HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001 03 26 Public Hearings A Second Reading - Ordinance 2001-18 Elizabeth Morse Foundation Property
----
COMMISSION AGENDA
ITEM
A
Consent
Informational
Public Hearing X
Regular
March 26, 2001
Meeting
~
Mgr. / Attor /
Authorizatio
REQUEST:
The Community Development Department - Planning Division requests the City Commission
hold a public hearing for second reading of Ordinance 2001-18 to adopt the large scale
comprehensive plan amendment (LS-CP A-I-OO) that would change the Future Land Use Map
designation of the Elizabeth Morse Foundation Property from (County) "Suburban Estates" (1
DU per acre) to (City) designation "GreeneWay Interchange".
PURPOSE:
The purpose of this Agenda Item is to request the Commission hold a public hearing for second
reading and adoption of Ordinance 2001-18 to change the Future Land Use Map designation to
allow development of the property according to the requirements of the "GreeneWay
Interchange" District in order to take advantage of the commercial opportunities provided by the
transportation nexus of S.R. 417 (The GreeneWay) and S.R. 434.
APPLICABLE LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY:
The provisions of Florida Statutes Chapter 163.3184(IS)(b) F.S. which state: "The local
governing body shall hold at least one advertised public hearing on the proposed comprehensive
plan or plan amendment as follows:
1. The first public hearing shall be held at the transmittal stage pursuant to subsection
(3). It shall be held on a weekday at least 7 days after the day that the
advertisement is published.
CDD/March 19,2001/3:29 PM
\
MARCH 26, 2001
PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM A
Page 2
2. The second public hearing shall be held at the adoption stage pursuant to
subsection (7). It shall be held on a weekday at least 5 days after the day that the
second advertisement is published."
The provisions of 166.041(3)(a) which state in part: "Except as provided in paragraph (c), a
proposed ordinance may be read by title, or in full, on at least 2 separate days and shall, at least 10
days prior to adoption, be noticed once in a newspaper of general circulation in the municipality."
CONSIDERA TIONS:
· The City Commission annexed the Elizabeth Morse Foundation property on
September 27, 1999.
· Discussions were held on several occasions about including the subject property in the
"GreeneWay Interchange" District and later in the expanded Town Center.
· The Florida Department of Community Affairs issued its ORC (Objections,
Recommendations, and Comments) Report on January 26,2001.
· The Local Planning Agency at its March 7, 2001 meeting reviewed the ORC Report and
the Response to the ORC Report and made its recommendation to the City Commission.
· On March 21, 2001, the City Commission approved the first reading of Ordinance 2001-
18 to adopt the large scale comprehensive plan amendment (LS-CPA-I-00) that would
change the Future Land Use Map designation of the Elizabeth Morse Foundation Property
from (County) "Suburban Estates" (1 DU per acre) to (City) designation "GreeneWay
Interchange" .
FINDINGS:
1. Wetlands do exist on the subject property although the exact location and extent of
these wetlands are not known at present because a jurisdictional wetland boundary
has not been established by the appropriate governmental agency.
2. Wetland delineation on the City's Future Land Use Map and the County's Future
Land Use Map are understood to be approximations and only at the time of site
development review are they required to be accurately delineated. [ref: Goal 2,
Objective A, Policy 3)b. of the Land Use Element and in Goal I, Objective C,
CDD/March 19, 2001/5:01 PM
MARCH 26, 2001
PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM A
Page 3
Policy 5)a. of the Conservation Element]
3. The Future Land Use Map will be modified to reflect the presence of wetlands on
the subject property. [ref: Goal 1, Objective B, Policy I of the Conservation
Element ]
4. There is a well established permit application process in the development of
property, whereby a detailed analysis is conducted by the St. Johns River Water
Management District (and sometimes other agencies) to determine the location,
extent, and type of on-site wetlands. [ref: Goal I, Objective C, Policy 5)a. of the
Conservation Element]
5. The Florida Department of Community Affairs recognizes the permit application
process of the St. Johns River Water Management District for preservation of
wetlands.
6. The City's Comprehensive Plan provides for preservation of environmentally
sensitive areas through creation of an environmental easement either indicated on
the plat for the development or by a separate instrument approved by the City.
[ref: Goal 2, Objective A, Policy 3)c. of the Land Use Element]
7. The "GreeneWay Interchange" Future Land Use Map designation allows for
flexibility of mixed use development and provides a range of development densities
but does not determine specifically the mix of uses or densities. The City has the
authority at the time of development review to require a traffic impact study that
can specifically relate to what the development is proposed, rather than request a
traffic impact study based on any number of mix of uses and densities.
8. The City has a Concurrency Management requirement in its Comprehensive Plan
that can ensure adequate public facilities and services are available or programmed
at the time of development.
FISCAL IMP ACT:
None.
IMPLEMENTA TION SCHEDULE:
A public hearing for second reading and adoption of Ordinance 2001-18 is scheduled for
March 26,2001. The ordinance would become effective after 21 days of the issue of "Notice of
Intent" by the Florida Department of Community Affairs to find the large scale comprehensive
CDD/March 19,2001/3:29 PM
MARCH 26, 2001
PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM A
Page 4
plan amendment in compliance. [ref: 163.3184(10)(a) F.S. ]
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Commission hold a public hearing for second reading and adoption of
Ordinance 2001-18 to change the Future Land Use Map designation of the Elizabeth Morse
Foundation property from (County) "Suburban Estates" (1 DU per acre) to (City) designation
"GreeneWay Interchange", incorporating the City staff and the Local Planning Agency's Findings,
and the Response to the ORC Report as the basis for the adoption of the plan amendment.
LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY RECOMMENDATION:
The Local Planning Agency at its March 7, 200 I meeting recommended the City Commission
approve the change of Future Land Use Map designation of the Elizabeth Morse Foundation
property from (County) "Suburban Estates" (1 DU per acre) to (City) designation "GreeneWay
Interchange" District, incorporating the City staff and the Local Planning Agency's Findings, and
the Response to the ORC Report as the basis for the adoption of the plan amendment.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Ordinance 2001-18
B. Ad in Orlando Sentinel
ORC Report for Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment LS-CPA-I-00.
[ See Local Planning Agency Agenda Item II. E. Attachment I ]
Response to the ORC Report for LS-CP A-I-00
[ See Local Planning Agency Agenda Item II. E. Attachment 2 ]
LS-CP A-I-00 Plan Amendment Original Data & Analysis Submission Included in the Transmittal
to the Florida Department of Community Affairs.
[ See Local Planning Agency Agenda Item II. E. Attachment 3 ]
COMMISSION ACTION:
CDD/March 19,200113:29 PM
ATTACHMENT A
;;,
ORDINANCE 2001-18
AN ORDINANCE OFTHE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA, CHANGING
THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION ON A
67.85 ACRE PARCEL KNOWN AS THE ELIZABETH
MORSE FOUNDATION PROPERTY FROM SEMINOLE
COUNTY FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION
"SUBURBAN EST A TES" TO CITY FUTURE LAND USE
MAP DESIGNATION "GREENEW A Y INTERCHANGE"
DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF STATE
ROAD 417 "THE GREENEWAY", NORTH OF STATE
ROAD 434, SOUTH OF LAKE JESSUP AND EAST OF
SPRING AVENUE, AND MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED BELOW; PURSUANT TO 1163.3184(15)(B)
and 166.041 FLORIDA STATUTES; PROVIDING FOR
THE REPEAL OF PRIOR INCONSISTENT
ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCORPORATION
INTO THE COMP,REHENSIVE PLAN; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND LEGAL
STATUS OF THE PLAN AMENDMENTS.
WHEREAS, section 163.3161 et Seq., Florida Statutes (1987) established the Local
Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act; and
WHEREAS, section 163.3167, Florida Statutes, requires each municipality in the State
of Florida to prepare and adopt a Comprehensive Plan as scheduled by the Florida Department of
Community Affairs; and
WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency of the City of Winter Springs held a duly noticed
public hearing, in accordance with the procedures in Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes. on the
proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment and considered findings and advice of staff, citizens,
and all interested parties submitting written and oral comments and has recommended adoption to
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2001-18
Page I of 5
~
the City Commission; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to section 91-11.006, Florida Administrative Code, this
Comprehensive Plan amendment will not cause the City to exceed its twice yearly submittal
allowance for comprehensive plan amendments; and
WHEREAS, on November 13,2000, the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs
held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment and
considered findings and advice of staff, citizens, and all interested parties submitting written and
oral comments, and after complete deliberation, approved the amendment for transmittal to the
Florida Department of Community Affairs; and
WHEREAS, on January 26,2001, the Florida Department of Community Affairs issued
its Objections, Recommendations, and Comments Report ("ORC Report") to the City and made
recommendations to bring the subject Comprehensive Plan amendment in compliance with Rule
9J-5, Florida Administrative Code, and Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes.
WHEREAS, the City Commission and the Land Planning Agency have reviewed and
evaluated the ORC Report and have made certain modifications to the Comprehensive Plan
amendment originally transmitted to the Florida Department of Community Affairs in order to
bring the amendment into compliance with Rule 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code and Chapter
163, Part II, Florida Statutes; and
WHEREAS, on March 26,2001, the City Commission ofthe City of Winter Springs held
a duly noticed public adoption hearing on the proposed plan amendment set forth hereunder and
considered findings and advice of staff, citizens, and all interested parties submitting written and
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2001-18
Page 2 of 5
oral comments and supporting data and analysis, and after complete deliberation, hereby finds the
requested change consistent with the City of Winter Springs' Comprehensive Plan; and
WH~REAS, the City Commission hereby finds that this Ordinance is in the best interests
of the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Winter Springs, Florida; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER
SPRINGS HEREBY ORDAINS, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are fully incorporated
herein by this reference.
Section 2. Authority. This Ordinance is adopted i'n compliance with, and pursuant to, the
Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulations Act.
Section 3. Purpose and Intent. It is hereby declared to be the purpose and intent of this
Ordinance to clarify, expand, correct, update, modify and otherwise further the provisions of the
City of Winter Springs' Comprehensive Plan.
Section 4. Adoption of Amendment to the Future Land Use Map. The City of Winter
Springs' Comprehensive Plan, Future Land Use Map, is hereby amended by designating the real
property depicted and legally described on Exhibit" 1 " from Seminole County "Suburban Estates"
to "Greeneway Interchange" District. Exhibit" I" is attached hereto and fully incorporated herein
by this reference. Any real property with a "Conversation" future land use designation depicted
on the City or County Future Land Use Map on the effective date of this Ordinance shall maintains
its "Conversation" designation.
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2001-18
Page 3 of 5
Section 5. Transmittal to the Department of Community Affairs. The City Manager
or his designee is hereby designated to sign a letter transmitting the adopted Comprehensive Plan
Amendment to the Florida Department of Community Affairs, in accordance with Section
163.3 I 87(1)(c)(4), Florida Statutes, and the corresponding provisions of the Florida
Administrative Code.
Section 6. Repeal of Prior Inconsistent Ordinances and Resolutions. All prior
inconsistent ordinances and resolutions adopted by the City Commission, or parts of ordinances
and resolutions in conflict herewith, are hereby repealed to the extent of the conflict.
Section 7. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, word or
provision of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of
competent jurisdiction, whether for substantive, procedural, or any other reason, such portion shall
be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance.
Section 8. Incorporation into Comprehensive Plan. Upon the effective date of the
Comprehensive Plan Amendment adopted by this Ordinance, said Amendment shall be
incorporated into the City of Winter Springs' Comprehensive Plan and any section or paragraph
number or letter and any heading may be changed or modified as necessary to effectuate the
foregoing.
Section 9.
Effective Date and Legal Status ofthe Plan Amendments. The effective
date of the Comprehensive Plan Amendments adopted by this Ordinance shall be the date a final
order is issued by the Florida Department of Community Affairs, or the Administration
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2001-18
Page 4 of 5
Commission finding the Amendments in compliance with section 163.3184, Florida Statutes. No
development orders, development permits, or land use dependent on these Amendments may be
issued or commenced before it has become effective. If a final order of noncompliance is issued
by the Administration Commission, the Amendments may nevertheless be made effective by
adoption of a resolution affirming its effective status. After and from the effective date of these
Amendments, the Comprehensive Plan Amendments set forth herein shall amend the City of
Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan and become a part of that plan and the Amendments shall
have the legal status of the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan, as amend~.d.
ADOPTED by the City Commission of the City
.nier~b~Ori~' in aTegw~
~~~ .(~
Paul P. Partyk~" l\1f'lyor
meeting assembled on the 26th day of March, 2001.
A~TEST:. ,(
~b~c{-
ndrea Lo. zo Luaces, City Clerk
as to legal form and sufficiency for
'n er Springs only
ney
First Reading: March 21, 2001
Second Reading: March 26, 2001
Effective Date:
F:\DOCS\City of Winter Springs\Ordinances\200 1-18.kj
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2001-18
Page 5 .of 5
EXI-IIBIT 1
-..l
J
'j
I
.,
~:,t~
?:~:
]
~J
J
]
]
J
,
J
EXHIBIT
~l
MORRIS FOUNDATION TRACT
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Page 1 of2
n
]
J
DESCRIPTION AS FURNISF
.. Lois /,2.J.4,5 and 6, Seclion J2, Township 20 Soulh, Range 31 East.. ALSO Lots
/.2,J.7, und 8 of Seelion 5, . Town ship 21.South, Rango Jl [ast, (Less'beginning ....
20 feel [ost of and 274.1 feet Soulh of Ihe NW corner of Lot, 3, Section 5; run' [051
J66.6 feel (J46.6 field), N 06', 05' [,'. 50i'.3 feot; N 0'..'2' [, 32 ".7 feel, . S. 87' J2'\\',;
/9J feel, N 04' JO' W, 269.1 feel, 'S 89' '04' [, 652.1 feel, S "89' 56'[," .,..,: '.
420 feel, N 241.9 feel 10 shore of Loke"Jessup, Westerly'olong shore..l,286....
feet to Ihe [ost line of Spring Avenue; South 1,173.feef 10 beginning), being 91..
::Jcres, more or less: All above real properly being a perl of. the' Phil/[p R. ,."
Young Gran I accordmg to Iho plot Iheroof: os recorded In Pial Book' '1, . Page J5,'
PlIblic Records of Seminole County, Florida': . . ". ". . .... '. .;. .... .
:n
~
*'
"..
:~I
"]
ALSO'
.: ," .
J
::il
Jl
A right of ingress and egress over thol'l O-fool' strip of Icmd adjoining.. and'
running along the Northerly side of 0 line' commencing 20 feet [osl and 275.1
feet South of the NW corner 01 Lol.J of Seelion 5, Township 2/ South, Range: J,.
Eosl, run East ..366.6 feel and 0 right.' of Ingress' and egress' over Ihal /O-foat .
slrip of land adjoining and running along' Ihe; Weslerly 'side or line commencing. '.
.0366.6 feet Eosl of 0 point 20 feet Easl. and 274.1. feel .South or Ihe NIV: corner' of . ",
Lot 03,' Section 5; Township 21 Soulh, Range :.31 East, :run. N, 00, 05'::E,:: 507..3 :-:;. "':'." '.:;.,:
feet: Ihence NOO' /2' E,:.321.7 feet,'!:aid Lot'.:.3.:oppears' in. Ihe:plat 0(-.:'::""::':.:';.';. ....-
Phillip R. Young' Granl os 'recorded..in. Plot.. Book 1,..Page ".35" of' Ihe'Public Records -. .... >'.
of Seminole County, Florida. '. . . .' .. .... .'
"'.1'
1..
;<i.
,;\
. . .~, .
Less Ihe Eosl 25 feet 01 Lots 2' and 8 o(soid Seelton 5: less' West 25 feer of
Lois /,J and 7 of said Seelion 5 and les's West 25. feet .of Lot. Z and Eosl' 25 feet". ':.
'-"Jf Lot 03 of .said 'Section 32.' . . .. .
LE:SS
.". .',
]
oJ
A pori of Lol /, Section 5, Township'.21.South~'.Range' ii'::tost,"-ond'Lofs ";,2, and'.::
03, Section 32. Township 20 South, Range 'Jl Easl. of the.. Phillip" R. . Young Gronl,.. . ,
occording 10 the plot tryereof os :recorded oJn Plot. Book'.1, Page: 35. .of, the. Pulilic '.. '.
Records of Seminole County, Florida, being more particularly: described os " ..
foffows: . .' . ..'
'. '. .
. ..... . .
-l
.1
J
Commence at the NE corner of said Section' '5: thence. run S' 88' 49' 39","IV: %ng
the North line of said Section 5, 0 distance of .189.88.feet to the NE corner. oi', '.
said Lot I, Section 5 of the Phillip R. Young Grant for 0 point of beginning:' '.
thence run S. 04. 42' 40" W along Ihe East' line or said. Lol I, Seelian 5,. 0, .
distonce of 665.2J leet to the SE corner of said Lot 1,. See/ion 5: Ihence 'run .
S 88' 49' 39"'IV olong the South line of'said Lot 1,' Seelion 5,"0 distance' of .., . ,
204.39 feet: thence. deporting said South line run N 25' 45' 00" w,..o' distance. :. ;
'-"Jf I,J86.79 Ir!r:l to 0 puint on the East line of the. West 25.00 leet of said Lot ";
2, S::di.)n J:'. /h':Ih:l! r..1l II I) I. 1 r. It' W along said East line.o disla'ni;e' of .....
'.JUB.flu led 'v oJ puiot ,)(I tilt! fJ.:Jr/h line of said .Lol 2; Section J2:' thence.: :. '" .
dr!(Jodinq so;.) c:.).,1 I;nt: "If' S'. B.r -I 7' 20~ [.. along'. sOid North line' ci'. distance. .:. ":: . :. :
01 9.1 ~,O:) fr:r!t tu tho fiE c:"r:Jer :of s,J;J 1.01 I,' See/;on J2;. tltcnc~' run...:"" " .... . '. . .',
S 04' .J 2' ./u" IV along the Ells 1 linc. u( s;Jitl. Lot I',. Seelion J2, 0 distance Of
391.0u fet:! 10 Ihe point of br:C}inninl).
:.i;j.
:,..,
.~
1
OJ
]
EXHIBIT
~
D
D
:l
1
R ~
.I
MOlUUS FOUNDATION TRACT
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Page 2 of 2
l
AND ALSO LESS
J
'. ". .',
Cummence at the NE c'orner' of s~/d Sec'tion 5 ~/so. being" 'the. S( c~r~er. 'of sl,:d
Section J2;. thence run S 88' 49'. J9M .W olon'g the North line. of. said Section 5. '. ,
also being the South line of soid' Section J2; a distance 'of .., ,088.05. jeet to.o.... :.
point on the West line of the East 25.00 feet of said Lot 'J, .Section 32; th~ncc. '.' .... .
deporting the South line of said Section 5 and the' South - line' of. said. Section .,: ..... .. . . ....: .
J2, run N 01: 17' 12M 1'1 along said West line, 0 distance of 709.22 feet lor. O. . .
.' point of beginning; thence deporting. said West line run N. 25' 4~'OOM..IV.. o' '. .
distance of 10J.97 feet; thence run. S 88' 46' <S8N, W. 0 distance of. 69,9J. feet
. to. a pomt ori-the fast line of'Amehded Plot of First.Addition to: Mitieral .;. '.' '. .
" Springs, according to the plot there,:.f, as.recorded. in Plct. Boo.k. a, PClqes .45 'o.1d.'. ......
.4/ of the ?ut.lic Records of Semi:lcAe County;' Florido;' thenCe) :1.1..... N (: l' C.')' ..,:;:,.; ;-;
o/ong'said Cost line Il distance of 225.66. feet to 0 point on the North'li"e of.:'. ..,......
said Lol J, Secfion.J2: rhence deporting'said Eost line,ru., S'8J.'47".20".~.t ~.':".....' ..".
v/ong said Narth line, a distance of I IJAJ feet to a point of tho' aforesaid,.:. '.
IVest line of the fast 25.00 feet of said Lot J, "Section 32: thence deporting
said North line run SO,' .17' 12M. E along said \Vest line' 0 distance':' of' J05.58
(eet 10 the point o{ beginning.
