HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000 11 13 Public Hearings O Traffic Circulation Element
COMMISSION" AGENDA
ITEM
o
Consent
Informational
Public Hearing X
Regular
November 13,2000
Meeting
~. #-
Mgr. / D.
Authorizati n
REQUEST: The Community Development Department - Planning Division requests that the
City Commission hold a public hearing to consider transmitting a large scale
comprehensive plan amendment (LS-CPA-6-00) to the Florida Department of
Community Affairs, which would completely replace the text and maps in the
Traffic Circulation Element in Volume 1 of2 and 2 of2 in the City's
Comprehensive Plan.
PURPOSE:
The City needs to update the Traffic Circulation Element based on the results of the City of
Winter Springs Transportation Study prepared by CPH Engineering, Inc.. Supplement # 1,
prepared December 1999, was necessary because the Town Center Concept was adopted after
the Study was completed. Supplement # 1 addresses the traffic impact in the Town Center.
APPLICABLE LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY:
The provisions of 163.3184(3)(a) F.S, which state: "Each local governing body shall transmit
the complete proposed comprehensive plan or plan amendment to the state land planning
agency, the appropriate regional planning council and water management district, the
department, and the Department of Transportation immediately following a public hearing
pursuant to subsection (15) as specified in the state land planning agency's procedural rules.
The local governing body shall also transmit a copy of the complete proposed comprehensive
plan or plan amendment to any other unit of local government or government agency in the state
that has filed a written request with the governing body for the plan or plan amendment."
CDDlNovember 6, 2000/1 0:52 AM
NOVEMBER 13, 2000
PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM 0
Page 2
The provisions of 163.3184(15)(b) F.S. which state: "The local governing body shall hold at least
one advertised public hearing on the proposed comprehensive plan or plan amendment as follows:
I. The first public hearing shall be held at the transmittal stage pursuant to subsection
(3). It shall be held on a weekday at least 7 days after the day that the
advertisement is published.
2. The second public hearing shall be held at the adoption stage pursuant to
subsection (7). It shall be held on a weekday at least 5 days after the day that the
second advertisement is published,"
The provisions of9J-11.006(1) F.A.C. which state "Each proposed amendment including
applicable supporting documents which include data and analyses shall be submitted directly to
the Florida Department of Community Affairs, Division of Resource Planning and Management,
Plan Processing Team, the appropriate regional planning council, water management district(s),
Department of Transportation and Department of Environmental Protection. Proposed plan
amendments, except those discussed under the exemption provisions of Rule 9J-I1.006(1)(a)7.
F.A.C., shall be consolidated into a single submission for each of the two plan amendments
adoption times during the calendar year. The comprehensive plan submitted pursuant to Section
163,3167 F.S., shall be counted as one of the two plan amendment adoption times during the
calendar year; however, only the submittal requirements of Rule 9J-I1.004 F.A.C. must be
followed. "
CHRONOLOGY:
.
The City adopted its current Comprehensive Plan on April 27, 1992.
.
The City Commission on November 13, 1996, hired CPR Engineering, Inc. to prepare an
update of the Traffic Circulation Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan.
.
In February 1998, the City Commission hired Dover, Kohl & partners to develop a Town
Center Concept Plan. The Commission later adopted said plan.
.
The City Commission authorized the City of Winter Springs Transportation Study in
1997.
.
The Local Planning Agency, at its October 29, 1997 meeting, voted to recommend that
the City Commission transmit the large scale comprehensive plan amendment (LG-CP A-I-
97) to the Florida Department of community Affairs, based on the findings by the City
staff as submitted to the LP A.
CDDlNovember 6, 2000/8:25 AM
NOVEMBER 13, 2000
PUBLIC HEARlNG AGENDA ITEM 0
Page 3
.
In May, 1998, the City Commission contracted with Developer, Joshi & Associates.
Rohit Joshi proposed expanding the Town Center to approximately 1,000 acres,
extending eastward to S.R. 417 (aka The GreeneWay), as well as including various
properties on the south side of S.R. 434.
.
Supplement # I was prepared and completed December, 1999 to include the traffic
impact of the Town Center.
.
The Local Planning Agency (LP A) at its March 22, 2000 meeting reviewed the proposed
Traffic Circulation Element Update large scale comprehensive plan amendment along
with the addition (Supplement # 1 [LG-CPA-I-97, now LS-CPA-6-00] and
recommended adoption.
.
The 1 st hearing of Ordinance 2000-12 concerning the Traffic Circulation Element Update
large scale comprehensive plan amendment along with the addition (Supplement # 1 was
scheduled on the April 10, 2000 meeting of the City Commission, but was withdrawn at
the recommendation of the City Attorney.
CONSIDERATIONS:
.
The Traffic Circulation Element should be updated based on the results of the City of
Winter Springs Transportation Study prepared by CPH Engineering, Inc.. The
preparation of Supplement # 1 prepared December, 1999 is necessary because the Town
Center Concept has been adopted since the Study was completed.
.
The City Attorney concerned about potential procedural difficulties (the time period
between initial review by the Local Planning Agency, the ORC Report, and the second
public hearing by the City Commission), has recommended commencing the plan
amendment process again.
.
The LP A previously recommended transmittal at its March 22, 2000 meeting upon
reviewing the ORC Report recommending adoption by the Commission. City staff
recommends that the plan amendments be forwarded to DCA for approval.
.
The first (transmittal) public hearing is a forum in which the governing body votes to
either transmit the proposed large scale comprehensive plan amendment to the Florida
Department of Community Affairs and the other state agencies and regional planning
council to request their professional review and recommendations on the plan
amendment. The ORC (objections, recommendations and comments) Report will be sent
to the City within two (2) months from the date that the plan amendment submittal is
found sufficient as a transmittal.
CDD/November 6, 2000/10:56 AM
NOVEMBER 13, 2000
PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM 0
Page 4
FUNDING:
No funds are required to transmit the large scale comprehensive plan amendment to the
Florida Department of Community Affairs.
FINDINGS:
.
A number of changes have occurred since the preparation and adoption on April 27, 1992
of the City's Comprehensive Plan, prompting the need for an update of the Traffic
Circulation Element.
.
The Florida Department of Community Affairs finalized its ORC Report on the plan
amendment and the City's consultant, CPH Engineering, Inc. has prepared a response.
.
The comprehensive plan amendment is compatible with the other elements of the City's
Comprehensive Plan
.
The comprehensive plan amendment is compatible with and furthers elements of the State
Comprehensive Plan, in Chapter 187 F.S.
.
The comprehensive plan amendment is compatible with and furthers elements of the East
Central Florida Comprehensive Regional Policy Plan.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the Staff Report and the Findings, staff recommends the Local Planning Agency make
the following recommendation to the City Commission:
1. That the City Commission hold a first (transmittal) public hearing and transmit to
the Florida Department of Community Affairs the proposed Large Scale
Comprehensive Plan Amendment (LS-CP A-6-00, formerly LG-CP A-I-97), to
update the Traffic Circulation Erement in Volume 1 of 2 and 2 of 2 of the City's
Comprehensive Plan.
2. Hold a second public hearing, after receiving and reviewing the ORC Report, to
adopt the plan amendment.
LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY RECOMMENDATION:
CDDlNovember 6, 2000/8:25 AM
NOVEMBER 13, 2000
PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM 0
Page 5
MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER BROWN:
"I would make a motion that we accept the Traffic Circulation Element, (Volume 1 of 2 and Volume
20f2)."
Motion seconded by Board Member Gregory.
AMENDMENT BY BOARD MEMBER BROWN:
"The City Attorney and City Staff recommend that the Local Planning Agency make the following
recommendations, which I make, That the City commission hold a first (transmittal) public
hearing and transmit to the Department of Community Affairs the proposed large scale
comprehensive plan amendment (LS-CP A-6-00), to completely and replace the text and maps of
the Traffic Circulation Element (Volume 1 of2 and Volume 2 of2), in the City's Comprehensive
Plan. Number two, hold a second public hearing, after receiving and reviewing the ORC Report,
to adopt the plan amendment, and also I would like to add to that an update, should certainly - an
amendment should follow to clarify the maps and some of the small items that need to be
updated." Motion seconded by Board Member Gregory. Discussion.
VOTE
Vice-Chairman Bill Fernandez aye,
Chairperson Rosanne Karr aye.
Board Member Carl Stephens aye.
Board Member Brent Gregory aye,
Board Member Tom Brown aye.
Motion carried.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Local Planning Agency Agenda Item II. F.
B. Agenda Items and Supporting Data, Inventory & Analysis for the Proposed Comprehensive
Plan Amendment LS-CPA-6-00 (This Attachment same as LPA Agenda Item II. F.
Attachment B)
April 10, 2000 Commission Agenda Item G Is1 reading Ord. 2000-12.
ORC Report (DCA 98-1) and CPH Engineering, Inc. Repsonse to ORC
Report [as Attachment B of April 10, 2000 Agenda Item G]
Letter of Transmittal of Plan Amendments to DCA and minutes of the LPA
for 10/29/97 and 11/19/97 and 12/8/97 minutes of the Commission [as
Attachment C of April 10, 2000 Agenda Item G]
December 8, 1997 Commission Regular Agenda Item A which includes
CDDlNovember 6, 2000/8:25 AM
NOVEMBER 13, 2000
PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM 0
Page 6
LPA Agenda Item II. B. "Staff Report" for March 1, 2000 and
November 19, 1997 meetings as well as the City of Winter Springs
Transportation Study, August 1997 and Supplement # 1 dated
December, 1999,
C. Legal Notice.
COMMISSION ACTION:
CDDlNovember 6,2000/8:25 AM
ATTACHMENTS A
\
\
\.
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
, 1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708-2799
Telephone (407) 327-1800
Community Development Dept.
Planning Division
LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY AGENDA ITEM
II. F.
TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ELEMENT VOLUME 1 OF 2
AND 2 OF 2
Staff Report
APPLICABLE LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY:
The provisions of 163,3211 F.S. which states in part: "Where this act may be in conflict
with any other provision or provisions of law relating to local governments having
authority to regulate the development of land, the provisions of this act shall govern
unless the provisions of this act are met or exceeded by such other provision or
provisions of law relating to local government, including land development regulations
adopted pursuant to Chapter 125 or Chapter 166, . . ."
CONSIDERA TIONS:
I. SUMMARY OF APPLICATION
APPLICANT:
City of Winter Springs
1126 East State Road 434
Winter Springs, FL 32708
REQUEST:
That the Local Planning Agency recommend the City Commission transmit the proposed
large scale comprehensive plan amendment that would completely replace the existing
Traffic Circulation Element text and maps in Volume 1 of 2 and 2 of 2.
PURPOSE:
The purpose of this request is go through the large scale comprehensive plan amendment
1
Local Planning Agency
October 25, 2000
Traffic Circulation Element Amendment
LS-CP A-6-00
procedure again with this previously reviewed proposed plan amendment. Due to
changes desired in the Town Center Concept Plan by Joshi & Associates, the former
Town Center Master Developer, the proposed revision to the Traffic Circulation Element
of the City's Comprehensive Plan was delayed and didn't meet procedural requirements
indicated in 9J-11 F,A.C.
CONSIDERATIONS:
. At its March 22, 2000 meeting, the Local Planning Agency reviewed the originally
proposed Traffic Circulation Element large scale comprehensive plan amendment with
the additional changes made by CPH Engineering and recommended the City
Commission transmit the proposed amendment.
. At its May 3, 2000 meeting, the Local Planning Agency reviewed the ORC Report
(Objections, Recommendations & Comments) issued by the Florida Department of
Community Affairs on the proposed Traffic Circulation Element large scale
comprehensive plan amendment. The LP A recommended the City Commission hold a
second (adoption) public hearing and adopt the plan amendment.
· Due to concern over procedural requirements, the City Attorney aQvises that the proposed
plan amendment be processed again.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
City Attorney and City Staff recommends the Local Planning Agency make the following
recommendation:
1. That the City Commission hold a first (transmittal) public hearing and transmit to the
Department of Community Affairs th'e proposed large scale comprehensive plan
amendment (LS-CP A-6-00) to completely replace the text and maps of the Traffic
Circulation Element Volumes 1 of 2 and 2 of 2 in the City's Comprehensive Plan.
2. Request the Department of Community Affairs to expedite its review since an ORC
Report has been issued previously and a response to the ORC Report has been made.
3. Hold a second public hearing, after receiving and reviewing the ORC Report, to adopt the
plan amendment.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Agenda Item U, A of the Local Planning Agency for May 3,2000
2
Local Planning Agcncy
OClobcr 25, 2000
Trallic Circulalion Elcmcnl Amcndmcnl
LS-CP A-o-OO
^' fl'; lJTE:s
LOCAL PLANNING AGE,'CT
OCTOBER 29. /997 - SPECIAL MEETI~G
PagcJo(5
Carl Stephens asked about Shore Road. Chaimlan Fernandez then asked "how does the City
determine whether a road is a collector road", Tom Grimms responded that "you have definitions
in your Comprehensive Plan and I believe we use F.D.O. T.'s definition on collector roads on Our
data inventory analysis". It was asked if "Morton Road was a collector road"? Mr. Lockcuff
responded saying "No",
In response to item number 3 (under Objective F, on page 8), Chainnan Fernadez asked about
emergency vehicle "response times" and if there would in fact be any improvements. Mr.
Lockcuff stated that "certainly it would improve response time".
There was discussion about the word "scenic" and related landscaping, vegetation and canopy.
Mr. Grimms clarified the difference between objectives, policies and statements. Mr. Stephens
asked about developers replacing trees when necessary. Mr. Lockcuff briefly explained the arbor
permitting process, and stated that the,Arbor ordinance was going to be re-written.
There was discussion about whether the City could obtain additional right-of-way fro'm property
owners to widen certain roads, like Panama Road.
Carl Stephens and Chainnan Fernandez commented on new Objective I, applicable speed limits
and promoting traffic flow. Discussion followed regarding the word "warrant". Mr. Zaudtke
explained about the term "warrant" and how it applied to, "non-engineering type people". Board
member Rosanne Karr said that "if this was a traffic flow document and a Department of
Transportation tenn, then it would be appropriate to leave it in". Chainnan Fernandez agreed and
asked "is this a traffic flow document - who's this written for"? Mr. Lockcuff commented that
"warrant is just a traffic engineering tem".
On Objective I, item number I) c. (on page 10) - change the word "land" to "lane".
On Objective I, item number 2) c. (on page I I) - Chairman Fernandez suggested changing the
word "warrant" to 'Justification". There was further discussion about the word "warrant" and
Board members said that if th~t word is used once, then it should be left in.
A Motion was made "that the staff recommendations that has been presented to the LP A this
evening, we recommend them to the City COmmission for the first transmittal of public hearing
transmittal to the Department of Community Affairs for proposed Large-Scale Comprehensive
Plan Amendment". The motion was amended by Vice-Chairman Brown to include "based on the
findings by the City as submitted to the LP A, this evening". Motion by Brown. Second by
Stephens. Vote: Lein, aye; Femande=. aye; Karr, aye; Stephens, aye; Brown, aye.
Motion passed.
>
B. Large Scale Comprehensive Plall Amendment to the Lalld Use
Element, Volume If oj JJ (LG-CPA-2-97) RE: State Road .f3-1 Corridor
Vision Plan (preliminary Discllssion Gnly)
AI fN UTE:S
LOC\L PLANNING AGENCY
OCTOBER 29, 1997 - SPECIAL MEETING
Page 4 or 5
Tom Grimms gave his presentation and explained that on November 19, 1997, the LPA Board
would be asked to make a recommendation regarding this matter.
Chainnan Fernandez asked "what substantial changes did the City Attorney have"? Mr. Grimms
responded that they dealt with development agreements and he then read them to the Board.
Vice-Chairman Brown asked "who the Development Review Committee was"? Mr. Grimms
responded by saying that it was comprised of "department heads...the Community Development
Department Director, the Police and Fire Chiefs, the City Engineer, the Public Works Director,
'the Building Official". .
Discussion followed regarding the proposed Town Center. Mr. Lein asked Mr. Grimms "how far
has it been expanded"? Mr. Grimms showed on the large colorized wall "Future Land Use Map"
where the changes to this area are. Several Board members advised Mr. Grimms that this section
should be re-worded to include "some additional land". '
Chainnan Fernandez commented on item numbers 3.2.2 and 3.2.3 (on page 7) and was concerned
that they "maintain a continuity of design thought...creativity...". Tom Grimms responded by
saying that "I could not comment on that...because, my understanding is that...considerations of
variances are only under the purview of the Board of Adjustments for recommendation to.the City
Corrunission" .
There was discussion regarding "committed use"? Mr. Grimms discussed using different wording
for this section.
->
C;. Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Land Use Element,
Volume I of If mid Volume II of II (LG-CPA-3-97) RE: Creating New Future
Land Use Map Designation - Highway Commercial (preliminary DisclIssion
Only)
Tom Grimms presented his findings for the Board, and identified the area in question on the large
colorized wall "Future Land Use Map". In response to a question about "Battle Ridge", Mr.
Grimms explained about the Battle Ridge Steering Committee's recent meeting and the current
status of Battle Ridge. Tom Grimms clarified that the Battle Ridge property would be "purely
residential". .
E1JTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Planning & Zoning Board - November 5, 1997 Meeting (Meeting Cancelled)
I) Discuss Establishing An Annexation Board
2) Review of Draft Portion (Task 1.01) of Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR)
MiNUTES
LOCAL PLANNJNG AGENCY
NOVEMBER ]9, ]997 - REGULAR.tv1EETING
L CALL TO ORDER. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Planning and Zoning BoardlLPA meeting was called to order Wednesday, October 29, 1997
at 7:01p.m. by Chairman Fernandez in the Municipal Building (City Hall, 1126 East State Road
434, Winter Springs, Florida). The Pledge of Allegiance followed.
ROLL CALL
Bill Fernandez, Chairman, present
Tom Brown, Vice Chairman, present
Gene Lein, present
Carl Stephens, present
Rosanne Karr, present
ALSO PRESENT
Charles C. Carrington, AlCP Community Development Coordinator
Tom GrimIns, AlCP Comprehensive Planning/Zoning Coordinator
APPROVAL OF THE OCTOBER 29, 1997 LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
SPECIAL MEETING MlNUTES
Motion by Gene Lein, second by Carl Stephens. It was agreed that the motion to adopt the
minutes of October 29, 1997 was carried unanimously by consensus of the Board.
rr REGULAR AGENDA
.1. County Proposed Community Redevelopment Agency (eRA)
Due to one of the two presenters not yet in attendance, the Board was asked if this presentation
could be delayed until the other representative arrived. The Board agreed to this, and the
presentation was delayed until after the following Agenda Item.
>
2. Large Scale Comprehensive Plall Amendment to the Land Use Elemellt
Volume 2 of 2 LG-CPA-2-97
Tom Grimms gave his presentation. He stated that the staff's recommendations to the Board
regarding this issue.
M fNUTEs
LOCAL PLANNING AGEl'iCY
NOVEMBER 19, 1997 - REGULAR MEETING
bge 2 of6
Motion: "We recommend as the Local Planning Agency to the City Commission that the
Commission hold a first transmittal public hearing and transmit to the Department of Community
Affairs a proposed Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment LG-CP A-2-97 to add to the
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element Volume 2 of 2 of the Goals, Objectives, and Policies
derived from State Road 434 Corridor Vision Plan".
Discussion. Gene Lein asked Tom Grimms if a prior inquiry of including special lighting issues
should be included. Mr. Grimms stated that he had no objections to putting this in as a policy
. statement, and that it would be appropriate. Chairman Fernandez elaborated on this subject and
suggested adding "lighting" to each place where "landscaping" is docuinented.
. ,
Chairman Fernandez stated for t,he reco,r9 "we have been here and done .that many times with the
Town Center, with the new development and the'Re-Development Area. We~ve had hearings,
we've taken testimony and evidence. We've done planning, we've made our minute changes, and
as Mr. Lein has pointed out, this was - the lighting issue was addressed the last time with people
from the Beautification of Winter Springs Board, as well as the Commerce and Industry Board.
So, for the record, if there's not much discussion this evening, it is because we've been there and
done that".
Mr. Grimms suggested that on page 5, Goal 2, the words "unique lighting" could be added. With
further discussion by the Board Members 'and, Mr. Grimms, it was suggested that the wording
should be as follows: "uniformly and uniquely lit corridor with scenic gateways" and this be
added to the proposed motion on the floor.
Motion by Brown. Second by Stephens. Vote: Karr, aye; Stephens, aye; Lein, aye; Brown, aye;
FenJalldez, aye.
Motion carried.
1. County Proposed Community Redevelopment Agency (eRA)
(postponed from earlier in the evening)
With both of the presenters now in attendance, the Board listened to a brief introduction on this
subject by Tom Grimms. Mr. Grimms stated that "this project has been in the making for some
time. There has been a stoic U.S. 17/92 corridor steering committee that has for some extended
time in coming up with ideas on how to improve the appearance and function of the corridor, and
this basically has been on the minds of the County Commissioners and they've come to the point
where they've decided to take the move to create a Community Redevelopment Agency with
findings of fact that there is blight and that as part of the Florida Statutes on that, Chapter 163,
Part 2, it requires the setting up of a District Agency Board and developing a Redevelopment
Plan".
MfNUTEs
LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
NOVHIBER 19. 1997 - REGUl.AR MEETING
P~gc 4 of6
Mr. Easton then discussed such areas of interest as the tax increment issue, providing continuity
throughout the entire conidor, redeveloping the sites on the conidor that currently have a
negative impact, and the proposed Board of Directors to oversee this project. He also discussed
how Casselberry and Sanford have already established their own CRA's and how we could all
work together to make significant progress.
Vice Chairman Brown confirmed that we were in Area Two' (2) - the "Winter Springs/Spring
Hammock" area. Chairman Fernandez then asked how was the Redevelopment Area determined?
Mr. Easton explained that the boundary was detennined by a number of factors to include breadth
of space, property lines, natural features and changes in land use.
Motion: "We as the Local Planning Agency recorrunend to the City Commission that they do
. pass the Resolution in support of the County for initiation of 17/92 CRA Corrid<:>r Redevelopment
Plan".
Motion by Brown. Second by Karr. Vote: Lein, aye; Femal1dez, aye; Karr, aye; Stephens, aye;
Brown, aye.
Motion passed.
;:>
3. Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Land Use Element
Volume 1 of 2 and Volume 2 of 2
LG-CPA-3-97
Mr. Grimms presented staff's findings and recorrunendations regarding the creation of a new
future land use map designation - the "GreeneWay Interchange District". Mr. Grimms mentioned
to the Board that since they have received their information package for this evening's meeting,
there had been a further development: an "interim development agreement has been tendered".
Mr. Grimms ~Iaborated by saying that "if the interim development agreement is agreeable to the
property owner, and they execute it with the City, then this property is pulled out of the New
Development Area Overlay Zoning District". This matter is scheduled to go before the City
Commission on November 24, 1997.
M~garet (Missy) Cassells, 907 Old England Avenue, Winter Park., Florida 32789 spoke further
on this issue. Mr. Lein asked "if after aU the time periods are concerned, and Missy doesn't come
back in with the property...does that deeply affect the Development...New Development Area"?
Charles Carrington responded that basically "all it is...is a written agreement between both parties
that the City and the property owner will work diligently during the next eighteen months to
accomplish these tasks...that have to be accomplished to realize this new district." There was
further discussion on this subject.
.HfNUTEs
LOCAL PL\.o'lNIl'iG AGENCY
NOVEMBER 19.1997. REGlf1..AR f-,IEEllNG
P'ge.5 of6
:tYro tion: "I'd like to make a motion that the Local Planning Agency recommend to the City
COrrunlssion the findings from the staffs reconunendatio(1, that the City ColTlITlission hold a first
transmittal public hearing, and transmit to the Department of Community Affairs, the proposed
Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment, LG-CP A-3-97, creating a new future land use
designation...the GreeneWay Interchange District in the Comprehensive Plan Use Element Goals,
Objectives and Policies, Volume 2 0[2". Discussion.
Motion by Brown Second by Karr. Vote: Stephens, aye; Lein, aye; KarT, aye; Femandez, aye;
Brown, aye.
, Motion carried.
::>
4. Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Land Us,e Element
Volume 2 of 2 LG-CPA-4-97
Mr. Grimms explained to the Board the staffs findings and recommendations regarding the
Hubert Early lawsuit, density levels and related dwellings per acre. Mr. Grimms did state that this .
was a City initiated Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Lein then asked if the
Commission would now accept it, since it was turned down at an earlier date. Mr. Grimms
explained that the Commission actually had not taken any action on this matter. He reminded the
Board that there are only two (2) times during the year to send off Large Scale Comprehensive
Plan Amendments, and the next peri9d will be in about six (6) months. There was further
discussion.
Motion: "I'll make a motion that we recommend as the Local Planning Agency to the City
Commission the Staff's recommendation that the City Commission hold a first -transmittal public
hearing to transmit to the Department of Community Affairs the Proposed Large Scale
Comprehensive Plan Amendment LG.-CP A-4-97 eliminating the minimum density requirements
for residential land-use and Policies 1, 2, ), 5, 6, 7, under Objective 'A, of GoalJ, Land-Use
Element in Vo,Iume,2 of2 of the Comprehensive Plan.... Discussion.
Motion by Brown. Second by Karr. Vote: Brown, aye; Stephens, aye; Lein, nay; Karr, aye; ,
Fenzandez, aye.
Motion carried.
5. Review of Draft Portion (Task J.OJ) of Evaluation and Appraisal Report
(EAR)
The Board decided to table this item until the next meeting.
Motion by Karr. Second by Brown. 771e motion was carried by COl15enSlIS of the Board.
e
e
.>
-
Regular Meeting City Commission
December 8, 1997
97-98-05
Page 7
the developer offered for a two year period (two years from the d;lte of completion) and the
issue of an additional review ( every 5 years)); also to have a formal development order with
findings of fact that will be recorded. Seconded by Commissioner Miller. Discussion. Mayor
Partyka suspended the motion and asked if there was a motion to hear the developer speak.
Motion was made by Commissioner Gennell to hear the developer. Seconded by
Commissioner Miller. Discussion. Vote: Commissioner Miller: aye; Commissioner Blake: aye;
Commission,er Martinez: nay; Commissioner Gennell: aye; Commissioner McLeod: aye.
Motion passes. Mr. Saathoff gave a packet of Richland Property's materials to the Clerk for
the record. Commissioner Gennell asked about a tree survey; Commissioner Gennell stated
that she would like to see that the engineer's documents and findings of fact are added with'
the City's are made part of the recorded document. Commissioner Martinez read about
FEMA, regarding flood plains. Commissioner Blake asked about the 100 yr. and 500 yr. flood
elevations. Commissioner Gennell said her understanding of the motion includes the factual
findings of the engineers with their stamp being attached to the recorded document. Attorney
Guthrie said to ratify the representation before with regard to the cost regarding the
homeowners responsibility and the bond requirements. Mr. Saathoff stated yes. Vote on
original motion: Commissioner Miller: aye; Commissioner Blake: aye; Commissioner
Martinez: nay; Commissioner Gennell: aye; Commissioner McLeod: aye. Motion passes.
Mayor Partyka called a recess at 9:05 p.m. Mayor Partyka reconvened the meeting at 9: 17 p.m.
Community Development DepartmentIPlanning Division
A Requests the Conunission to hold a Public Hearing to consider whether to transmit the large scale
comprehensive plan amendment (LG-CP A-I-97) to the Florida Department of Community Affairs,
to update the Traffic Circulation Element in Volume 1 and 2 of the Comprehensive Plan. PURPOSE:
the City needs to update the Traffic Circulation Element based on the results of the recently
completed City of Winter Springs Transportation Study prepared by Conklin, Porter.& Holmes. The
contents of the Study are intended to replace completely the current text and maps in the Traffic
Circulation Element Volume l' of 2 and Volume 2 of 2. The changes in the text require the
submission of a large scale comprehensive plan amendment to the Florida Department of'Community
Affairs:
Mr. Carrington gave his presentation.
Mayor Partyka asked if there was any Public Input on this item. There was no public comment on
this item.
Commissioner Gennell asked about any funding changes. Kip Lockcuff, Public WorkslUtility
Director, stated that the City does not receive any funding from any agency; the only change will be
the change of the impact fees that is collected from the developers, the fees are lower by 40%,
Commission Martinez asked about four laning of Winter Springs Blvd. Terry Zaudtke, consulting
engineer, stated that there is no plan to four lane Winter Springs Blvd" there will be turning lanes put
Regular Meeting City Commission
Decem ber 8, 1997
97-98-05
Page 8
in at the appropriate time,
Motion was made by Commissioner Gennell to approve Agenda Item A. Seconded by
Commissioner Martinez. Discussion. Commissioner Miller had a question regarding a road
at the back of Winding Hollow, as shown in figure A-4. Mr. Zaudtke stated that figure A-4
will be modified to accurately be shown as A-3. Commissioner McLeod asked about Shore
Road as a collector. Mr. Zaudtke stated it st.'\tes that Shore Road will be eliminated as a
collector and w'iU not have the ability to connect to S.R 434 and 419. Commissioner Gennell
has question regarding figure 8. Vote: Commissioner Blake: aye; Commissioner Martinez:
aye; Commissioner Gennell: aye; Commissioner McLeod: aye; Commissioner Miller: aye.
Motion passes.
Teny Zaudtke, Conklin, Porter and Holmes, the City's consulting engineer, stated that he will make
changes regarding figure A-4 where it will correspond to A-3, and figure 8.
Community Development Department/Planning Division
> B. Requests the Commission hold a Public Hearing to consider whether to transmit the large scale
comprehensive plan amendment (LG-CP A-4-97) to the Florida Department of Community Affairs,
recommending elimination of the minimum density requirement of residential land use categories in
the Land Use Element in Volume 2 of 2 of the Comprehensive Plan. PURPOSE: to prevent future
situations arising where a property owner cannot develop his property at a density level indicated in
the zoning district that may be lower than the minimum density level stated in the Comprehensive
. Plan. The minimum density requirement in the residential land use categories would be eliminated
in the Land Use Element in Volume 2 of2, The changes in the text require the submission ofa large
scale comprehensive plan amendment to the Florida Department of Community Affairs:
Mr. Carrington gave his presentation.
Mayor Partyka aSked if there was any public input. There was no public comment.
Motion was made by Commissioner McLeod to transmit the LG-CPA-4-97 to the' Florida
Department of Community Affairs recommending the elimination of the minimum density
requirement of the residential land use categories in the Land Use Element in Volume 2 of 2
of the Comprehensive Plan, based on the findings indicated within the document and the
recommendation of the Local Planning Agency that the City Commission hold a first
transmittal public he.'\ring and transmit to the Department of Community Affairs the proposed
large sc.:'\le amendment. Seconded by Commissioner Blake. Discussion. Vote: Commissioner
Martinez: aye; Commissioner Gennell: aye; Commissioner McLeod: aye; Commissioner
Miller: aye; Commissioner Blake: aye. Motion passes.
" Community Development Department/Planning Division
~ C. Requests the Commission hold a Public Hearing to consider whether to transmit the large scale
comprehensive plan amendment (LG-CPA-3-97) to the Florida Department of Community Affairs,
',-
e
e
,
/
e
RegubH' Meeting City Commission
Decem ber 8, 1997
97-98-05
Page 9
which would create a new Future Land Use Map designation "GreeneWay Interchange District".
PURPOSE: the purpose of this large scale comprehensive plan amendment which would create a new
Future Land Use Map designation "GreeneWay Interchange District" replacing the "Mixed Use"
designation on the subject property. This would allow the subject property to be developed more
appropriately oriented to the type of activity generated by a major highway, such as the beltway (the
GreeneWay) that intersects S.R. 434 on the eastern ed~e of the City:
Mr. Carringto.n gave his presentation. Discussion.
Mayor Partyka asked if there was any public comment. There was no public comment.
'Motion was made by Commissioner Martinez to approve transmittal of the large scale
comprehensive plan amendment LG-CPA-3-97 to the Florida Department of Community
Affairs. Seconded by Commissioner Gennell. Discussion. Vote: Commissioner Gennell: aye;
Commissioner McLeod: aye; Commissioner Miller: aye; Commissioner Blake: aye;
Commissioner Martinez: aye. Motion passes.
:>
Community Development DepartmentIPlanning Division
D. Requests the Commission hold a Public Hearing to consider whether to transmit the large scale
comprehensive plan amendment (LG-CPA-2-97) to Florida Department of Community -Affairs, that
would add a vision statement and goals, objectives and policies in the Comprehensive Plan.
PURPOSE: the contents of the plan amendment are intended to add to the current text of the Land
Use Element in Volume 2 of2 the S.R. 434 Corridor Vision Plan Vision Statement, and associated
goals, objectives, and policies. The additional language to the text requires the submission of a large
scale comprehensive plan amendment to the Florida Department of Community Affairs:
Mr. Carrington gave his presentation.
e
Mayor Partyka asked if there was any public comment. There was no public comment.
Commissioner GennelI stated that she hopes the Commission revisits the issue of widening the 5 foot
sidewalks.
Motion was made by Commissioner Gennell to approve agenda Item D. Seconded by
Commissioner McLeod. Discussion. Vote: Commissioner McLeod: aye; Commissioner Miller;
aye; Commissioner Blake: aye; Commissioner Martinez: aye. Commissioner Gennell: aye.
Motion passes
Community Development Department/Land Development Division
E. Requesting Commission action on a request by Donald W. McIntosh, on behalf of Wagner
Station Planned Unit Development, to waive certain requirements of Section 9-157 of the Code
which provides design/construction and inspection standards established for private streets.
PURPOSE: for Commission action on a request by Donald W. McIntosh, on behalf of Wagner
Station Planned Unit Development, to waive the Code to allow sidewalks meandering in and out of
fa
lv/INurES
PLANNL'lG AND ZONL~G BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
MA1~CH 18, 1998 - REGULAR MEETING
I. Call To Order
Pledge Of Allegiance
The Planning and Zoning BoarcI/Local Planning Agency meeting was called to order
Wednesday, March 18, 1998 at 7:00 p.m. by Chainnan Bill Fernandez in the Commission
Chambers of the Municipal Building (City Hall, 1126 East State Road 434, Winter
Springs, Florida 32708). The Pledge of Allegiance followed.
Roll Call
Bill Fernandez, Chairman, present
Tom Brown, Vice Chairman, present
Gene Lein, present
Carl Stephens, present
Rosanne Karr, present
Also Present
Tom GrinuTIS, AlCP, Comprehensive Planning/Zoning Coordinator
Approval Of The March 4, 1998 PlanniDl! & Zoning BoardfLPA
Regular Meeting Minutes
Vice-Chairman Tom Brown commented on the "Future Agenda Items" part of the
minutes, and that the items mentioned in the minutes were not on tonight's Agenda.
Specifically, Vice Chainnan Brown was quite concerned about the By-laws and the
timeliness of the review of the E.A.R Chainnan Fernandez also addressed this issue
as to who has the responsibility for preparing the Agenda.
Motion by Tom Brown. Seconded by Rosanne Karr. Discussion. Tom Grfmms
AICP, Comprehensive PlanningfZoning Coor:dinator ~~.dr~sed the Board's concern
with the tiinelines ,of the ';E.A.R It was agreed that the motion to adopt the minutes
of March 4, 1998 would be by consensus of the Board. ' The minutes were adopted
by consensus.
IT. Regular Agenda
>
A.
Amendment to the Intergovernmental Coordination Element-
Volume 2 of2 (LG-CPA-I-98)
.
I,
~
t
E
Tom Grimms, AlCP, Comprehensive Planning/Zoning Coordinator addressed the Board
with Staffs findings regarding tltis agenda item.
,
,
L
t
,
MINUTES
I'LANNING.'i< ZONING IJOARD/LPA
REGULAR MEETING - MARCI'I 18,1998
f'AGE20f7
Board Member Gene Lein mentioned that he wanted clarification on a couple of items.
The first being Roman Numeral II B - Changes to Volume 2 of 2 City of Winter Springs
Comprehensive Plan 1990-2010, the Land Use Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies;
stating that "The paragraph under the note, it says, the City of Winter Springs shall not
through an involuntary annexation extend its eastern boundary beyond the Urban Service
Line separating urban land uses from that area known as the East Rural Area as further
defined in Figure 2.8 of the Seminole County Comprehensive Plan". Then he added,
"That...I have to go back a little bit to the time that this came up to the Commission
Meeting about the Battle Ridge Area, and one of the proposals made at that time, was just
this...in other words, we will noL.once we settle the Battle Ridge area, we will not go
past that line, etc., etc...and that's what was said that night, and as far as I can recalL.that
was the only thing that Was said, and that was.:.it was discussed, and it was, probably
maybe part of the reason the decision was made to go ahead with the vote, and so on, and
so forth".
