HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007 12 10 Public Hearing 504 Aesthetic Review for Hayes Road PlazaCOMMISSION AGENDA
I Consent I I
Informational
ITEM 5 0 4 Public Hearing X
~ Regular ~ , ~
December 10, 2007
Meeting
REQUEST:
The Community Development Department- Planning Division requests the City Commission
hold a Public Hearing for the Aesthetic Review for the Hayes Road Plaza, located on the
southwest corner of SR 434 and Hayes Road.
PURPOSE: To encourage creative, effective, and flexible architectural standards and cohesive
community development consistent with the intent and purpose of Article XI -Minimum
Community Appearance and Aesthetic Review Standards.
APPLICABLE LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY:
Chapter 9, Article XII. Minimum Community Appearance and Aesthetic Review Standards.
Section 9-601. Approval prerequisite for permits.
Section 9-603. Procedure.
Section 9-605. Submittal requirements.
Chapter 20, Division 3. General Design Standards for Redevelopment Area.
CHRONOLOGY:
February 22, 2006 -Concept plan fora 20,100 SF commercial center was submitted.
January 22, 2007 -Preliminary engineering/site plan approved by Commission.
March 7, 2007 - Aesthetic review package was submitted.
January 5, 2007 -Revised aesthetic review plans submitted to City.
March 29, 2007 -Final engineering/site plan and 2°d aesthetic review packages received.
November 14, 2007 -Final engineering/site plan approved by Commission, subject to
conditions.
CONSIDERATIONS:
The Hayes Road Plaza is a 17,128 SF single-story shopping center, including a 2,840 SF
restaurant, on what is presently a 1.99 acre site abutting Hacienda Village and the Cumberland
Farms convenience store/gas station site. The site, located at the southwest corner of the SR 434
and Hayes Road intersection, is subject to the SR 434 Redevelopment Overlay Zoning District
December 10, 2007
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 504
Page 2 of 3
regulations. As required by Code, a 6 foot tall masonry wall is proposed between the site and
Hacienda Village. Further, no more than 0.5 foot candle of light maybe spilled onto the
Hacienda Village site.
The color renderings depict what the building will look like, both with and without the proposed
landscaping. Spaces are depicted on the building facade for building-mounted multi-tenant
signage, to demonstrate where these signs would be appropriate. Although more than one space
for signage is depicted to show all possible spaces for signage, only one building-mounted sign is
allowed per tenant, at a maximum of 2' tall and a width of up to 70 percent of the linear
storefront that the business occupies. Signage must be consistent in size, materials and
placement. No ground-mounted signage has been proposed for the site.
The submittal requirements for aesthetic review are set forth in Section 9-605 and include the
following: (a) a site plan; (b) elevations illustrating all sides of structures facing public streets or
spaces; (c) illustrations of all walls, fences, and other accessory structures and the indication of
height and their associated materials; (d) elevation of proposed exterior permanent signs or other
constructed elements other than habitable space, if any; (e) illustrations of materials, texture, and
colors to be used on all buildings, accessory structures, exterior signs; and (f) other architectural
and engineering data as maybe required. The procedures for review and approval are set forth
in Section 9-603.
The City Commission may approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove the application only
after consideration of whether the following criteria have been satisfied:
(1) The plans and specifications of the proposed project indicate that the setting, landscaping,
proportions, materials, colors, textures, scale, unity, balance, rhythm, contrast, and simplicity are
coordinated in a harmonious manner relevant to the particular proposal, surrounding area and
cultural character of the community.
The proposed building is to be constructed of concrete block covered with stucco. The building's
varied roofline, water table, and expression line enhance its appearance as do quoins at the
corners. This style and color combination should be a welcome addition to this area.
(2) The plans for the proposed project are in harmony with any future development which has
been formally approved by the City within the surrounding area.
The proposed project is in harmony with the Miller School Supply site and Bruster's. No other
more recent site plans have been submitted in this area.
(3) The plans for the proposed project are not excessively similar or dissimilar to any other
building, structure or sign which is either fully constructed, permitted but not fully constructed,
or included on the same permit application, and facing upon the same or intersecting street within
five hundred (500) feet of the proposed site, with respect to one or more of the following features
of exterior design and appearance:
(A) Front or side elevations,
(B) Size and arrangement of elevation facing the street, including reverse arrangement,
December 10, 2007
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 504
Page 3 of 3
(C) Other significant features of design such as, but not limited to: materials, roof line,
hardscape improvements, and height or design elements.
The proposed building is tastefully designed and does not appear excessively similar or dissimilar
to the other structures in the immediate area.