\. .
'd
:J.
d
s')
U'
]
ALSO LESS
.". . ::'
A port of the West 25.00 feet of Lot 2 o~d the Eas'i '25.00" fe~t "of Lot' 3, Sec/ian '.
.32, Township 20 South. Range 31. East 0-' the Philtip R, Young Grant, according to
the plot thereof, os recorded in Plot Book. 7, Page J5 of the. Public Records cf.
Seminole County. Florida,. being more' po:(icularly described os (ollolVs::...' .:'
:J
'1
Commence at the S( corner of said Section 32; thence' run S 88' 49' 39" W along'
the South line of said Section J2, a distonce of 1,OJ8.05 feet to a point 0(1 the
East line of the West 25.00 feet of said Lot 2; thence 'deporting said South' line
run N 07' 17' 72- W along'said East line.a distance of 599.42 feet for 0 point.
of beginning; thence deporting soid East line run N 25' 45' DON W a. dislance .'
'of 720.74 feet 10 0 point on' the Wesl line of the' [ast 25.00. feet of said Lot J;
thence run N 07' 77' 72- W along said West line 0 dislance of. J05.58 . feet lei 0
point on the North line of said Lot J; thence' departing said West . line'. run . ..'
S 8J' 47' 20M E along the North tine of said' Lot" 2 and J' a . distance of 50.4J . ,
feet to a point on the East lino - of the. Wost25.00 feet of said Lot. .2; thence '. .
deporting said North. line run S 07'. 17' 12N E along said East line 0 distance. :.'
of 408.90 feet to the point. of beg;n~ing, '..;., - . . --: .... ,.
'J
-\
J
I
.J
}
.J
:...: "
J
.' . .... ,
. .
. ~.
"
.... .:. ',.
:. .
. .
-, . .
. '..
. ',':.."
...... .
. . .. '. ':".: .:. .
;'.= .",. .,,: .... .....-:...
}
i
I
J
EXHIBIT
b
:is
D
B
\ .
67,850
TOTAL
ACRES
(NDr EXCLUDINC)
ANY INT[.'?IOR
PLATTED P./W
OR LESS OuTS
FER OESCR:?TiDN
,I
,/
..
:. '\
, ,
U
. )
u
u
:J
~
i)
:\ ~
~ ~
iJ
:'~ ::b
U ~
] ~
:,'!
~
if .~
~
J ~
~
~
]
,;
J
,;-...
;;j
:i
.
1
::.1
1
'1
EXHIBIT
." I
\Jl
~
~
~
M
':'--
~
-...:l
\
GRAPHIC SCALE
300 C 1~ JOI) C""
I. . ." ....:.:.. k1;,~ .:_._ kt.~Aoo-'~'"7~"';"::'
~~.~ ~~
( l!li FEET )
1 inch 300 fl
ATTACHMENT B
OTHER ATTACHMENTS
ORC Report for Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment LS-CP A-I-00,
[ See Local Planning Agency Agenda Item II. E, Attachment 1 ]
Response to the ORC Report for LS-CP A-I-OO
[ See Local Planning Agency Agenda Item II. E. Attachment 2 ]
LS-CP A-I-00 Plan Amendment Original Data & Analysis Submission Included in the Transmittal
to the Florida Department of Community Affairs,
[ See Local Planning Agency Agenda Item II, E. Attachment 3 ]
I. AMENDMENTS WITH OBJECTIONS
A, Future Land Use Map Amendments
1. Amendment LS-CPA-I-OO:
a. Suitability Based on Natural Resources and Facilities: The City proposes a Land Use
Map Amendment Annexing and Redesignating 67.58 acres from Seminole County (Suburban
Estates 1 du/acre) and Conservation to Greeneway Interchange (5-10 du/acre,Open Space and 1
FAR non-residential). The City has not demonstrated that the natural resources on-site will be
protected. It appears that a portion ofthe site is currently in a conservation category under the
Seminole County Plan. The data also indicate the presence of wetlands over approximately 1/3
of the site and proximity to the Lake Jessup shoreline. There is no indication how the current
proposal for a Greeneway Interchange designation will protect resources such as wetlands.
The Department also has questions regarding the impacts to roadway facilities and services since
the analysis provided does not indicate the current 'and projected capacity and availability for
roadway facilities, FDOT commented the City lacked an adequate analysis,
Recommendation: Revise the amendment to retain the wetland and floodplain areas in a
conservation land use designation or other designation to. protect the natural resources on-site.
Revise the amendment to include an adequate transportation analysis. The analyses should
include: 1) An assessment through the planning period of the impacts to facilities based on the
most intense use including cumulative impacts (traffIc) generated by proposed amendments
herein; 2) Data and analysis demonstrating coordination of facilities with the proposed land
uses; and 3) An assessment of the timing of provision of services such that all services are
provided at the adopted level of service.
The analyses should assess the demand for services with regard to available capacity of services.
For example, the City should assess traffic generation with regard to available capacity on
existing roadways based on both the peak hour and the daily average trips; and should take into
account the traffic generated by proposed amendments contained within this package.
1
J
'-.1
'j
J'
J
Ii
j
]
-J
ti
J
J
J
Part 1.1
Application
&
Legal Description
-,
J
]
J
]
J
--I
(
.J
J
I
'J
"']
> 1
~'''}
.,
'.
I; ]
.'1
[;
.j:....!
''''j}
'1;\
L
'V']
~.'
l;~
.,
J
;1
,:1
_~J
: l
y
" J
,'~]
.,]
. ~ I
, \
'I
J
J
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708.2799
Telephone (407) 327.1800
APPLICATION FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDlVIENT
TO l\1APS (OTHER THAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP)
APPLICANT: Henderson Planning Group, Inc,
Last First
Middle
ADDRESS: 112 South Lake Avenue
.Orlando
City
FL
State
32801
Zip Code
PHONE:
407-872-3025
This is a request for change to
Future Land Use
Map
in the
Future Land Use
El~ment in Volume. 2 of
20f the City of winter Springs Comprehensive Plan as adopted
April 27, 1992 and as amended from time to time.
Reason for request of ~hange of Future Land Use Designation:
To establish a Future Land Use Designation on the Morris Foundation property
recently annexed into the City of Winter Springs,
TO BE SUPPLIED AT TIME OF SUBMISSION OF APPLICATION:
*
-~opy of proposed map
Comprehensive Plan.
* Comprehensive Plan
Applicant/Ow~nature:
Date:
Henderson Planning Group,Inc,
Augus t 2, 2000
. ,
I
. i
:..:".'1
',,' .
,~~.
,,,
MORRIS FOUNDATION TRACT
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Page 1 of2
~.,..
:F'
~{r
~L
'j
'~U'
~'.
..~"
d\'
lli1
ili9
~
'D"
. ~:
,
~"
,',
~~.
DESCRIPTION AS FURNISf-'
Lois /,2,J,4,5 and 6, Section J2, Township 20' South, Range Jr East, ALSO Lois
1,2,J.7, und 8 of Section 5, .Township. 2/ South, Range J1 East, (Less' beginning . '.
20 feet East of and 274. / feet South of the NW corner of Lot. J, . Section. 5; rur: East
J66.6 feel (J46.6 field), N 06'.05' E, 50i'.J feet; N 0',.12,' E, J21.7 feel,S, 87' J2'\\',,:
I!JJ feel, N 04' JO' W, 269./ feel,S 89' '04' E, 652,1 feet, S "89' 56'E," .,..,' ". .
420 feet, N 241.9 feet to shore of Loke"Jessup, Westerly' along shore.'l,286.." .
f~et to the East line of Spring Avenue; South 1,17Jfeet fa beginning), being 9.7 ,
:Jcres, more or less; All above real properly being 0 pert of. the' Phillip R, ," . .
YOtlng Grant occordmg 10 the plot thereof: os recorded In Plot Book '/,' Page J5,
PlIblic Records of Seminole County, F1oridd:.. . . . .
. ..,
ALSO'
" .
~r
ill
"
A right of ingress and egress over Ihot'1 O-footstrip of land adjoining. and'
running along Ihe Northerly side of a line' commencing 20 feef Eosl and 275.1
{eel Soulh of the NW corner of Lot'J o{ Section 5, Township 21 Soulh, Range' 3 t.
East, run East J66.6 feel and 0 righl' of Ingress' and egress' over Ihot /O-fool
slrip of lond adjoining ond runn(ng along' the:. Weslerlyside or line commencing .
J66.6 feel Eosl of 0 point 20 {eet East. and 274.1 . feel .south or: Ihe NIV' camero( .
'Lol J, Section 5; Township 21 South, Range Jl East, .run N. 00,05'" E.. 507.J :'.: :..." ". -:
feel; Ihence NOD' 12' E.: 321.7 feet, !:oid Lot...3.:oppeors' in Ihe plot of.. ..'..... :',:.:',,:, .
Phillip R, Young' Grant os' recorded.. in. Plat, Book 1,. Page :35' of' the "Public Records -..
of Seminole County, Florida.. '. :., . . . .' .: . ..'
mID. '
T
t' \~
~
:iHJ
lill
. . ...., . '.
Less Ihe East 25 (eel of Lots 2' and 8 o(said Section 5; less' West 25 feer of .. '..
LoIs I,J and 7 of said Sec/ion 5 and les's West 25. feet .of Lot. Z and. East. 25 feet ':.
of Lot J of said 'See/ion 32.' , '. ,.', "
LESS
. "
j~
"
.... ,-
~~
.~
'~~
Jl
j
J<
-\, .
r
'ill.
...
. ....~
,.,
".,
]'..
"
. ~ F
"
j
. . "" .
A port of Lot 1, Section 5, Township. 21 . South>Range' J 1:: 'E:ost,' 'and 'Lots "1,:2: ond-':-
.3, Section J2, Township 20 South, Range 'Jl Eosto( the., Phillip' R,'Young Gran/,,:', .'
according to Ihe plot thereof os: recorded ..in PIal. Book".1, Page: 35. .of, the Pull/ie'
Records of Seminole County, Florida, being more particularly: described os
follows: . .' . . .
Commence at the NE corner of said Section' '5; thence, run S 88' 49' 39",' \v: n/ong
Ihe North line of said Section 5, 0 distance at .189.88. feet 10 the NE corner: Oi'. '.
said Lot I, Section 5 of the Phillip R. Young Gront for 0 point of beginning:' .
thence run S. 04' 42' 40H W along the East' I;ne or said. Lol I, Section 5,. o. . ..
distance of 665.23 feet to the SE. corn>?r of said Lot 1,. Section 5; thence 'run' .
S 88' 49' J9" IV along Ihe South line of 'said Lot 1,' Section 5, "0 distance' of .... " "
204.39 feet; Ihence. deporting said South line run N 25' 45' 00" w,..o' distance. '.: : .
of I ,J86, 79 fcd 10 0 puint on the Eosl line of the. West 25.00 feet of said. Lot '.
2, 5::cl;"n J2, tllc!tll:r.: ',.Il f1 Il/' 11.'. 12H W along said East line. 0 distor)(;e of ." ,
'4U8.~U fcd tv ,J pu;ot .>n In<.: I/,Jr/h line of said .Lot 2; Section J2;' thence.:- :. . '. ,
depodin>] sa;.) r'.''il linr:: fl/n 5'. B J' -47' 20H E olong', said Norfh line' ci, dislonce , .:., . ..
of 9-'9.0J It!et tv the tIE C;l-,(:Jer :of s~id tot "';' Section 'J2;. thence' run :....:...:~ .... . .... .
S 04' 42' .'C/' IV along the Ellst linc. vf s;]iJ. Lot l~ Se-clion 32, 0 distance .Of
391.0u feel to the po;nl of bc!yinninf). .'. . .
J
l
]
. )
.'
l
J
.i"
if
"
., ,
...
~1
"
~
~..?
J
']
._\
J
J
.J
'J ..
]
'j
j
J-
MORRIS FOUNDATION TRACT
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Page 2 of2
AND ALSO L[SS
. ' ,'., .' , .", ' .' \',
Cummence ot the N[ corner' of said Sec'tion 5 also being" 'the. S( corrier: 'of sc):d
Section J2;. thence run S 88' 49'. J9H W along the North. line, of. said. Section 5,.'. :
o/so being the South line 'of said' Section 32; 0 distance of '1,088.05. .feet to '0... .
point on the West line of Ihe East 25.00 feet of said Lot' 3;Seclion 32: lh~ncc. . .
deporting the South line of said Section 5 and .the' South - line' of. said. Seclio" ..' .,.:' .' .
32, run N 0 l' 17' 12N 1'1 along said West line,a dislance of 709.22 leel for.'o .
. point of beginning; Ihence deporting .said West .Iine run N.25' 4::,'OO"W'o' '.
distance of 103.97 feet; thence run. S 88' 46' 4B", W. a dislance of. 69.9J' ;eet
. . to. a point on-' the East line 0" Amended Plot o( First. Addition 10: Mineral,: ',' '.
Springs, according to Ihe plot there,:,f, os, recorded, in Plct. Book, 8, PClges:45 '0:1(1'. ':....
.'1/ 1,)( Ihe r-ut.lic Records of SemhcAe Cou"'ly~' Florida;' th6nC(; :"-u-.:.', N (. l' C.'j"1 :;:": \-;
along 'said [ast line cJ dislance of 225.66 feet to a point on the North' lille of..:. ...... .
said Lot J, Seclion. J2: thence deporting said East line, rUI' S' 83. 47",20'\, t . .',', ,..' :.' .
.:J/ong said North line, a distance of 113..1J feel 10 a point of thEi of ores aid, .:. '.
IVest line of the Easl 25.00 feel of said Lot 3, 'Section J2; thence deporting
said North line run $ aI' .17' 12~, E along said West line'a dislonce'.:af '305,58
feet to the point of beginning.
ALSO L[SS
. . ,."
. '.
..' ,,: ,"
. .:t
A part of the West 25,00 feet of Lot 2 a~d the [os! 25.00' fe'~t "of Lot J, Section
.32, Township 20 South, Range J I . [ost of Ihe Phillip R, Yaung Grant, according to
the plot thereof, os recorded in Plot Book.1, Poge 35 of the. Public Records .cf .
Seminole County, Florida,. being more' por(iculorly described as (olloIVs: ,:., , .
Commence at lhe Sf corner of soid Secfio~j2; thence' run S 88' 49' 39" W along'
the South line of said Section 32, a distonce of 1,038.05 feet 10 a point 0" the
[ost line of the West 25,00 feet of said Lot 2; thence deporting said South' fine
run N 01' 17' 12~ W o/ong 'soid [ost line.a distance of 599.42 feet for a pain!'
of beginning; thence deporting said East line run N 25' 45' 00" W o. dislance "
'of 120.74 feet to 0 point on' the West line of the' East 25.00.feet of said Lot 3;
thence run N 01" 17' 12" W along said West fine a distonce of. 305.58. feet 10 a
point on the North line of said Lot J; thence' deporting said West . line' run . ,.'
S 83" 47' 20" [ olong the North line of soid Lot" 2 and J' a . distance of 50.4J . .
feet 10 a point on Ihe Eost line' of the, West .25.00 feet of soid Lot. .2; thence '. .
departing said North. Jina run S 01"' 17' 12- E along said East line a. distance.:' .
o( 408.90 feet to the point of ,beginning. . ;. ": .'... .., .... ,. '. '.,
,".-:
, . . . ',~ ,
". . .
. " ,:':(. :.
.... ," '..
", .'~ ',:.' ~' . ," " ,~:: . '. .. ,
':. "
. '"
.. I ......:. ,
. ::. ':.:' ',:::: '. ".
" .' .'
" i
}'\
'~'.' J
;,llJ
1:"'1
;K",
;.<~'"
:.( ,
Ji::
11') .
i.J ~.
""J'
;',
.r"
~);' .
~.,...
........
.....-..
.\.....
:~~:::.
~~y
I,',
r ....
, (or
;13
'T)
"('
I {:..:
.,}.,:.
T\
i1W'
](!.'"
;h
,
,....
"II
,j)
~,.
:;~~;
-,,\.
~~
'J
,)
~J
'-~)
:3
"J.Hlt
j
:J
J
J
67,850
TOTAL
ACRES
(NOT EXCLUDINC)
ANY INTEF?IOR
PLATTED P./W
OR LESS OUiS
FER OESCRIPTiON
~
iJ
>S
~
c;')
~
:::::
~
~
~
~
\
\J)
~
~
~
~
~
~
-1.
GRAPHIC SC ALE
( I N FEET )
1 inch = 300 (t.
\
. (
,]
']
"'J"
.":'
J'
.,
~
.J
']
Part 1.2
-"1
tiJ
Agent Authorization
J
]
'}
j
J
1
iJ
]
]
J
.J
J
- )
l
I
?
'~J
"J
or
J
tW
J
1
.J
J
]
1
J
I
July 21,lOOO
TO WHOM 11' MAY CONCERN:
Thll1e~ i~ 10 sctVe: A$ OluthoriUtlon for J. Scott Henderson of Henderson PI;uWng Group,
Inc. to ..~c as ugent on my behalf on ~tters related to the Annexation into the: City of
Winter Springs, Compreh~$i\le Pllll'\ Aml:Ddmcnl, Planned OC'Yclopmcnt zoning and
ADAlDll apprllv?Js for lbc Casstdls site which is a 325 AC! tract localed in Seminole
COWlly, Florida known as the Genius. MOrri5 Property,
~#k~
Marc~t C~ceUs
Property Owner
'The fOTrgomg ins~cn\ W~ acknowledged before me thii<.-J \_ day of July 2000 by
Mlilrgar~t Ca&SCeUs who is personally knovm to me or has prodl.1ccd identifi~tion
~ml did/did not take an oQ.th.
~r. DA ^ 'lb. J... CQ~l :::0
No Public
'CUi' eN (\J\ ~soe\()
(Prim qr Type Name of Notary)
ra l~.l- -
~'wnb
O ~.' '~, KAAal M, OSORIO
rL \C1 :~ "'Y~'CC7J4~1
L..iT~, : EXPIRES: ~ 19. 2tlD2
~u...-..
)
J
J
./
,J
:0
'(::1
I: '1
;~"l
, .
, ._~
.' J
)
.tJj
W...,
~~,-r
".:-\
PARI' II
.,.],.
r...
",,,
~l
Wi
"'}
I',",
~~::!:
:k'
'ii1
~~:}
'ill'
~'J
.~ "
"}
jf
. ','1
,
I'J.,
"
LAND USE AMENDMENT NARRATIVE
''',.J
~:
r
Ii
','J
I:
j' ~ \
, :
f.
'....j.
i .;~
~
:J
i ,"
I
. t
-1
"f
'r
P ART II - LAND USE AMENDMENT NARRATIVE
. ~
,)
]1
..
. ..
....-
]
'j
J
~
J
l
.J
2,1 Subject Property
The Morse Foundation tract is a 67,85 acre parcel located on the west side of the
Greene Way/SR 417, north ofSR 434, south of Lake Jessup and east of Spring A venue.
The Location Map (see Exhibit I) identifies the subject property in relation to the
surrounding physical and natural features.
2,2 Adjacent Land Uses
The aerial photograph (see Exhibit I) identifies the adjacent land uses which are more
specifically defined as follows:
North - Single Family/Conservation
East - SR 417/GreeneWay
West - Single Family/Conservation
South - Vacant
The Site Aerial (see Exhibit I) identifies the land uses adjacent to the Morse'
Foundation Tract..
.1
J
J
2.3 Area Zoning
The Zoning Map (see Exhibit I) identifies the existing zoning on the surround
properties which include:
North - R-l (Seminole County)
South - PUD & RU
East - SR 417 & PLI (Seminole County)
West - R-l & RM-l(Seminole County)
J
\
J
1
J
Morse Foundation Tract
Page -1-
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
,"\
",.J
2.4
Approved Future Land Uses
The subject property does not have an established future land use designation within
the City of Winter Springs. The annexation ofthe Morse Foundation tract into the City
of Winter Springs was completed in 1999, However, the annexation approval was
separated from the Future Land Use designation which occurred due to a pending
purchase and sale agreement wherein the prospective buyer was to pursue the Future
Land Use and Zoning designation, That agreement has since been cancelled which
resulted in the City completing the annexation of the subject property and the Future
Land Use/Zoning application being withdrawn.
