HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001 12 10 Public Hearings B First Reading - Ordinance 2001-58 Changing the Zoning Map Designation
COMMISSION AGENDA
ITEM B
Consent
Informational
Public Hearing X
Regular
(J~
December 10, 2001
Meeting
Mgr. / Attor /
Authorizatio .
REQUEST:
The Community Development Department requests the City Commission conduct a public hearing
for the first reading of Ordinance 2001- 58, which would change the zoning map designation of a
49.55-acre parcel from "Planned Unit Development (Seminole County) to "Planned Unit
Development" (Winter Springs).
The subject property is located on Dovera Drive, north of Red Bug Lake Road, within the Oviedo
Marketplace Development of Regional Impact (DRI).
PURPOSE:
The purpose ofthis Agenda Item is to request the Commission hold a public hearing for first reading
of Ordinance 2001-58 to assign a City zoning map designation of "Planned Unit Development" to
Parcel 14 of the Oviedo Marketplace DR!.
APPLICABLE LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY:
Section 20-102(e) of the City of Winter Springs Code of Ordinances states, "The city planner,
or. . . .such other individuals as may be designated to perform such duties by the City Commission,
shall maintain the official as well as the working zoning maps...."
Section 20-104 of the City's Code of Ordinances states, "The City Commission may from time to
CDDfNovember 29, 2001/10:49 AM
December 10, 2001
PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM B
Page 2
time amend, supplement, change or repeal the regulations, restrictions or district boundaries and
designations as set out in this ordinance after a public hearing( s). . .."
Section 20-355 outlines the procedure for approval of a "Planned Unit Development" and Section
20-356 describes the minimum identified exhibits and supporting materials that must be contained
on the accompanying Preliminary Development Plan.
CONSIDERATIONS:
1. The property was in the unincorporated portion of the County until it was annexed in 1995.
2. The property was never assigned a City zoning designation, as required by Chapter 20, Article III
of the City's Code of Ordinances.
3. This request was submitted concurrent with a request to change the future land use map (PLUM)
designation for the same property.
FINDINGS:
1. Article N, Section 20-356 of the City's Code of Ordinances describes the requirements for PUD
zoning, based on a preliminary development plan. The preliminary development plan, as
submitted, meets the criteria defined by that chapter by demonstrating the following:
A. Shows the name, location, legal description, acreage and type of planned unit development;
B. Identifies the present owners of the land; a developer has yet to be determined;
C. Identifies all consultants involved in the preparation of the preliminary development plan;
D. Shows a vicinity map indicating the relationship between the planned unit development and
the surrounding area;
E. Shows existing topography and other natural features;
F. Shows a soil survey indicating the location and description of soil types;
G. Describes existing vegetation and which natural areas will be preserved, altered or
eliminated;
H. Shows a proposed land use plan; however, priority and phasing of development has yet to be
demonstrated; and
I. Shows proposed method of providing utilities and infrastructure;
CDDfNovember 29, 2001/10:49 AM
December 10, 2001
PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM B
Page 3
2. On October 3, 2001, the Planning and Zoning Board recommended approval of the rezoning
request, subject to the conditions recommended by staff.
3. On November 12,2001, the City Commission adopted Ordinance 2001-45, which would change
the future land use designation of the property from "Planned Development" and "Conservation
Overlay" (Seminole County) to "Mixed Use" (Winter Springs), should DCA find the large-scale
FLUM amendment in compliance
4. On November 12, 2001, the City Commission approved the accompanying DR! development
order.
5. On November 19, 2001, the City transmitted the large-scale FLUM package to DCA for
compliance review; the proposed zoning is consistent with the proposed future land use
designation.
6. This request to the City Commission represents the next sequential step in the approval process.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
This rezoning request is being filed concurrently with a future land use map amendment for the
subject property. The City Commission conducted a public hearing to adopt the proposed future land
use amendment on November 12, 2001, and the adopted plan amendment was subsequently
transmitted to DCA for compliance review. Following this review, a Notice of Intent to find the
amendment in compliance or not in compliance will be issued within 45 calendar days by DCA.
Assuming there are no petitions to challenge the determination of compliance/non compliance within
21 calendar days after the date of publication, the Notice ofIntent will become final agency action.
However, the City Commission can conduct a public hearing for the second reading of Ordinance
2001-58 prior to final agency action, which would approve the preliminary development plan and
assign a City zoning designation of "Planned Unit Development" to the subject property. The
adoption of Ordinance 2001-58 would then be contingent upon the approval of the future land use
amendment by DCA.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Commission approve first reading of Ordinance 2001-58 and move
this item to second reading.
CDDfNovember 29,2001111:41 AM
December 10, 2001
PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM B
Page 4
LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY RECOMMENDATION:
On October 3,2001, the Planning and Zoning Board recommended that the property be rezoned
from "Planned Unit Development" (Seminole County) to "Planned Unit Development" (Winter
Springs), pursuant to the following conditions suggested by staff:
1. Parking by trucks, tractor trailers or similar vehicles shall be limited to 72 hours.
2. Outdoor sales shall not be permitted in vehicle accommodation areas.
3. The sales of goods and/or services from trucks, trailers, or similar equipment shall be
prohibited.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Ordinance 2001-58
B. October 3,2001 Local Planning Agency staff report
C. October 3,2001 Local Planning Agency approved minutes
D. Proposed Master Development Plan
E. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application Portfolio (previously submitted)
COMMISSION ACTION:
CDDfNovember 29,2001111 :41 AM
ATTACHMENT A
ORDINANCE NO. 2001-58
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA REZONING A
PARCEL OF LAND APPROXIMATELY 49.551 ACRES,
MORE OR LESS, WHICH IS LOCATED GENERALLY ON
DOVERA DRIVE NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF RED BUG
LAKE DRIVE AND THE CENTRAL FLORIDA GREENWAY
AND ALSO KNOWN AS PARCEL 14 OF THE OVIEDO
MARKETPLACE DRI FROM SEMINOLE COUNTY ZONING
DESIGNATION "PLANNED UNlT DEVELOPMENT" TO
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS ZONING DESIGNATION
"PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT"; PROVIDING FOR
REPEAL OF PRIOR INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES AND
RESOLUTIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, On October 3,2001, the Planning and Zoning Board recommended approval
of this rezoning based on the testimony and information presented before the Board; and
WHEREAS, Based on the recommendation of City staff, the Planning and Zoning Board,
and review of the competent substantial evidence presented to the City Commission on this rezoning
application, the City Commission hereby finds that rezoning the subject real property as set forth
herein constitutes a legitimate public purpose; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission hereby finds that this Ordinance is in the best interests of
the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Winter Springs.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Zoning Designation Amended. The zoning designation of the real property legally
described and depicted on Exhibit "A," which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference, is hereby amended from Seminole County "Planned Unit Development" to City of Winter
Springs "Planned Unit Development." Upon the effective date of this Ordinance, City Staffis hereby
instructed to amend the Official Zoning Map of the City of Winter Springs to fully reflect this
amendment.
Section 2. Repeal of Prior Inconsistent Ordinances and Resolutions. All prior inconsistent
ordinances and resolutions adopted by the City Commission, or parts of ordinances and resolutions
in conflict herewith, are hereby repealed to the extent of the conflict.
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2001-58
Page I of 2
Section 3. Severability. Ifany section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, word or provision
of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent
jurisdiction, whether for substantive, procedural, or any other reason, such portion shall be deemed
a separate, distinct and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions of this ordinance.
Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon Ordinance
No. 2001-45 becoming effective. If Ordinance No. 2001-45 does not become effective, then this
Ordinance shall be deemed null and void.
ADOPTED by the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, in a regular
meeting assembled on the _ day of , 2001.
PauIP.Partyka,~ayor
ATTEST:
Andrea Lorenzo-Luaces, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
AND SUFFICIENCY FOR THE CITY
OF WINTER SPRINGS ONLY:
Anthony A. Garganese, City Attorney
First Reading:
Second Reading and Adoption:
Effective Date:
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2001-58
Page 2 of 2
8h".b,T- "A- II
,
PA-~1- I .
r1\e~s +- R:;wr.J.J YVcsc~V'T>t/h
Page 1.4
B. Legal Description
LEGAL DESCHIPTlON
A TRACT OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 21 SOUTH, RANGE 31 SAST DESCRIBED
AS FOll.OWS:
"
COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 12, OVIEDO CROSSiNG .
PHASE 1 B, ACCORDING TO lliE PLAT lliEREOF AS RECORDED IN ?lA T BOOK
47, PAGES 80, 81, 82. AND 83 OF THE PUBUC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE
COUNTY, AS THE POINT OF BEGINNJNG: THENCE RUN TriE RJll.OWlNG
COURSES ALONG TflE NORlH UNE OF. SAIDlar 1.2.; NORnf 72046'440 WEST,
63.09 FEET; SOUTri 63005'12" WEST, 61,20 F..:!; sqlfrn 53050"'300 EAST,
4.28 FEET; 'SOUTH. 1600S'SS" EAST,. is.85. FEET; SCU1H 3qoQ3'21' EAST,
19.28 FEET: SO.UTH 16006'18:' WEST, lalS. FEET; SOUTH 17013'240 EAST,
23.03 FEET; SOUTH 62056~25" WEsr, 24.8.6- FEET; SOUTH SS039'42" WEST,
22.91 FEET; SOlIili 40051'2r WEST.., 19.28 fEET; S'OUTH 14041'54~ WEST,
39.45 FEET; SOIJiH 07028'11" WEST, .53.00 FEET; SOUlli 0305.4.'47" EAST,
17.13 FEET; SOUTH 04032'01" 'WE:>>'""T., 32.26 FEET; SOUTH 10023'420 EASr,
27.27 FEET; SOUTH 21025'56" EAST, 25.94 FEET; SOUTH 57013'53" EAST,
26.73 FEET; SOUTH 22030'24" EAST, 30.02 R:.ET; SOUTH 17032'14" WEST,
34.51 FEET; SOUTH 12034'08. WEST,. '35.F1 FE..cr; SOUTH. 20039-55. EAST.
50.30 FEET; SOUTH 1404738. WEST, 33.0'- FEET; SOUTK 380~47" wEsT,
36.55 FEET; SOUTH 69023~30. WEST, 3fJ.n fEE'I:; SOUTH 83013"35" WEST,
31.96 feET; NOaTH 83026'48" WEST, 29.09 FEET; SOUTH 86046"10. WEST,
122.80 'F""eET; NORTH 8]033'11" WEST, 45.67 FEET; SOUTH 69021-"35" wEsT,
21.26 FEET; NORTH. 87032'46" WEST, 146.71 FEET: THENCE. DEi'ARTaNG SAtD
NORTH UNE OF toT 12, RUN NORni 570'24'04. EAST, 29.61 FEEl; THEtiCE
RUN. NORTH 00047'25" EAST, 484.46 FEET TO A CURVE CONCAVE
NORTHERLY; THENCE RUN WESTERlY AND THEN NORTHEnLY ALONG SA:D
CURVe, HAVING A RADIUS LENGTH OF 750.00 Farr. A CENTIW. ANGlE OF
138043"54", AN AnC LENGTH OF 1817.09 FEET, A CHORD (J3'qGTH OF f404.16
FEET, AND A QI.oRD BEARlNG OF NORlli 19016'44" WE5T; THENCE RUN
NORTH 43"50'01" EAST, 41S.30 FCET TO THE sournS\LY UNE OF
ru'SCAWlLlA UNIT 7, ACCORDING TO THE PlAT ll-ifRECF, AS RECCRCED .IN
PlAT BOOK 22. PAGES 46 AND 47 'OF THE PUBUC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE
COUNl:Y, R.OR1DA;~ 'niENCE aUN ALONG '[HE. SOUTHERLY lJNE Of' SAlO
TUSKAWlUA UNIT 7; SOllTH 70000-29" EAST, 664.21 Fa:r TO THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAIO' PlAT: lliENCE RUN SOUTH 01001'52" EAST,
319.02 FE8'; TH8'lCE RUN SOUTH.89037'40-~ EAST, 520.75 FEET; THENCE RUN
sourri 14032'19- EAST, 169.91 F.:Ei: lliENCE RUN SOUTH 71020'10. EAST,
164.74 F""eET TO A POINT ON THE WESTEnLY RlGHT-oF-WAY OF lliE
PROPOSED OVIEDO CROSSJNG' TERRACE; THENCE RUN ALONG SAlD ?ROPOSED
WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE THE .FOllOWlNG COURSES; soum 55015'44.
WEST, 200.22 F"'c...t:'f TO A CURVE CONCAVE SOVT.HEASTERl.Y; lliENq: RtjN
SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID OJRVE HAVING A RADIUS LENGTH OF 950.00
FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 19006'05", AN ARC lENGTH OF 316.11 rEf-I, A
CHORD LENGTH OF 315.25 I-=cf,' AND A ~ORD BEARJNG OF SOUT"
45042' 41. WEST; lliENCE RUN SOUTH 36009'39- WEST, 275.09 F"'=! TO A
CURVE CCNCAVE SOUlliE'ASTERLY; lliENCE_ RUN SOUTI-lWESTSLY ALONG
SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS LENGTH OF 800.00 FE-cr, A CENTRAl ANGLE .
OF 17048'35., AN. ARC LENGTH OF 248.57 FEET, A CHORD IJ:N~ OF 247.67
FEET, AND A CHORD BEARlNG OF SOUTH 270'15'22" WEST TO THE AFORESAID
NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 12 AND' THE. POINT OF BEGINNING.
THE A30VE DESaU8ED TAACT OF. lAND UES IN SEMINOLE COUNTY, R.OAlDA AND CClIlT -:'INS
49.551 A(AES, MeRE OR LESS.
City of Winter Springs -' Oviedo :"'Iarketplace
CO/1/f}rehensive Plan Amendment
.~. 3'...~!-Y.1t~\~~~~t..\'
. ~:::
C>'h,h,f 11,4-1.\
. f~~.....
~~.4ry ~f'c.-.b~. OJ{) 'y
I
I
'-1
'-
..
I
oviedo marketplace
'co
>
- .~
,,0
to
Q)
'"b
~ 0 _...--
\ /~:a.d _..-ii-iC-.-=-.._.
... . ."- ~ .
../ ~ ~ ,,!,.' fl).'f-~(",.'
- -. · -,. ~~~ <o~~ \.)"::~'_.'~~--'-:::::::;;'-iii-:::-=:::::::.. ·
~fQ. .
("
1________
\
\
'. RetalVOffice
~
,?'~
~
.%'.
..' &
.' '.~
.......
......
.:..-.....
OC.ATTING
JACItIOH
1t8ltCH81t
"NGLIN
LOP8Z
ItIHBH....T
legend:
Site BOUndary - Parcel 14
-.. .... Oviedo Mar1<etplace' Property
_ Wetland Preservation Area
.. .....-. '.'~::) Upland Preservation Area
Scale In Feet
/
o
Source: P.f.UMarch 200f
I
400 800
- '....
Upland Enhancement Area
Retail/Office f 60,000 Square Feet
Drainage F.asemem
250' Setback from Residemial
\:'
\..!~ (. If" .
I
!dOITI ~l ,'10,"1-1", ':1 ('n
. #...,
-..-.
r..
'"
'"
- -
Nolth
(t)
I "
I
ATTACHMENT B
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD - LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
REGULAR AGENDA ITEM
October 3, 2001
B. Oviedo Marketplace Zoning Map Amendment
STAFF REPORT
APPLICABLE LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY
Of11cial Zoning Map Amendment
Chapter 20, Article IV contains the review requirements for PUD (planned Unit Development) zoning.
Section 20-355 requires that the staff Development Review Committee (DRC) review a PUD
application and submit a recommendation to the Local Planning Agency (LP A). The LP A is required to
conduct a public hearing to consider the change of zoning request, along with the preliminary
development plan required for PUD zoning. The LP A will recommend approval, approval with
modifications, or denial of the request to the City Commission, who will subsequently conduct a public
hearing to review the preliminary development plan and consider recommendations from staff and the
LP A. Based on the City Commission's decision, the applicant will submit a final development plan that
will be subject to staff review and LP A action, prior to final approval by the City Commission.
I.
SUMMARY OF APPLICATION
A. Applicant:
Carey S. Hayo, Principal
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin
Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
33 East Pine Street
Orlando, Florida 32801
Owner:
The Viera Company
7380 Murrell Road, Suite 201
Viera, Florida 32940
B. Request:
The applicants request an amendment to the City's Official Zoning Map, to change the
Future Land Use Classification on the subject property from (Seminole County) PUD and
Conservation Overlay to (Winter Springs) PUD. Prior to this request, the applicants
submitted a request to amend the Future Land Use Map (FLUM), along with a revision to
the adopted (Seminole County) Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Development
Order for Parcel 14 of Oviedo Marketplace. The comprehensive plan amendment is
currently under review by the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA).
1
P&z Board Meeting - October 3, 2001
Zoning Map Amendment - Oviedo Marketplace
C. Purpose:
The purpose of the request is to assign a City zoning classification to the site, similar to the
current Seminole County Planned Development designation, which would allow the site to
be developed in a manner consistent with the DRI Development Order and future land use
classification currendy under review.
D. Site Information:
1. Parcel Number -17-21-31-300-001H-OOOO
2. Acreage - 49.55 acres
3. General Location - The site is located on Dovera Drive, near the intersection of
Red Bug Lake Road and the Central Florida Greeneway. The site corresponds to
Parcel 14 of the Oviedo Marketplace DR!.
4. Legal Description - See attachment C
5. Chronology of Subject Property - The subject property is part of the Oviedo
Marketplace DRI, which was approved in 1988. The DRI is currendy located in
three jurisdictions, which include the City of Oviedo, the City of Winter Springs, and
Seminole County. When the subject property (parcel 14) was annexed into the City
of Winter Springs in 1995, neither a FLUM or zoning classification was assigned to
the property. For development purposes, the site is required to have City FLUM
and zoning categories.
6. Existing Land Use - The property is currendy vacant. Adjacent existing land uses,
zoning and FLUM designations include the following:
Existing Land Uses Zoning FLUM
I
Subject Site Vacant PUD (SC) PD, Cons. Overlay (SC)
North _~E2gle- f amjJ.r.B.:~~.~~~~al __ _~UI?j~~~L__ LDR (WS)
t-----.---------
South Commercial PUD (SC) PD (SC)
._--- M H....__._______.H.______._ ----.-.----.-.-- f---.---.------------------.--
East Vacant & Commercial PUD (SC & 0) HIP (SC)
_.____H.___________.________.___,_ --------'-- f--.-.------
Wedands PUD (0) Conse~~!!?~j.?.2..__________
--.-------- ---.--.------.,---..--,----- -----.-
West FPL Easement & Single- R-1A (SC) LDR (SC)
Family Residential
(WS) Winter Springs; (SC) Seminole County; (0) Oviedo
7. Development Trends - With the development of the Oviedo Marketplace, this area
of Red Bug Lake Road has developed into a combination of commercial, office and
medical uses. The applicant is planning to develop a mixture of retail and office uses
on the site, while leaving more than half of the property as open space. The
proposed land uses are consistent with the general character of the area.
8. Letters/Phone Calls In Favor Or Opposition - Prior to initiating the
comprehensive plan amendment and DRI Development Order requests, the
applicant held neighborhood meetings in May 2001 to explain the proposal to
neighboring residents. However, no residents attended the meetings.
2
P&z Board Meeting - October 3, 2001
Zoning Map Amendment - Oviedo Marketplace
II. ~AUL"SIS
A. Official Zoning Map:
The applicant is requesting PUD zoning for the entire site. The site is currently shown as
PUD on the Seminole County Official Zoning Map. Assuming the Comprehensive Plan
Amendment is approved by DCA, the proposed PUD zoning, along with the Mixed Use
FLUM designation would allow flexibility and efficiency in the design of future
development.
B. Public Facilities:
1. Roads/Transportation - The subject property will be accessed from Dovera
Drive, which connects with the mall parcel to the north and Red Bug Lake Road to
the south. When the DR! was originally reviewed, the impact of the proposed uses
on the road network was analyzed in great detail. Monitoring and traffic impact
studies have also been prepared. The DRI development order lists transportation
improvements and mitigation measures that are required for the subject property,
prior to its construction as a part of Phase 3. They include the following:
· Red Bug Lake and S.R436: Prior to the development of Phase 3a, the developer is
required to pay a proportionate share for an intersection improvement study.
This requirement has been met by the developer.
. S.R 434 and S.R 426: Prior to the development of Phase 3a, the developer is
required to extend Division Street from Michelle Hammock Road to C.R. 419 in
a 2-lane configuration. Also, the developer will be required to provide 5 acres
for wetland mitigation.
· S.R 426: Prior to the development of Phase 3b (subject site), the developer is
required to widen S.R.426 to four lanes, from Mitchell Hammock Road to
Winter Springs Boulevard.
The Oviedo Marketplace mall is currently served by LYNX Bus Route 4. The TDP
for LYNX shows that new service and the re-alignment of routes are scheduled for
2002. At that time, there will be three routes serving the Oviedo Marketplace, which
will expand existing capacity.
2. Sanitary Sewer, Potable Water, Solid Waste, Stormwater Management -
. Sanitary Sewer and Potable Water. Seminole County currently provides water and
sanitary sewer service to Oviedo marketplace and is anticipated to be the
provider of these services to Parcel 14 as well. The Settlement Agreement states
that it may be possible for the services to be assigned to the City of Winter
Springs via a utility service agreement between Seminole County and the City of
Winter Springs. Based on the projected service demand for Parcel 14, there is
sufficient capacity to serve the development without lowering the County's
adopted level of service. The applicant has submitted a letter from the Seminole
County Environmental Services Department stating the County's ability to
provide water and sewer service to the subject property.
3
P&z Board Meeting - October 3, 2001
Zoning Map Amendment - Oviedo Marketplace
· Solid Waste: No hazardous wastes are expected to occur on the subject property.
However, the Development Order states, "the Developer shall prepare and
submit a Draft Hazardous Materials Management Plan to the Florida
Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) for review and approva1."
The FDEP ensures that adequate hazardous materials and waste management
and disposal procedures are implemented.
· Stormwater Management: The DRI has a master drainage system, designed and
permitted through the St. John's Water Management District (SJWMD) and
Seminole County, and is maintained by the Dovera Community Development
District (DCDD). The stonnwater management for the subject property will
meet the standards of FDEP, SJRMWD and the level of service established by
the City.
3. Recreation and Open Space - The proposed development does not include a
residential component. Therefore, there is not a requirement for recreational
facilities. The development, however, will provide approximately 34 acres (over 50%
of the site) of open space, to be preserved through a conservation easement
dedicated to the DCDD.
4. Police and Fire - The proposed land use classification will not create a negative
impact on the current level of service for City Police and Fire facilities.
C. Nuisance Potential Of Proposed Use To Surrounding Land Uses:
The development of the site under the PUD zoning designation will not have an adverse
impact on surrounding properties. The City's Comprehensive Plan requires 'a minimum
buffer of 25 feet between adjacent residential and commercial uses. However, a Settlement
Agreement (August 1995) between the City of Oviedo, the City of Winter Springs and the
owner of the Oviedo Marketplace property, requires that development be no closer than 250
feet from the boundary of Ovideo Marketplace development and adjacent residential uses.
This includes roads, parking, buildings and active uses. There are also restrictions on
building height and a wall provided where existing natural vegetation does not exist along
the boundary. As noted above, over 50% of the site will be preserved as open space,
providing a natural and visual buffer between non-residential uses and residential uses to the
west and north. Also, the subject property will be accessed from a road that leads to the
Oviedo Marketplace mall. No commercial traffic will be directed toward or onto any
residential streets.
D. Natural Lands Compatibility:
1. Soils - There are two distinct soil types on the subject property, which include
swamp and sand. Swamp corresponds to the wetlands to be preserved, and fine
sand comprises the developable portion of the site. These are generally associated
with transitional soils, and are often found in nearly level tracts, adjacent to wet areas
of tlatwoods connected to low lands. The soils on the eastern portion of the site are
adequate for development.
4
P&z Board Meeting - October 3, 2001
Zoning Map Amendment - Oviedo Marketplace
2. Topography - The site is generally flat, with a variation of 5 feet between the lowest
and highest grades.
3. Flood Prone Areas - The subject site is not within the 100-year flood prone area.
4. Natural Resources - The developer will be required to protect the wetlands on the
site. A conservation easement has already been dedicated to the DCDD. There are
no endangered plants on the property.
5. Wildlife - The bald eagle nest originally identified on the property was abandoned
for more than five years. The Florida Game and Fresh Water Commission has
determined that the restrictions previously related to the nest no longer apply. The
proposed Development Order to be adopted by the City of Winter Springs does not
make any references to the nest. There are no other endangered, threatened or
species of special concern known to occur on the site. The Development Order
states that if any other endangered, threatened or special concern species are found
on the site, development will cease, and the Florida Game and Fresh Water
Commission would be notified.
6. Historic/Archaeological Resources - There are no known significant historical or
archaeological resources located on the site.
E. Consistency With The Comprehensive Plan:
The proposed PUD zoning classification is consistent with the Mixed Use large scale
Comprehensive Plan amendment previously considered and recommended for approved by
the LP A. The request to change the existing (Seminole County) PUD zoning designation to
the City's PUD zoning designation is also consistent with the goals, objectives and policies
of the City's comprehensive plan.
III. FINDINGS
1. Article IV, Section 20-355 of the City's Code of Ordinances describes the requirements
for PUD zoning, based on a preliminary development plan. This application meets the
criteria defined by this chapter.
2. On June 6, 2001, the LP A recommended approval of the large scale comprehensive plan
amendment request for transmittal to DCA, which would change the FLUM designation
from (Seminole County) PUD and Conservation Overlay to (Winter Springs) Mixed Use
if approved. The requested zoning would be consistent with this recommendation.
3. On August 13, 2001, the City Commission followed the recommendations of staff and
the LP A and approved transmittal of the large scale comprehensive plan amendment
request to DCA for review.
IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Even though the request to change the zoning of the subject property is being reviewed
concurrent with a request to change the FLUM designation for the same property, final action
on the rezoning request would not precede DCA's final decision on the large scale
5
P&z Board Meeting - October 3, 2001
Zoning Map Amendment - Oviedo Marketplace
comprehensive plan (FLUM) amendment. Final approval of the rezoning request (by the City
Commission) could only occur after approval of the large scale comprehensive plan amendment
by DCA. In light of this information, staff recommends approval of the request to change the
zoning classification of Parcel 14 of the Oviedo Marketplace DRI from (Seminole County) PUD
to (Winter Springs) PUD, with the following conditions:
A. Parking by trucks, tractor trailers or similar vehicles shall be limited to 72 hours.
B. Outdoor sales shall not be permitted in vehicle accommodation areas.
C. The sales of goods and/or services from trucks, trailers, or similar equipment shall be
prohibited.
v. ATTACHMENTS
A. Maps
B. Legal Description
C. Transmittal Letter and Application
D. (proposed) Winter Springs Development Order
E. July 6, 2001 LPA Staff Report for Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment
6
ATTACHMENT C
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
REGULAR MEETING
OCTOBER 3,2001
I. CALL TO ORDER
The Planning And Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency Regular Meeting was called to
order Wednesday, October 3, 2001, at 7:05 p.m. by Chairman Bill Fernandez in the
Commission Chambers of the Municipal Building (City Hall, 1126 East State Road 434,
Winter Springs, Florida 32708).
Roll Call:
Chairman Bill Fernandez, present
Vice Chairman Tom Brown, present
Board Member Brent Gregory, present
Board Member Rosanne Karr, present
Board Member Carl Stephens, Jr., present
The Pledge of Allegiance followed.
The Members of the Board discussed Agenda changes. With consensus of the Board, it
was agreed that Regular Agenda Item "B" would be heard first following the Consent
Agenda.
II. CONSENT
CONSENT
A. Approval of the August 1, 2001 Regular Meeting Minutes.
MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER STEPHENS. "I MOTION THAT WE ACCEPT
THE MINUTES." SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER KARR. DISCUSSION.
WITH CONSENSUS OF THE BOARD, THE MOTION WAS APPROVED.
MOTION CARRIED.
CONSENT
B. Approval of the August 7, 2001 Special Meeting Minutes.
MOTION BY VICE CHAIRMAN BROWN. "I MOVE THAT WE ACCEPT THE
MINUTES." SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER KARR. DISCUSSION. WITH
CONSENSUS OF THE BOARD, THE MOTION WAS APPROVED.
MOTION CARRIED.
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
REGULAR MEETING - OCTOBER 3, 2001
PAGE 2 OF 10
.:..:. AGENDA NOTE: THE FOLLOWING REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
WERE DISCUSSED AS DOCUMENTED. .:. .:.
III. REGULAR
REGULAR
B. Oviedo Marketplace, Parcel 14 Rezoning.
The Agenda Item was presented by Mr. Earnest McDonald, AICP, Advance Planning
Coordinator, Community Development Department. Mr. McDonald stated, "The request
is consistent with the recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan as well as the Future
Use Land Map Amendment approved by both this body and the City Commission. The
Development Review Committee had an opportunity to review this Preliminary
Development Plan and recommends approval with the following conditions. Those
conditions are as follows: that parking by trucks, tractor truck or similar larger
commercial vehicles be limited to seventy-two (72) hours on site; that outdoor sales not
be permitted in parking areas; and lastly that the sales of goods and lor of services from
semi-trucks trailers or similar equipment be prohibited." Discussion.
The Board discussed the responsibility of emergency response.
Chairman Fernandez said, "My recommendation at least, whether it's in the minutes or
not, should be that the City Attorney ought to look over these Interlocal Agreements to
see what our exposure is and if we have any exposure to make sure we've got enough
adequate insurance to cover it and that of course there's something in those agreements
that says when they're in the City of Winter Springs and one of our representatives shows
up, that they've got to listen to us and they've got to take their orders from us. Because I
want their policemen and their safety employees and who ever else it is - listening to our
guys. And if we make a mistake we're responsible for it, but if they make a mistake and
they are going against what we want, then let their insurance pick it up. In any event I
think it's an issue that should be brought up and it's a legal issue and I think that ought to
be addressed to the City Attorney or our City Attorneys as to those agreements and if it
has not been previously addressed then it has to been addressed."
Discussion ensued regarding City limit signs; and the Large Scale Plan Amendment.
Tape I/Side B
Ms. Carrie Hayo. Planner, 33 East Pine Street, Orlando, Florida: addressed the Board's
concerns.
Vice Chairman Brown stated, "I would like - there's no more than twelve (12) homes
that are actually on the property if it's that many, I'd like the City to consider notifying
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
REGULAR MEETING - OCTOBER 3, 2001
PAGE 3 OF 10
those twelve (12) people, twelve (12) homes. I don't think that's such a big thing to do
when we're going to proceed with this because I'm certainly going to be looking for
buffers and things of that sort no matter what's going in there unless it was going to be
residential. "
Ms. Mayo spoke of having notified all adjacent property owners and Tuscawilla
Homeowner's Associations of a Special Meeting regarding the development and no one
attended. Vice Chairman Brown requested that the homeowners be notified in the future
"When you do know who is going to build."
MOTION BY VICE CHAIRMAN BROWN. "MR. CHAIRMAN, I'D LIKE TO
MAKE A MOTION. BASED ON THE STAFF REPORT OF OCTOBER 3RD 2001
ON THE OVIEDO MARKETPLACE REZONING, THAT WE RECOMMEND
TO THE CITY COMMISSION APPROVAL BASED ON THE FINDINGS
WHICH IS ITEM III. UNDER THIS REPORT AND THE STAFF
RECOMMENDATION THAT THE REQUEST TO CHANGE THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION FOR PARCEL 14 OF THE OVIEDO MARKETPLACE DRI
FROM SEMINOLE COUNTY PUD TO WINTER SPRINGS PUD."
CHAIRMAN FERNANDEZ ASKED, "SO YOUR MOTION IS BASED ON
THOSE FINDINGS THAT WE RECOMMEND TO THE CITY
COMMISSION..." "RIGHT, TO THE STAFF REPORT, YES SIR." WAS SAID
BY VICE CHAIRMAN BROWN. CHAIRMAN FERNANDEZ CONTINUED,
"ARE THERE ANY ADDITIONAL LIMITATIONS THAT YOU WISH TO ADD
TO THAT MOTION?"
BOARD MEMBER GREGORY SAID, "POINT OF CLARIFICATION. ARE
YOU INCLUDING THE THREE (3) RECOMMENDATIONS THAT EARNEST
MADE?"
VICE CHAIRMAN REPLIED, "I WOULD REQUEST THAT THEY WOULD BE
ADDED TO THE FINDINGS ALSO. THAT THE FINDINGS AND YOUR
RECOMMENDATION AS STATED, I LEFT OUT ALL THIS ZONING THING.
IT'S UNDERSTANDABLE WITHOUT THE APPROVAL, I'M NOT GOING TO
MAKE ALL OF THAT PART OF THE MOTION, BUT THAT WILL BE PART
OF THE MOTION. IN OTHER WORDS, ITEM III., THE FINDINGS PLUS THE
OTHER ITEMS THAT YOU BROUGHT UP AND OF COURSE - THIS WON'T
COME BACK TO US - IF DCA HAVE OTHER CHANGES, RIGHT? SHE [MS.
MAYO] MENTIONED THAT THERE'D BE SOME OTHER POSSIBLE
CHANGES. I DON'T THINK THAT'S NECESSARY ON MY MOTION. MY
MOTION IS THESE FINDINGS PLUS YOUR STATEMENTS THIS EVENING
AND I RECOMMEND NUMBER IV. WHICH IS THE STAFF
RECOMMENDATION WITHOUT TALKING ABOUT ALL THIS STUFF HERE
AND THEN JUST GOING INTO THE APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST THAT
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
REGULAR MEETING - OCTOBER 3. 2001
PAGE 4 OF 10
THEY CHANGE THE ZONING FOR THE PARCEL." SECONDED BY BOARD
MEMBER GREGORY. DISCUSSION.
CHAIRMAN FERNANDEZ REITERATED, "I BELIEVE THE MOTION IS
THAT BASED ON THE STAFF'S FINDINGS UNDER ROMAN NUMERAL III. -
ON PAGE FIVE (5) THAT THIS BODY IS RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY
COMMISSION THAT WE APPROVE THE CHANGE OF ZONING FROM THE
COUNTY ZONING OF, SEMINOLE COUNTY PUD, TO WINTER SPRINGS
PUD WITH LIMITATION OF NO PARKING BY TRUCKS, TRACTORS OR
OTHER SIMILAR COMMERCIAL VEHICLES, THAT IT BE LIMITED - NOT
NO PARKING BUT THOSE VEHICLES BE LIMITED TO SEVENTY-TWO (72)
HOURS ON SITE; THAT OUTDOOR SALES NOT BE PERMITTED IN
VEHICLES IN ACCOMMODATION AREAS, AND THAT THE SALES OF
GOODS AND/OR OF SERVICES FROM TRUCKS, TRAILERS OR OTHER
COMMERCIAL VEHICLES SHALL BE PROHIBITED. IS THAT MY
UNDERSTANDING OF THE MOTION MR. BROWN?"
"EXACTL Y." REPLIED VICE CHAIRMAN BROWN. CHAIRMAN
FERNANDEZ ASKED, "IS THAT MY UNDERSTANDING OF YOUR SECOND
MR. GREGORY?" "YES." REPLIED BOARD MEMBER GREGORY.
CHAIRMAN FERNANDEZ CONTINUED, "DO YOU HAVE ANY DESIRE TO
ADD OR AMEND TO IT THAT WHEN THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING
PLANS FOR THE PUD OR SUBDIVISION PLANS COME IN THAT THE STAFF
BRING TO US ANY - WHAT IS THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS POLICY AS
IT RELATES TO THE PLACEMENT OF 'CITY LIMIT SIGNS AND AS TO THE
CITY LOOKING INTO ANY LIABILITY FOR - BORROWED EMPLOYEES OF
THE CITY OF OVIEDO OR SEMINOLE COUNTY ON A FIRST RESPONSE
BASIS?"
VICE CHAIRMAN BROWN SAID, "NO, I ASSUME THE CITY WILL BE ABLE
TO HANDLE IT." CHAIRMAN FERNANDEZ SAID, "HE [MR. McDONALD]
SAID HE WOULDN'T UNLESS WE REQUESTED IT. OKAY."
VOTE:
BOARD MEMBER STEPHENS: AYE
BOARD MEMBER GREGORY: AYE
CITY OF WINTER SPRlNGS
MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
REGULAR MEETING - OCTOBER 3, 2001
PAGE 5 OF 10
VICE CHAIRMAN BROWN: AYE
CHAIRMAN FERNANDEZ: AYE
BOARD MEMBER KARR: AYE
MOTION CARRIED.
REGULAR
A. Torcaso Park (As Presented By The Parks And Recreation Department).
Mr. Chuck Pula, Parks and Recreation Department Director introduced the Agenda Item.
The Board and Mr. Pula discussed the splash playground; the various types of surfaces
under playgrounds; the construction of the soccer/football; and the water supply for the
splash playground.
MOTION BY BOARD MEMBERS STEPHENS. "I RECOMMEND THAT WE
APPROVE THE TORCASO PARK EXPANSION PROJECT TO COINCIDE
WITH THE FRDAP (FLORIDA RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
ASSISTANCE PROGRAM) GRANT APPLICATION." SECONDED BY VICE
CHAIRMAN BROWN. DISCUSSION.
VOTE:
BOARD MEMBER GREGORY: AYE
BOARD MEMBER BROWN : AYE
VICE CHAIRMAN FERNANDEZ: AYE
CHAIRPERSON MEMBER KARR: AYE
BOARD MEMBER STEPHENS: AYE
MOTION CARRIED.
REGULAR
B. Capital Improvements.
Mr. Charles Carrington, AlCP, Community Development Department Director
introduced the Agenda Item. Mr. Carrington informed the Board that Land Design
Innovations, Inc. (with all Departments) prepared the "Draft Document". Discussion.
Tape 21Side A
Mr. Pula requested that the following corrections be made:
Page VI-l
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
REGULAR MEETING - OCTOBER 3, 2001
PAGE 6 OF 10
. On the line of "Neighborhood Center and Pool" remove the word "Pool" and the fund
source should be CDBG/FRDAP (Community Development Block Grant! Florida
Recreational Development Assistance Program) For $700,000.00 In The FY 2004-
2005.
· Under CWP and Improvements (the first one) under FY 2001-2002, $250,000.00
should be listed and under FY 2003-2004 the $2,500,000.00 should be moved to FY
2005-2006.
· The second CWP and Improvements Bonds the word "Bonds" should be replaced
with "Grants"; in the FY 2002-2003 column put $200,000.002; in the FY 2003-2004
column put $400,000.00; and delete $2,500,000.00 under FY 2004-2005.
· "Park Land Acquisition" should be "Park Land Acquisition/CWP Expansion and
Improvements"; under Fund Source eliminate the word Grants; in the FY 2001-2002
column submit $2,950,000.00; and eliminate $1,000,000.00 under FY 2005-2006.
. Change the Senior/Civic Center Improvements' amount to $500,000.00; and remove
the words FRDAP Grant.
· On the Torcaso Park Expansion line, remove FRDAP Grant and change $400,000.00
to $485,000.00.
. Mr. Pula stated, "Then again these changes would be made also on Page VI-9 where
it's basically it's a duplicate, but breaks it out into Bonds and Grants so it would still
be the same changes. There wouldn't be any other changes other than what you have
made. "
Mr. Pula departed at 8:53 p.m.
Mr. Kipton D. Lockcuff, P.E., Public Works Department Director said, "A lot of these
changes are just to accurately reflect the Budget that was adopted last Monday night."
. On Page VI-9, Transportation Impact Fee Fund all project should begin with 02 and
not 01: and S.R. 419/434 Signal Upgrades change $175,000.00 to $215,000.00.
. On page VI-lO the first project numbers should begin with "02 and not 01"; Bahama
Road Paving project number should begin with "03 and not 02": and under One Cent
Infrastructure Sales Tax, Fisher Road should be stricken and reinserted under Main
Street in Transportation and the projected cost should be changed to $600,000.00.
Discussion.
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
REGULAR MEETING - OCTOBER 3, 2001
PAGE 7 OF 10
· Mr. Lockcuff recommended that Tractor/Bushhog under Local Gas Tax be completely
removed; that with the removal of Tractor/Bushhog the following project numbers
would change; and George Street's project number should be 02/06-0104-08.
. Under One Cent Infrastructure Sales Tax, "Stamped Asphalt" should be removed.
. The project number for Little Lake Howell RCP Culvert should begin with "03" and
the $30,000.00 would be moved to the FY 2003-2004 column.
· On Page VI-II, Little Lake Howell Box Culvert, the $126,000.00 should be under FY
2002-2003.
· Gee Creek Sedimentation Pond should begin "04" and the $122,000.00 will shift to
FY 2003-2004.
· Mr. Lockcuff recommended that since the first two projects under Potable Water have
been completed that they be removed.
. On Page VI-12 the first project (Install Liner in Reject Storage Pond at WWRF)
should be removed because of completion.
. Reclaimed Water System - Convert Meter will become a "03" project, therefore shift
$210,000.00 to FY 2002-2003.
. Under Equipment, the "Sewer Cleaner", remove $100,000.00.
. On the Backhoe/Front Loader line, remove all of the $18,333.00.
. On Page VI-13 remove the whole FY 2000-2001 column.
. The Pump Replacement and Hydrant/Valve Replacement project numbers should
begin with "03".
. Under the Utility 2000 Construction Fund, the first 434 project should be stricken
completely
. The West Town Center Gravity Sewer Extension is now a FY 2001-2002 project.
. The Lift Station 5E upgrade becomes an "03" project and instead of the cost being
$150,000.00 it will be $50,000.00 in the FY 2002-2003 column.
. $450,000.00 should be $250,000.00 under project WTP #1 Main to Tuskawilla Road-
16"/12".
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
REGULAR MEETING - OCTOBER 3, 2001
PAGE 8 OF 10
· The Lift Station Upgrades to Force Main project needs to be deleted.
. On Page VI-14 the Reclaimed Water Augmentation Pump Station's figure should be
$500,000.00; under the Utility 1997 Construction Fund the first project should be
stricken; and the Utility Operations Facility should be listed as a FY 2001-2002
project.
Discussion.
MOTION BY VICE CHAIRMAN BROWN. "I'D LIKE TO MAKE A
RECOMMENDATION THAT WE APPROVE THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
PROGRAM WITH THE CHANGES TO THE COMMISSION." SECONDED BY
BOARD MEMBER GREGORY. DISCUSSION.
Vice Chairman Tom Brown requested that each Board Member receive updated pages of
the Capital Improvements when available.
Chairman Fernandez asked, "Is it part of our function - for example under the Police
Budget under on Roman numeral VI-2 he's got two (2) Items here 'Headquarter
Expansion' and 'Vehicle Replacement'. I personally happen to like those little radar
things that they set out on the road that turn red when you go over the speed limit and so
on. I think the City's got at least one (1) but I'm not sure that they have more, they've got
just the one, that's what I thought. And we've got at least the east half of the city and the
west half of the City and it can't be in two places at once. Is it appropriate for us as a
Board to be, through you [Mr. Carrrington] I guess suggesting that maybe the Police
Department consider getting more of those radar units?" Mr. Carrington replied, "I think
your comment was exactly on target to consider. Make that part of your Motion if you
would, that the Commission considers adding to the Capital Improvements Program
either during the year 2001-2002 or 2002-2003. We won't make that change but I'll
make sure that is part of the recommendation to the City Commission for consideration
and ifthey elect to put it in whatever year and then we'll make that adaptation."
CHAIRMAN FERNANDEZ ASKED, "MR. BROWN MADE THE MOTION
WOULD YOU CONSIDER THAT AMENDMENT." VICE CHAIRMAN BROWN
SAID, "I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH THAT." AMENDMENT BY VICE
CHAIRMAN BROWN. SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER GREGORY.
DISCUSSION.
CHAIRMAN FERNANDEZ SAID, "THE MOTION HAS BEEN AMENDED TO
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 2001-2006 INCLUDING A
RECOMMENDATION THAT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT AT SOMEWHERE
IN THAT FIVE (5) YEAR PERIOD CONSIDER ADDING RADAR TRAFFIC
TRAILERS."
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
REGULAR MEETING - OCTOBER 3, 2001
PAGE 9 OF 10
VOTE: (ON THE AMENDMENT)
BOARD MEMBER BROWN: AYE
VICE CHAIRMAN FERNANDEZ: AYE
CHAIRPERSON MEMBER KARR: AYE
BOARD MEMBER STEPHENS: AYE
BOARD MEMBER GREGORY: AYE
MOTION CARRIED.
VOTE: (ON THE MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED)
VICE CHAIRMAN FERNANDEZ: AYE
CHAIRPERSON MEMBER KARR: AYE
BOARD MEMBER STEPHENS: AYE
BOARD MEMBER GREGORY: AYE
BOARD MEMBER BROWN: AYE
MOTION CARRIED.
IV. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
This Item was not discussed.
V. REPORTS
Chairman Fernandez presented a plaque to Board Member Karr for chairing the Board
over the past year.
VI. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER STEPHENS. "MOVE TO ADJOURN."
SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER GREGORY. DISCUSSION. WITH
CONSENSUS OF THE BOARD THE MOTION WAS APPROVED.
MOTION CARRIED.
Tape 2/Side B
Chairman Fernandez adjourned the Meeting at 9:20 p.m.
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
REGULAR MEETING - OCTOBER 3, 2001
PAGE 10 OF 10
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:
DEBBIE GILLESPIE
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
APPROVED:
BILL FERNANDEZ, CHAIRMAN
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
Docs\ W ord\BOARDS\PLA NNING\aJl]\M INUTES\200 1 \ 100301 REGULA R.doc
NOTE: These minutes were approved at the
,200 I Planning And Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency Meeting.
I
5
13
9
12
10
11
.~
oviedomarketplace PUD
H
Parcel 14
City of Winter Springs, Florida
G G
Client Legal Counsel Location Map
The Viera Company Lowndes Drosdick Doster Kantor & Reed
7380 Murrell Road, Suite 201 215 North Eola Drive
Viera, Florida 32940 P. O. Box 2809
1-321-242-1200 Local: 407-365-2015 Orlando, Florida 32801
FAX: l-321-253-1800 Phone: 407-843-4600
Attn: Tom Babcock FAX: 407-423-4495
Mary Ellen McKibben Attn: Hal Kantor, Esquire
Steve Johnson Terri Ammon (Asst) E
E Pat Rinka, Esquire
Planner/Proiect Manager
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Engineer
Lopez, Rinehart, Inc. Professional Engineering Consultants, Inc.
33 East Pine Street 200 East Robinson Street, Suite 1560 D
D
Orlando, Florida 32801 Orlando, Florida 32801 u
Phone: 407-843-6552 Phone: 407-422-8062
FAX: 407-839-1789 Fax: 407-849-9401
Attn: Jack Glatting - Principal in Charge Attn: Rick Merkel
c Carey Hayo - Project Manager Winnie Sear c
Julie Ping (Asst)
John Moore - Transportation Planner sale ~ Mk3 M2Rft 2001 Jib"lIl
Christi Elflein - Planner ~--~ @
, '" 7
B B
I
; -
I
I Master Plan
A A
L 9 10 11 12 13
I
[C
GLATTING
JACKSON
KERCHER
ANGLIN
LOPEZ
RINEHART
33 But PiDc s_
0rIaad0, fL 32801
P: 4Ir11143 6552
P: 4Ir1839 1789
H
Q ro
"d
;:J -;:::::
0
~ G:
(j) rJ)
U bI)
~ c
- -c
0.;0-
~C/) ~
(j) l- ei)
>
~~ 0
;.... -- u
~~
84-.
o ~
" ~
U
G>>
.-
>
0
"""""'NO. IS7l1ll
""""'ED", CSH
"""""' JMM
CHfCIm "' cae
""" 09.10.01
ESLEOFOFl:
"_..
00""'"'''''1.'
"""""Tm.E
EXHIIIT NUMBER
1
~ 1 <F 12
~
I
U hh ~Hii~
~ H~d~ m~
I
L-
UOlldJ.J:>sea !1!liiYJ
llPllO[.j 'S3UlldS l:ljU!M JO .\)1:)
and ~:)Uldl~:>[lUUIOpa!^O
UU~
- i
I" I 'I
ilild
I
~
I C\J ~
i
>< ""
Ii! 0 Z
l<l :t <
!;; t; in
~~J
5 ;:l ~
l<l 0 i5 ""
> tIl 0
< Z ~ l<l
~ ;:l < ~
o l:l:: " Z
U l<l Z <
l<l U >
~ ~ ~ ~
U .. ~ ~
;; ~ ~ ~
E-< l<l U <
tl !;; S !;i
~ ~ ~ l<l
N :t " ""
N 5 ~ :5
g 0 ....l 0
N tIl < ~
~
tIl
~ fj b
E In ~ ~
.... ~ r:: 0
~ !" to ~
~ lB :!: ::l
l<l:t~:t
l<l E-< tIl E-<
"" ;:lo ~ l:l::
Ii: tIl == 0
N CD Z
~ fj ~ 0
o l<l M :(
!;; "" i-- tIl
~ :c 00 "
== iii :t ~
<:, ... bJ l:l::
..... ~ 0 <
~ ~ z ~
<0 == ~ 0
00 :.. ~ w
:t ..... "" U
E-< M CD Z
;:l M N l<l
o i-- ..... :t
tIl 00 N E-<
z
o
E=
Ilo
.....
0::
u
CIl
~
Q
....l
<C
()
~
....l
o
l<l
c:l
12
U
tIl
l<l
r-.: 0
... E-<
Z tIl
o ~
E=:
U .....
l<l M
tIl tS
~ ~
~ :to
....l 5
o 0
j ~
"" N Vi
o e: ~
t) ~ ::3
~ ~ ~
< E-< <
""
o
~ ~ 0,
" ;:l M
Z 0 '"
~ tIl ?
~ lj ~
o " :t
5 ~ 8
< ~ tIl
~ c:l Z
~ &2 ~
"" 0 l<l
;:: :t !i
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ !;i ~
~ l<l ,
l<l "" ;
....l :G N
U iii ...
l:l:: ..... II'l
< M ...
~ [5
~ ~
~ ! ~
o 0 i5
U tIl <
.~ l:l::
~ l:l:: <
;:l l<l "
U U Z
< Z ~
o ~ :I:
E-< E-<
E-< .0 ~
l<l ><~ l:l::
l<l ;:l
"" U
~ tIl S
II'l < <
~ l<l tIl
o :t "
E-< E-< Z
~ 5 9
== tIl <
""
o
Z :t :t !;;
< t; 5 ~
In Z 0 :t
M l<l tIl E-<
Co ....l "" l:l::
... 0 00""
~ l:l:: " Z 0
"" 0 Z 0 !Z:
~ 5 ~ :( 0
a ~ c:l ~ ~
~ tz &2 0 ~
~ "" 0 ~ 0
~ ; ~ ~ ~
l<l N ~ 0 .....
U "" E-< E-<
< 0 E-< 0
.:t~12~,,;
~ t; l<l == 0 Z
l<l Z l<l N l:l:: ....z
"" l<l "" N l<l
:5 ....l ro- in Z Z
O. U "! ..... 0:: G
Ii: ~ ~ ~ 8 ~
N
.....
!;i :t
~ < ~ ~ ~ ~
l<l 0 Z tIl :5 l<l ....
:t E-< ;:l " 0 ....l 0
E-< L... l:l:: Z II'l U :!:
W l<l 0 ro- l:l::
~ l<l ~ ~ "" < [5
~ ~ gj ~ ~ ~ ~
; ~ ~ ~ t:J ~ t:J
ai 00 >< ... Z II'l Z
N ... ; e l<l Co l<l
E-< Iii .... .... ....l ... ....l
~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ lj 5
~ ~ Z ~ < ~ <
~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
:t :t ~ ~ ~ ~ ""
~ ~ 8 Ii! :t ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ tz ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;:
l:l:: l:l:: U == U < 0
E-< 0
.0 E-<
....l "
"" Z
~ ~
l<l 0
~ ~
o <
~ ~
~ !}j
:t ~
bJ ll.
o '
Z "
l<l ~
:t tIl
E-< ~
~ l:l::
l<l U
U as
~ ~
o N
U .....
~
o E-<
o Z
c:l ....
E-< U ~
;S ::l l<l
ll. c:l :I:
~ ~ E-<
tIl
o l<l <
~ ~ ~
o [5 Z
U M 5
gj 00 U
o l<l
~ ~ s
"" N Z
o 00 ~
gj ... l<l
l<l 00 tIl
:t 0 ""
E-< 00 0
S !2 ~
ll. ~ ~
l<l ll. U
~ ~ gj
E-<
" 0 :I:
Z ....l 5
~ ~ 0
::3 tIl tIl
o "" fj
"" ~ l<l
l<l Z ""
~ ::l ~
Z :I: ~
~ ~ ~
l<l 0 tIl
U Z ~
~ ~ ~
~." ~
t5 ~ :"
Z ....l N
.... < ro-
~ tIl :t
G gj bJ
l<l Ill; 0
c:l ;:l Z
"" 0 N
o U .....
~ 0
~ :;l ;S tIl
~ ;: ..J <
~ E-<' ~ ;:
~ ~ tIl ffi
o ..... ~ :t
Z 0 "" E-<
lj ~ ~ s
" ... ~ ll.
~ ~ ~ ~
c:l ~ l<l g
~ ~ ~ ~
5 : ~ ~
< ~ gj 8
o gj E-< U
Z E-< 0 <
< E-< r-.:
!;i ~ ~ ~
l<l ~ l<l Z
"" == "" ;:l
~
tIl
~
<:, ~
M l<l
<:> l<l
II'l ~
M 00
II'l iii
:t N
E-< ~
;:l tIl
5l ~
fj fg
l<l Co
"" 0
o <0
N .....
~ ~
~ ~
N l<l
..... l<l
in ""
o 00
M N
CD ....
~
CD
o M
~ ;;
N
~ ~ fj
;:l ~ l<l
5l w ""
fj ~ :
tIJ ~ N
"" i-- ~
~ ..... (/)
~ ~ ~
E-<tIl 0 :G .....
tIl . Ol
~ ,. ~ N
;;; ffi fJ ~
. "" :t tIl
13 ~ 5 ~
~ ~ 0 N
~ ~ ~ ~
;:l tIl ~ M
o ~ l<l II'l
tIl == "" CD
~
tIl tIl
~ ~
~ ~
< 0
....l U
"" 0
o Z
E-< <
~ ~ ~
o 0 l:l::
~ Ii 0
B g ~
tIl ;:l ~
~ 0 vi
U ~
~ l<l l:l::
g S ~
< Z .....
l<l ~ :g
~ !}j ~
""
o ><
~ ~ gj
Z ~ ~ ~
< 0 ;:l
~ U 0
tIl l<l tIl 5l
tS s gj r-.:
< Z E-< !::
ll. ~ "z
~ ~ ~ ;:l
~ "" ....l <
o 0 < ::3
~ ~ ~ ~
~ 8 ~ ~
Z gj ~ E-<
.... U :t S
!il ::l E:': ~
o ~ < ""
~ ll. ~ 0
~ gj 9 ~
l:l:: E-< "" ....l
E-<
~ ~
o
tIl
Iii fj
~ ~
~ 8
II'l ,.;
;... II'l
~ Iii
; ~
5 :..
o .....
tIl Co
.. N
~ ;..
l<l 0
"" ~
~ ;:l
ai 0
... tIl
E-<
tIl
< ~
gj ;:l
E-< 0
5 tIl
tIl Z
l<l ;:l
:t l:l::
E-< l<l
o U
E-< Z
tl gj
l<l E-<
"" ..
c;l j
.... ll.
18 S
~ ~
~ [5
'" l:l::
N l<l
<:> Z
? l:l::
o 0
ro- U
~ ~ ~ ~ !il ~
tIl tIl tIl Z tIl Z
Z Z zoo ;:l
;:l ;:l ;:l L... ll.o l:l::
l:l:: l:l:: l:l:: r l<l
l<l l<l l<l ~ l:l:: U
U U U 0 ll. Z
Z Z Z ll. l<l l<l
l<l l<l l<l < ~ ~
~ ~ ~ g "" I1J
~ ~ ~ E-< 0 U
l<l l<l l<l l<l >< ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ iil
:::: ~ en ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Iii Iii Iii Iii ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
N 0 Ol 0 l:l:: 0
~~~b~~~
OMtv') N s:
~ ~ ~ ~ 0
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ;:l
M ~ 5l
~ ~ fj
~ ~ ~
o ~ to""4
tIl N ro-
... (') ui
~ ;.. :
l<l ... r
~ ~ ~
to 0 00
N tIl 0
~ ~ ;"
~ ~ ~
~
tIl
< ~
l<l l<l
1:; ~
'" .....
;" 0
o ,.;
N M
l<l
:I: ~
E-< tIl
~ ~
>< ~
~ ~
~ II'l
o II'l
~ ~
" ;:l
12 5l
E-< ..
tIl !2
~ lQ
o ;:l
!}j 8
o "
ll. Z
~ ~
ll. 0
S ::3
< 0
tIl ""
Iii
~ ~
In ~
:t M ""
E-< ;., Ol
;:l ..... 0
o M ai
tIl 00 N
Iii fj ~ ~
~ ~ 5 ~
II'l tIl
~ :2 ~. ~
[... M ~ ~
:" ~ "" M
:!: ~ ~ CIO
~ ~ ~ ~
o ... ~ 0
tIl <0 tIl Z
fj ~ ~ fj
~ ~ g ~
o M CD
M N ~
00(" .....
II'l tIl CD M
~
I
L
13
D
Luthern
H~v_en
3
10
11
I I
,[I
GLATTING
JACKSON
KERCHER
ANGLIN
LOPEZ
I RINEHART
33 EastPlDoS_
0rIalld0, PI. 32801
P: 407 843 6552
P: 407 839 1789
O~
- ~'5
~G:
CI) r.rJ
G () OJ)
cj .::: Cl.
~ ;..... ~
.&~:g
CI) ~ ~
~ 1:: .5
_ ..... U
F S ~ ;>
o ~
" .-:::
a>>u
I-
E >
o
~NO. 15798
!JESG<El) BY CSH
iFA'MIl BY .lMU
CHfO<H) BY cae
D "'''' 09.10.0.1
lSSl..EOFtlR:
--
c
"""""SC'I..E
CLr1(lJ
""""".".
EXHIIIT NUMBER
3
5H'Er 3 CF 11
~
G
G
Site
F Parcel 14
Residential Currently Vacant
(City of
Winter Springs)
E
E
I
9
10
H
Residential
o
c
B
A
L
9
10
11
12
I
,[I
13
GLATTING
JACKSON
KERCHER
ANGLIN
LOPEZ
RINEHART
(City of Oviedo)
33 East PlDo s_
0rIalld0, PI. 32801
P: 407 843 6552
P: 407 839 1789
H
0
~ ro
~ '"0 C
..... ....
;..... c
CI) 0 0
() G: N
cj r.rJ 't:l
~ OJ) ~
C.::: Q)
CI) ;..... {/l
~~ ~
H ;..... 't:l
cj (1) ~
......
S c ....:l
.....
0 ~ C
<+- ....
" .....
0 {/l
....
a>> >-, ~
...... ~
1- U
>
0
F'RO..II:T"". 15lH
!JESG<El)BY CSH
""""BY JIlM
<><",""BY cae
"'''' 09.10.0.1
6SlEO "'"'
"_..
"""""SC'I..E ,......
ruJ rn
OFf so 11Xl North
""""".".
EXHIBIT N~BEA
4
5H'Er 4 CF 12
00
00
Retail/Office
o
(Seminole County)
c
Zoning Legend:
c=J PUD Planned Unit Development
c=J R - 1AM Single Family (13,500 sq. ft. lot size)
c=J R - 1A Single Family (9,000 sq.-ft lot size)
I Site Boundary - Parcel 14
. Existing land use noted in text on map
B
A
11
12
13
~
I
11
12 13
oviedomarketplace
5V
E
3i5
B
Q)
>
.-
'-
o
~
"""'"
~
-:0
~11
35
I
.
I
i
!A
I
45
I.~. ~ 100 Year Floodplain (none on map)
/4CU Topography (ft)
Site Boundary - Parcel 14
Source: SJRWMD
L
2
12
13
9
10
11
I "I
,[I
GLATTING
_ JACKSON
KERCHER
ANGLIN
LOPEZ
I RINEHART
33 East Plno s_
0rIalld0, PI. 32801
P: 407 843 6552
P: 407 839 1789
H
0
~ ro
~ '"0
0;::
CI) 0
...-
() ~
cj r.rJ~
~ OJ)
C.:::
CI) ;.....
~~
H ;.....
cj (1)
......
S c
.....
0 ~
<+-
" 0
CI>> >-,
......
1- U
>
0
F'RO..II:T"". 15796
!JESG<El)BY CSH
"""""'BY JllII
CHfO<H) BY CllE
"'''' 09.10..0.1
6SlEO FOR
"-
"""""SC'I..E ,......
rUI rn
OFT .. 100 .....
"""""".".
EXH1BrT NIAilBER
5
5H'Er 5 CF 12
c
...
~
-a
't:l
o
o
.....
~
'"'
~
Q)
>-
o
o
....t
F
't:l
C
~
E
Cl.
~
00
o
Cl.
o
E--
o
B
I
A
~
I
_,
J .
/
/' ~ .
H
--
/
G._~
-.---"
-L
,....
F
I
"'
//' .
'.
')("
.\
/'
.,/
I
/
..-
,/"
,.'
...
./'
/
,.
. .;.....'.J""'/
'.,/".r
~- ----;
o
-------.
c
_.-..---1
5
...
,
,.
,..,,'
.;
'.
/
.-
/
",
,.
.- '----
"
.'
,'.
--.......
..'
.'
"
...
.'-----.
--
"
.,'
"...."'\. .......
.'\
.'
. ".....-
.,r
,.
/'
....'
./
.,/'
.-'"
/'
,,-'
A ./
....__/'..
....
...~
/'
...'"
,.'
~/'..
,---'
/
,./
...;.....
----
-',
" 1
" "
//~/
':
---I
'-----i
~I-:,
\
~,,_..
...---' .-
--
-.......-:
-.'
--.
,
,.r-'
, ,
./
./
/\\
// '
...---'
...--- :
---
.........
,
~-..,
, .;,-
I' - ,~..
. y-~ ........~'--'---
......--- ,./ '.
..'
, ~~
- -~____" I
'.......... .........,
............. '-----.
...,
........... --",
-'---'~ .
..l
\.~/
B
.
I ........ /--........ '"
Ii,.- ,
I ....
I
A, __
..\
)/
.<
\,
A
./
-,-
'.
':...........
>-.;....
.--.....
" , i ,.>..
, - ----i. ' -...;......-
.~------ .
",
\
,
..,
""
'...........
.......,"- ~
, ' /
........... .........-i... ' I \ . I ....-
'~............~. '___l-- //---..
"""-, ----~ ~ ,"" "
'~~ ~
'--.. ---..---~
''\.........-t".~.
-~.
.'
1---""
.-..-,,'
"
'\\
~...--
..---,...
_0"-\
...-
,,-.../.1'...
_/i
'.........
"'t
....
""-~
--------.
L
\/...'
,..1
..-
.-
~.
....
./'
,,/
5
6
9
''"'
\....."
""',
"
\
242
Site
Parcel 14
.~_/
". .
617
427
f'.
\
I \
..J
242
:"
'--"'_--,1
/
I '1
"
!
,
617
1
\
...
I
,
1
,
.\
,/ '
"
\
\
6
9
..;
10
.~
;
J
-------....i-~
10
11
12
13
-'
"
A
/ ."
//'
, .'
....-/
_.,/:/~
.,/"_. -.
.J..i ;..J
~ ;~
~-~:.....I
---
'......
/ ...------.,
I
\\
.-"
\
,
-.
-..........
"
~.
.~
.----
o
,/
",
"
-...............,.,
,,---- -"'"-,..,
........
.~.
__j-.l--~
~.....-
-----'
242 Sod Farm (Inactive)
617 Mixed Wetland Hardwbods
I
I ~~_
-
Site Boundary - Parcel 14
Source: Oviedo Crossing DR)
11
----'-
1
13
12
"
1
../
"I
[I
GLATTING
JACKSON
KERCHER
ANGLIN
LOPEZ
RINEHART
33 East Plno s_
0rIalld0, PI. 32801
P: 407 843 6552
P: 407 839 1789
H
0
~ ro
~ '"0
'C
CI) 0 '"'
...-
() ~ Q)
>
cj ~ 0
r.rJ
~ OJ)
,fr C 't:l
-c C
CI) P-
~ if)
l-
cj (1)
......
S C 't:l
.;- C
0 ~ ~
<+- ....:l
" 0
CI>> >-.
......
1- U
>
0
F'RO..II:T"". ISlH
!JESG<El)BY CSH
""""BY ./My
Q-o:EQS) fJ'( CllE
"'''' 09.10.0.1
ESlED fUR;
"_..
"""""SC'I..E ,......
ruJ rn
OFT .. 100 .....
""""".".
EXHIIIT NlJM8fA
6
5H'Er 6 CF 12
....
...,
G
u
F
~
Q)
{/l
~
E
o
c
!
B
,J
A
.J
J .
,.
H
G-.
-'-'
I
L
, .
F
I
....
"
...
" ..,/.
'.~( /J,
.'
.'
..r'
./.
/
,.
.,'
"
~-'. /-
. r
,./
--j
o
\---'
,__-i
c
_-I
-"
.-/
.,
./
.-
.....~....".
;'
. ,..'
....
"
," -'
._/ f*
/'
/
.'
..'
. .
, .
.-'
....".'.
,/
"
..
/'
./
'"
~-~.
...
,.
~.
.....\
,,'
,...-
...'
,.../' .,/~.J'-
"
....,..-
...."."..
",'\
. ,
---
"___~
~ .------'
'---.'-
...
....."\
/"
.--
B
.'
...'
... -....
,.. '.
" .........-......
.:--....
"-
'....,
'"
..
~:
,../",,'"
9
12
13
10
11
........-
----
..-'
."
...
//
,,-
/>
.///"
/',/
-~~/
J.J. J,.l--'
.r ....4....
~ ,
...l-'
...l~
" .~
~ "
,~~..J.....J....l'"
-PmB---
-"
"'-..
<"
'.
----
---,
-~
,--'
....."-----
.'
I~,"
/
i
,
J
....
."'--...........~_......
_.--;
---j
,/
..!
...........
, _..--4 ~........ ",---'
- ,\ .....--/
I .~.
./
-'
"
-_:\
r
~
, ,
',.-;
../"+
./
,/
,.-
,.
/
..--'
;~_ I
.....-
,.
'--...
,.. -~..,
..-
...l' ....
. ~- ~---;==-
___--.-' /r' . . \.
/'
,.'
'-'
---/
Osw-
I~:~~~.J Rf -
Dlm-
-~ LdC -
= pmS -
o LfA-
Lakewood Sand
Pomello Fine Sand
.'
'j
...
..........
'--.. ....,-~.
..........."......... ,;"".................
. ~-~
.....
.'",..,....
../~\'.
--~....- ..,........,....
----------.
."
Swamp
Rutlege Fine Sand
Immokalee Fine Sand
../'\ ,
,.
..,/
'.
\
~
"
/
"
../\
..
.....
,
.....-;,.:
'.
".;-.:.,;" ----"
, .---~ "'-"
./ '
.-.....r.. ;--,
'..."
.,'............
>- ,.............
---- .
~ -.....--
-........ -~
........-'---- -,,-
. -- -------
A, . "'"''
...." ..........
......
-'-......
..................
L
./
""
Leon Fine_Sand.
-~
--
Site Boundary - Parcel 14
Source: SJRWMD
..\ ..-
'v--
---<-------- "
"
./'--"........
..--<'
).
_/-~
'/'
\
\
\
"
....--.:
,..,-
,
..
.......\
,.....
..... '
//
/'
/' '
~-
12
6
9
10
11
13
~.
____ ... ----------- 1
'.
.-/....,
.---- --...~....
- ~- -----
,--' !
"J~
"
,J
~
[I
GLATTING
JACKSON
KERCHER
ANGLIN
LOPEZ
RINEHART
33 East Plno s_
0rWId0. PI. 32801
P: 407 843 6552
P: 407 839 1789
H
0
~ ro
~ '"0
.....
;.....
CI) 0
...-
() ~
cj r.rJ
~ OJ)
fr c
.,..... {/l
CI) ;..... .....
P- ....
~ C/) 0
H ;..... CI)
cj (1)
......
S c
.....
0 ~
" <+-
0
CI>> >-,
.-::
1- U
>
0
F'RO..II:T"". 15lH
<:eSIGNEOBY CSH
"""""'BY ./Mil
<><",""BY CllE
"'''' 09.10.0.1
0SlED FOR
".-..
""^"",,SC'I..E ,-.ow
ilJi rn
OFT 60 100 Nonh
""'''''''.".
EXHIIIT N\JM8BI
7
5H'Er 7 CF 12
G
E
o
c
B
A
~
L
12
13
:.1.
~,
..
'1
""~
"'
J'~
" -..'~ I I,
.~----,:. .,.'
4"~'J""" _ - ......:.--:, -.1
~. --......"!'b " ~
.#;.J.
.
/
/~ '
-=. './. I.
"". - ",.
./~-
L I .
.~ ;;$~',
./;------ \
~~I'j ,._-;- ~
,', I'~ ~~
, --.:~ -, ..-
_~~ " ',I r: ,
'fill:!" L I.'. ~~
,-,1 j ~.," : ,'r'" ~, ~;
.~~4 I!
I .. '-~' c1
.. ,II
""'0... .1;:' '
_1~~ . ~~~' j'iJ
.~- ~~~~'~~~- ~~
$'_ ''''''':'~''-'
'il',)i -~,
~~''ioo,
--.JI"'
I. II I
,'" I .
~ 1~_.~. '~'~:.
1";;1
./
/./
./
.//
/
.
'Fa ~
//
///
. ,
. .
. ,
. !
~ ,. ~ It' '..-,
if
I
Ii'
."
.j
"",-ift
I ~.,..~ ~'.
~~"1 !~-
- ,.l" ".r
.
I, ,J";
,);1
I'i "L
! ~ ~ ".
."
~ ...
11,1
r1
. I~
. ,,-:-~
. "'7\"i"'.&,.1.,
;~. ,"':"-
l~" ~
, '1, Q -Ii
!'J
r 'I""" I
:1 "
J ~
----
I
I.'
Site Boundary - Parcel 14
- Aerial Flown: 01.00
- ~~.~)~
,
.. j
8
.
. .....-.- .. 1IIiiIIii-'
11 12
4 '..
9
10
13
"I
[I
GLATTING
JACKSON
KERCHER
ANGLIN
LOPEZ
RINEHART
_ 33EastPlDoS_
0rIalld0, PI. 32801
P: 407 843 6552
P: 407 839 1789
L!
0
~ ro
~ '"0
.;::
CI) 0 ..c::
() G:
cj r.rJ~ ~
'"'
~ OJ)
fr .;= 0
.....
CI) 5- 0
..c::
~ifJ ~
H ;..... .....
cj (1) ~
s ...... ....
C '"'
~ Q)
0 <:
<+-
" 0
CI>> >-,
......
.....
1- U
>
0
F'RO..II:T"". lSlH
!JESG<El)BY CSH
"""""'BY .11I11
<><",""BY CllE
"'''' 09.10.0.1
6SlEO "'"'
"_..
""""""SC'I..E ,......
ruJ rn
OFT .. 100 .....
"""""".".
EXHIBIT HUM8ER
8
5H'Er 8 CF 12
H
I
"
UI_
Cl.
00
J'
A
~
I
J .
H
----;/
.'
G -__
--~
1
L~
.......f.
"
...,
.,
',/.
.....
../-
.... ..'
';(
..-'
~/
,,/~
I
E
....c...
/'./ \
/'
A
/
./
....
"
\
........\"
, /'
"t'"
\_i '.
o
'----1
/.....
,.
/'
..r .."'"
...., ,'"
...~. '..".
....
"
/.).~
--- '
..--,""
----.....".
2
3
-'1
.....
.....
,.
--...~-
...
/
-----
"
'1
,,(
."......--
---
,',
.-....
..-
~/
,..,;,,,...
"
.'
./"
/
"
....
.-/~/'.
",../....-'...,......
/'
,r'"
./
'(
,/'
//'
'.
,._fl.,.
/J">"",
,/' \
.7---1
...,...",,,./'
,./"
'-.('"
-----
.-:._-- -
-, ...
I I ,
/ .
, .
...........
--I
:_-4
1__..-"','.---.
. ---"4
,
i
~ i
__--I .--"'--'.--1
. ,I, .--r..... ".
,...........
./"" ;.---/
---.', ...---:, ".1 ,~-'/ -'-.--"'-.....
...___ ______,r .,/r '"
....... '....... - .
" I ~ \, ./
..._-~ -- -~',.' '. ,-()/
..., ".. .,/ '\
"
...
....
//....----'\. ...............
/ ....., -............
-..... ...... . \: //
........... -"---...., ,1..-' ,~
~......... -.........!..------. , -~ ~.".
--....... -....------~ ~'.
-~ -_./""
-~,-----' ,
c
_-I
...
~/".
,,-
'/
B
-"
A,
.............
/ ......
'z
.................. .
c-..............
4.
L
---
~'
--
,'"
,/"
--"".-\..
,..- "\
./
/
"
','
-'-......
..
/
-"
,.............
\
/
"\
:"--..
;'
...
--,
./"
-~ . ~
'--~("':
,
,.
'.
."....
'"
'"''
.,;".......", ------------\
'\.'.. .. '..
~ / ,
. ---../
\
\.
.'
..........
'.
;----.
-",'"
,-"
).
.,-#/ "
/'
/'
,
\
\,
"
...
"
,,/ .
_/'
.'
/
~-:,
/' ,
4
\......
/\
..-
;/
6
9
Site
Parcel 14
.J
J
---
,..
,
9
10
12
13
11
'.
..'
,
.....
..-
....'>.\
/<~...../
.'~ ./
--- -----
,----'
_",r ,..""
,.'-'- .,.,'
" .,
..! ,,"
..
- .J
~ '.
.~
4.~ .,
...
..
J
----
'-,
;
,
i
/----------
,
,
'.\
J"'
;
\
,_/
,
"
"
-"",
...
Wetland Preservation Area
-;
Upland Preservation Area
Upland Enhancement Area
Retail/Office 160,000 Square Feet
Drainage Easement
250' Setback from Residential
Site Boundary - Parcel 14
10
~-
.
13
11
12
",
".
'.
...,
'.
i
..
~---""'"" C
-,
-t --____.....:
"
--
"I
[I
GLATTING
JACKSON
KERCHER
ANGLIN
LOPEZ
RINEHART
33 East Plno s_
0rIalld0,Pl.32801
P: <<n 843 6551
P: 407 839 1789
H
0
~ ro
~ '"0
.;::
CI) 0
() G: c
cj r.rJ~ ~
~ OJ) .....
fr c ~
.;:: Q)
CI) {/l
0... ~
~ lf1
;..... 't:l
cj (1) C
S ...... ~
c ....:l
0 ~
" <+-
0
CI>> >-,
......
I- .,.....
> U
0
F'RO..II:T"". 1579Il
!JESG<El)BY CSH
""""BY .11I11
0<ECl0<l BY CllE
"''' 09.10.0.1
6SlEO "'"'
--
"""""SC'I..E ,......
r'1.,ri rn
OFT 1IO 100 NorIt
""""".".
EXHllITN....Bffi
9
5H'Er 9 CF 12
...,
G
E
o
B
.J
A
-.J
I
5
9
H
~~
~
Stonnwater Pond
Parcel 13
A.lllIIIOtlIco
G
\\
E
o
c
Po""" 19
01Ilce
B
Legend
1
1
I: - "
Seminole County Jurisdiction
I City of Oviedo Jurisdiction
I City of Winter Springs Jurisdiction
~ Wetland Conservation Area
A
L
2
9
6
10
11
icn1 PcclIitb, lIIId lip III B 12D-bec1
01 r1 t7II1 D!lt <m:eocl 75,000 SF or 7
oved ill Pmcol16111l1Y c:bmIp III tIlD
110 Cl!!Ill, ht-. mIl lIlIl BI2IlI8l' m
lbll azchmll\ll of ftllllIl BDd of&e III!lI
os betften Pm:celI13,15, 16, 17,20,
lqIIire an~ III tIlD PUDlIIId
LBDd U...
PHASIllll BDd Ib APPROVBD
~
0flIc0
SUBSTANl1AL DBVIA'l1ON
PHASB 2
RdanK>1!Ico
IJ.IOtBco 1
PHASll3
RdaIlIOfBce
ReIIdmIla1
12
City of Oviedo
13
LaIld Ucc Pm:cI
Retol1 12
RdDI1 13
TolllI
City of Winter Springs
I..m1d Uco
R.dDlJIOfflce
TolllI
Seminole County
Lmld U""
RcaIIIOfIIcCl
R.etalIIOtIlal
R.ecalIIOfBce
0flIc0
0flIc0
R.ecalIIOfBce
R.ecalIIOfBce
IldaI1/OfBce
0flIc0
Rd3lIIOf!l<:m
IldaI1/OfBce
RdaiIIClfficc
RtiIalIIOtBce
BOIpilaIIOf!ico
R.cmlIIOfIIco
lbalIIOt!Ico
!IdIllIIOfIIco
!IdIllIIOfIIco
R.cmlIIOfIIco
~
TOTAL
LAND USB BY PHASB
Pm=!(u)
20.2111, 21b, 23, 24, 25, 29.1
29 30 31 32
19 22 12.9
1 1 17
TI
13 1 15
TI
36
Pm:cI
14
Pm:cI
15 7.5
16 5.1
17 1.2
18 4.2
19 3.3
20 1.4
21A 1.4
21B 11.9
22 5.4
23 0.9
Z4 2..6
25 1.0
26 3.0
r1 15.6
28 1.1
29 1.2
30 IA
31 1.6
32 1.6
36 1.3
72.7
101.4
15.6
46.0
1.3
!leveIDpmrmt
~
250,197 SF
800 SF
1 SF
104 1 SF 1
419000 SF
o ID 120 Beda
4DU
1750
2AO
L8IId U...
RdDil/I)ffke
0flIc0
BoIpIlnL1JtIll:e
llesidlmW
StDrm_!'\lDdIIBomnv Plm
WetWld~
Cana1J aIId C8IlI1 ~
10
11
36
12
1.3
48.6
89.3
20.2
36.0
30.8
431.2
13
440
"I
[I
GLATTING
JACKSON
KERCHER
ANGLIN
LOPEZ
RINEHART
33 Eat Plno s_
0rIalld0,Pl.32801
P: 407 843 6552
P: 407 839 1789
H
G
o
~ ro
~~
CI) 0
() ~ 00
cj Ui~ c
'"a- ~ .~
~ .- ..c
CI) ~ Po.
~ (/) .....
H ;..... U
cj 2 .~
S .::: 8
O~Po.
"6
CI>>.c
.- .~
>u
o
E
o
F'RO..II:T"".
_BY
""''''''BY
0<ECl0<l BY
"''''
5SlB) FOR:
"_...
157H
CSH
-
CllE
09.10.0.1
c
B
CfY,WN) SCALf '''''100'
rtJi rn
OFT 100 IOD Nl:MUl
""""".".
A
EXHIIIT NlMBER
10
5H'Er 10 CF 12
~
I
3
6
,
9
10
12
13
"I
- [I
I
ii -
I
I
L
Oviedo Marketplace PUD
Mas-te.r Plan N ores - -
(1) Project Name: Oviedo Marketplace PUD
Location:
Legal Description:
Site Acres:
PUD Type:
See Sheet 1 of 12
See Sheet 2 of 12
:t 49.5 Acres
Planned Commercial Center
(2) Project Team:
See Sheet 1 of 12
(3) Vicinity Map: See Sheet 3 of 12
H
(4) Existing Land Use and Zoning: See Sheet 4 of 12
(5) Natural Features
Topography and 100 Year Floodplain: See Sheet 5 of 12
Land Use and Cover: See Sheet 6 of 12
(6) Soils:
See Sheet 7 of 12
G
Exhibit 7, Soils, was derived from the D.L.I. Properties Application for
Development Approval (ADA) soils map. The map identifies two distinct
soil areas on the site: swamp, which makes up the wetland portion of the
site to be preserved, and fine sand, which makes up the upland portion of
the site. The soils identified on the site include:
. Swamp
. lmmokalee Fine Sand
. Rutledge Fine Sand
. Leon Fine Sand
. Lakewood Sand
. Pomello Fine Sand
These soils are common to other developed areas of Seminole County.
The existence of these other developments, especially those in the
immediate vicinity of the site, confirms the suitability of these soils for
future development.
o
The Immokalee, Leon and Rutledge fine sand series dominate the upland
portion of the site, and are generally associated with transitional soils.
They are often located in nearly level tracts, as they are here, adjacent to
wet areas of flatwoods, and connected to low lands. This area of the si te
has historically been used for farming and pasture.
(7) Aerial Photo: See Sheet 8 of 12
(8) Land Use Plan: See Sheet 9 of 12
c
Land Use
Development Program
Acres
Development - Retail/Office 15.1
Wetland Conservation 29.2
Upland Conservation 5.2
TOTAL 49.5
160,000 Sq Ft
160,000 Sq Ft
(9) Max Building Height
B
See (15) Other Development Restrictions.
(10) Project Phasing:
See Sheet 10 of 12
Parcel 14 is part of Phase 3 of the Oviedo Marketplace Development of
Regional Impact.
A
,-,
1
(11) Public Facilities
Adequate pulitic facilities are availahlefor devel6p.ment of Parcel 14.
Roads:
Improvements and mitigations required in the DRI Development
Order prior to developing Parcel 14 are as follows:
Red Bug Lake and SR 436 - The Developer shall pay Developer's
proportionate share of the cost of a study of improvement needs for
the specified intersections, which proportionate share shall be based
on the ratio of Project traffic to total traffic. For purposes of this
Development Order, Developer's proportionate share shall be
deemed to be $75,000, which shall constitute Developer's mitigation
for the Project's impact upon the specified intersection. Within
thirty days after receipt of written notice from either the Florida
Department of Transportation or Seminole County that such study
has been authorized, Developer shall pay its proportionate share
directly to such party. (The Developer has met this obligation.)
SR 434 and SR 426 - As mitigation for any impact on the
intersection of SR 434 and SR 426, Division Street shall be extended
from Mitchell Hammock Road to CR 419 in a 2-lane configuration.
Pursuant to Rule 9j-2.045(7) a Florida Administrative Code, this
condition shall be deemed satisfied if such improvement is (i) in place
and operational, (ii) under actual construction for the entire
improvement, or (iii) committed for construction in the current
three years of the City of Oviedo's Capital Improvement Element.
In addition, Developer shall conveyor cause to be conveyed an
approximately 5.04 acre site as more particularly described on Exhibit
"D" attached hereto to the City of Oviedo for use as wetland
mitigation for South Division Street. This provision shall be
modified by Seminole County in the event that the City of Oviedo
modifies its comprehensive plan with respect to Division Street.
SR 426 must be widened to four lanes from Mitchell Hammock
Road to Winter Springs Boulevard. This improvement must be
committed for construction within the first 3 years of the FDOT 5
Year Work Program prior to commencement of Phase 3b
development, In the event that this iluprovement is not committed
for construction within the first 3 years of the FDOT 5 Year Work
Program, the Developer may proceed with construction of phase 3b
if Developer (i) advances the funds necessary for the construction of
such improvement, or (ii) conducts a final monitoring/modeling
program in accordance with the requirements of Paragraph 13(a)
above which demonstrates that such improvement is not required.
The status of these improvements is reported in the DRI Annual
Reports.
Sanitary Sewer:
Seminole County is currently providing sanitary sewer service to
Oviedo Marketplace and is anticipated to be the provider of sanitary
sewer service to Parcel 14 as well. Treatment capacity will be
provided at the Iron Bridge Treatment Plant for wastewater
generation from the project. Gravity sewer system improvements
exist to the property boundary. Extension of the gravity sewer
system improvements within the parcel boundary will be
constructed, owned and operated by the parcel developer.
Considering that Parcel 14 is within the jurisdictional limits of the
City of Winter Springs, it may be possible for the sewer service to be
assigned to the City of Winter Springs via a utility service agreement
between Seminole County and the City of Winter Springs.
Parcel 14 is projected to have a wastewater flow of 0.0160 MGD
(million gallons per day). This estimate was calculated assuming all
160,000 square feet of approved development area is retail services.
If a mix of uses is built, the wastewater flow may differ.
6
9
11
I
The adopted level of service standard for sewer in Seminole County
is 300 gallons per day per ERC (Equivalent Residential Connection).
The estImated wastewater flow of 0.0160 MGD for Parcel 14 is
equivalent to 53.3 ERC's. The proposed development therefore
does not exceed the adopted level of service.
Potable Water:
Seminole County is currentlV providing water service to Oviedo
Marketplace and is anticipated to be the provider of water service to
Parcel 14 as well. Existing Oviedo Marketplace infrastructure
improvements include a 10-inch looped water main within the
internal road rights-of-way 40nnecting to a 12-inch water main
along Red Bug Lake Road. The 10-inch water main is adjacent to
the Parcel 14 boundary and 'is fitted for service to the subject parcel.
Considering that Parcel 14 is within the jurisdictional limits of the
City of Winter Springs, it may be possible for the water service to be
assigned to the City of Winter Springs via a utility service agreement
between Seminole County and the City of Winter Springs.
Parcel 14 is projected to have a potable water demand of 0.0160
MGD (million gallons per day). This estimate was calculated
assuming all 160,000 square feet of approved development area is
retail services. If the proposed mix of uses is built, the potable water
demand may differ.
The adopted level of service standard for potable water service in
Seminole County is 350 gallons per day per ERC (Equivalent
Residential Connection). The estimated potable water demand of
0.016 MGD for Parcel 14 is equivalent to 45.7 ERC's. The
proposed development therefore does not exceed the adopted level
of service,
Stormwater Management:
The Dovera Community Development District (CDD) was formed
to assure the accomplishment of the intended objectives of the
proposed stormwater management program and compliance with the
objectives set forth in Chapter 29-F-19.001, Florida Administrative
Code. The DRI Development Order states, "The CDD is
responsible for implementing an inspection and maintenance
program for all components of the surface water management system
for the Project site to assure that the components continue to operate
at their design capacities for the life of the Project. The CDD shall
be responsible for all applicable permit conditions imposed with
respect to the surface water management system by the St. johns
River Water Management District." The CDD has been established
and is in place to maintain common areas in Parcel 14.
The master drainage system for all of Oviedo Marketplace was
designed and permitted through the St. johns River Water
Management District and Seminole County and meets the City of
Winter Springs 25 year, 24-hour storm event LOS standard.
Fire Protection:
Fire protection will be provided by the City of Winter Springs.
(12) All exhibits indicate the title, date of submittal, and dates of any
subsequent revisions. Additionally, the exhibits are at a graphic scale
of one (1) inch per two hundred (200) feet.
(13) No additional information has been requested by the City.
10
11
12
13
GLATTING
JACKSON
KERCHER
ANGLIN
LOPEZ
RINEHART
33 East Plno s_
0rIalld0, PI. 328111
P: 407 8436552
P: 407 839 1789
H
G
o
~ ro
~~
Cl)2
()~
cj if]
~ OJ)
~c
~ .....
CI) a
~ifJ
H ;.....
cj 2
S .:::
O~
,,<0
CI>> .-2
1- ()
>
o
{/l
Q)
.....
o
Z
E
F'Rl..ECT~. 157'86
ClE.SGNED1N' CSH'
~WNBY JMM
Oi-::oo:aJ BY cae
o "'''' 09.10.0.1
lSSlB)FOR:
"_..
c
B
""""""""'"
"""""'""
A
EXHIIIT NUMBeR
11
5H'Er 11 CF 12
.J
L
--.J
~
::
~
~
g
~
~
u
~
-
~
.w
~
~
...
~
~
o
~
~
.~
:;.
o
-0
v
:l
C
""
C
o
U
'"
v
""
o
Z
C
"
0::
....
~
'"
"
~
""
U
'C
""
'"
a
""
C
v
8
0.,
o
V
>
v
Q
c
'a
:l
8
8
o
u
"
....
v
>
o
Q
~
......
~
C 5 ~
v 0... -0 O..t:::
0., C ..t::: ""
0"<1",,""00
C c.......... .... :>-....
~ov8..gc8
..oSuov"O
'" .... '0 -0 -0 '"
" S " ,,'~ C-O
..t::: 0 0... 0 > " C
~uotJ8-o"
Q:::::l-B v o.,c......
1"\" .... "v
>-1<...., "'-0 u...... 0
UOlc:.=l..t:::C
~v"""..ou~
uU-OVg,~o
'r: ~ c ~ <...., z..
t; c " o..,g 0 ~
..... ll) looo-l tI'.l ~ C I:"d
Q c d coo.>
"".~ Q 0 ""'0 r: .
c" 0., -0 " 0., -0
~ S ~ 0 ~ ~ .... ~
\::v"c"o.,o....
g<-B "& o.~ 0 z.. .,g
.......... 08-0-0 u""
v " v C:.=l
>..g~1 \::-0 o:l..o c
v v " 8 "" c ;:) 0
Q-~ Ooo.,v
..0 :::::l C '0 "" U
C'U; 0 " v " 0 c
'a c -0 v .... .... c "
OVM"t; ....
:l o.,'~ " "" .~ Q :l
" '" > c "c ~
\:: V 0 ~ .... .~ " ....
s.... '."t: S ~ .~
oovs",-o C
U ..0 ..t::: :::::l .v " O:.=l
o "" .; .E v" -B ii
~ 4-l C ;;:>;,:: u t:: C'C
~ -0 :c 1"\ ~ C .~ :.=l
>o",,>-I"-l"..t:::0
o ..t::: .~ Q _ c .~ ""
Q~ u~~::;~
..0 v ;:) C 0'
o " U 0 "".~ -0 0
..t:::"""..t:::"5"C-o
t-< ~ ~t-< U 8..::J "
J:
~ "" "
o5.a~ \::
<.;:i c "":.=l "" ~
o 0 V 0 ';::1 '"
:Do.,......t:::a~
.~ E a ~ v 4.J
co~....0.,5
&Uo..g~8
",:::::l "" "'..0 v
~ " B'~ ~ M
..............:.=l o::\i
.~..g : ~ 0. ~
QS~~~8
Q ~"o,u:::::l....:
UM....co:lB..;
o 0 0... M .... " .~
..t::: l5.. v 'u;..g ~ ""
t-< v -B ~ 0 v.~
: u........:D~a
.. t: 0 'OJ .,...; tt ~
~,,<.;:i..t:::C:lc
-o5s""0"'0
O....cv;;;o.vs
..... ~ d)..c ll)
"",,:>-~....""~
5 s : ~ v B c
8-oco..o",,~
0., c ~ g<:::::l ~ ~
o"\:: "0.,....
.... coo';;; '" V
o 0 M "" 0 ""
>.~ " v Q .... ~
vuc;:)Q..t:::p
Q v ~ cu.:::
...... ~ \:: '0 ~ ~
d c .... C v >
.~ 0 O..t::: -0 .~
Qc;;;ut-<~~
o " ~ ~ 0 '"
..t:::M C .o.,c
""covus..t:::
C '0 ~ c v.~ 0
.~ c 't 0"0' '" "
-oV:lg<....c..;
B 8 '" \:: 0... .9 r.rJ
n v <u 0 Q).~ 0)
"'"Q.-Bu-B-o-B
..':lS<....,.,g<....,5:>-
....,.~ 0 "" 0 u..o
(!)
""
o
c
..,
:l
..0
o
-0
:l
u
C
:;;j
..t:::
'"
S
"
5b
o
....
0.,
v
U
~
C
v
..,
C ..
'@ 8
8-0
-0 B
~ 's
C:.=l
o 0
.c ..0
~z..
0., .c
'" '"
c '"
.~ '"
'" v
.~ U
...c: IIJ
t-< c
8 -0 ~
..,..... ~ ~ -B ....
c --:- -og",o<.8
-o~ 8 C:l-o....c;]
c .;: 0 v " .... ~..g.o
,,-0 -<c~v:>"'c
'" 0 "c 0 .., .. 0 0:
'U; '" > 0 N :l '" ......, .
,"0 o ",;.:::I..o:l:lOV
..0 .~ 8 ~'E'E.9 -0 o.,'~
~ ~ ~ 0.,,0.,) c ~ ~ v ..,
_0 t...._ooo...c:u
:l U ..t::: ';:; .... U C .... .., I!)
M~ ~..,..g..,<....,o.,o"o'
~~ t:~"'.aou~cl:
,"0 .uB""c;l~..t:::
Cc;l gp~~~>......t:::~
o > ..... c I!) 0 8 u ..,
CO ~~5~S-o:CC
o 8 0 c '0 c ~ c ~ 0
~ I!) 8 '@ " 0 0 " '" ~
u.... ."y"..t::: ..I!)....
I!) v M \::;.:::1 \:: .., C '0 .9
o.,..t::: ..... 0., s .. 0 .~ ..,
",'" I!) 0 0., 0 ""0 > ~
.S .... '" --;: <.;:i '" U .~ n 'B c
M..g "'.~ ~ -0 c;.:::l I!) " 0
~ C.., \:: C .~ .~ M...... u
.... ~ 0..... '" "..t::: u v u
'0 C '0.> .... <...., ."" <is > B C
~ouB~o~",u..::J;.:::I
o > :l " .... 0 c'o 0 "
0.1!)t: o.,M~O"....:l
0:::::l1l ~c;l;;l ~ S:l tin 0'
c<is 0 C c :l ~ I!) g' c ~
. c "0'" u M .~..,
:.=l'~ ~ C u'~ '" 0 0.,,,
.~ ~ 0 B .~ ~ -B ;:D ~ ~
"-l....c;:lcu....oS'"..;:JM
.....0 .....@ ;:) o..t::: .;; C C
IIJ <? 0 ,,-0 u ..... '" ,"'0
~S-B\::l!)oIl!lB~:::::U
~ 0 0 M-B 0 '" <...., I!) ~
M CC ~:>ou'+..j
C C .....o.~ M~" C '"
t.~ 0 :l 0 C " S c '"
o ::; '" 0 M.~ u .... 0 c z..
.., o'r: .J c -0';::1 o.~ 0 I!)
Vl:::::l..oI-l<O~t::t;cc~
-;;;-..g ~ ..--... ~ M ~ 0 I!) '0; 0
u..o u I!).......t::: "" '" >
.... u .., ~ S ~
w
'"
c
o
'0
u
'r:
""
'"
o
~
..,
C
IIJ
S
0.,
o
V
>
o
Q
....
I!)
..t:::
..,
o
If)
......
~
V I
..t::: 0
t-< '"
:l
.. 0
~~
'r: -0
o.,c
Vl '" ..
'"
.... .. c
o :>- 0
C ; '0
.~ 0., u
~sB
<...., 0 '"
o U ~
c'"c
..... .... l1)
u.~ 8
o > 0.,
..t::: 0 0
""..t::: ....
C .., ~
I!) .. I!)
v C-o
l c M
o :l c
..0 0 .~
.., u ~
C IIJ 0
o-:::::l
sg..g
v ';::1 v
~ t:..t:::
MV'"
<r.rJ~
C 0" ~
I!) -0 .
S .~ ~
o >......
"t: 0 ..
'i) <...., 0
VlO]
vc"
..c ._ "1::
t-<UO
o
....
o I!) C
1". <...., <...., ~ 0....
OJJ 00 B
.S C 'i) 'i) -5 ] ~ ..;
-0 -0" 0 0 .~ .., '<:' '"
~ C -0 <.;:i <.;:i ..t::: C ~ '><
:l'"C lf10~ ..::JI!)O
..0 c:l r-- 0 '" o.,..t::: ""
,;'00 Nnv ....,0
-0 '0 ..0 C C u ~ C C
'" C v .~.~.... v 0 '"
o I!)..t::: ...c:..t::: ~ ........ I!)
.... 4-l 4.J 4.J 4.J ~ 4.J ~ 0
.. ~ <...., .~ .:; -0 .... ~-o
M v 0 .. .~ II) 0
C-o"" ..,..,;;l .o.,..t:::c
'C1 C I!) II) 0 ;.:::I '" 0
-t1 "v ~ ~ v " '0
'"c<.;:i lf1lf1-B u~n
O"oo<!in......<...., ..t:::....o
M lf11!) .. 0 U"M
C '0 N '" -0" C .... v
.~ C C ;:) v ~ ~ '7 ~ >
'"'d B _..-I 4.J ~ tI:l '"'d ~ 4-i .........t
:l1!)..t:::c8;:)c ......:l'"
u ~ .::: ~ v c;l '@ t:: ..0 ~
.S v ~'U; ",,'0 s '" .,g ;;;
.:;;;-o~gclIJ ~""c
c~B..,~"" cM
o .., C ~.~ 0 ~.~ c
S gp's ~..t::: ~ -B c] '51
0....... .... C'C U'l '-' t:: ""0 .....
o -0 0....,., ~ coo :l ~
v..:l o.,-o..t::: o<.;:i ",_ v
>UV"MU'" "UI!)
o ~..o -0 .~ "II) s c ....
-0 I!) C 0 ~~. .~ .,g
"":::::l,"..t:::,, ,"..t:::I!):>
o :l .~ .., lf1:::::l M..o ..
Z..o ~ U M v \0 .~ .~
~..--...v .S..t::: .... ::;..t:::::;:l c"
..; ell Q3 '(Y:Q ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~
c I!) .~ .... .~ 0 c '" 0 0...
I!):g~o...:l ..:l..g~
S ..... I!) ~ c C t-< I B c
o.,ou...c: .,"," \OCII)
o .~ <is "" ~ -0 -0 B < v S
v u I!) c..t::: C c.., U
> '" M II) .~:l :l c:::i "" 5'
o....'"VI!)OOllJo:lO-
Q I!) .S ~ ::c ..0..0 U i:>..g v
..t:::"tJ OV'"P1>
~..,.... v..--.....t:::..t:::~ 00
,"0-0..0..0..,,,,, "U"<I"Q
u
'"
C
o
'0
U
'r:
..,
'"
v
~
..,
o
.....l
M
C
:.Q
....
"
0...
~
......
~
m
....
"
- ]
" .~
.~ '"
U ....
~ 0
8 ..
s E
o ~
U ....
v u; 4.J
M "..
~ ~]
- '" U
~ M2
- c..,
's v ~..!.
.-.~ ~ 8
Vl Vl C't1 V
.... 0 0., '"
O..t::: c "
~ "" .~ \::
II) C -0 0
~o~tb
~ ~.::: ~
.., :l " U
J,..j 0 t:;.....
O..t::: ~ ~
u ~1 0., v --ci
'" " '"
t:r--~....B
~ 0.....
.. 0 ..,... ..0
]..,o~:c
u] C C 0
:l "':::::l '" ....
b'- C'C V'J ~
I S..t::: -0 v
's;.:::l '" 0..0
v v ~ ~:::::l
'" ..0 c;l <...., '"
<""':::::l '" 0';;;
o " ....
M..t::: 0 ~ c
c '" 0 " v
:.Q~"8~S
....u:l..t:::O"
~ :c 0 t-< 'S
. I!) . . 0'
...... > N n v
.0:
___,__,...--.o~C1
co
Cl>
~
::
~
~
M
~ z P.i I~
05l~N
~8~~~
~~~~8
u~~
Ht;!::l-
0: U
~jH
J:
saloN _fJ U 0 q
d
~ ~ C\I
Bp~lOl.::l 's~u~ldS l~lULM. jO ^l~J ......
~ ~ C\I I>
and g:)uldl~))lluillOpa!^o q~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~-- C\I
! ~ I I Ii ......
~u ~ ! ~ i
Ii ~
(!)
w
o
u
CIl
<(
"I
ATTACHMENT D
C'
ATTACHMEr~T E
-~
.
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
OVIEDO MARKETPLACE
.
Prepared for:
~
The Viera Company
Prepared by:
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
:.
March 2001
GJ #15796
.
T ABLE OF CONTENTS
Section(s) Subiect
I
Application
A.
B.
C.
Survey
Legal Description
Owner Authorization
II
Project Description
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
Introduction
Property History
Proposed Amendment
Development Plan
Development Order
Settlement Agreement
Project Team
Conclusions
ill. Consistency with Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code
.
A. 9J-5.0055 Concurrency Management System
B. 9J-5.006 Future Land Use Element
C. 9J-5.007 Traffic Circulation Element
D. 9J-5.0II Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Stormwater Management,
Potable Water and Natural Ground-Water Aquifer Recharge
Element
E. 9J-5.0I3 Conservation Element
F. 9J-5.0I4 Recreation and Open Space Element
G. 9J-5.0I6 Capital Improvements Element
IV. Consistency with City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan
f;
A. Traffic Circulation
B. Land Use
C. Conservation
D. Housing
E. Recreation and Open Space
F. Solid Waste
G. Potable Water
H. Sanitary Sewer
1. Storm Drainage and Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge
1. Capital Improvements
v.
Consistency with East Central Florida Strategic Regional Policy Plan
.
A. Economic Development
B. Natural Resources
Page
Paee
1-3
1-4
1-5
II-I
II-I
II-2
II-2
II-3
II-3
II-4
II-4
III-I
III-5
. III-II
III -11
III-13
III-14
III-14
IV-I
IV-3
rv-7
IV-IO
IV-II
IV-I2
IV-I2
IV-13
IV-13
IV-I5
V-I
V-I
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 2001
~
Page ii
. TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Section(s) Subiect Paee
C. Transportation V-3
D. Land Use V-S
E. Public Facilities V-6
VI. Consistency with the State Comprehensive Plan
A. Water Resource VI-1
B. Natural Systems and Recreation Lands VI-2
C. Energy VI-2
D. Land Use VI-2
E. Transportation VI-3
F. Employment VI-3
VII. Maps and Plans
A. Location Map VII-1
B. Site Aerial VII-2
C. Existing Zoning VII-3
D. Existing Future Land Use VII -4
E. Topography and 100 Year Floodplains VII - 5
. F. Land Use and Cover VII -6
G. Soils VII-7
H. DRIMaster Development Plan (Revised Map H) VII-8
H-2. Site Master Development Plan VII-9
I-I. Pre-Development Drainage Conditions VII-1 0
1-2. Post-Development Drainage Conditions VII -II
J. Local Jurisdictional Boundaries VII-12
VIII. Appendixes
A Seminole County Development Order
B Amended Settlement Agreement
C Service Agreement Letters
~ D Eagle Nest Abandonment Letter
E Traffic Studies
.
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 2001
.
~.
.
...~.-
~,~.' ra,"""'h .
4fbuP "
'~~
\
\
\
\
\""
'"'-.
...................,
",-
"~-.
......-......-.-.....,.........-
---..~~
oviedomarketplace
~".~--....
'-,-.
- ----._..,---~ --.~ - -.-.-'
~::--.._-
s
@
Or=l
o
~
M
o r:-l
r::-I
~
p,
~
~
"
CITY OF W1NTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
.
. 1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32708-2799
Telephone (407) 327-1800
Community Development Dept.
Planning OMsionAPPLICATION FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
(TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP - 2010)
APPLI CANT : H:1yo C:u:ey s.
Last First Middle
Gl.attirrJ Jad<s:n Ferl::h:r Arglin I.q:ez Ri.rHmt, In:.
ADDRESS: 33 E. ~ st.n:et
PHONE:
OrJ.an:D
City
(417) 843-6552
F1crida
State
32001
Zip Code
If applicant does not own the property, provide the following:
.
OWNER:
'Ire Viera Cbt{Eny
Last
4
First
Middle
ADDRESS: 7300 Mn:relllb3d, Slits XlI
PHONE:
Viera
City
(321) 242-1XD
Florida
State
32940
Zip Code
This is a request
P1anrEd I:eve.lcpra1t
(~ O::u1tyJ
described below.
Tax Parcel Number:
for change of Future Land.Use designation from
to MiJaj U:E on the property
(City of Winter ~)
17-21-31-:n)..(X)lH-OXO
Size of Parcel:
49.5
. sq. ft /acres.
Address of Property proposed for change of Future Land Use
Designation:
ADDRESS: DJvera Irive
. Winter Sprj.rg3 Florida '3Z765
Ci ty~ state ~ip Code
,.
.
.
.
>
Present Zoning of the Parcel:
RD (S:rnim1e' O:mty)
Reason for request of change of Future Land Use Designation:
'Ire ParcEl vas ~ into t:h:! City arxi ra:rls a City of Winter SprirI]s 1an:1 UX! d:signa.tim.
'Ite MiJI.Erl U:E categ:lry will al1.av far t:h:! prq:ca:rl rnba:l u:e ~.
- -
TO BE SUPPLIED AT TIME OF SUBMISSION OF APPLICATION:
*
A copy of the most recent survey of the subject
. property.
A copy of the legal description.
Notarized authorization of the owner (if applicant is
other than owner or attorney for owner) .
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application Fee.
*
*
*
Applicant/Owner Signature: ~....b rtCL<.fV
Date: 3. 2.l..P . D l
,1
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE.
CITY COMMISSION AS WELL AS APPROVAL BY THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY AFFAIRS. THE AMENDMENT IS NOT "EFFECTIVE UNTIL THE
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS ISSUES A "NOTICE OF INTENT" TO FIND
THE COMPREHENSIVE' PLAN AMENDMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE
REQUIREMENTS OF 163.3184 AND 163.3187, FLORIDA STATUES AND 9J-11
FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE.
APPLICANTS ARE ADVISED, THAT IF THEY DECIDE TO APPEAL ANY DECISIONS
MADE AT THE MEETINGS OR HEARINGS, WITH RESPECT TO. ANY MATTER
CONSIDERED AT THE MEETING OR HEARING, THEY WILL NEED A RECORD OF
THE PROCEEDINGS AND, FOR SUCH PURPOSES,:, THEY WILL NEED TO INSURE
THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, AT THEIR COST,
WHICH INCLUDES THE TESTIMOtIT AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS
TO BE BASED, PER 286.0105, FLORIDA STATUTES.
N
XX
\,.j E
XX
S
SCALE 1" = 200'
\ I
____JJ
II
I 33 II
I TUSCAWlLLA UNIT 7 I I
/ PLAT BOOK 22. PAGES 46 AND 47 - - - - T'
/ / / II
/ 23 I / I 11
sou L / 24 I I / ......... 32
rJ..{tf?( 'y u", ........ ........ / I 25 I / I ..... ..... ..... 11
t Of:' ru? ___ -J / 26 I I I \ \ ..... ~
C4li11.1.4 ........ ........ J... / 27 / I \ \
Ulvtr ;> ~ ___ /__ I 28 I \ \ 31./"f1
--- --- ........ S ~ J. 29 \ 30 \ / I \
. ~ ........ ........000.') \ fUTILITY AND I
~ --- ........ <9" DRAINAGE EASEMENT I
60, ................g \ II
o~ ")0 's' I.J ....... 6 \ \ \
~~ "c?>' Df?I\I1VI\Tt~'r'rI\" ................ 64).,. \
~' ""~<I\S.D ........,<7. I
~ ~Atnq........ J I
SE CORNER
TUSCAWILLA UNIT 7
P8 22, pes 46-47
w
NOT PLATTED
NOT PLATTED
~ = 138048'54"
R - 750.00'
L - 1817.09'
C - 1404.16'
CB - N. 19016'44"
9 21 1995
SEJ
S 14032'19" E
169.91'
S 71"20'10" E
164.74'
/
: ~
NN
LOa
~m
0,""""
~I")
a
(/)
S 89"37'40'. E
7'
w
1NI0T PLA TIED
49.551::t ACRES
/
-
W ~ -
-
- W.
o
NOR TH LINE.....
OF LOT 12 "
LINE BEARING DISTANCE
L1 N 72'46'44' W 63.09'
L2 S 63'0512' W 61.20
L3 S 53'50'30" E 4.28'
L4 S 16"0858" E 25.85
L5 S 36'03"21" E 19.28
L6 S 16'06 18" W 18.15'
L7 S '7'13 24' E 23.03
LB S 62'56'25" W 24.86
L9 S 65'39'42" W 22.91"
L10 S 40'51 '22" W 19.28
L11 S 14'4154' W 39.45
L12 S 07"28'11' W 53.00
L13 S 03'54'47' E 17.73'
L14 S 04'3201" W 32.26
L15 S 10"23'42" E 27.27
L16 S 21'2556 E 25.94
L17 S 57"13'53" E 26.73
L18 S 22'30 24' E 30.02
L19 S 17'32'14" W 34.51"
L20 S 12'34'08" W 35.7"
L21 S 20'39'55" E 50.30'
L22 S 14'47'38' W 3301
L23 S 38'46'47" W 36.55'
L24 S 69'23 30" W 30.77
L25 S 83"13'35" W 31.96
I I L26 N 83'26'48': W 29.09'
L27 S 86'46'10" W 122.80'
L20 N 8,':;:;';i' W 45.67'
L29 S 69'27'35' W 21.26
L30 N 87"32'46" W 146.71"
DATE BY REVISIONS
P.O.B.
NE CORNER: OF LOT 12
OVIEDO CROSSING-PHASE 18
A
A
LO ~
NtO
A .q-
,.....~
.q-
b~
a
z
" ~
'\)~
~ '
~.~ ~'\
~ ~ f'},.~' \
NOT PLATTED
~9~T~~ l!N2E "
\.If" LVI I
NOT PLATTED
LEGEND
P.O.B.
R/W
~
R
C!.
L
C
CB
PB
PGS
PC
PT
PEC/~~~~~,?~L ~R~ CONS~ ~~~~~'o, ~
Suite 1560 EoIa Park Centre 200 East Robln,aon Street. Or1ando, Florida 32801 407/422-8062
REVISED LEGAl DESCRIPTION
POINT OF BEGINNING
RIGHT-OF-WAY
CEN TERLlNE
RADIUS
CENTRAL ANGLE
ARC LENGTH
CHORD DiSTANCE
CHORD BEARING
PLA T BOOK
PAGES
PO!NT O~ CIJR\I.4.rURE
POINT OF TANGENCY
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A TRACT OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 21 SOUTH, RANGE 31 EAST DESCRIBED
AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 12, OVIEDO CROSSING -
PHASE 18, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK
47, PAGES 80, 81, 82, AND 83 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE
COUNTY, AS THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN THE FOLLOWING
COURSES ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 12; NORTH 72046'44" WEST,
63.09 FEET; SOUTH 63005'12" WEST, 61.20 FEET; SOUTH 53050'30" EAST,
4.28 FEET; SOUTH 16008'58" EAST, 25.85 FEET; SOUTH 36003'21" EAST,
19.28 FEET; SOUTH 16006' 1 8" WEST, 18.15 FEET; SOUTH 17013'24" EAST,
23.03 FErr; SOUTH 62056'25" WEST, 24.86 FEET; SOUTH 65039'42" WEST,
22.91 FEET; SOUTH 40051'22" WEST, 19.28 FEET; SOUTH 14041'54" WEST,
39.45 FEET; SOUTH 07028'11" WEST, 53.00 FEET; SOUTH 03054'47" EAST,
17.73 FEET; SOUTH 04032'01" WEST, 32.26 FEET; SOUTH 10023'42" EAST,
27.27 FEET; SOUTH 21025'56" EAST, 25,94 FEET; SOUTH 57013'53" EAST,
26.73 FEET; SOUTH 22030'24" EAST, 30,02 FEET; SOUTH 17032'14" WEST,
34.51 FEET; SOUTH 12034'08" WEST, 35.71 FEET; SOUTH 20039'55" EAST,
50.30 FEET; SOUTH 14047'38' WEST, 33.01 FEET; SOUTH 38046'47" WEST,
36.55 FEET; SOUTH 69023'30' WEST, 30.77 FEET; SOUTH 83013'35' WEST,
31.96 FEET; NORTH 83026'48" WEST, 29,09 FEET; SOUTH 86046'10" WEST,
122,80 FEr:T; NORTH 87033'11' WEST, 45.67 FEET; SOUTH 69027'35" WEST,
21.26 FEEt; NORTH 87032'46" WEST, 146.71 FEET; THENCE, DEPARTING SAID
NORTH LI~E OF tOT 12, RUN NORTH 57024'04" EAST, 29,61 FEET; THEt'J.CE
RUN NORTH 00047'25" EAST, 484.46 FEET TO A CURVE CONCAVE
NORT-HERL;Y; THENCE RUN WESTERLY AND THEN NORTHERLY ALONG SAID
CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS LENGTH OF 750.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
138048'54", AN ARC LENGTH OF 1817,09 FEET, A CHORD LENGTH OF 1404.16
FEET, AND A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 19016'44' WEST; THENCE RUN
NORTH 49050'01" EAST, 419.30 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF
TUSCAWIt.,LA UNIT 7, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN
PLAT BOOK 22, PAGES 46 AND 47 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE
COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID
TUSKAWILLA UNIT 7, SOUTH 70000'29" EAST, 664.21 FEET TO THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PLAT; THENCE RUN SOUTH 01007'52" EAST,
319,02 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89037'40" EAST, 520.75 FEET; THENCE RUN
SOUTH 14032'19' EAST, 169.91 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 71020'10" EAST,
164,74 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF,WAY OF THE
PROPOSED OVIEDO CROSSING TERRACE; THENCE RUN ALONG SAID PROPOSED
WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING COURSES; SOUTH 55015'44"
WEST, 200.22 FEET TO A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE RUN
SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS LENGTH OF 950.00
FEET, A CI:NTRAL ANGLE OF 19006'05", AN ARC LENGTH OF 316.71 FEET, A
CHORD LENGTH OF 315.25 FEET, AND A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH
45042'41" WEST; THENCE RUN SOUTH 36009'39" WEST, 275.09 FEET TO A
CURVE CONCA VE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE RUN SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG
SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS LENGTH OF 800.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE
OF 17048'35", AN ARC LENGTH OF 248.67 FEET, A CHORD LENGTH OF 247.67
FEET, AND A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 27015'22" WEST TO THE AFORESAID
NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 12 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND LIES IN SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA AND CONTAINS
49.551 ACRES, MORE OR LESS,
SURVEYOR'S NOTES:
(1 )
REPRODUCTIONS OF THIS SKETCH ARE NOT VALID UNLESS SEALED WITH THE
SURVEYOR'S EMBOSSED SEAL.
LANDS SHOWN HEREON WERE NOT ABSTRACTED FOR RIGHTS-OF-WAY, EASEMENTS,
OWNERSHIP, OR OTHER INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD BY THIS FIRM.
BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE RELATIVE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF TUSCAWllLA UNIT
7, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 22, PAGES 46
AND 47 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING SOUTH
70000'29" EAST,
THE "LEGAL DESCRIPTION" HEREON HAS BEEN PREPARED BY THE SURVEYOR AT THE
CLIENT'S REQUEST.
THIS SKETCH DOES NOT REPRESENT A FIELD SURVEY, AS SUCH.
THE DELINEATION OF LANDS SHOWN HEREON ARE AS PER THE CLIENT'S
INSTRUCTIONS.
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
CERTIFICATION:
WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE 8EST
OF OUR KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF AS PREPARED UNDER OUR DIRECTION IN JULY, 1 ~95. WE
FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION MEETS THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STAN-
DARDS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 61G17-6 (F.A,C.) ADOPTED BY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF
SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS, PURSUANT TO FLORIDA STATUTES 472027.
DAVID A. 'NHiTE. P L.S.
FLORIDA REGISTRATiOfi tW. 4044
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOCATED IN
SECTION 17, TO'w'NSHIP 21 ~OUTH PANr~[ '11 Ftl',T
SEMINOL.E COUNTY, rLlJPIDA
1m, '1'1 VI.....
'JI,';. .IlLY 1&.19tS
U.~/.lt} f1 ( IA'IIL
'Hf' vI r. f;' I..Y
Page 1-4
,..
B.
Legal Description
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A TRACT OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 21 SOUT:-i. RANGE 31 :AST DESCRISED
AS FOLLOWS:
.
COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 12, OVIEDO CROSSiNG .
PHASE 1 B. ACCORDING. TO THE ?LA T THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT SOOK
47, PAGES 80, 81, 82, AND 83 OF THE PUBLIC RECOEDS CF SEMINOLE
COUNTY, AS THE POINT OF BEGINNING;. THENCE RUN THE FOLLOWING
COURSES ,ALONG THE NORTH UNE OF SAiD. LOT 12; NORTH 72046'44' WEST,
63.09 FEET; SOUTH 63005'12" WEST, 61.20FttI; SOUTH 53050'30' EAST,
4.28 Fttl; 'SOUTH 16008~58' EAST,i5.as FEET; SOUTH 30003'21' EAST,
19.28 FEET; SOUTH 16"06'18" WEST, 18.15 FEET; SOlJTH 17013'24' EAST,
23.03 FEET; SOUTH 62056~25" WESj, 24.86 FEET; SOlJrH 65039'42" WEST,
22.91 FEET; SOUTH 40051'22' WEST, '19.28 FEET; SOUTH 14041'54" WEST,
39.45 FEET; SOUTri 07028""" WEST, 0.3.00 FEET; SOUTH 0305.4'47" EAST,
17.73 FEET; SOUTH 04032'01" WEST, 32.26 FEET; SOUTH 10023'42" EAST,
27.27 FEET; SOUTH 21025'56" EAST, 25.9.4 FEET; SOUTH 57013'53" EAST,
26.73 FEET; SOUTH 22030'24" EAST, 30.0-2 FEET; SOUTH 17032'14' WEST,
34.51 FEET; SOUTH 12034'08" WEST, 35.7.1 FEET; SOUTH, 20039'55" EAST,
50.30 FEET; SOUTH 14047'38" WEST, 33.01' Fti:l; SOUTH 38046~47" weST,
36.55 FEET; SOUTH 69023'30" WEST, 30.n FEET; SOUTH 83013'35" WEST,
31.96 FEET; NORTH 83~26'48" WEST, 29.09 FEET; SOUTH 86046'10" WEST,
122.80 FEET; NORTH 87033'11' WEST, 45.67 FEET; SOUTH 69<>2:7'35" WEST,
21.26 FEET; NOR1}i 87032'46" WEST, 146,.7' FEET; THENCE, DE?ARTiNG SAID
NORTH UNE OF tOT 12. RUN NORTH 57.024'04" EAST, 29.61 FEET; THE::iCE
RUN _. NORTH 00047'25" EAST, 484.48 FEET TO A CURVE CONCAVE
NORTHERlY; THENCE RUN WESTERLY AND THE\I NORTH@LY ALONG SAlO
CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS .lENGTH OF 750.00 FEET, A CENTRAl ANGLE OF
138048'5.4", AN ARC LS"I/GTH OF 1817.09 FEET, A CHORD LE.l\jGTri OF 1404.15
FEET, AND A CHORD 8EARJNG OF NORTH 19-016'44" WEST; TrlENCE RUN
NORT.; 43050'01" EAST, 413.30 FEET TO THE SOUTHE'''\1. Y l:.1NE OF
TUSCAWlUA UNIT 7, ACCORDiNG TV THE PlAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED.iN
?tAT BOOK 22. PAGES 46 AND 47 OF THE PUBUC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE
COUNTY, FLORIDA;', THENCE RUN ALONG THE SOUTHERLY lJNE OF SAID
TUSKAWfllA UNIT 7. SOlJrri 70000'2S". EAST, 664.21 FeET TO TriE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID. PLAT; THENCE RUN SOUTH 01007'52' EAST,
319.02 FE.:I; THENCE RUN SOUTH. 89037'4(>." EAST, 520.75 ~ET; TriENCE RUN
SOUTri 14032'19" EAST, 169.91 F...ET; THE>'iCE RUN SOUTH 71020'10" EAST,
164.74 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERlY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE
PROPOSED OVIEDO CROSSiNG ERRACE; THENCE RUN ALONG SAID ?ROPOSED
WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE THE FOUOWlNG COURSES; SOUTH 55015'44"
WEST, 200.22 r=l TO A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERlY; THENCE RON
SOUTH\NESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS LENGTH OF 950.00
FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 19006'OS", AN ARC LENGTH OF 316.71 rEET, A
CHORD LE:.i"l/GTH OF 315.25 h:el,' AND A CHORD 8EARING OF SOUTH
45042' 41' WEST; THENCE RUN SOUTH' 3600S'39" WEST, 275.09 FEET TO A
CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTBLY; THENCE RUN SOUTHWESTE.=1LY ALONG
SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS LB"I/GTri OF 800.00 FE::I, A CENTRAl A,'liGLE _
OF 17048'35", AN. ARCLENGTH OF 248.57 FEET, A OiORD LENqTH OF 247.67
FEET, AND A CHORD BEARiNG OF SOUTri 270'.15'22" WEST TO "TnE AFORESAID
NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 12 AND ThE. POINT OF BEGINNING. ,
Trl!: ABOVE DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND UES rN SEMINOLE COUNTY, R.ORlDA AND CCNT ~INS
49.551 A~ES, MORE OR LESS.. .
.