"But, I want to go down to the next sentence in this paragraph; the City reserves the right
to annex properties upon voluntary request of property owners beyond the Urban Services
established...Service Line established in the County. I haven't heard anything like that
before. This is the first time I've heard of it. It was never mentioned that night in the
Commission meeting. The public was never told about it. That's the one...that's the...let
me get both of these first, OK. That was the one confusing point I have. The second one
is, I have in front of me here, the March 23rd Commission Meeting Agenda, and on
Regular Agenda Items...which is next Monday...right?...on Community Development
Department/Planning Division...it's says "D" - Request the Conunission to hold a Public
Hearing and consider whether, to tran~mit the Large Sca1e...that's exactly what I'm talking
about - Volume 2 of 2, Comprehensive Plan...that's...whatever is probably going to be
discussed here tonight. Also, "F", under the City Manager, requesting the Commission to
adopt Resolution 843, providing for an effective date of Ordinance 694 Battle Ridge
Annexation Ordinan~, apd the Battle ,Ridge Development Agreement staff has
transmitted to Battle Ridge, affairs. '. ,Purpose: to provide an instrument for which the
effective date:.:it references an Ordinance...can be formally coordinated on a local map.
Now this information is being...was put on the agenda for next Monday night, states
nothing about that second...sentence in that paragraph that read...off the...the paper that
we received in our Agenda tonight about the...City shall reserve the right to annex
properties of involuntary request of property owners beyond the Urban Service Line. I'm
a little bit confused?" Mr. Grimms addressed Board Member Lein's concern, and Board
Member Lein asked "Where did that second sentence come from"? Mr. Grimms replied
that "In drafting it, our staff..made the distinction between involuntary annexation and a
voluntary annexation. We feel that in such cases of voluntary annexation, where a
property owner petitions a city to request annexation, that if you see the Land-Use
designations, the City would...establish onc of these designations that are compatible with
lanel-use dcsignations that the Coullty's COl11prehensive Plan has already designated for
COMMISSION AGENDA
ITEM G
Consent
Informational
Public Hearing X
Regular
April 10, 2000
Meeting
j~
,
Mgr. / Dept.
Authorization
REQUEST:
The Community Development Department - Planning Division requests the City Commission
hold a public hearing for first reading and consideration of Ordinance 2000-12 to adopt the large
scale comprehensive plan amendment (LG-CP A-I-97) that would update the Traffic Circulation
Element in Volwne 1 and 2 of the City's Comprehensive Plan.
PURPOSE:
The City needs to update the Traffic Circulation Element based on the results of the recently
completed City of Winter Springs Transportation Study prepared by CPH Engineering, Inc. The
contents of the Study are intended to replace completely the current text and maps in the Traffic
Circulation Element Volume 1 of2 and Volwne 2 of2. The preparation of Supplement #1
prepared December, 1999 is necessary because the Town Center Concept has been adopted since
the Study was completed.
APPLICABLE LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY:
The provisions of 163.3184(15)(b) F.S. which state: "The local governing body shall hold at
least one advertised public hearing on the proposed comprehensive plan or plan amendment as
follows:
CDD/ApriIS, 2000/11:47 AM
APRIL 10,2000
PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM G
Page 2
1. The first public hearing shall be held at the transmittal stage pursuant to
subsection (3). It shall be held on a weekday at least 7 days after the day that the
advertisement is published.
2. The second public hearing shall be held at the adoption stage pursuant to
subsection (7). It shall be held on a weekday at least 5 days after the day that the
second advertisement is published."
CONSIDERATIONS:
· The City Commission approved the City of Winter Springs Transportation Study in
1997.
· The City needs to update the Traffic Circulation Element based on the results of the City
of Winter Springs Transportation Study prepared by CPH Engineering, Inc. The contents
of the Study are intended to replace completely the current text and maps in the Traffic
Circulation Element Volume 1 of2 and Volume 2 of2. The preparation of Supplement
#1 prepared December, 1999 is necessary because the Town Center Concept has been
adopted since the Study was completed.
· The specific changes relate to new data such as traffic counts on roads that reflect the
new residential developments built since the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan, on
April 27, 1992, and the inclusion of a collector road system in the Town Center. It is
necessary to adopt this proposed large scale comprehensive plan amendment
(LG-CPA-I-97) to include the new data involving text and maps into Volume I of2 and
Volume 2 of 2 of the Comprehensive Plan.
· It was necessary to prepare Supplement #1, since the Town Center Concept and
additional new data was adopted since the study was completed in August, 1997.
· The Planning & Zoning Board, at its March 22, 2000 meeting, recommended that the
City Commission adopt the Traffic Circulation Update large scale comprehensive plan
amendment (LG-CP A-1-97) incorporating the response to the ORC Report and
Supplement # 1 to the City of Winter Springs Transportation Study, August, 1997.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
rnn/Annl ~ 71\(\()/I1'117 A~A
APRIL 10,2000
PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM G
Page 3
FINDINGS:
· A number of changes have occurred since the preparation and adoption (on April 27,
1992) of the City's Comprehensive Plan, prompting the need for an update of the
Traffic Circulation Element.
· The City Commission hired CPH Engineering, Inc. to update the Traffic Circulation
Element on November 13, 1995.
· The Florida Department of Community Affairs sent an ORC Report on the plan
amendment and the City's consultant, CPH Engineering, Inc. has prepared the
response (see Attachment B).
· The comprehensive plan amendment is compatible with the other elements of the
City's Comprehensive Plan
· The comprehensive plan amendment is compatible with and furthers the elements of
the State Comprehensive Plan, in Chapter 187 F.S.
· The comprehensive plan amendment is compatible with and furthers the elements of
the East Central Florida Comprehensive Regional Policy Plan.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Commission hold a public hearing for first reading and
consideration of Ordinance 2000-12 to adopt the large scale comprehensive plan
amendment (LG-CPA-I-97) updating the Traffic Circulation Element.
IMPLEMENTA TION SCHEDULE:
The ordinance would take effect upon notification by DCA in its "Notice of Intent" to
find the comprehensive plan amendment consistent with the State Comprehensive Plan,
the Regional Policy Plan, and the City's Comprehensive Plan, approximately June 14,
2000.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Ordinance 2000-12
B. ORC Report and Response.
rnn/A",-;l ~ '(){)()/11'<l.7 ^ M
APRIL 10, 2000
PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM G
Page 4
C. Traffic Circulation Update Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Transmittal to
DCA.
D. Supplement #1.
COMMISSION ACTION:
rnn/hnn\ , 1f1Nl1l hI? h~A
.'
,,- . .~.: '.~'. .
ATTACHMENT A
ORDINANCE 2000-12
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS,
SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, ADOPTING A LARGE
SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT UPDATE
THE TRAFFIC CmCULATION ELEMENT VOLUME 1 OF 2
AND VOLUME 2 OF 2 BY COMPLETELY REPLACING ALL
TEXT AND MAPS; PURSUANT TO 166.041 FLORIDA
STATUTES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; CONFLICTS
AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, The City needs to update the Traffic Circulation Element based on the
results of the recently completed City of Winter Springs Transportation Study prepared by
Conklin, Porter & Holmes. The contents of the Study are intended to replace completely the
current text and maps in the Traffic Circulation Element Volume 1 of2 and Volume 2 of2.
Due to the Town Center Concept that was adopted since the study was completed necessitated
the preparation of Supplement #1 prepared December, 1999.
WHEREAS, due to the Town Center Concept that was adopted since The City
of Winter Springs Transportation Study. August.. 1997, the preparation of Supplement
# 1 was necessary and was prepared December, 1999.
WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Board at its March 22, 2000 meeting
reviewed the proposed update to the Traffic Circulation Element as indicated in the
draft 6/1/99
City of Winter Springs Transportation Study, August, 1997 and Supplement # 1 to the
Study and recommended that the City Commission adopt the Traffic Circulation
Update large scale comprehensive plan amendment (LG-CPA-I-97) incorporating the
response to the ORC Report and Supplement # 1
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY TIffi CITY COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF WlNTER SPRINGS, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS
FOLLOWS: The City Commission hereby amends the City of Winter Springs
Comprehensive Plan Traffic Circulation Element Volume 1 of 2 and Volume 2 of 2 to
include the following text and maps that completely replacing the existing text and
maps of the Traffic Circulation Element Volume 1 of 2 and Volume 2 of 2. As
indicated in Exhibit "A" of this Ordinance.
Section 1- Recitals: The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are fully
incorporated herein by this reference.
Section 2 - Purpose and Intent: It is hereby declared to be the purpose and
intent of this Ordinance to update the City's Comprehensive Plan by completely
replacing the existing text and maps of the Traffic Circulation Element Volume 1 of 2
and Volume 2 of 2. As indicated in Exhibit "A" of this Ordinance.
2
draft 6/1/99
Section 3 - Repeal of Prior Inconsistent Ordinances and Resolutions:
All prior inconsistent ordinances and resolutions adopted by the City Commission, or
parts of ordinances and resolutions in conflict herewith, are hereby repealed to the
extent of the conflict.
Section 4 - Severability:
If any section, subsection sentence, clause, phrase,
word or provision of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by
any court of competent jurisdiction, whether for substantive, procedural, or any other
reason, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision,
and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this
ordinance.
Section 5 - Effective Date: The effective This Ordinance shall take effect upon
notice by the Florida Department of Community Affairs of its "Notice of Intent" to
fmd the plan amendment consistent with the State Comprehensive Plan, the Regional
Policy Plan, and the City's Comprehensive Plan.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this_day of
CITY OF WlNTER SPRINGS
,2000
PAUL P. PARTYKA, MAYOR
3
draft 6/1/99
A TIEST:
ANDREA LORENZO-LUACES
CITY CLERK
1ST READING
POSTED
2ND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING
4
draft 6/1/99
OBJECTIONS, n,F.:COMMENDATIONS AND COivII\1ENTS
pOR
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
AMENDMENT 98-1
1. The following objection and comments are raised to amendment LG-CP A-l-97
proposing to replace in its entirety, the Traffic Circulation Element text and goals,
objectives and policies.
a. Objection: The proposed improvements as shown on Tables 14 and 15 and Figures 7 and 8,
to S.R. 434 from C.R. 419 to the Eastern Beltway and S.R. 419 from U.S. 17-92 to S.R. 434 have
not been included, in the FDOT's five year work program, and thus should not be relied upon as
committed improvements within the 2010 timeframe. In addition, the suggested eight-Ianing of
U.S. 17-92 is not consistent with the FDOT maximum lane standards which sets the maximum
number of lanes for state arterials at six lanes.
Section 163.3177(2), (6)(b), (6)(h), (6)G), and (8), and 163.3180, Florida Statutes (F.S.); and
Rule 9J-5.005(2), Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.)
Recommendation: The City should revise the proposed amendment so that the element clearly
indicates that these improvements are conceptual and for planning purposes only. The element
should explicitly indicate that these improvements are not funded and may not be considered as
committed improvements (e.g., for the purposes of determining concurrency or issuing building
permits). The City should also consider developing policies which promote other alternatives
such as parallel improvements, transportation demand management or transportation system
management measures, or other mobility mechanisms to reduce the congestion on these arterials.
The proposed eight-Ianing of U.S. 17-92 should be revised to be coordinated and consistent with
the FDOT policy of a maximum of six lanes.
b. Objection: The proposed amendment does not demonstrate consistency with
Intergovernmental Coordination Element Objective A and associated policies regarding
coordination with the scheduled improvements of all jurisdictions whose transportation
responsibilities within the City limits affec~ the City, and Objective F and associate policies
regarding coordination with the plans of the Department of Transportation and the MPO.
Section 163.3177(2), (8), (9)(b) and (9)(h), F.S.; and Rules 9J-5.005(5) and 9J-5.015(3)(b) and
(c), F.A.C.
Recommendation: The City should revise the proposed amendment to clearly demonstrate that
the proposed amendment is coordinated with the schedules of improvements of the Florida
Department of Transportation and Seminole County and that proposed improvements are
consistent with the plans of those entities,
c. COlli men I: The proposed signalization of both Moss Road and Edgemon Ave, at S,R. 419,
may generate safety and operational concerns that would have to be mitigated where a warrant
could be issued by the FOOT. The City should consider other alternatives to manage access at
these intersections,
d. Comment: The City should be advised that the Rule 9J-5.007, F.A.C., provisions regarding
the Traffic Circulation Element were repealed effective 2/20/96. The City is now required to
adopt a new Transportation Element pursuant to the requirements of Section 163.3177(6)0), F.S.
and Rule 91-5.019, F.A.C., during the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) based amendment
process. The City's EAR should consider what changes to the Traffic Circulation Element would
be necessary to address the new rule and statutory requirements.
e. Comment: The City should revise the proposed element to include a list of tables, maps and
figures included within the element and revise all tables, maps and figures to include sources for
the data.
2. The following objection is raised to amendment LG-CPA-2-97 proposing to amend the
text of the Future Land Use Element to incorporate the "State Road 434 Corridor Vision
Plan" vision statement and goals, objectives and policies.
a. Objection: The City did not provide data and analysis supporting the proposed goals,
objectives and policies.
Section 163.3177(6)(a) and (8), F.S.; and Rules 91-5.005(2), and 9J-5.006(1), (2), (3), and (4),
F.A~C.
Recommendation: Provide data and analysis in support of the proposed amendment. Data and
analysis may detail the concepts the City wishes to encourage, maps depicting the areas affected
by the proposed amendment, a description of the current conditions, needs and desired future
conditions based on the results of the public participation and workshops held to develop the
proposed amendment. The City should use the best available existing data.
3. The following objections are raised to amendment LG-CP A-3-97 proposing to create a
new Future Land Use Category: Greenway Interchange District and re-designate 250 acres
currently designated as Mixed-use and <;:onservation.
3. Obiection: The amendment does not indicate how many acres of Conservation and Mixed-use
designated land will be changed to the new designation nor was a revised future land use map
that depicts the new land use submitted for review.
Section 163.3177(6)(a), F.S, and Rule 9J-5.005(2), and 9J-5.006(4)(a), F.A.C.
Recommendation: Revise the amendment to indicate the acreage of the current land uses and
the proposed land uses based on the results of the analyses recommended below, Provide a
future land use map tlwt depicts the nGw land uses. Those lands that are currently designated as
Conservation should retain that c!Lsignation,
")
c. COllllllen!: The proposed signellizeltion of both Moss Road and Edgemon Ave, at S,R, 419,
lllay generate selfety and operational concerns that would have to be mitigeltecl where a warrant
could be issued by the FOOT The City should consider other 8!tern8tives to m8I18ge 8ccess at
these intersections,
d. Comment: The City should be advised that the Rule 9J-5.007, F.A.C., provisions regarding
the Traffic Circulation Element were repealed effective 2/20/96. The City is now required to
adopt a new Transportation Element pursuant to the requirements of Section 163.3177(6)0), F .S.
and Rule 91-5.019, F.A.C., during the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) based amendment
process. The City's EAR should consider what changes to the Traffic Circulation Element would
be necessary to address the new rule and statutory requirements.
.c. Comment: The City should revise the proposed element to include a list of tables, maps and
figures included within the element and revise all tables, maps and figures to include sources for
the data.
CONKLIN, PORTER AND I-lOLlVIES ENGINE.ERS, INC.
1117 EAST ROmNSON STREET, SUITE C
ORLANDO, FL 32801
TEL 407 -425-0452 FAX 407 -648-1036
FAX TRANSMISSION
To:
Tom Grimms
Date: August 11, 1998
Company;. City of Winter Springs
Fax #:
327-6912
Pages: 2, including this cover sheet.
From:
Terry M. Zaudtke, P.E.,
D. M. Foxworth, P.E.
Subject:
Traffic Study
CPH Project No.: W0459.02
COMMENTS:
Comment 1.d. of the ORC report states that new parameters are required to adopt a new
Transportation Element pursuant to the requirements of Section 163.3177(6)(j), FS and Rule 9J-
5.019, F.AC., during the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) based amendment process.
The comment filrther explains that the City's EAR should consider what changes ~o the Traffic
Circulation Element would be necessary to address the new nile and statutory requirements.
Based on this comment, we do not believe that the August 1997, City of Winter Springs
Transportation Study needs to be modified at this time. These items could be addressed in the next
year and we recommend that you proceed with the process of adopting the Transportation Study as it
currently exists with a few minor exceptions for addressing the other ORC comments. This study fully
covers the vehicular traffic needs and will stand alone for vehicular considerations.
These new considerations would require a considerable change to the report because they require a
heavy emphasis on mass transit which is not currently contr01led by the City of Winter Springs. Mass
Transit is appropriate for the Greater Orlando area but is best addressed on a regional basis with input
by the City of Winter Springs. The City should support expanded mass transit on US 17-92, SR419,
Red Bug Lake Road and Tuskawi1la Road as we1l as car pooling with a possible park-and-ride lot at
SR434 and the Eastem Beltway which could be used by car pools and/or express buses. A regional
approach to mass transit is required as much of the traffic on the State roads and major county roads
does not stop in the City of W inter Springs. Bikeways could also help reduce local traffic along SR434
and Tuskawilla. The Cross-Seminole Trail may help with this situation.
The FOOT reviewer placed an emphasis on construction of new parallel roadways through the City.
There is no easy or cost effective solution to add parallel facilities without significantly disrupting
existing residential areas. Because Lake Jesup exists on the NOlthem boundary of the City, it
dl'cctiv~ly cuts olf any nOlih-south roadways as alternatives to the E,",prcssway or US 17/92. The City
Commission was very clear that such roadways would not be approwd, Such parallcl facilities would
illso violil[c the COills amI Ohjedives, Therel()rc, \\'C rc<,:ol11I11Clld lhatlhc City evaluate, plan and
(' ,"1'1'11, 'F \\'I'II"Jj.J'i'I':i\II'I.:\TI,:,,'I'IIF<::'/(i\IS '('( i1Ui\Ii\'IS IVI'I)
advocate transportation altelllatives.
We believe the City should emphasiz.e with the State that the Town Center concept is to provide more
services to the local population and decrease the number of outside trips. The concept provides a
mixed llse area where people can live, work and play without ex'tensive use of the automobile.
Shopping and recreation will be available right at their doorstep instead of having to travel 5 to 15
miles. It is an integrated approach to the needs of the citizens.
'..".1,:.1'1-'11 "",\\'1'\\'1" 'I'1:i\II'I.:\'I'I':', 'l'III'O::,I\i\IS 'I'(;lU,\,Ii\,I:) 11'1'1)
.,:.
ATTACHMENT C
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708
Telephone (407) 327-1800
co~nn' DEVELOPMffiNT
DIRECTOR
Aprill7, 1998
Mr. Ray Eubanks
Florida Department of Community Affairs
Bureau of Local Planning - Division of Resource Planning
Plan Processing Team
2555 Shumard Oaks Blvd.
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100
Dear Mr. Eubanks:
The City of Winter Springs submits the enClosed proposed large scale comprehensive plan
amendments to DCA and other appropriate agencies for its review, as part of its Spring
amendment cycle (first round) transmittal, per 9J-l1.006(1)(a) F.A.C
1. The Local Planning Agency held an advertised public hearing on the following enclosed
proposed plan alT).endments: [per 9J-l1.006(1)(a)l. F.A.C ]
LG-CP A-I-97
LG-CP A-2-97
LG-CPA-3-97
LG-CPA-4-97
LG-CP A-I-98
October 29, 1997
November 19, 1997
November 19, 1997
November 19, 1997
March 18, 1998
2. The City Commission of Winter Spring held an advertised public hearing on the following
enclosed proposed plan amendments: [ per 163.3184(IS)(b) 1. F. S. and
9J-l1.006(1)(a)2. F,A.C ]
LG-CPA-1-97
LG-CP A-2-97
LG-CPA-3-97
LG-CPA-4-97
LG-CPA-I-98
December 8, 1997
December 8, 1997
December 8, 1997
December 8, 1997
April 13, 1998
The City is also submitting copies of these proposed plan amendments to the following agencies
concurrently with this transmittal to DCA: [per 9J-lI.006(1)(a)2, FAC]
*
*
East Central Florida Regional Planning Council
St. Johns River Water Management District
Florida Department of Transportation
Florida Department of Environmental Protection
*
*
3. The City submits the enclosed proposed plan amendments for review by the Florida
Department of Community Affairs and other appropriate agencies. The following is a
summary of each proposed plan amendment: [ per 9J-11.006(1)(a)3. FAC ]
LG-CPA-1-97:
The City needs to update the Traffic Circulation Element based on the results of the
recently completed City of Winter Springs Transportation Study prepared by Conklin,
Porter & Holmes. The contents of the Study are intended to completely replace the
current text and maps in the Traffic Circulation Element Volume 1 of2 as well as Volume
20f2.
LG-CPA-2-97:
The contents of the plan amendment are intended to add to the current text of the Land
Use Element in Volume 2 of2 (GOPs), the "State Road 434 Corridor Vision Plan" vision
statement and associated goals, objectives, and policies. The Plan's purpose is to
recommend ways to improve the corridor between U.S. 17/92 to S.R. 417 (beltway), to
ensure that development that will occur along those presently undeveloped areas of the
corridor is done in a manner that emphasizes aesthetics, efficiency of land use, and
economic benefit to the City and its residents.
LG-CPA-3-97:
The purpose of the plan amendment is to create a new Future Land Use Map designation
"GreenWay Interchange District" that would replac~ the Mixed Use designation on the
subject property, in the Land Use Element Goals, Objectives and Policies (Volume 2 of2)."
The property would be more appropriately developed if placed in a district that is more
oriented to the type of activity generated by a major highway, such as the beltway (S.R.
417) that intersects S.R. 434 on the eastern edge of the City.
LG-CPA-4-97:
The purpose of this plan amendment is to eliminate the minimum density requirement in
residential land use categories in the Future Land Use Element Policies 1,2,3,5,6,7 under
Objective A of Goal 3, Tn Volume 2 of2, The reason is to prevent future situations
arising like that of the l-[ubert Early property wherein Mr, {-[ubert Early wanted to develop
his property according to the zoning designation of his land (RC-l - maximum 1 DU per
acre) but the "Lower Density" Future Land Use Map designation was 1.1 to 3.5 DU per
acre, He was effectively barred from developing at I DU per acre because it fell .1 acre
below the minimum density level. He filed a lawsuit and won.
LG-CPA-1-98:
The plan amendment is intended to add to the current text of the Intergovernmental
Coordination Element in Volume 2 of 2,. a policy statement on aimexation into the east
rural area of Seminole County. Consideration of this plan amendment is prompted by the
request of Seminole County ~
4. The City Commission intends to hold a second public hearing 60 days after the receipt of
the ORC Report from DCA [per 163.3184(7) F.S.] - possibly August 17, 1998, or after
clarification and resolution .of items in the ORC Report with DCA.
5. The proposed plan amendments are not in/or applicable to an area of critical state' concern.
6. The proposed plan amendments do not apply to the Wekiva River Protection Area
pursuant to Chapter 369, Part III, Florida Statutes.
7. The proposed plan amendments are not an exemption to the twice per calendar year
limitation on the adoption of comprehensive plan amendments.
8. The City has sent a copy of its complete adopted comprehensive plan including
amendments with all support documents which includes data and analyses to all of the
review agencies listed in Rules 9J-11.009(8)(a) through (h) FAC.
These copies have been sent concurrently with the transmittal to the Department of
Community Affairs.
As of the date of this letter, no other unit of local government or government agency has
filed a written request with the City for copies of the plan amendments.
9. The proposed plim amendments are not proposed to be adopted under a joint planning
agreement pursuant to 163.3171 Florida Statutes.
10. The contact person for the City concerning the proposed plan amendments is:
Thomas Grimms, AICP Comprehensive Planning/Zoning Coordinator
(407) 327-1800 X 315
Winter Springs City Hall
1126 East State Road 434
Winter Springs, FL 32708-2799
Enclosed are six (6) copies of the proposed amendments per 9J-Il.006(1)(b) F.A.C. Included
with these copies are six (6) copies of the staff report, and the minutes of the Local Planning
Agency and the City Commission recommendation per 9J-ll.006(1)(c) F.A.C.
Sincerely,
Charles Carrington, AICP
Community Development Director
cc: 1998 Plan Amendment File
Thomas Grimms, AICP Comprehensive Planning/Zoning Coordinator
Read File
ATTACHMENT B
',:'. ;.'..... .
, -
'" "
'.
ATTACHMENT B
'.", :'
"
MfNuTES
PLANNING & 7..oj\;ING nOMlDfLl'A
REGULAR MEETING - t.l:\RCII 18.1998
PAGE 4 OF 7
Mr. Grimms replied "They will see exactly what you",see in that paragraph". Board
Member Lein continued "Yeah, OK",
Mr. Grimms replied "And I'm going to urge them to...consider that as that statement
intact, as that statement".
Board Member Lein added "So, you're telling me that statement was made...by the City
Manager"?
Mr. Grimms agreed, and further added that they have not heard of any concerns from the
County regarding this subject.
Board Member Lein said "I wanted to clarify that point because...I'm still very doubtful
about the whole thing...! think it's two separate issues, and one...kind of violates the
other" .
Vice Chairman Brown asked if the introduction had been filed along with the
Comprehensive Plan, as he felt there was conflicting data, and would it be re-written?
Mr. Grimms stated "My recommendation...I've already made it to the...! guess I can tell
you...members of the Board...my recommendation to the Community Development
Director, is a very, very massive, significant overhaul to this Comprehensive Plan...needs
to be made". He added that "In the intervening period, there's been a lot of..Iot of
growth, a lot of changes...that...! think we need to re-visit this after the E.A.R. is donell.
Vice Chairman Brown added that IIWhat I'm asking you to do...! think, is put in your
findings, that you're going to either also submit a new introduction, or get rid of the
introduction that's in there, when you do modify the plan". There was further discussion
about the introduction and the historical content of it.
Vice Chairman Brown questioned Mr. Grimms about revising the introduction, and asked,
"Can you put that in your findingsll? Mr. Grimms responded, IIIf you'd like". Vice-
Chairman Brown replied "Yes, I'd Iike...that's where I'm heading". Mr. Grimms agreed to
do this, as the Board was requesting this action.
Board Member Lein commented that "All I just want to...make sure that the Clerk...Mr.
Chairman... the Clerk has my statement in there that I do not know where that line came
from...! was in attendance at that meeting - I don't recall it. I could be wrong. I don't
recall that line being said ".
I\-IINUTES
PLANNING.':: ZONING 1l0AHO/LPA
REGULAR MEETING - MARCH 18.1998
PAGE 5 OF 7
lVlotiol/; "I'd like to make a Illation thaL.the Local Planning Agency make
f'ecommcndation to thc City Commission, that the City Commission hold a first
transmittal public hearing to transmit to the Dcpartmcnt of Community Affairs the
proposed Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment (LG-CPA-98) to add to the
City's Comprehensive Plan, Intergovernmental Coordination Element _ Volume 2 of
2 of the City's Comprehensive Plan, a policy statement on Annexation into the East
Rural Area of Seminole County, as described in this staff report and include in the
findings the introduction of Volume 2 of 2 of the Comprehensive Plan will be
reviewed and amended as per the City Commission...the City". The motion was
amended to substitute (LG-CPA-1-98) instead of (LG-CPA-98), and to attach
Figure 2.8 of the Seminole Comprehensive Plan for transmittal. Discussion.
Motion by Brown. Seconded by Stephens. Discussion. Vote: Lein: nay; Stephens:
aye; Brown: aye; Karr: aye; Fernandez: aye. Motion passed.
Mr. Grimms stated "A couple of members seem a little bit troubled about...this thing
of ..the City reserves a right to accept...voluntary annexations...east of the Urban Service
Line. Well, even when a property owner wants...you know, if he approaches the
City...wants to be annexed in...you know, I think that's a reasonable consideration on the
part of the City to...consider his request for annexation. Now, beyond the Urban Service
Line Boundary...that would mean the City could annex the property...but, will not provide
the sewer and water services".
Chairman Fernandez added that there still seems to be discrepancies in the City's speed
limits, the State's speed limits, and school zone speed limits, in regards to the Traffic
Circulation Map. '
Mr. Grimms stated to the Board, "I would like to...request the Board to...give
me...authority to appear before the March 23rd meeting of the City Commission, and...so
verifY that...or...that....you have recommended that the City Commission transmit this
proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment to DCA for their review and comment".
Chairman Fernandez addressed the Board regarding Mr. Grimms' request and said "That
he be allowed to present, what we've just passed, to the City Commission recommending
transmittal, without having to wait until we get our min'utes back and approve them at our
next meeting. Board member Lein asked "Wili the City get our minutes? Will the
Commissioners get our minutes"? Mr. Grimms replied that the City Commission always
receives the Planning and Zoning BoardILocal Planning Agency minutes, but because the
minutes would probably not be completed by the City Clerk's office, (before the next
Commission Meeting which is scheduled for Monday, March 23, 1998), the City
Commission may not see the minutes from tonight's meeting. There was further
discussion regarding the transmittal of the minutes. Board Member Lein added that "They
MINUTES
PLANNING ,.... ZONING nOAfW/L,,^
REGULARMEETING-I..IMCH 18.1998
PAGEGOF7
will have no idea..,even my second comment saying...to make sure...well, there's
something wrong here then Tom. We have to transmit something to the Commission, that
we looked at...and one member of the Board up here found something strange".
Discussion,
Mr. Grimms stated "I will so note that...as...an addition into the findings of this report,
when they get it, OK"?
Vice Chairman Brown then spoke about Board Member Lein attending most of the
Commission Meetings, and he said that "I'd like to give him (Board Member Lein)
authority of the...of us...give him authority to...to relay to the Commission...my
comments..J'm sure Tom's going to pick them up...or to relay to the Commission that
with official authority from the Planning and Zoning Board of that comment".
Board Member Lein said "This is a very brief meeting tonight. We've finished the
agenda...! understand...already. Is there any reason why these minutes couldn't be put in a
rough draft and given to the Commission by Monday night"? He further added, "There's
no reason...I...this is a short meeting...there's no reason why they can't get this information
- whether it's a rough draft, or it's the minutes that we'll eventually see later on".
Chairman Fernandez brought up to the Board that "It's already on the Agenda, so we've
got to ,give him permission to allow him to, present it to the City Commission for
transmittal hearing, without our formal approval of the minutes, with the understanding
that the Clerk will geL.either a rough draft, or our un-approved minutes to the
Commission, in advance of Monday's meeting".
It was agreed by consensus of the Board to accept Chainnan Fernandez' comment
in regards to Mr. Grimms' previous request.
Vice Chairman Brown commented on annexation issues, and there was discussion
regarding this subject. Mr. Grimms pointed to some of the discussed areas in question on
an "Overlapping Future Annexation Areas" Map.
ID. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Chairman Fernandez reminded everyone that any Board Member can suggest something to
be considered as a Future Agenda Item. He (and other Board Members) also stated that
they did not recall that any specific items had in fact been requested to be scheduled for
tonight's agenda. There was further discussion regarding the City Attorneys' opinions and
comments pertaining to the By-laws. The Board Members were asked if everyone had the
10-15-97 copy; Board Member Rosanne Karr asked for this version.
....~
'"
,,~..
Commission Agenda Action\Items
Aoril13, 1998
Community Development DepartmentJPlanning Division
C. Requests the City Commission hold a Public Hearing t consider whether to transmit
the large scale comprehensive plan amendment (LG-CP A-1-98) to Florida Department of
Community Affairs, that would add a policy statement in the Intergovernmental
Coordination element of the City's Comprehensive Plan on annexation into the eas't rural
area of Seminole County. PURPOSE: the plan amendment is intended to add to the
current text of the Intergovernmental Coordination element, in Volume 2 of 2 of the
Comprehensive Plan, a policy statement on annexation into the east rural area of Seminole
County. Consideration of this plan amendment is prompted by the request of Seminole
County, The additional language to the text requires the submission of a Large Scale
Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Florida Department of Community Affairs. THIS
ITEM TABLED FROM THE MARCH 23, 1998 MEETING.
ACTION: Charles Carrington, Community Development Director, gave his presentation.
Tony Matthews, from Seminole County, spoke regarding this item.
David Moon, from the City of Oviedo, gave the Commission a letter from Oviedo
Chairman Robert Dallari.
Discussion on Item C.
Motion was made by Commissioner McLeod to approve Item C. Seconded by
Commissioner Blake. Discussion. Vote: Commissioners Blake, Martinez and
McLeod: aye; Commissioners Gennell and Miller: nay. Motion passes.
Community Development DepartmentJPlanning Division
D. Requests the City Commission hold ~ First Public Hearing and approve for adoption
Ordinance 699 to revise Ordinance No. 695 to redesignate the jurisdictional wetlands for
the Battle Ridge Property from "Lower Density Residential" to "Conservation" on the
Future Land Use Map. PURPOSE: to request the Commission hold a First Public Hearing
8
Not es:
MINUTES
PLANNING &. ZONING BOAJ{O/LPi\
REGULAR MEETING - MARCil 18,1998
PAGE) 01'7
that property".
Mr. Grimms also added, "The City Manager...and I certainly feel the same way, that the
fact...L..I've urged Charles (Carrington), and I've mentioned to the City
Manager...that...don't have the City adopt any policy...that straps uS...that makes
commitments on our part, and leaves a free hand for Oviedo...if..you know, if the
community out there wants protection, they should request the City...oLWinter Springs
to adopt this policy, as well as the City of Oviedo. Now L.in my observing...of..the
proceedings of that night...January 26, 1998 City Commission Meeting...! found...! believe
I heard our City Manager, at that meeting, say that the City of Winter Springs is quite
willing to adopt such a policy of not annexing involuntary annexations, providing urban
services, beyond the Urban Service Boundary established by the County's Comprehensive
Plan, eastward and northward into the East Rural Area, provided the City of Winter
Springs...the City of Oviedo does also. We heard no tendering of thinking that 'way, no
commitment, no indication that...they would take the same approach...at our council, and
propose that too, on the part of the City of Oviedo. The City of Oviedo had a Chairman
of their Conunission, Mr~ DaLarie there, that's why I was there, and the City's Planning
Director, Mr. Dave Moon there; and we didn't hear anything...any representations to that
effect, or their willingness to tender that...consider it on the part of the City of Oviedo".
Board Member Lein further stated, "I'm not opposed to annexation...I'm the one to try and
push annexation...!'m just trying...only trying to state what I heard, and I don't have the
minutes from the Conunissioner's meeting, and to be perfectly honest with you, sitting in
the audience that night - this was one of the reaSOns why...the vote probably went the way
it did; becallse,they were going to establish a line that wouldn't be crossed...and...! never
heard the statement about reserving rights...matter of fact, a statement...I'm pretty
sure...you'd have to check the minutes...because about a year or so ago, there we~e three
properties that came before us on the other side of the Urban Line.:.right?...requesting,
~exation.,:.then theY' just kind of went away. It probably was even mentioned that
Commission night, that:..these three properties were out of luck...kind of ..and r don't
know if those are the words that we used, that wouldn't be able to...annex themselves into
Winter Springs. But yet when r read this today, or the other day, I'm wondering where it
came from, and then when you try to match it up with the agenda that the Commissioners
get, they're not going to get that verbiage in there".
Mr. Grimms replied "Oh, yes they will. They're going to see...(what is in your Agenda
packet as the Staff report)".
Board Member Lein continued "Yeah, but...it's...they're going to get the verbiage in there,
but.. .I'd have to assume they'd understand and see that there are two different items, right?
One that we will stop at the Urban Line, and one will go over the Urban Line",
---~
.
t~
~~
COMMISSION AGENDA
ITEM A
REGULAR X
CONSENT
INFORMATIONAL
December 8. 1997
Meeting
MGR.
Authorizatio
REQUEST: The Community Development Department - Planning Division requests the City
Commission hold a public hearing to consider whether to transmit the large scale
comprehensive plan amendment (LG-CP A-I-97) to the Florida Department of
Community Affairs, to update the Traffic Circulation Element in Volume 1 and 2
of the Comprehensive Plan.
PURPOSE:
The City needs to ~pdate the Traffic Circulation Element based on the results of the
recently completed City of Winter Springs Transportation Study prepared by Conklin,
Porter & Holmes. The contents of the Study are intended to replace completely the
current text and maps in the Traffic Circulation Element Volume 1 of2 and Volume 2 of
2. The changes in the text require the submission of a large scale comprehensive plan
amendment to the Florida Department of Community Affairs.