'i."",:,
I;:, ~.
, :
,:..,
,;'}
,., )j"
. .
.,'...:
r~~J
......,.
"-,il~
!'!ill},
~mJ
The Future Land Use Map (see Exhibit I) identifies designations of the surrounding
property as follows:
""1','
r;.:
i ~,;. '
':1
,j)
North -
South -
East -
Low Density Residential
Mixed Use
i~j
. """l
."
'; ~ '
l,,;
D
=llill
\'~,:] ,
~jJ
I ;J:'
"
,:
r
West -
SR 417, GreeneWayIPublic LandsIMixed Use
Low Density Residential/Conservation/Mixed Use
The subject property is currently an enclave within the City of Winter Springs
Comprehensive Plan with no Future Land Use designation. The amendment presented
herein will establish a Future Land Use designation consistent with the current mixed
use designation to the south and southwest.
There is existing residential along the perimeter of the subject property to the north and
west. This is historic residential with older homes that are approximately 30 years or
older with a number of mobile homes and a few newer homes, These residential areas
';]
remain within the jurisdiction of Seminole County and are a remaining enclave of
County lands,
!'
.....
",.,
I ,~
, h)
1 }:
J.i.
Morse Foundation Tract
Page -2-
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
".'J
":~
,:'
I
']
(j
;\
i. I
...~. ,I
2.5
. ""J'
.,
,
'J
.~
J
)
~..J
~'"
'.f..
:~.:i
~..'
]
.J
~
"]
2,6
': .1
.J
",j' .
.."\.
::~~.
J
:J'
"
'-,1
.J
'J~
"
J
J
.J
Proposed Future Land Use Amendment Request
The request to amend the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan, Future Land
Use is to establish a Mixed Use designation on the subject property. This request is
based on the existing Mixed Use designation on the Casscells tract to the south of the
subject property as well as discussions with the City staff directing this application for
a Mixed Use designation. Through this request, the staffs desire is to see the subject
property and the Casscells tracts developed as a compatible and cohesive development
under the GreeneWay Interchange District. It is the applicants' intent to comply with
the staff request and, towards that end, the two properties (Morse Foundation and the
Casscells parcels) are being evaluated to provide coordinated planning to present a
cohesive development approach,
Statement of Compatibility
The City has viewed the subject property and the Casscells tract to the south as an
important area to the future growth of the City in view of its location at the SR 434/
GreeneWay interchange, The City has evaluated the desired development of this area
and implemented the GreeneWay Interchange District to provide strict guidelines on
the development to occur in this area. The Greene Way Interchange District regulations
are identified in Exhibit II.
Once the Future Land use designation is established, the owner will pursue a
GreeneWay Interchange zoning application, The application of the GreeneWay
Interchange Zoning District will provide the necessary assurances of compatibility
between the higher intensity commercial/office uses and the residential on the adjacent
properties,
Morse Foundation Tract
Page -3-
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
J
.-]
'J
2,7 GreeneWay Interchange District
The City of Wintef' Springs has recognized the importance of the subject property (in
combination with the Casscells tract to the south) as a part of the eastern gateway to
the City of Winter Springs off the GreeneWay and SR 434. As a result, the City has
established goals and design guidelines to set the direction for this key property, The
City's vision of a mixed use development was the first step in providing guidance to
the future development of this area, To ensure the development is properly
implemented, the City has established the Greene W ay Interchange Zoning District (see
Exhibit II). This district incorporates a variety of development requirements to ensure
that the new development implements the City's intent. The design standards present
the guidelines to provide for the appropriate compatibility between the various uses
within the district as well as the adjacent properties,
, .\
.,J
-:1
'....
.~
:J
. -'\
. f
J
'J
. ~'
,,.}
J
...!
I .1\
J
:)
J
2,8 URBAN SPRAWL
9J5,006 (5), Future Land Use Element, of the Florida Administrative Code
pertains to the review of plans and plan amendments for discouraging urban
sprawl.
The following is a list of urban sprawl indicators with respective responses as to
why this proposed Plan Amendment does not promote urban sprawl.
Question A: Promotes, allows or designates for development substantial areas of the
jurisdiction to develop as low intensity, or single-use development or uses
in excess of demonstrated need,
Response: The subject property is within an area designated by the City of Winter Springs
for urban development. Although the property is at the eastern edge of the
City, the property is adjacent to the GreeneWay and directly associated with the
Morse Foundation Tract
Page -4-
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
'J
:J
{
J
"J
' ......
..
J
J
.J
m.....:,-
L1
:,..,
SR 434 corridor which serves as a major development node for the area, Urban
development is planned and is occurring to the east, south and west thereby
establishing this an infill area.
The intensity of development on the subject property, under a mixed use
designation, is consistent with the intent of the City at the time of annexation.
Questions B: Promotes, allows or designates significant amounts of urban development
to occur in rural areas at substantial distances from existing urban areas
while leaping over undeveloped lands which are available and suitable for
development,
"'J
, '\~
J
~
""1
rj
J
J
J
'1
,J
J
Response:
The subject property and the proposed development are within the area
identified by the City for compact development. Through the proposed mixed
use program, development of the property will provide for a higher
concentration in a desirable location thereby reducing the influences of
sprawling development to accommodate the growth demands in the City,
Question C: Promotes, allows, or designates urban development in radial, strip,
isolated or ribbon patterns generally emanating from existing rural
developments,
Response:
J
J
-~
J
The subject property is contiguous to the mixed use land use designation along
SR 434. The configuration of the property offers a logical extension of the
mixed use designation to the north along the GreeneWay, The existing
conservation lands to the west create a natural limitation of any westerly strip
expansion of the mixed use area. The development pattern on the south side
Morse Foundation Tract
Page -5-
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
\
I
. I
of SR 434 is a compatible land use pattern for higher intensity land use along
the GreeneWay.
"\
\
I
\'1
J
,'-1
".
']
'}
Question D: As a result of premature or poorly planned conversion of rural land to
other uses, fails to adequately to protect and conserve natural resources,
such as wetlands, floodplains, native vegetation, environmentally sensitive
areas, natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas, lakes;river, shorelines,
beaches, bays, estuarine systems, and other significant natural systems,
Response:
The location of the subject property is outside the primary conservation areas
of Lake Jessup as indicated on the current Future Land Use Map (See Exhibit
I). There is existing single family and mobile home development between the
subject property and Lake Jessup. By remaining outside the conservation lands
associated with the lake, the proposed land use does not conflict with this
policy.
::~~
w
:J
.J
Question E: Fails to adequately protect use of existing public facilities and services,
Response:
The proposed land use is in direct response to the change in the land use pattern
for the area created by the construction of the Greene W ay and the interchange
with SR 434, Adequate public facilities and services are existing or planned
to support urban development in this area,
...\
,..I
"I
I
i I
Question F: Fails to maximize use of future public facilities and services.
J
Response: By clustering higher intensity land uses in proximity to existing and planned
public facilities and services, this proposal reduces the sprawl character of
!
I .I
Morse Foundation Tract
Page -6-
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
. \
'J
'\
J
!J
, I
development that would occur if the intensities of this proposal would not be
approved,
\
'~..f
;]
Question G: Allows for lan~ use patterns or timing which disproportionately increase
the cost in time, money and energy, of providing and maintaining facilities
and services, including roads, potable water, sanitary sewer, stormwater
management, law enforcement, education, health care, fire and emergency
response, and general government.
I::;)
l'
~ '}'
'! .
Response:
The proposed ?evelopment will not adversely impact the availability of
capacity in the supporting infrastructure, Development of the subject property
will comply with the City of Winter Springs Concurrency Management System
ensuring that there will be adequate capacity for roads, sewer, water and
stormwateL
]
au
J]
'J
;~,
JJ
,J
The subject property is located in close proximity and within urban response
times for the City services for law enforcement, health care, fire and emergency
servIces,
Question H: Fails to provide clear separation between rural and urban land uses,
,
\ ~I
Response: The location of the subject property between SR 434 and the GreeneWay
provides a clear separation between the urban land uses of the area and any
rural areas occurring a considerable distance to the east and outside the City,
;]
'J
J
;]
:J
I.
Question I: Discourages or inhibits infill development or redevelopment of existing
neighborhoods and communities,
Morse Foundation Tract
Page -7-
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
j \
..}
..,.I
Response:
The proposed land use will encourage infill development by shortening the
distances from commercial and office land uses that are otherwise located in
...~. \
I,.:
J
the Oviedo Mall area, or other areas outside the City.
I 1
,
Question J: Fails to encourage an attractive and functional mix of uses,
: ~
,J
Response: By definition, the project will be a mixed use development that is the focus of
this policy.
:J.;'
. .
~
..~.
;J
-~"l
:~
"'j
1
\}
L),]
.J
:',l
:.1
,]
! f
I .,
J
J
Question K: Results in poor accessibility among linked or related land uses,
Response:
The subject property is linked by proximity to the adjacent mixed use land use
and is intended to be developed in a manner to ensure compatibility and an
inter-relation of land uses.
Question L: Results in loss of significant amounts of functional open space,
Response:
Development of the subject property will comply with applicable regulations
and criteria relating to the functional open space. The Greene W ay Interchange
District has specific open space criteria to ensure compliance and an adequate
provision of functional open space,
2,9 Future Land Use Element
2.9,1 Goal (2)
To preserve the natural drainage features within Winter Springs as assets
complementing the residential and commercial area,
Morse Foundation Tract
Page -8-
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
'1"
I .
Comment: The natural drainage character of the area focuses on the wetlands
associated with Lake Jessup, Development of the property will evaluate these
characteristics and comply with applicable City and State criteria related to this
natural feature.
i \
.J
i'~I,
, \\;
I:: \
,.'"
....~;.)
Objective (A): Perpetuation of the existence and benefit of natural drainage
features, excluding them from uses that require the support of urban
infrastructure,
fl.
'::"f.
;.\.~ .
I.'
'.('''1
:.J
Policy A 2: The precise boundaries of land to be permanently classified
Conservation shall be those jurisdictional lines prescribed by State
agencies at the time of field review preparatory to engineering
contiguous property for development.
~h."m':.'
.....:'
,h
<:.:,'
}:::
\;1
,~ .D
Comment: Development ofthe property will comply with all City and State Water
Management District criteria to ensure that the area drainage is properly
addressed and protected from adverse impacts that could occur in
association with development.
,"1
\ r
(':~
,J
(J,
'.)
.~)
Policy A 2 B: Require all wetlands to be accurately identified at the time of site
development review, Alternation of wetlands may be permitted, however specific
mitigation standards in accordance with policies of the St, Johns Water
Management District will be established to ensure no net loss of wetlands either
by functional value or extent,
; If
:,J
I'"'
\ .
" ;
:J
~..1
\
lJ
: 'I
_J
Comment: Development of the property will comply with the 8t. Johns River Water
Management District criteria for identification of wetlands, preservation and/or
mitigation per the Water Management District criteria,
Page -9-
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Morse Foundation Tract
\
;..\
Policy A 2 F: Wetlands shall be delineated on the site plan according to DER,
SJRWMD, and US ACOE definitions, whichever standard is more restrictive,
Wetlands shall mean those areas established as jurisdictional by the above
agencies,
fI
:~".f
-'f
.J
.~}.
..~
11
'~;J
]
',""
~
:~
Jl
'J
"
r
.r.:
)
J'
1
~'"
Comment: The project will comply.
Policy A 2 G: Developments adjacent to Lake Jessup shall not be permitted to
include Light Industrial, Industrial, or Commercial Land Uses,
Comment: The location of the subject property is not abutting Lake Jessup, The
existing residential lands provide a buffer between the lake and the proposed mixed
use.
2,9,2 GOAL 3
Once the preceding goals are satisfied, land uses assigned to the balance
of the undeveloped property will reflect priorities of unmet needs for
residential and civic-commercial construction determined by on-going
review and analysis of population projections and residents' demographic
characteristics and the feasibility of commercial growth, The siting ofland
uses will be amended as necessary over time to adjust to changes in these
variable factors,
.J
.]
],
J
J
J
Objective C: Allocation of acreage and diversity ofland uses sufficient for
civic, commercial, and industrial activity, either separately or within a
mixed use classification,
Morse Foundation Tract
Page -10-
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
All analyses should be based on the most intense use proposed for development as identified and
guided by the future land use map and future land use element policies, and should assess
impacts in the short-term within five years and through the planning period (to 2015). Again,
using the transportation example, the analysis should identify current operating LOS for SR 234
and 417, as well as any applicable local roadways. Include any FIHS facilities. The analysis
should then factor in anticipated impacts from any proposed amendment such that a comparison
of before~amendment and after-amendment conditions can be made.
The analyses should ~hen identify if and where deficiencies will be realized based on the LOS
maximums as established by the local comprehensive plan and FDOT. This procedure should be
repeated for a projected LOS through 2005 and 2015. For any identified deficiencies within five
years, the City should ,identify how the deficiency will be remedied through capital
improvements planning including the amount and source of funding necessary, the type of
project, and the expected timing of the project to coincide with anticipated demands. Ifit is for a
facility that is not within the City's funding jurisdiction than the applicable work program .
(FDOT, and/or County) should be used to identify pertinent projects. Any projects needed
should then be reflected through a change to the comprehensive plan and/or corresponding
capital improvements schedule, For deficiencies identified beyond five years, the City should
identify the types of planning strategies that will be used to alleviate facility challenges including
any revisions to the plan that may be necessary. The strategies should address the overall service
network countywide and take into account the anticipated operational levels through the planning
period. .
b, Internal Consistency: Because the amendment has not demonstrated consistency with
statutory requirements for protection of natural resources, and for coordination of land uses with
transportation facilities and services, amendment has not demonstrated internal consistency with
the City's goals, objectives and policies of the comprehensive plan as listed:
Traffic Circulation: Objective B, Policy 1 and 6, requiring coordination, Objective C,
and Policies 1 through 7 requiring level of service maintenance, Objective D, Policies 2
and 3;
Future Land Use Element: Goal 2, Objective A, Policies 1 through 3, requiring
protection of natural resources;
Conservation: Goal 1 , Objective B, Policies 1, 2, 4, and 5, protecting natural resources, ,
Objective c, Policies 6 and 7, regarding protection of floodplains and coordination;
Capital Improvements: goal 1 , Objective C, Policy 1, Transportation LOS
Recommeg.dation:' Retain the conservation areas as recommended and perform the necessary
analyses for transportation as recommended. Revise the amendment as necessary to be
supported by the conservation and transportation data.
Sections: 163.3177(1), 163.3177(6)(a), 163.3177(6)(c), 163.3177(6)(d),
163.3177(6)0),163.3177(8),163.3187(2), F.S. '
Rules: 9J-5.005(2), 9J-5.005(5), 9J-5.006(2)(b) and (c); 9J-5.006(3)(b)3, (b)6, (b)10 and (c)2;
9J-5.006(4); 9J-5.006(5), 9J-5.013(2), F.A.C.
2
C'
L
f'-
r
r-
f.
,..
'.'
. . .>
r ,
ELIZABETH MORSE FOUNDATION .
1'--
ORC REPORT RESPONSE
LS-CP A -1-00
I...
~..
~F~
tw.':'
r;
r
L'.: '
E''';
',"
",,'
\
r
I
I.
I
..-.~
r'
FEBRUARY 19,2001
r'
".
I
-'j
j
I
---I
'''I
I
~
J
1
]
J
1
J
J
I
ELIZABETH MORSE FOUNDATION
AMENDMENT LS-CPA-I-OO
ORC REPORT RESPONSE
1, FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENTS
a, Suitability Based on Natural Resources and Facilities: The City proposes a Land Use
Map Amendment annexing and redesignating 67,58 acres from Seminole County
(Suburban Estates 1 du/acre) and Conservation to Greeneway Interchange (5 - 10
du/acre, Open Space a 1 FAR non-residential), The City has not demonstrated that the
natural resources on-site will be protected, It appears that a portion of the site is
currently in a conservation category under the Seminole County Plan, The data also
indicate the presence of wetlands over approximately 1/3 ofthe site and proximity to the
Lake Jessup shoreline, There is no indication how the current proposal for a Greeneway
Interchange designation will protect resources such as wetlands.
The Department also has questions regarding the impacts to roadway facilities and
services since the analysis provided does not indicate the current and projected capacity
and availability for roadway facilities. FDOT commented the City lacked an adequate
analysis,
Recommendation: Revised the amendment to retain the wetland and floodplain areas in
a conservation land use designation or other designation to protect the natural resources
on-site,
Response: The Future Land Use Map Amendment will be modified to reflect the presence of
wetlands on the property. Exhibit A identifies the preliminary jurisdictional wetland limits
on the subject property, It is important to clarify that the final determination of the limits and
Elizabeth Morse Foundation
-1-
ORC Report ReJpol/se
:'1
.J
1
,J
"'J
\....
]
~..:,:':
,j::i
::~
W],.
'.\.'
~
J'
"
J
?l
iliI
':'1
lJ
"1
..:
.':'
J
,],
"
"
....1
~
.}f
......:
',q,'
.~
a conservation land use designation of anyon-site wetlands is subject to a detailed analysis by
the governing environmental agency which shall include the St. Johns River Water
Management District (SJR WMD), The extent of and location of on-site preserved wetlands
will be established as a result of a SJRWMD permit application addressing wetland limits,
preserved wetlands, wetland buffers and a mitigation for any wetland impacts,
Upon approval of the Master Wetland Conservation/Mitigation Plan, the preserved wetland
areas will be identified and a conservation easement established,
Through this action, the DCA should be satisfied that the preliminary wetland/conservation
area designation and the subsequent final designation will address the concerns and
recommendations outlined above.
Revised the amendment to include an adequate transportation analysis. The analyses
should include: 1) An assessment through the planning period ofthe impacts to facilities
based on the most intense use including cumulative impacts (traffic) generated by
proposed amendments herein; 2) Data and analysis demonstrating coordination of
facilities with the proposed land uses; and 3) An assessment ofthe timing of provision of
services such that all services are provided at the adopted Level of Service (LOS).
The analyses should assess the demand for services with regard to available capacity of
services, For example, the City should assess traffic generation with regard to available
capacity on existing roadways based on both the peak hour and the daily average trips;
and should take into account the traffic generated by proposed amendments contained
within this package.
All analyses should be based on the most intense use proposed for development as
identified and guided by the Future Land Use Map and Future Land Use Element
Policies, and should assess impacts in the short-term within five years and th rough the
pIanninKperiod (to 2015), Again, using the transportation example, the analysis should
identify current operating LOS for SR 234 and 417, as well as any applicable local
roadways, Include any FIHS facilities, The analysis should then factor in anticipated
-2-
ORC Report Respol/sf:'
Elizabeth Morse Foundation
J
'''1
"':J
IhJ
"J
"~,.
',\,:
Jill:
;~".~,
H~~
!\.'.
""J..',
...r
:\
~~}
~
;~;~
~
~11
h~J
~.,
.;:..:
'';h
J
.;J
]
]
J
OJ
J
impacts from any proposed amendment such that a comparison of before-amendment
and after-amendment conditions can be made,
The analyses should then identify if and where deficiencies will be realized based on the
LOS maximums as established by the local comprehensive Plan and FDOT, This
procedure should be repeated for a projected LOS through 2005 and 2015, For any-
identified deficiencies within five years, the City should identify how the deficiency will
be remedied through capital improvements planning including the amount and source
of funding necessary, the type of project, and the expected timing of the project to
coincide with anticipated demands, If it is for a facility that is not within the City's
funding jurisdiction than the applicable work program (FDOT, and/or County) should
be used to identify pertinent projects, Any projects needed should then be reflected
through a change to the Comprehensive Plan and/or corresponding capital
improvements schedule, For deficiencies identified beyond five year, the City should
identify the types of planning strategies that will be used to alleviate facility challenges
including any revision to the plan that may be necessary, The strategies should address
the overall service network countywide and take into account the anticipated operational
levels through the planning period,
Response: The Greeneway Interchange District is a mixed use land use category which
provides for flexibility in the mix ofland uses, Inasmuch as the subject of this amendment is
to establish a generalized land use category and the specific land use mix is to be addressed in
a subsequent zoning application, it is not possible to accurately identify the specific mix of
uses at this time, The Greeneway Interchange District offers a variety of detailed guidelines
and controls to ensure that development of the subject property reflects the desires of the
community, This zoning district has been developed to clearly establish the design standards
applicable to this property and thereby provide assurances that development of this property
will properly reflect the character of the land and its importance as a gateway into the City of
Winter Springs,
A fundamental philosophy of the City Comprehensive Plan is the compliance with the
Concurrency policies as contained in the adopted plan, The Concurrency Regulations provide
-3-
ORC Report Response
Elizabeth Morse FOUl/dation
". .j
'u.,
J
';"]
ii..
