-20
Page 2 of 5
WHEREAS, the City Commission hereby finds that this Ordinance is in the best interests
of the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Winter Springs, Florida; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER
SPRINGS HEREBY ORDAINS, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are fully incorporated
herein by this reference.
Section 2. Authority. This Ordinance is adopted in compliance with, and pursuant to, the
Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulations Act.
Section 3. Purpose and Intent. It is hereby declared to be the purpose and intent of this
Ordinance to change the Future Land Use Map designation of the approximate 38.37 acre parcel
generally known as the CHC Development, Inc. Tuscawilla Road site property from Seminole
County future land use map designation "medium density residential" to City Future Land Use Map
designation "Town Center".
Section 4. Adoption of Amendment to the Future Land Use Map. The City of Winter
Springs' Comprehensive Plan, Future Land Use Map, is hereby amended by designating the real
property depicted as property two (including legal description) on Exhibit" 1" from future land use
map designation "medium density residential" to future land use map designation "Town Center".
Exhibit "1" is attached hereto and fully incorporated herein by this reference.
Section 5. Transmittal to the Department of Community Affairs. The City Manager
or his designee is hereby designated to sign a letter, transmitting the adopted Comprehensive Plan
Amendment to the Florida Department of Community Affairs, in accordance with Section
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No, 2001-20
Page 3 of 5
163,3 I 87(1)(c)(4), Florida Statutes, and the corresponding prOVISIOns of the Florida
Administrative Code,
Section 6. Repeal of Prior Inconsistent Ordinances and Resolutions. All prior
inconsistent ordinances and resolutions adopted by the City Commission, or parts of ordinances
and resolutions in conflict herewith, are hereby repealed to the extent of the conflict.
Section 7. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, word or
provision of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of
competent jurisdiction, whether for substantive, procedural, or any other reason, such portion shall
be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance.
Section 8. Incorporation into Comprehensive Plan. Upon the effective date of the
Comprehensive Plan Amendment adopted by this Ordinance, said Amendment shall be
incorporated into the City of Winter Springs' Comprehensive Plan and any section or paragraph
number or letter and any heading may be changed or modified as necessary to effectuate the
foregoing.
Section 9,
Effective Date and Legal Status ofthe Plan Amendments. The effective
date of the Comprehensive Plan Amendments adopted by this Ordinance shall be the date a final
order is issued by the Florida Department of Community Affairs, or the Administration
Commission finding the Amendments in compliance with section 163.3184, Florida Statutes. No
development orders, development permits, or land use dependent on these Amendments may be
issued or commenced before it has become effective. If a final order of noncompliance is issued
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No, 2001-20
Page 4 of 5
by the Administration Commission, the Amendments may nevertheless be made effective by
adoption of a resolution affirming its effective status, After and from the effective date of these
Amendments, the Comprehensive Plan Amendments set forth herein shall amend the City of
Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan and become a part of that plan and the Amendments shall
have the legal status of the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan, as amended.
ADOPTED by the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, l'lorida~ in a r~~uJar
J , ,',
meeting assembled on the 26th day of March, 2001.
A1;TEST:
. )\ ~ ),
~drea Loren'--
d as to legal form and sufficiency for
inter Springs only
mey
First Reading: March 21, 2001
Second Reading: March 26. 2001
Effective Date:
F:\DOCS\City of Winter Springs\Ordinances\CHC - Town Center - Large Scale Flum - Tuskawilla Rd and Milky Way Ave
,/ ,
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No, 2001-20
Page 5 of 5
-.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOTS 25 THROUGH 32. 39 THROUGH 48. 56 THROUGH 64 THOSE PORTIONS OF
LOTS 37. 38. 53. 54 AND 55 LYING WEST OF TUSCAWILLA ROAD. TUSCAWILLA.
AS SHOWN ON D.R. MITCHELL'S SURVEY OF THE LEVY GRANT. ACCORDING
TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS 'RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1. PAGE 5. PUBLIC
RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY. FLORIDA. TOGETHER WITH ALL RIGHTS OF
WAY LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE ABOVE LOTS AS VACATED BY RESOLUTION
RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1050. PAGE 401. PUBLIC RECORDS
OF SEMINOLE COUNTY. FLORIDA. LESS THE EAST HALF OF THE RIGHT OF
WAY LYING ADJACENT TO LOTS 25 AND 26 ON THE WEST AND LOTS 23 AND
24 ON THE EAST;
LESS AND EXECPT FROM THE ABOVE THE FOLLOWING;
THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 37.38.53. 54 AND 55. TAKEN FOR ROAD RIGHT
OF WAY FOR TUSCAWILLA ROAD DESCRIBED IN ORDER OF TA~ING RECORDED
IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 3603. PAGE 1095. PUBLIC RECORDS OF
SEMINOLE COUNTY. FLORIDA.
CONTAINS 38.37 ACRES +/-.
EXHIBIT
'~
.,
i
\
(
----------,
--\--_.
r--- " \
\ \ \
\ \ \
I \
\ \ \
. \ '
\ \ \'
\ '---~-- \.
I ~\
\ '
\ r----- -'~
I
I
\
.
I
\
,
I
\
I
.
\
I
I
\
I
,
\
I
I
L_____
------
I
P ROP(R lY ON(
i--------/
,
I
,
,
I
,
I
I
PROP(RTY TWO
(
Property
Boundary Map
BoWYER
Sii\IGlE1DN
& AssOCIATES, INCORPORATED
(HCIN(("IHC . PlANNING. SUIlV(YINC . [NVI"OHM(H'A.I
Prepared For:
CHC Development Co,. Inc_
520 SOUTH MAGNOLIA AVENUE
ORlANDO, FLORIDA 32801
(407) 843-5120
FAX. 407-649-8664
EXHIBIT
}
.D
lJ
L
~
Nor1h
Tuskawilla
Road Site
Comprehensive Policy
Plan Amendment
7-20-00
TSV/I
ATTACHMENT B
OTHER ATTACHMENTS
ORC Report for Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment LS-CPA-5-00,
[ See Local Planning Agency Agenda Item II. E. Attachment 1 ]
Response to the ORC Report for LS-CP A-5-00
[ See Local Planning Agency Agenda Item II, E, Attachment 2 ]
LS-CP A-5-00 Plan Amendment Original Data & Analysis Submission Included in the Transmittal
to the Florida Department of Community Affairs.
[ See Local Planning Agency Agenda Item II. E. Attachment 3 ]
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND c;OMMENTS
FOR THE
,CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
, AMENDMENT 01-1
January 26, 2001
Division of Community Planning
Bureau of Local Planning
This report is prepared pursuant to Rule 9J-l1.01O
c. Internal Consistency: Because the amendment has not demonstrated consistency with
statutory requirements for protection of natural resources, for coordination of land uses with
transportation facilities and services, for intergovernmental coordination and urban sprawl, the
amendment has not demonstrated internal consistency with the:
Traffic Circulation: Objective B, Policy 1 and 6, requiring coordination, Objective C,
and Policies 1 through 7 requiring level of serVice maintenance, Objective D, Policies 2
and 3;
Future Land Use Element: Goal 2, Objective A, Policies 1 through 3, requiring
protection of natural resources; Goal 3, Objective A and Policy I to prevent urban sprawl;
Conservation: Goal 1 , Objective B, Policies I, 2, 4, and 5, protecting ,natural resources,
Object~ve~, Policies 6 and 7, regarding protection of floodplains and coordination;
Capital Improvements: goal 1, ~bjectiveC~ Policy 1, Transportation LOS
Intergovernmental Coordination: Goal 1, Objective A, Policy 6 regarding
coordination; Objective D, Policy 1 regarding coordination; Objective E, Policy 1,
regarding dispute resolution; Objective F Policy l.b and 3, regarding execution of
interlocal agreement for areas outside City's jurisdiction;
Recommendation: Do not adopt the amendments, A1ternatively~ make necessary revisions as
listed in parts LA.2.a and b above to justify the amendment.
Sections: 163.3177(1), 163.3177(6)(a), 163.3177(6)(c), 163,3177(6)(d),
163.3177(6)0),163.3177(8),163.3187(2), F.S.
Rules: 9J-5,005(2), 9J-5.005(5), 9J-5.006(2)(b) and (c); 9J-5.006(3)(b)3, (b)6, (b) 1 0 and (c)2;
9J-5.006(4); 9J-5.006(5), 9J-5.013(2), F.A.C.
3. Amendment LS-CP A-5-00 (Tuscawilla): '
a. Suitability Based on Natural Resources and Facilities:
, The City proposes a Land Use Map amendment revising 148 acres from Mixed use to Town
Center. Staff could not identify, based on the package, how current conservation'areas totaling
+ 100 acres will be treated under the current land use amendment proposal. The current future
land use map shows the area as conservation and the text indicates that sonie areas will be
retained conservation, None of the proposed maps reflect the conservation intent, Policies in the
Town Center Category require jurisdictional wetlands be reflected as conserVation.
- .
Furthermore, it is unclear what the impacts to roadway facilities and services Will be since the
analyses do not include an adequate assessment of available and projected capacity based on the
adopted level of services. FDOT commented the City lacked an adequate analysis,
Recommendation: Make applicable revisions as recommended in Part LA.l.a.
4
b. Internal Consistency: Because the amendment has not demonstrated consistency with
statutory requirements for protection of natural resources, and for coordination of land uses with
transportation facilities and services, amendment has not demonstrated internal consistency with
the City's goals, objectives and policies of the comprehensive plan as listed:
Traffic Circulation: Objective B, Policy 1 and 6, requiring coordination, Objective C,
and Policies 1 throl,lgh 7 requiring level of service maintenance, Objective D, Policies 2
and 3;
Future Land Use Element: Goal2, Objective A, Policies 1 through 3, requiring
protection of natural resources; and Goal 4 Objective B, Policies 1,3, and 5, regarding
open space and wetland preservation in Town Center Areas;
Conservation: Goal 1, Objective B, Policies 1,2,4, and 5, protecting natural resources,
Objective c, Policies 6 and 7, regarding protection of floodplains and coordination;
Capital Improvements: goal 1, Objective C, Policy 1, Transportation LOS
Recommendation: Make applic~ble revisions as recommended in Part LA.1.b.
Sections: 163.3177(1), 163.3177(6)(a), 163.3177(6)(c), 163.3177(6)(d),
163.3177(6)0),163.3177(8),163.3187(2), F.S.
Rules: 9J-5.005(2), 9J-5.005(5), 9J-5.006(2)(b) and (c); 9J:.5.006(3)(b)3, (b)6, (b) 1 0 and (c)2;
9J-5.006(4); 9J-5.006(5), 9J-5.013(2), F.A.C.
B. Traffic Circulation Element
1. LS-CP A-6-00: The City has not met the requirements of the Transportation because certain
tables are not consistent with the FDOT work program and the revised element does not include
a current LOS for all roadways in the City.
Recommendation: Revise Tables 14, 15, and Figures 7,8 for SR. 434, CR 419, SR 419, and Us
17-92 to be consistent with the FDOT work program. Reflect applicable roadway improvements
as scheduled in the FDOT work program as was recommended in the original 98-1 ORC.
Furthermore, the City has not revised the listing of facilities in the program to be consistent with
Seminole County. The City should revise the element to demonstrate coordination of facilities
, with the County by including a schedule 'of improvements. '
Other requirements should be met under chapter 163.3177(6)0), F.S., and 9J-5.019(4) and (5),
Florida Administrative Code. The Element should include the current Level of Service for
roadways iii the City. Given that the data is from 1996 and 1997, the City should revisit the
issue to determine if this is still the best available data. The map series should include current
level of service for roadways. The plan includes projected level of service but the table should
, be reviewed to see if the information is still applicable.
Sections: 163.3177(6)(b), 163.3177(6)0), 163,3177(8), F.S.
Rules: 9J-5.006(4), 9J-5.019(4), 9J-5.019(5), F.A.C.
5
Faxt~ -$t7-f755
From
Post-It"' Fax Note 7671
To 1P. rl/11/11~
CoJDept
Phone ,
Dale
Co.
FIlX#
ORe Report
Plan Amendment LS-CPA-5-00
Tuskawilla
City of Winter Springs, Florida
Prepared For
Carl Cahill, CHC Development Company, Inc.
February 2001
Objections, Recommendations, And Comments Report
For the City of Winter Springs
3. Amendment L5-CPA-5-00 (Tuskawilla)
a. Suitability based on Natural Resources and Facilities:
The City proposes a Land Use Map amendment revising 148 acres from Mixed use to
Town Center. Staff could not Identify, based on the package, how current
conservation areas totaling +100 acres will be treated under the current land use
amendment proposal. The current future land use map shows the area as
conservation and the text Indicates that some area will be retained conservation.
. None of the proposed maps reflect the conservation intent. Policies In the Town
Center Category require jurisdictional wetlands be reflected as conservatlon. .
Furthermore, it Is unclear what the impacts to roadway facUities and services will be
since the analyses do not include an adequate assessment of available and projected
capacity based on the adopted level of services. FOOT commented the City lacked an
adequate analysis.
Recommendation: Make applicable revisions as recommended In Part l.A-l.a.
Part I.A-l.a. Recommendation: Revise the amendment to retain the wetland and
floodplain areas in, a conservation land use designation or other designation to protect
the natural resources on-site.
Revise the amendment to Include an adequate transportation analysis. The analyses
should include: 1) An assessment through the planning period of the impacts to
facilities based on the most Intense use Including cumulative Impacts (traffic)
generated by proposed amendments herein; 2) Data and analysis demonstrating
coordination of facilities with the proposed land uses; and 3) An assessment of the
timing of provision of services such that all services are provided at the adopted level
of service.
The analyses should assess the demand for services with regard to available capacity
of services. For example, the City should assess traffic generation with regard to
available capacity on existing roadways based on both the peak hour and the daily
average trips; and should take into account the traffic generated by proposed
amendments contained within this package.
All analyses should be based on the most Intense use proposed for development as
Identified and guIded by the future land use map and future land use element policies,
and should assess impacts In the short-term within five years and through the
planning period (to 2015). Again, using the transportation example, the analysis
should identify current operating LOS for SR 434 and 417, as well as any applicable
local roadways. Include any FIHS facilities. The analysis should then factor in
anticipated Impacts from any proposed amendment such that a comparison of before-
amendment and after-amendment conditions can be made.
The analyses should then identify if and where deficiencies will be realized based on
Tuskawilla - Objections, Recommendations and Comments
Plan Amendment LS-CPA-5-00
February 2001, Page 1 of 4
TSW1\Reports\2000
~, .
','.:J ."."
the LOS maximums as established by the local comprehensive plan and FOOT. This
procedure should be repeated tor a projected LOS through 2005 and 2015. For any
Identified deficiencies within five years, the City should Identify how the deficiency will
be remedied through capital improvements planning Including the amount and source
of funding necessary, the type of project, and the expected timing of the project to
coincide with anticipated demands. If It Is for a facility that Is not within the City's
funding Jurisdiction then the applicable work program (FOOT, and/or County) should
be used to Identify pertInent projects. Any projects needed should then be reflected
through a change to the comprehensive plan and/or corresponding capital
Improvements schedule. For deficiencies identified beyond five years, the City should
Identify the types of planning strategies that will be used to alleviate facility
challenges Including any revisions to the plan that may be necessary. The strategies
should address the overall service network countYwide and take into account the
anticipated operational levels through the planning period.
"
The amendment will be revised to retain the wetland and floodplain areas in a conservation
or a similar land use designation to protect natural resources on site.
The amendment will be revised to include an adequate transportation analysis to include the
following:
. An assessment through the planning period (2015) of the impacts of facilities based
on the most intense use (3.5 dulac) and cumulative Impacts (traffic) generated by
the proposed amendments; .
. Data and analysis demonstrating the coordination of facilities with the proposed land
uses; and
. Assessment of the timing of provision of services such that all services are provided
at the adopted level of service.