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 2001
March 26,2001
THE
VIERA
COMpANY
VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS 8185.2989 0382 .
Community Development Department
Planning Division
City of Winter Springs
1126 East State Road 434
Winter Springs, FL 32708-2799
RE: Oviedo Marketplace / City of Winter Springs
Ladies and Gentlemen:
.
The Viera Company (TVC) is the owner and developer of the portion of the
referenced project which is located in the City of Winter Springs (the ";Property").
. This letter shall confIrm that TVC has authorized Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor
& Reed, P.A. and Glatting, Jackson, Kercher, Anglin, Lopez, Rinehart, as its
attorneys and planning consultant, respectively, to file any and all applications
required by the City for purposes of (1) amending the City's Comprehensive Policy,
(2) changing the zoning designation of the Property, and (3) facilitating the adoption
of a Development of Regional Impact (DR!) Development Order for the Property.
If you should have any questions or require additional information, please call me.
Sincerely,
HE VIERA COMPANY
l0~
A. ecator, III
Vice President, Division Counsel
,
!
JAD/stb
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF BREVARD
The forgoing instrument was acknowledged before me the 26th DAY OF
MARCH 2001, by JAY A. DECATOR, III, as VICE PRESIDENT/DIVISION
COUNSEL of THE VIERA COMPANY, a Florida corporation, on behalf of the
.~<, -. : :-'>~"'7;~ corporation. Said person did not take an' ath and is personally known to me.
.:' ~ '0' \"'~. <! . ti MARY ELLEN McKIBBEN
c: " 0 "" . 7. State of FIorlda
~ -. My Coolm. ~ ~ 2m3
_, ':"::,, .;'. ,'- 1"' Mary Ell McKibben, Notary Public, State of Florida Comm.UCC
..- --, ,,'" Commiss n No: CC857629 J'o p~i.nKNOWNBYM&
, ;,
v~.;::, My Commission Expires: July 25,2003
7380 Murrell Road, Suite 201 · Viera, Florida 32940 · Telephone: (321) 242;1200 · Facsimile: (321) 253,1800
o
DID
e
1_
e
oviedomarketplace
\~~
-4~
/
/
s
@
0=
~
~
0=
D
~
Q'li)
@
g
19
@
O~
@
D
~
~~
Page 11-1
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
.
A.
INTRODUCTION
This submittal is a request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the City of Winter
Springs Future Land Use Map. The subject property, known as Parcel 14, is a 49.5-acre
parcel located near the intersection of Red Bug Lake Road and the GreeneWay on the
southeastern border of the City of Winter Springs, Florida. A location map is included
as Map A and an aerial photograph is included as Map B.
Parcel 14 is part of Phase 3 of the Oviedo Marketplace Development of Regional Impact
(DRI), which is located in three jurisdictions, the City of Winter Springs, the City of
Oviedo, and Seminole County. Parcel 14 is the only parcel within the Oviedo
Marketplace development located in the City of Winter Springs.
Parcel 14 is currently vacant, but surrounded by development on all sides, including
Phase 1 and 2 of the Oviedo Marketplace to the east and south, which are located in
Seminole County and the City of Oviedo. Single-family residential neighborhoods
within the City of Winter Springs and Seminole County are located to the north and west
of the property. These surrounding uses are depicted on Map J, Local Jurisdictional
Boundaries.
.
The development of Parcel 14 will compliment these surrounding uses. The proposed
development for the site is a mixed-use retail and office development, with a maximum
of 160,000 square feet. The DRI master plan and development program are shown on
Map H. The Master Development Plan for Parcel 14 is shown on Map H-2.
Currently, Parcel 14 has a Seminole County land use designation of Planned
Development. The purpose ofthis Comprehensive Plan Amendment is to change the
future land use designation of Parcel 14 from the Seminole County designation of
Planned Development to the City of Winter Springs' designation, Mixed Use. The
Applicant also intends to request a rezoning for Parcel 14 from the Seminole County
designation of Planned Unit Development (PUD) to the City of Winter Springs' PUD
designation.
B. PROPERTY HISTORY
Historically, Parcel 14 was within the Seminole County jurisdiction. In 1988, the parcel
was part of the D.L.I. Properties approved Development of Regional Impact (DRI). The
DRI was amended in 1994 to accommodate a regional mall and was renamed Oviedo
Crossing. Today, Oviedo Crossing is the Oviedo Marketplace. As a result of the DRI
approval, the County issued a Development Order (DO) and the property was rezoned to
Planned Unit Development (PUD) and amended to have a future land use designation of
Planned Development, with a Conservation Overlay on portions of the property,
including over 30 acres on Parcel 14. The DRI DO designated the land with the
conservation overlay for conservation.
.
The City of Winter Springs annexed Parcel 14 in 1995. No action was taken at the time
to give the parcel a City of Winter Springs zoning or future land use classification. A
Development Order was also not considered or adopted for the subject parcel.
Today, Phases 1 and 2 of Oviedo Marketplace have been completed. The regional mall
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 2001
Page II-2
.
and several out parcels have been developed. The final phase, Phase 3, is planned to
begin after several road improvements are completed. Phase 3a contains most of the
Phase 3 development and Phase 3b contains only the subject property, Parcel 14 in
Winter Springs.
The required mitigation that must be complete before Phase 3a can commence are:
1) Mitigation to the Red Bug Lake/SR 436 intersection, and
2) Mitigation to the SR 426/434 intersection or alternative improvements.
Mitigation to the Red Bug Lake/SR 436 intersection has been completed.
Phase 3b can commence when SR 426 is programmed to be four-laned from Mitchell
Hammock Road to Winter Springs Boulevard.
C. PROPOSED AMENDMENT
The most recently adopted City of Winter Springs Future Land Use Map shows Parcel
14 with no land use designation. The current zoning map reveals that the property is
currently classified as "ANNX (Annexed, Zoning Pending)." The map notes that
"Parcels designated as ANNX maintain the Seminole County zoning classification until
the appropriate comprehensive plan amendment is effective and the City's rezoning
process is complete."
.
Florida's annexation regulations dictate that the County's classifications stand until the
City amends the land use designation and rezones the property to the City's
classification. The property is therefore currently zoned PUD with a land use
classification of Planned Development. Existing zoning is depicted on Map C, and
existing future land use designations are depicted on Map D.
The Applicant proposes to amend the future land use designation from the County's
Planned Development classification to the City of Winter Spring's Mixed Use
classification. This land use is similar to the County's land use classification, will allow
the desired mix of uses to be developed on the site, and is compatible with surrounding
land uses.
D. DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Parcel 14 is part of the Oviedo Marketplace. The Oviedo Marketplace is a regional mall
with "out" parcels containing retail, restaurant, office and medical uses. The Parcel 14
development will compliment this existing development as well as provide a transition
between the mall and adjacent residential neighborhoods.
The following general land uses are proposed:
.
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 2001
Page 11-3
.
The IS. I-acre developable portion of the site is planned as a unique village-style
development with a mix of office and retail uses totaling a maximum of 160,000 square
feet. Current plans propose to locate retail uses on the ground level with office uses
located above the retail. This neighborhood-oriented development will be a welcome
addition to the City of Winter Springs community.
Over 34 acres of the site will be preserved as either a Wetlands Conservation Area or an
Uplands Conservation Area through a conservation easement dedicated to the Dovera
Community Development District. These conservation areas have already been set aside
in the Oviedo Marketplace DR! as conservation and are. protected under the DR!
Development Order from development. This conservation area is located on the western
half of the property and will provide a buffer between the residential areas and the
proposed development.
The master plan and development program for the Oviedo Marketplace is attached as
Map H. The master development plan for Parcel 14 is attached as Map B-2.
E.
DRIDEVELOPMENTORDER
.
Parcel 14 is part of the Oviedo Marketplace DR!, and is currently subject to the Seminole
County DR! Development Order. Section VII of the Development Order states that,
"this Development Order and its conditions and all Developer promises, commitments,
obligations, covenants, liabilities, and responsibilities touch and concern the Property
and shall continue to run with, follow and burden the Property." Further, the County's
Development Order states that "nothing contained within said (Settlement) agreement
subrogates any condition contained in this Development Order."
The Development Order is referenced repeatedly throughout this submittal due to its
relevance to Parcel 14. Development commitments have already been made and agreed
upon by Seminole County and the State of Florida. There is no intent at the present time
to propose any further changes to the Development Order.
The Applicant proposes at this time to submit to the City of Winter Springs a
Development Order that contains all the conditions included in the Seminole County
Development Order. The City must adopt the Development Order so that development
can proceed on Parcel 14. The Applicant also proposes to submit a PUD application to
rezone the site to include the proposed land uses, including conservation and the setbacks
and buffers contained in the Settlement Agreement described below.
The Seminole County Development Order is attached as Appendix A.
F. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
The Settlement Agreement is the agreement among the City of Oviedo, the City of
Winter Springs, Rouse-Orlando, Inc., a Maryland corporation and the Developer
pertaining to the annexation of Parcel 14 into the City of Winter Springs.
.
The purpose of the Settlement Agreement is to provide better inter-governmental
relations and coordinate planning efforts. The Agreement addresses and clarifies issues
relating to mitigation for the impacts ofthe Project on transportation facilities, and
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 200 I
Page If-4
.
details development restrictions such as setbacks and buffers, bike and pedestrian
walkway requirements, and financial benefits to the City of Winter Springs. The City of
Winter Springs and the City of Oviedo detennined that if the project is developed in
accordance with the tenns of the Agreement, then, "the project and the benefits ofthe
Project are in the public interest."
The Settlement Agreement is attached as Appendix B.
G. PROJECT TEAM
The project team includes:
Client
The Viera Company
7380 Murrell Road, Suite 201
Viera, Florida 32940
Phone: 1-321-242-1200
Fax: 1-321-253-1800
Contact: Steve Johnson
.
Planner/Proiect Manal?:er
GJatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez, Rinehart, Inc.
33 East Pine Street
Orlando, Florida 32801
Phone: 407-843-6552
Fax: 407-839-1789
Contacts: Carey Hayo
Christi Elflein
Lel?:al Counsel
Lowndes Drosdick Doster Kantor & Reed
215 North Eola Drive
Orlando, Florida 3280 I
Phone: 407-843-4600
Fax: 407-423-4495
Contacts: Hal Kantor, Esquire
Pat Rinka, Esquire
Enl?:ineer
Professional Engineering Consultants, Inc.
200 East Robinson Street, Suite 1560
Orlando, Florida 32801
Phone: 407-422-8062
Fax: 407-849-9401
Contacts: Rick Merkel
H. CONCLUSIONS
.
Oviedo Marketplace is a successful regional mall with a variety of retail and office uses located in
three jurisdictions, Seminole County, the City of Oviedo, and the City of Winter Springs. The
development of Parcel 14 as a mixed-use center within the City of Winter Springs will
City oj Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 2001
Page 11-5
.
compliment existing adjacent commercial uses and provide a transitional style development to
adjacent residential neighborhoods.
This application is a request to amend the City of Winter Springs Future Land Use Map from
Seminole County's Planned Development designation to the City's Mixed Use designation for
Parcel 14. The Developer intends to also submit an application to amend the zoning on Parcel 14
from Seminole County's Planned Unit Development designation to the City of Winter Springs'
Planned Unit Development designation. The Mixed Use and Planned Unit Development
designations correspond with the existing DRl Development Order and Settlement Agreement,
which currently regulate development on Parcel 14. The proposed retail/office uses on Parcel 14
were approved as part of the Oviedo Marketplace DRl and the uses were deemed consistent with
Seminole County's Comprehensive Plan and adjacent land uses at the time of approval.
The proposed mix of retail and office uses to be developed on Parcel 14 are compatible with
adjacent land uses and consistent with Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code, the City of
Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan, the East Central Florida Strategic Regional Policy Plan, and
the State Comprehensive Plan. The project's consistency with these policy documents is
discussed in detail in Sections III through VI.
.
.
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 2001
e
e
.
oviedomarketplace
/
@
(9
@
y
@
~
o c::J
~
(f0
b
~
Q!ii)
o c::J
~
o c::::J
~
(9
~
(f0
~
(Jc::J
b
@
c:::::J
~
~
M1J
o
9
@J
b
@
~
@b
G@
6
Y
2S
~
o c::::J
~
~
b
@
~
Q!ii)
o c::J
Q!ii)
~
@
y
~~~
III.
.
A.
.
.
Page 11/-/
CONSISTENCY WITH CHAPTER 9J-S, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE
CODE
9J-5.0055
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
"The purpose of the concurrency management system is to establish an ongoing
mechanism which ensures that public facilities and services needed to support
development are available concurrent with the impacts of such development."
The subject property is part of the Oviedo Marketplace DRl. Therefore, the property
must comply with the County Development Order, which ensures that public facilities
and services are available to serve the new development. The Winter Springs
Development Order will contain all of the provisions of the County Development Order
which are applicable to Winter Springs.
As stated in the County Development Order, the Seminole County Commission made the
conclusion that "adequate public facilities are available for Phase I, Phase 2, and Phase 3
of the Project." Phase 3 of the development plan includes development of Parcel 14.
The Development Order, as required under 9J-5.0055, ensures that the new development
will not result in a reduction in the levels of service below the adopted level of service
standards. Following is a general overview of the services to be provided for Parcel 14:
1.
Roads
The Development Order details the improvements and mitigation that are
required as a result of background traffic and Project traffic prior to the
commencement of Phase 3, including development of Parcel 14. These
improvements are all that are required through buildout ofthe DRI project.
Development of Phase 3a includes most of the Phase 3 development.
Improvements and mitigations required prior to commencement of Phase 3a are
as follows as stated in the Seminole County Development Order:
a) Red Bug Lake and SR 436 - The Developer shall pay Developer's
proportionate share of the cost of a study of improvement needs for the
specified intersections, which proportionate share shall be based on the
ratio of Project traffic to total traffic. For purposes of this Development
Order, Developer's proportionate share shall be deemed to be $75,000,
which shall constitute Developer's mitigation for the Project's impact upon
the specified intersection. Within thirty days after receipt of written notice
from either the Florida Department of Transportation or Seminole County
that such study has been authorized, Developer shall pay its proportionate
share directly to such party. (The Developer has met this obligation.)
b)
SR 434 and SR 426 - As mitigation for any impact on the intersection of
SR 434 and SR 426, Division Street shall be extended from Mitchell
Hammock Road to CR 419 in a 2-lane configuration. Pursuant to Rule 9J-
2.045(7) a Florida Administrative Code, this condition shall be deemed
satisfied if such improvement is (i) in place and operational, (ii) under
actual construction for the entire improvement, or (iii) committed for
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 200/
.
.
.
Page IIl-2
construction in the current three years of the City of Oviedo's Capital
Improvement Element. In addition, Developer shaIl conveyor cause to be
conveyed an approximately 5.04 acre site as more particularly described on
Exhibit "D" attached hereto to the City of Oviedo for use as wetland
mitigation for South Division Street. This provision shall be modified by
Seminole County in the event that the City of Oviedo modifies its
comprehensive plan with respect to Division Street.
Development of Phase 3b contains only the subject property, Parcel 14 in Wiriter
Springs. The foIlowing improvements or mitigation are required prior to
commencement of Phase 3b as stated in the Development Order:
c) SR 426 must be widened to four lanes from MitcheIl Hammock Road to
Winter Springs Boulevard. This improvement must be committed for
construction within the first 3 years of the FDOT 5 Year Work Program
prior to commencement of Phase 3b development. In the event that this
improvement is not committed for construction within the first 3 years of
the FDOT 5 Year Work Program, the Developer may proceed with
construction of phase 3 b if Developer (i) advances the funds necessary for
the construction of such improvement, or (ii) conducts a final
monitoring/modeling program in accordance with the requirements of
Paragraph l3(a) above which demonstrates that such improvement is not
required.
The status of these improvements is reported in the DRl Annual Reports.
2.
Sanitary Sewer
Seminole County is currently providing sanitary sewer service to Oviedo
Marketplace and is anticipated to be the provider of sanitary sewer service to
Parcel 14 as well. Treatment capacity wiIl be provided at the Iron Bridge
Treatment Plant for wastewater generation from the project. Gravity sewer
system improvements exist to the property boundary. Extension of the gravity
sewer system improvements within the parcel boundary will be constructed,
owned and operated by the parcel developer. Considering that Parcel 14 is within
the jurisdictional limits ofthe City of Winter Springs, it may be possible for the
sewer service to be assigned to the City of Winter Springs via a utility service
agreement between Seminole County and the City of Winter Springs.
Parcel 14 is projected to have a wastewater flow of 0.0160 MGD (million gallons
per day). This estimate was calculated assuming all 160,000 square feet of
approved development area is retail services. If a mix of uses is built, the
wastewater flow may differ.
The adopted level of service standard for sewer in Seminole County is 300
gallons per day per ERC (Equivalent Residential Connection). The estimated
wastewater flow of 0.0160 MGD for Parcel 14 is equivalent to 53.3 ERC's. The
proposed development therefore does not exceed the adopted level of service.
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 2001
Page 1lJ-3
.
The letter from the Seminole County Environmental Services Department stating
their ability to continue water and sewer service for the Oviedo Marketplace is
attached in Appendix C.
3.
Solid Waste
Florida Recycling Services, Inc. will provide off-site solid waste disposal
services transferring the project's solid waste to the Osceola Landfill owned and
operated by Seminole County. The landfill is planned in three phases and has
adequate capacity to serve the project. The landfill property extends over 6,000
acres. It is a Class I landfill with a natural clay lin.er. Phase I of the landfill is
capped and is 131 feet high. Phase II is the active landfill and is currently 73 feet
high. Phase III will tie Phases I & II together and be 270 feet high. Gas
Recovery and Leachate Removal Systems are instiilled on the site.
According to the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan, "there are
currently no deficiencies related to solid waste facilities at this time, and none are
projected based on demand through the year 2010. The solid waste disposal
facilities are currently the responsibility of Seminole County, and have adequate
capacity." (p49)
.
Parcel 14 is projected to generate 6,400 pounds per day of solid waste with a
volume of23.7 cubic yards per day. This estimate was calculated assuming all
160,000 square feet of approved development area is retail services. If the
proposed mix of uses is built, the solid waste generated may differ.
The adopted level of service standard for solid waste in Seminole County is 4.14
pounds per capita per day. The estimated solid waste generation of 6,400 pounds
per day is based on a generation rate of 4 pounds per 100 square feet per day.
Solid waste generation is therefore estimated to n6t exceed the adopted level of
servIce.
The letter from Florida Recycling Services, Inc. stating their ability to provide
solid waste collection services for the Oviedo Marketplace is attached in
Appendix C.
4. Drainage
The Dovera Community Development District (COD) was fonned to assure the
accomplishment of the intended objectives of the proposed stonnwater
management program and compliance with the objectives set forth in Chapter 29-
F-19.00 1, Florida Administrative Code. The Development Order states, "The
COD is responsible for implementing an inspection and maintenance program for
all components of the surface water management system for the Project site to
assure that the components continue to operate at their design capacities for the
life ofthe Project. The COD shall be responsible for all applicable penn it
conditions imposed with respect to the surface water management system by the
St. Johns River Water Management District."
.
The master drainage system for all of Oviedo Marketplace was designed and
pennitted through the St. Johns River Water Management District and Seminole
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 2001
Page 11l-4
.
County and meets the City of Winter Springs 25 year, 24-hour storm event LOS
standard. Please see the attached Exhibits 1-1 and 1-2 for information
concerning the master stormwater system for the DRl.
5.
Potable Water
Seminole County is currently providing water service to Oviedo Marketplace and
is anticipated to be the provider of water service to Parcel 14 as well. Existing
Oviedo Marketplace infrastructure improvements include a 10-inch looped water
main within the internal road rights-of-way connecting to a 12-inch water main
along Red Bug Lake Road. The IO-inch water main is adjacent to the Parcel 14
boundary and is fitted for service to the subject parcel. Considering that Parcel
14 is within the jurisdictional limits of the City of Winter Springs, it may be
possible for the water service to be assigned to the City of Winter Springs via a
utility service agreement between Seminol~ County and the City of Winter
Springs.
Parcel 14 is projected to have a potable water demand of 0.0160 MGD (million
gallons per day). This estimate was calculated assuming all 160,000 square feet
of approved development area is retail services. If the proposed mix of uses is
built, the potable water demand may differ.
.
The adopted level of service standard for potable water service in Seminole
County is 350 gallons per day per ERC (Equivalent Residential Connection).
The estimated potable water demand of 0.0 1 6 MGD for Parcell 4 is equivalent to
45.7 ERC's. The proposed development therefore does not exceed the adopted
level of service.
The letter from the Seminole County Environmental Services Department stating
their ability to continue water and sewer service for the Oviedo Marketplace is
attached in Appendix C.
6. Parks and Recreation
The open space, constituting over 50% of Parcel 14, will be owned and
maintained by the Dovera Community Development District (DCDD). No
master recreational facilities are planned for the site.
Currently, no recreational facilities are required to meet Level of Service. If any
residential uses are built on Parcel 14, the project will meet the City of Winter
Springs Level of Service for parks and recreation of 3.6 total acres per 1,000
population or 1.8 developable acres per 1,000 population.
7.
Mass Transit
.
The Development Order required the Oviedo Marketplace project to connect to
existing routes, employment centers and appropriate residential areas with the
LYNX service upon opening of the mall. "The Oviedo Marketplace Project will
construct stops for the service, and coordinate with LYNX." "At a minimum,
transit operations shall be adequate to attract 1 00 peak hour riders prior to Phase
3a and 200 peak hour riders at buildout."
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 2001
.
.
.
Page 111-5
LYNX Bus Route 4 currently provides direct service to the Oviedo Marketplace
Mall and currently arrives twice during the peak hour. Each bus accommodates
43 passengers. The TDP for Lynx shows that new service and re-alignment of
routes is scheduled for 2002. At that time there will then be three routes serving
the Oviedo Marketplace, providing expanded capacity.
B.
9J-5.006
FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT
"The future land use element is the designation of future land use patterns as reflected
in the goals, objectives and policies of the local government comprehensive plan
elements. "
Parcel 14 does not have a City of Winter Springs land use designation. It currently,
however, has a Seminole County land use designation of Planned Development. The
Applicant is requesting the City of Winter Springs to amend its Future Land Use Map to
The City of Winter Springs' Mixed Use land use category, a similar category to
Seminole County's Planned Development category.
The Applicant is requesting to designate the entire site to Mixed Use to accommodate the
proposed mix of uses including retail and office, to be developed on the uplands portion
of the property. Preservation of the 29.2-acre wetland conservation area and adjacen.t
upland conservation area is ensured through the Development Order and Map H, which
designates this area for conservation. The wetlands will be preserved by a conservation
easement dedicated to the Dovera Community Development District.
1.
Proposed Land Uses
The proposed Mixed Use classification for Parcel 14 will be consistent with the
surrounding land use patterns and with the City's goals, objectives and policies in
the Future Land Use Element. The proposed development's consistency with the
City's Future Land Use Element is detailed in Section IV.
Following is a list of land use patterns surrounding Parcel 14:
Jurisdiction
Future Land Use
Existing Uses
Oviedo Marketplace - Regional Mall
Oviedo Marketplace - Retail/Office
Oviedo Marketplace - Retail
Single Family Residential
Single Family Residential
NE Oviedo
E Seminole County
S Seminole County
W Seminole County
NW Winter Springs
PUD
High Intensity PO
PO
LDR
LOR
Land uses allowed within the Mixed Use land use classification and desired for
Parcel 14 include retail, office, and conservation. A development with this mix
of uses wi II offer the ideal transitional style of development between the regional
mall and the conventional commercial developments along Red Bug Lake Road
and the single family residential neighborhoods to the west and northwest of
Parcel 14. A development built in a more traditional style with office uses
located above retail uses would be transitional because it would have
characteristics of these surrounding land uses.
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 2001
Page 1Il-6
.
Development will occur on the eastern portion of Parcel 14 abutting the existing
retail and office uses. Over half of Parcel 14, located primari Iy in the western
half of the property, will be designated for conservation. The conservation
portions of the property will abut the adjacent residential uses to the northwest
and west and will serve as a buffer.
The Master Development Plan, Map H, depicts the proposed land uses,
intensities and densities for Parcel 14.
2. Land Use Analysis
The following elements were analyzed in the approved DR! to ensure that Parcel
14 is suitable for the proposed development.
a) Soils
Map G, Soils, was derived from the D.L.I. Properties Application for
Development Approval (ADA) soils map. The map identifies two
distinct soil areas on the site: swamp, which makes up the wetland
portion of the site to be preserved, and fine sand, which makes up the
upland portion of the site. The soils identified on the site include:
. Swamp
. Immokalee Fine Sand
. Rutledge Fine Sand
. . Leon Fine Sand
. Lakewood Sand
. Pomello Fine Sand
These soils are common to other developed areas of Seminole County.
The existence of these other developments, especially those in the
immediate vicinity ofthe site, confirms the suitability of these soils for
future development.
The Immokalee, Leon and Rutledge fine sand series dominate the upland
portion ofthe site, and are generally associated with transitional soils.
They are often located in nearly level tracts, as they are here, adjacent to
wet a'reas of flatwoods, and connected to low lands. This area of the site
has historically been used for farming and pasture.
b) Topography
The topography of the site is generally flat as shown on Map E.
Elevations range from 35 feet across most of the site to 40 feet on the
northern and western edge of the site.
The flat topography ofthe site makes this site ideal for development.
.
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 200]
Page 111-7
c)
Floodplain
.
No portion of the site is within the] OO-year flood-prone area as
identified by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and
as shown on Map E.
d)
Wetlands
29.2 acres of Parcel 14 are designated as a Wetland Conservation Area
on Map H. This area is not proposed to be developed. It will be
preserved through a conservation easement dedicated to the Dovera
Community Development District.
e) Native Vegetative Communities and Wildlife Habitat
Parcel ] 4 is comprised of three distinct land use covers as identified in
the D.L.I. Properties Application for Development Approval (ADA).
The land use covers are as follows:
· 617 Mixed Wetland Hardwoods
· 427 Live Oak
· 242 Sod Farm
.
These land use covers are depicted on Map F. The area with the Mixed
Wetland Hardwood designation is the area designated in the DR! for
preservation. The area indicated as Sod Farm is the most ideal for
development. It was cleared and used as a sod farm in recent history.
Pertaining to wildlife habitat on the site, in the D.L.I. Properties ADA in
1988, there was information pertaining to a bald eagle nesting on Parcel
14. Subsequent to that discussion, the nest was abandoned for more than
five years. The Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission has
determined that the restrictions relating to the eagle nest no longer apply
to the Oviedo Marketplace and issued the letter attached in Appendix D.
The DRl Development Order was amended to delete any reference to the
bald eagle nest.
.
No other endangered, threatened or species of special concern is known
to inhabit the site. To protect such species, the Seminole County
Development Order states that "except as otherwise allowable by this
Development Order, site development related activities shall not result in
the harming, pursuit or harassment of wildlife species classified as
endangered, threatened or a species of special concern by either the state
or federal government in contravention of applicable state or federal
laws. Should such species be determined to be residing on, or be
otherwise significantly dependent upon, the Project site, the Developer
shall cease all activities which might negatively affect that individual or
population and immediately notify the Florida Game and Fresh Water
Fish Commission, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the DCA,
the ECFRPC and Seminole County." "Proper protection and habitat
management, to the satisfaction of the above agencies, shall be provided
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 2001
Page II1-8
.
by the developer." Any management plan for any species classified as
endangered, threatened or as a species of special concern by the state or
federal government which may be identified on the property will be
incorporated into the Development Order upon approval by the above
agencies.
j)
Historic and Archaeological Resources
There are no known significant historical or archaeological resources
located on the site.
A letter from the Division of Historical Resources addressing the entire
DRI site is attached in Appendix C.
3. Urban Sprawl Analysis
The proposed plan amendment to Parcel 14 does not designate land uses that
would constitute urban sprawl under the Department of Community Affairs'
rules.
a)
Urban Sprawl Definition
.
Rule 9J-5.003 defines urban sprawl as follows: "Urban sprawl" means
urban development or uses which are located in predominantly rural
areas, or rural areas interspersed with generally low-intensity or low-
density urban uses, and which are characterized by one or more of the
following conditions: (a) The premature or poorly planned conversion of
rural land to other uses; (b) The creation of areas of urban development
or uses which are not functionally related to land uses which
predominate the adjacent area; or (c) The creation of areas of urban
development or uses which fail to maximize the use of existing public
facilities or the use of areas within which public services are currently
provided. Urban sprawl is typically manifested in one or more of the
following land use or development patterns: Leapfrog or scattered
development; ribbon or strip commercial or other development; or large
expanses of predominantly low-intensity, low-density, or single-use
development.
According to DCA's Rule 9J-5.006(5), the following criteria are listed as
primary indicators of sprawl:
I) Promotes, allows or designates for development substantial areas
of the jurisdiction to develop as low-intensity, low-density or
single-use development or uses in.excess of demonstrated need.
.
2) Promotes, allows or designates significant amounts of urban
development to occur in rural areas at substantial distances from
existing urban areas while leaping over undeveloped lands which
are available and suitable for development.
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 2001
Page 1J/-9
3)
Promotes, allows or designates urban development in radial,
strip, isolated or ribbon patterns generally emanating from
existing urban developments.
.
4) As a result of premature or poorly planned conversion of rural
land to other uses, fails adequately to protect and conserve
natural resource, such as wetlands, floodplains, native vegetation,
environmentally sensitive areas, natural groundwater aquifer
recharge areas, lakes, rivers, shorelines, beaches, bays, estuarine
systems, and other significant natural systems.
5) Fails adequately to protect adjacent agricultural areas and
activities, including silviculture, and including active agricultural
activities and dormant, unique and prime farmlands and soils.
6) Fails to maximize use of existing public facilities and services.
7) Fails to maximize use offuture public facilities and services.
8) Allows for land use patterns or timing which disproportionately
increase the cost in time, money and energy, of providing and
maintaining facilities and services, including roads, potable
water, sanitary sewer, storm water management, law enforcement,
education, health care, fire and emergency response, and general
government.
.
9)
Fails to provide a clear separation between rural and urban uses.
10) Discourages or inhibits infill development or the redevelopment
of existing neighborhoods and communities.
11) Fails to encourage an attractive and functional mix of use.
12) Results in poor accessibility among linked Of related land uses.
13) Results in the loss of significant amounts of functional open
space.
b) Analysis of Sprawl Issues
Development of Parcel 14 does not have indicators of sprawl for the
following reasons. Paragraph numbers below correspond to sprawl
indicators outlined above in Rule 9J-5.006(5).
1)
Development within Parcel 14 will not contain low-density
residential development nor will it be a single use community. A
mix of uses is proposed.
2)
Parcel 14 is not within a rural setting. It is essentially an infill
piece within an urban context. It is a vacant urban piece suitable
for development.
.
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 2001
Page 111-10
. 3) Parcel 14 is part of the Oviedo Marketplace development, a
planned development containing a mix of uses. It is part of a.
regional activity center and is located adjacent to an area
designated as "High Intensity Planned Development" on the
Seminole County Future Land Use Map. The plan does not take
the form of radial, strip or ribbon patterns emanating from
existing urban developments.
4) The Master Development Plan for Parcel 14 adequately protects
and conserves the site's natural resources. Over half of Parcel 14
will be preserved as a wetland conservation area.
5) Parcel 14 is surrounded by development on all sides. No
agricultural areas or activities will be impacted.
6) The proposed development of Parcel 14 will maximize the use of
existing public facilities and services. When Parcel 14 was
approved as a Planned Development, it was determined that
adequate public facilities were available to serve the project.
Seminole County committed to provide police protection and
water and sewer for the site, and the Florida Power Corporation
committed to serve the site.
7) The proposed development of Parcel 14 will maximize the use of
. future public facilities and services. For example, water and
sewer have already been stubbed out to the site and are available
for future use.
8) Development of Parcel 14 is planned as part of Phase 3 of the
Oviedo Marketplace. Public facilities and services will be easily
accessible and provided in a cost-efficient manner.
9) Parcel 14 is surrounded by development and proposed
development on all sides. This development area is clearly
separate from rural areas.
10) Amending the land use of Parcel 14 will not discourage or inhibit
infill development or the redevelopment of existing
neighborhoods and communities.
11 ) Amending the Parcel 14 land use to Mixed Use will not
discourage an attractive and functional mix of uses. Contrary, it
will encourage the desired mix of uses.
12) Accessibility to Parcel 14 is exceptional. It is part of the Oviedo
Marketplace, and is therefore linked internally to the surrounding
commercial and office uses, and is located near the intersection
of Red Bug Lake Road and the GreeneWay (SR417), a major
regional expressway.
.
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 2001
.
.
D.
.
Page Jf/-11
13)
Development of Parcel 14 will not result in a loss of significant
amounts of functional open space. Over half of the parcel will be
preserved as a Wetland Conservation Area and open space will
be owned and maintained by the Dovera Community
Development District.
c.
9J-5.OO7
TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ELEMENT
A monitoring/modeling study for Phase 3 of the Oviedo Marketplace DRl was
completed and submitted as part ofthe Notice of Proposed Change to the Oviedo
Marketplace DR! submittal in 1999. It is attached as Appendix E.
The analysis includes proposed changes to Phase I and 2 as well as all planned
development within Phase 3. The 160,000 square feet of development proposed within
Parcel 14 was part of the development program used to evaluate the traffic impact of
Phase 3. The evaluation, however, analyzed all 160,000 square feet of development as
retail' where a mix of uses including office is proposed. The proposed mix of uses will
result in less of an impact on traffic than the analyzed single use retail development. The
total number of trips, however, will not exceed 5,499 daily trips.
The report based its conclusions on the adequate facilities provisions of the adopted
ECFRPC staff guideline, the Transportation Uniform Standard Rule (9J-2.045), and the
Oviedo Marketplace Development Order. The analysis contained in the report projected
no significant and adverse impacts to roadway segments with the full build out of the
proposed Oviedo Marketplace development program other than:
(1) A significant and adverse impact to the Red Bug Lake Road and SR436
intersection;
(2) A significant and adverse impact to the SR434 and SR426 intersection; and
(3) A significant and adverse impact to SR426 from Mitchell Hammock Road to
Winter Springs Boulevard.
Improvements and mitigation of these impacts are required'and listed above under the
concurrency management discussion above. Development cannot proceed unless these
mitigation measures and/or improvements are secured and committed for completion
during the phase or subphase in which impacts occur.
9J-5.011
SANITARY SEWER, SOLID WASTE, STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT, POTABLE WATER AND NATURAL
GROUND-WATER AQUIFER RECHARGE ELEMENT
"The purpose of this element is to provide for necessary public facilities and services
correlated to future land use projections."
As stated in the County Development Order, the Seminole County Commission made the
conclusion that "adequate public facilities are available for Phase I, Phase 2, and Phase 3
of the Project." Phase 3 of the development plan includes the proposed development of
Parcel 14. Following is an analysis of the public facilities and services necessary for
Patcel 14.
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 2001
Page 1II-]2
1.
Sanitary Sewer
.
Seminole County is currently providing sanitary sewer service to Oviedo
Marketplace and is anticipated to be the provider of sanitary sewer service to
Parcel 14 as well. Treatment capacity will be provided at the Iron Bridge
Treatment Plant for wastewater generation from the project. Gravity sewer
system improvements exist to the property boundary. Extension of the gravity
sewer system improvements within the parcel boundary will be constructed,
owned and operated by the parcel developer. Considering that Parcel 14 is within
the jurisdictional limits of the City of Winter Springs, it may be possible for the
sewer service to be assigned to the City of Winter Springs via a utility service
agreement between Seminole County and the City of Winter Springs.
The Level of Service analysis is included above under the Concurrency
Management discussion.
2. Solid Waste
According to the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan, "there are
currently no deficiencies related to solid waste facilities at this time, and none are
projected based on demand through the year 2010. The solid waste disposal
facilities are currently the responsibility of Seminole County, and have adequate
capacity." (p49)
.
The Level of Service analysis is included above under the Concurrency
Management discussion.
3.
Storm water Management
A storm water management system for Oviedo Marketplace was required by the
Development Order and has since been completed. It is in conformance with the
City's land development code and St. Johns River Water Management District
Regulations.
Please refer to the Concurrency Management discussion on drainage above for
more information.
4. Potable Water
Seminole County is currently providing water service to Oviedo Marketplace and
is anticipated to be the provider of water service to Parcel 14 as well. Existing
Oviedo Marketplace infrastructure improvements include a 10-inch looped water
main within the internal road rights-of-way connecting to a 12-inch water main
along Red Bug Lake Road. The lO-inch water main is adjacent to the Parcel 14
boundary and is fitted for service to the subject parcel. Considering that Parcel
14 is witnin the jurisdictional limits of the City of Winter Springs, it may be
possible for the water service to be assigned to the City of Winter Springs via a
utility service agreement between Seminole County and the City of Winter
Springs.
.
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 200]
Page 1lI-13
.
Please refer to the Concurrency Managemeht discussion above for more
information.
5.
Natural Ground-water Aquifer Recharge
According to the ] 972 Appraisal of Water Resources in the East Central Florida
Region, the United States Geological Survey (USGS) in cooperation with the
East Central Florida Regional Planning Council (ECFRPC) has determined that
Parcel 14 is a poor recharge area.
E.
9J-S.013
CONSERVATION ELEMENT
"The purpose of the conservation element is to promote the conservation, use and
protection of natural resources. "
1. Air Quality
No direct emissions from the retail or office buildings is expected. Such
facilities, however, may attract a number of vehicles to one location. Thus, a
development such as this one, together with its nearby roadways, may encompass
locations where possible increases in ambient concentrations of certain vehicular
pollutants could occur.
.
A computerized dispersion model to predict future CO concentrations at critical
locations under worst-case conditions was performed for the Oviedo Marketplace
DRl. None ofthe 14 intersections modeled are predicted to exceed the national
I-hour standard of 35 ppm or the national 8-hour standard of 9 ppm.
Since detailed modeling shows no projected exceedances of the CO ambient air
quality standard, no mitigation measures are proposed for CO air quality reasons.
2. Surface Water Quality
Oviedo Marketplace is located in the Howell Branch Basin, a 45.5 square mile
watershed in Orange County and Seminole County. The two creeks that receive
surface water from the site are Howell Creek and Bear Creek. The headwaters of
Howell Creek originate in Lake Maitland and the headwaters of Bear Creek are
located in Bear Gully Lake. The confluence of the two creeks is approximately
two miles upstream of Lake Jesup. Waters from Lake Jesup flow into the St.
Johns River.
A storm water management system for Oviedo Marketplace was required by the
Development Order and has since been approved by permitting agencies and
constructed. The system is designed to maintain surface water quality in abutting
waters in accordance with the requirements of the St. Johns River Water
Management District (SJR WMD).
.
There are no Outstanding Florida Waters, Wild and Scenic Rivers, Florida
Aquatic Preserves or Florida Class I or II Waters, as defined in Rule 17-302 of
Florida Department of Environmental Protection, within or abutting the'site.
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 2001
.
.
.
Page 1/J-14
3.
Soils
Please refer to m.B.2.a.
4.
Native Vegetative Communities
Please refer to III.B.2.e.
5. Wildlife Habitat
Please refer to III.B.2.e.
6. Wetlands
Please refer to III.B.2.d.
F.
9J-5.014
RECREATION A..l\ID OPEN SPACE ELEMENT
The City of Winter Springs Mixed Use Land Use classification requires 20% of the site
to be open space. 34.4 acres of the 49.S-acre site will be preserved as a Wetland
Conservation Area or an Uplands Conservation Area, therefore preserving over 60% of
the site for open space.
The open space will be owned and maintained by the Dovera Community Development
District (DCDD). Currently, no recreational facilities are required to meet level of
service and no master recreational facilities are planned.
G.
9J-5.016
. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
Extensive analysis of the availability offacilities to serve the project has been conducted
through the DRI process and has been documented in the subsections above regarding
sanitary sewer, potable water, solid waste, stonnwater management, parks and
transportation.
These analyses show that adequate facilities exist or will be provided to serve the
project. The project (Parcel 14) does not require any amendments to the City's Capital
Improvements Element.
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 2001
e
~
~
c==
@b
@!)
~
o c::::J
QY1J
b
@!)
oviedomarketplace i
b
~
~
@
y
Q'lJ)
(9))
b
o c::::J
b
@b
C0l)
b
@)
~
b
o c::::J
~
~
@
~
o c::::J
y
~
~
o c::::J
~
~
b
@)
~
QY1J
o c::::J
Q'lJ)
b
@
Y
e.
.
~\W
Page /V-I
IV.
CONSISTENCY WITH CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN
.
The following is an analysis of consistency of the proposed project with the adopted City of
Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan. Where the proposed project is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan, the goal, objective or policy is shown with a statement of how the project is
consistent with them.
A. TRAFFIC CIRCULATION
Goal- Provide a road system within the City that facilitates internal traffic circulation,
assists ingress and egress from the municipal area, and accommodates through traffic
simultaneously to coordinate safely, efficiently, economically and conveniently the flow
of all modes of transportation in and around Winter Springs.
1. Objective C - Throughout the planning period, the City will coordinate the
transportation system needs with land use designations; planning for land use and
transportation is to be closely correlated by ensuring that adequate capacity is
available to accommodate the impacts of development.
Throughout the approval process for the Oviedo Marketplace DR! there was a thorough
review of transportation systems needs in coordination with land use designations.
Pedestrian and bicyclists have been accommodated. Access to mass transit has been
provided. Automobile traffic in the area will be coordinated safely, efficiently and
economically.
.
Monitoring and modeling traffic impact studies have been completed and are attached in
Appendix E for review. Transportation facility impacts from development of Phase 3,
which includes Parcel 14, are identified, and improvements and mitigation requirements
to be made prior to commencement of the phase or subphase in which impacts occurred,
are listed.
Development of Phase 3a includes most of the Phase 3 development. Improvements and
mitigations required prior to commencement of Phase 3a are as follows as stated in the
Development Order:
a) Red Bug Lake and SR 436 - The Developer shall pay Developer's proportionate
share of the cost of a study of improvement needs for the specified intersections,
which proportionate share shall be based on the ratio of Project traffic to total
traffic. For purposes of this Development Order, Developer's proportionate share
shall be deemed to be $75,000, which shall constitute Developer's mitigation for
the Project's impact upon the specified intersection. Within thirty days after
receipt of written notice from either the Florida Department of Transportation or
Seminole County that such study has been authorized, Developer shall pay its
proportionate share directly to such party. (The Developer has met this
obligation.)
b)
SR 434 and SR 426 - As mitigation for any impact on the intersection of SR 434
and SR 426, Division Street shall be extended from Mitchell Hammock Road to
CR 419 in a 2-lane configuration. Pursuant to Rule 9J-2.045(7)a Florida
Administrative Code, this condition shall be deemed satisfied if such
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 2001
.
Page IV-2
.
improvement is (i) in place and operational, (ii) under actual construction for the
entire improvement, or (iii) committed for construction in the current three years
of the City of Oviedo's Capital Improvement Element. In addition, Developer
shall conveyor cause to be conveyed an approximately 5.04 acre site as more
particularly described on Exhibit "D" attached hereto to the City of Oviedo for
use as wetland mitigation for South Division Street. This provision shall be
modified by Seminole County in the event that the City of Oviedo modifies its
comprehensive plan with respect to Division Street.
Development of Phase 3b contains only the subject property, Parcel 14 in Winter
Springs. The following improvements or mitigation are required prior to commencement
of Phase 3b as stated in the Development Order:
c) SR 426 must be widened to four lanes from Mitchell Hammock Road to Winter
Springs Boulevard. This improvement must be committed for construction
within the first 3 years of the FDOT 5 Y ear Work Program prior to
commencement of Phase 3b development. In the event that this improvement is
not committed for construction within the first 3 years of the FDOT 5 Year Work
Program, the Developer may proceed with construction of phase 3b if Developer
(i) advances the funds necessary for the construction of such improvement, or (ii)
conducts a final monitoring/modeling program in accordance with the
requirements of Paragraph 13(a) above which demonstrates that such
improvement is not required.
.
The status of these improvements is reported in the DR! Annual Reports.
2. Objective E Policy 4 - The City, shall ensure the provision and maintenance of
bicycle and pedestrian walkways to supplement collector roads between residential
areas and parks, schools, and other major attractors. Specific provisions for the
establishment and maintenance of bicycle and pedestrian walkways shall include, but
not necessarily be limited to the following:
a. The City shall review all proposed development for its accommodation of
bicycle and pedestrian traffic needs.
A safe system for cyclist and pedestrian circulation has been provided for the
Oviedo Marketplace, in the interest of safety and to promote alternative forms of
transportation.
As reported in the 2000 DR! Annual Status Report, an 8 foot sidewalklbikepath
has been constructed which connects themaII.to 426, and the Applicant has
coordinated with the local government to connect to the Rai Is-to- Trai Is as
requested. Parcel 14 uses will also accommodate bicycle and pedestrian needs in
a coordinated manner with existing facilities at Oviedo Marketplace.
b.
The revised land development regulations, to be adopted by the statutory
deadline, shall include standards to require all new developments to provide
bicycle parking spaces.
.
Bicycle parking spaces will be provided within the Parcel 14 development.
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 2001
Page IV-3
c.
Sidewalks shall be provided where feasible and appropriate along all roadways.
.
Sidewalks will be provided where feasible and appropriate to accommodate uses
on Parcel 14.
B. LAND USE
GOAL 1 - To ensure that the culmination of a City to remain predominantly a
residential component of the Or/an do Metropolitan area is guided to protect the quality
of life by defining the perimeters of residential, conservation, mixed use, and
commercial lands with spatial buffers so each use may function optimally.
1. Objective B Policy 1 - Undertake general field analysis to determine. the
options for buffers.
Field analysis has been conducted and a large wetland area has been identified on the
western portion of the property and claimed as jurisdictional by the permitting agencies.
The wetland area will be preserved and forms a natural buffer area between adjacent
residential areas and the proposed development on Parcel 14.
2. Objective B Policy 2 - Choose a buffering method according to a hierarchy
preferring use of minor environmental features and wooded areas over constructed'
barriers.
.
The natural wooded wetland area and upland conservation area will provide the buffer
between the adjacent residential areas and the proposed development on Parcel 14. As
required by the Settlement Agreement, where existing natural vegetation does not exist,
"a six-foot high masonry wall and four-inch caliper trees, planted on 40-foot centers will
be included in the buffer area shown on the Master Development Plan."
GOAL 2 - To preserve the natural drainage features within Winter Springs as assets
complementing the residential and commercial areas.
3. Objective A Policy 2 - The precise boundaries of land to be permanently
classified Conservation shall be those jurisdictional lines prescribed by State agencies
at the time offield review preparatory to engineering contiguous property for
development.
Jurisdictional wetland boundary lines are shown on Map H.
4. Objective A Policy 3 - The natural hydrological, topographical, biological and
ecological functions of natural drainage features, creeks and wetland areas lying
within the boundaries of the City shall be protected. The standards and provisions for
protection shall include, but not necessarily be limited to the following:
a.
Require projects to cluster development away from wetland areas of the site
and maintain upland buffers adjacent to wetlands. The minimum vegetative
buffer requirement shall be twenty-five (25) feet upland from the wetland area.
A larger buffer shall be required on a site-by-site basis when required to protect
the resource. The City shall follow the following criteria in determining
.
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 2001
Page /V-4
.
whether a larger buffer area is required are the extent andfunctional value of
the wetland, and the density and intensity of the proposed development.
Development on Parcel 14 will be clustered away from wetland areas on uplands
that have been impacted by past agricultural activities.
b. Require all wetlands to be accurately identified at the time of site development
review. Alteration of wetlands may be permitted, however specific mitigation
standards in accordance with policies of the St. Johns River Water
Management District will be established to ensure no net loss of wetlands
either by functional value or extent.
No alterations to wetlands are proposed at this time. The jurisdictional
boundaries have been determined by the applicable permitting agencies.
c. Environmentally sensitive areas shall be covered by an environmental
easement which restricts uses to passive recreational activities. The
environmental easement may be dedicated by plat or by a separate instrument
approved by the City.
The existing wooded wetlands on the site will be protected by a conservation
easement dedicated to the Dovera Community Development District.
f
Wetlands shall be delineated on the site plan according to DEP, SJRWMD, and
USACOE definitions, whichever standard is more restrictive. Wetlands shall
mean those areas established as jurisdictional by the above agencies.
.
The wetlands on Parcel 14 are delineated on the site plan according to limits
defined by permit documents with the St. Johns River Water Management
District and U.S. Army Corp of Engineers.
5. Objective B Policy 3 - Substantiation of the adequacy of the proposed reserved
acreage by certification of a professional environmentalist shall be included with
preliminary development plans.
The wetlands on Parcel 14 are delineated on the site plan according to limits defined by
permit documents with the St. Johns River Water Management District and U.S. Army
Corp of Engineers. A professional environmentalist determined the limits of the
permitted wetlands.
6. Objective B Policy 4 - Establish post-development monitoring procedures to
verify that construction design has accomplished the purpose of no detrimental impact
on the natural resources to be preserved.
.
A monitoring mechanism was outlined in the County Development Order. "The County
has established site review approval processes and inspection procedures for review of
developments pursuant to the Seminole County Land Development Code, which will
constitute the monitoring mechanism for assuring compliance by the Developer with this
Development Order, and the Developer shall comply with same. The Manger of the
County's Development Review Division shall be the official responsible for monitoring
compliance by the Developer with this Development Order."
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 2001
Page IV-5
.
Additionally, each year, the developer submits an annual report for the Oviedo
Marketplace DR!. This report is submitted to all affected permit agencies and includes
an assessment of the Developer's and the local government's compliance with the
conditions of approval contained in the Development Order.
7.. Objectives C - Throughout the planning period, all land development activity
shall be coordinated to ensure compatibility with topographical and soil conditions
and availability of adequate facilities and services.
Parcel 14 is generally flat, varying only five feet across the property. Soils on the site
include Swamp, lmmokalee Fine Sand, Rutledge Fine Sand, Leon Fine Sand, Lakewood
Sand, and Pomello Fine Sand. The areas considered for development are primarily made
up of the fine sands, which are suitable for development (see Map G).
GOAL 3 - Once the preceding goals are satisfied, land uses assigned to the balance of
the undeveloped property will reflect priorities of unmet needs for residential and civic-
commercial construction determined by on-going review and analysis of population
projections and residents demographic characteristics and the feasibility of commercial
growth. The siting of land uses will be amended as necessary over time to adjust to
changes in these variable factors.
.
8. Objective C Policy 1 - Mixed Use classifications are created to allow flexibility
and efficiency to development design. The revised land development regulations, to be
adopted by the statutory deadline, shall contain specific standards relating t() density
and intensity provisions for each mixed land use category, minimum requirements for
allrcation of residential, commercial, industrial and open space land uses, impervious
surface rations, and landscaping an d buffering. Development standards for the
Mixed Use classification shall include:
Density: No mixed-use development shall exceed a gross residential density of 1 0
dwelling units per gross acre.
No residential uses are planned at this time. However, if residential uses are built, the
densities will not exceed 10 dwelling units per gross acre.
Proportion of Uses: No mixed use shall have a non-residential use exceeding 50% of
the gross land area. Open space shall not be less than 20%, and public uses, utilities
or wetland conservation easements not less than 5%. Residential uses may take up to
75% of the gross land area.
Over 50% of the site will remain as open space, therefore more than 20% of the site will
be open space and the non-residential use will not exceed 50% of the gross land area.
Impervious Surface Ratio, Maximum Height and Floor Area Ratios: In the mixed use
category, for commercial uses, intensity of use shall be limited by a maximum
impervious surface ratio of 70%, a maximum height of 50 feet and a FAR of 1. O.
.
The maximum impervious surface ratio ofthe development will be significantly Jess than
70% and the FAR will not exceed 1.0. Maximum height of buildings as defined in the
Settlement Agreement "shall not exceed 35 feet within 275 feet of the boundary of the
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 2001
Page /V-6
.
adjacent residential uses, 45 feet within 300 feet of the boundary, nor 65 feet for the
remainder of the said parcels which are adjacent to Tuscawilla."
GOAL 4 - To verify that all development adheres to concurrency requirements based
on the relevant levels of service established for public services and facilities in this
plan.
9. Objective B - Prior to granting a development order for non-residential
projects, the City must be assured that at the time of impact of a new development or
phase thereof, all concurrency requirements are met and no level of service set by a
relevant jurisdiction will be degraded below its standard or before its budgeted
timetable for improvement.
No level of service will be degraded below its standard or before its budgeted timetable
for improvement. All concurrency requirements will be met.
10. Objective B Policy 1 - Determination shall be made that the traffic generated
by non-residential development can be accommodated both on-site and off-site.
The transportation impacts of development of Parcel 14 are discussed above under
Traffic Circulation. Additionally, the Traffic Monitoring and Modeling Study is
attached in Appendix E.
.
11. Objective B Policy 2 - All non-residential projects shall be landscaped
according to standards to be drawn up relating quantity of green area to intensity of
activity and including xeriscaped areas.
Parcel 14 will be landscaped according to the City's regulations.
12. Objective B Policy 3 - Adherence to regulations on sign age, lighting, and
outdoor display and storage will be determined.
Signage, lighting, and outdoor display and storage will meet the City's regulations.
13. Objective B Policy 5 - Provision shall be made for proper solid waste storage
and collection.
On-site disposal of solid waste is neither planned nor anticipated for the project. Florida
Recycling Services, Inc. will provide solid waste services to Parcel 14. A letter from
Florida Recycling Services, Jnc stating their ability to serve the site is attached as
Appendix C.
14. Objective B Policy 6 - Plans for potable water and sanitary sewer service will
have been reviewed and approved by the City, as well as for storm water management
and for irrigation through reuse of wastewater effluent.
.
Seminole County is currently providing potable water and sanitary sewer service to
Oviedo Marketplace and will provide these services to Parcel 14 as well. Concerning
potable water, Seminole County has a 12-inch water main along Red Bug Lake Road,
extending to SR 426. Sanitary sewer treatment capacity will be provided at the Iron
Bridge Treatment Plant for wastewater generation from the project. The Developer will
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 2001
Page IV-7
.
provide the wastewater collection system and lift stations, to be dedicated to Seminole
County, for collection and transmission of wastewater to existing Seminole County
facilities.
Concerning stonnwater management, the Dovera Community Development District
(CDD) has the responsibility for maintenance of the pennitted stonnwater management
system improvements and for compliance with the objectives set forth in Chapter 29-F-
19.001, Florida Administrative Code. In addition, penn its have been issued for the
master stonnwater system, which accounts for the planned development of Parcel 14.
The Development Order states, "The CDD is responsible for implementing an inspection
and maintenance program for all components of the surface water management system
for the Project site to assure that the components continue to operate at their design
capacities for the life of the Project. The CDD shall be responsible for all applicable
penn it conditions imposed with respect to the surface water management system by the
St. Johns River Water Management District."
c. CONSERVATION
GOAL - To preserve the natural environment and quality of life on which Winter
Springs is founded.
..
1. Objective A Policy 4 - Decrease usage of potable water for landscaping by
proposing alternatives to sod and water-intensive plants, such as leaving areas of
natural vegetation on homesites and commercial property and utilizing drought-
resistant plants and pervious materials such as rock and mulch. Adopt a xeriscaping
ordinance and include its requirements in revised land development regulations for all
property in the City.
According to the Development Order, irrigation practices will be "perfonned in
accordance with applicable County ordinances and policies and the Florida Department
of Environmental Protection and the St. Johns River Water Management District rules
and regulations." (p11)
2. Objective B Policy 2 - Prohibit development dependent on urban infrastructure
within land delineated to be conservation, as determined by field review by State
agencies of proposed engineering plans.
Public facilities are available and accessible to the site. The area designated as
conservation will not be developed.
3. Objective B Policy 4 - Promote dedication or conservatorship of land adjacent
to natural drainage features, by allowing such areas to be counted in calculating open
space requirements, and by establishment of provisions for conservation easements in
the land development regulations.
.
Over 50% of the site will be preserved through a conservation easement dedicated to the
Dovera Community Development District. This area is part of Parcel 14 and is proposed
to have the Mixed Use land use classification. The wetland area, therefore, will count
toward the open space calculation for the proposed development.
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 2001
Page IV-8
.
4. Objective B Policy 5 - Require conservation easements to be recorded as part
of all land development containing wildlife habitat utilized by endangered or
threatened species protected under policy C(3), 1 OO-year floodplains, and wetlands,
when outright public ownership is impractical Uses within conservation easements
shall be limited to those allowed under Chapter 704.06, F.S. No new platting shall be
approved that does not meet the natural resource protection standards of policies C(1)
through C(6).
The wetlands on Parcel 14 will be protected through a conservation easement dedicated
to the Dovera Community Development District.
5. Objective B Policy 6 - Verify all jurisdictional permits of Federal and State
agencies have been acquired before development orders are issued by the City on
properties adjacent to or including the natural drainagefeatures including SJRWMD,
FDEP and USA COE permits for wetlands and water bodies, SJR WMD permits for
storm water management, and FEMA requirements for the 1 OO-year floodplain. In
addition, the development order must be consistent with the policies for natural
resource protection of this plan, including C(1-6).
Several permits have been obtained from both the St. Johns River Water Management
District (SJRWMD) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) related to wetland
impacts on the Oviedo Marketplace project area. No wetland impacts are expected on
Parcel 14.
.
6. Objective C Policy 1 - Require conceptual engineering proposals to include
identification and mapping of natural resources within property intended to be
developed. This shall include: an inventory of plants and animals designated as
endangered, threatened or species of special concern, and associated habitat required
for the species to remain viable; and, a mapping of sand pine scrub, pine flatwoods,
long-leaf pine/turkey oak, sandhill, and scrubby flatwoods.
Natural resources, including soils and land use covers, are identified on the attached
maps.
7. Objective C Policy 2 - Ensure the following percentages of native vegetative
communities are preserved undiminished by development or replaced on the site
through mitigation plans. Upland communities identified pursuant to Policy (C)l
where endangered or threatened or species of special concern are not known to
inhabit the site shall be required to preserve or replace on-site 10% of the identified
vegetation.
Over 10% of the native vegetation on Parcel 14 will be preserved as part of the
conservation easement identified on Map H.
9. Objective C Policy 3 - Ensure wildlife habitats known to be inhabited by species
designated as endangered, threatened or species of special concern is undisturbed by
construction
.
No endangered or threatened species or species of special concern are known to inhabit
the site.
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 200 I
Page 1V-9
.
10. Objective C Policy 5 - Wetlands shall be protected through the enforcement of .
the following standards for new development and redevelopment:
a. Wetlands shall be delineated on the site plan according to DEP,
SJRWMD and USACOE definitions, whichever is stricter.
The wetlands on Parcel 14 are delineated on the site plan according to
limits defined by permit documents with the St. Johns River Water
Management District and U.S. Army Corp of Engineers.
h. No new individual lots or parcels shall be created after the adoption of
this plan that consist of such a high proportion of wetlands that
development of the lot is impossible without filling or other distwbance
of those wetlands.
No impacts to wetlands on Parcel 14 are planned.
c. Development shall be clustered away from wetlands. All projects
proposing alterations to wetlands shall submit documentation to the
City that the project cannot be redesigned to avoid alteration to
wetlands.
.
No impacts to wetlands on Parcel 14 are planned. Development will be
clustered on the uplands portion of the property considered to be barren.
d
A vegetated wetland buffer of 25 feet, depending upon site conditions,
shall be maintained between all structures and the wetland jurisdiction
line. No more than 25% of the shoreline of any development parcel
may be cleared, to provide access to the shoreline and/or view of the
lake.
A vegetated wetland buffer of25 feet will be provided along the wetland
jurisdiction line, and no more than 25% of the shoreline will be cleared.
11. Objective D Policy 1 - Monitor air quality test reports of State and regional
agencies, especially as traffic counts increase geometrically with the opening of the
Seminole County Expressway and the widening of SR 434 and Tuscawi/la Road in the
City.
An air quality analysis was conducted per DEP guidelines with no exceedences
identified. Additional information concerning traffic impacts is contained in Appendix
E, Traffic Monitoring and Modeling Study.
12.- Objective D Policy 3 - Exclude from permitted commercial and industrial uses
any operations that produce by-products or emissions inordinately toxic to land, water
or air.
.
Parcel 14 will not be developed with any land uses that produce by-products or
emissions inordinately toxic to land, water or air.
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 2001
.
-.
.
Page IV-IO
13. Objective E Policy 1 - Mining or extraction of mineral resources within the
City is prohibited
No mining or extraction of mineral resources will be conducted on Parcel 14.
14. Objective E Policy 3 - Post-development storm water run-off rates for new
development shall not exceed pre-development run-off rates.
As stated in the Development Order, "In order to assure the accomplishment of the
intended objectives of the proposed stormwater management program and compliance
with the objectives set forth in Chapter 29-F-19.001, Florida Administrative Code, the
Dovera Community Development District (DCDD) as been formed by the Developer."
The DCDD's responsibilities include the "implementation of an inspection and
maintenance program for all components of the surface water management system for
the Project site to assure that the components continue to operate at their design
capacities for the life of the Project. The DCDD shall be responsible for all applicable
permit conditions imposed with respect to the surface water management system by the
St. Johns River Water Management District." The permitted stormwater system meets
these criteria.
D.
HOUSING
GOAL - To preserve and expand the quality of life achieved over the last twenty years
through the growth of a relatively young residential community and to sustain that
success by refurbishing the original townsite and by creating neighborhoods on ihe
unbuilt land designed to respect the natural environment, the existing standard of
living in the City, and the right of persons of all means to live in the area of their
choosing.
1. Objective B Policy 4 - To ensure the compatibility of adjacent land uses, a
minimum buffer of 25 feet between adjacent residential and commercial uses, and a
50-foot buffer between residential and industrial uses shall be required These buffers
shall be designed to provide a visual barrier between residential and non-residential
uses, and to attenuate sound
The Settlement Agreement requires that "no development, including parking, roads,
buildings or other active uses (but excluding water retention and detention and drainage
facilities) will be permitted within 250 feet of the boundary between the project and
adjacent residential uses."
This 250 feet of buffer on Parcel 14 will consist primarily ofthe conservation areas
which extend beyond 250 feet from most of the property boundary. The conservation
areas will provide a natural and visual buffer between the adjacent residential areas and
the proposed mixed-use development on Parcel 14.
2. Objective C Policy 3 - In the revised land development regulations to be
adopted by the statutory deadline, all residential zoning categories will be revised with
the express intent of streamlining the permitting process to help reduce development
costs and allow flexibility in design. The revisions to the regulatory and permitting
process shall include, but not be limited to the following mechanisms:
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 2001
Page!V-ll
d
Establishing flexible zoning techniques, such as promoting cluster
development, common or zero lot line development and reduction of setback
requirements.
.
The proposed mixed-use development will take advantage of flexible regulations
such as cluster development and a reduction of setbacks.
E. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE
GOAL - To provide passive and active recreational facilities tailored to the specific
needs of a suburban residential community of ultimately 40,000 persons, coordinating
the public and private sectors to maximize the variety and dispersal of recreation sites
to be appropriate and accessible to persons of all ages, interest groups, and special
needs in a demographically complex population.
1. Objective A Policy 2 - The open space system shall include conservation areas,
natural drainage features, and upland habitats, conserved for the public use through
execution of an environmental easement, land dedication or other method The
revised land development regulations, to be adopted by the statutory deadline, shall ,
contain provisions such as, but not limited to floor area ratios, impervious surface
ratios, transfer of development rights and other standards to provide for the
conservation of upland habitat areas.
.
The proposed conservation area on Parcel 14 will include natural drainage features and
upland habitat. It will be preserved through a conservation easement dedicated to the
Dovera Community Development District.
2. Objective A Policy 3 - The privacy park system shall be comprised of facilities
built to serve individual private communities, particularly in mixed-use developments.
The conservation area, which will be preserved as open space, will be owned and
maintained by the Dovera Community Development District (DCDD). No master
recreational facilities are planned at this time.
3. Objective H Policy 1 - All mixed use and commercial developments shall
provide internal pathways for pedestrians and bicyclists.
A safe system for cyclist and pedestrian circulation has been provided for at Oviedo
Marketplace, in the interest of safety and to promote alternative forms of transportation.
As reported in the 2000 DRI Annual Status Report, an 8 foot sidewalklbikepath has been
constructed which connects the mall to 426, and the Applicant has coordinated with the
local government to connect to the Rails-to-Trails as requested. Pedestrian and bicycle
. needs will also be accommodated during development of Parcel 14.
4. Objective H Policy 2 - All nonresidential developments shall include open
space comprised of untouched natural vegetation or landscaping proportionate in
scope to the intensity of the activity, according to formulas to be established in the
revised land development code.
.
Over 50% of the site will be preserved in a conservation area through an easement
dedicated to the Dovera CDD.
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace.
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 2001
Page IV-12
.
5. Objective H Policy 3 - All local roadways, driveways, and parking areas in
nonresidential developments shall be buffered or landscaped to minimize the visual
impact of wide expanses of paving, to sustain the atmosphere of a predominantly
residential community.
All local roadways, driveways, and parking areas will be landscaped to minimize the
visual impact according to the City's regulations.
F. SOLID WASTE
GOAL - To ensure that all solid waste discarded within the City is properly managed so
that a minimum needs to be transported to the County landfill and the maximum of
reprocessable materials are diverted to recycling operations; all hazardous substances
are separated from the waste stream to be disposed safely at certified sites; and no
waste is dumped or scattered on the landscape on public or private property.-
1. Objective B Policy 1- Verify that sufficient information regarding proper
disposal of hazardous waste, both residential and commercial, is being disseminated
.
No hazardous wastes are expected at this time. However, should hazardous wastes be
present on the project site, the County Development Order states that "the Developer
shall prepare and submit a Draft Hazardous Materials Management Plan to the Florida
Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) for review and approval." The FDEP
"assures the implementation of proper hazardous materials and waste management and
disposal procedures," and ensures that the plan "includes provisions to assure the
availability of sufficient financial resources and the initiation of actions for the prompt
and effective containment and clean-up of hazardous substances subsequent to a spill or
contamination episode."
G.
POTABLE WATER
GOAL - To provide an adequate public supply, treatment, and distribution of table
water for the City of Winter Springs.
1. Objective A Policy 2 - Winter Springs shall require an Application for Service
to the Utilities Department for connection to public potable water system for all
proposed projects within the service area.
Seminole County is currently providing water service to Oviedo Marketplace and will
provide water service to Parcel 14 as well. Seminole County has a 12-inch water main
along Red Bug Lake Road, extending to SR 426.
2. Objective A Policy 4 - Winter Springs shall require the connection to the City
system and installation of a public water system.
.
Seminole County is currently providing water service to Oviedo Marketplace and will
provide water service to Parcel 14 as well since infrastructure is already in place to serve
the site. Seminole County has a 12-inch water main along Red Bug Lake Road,
extending to SR 426.
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 2001
Page IV-I3
.
3. Objective D Policy 2b - Require fifty (50%) of the land area to be xeriscaping
and native planting materials as part of the tree and landscaping ordinances, in the
land development regulations to be adopted by the statutory deadline.
The planting plan will meet the requirements of the City's tree and landscaping
ordinance.
4. Objective D Policy 3 - Winter Springs shall require the use of reclaimed water
by private landowners for landscape irrigation, where available.
To meet nonpotable water use demands, the project will use in order of priority,
according to the County Development Order, the following:
I. All treated wastewater made available to the site, which meets state
criteria for reuse, up to the entire non potable water demand.
11. Treated stonnwater; and
Ill. Nonpotable quality groundwater.
H. SAmTARYSEWER
GOAL - Provide an adequate and environmentally acceptable sanitary sewer system
for the Winter Springs Service Area.
.
1. Objective A Policy 5 - The City shall require all proposed development and
redevelopment projects within one quarter mile of a public sewer system to connect to
that system, in accordance with Chapter 381, Florida Statutes. Existing septic tank
users within 50 feet of a sanitary sewer line shall upon plan adoption be required to
connect to a sanitary sewer system within one year of notification that service is
available.
Seminole County is currently providing sanitary sewer service to Oviedo Marketplace
and will provide sanitary sewer service to Parcel 14 as well. Treatment capacity will be
provided at the Iron Bridge Treatment Plant for wastewater generation from the project.
2. Objective C Policy 16 - Winter Springs has established and shall continue the
use of minimum construction standards for all connecting and dedicated sewer
facilities, which will be regulated by the utility through the land development review
process.
The Developer will provide the wastewater collection system and lift stations, to be
dedicated to Seminole County, for collection and transmission of wastewater to existing
Seminole County facilities.
I. STORM DRAINAGE AND NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER
RECHARGE
GOAL 1 - To create an all-encompassing storm water management utility that ensures
the proper City-wide functioning of all drainage facilities, both existing and future.
.
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 2001
Page IV-14
.
1. Objective A Policy 4c - Establish, as necessary, a water quality monitoring
programfor storm water, the impact of the treated storm water discharging into surface
waters and the percolation of discharge into groundwater.
As stated in the Development Order, "In order to assure the accomplishment of the
intended objectives of the proposed stormwater management program and compliance
with the objectives set forth in Chapter 29-F-19.001, Florida Administrative Code, the
Dovera Community Development District (DCDD) as been formed by the Developer."
The DCDD's responsibilities include the "implementation of an inspection and
maintenance program for all components of the surface water management system for
the Project site to assure that the components continue to operate at their design
capacities for the life of the Project. The DCDD shall be responsible for all applicable
permit conditions imposed with respect to the surface water management system by the
St. Johns River Water Management District."
The master drainage system has been designed and permitted through the St. Johns River
Water Management District and Seminole County, and is maintained by the DCDD.
2. . Objective B Policy 1 - All existing and new development and redevelopment
projects within the City shall meet the storm water management standards of the
Florida Department of Environmental Protection, the Sf. Johns River Water
Management District and the LOS established by the City. Any exemptions,
exceptions or thresholds contained in the FDEP and SJRWMD standards shall not
apply to new or existing development and redevelopment projects in the City.
.
The proposed development will meet the storm water management standards of the
Florida Department of Environmental Protection, the St. Johns River Water Management
District and the LOS established by the City.
3. Objective B Policy 2 - In addition, with advent of the NPDES (National
Pollution Discharge Elimination System) stormwater regulations as setforth in
Paragraph 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 122.26 on November 16,
1990, all projects will have to demonstrate that application has been madefor afederal
NPDES storm water discharge permit as appropriate.
The contractor will apply for a federal NPDES stormwater discharge permit prior to
commencement of construction, if required.
GOAL 2 - To conserve and protect the environment against degradation by obtrusive
diversion of storm water contrary to the natural hydrologic cycle and to guard against
the pollution or diminution offlows to groundwater sources that replenish the aquifer
and so support all life in Winter Springs - that of both the citizens and the natural .
world and the environment.
4. Objective B Policy 1 - Establish a water quality monitoring program to
determine the level of water quality of storm water discharges into natural water
bodies.
.
The Dovera Community Development District (DCDD) is responsible for maintaining
the stormwater management system. The DCDD's responsibilities, as stated in the
. County Development Order, include the "implementation of an inspection and
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 2001
Page IV-f5
.
maintenance program for all components of the surface water management system for
the Project site to assure that the components continue to operate at their design
capacities for the life of the Project. The DCDD shall be responsible for all applicable
permit conditions imposed with respect to the surface water management system by the
St. Johns River Water Management District. This inspection and maintenance program
shall include, but not necessarily be limited to:
a) Stormwater facility operating inspections on a regular basis and following major
rainfall events for the removal of excessive sediment, debris or other flow
obstructions;
b) Routine maintenance activities (e.g. mowing, trash removal, etc.);
c) Ongoing educational programs for maintenance staff personnel regarding the
correct usage of and application rates for fertilizers and chemicals (e.g.
herbicides) within common areas that contribute runoff to the storm water
management facilities, the removal of noxious weeds and retention of desirable
aquatic vegetation, and correct procedures for other maintenance/landscaping-
related activities which have the potential for adversely affecting water quality
conditions on the Project site."
5. Objective B Policy 3b - Require the establishment of conservation easements
on jurisdictional wetlands.
The jurisdictional wetlands located on the property will be preserved through a
conservation easement dedicated to the Dovera Community Development District.
.
6. Objective C Policy 7 - Landscaping plans shall be required to use at least fifty
(50%) percent native or drought-tolerant vegetation and other xeriscape practices
which require minimal watering of landscaping.
Landscape plans will meet the requirements of the City's tree and landscaping ordinance.
7. Objective C Policy 8 - No development shall be permitted by the City until the
Applicant has demonstrated that all proper state and federal permits have been
obtained for storm water treatment.
All proper state and federal permits have been obtained for stormwater treatment.
J. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
GOAL - To ensure public facilities are in place to meet continually the level of service
standards established in this plan, by requiring funding of improvements appropriately
by developers when new growth creates need for additional infrastructure and services
and by budgeting public revenues when existing facilities require replacement or
enhancement.
.
1. Objective C - Limitation of new development approvals to only those proposals
that include construction or funding of additional facilities required to maintain
adopted levels of service established in this plan as the impact of the growth generated
occurs, or that guarantee the needed facilities will be available within timeframes
allowed in individual elements.
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 200f
Page /V-/6
.
Public facilities are available and accessible to the project.
2. Objective C Policy 2 - Upon plan adoption, public facilities and services needed
to support development shall be available concurrent with the impacts of development,
in accordance with the levels of service established in Policy C(1). Development
approvals may be phased, or development agreements executed between the City and a
developer to ensure the necessary provision ofpublicfacilities and services.
Public facilities are available and accessible to the project. Agreements have been made
with Seminole County.
.
.
City a/Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 2001
e
.-
.
oviedomarketplace
~
~
c:=::J
B
~
o c::::J
c:=::J
@
B
c:=::J
(R0
~
@
o c::::J
(9))
@)
@S
(R0
~
o c::::J
b
@
c:=::J
~
c:=::J
(R0
b
~
~
@
y
~
Q!/i)
~
~
dS
~
o c::::J
~
~
5
@
~
C0l)
o c::::J
C0l)
~
@
y
WI
Page V-}
v.
CONSISTENCY WITH EAST CENTRAL FLORIDA STRATEGIC
REGIONAL POLICY PLAN
.
The proposed development is consistent with East Central Florida Strategic Regional Policy Plan.
As stated in the County Development Order, the Seminole County Commission made the
conclusion that "the development permitted by this DevelopmentOrder is substantially consistent
with the report and recommendations of the ECFRPC."
Following is an overview of how the proposed development is consistent with the East Central
Florida Strategic Regional Policy Plan.
A. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
1. Policy 1.2 Maintain a business climate that provides opportunities for industry
growth and expansion in order to provide quality employmentfor the region's
residents without degrading the environment, quality of life, or ability of local
governments to provide services and facilities.
A mixed-use development on Parcel 14 will provide new employment opportunities
without degrading the environment, quality of life or ability of the City to provide
services and. faci I ities.
B.
NA TURAL RESOURCES
.
1. Water Resources Policy 4.2 Water conservation techniques and programs shall
be developed. Such techniques and programs may include:
1. Installation of water-conservation plumbing fvctures that are consistent
with requirements of the State Water Conservation Act (z.553.14, FS) in
new or renovated building construction.
Several types of water conservation methods and devices are available and
may be used in the development of Parcel 14. Conservation devices that may
be used in the construction of the buildings include faucet aerators, flow
restrictors, toilet dams, or ultra-low flow toilets, and low flow showerheads.
2. Water reuse and/or reclamation for irrigation, industrial use and other
non-potable water use.
The County Development Order states, "Irrigation shall be performed in
accordance with applicable County ordinances and policies and the Florida
Department of Environmental Protection and the St. Johns River Water
Management District rules and regulations." Reclaimed water, however, is
not presently available to the site.
.
2. Water Resources Policy 4.4 Nonpotable water demands should be met using
the lowest quality water available and appropriate for the intended application. In
order to reduce groundwater or surface water withdrawals, water reuse or reclamation
programs should be used whenever feasiblefor uses that do not require potable water.
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 200}
Page V-2
.
To meet nonpotable water use demands, .the project will use in order of priority,
according to the County Development Order, the following:
1. All treated wastewater made available to the site which meets state
criteria for reuse, up to the entire non potable water demand.
I I. Treated stonnwater; and
III. Nonpotable quality groundwater.
3. Floodplains Policy 4.16 Flood controlfor new development should be
accomplished by limiting fill in the 100-year floodplain. The 100-year floodplain is
defined by FEMA FIRM maps, USGS flood prone maps or other suitable means.
Where no practical alternative exists to filling in the 1 OO-year floodplain,
compensatory storage shall be provided by excavating a volume of earth equivalent to
the storage loss caused by filling in the 1 OO-year floodplain, assuming that
compensatory storage can be provided in an environmentally sound and economically
feasible manner. In no case shallfunctionally viable, regionally significant wetlands
be excavated to provide compensatory storage.
No part of Parcel 14 is within the 100-year floodplain as defined by the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Over 29 acres of the site; however, are
designated as a Wetland Conservation Area. This wetland area will not be excavated.
.
4. Wetlands Policy 4.23 Proposed activities that would degrade the function of
wetlands or deepwater habitat shall not be permitted, except where such activities are
not contrary to the public interest, and there is no practical alternative that reduces or
avoids impacts to wetlands or deepwater habitat.
The wetlands on Parcel 14 are not proposed to be impacted. They will be preserved as a
Wetland Conservation Area through a conservation easement dedicated to the Dovera
Community Development District.
5. Habitat Policy 4.28 Lands which are designated preservation or conservation
as part of any development project should be identified as such in a legal agreement
that ensures their protection in perpetuity from development or other uses
inappropriate with conservation objectives. Appropriate legal mechanisms may
include conservation easements, fee simple title acquisition, or transfer or purchase of
development rights. Conservation lands protected in this manner should come under
common ownership of a single government or private entity, and should not remain
the property of individual property owners within a development. Any legal
instrument that conveys a conservation parcels' development rights also should
identify the party responsible for managing the parcel, and should clearly state that
the parcel will be managed in a manner consistent with its intended purpose as
conservation land. Entities appropriate for owning and/or managing conservation
lands include (in order of preference): state, federal or local governments; private
conservation organizations (e.g., Trust for Public Lands, The Nature Conservancy,
Sierra Club Foundation, Audubon Society); and homeowner's or tenants associations.
.
Over 30 acres of wetlands and uplands are planned as a Wetland Conservation Area or
an Uplands Conservation Area. To ensure the lands protection from development, the
identified areas will be preserved through a conservation easement dedicated to the
Dovera Community Development District.
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 2001
.
.
.
Page V-3
6. Habitat Policy 4.31 Planning and development approval shall avoid adverse
impacts to listed speCies. Where suitable habitat on a project site is used by a listed
speCies, a site plan and a management plan to minimize harm to the speCies and to
maintain suffiCient habitat to support a viable population of the speCies on-site should
be required as a condition of development approvaL Local governments should ensure
that management plans are consistent with adopted management strategies and
recommendations or the appropriate state agency prior to approving development.
The County Development Order states that "except as otherwise allowable by this
Development Order, site development related activities shall not result in the harming,
pursuit or harassment of wildlife species classified as endangered, threatened or a species
of special concern by either the state or federal government in contravention of
applicable state or federal laws. Should such species be determined to be residing on, or
be otherwise significantly dependent upon, the Project site, the Developer shall cease all
activities which might negatively affect that individual or population and immediately
notify the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, the United States Fish and
Wildlife Service, the DCA, the ECFRPC and Seminole County." "Proper protection and
habitat management, to the satisfaction of the above agencies, shall be provided by the
developer." "Any management plan for any species classified as endangered, threatened
or as a species of special concern by the state or federal government which may be
identified on the Property will be incorporated into the Development Order upon
approval by the above agencies."
c.
TRANSPORTATION
1. Multi Modal Transportation Systems Policy 5.1 New transportation projects
should be designed to accommodate and encourage alternative forms of transportation
in order to reduce reliance on automobiles, and thereby reduce vehicular emissions
that degrade air quality.
A safe system for cyclist and pedestrian circulation has been provided for the Oviedo
Marketplace, in the interest of safety and to promote alternative forms of transportation.
The County Development Order states, "The Developer shall consult ECFRPC's and the
County's Bicycle Coordinator regarding provisions for pedestrian and bicycle facilities.
To the extent practicable, walkways and bikeways shall be constructed between the
regional mall, peripheral retail, and the residential development surrounding the Project
site, provided, however, no bikeways or pedestrian walkways shall be constructed on
land other than the Property. On-site bikeways shall be connected at Project entrances
with external bicycle systems (if any) and will be provided in accordance with the State
and County standards at the time of implementation. Appropriate signage identifying
bike routes will be installed." The Developer has met these requirements.
2. Multi Modal Transportation Systems Policy 5.5 Large non-residential
developments (including DRIs) in urban areas served by a public transit system shall
provide transit ridership amenities such as shelters, route information and schedules,
and provide incentives to encourage transit and ridesharing use, giving consideration
to the following in implementing policy:
2. Encouraging employers with over 500 persons, or groups of employers in a
common development with combined employment of over 500 persons, to
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 2001
Page V-4
.
provide bus stop shelters at convenient locations and display bus routes,
schedules and fees for employee information.
The County Development Order ensures that "transit passenger shelters and
transit parking bays shall be constructed where reasonably necessary to
augment and facilitate the operations of off-site transit facilities. The
Developer shall consult with LYNX on the design of bus facilities and
amenities including bus stops, to be located within the Project boundaries."
Further, the Development Order requires that the developer "provide shelters
and pull-out bays along the on-site transit route. Shelter locations shall be
reasonably accessible via walkways/crosswalks for pedestrian movement to
and from buildings and shall meet all regulations required under the
Americans with Disabilities Act of ]990."
The Developer notes in the June 2000 DRI Annual Status Report that
development is proceeding with this condition. A LYNX transit shelter has
been located at the mall stop.
4. Each project estimated to generate more than 1,000 average daily trips will
prepare and implement a transit and ridesharing plan thatidentifies
measures to lower automobile use while increasing use of public transit
facilities and ridesharing by employees.
.
The County Development Order ensures that the Developer will "make
known to tenants of the Project that it is served by an existing ridesharing
program operated by LYNX. Transit and current ridesharing information
shall be prominently displayed in pubic gathering areas, in employment
centers, and in commercial center areas." When the mall was opened, a
ridesharing coordinator was hired to primarily coordinate with the area transit
provider and conduct ridesharing campaigns within the Oviedo Marketp]ace
Project.
3. Multi Modal Transportation Systems Policy 5.8 Employers should be
encouraged to implement staggered work hours and shifts, with ride-sharing and
carpooling programs organizedfor use by public andprivate sector employees.
The County Development Order requires that "the Developer shall become an active and
financially supportive member of any Transportation Management Association (TMA)
which services this area." Through this TMA or individually, employers with more than
50 employees in Phase 3, which includes development of Parcel ] 4, will be required to
conduct transit and ridesharing studies to assess travel patterns and commuting needs.
Additional requirements of employers outlined in the Development Order include:
1.
Provide preferential parking to employees who participate in rideshare
programs.
Promote and encourage variable work hours and flextime participation
by on-site employers.
Make known to tenants that the Project area is served by an existing
ridesharing program operated by LYNX. Future transit and current
II.
111.
.
City o/Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 200/
Page V-5
.
ridesharing information shall be prominently displayed in all pubic
gathering areas, in employment centers and in commercial center areas.
Provide incentives, if necessary, to encourage the establishment of day
care facilities within the Project.
IV.
4. Financing Transportation Improvements Policy 5.22 Innovative transportation
financing techniques such as private and public transit partnerships and user-pay
facilities shall be encouraged including:
1. Co-locating public transit facilities and park-and-ride facilities in major
shopping centers as integral components of the public transit
infrastructure.
When the mall was opened, LYNX service became available to connect the
Oviedo Marketplace Project to existing routes, employment centers and
appropriate residential areas. The Development Order requires "the Oviedo
Marketplace Project [to] construct stops for the service, and coordinate with
LYNX."
LYNX Bus Route 47 currently provides direct service to the Oviedo
Marketplace mall and currently arrives twice during the peak hour, each bus
accommodates 43 passengers. The TDP for Lynx shows that new service and
re-alignment of routes is scheduled for 2002. At that time there will then be
three routes serving the Oviedo Marketplace, providing expanded capacity.
.
5. Financing Transportation Improvements Policy 5.23 The principle of equitable
cost participation shall guide development approval decisions, including allocation of
costs among private parties benefiting from or creating a need for transportation
improvements.
All capital improvements required through the Development Order, including sidewalks,
bicycle systems, transit stops, and internal automobile circulation were paid for by the
Developer or the Dovera Community Development District.
D. LAND USE
1. Urban Areas Policy 6.1 Comprehensive planning efforts should be based on
delineation of urban development areas for purposes of achieving compact and
contiguous urban areas having afull range of services and able to accommodate afull
range of urban land uses.
6. Maintain consistency with adopted regional goals, policies ad standards.
8. Support an attractive, functionally and physically integrated mix of land
uses including affordable housing.
.
The master development plan for Parcel 14 facilitates a compact urban form
with a full range of integrated land uses to include retail and office. A full
range of services is available to serve this project.
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 2001
Page V-6
.
The plan is consistent with the adopted regional goals, policies and standards
as detailed in this section.
2. Other Land Use Policies Policy 6.15 Land use planning should support
development patterns that minimize energy demand and maximize energy efficiency.
The following should apply in implementing this policy:
2. Direct public investment to encourage projects that will result in land use
arrangements that contribute to multi-modal movement of people and
goods; minimize auto rips, or promote transit use.
3. Arrange compatible business and residential uses in designated multi-
purpose regional centers in order to encourage walking, biking, or transit
use and to reduce the need for vehicular travel between destinations.
4. Provide a system of sidewalks 10 ensure safe, direct and convenient
pedestrian access to appropriate areas of the community.
.
The proposed development will minimize energy demand and maximize
energy efficiency through its mixed-use design. Walking and biking between
internal uses will be encouraged, not only through policy, but through
development design. Retail is proposed to be located on lower levels with
office uses located above. Addi~ionally, sidewalks and bicycle access will be
afforded within the entire Oviedo Marketplace development. Mass transit use
is available and encouraged for access to and from the project site with
existing routes, employment centers and appropriate residential areas.
E.
PUBLIC FACILITIES
1. Policy 7.5 Provision ofpublic services andfacililies shall be planned to occur
in a manner that encourages orderly growth and supports and implements a compact
and contiguous development pattern.
Public services are available to serve the project. Development of Parcel 14 will be an
efficient use of existing facilities.
2. Policy 7.11 Encourage partnerships between the public and private sectors to
identify and build needed public facilities, to share facility costs, and to avoid
duplication and fragmentation of such facilities and services. Coordination
mechanisms shall be improved between the public and private sectors in identifying,
financing, building and operating pubic facilities.
The Oviedo Marketplace is located in three jurisdictions, Seminole County, the City of
Winter Springs, and the City of Oviedo. The Applicant and each of these entities have
worked together to coordinate the use of public facilities to avoid duplication and
fragmentation of systems.
.
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 200 I
-
.-
.~
oviedomarketplace
~
(i@
=
B
@!)
~
o c::J
C01)
rs
@!)
6
@!)
b
~
~
@
y
@!)
~
(i@
~
~
@D
2S
~
dS
~
o c::J
~
~
rs
@!)
~
(01)
o c::J
C01)
rs
@
y
;'
w~
Page V1-1
.
VI. CONSISTENCY WITH THE STATE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The proposed development is consistent with the State Comprehensive Plan. As stated in the
County Development Order, the Seminole County Commission made the conclusion that "the
development of the Oviedo Marketplace Project is consistent with the achievement of the
objectives of the State Comprehensive Plan and the State Land Development Plan and therefore
will not unnecessarily interfere with those objectives."
Following is an overview of how the proposed development is consistent with the State
Comprehensive Plan.
A. WATER RESOURCES
GOAL - Florida shall assure the availability of an adequate supply of water for all
competing uses deemed reasonable and beneficial and shall maintain thefunctions of
natural systems and the overall present level of surface and ground water quality.
Florida shall improve and restore the quality of waters not presently meeting water
quality standards.
1. Policy 5 - Ensure that new development is compatible with existing local and
regional water supplies.
.
Seminole County has indicated that it has adequate water supplies to serve the project.
The letter from the Seminole County Environmental Services Department stating their
ability to continue water and sewer service for the Oviedo Marketplace is attached in
Appendix C.
2. Policy 8 - Encourage the development of a strict floodplain management
program by state and local governments designed to preserve hydrologically
significant wetlands and other natural floodplain features.
Parcel ] 4 is not located within the I OO-year floodplain and will be consistent with both
the state and local government regulations concerning floodplain encroachment.
Approximately 30 acres of wetlands will be preserved.
3. Policy 10 - Protect surface and groundwater quality and quantity in the state.
The existing on-site wetlands will be protected as a Wetland Conservation Area through
the use of a conservation easement dedicated to the Dovera Community Development
District.
4. Policy 11 - Promote water conservation as an integral part of water
management programs as well as the use and reuse of water of the lowest acceptable
quality for the purposes intended.
.
Several types of water conservation methods and devices are available and may be used
in the development of Parcel 14. Conservation devices that may be used in the
construction of the buildings include faucet aerators, flow restrictors, toilet dams, or
ultra-low flow toilets, and low flow showerheads.
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
. March 2001
Page VI-2
B.
NATURAL SYSTEMS AND RECREATIONAL LANDS
.
GOAL - Florida shall protect and acquire unique natural habitats and ecological
systems, such a wetlands, tropical hardwood hammocks, and virgin longleaf pine
forests, and restore degraded natural systems to afunctional condition.
1. Policy 1- Conserve forests, wetlands, fish, marine life, and wildlife to maintain
their environmental, economical, aesthetic, and recreational values.
Approximately 30 acres of forested wetlands will be preserved on the site. To further
ensure that wildlife is protected, the County Development Order states that "except as
otherwise allowable by this Development Order, site development related activities shall
not result in the harming, pursuit or harassment of wildlife species classified as
endangered, threatened or a species of special concern by either the state or federal
government in contravention of applicable state or federal laws. Should such species be
determined to be residing on, or be otherwise significantly dependent upon, the Project
site, the Developer shall cease all activities which might negatively affect that individual
or population and immediately notify the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish
Commission, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the DCA, the ECFRPC and
Seminole County." "Proper protection and habitat management, to the satisfaction of the
above agencies, shall be provided by the developer."
c.
ENERGY
.
GOAL - Florida shall reduce its energy requirements through enhanced conservation
and efficiency measures in all end-use sectors, while at the same time promoting an
increased use of renewable energy resources.
1. Policy 1- Continue to reduce per capita energy consumption
The proposed mix of uses to be developed on Parcel 14 will encourage walking between
uses and, therefore, lessen the number of automobile trips and decrease energy
consumption for individuals.
2. Policy 4 - Ensure energy efficiency in transportation design and planning and
increase the availability of more efficient modes of transportation.
The proposed traditional design and mix of uses for Parcel 14 will ensure energy
efficiency by promoting alternative modes of transportation. Further, a system of
sidewalks and bicycle paths will be integrated into the project, as will access to LYNX.
D. LAND USE
GOAL - In recognition of the importance of preserving the natural resources and
enhancing the quality of life of the state, development shall be directed to those areas
which have in place, or have agreements to provide, the land and water resources,
fzscal abilities, and service capacity to accommodate growth in environmentally
acceptable manner.
.
City a/Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 2001
Page VI-3
.
1. Policy 1 - Promote state programs, investments, and development and
redevelopment activities, which encourage efficient development and occur in areas
which will have the capacity to service new population and commerce.
Capacity and infrastructure exist to serve this development, which is proposed to be
compact and efficient in its form.
2. Policy 3 - Enhance the livability and character of urban areas through the
encouragement of an attractive andfunctional mix of living, working, shopping, and
recreational activities.
The proposed plan for the project creates an attractive, efficient and functional mix of
living, working, and shopping opportunities. Livability and character are key elements
of the proposed project.
3. Policy 6 - Consider, in land use planning and regulation, the impact of land
use on water quality and quantity; the availability of land, water, and other natural
resources to meet demands; and the potential for flooding.
The compact and efficient mix of uses proposed for this site provides the opportunity to
protect the forested wetlands on the parcel. All development will be clustered on
uplands that have been identified as barren, disturbed lands.
E.
TRANSPORT A TION
.
GOAL - Florida shall direct future transportation improvements to aid in the
management of growth and shall have a state transportation system that integrates
highway, air, mass transit, and other transportation modes.
1. Policy 9 - Ensure that the transportation system provides Florida's citizens and
visitors with timely and efficient access to services, jobs, markets, and attractions.
Parcel 14 is ideally located near the intersection of Red Bug Lake Road and the
GreeneWay. Florida's citizens' and visitors will have excellent access to the services
and employment opportunities offered on the site.
2. Policy 13 - Coordinate transportation improvements with state, local and
regional plans.
Transportation improvements associated with the Oviedo Marketplace have been
coordinated with the state, local, and regional plans.'
F. EMPLOYMENT
GOAL - Florida shall promote economic opportunities for its unemployed and
economically disadvantaged residents.
1. Policy 5 - Ensure that the transportation system provides maximum access to
jobs and markets.
.
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 2001
Page V/-4
.
Parcel 14 is ideally located near the intersection of Red Bug Lake Road and the
GreeneWay. Access to the employment opportunities offered on the site is maximized.
.
.
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 200/
.~
e.
.
oviedomarketplace
l0U
rs
~
[===:J
B
~
~
(i\0
l0U
~
~
~
'W~~
Page VIl-1
VII. MAPS AND PLANS
. A. Location Map
B. Site Aerial
C. Existing Zoning
D. Existing Future Land Use
E. Topography and 100 Year Floodplain
F. Land Use and Cover
G. Soils
H. DR! Master Development Plan (Revised Map H)
H-2. Site Master Development Plan
1-1. Pre-Development Drainage Conditions
1-2. Post-Development Drainage Conditions
J. Local Jurisdictional Boundaries
.
.
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 2001
\~r~
......\
I
I
I
l
\"
')
--.
')
_/\
--'. ('
[C
GLATTING
scale in Miles
I
o
3.5
March 2001
I
7
North
(t)
JACKSON
KBRCHBR
ANGLIN
LOPBZ
RINEHART
~"ll) .'!
j. d~(k t 1 Ai.
Q.J1le D"'mif~r e p a@~ - Parcel14
j~ _""",..~_.:\l..,._ _ ~~;g
-v:;;~ v,~ VV IIlLef .:llprmgs1 'l@~a
\1.i~";j ,Hi!.".,. j,
mapa
location map
KERCHER.
SCale in Feet
I
o
800 MaKn 2O:~00 <D
Date Flown: 01.00
Site Boundary - Parcel 14
Oviedo Mar1cetplace Property
[C
GLATTING
JACKSON
ANGLIN
LOPEZ
RINEHART
.. -
,. ~-""
(,'" .) ~.. \ ... ~.
Joviedomarketplace -
City of Winter Springs, Florida
- - -
/
I .
I
Parcel 14
~ mQ]:Q>b
~rl~aenal
f -
--..// .~L/
-,.....t.~-r---1' ,~ ./
/' ) _:_~~~~:"-(-,:>----' / 'L__.___l__"
__;. i...L.~ ~~;: "/ " ~- ---(' "-- ~I' --r--;r---
,.-A"" J L -~- _,1_ ---1 , /--.
_or- ----r--- , ~---, 'i---+. _ .; --,-~ I -{'--I~~--
__, .' ., '- :"_--' ~-;)- ,'.--1--, ! ,c/- ,_/~ _,' u"
'..:.__-___------~-~--~-~-~1-, T;-C~0:
"
'~, - '--
/'
I, __ ,-
.1
~~!~~-;--- .~~~
''\-'-1 ~~'-'"~~:..~ "\-
'-- I' : I , , I l -- -.
- /~:-~~~~-;U~~~-:: -~<
_, - -................. ~~L..~..... --....,1
- .............. --- .
4' ~ ~ ~-J' I ' <~~~ ~~ ~~~I
-:, ~/ ~\. ~ - -~":
1;:' /.'
I / / -
f <
/
.
..
--I
--
"'--~--..--..,_ --' -J'-' ,.-'
-- -I
__I
..-'--~----~
./ .-----
,/" /'" ---........
/ /
/ ///
//::~--".
/ ,4 ~
//
--- .
-'// ".
- ---
~-~-I
Regional Shopping Center
('.;:::. I
/J
//
"
~"""'-.,
"
J
.1
I"
.-~/
,~
I/"-~""
--j
': / /
/ / / I ,ijl
"- If /' ... /.4
/'/' ,'~" ~ / _4;::: d"
/ / ~. /; / I /' /.'
. /""\~\--- ::/ rji/' _/~/
1'1' '~i ,~
.( ,"7
, /7)) / ,/1/
==-=-----j
l I,
~.; ~::= ~ :f ! ! I'
- l // ./1 L--., / I
/. "ji, If
.11 ~ ' /'
.-;:, ~.. - - .;,'......I";.--L _.. _ - -..--'
.,--.'. _O.:c. '\ /;;-~---- ..;r--'-
~~/ )--.',,' .r/.... 'j I ;....-.../')
~-?-:-::-7-. ;._-~ -';;I~' - ----- " J.
:--....- /~<- : ~- /. -,~
I" // .#4'"
~_~: > ..' }I ~' I':
,.' " _I(/C~ : ;
-.....::i ,- _-.~' ,
:r..~..:_L..#"1 r-."l1 'I: i
I I IV
: ! j:~~: I__~."~ L
...-'1..
I
;-
L
"
Parcel 14
RetalVOIlIce
,---....,
I
I
I
,
I
I
--'--.
Site
..r ~
_~"f ,
-. --i
-- _.1
,,-
I
.---
Jr-'"-
/~ '
/ / Ii
/7 1II1
/ I
IH
I '
I
(~
,
[I
GLATTING
JACKSON
K.BRCHER
ANGLIN
LOPEZ
RINEHART
Legend:
DpUD
DR-1AAA
DR-1A
=:]A-1
.C-2
DPeD
Planned Unit Development
Single Family (13,500 sq. ft lot size)
Single Family (9,000 sq. ft lot size)
Agricultural
Retail Commercial
Planned Commercial Development
scale in Feet
I
o
source: Seminole County/March 2001
I
800 1,600
North
<D
Site Boundary - Parcel 14
Oviedo Marketplace Property
\, ~
, . .
,.~ 'I' ('
~~iedoniarketplace
City of Winter Springs, Florida
Parcel 14
m~~c
~QrFJJD)~
.
.
- r
I
[C GLATTING Legend:
JACKSON
K.BRCHER
ANGLIN
LOPEZ
RINEHART
D HIP - High Intensity Planned Development
_ PUBC - Public, Quasi-Public
D PUD - Planned Unit Development (Oviedo)
I t~jl REC - Recreation
D ROW - Right-Of-Way
_ COM - Commercial
D SE . Suburban Estates
D LOR - Low Density Residential
D MDR - Medium Density Residential
D PD - Planned Development (Seminole County)
_ Cons - Conservation
Scale in Feet
I
o
Source: Seminole County/March 1~1 ~
800 1,600 \XI
Site Boundary - Parcel 14
Oviedo Mar1<etplace Property
~-
\. '."
~. \,
,I' ,j
_J~viedomarketplace
City of Winter Springs, Florida
- Parcel 14
mQJ[Q)d
IlJf1J ]~Ianduse
(I I
If
! (
I ,
: I
ovie~oIharketplace
\
'3~
Jr'
.~
I I
__c
.
L
---
KBRCHBR
ANGLIN
scale in Feet SOurce: seminole County/March 2001 ;r...
I I \J;I
o 400 800
[I GLATTING
JACKSON
LOPBZ
Legend:
. 100 Year Floodplain
/4V Topography (ft)
. .. . Site Boundary - Parcel 14
- . .. Oviedo Marketplace Property
RINBHART
~,'~l1)(...... 1,,1
J ~~iI IJ
1ia.f!~le .'Farke~ ~ J1a~e - Parcel] 4
c ' ,"_',"1'U ,.,.f' Wln~er Smlil' Rlonda
.: ~~~>\'-,-~::V:-1 ; I; ";I.:,t,>~'~;;;~ndTr'~~;., ~:,,''':;', L 1,,",-,;;, '
. mape
topography& 1 OOyearflood
.-
-'-.-- .- :--~,.- -
---- -'---
'___-I
"
'...-.--..0
,
--~--
--..' ~--
;,--.-...- --.."-~_..:-'-;
.,r--r-
-~
,
- ----.--.........
'. ,,.\..
~,.~'
""
."'
----
"..
.,.'
"-
,..,
'.
-.......~'...
'. ,
"
"
----
~
".
,
,
.. ~."
"
....
."
.~
,-
,~",.~.....
-~....
'...... --0
.....,
-
-"
oviedomaFketplace
,"
, .''';
~
\ '..-
" t.
+.r .~\ . ..;:-
,,-"
-....
.,
".
\
,
"
"-.
242
"
. ,
..., :'
...........
.,
-.
Site
Parcel 14
RetaiVOffice
242
"'/
-""""-- ._"""
,'.' ........,
617
427
, "
, , .
'...--.1
/. /
~~-...............
~~:v" j
__ . / __ __j ~ _ _, t
l ' -', -- ' '\ /
_ _'_ _h__ - - ....\ _'r '\
__'. : ~,.~, 't ~
~_r-\ ~ ~..' ".",.ll . t'< \
\;-,:-' "', '~",/\,
~-(~)~>,_._- ''-~~=Y\~
'r'/' >/ / 'f-" ./". \, \ )--"\, 1\- ~
'\ ,- ~.. ~," "." \ f \ dI~ ;
'-, "(. / ,/ ...-----....(.\,? \. '<, '" il 3~""'"
J' ~ 1\ '" ,; \ _...-~,~ ur,,", "\
" '--... -.......(_.' j '\ /.,...../ ''-... ;;0' \
, " "",,,--,-, , -'" ~ '\ ../'''
...... / .' /"- ------ _i./'. "" '\ \.....'
-..........! I " --'--,--r r '. \\/ \ ," '\/'
.J... -.; i ' . \, \?\ \ \ /1' \
.......... . \ \ i_V. . ' /' \ \ \
,_=-,..-,,--:_.-.:-r, \ \. --7\ --' \, \~. -)~ -~~
\ .... \~ /t-\, '--;~\...--<-\\/
~, ,L- -:=;j ( ~~~~,-, ~'-'
,/
\
\.
"./
'\
\
'"
""
~
i'
,
617
~
[C
GLATTING
]ACIlSON
K.ERCHER
ANGLIN
LOPEZ
RINEHART
Scale in Feet SOurce: DU Properties DRI/March 2001 North
~ 400 8~0 <D
\e. ~.~
V )J~ \' J
~oviedoili.arketplace -
City of Winter Springs, Florida
Site Boundary. Parcel 14
- - - Oviedo MarKetplace Property
Covertypes Legend:
242 SOd Farm (Inactive)
c:::J 617 Mired wetland Hardwoods
c:::J 427 live Oak
Parcel 14
m(Q]~f
~(Q]TIl~~~~&~(Q)~~~
rketplace
[C GLATTING Legend:
JACKSON
KRaeHBR
ANGLIN
LOPEZ
IlINEHAIlT
Dsw-
_Rf-
Dlm-
.=J LdC -
~ PmB -
D LfA -
Swamp
Rutlege Fine Sand
Immokalee Fine Sand
Lakewood Sand
Pomello Fine Sand
Leon Fine Sand
SCale in Feet SOurce: DU Properties DRI/March 2001 ~
I IW
o 400 800
... . Site Boundary. Parcel 14
- - - Oviedo Mar1cetplace property
.~
\ ) \--- "-
" '(i ,'" II
". j~ / "
0~viedomarketplace
City of Winter Springs, Florida
- Parcel 14
MQJ[Q)g
~ ~J]~
.
.
.' PIR:el19
I Office
E:VOO\SCJ-Pfa3.I'\l:571l5-(M[OO ~ WS\O""_'ll'S.l.lN'H020l.OWC IIWI 05 2001 2~
d I _.......2llO1 " .
. _I!IIJ,2llllO
OVle omarket12~ace .~:Ji~1
SCAUlINFEBT EEJ CIty ofWmter Spnngs Map H
~ NORm Master Development Plan
'1 I
Legend
-...- Seminole County Jurisdiction
City of Oviedo Jurisdiction
-. - City f W tel Spnngs Iunsdiction
--'--.---.--.-.--.--.
-.------.-..-.-------
...--.--.------..-.--.
.----..-.--.-.--.--.--.
~,,=="'~=_* . 0 in . .. .
1:::::::::::::::::::::::::1 Wetland Conservation Area
LAND USE BY JURlSDlcnON
City of Oviedo
.,j
I
.I
I
I
)
NOtes:!
(I) IDcIDdoI, bat ia _1imIIIld to omce. CIIDIcal F~ IIId up to a 12O-bed
HoIpllaL Tho otlIce COIIIpOIICIIt wilbID Pm:eI 'J:1 will D!lt =-I 75.000 SF oc 7
-. !
LIIId UIO Pan:d.
RdaIl 12
RdaIl 13
TolII1
~
95.1
20.1
115.2 I
City of'Wmtcr SpriDga
LIIId UIO PIn:d
RcalIIOfIlcD 14
TolII1
('2) 'Ibo _1OCIIiOD 01 WlldaDdIto be ftIIIO'Ied in hteil6may dIImp It dlo
tImll 01 fiDIlllle plamlIDa IIId pcIIIliItiDa. ID DO -. tiowmlr. will dlo acreap to
be impKlaI =-11.0......
(3) A IIIId _ equi"faIcacJ IIlIIIh aIJowa flr dlo ardlaQp 0I11lC1i1111d cftIco _
'*- pared&. 'Ibo IIIlIIIU lpplielto cIImpI betwean PIn:da 13, IS, 16, 17,20,
21.. 2111, IIId 13-32. I'IDleIIIIl. Ill, IIId 22 require IDII1Il!lDI!mom to dlo PUn IIId
... _1lIbject to dlo maIIiL
Seminole CouDty
LIIId UIO PIn:d ~
IldIlIIIOtlIco 15 7.5 S!I.ooo SF
RcalIIOfIlcD 16 5.1 I 3OJlOOSF
RcalIIOfIlcD 17 1.2 1?.?oo SF
Offico 18 4.2 I qUKlI SF
0fIic0 III 3.3 37 750 SF
RcalIIOfIlcD 20 1.4 I ~720SF
RcalIIOfIlcD 21A 1.4 5fiR1 SF
RdaIIIOfBco 2lB liS .12&.6U SF
Offico 22 5.4 39.000 SF
RcalIIOfIlcD 23 OS 11~SF
RcalIIOfIlcD 24 2.6 ~
II.daiII01IIco 25 1.0 3 SF
II.daiII01IIco 2tI 3.0 30.662 SF
Boopi!aIt'Oaico 'J:1 Jj.6 104,981 SF
~12OBedo
IldIlIIIOtlIco 2& 1.1 11.200 SF
IldIlIIIOtlIco 29 1.2 lla2 SF
RcalIIOfIlcD 30 1.4 ~~
RdaIIIOfIIoe 31 1.6 Jj SF
RdaIIIOfIIoe 32 1.6 1 6.'700 SF
ReaidaaII.ol 36 1.3 40U
TOTAL 72.7 5llO,978 SF
~120 Bedo
400
'.'
I
LAND USE BY PHASB
=' ~
LIIId UIO PIrc:eI(.) Aaa&e s;;;;'
PHASIllallld Ib APPROVED
RdaOOftk:e 20, 21.. 2111, 23, 24, 25. 29.1 250,1!17 SF 2,200
7A 2&.. 29. 30. 31 32
Offico i"L III 22 12.!1 tUUtOO SF 300
SUBSTANI1AL OBVIATION
PHASB 212000-2002
RdaOOftk:e t~ 16. 17 101.4 1.240.000 SF 7.300
1 'J:1 Jj.6 104.!1ll1 SF (J 6SO
PHASIl3
RdaMlfIlce 13 14.. 15 46.0 4111.000 SF 1750
1-.. 'J:1 - o to 120 Beda 240
1l<GdemIa1 36 1.3 4DU -
SUMMARY OF LAND USE
I Aamlm ="""' ~..
LIIId UIO 1'IrceI(.)
RdaOOftk:e 12, 13, 14, Jj, 16, 17,2(
21.. 2111, 23, 24, 25, 26, 176.5 l,9O!1,l!17 SF 1(),950
, 2Jl29.n3132
01lIce . lR. III 22 12.!1 12UoO SF 600
BoapllnIIOflll: 'J:1 15.6 104,!111 SF 6SO
o to 120 Beda 240
RMldeDIW 36 1.3 40U -
StmmiIIW l'aIdaIIIcaow PiIa - 4ll.6
Wedaid c-vatIaD - 8!1.3
Ca1laI.o IIId CImal ~ - 20.2
~t'"' - 36.0
if-WAY - 30.8
TOTAL 431.2 12.440
. -(~.
GlArI'lNG
JACKSON
KBIl.CHER.
ANGUN
LOPEZ
lUNEBART
..... "'--,'
-,. '-.,
- . ~ ....,.,,..
-,.......~.
'-~ ._.....~-- ..
.
'-1
.
:1
'.
.
ovied'omarketplace
,.'
.
'.
"
(
....,.
-:-~;-'-=-~ _n
'.
-, (' ...
, ...
# ' ,.~
#
.... . I
~,
.",'
"
Retail/Office
\. ,,/')
" ...
"
, '
, P"'.-
......... -......- ,,,
,-- --.
... -..... ,
},\.
I
r-"--
I
I
-~
~.,.. l~...
.-:,,'
~,
'....:1' 1>.
-)
.~+...~-o- ."""
,......
'- - ,,~
j,..' . ., .:, , .-(\
....-,->--..."..__ -7.... l.~.,;;o ,/" . Q);'
-.', '''''', ?' .'
, , , ' ". , .A'\ >.
(? ,,, '\~~ 1 'i;: i
"+", ,. ~ ".,0,
r " : " iJl~ :
';'.... '. '? " 1 ~ "
~{. .' \. ~ ' , ,a,.
- .-:>.....' ."z'
," ~". -.... --c' --..., .':\ I, 0 '" . ' '
- J', " ." ,.~" " ~ '. 0 _.---
: ,,'" ~:(", "...).... '\ /;:' · ...l . ~ ,__-'-~-=. r' · .
I ~ . o'a-u ..,.;""a ...., t
" \. ' -~;:.: -. . \, ~ " ' ~~~... \ '
'.. ;.,.. ~.... \ /" .." \.1.0 \';
.,.-- "', -...~ -.... .... I . y( \ .. 'l>~ l~ \ '
..... " /', ~ ~,. \) ."" \ ,,-'--'"'' .- .---"----
::; ,.,;::;.\. '. " " \ , y A. ~ - .,~ 4. ~',,-,,"" --y"- _ ;?':!._- -- -..-. : ....
-,_":-" _.,:::~.._........, , \ t. -,:'... "".n. --.... ... ~v _ ..... .
. ".~ \-,\ - .~ -/'~ ,,/' .:\: v ..A. '. \ ~./" ,
I ? , , ..~ \ ,r'" y b' ~ \ .
. --~"~ \ \ 1 ." \ \ ...+' "-+ l,~ ,.,~ .I \.;' j
, 1 ' .p-;\' ~ ' ). y -.. \".." 't ',F L')""..""/ - '" y" I
/l' \ \. \. _) ;-....;",.->0... ~l-o- j " ~;'
iI, ~ ~~ i- ....... " ,
'.
.......1.
,",,'
~~~,........')l
"" ,
,>\ . ,-,,,>
") ., "
r"
-.~~ ,.-
/-. ,
'>--.........-.....
-............--,.~ --- ----,..- .~:-
~--,.-
I.\......._r
"\'. '
,
-"- -~---
.....~~l
,'I' I I
I'.'" II I:,-?";
'-. r"'" ."
,
:-: .>::, ~.. '....."' - -~:;::...~:.:.
400
I
800
North
<D
[C
GLATTING
JACKSON
KBRCHBR
ANGLIN
LOPBZ
RINBHART
Legend:
. -.
Site Boundary - Parcel 14
Oviedo Marketplace Property
Wetland Preservation Area
Scale in Feet
I
o
Source: P.E.CJMarch 2001
Upland Preservation Area
Upland Enhancement Area
Retail/Office 160,000 Square Feet
" ~~..
.- \\ )//: Drainage Easement
j'~ 250' Setback from Residentialm :C] ~h2
eJo;iedOinarketplace :-~;;:114 i\\~1f~ master development plan
City of Winter Springs, Florida
- "....,,-
.
~
'1lA".~. W. C
, 'If.<'\~,:,1!:i.L,?'1 . /filer SprinU' Blvd. .x
. ,''';'- ...:,--~ ,,-'lj~~1J~~~)':::: ~', \, .
,<','i""";rr'~,' ~ !il\ t,~\".._,:,q
.,...j: ~~- u '^ Q,~r
.,.,,~ i...:~" -:-,L:-. /.. :/ ',~ /- "./, .
')2::1::, _ \.,@\",j / ~, ,,~ IJ",.." PH I
-; -- I '-::: ), .' "13.~ ,1,..
, ~"Blf~~")/"-"~ .'[ @
'''':.i/ '-~~ ,,~. @
-- J r~', .... . .
/'~\ "
\. ~...~1 ........::.. I .
" ~~ --.... ,
{' @ ~)rhJ?=~~~7 ':~:;! i
-tr' (<'.' lil' l/~l Kom"I'1
l~i~it=j~Jtf\ I , . ,::[ . jJi IJ,,\ 'r-
~( 'V\. ' ~ ' ._':: 0- ~~
~~>.~ )!,t{. . ~;! ~ "'~'
'\~:~" ';, '/,,~.~-.!!.~..RO t1... ~.: ('..,.,
,.~~~~><;;~/.:.. ./ "
~~~'~):.:?!}' , t
r-:< . ;,,,'y
""^'""I -,~, \,," \:,
.'i ,...,:;',\ /~
i \- .'
7. ~ , .
!
!
If
~I
f
<.;>
~~
~.
~...
\.~,
,<
~.
SI. vin Road
"
DR.,\P.\"AGE
AREA
(,'C.)
19.8
36.4
257.2
L-__~
I 1%.8 '
45.3
B
C
P
E
F
G
II
TOTAL I
22.0
. ._.--.--0
16.7 40.2 I
4.7 18.4
2.13.9 165.0
~.J 20.2
613.0 548.7
[C
GLATTlNG
JACKSON
KERCHER
ANGLIN
LOPEZ
RINEHART
\.",~ ""~"-\"""","".'
) I \>'\
!' \ "1
' \\ )/,';.
!\,~ n
oltiedomarketplace
City of Winter Springs, Florida
..;
>
2l
_I
r
. I
-~
~ ~
----1= a
:>:
u
;;
:n
". '-~
~ (l.'nnnml'd TtlbUlnr)
~@/
~,
'\/;t,'6.1/ Hnrnlllock Rd.
,1
Jol
-;j
l.eg~nd,
@
Propeny Boundary
IJralnog. 80sln Ilh'ld.
Drlllnage Basin Deslgnallon
'I1m. of ConcClllnttlon Flow Poth
............. Direction of Ilrnlnagc ~low
D Wellond Conscr"olion Area
Nnlr: Th~ dndnagt blbln artlU und moon fhlrDClrrhtlo drpic1l'd
on lhh drolnlltl.l' map are ba,\C'd on pft-de\dnpmrnl cond!llom and
cormp<md \lflh t.\hlblwrompUlallolU pmiouJI) appmltd b)' SI,
JDhD'~ Rhrr Waltr ~I.nlllrmrnl Df~lrict IPrnnll !'t'o. ~.II7'()ZJI).
Thr drplcttd lopo(tnph,. oDd ro:d\ll,fsllt Impro\'rmrnb rtflrc1
cur""1 ~Ir (ondllloM.
Soum: Prof'.\SIonll.l Endnttrin& Coruultanu. Inc.
Scale in Feet
I
o
North
<D
1200
March 2001
I
2400
m~lgl-1
rU~D [Q)~%'1@~(Q)~m@f)1 [5)l(QJJfU(QJ~@ C(Q)rJ~~~~~~~
/.//
/'.'1'
_ . .~_J.
,~
'-3 -.
~lrrn"'U1'r Man rmim -: I
S,..~lrm J7
,
--1-'-:::. ,~
..,.
."
g
.",
..
!]j
r' ell
, "
, ,
-I-
~"I
'I
I
J !
" I
/, I
't/h'lt
f)'if, J': .I
t\"r/,_, II /;,
((II~J"// ,'~ /
: . ._J' \._..__
...l
,
",
,i'
~
{:~
. i'MJlclie1l H";;'~ "
-.~.OC. Rd.
I.'
SIOml\\Ulfr
'Inn..gl'm~'nl
S~~lrm 412
~'I
~./,
"
IIH,\INAI:U BASI,S SUMMMIY
B.\SI." IJICAI."'\(;);, VIlAK
SO. .\HP.A' IIISCllAR(;P.
h\C., R.\TIlICt'SI
3~.9 To POlld 2
~5.1 To I'ond 3
17.5 \IlI.O
~3.1 To "olld I
32.9 To "olld 6
~
,,'.r.
,","./
Slavin Road
~egend
Dn.lnage Ilusln D1rlde
Q) tJMllnage lJusln Des/gllntlnn
~ IlIrcctllll1 of Drnlnnge FlolI
OUlfall Stntcturc nnd !'Ipe
D Weiland ClIl1serl'OtlGI1 Al'ru
~ot,: An llddilional 41,1 ucm lit On~>Jle arta from lht ']mkBRld~l.'
_~ubdhWon Ii d.in<:'ted to Stonnwaur ~hmalemfnl S,'~lfm ~ 12 nf the
o,itdo tn'moln~ ~tonn\\ BIn mana~rmtnl ')'~ttm In JIO'I-dt.\rlllJ1l1'lt1l1
condItlon~
76.6 '4.6
7 (i',b ....7
10 9.7 ZJ.4
II 7.r. 16.8
12 30.1.1 165.0
13 4.7 18.4
14 4.3 %n.2
TOTAl. ~S<\.1 461.1
Sou"" PRIlmJ,lI3l r..,Jnm1"1 ColooiuDII, I...
[C GLATTING ,
JACKSON
KERCHER
ANGLIN
LOPEZ
RINEHART
SCale in Feet
I
o
1200
March 2001
I
2400
North
<D
\, ~~,
I \'
r \~ i~1/
}~~ ,
oYledOtnatketplace
City of Winter Springs, Florida
m~gl-2
~(Q)~~~ lQ)@%7@]lQ)[P)ffi@TI!J [Q) J~JfU:QJ~}@ ClQ)fJ~J~~'(gUl)~
.
.
.
J
J
'i
,
,
~~r-~M
_'9
0fIice
Legend
D City of Oviedo
D Seminole County
D City of Winter Springs
oviedomarket:glace ill
SCAUlINFBIrr EB Map J . Local Jurisdictional
~200 NOImI Boundaries
[C
GLATTING
JACKSON
KERCHER
ANGLIN
LOPEZ
RINEHART
~~~~_l."l"'"
.
.
I
~
i1
I
" I
\
\
..
, '--.,,"-.
..~.,~...
".
""-....-
......--......
- -----
~--
@wD@@J@marketplace
---~
,.....-
/
/
~'l~ ~ ~
VIII. APPENDIXES
.
A.
Seminole County Development Order
B. Amended Settlement Agreement
C. Service Agreement Letters
1. Water and Sewer
2. Solid Waste
3. Archaeological
D. Eagle Nest Abandonment Letter
E. Traffic Studies
.
.
Page VlII-1
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 2001
.
.
Appendix A
Seminole County Development Order
.
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 200 I
SEMINOLE COUNTY
~o'1o<.,A
}J~ ,,~~
cA
c
~
THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED
.
SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DEVELOPMENT ORDER
OVIEDO MARKETPLACE (FORMERLY Kl'JOWN AS OVIEDO CROSSING)
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the State of Florida, as expressed in Chapter'380, Florida Starutes, to protect
the narural resources and environment of the state, facilitate orderly and well planned development, and protect the
health, welfare, safety and quality ofHfe of the residents of the state; and
WHEREAS, the State of Florida has established land and water management policies to guide and
coordinate local decisions relating to growth and development, and has determined that such policies should. to the
maximum possible extent, be implemented by local governments through existing processes for the guidance of
growth and development, and has also determined that all the existing rights of private property shall be preserved in
accord with the constindions of the State of Florida and the United States; and
WHEREAS, the Development of Regional Impact review program has been established by the State of
.
Florida in recognition that certain development projects will, because of their character, magnirude or location, have
a substantial effect on the health, safety or welfare of the citizens of more than one county; and
WHEREAS, DLI Properties, (nc., a Florida corporation, filed an original Application for Development
Approval entitled the "DLI Properties ADA" dated July IS, 1988 and additional information dated October 3, 1988
and December 12, 1988 (hereinafter together referred to as the "Original ADA"); and
WHEREAS, Seminole County (hereinafter sometimes referred to as the "County") issued a development
order in cOMection with the Original ADA dated March 10, 1990, and recorded Man:h 20, 1990, in Official Records
Book 2162, Page 1612, Public Records of Seminole County, Florida (hereinafter referred to as the "Original
Development Order"); and
WHEREAS, the Project as described in the Original ADA was modified in connection with the filing of a
Notification of Proposed Change in 1993 and pursuant to which the County issued the First Amendment to
. Development Order dated June 2, 1993 and recorded June 30, 1993 in Official Records Book 2608, Page 117,
Public Records of Seminole County, Florida (hereinafter referred to as the "First Amendment"); and
E\03458\COrTcs\nopc-final clean count)' 3" amend do-November
WHEREAS, the Original Development Order and the First Amendment shall be jointly referred to as the
"First Development Order;" and
.
WHEREAS, the First Development Order set forth certain conditions with respect to the development of
certain property in Seminole County as described on Exhibit "A" (hereinafter referred to as the "Property"); and
WHEREAS, the First Development Order contemplated that the Property would be developed into a mixed
use project as contemplated in the Original ADA (which, as modified herein shall hereinafter be referred to as the
"Oviedo Marketplace Project" or the "Project", as generally reflected on Map H (Master Development Plan)
attached hereto as Exhibit "B"); and
WHEREAS, the Viera Company, a Florida corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Developer") whose
address is Post Office Box 257, Oviedo, Florida 32765 is the successor in interest to DLI Properties, Inc. and had the
authority to and did seek a substantial deviation of the First Development Order with respect to the Project on the
Property, all in accordmlce with Section 380.06(19), Florida Statutes; and
WHEREAS, the County issued a Substantial Deviation Development Order for Oviedo Crossing dated
September 12, 1995 and recorded October 27, 1995 in Official Records Book 2985, Page 1730, of the Public
Records of Seminole County, Florida (the "Substantial Deviation Development Order"); and
.
WHEREAS, subsequently, the Developer annexed a portion of the Project into the City of Oviedo; and
WHEREAS, with respect to that portion of the Project annexed into the City of Oviedo, the City of Oviedo
issued that certain City of Oviedo Substantial Deviation Development Order for Oviedo Crossing dated June 3, 1996
and recorded September 18, 1996 in Official Records Book 313 1, Page 16\ 0, of the Public Records of Seminole
County, Florida (the "City Development Order''); and
WHEREAS, the Developer has the authority and in August 1997 did file a Notification of Proposed
Change to a Previously Approved Development of Regional Impact with respect to the Project on the Property in
accordance with SectionJ80.06(l9), Florida Statutes; and
--
WHEREAS, the County issued a First Amended and Restated Substantial Deviation Development Order
for Oviedo Marketplace (fonnerly Oviedo Crossing) dated December 16, 1997 and recorded February II, 1998 in
Official Records Book 3369, Page 1077, of the Public Records of Seminole County, Florida; and
.
E\03458\Corres\nopc.final clean county 3" amend do-November 2
.
.
.
WHEREAS, the Developer has the authority and in April 1998 did file a Notification of Proposed Change
to a Previously Approved Development of Regional Impact with respect to the Project on the Property in accordance
with Section 3 80.06( 19), Florida Statutes; and
WHEREAS, the County issued a Second Amended and Restated Substantial Deviation Order for Oviedo
Marketplace (formerly Oviedo Crossing) dated August 31, 1998 and recorded October 15, 1998 in Official Records
Book 3516, Page 1672. of the public records of Seminole County, Florida; and
WHEREAS, the Developer has the authority and in August of 1999 did file a Notification of Proposed
Change to a Previously Approved Development of Regional Impact with respect to the Project on the Property in
accordance with Section 3 80.06( 19), Florida Statutes1 for the pw-pose of adopting this Third Amended and Restated
Substantial Deviation Development Order (the "County Development Order"); and
WHEREAS, the Developer's signators below are authorized agents of the Developer;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ordered and resolved by the Board of County Commissioners of
Seminole County that,based upon the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the Oviedo Marketplace Project is
approved pursuant to Section 380.06. Florida Statutes, subject to the following terms and conditions to which the
Developer agrees:
SECTION I. 'RECIT ALS
The above recitals are true and correct and form a material part of chis Development Order.
SECTION II. FINDINGS OF FACT
I. In November, 1994, the Developer filed the Application for Development Approval for a
Substantial Deviation DR! then known as the Oviedo Crossing Project pursuant to Section 380.06, Florida Statutes,
relating to the Property. In December, 1994, the Developer filed a First Sufficiency Response. The Application for
Development Approval and First Sufficiency Response are incorporated herein by reference.
2. In August 1997, the Developer tiled a Notitication of a Proposed Change to a Previously
Approved Development of Regional Impact with respect to the Project on the Property in accordance with Section
380.06( 19), Florida Statutes.
3.
In April. 1998, the Developer filed a Notification of a Proposed Change to a Previously Approved
Development of Regional Impact with respect to the Project on the Property in accordance with Section 380.06 (19),
E\OJ458\Corres\nopc-final clean county )'" amend do-November )
Florida Statures.
4. In August, 1999, the Developer filed a Notification of a Proposed Change to a Previously
Approved Development of Regional Impact with respect to the Project on the Property in accordance with Section
.
380.06 (19), Florida Statutes.
5. The Developer is the Owner and has the authority to file the ADA (as hereinafter defmed) and
obtain a Development Order with respectto the Property in accordance with Section 380.06, Florida Statutes.
6. The Project shall be developed in accordance with the infonnation, data, plans and commitments
contained in the Oviedo Crossing Development of Regional Impact Application for Development Approval and
supplemental infonnation incorporated herein by reference unless otherwise directed by the conditions enumerated
below. For the purpose of this condition, the Application for Development Approval ("ADA") shall consist of the
following items:
a. DLI Properties Application for Development Approval and Transportation Appendix
dated July 15, 1988 and Drainage Appendix dated June, 1988; and
-.
b.
and
c.
d.
e.
DLI Properties Additional infonnation dated September, 1988, and December 12, 1988;
.
Oviedo Crossing Application for Development Approval dated November, 1994; and
Oviedo Crossing Response to Request for Additional Information dated December, 1994;
Additional information provided by letter from John Rinehart of Glatting Jackson
Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart dated February 24, 1995;
f. Technical Memorandum - Oviedo Crossing Access to State Road 426 dated May, 1995;
g. Notification of a Proposed Change dated August, 1997;
h. Notification of a Proposed Change dated April, 1998; and
I. Notification of a Proposed Change dated August, 1999.
7.
The Property does not lie within an Area of Critical State Concern.
The development of the Oviedo Marketplace Project will not unreasonably interfere with the
.
8.
E\034S8\COm:s\nopc-linal clean counry 31d amend do-November 4
achievement of the objectives of the State Land Development Plan applicable to the area. Further, the development
of the Oviedo Marketplace Project is consistent with the State Comprehensive Plan.
.
9.
The development of the Oviedo Marketplace Project is consistent with the Seminole County
Comprehensive Plan and will be consistent with the Land Development Code of Seminole County.
10. The ADA has been reviewed by and recommendations for approval have been received from the
East Central Florida Regional Planning Council (the "ECFRPC"), pursuant to Section 380.06, Florida Statutes,
which after balancing the identified regionally significant impactS associated with each of the six criteria of
subsection 380.06( 12)(a), Florida Statutes, recommended to the County that the Oviedo Marketplace Substantial
Deviation' DR! be approved subject to specific conditions.
II. The ADA has been reviewed by and recommendations for approval have been received from the
Seminole County Planning and Zoning Commission sitting as the Local Planning Agency.
12. All public hearings as required by Section 380.06, Florida Statutes, have been duly noticed and
held.
13.' Simultaneously with submittal of the Application for Development Approval, the Developer
submitted to Seminole County a proposed amendment to the Seminole County Comprehensive Plan to change a
. portion of the future land use element from Higher Intensity Planned Development (transitional) to Higher Intensity
Planned Development (Core).
14. The proposed development consists of the following:
.
E\03458\Com:slnopc-finaJ clean county J'" amend do-November 5
SUMMARY OF APPROVEDIPROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Oviedo Marketplace Substantial Deviation
.
Retail Services/Office
419.000 SF
46.0
1,750
Hos ital 4)
Oto120Beds
240
Residential
4 DU
1.3
N/A
Note:
( I ) Includes a hospital related wellness center.
(2) Includes, but not limited to, Office. Clinical Facilities, and up to 120-bed Hospital.
(3) Phase 2 includes a Regional Shopping Center with approximately 1.200,000 SF of gross leasable area. This is
approximately equivalent to 1,450.000 SF of gross floor area.
(4) The hospital structure for 120 beds may contain approximately 170.000 square feet. The 120-bed hospital may
be exchanged with office/clinical use in Phase :2 based upon traffic impact with a like amount of development
transferred into Phase 3.
.
Retail Services/Office 1.909.197 SF 176.5 10,950
Office 126,800 SF 12.9 600
HospitaVOffice 104,981 SF 15.6 650
o to 120 Beds 240
Residential 4 DU 1.3
Stormwater Ponds/ Borrow Pits 48.6
Wetland Conservation 89.3
Canals and Canal Easements 20.2
Open Space 36.0 --
Right-of-Way 30.8
TOTAL +/-431.2 12.440
.
E'.034S8ICorres'.nopc.tinal clean county 3'. amend do-November 6
.
.
.
a. Estimated Total Gross Daily Trip Ends
1.
Phase I - 23,420 ADT
ii. Phase 2 - 43,502 ADT
iii. Phase 3 - 26,632 ADT
TOTAL 93,554 ADT
Estimated Total Net External Daily Trips Ends (including capture) - 82,341 ADT
b. Water supply provided by Seminole County
c. Wastewater service provided by Seminole County
d. Solid waste disposal provided by Seminole County
e. -. Fire and police protection provided by the City of Oviedo
The foregoing land uses shall be subject to substitution for alternate land uses in accordance with the
Equivalency Matrix set forth on Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced (the
"Equivalency Maaix"). At least thiny (30) days before the Developer proposes to make an allowable land use
locational exchange between approved office use and retail use pursuant to the Equivalency Matrix, the Developer
shall notify the City of Oviedo, Seminole C;;tnty, the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council and the
. I .
Florida Department of Community Affairs of said election and provide each party with cumulative information
!
concerning any such exchanges to date and dontirmation that office uses and retail uses have not exceeded the
I .
maximum allowable by phase and cumulatively for each use. In addition, the DRl Annual Report shall include
information indicating the cumulative use of this land use locational exchange pursuant to the Equivalency Manix.
Notwithstanding anything set forth herein to the contrary, total office'square footage and retail square footage
exchanged pursuant to the Equivalency Matrix shall not exceed the maximum allowed as specified in the Substantial
Deviation Criteria set forth in Chapter 380(19), Florida Statutes.
SECTION III. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
Based upon the Findings of Fact and the Conditions of Approval hereinafter set forth, the County
Commission makes the following Conclusions of Law:
E\03458\Corres\nopc-/inal clean county ).. amend do-November 7
1. The development of the Oviedo Marketplace Project is consistent with the achievement of the
objectives of the State Comprehensive Plan and the State Land Development Plan and therefore will not
unnecessarily interfere with those objectives.
.
1. The development pennined by this Development Order is substantially consistent with the report
and recommendations of the ECFRPC.
3. The development of the Oviedo Marketplace Project is consistent with the Seminole County
Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and with the Seminole County Land Development Code, and adequate public
facilities are available for Phase I, Phase 1 and Phase 3 of the Project.
SECTION IV. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF DEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDED
BY THE EAST CENTRAL FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL
I. General Conditions.
a. Development of Phases la and Ib of the Oviedo Marketplace Project was previously
approved development pursuant to Development Order 89-312. Portions of those phases are under construction and
portions of those phases have already been completed. all in accordance with the Original ADA. Development of
Phases 1 a and Ib shall be completed in accordance with the conditions of approval set forth in the Original ADA and
the First Development Order.
.
b. Development of Phase 2 and Phase 3 of the Oviedo Marketplace Project shall proceed in
accordance with the ADA, subject to the tenns and conditions for approval contained in this Development Order.
The terms and conditions of the ADA are incorporated herein by this reference and made a part hereof as if fully set
forth herein; provided. however, if the tenns or conditions of the ADA conflict in any way with the tenns or
conditions of this Development Order, then the tenns and conditions in this Development Order shall prevail as to
Phases 2 and j.
c. Development of Phases 2 and 3 of the Oviedo Marketplace Project shall proceed in
accordance with the Notice of Concurrency Review Test Results #95-0008 issued by Seminole County.
Specifically:
As to Phase 2. the Developer recognizes that an unconditional Certificate of Concurrency will not be issued
without payment offacility fees and that failure to pay said fees for some or all of Phase 2 within two (2) years from
the date of the Substantial Deviation Development Order adoption by the County shall result in a loss of facility
.
E\OJ458\CllrTeSlnOpc-final clean county JM amend do-November 8
.
.
.
reservation rights under the Seminole County Concurrency Management System for such unpaid portion(s) of Phase
:!. In the event of loss of facility reservation rights, the unpaid portions of Phase 2 shall be subject to meeting the
requirements of Seminole County's Concurrency Management System prior to issuance of any further Development
Orders or permits by the County for such continued development.
As to Phase 3, following issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the Phase 2 Regional Shopping Center,
~
and prior to initiation of any constrUction a\=tivity within Phase 3, the Developer shall conduct traffic monitoring and
-- . -.-..-------------
modeling and potable water/sanitary ,"~e~~L9~l!11~mL~d h~ulic evaluations for the cwnulative completed
____ ._ -_______._...____.r...'..~_______._. ...-.-...-.-------~
development at that time. Such studies, including results, recommendations and updated PrQjections of Phase 3
--- . -- \. - - -~.. - - ...-:-.--
impacts shall be submitted to Seminole County along with an application for an updated/amended Concurrency
Review for Phase 3. Seminole County acknowledees receipt nfrhe for~g"q!~g items. The Developer recognizes that
. .. ------
an unconditional Certificate of Concurrency will not be issued without payment of facility fees and that failure to
pay said fees for some or all of Phase 3 within two (2) years from the adoption of this County Development Order
by the County shall ~sult in a loss of facility reservation rights under the Seminole County Concurrency
Management System for such unpaid portion(s) of Phase 3. In the event of loss of facility reservation rights, the
unpaid portions of Phase 3 shall be subject to meeting the requirements of Seminole County's Concurrency
Management System prior to issuance of any further Development Orders or permits by the County for such
continued development
d. The Developer shall comply with any and all impact fee ordinances in place at the time of
any "application for a building pennit.
e. Certain portions of the Oviedo Marketplace Project including, without limitation, Parcels
12, 13 and 34 as identified on Map H (Master Development Plan) attached hereto as Exhibit "B", are contained
within the boundaries of the City of Oviedo. The City Developm~nt Order issued by the City of Oviedo as the
government of jurisdiction controls the development of said Parcels 12, 13 and 34. This Development Order applies
only to those portions of the Oviedo Marketplace Project which are contained within unincorporated Seminole
County.
2.
Archaeological Protection Requirements. Project constrUction personnel shaH be notified, through
posted advisories or other methods, of the potential for artifact discoveries on the site and to report suspected
findings to the Project manager. In the event of discovery of artifacts of historical or archaeological significanc:
E'.034S8\COrTeSlnopc-final clc:IJ1 county 3'- 3ITIcnd do-November 9
during Project construction. the Developer shall stop construction at the site of discovery and notify the County and
the Division of Historic Resources of the Florida Deparanent of State. From the date of notification. construction
shall be suspended within a 100 foot radius of the site of discovery for a period of up to 120 days to allow evaluation
.
of the site.
3. Wj!dlife Protection. Except as otherwise allowable by this Development Order, site development
related activities shall not result in the harming, pursuit or harassment of wildlife species classified as endangered.
threatened or a species of special concern by either the state or federal government in contravention of applicable
state or federal laws. Should such species be determined to be residing on, or be otherwise significantly dependent
upon, the Project site, the Developer shall cease all activities which might negatively affect that individual or
population and immediately notify the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, the United States Fish and
Wildlife Service, the DCA, the ECFRPC and Seminole ~ounty. Proper protection and habitat management, to the
satisfaction of the above agencies, shall be provided by the Developer. "Harming" and "harassment" as used in this
condition shall be defined in the same manner as "harm" and "harass" respectively are defined in 50 CFR Section
17.3.
4. Gopher Tortoise Protection. Mitigation of gopher tortoise impacts has heretofore been
accomplished by relocation to another site in a manner that is acceptable to the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish
.
Commission and consistent with their applicable guidelines. Said plan is embodied in that certain Gopher Tortoise
Relocation Agreement between A. Duda & Sons, Inc. and the St lohns River Water Management District dated
November 13, 1991, which is incorporated herein by reference.
5. Eagle Management Plan. The conditions set forth in Section II, Paragraph 4(g) of the Original
Development Order with respect to the eagle management plan are hereby deleted in their entirety. The nest was
destroyed by natural occurrence and the eagles have abandoned the nest and the nest has been inactive for a period
of time as judged by the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission and the United States Fish and Wildlife
Service to formally declare the nest abandoned.
6. Nonpotable Water Needs. To meet the nonpotable water use demands of the Property, the Project
shall use, in order of priority:
a. all treated wastewater made available to the site which meets state criteria for reuse, up to
the entire nonpotable water demand;
b.
treated stonnwater; and
.
.'
E\034S8\CotTeS\nopc-finaJ cle3l1 county J" amend do-November 10
c. nonpotable quality groundwater unless otherwise directed by the County, Florida
Department of Environmental Protection. the St. Johns River Water Management District. or other jurisdictional
. regulatory agency. If lower quality water is not available to meet the entire irrigation needs of the site. then potable
water may be used for those portions of the site having a deficient source so long as the use of potable water
otherwise complies with aU applicable government restrictions.
7. Irrigation. Irrigation shall be performed in accordance with applicable County ordinances and
policies and the Florida Deparnnent of Environmental Protection and the St Johns River Water Management
District rules and regulations.
8. Surface Water Man~g~~nt..sy~_~_~. In order to assure the accomplishment of the intended
objectives of the proposed stormwater management program and compliance with the objectives set forth in Chapter
29-F-19.001, Florida Administrative Code, the Dovera Community Development District ("COD") has been formed
by the Developer pursuant to Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, and has. as part of its responsibilities. caused the
implementation of an .iaspection and maintenance program for all components of the surface water management
system for ~e Project site to assure that the components continue to operate at their design capacities for the life of
the Project. The COD shall be responsible for all applicable permit conditions imposed with respect to the surface
.
water management system by the St Johns River Water Managem.ent District. This inspection and maintenance
program shall include. but not necessarily be limited to:
a. Storm water facility operating inspections on a regular basis and following major rainfall
events for the removal of excessive sediment, debris or other flow obstructions;
b. Routine maintenance activities (e.g., mowing. trash removal, etc.);
c. Ongoing educational programs for maintenance staff persoMel regarding the correct
usage of and application rates for fertilizers and chemicals (e.g. herbicides) within common areas that contribute
runoff to the stormwater management facilities, the removal of noxious weeds and retention of desirable aquatic
vegetation. and correct procedures for other maintenance/landscaping-related activities which have the potenti~J for
adversely affecting watet..quality conditions on the Project site.
9. Affordable Housing.
. a. The Developer has demonstrated that there is an adequate housing supply to meet the
demand for the very low and low income employee households for this Project. In order to ensure that an adequate
E\OJ4S8\Corres\nopc.linal clean county Jill amend do-November II
supply of housing continues to exist or is provided during the life of the Project, prior to the start of development of
Phase 3a. the Developer shall recalculate the demand for affordable housing based upon acmal employees hired in
all previous phases and estimated employees for the phase to be entered. The Developer shall also re-inventory the
available housing supply. Both analyses shall use methodologies that are adopted by rule by the Florida Depamnent
of Community Affairs ("FDCA" or "DCA") at the time of the analyses. [f no such rule has been adopted, the
Developer shall use a housing methodology approved by the DCA, the ECFRPC and Seminole County.
.
The Developer shall be responsible for mitigating any deficiencies for Phases 2 and 3, as determined by the
analysis done prior to beginning Phase 3. Mitigation for each phase shall reflect any cumulative surplus housing
provided by the Developer as well as cumulative unmitigated demand. Should the future analysis show a need to
mitigate the housing impacts of the Project, the Developer must do one or more of the following within a ten mile or
twenty minute commute of the Proje~t site (whichever is closer):
b. Build affordable housing units;
c.
"
them affordable;
d.
e.
Seminole County.
Buy down unaffordable housing units through donations or other mechanisms to make
.
Rehabilitate vacant substandard housing units to create adequate affordable units; or
Implement any other alternative that is acceptable to the DCA, the ECFRPC and
The Developer's proposed mitigation shall be approved by the DCA, ECFRPC and Seminole County and
shall be included in this Development Order by amendment. All housing provided for mitigation must be available
or guaranteed commitments made to assure that the needed housing will be available in accordance with the
Adequate Housing Uniform Standard Rule set forth in Rule 91-2.048, Florida Administrative Code, or such other
alternatives as are acceptable as set forth in subparagraph (iv) above. The Developer shall report on the success of
the mitigation plan and shall provide sufficient documentation to demonstrate this success in the DRl annual report.
No non-residential development shall be permitted if mitigation needs have not been fully met or committed in
accordance with this paragraph.
10.
Hazardous Materials. Should hazardous materials/wastes be present on the Project site then the
.
E'.034S8\Corres\nopc-final cle:ln county]nl amend do-November 12
Developer shall prepare and submit a Draft Hazardous Materials Management Plan to the Florida Department of
Envjrorunental Protection "FDEP" for review and approval. This condition will be considered met if the FDEP
.
determines that the Draft Hazardous Material Management Plan meets the following criteria: Assures the
implementation of proper hazardous materials and wastes management and disposal procedures, and includes
provisions to assure the availability of sufficient fInancial resources and the initiation of actions for the prompt and
effective containment and clean-up of hazardous substances subsequent to a spill or contamination episode.
"Hazardous materials" are those for which the notification of the FDEP is required under Chapter 17-30, Florida
Administrative Code.
All medical facilities and medical offices on the site shall be subject to a separate hazardous
materials/waste plan. The plan shall include, but not be limited to: a) hazardous materials; b) hazardous wastes; c)
bio-hazardous wastes; and d) radioactive wastes. At a_minimum, the plan shall provide for an inventory process,
handling and disposal procedures, responses to spills or other uncontrolled releases of materials/wastes, control of
hazardous gas and vapors and routine training of all staff and shall permit the participation by all generators and
handlers on the Oviedo Marketplace site. The plan shall be approved by FOEP and the DCA and shall be included
in this Development Order by amendment, which amendment shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of a
. building permit for any medical facility, medical office or other use expected to handle or generate medical related
hazardous material/wastes. Such an amendment shall be presumed to not constitute a substantial deviation of this
Development Order under Section 380.06( 19), F.S. if the hazardous materials/waste plan has received approval by
FDEP prior to the time that the amendment is proposed.
11. Natural Resow:c~ air quality condition set forth in paragraph 4 (a) of the Original
----
Development Order is hereby incorporated by reference in totality provided that the reference to the ADA shall be
deemed to refer to the information, data, plans and commionents contained in the documents referenced in Section II
paragraph three (3) of this Development Order.
12. Transportation: Project Phasing. For the purpose of the transportation conditions, the total Oviedo
Marketplace DR! shall be divided into and limited to the following phases, based upon peak hour trip ends or total
average daily trip ends (based upon the current ITE Trip Generation manual), whichever comes first.
.
E\034S8\COI'TCS\nopc-tinal clean county ]011 amend do-November 1J
la& Ib ~.002 2.002 23,420 23.420 I .
(existing &a proved)
2 (2002) 4.060 6,062 43.502 66.922 :
(includes mall)
3a (2005) I. 482 7,544 17,.HO 84.332
3b (2005) 856 8,400 9.222 93,554
I. The estimated net external daily aip ends for Phase 1 is 20.454.
2. The estimated ne[ external daily trip ends for Phase 2 is 38,288 or 58,742 cumulatively for Phases 1 and 2.
3. The estimated net external daily trip ends for Phase] is 23,399 or 82.341 cumulatively.
13. Transportation: Monitoring and Model1ng.
a. Seminole County acknowledges that the Developer has completed a monitoring/modeling
program for Phase 3. ~or to the initiation of Phase 3b, the Developer may, at its option pursuant to Paragraph
-------~.
15(n) below, conduct a final monitoring/modeling program. Said program shall ascertain the level of service
("LOS") on facilities where the combined traffic from the Oviedo Marketplace Project is estimated to contribute an
.
amount of traffic greater than or equal to five percent (5%) of the adopted LOS roadway service volume. The
methodology of the monitoring/modeling program shall be agreed upon by the ECFRPC, the City of Oviedo
(government of jurisdiction), Seminole County (government of jurisdiction), City of Winter Springs (government of
jurisdiction), Orange County, the Florida Deparanent of Transportation ("FDOr'), the DCA and the Developer,
with LYNX being included in an advisory role only. All studies and monitoring/modeling programs shall be
consistent with the then current ECFR,PC rules, procedures and criteria. The depth of each monitoring and modeling
effort shall be similar to that required within a DRl Application for Development Approval but shall be compatible
with the requirements of Seminole County's Concurrency Management System as it relates to facilities within
Seminole County (or the government of jurisdiction with respect to a particular portion of the Project site). In the
event that all parties cannot come to agreement on the methodology, the ECFRPC and the County shall be the final
arbiters, with the County's decision being fInal as it relates to County facilities (Le., facilities located within the
limits of Seminole County) and the ECFRPC's decision being fInal as it relates to all other facilities.
b. The following list of facilities indicates those roadways within the study area which were
.
analyzed for full buildout of the Oviedo Marketplace Project. The facilities to be monitored/modeled for Phase 3
E'.034S8\Corres\nopc-final clClll1 county ]01 3lI1end do-November 14
.
.
.
may include. but shall not be limited to, those segments of the regional roadways within the following list and one
segment beyond where the Oviedo Marketplace Project is estimated to contribute a cumulative amount of tratlic
greater than or equal to five percent (5%) of the adopted LOS service volume, based on the modeling of the buildout
of the Project. The LOS standard and service volumes shall be in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan for the
applicable jurisdiction where the roadway segment is located. The LOS standard and service volumes for roads on
the Florida Intrastate Highway System will be in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations. The analyzed
facilities will include signalized intersections and segment analyses of collector and higher classified roadways and
interchange ramps.
The ECFRPC, FDOT, Seminole County, City of Oviedo, City of Winter Springs, Orange County and
LYNX shall have the right to make reasonable requests for additional information from the Developer to verify
adherence to these provisions. The Developer shall SUpply adequate information toward compliance with these
requirements.
Candidate Roadwavs for MonitorineIModeling Study
Horatio A venue
US 17-92 to Thistle Lane
Aloma A venue (SR 426)
US 17-92 to Lakemont Avenue
Lakemont A venue to SR 436
SR 436 to Goldenrod Road (SR 551)
Goldenrod Road (SR 551) to Howell
Branch Road
Howell Branch Road to Tuskawilla Road
Tuskawilla Road to GreeneWay
GreeneWay to Dean Road
Dean Road to Chapman Road
Chapman Road to Slavia Road
Slavia Road to Mitchell Hammock Road
Mitchell Hammock Road to Winter Springs
Boulevard
Howell Branch Road
Thistle Lane to Lake Howell Road
Lake Howell Road to SR 436
SR 436 to Dike Road
Dike Road to Dodd Road
Dodd Road to Aloma Avenue (SR 426)
Dike Road
Howell Branch Road to Dodd Road
Dodd Road to Tuskawilla Road
Slavia Road
Red Bug Lake Road to Aloma A venue (SR 426)
West Broadway Street (SR 426)
Winter Springs Boulevard to Lake Jessup
Drive
Lake Jessup Drive to SR 434
Red Bug Lake Road
SR 436 to Eagle Circle
Eagle Circle to Nodding Pines Way
Nodding Pines Way to Dodd Road
Dodd Road to Tuskawilla Road
Tuskawilla Road to Slavia Road
Slavia Road to Site Entrance (South)
Site Entrance (South) to Site Entrance (West)
Site Entrance (West) to Site Entrance (East)
Site Entrance (East) to the GreeneWay
Greene Way to Aloma A venue (SR 426)
Geneva Drive (CR 426)
CR 419 to Lockwood Road
Lockwood ROaQ to Seminola Woods Road
Mitchell Hammock Road
Aloma Avenue (SR 426) to SR 434
SR 434 to Lockwood Road
Chapman Road
SR 426 to SR 434
GreeneWay
SR 50 to University Blvd.
University Blvd. to Aloma Avenue (SR 426)
E\03458\Corres'.nopc-finaJ clc:1n county 301 3I11cnd do-November IS
S~minola Boulevard
US 17-92 to Lake Drive
Lake Drive
Seminola Blvd. to Tuskawilla Road
CR419
SR 434 to Lockwood Road
Lockwood Road to Old Chuluota Road
Semoran Boulevard (SR 436)
University Boulevard to Aloma Avenue (SR 426)
Aloma A venue (SR 426) to Howell Branch Road
Howell Branch Road to Lakemont Avenue
Lakemont A venue to Red Bug Lake Road
Red Bug Lake Road to Kawanee Trail
Kawanee Trail to Oxford Road
Oxford Road to US 17-92
SR 50 to University Boulevard
Goldenrod Road (SR 551)
SR 50 to University Boulevard
University Boulevard to Aloma Avenue (SR 426)
Dodd Road
Howell Branc~.Road to Dike Road
Dike Road to Red Bug Lake Road
Tuskawilla Road
Aloma Avenue (SR 426) to Dike Road
Dike Road to Red Bug Lake Road
Red Bug Lake Road to Lake Drive
Lake Drive to Winter Springs Boulevard
Winter Springs Boulevard to SR 434
Old Lockwood Road
McCulloch Road to Seminole Creek Drive
Seminole Creek Drive to Little Econ River
Little Econ River to Mitchell Hanunock
Road
Mitchell Hammock Road to CR 419
CR 419 to CR 426
McCulloch Road
SR 434 to Old Lockwood Road
Aloma A venue (SR 426) to Red Bug Lake Rd.
Red Bug Lake Road to SR 434
SR 434 to Lake Mary Boulevard
.
Dean Road
SR 50 to University Boulevard
University Boulevard to McCulloch Road
McCulloch Road to Aloma Avenue (SR 426)
Rouse Road
SR 50 to University Boulevard
SR 434
SR 50 to University Boulevard
University Boulevard to Corporate Boulevard
Corporate Boulevard to McCulloch Road
McCulloch Road to Chapman Road
Chapman Road to Alafaya Woods
Boulevard
Alafaya Woods Boulevard to Mitchell
Hammock Road
Mitchell Hammock Road to Aloma Avenue
(SR 426)
Aloma Avenue (SR 426) to the GreeneWay
GreeneWay to Tuskawilla Road
Tuskawilla Road to CR 419
CR 419 to US 17-92
US 17-92 to CR 427
.
University Boulevard
SR 436 to Goldenrod Road (SR 551)
Goldenrod Road (SR 551) to
Econlockhatchee Trail
Econlockhatchee Trail to Greene Way
Greene Way to Dean Road
Dean Road to Rouse Road
Rouse road to Alafaya Trail (SR 434)
In the event that a roadway widening is identified which is not compatible with adopted policy of the
FDOT or local government (for example, because it has been designated as a constrained facility) the Developer,
Seminole County, the ECFRPC, the FDCA and the party having either maintenance or jurisdictional responsibility
for the facility shall jointly determine alternate mitigation solutions to provide for the transportation needs.
c. The County hereby acknowledges and agrees that the Developer has satisfied the
.
monitoring and modeling requirements as set forth in this paragraph 13 with respect to Phase 3.
E\034S8\Corres\nopc-final clean county 301 amend do-November 16
14. Transportation: Monitoring and Modeling Results.
.
a. The Project shall not commence beyond Phase 2 (an equivalent of 6062 total gross peak
hour trip ends or 66,922 total gross daily trip ends) into Phase 3 when service levels are below the minimum service
level adopted in the applicable local government's comprehensive plan for that specific roadway during the peak
hour and the Project contributes. or is projected to contribute with the next phase of traffic, five percent (5%) or
greater of the adopted LOS service volume of the roadway or intersection as determined by the monitoring program
required in the preceding condition. unless mitigation measures and/or improvements are secured and committed for
completion during the phase or subphase in which impacts occur.
b. Prior to the commencement of Phase 3, this list of committed roadway improvements
must be identified. These improvements shall occur by the required threshold in order for the Project to proceed
through the balance of the phase or subphase. If the Developer can demonstrate that a portion of a phase or
subphase does not adversely affect the regional roadway network as determined by the monitoring and modeling
tests discussed above, ;lien the Developer may proceed with that portion of the phase (and only that portion). It is
the intent of this condition to ensure that this Development Order is consistent with the provisions of Section
. 380.06(15)(e)(1) and 380.06(15)(e)(2), Florida Statutes, provided, however, that it is not the intent of this provision
or any other provision of this Development Order to impose upon the County any obligation to fund or constrUct or
to provide any public facilities to or for the Developer upon which the Development may depend_ Further, this
condition is intended to avoid the conflict of simultaneously applying the differing standards of the aforesaid 5%
(9J-2.045, F.A.C.) rule and the County's (or applicable local government) concurrency management systems.
Should the provisions of this Development Order give direction that prevents compliance with Seminole County's
(or applicable local government) concurrency management regulations as amended, then the concurrency
regulations will govern in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations.
r
c. To aid in assessing the Project's potential for impacting facilities, DR! Annual Reports
shall include documentation that the applicable level of service requirements are being met Such documentation
shall include current roadway LOS (may be obtained from latest Concurrency Management System data of
.-
Seminole County and/or other applicable local government), Project traffic contributed to the roadway facility
.
(based on latest test modeling/monitoring effort) and other appropriate information.
E\03458\Corres\nopc.final clean county )01 amend do-November 17
15. Transportation Mitigation:
Phase 3a reauirements (2005) The following improvements are those either assumed to be in place
(because they are programmed or are already funded) or they are necessary as a result of background traffic and
project-related traffic.
The following improvements are assumed to be programmed or funded:
1-4 and SR 417 - New interchange.
Mitchell Hammock Road and Lockwood Boulevard - add eastbound left-turn lane.
SR 434 - Widen to 4 lanes from Tuskawilla Road to SR 417 (year 2002).
CR 419 - Widen to 4 lanes from Lockwood Boulevard to Oviedo City limits (year 2002).
CR 419 - Widen to 4 lanes from the Oviedo City limits to Second Street (year 2002).
Dodd Road - Widen to 4 lanes from Red Bug Lake Road to Howell Branch Road (year
SR 417 - new 4 lane toll road from US 17-92 to Lake Mary Boulevard (year 2002).
SR 417 - New 4 lane toll road from Lake Mary Boulevard to Rinehart Road (year 2002).
East Lake Drive - Widen to 4 lanes from Seminole Boulevard to TuskawiUa Road (year
SR 426 - Widen to 4 lanes from SR 417 to Mitchell Hammock Road (year 2002).
SR 434 and SR 426 - As mitigation for any impact on the intersection of SR 434 and SR
426, either Division Street shall be extended from Mitchell Hammock Road to CR 419 in a 2 lane configuration, or
such alternative improvement as may be adopted by the City to mitigate said intersection shall be constructed.
E\0345S\ColTCs\nOpc.final clean county 3~ amend do-November IS
.
.
.
.
.
.
The following improvements or mitigation are required as a result of background traffic and Project traffic
prior to commencement of Phase 3a:
I. Red Bug Lake and SR 436 - the Developer shall pay Developer's proportionate share of
the cost of a study of improvement needs for the specified intersection, which proportionate share shall be based on
the ratio of Project traffic to total traffic. For purposes of this Development Order, Developer's proportionate share
shall be deemed to be Seventy Five Thousand and No/100 Dollars (575,000.00), which shall constitute Developer's
mitigation for the Project's impact upon the specified intersection. Within thirty (30) days after receipt of written
notice from either the Florida Department of Transportation or Seminole County that such study has been
authorized, Developer shall pay its proportionate share directly to such party.
m. SR 434 and SR 426 - As mitigation for any impact on the intersection of SR 434 and SR
426, Division Street shall be extended from Mitchell Hammock Road to CR 419 in a 2 lane configuration. Pursuant
to Rule 9j-2.045(7)(a) Florida Administrative Code, this condition shall be deemed satisfied if such improvement is
(i) in place and operational, (ii) under actual construction for the entire improvement, or (Hi) committed for
construction in the current three (3) years of the City of Oviedo's Capital Improvement Element. In addition,
Developer shall conveyor cause to be conveyed an approximately 5.04 acre site as more particularly described on
Exhibit "D" attached hereto to the City of Oviedo for use as wetland mitigation for South Division Street. This
proviSion shall be modified by Seminole County in the event that the City of Oviedo modifies its comprehensive
plan with respect to Division Street.
The following improvements or mitigation are required as a result of background traffic and Project traffic
prior to commencement of Phase 3b:
n. SR 426 must be widened to four (4) lanes from Mitchell Hammock Road to Winter
Springs Boulevard. This improvement must be committed for construction within the first 3 years of the FDOT 5
Year Work Program prior to commencement of Phase 3b development. In the event that this improvement is not
committed for construction within the first 3 years of the FDOT 5 Year Work Program, the Developer may proceed
with construction of Phase. 3b if Developer (i) advances the funds necessary for the constrUction of such
improvement, or (ii) conducts a final monitoring/modeling program in accordance with the requirements of
Paragraph 13(a) above which demonstrates that such improvement is not required.
E\03458\Corres\nopc-final clean county Jnl amend do-November 19
The status of the improvements listed above shall be reported in the DRl Annual Reports.
16.
Transportation: Committed Improvements.
.
a. The parties acknowledge that the local comprehensive plan is in compliance with Chapter
163, Part II, F.S., and that the plan includes a transportation concurrency management system that recognizes
improvements scheduled within the first three years of the capital improvements schedule (pursuant to Rule 9J-
5.0055(2)(c), F.A.C.), and within the first three years of the current FDOT improvement program. Therefore, for
Phase 330 which is undergoing local concurrency review and for which adequate roadway facilities are conditionally
reserved those improvements identified in Paragraphs 15( a) through 15 (k) shall be counted as committed regardless
of whether said improvements are acmally constructed.
b. Committed improvements may also include (i) a binding financially secured and
irrevocable commitment by the Developer or other applicable persons or entities for the design, engineering and
actual construction of the necessary improvements (with the posting of a cash bond. surety bond, irrevocable letter
of credit or other security in a form satisfactory to Seminole County (or the applicable government of jurisdiction)),
which requires construction to occur during the applicable phase and must be in accordance with the requirements of
applicable law, and must otherwise comply with the requirements of the Seminole County (or the applicable
.
government of jurisdiction) Comprehensive Plan, or (ii) any alternative agreed upon by Seminole County (or the
applicable government jurisdiction), the ECFRPC, the DCA and the Developer and incorporated into the
Development Order by amendment.
17. Transportation: FDOT Agreement. In the event that the monitoring/modeling results as set forth
in Paragraphs 13 and 14 hereof show that improvements must be made to state roads and if mitigation is not
provided as set forth in Paragraphs 15 and 16, then prior to any construction of any portion of the subphases of
Phase 3 and subject to the provisions of Florida Statutes, Section 380.06(15)(e), the Developer, Seminole County (or
the applicable government of jurisdiction) and the FOOT shall enter into an agreement which ensures that a
proportionate share contribution is made to the FOOT for Project impacts to State roads. The geographical limits of
state roads subject to ems condition shall be determined by the FDOT but shall be restricted to those roadway
facilities which are operating adversely and the Project contributes 5% or greater to the adopted minimum LOS
service volume. The calculations shall consider impacts of the entire Project through Phase 3 buildout.
Determination of the proportionate share payment shall use the following proportionate share contribution formula:
.
E\034S8\COITeS\nopc.final clean county 3" amend do-November 20
DR! Trips xc
ost
SV Increase
.
For this formula. DRI Trips is the cumulative number of the trips from the development expected to reach
the roadway during the peak hour from the complete Phase 3 buildout; SV Increase is the change in peak hour
maximum service volume of the roadway resulting from construction of the improvement necessary to maintain the
desired level of service; and Cost is the cost of construction, at the time of Developer payment, of an improvement
necessary to maintain the desired level of service. Construction cost includes all improvement associated costs,
including engineering design, right-of-way acquisition, planning, engineering, inspection, and other associated
physical development costs directly required and associated with the construction of the improvement, as
determined by the government agency having maintenance authority over the roadway.
If the parties cannot reach agreement independently by that time, or if so desired by the parties at any time
prior to that, then the issues in dispute shall be resolved through the ECFRPC'sadopted Dispute Resolution Process
or similar process. The solutions recommended as a result of this process shall be implemented and the
-
Development Order amended pursuant to Section 380.06( 19), Florida Statutes, to include these solutions.
..
This agreement shall apply only to the impacted state facilities and shall be consistent with the provisions
of Rule 9J-2.045(6), F.A.C. and Section 380.06(15)(e), Florida Statutes.
18. Transportation: Annual Reports. In each DRl annual report, the Developer agrees that it shall
report all information required in F.A.C. Rule 9J-2.025. In addition, the annual report shall include turning
movement counts at Project entrances and the cumulative external traffic being generated by the Project, either by
actual count or through utilization of the most current edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip
Generation Manual and development occupancy data. The chosen method shall be used consistently through the life
of the Project
19. Settlement Agreement. Toward the' achievement of the objectives in the preceding conditions, an
agreement among the City of Oviedo, City of Winter Springs, Rouse-Orlando, Inc., a Maryland corporation, and the
Developer has been entered into and incorporated by reference hereto. Said agreement ad~~ses_~~,~arifies issues
-'--
relating to mitigation for the impacts of the Project on transportation facilities within said jurisdictions and other
... --* ----------...-- -.-
matters as are more specifically set forth in said agreement. Nothing contained within said agreement alters or
. waives the provisions and requirements ,of the other conditions contained in this Development Order as a mitigative
r:neasure for the transportation impacts of the Project. Furthermore, ~said agreement
E\034S8\Corres\nopc-finaJ clean county 301 amend do-November 21
s~brogates any ~_?!1_~itiol1 contained inJhis Deve10pment_Qrder_
20.
Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation.
.
a. In the interest ofsafecy, and to promote alternative forms of transportation, the Developer
shall provide a safe system for cyclist and pedestrian circulation on site. The Developer shall consult ECFRPC's
and the County's Bicycle Coordinator regarding provisions for ped~strian and bicycle facilities. To the extent
practicable, walkways and bikeways shall be constructed between the regional mall, peripheral retail, and the
residential development surrounding the Project site, provided, however, no bikeways or pedestrian walkways shall
be constructed on land other than the Property. On-site bikeways shall be connected at Project entrances with
external bicycle systems (if any) and will be provided in accordance with the current State and County standards at
the time of implementation. Appropriate signage identifying bike routes will be installed. The provision of bike
lockers shall be required for the mall and showers for employees strongly encouraged. Notwithstanding the deletion
of Parcel 34 from this Development Order, the condition set forth in this sub-paragraph (a) shall nonetheless apply.
b. Special attention shall be given to the provision of a bicycle connection from the mall to
the CSX railroad right-of-way. The CSX has announced that it will abandon this right-of-way and the state and
adjacent local governments have expressed interest in acquiring this right-of-way for a Rails-to- Trails project. The
.
Developer shall participate in any planning process initiated by the Metropolitan Planning Organization or local
government regarding this potential Rails-to- Trails project. Notwithstanding the deletion of Parcel 34 from this
Development Order, the condition set forth in this sub-paragraph (b) shall nonetheless apply.
21. Ridesharing Program. The Developer shall make lmown to tenants of the Project that it is served
by an existing ridesharing program operated by LYNX- Transit and current ridesharing infonnation shall be
prominently displayed in public gathering areas, in employment centers, and in commercial center areas. Upon
opening of the mall, a full time ridesharing coordinator shall be hired by the Developer and funded by the Developer
for the life of the Development Order for the Oviedo Marketplace Project. The ridesharing coordinator is primarily
responsible for coordinating with the area transit provider, conducting ridesharing campaigns within the Oviedo
Marketplace Project, publicity, processing applications, distributing information (including tranSit information), etc.
This position may be incorporated into the functions of any Transportation Management Association ("TMA"), if
one exists which services the area of the Project.
.
22. Transit:
E\03458\ColTCs\nopc-final cle3l1 county 301 i1/l1end do-November 22
a. LYNX service cOMecting the Oviedo Marketplace Project to existing routes.
employment centers and appropriate residential areas shall be initiated upon opening of the mall. The Oviedo
. Marketplace Project will construct stops for the service, and coordinate with LYNX. At a minimum, the Developer
shall take the steps described in paragraph (b) hereunder to facilitate at least one LYNX route to be operational to
the Project site through the period of effectiveness of the Development Order. At a minimum, transit operations
shall be adequate fO attract 100 peak hour riders prior to Phase 3a and 200 peak hour riders at buildout.
b. Transit passenger shelters and transit parking bays shall be constructed where reasonably
necessary to augment and facilitat~ the operations of off-site transit facilities. The Developer shall consult with
LYNX on the design of bus facilities and amenities, including bus stops, to be located within the Project boundaries.
The following transit provisions shall be required. in consultation with LYNX;
c. Transit service shall be located in proximity to mall entrances, or as determined to be
necessary by LYNX and the County.
-.
d. Access and internal collector and arterial road geometries shall accommodate an eight (8)
.
feet wide by forty (40) feet long advance design coach. The Developer shall provide shelters and pull-out bays
along the on-site transit route. Shelter locations shall be reasonably accessible via walkways/crosswalks for
pedestrian movement to and from buildings and shall meet all regulations required under the Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990 (as it may be amended from time to time).
e. Appropriate. signage and sufficient area lighting will be required at all bus stops and
shelter locations.
f. Transit schedule and information displays will be provided. at a minimum, at each on-site
bus stop.
g. Maintenance of transit amenities shall 'be the responsibility of the CDD or a property
owners' association formed by the Developer.
h. Details, standards and phasing of all transit amenity provisions must be approved by
.
LYNX.
J. Pedestrian movement between bus stopS shall not exceed 1300 feet.
E\034S8\Corres\nopc-linaJ clean county 301 amend do-Novcmbcr 23
J. Shuttle service that may be provided within the Project, if any. should develop an
operating plan to coordinate with the LYNX regional network. as applicable.
.
If additional property is necessary for bus stops beyond that which can be accommodated within the
existing right-of-way, then this land shall be provided at no cost by the Developer. The need for additional land
shall be reviewable and resolved by Seminole County upon request by the Developer.
23. Transportation Management Association.
a. The Developer shall become an active and fmancially supportive member of any
Transportation Management Association ("TMA") which services this area.
b. Either through the TMA or individually, the Developer shall provide or require of mall
tenants of Phase 2 and employers in Phase 3 of the Project the following:
c. Require that transit and ridesharing stUdies be conducted by employers of more than 50
-~
people to assess travel patterns and commuting needs. This information shall be supplied to the TMA, if one is
operational. and LYNX. and shall be summarized and included in the DRI Annual Report.
I.
Preferential parking will be provided by employers to their employees who
.
participate in rideshare programs.
II. The Developer shall not prohibit the use of a portion of the mall parking area as
a rideshare lot. The Developer shall accommodate this usage through coordination with LYNX,
Seminole County and the Metropolitan Planning Organization. On-site lots should accommodate
at least 100 vehicles and may be shared with parking for commercial land uses and should be
coordinated with available transit systems.
lll. Promote and encourage variable work hours and flextime participation by on-
site employers.
IV. Make known to tenants that the Project area is served by an existing ridesharing
program operated by LYNX. Future transit (when available) and current ridesharing information
shall be prominently displayed in all public gathering areas, in employment centers and in
.
commercial center areas.
E\03458\Corres\nopc.tinal cle:ln county 3-- amend do-November 24
.
.
.
v. Provide incentives, if necessary, to encourage the establishment of day care
facilities within the Project.
d.
Mandatory membership by all non-residential entities within the Project shall be required
through enforceable covenants and other similar mechanisms as to those acquiring land within the Project after the
effective date of this Development Order.
24. Traffic Reduction Goals. The Developer shall commit to a definite, but non-binding, percentage
goal toward the reduction in vehicle trips through the promotion of walking, bicycling, ridesharing and transit usage.
This shall be encouraged by the Developer through incentives to tenants and landowners within the Project. The
percentage reduction goals shall be as follows:
Phase
O~edo Marketplace DR! Overall
Peak Hour Traffic Reduction Goal
Phase 2
Phase 3a
Ph~3b
5.0% of peak hour volume
10.0% of peak hour volume
15.0% of peak hour volume
Within the context of the annual monitoring report, the Developer shall present an evaluation of the state of
the alternate transportation systems serving the site of the DR! Project. Progress shall be compared to the goals
stated above. Progress for the reporting year shall be documented to include ridership levels, transit route changes,
alterations or additions, ridesharing participation, transit amenity construction, park-and-ride lot sites, bicycles and
pedestrian facilities. and other efforts which facilitate movement into and around the site of the DR! Project by
means other than the single occupant vehicle.
25. Project Access.
a. In order to provide safe access and to preserve operational capacity, left and right turn
deceleration lanes shall be constructed at all Project entrances. Access to all regional roadways shall be limited to
the greatest extent possible.
b.
In order to facilitate movement within the site, minimize traffic on the regional roadway
-
network and to encourage sharing of access poinTS to the regional roadway network. the Developer shall where
--
practical:
I.
allow cOMections between adjacent projects where land use compatibility
E\03458\Cprres\nopc.final clean county 3" amcnd,do-Novcmber 25
allows, and;
11.
share and combine driveways and create internal circulation systems to limit
congestion along regional roadways.
SECTION v. MONITORING MECHANISM
I. The County has established site review approval processes and inspection procedures for review
of developments pursuant to the Seminole County Land Development Code, which will constitute the monitoring
mechanism for assuring compliance by the Developer with this Development Order, and the Developer shall comply
with same. The Manager of the County's Development Review Division shall be the official responsible for
monitoring compliance by the Developer with this Development Order.
2. Notwithstanding anything in this Dev.e1opment Order to the contrary, if the conditions set out in
this Development Order are being satisfied and complied with by the owners and operators of one parcel within the
Project as depicted in Exhibit "B" attached to this Development Order, then upon the written request of the owner of
the parcel, the County Director of Land Management shall confirm in writing to the owner, mortgagees and potential
mortgagees of the parcel that all the conditions are being complied with. If all the conditions are not being complied
with, the Director shall specify in writing which conditions are not being complied with. Further, noncompliance
with any conditions herein by the owner, mortgagee, operator, tenant, invitee or contractor of any other parcel within
the Project shall not adversely affect the parcel which is in compliance with this Development Order.
SECTION VI. ANNUAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
I. The Developer shall submit an annual report on or before each anniversary date of this
Development Order during the build-out of the Oviedo Marketplace Project. The annual report shall be submitted co
the Seminole County Planning Department, the ECFRPC, the DCA and all affected permit agencies. The report
shall include:
a. Any changes in the plan of development, or in the representations contained in the ADA,
or in the phasing for the reporting year and for the year;
b.
_A comparison of development activity proposed and actually conducted for the year;
c.
Undeveloped tracts of land that have been sold by the Developer to a separate entity of
Developer;
E\03458\Corres\nopc-linal cle:ln county 3" amend do-November 26
.
.
.
.
.
.
d. Identification and intended use of lands purchased, leased or optioned by the Developer
adjacent to the Property site since this Development Order was issued;
e.
An assessment of the Developer's and the local government's compliance with the
conditions. of approval contained in this Oevelopment Order and the commitments which are contained in the ADA
and which have been identified by the County, the ECFRPC, or the DCA as being significant;
f. Any known incremental DR! applications for development approval or requests for a
substantial deviation determination that were filed in the reporting year or which are to be filed during the next year;
g. Any indication of a change in local government jurisdiction for any portion of the Oviedo
Marketplace Project since this Development Order was issued;
h. A list of all local, state and federal permits which have been obtained or which are
pending by agency, type of permit, permit number and purpose of each;
I. A statement that all persons have been sent copies of the annual report in conformance
with Sections 380.06(15) and (18), Florida Statutes; and
J. A copy of any recorded notice of the adoption of a development order or the subsequent
modification of an adopted development order that was recorded by the Developer pursuant to Section
380.06( 15)(t), Florida Statutes.
SECTION YD. PERIOD OF EFFECTIVENESS
I. This Development Order shan be effective upon adoption by the County and shall remain in full
force and effect for the duration of the development of the Oviedo Marketplace Project as described in the ADA;
provided, however, that if five percent (5%) of Phase 2 (2281 external ADTs) is not constructed on or before
September II, 2002, then without any action being taken by the County this Development Order shall expire except
(i) as to Phases la and Ib which may be constructed, and (ii) as to any continuing obligations of the Developer,
except for any extension~ermitted pursuant to Section 380.06(19)(c), Florida Statutes. The effectiveness of this
Development Order and all Developer promises, commitments, obligations. covenants, liabilities, and
responsibilities may be extended by the County upon a showing by the Developer which demonstrates that the
completed portions and remaining portions of the Oviedo Marketplace Project substantially comply, as determined
E\034S8\Corres\nopc:.finaJ cle:ln county 3~ amend do-November 27
by the County, with the conditions of this Development Order and the provisions of Section 380.06. Florida Statutes.
Notwithstanding any provision herein to the contrary, if this Development Order shall expire, all dedications,
payments, or other considerations previously given by the Developer to the County or any other agency of
.
government shall survive such expiration.
.,
This Development Order and its conditions and all Developer promises, commitments. obligations
covenants, liabi,lities, and responsibilities touch and concern the Property and shall continue to run with, follow and
burden the Property. To this end, the said promises, commitments, obligations. covenants, liabilities and
responsibilities shall inure to the benefIt of the County and shall operate as a perpetual burden and servitude upon
-
the Property unless released by means of an appropriate recordable instrument by the County. This Development
Order shall be recorded in the Official Records of the County and public land records. This Development Order and
all obligations, commitments, covenants, promises, liabWties and responsibilities herein incurred by the Developer
shall be binding upon Developer and Developer's transferees, assigns and successors in interest (including
specifically, but not by way of limitation, any person or entity developing a part of the Oviedo Marketplace Project),
~.
and shall inure to the benefit of the County and its assigns and successors in interest as to all and each part of the
Property. The Developer shall pay any and all recording costs.
3.
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 380.06, Florida Statutes, this Development Order contains
.
Project buildout dates of 2002 (Phase 1) and 2005 (Phase 3). This Development Order shall expire seven (7) years
from the buildout date of Phase 3b.
SECTION VITI. RESTRICTIONS OR DOWN-ZONING
Pursuant to Section 380.06(15)(c)(3), Florida Statutes, the Property shall not be subject to down-zoning,
unit density reduction, or intensity reduction until September 11,2010, unless this Development Order was based on
substantially inaccurate information provided by the Developer or the change is clearly necessary by the County to
protect the public health, safety, or welfare. The above down-zoning conditions shall not act as a limitation on the
provisions of Section 30.449 of the Seminole County Land Development Code providing for the timing of
development and Section 30.449 providing for determination of substantial development. The Developer agrees to
hold harmless, defend, indemnify and covenants not to sue the County with regard to the construction of any
improvements necessary -for the Oviedo Marketplace Project and with regard to any actions or omissions of the
Developer.
SECTION IX. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
.
The Developer has created a CDD pursuant to Chapter 190, Florida Statutes. The CDD may construct or
E\03458\Corres\nopc.final clean county 301 amend do-November 28
fund any infrastructure required in this Development Order. Such projects include, but are not limited [0,
transportation, surface water management, water, sewer and wastewater facilities and structures, and waste
. collection and disposal systems and facilities. Further, if the Developer is required to make or cause to be made
capital improvements herein, then it is intended that the Developer or the CDD may make such improvements.
SECTION X. MODIFICATIONS TO THIS DEVELOPMENT ORDER
The Developer shall submit, simultaneously, to Seminole County, the ECFRPC, and the DCA, any request
for approval of a proposed change to this Development of Regional Impact and shall comply with Section
380.06(19), Florida Statutes.
ADOPTED and approved subject to the conditions set forth herein on this _ day of
2000 by the Board of Commissioners of Seminole County'.
A TIEST:
-.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
Name:
Title:
Date:
MAR Y ANNE MORSE
Clerk to the Board of County
Commissioners of Seminole County Florida.
.
For the use and reliance of
Seminole County only.
Approved as to from and legal sufficiency
As authorized for execution by the Board of County
Commissioners at their ,2000,
regular meeting.
County Attorney
"COUNTY"
...
.
E\OJ4S8\Com:s\nopc-linaJ clean county 31ll amend do-Novcmbcr 29
JOINDER AND CONSENT BY DEVELOPER
A TIEST:
Name:
Title:
Jay A. DecalOr, III
Division Vice President
STATE OF FLORIDA.
COUNTY OF SEMINOLE
THE VIERA COMPANY, a Florida corporation
By:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Stephen L. Johnson
Vice President
"DEVELOPER"
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1001 by
as of BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS.
SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State of Florida on behalf of the County. He/she
is personally known to me or produced as identification and did not take an oath.
-
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF
Notary Public
Name of Notary:
Notary Public, State of Florida
Commission Number:
My Commission Expires:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
Stephen L. Johnson as Vice President of THE VIERA COMPANY,
corporation. He is personally known to me or produced
take an oath.
day of , 2001 by
a Florida corporation, on behalf of the
as identification and did not
E\03458\Corrcslnopc-final clean county 301 an'Iend do-November 30
Notary Public
Name of Notary:
Notary Public, State of Florida
Commission Number:
My Commission Expires:
.
.
.
.
.
.
EXHIB IT LIST
Exhibit "A"
Exhibit "B"
E.'<hibit "C"
Exhibit "D"
Legal Description of the Property
Map H (Master Development Plan)
Equivalency Matrix
Legal Description of Wetland Mitigation Site
E:\03\03458 _ Viera. Oviedo Markctplacc\Corrcspond\Nopc..county\Final Clean Seminole Cty 3rd Amend.D.O.- November Hearing.rtf
-.
E\OJ458\Corres\nopc-tinal clean county 3"" amend do-November 31
Exhibit A.
OVIEDO CROSSING
LEGAL DESCRIPTlON
.
PARENT PARCEL:
A PORTION OF SECTIONS 16. 17. AND 20, TOWNSHIP 21 SOUTH. RANGE 31 :AST. BEING MORE
PARTICULARL Y DESCRIBED AS FOu..OWS:
.
COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 17. FOR A POINT OF
REFERENCE; THENCE RUN NORTH 89047'00" WEST. ALONG THE SOUTr-i UNE OF
SAID SECTION 17. A DISTANCE OF 1083.21 FEET TO THE POINT OF 8EGINNING;
THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 89047'00" WEST, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, A
DISTANCE OF 249.02 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 28, SLAVIA
COLONY COMPANY'S SUBDIVISION. AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2. PAGE 71,
PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA; rr-iENCE. DEPARTING SAID
SOUTH UNE. RUN SOUTH 00050'55" EAST, ALONG THE WEST UNE OF SAID LOT
28, A DISTANCE OF 471.56 FEET; THENCE, DEPARTING SAID WEST I:.JNE. RUN
SOUTH 37009'05" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 312.85 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH
32017'05" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 718.75 FEET TO THE SOUTH UNE OF LOT 33 OF
SAID SLAVIA COLONY COMPANY'S SOBDIVISION: Tr-iENCE RUN NORTH 89042'55~
WEST. ALONG SAID SOUTH UNE OF LOT 33. A DISTANCE OF 80.00 ~r:ET TO THE
SOUTHWEST CORNE.~ OF SAID LOT 33: THENCE. DE?ARTlNG SAID SOUTH UNE.
RUN NORTH 00052'18" WEST. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF LOTS 33 AND 34 OF
SAID SLAY.IA COLONY COMPANY'S SUBDIVISION. A DISTANCE OF 878.78 FEET:
THENCE. DEPARTlNG SAID WEST UNE, RUN NORTH 41-58'16" EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 605.78 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 34, SAID POINT
ALSO BEING ON THE SOlJiH UNE OF SAID SECTION 17: THENCE RUN NORTH
89047'00" WEST, ALONG SAID SOUTH UNE OF SECTION 17, A DISTANCE OF
1078.12 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 35 OF SAID SLA VIA COLONY
COMPANY'S SUBDIVISION. SAID CORNER ALSO BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER
OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTlON 17; THENCE RUN SOUTr-i
89058'42" WEST. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE. A DISTANCE OF 1296.54 ~C:I TO
Tr-iE EASTERLY RIGHT~OF-WAY UNE OF PROPOSED REO BUG ROAD, HAVING A
PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH OF 140.00 ~C:I. SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON A
NON~TANGENT CURVE. CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, FROM WHICH A RADIAL LINE
BEARS SOUTH 37037'39" EAST; THENCE RUN SOUT\:1WESTERLY ALONG SAID
PROPOSED RED BUG ROAD AND SAID CURVE. HA VING A RADIUS LENGTH OF
1203.24 FEET, A CENTRAL. ANGLE OF 13038'37". AN ARC LENGTH OF 286.52
FEET, A CHORD LENGTH OF 285.85 FEET. AND A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH
45-33'02" WEST; THENCE. DEPARTING SAID PROPOSED REO BUG ROAD RIGHT-
OF-WAY. RUN NORTH 51016'16" WEST. A DISTANCE OF 140.00 ~c:-r TO THE
NORTHEASTERLY UNE OF A 110 FOOT FLORIDA POWER AND UGHT COMPANY
EASEMENT. AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 143. PAGE 253, OF SAID
PUBUC RECORDS; THENCE RUN NORTH 32011'14" WEST. ALONG SAID
NORTHEASTERLY LINE. A DISTANCE OF 505.1 1 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID
NORTHEASTERLY LINE. RUN NORTH 01011'40" EAST. A DISTANCE OF 550.79
FEET TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE. CONCA VE NORTHEASTERLY,
FROM WHICH A RADIAL UNE BEAAS NORTH 01043'03" EAST; THENCE RUN
NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS LENGTH OF 750.00
FEET. A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 138-34'34", AN ARC LENGTH OF 1613.96 FEET, A
CHORD LENGTH OF 1403.06 F::T, AND A CHORD SEARING OF NORTH 18-59'40"
WEST; THENCE RUN NORTr-i 50017'37" EAST. A DISTANCE OF 423.20 ~C:I TO A
.
1
POINT ON n-tE SOUTHERN MOST LINE OF TUSCAWILLA UNIT 7, AS RECORDED IN
PLAT BOOK 22. PAGES 46 AND 47. OF SAID PUBLIC RECORDS: THENCE RUN
SOUTri 69003'43" EAST, ALONG SAID SOUTHERN MOST LINE. A DISTANCE OF
664.77 F:ET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 31, OF SAID TUSCAWILLA
UNIT 7; THENCE, DEPARTlNG SAID SOUTriERN MOST UNE. RUN NORTH 00041'25"
WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID TUSCAWILLA UNIT 7, A DISTANCE OF
1 796.4.0 ~t:.t:i TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TUSCAWILLA UNIT 13. AS
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 29, PAGES 1 AND 2. OF SAID PUBLIC RECORDS:
THENCE. DE?ARTlNG SAID EAST UNE. RUN NORTH 89051'03" EAST. ALONG THE
SOUTH LINE OF SAID TUSCAWILLA UNIT 13. A DISTANCE OF 2741.19 F::I TO
THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1 1 OF rriE AFORESAID SLA VIA COLONY
COMPANY'S SUBDIVISION; THENCE, DEPARTING SAID SOUTH LINE. RUN SOUTH
87016'25" EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF LOTS" AND 12 OF SAID SLAVIA
COLONY COMPANY'S' SUBDIVISION. A DISTANCE OF 1285.36 FEET TO THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 12; THENCE. DEPARTING SAID NORTH LINE. .
RUN SOUTH 00028'26" EAST. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF LOTS 12. 10, 7 AND 6,
OF SAID SLAVIA COLONY COMPANY'S SUBDIVISION. A DISTANCE OF,l582.1 2
FEET. TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 2. OF SAID SLAVIA COLONY
COMPANY'S SUBDIVISION; rriENCE. DEPARTING SAID EAST LINE. RUN SOUTH
89045' 41" EAST, ALONG THE NOR~ LINE OF LOTS 2 AND 1. OF SAID SLA VIA
COLONY COMPANY'S SUBDIVISION. A DISTANCE OF 1267.80 FEET TO A POINT
ON rriE WEST LINE OF A CSX RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, HAVING A 75.00 FOOT
RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH; THENCE. DEPARTING SAID NORTH UNE, RUN SOUTH
23048'40:" WEST. ALONG SAlD WEST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 501.88 FeEl:
THENCE DEPARTING SAID WEST LINE. RUN NORTH 89045'41" WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 387.75 M:: I T.O A POINT ON THE EAST UNE OF SAID LOT 2 OF SLA VIA
COLONY COMPANY'S SUBDIVISION; THENCE RUN NORTH 00040' 15- WEST.
ALONG SAID EAST LINE. A DISTANCE OF 197.37 F--= I TO THE SOUTH LINE OF
THE NORTH 262.66 FEET OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE, DEPARTlNG SAID EAST LINE.
RUN NORTH 89045'41" WEST, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE. A DISTANCE OF 281.76
FEET; THENCE. DEPARTING SAID NORTH LINE, RUN SOUTH 73048'Ol'! WEST. A
DISTANCE OF 405.71 FEET TO A POINT ON rriE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 2:
THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 73048'01" WEST. A DISTANCE OF 25.96 FE.:i;
THENCE RUN SOUTH 00034'10" EAST. A DISTANCE OF 226.37 FEET; THENCE
RUN NORTH 89045'41" WEST. A DISTANCE OF 138.94 ~=I TO A POINT ON THE
NORTHERLY LINE OF L1GHiWOOD KNOT CANAL, HAVING A WIDTH OF 50.00
FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 51039'21" EAST, ALONG SAlD NORTHERLY LINE, A
DISTANCE OF 68.71 FEET TO A POINT ON.THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 19 OF SAlD
SLAVlA COLONY COMPANY'S SUBDIVISION; THENCE. DEPARTING SAID
NORTHERLY LINE OF L1GHTWOOD KNOT CANAL, RUN NORTH 89046'20" WEST,
ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF LOTS 1 9 AND 18 OF SAID SLA VIA COLONY
COMPANY'S SUBDIVISION. A DISTANCE OF 972.95 FEET; THENCE, DEPARTlNG
SAID NORTH LINE, RUN SOUTH 00035'17- EAST, A DISTANCE OF 668.82 FEET TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
.
.
AND TOGETHER WITH:
A PORTION OF SECTION 20. TOWNSHIP .21 SOUTH, RANGE 31 EAST, BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTlON 20, FOR A POINT OF
REFERENCE; THENCE RUN NORTH 89058'42" EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF
.
2
.
SAID SECTION 20, A DISTANCE OF 1332.41 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER
OF LOT 43, OF THE AFORESAID SLAVIA COLONY COMPANY'S SUBDIVISION,
THENCE. DEPARTING SAID NORTH UNE OF SECTlON 20, RUN SOUTH 00048' 20.
EAST. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF LOTS 43 AND 44, OF SAID SLAVIA COLONY
COMPANY'S SUBDIVISION, A DISTANCE OF 835.41 FE:T TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID WEST LINE, SOUTH 00.48'20. EAST,
A DISTANCE OF 493.52 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 44;
THENCE, DEPARTING SAID WEST LINE, RUN SOUTH 890S8'S3" EAST, ALONG THE
SOUTH UNE OF SAID LOT 44, A DISTANCE OF 667.2S FEET TO THE NORir-tEAST
CORNER OF LOT 45 OF SAID SLAVIA COLONY COMPANY'S SU8DIVISION; THENCE.
DEPARTING SAID SOUTH LINE. RUN SOUTH 000S1 '01" EAST, ALONG THE EAST
UNE OF LOTS 45 AND 46 OF SAID SLAVIA COMPANY'S SUBDIVISION. A
DISTANCE OF 1279.50 FEET TO A POINT ON rriE ::XISTlNG NORiriERL Y RIGHT-OF-
WAY UNE OF REO BUG ROAD, WHICH HAS A VARYING RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDiri;
THENCE, DEPARTING- SAID EAST UNE, RUN ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-
WAY UNE NORTH 89056'28", A DISTANCE OF 334.13 Fe:'1; THENCE DEPARTING
SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-W~Y UNE RUN NORTH 00049'40" WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 439.30 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 42019'05" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 488.49
FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST UNE OF LOT 46 OF SAID SLA VIA COLONY
COMPANY'S SUBDIVISION; THENCE FtUN SOU11-f 00048'20. EAST. ALONG SAID
WEST UNE. A DISTANCE OF 77.73 FEET TO THE AFORESAID EXISTING
NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE OF RED BUG ROAD; THENCE RUN ALONG SAID
NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES:
THENCE RUN NORTH 89056'28" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 668.25 FEET; THENCE
RUN SOUTH 00045'39" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 35.00 FEET: THENCE RUN NORTH
89056'28- WEST, A DISTANCE OF 668.28 r:-:::'1 TO A POINT ON THE WEST UNE
OF LOT 65 OF SAID SLAV1A COLONY COMPANY'S SUBDIVISION. SAID POINT
ALSO BEING ON THE _EAST UNE OF A PARCa OF LAND, RECORDED IN OFFICIAL
RECORDS BOOK 691, PAGE 637, OF THE AFORESAID PUBUC RECORDS; THENCE,
DEPARTING SAID NOR11-fE.~LY RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE. RUN NORTH-00042'58" WEST,
ALONG THE WEST UNE OF LOTS 65, 64 AND 61, A DISTANCE OF 1616.12 FEET;
11-fENCE, DEPARTING SAID WEST UNE, AND SAID EAST UNE OF SAlD PARCEL OF
LAND RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 691, PAGE 637, RUN NORTH
89017'02" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 155.00 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 56012'58
EAST. A DISTANCE OF 190.00 r:-:::'1; THENCE RUN SOUTH 830S9'S5- EAST, A
DISTANCE OF 169.67 FEET: THENCE RUN NORTH 42032'02" EAST. A DISTANCE
OF 175.00 FEET; 11-fENCE RUN NORTH 89017'03" EAST, A DISTANCE OF "20.00
FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 72042'58" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 85.93 FEET; THENCE
RUN NORTH 89017'02" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 531.89 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
.
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARENT PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINS 496.860 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
LESS:
THAT PORTION- OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED RIGHT -CF-W A Y FOR STATE ROAD 417 THAT UES
WITHIN THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARENT PARCEl..
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNEFl OF SAID SECTlON 17; THENCE S 89047'50.
W ALONG THE SOUTHERLY UNE OF SAID SE 1/4, A DISTANCE OF 572.03 FEET TO A
POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING S 69047'SO- W ALONG THE
SOUTHERLY UNE OF SAID SE 1/4, A DISTANCE OF 1090.89 FE:'1 TO A POINT; THENCE
.
3
LEAVING THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SE 1/4, N 05051'37~ E, A DIS7ANCE OF 174.'Si
FE:T TO A POINT; THENCE N 74.4.7'07 W,~ A DISTANCE OF 113.07 FE:7 TO A POINT'
THENCE N 87.30'44" W, A DIS7ANCE OF 390.59 FE:i TO A POINT; THENCE N 80008'06
W, A DISTANCE OF 11'.72 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N 00026'50 W, A DISTANCE OF
170.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N 86001'09 E, A DIS7ANCE OF 500.90 FE:T TO A
POINT; THENCE N 75"09'40 E, A DISTANCE OF 156.93 FE:T TO A POINT; THENCE N
31'55'54" E, A DIS'iANCE OF 153.21 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N 1 5020'52~ E, A
DISTANCE OF 191.25 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N 09038'39" E. A DISTANCE OF 275.57
FE:T TO A POINT; T'riENCE ALONG A CURVE CONCAVE SOUT'riEASTERLY AN ARC
DISTANCE OF 560.89 FEET (SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 640.00 FE:T, A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 50012'49", AND A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF N 34'45'04" E, 543.11
FEET) TO A POINT; T'riENCE N 59051' 28" E. A DISTANCE OF 348.93 FE:T TO A POINT;
THENCE ALONG A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY AN ARC DISTANCE OF 620.79
FE:7 (SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 850.00 FEET. A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 41050'43",
AND A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF N 38056'07" E. 607,08 ;:Em TO A POINT;
THENCE N 18000'45" E. A DISTANCE OF 125.70 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S 65007'30"
E. A DISTANCE OF 60.17 FE:T _TO A POINT; THENCE N 24052'30" E.:A DISTANCE OF
130,00 FE:T TO A POINT; THENCE N 30011'15~ W. A DIS7ANCE OF 120.06 FE:T TO A
POINT; THENCE N 20051'49" E. A DISTANCE OF 818.94 FE:T TO A POINT ON THE
EASTERLY LINE OF SAID NE 114, THENt~E S 00047'59" E. A DISTANCE OF 564.87 FE:i TO
A POINT BEING THE NE CORNER OF THE SE 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 17; THENCE ALONG
THE EASTERLY UNE OF SAID SE 1/4, S 00059'36" E, A DIS'iANCE OF 484.46 F:=T TO A
POINT; THENCE LEAVING T'riE SAID EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SE 1/4, N 70016'15~ W, A
DISTANCE OF 150.23 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S 19043'45" W, A DIS7ANCE OF 130.00
FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S 23017'55" E. A DISTANCE OF 36.86 F::I TO A POINT;
THENCE S 07055'20" W. A DISTANCE OF 102.61 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S 18023'56"
W. A DISTANCE OF 902.3J.FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S 10034'09" W. A DISTANCE OF
308.38 FeET TO A POINT; THENCE S 02008'49" W. A DISTANCE OF 200.77 ;:-"::T TO A
POINT; THENCE ALONG A CURVE CONCAVE NORTriEASTERL Y AN ARC DISTANCE OF
377.07 FEET (SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 262.00 FEET, A CENTMAL ANGLE OF
82027'32", AND A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF 5 39004'57" E. 345.36 FErn TO
A POINT; THENCE S 80018'43" E. A DISTANCE OF 119.86 FE:T TO A POINT; THENCE S
88018'16" E. A DISTANCE OF 101.45 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S 78059'29" E, A
DISTANCE OF 332.86 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S 09014'58" W, A DISTANCE OF 220.00
F:::I TO A POINT; THENCE N 86050'19" W. A DISTANCE OF 326.93 ;:-":::1 TO A POINT;
THENCE N 82053'52" w. A DISTANCE OF 197.38 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S 85'40'48"
W. A DISTANCE OF 83.60 F::1 TO A POINT; THENCE 5 00057'24" E. A DISTANCE OF
73.33 ;:-":::1 TO A POINT; THENCE S 89'47'50" W. A DISTANCE OF 111.87 FE:i TO A
POINT; THENCE S 40004'59" W. A DISTANCE OF 19.66 ;:-"c::ET TO A POINT BEING THE
POINT OF BEGINNING;
THAT PORTION OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR STATE ROAD 417 THAT UES
WITHIN THE AFORESAID PARENT PARCEL CONTAINS 39.159 ACRES. MORE OR LESS.
AND ALSO LESS:
TriAT PORTION OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR STATE ROAD 417 THAT UES
WITHIN THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARENT PARCEL
A PARCEL OF LANO LOCATED IN THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 21 SOUTH. RANGE 31
EAST. SEMINOLE COUNTY. FLORIDA. BEING ALSO THAT PART OF LOTS 33 AND 34 ACCORDING
TO SLAVIA COLONY CO'S. SUBDIVISION RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2. PAGE 71. OF THE PUBUC
4
.
.
.
.
.
.
RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNlY, FLORIDA. LYING WITHIN THE FOLLOWING BOUNDARIES
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE EAST 1 14 CORNE~ OF SAID SECTION 20: THENCE S 89046' ~6~ W
ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID NE 114, A DISTANCE OF 24.08.82 FEET TO A POINT
BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING S 89046' 46~ W ALONG Tr4E
SOUTHEMLY LINE OF SAID NE 1/4, A DISTANCE OF 149.78 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE
LEAVING THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID NE 1/4, N 25022'30" E, A DISTANCE OF 55.4.4-
FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIG;,'T-OF-WAY LINE OF RED BUG LAKE ROAD (100
FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE); THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIG;,'T-OF-WAY LINE S
89046'46~ W, A DISTANCE OF 124.60 ~::-::r TO A POINT ON Tr-lE EASTE.=iLY RIGHT-OF-
WAY LINE OF TAl"FtA STREET (30 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY); THENCE LEAVING SAID
NORTHERL Y RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT -OF.W A Y LINE N
01001 '30" W, A DISTANCE OF 22.80 FE:T TO A POINT; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE-N 26034'28" E, A DISTANCE OF 957.77 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N
27005'36" E, A DISTANCE OF 500.22 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N 21047'55- E, A
DISTANCE OF 400.78 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N 16050'39~ E, A OIST.ANCE OF 202.2~
FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N 08040'33" E, A DISTANCE OF 417.61 FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE N 01011'24. W, A DISTANCE OF 156.52 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N 05051'37~
E, A DISTANCE OF 160.98 F""CI TO ~ POINT ON THE NORTr-lEMLY LINE OF SAID NE 1/4;
THENCE N 89047'50" E ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID NE 1/4, A DISTANCE OF
1090.89 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE LEAVING THE NORTHE.=1LY LINE OF SAID NE 1/4, S
40004'59" W, A DISTANCE OF 788.55 F""CI TO A POINT; THENCE S 56020'20- W, A
DISTANC~OF 116.62 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S 34027'55- W, A DISTANCE OF 506.36
FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S 25022'30" W, A DISTANCE OF 1300.00 F""CI TO A POINT;
THENCE S 21020'22. W, A DISTANCE OF 388.65 FC..ET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAlD REO BUG LAKE ROAD; THENCE S 89046'46" W ALONG SAID
NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 166.11 F""::I TO A POINT; THENCE
LEAVING SAID NORTHEnLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE S 25022'30" W, A DISTANCE OF 55.44
FEET TO A POINT BEING TriE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THAT PORTlON OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR STATE ROAD 417 THAT LIES
WITHIN THE AFORESAID PAAENT PARCEL CONTAINS 7.413 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
AND ALSO LESS:
THAT PORTION OF RED BUG LAKE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, ACCORDING TO RIGHT-OF-WAY AND
RESERVATION MAP BOOK 2, PAGES 56 THROUGH 90 OF THE PUBUC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE
COUNTY, FLORIDA, THAT LIES WITHIN THE PARENT PARCEL OF LAND.
THOSE PORTIONS OF THE ABOVE SAID REO BUG LAKE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY THAT LIE WITHIN
THE AFORESAID PARENT PAACEL CONTAIN 15.126 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PAACEL OF LAND LIES IN SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA AND CONTAINS
435.162 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
LESS;
A TRACT OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 21 SOUTH, RANGE 31 EAST DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS: -
COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 12, OVIEDO CROSSING -
.....
5
PHASE 1 B. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 4,.7.
PAGES 80. 81. 82. AND 83 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUN'N, AS
THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN TriE :=OLLOWING COURSES ALONG I~E
NORTH UNE OF SAID LOT 12; NORTH 72046'44" WEST. 63.09 FE:T; SOUlri
63005' 12" WEST. 61.20 FE:T; SOUTH 53050'30" EAST, 4.28 FE:T; SOUTH
16008'58" EAST, 25.85 FE:T; SOUTri 36003'21" EAST, 19.28 FE:T; SOUTH
16006' 18" WEST. 18.15 FEET; SOUTH 17013'24" EAST, 23.03 FE:T; SOUlri
62056'25" WEST. 24.86 FE:T; SOUTH 65039'42. WEST, 22.91 FE:T; SOUlri
40051'22. WEST. 19.28 FEET: SOUTri 1404,.1'54" WEST, 39.45 FE:T; SOUTH
07028'11. WEST. 53.00 FEET: SOUTH 03054'47. EAST. 17.73 FEET; SOUTH
04032'01. WEST. 32.26 FEET; SOUTH 10023'42" EAST. 27.27 ~::T; SOUTH
21025'56. EAST. 25.94 FE:T: SOUTH 57013'53. EAST, 26.73 FE:T; SOUTH
22030'24. EAST. 30.02 FE:T; SOUTH 17032'14,." WEST. 34.51 FE:T; SOUTH
12034'08. WEST. 35.71 FE:T; SOUTH 20039'55" EAST. 50.30 FE:T; SOUTH
14047'38" WEST. 33.01 FE::""; SOUTH 38046'47. WEST. 36.56 FE::""; SOUTH
69023'30" WEST, 30.77 FE:T; SOUTH 83013'35. WEST, 31.96 FE:T; NORTH
83026'48. WEST. 29.09 FE:T;- SOUTH 86046'10. WEST. 122.80 F:=T; NORTH
87033'11" WEST, 45.67 ~e::""; SOUTH 69027'35. WEST, 21.26 FE:T; NORTH
87032'46. WEST, 146.71 FE:T; THENCE, DE?ARTlNG SAID NORTH LINE OF LOT
12. RUN NORTH 57024'04. EAST. 29.61 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 00047'25"
EAST, 484.46 FEET iO A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE RUN WESTERLY
AND THEN NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS LENGTri OF
750.00 P-cET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 138048'54". AN ARC LENGTH OF 1817.09
FEET. A <;HORD LENGTH OF 1404.16 Fe:: I, AND A CHORD BEARING OF NORTri
19016'44" WEST; THENCE RUN NORTH 49050'01" EAST. 419.30 FEET TO TriE
SOUTHERLY UNE OF TUSCAWIUA UNIT 7, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THE.~EOF,
AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 22. PAGES 46 AND 47 OF THE PUBUC RECORDS OF
SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN ALONG THE SOUTHERLY UNE OF
SAID TUSKAWILLA UNIT 7. SOUTH 70000'29" EAST, 664.21 FEET TO THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PLAT; THENCE RUN SOUTH 01007'52. EAST,
319.02 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89037'40" EAST, 520.75 FEET; THENCE RUN
SOUTH 14032'19. EAST. 1 69.91 ~:::""T; THENCE RUN SOUTH 71020'10. EAST,
164.74 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE PROPOSED
OVIEDO CROSSING TERRACE; THENCE RUN ALONG SAID PROPOSED WEST RIGHT-
OF-WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING COURSES; SOUTH 55015'44. WEST, 200.22 ~-:T
TO A CURVE CONCA\lE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE RUN SOUTHWESrdU-Y ALONG
SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS LENGTH OF 950.00 Fe::I. A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
19006'05., AN ARC LENGTH OF 316.71 FEET, A CHORD LENGTH OF 315.25 FC-:""T,
AND 'A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 4504Z41. WEST; THENCE RUN SOUTH
36009'39. WEST, 275.09 FEET TO A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE
RUN SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS LENGTH OF
800.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 17048'35", AN ARC LENGTH OF 248.67 FE:T,
A CHORD LENGTH OF 247.67 FC-%:""T, AND A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 27015'22.
WEST TO THE AFORESAID NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 12 AND THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
.
.
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND UES IN SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA AND CONTAINS
49.551 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
ALSO, LESS;
A TRACT OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 17. TOWNSHIP 21 SOUTH. RANGE 31 EAST. INCLUDING A
.
6
.
PORTION OF TI\ACT ~ A-AND TI\ACT ~F~. OVIE:::lO CROSSING - PHASE 1 A ACCORDING TO THE
?!...AT THEREOF AS RECORDEJ IN PLAT BOOK 47. PAGES 100 n-fROUGH 101, OF THE PUBLIC
RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBEJ AS
FOLLOWS:
.
COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TUSCAWILLA UNIT 7, ACCORDING
TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 22, PAGES 46 AND 47 OF
SAID PUBLIC RECORDS FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE RUN NORTH
01007'52~ WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID iUSCAWILLA UNIT 7. A
DISTANCE OF 1795.S3 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNE::! OF TUSCAWILLA UNIT
13, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 29, PAGES
1 AND 2 OF SAID PUBLIC RECORDS; THENCE RUN NORTH 88056'43" EAST,
AlONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TUSCAWIlLA UNIT 13, A DISTANCE OF 2743.37
FE:T; TriENCE RUN SOUTH 87046'09" EAST. ALONG SAID SOUTH UNE AND THE
SOUTH LINE OF TUSCAWILLA UNIT 14C, ACCORDING TO Tr-lE PLAT THEREOF AS
RECORDED IN PlAT BOOK 36, PAGES 11 AND 12 OF SAID PUBLIC RECORDS,
1 284.87 FEET TO A POINT ON niE WEST LIMITED ACCESS RIG;." -OF-WA Y LINE
OF THE SEMINOLE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY; THENCE RUN SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID
WEST LIMITED ACCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING COURSES: SOUTH
00047'59- EAST, 759.24 FE:T; SOu+H 20038'23" WEST, 827.08 FE:T; SOUTH
30011'15" EAST, 120.06 FEET; SOUTH 24052'30" WEST, 130.00 FE:i; NORTH
65007'48" WEST, SO.17 FEET: SOUTH 18000'45" WEST, 125.70 ~ei TO THE
POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE RUN
SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS LENGiH OF 850.00
~=I, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 41050'43", AN ARC LENGTH OF 620.79 FEET. A
CHORD LENGTH O~ 607.08 Fe" AND A CHORO BEARING OF SOUTH 38056'OS-
WEST TO THE POINT OF -TANGENCY; THENCE RUN SOUTH 59051'28" WEST,
133.05 FEET; THENCE, DEPARTING SAIO WEST LIMITED ACCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE, RUN NORTH 54041'46" WEST, 148.n FEEl TO THE MOST EASTERLY
CORNER OF TRACT -E" OF SAIO OVIEDO CROSSING - PHASE 1.0..; THENCE
CONTINUE NORTH 54041'46" WEST, ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID
TRACT "E". 543.96 FE:T TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF TRACT "0" OF SAID OVIEDO
CROSSING - PHASE 1 A; THENCE RUN ALONG THE EASTE::!L Y AND NORTHEML Y
LINES OF SAID TRACT -0", THE FOLLOWING COURSES: NORTH 24047'37" EAST,
83.65 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; .
THENCE RUN NORTHERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS L::~GTH OF
200.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 70017'57", AN ARC LENGTH OF 245.39 Fc'l,
A CHORD LENGTH OF 230.29 FE::! AND A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 10021'21"
WEST TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THEN~E RUN NORTH 45030'19" WEST,
87.70 FE..CT TO THE POINT OF CURVAiURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY;
THENCE RUN WESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, HA VtNG A RADIUS LENGTH OF
110.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 99035'26", AN ARC LENGTH OF 191.20 Fel,
A CHORD LENGTH OF 168,02 ~CCI ANO A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 84041'58"
WEST TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT "F" OF SAID OVIEDO CROSSING -
PHASE 1 A; THENCE. OE?ARTlNG SAIO NORTHERLY LINE OF TRACT "0.. RUN
SOUTHERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS LENGTH OF 110.00 FEET. A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 30044.'29-, AN ARC LENGTH OF 59.02 FE:I'. A CHORD
LENGTH OF 58.31 FEET AND A CHORO BEARING OF SOUTH 19032'01" '/fEST TO .
THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE RUN SOUTH 04009'47" WEST. 185.99 FEET
TO THE pdlNT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE
RUN SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS LENGTH OF
758.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 35018'45", AN ARC LENGTH OF 467.17 ~=1.
.
7
A CHORD LENGTri OF 459.81 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 21 '49'09"
WEST TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE RUN SOUTri 39028'32- WEST,
278.46 FEET; THENCE, RUN NORTH 90000'00- WEST, 335.46 FEET TO A POINT
ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE RUN
NORTHWESTEML Y, ALONG SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS LENGTH OF 570.00
FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 46032'56-. AN ARC LENGTH OF 463.08 FEET. A
CHORD LENGTH OF 450.45 FEET. AND A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 40013'55-
WEST TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE RUN NORTH 63030'23- WEST,
338.06 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURV A lURE OF A CURVE CONCA VE
NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE RUN NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE HAVING A
RADIUS LENGTH OF 763.65 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02036'57-. AN ARC
LENGTH OF 34.86 FEET. A. CHORD LENGTH OF 34.86 FE:T AND A CHORD
BEARING OF NORTH 62011'54- WEST; THENCE RUN SOUTri 29006'34- WEST.
RADiAl TO SAID CURVE. 110.00 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE CONCAVE
SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE RUN SOUTHEASteRLY. AlONG SAID CURVE, HAVING
A RADIUS LENGTH OF 40.00 FEET. A CENTRAl ANGLE OF 101021'50-. AN ARC
LENGTH OF 70.77 FEET. A c.."'lORD LENGTH OF 61.89 FE. AND A. CHORD
BEARING OF SOUTH 10012'31- EAST TO THE POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE
OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; r.-tENCE RUN SOUTHWESTERLY.
AlONG SAID CURVE HAVING A RAglUS LENGTH OF 450.00 Fel. A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 14047'20-, AN ARC LENGTH OF 116.15 FEET. A CHORD LENGTH OF
115.83 ~::::I AND A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 47052'04- WEST TO THE POINT
OF TANGENCY; THENCE RUN SOUTH 55015'44- WEST. 157.72 FEET; THENCE
RUN NORTH 71020'10- WEST 164.74 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 14'32'19-
WEST. 1 6'9.91 ~-=I; THENCE RUN NORTH 8903T4O- WEST, 520.75 F'c.ET; THENCE
RUN NORTH 01007:52- WEST. 319.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
.
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND UES IN SEMINOLE COUNTY. FLORIDA AND CONTAINS
195.853 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
.
AlSO. LESS;
A TRACT OF LAND LYING IN SECi10NS 16 AND 17. TOWNSHIP 21 SOUi'H, RANGE 31 EAST, BEING
A PORTION OF LOTS 1,2,3,6 AND 7 SLAVtA COLONY COMPANY SUBDMSION, ACCORDING TO
THE PLAT THEREOF p.s RECORDED IN PLATBOOK 2. PAGE 71. OF THE PUBWC RECORDS OF
SEMINOLE COUNTY. FLORIDA. DESCRlBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER .OF
SAlDSECTlON 16 FOR A POINT OF REFERENCE; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00059'55"
EAST. ALONG THE WEST UNE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER. 485.31 FEET TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN SOUTH OOo59'~ EAST. AlONG SAID
WEST LINE. 866.98 FE:.! TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE
RUN NORTH 89041 '2S- EAST, AlONG THE NORTH UNE OF SAID LOTS 1 AND 2, A
DISTANCE OF 1268.60 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE OF THE C.S.x.
RAILROAD; THENCE RUN SOUTH 23026"17"' WEST, AlONG SAID WEST RlGHT-OF-
WAY UNE. 502.55 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH UNE OF THE NORTH 460.00
Fc::T OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89041'25" WEST, AlONG SAID SOUTH
UNE, 386.43 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST UNE OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE RUN
NORTH 01 DOO'17"' WEST, AlONG SAID WEST UNE. 197.32 FEET TO A POINT ON THE
SOUTH UNE OF THE NORTH 262.69 FEET OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE RUN SOUTH
89D41'25" WEST. AlONG SAID SOUTH LINE. 281.76 FEET: THENCE RUN SOUTH
73015'07" WEST. 407.75 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST UNE OF SAID LOT 2;
.
8
.
.
.
THENCE RUN NORTH 00059'55'" WEST, ALONG SAlD WEST LINE. 0.56 1'-= T:
THENCE. DEPARTING SAID WEST UNE. RUN SOUTr-i 73022''S- WEST, 25.96 ~=I;
THENCE RUN SOUTH 00059'55'" EAST, PARA1..I..EL WITH AND 25.00 r-= I WEST OF
(pERPENDICUlAR MEASURE) THE EAST UNE OF SAlD LOT 3. A DISTANCE OF
226.37 FE::.i; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89048'34- WEST. 138.94 F= I; THENCE RUN
SOUTH 52005'06" EAST, 68.70 FE::1 TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID LOT
3; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89048'00" WEST, ALONG SAlD SOUTH UNE, 448.15 FE::i TO
A POINT ON THE EAST UMITED ACCESS RlGHT-OF.WAY UNE OF STATE ROAD #417
(SEMINOLE COUN1Y EX?RESSWA Y); THENCE RUN ALONG SAlD EAST LIMITED
ACCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE THE FOLLOWING COURSES: NORTH 02008'53- EAST.
155.97 FEET; NORTH 10.34'09" EAST, 308.38 r-:: I; NORTH 18023'56" EAST, 902.33
F-=i; NORTH 0705:;)'""20. EAST. 102.61 FEET; NORTH 23ofrss- WEST, 36.86 r-=1;
NORTH 19043'45" EAST, 130.00 FEET, SOUTH 70016'15" EAST, 150.28 FE::1 TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND UES IN SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA AND CONTAlNS
22.673 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
~'sem
07"3/00
--
9
":>
2:
~
j
.
: I I
.~~
~
.
Legend
-."- Seminole CountY Jurisdiction
--.-
--- --=:::
City of Oviedo Jurisdiction
PscaI19
Offic:
.
~,~. -~ City ofW'mt.=r Springs Jurisdiction
1:::::::::::::::::::::::::1 Wetland Conservation Area
.---
Exhibit B
L\ND OSB BY JURISDICIlCN
City of Oviedo
Lad U..
R<:miI
R<:miI
Toad
SF
I SF
I 400.000 SF
City oiW"U1lI:r Springs
Lad U.. I Pm:d
R.azlIOlIiao I 14
Toa!
SF
SF
Notes:
Seminole CooIlIy
Lmd U.. Pm:d 1.-\aeqDI~ .
RamWf5c:o iLS '7.$ I jIl.ooo SF
R.azlIOlIiao 16 15.1 I JU..IDl SF
R.azlIOlIiao 17 LZ 1 1?.?oo SF
oma. 18 14.2 I~SF
Offiao 19 3J I 377SOSF
RctoiL'Ot6<:o 2l) 1l.4 I 2.710 SF
RctoiL'Ot6<:o 121A 1.4 5.683 SF
~ 21B 11.9. 12!.634 SF
oma. Z2 5.4 39,1JlllSF
~ 23 0.9 12.2lI' SF
~ 24 2.6 I~SF
RctoiL'Ot6<:o 25 1.0 :ul6 SF
~ 26 13.0 Jll.662 SF
~ 'D LS.6 104.911 51'
0.120 BcdI
RaaiIIOftIao 21 1.1 11..;:00 SF
RaaiIIOftIao 29 1.2 I 8.611 51'
RaaiIIOftIao 30 1.4 7lXX1 SF
RaaiIIOftIao J1 1.6 LS.ooo 51'
RaaiIIOftIao J2 1.6 I !i..700 51'
kademW 36 W -'DU
TOTAL 72.7 Sl1037I 51'
0.120 BcdI
400
(1) IDclla:ieI. bar ia -Iimilzd tD 0lIk:e. c::micd pdtIeo. GIll 11{> tD. l2O-Oed
!bpiral. Tho affica alIDpoacal willliD Pm:d Z1 Wl::JJl ~ 7S.ooo SF or 1
0I:RlL
CZ) Tho CD<t laadaQ at """'-fa tD be tclDllO'ed ill pgca(' 1~ IIIIl7 chmp . Ibe
lima olfiDallila pIamiq GIll ~ fIl JJG <:qC\, ~ will :IlD ac:cqo ..
be i:mpEud =-i 1.0 oae.
(3) A Imlt - aqa:inIo:acy -=n ana.. fi:lr Ibe c>:dlo::&II atl'l:lllil m4 afflco ..-
bcro1eca pom:ia. Tho m-m Il'Pfeo .. dlaups Il<lweca Pa:a:cIs IJ. IS. 16, 17. 20.
n.. Zlb. m4 23-32. PIICCio Ill. 19. m4 Z2 mquDe'" ~ tD Ibe PUt) m4
.... -1lIbjD::r II> rl>D .....u. .
LAND USE BY PHASE
,7
, I P=d(.) ~ I~~~
Lm4lJ..
l'HA3IJ 1. m41b APP!lOVED I I I
Rtuiit'Of!lm I 20. 21a. Zlb. 23.1.4. 2S.129.J ~SI' 12.200
26. 28- 29 JO. 31 J2
omo. I Ill. 19 Z2 i23 l26.8OO 51' 1300
SOIm"ANTW. DHVIAT:cN
PHk"B :z CD>>-2lXl2l I I
R<Uil.~ I 12. 16. 11 lot.4 U4O,IJlll SF 1.300
1 I'D LS.6 104.911 51' (1) 6SO
PBAsS J I
Raailr-omm I 13. 14. l.S 46..0 419.lXXJ SF l.m
Haoa::.al 'D . o tD 120 BcdI ZAG
R.c:aida.tid 36 1.3 '4DU .
SUMMARY OPIAND OSB
I...md 1Jae ~.) 1Rt<,.,~" ~
i3p.",,'-
~ 12.13. 14.l.S. 16, 17.211
:: 2lb, 23.z.4. 25.16. 176.S UCl'J.J97 SP Il1350
29 JQ, 31. n
om... I&. 19 Z2 12.9 l26.8OO SP 6llO
~ 'D LS.6 104311 SP 6$0
OlD 120 Bcala 2AO
~ 36 1.3 40U .
~~P!ts . 4&.6
w~~ . &9.3
~azdCiDIIS- . 20.2
. 36.0
~.w.... I . JQ.I
TOT.~1. I 43l.2 IA4lO
__ . ~1ll!IS ~~
. - SCAtZ~PaT CD Semmole County Map H
~ \J./ Master De
o ;m -r:O mJKnl velopment PIan
-o.\c...,.,_..o;.. ~ -C~.ocr'\=.._~~,.':'wC _ ~ ;=:: .t.,,....
ANGUN
LOF-Z
~.l.i.'i'":'"
.
...
hIt
......
,.....
Exhlhlt C
.,
.,
I
EQUIV AI~ENCV MA'I'Rbc
Oviedo Mllkc','.lco
Tn . n,..1I . ......11 ......1. Will' ',clIl lIIell Tin qualll, ollloe . . orne. Ollie. lIlIIll.
rllUM II.... (. - 4'lCa~ (I..'.I(S'" U"-." KII.l Ilal. lit... 0.... t.-., Kan (II'." Hal') tI..-." K8Pl J!!.!'J!itTI')
II.... 1.00 PH 0.01 KSF 0.10 KSP OJI KSI' e.o1 KSI' 0.04 K3P 0.01 lUll' . 0.10 Kill' 0.20 IClP 0.2' KIIP o.Th III
0...11 ("~' le8!') 11.41 011 1,00 lCap . 1.4d KSP -nWr UO KSP UO~ U4 K9P . J~41 KIIP UIJ lesE' UIKSr -nn(sp
" (I'." KSP)- u4 b-U- UIJ KBF . ~. '.00 KSP --[2 KSI' 0.21 KSP -OJ K P e:n 1C9P - -'~Cii-KSP -UlJ KSP 2.61 Kap . f.Of"KSP
(I".." lesn 1.ld P1I O.!li~I!~ -!:1~ ICSP I.do J{SI' 0." KSP .,44 I(SP OJ1 Rw- -:o:iORsp I.S1 KSP 2.01 KSI' 2Jn'9r
P... r..o" n.... .1.0' 011 fiiKsp . -----t~rnp '.12 K.8P -':'0 KsP 2.41 Kmr- t41 k8P - . UIJ lCap 'IU4 leap n.1T"R8p r-!UI ICsr
~~!!on!!L- lUo bu 1.24 KSr I. imP U' (C5P '.h UP l.40 IC$I' UO IeSP . '.11 K8P UlJ ~SP ~.11 ICBP -LtlKsP
i. ..!I".lIly ilU.. IJ.I' IlU u~ ICSP U, leftp 1.1' Kap ,.U kSP ..,1 KSP . -roOKSP =t]fKSP 1TfY8r U1ICSP UrKsr-
~lI1c. (!:4' In-- -nJ IlU OllbP e." KSP. -T1J'1:Sp I.U ICSF -Tn K3' hi 1C3P :oi1cBr --r.i6i{3p 2:10 K8P 2:i,Riir
(SI." Ie P) -na DU O.J UP. '.'0 till' ...4 kill', '.10 ISP U. III' 1.)1 KSP --rn ItF too K~t- I.U K3P ----r.il KSF
(III.." ICsn u.nu u UP . d. frsI' '.41 K8P . :.::~C 1.11 8P ,2 KBP.' 1.31 (sP e.n ifiip. 1.00 KBP I.\~r
I iII..1t~ leU) Ut IlU 01 KSP . O.U kB; Ul ICSP 0.11 91' .2 ..U SP Ud ICBI' 0,11 KSP. 1.00 9P-
.....Uu .
Ilotol (I rGOAI)
&4,11 (0-49 K~P)
('0-99 OP) "
(100-199 UP) .
1''''1'00<1 Ile... (KSl')
1II....rlO R.... (JBr)
. Qu.IIIV 1lat"(~P)
Oflloci (0-49 )
. ('0.99 le8P) .
(IOQ.I99 K81')
(2110-199 KDP)
.., ....-n.... .
.....PIrM.....
....
UU
5.140 .
.uoo .,
2.141
11.4.1
.','1'
UII .
.J."q
I.IU
1.161
1..91
I.'
I
. '.
, '.
,
. ..
'. .
. ...
. . I
"
."
Sulu:""; 01'1111"6 JQ()"OII r.,..,,- ".'''' I.oJMI Rb../lQI" I"",
n'li )',11' a"..MlIon ft.,."" 6111 (a'JII/tNt
i .
'..
", "
.
.
Appendix B
Amended Settlement Agreement
.
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 2001
..
."
AMENDF.D SF:T'TI.F.MF:NT A GR F.F.MF.NT
.
THIS AMENDED SETILEMENT AGREEMENT (hereinafter. the "Agreement") is
hereby entered into thiS''''"" day Of~. 1995. by and between the CITY OF OVIEDO,
a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida (hereinafter,
"Oviedo"). and the CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS. a municipal corporation organized and
existing under the laws of the State of Florida (hereinafter, "Winter Springs"), and THE VIERA
COMPANY. a Florida corporation (hereinafter." "Viera"). and ROUSE-ORLANDO. INC., a
Maryland corporation authorized to do business in Florida (hereinafter. "Rouse") <Oviedo, Winter
Springs, Viera. and Rouse are hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Parties").
\I
WIT N E SSE T H:
WHEREAS. Oviedo and Winter Springs wish to provide for better inter-governmental
relations and coordinate planning effons. as authorized pursuant to Section 163.01. Fla. Stat.; and
.
WHEREAS. Pan II of Chapter 163. Fla. Stat.. and as a corollary thereto, Rule 9]-5.
Florida Administrative Code. address the need for an efficient and orderly system of planning and
growth management by and among governmental entities and subdivisions thereof to ensure
continued growth while preserving and enhancing the publiC welfare: and
WHEREAS. Sections 163.01(4) and (5), Fla. Stat.. provide that a public agency of.the
state, as defined by Section 163.01(3), may exercise jointly by contraCt with any other public
agency of the state any power. privilege or authority which such agencies share in common and
which each might exercise separately; and
7 19 rcYlSlUft by ~~ 6; Auoaala
.
WHEREAS. Oviedo and Winter Springs are public agencies within the meaning of Section
l63.0113l. Fla. Stat.: and
wHEREAS. Oviedo and Winter Springs are both locaIed in Seminole County. Florida and
.
ponions of each city are contiguous to ponions of the other city: and
WHEREAS. Oviedo has entered into an Agreement with Viera and Rouse dated November
21. 1994 (hereinafter, the. "Pre-Annexation Agreement"): and
WHEREAS, the Pre-Annexation Agreement contemplates that a 1.2 million square feet
regional shopping center will be developed on larid which is located in unincorporated Seminole
County (hereinafter. the "Mall") and that such land. together with contiguous land thereto (but
not including Parcel 14 as desaibed hereinafter)-. will be annexed into Oviedo as more panicularly
described in the Pre-Annexation Agreement; and
~~~
,-
WHEREAS. the panies hereto intend and desire that Parcel 14. as describelbe annexed
into Winter Springs: and
WHEREAS. the Mall is a portion of a larger project which is a Development of Regional
.
Impact (hereinafter. "DRI"). Viera has heretofore received development approvals for the DR!
from Seminole County. Florida. pursuant to Section 380.06. Fla. Stat. The real propeny on
which the DR! project is located is described on ):'1I'hihit "A" attaehed hereto and incorporated
herein: and
WHEREAS. Viera has applied to Seminole County for additional approvals concerning
the DR! project including. without limitation. an amendment to the Seminole County
Comprehensive Plan, an amendment to the existing DR! Development Order (as defmed in the
Pre-AMexation Agreement) and the existing master plan for the DR! project which is attaChed
7/19 revision ~ ~lbM:hcr. ~
2
.
.
thereto. and various other permits. approvals and development orders to allow the DR! project to
be developed as provided in the Oviedo Crossing Development of Regional Impact Application
for Development Approval dated November 1994, as the same has been or might be modified (all
the foregoing applications being jointly hereinafter referred to as the "Land Use Approvals").
The development. as may be ultimately modified by the Land Use Approvals. shall hereinafter
be referred to as the "Project": and
WHEREAS. Winter Springs is the grantee of a ten (10) foot conservation easement
pursuant to that cenain Easement between Winter Springs Development Joint Venture and Winter
Springs recorded September 17. 1993, in Official Records Book 2648, Page 0039. Public Records
of Seminole County. Aorida (hereinafter. the "Conservation Easement"; the lands subject to the
Conservation Easement are hereinafter referred to as the "Conservation Easement Area"): and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the Pre-Annexation Agreement. Oviedo has filed suit
against Winter Springs in Seminole County Circuit Coun for the purpose of condemning the
Conservation Easement so as to allow the construction of a public right-of-way; and
WHEREAS. Winter Springs has filed suits against Oviedo and Rouse and Viera in
cOMection with the Pre-Annexation Agreement; and
WHEREAS. Winter Springs and Oviedo and Viera and Rouse desire to provide for an
amicable settlement of such suits: and
WHEREAS. the Slate of Aorida has adopted the Local Government Comprehensive
. Planning and Land Development Regulation Act (hereinafter, the "Growth Management Act")
which is codified in Section 163.3161 et seq.. Aa. Stat. 0993. as amended); and
.
7/19 ~ '" ~1bM:h<<a. ~
3
..
.
WHEREAS. the Growth Management Act requires local governments to coordinate and
cooperate with respect to projects which have multi-jurisdictional impacts: and
WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plans for Winter Springs and Oviedo require coordination
between the twO cities in connection with projects which have multi-jurisdictional impacts: and
WHEREAS. the Growth Management Act requires cooperation between municipalities and
other governments to assure coordination of their respective planning and development activities:
and
WHEREAS. Policy 64.10 of the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council
Comprehensive Regional Policy Plan (hereinafter. the "Comprehensive Regional Policy Plan")
calls for interloca1 solutions to tranSponation needs. including the impacts of a development
project in one jurisdiction on an adjacent jurisdiction: and
WHEREAS. Policy 65.5 of the Comprehensive Regional Policy Plan calls for
intergovemmerual coordination to assure that multi-jurisdictional impacts are properly addressed:
and
WHEREAS. the State Comprehensive Plan requires cooperation between. among and
within all levels of Florida government: and
WHEREAS. if the Project is developed in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.
then Winter Springs and. Oviedo determine that the Project and the benefits of the Project are in
the public intereSl: and
7/19 f'CY\SIOft by ~.-ctI<< 6; .woa-
4
.
.
.
.
WHEREAS. the Project provides certain economic development benefits to the region
including. but not limited to, significant job creation, increase of ad valorem tax base, increase
of sales tax revenue. increase of gas tax revenue. construction and expansion of public facilities
and infrastructure at private expense. and numerous other benefits: and
WHEREAS, in consideration of this Agreement. the Parties have agreed to terminate all
pending litigation between the Parties as described herein and to take such other action z,s is
contemplated by this Agreement: and
WHEREAS, Viera and Rouse have executed this Agreement in order to facilitate certain
of the undertakings of Winter Springs and Oviedo as specified herein and to perform the
undertakings of Viera and Rouse as hereinafter set forth and to receive the benefits set forth
herein: and
WHEREAS. . in consideration of the foregoing. each of Oviedo and Winter Springs
acknowledge that this Agreement is in the public interest and serves a valid municipal purpose:
and
.
WHEREAS. each of the Parties hereto represents and warrants to the others that it has
complied with all procedural and substantive legal requirements and has the legal authority to
execute and perform the terms of this Agreement: and
WHEREAS. the Parties have previo~ly entered into that certain Settlement Agreemeat
dated March 24. 1995 (hereinafter, the "Settlement Agreement"): and
WHEREAS. the Settlement Agleemenl contemplates development of the Project including
a road connecting the Mall to Winter Springs Boulevard: and
7/19 rcWian by ~1Mc:hcr. ~
5
.
WHEREAS. as a resull of recent hearings held by the Seminole County Board of County
Conunissioners (hereinafter. "Seminole County"). Viera and Rouse have modified the plans for
the Project by substituting in place of direct vehicular access to. Winter Springs Boulevard. a
public road which would begin at State Road 426. include a bridge over the Central Florida
<;ireeneway. and run through the Project to Red Bug Lake Road. all as depicted in the revised
plans attached hereto and incorporated herein as J;'yhihit "RIO (the "Bridge Road"); and
WHEREAS, the Parnes desire to replace the Settlement Agreement with this Agreement.
which address the changes in the Project. including without limitation provisions concerning the
Bridge Road:
NOW THEREFORE. in consideration of the premises hereof and the mutual covenants
contained herein. and good and other valuable consideration. the receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged by the Panies. the panies hereto agree as follows:
1. RFr.ITAf S The above recitals are trUe and corTeCt and are incorporated herein
and made a pan of this Agreement.
2. NOV A. TlON The Settlement Agreement including all exhibits attaChed thereto
is hereby superseded and replaced in its entirety by this Agreement. Upon execution of this
Agreement. the Settlement Agreement shall be of no further force and effect.
3. nF.VJ:'f.nPMJ:'NT R~I~nNs.. Wi1h respect to that panion of the Project
which abuts the southern and eastern portions of Tuscawilla as shown on the Master Development
Plan attached hereto as F.yhihit "R," the following restrictions shall apply:
(a) n,.y,.lnpmmL No develo~.n~.~~clu~i_~~~~~~~.'._~..~i~di~gs or other
active uses (but excluding water rerention and detention and drainage facilities) will
7119 rev..- by KNtot-~ A ~
6
..
.
.
.
9--!~:~~~ ~.~
be permitted within 250 feet of the bounda~._~twe_~~!_P.roj:c~~d !.~J.~cent
.E~j~ential u~es.
(b) Hpighk: Building heights shall not exceed 35 feet within 275 feet of the boundary
of the adjacent residential uses. 45 feel within 300 feet of the boundary. nor 65 feet
for the remainder of the said parcels which are adjacent to Tuscawilla.
(c) w.an. A 6-foot high masonry wall and 4-inch caliper trees. planted on 4O-foot
centers will be included in the buffer area shown on the Master Development Plan.
where existing natural vegetation does not exist.
4. RIJ(F. P A. TH A. NO PF.OF_~ fA. N W A. I KW A. V In the interest of safety. and
to promote alternative forms of tranSpOft8lion. Viera and Rouse shall provide a system for cyclist
and pedestrian circulation on the Project site. Comfonable and direct walkways and bikeways
shall be constrUcted between the Mall. peripheral retail and the roads adjacent to the Project.
Bikeways which satisfy current state standards shall be COMected at Project entranceS with
.
adjacent external bicycle systems (if existing). Provided. however. notwithstanding the foregoing.
no bikeways shall be constrUcted on any propertY outside the real property described on F.~hihit
::.c. Funher. if (and only if) after consultation with their respective professional consultants each
of the Panies determines it is reasonable and feasible to connect bikeways between the Project and
Northern Way and such a coMedion can be accomplished at reasonable cost (and without
relocation of dninage facilities and canals) and will not create a safety hazard. then Viera and
Rouse shall do so. Appropriate signage identifying bike routes will be insWled. If the Panies
are unable to agree whether a connection can be accomplished at reasonable cost and without
relocation of drainage facilities and canals and will not creaJe a safety hazard. then they shall refer
71'9_by~.~
7
.
lhe dispule to the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council for mediation. in accordance
with the terms of Paragraph 20 hereinafter.
5. FINANCIAl. RF.NFF~ TO WINTF:R ~PRING~ The Parties acknowledge .
that there will be sources of revenue for Winter Springs as the Project builds out. such as, without
limitation. the following:
(a) ~1f'!C Ta..s:~ It is anticipated that the first year the Project is built out the amount of sales
taX revenue remitted from the State of Florida to Winter Springs which is attributable to
the Projea shall be approxim8lely Eighty-Four Thousand Dollars ($84,000). it is further
anticipated that the amount of revenue so remitted to Winter Springs will increase each
year.
(b) Im~rt P_ The developer of Parcel 14 (as defmed in Paragraph 9 hereinafter) shall pay
impact fees to Winter Springs in accordance with applicable ordinances. Viera and Rouse
agree that such impact fees may be used by Winter Springs for any purpose it desires,
(c)
notwithstanding the provisions of any impact fee ordinance to the contrary.
Ad VSllnr~m Ta..s:. It is anticipated that Parcel 14 will be developed to allow for the
consauction of approximately 50,000 square feet of office use and 57,000 square feet of
.
retail use. Based on standard planning assumptions. it is anticipated that the ad valorem
taX revenue attributable to said parcel will be approximately $40,000 per year.
(d) ~hnnk. It is anticipated that the Project will contribute a sum of money in ad valorem
taxes to the Seminole County school system at buildout, which inures directly to the
benefit of the citizens of Winter Springs. Oviedo and Seminole County.
7/19 ~ by Know-...... ..woa-
8
.
.
6. IMPAf:T FEE...CR.EDITS. Oviedo acknowledges and agrees that Viera and Rouse
(and other developers within the Project) are entitled to and shall receive transponation impact fee
credits for the costs of design and construction of (i) aU the portions of Oviedo Crossing Terrace
West (as shown on the Master Plan anached hereto as F~hihit "R") which are located nonh of
Red Bug Lake Road. (ii) the Bridge Road (from State Road 426 to Red Bug Lake Road). and (im
various other roads, consistent with Oviedo's codes and ordinances.
7. MITI(;ATION OF IMPAr~ OF PRO.lFrT ON WINTFR SPRINGS
(a) ImpArt Minglltinn F__ Winter Springs anticipates that, as a result of the Project, it will
incur additional municipal costS. In order to defray the costs thereof. subject to the tenns
and oonditions set out hereinafter Viera and/or Rouse shall make (or cause to be made) a
one-time. lump sum payment (the "lmpllM Mitig,atinri F~") to Winter Springs in the
amount of ONE HUNDRED FIFTY-TIlOUSAND AND NOIlOO DOLLARS
($150.000.00) if the Project as modified to include the Bridge Road is approved by
Seminole County and the Florida Department of Community Affairs (and all appeals are
resolved in a manner which permit constrUCtion of the Project. including the Mall. and the
Bridge Road). and the firs building pennit is issued for venical improvements on the Mall
site (Parcel 12 on Exhibit B). Said payment may be used for any municipal purposes
determined by Wanlel'Springs. Said payment shall be made within ten (10) days after the
first building pennit is issued for vertical improvements on the Mall site (Parcel 12 on
.
Fyhihit "8").
Funher. withili ten nO) days after the fint building pennit is issued for vertical
improvements on the Mall site (Parcel 12 on F~hihit "R") and after issuance of all the
7/19 rev~ by ""'.......liIlIdIcr ot: .~
9
--
.
permits for the Bridge Road. Viera and Rouse shall execute and record in the Public
Records of Seminole County, Florida, a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions
.
encwnbering the ponion of the Project property then owned by them providing that Viera.
Rouse. their sua::essors and assigns. and any sllccessnrs-in-title to the ponion of the Project
owned by them shall never construct roads or other improvements within the ponion of
the Conservation Easement Area located west of the Central Florida Greeneway, without
~ prior wriaen consem of Winter Springs. Notwilhstallding the foregoing. provided .he
~ject is approved hy Seminole County in accordance wilh the applications for the Land
Use Approvals, the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions shall be recorded in the
Public Records of Seminole County, Florida not later than ten days after the first
cenificale of occupancy for the Mall is issued. even if all the permits for the Bridge Road
have not been issued. The form of the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions is
attaehed as Fyhihit "r. "
(b) ~Irit.)'- In order to !leCW'e payment of the Impact Mitigation Fee to Winter Springs the .
Parties agree that no cenificate of occupancy for the Mall (including the depanment stores
therein) shall be requested. issued or accepted until the Impact Mitigation Fee is paid as
described above. Oviedo shall be under no obligation to issue a cenifiC8le of occupancy
unless it has received a copy of the check used to pay the Impact Mitigation Fee (or other
reasonable evidence of payment if the payment is not by check).
(c) Ind"rnnit.y- In the event Rouse and/or Viera fails to pay the Impact Mitigation Fee and
Oviedo declines or refuses to issue a certificate of occupancy as required by this Section
7 due solely to the failure to pay. then Viera arvJIor Rouse shall defend Oviedo against any
7/19 revdIOIllry ~.. ,\DONIa
10
.
.
.
.
(d)
action brought by any pany seeking to compel issuance of said cenificate of occupancy
and shall hold Oviedo hannless from any damages. judgments. losses or consequences
arising out of Oviedo I s compliance with the tenns of this Section 7.
Nn Cnna-n.mnn Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary. if the Mall
is not built, then no Impact Mitigation Fee shall be paid to Winter Springs.
8. QBFFNFW A. V TOI I ~ Oviedo and Winter Springs agree that it is in the mutual
interests of both_ communities to facilitate the use of the GreeneWay and the regional
transportation system. Both cities agree that the tolls on the GreeneWay act to inhibit its use.
Consequently, the cities agree that they shall work: together in order to eliminate or reduce the
tolls on the GreeneWay within the vicinity of each community.
9. A.NNF.XA.TION I~C;;ITF~
(a)
Pst..-l 14 Simultaneously with execution of this Agreement by all Pames (or earlier at
Viera I s sole option). Viera shall prepare and execute a petition (hereinafter. the "Parcel
14 Petition") to voluntarily annex into the City of Winter Springs Parcel 14 of the Project
together with an adjacent conservation area and a small adjacent upland parcel all as more
particularly shown on the DR! Masaer Development Plan attaehed hereto and incorporated
herein as F~hihit "R " The property which will be the subject of the Parcel 14 Petition
is referTed to in this Agreement as "Pared 14." Viera shall deliver the Parcel 14 Petition
to Kruppenb8cher & Associates. Inc., 340 North Orange Avenue. Orlando. Rorida 32801
(hereinafter. the "Escrow Agent") to be held in escrow. subject to the tenns and
conditions of this Section 9.
7'19 ~ by Kr..,.,...1IbM:hcr . AIIocWa
11
~
:p
ln consideration of Winter Springs' compliance with its obligations set out herein.
including but not limited to those set out in Paragraph II hereinafter. if Seminole County .
approves all the applications for the Land Use Approvals. then ninety (90) days after
Seminole County issues all such approvals and renders the Amended Development Order
to the Florida Depanment of Community Affairs and the East Central Florida Regional
Planning Council (and only then), Escrow Agent shall deliver the Parcel 14 Petition to
Winter Springs. Winter Springs and Viera shall take such action as is appropriate to
consummate the annexation and to consider such Land Use Approvals including the
Development Order required by Section 380.06 Fla. SW.. for Parcel 14 as is contemplated
by this Agreement and the applications for the Land Use Approvals being processed by
Viera. The panies acknowledge that Winter Springs has no rights and shall have no rights
with respect to approval of any portion of the Project except Parcel 14 (following the
completion of the aMexation of Parcel 14 into Winter Springs).
