HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000 08 28 Regular C Sign Permits
COMMISSION AGENDA
ITEM C
Consent
Informational
Public Heslring
Regular X
August 14. 2000
Meeting
p/
Mgr. /--YiJ
Authorization" -
REQUEST:
The Community Development Department-Code Enforcement Division requests
the City Commission consider information regarding sign permits.
PURPOSE:
The purpose of this agenda item is to request the City Commission consider infc)rmation
regarding proposed language that would amend the city code requiring sign pennits to be
renewed annually.
APPLICABLE LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY:
Under current regulations, a permit must be obtained prior to the installation of any sign over 6
square feet. A sign that is nonconforming because of the State Road 434 Redevelopment and
Development Area Design Guidelines must come into compliance by November 14,2002. A
permit is required for renovations or new installations. There is no requirement for a renewal
permit.
CONSIDERATIONS:
A survey of other cities was conducted to ascertain if an annual permit is required in addition to
the permit for installation of a new sign. Cape Canaveral, Boca Raton, Cape Coral, Coral
Gables, Oviedo, Orlando, and Winter Park do not require annual permits for signs.
If the City Commission wishes to require, by ordinance, that all sign permits must be renewed
annually, the following should be considered. Signs that are grandfathered under the city code
must be considered. The City recently passed an ordinance providing non-conforming signs
AUGUST 14,2000
REGULAR AGENDA ITEM
Page 2
along S.R. 434 a grace period until November 14, 2002 to come into compliancc~. Notice has
been sent to these business and property owners informing them that they have lmtil November
14,2002 to come into compliance with current regulations.
If the commission decides to require an annual sign permit, the following would be required:
. A system would be established to identify affected signs.
· An ordinance amendment would be prepared and scheduled for public hearing.
. An annual fee would be established and the fee schedule amended by resolution.
· The affected sign owner would complete an application and pay the annual fee. The
application would require copies of occupational license and proof ofworkrnan's comp and
liability insurance.
· Applications would be reviewed by the Planning and Building division for code compliance.
· The applicant would be provided a sticker that must be attached to the back of the sign. The
sticker would have a number to identify the sign application and an expiration date.
· Expiration dates would be staggered to allow adequate time for staff review.
An alternative approach would be to continue with the current sign permit regulations and not
require an annual permit.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff requests the City Commission considers the matter and provide direction regarding this
matter.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Section 16-76, City Code
B. Ordinance 2000-17
COMMISSION ACTION:
ATTACHMENT A
ATTACHMENT B
SIGNS AND ADVERTISING
S 16.77
(2) Within two (2) years of the effective date of
this division, all nonconforming outdoor ad.
vertising signs and their supporting memo .
bel's shall be removed.
(3) Any nonconforming identification sign may
be allowed to continue, provided the busi-
ness or use it advertises remains in opera.
tion. When the business or use is discon-
tinued, the sign must be removed, and any
replacement sign must conform to all ex-
isting regulations.
(b) Signs placed on public right-of-way without
uthorization shall be subject to immediate re-
moval by the department of public works of the
. city.
.Code 1974, ~ 5-114)
Sec. 16-57. Prohibited signs.
The following signs are hereby prohibited:
(1) Snipe signs;
(2) Freestanding signs;
(3) Obscene signs;
(4) Hazardous signs;
(5) Flashing, running or revolving illuminated
signs;
(6) Bus stop shelter signs;
(7) Any sign placed on public right-of-way for
more than twenty-four (24) hours which does
not comply with this regulation;
(8) Balloon displays;
(9) Spot or search lights.
(Code 1974, ~ 5-115)
Sec. 16-58. Variances.
(al Variances to this article, except for those
decisions made by the site plan review board or
staff review, may be b'Tan ted by the city board of
adjustment pursuant to sections 20-82 and 20-83
of the City Code.
(bl Decisions made by the site plan review board
may be appealed to the city commission pursuant
to section 9.348 of the Cit.y Code.