The transportation analysis will determine traffic generated by the proposed amendments and
assess the demand for services with regard to available capacity inclUding the following:
.
Analysis of both the existing peak hour and average daily trips;
Traffic generated by proposed amendments;
Assessment of impacts in the short-term (five years) and through the planning period
(2015);
Identification of current operating LOS for SR 434 and 417, applicable local roadways
and FIHS facilities;
Factor the anticipated impacts from the proposed amendment considering existing
and future conditions;
Identify deficiencies based on the existing LOS maximums;
Identify deficiencies based on projected LOS through 2005 and 2015;
For deficiencies identified within five years, the City will identify a remedy through
capital impr<?vements planning;
The FDOT andlor County will be identified for pertinent projects outside the City's
funding jurisdiction;
Any necessary projects will be reflected through a change to the Comprehensive
Plan and/or corresponding capital improvements schedule;
Beyond the five-year timeframe, the City will identify planning strategies to alleviate
facility challenges; and
The City will identify strategies to address the overall service network countywide.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
TSW1\Reports\2000
TuskawiIla - Objections, Recommendations and Comments
Plan Amendment LS-CPA-5-00
February 2001, Page 2 of 4
1>1/" 11'.1\ .) 11.....1....1\1;'
~ Y.:.J 1I t J ..
b. Internal Consistency:
Because the amendment has not demonstrated consistency with statutory
requirements for protection of natural resources, for coordination of land uses with
transportation facilities and services, amendment has not demonstrated Internal
consistency with the City's goals, objectives and policies of the comprehensive plan
as listed:
Traffle Circulation: Objective B, Polley 1 and 6, requiring coordination, Objective C,
and Policies 1 and 7 requiring level 01 service maintenance, Objective 0, Policies 2
and 3;
Futuro Land Use Element: Goal 2, Objective A, Policies 1 through 3, requiring
protection of natural resources; Goal 4, ObJecUve B, Polley 1, 3, and 5, regarding open
space and wet/and preservation in Town Center Areas;
Conservation: Goal 1. Objective 5, Policies 1, 2, 4, and 5, protecting natural resources,
Objective c, Policies 6 and 7, regarding protection 01 floodplains and coordination;
Capital Improvements: Goal 1 , Objective C, Polley 1, Tmnsportation LOS
Recommendation: Make applicable revisions as recommended In Part I.A-l.b.
Part I.A.l.b. Recommendation: Retain the conservation area as recommended and
perform the necessary analyses for transportation as recommended. Revise the
amendment as necessary to be supported by the conservation and transportation
data.
Response: The amendment will be made as recommended in Part 1.A.l.b. The amendment
will retain the conservation area as recommended and the City will perform the necessary
transportation analYses.
Tuskawilla - Objections, Recommendations and Comments
Plan Amendment LS-CPA-5-00
Febrnary 2001, Page 3 of4
TSW 1 \Reports\2000
"
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
, 1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708-2799
Telephone (407) 327-1800
Community Development DepL
Planning Division
LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY REGULAR AGENDA ITEM:
II. G.
CHC TUSKAWILLA ROAD SITE LARGE SCALE PLAN
AMENDMENT (LS-CP A-S-OO)
STAFF REPORT:
APPLICABLE LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY:
The provisions of 163,31'74(4) Florida Statutes which state "Be the agency (Local
Planning Agency) responsible for the preparation of the comprehensive plan or plan
amendment and shall make recommendations to the governing body regarding the
adoption or amendment of such plan, During the preparation of the plan or plan
amendment and prior to any recommendation to the governing body, the Local Planning
Agency shall hold at least one public hearing, with public notice, on the proposed plan or
plan amendment."
The pI:ovisions of Sec. 20-57 of the City Code which state in part ". .the planning and
zoning board shall serve as the local planning agency pursuant to the county
comprehensive planning act and the local government comprehensive planning act of the
state. , ."
It is City Administration policy that the applicant must provide the data, inventory and
analysis in support of the proposed comprehensive plan amendment and provide the '
response to the ORC Report.
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
CHC Development Company, Inc,
131 Park Lake Street
Orlando, FL 32803
[ same]
LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
March 7, 2001
Tuskawilla Road Site Plan Amendment
LS-CPA-5-00
Page I of3
REQUEST:
'.~ ..
PURPOSE:
For the Local Planning Agency to review and recommend adoption of the plan amendment
that would change the Future Land Use Map designation from (County) "Medium
Density Residential" to the "Town Center" designation on a 29,836 acre parcel.
NOTE: Since the transmittal of the plan amendment, the developer has reduced the land
under consideration for the large scale plan amendment. Originally the request involved
148 +/- acres.
The property owner of the 29 acres desires to develop the property in accordance with the
Town Center development regulations,
OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT (ORC) FROM
THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS:
The consultant for this proposed plan amendment is Boyer Singleton, Inc,. The consultant
received a copy of the ORC Report and has made the responses. [See Attachment 2 ]
FINDINGS:
.
Boyer Singleton,' Inc. has provided the response to the ORC Report relating to the
proposed plan amendment LS-CP A-5-0Q,
.
CRC Development, Inc. has reduced the area for consideration in the plan
amendment to approximately 29 acres instead of the original 148 acres. As a
result of this reduction of area for consideration, a substantial area of wetland is no
longer part of the plan amendment.
.
Wetlands do exist on the subject property although the exact location and extent of
these wetlands are not known at present because a jurisdictional wetland boundary
has not been established by the appropriate governmental agency,
.
Wetland delineation on the City's Future Land Use Map are understood to be
approximations and only at the time of site development review are they required
to be accurately delineated, [ref: Goal 2, Objective A, Policy 3)b. of the Land Use
Element and in Goall, Objective C, Policy 5)a, of the Conservation Element]
.
The Future Land Use Map should be modified to reflect the presence of wetlands
on the subject property, [ref: Goal 1, Objective B, Policy 1 of the Conservation
LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
March 7,2001
Tuskawilla Road Site Plan Amendment
LS-CPA-5-00
Page 2 of3
Element]
.
There is well established permit application process in the development of
property, whereby a detailed analysis is conducted by the St. Johns River Water
Management District (and sometimes other agencies) to determine the location,
extent, and type of on-site wetlands [ref: Goal }, Objective C, Policy 5)a. of the
Conservation Element]
.
The Florida Department of community Affairs recognizes the permit application
process of the Sf Johns River Water Management District for preservation of
wetlands.
.
The City's Comprehensive Plan provides for preservation of environmentally
sensitive areas through creation of an environmental easement either indicated on
the plat for the development or by a separate instrument approved by the City.
[ref.: Goal 2, Objective A, Policy 3)c, oftheLand Use Element]
.
The City has the authority at the time of development review to require a traffic
impact study that can specifically relate to what the development is proposed.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Local Planning Agency make the following recoinmendation to the
City Commission:
That the City Commission hold a second (adoption) public hearing and adopt the
large scale comprehensive plan amendment (LS-CP A-5-00) incorporating the City
staff and the Local Planning Agency's Findings, and the Response to the ORC
Report as the basis for the adoption of the plan amendment.
A TIACHMENTS:
}, ORC Report for Proposed Plan Amendment (LS-CP A-5-00),
2, Response to he ORC Report for LS-CP A-5-00.
3. LS-CPA-5-00 P.lan Amendment Original Data & Analysis Submission.
LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
March 7, 200]
Tuskawilla Road Site Plan Amendment
LS-CPA-5-00
Page 3 of3 '
ATTACHMENT 1
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
OBJECTIONS', RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS
FOR THE
,CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
, AMENDMENT 01-1
January 26,2001
Division of Community Planning
Bureau of Local Planning
This report is prepared pursuant to Rule 9J-l1.01O
/
c. Internal Consistency: Because the amendment has not demonstrated consistency with
statutory requirements for protection of natural resources, for coordination of land uses with
transportation facilities and services, for intergovernmental coordination and urban sprawl, the
amendment has not demonstrated internal consistency with the:
Traffic Circulation: Objective B, Policy 1 and 6, requiring coordination, Objective C,
and Policies I through 7 requiring level of service maintenance, Objective D, Policies 2
and 3;
Future Land Use Element: Goal 2, Objective A, Policies 1 through 3, requiring
protection of natural resources; Goal 3, Objective A and Policy 1 to prevent urban sprawl;
Conservation: Goal 1, Objective B, Policies I, 2, 4, and 5, protecting ,natural resources,
Objective c, Policies 6 and 7, regarding protection of floodplains and coordination;
Capital Improvements: goal 1, Objective C~ Policy 1, Transportation LOS
Intergovernmental Coordination: Goal 1, Objective A, Policy 6 regarding
coordination; Objective D, Policy 1 regarding coordination; Objective E, Policy 1,
regarding dispute resolution; Objective F Policy l.b and 3, regarding execution of
interlocal agreement for areas outside City's jurisdiction;
Recommendation: Do not adopt the amendments. Alternatively, make necessary revisions as
listed in parts LA.2.a and b above to justify the amendment.
Sections: 163.3177(1), 163.3177(6)(a), 163.3177(6)(c), 163.3177(6)(d),
163.3177(6)0),163.3177(8),163.3187(2), F.S.
Rules: 91-5.005(2), 9J-5.005(5), 9J-5.006(2)(b) and (c); 9J-5.006(3)(b)3, (b)6, (b)10 and (c)2;
91-5.006(4); 9J-5.006(5), 9J-5.013(2), F.A.C.
3. Amendment LS-CP A-S-OO (Tuscawilla): '
a. Suitability Based on Natural Resources and Facilities:
The City proposes a Land Use Map amendment revising 148 acres from Mixed use to Town
Center. Staff could not identify, based on the package, how current conservation areas totaling
+ 100 acres will be treated under the current land use amendment proposal. The current future
land use map shows the area as conservation and the text indicates that some areas will be
retained conservation. None of the proposed maps reflect the conservation intent. Policies in the
Town Center Category require jurisdictional wetlands be reflected as conservation.
Furthermore, it is unclear what the impacts to roadway facilities and services will be since the
analyses do not include an adequate assessment of available and projected capacity based on the
adopted level of services. FDOT commented the City lacked an adequate analysis.
Recommendation: Make applicable revisions as recommended in Part LA.I.a.
4
b. Internal Consistency: Because the amendment has not demonstrated consistency with
statutory requirements for protection of natural resources, and for coordination of land uses with
transportation facilities and services, amendment has not demonstrated internal consistency with
the City's goals, objectives and policies of the comprehensive plan as listed:
Traffic Circulation: Objective B, Policy 1 and 6, requiring coordination, Objective C,
and Policies 1 through 7 requiring level of service maintenance, Objective D, Policies 2
and 3;
Future Land Use Element: Goal 2, Objective A, Policies 1 through 3, requiring
protection of natural resources; and Goal 4 Objective B, Policies 1, 3, and 5, regarding
open space and wetland preservation in Town Center Areas;
Conservation: Goal 1, Objective B, P,olicies 1,2,4, and 5, protecting natural resources,
Objective c, Policies 6 and 7, regarding protection of floodplains and coordination;
Capital Improvements: goal 1, Objective C, Policy 1, Transportation LOS
Recommendation: Make applicable revisions as recommended in Part LA.l.b.
Sections: 163.3177(1), 163.3 I 77(6)(a), 163.3177(6)(c), 163.3177(6)(d),
163.3177(6)0),163.3177(8), 163.3187(2), F.S.
Rules: 9J-5.005(2), 9J-5.005(5),9J-5.006(2)(b) and (c); 9J-5.006(3)(b)3, (b)6, (b)10 and (c)2;
9J-5.006(4); 9J-5.006(5), 91-5.013(2), F.A.C.
B. Traffic Circulation Element
1. LS-CP A-6-00: The City has not met the requirements of the Transportation because certain
tables are not consistent with theFDOT work program and the revised element does not include
a current LOS for all roadways in the City.
'Recommendation: Revise Tables 14, 15, and Figures 7,8 for SR. 434, CR 419, SR 419, and Us
17-92 to be consistent with the FDOT work program. Reflect applicable roadway improvements
as scheduled in the FDOT work program as was recommended in the original 98-1 ORC.
Furthermore, the City has not revised the listing of facilities in the program to be consistent with
Seminole County. The City should revise the element to demonstrate coordination of facilities '
with the County by including a schedule of improvements. '
Other requirements should be met under chapter 163.3177(6)0), F.S., and 9J-5.019(4) and (5),
Florida Administrative Code. The Element should include the current Level of Service for
roadways in the City. Given that the data is from 1996 and 1997, the City should revisit the
issue to determine if this is still the best available data. The map series should include current
level of service for,roadways. The plan includes projected level of service but the table should
be reviewed to see if the information is still applicable.
Sections: 163.3l77(6)(b), 163.3177(6)G), 163,3177(8), F.S.
Rules: 9J-5.006(4), 9J-5.019(4), 9J-5.019(5), F.A.C.
5
II. STATE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSISTENCY
A. OBJECTION
1. The proposed amendments are not consistent with the following goals and policies of the
State Comprehensive Plan: ' '
a Goal (8) Water Resources, and Policies (b)2, (b)4, (b)8, and (b)10;
b. Goal (10) Natural Systems, and Recreational Lands and Policies (b)I, (b)3, (b)6,
and (b)7;
c. Goal (12), Energy, and Policy (b)3;
d. ,Goal (16), Land Use, and Policies (b)I, (b)2, (b)3, and (b)6;
e. 'Goal (18), Public Facilities, and,Policies (b)I, and (b)6; .
f. Goal (20), Transportation, and Policies (b)2, (b)3, (b)13, and (b)15; and
g. Goal (26), Plan Implementation and Policy (b)7.
B. RECON.ndENDATION
The City should revise the proposed amendment, as necessary, to be consistent with the
above-referenced goals and policies of the State Comprehensive Plan. Specific
recommendations can be found following the objections cited elsewhere in this ORC'report.
6
ATTACHMENT 2
Post-Jr Fax Nole 7671
To 1iJ. rl /11/11~
CoJDepl
Phone #
Dale
From
Co.
Fax,# -5J,?-f7S5
Fax #
ORC Report
Plan Amendment LS-CPA-5-00
Tuskawilla
City of Winter Springs, Florida
Prepared For
Carl Cahill, CHC Development Company, me,
February 2001
'f"'~ """','
Objections, Recommendations, And Comments Report
For the City of Winter Springs
3. Amendment L5-CPA-5-00 (Tuskawilla)
B. Suitability based on Natural Resources and Facilities:
The City proposes, a Land Use Map amendment revising 148 acres from Mixed use to
Town Center. Staff could not identify, based on the package, how current
conservation areas totaling +100 acres will be treated under the current land use
amendment proposal. The current future land use map shows the area as
conservation and the text Indicates that some area will be retained conservation.
, None of the proposed maps reflect the conservation intent. Policies In the Town
Center Category require jurisdictional wetlands be reflected as conservatlon. '
Furthermore, It Is unclear what the impacts to roadway facilities and services will be
since the analyses do not include an adequate assessment of available and projected
capacity based on the adopted level of services. FOOT commented the City lacked an
adequate analysis.
Recommendation: Make applicable revisions as recommended in Part l.A.l.a.
Part I.A-l.a. Recommendation: Revise the amendment to retain the wetland and
floodplain areas in a conservation land use designation or other designation to protect
the natural resources on-site.
Revise the amendment to Include an adequate transportation analysis. The analyses
should Include: 1) An assessment through the planning period of the impacts to
facilities based on the most Intense use Including cumulative Impacts (traffic)
generated by proposed amendments herein; 2) Data and analysis demonstrating
coordination of facilities with the proposed land uses; and 3) An assessment of the
timing of provision of services such that all services are provided at the adopted level
of service.
The analyses should assess the demand for services with regard to available capacity
of services. For example, the City should assess traffic generation with regard to
available capacity on existing roadways based on both the peak hour and the daily
average trips; and should take into account the traffic generated by proposed
amendments contained within this package.