APPLICABLE LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY:
The provisions of 163.3184(3)(a) F.S. which state: "Each local governing body shall
transmit the complete proposed comprehensive plan or plan amendment to the state land
planning agency, the appropriate regional planning council and water management district,
the department, and the Department of Transportation immediately following a public
hearing pursuant to subsection (15) as specified in the state land planning agency's
procedural rules. The local governing body shall also transmit a copy of the complete
proposed comprehensive plan or plan amendment to any other unit of local government or
government agency in the state that has filed a written request with the governing body for
the plan or plan amendment."
,. .~.~.
DECElv1BER 8, 1997
AGENDA ITEM A
Page 2
The provisions of 163.3184(15)(b) F.S. which state: "The local governing body shall hold
at least one advertised public hearing on the proposed comprehensive plan or plan
amendment as follows:
1. The first public hearing shall be held at the transmittal stage pursuant to
subsection (3). It shall be held on a weekday at least 7 days after the day
that the advertisement is published.
2. The second public hearing shall be held at the adoption stage pursuant to
subsection (7). It shall be held on a weekday at least 5 days after the day
that the second advertisement is published."
.
The provisions of9J-11.006(1) F.A.C. which state "Each proposed amendment including
applicable supporting documents which include data and analyses shall be submitted
directly to the Florida Department of Community Affairs, Division of Resource Planning
and Management, Plan Processing Team, the appropriate regional planning council, water
management district(s), Department of Transportation and Department of Environmental
Protection. Proposed plan amendments, except those discussed under the exemption
provisions of Rule 9J-l1.006(1)(a)7. F.A.C., shall be consolidated into a single submission
for each of the two plan amendments adoption times during the calendar year. The
comprehensive plan submitted pursuant to Section 163.3167 F.S., shall be counted as one
of the two plan amendment adoption times during the calendar year; however, only the
submittal requirements of Rule 9J-11.004 F.A.C. must be followed."
CHRONOLOGY:
*
The City ofWmter Springs Comprehensive Plan was adopted on April 27, 1992.
*
The City Corrunission on November 13, 1995, hired Conklin, Porter & Holmes to
prepare update of the Traffic Circulation Element in the City's Comprehensive
Plan.
*
The Local Planning Agency, at its October 29, 1997 meeting, voted to recommend
that the City Commission transmit the large scale comprehensive plan amendment
(LG-CP A-I-97) to the Florida Department of Community Affairs, based on the
findings by the City as submitted to the LP A.
A
~
DECEMBER 8, 1997
AGENDA ITEM A
Page 3
CONSIDERATIONS:
1. The City needs to update the Traffic Circulation Element based on the results of
the recently completed City of Winter Springs Transportation Study prepared by
Conklin, Porter & Holmes.
2. The contents of the Study are intended to replace completely the current text and
maps in the Traffic Circulation Element Volume I of2 and Volume 2 of2. The
changes in the text require the submission of a large scale comprehensive plan
amendment to the Florida Department of Community Affairs.
FUNDING:
The City paid Conklin, Porter & Holmes for the update of the Traffic circulation Element
from the Transportation Impact Fee.
e
No funds required to transmit the large scale comprehensive plan amendment to the
Florida Department of Community Affairs.
FlNDINGS:
*
.A number of changes have occurred since the preparation and adoption (on Aprii
27, 1992) of the City's Comprehensive Plan, prompting the need for an update of
the Traffic Circulation Element.
*
City Conunission hired Conklin, Porter Holmes to update the Traffic Circulation
Element.
*
The City initiated comprehensive plan amendment (LG-CP A- I -97) updates the
Traffic Circulation Element's Data, Inventory & Analysis (Volume I of2) and the
Goals, Objectives and Policies (Volume 2 of2). These changes are compatible
with the other elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan.
*
The City initiated comprehensive plan amendment (LG-CP A-I-97) is compatible
with and furthers goals and policies of the State Comprehensive Plan in Chapter
187 [<,5,
@
DECEMBER 8, 1997
AGENDA ITEM A
Page 4
*
The City initiated comprehensive plan amendment (LG-CP A-1-97) is compatible
with and furthers goals and policies of the East Central Florida Comprehensive
Regional Policy Plan,
RECOMMENDATION:
The Local Planning Agency, at its October 29, 1997 meeting, voted to recommend that
the City Commission transmit the large scale comprehensive plan amendment
(LG-CP A-1-97) to the Florida Department of Community Affairs f~r its review and
conunent, based on the findings by the City as submitted to the LP A.
Staff recommends that the Commission transmit (LG-CP A-1-97) to update the Traffic
Circulation Element in Volume 1 and 2 of the Comprehensive Plan to the Florida
Department of Community Affairs, based on:
e
1. The findings indicated above;
2.
The recommendation of the Local Planing Agency that the City Commission hold a
first (transmittal) public hearing and transmit to the Department of Community
Affairs the proposed large scale comprehensive plan amendment (LG-CPA-I-97).
IMPLEMENTATION:
The City Commission would hold a second public hearing within sixty (60) days to adopt
the amendment, or adopt the amendment with changes per 163.3184(7) F.S. Within forty-
five (45) days from adoption, the Department of Community Affairs publishes a "Notice
of Intent" to find the plan amendment in compliance or not in compliance per
163.3184(8)(b) F.S. An "affected person" may file a petition, which petition shall receive
a hearing by the Division of Administrative Hearings of the Flo'rida Department of
Management Services.
A TfACHM:ENTS:
1. Staff Report
2. City of Winter Springs Transportation Study - August, 1997 prepared by Conklin,
Porter & Holmes.
9
COMMISSION ACTION:
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32708.2799
Telephone (407) 327-1000
Community Development Dept.
Planning Division
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD I LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
AGENDA ITEM
II A. UPDATED TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ELEMENT (VOLUME IOF
1 AND 2 OF 2) LARGE SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AMENDMENT TRANSMITTAL (LG-CP A-I-97)
STAFF REPORT:
NOTE:
The Local Planning Agency (LPA) at its March 22,2000 meeting reviewed the
proposed Update of the Traffic Circulation Element large scale comprehensive
plan amendment along with the addition (Supplement #10 [LG-CPA-1-97] and
recommended to the City Commission adoption of the proposed amendment at a
second (adoption) public hearing.
The City Attorney concerned about potential procedural difficulties (the time
period between initial review by the Local Planning Agency, the ORC Report,
and the second public hearing by the City Commission), has recommended
commencing the plan amendment process again.
..
Since the LPA has recommended transmittal previously, and recommended
adoption by the Commission recently, and the staff has no further comment, the
staff recommends the LP A make the same recommendation it did previously to
the City Commission:
That the City Commission hold a first (transmittal) public hearing
and transmit to the Department of Community Affairs the proposed
large scale comprehensive plan amendment (LG-CPA-1-97),
updating the Traffic Circulation Element in Volume 1 of2 and
2 of2 of the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Staff will ask DCA for an expedited review since it was reviewed already with a resultant ORC
Report issued to the City,
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLor~IDA
112G EAST STATE ROAD "3~
WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32700.27<)<)
Tclcphonc ("0"1) 32'/.1000
Community Development Dep\.
Planning Division
LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY REGULAR AGENDA ITEM:
II. B.
FURTHER REVISIONS TO THE CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AMENDMENT TO THE TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ELEMENT
SUBSTITUTING CITY'S TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR ALL TEXT
AND MAPS IN VOLUME I AND TI. (LG-CPA-1-97)
STAFF REPORT:
APPLICABLE LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY:
The provisions of 163,3174(4) Florida Statutes which states "Be the agency (Local
Planning Agency) responsible for the preparation of the comprehensive plan or plan
amendment and shall make recommendations to the governing body regarding the
adoption or amendment of such plan. During the preparation of the plan or plan
amendment and prior to any recommendation to the governing body, the Local Planning
Agency shall hold at least one public hearing, with public notice, on proposed plan or plan
amendment. "
The provisions of Sec. 2-57 of the City Code which state in pact ". . . the planning and
zoning board shall serve as the local planning agency pursuant to the county
comprehensive planning act and the local government comprehensive planning act of the
state. . ,"
The provisions of 163.3] 87 F.S. which state in part "Small scale development amendments
adopted pursuant to the paragraph (1)(c) require only one public hearing before the
governing board, which shall be an adoption hearing, , ,Small scale development
amendments shall not become effective until 31 days after adoption,"
March I. 2000
SUpplclllClIllO I..CJ.CI'^-1-97
1. BACKGROUND:
APPLICANT:
City of Winter Springs
1126 East S,R, 434
Winter Springs, FL 32708
(407) 327-]800
REQUEST:
For the local Planning Agency to review and recommend additional requested ,changes to
the City's Comprehensive Plan Traffic Circulation Element Data,Inventory & Analysis
section and Goals, Objectives and Policies section. As indicated in SUPPLEMENT NO.1
TO CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS TRANSPORTATION STUDY - December, 1999.
PURPOSE:
The City previously intended to update the Traffic Circulation Element based on the
results of the completed City of Winter Springs Transportation Study prepared by
Conklin, Porter & Holmes. The contents of the Study are intended to replace completely
the current text and maps in the Traffic Circulation Element Volume 1 of2 and
Volume 2 of2. Since that time, the Town Center Concept has required a further revision
of the Updated Traffic Circulation Element Volume 1 of2 and 2 of2.
CHRONOLOGY:
*
City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan adopted on April 27, ] 992:
.
City Commission on November 13, 1996, hired Conklin, Porter & Holmes to
prepare update of the Traffic Circulation Element of the City's Comprehensive
Plan,
.
In 1997, the City Commission hired Dover, Kohl & Partners to develop a Town
Center Concept Plan. The Commission adopted said plan.
March I. 2000
2
Supplement 10 I.G-CPJ\-1-97
· In March, ] 998, the City COlllmission contracts with another Master Developer of
the Town Center, Joshi & Associates, Rohit Joshi proposed expanding the Town
Center to approximately 1,000 acres, extending to the beltway, as well as including
verious properties on the south side of S,R, 434,
CONSIDERA TIONS:
· The ORC Report on the Update to the Traffic circulation Element has been
received from DCA and Conklin, Porter and Holmes, the City's Transportation
consultant, has developed the response to it.
· The Update to the Traffic Circulation Element based on the City of Winter Springs
Transportation Study. August. 1997, was delayed for adoption 1998 due to: (1)
the new Town Center Concept Plan adopted by the Commission, (2) and later the
new Master Developer's desire to expand the Town Center Concept.,
· DCA is now reviewing the proposed large scale comprehensive plan amendment
LG-CP A-1-98 which involves the creation of a Town Center District on the Future
Land Use Map along with a vision statement, goal, objectives, and policies for the
new district.
· While it is not a requirement that the Local Planning Agency review any changes
to the proposed amendment (Update to the Traffic Circulation Element) after an
ORC has been issued by the Department of Community Affairs, City staff believes
it is appropriate never-the-less to bring such additional changes before the LP A for
their further review and recommendation to the City Commission.
· It is expected that DCA will send the ORC Report on the proposed Town Center
large scale comprehensive plan amendment by mid-March. Staff will respond to
any objections or recommendations in the ORC Report and schedule a second
(adoption) public hearing on the Town Center amendment in April. Because of the
relatedness of the Update to the Traffic Circulation Element plan amendment,
based on the Winter Springs Transportation Study. August. 1997 and its
supplement (Supplement No.1) to the Town Center plan amendment, it is
recommended that the LP A review and make recommendation on Supplement
No. 1 to the City Commission for the April adoption public hearing.
MardI I, 2000
..,
.)
SlIppklllcnllO LCi-CI'A-I-97
FUNDING:
The City paid Conklin, Porter & Holmes for the update of the Traffic Circulation Element
from the Transportation Impact Fee, and now paid CPH for Supplement No, ) to City of
Winter Springs Transportation Study, dated December, ) 999,
II. SUMMARY OF SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 TO THE CITY OF
WINTER SPRlNGS TRANSPORTATION STUDY, DATED
DECEMBER 1999:
The City of Winter springs Transportation Study, dated August, 1997, identified no deficiencies in
the transportation infrustructure of the City's local system for the projected 2010 traffic loadings.
Roadways identified for improvements included U.S. 17-92, S.R. 434, Seminola Boulevard, Lake
Drive, and Tuskawilla Road which are under the control of the County and FDOT. U.S. 17-92 is
under final construction of a six-lane improvement project from Shepard Road (Winter springs)
south to Melody Lane (Casselberry). State Road 434 has been improved to four (4) lanes from
S,R. 419 to the GreeneWay (S.R. 417). Seminola Boulevard has been improved to four (4) lanes,
Tuskawilla Road has been improved to four (4) lanes divided and Lake Drive is currently under
design for four (4) lanes, divided. This supplement updates the 1997 study to acknowledge these
improvements and the ones also constructed by the City, No changes were made to the land use,
existing uses, or projected development.
It has become evident that a collector road system is required for the undeveloped area east of the
City Hall. This area has been designated as the Town Center and is scheduled for growth within
the planning period, A roadway collector system has been identified to serve this area. Since
these roads are for new growth, the funding is projected to come from the transportation impact
fee. This collector system is shown on the attached revised drawings.
NOTE:
Only updated materials are attached to this supplement. Since the growth
projections have not been revised, the overall traftlc study remains valid.
NOTE:
Terry Zadtke, Conklin Porter & Holmes, will give a presentation on the
Supplement NO.1 to the City' of Winter Springs Transportation Study
August 1997.
IVI;Ii'ch I, 2000
LJ
SlIppkl11Cnllll 1.(;.CI'I\-I-')7
III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Local Planning Agency make the following recommendation to the
City Commission:
That the City Commission hold a second (adoption) public hearing and adopt the
proposed large scale comprehensive plan amendment (LG-CP A-1-97), updating
the Traffic Circulation Element in Volume 1 of2 and Volume 2 of2 of the City's
Comprehensive Plan, incorporating the response to the ORC Report and
Supplement No. 1 to the City of Winter Springs Transportation Study. August
1997,
ATTACHMENTS:
B. City oEWinter Springs TransRortation Study - August. 1997.
A. Supplement NO.1 to City of Winter Springs Transportation Study. August. 1997.
, C. Local Planning Agency Regular Agenda Item II. 1, For November 19, 1997
relating to LG-CP A-I-97 (Update to the Traffic Circulation Element).
March I. 2000
5
SlIppklllCll1 to 1,(;-CI'I\-I-<)7
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
1126 EAST STATE ROAD 04
WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708-2799
Telephone (407) 327-1800
Community Development
LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY REGULAR AGENDA ITEM:
II. 1.
CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE TRAFFIC
CmCULATION ELEMENT SUBSTITUTING CITY'S
TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR ALL TEXT AND MAPS IN VOLUME I
AND n. (LG-CPA-1-97)
STAFF REPORT:
. APPLICABLE LA \V AND PUBLIC POLIC'r':
The provisions of 163.3 I 74(4) 'Florida Statutes which states "Be the agency (Local
Planning Agency) responsible for the preparation of the comprehensive plan or plan
amendment and shall make recommendations to the governing body regarding the
adoption or amendment of such plan. During the preparation of the plan or plan
amendment and prior to any recommendation to the governing body, the Local Planning
Agency shall hold at least one public hearing, with public notice, on proposc::d plan or plan
amendment. ..
The provisions of Sec. 2-57 of the City Code which, state in part ", , ,the planning and
zoning board shall serve as the local planning agency pursuanr to the county
comprehensive planning act and the local government comprehensive planning act of the
state. . ."
The provisions of 163.3187 F.S, which state in part "Small scale development
amendments adopted pursuant to the paragraph (I )(c) require only one public hearing
before the governing board, which shall be an adoption hearing, . .Small scale
development amendments shall not become effective until J I days after adoption."
@
t-lovcrll~>cr 19. 17)1
LG,CP.\,I,?7
.
&
W
1. BACKGROUND:
APPLICANT:
City of Winter Springs
1126 East S.R. 434
Winter Springs, FL 32708
(407) 327-1800
REQUEST:
For the local Planning Agency to review and recommend the requested changes to the
City's Comprehensive Plan Traffic Circulation Element Data, Inventory & Analysis
section and Goals, Objectives and Policies section,
PURPOSE:
The City needs to update the Traffic Circulation Element based on the results of the
recently completed City of Winter Springs Transportation Study prepared by Conklin,
Porter & Holmes. The contents of the Study are intended to replace completely the
current text and maps in the Traffic Circulation Element Volume 1 of2 and
Volume 2 of 2.
CHRONOLOGY:
*
City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan adopted on April 27, 1992.
*
City Commission on November 13, 1996, hires Conklin, Porter & Holmes to
prepare update of the Traffic Circulation Element of the City's Comprehensive
Plan.
FUNDING:
The City pays Conklin. Porter & Holmes for the update of the Traffic Circulation Element
from the Transportation Impact Fee,
Novcmb.cr 19. 19')7
2
LG,CI'A,I,Q7
",
II.
COMPREHENsrVE PLAN AMENDMENT ANAL YSrs:
The following summarizes the data and issues which stafYanalyzed in reviewing this application,
CHANGES TO VOLU1VIE 1 OF 2 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN 190-2010, THE TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ELEMENT'S GOALS, OBJECTIVES,
AND POLICIES.
NOTE:
Changes are indicated as "shading" for additions' to original text, and
"strikethroughs" for deletions.
GOAL
Provide a road system within the City that facilitates internal traffic circulation, assists ingress and
egress from the municipal area, and accommodates through traffic simultaneously to coordinate
safely, efficiently, economically and conveniently the flow of all modes of transportation in and
around Winter Springs.
OBJECTIVE
A)
Throughout the planning period, the City shall develop and maintain a safe, convenient
and efficient motorized and non-motorized transportation network, through establishment
of criteria to be enforced during site plan review, concurrency management and access
management by the statutory deadline.
.
POLICIES
1) The collector road system shall be funded by the standards-driven, impact fee
created in 1990 by the City.
2) The collector road system shall be developed ,according to the master.conceptual
plan and design standards derived under the auspices of the City, to coordinate the
construction of segments of the system by both the public and the private sectors.
3) The conceptual plan does and shall continue to address through periodic review
these factors:
a. Current and projected deficiencies of arterial roads under other
jurisdictions,
b. Existing deficiencies of City collector streets,
L~a
W
NOvcnvK:t 19. 1997
~
J
LG.CP.:....!.?7
''''
\
c.
The optimal traffic circulation system to serve the creation in the
undeveloped central area of Winter Springs of a primary civic, business and
service focus for the City,
d, Dy tin:; ~t(ltutOjY dC<lJI;llc, Winter Springs shall ~Q:i.W\n9.:~:Ig adopt revisions
to the Land Development Regulations to include guidelines and criteria
consistent with nationally-recognized standards and tailored to local
conditions which provide for safe and convenient on-site traffic flow,
adequate pedestrian ways and sidewalks, as well as sufficient on-site
parking for both motorized and non-motorized vehicles.
4) Tile Jc.v;scd land development regulations, to be adopted by tile statutOI} dc.adl;Jlc
shaH contain specific access management alternative techniques t~..~ontrol access
and preserve level of service. These techniques may include but M~ not be limited
to the following:
a. Limit access to roads by controlling the number and location of site access
driveways and other intersecting roads;
b. Cross-access easements of adjacent properties where feasible;
c. Use of frontage or back-lot parallel access roads where feasible.
.
OBJECTIVE
B. Keep apprised of the schedules for improvements and ongoing policies of all jurisdictions
whose transportation responsibilities within the City limits affect the quality of life and the
levels of service on which Winter Springs citizens depend.
POLICIES
I) Continue to monitor the construction schedules of the Department of
Transportation regarding improvement of S.R. 434 through the City. Tillie
dc.vcloplUClIl pCIJlI;lS to tllc Jatc of (lIlt;(.;!Jo.tc.d w;Jcllill':; ;u 1995 - 199G so that the
level of service is not degraded below the State's criteria for a bac.klogged Ul Lall
P.Eh~.m:~ arterial link. In applying the lenience to permit three years in advance of
funded improvements, be selective so that development permitted to proceed prior
to actual construction of the higher capacity road will include only those projects
which further progress toward other goals.
2) Require all development plans for property abutting state highways to include
controlled access and minimal driveway cuts, with common service roads
@
l''''''mt.cr 19, 1??7
!j
I.G,CI'.\,I,'iJ
/vfJNUTES
LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
OCTOBER 29, 1997 - SPECIAL MEETTNG
1. CALL TO ORDER. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Planning and Zoning Board!LP A meeting was called to order Wednesday, October 29, 1997
at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Fernandez in the Municipal Building (City HaU, 1126 East State Road
434, Winter Springs, Florida). The Pledge of Allegiance followed.
ROLL CALL
Bill Fernandez, Chairman, present
Tom Brown, Vice Chairman, present
Gene Lein, present
Carl Stephens, present
Rosanne Karr, present
ALSO PRESENT
Charles C. Carrington, AlCP Community Development Coordinator
Tom Grirruns, AlCP Comprehensive Planning/Zoning Coordinator
Kip Lockcuff, UtiJity/Public Works Director
Terry Zaudtke, Consulting Engineer
APPROVAL OF THE OCTOBER 15. 1997 PLANNING AND ZONING
J30ARDILPA REGULAR MEETING MIN1JTES
There was discu~sion about the approval of the October 15, 1997 minutes. Correction: Rosanne
Karr (not Rozanne Karr). Motion by Gene Lein Second by Tom Brown. It was agreed that the
motion to adopt the minutes of October 15, 1997 was carried by consensus of the ,Board.
IT.
REGULAR AGENDA
~
A. ,Large Scale Comprehensive Plall Amelldment to the Traffic Circulation
Element, Volume I alld II (LG-CPA-1-97) RE: City Transportation Study _
August 19, 1997 By Conklin, Porter & HQlmes
Tom Grimms read from his staff report. He stated the staffs recommendations.
Tom Grirruns introduced to the Board Mr. Kip Lockcutf, UtilitylPublic Works Director and the
City's Consulting Engineer, Mr. Terry Zaudtke.
----."- --'.-:........_~-~~----_._--~._._._.~.
}.f fN U7C:S
LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
OCTOBER 29,1997. SPECIAL MEET1l'C
Page 2 0[5
Kip Lockcuff explained that the City's Traffic Circulation Map in the adopted Comprehensive
Plan was "somewhat unrealistic". In addition, some projects in this plan were deleted as they
"could not be built, didn't want to be built, didn't need to be built",
A "1997 Future Traffic Circulation Map" was distributed to all 'Board and staff members present,
and Mr. Lockcuff said what the changes were. There was discussion about the changes in the
original text and the new "replacement" text.
Gene Lein asked Tom Grimms if the Board had seen these changes before? Mr. Grimms stated
that No, this Board had not seen this information before. There was discussion about "feasible"
changes to the Traffic Circulation Map.
Chairman Fernandez asked Tom Grinuns "is' this hearing tonight our one public hearing"? Mr.
Grimms confirmed that it was.
There was discussion about parking problems and resolving the conflict about parking close t%r
on the City's "right-of-way". Chainnan Fernandez explained a particular parking problem on
Hayes Road. Mr. Lockcuff said that situations like these are a problem allover. Vice Chairman
Brown stated that he has concerns about the safety of bikers and joggers "because of the white
line that's on Northern Way...that's on Winter Springs Boulevard; they cannot ride behind each
other, they have to ride side by side, so they're...they're out on the street, and some of them are
children, and it's dangerous. I'm surprised no one's been killed yet, it's going to happen _ it's
definitely going to happen! Of course they'll blame the traffic, they won't blame...and they've got
sidewalks". Chairman Fernandez added "if we've addressed it, and staffcan come up with a better
solution, at least...at least it's been put on the record".
Chairman Fernandez asked Gene Leinif he still was interested in "an alternate EastlWest access
through Winter Springs? Nqw that 434 is four-Ianed, are you stilI of that opinion"? Mr: Lein
mentioned that that would have to be Panama Road. Terry Zaudtke interjected that "Lake Drive
is currently under design for four-Ianing and realignment, so on your southern side you're going to
end up with a four-lane road. You'll have TuskawilIa Road being a four-lane road and on your
southern boundary basically, you'll have another four-lane access road". Discussion followed with
some additional comments about county road changes near the Dog Track and other routes.
Chairman Fernandez asked about "participating bi-annually"? and "what would the costs be to
this"? Mr. Lockcuff stated that there "is no cost to the City - the staff just sits down and
reviews". There was discussion next about references to "light-rail" on previous documents, but
that that did not apply now.
Chairman Fernandez stated that in item number 5 (on page 5) - there should be a period instead of
a comma, "after Winter Springs"o
....,
.
8)
9J
~)
t)
connecting to adjac~0,t,d~velopment whenever possible, to minimize interruption of
traffic on the urban p:f..r~:f.ipal anerial sections, Coordinate permitting with the
D.O.T. Access Management Program,
3)
Pursue one of the objectives of the City's municipal collector road building
program - that of providing residents alternative routes over collector roads, to
reducc tll\;; dCjJClldcllcy 01. UY~ll,i.J' dCllcd Stelte. ell tGi ;illl OilJS.
4)
Kcep D.O.T. ;lIfOlllled o[tlle elllcl,:;clley ~CI y;ec~ ploy;~;ol. d;leJlIllIA tllc Cty IIOw
faces w;t11 0111) a two-Iall": ::>l,l,stalld'llJ eOIIl,cet;o., bc.t\-VCCII tl.G two s;dcs of tIle
Cty .so tllat 1IlC llccd to w;dcII S.R. 4:;4 as 50011 clS IJoss;blc ;S 1I0t oyellooked
""hell eOIISl!uet;oll scllcdulcs die ICY;Cwc.d yca.ly to dc.yc.lop tl.c IICxt 5 yeal State
phnr.
4-5)
Participate biannually in the update of the Seminole County Impact Fee road
construction schedule to press the need for widening of the' northern' section of
Tuskawilla Road, the only nO/1h-south arterial through Winter Springs, SOOllel
fllall 1999 as 1I0W plallllcd, '
5 6)
Coordinate development of all property in the City adjacent to Tuskawilla Road
with County requirements for laneage and intersection improvements to lessen
development impact until the road is improved.
7)
rroeeed w;tl. d.e 11IUll;e; pal Gol1cctol 10dJ jJlall Sc.~ll,el.ts tkH w ;11. cdil eet tl atTic
fr01l1 eOIlg,c.stcJ scct;OIl:) of T uska IV ;lIel Road to tIle collcetol loop, to Augl! ICllt the
cdpae;ty oft!.;,) adcl;al c\'IIU IlIa;lltaill tile kyc.l O[S"I y;CG set Gy tllc COUllty, as
apployc.d [01 ;l$ f-Ilall.
COopclAte w;tll tllc SC.Il';IIOIc. eOullt)' C.<pICS$wel) Autllol;t)' to plcpale [01 the
opellillg;1I 1994 oftllc ;lIt~l"helll.:;C. elt S.R. 4:;4 w;tll;lI tl,(.. c.;ty dlld Icy;eW
C.lIgiW...C.1 ill.:; jJlall;) "lid ;lIt<.;.,,::>;[;(.$ u[ d...."G1oplllcllt ;" \\';"[<';'1 ;)f-II ;,,~;) Lllat w;lluc
gcncldted Ly tll;$ Illajol ll,d~" ;llt~I;,,,....t;OII to (ISSUlC- tl.(..I" will be 110 dct.;IIIc.lltal
effects ou IIc.al Ly Pi OP~I ty ulldcl jlll ;sd;ct;oll of tl.c c.OUllty 01 tLc. Cty of 0 y;c.do to
tile. c.ast.
[Comprehensive Plan Amendment to delete 9), adopted on January 10, 1994]
111~~lli~~;~iZ~~1~;~i;~;~1h;~~~e;~i.<<.~
No,,""'Cmlxf 19. 1997
I.G,Cf',\,I,')7
)
\
, ,
.
~
OBJECTIVE
C) Throughout the planning period, the City will coordinate the transpor1ation system needs
with land use designations; planning for land use and transportation is to be closely
correlated by ensuring that adequate capacity is available to accommodate the impacts of
development.
POLICIES
1) ~:R~::Q!i~9.:p':y:~l D,tellll;lIc tll, dctl.l,d traffic counts, plus increases to occur from
then permitted development, 011 S.R. -1:'::4 alld CoulltY-lIlaillta;lIcd T uskawala Road
as of the effective date of the concurrency requirement.
2) EstaLlisl, }-leak hoUl ICvd of SCI v;e.c sldllJclld of"O" fOI S.R. 434 alld S.R. 419.
No development orders will be issued that will degrade the level of service
standard of"D" on all other roadways.
J) LstaLlish all illlGI ;111 Ic.vd of $(.1 viGe. ;';lalld'lI d 0["[" fOI T usk.a''villa Road. TI,is
Icvc.l uf sel vice. 5tCllldal cl 511<111 be. cll'Ill~e.J upOn (.Olllpkt;UIJ of IIIC SCI1l;nole e.Olillt}
Tusk.awilla Road Inl}-l! o v l..1 I Il;;nl PI O~I ,1111 ill 199G, Vv'I I\;;I I vOIIl}-lleled, 111e. CIl sllall
alllelld its COIll}-l! el!ellsi v ~ pldll 10 LOS 0,
3 4) Design and engineer the collector road system to minimize traffic impact on these
arterial roads.
4)
cr.
Create intersections of the new City collector roads with arterials where
they will coordinate with the filllctioning of arterials.
b. LllGIScct II.G wcst(.ltl elld of tile illtcllIcd loop Oflll(. CIl collectol load
SySlelll wcst ofll.e itltCISCCliulI ofS.R. .:j3.:j cllld S.R, .:j 19, Wllcle S.R. 434
is al. (,aJy r. v(, ICllIC~.
e. IlItclsect tll(. castelli ~Ild of tile Ctl loop cll;d S.R. 434 cast oftl.e
illte.1 scetioll of tk S.R. 434 cllld T uskavvilla Road, whe! c. pi ojccted h ame
COUlltS 011 S.R. 434 JC.CI e.a~G si~II;r;ealltly.
5) ~~ni,t(),r...~,~,~..~.JIlctioning of the arterial and~,olle.ctor road, system by use of the
m~~IFSUTMS model dCvdopcd tl'j)'date.d:=(f996) by the City's traffic
consultant so that collec[Qr road improvements may be scheduled according to
valid priorities.
6) Establish the level of service for municipal collector roads at LOS "0".
lJO'Vcml~( 19. 19?7
6
LG,CP,\,I,9)
-,
\
.
{:~
.~
'"')
I
As eaell .)CgIIILllt of tll\_ L1dl<lnccclll1tT11ici-p,t1 evlJcctol I acid SystGll1 is COlllplc.tcJ-;-
calculatL. tlte clJJ;Iiullc1111 c1ff,e CC,pc!(ily LI L.<ItL.c!, cllld el cJit tll;s ClIIIUUllt Iv 11.<. C;ty
bl 'I ~-.-,..,' d . I. ",. S'
to Clla <. <-quI' cl Gilt ::;1 v'" '" IV v... IJcllllltlC ,,,,It I111 V\ Illtel PllllgS.
8)
The City sllcdl eldopt llie 1I10St I ccellll) pllbl-i--s-hed-fDOT level of set v ice slalldal cis
pu\"licatioll 'Tlol idcl LCvd of SCI vice St<llld(ll Js ("lei GLliJelilles Mallual fOI
rlcllllliug" a.s it ;s Icccivcc! [;y 111c City to lIpdcltC tl,clcvcl of sel v;CG volullIG ta[;lcs
fal couCUllellcy Illall<\gelll~III Cllld Idclted IICUI5POllclt;01l plClllllillg.
15
:..../).
.1.fl~a~~a~~!~;:~:~;;~ir~~]~~~~II.If.
OBJECTIVE
D) Throughout the planning period, the City shall enforce the level of service standard on all
arterial and collector roads.
POLICIES
1)
t\rlopt..mB#.'~!.~:::~f.{~::m,$:nhor a t,r.ansportation concurrency 01 d;IIClIICC b} Octobel,
+99t; wfU1 fOIIUCIEL.;lIg f.6imaJi.z~,d procedures to th~t ascertain the permittability of
proposed developments according to criteria established by an expert consultant.
2) The City shall annually monitor the LOS status of arterial and all state r(),a.,d.,~~Y.s
.~,~,hi.~ ~,~e City including U.S. Highways 17 and 92 and the expI CSSwcl)' ~~f~fJ.1
![~lrWl!y~ by obtaining from the State and County their most recent traffic counts at
points along all roadways which would be affected by development in the City.
3) Permit no development within the Illunicipallimits that will cause the level of
service of any state arterial road to decrease below LOS "0" no sooner than three
years prior to construction funding of the impacted arterial as reflected in the
Florida Department of Transportation's then adopted Five- Year Plan.
rClIlIib .sllallllol [;e dellied, liow~v";l. [;ased olll} 011 a lelllpol al} degl adat;oll ill
LOS tllat wOulJ OCCUI ;ftlll::: ;lItcldlCllI=>C5 oftll~ Selllillo!c COUllt)' L^plesswa} at
Rcd Dug Lak.c Road "lid at S.R. 4J4 wele opclled pliOI to tIle cOlllpletioll of tIle
cclusel?-cl} aC105.5 Lake. Jcsup. Tile tCIIIPUldl} CX(.CS5 t11lOLlg11 tlougll ti(\[f;c 511all
uot \.,C ;lIcluJed ill cc\lculcd;lI::; LOS. IlItCllm:diak ::.ta::;CS witll wl,icll illtcJ c1lclilgCS
OpCll 011 ReJ Dug Lak.c RUCld c(lld S.R. ..JJ-l will JltlW llcdT.c tluou::;l. \,VilltCI
Spl ;llgS to t]l(~ L^PI CSSway dicit w;1I1 cd;, eel CIWelY ~ 0111 tll(. Cily to tile 1101 tli of
Novcmb.cr 19, J9?7
7
I.G,CPA,I,97
'.......
\
.
~
Lake. Jc.sup wlICI' tllal ;1,tc:n:-h.IIl~L;s VfJLI'Cd, 1'11(. LXL:U;' Ilcdl--;t- S11<11t-bc COIII/-lulcJ
by lllcall;' o[tll(. rSUTMS IIIoJcI O[tLL Cty'~ l,cl[f;(. c.;ICuldtioll alld tl,at Ggulc
sh-allllot be c.llcll~cablc to tile CIy ill J(l(111,ill;ll~ S,R, .:J3cl capacity 01 Tu~h.awillc):
Road e.c1paC;ly 10 PCIII,;1 JcvdOpllKll1 ;11 lllG Cly,
OBJECTIVE
E) Create through the configuration of the City-wide collector road system the interaction
and cohesiveness that have been lacking among the residential neighborhoods of Winter
Springs, but do so in a manner that enhances and preserves the quality of life within each
community.
POLICIES
1) Extend the several true collector roads that now end abruptly or degrade from
paving to unimproved status within existing neighborhoods without connection or
outlet to another collector road or arterial, to complete valid collector linkages for
these communities.
2)
When designing extensions of existing collector roads to their logical arterial
connection south of the City - the Lake Orive-Seminola Boulevard major collector
that is planned for i~p'~?veme~tby the county - choose rights-of-way that
minimize intrusion ~5.:qI?~:{:thr,Q((gH:high spe:~diifatlic 011 tile, es;dellts, so that
improved traffic circulation is not at the expense of peaceful habitation.
3) Plan for completion of the one-ended collector roads in existing developments on a
neighborhood-by-neighborhood basis so that input from the residents is acquired.
4) The City, shall ensure the provision and maintenance of bicycle and pedestrian
walkways to supplement collector roads between residential areas and parks,
schools, and other major attractors. Specific provisions for the establishment and
maintenance of bicycle and pedestrian walkways shall include, but not necessarily
be limited to the following:
a. The City shall review all proposed development for its accommodation of
bicycle and pedestrian traffic needs,
b. The I evised land development regulati()ns, 10 be. adopted by tile statutolY
deadli'le, shall ;1Ic1uck ;,lclllclclI Js cori'tiil'lte to require all new developments
to provide bicycle parking spaces,
NuvcmlKt 19, 19?7
8
LG,CI'A,I,97
.
~
c. SidewalksoH9rher pedesrr;an ,,;ays shall be provided where feasible and
appropriare along all roadways,
OBJECTIVE
F) In the design of the municipal collector road system, seize opportunities to solve specific
problems.