Supp. No.6
(cl Decisions made by the staff review may be
appealed pursuant to section 20-355 of the City
Code.
(Code 1974, ~ 5.117)
Sees. 16-59-16-75. Reserved.
DIVISION 2. STANDARDS*
Sec. 16-76. Generally.
All signs shall be maintained in original condi-
tion. No sign shall be plac.ed in a city-controlled
right-of-way with the exception of directional signs.
Any sign erected on private property that exceeds
six (6) square feet in area requires the payment of,
a fee to and a permit from the building depart-
ment, and shall display an official city sticker
showing the date of expiration. No sign shall ob-
struct the sight of any roadway or driveway in-
tersection or approach between two (2) feet and
five (5) feet from ground level.
(Code 1974, ~ 5-113(a))
Sec. 16-77. Outdoor displaylbillboards-Off-
premises signs.
(a) Any outdoor advertising displaylbillboard
off-premises sign shall be set back a minimum of
twenty-five (25) feet from the right-of-way on all
state, county, and munieipal roads.
(b) S~ch signs shall not be located nearer than
five hundred (500) feet lea the nearest residential
district.
(c) On all state, county and municipal roads,
such signs shall be placed a minimum distance of
two thousand (2,000) feet apart. No new such sign
shall obstruct the sight of an existing permitted
sign.
(d) Such signs shall not exceed one hundred
sixty (160) square feet of copy area, or project
more than twenty-five (25) feet above the crown
of the road which the sign is designated primarily
to serve. The copy area limit allowed on both
sides is a total of three hundred twenty (320)
square feet. "V" signs are permitted, provided
they are constructed with an inner angle not to
exceed thirty (30) degrees.
.Cross refcrcncc-Buildings and building rCb'Ulations, Ch.
6.
959
ORDINANCE NO. 2000-17
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA AMENDING THE
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS CODE OF ORDINANCES,
SECTION 20-466 AND SECTION 20-454 DEALING WITH
SIGNS ALONG S.R434; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF
PRIOR INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES AND
RESOLUTIONS; PROVIDING FOR INCORPORA TION U~TO
THE CODE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Commission of Winter Springs created a special overlay zoning district
to encourage and provide for enhanced property development within the S.R. 434 commercial
corridor, and
WHEREAS, the City Commission of Winter Springs desired to reduce visual distraction
through uniform sign criteria, and
WHEREAS, The City Commission of Winter Springs recognizes thalt existing businesses
within the overlay district may have nonconforming signs whose replacement may impose a financial
hardship, and
WHEREAS, the City Commission however, finds that nonconforming signs are not favored
by law and shall, within a reasonable time proscribed herein, be amortized, removed, and replaced
with a new sign conforming to existing city codes,
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF VVINTER SPRINGS
HEREBY ORDAINS, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Winter Springs Code Section 20-454 and 20-466 are hereby amended as follows:
(underlined type indicates additions and stflkeem type indicates deletions, while asterisks (* * *)
indicate a deletion from the Ordinance of text existing in Section 20-454 and Section 20-466. It is
intended that the text in Section 454 and Section 20-466 denoted by the asterisks and set forth in this
Ordinance shall remain unchanged from the language existing prior to adoption of this Ordinance).
Section 20-454 Signs.
* * *
(r) Nonconforming Signs.