Winter Springs may, but shall not be required to. provide mtmicipal services to said .
Parcel 14; if it does not provide services it shall enter into an interlocal agreement with
another governmental entity which agrees to provide such services; Viera and Rouse shall
be third party beneficiaries of the Agreement.
If this Agreement is terminated and/or Winter Springs fails to perfonn its
obligations hereunder. then the Parcel 14 Petition shall be returned to Viera and Rouse and
Parcel 14 shall not be annexed.
Prior to the annexation of Parcel 14 Viera shall disclose the tenns and conditions
of this Section 9(a) to all its purchasers. tenants and mongagees of Parcel 14. and shall
7/\9...- by ~obec:hor A ~
12
.
.
convey the property described in the Parcel 14 Petition subject to this Section 9. If Viera
fails to do so, then Winter Springs may terminate this Agreement. Funher. this
Agreement shall be recorded in the Public Records of Seminole County, Florida as
provided in Paragraph 21 hereinafter.
(b) Additinnal Ag..-m"'nt rnnf''''rning Ann..ntinn Oviedo agrees that it shall not object
to the pelition for annexation described above and any petition for de annexation from
Oviedo int9 Winter Springs filed by any owners of the parcel(s) of property bounded by
Seneca Boulevard on the west. Winter Springs Blvd. on the south. the Central Florida
GreeneWay on the east and the Chelsea Woods subdivision on the nonh, as allowed by
law. In the event such petitions are filed, then Oviedo shall cooperate with respect to any
legal requirements regarding deannexation.
10. I.AW~J~
. (a) OviMn
.
Within fifteen (15) days of the execution of this Agreement by all Panies hereto.
Oviedo shall dismiss without prejudice or abate Case No. 95-259-CA-13-B filed
in the CiraJit Court for the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Seminole County.
Florida. When the Mall is opened for business to the public. Oviedo sha1I dismiss
the case ~th p-ejudice and the Parties shall authorize. properly execute and deliver
mutual releases with respect to Case No. 95-259-CA-13-B. each pany to bear its
own attorneys fees and costs.
(2) The Panies acknowledge and agree that the agreements represented by this
Agreement are in settlement of allegations and claims assened by Oviedo in the
(1)
7/19 ~ by ~~A ADo..-.-
13
.
above-referenced litigation. which allegations and claims are contested by Winter
Springs. The Panies acknowledge and agree that. by executing this Agreement, .
neither Oviedo nor Winter Springs are admitting to any liability in the respective
lawsuits and that. should this Agreement be cancelled. terminated, held invalid. or
not enforced for any reason. neither this Agreement nor any of the negotiations
concerning it are admissible into evidence in any subsequent litigation, nor shall
this Agreement be CQI'lSU'Ued as a waiver of any of the panies I rights regarding and
arising out of the above-referenced litigation.
(b) Wintfl!r ~prinv.
(1) Within fifteen (15) days of the execution of this Agreement by all Panies hereto,
Winter Springs shall abate or dismiss Case No. 94-2405 and Case No. 95-319
(2)
which it has filed in the Circuit Coun of the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit in and for
Seminole County. Florida. When the ~arcel 14 Petition has been delivered to
Wimer Springs and the Impact Mitigation Fee has been paid to Winter Springs as
descnbed above. Winter Springs shall immediately dismiss said lawsuits with
prejudice and the panies to the lawsuits shall authorize. properly execute, and
deliver mutual releases with respect to all panies to the litigation. each party to
bear its own attorneys fees and costS.
Winter Springs represents that it has not filed any other lawsuits that directly or
indirectly affect the Project. or that name Ro~. Viera. and/or Oviedo (and/or its
City Conunission) as a partY. Provided Rouse and Viera are not in default of their
obligations hereunder. Winter Springs also agrees not to file any lawsuits.
1/19~byKn.tot-~.~
14
.
.
administrative proceedings. or take any other action which will inhibit Rouse
and/or Viera from obtaining the Land Use Approvals as contem'plated herein.
The Panies acknowledge and agree that the agreements represented by this
Agreement are in settlement of allegations and claims assened by Winter Springs
in the above-referenced litigation. which allegations and claims are contested by
Oviedo, Rouse and Viera. The Parties acknowledge and agree that. by executing
this Agreement. neither Oviedo. Rouse nor Viera are admining to any liability in
the respective lawsuits and that, should this Agreement be cancelled. terminated.
held invalid. or not enforced for any reason, neither this Agreement nor any of the
negotiations concerning it are admissible into evidence in the litigation.
(c) Agr-"'Hlt Nothing herein is intended to prevent any pany from entering this Agreement
into the record in any land use proceeding.
11. A PPROV A I PRnr~ In considerati~n of the undertakings and commitments
described in this Agreement. and so long as there is no default by Rouse or Viera under this
Agreement, Winter Springs and Oviedo each agree to not object to the approval of the Project by
governmental entities including without lirniwion Seminole County. the East Central F10rida
Regional Planning Council and the F10rida Depanment of Community Affairs. The foregoing
shall include. but noc be limited to. leaers to be Sent by W"utter Springs and Oviedo to each of said
agencies either indicating that the respective City does not oppose the Project. In addition. a
representative of Winter Springs and Oviedo shall appear at all public hearings to affmn its
.
.
(3)
7/19 r_ br Knoppalbacher A AImciaIa
15
.
position. Winter Springs shall also advise all agencies to whom it has heretofore sent
correspondence adverse to the Project that the previous adverse comments have been withdrawn
and that it does not oppose the Project.
L2. A'M'ORNF.VS WF_'"
~a) Wintl"r Sprinv. Upon delivery to Viera and Rouse of fully-executed copies of this
Agreement, Viera and Rouse shall deliver to Kruppenbacher and Associates the sum of
Fifty Th~usand Dollars ($50.000) to defray the cost of legal fees incurred by Winter
Springs in connection with the Project.
(b) Ovipdn Rouse and Viera shall pay all fees due and owing from Oviedo to Pinel &.
Carpenter and Gray, Harris &. Robinson concerning the Project (not to exceed Fony Five
Thousand Dollars ($45,000)). Rouse and Viera shall also pay to Oviedo Five Thousand
DoUars (SS.OOO) to defray additional legal fees incurred by Oviedo in connection with the
Project.
13.
OF-FA11l T
(a) RMnHlip-c In the event of a default (i.e. a failure to perfonn any tenn of this Agreement>
by any partY hereCo. the norHiefaulting partY or parties shall have such rights and remedies
provided by law and equity, including a separate contraCtUal right to injunctive relief.
(b) W.iVf!r. 'The waiver of any breach or'default under any of the terms of this Agreement
shall not be deemed to be, nor shall the same constitute, a waiver of any subsequent breach
or default.
(c) Nnti~ Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections (a) and (b) above. before exercising
any remedy at law or equity, a non-defaulting pany shall provide written notice to the
7119 ~ by KlupPCIlMch<< a. ADocsaIa
16
.
.
.
other panies of an asserted default and the asserted defaulting party shall have the right to
.
cure the asserted default within thirty (30) days.
(dl
Attnrnpy'" F_ In the event thaI suit is brought by any party to enforce the terms of this
Agreement, then the prevailing party bringing such action shall be entitled to an award of
reasonable attorney I s fees. legal assistant fees and coun costs at all trial and appellate
levels. against the party from whom a remedy was sought.
14. N~T1rF. Any notice required or allowed to be delivered hereunder shall be in
writing and shall be deemed to be delivered when (i) hand-delivered to the official hereinafter
desi~.!1t~) three (3) clays after deposit in the United States mail. postage prepaid, cenified
mail, return receipt requested. addressed to the party at the address set fonh opposite the party's
name below, or such other address as the party shall have specified by written notice to the other
party and delivered in aa:ordance herewith: or (ill) the dale of actual receipt of a courier delivery:
City of Oviedo:
Oviedo City Hall
400 Alexandria Blvd.
Oviedo. FI.. 32765
Attention: City Manager
.
With a Copy to:
DoMl Mcintosh, Esquire
Stenstrom. McIntosh. Julian. ColtJert
Whigham &. Simmons. P .A.
200 W. Fint Street. Suite 22
Sanford. FI.. 32771
City of Winter Springs:
Winter Springs City Hall
1126 East SR 434
Winter Springs. FI..
Attention: City Manager
71' 9 reYlSIOI'I by KNppcnbacha' " AIIoQaIa
17
.
With a copy to:
Frank Kruppenbacher. Esquire
340 Nonh Orange Avenue
Orlando. FL 32801
.
The Viera Company: .., The Viera Company
7380 Murrell Road. Suite 201
Viera. F1.. 32940
Attention: Mason Blake. Esq.
With a copy to:
Hal H. Kantor. Esq.
Lowndes. Drosdick. Doster.
Kantor &. Reed, P.A.
215 Nonh Eola Drive
Orlando. F1.. 32801
To Rouse-Orlando, lnc:
Rouse-Orlando. Inc.
clo The Rouse Company
10275 Little Patuxent Pkwy.
Columbia, Maryland 21044-3456
Attention: General Counsel
With a copy to:
Hal H. Kantor. Esq.
Lowndes. Drosdick. Doster.
Kantor &. Reed. P.A.
215 Nonh Eola Drive
Orlando. F1.. 32801
15. ~~VF'.RA.Rn ITY_
.
(a) If any provision of this Agreement. the deletion of which would not adversely affect the
receipt of any maserial benefit by any party hereunder. or substantially increase the burden
of any party hereIo. shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable to any extent. the same
shall nol affect in any respect whatsoever the validity or enforceability of the remainder
of this Agreement.
(b) If this Agreement is challenged by any third pany in any judicial or administrative
proceeding (each pany hereby covenanting not to initiate or pursue such challenge). the
7/19 n!Vision by K.n.~ * ~
18
.
.
Parties collectively and individually agree to defend its validity through final
determination.
16. AMF.NOMF.NT This Agreement may not be modified or waived oraUy and shall
only be amended pursuant to an instrument in writing and jointly executed by all of the Parties
hereto. shall be enforceable by. binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Panies and their
respective successors and assigns. Any party to this Agreement shall have the right. but not the
obligation. to waive (in writing) rights or conditions herein reserved for the benefit of such pany.
17. APPllrARI F.I AW ANn VF.NlIF. This Agreement shall be governed by the
laws of the Stale of Florida. and venue for any action to enforce the provisions of this Agreement
shall be in the Circuit Court in and for Seminole County. Aorida.
18. rON~lIc-rION OF A(;RFF.MF.NT. All covenants. agreements.
representations and wUTanties made herein shall be deemed to have been material and relied on
.
by each pany to this Agreement. All Panies have participated in the preparation of this
Agreement. and the provisions hereof shall not be construed for or against any party by reason
of authorship.
19. rOllNTF.RPAR~ ANn TFI Frnpy This Agreement may be executed in a
number of identical counterpans. If so executed. each of such counterpans is to be deemed an
original for aU purposes and aU such counterpans shall. collectively. constitute one agreement.
but. in making p-oof of this Agreement. it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more
of such counterpans than are required to show that each party hereto executed at least one such
counterpan. A facsimile, telecopy or other reproduction of the Agreement may be executed and
delivered by the Parties (in counterpans or otherwise) and shall be considered valid. binding and
19
7/19 reY>1IOC\ by ~. t\Aol:Iala
.
effective for all purposes. At the request of any pany. the Panies hereto agree to execute an
original of this Agreement as well as any facsimile. telecopy or other reproduction.
20. MFnlATION In the event the Panies hereto are required by the tenns of this
.
Agreement to mutually agree upon any tenns, conditions. plans or any other items. and they are
not able to do so. then they shall enter into mediation in accordance with procedures prescribed
by the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council.
21. RF.("ORDING Within fifteen days of the execution of one original of this
Agreement by all Panies hereto, Viera shall, at its cost, record the original Agreement in the
Public Records of Seminole County. Florida. Notwithstanding the recording of this Agreement.
the same shall not constitute any lien or encumbrance on title to the Project and shall instead
constitute record notice of governmental regulations which may regulate the use and enjoyment
of the Project. Winter Springs and Oviedo shall, upon wrinen request by Viera or Rouse. provide
wrinen confumation of the status of this Agreement and performance or nonperfonnance of
obligations hereunder as may be reasonably requested by Viera or Rouse or any lender with .
respect to the Project or any ponion thereof. If this Agreement is tenninated. the pames shall
record a termination of this Agreement in the Public Records of Seminole County, Florida. and
such termination shall be conclusive evidence that this Agreement has. in fact. been terminated.
22. ("nIJN~F.I. In addition to acting as escrow agent. in any dispute hereunder
Escrow Agent may represent Winter Springs.
23. ('nMMIJNITV nRVF.l.nPMF.NT nl~lf"T Winter Springs and Oviedo
acknowledge that the Project (including Parcel 14) is located within the boundaries of the Dovera
Corrununity Development District (herein. the "CDD"). as provided under Chapter 190. Florida
20
7'19 revaian by ~ A AIIaClaIa
.-
.
Statutes. Winter Springs and Oviedo shall take such steps as may be necessary. if any. so as to
.
permit the COO to continue to exercise all rights. privileges. and powers that are currently
provided to it or to which it is otherwise entitled under applicable law.
24. RINntNG F.FFF.rT. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Parties. their
heirs. successors and assigns.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date
and year hereinafter set forth.
A TIEST:
4ttt;j~
ity Cleric
.
A n"EST:
~A~,t:'A.4t~
City Cle
CITY~SPRIN~
BY: ~
Title: ~_
DATE: I'j" - 011 -~
1'19 f1MSIOIl by ~_~A ~
21
.
.
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF SEMINOLE
PERSONAL Y me. the undersigned authority.
jud. Moo- A. fo . f. (J and well known to me to be the
~ C)I ( and City lerk. respectively. of the City of Oviedo. Florida, and
. ackno edged bef me that they are personally known to me and they executed the foregoing
instrument on behalf of the City of Winter Springs as its true act and deed. and that they were
authorized to do so.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this '\~ day 0
(SEAL)
.1995.
- .,." NaIc, ~tate .r FIorYI
., C_ I ...... &piNs..... 21. ,...
......., 'Ilwv T"" ,... . - -
.
7/19 rcY1Sl0fl by .............obac:Iwr A .'UIGCiaIa
22
.
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF SEMINOLE
.
PERSONALLY APPEARED before me. the undersigned authority,
..:fiJ....,v' ~ I!v; /I and .M.~ l.6~ .""" lit PI( IIIL..>- well known to me to be the
/~.., ,/DI'- and City Clerk. respectively. of the City of Winter Springs. Florida, and
acknowledged before me that they are personally known to me and they executed the foregoing
instrument on behalf of the City of Winter Springs as its true act and deed. and that they were
authorized to do so.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this L day of A()()v! r
,1995.
Notary Public / JC--u- 1-' /
Name: '- '-' c.. .., .
My Commission Expires:
'Lo6tfJ
II/I:J/Jr
ST ATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF c;,~ .....\L
.
PERSONALLY APPEARED before me, the undersif"ed authority,
~O-...A s 1>L ~ well known to me to be the V,., P(Ui.d~ of The Viera
. Company, and he ackno~ged before me that he is personally known to and he executed the
foregoing instrument on behalf of the corporation, and that he is authorized to do so.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this1~ day of ~us r . 1995.
(SEAL)
NOWY~ J'
Name: A:lf\.
My Commission Expires:
- ...",................ -
., C_ . '1- EqIInI 1In.21, '"I
...... nw T.., ..... --- -
.....o~f2..
7/19...--.by~~&~
23
.
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OFSu..t}ultl
PERSON ALL Y APPEARED before me. the undersigned authority.
~.f kI J d. ~l wu:f welllcnown to me to be the V; t...( '))rf .5.;~f of Rouse-Orlando.
~ed before me that he is personally known to me and he executed the
foregoing instrument on behalf of the corporation, and that he is authorized to do so.
WITNESS ~y hand and official seal this -11> day of tfv f . 1995.
.
(SEAU
No
Name: or-
My Commission Expires:
.....'" ,..... SIatt ., .....
., ,.... &plre Nn. 27, 1"1
...... "'"' T.., ,... . __ ...
.
7'19 nmsaan by KI\.,.,-~ & ~
24
.
.
Exhibits:
A - Legal description for Project propeny
B - Project plans with the Bridge Road
C - Declaration
.
208103\ETA YOlCM
.
26
OVIEDO CROSSDiG
LEGAL DESCRIPnO~
.
PAWl!' P ARca;
A PORTION OF' SEmoNS 16. 17. ANt) ::C. TOWNSHIP 11 SOt.."!H. itA,NGE 31 EAST. SmlG MORE
PARTIct."t.ARL Y DESCRmEO AS F'OLLOWS:
COMMENCE AT '!HE SOtmiEAST COR."lEll OF' SAm SEcnON 17. F'OR. A POINT OF'
R.EFEAENCE~ nmNCE RUN NORTH 19"'7"OCr WEST. ALONG THE SOtJ't'H ~ OF'
SAlt) SEcnON 17. A DISTANCE OF' 1013~1 FE! TO '!HE POINT OF' BEGrNNING~
~ CONTINUE NORm 19"~ WEST. ALONG SAm SOUTH tmE. A DIST A,.'lCE
OF 149.02. FET TO THE NORniWEST CORNER: Of' LOT 11. S1.A VIA COLONY
COMPANY'S StJBOrvISION. AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1. PAOE 71. PUBUC
RECORDS Of' SEMINOLE COt..mY. Ft.ORmA:. nmNCE. OEPARTING SAID SOUTH
UNE. RUN SOtJ't'H 00'50'55" EAST. ALONG T"nE WEST ~'E OF' SAm t.OT 11. A
DISTANCE Of' '71,j6 FET~ T"riENCE. DEPARTING SAm WEST ~ Rt.)'N SOUTH
37-09'05- WEST. A DISTANCE Of' 311.&5 FET~ THENCE ilt.."N SOUTH 31'1'ro5" WEST.
A DISTANCE OF 71L1S FE! TO THE SOUTH LDm OF LOT 33 OF SAm SU VIA.
COLONY COMPANY"S stJBCrvtSION~ nmNCE RUN NORTH 19"1'55" WEST. ALONG
SAID SOUTH LINE OF LOT 33. A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FET TO THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF SAm LOT 33~ THENCE. DEPARTING SAm SOUTH LINE. R.UN NORTH
00-51'11- WEST. ALONG THE WEST LINE Of' LOTS 33 AJI/t) 34 Of' SAm SLAVIA.
COLONY COMPAN'Y"S StJBOrvISION. A DtsTANCE Of' 11L71 FE!~ nlENCE.
DEPARTING SAID WEST LINE. RUN NOR.TH '1'51'1" EAST. A DISTANCE OF 605.71
nET TO A POJNT ON mE NOR.TH UNE OF SAID LOT 34. SAID POEm ALSO BEING ON
THE SOtTTHUNE OF SAJD SECTION 17~!HENCE lWN NORm 19'4~ WEST. ALONG
SAID sotmlUNE OF SEC:'TICN 1'. A DISTANCE OF 10'71.U FEr TO THE NOR.THWEST
CORNER OF LOT 35 OF SAID SLA VIA COLONY COMPANYS StJ'BCrvISION. SAJD
COlUml ALSO BEING THE SOU"tHEAST CORNEll Of' '!HE SOUTHWEST QUARTER. Of'
SAID SECTION 17~ mENCE R.tJN SOUTH "-51'4:- WEST. ALONG SAJD SOUTH tJNE.
A DISTANCE OF U96.$4 FEEr TO mE EAStE1U.Y lUOHT -af'-WA Y LINE OF PROPOSED
RED SUG ROAD. HA V1NO A PRCPOSEC IUGHr -aF-W A. Y WlOTH OF 1.0.00 F'EET. SAJD
POIN! ALSO BEING ON A NON-TANGENT Ctr1lVE. CONCAVE SOU'THEASTERLY.
BOM WHICH A RADIAL UN! BEAlS SOUTH 37'31"3" EAST~ THENCE RUN
soUTHWESTEJU,. Y ALQNO SAID PR.OPOSED RED SUG R.OAD AND SAm ctmVE.
HAVING A R.ADlUS L2NOtH or 1203.24 PEr. A CENnW. ANOU or 13'3n'7". AN
AAC l.ENcmI or -.n nEro A CHORD LENcmI OF 215.&5 FUT. AND A. CHORD
8EAlUNOOF soutH45-mrWEST~ lHENCE.CEPAallNG SAU) PKOPOSED RED SUG
ICA.D RJDHr.or-WAY.IWNNOKtH 51-16"16- WIST. A DISTANCE OF 140.00 FEET TO
11E NOR1HEAS1IILYUNI or A 110 FOOT FLORIDA POWEll AND UGHr COMPANY
LUE)Iftrt. AS IICOIDED IN omcw. RECOIU)S BOO~ 143. ,AGE 2.53. OF SAm
PUBLIC R!CO~ nmNCI IWN NOIlTH 31-11"1'- WEST. ALONG SAJD
NORTHE.ASTDI. Y tJNI. A DISTANCE OF 50$.11 FEET~ nlENCE DEPARTING SAm
NORmEASt!1U. YUNI.lWNNOIlmOl-11'~ EAST. A DISTANCE OF 5$0.79 FEET TO
A POINT ON A NON-TANOENt' CtnlVE. CONCAVE NOR.THEASTERL Y. FIlOM WHICH
A IADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH 01.'3'CD- EAST~ nmNCE R.UN NOl.tHWESTERL Y
ALCNO SIJD CUR.VE.HA V1NO ARADIl1S t.e<<ml OF15O.CO fEr. A a:NTI.AL ANotE
or 131-"')1-. AN ~ tS<<ml or 1113,M nET. A CHORD LENGTH or 1.t03.06 FEET.
AND A CHOIU) BEAJUNO OFNOI.TH 11-59'.0- W!ST~ nENCE lWN NORTH SO-1m-
EAST. A DISTANCE OF 423.:tO FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERN MOST LINE OF
.
.
2 of ~
.
rosCAWUl.A t.."N1T 7. AS RECOR::lE:! IN pur aOOK:':' PAGES "6 ANt) 47. OF' SA.lD
PtJBt.;C a!CORDS~ r~a llt."N SOt..Tn 69.03'~3. EAST. ALONG SAID SOtrrna.N
MOST !-"'EA OISTANCE OF 664.77 F'S:ET TO 1'"riE SOt..7:-~T CORNER OF tOT 31. OF
SAID 'I"':SCAWlU.A t..'NIT'7~ neiCa. OEPAAT!NG SAID SOt..T:-E,N MOST ~'E. Rt..'N
NORTH 00"41'26" WEST. ALONG rriE EAST ~ OF SAJD r....SCAWIU..A t..'NrI' 7. A
DISTANCE OF 17915.40 FETTO THE SOtJ'THWEST COR.'lER. OF rt:SCAWII.L.A UNIT 13.
AS RECORDED IN PUT BOOK 19. PACES 1 ANt) %. OF SAm PUBUC R.ECORDS~
THENCE. DEPA.R.TING SALJ EAST t-~ Rt1N NORTH 19"51'03" EAST. ALONG THE
SOtmi~ OF SAm roSCAWILU tJNII' 13.A OISTANCE OF :t741.19 FETTO THE
NORmwEST CORNER. OF LOT 11 OF THE Af'0RESAIJ:) SLA. VIA COLONY COMP AN"'n
SUBOIVlSICN~ mENC:E. OEPAAnNG SAID SOtn'H LINE. R.UN SOU'IH 17"167.5" EAST.
ALONG THE NOR1H LINE OF LOTS 11 ANt) 11 OF SAID SL.A VIA COLONY COMP AN'Y"S
SUBOIVmCN. A OIST ANCE OF lZS5.36 FET TO nE NORTHEAST CORma OF SA.EC
LOT 1~ !HENCE. OEPARnNG SAlO NORTH ~ 1WN SOtmi 00"21"2.6" EAST. ALONG
THE EAST t.H OF LOTS 11. 10.1 AM) 6. OF SAm SUVIA COLONY COMPANY'S
stJBOM.SION. A OISTA..'lCE OF %61:.11 FEET. TO THE NORTHWttr CORma OF lOT
2. OF SAJI) SUo VIA COLONY COMP A..W$ St:aOrvtSION~ THENCE. OEP AR1'ING SAm
EAST t-~ R.UN SOUTH 19"45'~1" EAST. ALONG nE NOIlTH I.o.."'lE OF LOTS 1 AND 1.
OFSAlD SU,VIA COLONY COMPA..W$ St.'BOMsrON. A DISTA..'lCE OF 1167.10 F'E!
TO A POINT ON THE WEST ~ OF A CSX R.AJ1JlOAO RIGHT.OF.WAY. HAVING A
1'.00 FOOT RIGHT-oF.WAY wmrll THENCE. OEPAR1'ING SAJI) NORTH LINE.1lt1N
SOUTH 13"41'40- WEST. ALONG SAID WEST UN!. A DISTANCE OF S01.11 FEn~
niENCE DEP ARnNO SAm WEST tmE.1WN NORTH 19"45'41" WEST. A OtsT ANCE OF
317.75 FEET TO A 'OINT ON THE EAST [mE OF SAm LOT 1 OF $LA VIA COLONY
COMPANY'S stJBOMSION~ ne<<:E RUN NORTH 00".uU" WEST. ALONG SAm EAST
UN!. A OISTANCE OF 1".37 FEET TO mE SOutH LmE OF THE NORlH 261.66 FEET
OF SIJD LOT ~ nmNCE. OEPARTING SAm EAST LINE. RUN NORlH 1"~5"41" WEST.
ALONG SAJD NOR1H UN!. A DISTANCE OF 111.16 FEET~ THENCE. OEPAR1'ING SAID
NOR.nlI~ lWN SOUTH 73""'01" WEST" A OISTANCE OF 40'.11 FEET TO A POINT
ON THE WEST LINE OF SAm lOT ~ nmNCE CON'mroE SOUTH 13"CI"Ot" WEST. A
OISTANCE OF 15.M FEET. miNCE IlUN SOutH OO"U'lo- EAST. A OISTANCE OF
%26.37 FEET~ nmNCE 1WN NORTH "-45"41" WEST. A OISTANCE OF 131." FEn TO
. A .000 ON THE NORniERL Y UN! OFUOHIWOoo ICNOT CA.'lAL. HA vtNG A WIDTH
OF 50.00 FEET~ rdENCE R1JN SOt1TH '1"9'11- EAST. ALONG SAm NORTHERL Y LINE.
A OISTANCE OF 61.11 FEr TO A POINT ON nm NORTH t.H OF LOT 19 OF SAm
$LA VIA COLONY COWPANY"S StJlDIVISION~ THENCE. DEPAR.TING SAID
NORTHERLY LH OF UQHI'WOOD DlOT CANAL. R.UN NORm 19"~"2Q8 WEST.
ALONG THE NOR1HUNEOFLOTS l' AND II OF SAID SL.\VIA. COLONY COMPANY"S
SUBDIVISION. A OJ:sTANCE OF P7U5 fET. nENCE. DEJlAR.nNG SAID NORm UNE.
RUN SOutH oo.,nr lAST" A OISTANCE OF 66La FEET TO tHE POINT OF
~
AND TOGE1HE1l wmr:
A 'ORnON OF SECTION 20. TOWNSHIP %1 SOUTH. RANGE 31 EA.ST. BEING MORE pAR.nctJLA1U. y
OESCUBED AS FOU.OWS:
COMMENCE AT nm NORlHWEST CORNEl. OF SAID SEenON 20. FOR A. POINT OF
~ 1HENCElWNNCRm.,"SI'C" WT.ALONOTHENOR1HLnE OF SAID
~noN 2O.A.DESTANCE or W2.~1 FEET TO tHE NORtHWEST CORNER OF LOT o.
or THI AFOpltuJD SLAvtA. COLONY COWPANY"S SUBDMSrCN. THENCE.
DEJtAR.'I1NO SAJI) NORlH LINE OF SEcncN 2O.1WN SOutH oo--=- EA.ST. ALONG
THE WEST LINE OF LOTS ~3 AHD "- or SAID SL.\VIA. COLONY COMPANY"S
StJBOMSION. A OISTANCE OF 13'.41 FEET TO tHE POINT OF BEGINNINCi-. THENCE
.
.
CONTINtJE ALONG SAID WEST ~~ SOt.Td OO.~'1O. EAST. A DISTA.\lCE OF 493.62
FE! 7'0 THE SOt.rrHWEST CCR.~ OF SAm LoOT 44; nmNCE. OEPARTINCi SAID
WEST t..."'lE. R.UN SOtrn{ 89.51'5... EAST. ALONG T"nE SOlmi IlNE OF SAlD toT '"
A DISTANCE OF 667.25 FU1' 70 THE SORn-:EAST CORN'ER. OF LoOT 45 OF SAII:i
SLA VIA COLONY COMPANn St."BDIVTSION; TIiENC!. DEPARTING SAm SOtnH
LINE. Rt.."N soum 00"51'01" EAST. AlONCi T"nE EAST ~ OF LOTS 45 ANt) 46 OF'
SAJD $LA VIA COMPAN'Y"S stJBOIVtSION. A DInANC! OF 1179.S) FEET TO A POINT
ON THE EXISnNG NORnlDLY lUOHr.oF.WAY ~ OF REO BUG llOAD. WHICH
HAS A V ARYlNCi RICiHT'.oF.WAY W!Dm ~CE. DEPARTtNG SAm EAST UNE. RUN
ALONG SAID NORnmtL Y lUCiHT.oF.WAY ~ NORm 19"56'21", A DISTANCE OF
334.13 FEET~ niENC! CEP ARTING SAm NORniElU. Y RIOHT.oF.W A Y LINE R.UN
NOllmoo"49'40-W'EST.ADISTANC! OF 439.30 FEET; ntENCE RUN SOtJ'TH 41.19'Ose
WEST, A DISTANCE OF 411.49 FEET 7'0 A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF LOT 46 OF'
SAm SU VIA COLONY COMP ANn stl'BDIVtSION; THENCE RUN SOtJ'TH 00""'7
EAST. ALONG SAID WEST ~ A DISTA.\lC! OF 77.13 FEr TO THE AFOWAlD
EXtS'tING NORTHERLY IUCiHT.oF.WAY LINE OF RED BUG ROAD~ mENCE RUN
ALONG SAm NORnmtL Y RIOHr.oF.WA Y ~ mE FOLLOwtNG COtJR.SES AND
DISTANCES: niENC! RUN NORm 89"56'2.1" war. A DISTANCE OF 661.15 FEn;
THENe! RUN SOtJ'TH 00"45'39" EAST. A DISTA.\lCE OF 35.00 FEET; mENCE RUN
NORm U"56"2r W'EST.A DESTA.\lC! OF 66UI FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST tmE
OF LOT 65 OF SAID SLA. VIA COLONY COMPANY"S StJBOMSION. SAID POINT AUO
BEINCi ON THE EA.STUN! OF A PAR.CEL OFtAND. RECORDED IN omcw. RECORDS
BOOK 691. PAGE 637, OF THE AFOR.ESAJI) PUBLIC RECORDS~ THENCE. DEPARTING
SAID NORTHERLY lUCiHT .oF.W A Y ImE. RUN NORm 00"4%'51" WEST. ALONG M
WEST LINE OF LOTS 65. 64 Am) 61. A. DISTANCE OF 1116.12 FEET~ nlENCE.
DEPARTING SAID WEST UN!. AND SAlO EAST t.nE OF SAID PARCEL OF lAM)
RECORDED IN OfiICAL RECORDS BOOK 91. PACE 631. RUN NORTH 0-17'0%" EAST.
A DISTANCE OF 1$5.00 FEET~ THENCE lWN SOtnH 56-1rsa EAST. A. DISTANCE OF
190.00 FEET~ THENCE RUN SOUTH 13"'9'55" EAST. A. DISTANCE OF 19.6'7 F'EET~
THENCE R.UN NORlH 41"3rar EAST. A. DISTANCE OF 115.00 FEET~ n!ENCE RUN
NOR.TH 19"1'7'03" EAST. A DISTANCE OF 120.00 FEET; male! RUN SOt.mn2" 41'sa"
WT.AOISTANCE OFIS.f3 fEr~ nmNCElWN NORm 19"11'02" EAST. A DISTANCE
OF 531.'9 FUr TO THE POINT OF BECin'OONG.
THE ABOVE DESClUBED PAAENr PA.RCEL OF tAND CONTAINS 496.160 ACRES. MORE OR WS.
ws:
1HA1' PORtION OF THE rou.oWlNO DE!MI"'~ 1U0Hr .oF.W A. Y FOR STATE ROAD 411 THAT LIES
WItHIN THE ABOVE DES"'Wftm'l PA.ItINr PAllCEL.
COWMENCNG AT nil soutHEAST COINER. OF SAm SECtION 17~ lHENCE 5 '9".TSQ- W
ALONG THI SOU'THEIJ.T UN! OF SAID SE 114. A DISTANCE OF S71.OJ FEr TO A POINT
BEING tHI POINT or 1EGDOGN00 nmNCE CONTlNtJING S '9".'7'Sr W ALONG THB
SOUTHElU. Y LZNI or SAm sa 114. A. DISTANCI or 1090.19 FEEt TO A. POINT~ tHENCE
tV. WIG 1HI sounEII.Y UNI or SAID 51 114. N OS-S1'3r I. A DISTANCE OF 114.11 FElT
TO A POINT~ nIENCE N 7.-.7V'I W: A. DISTANCE OF 113m FEEt TO A. POINT~ THENCE N
17'44" W. ADISTANC! OF390.S9 FEr TO A PO!Nt~ nIENCE N 10"01'06 W. A DISTANCE or
111.n FEEt TO A POINT~ THENCE N OCM6'SO W, A DISTANCE or 110.00 FEr TO A. POJNr;
THENCE N U-orot I. A DISTANCE or 50030 FEET TO A POINT~ lHENC! N 7,W40 I. A
DISTANCE OF 1"'" PET TO A. POINf~ THEHa N U -s.r54- E. A. DISTANCE 0l153~1 FEET
TO A POINT; THENa N 1S~. I. A. DISTANCI or 191.25 FEEt'TO A. POINT~ tHENCE N
or3nr E. It. DISTANCE OF 17S.s7 FEET TO A. POINf~ mENCE ALONG A. ctJItVE CONCA VI
sotT.I'HEASTERL Y AN AR.C DISTANCE OF 560.'9 FEET (SAID ctJ'R.VE HAVING A 1W)lt1S OF
3af!
.
.
.
4 of 5
.
6'0.00 FE'!'. A CE:NTR.AL ANCi~ OF 50.~2'~9". A..'lO A CHORD BEARINCi AND DISTANCE OF
N 34"'5'04" E. $43.11 FE'!) TO A POM~ THENCE N 59.51':.1" E. A DISTANCE OF 34&.93 r"l.
TO A POINT~ THE:NCE ALONCi A CO..AVE CONCAVE NOR.T"n"'W'ESraL Y A..'l ARC DIST A.'lCE OF
620.19 FE! (SAm ctJR.VE RA'v'ING A RADIUS OF !SO.OO 1":.=.1. A CEN't'R.AL ANCiLE OF
41 "5O'43".ANC A CHORD BEARING A..'lO DISTANCE OFN31"56lJr E. 601.01 FEn TO A POINT"
THENCE N 11"00'45. E. A DISTA...'lCE OF 115.10 ~ TO A POINT~ mENCE S 65'07"30" E. i..
DISTANCE OF60.11FEETTOAPOINt~ nmNCE N 14"'1"30"E. A DISTANCE OF 130.00 F'EnTO
A POINT~ mESa N ]0.11'15. W. A DISTANCE OF 120.06 FEET TO A POINT~!liENCE N
2O.51'4r E. A DISTANCE OF 11134 FEr TO A POINT ON THE EA.S1"ElU. Y um OF SAID !'olE V4~
tHENCE S 00.41"5,. E. A DtsTA...'lCE OF 56&.17 FEET TO A POINT BEING THE HE COR.'lER. OF
nm SE 114 OF SAID SEcnON 17; nmNCE ALONG THE EA.S'tERL Y LINE OF SAm SE 1/4. S
OO.SVW E. A DISTANCE OF .c&U6 FEn TO A POINT; niENCE UA VINCi T"riE SAm EASn:RL Y
UN! OF SIJD SE V4, N 70.16'1'- W. A DISTANCE OF 150.23 F'EET TO A POINT~ nmNCE S
19.43'45'" W, A DISTANCE OF l3O.CO F'EET TO A. POINT; THENCE S 13.11"''- E. A DISTANCE OF
36.16 FEET TO.A. POINT; mENCE S 07.,!'2D. W. A DISTANCE OF lOUl FEET TO A POINt'~
nmNCE S 11"%3"'. W, A DISTA...'lCE OF 901.33 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S 10.34'09"' W. A.
DISTANCE OF 3CUI FEr TO A. POINT; !HENCE S 01001'49" W. A. DISTANCE OF 100.7'7 FC:ET
TO A POINT; !HENCE ALONG A Ct. 'R VE CONCAVE NOR.THEA.STDl. Y AN ARC DIS! ANCE OF
377.rt7 FEET (SAID ct.1R.VE HAVClG A RADIUS OF %Q.OO FEET, A CEN't1AL ANGLE OF
C-:1"3:., AND A CHORD BEAlUNG AND DISTANCE OF S 39~'5r E. 34.5.36 FE!) TO A POINt;
THENCE S &0-1....'. E. A DISTANCE OF 119.16 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S 11.11'16. E. A.
DISTANCE OF 101.~ FEr TO A. POINT; mENCE S ".59"29'" E. A DISTANCE OF 332.16 FEET TO
A POINT; nmNCE S or 1""" W. A. DISTANCE OF 2:C.CO FEET TO A POINT; nmNCE N 16.50'19"
W. A DISTANCE OF 3%6.93 FEr TO A POINT; THENCE N U.'3'$1. W. A. DISTANCE OF 191.3i
FEET TO A. POINT; THENCE S u.4O".... W, A. DISTANCE OF 13.dO FEr TO A. POINT; niENCE
S ao-S7'24. E. A DISTANCE OF 7333 fEET TO A. POINT; THENCE S O-"1"SOO W, A DISTANCE OF
111,11 FEET TO A POINt'; tHENCE S .o"04'5r W, A DISTANCE OF 19.66 fEET TO A POINT
BEING mE POINT OF BEOINNINCi.
mAT POR.noN OFnm ABOVE DESCRIBED RIOHr.oF"WA. Y FOR.STATE ROAO 417 mAT L.IES wmmr
THE AFOR.ESAJD PARENT' P A1lCEL CONTAINS 39.159 ACRES. MORE OR. ws.
ANt) ALSO LESS:
mAT PoanON OF mE FOtJ.OWlNG DESCRIBED RIOHr~F.WA.Y Foa STA.TE llOAD 417 mAT UES
WITHIN nm ABOVE DESauBED PARENT PAaCa.
A PAIlCEL OFUND LOC:A1ED IN'tHENI V4 OF SECTION 20. TOWNSHIP 11 SOutH. RANCiE 31 EAST"
SEldINOLE COUNTY. fT..OIUE>>.BEJNQALSO lHATPAR.T OF LOTS 33 AND ,. ACCORDING TO SU ~
COLONY CO'S. SUBDMSrCN RECOIDED IN PLAT BOOK 2. PAOE 11. or THE Pt1BUC RECORDS OF
$BaNOLE COUNTY. n..olUDA. LYJNO wtnmf THE FOlLOWING BOUNDAJUES DEJI"tIUt1ro AS
FOLLOWS:
c:a.&eK:INO A.TlHE EAST 114 COINEI. OF SAD:) SECTlCN n tHENCE s "~4Ii' VI ALONG
nm SOUDElU.YUNI 0'1 SAID NE ~A DISTANCE OF:a.D FEET TO A POINT BEING THE
POINt' OF BEOINNJ:NCt. THENCE CONmMNG S o-46'W VI ~NO tHE SOU'tHEIU. Y UNI
or SAJD HE ~ADDTANCE or 149.71 FEErTO A.POJNf~ tHEHCI LEA V1NO THE SOUTHE1U. Y
tJNE OF SAID NE V... N 2S-n'3O'" I!. A DISTANCE or ".64 FElT TO A POINt' ON THE
NOlmIERLY 1UDHr4.WAY UN! Of am 8tJO UIZ lOAD (1ODfOOf JUDHr4.WA.Y ~
nIENCE ALCNO SAID NCRmERL Y RJDH1'~.WAYUNE S ..." VI.ADlSTANCE OF 1%UO
FET TO A POIN!' ON nm WTE1U. Y 1I000.or.VlAY UNI or TATltA. STIEET 00 rOOT
RIGHT.oF.WAn tHENCE LEAVING SAID NOR.tHERLY RICHr.or.WAYUNI ALONG SAlt!
EASTEIU. Y 1I0Hr .oF.WA. Y u:NE N 01"017 W, A DISTANCE or 1:.10 FEr TO A. POINt'.
mENCE LEA VINCi SAlD EASTDL Y RIOHr.oF.WA. Y LINE N 26.347 E. A. DISTANCE OF 957.11
...
.
.
5 of 5
FEET' 70 A POINt'~ niENCE N 17-05"36- E. A DIST ANa OF soo.n :ET TO A POINT~ !HENCE
N 11-4TSS- E. A DISTANCE OF 4OO.711':.::.~ 70 A POOO~ !"'nENCE N 16-S0"3'- E. A OISTANCE .
OFm:ArmTOAPOINI'~ n-EiCENO'-40'3r E.ADIS'I'ANCE OF 417.61 FEET'TO APOM'
THENCE N 01-U'24-W."ACISTANCE OF 156..51 FETTO A POINI'~ niENCE NOS-Sl'3rE.A
CIS'I'ANCE OF 160." FEET TO A POINI' ON mE NORnmRL Y r...~ OF SAm NE V4~ THENCE
N U-47'SCY E ALONG nm NORnm:1U.Y ~ OF SAJI) NE V4. A CISTANCE OF 1090.'9 FEn TO
A POINT~ THENCE LU.vtNG mE NORTHERLY ~ OF SAm NE V4. S 40-04"" W. A
OrsT ANCE OF 71&.SS F'EET TO A POINt~ THENCE S 56-20'20- w. A CIS'tANCE OF 116.64 FEn
TO A POINT~ THENCE S 34-ms- W. A CISTANCE OF 506.36 FEET TO A POINr~ 'IHENCi S
1S~'30- W. A CrsTANCE OF 1300.00 FEE'I' TO A. POINT~ THENCE S 11 ~- W. A CISTANa:
OF 3n.6S FEET TO A POINT ON nm NORnm:RL Y RIOHr ~F.WA Y LINE OF SAm RED BUG
LAJCE RO~ THENCE S '9-C6'~- W ALONG SAID NOR.nm:RI.Y RIQH'I'~F.WAY UNE.. A
CJSTANCEOF 166.11 FEETTOAPOINI'~ niENCELEAVlNG SAID NOR.nm:RLY RIGHr~F.WAY
UNE S 1S~ W. ACISTANCE OF 55.'" FEE'I'TO A POINT BEING nm POINt OF' BEGINNINcr.
'tHAT POR.TION OFniE ABOVE OESOIBm RICH! .(JF.WA Y FOR. STATE R.OAD 417 THAT UES ~
mE AFORESAID PARENT PAllca. CONTAINS 7.413 ACRES. MORE OR t.ESS.
AND ALSO t.ESs:
THAT POR.nON OF RED BUG LA1CE ROAD RICiHr~F.WAY. ACCORDING TO RIOHr.oF'.WAY AND
RESEllVAnON MAP BOOK 2.. PAGES 56 nmOUGH go OF nm PUBUC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE
COUNTY. Ft.ORJDA.. mAT LIES WItHIN nm PARENT P Allal. OF LAND.
1H)SE POR.TIONS OFnm ABOVE SAD:) RED BUG LAIC! R.OAD RIGHI' ~F .WA Y mAT 1J! wtTHIN THE
AFORESAID PARENT PARCEL CONTAIN 15.126 ACRES. MORE OR. LESS.
THE ABOVE CESClUBEC PARCEL OF LAND tJES IN SEMINOLE CoUNTY. FLORIDA ANC CONTAJNS
435.161 ACRES. MORE OR. t.ESS.
s...:.: "",,#UmtIl EIIpw.rurr C~ 11&
.
.
.
.
.
'_II' I
otftoe
'_1.
om..
...... ....
~
_.._u_ ~ ~
_ ....... c:-_ _
. ........ Deft.,...l
. . . . . . ..... .all lUId hYel-e "8ericei.
-r-- Ftoper~y
~ ..... S,.... __~ ,._1
Oviedo Crossing
81
OVIEDOI
CROSSINGJ
Exhibit B
1'M "- Cea,..,
~
GlaU&lll J.... ~ ..... a.,.. lIuI'IoI'\,'" . .,.......... c:-tIuw. 1M.
-,.,... -.r/T,..natilll ,...., PIt. fn;Nw
~ DtMa<;. ,..~_ ..._ .. ..... PI. I..a L. ..... e-lUaI ........
LI9GI c.,.,. ~.. w.tiIl
..... ..., &.-
--- ... ......
-- ....
. -.. _ .-
..... .. ,..
This insaument was prepared by
and should be returned to:
Aaron J. GorovilZ, Esquire
Lowndes. Drosdick. Doster. Kantor
&. Reed, Professional Association
21S North Eola Drive
Orlando, Rorida 32801
(407) 8434600
.
DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTION~
TIllS DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS is made this
day of - ,199_, by THE VIERA COMPANY, a Florida corporation (hereinafter,
"Viera") and ROUSE-ORLANDO, INC., a Maryland corporation (hereinafter, "Rouse").
W IT N E SSE T H:
WHEREAS, the City of Oviedo, a municipal corporation organized and existing under
the laws of the State of Florida (hereinafter. "onedo") entered into an Agreement with Viera
and Rouse dated November 21, 1994. which agreement contemplated that a regional shopping
center would be developed on land which at the time of the Agreement was located in
unincorporated Seminole County (hereinafter. the "MaD") and that such land. together with
contiguous land thereto. would be annexed into Oviedo, all as more panicularly described
therein; and
WHEREAS, the Mall was and is a portion of a larger project which is a Development .
of Regional Impact (hereinafter. "DRI"); and
WHEREAS, the City of Winter Springs. a municipal corporation organized and existing
under the laws of the State of Florida (hereinafter. "Winter Springs") is the grantee of a ten
(10) foot conservation easement pursuant to that certain Easement between Winter Springs
Development Joinl Venmre and Winter Springs recorded September 17. 1993. in Official
Records Book 2648. Page 0039. Public Records of Seminole County. Florida (hereinafter. the
"Conservation Easement"; the lands subject to the Conservation Easement are described more
particularly in Exhibit " A" a~hM hereto and. incorporated herein and are hereinafter referred
to as the "Conservation Euement Area"); and
WHEREAS. Winter Springs and Oviedo and Viera and Rouse (hereinafter, collectively,
the "Parties") entered into that certain Settlement Agreement dated March 24. 1995. which
agreement the Parties later amended and replaced by entering into that certain Amended
Settlement Agreement dated , 1995 (hereinafter. the "Settlement Agreement");
and
20895S\SC!MECMD
.
.
WHEREAS, the Settlement Agreement contemplated the construction by Viera and
Rouse of a Bridge Road, more panicularly described therein, connecting the DR! project via a
bridge over the Central Florida Greeneway to State Road 426 (hereinafter, the "Bridge Road")
in lieu of a previous plan which did not include the Bridge Road but rather contemplated
construction by Viera and Rouse of a road to the Nonh of the DR! project providing direct
access to Winter Springs Boulevard over and across the Conservation Easement Area; and
WHEREAS, the Settlement Agreement requires Viera and Rouse to execute and record
in the Public Records of Seminole County, Florida, this Declaration of Covenants and
Restrictions encumbering the portion of the DR! project owned by them on this date; and
WHEREAS, Viera and Rouse have executed this Declaration of Covenants and
Restrictions pursuant to the Settlement Agreement and to fulfill pan of their obligations
thereunder;
NOW THEREFORE, VIERA and ROUSE declare as follows:
.
1. RECITALS. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein
and made a pan of this Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions. As of the date hereof, Viet:a
and Rouse own the portion of the DR! project depicted on Exhibit "B" (the "Viera and Rouse
Property") .
2. RESTRICTIONS ON USE OF CONSERV A nON EASEMENT AREA.
Viera, Rouse, their successors and assigns, and any successors-in-title to the Viera and Rouse
Property covenant and agree not to construct roads or other improvements within the portion of
the Conservation Easement Area located west of the Central Florida Grecneway and depicted
on Exhibit "C" attached hereto, without the prior written consent of Winter Springs.
3. BINDING EFFECT. The terms, agreements, covenants and restrictions set
fonh herein shall run with title to the Viera and Rouse Property.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Viera and Rouse have executed this Declaration of
Covenants and Restrictions on the date and year set fonh hereinabove.
In Witness Whereof:
THE VIERA COMPANY, a Florida
corporation
Printed:
By'
Nam....
Itc.
Printed:
7380 Murrell Road, Suite 201
Viera, Florida 32940
208958\SCIMECMD
2
.
ROUSE-ORLANDO, INC., a Maryland
corporation
Printed:
By'
Nam'"
.
Ite-
Printed
10275 Little Patuxem Pkwy.
Columbia, Maryllnd 21044-3456
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF
PERSONALLY APPEARED before me, the undersigned authority,
well known to me to be the of The Viera
Company, and he acknowledged before me that he executed the foregoing instrument on behalf
of the corporation, and that he is authorized to do so.
WITNESS my band and official seal this _ day of
.1995.
(SEAL)
Notary Public
Nam".
My Commission Expires:
.
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF
PERSONALLY APPEARED before me, the undersigned authority,
well known to me to be the of Rouse-Orlando,
Inc., and he acknowledged before me that he executed the foregoing insuumem on behalf of the
corporation, and that be is authorized to do so.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this _ day of
,1995.
Notary Public
Nam".
My Commission Expires:
(SEAL)
2089'8\SC[MECMD
3
.
JOINDER BY ESCROW AGENT
.
Kroppenbacher & Associates, Inc., joins in this Amended Settlement Agreement for the
purpose of acknowledging receipt of the Parcel 14 Petition and for the purpose of agreeing to
act as Escrow Agem in accordance with all the terms hereof.
& ASSOCIATES, INC.
cher, Esquire
.
220906\POWEL.I..RR
.
.
.
Appendix C
Service Agreement Letters
.
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 2001
Tl
::-r
n_.=..
r-._
:""'
fl
c--;
il
q
~ 1
fl.
r
[J
\I
r ~I
o
,.., .....
~.J~
u
j'.:l
u
=::1
u
11
~
,-J
'":1
.J
.:...:.:.a
J
~.
J
ENYJRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT .
October-l9,1999
. .
VIa Fax: (407) 849-9401
Original U.S. Mail
. .Mr.'RicbaId D. Merltel. P.E.
. Profes9nmil F1\ginP-f!rine Consoltmts, Inc.
200 East RobiDson Street, Suite 1560
Orlando,FL 32801
RE: Oviedo M~lace DRI
. Dear Mr. M.e1:kel:
Please be advised that per year le11cr dated October 6, this letter is llOquU:ed from Seminole Comtty
EllYu....n~Pnrnl Servia:s stating their ability to conrinne serve water and sewer service for the above
referenced project. ~ole ComIty Uyu.L..1h,=da) Services does bYe available water aDd sewer;
CIp3City within this service area. If the ~~ capacity. goes . over-tile. nriFl-agreemem: fcnvater . .
aDd sewer c:apaci1y, an amE"!'lmnent to those. agreerol('JttS would be needed. If you bave any questions or
require any additional iDfotmation, do DOt b~ 10 contact me at (407) 665-2026.
~~-
One-Stop p.." ...;lI;..g
aIC8'''..
OCT 2 0 \99;
pa" P! ....
. WORK COf'lf I" in
OAlGINATOR I eom
ONE COPY 15 ~UTE T'~'
..
\-\..0
Ft\.E -OS - 0 f ~
~ "'\.. ~. 4. 4-1
j 500 WEST LAKE MARY BOULEVARD SANFORDFL 32773-7499 TELEPHONE (407) 605-2000 FAX (407) 605-2019
~
.~ ~.
~R ·
'~._ ec r ng
~ - Servl " S
i /NC. '!d
-==-
. 1
J
-
;1
j
a
u
j.
~
lie
U
I
D
I
I
\.
3
I
t
October 18, 1999
. .
FLORIDA RECYCLING SERVICES INC.
. :';M~7fffut\ii( . _5:.:.,t~~).
. i '~f!'~~~\ ~d~ r~.I'li
'. \ -. . ..:.-....., .0fD ~lO .......;}it
'Jl. ;.....~ . ''',' . . '-"":';.:r.',~:;;-;.J
.~~.if6cl~.9J ~ .' .' "::~:'~T;~~['f~~'fi
;'~;":{~~~,;'~~r~
':~'. ::.,'. -~~ :....;.~.':..I
.' . ~ . c
,- "j
i
I .
PEe
. 200 East Robinson Street' Suite 1560
Odando, FL 3~01
Re:
Oviedo MaIketplace
Dear:Mr. Merkel:
..
This letter is to confirm that Florida Recycling Services provides solid waste collection
services for portions of the above referenced Oviedo :Marketplace project To be more
specific we can provide services for the entire area except for the Oviedo Marketplace
Mall itself. If you need any additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at
-~T~S.~_1~!5.~~ ~ ~.~?~~____.. . _.. _ _ _'" . ,___.... _ '"_ ...__' .__ ._._. _.:___.~
Sincerely,
ffi\~" \t\ \tN.Q
IIEealYIID
OCT 2 0 1999:
Pii.&- .. .. ..-.
Maureen Kelleher
Pirect Sales Executive
Florida Recycling Services
~..
1'5-O( _
l'-S.4-.c4-i
@ FrinIed (II Recycled Paper
925 SOUTH CLYDE MORRIS BLVD.. DAYTONA BEAC}-I.. FLORIDA 321 14 · (904) 248-0n1
.
June 9, 1988
Mr. Kenneth L. Austin, AIA
Senior planner -
CAIN Associates
500 Delaney Avenue
orlando, FL 32801
RECEIVED
JUN 1 3 1988
CANIN ASSOCIATES
In reply refer to:
Mr. Frederick P. Gaske
Historic Pres. planner
(904) 487-2333
Project File No.881370
RE: your Letter of May 26, 1988,
Cultural Resource Assessment Request Duda DRI
Section 17, Township 21 South, Range 31 East, CA Job No. 8507.205, Seminole
County, Florida
Dear Mr. Austin:
In accordance with the provisions of the applicable local ordinance and/or
Sections 253.77__267.061__, 380.06J!j 380.061__ and 403.918(2) (a)6__:-Florida
Statutes, and implenenti ng state regulations, and/or in accordance wi th the
provisions of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (Public Law 89-665)
as .:mended and related federal laws and their implenenting procedures for
federally involved projects , we have reviewed the above cited project(s) to
deteonine its (their) effect-on significant archaeological and historical sites
and properties.
.
A review of the Florida Master site File indicates that no significant
archaeological and/or historical sites are recorded for or considered likely to
be present within the project area(s)~ Because of the project(~) nature it is
considered unlikely that any such sites will be affected . Therefore, it is the
opinion of this office that the proposed project(s) willt1ave no effect on any
sites listed, or eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic
places, or otherwise of national, state or local significance. The project(s)
is(are) consistent with the historic preservation aspects of Florida's coastal
zone program, am may proceed without further involvenent with this agency.
If you have any questions concerning our cormnents, please do not hestiate to
contact us. Your interest and cooperation in nelping to protect Florida's
archaeological and historical resources are appreciated.
Sincerely,
~~ Af7..-:3~ .
; ~ George W. Percy, Di rector
1r'Division of Historical Resources
and
State Historic Preservation Officer
.
GWP /gv
Enclosure ( )
Archaeological Research
(904) 487-2299
Rorida Folklife Programs
(904) 397.2192
Historic Preservation
(904) 487-2333
Museum of Rorida .History
(904) 488-1484
.
.
Appendix D
Eagle Nest Abandonment Letter
.
City of Winter Springs - Oviedo Marketplace
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
March 2001
FLORIDA GAME AND FRESH WATER FISH COMMISSION
. . . ("O~I\"'O~
.OE MARLIN HILLIARD
Clewiston
J. BEN ROWE
Gainesville
JULIE K. MORRIS
Sarasota
QUINTON 1.. HEDGEPETH, DDS
Miami
MRS. GILBERT W. HUMPHREY
Miccosukee
ALLAN L EGDERT, Ph.D.. El<cculive Direclor
WIU-IAM C. SUMNIlR. Auillanl El<.,utivc Director
Ii :.' '"
'l'~ j ',; I :
May 16,
1994
r.-- ---~..- ,'" .., . "
j r-_.... rc:. {(' . . ~ .: \ . 1
\~[ 1':,j'~_~~19~A~l>,
..___------.1
CENTRAL REGION
1239 SW HlIh Slrecl
<kala, FL 34474-2797
\ (904) 732-1225
'\i
,"" : ',\
1:: \ \\
1 !'
I ,:'
:'" \' '.',
Mr. William R. Cox
Kevin L. Erwin Consulting Ecologist, Inc.
2077 Bayside Parkway
Fort Myers, FL 33901
Dear Bill:
.
This letter responds to your request regarding documented
bald eagle nesting activity at terr~tory SE-22 in Seminole
County. Our records indicate that territory SE-22 has not been
occupied by eagles since 1987. According to the "Habitat
Management Guidelines for the Bald Eagle in the Southeastern
Region," territories that, have been unoccupied for ~5 consecutive
years are considered abandoned and no longer subject to the
recommendations set forth in the Guidelines. The Florida Game
and Fresh Water Fish Commission' follows the Guidelines, and
accordingly considers territory SE-22 to be abandoned.'
Sincerely,
CJuk' a . ~'
~lie A. Hovis
Regional Nongame Biologist
ESC 6-1
cc: Mr. Brian Millsap
Mr. Don Wood
'.
L.
ct
1943 - 1993
50 YEARS AS STEWARD OF FLORIDA'S FISH AND WILDLIFE
B~17
L
.
.
Appendix E
Traffic Studies
.
. Oviedo Marketplace
City a/Winter Sprlnf .ve Plan Amendment
Compre ensl March 2001
_i
l;
~
7"
-c;
1:.
:Jt ~
"
~l ~
,J,
-;t.-
,.
-Y-',
',1-
"""I
- .
." .
.:.. .
....
-'
. i r :~.,"~_',
.: ~~.":',~ .
j
:oQe-.
j" . ,;:
::d\.
~
, -~ "
.. ., : 'I ;-f~":'
. ,-
; 1~~ ~:~: ~.~. ;;<'~.'-:.'
:IIi
f'
d1
'~J.,' ~
. . . :o~. '. ,
:;. .:' .,
i
=,:
,
a;j'
:.'
aa
~
. "
~~,
~:
'. ,
..
~\
~'
\
~"i
.
.
.
MONITORINGIMODELING TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
OVIEDO MARKETPLACE
/
Prepared for:
Tllli VIERA COMPANY
Prepared by:
GLA'ITlNG JACKSON KERCHER ANGLIN LOPEZ RINEHART, INC.
August 1999
pagei
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section
Title
Pue
.
1.0
Introduction
1
2.0 Existing Conditions 3
2.1 Roadways
2.2 Intersections
2.3 Progr-ammed Improvements
3.0 Proposed Development 8
3.1" Trip. Generation
3.2 Pass-By Traffic
3.3 Modal Split
3.4 Distribution
3.5 Internal Capture
4.0 Evaluation 20
.
4.1 Land Use Data
4.2 Roadways
4.3 IntersectionslRamps
S.O Projected Improvement Needs 2S
6.0 Conclusions 29
Appendix 30
Traffic Irripact Study
Oviedo Marketplace
August 20,1999
.
.
Page ii
LIST OF FIGURES
Fi~e
~
Title
1-1
2
Site Location
3-1
11
Site Plan
3-2
19
Project Traffic Distribution
4-1
21
PM Peak-Hour Directional Traffic, Year 2005
LIST OF TABLES
Table Title Pa~e
2-1 Summary of Roadway Level of Service, Year 1999 4
2-2 Summary of IntersectionlRamp Level of Service, Year 1999 6
2-3 Planned and Programmed Improvements 7
. 3-1 Summary of Proposed Changes to Approved Development Program 9
3-2 Proposed Development Program 10
3-3 Trip Generation Formulas 12
3-4 Summary of Trip Generation Survey Rates 13
3-5 Summary of Daily and PM Peak-Hour Trip Generation, Year 2005 15
3-6 Summary of PM Peak-Hour Internal Capture 16
3-7 Summary of Pass-by Trips 18
4-2 Summary of Roadway Segment Level of Service, Year 2005 22
4-2 Summary of IntersectionlRamp Level of Service, Year 2005 24
5-1 Summary of Projected Roadway Improvement Needs, Year 2005 26
5-2 Summary of IntersectionlRamp Improvement Needs, Year 2005 28
.
Traffic Impact Study
Oviedo Marketplace
August 20, 1999
.
.
.
Page 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Prior to the initiation of each phase beyond Phase 2, the DR! Development Order for Oviedo
Marketplace requires that a monitoring and modeling program be performed to ascertain the LOS on
facilities where the Oviedo Marketplace project is estimated to contribute an amount of traffic greater
than or equal to five percent (5 %) of the service volume at the standard adopted in the comprehensive
plan of the jurisdiction in which the roadway is located. The Oviedo Marketplace is located on Red
Bug Lake Road adjacent to the GreeneWay (SR417) in Seminole County, Florida (Figure 1-1).
.A Notice of Proposed Change (NOPe) is being prepared by The Viera Company and the Rouse
Company to add land and square footage to the DR! (referred to as Parcel 35) acquired by the Rouse
Company along Oviedo Marketplace Boulevard west of SR426. A separate NOPC is also being
prepared by The Viera Company to reflect proposed changes in land use designations and intensities
within the Viera portion of the DR!. .
This traffic study has been prepared to comply with the provisions of the Development Order for the
purpose of obtaining approval to commence Phase 3 development through build out. The methodology
used in this traffic study is outlined in a letter to Mr. Fred Milch, East Central Florida Regional
Planning Council (Appendix).
This traffic analysis will (1) forecast total +-affic volumes within the primary impact area, (2) forecast
those trips that begin or end within the project site, and (3) identify improvement needs to serve those
future volumes.
For purposes of this traffic study , the Oviedo Marketplace is considered significant and adverse on
those roadway segments and intersections where:
. Trips with one end in the Oviedo Marketplace are projected to equal or exceed five percent
(5 %) of the adopted level of service volume; and
. The projected level of service is below the adopted level of service volume established in the
comprehensive plan of the jurisdiction in which the roadway is located.
The key elements of this Traffic Impact Study include:
Section 2.0, Existing Conditions, summarizes the existing roadway network and outlines the planned
and programmed roadway improvements;
Section 3.0, Proposed Development, presents the proposed development program along with the
estimated trip generation and distribution;
Section 4.0, Evaluation, presents a forecast of Year 2005 traffic volumes; and
Section 5.0, Conclusions, summarizes the findings of this traffic impact study.
Traffic Impact Study
Oviedo Marketplace
August 20, 1999
I . .
rl-t Scale In Il\oUSlnds of Feet
~r-- I
NorlhOl2 5
',I
.1
"
Page 2
3
fl.
~
~
i ~Ir
~~
II!
I
II!
I
.
~Qo
~I.""'.. '
,ao....
~ o.tedo Marl<etpIate
.
figure 1.1
WOOl Map
.
.
.
Page 3
2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS
2.1
Roadways
The existing roadway network is shown on Figure 1-1 and summarized in Table 2-1. Table 2-1 also
shows the number of lanes, facility type, adopted level of service standard, and the service volume at
the adopted standard for each roadway segment. Level of service volumes are presented in Table A-I
(Appendix).
2.2 IntersectionslRamps
Intersections were analyzed based on the 1997 Highway Capacity Manual operational ~...alysis for the
afternoon peak-hour conditions.
. Ramps were analyzed based on the ramp analysis procedures contained in the Highway Capacity
Manual. Ramp service volumes are included in the Appendix.
Table 2-2 summarizes the level of service for intersections and ramps for Year 1999. Copies of the
intersection analyses are contained in the Appendix.
2.3 Planned and Programmed Improvements
Table 2-3 summarizes the road improvements that are planned or programmed within the primary impact
area for the Oviedo Marketplace. These improvements were identified from the Orlando Urban Area
Transportation Improvement Program, 1998/99-2002103, the Seminole County Capital Improvements
Element, the Oviedo Capital Improvements Element, the Winter Springs Capital Improvements Element,
Orange County Capital Improvements Element, and the Florida Department of Transportation Five Year
Work Program. Improvements programmed for the next three years will be considered in this analysis.
While the widening of SR426 from Red Bug Lake Road to Winter Springs Boulevard is not
programmed for construction, it has been considered as a four-lane facility in this study. This section
is programmed for design and right-of-way acquisition. The required study (for amending the MPO's
Long Range Plan) has been submitted and the process should be completed by the end of September.
Once the Long Range Plan has been amended to include SR426 as a four-lane facility. the project will
meet the FDOTrequirements for funding of construction. It is anticipated that construction funding
will be within the next three years. In the event that construction funding is not scheduled within the
next three years, an appropriate condition will be included in the Development Order.
Traffic Impact Study
Oviedo Marketplace
August 20,1999
PIge 4
T.... 2-1
EXJST1NG CONDmONS, YEAR 1'"
o.wo MarblpIace
E+C Senke
LuerI Mcept- VeI_ EDdiB& PM Palt.Bear
Sepoart F8dlIty .... ~ Dally Palt DIredIoul TnfIJc
R-- From . To T.... LOS V.ID1II. K D D1r. NBlEB SBIWB LOS
Sem_ BoaIeYad ('SR 4~ SRSO . u";",,,my Blvd. 6 ART 0 2780 S4.713 0.0740 0..5320 NB 2,1S4 1.895 C
I u";",,,my Blvd. . AIoma Ave. 6 ART 0 :mo 56.020 0.0739 0..5146 NB 2,130 2,009 C
AIoma Ave. . HoweIIllnIIdl R.cI. 6 ART 0 :mo 56.020 0.0762 0..5220 NB 2.22ll 2,040 C
HoweIIllnIIdl R.cI. . ~ Ave. 6 ART 0 :mo 52949 0.0880 O..56llO NB 2,647 2..013 D
LII<emoIrt Ave. . RA:d Ilua LeIte R.cI. 6 ART 0 :mo 92,949 0.0880 O..56llO NB 4,646 3.$34 F
Red Ilua LeIte R.cI. . US 17-92 6 ART 0 :mo 79,410 0.0880 O..56llO E8 3.969 3.019 F
US 17-92. CR 427 6 ART 0 :mo 59,297 0.0880 O..56llO E8 2,964 2,2S4 F
GoIdemad Road /SR 551) SR 50 . \JDivenitv Blvd. 4 ART E 1850 31.692 0.0810 0..s070 S8 1.266 1.301 8
\JDivenitv Blvd. . A10ma Ave. 4 ART E 2200 24,7S4 0.0845 O..5rn NB 1.198 8!l4 C
DocId Rood HoweIIlltoDch R.cI. . Dike R.cI. 4COL E 2200 12,829 0.0910 O..56llO NB 663 S04 8
Dike Rd. . Red - LeIte R.cI. 4COL E 2200 9,975 0.0910 O..56llO NB 516 392 B
TaIkawUIa Road A10ma Ave. . Dike R.cI. 4 ART E 2200 18,390 0.0910 O..56llO NB 951 m 8
Dike Rd. . Red Ilua LeIt. Rd. 6 ART E 3300 25.731 0.0910 O..56llO S8 1.012 1.330 B
Red Ilua LeIte Rd. . LeIte Dr. 4 ART E 2200 25.080 0.0910 O..56llO NB 1,296 9S6 C
LeIte Dr. . Wirlllor Smm.. Blvd. 4 ART E 2200 21.414 0.0910 O..56llO S8 842 1.107 C
Wirlllor Smm.. B1vel. . SR 434 - 4 ART E 2200 14,226 0.0910 0..5680 S8 559 735 B
GncneWav SR5O.1~Blvd. 4 0 3270 38.730 0.0920 0..5680 NB 2,024 1.539 C
\JDivenitv Blvd. . A10ma Ave. 4 0 3270 28.280 0.0920 O..56llO NB 1.478 1.124 B
AIoma Ave. . RA:d _ LeIte R.cI. 4 0 3270 23,200 0.0920 0..5680 NB 1.212 922 B
Red IIua LeIte R.cI. . SR 434 4 0 3270 16000 0.0920 0..5680 NB 836 636 A
SR 434 . LeIte Miiv Blvd. 4 0 3270 14.700 0.0920 0..5680 NB 768 Sll4 A
Dean Rood SR50.1~BIvel. 4 ART E 1850 22.623 0.0!l40 0.5750 S8 904 1,223 B
I u";",,,my Blvd. . McCaIIoc:b Rei. 2 ART E 1710 14.890 0.0974 0..5975 NB 867 Sll4 C
McCaIIoc:b Rd. . A10ma AVOIl11O 2 ART E 1000 15.484 0.0910 0..5680 NB 800 609 D
RoaJO Rd. SR5O.t~Blvd. 2COL E 830 12,078 0.1036 0..5221 NB 653 598 D
SR434 SR SO . 11,,;....;,,' Blvd. 6 ART E :mo 48,429 0.0821 0..5587 NB 2,221 1,755 C
umv.mtv Blvd.. ~- Blvd. 6 ART E :mo 36.906 0.0842 0.6576 NB 2,043 1.064 C
~ Blvd. . McCaIIoc:b R.cI. 6 ART E :mo 36.906 0.0842 0.6576 NB 2,043 1.064 C
McClIIIoch R.cI.. ~ Rd. 6 ART E 3100 32,767 0.0880 O..56llO NB 1,638 1,246 B
CIaDmon R.cI. :AWava Woocb Blvd. 6 ART E 3100 22.214 0.0880 O..56llO NB 1.110 844 A
AIamra Woocb Blvd. . MitdleII Hommoc:k Rd. 6 ART E 3100 30.537 0.0880 O..56llO NB 1.526 1.161 B
MiIcheI1_ Rd. . AIoma Ave. 2 ART D 880 17.338 0.0880 O..56llO 58 659 867 D
A10ma Ave. . a.-.Wav 2 ART 0 880 17.239 0.0880 O..56llO WB 655 862 D
ClrecIulWov. TlIobwillo R.cI. 4 ART 0 2480 18.617 0.0880 O..56llO WB 708 931 B
TasbwiIIo R.cI. . SR 419 4 ART E :l48O 33121 0.0880 0..5680 EB 1656 L259 C
SR419.US 17-92 4 ART E :l48O 26.761 0.0880 O..56llO EB 1.338 1.017 C
US 17-92. CR 427 4 ART E :l48O 34.809 . 0.0880 O..56llO EB 1.740 1.323 D
Lockwood Road McCaIIoc:b Rd.. _ Creek Dr. 4 ART E 1830 11.879 0.0910 O..56llO NB 614 467 8
SomiDole Creek Dr. . Li1de EcoD River 4 ART E 1830 11.879 0.0910 O..56llO NB 614 467 B
Li1de EcoD River. NilcbdI_ Rd. 4 ART E 1830 10.922 0.0910 O..56llO NB 565 429 B
MitdleD_R.cI..SR419 4 ART E 1830 17.923 0.0910 O..56llO NB 926 705 B
SR 419. CR 426 2 ART E 1710 4.0!l4 0.0910 O..56llO NB 212 161 A
McCaIIoc:b Road SR 434 . LocI<wuocI Rd. 4 ART 0 2200 12,244 0.0910 O..56llO EB 633 481 B
um-.itv BoaIevord SR 436. CloIdemocI R.cI. 6 ART E :mo 47.837 0.0lI28 0.6005 EB 2.379 1.582 C
GoIdemod Rd. . EcoD Tr. 6 ART E :mo 44.609 0.0!l46 O..5m EB 2.525 1.695 C
Ecocl Tr. . ClrecIulW.. 6 ART E :mo 44 609 0.0!l46 0..5983 EB 2.525 1.695 C
GnoDeWav. Dean Rd. 6 ART E 2780 56.S86 0.0913 O..5S04 EB 2,844 2.323 F
DeanRd..RoaoeR.cl. 6 ART E :mo 57.266 0.0ll72 0..5049 WB 2,472 2,521 C
Rome RcI..-.....-Tr. 6 ART E :mo 44740 0.0865 0..5815 WB 1620 2250 C
.
.
N_ FociIity type IIIld oeMc:e _ on baed em tile \oc:oI goyemmem _eheDoive'" orllle jaIiodictiaD in wbida tile '-"'"Y __ it 1ocoIIld
~ level of oeMc:e it baed em tile CClIIIpfthemive pIoa ofllle aomty in wbich lIIe '-"'"Y __ it 1ocoIDcI
~ level ofooMce IIIld ooMce _ for tile FlHS is eolobIiIbI by tile FOOT
\leopclIlIiI>Ie _it lIIe _lbot....1IIIIiD-.e reopoaoibiIity for lIIe ....m.y
Sol8ce: GItmmg.ltld=n 1:DeM, A1rgIi1I Lopu IIbtIJart. lite.
.
..,
T.w.a.l (~
EXIS1lNC COrmmONS, YEAR 1'"
I o.w. Marketplace
Page 5
E+C _..
UDerI A&cept- V..... EldJUJt& PM Peak.a....
Sepleat ~ die Accept LOS DaIIJ Peak D\rectIeaaI TraIIJ.
Raadwn Fnm - To LOS IPBlPm V.I_ K D DIr. NBlEB SB/WB LOS
AIoma Avo. /SR 4261 Dan ReI. . Clamnm Rd. 4 ART E 1850 46 606 0.0880 0.5680 NB 2,330 1772 F
IA:emcmt Avo. . SR 436 4 AJl.T E 1850 46.606 0.0703 0.5'794 ED i.&i8 1.378 F
SR 436. GoIdomocl ReI. 4 ART E 1850 38.655 0.0756 0.5469 ED 1,598 1,324 C
OoJdemocl ReI. . HoweIlllnDeh ReI. 4 ART E 1890 27.368 O.onl 0..5710 ED 1.127 847 B
HoweIlllnDeh ReI. - 'TlDbwi1Ia Rd. 4 ART E 2480 29,083 0.0880 0..56llO ED 1.454 1.106 C
'\'12Ibwilla Rd. . ar-Way 4 ART E 2480 29,641 0.0880 O.S6llO WB 1.127 1.482 C
ar-w..,. Dan Rd. 4 ART E 2480 24,344 0.0880 0.5680 EB 1.217 92.S B
Dan ReI. - a.- Rd. 4 ART E 2480 20,157 0.0880 0.5680 NB 1.008 766 B
Clamnm ReI. . SIma ReI. 4 ART E 2480 19,498 0.0880 . O.S6llO NB 975 741 B
SIma Rd. . MitdIoII HIDlIDOCk ReI. 4 ART E 2480 19.498 0.0880 0.5680 NB 975 741 B
MitdtdI HIDlIDOCk ReI. . Oviedo Blvd. 4 AJl.T D 18$0 24,401 0.0880 0.5680 NB 1.220 928 B
o.riedo Blvd. . Winter SPriDllII Blvd. 4 ART D 18$0 24.401 0.0880 0..5680 NB 1,220 928 B
W. B:oadwavSt. /SR4261 Wm1z:r SJlriDao Blvd. - Lab Jeooup Dr. 2 ART D 880 18.740 0.0701 O.S6llO ED 746 568 C
Lab ha1m Dr. . SR 434 2 ART D 880 12,458 o.ons 0..5507 ED 532 434 B
0..... Dr. (CR 426\ CR 419 . Loekwood ReI. 2COL E 1000 7,729 0.0910 0.5680 EB 399 304 A
Lockwood ReI. . Seminole WoocIJ Blvd. 2COL D 1000 6,992 0.0910 0..56llO ED 361 275 A
Hondio Avarae US 17-92. ThiIll. 1A 4 ART D 1850 35 096 0.0llS I 0.6253 EB 1.868 1119 F
HoweIJ Broneh ThiIde 1A - Lab Howell Rd. 4 ART D 1850 26.792 0.0910 O.S6llO EB 1,385 1.053 C
Like Howell Rd. - SR 436 4 AJl.T D 18$0 30.362 0.0910 0.56llO EB 1.569 1.194 C
SR 436 - Dik. Rd. 4 ART l>+20'1f0 2220 24.382 0.0910 O..56llO EB 1.260 959 B
Dike ReI. . Dodd Rd. 4 ART l>+20'1f0 2220 14.464 0.0910 0.5680 ED 748 569 B
Dodd ReI.. ~Avo. 4 ART l>+20'1f0 2220 14.783 0.0910 0.5680 EB 764 581 B
Dike Rood HoweIJ IIrInch Rd. . Dodd Rd 2 ART E 1000 8.777 0.0910 0.5680 NB 454 345 A
Dodd ReI. . '1'aIb1riIIa ReI. 2 ART E 1000 7,379 0.0910 0.56llO WB 290 381 A
SIma Rood Red ll1Ia Lake ReI. . ~ Ave. 2 ART E 1000 6.937 0.0910 O.S6llO ED 359 273 A
Red _ Lab Rood SR 436 - Winter Pat ReI. 6 ART E 3300 52,270 0.0910 0.5680 EB 2,702 2,055 E
W_ Pat ReI. . Eoahl Cin:Ie 6 ART E 3300 52,270 0.0910 0.5680 EB 2,702 2,OS5 E
I \!oaIe Circle . Noddina PiDa Wov 4 ART E 2200 42,567 0.0910 O.S6llO EB 2,200 1.673 0
NoddiDa PiDa Way - Dodd Rd. 4 ART E 2200 42,567 0.0910 0.5680 EB 2.200 1.673 0
Dodd ReI. - Tad:awUlt. ReI. 4 ART E 2200 42,567 0.0910 0..56llO ED 2.200 1.673 0
1'llabwilIa ReI. . SlID Dr. 6 ART E 3300 32,151 0.0910 0.5680 EB 1,662 1.264 C
SlID Dr. . Citno ReI. 6 ART E 3300 31556 0.0910 0.5680 EB 1631 1.241 C
Citno Rd. . S\a9ia Rd. 6 ART E 3300 34.974 0.0910 O..56llO EB 1.808 1,375 C
SIma ReI. . Site Entrmce (_I 6 ART E 3300 27.499 0.0910 0.5680 EB 1.421 1.081 B
Site Entrmce (_I - Doveno Rd. 6 ART E 3300 27.499 0.0910 0.5680 EB 1.421 1,081 B
Doveno Rd. . Oviedo Blvd. 6 ART E 3300 27.499 0.0910 0.5680 EB 1,421 1.081 B
Oviedo Blvd. - T_ EntIDce 6 ART E 3300 27.499 0.0910 O..56llO EB 1421 1.081 B
~_Rood ITonzel Entrmce . ClreeIleWay 6 ART E 3300 27.499 0.0910 O..56llO EB 1,421 1,081 B
ar-Wov-~Ave. 6 ART E 3300 35.756 0.0910 0.5680 EB 1,848 1.406 0
_Ave. .SR434 4 ART E 1850 30.134 0.0830 0..5980 EB 1,496 1.005 C
SR 434. Loekwood Rd. 4 ART E 1850 23.469 0.0830 0..5980 EB 1,165 783 B
ClloDman Rd. SR 426 . SR 434 4COL E 2200 11.097 0.0910 0.5680 EB 574 436 B
ScminoIo Boa1evard US 17-92 - Lake Dr. 4COL D 2200 15,232 0.0910 0..56llO EB 787 599 B
Lab Drive S<mioola Blvd. . ThlkawUlt. Rd. 4COL E 2200 9.971 0.0910 0.5680 ED 515 392 B
CR419 SR 434 - Lockwood Rd. 2COL E 1000 9.893 0.0910 0.5680 EB 511 389 B
LoekwoocI ReI. - _ St. 4COL E 1850 15.145 0.0910 0.5680 EB 783 59S B
WiDlierSIlimD _ SR426. Nortbem WOV 4COL D 1640 12.260 0.0910 0.5680 WB 634 482 C
Nadbom Way. Nortbem Way 2COL D 830 7.284 0.0910 O..56llO WB 376 286 C
Nor-.. Way. '\'12Ibwilla ReI. 2COL D 830 7.384 0.0910 0.5680 EB 382 290 c
- - mtlOt S EB 2m "7 (;
N_ fW:iIity type 1Illd.me. __ on _ OIl dlo loc:ol ~ _............ pbm .fthe jmiodic:lion ill wllicIl the....tony ~it_
AcceptBhlc lcYel of.rW::e d __ OIl tho ~,...~... pan oftbe county in which the 'R*tway tepDart ialooated
Aeceplable _ of.me. 0Dd..m.e __ for the F1HS it ooIobIiIbed by the moT
a.pm.ibIo......,. io dlo __ boo __ nopoaibility forthe....tony
Scuru: GIDlttng J<1datm XI,.., M&fJn Lt1pc IUneJtan. /no.
.
Page 6
Table 2-2
.
SUMMARY OF PM PEAK-HOUR INTERSECI'ION
LEVEL OF SERVICE, YEAR 1999
Oviedo Marketplace
No. Intenection Accept. Existing
No. Location Phases Control LOS LOS-
INTERSECTIONS
1 Red BU2 Lake Road SR436 3 Sismal D F
2 Red Bug Lake Road Dodd Road 4 Signal E C
3 Red B~ Lake Road Tuskawilla Road 4 Sismal E D
4 Red BU2 Lake Road ( Sun Drive 4 Signal E C
5 Red ~ Lake Road ( Citrus Road 4 Sismal E C
6 Red B~ Lake Road ( Slavia Road 2 Signal E B
7 Red B~ Lake Road ( Devera Road 5 Sismal E C
8 Red Bug Lake Road Oviedo MarketPlace Blvd. 4 Sismal E C
9 Red BU2 Lake Road ( GreeneWav ramps west 2 Sismal D A
10 Red B~ Lake Road ( GreeneWay ramps east 3 Sismal D B
11 Red Bug Lake Road ( SR426 4 Signal E D
12 Mitchell Hammock Road ~ Lockwood Boulevard 4 Sismal E F
13 Tuskawilla Road ( Dike Road 3 Sism.al E B
14 Tuskawilla Road ( Lake Drive 3 Sism.al E C
15 Tuskawilla Road ( Winter Soriwts Boulevard 4 Signal D F
16 SR434 Chapman Road 4 Sismal E F
17 SR434 ) Alafava Woods Boulevard 3 Sism.al E C
18 SR434 Mitchell Hammock Road 4 SilaUll D D
19 SR434 SR426 4 SilaUll D D
20 SR434 GreeneWay ramps east 2 Signal D B
21 SR434 ( GreeneWay ramps west 2 Sismal D A
22 SR434 ( Tuskawilla Road 4 Sismal D C
23 SR434 (, SR419 3 SilaUll D C
24 SR426 (l Tuskawilla Road 3 SilaUll E B
25 SR426 >. GreeneWay ramps west 3 Signal D B
26 SR426 ~ GreeneWay ramps east 3 Sismal D B
27 SR426 Dean Road 3 Sismal E D
28 SR426 Chapman Road 3 Sismal E F
29 SR426 Oviedo Marketplace Boulevard 3 SilaUll D B
30 SR426 ( Winter Sprin~ Boulevard 3 Signal D C
31 SR426 ~ Lake Jessup Avenue 2 Sism.al ' D B
32 Lockwood Boulevard (@ CR419 4 SilaUll D C
Ser. VoL Peak-bour Accept. E1istin2
Location (a1 StcL Volume LOS LOS
RAMPS
1 Red BU2 Lake Rd. to SR417 NB 1600 166 D A
2 Red Bwz Lake Rd. to SR417 SB 1600 598 D A
3 SR417 SB to Red Bug Lake Road 1600 289 D A
4 SR417 NB to Red Bug Lake Road 1600 892 D B
5 SR417NB to SR434 1600 429 D A
6 SR434 to SR417 SB 1600 239 D A
7 SR426 to SR417 NB 1600 216 D A
8 SR417 SB to SR426 1600 154 D A
.
Source:
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
.
.
I
T~ble 2.
. j
. l'age 7
I
PLANNED AND PROGRAMMED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
Oviedo Marketplace
Segment Length Start Responsible
Roadway From - To Improvement (MOes) Phase Date Agency Status
SR434 Tuskawilla Rd. - SR417 Widen to four lanes 2.0 CST 2000 FOOT Programmed
CR419 Lockwood Blvd. - Oviedo City Limits Widen to four lanes 2.3 CST 1999 Seminole County Programmed
CR419 Oviedo City Limits- Second Street Widen to four lanes 1.0 CST 2000 Seminole County Programmed
Dodd Road Red Bug Lake Road - Howell Branch Road Widen to four lanes ~ 1.9 CST 2000 Seminole County Programmed
Winter Park Drive Red Bug Lake Rd. - Seminola Blvd. Reconstruct to two-lane divided 2.0 CST 2000 Seminole County Programmed
SR417 US 17-92 . Lake Mary Blvd. New four lane toll road 1.7 CST 2000 ~em. County Expy. Auth Programmed
SR417 Lake Mary Blvd. - Rinehart Rd. New four lane toll road 2.5 CST 2001 ~em. County Expy. Auth Programmed
1-4 @ SR417 New interchange - - CST ,2000 FOOT Programmed
Mitchell Hammock Road @ Lockwood Boulevard Add ED left tum lane - . CST 2002 Developer Programmed
East Lake Drive Semina1a Blvd. . Tuskawilla Rd. Widen to four lanes 2.5 CST 2000 Seminole cOunty Programmed
SR426 SR417 - Mitchell Hammock Rd. Widen to four lanes 3.3 CST 1999 FOOT Programmed
Red Bug Lake Road SR436 . Eagle Circle Widen to six lanes 0.7 CST 2001 Seminole County Programmed
Champan Road SR426 - SR434 Widen to four lanes I.S CST 2001 Seminole County Programmed
SR434 McCulloch Rd. - Mitchell Hammock Rd. Widen to six 1ailes 3.0 CST 2001 FOOT Prol!l'llllUlled
Notes:
CST - Construction
Source: Orlando Urban Area Transportation Improvement Program. 1998/99 - 2002/3
Seminole County Traffic Circulation Elemenl Project Schedule
-'
Page 8
3.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
The Oviedo Marketplace DR! is located on Red Bug Lake Road adjacent to the GreeneWay in
northeast Seminole County, Florida (Figure 1-1). The existing and proposed land uses include a
regional shopping center, associated retail, restaurants, office, residential dwelling units and an
extension of the Winter Park Hospital.
.
..",
The Development Order for the Substantial Deviation contains a footnote to the table summarizing the
approved and proposed development program relating to the conversion of mall square footage to
movie theater square footage. Because the only empirical trip generation data for movie theaters at the
time of the Development Order was the ITE Trip Generation Report. the conversion was based on
1.3: 1.0 ratio of mall square footage to movie theater square footage. The movie theater trip generation
rate contained in ITE (code 444) is based on only one survey. This MonitoringlModeling study
provides an in-depth trip generation survey conducted at the onsite Regal Theater. The survey data
rebuts the presumption that the movie theater produces more trips per 1,000 square than the mall does.
The results show the following: 1,200.000 square foot mall = 3,237 pm peak-hour trip ends (2.6975
trip ends per 1.000 square feet) and the 100.000 square foot Regal Theater = 160 pm peak-hour trip
ends (1.60 trip ends per 1.000 square feet). Therefore. the actual conversion should be 1.0:0.6,
however. this study is based on a ratio of 1.0:1.0, restoring the mall to its original square footage.
3.1 Trip Generation
Trip generation for the Oviedo Marketplace land uses is based on the ITE Trip Generation Repon. 6th
Edition and surveys conducted at the site. Trip generation rates/formulas are presented in Table 3-3
and a summary of surveyed rates is presented in Table 3-4. Daily and pm peak-hour trip generation
for Year 2005 is presented in Table 3-5.
3.2 Internal Capture
Internal trips are those which begin and end within the project site. External trips have either an
origin or destination outside the project site.
Internal trips were estimated for work-based shopping/eating trips and for interaction between the
hospital and medical office and medical office and retail/restaurant. Afternoon peak-hour internal
capture is estim~ted at about 6.0% of the total trip generation. Estimates of internal capture for the
afternoon peak-hour are summarized in Table 3-5.
Traffic Impact Study
Oviedo Marketplace
August 20, 1999
.
ra
Page 9
Table 3-1
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGES TO APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
OvIedo Marketplace
ADDroved Land Use Parc:el Intensltv Pronosed Land Use Parc:el lntensltv
hase 1 Phase 1
Office 18 50,050 SF Office 18 50,050 SF
Office 19 37,750 SF Office 19 37,750 SF
Office 20 14,330 SF Convenience wi1b 285 20 2,720 SF
Chills 21A 5,683 SF Chills 21A 5,683 SF
Target and Garden Center 21B 128,634 SF Tllt2et and Garden Center 21B 128,634 SF
Wellness Center 22 35,000 SF Wel1ness Center 22 39,000 SF
I Krystal 23 3,000 SF Commercial Retail 23 12,205 SF
Fast Food 24A 6,000 SF Stealc-o-Sbake 24A 3,508 SF
NfA 24B o SF Retail 224B 14,m SF
F azoll's 25 3,206 SF Fazoli's 25 3,206 SF
Convenience Marlc:et 26A 3,000 SF Borders Books 26 24,610 SF
NfA 26B o SF Jared Jewelers 26 6,052 SF
Quality Sit-Down Restaurant -28 1,000 SF Quality Sit-Down Restaurant 28 11,200 SF
Family Funeral Care 29 8,682 SF Familv Funeral Care 29 8,682 SF
Fast Food 30 3,000 SF HiM Turnover Restaurant 30 7,000 SF
Fast Food 31 3,000 SF Rctai.I 31 15,000 SF
Office 32 70,000 SF Quality Sit-Down Restaurant 32 6,700 SF
Phase 2 Phase 2
Regional Shopping Center 12 1,070,000 SF Regional Sholllring Center 12 1,100,000 SF
Movie Theater 12 100,000 SF Movie Theater 12 100,000 SF
High- Turnover Restaurant 16 9,500 SF Retail 16 30,000 SF
High- Turnover Restaurant 16 10,500 SF NfA 16 o SF
Medical Campus - Retail 17 10,000 SF Medical Campus - Retail 17 10,000 SF
Medical Campus - Medical Office 27 50,000 SF Medical Campus - Medical Office 27 40,139 SF
Medical CamPUS - Medical Office 27 25,000 SF Medical Campus - Medical Office 27 34,861 SF
Medical Campus - Dianostic Services 27 12,000 SF Medical Campus - Dianostic Services 27 12,000 SF
Medical Campus - Walk-In Clinic 27 . 4,500 SF Medical Campus - Walk-In Clinic 27 5,981 SF
Medical Campus - Ambulatorv SUI'2erv Center 27 12,000 SF Medical CamDUS - Ambulatory SUl2erv Center 27 12,000 SF
fA 35 o SF High Turnover Restaurant 35 7,000 SF
fA 35 o SF High Turnover Restaurant 35 5,600 SF
fA 35 o SF Hi2h Turnover Restaurant 35 3,200 SF
N/A 35 o SF Qualitv Sit-Down Restaurant 35 7,000 SF
N/A 35 o SF Qualitv Sit-Down Restaurant 35 6,400 SF
NfA 35 o SF Quality Sit-Down Restaurant 35 7,300 SF
N/A 35 o SF Retail 35 13,500 SF
Phase 3 - Phase 3 -
Retail 13 180,000 SF Retail 13 180,000 SF
High Turnover Restaurant 13 10,000 SF High Turnover Restaurant 13 10,000 SF
High Turnover Restaurant 13 10,000 SF Hi2h Turnover Restaurant 13 10,000 SF
High Turnover RcsIaurant 13 10,000 SF N/A 13 o SF
Retail 14 50,000 SF Rctai.I 14 160,000 SF
Office 14 57,000 SF N/A 14 o SF
Medical Campus - Medical Office 15 59,000 SF Medical Campus - Medical Office 15 59,000 SF
Medical Campus - HoSDi1al 27 120 Beds Medical CamPUS - HOSiiilaI 27 120 Beds
Office/Showroom 34 60,000 SF Office fShowroom 34 60,000 SF
Sin2le Familv 36 4 DU Sinll1e F8miJv 36 4 DU
StNrce: TM Vinv Company
TM Rauu Canrpany
Oviedo Cromng DRl Sub#JlntiDl Dmatian, 1994
Glatting Jadaan Kndt4r Anglin Lope RiMJuut.lru:.
.
Page 10
Table 3-2
SUMMARY OF APPROVEDIPROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Oviedo Marketplace
""
Ilntensity
Phases 1 & 2 Phase 3 (2001)
Land Use Parcel Constnlcted Prooosed Prooosed Total
Phase 1
Office 18 OSF 50,050 SF 0 SF 50,050 SF
Office 19 OSF 37,750 SF 0 SF 37.750 SF
Convenience with gas 20 OSF 2,720 SF 0 SF 2,720 SF
Chilis 21A 5,683 SF OSF 0 SF 5,683 SF
Target and Garden Center 21B 128,634 SF OSF 0 SF 128.634 SF
WeUness Center 22 39.000 SF OSF 0 SF 39.000 SF
Commercial Retail ~ 12;205 SF o SF 0 SF 12;205 SF
Steak-n-Shake 24 3.508 SF o SF 0 SF 3,508 SF
Fazoli's 25 3;206 SF o SF 0 SF 3;206 SF
Borders Books 26 24,610 SF OSF 0 SF 24,610 SF
Jared Jewelers 26 6,052 SF OSF 0 SF 6,052 SF
Quality Restaurant 28 o SF 11;200 SF 0 SF 11;200 SF
Fami1v Funeral Care 29 8,682 SF SF 0 SF 8.682 SF
Hi2h Turnover Restaurant 30 --SF 7,000 SF 0 SF 7.000 SF
Retail 31 --SF 15,000 SF 0 SF 15.000 SF
Quality Restaurant 32 -- SF 6,700 SF 0 SF 6,700 SF
Phase 2
Re,Uonal ShopDinIt Center 12 730,128 SF 369.872 SF 0 SF 1,100,000 SF
Movie Theater 12 22 Screens o Screens 0 Screens 22 Screens
Retail 16 --SF 30,000 SF 0 SF 30,000 SF
Medical Campus - Retail 17 --SF 10.000 SF 0 SF 10,000 SF
Medical Campus - Medical Office 27 40.139 SF SF 0 SF 40.139 SF
Medical Campus - Medical Office 27 --SF 34,861 SF 0 SF 34,861 SF
Medical Campus - Dianostic Services 27 --SF 12,000 SF 0 SF 12,000 SF .
Medical CamDUS - Walk-In Clinic 27 5,981 SF SF 0 SF 5,981 SF
Medical Campus - Ambulatory Surgery Center 27 OSF 12.000 SF 0 SF 12,000 SF
HiIZh Turnover Restaurant 35 OSF 7.000 SF 0 SF 7,000 SF
High Turnover Restaurant 35 OSF 5.600 SF 0 SF 5,600 SF
High Turnover Restaurant 35 o SF 3;200 SF 0 SF 3;200 SF
Qualitv Restaurant 35 OSF 7.000 SF 0 SF 7.000 SF
Quality Restaurant 35 OSF 6,400 SF 0 SF 6.400 SF
Quality Restaurant 35 OSF 7,,300 SF 0 SF 7,,300 SF
Retail 35 OSF 13,500 SF 0 SF 13,500 SF
Phase 3 -
Retail 13 OSF OSF 180,000 SF 180,000 SF
High Turnover Restaurant 13 OSF OSF 10.000 SF 10.000 SF
Hiah Turnover Restaurant 13 OSF OSF 10,000 SF 10.000 SF
Retail 14 OSF OSF 160,000 SF 160,000 SF
Medical Campus - Medical Office 15 OSF OSF 59.000 SF 59,000 SF
Medical Campus - Hospital 27 OSF OSF 120 SF 120 SF
Office IShowroom 34 OSF OSF 60,000 SF 60.000 SF
Sin2le F8MilV (36) o DU o DU 4 DU 4 DU
........
Sotucc: 1M V_a Company
1M Rouse Company
Glatting Jadcsan K.n:bu Anglin Lopez RiMJuzrt. Inc.
.
EIIo
Page II
.
-,.
.-..:;.j.......
::';
: I
, I
__.:i:l._...
..Jt..-._.
~_....
_...::~.... -.
/~/)~~){~:{N:.,:...
.
Proposed
Driveway
Legend
City of Oviedo Jurisdiction
.
Figure 3-1
MaSler Plan
~I G....TTI"G
J&CUOJlf
u..c....
.."OLl.
LO...
&1......a..aT
Oviedo Marketplace
ffi
Scale In Feet 1'" 1200'
~
o 600' 1200'
~
.
.
.
Figure 3-1
Site Plan
Page 11
Traffic Impact Study
Oviedo Marketplace
August 20, 1999
"U06..... "..
Table 3-3
TRIP GENERATION FORMULAS
Oriedo Markdplace
~-'
ITE
Land Use Code Fonnula Direction
Showroom
Dailv 150 T a 4.96(KSFl --
PM 150 Lu(T) a 0.754 Ln(KSF) + 0.826 24%m
Siii2fe F8iiii1v
Daily 210 Lu(T) c 0.920 Ln(KSF) + 2.707 - -
PM 210 Lnm a 0.901 Ln(KSF) + 0.527 64%m
Hosp1iiil
Daily 610 T -7.38lCHeC1S1 + 1718.324 --
PM 610 Tel ) 34% m
Clinic
DailV 630 T a 31.4~(JUiF) - -
PM Survey T a 5.1SlKSFl 50%m
Walk-In Clinic
IJ81lV 630. T = 31.45(KSF) - -
PM (2) IT c 8.6942(KSF) 31%m
Oftice
Dailv -- 710 Lo(T) .. 0.768 Ln(KSFl + 3.654 --
PM 710 T" 1.121(KSF) + 79.295 17"10 m
Mea1ca1 Office
Daily 720 T - 4O.892(KSF) - 214.970 - -
PM 720 I Lnm a 0.9211.nlK SF + 1.476 27%m
Tiiil!et With Garden Center
Dailv 8151817 T" 54.12lKSF) - -
PM (1) T" 3.l2lKSF) 53%m
Retail .
-Diiify 520 Lo(T) a 0.643 Ln<KSF) +5.866 --
PM 820 Ln(T) .. 0.660 LnlKSrl + 3.403 48% in
Borders Books
Dailv 814 T c 4O.67(KSFl --
PM (2) T a 1.9169UUii' 67%m
ared Jewelers
Daily 514 T c 4O.67(KSF) --
p1\{ (2) T = 9.2982lKSF) 36%m
Quality SIt-Down Restaurant
Dailv 831 T a 89.98(KSF) --
PM 831 T a 7.4~JUiI"1 67%m
High- Turnover Restaurant
Dailv 832 1 .. 130.34(KSrl - -
PM 832 T c 10.~KSF) 60%m
Fast Food Restaurant
Dailv 834 T c 496.12(KSI"1 --
PM 834 T" 33.48(KSF) 52%m
Chills
1JaIJY 832 T = 130.34(KSF) - -
PfJ- (1) T = 11.97(KSF) 64%m
Fazolls
Dailv 832 T" 130.34(KSFl - -
PM (1) IT a 17.7SlKSF) 62%m
Steak.-n-Shake
Daily 832 T c 130.34(l(SF) - -
PM (1) T= 14. .57%m
Wenness Center
Daily 493 T a 43.00 - -
PM (1) T 4.17 56%m
Re2a1lbeater
Daily 444 T'"' 153.33(Screen) - -
PM (1) T = 7.27(Screen) 38%m
Convenience M811cet wI 2&S
Daily 853 T'"' F) - -
-PM 853 T = 6O.61(KSFl 50%m
Funcn1 Home
Dailv (3) Ta9& --
PM (3) TaO. 1') 54% in
.
.
(1) Trip gc:ncntion forthe PM peak-bour for Teset with Garden Center. 0U\is, FtIl.ll!is, Stealt-o-SbW. RepI Tbea%er end
the We1Iness Center was estimated on ~ conducted at \he Oviedo Markdp1ace during J\IlIC IIld July 1998. DIIiIy
trip galCl'lltion was estimaIed using the IIE Trip Gcnemtion Report. SilcSh Edition. TCFt with GanIen Center was baed
on IIE c:odes 81S IIld 817.
(2) Trip generation for \he PM peak-bour for borden boob.18I'ad Je'ftIen end \he WaIk.In Clinic was csIimaIed baed on
Sl\I\'eYS candw:Icd at \he Oriedo Mmb:tp1ace during Apri1 end May 1999. Dai1y trip genr:raDon was csIimaIed using \he
IIE Trip Generation Rcport. SilcSh Edition.
(3) Trip generation for the fImcnI home _ asumed to be very similar to a c:hun:h. therefore. the IIE trip
gaIClBlion mtes for a c::hurch ere used.
&nut:c: ITE Trip a-ralJcm Rqort, Sixth Edilicn. 1997
GWtiIIg JtlIiccft KIrthu Anglin lApc RiMhart. 1rIC.
.
,-
Page 13
Table 3-4
.
TRIP GENERATION SURVEYS
Oviedo Marketplace
Land Use Fazolis Restaurant
Survey Square PM Peak-Hour Traffic PM Peak-Hour Perc:mt
Date Feet In Out Total Rate Per KSF InbotDld
6-23-98 3,206 40 26 66 20.59 61%
6-24-98 3,206 26 15 41 12.79 63%
6-25-98 3,206 40 24 64 19.96 63%
Avenur.e 3206 35 22 57 17.78 62./.
Land Use Cbilis Restaurant
Survey Square PM Peak-Hour Traffic PM Peak-Hour Percent
Date Feet In Out Total Rate Per KSF Inbo1Dld
6-23-98 5,683 35 28 63 11.09 56%
6-24-98 5,683 46 23 69 12.14 67%
6-25-98 5,683 50 20 70 12.32 71%
AVeraJ1:e 5683 44 24 68 11.97 64%
Land Use Wellness Center
Survey Square PM Peak-Hour Traffic PM Peak-Hour Percent
Date Feet In Out Total . Rate Per KSF InbOlDld
6-23-98 39,000 96 72 168 4.31 57%
6-24-98 39,000 97 78 175 4.49 55%
6-25-98 39,000 80 65 145 3.72 55%
Avenuze 39 000 91 72 163 4.17 56-1.
.
Land Use Target and Garden Center
Survey Square PM Peak-Hour Traffic PM Peak-Hour Percent
Date Feet In Out Total Rate Per KSF Inbo1Dld
6-23-98 128,634 201 198 399 3.10 50%
6-24-98 128,634 215 177 392 3.05 55%
6-25-98 128,634 220 193 413 3.21 53%
Avenur.e 128 634 212 189 401 3.12 53%
Land Use Steak-n-Shake
Survey Square PM Peak-Hour Traffic PM Peak-Hour Percent
Date Feet In Out Total Rate Per KSF Inbo1Dld
6-23-98 3.508 25 21 46 13.11 54%
6-24-98 3,508 22 19 41 11.69 54%
6-25-98 3.508 39 26 65 18.53 60%
Avenuze 3508 29 22 51 14.44 57-1.
Land Use Regal Theater
.
Survey PM Peak-Hour Traffic PM Peak-Hour Percent
Date Screens In Out Total Rate Per KSF Inbound
07-09-98 22 50 111 161 7.32 31%
07-15-98 22 60 138 198 9.00 30%
07-28-98 22 55 87 142 6.45 39%
07-29-98 22 64 57 121 5.50 53%
07-30-98 22 71 105 176 8.00 40%
Avenuze 22 60 100 160 7.27 38.;'
Source:
GlaIting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
Page 14
Table 3-4 (Continued)
TRIP GENERATION SURVEYS
Oviedo Marketplace
.
Land Use
Borders Books
.",....
Survey Square PM Peak-Hour Traffic PM Peak-Hour Percent
Date Feet In Out Total Rate Per KSF Inbound
4-19-99 25,040 40 20 60 2.40 67%
5-18-99 25,040 34 15 49 1.96 69%
5-19-99 25,040 23 13 36 1.44 64%
A veral!e 25 040 32 16 48 1.92 67%
Land Use
Jared Jewelers
Survey Square PM Peak-Hour Traffic PM Peak-Hour Percent
Date Feet In Out Total Rate Per KSF Inbound
4-19-99 5,700 19 30 49 8.60 39%
5-18-99 5,700 14 41 55 9.65 25%
5-19-99 5,700 25 31 56 9.82 45%
A verae:e 5700 19 34 53 9.30 360/0
Land Use
Walk-In Clinic
.
Survey Square PM Peak-Hour Traffic PM Peak-Hour Percent
Date Feet In Out Total Rate Per KSF Inbound
4-19-99 5,981 8 28 36 6.02 22%
5-18-99 5,981 28 54 82 13.71 34%
5-19-99 5,981 12 27 39 6.52 31%
A veralZe 5981 16 36 52 8.69 31%
Source:
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
.
~
.
-
.
.
Page 15
Table 3-5
SUMMARY OF DAILY AND PM PEAK-HOUR TRIP GENERATION, YEAR 2005
OvIedo Marketplace
DaDy DaDy PM Peak-Hour
. Land Use Parcel ITE Intensttv Trip Ends Rate Total Rate In Out
Phase 1. & 1b - Approved
O1Dce 18 710 50,050 GFA 780 0.0 135 0.0 23 112
Ulllce 19 710 37,750 GFA 628 16.6 122 3.2 21 101
Couvcmeoce With gas 20 853 2,720 GFA 2,300 845.6 170 62.6 85 85
Chills 21A (l) 5,683 GFA 741 130.3 68 12.0 42 26
Target wi1h Garden Center 21B (I) 128,634 GLA 6,932 53.9 401 3.1 213 lS9
Wellness Center 22 (1) 39,000 GFA 1,677 43.0 163 4.2 91 72
Retail 23 820 12,205 GLA 1,763 144.4 157 12.8 75 81
Steak-o-Sbake 24 (1) 3,508 GFA 457 130.3 51 14.4 29 22
Ke1aiI 24W 820 14,!H7 GLA 2,013 134.2 180 12.0 86 93
azol1s 2:1 (1) 3,206 GtoA 418 130.3 57 17.8 35 22
Borders BooICS 26 (2) 24,610 GFA 1,001 40.7 47 1.9 32 16
Jared Jewelers 26 (2) 6,052 GFA 246 40.7 56 9.3 20 36
Quality Restaurant - 28 831 11,200 GLA 1,007 90.0 84 7.5 56 28
Family FlU1eral Care 29 (3) 8,682 GFA 79 9.1 6 0.7 3 3
High Turnover Restaurant 30 832 7,000 GFA 912 130.3 76 10.9 46 30
Retail 31 820 15,000 GLA 2,013 134.2 180 12.0 86 93
Quality Restaurant 32 831 6,700 GFA 603 90.0 50 7.5 34 17
Phase 2 - Approved
Regtonal Shoppmg Center 12 820 1,100,000 GLA 31,856 29.0 3,056 2.8 1,467 1,589
MOVIe Theater 12 (6) 22 Sa. 3,373 153.3 160 7.3 61 99
Retail 16 820 30,000 GLA 3,143 104.8 284 9.5 136 148
Medical Campus - R.e1ail 17 820 10,000 GLA 1,551 155.1 137 13.7 66 71
Medical Campus - Medical O1Dce 27 720 40,139 GFA 1,426 35.5 131 3.3 35 96
Medical Campus - Medical Ulllce 27 720 34,861 GFA 1,211 34.7 115 3.3 31 84
Medical Campus - Diagnostlc Center 27 (4) 12,000 GFA 377 31.5 62 5.2 2S 37
Medical Campus - Walk-In Cl1mc T1 (2) 5,981 GI'A 1118 31.5 52 8.7 16 36
Medical Campus - Ambulatorv Surgery Center 27 (4) 12,000 GFA 377 31.5 62 5.2 25 37
High Turnover Restaurant 35 832 7,000 GFA 912 130.3 76 10.9 46 30
HiRh Turnover Restaurant 35 832 5,600 GFA 730 130.3 61 10.9 36 24
High Turnover Restaurant 35 832 3,200 GFA 417 130.3 35 10.9 21 14
:Qual1ty Restaurant 35 831 7,000 GI'A 630 90.0 52 7.5 35 17
IQuality Restamant 35 831 6,400 GFA 576 90.0 48 7.5 32 16
Quality Restamant 35 831 7,300 GM 657 90.0 55 7.5 37 18
Retail 35 820 13,500 GLA 1,881 139.3 167 12.4 80 87
PROPOSED (phase 3)
Retai1 13 820 180,000 GLA 9,947 55.3 926 5.1 444 481
High Turnover Restaurant 13 832 10,000 GFA 1,303 130.3 109 10.9 65 43
High Turnover Restamant 13 832 10,000 GFA 1,303 130.3 109 10.9 65 43
Retai1 14 820 160,000 GLA 9,222 57.6 S56 5.4 411 445
Medical Campus - Medical O1Dce 15 720 59,000 GM 2,198 37.2 187 3.2 51 137
Medical CamPUS - HOSll11al 27 610 120 Beds 2,604 21.7 146 1.2 50 'in
O1DcelShowroom 34 (5) 60.000 GLA 861 14.4 138 2.3 26 112
Single Family Residen1ial 36 210 4 D 54 13.4 b 1.5 4 2
Total 100,367 9,032 4,243 4,789
Internal C8.I)1Ure 7,496 488 244 244
TfUlStt 500 100 50 50
Pass-By 5,634 458 229 229
mal 86.737 7.986 3720 4.266
GF A - gross floor lira
GLA - gross lcaable area
(1) Trip generation for the PM peak-hour for Chills. FIIZD!is, Stak-n-Shake, Tcget with Garden Center and the Wellness Center is estimated baed on
surveys conducted at the Oviedo Markdp1ace during 1une 1998. Daily trip genemlion is baed on rrE rates.
(2) Trip genenation for the PM peak-hour for BlIJ'CIe:s Books, 1m'eC11cwelen and the Walk-In Clinic is estimated baed On surveys conducted at the Oviedo Makelplace during
April 1m. Dai1y trip generation is b8sed on Il'E rates.
(3) Trip genenation for the Funeral Home was lIS3UlIICd tD be vay similar tD a c:Iwn:h, the!d'orc. the rrE trip genenation \'lIIt:S
for a c:Iwrr:b were used.
(4) Trip genenation for the Diagnostic Center. Urgent Care Center and AmbuIatDIy SlqeJy Center _ estimated using the clinic nIe (Walk-In Clinic PM nIe baed on suney).
(5) Offi~ was calc:u1a1ed 8130"/0 office and 70''/0 sbowroom
(6) Trip genenation for the Movic TheaIer (100,000 square feet) is based on IlIIW)'S oonducled during 1u1y 1998 and is based on 22 __
Saurr:c: lTE Trip a-ratUIII Report. StxIh Edition, 1997
GUztting Jad=n Km:Iru Anglin Lopn RiMha1t. Inc.
I .
,)
" I
Page 16
Table 3-6
SUMMARY OF PM PEAK-HOUR INTERNAL CAPTURE, YEAR 2005
Oviedo Marketplace
Regional
Shopping Movie Medical
From/fo Center Theater Office Hosoital Office Retail Restaurant Total
Re2ional Shoppin2 Center 0 22 0 16 8 14 60 120
Movie Theater 22 0 0 0 0 20 20 62
Office 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hospital 16 0 0 0 40 2 14 72
Medical Office 8 0 0 40 0 , 4 10 62
Retail 14 20 0 2 4 0 14 54
Restaurant 60 20 0 14 10 14 0 118
Total 120 62 0 72 62 54 118 488
Source: Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehar~ Inc.
.
.
.
t!:ll
.
\'
'-'~"
..-
.
.
Page 17
3.3 Pass-By Trame
Pass-by trips come directly from the traffic stream passing the facility on the adjacent street system and
do not require a diversion from another roadway. Pass-by trips were esrim~ted for retail and
restaurant land uses based on information contained in the ITE Trip Generation Report, Sixth Edition.
The estim:.lted trips for the regional shopping center, hospital complex and general office space will be
considered primary trips and therefore, part of the background traffic volume for the purpose of
calculating pass-by trips. Pass-by trips are estimated at 458 during the afternoon peak-hour. This
represents 19.6% of the retail/restaurant trip generation, less internal capture. The estimated pass-by
trips (458) represent 8.3% of the background traffic (including the regional shopping center, hospital
complex and general office space) on Red Bug Lake Road and SR426. A summary of estimated pass-
by trips by land use is presented in Table 3-7.
3.4 Mode Split
LYNX route #47 currently serves the Oviedo Marketplace and it is projected that at build out transit
operations will be adequate to attract 200 peak-hour riders. Based on an average auto occupancy of
2.0, a reduction in vehicle trip generation of 100 peak-hour vehicles will be assumed for transit use in
this analysis.
3.5 Distribution
The distribution of external PM peak-hour trip ends is based on surveys conducted at the site over a
three-day period. Projected distribution of project traffic is shown on Figure 3-2. A copy of the
survey questionnaire is included in the Appendix.
Traffic Impact Study
Oviedo Marketplace
August 20,1999
\
,,: I
Ii'
Page 18
Table 3-7
SUMMARY OF PASS-BY ESTIMATES, YEAR 2005
Oviedo Marketplace
Daily Daily PM PH PM PH
Land Use Parcel Intensity Pass-By % Trip Ends Pass-By Trip Ends Pass-By
Target with Garden Center 21B 128,634 SF 15% 6,962 1,044 401 60
Convenience Market 20 2,720 SF 45% 2,300 1,035 170 77
Chilis 21A 5,683 SF 20% 741 148 68 14
Retail 23 12,205 SF 15% 1,763 264 157 24
Steak-n-Shake 24 3,508 SF 20% 457 91 I 51 10
Fazolis 25 3,206 SF 20% 418 84 35 7
HiJdt Turnover Restaurant 28 7,700 SF 20% 1,007 201 83 17
Retail 30 7,000 SF 15% 912 137 119 18
Retail 31 15,000 SF 15% 2,013 302 180 27
Retail 32 6,700 SF 15% 603 90 50 8
Total 17,176 3,398 1,314 304
Retail 16 30,000 SF 15% 3,143 471 284 43
Retail 17 10,000 SF 15% 1,551 233 137 21
Retail 35 13,500 SF 15% 1,881 282 167 25
High Turnover Restaurant 35 7,000 SF 20% 912 182 76 15
High Turnover Restaurant 35 5,600 SF 20% 730 146 61 12
HiJdt Turnover Restaurant 35 3,200 SF 20% 417 83 35 7
Quality Restaurant 35 7,000 SF 20% 630 126 52 10
Qualitv Restaurant 35 6,400 SF 20% 576 115 48 10
Quality Restaurant 35 7,300 SF 20% 657 131 55 11
Total 10,497 1,771 915 154
Total Pass-By 5.168 2.229 458
Source: Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
ITE Trip Generation Report, Fifth Edition. 1991
Seminole County Road Impact Fees 1990 Update
.
.
.
.
I
, ,
I
.
',\
I
.
!j.
Page '9
"
7.'%
HitcheD Hammock Rd.
~
..;
-
~~
2.8%
Chapman Rd.
'#.~
G....
=~
~
I
SEMIN2hB COUNTY
ORANGBCOUNTY
G.!!!
~
~
Rgure 3.2
Project Tralllc Distribution
~I ::::.T~:O
..ac....
A..OLIM
~~:::m Oviedo Marketplace
m Sale In HOes
r"""l- I
Nor1h 0 2.S 5 10
~,
Page 20
4.0 EVALUATION
The Year 2005 Orlando Urban Area Transportation Study model set, approved by the East Central Florida .
Regional Planning Council (ECFRPC), was used to produce system traffic forecasts.
4.1 Roadways
In cases where Year 2005 background traffic was projected to be lower than existing volumes,
background traffic was increased using historic growth rates, adjusted if necessary, to obtain Year
2005 background traffic. Table A-3, Appendix, presents the projected annual growth rate for each
roadway segment. Project traffic was assigned to the roadway network using the distribution reported
in Section 3.5 and added to the background volumes to obtain total traffic for Year 2005. The "K"
and "D" factors were then applied to the AADT volumes to calculate directional volumes for the
afternoon peak-hour for each roadway segment. The evaluation of roadway segments is based on the
service volumes shown in Table A-I, Appendix.
Figure 4-1 presents total PM peak-hour directional traffic for Year 2005, including the projected
traffic from the proposed Oviedo Marketplace development program. Table 4-1 summarizes the
roadway level of service for Year 2005 and presents the number of lanes, facility type, service volume
at the acceptable standard, and significance of the Oviedo Marketplace traffic.
4.4 IntersectionslRamps
Intersections were analyzed by applying the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) operational analysis
procedures for the afternoon peak-hour conditions. Programmed improvements to intersections,
resulting from road widenings, are shown on Figures A-I through A-IO, Appendix. Ramps were
analyzed for the afternoon peak-hour following the HCM procedures outlined in Chapter 5. Ramp
service volumes are included in the Appendix. Table 4-2 summarizes the intersection/ramp level of
service for Year 2005, including the projected traffic from the proposed Oviedo Marketplace
development program. Significance of project traffic was determined following the procedures
outlined in the ECFRPC staff methodology (Appendix). Computer printouts of the intersection
analyses are included in the Appendix. They are also available on computer disks upon request.
.
Traffic Impact Study
Oviedo Mari(etplace
August 20,1999
.
.
I>
r '
.
.
: \
. 1
rage L;
~~f~
. ~*
,...
-
C1D-
~: ~i
......
.....
-..
~
I
LEGEND
1188 - Total PM Peak Hour
Directional Traffic
(2'''> - Project PM Peak Hour
Directional Trafllc
SEMINl>~ COUNTY
ORANCJECOUNTY
Rgure ....1
PM Peak Hour Directional Tralllc · 'ear 2005
r. .un...
L. _l~Eff::. Oviedo Marketplace
m Scale In HUes
r- I
NordI 0 2.5 5 10
:\
p.