All analyses should be based on the most Intense use proposed for development as
Identified and guided by the future land use map and future land use element policies,
and should assess impacts in the short-term within five years and through the
planning period (to 2015). AgaIn, using the transportation example, the analysis
should Identify current operating LOS for SR 434 and 417, as well as any applicable
local roadways. Include any FIHS facilities. The analysis should then factor In
anticipated Impacts from any proposed amendment such that a comparison of before-
amendment and after-amendment conditions can be made.
The analyses should then identify If and where deficiencies will be realized based on
TSW1\Reports\2000
Tuskawilla - Objections, Recommendations and Comments
Plan Amendment LS-CPA-5-00
February 2001, Page 1 of 4
l~ \I~i.,
the LOS maximums as established by the local comprehensive plan and FOOT. This
procedure shouJdbe repeated for a projected LOS through 2005 and 2015. For any
Identified deficiencies within five years, the City should identity how the deficiency will
be remedied through capital improvements planning Including the amount and source
of funding necessary, the type of project, and the expected timing of the project to
coincide with anticipated demands. If It Is for a facility that Is not wnhln the City's
funding Jurisdiction then the applicable work program (FOOT, andlor County) should
be used to Identity pertinent projects. Any projects needed should then be reflected
through a change to the comprehensive plan andlor corresponding capital
improvements schedule. For deficiencies identified beyond five years, the City should
Identify the types of planning strategies that will be used to alleviate facility
challenges Including any revisions to the plan that may be necessary. The strategies
should address the overall service network countYwide and take into account the
anticipated operational levels through the planning period.
The amendment will be revised to retain the wetland and floodplain areas in a conservation
or a similar land use designation to protect natural resources on site.
The amendment will be revised to include an adequate transportation analysis to include the
following:
. An assessment through the planning period (2015) of the impacts of facilities based
on the most intense use (3.5 dulac) and cumulative impacts (traffic) generated by
the proposed amendments;
. Data and analysis demonstrating the coordination of facilities with the proposed land
uses; and
. Assessment of the timing of provision of services such that all services are provided
at the adopted level of service,
The transportation analysis will determine traffic generated by the proposed amendments and
assess the demand for services with regard to available capacity including the following:
.
Analysis of both the existing peak hour and average daily trips;
Traffic generated by proposed amendments;
Assessment of impacts in the short-term (five years) and through the planning period
(2015);
Identification of current operating LOS for SA 434 and 417, applicable local roadways
and FIHS facilities;
Factor the anticipated impacts from the proposed amendment considering existing
and future conditions;
Identify deficiencies based on the existing LOS maximums;
Identify deficiencies based on projected LOS through 2005 and 2015;
For deficiencies identified within five years, the City will identify a remedy through
capital imprqvements planning;
The FOOT and/or County will be identified for pertinent projects outside the City's
funding jurisdiction;
Any necessary projects will be reflected through a change to the Comprehensive
Plan and/or corresponding capital improvements schedule;
Beyond the five-year timeframe, the City will identify planning strategies to alleviate
facility challenges; and
The City will identify strategies to address the overall service network countywide.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
TSW 1 \Reports\2000
Tuskawilla - Objections, Recommendations and Comments
Plan Amendment IS-CPA-5-00
February 2001, Page 2 of 4
\I.JI \I.J/ \I' I". ".J "/\,\ ""t'" l}""t.""UU'.
IH}" 1",1\ ").1''1\.1.1'.1 \II'
l~UlJ..
b. Internal Consistency:
Because the amendment has not demonstrated consistency with statutory
requirements for protection of natural resources, for coordination of land uses with
transportation facilities and services, amendment has not demonstrated Internal
consistency with t~e City's goals, objectives and policies of the comprehensive plan
as listed:
Trame Circulation: Objective B. Polley 1 and 6, requiring coordination, Objective C.
and Policies 1 and 7 requiring level of service maintenance, Objective 0, Policies 2
and 3;
Future Land Use Element: Goal 2, Objective A, Policies 1 through 3. requiring
protection of natural resources; Goal 4, ObJecUve B, Polley 1, 3, and 5, regarding open
space and wetland preservation in Town Center Areas;
Conservation: Goal 1, Objective B, Policies 1, 2. 4, and 5, protecting natural resources.
Objective c, Policies 6 and 7, regarding protection of floodplains and coordination;
Capital Improvements: Goal 1 , Objective C, Polley 1, Transportation LOS
Recommendation: Make applicable revisions as recommended In Part 1.A.1.b.
Part I.A.1.b. Recommendation: Retain the conservation area as recommended and
perform the necessary analyses for transportation as recommended. Revise the
amendment as necessary to be supported by the conservation and transportation
data.
Response: The am~ndment will be made as recommended in Part 1.A.1.b. The amendment
will retain the conservation area as recommended and the City will perform the necessary
transportation analxses.
TSW1\Reports\2000
Tuskawilla - Objections, Recommendations and Comments
Plan Amendment LS-CPA-5-00
February 2001, Page 30f4
ATTACHMENT 3
I
(
BoWYER
SlINGLETON
& AsSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
(
(
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Tuskawilla Road Site
City of Winter Springs, Florida
Prepared for
Carl Cahill, CRC Development Company, Inc.
August 2, 2000
520 50U1h Magllolia Avellul! . Orlalldo, Florida' 32801 . (407) 843-5120
(
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Tuskawilla Road Site
Table of Contents
Land Use Amendment Narrative
I. Site Description .......... ...... ..,'... .............. ......'......... ............ ............................................. ............ 1
J I. Surrounding Uses .... ..... ............ ....,....... ...... ..... ............. ..... ............................................... ......... 1
III. Amendment Request .... ... ..... ........ ..... .......... ,................ ................ ....... .......... ................ ............ 1
A. Property 1 .................,...................,............:........................ .................................... ...... 1
B. Property 2 .............. ....... .....' ... ............. ........... ......................................... ..... ........ ......... 1
C. Property 3 ....... ........................................... ................ ...................... ............. ....... ..... .... 2
IV, Statement of Compatibility.;.............. ......... ...... ...... ....... ................................. ....................... ..... 2
V . Town Center Background ....,. .......,."........ ....... ............ ........... .... ..... ............... .......... ,................. 3
(
VI.
Urban Sprawl ..... .............,..,............,.......................................................................................... 4
VII. Land Use Element ..........'.. ~........;.. ..... .................. ...... .................... .................... .... ......... ... .......6
A. Goal (2) ...... ...............,."............. ......... ..'... ....... .............. ....... ......... ...... ......... ..........,..,...6
B. Goal (3) .................................. ............... ........... ....... ...................................................,..7
C. Goal (4) ........ ..... ....................... ..... ......... ............ ..................... ................ ....... .....,.........7
VIII. Town Center Lane Use Element..,...............,........................................................,.................... 7
A. Vision ...... ..... ... ...;... ............. ..... .............. ..... .................... ................... .... ...... ..............7
B. Goal (5) ............... ....".....,......,'. ........ ............. ............ ............ ..;............ ...................... ...7
IX. Infrastructure,. .................,'....,......,........,.........., ........., ................. ..................,......,.,.......,.."....,.8
x Wetlands ....... ...... .... .........,.,.".,.......,.........', ..... '.,................ .... .....,.......... .... .....,. ...,........,.....,..,..9
XI. Soils....... ....... ................................".,...,........., ..... .....,..,...,.... .......,................... ........,...........,.....9
X II. Flood Prone. .........,. ,....".",'...'"..'".,.".",..,..,....,......,.,.,.... ,..,.,.......".",.............,.',.",.,'....,..",.,., 9
XIII. East Central Florida Regional Planning Council and Slate Comprehensive Land Use Plan.... 9
(
Exhibit A:
Exhibit B:
Exhibit C:
Exhibit D:
Exhibit E:
Exhibit F:
Exhibit G:
Exhibit H:
Exhibit I:
Exhibit J:
Exhibit K:
Exhibit L:
Exhibit M:
Exhibit N:
Exhibit 0:
TSW1\Reportsl5000
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Tuskawilla Road Site
Table of Contents
Continued
Exhibits
Application
Owner Authorization
Land Use Amendment Narrative
Site Location Map
Aerial Map
Property Boundary Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Map
Town Center District Boundary Map
Environmental Assessment Report
Wetland Map
Geotechnical Report
Soils Map and Legend
Property Surveys
Property Legal Descriptions
BoWYER
SJINGLEION
& AssocIATES, INCORPORATED
(
(,
Exhibit A
Application
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32708-2799
Telephone (407) 327-1800
APPLICATION FOR COl\1PREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDlVlENT
(TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP - 2010)
CAHILL
APPLICANT:
Last
ADDRESS: 131 PARK LAKE STREET
ORLANDO
City
~
PHONE: (407) 422-5456'
CARL
First
Middle
FLORIDA
State
32803
Zip Code
If applicant does nat own the property, provide the following:
OWNER:
(SEE ATTACHED OWNER AUTHORIZATION FORMS)
Last First
Middle
ADDRESS:
City
State
Zip Code
PHONE:
This is a request for change of Future 'Land Use designation fram
moder'3te density res~ & unassigned to Town Center on the property
described below.
Tax Parcel Number: 26-20-30-5AR UDOO-0360 AND 01-21-30-0000-0250
Size of Parcel:
+/- 148 Acres
sq. ft jacres.
Address of Property proposed for change of Future Land Use
Designation:
ADDRESS:
Tuskawilla Road
Winter Springs
Florida
state
32708
Zip Code
City
(
Present Zoning of the Parcel:
RT and Unassigned
Reason for request of change of Future Land Use Designation:
To develop a mixed use single-family development and mixed use tract that
compliment the Town Center District.
TO BE SUPPLIED AT TIME OF SUBMISSION OF APPLICATION:
* A copy of the most recent survey of the subj ect property.
* A copy of the legal description.
* Notarized authorization of the owner (if applicant is
other than owner or attorney for owner) .
* Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application Fee.
~g,~
C,Fc P'8~.//~
..
(
Applicant/OwnerSignature:
Date: August 2, 2000
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE
CITY COMMISSION AS WELL AS APPROVAL BY THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY AFFAIRS. THE AMENDMENT IS NOT EFFECTIVE UNTIL THE
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS ISSUES A "NOTICE OF INTENT" TO FIND
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE
REQUIREMENTS OF 163.3184 AND 163.3187, FLORIDA STATUES AND 9J-ll
FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE.
APPLICANTS ARE ADVISED, THAT IF THEY DECIDE TO APPEAL ANY DECISIONS
MADE AT THE MEETINGS OR HEARINGS, WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER
CONSIDERED AT THE MEETING OR HEARING, THEY WILL NEED A RECORD OF
THE PROCEEDINGS AND, FOR SUCH PURPOSES, THEY WILL NEED TO INSURE
THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, AT THEIR COST,
WHICH INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS
TO BE BASED, PER 286.0105, FLORIDA STATUTES.
('
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708.2799
Telephone (407) 327.1800
APPLICATION FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
(fO TIlE FUTURE LAND USE MAP - 2010)
CAHILL CARL
APPLICANT:
Last First
ADDRESS: 131 PARK LAKE STREET
ORLANDO FLORIDA
City State
~
PHONE: (407) 422-5456
Middle
32803
Zip Code
If applicant does not own the property, provide the following:
OWNER: (SEE ATTACHED OWNER AUTHORIZATION FORMS)
( Last First Middle
ADDRESS:
City State Zip Code
PHONE:
This is a request for change of Future 'Land Use'designation from
moderate density res. & unassigned to Town Center on the property
described below.
Ta,x Parcel Number: 26-20-30-5AR UDOO-0360 AND 01-21-30-0000-0250
Size of Parcel:
+/- 148 Acres
sq. ft jacres.
Address of Praperty proposed for change of Future Land Use
Designatian:
ADDRESS:
Tuskawilla Road
Winter Springs
Florida
State
32708
Zip Code
City
(
Present Zoning of the Parcel:
RT and Unassigned
Reason for request of change of Future Land Use Designation:
To develop a mixed use single-family development and mixed use tract that
compliment the Town Center District.
TO BE SuPPLIED AT TIME OF SUBMISSION OF APPLICATION:
* A copy af the most recent survey of the subj ect praperty.
* A copy of the legal description.
* Notarized authorization of the owner (if applicant is
other than owner or attorney for owner) .
* Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application Fee.
~~~
CFc .P8C1-.1"/~
..
(
ApplicantjOwnerSignature:
Date: August 2, 2000
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE
CITY COMMISSION AS WELL AS APPROVAL BY THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY AFFAIRS. THE AMENDMENT IS NOT EFFECTIVE UNTIL THE
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS ISSUES A "NOTICE OF INTENT" TO FIND
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE
REQUIREMENTS OF 163.3184 AND 163.3187, FLORIDA STATUES AND 9J-11
FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE.
APPLICANTS ARE ADVISED, THAT IF THEY DECIDE TO APPEAL ANY DECISIONS
MADE AT THE MEETINGS OR HEARINGS, WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER
CONSIDERED AT THE MEETING OR HEARING, THEY WILL NEED A RECORD OF
THE PROCEEDINGS AND, FOR SUCH PURPOSES, THEY WILL NEED TO INSURE
THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, AT THEIR COST,
WHICH INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS
TO BE BASED, PER 286.0105, FLORIDA STATUTES.
(
(
\
BoWYER
SlINGLETON
& AssOCI^TES, INCORPORATED
tNCINUAINC . PUHNINC . SUAV[f1NC . tNYIRON"'.""""
(
Exhibit B
Owner Authorization
CITY OF WINTER SPRlNGS
LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION
(
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
Township (Dl!L Range (R)l!L, Section (5) 26, Blod (B) 5 AR, Lot/Parcel Q..DOO 0360
Subdivi~ion Name and Number. D,R. Mitchell's SurveY of the Levy Grant
57 ATE OF: FLORJDA
COUNTY OF: _~EMlNOLE
(
I. Seminol~ Pines As30C., Ltd. the simple fee owner of the above doscribed property I
hereby authorize Carl H, Cahill of CHC Developmcnt Co.. me,. to serve as 2Iient on
my behalf and in stead for the purpose afmaking and O(ecutin~, ar the agcnt'3 discretion,
an application or applitations for development permit approval by the City of Wintcl
Sprinss, Florida on the aforementioned property including. but not limited to, application3
for annexation, special exception, conditional use permit, comprehensive plan amendment,
zoning amendment. subdivision of land, city code variance and waiver requestS, street and '
plar vacations, PUD approval, ,ite plan approval, and engineering amI building permit
approval. Any represenlation made on my behAlf by my Authorized agent shall be legally
bindin~ on me and my aforesaid property .u if J myselfMd made 3:lid represcntation3, a.nd
the City of Winter Springs hu the tighl to rely on uid representations in approyJOS or
disapproving any aforesaid appli~tion for development un my aforesaid property
Sworn to and ~ub:l\:libed before mc
this 2..2.. dAy of -.'Ja,UlQ ,..aL-
PCI~ODa1ly Known ( ); or
Type: of Identification Produced
-' --
~
llMonn' C. NE'HfON
Nolary pubUc - S1c1e of Aafdd
My commissIon ~ Ma 26. :2!XI1
commi~ion # CC720099
.