(4) The plans for the proposed project are in harmony with, or significantly enhance, the
established character of other buildings, structures or signs in the surrounding area with respect
to architectural specifications and design features deemed significant based upon commonly
accepted architectural principles of the local community.
The proposed building has a contextually appropriate architectural style and includes design
features and detailing that accentuate the building and enhance the established character of the
existing structures in the area.
(5) The proposed project is consistent and compatible with the intent and purpose of this Article,
the Comprehensive Plan for Winter Springs, design criteria adopted by the city (e.g. Towne
Center guidelines, SR 434 design specifications) and other applicable federal state or local laws.
The Hayes Road Plaza aesthetic package meets the requirements of the City's design criteria as
specified in the Code.
(6) The proposed project has incorporated significant architectural enhancements such as
concrete masonry units with stucco, marble, termite-resistant wood, wrought iron, brick, columns
and piers, porches, arches, fountains, planting areas, display windows, and other distinctive
design detailing and promoting the character of the community.
The project is attractive and will be an asset to the community, given the architectural
enhancements already mentioned.
However, the signage package, as proposed, must be revised and brought forward for a separate
aesthetic review and possible development agreement.
FINDINGS:
^ The proposed project is consistent and compatible with the SR 434 design specifications.
^ The new building will utilize colors and materials that complement the adjacent neighborhood.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff review found the applicant's request for Aesthetic Review in compliance and recommends
approval of the Aesthetic Review package.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Aesthetic Review Package
COMMISSION ACTION:
EAST ELEVATION
NORTH ELEVATION
'. Y[tRAWIW YfiR ~WIB
,~~.~P
>;
~K~
N.T.S.
4c*.a ~wr.vc
Y[*k.~wc
wrs
o S C 0 T T
N
ac
• '
7.
K
O
Conceptual Elevations - North I East I West
October 24, 2007
ATION
N.T.S.
~,_.~ I I+~N 8
I~L-~ ~~y
~' m
Lt ~
l f~
NORTH
434 Retail
N.T.S. , t ~ 'i +~ ~/
L~ ~~~ ~~e ~ . ~ ~~~ ~ ~ - E_ - -rte - ~ - ~_
I~ ~ N ~ !4 N ~ 1 r x,0`
04
ELEVATION
;,; ,WEST ELEVATION
vv ~ N.T.S.
..,
~..~ ~.~
~- unKAwec
o S C 0 T T
s
N
K
Z
K
L
a
Conceptual Elevations - North l East I West (Landscape Omitted)
October 24, 2007
NORTH
434 Retail
~{
~ ~ N 9Z~ZI
I `r-1 a ~ DDt
~~1
~~~~, NORTH ELEVATION
~~, N.LS
SOUTH ELEVATION (WALL OMITTED
N.T.S.
N.T
Stucco Finishes Trim Storefront
Tansy Green Ryegrass Ecru Netsuke Ivoire Restrained Gold Burlap Black Finish
SW6424 SW6423 SW6135 SW6134 SW6127 SW6129 SW6137 ',
Sherwin Williams YKK
Metal Roof I Awning
Tundra Almond
MBCI
Water Table Quoins
Mossy Gold Netsuke
SW6139 SW6134
ArcusStone
45 C O T T
z
6
Conceptual Elevations -South
October 18, 2007
434 Retail
SOUTH ELEVATION
N.T.S.
Oy
SOUTH ELEVATION
N.T.S.
_ 'c _
__-___.___. _. _,_....___O
0 a
' N.T.S.
Stucco Finishes Trim Storefront Metal Roof /Awning Water Table Quoins
~ .. ~`
._
.. ..
a. , , q.
' -- - -_ - n. ;._ R.
Tansy Green Ryegrass Ecru Netsuke Ivoire Restrained Gold Burlap Bladc Finish Tundra Almond Mossy Gold Netsuke
SW6424 SW6423 SW6135 SW6134 SW6127 SW6129 SW6137 SW6139 SW6134
Sherwin Williams YKK MBCI ArcusStone
EXTERIOR FINISHES
N.T.S.
oS C O T T
s
N
R
7.
f
Y
6
Conceptual Elevations -South (Landscape Omitted )
October 18, 2007
434 Retail
C~ WEST DUMPSTER ELEVATION ~ NORTH DUMPSTER ELEVATION
05 N.T.S. ` 04 N.T.S.
It
:Y
,~
~~ *;~,
CIVIL SITE PLAN
1t
~.l l
e~
~°
w
1
N.T.S.
o S C O T T
N
Y
Z
K
I
s
Additional Drawings
October 18, 2007
NORTH
TYP. AWNING ~ TYP. CANOPY
02 N.T.S. 01 N.T.S.
434 Reta i I