Page 22
Table 4-1
SUMMARY OF PM PEAK.1I0UR LEVEL OF SERVICE AND SIGNIFICANCE, YEAR %005
ROADWAY SEGMENTS
OvIedo MorIufplace
OvIedo Marketplace
SenIce TrlDl" M a ~ or
Lamsl Accept- Vollme PM Peak-llour DirectIonal Vollftle Ace, LOS
SCIJ1lenl Responsible radiI)' able Accept LOS Teal TriM OvIedo Market lace "TrlDl" Total Servlce SIg.1
Roadwav From . To A~......, TVDe LOS - /P1I/I'D1 NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB LOS Trlna Volm>e Shr, Ad., AcIv,
SemOlllll Boulevard ISR44361 SR50 . Univenltv Blvd. FOOT 6 ART 0 2780 2435 2142 35 40 C 1.43" 1.25 " NO NO NO
Unlvenltv Blvd. - A10ma Ave. FOOT 6 ART 0 2780 2,737 2S82 70 80 0 B4" 2.SO" NO NO NO
A10ma Ave. - Howell Branch Rd. FOOT 6 ART 0 2780 2580 2363 87 100 C 3.37" 3.13" NO NO NO
Howell Branch Rd. . LakemOllt Ave. FOOT 6 ART 0 2780 3,059 2327 104 120 P 3.41" 3.75" NO YES NO
LakemOllt Ave. - Red BUll Lake Rd. FOOT 6 ART 0 2780 5318 4045 116 134 P 2.19" 4.19" NO YES NO
Red BUll Lake Rd. - US 17.92 FOOT 6 ART 0 2780 4709 3581 120 104 F 2054" 4.30" NO YES NO
US 17-92 . CR 427 FOOT 6 ART 0 2780 3595 2734 100 87 P 2.77" 3.59" NO YES NO
Goldenrod Road (SR 5Sll SR SO - UDivenltv Blvd. FOOT 4 ART E 1m 1.784 1835 -35 40 0 2.17" 2.16" NO NO NO
Univenltv Blvd. - A10ma Ave. FOOT 4 ART B 2200 1727 1.288 70 80 B -4.03" 3.16" NO NO NO
Oodd Rood Howell Branch Rd. - Olke Rd. Seminole 4COL B 2200 883 6n 87 100 B 9.84" 3.95" NO NO NO
Olke Rd. - Red BUll Lake Rd. Seminole 4COL B 2200 862 655 87 100 B 10.09" 3.95" NO NO NO
Tuskawllla Road A10ma Ave. - Olke Rd. Seminole 4 ART B 2200 1,485 1130 209 239 0 14.05" 9.48" YES NO NO
Olke Rd. . Red BIIII Lake Rd. Seminole 6 ART B 3300 1229 1615 278 319 C 19.74" 9.67 " YES NO NO
Red BUll Lake Rd. . Lake Or. Seminole 4 ART B 2200 1,547 1,177 319 278 0 20.62" 14.SO" YES NO NO
Lake Or. - Winter SDrIDR. Blvd. Seminole 4 ART B 2200 1357 1784 239 209 B 11.69" 9.48" YES NO NO
W'mter SDrIDR. Blvd. . SR 434 Seminole 4 ART B 2200 8S5 1,124 80 70 C 6.18" 3.16" NO NO NO
OreeneWav SR SO - UDivenltv Blvd. TumDiko 4F 0 3270 2-'-72 1,728 243 279 C 10.71" 7.44" YES NO NO
UDivcnltv Blvd. - A10ma Ave. TumDlke 4P 0 3270 1881 1431 36S 419 C 19.41 " 11.16" YES NO NO
A10ma Ave. . Red BUll Lake Rd. TumDlke 4F 0 3270 I,SOB 1,147 382 439 B 25.36" 11.70" YES NO NO
Red BUll Lake Rd. - SR 434 Turilnlke 4F 0 3270 1643 1.'-SO 259 226 B 15.77" 7.93" YES NO NO
SR 434 - Lake Marv Blvd. Tumniko 4F 0 3270 1m 1351 239 209 C 13.46" 7.32" YES NO NO
DeaD Rood SR SO - Unlvenltv Blvd. O...noe 4 ART B 1850 1112 1462 104 120 C 8.18" 6.47 " YES NO NO
Univenltv Blvd. - MeCIIlloch Rd. Oraue 2 ART B 1710 982 747 174 199 0 17.71 " 10.17" YES NO NO
MeCIIIloch Rd. - A10ma Avenue Seminole 2 ART B 1000 952 724 174 199 B 18.26" 17.38 " YES NO NO
Rouae Rd. SR SO - Univenltv Blvd. OnlIIlre 2COL B 830 - 1,236 1131 0 0 P 0.00" 0.00" NO YES NO
SR 434 SR SO - Unlvenltv Blvd. FOOT 6 ART B 2780 2612 2063 209 239 C 7.99" 7.SO" YES NO NO
UnlvenllY Blvd. . Col'DOlalC Blvd. FOOT 6 ART B 2780 2694 1,403 330 379 0 12.26" 1l.88~ YES NO NO
COI1IOIlIle Blvd. . MeCIIlloch Rd. FOOT 6 ART B 2780 2755 1435 330 379 0 11.99" 11.88" YES NO NO
McCulloch Rd. - CbaDman Rd. FOOT 6 ART E 3100 P72 1,728 S04 578 C 22.19" 16.26" YES NO NO
CbaIlman Rd. . A1afava Woods Blvd. FOOT 6 ART B 3100 1546 1176 5S6 638 B 35.99" 17.94" YES NO NO
A1afava Woods Blvd. - Mitchell Hammock Rd. FOOT 6 ART B 3100 1.960 1491 591 678 C 30.15" 19.07" YES NO NO
Mitchell Hommoc:k Rd. . A10ma Avo. FOOT 2 ART 0 880 755 993 0 0 P 0.00" 0.00" NO YES NO
A10ma Avo. . OreeneWav FOOT 2 ART 0 880 769 1011 20 17 F 1.72" 1.98" NO YES NO
OreeneWay - Tuakawllla Rd. FOOT 4 ART 0 1850 975 1282 40 35 C 2.71 " 1.88" NO NO NO
Tuakawllla Rd. . SR 419 FOOT 4 ART B 2480 2138 1,626 80 70 B 3.73" 3.22" NO NO NO
SR 419 - US 17-92 FOOT 4 ART B 2480 1795 1366 44 39 0 2.47" 1.79" NO NO NO
US 17.92 - CR 427 FOOT 4 ART B 2480 1.999 1520 13 11 0 0.65" 0.52 " NO NO NO
Lockwood Road MeCIIlloch Rd. . Seminole Creek Or. Seminole 4 ART B 1m 907 690 87 100 B 9.59" 4.70" NO NO NO
Seminole Creek Or. . Unlc BcllII RIver Seminole 4 ART B 1850 907 690 191 219 B 21.08" 10.34 " YES NO NO
Unle BcllII River - Mllchell Hommock Rd. Seminole 4 ART B 1m 725 551 191 219 B 26.37 " 10.34 " YES NO NO
MltcheU Hommock Rd. . SR 419 OvIedo 4 ART B 1m 1321 l00s 60 52 C 4.53" 3.23" NO NO NO
SR419-CR426 OvIedo 2 ART B 1710 252 191 20 17 A 7.92" 1.1791> NO NO NO
McCulloch Road SR 434 - LocIcwood Rd. Seminole 4 ART 0 2200 799 608 40 35 B 4.99" 1.81" NO NO NO
Unlvenltv Boulevard SR 436 . Ooldcnrod Rd. O......e - 6 ART B 2780 4630 3080 35 40 P 0.75" 1.25" NO YES NO
Ooldcnrod Rd. - Ecoil Tr. Omn.e 6 ART B 2780 3725 2 SOl 52 60 P 1.40" 1.88" NO YES NO
BcllII Tr. - OreeneWav Oraue 6 ART B 2780 3,725 2,S01 52 60 F 1.40" 1.88" NO YES NO
OreeneWav . Dean Rd. OraDlle 6 ART B 2780 4416 3 li07 120 104 F 2.71 " 4.30" NO YES NO
Dean Rd. - Rouso Rd. OraDlle 6 ART B 2780 3,960 4,038 100 87 F 2.15" 3.1391> NO YES NO
Rouse Rd. . AlaraVll Tr. O......e 6 ART B 2780 1971 2739 80 70 0 2.54 " 2.SO<<' NO NO NO
"'Cle: fatUity typc 11II service vo....... aIC buod Olllhe loea1lavemmenl tGqlrehens\ve plan or Ihe jurlsdlctlOll bt w!lIch Ihe IOlIdwIY I<C'ftOIII b IotIl,d
. Aceepllblo level of service II buod mlhe tGqlrehenslvc pIau or Ihe 00IIIly In wbIch Ihe IOlIdway I'IlftmI b \oeated
AoeepCIble level of.ervIce 11II service volumes ror Ihe PUIS b tllIbUahed by Ihe mOT
RtlpclIlIlble lIency IlIhe lIency lIIat ... malnl_ rapcllllllblllty ror Ihe lOlIdway
Sowu: ClirIl6rJ J.dI... KndwrM,U.'-_", 6tc.
.
'.
.
.
Tab.unUed)
~
1
pq.
~
SUMMARY OF PM PEAK-HOUR LllVllL OF SllRVlCE AND SIGNInCANCR, YEAR 1005
ROADWAY SllGMllNfS
OvIedo Marketplace
OVIedo Marketplac.
Service TrIDs" As a '" of
Lon..1 A...pt- VoIum. PM Peak.Hour Dlr.ctlonal VoIum. Acc. LOS
~'nl Rllpon.lbl. ~1 abl. A:,:~~S Talal rrflD. OvIedo Market lace "TrIDS" Talal Servlc. SIC.I
Roo"-w .To ..--n.... In<! fimlilR SRIWR NRIllB S8/WR I.OS Trio. VoIum. I...... "dv. dv.
Aloma Ave. (SR 426) US 11.92. lAkClllOll1 Ave. FDOT 4 ART B 1850 2,395 1,139 S2 60 F 2.18" 2.8a NO YES NO
lAkcmonl Ave. . SR 436 FDOT 4 ART B 1850 2,39S 1,139 52 60 F 2.18" 2.82 " NO YES NO
SR 436 . Ooldmrocl Rd. mOT 4 ART B 1850 2,028 1,6llO 10 80 F 3.43" 3.16" NO YES NO
Ooldmrocl Rd. . Howell Onncb Rd. FDOT 4 ART B IlISO 1,612 1,211 174 199 C 10.18" 9.40" YES NO NO
Howc11 Onncb Rd. . 1\ukawiUa Rd. FDOT 4 ART B 2480 1,810 1,376 114 199 0 9.61 " 1.01" YES NO NO
1\ukawiUa Rd. .o......W.v FDOT 4 ART B 24lKl 132S 1142 3S 40 D 2.29" 1.61 " NO NO NO
a......wow . Dean Rd. FDOT 4 ART B 24lKl 1.628 1,238 35 40 C 2.14" 1.40 " NO NO NO
Dean Rd. . CIuInmon Rd. FDOT 4 ART B 2480 1,440 I,09S 243 279 C 16.90" 9.81" YES NO NO
CIwmm Rd. . SlavIa Rd. mOT 4 ART B 24lKl 1,621 1,233 348 399 C 21.44" 14.02" YES NO NO
SlavIa Rd. . Mltcbell HIlIIIIlOdI: Rd. FDOT 4 ART B 24lKl 1,324 1,001 376 412 C 28.41" 1S.16" YES NO NO
MltcbeU HIIIIIIIOCt Rd. . Ov\odc MutdplJce 8M FDOT 4 ART D Il1SO 1,8.U 1,348 1111 118 O. 42.49" 42.'" " YES NO NO
OvIedo Mut-lace BM\. . Winter SurIDu B(v(J. FDOT 4 ART D Il1SO 1650 va~ S44 \ 496 0' 32.98" 29.41 " YES NO NO
W. BmodwavSl. SR4261 WImer SurIDu O(v(J. . Late JCISIIIl Dr. mOT 2 ART D 880 I,ISS 897 299 261 O. 25.88" 33.98" YES NO NO
LatcJCSSIID Dr. . SR 434 FDOT 2 ART D 880 1SI 613 1S9 139 C. 21.24" 18.12" YES NO NO
GeuevI Dr. (CR 426l CR 419 . LockwoccI Rd. Seminole 2COL B 1000 464 353 100 Il1 A 21.46" 9.97" \'US NO NO
Loctwocd Rd. . Seminole Woods 8M\. SemInole 2COL D 1000 604 4S9 80 10 0 13.20" 1.97" YES NO NO
Horatio A...... US 11.92 .1bIst1e 1A Onrw.e 4 ART D IlISO 2,215 1,327 35 40 F 1.57" 1.88" NO YES NO
Howc11 8rmcll TblaUe 1A . Late Howell Rd. SemInole 4 ART 0 1850 1,712 1302 3S 40 C 2.03" 1.88" NO NO NO
lAke Howell Rd. - SR 436 Seminole 4 ART 0 1850 1.964 1,494 3' 40 P 1.17" 1.88" NO YES NO
SR 436 . Dite Rd. Seminole 4 ART 0+20" 2220 1,532 1,16-' 35 40 C 2.27" 1.57" NO NO NO
Dite Rd. . Dodd Rd. SemInole 4 ART D+20" 2220 892 679 35 40 0 3.90" 1.57" NO NO NO
Dodd Rd. . A1cmI Ave. Seminole 4 ART 0+20" 2220 1,084 824 3' 40 0 3.21 " 1.57" NO NO NO
Dite R<*I Howell Onncb Rd. . Dodd Rd SemInole 2 ART B 1000 320 395 3S 40 0 6.69" 3.48" NO NO NO
Dodd Rd. - 1\ukowl11a Rd. SemInole 2 ART B 1000 366 481 3S 40 A 8.29" 3.99" NO NO NO
SlavIa Rc.s RodliUiLate Rd. - A1cmI Ave. Seminole 2 ART B 1000 108 S38 60 52 B 8.45" S.98" YES NO NO
Rod Bua lAke R<*I SR 436 . WlIIIer Put Rd. SemInole 6 ART B 3300 3,272 2,489 218 319 B 8.50" 8.43 " YES NO NO
WInIer Put Rd. . Eole ein:le SemInole 6 ART B 3300 3.292 2,S04 382 439 B 11.62" 1t.S9" YES NO NO
IEole eln:Je. Neddlm Piooa Way SemInole 4 ART B 2200 2,573 1,957 4S2 S18 C' 11.36" 20.54" YES NO NO
Neddlill Pineo WiY. Dodd Rd. SemInole 4 ART B 2200 3.137 2,386 539 618 C' 11.18" 24.49" YES NO NO
Dodd Rd. . lUstawl11a Rd. SemInole 4 ART B 2200 3369 2 S63 625 111 C. 18."" 28.41 " YES NO NO
1lIakawiUa Rd. . SUo Dr. SemInole 6 ART B 3300 2,810 2,137 1.234 1.41S B 43.92" 37.40" YES NO NO
SUo Dr. . ellNl Rd. SemInole 6 ART B 3300 2,932 2,230 1,252 1,43S B 42.68" 37.93" YES NO NO
ClINS Rd. . SlavIa Rd. SemInole 6 ART B 3300 2.898 2,204 1.304 1,49S B 44.99" 39.51" YES NO NO
S1avla Rd. . Sile EnlnDce (1<AIlb) SemInole 6 ART B 3300 2,883 2,193 1.321 I,SIS B 4S.82 " 40.03" YES NO NO
Slle EuInnce (."'IIb) . 00verI Rd. SemInole 6 ART E 3300 2,164 2,102 1,275 1,449 E 46.12" 38.64" YES NO NO
Dov<n Rd. . Ovlalo MuteIDlaco OM\. SemInole 6 ART B 3300 2,190 1666 1249 1,114 D $1.02" 37.85" YES NO NO
Oviodo Mut"",Ia.. OM\. . Tuaell!olnnr:o SemInole 6 ART B 3300 2,240 1,104 1,404 1,124 D 62.66 " 42.55" YES NO NO
Tame! EIllnnce . a_Way SemInole 6 ART B 3300 2,436 1,868 1,487 1,188 D 60.36" 45.06" YES NO NO
a......wav. Aloma Ave. SemInole 6 ART B 3300 3,196 _ 2,431 1,136 973 B 35."''' 34.42 " YES NO NO
Mllcbell H_ Rc.s AIoma Ave.. SR434 OvIedo 4 ART B 1850 2,278 I,S31 1,011 887 C. 44.63" "'.9S" YES NO NO
SR 434 . LockwoccI Rd. Ovlodo 4 ART B IlISO 1,681 1,130 339 296 C 20.16" 18.32" YES NO NO
CbmnaIl Rd. SR 426 . SR 434 SemInole 4COL D IlISO 953 124 120 104 0 12.36" 6.47" YES NO -NO
Semlmla Bollevald US 11.92 . lAke Dr. Semlmle 4COL B 2200 1,066 811 104 120 C 9.18" 4.74" NO NO NO
Late Drive Semlmla O(v(J' . lUst.wiUa Rd. SemInole 4COL B 2200 910 692 139 1S9 0 1S.28" 6.32 " YES NO NO
CR419 SR434 - Loctwood Rd. Seminole 2COL B 1000 839 638 20 11 B 2.38" 1.99" NO NO NO
Lockwood Rd. . Sec<nI 51. SemlnoIe 4COL B IlISO 1,123 8S4 60 52 0 5.33" 3.23" NO NO NO
WhuI SoImu BolIeYud SR426. NOIlhem W.v IWInlcr Snrlrw. 4COL D 1640 617 812 226 259 C 31.93" lS.lKl" YES NO NO
Nonhem W.v . Nonhem W.v IWInter Scrim, 2COL D 760 414 S44 174 199 0 36.6S" 26.23" YES NO NO
Nonhem W.w - 1\uUwil1a Rd. lWIIIIer SDrInal 2COL 0 760 609 463 14 85 D 12.22 " 9.79" YES NO NO
Nonhem W.y bill W1nIer _. O(v(J.. WInIer _ OM!. lWIoter SorIm, 2COL D 760 437 333 122 140 C 27.82" 16.01" YES NO NO
If*' PaclIIly"""IIII____Clllo__ ~....orllloptdrOlCllIo_lIlo._,._bl-
Aa:qllabIo_or_b_CIllllo~""ortlJo_lo_tlJo.-., _b_...s
Aa:qllabIo_or_IId__1br tlJo PlIISb__byllloHlOT
RapcalllIe......,. btlJo......,.dac...._RIpCIlIlblIlty CortlJor-.,
t.l - _0llIIlq LOS
. . tued CD ART.PlAN
SDIII<f: G/IIttIIfI/_I'.-A.,u.1.4>n _.r..
..
PlIge24
Table 4-2
SUMMARY OF PM PEAK-HOUR INTERSEC110N
LEVEL OF SERVICE, YEAR 2005
OvIedo Markdplaa
.
.-
- Oviedo
No. Intenectioa Accept. Marblplaa Sig.&
No. Loadion Pbaea ConlJ'ol LOS LOS SI_Ifl';"'ce Si2. AllY. AllY.
INTERSECTIONS
1 Red Bug Lake Road SR436 3 S~ D F 25.8"/0 YES YES YES
2 Red Bug Lake Road Dodd Road 4 SimIaJ E D N/A NO NO NO
3 Red Bua Lake Road TuskawillaRoad 4 Silllllll E E 0.0''/0 NO NO NO
4 Red Bug Lake Road Sun Drive 4 Signal E D N/A NO NO NO
5 Red Bug Lake Road Ci1rus Road 4 Signal E D N/A NO NO NO
6 Red Bug Lake Road S1avia Road 2 Silllllll E B N/A NO NO NO
7 Red Bug Lake Road Dovcra Road 5 Silllllll E D N/A NO NO NO
8 Red Bug Lake Road Oviedo Mamlplace Blvd 4 Signal E D N/A NO NO NO
9 Red Bug Lake Road GreeneWav ramps west 2 Silllllll D A N/A NO NO NO
10 Red Bug Lake Road GreeneWay I'lIIIIIlS east 3 Silllllll D B N/A NO NO NO
II Red BUR Lake Road SR426 4 Silllllll E D N/A NO NO NO
12 Mitchell Hammock Road I'i:il LocItwood Boulevard 4 SIgnal E D N/A NO YES NO
13 Tuskawilla Road (ill Dike Road 3 SimIaJ E B N/A NO NO NO
14 Tuskawilla Road I'i:il Lake Drive 3 SUznaI E B N/A NO NO NO
15 Tuskawilla Road (iil Winter SPfinR:s Boulevard 4 Signal D C N/A NO NO NO
16 SR434 Chapman Road 4 Signal E C N/A NO NO NO
17 SR434 I Alafaya Woods Boulevard 3 SiJl1laI E c N/A NO NO NO
18 SR434 Mitchell HammocIc Road 4 Signal D D N/A NO NO NO
19 SR434 SR426 4 SilUt D F 23.9% YES YES YES
20 SR434 GreeneWay fllm1)S east 2 Sim D B N/A NO NO NO
21 SR434 GreeneWay nmms west 2 Si.... D A N/A NO NO NO
22 SR434 Tuskawilla Road 4 Si.... D C N/A NO NO NO
23 SR434 SR419 3 Signal D D NlA NO NO NO
24 SR426 Tuskawilla Road 3 Signal E B N/A NO NO NO
25 SR426 GreeneWav nmms west 3 SUznaI D B N/A NO NO NO
26 SR426 GreeneWay fllm1)S east 3 Signal D C N/A NO NO NO
27 SR426 Dean Road 3 SiRna! E c N/A NO NO NO
28 SR426 Road 3 siRnal E c NlA NO NO NO
29 SR426 Oviedo MmlcdPlace Boulevard 3 SImiiif D B N/A NO NO NO
30 SR426 Winter S~ Boulevard 3 Signal D C N/A NO NO NO
3\ SR426 Lake JCSSUIl Avenue 3 Sismal D C N/A -NO NO NO
32 Lockwood Boulevard (Qj CR.4\9 4 Sismal D, C NlA NO NO NO
I'ak-I:I UJ" Volume OViedO
Ser. Vol Accept. MartrdpIace S1g.&
Location 1'i:ilStd. Total Prolect LOS LOS Sm.lficance 512. AcIv. Am.
RAMPS
1 Red Bug Lalce Rd 10 SR417 NB 1600 578 244 D A 15.3% YES NO NO
2 RedBuaLakeRdIO SR417 SB \600 678 412 D B 25.8"/0 YES NO NO
3 SR417 SB 10 Red Bug Lake Road 1600 405 222 D A \3.9% YES NO NO
4 SR4\7 NB 10 Red Bug Lake Road 1600 1079 372 D C 23.3% YES NO NO
5 SR417NB 10 SR434 1600 510 19 D A 1.2"/0 NO NO NO
6 SR43410 SR4\7 SB . 1600 273 16 D A 1.0% NO NO NO
7 SR426IOSR4\7NB 1600 351 48 D A 3.0% NO NO NO
8 SR417 SBIO SR426 1600 4\7 52 D A 3.3% NO NO NO
.
Smm:e:
GliItting Jtu:Iatm Km:hu Aligli11 LDpe: Rbwhart. /N:.
.
-
.
"'"
.
.
Page 25
5.0 PROJECTED IMPROVEMENT NEEDS
Needed improvements in Year 2005 ar~ shown in Table 5-1 (Roadway Segments) and Table 5-2
(IntersectionslRamps). Also shown are the projected LOS, improved LOS, and significance of trips
with one end in the Oviedo Marketplace DR!.
Based on the adequate facilities provisions of the adopted ECFRPC staff guideline, the Transportation
Uniform Standard Rule (9J-2.045), and the Oviedo Marketplace Development Order, projected
significant and adverse impacts must be mitigated, In cases where the above are in conflict, the
Development Order takes precedence. According to the above, the Oviedo Marketplace DRI traffic
impacts are considered significant and adverse on those roadway segment where:
-
· Trips with one end in the Oviedo Marketplace DR! are projected to equal or exceed five
percent (5%) of the adopted level service volume; and
· The projected level of service is below the LOS "D" service volume established in the
comprehensive plan of the jurisdiction in which the roadway is located.
This evaluation projected significant and adverse impacts on the following roadway segments,
intersections and ramps in Year 2005:
Roadway Segments:
None
Intersections :
Red Bug Lake Road @ SR436
SR426 @ SR434
Ramps:
None
Traffic Impact Study
Oviedo Marketplace
August 20, 1999
Page 26
Tallie 5-1
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT NEEDS, YEAR 2005
ROADWAY SEGMENTS
Oriedo M8rketplace
~
Oviedo
Segment Projected Improved M8rketplace 8q:J
Roadway From - To LOS Imnrowment LOS Silmlflcance S~. Adv. Adv.
Scmoran Boulevard (SR 436 SR.50 - University Blvd. C NOlIe N1A 1.27"/0 NO NO NO
Uuivenity Blvd. - Alamo Ave. D NOIIC N1A 2S3% NO NO NO
Alama Ave. - HOWI:ll Braneh Rd. C NOlIe N1A 3.17% NO NO NO
HOWI:ll Braneh Rd. - Lakcmont Ave. F Create 8-lane ~ity C 3.80% NO YES NO
LakcmODt Ave. - Red Bwr Lake Rd. F Create 12-1_ canacitv D 4.25% NO YES NO
Red Bwr Lake Rd. - US 17-92 F Create 12-1aac ~ty C 4.3S% NO YES NO
US 17.92 . CR 427 F Cn:aIc 10-1aac ~ty B 3.63% NO YES NO
Goldcmod Road (SR SSI) SR SO - Univcnitv Blvd. D Nouc N/A 218% NO NO NO
Universitv Blvd. - Alamo Ave. E NODe N1A 3.20% NO NO NO
Dodd Road HOWI:ll Braneh Rd. - Dike Rd. B NODe N1A 4.00% NO NO NO
Dike Rd. . Red BUR Lake Rd. B NOIIC N1A 4.00% NO NO NO
Tuskawilla Road Alama Ave. . Dike Rd. D None N1A 9.61% YES NO NO
Dike Rd. - Red BUll Lake Rd. C NOIIC N1A 9.78% YES NO NO
Red BUR Lake Rd. - Lake Dr. D None N/A 14.67% YES NO NO
Lake Dr. - Wmtcr SDrinlZS Blvd. E Nouc N1A 9.61% YES NO NO
Wmtcr Sorml!S Blvd. . SR 434 C NOIIC N/A 3.20% NO NO NO
Grcc:DcWav SR SO - Universitv Blvd. C NOIIC N1A 7.S4% YES NO NO
University Blvd. - Alamo Ave. -c NOIIC N1A 11.31% YES NO NO
Alama Ave. - Red BUll Lake Rd. B Nolle N1A I1.8S% YES NO NO
Red BUll Lake Rd. - SR 434 B NOIIC N/A 8.02% YES NO NO
SR 434 - Lake Marv Blvd. C NOIIC N1A 7.40% YES NO NO
Dean Road SR SO - University Blvd. C NOIIC N1A 6.S4% YES NO NO
Universitv Blvd. - MeCu110eh Rd. D NOIIC N1A 10.30% YES NO NO
McCulloch Rd. - Alamo AVCIlUC E NOIIC N1A 17.62% YES NO NO
Rouse Rd. SR SO - Univcnitv Blvd. F Widen to four 1_ D 0.00% NO YES NO
SR 434 SR SO . University Blvd. C NOIIC N1A 7.60% YES NO NO
Uuivenity Blvd. - Blvd. D NODe N1A 1204% YES NO NO
Blvd. - MeCulloeh Rd. D NOIIC N1A 1204% YES NO NO
McCulloeh Rd. - CbaDman Rd. C NOIIC N1A 16.48% YES NO NO
Rd. . Alafava Woods Blvd. B NOIIC N1A 18.19% YES NO NO
Alafaya Woods Blvd. - Mitchell Hammoek Rd. C NOIIC N1A 19.32% YES NO NO
Mitchell Hammock Rd. . Alamo Ave. F Widen to four laDes B 0.00% NO YES NO
Alama Ave. . Gn:eueWav F Widen to four laDes B 200% NO YES NO
GrccneWav - Tuskawilla Rd. C None N/A 1.90% NO NO NO
Tuskawilla Rd. - SR 419 E NODe N/A 3.25% NO NO NO
SR419 - US 17-92 D NODe N1A 1.81 % NO NO NO
US 17-92 - CR 427 D NODe N1A 0.S3% NO NO NO
Loc:kwood Road McCulloeh Rd. - Seminole Creek Dr. B Nolle N1A 4.76% NO NO NO
Seminole Creek Dr. - Little Eeon River B Nolle N1A 10.47% YES NO NO
Little Eeon River - Mitchell Hammoc:k Rd. B Nolle N/A 10.47% YES NO NO
Mitehcll Hammock Rd. - SR 419 C Nolle N/A 3.27% NO NO NO
SR 419 - CR 426 A Nolle N1A 1.18% NO NO NO
MeCul1oc:h Road SR 434 - Loc:kwood Rd. B NODe N1A 1.83% NO NO NO
University Boulevard SR 436 - Goldcmod Rd. F Create 10-1aDc canacitv D 1.27"/0 NO YES NO
Goldcmod Rd. - Eeon Tr. F Cn:aIc 10-1aDc ~i V C 1.90% NO YES NO
Econ Tr. - GrccneWav F Create 10-1aDc ~i y C 1.90% NO YES NO
GrccneWav - Dean Rd. F Create 10-1aDc ~ v D 4.3S% NO YES NO
Dean Rd. - Rouse Rd. F CraIe 10-1aac ~i y D 3.17"/0 NO YES NO
Rouse Rd. . Alm"" Tr. D NOlIe D 2S3% NO NO NO
.
.
SorIrw: GUmingJ""-o K.m- AlrglbtLopc ~ It.t:.
.
-
Page 27
Table 5-1 (CoodDaed)
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT NEEDS, YEAR 2005
ROADWAY SEGMENTS
Oviedo MarUtplaee
.....
Oviedo
SepIeDt Projected Improved MarUtplace SlgJ
Roadwav From - To LOS ImDrovm'Irnt LOS Sinlfieance SIl!. Adv , Adv.
Aloma Ave. (SR 426) Dean Rd. - Chanman Rd. F Widen to six lancs C 2.86% NO YES NO
Lakemont Ave. . SR 436 F Widen to six lucs C 2.86% NO YES NO
SR 436 . Goldcurod Rd. F Widen to aix lucs C 3.81% NO YES NO
Goldcurod Rei - Howell Bl'llllch Rd. C Nonc NlA 9.52% YES NO NO
Howell Bl'llllch Rd. . Tuskawilla Rei 0 None NlA 7.10% YES NO NO
Tuskawi11a Rd. - GrecocWay 0 Nonc NlA 1.63% NO NO NO
GreeneWay - Dean Rd. C None N/A 1.42"A. NO NO NO
Dean Rei . Rd. C None N/A 9.94% YES NO NO
I \..WIjJIDBII Rei - Slam Rd. C None NlA 14.21% YES NO NO
Slavia Rd. . Mitchell Hammock Rd. C None N/A 15.16% YES NO NO
Mitchell Hammock Rd. - Ovicclo Marketplace Blv B* None N/A 42.54% YES NO NO
Ovicclo Marketplace Blvd. - Wmter SDrin2ll Blvd. B* Nonc NlA 29.41% YES NO NO
W. Broadway Sl (SR 426) Wmter SDrin2ll Blvd. . Lake Jesaup Dr. B* None N/A 34.38"A. YES NO NO
Lake JCSSIq) Dr. - SR 434 C* Nonc N/A 18.33% YES NO NO
Geneva Dr. (CR 426) CR 419 - Lockwood Rei A None N/A 10.08% YES NO NO
Lockwood Rd. - Seminole Woods Blvd. 0 None NlA 8.07% YES NO NO
Horatio AVCDue US 17-92 - Thistle LA F Widen to six lucs C 1.90% NO YES NO
Howell Braoch This1Ie Ln. - Lake Howell Rei C None NlA 1.90% NO NO NO
Lake Howell Rei - SR 436 F Widen to aix 1_ C 1.90% NO YES NO
SR 436 . Dike Rd. C None NlA 1.S9% NO NO NO
DiIcc Rei . Dodd Rd. B None NlA 1.S9% NO NO NO
Dodd Rd. - Aloma Ave. B None N/A 1.59% NO NO NO
DikeRoad Howell Bnmch Rei - Dodd ReI B Nonc NlA 3.52"A. NO. NO NO
Dodd Rd. - Tuskawilla Rei A None NlA 4.03% NO NO NO
Slavia Road Red BUll Lake Rd. - Aloma Ave. E None N/A 6.05% YES NO NO
Red Bu Lake Road SR 436 - Winter Pari:: Rei E None NlA 8.54% YES NO NO
Wurtcr Pari:: Rd. - Eagle Circle E None N/A 11.74% YES NO NO
Ealde Circle. Noddinl! Pines Way C* None N/A 20.82% YES NO NO
NociciinI! Pines Wav. Dodd Rei C* None N/A 24.82"A. YES NO NO
Dodd Rei - TlIIkawilla Rei C* None N/A 28.79% YES NO NO
Tuskawilla Rei . Sun Dr. E None N/A 37.90% YES NO NO
Sun Dr. - Citrus Rei E None NlA 38.44% YES NO NO
Citrus Rd. - SIavia Rd. E Nonc NlA 40.04% YES NO NO
Slavia Rei - Site EmraDcc (soulh) E Nonc N/A 40.57% YES NO NO
Site Entnmcc (aou1h) - Dovera Rei E Nonc NlA 38.64% YES NO NO
Dovera Rei - Oviedo MarketIllace Blvd. 0 Nonc NlA 37.85% YES NO NO
Oviedo Marketplace Blvd. - TBrRCt Eo1nmce 0 None NlA 42.55% YES NO NO
T8I'l!Ct EolrBncc - Gr=Wav 0 Nonc NlA 45.06% YES NO NO
Gr=Way - Aloma Ave. E Nonc N/A 34.42"A. YES NO NO
Mitchell Hammock Road Aloma Ave. - SR 434 C* Nonc N/A 55.60% YES NO NO
SR 434 - Lockwood Rei C Nonc NlA 18.S3% YES NO NO
Rei SR 426 - SR 434 B None NlA 6.54% YES NO NO
Scminola Boulevard US 17-92. Lake Dr. C None N/A 4.80% NO NO NO
Seminola Blvd. . Tuskawilla Rei B Nonc NlA 6.41% YES NO NO
Mitchell Hammock Road Aloma Ave. . SR 434 E None N/A 2.02".4 NO NO NO
SR 434 - Lockwood Rei B None N/A 3.27"A. NO NO NO
Rd. SR 426 - SR 434 C None NlA 15.99% YES NO NO
Seminola Boulevard US 17-92 . Lake Dr. 0 Nonc NlA 26.54% YES NO NO
Scminola Blvd. - Tusk.awilla Rei 0 Nonc N/A 9.92% YES NO NO
CR 419 -kwood Rei C Nonc N/A 16.23% YES I NO NO
~'-
~ Gllltliltg JIlcl=n r-:;" A1fg1Ut !Ape RbNJuztot. 1M.
.
-
PBge28
Table 5-1
PROPOSED JMPROVEMENr NEEDS, YEAR Z005
INTERSECTIONS
~ Mutr.etplace
.
Oviedo Sig.
Projected Impl'OY'CCl Mulrdpblce 8<
No. Location LOS ImDl'OWllleat LOS ShmlftClUlce SiI! Adv. Adv.
INTERSECIlONS
I Red BIIR Lake Road SR436 F Fair Share ofFeasibi1itv StudY N1A 25.80"/0 YES YES YES
2 Red BIIR Lake Road Dodd Road D None N/A N/A NO NO NO
3 Red Bug Lake Road Tuskawi1Ia Road E None N1A 0.00"/0 NO NO NO
4 Red BugLalce Road SUlI Drive D None N/A N1A NO NO NO
5 Red BIIR Lake Road Citrus Road D None N1A N/A NO NO NO
6 Red BUR Lake Road SlaviaRoad B None N1A N1A NO NO NO
7 Red Bug Lake Road Doven1 Road D None N/A N/A NO NO NO
8 Red Bug Lake Road@ Oviedo MaIUlplace Blvd. D None N1A N1A NO NO NO
9 Red Bug Lake Road tW GreeneWay ramps west A None N/A N/A NO NO NO
10 Red BIIR Lake Road tW GreeneWay ramps east B None N/A N/A NO NO NO
11 Red Bug Lalce Road tW SR426 D None N/A N/A NO NO NO
12 Mitchell ~Road all LockwoodBouIewrd D None N/A N/A NO NO NO
13 TuskawiIla Road tW Dike Road B None N1A N1A NO NO NO
14 TuskawiIla Road tW Lalce Drive B None N1A N/A NO NO NO
15 Tuskawi1la Road all Winter Spring. Bou1ewrd C None N1A N1A NO NO NO
16 SR434 Road C None N/A N1A NO NO NO
17 SR434 Woods Bou1ewrd C None . N1A N1A NO NO NO
18 SR434 Mitchell Hammock Road D None N1A N1A NO NO NO
19 SR434 SR426 F To be c!elermiDed N1A 23.90% YES YES YES
20 SR434 GreeneWav ramps east B None - N1A N/A NO NO NO
21 SR434 GreeneWlIV fllIIlDI west A None N1A N/A NO NO- NO
22 SR434 Tuskawi1Ia Road C None N1A NlA NO NO NO
23 SR434 SR419 D None N1A N1A NO NO NO
24 SR426 Tuskawi1Ia Road B None NlA N/A NO NO NO
25 SR426 GreeneWav rtIIDIlS west B None N1A N1A NO NO NO
26 SR426 GreeneWav ramps east C None N1A N1A NO NO NO
V SR426 Dean Road C None N1A N1A NO NO NO
28 SR426 Road C None N1A N1A NO NO NO
29 SR426 Oviedo MarketDlace BOIIlewrd B None N1A N/A NO NO NO
30 SR426 Winter Springs Bou1ewrd C None N1A N/A NO NO NO
31 SR426 Lake J..-m AveDue C None N1A N/A NO NO NO
32 Lockwood BOIIlevard7af CR419 C None N1A N/A NO NO NO
Projected Improwd Vlera Sig.8<
Location LOS Im......wmeat LOS SlmtlliClUlce Sm Adv. Adv.
1 RAMPS A None N1A 15.25% YES NO NO
2 Red BllRLake Rd.ID SR417NB B None N1A 25.75% YES NO NO
3 RedBugLakeRd.ID SR417 SB A None N1A 13.88% YES NO NO
4 SR417 SB to Red Bug Lalce Road C None N1A 23.25% YES NO NO
5 SR417 NB to Red Bug Lake Road A None N1A \.19"-' NO NO NO
6 SR417 NB ID SR434 A None N1A 1.00% NO NO NO
7 SR434 to SR417SB A None N1A 3.00% NO NO NO
8 SR426 to SR417 NB A None N1A 3.25% NO NO NO
.
Soun:tJ:
GI4tti", JacIaon~' A",lin lApc Ri..ha11.1nc.
.
...
-
.
,-
L
~
.
.
Page 29
6.0 CONCLUSIONS
Based on the adequate facilities provisions of the adopted ECFRPC staff guideline, the Transportation
Uniform Standard Rule (91-2.045), and the Oviedo Marketplace Development Order, the analyses
contained in this report projects no significant and adverse impacts to roadway segments and two (2)
significant and adverse impacts to intersections (Red Bug Lake Road @ SR436 and SR434 @ SR426)
in Year 2005 with full buildout of the proposed Oviedo Marketplace development program.
Because improvements to the two intersections are cost prohibitive, mitigation options are being
discussed with the appropriate jurisdictions/agencies. Seminole County staff' and FOOT staff have
agreed that paying a proportionate share of the cost of a study to analyze improvement options to the
Red Bug Lake Road and SR436 intersection is appropriate. The Seminole County Board of County
Commissioners will consider the proposed study in September 1999, Discussions with the City of
Oviedo, Seminole County and the FOOT are in process to determine the appropriate mitigation for the
SR434 and SR426 intersection.
Traffic Impact Study
Oviedo Marketplace
August 20, 1999
'Irr;
!r~ ,n - -, i'il-"il
iu'. Ii
N Q
If HI'
~A~Ji
lL.Jr
LJt
~
QU
JU
wU'-
J:W
-
Page 30
.
APPENDIX
Table of Contents Page
Methodology Letter 30
Roadway Service Volumes 52
Ramp Service Volumes 55
Intersection Analyses, Year 1999 57
. Survey Questionnaire 91
Annual Growth Rates 93
Intersections Significance Methodology 96
ART-TAB Analyses 100
Intersection Analyses, Year 2005 132
K and D Factors 166
Programmed Intersection Improvements 184
Traffic Impact Study
Oviedo Marketplace
August 20,1999
.
.
.
.
Page 31
METHODOLOGY LETTER
Traffic Impact Study
Oviedo Marketplace
August 20, 1999
.
[C
WilliamJ. Anglin. Jr.
[hvid L Barth
py H. bum
Jack F. G1an:ing
J2Y R. Hood
TimoEhy T. J2ckson
William C. Kercher. Jr.
W2lcer M. Kulash
S~ron K. urmncia
S. lUymond Lopez
John F. Rine~rt
G"'b'Ory A. Bryl2
Clutles P. Cobble
Mic~1 R. Cochnn
. JelTrey s. Collins
Anthony C. Curm
Rich2rC E. Durr. Jr.
M2ry lUulerson Eg:>n
Uruce C. H21l
Carey S. H2yo
G:lil D. Lacey
William D. lices
Edw:ud J. McKinney
Thom:u J. McMaclo:n. Jr.
John J. Moore 1II
John H. Pm:y
Troy P. Russ
Julie ~ms Scofield
~ C. Scchler
Nadwt P. SiM
Laun K. Turner
RDmld L UriDnw
Go Wade: W2I k.:r
Co",.."i'"
. Plo""i"t
33 E:ut Pine: Street
OrbnJo FI"rid2 31l11l1
I': -4\17 1\-43 1>551
F: ~1l7 1\3'1 lill'J
lh.",,'lhC' t:I EU uu"5,c1~
GLATTING
JACKSON
KERCHER
ANGLIN
LOPEZ
RINEHART
December 9, 1998
Mr. Fred Milch
East Central Florida Regional Planning Council
1011 Wymore Road, Suite 105
Winter Park, FL 32789
RE:
Oviedo Marketplace DR!
Assumptions and Methodology for Traffic Monitoring and Modeling
Glatting Jackson Project No. 3594.01
Dear Fred:
This letter presents our revised methodology for performing the Oviedo Marketplace traffic
monitoring/modeling study. The revisions reflect the comments received at the October 22
methodology meeting and a revised methodology for estimating project traffic distribution.
Prior to the initiation of each phase beyond Phase 2, the development order requires that a
monitoring/modeling program be performed to ascertain the LOS on facilities where the Oviedo
Marketplace project is estimated to contribute an amount of traffic greater than or equal to five percent
(5 %) of the service volume at the standard adopted in the comprehensive plan of the jurisdiction in
which the roadway is located.
A Notice of Proposed Change (NOPC) is being prepared to add land (referred to as Parcel 35) acquired
by the Rouse Company along Oviedo Marketplace Boulevard west of SR426. Trips associated with the
land uses proposed for Parcel 35 will be transferred from the unbuilt ponion of the Mall.
An NOPC is also being prepared to reflect proposed changes in land use des~ons and intensities.
The following presents an overview of the methodology and assumptions proposed for the
monitoring/modeling study for Phase 3 of the Oviedo Marketplace DR!.
1.0
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
The Oviedo Marketplace DR! is located on Red Bug Lake Road immediately west of the GreeneWay in
Seminole County, Florida (Figure 1).
The existing and proposed land uses include a regional shopping center, associated retail, restaurants,
office, reSidential dwelling units and an extension of the Winter Park Hospital. The total development
program and phasing schedule are summarized in Table 1. The site plan, with parcel delimination is
presented in Frgure 2.
'30
Monitoring/Modeling Methodology
Oviedo Marketplace
811 '~".ofFtet
rn - j
NcnIl 12
J
.
-
,
VI
~
f
gj
f 12
I
__~_..L_._--
l
i
12
I
i'fi
~Q<
-)i\~
",Vl'-
"1/".'
.~.; .
f(.J
rC'
- r-
- y
r------ --- -- .--,.
~-c lun,..
,&C....
..~c...
a..". .
,....
."'....y
OvIedo Marketplace
Rgure ,
- _location Map '-
Table 1
SUMMARY OF APPROVEDIPROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Oviedo Marketplace
.
Intensity
Phases 1 & 2 Phase 3 (2001)
Land Use Parcel Constructed Proposed Proposed Total -
Phase 1
Retail 18 -- 10,000 GLA -- 10,000 GFA
Retail 19 -- 10,000 GLA -- 10,000 GFA
Convenience with gas 20 -- 2,720 GFA - - 2,720 GFA
Chills 21A 5,683 GFA -- -- 5,683 GFA
Target and Garden Center 21B 128,634 GFA -- -- 128,634 GFA
Wellncss Center 22 39,000 GFA - - - - 39,000 GFA
Commercial Retail 23 12,205 GFA -- - - 12,205 GFA
Steak-n-Shake 24 3,508 GFA - - 0_ 3,508 GFA
Fazoli's 25 3,206 GFA -- - - 3,206 GFA
Borders Books 26 25,040 GFA -- - - 25,040 GFA
Jared Jewelers 26 -- 5,700 GLA - - 5,700 GLA
Qualtiy Restaurant 28 - - 11 ,200 GFA -- 11,200 GFA
Family Funeral Care 29 8,682 GFA 8,682 GFA
High Turnover Restaurant 30 -- 7,000 GFA - 0 7,000 GFA
Retail 31 - - 15,000 GLA -- 15,000 GFA
Quality Restaurant 32 -- 6,700 GFA _0 6,700 GFA
Phase 2
Regional Shopping Center 12 730,128 GLA 295,372 GLA - - 1,025,500 GLA
Movie Theater 12 22 Screens -- - 0 22 Screens
Retail 16 - - 30,000 GLA - - 30,000 GFA
Medical CamDus - Retail 17 -- 10,000 GLA - 0 10,000 GLA
Medical Campus - Medical Office 27 40,139 GFA -- 40,139 GFA
Medical Campus - Medical Office 27 - - 33,973 GFA - 0 33,973 GFA
Medical Campus - Dianostic Services 27 -- 12,000 GFA - - 12,000 GFA
Medical Campus - Urgent Care Center 27 5,981 GFA - - 5,981 GFA
Medical Campus - Ambulatory Surgery Center 27 -- 12,000 GFA -- 12,000 GFA
High Turnover Restaurant 35 - - 7,000 GFA - - 7,000 GFA
High Turnover Restaurant 35 -- 5,600 GFA - - 5,600 GFA
High Turnover Restaurant 35 - - 3,200 GFA -- 3,200 GFA
Quality Restaurant 35 -- 7,000 GFA -- 7,000 GFA
Quality Restaurant 35 -- 6,400 GFA -- 6,400 GFA
Quality Restaurant 35 -- 7,300 GFA -- 7,300 GFA
Retail 35 -- 13,500 GLA -- 13,500 GLA
-
Phase 3 -
Retail 13 -- -- 180,000 GLA 180,000 GLA
High Turnover Restaurant 13 -- -- 10,000 GFA 10,000 GFA
High Turnover Restaurant 13 -- -- 10,000 GFA 10,000 GFA
Retail 14 - - -- 160,000 GLA 160,000 GLA
Medical Campus - Medical Office 15 -- -- 59,000 GFA 59,000 GFA
Medical Campus - Hospital 27 -- -- 120 Beds 120 Beds
Office !Showroom 34 -- -- 60,000 GFA 60,000 GFA
Sinale Familv 36 -- - - 4 DU 4 DU
.
GF A - grass t100r _
GLA - grass1casablc_
Sourca: The Vie1'G Company
The R.ouu Company
GlattiIfgJa&mm Kercher Allglln Lope RillUuut. lru:.
.
32--
.
,,r{jf;,1f!!!p4f!!
.- ..n~~.'.
!'f;~~'\~I~
,
.
-.
J.&&m4
-..- C3l)' flt 0riDd0 J-t,.."'"' .,.
OJ..... 2.................. c..-wllIa ~.
.....-
'.. UlllUlllO SP '" ",.
.
Figure 2
Master Plan
~c ;::::~:.
uacaaa
;::::u Oviedo Marketplace
1'.. 1200'
E9~-
"33
GLATTING
JACKSON
KERCHER
ANGLIN
[C LOPEZ .
RINEHART
2.0 PROPOSED IMPACT AREA
The proposed primary impact area for Oviedo Marketplace is shown on Frgure 1. The primary impact
area will be expanded if peak-hour trips with one end in Oviedo Marketplace are projected to equal or
exceed five percent 9f the adopted LOS service volume on roadway segments outside the bound of the
proposed area.
2.1 Roadway Segments
Roadway segments in the primary impact area will be analyzed using service volumes contained in the
comprehensive plan of the jurisdiction in which the roadway segment is located.
Table 2 presents the number of lanes, service volumes, acceptable LOS standard, and K and D factors
or each roadway segment scheduled for analysis. The facility type, service volume and acceptable
level of service are based on the local comprehensive plan of the jurisdiction in which the roadway
segment is located, The K and D factors are based on actUal roadway conditions, and the 1995 FDOT
LOS Manual.
Roadway segment analysis will be performed for existing conditions (Year 1998) and buildout .
conditions (Year 2001) using methods consistent with the 1994 Highway Capacity Manual. For urban
anerials, a staged analysis will be employed. Initial analysis will be done using the service volumes
presented in Table 2. Based on the results of the initial analy~is, a more detailed analysis using ART-
TAB. ART-PLAN or HCM anerial analysis may be performed.
The service volumes at the adopted standard shown in Table 2 will be used to calculate the significance
of project trips on roadway segments; that is to determine where trips with one end in Oviedo
Marketplace are projected to represent five percent or more of the level of service standard adopted in
the comprehensive plan of the jurisdiction in which the roadway segment is located.
2.2 Intersections/Ramps
The intersections/ramps within the primary impact area that will be analyzed in detail for the afternoon
peak-hour are shown on Figure 3. 10 addition to those intersections shown on Figure 3, all site access
locations will be analyzed. Additional intersections may be analyzed based on the projected significance
of site traffic in the intersections.
Intersections will be analyzed utilizing the 1994 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM)_ operational
methodology for existing conditions (Year 1998) and buildout conditions (Year 2(01) using the existing
timing and phasing plans provided by Seminole County Traffic Operations. Project traffic will be
considered significant if PM peak-hour trips with one end in the Oviedo Marketplace are projected to
represent five percent (5 %) or more of the theoretical service volume at the adopted standard for each
lane group.
.
Monitoring/Modeling Methodology
Oviedo Marketplace
gt/-
Page 5
-
Table 2
ROADWAY SEGMENT DATA
<Medo Marketplace
E+C Service
Lanesl Accept- Volume
Segment RespoDSible Facility able Accept LOS Peak
Roadwav From - To Al!encv TVDe LOS - (PB/PD) K D Dir.
Scmorm Boulevard (SR 43 SRSO . Uuiwnity Blvd. FOOT 6 ART D 2840 0.0740 0.5320 NB
Uuiwnity Blvd. - A10ma Ave. FOOT 6 ART D 2840 0.0739 0.5146 NB
A10ma Ave. - Howell Branch Rei. FOOT 6 ART D 2840 0.0762 0.5220 NB
Howell Brmch Rd. - LakClllOllt Ave. FOOT 6 ART D 2840 0.0880 0.5680 NB
Lab:moDt Ave. - Red Bug Lake Rd. FOOT 6 ART D. 2840 0.0880 0.5680 NB
Red Bug Lake Rd. - US 17-92 FOOT 6 ART D 2840 0.0880 0.5680 EB
US 17-92-CR427 FOOT 6 ART D 2840 0.0880 0.5680 EB
Goldearod Road (SR 551) sa 50 . UDivcnity Blvd. FOOT 4 ART E 1890 0.0810 0.5070 SB
Univcnity Blvd. . Aloma Ave. FOOT 4 ART E 3110 0.0845 0,jTr1 NB
Dodd Road Howell Branch Rd. - Dike Rd. Seminole 4COL E 1000 0.0910 0.5680 NB
Dike Rd. - Red Bug Lake Rei. Seminole 4COL E 1000 0.0910 0.5680 NB
Tuskawilla Road Aloma Ave. - Dike Rd. Seminole 4 ART E 2200 0.0910 0.5680 NB
Dike Rd. . Red Bug Lake Rd. Seminole 6 ART E 3300 0.0910 0.5680 SB
Red Bug Lake Rd. . Lake Dr. Seminole 4 ART E 2200 0.0910 0.5680 NB
Lake Dr. - Wurtcr Springs Blvd. Seminole 4 ART E 2200 0.0910 0.5680 sa
Wimer Springs Blvd. - SR 434 Seminole 4 ART E 2200 0.0910 0.5680 SB
G=cWay SR 50 . Univcnity Blvd. Tumpike 4 F(2) D 3230 0.0920 0.5680 NB
Univcnitv Blvd. - Aloma Ave. Turnpike 4 F(2) D 3230 0.0920 0.5680 NB
Aloma Ave.. - Red Bug LaIcc Rei. Turnpike 4F(2) D 3230 0.0920 0.5680 NB
Red Bug Lake Rd. . SR 434 TIIlDlIikc 4 F(2) D 3230 0.0920 0.5680 NB
SR 434 - Lake Mary Blvd. Tumpilce 4 F(2) D 3230 0.0920 0.5680 NB
Dean Road SR 50 . UDivcrsity Blvd. Orange 4 ART E 1890 0.0940 0.S7S0 S8
Univcnity Blvd. - McCulloch Rei. Orange 2 ART E 1710 0.0974 0$75 NB
McCulloch Rd. - Aloma AVCDlIC Seminole 2 ART E 1000 0.0910 0.5680 NB
Rouse Rd. sa 50 . Uuivenity Blvd. Orange 2COL E 800 0.1036 0.5221 NB
SR 434 sa 50 - Uuivenity Blvd. FOOT 6 ART E 2840 0.0821 0,j587 NB
Uuiwnity Blvd. . Corporate Blvei. FOOT 6 ART E 2840 0.0842 0.6576 NB
Corporate Blvd. . McCulloch Rd. FOOT 6 ART E 2840 0.0842 0.6576 NB
McCulloch Rd. . Cbapman Rei. FOOT 6 ART E 2840 0.0880 0.5680 NB
Olapman Rd. - Alafaya Woocb Blvd. FOOT 6 ART E 2840 0.0880 0.5680 NB
AWaya Woocb Blvd.. Mitchell Hammock Rei. FOOT 6 ART E 2840 0.0880 0.5680 NB
Mitchell Hammock Rd. . Aloma Ave. FOOT 2 ART D 940 0.0880 0.5680 sa
Alama Ave. - G=cWay FOOT 2 ART D 940 0.0880 0.5680 we
GrceDcWay - Tuskawilla Rd. FOOT 4 ART D 2480 0.0880 0.5680 we
Tuabwilla Rd. - SR 419 FOOT 4 ART E 2480 0.0880 0.5680 EB
SR 419 - US 17-92 FOOT 4 ART E 2480 0.0880 0.5680 EB
US 17-92-CR427 FOOT 4 ART E 2480 0.0880 0.5680 EB
l..oc:kwood Road McCu110ch Rd. - Sc:miDole Creek Dr. ScmiDoIc 4 ART E 1890 0.0910 0.5680 NB
Scmmole Cr=k Dr. . Little Econ River Seminole 4 ART E 1890 0.0910 0.5680 NB
Little Ecoa River - Mitchell Hammock Rd. Seminole 4 ART E 1890 0.09]0 _ 0,j680- NB
Mitchell Hammoc:Ic Rd. . SR 419 Oviedo 4 ART E 1890 0.0910 0.5680 NB
sa 419 - CR 426 Oviedo 2 ART E 1710 0.0910 0.5680 NB
McCulloch Road sa 434 . Loc:Icwoocl Rd. Seminole 4 ART D 1670 0.0910 0.5680 EB
UDivcnity Boulcvmi sa 436 . Golclcmod Rd. Ormgc 6 ART E 2840 0.0828 Q.6005 EB
Goldcarod Rd. . Econ Tr. 0raDgc 6 ART E 2840 0.0946 0.5983 EB
Ecoa Tr. . Grcc:aeWay Orange 6 ART E 2840 0.0946 0.5983 EB
GrccacWay - Oem Rd. Orange 6 ART E 2840 0.0913 0.5504 EB
Oem Rd. - Rouse Rd. Orange 6 ART E 2840 0.0872 0.5049 we
R.aac Rd. - Alafaw. Tr. Or.uule 6 ART E 2840 0.0865 0.581S we
Note: Facility type and service vol_ are baed OD tbc loed ~ ..........~ plaD oftbc jurisclic:tiOll in which tbc roa4way acgmcat is located
A=:ptaIife Icvd oflClYico ia bascd OD the """"",..b....siVe plan of the ~ in which the roadWay aegmc:a1 is loc:&cd
~le Icvd of ICIYicc and service wI_ CoT the FIBS is catab~ by the FOOT
Relpolllible as=cY ia tho agcocy Ibat bas _;-- n:spoo:tibility CoT tho ioadway
Source: GUztti1lg Jadaon K~hN Angli71 Lope RiMJuut. JIIC.
.
'is-
Table 2
ROADWAY SEGMENT DATA
OvIedoMa.rkdplace
E+C Service
LaDes! Accept- Volume
Segment Responsible Facility able Accept LOS Peak
Roadway From-To A!ency Type LOS (PBlPD) K D Dir.
Aloma Ave. (SR 426) US 17-m. - LaItcmoat Ave.. FOOT 4 ART E 1890 0.0703 0.5794 EB
LaItcmoat Ave.. - SR 436 FOOT 4 ART E 1890 0.0703 0.5794 EB
SR 436 - Goldcarod Rd. FOOT 4 ART E 1890 0.0756 0.5469 EB
Goldcarod Rd. - Howell Branch Rd. FOOT 4 ART E 1890 0.0721 0.5710 EB
Howell Branch Rd. - Tuskawi11a Rd. FOOT 4 ART E 2480 0.0880 0.5680 EB
Tuskawilla Rd. . Grcc:acWay FOOT 4 ART E 2480 0.0&80 0.5680 WB
Grcc:acWay - Dean Rd. FOOT 4 ART E 2480 0.0880 0.5680 EB
Dean Rd. - Chapman Rd. FOOT 4 ART E 2480 0.0880 0.5680 NB -
Rd. . Slavia Rd.. FOOT 4 ART E 2480 0.0880 0.5680 NB
S1avia Rd. . Mitchell Hammock Rd. FOOT 4 ART E 2480 0.0880 0.5680 NB
Mitchell Hammoclc Rd. - Oviedo Marketplace FOOT 4 ART D 1890 0.0880 0.5680 NB
Oviedo Marketplace Blvd. - Wild=' Springs BI FOOT 4 ART D 1890 0.0880 0.5680 NB
W. Broadway S1. (SR 426) Wild=' Springs Blvd. . Lake JCSS1Ip Dr. FOOT 2 ART D 890 0.0880 0.5680 EB
Lake JCSS1Ip Dr. - SR 434 FOOT 2 ART 0 890 0.0880 0.5680 EB
Gc=va Dr. (CR 426) CR 419 - I..ockwood Rd. Scminole 2COL E 1000 0.0910 0.5680 EB
Loc:kwood Rd. - Seminole WoocI5 Blvd. SemiDole 2COL 0 1000 0.0910 0.5680 EB
Horatio AVCIIIIC US 17-m. - Thistle La. Orange 4 ART 0 1890 0.0851 0.6253 EB
Howell Branch Thistle La. . Lake Howell Rd. Seminole 4 ART 0 1890 0.0910 0.5680 ~-
Lake Howell Rd. - SR 436 SemiDole 4 ART 0 1890 0.0910 0.5680 EB
SR 436 - Dike Rd. ScmiDole 4 ART 0+20% 2270 0.0910 0.5680 EB
Dike ReI. - Dodd ReI. Seminate 4 ART D+20% 2270 0.0910 0.5680 EB
Dodd Rd. - Aloma Ave.. Seminole 4 ART 0+20% 2270 0.0910 0.5680 EB
Dike Road Howell Bruch Rd. - Dodd Rd SellIiDole 2 ART E 1000 0.0910 0.5680 NB
Dodd Rd. . Tuskawilla Rd. Seminole 2 ART E 1000 0.0910 0.5680 WB
SlaviaRoad Red Bug Lake Rd. - Aloma Ave. Seminole 2 ART E 1000 0.0910 0.5680 EB
Red Bug Lake Road SR 436 - Wmter Pm Rd. Seminole 6 ART E 3300 0.0910 0.5680 EB
Wmtcr Pm Rd. - Eagle Cin:1e Seminole 6 ART E 3300 0.0910 0.5680 EB
Eagle CUcle . Nodding PiDea Way Seminole 4 ART E 2200 0.0910 0.5680 EB
NoddiDg}>iDes Way - Dodd ReI. Seminole 4 ART E 2200 0.0910 0.5680 EB
Dodd Rd. - Tusbwilla Rd. SemiDole 4 ART E 2200 0.0910 0.5680 EB
Tuskawi11a Rd. - SlID Dr. Seminole 6 ART E 3300 0.0910 0.5680 EB
SlID Dr. - CilZUl Rd. SemiDole 6 ART E 3300 0.0910 0.5680 EB
CilZUl Rd. - S1avia Rd. Scminole 6 ART E 3300 0.0910 0.5680 EB
S1avia Rd. . Site EaIrmec (acndb) Seminole 6 ART E 3300 0.0910 0.5680 EB
Site EaIrmec (acndb) - Dow:ra Rd. Seminole 6 ART E 3300 0.0910 0.5680 EB
Dovcn Rd. - Oviedo Marlcctplace Blvd. ScmiDole 6 ART E 3300 0.0910 0.5680 EB
Oviedo Maricdplace Blvd. . GRcueWay ScmiDole 6 ART E 3300 0.0910 0.5680 EB
Grcc:acWay - Aloma Ave.. ScmiIIoIe 4 ART E 2200 0.0910 0.5680 EB
Mitcbell Hammock Road Aloma Ave.. - SR 434 Oviedo 4 ART E 1890 0.0910 0.5680 EB
SR 434 . Loc:kwood Rd. Oviedo 4 ART E 1890 0.09.10 . 0.5680 EB
CbapmaD Rd. SR 426 - SR 434 ScmiIIoIe 2COL. E 1000 0.0910 0.5680 EB
SemiDola Boulevard US 17-92 - Lake Dr. SemiDole 4COL D 1670 0.0910 0.5680 EB
Lake Driw Seminola Blvd. - TUlbwilla Rd. SemiDole 4COL E 2200 0.0910 0.5680 EB
CR419 SR 434 - I..ockwood Rd. ScmiIIolc 2COL 0 1000 0.0910 0.5680 EB
L.oc:kwooci Rd. . Scc:oad St. Seminole 4COL E 1890 0.0910 0.5680 EB
Wader SIIimD Boulevud SR426 - Nortbem Way Wader Springs 4COL D 1670 0.0910 0.5680 WB
Nortbem Way. Nortbem Way Wader SpriDgs 2COL D 730 0.0910 0.5680 WB
Nortbcm Way. Tuabwill Rd. Wader Springs 2COL D 730 0.0910 0.5680 EB
Nortbcm Way South Wmtcr SuriDlII Blvd. - Wader S..mu.s Blvd. Wader SarinD 2COL D 730 0.0910 0.5680 EB
Nate: F&e:ility t)'pe aDd ICrYicc wbaDc:s arc baed aD tba 10cal gcr....--" _'~ plan of the jurUdictiolL in wbich the rtI8liway Iq!IDCII1 ia 10catcd
A--t..ti1C Ic:vd of ItrVicc ia baed aD tba ............bcasM: plm of the COIlII;tY in which the roadWay Iq!IDCII1 ia 10catcd
~1e level of service aDd ItrVicc volumc:l far the FIRS ia established by tile FOOT
RapOaIible apcy ia tile agacy that bas !IlI'mt........... rcspoIII1lrility for the iaadway
Sourc8: GIatti1rg JadcsDn K#rcMr Anglin /Ape R.iMlJtzrt. lnc.
.
3b
I ; .
.
'. I
II
w
-~
.
.
~~:l<;:
~
~
i1i!
I
!.~INOLBCOU~!
ORANOE COUNTY.
[C ~ Oviedo Marketplace
. ..
Figure 3 .
Intersections Scheduled Anllvsls
- rn.,. Scale In Hnes .
Wr-- I
Nonh 0 2.5 5 10,.
GLATTING
JACKSON
KERCHER
ANGLIN .
[C LOPEZ
RINEHART
2.3 Planned and Programmed Improvements
-~..
Table 3 summarizes the road improvements that are planned or programmed within the primary impact
area for Oviedo Marketplace. These improvements were identified from the Orlando Urban Area
Transponation Imprc)Vement Program. 1998/99 - 2002/03, the Oviedo Capital Improvements Element,
the Seminole County Capital Improvements Element, and the Winter Springs Capital Improvements
Element.
3.0 TOTAL TRAFFIC
Systems traffic forecasts will be prepared using the adopted OUATS model. Socioeconomic data will
be derived from a straight-line interpolation between the adopted 1990 and 2020 OUATS data.
Socioeconomic data will be reviewed to ensure reasonable inclusion of approved development.
The existing OUATS zone structure is shown in Fzgure 4 and the modified zone structure is shown in
Figure 5. The socioeconomic data (population and employment) for each zone structure is presented in
Table 4.
The results of the model output will be reviewed for reasonableness.
.
s~
Monitoring/Modeling Methodology
Oviedo Marketplace
Page 9
.
Tile
PLANNED AND PROGRAMMED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
Oviedo Marketplace
.
S~&ment Length Start Responsible
Roadway From - To Improvement (Miles) Phase Date Agency Status
Tuskawilla Road East Lake Dr. . Wmlcr Spnnga Blvd. Widen to four lanes 1.0 CST 1998 Senunole County Progranuned
Tuskawilla Road Winter Spnnga Blvd. - SR434 Widen to four lanes 1.6 CST 1998 Semmole Counly Programmed
SR434 Tuskawilla Rd. . SR417 Widen to four lanes 2.0 CST 2000 FOOT Progranuned
CR419 Lockwood Blvd. - OVIedo Clly Limlll WIden to four lanes 2.3 CST 1998 Semmole County Programmed
CR419 Oviedo Clly Limlll. Second Street Widen to four lanes 1.0 CST 2000 Semmole Counly Programmed
Dodd Road Red Bug Lake Road. Howell Branch Road Widen to four lane. 1.9 CST 2000 Seounole County progranuned
Winter Pule ))rive RCilDug Lake Rd. . Semmol. Blvd. Reconslrucllo lwo-Iane divided 2.0 CST 2000 Semmole County Programmed
SR417 ,USI7.92 - Lake Mary Blvd. New four lane tOIrroad 1.7 CST 2000 em. Counly Expy. Auth. Programmed
SR417 I Lake Mary Blvd. . Rinehart Rd. New fourTane toll road 2.S CST 2001 em. County Expy. AUiJ1. Progranuned
1.4 @SR417 New mterchan8e .. CST 2000 FOOT Progranuned
East Lake Drive Scmanolia Blvd. - Tuskawilla Rd. Widen to four lanes 2.S CST 2000 Semmole County Programmed
SR426 SR417. M1toheU Hammock Rd. Widen torourTanes 3.3 CST 1999 FOOT Progranuned
Red Bug Like Road SR436 . Eagle Carcle Widen to SIX lanes 0.7 CST 2001 Semmote Counly Progranuncd
SR434 McCullOCh Rd. . M11chell Hammock Rd. Widen to SIX lianes 3.0 CST 2001 FOOT Progranulled
Notes:
CST. Conslruotion
Soun:e: Orlando Urban Ana T/"QIUportatlon Improvement Program, 1998/99.2002/3
Seminole County Traffic CIrculation Element Project Schedule
w
""
.
Lake
Jesup
I
70
6~ .
77
LEGEND
-- Zone Boundary
8S Zone Number
[C~Oviedo Marketplace
Figure 4
Existing Zone stlUctur.
. ill NTS.
I I
North 0 I 2 ..
4D
tm
.
.
Lake
Jesup
71
~
~
. .. ...S1.434 ..n
LEC;;END
-- Zone Boundary
8S Zone Number
.
[C~ Oviedo Marketplace
Figure 5
Modified Zone Structure
81.
NonIlO
NTS
2
I
..
~(
Table 4
REDISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT
Oviedo Marketplace
.
ORlG. TOTAL NEW TOTAL
TAZ DU POP. HOTEL EMP. TAZ DU POP. HOTEL EMP. NOTES
69 646 1666 0 268 69 468 1310 0 275
926 178 356 0 0
71 678 1758 0 762 71 190 496 0 0
927 151 406 0 762
929 317 856 0 0
72 905 2154 - 0 102 72 50 138 0 102
930 351 736 0 0
950 504 1280 0 0
75 1472 3373 0 1200 75 0 0 0 358
222 0 0 0 345 Project
224 0 0 0 330 Project
936 0 0 0 71 -
938 87 236 0 142
939 400 1087 0 211
932 0 0 0 162
935 935 1914 0 0
933 50 136 0 256
76 1353 3249 0 402 76 728 1745 0 0
941 425 958 0 364
942 200 546 0 38
77 2447 6326 0 1038 77 1711 4394 0 997
944 736 1932 0 41
81 583 1555 108 3328 223 0 0 0 243 Project
221 0 0 0 2036 Project
220 0 0 0 3554 Project
225 4 9 0 0 Project
945 574 1536 0 0
947 0 0 _0 30
948 5 10 0 0
83 1259 3397 0 214 83 824 2354 0 98
951 241 612 0 0
954 194 431 0 116
84 1808 4543 0 497 84 1670 4306 0 497
956 138 237 0 0 .,
85 95 258 0 303 85 0 0 0 303
927 95 258 0 0
87 1365 3997 0 281 87 930 2826 0 281
957 328 872 0 0
959 107 299 0 0
88 1142 3374 0 250 88 526 1754 0 250
960 241 642 0 0
962 375 978 0 0
Source: Adopted MPO Socioeconomic Data Set
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart. Inc.
l/L,
.
.
.
[C
GLATTING
JACKSON
KERCHER
ANGLIN
LOPEZ
RINEHART
4.0 PROJECT TRAFFIC
Trip generation for the Oviedo Marketplace land uses is based on the ITE Trip Generation Repon, 6th
Edition and surveys conducted at the site. Trip generation rates/formulas are presented in Table 5 and a
summary of surveyed rates are presented in Table 6. Daily and pm peak-hour trip generation for Year
2001 is presented iIi Table 7.
4.1 Internal Capture
Internal trips are those which begin and end within the project site. External trips have either an o;';gin
or destination outside the project site,
Internal trips were estimated for work-based shopping/eating trips and for interaction between the
hospital and medical office. Afternoon peak-hour internal capture is estimated at about 5.5 %. of the
total trip generation. Estimates of internal capture for the afternoon peak-hour are summarized in
Table 8.
4.2
Pass-By Traffic
Pass-by trips come directly from the traffic stream passing the facility on the adjacent street system and
do not require a diversion from another roadway. Pass-by trips were estimated for retail and restaurant
land uses based on information contained in the lTE Trip Generation Report, Fifth Edition. The
estimates will be adjusted, if necessary, in accordance with the ECFRPC staff guidelines and the 1995
FDOT LOS Manual. The estimated trips for the regional shopping center, hospital complex and
general office space will be considered primary trips and therefore, part of the background traffic
volume for the purpose of calculating pass-by trips. Pass-by trips are estimated at 458 during the
afternoon peak-hour. This represents 19.6% of the retail/restaurant trip generation, less internal
capture. A summary of estimated pass-by trips by land use is pr~nted in Table 9.
4.3 Mode Split
No reduction in vehicle trip generation will be assumed for transit use in this analysis.
Monitoring/Modeling Methodology
Oviedo Marketplace
tf3
Page 14
Table 5
TRlP GENERATION FORMULAS
Oviedo Marketplace
0=-
ITE
Land Use Code Formula Direction
Showroom
Daily 150 T - 4.96(KSF) - -
PM 150 10(1) - 0.754 Ln(KSF) + 0.826 24% in
Single Family
Daily 210 10(1) - 0.920 1o(KSF) + 2.707 - -
PM 210 10(1) = 0.901 1o(KSF) + 0.527 64% in
Hospital
Daily 610 T = 7.381 (Beds) + 1718.324 - -
PM 610 T = 1.22(Beds) 34% in
Clinic
Dailv 630 T - 51.g-(K.SF) - -
PM 630 T - 5. 18(KSF) 50% in
Office
Daily 710 10(1) - 0.768 1o(KSF) + 3.654 - -
PM 710 T = 1. 121(KSF) + 79.295 17% in
Medical Office
Dailv 720 T - 40.892(KSF) - 214.970 - -
PM 720 10(1) = 0.921 1o(KSF) + 1.476 27% in
Target Wlth Garden Center
Daily 8151817 T = 54. 12(KSF) - -
PM (1) T - 3. 12(KSF) 53% in
Retail
Daily 820 Lo(l) - 0.643 1o(KSF) +5.866 - -
PM 820 Lo(1) - 0.660 Ln(KSF) + 3.403 48% in
Quality Sit-Down Restamant
Daily 831 T - 89.98(KSF) - -
PM 831 T -7.49(KSF) 67% in
. High-Turnover Restamant
Daily 832 T = 130.34(KSF) - -
PM 832 T - 10.86(KSF) 60% in
Fast Food Restamant
Daily 834 T -496.12(KSF) - -
PM 834 T = 33.48(KSF) 52%m
Chilis
TIaily 832 T = 130.34(KSF) --
PM (1) T - 11.97(KSF) 64% in
Fazolis
Daily 832 T = 130.34(KSF) - -
PM (1) T -17.78lKSF) 62!Yo .m
Steak-n-Sbake
Daily 832 T - 130.34(KSF) - -
PM (1) T = (KSF) 56% in
WeUness Center
Daily 493 T = 43.00 - -
PM (1) T = 4.17 56% in
Regal Theater
Daily 444 T - 153.33(Screen) - -
PM (I) T = 7.27(Screcn) 38%m
Convemence MarKet wI gas
Daily 853 T = 845~(KSF) - -
PM 853 T = 6O.61(KSF) 50%m
Funeral Home
Daily (2) T = 9.11(KSF) - -
PM (2) T = o.66lKSF1 54% in
.
,.
.
(1) Trip geacratioa for the PM peak-hour for Target with GardcD Ccutt:r. Chills. Fazo1is. Steak-o-Sbw. Regal 'Ibealcr and
the Wei1Dess Ccutt:r was c:stimaud OIl sum:ys coaducted at the Oviedo Markdp\a.ce during JUDe and July 1998. Daily
trip gencnlioa was c:stimatccl using the 1TE Trip OeDcntion Report. Sill2h Editioa. Target with GarcIcn Ca1Ierwas based
on lTE codes 81S and 817.
(2) Trip pcration for the f\mera1 home was assumed to be very similar to a church. 1heref'ore. the 1TE trip
gcner:Uion raICS for a cburcb were used.. .
Source: JTE Trip Generation Report. SizZh Edition. I997 \.f 'f
Glamn$! Jackson Kercher Anglin Lope: Rinehart. Inc.
.
-
Table 6
.
TRIP GENERATION SURVEYS
Oviedo Marketplace
Land Use
Fazolis Restaurant
Survey Square . PM Peak-Hour Traffic PM Peak-Hour Percent
Date Feet In Out Total Rate Per KSF Inbound
6-23-98 3,206 40 26 66 20.59 61%
6-24-98 3,206 26 15 41 12.79 63%
6-25-98 3,206 40 24 64 19.96 63%
A vetlllle 3,206 35 22 57 17.78 62%
Land Use
Chilis Re~rant
Survey Square PM Peak-Hour Traffic PM Peak-Hour Percent
Date Feet In Out Total Rate Per KSF Inbound
6-23-98 5,683 35 28 63 11.09 56%
6-24-98 5,683 46 23 69 12.14 67%
6-25-98 5,683 50 20 70 12.32 71%
A vetlllle 5,683 44 24 68 11.97 64%
Land Use
Wellness Centtr
.
Survey Square PM Peak-Hour Traffic PM Peak-Hour Percent
Date Feet In Out Total Rate Per KSF Inbound
6-23-98 39,000 96 72 .168 4.31 57%
6-24-98 39,000 97 78 175 4.49 55%
6-25-98 39,000 80 65 145 3.72 55%
Avet'lll!:e 39,000 91 72 163 4.17 56%
Land Use Target and Garden Center
Survey Square PM Peak-Hour Traffic PM Peak-Hour Percent
Date Feet In Out Total Rate Per KSF Inbound
6-23-98 128,634 201 198 399 3.10 500/.
6-24-98 128,634 215 177 392 3.05 55%
6-25-98 128,634 220 193 413 3.21 53%
A VCl'll$l:e 128.634 212 189 401 3.12 53%
Land Use Steak-n-Shake
Survey . Square PM Peak-Hour Traffic PM Peak-Hour Percent
Date Feet In Out Total Rate Per KSF Inbound
6-23-98 3,508 25 21 46 13.11 54%
6-24-98 3,508 22. 19 41 11.69 54%
6-25-98 3,508 39 26 65 18.53 600/0
A verasre 3.508 29 22 51 14.44 57"/0
Land Use Regal Theater
.
~ey PM Peak-Hour Traffic: PM Peak-Hour Percent
Date ScreeDll In Out Total Rate Per KSF Inbound
07-09-98 22 50 III 161 7.32 31%
07-15-98 22 60 138 198 9.00 30%
07-28-98 22 55 87 142 6.45 39%
07-29-98 22 64 57 121 5.50 53%
07-30-98 22 71 105 176 8.00 40%
A venute 22 60 100 160 7.27 38%
Source:
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
~S'
Table 7
SUMMARY OF DAILY AND PM PEAK-HOUR TRIP GENERATION, YEAR 1001
Oviedo Marketplace
Daily l>aiIy PMPeak.Hour .
Land Use Parcel ITE Intensity Trill Ends Rate Totlll Rate In Out
Phase la & Ib - Approved
Relllil 18 820 10,000 GLA 1,551 lSS.l 137 13.7 66 71
Relllil 19 820 10,000 GLA 1,551 155.1 137 13.7 66 71
Convemence Wllh gas 20 853 2,720 GFA 2,300 845.6 170 62.5 85 85
Chills 21A (1) 5,683 OF A 741 130.3 -68 1~0 42 26
Tanzet Wllh Garden Center 21B (1) 128,634 GLA 6,932 -53.9 401 3.1 213 188
Wellness Center 22 (1) 39,000 OFA 1,677 43.0 163 4.2 91 72
Retail 23 820 12,205 OLA 1,763 144.4 157 12.9 75 82
Stcak-o-Shake 24 (1) 3,508 0 A 457 130.3 51 14.5 29 22
F azlills 25 (1) 3,206 0 A 418 130.3 57 17.8 35 22
Borders Books -26 814 25,040 0 A 1,018 40.7 123 4.9 70 53
Jared Jewelers - 26 814 5,700 OFA 232 40.7 28 4.9 16 12
Quality Restaurant 28 831 11,200 GLA 1,007 90.0 84 7.~ 56 28
Family Funeral Care 29 (2) 8,682 OFA 79 9.1 6 0.7 3 3
High Turnover RestaUI'llDt 30 832 7,000 OFA 912 130.3 76 10.9 46 30
Retail 31 820 15,000 OLA 2,013 134.2 180 12.0 86 94
Quality t 32 1131 6,700 OrA 603 90.0 50 7.5 34 f6
Phase 2 - Approved
Regional Shoppmg Center 12 820 1,025,500 OLA 30,451 29.7 2,918 2.8 1,401 1,517
MOVIe Thealer 12 (5) 22 Scr. 3,373 153.3 160 7.3 61 99
Retail 16 820 30,000 OLA 3,143 104.8 m 9~S 136 148
Medical Campus - Retail 17 820 10,000 OI..A 1,551 r55.1 137 13.7 66 71
Medical Camllus - Medlc:a1 Ottlce Z7 720 40,139 OFA 1,426 35.5 131 3.3 35 96
Medic:a1 Campus - Medic:a1 Office -1:/ 720 25,000 OFA 807 32.3 85 3.4 23 -62
Medic:al Campus - D1amostlc Cenll:r T1 (3) 12.000 OFA 377 3U 62 -S.2 2:> 37
Medlc:al Campus - Urgent Care Cenll:r 27 (3) 5.981 OFA 188 31.5 31 5.2 13 18
Medical Campus - Ambulatory Surgery Center Z7 (3) 12,000 OFA 377 31.5 62 5.2 25 37
Hi2h Turnover t 35 832 7;Oon OrA 912 130.3 76 10.9 46 30
High Turnover Restaurant 35 832 5,600 OFA 730 130.3 61 10.9 36 25
High Turnover Restaurant 35 1132 3,200 OFA 417 130.3 35 10.9 21 14 .
Duality Restaurant 35 831 7,000 OrA 630 90.0 52 7.4 35 17
Quality t 35 831 6,400 OFA 576 90.0 48 7.5 32 f6
estaurant :3, 831 7,300 OFA 657 90.0 55 7.5 37 18
Retail 35 820 13,~00 GLA U81 139.3 167 12.4 80 87
PROPOSED (phase 3)
Retail 13 820 180,000 -m:A 9,947 ,S.3 -926 5.1 444 482
High Turnover Resla11rlU1t 13 832 10,000 OFA 1,303 130.3 109 10.9 65 44
High Turnover Restaurant 13 832 10,000 OFA 1,303 130.3 1 10.9 65 44
Retail 14 820 160,000 -GLA 9,222 57.6 85 5.4 411 44,
Me 1c:a1 campus - Medical Ottice 15 720 59,000 OFA 2,198 37.2 1 3.2 51 130
Me lcal CamJIUS - Hospttal Z7 610 120 Beds 2,6(14 21.7 1 1.2 50 96
Off I:CIShowroom 34 (4) 60,000 ULA lit! 14.4 13 2.3 26 112
Smg e Family ResIdential 36 210 4DU 4 13.4 I 1.5 4 2
~oti1 98,244 8,729 - 4,202. 4,5Z7
lUre ,448 480 240 240
~. II Pass-By ,634 458 229 229
liNe! EDema! It 162 7.791 3,733 4.058
(If A. gross Door area
GLA - gross Icaoblc ceo
(I) Trip sc==on for the PM peaIt-ltour far Chilis. Famlis, Stalt-n-ShW.Tcjp:t with G8rcIcn CaIIcr and !be WcIInas CaIIcr- eslimalcd t.scclllll
IlII'IeYS CClllIIudcd lit the Oviedo M8rkclp1ace during JIIIlC 1m. o.iIy trip gmcntian is t.scclllll IIE_
(2) Trip SC==OII far the FuncnI Hame ... -=cd to be 'Iffl'/ aimiIIIr to. CI\IIIdI, tba'efc:R.!be lIE trip gmcntian nlCI
far a c:Iwrch were used
~~ ~:::r!be Diapastic Center, Urgent C8rc Center IIId AaIbuI8toIy SIIlFY Center - eaam.r= usiDs the cIiDic_
4 _ calc:Wmd lit 30"10 oflice IIId 70% ~
(5) Trip pncnliOll for !be Mtrrio 'l'l=Ccr (96.986 aquae feet) is t.sccl 011 surwya CClllIIudcd during July 1m IIId is baed an n --
$Muct6: rrE Trip o-mtUm 1lqort, Siz1h EdilU1rI. 1991
Glatting Jt:d=tt K6rdNr Anglin 1Apc RiM#rtl7t.lnc.
.
4(.
.
'Tab.
;1
. 1
I]
.
'SUMMARY OF PM PEAK-HOUR INTERNAL CAPTURE, YEAR 2001
Oviedo Marketplace
Regional.
Shopping Movie Medical
Fromtro Center Theater Hospital Office Retail . Restaurant Total
Regional Shoppine Center 0 20 16 8 14 58 116
Movie Theater 20 0 .0 0 20 20 60
Hospital 16 0 0 40 2 14 72
Medical Office 8 0 40 0 4 10 62
Retail 14 20 2 4 0 14 54
Restaurant 58 20 14 10 14 , 0 116
Total 116 60 72 - 62 54 116 480
Source: Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
.(
.J
I .
. ,I
Table 9
SUMMARY OF PASS-BY ESTIMATES, YEAR 2001
Oviedo Marketplace
.c.
~
Daily Daily PM PH PM PH
Land Use Parcel Intensity Pass-By % Trip Ends Pass-By Trip Ends Pass-By
Retail 18 10,000 SF 15% 1,551 233 137 21
Retail 19 10,000 SF 15% 1,551 233 137 21
TafJ~et with Garden Center 21B 128,634 SF 15% 6,962 1,044 401 60
Convenience Market 20 2,720 SF 45% 2,300 1,035 170 71
Chilis 21A 5,683 SF 20% 741 148 68 14
Retail 23 12,205 SF 15% 1,763 264 1 157 24
Steak-n-Shake 24 3,508 SF 20% 457 91 51 10
Fazolis 25 3,206 SF 20% 418 84 35 7
Hie.h Turnover Restaurant 28 7,700 SF 20% 1,007 201 83 17
Retail 30 7,000 SF 15% 912 137 119 18
Retail 31 15,000 SF 15% 2,013 302 180 27
Retail 32 6,700 SF 15% 603 90 50 8
Total 20,278 3,863 1,588 304
Retail 16 30,000 SF 15% 3,143 471 284 43
Retail 17 10,000 SF 15% 1,551 233 137 21
Retail 35 13,500 SF 15% 1,881 282 167 25
High Turnover Restaurant 35 7,000 SF 20% 912 182 76 15
Hie.h Turnover Restaurant 35 5,600 SF 20% 730 146 61 12
High Turnover Restaurant 35 3,200 SF 20% 417 83 35 7
Quality Restaurant 35 7,000 SF 20% 630 126 52 10
Qualitv Restaurant 35 6,400 SF 20% 576 1I5 48 10
Quality Restaurant 35 7,300 SF 20% 657 131 55 11
Total 10,497 1,771 915 . 154
Total Pass-By 5.634 2503 458
Soltrcs: G/atting Jackson Kerclrer Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
ITE Trip Generation Report, Fifth Edition, 1991
Seminole Coltnty Road Impact Fss.J 1990 Updats
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
[C
GLATTING
JACKSON
KERCHER
ANGLIN
LOPEZ
RINEHART
4.4 Distribution
The distribution of external PM peak-hour trip ends is based on surveys conducted at the site over a
three-day period. Projected distribution of project traffic is shown on Figure 6. A copy of the survey
questionnaire is included at the end of this letter.
5.0 EV ALVA nON
The evaluation of the existing and proposed land uses will be conducted for Year 2001 and will be
based on the adequate facilities provisions of the Oviedo Marketplace Development Order, the
Seminole County Comprehensive Plan, the Seminole County Land Development Code, the Oviedo
Comprehensive Plan, and the Oviedo Land Development Code. Where conflicts may exist, the Oviedo
Marketplace Development Order shall prevail.
The Development Order provides that development of Oviedo Marketplace may proceed intO such
ponions of the next phase of development if monitoring/modeling indicates that no significant and
adverse impacts exist, or mitigation measures and/or improvements are secured and committed to occur
during the next stage of development.
The Development Order defines adversity as below level of service standard contained in the
comprehensive plan of the jurisdiction in which the roadway segment is located and significance as
those roadway segments where the project contributes five percent (5 %) or greater to the adopted LOS
service volume of the facility.
System traffic forecasts will be prepared using the adopted OUATS model. Socioeconomic data for
year 2001 will be derived from a straight-line interpolation of the 1990 and 2020 OUATS data. The
results of the model output will be reviewed for reasonableness.
The evaluation of urban arterials will be based on a staged analysis. The initial analysis Will be done
using service volumes contained in local comprehensive plans. Based on the results of the initial
analysis, a more detailed analysis using ART-TAB, ART-PLAN or HCM arterial analysis may be
performed.
~1
Monitoring/Modeling Methodology
Oviedo Marketplace
Page 20
I .
VJ
o
.
-
SEMlliOLB COUNTY
_.-
ORANOECOUNTY
Ie ~viedoMarketpla(e
.
7.'%
HlldleII Hammock Rd.
~
1ft
-
~~
,..~
-
o.!~
.j
~ . !;
~
.)
5
. Figure 6
Project Tralflc Dlstrlbutlin
m Scale In Miles .
NordI ~ 10
-
.
.
.
[C
GLATTING
JACKSON
KERCHER
ANGLIN
LOPEZ
RINEHART
Please call me if you have any questions/comments on the above methodology. We look forward to
working with you on this project.
Sincerely,
JIM/ ae
C' Joseph Duda, The Viera Company
Tom Babcock. The Viera Company
Steve Johnson, The Viera Company
Jay Decator, The Viera Company
Mary Ellen McKibben, The Viera Company
Mike Bryant, The Rouse. Company
Hal Kantor, LDDKR
Brian Cobb, City of Oviedo
Sudarshana Bhat, SAlC
Dick Thomas, Seminole County
Antoine Khoury, Seminole County
Tom Grimms, City of Winter Springs
David Marsh, FDOT
Linda Dozier, Genesis Group
Gary HutIIIlann, Ghyabi & Lassiter & Associates
Rob Gregg, LYNX
David Heath, Orange County
Ruby Rozier, Orange County
Jim Krauss, Winter Park Hospital
Jack Glatting, Glatting Jackson
Carey Hayo, Glatting Jackson
Brian McHugh, Glatting Jackson
Tim Jackson, Glatting Jackson
..>1
Monitoring/Modeling Methodology
("h,;prln M!'lrvpmbrf>
Page 22
Page 52
ROADWAYSER~CEVOLUMffiS
Traffic Impact Study
Oviedo Marketplace
August 20, 1999
.
.
.
-
Page 53
Table A-I
ROADWAY SERVICE VOLUMES
OYiedo Marketplace
E+C
Lanes! Accept-
Segment Facility able
Roadwav From - To Tvoe LOS LOS A LOSB LOSC LOSD LOSE
Scmoran Boulevard (SR4436) SRSO - Univenity Blvd. 6 ART D - . 1890 2640 2780 2780
Blvd. - Aloma Ave. 6 ART D - . 1890 2640 2780 2780
Aloma Ave. - Howell Branch Rd. 6 ART D - - 1890 2640 2780 2780
Howell Bnmch Rd. . Lakemont Ave. 6 ART D - - 1890 2640 2780 2780
Lakcmont Ave. . Red Bwr Lake Rd. 6 ART D - . 1890 2640 2780 2780
Red BUll Lake Rd. . US 17-92 6 ART D - - 1890 2640 2780 2780
US 17-92. CR 427 6 ART D - - 1890 2640 2780 2780
Goldenrod Road -(SR 551) SR 50 - Univenitv Blvd. 4 ART E - - 1240 1750 1850 1850
University Blvd. - Aloma Ave. 4 ART E - - 990 1320 1670 2200
Dodd Road Howell Bnmch Rd. . Dike Rd. 4COL E - - 990 1320 1670 2200
Dike Rd. - Rl:d BUll Lake Rd. 4COL E - - 990 1320 1670 2200
TuskawiUa Road . Aloma Ave. - Dike Rd. 4 ART E - - 990 1320 1670 2200
Dike Rd. . Rl:d BUll Lake Rd. 6 ART E - - 1430 1980 2510 3300
Red BUll Lake Rd. - Lake Dr. 4 ART E - . 990 1320 1670 2200
Lake Dr. . Wmter SIJrin8ll Blvd. 4 ART E - - 990 1320 1670 2200
Wmtcr SorinllS Blvd. - SR 434 4 ART E - - 990 1320 1670 2200
GrccneWav SR 50 - University Blvd. 4 F(2) D 1090 1710 2570 3270 3900
Universitv Blvd. . Aloma Ave. 4 F(2) D 1090 1710 2570 3270 3900
Aloma Ave. . Red BUll Lake Rd. 4 F(2) D 1090 1710 2570 3270 3900
Rl:d BUll Lake Rd. . SR 434 4 F(2) D 1090 1710 2570 3270 3900
SR 434 . Lake Mary Blvd. 4 F(2) D 1090 1710 2570 3270 3900
Dean Road SR SO . University Blvd. 4 ART E - - 1240 1750 1850 1850
Univcrsitv Blvd. - McCulloch Rd. 2 ART E 460 720 980 1280 1710
McCulloch Rd. . Aloma Aveauc 2 ART E 510 S50 S90 670 1000
Rousc Rd. SR SO - Universitv Blvd. 2COL E - - - - 440 7(J) 830
SR 434 SR SO - University Blvd. 6 ART E - - 1890 2640 2780 2780
University Blvd. - Blvd. 6 ART E - - 1890 2640 2780 2780
Blvd. . McCulloch Rd. 6 ART E - - 1890 2640 2780 2780
McCulloch Rd. - CJIapmau Rd. 6 ART E 1300 1810 2330 2690 3100
Rd. . Alafava Woods Blvd. 6 ART E 1300 1810 2330 2690 3100
- Alafava Woods Blvd. - Mitchell Hammock Rd. 6 ART E 1300 1810 2330 2690 3100
Mitchell Hammock Rd. - Aloma Ave. 2 ART D - - S70 820 880 880
Aloma Ave. - GreeucWav 2 ART D - - 570 820 880 880
GrccncWay . Tuakawilla Rd. 4 ART D - - 1240 1750 1850 1850
TlIIkawilla Rd. . SR 419 4 ART E 830 1300 1700 2070 2A8O
SR 419 - US 17-92 4 ART E 830 1300 1700 2070 2A8O
US 17-92 - CR 427 4 ART E 830 1300 1700 2070 2A8O
Lockwood Road McCulloch Rd. - Seminole Cnlek Dr. 4 ART E . - 1240 1750 1850 1850
SemiDole Cn:ck Dr. - Little Ecoa River 4 ART E - - 1240 I7SO 1850 1850
Little EcoD River - Mitchell Hammock Rd. 4 ART E . - 1240 1750 1850 1850
Mitchell Hammock Rd. . SR 419 4 ART E - - 1240 1750 1850 1850
SR 419 - CR 426 2 ART E 460 720 980 1280 1710
McCulloch Road SR 434 . Lockwood Rd. 4 ART D - - 990 1320 1670 2200
Universitv Boulevard SR 436 . Goldauod Rd. 6 ART E - - 1890 2640 2780 2780
Goldeurod Rd. - Ecoa Tr. 6 ART E - - 1890 2640 2780 2780
Ecoa Tr. - GrceDcWav 6 ART E - . 1890 2640 2780 2780
GrceDcWav - Dean Rd. 6 ART E - - 1890 2640 2780 2780
Dean Rd. - Rouse Rd. 6 ART E . - 1890 2640 2780 2780
Rouse Rd. - Alafava Tr. 6 ART E . - 1890 2640 2780 2780
Note: Facility type amd service voll1111CS arc: based 011 the local gova'IIIIlCIIl CCIIIIpfChemive plan of the jurisdiction in which the roadway segment ia located
Acceptable level of service ia based 011 the COIIIpI"dICIIlIivc plan of the coUDty in which the roadway ICgment ia located
Acceptable level of service aud service volllllleS for the FIHS is cstabliahed by the FOOT
Source: GlaIting Jaclaon Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart. Inc.
.
Table A-I (Continued)
ROADWAY SERVICE VOLUMES
Oviedo Marketplace
Page 54
E+C
Lanes! Accept-
Segment Facility able
Roadwav From - To Tvne" WS WSA WSB WSC WSD WSE
A10ma Ave. (SR 426) US 17-92 . Lekemoot Ave. 4 ART E - - 1240 1750 1850 1850
SR 436 - Golde:arod Rd. 4 ART E - - 1240 1750 1850 1850
Goldearod Rd. -Iilnwll Bnmch Rd. 4 ART E - - 1240 1750 1850 1850
Iilnwll Branch Rd. . Tuakawi1Ia Rd. 4 ART E 830 1300 1700 2070 2480
Tuskawil1a Rd. - Grc:eneWay 4 ART E 830 1300 1700 2070 2480
GrecneWay - Dean Rd. 4 ART E 830 1300 1700 2070 2480
Dean Rd. - Chapman Rd. 4 ART E 830 1300 1700 2070 2480
1"'1.-- Rd. - Slavia Rd. 4 ART E 830 1300 1700 2070 2480
Sima Rd. - Mitchell Hammock Rd. 4 ART E 830 1300 1700 2070 2480
Mitchell Hammock Rd. - Oviedo MarlcCtDiacc Bi 4 ART D - - 1240 1750 1850 1850
Oviedo Marketplace Blvd. . W'mtcr SDrinI!S Blvd 4 ART D - - 1240 1750 1850 1850
W. Broadwav SL (SR 426) W'mter Springs Blvd. . Lake JesIUD Dr. 2 ART D - - 570 820 880 880
Lake JCIlllUD Dr. - SR 434 2 ART D - . 570 820 880 880
Geneva Dr. (CR 426) CR 419 . Lockwood Rd. 2COL E 510 550 590 670 1000
Lockwood Rd. - Seminole Woods Blvd. 2COL 0 510 550 590 670 1000
Horatio Avenue US 17-92- Thistle Lu. 4 ART D . . 1240 1750 1850 1850
Howell Branch Thistle Lu. . Lake Howell Rd. 4 ART D . - 1240 1750 1850 1850
Lake Howell Rd. - SR 436 4 ART D - . 1240 1750 1850 1850
SR 436 . Dike Rd. 4 ART D+20% - - 1490 2100 2220 2220
Dike Rd. - Dodd Rd. 4 ART D+20% - - 1490 2100 2220 2220
Dodd Rd. - A10ma Ave. 4 ART D+20% - - 1490 2100 2220 2220
Dike Road Howell Branch Rd. - Dodd Rd 2 ART E 510 550 590 670 1000
Dodd Rd. - Tuskawilla Rd. 2 ART E 510 550 590 670 . 1000
SIavia Road Red BUll Lake Rd. - A10ma Ave. 2 ART E 510 550 590 670 1000
Red Bug Lake Road SR 436 - W'mtcr Park Rd. 6 ART E - . 1430 1980 2510 3300
W'mter Park Rd. - Eagle Circle 6 ART E - . 1430 1980 2510 3300
E821e Circle - Noddinlt PiDcs Way 4 ART E . . 990 1320 1670 2200 .
NoddiDg Pines Way - Dodd Rd. 4 ART E . . 990 1320 1670 2200
Dodd Rd. - Tusbwilla Rd. 4 ART E - . 990 1320 1670 2200
TlI8kawilla Rd. . SUII Dr. 6 ART E . . 1430 1980 2510 3300
SUII Dr. - CitnIa Rd. 6 ART E - - 1430 1980 2510 3300
CitnIa Rd. - S1avia Rd. 6 ART E . . 1430 1980 2510 3300
Sima Rd. - Site Eatnmcc (BOUth) 6 ART E . . 1430 1980 2510 3300
Site Eatnmcc (BOUth) - DcM:ra Rd. tiART E . - 1430 1980 2510 3300
Dovaa Rd. - Oviedo Marketplace Blvd. 6 ART E - - 1430 1980 2510 3300
Oviedo Markcto1acc Blvd. - Tanret Entrance 6 ART E - - 1430 1980 2510 3300
TSIlICt Eatnmcc - Grc:eneWav 6 ART E . - 1430 1980 2510 3300
Grc:eneWav. A10ma Ave. 6 ART E - . 1430 1980 2510 3300
Mitchell Hammock Road A10ma Ave. - SR 434 4 ART E . - 1240 1750 1850 1850
SR 434 - Lockwood Rd. 4 ART E . - 1240 1750 1850 1850
Rd. SR 426 - SR 434 4COL E . - .1240 1750 1850 1850
Seminola Boulevard US 17-92 - Lake Dr. 4COL D - . 990 1320 1670 2200
Lake Drive ScmiDoIa Blvd. - TlISbwilla Rd. 4COL E . . 990 1320 1670 2200
CR419 SR 434 - Lockwood Rd. 2COL E 510 550 590 670 1000
Lockwood Rd. - Second SL 4COL E - - 1240 1750 1850 1850
WinIcr SDimI!S Boulevard SR426 - Northcm Way 4COL D . - - - 1030 1640 1750
Northern Way - Northern Way 2COL D - . - - 440 760 830
Northern Way - Tuakawi1Ia Rd. 2COL D - . - - 440 760 830
Northern Wav South W'mter Smmml Blvd. - W'mt.cr S.......- Blvd. 2COL D - . - - 440 760 830
.
.
Note: Facility type lIIId servicc vollllDcs III'C based on the local govemment comprchcasive plaa of the jurisdiction in which the roadway 1Cgmc:ut is 10C8Icd
Acceptable level of service is baaed on the comprchcaaive plaa of the county in which tbc roadway acgmcut is 10C8Icd
hccptable level of service lIIId service vollllDC8 for the FIHS is catablisbcd by the FOOT
Source: Glarting JacJaon Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
.
-
.
.
.
Page 55
RAMP SERVICE VOLUMES
Traffic Impact Study
Oviedo Marketplace
August 3,1999
Page 56
Table A-2
PEAK-HOUR RAMP SERVICE VOLUMES
.
A 600
b b b
B 900 900
b b
C 1,100 1,250 1,300
b
D 1,200 1,350 1,550 1,600
E 1,250 1,450 1,600 1,650 1,700
F Widely Variable
a For two-lane ramps, multiply the values in the table by:
1.7 for ~20 mph
1.8 for 21-30 mph
1.9 for 31-40 mph
2.0 for ~41 mph
.
b Level of service not attainable due to restricted design speed.
Source: Highway Capacity Manual
Traffic Impact Study
Oviedo Marketplace
August 3, 1999
.
-
.
.
.
Page 57
INTERSECTION ANALYSES, YEAR 1999
Traffic Impact Study
Oviedo MarKetplace
August 3,1999
Page 58
INDEX TO INTERSECTIONS
No. Intersection Paee .
1 Red Bug Lake Road @ SR436 59
2 Red Bug Lake Road @ Dodd Road 60
3 . Red Bug Lake Road @ Tuskawilla Road 61
4 Red Bug Lake Road @ Sun Drive 62
5 Red Bug Lake Road @ Citrus Road 63
6 Red Bug Lake Road @ Slavia Road 64-
7 Red Bug Lake Roa4 @ Dovera Road 65
8 Red Bug Lake Road @ Oviedo Marketplace Blvd. 66
9 Red Bug Lake Road @ GreeneWay ramps west 67
10 Red Bug Lake Road @ GreeneWay ramps east 68
11 Red Bug Lake Road @ SR426 69
12 Mitchell Hammock Road @ Lockwood Boulevard 70
13 Tuskawilla Road @ Dike Road 71
14 Tuskawilla Road @ Lake Drive 72
15 Tuskawilla Road @ Winter Springs Boulevard 73
16 SR434 @ Chapman Road 74
17 SR434 @ Alafaya Woods Boulevard 75
18 SR434 @ Mitchell Hammock Road 76
19 SR434 @ SR426 77 .
20 SR434 @ GreeneWay ramps east 78
21 SR434 @ GreeneWay ramps west 79
22 SR434 @ Tuskawilla Road 80
23 SR434 @ SR419 81
24 SR426 @ Tuskawilla Road 82
25 SR426 @ GreeneWay ramps west 83
26 SR426 @ GreeneWay ramps east 84
27 SR426 @ Dean Road 85
28 SR426 @ Chapman Road 86
29 SR426 @ Oviedo Marketplace Boulevard 87
30 SR426 @ Winter Springs Boulevard 88
31 SR426 @ Lake Jessup Avenue 89
32 Lockwood Boulevard @ CR419 90
Traffic Impact Study
Oviedo Marketplace
August 3,1999
.
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 07-23-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
.
Streets: (E-W) Red Bug Lake Road
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 1999
(N-S) SR436
File Name: OM0199.HC9
11-24-98 pm
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 0 0 1 2 0 2 1 3 0 2 3 1
Volumes 28 731 772 12 1784 1207 1970 11
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left NB Left *
Thru Thru *
Right * Right
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *.
Thru Thru * *
Right * Right * *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right * *
SB Right * WB Right * *
Green 25.0A Green 55.0A 45.0A
. Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0
Cycle Length: 139 sees Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB R 1583 1583 0.018 1.000 0.0 A 0.0 A
WE L 687 3539 1.152 0.194 * * * *
R 3167 3167 0.290 1.000 0.0 A
NB L 77 227 0.169 0.338 21.0 C * *
T 1889 5588 1.093 0.338 * *
SB L 1426 3539 0.918 0.403 32.5 D 14.6 B
T 4261 5588 0.535 0.763 4.4 A
R 1583 1583 0.008 1.000 0.0 A
Intersection Delay = * ( sec/veh) Intersection LOS = *
(g/C) * (V/c) is greater than one. Calculation of D1 is infeasible.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
~-e;
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 07-23-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
Streets: (E-W) Red Bug Lake Road
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 1999
(N-S) Dodd Road
File Name: OM0299.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
=======================================================================
Eastbound . Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 2. 1
Volumes 158 1600 208 67 992 288 200 155 171 140 129 106
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
---------------------~-------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left. *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WE Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right * * EB Right * *
SB Right * .* WE Right * *
Green 18.0A 78.0A Green 18.0A 20.0A
. Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 .
Cycle Length: 154 sees Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lane Group:
Mvrnts Cap
Intersection Performance Summary
Adj Sat v/c g/C
Flow Ratio Ratio Delay
LOS
Approach:
Delay LOS
EB L 230 1770 0.722 0.130 48.7 E 26.2 D
T 1935 3725 . 0.914 0.519 27.1 D
R 1316 1583 0.166 0.831 1.7 A
WE L 460 3539 0.159 0.130 38.5 D 14.6 B
T 1935 3725 0.566 0.519 16.6 C
R 1316 1583 0.230 0.831 1.8 A
NB L 460 3539 0.472 0.130 40.7 E 28.9 D
T 266 1863 0.612 0.143 43.0 E
R 1285 1583 0.140 0.812 2.0 A
SB L 460 3539 .0.329 0.130 39.5 D 28.6 D
T 532 3725 0.269 0.143 38.1 D
R 1285 1583 0.087 0.812 1.9 A
Intersection Delay = 23.0 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 see Critical v/c(x) = 0.778
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
(gd
-
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 07-23-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart,. Inc.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(N-S) Tuskawilla Road
File Name: OM0399.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
Streets: (E-W) Red Bug Lake Rd.
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 1999
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 3 1 2 3. 1
Volumes 375 1358 243 348 852 250 278 644 413 330 483 180
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 .3.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right. * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right * * EB Right * *
SB Right * * WB Right * *
.. Green 24.0A 64.0A Green 24.0A 24.0A
Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0
Cycle Length: 156 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lane Group:
Mvrnts Cap
Intersection Performance Summary
Adj Sat v/c g/C
Flow Ratio Ratio Delay
LOS
Approach:
Delay LOS
EB L 590 3539 0.690 0.167 41.9 E 34.3 D
T 1576 3725 0.952 0.423 37.7 D
R. 1258 1583 0.203 0.795 2.5 A
WB L 590 3539 0.639 0.167 40.8 E 23.8 C
T 1576 3725 0.598 0.423 22.9 C
R 1258 1583 0.209 0.795 2:6 A
NB L 590 3539 0.512 0.167 38.9 D 31.1 D
T 931 5588 0.801 0.167 43.9 E
R 1228 1583 0.354 0.776 3.6 A
SB L 590 3539 0.605 0.167 40.2 E 33.6 D
T 931 5588 0.600 0.167 39.7 D
R 1228 1583 0.154 0.776 2.9 A
Intersection Delay = 30.8 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.815
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
C,,(
HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 07-23-1999
Glatting Jackson Kerche.r Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
(N-S) Sun Drive
File Name: OM0499.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
Streets: (E-W) Red Bug Lake Road
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 1999
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
L T R
Westbound
L T R
Northbound
L T R
Southbound
L T R
--~-
No. Lanes
Volumes
Lane W (ft)
RTOR Vols
Lost Time
1 3
285 1733
12.0 12.0
1
52
12.0
o
3.00
1 3
17 1328
12.0 12.0
1
62
12.0
o
3.00
1 1
32 18
12.0 12.0
1 1. < 1
47 8 150
12.0 12.0 12.0
o 0
3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
< 0
27
3.00 3.00
3.00 3.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right * *
SB Right WB Right * *
Green 36.0A 71.0A Green 14 . OA 1 7 . OA
Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 .
Cycle Length: 158 sees Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 426 1770 0.705 0.241 39.0 D 25.6 D
T 2582 5588 0.777 0.462 24.1 C
R 1142 1583 0.048 0.722 4.1 A
WB L 426 1770 0.042 0.241 29.7 D 20.1 C
T 2582 5588 0.596 0.462 20.7 C
R 1142 1583 0.057 0.722 4.1 A
NB L 179 1770 0.190 0.101 42.1 E 42.4 E
TR 172 1696 0.274 0.101 42.6 E
SB L 213 1770 0.230 0.120 40.7 E 42.2 E
TR 194 1611 0.423 0.120 42.5 E
R 190 1583 0.441 0.120 42.8 E
. Intersection Delay = 24.7 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 see Critical v/c(x) = 0.659
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
~"2.-
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 07-23-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
.
Streets: (E-W) Red Bug Lake Road
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 1999
(N-S) Citrus Road
File Name: OM0599.HC9
11-24-98 pm
=======================================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
--- - -- -- ----
No. Lanes 1 3 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 > 1 < 0
Volumes 227 1178 1203 235 90 1 136
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
---------------------.--------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left
Thru * * Thru
Right Right
Peds Peds
WB Left SB Left * *
Thru * Thru * *
Right * Right * *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right *
SB Right WB Right * *
Green 26.0A '71.0A Green 20.0A 17.0A
. Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0
Cycle Length: 153 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 312 1770 0.765 0.176 46.1 E 12.8 B
T 3762 5588 0.363 0.673 7.0 B
WB T 2666 5588 0.522 0.477 18.2 C 15.8 C
R 1242 1583 0.199 0.784 2.7 A
SB LTR 430 1496 0.556 0.288 31.1 D 31.1 D
Intersection Delay = 15.5 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.578
.
(p~
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 07-23-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
Streets: (E-W) Red Bug Lake Road
Analyst: JJM
Area Type:. Other
Comment: Year 1999
(N-S) Slavia Road
File Name: OM0699.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L .T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 0 3 1 1 3 0 2 0 1 0 0 0
Volumes 1326 288 9 1155 294 34
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
-,
---------------------.--------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left NB Left *
Thru * Thru
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WE Left * SB Left
Thru * Thru
Right Right
Peds Peds
NB Right * EB Right *
SB Right WE Right
Green 99.0A Green 20 . OA
Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 .
Cycle Length: 129 sees phase combination order: #1 #5
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB T 4375 5588 0.351 0.783 2.7 A 2.3 A
R 1583 1583 0.191 1.000 0.0 A
WE L 129 165 0.070 0.783 2.1 A 2.6 A
T 4375 5588 0.306 0.783 2.6 A
NB L 604 3539 0.527 0.171 32.2 D 28.9 D
R 1583 1583 0.023 1.000 0.0 A
Intersection Delay = 5.1 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 see Critical v/c(x) = 0.383
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Lt{
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 07-23-2999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
.
Streets: (E-W) Red Bug Lake Road
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 1999
(N-S) Dovera Road
File Name: OM0799.HC9
11-24-98 pm
=======================================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 2 3 2 1 3 2 1 1 1 2 l 1
Volumes 73 1112 65 16 1082 57 20 2 24 84 2 38
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 22.0 12.0 12.0 22.0 12.0 22.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
--------------------~--------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * * Thru *
Right * * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * * Thru *
Right * * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right * * * EB Right * *
SB Right * * * WB Right * *
Green 25.0A 20.0A 47.0A Green. 20.0A 30.0P
. Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0
Cycle Length: 15-S sees Phase combination order: #1 #2 #3 #5 #6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lane Group:
Mvmts Cap
Intersection Performance Summary
Adj Sat vie glC
Flow Ratio Ratio Delay
LOS
Approach:
Delay LOS
EB L 594 3539 0.133 0.268 35.5 D 16.5 C
T 2812 5588 0.458 0.503 16.1 C
R 2379 2583 0.049 0.871 0.9 A
WB L 226 1770 0.135 0.072 43.7 E 22.3 C
T 2271 5588 0.552 0.406 23.0 C
R 1256 1583 0.048 0.794 2.2 A
NB L 251 1770 0.084 0.142 37.3 D 29.5 C
T 264 1863 0.008 0.142 36.9 D
R 1195 1583 0.021 0.755 3.1 A
SB L 731 3539 0.125 0.206 32.4 D 23.2 C
T 385 1863 0.005 0.206 32.6 D
R 1266 1583 0.032 0.800 2.1 A
Intersection Delay = 19.5 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 see Critical v/c(x) = 0.308
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
t,S'"
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 07-23-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
Streets: (E-W) Red Bug Lake Road
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 1999
(N-S) Oviedo Marketplace
File Name: OM0899.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
. -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 2 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 1
Volumes 155 1055 22 83 905 177 14 19 66 245 12 171
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 40 0 45
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left * *
Thru * Thru * *
Right * Right * *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right * *
SB Right * * WB Right * *
Green 28.0A 43.0A Green 25.0A 15.0A
Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 .
Cycle Length: 130 sees Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 790 3539 0.213 0.223 26.6 D 23.5 C
T 1934 5588 0.632 0.346 23.5 C
R 1157 1583 0.020 0.731 3.1 A
WB L 395 1770 0.220 0.223 26.7 D 20.5 C
T 1934 5588 0.542 0.346 22.3 C
R 1157 1583 0.124 0.731 3.4 A
~ NB L 222 1695 0.068 0.131 32.0 D 33.0 D
T 244 1863 0.082 0.131 32.1 D
R 207 1583 0.333 0.131 33.5 D
SB L 1197 3539 0.222 0.362 18.5 C 12.5 B
T 673 1863 0.019 0.362 17.2 C
R 1547 1583 0.086 0.977 0.0 A
Intersection Delay = 21.2 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 see Critical v / c (x) = 0.426
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
G,c;.
-
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 07-23-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Streets: (E-W) Red Bug Lake Road
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 1999
(N-S) GreeneWay west
File Name: OM0999.HC9
11-24-98 pm
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbbund
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 0 3 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 O. 0
Volumes 1301 129 1149 151
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left NB Left
Thru * Thru
Right * Right
Peds Peds
WB Left SB Left *
Thru * Thru
Right Right .
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right *
SB Right WB Right
Green 90.0A Green 20.0A
. Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0
Cycle Length: 120 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB T 4284 5588 0.352 0.767 2.9 A 2.7 A
R 1583 1583 0.086 1.000 0.0 A
WB T 4284 5588 0.310 0.767 2.8 A 2.8 A
SB L 324 1770 0.490 0.183 29.4 D 29.4 D
Intersection Delay = 4.1 sec/veh Intersection LOS = A
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.378
.
~7
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 07-23-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
========================================"===============================
Streets: (E-W) Red Bug Lake Road
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 1999
(N-S) GreeneWay east
File Name: OM1099.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 1 3 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Volumes 81 1371 1348 270
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
---------------------,--------------------------------------------------
Signal .Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB . Left * NB Left *
Thru * * Thru
Right Right
Peds Peds
WB Left. SB Left
Thru * Thru
Right Right
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB. Right * WB Right
Green 30.0A 70.0A Green 15 . OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 .
Cycle Length: 129 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 425 1770 0.200 0.240 25.3 D 3.1 A
T 4592 5588 0.346 0.822 1.9 A
WB T 3119 5588 0.500 0.558 11.4 B 11.4 B
NB L 466 3539 0.628 0.132 36.2 D 36.2 D
Intersection Delay = 9.5 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.441
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
(p~
-
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 07-23-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
.
Streets: (E-W) Red Bug Lake Road
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 1999.
(N-S) SR426
File Name: OMl199.HC9
11-24-98 pm
=======================================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
---- -- --
No. Lanes 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Volumes 452 924 159 150 767 178 182 413 280 231 326 344
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 50 45 50 120
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right * * EB Right * *
SB Right * * WB Right * *
Green 22.0A 39.0A Green 20.0A 30.0A
. Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0
Cycle Length: 130 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 626 3539 0.783 0.177 37.5 D 31. 7 D
T 1175 3725 0.870 0.315 32.3 D
R 1230 1583 0.093 0.777 2.3 A
WB L 313 1770 0.505 0.177 32.4 D 24.7 C
T 1175 3725 0.721 0.315 27.0 D
R 1230 1583 0.114 0.777 2.3 A
NB L 299 1770 0.641 0.169 35.7 D 35.0 D
T 459 1863 0.949 0.246 52.6 E
R 1206 1583 0.201 0.762 2.8 A
SB L 299 1770 0.811 0.169 44.1 E. 28.0 D
T 459 1863 0.748 0.246 33.8 D
R 1206 1583 0.196 0.762 2.8 A
Intersection Delay = 29.9 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.863
--------------------------------------------------------------------.---
.
(;,7
HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 07-23-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
(N-S) Lockwood Blvd.
File Name: OM1299.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
Streets: (E-W) Mitchell Hammock Rd
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 1999
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
L T R
Westbound
L T R
Northbound
L T R
Southbound
L T R
No. Lanes
Volumes
Lane W (ft)
RTOR Vols
Lost Time
o > 1
555 82
12.0
1
480
12.0
160
3.00
1 2 < 0
54 63 18
12.0 12.0
1 2
516 .395
12.0 12.0
1
57
12.0
o
3.00
1 2. < 0
115 230 357
12.0 12.0
o
3.00 3.00 3.00
3.00 3.00
o
3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right * * EB Right * *
SB Right WB Right
Green 25.0A 8.0A Green 40 . OA 25 . OA
Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 .
Cycle Length: 117 sees Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat vie g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB LT 412 1785 1.627 0.231 * * * *
R 1543 1583 0.218 0.974 0.0 A
WB L 151 1770 0.377 0.085 33.4 D 32.9 D
TR 308 3601 0.289 0.085 32.6 D
NB L 620 1770 0.876 0.350 32.4 D 28.1 D
T 860 3725 0.508 0.231 25.8 D
R 907 1583 0.066 0.573 7.2 B
SB L 620 1770 0.195 0.350 17.1 C 30.5 D
TR 781 3385 0.831 0.231 33.0 D
Intersection Delay = * (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = *
(g/C) * (Vie) is greater than one. Calculation of D1 is infeasible.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
7c
-
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 07-23-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
.
Streets: (E-W) Dike Road
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 1999
(N-S) Tuskawilla Road
File Name: OM1399.HC9
11-24-98 pm
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
-- -- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
No. Lanes 1 1 c:: 0 0 > 1 c:: 0 1 2 c:: 0 1 2 1
Volumes 341 1 133 1 1 2 157 1003 2 3 735 243
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 50
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
.-
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left * *
Thru * Thru * *
Right * Right * *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right * WB Right
Green 15.0A Green . 8.0A 18.0A
. Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0
Cycle Length: 55 sees Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 541 1749 0.664 0.309 12.8 B 11.9 B
TR 490 1585 0.288 0.309 9.4 ~
WB LTR 450 1455 0.009 0.309 8.5 B 8.5 B
NB L 425 1770 0.388 0.582 4.6 A 4.6 A
TR 2167 3724 0.513 0.582 4.6 A
SB L 135 373 0.022 0.364 7.3 B 8.1 B
~ T 1355 3725 0.600 0.364 9.7 B
R 1152 1583 0.176 0.727 1.5 A
Intersection Delay = 7.2 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 see Critical v) c (x) = 0.618
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
71
-
HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 07-23-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Streets: (E-W) Lake Drive
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 1999
(N-S) Tuskawilla Road
File Name: OM1499.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
---- -- --
No. Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 < 0
Volumes 223 305 267 736 619 104
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 50 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
~
---------------------~-------------------------------------------------
Phase Combination 1
EB Left
Thru
Right
Peds
WE Left
Thru
Right
Peds
NB Right
SB Right
Green
Yellow/AR
Cycle Length:
2
Signal Operations
3 4
5
*
NB Left
Thru
Right
Peds
SB Left
Thru
Right
Peds
EB Right
WE Right
Green 22.0A 40.0A
Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0
combination order: #1 #5 #6
*
6
*
7
8
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
18.0A
5.0
94 sees
Phase
.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lane Group:
Mvrnts Cap
Intersection Performance Summary
Adj Sat v/c g/C
Flow Ratio Ratio Delay
LOS
Approach:
Delay LOS
EB L 377 1770 0.624 0.213 24.0 C 10.1 B
R 1583 1583 0.203 1.000 0.0 A
NB L 513 1770 0.548 0.723 13.1 B 6.7 B
T 1348 1863 0.575 0.723 4.4 A
SB TR 733 1640 1.038 0.447 52.9 E 52.9 E
Intersection Delay = 22.3 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 see Critical v/c(x) = 0.835
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
71.-
-
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 07-23-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
.
Streets: (E-W) Winter Springs Blvd
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 1999
(N-S) Tuskawilla Road
File Name: OM1599.HC9
11-24-98 pm
=======================================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
---- ---- --- - ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
No. Lanes 1 1 < 0 1 1 < 0 1 1 < 0 1 1 < 0
Volumes 25 26 41 117 49 133 73 455 186 167 489 32
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 40 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
.....
---------------------.--------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left * *
Thru * Thru * *
Right * Right * *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 25.0A 40. OA Green 15.0A 30.0A
. Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0
Cycle. Length: 129 sees Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 357 1770 0.073 0.202 27.0 D 21.7 C
TR 551 1691 0.127 0.326 19.8 C
WE L 357 1770 0.345 0.202 28.8 D 24.4 C
-TR 540 1659 0.355 0.326 21.6 C
NB L 58 233 1.333 0.248 * * * *
TR 445 1795 1.422 0.248 * *
SB L 291 1770 0.605 0.403 21. 7 C 23.3 C
TR 744 1845 0.738 0.403 23.8 C
Intersection Delay = * (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = *
(g/C) * (V Ie) is greater than one. Calculation of D1 is infeasible.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
73
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 07-23-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
Streets: (E-W) Chapman Road
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 1999
(N-S) SR434
File Name: OM1699.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
=======================================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
---- ---- --- - ---- -- -- ---- ----
No. Lanes 1 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 1 1 < 0 1 1 1
Volumes 289 61 466 25 31 22 374 900 23 52 764 129
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12~0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 30
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
---------------------.--------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left * *
Thru * Thru * *
Right * Right * *
Peds Peds
WE Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right * 1< WE Right
Green 15.0A 20 . OA Green 20.0A 29.0A
Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 .