POLICIES
1) COOl dillate tllG illtCl5cct;01l of th\:; colkcto, 1001-1 ClIIJ T uskaw;!ld Road witll tile
Scbool DOdld (0 d\:;vc.lof-J (III (d;~III1I\:lIllllelt llIay oITel edh~llIat;vc access to tile
pi escllt dc.lllclltal y sellool ellld tll(~ plelllllcd III;Jclle school 011 T Liska w ilia Road.
1 2) Eliminate landlocked parcels by providing for rights-of-way to reach these
properties.
2 3) Emphasize improved access for emergency vehicles to secluded areas in the
design.
3 4) Permit no individual residential driveways onto collector t,Q?:f!~~:Y.fh~f~:::f~:~$I~!~f. or
altelialloads ""bell 10calloCldwClYs Celli b~ c1cs;~lled ellld developed \;t.dlicb
cOllsolidalc li ipS to tile colledol VI ell tel ;e1l I OdJ ~y~lelll.
4 5) Encourage "green commerce" along the a.!?.~h9.,b'l1~d CSX railroad corridor to
create an open view near any intersections of crossroads and the tracks. Green
commerce is to be defined by the City and shall include such commercial activities
as nurseries, truck farming, and outdoor recreation which does not require large
areas of vertical construction to block the driver's clear view.
OBJECTIVE
G) Conserve the natural environment and augment open space in the City as functions of road
development.
POLIClES
1) Where valid options are available, choose rights-of-way for the City collector
system distant enough from natural drainage features and upland habitats to
coexist with these natural areas.
t-!ovcml,Kr 19,1997
9
LG,CPA,I,97
2) The incursion of a roadway through these natural areas shall be allowed if it
benefits the public need, such as for access by emergency vehicles or transporting
school children, outweighing other concerns.
3) Include in all new road plans adequate right-of-way for potential landscaping and
provide for maintenance, in the annual budget of the City.
4) Designate scenic drives along which collector road construction will be adapted to
preserve as much as possible of existing vegetation and canopy.
OBJECTIVE
H) Ensure that current and future rights-of-way are protected from encroachment from
structures or ancillary uses inconsistent with the designation of ri~~,t~~<:>r~~.~Y.:.,.~,~~t.~~,~.f~
iiiii~1ri~~~1J.~:~:~]:~11:B:l;'fa~::~J~'JJ:i~~fsshe~j~~ ~:~~~;;~.s ~n!;~f~~~:~~:~~~!!!~IQt
shall be preserved through enforcement of setback provisions, which prevent
encroachments into the rights-of-way.
POLICIES
1)
The City, in tllC~ ICvi~ed Its land development regulations to be. adopted by tile
statutOI y dc.adl;lIc, shall require the dedication of all needed rights-of-way and
necessary roadway improvements for all new development, and adopt provisions
to protect existing rights-of-way by limiting the use and/or encroachment by
structures and ancillary uses.
.
2) The City shall acquire right-of-way for future transportation needs as funds
become available.
%.\15':mBmrrw
~E..~4~~~i~
!1
Ilfllf.~itft~,ffi:~:::ttq}y.~:::!:8.::~:Y~J,:O:ltP'O'.it,res : 'rei a t in g idi:left tu rn.1 an'es';}a::~~:~I~[~m?:W:::~:n~:lP;1f6.!
pJtlEIGIES
.........'\,-^.....~..~.......-.....................
1)
ili.lli~:~i~~11:~;[tg~:~!.if:~1~r.l~~~~~:~:~::~i::#~:;:f'e'quj'f,ed\wji~R:gny::~w&::(@)::::P.:f
a~: tW:~J~E,::~p'~'~~'wmw'::1 s'e~L,al to' or gre~re.~ t han:ihi r1y~lrv,~:tj:$)::h{p.B.}
~
~
No'VcrnL-:r 19. I ?"J1
10
LG,Cl'A,I,97
.~-\
8
@
g~
Q;:
l~jl.(&~J~~~i:~J;~:~~~~i;~r:~. ~~~ee~ It I r;;~gu;;~~'~'1~%~~illidt
C:J
Ir'jl~~~1,j~I~~trgl.'iilr9:ffi
en
ii~ll!ii~iil{~~~~~~iWn~~~~:yii~~tii'i.l
e~
i~!Wf~f=;I~i;fll~~~~~~r~:tJ~ \tsi',t-J:~~;~~~~g~::~~c~,~:~:JWgn!lY~~Y:i:$.:~m1.:ngt~
f~
~~~~'~r~1~~:t~:I~e'l~~~~~:~:c~;6~~~'ralt~:tru'~:~i~~(~::}$.':::$P'ffi:~{~R!:::fQ:9.:m:~In
g~~
~fii;~!ill!Dg:;;~ijino(:~t ~ee[ or access:: pqint.;d.river.Y~y.)i$.::::f9.:nlr.;Q,H~#.::[~yi::~
S.~P~f.Al~:f.i~ft:::ffi:trt:I~H~~:mf~:YeqWf~B," <> n't ~e:}ij't~r:s:ec~iRg:miH'Q[r~'tt.~~f.~::PE[~g~:~~
PQmpl@f!y.~lv$y~:~}yH:~!H~:Dy':::t}~t{::(~)<pr. n\or~:::p'f:'tJl~:::fol1p~ln.g:::w~rr~n~~I~[~i,~?q~fj~~~
~H
ii~i~l~i;i~~~i::~~~~~':~;~~~,~f[~~eri\,mfhi~~i~~,~~~~f:::9.f::4g9.g~:~:::PQIDl
,Q?,
~~11~~~~i~~k~E:;:~;~i,'F~~~;:;1~~:;~:~~~~I'fl~
c.~
~Y.~n~,~J~:[~nuit:::#.:I:~J~r;,~~:j~}ri 6 t, a n. a p p I i cab I e '\V~r:ra n'dlni:i1:n~::;'9.~~:~;:
i%
l~i~!~~~ffji~~~:~}'~~1~f~~~Ili;;;~~~~;: '~.f~~:~,~l~'-illlf.Jlli\ii#.
ei
>>'-h~n::th~:Iil.t~(s~2i in'g'slrc'e tor a c c'e ss' po i n t ,d H veW:~ly:.:ls::tp.H~f:pit~mf~y)::g
(?#fi ~:,s i iD.~E'
NovcmlKr 19. 1997
l,G,C/'^,I,?1
II
'\
.
~
1'i
. .:).
~J.
c~
.....,..
em
..........
gJ
ff
1~~I;;l~~;~;r:.:~f:};~l;otl\I~~V:~'~e;~~~~~l~[ ~1~:!~ r~~: rih~~~i II" be'ir~q~i\E~:~:WH~,q:M~!
a~
B9.~m:~~?T9.'fi:i,ir ee t,' :>'P:~:e:~:ji 11'1i (is : ~q lI'a((o';6dg+eaie'[ithA.B::f.Q:5Y::;(4:Q):::mpR~
1#
fi.9.:ffi,~~r;:;;a'f:fHmt::iUrili i)g;::ffi~\ielh~M~:frQ$::tB.:~:::m~j9!:rQ,?~:V{~y:::f~:;::~&v:?W::i:~@:~:[
~f;~~:r~f::JEiQ:;:1.mEyL(~:Q):'::~Jir;6g, ~i illihX@j:;A;i.Mi::::;qr:::R:;:M~;:;:R.~:~k:::H.9g:f!::Qfi!H;~:
nf~Jgn::~t'!1~~N
C~
11'lttt~~t~t~~}~f~;~!rlfll~})II"~
g~
1~~~f;f~IIIf:.:~~;I{:.~~~;f~6~~~i~:~~~::1~~~~~:fd':Wt~~~~:::f.#.:qm!yj:~i:$:~:IDtE~l~
Sf.
!:t.l!:~[~~ct.IRg~;U[;;ef:o'r,'a:~:~e.~$:;poi nl;d:riv.:eW~y:m(:::toi1tr.p1f~:a.:::~'y:::~;:::imiJ.g:i$JM?I@
ittll~;[2J~~W~f-j~J~~~i~~:',t~~:~lr~~;o~:~::t':;~I\~!fJ~J.~~tJ~t~2~~l~:'lil~i.I~i!lrjJ@
~
B;g.Kf.~:~,;:~B:~:~~:lj:m~t:;!9 f:"tGe;: i:nt erseCtin. g::ol-a:q:9~~$.~':'phiBt:::4[!J~~w:?Y!}.!~~:~oo~t!j~~
g:r~[~~.t.~:dmw.fjl.1lhY,:{J.Q):mph.
Q~:
1IIIIlit~~~~~J!~!~{~~l~Milt~III.4~~
~y~fi,abl'~:;:~!g.!m:4i#a n~:~jS\h.ot :a'n:'ap~lj-da.151:~:::o/iVf~Rhl.:Q::j:m!~;:ig?$.~::
i'rlije art~r.~aLstreet which is being entefed:hasbeen:d:e~igR~t.~(l:~:@~
~8h.t.ioll~4::~:~tess facility by Seminole County: FDOT;'::Ot::~H~:::,GltY::Qf.tYJ!:Ql~r
stmhgs:
!rr'f.~H~9n6.g~~:t.[:~~f::Q ~::~:~<>e.~,s,:, pO,i n i:,di,iY:~y'<a )(:Is,':co,n tr'9.il.~fr:~:Y::@::ilrnff!:9I~!M?;I~
1~~~~~~1~j;~~,t:';~~~~~~-t~;~;-~S?ti:~:'d~;~~i~~';::~~:ri:::~h4:::tB:~EHgH.tm!m
November 19, 1997
LG,CP,\,I,')1
17
CHANGES TO VOLUM E 2 OF 2 CITY OF Wll\'TCR SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE
" PLAN 190-2010, THE TRA FFTC CII1CU L\ TIOi~ CLEi\'! [NT'S DATA AND ANALYSIS.
A. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROJCCTIONS; CONCURRENCY
Substitute pages III- 7 to IV -13 inclusive in place of existing pages 1'C-I to 1'C-42
inclusive.
B. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT:
The proposed changes in the City of Winter Springs Transportation Study, August 1997,
prepared by Conklin, Porter & Holmes will help promote economic development by
requiring the provision and timing of roadway infi'astll.lcture to meet the market demand
for new land use development, thereby creating a etlicient and convenient flow of traffic
through Winter Springs,
C. CONSISTENCY/COMPATIBILITY WITH CITY, STATE, AND REGIONAL
COl\1PREHENSIVE PLANS:
1.
WITH THE CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
o
This City initiated comprehensive plan amendment is inrended to update the Traffic
Circulation Element' Data, lnventol)' & Analysis (Volume I of2) and the Goals,
Objectives and Policies (Volume 2 of 2). These changes will be compatible with
the other elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan.
The comprehensive plan amendment is compatible with and not in conflict with the
other elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan, specifically:
Capital Improvements Element:
Policy 1 a under Objective A
Policy, I under Objective C
Policy I under Objective D
Objective E
t-~
'\Q
November 19. 19?7
I:';
LG,Cf'A,I,97
2, WITH THE STATE COfvIPREl-fENSlVE PLAN: 163,3 177( 10)(A) F.S,
The comprehensive plan amcndmel1l is compatible with and furthers the following
goals, objectives and policies of the State Comprehensive Plan in Chapter 187 F.S.
9J-5.021(4) F.A.C.
(16) Land Use
Policy 5
(12) Energy
Policy 3
(18) Public Facilities
Policy 4,7, 9
NOTE:
A Local comprehensive plan shall be consistent with a
Comprehensive Regional Policy Plan or the State Comprehensive
Plan if the local plan is compatible with and furthers s\lch plans.
9J-5.021(1) F.A.C.
-
The term "compatible with" means that the local plan is not in
conflict with the State Comprehensive Plan or appropriate
comprehensive regional policy plan. The term "furthers" means to
take action in the direction of realizing goals or policies of the state
or regional plan. 9J-5.021 (2) F.A.C.
For the purposes of determining consistency of the local plan with
the State Comprehensive Plan or the appropriate regional policy
plan the state or regional plan shall be construed as a whole and no
specific goal and policy shall be construed or applied in isolation
from the other goals and policies in the plans, 9J-5.021(2) F.A.C.
3. WITH THE EAST CENTRAL FLORIDA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL
POLICY PLAN: 186,507 F.S.; 27-E-4' F.A.C.
The comprehensive plan amendment is compatible with and furthers the following
goals, objectives and policies of the East Central Florida Comprehensive Regional
Policy Plan. 9J-5.021(4) F.A.C.
Policy 64.2: J
@
Novanlx:t 19, 1917
ItJ
LG,Cf'A,I,?7
.
ilL
@
Policy 64,6: 3
Policy 64,S: I
Policy 64,2]: I
NOTE:
A Local comprehensive plan shall be consistent with a
Comprehensive Regional Policy Plan or the State Comprehensive
Plan if the local plan is compatible with and fUl1hers such plans,
9J-5,021 (I) F.A.C.
The term "compatible with" means that the local plan is not in
conflict with the State Comprehensive Plan or appropriate
comprehensive regional policy plan. The term "ful1hers" means to
take action in the direction of realizing goals or policies of the state
or regional plan. 9J-5,011 (2) F.A.C.
For the purposes of determining consistency of the local plan with
the State Comprehensive Plan or the appropriate regional policy
plan the state or regional plan shall be construed as a whole and no
specific goal and policy shall be construed or applied in isolation
from the other goals and policies in the plans. 9J-5.021 (2) F.A.C.
FINDINGS:
*
A number of changes have occurred since the preparation and adoption
,(on April 27, 1992) of the City's comprehensive Plan, prompting' the need for an
update of the Traffic Circulation Element.
*
City Commission hires Conldin, Poner & Holmes to update the Traffic Circulation
Element.
*
The City initiated comprehensive plan amendment updates the Traffic Circulation
Element' Data, Inventol)' & Analysis (Volume I of1) and the Goals, Objectives
and Policies (Volume 2 of2), These changes are compatible with the other
elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan.
*
The comprehensive plan amendment is compatible with and not in conflict with the
other elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan,
NOVClnbcr 19. 17)7
IS
I.C,O'",I,97
0,
e
>I<
The comprehensive pli1n amendment is cOl11p(l[ible with and furthers the goals,
objectives and policies of the State Comprehensive Plan,
>I<
The comprehensive plan amendment is compatible with and furthers the goals,
objectives and policies of the East Central Florida Comprehensive Regional Policy
Plan,
IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Local Planning Agency make the following recommendation to the
City Commission:
That the City Commission hold a first (transmittal) public hearing and transmit to
the Department of Community AtTairs the proposed large scale comprehensive
plan amendment (LG-CP A-I-97), updating the Traffic Circulation Element in
Volume 1 of2 and Volume 2 of2 of the City's Comprehensive Plan.
ATTACHMENTS:
City of Winter Springs Transportation Stud" - August 1997
NUV"Crnl.o<:r 19. 19?"'
16
LG,CI',\,I,97
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
TRANSPORTATION STUDY
AUGUST 1997
Conklin, Porter and Holmes - Engineers, Inc.
1104 E. Robinson Street
Orlando, Florida 32801
CPH Project No, W0459.00
,-
i
~
I
I
-
,
,
"
J
I
I
!
INDEX
CHAPTER I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . INTRODUCTION
CHAPTERII ........................ FINANCIAL RESOURCES ANALYSIS
CHAPTER ill ........................ TRANSPORTATION PLAN
CHAPTERrv ....................... CONCURRENCYPLANNlNG
I
tI
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
,
,
!
CHAPTER r
INTRODUCTION
Background
Winter Springs, a community of26,000 persons, is served by one major north-south route in the
central part of the city, Tuskawilla Road, and one major east-west route, S.R. 434. Two major
north-south routes exist on the western and eastern boundaries. On the western boundary is U.S.
17-92 and on the eastern boundary is the Greeneway, a multi-lane tollway. Located in south-
, central Seminole County in a ruralIsuburban residential setting, the City's major roadways
provide access to neighboring towns for Winter Springs residents and employees and facilitate
the flow of through traffic.
State Road 434 provides access to Oviedo and the Greeneway to the east and to Longwood and
U.S. 17-92 to the west. U.S. 17-92 and the Greeneway provide major arterial routesto Sanford
to the north or Orange County to the south. Recent widening of S.R. 434 from S.R. 419 to
TuskaWilla Road and projected widening from Tuskawilla Road to the Greeneway have positive
benefits for the City of Winter Springs.
Traffic circulation patterns are directly dependent upon the land uses associated with the property
adjacent to the roadway. While other factors such as major trip attraction (a theme park or an
airport) can have a substantial effect, it is often the land uses which dictate the current and
projected traffic volumes on a given road. A thorough examination of the land, uses and
projected COnstruction was performed as part of this Transportation Plan update.
Purpose
There are two primary purposes for the City of Winter Springs TransPortation Study. The first is
to develop a t:ran.Sportation plan that defines the needs of the city'fu. 'the forecast year 2010. The
second purpose is to. establish a mechanism for monitoring new development to insure that
needed transportation facili~es are in place concurrent with impacts from such development In
addition, the following purposes are also important:
1. Develop a plan to guide the city in future transportation decisions; ,
2. Provide the Traffic Circulation Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan;
3. Develop a plan that assures that transportation improvements requirectof
developers in the city are in accordance with the long range needs of the city;
4. Define capital improvements needed to maintain a satisfactory level of service;
5. Review current fmancial resources available for transportation funding in the city.
[- I
e
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.,
f
I
Transportation Plan Methodology
The City of Winter Springs is an integral part of the Orlando Urban Area Additionally, the city
is one of the larger municipalities within Seminole County and is located between two principal
arterials, S.R. 434 and Red Bug Lake Road. As such, transportation planning for Winter Springs
requires close cooperation with other planning efforts within the Orlando Region and Seminole
County. For this reason, the transportation planning methodology used to develop the
transportation plan must necessarily be compatible with transportation planning methodologies in
adjacent jurisdictions.
In order to accomplish this requirement, extensive use of data sources and planning models from
the Orlando Urban Area Transportation Study (OUA TS) and the Seminole County
Transportation Management Program (TMP) were used in the development of the Winter
Springs Transportation Plan. The transportation plan development was divided into two phases.
These are:
Phase I - Organization and Data Collection; and
Phase II - Analysis and Plan Development.
Additionally, a third phase of the project was defllled to allow for the monitoring of new
development:
Phase III - Concurrency Planning.
Wherever possible, existing data from the QUATS and the Seminole County TMP were used in
the development of the Winter Springs Transportation Plan. This not only provides compatibility
with other planning activities within the region but, in addition, the use of existing data sources
minimizes the need for creating extensive new data
- All data collection efforts were designed to permit complete use of existing data sources. After
existing data -',.vere carefully reviewed, additional data were collected. Among the data required
to conduct the technical analyses were land use/socio-economic data, traffic counts,
" ,
transportation planning models currently used in the surrounding region and existing data for
, planned developments withiD. the city and adjacent areas.
Transportation models developed from the OUATS and the TMP were applied for.existing
conditions to validate their effectiveness in forecasting existing traffic patterns withiri. the Winter
Springs Study area These tests were made in order to validate the use of the models.and the data
~puts to the models for forecast conditions. In order to permit more detailed analysis of
conditions within the Winter Springs Study area, a more refined highway network and a zonal
system compatible with this network were developed.
1-2
I
I
Existing deficiencies on city, COW1ty and state systems were defmed and Capital Lmprovement
Programs identified to resolve these transportation deficiencies. No existing deficiencies were
defined on the city collector system.
I
I
Forecasts of anticipated land use/socio-economic activities for 2010' were made and the validated
transportation models applied against them. This allowed the definition of future capacity
deficiencies so that funding sources can be. developed to correct these deficiencies.
I
I
W045900JNT
I
I,
f
[-3
I
I
CH.J\PTER II
I
'FINANCIAL RESOURCES ANALYSIS
I
Local governments in Florida are now confronting the fiscal situation of ever increasing demands
for services and capital facilities contrasted with declining assistance from traditional State and
Federal sources. National imperatives to reduce Federal budget deficits appear to offer little hope
for a resurgence of external funding sources for local improvements. In addition, recent changes in
the State Comprehensive Planning legislation now mandate that adequate infrastructure capacity be
present or programmed by the governing jurisdiction as a condition precedent to new development
approval. The local manifestations of these policy changes are twofold. First, local governments
must now develop alternative fimding strategies to accommodate new growth and development.
Second, the local government must ensure that the timing of the revenue collections and the
subsequent improvement construction are such that new infrastructure capacity is available when
required to accommodate new growth.
I
I
I
f
For pUrposes of this Transportation Study, funding will only be evaluated from the perspective that
projects contained herein are growth-induced. In cases where a roadway improvement is clearly
required to satisfy travel demand related to new growth and development, local governments are
entitled to pass this cost along to development in the form of regulatory fees collected prior to the
occupancy of the building. On the other hand, highway construction required as a result of existing
capacity deficiencies must be funded through traditional general revenue sources. These deficiencies
are being covered by other City programs and resources. The transportation impact fee should
provide the City of Winter Springs with sufficient revenue to maintain the desired level of services
on the highway network within its jurisdiction.
Financial Analysis Format
This analysis evaluates the City of Winter Springs Transportation Impact Fee Funding to establish
the following:
1. Historical revenue collection and expenditure patterns;
2. Project revenue sources available to amortize any roadway deficiencies andJor
construct growth induced improvements; .
3. Provide a Capital Improvement Program format for the initial five year period of the
transportation study.
A general analytical framework is provided with which the city staff can replicate the type of fiscal
impact determinations provided in this report. By so doing, the City of Winter Springs will derive
maximum benefit from this study.
[I -1
-
m
g
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1..,
r
Data Base
Data for this portion of the report have been taken from the following sources:
1.
2.
City of Winter Springs Annual Budget, FY 1995-96 and 1996-97;
City of Winter Springs Annual Financial Statement, FY 1993-94 and FY 1994-95.
All data contained herein have been provided by the City of Winter Springs and are shown in
Appendix Table A-I through A-4 and represent all funding sources and expenditures for
transportation purposes available to the City.
Local Option Gas Tax - During the past five years, Winter Springs has made extensive use of Local
Option Gas Tax (LOGl) funds for area wide roadway construction. In fact, the LOGT contingent
of funding has constituted the most significant revenue source for roadways in the City of Winter
Springs during the historical period surveyed. During this time, LOGT funds have ranged from a
low of$205,765 inFY 1993-94 to a high of$268,779 in FY 1990-91. Winter Springs has used these
funds for a variety of transportation related projects. All funds have been allocated from this fund
to improve existing deficiencies and maintenance and are not available for construction of the growth
related roadway improvement projects.
One Cent Sales Tax - Seminole County has a one cent sales tax which is used specifically in the
County for transportation/roadway improvements.
Federal Revenue Sharing (FRS) - This revenue source has typically not demonstrated stability in year
to year appropriations. Local entitlements are always uncertain as a result of the Federal budget .
process, and the program is always in danger of termination. For these reasons, it is'recommended
that this revenue source be considered expendable. The City of Winter Bprings should not consider
funding any critical roadway project primarily from FRS funds. Instead, to the extent that FRS funds
are available" if at all, the City should accelerate its Capital Improvement Program, or consider
adding projects which are not considered financially feasible when'using only hard -revenue sources.
Special Assessment Proiects - During the past twenty years, the City of Winter Springs has only used
this mechanism on improvements to Moss Road from S.R 434 to S.R. 419. It is recommended. that
. the City of Winter Springs .use special assessment projects as little as possible to improve local
streets.
General Fund Appropriations - These revenues, generally derived from ad valorem assessment, are
not used for funding major capital improvements in the roadway system. They are appropriated to
repair and replacement (R&R) expenditures, and to operation and maintenance (O&M) expenditures.
In addition, these revenues are generally used for major debt service by most cities in the State of
Florida. The City of Winter Springs has adhered to these principle during the five year period of the
financial inventory.
rI-2
I
I
Transportation Impact Fees
I
These are fees collected from new development/growth for the construction of new and improved
roadways,. The improvements must provide capacity for growth. Impact fees are not used for
correcting existing roadway deficiencies or repair and maintenance projects. These funds are used
to provide roadway capacity when and where it is needed in a timely fashion in order to allow growth
in an orderly fashion. It is advisable to periodically review the projects funded by impact fees to
determine that the funds are going to the area with the most need.
I
I
J
Roadway Revenue Resources
I
As noted earlier, this review emphasizes only hard revenue sources. Therefore, while Federal
revenue Sharing or State DOT discretionary funding may playa role in funding some roadway
segments, this analysis assumes that only those revenues identified as hard revenue sources will be
used to fund improvements.
J
I
Table 1
Available Transportation Revenues for Roadway Improvements
Local Option Gas Tax
One Cent Sales Tax
Transportation Impact Fees
W045900.FINJtm
[1-3
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
CHAPTER ill
TRANSPORTATION PLAN
This Chapter documents the updating of the transportation plan for the City of Winter Springs. This
plan was developed using procedures and data from similar planning activities in the surrounding
jurisdictions as well as information from the 1988 Transportation Element of the Comprehensive
Plan. The planning process focused on a detailed analysis of the roadways in Winter Springs
including the Municipal Collector Syste~.
The City of Winter Springs is an integral part of the Orlando Urban Area In order to be compatible
with planning efforts in the Orlando area, extensive use was made of data sources from the Orlando
Urban Area Transportation Study (OUATS) and the Seminole County Transportation Management
Program (TIv[P). Transportation planning models and procedures from these processes were also
used wherever possible. '
I
Goals and Obiectives
I
Traffic circulation Goals and Objectives were developed as part of the Comprehensive Plan and
updated in this study. The updated goals, objectives and policies are as follows:
GOAL
I
Provide a road system within the City that facilitates internal traffic circulation, assists ingress and
egress from the municipal area, and accommodates through traffic simultaneously to coordinate
safely, efficiently, economically and conveniently the flow of all modes of transportation in and
around Winter Springs.
OBJECTNE .
A) , Throug.O.out the .planning period, the City shall develop and maintain a safe convenient and
efficient motorized and non-motorized transportation network., through establishment of
criteria to be enforced during site plan review, concurrency management and access
management by the Statutory deadline.
Policies
1) The collector road system shall be funded by the standards-driven impact fee created
in 1990 by the City.
2) The collector road system shall be developed according to the master conceptual plan
and design standards derived under the auspices of the City, to coordinate the
construction of segments of the system by both the public and the private sectors.
III-I
3) The conceptual plan does and shall continue to address through periodic review these
factors:
a. Current and projected deficiencies of arterial roads lU1der other jurisdictions;
b. Existing deficiencies of City collector streets; and
c. Winter Springs shall continue to adopt revisions to the Land Development
Regulations to include guidelines and criteria consistent with nationally-
recognized standards and tailored to local conditions which provide for safe
and convenient on-site traffic flow, adequate pedestrian ways and sidewalks,
as well as sufficient on-site parking for both motorized and non-motorized
vehicles.
4) Land development regulations, contain specific access management alterriative
techniques to control access and preserve level of service. These techniques include
but are not limited to the following:
a. Limit access to roads by controlling the number and location of site access
driveways and other intersecting roads;
b. Cross-access easements of adjacent properties where feasible; and
c. Use of frontage or back-lot parallel access roads where feasible.
OBJECTIVE
B). Keep apprised of the schedules for improvements and ongoing policies of all jurisdictions
whose transportation responsibilities within the City limits affect the quality of life and the
levels of service on which -Winter Springs citizens depend.
Policies
1) Continue to monitor the construction schedules of Department of Transportation
regarding improvement ofSR 434 through the City so that the level of service is not
degraded below the State's criteria for a principal arterial link. In applying the
lenience to permit three years in advance of funded improvements, be selective so
that development permitted to proceed prior to actual construction ot: the higher
capacity road will include only those projects which further progress toward other
goals.
2) Require all development plans for property abutting state highways to include
controlled access and minimal driveway cuts, with common service roads connecting
fII-2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
f
to adjacent development whenever possible, to minimize interruption of traffic on
the principal arterial sections. Coordinate permitting with the D.O.T. Access
Management Program.
3)
Pursue one of the objectives of the City's municipal collector road building program
- that of providing residents alternative routes over collector roads.
4)
Participate biannually in the update of the Seminole County impact fee road
construction schedule to press the need for widening of the northern section of
Tuscawilla Road, the only north-south arterial through Winter Springs.
5)
Coordinate development of all property in the City adjacent to Tuscawilla Road with
County requirements for laneage and intersection improvements to lessen
development impact until the road is improved.
6)
Continue to work with other jurisdictions to convert the former railroad into a
corridor for alternative modes of travel within the City - walking trails, bicycle paths,
equestrian and recreation.
OBJECTIVE
C)
Throughout the planning period, the City will coordinate the transportation system needs
with land use designations; planning for land use and transportation is to be closely
correlated by ensuring that adequate capacity is available to accommodate the impacts of
development
Policies
1)
Make.bi-annual traffic counts, plus increases to occur from permitted development
as of the effective date of the concurrency requirement.
2)
No development orders will be issued that will degrade the level of service standard
of D on all roadways. Level of service must consider vested development and
transportation facilities committed for construction within three y~.
3) Design and engineer the collector road system to minimize traffic impact on these
arterial roads.
4) Create intersections of the new City collector roads with arterials where they will
coordinate with the functioning of arterials.
5) Monitor the functioning of the arterial and collector road system by use of the
ITI-J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r
I
TRANPLAJ"-IIFSUTMS model updated (1996) by the City's traffic consultant so that
collector road improvements may be scheduled according to valid priorities.
6) Establish the level of service for municipal collector roads at LOS D.
7) Require a traffic study for all new development generating more than 300 Daily
Trips. Such study to be conducted in accord with written procedures provided by the
City.
OBJECTIVE
D) Throughout the planning period, the City shall enforce the level of service standard on all
arterial and collector roads.
Policies
1) Update and monitor transportation concurrency with formalized procedures that
ascertain the permittability of proposed developments accordiiig to criteria
established by an expert consultant.
2) The City shall annually monitor the LOS status of arterial and all state roadways
within the City including U.S. Highways 17 and 92 and the Eastern Beltway, by
obtaining from the State and County their most recent traffic counts at points along
all roadways which would be affected by development in the City.
3) Permit no development Within the municipal limits that will cause the level of service
of any state arterial road to decrease below LOS D no sooner than three years prior
to construction funding of the impacted arterial as reflected in the Florida Department
of Transportation's then adopted Five-Year Plan.
OBJECTIVE
E) Create through the configuration of the City-wide collector road system the interaction and
cohesiveness that have been lacking among the residential neighborhoods of Winter Springs,
but do so in a manner that enhances and preserves the quality of life within each community.
Policies
1) Extend the several true collector roads that now end abruptly or degrade from paving
to unimproved status within existing neighborhoods without connection or outlet to
another collector road or arterial, to complete valid collector linkages for these
communities.
fII-4
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
F)
OBJECTIVE
2)
When designing extensions of existing collecror roads to their logical arterial
connection south of the City - the Lake Orive-Seminola Boulevard major collector
that is planned for improvement by the county - choose rights-of-way that minimize
intrusion and cut-through high speed traffic, so that improved traffic circulation is
not at the expense of peaceful habitation.
3)
Plan for completion of the one-ended collector roads in existing developments on a
neighborhood-by-neighborhood basis so that input from the residents is acquired.
4)
The City, shall ensure the provision and maintenance of bicycle and pedestrian
walkways to supplement collector roads between residential areas and parks, schools,
and, other major attractors. Specific provisions for the establishment and
maintenance of bicycle pedestrian walkways shall include, but not necessarily be
limited to the following:
a. The City shall review all proposed development for its accommodation of
bicycle and pedestrian traffic needs.
b.
The land development regulations, shall continue to reqUIre all new
developments to provide bicycle parking space.
c.
Sidewalks or other pedestrian ways shall be provided where feasible and
appropriate along all roadways.
In the design of the municipal collector road system, seize opportunities to solve specific
problems.
Policies.
2)
3)
4)
1) Eliminate landlocked parcels by providing for rights-of-way to reach these properties.
Emphasize improved access for emergency vehicles to secluded areas in the design.
Permit no individual residential driveways onto the collector roads .where feasible.
Encourage "green commerce" aloI?-g the abandoned CSX railroad corridor to create
an open view near any intersections of crossroads and the tracks. Green commerce
is to be defined by the City and shall include such commercial activities as nurseries,
truck farming, and outdoor recreation which does not require large areas of vertical
construction to block the drivers' clear view.
IU-5
I
U
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
(
f
r
J
I,
OBJECTIVE
G) Conserve the natural environment and augment open space in the City as functions of road
development.
Policies
I) Where valid options are available, choose rights-of-way for the City collector system
distant enough from natural drainage features and upland habitats to coexist with
these natural areas.
2) The incursion of a roadway through these natural areas shall be allowed if it benefits
the public need, such as for access by emergency vehicles or transporting school
children, outweighing other concerns.
3) Include in all new road plans adequate right-of-way for potential landscaping and
provide for maintenance, in the annual budget of the City.
, 4) Designate scenic drives along which collector road construction will be adapted to
preserve as much as possible of existing vegetation and canopy.
OBJECTIVE
H) Ensure that current and future rights-of-way are protected from encroachment from structures
or ancillary uses inconsistent with,the designation of rights-of-way. Rights-of-way necessary
for the maintenance of level of service standards and for the safe design of roadways in
accordance with State standards shall be required. Existing rights-of-way shall be preserved
through enforcement of setback provisions, which prevent encroachments into the rights-of-
way.,
Policies.
1) The City, in its land development regulations shall require the dedication of all
needed rights:Of-way and necessary roadway improvements for all new development,
and adopt provisions to protect existing rights-of-way by limiting the use and/or'
encroachment by structures and ancillary uses.
2) The City shall acquire right-of-way for future transportation needs as funds become
available.
UI-6
;
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
r
Existing Conditions
To plan for the future transportation needs of the City of Winter Springs, a complete understanding
of the community's existing transportation system is necessary. This includes a thorough
understanding of existing transportation conditions and existing transportation deficiencies. To
accomplish this, an extensive data collection and review process was accomplished. This effort
included a categorization of the existing roadways in the city and their functional use or
classification, a detailing of existing traffic flows within the city and its surrounding area as revealed
in daily and peak hour traffic counts, a detailing of transportation planning models currently used
in the area including those used by Seminole County and the OUA TS, a detailing of the data
currently used in the area for transportation planning including computer coded networks and
socioeconomic data, and a review of existing transportation plans within the area including the city,
county, and the region.
Study Area - The development of a transportation plan for the City of Winter Springs requires a
detailed analysis of transportation plans and systems in the city and the surrounding area In addition
to the City's Comprehensive Plan, current transportation planning activities generally consider the
entire Orlando urban area which is defined as Seminole, Orange and Osceola County. While the
, City of Winter Springs Transportation Plan must consider the established relationships between the
City and this entire region, a study area for more detailed analysis was defined.
In order to measure the impacts of growth within the City, the study area must include all of the city
and frj.nge areas surrounding the city that affect traffic flows within the city limits. For the purposes
of this analysis, a study area meeting these requirements was developed (see Figure I). This area
is generally bounded on the north by Lake Jessup, on the east by the Eastern Beltway (C.R 417), on
the south by Red Bug Lake Road., and on the west by U.S. 17-92. These boundaries are compatible
with traffic zone boundaries established in the OUA TS and the Seminole County TNfP.
Existing Roadways - The existing roadway system within the study area defined above has been
functionally ciassified in the Orlando Urban Area Transportation Study and in the Seminole County
11vfP. These definitions of roadway usages as seen from the county perspective were reviewed so
that a similar classification "of roadway usage from the City's perspective could be made.
, Functional Classification of Existing System - Seminole County has developed a set of definitions
in order to functionally classify the roadways in the county according to their usage. These
definitions were adopted as a part of this study effort so that compatibility with local planning efforts
could be maintained. Thus, the roads shown in Seminole County traffic segment counts were
functionally classified and were adopted for use in this study. The list of the roadways within the
study area boundary is shown in Table 2. The functional classifications are also shown in Figure 2.
Existing Traffic Counts - Seminole County maintains a comprehensive traffic counting program
within the study area and the city. The most recently published counts from this agency were
reviewed and posted within the study area. These state and county counts were available for 1995
rrI-7
I
~ rit+-~~--!~--"-T-~--l)l I t'f'J I'" 4\~~
I ',/7i~"no:.'~ ' , ,.. ~ ~~ ")~ e. d -:J ~:: : y. '
I rl I I ,I 'LA~,!~",~ ~ r,,;cf j ~ ~ r:l L I ,
I { ~'V' "AAV eo......t:V"'O /i fb. =tJ. .
i~ \1;~' ~ 6-:;:.~~r!~ITJtPhF\ ;J...i._ .' ~ I M I~.