-
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
LETTER OF AUTHORlZATION
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
Township (T)-1.L, R2J1ge (R)~, Section (5) -2.L, Block (B) 0000. LotlParcel 0250
Subdivision Name and Number: Tuskawilla
Metes and Bound Legal: Attached
[(){lJ Attach and inirial if necessary,
STATE OF: FLORIDA
COUNTY OF: SEMINOLE
(
I, L. D. Plante. Inc. . the simple fee OWDer of the above described property, hereby
authorize Carl H. Cahill of eRC Development Co.. Inc., to serve as agent on my
behalf and in stead for the purpose of making and executing, at the: agent's discretion, an
application or applications for development permit approval by the City of Winter Springs,
Florida on the aforementioned property including, but not limited to, applications for
annexation, special excepri~ conditional use permit, comprehensive plan amendment,
zoning amendment, subdivision of land, city code: variance and waiver requests, street a..d
plat vacations, PUD approval, site plan approval, and engine"'..ring and building permit
approvG.!. A.ny representation made on my behalf by my authorized agent shall be le~al1y
binding on me and my a foresaid property as if J myself had made said re?resentauon5: and
the City of Wmter Springs has the right to rely on said representations in approving or
disapproving any aforesaid application for development on my ~esaid property.
, J. ,j). X.4NrF./~e,
OlhLPJJ
(Signature of Owner)
Sworn to and subsgib.ed before me
this d- \ :st day of ~~ to f\ e.. ' , l>OO 0
Q ~ ~t& /11 , 41J~ C//1
NOTARY ~JBL~C. ,Stale of Florida
My COmrnlsslOn .l::.XPlrcs:, , JJ"JJ'II'I;JJ"N~I:
~y '11 Shirl::v M. p&Ocr.lDl1 . .
Personally Known ( ../')' M~C" NOllll)'rublic.Sw=off1oOG.a ':
" .. ~anNa,CCM)972 "
Type: ofJde...'1!ific3tion Pro II.$' ~y Commu..u- Exp. 06/llI2OOl :,:
. ~hT-Y.I'\o.t'-ury~""~~.'~
. 1 . ......v....\.:\'\\'-)..."...,,\"~"""\,""\'f"\
. y...,y..,.,......""" " '
METES and BOUND LEGAL
Plante Property
(
,
THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 38, 39, 40, 41.42,43,44,45,46,47,48,57,60 AND 61 lYING
WEST OF TUSKAWllLA ROAD, 'TUSKAWJlLA,. D.R. M/TC.liElL'S SURVEY OF THe LEVY
GRANT, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 5, PUBUC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE
COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND PART OF VACATED RIGHI-OF-WAY, AS RECORDED IN
OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK iOSO, PAGE 401. SAID PUBliC RECORDS, SI-.ID P'''2CC:~ 1-,$
FURTHER DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 148, ?AGES 354-355 Af-lD O:=FICII\L
RECORDS BOOK 260, PAGES 310-31 i, SAID PUBLIC RECORDS, BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
(
COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHW::ST CORNER OF LOT 55, "TUSKJl..WILLA: D.R.
MITCHE!....L'S SURVEY OF THE LEVY GRANT, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 5,
PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA: THENCE RUt>-: S 870 02' 58" E,
AlONG THE SOUTH LOT LINE OF SAID LOT 55, A DISTANCE OF 219.45 FEET TO A POINT
,LYING ON A CURVE. CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A CEKTRAl ANGLE OF
030 33' 15", A RADIUS OF 5677.58 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF N 120 08' 25" E;
THENCE RUN NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE. A DISTANCE OF
352.20 FEET TO THE POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE OF A CURVE. CONCAVE
SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 010 27' 37", A RADIUS OF 5781.58
FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF N 110 05' 36" E; THENCE RUN NORTHEASTERLY
ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF 147.34 FEET FOR A porNT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE DEPARTING SAID CURVE, RUN N 000 08' ~3" E, A DISTANCE OF
51.09 FEET: THENCE RUN N 300 24' 55" W, A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET; THENCE RUN
N 45030' 24" W, A DISTANCE OF 146.05 FEET; THENCE RUN S 770 09' 15" W, A DISTANCE
OF 36.88 FEET; THENCE RUN S 210 0.' 00" W, A DISTANCE 60.84 FEET; THENCE RUN
S 13037' 33" W, A DISTANCE OF 72.97 FEET; THENCE RUN N 520 2S' 55" W, A DISTANCE
OF 52...37 FEET; THENCE RUN $ 550 28' 46" W, A DISTANCE OF 52.52 FEET; THENCE RUN
S 60C 28' 25" W, A DISTANCE OF 40.33 FEET; THENCE RUN S 790 38' 15" W, A DISTANCE
OF 80.50 FEET: THENCE RUN S 150 02' 58" E, A DISTANCE OF 70.3-4 fEET; TI-:ENCE RlJN
N 820 3-4' 46" W, A DISTANCE OF 106.99 FEET: THENCE RUN N 82047' OS" W. A DISTANCE
OF 95.32 FEET: THENCE RUN S 710' 44' 19" W, A DISTANCE OF 62.82 FEET; THENCE RUN
N 82" 23' 13" W, A DISTANCE OF 166.51 FEET; THENCE RUN N 870 14' 19" W, ;.. lJISI..c..nCE
OF 194.43 FEET;"THENCE RUN N 27; 29' 37" E, A DISTANCE OF 69.65 FEET; THEr-lCE
RUN N 210 50' 46" W. A DISTANCE OF 60.65 FEET; THENCE RUN N 760 22' 07" W, A
DISTANCE OF :61.47 FEET; THENCE RUN S 630 17' 04" W, A DISTANCE Of 40.69 FEET;
THENCE RUN N 02057' 55" E, A DISTANCE OF 185.18 FEET; THENCE RUN S 87002' 04" E.
A DISTANCE OF 966.05 FEET; S 45030' 23" E, A DISTANCE OF 213.45 FEET TO A POINT
ON A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A Cc=NTRAL ANGLE OF 010 01' 13",
A RADIUS OF 5781.58 FEEl AND A CHORD BEARING OF S 12020' 01" W; THENCE RUN
SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE. A DISTANCE OF 102,95 FEET TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING,
CONTAINING 5.644 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
AND ALSO
rQ
&/1;
Own~r':; Initials
(
(
EXHIBIT "A"
DESCRIPTIONS:
METES AND BOUND DESCRIPTION: {WRITTEN BY SURVEYOR}
BEGIN AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 63, "TUSKAWIU...A: D.R. MITCHELL'S SURVEY O~
THE LEVY GRANT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK i, PAGE
5 OF .HE PUBLIC RECORDS Of SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA AND RUN S 870 02' 05" E ALONG
THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE CERTAIN 30 FOOT RIGHT-OF",WAY ALONG THE
SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID "TUSKAWILLA," 1'145.76 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT-
OF-WAY LINE OF TUSKAWlLLA ROAD AS SHOWN ON SEMINOLE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS
'DEPARTMENT RIGHT-OF-WAY MAP OF TUS/(AWILLA ROAD PHASE IV, SAID POINT LYING ON A
CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 5677,56 FEET, A CHORD OF 29'.'~
FEET, AND A CHORD BEARING OF N 11Q 49' 43" E; THENCE RUN NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID
CURVE, AND RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, 291.18 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 2055' 15" TO
THE POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE: OF A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY. HAVING A
RADIUS OF 5781,58 FEET, A CHORD OF 147.77 FEET. AND A CHORD BEARING OF /oJ 11" 05' 33" E;
THENCE RUN NORTHEAST~RLY ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND CURVE, 147.77 FEET:
'THENCE DEPARTING SAID CURVE AND RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE RUN N 000 08' 13" E, 51,09 FEET:
THENCE RUN N 30" 24' 55~ W, 50.00 FEET; THENCE RUN N 45" 30' 24" W, 146,05 FEE.T; THENC::
RUN ,S 77" 09' 15" W, 36,88 FEET: THENCE RUN S 21c 01' AD" W, 60.84 FEET; THENCE RUN
S 13" 37' .33" W, 72,57 FEET; THENCE RUN N 52" 28' 55" W, 52.37 FEET; THENCE RUN S 55028' 46"
W, 62.62 FEET; THENCE RUN S 60028' 25" W. 40.33 FEET: THENCE RUN S 79" 38' 15" W, 80,50
FEET; THENCE RUN S 15" 02' 58" E, 70.3~ FEET: THENCE RUN N S2c 34' 46" W, 105.95 FEET:
THENCE RUN N e2047' 09" W, 95..32 FEET: THENCE RUN S 71" 44' 19" W. 62,82 FEET: THENCE
RUN N 82023' ,3" W, 166.51 FEET: THENCE RUN N B7e 14' 19" W, 194.43 FEET; T~ENCE RUN
N 27029' 3r E. 59,65 FEET; THENCE RUN N 210 50' 46" W, 60.65 FEET: THENCE RUN N 76022' or
W, 61.47 FEET; THENCE RUN S 63" 17' 04" W, 40.69 FEET: THENCE RUN N 020 57' 5=" E, j 85.1 e
FEET; THENCE RUN S 87" 02' Ot." E. 966.05 FEET: THENCE RUN S 450 30' 23" E, 2i3.45 F=EET TO ,c...
POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF TUSKAWILLA ROAD AS SHOWN ON SAD
SEMINOLE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RIGHT-OF-WAY MAP OF TUS/(AW/LLA ~OAu,
PHASE IV, SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS C;:
5781.58 FEET, A CHORD OF 131.69 FEET, AND A CHORD BEARING OF N 13029' 4S" E; THENCE
RUN NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, 131.65 FEET THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10 18' 1S" TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE RUN N 14" os' 55" E
ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, 239.54 FEET TO ;:.. POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY
LINE OF LOT 37 OF SAJD "TUSKAVVlLlA:' THENCE DEPARTING SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE RUN S 87' 02' OS" E ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINES OF SAID LOT 37 AND LOT 40 OF SAID
-TUSKAWJLLA~ AND WESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF, 328.16 FEET TO A POINT ON THE
CENTER LINE OF THAT CERTAIN RIGKT-OF-WAY LYING BETWEEN LOTS 24 AN:; 25 ON THE
NORTH, AND LOTS 58 AND 55 ON THE SOUTH OF SAID -TUSKAWILLA" VACATED IN OFi=/CIAL
RECORDS BOOK 10:0, PAGE 401 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA:
THENCE RUN N 03" 38' 32" E ALONG SAID CENTER LINE. 480,02 FEET TO A POINT ON THE
EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 25; THENCE DEPARTING SAID
CENTER LINE, RUN N e70 OZ' 07" E ALONG THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY L1t~E OF THAT
CERTAIN RIGHT-OF-WAY LYING 9ETWEEN LOTS 2 AND 17 ON THE EAST AND LOTS 15 AND 32
ON THE WEST OF SAID lUSKAWILlA," 930,34 FcET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID lOT
32; THEN~E RUN S 03037' 41" IN ALONG THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THAT CER7AIN
30 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID "TUSKAWlLLA:
1380.05 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING: CONTAINING 12::;2227,16 SQUARE FcCl (29.6655
ACRES).
00
( y
Owner's Initials
(
BoWYER
SlINGLETON
& AssocIATES, INCORPORATED
INCIH([I11NC . PLANNINC . SURVEYINC . [NVIRONM(N1Al
(
Exhibit C
Land Use Amendment Narrative
/
Land Use Amendment Narrative
,
\
I. Site Description
The subject site is approximately 148 acres located on the west side of Tuskawilla Road, south of
State Road 434, and contiguous to the current Town Center District. The specific property
boundaries are detailed on Exhibit D, Site location Map.
II. Surrounding Uses (Please refer to Exhibit E, Aerial Map)
North: Conservation, Tuskawilla Trails Mobile Home Park, U.S. Post Office
East: Tuskawilla Trails Mobile, Meat Packing Plant, Public School
South: Single-Family Residential
West: Conservation
III.
Amendment Request
(
This land Use Amendment consists of a request to amend the land Use of various sites to Town
Center, or assign Town Center land Use to recently annexed properties. Because the overall
request involves properties, of varying status of assigned land Use, this application will refer to
the sites as Property 1, Property 2, and Property 3 (please refer to Exhibit F, Property Boundary
Map). The specifics of each property are as follows:
A. Property 1
Property 1 contains approximately 108.49 acres. The land Use designation for the site
is Moderate Density Residential with a Conservation overlay encumbering j: 99 acres of
the property. The site is currently zoned R"T Mobile Home Park District.
Our request is to amend the current land use to Town Center. This change would
accommodate our application for concurrent rezoning that we have filed with the City for
the Town Center District Zoning. The anticipated development program includes
approximately 12 acres of residential with the remaining :!: 96 acres of the property to
remain as Conservation,
B.
Property 2
(
Property 2 contains approximately 38,78 acres, The land Use designation and zoning
for the site are currently unassigned due to the site being recently annexed into the
City of Winter Springs, When the site was in unincorporated Seminole County, the land
TSW1\Reportsl5000
BOWYER-SINGLETON
(
Use designation was Medium Density Residential (up to 10 dwelling units per acre) with
an A-1 zoning classification.
Our request is to assign the Town Center Land Use to the site. This assignment would
accommodate our application for concurrent rezoning that we have filed with the City for
the Town Center District Zoning. The anticipated development program includes
approximately 17.34 acres of residential, 4.7 acres of mixed-use, 5.64 acres of
stormwater and 11.1 acres of Conservation.
C. Property 3
Property 3 contains approximately .8 acre. The site is currently under consideration for
annexation into the City of Winter Springs. The Seminole County Land Use Designation
for the site is currently Medium Density Residential (10 dwelling units per acre) with an
A-1 zoning classification.
Our request is to assign the Town Center Land Use to the site. This assignment would
accommodate our application for concurrent rezoning that we have filed with the City for
the Town Center District Zoning. The anticipated development program includes
approximately .8 acre that will be incorporated into the 4.7 acre mixed-use tract described
under Property 2.
(
Please refer to Exhibit G, Land Use Map, and Exhibit H, Zoning Map, for depictions of the
sites.
IV.
Statement of Compatibility
The subject request to amend the future land use of Properties 1, 2, and 3 to Town Center would
be compatible with surrounding development. These are infill properties that are one of perhaps
two sites that could be incorporated into the Town Center while meeting current Comprehensive
Plan Goals, Objectives, and Policies for the district.
The following findings are made with respect to the site's compatibility with the surrounding
development:
A. Property 1 currently is assigned Moderate Density Land Use that allows up to
6,5 dwelling units per acre. The current zoning is R- T Mobile Home Park District.
The development program for this portion of the site will consist of approximately
20 single-family dwelling units at a density comparable to the density entitlement
currently assigned. Single-family development is less intense than the currently
allowable mobile home units. Also, single family residential is compatible with the uses
allowed in the Town Center district in that it integrates one of the desired uses into the
center.
TSW11Reports\5000
2
BOWYER-SINGLETON
B.
Properties 2 and 3 have been recently annexed or in the process of being annexed, into
the City, and therefore, land use is not assigned to the sites. However, the County land
use designation for the properties of Medium Density Residential would allow 10 dwelling
units per acre. The permitted zonings in this land use provide accommodations for
multiple family and residential professional development.
c.
The proposed uses for the site are single family-residential and a mixed-use tract that
would allow uses that compliment the existing Town Center district. The density for the
single-family tract is currently proposed to be half of that permitted under the County's
land use designation. The mixed-use site is currently proposed for development that is
comparable to that allowed by the County's designation. To enhance compatibility with
the property to the south, a wall will be installed between it and Property 3.
East of the site is an existing meat packing plant in an industrial zoning and a public
school. The future land use for the majority of this area is industrial.
As indicated by the above findings, the proposed land use would be compatible with the
surrounding area.
v.
Town Center Background
(
On June 12, 2000, the City of Winter Springs adopted the Town Center Future Land Use Map
designation and assigned the same to approximately 240 acres of property. The creation of the
new Land Use resulted from several considerations, including, but not limited to:
· The State Road 434 Corridor Vision Plan outlined a "Town Center" located around the
intersection of State Road 434 and Tuskawilla Road.
· Policy 3(c), the Traffic Circulation Element of the Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan,
refers to the "creation in the undeveloped central area of Winter Springs of a primary
civic, business and service focus for the City.