Cycle Length: 104 sees Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 374 1770 0.812 0.212 34.0 D * *
TR 342 1616 1.624 0.212 * *
WE LTR 258 1581 0.317 0.163 25.0 C 25.0 C
NB L 446 1770 0.883 0.538 31.5 D 31.3 D
TR 999 1856 0.972 0.538 31.3 D
SB L 72 240 0.769 0.298 46.4 E * *
T 555 1863 1.448 0.298 * *
R 1111 1583 0.094 0.702 3.2 A
Intersection Delay = * (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = *
(g/C)*(V/c) is greater than one. Calculation of D1 is infeasible.
---------------------------------------~-------------------------------
.
7'f
-
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 07-23-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
.
Streets: (E-W) Alafaya Woods Blvd
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 1999
(N-S) SR434
File Name: OM1799.HC9
11-24-98 pm
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound Westbound Northbound southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
---- ---- ---- ----
No. Lanes 1 1 < 0 0 > 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Volumes 3 1 8 293 2 144 5 788 404 242 700 3
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 120 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
---------------------~--------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left * *
Thru * Thru * *
Right * Right * *
Peds Peds
NB Right * EB Right
SB Right * WB Right
Green 30.0A Green 20.0A 76.0A
. Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0
Cycle Length: 140 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lane Group:
Mvrnts Cap
Intersection Performance Summary
Adj Sat v/c g/C
Flow Ratio Ratio Delay
LOS
Approach:
Delay LOS
EB L 64 278 0.047 0.229 27.2 D 27.1 D
TR 369 1614 0.024 0.229 27.1 D
WB LT 387 1692 0.802 0.229 40.8 E 37.4 D
R 362 1583 0.420 0.229 30.3 D
NB L 127 227 0.040 0.557 9.1 B 14.6 B
T. 1038 1863 0.799 0.557 19.1 C
R 1278 1583 0.234 0.807 2.1 A
SB L 319 1770 0.799 0.729 37.9 D 14.1 B
T 1357 1863 0.543 0.729 5.9 B
R 1583 1583 0.002 1.000 0.0 A
Intersection Delay = 18.5 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.825
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
?s-
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 07-23-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Streets: (E-W) Mitchell Hammock Rd
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 1999
(N-S) SR434
File Name: OM1899.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
---- ---- ----
No. Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 < 0 2 1 1 1 1. 1
Volumes 130 1031 452 159 586 90 463 .463 114 166 496 53
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 80 0 30 10
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WE Left * * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right * * EB Right * *
SB Right * * WE Right
Green 10.0A 35.0A Green . 2 0 . OA 36 . OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 .
Cycle Length: 120 sees Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lane Group:
Mvrnts Cap
Intersection Performance Summary
Adj Sat v/c g/C
Flow Ratio Ratio Delay
LOS
Approach:
Delay LOS
EB L 224 1770 0.612 0.425 19.2 C 32.8 D
T 1149 3725 0.992 0.308 45.3 E
R 1359 1583 0.289 0.858 1.1 A
WE L 224 1770 0.746 0.425 26.5 D 24.8 C
TR 1126 3651 0.664 0.308 24.4 C
NB L 649 3539 0.774 0.183 34.1 D 30.2 D
T 590 1863 0.825 0.317 31.0 D
R 1174 1583 0.075 0.742 2.7 A
SB L 324 1770 0.539 0.183 30.1 D 32.4 D
T 590 1863 0.885 0.317 35.7 D
R 1174 1583 0.038 0.742 2.7 A
Intersection Delay = 30.4 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 see Critical v/c(x) = 0.910
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
~(p
-
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 07-23-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Streets: (E-W) SR426
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 1999
(N-S) SR434
File Name: OM1999.HC9
11-24-98 pm
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastboupd Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
---- ---- - - -- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
No. Lanes 1 1 < 0 1 1 < 0 0 > 1 0 0 > 1 < 0
Volumes 89 448 33 47 357 13 29 . 393 128 379 82
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
-----------_._----------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * * SB Left * *
Thru * * Thru * *
Right * * Right * *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 12.0A 44.0A Green 15.0A 52.0A
. Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0
Cycle Length: 142 sees Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lane Group:
Mvrnts Cap
Intersection Performance Summary
Adj Sat v/e g/C
Flow Ratio Ratio Delay
LOS
Approach:
Delay LOS
EB L 174 538 0.539 0.324 28.0D 35.3 D
TR 597 1843 0.849 0.324 36.7 D
WB L 214 1770 0.229 0.437 18.6 C 18.8 C
TR 809 1853 0.482 0.437 18.8 C
NB LT 507 1333 0.878 0.380 37.7 D 37.7 D
SB LTR 784 1504 0.791 0.521 21.8 C 21.8 C
Intersection Delay = 28.4 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 see Critical v/c(x) = 0.763
.:.
.
??
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 07-23-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
Streets: (E-W) SR434
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 1999
(N-S) GreeneWay east
File Name: OM2099.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
=======================================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
----
No. Lanes 1 1 0 0 2 1 2 0 1 0 0 0
Volumes 15 787 560 54 363 66
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
-
---------------------~--------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru
Right Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left SB Left
Thru * Thru
Right * Right
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right * WB Right *
Green 70.0A Green 12.0A
Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 .
Cycle Length: 92 sees Phase combination order: #1 #5
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lane Group:
Mvrnts Cap
Intersection Performance Summary
Adj Sat v/c g/C
Flow Ratio Ratio Delay
LOS
Approach:
Delay LOS
EB L 477 609 0.~34 0.783 1.4 A 2.9 A
T 1458 1863 0.568 0.783 2.9 A
WB T 2916 3725 0.212. 0.783 1.7 A 1.5 A
R 1583 1583 0.036 1.000 0.0 A
NB L 539 3539 0.730 0.152 27.5 D 26.7 D
R 241 1583 0.286 0.152 22.5 C
Intersection Delay = 8.0 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 see Critical v/c(x) = 0.594
'"
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
'?~
-
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 07-23-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Streets: (E-W) SR434
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 1999
(N-S) GreeneWay west
File Name: OM2199.HC9
11-24-98 pm
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 0 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Volumes 721 215 24 899 80 44
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left NB Left
Thru * Thru
Right * Right
Peds Peds
WE Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru
Right Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right *
SB Right * WE Right
Green 70.0A Green 12.0A
. Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0
Cycle Length: 92 sees Phase combination order: #1 #5
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lane Group:
Mvmts Cap
Intersection Performance Summary
Adj Sat v/c g/C
Flow Ratio Ratio Delay
LOS
Approach:
Delay LOS
EB T 1458 1863 0.521 0.783 2.6 A 2.0 A
R 1583 1583 0.143 1.000 0.0 A
WB L 133 169 0.189 0.783 1.7 A 1.9 A
T 2916 3725 0.341 0.783 1.9 A
SB L 269 1770 0.312 0.152 22.6 C 14.6 B
R 1583 1583 0.029 1.000 0.0 A
Intersection Delay = 2.8 sec/veh Intersection LOS = A
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 see Critical v/c(x) = 0.487
....
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
?,
HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 07-23-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
{N-S} Tuskawilla Road
File Name: OM2299.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
Streets: {E-W} SR434
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year. 1999
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
---- ---- ---- ----
No. Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 < 0 1 > .1 1 1 1 1
Volumes 37 885 571 54 769 12 428 43 29 30 66 22
Lane W {ft} 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 120 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4
EB Left * * NB Left
Thru * Thru
Right * Right
Peds Peds
WE Left * * SB Left
Thru * Thru
Right * Right .
Peds Peds
NB Right * * EB Right
SB Right * * WE Right
Green 12.0A 37.0A Green 25.0A 15.0A
Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0
5::~:_~:~~:~~_~~~_~::~__:~~~:_:~~~~~:~~~_~:~::~_~~_~~_~~_~~___________4It
Intersection Performance Summary
Adj Sat v/c g/C
Flow Ratio Ratio
5
6
7
8
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Lane
Mvmts
Group:
Cap
Delay
LOS
Approach:
Delay. LOS
EB L 282 1770 0.138 0.509 10.2 B 14.4 B
T 1345 3725 0.728 0.361 20.7 C
R 1305 1583 0.364 0.824 1.6 A
WE L 282 1770 0.202 0.509 11.0 B 18.8 C
TR 1342 3717 0.643 0.361 19.3 C
NB L 442 1770 0.561 0.250 24.0 C 22.7 C
LT 447 1790 0.554 0.250 23.9 C
R 1246 1583 0.025 0.787 1.6 A
SB L 279 1770 0.115 0.157 25.2 D 21.6 C
T 293 1863 0.235 0.157 25.8 D
R 1056 1583 0.022 0.667 3.9 A
Intersection Delay = 17.4 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c{x} = 0.531
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
~
-
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 07-23-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
.
Streets: (E-W) SR434
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 1999
(N-S) CR419
File Name: OM2399.HC9
11-24-98 .pm
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1
Volumes 38 907 710 532 690 49
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 300 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * * NB Left
Thru * * Thru
Right Right
Peds Peds
WE Left SB Left *
Thru * Thru
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right * "" WE Right
Green 10.0A 4 0 . OA Green 50.0A
. Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0
Cycle Length:_ 114 sees Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5
Lane Group:
Mvrnts Cap
Intersection Performance Summary
Adj Sat v/c g/C
Flow Ratio Ratio Delay
LOS
Approach:
Delay LOS
EB L 242 1770 0.165 0.491 11.1 B 13.2 B
T 1830 3725 0.548 0.491 13.3 B
WB T 1373 3725 0.571 0.368 19.0 C 18.7 C
R 583 1583 0.418 0.368 17.7 C
SB L 807 1770 0.899 0.456 27.8 D 25.9 D
R 1542 1583 0.034 0.974 0.0 A
Intersection Delay = 18.7 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 see Critical v/c(x) = 0.717
.
~(
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 07-23-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
Streets: (E-W) SR426
Analyst: JJM '
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 1999
(N-S) Tuskawilla Road
File Name: OM2499.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
---- ---- ---- ----
No. Lanes 2 2 < 0 1 2 1 1 1- < 0 2 1 1
Volumes 459 1046 1 1 779 855 1 1 2 411 1 319
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 300 0 100
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
---------------------.--------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * * Thru *
Right * * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right * * WB Right *
Green 22.0A 4 6 . OA Green 25.0A
Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 .
Cycle Length: 107 sees Phase combination order: #1#2 #5
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 761 3539 0.653 0.215 26.2 D 11.3 B
TR 2576 3725 0.449 0.692 4.9 A
WB L 102 227 0.010 0.449 - 10.6 B 10.0 B
T 1671 3725 0.515 0.449 13.9 B
R 1154 1583 0.506 0.729 4.3 A
NB L 446 1768 0.002 0.252 19.3 C 19.3 C
TR 423 1676 0.007 0.252 19.4 C
SB L 839 3326 0.531 0.252 22.8 C 15.1 C
T 470 1863 0.002 0.252 19.3 C
R 1539 1583 - 0.150 0.972 0.0 A
Intersection Delay = 11.5 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 see Critical v/c(x) = 0.540
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
~2-
-
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 07-23-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
.
Streets: (E-W) SR426
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 1999
(N-S) GreeneWay west
File Name: OM2599.HC9
11-24-98 pm
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 0 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Volumes 1330 69 1480 49
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left NB Left
Thru * Thru
Right Right
Peds Peds
WE Left * SB Left *
Thru * * Thru
Right Right
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WE Right
Green 15.0A 60.0A Green 12.0A
. Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0
Cycle Length: 101 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
,
EB T 2287 3725 0.643 0.614 8.5 B 8.5 B
WE L 280 1770 0.260 0.158 24.2 C 3.4 A
T 2988 3725 0.548 0.802 2.4 A
SB L 245 1770 0.212 0.139 25.0 C 25.0 C
Intersection Delay = 6.0 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.498
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
03
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 07-23-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
(N-S) GreeneWay east
File Name: OM2699.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
Streets: (E-W) SR426
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 1999
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Volumes 181 1198 938 611
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * * Thru
Right Right
Peds Peds
WE Left SB Left
Thru * Thru
Right Right .
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WE Right
Green 18.0A 50.0A Green. 20.0A
Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0
Cycle Length: 102 sees Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5
7
8
.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lane Group:
Mvmts Cap
Intersection Performance Summary
Adj Sat v/c g/C
Flow Ratio Ratio Delay
LOS
Approach:
Delay LOS
EB L 330 1770 0.579 0.186 26.3 D 6.8 B
T 2703 3725 0.490 0.725 4.0 A
WE T 1899 3725 0.545 0.510 11.2 B 11.2 B
NB L 763 3539 0.867 0.216 32.3 D 32.3 D
Intersection Delay = 13.5 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 see Critical v/c(x} = 0.629
----
.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
t-i
-
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 07-23-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
.
Streets: (E-W) SR426
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 1999
(N-S) Dean Road
File Name: OM2799.HC9
11-24-98 pm
=======================================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
---- ---- ---- - ---
No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 > 1 1 0 > 1 1
Volumes 11 728 523 252 469 5 526 5 359 1 4 16
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 150 0 100 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
---------------------~-------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * * SB Left *
Thru * * Thru *
Right * * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right * EB Right *
SB Right * * WE Right *
Green 20.0A 60.0A Green 40.0A
. Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0
Cycle Length: 134 sees Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 176 274 0.068 0.642 5.8 B 20.0 C
T 862 1863 0.889 0.463 29.2 D
R 1264 1583 0.311 0.799 2.4 A
WE L 333 1770 0.796 0.642 35.1 D 17.2 C
T 1195 1863 0.413 0.642 7.7 B
R 1548 1583 0.003 0.978 0.0 A
NB LT 542 1728 1.032 0.313 68.4 F 50.4 E
R 780 1583 0.350 0.493 13.6 B
SB LT 488 1557 0.010 0.313 20.5 C 4.7 A
R 1548 1583 0.011 0.978 0.0 A
Intersection Delay = 28.2 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 see Critical v/c(x) = 0.948
.
r -.)-
HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 07-23-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
Streets: (E-W) Chapman Road
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 1999
(N-S) SR426
File Name: OM2899.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
=======================================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
- - -- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
No. Lanes 0 > 1 < 0 1 1 < 0 1 1 < 0 1 1 < 0
Volumes 1 3 1 131 1 304 2 634 332 310 410 5
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3~00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
---------------------.--------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WE Left * SB Left * *
Thru * Thru * *
Right * Right * *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WE Right
Green 20.0A Green 16.0A 54 . OA
Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 .
Cycle Length: 105 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB LTR 305 1455 0.016 0.210 21.3 C 21.3 C
WE L 365 174~ 0.378 0.210 23.3 C 46.6 E
TR 332 1584 0.967 0.210 56.6 E
NB L 236 443 0.008 0.533 7.4 B * *
TR 942 1767 1.078 0.533 * *
SB L 374 1770 0.872 0.733 35.5 D 17.0 C
-"- TR 1364 1860 0.320 0.733 3.2 A
Intersection Delay = * ( sec/veh) Intersection LOS = *
(g/C)*(V/c) is greater th~:m one. Calculation of D1 is infeasible.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
if,
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 07-23-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Streets: (E-W) Oviedo Marketplace
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 1999
(N-S) SR426
File Name: OM2999.HC9
11-24-98 pm
=======================================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 2 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 1. 1
Volumes 142 74 93 1058 805 107
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00.
-------------------------------------------------------------------~---
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru Thru * *
Right * Right
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left
Thru Thru *
Right Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right *
SB Right * WB Right
Green 10.0A Green 28.0A 80.0A
. Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0
Cycle Length: 132 sees Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 322 3539 0.476 0.091 37.7 D 31.7 D
R 528 1583 0.148 0.333 19.9 C
NB L 778 3539 0.130 0.220 26.7 D 4.9 A
T 1609 1863 0.692 0.864 2.9 A
SB T 1157 1863 0.732 0.621 12.9 B 11. 8 B
R 1164 1583 0.097 0.735 3.2 A
Intersection Delay = 10.2 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 see Critical v/c(x) = 0.672
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
8'7
HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g .07-23-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
Streets: (E-W) Winter Springs Blvd
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 1999
(N-S) SR426
File Name: OM3099.HC9
. 11- 24 - 98 pm
.
=======================================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
---- ----
No. Lanes 1 1 1 0 > 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1
Volumes 120 10 274 58 13 15 547 737 7 1 467 157
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 80 0 0 60
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 :3. 00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
---------------------~--------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru * *
Right * Right * *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right * EB Right * *
SB Right * WB Right * *
Green 20.0A Green 22.0A 62.0A
Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 .
Cycle Length: 118 sees Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lane Group:
Mvrnts Cap
Intersection Performance Summary
Adj Sat v/c g/C
Flow Ratio Ratio Delay
LOS
Approach:
Delay LOS
EB L 247 1325 0.510 0.186 29.3 D 11.7 B
T 347 1863 0.032 0.186 25.4 D
R 1583 1583 0.129 1.000 0.0 A
WB LT 320 1718 0.234 0.186 26.5 D 21.8 C
R 1583 1583 0.010 1.000 0.0 A
NB L 690 3539 0 . 860 0 . 195 3'7 . 2 D 18 . 3 C
T 1421 1863 0.546 0.763 4.0 A
R 1583 1583 0.004 1.000 0.0 A
SB L 123 227 0.008 0.542 8.0 B 9.7 B
T 1010 1863 0.487 0.542 11.2 B
R 1194 1583 0.085 0.754 2.5 A
Intersection Delay = 15.3 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 see Critical v/c(x) = 0.570
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
~{J
-
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 07-23-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
.
Streets: (E-W) SR426
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 1999
(N-S) Lake Jessup
File Name: OM3199.HC9
11-24-98 pm
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
East;bound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
- --- ---- --- - ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
No. Lanes 1 1 < 0 1 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 1
Volumes 145 551 42 9 444 43 49 88 20 42 57 87
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right * WB Right
Green 57.0A Green 2 0 . OA
. Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0
Cycle Length: 87 sees Phase combination order: #1 #5
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection ,Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 288 425 0.530 0.678 6.0 B 4.9 A
TR 1250 1843 0.499 0.678 4.7 A
WB L 187 276 0.048 0.678 3.0 A 4.1 A
TR 1247 1838 0.411 0.678 4.2 A
NB LTR 367 1453 0.452 0.253 18.3 C 18.3 C
SB LT 336 1329 0.310 0.253 17.2 C 9.1 B
R 1583 1583 0.058 1. 000 0.0 A
Intersection Delay = 6.5 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 sec Critical v / c (x) = 0.509
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
8'
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 07-23-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
\
Streets: (E-W) CR419
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 1999
(N-S) Lockwood Blvd
File Name: OM3299.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
---- ---- ---- ----
No. Lanes 0 > 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 < 0
Volumes 9 284 202 340 185 15 192 251 551 24 110 9
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 40 0 200 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
---------------------~--------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right *, Right *
Peds Peds
WE Left * SB Left *
Thru * * Thru *
Right * * Right *
Peds Peds I
NB Right * EB Right * *
SB Right WB Right * *
Green 25.0A 26.0A Green 14 . OA 14.0A
Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 .
Cycle Length: 98 sees Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB LT 525 1836 0.587 0.286 20.7 C 14.6 B
R 1066 1583 0.160 0.673 3.8 A
WE L 469 1770 0.763 0.265 26.4 D 18.7 C
T 1083 1863 0.180 0.582 6.2 B
R 1535 1583 0.. 010 0.969 0.0 A
NB L 289 1770 0.699 0.163 30.0 D 26.6 D
T 304 1863 0.868 0.163 41.4 E
R 679 1583 0.544 0.429 14.2 B
SB L 289 1770 0.087 0.163 22.5 C 24.0 C
TR 301 1843 0.416 0.163 24.3 C
Intersection Delay = 21.4 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 see Critical v/c(x) = 0.661
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
qc>
.
.~
...".
.
...--
.
,.
~
Page 91
SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
Traffic Impact Study
Oviedo Marketplace
August 20,1999
-
)
~
-~
..
.\0
t
-r
~
~
,
OVIEDO MARKETPLACE SURVEY FORM
The Rouse Company, owners of the Oviedo Marketplace Mall, in conjunction with the City
of Oviedo and Seminole County need to determine trip making characteristics of shoppers
and mall employees. Specifically, we need to know what roads you used to travel to or
from the mall.
FOR ARRIVING AurOS
1. What is your reason for coming to Oviedo Marketplace today?
Shopping
Employee
Other
2. Where did your trip to Oviedo Marketplace begin? - (nearest major intersection or landmark)
3. What roads within eight miles of Oviedo Marketplace did you drive on to come here?
INDICATE ON MAP ON REVERSE
4. Auto occupancy
Thank you very much. Have a Dice day.
FOR DEPARTING AurOS
1. What is your reason for being at Oviedo Marketplace today?
Shopping
Employee
Other
2. What is the destination of your trip as you leave the mall? - (nearest major intersection or landmark)
3. What roads within eight miles of Oviedo Marketplace will you use when leaving the mall?
INDICATE ON MAP ON REVERSE
4. Auto occupancy
TbaDk you very much. Have a Dice day
'32-
:I
SR.
,
~
/.
....-,.-
. . .~ -... .
. ....-.... ....
..-i' ',.. .::..
...C.:":. VOUlSlACOmrIY . .
~;mm;oiIcom;;-.~:--1
l
\
ou.s
--
I
IC;IU:.~-"'"
. ..
. .a I I
----
...
.
~
r
l
n
.....
.
j. .
!
..
!
i
1
t.
'.
lID
.
.
.
Page 93
ANNUAL GROWTH RATES
Traffic Impact Study
Oviedo Marketplace
August 20, 1999
-
Page 94
Table A-3
PROJECTED ANNUAL GROWTH RATES
Oviedo Marketplace
.
"
Total Growth Annual
Segment Traffuic to Growth
Roadway From - To Existin2 Year 2005 Year 200S Rate
Semoran Boulevard (SR4436 SR50 - University Blvd. 54,713 61,868 7,155 2.18%
University Blvd. - Alorna Ave. 56,020 71,985 15,965 4.07%
Aloma Ave. - Howell Branch Rd. 56,020 64,882 8,862 2.26%
Howell Branch Rd.. - Lakemont Ave. 52,949 61,222 8,273 2.23%
Lakemont Ave. - Red Bug Lake Rd. 92,949 106,411 13,462 2.07%
Red Bug Lake Rd. - US 17-92 79,410 94,219 14,809 2.66%
US 17-92 - CR 427 59,297 71,930 12,633 3.04%
Goldenrod Road (SR 551) SR 50 - University Blvd. 31,692 44,684 12,992 5.12%
University Blvd; - Aloma Ave. 24,754 35,689 10,935 5.52%
Dodd Road Howell Branch Rd, - Dike Rd. 12,829 17,101 4,272 4.76%
Dike Rd. - Red Bu~ Lake Rd. 9,975 16,682 6,707 9.61%
Tuskawilla Road Aloma Ave. - Dike Rd. 18,390 28,762 10,372 8.06%
Dike Rd. - Red Bu~ Lake Rd. 25,731 31,291 5,560 3.09%
Red Bu~ Lake Rd. - Lake Dr. 25,080 29,965 4,885 2.78%
Lake Dr. - Wmter Springs Blvd. 21,414 34,548 13,134 8.76%
Wmter Springs Blvd. - SR 434 14,226 21,762 7,536 7.57%
GreeneWay SR 50 - University Blvd. 38,730 43,520 4,790 1.77%
University Blvd. - Aloma Ave. 28,280 36,043 7,763 3.92%
Aloma Ave. - Red Bug Lake Rd. 23 ,200 28,905 5,705 3.51%
Red Bug Lake Rd. - SR 434 16,000 31,478 15,478 13.82%
SR 434 - Lake Marv Blvd. 14,700 34,031 19,331 18.79%
Dean Road SR 50 - University Blvd, 22,623 28,307 5,684 3.14%
University Blvd. - McCulloch Rd. 14,890 19,014 4,124 3.46%
McCulloch Rd. - Alorna Avenue 15,484 18,438 2,954 3.18%
Rouse Rd. SR 50 - University Blvd. 12,078 22,852 10,774 11.15 %
SR 434 SR 50 - University Blvd. 48,429 56,962 8,533 3.52%
University Blvd. - Corporate Blvd. 36,906 48,692 11,786 4.56%
Corporate Blvd. - McCulloch Rd. 36,906 49,802 12,896 4.99%
McCulloch Rd, - Ciiapman Rd. 32,767 45,528 12,761 5.56%
Chapman Rd. - Alafaya Woods Blvd. 22,214 31,000 8,786 5.65%
Alatava Woods Blvd. - Mitchell Hammock Rd. 30,537 39,297 8,760 4.10%
Mitchell Hammock Rd. - Alorna Ave. 17,338 19,869 2,531 2.09%
Alorna Ave. - GreeneWay 17,239 20,239 3,000 2.49%
GreeneWay - Tuskawilla Rd. 18,617 25,645 7,028 5.39%
Tuskawilla Rd. - SR 419 33,121 42,793 9,672 4.17%
SR 419 - US 17-92 26,761 35,926 9,165 4.89%
US 17-92 - CR 427 34,809 39,988 5,179 2.13%
Lockwood Road McCulloch Rd. - Seminole Creek Dr. 11,879 17,553 5,674 6.82%
Seminole Creek Dr. - Little Econ River 11,879 17,553 5,674 6.82%
Little Econ River - Mitchell Hammock Rd. 10,922 14,053 3,131 4.10%
Mitchell Hammock Rd. - SR 419 17,923 25,565 .7,642 6.09%
SR 419 - CR 426 4,094 4,871 777 2.71%
McCulloch Road SR 434 - Lockwood Rd. 12,244 15,466 3,222 3.76%
University Boulevard SR 436 - Goldenrod Rd. 47,837 93,116 45,279 11.83 %
Goldenrod Rd. - Boon Tr. 44,609 65,816 21,207 5.94%
Boon Tr. - GreeneWay 44,609 65,816 21,207 5.94%
GreeneWay - Dean Rd. 56,586 87,893 31,307 6.92%
Dean Rd. - Rouse Rd. 57,266 91,738 34,472 7.52%
Rouse Rd. - Alafava Tr. 44.740 54.461 9721 3.62%
.
.
Source: Glarting Jackson Kercher AngUn Lopez RUIehtut. Inc.
..
Page 95
Table A-3 (Continued)
PROJECTED ANNUAL GROWTH RATES
Oviedo Marketplace
Total Growth Annual
Segment Traffuic to Growth
Roadwav From - To Existini! Year 2005 Year 2005 Rate
Aloma Ave. (SR 426) US 17-92 - Lakemont Ave. 46,606 58,810 12,204 3.27%
Lakemont Ave. - SR 436 46,606 58,810 12,204 3.27%
SR 436 - Goldenrod Rd. 38,655 49,056 10,401 3.36%
Goldenrod Rd. - Howell Branch Rd. 27,368 39,189 11 ,821 5.40%
Howell Branch Rd. - Tuskawil1a Rd. 29,083 36,231 7,148 3.51%
Tuskawilla Rd. - GreeneWav 29,641 34,861 5,220 2.52%
GreeneWay - Dean Rd. 24,344 32,572 8,228 4.83%
Dean Rd. - Chal'man Rd. 20,157 28,841 8,684 6.15%
. Chapman Rd. - Slavia Rd. 19,498 32,482 12,984 9.51%
Slavia Rd. - Mitchell Hammock Rd, 19,498 26,531 7,033 5~15%
Mitchell Hammock Rd. - Oviedo Marketplace Bl 24,401 37,157 12,756 7.47%
Oviedo MarketDlace Blvd. - Winter Sl'~S Blvd 24,401 33,072 8,671 5.08%
W. Broadway St. (SR 426) Wmter Sl'rin2s Blvd. - Lake Jessup Dr. 18,740 23,355 4,615 3.52%
Lake Jessuo Dr. - SR 434 12,458 18,150 5,692 6.53%
Geneva Dr. (CR 426) CR 419 - Lockwood Rd. 7,729 8,998 1,269 2.35%
Lockwood Rd. - Seminole Woods Blvd. 6,992 11 ,692 4,700 9.60%
Horatio Avenue US 17-92 - Thistle Ln. 35,096 41,633 6,537 2.66%
Howell Branch Thistle Ln. - Lake Howell Rd. 26 792 33,134 6,342 3.38%
Lake Howell Rd. - SR 436 30,362 37,996 7,634 2,79%
SR 436 - Dike Rd. 24,382 29,645 5,263 3.08%
Dike Rd. - Dodd Rd. 14,464 17,271 2,807 2.77%
Dodd Rd. - Aloma Ave. 14,783 20,971 6,188 5.98%
Dike Road Howell Branch Rd. - Dodd Rd 8,777 10,060 1,283 2.09%
Dodd Rd. - Tuskawilla Rd. 7,379 9,311 1,932 3.74%
Slavia Road Red Bug Lake Rd. - Aloma Ave. 6,937 13,698 6,761 13.92%
Red Bug Lake Road SR 436 - Wmter Park Rd. 52,270 63,345 11,075 4.24%
Wmter Park Rd. - Eagle Circle 52,270 63,736 11 ,466 4.39%
;Ea21e Circle - Noddin2 Pines Way 42,567 49,847 7,280 3.42%
Nodding Pines Way - Dodd Rd. 42,567 60,773 18,206 8.55%
Dodd Rd. - Tuskawilla Rd. 42,567 65,273 22,706 10.67%
Tuskawilla Rd. - Sun Dr. 32,151 54,372 22,221 9.87%
Sun Dr. - Citrus Rd. 31,556 56,728 25,172 11.40%
Citrus Rd. - Slavia Rd. 34,974 56,065 21,091 8.61%
Slavia Rd. - Site Entrance (south) 27,499 55,957 28,458 14.78%
Site Entrance (south) - Dovera Rd, 27,499 53,658 26,159 13.59%
Dovera Rd. - Oviedo Marketplace Blvd. 27,499 42 521 15,022 7,80%
- Oviedo Marketplace Blvd. - Target Entrance 27,499 43,491 15,992 8.31%
Target Entrance - GreeneWav 27,499 47,689 20,190 10.49%
GreeneWay - Aloma Ave. 35,756 61,966 26,210 10.47%
Mitchell Hammock Road Aloma Ave. - SR 434 30,134 46,014 15,880 8.78%
SR 434 - Lockwood Rd. 23,469 33,899 10,430 7.41%
lCha1>man Rd. SR 426 - SR 434 11 ,097 18 442 7,345 9.46%
Seminola Boulevard US 17-92 - Lake Dr. 15,232 20,642 5,410 5.07%
Lake Drive Seminola Blvd. - Tuskawilla Rd. 9,971 17,631 7660 10.97%
- SR 434 - Lockwood Rd. 9,893 16,235 6,342 9.16%
CR 419
Lockwood Rd. - Second St. 15.145 21,732 6,587 6.21%
Wmter Spirngs Boulevard SR426 - Northern Way 12,260 15,733 3,473 3.54%
Northern Way - Northern Way 7,284 10,547 3,263 5.60%
Northern Way - Tuskawilla Rd. 7,384 11,790 4,406 7.46%
orthern Wav South Wmter Snrin2s Blvd. - Wmter SDrinlrS Blvd. 4000 8.480 4480 14.00%
SOlITa: Glaning Jad:son Kercher Anglin Lopez RineJuuT. Inc.
Page 96
INTERSECTION SIGNIFICANCE METHODOLOGY
Traffic Impact Study
Oviedo Marketplace
August 20. 1999
.
.
.
.
.
.
..~
Intersection Significance Methodology
The purpose of this procedure is to define whether or not an intersection will experience a
significant impact from a proposed O~velopment of Regional Impact (ORI). The methodology
defines the anaJysis techniques necessary to evaluate potential solutions to any intersection
deficiencies which are identified.
.' '.
+
Step 1 a - An HCS analysis will be conducted for existing traffic volumes with existing signaJ timings
for intersections at the ends of significantly impacted links. In certain cases, intersections will also
'; ..
be included where the impact on the link is nearly significant and an unusually high percentage of
the impact trips turn at the adjacent intersection.
Step 1 b - A significance test will be performed for each lane group. Project impacts will be
summarized adjacent to the lane group capacity on the HCS analysis. The significance threshoJd
for ORI's with existing development orders (D.O.) specifying a 10 percent significance test will be
calculated as the lane group capacity X 0.87 X .10. This represents 10 percent of the theoretical
Level-of-Service "C" service volume for each lane group. All other projects will calcuJate
significa~ce based on 5 percent of the adopted lane group capacity. As noted in the flow chart, if
none of the lane groups have a significant impact, the analysis procedure ends.
Step 2 - When there i's a significantly impacted lane group, the HCS analysis will be performed
. using future volumes with existing signal timings. If there are no significantly impacted lane groups
with an LOS below DE", and the approach LOS does not fall below the adopted LOS, then the
analysis procedure will end.
Step 3 - If there is a significantly impacted Jane group which is below LOS "E", or the approach LOS
is below the adopted LOS, signaJ timing adjustments will be made based upon reasonable
engineering judgement. If after making .signal" timing adjustments a significantly impacted turn-lane.
group is still operating below LOS "E", additional tum lanes will be added if feasible. If a
significantly impacted through lane grou~ is still operating below the adopted LOS, an arterial
analysis will be performed to verify that the sections containing the intersection have an arterial
LOS that is not below the adopted LOS. If the agency responsibJe for the signal timing ~grees with
the proposed signal'timing,~nd there are no lane groups below LOS "E", the analysis will end.
..'
Step 4 - If one or more lane groups fail Step 3, additional intersection improvements will be tested
using HCs a~alysis. An acceptable improvement will be identified by the following conditions:
Cf?
, .
--
a) No significantly impacted turn lane groups below LOS "En.
b)
No through lane groups with an arterial level of service below the adopted LOS.
.
c)
No new volume to capacity (v/c) changes that'fl,ould reduce the LOS to below the
adopted standard, and that were not present in Step 3 (Step 2 if no new signal
timing adjustments were permitted by the maintaining agency.) For turn lane groups
not addressed in a), the LOS cannot be reduced below LOS "E" or, where the LOS
was already below E, the vlc cannot be increased as compared to Steps 2 and/or 3.
Through lane groups can not be reduced below the adopted LOS, or if the existing
LOS is already below the adopted LOS, the vlc ratio can not be increased above the
vlc ratio from Step 3 (Step 2 if no new signal timing adjustments were approved).
"-
..
-
d) The (v/c) ratio on failing (Le., stars in the HCS analysis) lane groups which are not
significantly impacted is not increased above the (v/c) ratio from Step 3 (Step 2 if no
new signal timing adjustments were approved.).
.
Step 5 _ If no feasible geometric improvements can be made to the intersection to solve the
significantly impacted lane group(s) deficiency, the storage lengths for the lane group(s) will be
checked and improvements to the storage improved where necessary and feasible. .
A flow chart of the procedure is shown in Figure 5.
--'-.
Programmed improvements will be considered while performing future year analysis. Any planned
improvements will be considered while providing recommendations. ..'
.
2
~6
-
Significance Test Methodol<;>9Y Flow Chart
.
STEP 10
PertOtm HCS Anolysis tOt Existing Trottic
VoIl..fTleS and Signal r U"I'lings
STEP 1 b
Pettann Test tOt Significonce by lone
GrO\.lP
.;.:-
. .
Perfonn HCS Anolysis tOt MISe TrofflC
VoII..fTleS and ExIsting Signal TomingS
STEP 2
.
YES
Make SignOI Taning AdjUStments and
Perfonn HCS Anolysis tOt futlSe TrotflC
VoI\XTlElS
STEP 3
NO
Perfonn Atterlo1 Ardysis to Ved1y thot the
AtteriollOS is At:JcW the AdOPted LOS
YES
Make GeometliC ImprOII8ITleI'Its' and
Perform HCS Ano!ysis tOt futlSe Trottic
VoI\.meS
STEP 4
Add Addi1IOnCd TLIn LoneS If
FeosibIe
STEPS
YES
If No Feasible Geometric Improvements
Can Be Made to Improve the foiling
SgnfICOt'4 \.OI'le GfoUp(s). the Storage
ler.gtt'l(s) tot the t.one Gteup(s) WiD Be
CheC;lcec:l and Improvec:l Whete
N8CeS$ClIY and Feasible
.
-Nore: .lo.eeeptoOle ~Is wlI od/'l8f8 to Itle (o6OWinQ eo Jb IS:
(I) No sJonIfft:OfIltt rnpor;ted Il.fn /oIl8 QtOIoPS beloW L...... 01 SeMee 'F.
(2) No ItV'oul:Jh OW gOAJP$ldh on orletfd IIMJI of ~ below the tXlCPted IeYeI 01 saMee.
(3) No new...oU"M to eapot:/t'f (vie) cftCItQtIS that wocJd reOJee IM/eWt 01 UtNIt:e to below 1M ot:1opted
stondott1 and that _.-not plflSent h Step 3 ~ep 21f no new sIgtCIltnlnQ CICfuSIll'*III- pemm<<1 by the
mcintaIrinQ ogeneyJ. For Il.fn /oIl8 QtOIoPS not odf:hSSed h (J). the ,.,. 01 saMce con not be ~ beloW
If1veI 01 ~ 'F. or wtIMI the /riel 01 JaMc:e \lIoOr cieodf beloW 'F. 1M vIe con not oe ho'.aaed as
c.... .~8d to Stfipl2 and/or J. JhtOUQh /cInfI QtOIoPS con not be teQIced below 1M tXlCPted""'" 01 seMc:e. or
If the emt/ng leYeI 01 seMce" dt80dY below the adopted IBVfII of seMc:e. the vte tg#O con not be ttcreGJ6d .
cbCWI the vIe ratio hem Step 3 (Step 21f norww sJonoI ttmQ ~ - opptOV'8d).
(4) The vIe ratio on fdIInQ (I.fI~ slOtS h the HCS QTtClysJsJ lane QtOIoPS...Hdl en not JItTiflt:<<IflY ~"not
/rot;NIOSl1d ot:/OVe trIG vIe ratIO 6'om Step 3 ~ep2lfno /MWrJgtd ttMg ~tJ _41 ~
~9
Page 1 {)()
ART-PLAN ANALYSIS
~
Traffic Impact Study
Oviedo Marketplace
August 20,1999
.
.
.
.
.
.
Red Bug Lake Road
Eagle Circle - Tuskawilla Road
Page 101
Traffic Impact Study
Oviedo Marketplace
August 20, 1999
.
"'''1iftrw c' ".c'",w"'ili''''''''''''___''j!_lI'''I~JI''M''..., "."".''<iWllfjM' ")
r. I~~~tl't'
;;:;:::.. II::::::::::::':::::" '11.. II ........11'1111. 11111111....11.. II .11..11 .r<;;;;a;;;....':;::::;:::i."'*99.:.:.3::==:t.:.:.:,. ..':::::>:::'-:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:::::.:'::::::::1::'::: .- ...WlIfj. .,
......: ,,::. ,.:..;. :.'.::'. ".:.:.;..;:: .;.::.:;.;.;.... .:.::. ...;.;:.::::.:.;....;.:. ;:.,.; ': ::;.:'.;.;:':.:. ;':.,'. .:. .........:; '.:.;":: ~~luill'Y:::t:'" ...~.:::::::::::::::::.:.:::.: .:" :::::::::::::: ;.;.;.;.:.:-:..:::;:;:;:;:;:;::::;;::..... .:. .:.::." :~':'i';,;, : ::..;..;:;:r:=::...:: :y",: :
::DES~RIPTtON:: ... :<.: .:. . :::::::Y::1 .:. : ::.11: .: .:. . .
:>..:..:::'::..,::.:.:11 II . ..'::Roa~N~IIRed~gLakeRoad . ::::: ..: .. . .
.::: ::; .:.::. ..::::;;-::.::::u U . II.: i\!!ll.m!jlii:i.. ::>::::::Hmf:~m . EagleC~rc~ . . ..:.:11:.:. .:.... .,:.
:::::: II .:. .. i!.:li:\l\\llh..:..... . ,: To II Tuskawilm Road . : : ::::: .:.: .:..: .
· .. .. ." ,;'::'I\:\llili:II:\lillllliilli:llllli'I!\rnfi:I~~_mllii:;I::;;)':
~~10~:~I~~~"::\:'ml\;,\\;,\\;<:~~;'\;;:\\:::,\:::;'\::t "". .... '1::' ';";.. ...,i'i::i
:. : :::>y::::;. . .::.<.: ....::; ..,: ..... . :':::::T::::::;:K,.F.~or: : 0.091 ..:: .. .:
.. :::;~:::::::::U.;::~!<: :: ::.:; :::::.H::.::J~~~k~~.#:::: : ~::;: :: :/. ::. .... : .. ,:;::i::
.. .... .>>:::::::::.::<::::::o.::.::l'~J:s.aturatio~:F:~~:;: 1,850 ... .:... .. .. : . .
.. ::::,::~~:.::.:.::.::: .: :. .l().Tumsf!:(lni:Eii:ClUSiVe Lanes:: 14 :::::: ..... .. ;::;::::::
~"D~~~:ci.~P.~E~~::;!": :i :<::.:::.:~ . ::: :::.'-":;>::: .:.:: ::::::::::::: ::.:..:':: :::::.H::::.:.: ::: ::: .::.H:]!!:!!!I:!I!:1
T7IT7:~ .:. ....... .. ..:::::::T~~J:T:~t:::~/H. .. ... :: TH: ..... .. :.-:-::-:-::: ....... .:.:..::.::.: . .":::.:;/:::::HH
.. ..
.1.,;...;.... i:I:::!IIII:llllillll!II!:::::::IIII.....; t=;iiclIlRW.:1!1111:11::II:!:.;\\ii\.u :.
liii:llllli\l:!: . (::::::::~l~;;;;:''''.''':~j::~''.''-.'-!:M='..''-. ........:~:::~~\~~ ...........):,.t...:: ...: .
. .. .. : t\...:.:.~~~.:9jh!i:9tiw:j{:::::::::.:::4{~~~::::::(::::It,:::':}::::::..: ..:. .....:...:1
.:. ...::::: :... .:.: \t::-' ll\::l:tI\OON. .j.::.::<:35~:,3Chx:2S:{::::::.\):{\.}t:: .. . ..... :.. :.
.... . ::::;UUu.:<L . ::.. .0::. :: :..:....:.. .:::: :. :: ::.. .~::.: . ,::,.: ... ::;..:.: .. . .: .
S~N.P,tuz.A.l1ONP.ttARA.CTERIS~: ::::/::::.:::: : ..:: ::.:. ........ ..: ::: ... :.. . ..... . ..::.:..:..
. .: >y::::::..:.': :::::::::::::::::::;:::::::::::::. ...::::.: ,::::::::. .:.. ..... ........ ::::
111.111 :1:11 :11 :11.' :.1 :I~I:I .11:1':::....:. :.::.. :..~i-ryP~.P~k:Oi~ecti~:... ..3:":. :{~~21~:+;5~~f:':.:<.::::::I:::=::::111 .11.11 ::::\1:::.\
. . :::::::: . . .ArriVarT . 'off-P~kDirection::' 3 1:::::::':..UUJ~Li >::::::::::: . ... .. .
.. . ::::::m[:1[:mU:mypeSidn3J.S~m:, A j~~f~'~~~~::::.: .:..:
m" :. ::: :. .::::.. <:::)::.: .:SyStem.~e:Lengtt(: 141 . .... .. :::::.. .:::::::.::/::=.
:: .. .. .AiVei~ Thtou~.MOVement We. : 0.56 J::;::.;:HH:::;::::... . .. :: >::::> :::::::;..: :
. . :::::::::':mm:=:,:> ::s'!?':-:::::: .:.. Tn:::]:: ::::: ..: ::::::::: :jjj2L:=2C .: :. :: :: :.: :,: ::.. .:
.
.
102-
.
.
.
..::::.:::ur:.n.:.:::H::::\t:::f??fI':I:::(:\(.:.:::.:.:::'::::::.@:\"'E.IU.'lQJ.Rr:~tf:.".t;;1;Stt::.:.'::'...:);:::.:..::.::::+.::.::::::_:-:.
.:. ::.:..,::.,...::. .:.':.: '.:<. ::.".:::::;;;;"':Il 'l::. :/}:t:::::g.........:: ..:::.:.:::'~:::: \::: ...': ,: ..:.::.-. , ..'1"j\::(:':':{:::::f.'.\\(.r:mJik:::::::::::':::::::::::. ... ..... .. .'::<:;:-...::'-.::. :..: ..:...
Plaza En!.
T_Rd.
..
:::in ~gm;:. t.' ";..,.~~,:,~;.,~"...~~;"",, :':'."i.;.".'..,.:..ii'i,:',! .i::.:'.:!.'.: ...'..,....!::.:'...... '.:.'
", '.0' Mlle(S)",,,, , ,,_Ens. liI1.e_ ' , ,,"
1,914
2,017
2,179
1,797
3
3
3
3
6.9
24.7
3.4
o
2
2
2
2
138
154
115
109
Ic)~
SUPPORT DATA FOR ART-PLAN LEVEL OF SERVICE ESTIAMTE
Red BaI Lake Road rrOm EqIe Qrde to TasIamIDa Road
Owiedo MarIrdpIace DR!
1000
0.091
.
D Factor
0.568
Peak-Boar Factor
0.925
Percent Toms From Exclusive Lanes - Peak-Direc:tion
Pen:ent Toms From Exclusive Lanes - 00' -Peak Direction
Total Exdasive
Intersedion ADDroadl Toms -AI
Nodding Pines 2591 60 2.3%
Dodd Road 2292 390 17.0%
Plaza Entrance 2247 199 8.9"A.
Tuskawilla Road 2245 689 30.7%
Avel'llJ!e 2.344 335 14.3-1.
Total Exclusive
Intersection ADDroach Toms -I.
Plaza En1rance 1914 133 6.9"A.
Dodd Road 2017 499 24.7%
Nodding Pines 2179 75 3.4%
Ea2leCircle 1797 0 0.0%
Avel'llJ!e 1.977 177 8.9%
glC Ratio - Peak Direction
rJC Ratio - OO'-Peak Direction
.
Cyde
glC = (0.680+.449)12 =
0.5645
glC = (0.663+.514)12 = 0.5885
Source:
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
.
I t:> "t
HOM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 06-07-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=============================================~=========================
.
Streets: (E-W) Red Bug Lake Road
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005
(N-S) Eagle Circle
File Name: OMRBEC05.HC9
11-24-98 pm
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
---- ----
No. Lanes 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Volumes 450 2498 80 180
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 .
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Signal Operations
Phase COmbination 1 2 3 4
EB Left * NB Left
Thru * * Thru
Right Right
Peds Peds
WE Left SB Left
Thru * Thru
Right * Right
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right * * WE Right
Green 28.0A 54.0A Green 12.0A
Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0
Cycle Length: ~ se;.2 Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5
---------------- --------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Adj Sat v/c g/C
Flow Ratio Ratio
5
6
7
8
*
*
Lane
Mvrnts
Group:
Cap
Delay
LOS
Approach:
Delay LOS
EB L 487 1770 0.973 0.275 50.5 E 14.1 B
T 3042 3725 0.907 o 817 7.8 B
WE TR 1901 3701 1.045 O~ 45.1 E 45.1 E
SB L 227 1770 0.370 0.128 28.6 D 8.8 B
R 1540 1583 0.123 0.972 0.0 A
Intersection Delay = 25.0 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.929
.
I 05""
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 06-07-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
Streets: (E-W) Red Bug Lake Road
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005
(N-S) Nodding Pines
File Name: OMRBNP05.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
=======================================================================
Eastbound
L T R
Westbound
L T R
Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
0 >1 < 0 0 >. 1 1
3 1 11 50 5 20
12.0 12.0 12.0
0 0
3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
No. Lanes
Volumes
Lane W (ft)
RTOR Vols
Lost Time 3.00 3.00
3.00 3.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4
EB Left * NB Left
Thru * Thru
Right * Right
Peds Peds
WB ,Left * SB Left
Thru * Thru
Right * Right
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right *
SB Right * WB Right *
Green 90.0A Green. 15.0A
Yellow/AR 5 ~ Yellow/AR 5.0
~:::_~:~~:~~~ s~__:~~~:_:~~~~~:~~~_~:~::~_~=_~~_________________
Intersection Performance Summary
Adj Sat v/c g/C
Flow Ratio Ratio
5
6
7
8
*
*
*
*
*
*
.
Lane
Mvmts
Group:
Cap
Delay
LOS
Approach:
Delay LOS
EB L 83 103 0.509 0.800 6.6 B 10.8 B
T 2980 3725 0.938 (lr. 80QJ 10.9 B
R 1583 1583 0.013 1.000 0.0 A
WB L 65 81 0.324 0.800 3.0 A 4.8 A
T 2980 3725 0.780 co-. 80 0:::> 4.9 A
R 1583 1583 0.037 1.000 0.0 A
NB LTR 214 1449 0.075 0.148 27.3 D 27.3 D
SB LT 249 1683 0.233 0.148 28.0 D 20.6 C
R 1583 1583 0.013 1.000 0.0 A
Intersection Delay = 8.3 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.828
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
I b (,
....
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 06-07-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
.
Streets: (E-W) Red Bug Lake Road
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
(N-S) Dodd Road
File Name: OM0205.HC9
11-24-98 pm
=======================================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
---- ----
No. Lanes 2 1 1 2 2 1
Volumes 224 160 258 180 140 110
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
.
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4
EB Left * NB Left
Thru * Thru
Right * Right
Peds Peds
WE Left * SB Left
Thru * Thru
Right * Right
Peds Peds
NB Right * * EB Right * *
SB Right * * WE Right * *
Green 18.0A 82.0A Green 16.0A 18.0A
Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0
5::::_~:~~:~~S;:~_~~__:~:~:_:~~~~::~~~_~:~:=~_~:_~~_~:_~~___________
Intersection Performance Summary
Adj Sat v/c g/C
Flow Ratio Ratio
5
*
6
7
8
*
*
*
*
*
Lane
Mvmts
Group:
Cap
Delay
LOS
Approach:
Delay LOS
EB L 230 1770 0.779 0.130 52.4 E 43.1 E
T 2032 3725 1.034 Cg.~4~ 46.9 E
R 1316 1583 0.176 . 31 1.7 A
WE L 460 3539 0.448 0.130 40.5 E 19.8 C
T 2032 3725 0.826 CQ.545~ 20.8 C
-- R 1316 1583 0.247 0.831 1.8 A
NB L 595 3539 0.408 0.266 29.1 D 24.2 C
T 242 1863 0.694 0.130 47.0 E
R 1100 1583 0.247 0.695 5.6 B
SB L 414 3539 0.471 0.117 41.7 E 31.0 D
T 484 3725 0.318 0.130 39.4 D
R 1306 1583 0.089 0.825 1.7 A
Intersection Delay = 31.2 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.894
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
(0'1
HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 06-07-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
(N-S) Plaza Entrance
File Name: OMRBPE01.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
Streets: (E-W) Red Bug Lake Road
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
L T R
Westbound
L T R
Northbound
L T R
Southbound
L T R
3.00 3.00
1 1 < 0
124 4 132
12.0 12.0
1 1 < 0
25 13 39
12.0 12.0
No. Lanes
Volumes
Lane W (ft)
RTOR Vols
Lost Time
1 ~
<229:)2048
12.0 12.0
3.00
o 0
3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
------------------------------------------------------------------~----
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * * Thru *
Right * * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru '* * Thru *
Right * '* Right '*
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right *
SB Right WB Right *
Green 18.0A 72.0A 10.0A Green 19.0A .
Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0
Cycle Length: ~-s~ Phase combination order: #1 #2 #3 #5
----------------- ---------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB L 244 1770 0.168 0.138 34.0 D 7.4 B
T 3887 5588 0.610 (Q:. 696J 7.4 B
R 1342 1583 0.125 0.848 1.2 A
WB L 154 1770 0.565 0.087 42.6 E 14.5 B
T 2403 3725 0.820 crr :b45:) 13.6 B
-- R 1296 1583 0.041 0.819 1.5 A
NB L 218 1434 0.600 0.152 38.5 D 38.2 D
TR 242 1591 0.591 0.152 37.9 D
SB L 118 777 0.220 0.152 33.3 D 33.2 D
TR 252 1654 0.218 0.152 33.2 D
Intersection Delay = 12.5 see/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 see Critical v/e(x} = 0.688
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
/C>B
-
HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 06-07-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
.
Streets: (E-W) Red Bug Lake Rd.
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
(N-S) Tuskawilla Road
File Name: OM0305.HC9
11-24-98 pm
=======================================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 2 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1
Volumes 516 1261 370 317 541 460 370 598 222
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 90 80 60
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
------------------------------------------------------------------~----
.
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4
EB Left * NB Left
Thru * Thru
Right * Right
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left
Thru * Thru
Right * Right
Peds Peds
NB Right * * EB Right * *
SB Right * * WB Right * *
Green 24.0A 68.0A Green 22.0A 22.0A
Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0
Cycle Length~6 ~ Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Adj Sat v/c g/C
Flow Ratio Ratio
5
*
6
7
8
*
*
*
*
*
Lane
Mvmts
Group:
Cap
Delay
LOS
Approach:
Delay LOS
EB L 590 3539 0.768 0.167 44.3 E 46.2 E
T 1672 3725 1.029 q:~ 52.0 E
R 1259 1583 0.168 2.5 A
WB L 590 3539 0.948 0.167 59.6 E 32.0 D
T 1672 3725 0.833 0.449 27.2 D
R 1259 1583 0.234 0.795 2.6 A
NB L 544 3539 0.632 0.154 41.6 E 30.9 D
T 860 5588 0.728 0.154 42.8 E
R 1248 1583 0.320 0.788 3.1 A
SB L 544 3539 0.736 0.154 44.3 E 39.1 D
T 860 5588 0.805 0.154 45.1 E
R 1248 1583 0.137 0.788 2.5 A
Intersection Delay = 37.7 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.928
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
I~ 1
SR 426
Red Bug Lake Road - Lake Jessup Drive
Page 110
Traffic Impact Study
Oviedo Mar1(etplace
August 20, 1999
.
.
.
.
.
.
I~
:"\t,:,:::::::,:,:,, .... .. ..,...... . . fi}::?t:: I?\::::::::; . .....-. .... ."r<~"..;;; ."-9~1lliilllli. .'.:'::::::. . ...:':':'::':,:""':':,:,:,:}::: ...,:,:,:::,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:...::<:::... ..." ........
-:;:::::::::::::}:::::::::.:::::::::::::.:::.:.:::.::::.,.::::::,:::,:::::::::~,}:::::r:::}::::::r:,:,,;::::::::::...:::.>:..::::.:..: ::::::.:.:.:1';__.' :::a:.... ~::.:::::..:::.:.. '::.:::::':'::::::::::::::::::':.::.:.::::.::.: :':':::':::::.:'::<:.:.:::::.....:..:.::.:::.:.:.:::.:.
!~~~~~!iiliiiilli!!i!lliiil,i.,li!!!li'.:ii;II.III~~;~~ ii;~:t:~:~,.,.", .....,.. ,;'..I: ",I..:'I,"",::.I'I;'il.'I';"'li.,
'iiiii!ii'I!!!:'!i!!!iiii!iiim'iml/;iil!i,Ili[[,[!I!!i:i'!ii~srJ{ ~W:~II..'.'limi.I' !
::i~:::;. :.:::+H:.~~:::::::::<':'::: :::;.:q ":::::::":.:":USet:r~OtBS: . DefaultSpreadsheet .. ..
. :::::::... .::::... .......LlL. .......:::"C . . ... ......... .... . :;
g;~~~!lm;~~I.'I.:'i:I'."':..':I.II:!'}:,," ..' · .i'I.:!:;:.:i! '.II"I"I.ii"',li" .. ..i'" m'
::::; .::: .::: :,:::,::::<:::.: : tH>: HH: 1.1<11:1, ..: :::n:::> U:L~r::: :H ::::;': . .... . ....... . .
.:::::...::..:::: ::..: :.: :::,::::;. ::;::::H: :/H: ,,:;. .: :::;:::::::: KFactOiC 0070 UnaccepmbiY Low. ::;: ;:.
lIi:j:::ll.::::::/::::::::i:i.j;:.i::'il!I.:li!i::!i::ii::::i::::: ;::::::;::;:::::::.o:FaCtot::: 0:568 .::::;:;.:;::; :::::::: :..i:.::Hi.:::: : ::';. :;. :
'li!llil(liii!li!i!i!il'ili.l;m!!!!i:!II~~.I~~i!!1 ~::.i;:i":I: .i:: i,..iimiiii.:ii:I:III: 1:(
,,:::~:,,";::::: : ::::.:: ::. :.: . ::: ::::::: :.:.:: : ::::. :: .:::HHii1:::;::::HH:. <:!y::: <:::'::H . .... ::: .":,, : .:::::: :
NrJ'~~:~~!~;I~jii!' """'}'i'J':"'ii' ,; ,i:::, Ili'/:!I!; ii.. ·
::=::: :!::!::::.:::.;:ii~~~~~d~~~i=~~~~:;:L ~ :;;:;.;;;.:::::: ::::::::1:. \:1/. ':":;: :::
::HH:::::U::::::;;;:::.::::::::;:;::::: '::,; ::.::;::::::::::::::-::::;:: .:...,=,:::::,~. . .:;:: ::::. :.. ;:;: ::.:: :.. ...: <<.: .;.:: ::
:::::lill:i::::::Y/:P:: ::::!y:.:.: .:::. :...,:. .. :: .: .:ArteliaJpl~:::: 2 :::::.: .:~:;:. G:1U! : . ":.i:: .:: :{< .. U:
::.11:!11:::::::: ::::;:'.:!i:.:!::::::jl::.I::i':ii;:i.;:For~:.~'ow..S..~:.dt~:~~;~.:::::..~..::::.:3~~::..:;:::::;.;:::;:::.::; :: .;.,. :
: m::::;:::::; .:::::iliE/::::=.:>::::::iH :<::.: .:.:::I:I:::E:=::~n:::I~!:I:i:~.:::.~;r{:: :::..: .:.:::::: .:: :....;:: ::
:.::;,::m::::;: .!;;:. ,:::i;):U:;:W i: :.:/:: ::::!~: :.::;:::::l~ji:i~ii~;::.OCb:Pi~iit::':;!:l:;;::::~;4Pi#W~Ii:;{~:~:::..t::t;::::il . :;\:. :: ~::.. :.::.:::./ ::
..... -:iH.::::: .... ...:;:::H:::.. ..::::::: "'....b~::~..{tP'~.n;::!''':m. ..AO..~h..:~:jOjrrJ:\:::' .:':'::;'-":."" . ..
!';;;;::!":':"!":!:';":!::::!':'::[;:",,~~=T:)~~";'':[!''''';';:'!'.' ·
~~J'r:~~I~'~~~~~~~~.,::,,!!::'~m!:"::!:!ll~'~'~'~I!!::;!!/::;!!,:;. :.!., ·
::)H. ... .. -::: .. ..... . .. ::~"::~;:S... yp ...... ...... .!::: . ...... . ::,.:: :::::miL. :.:m
n:::C::::i:::.::::!i::::::U: ::: /::::::::::'::;::::'>1:~~~~I.S~~U a :7.~:~~~~~jt~: /> ::
:::C. .. . ;:::::... H::-:::' ........ .,:$~m.qyt:le.lengt,ti:: 111 . ....... .......... .
.::!:i.:::i..;;,".:..?:;:;::.'::r~~i~~.~~~~~.~~.:.::::;::::::.~:6.!. : .:--.:. :;:: :: <::.:.:.. <::; ';: .:( ;:r:;: ::;: ::::::::.
I L {
.
.
776
1,348
1,283
25.3
17.7
63.8
2
2
2
118
132
131
3
3
3
.
1/2-
SUPPORT DATA FOR ART-PLAN LEVEL OF SERVICE FSl'1AMTE
West BI'OlIdway Street (CR42') from Red Bq lAke RCNId. to lAke Jessup Drive
Oviedo MarkdpJace DR!
.
KlOO
Dally Peak-Boar -J
Date Peak-Bour Volume Volume Ratio
11.17.98 4:00 - 5:00 20,682 1,237 0.060
11-18-98 4:00. 5:00 19,183 1,295 0.068
11-19-98 4:00 - 5:00 17,294 1,293 0.075
11.20-98 4:00 - 5:00 17,800 1,271 0.071
Ave...- N/A 18740 N/A 0.068
Model Output CoIIversiOl1 Factor (MOCF) =
Average peak to daily ratio =
Bdm...t...n Kl00 = .068/0.97 =
0.97
0.068
0.0701
D FlIdor
Peak-Boar Peak Off-Peak D
Se2meDt Volmne Direction Direction FlIdor
11-17-98 1,237 703 534 0.568
11-18-98 1,295 739 556 0.571
11-19.98 1,293 713 580 0.551
11-20-98 1,271 739 532 0.581
Aver82e 1.274 724 551 0.568
D Factor"
0.568
Peak-Bour Fador
.
Peak-Bour 15 Minute eriod Peak-Bour
Set!meat Volume 1st :lad 3n1 4th Factor
11.17.98 1,237 324 301 318 294 0.95
11.18-98 1,295 329 322 324 320 0.98
11-19-98 1,293 328 329 330 309 0.98
11-20-98 1,271 319 311 323 318 0.98
A~ N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.98
Peak-Boar Fadore
0.98
Percent Tams From Esclusive Lanes - Peak-Direc:tioD
Percent TIIIDlI From Eulasive lADes - Off -Peak Diredicm
Total
A roach
1898
1662
1144
704
clasive
Tarns
401
715
224
1340
%
21.1%
43.0"10
19.6%
28.5-1.
Total Dcladve
Intersec:UOD ADDroacb Tams %
Wimer SDrin2s Blvd. 776 196 25.3%
Oviedo Marketlllace Blvd. 1348 238 17.7%
Red au.. Lake Rd. 1283 819 63.8%
Avenure 3407 1253 36.r/e
r/C Ratio - Peak Directioa
r/C Ratio - Off-Peak Direction
Cyde
glC = (0.814+.524)12 ..
0.669
glC .. (0.557+.168)12 .. 0.363
Source:
G1attiDg Ja.cksoo Kercher Anglin Lopez RiDebart, Inc.
.
/13
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 06-07-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
Streets: (E-W) Oviedo Marketplace
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
(N-S) SR426
File Name: OM2905.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
=======================================================================
Eastbound
L T R
Westbound
L T R
Northbound
L T R
Southbound
L T R
-~-- ---- ----
No. Lanes
Volumes
Lane W (ft)
RTOR Vols
Lost Time
2
158
12.0
o
1
460
12.0
120
- 3.00
o
o
o
o
o
2
6110
12.0
1
g3~
.0
o
3.00
o
3.00
3.00 3.00
3.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4
EB Left * NB Left
Thru Thru
Right * Right
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left
Thru Thru
Right Right
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right * WB Right
Green 10.0A Green 28.0A 80.0A
Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0
5::::_~:~~~~~~~::~__:~~~:_:~~~~~~~~~_~=~:=~_!=_!:_!~___-----------
Intersection Performance Summary
Adj Sat v/c g/C
Flow Ratio Ratio
5
6
7
8
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
.
Lane
Mvmts
Group:
Cap
Delay
LOS
Approach:
Delay LOS
EB L 322 3539 0.532 0.091 38.4 D 12.4 B
R 1583 1583 0.226 1.000 0.0 A
NB L 778 3539 0.559 0.220 30.3 D 7.5 B
T 3217 3725 0.514 ~ 1.5 A
SB T 2314 3725 0.530 9.3 B 8.3 B
R 1163 1583 0.216 . 35 3.6 A
Intersection Delay = 8.5 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.537
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
/1+
.
.
.
HOM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 06-07-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
Streets: (E-W) Winter Springs Blvd
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
(N-S) SR426
File Name: OM3005.HC9
11-24-98 pm
=======================================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
---- ---- ---- ----
No. Lanes 1 1 1 0 > 1 1 &~ 1~~~ ~~
Volumes 219 10 481 58 13 15
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 120 0 70
Lost Time 3.00 3 . 00- 3 . 00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4
EB Left * NB Left
Thru * Thru
Right * Right
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left
Thru * Thru
Right * Right
Peds Peds
NB Right * EB Right * *
SB Right * WB Right * *
Green 20.0A Green 28.0A 56.0A
Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0
:::::_~:~~:~~-~~::~--=~~~:_:~~~~~:~~~-~:~::~-~:_~~-~~--------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Adj Sat v/c g/C
Flow Ratio Ratio
5
6
8
7
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Lane
Mvrnts
Approach:
Delay LOS
Group:
Cap
Delay
LOS
EB L 247 1325 0.935 0.186 59.2 E 22.5 C
T 347 1863 0.032 0.186 25.4 D
R 1583 1583 0.240 1. 000 0.0 A
WB LT 320 1718 0.234 0.186 26.5 D 21.8 C
R 1583 1583 0.010 1. 000 0.0 A
NB L 870 3539 0.882 0.246 35.2 D 18.4 C
T 1421 1863 0.702 CO.7~ 5.7 B
R 1583 1583 0.004 1.0 0.0 A
SB L 112 227 0.018 0.492 9.9 B 13.8 B
T 916 1863 0.667 <-0 .492 :;> 16.0 C
R 1113 1583 0.117 0.703 3.7 A
Intersection Delay = 18.2 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 see Critical v/c(x) = 0.778
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
If~
HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 06-07-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
Streets: (E-W) SR426
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
(N-S) Lake Jessup
File Name: OM3105.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
=======================================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
---- ---- ---- ---- -- -- ---- ----
No. Lanes 1 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 1
Volumes 11 545 52 79 97 45 76 63 108
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
-:-
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *,
Peds Peds
WB Left * * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right * * WB Right
Green 9.0A 42.0A Green 19.0A
Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 .
:::=:_~:~~:~~_~4 sec~_:~:~:_:~~~~::~~~_~:~::~_~=_~~_~:______________
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB L 300 1770 0.787 0.679 21.3 C 33.0 D
TR 965 1843 1.003 ~. 524 J 35.8 D
WB L 300 1770 0.040 0.679 10.0 B 10.5 B
TR 963 1838 0.653 0.524 10.5 B
NB LTR 312 1250 0.742 0.250 25.0 C 25.0 C
SB LT 168 674 0.866 0.250 43.2 E 24.3 C
R 1526 1583 0.075 0.964 0.0 A
Intersection Delay = 25.0 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.964
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
'f (P
HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 06-07-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
.
Streets: (E-W) Red Bug Lake Road
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 wiht project
(N-S)SR426
File Name: OM1105.HC9
11-24-98 pm
=======================================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound
L T R L T R L T R
---- ----
No. Lanes 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1
Volumes 584 1106 306 254 1006 398 217 497 . 390
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12 . 0" 12. 0
RTOR Vols 80 130 125
-. Lost Time 3.00 3 . 0 O' 3. 00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
3.00
Southbound
L T R
200
3.00 3.00 3.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right * * EB Right * *
. SB Right * * WB Right * *
Green 24.0A 40.0A Green 27.0A 20 . OA
Yellow/AR ~ 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0
Cycle Length: 13 eC~Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 702 3539 0.901 0.198 43.7 E 45.4 E
T 1.194 3725 1.023 0.321 54.6 E
R 1196 1583 0.199 0.756 3.0 A
WB L 351 1770 0.760 0.198 38.4 D 31.6 D
T 1194 3725 0.931 0.321 37.2 D
R 1196 1583 0.236 0.756 3.1 A
NB L 392 1770 0.582 0.221 31.1 D 30.6 D
T 626 3725 0.878 0.168 43.8 E
R 1124 1583 0.248 0.710 4.3 A
SB L 392 1770 0.880 0.221 45.9 E 32.3 D
T 626 3725 0.818 ~ . 168-=:> 39.8 D
R 1124 1583 0.272 .710 4.4 A
Intersection Delay = 36.4 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.935
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
/17
Conducted by: Accurate Traffic Counts, Inc.
volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 1
********************************************************************************
.
Data File D1117002.PRN
station 000000000002
Identification 000000691015 Interval
Start date Nov 17, 98 Start time
Stop date Nov 17, 98 Stop time
City/Town OViedo County
Location SR-426, west of Lake Jessup Avenue
*******************************************************************************
Nov 17
Westbound Volume for Lane 1
15 minutes
00:00
24:00
Seminole
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11
End Time
15
30
45
00
Hr Total
00
19
01
7
7
3
2
21
02
4
5
7
5
12
03
2
3
3
4
3
4
4
11
04
7
5
11
14
37
165
05
24
42
45
54
76
107
100
207
06
271
150
141
146
708
07
127
181
194
150
652
08
191
150
118
103
562
09
123
124
110
123
480
10
143
121
118
136
518
End Time
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
22
23
12
15 173
30 136
45 147
00 132
Hr Total 588
13
132
119
142
127
520
130
126
132
93
481
22
14
152
129
111
138
530
15
143
143
138
139
563
16
145
120
129
140
534
490
17
124
130
99
101
454
18
281
19
80
67
66
68
196
20
46
48
45
57
155
21
49
40
36
30
40
26
15
15
13
11
10
9
.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
96
43
24 Hour Total 8127
AM peak hour begins: 06:45 AM peak volume: 769 Peak hour factor: 0.71
PM peak hour begins : 12:00 PM peak volume: 588 Peak hour factor: 0.85
*******************************************************************************
Nov 17
Eastbound Volume for Lane 2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10
11
End Time
15
30
45
00
Hr Total
00
12
12
6
8
38
01
7
7
3
2
19
02
1
5
3
2
11
03
5
5
2
o
12
04
2
3
5
4
14
122
05
8
17
27
70
90
188
155
198
06
538
310
272
284
07
294
353
418
415
08
364
350
270
267
09
292
284
315
293
631 1404 1480 1251 1184
267
190
164
334
955
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
22
23
End Time
15
30.
45
00
162
136
256
316
Hr Total 870
12
119
139
112
105
475
13
103
176
191
156
626
14
139
137
156
160
592
15
147
137
175
159
618
16
179
181
189
154
703
17
148
158
106
114
526
18
103
87
84
80
354
19
282
20
86
77
62
57
223
21
60
71
44
48
110
46
20
25
19
22
10
14
9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
55
.
24 Hour Total 12555
AM peak hour begins: 08:15 AM peak volume: 1550 Peak hour factor: 0.93
PM peak hour begins : 12:00 PM peak volume: 870 Peak hour factor: 0.69
*******************************************************************************
liS
en
.
.
...:.
.
Conducted by: Accurate Traffic Counts, Inc.
volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 1
********************************************************************************
Data File D1ll8002.PRN
Station 000000000002
Identification 000000691015 Interval
Start date Nov 18, 98 Start time
Stop date Nov 18, 98 Stop time
City/Town Oviedo County
Location SR-426, west of Lake Jessup Avenue
*******************************************************************************
Nov 18
Westbound Volume for Lane 1
15 minutes
00:00
24:00
Seminole
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11
End Time
15
30
45
00
Hr Total
00
4
5
7
10
26
01
8
4
2
7
21
02
1
6
10
4
21
03
5
6
8
5
24
04
5
12
10
14
41
178
05
21
28
64
65
61
135
120
178
06
253
135
138
137
663
07
149
163
196
154
662
08
156
122
150
114
542
09
114
107
113
120
454
10
158
280
157
126
721
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
23
End Time
15 153
30 112
45 113
00 122
Hr Total 500
12
134
131
116
110
491
13
125
115
105
100
445
14
121
126
121
122
490
15
152
137
128
127
544
16
140
140
143
133
556
494
17
139
110
101
96
446
18
86
101
87
51
325
19
281
20
51
64
94
72
171
21
62
42
35
32
22
32
19
23
15
15
8
7
8
89
38
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
24 Hour Total 8223
AM peak hour begins : 11:00 AM peak volume: 721 Peak hour factor : 0.64
PM peak hour begins: 17:00 PM peak volume: 556 Peak hour factor: 0.97
*******************************************************************************
Nov 18
Eastbound Volume for Lane 2
End T i.me
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11
15
30
45
00
Hr Total
00
13
11
8
10
42
01
9
5
4
7
25
02
4
1
7
7
19
03
4
3
9
8
24 27
04
6
5
11
5
05
14
13
19
18
64
208
06
33
47
55
73
174
163
255
276
07
327
396
383
452
08
402
328
311
278
09
284
261
276
289
18
868 1558 1319 1110
21
10
247
94
100
102
543
End Time
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
22
23
15
30
45
00
114
118
123
114
Hr Total 469
12
III
167
195
149
622
13
139
112
124
106
481
14
138
106
148
143
535
15
161
151
160
169
641
16
189
182
181
187
739
17
181
150
106
138
575
109
80
73
76
338
19
327
20
89
81
79
78
251
99
62
49
41
114
43
28
26
17
18
19
16
8
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
61
24 Hour Total 10960
AM peak hour begins: 08:15 AM peak volume: 1633 Peak hour factor: 0.90
PM peak hour begins: 17:00 PM peak volume: 739 Peak hour factor: 0.98
*******************************************************************************
I 2--0
Conducted by: Accurate Traffic Counts, Inc.
Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 2
********************************************************************************
.
Data File Dll17002.PRN
Station 000000000002
Identification : 000000691015 Interval
Start date Nov 17, 98 Start time
Stop date Nov 17, 98 Stop time
City/TOwn Oviedo County
Location SR-426, west of Lake Jessup Avenue
*******************************************************************************
15 minutes
00:00
24:00
Seminole
Nov 17
Total Volume for All Lanes
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
End Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11
--------
15 19 11 3 8 9 32 166 809 421 555 415 410
30 19 12 8 9 8 59 295 460 534 500 408 311
45 9 10 6 6 16 72 255 413 612 388 425 282
00 10 7 6 11 18 124 405 430 565 370 416 470
--------
Hr Total 57 40 23 34 51 287 1121 2112 2132 1813 1664 1473
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
--------
15 335 251 233 291 290 324 272 183 132 109 86 35
30 272 258 302 266 280 301 288 154 125 111 46 21
45 403 254 323 267 313 318 205 150 107 80 40 24
00 448 232 249 298 298 294 215 148 114 78 34 18 .
--------
Hr Total 1458 995 1107 1122 1181 1237 980 635 478 378 206 98
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
24 Hour Total 20682
AM peak hour begins : 08:15 AM peak volume : 2266 Peak hour factor : 0.93
PM peak hour begins : 12: 00 PM peak volume : 1458 Peak hour factor : 0.81
*******************************************************************************
.
fl7
.
.
.
Conducted by: Accurate Traffic Counts, Inc.
Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 2
********************************************************************************
Data File Dll18002.PRN
Station 000000000002
Identification 000000691015 Interval
Start date Nov 18, 98 Start time
Stop date Nov 18, 98 Stop time
City/Town OViedo County
Location SR-426, west of Lake Jessup Avenue
*******************************************************************************
Nov 18
01
02
Total Volume for All Lanes
15 minutes
00:00
24:00
Seminole
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11
End Time
15
30
45
00
Hr Total
00
17
16
15
20
68
17
9
6
14
5
7
17
11
03
9
9
17
13
48
04
11
17
21
19
68
242
05
35
41
83
83
94
182
175
251
06
07
08
09
10
46
40
427
298
393
413
476
559
579
606
558
450
461
392
398
368
389
409
405
374
257
228
17
702 1531 2220 1861 1564 1264
320
260
207
234
1021
18
195
181
160
127
663
19
20
21
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
23
End Time
15
30
45
00
267
230
236
236.
Hr Total
969
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12
245
298
311
259
1113
13
14
15
313
288
288
296
1185
16
329
322
324
320
1295
140
145
173
150
161
104
84
73
22
75
47
49
32
33
27
23
16
264
227
229
206
259
232
269
265
608
422
203
99
926
1025
24 Hour Total 19183
AM peak hour begins: 08:15 AM peak volume: 2302 Peak hour factor: 0.95
PM peak hour begins: 17:00 PM peak volume: 1295 Peak hour factor: 0.98
*******************************************************************************
I ,.,. I
COnducted by: Accurate Traffic Counts, Inc.
Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 1
********************************************************************************
.
Data File D1119002.PRN
station 000000000002
Identification 000000691015 Interval
start date Nov 19, 98 start time
Stop date Nov 19, 98 Stop time
City/TOwn Oviedo County
Location SR-426, west of Lake Jessup Avenue
*******************************************************************************
Nov 19
Westbound Volume for Lane 1
15 minutes
00:00
24:00
Seminole
End Time
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11
15
30
45
00
Hr Total
00
23
01
9
7
3
4
16
02
2
6
5
3
12
03
2
1
4
5
2
4
10
2
04
6
8
13
17
44
05
22
34
48
64
168
06
79
118
111
171
479
07
253
159
138
162
712
08
167
184
172
138
661
09
150
120
101
133
504
10
116
102
127
93
438
105
101
107
121
434
End Time
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
23
12
15 121
30 116
45 124
00 115
Hr Total 476
13
92
98
111
106
407
14
122
126
109
104
461
18
15
125
119
103
135
482
16
142
116
125
137
520
157
144
143
136
580
17
18
100
82
74
53
309
19
20
21
55
62
68
46
190
22
67
40
48
35
26
27
17
16
13
11
5
9
.
130
131
101
91
453
231
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
86
38
24 Hour Total 7742
AM peak hour begins: 06:45 AM peak volume: 721 Peak hour factor: 0.71
PM peak hour begins : 16:45 PM peak volume: 581 Peak hour factor: 0.93
*******************************************************************************
Nov 19
Eastbound Volume for Lane 2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10
11
End Time 00
15
30
45
00
Hr Total
11
11
11
7
40
01
7
5
4
5
21
02
2
4
2
5
13
03
2
5
3
3
13
04
2
4
8
4
18
05
7
12
18
20
57
177
06
30
29
57
61
102
74
78
91
07
125
137
223
275
08
283
223
247
282
09
254
260
278
234
760 1035 1026
269
245
261
206
981
End Time
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
22
23
15
30
45
00
--------
108
100
72
106
Hr Total 386
12
109
119
110
108
446
13
100
164
202
150
616
14
131
126
149
131
537
15
158
161
148
177
644
16
171
185
187
170
17
148
154
117
121
713
345
18
540
19
123
109
93
96
421
303
20
90
67
75
71
256
21
77
75
58
46
132
45
26
39
22
26
22
18
6
72
.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
24 Hour Total 9552
AM peak hour begins : 09:45 AM peak volume : 1074 Peak hour factor : 0.95
PM peak hour begins : 16:45 PM peak volume: 720 Peak hour factor: 0.96
*******************************************************************************
L1-1-
-
.
Conducted by: Accurate Traffic Counts, Inc.
Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 2
********************************************************************************
Data File D1119002.PRN
Station 000000000002
Identification 000000691015 Interval
Start date Nov 19, 98 Start time
Stop date Nov 19, 98 Stop time
City/Town OViedo County
Location SR-426, west of Lake Jessup Avenue
*******************************************************************************
15 minutes
00:00
24:00
Seminole
Nov 19
Total Volume for All Lanes
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-" End Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11
--------
15 20 9 4 4 8 29 109 355 292 433 370 374
30 18 11 5 9 12 46 147 233 321 343 362 346
45 14 9 6 13 21 66 168 216 395 348 405 368
00 11 8 10 5 21 84 232 253 413 415 327 327
--------
Hr Total 63 37 25 31 62 225 656 1057 1421 1539 1464 1415
~.
.
.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
--------
15 229 201 222 256 300 328 278 223 145 144 71 39
30 216 217 290 245 277 329 285 191 129 115 53 33
45 196 221 311 252 273 330 218 167 143 106 56 23
00 221 214 254 266 314 306 212 149 117 81 38 15
--------
Hr Total 862 853 1077 1019 1164 1293 993 730 534 446 218 110
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
24 Hour Total 17294
AM peak hour begins : 08:30 AM peak volume : 1584 Peak hour factor : 0.91
PM peak hour begins : 16:45 PM peak volume : 1301 Peak hour factor : 0.99
*******************************************************************************
I },.--.3
Conducted by: Accurate Traffic Counts, Inc.
Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 1
********************************************************************************
.
Data File D1120002.PRN
Station 000000000002
Identification 000000691015 Interval
Start date Nov 20, 98 Start time
Stop date Nov 20, 98 Stop time
City/Town Oviedo County
Location SR-426, west of Lake Jessup Avenue
*******************************************************************************
Nov 20
Westbound Volume for Lane 1
15 minutes
00:00
24:00
Seminole
End Time
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11
15
30
45
00
Hr Total
00
29
01
9
8
8
4
11
02
3
3
4
1
15
03
6
2
3
4
3
2
3
6
14
04
6
8
7
16
37
192
05
22
48
47
75
58
107
111
161
06
264
151
146
138
699
07
151
176
173
166
666
08
160
139
105
127
531
09
116
112
112
130
470
10
133
123
124
120
500
End Time
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
23
12
13
15 140 110
30 135 125
45 118 124
00 138. 107
Hr Total 531 466
14
130
125
129.
91
475
140
142
142
124
548
15
141
156
146
151
594
16
123
134
129
146
532
437
17
122
135
126
113
496
18
116
98
75
67
356
19
241
20
60
61
81
39
239
21
68
65
57
49
151
22
48
51
26
26
21
21
21
25
.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
88
24 Hour Total 8318
AM peak hour begins : 06:45 AM peak volume: 722 Peak hour factor : 0.68
PM peak hour begins : 16:00 PM peak volume: 594 Peak hour factor: 0.95
*******************************************************************************
Nov 20
Eastbound Volume for Lane 2
End Time
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11
15
30
45
00
Hr Total
00
9
13
9
7
38
01
8
4
5
4
21
02
3
4
2
1
10
03
o
6
3
4
13
04
2
2
1
2
7
05
7
14
12
23
56
158
06
24
28
42
64
87
88
88
101
07
110
137
108
121
08
09
227 266
276. 265
260 252
286 253
476 1049 1036
10
114
215
267
276
872
End Time
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
22
23
15
30
45
00
118
138
102
102
Hr Total 460
12
90
137
121
123
471
13
116
192
187
161
14
125
130
135
175
656 '565
15
166
147
139
166
618
16
196
177
194
172
739
17
157
147
125
122
551
364
18
105
83
103
88
379
19
307
20
89
74
67
77
265
21
72
78
50
65
70
61
50
52
42
31
34
31
233 . 138
.
--------------------------------------------------~----------------------------
24 Hour Total 9482
AM peak hour begins : 09:15 AM peak volume: 1088 Peak hour factor: 0.95
PM peak hour begins: 17:00 PM peak volume: 739 Peak hour factor: 0.94
*******************************************************************************
,1,,'f
.
.
.
Conducted by: Accurate Traffic Counts, Inc.
Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 2
********************************************************************************
Data-File Dl120002.PRN
Station 000000000002
Identification 000000691015 Interval
Start date Nov 20, 98 Start time
Stop date Nov 20, 98 Stop time
City/Town Oviedo County
Location SR-426, west of Lake Jessup Avenue
*******************************************************************************
Nov 20
00
03
Total Volume for All Lanes
05
15 minutes
00:00
24:00
Seminole
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11
End Time
15
30
45
00
Hr Total
01
02
18
21
17
11
9
6
5
5
3
8
6
10
04
06
07
08
09
10
11
7
9
5
8
10
8
18
29
62
59
98
82
135
153
225
351
239
234
239
261
313
281
287
387
415
365
413
382
377
364
383
247
338
391
396
67
32
25
27
44
248
16
18
595 1063 1142 1580 1506 1372
17
319
311
323
318
279
282
251
235
221
181
178
155
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--'--
End Time
15 258
30 273
45 220
00 240
Hr Total 991
12
13
14
15
1271
1047
735
19
20
21
22
23
200
262
245
230
265
272
277
299
307
303
285
317
149
135
148
116
140
143
107
114
118
112
76
78
63
52
55
56
246
317
316
252
937
1113
1212
548
504
384
226
1131
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
24 Hour Total 17800
AM peak hour begins : 09:00 AM peak volume: 1580 Peak hour factor: 0.95
PM peak hour begins: 17:00 PM peak volume: 1271 Peak hour factor: 0.98
*******************************************************************************
t )..~
113
Mitchell R9mmock Road
SR426 - SR434
;....
Page 126
Traffic Impact Study
Oviedo Marketplace
. August 20,1999
.
.
.
c::l
.
.
.::::.::::;:::,::':::::t'rI?:::jt~::::i:IjJt.i/':':H,::;tt\)j,::)t,M::i:/:j:i:t.::... "~2..:t:.::iU:;:t~I" .' i:::::'::.::::\':'f,r:t::?:t:f'{':;::'r::f":.:::::::.:::::::::::/:,:==:::::::: ;:::::.,::::.1;::::.,:;:
..... .::::::;:: ......::::::. .......::;:;f::;::,..................,:",t::':;:,:::::::::;;:l:,:,:i,:::,:,:,:f;":. ::~:.:,,~~:__..rj ~;t.,:,',:::,:,',:::::,:::::::::::::::':::...::,"t,"..:::t::.:::::':.:.:jj!j:::::::::....:.. ...........::::,:;:;:.. ....
:DESCRiPTlON::::::.:.:::.:::un:::':~::.:~: :: :::::::::::::':::::::::::';' :',::::.:'::':::,;:::;::::;,::::::::;::::::;::::::'Y::::==':: c/> ::::.:,.;::: .: ::': "::
>':::::~>': 'X:::::::::':: :: ':;:;:': ;'.':jj::;;;:, ;:.:.::::.:;::;}:if''-'ii{N:''i:':, :.' .:.. ...... ... . . ... : ::: :~ :'::: :,.::,;::;:::::::' ;:; .
':'H/::':::j:": :.. ::":,::,:::.. . ':/:,nj:/... . : :::,:.~.... arne.: Mitchell Hammock Rpad . ...:.:..:.:... ...... :'.. .
.:::::'>:::::, :::::::;::!:~:W:::::l":::::":::::):=:::.:.:":U::::::: :::::::::::':::mf:;~:: ::: '.::i:::.: :;\::::;':':=:;'.) ..:'.:
. ::...... ... . . .:::..;:.HL,,;:', ... /::L:,:' .. ... ... .. . ~::::;;:... . ... ......... ..
: :::::::::.:::':: ::::::H:::::::'::,'::::::':);; mT::I:/!~1~:~~=~:: ~:s':U:~ ;;'::::'-:::::. "::';: ; . :::. .:::
";:c' ':1'" :~:~~ ... . ":,,, .HHH. H.... ... ... . .. ......... .. ......
(;!:!::ii!:::! ::1: :'j.::i:;iii;i:ji..iiiiii!:::)iiUiiii!:::yWi?N:::: ~:~~:~dSheet :'" .: .': :-.=:..-.:
":C: iillYL:":::::'::':': ::. ::. 'jl;( ililUlU ,'p.'; .: ...::. :.. .:::::: .,:.. .:-:: ,::::::, :::: ";: ::::: :: : : : :""
~~~~rM~~E,~Sm:'~m0~:>:/::':"'.':: .,:i:::!n:i:::::::::::: :H::::/::::: i::::'::' ,.:::'::,:: . .,::. . ,.:;:;.' :':..:::::::.::::'. ~;:::
.. ..... ... ..... .... :::::,::::::........ ..:::... ~,. }::::::;=:::::,:. .:::::..... :::::. .::::.. .. . :::::::::::.:::::c:::, ..
::. ':: :::::'~':<<':'::m::; ;::U:::::: ::::E:;:: ;: ::.'.j t,::;: ::UAAD1L .... " ::,: ::,; ; :..... . : /: ::::..~<j:,.>,,;::
::.::::.::::'::Y::.::,:: i::;i:: :::::m;:i:: ::: :::::::!: ::.':: ::i.::::::.:' ::~:F.~~::: 0.091 . ;;:::::'. ::.:: ":::j:: !::!)':i::: ::;<:;;:=:::
;::H: :"::::: :i::'::: <::::::.:::m::::',:::':;::':m'::..::::~~~~~~:~=::: ~.:: ,/:;:. ;:j:C :::I:I:':iji': :;.I:IIV : OJ::. .
~::':'::':V:;..:t::i:ui::.::::!'I:::u:~.~=~~o/C::. 1:::0 t=::::::u":' ::.!!.i:;;;. ::;~:;"::';'::':%:;( u ,j:;;..
::::::,
:: , : : : : ~ .. :
.::::::
. m. .,11::::::,:,.. .#1siiiiiilili5!i . ",. .... ..
iilil{'ii::ii:iifl:l[i['ili!mlli'!!liiiilul!:I"ii'li,.1.~i:!I:;::fli::ill"!I,llf,,i'
'~~~~':~m~i~~~~:iiilii!;';:,i':'::i!":i'i'~,:i"i'i',,:i:',i:i!llff,'i
:::: :.: i Ttj: ::::~:. :-: ':::::..: '.:::~I:rype.geal(:{>'ireCitiQ,if: m:t1'2'3i4'5'6):>:::":":/i":-'::':':: :
:: <;/!:;H::::::::::: ::::::':/::~;'Jfype pff.~R~~DiteCti~:: 3 ::,;:,::::U::::::::.:UjW',::H::':i:::::::'UC.:: :'
;,,:::::;:::j;: : :::::-.:':'::i::::'::=::::;':';: :: ::::,:i~.:::l~e:~!:~m,::. a i:~:IIII~j~~~~',~:7m:E:.::::.
.... ..' ........ .......... .. .. w::~em.~e Lengtti... 111 .'::,::,::::/ """::::::::"'::'::::c ...y::
::i::!':::iil:;:'::::'.:ii:!::!;:!':::ji~i~~.~~~:~~Tt~:~ffi:i'IT2ITFO~~ :'::,:",:' .I:::..!:;::::::.::::!::....:!:I::II.,::.I:I.'.II.::;.i:"::~:.
.
/ J..,"
-
.
~
.
--
.
/2,8
-
,
SUPPORT DATA FOR ART-PLAN LEVEL OF SERVICE ESI'lAMTE
MItcheIlIlammock Road &om SR426 to SR434
Oviedo MarIretpIace DR!
.
K100 -
0.568
D Factor =
0.091
Peak-Hour Factor"
.0.925
PeJUBt TanIs From Exclusive Lanes - Peak-Diredion
r/C Ratio - Peak Direction
Cycle
glC = (0.814+.524Y2 =
0.669
SO\IJlle:
Glatting Jackson Km:ber ADg1in Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
.
.
Percmt Tams From EJ:dasive lAmes - Off -Peak DirectioD
%
39.4%
39.4%
Total EJ:clllsive
Intenec:tion Approach Toms .".
Aloma Avenue (SR426) 1658 652 39.3%
Avel'lU"e 16S8 652 39.3%
gle Ratio - Off-Peak Direction
glC = (0.557+. 168Y2 = 0.363
/2e;
HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 06-09-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
Streets: (E-W) Mitchell Hammock Rd
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
(N-S) SR434
File Name: OM1805.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
No. Lanes 1 2 < 0 2 3 < 0 1 2 0
Volumes 210 959 137 582 788 244 200 593
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00. 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4
EB Left * * NB Left
Thru * Thru
Right * Right
Peds Peds
WB Left * * SB Left
Thru * Thru
Right * Right
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 12.0A 43.0A Green 26.0A 30.0A
Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0
Cycle Length~~ecs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6
------------~-----------------~-----------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Adj Sat v/c g/C
Flow Ratio Ratio
5
6
7
8
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
.
Lane
Mvrnts
Group:
Cap
Delay
LOS
Approach:
Delay LOS
EB L 236 1770 0.775 0.473 31.0 D 39.8 D
T 1300 3725 1.030 <[.34V 54.1 E
R 1350 1583 0.337 .853 1.3 A
WB L 236 1770 0.936 0.473 54.1 E 39.9 D
TR 1275 3656 0.950 0.349 37.3 D
NB L 741 3539 0.852 0.209 38.3 D 36.9 D
TR 1337 5390 0.894 0.248 36.1 D
SB L 428 1770 0.493 0.481 15.9 C 26.8 D
T 924 3725 0.709 0.248 30.4 D
Intersection Delay = 37.1 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.948
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
/36
I!D
HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 06-09-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
.
Streets: (E-W) Red Bug Lake Road
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
(N-S) SR426
File Name: OM1105.HC9
11-24-98 pm
======= == === = === = = == ============= === = == == == == == = ==== ===== === == =====,= == =
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 .2 1
Volumes 584 1106 406 217 497 390 328 464 491
Lane W (ft) 12..0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 80 125 200
.. Lost Time 3.00 3 . 0 0- 3. 0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
------------------------------------------------------------------~----
.
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4
EB Left * NB Left
~ru * ~ru
Right * Right
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left
~ru * Thru
Right * Right
Peds Peds
NB Right * * EB Right * *
SB Right * * WB Right * *
Green 24.0A 40.0A Green 27.0A 20.0A
Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0
Cycle Length:rr3~ecs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6
------~------~----------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Adj Sat v/c g/C
Flow Ratio Ratio Delay
5
6
7
8
*
*
*
*
*
*
Lane
Mvrnts
Group:
Cap
LOS
Approach:
Delay LOS
EB L 702 3539 0.901 0.198 43.7 E 43.4 E
T 1194 3725 1.023 0.321 54.6 E
R 1196 1583 0.287 0.756 3.3 A
WB L 351 1770 0.760 0.198 38.4 D 31.6 D
T 1194 3725 0.931 ~ 37.2 D
R 1196 1583 0.236 0.756 3.1 A
NB L 392 1770 0.582 0.221 31.1 D 30.6 D
T 626 3725 0.878 0.168 43.8 E
R 1124 1583 0.248 0.710 4.3 A
SB L 392 1770 0.880 0.221 45.9 E 32.3 D
T 626 3725 0.818 0.168 39.8 D
R 1124 1583 0.272 0.710 4.4 A
Intersection Delay = 35.8 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.935
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
/.:!:> J
Page 132
INTERSECTION ANALYSES, YEAR 2005
Traffic Impact Study
Oviedo Marketplace
August 20,1999
.
.
.
-
. INDEX. TO INTERSECTIONS
"
No. Intersection ~
1 Red Bug Lake Road @ SR436 133
2 Red Bug Lake Road @ Dodd Road 134
3 Red Bug Lake Road @ Tuskawilla Road 135
4 Red Bug Lake Road @ Sun Drive 136
5 Red Bug Lake Road @ Citrus Road 137
6 Red Bug Lake, Road @ Slavia Road 138
7 Red Bug Lake Road @ Dovera Road 139
8 Red Bug Lake Road @ Oviedo Marketplace Blvd. 140
9 Red Bug Lake Road @ GreeneWay ramps west 141
10 Red Bug Lake Road @ GreeneWay ramps east 142
11 Red Bug Lake Road @ SR426 143
12 Mitchell Hammock Road @ Lockwood Boulevard 144
13 Tuskawilla Road @ Dike Road 145
14 Tuskawilla Road @ Lake Drive 146
15 Tuskawilla Road @ Winter Springs Boulevard 147
. 16 SR434 -@ Chapman Road 148
17 SR434 @ Alafaya Woods Boulevard 149
18 SR434 @ Mitchell Hammock Road 150
19 SR434 @ SR426 151
20 SR434 @ GreeneWay ramps east 152
21 SR434 @ GreeneWay ramps west 153
22 SR434 @ Tuskawilla Road 154
23 SR434 @ SR419 155
24 SR426 @ Tuskawilla Road 156
2S SR426 @ GreeneWay ramps west 157
26 SR426 @ GreeneWay ramps east 158
27 SR426 @ Dean Road 150
28 SR426 @ Chapman Road 160
29 SR426 @ Oviedo Marketplace Boulevard 161
30 SR426 @ Winter Springs Boulevard 162
31 SR426 @ Lake Jessup Avenue 163
32 Lockwood Boulevard @ CR419 164
Traffic Impact Study
Oviedo Marketplace
August 20,1999
.
..
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 08-17-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
.
S~reets: (E-W) Red Bug Lake Road
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
(N-S) SR436
File Name: OM0105.HC9
11-24-98 pm
=======================================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R J~~ T -~~ L T R L T R
.ttJ L _
No. Lanes 0 0 1 2 0 2 1 3 0 2 3 1
Volumes 28 1139 1159 12 3438 1355 2062 11
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left NB Left *
Thru Thru *
Right * Right
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru Thru * *
Right * Right * '*
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right * *
SB Right * WB Right * *
Green 25.0A Green 55.0A 45.0A
. Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0
Cycle Length: 139 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay J.OS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB R 1583 1583 0.018 1.000 0.0 A 0.0 A
WB L 687 3539 1.797 0.194 * * '* * IS...
R 3167 3167 0.435 1.000 0.1 A
NB L 77 227 0.169 0.338 21.0 C * * 0
T 1889 5588 2.107 0.338 * *
SB L 1426 3539 1.030 0.403 52.9 E 22.9 C
...:.. T 4261 5588 0.560 0.763 4.5 A
R 1583 1583 0.008 1.000 0.0 A
Intersection Delay = * ( sec/veh) Intersection LOS = *
(g/C)'*(V/c) is greater than one. Calculation of D1 is infeasible.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
"~I" O. S"7 ::- b"' fj
I "~1 SO; i" :: 30. S .".
.
\~~
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 08-17-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
(N-S) Dodd Road
File Name: OM0205.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
Streets: (E-W) Red Bug Lake Road
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 ~ith project
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L ~~ R L T R L T ls- L T R
~~t_ JD1-
No. Lanes 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 1
Volumes .170 1902 220 190 1518 309 224 185 258 180 140 110
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
------~-------------~--------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right * * EB Right * *
SB Right * * WB Right * *
Green 18.0A 82.0A Green 16.0A 18.0A
Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 .
Cycle Length: 154 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 230 1770 0.779 0.130 52.4 E 43.1 E
T 2032 3725 1.035 0.545 46.9 E
R 1316 1583 0.176 0.831 1.7 A
WB L 460 3539 0.448 0.130 40.5 E 19.8 C
T 2032 3725 0.826 0.545 20.8 C
R 1316 1583 0.247 0.831 1.8 A
NB L 414 3539 0.587 0.117 43.2 E 30.4 D
T 242 1863 0.806 0.130 54.1 E
R 1305 1583 0.208 0.825 1.9 A
SB L 414 3539 0.471 0.117 41.7 E 31.0 D
T 484 3725 0.318 0.130 39.4 D
R 1305 1583 0.089 0.825 1.7 A
Intersection Delay = 31.9 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.910
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
I 3.J-
~
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 08-17-1999
. Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
.
Streets: (E-W) Red Bug Lake Rd.
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
(N-S) Tuskawilla Road
File Name: OM0305.HC9
11-24-98 pm
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L ~il_ R ~~_ .;l.8_ R L T ~- im-_ T R
~J~_
No. Lanes 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1
Volumes 418 1556 271 516 1261 370 317 741 460 370 598 222
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 70 90 80 60
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3..00 3.00 3.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right * * EB Right * *
SB Right * * WB Right * *
Green 24.0A 68.0A Green 22.0A 22.0A
. Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0
Cycle Length: 156 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 590 3539 0.768 0.167 44.3 E 46.2 E
T 1671 3725 1.029 0.449 52.0 E
R 1258 1583 0.168 0.795 2.5 A
WE L 590 3539 0.948 0.167 59.6 E 32.0 D
T 1671 3725 0.833 0.449 27.2 D
R 1258 1583 0.234 0.795 2.6 A
~ NB L 544 3539 0.632 0.154 41.6 E 44.9 E
T 860 5588 0.998 0.154 65.8 F 0
R 1248 1583 0.320 0.788 3.1 A
SB L 544 3539 0.737 0.154 44.3 E 39.1 D
T 860 5588 0.805 0.154 45.1 E
R 1248 1583 0.137 0.788 2.5 A
Intersection Delay = 40.5 sec/veh Intersection LOS = E
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec .Critical v/c (x) = 0.960
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
~~ )! O. S-1: 7'ti'
. 0/1~ 8 =- o. o~..
, ~S
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 08-17-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
(N-S) Sun Drive
File Name: OM0405.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
Streets: (E-W) Red Bug Lake Road
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
=======================================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L llsl R L th2... R L T R ~-- T R
-~Q- ---- ---- ---- ----
---- ----
No. Lanes 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 < 0 1 1 < 1
Volumes 325 2155 52 17 2270 89 32 18 27 65 17 178
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left *. NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right * *
SB Right WB Right * *
Green 36.0A 71.0A Green 14 . OA 17.0A
Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0
Cycle Length: 158 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6
.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 426 1770 0.803 0.241 43.8 E 35.4 D
T 2582 5588 0.966 0.462 34.9 D
R 1142 1583 0.048 0.722 4.1 A
WB L 426 1770 0.042 0.241 29.7 D 43.7 E
T 2582 5588 1.018 0.462 45.3 E
R 1142 1583 0.082 0.722 4.2 A
.... NB L 179 1770 0.190 0.101 42.1 E 42.4 E
TR 172 1696 0.274 0.101 42.6 E
SB L 213 1770 0.319 0.120 41.4 E 43.7 E
TR 196 1628 0.572 0.120 45.3 E
R 190 1583 0.489 0.120 43.6 E
Intersection Delay = 39.7 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c (x) = 0.822
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
J 3b
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 08-17-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
.
Streets: (E-W) Red Bug Lake Road
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
(N-S)' Citrus Road
File Name: OM0505.HC9
11-24-98 pm
=======================================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L ~ R L I~~ _~1_ L T R ~~- T R
---- ----
No. Lanes 1 3 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 > 1 < 0
Volumes 263 2149 2335 292 142 1 157
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
---------------------~-------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left
Thru * * Thru
Right Right
Peds Peds
WB Left SB Left * *
Thru * Thru * *
Right * Right * *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right *
SB Right WB Right '* *
. Green 26.0A 71.0A Green 20 . OA 17.0A
Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 YellowlAR 5.0 5.0
Cycle Length: 153 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lane Group:
Mvrnts Cap
Intersection Performance Summary
Adj Sat v/c g/C
Flow Ratio Ratio Delay
LOS
Approach:
Delay . LOS
EB L 312 1770 0.887 0.176 57.2 E 14.6 B
T 3762 5588 0.661 0.673 9.8 B
WB T 2666 5588 1.014 0.477 42.5 E 38.4 D
R 1242 1583 0.247 0.784 2.9 A
SB LTR 434 1509 0.726 0.288 35.8 D 35.8 D
Intersection Delay = 27.5 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.902
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
1~7
HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 08-17-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
Streets: (E-W) Red Bug Lake Road
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
(N-S) Slavia Road
File Name: OM0605.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
=======================================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T ~-- L T R
1111-1_ Z/)_ _ Ira
No. Lanes 0 3 1 1 3 0 2 "0 1 0 0 0
Volumes 2349 300 66 1798 357 94
Lane W (ft) 12".0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left NB Left *
Thru *' Thru
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left
Thru * Thru
Right Right
Peds Peds
NB Right * EB Right *
SB Right WB Right
Green 99.0A Green 20 . OA
Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 .
Cycle Length: 129 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lane Group:
Mvrnts Cap
Intersection Performance Summary
Adj Sat v/c g/C
Flow Ratio Ratio Delay
LOS
Approach:
Delay LOS
EB T 4375 5588 0.622 0.783 4.0 A 3.6 A
R 1583 1583 0.200 1.000 0.0 A
WB L 105 134 0.658 0.783 13.3 B 3.5 A
T 4375 5588 0.476 0.783 3.2 A
NB L 604 3539 0.641 0.171 33.8 D 26.9 D
R 1583 1583 0.063 1.000 0.0 A
Intersection Delay = 5.6 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.655
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
1~8
-
HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 05-26-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
.
Streets: (E-W) Red Bug Lake Road
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
(N-S) Dovera Road
File Name: OM0705.HC9
11-24-98 pm
=======================================================================
No. Lanes
Volumes
Lane W (ft)
RTOR Vols
Lost Time
Eastbound
L T R
j~_~_ SQ'i_ ~~.r:
231
426 1625 265
12.0 12.0 12.0
80
3.00 3.00.- 3.00
Westbound
Northbound
Southbound
1?G _~__ b_~7_
2 1 1
576 8 619
12.0 12.0 12.0
250
3.00 3.00 3.00
4~__ -z'lr_ ~~~_ 11~_ _~_ _~-'_
1 3 111 1
68 1571 231 115 8 89
12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
75 20
3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * * Thru *
Right * * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * * Thru *
Right * * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right * * * EB Right * *
SB Right * * * WB Right * *
. Green 30.0A 15.0A 41.0A Green 20.0A 30 . OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0
Cycle Length: 159 secs Phase cpmbination order: #1 #2 #3 #5 #6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 690 3539 0.668 0.195 40.0 D 23.1 C
T 2706 5588 0.695 0.484 21.2 C
R 1334 1583 0.146 0.843 1.5 A
WB L 178 1770 0.404 0.101 44.1 E 28.8 D
T 2179 5588 0.835 0.390 30.5 D
R 1215 1583 0.135 0.767 3.1 A
NB L 245 1770 0.494 0.138 42.2 E 27.9 D
T 258 1863 0.031 0.138 38.3 D
R 1205 1583 0.061 0.761 3.1 A
SB L 712 3539 0.876 0.201 48.2 E 30.7 D
T 375 1863 0.021 0.201 32.9 D
R 1275 1583 0.305 0.805 2.6 A
Intersection Delay = 26.6 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.758
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-.
137
-
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 06-14-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Streets: (E-W) Red Bug Lake Road
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
(N-S) Oviedo Marketplace
File Name: OM0805.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
9:22 ,'E"- R L ~j- RJ )JJ,_ _l"l.._ l~:L L T bR2
_.L 1-0.]- ..iY.1J_ J1__ ~l-_ ~t _ J.. -
No. Lanes 2 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 1
Volumes 477 1570 107 340 1585 375 86 62 237 502 54 619
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 20 80 87 120
Lost Time 3.00 3 . 00- 3. 00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left * *
Thru * Thru '* *
Right * Right * *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right *
SB Right * * WB Right *
Green 2 8 . OA 43.0A Green 25.0A 15.0A .
Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0
Cycle Length: 130 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LCS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 790 3539 0.655 0.223 31.1 D 32.2 D
T 1934 5588 0.940 0.346 33.7 D
R 913 1583 0.101 0.577 8.0 B
WB L 395 1770 0.907 0.223 48.9 E 33.6 D
T 1934 5588 0.949 0.346 34.7 D
R 913 1583 0.340 0.577 9.4 B
NB L 193 1474 0.472 0..131 35.2 D 39.8 D
T 244 1863 0.267 0.131 33.0 D
.R 207 1583 .0.758 0.131 45.2 E
SB L 1013 3539 0.537 0.362 20.7 C 10.9 B
T 673 1863 0.085 0.362 J.7.7 C
R 1547 1583 0.340 0.977 0.1 A
Intersection Delay = 29.3 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.863
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
I c.f ()
-
HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 08-17-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
(N-S) GreeneWay west
File Name: OM0905.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
Streets: (E-W) Red Bug Lake Road
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
=======================================================================
--------------------~--------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left NB Left
Thru * Thru
Right * Right
Peds Peds
WB Left SB Left *
Thru * Thru
Right Right
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right *
SB Right WB Right
Green 90.0A Green . 20.0A
. Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0
Cycle Length: 120 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS.
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB T 4284 5588 0.500 0.767 3.5 A 2.8 A
R 1583 1583 0.372 1.000. 0.1 A
WB T 4284 5588 0.477 0.767 3.4 A 3.4 A
SB L 324 1770 0.724 0.183 35.1 D 35.1 D
Intersection Delay = 4.5 sec/veh Intersection LOS = A
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.543
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.....
.
,~,
HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 08-17-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
Streets: (E-W) Red Bug Lake Road
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
(N-S) GreeneWay east
File Name: OM1005.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
=======================================================================
. Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L 7i'Z. R L T R L T R
Z!.o1-:. fIiu= 3a2-
No. Lanes 1 3 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Volumes 348 1622 1811 402
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
---------------------.--------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * * Thru
Right Right
Peds Peds
WB Left SB Left
Thru * Thru
Right Right
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 30.0A 70.0A Green 15.0A
Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0
Cycle Length: 129 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5
7
8
.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 425 1770 0.861 0.240 41.6 E 8.5 B
T 4592 5588 0.409 0.822 2.0 A
WB T 3119 5588 0.672 0.558 13.4 B 13.4 B
NB L 466 3539 0.935 0.132 54.8 E 54.8 E
Intersection Delay = 14.9 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.758
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
\ '1 "2-
.-
HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 06-14-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
.
Streets: (E-W) Red Bug Lake Road
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
(N-S) SR426
File'Name: OM1105.HC9
11-24-98 pm
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
3~.z._ ~~_ R L T R ~~-- T R L T R
..L~.L YYJ_ -~'-~ l?Ct_ ~33-. _ ~~'- - -l.t19_
No. Lanes 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1
Volumes 584 1106 406 254 1006 398 217 527 390 328 464 491
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 80 130 125 200
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right * * EB Right * *
SB Right * * WB Right * *
. Green 24.0A 40.0A Green 27.0A 20.0A
Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0
Cycle Length: 131 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 702 3539 0.901 0.198 43.7 E 43.4 E
T 1194 3725 1.023 0.321 54.5 E
R 1197 1583 0.287 0.756 3.3 A
WB L 351 1770 0.760 0.198 38.4 D 31.6 D
T 1194 3725 0.931 0.321 37.2 D
R 1197 1583 0.236 0.756 3.1 A
NB L 392 1770 0.582 0.221 31.1 D 34.3 D
T 626 3725 0.932 0.168 49.8 E
R 1124 1583 0.248 0.710 4.3 A
SB L 392 1770 0.881 0.221 45.9 E 32.3 D
T 626 3725 0.818 0.168 39.8 D
R 1124 1583 0.272 0.710 4.4 A
Intersection Delay = . 36.5 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.945
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
1'Ij,
HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 08-17-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
(N-S) Lockwood Blvd.
File Name: OM1205.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
Streets: (E-W) Mitchell Hammock Rd
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
~~-- T R L T R l ~,t- - T R L T h
---- ~- ---- ----
No. Lanes 1 > 1 1 1 2 < 0 1 2 1 1 1 1
Volumes 612 92 689 54 63 18 620 460 57 115 330 402
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 200 0 15 180
Lost Time. 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thrli * Thru *
Right * * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right * * EB Right * *
SB Right WB Right
Green 25.0A 8.0A Green. 40 . OA 20.0A
Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 .
Cycle Length: 112 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C . Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ....---- -----
EB L 427 1770 0.860 0.241 37.5 D 22.3 C
LT 433 1796 0.864 0.241 37.7 D
R 1541 1583 0.334 0.973 0.1 A
WB L 158 1770 0.361 0.089 31.6 D 31.2 D
TR 322 3601 0.277 0.089 30.9 .D
NB L 648 1770 1.008 0.366 52.1 E 40.7 E
T 732 3725 0.694 0.196 29.0 D
R 876 1583 0.050 0.554 7.4 B
SB L 648 1770 0.187 0.366 15.6 C 40.4 E
T 366 1863 0.948 0.196 53.3. E
R 311 1583 0.753 0.196 34.1 D
Intersection Delay = 33.2 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.891
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
IV,!
-
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 08-17-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
.
Streets: (E-W) Dike Road
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
(N-S) Tuskawilla Road
File Name: OM1305.HC9
11-24-98 pm
=======================================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L ~1~_ R
s:_ ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ____ 2:=tL_ ---- -y~-
No. Lanes 1 1 < 0 0 > 1 <0 1 2 < 0 1 2 1
Volumes 441 1 233 1 1 2 200 1278 2 3 1206 397
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 50
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left * *
Thru * Thru * *
Right * Right * *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right * WB Right
Green 15.0A Green 8.0A 18.0A
. Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0
Cycle Length: 55 secs Phase combination order: #1' #5 #6
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 541 1749 0.858 0.309 20.7 C 17.2 C
TR 490 1584 0.502 0.309 10.7 B
WB LTR 429 1388 0.009 0.309 8.5 B 8.5 B
NB L 425 1770 0.496 0.582 6.7 B 5.7 B
TR 2167 3725 0.652 0.582 5.5 B
SB L 136 373 0.022 0.364 7.3 B 21.3 C
.-. T 1355 3725 0.983 0.364 26.7 D
R 1151 1583 0.317 0.~27 1.8 A
Intersection Delay = 14.3 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c (x) = o . ,8 8 7
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
I 'i~
-
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 08-17-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
(N-S) Tuskawilla Road
File Name: OM1405.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
Streets: (E-W) Lake Drive
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
=======================================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T l~J_ L T R IJ~l_ l J 1-:" R L T, . R
!--_ J_
No. Lanes 1 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 2 1
Volumes 303 593 484 1146 1226 192
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 120 50 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
---------------------~-------------------------------------------------
Phase Combination 1
EB Left *
Thru
Right
Peds
WB Left
Thru
Right
Peds
NB Right.
SB Right
Green
Yellow/AR
Cycle Length:
*
Signal Operations
23456
NB Left * *
Thru * *
Right
Peds
SB Left
Thru *
Right *
Peds
EB Right * *
WB Right
Green 23.0A 40.0A
Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0
Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6
7
8
17.0A
5.0
94 secs
.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 358 1770 0.892 0.202 39.9 D 14.4 B
R 3167 3167 0.178 1.000 0.0 A
NB L 1794 3539 0.292 0.734 6.3 B 4.2 A
T 2734 3725 0.463 0.734 3.3 A
SB T 1664 3725 0.815 0.447 16.9 C 16.1 C
R 707 1583 0.286 0.447 10.7 B
Intersection Delay = 10.7 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c (x) = 0.766
---------------------------------"--------------------------------------
.
('-{C:,
-
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 08-17-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
(N-S) Tuskawilla Road
File Name: OM1505.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
Streets: (E-W) Winter Springs Blvd
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
=======================================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R ~-- T R L SJ_- R L T R
---- S-'-_ r.,-- 2~-- ----
No. Lanes 1 1 < 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 < 0
Volumes 25 26 85 243 62 168 118 717 364 196 629 37
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 40 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
--
---------------------.--------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left * *
Thru * Thru * *
Right * Right * *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WE Right
. Green 22.0A 27.0A Green. 12.0A 49.0A
Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0
Cycle Length: 129 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6
------------,-----------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C. Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 316 1770 0.082 0.178 28.6 D 27.4 D
TR 370 1648 0.313 0.225 27.1 D
WE L 316 1770 0.811 0.178 42.9 E 35.8 D
T 419 1863 0.155 0.225 26.0 D
R 356 1583 0.497 0.225 29.1 D
NB L 143 361 0.869 0.395 50.3 E 22.8 C
T 1473 3725 0.538 0.395 19.7 C
R 626 1583 0.545 0.395 20.2 C
SB L 271 1770 0.760 0.527 23.4 C 14.3 B
TR 1947 3694 . 0.378 0.527 11.7 B
Intersection Delay = 22.5 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.781
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
1L/-7
HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 08-17-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
Streets: (E-W) Chapman Road
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
(N-S) SR434
File Name: OM1605.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T k-\_ L T R L T R L T ~
~~ ---- ---- ____ -S""J.1_ ---- ---- ~~- 1___
No. Lanes 2 1 2 1 1 < 0 2 3 < 0 1 3 1
Volumes 335 69 558 27 41 34 446 1557 32 42 1069 216
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
---------------------~-------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left * *
Thru * Thru * *
Right * Right * *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 10.0A 32.0A Green 20.0A 23.0A .
Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0
Cycle Length: 105 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 1146 3539 0.318 0.324 17.3 C. 19.2 C
T 603 1863 0.121 0.324 16.1 C
R 1026 3167 0.647 0.324 20.6 C
WB L 202 1770 0.138 0.114 27.1 D 28.2 D
TR 198 1735 0.398 0.114 28.6 D
NB L 1287 3539 0.375 0.476 12.7 B 14.1 B
-'- TR 2653 5571 0.694 0.476 14.5 B
SB L 71 '298 0.620 0.238 33.3 D 32.5 D
T 1330 5588 0.930 0.238 33.8 D
R 377 1583 0.602 0.238 24.9 C
Intersection Delay = 21.0 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.692
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
lye
-
HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 08-17-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
(N-S) SR434
File Name: OM1705.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
Streets: (E-W) Alafaya Woods Blvd
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T ~- L T R Cf~__ ~k_ R
---- ---- ---- ---- _ _ _ _ .5ik~_ ----
No. Lanes 1 1 < 0 0 > 1 1 1 3 < 0 1 3 < 0
Volumes 3 1 8 343 2 182 5 1312 428 277 1343 5
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols O. 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
.-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left * *
Thru * Thru * *
Right * Right * *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 35.0A Green. 24.0A 67.0A
. Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0
Cycle Length: 140 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- - - -.- - -----
EB L 62 233 0.049 0.264 24.8 C 24.7 C
TR 427 1614 0.021 0.264 24.6 C
WB LT 447 1692 0.812 0.264 38.7 D 35.1 D
R 418 1583 0.459 0.264 28.4 D
NB L 112 227 0.045 0.493 11.9 B. 19.5 C
TR 2653 5382 0.760 0.493 19.5 C
SB L 369 1770 0.791 0.693 35.0 D 10.5 B
TR 3870 5585 0.403 0.693 6.0 B
Intersection Delay = 17.7 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.806
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
If7
HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 08-17-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
Streets: (E-W) Mitchell Hammock Rd
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
(N-S) SR434
File Name: OM1805.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
J.~~_ "2~':t_ ---- ::L ':L ---- ----
No. Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 < 0 2 3 < 0 1 2 0
Volumes 174 1211 612 210 959 137 582 788 244 200 593
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 180 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
---------------------"--------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * * SB Left * *
Thru * Thru *
~ight * Right
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right * *
SB Right WB Right
Green 12.0A 43.0A Green . 26.0A 30 . OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 .
Cycle Length: 129 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6 -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay IOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 236 1770 0.775 0.473 31.0 D 39.9 D
T 1299 3725 1.030 0.349 54.2 E
R 1350 1583 0.337 0.853 1.3 A
WB L 236 1770 0.936 0.473 54.1 E 39.9 D
TR 1275 3656 0.950 0.349 37.3 D
NB L 741 3539 0.852 0.209 38.3 D 36.9 D
.:.. 1337
TR 5390 0.894 0.248 36.1 D
SB L 428 1770 0.493 0.481 15.9 C 26.8 D
T 924 3725 0.709 0.248 30.4 D
Intersection Delay = 37.1 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.948
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
I .)t:.:>
-
HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 08-17-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
.
Streets: (E-W) SR426 .
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with
project
(N-S) SR434
File Name: OM1905.HC9
11-24-98 pm
-
=======================================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L J. R L /f-l_ R L T R L T R
-~- '1e)
__oiL ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
No. Lanes 1 1 < 0 1 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0
Volumes 134 677 50 60 400 20 43 601 7 170 503 108
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left * *
Thru * Thru * *
Right * Right * *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 12.0A 48.0A Green 1:2.0A 51.0A
. Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0
Cycle Length: 142 secs . Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C . Approach: "'b
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 162 1770 0.870 0.092 66.1 F * * 2.e
TR 649 1843 1.180 0.352 * * 1'1 J
WB L 162 1770 0.389 0.092 40.1 E 28.9 D
TR 651 1849 0.679 0.352 27.3 D
NB LTR 443 1186 1.547 0.373 * * * * 0
SB LTR 705 1431 1.165 0.493 * * * * 2..0
.:..... Intersection Delay * ( sec/veh) Intersection LOS *
= =
(g/C) * (V /c) is greater than one. Calculation of D1 is infeasible.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
1(0"2- X o. 'Cl-Z c /2-t. z.g / 12..c. :: , 'S' . ~ 0).
"'-{If ').. 0_ 87 ~ St.S I ~ 'I S""t.b' :: .z,s.. ~.
70S;- C)g] ':::.- C, t ") 20 1"/3 - 3. ~ "6
)C.
.
IS-' '
HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 08-19-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
Streets: (E-W) SR434
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
(N-S) GreeneWay east
File Name: OM2005.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
===========================~===========================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
~Jj- 2c..1. - ~-
No. Lanes 1 1 0 0 2 1 2 0 1 0 0 0
Volumes 45 816 778 75 418 92
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
, -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru
Right Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left SB Left
Thru * Thru
Right * Right
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right * WB Right *
Green 70.0A Green 12.0A
Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 .
Cycle Length: 92 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lane Group:
Mvrnts Cap
Intersection Performance Summary
Adj Sat v/c g/C
Flow Ratio Ratio Delay
LOS
Approach:
Delay LOS
EB L 294 376 0.160 0.783 1.6 A 3.0 A
T 1458 1863 0.589 0.783 3.1 A
WB T 2915 3725 0.295 0.783 1.8 A 1.7 A
R 1583 1583 0.050 1.000 0.0 A
NB L 539 3539 0.841 0.152 32.5 D 30.9 D
R 241 1583 0.403 0.152 23.4 C
Intersection Delay = 8.9 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.630
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
I f'l-
-
HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 08-19-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
.