\.]
.~J
~,.."
r...:
,'~"',
W~:;l
-'d
'V.
..,
......
m)
~~.:
ill
ij
adequate assurances that prior to development approvals, the developer must demonstrate that
there are adequate public facilities and services available or programmed at the time of
development to accommodate the intensities of the planned development. Inasmuch as the
Future Land Use Designation is not a development approval and the mix ofland uses are not
identified at this stage of the land planning process, it is not appropriate to conduct a
theoretical traffic analysis based on a fabricated development program that is most likely
unrelated to the final development program,
Prior to granting the Greeneway Interchange Zoning approval, the developer will be required
to: 1) Establish a specific land use mix with corresponding development intensities; 2)
Conduct a full Concurrency Analysis including transportation to demonstrate to the City the
ability of the infrastructure either current or pHumed; and 3) Establish the appropriate
conditional zoning conditions to ensure a direct relationship between infrastructure and any
improvements necessary to accommodate the specific development program, Ifnecessary, the
development program will be appropriately reduced to establish the proper balance between
infrastructure capacity and development intensities,
~i'
I~~;
<i
It is clearly understood by the City and the land owner that the Comprehensive Plan
AmendmentIFuture Land Use Designation does not establish a specific development intensity,
Further, prior to development, the property must be rezoned under the Greeneway Interchange
District which shall include a specific development program and a corresponding Concurrency
analysis and infrastructure mitigation, if necessary, to ensure adequate public facilities and
services are available to accommodate the proposed development.
":~]
I."
,:',J
;,,.
I....
t~
':<~~
'~'.i
,.
:t"
""1
\',
"~~,
"
].
',,'
I '~'.
~".<.
::H
t .~:-
I'"
, "}
Jt
. ....j
g
.~
"J-'
u
.'
b. Internal Consistency: Because the amendment has not demonstrated consistency with
statutory requirements for protection of natural resources, and for coordination ofland
uses with transportation facilities and services, amendment has not demonstrated
internal consistency with the City's goal, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive
Plan as listed:
-4-
ORC Report Respo/lsf!
Elizabeth Morse FOllndation
J
Traffic Circulation: Objective B, Policy 1 and 6, requmng coordination,
Objective C, and Policies 1 through 7 requiring Level of Service maintenance,
Objective D, Policies 2 and 3:
J
..J
,I
, I
"'..1
..
J
~
Response: The mandatory compliance of the development intensities under the
Greeneway Interchange District, the City Concurrency Management System and the
fundamental requirement of ensuring that development intensities do not exceed
established Levels of Service herein demonstrate that the City has established adequate
controls to satisfy the concerns represented in the ORC Report such that a traffic study
is not necessary prior to adopting this amendment.
Future Land Use Element: Goal 2, Objective A, Policies 1 through 3, requiring
protection of natural resources;
Response: The inclusion of a conservation designation over the on-site wetlands
combined with the policies in the Future Land Use Element are sufficient to address
the ORC Report,
J
J
J
J
,J
J
]
I
.J
Conservation: Goal 1, Objective B, Policies 1, 2, 4, and 5, protecting natu ral
resources, Objective C, Policies 6 and 7, regarding protection of floodplains and
coordination;
Response: Development of the subject property shall conform wit the City
Conservation Policies as well as the permitting requirements of the St Johns Ri\'er
Water Management District.
Capital Improvements: Goal 1, Objective C, Policy 1, Transportation LOS
Recommendation: Retain the conservation areas as recommended and perform the
necessarr analyses for transportation as recommended, Revised the amendment as
necessary to be supported by the conservation and transportation data,
Elizabeth Morse Foundation
-5-
ORC Report Respol/si:'
J
,
J
l
]
J
J
:]
"]
~;
:"
'.
]
J
]
J
I
]
J
!
J
J
Section: 163.3177(1), 163.3177(6)(a), 163,3177(6)(c), 163,3177(d)(d), 163.3177(6)0),
163,3177(8),163,31876(2), F,S,
Rules: 9J-5,005(2), 9J-5,006(2)(b) and (c); 9J-5.006(3)(b)3, (b)6, (b)10 and (c)2; 9J-
5,006(4); 9J-5,006(5), 9J-5.013(2), F,A,C.
MORSE/ORC/4135
Elizabeth Morse FOlll/dation
-6-
ORC Report Respol/sf!
~.. .
~. ~.. - -.- ~
. ,
f.'. -, '..
. (" 1'~;' .. ~.
I -,~ 'toO ',"
l
].:.
":'j"'; .'
. ~:,'
. '. ',:
"J "
,:'.: "
]::':[.;
:.:
;\ . .
..:.;.,:.....
~-,::
,J
~
]'.
. ~ ~
."'1
If
cl
j
'::)
]
Ij'.:.
J:$
,
" ]
il,,'
J
]
r~
l .
.'.:.~';., " "
~. "
'". " .
- . " ',-~~....,
.. -..-
.. ... i....' .- - .. ~":".:" ....... . .
. -
-, -. .... -.-... . ".
.. ,
.':..". ..... T....-..'. '7' ....
... .. ,- -..'..
.\.-
u; t{o B
aJ/"/
WI - ~t/
@ . Potential Conservation Areas
~~~~ Lotspeich and Associates, Inc.
I!. ECOLOGICAl CONSULTANTS
en Wnt F........ A_, SUl.t 201, ",,",or Pn. Ft. 3mg
(0107) 1~1.l42 Fa: 6ol~13CS e-M.a: l~acI.com
.<.:,:'(>
~.
.,!. :'" , ,"' .
.,' ....'
. .~ .f '.' :
. 'D,'r;~
.. .: :.,1 '...<;..~.'
.... }...............:y';."~;~~~~II~it
. " ',,:"",- V J..z., l.:."....._" J"~"}'~:"" '."':'
. . ":".) ....' I J' ..... .,;-:.:::,: ',:~:..<-:,,;:...:. . .
: . ' ..~. ::'~.J'~"~:"."'1":'~}~":~;: ;-:,.:
'. --...., .~.._.... ~ .--...........................,........"..,... '.r- .'~- '......
. . -." "'
. :~ '.. :',
. . ..:.,.-...." ....;..."".~.:....::.: .-..~;,,~..
.' .' . .
.~'..~ .. " ... ....... '. ~.. ...... .... --." . .
.. ..
. .... ...t. .~.~..~..:..::;..".::.::.:, ......... ., .
. .
. "h'
. .. , .
'.;'. . '.',' . '.;..
.. '::.~:.~:. "'~
- - ..'-;--........:-~.~.~....~.,~;l..~~""':..~,;.... ..:..... ..
.. '~"." .
-~- ~......-..-...-..-. ~..--..-..
. '. '.~ .,t.:'~'" ~ ).
Li J.. ... ). d-.
Lake Jessup Grove Property
96184,33 Date: 12 January 1999
Boundary Map
. North
+,- 7O.era In
SOClion 37, TownIhip 21 SOUlII, R41nOI 31 EM!
Seminole COU'lIy, Florio..
File:
96184-B,CDR Drawn By:
JM Job No :
Scale: 1'=4(;{)'
Figure 1
]
,.::.1
cJ
"J
L:J
\'q
!:;jjY
. <'~..
l'l:'
MORSE FOUNDATION
TRACT
'D'","
I:f:":
\"
j~'
1']
.:,J.....
:11
ill",
:k
':'A
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AMENDMENT
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
\. I
I: .
:',,-,'1
,.,.1
Prepared for:
,J]'
::~::~
.~~
'~]
~J
, ')
: ;:
I'J
~:"J
1.-
Ll
t,J
']
j'J
t.
Margaret Casscells
and
Pizzuti Development Co.
Prepared by:
I HENDERSON
PLANNING
HPG GROUP, INC,
August 2, 2000
. I
,
j
.J
.~).
"
".J
, 1
tl.J
MORSE FOUNDATION
TRACT
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AMENDMENT
-:-)
,,:1
SJ
<t'~""..
W'
.".
TABLE OF CONTENTS
'1
].'"
~
J
.f
J
PART I - APPLICATION AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION
1,1 Application and Legal Description
1.2 Agent Authorization
P ART II - LAND USE AMENDMENT NARRATIVE
1
J
2.1 Subject Property
2,2 Adjacent Land Use
2,3 Area Zoning
2.4 Approved Future Land Use
2.5 Proposed Future Land Use Amendment Request
2,6 Statement of Compatibility
2,7 Greene W ay Interchange District
2.8 Urban Sprawl
2,9 Future Land Use Element
2.9,1 Goa12 Review
2.9.2 Goal 3 Review
2,9,3 Goal 4 Review
2,10 Infrastructure
1.11 Wetlands
2.12 Soils
2.13 Flood Hazard Areas
2,14 East Central Florida Regional Planning Council and
State Comprehensive Land Use Plan
~. }
']
]
i 1
..,
J
,IJ
'.
i
- )
.:...
~~
,:.J
"1
: :']
-"
,T}
..]
]~
l!l
"~1.
.'..
,-rl
~
J
""t
.J
]
PART I
APPLICATION
and
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
'J
"J.
, .
']
J
;]
']
!J
.\
.1
Policy 1: Mixed use classifications are created to allow flexibility and efficiency
to development design, The reviewed land development regulations, to be
adopted by the statutory deadline, shall contain specific standards relating to
density and intensity provisions for each mixed land use category, minimum
requirements for allocation of residential, commercial, industrial and open space
land uses, impervious surface ratios, and landscaping and buffering,
Development standards for the Mixed Use classification shall include:
-J
.'j
I
:,]
"'J
l' .::-.~
f:'J.. .
'!']
')
,~
~
.'J
l
Density: No mixed use development shall exceed a gross residential density of 10
dwelling units per gross acre,
Proportion of Uses: No mixed use shall have a non-residential use exceeding 50%
of the gross land area, Open space shall not be less than 20%, and public uses,
utilities or wetland conservation easements not less than 5%, Residential uses
may take up to 75% of the gross land area,
Impervious Surface Ration, Maximum Heieht and Floor Area Ratios: In the
mixed use category, for commercial uses, intensity of use shall be limited by a
maximum impervious surface ratio of 70%, maximum height of 50 feet and a
-.\
1;
'J
.J
1
J
..1
I
.J
FAR of 1.0.
Comment: Adoption by the City of the GreeneWay Interchange Zoning District,
establishes the specific criteria under which the subject property will be governed,
Development of the subject property will comply with the GreeneWay Interchange
District.
Page -11-
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Morse Foundation Tract
j
I
.r,:.\
(~. .
l'
i~l'
2,9,3 (;()J\JL 4
.;81'
..L" ,
,.
'i;'
~"l
.'
:'( .
."'."
To verify that all development adheres to Concurrency requirements
based on the relevant levels of service established for public services and
facilities in this plan,
If']
~ll~,
Objective B: Prior to granting a development order for non-Residential projects,
the City must be assured that at the time of impact of a new development or phase
thereof, all Concurrency requirements are met and no level of service set by a
relevant jurisdiction will be degraded below its standard or before its budgeted
timetable for improvement.
\iTW:::'
\';(,",
f;
i'l
(: "
}h
rj'
,("j
H:"
,'.:'
:~~~
k:
Policy 1: Determination shall be made that the traffic generated by non-
Residential development can be accommodated both on-site and off-site,
I~
Policy 1 a: The criteria established in the Transportation Concurrency
Ordinance being drawn up at present shall guide the City's decision that
a development mayor may not be permitted.
~~::h'
It
::'\
',",",
?;lJ
i...
GO:
.H"
{\j
Policy 1 b: Standards to be included in revised land development
regulations will be applied to new development to provide internal traffic
circulation, adequate parking, pathways, access to adjacent property if
appropriate, and control of access to major roads,
('[1
]I
"'J
U,',
'I:,
.\
Policy 2: All non-residential projects shall be landscaped according to standards
to be drawn up relating quantity of green area to intensity of activity and
including xeriscaped areas,
'l'
I..:
~.- ,~
\)'i,
' "
I'
"
I ':,'~'
"
"
I.':':'
':]
.....:J
Morse Foundation Tract
Page -12-
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
,':,)
1,\
1-1
I
r
I I
., \
Policy 3: Adherence to regulations on sign age, lighting, and outdoor display and
storage will be determined,
,-;;~
,'J
iJ
-.-..1.
. ..'
1.<
!g
d
~l
;~l
~
,"'1
'.J
}
'J
IJ
j
Policy 4: Review by any applicable citizen board of business owners' association
with respect to architectural control or community appearance standards adopted
by the City shall be concluded,
Policy 5: Provision shall be made for proper solid waste storage and collection,
Policy 6: Plans for potable water and sanitary sewer service will have been
reviewed and approved by the City, as well as for stormwater management and
for irrigation through reuse of wastewater effluent.
Comment: Development of the subject property will comply with all applicable City
regulations.
2,} 0 Infrastructure
2,} O,} Roads: The subject property is accessed off SR 434 which recently been
improved as a 4-lane divided arterial highway, The SR 434 improvements,
combined with the GreeneWay and the Interchange with SR 434, provide
adequate capacity to accommodate development of the property.
2,}O,2 Wastewater: Service to accommodate development of the property is
available along SR 434 with adequate service capacity to accommodate
development.
:"'~
.j
J
'1
...l
2,10,3 Water: Water service is available along SR 434 with adequate capacity to
serve the project.
Morse Foundation Tract
Page -13-
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
, I
..J
\
-1
2,11 Wetlands
. I
.I
J
'J
The subject property contains some wetland areas as identified in the environmental
assessment prepared by Lotspeich & Associates, dated March 30, 1999 (see Exhibit
III). The site analysis is limited to an inventory of potential site wetlands, The limit
of the wetlands has not been configured by the St. John River Water Management
District or the US Army Corp of Engineers,
:1
\ .
.1
Development of the subject property will take into. account the site conditions, the
character of the wetlands, proposed development and the alternative of on-site or off-
site mitigation as appropriate and permitted by the St. Johns River Water Management
District and the US Army Corp of Engineers.
2,12 Soils
. "
.1
:::;,t
The on-site soils, as identified by the Soils & Conservation Service, are identified in
Exhibit I. These soils identify both suitable and unsuitable soil conditions, The
development application for the property will further evaluate the site soi Is and provide
guidance into the master site planning, Impacts in areas with unsuitable soils, if any,
will be addressed in the development process,
...,
'1;'-'..
i1I!
J
1
......)'
2,13 Flood Hazard Area
A portion of the subject property is located within the 1 OO-year flood hazard area (see
FEMA Flood Map Exhibit I), Development of the property will address this existing
condition and properly mitigate for any encroachments within the flood hazard areas.
The development plans and mitigation offlood impacts shall comply with the St. Johns
River Water Management District criteria,
\
j
: I
,"
]
.]
'.,1
IJ
iJ
Morse Foundation Tract
Page -14-
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
I
I I
I
2.14 East Central Florida Regional Planning Council Regional Plan and State
Comprehensive Land Use Plan
The application to amend the Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan is consistent with
both the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council Regional Plan and the State
Comprehensive Land Use Plan.
\-1
i )
I I
J
I]
1'-1
j
I
I:)
~
IJ
I
]
1
I
}
J
I
Page -15-
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Morse Foundation Tract
I
J
, !
I
J
--1
'J
]
]
]
"]
J
tI
J
OJ
],
J
)
]
]
J
J
J
EXHIBITS
I
J
". '1
~:
"J
..)..
TI
~"'.
:"":
~~~
I.,'
:.:l
.."
TI.'.
;u
~
J
,,,..)
',;-"
)
~tJ
".1
..
"I
,.J
]
EXHIBIT I
MAP SERIES
J
..l -
LOCATION MAP
,. 'J
.1.'
~.. ,
1-1:
r
.>-
']
;J
01
i.J
'\~~
~~::
.1
:J
II
"J
h
:]
ill
a
AERIAL
't ,~,
~i~;~
.. ~. fJlFj
.:'~\~ ~:~;:.~
LEGEND
PUD - Planned Unit Development
\
R-U - Rural Urban .
1~A-ll A-l_O : Agriculture
,/:1 R U Kural Urban \
PLI - Public Lands and Institutions,
KM-l - Residential Mobile Dome
R- 1 - Residential Dome
.1
"'1
,.~,.
T1
ZONING MAP
\,
..
- "--'". _..__....._.--~:....._..."'......,_._,...:
.-"~.I.----.,# ~ ; ..~,~_ _~_
/.';/frrrTi"TTT1 -r:;-'!'-i ill
//""" ; Ll~-LL.LLL._.LjJ.,LLlJ..
// Il\
<~ ;;..' , ,
:n '~~<'Y::I'~R:j,. "1\~1 r~~~~=-
. ".'_'" /./', ,v / . . r ."j. .
". . ,..~---._...-.- '\ ')/.-<^Vl. L..:............~ ; ;,
, ><."" '. T...... .-...,..., 1'- "-
, (" Y,- "~'(,~"'~ '. :\11 '.~,-
..r \.Y"^'.......::..,/."" r-t: f....j r-',
.:, ]
...."..
pun
~ ." ."..-.-...-.....'
"1
..J
:]
W
.....1
. .
" c-]
".1..
J
']
J
]
J
:1
]
]
\
,
;...----.. -
K-U
'pun~
pun
:l...-4' .. '1-9~i4' .-.".%4..... ._- .
-..-. C'" T"4;I'1 r'-
'"
-.___.....~._.....--.l.,..
.~~~~~1~
. \./ .. <., 0_".' ',' .
/ !:-~',,:>......~.
\.."""<."..
'\. "
'"' ,
. I ,;),' ,
Y/,'-l t
Kg; f
).-../ '
f.-.J .
f-'" I
,. ~_.,~".j<~!~1 ;
,. ," >~h-(<.)')/ !
");> I i
-~7
.,. _~~-;____", f
.'
,,', ',.'
.~
,,- ..
~':~:~:.
/, '""
. ',' ,
~",<>;(-
/ .// ,,'
"J t
'-:.."
, ,.
,
~ ....1..
,
1.-"-. .-
1-....'. ,
"
A-I0
...,'
.,'
A-]
n[
-- I
FUTURE LAND USE
\ \MAP
\ \
\\
\
\
\
-'J
"
H.
..i~
LEGEND
mi' LDR. Low Dens!ty Residential
:h COMM . Commercial
Mixed Use
,,,..] R.} 0 . Residential Max. } 0 DUI A. C
~; PUBO. Public Other Govt. Owned
..~ CONS. Conservation
"."1
.,
MIXED
USE
RIO
:.(
/i:
~
UEI
.J CONS
3.:
W
LDR
]:1 --"'I
,.:i I
I
I
I
!
i
,
\
!
I
I I
~D
USE! iI
; )
f
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
\
~
\
~
~
,
"D'
"'. !
.' :
.t. ~
~...., ;
,
I
ill'.. !
" 1
., :
;t ;
I
,
,: ! .
:;'1 COMM
~\\
J
I
I
I
I
!
I
L_..____.____
'--
f I
CpMM [----1
. !
--'-~-1 t
! I
! I
" ; fT' f
LI-l--,-,-----J ,
_,J...J.LLLLl t_
o -'I;-DK,-r-! r
,. :' .!!!:
. ..
____-+_-;-......__3 '
! J-LLJ_LLL_! ~.
j' : i i ! : : \
-'00.1 I I JrL..