· The City Commission declared that, based on numerous public meetings, that the Town
Center will be developed in the "neo-traditional" or "new urbanism" approach involving
mixed uses with increased densities and intensities.
According to the City's Comprehensive Plan, the "primary and fundamental purpose of the Town
Center shall be a place where people can reside in a mix of single and multiple family dwellings,
and also gather to shop, relax', recreate, be entertained, attend community events, and enjoy the
natural beauty of lands located in the Town Center."
Please refer to Exhibit I, Town Center District Boundary Map, for a graphic depiction of the Town
Center District.
TSW11ReportslSOOO
3
BOWYER-SINGLETON
(
(
(
"
VI. Urban Sprawl
9J-5.006 (5), Future Land Use Element, of the Florida Administrative Code pertains to the review
of plans and plan amendments for discouraging urban sprawl.
The following is a list of urban sprawl indicators with respective responses as to why this
proposed Plan Amendment does not promote urban sprawl.
A. Promotes, allows or designates for development substantial areas of the jurisdiction to
develop as low intensity, or single-use development or uses in excess of demonstrated
need.
Response: The subject site is an intill property surrounded by lands that are developed.
The development program consists of a mix of uses including residential of moderate
intensity and a non-residential tract. These uses will support those proposed uses in the
Town Center district and will not be in excess of demonstrated need.
B.
Promotes, allows or designates significant amounts of urban development to occur in
rural areas at substantial distances from existing urban areas while leaping over
undeveloped lands which are available and suitable for development.
Response: The s,ubject site is contiguous to the Town Center and is surrounded by
urban development.
c.
Promotes, allows, or designates urban development in radial, strip, isolated or ribbon
patterns generally ~manating from existing rural developments.
Response: This site is an infill property that surrounded is by urban development. The
amendment would not create urban development on radial, strip, isolated or ribbon
pattern.
D. As a result of premature or poorly planned conversion of rural land to other uses, fails to
adequately to protect and conserve natural resources, such as wetlands, floodplains,
native vegetation, environmentally sensitive areas, natural groundwater aquifer recharge
areas, lakes, rivers, shorelines, beaches, bays, estuarine systems, and other significant
natural systems.
Response: This proposeddeveJopment program for the site will not impact any flood
prone areas and will protect approximately 98,53 acres (74% of the site) of wetlands as
conservation.
TSW11Reports\5000
BOWYER-SINGLETON
4
(
E.
Fails to adequately protect use of existing public facilities and services.
Response: As this subject site is surrounded by urban uses, public facilities and
services are readily available. Adequate capacity is available for all services provided to
the site.
F. Fails to maximize use of future public facilities and services.
Response: The development program offers a mix of uses at an intensity and location
that maximizes the use of future public facilities and services.
G. Allows for land use patterns or timing which disproportionately increase the cost in time,
money and energy, of providing and maintainin'g facilities and services, including roads,
potable water, sanitary sewer, storm water management, law enforcement, education,
health care, fire and emergency response, and general government.
Response: The proposed development program will not adversely impact available
capacity for roads, water, sewer service, and storm water management systems.
Furthermore, the development site is located at the center of town within minutes from
law enforcement, education facilitates, health care, fire and emergency response, and
general government.
(
H.
Fails to provide clear separation between rural and urban land uses.
Response: Separation between rural and urban land uses are not an issue for the site in
that the site an infill property surrounded by urban development.
I. Discourages or inhibits infill development or redevelopment of existing neighborhoods
and communities.
Response: The subject property is infill development.
J. Fails to encourage an attractive and functional mix of uses.
Response: The request for the site combines a mixture of residential and
non-residential uses, Furthermore, the Town Center district contains architectural
standards and siting requirements that facilitate attractive development.
K.
Results in poor accessibility among linked or related land uses.
(
Response: The Town Center district encourages pedestrian movements between
varying uses, In addition, the site will be located within a 5 minute walking distance from
the heart of the Town Center,
TSWlIReportslSOOO
5
BOWYER-SINGLETON
(
\
L.
Results in loss of significant amounts of functional open space,
Response: In addition to the:!: 98,53 acres of wetland areas preserved for conservation
that may be utilized as passive recreation, there will also be an active park area
containing various uses that may include, but not be limited to, a ball field, tot lot,
swimming pool, etc,
VII. land Use Element
A. Goal (2)
To preserve the natural drainage features within Winter Springs as assets
complementing the residential and commercial areas.
Comment: The preliminary drainage design takes full benefit of the site's topography by
creating storm water treatment and storage at the lowest contours of the upland areas of
the site. In a significant rain event, the stormwater will outfall into the:!: 98.53 acres of
conservation.
1.
Objective (A)(2): Perpetuation of the existence and benefit of natural drainage
features, excluding them from uses that require the support of urban
infrastructure.
(,
Comment: The developable portions of the site are not natural drainage
features; however, the conservation area does serve as a basin into which many
surrounding properties outfall. The conservation area, as a natural drainage
feature, will not require any urban infrastructure related to this development.
2. Objective (8): "The City shall ensure the protection of natural drainage features
and other natural resources such as native vegetative communities, historic
resources and wildlife habitat by providing for clustering of development on
property proposed to be improved in exchange for preservation of natural
resources, and permitting equivalent increased construction on the remaining
land owned by the same entity.
Comment: The development program proposes the preservation of
:!:98.53 acres (74% of the site) to remain in perpetual conservation. Development
will be clustered onto the upland areas of the property.
· Policy (1 )(c): Residential uses may be transferred to the upland portion
of a parcel designated as residential at a rate of 100% of the permitted
density on the conservation district area, up to a maximum density of
ten (10) dwelling units per acre on the upland portion of the property,
TSWl IReports 15000
6
BOWYER-SINGLETON
(
Comment: Transferring density from the conservation district area is not
proposed at this time. However, if transfer did take place, it would not
exceed the maximum density of ten (10) dwelling units per acre.
B.
Goal (3)
1. Objective (C): Allocation of acreage and diversity of land uses sufficient for civic,
commercial, and industrial activity, either separately, or within a mixed use
classification.
Comment: The development proposes a mixture of residential units,
non-residential use that compliment the Town Center district, and passive and
active recreation. The addition of the uses further the City's objective to allocate
diversity of land uses.
C. Goal (4)
1.
Objective A, Policy (5): Recreation facilities shall be installed in a neighborhood
park serving the area in which a new subdivision is located..."
(
Comment: With the construction of the residential component of the subject
development, active and passive recreation areas will be provided.
VIII. Town Center Lane Use Element
A. Vision
"....The City Commission of the City of Winter Springs desires to implement the
requirement of Policy 3c of Objective A under Goal 1 of the Traffic Circulation Element
which indicates that there be "creation in the undeveloped central area of Winter Springs
of a primary civic, business and service focus for the City....lt is the declaration of the
City Commission, based on numerous public meetings, that the Town Center will be
developed in the "neo-traditional" or "new urbanism" approach involving mixed uses with
increased densities and intensities."
Comment: The location of this proposed Land Use Amendment is contiguous to the
current Town Center district, and is therefore, sited in the central area of Winter Springs,
The development program for the site will provide uses that compliment the remainder of
the Town Center as it develops. The design of the site will be in keeping with
"neo-traditional" or U new urbanism" standards.
B.
Goal (5)
(
The primary and fundamental purpose of the Town Center shall be a place where people
can reside in a mix of single and multiple family dwellings, and also gather to shop, relax,
TSW l1Reportsl5000
7
BOWYER-SlNGLETON
(
recreate, be entertained, attend community events, and enjoy the natural beauty of lands
located in the Town Center."
Comment: The residential and non-residential components of the development will be
designed so as to encourage pedestrian interaction. This will be accomplished through
pedestrian walkways, passive recreation areas, and active recreation areas.
Furthermore, the heart of the Town Center will be located within a 5 minute waking
distance from the subject site,
1. Objective A: "The Town Center should be located in close proximity to existing
public facilities such as City Hall, Winter Springs High School, Central Winds
Community Park, and'U.S. Post Office. The: town' Center should be a compact
area primarily located on the north side of Route 434 and along both sides of
Tuskawilla Road, as depicted on the City's Future Land Use Map." ,
Comment: The subject site is contiguous to the existing Town Center district
making the site in close proximity to the aforementioned public facilities.
The addition- of the subject site would keep the entire Town Center district
compact. The site is located along the west of Tuskawilla Road.
a.
Policy 1: From time to time, the City Commission may revise the Future
Land Use Map to designate land "Town Center" consistent with this
Objective."
(
Comment: This policy provides the City Commission with clear authority
to addadditionallands to the existing Town Center.
b. Policy 4: Through the enactment of creative and flexible land
development regulations, permit a variety of mixed-uses consistent,
compatible, and in harmony with the Town Center Goal, including Single
family residential, multiple family residential, commercial retail and
services, public services and buildings, parks, and schools."
Comment: This policy is furthered in that the development program of
the subject site offers a variety of uses that are consistent, compatible,
and in harmony with the existing Town Center district.
IX. Infrastructure
Roads: The site is situated in an area with a road network that more than meets the needs to
develop the subject site as proposed. The site fronts on Tuskawilla Road. Tuskawilla Road is
currently being four-Ianed by Seminole County, The road will have adequate capacity to
accommodate the subject site at an acceptable Level of Service.
TSW 1 \ReporTsl5000
8
BOWYER-SINGLETON
Sanitary: Sanitary service will be obtained from Winter Springs through a connection located to
the south. There is adequate capacity to accommodate development of the subject site at an
acceptable Level of Service.
Water: Waler service will be obtained from Seminole County via a 12" water main. There is
adequate capacity to accommodate the site at an acceptable level of service.
X. Wetlands
An environmental assessment report was performed by Morgan Environmental Consulting (copy
attached as Exhibit J). During the assessment period, a' wetland line was delineated and
surveyed in accordance with the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) and
United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) standards; a jurisdictional determination is
currently being sought for this line. '
All development will comply with the permitting standards of any agency having jurisdiction over
such matters.
Please refer to Exhibit K, Wetland Map for a graphic depiction of the site in relation to wetlands.
XI.
Soils
(
Universal Engineering Sciences has performed a preliminary geotechnical exploration of the site.
According to their report, the existing on-site soils are suitable for development. Also, no muck
was found in the areas to be developed, nor was there any confining soil layer that would inhibit
percolation.
Please refer to Exhibit L for a copy of the Geotechnical Report. Also, refer to Exhibit M,
Soils Map, for a graphic depiction of the on-site soils.
XII. Flood Prone
According to Flood Insurance Rate Maps, the areas of the site proposed for development do not
contain any flood prone land.
XIII. East Central Florida Regional Planning Council and Slate Comprehensive Land Use Plan
This Land Use Amendment Application furthers the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the East
Central Florida Comprehensive Regional Policy Plan and the State's Comprehensive Plan.
TSW11Reportsl5000
9
BOWYER-SINGLETON
(
~JBrWYER
0lU.~GLEION
& AssocIATES, INCORPORATED
[NCINUAINC . PLANN1NC . SURVEYlNC . [NVJIl.CN"ENU~
c
c
Exhibit D
Site Location Map
(
!.. "-
j';;',',:';',::"
~,\;!.:;,::/:::::::.,:
c
,
"
.~.
I
\..
.....
?
.,
('
~#':~
Notth
Location
Map
~BpWYER
0Jll1 'lGLKfON
&. AssOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Tuskawilla
Road Site
Prepared For:
CHC Developmf)nt Co., Inc.
fHGIH((fUHC . 'LANN'NC . SU"VfYIHQ . [NVUlONM(NfAI
520 SOUTH MAGNOUA AVENUE
ORlANDO, FLORIDA 32801
(407) 843-5120
FAX 407-649-8664
Comprehensive Policy
Plan Amendment
7-20-00 TSW7
(
lBoWYER
SlNGlE1DN
& AssocIATES. INCORPORATED
INClld(AINC . PlANNINC . SURVEYING. (NYlRON"!N'''!.
('
( .
, ,
Exhibit E
Aerial Map
(
,
(
.,
'i,'~
~'
~.' I
North
Aerial
Photo
~BpWYER
0Jll'JGLElDN
& AssOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Tuskawilla
Road Site
Prepared For:
CHC Development Co" Inc,
[NGIN((JIIINC .. "lANNING .. SUIW[VINC .. [NVU\OHMUH"'l
Comprehensive Policy
Plan Amendment
520 SOUTH MAGNOLIA AVENUE
ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32801
(407) 843-5120
FAX 407-649-8664
7-20-00 TSW7
(
IBoWYER
SllNGLETON
& AssocIATES, INCORPORATED
INGlHEUIINe . "LANNING. SUAVE'ING . ENVlRONM!NtAI.
(
(
. Exhibit F
Property Boundary Map
i
I
,
----\
-- \
------r-------- "
~ ~ \
\ \. \
,
\ \ \
\
\ ,
\ \ \.
\ ,
\ \ \'.
\ '---~-- \.
\ \ \
\ :-------1 _ ~
I ,
I I
\ PROPERlY ONE
I
I
\
I
I
\
I
I
\
I
I
\
\
(
I
I
r------~--I
j :
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.PROPERIY TWO
I
L__ . L
-----------1 ' ====:---------
PROPERlY - ~-;; y---
Property
Boundary Map
BoWYER
SF\TGLETON
& AssOCIATES, INCORPORATED
[NCJN((ftIHC . "LANNINC . SUftV(YIHC . (HVIA.OHM(HfAl
Prepared For:
CHC Development Co., Inc.
520 SOUTH MAGNOLIA AVENUE
ORLANDO. FLORIDA 32801
(407) 843-5120
FAX 407-649-8664
~
North
Tuskawilla
Road Site
Comprehensive Policy
Plan Amendment
7-20-00
TSWl
)
}
~~
Norfh
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
FUTURE LAND. USE MAP cI 2010
)
Jf:SJ'P
~
-......,......
_....._ ,."00
)
...---....,
..._....., .,op 11"\
... "0:._ .....-
=
;;""'-'JU-o,.
,~
o.
."1_..........-
I
\.
~~WYER
0ll1~GLlEION
& AssocIATES, INCORPORATED
(
(
Exhibit H
Zoning Map
~
Notth
Zoning
Map
BoWYER
SiNGLETON
IX AssOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Tuskawilla
Road Site
lNCIHHf\IHC . '"ANNINC .. SUftV(VINC .. (NYIA,ONI.4(NIA.
520 SOUTH MAGNOLIA AVENUE
ORLANDO. FLORIDA 32801
(407) 843-5120
FAX 407-649-8664
Comprehensive Policy
Plan Amendment
Prepared For:
CHC Development Co., Inc.
7-20-00 TSWI
BoWYER
SlINGLElDN
& AssOCIATES, INCORPORATED
(
Exhibit I
Town Center, District Boundary Map
/
\
f
TOWN CE~TER
A. TowlI CClltCI' Distl"ict BOllndary Map
l!:!!lI!!!!!:!I District Boundary
- - County Enclaves (not in city)
- - .
--=:-.::~--
~
Q,{-
<?
./
<? J'
i'/
.-0
"
(
". -:,
OUT ;;
r;---,;,
"";.J -,-
\
,-
'\
\.1-
I
cJ
~
North
Town Center
District Boundary
BoWYER
SJNGLETON
& AssoCIATES, INCORPORATED
Tuskawilla
Road Site
(
Prepared For:
CHC Development Co., Inc.
(NCIN([,.INC . "LANNINC . SURVEYINC . (NVU\ONM(Nr...,
520 SOUTH MAGNOLIA AVENUE
ORLANDO. FLORIDA 32801
(407) 843-5120
FAX 407-649-8664
Comprehensive Policy
Plan Amendment
7-20-00 TSWI
(
,BoWYER
SlINGLElDN
& AssOCIATES, INCORPORATED
lNCINUAINC . PLANNINC . SURV(YINC . IHVIRONM(NTAL
\.