I If f\%- I ,I W!fd~ 1,_ tJ~P% \ U I I ~c-' r ~
~ [~<< I eJ_ l/.k ~ ~ '\::i~- ~
I m"al j ~ILO!l1 i . I, ~~~ ' ; (:-
'.i _/tli~ ~". IJ <J\~ ~Jrg.,;;'1~) \1' 1\ : I!
I ~-~wltl . ~ ,";::1 ~ll ~ : I I I
lrb ';/ 'lk) ~ i ~~(c. ' , ' STUDY ~ .. ~
~ rQIl ~ rs 'f""~' ,I.~. - ~~'" I
JJ _.J:{ I j " . c.:::;- ~~ ::!. _""_'
I I I ,', l 0 -v...- ::J - ~ ~,' - lC '. ' H
-I' 9 ~:"" 1 l/..-.. ry,; ",..' ."", l.@'~ ::~ _:' '1)..' :--. ;
43<< ' I l .' ~ ' , f I' .'. r' ~ )l
. ALTAMONTE "'0 ItVH' ~ / " , ' ~A l
J" .. : I" ~J 1 ~= DVCI "C~oAQAO I / I' I ~;~ >'J'
ra . I I ,. ,//h 0
u, 0 - / ! I. ,:: c1
I ~~~"4T' ~(~~T <' ~;
I I c: :sr;:;:::~, C:J~/.t ";;?'...;..~ ,. U I ;;: I ! I ~ ?: I S 1'77:
'I.,.:r- , ~ I -".o,a J I .L~/i'I'L-
~i ; I~ATO: MA'~i~:~ ~~.~ 4- \l; : ,,~; Ii -I~J~<?~~~
I '~~ " v;~,~ ~~.\~t <~~~~\~t [\I~~fl :o~!^~~: 11' 1!,~~~l[~~
'.'. I ~ i2j 'WINTE~i~~~~/::1.. ~ .3.42..6~ -:. I ""-~:~ Wff~ Vb!
9 \! ~ j ~J.?~f~ ,A~~.~~.:: .~ ,~~~ I /~' ~ ~~ I~~~,~~,.
I '~l,N'7~1f" l"5!5', ~~/~_~'~ -~ ; ~k I ~~\ ~T. :.
'I J ~<~'f:iP~~! .... ~_I_h, !_r,,"'i_") 0 Ii'- I '~
I 1-=-':~t;--< ~.6' ",;,:-:?". ~ ~-~"" ~,' ,-:\I,')' I /~--i~"TU.""""" · .
' Q4 ,'":;.'~ V~: -..'; I /;':>. 55...-=l~ - .~u....~O<.....,...
~~ \ ,.........., .':..'., (\ ~~ C J U' QO
~. -~ " ~,;..... :~T.",~_ ., Q'..'RL::'A.. N" DH 9 c ~ fI ~ ~....' ~ :
,... .' <J k . ___" '.
I ; ~ ~~1~ ~f!;~)") ::,~: '?",-r ,:,':;:' 'f~ .,~ ~:".--~ ,I ii' \ ~ I! i ;
· It: ::;.,\'?,;..-. ,.... ~~ t, It' l ~ U .
· '" - ,., . \ . . rt ' '. > , ~ ~ "
r ;t::--. d';:[~': ~~?--j '0;.; ~e~'~:"';:\PII 1 .-. g ~ ,-'" \ ~~/~ I ~ ~ -
~'~~'; ; .~~~'~l~',-::!,t;ff- "' '~~~' , .eM'"
':~~:: '.;~, ~::::n:..:: ~./."""~,CXHTw&r~1 ~X""':SsWAV ~ _ ....~,c, \~. W%
;,:.7:" , ,. ,.~~H'., ,- e:,.ST ' .. ". ',," I 0.......,.......... ~'~ ~
'i~~i:l"li \~ .~;,~~ \'iEI ;,,';[, ! MY 1',' '". ~u.f~
r f' j}~~ ! IlJ:':J;~G:T 11 i/~fl~tV i n j A WJ!~~ t:~;~
[
Conklin ~ort.r, tlnd Holm..
CG frO) .NaIN.IIRa, INC.
O 110-4 ( ftOOMXF( HR(D
on........,..o<l. f1..Cfl:OA J1l'Jr)1
J Ttl Hll 4Zj.---<}-4.j1
,.....~ .01 lJ."'_10~
SCAlE: N rs
DATE: j-H-97
STUDY AREA LOCA TlON
WINTER SPRlNC'S TRANSPORTATION STUDY
RGURE
1
JJO /10,: MJ<:l9,OI
~
,
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
J
I
I
r
Freewavs
I)
Eastern Beltway (State)
Princioal Arterials (County)
I)
2)
Red Bug Lake Road
Tuskawilla Road
Minor Collectors (County)
Table 2
1996
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION
WINTER SPRINGS TRANSPORTATION STUDY
Principal Arterials (State)
I)
2)
S.R 434
S.R. 419
Maior Collectors (County)
I)
2)
I) Dodd Road
2) Eagle Boulevard
3) Shepard Road - U.S. 17-92 to Winter Springs City Limit
Municipal Collectors (City)
I)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7) ,
8)
9)
10)
11)
12)
13)
14)
15)
'16)
(7) .'
(8)
Bahama Road - Shore Road to Hayes Road
Dolphin Road - Moss Road to Hayes Road
Dyson Road - Tuskawilla Road to Shetland A venue
Edgemon A venue - Panama Road to 'S.R. 419
Fischer Road - Panama Road to E. Lake Drive
Greenbriar Lane - Northern Way to Winter Springs Boulevard
Hayes Road - S.R. 434 to Bahama Road
Moss Road - S.R. 419 to Panama Road
NoribetO'Way - All
Panama Road - Shore Road to Edgemon A venue
Shepard Road - Seminole County Line to End
Sheoah Boulevard - Shepard Road to S.R. 434
Shore Road - Panama Road to End
Winding Hollow Boulevard - S.R. 434 to End
Winter Springs Boulevard - Tuskawilla Road to Eastern Beltway
Trotwood Boulevard - Tuskawilla Road to Northern Way
Tuscora Drive - S.R. 434 to Northern Way
Vista-Willa Drive - S.R. 434 to Northern Way
fII-9
East Lake Drive
Red Bug Lake Road - Tuskawilla
Road to Eastern Beltway
- ,,- ,- '...... '...... - ,~ ...... - ... - - - - - IDB ~ ~
CO)~
;:,
lQJ~
:In
.,
..
... ,,-...
?"p~-'" .,
~ p:z
5S<;>1"\ C II
~ p,,-=
S~~~=c.
.!. 0 ><..
Pt>2::1]:t
~N ~~..'" 0
~S i 3"
o.
. 01
LEGEND:
..... PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL (STATE)
---,- URBAN MINOR ARTERIAL (COUNTY)
MAJOR COLLECTOR (COUNTY)
-.-.-.- MINOR COLLECTOR (COUNTY)
MUNICIPAL COLLECTOR (CITY)
Ci ~ ~
~ r.1 S
I, "" Z
~ ~ L;1
1,., I
'" ..,
o "
~ ~
~~i
~~~
~~~
-u~-<
@~e
~ml2
~UJ~
~ >
o ~
-< (f)
C.
gt-@
,
N2
J)
m
~
-N-
~
N.T.S,
4
-------
(f>>~
:;,
lQ)~'
dn
"'l.
,.
2pQ? ~ ~
~~j:eca
O~' 0 z:;'
~v;:>i~c.
.!.b~O ~
Pt~4:tl ::t
~"''"'''' '" 0
~3. _
~5 i 3
()l)
. lit
g ~ ~
r,1 S
SCREENUNES LEGEND:
-
-
AA
88
CC
.
- -
~
'-' z
~ ~ Vl
t;. ?
.., '"
o .....
~~
h
~C
~rn
~~
Ulr
\)<
~t
pO
~~
~~
O~
-<
-
LAKE DR.
RED BUG LAKE RD.
~~
~
B
~
-N-
~
N,T.S.
r--
.-
.q-
ci
cJ
f-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r
J
J
File Name
LINKS.WSE
GR VTOT96.PRN
HASSIGN.WSE
File Name
LINKSEC. WSE .
GRVTOTEC.PRN
HASSIGN.WEC
File Name
LINKSIO.WSE
GRVTOTIO.WSP
HASSIGN.W8P
Table 10
MODEL V ALIDA nON FILES
(TRANPLAN)/(FSVTMS)
Table 11
E & C FILES
(TRANPLAN)/(FSUTMS)
Table 12
2010 FILES
(TRANPLAN)/(FSUTMS)
-27-
Content
1996 Road Network
Gravity Model-Input
1996 Assignment
Content
1996 + Committed Road
Network
Gravity Model-Input
1996 + Committed
Assignment
, Content
2010 Road Network
Gravity Model-Input
2010 Assignment
.- .- ---- .......
-
----~--
~~
='
(Q)~
~
.,
..
..,~,,-.. ~
~P~~x"
508t'\Q~
;:' ~i='
~~2~~a.
~ b ~)llll
"C~'t~:z:
~"w"'QlO
" 3-
26 - -3
- z
(")~
. .
LEGEND:
000 = 1RAFFIC MODEL
/(000) = EXISllNG VOLUME
'- 0 ~
~ >
F.l S
f? .... z
2j I Vl
""
-
,., I
G, ""
0 "
~
~OO
:DOO
~$:$:
22~;
z :n
8 -
~}>~
~~~
o0~
~<~
}>ot5
:::!r
Oc~
z$:
~rno
0
-<
J]
m@
~
11,500
(9,472)
RED BUG LAKE RD.
33,800
(34,801 )
~
-N-
1
N.T.S.
16600
(15,300)
800
1"-- (1,410)
~
n::
cj
6,500
(12.260)
f-
I
I
I
I
Table 13
SCREENLINE COMPARISONS
1996 MODEL V ALIDA TION
(Average Daily Traffic)
Screenline
Model
lllilli1
Traffic
Cmill!
Percent
Validated
I
J
I
I
I
I
I
AA
BB
CC
25,600
67,600
61,300
25,141
69,029
61,713
1.02
0.98
0.99
Plan Development
In order to detail the transportation improvements that are needed in a particular area, the future
demand for transportation facilities must be quantified. This is normally done by using forecasts of
future socioeconomic activity to generate future trip making potential. These, trips are then assigned
to a network in order to detennine the transporuition facilities necessary to meet these demands. .
Socioeconomic Forecast - The basis for the forecast of socioeconomic (SE) data for the 1996 Winter
Springs Transportation Study outside the City are similar forecasts that are available from OUA TS.
Seminole County also has base year (1995), and 2001 data by OUA TS T AZ. The forecasts for
Winter Springs micro-zones were developed by the consultant with the cooperation of the City of
Winter Springs.
I
I
The 1996 Winter Springs Transportation Study involved the creation of29 micro-zones within the
City as previously described. These micro-zones permitted the kind of detailed analysis of
socioeconomic growth that is critical to the detailed forecasts of future traffic that was required in
order to fully measure transportation impacts on municipal collector streets. This type'of detailed
analysis was accomplished for the micro-zones within the city and changes to the previously
published socioeconomic projections for the city resulted. The final 2010 forecast of socioeconomic
data for the 29 micro-zones within the city is provided in the Appendix. It is important to understand
that this 2010 city projection is based on current vested projects, approved PUDs and growth trends.
It does not assume a high density urban center at S.R. 434 and Tuscawilla Road. 201 OSE data for
the other zones within the region were taken from the OUA TS.
I
I
I
Test Highway Network - The 2010 test network was developed by the City in an attempt to
accommodate the type of 20 I 0 development described above and quantified with SE data in the
Appendix. This network incorporated all of the progranuned improvements from the FOOT and
Seminole County as well as modifications to the 2010 Future Traffic Circulation Map (see
-29-
m
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
J
J
I
Appendix) to respond to the change in land development assumptions and minimize the impact on
residential areas as provided for in the Transportation Goals, Objectives and Policies, previously
described. This test network is illustrated in Figure 7.
An analysis of the assignment of Year 2010 trips to this network is provided in Table 14. It is clear
that LOS D will be exceeded on some major segments and several transportation improvements are
required in the Winter Springs study area in order to satisfy future traffic demands. These needed
improvements are primarily on the arterial system and the responsibility for making most of these
improvements has been undertaken by either the Florida Department of Transportation or Seminole
County.. However, this test assignment also indicates that some improvements are needed on the
local street system. These improvements are the responsibility of the City.
Final Transportation Plan
The results of the assignments to the Test Highway Network were analyzed in order to develop a
final plan that represents the roadway improvements required in the City of Winter Springs and the
study area by 2010 (see Figure 8). These include improvements committed to by FDOT (5 Yr. Plan),
those committed to by Seminole County and in the OUATS 2010 update. These are shown in Table
6. Those improvements needed within the City Limits that are ftmded by sources other than the City
are shown in Table 15. Projects that are the City's responsibility are shown in Table 16.
-30-
------_ammmD<:l!:m
(0)~
~
lQ)~
5n
.,
..
.., rlll~
>P (; .,
~ ~ Z
';05'"' Q II
::P;Qi:s
St:,:J~ Jl c..
l b 3S lit
~t;~~;g:
~N~~"Q
~6i3
(j~
. CI
S.R.
~ 0 /'i
~
Cl r.1 S
z
f? ..., z
~ I vJ
~
>- I
.. ", '"
'"
9 ...,
~
~
:ON
]g f;j
~ffi ,J.
.....
n
~~
~~
~
0
-<
~~
LEGEND:
~~""",
1'""","
SIX LANES
FOUR LANES
TIiREE LANES
TWO LANES
LAKE DR.
RED BUG LAKE RD.
>-
<(
~
....J
W r-...
w:j
zf?
~'--'
(/)
~
;-
~
-N-
~
N.T.S.
..- - - - - - ..- - - - - - - - - .. I!i!m I'im1J
TABLE 14 (I of 3)
YEAR 2010 ROADWA Y LINK LEVELS OF SERVICE
WITH 2010 NETWORK
ROADWA Y FROM TO NO. OF ROADW A Y LOS'D MODEL: VIC RATIO MODEL
LANES CLASS DAlL Y DAlL Y DAILY
CAPACITY VOLUME LOS
U.S. 17-92 S.R. 434 SHEPARD RD. 6 ARTERIAL 41,500 51,200 1.10 F
U.S. 17.92 SHEPARD RD. C.R.419 6 ARTERIAL 41,500 H,200 1.16 F
S.R. O~ U.S. 11.92 MOSS RD. 6 ARTERIAL 41,500 41,800 0.88 D
S.R.43~ MOSS RD. C.R,.c19 ARTERIAL 31,100 26,900 0.81 D
S.R. 434 C.R.419 TUSKA WILLA RD ARTERIAL 31,100 39,000 1.25 F
S.R.04 TUSKAWILLA RD EAS'ffiRN BEL TW A Y ARTERIAL 31,100 42,800 1.38 F
S R. ~ 19 U.S. 11-92 EDGEMON AVE. ARTERIAL 14,300 19,900' 1.39 F
S.R.419 EDGEMON AVE. S.R. 434 ARTERIAL 14,300 16,600 1.16 F
E. LAKE DRIVE SEMINOLA BL YO FISHER ROAD COLLECTOR 22,600 21,500 0.95 D
E LAKE DRIVE FISHER ROAD TUSKAWILLA RD. COLLECTOR 22,600 22,600 1.00 D
TUSKAWILLA RD. RED BUG LJ< RD EAGLE BLVD. 6 ARTERIAL 41,500 39,500 0.83 D
TUSKAWILLA RD. EAGLE BLVD. E. LAKE DRIVE ARTERIAL 31.100 35,500 1.14 F
TUSKAWILLA RD. E. LAKE DRIVE WINTER SPGS. BL VD ARTERIAL 31.100 25,200 0.81 D
TUSKAWILLA RD. WINTER SPGS BL VD TROTWOOD OL VO ARTERIAL 31,100 20.100 0.61 C
TUSKAWILLA RD. TROTWOOD BLVD. S.R.434 ARTERIAL 31,100 20,200 0.65 C
SHEPARD RD. U.S. 11-92 SHEOAH BLVD. COLLECTOR 10,200 11,200 1.10 E
SHEPARD RD. SHEOAH BLVD. EDG EMON AVE. COLLECTOR 10,200 7,900 0.18 D
SHEOAH BL VD. SHEPARD RD. S.R. 434 COLLECTOR 10,200 8,400 0.82 D
BAHAMA ROAD HA YES ROAD WINDINO HOLLOW BL COLLECTOR 10,200 100 0.01 C
MOSS ROAD PANAMA ROAD DOLPHIN ROAD 2 . COLLECTOR 10,200 6,800 0.67 D
MOSS ROAD DOLPHIN ROAD S.R. 434 COLLECTOR 10,200 1,300 0.12 D
111.32
.- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ElIlm mm
TABLE 14 (2 of 3)
YEAR 2010 ROADWAY LINK LEVELS OF SERVICE
WITH 2010 NETWORK
ROADW A Y FROM TO NO. OF ROADWAY LOS D MODEL VIC MODEL
LANES CLASS DA1L Y . DA1L Y RATIO DA1L Y
CAPACITY VOLUME LOS
"10SS ROAD S.R.434 C.R.419 4 COLLECTOR 22,600 14,100 0.62 D
NORTHERN WA Y TROTWOOD BLVD TUSCORA DR. 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 6,100 0.60 D
NORTHERN WAY TUSCORA DR. VIST ^ VILLA DR. 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 3,200 0.31 C
NORTHERN WAY VISTAVILLA DR. WINTER spa BLVD.E 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 3,600 0.35 C
NORTHERN WA Y TROTWOOD BLVD WINTER spa BLVD-S 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 2,500 0.25 C
NORTHERN WA Y WINTER SPG BLVD SHETLAND AVE. 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 3,600 0.35 C
NORTHERN WAY SHETI.AND AVE. GREENBRIAR LN. 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 3,900 0.38 C
NORTHERN WA Y GREENBRIAR LN. WINTER SPRG BLVD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 2,200 0.22 C
TROTWOOD BL VD TUSKAWILLA RD. NORTHERN WAY 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 4,500 0.44 C
WINTER SPG BLVD TUSKAWILLA RD. NORTHERN WAY 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 8,500 0.83 D
WINTER SPG BLVD NORTHERN WAY GREENBRIAR LN. 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 5,600 0.55 D
WINTER SPG 8LVD GREENBRIAR LN. NORTHERN WAY 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 5,000 0.49 C
WINTER SPG BL VD NORTHERN WAY NORTHERN WAY 3 COLLECTOR 12,000 11,100 0.93 D
WINTER SPG 8L VD NORTHERN WAY S.R.426 4 COLLECTOR 22,600 11,900 0.53 D
PANAMA ROAD EDGEMON AYE. MOSS ROAD 2 COLLECTOR' 10,200 9,100 0.89 D
PANAMA ROAD MOSS ROAD SHORE ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 1,300 0.13 C
IlA YES ROAD BAHAMA ROAD DOLPHIN ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 2,000 0.28 C
HA YES ROAD DOLPHIN ROAD S.R,434 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 6,600 0.65 D
DOI.I'IIIN ROAD MOSS ROAD HAYES ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 2,700 0.26 C
FISHER ROAD EAST LAKE DRIVE PANAMA ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 1,400 0.14 C
111.33
.- ~ - ... _. - - ~ ..... -- -- - ~ - - - DiD. ~ ~
(3 of 3)
TABLE 14
YEAR 2010 ROADWA Y LINK LEVELS OF SERVICE
WITH 20 I 0 NETWORK
ROADW A Y FROM Tq NO. OF ROADWAY . LOSD MODEL VIC MODEL
LANES CLASS DAlLY DAlLY RA TIO DAlL Y
CAPACITY VOLUME LOS
TUSCORA DRIVE NORTHERN WAY S.R. 434 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 2,700 0.27 C
VIST A WILLA DR. NORTHERN WAY S.R.434 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 4,000 0.39 C
GREENBRIAR LN. NORTHERN WAY WINTER SPRG BLVD. 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 1,500 0.15 C
DYSON DR. TUSCA WILLA RD. SHETLAND AVE. 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 2,600 0.26 C
SHETLAND AVE. RED BUG LAKE RD DYSON ORNE 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 3,500 0.34 C
SHETLAND AVE. DYSON DRIVE NORTHERN WA Y 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 5,000 0.49 C
EDGEMON AVE. SEMlNOLA BLVD PANAMA ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 9,100 0.89 D
EDGEMON AVE. SHEPARD ROAD S.R.419 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 4,300 0.42 C
EDGEMON AVE. S.R.434 SHEPARD ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 5,600 0.39 D
111-34
-- --- ...s - _. - - - - ... .. _ _ _ _ _ d8I _ I1mim
(O)~
~
lQ)~
5n
.,
...
... Q_ ~ 0
~P~~Z"
';08,", Q II
.......J. ::t-=
~e~~! c..
l I 2
OC~ ;g:J:
~"...~. 0
,," .
gp,-i
- ~ Z
<iO
. l:I
~ 0 /'i
~
0 r.1 S
z
0 ...,
1 z
~ ~ Vl
-. .. I
(.> 0
..:J ...,
....;
- '
~N
:og
U
n
~~
~~
-<
CD~
Ai
EIGHT LANES
SIX LANES
FOUR LANES
TIiREE LANES
TWO LANES
PAYING/DRAINAGE
EXTENSION
TRAFFIC SIGNAL/
INTERSECTION GEOMETRY
LEGEND:
.....
, ~ ').. I I" I,', ',', '.
o
.
.
.
"-I'
f'
::::.
0.
::;:;"
.
&
~4t: p::,
o~ ~
-1-'V z:
~iz? ~
LAKE DR.
WAY
~.
~
~
Vi
RED BUG LAKE RD.
~
-N-
~
N,T.S.
>-
<(
~
GJ-----
w::]
zO
~t:-
(/)
<(
w
;-
-
-
-
.-
-
-
-
-
...-
-
-
.,.-
-
-
-
--
TABLE 5
1996 AVERAGE ANNUAL A.M. AND P.M. PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC COUNT RESULTS
::-
AM PEAK HR PM PEAK AM PEAK PM PEAK
RAW AVERAGE RAW ADJUSTED ADJUSTED
TRAFFIC COUNT ANNUAL ANNUAL ANNUAL ANNUAL
ROADWAY FROM TO COUNTS DATE FOOT ADJ. TRAFFIC TRAFFIC TRAFFIC
TWO WAY 1996 FACTOR TWO WAY TWO WAY TWO WAY
SHEPARD RD U.S. 17-92 SHEOAH BLVD 284 1124 1 290 284 290
SHEOAH BLVD SHEPARD RD. S.~. 434 501 1/25 1 552 501 552
MOSS RD. S.R, 434 . C.R. 419 183 1/24 1 224 183 224
MOSS RD. PANAMA S. ?. 434 371 1/24 1 426 371 426
EDGEMON AVE. SEMINOLA : PANAMA 243 1/25 1 291 243 291
EDGEMON AVE. PANAMA . S.R. 434 381 1/25 1 332 381 332
EDGEMON AVE. S.R, 434 C.R. 419 213 2/6 1 320 213 320
WADE ST. S .R, 434 C,R. 419 108 1/25 1 115 108 115
DOLPHItl RD, HAYES RD. SHORE RD. 26 1/25 1 38 26 38
HAYES RD. PANAMA S,R. 434 319 1/29 1 344 319 344
SHORE RD. PANAMA S.R. 434 38 1/29 1 66 38 66
TROTWOOD BLVD. TUSCAWILLA NORTHERN WAY 444 1/29 1 498 444 498
TROTWOOD BLVD WEST OF TUSKAWILLA 230 1/29 1 204 230 204
NORTHERN WAY WINTER SPRS. BLVD. TROTWOOD BLVD. 212 1/29 1 228 212 228
NORTHERN WAY TROTWOOD BLVD. VISTAWILLA 247 1/30 1 275 247 275
NORTHERN WAY WINTER SPRS. BLVD. SHETLAND 270 1/30 1 301 270 301
NORTHERN WAY GREENBRIAR WINTER SPRS. BLVD 179 1/30 1 210 179 210
VISTAWILLA NORTHERN WAY SENECA 120 1131 1 162 120 162
WINTER SPRS. BLVD TUSCAWILLA NORTHERN WAY 521 1/30 1 709 521 709
WINTER SPRS, BLVD. NORTHERN WAY GREENBRIAR 475 1/31 1 576 475 576
WIlnER SPRS. BLVD. NORTHERN WAY NORTHERN WAY 653 1131 1 765 653 765
WINTER SPRS. BLVD. NORTHERN WAY CITY LIMITS 1043 1/31 1 1211 1043 1211
GREENBRIAR WINTER SPRS. BLVD. NORTHERN WAY 107 1/31 1 129 107 129
DYSON DR. TUSCAWILLA SHETLAND 261 1/31 1 319 261 319
SHETLAND CITRUS RD. DYSON DR. 467 1/31 1 453 467 453
ALTON RD. HAYES SHORE 134 2/1 1 156 134 156
BiRD RD. LAKE DR. NORTH 113 2/1 1 135 113 135
TUSKAWILLA S.R. 434 NORTH 144 2/1 1 162 144 162
TUSCORA NORTHERN WAY SR. 434 77 2/1 1 79 77 79
SENECA WINTER SPRS BLVD. 112 WAY 126 2/1 1 144 126 144
SENECA 112 WAY VISTAWILLA 86 2/1 1 149 86 149
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
r
,
r
Table 6
1996
PROGRAMMED AND PLANNED IDGHWAY SYSTEM II\1PROVEMENTS
WINTER SPRINGS TRANSPORTATION STUDY AREA
Roadway Segment Improvement ProgrammedJ Plannedz
u.s. 17-92 Lake Triplet Drive to Add 2 Lanes 1998
Shepard Road
S.R. 434 S.R. 419 to Tuskawilla Rd. Add 2 Lanes 1997
S.R. 434 Tuskawilla Rd to Eastern Add 2 Lanes 1998
Beltway
Tuskawilla Rd. Dike Rd to Red Bug Lake Add 4 Lanes 1997
Tuskawilla Rd. Red Bug Lake Rd to E. Add 2 Lanes 1998
Lake Drive .
Tuskawilla Rd. E. Lake Drive to Winter Add 2 Lanes 1998
Springs Boulevard
Tuskawilla Rd. Winter Springs Boulevard Add 2 Lanes 1998
to S.R. 434
Lake Drive Seminola Boulevard to Add 2 Lanes 2002
Tuskawilla Road
Moss Road S.R. 434 to S.R. 419 Add 2 Lanes 2000
Winter Park Dr. Wilshire Dr. to Seminola Add Turn Lanes 1997
Boulevard
S.R. 434 U.S. 17-92 to S.R. 419 Add 2 Lanes 2010]
(6 Total)
S.R. 434 S.R. 419 to Eastern Beltway Add 2 Lanes 2010
(6 Total)
U.S. 17-92 Shepard Road to Airport Add 2 Lanes 2010
Boulevard
Red Bug Lake Rd Tuskawilla Rd. to S.R. 426 Add 2 Lanes 2010
1. Contained in construction program of FDOT or Seminole County.
2. Contained in OUA TS 20 I 0 Plan Update (Adopted Highway Needs Network).
3. Latest date based on need. This applies to all "2010" numbers in this column.
1I1-15
I
I
I
I
Level of Service Policies - Level of service (LOS) standards are essential for transportation
planning to determine both existing traffic conditions as well as project future deficiencies and
required facility improvements. The LOS of a roadway or roadway section analyzes the
condition of an existing facility in terms of its operating condition. There are six levels of
service used in transportation planning that are ranked in descending order of safety and
convenience of travel from level A to level F. A description of the accepted service levels is as
follows:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,.
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
Level of Service
Description
A
Highest quality of service a particular road segment can
provide. General condition of free flow in which there is
very little or no restriction on spread or maneuverability
caused by the presence of other vehicles.
B
Reasonable unimpeded traffic and stable flow. Ability to
maneuver within the traffic stream is only slightly
restricted, and stopping delays are not botherSome.
C
Characterized by stable flow, but restrictions in freedom to
select speed, to charige lanes, or to pass is becoming
restricted for most drivers.
D
Approaching unstable flow. Tolerable average operating
speeds are generally maintained but are subject to
considerable and sudden variation. Driving comfort and
freedom to maneuver are low because of increased lane
density, adverse signal progression, inappropriate signal
timing, or some combination of these factors.
E
--Indicates significant delays and lower operating speeds.
Suc.h operations are caused by some combination of
adverse progression, high signal density, extensive queuing
at critical intersections, and inappropriate signal timing.
Driving comfort is low and accidental potential is high.
F
Forced flow operations at extremely low speeds. Roadway
tends to act as a storage area and intersection congestion is
likely at critical signalized intersections, with high
approach delays resulting. Adverse signal progression is
frequently a contributor to this condition.
Ill-I 6
I
I
I
I
J
,
I
I
I
I
t
J
I
f
J
I
I
The FDOT outlined in their Florida's Level of Service Standards and Guidelines Manu<!l
for Planning (1995) the minimum acceptable operating LOS standards, as presented below.
TABLE 7
STATEWIDE MINIMUM LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS
FOR THE STATE IllGHWAY SYSTEM
(Urbanized Areas Over 500,000)
Transitioning
Existing Inside Transportation Urbanized or
Urbanized Concurrency Management Incorporated Rural
. Roadway Type Areas Areas Areas Areas
Freeways D D C B
Other Multi-lane D . C B
Two-lane D . C C
*Means the level of service standard will be set in a transportation mobility element that meets requirements of Rule
91-5.0057.
The City of Winter Springs falls into the category of "Inside Transportation ConcUrrency
Management Areas" for the purposes of determining LOS standards. Lacking the concurrency
management designation, the City is part of the existing Orlando Urbanized Area as defined by
FDOT and the MFO which requires LOS D.
Seminole County has determined that Tuskawilla Road within the City limits falls within an
Urban Center Traffic Impact Area. The County's strategy, as per their Traffic Circulation
Support Document Volume IV of the 1991 plan update, allows a LOS E within these areas while
a LOS D is the minimum standard outside of the defined area.
In accord with the.Comprehensive Plan and previously adopted standards, Level of Se~ce "D"
conditions on all roads within the City of Winter Springs and the study area was used as the
minimum standard. This corresponds with FDOT recommendations shown in Table 7 above.
Level of Service standards have been reduced to daily roadway capacity (service volumes) terms
in order to permit assessment of both existing and forecast conditions. The FDOT daily roadway
capacities as shown in Table 8 for LOS D were used (circled service volumes).
Existing Deficiencies - Given the standards defmed above, the existing roadway system in the
study area and the City of Winter Springs were evaluated. This evaluation was based upon
existing roadway volumes as documented in the previous discussion on traffic counts.
These analyses indicate that many roadways on the state and county system within the study area
were not operating within LOS 0 in 1996 (see Figure 3). Almost all are contained in Table 6 as
committed improvement projects. However, the following are not and need immediate attention:
lfI-17
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(
I
TABLE 8
GENERAUZED A.NNUAL AVERAGE DAley VOLUMES FOR FLORlDA'S
URBANIZED AREAS'"
STATE lWO- WAY ARTERlAl.S fREEWAYS
UNINTE:RRUrTED FLOW Group 1 (witbin "rblllW:d uea over S<XJ.CXXlIJId ~ac 10 or pusinc
within 5 milea oC Ibc prinury city cenln! lxainaa dis1ria)
Unsi~ Level oC ~
LAvet 0{ SeNioe l..aJ>e2 A B C D E
uoa A B C 0 E 4 22.CXXl 35.200 52,900 67,000 SO,800
2 UDdiy. 8,900 13,900 18,900 24,800 33,100 6 33,100 52.900 79,400 100,600 126.900
4 Diy. 21..soo 35,800 SO, 100 60,100 71,600 8 <<,100 7O..soo 105,900 13-4,100 169 ,100
6 Diy. 32.200 53,700 75,200 90,200 107,<100 10 5.5.200 88,200 132.<400 167,700 211,<400
12 63,200 101,100 1.S1,700 192.200 242..300
lNrEUUPTED fLOW
Group 2 (withiA wtnniz.cd Ira and DOl ia Group 1)
a....1a (>0.00 10 2.49Iig~ 1at.erscctioas pet mile) Levd o! ScMOl
l..cvd oC Sc:vicc l..ulc:s A B C D E
UACS A" B C D... E... 4 20,300 32,500 48.,800 61,800 7-4..soo
2 Ulldiy. 12.600 1.5,200 16,600 17,000 c 6 30,600 48.900 73, <400 93,000 117,.300
4 Diy. Xl,900 33,JOO .35,700 15,800 L 8 40.800 6.5,200 97,900 124,000 156,300
6 Div. 43.200 50,<400 53,700 53,700 A 10 51,000 81,.500 lZ2,JOO 155,000 195,400
8 Div. 53,BOO 62,000 . 6.5,800 6S.BOO s 12 58,400 ~,200 140.coo 171,300 223.,600
s
Oa.u Ib (2..50 10 4.50 siglUlizcd iataxdloas per mile)
Levd ot Savice
C
8,800
19,200
29 ,JOO
15.800
l..ulc:s
2 Undiv.
-4 Diy.
6 Diy.
8 Diy.
A..
BOO
E
15,900
J4,CXXl
51,<100
61.900
CIas.s U (more tlu..a 4.50 signaliud mlencctioa.1 pct mile and DOC
withla primuy city cclltn! business distriCl ot urb&.aizz:d
lrea over SOO,lXlO)
l..cvd of Servio:
\...1ncs AU BOO C" D E
2 Undiv. 1\ ,800 15,200
4 Diy; 26,500 33,<100
6 Diy. 40,700 50,600
8 Diy. 49,700 61,800
C1.au UI (men: thaa 4..so sip.ali%lOd ialcDcc:tious pct.mUc llDd wi~
primuy city cartn.l bu.sinc:u dUtria oC "rb~
UCI 0VC1' 500.000)
Lcvcl ot Sctvio:
Lanc:s A.. B.. C". 0 E
2 Undiy. 13 ,200 1-4,800
-4 Diy. 29.soo 32.600
6 Diy. .c..4,800 49,JOO
8 Diy. s.c,700 60,100
NON-SrATEROADWAYS
MNOR crrY/COUNTY ROADWAYS
Level 0( Service
l..ulc:s AU BOO C ~ E
2Undiv 10,900 15..soo
4 Div. 24,400 33,200
6 Div. 37,800 47,.500 50,200
OTIIER SIGNALIZED ROADWAYS
c (sipulized inu:occ:tioa 1lII1ys.is)
L Lcvd of Sctvio:
A Lalle3 AU BOO C E
s 2 UDdiy 5,100 1\,700
s 4 Div. 11400 :!5loo
\I
C
L
A
S
S
III
Lanc:s
2
2
Multi
MllIu
ADJUSTMENTS
DMDEDtUNDrvIDED
(aller com::sponding two-way vol umc indicated pc:rcen()
Mcdba Ld~ T"rlI s..ys Adju3lmcnl F&CIo~
OiYi4a:t Yes +S'K>
UadhOScd No .~
U DdMdaI Y c:s .S'K>
UDdMcW No -2S'K>
ONE-WAY
(all<< corrupocu1ia~ two-way VQlwnc IAdic:atcd pct=at)
One- W.J Corrc:spocw1i iii Ad jlQlment
u.ncs Two- W. Y Lanc:s FIdOC'
2 4 -4O'Jo
J 6 -4()'J,
4 6 -4O'l'
5 8 -2S'K>
no....... w. _ __. __...t _boo _.-, be c--oI....-.c ~ Tho ~.....- _ _......"..;, ""'-l ~ be _ b ____ ~P'-"'c ~
'TN ~.....t~ ~ roddt. ~.,c bill..... br -"b Of' ~o.-~ ~..,.,. ~ ~ cU.t. v.................-. _ --J ~ dlMy ~ (AADT)--:-- ~
('--d ... IC.. _ _ """" .. 4Jy """"I be I..dI 0{ -.,;",., .... ... .......... .. ..... H~, ~ 104-..1 U,.... oM flo<Ido onIl\c. -..., ~ ~...... T100c t.b4oo. _
&Ad "-'-' 01 ~ c::r-i. ~ 0.- Ow b.d...
~b-..dIt""""""
Vol_ ......cx-.~ ~ -----=-~ c~..... ~
f"\o.od.~c.-llolT~It't1.