- ---- I -r--
, 1___1_____
I ! o! --1--.
I, . . , , "'1-"--
-- ( I ' . '. '---.L.
-i--.l-l-bDRr
f I ! 1 , J . :
.-=it:: - : . ! .
, t ' ! , l
I =~~ ! j ; J ; ! ;
,SOILS MAP
" -1 LEGEND
;, . 2 - Adamsville-Sparr fme sands
&: 4 - Astatula fine sand
6 - Astatula-Apopka fine sands
D 9 - Basinger and Delray fine sands
" . 10 - Basinger, Samsula, and "ontooo
.., 11 - Basinger and Smyrna fme sands
13 - EauGallie and Immokalee fine sands
J 19 - Manatee mucky fine sands
.,:. 20 - Myakka and EauGallie fme sand
27 - Pomello fine sand
29 - St. Johns and EauGallie fme sands
J1 31 - Tavares-Millhopper fme sands
W
\ \
\ \
\\
Tl
id
'''-'J'
'.
J
~
J
10
10
-~~--'---"!
.... .. ':~
..~~~~
tlld
F41----,~~
~ r---~
--- ~ ~I-T---+. ..,
( I I '!
,',~ 1 <)0 YEAR FLOOD, ZONE I
, r~ \, f
/-_..~---"-" I \ "- /~ f
I I I i --- \ I ;
'! Ii ~I' .----i
", 1'1. !
/\ d I j I!
I, ! ' I I ! i'l ! ~....
! i I I. ! ...'
! -r ), I___~-_-_-L--'-"--j r----.J /1 ~
!' 1'" I' I I I ~
.; i " ! II i I i J ! \
I 1___ ~-----) ! b'--__....----r--. l..!.-_._.J___.d ~ ", -'-. - -., - .. --.1:-=':
. :-1: -='-IT \ \ l I s~ KD 41G9--.'.....-4-. '.'% JoJ I ~ '-r----r-r,--l _--.r-----~!-
.:~ -~ \\ II I II, · : ~':If!UI 1 'i! j'"---r___, ~- ~._..........H__.;
:1 ~..,...,...,-lr. I ; I c...-.J n r-----'""--I.-- I I' Ii; \ . t--'.-..-.--'.....-
]--,]~l'!~ j I ) l---~-~II'JT-~J I ~'I\ ~ t_tI[~r
:".' I!" I / 1 I J' Ii) I i I f---J=:.-~----.-.-...l---ft--..-,-..----
:;:=4 i,l ~. .______1-\ r---7/i-~ C..;r...jl1~~1 i-- \ \ H++-H-t-
~ ~; L. I. i !~ ~/J / . . i-i 1---1-1 !....::..,.. i \ l iL--'-'--C....:__L.
,~~ ~';!U~r~/<::.//~'(vA.'n,.i7;gsRI I \ \ FJTu1
]J dbJJI. fTll1 \'d?) '\ V"^y),, :'\S;?:--- ~TIIIIIIu ! ~!! : Ej I i \\ \. ,.3 ~(--I~. ,---1. C.
.' (,"T"'1 ~\ \" \ '> ~ ,-~ ~\ \ ~ -- -- 'K..l.l..j ! A ,! ~ \ L.J .....l-.J L
1 !..lJ......J i JJ--L; f-.--, I' {I--./._~V (X / \ \..<..... , \ A..:yJ j, " I' 1\ \ I ! ; I!
- :l----+-L1--.. 'r' --:>.....&,.....;l1rli1i ~~'" "'I( ~..t~.....~~_.h ,/ '<..' ' / ,I i! I \ \ r:::~l ;"TTl r
'1'J'.' ;\__J :-!,-' i \1 'I; j," ~(: :flr/II,'!II rr~" ......... /1 Ii' I, I .:..L~.....
\r m' i i ! ! . I i I! -_-1,,"\--1.J.,UJ...L.:.LI.LJ.LL \ ~<<' 11 I i.! "'-T-+-\ \ ,='~'(~-fr~:
"... . \ / ~ "-. ~ I !, . .,' , . t-._>.-...,....,..~-.
"~!\\ ! I ! 1 i / ~-<::::'-_../ /~.../\ \j ! 7:-"r-"'f"'~- -=----.~J \ \ ~--~J---+'''-: \ \, -->LL....U..
._];)..."'~~~ ' I! '~.___. .' (\,~'~-/ </'~x~0-~~S:<'~;;:'~"J~~\ ._u_....L_-L..J,.-,....LJ-.-..=;'/. 'jI~..
;; )-t"-t-'--t- - \ ~ . . ~:':'7--"""'\ / /~ \ . "'f /fu~ '~'i>::::,7 /)-, '" I '; \ i :
. ' __~__:::...~ " "A--:..:::.:....~~_L....L.-}.- .__L..._-'-"'"'_-'".._""--_....._'--'--.._..____._____........._.:...__.,_.__.~___..._.......----...-...
:J
,1
(1~"..'
....~
Bi
~~
\-
,,-.....-...-...--, 1
\ i---~
1. . ,.A
:mt
jfu
~J
:1
..:1
"\,
','\
)
'1
~]
]
.J
]
"..
~J
" 'J
~
J
J
J
J
.j
.1
J
i
EXHIBIT II
GREENEW A Y INTERCHANGE DISTRICT
J
I
, ."1
..
';-]
, oJ
:.:..1
]
rlj".'
\.....'
"'..
..'l
~
J
,.}
-. ~:
,].
:\-.",'
t..~:
...."..1.
1J
.]
]
11
J
']
J
,]
GREENEW A Y INTERCHANGE ZONING DISTRICT
DIVISION 3.
DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS
Sec. 20-483
Purpose,
The GreeneWay Interchange District is designed as a mixed-use category which combines a strategy to attract
higher density residenlial and commercial enterprises oriented 10ward a major transportation nexus of an
expressway and arterial road and minimize urban sprawl. This dislrict is specifically designed to:
a. Provide high density residential development in close proximity to economic centers for employees.
b. Discourage urban sprawl by clustering economic development activities along growth corridors.
c. Promote business development in close proximity to the regional road network providing high visibility
and convenienl access.
d. Ensure sufficient availability of land to realize the economic development needs of the City.
e. Provide for choice and diversity in living arrangements and work environments.
See, 20-484
General Uses and Intensities,
(1) The GreeneWay Interchange Development District is designed to provide a variety ofland uses, development
intensities, and target industry development. The uses are:
a.' Planned commercial developments, corporate business parks, office complexes, commercial, service and
hotel uses,
b, Planned medium to high-density residenlial developments,
c. Planned mixed-use developmenls,
(2) Development Intensities:
The City shall apply the following development intensities. The criteria for establishing appropriate
. intensities include, but are not limited to, compatibility with surrounding existing and planned uses, adequacy
of existing and programmed City services and facilities, economic development objeclives, and consistency
with the City's Comprehensive Plan and site characteristics.
Residential Uses:
Medium Density 5-10 Dwelling Units per net acre
High Density 11-20 Dwelling Units per net acre
Non-Residential Uses:
1.0 Floor Area Ratio (FAR)
)
Adoptcd August 23, 1999
Grccncway Intcrchangc District
. I .
.'1
]
J
]
'..1
~
J
J
J
:;J
.J
, 1
]
J
.J
,J
(3) Land Use Mix:
The Greene Way Interchange District shall be developed to accommodate an overall mix of land uses as
described below:
Land Uses
Minimum
Maximum
Residential
Non- Residential
0%
75%
25%
100%
(4) Open SpacelRecreation:
. A minimum of twenly-five percenl (25%) of the overall site must be designated as recreation and common
open space. Individual land uses may have more or less than twenty-five percent (25%) of its area devoted to
common open space.
Recreation areas are nol required withi~ non-residential areas. In non-residential areas, landscaped pedestrian
connections between buildings, parking and adjacent development is required.
Sec. 20-485
Permitted Uses, Conditional Uses, Accessory Uses & Structures, Prohibited Uses.
(1) Medium Density Residential:
)
Single- Family AttachedlDetached
Patio Homes
Duplex
Multi-Family
(2) High Density Residential:
(3) Office:
Variety of office uses from single-tenant professional offices to corporate office parks.
(4) Commercial:
)
Alterations and tailoring
Automotive accessory sales
Bed and Breakfast inn
Bicycles sales and service
Bookstores, newstands
Cleaners
Communi~, Regional and Sub-Regional Shopping Centers
Computers, hardware, sofIware sales and service
Convention center
Convenience store without gas pumps
Daycare Nurseries
Drug store
Electronic equipmenl sales and service
Financial institutions
Florist
Government service facilities
Adopted August 23, 1999
- 2 -
Grceneway Interchange District
)
,.1
-1
.. )
, .1
.]
]
.1
~
-8
J )
}
~J
J
1
']
J
I
..J
J
Hardware store
HOlCI, motel
Mcdical clinics
Mcdicallaboralorics
Mcdical supplies and rentals
Ncighborhood Conveniencc Stores
Offices - (general)
Offices - (regulated professions)
Parking garages
Parks and recrealion facilities
Personal services
Physical fitness and health clubs
Private clubs and lodges
Public utilities and service structures
Residential - multifamily
Restaurants
Sidewalk cafes
Theaters
(5) Conditional Uses in Commercial Areas:
Before a conditional use may be granted within the GreeneWay Interchange District, the Development
Review Committee must find that the use or uses are consistent with Ihe general purpose and spirit of the
districl and wilh the public interest.
Alcoholic beverage sales (package)
Alcoholic beverage sales (on-premises consumption)
Amusement enterprises
Automobile and truck rental
Automobile Gasoline Service Station
Automobile repair
Child care facilities
Drive-in restaurants
Hospitals
Mini-warehouses
Nursing Homes (senior independent living)
Schools (public or private)
Any other retail store or business enterprise not listed that in the judgement of the Development Review
Committee is consistent with those included above, and further, Ihat will be in harmony with the purpose and
spirit of the GreencWay Interchange District.
(6) Permitted accessory uses and structures,
. Accessory uses customarily associated with, dependent on, and incidental to the permitted prinCipal uses.
(7) Prohibited Uscs,
)
Check cashing establishmcnts (other than banks)
FIca markets
Funeral homcs
Pawn Shops
Adoptcd August 23, 1999
Grceneway Interchange District
- 3 -
Strip centers
.. J
,.
,.
All uses listed in Sec, 20-252 in the C-2 General Commercial and Industrial District of Ihe Cily Code,
except 20-252(1) uses permilled in the C-1 "Neighborhood Commercial District"
~
DIVISION 4.
GENERAL DESIGN STANDARDS
"]
Sec, 20-486
Building Height.
~J No building shall exceed seventy-five (75) feet in height.
Sec~ 20-487
Setbacks,
I1
~jJ
fl."
11
(1) No improvement shall be located on any property closer to any property line than the minimum setbacks set
forth below:
]
S.R. 434
Collector Street
Internal Street
Side (a)
Rear (a)
Buildings
25 feet
25 feet
15 feet
o feet
10 feet
Parking
15 feet
15 feet
10 feet
5 feet
5 feet
.~
(a) Unless abutting a residential area. See Section 20-491.
J','
..
(2) The narrowest dimension of a lot adjoining a road right-of-way shall delermine its front for the purpose of
establishing yard requirements.
~'l
j
(3) On corner lots, the front yard shall be considered as abutting the street upon which Ihe lot has its least
dimension. The rear lot, in this case, shall be opposite the front yard.
}
dJ
']
.J
(4) The following structures are specifically excluded from the setback restrictions:
a. Steps and walks,
b. Landscaping and landscape benns.
}.
'~I
c. Planters three (3) feet in height or Jess, or
J
d. Other improvements as may be permitted under applicable regulations of the City.
}l
j
The Board of Adjustment will consider any request for the placement of such other improvements within a
selback, only after a Development Review Committee review and recommendalion. In determining whether
to recommend City consent, the Development Review Committee may consider, without limiting the scope of
their review, the following: (1) the extent to which any hardship exists that would justify a variance from the
normal setback requirements; (ii) the aesthetics of the proposed improvements and their visibility from
common roads and adjacent properties; (iii) the consent or objections of adjacent property owners; and (iv)
the nature and use of the proposed improvements. It is the owner's burden and responsibilily 10 provide such
information and documentation as may be requested by the Development Review Commillee in order to
:;1
J
JJ
Adopted August 23, 1999
- 4-
Grceneway Interchange District
J
J
]
'1
I
:,J
\.')
L:<
''-1
~?
~.:
,. ]
,.
'~
!-:f;
'J )
J
'J
~{\
J
,.:1
.J
J
J
1
justify to the Development Review Commiuee that the intrusion of additional improvements within the
normal setbacks is beneficial to the corridor and will not adversely affect adjacent properly owners,
See, 20-488
Land Coverage,
The overall site shall contain 25% open space or recreation. Individual sites within a planned development may
have more or less than 25% open space. Stand alone single commercial or office sites may contain a minimum of
15% open space.
Open space includes pervious surfaces, landscaped or natural areas, recreation areas and stormwater
retention/detention areas. Open space does not include designated conservation areas.
Sec,20-489
Off-Street Parking and Driveway Requirements, ,
(1) Paved Driveway and Parking Spaces: All driveways and parking spaces shall be paved with asphaltic
concrete and/or concrete and shall be curbed.
(2) On-Site Parking: All parking areas shall be on-site and shall be adequate to serve all employees, visitors and
company vehicles.
(3) Rights-Of-Way: Parking is prohibited on rights-of-way or along driveways.
(4) Parking Space Size: Each off-slreet parking space shall be a minimum of two hundred (200) square feet, 10' x
20', in addition to space for access drives and aisles. The minimum width of each space shall be ten (10) feet.
The two (2) foot area of paving at the end of each parking space may be omitted provided the area is
landscaped with sod or another acceptable ground cover. The two (2) foot landscaped area shall not be
counted toward any other greenspace requirement or selback. Lines demarcating parking spaces may be
drawn at various angles in relation to curbs or aisles, so long as the parking spaces so created contain within
them the rectangular area required.
(5) Handicapped Spaces: Handicapped spaces shall be provided and sized in accordance with 316.1955,
316.1956,316.1958,320,0843,320.0845,320,0848 Florida Statutes.
(6) Access drive Width: Each access drive shall have a minimum width of twenty-four (24) feet.
(7) Number of Access Drives: If a site has less than two hundred (200) feet of frontage on a right-of-way, one (1)
access drive shall be permitted unless there is a joint access drive, in which case two (2) may be permitted. If
a site has more than two hundred (200) feet of frontage on a right-of-way, F.D.O.T permit guidelines (found
in 1496-7 Florida Administrative Code) and restrictions shall apply.
(8) Turning Radius: The minimum turning radius shall be thirty (30) feet.
(9) Coordinated jgint use of parking areas during off -peak hours shall be encouraged to be incorporated into the
design of projects to reduce the total number of required parking spaces,
(10) Whenever practical, vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems shall be separated. A system of
multi-purpose walkways connecting buildings, common open spaces, recreation areas, community facilities
and parking areas shall be provided and adequately lighted for nighttime use. The intenl is to create a
pedestrian oriented system 10 connect all properties within the Greeneway Interchange District
Adopted August 23, 1999
Grceneway Interchange District
- 5 -
j '~
I
./
\:..1
r-:u'
r'C<
~"1'
~;: J
!'J
I.:'"
~.
~."'..'.
+~~:
.,'
~_.,,,:
".....1
,('
""~. ~
(..1,..
~-
"J"
':"."
,
.:;,.,
":'}
':: ~
;
~. "
~~~,J,
D
lliJ
']......:
'liJ
i~.
",'~
Ii:,;
;':1'
'3
T.'::l
11
:;iJ )
tl
j
.J
Sec. 20-490
Landscaping.
The following landscape standards establish the minimum criteria for the development of Ihe roadways, parking
areas, and other features 10 ensure continuity in aeslhetic values throughout the corridor.
(1) AJl areas requiring landscaping shall meet or exceed the following general landscape requirements. Such
Landscaping Requirements are required for:
a. That part of the site fronting a public or private right-of-way that is within the designated corridor.
b. Around and within all off-street parking, loading and other vehicular use areas within each site. Loading
areas shall be screened with the intent to block the view of such loading areas from public streets or
adjacent properties to the greatest extent practicable. Loading areas shall not front on public streets.
c. AJong the outside of screening walls and fences.
d. Adjacent to buildings on the site to complement the architectural style.
(2) AJllandscaping shall be installed according to accepted commercial planting procedures. Fertile soil, free of
lime rock, pebbles or other construction debris shall be used in all planting pits.
(3) The owner of a site shall be responsible for all landscaping so as to present a neat, healthy and orderly
appearance free of refuse and debris. Any dead or dying pIa nt material, including sod, shall be promptly
replaced or shall be treated to restore healthy growth to achieve a uniform appearance.
(4) AJllandscape areas shall be adequalely irrigated, with reclaimed water if available, based on the following
criteria:
a, An automatic sprinkler irrigation system shall be provided for all landscaped areas.
b, The irrigation system shall be designed to provide full coverage of all landscaped areas and shall be
equipped with rain sensors,
c. The irrigation system shall be designed and operated to prevent or minimize run-off of irrigation water
onto roadways, driveways, and adjacent properties not under the control of the owner of the site.
d. The irrigation system shall be maintained so as to be in optimum working order at all times,
(5) AJl plant material shall meet or exceed standards for Florida No.1 plants, as specified in Grades and
Standards for Nursery Plants, Paris I and II. 1973, published by Ihe State of Florida, Department of
Agriculture ancL.Consumer Services, Trees shall be selected from the Recommended Tree Pallet found at the
end of these design slandards,
(6) The preservation and utilization of a site's naturallrees and shrubbery is strongly encouraged, Existing
vegetation shall be incorporated into the landscape concept for a site wherever practical.
(7) Natural growth may be used to satisfy specific landscape requirements, Relocation of onsile landscaping
material is encouraged,
Adopted August 23, 1999
Grceneway Interchange District
- 6 -
J
l
'J
j
,j
..
'j
1'.'
, ,
]
~
~:l~
] )
.1
'J
.'
'. ..:
J
, ',}
)
J
']
..J
J
(8) When an accessway intersects a right-of-way, landscaping may be used to define the intersection provided
however that all landscaping within Ihe triangular area described below shall provide unobstructed
cross-visibilily at a level between two (2) feet and six (6) feel above finished grade. Pedestrian sidewalks may
cross the triangular area. Landscaping, except grass and ground cover, shall not be located closer than three
(3) feel from the edge of any accessway pavement. The triangular area shall be defined as:
a. The areas of the site on both sides of an accessway which lie within a triangle formed by the intersection of
each curb of the accessway with the streel right-of-way with two (2) sides of each triangle being ten (10)
feet in length from the point of intersection and the third side being a line connecting the ends of the two
(2) other sides.
b. The area of the site located at a comer formed by the intersection of two (2) or more streets with two (2)
sides of the triangular area being measured thirty (30) feet in length along the right-of-way lines from
their point of intersection; and the third being a line connecting the ends of the other two (2) lines.
(9) All landscape plans and specifications shall be prepared by a landscape architect licensed to praclice in the
State of Florida.
(lO)AlI parking areas and vehicular use areas shall be screened from the public right-of-way by a landscape
screen, This screen may be composed of a berm not less than three (3) feel in height and not more than five
(5) feet in heighl or a maintenance free wall at least (3) feet in height, or a screen of landscaping at leas t three
(3) feet in height twelve (12) months after plan ling. If a wall or hedge is used, a meandering berm a
minimum of one and one-half (1 V2) feet in height, with a maximum slope of 3:1 shall be required. Berms
shall not be used where coverage conflicts with existing vegetation. This screening requirement may be
combined wilh other requirements within the landscape easement. Berm slopes shall vary in order to provide
visual interest; however, the maximum slope shall be 3:1. The berm shall be completely covered with grass or
other living landscape materials. A berm shall not be constructed around existing vegetation where the grade
will be raised more than six (6) inches. Walls and shrub screens shall be setback a minimum of ten (10) feet
from the property line,
NOTE: For the purpose of this ordinance hedge, screen and landscaping are to be used interchangeably.