Exhibit J
Environmental Assessment Report
Morgan Environmental Consulting
740 Florida Central Parkway, Suite 2004
Longwood, Florida 32750
(
June 1, 2000
D ~~~ll~~~
Mrs. Sandy Bierly
CHC Development
1 31 Park lake Street
Orlando, Florida 32803
Re: Environmental Status Report
Tuskawilla Trails/Plante Property
Dear Mrs. Bierly:
Per your request, a thorough environmental analysis of the subject property
has been performed, including information relating to listed species of
wildlife and plants, as well as a review of wetland issues. All field, work has
been completed in conformance with applicable regulations and guidelines set
forth by the State of Florida and federal environmental regulatory agencies
as well as state and federal wildlife departments.
( SITE EVALUATION
The Tuskawilla Trails/Plante Property is an approximately 200 acre tract
that is located within Seminole County. This parent tract is composed of two
adjacent parcels that are separated by a number of out parcels. The
largest, approximately 1 60 acres, and most northern of these parcels is
referred to as Tuskawilla Trails and consists of a mobile home park. The
Tuskawilla Trails property fronts on the western side of State Road, 434,
roughly one-half mile north of Tuskawilla Road. The second of these parcels
is approximately 39 acres in size and is located to the south and east of
Tuskawilla Trails. This parcel is, referred to as the Plante Property and
fronts on the western side of Tuskawilla Road, approximately one-quarter
mile south of State Road 434. The Tuskawilla Trails property is located
within Section 36, Township 20 South, Range 30 East. The Plante property is
located within Section 1, Township 21 South, Range 30 East.
(
*It should be noted that approximately 45 acres of the Tuskawilla Trails
property has previously been developed as a mobile home community.
Therefore, only the remaining i: 110 acres will be discussed within this
report.
Phone (407) 260-0448 . Fax (407) 260-0446
(
Mrs. Sandy Bierly
Environmental Status Report
June 1, 2000
Page 2
With regard to upland tracts located within the parent parcel, there are
three (3) distinct vegetative communities. The first of these upland
communities is located. within the Tuskawilla Trails property, within its'
southeast corner. These uplands can be characterized as a long leaf pine _
xeric oak community (FLUCCS* - 412) that' is dominated by a canopy of
longleaf pine, live oak, and laurel oak; a sub-canopy of scrub oak and wax
myrtle; and a dense understory of saw palmetto, deermoss, and fetterbush~
The second upland community is located within the Plante property and
consists of the majority of land located north of the retention pond,'
currently being constructed by Seminole County. This community can be
characterized as a pine - mesic oak community (FLUCCS* - 414) that is
dominated by a canopy of slash pine, laurel oak, red maple, and scattered live
oak; a sub-canopy of like-species and cabbage palm; and an understory of
primarily bahia, andropogon, blackberry, and muscadine vine. The final upland
community within the parent tract is located within the southern portion of
( the Plante property, south of the above mentioned retention pond. This area
can best be characterized as a pine-flatwood community (FLUCCS*- 411 ) the
is dominated by a canopy of slash pine and scattered longleaf pine and
sweetgum; a sub-canopy of like-species and wax myrtle; and an understory
of dense saw palmetto, fetterbush, braken fern, greenbriar, and muscadine.
With regard to wetlands, one (1) system exists on-site that would be claimed
as jurisdictional by local, state, and federal agencies. This wetland, although
contiguous, can be characterized as three (3) separate vegetative
communities. The largest of these wetland communities is located along the
western boundary of the Plante property and within the western and
southern portions of the Tuskawilla Trails property. This vegetative
community can best be described as a pond pine wetland (FLUCCS* - 622)
that is dominated by a canopy of pond pine, loblolly bay, sweetgum, and red
bay; a sub-canopy of like species, dahoon holly, and wax myrtle; and an
, understory of palmetto, cinnamon fern, chain fern, and galberry. Due to the
drop in elevation along the western boundary, this system acts as a "seepage
slope" wetland, a wetland typically found on a sloped property, where there is
a confining layer close to the surface that "releases" water along the higher
elevations of :the slope rather that at the lower elevations.
(
Mrs. Sandy Bierly
Environmental Status ,Report
June 1, 2000
Page 3
The second wetland system within the limits of the parent parcel is located
within the southern portion of the plant property, just south and adjacent to
the Seminole County retention pond. This system is a mixed wetland
hardwood community (FLUCCS* - 61 7) that is dominated by a canopy of
sweetgum, loblolly bay, red bay, and scattered pond pine; a sub-canopy of
like species, sabal palm, wax myrtle, and dahoon holly; and an understory of
cinnamon fern, chain fern; greenbriar, and muscadine. This portion of the
overall forested wetlands is hydrologically fed from a receiving body located
to the west of Tuskawilla Road. Once the. surface water is collected, it
drains west into the sU,bject wetland system via a culvert underneath
Tuskawilla Road. More specifically, it empties into a small pond (FLUCCS* -
524) that is dominated by a blanket of duckweed. Once the surface water
stages up, it then sheetflows into the forested wetland, flowing west and
eventually reaching Lake Jessup.
(
The subject wetland has been delineated via flagging and has been labeled
MEC 101 thru MEC 123 along the southwestern boundary, MEC 201 thru MEC
213 along the northwestern boundary, and MEC 301 thru MEC 328 along its'
southern boundary. An aerial has been attached for your review with the
approximate boundaries and jurisdictional limits delineated.
SOILS SURVEY
While on-site, the subject property's soils were reviewed and were found to
be consistent with the identification of soils as listed within the Seminole
County Soils Survey. Soils'found to exist on-site based upon the soils survey
are as follows: 'Adamsville-Sparr fine sands (2); Basinger, Samsula, and
Hontoon soils, depressional (10); Basinger and Smyrna fine sands,
depressional (11); Felda and Manatee mucky fine sands, depressional (11);
and Myakka and EauGallie fine sands (20).
(
('
Mrs. Sandy Bierly
Environmental Status Report
June 1, 2000
Pa ge 4
WILDLIFE ANALYSIS
At this time, authorization has only been given for the review of the Plante
property. The Plante property has been extensively analyzed to determine
the extent of'. utilization by wildlife, with special.., emphasis given to
endangered, threatened, or special concern species, as listed by the Florida
Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FF&WCC) and the US Fish and
Wildlife Service (USF&WS). The wildlife survey was conducted utilizing
pedestrian transects of the site, in compliance with the FG&FWFC's technical
manual entitled Wildlife Methodologies Guidelines. No species of wildlife
listed as either being endangered, threatened, or of -special concern was
observed residing within or utilizing this property.
('
However, it should be noted that an eagle's nest, which has been previously
determined by the FF&WCC to be active,"is known to exist off-site to the
west. This nest, SE 002, may be located within 1500' of the subject
properties. If this is the case, the project may be located within the nest's
primary or secondary protection zones and would therefore have certain
development restrictions that may apply. More detailed coordination with
the agencies will occur following submittal of site plan information to the
FF&WCC and USF&WS offices.
LISTED PLANT SPECIES ANALYSIS
No species of plant listed as being rare or endangered was observed within
the boundaries of. the Plante property. However, the following species is
listed as being commercially exploited by the USF&WS commission: cinnamon
fern (Osmunda cinnamomea). Although this species is listed, there are no
restrictions toward the development of the property.
As stated above, no wildlife review of the Tuskawilla Trails property has been
performed or authorized.
(
Mrs. Sandy Bierly
Environmental Status' Report
June 1, 2000
Page 5
If you, have any questions or concerns regarding this information, or if you
need any additional information, please contact me at my office. Thank you.
~
Stephen Butler
Morgan Environmental Consulting, Inc.
attachment: aerial with approximate boundary and wetland delineations
(..
BoWYER
SJIN'GlLE1DN
& AssociATES, INCORPORATED
(NCINUIUNQ . P..ANNINCi . Sl,jAV('t'INC . fN'i'IACH"!Nll1
,
(,
\
Exhibit K
Wetland Map
(
(
(
F~......'.'..
.-" ..... : ....
"....-. "
- ". '. '.
..... ........ i.:
.. .' .
~ ":'. ", ' , ,
- ,
" ,
"
',j'
7
'-..-
L A K E
3
J ,E S SUP
9,
3176
4.
42'30"
3175
3173
.~...>...-~ .
.' "..- .."-.
~
North
Wetlands
Map
~'mo~
& AssOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Tuskawilla
Road Site
Prepared For:
CHC Development Co., Inc.
(NCIN([fUNC . PlANNINC . SU"V[VINC . (NVU\ONM(H'..
Comprehensive Policy
Plan Amendment
520 SOUTH MAGNOLIA AVENUE
ORLANDO. FLORIDA 32801
(407) 843-5120
FAX 407-649-8664
7-20-00 TSWI
(
BoWYER
SlINGLETON
& AssOCJ^TES, INCORPO~TED
(NCINUAIHC . PLANNINC . SUllvnlNC . lNVUIOHMIN1.u
(
Exhibit L
Geotechnical Report
IT] g~~~~~~~~~~t,~",""."."
~ Environmental SCIences' Construcuon Materials Testing
Ol/ices in
. O,'ando
. Gainesville
. Fort Myers
. Rock/edge
. SI, Augustine
. Daytona Beach
. Wesl Palm Beach
. Jacksonville
. Ocala
. Tampa
. Debary
{
\
May 31,2000
CHC Development Co., Inc.
131 Park Lake Street
Orlando, Florida 32803
Attention:
Mr.' Carl H. Cahill
Reference: Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration
Tuskawilla Road Subdivision, BSA 14
Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida
Project No. 17636-004-01
Report No. 117384
( .
Dear Mr. Cahill:
Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. has completed the preliminary geotechnical investigation
of the 24-acre property located on State Road 434 in Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida.
The scope of this investigation was conducted in conjunction with, and authorized by, you.
1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
We understand you are considering developing a 24 acre site located on the west of Tuskawilla
Road, just south of SR 434 in Seminole County. We have been supplied with a faxed tax map
showing the property geometry. Further, you have identified concerns related to the presence
of hardpan soils. This preliminary evaluation will identify the general soils and groundwater
conditions on the site.
This report contains the results of our investigations, information of the general subsurface
conditions, the presence or lack of unsuitable soils, and recommendations on the estimated
seasonal high groundwater conditions, preliminary foundation design, pavement design,
preliminary site preparation and potential geotechnical constraints to the proposed
development.
,
'.
Page 1 of 5 Pages
3532 Maggie Blvd, . Orlando, FI 32811 . (407) 423-0504 . Fax (407) 423-3106
Project No.
Report No.
17636-004-01
117384
2.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION
At present the subject site is a partially cleared, undeveloped land with moderate to heavy
vegetation consisting mostly of pine and oak trees. As part of this preliminary geotechnical
exploration, the subsurface conditions across the site were investigated with a total of ten hand
auger borings advanced to depths of 7 feet each below existing grades. The approximate
locations of these soil borings (designated as AB-1 through AB-1 0) are presented in Appendix
A-1: Boring Location Plan.
The soil borings were performed by manually advancing a 3-inch diameter by 7-inch length,
auger attached to a slender, solid stem into the soil to the required depth. The soil type is
evaluated by visual observation from the cuttings obtained from the auger.
Samples of the soils encountered at each representative soil layers encountered in the test pit
were obtained and saved in glass jars for visual inspection. These jar samples will be held in
our laboratory for your inspection for 60 days unless we are notified otherwise.
3.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
(
The subsurface conditions encountered at the boring locations consisted of mostly light brown,
grayish brown to dark brown, fine sands with trace of silt extending from the ground surface to
the depth of termination of 7 feet. At the time of our investigation, the groundwater table was
encountered at a depth of about 6.9 feet at three of the ten soil borings. Groundwater table
was not encountered to the depth of termination of 7 feet in the remaining borings. Deeper soil
borings will need to be performed to evaluate the groundwater table depths and elevations at
the subject site.
The boring locations and detailed subsurface conditions are illustrated in Appendix A: Boring
Location Plan and Appendix B: Boring Logs. The classifications and descriptions shown on the
logs are generally based upon visual characterizations of the recovered soil samples and a
limited number of laboratory tests. Also. see Appendix B: Soils Classification Chart, for further
explanation of the symbols and placement of data on the Boring Logs.
4.0 PRESENCE OR LACK OF UNSUITABLE SOILS
Overall, the subsurface conditions encountered consisted predominantly of relatively clean fine
sands with varying amounts of silt. While the surficial sandy soils are likely to be loose in
nature and may need extra compaction during site preparation, it should be suitable for support
of lightly loaded building structures. There was no evidence of presence of unsuitable soils
such as organic muck or soft clays within the depths encountered.
Page 2 of 5 Pages
E!3
Project No,
Report No,
17636-004-01
117384
( 5.0 ESTIMATED SEASONAL HIGH GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS
The groundwater table will fluctuate seasonally depending upon local rainfall. The rainy season
in Central Florida is normally between June and September. Based upon our review of
U.S.G.S. data, Seminole County Soils Survey, and regional hydrogeology, our best estimate
for the seasonal high groundwater table could be on the order of at least 4.5 feet to 5 feet below
the existing ground surface at the soil boring locations. The existing and estimated seasonal
high groundwater table at each location appears in Appendix B: Boring Logs.
It should be noted that the estimated seasonal high groundwater levels do not provide any
assurance that groundwater levels will not exceed these estimated levels during any given year
- in the future. ,Should'impediments to surface water drainage exist on the site, or should rainfall
intensity and duration, or total rainfall quantities, exceed the normally anticipated rainfall
quantities, groundwater levels may exceed our seasonal high estimates.
6.0 PRELIMINARY FOUNDATION DESIGN
(-
Based on the subsurface conditions encountered at the site, we anticipate that relatively lightly
loaded structures may be founded on conventional, shallow spread foundations or on
reinforced monolithic slabs with conventional site preparation. T~e actual design of the
foundations will most likely be governed by, building structure type, wall and column loads and
the allowable settlement for the structures. A comprehensive subsurface exploration and
analysis are necessary for the final foundation design and the site civil design of pavement
grades and retention ponds. Therefore, we strongly recommend the foundation design should
be based on additional information obtained from a comprehensive subsurface exploration
program. '
7.0 PRELIMINARY PAVEMENT DESIGN
We recommend using a flexible pavement section for the design of parking lots and driveways.
Flexible pavements combine the strength and durability of several layer components to produce
an appropriate and cost-effective combination of available materials. For preliminary pavement
designs, we recommend using a three-layer pavement section consisting of stabilized
subgrade, base course, and surface course. A stabilized subgrade may be required due to the
relatively clean nature of the surficial sands since these sands may not provide the necessary
stability during the compaction operations. The three-layer pavement may be placed on
existing, prepared subgrade or compacted embankment fill.
8.0 PRELIMINARY SITE PREPARATION
Based on the subsurface conditions encountered, it is our opinion conventional normal
site preparation procedures should be adequate for support of lightly loaded buildings and for
parking lots over a majority of the soil. We encountered only surficial rootmat and root material
from the dense vegetation; these are anticipated to be stripped away during the initial earthwork
operations. The site preparation procedures may include but not be limited to the following
procedures:
Page 3 of 5 Pages
E!a
Project No.
Report No.
17636-004-01
117384
stripping the site of vegetation and removal of surficial topsoil, rootmat and surficial
organic soils completely where encountered;
proof-rolling and proof-compacting the subgrade with a large vibratory roller; extra
compaction may be required due to the loose nature of the surficial sands on the site;
· filling to grade with select fill material in thin lifts and compacting each lift adequately;
QNQC on the fill placed and testing of subgrade soils.
We would be glad to provide you with detailed recommendations for the site preparation
procedures once the final geotechnical exploration is completed.