Streets: (E-W) SR434
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
(N-S) GreeneWay west
File Name: OM2105.HC9
11-24-98 pm
=======================================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L 2h_ -lg- L T R L T R L T R
~-
No. Lanes 0 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Volumes 841 233 40 1156 120 64
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
--------------------_._---------------~---------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left NB Left
Thru * Thru
Right * Right
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru
Right Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right *
SB Right * WB Right
Green 70.0A Green. 12.0A
. Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0
Cycle Length: 92 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5
Lane Group:
. Mvrnts Cap
Intersection Performance Summary
Adj Sat v/c g/C
Flow Ratio Ratio Delay
LOS
Approach:
. Delay LOS
EB T 1458 1863 0.607 0.783 3.2 A 2.5 A
R 1583 1583 0.155 1.000 0.0 A
WB L 108 138 0.389 0.783 3.2 A 2.2 A
T 2915 3725 0.438 0.783 2.2 A
SB L 269 1770 0.468 0.152 24.0 C 15.6 C
R 1583 1583 0.042 1.000 0.0 A
Intersection Delay = 3.3 sec/veh Intersection LOS = A
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.584
.
I~~
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 08-19-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Angl.in Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
Streets: (E-W) SR434
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
(N-S) Tuskawilla Road
File Name: OM2205.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
=======================================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L _Cl_ :f.Q _ L ~~- R ~-- -=--" -~ L T R
----
No. Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 < 0 1 > 1 1 1 1 1
Volumes 42 1211 782 65 925 18 606 60 41 40 75 30
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 120 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
---------------------~-------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right * * EB Right * *
SB Right * * WB Right
Green 10.0A 39.0A Green 25.0A 15.0A .
Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0
Cycle Length: 108 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay L'JS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 249 1770 0.177 0.509 11.1 B 20.7 C
T 14~4 3725 0.947 0.380 30.8 D
R 1334 1583 0.523 0.843 1.9 A
WB L 249 1770 0.273 0.509 13.8 B 19.8 C
TR 1410 3715 0.740 0.380 20.1 C
NB L 442 1770 0.793 0.250 31.1 D 29.1 D
LT 447 1789 0.783 0.250 30.4 D
R 1246 1583 0.035 0.787 1.6 A
SB L 279 1770 0.151 0.157 25.4 D 21.2 C
T 293 1863 0.269 0.157 26.0 D
R 1055 1583 0.030 0.667 4.0 A
Intersection Delay = 22.0 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.718
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
(.s- a.f
-
HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 08-19-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
.
Streets: (E-W) SR434
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
(N-S) CR419
File Name: OM2305.HC9
11-24-98 pm
=======================================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L ':\k_ R L &i_ R L T R S~__ T R
3.J.. -
No. Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1
Volumes 56 1360 890 666 807 62
LaneW (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 360 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * * NB Left
Thru * * Thru
Right Right
Peds Peds
WB Left SB Left *
Thru * Thru
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right * * WB Right
Green 10.0A 38.0A Green 52.0A
. Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0
Cycle Length: 114 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay
LOS
Approach:
Delay LOS
EB L 236 1770 0.250 0.474 13.2 B 19.9 C
T 1764 3725 0.852 0.474 20.1 C
WB T 1307 3725 0.753 0.351 22.8 C 22.3 C
R 555 1583 0.580 0.351 20.6 C
SB L 838 1770 1.013 0.474 46.4 E 43.1 E
R 1541 1583 0.042 0.974 0.0 A
Intersection Delay = 26.3 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.932
~
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
/~~
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 08-19-1999
GlattingJackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
Streets: (E-W) SR426
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other .
Comment: Year 2005 with project
(N-S) Tuskawilla Road
File Name: OM2405.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
=======================================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L ~- R L _-1CJ_ R L T R L T R
\J.l \. _ ---- ---- ---- 2.0'2.....
No. Lanes 2 2 < 0 1 2 1 1 1 < 0 2 1 1
Volumes 549 1255 1 1 886 .855 1 1 2 634 1 490
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 300 0 100
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * * Thru *
Right * * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right * * WB Right *
Green 22 . OA 46. OA Green 25.0A
Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0
Cycle Length: 107 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2
6
7
8
#5
.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay L~S
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 761 3539 0.782 0.215 29.3 D 12.6 B
TR 2576 3725 0.539 0.692 5.4 B
WB L 102 227 0.010 0.449 10.6 B 10.8 B
T 1671 3725 0.586 0.449 14.7 B
R 1154 1583 0.506 0.729 4.3 A
NB L 446 1768 0.002 0.252 19.3 C 19.3 C
TR 423 1676 0.007 0.252 19.4 C
SB L 839 3326 0.819 0.252 28.9 D 18.1 C
T 470 1863 0.002 0.252 19.3 C
R 1539 1583 0.267 0.972 0.1 A
Intersection Delay = 13.3 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.696
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
ISTo
-
HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 08-19-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
.
Streets: (E-W) SR426
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
(N-S) GreeneWay west
File Name: OM2505.HC9
11-24-98 pm
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L ;[0- R L T R L T R
3~_ Z4_
No. Lanes 0 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Volumes 1578 80 1620 120
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time' 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
--------------------~--------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left NB Left
Thru * Thru
Right Right
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * * Thru
Right Right
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 15.0A 60.0A Green 12.0A
. Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0
Cycle Length: 101 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB T 2287 3725 0.763 0.614 10.3 B 10.3 B
WB L 280 1770 0.300 0.158 24.4 C 3.7 A
T 2987 3725 0.599 0.802 2.7 A
SB L 245 1770 0.514 0.139 27.6 D 27.6 D
Intersection Delay = 7.5 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.644
.
/ ::-,
HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 08-19-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
===================~===================================================
(N-S) GreeneWay east
File Name: OM2605.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
Streets: (E-W) SR426
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
=======================================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L 5k_ R L Ro- R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Volumes 276 ~444 1237 661
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * * Thru
Right Right
Peds Peds
WB Left SB Left
Thru * Thru
Right Right
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 18.0A 50.0A Green 20.0A
Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 YellowjAR 5.0
Cycle Length: 102 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5
7
8
.
------------------~----------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 330 1770 0.883 0.186 42.4 E 10.4 B
T 2702 3725 0.591 0.725 4.6 A
WB T 1899 3725 0.720 0.510 13.5 B 13.5 B
NB L 763 3539 0.939 0.216 39.5 D 39.5 D
Intersection Delay = 16.7 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.805
------------------------------------------------------------------"-----
.
I ~-t
-
HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 08-19-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
.
Streets: (E-W) SR426
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: . Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
(N-S) Dean Road
File Name: OM2705.HC9
11-24-98 pm
=======================================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L -i()- R L T /?Jk L T R
____ ~.r_ ~~- ---- ---- ---- ----
No. Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 > 1 1 0 > 1 1
Volumes 11 943 673 377 707 5 576 5 394 1 4 16
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 150 0 100 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
:-
---------------------~--------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * * SB Left *
Thru * * Thru *
Right * * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right * EB Right *
SB Right * * WB Right *
Green 28.0A 46.0A Green 52.0A
. Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0
Cycle Length: 140 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 112 328 0.107 0.343 20.3 C 21.3 C
T 1277 3725 0.817 0.343 30.1 D
R 1187 1583 0.463 0.750 4.5 A
WB L 420 1770 0.945 o . 5-71 50.4 E 23.9 C
T 2129 3725 0.367 0;571 1.0.6 B
R 1549 1583 0.003 0.979 0.0 A
NB LT 667 1728 0.917 0.386 39.0 D 28.7 D
R 972 1583 0.319 0.614 8.4 B
SB LT 636 1649 0.008 0.386 17.1 C 3.9 A
R 1549 1583 0.011 0.979 0.0 A
Intersection Delay = 23.8 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.899
---------------------------------------------------~-------------------
.
/srj
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 08-19-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
Streets: (E-W) Chapman Road
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment": Year 2005 with project
(N-S) SR426
File Name: OM2805.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L _=__ LJ1_ L T R L U.h _~__
---- ---- ---- ---- z-~::L l~l_
No. Lanes {) > 1 < 0 0 > 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 < 0
Volumes 4 7 5 217 1 498 4 978 454 543 676 7
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
"RTOR Vols 0 120 100 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left * *
Thru * Thru * *
Right * Right * *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 28.0A Green 30.0A 32.0A
Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0
Cycle Length: 104 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6
.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB LTR 416 1442 0.038 0.288 17.2 C 17.2 C
WB LT 471 1632 0.486 0.288 20.4 C 29.3 D
R 457 1583 0.872 0.288 34.3 D
NB L 113 346 0.035 0.327 15.4 C 26.2 D
T 1218 3725 0.887 0.327 27.3 D
R 518 1583 0.721 0.327 23.3 C
0:. SB L 599 1770 0.955 0.654 37.8 D 19.2 C
TR 2432 3720 0.310 0.654 5.1 B
Intersection Delay = 24.0 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost" Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.919
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
/60
..
HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 08-19-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
.
Streets: (E-W) Oviedo Marketplace
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
(N-S) SR426
File Name: OM2905.HC9
11-24-98 pm
=======================================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
l~ T 'Il1- L T R 'tbl- ~ R L .1Is R 8
_ _ _ _ z..J__
No. Lanes 2 0 1 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 2 1
Volumes 158 460 401 1497 1110 238
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 120 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru Thru * *
Right * Right
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left
Thru Thru *
Right Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right * *
SB Right * WB Right
Green 10.0A Green 28.0A 80.0A
. Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0
Cycle Length: 132 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6
Lane Group:
Mvrnts Cap
Intersection Performance Summary
Adj Sat v/c g/C
Flow Ratio Ratio Delay
LOS
Approach:
Delay LOS
EB L 322 3539 0.532 0.091 38.4 D 12.4 B
R 1583 1583 0.226 1.000 0.0 A
NB L 778 3539 0.559 0.220 30.3 D 7.5 B
T 3217 3725 0.514 0.864 1.5 A
SB T 2314 3725 0.530 0.621 9.3 B 8.3 B
R 1163 1583 0.216 0.735 3.6 A
Intersection Delay = 8.5 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.537
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
/(,/
-
HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 08-19-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
Streets: (E-W) Winter Springs Blvd
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
(N-S) SR426
File Name: OM3005.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
=======================================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T .& L T R L ks R L ~ R
---- ---- ~~- ____ __'.f..
No. Lanes 1 1 1 0 > 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1
Volumes 219 10 481 58 13 15 708 947 7 2 580 i94
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 120 0 0 70
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru * *
Right * Right * *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right * EB Right * *
SB Right * WB Right * *
Green 20.0A Green 28 . OA 56.0A
Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 .
Cycle Length: 118 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 247 1325 0.935 0.186 59.2 E 22.5 C
T 347 1863 0.032 0.186 25.4 D
R 1583 1583 0.240 1.000 0.0 A
WB LT 320 1718 0.234 0.186 26.5 D 21.8 C
R 1583" 1583 0.010 1.000 0.0 A
NB L 870 3539 0.882 0.246 35.2 D 18.4 C
""- T 1421 1863 0.702 0.763 5.7 B
R 1583 1583 0.004 1.000 0.0 A
SB L 112 227 0.018 0.492 9.9 B 13.8 B
T 916 1863 0.667 0.492 16.0 C
R 1113 1583 0.117 0.703 3.7 A
Intersection Delay = 18.2 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.778
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Ib~
..
HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 08-19-1999
=========:::::~~~=~:~~=~~=~:~~~:~=~~:~~=:~~::=~~~:~~~:~=~~~~==========
.
Streets: (E-W) SR426
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
(N-S) Lake Jessup
File Name: OM3105.HC9
11-24-98 pm
=======================================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
71-- /1.L- 1:1__ L T R ~ T R L T _k.
( 'tL - ---- -~-- ---- ---- ---- ----
No. Lanes 1 1 < 0 1 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 1
Volumes 224 855 65 11 545 52 79 97 45 76 63 108
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
---------------------~--------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right * * WB Right
Green 9.0A 42.0A Green . 19.0A
. Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0
Cycle Length: 84 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 300 1770 0.787 0.679 21.3 C 33.0 D
TR 965 1843 1.003 0.524 35.8 D
WB L 300 1770 0.040 0.679 10.0 B 10.5 B
TR 963 1838 0.653 0.524 10.5 B
NB LTR 312 1250 0.742 0.250 25.0 C 25.0 C
SB LT 168 674 0.866 0.250 43.2 E 24.3 C
"-' R 1526 1583 0.075 0.964 0.0 A
Intersection Delay = 25.0 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c (x) = 0.964
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
1'- ~
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 08-19-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
(N-S) Lockwood Blvd
File Name: OM3205.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
Streets: (E-W) CR419
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
=======================================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
~-- T R ~:J. _ T R L T IL_ L T _~e_
---- ---- ---- ----
No. Lanes 1 2 1 2 2 < 0 1 1 1 1 2 < 0
Volumes 41 413 365 581 279 44 209 324 724 45 152 44
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 40 0 200 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * * Thru *
Right * * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right * EB Right * *
SB Right WB Right
Green 23.0A 23.0A Green 22.0A 13.0A
Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0
Cycle Length: 100 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6
.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS . Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 207 828 0.208 0.250 19.2 C 13.9 B
T 931 3725 0.491 0.250 21.1 C
R 1108 1583 0.309 0.700 3.8 A
WB L 849 3539 0.742 0.240 25.1 D 19.0 C
TR 1898 3650 0.188 0.520 8.3 B
NB L 425 1770 0.518 0.240 22.2 C 20.8 C
T 447 1863 0.763 0.240 28.1 D
R 760 1583 0.725 0.480 15.8 C
SB L 266 1770 0.177 0.150 24.0 C 24.9 C
. TR 540 3601 . 0.400 0.150 25.1 D
Intersection Delay = 18.8 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.618
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
I'i
.
.
.
Page 165
"K" AND "D" FACTORS
Traffic Impact Study
Oviedo Marketplace
August 20, 1999
: I
r,
1997 Annual Average Daily Traffic Report
county. 77
SEMINOLE
Site
lite Type Description
1002
:aQD aa.. .aaa..........a.aaaDaaaaaaaaaa.aa.........aaaaaa==
1004
l009
l010
0018
0020
0021
0028
OUO
0050
0063
0064
0073
0074
0079
'0099
0102
0103
0104
0106
0108
0110,
0113
0114
0116
ON SR-46, 0.79 MI. W or eR-15 (RV)
ON sa-46, 0.4 MI. E or C-425 (AIRPORT BLVD.)(UV)
ON SR-15/600, 0.101 MI. N or OEN. HUTCHINSON (UVL)
ON SR-419, 0.14 MI. SE OF SR-15/600 (UV)
ON SR-15/600, 0.1 MI. NE OF ORANOE CO.(UV)
.....
~
~
ON SR-426, 0.177 MI.NE OF MITCHELL HAMMOCK (RVL)
ON SR-434,0.931 MI. N or SR-426 (UVL)
ON SR-46, 0.88 MI. E or CR-425 (SANFROD AV) (UV)
ON SR-15/600, 0.34 MI. N or CR-15 (av)
ON 8R-15/600, 0.347 MI. 8 OF 27TH 8T. (UVL)
ON SR-434, 0.176 MI W or C-427 (UVL)
ON 8R-15/600, 0.74 MI. NH or SR-46 TO THB WEST(UV)
ON SR-46, 0.33 MI. B or CR-431 (RV)
ON SR-46, 0.180 MI. E OF LAKE CO (RVL)
ON SR-436, 0.046 MI. W OF SR-15/600 (UVL)
ON sa-434, 0.17 MI.N or SR-436 (UV)
T
8R-600, 1.4 MI. 8 or SR-46
ON 8R-46, 0.08 MI. E OF CR-15 (UC)
ON 8R-15/600, 0.058 HI. S or LK MARY BLVD (UVL)
ON SR-436, 0.201 MI. B OF CR-427 (LONGWOOD AV(UVL)
ON SR-434, 0.69 MI. NH or SR-426 (RV)
ON SR-426, 0.147 MI. B OF TUSKAWtLtA RD.) (UVL)
ON SR-436, 0.6 HI. E or SR-434 (UV)
ON sa-436, 0.2 HI. W or 8R-434 (UV)
ON SR-434, 0.14 HI.8 OF sa-436 (UV)
Direction 1
c:=aaaaaaaaa
E
12500
w
Direction 2
12600
aaaacaa:===a
w
S
o
S
w
o
o
o
o
o
9200
18000
31000
11000
S
8400
Two-Way
C::lI:U:IIaaaa
25000C
18000C
35000e
o
15500e
, I
"K'.
Fctr
D:lDcaD
8.881'
8.881'
8.881'
8 . 881'
8.881'
8.88!'
8.88!'
8.881'
8.881'
8.881'
8.881'
8.881'
8.881'
8.881'
8.881'
8.881'
9.32A
8.881'
8.881'
8.881'
8.881'
8.881'
8.881'
8.88!'
8.881'
nn"
Fctr
==a::::n:z
55.161'
55.161'
55.161'
55.161'
55.161'
55.16!'
55.161'
55.161'
55.16!'
55.161'
55.161'
55.161'
55.161'
55.161'
55.161'
55.161'
55.31A
55.161'
55.161'
55.161'
55.161'
55.161'
55.161'
55.161'
55.161'
slte Type .
AADT Flags .
NK/D" Flags I
NT" 1'.'
1n,nch4 ,
. portable * T . Telemetered
e a Computed * E a Manual Est * I' . First Year Est * 8 a Second Year Est * T · Third Year Est * X · Unknown
A a Actual * I' . Volume I'ctr Catg * D . Dist/Functional Class * S · State-wide Default
A . Actual * I' . Axle Fctr Catg * D . Dist/Functional Class ~ S a State-wide Default * X
PARA 1 ~
E
8800
N
17000
N
29500
E
10500
N
8200
N
9000
N
17500
E
23500
E
6900
E
35000
N
21163
E
12500
N
21500
E
28500
E
12500
27500
B
E
26000
N
21500
S
10500
S
19000
w
22500
w
6700
32000
w
s
20358
w
12000
s
20000
w
29000
w
13000
~I
27500
w
26500
S'
21500
60500e
21500e
16600e
o
16000C
19500e
36500C
46000e
o
13000e
o
12500e
13600e
67000e
o
37000e
U521e
24500e
U500e
57500e
o
13000e
25500e
55000e
52500e
43000e
g
"T"
Fctr
aD.aa
8.801"
8.801"
1.621'
5.401"
1.621"
3.971"
1.821"
7.0lF
1.621"
1.621'
.4.091"
1.621'
8.801"
8.801'
2.081'
4.091"
1.62A
8.80A
1.621'
2.081'
5.401'
3.971"
2.081"
2'.081'
1.981'
. Cross-Reference03-Apr-1998
~ 77 r.aanT.TYT .
County. 77
Site
ite Type
133
135
152
153
168
17.
,197
,:U5
1263
1264
1266
)267
)268 ........
~
)270 ~
)271
J273
~273
0277
0278
0279
0280
0281
0282
0283
0284
Site Type
MDT Flagll
NK/D" Flagll
"T" Flags
n'\-J.nr-1QQA
.
: I
1997 Annual Average
SEMINOLE
Description
a...
.
...aaaaaaaaaaaaa............aaaaDDaaaaaaaaamaa.aaa
ON SR-.36. 0..9 MI. E OF 1-4 RAMPS (UV)
ON SR-426, 0.041 MI. W or SR-.34 (RVL)
ON SR-IS/600. 0.029 MI. N OF SR-.36(UVL)
ON SR-15/600, 0.69 MI. SW OF SR-434 (UV)
ON SR-46, 0.1 MI. B OF SR-426 (RV)
ON SR-46. 0.1 MI. W or SR-426 (RV)
T
SR-434. 1.6 MI E or I-4.SEMINOLE CO
ON SR-15/600. 0.23 MI. SW or SR-.6 TO THE WEST(UV)
ON SR-.34, 0.092 MI. W OF GRANT ST.)
ON SR-.3..0.1 MI. B or SR-15/600 (UV)
ON SR-.OO. 0.5 MI. HE OF SR-.6 (RV)
ON SR-.OO. 0.6 MI. SW OF SR-43. (UV)
ON SR-.OO. 1.87 MI. SW or SR-.6 (RV)
ON SR-400. 1.7 MI. HE or SR-.34 (UC)
ON SR-436, 1.69 MI. SE OF SR-IS/600 (UV)
ON SR-15/600. 1.47 MI. HE OF SR-436 (UV)
ON SR-15/600. 0.52 MI. HE OF SR-434 (UV)
ON SR-43., 2.93 MI. HE 01' SR-436 (UV)
ON Sa-4l4, 2.3 MI. SB OF Sa-419 (UV)
ON SR-415. 0.1 MI. N OF SR-46 (RC)
ON SR-434. 0.4 MI. N 01' SR-41. (aC)
ON SR-426. 0.281 MI. HE or CR .2~(DEAN RD) (UeLP)
ON SR-426. 0.034 MI. W or CR-425 (DBAR RD) (RVL)
ON SR-134. 1.55 MI. HE or SR-426 (UeL)
SR-434. 0.15 MI. W or TUSKAWILLA RD~' (UCLP)
I.
Daily Traffic
Direction 1
I::u::a==cu:a::a=c::a:
E
30000 W
E
6500 W
N
33000E S
24000 S
N
E
23071
E
19000
E
17500
B
36100E
B
58400E
B
41500E
E
52000B
E
32500
N
23500
N
20000
N
6000
N
24000
E
8400
10000
E
N
12500
E
13000
.. Portable
C .. computed
A .. Actual *
. A .. Actual *
In.nQ.44
* T .. Telemetered
* E .. Manual Bst * I' .. First Yaar Est * S .. Second
F .. Volume Fctr catg * D .. Dist/Functional Class *
I' .. Axle Fctr Catg * D" Dist/Punctional Class *.S
P..n.. 2
Report
o
o
o
o
o
Direction 2
aa....amaa==
31000
6700
31500E
25000
W
21129
Two-Way
===I:u:rca
&lOOOC
13200e
64500P'
49000C
o
. 5300C
, I
II Kit
Fctr
I:uu:u:a::l
8.881'
8.881'
8.881'
8.881'
8.881'
8.881'
7.99A
8.881'
"D"
Fctr
aaac:aa
55.161'
55.16F
55.161'
55.161'
55.161'
55.161'
55.85A
8.881' 55.161'
55.161'
8.881' 55.161'
9.94D 54.57D
9.94D
9.94D 54.57D
54.57D
9.94D
8.881'
8.881'
8.881'
.8.881'
8.881'
8.881'
8.881'
8.881'
8.881'
8.881"
8.881'
54.57D
55.161'
55.161'
55.161'
55.161'
55.161'
55.161'
55.161'
55.16F
55.16P'
55.161'
55.161'
Year Est * T a ~hird Year Est * X .. Unknown
S .. State-wide Default
.. State-wide Default * X .. Cross-Reference
" .,.,
w
18500
W
17000
W
40300E
W
59800E
W
41800E
W
53700E
w
31500
S
25000
s
21500
S
6300
S
24000
W
8100
W
10500
S
12000
W
13000
o
810DC
44200C
o
23000e
37500C
34500C
76400E
118200E
83300E
105700E
64000C
U500C
41500e
o
51500C
o
15500C
12300C
48000e
16500C
20500C
24500e
26000C
, j
I
.
tiT"
Fctr
GQaaa
2.081'
3.971'
1.621'
1.621'
7.011'
7.01P'
1.80A
1.621'
4.091'
4.091'
11. 59D
11. 59D
11.59D
11.59D
2.08P'
1.621'
1.621'
4.091'
5.401'
4.88A
1.98A
3.97A
3.97P'
1. 82A
5.45A
r.J.J.TYI'.'I'1C'I'
- --...---- --- ---_..----
1997 Annual Average Daily Traffic Report
County I '1'1 SEMINOLE
Site nKu "D" "T"
lite Type Description Direction 1 Direction 2 Two-Way Fctr Fctr Fctr
11:11. . gaa. a..........aa.aa...aaaaaaaa..m...aa...aa.a.aaaaaaa aaaaaaamal:Sa az;;cnaaagaaaa aaaa:ClIiID =CU:Ul;lr:II SlalDa. CII:u:saD
1299 T SR-46.0.39 MI W OF ST JOHNS RIVER BRG.SEMINOLE CO E 5163 W 5014 10177e 9.891. 53.011. 7.011.
LOOO ON SR-434.0.08 MI.SW OF SR-U9 (Ue) E 7900 W 7800 15700e 8.881' 55.161' 4.091.
LOOl ON SR-419.0.08 MI.NW OF SR-434 (UV) 0 0 11000e 8.881' 55.161' 5.4OF
lO02 ON SR-434.0.312 MI.E OF SR-U9 (UCLP) E 13500 W 13500 27000e 8.88F 55.161' 5.401.
5002 ON SR-4H,0.03 MI. N OF SR-426 (RVL) N 6100 S 5800 11900e 8.881' 55.161' 1.82F
5005 ON SR-434. 0.021 MI. N OF SR-426 (RVL) N 5800 S 7700 13500e 8.881' 55.16F 5.401'
5038 ON SR-46. 0.52 MI. E OF CR-U5 (SANFORD AV) (UVI 0 0 19500e 8.881' 55.161' 7.011'
5040 ON SR-46. 0.03 MI. W OF CR-U5 (SANFORD AV.) (UV) 0 0 19500e 8.881' 55.161' 7.011'
SOU ON SR-46. 0.05 MI. E OF SR-15/600 (UV) 0 0 16500e 8.881' 55.161' '1.011'
5050 ON SR-46. 0.47 MI. W 01' SR-15/600 (UV) 0 0 16000e 8.88F 55.16F 8.801'
5051 ON SR-15/600. 0.0'18 MI. N OF PARK DR. (UVL) N 14000 S 14500 28500e 8.88F 55.161' 1.62F
5052 ON SR-15/600. 0.18 MI. N 01' SR-46 TO THE WEST(UV) 0 0 13000e 8.88F 55.161' l.62F
5057 ~ ON SR-15/600. 0.56 MI. NE 01' SR-U TO THE EAST(UV) 0 0 30500e 8.881' 55.161' 1.62F
5066 ON SR-15/600. 0.025 MI. 8 01' HIAWATHA AVE (UVL) N 18500 S 16500 35000C 8.881' 55.161' 1.621'
5071 ON 8R-436. 0.06 MI. W OF C-U7 (LONGWOOD AV.)(UVL) E 29500 W 30000 59500C 8.88F 55.161' 2.081'
5018 ON SR-436. 0.25MI.E OF SR-15/600 (UV) E 32000 W 33500 65500C 8.881' 55.161' 2.081'
5082 ON SR-434, 1.0 MI. 8W OF SR-U9 (UV) E 12000 W 11500 23500e B.BBF 55.161' 4.091'
I I
Site Type I . portable
AADT Flag. I C . Computed
"K/D" Flags I A a Aotual *
"T" Fl. A · Actual *
n~_knr-1 n,nq,..
* T a Telemetered
* E a Manual Est * I'
I' . Volume Fotr eatg
I' . Axle Fotr catg *
a I'irst Year Est * S a Second
* D . Dist/Funotional Class *
D . Dist/Functio::~AC~* 8
Year Est * T . Third Year Est * X a Unknown
8 a state-wide Default
a State-wide Default * X a Cross-Reference
" .,.,
r.AATl'l'..
.
.,...
.
.
ORANGE COUNTY
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DEPARTM:ENT
Definition of Terms
Avera~e Daily Traffic (ADn
The total volume passing a point or segment of a road facility, in both directions,
during a 24-hour period. It is commonly obtained during a given time period, in whole
days greater than one day and less than one year, divided by the number of days in that
time period.
Peak Hour Factor (K Factor)
The ratio of peak hour traffic to average daily traffic. The K Factor allows the
conversion from a peak hour volume to a daily volume. Table 1 presents an example
calculation of the K Factor.
Table 1 - CalculatinO' K Factor
.,.,
Measured Peak: Daily Peak Hour Peak: to Daily
Day Hour Volume Volume Ratio.
1/18 4-5 PM 20,000 1,600 0.080
1/19 5-6 PM 25,000 1,900 0.076
1/20 4-5 PM 22,000 2,000 0.091
Average 22,333 0.082
C'PeakDailv Volume) / (ADT) = 25000/22333 = 1.119
Estimated K Factor = 0.082 X 1.119 = 0.092 .
Directional Distribution Factor (D Factor)
This factor accounts for the directional distribution of traffic. It is used to convert
peak: hour traffic to directional peak hour. traffic. Table 2 illustrates how the D Factor is
calculated:
T bl 2 Cal 1. D F
a e - cu atmg actor
Measured Peak Peak Hour . Predominate Opposite D
Day Hour Volume Directional Peak Direction Factor
Volume Peak VoltIme
1/18 4-5 PM 1. 600 960 640 0.600
1/19 5-6 PM 1.900 1,026 874 0.540
1/20 4-5 PM 2,000 1.130 870 0.565
Sum 5,500 3,116 2,384 1. 703
A vera~e 1,833 1,039 795 0:568
Estimated D Factor = 0.568
Directional PM Peak .
The traffic volume for the peak hour in the predominant direction of flow, 10
vehicles per hour.
PM Dffi. PEAK = (ADT) (K Factor) CD Factor)
loq
ORANGE COUNTY TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
ANNUAL TRAFFIC COUNTS
'"
.,J
t)
Sta II Jur Limit ADT K PmPlt D Di.. PltDir OllpD StartDate Ln Slld
33 RD STREET
Ion co E. OF JOHN YOUNG P ARKW A Y ( WIDTCOMB A V) 6,840 0,0819 560 0.5171 EB 290 211 lul15,1991 40
1024 CO W. OF RIO GRANDE A VENUE ,1997 40
4TH STREET ,
203 CO E. OF ORANGE A VENUE 5,004 0,0804 402 0.6406 EB 258 145 AIIg 5, 1997 35
A.D. MIMS ROAD
15 Co W. OF APOPKA-VINELAND ROAD 6,191 0.0895 608 0.6351 WB 386 221 Il1n 3, 1991 45
ALAFA Y A TRAIL
(i'sD CO S. OF SEMINOLE COUNTY LINE 36,906 0,0842 3,101 0.6516 NB 2,043 1,064 Oct 21, 1991 45
(251 CO S. OF UNIVERSITY BLVD, 50,731 0.0821 4,166 0.5581 NB 2,321 1,838 Oel21, 1991 45
4iii CO N. OF COLONIAL DRIVE 46,127 0.0188 3,635 0.5536 SB 2,013 1,623 Oel21,1991 45
264 CO S. OF COLONIAL DRIVE 31,658 0,0859 2,121 0.5325 NB 1,449 1,212 Oel21, 1991 45
265 CO N. OF EASTERN EXPRESW A Y 29,218 0.0861 2,531 0.5288 NB 1,341 1,196 Oel21, 1997 45
1005 CO S. Oft EASTERN EXPRESSWAY , 1991
261 CO S. OP LAKE UNDERHn..L ROAD 1,021 0.1188 834 0.7021 NB 586 248 Oel 21, 1997 "5
ALL AMERICAN BOULEVARD
418 CO E. OF EDGEWATER DRIVE ,1997
433 CO W. OF FOREST CITY ROAD ,1997
ALOMA AVENUE
5078 CO E. OF LAKEMONT AVENUE ' 1997 35
(r.i 1 ~ CO W. OF SEMORAN BLVD SR-436 46,606 0.0730 3,400 0.5794 EB 1,970 1,430 Oel7, 1997
(il3 CO E. OF SEMORAN BOULEV AnD 38,655 0.0756 2,921 0,5469 EB 1,598 1,324 OCl7, 1997 45
234 CO E. OF FORSYTH ROAD . 1997 45
313 CO W. OF GOLDENROD ROAD .1991 45
314.1 CO E. OF GOLDENROD ROAD ,1997
.
.or16
.
.
I
.
.
ORANGE COUNTY, FLOIUDA
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
1996 ANNUAL TRAFFIC COUNT REPORT
STAll JRDCT ROAD_NAME LOCATION ADT_95 ADT _96 PM_K PM_D DlR PM]K PK_DlR WEEK_96 OP _DlR SPEED
\023 County BRD STREET EAST OF JOHN YOUNG PARKWAY 9114 6,966 0.0165 0.5168 EB 533 301 01123.{)1f25 225 40
1024 CountY 33RD STREET WEST OF RJO.GRANDE A VENUE 1,654 6.398 0,0829 0.1244 EB 530 384 01f23.{)112S 146 40
203 County 4TH STREET EAST OF ORANGE AVENUE 4448 5,154 0.0111 0.6112 ED 400 245 06/04 '{)6106 156 35
256 County ALAfAYA TRAJL SOlITH OF SEMINOLE COUNTY LINE 30,311 33.131 0.0693 0.5595 NB 2295 1284 02l21.{)2129 1,011 45
H9.5 State ALAfAYA TRAIL SOlTfH OF SEMINOLE COUNTY LINE 31,500 35 000 3.5
251 County ALAfAYA TRAIL SOlTfH OF UNIVERSITY BLVD 38 922 45242 0.0186 0.5259 NB 3 SS5 1,810 02127.{)2129 1.686 45
264 County ALAFAYA TIWL SOlTfll OF COLONIAL DRIVE 21,999 29,291 0.0858 0.5237 NO 2,513 1,316 02127-02129 1,197 45
488 County ALAFAYA TRAIL NORTII OF COLONIAL DRIVE SR-50 38,009 44,549 0.0791 0.5101 SO 3549 2023 02l27.{)2129 1.S26 45
488.5 State ALAFAYA TRAJL NORTH OF COLONIAL DRIVE 43,.518 31.000 4.5
265 County ALAfAYATRAlL NORTH OF EASTERN EXPRESW A Y 21,542 25,5.53 0.0821 0.5043 NO 2.114 1,066 02127-02129 1.048 45
100.5 County ALAFAYA TRAJL SOlTfll OF EASTERN EXPRESSWAY 20,317 24,3.51 0.0844 0.547.5 SO 2,055 1125 03/07-03109 930
267 County ALAfAYATRAlL SOlTfH OF LAKE UNDERIIILL ROAD 8,135 10407 0.0904 0.5193 SO 941 488 02127-02129 452 45
418 County ALL AMERICAN OLVD . EAST EDGEWATER DRIVE 24,439 0.0933 0.6046 WO 2280 1378 04123-04/25 902
433 County ALL AMERICAN BLVD WEST OF FOREST CITY ROAD 18,271 18,833 0.0848 0.5865 EO 1.S98 937 04123-04125 661
.565.5 Stete ALOMA AVENUE EAST OF INTERSTATE 4 31,000 41,500 35
.5018.5 State ALOMA AVENUE ~TOF~MONTROAD 49,270 38,000 40
.5078 County ALOMA AVENUE EAST OF ~MONT AVENUE 51,404 0.0761 0.6138 EB 3.912 2401 04/09-04/11 1.511
231 County ALOMA AVENUE WEST OF SEMORAN BLVD SR-436 42,198 42,42.5 0.0713 0.6169 EO 3,024 1,866 04/09-04/11 1,159
414.5 State ALOMA AVENUE WEST OF SEMORAN BOULEVARD 52,.500 53,.500 40
2)) County ALOMA A VENUE EAST OF SEMORAN OOULEV ARD 34,186 33,749 0.0790 0.5596 EO 2,665 1,491 04102-04104 1,174 45
234 County ALOMA AVENUE EAST OF FORSYTH ROAD 3.5,384 34,510 0.0811 0.6030 EO 2.803 1.690 04102-04/04 I 113 45
113 County ALOMA A VENUE WEST OF GOLDENROD ROAD 30,334 22,567 0.0159 0.5.593 EO 1.713 958 04/02-04104 755 45
314.5 State ALOMA AVENUE WEST OF GOLDENROD ROAD 32,.500 24,.500 45
IH:U State ALOMA A VENUE EAST OF GOLDENROD ROAD 26,000 29,500 45
114 "1 County ALOMA AVENUE EAST OF GOLDENROD ROAD 21,368 0.0721 0,.5710 EO 1,973 1,126 04/09-04/11 846
1041 County AMERICANA BOULEVARD WEST OF JOlIN YOUNG PARKWAY 18,107 20,939 0.0900 0.5819 EO I 885 1,097 01116-07/18 188 35
181 County AMERICANA BOULEVARD WEST OF TEXAS AVENUE 20,565 21,.558 0.0865 0.5090 EO 1866 950 0111 6-07/18 916 35
183 County AMERICANA BOULEVARD WEST OF ORANGE OLOSSOM TRAIL 11,575 1,761 0.1031 0.5665 EO 800 453 07123.{)712S 347 35
382 County ANDERSON STREET WEST Of GONWAY ROAD 3,902 6,249 0,1110 0.7046 EB 731 515 512\.5123 216 30
.554.5 State ANDERSON STREET EAST OF MILLS AVENUE 21,.500 24,500 35
.5115.5 State ANDERSON STREET EAST OF MAGNOLIA A VENUE 32.000 34,500 25
1008 County APOPKA OOULEV ARD SOlITH OF ORANGE BLOSSOM TRAlL 3,629 3876 0.0913 0.SS93 NO 354 198 09/24-09/26 156 30
l3 County APOPKA BOULEVARD WEST OF OVERLAND ROAD 6,374 .5,901 0.0585 0.5593 EO 345 193 09/24-09/26 152 4S
16 County APOPKA VINELAND ROAD NORTH OF SILVER STAR ROAD 14,467 11,128 0.0841 0,6324 NO 986 624 08120-08122 363 SO
122 County APOPKA VINELAND ROAD SOlITH OF OLD WINTER GARDEN ROAD 11,169 11,189 0.0894 0.6497 NO I,OS4 68S 7130-8/1 369
.....
-..J
,..
A1ICnIBk
t,
~~,
, I
I .
Sla II Jur Limll ADT K PmPlt D Dlr PltDlI' OIIIID SlnrtDate Ln Slid
435.1 CO W. OF 11-92 ORLANDO AVENUE 36,681 0.0143 2,725 0.5193 EB 1,415' 1,310 Oct 1, 1991 35
,
5072 CO E. OF 11-92 ORLANDO AVENUE 32,053 0.3981 12,161 0.9024 EB 11,515 1,245 Oct 1, 1991 35
396 CO E. OF ORANGE AVENUE 40,549 0.0110 2,879 0.5856 EB 1,686 1,193 Sep 23, 1991 30
FERN CREEK AVENUE
369 CO N. OF RAEFORD ROAD ' 1991 35
FIEQUETTE ROAD
139 CO S. OF WINl1!R GARDEN-VlNELAND ROAD 1,429 0.0183 582 0,8455 Nfl 492 90 JUIl 17, 1997 45
FOREST CITY ROAD
42 CO N. OF CALUMET DIUVE 36,521 0,0910 3,322 0.5789 Nfl 1,923 I ",399 Sep 30, 1997
44 CO N. OF EDGEW A TER DIUVE 22,980 0.1061 2,439 0.5560 NB 1,356 1,083 Aug 19, 1997
FORSYTH ROAD
235 CO S. OF ALOMA AVENUE 11,423 0.0874 999 0,6731 Nfl 613 326 Oct 1, 1997
237 CO S. OF UNIVERSITY BOULEVARD ' 1991 35
244 CO N. OF SR-50 EAST COLONIAL DRIVE ' 1991 35
FO RT CHRISTMAS ROAD
308 CO S. OF LAKE PICKElT ROAD 1,231 0.1011 124 0.5153 SB 72 53 Sep 16, 1997
309 CO N. OF COLONIAL DRIVE 1,223 0.1040 121 0.6213 SB 19 48 Sep 16, 1997
- GATLIN AVENUE
~ 211 CO W. OF CONWAY ROAD ' 1997
i 212 CO E. OF CONWAY ROAD 16,146 0.0770 1,289 0.6920 EB 892 391 Aug 26, 1991 40
l
323 CO E. OF ORANGE AVENUE 10,168 0.1147 1,166 0.6194 ED 192 314 Jun 10, 1991 30
GENERAL REESE AVENUE
394 CO N. OF CORRINE DRIVE ' 1991 3S
GLENRlDGE WAY I I
395 ,CO W. OF GHORGE AVENUE 16,131 0.0948 1.529 0.6351 WB 912 551 Oct 1, 1997 30
GOLDENROD ROAD
i{239 CO N. OF UNIVERSITY BOULEVARD 24,154 0.0845 2.093 0.5127 Nfl 1,199 894 OCl14, 1997 45
~ ~40 CO S. OF UNIVERSITY BLVD 32,697 ' 0.0823 2,692 0.5049 SB 1,359 1,333 Oct 14, 1997 45
... . ~~ CO N. OF COLONIAL DRIVE 31,692 0.0800 2,534 0.5100 fiB 1,293 1,242 OCl14, 1997 45
241 CO S. OF COLONIAL DIUVE 30,823 0.0817 2,519 0,5485 Nfl 1,382 1,137 .oct 14, 1997 45
.
.f16
.
I .
.
~.
.
.
ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
1996 ANNUAL TRAFFIC COUNT REPORT
STAN JRDCT ROAD_NAME LOCATION ADT _95 ADT_96 PM_K PM_D D1R PM_PK PK_D1R WEEK_96 OP_D1R SPEED
1028 CounlV IUAWASSEE ROAD NORm OF RALEIGII STREET 33 192 33815 O,OBSI 0.6007 ND 2877 1.728 11105.11107 I 149 45
1029 County iliA W ASSEE ROAD SOlITH OF RALEIGH STREET 29,711 32.172 0.0896 0.6010 NB 2,884 1,733 8/6-8/8 I ISI
149 County HlAWASSEE ROAD NORTH OF CONROY ROAD 23,028 26.113 0.0903 0.6781 NO 2,359 1.S99 7130-811 159
196 County HOFFNER AVENUE EAST OF ORANGE AVENUE 17,897 8,127 0.0737 0.5136 ED 599 344 06/11-06113 2SS
208 Counly 1I0FFNER AVENUE WEST OF CONWAY ROAD 17,278 18,834 0.0816 0.6349 ED 1,5J8 976 05114.05116 561
209 CounlY HOFFNER A VENUE EAST OF CONWAY ROAD 22157 24,051 0.0746 0,5916 ED 1795 1,062 05114.05116 733
522.5 Stale 1I0r-flIER AVENUE WEST OF SEMOItAN BOULE V Alto 19,000 21.000 45
326.5 Slale HOFFNER AVENUE WEST OF GOLDENROD ROAD 17500 18,000 J5
288 CounlY HOFFNER AVENUE WEST OF GOLDENROD ROAD 18,189 16,519 0,0783 0.66J7 EB 1294 859 05114-05116 435
185 County HOLDEN AVENUE EAST OF RIO GRANDE A VENUE 12,020 12,075 0.0815 0.51J6 .ED 984 50S 07116-07118 478 35
187 County HOLDEN AVENUE WEST OF JASSAMINE LANE IJ,J45 12 211 0.0834 0.5J14 ED 1019 541 07116-07/18 477 J5
1027 Counly HONOUR ROAD WEST OF RIO GRANDE A VENUE 7,804 8279 0,1058 0.6125 ED 876 531 07/16-07118 340 35
/ 50) CounlV IIORA TlO AVENUE EAST OF MAITLAND BOULEVARD J 5 824 J5,096 0.0851 0.625J ED 2,987 1867 04116-04118 1,119 45
m County INDIAN lULL ROAD EAST OF POWERS DRIVE 468J 4,270 0.0911 0.5137 ED J89 223 05/07-05/09 166 45
1048 County INTERNATIONAL DRIVE EAST OF KIRKMAN DRIVE 29,150 J5.008 0,0798 0.5002 we 2,795 1,398 06118-06f.20 1397
1047 County INTERNATIONAL DRIVE NORTH OF CARRIER DRIVE 22,896 29,604 0.0706 0.5259 SB 2,090 1.099 06/18.06f.20 991
1046 County INTERNATIONAL DRIVE SOlITH OF CARRIER DRIVE 23 088 33,208 0.0474 0.5026 NB 1573 790 06118-06f.20 782.
l46 County INTERNATIONAL DRIVE SOl1fH OF WESTWOOD DL VD 20,100 22,372 0.0719 0,6275 NB 1,609 1.010 06/18-06120 599
158 County INTERNATIONAL DRIVE NORTH OF SR528 29,703 31.003 o.ono 0.5263 NO 2262 1.191 06/1 8-06f.20 1072
l47 County INTERNATIONAL DRIVE NORTH OF SR535 19929 27,182 0,0980 0.6491 NB 2,664 1,729 06/18-06f.20 935
1069 County INTERNATIONAL DRIVE NORTII OF SR417 (GREENW A Yl 11,788 0.0952 0.6101 NO 1,123 685 06/18-06120 438
lOBO.5 Slale INTERSTATE 4 NORTII OF MAITLAND BOULEV A1tD 121000 125,500 SO
l075.5 Slale INTERSTATE 4 NORTH OF CONItOY ROAD 106,000 105,500 50
l074.5 Slale INTERSTATE 4 NORTII OF LEE ROAD 156,500 159,500 50
3069.5 Slale INTERSTATE 4 NORTH OF FAlRDANKS AVENUE 147,500 153000 SO
3064.5 Slale INTERSTATE 4 NORTH OF PAR A VENUE I 56 000 160.000 55
3061.S Slate INTERSTATE 4 NORTH OF PRINCETON STREET I 59 500 169.000 55
3056.5 Slalo INTERSTATE 4 SOlITH OF PRINCETON STREET 158,500 168,500 55
305 I.S Stale INTERSTATE 4 NORTH'Of COLONIAl.. DRIVE 139,500 164,500 0
3040 Slate INTERSTATE 4 NORTH OF ROBINSON STREET 137,000 I 52 000
3034.5 Slale lNTERST ATE 4 NORm OF EASTIWEST EXPRESSWAY 154,500 166,000 0
302H State INTERSTATE 4 SOlITH OF EASTIWEST EXPRESSWAY 149,500 169,500 0
3018,5 Slale INTERSTATE 4 NORTH OF ORANGE BLOSSOM TRAIL 145,000 I 52,000 0
lO12.5 Slale INTERSTATE 4 WEST OF ORANGE BLOSSOM TRAIL. 137,500 141,500 0
3007.5 Slale INTERSTATE 4 EAST OF FLORIDA TURNPIKE 124.500 114,500
....
~
A1ICnIBk
Page 10
: I
I .
Sta #I Jur Llnlit ADT K PmPk D Dir PI(Dir OIIIlD StnrlDnlc Ln SI)(I
511] CO S. OF ANDERSON STREET , 11,939 0.1001 1,202 0,6118 SB 808 ]95 Aug 12, 1991 30
311 CO N. OF CURRY FORD ROAD 12,21] 0.0914 1,122 0.5068 Nfl 569 553 Aug 12, 1991 30
318 CO S. OF CURRY FORD ROAD ' 1991 35
383 CO S. OF LAKE MARGARET DRIVE 2,221 0.1023 228 0.1099 SB 162 66 Ang 12, 1997 35
CURRY FORD ROAD
373 CO E. OF BUMBY AVENUE 21,184 0.0801 1,698 0.6341 EB 1,011 620 Aug 26, 1997 35
]14 CO E. OF CRYSTAL LAKE DRIVE 35,043 0.0804 2,816 0.6546 EB 1,843 913 Aug 26, 1991
491 CO E. OF CONWAY ROAD 31,803 0.0163 2,886 0.6182 EB 1,184 1,102 Aug 26, 1991 ]5
221 CO W. OF SEMORAN BLVD SR-436 33,255 0.0114 2,314 0.5405 EB 1,283 1,091 . Sep 23, 1991 40
220 CO E. OF SEMORAN BOULEVARD ' 1991 45
284 CO W. OF ClUCKASAWTRAIL ' 1997
286 CO E. OF ClUCKASA W TRAIL ' 1997
416 CO W. OF DEAN ROAD ROAD 11,546 0.0969 1,100 0.6441 EB 1,095 605 . Ocl 28, 1997 45
DAETWYLER DRIVE
]52 CO S. OF RAMP ART DRIVE ' 1997
DEAN ROAD
l "'!SO CO S. OF SEMINOLE COUNTY LINE 14,890 0,0914 1,451 0.5975 NB 861 584 Dee 16, 1991
~ml CO S. OF UNIVERSITY BLVD 29,299 0.0981 2,815 0,6203 S8 1,183 1,092 Nov 4, 1991
cH ~S8. CO N. OF COLONIAL DRIVE SR-50 22.623 0.0891 2,015 0.5294 NB 1,061 948 Nov 4, 1991
- 212 CO N. OF LAKE UNDERHILL ROAD 11,356 0.0926 1,601 0.5501 NB 884 123 Nov 4, 1997
..J
~ 216 CO S. OF LAKE UNDERHILL ROAD 20,983 0.0910 1.910 0.5014 SB 958 952 Dee 16, 1991
411 CO N. OF YOUNG PINE ROAD 16,312 0.0951 1,562 0.6363 NO 994 568 Nov 4, 1997
DILLARD STREET
454 CO N. OF COLONIAL DRIVE SR-50 16,649 0.0199 1,332 0.5298 Nfl 705 626 Jnn 10, 1997 35
DIXIE BELL DRIVE ,
384 CO N. OF MlClUGAN STREET 9,359 0.0910 852 0.5HO Nfl 438 414 Aug 26, 1997 40
385 CO S. OF PERSHING AVENUE ' 1997 40
DR PHILLIPS BOULEVARD
150 CO S. OF CONROY WINDERMERE ROAD 8,875 0.0861 164 0.5466 S8 418 346 Jul 22, 1991
10]9 CO N. OF WALLACE ROAD ' 1991
154 CO N. OF SAND LAKE ROAD ' 1997
.
P..2&
.
I .
.
.
It
Sla 1# Jur Llmll ADT K PIIIPlt D Oi.. PltDir OIIIID SlartOale Ln Slid
ROSE AVENUE I I
36 CO N. OF EDGEWATERDRlVE 12,082 0.1038 1,254 0.6325 NB 193 461 Sep 9, 1997 35
31 CO S. OF EDGEW A TER DRIVE 5,920 0,0934 . 553 0.6291 SB 348 205 Scp 9, 1997 35
38 CO N. OF CLARCONA OCOEE ROAD 4,150 0.0949 394 0.5828 NB 230 164 Sep 16, 1991
ROUND LAKE ROAD
6 CO N. OF V ALLEY ROAD ( N OF KELLY PARK RD ) 2,628 0.1003 264 0.5228 NB 138 126 Mar 4, 1991 2 55
8 CO N. OF KING AVENUE 2,534 0.1160 294 0..5233 NB 154 140 Mar 11, 1991 30
nOUNDLAKE ROAD
1 CO S. OF KELLY PARK ROAD 2,169 I 0.1102 305 0.S598 NB 111 , 134 Mar 11, 1991 55
RQUSE ROAD
T ~ CO S. OF SEMINOLE COUNTY LINE 2,315 0.0999 231 0.65.56 SB 1.52 80 Nav 21, 1997 45
CO S. OF UNIVERSITY BLVD. ' 1997 45
(26~ CO N. OF COLONIAL'DR. SR-50 12,018 0.1036 1,251 0.5221 NB 653 598 Oel21, 1991 45
41'7 CO N. OF LAKE UNDERHILL ROAD 1,136 0.1089 842 0.6233 NB 525 317 Oel21,1997 45
SADLER ROAD
324 CO E. OF SLOEWOOD AVENUE 3,678 0.0852 313 0.5024 WB 157 156 Mar 4, 1997 45
2 CO W. OF ORANGE BLOSSOM TRAIL 3,994 0.0957 382 0.5366 WB 20.5 117 Mar 4, 1997 50
" 3 CO E. OF ORANGE BLOSSOM TRA~ 1,936 0.0984 190 0..5665 WB 108 83 Mar 4, 1997 45
oJ
l\ SAND LAIm ROAD .
155 CO E. OF APOPKA-VINELAND ROAD ' 1997
153 CO W. OF 11lRKEY LAKE ROAD 41,732 0.0800 3,338 0.5949 WB 1,986 1,3.52 Dee 2,1997
453 CO W. OF INTERNATIONAL DRIVE 50,302 0.0741 3,725 0.5228 WB 1,948 1,778 Dee 2, 1997 40
112 CO W. OF JOHN YOUNG PARKWAY 51,422 0.0796 4,092 0.5506 EB 2,253 1,839 lul29, 1991 45
1049 CO E. OF INTERNATIONAL DRIVE ' 1997
113 CO E. OF JOHN YOUNG PARKWAY , f 50,891 0.0139 3,161 0.5411 WB 2,038 1,724 lul29, 1991 45
541 CO W. OF CHANCELLOR DRIVE 48,181 0.0695 3,348 0.5214 WB 1,746 1,602 lul29, 1997 45
45~ CO W. OF ORANGE BLOSSOM TRAIL 47,148 0.0718 3,428 0.5215 EB 1,788 1,640 lul29, 1991 45
174 CO E. OF ORANGE BLOSSOM TRA~ 46,122 0.0698 3,260 . 0.5366 EB 1,749 1,511 lul29, 1991 45
508 CO W. OF ORANGE AVENUE 40,19!> 0.0790 3,225 0.5963 EB 1,923 1,302 Aug 12, 1991 45
403.1 CO E. OF ORANGE AVENUE ' 1991
SEIDEL ROAD
I'agc '21 or16
Sta II Jur Limit ADT K Pml'l( D Dlr PI(Dlr 011pD SlartDate Ln Sllll
144 CO E. OF AVALON ROAD . , , 923 0,0670 62 0.5084 WB 31 30 Jun 17. 1997 45
SEMORAN (SR436) BOULEVARD
295.1 CO B. OF ORANGE BLOSSOM TRAn... 22,628 0.0144 1,683 0.5356 WB 901 781 Apr 1. 199'1 45
26 CO B. OF ROGER WD...UAMS ROAD 3'1,185 0.0781 2,915 0.5118 WB 1.540 1.435 Apr I. 1997 45
S.l CO E. OF PIEDMONT WEKIV A ROAD 46.332 0,0181 3,646 0.5294 EB 1.930 1.116 Mar 25. 1997 45
,-H2) CO N. OF ALOMA AVENUE 56,998 0.0162 4.341 0,5220 NB 2.266 2.075 Oct 7, 1991 45
C1JO 1 CO N. OF UNIVERSITY BLVD . 1991
- <llD CO S. OF UNIVERSITY BLVD 54,713 0.0762 4,171 0.5605 NB 2,337 1,833 OCl7. 1991 45
228 CO N. OF HANGING MOSS ROAD 56.189 0.0114 4,347 0.5604 NB 2.436 1.911 OCl7, 1991 50
221 CO S. OF HANGING MOSS ROAD 49,491 0.0981 4,884 0.5354 NB 2.615 2.269 OCl1.1991 50
-le72S) CO N. OF SR-50 EAST COLONIAL DIUVE 50,020 0.0112 3.560 0.5038 NB 1.793 1.766 OCl1. 1997 45
226.1 CO N. OF OLD CHENEY HIGHWAY 55.424 0.0767 4.250 0.5553 NB 2,360 1.890 OCl1. 1997 45
224 CO S. OF SR-50 COLONIAL DRIVE 60.366 0.0783 4,129 0.5141 SB 2.715 2,014 Sep 23. 1997 45
223 CO N. OF EAST WEST EXPRESW A Y 61,822 0.0757 4,680 0.5651 SB 2.645 2.035 Sep 22. 1997 45
222 CO S. OF LAKE UNDElUULL ROAD 60.901 0.0123 4.404 0.5505 SB 2.424 1.980 Sep 23. 1997 45
219 CO S. OF CURRY FORD ROAD 57,351 0.0675 3.872 0.5015 SB 1.942 1.930 Aug 19. 1997
218 CO N. OF PERSHING AVENUE 55.418 0.0687 3,814 0.5243 NB 2.000 1,814 Dee 9, 1997
211 CO S. OF PERSHING AVENUE .1991 55
216 CO S. OF GATLIN AVENUE . 1991 45
2IS CO N. OF HOFFNER AVENUE 55,458. 0,0612 3.729 0.5881 NB 2.195 1.534 Aug 19,1991
,"' 214 CO S. OF HOFFNER AVENUE 57.901 0.0681 3.916 0.5991 NB 2,382 1.594 Aug 19. 1991
J
~ 213 CO N. OF SR-528 44,719 0.0721 3,251 0.5026 SB 1.631 1,620 Dee 9. 1991
SHEELER ROAD
31.1 CO E.OFAPOPKABOULEVARD 11.543 0.0907 1,041 0.5003 SB 524 523 Apr 22, 1997 45
31 CO E. OF CLARCONA ROAD . 1991 45
SILVER STAR ROAD I I
5120 CO E. OF OCOEE-APOPKA ROAD 12,093 0.0839 1,015 0.5625 WB 511 444 Jun 3, 1997
89.1 CO E. OF STARKE LAKE 12.605 0.0890 1.122 0.5162 EB 519 543 Jun 3. 1991 45
17 CO w. OF GOOD HOMES ROAD 17.458 0.0858 1,491 0.5111 WB 865 632 Jun 24. 1991
568 CO W. OF APOPKA VlNELAND ROAD 20,611 0.0895 1,849 0.5251 EB 911 818 Jun 24, 1997
18 CO W. OF IDA W AS SEE ROAD .1997
91 CO B. OF POWERS DRIVE .1997
.'
per:l6,
.
I .
..
I
.
.
ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
1996 ANNUAL TRAFFIC COUNT REPORT
STAM JROCT ROAD_NAME LOCATION ADT_95 ADT _96 PM_K PM_D DlR PM_PK PK_DIR WEEK_96 OP_DlR SPEED
HI.5 Slale SAND LAKE ROAD EAST OF FLORIDA TURNPIKE 47276 46 000 45
541 CounlY SAND LAKE ROAD WEST OF CIIANCELLOR DRIVE 48.056 0.0737 0,5084 EB 3.541 1,800 06/25 '{)6127 1741
452.5 Slale SAND LAKE ROAD WEST OF ORANGE BLOSSOM TRAIL 47,766 43.000 45
452 CounlY SAND LAKE ROAD WEST OF ORANGE BLOSSOM TRAIL 49,515 47,950 0.0746 0,5143 EB 3,578 1,840 06125.{)6127 1,738
114 CoUnlY SAND LAKE ROAD EAST OF ORANGE BLOSSOM TRAIL 42,151 47,865 0.0762 0.5655 EB 3647 2062 06125-06127 I 585
508.5 Slale SAND LAKE ROAD WEST OF OItANG!! A VENUI~ 40,003 3R,500 <IS
508 CounlY SAND LAKE ROAD WEST OF ORANGE A VENUE 43,485 40,560 0.0840 0.5876 EB 3408 2,003 06/11-06113 1,405
403 I County SAND LAKE ROAD EAST OF ORANGE AVENUE 40,868 40,988 0.0171 0.5563 EB 3160 1758 06l11.{)6113 1402
403.5 Slale SAND LAKE ROAD EAST OF ORANGE AVENUE 39,660 38,500 oiL
144 CounlY SEIDEL ROAD EAST OF AVALON ROAD 493 661 0.1020 0.5767 WB 67 39 09/1 0-09/12 29 45
295 I Counly SEMORAN SR436 BOULEVARD EAST OF ORANGE BLOSSOM TRAIL 35 586 20,139 0.0750 0.5279 WB 1,556 821 09n4-09126 735 45
295,5 Stale SEMORAN SR436 BOULEVARD EAST OF ORANGE BLOSSOM TRAIL 21,698 22,000 45
26 CounlY SEMORAN SR436 BOULEVARD EAST OF ROGER WILLIAMS ROAD 38028 34 853 0.0802 0.5236 WB 2.794 1,463 09124-09126 1331 45
5 I County SEMORAN SR436 BOULEVARD EAST OF PIEDMONT WEKIVA ROAD 50,391 49,182 0.0858 0.5132 EB 4218 2.165 09124-09126 2053 45
}NJ County SEMORAN SR436 BOULEVARD NORTH OF UNIVERSITY BLVD 59.887 0.0739 0.5146 NB 4.425 2,217 11I19-11121 2.148
229 County SEMORAN SR436 BOULEVARD SOlIfH OF UNIVERSITY BLVD 49,006 0.0617 0.5477 NB 3,320 1.818 04/09-04/11 1,502
228 County SEMORAN SR436 BOULEVARD NORTII OF HANGINO MOSS ROAD 51,210 0.0719 0.5529 NO 3,685 2,037 04/0N14/04 1.647 50
227 County SEMORAN SR436 OOULEVARD SOlIfll OF HANGINO MOSS ROAD 51,819 0.0714 0.5150 NO 31S1 1,932 04/02-04104 1,819 50
225 CountY SEMORAN (SR436 OOUI.EVARD NORTlI OF SR-50 EAST COLONIAL DRIVE 44,138 0.0699 0.5080 SO 3126 1,588 04102.{)4104 1538 45
226 I Counlv SEMORAN SR436 BOULEVARD NORTH OF OLD CHENEY IIIGlIWAY 51,680 0.0721 0.5266 NB 3,724 1,961 04/02.{)4/04 1,763 45
506.5 Slale SEMORAN SR436 BOULEVARD NORTH OF COLONIAL DRIVE 48,500 44,000 <IS
.192.5 Slale SI:MOllAN SR436) BOULEVARD SOlIfll OF COLONIAl. DRIVE 47,000 41,000 45
224 CounlY SEMORAN SR436) BOULEVARD SOlrrll OF SIl-50 COLONIAL DIlIVE 59 III 61,435 0,0764 0.5511 SO 4,695 2,618 04/09-04/11 .2.071
223 CounlY SEMORAN SR436 BOULEVAIlD HORTH OF EAST WEST EXPRESW A Y 63,619 65,286 0.0136 0.5499 SO 4804 2,642 04/09-04/11 2,162
5119,5 Stale SEMORAN SR436 BOULEVARD HORTH OF EAST/WEST EXPRESSWAY 52 000 59,000 45
5178.5 Stale SEMORAN SR436 I BOULEVARD SOlIfll OF EAST/WEST EXPRESSWAY 50,500 60,500 45
222 Coullty SEMORAN SR436 BOULEVARD SOlIfll OF LAKE UHDERIIILL ROAD 58,491 61,890 0.0691 0.5293 SB 4,276 2,263 04109-04/11 2012
395.5 Sllle SEMORAN SR436 BOULEVARD NORTlIOFCURRY FORD ROAD 49,000 56,000 50
516.5 Slale SEMORAN SR436 BOULEVARD SOlIfH OF'CURRY FORD ROAD 51,000 60,000
219 County SEMORAN SR436 DOUtEVARD SOlIfH OF CURRY FORD ROAD 52,000 51,298 0.0688 0.5157 HO 3,943 2,033 05/14-05/16 1,909
218 CounlY SEMORAN SR436 BOULEVARD NORTH OF PERSHING AVENUE 53,348 51,868 0.0696 0.5229 NB 4028 2106 05/14-05/16 1922
217 CounlY SEMORAN SR436 BOULEVARD SOUTH OF PERSHING AVENUE 48,118 55,133 0.0698 0,5157 NB 3,891 2,240 05/14-05/16 1,651
216 County SEMORAN SR436 BOULEVARD SOUTH OF OA TLlN AVENUE 50,392 59,145 0,0129 0.5907 NB 4309 2,545 05/14-05/16 1764
215 County SEMORAN SR436 BOULEVARD NORTH OF HOFFNER A VENUE 47,545 54,617 0.0709 0.5969 NB 3.873 2,312 05/14-05/1 6 1 561
1006.5 Slale SEMORAH SR436 BOULEVARD SmITH OF HOFFNER ROAD 44,800 48,800 55
,
~
A1ICnIBk
PaOli 19
I .
, 1
,11
..J
l\
Sta II . Jur Limit ADT K PmPlt D Dlr PltDir OIIIID StnrtDate Ln Spd
.
THOMPSON ROAD I
,
429 CO S. OF WELCH ROAD 4,275 0.0864 369 0.5278 NB 195 174 Mar 25, 1997 45
24 CO S. OF VOTAW ROAD 8,257 0.0892 737 0.6332 NB 467 270 Mar 25, 1997 35
TlLDEN ROAD
133 CO W. OF AVALON ROAD 1,514 0,0876 133 0.6945 WB 92 41 Jnn 17, 1997 45
TURKEY LAKE ROAD
151 CO S. OF CONROY WINDERMERE ROAD 14,851 0.0868 1,289 0.7424 NB 957 332 Jul 22, 1997
1038 CO N. OF WALLACE ROAD ' 1997
152 CO N. OF SAND LAKij ROAD ' 1997
1S7 CO S. OF SAND LAKE ROAD ' 1997
UNIVERSITY DOULEVARD'
(13V CO B. OF SEMORAN BOULEVARD 47,837 0.0828 3,959 0.6005 EO 2,377 1,581 OCl7,1997 45
238 CO W. OF GOLDENROD ROAD 52,013 0.0845 4,393 0,6041 EO 2,654 1,739 Oct 14, 1997 45
fl1I.J) CO W. OF HALL ROAD 44,609 0.0946 4,218 0.5983 EB 2,524 1,694 Noy 4, 1997 45
"389) CO W. OF DEAN ROAD 56,586 0.0913 5,167 0.SS04 EB 2,844 2,323 Noy 4, 1997 45
111/ CO B. OF DEAN ROAD ROAD 57,266 0.0872 4,994 0.S049 WB 2,521 1,473 Noy 4, 1991 4S
Hs) CO W. OF ALAFAYA TRAlL 44,740 0.0865 3,872 0.5815 WB 1,251 1,620 Oct 21, 1991 45
'-"
VALENCIA COLLEGE LANE
110 CO W. OF ECONLOCKHATCHEE TRAIL 10,219 0.0849 867 0.5859 EO 508 359 Noy 4, 1991 .
VANGUARD STREET
340 CO W. OF MANDAIUN DRIVE ' 1991
VILLA DRIVE
400 CO W. OF FOREST CITY ROAD ' 1991
VIRGINIA DRIVE I I
408 CO W. OF 11-91 10,519 0.0979 1,030 0.6105 EB 629 401 Oct 7, 1991 30
VOTAW ROAD
23 CO W. OF CHRISTINA AVENUE 8,762 0.0941 825 0.S721 WB 472 353 Mar 25, 1991 45
329 CO B. OF THOMPSON ROAD 1,918 0.0923 731 0.5289 WB 381 344 Mar 25, 1997 35
WALLACE ROAD .
339 CO E. OF DR PHILLIPS BL YO ~ I ,1991
.1
.,Of26
.
-
.
.
"'"
.
K AND D FACTORS - SR426 (LAKE JESSUP DRIVE - SR434)
Oviedo Marketplace
Count Total D Peak-to-Daily
Date EB we Peak-Hour Factor ACT Ratio
11-18-98 595 456 1051 0.5661 14,081 0.0746
11-19-98 562 517 1079 0.5209 13,691 0.0788
11-20-98 587 450 1037 0.5661 14,382 0.0721
Average 581 474 1.055 0.5507 14,051 0.0752
MOCF =
Average peak-to-daily ratio =
Estimated K100 = (0.0752/0.97) =
0.97
0.0752
0.0775
Source:
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
.,.
Irq
Conducted by: Accurate Traffic Counts, Inc.
Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 1
********************************************************************************
Data File Dll18001.PRN
Station 000000000001
Identification 000000691007 Interval
Start date Nov 18, 98 Start time
Stop date Nov 18, 98 stop time
City/Town OViedo County
Location SR-426, east of Lake Jessup Avenue
*******************************************************************************
.
15 minutes
00:00
24:00
Seminole
Nov 18
Westbound Volume for Lane 1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
End Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11
--------
15 3 8 1 4 4 23 69 192 165 157 103 148
30 6 3 11 7 9 29 111 137 205 113 104 157
45 7 4 7 8 9 64 119 111 193 140 98 121
00 8 5 5 6 14 . 49 196 135 188 88 123 145
--------
Hr Total 24 20 24 25 36 165 495 575 751 498 428 571
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
--------
15 136 131 129 109 122 106 108 73 44 45 39 .15
30 102 121 115 114 119 102 100 92 51 35 21 10
45 101 101 108 121 111 137 81 82 70 37 24 4
00 130 115 93 115 112 111 83 46 67 22 12 6
-------- .
Hr Total 469 468 445 459 464 @ 372 293 232 139 96 35
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
24 Hour Total ~
AM peak hour begins : 08:00 AM peak volume : 751 Peak hour factor : 0.92
PM peak hour begins : 12:30 PM peak volume : 483 Peak hour factor : 0.92
*******************************************************************************
Nov 18 Eastbound Volume for Lane 2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
End Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11
--------
15 13 10 3 2 4 13 16 98 80 103 96 90
30 9 4 1 4 4 12 21 88 88 98 82 106
45 8 4 5 8 5 12 43 76 87 84 89 95
00 11 5 8 6 3 18 84 71 94 97 109 94
--------
Hr Total 41 23 17 20 16 55 164 333 349 382 376 385
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 7 S"i 0
-------- ~S'f I
15 113 108 115 110 133 156 145 106 74 91 26 7 I~O 6' 1
30 102 141 102 99 130 152 138 65 73 53 23 16
45 118 144 107 121 132 138 90 79 80 35 19 11
00 103 110 94 124 149 149 119 65 67 31 11 6
--------
Hr Total 436 503 418 454 544 @ 492 315 294 210 79 40
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- .
24 Hour Total @P
AM peak hour begins : 11: 15 AM peak volume : 408 Peak hour factor : 0.90
PM peak hour begins : 16:45 PM peak volume : 595 Peak hour factor : 0.95
*******************************************************************************
/,?O
-
.
..,-
.
.
Conducted by: Accurate Traffic Counts, Inc.
Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 1
********************************************************************************
Data File Dll19001.PRN
Station 000000000001
Identification 000000691007 Interval
Start date Nov 19, 98 Start time
stop date Nov 19, 98 Stop time
City/Town OViedo County
Location SR-426, east of Lake Jessup Avenue
*******************************************************************************
Nov 19
Westbound Volume for Lane 1
15 minutes
00:00
24:00
Seminole
End Time
00
01
02
03
04
06
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11
05
15
30
45
00
10
6
3
4
3
6
6
2
- 2
2
3
5
2
4
9
3
23
34
51
53
217
121
115
153
73
111
110
191
5
8
10
16
Hr Total
23
12
18
39
161
606
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
23
<185
17
End Time
12
14
16
18
17
13
15
15
30
45
00
114
100
98
105
95
116
87
104
117
119
102
118
147
116
108
128
148
96
119
123
104
73
59
52
141
116
122
138
109
102
87
73
Hr Total 417
402
456
499
486 @ 371
288
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
235
162
36
07
08
09
10
175
216
164
128
143
110
103
118
107
102
116
97
99
78
113
122
683
474
422
412
19
20
21
22
56
68
62
49
19
25
17
15
42
44
48
28
15
8
6
7
76
24 Hour Total :(72971
AM peak hour begins:~ AM peak volume: 708 Peak hour factor : 0.82
PM peak hour begins: 17:00 PM peak volume: 517 Peak hour factor: 0.92
*******************************************************************************
Nov 19
Eastbound Volume for Lane 2
End Time
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
09
07
10
11
08
15 6 6 0 2 1 8 22 103 97 98 86 95
30 6 3 1 5 3 12 25 84 89 80 98 82
45 6 1 0 2 9 17 48 77 82 81 91 87 7"L 97
00 5 7 3 2 3 14 72 74 93 84 81 104 (, ~,...,
-------- - -
Hr Total 23 17 4 11 16 51 167 338 361 343 356 368 13 " ct 1
_______________________________________________________________________________ J
548 @V 479
-------------------------------------------------------
;~-~::~-;:~:~---------~
AM peak hour begins : 11:30 AM peak volume: 381 Peak hour factor : 0.92
PM peak hour begins : 17:00 PM peak volume: 562 Peak hour factor: 0.92
*******************************************************************************
End Time
12
13
14
15
16
18
17
15
30
45
00
103
87
67
108
104
96
118
93
91
132
158
114
109
107
129
122
140
147
129
132
142
153
133
134
141
132
102
104
96
101
82
81
Hr Total
365
411
495
467
360
181-
19
20
23
21
22
79
50
69
65
67
66
49
39
22
15
13
5
37
23
34
19
263
113
55
221
Conducted by: Accurate Traffic Counts, Inc.
Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 1
********************************************************************************
Data File Dl120001.PRN .
Station 000000000001
Identification 000000691007 Interval 15 minutes
Start date Nov 20, 98 Start time 00:00
Stop date Nov 20, 98 Stop time 24:00
City/Town OViedo county Seminole
Location SR-426, east of Lake Jessup Avenue
*******************************************************************************
Nov 20
Westbound Volume for Lane 1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11
End Time
15
30
45
00
Hr Total
00
25
6
6
9
4
01
02
03
4
2
4
8
18
04
5
7
7
16
05
27
43
52
54
60
91
124
186
35
176. 461
06
216
114
125
137
592
07
166
208
169
171
714
08
148
109
107
106
470
09
103
111
111
106
431
10
116
121
97
124
458
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
22
23
End Time
.,--
15
30
45
00
12
126
124
122
127
Hr Total 499
111
127
105
109
452
2
4
1
1
- 7
1
4
4
14
148
132
126
130
536
15
129
118
142
123
16
98
116
119
117
17
101
118
118
109
512 ~ 446
18
108
87
65
52
312
19
217
20
50
52
76
39
211
21
63
56
52
40
145
51
48
21
25
.18
20
21
23
8
16
------------~------------------------------------------------------------------
82
.
13
121
107
121
122
471
24 Hour Total :~
AM peak hour begins : 08:00 AM peak volume: 714 Peak hour factor : 0.86
PM peak hour begins : 15:00 PM peak volume: 536 Peak hour factor: 0.91
*******************************************************************************
Nov 20
Eastbound Volume for Lane 2
End Time
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11
15
30
45
00
Hr Total
00
9
10
7
8
34
01
7
3
5
1
16
02
2
4
2
1
9
03
1
5
3
4
13
04
5
o
1
3
9
05
9
13
13
14
49
163
06
27
26
35
75
326
07
80
86
85
75
84
97
100
106
08
117
83
84
87
371
09
339
10
81
93
81
84
97
79
96
140
387
412
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
22
23
End Time
15 114
30 119
45 106
00 88
Hr Total 427
12
98
112
97
111
418
13
102
151
153
123
529
14
111
110
129
147
497
15
119
135
109
140
503
16
17
158 128
135 129
140 103
154 117
Q0 477
18
330
19
96
71
93
70
247
20
73
66
52
56
222
21
53
60
55
54
179
58
43
45
33
34
21 7731
23 ~(P'fJ
23 R 3S;:
,
101
~-::~-~~;~::::::-~----::-::::-::::::-~--:::----::::-::::-::::::-~-:~:: ~
PM peak hour begins: 17:00 PM peak volume: 587 Peak hour factor: 0.93
*******************************************************************************
....
/83
-
.
.
.
Page 183
PROGRAMMED INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
Traffic Impact Study
Oviedo Marketplace
August 20, 1999
N
1
.
EXISTING
L
+-
J~~ ~
~ ,tt
J
--.
--.
T
Red Bug lake Road
SR 426
N
i
.
YEAR 2005
L
+-
J~t~ ~
J ,ttt
J
--.
--.
T
Red Bug lake Road
SR 426
oviedomarkemlace FigureA-1 ~C 2~!:::.
Programmed ANGLIN
. LOPEZ
Intersection Improvements IlINEHART
I~
.
.
.
N
i
East Lake Drive
1
J ~t
T
EXISTING
Tuskawilla Road
N
i
East Lake Drive
Jtt
J ~~ tt
,.
T
YEAR 2005
Tuskawilla Road
oviedomarkemlace FigureA-2 ~I ~~~~::aG
Programmed ANGLIN
. LOPBZ
Intersection Improvements alNBHUT
/,g~
N
i
.
EXISTING
~~~
~~~
V
Winter Springs Blvd.
Tuskawilla Road
N
!
.
YEAR 2005
~
~~~ ~
: ~ tt t
Winter Springs Blvd.
Tuskawilla Road
oviedomarkemlace RgureA-3 ~C 2~~::~G.
Programmed ANGLIN
. LOPEZ
Intersection Improvements ~INEBAIlT
I~
-
.
N
1.
EXISTING
J~~+
~~~
V
Chapman Road
..:-
SR 434
..-
,
N
. i
J ~~~ ~ ~
YEAR 2005 ~
Chapman Road
~ ~~ tt~
~
~
T
T
SR 434
. oviedomarkemlace RgureA-4 ~I :~~::RG
Programmed ANGLIN
. LOPBZ
Intersection Improvements RINBHART
(~..
~
N
t
.
EXISTING
~
J~~ +v
~ 1tr
v
Alafaya Woods Blvd.
SR 434
N
1
.
YEAR 2005
~
~~~ ~ +v
:: ~ tt~
Alafaya Woods Blvd.
SR 434
.edomarketnlace FigureA-S ~I S~[#:.
OVI ~~ Programmed ~ ~..z
Intersection Improvements JUNBHAIlT
1($
-
.
--
.
.
N
i
EXISTING
~
J~~ ~
::t ~~tt
-+ .
T
Mitchell Hammock Road
SR 434 .
N
t
~
~
~~~ ~ \
::t ~~tt~
-+
Michell Hammock Road
YEAR 2005
~
SR 434
oviedomarkemlace Figure~ ~. 2~~::RG
Programmed ANGLIN
. LOPEZ
Intersection Improvements RINEHART
/89
Dean Road
N
1 .
~
~
J~ ~
T SR 426
YEAR 2005 --+ 4~
.....
.....
,.
...
Dean Road
oV.ledomarketnlace RgureA-7 r.~~;j.G
~~ programmedl_ ,om
Intersection Improvements ..INEHUT
/t:tD
..
.
.
~
.
N
t
EXISTING
~~~
+~~
Chapman Road
SR 426
N
i
YEAR 2005
Chapman Road
SR 426
oviedomarkemlace RgureA-l ~C ~~~::RG
Programmed ANGLIN
. LOPEZ
Intersection Improvements RINEHART
/91-
Oviedo
Marketplace Blvd.
Oviedo
Marketplace Blvd.
....
N
i
.
Jt
:1 ~~ t
T
EXISTING
SR 426
N
1
.
Jtt
:1 ~~ tt
T
YEAR 2005
SR 426
oV.ledomarkemlace FigureA-9 ~. ~;i]:..
Programmed ~ LOPEZ
Intersection Improvements JUNIIHAIlT
/ 9' 1J.
-
.
N
t
EXISTING
~
~~~
-4 ~tt
T
CR 419
Lockwood Road
.
N
t
YEAR 2005
~
+-
~~~ F
::t ~t~
--+
T
CR 419
Lockwood Road
. oviedomarkemlace. FigureA-10 ~C ~~EE:G
. Programmed ANGLIN
. LOPEZ
Intersection Improvements JUNBHnT
/9,5
~,g 'l ],eeJ.,g marketplace
-- . . . .: - . . o'~: ."
. ~ ., .';
.'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I .-....-::..~r.,.~.~.;: .:>.... p'repared by:
.:. .'.',:::_':, ;:.;. : ::,u>',::. ~Iatt:irig Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez. Rinehart, Inc.
t . ". e. . .: . ;': ",., ,; '. .". ".:'
I.
I
,'. .
','
:. ',", \
.' -, .. ';."
.- .~.' '.' .'~
. . .
, ..
~. -~ . . ..
T rafficJM:() 0 ita ri ng and
. ..... .... 'i:;~~i~d"!':~e' 1'+I"n:' g'.. St"'u' dy'
, 'JYl~ . .
, -"....~ -.f '. ,. . . . .
': :.':;>:'F"~~;:;?::'.~' ,
" . . ':';. : .. ~."
", .!..
. '.;"."
. . ~ . .
.-. . .. ....
..... ..'
'; .,:.' \ -' - . ~:',!.. .. - '. '
.' .
';' .;.
. .'. ~.t .'
Prepared f9r:: :.: '. l,
The Viera COrnP~:lnY:,:::: ';: '.
',.. ...... ".-'
. .
. -. ....::..
, - .
. "',
. . .. ~.. .
October 1999
'. .
-
.
f!'"""
.
'-
.
East Central Florida Regional Planning Council
1.
The application of the cited 6% internal capture rate from page 8 on Table 3-5 on
page 15 does not agree. Please explain.
Page 8 states that internal capture is about 6% of the total trip generation, Internal
capture reported in Table 3-5 is 5.4% (488/9032),
2.
We are concerned with the SR 426 widening from Red Bug Lake Road to Winter
Springs Boulevard, since it is not in the first 3 years of an approved work program.
This will be recommended as a condition of approval. Please advise as to its status
and let us know w~at impacts will be experienced without this improvement.
The required study for amending the Long Range Plan should be submitted by Oviedo to
the MPO by October 22, 1999. The MPO review will probably take sixty days. Upon .
completion of the MPO review, the Long Range Plan can be amended.
Once the Long Range Plan is amended, the FDOT can fund construction of the widening.
The probability of construction commencing during the next three years is not known at
this time.
Because of the limited network providing access to the site form the north (Northwest
Oviedo and Geneva), it is not believed that traffic patterns will be significantly different if
the section of SR436 were analyzed as a two-lane facility.
3.
What are the current ridership numbers for transit route #47? Where are the
transit stops located? Are shelters in existence?
According to LYNX, the average week-day ridership for Route 47 is about 200 persons.
Route 47 has five stops (UCF, Alafaya Woods, Jackson Street, Oviedo High School and
Oviedo Marketplace. There are shelters at UCF and Oviedo Marketplace. A copy of the
information provided by LYNX is included in the Appendix to this Response.
4.
How was the trip distribution verified for existing traffic movement to and from the
project? Please explain how existing turning movements are representative of the
future movements.
Distribution of existing project traffic was based on turning movement volumes at project
entrances. This distribution was compared to model assignment of project traffic.
Existing turning movements were used to initially project future turning movements. The
results of this exercise were then adjusted based on side street land uses and further to
match approach volumes to departure volumes.
5.
Table 5-1 does not contain a footnote for the asterisk in the Projected LOS column.
Please provide this explanati~n.
1
E
The asterisk reference that the LOS is based on ART-PLAN (see footnote to Table 4-1).
.
6.
Please provide costs for improvements and fair share costs for improvements.
Segregate composite costs.
r
The only projected significant and adverse impacts are to the SR436/Red Bug Lake Road
and the SR434/SR426 intersections. Mitigation for these two impacts are currently being
negotiated with Seminole County, the FOOT and the City of Oviedo.
7. Regarding the interSection analyses, please address the following:
r
A.
On page 62, -and 136, the intenection analyses for Red Bug Lake Road and
Sun Drive, there is no incFease in the northbound direction. Explain why
this is the case. All approaches would logically have some increase.
The area accessed by Sun Drive south of Red Bug Lake Road is substantially
builtout; therefore, no increase in traffic was assumed for the northbound approach
to the Red Bug Lake Road/Sun Drive intersection.
B. On pages 65 and 139, the intersection analysis for Red Bug Lake Road and
Dovera Road, there is a large increase in traffic. Please check these for
accuracy and explain the source of this growth.
Dovera Road provides access to the Oviedo Marketplace DR! land uses both north .
and south of Red Bug Lake Road. Please see Figure 3-1 (Road B is Dovera
Road).
c.
On pages 71 and 145, the intenection of Dike Road and Tuskawilla Road,
there is no increase in traffic in the westbound direction. Please check and
justify.
i.:...
The area served by Dike Road east of Tuskawilla Road is substantially builtout.
The existing volume for the westbound direction is 4. Applying a growth rate of
2% per year to the total approach would only add 8 vehicles.
D.
On pages 73 and 147, the intenection of Winter Springs Blvd. and
Tuskawilla Road, there is very little increase in the eastbound direction.
Please check and justify.
The area west of Tuskawilla is about 90% builtout. Applying an annual growth
rate of two percent would only add a total of six vehicles to the eastbound lefts
and throughs combined.
2
.
"'""
.L....
.
.
.
E.
On pages 75 and 149, the intersection of Alafaya Woods Blvd. and SR 434,
there is no increase in traffic between year 1999 and 2005. Please check and
justify.
The area served by Alafaya Woods Boulevard west of SR 434 is substantially
builtout.
F.
On pages 76 and 150, the intersection of Mitchell Hammock Rd. and SR434,
year 2005 there is no right turn for the SB. Please check and justify.
The plans to widen SR434 (through the Mitchell Hammock Road intersection)
reflect a southbound channelized right-turn lane.
G.
On pages 82 and 156, the intersection of SR 426 and Tuskawilla Rd., there is
no increase in traffic for NB between year 1999 and 2005. Please check and
justify .
The area south ofSR426 is residential (west of Tuskawilla Road) which is about
80% builtout, and agricultural (groves) occupy the area east of Tuskawilla Road.
The existing northbound approach is only four (4) vehicles. Any reasonable
growth rate would only add about 8 vehicles to the approach.
H.
On pages 85 and 159, the intersection of SR 426 and Dean Rd., there is no
increase in traffic for SB between year 1999 and 2005. Please check and
justify.
The area north of Aloma Avenue is basically builtout, therefore no increase was
assumed.
L' On pages 88 and 162, the intersection of Winter Springs Blvd. and SR 426,
there is no increase for traffic for WB between year 1999 and 2005. Please
check and justify.
Winter Springs Boulevard ends at SR426. On the east side of SR426 is a branch
of Orlando Regional Medical Center which is builtout and fully occupied.
8. Please identify bow the other transportation related conditions in the development
order are being addressed. Please be as specific as possible.
A copy of the Annual Report, submitted June, 1999, is included with this response.
3
DI!
Florida Department of Transportation
r
1. Planned and Programmed Improvements: The applicant has included SR 426 from
Red Bug Lake Road to Winter Springs Boulevard as a 4-lane facility although it is
not programmed for construction within the fmt three years of the FDOT five-year
work program. The applicant states that "in the event construCtion is not scheduled
within the next three years, an appropriate condition will be included in the DO."
This is not acceptable according the existing development order which indicates that
the road network must be operating at an acceptable level of service for the project
to go forward into the next phase. Construction must be programmed in the first
three years of the work program or applicable Transportation Improvement
Program for an improvement to be used for capacity analysis. The applicant should
reanalyze SR 426 from Red Bug Lake to Winter Springs Boulevard as a 2-lane
facility.
r
It is realized that the DR! cannot go fOIWard into the next phases of development until the
construction for the widening of SR426 from Mitchell Hammock Road to Winter Springs
Boulevard is within three years. As a two-lane facility SR426 is projected to operate at
LOS ''F.''
2.
Table 2-1: The K and D factors used in the traffic study are based on 1997 FDOT
and 1996 Orange County data. The most recent data available should be used for
t"is study.
The most recent Orange County Traffic Count Report was used for all but a few of the
road segments within Orange County. The only exceptions were Aloma Avenue east of
Goldenrod, Horatio Avenue east of Maitland and SR436 north of University. The most
recent dates for these three segments is 1996.
3. Table 2-1: The K factors for the foUowing road segments are lower than aUowed by
the 1998 FDOT LOS Manual:
a) SR 436 from SR 50 to BoweD Branch Road
b) SR 426 from Lakemont Avenue to HoweD Branch Road
c) SR 426 from Winter Springs Boulevard to SR 434
All ''1('' and "D" factors are based on published data, in this case, the Orange County
Traffic Count Report.
According to the FDOT 1998 LOS Manual, Section 4-5 (page 49), the FDOT cannot
accept K factors lower than those in Table 4-4. Please adjust the K factors within
those guidelines. .
4
.
.
.
~
.
[
,.-
.
.
It was agreed during the methodology meeting that "K" and "D" factors would be based
on locally published data. This was also the case for the most recent methodology
meeting - the Westgate DR!.
4. Table 2-1: The D factor used on the following road segments is also lower than that
allowed in the LOS Manual (page 49).
a). SR 436 from University Avenue to Aloma Avenue
b) SR 551 from SR 50 to University Boulevard
c) University Boulevard from Dean Road to Rouse Road
The lowest D factor FDOT may accept is .52.
It was agreed during the methodology meeting that "K" and "D" factors would be based
on locally published data. This was also the case for the most recent methodology
meeting - the Westgate DR!.
5.
Table 2-2: The BCS analysis provided in the Appendix uses right turns on red in
the Signal Phasing. This method is inconsistent with the procedures stated in the
Highway Capacity Manual, Page 9-13. All right turn on red inputs should be
addressed in the "RTOR Volume" input area, where BCS subtracts these trips from
the hourly volumes. Right turn on red volumes are appropriate for the intersections
studied; however, the volumes should be subtracted from the hourly volumes, not in
the signal phasing.
Neither the Highway Capacity Manual nor the User Guides for HSC Version 2 are clear
on this subject. According to the Federal Highway Administration staff, you are correct.
All intersections assuming RTOR have been reanalyzed and included with this response,
6. Trip Generation Rates, Table 3-3: The PM peak hour trip generation rate for the
clinic land use shows the source to be the surveys, but the ITE rate is shown. The
dally trip generation rate for the Target store and garden center does not match the
ITE rate. The walk-in clinic land use was not in the trip generation formula table
submitted in the methodology letter. It is unclear if there has been a change or if
this was an oversight.
Table 3-3 should have reflected aPM peak hour trip generation rate of8.69 as shown on
Table 3-4, Trip Generation Survey. The PM peak-trips shown in Table 3-5 are based on
the surveyed rate, The entry for the daily trip ends for the Target store and garden center
contained a typo (6932 should have been 6782).
Table 3-5 has been revised and is included with this response.
5
,ES
The walk-in clinic was not open at the time the methodology was prepared. It was opened
shortly thereafter, so sUlVeys were conducted between methodology preparation and M/M .
study preparation.
.r
7.
Table 4-1: The trip distribution in Table 4-1 is inconsistent with Figure 3-2. The
LOS capacities for SR 426 from MitcheU Hamock Road to Winter Springs
Boulevard were determined by ART_PLAN. As noted earlier, FDOT cannot accept
K factors lower than those in the LOS Manual, Table 4-4, page 49.
r.-
The distribution showri on Figure 3-2 matches the percent of project traffic for each
segment shown in Table 4-1. For example, project traffic on the GreeneWay between
Aloma Avenue and Red Bug Lake Road is 821 (382 + 436 - Table 4-1). Dividing 821 by
7986 (pM peak-hour trip generation - Table 3-5) = 10.3% (the percentage shown on
Figure 3-2.
8.
HCS Analyses: The HCS analysis provided on page 107 is inconsistent with the HCS
analysis provided on page 134. The HCS analysis provided on page 109 is
inconsistent with the HCS analysis provided on page 134. The HCS analysis
provided on page 117 is inconsistent with the HCS analysis provided on page 143. .
The HeS analysis provided on page 131 is inconsistent with the HeS analysis
provided on page 143.
The HCS analysis on page 107 should have reflected 185. northbound through vehicles .-
instead of 160. The change does not affect the ART-PLAN analysis (east/west volumes,
percent turns, g/c ratio).
The same is true for the analysis on page 109. The northbound throughs should have been
741, not 541. This change does not affect the ART-PLAN analysis.
The analysis on page 117 should have reflected 527 northbound through vehicles instead
of 497. Because the ART-PLAN analysis only deals with the southbound approach for
this segment, the northbound approach does not impact the analysis.
The same is true for the analysis on page 131. The northbound through should have been
527 instead of 497. The ART -PLAN analysis does not use the data for the northbound
approach.
9. For the road segments analyzed.with ART_PLAN, was the significance testing based
on the adopted LOS capacities presented in the report or the ART_PLAN capacity?
H the ART_PLAN capacity was used, please submit the ART_PLAN generated
capacity thresholds.
6
.
..
.
r-
r-
.
.
Significance of project traffic was based on the service volumes at the adopted LOS
standard, not the ART-PLAN capacity,
Seminole County Public Works Department
Engineering Division
1. Revise the names of the first two segments for Aloma Avenue on Table 2-1 and
Table 5-1.
Tables 2-1 and 5-1 have been revised and are included with this response.
2. Provide figures to show the turning movment volumes for all studied intersection"s,
including background and project traffic.
Figures Seminole-l through Seminole-6 show the turning movement volumes (total and
project) for all intersections analyzed in the M/M traffic study.
3.
Use the existing signal phasing and timings for the DeS analysis and ART_PLAN
analysis. The cycle length should be kept the same in the analysis for all traffic
signals in the same control section. Please contact Seminole County Traffic
Engineering Division to obtain the existing signal phasing and timing data.
The 1998 FOOT Level of Service Handbook, page 151, states that "the cycle length for
the entire system is entered in seconds. This volume may be overridden by values entered
later in the "Specific Inputs" range, if such intersection is available." UsinKspecific
information is the more reasonable approach and is the preferred methodology of the
ECFRPC and the FOOT.
4.
Please document how the internal capture on Table 3-6 was determined.
The estimates for internal capture are based on professional judgment and were approved
during the methodology stage for use in the M/M study.
5. Please check the project p.m. peak hour directional volumes on Figure 4-1 and
Table 4-1. Are they determined based on the Net External trips on Table 3-5 and
project trip distribution on Figure 3-2?
The peak-directional volumes on Figure 4-1 and Table 4-1 represent net external trips
based on the total net external trip ends shown in Table 3-5 and the distribution of project
traffic shown on Figure 3-2.
7
!l:l'
TransCore
r
1. Although the Oviedo Marketplace does not provide significant impacts to the
Mitchell Hammock RoadlLockwood Road intersection, the total turning movement
volumes at this intersection are substantially lower than those estimated in other
recent studies in the area by applying vested and encumbered trips. Please explain
the difference.
.
~
The methodology for concurrency traffic studies does not account for any changes in
travel patterns resulting from new development and/or network changes. The
concurrency methodology is an additive process where committed trips and trips from the
proposed development are added to existing trips. The future volumes used in the .
monitoring/modeling study were generated by the model which assigns trips based on the
2005 land use projections and the 2005 roadway network. The 2005 network used in the
monitoring/modeling study included CR419 as a four-lane facility from Lockwood
Boulevard to 2nd Street, SR434 as a six-lane facility north through the Mitchell Hammock
Road intersection and SR426 as a four-lane facility from SR417 through the Mitchell
Hammock Road intersection.
2.
In a similar vein, the project trip distribution is based on survey data collected in
1998. Over time, we expect the distribution to change somewhat to reflect growth
east of SR 434 in Oviedo. Please explain why the distribution would not change.
It is anticipated that the distribution of project trips will not vary significantly over time. .
This anticipation is based on two factors: (1) the residential growth in all areas
surrounding the site and (2) the growth in competing commercial in areas surrounding the
site, especially with the retail growth in Waterford Lakes and the six laning of SR434.
3. The analysis of the SR 434/Mitchell Hammock Road intersection included an .
increase in signal cycle length. Was there any consideration of adverse impacts on
traffic flow within either the SR 434 or Mitchell Hammock Road corridors as a
result of this change in cycle length? We note that a thorough signalization plan
must be completed as part of the SR 434 improvements, one that may include signal
interconnection and/or green waves to maximize throughput. (See Seminole County
comment #3).
The change in cycle length is based on the geometric changes planned as a part of the
SR434 widening. Less green time was needed for the north/south throughs which was
allocated to the east-west movements. The analysis for Year 2005 has been revised to
reflect the existing cycle length (120 seconds).
8
.
El
.~
r
r.-
.
.
4.
We concur with FDOT that SR 426 from Red Bug Lake Road to Winter Springs
Boulevard should be analyzed as a two-lane road in this analysis. (See FDOT
comment #1).
SR426 was analyzed as a four-lane facility because of the anticipation that construction
will be programmed within the next three years. It is anticipated that the ability to proceed
with Phase 3 will be conditioned on the construction of the above improvement being
within three years.
5.
It is not clear in the report or the metll1odology letter how future turning movement
volumes were estimated. Was the TURNS4 spreadsheet analysis method used, or
were in the future volumes manually calculated based on existing volumes?
Future turning movement volumes were calculated based on existing turning movements
adjusted to match approach and departure volumes as closely as possible.
9
!~ 10/26/99 14:09 FAX 4079995444
I I
f
I .
[J~
l'l
I
Ui\X .
@001
.
B "'C' ,"""1 'P r"\ IT:' D
~.u O^,-, .w!.. \J .;....J
. oel 2 6 i9~)')
--
i
Glattir.g Jacksor. K!~d~~r
;\n~!in Lcnez Ri ~;,h' . ~ 1-'
....
;.
FACSIMJLE COVER SHEET'
,;.
PLEASE FORWARD TO INTENDED RECIPIENT OR NOTIFY THEM OF
THE ARRIVAL OF THIS MESSAGE.
,r-
TO:
. j)J'j$A .
--:-:
FROl>l.:. . r on t
NUMBER OF PAGES TO FOLLOW:
atl~, ~/n
~j olh.
2-
COlvfMENTS:
.
.4H4.J- 7ov1J /!Jap ~ sckL.
'. - 1M! 3 t4klM ~Rje".rjIP
-. ;' ,
It/oft:'" 1hV/4. aM. ,)") ellrl,L.J tAl- lic/: ~ LJ'VtLtk
mM!k I/h/;..
I
If a portioD. of this tranSmission is illegible or is not teceived.. please call the Sender at (407)841-2219.
PLEASE NOTE OUR NEW ADDRESS:
445 W. Amelia St., Suite 800, Orlando, Florida 32801-1128
--
.
EXECUTIVE DlREcroR. (407) 245-0325
EXECUTIVE (407) 245-0327
CONSTRUcrIONfENG. (407) 999-5440
{t{NANCL~ (407) 245-0326
HUMAN RESOURCES
MAillCETING
PROCUREMENT
COpy ROOM (ELC)
(407) 843-0747
(407) 245-0322
(407) 245:'0328
(407) 9'99-5441
l'I;l\l\li('l~; GC';1I1tS; 1\1(5; Mobility Assis(:It1cl:
( ,\ WI) C) I) I) - 5 ,14 4
..
I . .
[ 1 ' " I
. .
LINK 47-0vledo
~ Timepoints Are Shown
:l
:l
~ in Numbers
OVIEDO
HIGH
SCHOOL
.
3
RED BUG
LAKE RD./,
,
...
,
....
...l
....
....
....
n
:n
:n
:n
:::l
....
-'1
-.:
:....
:::l
.....
....
.....
:>>
:>>
"-
<C
"l
.....
o
.....
@ printed on rlcydod paper
wi
~I
ii
ul
I
4 JACKSON ST,
2
BROADWAY ST. I 5.R 419
1
~:
a:1
enl
I
I
MrrCHE~ HAMMOCK RD.
1
1
1
,
I
~I
Co~1
'/
"-
'.'
c
18
:~ .
,g~
. .;J en
CHAPMAN RD.
STILLWATER DR.
~
!
MC CULlOCH RD.
UNIVERSITY
. OF CENTRAL
FLORIDA
1 SUPERSTOP
1234' 521
~
.s
UCF TO OVIEDO MARKETPLACE TO
ALAFAYA WOODS TO UCF
(CLOCKWISE)
Monday. Saturday Service
''b
'b~' ~~~. 'b~'
~~ bQJ& ~~
~~ ~$ ~~
~'f-~ !:) ~ '~~c;.' ~~ ,1,.'f-~
!!..'t'~ ~~ 'it-~ ~.... ~C't'~
>l~'f- c:!'ts ~ ~ !!..'f-if ,1,.'f-
~~ "-~ ~#' ;$',..CJ ...-~ f,
~ '$ '_~ '('~ ~ C't' ~
5:ooA
7:00
9:00
11:00
l:ooP
3:00
5:00
7:00
9:00
5:09
7:09 .-
9:09
11:09
1:09
3:09
5:09
7:09
9:09
5:16
7:16,
9:16
11 :16
1:16
3:16
5:16
7:16
9:16
5:2~
7:28
9:28
11:28
1:28
3:28
5:28
7:28
9:28
5:35
7:35
9:35
11:35
1:35
3:35
5:35
7:35
9:35
5:50
7,:50
9:50
11:50
1:50
3:50
5:50
7:50
9:50
5:41
7:41
9:41
11 :41
1:41
3:41
5:41
7:41
9:41
1 2 5 4"3 2 1
~
'5
UCF TO ALAFAYA WOODS TO
OVIEDO MARKETPLACE TO UCF
(COUNTERCLOCKWISE)
Monday. Seturday Service
'b
!:). !:).
'b~' ~~
~~ ~qjsS'
~~ ~~
~ ~ ~~." 0-
~~ 'C' ~'c;.' ~J
.J.,l..,"t' ':!.,~'t'ii <i::J'f-~ ~
'(' ':!.,'f- ;$', cf ~ ~ c:::i ;!?'
~ '('~ q:>.f' $
'b~'
~~
~~
~'f-~
!!..'t'~
_ '(' ~'f-
~~ 't' '<-
~ ..$1
6:ooA 6:09 6:14 6:22 6:34 6:41 6:50
8:00 8:09 8:14 ,8:22 8:34 8:41 8:50
10:00 10:09 10:14 10:22 10:34 10:41 10:50
12:ooN 12:09 12:14 12:22 12:34 12:41 12:50
2:ooP 2:09 2:14 2:22 2:34 2:41 2:50
4:00 4:09 4:14 4:22 4:34 4:41 4:50
6:00 6:09 6:14 6:22 6:34 6:41 6:50
8;00 8:09 8:14 8:22 8:34 8:41 8:50
NOTE: NO SUNDAVIHOUDAY SERVICE
~ All LYNX buses are wheelchair accessible
.
10/26/1999
,,~\. l-'
~~~~RRR/n~ VV~ nT:~T ~~/Q1/nT
J:::
HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 10-25-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
.
Streets: (E-W) Red Bug Lake Rd.
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
(N-S) Tuskawilla Road
File Name: OM0305R.HC9
11-24-98 pm
r
t
=======================================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1
Volumes 418 1556 271 516 1261 370 317 741 460 370 598 222
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 70 90 230 206
r- Lost.Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 25.0A 67.0A Green 20.0A 25.0A
. Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0
Cycle Length: 155 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts, Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 594 3539 0.763 0.168 43.8 E 49.3 E
T 1658 3725 1.037 0.445 54.5 E
R 705 1583 0.299 0.445 17.9 C
WB L 594 3539 0.942 0.168 58.2 E 34.l. D
T 1658 3725 0.840 0.445 27.5 D
R 705 1583 0.417 0.445 19.2 C
NB L 480 3539 0.717 0.135 45.0 E 48.5 E
T 973 5588 0.881 0.174 47.1 E
R 276 1583 0.877 0.174 58.2 E
SB L 480 3539 0.836 0.135 50.7 E 44.2 E
T 973 5588 0.711 0.174 40.7 E
R 276 1583 0.062 0.174 34.5 D
Intersection Delay = 43.6 sec/veh Intersection LOS = E
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.961
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
e:
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 10-25~1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
Streets: (E-W) Red Bug Lake Road
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
(N-S) Dovera Road
File Name: OM0705R.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
~
'-
=======================================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 2 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 1
Volumes 426 1625 265 68 1571 231 115 8 89 576 8 619
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 80 75 20 250
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
,.--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * * Thru *
Right * * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * * Thru *
Right * * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right * EB Right
SB Right * WE Right
Green 30.0A 15.0A 41.0A Green 20.0A 30.0A
Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0
Cycle Length: 159 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #3 #5 #6
8
.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 690 3539 0.668 0.195 40.0 D 24.2 C
T 2706 5588 0.695 0.484 21.2 C
R 737 1583 0.265 0.465 16.8 C
WB- L 178 1770 0.404 0.101 44.1 E 30.2 D
T 2179 5588 0.835 0.390 30.5 D
R 617 1583 0.266 0.390 21.4 C
NB L 245 1770 0.494 0.138 42.2 E 33.2 D
T 258 1863 0.031 0.138 38.3 D
R 677 1583 0.108 0.428 17.6 C
SB L 712 3539 0.876 0.201 48.2 E 37.2 D
T 375 1863 0.021 0.201 32.9 D
R 747 1583 0.521 0.472 19.5 C
Intersection Delay = 28.9 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.758
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
r;:;
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 10-25-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Streets: (E-W) Red Bug Lake Road
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
(N-S) Oviedo Marketplace
File Name: OM0805R.HC9
11-24-98 pm
r
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
----
No. Lanes 2 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 1
Volumes 477 1570 107 340 1585 375 86 62 237 502 54 619
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 20 80 87 120
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
r-
---------------------~-------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 .7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left * *
Thru * Thru * *
Right * Right * *
Peds Peds
NB Right . EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 28.0A 43.0A Green 25.0A 15.0A
. Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0
Cycle Length: 130 secs Phase combination .order: #1 #2 #5 #6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 789 3539 0.655 0.223 31.1 D 32.6 D
T 1934 5588 0.940 0.346 33.7 D
R 548 1583 0.168 0.346 19.1 C
WB L 395 1770 0.907 0.223 48.8 E 35.3 D
T 1934 5588 0.949 0.346 34.7 D
R 548 1583 0.568 0.346 23.4 C
NB L 193 1474 0.472 0.131 35.2 D 39.8 D
T 244 1863 0.267 0.131 33.0 D
R 207 1583 0.758 0.131 45.2 E
SB L 1013 3539 0.537 0.362 20.7 C 29.6 D
T 674 1863 0.085 0.362 17.7 C
R 572 1583 0.919 0.362 40.0 D
Intersection Delay = 33.5 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v / c (x) = 0.927
--------------------------------------------~--------------------------
.
a
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2~4g 10-25-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
Streets: (E-W) Red Bug Lake Road
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
(N-S) SR426
File Name: OM1105R.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
...
,
=======================================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1
Volumes 584 1106 406 254 1006 398 217 527 390 328 464 491
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 80 130 125 200
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
r:-
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 . 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right * WB Right
Green 24.0A ~O. OA Green 27.0A 20.0A
Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 .
Cycle Length: 131 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay ~~: prcd.
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -
EB L 702 3539 0.901 0.198 43.7 E 47.2 E
T 1194 3725 1.023 0.321 54.6 E
R 508 1583 0.676 0.321 27.4 D
WB L 351 1770 0.760 0.198 38.4 D 35.3 D
T 1194 3725 0.931 0.321 37.2 D
R 508 1583 0.556 0.321 24.8 C
NB L 392 1770 0.582 0.221 31.1 D 57.1 E
T 626 3725 0.932 0.168 49.9 E r
R 266 1583 1 . 049 0.168 93.4 F
SB L 392 1770 0.880 0.221 45.9 E 36.4 D
T 626 3725 0.818 0.168 39.8 D
R 616 1583 0.497 0.389 20.1 C
Intersection Delay = 43.7 sec/veh Intersection LOS = E
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.967
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
-
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 10-25-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
. .
.
Streets: (E-W) Mitchell Hammock Rd
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
(N-S) Lockwood Blvd.
File Name: OM1205R.HC9
11-24-98 pm
r
i:.'
=======================================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
- --- - - -- ---- - - --
No. Lanes 1 > 1 1 1 2 < 0 1 2 1 1 1 1
Volumes 612 92 689 54 63 18 620 460 57 115 330 402
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 200 0 15 180
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
~
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 25.0A 8.0A Green 40 . OA 20.0A
. Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0
Cycle Length: 112 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 427 1770 0.860 0.241 37.5 D 36.8 D
LT 433 1796 0.864 0.241 37.7 D
R 565 1.583 0.909 0.357 35.5 D
WB L 158 1.770 0.361 0.089 31.6 D 31.2 D
TR 322 3601 0.277 0.089 30.9 D
NB L 648 1770 1.008 0.366 52.1 E 41.3 E
;... T 732 3725 0.694 0.196 29.0 D
R 311 1583 0.142 0.196 24.0 C
SB L 648 1770 0.187 0.366 15.6 C 40.4 E
T 366 1863 0.948 0.196 53.3 E
R 311 1583 0.753 0.196 34.1 D
Intersection Delay = 39.0 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v / c (x) = 0.957
--------------------~--------------------------------------------------
.
r::
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 10-25-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
(N-S) Tuskawilla Road
File Name: OM1305R.HC9
11-24-98 pm
Streets: (E-W) Dike Road
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
(
.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
--- - - - -- - --- --- - - - -- - --- -- -- - - --
No. Lanes 1 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 1 2 < 0 1 2 1
Volumes 441 1 233 1 1 2 200 1278 2 3 1206 397
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 -0 50
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
~
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
234
7
8
5 6
* *
* *
* *
Phase Combination 1
EB Left
Thru
Right
Peds
WE Lef t
Thru
Right
Peds
NB Right
SB Right
Green
Yellow/AR
Cycle Length: .
NB Left
Thru
Right
Peds
SB Left
Thru
Right
Peds
EB Right
WB Right
Green
Yellow/AR
Phase combination order:
.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
8.0A 18.0A
4.0 5.0
#1 #5 #6
15.0A
5.0
55 secs
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lane Group:
Mvrnts Cap
Intersection Performance Summary
Adj Sat v/e g/C
Flow Ratio Ratio Delay
LOS
Approach:
Delay LOS
EB L 541 1749 0.858 0.309 20.7 C 17.2 C
TR 490 1584 0.502 0.309 10.7 B
WE LTR 429 1388 0.009 0.309 8.5 B 8.5 B
NB L 425 1770 0.496 0.582 6.7 B 5.7 B
TR 2167 3725 0.652 0.582 5.5 B
SB L 136 373 0.022 0.364 7.3 B 23~3 C
T 1355 3725 0.983 0.364 26.7 D
R- 576 1583 0.634 0.364 11.0 B
Intersection Delay = 15.1 see/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.887
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
~
HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 10-25-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
(N-S) Tuskawilla Road
File Name: OM1405R.HC9
11-24-98 pm
. Streets: (E-W) Lake Drive
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
r
=======================================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 1 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 2 1
Volumes 303 593 484 1146 1226 192
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
r.- RTOR Vols 120 50 0
Lost Time 3.00 -3 .00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
-------------------------------------------------------------------.----
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru Thru * *
Right * Right
Peds Peds
WB Left SB Left
Thru Thru *
Right Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
. SB Right WB Right
Green 17.0A Green 23.0A 40 . OA
Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0
Cycle Length: 94 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lane Group:
Mvrnts Cap
Intersection Performance Summary
Adj Sat v/c g/C
Flow Ratio Ratio Delay
LOS
Approach:
Delay LOS
EB L 358 1770 0.892 0.202 40.0 D 35.5 D
R 640 3~67 0.880 0.202 33.0 D
NB L 904 3539 0.580 0.255 20.5 C 8.4 B
T 2735 3725 0.463 0.734 3.3 A
SB T 1665 3725 0.815 0.447 16.9 C 16.1 C
R 707 1583 0.286 0.447 10.7 B
Intersection Delay = 16.9 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.766
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
[;~
HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 10-25-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
Streets: (E-W) Mitchell Hammock Rd
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
(N-S) SR434
File Name: OM180SR.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
I:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
- --- ---- - - -- - - --
No. Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 < 0 2 3 < 0 1 2 0
Volumes 174 1211 612 210 959 137 582 .788 244 200 593
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 180 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
~
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Phase Combination 1
EB Left
Thru
Right
Peds
WB Left
Thru
Right
Peds
NB Right
SB Right
Green
Yellow/AR
Cycle Length:
Signal Operations
3 4
*
*
*
NB Left
Thru
Right
Peds .
SB Left
Thru
Right
Peds
EB Right
WB Right
Green 23.0A 27.0A
Yellow / AR 4. 0 5 . 0 .
combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6
5
*
6
7
8
*
2
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
12.0A 40.0A
4.0 5.0
120 secs Phase
.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 254 1770 0.720 0.483 24.4 C 43.8 E
T 1304 3725 1.027 0.350 51.2 E
R 554 1583 0.821 o .35.0 29.7 D
wE L 254 1770 0.870 0.483 39.3 D 35.6 D
TR 1280 3656 0.946 0.350 35.0 D
NB L 708 3539 0.89J. 0.200 39.8 D 37.5 D
TR 1303 5390 0.917 0.242 36.2 D
SB L 416 1770 0.507 0.467 15.6 C 25.8 D
T 900 3725 0.728 0.242 29.1 D
Intersection Delay = 37.4 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.964
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Ii:
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 10-25-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
. Streets: (E-W) SR434
, Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
r Comment: Year 2005 with project
(N-S) Tuskawilla Road
File Name: OM2205R.HC9
11-24-98 pm
=======================================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
---- ---- ---- ----
No. Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 < 0 1 > 1 1 1 1 1
Volumes 42 1211 782 65 925 18 606 60 86 40 75 30
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 120 0 0 0
r- Lost Time 3.00 3.00-3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
------------------------------------------------------------------~----
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right' *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
. Green 8.0A 44.0A Green 22.0A 15.0A
Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0
Cycle Length: 108 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5-#6
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj S-at v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS, Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 216 1770 0.204 0.537 10.0 B 32.5 D
T 1587 3725 0.844 0.426 21.1 C
R 674 1583 1.034 0.426 55.8 E
WB L 216 1770 0.315 0.537 12.6 B 16.5 C
TR 1582 .3715 0.659 0.426 16.7 C
NB L 393 1770 0.893 0.222 41.7 E 38.8 D
LT 398 1789 0.880 0.222 40.1 E
R 352 1583 0.259 0.222 22.5 C
SB L 279 1770 0.151 0.157 25.4 D 25.7 D
T 293 1863 0.269 0.157 26.0 D
R 249 1583 0.128 0.157 25.3 D
Intersection Delay = 29.1 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.809
~.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
-
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 10-25-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Streets: (E~W) SR434
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
(N-S) CR419
File Name: OM2305R.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
[
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1
Volumes 56 1360 890 666 807 62
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 360 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
r.-
---------------------.--------------------------------------------------
.-
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6
EB Left * * NB Left
Thru * * Thru
Right Right
Peds Peds
WB Left SB Left *
Thru * Thru
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 10.0A 38.0A Green 52.0A
Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0
Cycle Length: 114 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5
7
8
.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lane Group:
Mvrnts Cap
Intersection Performance Summary
Adj Sat v/c g/C
Flow Ratio Ratio Delay
LOS
Approach:
Delay LOS
L
EB L 236 1770 0.250 0.474 13.2 B 19.9 C
T 1764 3725 0.8520.474 20.1 C
WB T 1307 3725 0.753 0.351 22.8 C 22.3 C
R 555 1583 0.580 0.351 20.6 C
SB L 8381770 1.013 0.474 46.4 E 43.8 E
R 750 1583 0.087 0.474 10.6 B
Intersection Delay = 26.5 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.932
--------------------------------------------------------------------~--
'"
.
-
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 10-25-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
(N-S) Tuskawilla Road
File Name: OM2405R.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
Streets: (E-W) SR426
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
[
============================~==========================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
No. Lanes 2 2 < 0 1 2 1 1 1 < 0 2 1 1
Volumes 549 1255 1 1 886 . 855 1 1 2 634 1 490
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 300 0 100
..- Lost Time 3.00 3.00-3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * * Thru *
Right * * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
. SB Right WB Right
Green 22.0A 42.0A Green 29.0A
Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0
Cycle Length: 107 sees Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 761 3539 0.782 0.215 29.3 D 13.6 B
TR 2437 3725 0.570 0.654 6.8 B
WB L 93 227 0.011 0.411 12.0 B 21.7 C
T 1532 3725 0.640 0.411 16.9 C
R 651 1583 0.897 0.411 29.8 D
'- NB L 512 1768 0.002 0.290 17.4 C 17.5 C
TR 486 1676 0.006 0.290 17.5 C
SB L 963 3322 0.714 0.290 23.7 C 28.9 D
T 540 1863 .0.002 0.290 17.4 C
R 459 1583 0.896 0.290 37.6 D
Intersection Delay = 19.9 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 see Critical v/c(x) = 0.870
-----------------------------------------------------~-----------------
.
E
HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 10-25-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
(N-S) Dean Road
File Name: OM2705R.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
Streets: (E-W) SR426
Analyst:JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
=======================================================================
r
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
- - -- --- - --- - - - --
No. Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 > 1 1 0 > 1 1
Volumes 11 943 673 377 707 5 576 5 394 1 .4 16
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 150 0 100 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.0.0 3.00 3.00 3.00
l'""""
--------------------~--------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * * SB Left *
Thru * * Thru *
Right * * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right * EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 28.0A 46.0A Green 52.0A
Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 .
Cycle Length: 140 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay ~~:rd).
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 112 328 0.107 0.343 -20.3 C 41.3 E
T 1277 3725 0.817 0.343 30.1 D -e-
R 543 1583 1.013 0.343 62.9 F.
WB L 420 1770 0.945 0.571 50.4 E 23.9 C
T 2129 3725 0.367 0.571 10.6 B
R 905 1583 0.006 0.571 8.3 B
NB LT 667 1728 0.917 0.386 39.0 D 27.1 D
R 1187 1583 0.261 0.750 3.5 A
SB LT 636 1649 0.008 0.386 17.1 C 17.2. C
R 611 1583 0.028 0.386 17.2 C
Intersection Delay = 32.1 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.971
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
-
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 10-25-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
Streets: (E-W) Oviedo Marketplace
. Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
(N-S) SR426
File Name: OM2905R.HC9
11-24-98 pm
=======================================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound.
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 2 0 1 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 2 1
Volumes 158 460 401 1497 1110 238
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 120 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
r-
---------------------~.-----------------------~-------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru Thru * *
Right * Right
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left
Thru Thru *
Right Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
. Green 30.0A Green 28.0A 55.0A
Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0
Cycle Length: 127 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lane Group:
Mvrnts Cap
Intersection Performance Summary
Adj Sat v/c g/C
Flow Ratio Ratio Delay
LOS
Approach:
Delay LOS
EB L 892 3539 0.192 0.252 24.1 C 38.5 D
R 399 1583 0.898 0.252 45.4 E
NB L 808 3539 0.538 0.228 28.4 D 11.4 B
T 2610 3725 0.634 0.701 7.0 B
SB T 1672 3725 0.733 0.449 19.8 C 19.0 C
R 710 1583 0.353 0.449 14.9 B
Intersection Delay = 17.6 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.730
l
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
E!
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 10-25-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
Streets: (E-W) Winter Springs Blvd
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
(N-S) SR426
File Name: OM3005R.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
.-
(.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
- - -- - - --
No. Lanes 1 1 1 0 > 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1
Volumes 219 10 481 58 13 15 708 947 7 2 580 194
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 120 0 0 70
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
~
----------------------,-------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru * *
Right * Right * *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 30.0A Green 28.0A 46.0A
Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0
Cycle Length: 118 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6
.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 371 1367 0.623 0.271 26.7 D 34.8 D
T 505 1863 0.022 0.271 20.4 C
R 429 1583 0.885 0.271 40.2 E
WB LT 468 1725 0.160 0.271 21.2 C 21.1 C
R 429 1583 0.037 0.271 20.5 C
NB L 870 3539 0.882 0.246 35.2 D 21.4 C
T 1263 1863 0.789 0.678 10.9 B
R 1073 1583 0.007 0.678 4.0 A
SB L 69 170 0.029 0.407 13.6 B 22.7 C
T 758 1863 0.806 0.407 24.4 C
R 644 1583 0.202 0.407 14.6 B
Intersection Delay = 24.3 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v / c (x) = 0.850
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Ie
.
r
r
.
.
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 10-25-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=============================================================='=========
Streets: (E-W) SR426
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
(N-S) Lake Jessup
File Name: OM3105R.HC9
11-24-98 pm
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
- --- - - -- - --- - - -- -- -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - --
No. Lanes 1 1 < 0 1 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 1
Volumes 224 855 101 11 545 52 79 97 45 76 63 108
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 9.0A 42.0A Green 19.0A
Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0
Cycle Length: 84 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5
Lane Group:
Mvrnts Cap
Intersection Performance Summary
Adj Sat v/c g/C
Flow Ratio Ratio Delay
LOS
Approach:
Delay LOS
EB L 300 1770 0.787 0.679 21.3 C 43.5 E
TR 960 1833 1.048 0.524 48.7 E
WB L 300 1770 0.040 9.679 10.0 B 10.5 B
TR 963 1838 0.653 0.524 10.5 B
NB LTR 312 1250 0.742 0.250 25.0 C 25.0 C
SB LT 168 674 0.866 0.250 43.2 E 31.5 D
R 396 1583 0.288 0.250 16.6 C
Intersection Delay = 31.5 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.991
I!:;
HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 10-25-1999
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
=======================================================================
Streets: (E-W) CR419
Analyst: JJM
Area Type: Other
Comment: Year 2005 with project
(N-S) Lockwood Blvd
File Name: OM3205R.HC9
11-24-98 pm
.
..-
I
=======================================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
- - -- - - -- - - -- - - --
No. Lanes 1 2 1 2 2 < 0 1 1 1 1 2 < 0
Volumes 41 413 365 581 279 44 209. .324 724 45 152 44
Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 40 0 200 0
Lost Time. 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
~
----------------------"-------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * * Thru *
Right * * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right * EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 23.0A 23.0A Green 22.0A 13.0A
Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 .