~O[:
...,rxn
~
III-iS
(0)~
=
lQ)~
5n
..,
...
.., Q- III e
d= - ..,
~ ;>~ z
~~~'"' ell
Q" ~ z ~
:>Y6!1Ilc..
looQ ..
o~~~;g :::
l:....~~~ ~
~B i 3
ne
. II
L. 0 ~ S.R.
B >
r.1 S
P u z
b I vJ
N
~ 0
(" I
'" '"
0 ...,
~$
]01
~~
~~
ti50
-om
0]]
~Q
~m
::J~
0-
zm
~
0
-<
w2
:0
m
- - - - ,- - .- - - - - - - ... IIl!llilD BmS
LEGEND:
~
-N-
~
DEFICIENT (EXCEEDS LOS D)
N.T.S,
(!)
z
. ~ ~
f7i<(
l'
,....
"<t
0:;
U
LAKE DR.
RED BUG LAKE RD.
WAY
~'
'{'"
Cl
Z
<(
~
:r:
Vl
1W
II
,
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r
r
r
1. S.R. 419 - U.S. 17-92 to Moss Road.
2. U.S. 17-92 - Shepard Road to S.R. 419.
J. Red Bug Lake Road - Winter Park Drive to Tuskawilla Road.
U.S. 17-92 is in the long range plans of the MPO (OUATS); however, it is very deficient and
should be moved to the FDOT five-year COnstruction program. Neither the.S.R. 419 nor Red
Bug Lake Road sections mentioned above are contained on any programmed or planned 2010
improvements list. There are no municipal collector facilities within the City of Winter Springs
operating at a LOS of less than D in 1996.
Model Development and Validation
To adequately forecast future traffic conditions in a rapidly urbanizing area such as the City of
Winter Springs, a set of transportation planning models must be developed and validated. In the case
of the City of Winter Springs, such models exist and these models have been previously used to
develop City, regional and county-wide plans. These models are contained in the model set
docwnented for the Orlando Urban Area Transportation Study.
In order to provide the more detailed analysis required for the City of Winter Springs, this model set
was modified. These modifications include the development of a more detailed T AZ set
(microzones), a more detailed highway network, and the use of TRANPLAN/FSutMS model
structure. These changes require the validation of the model set used in this process even though this
model set is derived from and closely resembles the OUATS model set.
The model set used was originally tested and confirmed in the Casselberry Transportation Plan and
Impact Fee Study. It is derived from and based upon the OUATS model set; This model set has
been modified as detailed below. .
OUA TS Model Set - The transportation planning models used in the Orlando Urban Area
Transportation Study have-evolved from a s.et of models developed in the mid-sixties and based upon
extensive home interviews conducted..at-lhat.time. The model set is divided into four general
functions and modifications to each of these functions have occurred over the last twenty-five years.
. Trip Generation - The existing OUATS trip generation model is a cross-classification person trip
production model with attractions calculated using expressions derived from regression analysis.
This model currently uses 11 purposes including special generator purposes for the major tourist
attractions, the various universities and colleges in the region, and the Orlando International Airport.
The model requires extensive data not generally available such as the forecast of the median income
and car ownership by zone for the calculation of home-based productions.
Trip Distribution - The OUA TS trip distribution model utilizes each of the 11 purposes for which
productions and attractions are generated. Friction factors for each of these II purposes have been
developed, although the special generator purposes generally borrow friction factors from other
-20-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r
I
I
purposes. There are not K-factors utilized in the model.
Modal Split! Auto Occupancy - The OUA TS model set includes a multi-nomiallogit expression for
calculation of splits of trips to the transit sector. Auto occupancy is calculated with simple rates by
purpose. The modal split model is system-sensitive in that it requires the coded description of a
transit system.
Traffic Assignment - The current OUA TS traffic assignment procedure consists of a 4-iteration
equilibrium assignment with capacity restraint. This process is applied using network descriptions
in accordance with the 1979 version of the Urban Transportation Planning System (UTPS)
developed by the US Department of Transportation.
Trip Generation Modifications - In order to make use of the data available from Seminole County
and to avoid the necessity to forecast income and car ownership as required by the OUA TS trip
generation model, modifications were made to this model. The trip generation models used are
based upon the OUA TS models, but these models incorporate simpler rate expressions instead of
the more complex cross-classification models. These models have successfully been used numerous
times in the Orlando area including Casselberry and for Seminole County projects.' In addition to
the Transportation Plan and Impact Fee Study in Casselberry, the models were used to forecast trip
generation for the Lake Mary Boulevard Corridor Study and the Lake Mary/I-4 interchange study
for the Florida Department of Transportation. The models forecast vehicle trips instead of person
trips so they additionally do not require a separate auto occupancy model. The structure of the trip
generation statements used as input to the model validation procedure are detailed in Table 9. The
input socio-economic data for the Winter Springs traffic zones (Figure 4) was approved by the City
for 1996 and 2010 (see Appendix). All other zones used Seminole County or OUA TS data (in
Orange County).
Use of OUA TS 11 Trip Purpose Models - Since trip generation expressions were available for each
of the OUATS non-special generator purposes, it was decided to use the entire 11 purpose models
available in OUA TS. 1bi3 required incorporating the special generator expressions available' from
OUATS into the Winter Springs Model Set. This use of the full OUATS model purposes
additionally permitted use of the OUATS friction factors.
-21-
TABLE 9
TRIP GENERATION EXPRESSIONS (VEHICLE TRlPS)
Winter SpriogsTransportation Study - 1996
PRODUCTION EOUA TrONS
1.41 (Dwelling Units) + 0.32 (Hotel-Motel Rooms)
1.37 (Dwelling Units) + 0.48 (Hotel-Motel Rooms)
= 0.68 (Dwelling Units) + 0.48 (Hotel-Motel Rooms)
= 0.76 (Dwelling Units) + 0.96 (Hotel-Motel Rooms)
= 0.83 (Dwelling Units)
= Same as attractions
A ITRACTION EOUA TrONS
= 0.43 Retail Employment + 1.13 Other Employment -S.15
= 4.20 Retail Employment + 12.06
= 0.23 Single Dwelling Units + 0.54 Hotel-Motel Units
+ 0.59 Total Employment - 11.05
= 0.30 Total Dwelling Units + 0.84 High School Attendance
+ 0.69 Retail Employment + 19.25
= 0.08 (1-6 Attendance) + 0.13 (7-12) Attendance) + 3.02
= 0.56 Total Dwelling Units + 3.80 Retail Employment
+ 0.32 Total Employment + 6.52
OTHER TRIP PURPOSE PRODUCTION AND A ITRACTrON
= 0.96 Retail Employment + 0.37 Total Dwelling Units
+ 0.14 Other Employment + 27.56
= Truck Trip Production
= 0.42 Retail Employment + 0.12 Total Dwelling Units
+ 0.13 Hotel-Motel Units + 0.01 Other Employment + 24.36
= Calculated Through the Use of Growth Factors
-22-
- - - - _ IIlIlIIICIIII Cli:l:lllQ
~~
:J N
lQ)~ ~
--
5n 1
.,
..
"'-\1-"~
~p - .,
pz
008,", Q II
;:. Q z::l
o~;~.. c..
:.. b ~ ..
Ot~ ::oX
:s......~., Q
~~:. 3'
- - z
(j~
.
'- 0 ~
8 ~
~ ~
z F,;
<:>
'-' z
~ I vJ
N
0
>- I
'"
"" '"
0 ...,
~
~
:0
~
;g~
~~
~J
ON
~~
~m
SU:l
z
~
0
-<
~~
~
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
MASTER PLANNING MAP
OCTOBER 1996 .
111;0 . ,U.Jg ~
~ '
"'-"(... .UI
UK[
~
I
QUA TS Highway Network Modifications - The micro-computer process selected for use in this
Winter Springs Transportation Study is the TRANPLAN battery of programs as incorporated by the
Florida Department of Transportation into Micro-FSUTMS. This battery of programs was
developed by the Florida Department of Transportation in order to provide a standardized tool to
local planners throughout the state. This model is designed to enable the local planner to utilize the
data files and routines available throughout the State of Florida on micro-computers.
I
.,
I
The regional network chosen for use in both Casselberry and Winter Springs was used by Seminole
County in the development of their Transportation Management Program (TMP). This network
required some modifications as zone sizes are extremely large.
J
I
I
I
Zone Structure Modifications - In order to conduct the detailed analysis required in this effort,
modifications to the zone structure incorporated above were required. The Seminole County
network and zone structure used as input included only 300 zones for the entire three county region
including 91 zones in. Seminole County. The resultant highway network was equally coarse. This
network and zone structure was subdivided into new zones compatible with the detailed highway
network previously described. Since the zone structure in Casselberry was previously developed
for a very detailed study, it was retained outside the City of Winter Springs. The resulting network
contained 400 zones with 29 micro-zones within the City of Winter Springs and 86 in the
Casselberry area Micro-zones used in the City of Winter Springs are shown in Figure 4 and those
in Casselberry are provided in the Appendix.
I
I
I
I
I
I
Winter Springs Transportation Network - Since the OUA TS basic network was utilized as a skeleton
for the Winter Springs Study, roadways had to be added to the model structure. Existing major
roadways in the planning area are:
1. S.R. 434
2. Tuscawilla Road
3. Red Bug Lake Road
4. S.R. 436
5. U.S. 17-92
6. Seminola Boulevard-Lake Drive
7. S.R. 419
8. Winter Park Drive
9. S.R.426
Roadways added to the Winter Springs Network in this study are:
1. Northern Way
2. Winter Springs Boulevard
3. Dyson Road
4. Trotwood Boulevard
5. Panama Road
-24-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Hayes Road
Moss Road
Edgemon A venue
Sheoah Boulevard
Sheparel Road
Shore Road
The complete 1996 network used in this study is shown in Figure 2, 1996 Existing Roadway
Classification and Number of Lanes.
Model Validation
As a means of checking and validating travel inventories, several screenlines are normally defined
which would completely bisect the planning area. Screenlines should follow natural topographic
features and cut as few major streets as possible to minimize the cost of travel inventories which
would be conducted at those points. In the Winter Springs planning area, there are thfee screenlines.
Screenline A runs east-west, and Screenlines B and C run north-south. These screenlines are shown
in Figure 5.
Model validation was accomplished by loading of the current trip table (1996) on the network (see
Appendix for Traffic Assignment Node Map) and comparing assigned volumes to observed volumes
as determined by traffic counts. The FSUlMSrrRANPLAN computer programs examine the paths
from origin to destination to determine which links are used and then accumulates trips from the
origins to destinations on the links. Capacity restraint was used in the process of calibration to
change link speeds in response to loaded volumes with the objective of providing realistic
assignments. The files necessary to reproduce the 1996 E + C and 2010 traffic are shown in Tables .
10, 11 and 12, provided to the City along with the fmal report.
An Equilibrium Assignment (FSUTMS) was used to have a more balanced loading on the network.
Table 13 shows the screenline results on screenlines A, B and C in the Winter Springs area The
overall amount of trips are correct with very slight differences on both north-south and east-west
screenlines. As can be seen from Figure 6, most links in the Winter Springs network had very
acc~ptable assignment loadings.
-25-
~
m
I
I
TURN LANE POLICY
LEN TURN LANES
1. A left turn lane on the major cross street will be required when any two (2) or more of the
following warrants are satisfied:
I
a.
Posted speed limit is equal to or greater than thirty-five (35) mph.
I
I
I
I
J
I
b. Number of Left Turn Movements
1. On multi-lane fa~ilities, the number of left turning vehicles from the major
roadway is equal to or weater than fifteen (15) during either the A.M. or PlM.
peak hour of the major street.
2. On two (2) lane two-way facilities, the number of left turning vehicles from
the major roadway is equal to or greater than ten (to) and the opposing
through traffic volume exceeds three hundred and fifty (350) vehicles during
either the A.M. or P.M. peak hour.
c.
Available Sight Distance
If the available sight distance for left turning vehicles to observe approaching traffic
or for approaching traffic moving in either direction to observe the left turning
vehicle is less than the value shown in Table A-I for the posted speed of the major
street.
. d. Access Control
L The street has been designated as a controlled access facility by Seminole
County, mOT, or the City of Winter Springs.
2. The roadway is a multi-lane divided facility and there is sufficient room in
the median to allow construction of a left turn lane.
e. Traffic Control
The intersecting minor street or access point driveway is controlled by a traffic signal.
2. Separate left turn lanes are required on the intersecting minor streets or access point
driveways when any two (2) or more of the following warrants are satisfied:
rV-14
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(
I
I
I
a. Posted Speed Limit
When the posted speed limit of the intersecting street or access point driveway is
equal to or greater than thirty (30) mph.
b. Number of Turning Vehicles
When the number of left turning vehicles from the intersecting street or access point
driveway is equal to or greater than sixty (60) vehicles during either A.M. or P.M.
peak hour of the arterial street.
c. Available Sight Distance
Available sight distance is not an applicable warrant in this case.
d. When the street which is being entered has been designated as a controlled access
facility by Seminole County, FDOT, or the City of Winter Springs.
e. Traffic Control
When the intersecting street or access point driveway is controlled by a traffic signal.
DECELERA nON AND RIGHT TURN LANES
1. A deceleration and right turn lane on the major street will be required when any two (2) or
more of the following warrants are satisfied:
a. Posted major street speed limit is equal to or greater than forty (40) mph.
b. Number of right turning movements from the major roadway is equal to or greater
than thirty (30) during either the A.M. or P.M. peak hour of the major street.
c. Available Sight Distance
If the available sight distance for a right turning vehicle to be seen 'by through traffic
traveling in the same direction is less than the value showri in Table A-I for the
posted speed limit of the major street.
d. Major street has been designated.as a controlled access facility by Seminole County,
FDOT, or the City of Winter Springs.
[V-IS
m
I
B
I
I
I
I
e.
Traffic Cootrol
Intersecting street or access point driveway is controlled by a traffic signal.
2.
Separate right turn lanes are required on a minor intersection street or access point driveway
whenever any two (2) or more of the following warrants are satisfied:
a.
Posted speed limit of the intersecting or access point driveway is equal to or greater
than thirty (30) mph.
b.
Number of right turning vehicles from the intersecting street or access point driveway
is equal to or greater than sixty (60) during either the A.M. or P.M. peak hour of the
major street.
c.
Available sight distance is not an applicable warrant in this case.
d. Access Control
If the arterial street which is being entered has been designated as a controlled access
facility by Seminole County, FDOT, or the City of Winter Springs.
e. Traffic Control
1. Intersecting street or access point driveway is controlled by a traffic signal.
2. An acceleration lane is provided on the arterial street and the right turn
movement is not controlled by a yield or stop sign.
fV-16
m
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 20
SIGHT DISTANCE FOR TURN LANE POLICY
(Rounded Values)
POSTED SPEED (MPH)
20
30
40
50
60
STOPPING SIGHT DIST ANtE
Minimum (IT) 125 200 275 400. 525
Desirable (IT) 200 250 375 475 650
[V-17
III
11
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(
(
[
APPENDIX
- - -. - IB!llI GlmI m:m
TABLE A-1
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
. .
PUBLIC WORKS - LOCAL OPTION GAS TAX
PROPOSED PROJECT EXPENDITURES BY YEAR
Project Year 1 Year2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total Prior
Project Name Number 97/98 98/99 99/00 00/01 01/02
Wagners Curve Removal 97..4411-062 $80 000 $80 000
Public Works Compound 99-4411-063 $60 000 $60,000 $60 000 $60 000 $240 000
Resurfacinq 98-4411-064 $150000 $150000 $150000 $150000 $150000 $750 000
Underdrains 98-4411-065 $50 000 $50 000 $50 000 $150000
TOTAL ; $280 000 $210000 $260 000 $210000 $260 000 $1,220000 $0
,
PROPOSED PROJECT REVENUE SOURCE BY YEAR
...
v
r.
~
~.
Project Year 1 Year2 Year3 Year 4 Year 5 Total Prior
Revenue Source Number 97/98 98/99 99/00 00/01 01/02
Local Option Gas Tax 97-4411-062 $80 000 $80 000
Local Option Gas Tax 99-4411-063 $60 000 $60 000 $60 000 $60 000 $240 000
Local Option Gas Tax 98-4411-064 $150000 $150000 $150000 $150000 $150000 $750000
Local Option Gas Tax 98-4411-065 $50 000 $50 000 $50 000 $150000
TOTAL $280 000 $210000 $260 000 $210000 $260,000 $1,220000 $0
PROPOSED EQUIPMENT EXPENDITURES BY YEAR
Project \ Year 1 Year2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total Prior
~guipment Name Number 97/98 98/99 99/00 00/01 01/02
Vehicle 98-4411-066 $26,000 $20 500 $21 000 $67 500
TOTAL $26 000 $20 500 $0 $21 000 $0 $67 500 $0
PROPOSED EQUIPMENT REVENUE SOURCE BY YEAR
Project : Year 1 Year2 Year 3 . Year 4 Year 5 Total Prior
Revenue Source Number .: 97/98 98/99 , 99/00 00/01 01/02
I Local Option Gas Tax 98-4411-066 $26 000 $20,500 $21,000 $67 500
ITOTAL $26 000 $20,500 $0 $21 000 $0 $67 500 $0
-
-
-
-
-
-
IE1I
eml
rmml
TABLE A-2
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
LOCAL OPTION GAS TAX
Historical Data
FY 91 FY 92 FY93 FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 96 FY 99 FY 2000
TRANSPORTA TION IMPROVEMENT FUND ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECT/ON PROJECTION
REVENUES:
INTERGOVERNMENT AL REVENUES $266,779 $245,312 S237,753 $205,765 $221,616 $224,256 $245,644 S257,926 $270,822 $284,363
INTEREST '$35,483 S31,427 S13,261 S26,604 $30,451 $17,000 S25,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000
MISCELLANEOUS SO SO SO $0 SO SO SO so $0 SO
TOT AL REVENUES $304,262 $276.739 S251,014 $232,369 S252,267 S241,256 S270,644 S277,926 $290,822 $304,363
PERCENT INCREASE 5.14% -9.05% -9.30% -7.43% 6.56% -4.36% 10.11% 4.62% 4.64% 4.66%
> RECURRING EXPENSES: S30,073 $19,901 $24,913 $28,556 $96,028 $197,500 S50,OOO $75,000 $75,000 $75,000
:;:::
Q
is.. RECURRING CAPITAL OUTLAY $165,872 $366,256 S228,259 $0 $355,147 $344,804 $258,050 $250,000 $200,000 $200,000
~.
I"
TOTAL EXPENSES $195,945 $386,157 $253,172 $28,556 $451,175 $542,304 $308,050 $325,000 $275,000 $275,000
PERCENT INCREASE 3.74% 97.07% -34.44% -88.72% 1479.97% 20.20% -43.20% 5.50% -15.38% 0.00%
REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENSES $106,317 ($109,418) ($2,156) $203,613 ($198,908) ($301,048) ($37,406) ($47,074) $15,822 $29,363
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $505,352 $613,6G9 $504,251 $502,093 $705,906 $506,996 $205,950 $166,544 $121,470 $137,292
ENDING FUND BALANCE $613,669 $504,251 $502,093 $705,906 $506,996 $205,950 $166,544 $121,470 $137,292 $166,655
-------~~
TABLE A-3
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE FUND
FROM ANNUAL AUDIT
FY 93/94 FY 94/95
Actual Actual
Revenues:
Taxes
Fees' $571,213 $278,084
Intergovernmental revenues
Fines and forfeitures
Interest $32,495 $79,851
Miscellaneous
Total revenues $603,708 $357,935
>
" Expenditures:
'C
~ Current
x General government
'-'
Public safety
Transportation $10,444 $290
Capital outlay $107,297 $78,792
. Total expenditures $117,741 $79,082
Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues Over (Under)
Expenditures $485,967 $278,853
Other Financing Sources (Uses):
Operating transfers In
Operating transfers out
Total other financing sources (uses)
Excess of Revenues and Other Financing Sources
Over (Under) Expenditures and Other Uses $485,967 $278,853
Fund Balances, October 1, 1993/94 $1,109,406 $1,595,373
Fund Balances, September 30, 1994/95 $1 ,595,373 $1 ,874,226
-------DIIII-IIil!i!iIDm!i~
TABLE A-4
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
FINAL BUDGET FIGURES
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES
REVENUES & EXPENDITURES (UNAUDITED)
Description of Revenue
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE FUND
Impact Fees Collected .
Interest Earned
Amended "To Dale
FY 95/96 FY 96/97 FY 96/97
Actual Budget Actual
$282,993 $310,436 $158,121
$91,583 $50,900 $39,903
$374,576 $361,336 $198,024
$0 $1,470,164 $268,765
$374,576 $1,831,500 $-<166,789
~
...
.;,:)
3
0-
;;<.
1..
TOTAL TRANSP, IMPACT FEE REVENUE
APPROPRIATION FROM FUND BALANCE
TOTAL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE REVENUES
AND APPROPRIATION FROM FUND BALANCE
Account No. Description of Expenditure
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE FUND
53180 Consulting Services
54620 Signalization
56310 Capital Improvements
56930 Reserves
$92,613 $107,000 $77,111
$0 $21,000 $0
$0 $1,703,500 $399,678
$0 $0 $0
$92,613 $1,831,500 $466,789
$281,963 $0 $0
$374,576 $1,831,500 $-<166,789
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
APPROPRIATION TO FUND BALANCE
TOTAL EXPENSE AND APPROPRIATION
TO FUND BALANCE
CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE
FUND BALANCE - O~tober 1,'.
Appropriations to (from) Fund Balance
FUND BALANCE - September 30,
.. $1,874,226
$281,963
$2,156,189
$2,156,189
($1,470,164)
$686,025
$2,156,189
($268,765 )
$1 ,887,424
. To Date: -<1/15/97
-....,...,..-....-----~am
TAilLE A-5
-5
~
5-
~.
I
l/>
October 1996 City of Winter Springs Existing Socioeconomics Data
Seminole Subzone Existing Existing Existing Existing Existing Total School School
County Single Multi-Family Industrial Commercial SeNiee Employment Enrollment Enrollment
Traffie Zone Familv DU DU Emplovment Emplovment Emplovment K-8 9-12
70 71 0 '0 0 0 0 0 0
776 60 0 0 0 0 0 0
72 72 113 0 0 0 0 0 0
778 454 0 0 0 15 15 0
82 82 1132 0 0 9 30 39 0
83 83 5.45 0 0 104 0 104 0
780 120 0 10 0 10 20 0
781 940 0 0 30 0 30 0
782 129 0 0 0 0 0 0
84 84 44 0 72 0 67 139 0
783 243 388 166 10 54 230 2450'
85 85 O. 0 0 26 0 26 0
86 86 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
785 25 0 0 54 0 54 0 2715
87 87 97 0 0 6 72 78 0
786 473 0 0 0 0 0 0
787 370 0 0 0 0 0 0
88 88 20 0 0 0 11 11 0
788 477 0 0 0 0 0 0
789 103 0 0 0 0 0 0
89 89 156 0 0 3 8 11 0
90 90 359 0 0 11 55 66 0
790 441 32 0 40 0 40 0
791 227 157 0 0 0 0 0
91 91 955 40 0 96 0 96 1200
92 92 633 392 6 124 304 434 0
93 93 2 0 412 8 27 447 0
94 94 449 622 1340 '531 568 2439 815
95 95' 327 796 110 227 457 794 0
TOTALS: 8897 2427 2116 1279 1678 5073 4465 27'15
~
]
0-
\<.
6-
--------..i1'EI8llliD
TABLE A-6
City of Winter Springs 2010 Socioeconomics Data Projections
Seminole Subzone Existing Existing Existing Existing Existing Total School School
County Single Multi-Family Industrial Commercial Service Employment Enrollment Enrollment
Traffic Zone Family DU DU Employment Employment Employment K-8 9-12
70 71 62 100 0 100 0 100 0
776' 118 40 0 100 0 100 0
72 72 346 0 0 640 0 1328 0
778 468 0 0 0 30 30 0
82 82 1371 16 0 9 30 39 0
83 83 585 0 0 104 0 104 0
780 127 0 15 0 325 340 0
781 1031 0 0 30 0 30 0
782 129 0 0 0 0 0 0
84 84 92 0 72 0 67 139 0
783 243 460 166 10 54 230 2458
85 85 31 0 26 1080 72 1178 0
86 86 89 140 12 100 0 112 0
785 107 106 0 54 0 54 0 2715
87 87 260 0 0 6 11 17 0
786 473 0 0 0' 0 0 0
787 557 0 161 0 11 172 0
88 88 130 0 0 0 8 8 0
788 498 0 0 0 0 0 0
789 103 0 0 0 0 0 0
89 89 170 0 0 0 8 8 0
90 90 370 0 0 11 55 66 0
790 447 32 0 63 0 63 0
791 349 157 0 0 0 0 0
91 91 962 40 86 96 65 182 1200
92 92 633 392 213 124 369 706 0
93 93 2 .0 1344 8 27 1379 0
94 94 461 622 1340 531 568 2439 1000
95 95 350 1066 695 227 457 1379 0
TOTALS: 10564 3171 4130 3293 2157 10203 4658 2715
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE A-7
WINTER SPRINGS
TRAFFIC ZONE CONVERSION
INDEX
Planning Data
Zone (Figure 4)
Assignment
Zone
71
776
72
778
82
83
780
781
782
84
783
85
86
785
87
786
787
88
788
--189
89
90
790
791
91
92
93
94
95
150
150
148
149
97
98
147
96
190
151
146
152
187
192
153
191
144
99
100
46
45'
143
6
14
3
4
5
1
2
Appendix-7
I
I
I
I
r
I
I
o
C\ 0
o
SEE FIGURE 4
WINTER SPRINGS ZONES
~
',l)
/,,/
/
.(
~
'.
lJ111ff- ...
0 48
LEGEND ((51 C)
:3
- STUDY AREA BQU.UARY.
---- MICRO-ZONE BOUNDARY
32 MICRO-ZONE M.Jf.C8ER 50
62
MICRO-ZONE SYSTEM
FIGURE A-1
Source: Casselberry Transportation Plan by Foxworth, Swift and Associates.
.Append i.x-8
,- - .- --- ~ - ... - - - ... .- .. ..
~
(f;)~ ~^j/
~ 1766 ~
lQ)~
5n
~~"), -N-
, ~
.,
..
2i3~f = =
00 "'ClI
~~~i i [ N.T,S.
~E~~ ~ X
..~..o
~ ii ~~ ~O
<i. 1087 " ~ ~.1.o] --@
. . ~
C'-l
(() l>t
~ 0 ~ a "C
>
z r.1 1071 1109 1409 1410
f? 'f z I
~ N vl
U\ ?
<!J '"
0 ...,
I 1435
~
~gJ 1453
1454
1456
!~~ II.>
~3: <it
~j~ 1175
~ ~ ~ 1516
1187 ~
~ ~ 1430
-<
Z~ 1450
l
(0)~
:J
lQ)~
dn
.,
r+
2i3p ~ ~
00 I'lQII
f~~~ e il.
OtJ :c
~N"'~CII0
~ . -
is
<i.
. .
----
10
g 0 ~ ~
>-
P.1 <(
z a.
a
I. 'f' z
~ fj vl
I --:'-.-=:"
~ '"
9 ~
I
~rH
~i
~~
~~
~~
~
0
-<
~~
~
-N-
~'
.- t - - - -
~
"'" ~nD
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
r
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
2010 FUTURE TRAFFIC
CIACUlA TION MAP
.-"\"
/
J(SW
-
11II
IBD
ED
EXlsnHO ROAD""'", YS
AAtr:Ru..L 1lQ.AD'CAY1
tcU...!Cl~ ROA.D........-n:
ST A IT AND COUNTY FliHOCD
-'-'-'- 'lAlr (\..t()(l)
~ji(o~n
. .............. COJNry ruNOCD
U"'RO\oofi.D~ n
!-!UNICIPAl IlJPACT fIT FUflDrn
OC'-'flc.:f>o. 1\JKtt.1)
IW'~O~n
I.fI"-CT ra
IL.#"MO\.(\C'I'
fUNCllONAL ClASSlflCA l1(\'j
P A Pt<NaP",- 'J<lO<",-
MA ""OIl .....100"'-
R A ~\.fW. AA T1J<W.
Me IIA.C>\ cnuc 101
CMC c<u<rr III"" couel'"
HOrr., ...u ttCtUCtHED R~ NOr l..lJ..l(110
~ "'UHCPAL CCl..UC1CRS"
HUMBER OF l..A.NES
( 4-) NlA.el~ C'I RC\.A..D*,.,y L..ovt( S
Hom RO.,I.,DWA'r1 N:)T L.A.8UIIl H....-..{ r..o ~(1.
- - .- - -- - - - - - - .- 11II dIm
({>>~ 1766 ~
:s
lQ)~
5n
,,~~I). -N-
., ~
..
2Flp ~ ~
s~ '"'CD!
!~!I e ~ 1351 --& N.T,S.
"-
L ~..o "-
~ . - (oC>.J o ~C}:
i3 ~ ti"
<i. 1087 1.10.2 - -@
. . ~
C'l
~ l><
8 0 ~ ,," C)
~ r-
Z r.l ~ 1071 1109 1409 1410
f? Ol :z: I
~ I vj
N
t;. ?
"' '"
~ -.J
~ 1435
~ N
g
~~I 1453
1454
1456
~~~ 1169 I-:..J< 11.>
g~~ 197 ~ 11.2,8 "- 'il
1175
~ z \ 1516
~ ~ - ~
1187 ~
~ ~ 1430
0
-<
:n
~@ 1450
+>-fR l
- - --
- -
.. IIl1/iI _
. I . .
778 Tuscawilla Unit 11 66 .
778 Chelsea Woods 321
778 Bear Creek Estates 67
778 Chestnut Estates Ph. 1 & 2 37 . 14
491 0 0 0 14 0 0 0
72 Eaoles Watch Ph, 1 & 2 57 53
72 Howell Creek Ph. 1 & 2 56 100
72 Tuscawllla Tract 15 Parcel 3 80
113 0 0 0 233 0 0 0
82 Tuscawilla Unit 11 B 28
82 Tuscawilla Unit 12 90
82 Arrowhead Unit 1 (Parcels 3 4 5) 0 11
82 Fairwav Oaks 72
82 Woodstream (Arrowhead Unit 5) 32 56
82 Greenbriar Phase 1 86
82 Greenbriar Phase 2 34 81
82 Chesea Parc Phase 2 36
82 Chelsea Parc Pha.')e 3(Fox Glen) 11 51
82 Chelsea Parc Phase 4 40
82 Bentley Green 44
82 Bentlev Club 41
82 Glen Eaole Units 1 2 & 3 257
82 Carrino ton Woods 76
82 Davenoort Glen 70
82 Chestnut Ridae 52
82 Tuscawilla Unit #13 39
82 Braewick 85
82 Tuscawilla Unit 7 79
1132 0 0 0 239 0 0 0
I
-
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
,
I
I
)
Table 15
CITY 2010 ROAD NEEDS
DEVELOPER AND OTHER FUNDING
(Inside City Limits)
Developer
1. Connect Shepard Road to Edgemon Avenue.
2. Improve Tuskawilla Road north ofS.R. 434 (formerly Brantley Avenue).
3. Improve Spring Avenue with drainage and paving improvements.
County
1. Improve TuscawiIla Road from two (2) lanes to four (4) lanes.
2. Improve Shepard Road to three (3) lanes from U.S. 17-92 to Sheoah Boulevard.
3. Improve East Lake Drive from two (2) lanes to four (4) lanes.
State
1. Improve U.S. 17-92 from Seminola Boulevard to S.R. 419 from four (4) lanes to eight (8)
lanes.
2. Improve S.R. 434 from U.S. 17-92 to Moss Road from five (5) lanes to seven (7) lanes.
3. Improve S.R. 434 from S.R. 419 to Eastern Beltway from four (4) lanes to six (6) lanes.
4. Improve S.R. 419 from S.R. 434 to U.S. 17-92 from two (2) lanes to four (4) lanes.
III-J6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
Table 16
CITY 2010 ROAD NEEDS
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS FUNDING
Phase I
The following improvements should be undertaken by the City at the earliest possible date:
1. Improve Panama Road from Moss Road to Edgemon Avenue.
2. Improve Hayes Road north of Bahama Road to existing paving on Hayes.
3. Improve Moss Road from Panama Road north to existing paving on Moss Road.
4. Replace Hayes Road bridge.
5. . Replace Moss Road bridge.
Phase II
1. Paving and drainage improvements to Bahama Road from Shore Road to Hayes Road.
2. Paving and drainage improvements to Panama Road from Shore Road to Moss Road.
3. Paving and drainage improvements to Fisher Road from Panama Road to City Limits.
4. Add stacking lanes to Hayes Road at the S.R. 434 intersection.
Phase In
1. Upgrade Moss Road from S.R. 434 to S.R. 419 from two lanes to four lanes.
Phase IV
1. Improve Winter Springs Boulevard to three lane capability from Northern Way to Northern
Way (east section). This will be accomplished by adding turn lanes at each intersection for
both traffic flow directions.
[Il-37
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I;
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table 16
(Continued)
New Traffic Signals
The following traffic signals on major intersections should be installed when warranted by using ITE
standards. Signals shall be constructed using County mast arm standards:
1. S.R. 434 & Tuscora Drive
2. S.R. 434 & Vista Willa Drive
3. S.R. 419 & Edgemon Avenue
4. S.R. 419 & Moss Road
The following traffic signals on minor intersections should be installed when warranted by using ITE
standards. Signals shall be constructed using Seminole County mast arm standards:
1. . Moss Road & Dolphin
2. Winter Springs Boulevard & Northern Way (westernmost)
3. Northern Way & Shetland Avenue
4. Northern Way & Tuscora Drive
5. Northern Way & Vista Willa Drive.
6. Trotwood Boulevard & Northern Way
7. Edgemon A venue & Shepard Road
8. Winter Springs Boulevard & Northern Way (easternmost)
[JI-38
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CHAPTER IV
CONCURRENCYPL~G
In 1985, the Florida Legislature adopted the "Growth Management Act," (Florida Statutes, Chp. 163)
to provide a framework for local governments to use as they develop or modify their long-range
Comprehensive Plans. One of the major provisions of this Act required local governments to insure
that the public facilities and services that are necessary to support development, be available
"concurrent" with the impacts of development. This means that all new development must be
located where existing services are available or where there are plans and funds to provide these
services. It is understood that the Winter Springs City Commission intends to pass a concurrency
management ordinance in compliance with this requirement.
OBJECTIVE OF THIS REVIEW
As of this date, the City of Winter Springs has not monitored traffic impacts from ney.r development
since adoption of the Comprehensive Plan; thus, approved (vested) development traffic mayor may
not be under the Level of Service (LOS) threshold established in the Comprehensive Plan. To
determine whether existing and committed (ftmded for construction within three years)
transportation facilities can accommodate existing and approved development, a comparison of
existing and committed traffic to adopt~d roadway capacities was accomplished. Since traffic
studies have not been required for new development, it was necessary to simulate this vested
(committed) traffic using traffic models calibrated for the City of Winter Springs (Chapter III).
These models reqllire socioeconomic data by traffic zone for the existing plus committed (E+C)
development. This data was developed by the Consultant from data provided by the City (see Table
17), and the application of the model resulted in an assignment of E+C traffic to the system of
arterial and collector roads in the Winter Springs Area.
AVAILABLE CAPACITY
Since the traffic model results are in Average Daily Traffic (AD'T), daily capacity was used for this
analysis. Peak hour traffic must be used in intersection analysis and for traffic impact studies (see
following section). Where capacity is not available using ADT values, the applicant must show that
. peak hour traffic generated by the development will not cause any roadway link or intersection to
exceed the LOS provided for in the Comprehensive Plan (LOS D). {
Table 18 shows the status of each link in the City of Winter Springs as of the end ofl996. Those
links showing a negative " Available Capacity" will require widening before additional development
traffic can be accommodated. In some instances, it may be possible to accommodate the
development using a peak hour analysis which must be performed by the applicant. ADT traffic
[V-l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
values shown in Table 18 may be converting to peak hour using factors developed by FDOT1 in their
derivation of LOS 0 Capacity.
The information in Table 18 (as updated) may be given to development applicants. It is understood
that as developments are approved, the table should be updated by adding traffic (ADT) obtained
from a Traffic Study Report. The table should be fully updated every two (2) years with new traffic
counts and E+C traffic either from the model or manually by deleting that portion of each project's
traffic that is builtout.