9.0 POTENTIAL GEOTECHNICAL CONSTRAINTS
Overall, the subsurface conditions encountered at the site consisted of mostly clean sandy soils
which are favorable for normal construction. Other than some extra compaction efforts to
compact the surficial sands to support light buildings, we do not anticipate any major
geotechnical and subsurface constraints that would adversely affect development costs.
10.0 ADDITIONAL INVESTIGATION
(
Finally, please note that this investigation is preliminary in nature and designed to provide you
information on general subsurface conditions and identify potential subsurface constraints that
may affect the cost of construction. The information obtained from this investigation is not
sufficient for design of foundation system, building and pavement grades, and retention ponds.
We strongly recommend that information obtained from this preliminary investigation be
supplemented with a more comprehensive subsurface exploration once the building, retention
layouts and the site plans have been finalized. The foundations for the building should be
designed based on the information obtained from a comprehensive geotechnical investigation
program.
11.0 LIMITATIONS
During the early stages of most construction projects, geotechnical issues not addressed in this
report may arise. Because of the natural limitations inherent in working with the subsurface,
it is not possible for a geotechnical engineer to predict and address all possible problems. An
Association of Engineering Firms Practicing in the Geosciences (ASFE) publication, "Important
Information About Your Geotechnical Engineering Report" appears in Appendix C, and will help
explain the complex nature of geotechnical issues. Further, we present documents in
Appendix C: Constraints and Restrictions, to bring to your attention the potential concerns and
the basic limitations of a typical geotechnical report.
Page 4 of 5 Pages
w
Project No.
Report No.
17636-004-01
117384
( 12.0 CLOSURE
We appreciate the opportunity to have worked with you on this project and look forward to a
continued association. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you should have any questions,
or if we may further assist you as your plans proceed.
Respectfully submitted,
UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES,INC.
I' 1
f'~ L/~\.c'l~(;v\
/.~
Shridl1ar S. Rao
Project Engineer
Lu-)lj~ S/~/l:Jo
Bruce H. Wolashin, P.E.
P.E. No. 36734
Manager - Geotechr.icai Engineering
SSR:BHW:cc
cc: Client (6)
Attachments
Appendix A-1: Boring Location Plan
Appendix B-1: Boring Logs
Appendix B-2: Soils Classification Chart
Appendix C-1: Important Information About Your Geotechnical Engineering Report
Appendix C-2: Constraints and Restrictions
Page 5 of 5 Pages
w
~apWYER
011~GJLE1['()N
& AssociATES. INCORPORATED
INGINUAtHe . PUNNING. SUAVEflfCC . ENVIRONMENtAL
)
)
Exhibit M
Soils Map and Legend
,
I
/
)
..'
)
LAKE
11
~ ::.".'<;~1~}~~...
}'. ;.6 .. ..~: >.:,.:;;;;:'_. .
J;:::..:;:~:--:~:-..;:~::_:~.;;'~~~,' .... .
3i ';'
38
Notth
Soil
Survey
~BpWYER
0Jlll~GLE1DN
&. AssOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Tuskawilla
Road Site
fNCIN(['\INC . 'lAHNINC . SU"V(YINC . [NVI"ONM(NIAI
Prepared For:
CHC Development Co., Inc.
Comprehensive Policy
Plan Amendment
520 SOUTH MAGNOLIA AVENUE
ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32801
(407) 843-5120
FAX 407-649-8664
I
I
7-20-00 TSW7
-)
)
SOIL LEGEND
The recommended publication symbols are numerical. Map units without
percent slope designated are either level or nearly lovol or they are miscel-
laneous areas.
SYMBOL
2
3
4
5
'6
7
8
9
[}Q)
11
12
13
14
rrn
16
17
18
19
[]QJ
ern
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
em
32
33
34
35
NAME
Adamsville.Sparr fine sands
Arents, 0 to 5 percent slopes
Astatula fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes
Astatula fine sand, 5 to 8 percent slopes
Astatula.Apopka fine sands, 0 to 5 percent slopes
Astatula-Apopka fine sands, 5 to 8 percent slopes
Astatufa.Apopka fine sands, 8 to 12 percent slopes
Basinger and Delray fine sands
. Basinger, Samsula, and Hontoon soils, depressional
Basinger and Smyrna fine sands, depressional
Canova and Terra Ceia mucks
EauGallie and Immokalee fine sands
Felda mucky fine sand, saline, frequently flooded
Felda and Manatee mucky fine sands, depressional
Immokalee sand
Brighton, Samsula, and Sanibel mucks
Malabar fine sand
Manatee, Floridana, and Holopaw soils, frequently flooded
Myakka and EauGallie fine sands
Nittaw mucky fine sand, depressional
Nittaw muck, occasionally flooded
Nittaw, Okeelanta, and Basinger soils, frequently flooded
Paola-St. lucie sands, 0 to 5 percent slopes
Pineda fine sand
Udorthents, excavated
Pomello fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes
Pompano fine sand, occasionally flooded
St. Johns and EauGallie fine sands
SeUner fine sand
Tavares.Millhopper fine sands, 0 to 5 percent slopes
Tavares.Millhopper fine sands. 5 to 8 percent slopes
Terra Ceia muck, frequently flooded
Urban land, 0 to 12 percent slopes
Wabasso fine sand
Soil
Survey
)
Prepared For:
CHC Development Co., Inc.
~BpWYER
0llll~GLETON
&. AssOCIATES, INCORPORATED
(N&INHI\INC . 'lAHNINC . SUftVIYINC . EHVlftOHMENlAl
520 SOUTH MAGNOUA AVENUE
ORLANDO. FLORIDA 32801
(407) 843-5120
FAX 407-649-8664
Tuskawilla
Road Site
Comprehensive Policy
Plan Amendment
7-20-00 TSWl
(
BoWYER
SliNGLET'ON
& AssOCIATES, INCORPORATED
INc;IHURINQ. . P....NNIN~ . $U"Y'f1,..C . ENVIRONMENTaL
(
Exhibit N
Property Surveys
-:.~:.~ -
- - -
.~._---_._...._.._--------_..
'f' ..".....;,...'
.__..__._. - "'-.:.0-"1'-_-'
i
i
!
i
)
!
~
Property One
"
j
,... ~--~
~
..".. 1-" 'told
I
:)
,
I '
I "I :
I I
I :
I !
I I I
I \:; I
i \ I
-- -----T-----\---t---"7'---- - ---------
I 'I
f - -
I 8l(:CKUt:f.
! - :--\
I -I
; :. .~"''''''-
I I
I I
f I
I I
I I
--------t----- ---'
I
J
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
i
)
I
I
"''--_-'____J
:;--:,-_ I
- I
os
IL<<K,l ~. """"<Lu -'U'MY Cf' Ttt!-~.., "'NoT
~ LMJ.us... PU.T .."-.. I ~ S
:
.
!
,
!-
:
!
~
-+
~
~
>
S
oJ
;.
"
2 ~
::, ~
" .
,.
~i
j.
.1Ii'-
i!
:l
Ii
"
;0
~
ii:
~
~
.,
....,-
I
-/
,
/
!
.
!:
,.
"
.,
r
I ~___
--
lESS OUT
',.~$7~~jt.l':
au."
! .
LMi'" JI. _. II.. f
,...j.cu..fIIllMvrn.~',
fJllIlllW CIM'f.. LAd.
nwt.. .. ...., -- .....:
aoa -r fIf uWl" L .1.
)la.'" fMt ... __ ....
:: :':.:- .:a 1: ::.:
~"'.....;.~
...~ 'ftIa*WA .. De L ;.
. w.sw~'_""M1l:II&i"
,..,..a_IIIM.....
..... ...-..'b ,..; III ._
NoN'" "'''D", IIJ1OI!
MM.a .... .-. .... ..
l....,~"_.l...a.
- - Coo
aSIa ~ JWl'" .~
~ ---.. .. "-1 ...
1In..... ,iM........ _'
'bt~ll,,,,,"""l'
fII..NUl:'lIEU.N&. ...
. ...........-......
M'te........ .,'s-f.M)o!
fII..u....au,.......'
.I.D........,....~.
SUI'rl\"NLI'rlILWl"
\
l . .Ilw,.
n.
. .
~ 0 ~:;
.)
.>
5
I
)e
.
!
~~
~~
~~
"
~a
~~
.e
~::!
:~~
;ili
~t~~
t~."
i~~i
..::!~
~h,
)"..:%!
~t~..
~tEi
"'_roz'.."-,, 1117'''53"
it
63
54
JUZ::P~tI.A:
"'.rDr40-" '~'..7/' .....-- ::: nr. u_
3.""""31-' ".'.40'
;:::-/::..n~:",:~~:_,.
.(VISIONS
IlIlSDI"'lo.
...
..
-
on
...
.....
...,
..,
-
.
....
.,
~.
C.'
"
"
C'
C.
...
.
.
..
..
,.
e
0'
....
,
J
.
'.'
.{
f
.
,
...
.
.
,.
'.
1'(_".'
BoWYER6JINGLETON
&. ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
u:~':;:.;.. ''';~='.I':...v'r:':':' .~:: ..;~.~~;.~;.: ;::';;.0 I
(
BDWYER
SlING1LE1DN
& AssOCIATES, INCORPORATED
(NGlreUIIING '. PUNNING. SUiYlTlHG . INVlJlOHM[NfAl
(
(
Exhibit 0
Property Legal Descriptions
(
lots 36, 37, 38, 59. 60, 61, 74 and that portion of lot 73 lying Easterly of the Southerly
projection of the Uesterly line of said lot 74, all being in BLOCK "0" of O. R. MITCHEll'S SURVEY
OF THE lEVY GRAlIT 011 lAKE JESSUP recorded In Plat Book I, Page 5 Public Records of Seminole County.
Florida and being more particularly described as follows: Begin at the N. U. corner of lot 38
BLOCK "0" of said O. R. MITCHElL'S SURVEY OF THE LEVY GRAIlT 011 lAKE JESSUP, thence N83050'35"E.
1929.61 feet along the Nortrlerly line of Lots 38, 37 and 36 of said BLOCK "0" to the N. E. corner
of said Lot 36 BLOCK .0"; thence S22.02'47"E. 2140,93 feet along the Easterly line.of Lots 36 and
59 of said 8LOCK 00. to the Northerly Itne of TUSKAUllLA recorded tn Plat Book 1. Page 5 Public
Records of Seminole County, Florida; thence NB7004'40"'.I. 911.83 feet along the Northerly line of
said TUSKAIIILLA to the N. II. corner of said TU'SKAllllLA; thence S03.34'20"1I. 1988.68 feet along the
Uesterly line of said TUSKA\lILLA to the t10rtherly line of GAROENA FARMS recorded In Plat Book 6.
Pages 23 and 24 Publfc Records of Seminole County, florida.; the~ce N84052'OO.U, 1234.64 feet along
the Ilortherly line of said GARDEllA fARMS to Southerly projection of the Westerly line of Lot 74 of
u Id 8l0CK' "0" .r O.R. 'MITCHElL'S SURVEY Of 'TIlE' LEVY-GRAllT' Oil LAKE"JESSUP;' thence N07"14 .15...,.
3634.25 feet along said Southerly projection of the lIesterly line of Lot 74 and along the Uesterly
line of Lots 74. 61 and 38 of said BLOCK "0" to the Point of 8eginnlng.
Containing 6,829.0n sq. ft. . 156.773 acres.
ALSO: That portion of Lot 26 BLOCK "8" or O. R. MITCHEll'S SURVEY Of THE lEVY GRANT ON LAKE
JESSUP recorded In Plat 800k 1. Page 5 Public 'Records Seminole County, Florida. bounded on the
West by a platted road, on the East by S.R. 419. on the Ea'st by lot 26LUTTRElL.PARK recorded In
Plat Book 11. Page 44 Public Records of Seminole County, Florida and on the South by 1 st Street
of seld LUTTREll PARK, and being more particularly described as follows:
Beg I n a t the most Northerly corner of lot 26 LUTTRELL PARK recorded in PI a t Book 11. Page 44,
Public Records of Seminole County, Florida, thence SI8.49'39"W, 117.93 feet along the Westerly line
of said Lot 26 to the Iforther]y line of l'st Street of said LUTTREll PARK; thence 1171"30'27"11,
8] .53 feet along said Northerly Ifne to the Westerly line of lot 26 OlOCK "8" of O.\.R. MITCHEll'S
SURVEY, OF TIlE LEVY GRANT 011 LAKE JESSUP recorded in Plat Book I, Page 5. Public Records of Seminole.
County, Florida; thence N22002'47"1I. 52B.84 feet along the lIester]y line of said lot 26 elOCK "0"
to the Westerly ri9ht-of-way of State Road 419 (OVIEDO ROAD recorded In Plat 800k 6. Pages 74 and
75 Public Records Seminole County, Florida); thence S38"42'42"E. 506.78 feet along said Uesterly
right-of-way; thence 518049'39"11. 9.48 feet to the Point of Beginning.
Containing 43.624 sq. ft. ~ 1.0015 acres.
(
Les:-: :",at=area of the existing Tuskawilla Trails devlopment
as indicated on the enclosed survey.
Property One
Legal
Description
BoWYER
SiNGlliTON
& AssOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Tuskawilla
Road Site
(NCIH([ftlHC .. 'lANNIHC . SUIW(YINC . [HV.ft.OH"'(HfA'
Prepared For:
CHC Development Co.. Inc.
520 SOUTH MAGNOUA AVENUE
ORlANDO. FLORIDA 32801
(407) 843-5120
FAX 407-649-8664
Comprehensive PoliC"/
Plan Amendment
7-20-00
TSWI
(
(
(
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOTS 25 THROUGH 32.39 THROUGH 64. THOSE PORT IONS OF LOTS 37. 38.
54 LYI NG WEST 'OF TUSCAWI LLA ROAD. TUSCAWI LLA. AS SHOWN ON D.R.
MITCHELL'S SURVEY OF THE LEVY GRANT. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT
THEREOF AS RECORDED I N PLAT BOOK 1. PAGE 5. PUBlI C RECORDS OF
SEMI N.oLE C.oUNTY. FLORI DA. TOGETHER WI TH ALL RI GHTS .oF WAY L.oCATED
ADJACENT TO THE ABOVE L.oTS AS VACATED BY RES.oLUT I .oN RECORDED IN
.oFFICIAL RECORDS B.oOK 1050. PAGE 401. PUBLIC RECORDS .oF SEMINOLE
COUNTY. FLORIDA. LESS THE,EASl.HA-l-F OF THE RIGHT OF WAY LYING
ADJACENT TO LOTS 25 AND 26 ON THE WEST AND LOTS 23 AND 24 ON THE
EAST:
LESS AND EXECPT FROMTHE AB.oVE THE FOLLOWING:
TH.oSE P.oRTI.oNS OF LOTS 37.38.53.54 AND 55. TAKEN FOR ROAD RIGHT
.oF WAY FOR TUSCAWILLA ROAD DESCRIBED IN ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED
'N OF F I C I AL RECORDS BOOK 3603. PAGE 1095. PUBL I C RECORDS OF
SEMI NOLE COUNTY. FLORI DA.
Property Two
Legal
Description
BoWYER
SINGLETON
IX AssOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Tuskawilla
Road Site
[NCIH(("IHC . "lANNINC . SUIW(VING . [HVUlON..(NUI
Comprehensive Policy
Plan Amendment
Prepared For:
CHC Development Co., Inc.
520 SOUTH MAGNOUA AVENUE
ORLANDO. FLORIDA 32801
(407) 843-5120 _
FAX 407-649-8664
TSWT
7-20-00
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THAT PORTION OF LOT 73. BLOCK "0" OF D. R. MITCHELL'S SURVEY OF
THE MOSES E. LEV'( GRANT AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK I AT PAGE':> OF
THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LYING WEST OF
TUSKAWILLA ROAD PHASE IV AND EAST OF THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF
THE WEST LINE OF TUSKAWILLA AS SHOWN ON SAID D. R. MITCHELL"S
SURVEY OF THE MOSES E. LEVY GRANT; BEING MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
(
COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF OAK FOREST UNIT SC:VEN AS
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 39 AT PAGES 16 AND 17 OF THE PUBLIC
RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY. FLORIDA; THENCE RUN S 84"48'49- E.
ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF OAK FOREST UNIT SEVEN, A DISTANCE OF
123.67 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY
EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF TUSKAWILLA AS SHOWN ON D. R.
MITCHELL"S SURVEY OF THE MOSES E. LEVY GRANT AS RECORDED IN PLAT
BOOK I AT PAGE 5 OF THE PUBL I C RECORDS OF SEMI NOLE COU~ITY.
FLORIDA. AND A POINT" OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE S 84"48'49-
E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF OAK FOREST UNIT SEVEN. A DISTANCE OF
1.209.13 FEET TO THE wEST RIGHT-Of-WAY LINE OF TUSKAWILLA ROAD
PHASE IV: THENCE N 14008'55- E. ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE, A DISTANCE OF 54.48 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF TUSKAWILLA
AS SHOWN ON SAID D. R. MITCHELL'S SURVEY OF THE MOSES E. LEVY
GRANT; THENCE N 87002'40- W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID
TUSKAWILLA. A DISTANCE OF 1.218.71 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER
OF SAID TUSKAWILLA: THENCE S 03037'30- W ALONG THE SOUTHERLY
EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF SAID TUSKAWILLA, A DISTANCE OF
6.38 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 0.836 ACRE MORE OR LESS.
DESCRIPTIONS FOR STREETS TO BE VACATED
THAT UNNAMED RIGHT-OF-WAY LYING SOUTH OF LOTS 55. 58. 59. 62.
AND 63; SOUTH OF UNNAMED RIGHT-OF-WAY BETWEEN LOTS 55 AND 59 AND
BETWEEN LOTS 59 AND 62; WEST OF TUSKAWILLA RO~D PHASE IV AND
EAST OF THE WEST LINE OF TUSKAW1LLA AS SHOWN ON D. R. MITCHELL'S
SURVEY OF THE MOSES E, LEVY GRANT AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK I AT
PAGE 5 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY. FLORIDA.
THAT UNNAMED RIGHT-OF-WAY LYING WEST OF LOTS 31. 32. 47. 48. 63.
AND 64; WEST OF UNNAMED RIGHT-OF-WAY BETWEEN LOTS 31 '\~ID 48 AND
BETWEEN LOTS 47 AND 64; SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 32
EXTENDED WESTERLY AND NORTH OF THE SOUTH LINE OF TUSKAWILLA AS
SHOWN ON D. R. MITCHELL'S SURVEY OF THE MOSES E. LEVY GRANT AS
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK I AT PAGE 5 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF
SEMINOLE COUNTY. FLORIDA
THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THAT UNNAMED RIGHT-OF-WAY LYI~IG NORTH OF LOTS
37 AND 40: NORTH OF THE UNNAMED RIGHT-OF-WAY 6ETwEEfJ LOTS 37 AND
40; EAST OF THE WEST LINE OF LOT 40 AND WEST OF TUSKAWILLA ROAD
PHASE IV. TUSKAWILLA AS SHOWN ON D. R. MITCHELL'S SURVE"I OF THE
MOSES E. LEVY GRANT AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK I AT PAGE 5 OF THE
PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA.
Property Three
Legal
Description
BoWYER
SJlNGLElDN
&: AssOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Tuskawilla
Road Site
(HCIH[(""NC . P'lAHHINC . SU/W(VIHC . (NYIIIlOH"HHr.u
Prepafed For:
CHC Develop~ent Co., Inc.
520 SOUTH MAGNOLIA AVENUE
ORLANDO. FLORIDA 32801
(407) 843-5120
FAX 407-649-8664
Comprehensive Policy
Plan Amendment
7-20-00 rswI
ATTACHMENT B
. - -. -... - '--- ,- '. '-' -' -"~ '"^"... "'->C IVlf\r; L.V"II~\:i MAl" 1HA/:1-1l; l;IRCULATION
ELEMENT MAPS AND TEXT AND ADDITION OF POUCY STATEMENTS FOR CONSERVATION
AND RESOURCE PROTECTION. .
CITY OF' WINTER SPRINGS
. ~'f;.:..
"
NOTICE IS HEREBY GI\iEN THAT THE CllY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WI/'ITER ~WRINGS PROPOSES ,~
ro ADOPT THE FOl,lOWING ORDINANCES TO CHANGE THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATIONS:
~ ORDINANCE OF THE CllY OF WINTER SPRINGS. SEMINOLE COUNTY, F\-ORIDA'ADOPTlNG A LARGE :.
SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMOO (LS-CPA:1-o0) CHANGING THE FUTURE lAND. USE MAP ::
DESIGNATION FROM (SEMINOLE COUN1Y) ."SUBURBAWESTATES" TO (CllY OF WINTER SPRINGS) .
'GREENEWAY INTERCHANGE DISTRICr ON THE 67.85 ACRE PARCEL (AKA THE EUZABETH MORSE' -
=OUNDATION PROPERTY) LOCATED ON THEWEST SIDE OF S.R. 417~THE GREENEWAY', NORTH OF S.R. '
~. . SOUTH OF LAKE JESSUP AND EAST OF SPRING AVENUE; PURSUANT TO 166,041 FLORIDA.
nATUTES: PROVIDING FOR SEVERABIUlY; CONFUCTS AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE, (SEE MAP "f>; RELAT.
NG TO TI1'~S AMENDMENT) . .' . . .
\N ORDINANCE OF THE CllY OF WINTER SPRINGS. SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA ADOPTING A LARGE .
,CALE COMPREHENSIVE PlAN AMENDMENT (LS-CPA-4-00) CHANGING THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP ,.
)ESIGNATlON FROM .MIXED USE' TO THE NEW "TOWN CENTER' DESIGNATION ON AN 18+/. ACRE PAR. . ;;
;EL LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE FOOT RETENTION BASIN JUST EAST OF THE U,S, POST ::
)FFICE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE CURVE ALONG S,R. 434: PURSUANT TO 166,041 FLORIDA .
. iTATUTES: PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILrTY. CONFUCTS AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE, (SEE MAP 'B" RELAT. . :'
NG TO THIS AMENDMENT)
IN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA ADOPTING A LARGE
;GAlE COMPREHENSNE PLAN AMENDMENT (LS-CPA"S-OO) CHANGING THE .FUTURE lAND US'E MAp. ~
lESIGNATlON FROM 'MODERATE DENSITY RESIDENTIAl: (3,6 - 6,5 DU PEA ACRE) AND 'CoNSERVATION" :"
'0 THE NEW "TOwN CENTER" DESIGNATION ON AN APPROXIMATELY 34,64 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON ~
'HE WEST SIDE OF TUSKAWILLA ROAD ACROSS FROM THE FORMER HI-FLAVOR MEAT PLANT BOUNDED , ':
)N THE NORTH SIDE BY MIlKY WAY AVE. AND ON THE SOUTH SIDE BY OAK FOREST llNli 7 SUB OMS ION, :
SEE.~ "C" RELATING TO THIS AMENDMENT)
IN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS. SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA DOPTING AN EMER-
lENCY lARGE SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PlAN AMENDMENT (LS-EM-CPA-1-o1) CHANGING THE FUTURE . ~
AND USE MAP DESIGNATION FORM 'COMMERCIAl: TO THE "MEqIUM DENSITY .RESIDENT1AC' DESIGNA- . ,:,.
'JON ON AN APPROXIMATLEY 36.21 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDE OF S,R. 434 AND : .-
IN Tl:fE EAST AND WEST SIDE OF MOSS ROAD IN GENERAL PROXIMITY TO THE S,R: 434 AND MOSS . :
IOAt? INTERSECTION, (SEE MAP '0" RELATlNG'TO THIS AMENDMENT) : .'. .,
oN ORDIANCE OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPIRNGS; SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIl:iAAoOPT1NG A CHANGE : ,.
IF ZONING (REZ-3-01) CHANGING THE ZONING'MAP DESIGNATION FROM C-1 "NEIGHBORHOOD COM- . "
IERCIAl:..TO ZONING DESIGNATION R-3"MULTI.FAMILy'DWEWNG" DISTRICT' ON APPROXIMATELY 35' ;
CRES LOCATED IN AND AROUND THE INTERSECTION OF MOSS ROAD AND STATE ROAD 434 (SEE MAp. :'
~. RELATlN~ TO TH.IS ~EZONING) . '. ;'. . . . . > '.' .... ", '. ' ::
N ORDINANCE OF THE:"CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS. SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA ADOPTING A SMALL
CALE 'COMPRHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT '(SS-CPA~2-o1) CHANGING THE FUTURE LAND USE MA DES. .
lNATlON FROM (COUNTY) 'COMMERCIAl:. "INDUSTRIAl:, AND "LOW DENSllY RESIDENTIAl: TO (CITY) . .
'ESIGNATlON "INDUSTRIAl: ON AN APPROXIMATELY 6,2 ACRES LOCATED ON NURSERY.ROAD JUST,'::
~.T ~F, u,~: 17/92. JS!=E MAP 'F' RELATING TO Tf:iIS A~EN[)MENl) . '" ' ':
N'ORbiN;\NCE OF THE CITY OF WlNTEiI'SP.RINGS: SEMi~OiiCOUNTY, FLO~Il;i~O~NGA CHANGE;:,
'F. ~qNING'(REZ-2'O.1)~I;iANI3ING THE ZONING MAP DE~ll3f:01~TlON FROM (COUNrv) C-2"RETAll COM- ':
IERCW:;d:;~'"GENE~ COMMI;'RCIA~ & 'WHOLESALE~,R~1;~ ',~INGLEFAMILY DWELUNG~TO (CITY)'
QNING:'[)E$IGNATlON.~2 ~GENERAl COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAl:. DISTRICT ON APPROXIMATELY.6,2 .
q~~:,I;OCA1.'Eo ON 1'lUf.\SERY RO~D JUST EAST OF lJ,S:1'7192 (SEE MAP,.;(r FlE~TlNO TO THIS'R~ON.. , .
\Wji'\~:1;i) ';~;'\:.~"~: i <\.::' :',q:;:r.i~'}{K',. :,~.;;,:,;; ':..; ......': :. ,.' ~
~;PR9iNANC~ Orm(CITY OFWlNTEA Sf:'!lj~Gs.':SeM.iNO'LE COU.N:rY.'F,LORIDKAp,qM1NG A lARGE~;. ;,
~,C9MPR~E(Il~!VE PLf'NAMENDIv!ENTM"cPA-6-(0) W!'i.ICHWOUI:OCOMPIEfE~Y-.Fl.I;'PLACE THE'.. ::
W .AI)lPi~S I~Jl:iE. Tf.l!\FFIC CIR~ULATlPN.!=~ENT IN Vc.>f-UME 1 OF: 2 ANQ2 OF 2. .':.:;,:. . .;':.,
'r .,. .......... ". ., :.,'.' _.' '. .".. ..~~.~~, "'-1' ......,,;.-./i,....:...,/.
rt.<?R!!I~CE.9f,TI:f!' CITY pF WlNTi;R. SPf:UN.GS; SEMINOLE GOl,JNTY; Flor:u.oA ADO.F~TING::Tl:fR$'(3)'.:'
\l'IGE,'SCA(E'COIv!PREHENSNE PlAN'AMENDMENT PROPOSAlS (LO-CPA-2,3.4-98) TOAi:lP TE?CT.. TO I .
-j!'J,A~I;>'USE. ~ENT AND THE.CONSERVATlON ELEM~:~D J~EA\30Y!'FlN!>1E;NTAtGQ9FlD!~,.; .:
QNELEMEN1>THESE' PROPOSED AM!=NDMENTS SE~ TO:..fURTHERENSURE'NODESTRUCTlOt{:9F,: ":
:.GETATI,O.N AND WlLDUFE..LOSS qF SlqNIFJCANT CULTURAL.AND ARCHEOLOGI~ RESOURCI;S:ON; .; .
IlY-QWNEO PROPERTY, AND THAT mE CfTY WILL COORDINATE WITH THE'RESOURCE PROTECTION:. .
'Mf,:~.F,. ~ffL' .F-r;~~; ~?;:F~~:~~~'~PI~O;~f.:.l~;!HE,I;lEW~f~~ f~'~'sptl~/.~:) \\, .
i,E:CITY..9.oMMI~SIO.!'l'W1ll:I'!OLD ~'ARsr.Fj5AD1~(3.0F.'TfI!;.ABOVE'9RDINAN.~~ ON'MARCH21,.2091 ", J
~~,;OO:I'!~~;'~9: W1Ll;:HQLD ~ S~C9Np (AD?PT!9N)\!J,~YH ~~INGpl:l ~EAB9VE 9.R?I~~E~ O~' ;: I
lWlt~~ii4~,~:~:~ll~~~~^5~i~,;~~;;' . j
i3;~~~;~~~~F~~;~c?~Gg;T;;~r~~~~~~~~~~:~~;~~:~: ~~~'~,E ~7~~,z; ';;h', . !.
~qNS.y.'I;{H DI~llJ.TIES NEEDING ASSISTANCE Tp. "'.AJlJlCJr~n;I!~~'OF,,THESE'PRqCEEDINGS , ,,' ~
.~9~P.;~_~~~~~;~~:~ RE~URC~ Q~ORDI~~q~'i4?~~0~r~~~~Y~1T OF J,~T. ~~~I:I.~ . ~. !
~ii@'~~~~::!i'i'c)Pci~C'@~(':APP.~:~NkA~CdM!vIEND~n6~~8sfdl~ifE#;i~~t ~.:;;. '.. .,~,
rn:;oMMISSl~CT-TMNY MATT'eR'eONSICEREOAH'HfS:ME&lNG~.yOlTvJltl.--NEEOA ?_a'-'->'c" i
;i;:.P.l;\q ~f.TIi~ .I:'ROlfETED.IN!3l? A/oIP'j'-'RR:~UCH.f'\1RPOSE$j, YOU:MAY ~~/i;qIW.:~N~!:J,REJ.HAT AYER. .
\~M.REqoRp9f. ~E PR09~EpIN,GSI~:~~E Uf'ON~'C;H THE;APP~I131Q;~~ B.AS.~9: . .: .
~'(;" .:... '\'\-;,~;[~:::;~";:U:',.:' .' ;:.:.:l~r:'i~;~:.,:A.'~ ;>ii,'::1H'.I):)/i:":;> . .."..,'>
,"'.... ., " . Co' .:: r;~: ":.;>" .... .,~ ,., MI" TI ....." 'd. "'.." .,' . '.' ,L. .
,~:,.:,..:,'.":.,:.':CITY: .',.' '.'0J:.'. .~~. '. t~~\\;:~w~r;;'h;.':;:;!_r~:i;::'; :'.:\~,'i~i-:::""":. r~,:;E~--:: :' .:
~" ~. :.....,. '.:,,:",'::':.:"'.- ':;~:~:"~':'::/,.:..::! :;~
'.'..:";,..,... ":' ,,,' ; ,,,. ~
~~i
';!:,
'.~I~~;.
:~ .~<
; ;",
: ~!~
1fF
~.IfT,'
:
.f
f
I
\
I
I
I
i
,
._-------/-,..
;i.
,~ .
'""".............
--
..-.....-....
, ;.......
" .~ '-;. . .
}.~i~m~~~~w~!iff,1~~~~~~_!e~{~i~~;
. "
',.l. .~
,
~-
. PVTvu l-. .... .IUI V...-rCWl
/oW' .
""'"
/oW' .
::.:;".....:
~
:n
~r~::-;:i::';:i'
..:......;.:..;
~.
;~..:
I
I
. .i
. ~. :=.
I
'. - .:.
I
. < .
i' -
f'
c