(1) Any sign, other than billboards, fla.vtAg-atHlriginal cost--ift-fficcess of ofle-flltfldred
($100) doJ.laFS-afla which is nonconforming as-ro-peRlliHed-sigfl-aFt:a or any ot:fler reason
which 'vvould necessi tate-t-he-oomplete-remeval-eF-tetftH:eplaeemeHt--ef-the-sign, shall be
amortized and may be maintained until November 14. 2002 .a-peFfeG-ef-frem onc(]) to
City of Wintcr Springs Ordinancc No. 2000-17
Page I of 4
2
fivc (5) ycars from the-el:feet+ve-date-ef-these--desigH-sHmdaFds. ::r-He-tefm of yea-FS-ffi-be
detcrmincd by thc cost of the-sign or of rcoovatien,itlBlttdiflg-ffist-allation, shull-be-as
follo"...s:
Original Sign cost or
Renovation Cost
Pcrmittcd Y cars from
Effective Date of Design Standards
$0 $3,000
~Ol $10,000
Over $10,000
2
3
5
(2) Any owner of a sign '.vho desires to rely upon an amortization-peFiod longer-than
three(3) years shall file with the City within one (1) year fronrthc effectivc datc of
these design standards, a statemcnt sctting f-orth the cost and date ofthc most rcccnt
renovation, and a written agreemcnt to rcmove or bring into conformance the
fleRooAfenning sign at oF-pFior to the expiration of the amortization period applieable
te-that sign. Thc maximum period to amortizc a sign shall bc fivc (5) years.
At or prior to November 14. 2002. all nonconforming signs shall be removed and
may be replaced with signs that confonn to the design standards set forth in the S.R.
434 New Development regulations.
(3) Violations shall be subject to Chapter 2, Article 3. Division 2 Code Enforcement,
City of Winter Springs Code of Ordinances.
Section 20-466 Signs
* * *
( r) Nonconforming Signs.
( 1 ) Any sign, other than billboards, having an original cost in cxcess of one hundrcd
($100) dollars aRe-which is nonconfonning as to pennitted sign area or any other reason
which woul6-Accessitate the complete removal or replacemcnt of thc sign, shall be
amortized and may be maintained until November 14. 2002. a-peAod offrom one (1) to
five (5) yeaFS-fr.em-the effective date ofthese-eesign standards. The term of years to be
determined by the cost of the-sign or of renovation, ineluding installation cost, s~e
as-feMews:-
City ofWintcr Springs Ordinancc No. 2000-17
Pagc 2 01"4
3
GfigiHal Sign cost or
ReHB-vatieft-Gest
Permitted Years frem
Effectivc Datc ofDesi~
$0 to $3,000
$3,001 to $10,000
Over $10,000
2
3
5
(2) Any ovmer of a sign who desires to relay upon an ameft.i.m.tH:m-peood longeF--tltaH
three (3) years shall file with the City within one-(l) year from the effective date of these
design standards, a statement settffig---fBFtfl-the cost and date of the most recent
renovatien, and a written agreement to remeve-BF----9flng-iflte--€BAfurmance the
nonconforming sign at or prior to the expiration of the amortization period appHeable-tB
that sign. The maximum period to amortize a sign shall be five (5) yeaFS:-
At or prior to November 14. 2002. all nonconforming signs shall be removed and
may be replaced with signs that conform to the design standards set forth in the S.R.
434 Redevelopment regulations.
(3) Violations shall be subject to Chapter 2. Article 3. Division 2. Code Enforcement,
City of Winter Springs Code of Ordinances.
Section 2. Repeal of Prior Inconsistent Ordinances and Resolutions. All prior inconsistent
ordinances and resolutions adopted by the City Commi~sion, or parts of ordinances and resolutions
in conflict herewith, are hereby repealed to the extent of the conflict.
Section 3. Incorporation Into Code. This ordinance shall be incorporated into the Winter
Springs City Code and any section or paragraph number or letter and any heading may be changed
or modified as necessary to effectuate the foregoing.
Section 4. Severability. Ifany section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase:, word or provision
of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent
jurisdiction, whether for substantive, procedural, or any other reason, such porti.on shall be deemed
a separate, distinct and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions of this ordinance.
Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption
by the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida.
City of Winter Springs Ordinl1nee No, 2000-17
Page 3 or 4
~
4
ADOPTED by the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, in a regular
meeting assembled on the _ day of ,2000.
Paul P. Partyka, Mayor
ATTEST:
Andrea Lorenzo-Luaces, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND SUFFICIENCY
FOR THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS ONLY:
Anthony A. Garganese, City Attorney
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Effective Date:
City or Winter Springs Ordinancc No. 2000-17
('lIgc 401'4