(11) Concrete walkways shall be a minimum five (5) feet wide and shall be encouraged to meander, where
appropriate, to create visual interest. The construction of the walkways shall be coordinated with adjacent
properties to ensure continuity of design. Where a sidewalk intersects a street or driveway, a curb ramp shall
be installed,
(12)Landscaping shall be installed to screen parking areas from adjacent and proximate properties as follows:
a, Where vebicular use areas are adjacent to properties assigned a zoning classification which allows only
residential uses or properties assigned a residential land use designation, the provisions of Section
20-491 active/passive buffer and setback design standards shall apply,
)
b. A hedge or other durable landscape screen at least thirty (30) inches in overall height above grade when
planted, to grow to thirty-six (36) inches within twelve (12) months under normal growing conditions,
shall be used between the common property lines, When two (2) hedges occur along a common property
line, use of the same plant species is required. If a hedge exists on an adjacent property along a common
Adopted August.23, 1999
Greencway I ntcrchangc District
- 7 -
r
.:....{
~t..
propcrty line, a duplicate hedge is not required; however, in all cases, tree planting requircments for each
properly shall apply,
TI
IJ
c. Live screening material shall bc plantcd in arcas not less than five (5) fect in width. Planting areas shall
be mulched a minimum of two (2) inches thick with cypress mulching or other organic mulch.
""1
<.
; ~\.
.J::
d. At least one tree shall occur for every seventy-five (75) linear feet, or fraction thereof, along side
(non-street side) and rear property lines, These trees shall be any canopy trees selected from the
recommended plant pallet found at the end of this seclion,
r::"j
;f
~:;:;
(13)Landscaping shall be provided for all vehicular use areas so as 10 provide visual and climatic relief from
broad expanses of pavement and to channelize and define logical areas for pedestrian and vehicu lar
circulation. The requirements for landscaping in vehicular use areas are as follows:
I.~:~:~
l:~:';'
\.'\
'i\:\
'.'\:'.
, .
m:H
. .;~
;1ii
a. Parking areas shall include landscaped curbed islands at the ends of each row of parking. These islands
shall be a minimum of ten (10) feet wide and as deep as the combined parking space(s) plus median, if
any and shall include at least one (1) canopy tree.
ml
1~}J
b. Each parking bay shall have no more than ten (10) continuous parking spaces unbroken by a landscape
island, Shade trees shall be pr~vided.
'i'
I..~.'
0'
c. Parking bays shall have a maximum of forty (40) spaces. Where total parking requirements for a
parcel exceed forty (40) cars, parking lots shall be broken into distinct areas separated by continuous
landscaped islands at least five (5) feet wide. Landscaped islands shall contain one (1) tree for every
thirty (30) linear feet of island,
;1'"
{~':.
,;W
d. Each separate required landscaped island shall contain a minimum of one hundred sixty-two (162)
square feet with a minimum interior dimension of nine (9) feel and shall include at least one (1) tree.
"OJ
l":$~
.r
~;r
e. As an option, a six (6) foot wide landscaped island may be constructed between rows of parking which
shall count towards the required open space, If Ihis option is used, the parking spaces abutting the
island may be shortened to nineteen (19) feet in length and Ihe unbroken rows of parking may be
extended to twenty (20) spaces. The landscaped island shall contain one lree for every thirty (30) linear
feet of island.
~...
.;~
i~'
h~
'11 (14) A landscaped unpaved area shall surround each non-residential building, occurring between the facade of
',.illJ the building and paved areas whether a parking area, drive or sidewalk as described below.
',;il
3>-:
a. Along the front and side of a non-residential building a minimum landscaped area of ten (10) feet for
the first floor plus three (3) feet for each additional floor shall be maintained, Sidewalks are not
considered part of the landscaped area.
:J
b. Along the rear of a non-residential building a minimum of five ( 5 ) feet of landscaped area shall be
maintained. Loading areas may be permitted along the rear or side facade of a building.
11,"
'B
c. For relail buildings, paving may be allowed up to thc fa<;ade of a continuous storefront building if
landscaping is provided inlermittently along the fac;ade of the building consistent with the following:
:.:1;1 )
'j
1, A minimum of fifty (50) percent of the front or side with continuous storefront must be landscaped,
2, Each landscapcd arca must have a minimum width of threc (3) fect.
Adopted August 23, 1999
. 8 -
Greeneway Interchange District
J'
',.
;;;'
J
'~-'l
I:.
:'] .
.,1
:]
"'1
I......
1';~'~
, I
~
].
.'
Of
'"'>'
,'1
..J
J
'.,1
'.
J
J
!
J
.J
(15) Foundation and accenl planting shall be provided around all structures for the purpose of enhancing an d
complementing the architectural c~aracter of the structure,
(16) Wel retenlion/detention ponds along S,R, 434 shall be designed so as not to require fencing. Wet
retention/detention ponds in the rear of buildings shall be fenced if required by slope. No dry
relention/delention pond shall be located along S,R, 434.
(17) All stormwater management areas shall conform to the design criteria promulgated by the City of Winter
Springs and the St. Johns River Water Management District. \
(18) A tree survey shall be submitted with any application for site plan review showing all trees over four (4)
inches in caliper consistent with Chapter 5 of the City of Winter Springs Code of Ordinances. Prior to any
site clearing activities all existing trees required to remain by the Development Review Committee shall be
tagged in the field for inspection and approval. Barriers shall be erected at the dripline of trees for
protection against construction activities.
(19) Any existing tree(s) indicated to remain on construction plans approved by the Development Review
Committee that are damaged or removed shall be replaced with new tree(s) Consistent with Chapter 5;
Section 5,5 of the City of Winter Springs Code of Ordinances.
(20) All areas not otherwise landscaped, including the 'right-of-way, shall be sodded with St. Augustine solid sod
by parcel owners, Other suitable sod may be permitted in low visibility areas or areas subject to periodic
water inundation.
(21) Pedestrian access through the perimeter wall and buffer may be provided at the abutting resident's or
homeowners association's option to provide convenient pedestrian access to non-residential uses such as
commercial areas, office parks or schools.
(22) Additional green space and landscaping shall be required at access drives.
See, 20-491
Buffers and Walls,
(1) Unless otherwise specified, the following active/passive design standards shall apply to all commercial,
office, and multi-family development adjacent to properties assigned a residential zoning classification or a
residential land use designation, Buffers and setbacks required by this section are intended to separate
incompatible land uses and eliminate or minimize adverse impacts such as light, noise, glare and building
mass on adjacent residential uses, The Development Review Committee shall make the final determination
of active and passive edge (s) during the site plan review process.
(2) Fronl setbacks shall comply with the requiremenls of Section 20-87. Side and rear setbacks shall comply
with Table 1 of Ihis Section,
(3) Passive buff(,';rs: The use of passive buffers may occur only on the passive edges of a building site, In using
passive buffers, the following requirements shall be met:
a, Buffer Width: Minimum fifteen feet (IS')
b, Buffers shall contain a perimeter brick or masonry wall six feet (6') in height.
)
Adopted August 23, 1999
- 9 -
Greeneway Interchange District
)
./
:,]
'-1
"4:'(
1...1
i'l
~\}tl
i]
~
ill
"'j:
,.
;~ .
.~
']
...}.
,..
,7J
ill
:]
. .t
I
.. .
,"
.:J
n..
jj
i:1
.,
......
i).rrl
11
');1.'
'D
c. Buffers shall contain four (4) canopy trees a minimum of two and one hall' inches (2,5") in diameter
(dbh) for everyone hundred (100) linear feet of buffer. Trees may be clustered or planted at regula r
intervals. '
(4) Active buffers: In using active buffers, the following requirements shall be met:
a, Buffer Width: Minimum twenty-five feet (25') for one-story buildings,
Minimum fifty feet (50') for buildings two (2) story and over.
b, Buffers shall contain a perimeter brick or masonry wall six feet (6') in height.
c, Buffers shall contain eighl (8) canopy trees a minimum of two and one half inches (2.5") in diameter
(dbh) for every one hundred (lOO)linear feet of buffer. Trees may be clustered or plante d at regular
intervals.
(5) The following table prescribes the landscape buffer and setback requirements relating to the height of
buildings when the following uses are adjacent to existing residential land uses and/or properties assigned a
residential zoning land use classification or land use designation.
Table 1
Passive/ AClive
Landscape Buffer and Side and Rear Setback Requirements
. )
Building Height
and Use
Passive Side of Building
Buffer Setback
Active Side of Building
ButTer Setback
One Story
Office
Commercial
Multi-Family
2 or more stories
Office
Commercial
Mul1i-Family
a. On internal streels, no existing or dedicated public or private right-of-way shall be included in
calculation of the buffer widths,
b. Existing vegetation shall be used where possible to meet these requirements,
(6) Walls: All freestanding walls, sound barriers, ground sign enclosures, planters, man -made structures
fronling along the designated roadway or its major intersections shall be of brick decorative or split-faced
concrete block. When these materials arc used for a visual screen, they shall conform to the architectural
style, materials, and color of the development.
Adopted August 23, 1999
Greeneway Interchange District
- 10 -
.I
:l
_-I
.f
.J
Cl
.~
J
-. t
~.
J
1
J
J
J
J
i
_J
J
Sec. 20-492
Signs.
All signs and sign clements, including shape, form, lighting, materials, size, color and location shall be subject 10
approval by the Development Review Commillee if such signs or sign clements are visible from adjacent
properties or a street right-of-way. .
(1) Ground Mounled Mul1i-Tenanl or Project Identification Sign: For each multi-tenanl development under
separate ownership, one (1) wide-based monument style permanent sign with landscaped base identifying the
name of the development and businesses within the development shall be permitted. For developments with
five hundred (500) feel of frontage or more on a major road, one (1) additional sign may be permitted. The
minimum separation for all signs on an individual ownership parcel shall be 200'.
a. Shall only adverlise the name of the commercial development companies, corporation or major
enterprises within the commercial development. The primary address of the building shall be
incorporated into the sign with numerals/letters a minimum of eight (8) inches in height, but the address
shall not be counted against allowable copy area.
b. Shall be located no closer than fifteen (15) feet from S.R. 434 right-of-way and ten (10) feet from internal
streets and side and rear setbacks if setbacks are not adjacent to S.R. 434.
c, Shall have a maximum of two (2) faces.
d. Shall be consistent in design, format and materials with the architecture of the proposed building(s).
e. A wall sign shall not be higher than eight (8) feet above the closest vehicular use area.
f. Signs shall be in an enclosed base a minimum width of two-thirds (2/3) the width of the sign.
Landscaping shall be incorporated around the base to include low growing shrubs and groundcover
and/or annuals to promote color.
g, Signs shall be in accordance with the following schedule:
Fronting on S,R, 434 the following shall apply:
Building Size (Gross Floor Area)
Under 75,000 square feet
75,000 - 250,000 square feet
over 250,000 square feet
Maximum Height
12 feet
14 feet
16 feet
Maximum Copy Area
32 square feet
48 square feet
64 square feet
Fronting on internal streets the following shall apply:
Building Size (Gross Floor Area)
Under 75,000 square feet
75,000 - 250,000 ~9uare feet
over 250,000 square feet
Maximum Height
14 feet
14 feet
16 feet
Maximum Copy Area
56 square feet
84 square feet
150 square feet
h, Multi-tenant centers are permilled additional signs for anchor tenants according to the
following schedule:
)
Adopted August 23, 1999
Grccncway Intcrchangc District
- 11 -
\. I
I
\:q
:: ~
"i. (2)
:...:.1
H
.ill
II}
,. ~.
i]
'~
'.'
J )
".J
--'.
'J
I','
:~
I
-J
'J
J
J
.:-l )
J
J
Building Size (Gross Floor Area)
Under 75,000 square feet
75,000 -:- 250,000 square feet
over 250,000 square feet
Anchor Tennnt Additional Signs
2 of 12 square feet
3 of 12 square feet
4 of 12 square feet
NOTE: An anchor tenant is defined as Ihe major retail slore(s) or office tenant in a center that is in
excess of 100' front feet and a minimum area of 10,000 square feel.
Ground Mounled Single-Tenant Identification Sign: One (1) wide-based monument style, permanent project
identification sign shall be permitted per single-tenant parcel. One additional permanent wide-based
monument style project identification sign may be permitted for parcels in excess of one (1) acre with more
than one (1) ingress/egress serving more than one (1) building. The minimum separation for all signs on an
. individual ownership parcel shall be 200'.
a. ,Shall only advertise one (1) person, firm, company, corporation or major enterprise occupying the
. .
premIses.
b. Shall be located no closer than fifteen (15) feet from S.R. 434 right-of-way and ten (10) feet from internal
streets and side and rear setbacks if setbacks are not adjacent to S.R, 434,
c. Shall not exceed two (2) faces.
d. Sign copy area shall not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet per face for signs fronting on S .R. 434 and
forty-eight (48) square feet for signs on internal streets, For parcels in excess of 4,0 acres, the project
identification sign face fronting S.R. 434 may be increased to forty-eight (48) square feet.
e. Shall be consistent in design, format and materials with the architeclure of the proposed building.
f. When fronting on S.R. 434 the sign shall not be more than eight (8) feet in height above the closest
driveway or vehicular use area,Internal signs shall not be more than twelve (12) feet in height above the
closest driveway or vehicular use area,
g, Signs shall be in an enclosed base that is at a minimum the full width of the sign, Landscaping shall be
incorporated around the base to include low growing shrubs and groundcover and/or annuals to promote
color.
h. A matching entry sign may be placed on either side of the primary entrance to a development if enhanced
landscaping at the entrance is provided,
(3) Building Mounted Multi-Tenant Identification Sign for Buildings with Separate Exterior Tenant Entrances: In
addition 10 the ground mounted identification sign, tenant signs shall be permitted on the exterior walls of the
building at a location near the principal tenant entrance, and be consistent with the following criteria:
a, Shall only advertise one (1) person, firm, company, corporation or major enterprise
occupying the premises,
b, The sign(s) shall be clearly integrated with the architecture of the building. Shall be consislent in design,
format, and materials with the architecture of the proposed building,
c, The sign(s) shall not project above any roof, canopy elevations, or top of parapet wall.
Adopted August 23, 1999
Grceneway Intcrchangc District
- 12 -
..1
i
..~
~..1
;;1
. "1
- ]
..,1
.]
.1iill......
.;:r~
]
~
J
J
}
,,;1
]-:
"
J
]
j::.
.,
""
J
':1
~J
J
d. Wall signs shall display only one (1) surface and shall not be mounted more than six (6) inches from any
wall.
e, When more than one (1) tenant sign is used on one (1) building, each tenant sign shall be consistent in
size, materials, and placement. .
f. The maximum size of sign letters and logos, including any sign backgrounds, shall be 24" in height for
individual tenanls other than anchor tenants. The maximum of letters and logos for anchor tenants in a
retail center shall not exceed 25% of the building height. An anchor tenant is defined as the major retail
store(s) or office tenant in a center that is in excess of one hundred (100') front feet and a minim urn area
of 10,000 square feet. .
. g. The length of the sign may occupy up to seventy (70%) percent of the linear feet of the storefront the
business occupies. The anchor tenant may have the signage permitted for a Building Mounted Single
Tenant Identification Sign.
h. For office buildings without separate exterior tenant entrances, one wall sign not exceeding two (2)
square feet shall be permitted identifying each individual tenant. The sign shall be located adjacent to the
building entrance.
(4) Building Mounted Single Tenant Identification Sign: In addition to the ground-mounted identification sign, a
building mounted identification sign may be permitted consistent with the following criteria:
a. Shall only advertise one (1) person, firm, company, corporation or major enterprise occupying the
premlses,
b. The identification sign is located on the exterior wall of a building.
c. The sign shall be clearly integrated with the architecture.
d. The sign shall not either project above any roof, canopy elevalions or top of parapet wall. The top of the
sign shall not be higher than fourteen (14) feet above the main entry floor with the exception of signature
buildings as described in these regulations,
e, The sign shall display only one (1) surface and shall not project more than six (6) inches from any wall.
f. Signs shall conform to the following schedule:
Building Size (Gross Floor Area)
Less than 50,000 square feet
50,000 to 100,000 square feet
Over 100,000 square feet
Maximum Copy Area
16 square feet
32 square feel
48 square feet
The maximum height of letters and logos shall be as follows:
Building Height
3 stories in height and under:
4 stories (signature building)
5 stories and up (signature building)
Max, Sign Size
Per max, copy area above
60 square feet
76 square feet
Letters
17"
19"
21"
Logos
22"
24"
26"
Adopted August 23, 1999
- 13 -
Greeneway Interchange District
I
:'j
J
'J
.1
]
('1
:j
'J
J
"]
")
~J
J
..,
J
J
J
For signature buildinl',s the following shall apply
(a) The overall size of the sign shall not exceed fjfteen (15) percent of a signable wall area to which the
sign is allached or the maximum allowable sign size, whichever is less. Signable wall area is defined
to be a continuous portion of a building unbroken by doors, windows, columns, trim or other
architectural details,
(b) If a sign consisls of a boxed display, the tOlal area of the display, including copy, logo and
background must be no greater than the maximum size allowances,
(c) If a sign consists of individual letters and a logo, the total area of the letters and logo, the negative
space in the letters and the spaces between Ihe letters, logo and words shall be included in
determining compliance with maximum size allowances.
(d) The sign shall not project above any roof, canopy elevation, or lOp of parapet wall..
(e) The sign shall be clearly integrated in design and materials with the architecture of the building. The
sign shall be carved into the fabric of the building or securely attached to it and mounted so as not to
project more than two (2) inches from the wall surface to which il is attached. The maximum
thickness of the sign shall be two (2) inches.
(t) The sign shall display the name of one (1) signature business and its identifying logo if applicable.
(5) Additional Signs/Variances: Under special circumstances, such as for parcels on comer lots, additional signs
consistent with these design standards may be approved, upon a request granted by the Board of Adjustment
pursuant to Sec. 20-82 and 20-83 or the City Code. The Board of Adjustment shall recommend variances of
this sign code in specific cases where such variances will not be contrary to the public interest and where,
owning to special conditions, a literal lranslation of this sign code would result in unnecessary hardship. All
requirements, procedures, findings and appeals of sign code variances shall follow those provisions for
, ,
zonmg vanances,
(6) Commercial Outdoor Advertising (i,e, Billboards)
)
Off-site advertising signs such as billboards are prohibited.
(7) Changeable Copy Signs: In order to create continuity throughout the corridor all changeable copy signs shall
be as follows:
a. The sign cabinet shall be all aluminum extrusion or better as approved by staff. Changeable copy signs
may be incorporated into permitted signs and shall be included as part of the permitted sign area as
described below:
I. Changeable copy signs shall not comprise more than twenty-five (25) percent of the permitted sign
area;
II. Movie theaters and other performance/entertainment facililies may utilize up to 80% of the
permitted sign area for display of films, plays or other performances currently showing. Such
copy area shall be included as part of the permitted sign area,
111. Movie theaters may use up to 80% of permitted wall sign area for display of names, films, plays
or'other performances currently showing,
IV, One changeable copy sign advertising the price of gasoline is permitted on gasoline station sites
provided it shall not exceed 12 square feel per sign face,
b, The sign face shall be acrylic Pan X 15 or Equal.
Adopted August 23, 1999
- 14 -
Greeneway Interchange District
c, The lellers and track shall be Wagner Zip-Change or Equal.
:] (8) Backlit Signs: Backlighting of signs, including awning signs, shall be permilled.
(9) Window Signs: Window signs may be permilled under special circumstances for retail establishments such as
signs inside and on a window or in a display of merchandise when incorporated with such a display. The 10tal
area of all window signs, shall not exceed twenty (20%) percent of the window glass area to be calculated
separately for each separate storefron1. Window signs shall count againsl total allowable copy area if they are
permanently attached,
]
-'J
"'ji
';.-.~ .
Jy
...
..,
,..
IV
\~~
l~;;
<><,',l
:: ~i
;i.{J
~,.
,.'
~.
'J"
:.::
"]
('(
~'"
....:
.. ',~
.'\."