TRAFFIC IMP ACT REPORTS FOR CONCURRENCY AND fvfITIGA TION
It is the intent of the City Commission to responsibly monitor growth and development in order to
ensure that adequate public facilities are in-place to se:ve new development, and that such facilities
perform at adopted levels of service so defined in the City's Comprehensive Plan.
In order to assess and monitor the impact of new development and comply with concurrency
requirements, a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) is required for all new development, with the
exception of that provided by ordinance. The TlA will be used to determine the extent of site related
traffic improvements, mitigation for off-site improvements, and will be used as the basis for
concurrency determinations.
For proposed developments that will add 300 or more new Average Daily Traffic (ADT) to adjacent
roads, the TIA will provide a comprehensive assessment of the development's impact on the
surrounding road system. For proposed developments that will add less than 300 new ADT, the TlA
shall provide information regarding the development's impact on access points onto the adjacent
street system.
All developments with more than 300 ADT (''New Trips") shall be required to demonstrate that the
additional vehicle trips generated by such development would not cause any road segment or
interSection within the distances shown in Table 1 (primary impact area) to exceed the Levels of
Service (LOS) as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and under Objective 0 given 41 Chapter ill.
The primary impact area shall be determined by drawing a circle with a center point at the centerline
of each development's access point(s), using the appropriate radius as provided in Table 1 based on
. the estimated "New" ADT. Any arterial or collector intersection that is captured within the primary
. impact area must be evaluated and shall be the starting point for a road segment that must also be
evaluated; except that any intersection which cannot be reached by normal driving practices on a
paved access from the development's access point may be excluded from the evaluation.
I Florida's Level of Service Standards and Guidelines Manual for Plannin~, FOOT 1995
(or as updated), See Table E-1.
IV-2
-----..........----......-------..Itmm
TABLE 17
......
<
I
w
October 1996 City of Winter Springs Existing Plus Committed Socioeconomics Data
Seminole Subzone Existing Existing Existing Existing Existing Total School School
County Single Multi-Family Industrial Commercial Service Employment Enrollment Enrollment
Traffic Zone Family DU DU Employment Employment Employment K-8 9-'12
70 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
776 60 0 0 0 0 0 0
72 72 113 0 0 0 0 0 0
778 468 0 0 0 15 15 0
82 82 1371 0 0 9 30 39 0
83 83 545 0 0 104 0 104 0
780 127 0 10 0 10 20 0
781 1005 0 0 30 0 30 0
782 129 0 0 0 0 0 0
84 84 92 0 72 0 57 139 0
783 243 460 166 10 54 230 2458
85 85 0 0 0 28 0 26 0
86 86 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
785 25 0 0 54 0 54 0 2715
87 87 260 0 0 6 72 78 0
786 473 0 0 0 0 0 0
787 557 0 0 0 0 0 0
88 88 130 0 0 0 11 11 0
788 498 0 0 0 0 0 0
789 103 0 0 0 0 0 0
89 89 170 0 0 3 8 11 0
90 90 370 0 0 11 55 86 0
790 447 - 32 0 40 0 40 0
791 349 157 0 0 0 0 0
91 91 962 40 0 96 0 95 1280
92 92 633 392 6 124 369 499 0
93 93 2 0 412 8 27 447 0
94 94 461 622 1340 531 568 2439 815
95 95 350 1066 110 227 457 794 0
TOTALS: 9946 2769 2116 1281 1733 5157 4553 2715
~ .... - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - ~ ~
TABLE 18 (I of 3)
WINTER SPRINGS
E + C SYSTEM CAPACITY ANALYSIS
(A VERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC)
ROADWAY FROM TO NO. OF ROADWAY LOS D 1996 1996 E&C NEW AVAILABLE TRIPS
LANES CLASS DAILY COUNT COMMITIED TRAFFIC TRIPS CAPACITY THIS
(E &C) CAPACITY '(E) TRAFFIC SINCE PROJECT
(C) 1996
U.S. 17.92 S.R. ~3~ SHEPARD RD, 0 ARTERIAL 47,500 36,123 4,271 40,394 7,100
U.S. 17.92 SHEPARD RD. C.R. 419 4 ARTERIAL 31,100 36,123 4,010 40,133 -9,035
S.R. O~ U.S. 17.92 C.R.419 <I ARTERIAL 31,100 24,842 3,998 28,890 2,210
S.R. ~ 34 C.R.419 TUSKAWlLLA RD oi ARTERIAL 31,100 24,752 5,509 30,256 844
S.R.04 TUSKAWlLLA RD EASTERN BEL TwA Y 4 ARTERIAL 31,100 16,552 7,476 24,030 7,070
S.R.419 U.S. 17.92 EDGEMON AVE. 2 ARTERIAL 14,300 15,553 2,541 18,094 3,792
S.R.419 EDGEMON AVE. S.R. 434 2 ARTERIAL 14,300 12,271 1,274 13,545 755
E. LAKE DRIVE SEMINOLA BLVD FISHER ROAD 4 COLLECTOR 22.800 12,617 6,596 19,213 3,387
E. LAXE DRIVE FISHER ROAD TUSKAWlLLA RD. 4 COLLECTOR 22,600 9,472 6,826 , 16,298 6,302
TUSKAWllLA RD. REO BUG LK RD EAGLE BLVD. 4 ARTERIAL 31,000 25,398 11.400 36,793 .5,493
TUSKAWllLA RD. EAGLE BLVD. E. LAKE DRiVE 4 ARTERIAL 31,100 24,573 10,470 35,0-43 -4,043
TUSKAWllLA RD. E. LAKE ORNE WINTER SPGS. BLVD 4 ARTERIAL 31,100 16,572 5,164 21,756 9.2H
TUSKAWILLA RD. WINTER SPGS BLVD TROTWOOD BLVD 4 ARTERIAL 31,100 16,071 2,374 18,441 12,559
TUSKAWllLA RD. TROTWOOD BLVD. S.R. 434 4 ARTERIAL 31,100 12,056 2,269 14,327 18,673
SHEPARD RD. U.S. 17.92 SHEOAH BLVD. 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 3,081 80 3,141 7,059
SHEOAH BLVD. SHEPARD RD. S.R. 434 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 5,831 1,060 8,941 3,259
BAHAMA ROAD HAYES ROAD WINDING HOLLOW 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 Dirt N1A
BL
MOSS ROAD PANAMA ROAD DOLPHIN ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 Dirt N1A
MOSS ROAD DOLPHIN ROAD S.R.434 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 4,707 808 5,315 ~,BB5
IV.4
~ - - - - --- - - -- - -- - .... .... .... - -- SiZimlI ~
TABLE 18 (2 of 3)
WINTER SPRINGS
E + C SYSTEM CAPACITY ANALYSIS
(AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC)
ROADWA Y FROM TO NO. OF ROADWAY LOS D 1996 1996 E&C NEW AVAILABLE TRIPS
LANES CLASS DAILY COUNT COMMllTED TRAFFIC TRIPS CAPACI1l' THIS
(E & C) CAPACI1l' (E) TRAFFIC SINCE PROJECT
(C) 1996
1.\055 ROAD S.R. ~3.j C.R.419 4 COLLECTOR 22,600 2,431 1,589 4,020 18,580
IlORTHERN WAY TROTWOOD BLVD TUSCORA DR. 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 2,500 64 2,584 7,818
NORTHERN WAY TUSCORA DR, VISTAVILLA DR. 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 2,500 900 3,400 ' 6,800
IIORTHERN WAY TROTWOOD BLVD WINTER SPG BLVD-S 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 1,888 129 1,997 8,203
NORTHERN WAY WINTER SPG. BLVD SHETLAND AVENUE 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 2,736 1,572 4,304 5,896
NORTHERN WAY GREENBRIAR LN. WINTER SPRG BLVD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 1,991 530 2,521 7,679
TROTWOOD BLVD TUSKAW1LLA RD. NORTHERN WA V 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 4,121 906 5,027 5.173
,"INTER SPG BLVD TUSKAWILLA RD. NORTHERN WA V 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 7,384 2,448 9,832 368
,'/INTER SPG BLVD NORTHERN WAY GREENBRIAR LN. 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 8,099 1,228 7,324 2.876
WINTER SPG BLVD NORTHERN WAY NORTHERN WA V 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 7,284 430 7,714 2.486
WINTER SPG BLVD NORTHERN WAY S.R.426 4 COLLECTOR 22,600 12,280 301 12,561 10,039
PANAMA ROAD EDGEMON AVE. MOSS ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 DIRT NIA
PANN.'A ROAD MOSS ROAD SHORE ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 DIRT N/A
HAYES ROAD BAHAMA ROAD DOLPHIN ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 DIRT NIA
HAYES ROAD DOLPHIN ROAD S.R.434 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 3,381 460 364 6,359
DOLPHIN ROAD MOSS ROAD HAVES ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 241 35 276 9,924
FISHER ROAD EAST LAKE ORNE PANAMA ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 1,267 218 1,465 8.715
IV-S
llXDI
~
--
-
~
-
~
~
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
-
fIIJ
-
as
TABLE 18
WINTER SPRINGS
E + C SYSTEM CAPACITY ANALYSIS
(AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC)
(3 of 3)
HOADWAY FROM TO NO. OF ROADWAY LOS D 1996 1996 E&C NEW AVAILABLE TRIPS
LANES CLASS DAILY COUNT COMMITTED TRAFFIC TRIPS CAPACITY THIS
(E & C) CAPACITY (E) TRAFFIC SINCE PROJECT
(C) 1996
SHORE ROAD PANA1AA ROAD END 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 425 170 595 ' 9,605
E."GLE RIDGE RD. BAHAMA ROAD S.R. 434 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 NOT OPEN
TUSCORA DRIVE NORTHERN WAY S.R. 43-4 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 765 2,127 2,892 7,308
VISTAWILLA DR. NORTHERN WAY S.R. 434 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 1,410 174 1,564 8,616
GREENBRIAR LN. NORTHERN WAY WINTER SPRG BLVD. 2 COLLECTOR 10.200 1,141 20 1,161 9.039
DYSON DR. TUSCAWILLA RD. SHETLAND AVE. 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 3,262 261 3,543 6.657
SH"TLAND AVE. DYSON DRIVE NORTHERN WAY 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 4,474 125 4,599 5,601
EDGEMON AVE. E. LAKE DRIVE MOSS ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 2,174 49 2,823 7,377
EDGEMON AVE, SHEPARD ROAD S.R.419 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 2,460 365 2,845 7,355
IV.6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 19
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
PRIMARY IMP ACT AREA
FOR
TRAFFIC IMP ACT ANALYSIS (TIA)
(DEVELOPMENTS WITH 300 OR MORE ADT)
DAIL Y NEW TRIPS (ADT)2
GENERA TED
PRIMARY IMP ACT AREA
(RADIUS) .
300-1500
1501-5000
5001-10,000
10,001 +
~-mile
1 mile
2 miles
3 miles
2Total and "Passer-by" trips to be determined from the latest edition of Trip Generation,
Institute of Transportation Engineers or "M.icrotrans" software (Equations if available). ''New
Trips" include trips ends above those generated by existing use (parcel must be occupied within
last 5 years to qualify as existing) less "passer-by" trips.
[V-7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Definitions
The following terms are used to help specify the procedures necessary for the TlA:
Methodology Meeting - This is a meeting with the City of Winter Springs Staff to discuss the
methodology that will be used to prepare the TlA. This meeting is strongly recommended for
projects where the trip generation will be over 300 new daily (ADT). It is also suggested for projects
where new trip generation is under 300 ADT.
Intersection Analysis - Analysis of the Level of Service (LOS) of the intersection using the
"Operations Analysis" as defined by the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual (or latest edition).
Site-Related Road Improvements - These are road capital improvements and right-of-way
dedications for direct access improvements to the development in question. These include, but are
not limited to:
I
1. Site Driveways and Roads;
2. Median cuts made necessary by such driveways or roads;
3. Right and left turn deceleration or acceleration lanes, leading to or from those
driveways or roads;
4. Traffic control measures for those driveways or roads;
5. Access or frontage roads not considered in impact fee calculations; and
6. Roads or intersection improvements whose primary purpose at the time of
construction is to provide access to the development
I
f
J
Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis - This is an analysis of the project's site(s) to verify whether a traffic
signal will be required. It shall include, at a minimum, an investigation of Traffic Signal Warrants
No. 1-,2,9 and 11 from the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), latest edition.
This analysis may not be required if it can be shown that the traffic volumes are too.low.to warrant
such analysis. The need for such analyses should be determined in the Methodology Meeting.
I
I
I
,-
(
Turn Lane - This means the width of pavement required to protect the health, safety and welfare of
the public and reduce adverse traffic impacts from turning movements, generated by a development
onto and off of a street. Such turn lanes would include separate left-turn, right-turn deceh~ration
lanes, right-turn free-flow traffic lanes, and right-turn acceleration lanes.
Traffic Generating Development - Land development designed or intended. to permit a use of the
land which will contain more dwelling units or floor space than the exiSting use of the land, or to
otherwise change the use of the land in a manner that increases the generation of vehicular traffic.
Trip End - A one-way movement of vehicular travel from an origin (one trip end) to a destination
(the other trip end). For the purpose of this requirement, "trip" shall have the meaning which it has
rv-8
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
in commonly accepted traffic engineering practice.
Trip Generation - The attraction and/or production of trips caused by a given type of land
development, as documented in the current Institute of Transportation Engineers CITE) ":IriQ
Generation" publication, or as calculated using the computer software "Micro trans. It
Traffic Modeling - The application of a series of mathematical formulae, converted to computer
software, for the purpose of estimating trip generation, trip distribution and traffic assignment to a
system of transportation facilities. Such models, calibrated for Winter Springs, currently in use by
Seminole County, or by the Orlando Urban Area Transportation Study (OUATS), may be acceptable
if approved for use in the Methodology Meeting. Other such models will require documentation of
their appropriate application in the Winter Springs area.
Ptu:pose 'ofTIA
The TIA is to identify transportation related impacts on the roadway that are likely to be generated
by a specific proposed development because of type, size, density, trip generation or location. The
TIA will identify access improvements, near-site improvements, and on-site improvements. The
- improvements are defined as follows:
I
1. Access Improvements
Road improvements necessary to provide safe and adequate ingress and egress and
for efficient operations. Access improvements include but are not limited to the
following:
I
I
J
I
I
I
t
a. Right-of-way easements;
b. Left and right turn lanes;
c. Acceleration and deceleration lanes;
d. Traffic control devices, signage and markings; and
e. Drainage and utilities as they relate to transportation improvements.
2.
Near-Site Improve~ents
Off-site or near-site improvements may be required in addition to impact fees to
satisfy concurrency requirements within the primary impact area '
3.
On-Site Improvements
Road and parking improvements located within the boundaries of the specific parcel
proposed for development and road improvements which provide direct access (turn-
lane, tapers, signalization, etc.) and right-of-way dedication are deemed to be totally
the responsibility of the developer and exclusive of the transportation impact fee.
On-site circulation and parking issues will also be addressed including traffic
[V-9
B
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
controls, pavement markings and traffic safety.
Content ofTIA'
A TIA shall be prepared by a qualified Transportation Engineer pursuant to an acceptable
methodology of transportation planning and engineering procedures. It is understood that the report
and/or recommendations would be sealed by a professional engineer, registered in the State of
Florida The expense of preparing the TIA is to be borne solely by the OwnerlDeveloper. The TlA
shall be reviewed for accuracy and content by the City or its representative prior to acceptance. Cost
of such review shall be borne solely by the Owner/Developer.
The TlA shall include the following items and describe the methodology, practices and principles
utilized in determining the findings and recommendations:
Requirements ofTIA with less than 300 new daily trips. The following shall be provided in letter
form with Engineer's seal and appropriate backup tables: .
a Number of units (i.e. dwelling units, square feet, etc.);
b. Description of development and ITE category for trip generation;
c. Trip end rates, or equations (to be used if available) used to generate the traffic, and the
source of this information (use of the ITE Trip Generation Manual, latest edition is required
unless otherwise approved or required by the City);
d. Total trips generated for the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) and the A.M. and P.M. peak
hours. (The peak hour for adjacent street traffic is usually the most appropriate peak hour
to use);
e. An analysis check if turn lanes, traffic signals, or other site related improvements will be
required at the project access points and roads. Turn lane warrants prescribed at the end of
this chapter are required. Turn lane design and length of storage lanes shall be based on
calculated "queue" length and shall conform to FDOT Roadway and Traffic Design
Standards (latest edition).
f. Sight distance triangld shall be plotted and included on site plans being reviewed with this
TIA. Limitation and restrictions within the sight distance triangle sh311 be identified and
removed if contained on the property of the applicant.
JUse Index Nos. 545 and 546 of FOOT Roadway and Traffic Design Standards (latest
edition) or alternative approved by the City.
rv-IO
B
I
TIA Requirements for Developments with 300 or More New Daily Trips" In addition to the
information listed above for projects generating less than 300 new trips, the following shall be
provided:
I
I
1. Existing Conditions:
I
I
I
I
I
a. General Site Description - A detailed description of the proposed development
including site location, type of development, projected construction completion date,
and phasing. TIlls section shall also provide a description of the roadway network
for the area under study, right-of-way and pavement widths, signal locations and
slgnage.
b. Discussion of Standards and Analysis Techniques - A detailed discussion of the
proposed analysis methodology, including intersection analysis, roadway capacities
and service volumes.
c. Analysis of Existing Conclitions - For all roadways and intersections within the
subject area, the existing average daily traffic, and peak hour traffic volumes shall be
reported, and roadway link analysis and intersection analysis provided. The peak
hour of the generator (development) should be provided as it relates both to the A.M.
and P.M. peak hour of the adjacent street. This discussion should occur at the
methodology meeting and an agreed peak hour(s) determined for the TIA.
I
d.
Programmed Improvements - The analysis shall indicate any programmed
transportation improvements ftmded for the primary impact area. A programmed
improvement is one that has been funded and is contained in a. work program. The
analysis shall indicate what program improvements are assumed in the analysis.
Programmed improvements expected to be under contract more than three (3) years
following the Certificate of Occupancy of this development shall not be used to
determine concurrency.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Statement of Project Trip Generation Characteristics - This shall indicate the project's trip
generation characteristics in terms of daily and peak hour generation. Full documentation shall be
provided if the trip generation rate utilized is other than that shown in the most recent ITE Trip
Generation Manual.' Such documentation shall be provided at the methodology meeting and
subsequently approved by the City prior to use. Special trip generation studies may be appropriate;
however, specific procedures, number of studies and location sball be reviewed and concurred in by
the City.
Statement of Background Traffic - The analysis shall include background traffic on the adjacent
roadway network. This shall include current traffic counts as well as projection of this base line
traffic to the occupancy date and/or concurrency date. All such growth factors require
documentation and justification. They should be discussed and agreed on at the Methodology
IV-II
I
~
R
I
I
Meeting.
I
I
I
Statement of Trip Distribution and Assignment - The TLA shall provide projected trip distribution
with appropriate justification and documentation. The distribution of traffic approaching the
development shall either be based on demographic data, current turning movements in the area, or
"gravity model." The procedure to be included should be discussed and documented in the
Methodology Meeting. The project traffic shall be shown and superimposed over the background
volumes with totals indicated in map and/or table format. ADT and peak hour are required on all
links.
I
Traffic Impact Analyses - All analyses shall be on a peak hour basis. For intersection and driveway
analyses, turning movements will be required for a LOS analysis. Highway capacity manual
software (HCS or equivalent to be agreed at methodology meeting) would be used for intersection
and driveway access points. Link analysis shall be performed using software available from FDOT
and described in Florida's Level of Service Standards and Guidelines Manual for Planning.
Driveway access points as well as intersections within the primary impact area shall be evaluated for
the Levels of Service indicated in the traffic element of the Citis Comprehensive Plan. Critical
intersections to be analyzed shall be agreed to in the Methodology Meeting. At a minimum, all
signalized intersections in the primary impact .area shall be analyzed. In addition, a roadway link
analysis using the FDOT software shall be developed for all impacted (more than 30 new peak hour
trips) roadways shown in the City's Comprehensive Plan and located within the primary impact area
I
I
Tables and figures shall include but not be limited to the following:
TABLES
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1.
Proposed Land Use by Phase, Type and Size;
2.
Passerby and/or Diverted Traffic Percentages by Phase and Land Use;
3.
Daily Trip Generation by Phase, Land Use, and Size with New Trips and
Passerby/Diverted Trips Separated;
4.
Peak Hour Trip Generation in the Same Categories as Daily Trip Generation;
and .
5.
Trip Distribution - Percentages Approaching the Site by Direction.
FIGURES
1.
Vicinity Map Showing Site;
2.
Existing Traffic Counts by Link (ADT and Peak Hour);
I
rv-12
I
I
I
I
3.
Post-Development Peak Hour Traffic (Turning Movements) - Project and
Total Traffic Separated;
4.
Post-Development Daily Traffic; and
I
5.
Recommended Improvements (either listed and described, in table format, or
on a drawing).
I
Traffic count summary documents and other reference material should be included in a Report
Appendix.
I
Conclusions and Recommendations - The report shall contain recommended improvements and
mitigating measures made necessary by the proposed development, including but not limited to:
I
a.
b.
Road Widening;
Provision of turriing, acceleration and deceleration lanes;
Signalization;
Regulatory Signage; and
New Roadway Construction.
I
c.
d.
e.
I
I
While the payment of impact fees is presumed to ITIltIgate off-site impacts, programmed
improvements (three years) may not be sufficient to accommodate the traffic impact of the project,
thus violating concurrency requirements contained in the Comprehensive Plan. It will be encumbent
upon the applicant to identify such intersections and links of the roadway system where Level of
Service standards will be violated at project buildout, or where improvements are planned three years
from the occupancy date of the development. It is understood that. in those developments which are
not to be occupied within one year. growth of background traffic before Levels of Service are tested
is required.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
[V-I]
I
I
I
and are summarized in Table J. Municipal collectors were not counted by Seminole County;
thus, the consultant made hourly machine counts on all of the roadways currently paved in early
1996. These counts are summarized in Tables 4 and 5. These counts were used to help
determine roadway classifications and were also used as a base for model validation.
I
I
A vailable Model Inputs - The City of Winter Springs and the study area defined above are part of
the Orlando Urban Transportation Study and the Seminole County TMP. Each of these
transportation studies has developed a set of transportation planning models and a set of data that
is input to these models. These input data include descriptions of the roadway networks which
normally only include collectors and high classified roadways. Additionally, these studies used
socioeconomic data files which describe land use activities in discreet areas known as traffic
analysis zones (fAZ's).
I
I
I
These computer files and listings were gathered so that a complete understanding of the
transportation planning efforts in this area could be obtained. Additionally, these files were
transferred to the proper format for input to the model chosen for this study. .
I
Existing Transportation Plans - Both state and county transportation planning activities have
produced transportation plans within the Winter Springs Study Area. These plans have been
reviewed and a listing of the transportation improvements presently planned and programmed
(within 5 years) for the City of Winter Springs and the study area is provided in Table 6. These
improvements will be studied in the 2010 Transportation Plans and Existing Plus Committed
Plans in the development of recommendation and concurrency management procedures.
I
I
I
I:
I
(This space intentionally left blank)
I
I
I
I
I
III-II
i1
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table 3
1995
DAil.. Y SEMINOLE COUNTY COUNTS
~ERSPRlNGSTRANSPORTATIONSTUDY
Roadway Location 1995 ADT
U.S. 17-92 Dog Track Road to S.R. 434 52,114
S.R. 434 to S.R. 419 36,123
S.R. 434 S.R.419toU.S.17-92 24,892
S.R. 419 to Tuskawilla Road 24,757
Tuskawilla Road to Springs A venue 16,552
Springs A venue to Eastern Beltway 15,286
S.R. 419 S.R. 434 to Edgemon A venue 12,271
Edgemon Avenue to U.S. 17-92 15,553
Red Bug Lake Road Eagle Circle to Dodd Road 34,888
Dodd Road to Tuskawilla Road 35,790
Tuskawilla Road S.R. 434 to Trotwood Boulevard 12,058
Trotwood Blvd. to Winter Springs Blvd. 16,071
Winter Springs Blvd. to Dyson Drive 16,572
Dyson Drive to E. Lake Drive 22,867
E. Lake Drive to Eagle Boulevard 24,573
Eagle Boulevard to Red Bug .Lake Road 25,398
. Red Bug Lake Road to Dike Road 22,684
E. Lake Drive Seminola Boulevard to Fischer Road 12,617
Fischer Road to Tuskawilla Road 9,472
Red Bug Lake Road Tuskawilla Road to Brooks Cave 30,448
Brooks Cave to Citrus Road 26,829
,
Citrus Road to Slavia Road 25,390
Slavia Road to Eastern Beltway" 17,589
Eagle Boulevard Dodd Road to Tuskawilla Road 4,278
!IJ-12
Table 4
1996 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC COUNT RESULTS
,....
,....
,....
I
I RAW AVERAGE ADJUSTED
: TRAFFIC COUNT ANNUAL ANNUAL
ROADWAY FROM TO COUNTS DAT.E FDOT ADJ. TRAFFIC
TWO WAY 1996 FACTOR TWO WA Y
SHEPARD RD U,S, 17-92 SHEOAH BLVD 3081 1/24 1 3081
SHEOAH BLVD SHEPARD RD, S.R. 434 5881 1/25 1 5881
MOSS RD. S, R. 434 C.R. 419 2431 1/24 1 2431
MOSS RD. PANAMA S.R. 434 4707 1/24 1 4707
EDGEMON AVE. SEMI NOLA PANAMA 2774 1/25 1 2774
EDGEMON AVE. PANAMA S.R. 434 3783 1/25 1 3763
EDGEMON AVE. S.R, 434 C.R. 419 2480 2/6 1 2480
WADE ST. S.R. 434 C,R. 419 1034 1/25 1 1034
DOLPHIN RD. HAYES RO, SHORE RD. 241 1/25 1 241
HAYES RD. PANAMA S. R. 434 3381 1/29 1 3381
SHORE RD, PANAMA S.R. 434 475 1/29 1 475
TROTWOOD BLVD. TUSCAWILLA NORTHERN WAY 4121 1/29 1 4121
TROTWOOD BLVD WEST OF TUSKAWILLA 2046 1/29 1 2046
NORTHERN WAY WINTER SPRS. BLVD. TROTWOOD BLVD, 1868 1/29 1 1868
NORTHERN WAY TROTWOOD BLVD. VISTAWILLA 2501 1/30 1 2501
NORTHERN WAY WINTER SPRS, BLVD, SHETLAND 2'736 1/30 1 2736
NORTHERN WAY GREENBRIAR WINTER SPRS. BLVD 1991 1/30 1 1991
VISTAWILLA NORTHERN WAY SENECA 1410 1131 1 1410
WINTER SPRS. BLVD TUSCAtlILLA NORTHERN WAY 7384 1130 1 7384
WINTER SPRS. BLVD, NORTHERN WAY GREENBRIAR 6099 1/31 1 6099
WINTER SPRS, BLVD. NORTHERN WAY NORTHERN WAY 7484 1131 1 7484
WINTER SPRS. BLVD. NORTHERN WAY CITY LIMITS 12260 1131 1 12260
GREENBRIAR WINTER SPRS. BLVD. NORTHERN WAY 1141 1/31 1 1141
DYSON DR, TUSCAWILLA SHETLAND 3262 1/31 1 3262
SHETLAND CITRUS RD. DYSON DR. 4474 1131 1 4474
ALTON RD. HAYES SHORE 1380 2/1 1 1380
BIRD RD, LAKE DR, NORTH 1267 2/1 1 1267
TUSKAWILLA S.R, 434 NORTH 917 2/1 1 917
TUSCOR{\ NORTHERN WAY SR. 434 .. 765 2/1 1 765
SENECA WINTER SPRS BLVD, 1/2 WAY 1418 2/1 1 1418
SENECA 1/2 WAY VISTAWILLA 1054 2/1 1 1054
'-'
ATTACHMENT C
lWO PBIX
.ss From
. ' "...:. ...,......~.'':,.. ., . . .
.~ ,-.;;)- ".~-"'''''~--.' "" . ..... . ...... ~ . . ,~. '"
"'~~11~'~ ,';"\ NOTlCE'}(}F CHANGE TO '~:'..
'> ,":":g(t.:':i~iAps ANDTEXT:::'
. '-~;:;"'1'.:t{~7.~:"':"'.' . ", , ',::;:
:TRA.FFIC"CIRCuLATION ELEMENT OF:::~,
.. .-t.;. .,' ',... ~. .' . " -' _ " .. '.. .',
'. THECUV'ORWINTER SPRINGS COM;..:,:~~~
\ :,-' \;:;. "': .:;' . - .' :~:. ,': .: .
,,':.,.:~;"">:. ":."::'.' PREHENSIVE PLAN .
I. . " ',' .., '.' .... . ., ,&.
", :,;;NdtICE.Is :JiEREBY GIVEN THAT THE LOCAL
! : ':::;PLA:NNING "AGENCY OF THE CITY OF WINTER..,
'..:.;;; . :'," , ,..1 .'. '., \01'1'4'0'
:';'gPRINGS WILL HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING ON At:
. ", .' 1I....~..
. ',: .J;i;~~g,~ -SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMEND,~:~
::: '!:;:'MENXPROPOSAL TO COMPLETELY REPLACE THE,
, ;~~TEX:f:AND MAPS OF THE TRAFFIC CIRCULATION;:'
.. . ELEMENT IN VOLUME 1 OF 2 AND 2 OF 2 OF T ,(
CITY:';SCOMPREHENSIVE PLAN WITH THE PRdti',
:~',:' ..~;\.';i"'\;..' . .~~,.. . :t'"
':':POSED'TEXT AND MAPS. .' ~'-'
, .: ~ ':' ;'1;;(:.. ,," ..,.F
" SATURDAY, DaOBER 14, 2000 I . '.. ..,
. ' .~aIiI;:::':' ".
.., ,,_iiiiW.~.. ,-",_.. ,
. .' . WWWRUGKING,COM www RUGKINO.cOM~,~ . . " '. ". -. i\~' -'
_.___.._.........T____ ...\ ',' . _. ~ ..1 ','_" ...,.,.Ln.n'._C..-__,.....a..v.r":~_.....
'. :A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED LARG.."
. .. SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT B ,': '
", :' '".1 -"\
, ".THELOCALPl:;ANNING AGENCY WILL BE HEL .
'; ;,:<ON dtTOBER:?is, 2000 AT 7:00 P.M. A. FIRS-:';
. .;f.f1;...~ . , . " "Ii, .
. }(TRANSMITt~);-Pl!BLIC HEARING ON THE PR!
, POSEl;)",'LARGEi;'SCALE COMPREHENSIYE PLA '"
. :\1iAMENDMENT"WILL BE HELD BVtHE CITY'CO ..
;:;;;M,rSSION ON NQVEMBER 13, 2000 AT 6:30 P.M. ..
~::-"~, :.
,. .
,;THESE PUBLIC.::HEARINGS WILL TAKE PLAC~~.
'CITY,HALL, 1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434, WINTER'
SPRlNG~,. FLQRrj)A. 'INTERESTED PERSONS MA
::.ATIEND AND BE HEARD.
.'~.. .
. ~ .... ,.,
. . ADDITIo,NAL ~ORMATION PERTAINING TO TH
, : ABOY~MAYB'E OBTAINED FROM THE CIT .
- :.CLERk;S,OFFICEAT 1126 EAST STATE ROAD 43
, WINTER, SPRINGS, FLORIDA. FOR MORE INFO '-
"MATi.QN',~c:ALL .,(407) 327-1800 #227. PERSO
: '.WrTlt::PJ.s'ABrLiTIES NEEDING ASSISTANCE T'
: :.;PARTIG'fi>A1'E';rn "ANY OF THESE PROCEEDIN
:, ,',i\SHOULD>CONTACT THE EMPLOYEE RELATIO
l' U,.. I' .
',. '};DEPARTMENT,<(:OORDINATOR, ,48 HO~RS
: ::;i':;MvANCE'.;- 0P':THE MEETING AT (407) 327-18
.; ~ ~'#.,~~3~~i;;tW~;',~;~;Ai>UBLI.C HEAIgNG. IFYOV DECID,
'.';'TO':APREAIYtANY' RECOMMENDATIONIDECISIO '
. ~ ., ,\. '." ;'\.:".)., ':~ .,." . . -,;, . . . .'.
, " ;A;.'MADE~1BY":THE~,tLOCAL PLANNING AGENCY 0
::1 }}~riY:~pMw~SIONWITH RESPECT TO. ANY-~' .
;:, ';{~TEt~YQ~~SrDEREb 'AT THIS MEETING';:NOU WIL
; ; ~;~J;ffl,~9:J~~;~CO~6F,. t~E PROCE~DiNGS,.:.: ::
i! ft~9Ri~Jr!~~:'..P.ORPOSES;' YO~ M~Y..N~Ep'yT, .
, .' !;~ENS.t;!RE'THAT.AVERBATIM RECORD OFTHEPR:
~; ';.~CEEI>INGS IS MADE UPON WHICHTHEAPPE'AL I .
_ 4!', " .::-.
:h.'TO BE:BASED.. :'
:;.;:',>_ ..';:X~; .~
'" l;.:::~~~... :,:;'L(). ........ ., LUACES
~~
. '- ..... :.~,
h_O.__..,,,
,- -. /..~"',
----.....------IIIiI..EIII
t .
.'
783 Tuscawilla Unit 8 78
783 Tuscawilla Unit 9 & 9B 164
783 Casa Park Villas 316
783 Tuscanv Place 72 72
783 Indian Trails Middle School 1
783 Keeth Elementary 1
242 388 2 0 0 72 0 Q'
84 The Reserve at Tuscawllla 44 48
44 0 0 0 48 0 0 Q
83 Tusca Oaks Phase 1 & 2 98 40
83 WedQewood Tennis Villas 233
83 Georaetown Units 1 2 & 3 214
545 0 0 0 40 0 0 0
85 SI. Johns landlnQ 31
85 McDonalds 1
0 0 1 0 31 0 0 0
785 W.S. Municioal Build/no . 1
785 W.S. HiQh School 1
785 Bills Landscaping 1
785 Central Winds Park 1
0 0 4 0 0 0 0 Q
780 Arbor Glen 37 1
780 Tuscawllla Unit 6 89
780 SI. Steohens 1
780 Kinder Care 1
780 Seven-Eleven 1
780 Tuscawllla Realty 1
780 Tuscawilla Office Complex
126 0 4 0 1 0 0 0
------li'IBImD
, .
. . . . . . .' .
781 Tuscawilla Unit 1 111 .
781 Tuscawilla UnIt 2 65
781 Tuscawilla Unit 4 379
781 Wedaewood Units 1 2,& 3 128
781 Country Club Villaae 1.2 & 3 245
781 Arrowhead Unit 2 10 18
781 Arrowhead Unit 1 - (Partial) 1 7
781 Tuscawilla Country Club 1
781 Arrowhead Unit 3 20
781 Arrowhead Unit 4 20
939 0 1 0 65 0 0 0
782 Winter SprinQs Unit 3 129
129 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
788 Oak Forest Unit 1 114
788 Oak Forest Unit 2 2A & 2B 163
788 Oak Forest Unit 3 120
788 Oak Forest Unit 4 75
788 Tuscawilla Unit 5 10
788 Grand Reserve :4 12
~186 0 0 0 12 0 0 0
786 Oak Foresl Unit 5 (lots 468 to 561) 94
786 Oak Forest Unit 6 (1015 562 to 715) 154
786 Oak Forest Unit 7(716 to 808) 93
786 Oak Forest Unit 8 (lots 809 to 940) 132
473 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
87 Winler SprinQs Post Office 1
87 Seminole Pines 102 100
87 WindinQ Hollow (east of Easement) 63
102. 0 1 0 163 0 0 0
-------l1'!I.iUmB
;. . .
,
787 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 9 109
787 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 10 112
787 WindinQ Hollow 149 187
370. 0 0 0 187 0 0 0
90 North Orlando Ranches See, 2 52
90 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 2A 196
90 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 5 22 3
90 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 8 72
90 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 1 (Part) 14 3
90 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 4 (Part) 3 5
359 0 0 0 11 0 0 0
88 Seville Chase 0 110
Dunmar Estates 20
20 0 0 0 110 0 0 0
791 Mosswood Aoartments 147
791 Moss Glen Townhomes 10
791 The Vineyards , 171
791 The Seasons 26 115
791 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 4 (Part) 5 2
791 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 1 (Part) 25 5
227 157 0 0 122 0 0 0
790 Hacienda VillaQe 441 6
790 Plnewood Terrace 32
790 State Farm Insurance 1
790 Cumberland Farms 2
441 32 3 0 6 0 0 0
-----
-
- -
- - -..