Cycle Length: 100 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lane Group:
Mvrnts Cap
Intersection Performance Summary
Adj Sat v/c g/C
Flow Ratio Ratio Delay
LOS
Approach:
Delay LOS
EB L 207 828 0.208 0.250 19.2 C 26.8 D
T 931 3725 0.491 0.250 21.1 C
R 396 1583 0.864 0.250 35.5 D
WB L 849 3539 0.742 0.240 25.1 D 19.0 C
TR 1898 3650 0.188 0.520 8.3 B
NB L 425 1770 0.518 0.240 22.2 C 20.8 C
T 447 1863 0.763 0.240 28.1 D
R 760 1583 0.725 0.480 15.8 C
SB L 266 1770 0.177 0.150 24.0 C 24.9 C
TR 540 3601 0.400 0.150 25.1 D
Intersection Delay = 22.2 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.724
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
l:r.:
f'1I8o 4
1
. E+C s.mce
i.-aI Aa:epI- V..... EldIIbt& PM Poak-B.....
Sepmlt FadII1y aWe Accept LOS DaDy Peak ~Tramc
R....... FreID - To T.... LOS IPHlPD' V.lallle K D D1r. NBlEB SBIWB LOS
r Semonm Bo1lI.-d (sR 4.,;'\ SIUO-~BMI. 6 ART D 2780 54.713 0.0740 0.5320 NB 2.154 1.895 C
I 56.020 0.0739 0.5146 NB 2.1301 2.009 c
umv...itv BMI. - AIoma An. 6 ART D 2780
AIoma Ave. - HmroIl tnDdl Rd. 6 ART D 2780 56.020 0.0762 0.5220 NB 2.2281 2,040 C
Howell tnDdlRd. -1AkcmoDtAve. 6 ART D 2780 52,949 0.0880 0.S680 NB 2,647 2,013 0
LaDmout Ave. -Red-l.Ako Rd. 6 ART D 2780 92-949 .0.0880 0.S680 NB 4.646 3~~34 F
Red _l.Ako Rd. - US 17-92 6 ART D 2780 79.410 0.0880 0.S680 EB 3,969 3.019 F
US 17-92 - CR 427 6 ART D 2780 59,297 0.0880 0.S680 EB 2,964 2,254 F
CiollIomocl Rood (SR 551) SR 50 . UaiverIitv BMI. 4 ART E ISSO 31.692 0.0810 0.s070 SB 1,266 1,301 B
umv...itv BMI. - AIoma Ave. 4 ART E 2200 24.754 0.0845 0.5727 NB 1.198 894 C
Dodd Rood lIowdl tnDdl Rd. - Di1<o Rd. 4COL E 2200 12,829 0.0910 0.S680 NB 663 504 B
Di1<o Rd. . Red Bual.Ako Rd. 4COL E 2200 9.975 0.0910 0.S680 NB 516 392 B
1'1lII:a1ri1la_ _ An. - Di1<o Rd. 4 ART E 2200 18,390 0.0910 0.S680 NB .951 723 B
Di1<o Rd. - Red B=l.Ako Rd. 6 ART E 3300 25.731 0.0910 0.S680 SB 1.012 1.330 B
Rocl Baa l.Ako Rd. . l.Ako Dr. 4 ART E 2200 25.080 0.0910 0.S680 NB 1,2S16 986 C
r- lAke Dr. . Wint2r SmiDD B/vd. 4 ART E 2200 21.414 0.0910 0.S680 SB 842 1.107 C
W_ ~BIvd.. SR434 - 4 ART E 2200 14,.226 0.0910 0.S680 SB 559 735 B
- QnceWov SRSO. ~BMt. 4m) D 3270 38,730 0.0920 0.S680 NB 2,024 1.539 C
umv...itv BMI. - AIoma An. 4m) D 3270 28.280 0.0920 0.5680 NB 1.418 1.124 B
AIoma Ave. - Red Bua l.Ako Rd. 4m) D 3270 23,200 0.0920 0.S680 NB 1.212 922 B
Roclllug l.Ako Rd. - SR U4 H'(2) D 3270 16.000 0.0920 0.S680 NB 836 636 A
SR 434 -l.Ako Mmv II!Yd. 4Fr.n D 3270 14.700 0.0920 0.S680 NB 768 S84 A
Dem Rood SR SO :t~1I!Yd. 4 ART E ISSO 22,623 0.0940 0.57SO SB 904 1,223 B
umv...itv B/vd. - McCl:IIIocb Rei. 2 ART E 880 14.890 0.0974 0.5975 NB 867 S84 0
McClIIIocI1 Rd. . AIoma A_ 2 ART E 1000 15.484 0.0910 0.S680 NB 800 609 D
~Rd. SR SO - UaiverIitv B/vd. 2COL E 830 12,018 0.1036 0.5221 NB 653 598 D
SR 434 SRSO~BMI. 6 ART E 2780 48.429 0.0821 0.5S87 NB 2,221 1.755 C
I~I!M\.-~BMI. 6 ART E 2780 36.906 0.0842 0.6576 NB 2,043 1.064 C
Corponle ERvel. - McCl:IIIocb Rd. 6 ART E 2780 36,906 0.0842 0.6576 NB 2,043 1.064 C
McCaDoch Rd. - CbaDmm Rd. 6 ART E 3100 32,761 0.0880 0.5680 NB 1.638 1,246 B
Chommm Rei.. Ala&Ya Woodt Blvd. 6 ART E 3100 22.214 0.0880 0.S680 NB 1.110 844 A
AIa&.a Woodt B/vd. - MilcheD Hm=oct Rd. 6 ART E 3100 30.537 0.0880 0.S680 NB 1.526 .1.161 B
MilcheD _ocI< Rd. - AIoma Ave. 2 ART D 880 17.338 0.0880 0.S680 58 659 867 D
_ Ave. . OreeIleWov 2 ART D 880 17,239 0.0880 0.5680 WB 6S5 862 0
ar-Wav. '\'aJbwiIIa Rd. 4 ART D 2480 18,617 0.0880 0.S680 WB 708 931 B
TaIbwiIIa Rd. - SR 419 4 ART E 2480 33.121 0.0880 0.S680 EB 1.656 1.259 C
SR 419 - US 17-92 4 ART E 2480 26.761 0.0880 0.5680 EB 1.338 1.017 C
US 17-92 - CR G7 4 ART E 2480 34.809 0.0880 0.S680 EB 1.740 1.323 0
Lockwood Rood McCaIIoch Rd. - Seminole Creek Dr. 4 ART E ISSO 11.879 0.0910 0.S680 NB 614 467 B
Seminole Creek Dr. - Little EcoD River 4 ART E ISSO 11.879 0.0910 005680 NB 614 467 B
Little EcoD River - MitohcIlllommocl< Rd. 4 ART E 1850 10.922 0.0910 0.S680 NB 56S 429 B'
Mill::heI1 Hm=oct Rd. -SR419 4 ART E 1850 17.923 0.0910 0.S680 NB 926 105 B
SHI9 - CR 426 2 ART E 1710 4.094 0.0910 0.5680 NB 212 161 A
.. McClIDoch Rood SR 434 . Lockwood Rd. 4 ART D 2200 12,244 0.0910 0.S680 EB 633 481 B
umve..itv Bo1lI.-d SR 436 - 00Id0m0cl ReI. 6 ART E 2780 47.837 0.082ll 0.6005 EB 2,379 1,582 C
00Idem0cl Rd. - Eocm Tr. 6 ART E 2780 44.609 0.0946 0.5983 EB 2,525 1.695 C
&em Tr. . ClnauIWov 6 ART E 2780 44.609 0.0946 0.s983 EB 2,S25 1.695 C
o.-oWay - Dan Rd. 6 ART E 2780 S6.586 0.0913 Oo5S04 EB 2.844 2,323 F
Dem Rd. - _ Rd. 6 ART E 2780 57,266 0.0872 0.5049 WB 2,472 2,521 C
_ Rd. . AWWw. Tr. 6 ART E 2780 44.740 0.0865 0.5815 WB 1620 '2~ C
T"ld-l
RnbelI
EXJSI1NG CONDmoNS, YE.Ull'"
o.w. Mark&tpIMe
0clDber 11 1999
Nolo: FociIiIy type oDll..",cnolmllcs orelluocl GIIlbo 1ocol pMlID1IlCIl1 ~... orlbojalildictioD in wbich lbo IOOlIny _t!IIl io \ocollod
A<c:cplahIe bmI or.moo i1l1uoc1cmlbo ~ ... orthe COOIlty in which lbo IIlOdway IDgIDllllI i11OCl11l!d
~ bmI or.moo IZId .............. for tile FUlS i1_1iJbec1 by the fOOT
RapomiIlIoI_ io Ibe _ _boo _......,...;biIi r",the......tw.y
_: GktlrIng~ Xo<M, AngIbt ~ RJtwIDor. /nc.
.
l!:':
Pap 5
T....:&-1 (CIlllllaMll)
R'"
EXJS11NG CONDmoNS, YEAR I",
09We MarUIpbce
0cI0ber II 1999
r-
E+C Sema
IA-' ......... V~ E>dIIbIC PM peak-a....
SepIeat hdIIty .w. .uapt LOS DaII1 Peak DIrec1InaI Tnft1c
R- Frem - T. T- LOS n>RIP1l\ v._ K D D1r. NBlEB SBIWB LOS
Alama Ave. (SR 426) US 17-92 - LabmoDt Ave. 4 ART E 1850 46.606 0.0880 0.s680 NB 2;330 I.m F
LabmoDt Ave. - SR 436 4 ART E 1850 46,606 0.0703 0.5794 EB 1.898 1.378 F
SR 436 - 00Idar0cI RAI. 4 ART E 1850 38,655 0.0756 0.5469 EB I.m 1,324 C
OoIdemoc1 RAI. - HOftI\ Bzmch RAI. 4 ART E 1890 27,36ll 0.0721 OSlIO EB 1.127 847 B
HOftI\ Bzmch RAI. - TaIbwiIIa RAI. 4 ART E :mo 29.083 0.0880 0.s680 EB 1.454 1.106 C
TuIb1riIIa RAI. - OreeDeWav 4 ART E :mo 29.641 0.0880 0.s680 WB 1.127 1.482 C
ClreaIeWay - Oeon RAI. 4 ART E :mo 24,344 0.0880 0.s680 ED 1,217 92S B
Oeon RAI. - Chmmum Rei. 4 ART E :mo 20.157 0.0880 0.s680 NB 1.008 766 B
; Chmmm RAI. - SIavia RAI. 4 ART E :mo 19.498 0.0880 0.s680 NB 915 741 B
SIavia RAI. - MiIcIleIl HammocIt RAI. 4 ART E :mo 19.498 0.0880 0.s680 NB 915 741 B
MiIcIleIl ~ RAI.. Oviedo ~ B1vel. 4 ART D 1850 24,401 0.0880 0.s680 NB 1.220 928 B
Oviedo Blvd. - WiDIor """"'" Blvd. 4 ART D 1850 24.401 0.0880 0.s680 NB 1.220 928 B
W. ""-'-"" St. ....R 4');\ W_SmiolzsBlvd.. Loke _ Dr. 2 ART D 880 18.740 0.0701 0.s680 EB 746 568 C
Lab 1-= Dr. -SR434 2 ART D 880 12,458 0.0775 0.5507 EB 532 434 B
0eDeva Dr. ICR 426\ CR 419 - LockwoocI RAI. 2COL E 1000 7.729 0.0910 0.s680 EB 399 304 A
Lod<woocI RAI. - SemiDoIe WoocIo Blvd. 2COL D 1000 6.992 0.0910 0.s680 EB 361 275 A
HomlioAvame US 17-92 -1biIde La. - 4 ART D 1850 35.096 0.0831 0.6253 EB 1.868 1.119 F
HOftI\ Bnmch ThiIlIe La. - Loke HOftI\ RAI. 4 ART D 1850 26.792 0.0910 0.s680 ED 1,385 1.053 C
Lab HOftI\ RAI. - SR 436 4 ART D 1850 30,362 0.0910 0.s680 EB 1,569 1.194 C
SR 436 - Dike RAI. 4 ART 0.20% 2220 24,382 0.0910 0.s680 EB 1,260 959 B
Dike RAI. - Dodd RAI. 4 ART 0.20% 2220 14.464 0.0910 0.s680 ED 748 S69 B
Dodd RAI. . AIoma Ave. 4 ART 0+20'l0 2220 14.783 0.0910 0.s680 ED 764 581 B
Dike Rood HOftI\ I!nDch RAI. - Dodd Rd 2 ART E 1000 8.777 0.0910 0.s680 NB 454 345 A
Dodd RAI. - TaIbwiIIa RAI. 2 ART E 1000 7,379 0.0910 0.s680 WB 290 381 A
Slavia Rood Red Il1IR Uke RAI. - Aloma Ave. 2 ART E 1000 6.937 0.0910 0.s680 ED 359 273 A
Red Bag Loke Rood SR 436 . WiDIor pm: RAI. 6 ART E 3300 52,270 0.0910 0.s680 ED 2,702 2,055 E
Wmla" pm: RAI. .1!aOIJl Cirde 6 ART E 3300 52,270 0.0910 0.s680 ED 2,702 2,055 E
I!Igle Cirde - Noddm.r PiIleI Way 4 ART E 2200 42,561 0.0910 0.s680 ED 2.200 1.613 0
NocI4iIm PiIleI Way - Dodd RAI. 4 ART E 2200 42.567 0.0910 0.s680 ED 2.200 1.613 0
Dodd RAI. . TaIbwiIIa RAI. 4 ART E 2200 42,567 0.0910 0.s680 ED 2,200 1.613 0
TuIb1riIIa RAI. - Sun Dr. 6 ART E 3300 32,151 0.0910 0.s680 ED 1.662 1,264 C
San Dr. - CitIm RAI. 6 ART E 3300 31.556 0.0910 0.s680 ED 1.631 1,241 C
CitIm RAI. - SIavia RAI. 6 ART E 3300 34.974 0.0910 0.s680 ED 1.80S 1,375 C
SlaviaRAI. -SilIl_ 1_ 6 ART E 3300 27.499 0.0910 0.s680 ED 1.421 1.081 B
SilIl_ looaIb - Dovera RAI. 6 ART E 3300 27.499 0.0910 0.s680 ED 1.421 1.081 B
Dovera RAI. - Oviedo NaIbIpIaee BIvcL 6 ART E 3300 27.499 0.0910 0.s680 ED 1.421 1.081 B
Oviedo Blvd. - Tornt_ 6 ART E 3300 27.499 0.0910 0.s680 ED 1.421 1.081 B
Tapt _. OreeDeW... 6 ART E 3300 27.499 . 0.0910 O.S61lO ED 1.421 1,081 B
OrwneW... - AIomaAve. 6 ART E 3300 35.756 0.0910 0.s680 ED 1848 1406 0
MitchdI Hommoct Rood A1amaAve..SR434 4 ART E 1850 30.134 0.0830 O.s9llO ED 1.496 I.GOS C
SR 434 . Lockwood RAI. 4 ART E 1850 23.469 0.0830 0.59llO EB 1.165 783 B
i~RAI. SR 426. SR 434 4COL E 2200 11.097 0.0910 O.S61lO ED 574 436 B
SemiDoIa BoaIevI:nI US 17-92 - Loke Dr. 4COL D 2200 ts.232 0.0910 O.S61lO ED 187 599 B
Loke Drive SemiDaIa BIvcL - Talkawi1la RAI. 4COL E 2200 9.971 0.0910 O.S61lO ED 515 392 B
CR419 SR 434 - Lod<woocI RAI. 2COL E 1000 9.893 0.0910 O.S61lO ED 511 389 B
Lockwood RAI. . Secald St. 4COL E 1850 15.145 0.0910 O.S61lO ED 783 595 B
WiDIor SIlimD BoaIevI:nI SR426 . NarIbem Way 4COL D 1640 12.260 0.0910 O.S61lO WB 634 482 C
NoIIbem W... - N_ W... 2COL D 830 7,284 0.0910 0.s680 WB 376 286 C
NoIIbem Way . TaIka_ RAI. 2COL D 830 7,384 0.0910 O.S61lO ED 382 290 C
w_ -W_ D 0 EB . S7
.
r
.
N_ ~ type m1..me. """-.... baed 011 tbe 1ocoI pl"mIDIlOII1 compre\uoIIMl pia oftbe jlIIiodiolion ill wbicIl tbo........,. oqpIIIlIIl iI '-W
AccepaIU 1eYd of..me. iI baed 011 tile .........a.....:... pia of tile -=Y ill which tile I'l*hray.......,m iI '-W
AoceplabIe 1eYdof_ m1__ for tile f1JiSio ~ by tile FOOT
~ OflI'IICYiltbe OflI'IICY_bu ~ rapomibility for tile roedway
Source: GIDfIitrg Jot:bon Knchv ~ lApu Ritrrhttn. bt<.
.
B
.
r
r-
.
;..
.
Page 15
Table 3-5
SUMMARY OF DAILY AND PM PEAK-HOUR TRIP GENERATION, YEAR 2005
Oviedo Marketplace
DaUy . Dally PM Peak-Hour
LutdUse Parcel ITE Intemltv Trio Ends Rate Total Rate In Out
Phase I. & Ib - Approved
Office 18 710 50,050 GFA 780 0.0 135 0.0 23 112
lutIlce 19 710 37,750 GFA 628 16.6 122 3.2 21 101
Convemence wilh gas 20 853 2,720 GFA 2,300 845.6 170 02.6 85 85
I Clulis 21A (1) 5,683 GFA 741 130.3 -68 12.0 42 26
Target W11h Garden Center 21B (1) 128,634 GLA 6,782 52.7 401 3.1 213 189
Wellness Center 22 (J) 39.000 GFA 1,677 43.0 163 4.2 91 72
I Retail 23 820 12,205 GLA 1,763 144.4 157 12.8 75 81
Steak-n-SbaJa: 24 (I) 3,508 GFA 457 130.3 51 14.4 29 22
" KellIiJ 24W 820 14.997 GLA 2,013 134.2 180 12.0 86 93
Fazolis 25 (J) 3,206 GFA 418 130.3 57 17.8 35 22
.Borders Boon 26 (2) 24,610 GFA 1,001 40.7 41 1.9 32 16
Jared Jewelers 26 (2) 6,052 GFA 246 40.7 56 9.3 20 36
IQuality Restaurant 28 831 11,200 GLA 1,007 90.0 84 7.5 56 28
Family l'unera1 Care 29 (3) 8,682 GFA 79 9.1 6 0.7 3 3
High Twnover Restaurant 30 832 7,000 GF A 912 130.3 76 10.9 46 30
Retai1 31 820 15,000 GLA 2,013 134.2 180 12.0 86 93
Quality Restaurant 32 831 6,700 GFA 603 90.0 50 7.5 34 17
Phase 2 - Approved
Regional Shoppmg Center 12 820 1.100,000 GLA 31,850 29.0 3.056 2.8 1,467 1,589
MOVIe Theater 12 (6) 22 Scr. 3,373 153.3 160 7.3 61 99
Retail 16 820 30,000 GLA 3,143 104.8 284 9.5 136 148
M :.g Campus - Retail 17 820 10,000 GLA 1,551 155.1 137 13.7 66 71
M 1:.g Campus - Medical Office 27 720 40,139 GFA 1.426 35.5 131 3.3 35 96
M I Campus - Medical Ottice Tl 720 34,861 GFA 1.211 34,7 115 3.3 31 84
M l:.g Campus - Diagnostic Center 27 (4) 12,000 GFA 377 313 62 5.2 25 37
Medical Campus - Walk-In C!ilJjc 27 (2) 5.981 GFA 188 3l.S 52 8.7 16 36
Medical Campus - Ambulatory Surgery Center 27 (4) 12,000 GFA 377 3l.S 62 5.2 25 37
Hi2h Turnover Res1aur8nt 35 832 7,000 GFA 912 130.3 76 10.)1 46 30
High Turnover Restaurant 35 832 5,600 GFA 730 130.3 61 10~9 36 24
High Turnover Restaurant 35 832 3,200 GFA 417 130.3 35 10.9 21 14
Quality Restaurant 35 831 7,000 GFA 630 90.0 52 7.5 35 17
Quality Restaurant 35 831 6,400 GFA 570 90.0 48 7.5 32 16
Quality Restaurant 35 831 7.300 GFA 657 90.0 55 7.5 37 18
Retai1 35 820 13,500 GLA 1,881 139.3 167 12.4 80 87
PROPOSED (phase 3)
Retai1 13 820 180.000 GLA 9,947 55.3 926 5.1 444 481
HighTumover t 13 832 10,000 GFA 1,303 130.3 109 10.9 65 43
HiRb Twnover. Restaurant 13 832 10,000 GFA 1,303 130.3 109 10.9 65 43
Re1Bil 14 820 160,000 GLA 9.222 57.6 gS-6 5.4 411 445
Medical Campus - Medical Ottice 15 720 59.000 GFA 2,198 3T.2 187 3.2 51 137
Medical Campus - Hospital 27 610 120 Beds 2,604 21.7 146 1.2 50 97
otficelShowroom 34 (5) 60.000 GLA 861 14.4 13-g 2.3 26 112
Single enlial 36 210 4 DU -54 13.4 6 1.5 4 2
Total 100,217 9,032 4,243 4,789
lure 7,496 4ft 244 244
TJ'II1SIt 500 100 50 50
Pass-By ~ 458 229 229
Net External 7986 3.720 4.266
GFA - gross floor ca
GLA - gross leasable .....
(I) Trip gcnenJion forlhe PM peak-hour far Chills, FlIZIl1is, St.eak-n-Shake,Target with Garden Center md the We1lness Center is eslimaled based on
surveys conducted at the Oviedo Mmtdplace during June 1998. Dai1y!rip gcnenJion is based on ITE 1'IIUs.
(2) Trip gcnenJion far lhe PM peak-hour for Bordt:rs Boob. JlRd JeweJenand the Walk-In Clinic is estimated based on surveys conducted at lhe Oviedo Mmtdplace during
ApriJ 1999. Dai1y!rip gcnenJion is based on ITE 1'IIUs.
(3) Trip gcnenJiOll for lhe FlIIlIn1 Home WlIS &UUlIU:d to be 'Va)' similar to a church. therefore. lhe ITE !rip generation rates
for a cIwn:h were used.
(4) Trip generation for the Diagnostic Center, UJsmt Care Center and AmbuJatmy SIll'gCl)' Center was estimated using lhe clinic I1lte (Walk-In Clinic PM rate based on ~).
(5) OfliceIShawroom was calculaled 1l3O% office and 7O"/t showroom
(6) Trip gcnenJion forlheMovie TheIla-(IOO,OOOsquare feet) is based on surveys conduded duringJuJy 1998 and is based on 22 saecns.
SaIDu: 1TE Trip GcnmmDlf RqJOrt. SilcIh Editiall, J 997
Glatting Jadatm KRdur Anglin Lqpn RiMharl. Jnc.
~
Page 26
Table 5-1
Rnbed
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT NEEDS, YEAR 2005
ROADWAY SEGMENTS
OvIedo MarketpIaee
October 11 1999 .
r-
Oviedo
Septeat Projected Improved Marketplace S.... SigJ
Roadway From - To LOS Imnrovement LOS SI....lf1ranee Adv. Adv.
Scmoran Boulevard (SR 436 SRSO - UDivalitv Blvd. C None N1A 0.39"A. NO NO NO
UDivenitv Blvd. - Aloma Ave. D None N/A 0.78"A. NO NO NO
Aloma Ave. - H~ll Branch Rd. C None N1A 0.97% NO NO NO
Howell Branch Rei. - Lakemont Ave. F Create 8-iaDc caDBCil C 1.17".4 NO YES NO
Lakemont Ave. - Red BUll Lake Rd. F Create 12-1ane cauaci W D 1.31% NO YES NO
Red Bill! Lake Rei. - US 17-'>>. F Create 12-1aDe --.;mw,i IV C 1.42".4 NO YES NO
US 17-92 - CR 427 F Create 100iaDc_i w B 1.18% NO YES NO
Goldearod Road (SR ssff SR SO - Univenitv Blvd. D None N1A 0.71% NO NO NO
UDivcnitv Blvd. - Aloma Ave. E None N1A 0.99% NO NO NO
Dodd Road Howell Branch Rei. - Dike Rd. B None N1A 1.23% NO NO NO
Dike Rd. . Red BUll Lake Rd. B None N/A 1.23% NO NO NO
Tuskawilla Road Aloma Ave. . Dike Rd. D None N1A 296% NO NO NO
Dike Rei. . Red BUll Lake Rd. C None N1A 3.19"A. NO NO NO
Red BUll Lake Rd. - Lake Dr. D None N1A 4.79"A. NO NO NO
Lake Dr. - Wmt.er Springs Blvd. E None N1A 296% NO NO NO
Wmt.er SDrinIlS Blvd. - SR 434 C None N/A 0.99% NO NO NO
GreeneWav SR SO - Uoivcnitv Blvd. C None N1A 232"A. NO NO NO
Univcnitv Blvd. - Aloma Ave. C None N1A 3.48% NO NO NO
Aloma Ave. - Red BU2Lake Rd. B None N/A 3.6S% NO NO NO
Red Bill! Lake Rd. - SR 434 B None N1A 262"A. NO NO NO
SR 434 - Lake Marv Blvd. C None N/A 242"A. NO NO NO
Dean Road SRSO- Blvd. C None N/A 214% NO NO NO
Univenitv Blvd. - McCulloch Rd. D None N/A 3.17% NO NO NO
McCulloch Rei. - Aloma Avenue E None N1A 5.42"/0 YES NO NO
Rouse Rd. SR SO - Blvd. F Widen to four IaIles D 0.00% NO YES NO
SR 434 SRSO- Blvd. C None N1A 234% NO NO NO
Univcnitv Blvd. - Blvd. D None N/A 3.70% NO NO NO
Blvd. - McCulloch Rd. D None N1A 3.70% NO NO NO
McCulloch Rd. ."~- Rd. C None N/A 5.07% YES NO NO
Rei. - Alafava Woods Blvd. B None N/A S.60% YES NO NO
AW8W Woods Blvd. - Mitchell Hammock Rd. C None N/A S.95% YES NO NO
Mitchell Hammock Rei. - Aloma Ave. F Widen to four IaIles B 0.00% NO YES NO
Aloma Ave. . GreeneWav F Widen to four 1aIIcs B 0.62% NO YES NO
GreeneWav. Tuskawilla Rd. C None N/A O.S9"A. NO NO NO
Tuskawil1a Rei. - SR 419 E None N/A 1.06% NO NO NO
SR419 - US 17.92 D None N/A O.S9"A. NO NO NO
US 17-92 . CR 427 D None N/A 0.17"A. NO NO NO
Lockwood Road McCulloch Rd. - Seminole Creek Dr. B None N1A 1.47"/0 NO NO NO
Seminole Creek Dr. - LiuJe Econ River B None N1A 3.22"A. NO NO NO
Little Econ River . Mitchell Hammock Rd. B None N1A 3.22% NO NO NO
Mitchell Hammock Rd. . SR 419 C None N1A 1.07% NO NO NO
SR419-CR426 A None N/A 0.39% NO NO NO
McCulloch Road SR 434 - Lockwood Rei. B None N/A 0.60% NO NO NO
UmVemtv Boulevard SR 436 . GoldeDrod Rd. F Create 10-1aoe Q8DlICitv D 0.39"A. NO YES NO
GoldeDrod Rd. - Econ Tr. F Create 10-1aDe Q8DlICitv C O.S8"A. NO YES NO
Econ Tr. - Grec:DeWav F Create 10-1auec;m;aciiv C 0.58",4, NO YES NO
Grec:DeWav - Dean Rei. F Create 10-iaDc Q8DlICitv D 1.42"A. NO YES NO
Dean Rd. - Rouse Rd. F Create 10-1aDe C8DllCitv D 0.97% NO YES NO
Rouse Rei. - Alafava Tr. D None D 0.78"/0 NO NO NO
.
r
s_ Gl4rllbwJ...... ~AtrgIbtLopc ~ *-
.
r::
Page 1:1
Table ~1 (CoatiDued)
Rnised
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT NEEDS, YEAR 2005
ROADWAY SEGMENTS
OvIedo Marketplaee
,...
October 11 1999
OvIedo
Sqmeat Projected Improved Marlletplaee SIgJ
Roadwav From - To LOS Imltrovnnent LOS Si....mClUlftO Sil!o Adv. Adv.
A10ma Ave. (SR 426) US 17.92 - Lakcmont Ave. F Widen to six i8IICS C 0.88% NO YES NO
Lakcmont Ave. - SR 436 F Widen to six IlIIICS C 0.88"A. NO YES NO
SR 436 . Goldenrod Rd. F Widen to six lanes C 1.17% NO YES NO
Goldenrod Rd. . Howell BI'lIIICh Rd. C None N/A 293% NO NO NO
Howell Bnmch Rd. - TU8kawi\la Rd. D None N/A 219% NO NO NO
Tuskawilla Rd. - GrecocWav D None N/A 0.530/. NO NO NO
GrceneWav - Dean Rd. C None N/A 0.44% NO NO NO
Dean Rd. - Rd. C None N/A 3.06% NO NO NO
Rd. . Slavia Rd. C None N/A 4.37% NO NO NO
S1avia Rd. - Mitchell Hammock Rd. C None N/A 4.81% NO NO NO
Mitchell Hammock Rd. . Oviedo Marlcctzllacc Blv B. None N/A 1231% YES NO NO
Oviedo Marlcctzllacc Blvd. - Wmter Snrin"" Blvd. B. None N/A 10.32% YES NO NO
W. Broadwav SL (SR 426) Wmter Smullls Blvd. - Lake 1_ Dr. B. None N/A 11.22% YES NO NO
Lake 1_ Dr. - SR 434 C. None N/A 5.99% YES NO NO
Geneva Dr. (CR 426) CR 419 - Lockwood Rd. A None N/A 3.29% NO NO NO
Lockwood Rd. . ScmiDole Woods Blvd. D None N/A 263% NO NO NO
Horatio AVCI1UC US 17-92 - ThiItle 1A F Widen to six illllCS C 0.59% NO YES NO
Howell Bnmch ThiItle Ln. - Lake Howell Rd. C None N/A 0.59% NO NO NO
Lake Howell Rd. - SR 436 F Widcu to six lanes C 0.59% NO YES NO
SR 436 . Dike ReI. . C None N/A 0.49% NO NO NO
Dike Rd. . Dodd Rd. B None N/A 0.49% NO NO NO
Dodd Rd. . A10ma Ave. B None N/A 0.49% NO NO NO
Dike Road Howell Branch Rd. . Dodd Rd B None N/A 1.08"A. NO NO NO
Dodd Rd. - Tuskawilla Rd. A None N/A 1.32% NO NO NO
S\avia Road Red BUll Lake Rd. - Alama Ave. E None N/A 1.98"A. NO NO NO
Red BUll Lake Road SR 436 - Wmter Park Rd. E None NJA 263% NO NO NO
Wmtcr Park Rd. - Eaale Circle E None N/A 3.61% NO NO NO
I Ea2le Circle. Nodding Pines Wav C. None N/A 6.41% YES NO NO
Noddinll Pines Way - Dodd ReI. C. None N/A 7.64% YES NO NO
Dodd Rd. - Tuskawilla ReI. C. None N/A 8.86% YES NO NO
Tuakawilla Rd. - SlID Dr. E None N/A 11.66% YES NO NO
SlID Dr. . Citrus Rd. E None N/A 11.83% YES NO NO
Citrus Rd. - S1avia Rd. E Noac NJA 1232% YES NO NO
S1avia ReI. - Site Entnmoc (soulh) E None N/A 1248% YES NO NO.
Site Entnmcc (1IOUth) - Dovera ReI. E None NJA 1248% YES NO NO
Dovera ReI. - Oviedo Markclll1acc Blvd. D None N/A 10.17% YES NO NO
Oviedo Marlcctzllacc Blvd.. TlIJ'lI1:t Entnmcc D None NJA 10.17% YES NO NO
farm Entnmcc - GrcencWay D None N/A 15.56% YES NO NO
GrecDeWav. Alama Ave. E None N/A 11.17",4, YES NO NO
Mitchell Hammock Road Alama Ave. - SR 434 C. None N/A 18.15% YES NO NO
SR 434 - Lockwood ReI. C None N1A 6.05% YES NO NO
ReI. SR 426 - SR 434 B None NJA 2.14% NO NO NO
Seminola Boulevard US 17-92 - Lake Dr. C None N/A 1.48% NO NO NO
Scmiuola Blvd. - Tuskawilla Rd. B None N/A 1.97% NO NO NO
Mitchell Hammock Road Alama Ave. . SR 434 E None N/A. 0.66% NO NO NO
SR 434 - Lockwood Rd. B None N/A 1.07"A. NO NO NO
Rd. SR 426 . SR 434 C None N/A 5.22% YES NO NO
Seminola Boulevard US 17.92 - Lake Dr. D None N/A 8.66% YES NO NO
ScmiDola Blvd. - Tlllkawilla Rd. D None N/A 3.05% NO NO NO
CR419 SR 434 - Lockwood Rd. C None N/A 4.99% NO NO NO
..
l
· . based 011 ART-PLAN
Sorce: G/attbrg Jttd=tt ~ bglbl Lope RbwJuzn. It1C.
.
D
\ 0 kz..; lVJt ,"tWC- il.
(p
. t
~
r
.,,,,,,,,
1-1-1-
.........
..1,1,I"-
;:::
: lIft III
100
..,00
-N
-No:!'
ro:!'o:!'
.--
4~c:.
,,4C"C"
~!
.~
Cl
.
.
~
t?ed~
~~
tk\~
lAke-~
\Nte~c?~c.noN ~ i
INm:.~.....c.n~ ~ 2-
'::\
~~
~ 'i ~ L tl'?l (l~)
_ R ~ ~
~ ~ L .r- I\~'l <l~)
J.jtr
~ ~()'
.0 '>oj
'Z&le). ~ ;- ~
, ~
.~~
...........-
D () ~
'-' 'i 0
g - ~
JtL
L ~ (10\)
~ \')IB ((i;,2A)
;-- ''lC(O]
1""70(e) ~ 1 t r
"'c:r~~ :a
o'O'~
ZZc(o)~ ~ ~ ~
:tedd ~
\ ~ ree.~~c,:noN *' 3
\~ n=;~C;~c:nON ~ t4-
'"' """I
~ 0' ~ t
ii) ...., .v I - eq (2-0)
r- !; l1\ I
J- I '-.9L1" ~ 1-2-ro(i*~~)
-t r- I,{e)
iir
---
~.$ e
~ ~ t;
~
.....~~
,e-eN
~ ti:J 'Q
~ c< R
r' Il\ t'f\
Jil
L 370 (~)
-'I-- I uPi (71rE>)
r SIll> (3?2.)
3ZS{o) ~
2.1?5 (l1.Si) ~
~-z.( c) --""1
41&(t,) -1' 1 1 r
\':6~~~ N
~"""'i'O
Zll(C)~ ~ ~ 2
~r-V
-r~'\A.. ~
I~ ~~Ct1 ON ~ 5
\~w~cno~
'"' ~
~-=>~
" '>oj N
~ - :r
- -
t..- 2A '2. (fDl)
~ ~''> (1~6;z.)
.r-
, 1 r
JtL
j!l
2u~ (0) --1
2.lijQ (IZlP&j ~
J"
Ciw~ ~
$w.. pr
~(p
1- .
~~
iAlu~d
1
i
I
l
;
,
I
I
I
!
i
I
!
i
~~i
~ I20l !
I
!
j
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~ \1ctB (i?I?)
r- fD(D(u.) ~~1
~~
\l-.l~\eC.OCi..1 wtz.~tW<=t \-10J5
I "
" ." VDUi.t'-1G-?
\"
~ (I~:z.\~---1 1 i r
3oc:>(0) --+ D' ~
~ '" .,:,
~ .....
$ C"
~\Ab,D\. ~
~~\JD 't
'l()(X (>C>') ~
L--=. fr:ro$Cr F\-I l"'9At.. \.l0lJG!. IlMffi'-
. Tc\M... P\J\ p~~ - ~o VI. .,... ~PIC..
~ 'J,oo?
r
I
""" '"
~~::
_ ....,.w
- ....:&:
.; '^ III
000
11\00
-C'4
. C'4~.
r.,.,
.--
r.~t=.
C'4C'4C'4
~
~
l?at0utt
~~
(?at~
\Afe.(2d
0ait3wt
~~c:\
\t:/I1-/4A \M<<U..
\Nte~<;;~c.n6N :f\:::f
- ~
~ ....
:s _ ~
...J 10 v L
~ 'WI ~ '7,~1 (t.=!o\)
-S (l) or> +-
I I L \?'\ "1&)
<:- ~ V- (De. (lee.)
4Up(4U)J i l' r
\b2b(ee4)~ ~ _ '""'
'Z."'7(Uh~ 6 e !
.~ \0 (S"'
:: Qj
IN~~~n()\..\ ~ e
~
?"'''
_ oolr ~
~ !.of) .....,
'(;-.Jt..I
~ ~ ~
Jtl
L 37~ ("7&)
<- \~ (4Otl)
r- 340 (~)
417 (477)--1. 11 r
I?,O (Ii:fh~ ,......... ~
~ N .
. W7 ('C>7)~ ~...9 ~
..;, -9 'o"J V
tn ~ ....
\9 ((\
"OJ
.~~
(N"tdo H~~
\"-i ~~c.i)oN ~ \0
\ "-l ree.~~c."oN *' 9
~
c.1-
~
J t ~ ;= \7"->(\075)
--1'11r
'eIOo(\\U} -4
~(~)~
~~r
. It-
J t L.l ;=1Sl1 (qt';~.J
*e.(~)~ i j- r
\W.~ (\Ip'2.2.~ 'f
~i
G,ruu.W~ew*
I~ ~.:s~cn ON ~ \\
f$! \
~ l ~ L- ~e, (~''i)
1 f L ~ \C:lO(p (~)
~ ~ -r- z.?4 (oj
e:e+ (~2.) --1 i 1 r
"oc..(~) ~ """..s ~
~ r- e
4o(p u",)---T ..;.J V !l
~ ~ l;j ~
'-l t:'I
\~~~c:no~ ~ l z... .
...... .
~.......-
\b, .s, D I '" .
~ .() ~ .L-- \B(o)
~, T \" ~~'?l>(o)
c- ~ ,41 r- ?4(O)
(#\2- ("E!>).--1 11- r
'\2(0) --+ \_
.. - 0
~ (:UO) ~ ~ ~ t
~ ~
~e4~
\\..l~lN T~~ftJ<"::t K
I
VOU).~G.~
~~(p
~~~D',
'l(')(X (,c)() ~
L p,.".mocr ~ !"9A\(..\.l0C)lZ. IIMffI/:..
Toil't\.... PtJ\ P~\L" ~O U~ .,... (l.'r-~PIC..
~ ~OO?
t
\-4
I
! ~(p
j
I
I.
I
I
I
~~
~1
I
I
j
I
I
i
i
~~!.
~~.
I
. !
i
~\~
~
\Ui
\
.
.F,o
I
.
r
\Nfeti<:;~CnoN ~ l~
-I
!~~ L:;!..(o)
,... -...J
~-~ +- 1 (0 )
."",,,, ) ~L v- i (b)
r:"i ~ :: Di\(.e
: .w.aw ~ #1'%)---1' '11 r
-- ::%
...."''''
coo
",cc I(o)~ ~ _ ~
-('4 o -
.. ('4 ~ 2-~~ (0) ---:i, '0 ~ t:r
t~. ~ H
---
Nc-4~
('4('4('4
~ \~l,,~
\\I.lree.~~c.1"\ON *' ,~
'0'-
'O.ce L \i#e (0)
;;:' ;; ~
\(\ ..g 9: ..- fD~ (0)
. Jtl
~kK' r 2A~(e,(p)
~~ 2.S(c) --1 11 r
e.\'I d z.h(o) ~
- -
e5(~z.) ~ ~~ e
'"',... l
.0 -
:: r-
\tAb~\lo.. ~
I~~s~cn~ :t!r:i-:r
~J!
l t.- \f>'2. (~)
~ t ~
jIL ~ 2.(c)
Al~tt. r-34-0(0).
~~\vd 3 (0) .-:....1 i tr
I (0) ~ ~i""
~. ()
&(0) ~ -.:;, ....
!! :9
~.~
Sje. .f34.
lO/I7-Ia.t.t \M~
IN~~~t1~ ~ \4-
"'"'
--S
S~ L
~ ~
JIl:=
~S(o) ---1 1 t r
--? -
- ~,
1?I?1(~\) ~ ~ ~
~*
T~\Id1I~ ~
\~ ~S~c.noN ~ ((p
-
~ \[I
~ -
.oj ~ 0' t
.s ~ ~ -~(o)
J;5 T ~Ll <:-- 41 (0)
-t r- 'Z. 7(0)
337 (tn) ---1
GA(o) ~
9Se(~) -"j,
,tr
-
~ == ()
e ~ ...,
~ r- ~
~ ~
q,y.. A?1A-
\\..l~~no~ ~ \6
t
~
I .
\ ~(o
j
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
l
~
'Dr-
I
I
I
. I
!
1
i
I
I
j
I
i
I
~A4L. i
~ !
I
-j
...... ....
~ J \
II 1- \~~(O)
, I \ I ~q~'i (1'llt)
~ ~ 4 r- 2.10(0)
lir
:t ...... '0
~ t~
~ ~ ~
~~
\~TU4~C).1 W~~lWC:t. kor~~ ,
~, .. VOUJ.t'--16-~
\14- (0) .-1.
I z.ll (*3)--+
"'12. (c) ~
.
~~tJO "
')(,cX (,c)() ~
L-=. Przo.llUr 1'\.-\ 17lAAl<..llctJ\Z. 111'1<1"1'\'-
TOThL.. ~ P~\L -\401)1.. ,.. ~PlC...
~ 'Z-OO?
+,\, \d..All
4\o.IlA~
~
t::
r
."",,,,
~-~~
. \1....11I
.......
- ~=%
01)"'11I
00.0
11\00
_M
,- M~
ct~~
---
r.~e:.
MMM
~
~
+z.v
S\'-
~4-
lo/rz..Jtit"l. IMQ.~ %
I
I
'.
I
. i
I
I
I
t
~
\Nfe~C;;~c.noN ~ \'\
-I N re::.rz..:;.~ nCA-4 ~ 'ZoO
~7)'-
M-.;.I~ L
'iJ\i\
iJ ~ 0 1.D(0)
Eo, I f ~ 400 o~\)
~ ~ ~ r ~(o)
\~ ('2-0) --1' i t r
G;,77 elM) ~ - - 0-
.e 0 "
&:;0 (0) --, tf\ ~ I'
'i' ~ S
L..,~(o)
J ~ I... ;= 77& C=J
~
~
"'~C"')::: 1 i r
4&(0} -"l- ~ ~
'J::! C5'"
""f'
st7- 4~
Grr~vJl>>f ~\-
\ \-.l re:eh~C.:T'\ON *' 2.\
\"-l ~~c.i\oN ~ z.2-
0' 0' '"
"o,j 'd I--
t ~
. J I I tIr-\,s;,,,, (40)
v 4 rAo(E:.)
-111r
841 C~) ~
'Z.~(\e.)~
~ ~ ~l L \e. ( -
.$l ~ ~ ~ 0)
JILl. ~q"Z? (~)
~ r-~(o]
4Z(o) --1 1 i r
I~\l Cll ) ~ ~ e ~
1&2 (;0)--"1. ~ ~ ~
~~12-cl
92
~
Gir~r>>yW~
l\..\~.:s~GT\ON fr: za.
_ i' \ .
~ ~ t..-
~ ~ ~(~lJ
j t l ;: ~o (~)
?w(o) --1 i 1 r
\~O(o) ~
--:t
ge.
4-?4-
\~re;~cno~ ~ fA-
~ .
~ 0' - ..
'i1 ~ ~ 11- eh?(O)
J~ I '\ 1 ~ SBG.oCAoJ
~ 41,r-I(.o)
'5+~ (\4t)----1 i i r
\ZSC~ (~) --+ __ _ __
o Q e
\ (0) ~ :: ~ N
...,..~ \l~ ~
\\.l~~Q..l T~~l\JG:t K0/5 -- \
I .
" .. VoU)_~G-?
~Ai~
~~~D'.
'l( '" X (,,)() -;r
L &.ecr 1'1-I J7li'A\(..IlIJl}lZ.I-MffI'- .
ToTh-\.- ~ P~~\l.-~OIJ2. -r~Prc..
~ 1,00;:'
1
I
I
I
t
I
I
i
!
i
!
!.
I
!
j
~
4'Zco
t::
.
r
-,.,.."
r;, t:l:
: ,."'...
. ';::::
..,"''''
000
"'00
-C'4
. C'4 ~
t ~..,
---
N~~
C'4C'4C'4
;f\
~
.
:-
i..
r.
.
r
L
lO'Iz./~ \U~
i
. I
!~
IN~~~n~ ~ Z.v
\N-retZ.c:;~cn6N ~ 1.-5
1
'd L
I.!! ~ \(,:>'10 (40)
~ ~ L ,rSo(o)
J~ i l' r
\?, S (':!h)~
~
S!42.<P
Z7(P(0) ~
\444 (~)-l)
~
G:t~~ W~\-
L
0'
'OJ
~
~~y e.-t~t
\~ ~~~~C:nON ~ 2.8
-;""
~ g It
e #tC\ I - -4'\8 (lO",)
r- .;,g Jl; . ~ l (0)
J ~ LI r- U7(0)
4(o} ---:1 I i - r
7(0) ~ ........
'0 r:- D
~(O)~ ~~ ~
~ ....
(!"
\ \-.l ree.~~c.:r\ON *' 1..7.
L S(o)
..- ib7(40)
r 3l7(~C':Z.)
l'(e>) --1 11 r
'\4- ~ (~) ~ _ '7l' ":i'
D.;:) ,..
'-J -
(P73 (0 j -, ~- '" ~
~ :i\
0'......-
.., D 0
~~::::'
JtL,
~
4'4-
t:>eAM ~
\",li~~no~ ~.30
--j.
.g, -.J_.... .
? ~ ~ ~l?(O)
J- i \' ~l~{bl
-\, 4 r- S&(o)
z..q (0) _---1 1 t r
IO(t'1 --+ .11\ -
i 2 ~
48i(Z302)~ ,,~,..
~~
~4'Z.(p
\\..l1U4~C).1 T~\'J!W~ \-1
I
" -. VOUJ.1'--16.~
I~ ~S~C" ON ~ 2q
~i
~ ~
JIL;=
011~
~~
l?8(~r--1'
~
4<.c(~)~
L-
1\r
i-
_ r-
~ ~
~~
~~~O'.
x:)(X (,c.>,) ~
L-.:. f701oJU:r 1M PtAA"--l.\C()IZ. l'e.I<fflt:..
TCTh\... P\-'\ P~~\L-~OUL \AAf"PIC..
<;e:. 4z,(p
~ 'J,OO?
t
~
~
42.~
,
.
I
I
i
I
1
!
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
(!M~
~ '
I
!
I
W~
~"'f'7 .
e;." d
\""
c
r
.,,"''''
".-......
. ........ WI
- .. III ...
- ..-:
.nu;cn
000
onoo
-C'4
-l"4"
.,,,,,
---
~~c:.
Nl"4C'4
~
~
Ici.~ I ot'\ MO\.""'-
\Nte~c;;~c.n6N ~ ~\
1}..1 m:.tz.c:;.~ n~ ~?~
~
4~
~_......
,,S)o 0 L
-'JV
'Xl 11' .9 172-(b)
.!:! ~ r- ~
I I I S4? 04\)
<:-' ~ ~ ~ 1\(0)
u4 ("1\) --1' - i l' r
~(I(P\J~ -:::- - 0
~~-
10\ (,.)--' ~,... ~
'I' r- c:r "
~~~,
V 'oJ ~ L 44(0)
t ~ ~ ~ Z-1'\(o)
J t l r- ~,(?3)
4\(20) .--1
~IS(o) ~
~(o)J.
1ir
~.'"' ~
o 0 ~
-v"-'
~~~
~ r-
~~A,,~
~od V;lvcl
\ \-.l ree..;.~c..'T10N *
\"-l ~s.~':noN ~
\L
I
J t LI;=
-11ir
~
L
J~L;=
~\11 r
--"l.
l~ ~7~C:n ON ;;:
\\..1~~c.:no~ ~
Jtd;=
~ i 1 r
~
~
\1-
j t Ll;:
-= 1 i r
~
t
~
~
i
t
! (,/
l '(P
I
I
!.
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I.
I
!
I
i
I
,
t
I
I
,
I
i
!
I
i
\
I.
I
!
i
\\J.~~~ T~l'JtWC:) Hor~
I VOUJ,t--1G.~
L:e~\JD JJ
'l( ')( X ()()C.) ?"'
~ \11o.llUr FYI rlM\:.'l.\C\iIZ- \~'l"A'-
TOTh-\... ~ P~\L"'~OUL ""'~p~
~ 'J,oo'?
r :
,..
. \
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
II. Natuml Resources. The air quality condition set forth in paragrnph 4 (a) of the
Original Development Order is hereby incorporated by reference in totality
provided that the reference to the ADA shall be deemed to refer to the information,
data, plans and commitments contained in the documents referenced in Section II
paragrnph three (3) of this Development Order.
12. Transoortation: Proiect Phasin~. For the purpose of the transportation conditions,
the total Oviedo Marketplace DR! shall be divided into and limited to the
following phases, based upon peak hour trip ends or total average daily trip ends
(based upon the current I1E Trip Generation manual), whichever comes first
Total Total
Gross Peak Total Gross Gross
Hour Trip Cumulative . Daily Total and Gross
Phase Ends Peak Hour Trip Ends Cumulative Daily
00:!!l Per Phase Trio Ends Per Phase Trio Ends
la & Ib 1,990 1,990 28,908 28,908'
(existing &
approved)
2 4,282 6,272 45,616 74,5242
(2002)
(includes mall)
3a 1,230 7,502 13,444 87,968
3b 1,229 8,731 13,443 101,4113
(2005)
l. The estimated net external daily trip ends for Phase. I is 25,761
2. The estimated net external daily trip ends for Phase 2 is 42,501
or 68,262 cumulatively for Phases 1 and 2.
3. The estimated net external daily trip ends for Phase 3 is 26,798
or 95,060 cumulatively.
QI-7
".'1
n
~..,
STATUS
Development is proceeding in compliance with this condition.
Development is proceeding in compliance with this condition.
r .
;.
, 1
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
13.
Transoortation: Monitorin2 and Modelin2.
a. Prior to the initiation of Phase 3a and 3b, the Developer shall conduct a
monitoring/modeling program. Said program shall ascertain the level of
service ("LOS") on facilities where the combined traffic from the Oviedo
Marketplace Project is estimated to contribute an amount of traffic greater
than or equal to five percent (5%) of the adopted LOS roadway service
volume. The methodology of the monitorlDg/modeling program shall be
agreed upon by the ECFRPC, the City of Oviedo (government of
jurisdiction), Seminole County (government of jurisdiction), City of Winter
Springs, Orange County, the Florida Department of Transportation
("FOOT'), the DCA and the Developer, with LYNX being included in an
advisol)' role only. All studies and monitoring/modeling programs shall be
consistent with the then current ECFRPC rules, procedures and criteria.
The depth of each monitoring and modeling effort shall be similar to that
required within a DR! Application for Development Approval but shall be
compatible with the requirements of Seminole County's or the City of
Oviedo's Concurrency Management System as it relates to facilities within
the applicable local government of jurisdiction. In the event that all parties
cannot come to agreement on the methodology, the ECFRPC and the
applicable local government of jurisdiction shall be the fmal arbiters, with
the applicable local government's decision being fmal as it relates to its
facilities (i.e., facilities located within the limits of Seminole County or the
City of Oviedo, as the case may be) and the ECFRPC's decision being fmal
as it relates to aU other facilities.
b.
The following list of facilities indicates those roadways within the study
area which were analyzed for full buildout of the Oviedo Marketplace
Project. The facilities to be monitored/modeled for Phase 3 may include,
but shall not be limited to, those segments of the regional roadways within
the following list and one segment beyond where the Oviedo Marketplace
Project is estimated to contribute a cumulative amount of traffic greater than
or equal to five percent (5%) of the adopted LOS service volume, based on
the modeling of the buildout of the Project. The LOS standard and service
volumes shall be in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan for the
applicable jurisdiction where the roadway segment is located. The LOS
standard and service volumes for roads on the Florida Intrastate Highway
System will be in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations. The
analyzed facilities will include signalized intersections and segment
analyses of collector and higher classified roadways and interchange ramps.
.
Gl-8
.
.. "
...,
n
STATUS
A traffic monitoring/modeling study is underway. Results of the study will be
submitted to the appropriate agencies in August 1999.
.
r :
. 1
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
, 1
, "
[t
."
STATUS
The ECFRPC, FOOT, Seminole County, City of Oviedo, City of Winter
Springs, Orange County and LYNX shall have the right to make reasonable
requests for additional infonnation from the Developer to verify adherence
to these provisions. The Developer shall supply adequate information
toward compliance with these requirements.
Candidate Roadwavs for Monitoring/Modelin~ Study
Horatio Avenue
US 17-92 to Thistle Lane
Aloma Avenue (SR 426)
Howell Branch Road
US 17-92 to Lakemont Avenue
Lakemont Avenue to SR 436
SR 436 to Goldenrod Road (SR 551)
Goldenrod Road (SR 551) to Howell Branch Road
Howell Branch Road to Tuskawilla Road
Tuskawilla Road to GreeneWay
GreeneWay to Dean Road
Dean Road to Chapman Road
Chapman Road to Slavia Road
Slavia Road to Mitchell Hammock Road
Mitchell Hammock Road to Winter Springs Boulevard
West Broadway Street (SR 426)
Winter Springs Boulevard to Lake Jessup Drive
Lake Jessup Drive to SR 434
Nodding Pines Way to Dodd Road
Geneva Drive (CR 426)
CR 419 to Lockwood Road
Lockwood Road to Seminola Woods Road
Slavia Road to Site Enttance (South)
Site Enttance (South) to Site Enttance (West)
Mitchell Hammock Road
Aloma Avenue (SR426) to SR 434
SR 434 to Lockwood Road
GI-9
,..
, 1
, "'
..,
,I.
r .
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL STATUS
Chapman Road
SR 426 to SR 434
Thistle Lane to Lake Howell Road
Lake Howell Road to SR 436
SR 436 to Dike Road
Dike Road to Dodd Road
Dodd Road to Aloma Avenue (SR 426)
Dike Road
Howell Branch Road to Dodd Road
Dodd Road to Tuskawilla Road
Slavia Road ,
Red Bug Lake Road to Aloma Avenue (SR 426)
Red Bug Lake Road
SR 436 to Eagle Circle
Eagle Circle to Nodding Pines Way
Dodd Road to Thskawilla Road
Tuskawilla Road to Slavia Road
Site Entrance (West) to Site Entrance (East)
Site Entrance (East) to the GreeneWay
GreeneWay to Aloma Avenue (SR 426)
Greeneway
SR SO to University Blvd.
University Boulevard to Aloma Avenue (SR 426)
Seminola Boulevard
US 17-92 to Lake Drive
Red Bug Lake Road to SR 434 .
Lake Drive
Seminola Blvd. to TuskaWiUa Road
.
01-10
.
.
I .
r"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
CR 419
SR 434 to Lockwood Road
Lockwood Road to Old Chuluota Road
McCulloch Road to Aloma Avenue (SR 426)
Semoran Boulevard (SR 436)
University Boulevard to Aloma Avenue (SR 426)
Aloma Avenue (SR 426) to Howell Branch Road
Howell Branch Road to Lakemont Avenue
Lakemont Avenue to Red Bug Lake Road
Red Bug Lake Road to Kawanee Trail
Kawanee Trail to Oxford Road
Oxford Road to US 17-92
McCulloch Road to Chapman Road
Goldenrod Road (SR 551)
SR 50 to University Boulevard
University Boulevard to Aloma Avenue (SR 426)
Dodd Road
Howell Branch Road to Dike Road
Dike Road to Red Bug Lake Road
Tuskawilla Road to CR 419
. Tuskawilla Road
Aloma Avenue (SR 426) to Dike Road
Dike Road to Red Bug Lake Road
Red Bug Lake Road to Lake Drive
Lake Drive to Winter Springs Boulevard
Lockwood Road
McCulloch Road to Seminole Creek Drive
Seminole Creek Drive to Little Econ River
Little Econ River to Mitchell Hammock Road
Rouse Road to Alafaya Trail (SR 434)
, 1
1'"
B
....,
STATUS
Gl-11
~.
, 1
.."
, .
...,
n
CONDfinONSOFAPPROVAL STATUS
Mitchell Hammock Road to CR 419
CR 419 to CR 426
McCulloch Road
SR 434 to Lockwood Road
Atoma Avenue (SR 426) to Red Bug Lake Road
SR 434 to Lake Mary Boulevard
Dean Road
SR 50 to University Boulevard
University Boulevard to McCulloch Road (SR 426) ,
Rouse Road
SR 50 to University Boulevard
SR 434
SR 50 to University Boulevard
University Boulevard to Corporate Boulevard
Corporate Boulevard to McCulloch Road .
Chapman Road to Atafaya Woods Blvd.
Atafaya Woods Blvd. to Mitchell Hammock Road
Mitchell Hammock Road to Atoma Avenue (SR 426)
Aloma Avenue (SR 426) to GreeneWay
GreeneWay to Tuskawilla Road
CR 419 to US 17-92
US 17-92 to CR 427
University Boulevard
SR 436 to Goldenrod Road (SR 551)
Goldenrod Road (SR 551) to Econlockhatchee Trail
Econlockhatchee Trail to GreeneWay
GreeneWay to Dean Road
.
Gl-12
.
.
I .
..
. 1
,..
. 1
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Dean Road to Rouse Road
Rouse Road to Alafaya Trail (SR 434)
In the event that a roadway widening is identified which is not compatible with
adopted policy of the FOOT or local government (for example, because it has been
designated as a constrained facility) the Developer, Seminole COWlty or the City of
Oviedo as the applicable local government of jurisdiction, the ECFRPC, the FOCA
and the party having either maintenance or jurisdictional responsibility for the
facility shall jointly detennine alternate mitigation solutions to provide for the
transportation needs. .
14. TranSDOrtation: MonitOrin2 and Modeling Results.
a.
The Project shall not commence beyond Phase 2 (an equivalent of 6272
total gross peak hour trip ends or 74,524 total gross daily trip ends) into
Phase 3a and 3b when service levels are below the minimum service level
adopted in the applicable local government's comprehensive plan for that
specific roadway during the peak hour and the Project contributes, or is
projected to contribute with the next phase of traffic, five percent (5%) or
greater of the adopted LOS service volume of the roadway or intersection as
detennined by the monitoring program required in the preceding condition,
unless mitigation measures and/or improvements are secured and
committed for completion during the phase or subphase in which impacts
occur.
.,
STATUS
,.,
t1
We are conducting the monitoring/modeling study required by this condition and the
report will be available in August 1999.
01-13
, I
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
b.
Prior to the commencement of Phase 3a or Phase 3b, this list of committed
roadway improvements must be identified. These improvements shall
occur by the required threshold in order for the Project to proceed through
the balance of the phase or subphase. If the Developer can demonstrate that
a portion of a phase or subphase does not adversely affect the regional
roadway network as determined by the monitoring and modeling tests
discussed above, then the Developer may proceed with that portion of the
phase (and only that portion). It is the intent of this condition to ensure that .
this Development Order is consistent with the provisions of Section
380.06(15)(e)(I) and 380.06(15)(e)(2), Florida Statutes, provided, however,
that it is not the intent of this provision or any other provision of this
Development Order to impose upon the CoUnty or the City of Oviedo any
obligation to fund or construct or to provide any public facilities to or for
the Developer upon which the Development may depend. Further, this
condition is intended to avoid the conflict of simultaneously applying the
differing standards of the aforesaid 5% (9J-2.045, FAC.) role and the
County's or the City of Oviedo's concurrency management systems.
Should the provisions of this Development Order give direction that
prevents compliance with Seminole County's or the City of Oviedo's
concurrency management regulations as amended, then the concurrency
regulations will govern in accordance with the applicable laws and
regulations.
c.
To aid in assessing the Project's potential for impacting facilities, DR!
Annual Reports shall include documentation that the applicable level of
setvice requirements are being met. Such documentation shall include
current roadway LOS (may be obtained from latest Concurrency
Management System data of Seminole County and/or the City of Oviedo),.
Project traffic contributed to the roadway facility (based on latest test
modeling/monitoring effort) and other appropriate infonnation.
.
.
.'1
...,
STATUS
The list of required roadway improvements will be identified as a result of the
monitoring/modeling study above. These results will be available August 1999.
Existing levels of setvice will be reported in the monitoringfmodeling study.
Gl-14
.
I '
I I
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
15, Transoortation Miti~ation: The following improvements are those either assumed
to be in place (because they are already funded) or are necessary as a result of the
projected total traffic volume and the Project contributes 5% or greater to the
adopted LOS service volume of the facility. The Phase 2 programmed
improvements must be complete and opemtional by the time the mall opens, as
assumed in the analysis, or (i) as otherwise specified below for items a through h
and (ii) in accordance with 9J-S.00SS(2)(c), FAC as it relates to items i through p.
Those not programmed shall be operational at the time or ADT level specified.
Phase 2 reQuirements (2002)
Intersections
a. SR 434 and Mitchell Hammock Road - Add an additional 300 foot left-turn
lane to provide dual left-turn lanes to SR 434 at the northbound'approach,
add a 2S0 foot right turn lane to Mitchell Hammock Road in the eastbound
direction. For the SR 434 southbound approach, either add a 400 foot right
turn lane, or constmct Division Street as a two lane collector road from
Geneva Road to Alexandria Boulevard, with signalization at Mitchell
Hammock Road and at E. Broadway Avenue intersections (assuming
warrants are met).
b. Red Bug Lake Road and SR 426 - Add an additional eastbound to
northbound left turn lane.
Roadwavs
a. Red Bug Lake Road must be widened to 6 lanes from Tuskawilla Road to
Project entrance (to existing 6 lane cross-section) prior to the time that
certificates of occupancy for the mall are issued.
b. Oviedo Crossing Terrace must be constructed from Red Bug Lake Road
through the Project site easterly across the GreeneWay via bridge to
intersect with SR 426 in the genemllocation as shown on Exhibit B prior to
the time that certificates of occupancy for the mall are issued.
Gl-IS
, .,
,.,
n
STATUS
Development is proceeding in compliance with this condition.
All of the improvements listed in Condition 15 for Phase 2 have been completed
except the widening of Tuskawilla Road from Red Bug Lake Road to Winter
Springs Boulevard and Seminola Boulevard from US 17-92 to Lake Drive. These
two projects (Tuskawilla Road and Seminola Boulevard) are under construction.
I .
r.
, 1
, :1
~1
n
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL STATUS
OtherlImprovements
a. A dual left-turn lane on the eastbound and northbound approaches must be
constructed at the intersection of Oviedo Crossing Terrace and State Road
426.
b. An additional left-turn on the northbound approach must be constructed at
the intersection of Winter Springs Boulevard and State Road 426.
c. A closed loop system must be installed along SR 426 from Chapman Road
to State Road 434.
d. A closed loop signal system for Red Bug Lake Road from SR 426 to Slavia
Road.
\
e. Tuskawilla Road must be widened to 4 lanes from Aloma Avenue to Winter
Springs Boulevard with a 6 lane section from Red Bug Lake Road to Dike
Road.
f. Aloma Avenue (SR 426) must be widened to 4 lanes from the Orange
County Line to the GreeneWay.
g. Howell Branch Road must be widened to 4 lanes from SR 436 to Aloma
Avenue (SR 426).
h. Goldenrod Road (SR 551) must be widened to 4 lanes from University
Boulevard to Aloma Avenue (SR 426).
i. Seminola Boulevard must be widened to 4 lanes from US 17-92 to Lake
Drive.
j. Dog Track Road must be widened to 4 lanes from US 17-92 to SR 427.
k. SR 434 (Alafaya Trail) must be widened to 4 lanes from University
Boulevard to McCulloch Road.
I. SR 434 must be widened to 4 lanes from Tuskawilla Road to CR 419.
Phase 3a reauirements (2005) The following improvements have been identified
as improvements which may be required for Phase 3 development impacts.
Monitoring and modeling prior to Phase 3 shall refine this list and idelltify the
threshold at which significant and adverse impacts occur.
.
G1-16
.
.
I .
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Intersections
a. Aloma Avenue (SR 426) and Howell Branch Road - add east and west
through lanes, and eastbound left-turn lane and a northbound right-turn
lane.
b. Alafaya Trail (SR 434) and Mitchell HammOCk Road - add eastbound,
northbound and southbound right-turn lanes and northbound and
southbound through lanes.
c. SR 436 and Red Bug Lake Road - grade separation.
d. Red Bug Lake Road and Dodd Road - add eastbound and westbound
through lanes.
e. Red Bug Lake Road and Tuskawilla Road - add eastbound and westbound
and northbound through lanes and a westbound right-turn lane.
f. Red Bug Lake Road and Slavia Road - add eastbound left-turn lane.
g. Red Bug Lake Road and the GreeneWay ramps east - add eastbound left-
turn lane.
h. Red Bug Lake Road and Aloma Avenue (SR 426) - add eastbound left and
through lane.
Roadways
a. Semoran Boulevard (SR 436) must be improved to a 6 lane freeway section
from Red Bug Lake Road to US 17-92.
b. Alafaya Trail (SR 434) must be improved to a 4 lane divided arterial from
Chapman Road to SR 426 (or alternative capacity increasing improvement
constructed).
c. Aloma Avenue must be widened to 6 lanes from Lakemont Avenue to
Howell Branch Road.
d. Aloma Avenue must be widened to 4 lanes from Mitchell Hammock Road
to Oviedo Crossing Boulevard (or alternative capacity increasing
improvement constructed).
e. SR 426 (West Broadway Street) must be widened to 4 lanes (or alternate
capacity increasing improvement constructed).
f. Mitchell Hammock Road must be widened to 6 lanes from Aloma Avenue
(SR 426) to Alafaya Trail (SR 434).
Gt-t7
I
""
[J
STATUS
I .
, 1
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
The necessity for construction of these facilities prior to the Project's generation of
the referenced number of trip ends or time frame shall be subject to the results of
monitoring and modeling studies conducted pursuant to the other tenns of this
Development Order. The burden of proof is upon the Developer to show that any
particular improvement listed above is not required or may be delayed. The final
decision rests with the FOOT on state facilities, Seminole. County on all county
roadways, the City of Oviedo for Oviedo roadways, arid the ECFRPC for all other
roadways. In the event a monitoring and modeling study detennines that different.
roadway improvements are required (including roadway segme.nt, type of
improvement and timing) other than those in the aforementioned list, this
Development Order shall be amended pursuant to the provisions of Subsection
380.06(19), Florida Statutes, to reflect the required revision.
16. Transportation: Committed ImDrovements.
a. The parties acknowledge that the local comprehensive plan is in compliance
with Chapter 163, Part II, F.S., and that the plan includes a transportation
concurrency management system that recognizes improvements scheduled
within the first three years of the capital improvements schedule (pursuant
to Rule 9J-5.0055(2)(c), F.AC.) and within the first three years of the
current FOOT improvement program. Therefore, for Phase 2, which has
undergone local concurrency review and for which adequate roadway
facilities are conditionally reserved those improvements identified in
Paragraphs 15(i) through 15(P) shall be counted as committed regardless of
whether said improvements are actually constructed.
b. Committed improvements may also include (i) a binding fmancially secured
and. irrevocable commitment by the Developer or other applicable persons
or entities for the design, engineering and actual construction of the
necessary improvements with the posting of a cash bond, surety bond,
irrevocable letter of credit or other security in a fonn satisfactory to
Seminole County or the City of Oviedo which requires constmction to
occur during the applicable phase and must be in accordance with the
requirements of applicable law, and must otherwise comply with the
requirements of the Seminole County or the City of Oviedo's
Comprehensive Plan. or (ii) any alternative agreed upon by Seminole
County or the City of Oviedo, the ECFRPC, the DCA an~ the Developer
and incorporated into the Development Order by amendment.
G1-18
.
.
" '1
n
~
STATUS
Development is proceeding in compliance with this condition.
.
, 1
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
17. TransDortation: FDOT Asrreement. In the event that the monitoring/modeling
results as set forth in Paragraphs 13 and 14 hereof show that improvements must
be made to state roads and if mitigation is not provided as set forth in Paragraphs
15 and 16, then prior to a construction of any portion of the subphases of Phase 3
and subject to the provisions of Florida Statutes, Section 380.06(lS)(e), the
Developer, Seminole COWlty or the City of Oviedo and the'FDOT shall enter into
an agreement which ensures that a proportionate share contribution is made to the
FDOT for Project impacts to State roads. The geographical limits of state roads .
subject to this condition shall be detennined by the FOOT but shall be restricted to
those roadway facilities which are operating adversely and the Project contributes
5% or greater to the adopted minimum LOS service volume. The calculations
shall consider impacts of the entire Project through Phase 3 buildout.
Detennination of the proportionate share payment shall use the following
proportionate share contribution fonnula:
DRI Trios
SV Increase x Cost
For this formula, DRI Trips is the cumulative number of the trips from the
development expected to reach the roadway during the peak hour from the
complete Phase 3 buildou~ SV Increase is the change in peak hour maximum
service volume of the roadway resulting from construction of the improvement
necessary to maintain the desired level of service; and Cost is the cost of
construction, at the time of Developer payment, of an improvement necessary to
maintain the desired level of service. Construction cost includes all improvement
associated costs, including engineering design, right-of-way acquisition, planning.
engineering. inspection, and other associated physical development costs directly
required and associated with the construction of the improvement, as detennined
by the government agency having maintenance authority over the roadway.
The Development Order shall be amended pursuant to Section 380.06(19), Florida
Statutes, to include this agreement and the Developer agrees to enter into such
agreement.
Gl-19
1
. 1
.
STATUS
This condition is not yet applicable.
1 .
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
The monitoring and modeling required after Phase 2 and prior to Phase 3a and 3b
shall be used to verify impacts from Phase 2 and to more accurately estimate
probable impacts from Phase 3. If necessary, the proportionate share contribution
will be adjusted to reflect actual impacts from prior phases and the more accurate
infonnation which will result from subsequent phase estimates. If it is verified the
roadway improvements listed above are still needed, then the Project shall not
proceed into Phase 3 until payment is made and said improvements are scheduled
for construction in the FOOT work program within the first three years from when
the impacts are estimated to be significant and adverse.
If the parties cannot reach agreement independently by that time, or if so desired
by the parties at any time prior to that, then the issues in dispute shall be resolved
through the ECFRPC's adopted Dispute Resolution Process or similar process.
The solutions recommended as a result of this process shall be implemented and
the Development Order amended pursuant to Section 380.06(19), Florida Statutes,
to include these solutions.
This agreement shall apply only to the impacted state facilities and shall be
consistent with the provisions of Rule 9J-2.045(6), F.A.C. and Section
380.06(15)(e), Florida Statutes.
18. Transoortation: Annual Reoorts. In each DRI annual report, the Developer agrees
that it shall report all information required in F.A.C. Rule 9J-2.025 to the City of
Oviedo and Seminole County. In addition, the annual report shall include turning
movement counts at Project entrances and the cumulative external traffic being
generated by the Project, either by actual count or through utilization of the most
current edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip Generation
Manual and development occupancy data. The chosen method shall be used
consistently through the life of the Project.
Should the results of the monitoring and modeling required above show that traffic
on SR 426 (Aloma Avenue) is 10% greater than the following volumes at the end
of Phase 2, then the monitoring and modeling for future traffic impacts shall
include an expanded study which focuses specifically on SR 426 impacts and
mitigation options.
.
.
! .,
.-,
I
STATUS
The Oviedo Marketplace Mall opened in March 1998.
Turning movement counts taken in November 1998 are show in Figure I.
The monitoring of traffic on SR 426 south of Mitchell Hammock Road does not
exceed the volumes projected for Phase 2 in the Oviedo Marketplace DRI,
November 1994.
Gl-20
.
I . 1
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Max. Peak Hour
Peak Hour Peak Direction Volume Allowed Peak Hour
Volume Reported Before Additional Directional Volume
See:ment of SR 426 in Analvsis Study Reauired Year 1999
Dean Road to 876 963 824
Chapman Road
Chapman Road to 806 886 779
Slavia Road
Slavia Road to 806 886 779
Mitchell Hammock Road
19. Settlement A2feemenl Toward the achievement of the objectives in the preceding
conditions, an agreement among the City of Oviedo, City of Winter Springs,
Rouse-Orlando, Inc., a Maryland corporation, and the Developer has been entered
into and incorporated by reference hereto. Said agreement addresses and clarifies
issues relating to mitigation for the impacts of the Project on transportation
facilities within said jurisdictions and other matters as are more specifically set
forth in said agreement. Nothing contained within said agreement alters or waives
the provisions and requirements of the other conditions contained in this
Development Order as a mitigative measure for the transportation impacts of the
Project. Furthennore, nothing contained within said agreement subrogates any
condition contained in this Development Order. .
01-21
, "
...,
I
STATUS
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
20. pedestrian and Bicvcle Circulation.
a. In the interest of safety, and to promote alternative fonns of transportation,
the Developer shall provide a safe system for cyclist and pedestrian
circulation on site. The Developer shall consult ECFRPC's and the
County's or the City of Oviedo's Bicycle Coordinator regarding provisions
for pedestrian and bicycle facilities. To the extent practicable, walkways
and bikeways shall be constmcted between the regional mall, peripheral.
retail, and the residential development surrounding the Project site,
provided, however, no bikeways or pedestrian walkways shall be
constructed on land other than the Property. On-site bikeways shall be
connected at Project entrances with external bicycle systems (if any) and
will be provided in accordance with the current State, County and City
standards at the time of implementation. Appropriate signage identifying
bike routes will be installed. The provision of bike lockers shall be required
for the mall and showers for employees strongly encouraged.
b.
Special attention shall be given to the provision of a bicycle connection
from the mall to the CSX railroad right-of-way. The CSX has announced
that it will abandon this right-of-way and the state and adjacent local
governments have expressed interest in acquiring this right-of-way for a
Rails-to- Trails project. The Developer shall participate in any planning
process initiated by the Metropolitan Planning Organization or local
government regarding this potential Rails-to- Trails project.
21. Ridesharine: Promun. The Developer shall make known to tenants of the Project
that it is served by an existing ridesharing program operated by LYNX. Transit
and current ridesharing infonnation shall be prominently displayed in public
gathering areas, in employment centers, and in commercial center areas. Upon
opening of the mall, a full time ridesharing coordinator shall be hired by the
Developer and funded by the Developer for the life of the Development Order for
the Oviedo Marketplace Project. The ridesharing coordinator is primarily
responsible for coordinating with the area trarisit provider, conducting ridesharing
campaigns within the Oviedo Marketplace Project, publicity, processing
applications, distributing infonnation (including transit infonnation), etc. This
position may be incorporated into the functions of any Transportation
Management Association ("TMA"), if one exists which services the area of the
Project.
.
.
"
",
'11
STATUS
Bicycle lockers and racks have been provided at the Mall. Six bicycle lockers
have been located within the Mall ("Service Court One") and additional bicycle
racks have been located at Mall entrances. .
The developer has met this condition; they have coordinated with the local
government to connect to the Rail!!-to-Trails project as requested. There is an 8'
sidewalk/bikepath, which connects the Mall to 426.
A rideshare coordinator has been appointed. Infonnation regarding ride sharing and
transit is available at the Customer Service Desk at the Mall.
Gl-22
.
.'
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
22.
Transit:
a. LYNX service connecting the Oviedo Marketplace Project to existing
routes, employment centers and appropriate residential areas shall be
initiated upon opening of the mall. The Oviedo Marketplace Project will
construct stops for the service, and coordinate with LYNX. At a minimum,
the Developer shall take the steps described in paragraph (b) hereunder to
facilitate at least one LYNX route to be operational to the Project site
through the period of effectiveness of the Development Order. At a
minimwn, transit operations shall be adequate to attract 100 peak hour
riders prior to Phase 3a and 200 peak hour riders at buildout.
b.
Transit passenger shelters and transit parking bays shall be constructed
where reasonably necessary to augment and facilitate the operations of off-
site transit facilities. The Developer shall consult with LYNX on the design
of bus facilities and amenities, including bus stops, to be located within the
Project boundaries. The following transit provisions shall be required, in
consultation with LYNX:
i. Transit service shall be located in proximity to mall entrances, or as
detennined to be necessary by LYNX and the City of Oviedo.
ii. Access and internal collector and arterial road geometries shall
accommodate an eight (8) feet wide by forty (40) feet long advance
design coach. The Developer shall provide shelters and pull-out bays
along the on-site transit route. Shelter locations shall be reasonably
accessible via walkways/crosswalks for pedestrian movement to and
. from buildings and shall meet all regulations required under the
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (as it may be amended from
time to time).
iii. Appropriate signage and sufficient area lighting will be required at
all bus stops and shelter locations.
iv. Transit schedule and infonnation displays will be provided, at a
minimwn, at each on-site bus stop.
v. Maintenance of transit amenities shall be the responsibility of the
CDD or a property owners' association fonned by the Developer.
vi. Details, standards and phasing of all transit amenity provisions must
be approved by LYNX.
vii. Pedestrian movement between bus stops shall not exceed 1300 feet.
viii. Shuttle service that may be provided within the Project, if any,
should develop an operating plan to coordinate with the LYNX
regional network, as applicable.
" "'
.'"1
tl
STATUS
Development is proceeding with this condition.
LYNX Bus Route 47 currently provides direct service to the Oviedo Marketplace
Mall and currently arrives twice during the peak hour, each bus accomodates 43
passengers. The TOP for Lynx shows that new service and re-alignment of
routes is scheduled for 2002. At that time there will then be three routes serving
the Oviedo Marketplace, providing expanded capacity.
A LYNX transit shelter has been l~cated at the Mall Stop.
GI-23
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
If additional property is necessary for bus stops beyond that which can be
accommodated within the existing right-of-way, then this land shall be
provided at no cost by the Developer. The need for additional land shall be
reviewable and resolved by Seminole County or the City of Oviedo upon
request by the Developer.
23. Transoortation Management Association.
a. The Developer shall become an active and financially supportive member of .
any Transportation Management Association ("TMA") which services this
area.
b.
Either through the TMA or individually, the Developer shall provide or
require of mall tenants of Phase 2 and employers in Phase 3 of the Project
the following:
i. Require that transit and ridesharing studies be conducted by
employers of more than SO people to assess travel patterns and
commuting needs. This infonnation shall be supplied to the TMA, if
one is operational, and LYNX, and sha1l be summarized and included
in the DR! Annual Report.
ii. Preferential parking will be provided by employers to their
employees who participate in rideshare programs.
iii. The Developer shall not prohibit the use of a portion of the mall
parking area as a rideshare lot. The Developer shall accommodate
this usage through coordination with LYNX, Seminole County, the
City of Oviedo and the Metropolitan Planning Organization. On-site
lots should accommodate at least 100 vehicles and may be shared
with parking for commercial land uses and should be coordinated
with 'available transit systems. .
iv. Promote and encourage variable work hours and flextime
participation by on-site employers.
v. Make known to tenants that the Project area is served by an existing
ridesharing program operated by LYNX. Future transit (when
available) and current ridesharing infonnation shall be prominently
displayed in all public gathering areas, in employment centers and in
commercial center areas. .
vi. Provide incentives, if necessary, to encourage the establislunent of
day care facilities within the Project.
Mandatory membership by all non-residential entities within the Project
shall be required through enforceable covenants or other similar
mechanisms as to those acquiring land within the Project after the effective
date of this Development Order.
c.
01-24
.
.
. ..,
...,
n
STATUS
Development is proceeding in compliance with this condition.
.
: I
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
24. Traffic Reduction Goals. The Developer shall commit to a defmite, but non-
binding, percentage goal toward the reduction in vehicle trips through the
promotion of walking, bicycling, ridesharing and transit usage. This shall be
encouraged by the Developer through incentives to tenants and landowners within
the Project. The percentage reduction goals shall be as follows:
Oviedo Marketplace DRI Overall
~ Peak Bour Traffic Reduction Goal
Phase 2 5.0% of peak hour volume
Phase 3a 10.0% of peak hour volume
Phase 3b 15.0% of peak hour volume
Within the cont~xt of the annual monitoring report, the Developer shall present an
evaluation of the state of the alternate transportation systems serving the site of the
DRI Project. Progress shall be compared to the goals stated above. Progress for
the reporting year shall be documented to include ridership levels, transit route
changes, alterations or additions, ridesharing participation, transit amenity
construction, park-and-ride lot sites, bicycles and pedestrian facilities, and other
efforts which facilitate movement into and around the site of the DRI Project by
means other than the single occupant vehicle.
25.
Proiect Access.
a. In order to provide safe access and to preserve operational capacity, left and
right turn deceleration lanes shall be constructed at all Project entrances.
Access to all regional roadways shall be limited to the greatest extent
possible.
b.
In order to facilitate movement within the site, minimize traffic on the
regional roadway network and to encourage sharing of access points to the
regional roadway network, the Developer shall where practical:
i. allow connections between adjacent projects where land use
compatibility allows, and;
ii. share and combine driveways and create internal circulation systems
to limit congestion along regional roadways.
F:\13136 - Viera-Oviedo Crossing 1999 Annual Rpt\Correspond\Annual Report\l999SeminoleExhG.doc
Gl-25
1
.,. ,
I
STATUS
The total PM Peak Hour external traffic represented in the Oviedo Marketplace DRI
Substantial Deviation and the projected external traffic based on lTE, 6111 Edition,
and on trip generation surveys are shown below:
PM Peak Bour Trip
Total In Out
Substantial Deviation
8,191
3,860 4,311
Currently Projected 7,956 3,708 4,248
111is represents a decrease of about 3%.
Development is proceeding in compliance with this condition.
(a) All project entrances have been constrocted. Left and right-turn deceleration
lanes have been constrocted at Red Bug Lake RoadIDovera Road, Red Bug Lake
Road/Oviedo Marketplace Boulevard, Red Bug Lake Roadffarget Entrance, and SR
426/0viedo Marketplace Boulevard.
(b) Connections between on-site parcels and combined on-site parcels have been
developed to the greatest extent possible. There is no opportunity for connections
between Oviedo Marketplace and adjacent properties.
.
.
.
PHASE 3 TRANSPORTATION MITIGATION PLAN
Oviedo Marketplace Monitoring/Modeling Study
This report provides data and analysis to supplement the Monitoring and Modeling Study for
Phase 3 of the Oviedo Marketplace DRl that was originally submitted in August 1999. The
purpose of this report is to support the proposed NOPC application for Phase 3.
BACKGROUND
The August 1999 MonitoringIModeling Study report has been reviewed by Seminole County, the
City of Oviedo, the ECFRPC, the FDOT and the DCA. The application has provided additional
information in response to requests. The 1999 MonitoringIModeling Study was based on the
development program shown in Table 1; also shown in Table 1 is the revised development
program for Phase 3. As shown, the MonitoringIModeling Study included Parcel 35 (50,000
square feet of retail and restaurant uses) and Parcel 34 (60,000 square feet of office showroom)
which have now been deleted from the development program.
The MonitoringIModeling Study projected significant and adverse impacts to the following
facilities:
1. SR436/Red Bug Lake Road intersection
2. SR434/SR426 intersection: the City of Oviedo's Capital Improvements Program now
includes the extension of Division Street from Mitchell Hammock Road north to East
Broadway Street so that the intersection will no longer be adverse in Year 2005.
3. SR426 from Red Bug Lake Road to Winter Springs Boulevard
PHASE 3 DEVELOPMENT PHASING
Because the widening of SR426 is not yet programmed for construction the Developer has
proposed to phase the development of Phase 3 to be consistent with the planned additional
roadway capacity. The Developer proposes to develop about 65% of Phase 3 before the impacts
to SR426 are projected. As shown in the attached Arterial Analysis of SR426, the forecasted
Year 2005 traffic volumes for this progra.rn can be adequately accommodated. The development
will not proceed beyond this level until after SR426 is programmed or a future
monitoring/modeling study is submitted which shows that the widening is not needed to
accommodate the balance of Phase 3.
Page2
T.blel
SU~1MARV or APPROVEDII'ROPOSI!D DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
O\'ledo Marketplaco
Intcnsity lotelUll.
Pba,e' I " 2 Pbase J Total Ph.,e 3 (2005) Pb.se 3 (2005) Revised
Land Use Parcel Constructed Apprond Au.ust J 999 Au.ust 1999 Berore SR426 hunrovenleol Ann SR426 Imnronment Tolal
Pha,el
Offica 18 o SF 500S0 SF o SF 50 050 SF o SF o SF 50 050 SF
Office 19 o SF 37,750 SF o SF 37,750 SF o SF o SF 37,750 SF
Convenience with R.at 20 o SF 2,720 SF o SF 2,720 SF o SF o SF 2,720 SF
Chih. 21A 5,683 SF o SF o SF 5 683 SF o SF o SF H83 SF
Target and Garden Center 21B 128,634 .SF o SF o SF 128,634 SF o SF o SF 128,634 SF
WeUllc$'s Center 22 39,000 SF o SF o SF 39,000 SF o SF o SF 39,000 SF
Commercial Retail 23 12205 SF o SF o SF 12 205 SF o SF o SF 12205 SF
Stenk-n~Shalcc 24 3,508 SF o SF o SF 3,508 SF o SF o SF 3,508 SF
azoli's H 3,206 SF o SF o SF 3,206 SF o SF o SF 3 206 SF
Bord.", Books 26 24,610 SF o SF o SF 24,610 SF o SF o SF 24,610 SF
Jared Jewelcn 26 6,051 SF o SF o SF 6,051 SF o SF o SF 6,052 SF
:laahty Restaurant 28 o SF II 200 SF o SF II 200 SF o SF o SF 11 200 SF
Family Funeral Care 29 8,682 SF o SF o SF 8,682 SF o SF o SF 8,682 SF
High 1\1I1I0\'er Restauranl 30 o SF 7,000 SF o SF 7,000 SF o SF o SF 7,000 SF
Retail 31 o SF IS 000 SF o SF IS 000 SF o SF o SF IS,OOO SF
Quality Reslaurunl 32 o SF 6,700 SF o SF 6,700 SF o SF o SF 6,700. SF
.
Ph..o 2
Regional Shouping Center 12 730,128 SF 369,872 SF o SF 1,100,000 SF o SF o SF 1,100,000 SF
Movie Theater 12 22 Scree.. o Screenl o ScreetlJ 22 ScrecnI o SctCeruI o S<reelll 22 Scree..
Retail 16 o SF 30,000 SF o SF 30,000 SF o SF o SF 30,000 SF
Medical Carnou. - Retail 17 o SF 10,000 SF o SF 10,000 SF o SF o SF 10,000 SF
Medioal C.mnu. - Medical Office 27 40 139 SF o SF o SF 40,139 SF o SF o SF 40 139 SF
Medical Carnoos - Medical Offic. 27 o SF 34,861 SF o SF 34,861 SF o SF o SF 34,861 SF
Medical Camo.. - DianOllio Services 27 o SF 12,000. SF o SF 12,000 SF o SF o SF 12,000 SF
Medical earno.. . Walk-In Clinic 27 5.981 SF o SF o SF 5981 SF o SF o SF 5.981 SF
EPOS - Ambulato\)' SorgelV Center 27 o SF 12,000 SF o SF 12,000 SF o SF o SF 12,000 SF
over Restaurant 35 o SF 7 000 SF o SF 7 000 SF o SF o SF o SF.
llover Restaurant 3S o SF MOO SF o SF MOO SF o SF o SF o SF
1 ThmoYcr Restaurant 35 o SF 3,200 SF o SF 3,200 SF o SF o SF o SF
ualitv ReslllUl1l1l1 3S o SF 7000 SF o SF 7 000 SF o SF o SF o SF
uality Re.tauranl 35 o SF 6,400 SF o SF 6,400 SF o SF o SF o SF
Quality Restaurunl 35 o SF 7,300 SF o SF 7,300 SF o SF o SF o SF
Retail 35 o SF 13 500 SF o SF 13 500 SF o SF o SF o SF
PhAse J
Retail . 13 o SF o SF 180,000 SF 180,000 SF . 180,000 SF o SF 180,000 SF
High Turnover Restawant 13 o SF o SF 10,000 SF 10,000 SF 10,000 SF o SF 10,000 SF
Hiah Tumo\'er Restaurant 13 o SF o SF 10000 SF 10,000 SF 10,000 SF o SF 10 000 SF
Medical Carno.. . Medical Offic. IS o SF o SF 59,000 SF 59,000 SF 59,000 SF o SF 59,000 SF
Medical CamplUJ . H05Pital 27 o SF o SF 120 SF 120 SF 120 SF o SF 120 SF
Office/Showroom 34 o SF o SF 60,000 SF 60 000 SF o SF o SF o SF
Single Fomily 36 o DU o DU 4 DU . DU 4 DU o DU 4 DU
Retail 14 o SF o SF 160 000 SF 160 000 SF o SF 160 000 SF 160 000 SF
Stxln;,: Tit. VJ,ra Cornpa,v
n..__~
O/alll'll. Jacbofl Xlrcu' ~tlS Lopa RtM4d:rt" lhc.
.i
.
.
Page 3
.
ARTERIAL ANALYSIS OF S~4!z6
Oviedo Marketplace 2005 Buildout Program Without Parcel 14
PURPOSE
This analysis supplements the MonitoringIModeling Study for Phase 3, buildout of the Oviedo
Marketplace DR! submitted in August 1999. The purpose is to provide a basis for phasing
development of Phase 3 with planned increases in roadway capacity.
The Phase 3 development program has been sub-phased to be consistent with planned additional
roadway capacity. For the purpose of traffic mitigation, Phase 3 is herein referred to as Phase 3A
and Phase 38. The Phase 3A development program omits Parcels 34, 35 and ~4. A supplemental
traffic analysis has been conducted for SR426 from Red Bug Lake Road to Winter Springs
Boulevard based on the following assumptions:
deletion of Parcel 35
deletion of Parcel 34
shifting of Parcel 14 to Phase 3B
inclusion ofWal*Mart traffic in the development of background traffic
. The mitigation phasing plan is presented in Table 1.
TRIP GENERATION
The projections of total trip generation for Phase 3A are based on the estimates of trip generation
contained in the MonitoringIModeling Study, except that the trip.generation associated with
parcels 35, 34 and 14 has been deleted. A summary of daily and pm peak-hour trip generation
for Phase 3A is presented in Table 2. Internal capture and .pass-by trips have been adjusted to
reflect the deletion of Parcel 35 and Parcel 34 (the Wal*Mart parcel) and the shifting of Parcel 14
to Phase 3B (Tables 3 and 4).
TRIP DISTRIBUTIONI ASSIGNMENT
.
The distribution of project trips (Phase I through Phase 3A) is based on the distribution of
project traffic approved for use in the August 1999 MonitoringIModeling Study. The projections
of Phase 3A intersection turning movement volumes is based on a percentage relationship from
the turning movement volumes in the August 1999 MonitoringIModeling Study. For example,
the Year 2005 northbound approach to the SR426/0viedo Marketplace Boulevard intersection is
787 (Table 4-1 in the MonitoringIModeling Study), 401 lefts and 386 thrus (Year 2005
intersection analysis, page 161 in the Appendix to the MonitoringIModeling Study). Applying
the project distribution percentage for the segment of SR426 from Red Bug Lake Road to Oviedo
Marketplace Boulevard to the pm peak-hour external trips for Phase 3A (6,676 - Table 2) results
in 1,270 Phase 3A peak-hour trips. The total peak-hour project trips on this segment contained in
the MonitoringIModeling Study is 1505 (787 northbound and 718 southbound). The northbound
represents 52.3% of the total. Therefore, the Phase 3A project traffic in the northbound approach
Page 4
to the SR426/0viedo Marketplace intersection is 664 (1270 x .523 = 664). Turning movement
volwnes were projected in the same way. The northbound lefts in the MonitoringIModeling
Study are 401,50.95 percent of the approach volwne (401/787 = .5095). Therefore, the Phase
3A northbound lefts are 338 (664 x .5095 = 338) and the thrus are 326 (664-338 = 326).
.
BACKGROUND TRAFFIC
Background (non-project) traffic was obtained by subtracting project traffic from total traffic for
each turning movement for each intersection used in this analysis. For example, the Year 2005
intersection analysis for SR426/0viedo Marketplace Boulevard (page 161 in the Appendix to the.
August 1999 MonitoringIModeling Study) shows a northbound through volwne of 1,497 of
which 386 is project traffic. Therefore, the background volwne is 1,111 (1,497-386 = 1,111).
The distribution and assignment ofWal*Mart traffic was obtained from the Traffic Impact Study
for Wal * Mart, June 1999. Exhibit 3 from the above study is included in the Appendix to this
report.
ARTERIAL ANALYSIS
The evaluation of SR426 from Red Bug Lake Road to Winter Springs Boulevard is based on the
distribution of project traffic approved for use in the August 1999 MonitoringIModeling Study, .
the Phase 3A development program and the assignment of Wal * Mart traffic contained in the
Traffic Impact Analysis for Wal*Mart submitted to the City of Oviedo June 1999. An analysis of
the above segment of SR426 was conducted using Highway Capacity analysis software for Urban
and Suburban Arterials Release 3.1 and ART-PLAN Release 3.1. Figure 1 shows the turning
movement volwnes at each of the intersections along SR426 from Red Bug Lake Road to Lake
Jessup Drive. The analysis of these intersections served as the basis for the HCS Urban Arterial
and ART-PLAN analyses. In both cases the peak-direction is projected to operate at LOS "C"
with an average travel speed of24.8 mph and 22.9 mph respectively.
Copies of the arterial analyses and the intersection analyses are included in the Appendix to this
report.
CONCLUSION
The analyses contained in this report project that SR426 will operate at an acceptable level of
service in Year 2005 with buildout of Phase 3A. Therefore, once the mitigation for the impact
to SR436/Red Bug Lake Road has been satisfied, development of Phase 3A may commence:
Prior to development beyond Phase 3A (73,065 external daily trip ends) the impact to SR426
from Red Bug Lake Road to Winter Springs Boulevard must be programmed for construction
within the ensuing three years or mitigation must be provided or a study submitted which shows
that the improvement is not needed to accommodate Phase3B.
.
.
.
.
Page 5
Table 2
SUMMARY OF DAILY AND PM PEAK-HOUR TRIP GENERATION, PHASE 3A, YEAR 2005
Oviedo Marketplace
Dally I Dally PM Peak-Hour
Land Use Parcel ITE Intensitv Trip Ends I Rate Total Rate In Out
Phase la & Ib
Office 18 710 50,050 GFA 780 0.0 135 0.0. 23 112
Office 19 710 37,750 GFA 628 16.6 122 3.2 21 101
Convenience WIth gas 20 853 2,720 GFA 2,300 845.6 170 62.6 85 85
Chihs 21A (1) 5,683 GFA 741 130.3 68 12.0 42 26
Target with Garden Center 21B (1) 128,634 GLA 6,782 52.7 401 3.1 213 189
Wellness Center 22 (1) 39,000 GFA 1,677 43.0 163 4.2 91 72
Retail 23 820 12,205 GLA 1,763 144.4 157 12.8 75 81
Steak-n-Shake . 24 (1) 3,508 GFA 457 130.3. 51 14.4 29 22
Retail 24W 820 14,997 GLA 2,013 134.2 180 12.0 86 93
Fazolis 25 (1) 3,206 GFA 418 130.3 57 17.8 35 22
Borders Books 26 (2) 24,610 GFA 1,001 40.7 47 1.9 32 16
Jared Jewelers - 26 (2) 6,052 GFA 246 40.7 56 9.3 20 36
Quality Restaurant 28 831 11,200 GLA 1,007 90.0 84 7.5 56 28
Family Funeral Care 29 (3) 8,682 GFA 79 9.1 6 0.7 3 3
HIgh Turnover Restaurant 30 832 7,000 GFA 912 130.3 76 10.9 46 30
Retail 31 820 15.000 GLA 2,013 134.2 180 12.0 86 93
Quality Restaurant 32 831 6,700 GFA 603 90.0 50 7.5 34 17
Subtotal Phase 1 23,420
Phase 2
RegIOnal Shopping Center 12 820 1,100,000 GLA 31,856 29.0 3,056 2.8 1,467 1,589
Movie Theater 12 (6) 22 Scr. 3,373 153.3 160 7.3 61 99
Retail 16 820 30,000 GLA 3,143 104.8 284 9.5 136 148
Medical Campus - Retail 17 820 10,000 GLA 1,551 155.1 137 13.7 66 71
Medical Campus - Medical Office 27 720 40,139 GFA 1,426 35.5 131 3.3 35 96
MedIcal Campus - Medical Office 27 720 34,861 GFA 1.211 34.7 115 3.3 31 84
Medical Campus - Diagnostic Center 27 (4) 12,000 GFA 377 31.5 62 5.2 25 37
Medical Campus - Walk-In Clinic 27 (2) 5,981 GFA 188 31.5 52 8.7 16 36
Medical Campus - Ambulatory Surgery Center 27 (4) 12,000 GFA 377 31.5 62 5.2 25 37
Subtotal Phase 2 43,503
Phasc3A
Retail 13 820 180.000 GLA 9,947 55.3 926 5.1 444 481
High Turnover Restaurant 13 832 10,000 GFA 1;303 130.3 109 10.9 65 43
High Turnover Restaurant 13 832 10,000 GFA 1,303 130.3 109 10.9 65 43
Medical Campus - MedIcal Office 15 720 59,000 GFA 2,198 37.2 187 3.2 51 137
MedIcal Campus - Hospital 27 610 120 Beds 2,604 21.7 146 1.2 50 97
Single Fanuly ReSIdential 36 210 4 DU 54 13.4 6 1.5 4 2
Subtotal Phase 3A 17.410
Total 84,332 7,544 3,519 4,025
Internal Capture 6,144 400 200 200
TranSIt 500 100 50 50
Pass-By 4.623 368 184 184
Net External 73.065 6676 3,085 . 3.591
GF A - gross floor area
GLA = gross leasable =
(I) Trip generntion for the PM pellk:hour for Chills, Fazo1is, Steak-n-Shake.Target with Gsrden Center and the Wellness Center is estimated based on
surveys conducted at the Oviedo Msrl.:elplace during JWle 1998. Daily trip generation is based on ITE rntes.
(2) Trip generation for the PM pellk-hour for Bord= Books, Jared Jewelers and the Walk-In Clinic is estimated based on swveys conducted at the Oviedo Msrl.:etplace during
April 1999. Daily trip generation is based onITE rntes.
(3) Trip generation for the FWleral Home was assumed to be very similar to a church, therefore, the ITE trip generation rates
for . church were used.
(4) Trip generation for the Diagnostic Center, Urgent Care Center and Ambulatoty Surgery Center W1lS estimated using the clinic rate (Walk-In Clinic PM rate based on survey).
(5) Office/Showroom was calculated at 30'10 offiee and 70% showroom
(6) Trip generation for the Movie Theater (100,000 square feet) is based on surveys conducted during July 1998 and is based on 22 screens.
Source: rTE Trip Generation Report, Sixth Edition, 1997
Glolting Jackson KercJwr Anglin Lopez Rinehart, 1nc.
Page 6
Table 3
SUMMARY OF PM PEAK-HOUR INTERNAL CAPTURE, PHASE 3A, YEAR 2005
Oviedo Marketplace
Regional , I I I
Shopping . Movie Medical
Fromffo Center Theater Office Hospital Office Retail. Restaurant Total
Regional Shopping Center 0 22 0 16 8 14 32 92
Movie Theater 22 0 0 0 0 14 14 50
Office 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hospital 16 0 0 0 40 2 12 70
Medical Office 8 0 0 40 0 4 10 62
Retail 14 14 0 2 4 0 12 46
Restaurant 32 14 0 12 10 12 0 80
Total 92 50 0 70 62 46 80 .400
Source: G/atling Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Page 7
Table 4 '
SUMMARY OF PASS-BY ESTIMATES, PHASE 3A; YEAR 2005
Oviedo Marketplace
\
Daily Daily PM PH PM PH
Land Use Parcel Intensity Pass-By % Trip Ends Pass-By Trip Ends Pass-By
Target with Garden Center 2IB 128,634 SF .15% 6,962 1,044 401 60
Convenience Market 20 2,720 SF 45% 2,300 1,035 170 77
Chilis 21A 5,683 SF 20% 741 148 68 14
Retail 23 12,205 SF 15% 1,763 264 157 24
Steak-n-Shake 24 3,508 SF 20% 457 91 51 10
Fazolis 25 3,206 SF 20% 418 84 35 7
High Turnover Restaurant 28 7,700 SF 20% 1,007 201 83 17
Retail 30 7,000 SF 15% 912 137 119 18
Retail 31 15,000 SF 15% 2,013 302 180 27
Retail 32 6,700 SF 15% 603 90 50 8
Retail 16 30,000 SF 15% 3,143 471 284 43
Retail 17 10,000 SF 15% 1,551 233 137 21
High Turnover Restaurant 13 10,000 SF 20% 1,303 261 109 22
High Turnover. Restaurant 13 10,000 SF 20% 1,303 261 109 22
Total Pass-By -
24476 4.623 1953 368
Source: Gla/tillg Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, [!'Ic.
ITE Trip Generation Report, Fifth Edition, 1991
Seminole County Road Impact Fees 1990 Update
..0
I"'-
IlLakJ.O'
S e esup nve
~ L'I+ [0]+(0)=11
+ + +
~ ~ ~ ~404+ [106]+(15) =525
~ ~ L r52+ [0]+(0) =52
Page 8
ffi <Xl
0- .....
II ..0
Lri II
'+ s
;:::::" '+
~ S
o
~
&.I'l ~
~ II
~ Lri 153+ [56]+(5) =214
II........
S '+ II 694+ [125]+(16) =835~
~ ~ ~ L 34+ [56]+(5) =95~
+ j; S 15+[0]+(0)=15
~ ..... ~ ~ 13+ [0]+(0) =13
~ 1 L r58+ [0]+(0) =58
Winter Springs Blvd t - i
. 219+ [0]+(0) =2'9~ I r
10+ [0]+(0) =IO~ ~ ~ '"
..00-
249+ [186]+(25) =46~ ;!..;!.. €
..0 ..0 +
........0
++......
......- +
S~....
.... ....
...... ......
I"'-
....
0-
~ II
S
II &.I'l
S+
+0
...... Cl
:g ~
+
+ ~
Jl
Oviedo Marketplace Blvd
0+ [132]+(0) =132--1
0+ [332]+(5) =337~
....
<Xl &.I'l ....
...,. <Xl
~ II .....
II r::: II
s ..... ;:::;-
'+ '+ 0-
...... ~ '+
&.I'l ......
<Xl I"'-
0
+ ~
+
..... ..... +
..... ...,. 0-
.... .... <Xl
~ ~ L
Red Bug Lake Road t
. 192+ [303]+(0) =495~
553+ [465]+(0) =1018~
215+ [176]+(0) =391~
~
.
lir
0- I"'- &.I'l
..0 0- ...,.
II II II
---
&.I'l 0 0
+++
............-
-0 0 0
~ ............
...... + +
+ I"'-.&.I'l
<Xl 0- ...,.
+ +
I"'- ...,.
-0 ~
~ -0
.
Ir
..... 0-
...,. <Xl
..... ...,.
II II
Ln'-
- ....
+ &.I'l
5'+
..... ~
~....
-+- ~
o +
L 179+ [224]+(44) =447
~557+ [454]+(44) =1055
r244+ [0]+(0) =244
lir
..... .... 0
<Xl - 0-
_ &.I'l ......
II II II
=~S
- .... '+
++,.....
......_0
&.I'll"'-......
&.I'l ..... +
~~~
+ + .....
I"'-
LEGEND
69lJJ4+ [12u5]+(IL6) =815
Total
~~:a~
Backgroune
Figur~ I
Intersection Turning Movement Volumes
PM Peak-Hour, Year 2005
&.I'l
.....
I.....U.
...~--
..._u..
~;:::.~ OVIEDO MARKETPLACE
Page 9
.
APPENDIX
.
.
Page A-I
.
Assignment ofWal*Mart Traffic
.
.
.-
~
"'
...
rll
IS>
1 ~
11
l>
~
J _I'
, --"" ~
16-
. ...,..
lS
OVIEDO.MAI<KETFLACE I
. BLVO. ....,.. ~ I
IS>
/lJ
..
'"
..
"
~
m
o
o
:I
~~
.~
0'
""- I
~ ;:~'
00- f
>1 (22) --""
t:
o
o
~
~
o
;0
~
~
~
129 (68) -=a. ~
u: ::: s
~ ~~ N
.
~. J -.L $~ (49) I ~ ~..
_10 ...-44
f U(l2)---3" ~ I
- .
J -28
MITCHELL HAI"NOCK RO.
~::: 1
4. --.. --
w- . RED euu
LAKE ROAD
lU-
5LAvIA ROAD J I
. --"" I
lS
NOTE,
NOT TO 6CALE
IS>
;0
..
a:
P'1!!! n -Horn
"-l........U ard Assodalas. lex;.
EXI-HBIT 3
PROJECTEDFROJECT
PM PEAK \-lOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES
UJAL * HART
OVIEDO. FLORIDA
lffillill;
--to- DIRECTION
:1 t Ft1 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
(10) FASSER-6Y TRIFS
.
.
..
'1:l
PJ
l.Q
"11>
:r>'
I
N
.......II:.J..'.....',,,O'......'" ~.,..." w.....J "..Iil
Page A-3
.
HCS Urban and Suburban Analysis
.
.
HCS: Urban and Suburban Arterials Release 3.2
A-'f
John J. Moore
Glatting Jackson
33 E. Pine Street
Orlando, Florida 32801
.
Phone: 407-843-6552
E-Mail: jmoore@glatting.com
Fax: 407-839-1789
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
Arterial Name:
File Case:
Prepared By:
Direction:
Date:
SR426
3458
GJ
North-bound
04/10/2000
Description of Arterial
Analysis Period Length
1.00 hr
Seg.
Cross Street Name
Length
(mi)
Art.
Class
Free
Flow
Speed
. (mph)
Running
Time
( sec)
Section
o
1 Mitchell Hammock Blvd.
2 Oviedo Marketplace Blvd.
3 Winter Springs Blvd.
4 SR426
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12 .
13
14
15
0.70
0.50
0.55
0.80
2
2
2
2
40
40
40
40
64.3
46.5
51. 0
73.0
1
2
3
4
.
Intersection Delay Estimates
Seg Cycle Green v/c Lane PVG Arr. I Unit Init. Cntrl. Other Inter.
Length Ratio Ratio Cap. if Type Fac- Ext. Queue Delay Delay LOS
C g/C X c Input AT tor (sec) (veh) ( sec) (sec)
1 149.0 0.208 0.682 751 3 1. 000 3.0 0 57.0 0.0 E
2. 120.0 0.800 0.980 1520 3 0.674 3.0 0 34.0 0.0 C
3 119.0 0.664 0.734 1261 3 0.139 3.0 0 13.4 0.0 ~.
4 83.0 0.229 0.649 325 3 0.602 -3.0 0 31.8 0.0
5
6
7
8
9
.~
12.
13
14
15
A-~
Arterial Level of Service
Inter. Sum of Sum of Arterial
Running Control. Other Time by Length by Arterial LOS by
Seg. Sect. Time Delay Delay Section Section Speed Section
(see) . (see) (see) (sec) (mi) (mph)
1 1 64.3 57.0 0.0 121. 3 0.70 20.8 D
2 2 ~6.5 34.0 0.0 80.5 0.50 22.4 C
3 3 51.0 13.4 0.0 64.4 0.55 30.7 B
4 4 73.0 31.8 0.0 104.7 0.80 27.5 C
5
6
7
8
9
.10
11
12
13
14
15
Grand Sum of Time (x) = 370.9 see
Grand Sum of Length ( y) 2.55 miles
Arterial Speed = 3600 x (y)!(x) = 24.8 mph
Arterial Level of Service, LOS = C
.
1 :
2 :
3:
4 :
5:
6:
7:
8 :
9:
10:
11:
12:
13:
Intersection Files in the
E:\JOHN\123-Data\OCROSS\Int\426mh05rev.hcs
E:\JOHN\123-Data\OCROSS\Int\426omb05rev.hcs
E:\JOHN\123-Data\OCROSS\Int\426wsb05rev.hcs
E:\JOHN\123-Data\OCROSS\Int\4261j05rev.hes
Analysis
Page A-6
.
ART-PLAN Analysis
.
.
.
.
.
DESCRIPTION
Road Name SR426
From Mitchell Hammock Road
To Lake Jessup Drive
Peak Direction Northbound
Off-Peak Direction Southbound
Study Time Period 4 - 5 PM
Analysis Date April 10, 2000
User Notes Default Spreadsheet
TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
MDT
K Factor
o Factor
Peak Hour Factor
Adj. Saturation Flow Rate
% Tums from Exclusive Lanes
0.091
0.568
0.980
1,850
33
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
# Through Lanes Peak Direction
# Through Lanes Off-Peak Direction
Urbanized, Transitioning/Urban, or Rural
Arterial Class
Free Flow Seed m h
SIGNAUZA nON CHARACTERISTICS
Arrival Type Peak Direction
Arrival Type Off-Peak Direction
Type Signal System
System Cycle Length
Weighted Through Movement glC
(1,2,3,4,5,6)
3
3
S
118
0.43
f'sPr81lmed.A=Ac1uIlted,S=Serriaduated
11-7
,q-e
.
$'~gm!;lI1.
1-2 MI1cheI HII/IIIlOd( Oviedo MI<1pL
2-3 Oviedo MkIpl Winter Spgs. BY.
3-4 WInter Spgs. BY. Lake Jessup Or.
4-5
5-6
6-7
7-8
8-9
9-10
Section Length:
1.6845 Mile(s}
.
10-9
9-8
8-7
7-6
6-5
5-4
4-3 0 736 26.6 1 119 3
3-2 0 1,112 16.6 1 .120 3
2-1 0 1,252 63.9 1.5 150 3
10-9
9-8
8-7
7-6
6-5
5-4
4-3 Lake Jessup Or. WInter Spgs. BY. 551
3-2 WInter Spgs. BY. Oviedo Mklpt 946
2-1 Oviedo Mklpt Mitchell Hanvnoc:t< 461
Section Length:
1.6845 mile{s}
0.77
1.01
0.80
35.1
.53.0
59.3
D
D
E
24.9
16.2
14.9
C
E
E
.
Table A-4
f\l;~
. .
SUPPORT DATA FOR ART-PLAN LEVEL OF SERVICE ESTIMATE
SR426 from Mitchell Hammock Road to Lake Jessup Drive
Oviedo Marketplace DRI
.
KlOO
I Daily Peak-Hour. Peak - Dally
Date Peak-Hour I Volume Volume Ratio
11-17-98 4:00 - 5:00 20,682 1,237 0.060
11-18-98 4:00 . 5:00 19,183 1,295 0.068
11-19-98 4:00 - 5:00 17,294 1,293 0.075
11-20-98 4:00 - 5:00 17,800 1,271 0.071
A VeJ"lUfes N/A 18740 N/A 0.068
Model Output Conversion Factor (MOCF) =
Average peak to daily ratio =
Estimated KI00 = .068/0.97 =
0.97
0.068
0.0701
D Factor
Peak-Hour Peak Off-Peak D
Date Volume Direction Direction Factor
11-17-98 1,237 703 534 0.568
11-18-98 1.295 739 556 0.571
11-19-98 1,293 713 580 0.551
11-20-98 1,271 739 532 0.581
Averalte 1274 724 551 0.568
D Factor -
0.568
Peak-Hour Factor
.
I Peak-Hour 15 Minute Period Peak-Hour
Date I Volume 1st 2nd 3rd .4th Factor
11-17-98 1,237 324 301 318 294 0.95
11-18-98 1,295 329 322 324 320 0.98
11-19-98 1.293 328 329 330 309 0.98
11-20-98 1,271 319 311 323 318 0.98
A vcnillC N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.98
Peak-Hour Factor-
0.98
Percent Turns From Exclusive lAnes
Total Exclusive Total I Exclusive
Intersection Approach Tums 0/0 Approach I Tums 0/0
Mitchell Hammock Rd 1085 573 52.8% 1252 800 63.9%
Oviedo MarkelDlace Blvd. 1832 343 19.7% 1112 185 16.6%
Winter Sorinl!S Blvd. 1621 703 43.4% 736 196 26.6%
Lake Jessuo Dr. 1144 214 18.7% 588 52 8.8"10
Avera..e 5.682 1833 32.3% 3688 1233 33.4%
NorthbotmdlEastbOlDld
Southbound/Wcstbotmd
g/C Ratio
.
Cye/e Through Cye/e Through
Intersection Len;h e./C Len;h e./C
Mitchell Hammock Rd 149 0.208 150 0.208
Oviedo Marketplace Blvd. 120 0.800 120 0.508
Winter SorinflS Blvd. 119 0.664 119 0.387
Lake Jessuo Dr. 83 0.506 83 0.506
Averalte of3 hilZhest 118 0.657 118 0.467
NorthboUlldlEastbound
SouthboundIW estboUlld
g/C = (0.657+.208/2 = 0.432 g/C = (0.467+.208)/2 = 0.338
Sowce:
GIatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
\
pr-I t)
Page
RCS-Signals 3.2 File:426MH05REV.HCS *
HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2
Inter: SR426/Mitchell Hammock
Analyst: GJ
Date: 03/30/2000
E/W St: Mitchell Hammock Blvd.
City/St: Oviedo
proj #: 3458
period: PM PH, Year 2005
N/S St: SR426
.
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Eastbound Westbound Northbound
L .T R L T R L T R
Southbound
L T R
1
L
244
12.0
o
2
(fjj;L
12.U
2 1
+~
1 .U 12.0
200
No. Lanes 2 2 0
LGConfig L T
.Volume 495 1018
Lane Width 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vol
2.
T
1055
12.0
Duration 1. 00 Area Type: All other areas
Signal 0 erations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left A A NB Left A
Thru A A Thru A
Right A Right A
Peds Peds
WB Left A SB Left A
Thru A Thru A
Right A Right A
Peds Peds
NB Right P EB Right ..
SB Right P P WB Right
Green 22.0 8.0 50.0 19.0 3~.0
Yellow 3.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
All Red ~ 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Cycle Length 149. secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 799 3502 0~62 0.228 53.2 D
T 1405 3610 0.72 0.389 40.6 D 44.7 D
Westbound
L 267 .1805 0.91 0.148 110.0 F
T 1211 3610 0.87 0.336 54.2 D 64.7 E
Northbound.
L 447 3502 0.41 0.128 60.4 E
T 751 3610 0.68 ~ 57.0 E 52.3 D
R 629 1615 0.30 O. 89 31.8 C
Southbound
L 447 3502 0.85 ~ 80.8 F
T 751 3610 0.60 .208 54.8 D 57.9 E .;
R 759 1615 0.29 0.470 24.4 C
Intersection Delay = 54.5 ( sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D
!1-1}
RCS-Signals 3.2 File:4260MB05REV.HCS *
HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2
Inter: SR426/0viedoMarketplace
.yst: GJ
: 03/30/2000 .
E/W St: Oviedo Marketplace Blvd.
Page
City/St: Oviedo
proj #: 3458
Period: PM PH, Year. 2005
N/S St: SR426
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
. Eastbound Westbound Northbound
L T R L T R L T R
Southbound
L T R
No. Lanes 2 0 1
LGConfig L R
Volume 132 337
Lane Width 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vol 200
Duration 1.00 Area
o
o
o
o 1 1
C;!7~
.0 .0
70
o
Type: All other areas
Signal 0 erations
3 4
Phase Combination 1
EB Left A
Thru
Right
Peds
WB Left
Thru
Right
Peds
. Right
Right
Green 14.0
Yellow 4.0
All Red ~ .
Cycle Length 120.0 secs .
Intersection Performance
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s)
2
A
v/c
g/C
D
Eastbound
L 409
3502
0.32
0.117 49.1
E
R 188
Westbound
1615
0.73 0.117
NB
Left
Thru
Right
Peds
Left
Thru
Right
Peds
Right
Right
5
A
A
8
6 7
A
SB
A
A
EB
WB
30.0
4.0
1.0
61.0
4.0
1.0
Summary
Lane Group
Approach
Delay LOS
Delay LOS
57.5 E
65.6
/-1--,1-
ReS-Signals 3.2 File:426WSB05REV.RCS *
Page
HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2
Inter: SR426/Winter Springs Blvd.
Analyst: GJ
Date: . 03/30/2000
E/W St: Winter Springs Blvd.
City/St: Oviedo
proj #: 3458
period: PM PH, Year 2005
N/S St: SR426
.
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Eastbound Westbound Northbound
L T R L T R L T R
Southbound
L T R
No. Lanes
LGConfig
Volume
Lane Width
RTOR Vol
1
L
219
12.0
1
T
10
12.0
1
R
460
12.0
180
o
1
LT
13
12.0
1
R
15
12.0
o
2
1
T
926 CD.
12.0
58
Duration 1. 00 Area Type: All other areas
Signal 0 erations .
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left A NB Left A
Thru A Thru A A
Right A Right A A
Peds Peds
WB Left A SB Left A
Thru A Thru A
Right A Right A
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right .
SB Right WB Right
Green 30.0 28.0 46.0
Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0
All Red 1.0 1.0 1.0
Cycle Length~. secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
.
Eastbound
L 318 1262 0.69 0.252 46.6 D
T 479 1900 0.02 0.252 33.5 C 45.6 D
R 407 1615 0.69 0.252 45.2 D
Westbound
LT 372 1477 0.19 0.252 35.2 D 34.9 C
R 407 1615 0.04 0.252 33.6 C
. Northbound
L 824 3502 0.84 0.235 52.0 D
.T 1261 1900 0.73 ~ 15.4 B 31.0 C
R 1072 1615 0.01 0.664 6.8 A
Southbound
L 215 555 0.01 ~ 22.5 C
.T 734 1900 0.74 . 87 35.3 D 33.2 C
R 624 1615 0.20 0.387 24.4 C .
Interse.ction Delay = 34.2 ( sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C
._...u.,._.'......_ _.___ _"_.__0.. ... '.
f\"- r~
Page
Hcs-Signals 3.2 File:426LJ05REV.HCS *
HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2
.Inter: SR426/Lake.Jessup
yst:GJ.
e : . 03/30/2000
E/W St: SR426
City!St: Oviedo
Proj #: 3458
period: PM PH, Year 2005
N/S St: Lake Jessup
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Eastbound Westbound Northbound
L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes
LGConfig
Volume
Lane Width'
RTOR Vol
1 0
o
o
0 1 0 0 1 1
LTR LT R .' . , . . , -
69 97 45 76 63 93 .' - ~ ,_r'
12.0 12.0 12.0
0 0 ".'-' . ..
:Of .
. ' .r.__
Duration
1.00
Area Type: All other areas
Signal 0 erations
3 4
Phase Combination 1
EB Left A
Thru
Right
Peds
WB Left
Thru
Right
Peds
. Right
Right
Green 9.0 42.0
Yellow 3.0 4.0
All Red . 0.0 1.0 .
Cycle Length 183 . 0) secs .
~Intersection.Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capaci ty (s)
2
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
v/c
g/C
Eastbound
L 478
TR 947
NB
Left
Thru
Right
Peds
Left
Thru
Right
Peds
Right
Right
SB
EB
WB
Southbound
L T R
. .. ~ .~ .: ..: '. ~ w, ~~
5
A
A
A
6 7
8
.1.'.',.
~ . .' .
A
A
A
-
. _ ~ . J :.
'. ,"
.~ r. .~.
19.0
4.0
1.0
r, ~, ';. '.'
I.' . _." _
Delay LOS
Approach
Delay LOS
1871
0.45
0.98
0.651 8.8
~ 63.4
Westbound
L 265
TR 958
1894
0.20
0.56
0.651
~
Northbound
LTR
325
1421
0.65
0.229
Southbound
17.3
14.9
33.6
.
202 883 0.69
370 1615 0.25
Intersection Delay = 38.9
0.229 39.2
0.229 26.5
( sec/veh)
A
E
53.2
D
'. . f,} ':'i,~:; .:,."
B
B
B
15.1
T
-,
..
. . ~' ... .:. .:~ ~:.; "':{.: ,,:.
,.
'.. .... .
~ ... ..1
C
33.6
c
.. 1~" ..
~'1
,. ... .:.,.-\..~~.;. ',,; .-:'(,1.
D 34.1 C
C
Intersection LOS -
e.'
.1.
'. :,' :~
D.'. '. r
.... ._1.