~.
..,
.;'..
:'J'
v
]
J.:,
,"\,"
~~~
;;
:"1
~'"..
"
,:1.
"n
j
(10)Construction Signs: One (1) construction sign, denoting the owner, architect, landscape architect, engineer,
financial institution, contractors, or containing any statemenl pertaining to the project for which a building
permil has been obtained, will be permitted during construction. The construction sign shall not exceed
sixty-four (64) square feet in area and shall not exceed fourteen (14) feet in height or sixteen (16) in width.
The construction sign shall be removed from the site by the owner upon substantial completion of all
construction, or upon the issuance of a final Certificate of Occupancy, whichever is sooner. If the sign is not
removed when required, it may be ~emoved by the City at the owner's expense.
(ll)Marketing Signs (e.g, "Space for Rent" sign):
a. Only one (1) marketing sign shall be permitted on each parcel during the building's "leasing period". At
the end of the leasing period, marketing signage shall be removed from the site by the owner of the site.
b. All marketing signs shall be submitted to Ihe City for approval and location prior to the sign's
installation.
c, Marketing signs shall be set back a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet on S.R. 434 and fifteen (15) feet
from the front, side and rear prbperty lines. They shall not create a visibility obstruction to vehicular
traffic.
d. For parcels in excess of five (5) acres or with frontage on more than one (1) road, one (1) additional
marketing sign may be permitted. Signs must be a minimum of 200' apar1.
e. Marketing signs may be double faced. Sign faces shall be parallel and mounted on the same poles. The
copy area shall not exceed sixty-four (64) square feet and no more than ten (10) fee t in height. The total
of a single sign face shall not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet.
f. Marketing sign age may be incorporated within the construction signage, but the sign age shall not exceed
sixty four (64) square feet in area.
g. Marketing signs may be lighted so as to illuminate the lettering on the sign.
(12)Political Signs only by permi1.
(13)Prohibited Signs: The following signs and/or devices arc prohibited in the corridor.
a. Any sign or part of a sign which is designed, devised, or constructed so as 10 rotate, spin, gyrate, turn or
move in any animatcd fashion, Signs shall not incorporate reflective materials so as to crcate the
appearance of motion or neon.
b, Any sign painted directly on any exterior wall.
Adopted August 23, 1999
. 15 .
Grceneway Interchange District
.. .J
rl
..;.1
J
:.1
J
]
;;~;
\":
']
,.
~
J )
'..
J
]
. .~.
J
,]
]
J
J
J
J
c, Signs projecting more than six (6) inches in depth,
d, Roof signs,
e. Bench signs.
f. Snipe signs (e,g. signs attached t,o trees and poles),
g, Freestanding signs unless otherwise provided for herein.
h. Trailer signs.
. I. Signs attached to temporary structures.
J. Billboards
k. Any vehicle with a sign or signs attached thereto or placed thereon with three exceptions as follows: (a)
any vehicle when parked or slored within the confines of a building, or (b) any vehicle upon which is
placed a sign identifying a firm or its principal product if such vehicle is one which is operated during the
normal course of business and shall be parked in the least visible spot from the road, or (c) a trailer
placed on a job site during construction,
I. Pole signs,
m. Balloon signs.
n, Ribbon signs,
(14)Permanent Flags: Only project flags or governmental flags shall be permitted in conformance with the
following standards:
a. One (1) flagpole and one (1) flag may be permitted per parcels of two (2) acres or more.
b. The maximum width from top to bottom of any flag shall be 20% of the total distance of the flag pole.
c. Flagpoles shall maintain the same setback requirements as project identification signs.
. d. Flagpole heights shall be between twenty (20) and thirty-five (35) feet in height above grade.
e. A project flag shall only contain information permitted on the project identification sign. A project flag
shall be submitted to the Development Review Committee for approval.
(15)Temporary sig~~s for special events,
a, Permits for temporary signs, such as pennant and banner signs, not otherwise prohibited are allowed for
such purposes as auctions, special events, notice of opening of new businesses, and going out of business
sales, Permits for temporary signs shall aulhorize the erection of the signs and maintenance thereof for a
period not exceeding fourteen (14) days; and permits cannot be renewed on the same sign, nor shall
another temporary permit be issucd on the same location, within 90 days from the datc of expiration of
any previously issucd temporary permit.
Adopted August 23, 1999
- 16 -
Greeneway Interchange District
-l
'j
...1
J
9.....
:J
. 'J
J
J
'1
']
J
.. )
J
J
-'
b, Signs for specific events shall be removed within two (2) working days after conclusion of the event. A
freeslanding temporary sign shall be no larger than a maximum of thirty-two (32) square feet, and may be
double sided, Banner signs may be sized to extend across roads,
(16)Maintenance: All signs and associated apparatus shall be maintained by the owner of the site, Violations
shall be processed through the City's Code Enforcement Division.
(17)Nonconforming Signs,
a. Any sign, other than billboards, having an original cost in excess of one hundred ($100) dollars and which
is nonconforming as to permitted sign area or any other reason which would necessitate the complete
removal or total replacemenl of the sign, may be maintained a period of from one (1) to five (5) years
from the effective date of these design standards. The term of years. to be determined by the cost of the
sign or of renovation, including installation cost, shall be as follows:
Sign Cost or
Renovation Cost
Permitted Years from
Effective Date of Design Standards
$ 0 - $3,000
$ 3,001 - $ 10,000
Over $10,000
2
3
5
b, Violations shall be subject to Chapter 2, Arlicle 3. Division 2. Code Enforcement. City of Winter Springs
Code of Ordinances.
(18)Greeneway District Gateway Identification Sign:
One (1) architectural feature may be located adjacent to the Greeneway right-of-way within the northeast
quadrant of the District that identifies the overall Greenway Interchange developmenl consistent with the
following:
a, Maximum heighl of thirty-five (35) feet as measured above existing grade without a special exception
being granted by the City Commission,
b. Copy area can only identify the name of the overall development and the City of Winter Springs,
c. Consistent in design and materials with Ihe architecture of the overall development.
d. No part of the architectural feature may be designed, devised, or constructed so as to rotate, spin, gyrate,
turn or move in any animated fashion. The architectural feature shall not incorporate reflective materials
so as to create the appearance of motion,
e, In no way shall this archilectural feature resemble an outdoor advertising sign (billboard),
f, The words "Winter Springs" shall be incorporated into the sign,
Adopted August 23, 1999
Greeneway Interchange District
- 17-
.'1
-1
"]
.. :I
]
J
: I
J
J
1
]
J
]
J
.J
. ,
i
I
-.J
J
Sec. 20-493
Utility Lines.
All new or relocated utility lines within the district shall be constructed and installed benealh the surface of the
ground unless it is delermined by the Ci'ty that soil, topographical, or any other compelling conditions, make Ihe
underground inslallation of such utility lines as prescribed herein unreasonable and impracticable,
(1) It shall be the developer's responsibility on-site to make the necessary arrangement with each utility in
accordance with the utility's established policy.
(2) The underground inslallation of incidental appurtenances, such as transformer boxes, switch boxes, pedestal
mounted boxes for the provision of electricity shall not be required. However, such appurtenances where not
rendered impractical by the determinalion of the City shall be installed on the site of any development
approved after the adoption of this section. The necessary easements to allow the ulility company access and
service to such appurtenances shall, be dedicated 10 the service provider by the developer prior to issuance of
a building permit
(3) All transformers and switch boxes related to development approved after the adoption of this section shall be
set back a minimum of fifteen (15) feet from any right-of-way and visually screened using landscape
materials or masonry construction in conformance with these land development regulations.
Sec, 20-494
Cross-access Easements
(1) All development except single family residential and duplex uses, with parking lots or direct access to a
public road shall, as part of the development approval process, establish cross-access easements which
provide for the internal connection of the parcel to adjacent parcels unless the City Engineer makes a finding
that such joint-access is not feasible or practicable based upon circumslances unique to the properties.
(2) Shared parking areas shall be permitled a reduction in required parking spaces if peak demand periods for
proposed land uses do not occur at the same time.
Sec, 20-495
Building and Screening Design Guidelines
(1) Projects shall use materials consistent with materials used in the area. Acceptable malerials include stucco,
split-faced or decorative concrete block reinforced concrete with tile, and brick and terra coma accent
material. Inappropriate materials are river rock unfinished timber (unpainled), shake roofs, reflective/mirror
glass, and metal siding. Materials should be high quality and well crafted.
(2) Mechanical equipment and appurtenances, including but not limited to air condilioner units, ventilation
equipment, refrigeration systems, heating units, must be screened so thai they are not visible from any public
right-of-way. The screen shall consist of a solid wall, facade, parapet or other similar screening material
which is architecturally compatible and consislent with the associaled building, Such screening material shall
extend at least one (1) foot above the object to be screened. If landscaping is utilized, the plantings must be
high enough within one year of planting to provide a screen which will screen the entire unit with a minimum
of seventy-five (75%) percent opacily, In the case of satellite dishes, they shall be screened from view from
ground level of adjacenl rights-of-way and properties by buildings, dense landscaping or screen walls. The
Development Review Committee may permit dishes on buildings if no part of the dish is visible from the
ground of surrounding properties, Setbacks for antennas and satellite dishes shall be the same as the building
setbacks,
Adoptcd August 23, 1999
- ] 8 -
Grccncway Intcrchangc District
1
,'j
;.' ~l
-J
J
'~J
j
"]
~
~v
J )
:J
]
J
.,
]
nJ
J
(3) Dumpsters and similar facilities shall he screened on all four (4) sides from puhlic view, Both sides and the
rear of such facililies shall be screened by an opaque concrete wall, or similar ma terial. Dumpsters shall be
placed in an area Ihat is least visible from a public right-of-way,
(4) All storage areas shall be screened from view from the right-of-way and from adjacent residential zoning
districts. Screening enclosures may consist of any combinalion of landscaping and opaque building materials.
]f building materials are utilized, such material shall be consistent with the architectural design of the
principal structures.
(5) Side and rear elevations of buildings visible from a public street or adjacent property shall be designed in the
same architectural style as the main facade,
(6) All doors for service entrances or bays shall not face a public street unless they are screened to obscure
. service activities.
(7) Outparcels shall conform to the architectural, sign age, and landscape theme of the overall project and must
share an internal access with the overall project.
(8) Newspaper, magazine and other such vending machines, ATM's, pay telephones, and trash receptacles shall
be encased in a structure that is architecturally compatible and consistent with the adjacent building and other
site details and must meet building setbacks.
(9) Exterior lighting shall be a cut-off light source to protecl adjacent properties from glare. All exlerior lighting
shall be consistent and compatible throughout Ihe project.
(10) Buildings with mulIiple storefront entries are encouraged to incorporate overhangs in the design of front
facades as appropriate to promote pedestrian activity,
(11) Backflow preventers and other above ground valves shall be screened so they are not visible from the street
right-of-way using either landscaping or an opaque building malerial and shall be subject to buffer setback
requirements
(12) Drive-thru pick up windows shallnol be permitted on the front or sides of a building fronting on S.R. 434.
See, 20-496
Developer's Agreement
Any developer may propose to enter into a developer's agreement with the City designed to set forth terms and
conditions appropriate to meet the circumstances-of the specific proposed development. Such Development
Agreement shall be reviewed and approved by the City Commission, The City Commission may vary the
standards of this ordinance, including building or perimeter setbacks, parking standards, signage, and other
standards, If an increase in building height beyond fifty-five (55) feet is requested, the City Commission must
find the Fire Department capabilities are adequate to address the change, Such consideration shall be based on
building site constraints or physical characteristics of the property; provided specifically, however, Ihat any such
concessions for a constrained site shall only be considered by the City Commission in a Development Agreement
if enhanced perimeter landscaping or buffering is provided to assure that the objectives of this ordinance are
achieved,
)
Adopted August 23, 1999
- 19 -
Greeneway Interchange District
I
.I LARGE SHRUB
~l COMMON NAME
"] Cherry Laurel
Anise
Sweet Viburnum
'I Wax Leaf Ligustrum*
~.J Photinia *
, . Wax Myrtle
] MEDIUM SHRUB
COMMON NAME
~ Pittosporum
~} Variegated Pittosporum
Sandankwa Viburnum
Hetzii Juniper
~ Pfitzer Juniper
Shrub Holly
Silverthorn
J Azalea
Yew Podocarpus
I SMALL SHRUB
COMMON NAME
J DwarfYaupon Holly
Indian Hawthorn
J Dwarf Pittosporum
Evergreen Giant
Border Grass
1 Azalea
Thyrallis
Yew Podocarpus
] GROUNDCOVER
COMMON NAME
J Liriope Border Grass
Mondo Border Grass
.I Dwarf Confed. Jasmine
Parsonii Juniper
Dwarf Shore Juniper.
J African Lily
J
TABLE I
RECOMMENDED SHRUB PALLET
BOTANICAL NAME
MINIMUM HEIGHT REQUIRED
Prunus caroliniana
Illicium anisatum
Viburnum odoratissimum
Ligustrum japonicum
Photinia spp,
Myrica' cerifera
3D"
3D"
3D"
3D"
30"
30"
BOT ANlCAL NAME
MINIMUM HEIGHT REQUIRED
Pittosporum tobira 24"
Pittosporum tobira "Variegata" 24"
Viburnum Suspensum 24"
Juniperus chinensis vaL chinensis "Hetzii" 24"
Juniperus chinensis "Pfitzerana" 24"
Ilex spp. 24"
Elaeagmus pungens 24"
Rhododendron indica 24"
Podocarpus macrophyllus 24"
BOTANICAL NAME
MINIMUM HEIGHT REQUIRED
llex vomittoria "Nana" 18"
Raphiolepis indica 18"
Pittosporum tobira "Wheeleri" 18"
Liriope muscari "Evergreen Giant" 18"
Rhododendron indica 18"
Thyrallis glauca 18"
Podocarpus macrophyllus 18"
BOTANICAL NAME
MINIMUM HEIGHT REQUIRED
Liriope muscari 10 Pips/clump 9" O.c,
Ophiopogon japonicus 10 Pips/clump 9" o,c,
Trachelospernum jasminoides "Nana" 15" Spread 18" o.c,
Juniperus chinensis IS" Spread 18" O.c.
Juniperus conferta "Compacta" 12"-15" Spread 18" o,c,
Agapanthus africanus 10 Pips/clump 18" o,c,
1
)
.1
d
--J
:0.1
: ]
,;]
1(.:)
11
]
~
] )
<1
,J
J
.1
.J
J
)
\
,J
.\
..J
)
DayLily
Lantana
African Iris
Holly Fern
Hcmerocallis spp.
Lantana montevidcnsis
Dietes vegeta
Cyrtomium falcatum
English Ivy
Hedera hel ix
*Must be used with a row of lower growing shrubs in front.
10 Pips/clump 18" o,c,
15 "spread 18" O.c.
10 Pips/clump 18" o.c,
Gal. can 12"-15" spread 24" .
O.c.
4" pots - 2-3 plants/pot 12"
O.c.
Note: Plant list subject to administrative amendment from time to time,
2
I
1..1 .)
~']
".1
'j
,,1
J
1J:1.,..
11
'J
J
(S
T.')
iJ
':'}.
:\:
d
1J
'1
jJ
.,
'~~I
J
'11.';.
'jJ
.J
J
J
Crape Myrtle
Yaupon Holly
Chickasaw Plum
Flowering Dogwood
Redbud
Tabebuia
ACCENT PALMS
COMMON NAME
. Canary Island Date Palm
Washington Palm
Pindo Palm
Cabbage Palm
Lagerstoremia indica
Ilex vomitoria
Prunus anjustifolia
Cornus f10rida
Cercis canadensis
Tabebuia spp.
8'
8'
8'
8'
8'
8'
BOTANICAL NAME
HEIGHT
REQUIRED
Phoenix canariensis
Washingtonia robusta
Butia capitata
Sabal palm
5'
5'
5'
6'
Pruning of trees shall be allowed to maintain appropriate clearance for access and minor pruning
shall be allowed to promote healthy growth. The intent is to allow trees to achieve a natural tree
canopy,
Note: Plant list subject to administrative amendment from time to time,
)
)
4
-I
- I
J
- ~
.J
J
J
]
J
J
}
]
J
l
]
J
EXHIBIT III
ENVIRONMENT AL ASSESSMENT
I
J
OJ 1
"j'
',1\:
"\'
.,.
~:":'
:'il,'~l
.::~'
M:
";',"\
.,
,
~,
:::;]
'f
,'\,'
~~~;
~,..,
:\:.
Bi;
~.,
W
:':'U
~"f
\....
..'\
W
~~;
~"li"
.'1."
:...'
I'
ii!
J'
.-'~
'~.:
',}
;~~
ill
illI
j'
3~
.,
"'1'
"I
...
]
~"".
"
j.'
"
.']
:\cl
]
'J~:,
.'
I~ f . !.";
;~'.~:.: ~!
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Interested Parties
Michael J. Howe -1111 fI
DATE: 30 March 1999
L&A No. 98184.23
L&A Doc: \JMHD\98184C30.MEM
FROM:
PROJECT:
Lake Jessup Grove Property
SUBJECT:
St. Johns River Water Management District Site Review
A site review was conducted with the St. Johns'River Water Management District (SJRWMD) on the
Lake Jessup Grove property on 16 March 1999. Present for the site review were:
Anthony Miller; SJRWMD
Michael Howe; Lotspeich and Associates, Inc. (L&A)
The purpose of this site review was to field verify the landward extent of wetlands within the subject
property which had been previously flagged by L&A in accordance with the Unified Wetland
Delineation Methodology for the State of Florida dated July 1995. The review was limited to the
wetland areas within the forested southern section of the site.
Two wetlands had been flagged in the forested southern area. Mr. Miller agreed with most of the
wetland boundaries as flagged by L&A. Additional flags were added to the line around the wetland
in the western ponion of the site as shown in the attached figure. This additional area (0.6:t acre)
was determined to be jurisdictional based on the presence of hydric soil indicators. These new flags
should be located by a surveyor and included on all permit plans submitted to the SJRWMD.
Also noted during the field visit was an adult and juvenile bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalis). Th~
two birds were observed roosting in a large pine tree on-site. No nests were found in any of the trees
in the area. As noted during our preliminary evaluation, there are numerous bald eagle nesting sites
hi the vicinity of the site, but none are known to occur on-site. We would recommend that the site
be monitored prior to the beginning of the next nesting season (:t September - October) to determine
if any new bald eagle nests have been built on-site.
This is the writer's opinion and interpretation of the site review. Unless advised in writing to the
contrary, it is assumed those in attendance are in agreement with the statements set forth and work
will proceed on thh basis.
Distribution List:
Tim Grusenmeyer; Grusenmeyer, Scott & Associates, Inc.
Dick Strous; Elizabeth Morse Genius Foundation
File/Carol S. Lotspeich
422 West Fairbanks Avenue, Suite 201, Winter Park, Florida 32789 (407)740-8482 FAX (407)645-1305
~~ G~ >.
-v
l.o,
:-~
~~
Ie $."'.~. or I.Qr Ill', SI':'C. :l
(".8. f, PC, ~)
AS SH'OltN OH ~ DOOAImI!HT 01'
. TRAHSI"O/lTA'nOH ~/W w,p, srCTlON He.
\ 8777D-2JC:. t1Antl Ol~PO
0'.......'
.j
~i.l
..~..I
11\
0
.
;;
~
fl.
~"
~ ,~
~ ;
~i! I
~~~ ..,-I
~~~
~~~
S2
~
'j
J
JJ
ml...<i.
11
J
~
'r]
.J
,.J
'.".1...
.'.:
..'
t\.
J
:1
]
]
~
At Co NltD
. rffOllm ON n::~ oeP.4KlllD'tT or
i S1'MT~TTOH ~~. S!r::rTOtI No..
. 'P77f)- .2.J02, 0.4 T'FJ) 0 I -90)
.1
9j00.
...
'"
..
!"
~
JoB' ....---- - -, ,-~..:::::/"'" -......... ....
rr TO.ll," E.-;~' -'-.-.'...... ...,
_ -.-.-. --- --. ._----......----.- '.. .................. . 1,0,....