, ' Cl
92 Hiahlands Section 6 56
92 North Orlando 141
92 North Orlando 1st Addition 138
92 North Orlando 4th Addition 242.
92 North Orlando 5th Addition (partial) 34
92 North Orlando 8th Additlon 22
92 Lori Ann Acres 64
92 Doua's Unit 10 56
92 Moss Road Quads 20
92 Indian RidQe 84
92 Deer Sona 152
92 Fairfax Apartments 16
92 La Petite Nurserv 1
92 Mr. Bubbles Car Wash 1
92 Dr. Pete Corum
92 Banfield Funeral Home 1
92 Excelsior Park 1
92 Winter Sorinas Center 33
92 Barnett Bank 1
92 Villaoe Market Place
92 Automotive One 1
92 Circle K 1
92 Public Works Comolex 1
92 Fire Station 1
92 Public Safety Comolex 1
633 392 42 0 0 0 0 0
-
e
--------....----------
. . .
. .
. . .
93 Winter Sorinqs IndustrIal Park .
93 Broadwav Gvmnastics
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
94 Hiqhlands Section 1 102'
94 Hiqhlands Section 2 41
94 Hiahlands Section 4 75
94 Hiahlands Section 7 & 8 56 , 2
94 Hiahlands (Blades Court) 8
94 Hlahlands East Quadraolxes 16
94 Highlands Patio Homes 25
94 Cvoress Club 75
94 Cvoress Villaoe 22
94 Sheoah Section 2 144
94 Sheoah Section 3 28
94 Hiahland Villaae One 62
94 Hiahland VilIaae Two 74
94 Hiahland Lakes 31 10
94 Hiahlands Elementarv School 1
94 Bavtree 182
449 492 1 0 12 0 0 0
95 Sheoah Site A 46
95 Golf Terrace Aoartments 380 250
95 Wildwood 120 170
95 Seville on the Green 200 20
95 Greensoolnt 107 9
95 Hiqhlands Section 5 41
95 Winter Sorinqs Golf Course
95 Hiqhlands Glen 15 14
95 Sheoah Sec. 1 44
327 796 0 0 23 270 0 0
89 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 1 12 . 6
89 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 1 A & 1 B 55 3
89 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 6 37 2
89 North Orlando Ranches See 7 43 3
147 14
.,,:'. ,.....\1..
. ~ ."
".1
.:.' 'J'::'::::::: '
':,' ".,'
, .' "'"
ATTACHMENT D
~
I
)
I
I
j
J
]
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SUPPLEMENT NO.1
To
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
TRANSPORTATION STUDY
December 1999
CPH Engineers, Inc.
1117 E. Robinson Street
Orlando, Florida 32801
(407) 425-0452
CPl-I Project No. W0459.03
The Transportation Study was completed in 1997 and identified no deficiencies in the tranSpoI1ation
in fca 51 wctu cc 0 f th e C; t Y 0 f W; n tcc S pci n gs' local system fo ,. the peo ject eel 201 0 tca fro c loadings.
Roadways identified for improvements included U.S. 17-92, S.R. 434, Seminola Boulevard, Lake
Drive, and Tuskawilla Road which are wlder the control of the County and FDOT. U.S. 17-92 is
undec ronal constwction of a six-lane improvement project from Shepard Road (Winter Springs)
south to Melody Lane (Casselberry). State Road 434 has been improved to four Janes form S.R. 419
to the Greeneway. Seminola Boulevard has been improved to four lanes, Tuskawilla Road has been
improved to four lanes divided and Lake Drive is currently under design for four lanes, divided. This
supplement updates the 1997 study to acknowledge these improvements and the ones also
constructed by the City. No changes were made to the land use, existing uses, or projected
development.
It has become evident that a collector road system is required for the undeveloped area east of the
City Hall. This area has been designated as the Town Center and is scheduled for growth within the
planning period. A roadway collector system has been identified to serve this area. Since these
roads are for new growth, the ftmding is projected to come from the transportation impact fee. This
collector system is shown on the attached revised drawings.
;;.~,
Only updated materials are attached to this supplement. Since the growth projections have not been
revised, the overall traffic study remains valid.
,
!
1
1
]
I
]
I
]
I
I
I .
)
I
I
I
I
I
REVISEDIUPDATED TABLES and FIGURES
OOJECTIVE
G) Conserve the natural environment and augment open space in the City as fUllctions of
road development.
Policies
1)
Where valid options are available, choose rights-of-way for the City collector
system distant enough from natural drainage features and upland habitats to
coexist with these natural areas.
2)
The incursion of a roadway through these natural areas shall be allowed if it
benefits the public need, such as for access by emergency vehicles or transporting
school children, outweighing other concerns.
3)
Include in all new road plans adequate right-of-way for potential landscaping and
provide for maintenance, in the annual budget of the City.
4)
Designate scenic to preserve as much as possible of existing vegetation 'and
canopy.
OBJECTIVE*
~
H) Ensure that current and future rights-of-way are protected from encroachment from
structures or ancillary uses inconsistent with the designation of rights-of-way. Rights-of-
way necessary for the maintenance of level.of service standards and for the safe design of
roadways in accordance with State standards shall be required.
Policies
1) The City, in its land development regulations shall require the dedication of all
needed rights-of-way and necessary roadway improvements for all new
development, and adopt provisions to protect existing rights-of-way by limiting
the use and/or encroachment by structures and ancillary uses.
2) The City shall acquire right-of-way for future transportation needs as funds
become available.
*Item H - Revised 12/99
1lI-6
)
]
1
J
J
1
]
]
.1
]
]
J
J
j
1)
2)
3)
4)
';r..v.J 5)
X{l 6)
7)
8)
9)
10)
11 )
12)
13)
14)
15)
16)
17)
18)
19)
T:d)lc 2
(Hcviscd 12/99)
1999
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION
WINTER SPJUNGS TRANSPOH.TATlON STUDY
Freeways
Principill Arleriills (State)
I)
Eastern Beltway (Stale)
I)
2)
SR 434
SR 419
Principal Arterials (County)
Maior Collectors (County)
1)
2)
Red Bug Lake Road
Tuskawilla Road
1)
2)
East Lake Drive
Red Bug Lake Road - Tuskawilla
Road to Eastern Beltway
Minor Collectors (County)
I)
2)
3)
4)
5)
Municipal Collectors (City)
Dodd Road
Eagle Boulevard
Shepard Road - U.S. 17-92 to Winter Springs City Limit
Tuskawilla Road (North ofSR 434)
Bahama Road - Shore Road to Hayes Road
Dolphin Road - Moss Road to Hayes Road
Dyson Road - Tuskawilla Road to Shetland Avenue
n Avenue - Panama Road to SR 419
Fischer oad - Panama Road to E. Lake Drive
r en riar Lane - Northern Way to Winter Springs Boulevard
Hayes Road - SR 434 to Bahama Road
Moss Road - SR 419 to Panama Road
Northern Way - All
Panama Road - Shore Road to Edgemon Avenue
Shepard Road - Seminole County Line to End
Sheoah Boulevard - Shepard Road to SR 434
Shore Road - Panama Road to End
Winding Hollow Boulevard - SR 434 to End
Winter Springs Boulevard - Tuskawilla Road to Eastern Beltway
Trotwood Boulevard - Tuskawilla Road to Northern Way
Tuscora Drive - SR 434 to Northern Way
Vista-Willa Drive - SR 434 to Northern Way
Town Center Collector SR 434 to Tuscawilla (East and West)
IlI-9
~
I
J
]
]
]
J
.1
]
]
.)
]
]
J.
J
]
U <Ui VJ illu:d
L> 0C3
2 Undiv.
4 Div.
6 Div.
"1"/\1\1.1-". n
CENERAL! LEO M';NUAL AVERAGE DAI L y VOLUM}:5 Fan. FLOH..1 DA.S
URBANIZED AREAS.
ST ^ TE T\V o. W ^ Y ARTEJUALS
UNINTERRUPTED fLOw
A
8.900
21,500
32,200
Levd or $<rvia:
C
18,900
~,Ioo
75.200
D
24,800
60,100
90,200
E
33.100
71,600
107.400
FREEWA YS
Gro<Jpl
(wilhin urb.niud He> ovu 5OO.CXXJ aoo 1<..Ad;og 10 0< pUJing
wilbin 5 mile.> or Ihe prim>.1)' cily ccntal b\UiDCLI dutrict)
Lcvc lor S<: rv;a
C
.5 2. 900
7<),400
1Q.5.9OO
IJ2.400
151,700
B
IJ,9OO
35,800
53,700
1.NTERRUPTED n..ow
1..1De3
2 Undiv.
4 Div.
6 Div.
8 Div.
OJI.U Ib (2..50 10 ".so sign.aJiud iOlenec.lions per mile)
- . uvcl oC Service
AU B" C
8,800
19,200
29,300
35,800
E
15.900
J..4,lXXl
51,400
62.900
O.us U (IDore Ih.Lo ".;$() si & oJ.! i.u.d i 0 l.cncc1io<u per mil e and DO(
within primU)' cily ceolnl IXJ3iDCU dUtrict oC urtll.oin:d
area over 5oo.lXXl)
l..a.ou
4
6
8
10
12
A
21, lXXl
33.100
44,100
55.2C9
63.200
D
35,200
52. 9C()
70,500
88.200
101.100
D
67.OCXJ
100,600
1J..4.100
167,700
192..200
E
8O.BCO
126.900
169 .200
211,400
242,)00
Gro<Jp 2 (wilhu. urbanized aru.nd nOl in Group I)
OUA h (>0.00 10 2.-49 sign.aJi:z:ed lnl.cDCdions per mile) uvcl of Se rvice
Level oC Sc.svic:c l..u>c3 A B C D E
1..1 nes A.. B C E... 4 20.300 32,500 .c<I,800 61,800 7"..soo
2 UDdiv. 12, 600 15.200 17,000 c 6 30,600 48,900 7.3,400 93,000 . 117.300
"Div. 27,900 33,.300 35,800 L 8 "".800 6.5,200 97,900 124,000 156.300
6 Div. -43.200 ~,.wo 53.700 ^ 10 51,lXXl 81,500 1 Z2,..JOO J55,OCXJ 195,400
8 Div. 53,800 62,000 6.5 ,800 6S,800 s 12 58, 400 9~ ,.200 I 4O.CXXJ 1 T1 ,.300 22J,600
s
unc..s
2 Undiv.
4 Div,
6 Div.
8 Div.
AU
Level of Scrvia:
C"
D
1\ ,800
26,500
40.700
49.700
E
15.200
33.400
50.600
61,800
Ous 111 (more than 4.50 siglUli2.ai inl.cn<:aioru per mile Ind willlin
primuy cily centnl blUincu dutrict oC urbUliud
:uu over 500,000)
1..1nu
2 Undiv.
4 Div.
6 Div.
8 Div.
BOO
A.'
U Y'C I oC Service
COO
D
13,200
29,500
4-( .800
5-4,700
E
14,800
32.600
49.300
60,100
NON-STATEROADWAYS
~WOR CTY/GOUNTY ROADWAYS
Leve 1 ol S<:rvicc
L>oc.s A" BOO C ~ E
2Undiv 10.900 J 5,500
"Div. 24.400 33,200
6 Div. 37,800 47,500 50,200
OTIlERSIGNALlZED ROADWAYS
c (si zn.>.liud inl.c ncction UI J.! Y1U)
L Level of Service
^ unC3 A" Boo C E
s 2 Undiv 5,.200 11,700
s 4 Div. 11.400 :!5100
II
C
L
^
Lu=
2
2
Multi
Multi
ADJUSTMD-TS
DIYlDEDlUNDrvIDED
(a.her colTe1pOndin,g lWO-WIY volume indioted pc:rccnl)
MtdLM uft Turn B.ays Adjunment FKton
Divi6al Yc..s +5%
UDdi> i6al No -20%
UndMdcd Yo .5%
UDdi>idal No -25%
BOO
S
III
ONE-WAY
(Iller corraponwng Iwo-way volume indicated percent)
One.Way Con=ponding Adjuw=nl
unu Two-Way Lana F.=
2 4 --<<>%
3 6 -<<>%
4 8 -<<>%
5 8 -2.5%
n... -. w-..,; ~ . ~ -d -..oJ b< -' """ '" ....,.., ~~..... Tho "'"'P"'" ~ -.. ~.,.,;"....,..;. 6<rt-l....,.... be ~::;"'opocif>< ~~~~
ThcUblc......t~~II""Oddo~--=-t..--fb~~~io..~~~,.J;.n.d~CJI... v-"--~--_.-J-----r:" " (AAOT) .
('--d - K-l.ocn. "'" pc->. ... ~ ... u., '" "-" 0{ --..:.0.. -' ~ '--l_ ... 19'1-4 II......., ~.., 1-4........ Uf"1-o ...d flonO. u.mc.. """"ry """ ..........._ ""- no. """" . ____
&M 1--' or ~ anan. '9P"'=W D'lo u....- ~
c-""OI b.. ..o~
Vo.l-W"C~r-~c~ ~""~.i-...., ~
flo.-id. OcJ-lVlo~ 01 T,.~ 191'1.
50...~;
~OVT
().L.Cjm
Ill-Ie
~~ ~ ~~~~Y"'...:n.~"...cuJ'.-.~'~u.uo-...~
~~W/.ill'j,\.'}~ LOll
---- -----'
\VO~ 59CIOI.TAI1/IIllZ DccclI\bcr 19')')
TABLE (1 of 3)
YEAR 2010 ROADWAY LINK LEVELS OF SERVICE
WITH 2010 NETWORK
ROADWA Y FROM TO NO. OF ROADWAY LOS D MODEL VIC RATIO MODEL
LANES CLASS DAlLY DAILY DAILY
CAPACITY VOLlJ}.{E LOS E
U.S. 17.92 S.R. 434 SHEPARD RD, 6 ARTERIAL 47,500 52,200 1.10 F
U.S. 17.92 SHEPARD RD. C.R,419 6 ARTERIAL 47,500 55,200 1.16 F
S.R.4)4 U.S. 17.92 MOSS RO, 6 ARTERIAL 47,500 41,800 0.88 D
S.R.4)4 MOSS RD. C.R.419 4 ARTERIAL 31,100 26,900 0.89 D
S.R.4)4 C.R.419 TUSKA WILLA RD ARTERIAL 35,700 39,000 1.09
S.fl. 4)4 TUSKAWILLA RD EASTERN BELTWAY ARTERIAL 35,700 41,800 1.19 I'
S.R.419 U.S. 17.92 EDGEMON AVE. 2 ARTERIAL 14,300 19,900 1.39 F
S.R.419 EDGEMON AVE. S.R. 434 2 ARTERIAL 14,300 16,600 1.16 F
E. LAKE DRIVE SEMINOLA BL VD FISHER ROAD COLLECTOR 22,600 21,500 0.95 D
E. LAKE DRIVE FISHER. ROAD TUSKA WILLA RD. COLLECTOR 22.600 22,600 1.00 D
TUSKAWILLA RD. RED BUG LK RD EAGLE BLVD. 6 ARTERIAL 47,500 39,500 0.83 D
TUSKAWILLA RD. EAGLE BLVD. E, LAKE DRIVE ARTERIAL 35,700 35,500 0.99 0
TUSKAWILLA RD. E. LAKE DRIVE WINTER SPGS. BLVD 4 ARTERIAL 35,700 25,200 0.71 0
TUSKAWILLA RD. WINTER SPGS BLVD TROTWOOD BLVD 4 ARTERIAL 35,700 20,700 0.60 C
TUSKAWILLA RD. TROTWOOD BLVD. S.R. 434 4 ARTERIAL 35,700 20,200 0.57 C
SHEPARD RD. U.S. 17.92 SHEOAH BLVD, 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 11,200 1.10 E
SHEPARD RD. SHEOAH BLVD. EDGEMON AVE. COLLECTOR 10,200 7,900 0.78 0
SHEOMIOLvD. SHEPARD RD. S,R.434 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 8,400 0.82 D
OAHAMA ROAD HA YES ROAD WINDING HOLLOW BL COLLECTOR 10,200 100 0.01 C
MOSS ROAD PANAMA ROAD DOLPHIN ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 6,800 0.67 D
MOSS ROAD DOLPHIN ROAD S.R. 434 COI.LECTOR 10.200 7,300 0.72 D
l-....I ~ '""-- L.-...wI w.--J -- w.-.., lw..-i ..........., l..-....I U:..-J ----.. i,.......J ~ -.J
Dcccmbcr I YYY
TABLE (2 of 3)
YEAR 2010 ROADWA Y LINK LEVELS OF SERVICE
WITH 2010 NETWORK
ROADWA Y FROM TO NO. OF ROADWAY LOS D MODEL VIC MODEL
LANES CLASS DAILY DAD..Y RATIO DAILY
CAPACITY VOLUME LOS E
MOSS ROAD S.R. 434 C.R.419 4 COLLECTOR 22,600 14,100 .62 D
NORTHERN WAY TROTWOOD BLVD TUSCORA DR, 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 6,100 0.60 D
NORTHERN WAY TUSCORA DR. VISTA VILLA DR. 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 3,200 0.3 I C
NORTHERN WA Y VISTA VILLA DR. WYNTER SPG BLVD-E 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 3,600 0.35 C
NORTHt:RN WA Y TROTWOOD BLVD WINTER spa BLVD.S 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 2,500 0.25 C
NORTHERN WA Y WYNTER SPG BLVD SHETLAND AVE. 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 3,600 0.35 C
NORTHERN WAY SHETLAND AVE, GREENBRIAR LN. 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 3,900 0.30 C
NORTHERN WA Y aREENBRlAR LN. WINTERSPRa BLVD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 2,200 0.22 C
TROTwOOD BLVD TUSKA WILLA RD. NORTHERN WA Y 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 4,500 0.44 C
WfNTER spa BLVD TUSKA WILLA RD. NORTHERN WA Y 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 8,500 0.83 D
WINTER SPG BLVD NORTHERN WA Y GREENBRIAR LN. 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 5,600 OJS D
WINTER spa BLVD GREENBRIAR LN. NORTHERN WAY 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 5,000 0.49 C
WINTER spa BLVD NORTHERN WAY NORTHERN WA Y 2 COLLECTOR 12,000 11,100 0.93 D
WINTER SPG BLVD NORTHERN WAY S.R. 426 4 COLLECTOR 22,600 11,900 0.53 D
PANAMA ROAD EDGEMON AVE. MOSS ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 9,100 0.89 D
PANAMA ROAD MOSS ROAD SHORE ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 1,300 0.13 C
HA YES ROAD BAHAMA ROAD DOLPHIN ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 2,000 0.28 C
HA Yt:S ROAD DOLPHIN ROAD S,R,434 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 6,600 0.65 D
DOLPHIN ROAD MOSS ROAD HA YES ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 2,700 0.26 C
f'ISHER ROAD EAST LAKE DRIVE PANAMA ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 1,400 0.14 C
L-
'"'---'
----
~
'&..-...I
--- . \.--
l...-..J
'---'
\.-
~
i...---I
I..--.J
Dcccmbcr 1999
(3 of 3)
TABLE
YEAR 2010 ROADWA Y LINK LEVELS OF SERVlCE
WITH 2010 NETWORK
ROADWAY FROM TO NO,OF ROADWA Y LOS D MODEL VIC MODEL
LANES CLASS DAlLY DAILY RATIO DAlLY
CAPACITY VOLUME LOSS
TUSCORA DRJVE NORTHERN WAY S.R, 434 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 2,700 0.27 C
VISTA WILLA DR. NORTHERN WAY S,R. 434 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 4,000 0.39 C
GREENBRIAR LN. NORTHERN WAY WINTER SPRG BLVD. 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 1,500 0.15 C
DYSON DRIVE 11JSKA WILLA RD. SHETLAND A VENUE 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 2,600 0,26 C
SHETLAND AVE. RED BUG LAKE RD. DYSON DRIVE 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 3,500 0.34 C
SHETLAND AVE. DYSON DRIVE NORTHERN WAY 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 5,000 0.49 C
EDGEMON AVE. SEMlNOLA BLVD. PANAMA ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 9,100 0.89 D
EDGEMON AVE. SHEPARD ROAD S.R,419 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 4,300 0.42 C
EDGEMON AVE. S.R.434 SHEP ARD ROAD, 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 5,600 0.39 D
W04 59002.T AB/IlmzJd4
-'-
~~ G>
::J
,.,
::l s;
lQ)~ Ul
f'1
0
;::;
5n I
...,
I
'"
'"
...
r+
~'~Q=m~
,..:r-;::O ~
~ . ....
oci\~ C'l Cl
;:92 i ~
;o:::;'~ m 0-
!.~~B m
~~~;7.:C~
~3~ 0
,,~ -
9~ i 3
(')(")
tn
L. 0 V1
0 > (')
c ..., >
~ n ,...
f:'
P ...,
I Z
~ ':: ...,
V-
a I
.- '"
,--
'" ...,
6
~
~~
:06
CfJz
um
~m
zo
80
-1-
:oS:
>-u
z:o
CfJO
Un:;
Os:
::jm
>~
6CfJ
z-u
CfJ~
2z
0
-<
11
Cl~
:0
m
LEGEND:
IImm.. EIGHT LANES t
~ SIX LANES I
FOUR LANES -N-
~~~~~"" THREE LANES I
"""",. ~
TWO LANES
----- PAVING/DRAINAGE
0 1'-,'. I. S.
EXTENSION
. TRAFFIC SIGNAL/
INTERSECTlON GEOMETRY
.& WESTERN TOWN
CENTER COLLECTOR
S,R. 434
EASTERN TOWN
CENTER COLLECTOR &
'-'
z
1iw
0...>
V)<l:
g.
.
1/
~~
>-
<(
;:
I-
....J
w,.....
en...!
...!
z2
e::: '-'
w
l-
V)
<l:
W
LAKE DR,
I-
RED BUG LAKE RD,
Tablc15
2010 ROAD NEEDS
DEVELOPER AND OTHER FUNDING
(Inside City Limits)
(Revised 12/99)
Developer
1. Connect Shepard Road to Edgemon Avenue. (Completed)
. 2. Improve Tuskawilla Road north of SR 434 (formerly Brantley Avenue).
(Switch to Impact Fee Funding)
3. Improve Spring Avenue with drainage and p~ving improvements.
County
1. Improve Tuskawilla Road from two (2) lanes to four (4) lanes. (Under construction)
2. Improve Shepard Road to three (3) lanes from U.S. 17-92 to Sheoah Boulevard. (County
portion)
3. Improve East Lake Drive from two (2) lanes to four (4) lanes. (Under design)
State
1. Improve U.S. 17-92 from Seminola Boulevard to SR 419 from four (4) lanes to eight (8)
lanes. (Construction for six [6] lanes completed.)
2. Improve SR 434 from U.S. 17-92 to Moss Road from five (5) lanes to seven (7) lanes.
3. Improve SR 434 from SR 419 to Eastern Beltway from four (4) lanes to six (6) lanes.
4. Improve SR 419 from SR 434 to U.S. 17-92 from two (2) lanes to four (4) Janes.
T:d>lc J G
2010 I~O;\D NEEDS
CITY OF WINTE:I~ SPRINGS FUNDJNG
(Hcviscd 12/99)
Ph:lsc}
The following improvements should be undertaken by the City at the earliest possible date:
1. Improve Panama Road from Moss Road to Edgemon Avenue. (Completed)
2. Improve Hayes Road north of Bahama Road to existing paving on Hayes. (Completed)
3. Improve Moss Road from Panama Road north to existing paving on Moss Road.
(Completed)
4. Replace Hayes Road bridge. (Completed)
5. Replace Moss Road bridge. (Completed)
Phase II
1. Paving and drainage improvements to Bahama Road from Shore Road to Hayes Road.
2. Paving and drainage improvements to Panama Road from Shore Road to Moss Road.
(Completed)
3. Paving and drainage improvements to Fisher Road from Panama Road to City Limits.
4. Add stacking lanes to Hayes Road at the SR 434 intersection. (Completed)
Phase III
1. Upgrade Moss Road from SR 434 to SR 419 from two lanes to four lanes.
2. Improve Tuskawilla Road north of SR 434 (formerly Brantley Avenue). (Switch project
from developer funded to impact fee.)
3. Construct Town Center collector road to accommodate new development. Roads will
connect SR 434 and Tuskawilla Road for collection traffic from this area.
Phase IV
1. Improve Winter Springs Boulevard to three lane capability from Northern Way to
Northern Way (east section). This will be accomplished by adding turn lanes at each
intersection for both traffic flow directions.
(O)~
~
lQ);'
5n
""t
....
~~;.~g~
;"" '"' " t:l
~;'~l ~ ~
~s:g9.::J ~
5.~ ~':; c..., 0
"":::.. -
3~ - 3
- - :z
()(")
to
[;>
:::J
,.,
s
'"
'"
o
N
,
"
I
'"
<.:)
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
2010 FUTURE TRAFFIC
CIRCULATION MAP
.._---ro.\,
,.,....
./
J($IJP
~ '"
8 > n <1:
>
("'\ r a..
2 ,.,
Z
.: I -<
C " V1
." .n
., I ....
(..'1 '"
cO -..!
~
::E
~
:0
(J) -i
um
:DC/)
Z-i
0,
C/)
...,Q
]]:;2
~<
z>
r..n-<
uz
Om
~:;:i
"-1<
>0
:::J:o
07'
z
~
c
o
-<
11
~O
Ie
W:o
m
(4)"'....
~
-N-
~
..,,, . ,... ..., "'" ..,.
.~ ""'" . ""
.,.."""". "(4)"'" "[
......
",
'\
EXISTING ROADWAYS
"'llr(~~~'. .c.;........,
CQ..l.C::~ ~:~>n~
STATE AND COUNT'!' ,UI,G,e
S T... ~c r ..;,,:::~:
lv:o~o..'tvC...li
~~~~:[~.:\!:
UUNICIPAL IUPACT ,EE ,UN.:E;)
OC"~'.C;>( II: "_'", :~:
1\1/1' ~C"C:1J~."" ~ S
1\J"..:f ;r!
hl':>~CV:vr"":"
FUNCTIONAL CL^SS!;-!CA n:).,,---
P A l>~:...c.:)J.:' ....a~:tlJ..~
MA \.'lo.::,q U:"(~.I.'.
RA 1Il".'~.I,'" ...:n\::;jo,."
Me 1,/.1..>::': co..~c~c~
CMC C"-""" "''''' :~!::O'
1.;01'(: .l.l.l "'o<~::::<-,rr:: .a:~:'!. ~"':: '.'3~'.::
",1:( vv...\:,.':>>..... r:~'...I._l~"
NUUBER 0, LAl-J::S
(4-) ~\JV90:.II cr 1l.:'A.J'.'P J":~S
",.ort: ~OJ..O"'.l,rs l.'CT L.13~..!:t 0;.1\': :..-; '_H~~.
I
I
I
]
I
I
)
I
I
I .
I
I
I
I
I
EXISTING and PROJECTED
DEVELOPMENT
by
TRAFFIC ZONE
i.st1il_!~<._Jii_"
778 Tuscawilla Unit 11 66 .
778 Chelsea Woods 321
778 Bear Creek Estates 67
778 Chestnut Estates 51
505
110
153
50
72
72
72
72
72
72
Eagles Watch
Howell Creek
Creeks Run
Courtney SprinQs
Kash n' Karry Center
Yeager Commercial
82 Tuscawilla Unit 118
82 Tuscawilla Unit 12
82 Arrowhead Unit 1 (Parcels 3,4,5)
82 Fairway Oaks
82 Woodstream
82 Greenbriar
82 Wicklow Greens
82 Chesea Pare Phase 2
82 Chelsea Pare Phase 3(Fox Glen) .
82 Chelsea Pare Phase 4(Fox Glen II)
82 Bentley Green
82 Bentley Club
82 Glen Eaole Units 1,2 & 3
82 Carrington Woods
82 Davenport Glen
82 Chestnut Ridae
82 Tuscawilla Unit #13
82 Braewick
82 Tuscawilla Unit 7
-
783 Tuscawilla Unit 8
783 Tuscawilla Unit 9 & 98
783 Casa Park Villas
783 Tuscany Place
783 Indian Trails Middle School
783 Keeth Elementary
84 Schrimsher Town Center
84 The ReseNe at Tuscawilla
12/07/1999
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
32
313
28
90
o
72
32
172
17
36
57
15
44
41
257
76
70
52
39
85
79
1262
252
1
4 acres
252 1 0 32 0 4 acres 0
3
17
31
5
26
o
o
o
82
o
o
o
78
164
316
79 65
1
1
242 395 2 0 0 65 0 0
16.3 Acres
80 12
80 0 0 0 12 0 16.3 Acres 0
Page 1.of6
.--1
I o\;~gItjl____~".!~mj
I
83 Georgetown Units 1 ,2 & 3 214
83 Tusca Oaks 136
83 Wedgewood Tennis Villas 233
583 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
85 Sl. Johns Landing 10 21
85 McDonalds 1
85 Schrimsher Town Center 113 448 56 Acres
10 0 1 0 134 448 '56Acres 0
~ W.S. Municipal Building 1
785 W.S. Hiqh School 1
785 Bills Landscaping 1
785 Kingsbury Tract 1 27 Acres
785 Blumberg Tract 1 10 Acres
785 Central Winds Park 1
2 0 4 0 0 0 37 Acres 0
780 Arbor Glen 38
780 Tuscawilla Unit 6 89
780 St. Stephens . 1
780 Kinder Care 1
780 Seven-Eleven 1
780 Tuscawilla Realty 1
780 Tuscawilla Office Complex
127 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
781 Tuscawilla Unit 1 111
781 Tuscawilla Unit 2 65
781 Tuscawilla Unit 4 379
781 Wedgewood Units 1,2,& 3 128
781 Country Club Village 1.2. & 3 245
781 Arrowhead Unit 2 23 5
781 Arrowhead Unit 1 - (Partial) 6 2
781 Tuscawilla Country Club 1
957 0 1 0 7 0 0 0
782 Winter Springs Unit 3 129
129 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
788 Oak Forest Unit 1 1 14
788 Oak Forest Unit 2,2A & 2B 163
788 Oak Forest Unit 3 120
788 Oak Forest Unit 4 75
788 Tuscawilla Unit 5 10
788 Grand Reserve 14 2
496 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
12/07/1999
Page 2 of 6
! Sl~l~I_.&iiil._jtwjiiiiil..
786 Oak Forest Unit 5 (lots 468 to 561) 94
786 Oak Forest Unit 6 (lots 562 to 715) 154
786 Oak Forest Unit 7 (716 to 808) 93
786 Oak Forest Unit 8 (lots 809 to 940) 132
'I
473
87 L.D. Plante (unincorporated)
87 Winter SprinQs Post Office
87 Seminole Pines 102
87 Winding Hollow (east of Easement) 51
153
787 WindinQ Hollow 330
787 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 9 109
787 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 10 112
787 Stone Gable 50
787 Stone Gable Commercial
601
90 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 2 52
90 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 2A 196
90 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 5 22
90 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 8 72
90 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 1 (Pan 14
90 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 4 (Pan 4
360
88 Seville Chase 91
88 Dunmar Estates 20
111
791 Mosswood Apartments
791 Moss Glen Townhomes
791 The Vineyards 171
791 The Seasons 141.
791 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 4 (Pan 5
791 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 1 (Pan 25
342
o
o
o
1
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
147
10
157
o
o
12/07/1999
Page 3 of 6
o
o
o
o
o
o
100
12
112
6
o
o
o
6
0.5 acres
0,5 acres
o
o
3
3
3
9
o
o
o
19
19
o
o
o
2
5
7
o
o
o
1~1<<1~~_iiiir.i
790 Hacienda VillaQe 441 6
790 Pinewood Terrace 32
790 State Farm Insurance 1
790 Cumberland Farms 2
441
"
91 Walden Terrace 63
91 North Orlando 2nd Addition 170
91 Garden Club Apartments
91 N.O. Terrace Section 1 64
g'l N.O. Terrace Section 2 41
91 N. O. Terrace Section 3 77
91 N.O. Terrace Section 4 72
91 N.O. Terrace Section 5 45
91 N.O. Terrace Section 6 48
91 N.O. Terrace Section 8 64
Q' N.O. Terrace Section 9 58
-.
91 Foxmoor Unit 1 84
91 Foxmoor Unit 2 2
91 Foxmoor Unit 3 104
91 Foxmoor East 31
91 North Orlando Ranches Sec, 3 36
91 Winter Springs Elementary
91 Walqreens
91 Or. Martins
91 Winter Sprinqs Food/Used Appliances
91 Cahill Property
I 91 The Atrium
91 Winter Springs Plaza
91 Winter Sprinqs Vet
91 Storaqe World
959
32
3
o
6
o
o
o
40
3
1
1
1
2
40
1
1
7
o
3
o
o
o
12/07/1999
Page 4 of 6
I :'~*f___$J_._~___
i
i ;
I 92 Highlands Section 6 56
I 92 North Orlando 141
92 North Orlando 1 st Addition 138
92 North Orlando 4th Addition 242
92 North Orlando 5th Addition (partial) 34
92 North Orlando 8th Addition 22 .
92 Lori Ann Acres 64
92 Doug's Unit 10 56
I 92 Moss Road Quads 20
92 Indian Ridge 84
92 Deer Song 152
92 Fairfax Apartments 16
92 La Petite Nursery 1
92 Mr. Bubbles Car Wash 1
92 Or. Pete Corum
92 Banfield Funeral Home 1
92 Excelsior Park 1
92 Winter Springs Center 33
92 Barnett Bank 1
92 Village Market Place
92 Automotive One 1
92 Circle K 1
92 Public Works Complex 1
92 Fire Station 1
92 Public Safety Complex 1
, 633 392 43 0 0 0 0 0
93 Winter Springs Industrial Park
93 Broadway Gymnastics
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
94 Highlands Section 1 102
94 Highlands Section 2 41
94 Highlands Section 4 75
94 Highlands Section 7 & 8 57 1
94 Highlands (Blades Court) 8
94 Highlands East Quadraplxes '. 16
94 Highlands Patio Homes 25
94 Cypress Club 75
94 Cypress Village 22
94 Sheoah Section 2 144
94 Sheoah Section 3 28
94 Highland Village One 62
94 Highland Village Two 74 '.
94 Highland Lakes 41
94 Highlands Elementary School 1
94 Baytree 182
94 The Oaks ( credits owed) 19 8
1"" 11"\ r 111"\{){) 479 492 1 0 ",^G.:: t:: 9 0 0 0
~
. .:~:~i*liii~lf:~i~~~~~~jj~ili~li:
." .... ......... .....................P........,............,w.'..'..m....''''''.,,,,,,,,,..'..r.......".,,,,,,.,, &:: li; ..".,"".l*^..)1.l....~ ",J~..,..,.J~.~. .",...Jib!. xg"f" ^..w...~. . ,.~... .
I 95 Sheoah Site A 46
95 Golf Terrace Apa rtments 630
95 Wildwood 120 170
95 Seville on the Green 200
Q" Greenspoint 111 5
~:l
c- Highlands Section 5 41
_::J
95 Winter Springs Golf Course
95 Highlands Glen , 29
I Q- Sheoah Sec. I 44
_:l
95 Golfsid e Villas 20
I 95 Kia/Mitsubishi
I 345 1046 0 0 5 20 0 0
~c North Orlando Ranches See, 1 15 3
o~
\ 89 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 1A &1 55 3
89 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 6 37 2
I 39 North Orlando Ranches See 7 43 3
150 11
776 Morse 0 206
776 SprinQs LandinQ 60 0
776 I Cascells 0 0 0 270 67.5 acres
210 217 270 67.5 acres 0
71 Schrimsher 46.6 acres
71 Cascells 120 30 acres
0 0 0 0 0 120 76.6 acres 0
735 Blumberg 15 acres
785 Kingsbury 15 acres
i 785 Parker 36 19 acres
I 0 0 0 0 36 0 49 acres 0
I 35 Parks tone 353
I 86 Parkstone Commercial 13.7 acres
~~ Seminole County Facilities Main!. 1
~..,
0 0 0 1 353 0 13.7 acres 0
I
I
I
TOTALS 9963 2806 68 1 1 062 923 320.6 acres 0
,
12/07/1999
Page 6 of 6