,- --.. ..----. ..
S'L . "",11
.............5'J 50 ~
5.3./ .._ .-- r-, '11'1.17
/ / '(;}
W\- 5'L: ~_%07p~ \~"'-2J
,-I: . ~\ .
:::-4; I.J, 1
..' \ ~'_II'f)~ V ~....-t4
~bO (.,\ lD2. ,
If ..-. WI-I ~ f(e/"'I1C/(,
/ ~~."
: I WI-I' 1'1 20
t WI-IO LAPLAND WI."I> J J
C"'''i~C ( ~
. I
l,)I-'-, {"o
I W\-L,2..
z
~
.. .-----.-..'
EASTERlY R/W
UN!
C c::>V'-.'1~ <- t
~j\_P -t.:. WI-5'i
'tr"..,-1
\
'i;J
. ~"l~ wi-5
-b.., In-I
....
R€.V\olOJ-e..- ~ ..'
CC""l" 't..-c.-t
W\-3 ~WI'S
W I - 5" *..0 w \ - 8-
~ ",. II
1).S".."".r.rc.l .
W\-~ *-0"""" Wl.q
(ovv,~ Ll
L...l \ - G) l <:> W \ - l; 0
\
A. ,"_U
1_'" .'-0
- .4
!-
11'1->>
/,,/
,/ ~'
I //
I I
. .
, !
. \
I .
\ '\
, ,
. .
\ \
l \
I
" )
".!
Cl:>~....~ l-t
W \-2..\ to
'-..)\- so
,,,~t, ~
~ I"-If
I
I
~ WI-1]
/
".,-IJ .It
~ '-' ",_'4
t W'-1~
..,-"
I
{AWl -11
I
~.~.
Il1-JO
lJNJ
~
- .;;-;
.... -' WI-JI
'"-', t1... '
..1r' ....
Wl-JI '8' " "'roM
1l1-J5 .
:t 120
~~ L
~~
,~
1Il
!
--.-..... .
J"C:;SlAf (". uv (.. (Jr Orel t.j
c;PIPtJ
GRAPHIC SCALE
D eo
l~ ~jw' lIF-~,
110
J~
,to
,. d-==1
.; -4
( IN FEET )
1 1noh = 120 !t.
R'ECEIVED
MAR 2 L 1999
LOTSPEICH AND ASSOC.IHC.
)
J
. "'\
'., j
" "/
J
r-J
~:, :
0}
iP..
IJ
~' 1
,~-
,]
~
T.~.J
j
, ';1
\ .r.
h~
J"
.~> I
',',
.}
J
],
:J
J
'J
~J
J
V" k2,~~!~!~!~u~~1 Associates~l!lc)
r-'
(
28 June 1999
L&A No, 98184,23
Doc. \IMHD\98184F28.LET
Mr, Dick Strous
Elizabeth Morse Genius Foundation
400 N. New York Avenue
Winter Park, Florida 32789
RE: Lake Jessup Grove Property
70:t acres in Sections 37, Township 21 South, Range 31 East
Seminole County, Florida
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Jurisdictional Determination
Dear Mr. Strous:
JUN 3 (j 1999
Please fInd enclosed for your fIles a copy of the verified wetland survey from the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers (US ACE) and the accompanying correspondence from the USACE, The jurisdictional
determination has been assigned number 199900781 (JD-TH), and is legally binding for a period of
five years.
The acquisition of the jurisdictional determination completes Lotspeich and Associates Inc. (L&A)
scope of services contracted in the Memorandum of Agreement dated 1 December 1998. Please feel
free to call us if you have any questions regarding this jurisdictional determination or other related
land use issues regarding the project site. L&A looks forward to working with you as the
development of this property progresses.
Sincerely,
LOTSPEICH AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
..-a/(~;? ~
Michael Howe .
Research Scientist n
Enclosures
cc: File/Carol S. Lotspeich
422 West Fairbanks Avenue, Suite 201, Winter Park, Florida 32789 (407)740-8482 FAX (407) 645-1305
l
!
]
J
j
..-,
~
J
1
J
.J
,
J
J
--J
.
_J
1
J
:/-.
!
-2-
You are cautioned that work performed below the mean high
water line or ordinary high water line in waters of the United
States, or the discharge of dredged or fill material into adjacent
wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit could subject
you to enforcement action, Receipt of a permit from the Florida
Department of Environmental Protection does not obviate the
requirement for obtaining a Department of the Army permit for the
'work described above prior to commencing work..
Thank you for your cooperation with our permit program, If
you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me
.at the letterhead address of by telephone at 904-325-2028,
Sincerely,
~!I;~
Thaddieus L. Hart
Environmental Protection Specialist
j
1-~
.l
J
I'J
.,
.",.'.
?
tj
I~'.;}'
n
.. .~
~]'
. .
..'
'.J..
51
]'....
.,
J
II
iI
'J:'
"
"
:~
:1
.~.}.'.t.
..
:i~
'I'
'J'
:"
:]
J
u;t~B .
IJI #1
WI - ~t{
~m:rQ Lotspeich and Associates, Inc.
I!. ECOLOGICAL CONSULTANTS
mWntFIirllrisA_. SIiIa20I, v.w.PnFl. 32789
(407) 7~ Fa: 64S-I305 H.IoI: l~a>I.lXlIft
File: 98184-B,CDR Drawn By:
,
.....~.. !'
~:.;;~
l.t J.. " ). d-.
Lake Jessup Grove Property
Boundary Map
...... North Scale: 1.=400'
-.-- Figure 1
+" 70 .ens In
Sedion 37. Township 21 SOUlh. Range 31 Eaa1
Seminole CCl\.I'1ly, Aoride
JM Job No: 98184,33 Date: 12 January 1999
r .\
r
, I
'j.
:-J
.~]
,
(I
:]
I
J
'J
:.:1
J
1
.J
'j
I
J
J
..A~PARTMENT OF THE ARMY
JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT CORPS OF ENGINEERS, PA1..AT1<A REGULATORY OFFICE
tlO2 NORTH PALM AVENUE
PA1..ATKA, FLORIDA 321n-25Q2
June 9, 1999
Regulatory Division
Atlantic Permits Branch
199900781 (JD-TH)
Ms. Ann M. Hague
~otspeich & Associates, Inc,
422 West Fairbanks Avenue
Suite 201
Winter Park, Florida 32789
Dear Ms. Hague:
Reference is made to'your request for a jurisdictional
validation, submitted on behalf of your client Lake Jessup Grove.
Enclosed is a copy of a survey showing the approximate,Department
of the Army jurisdiction of the property in question. The
property,is located in Section 37, Township 21 South, Range 31
East, Seminole County, Florida. A Department of the Army permit
will be required in the area marked as wetlands or waters of the
United States, The ju~isdictional determination has been assigned
number 1999007'81 . (JD-TH), Please refer to this number in future
correspondence.
Please be advised that the jurisdictional delineation shown is
based on the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (1987)
and is valid for a period of no longer than five years from the
date of this letter, Additionally, this delineation has been
based on information provided by your office, Should we determine
that the information was incomplete or erroneouS, this delineation
would be invalid, If after a five-year period this jurisdictional
delineation has not be specifically revalidated by the Corps of
Engineers, it shall automatically expire. Any reliance upon
jurisdictional correspondence beyond that time frame may lead to
incorrect planning and design efforts, as well as possible
violation of current Federal laws and/or regulations, You may
revalidate or update the jurisdictional delineation as appropriate
for your project duration, Any revalidation or updating will then
reflect current Federal laws,
If there is any proposed encroachment into wetlands within the
Department of the Army jurisdiction, a joint permit application
should be submitted. 'RECt:I'~ ~!.e~'
JUN 2 5 1999
LOTSPEICH AND ASSOc.mt.
Cf818t( ,~I
_... -"t\. "'-. ,.t:J
.. ..... - '--- ,- .. '-' -' v, ,- ~,u V->lO IV''''''; 'UI"I~~ MAl' IHAI-I-Il; CIRCULATION'
ELEMENT MAPS AND TEXT AND ADDITION OF POUCY STATEMENTS FOR'Co'NSERVATlON
AND RESOURCE PROTECTION,
CITY OFWINTER SPRINGS
....(;.:..
.)
..;: t.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS PROPOSES,
ro ADOPT THE FOl,LOWING ORDINANCES TO CHANGE THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATIONS: . "
~ ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA ADOPTING A LARGE':' ,
SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMEtirr. (LS-CPA;1-OO) CHANGING THE FuniRE lAND, USE MAP ':.~.
DESIGNATION FROM (SEMINOLE COUNTY) "SUBURBAN'ESTATES" TO (CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS) ,
'GREENEWAY INTERCHANGE DISTRICT" ON'THE 67.85 ACRE PARCEL (AKA)'HE EUZABETH MORSE'-
=OUNDATlON PROPERTY) LOCATED ON THE,WEST SIDE OF S,R. 417~THE GREENEWAY", NORTH OF S,A.
134, SOUTH OF LAKE JESSUP AND EAST OF SPRING AVENUE: PURSUANT TO 166,041 flORIDA.
3TATUTES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABIUTY; CONFUCTS AND AN EFFECTIVE, DATE. (SEE MAP "A' RELAT,
NG TO ~,!S AMENDMENT) . '. ~
\N ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA ADOPTING A LARGE . ,
3CALE COMPREHENSIVE PlAN AMENDMENT (LS-CPA-4.QO) CHANGING THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP "
)ESIGNATlON FROM "MIXED USE" TO THE NEW "TOWN CENTER" DESIGNATION ON AN 18+I-ACRE PAR- ' ..
;EL LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE FOOT RETENTION BASIN JUST EAST OF THE U,S, POST ::
)FFICE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE CURVE ALONG S.R. 434; PURSUANT TO 166,041 FLORIDA, ~
nATUTES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABIUTY, CONFUCTS AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE, (SEE MAP "B' RELAT- , :'
NG TO THIS AMENDMENT)
IN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA ADOPTING A lARGE
>CAlE COMPREHENSNE PLAN AMENDMENT (LS-CPAoS-OO) CHANGING THE .FUTURE' lAND US'E MAp. ~.
)ESIGNATlON FROM "MODERATE DENSITY RESIDENTIAL: (3,6 - 6,5 DU PER ACRE) AIiID 'CONSERVATlON" ;;'
'0 THE NEW 'TOWN CENTER"DESIGNATlON ON AN APPROXIMATELY 34,64 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON ~
'HE WEST SIDE OF TUSKAWlLLA ROAD ACROSS FROM THE FORMER HI-FLAVOR MEAT PLANT BOUNDED . ':
)N THE NORTH SIDE BY MILKY WAY AVE, AND ON THE SOUTH SIDE BY OAK FOREST (JNIT 7 SUBDMSION, :
SEE MAP "C' RELATING TO THIS AMENDMENT)
,1'1 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA DOPTING AN EMER-
lENCY lARGE SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (LSoEM-CPAo1.Q1) CHANGING THE FUTURE '~
AND USE MAP DESIGNATION FORM 'COMMERCIAL' TO THE 'MEDIUM DENSITY.RESIDENTIAL' DESIGNA' .~,
101'101'1 AN APPAOXIMATLEY 36.21 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDE OF S.A. 434 AND.: '.
)1'1 THE EAST AND WEST SIDE OF MOSS ROAD IN GENERAL PROXIMITY TO THE S,R: 434 AND MOSS ;
10Aq INTERSECTION, (SEE MAP "0" RELATING'TO T!-fIS AMENDMENT) . ,
. " '.: ;' I,' : . . ,",.
oN ORDIANCE OF THE CITY. OF WINTER SPIRNGS, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDAAOOPTING A CHANGE '
IF ZONING (REZo3-01) CHANGING THE ZONING MAP DESIGNATION FROM C,1 'NEIGHBORHOOD COM. ,_,
lERCIAL'..TO ZONING DESIGNATION ~-3'"MULTI.FAMILY'DWEWNG" DISTRICT ON APPROXIMATElY 35 ' ;
CRES LOCATED IN AND AROUND THE INTERSECTION OF MOSS ROAD AND STATE ROAti 434' (SEE MAP, :.'
:' RELATIN(3 TO THIS ~EZONING) . '. :..'. ' . ",' 0:',,;,. :. ,...' ;
1'1 ORplNANCE OF THE criY OF WINTER SPRINGS, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA'A60PTlNC3"A SMALL
CALE COMPRHENSNE PLAN AMENDMENT '(SS-CPA:2.Q1) CHANGING THE FUTURE LAND, USE MA DES- _
lNATlON FROM (COUNTY) "COMMERCIAL', "INDUSTRIAL:, AND "LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL: TO (CITY) , .
'ESIGNATlON "INDUSTRIAL: ON AN APPROXIMATELY 6.2 ACRES LOCATED ON NURSERY.ROAD JUST,':-:
~.T ~~ y~, 17/92, ,<S~E MAP"F" REl.J\TlNG TOTH.IS AME~DMENT) . ~',:. <..' ":
N 'oRoi~CE OF'THE CITY OF V'INTER'SI'RINGS. SEMINoLe COUNTY, .FLORIO"iADOPTlNGA CHANGe ;"
'F. ~ql';l.lNG "(REZo2'!l.1l ~CI;iANC3ING THE:zONING MAP DE~IC3I':lAllON FROM (CQUNl:Yl c-2.:RETAJl COMo., ':
IERc:!/IC(:~ ;'.GEN~ COM/vIERCIA\. &WHOLESALE~,. R~l;~ ',~INGLE 'FAMILY DWEWNI3'TO (CITY)'
qNlNG.O~IGNATlON'C:2 :GENERAL COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRiAL:.DISTRICT ON APPROXIMATELY.6,2'
C:AE~(I;OCAIED Of'l ~URSERY ROAD JUST EAST OF iJ,S:17t92(SI;E ~';.G~ FI~LAl1N(HO TliI.$.Re;zON- "
~~)t~:f'~.i') ;~;"t~.',:}.':. '~..' :' . :. ~~~:':." ;-:':.' ;:~:~: g':~~...,.:ir?<}/',,,, '; ~;'-:: ,." ~'" ".i'.. '..". .':: ~. ~.:. ~
~;pRp'iNAN.c~ Of,W(CITY OF WINTER SPfl(NGS,':Se,MiNPLE COUNrY,'F,LORIOkAqoPJING A lARGE;'I~, '1
~,CPMPREH~~!VE PLf.NAMENDM.ENT(~,.cPA-&-oO) WIi.ICHWOULDCOMPLETEl,.r.REPlbCE THE'.. ;: i
~(:tAtol~i~S I~Jl;iE.Tf.lAF.FIC CIRC?ULATl()N,!OLI.'MENT INV<?\.UME 1 O~ 2 AND'~.OF~, :',,),c: ...... ,:;.
~9R.QI~C~.of~T1:IF CITY OF WI~'sP~INGS; SEMINOLE GO\JN1Y, Fi:.o~\OA AOciMiNG!.n:.R~:'(3)':: :
\flGE?SCA[e:COMPREHENSIVE PlAN'AMENDMENT f'ROPOSAlS (lG-CPAo2,3,4-98)Tb 'ADP:TEXr.-.rO I .
~EJ,AND'.USE ElEMENT AND ,THE,CONSERVATlON ElEMENT:ANDINTERGOVERNMENTAlCoORoINA.,' :;
9N 'ELeMEJiri,niEsE PROPOSED AM~N'DMENTS SEe:~ TO:.F)JRTHERENSUR~NODEsTRudi10~jjF\; ':
~GETATl.ON AND WlLOUFE,.LOSS OF SlqNIFJCANT CULTURAL.AND A!lCHEOLOGI~ RE~URCES:ON'l.:.
rn'.oWNED PROPERTY, AND' THAT THE CITY WILl COORDINATE WITH THE'RESOURCE PROTECTION .:. .
'#I~ .OF LO~. ~rr:~~. ANDA;i?EI,W;:JU~'sPIG!IOtol~',iN:TH!= ~EW.toWN G~ .DISJAlP:i;,\(::) .. f:: .
t. . ", ", . : .' ,. , . ',' .... , . ~ "'. - ...., -..,. . . '"',' . ,,' ",~".:..'. "~. '.,1,_0.. r ~ ',' '. . , . '. . .' .f
i.E:Cif.i#'MMi~slojil.;Wi~~oLO A'FiRst~~i~~:oj:'lii~'.ABOvi:9!'1DiNAN.C~. ON' MAR.CH.21;.2091'" I.
~,~:OO'J>,~:i~P .WlL,L:HQLO A. SECOND (AOQPl:!~N).P!.WY9, l:i~INGON ~E.AB()VE9RI;>1~9El? ON' "
~?,~ ~~~~~~)&J:7~~.f:."h .<':: :': . "..,::'., .<:;:. Y ';:'/':~,,:<'./:' ~': '~;/"""".:;'::'.' ';<".:.:':\~~;'<>:. : ~ '.
"!~i;;I'.!J.~f!.q'H€ABlN(,3S'.WlLL .T~..I'LA.C;:E;"T..Crrt.;!:f.o'JJ,,;1126:~. STATE:RQAD'434;-.W1.NTER: :
l.~~.~..',~~.~A:.I.~~~ PERS~NS.~~ AT!~~:~/NP BE~EARD,:; :" <:,.~ '.',. ..~:' ::'; '\:":'<i:',.; i;
lP.f1J9~_INFORMATlON P.ERTAJNIN~ :r:0 THE ABOVE MAY .BE. o,aTAINE[) F.1;l01.1 :[HE 9FFIC'i'9.~ .r!:!S; :
E;.?H~B!1t?R '19.~~.!N~?~.~T'P.~.<::~ !40ry ~?r:J.~go~?~\,:.:;;~~. ; .;:. . ,. . .~. . ;.:':: "'<" :j;', '. ,
~SqNS.~ Di~iLtTll:s NEEDING ASSISTANCE' rp; p.NlJ1qir~1i;Ii~:#:N6F,jHESE'PRq'CEEOiNG~, ::.
~!Jl.Pi~!'iT"'CT~~,I:JUM@ RESOURC~ QOORDINft..tO~;~~I-j.()iJ.M;\~ApVANC;:~ OF TH~ ME~f)l!3 . ,. r
. ~~~~~~~:.i.~ ..... ;; ~: ~ . !~"'~: ....:: y: '~':~':'~C;;;}i:r.;.: ,~:~,::,:.,:! ,:~,:';-_ r. I~
,. ., !.Q .::~.~l~f~6~ci~Qci10:APP.'E'A,i:~R~doMI.1ENciJi.n6rtSk6lsf~Be:By~m~t ~'::;;'" ..~' 1
T"r'COMMlSSI . CTTu 7'ot<f'( MATTeftCONSI~EI!fIN(3~;YOtTWltl-NEEO-A-. _ _~""
~P,,:\~ .Qf.T\i!= ,I'ROff~qlt:i~~,ANpjI5RR;~4~H,P\JRPOSEl?J' YOUiMAY t;l~/i;qIJQ.'~iJp!-J,R. E,'J!iAT A,vi;R' .
\'ri~REqORP9F TJ.iE PR09~epIN,GSIl?;~?E UPON~':i~C,H TH~~APPEA~'I~ !Q:~~ ~A~79; . .: .
~w~-} .... ".*;;:~~M~~;~~~:';'~:n;.!~t?;r:;s::';'
},'.:. Cl'l)':q.t~ ' '., . , . .;~;?~':/;i. "
~ . ';:!i;!
:!i
'I~'
N :1
~
i
i
:1.'
"
i
;1'
,
i
'i
I
I
\
I
r
I
I
J
..,
,.
"\
,--,.-
-----
--
..--"-
.: '. ~
<~~ :
,~
-......... .
~ .
~.
....~
........-.....-...
.:' ~',
.,:;
4!hgii{~}m~imti.~~~~f#~~~Uftt%~~1~{~i%f;
. .\.'~
MAl' .
'".
.~l.ura"IlUIt1U'f~
""'"
MAl' .
.
i
I
,
'I
>!
.L,
.n.
r
'."," ,".
\ ;:....
1:-:
.!!!: .
r
ATTACHMENT B